Loading...
09-12-2022 Agenda and PacketA.5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Fountain Conference Room in the lower level of City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. A.1 Valley Auto Salvage - Request for Expansion of Non-conforming use for Recycling A.2 Highway 7 Road Safety Audit A.3 Discussion of 2023 Preliminary Budget, Levy and CIP (ITEM POSTPONED TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2022) A.4 Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS C.1 Teen Volunteer Recognition D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. D.1 Approve City Council Minutes dated August 22, 2022 D.2 Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated August 16, 2022 D.3 Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated June 28, 2022 AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 1 D.4 Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated June 17, 2022 D.5 Approve Claims Paid dated September 12, 2022 D.6 Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, St. Hubert Catholic Community, Harvest Festival on September 24, 2022 D.7 Approve Fireworks Display Permit for St. Hubert Catholic Community Harvest Festival on September 24, 2022 D.8 Resolution 2022-XX: Authorize Entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with Carver County for a Cardboard Recycling Drop-off Site in Chanhassen E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda). E.1 Christie Larson, Southern Valley Alliance - Domestic Violence Awareness Month Presentation F.PUBLIC HEARINGS G.GENERAL BUSINESS G.1 Ordinance XXX: RSI Marine, 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard: Consider a Request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development with Site Plan, Consolidation of Lots, and Variances G.2 Ordinance XXX: Avienda-Consider a Request to Amend Planned Unit Development-RC G.3 Resolution 2022-XX: Adopt the Preliminary Tax Levy, Budget and Establish the Truth-In- Taxation Public Hearing Date (ITEM POSTPONED TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2022) H.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS J.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION J.1 2022 Building Permit Activity K.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at 2 https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 3 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Valley Auto Salvage - Request for Expansion of Non-conforming use for Recycling File No.N/A Item No: A.1 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner Reviewed By Kate Aanenson SUGGESTED ACTION N/A - Discussion only and provide direction. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The property owner is requesting that the City provide them with direction regarding the use of the property. They are currently performing automobile salvage operations on the site as allowed under the existing nonconforming use. Before they expend the time and costs to upgrade, improve and expand the operation, they would like an indication of whether the City would approve the "expansion" of the operation to include the acceptance of additional metals for recycling including appliances, scrap metal, aluminum cans, electronics, etc. BACKGROUND Township of Chanhassen granted approval for the operation of a salvage yard on the property in 1958. On April 26, 1974, Valley Auto Parts was granted a Judgement by the District Court Fourth Judicial District to continue the nonconforming use of the property. 4 January 10, 2020, the property was forfeited to the State of Minnesota for failure to pay taxes. On May 10, 2020, Carver County approved the repurchase of the property by the property owner subject to the environmental clean-up of the property. The property owner spent 2020 and 2021 cleaning up environmental impacts on the property and removing vehicles from the site. The owner then continued the auto salvage operations. The property is shown within the floodway (AE Zone) of the Flood Insurance Rate Map. DISCUSSION The property owner would like to expand the operations of the salvage yard to include metal, electronics and appliance recycling. To do that, they would make improvements to the site including adding a screening fence, installing a paved driveway, delivery and parking surface, installing truck scales, preparing stormwater improvements, and constructing a building on the site. Prior to initiating the engineering work and architectural design, they would like to determine if the City would support such a project and allow the expansion of the use for recycling. The owner has the ability to continue the current auto salvage operations on the site subject to the stipulations in the District Court Judgement: Furnishing an inventory of cars as of March 15th of each year Limiting the stacking of auto bodies on site Prohibiting the expansion of the operation onto adjacent properties Screening the site through landscaping along CSAH 61 Expansion of the operations would require determination of the flood elevation on the property and potentially a revision to the flood map, approval of a conditional use permit for alterations within the floodplain and, possibly, outdoor storage, and site plan approval from the City. Additionally, the applicant would need permits from the Lower Minnesota Watershed District, Carver County, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The City shall regulate the repair, replacement, maintenance, improvement or expansion of nonconforming uses and structures in floodplain areas to the extent necessary to maintain eligibility in the national flood insurance program and not increase flood damage potential or increase the degree of obstruction to flood flows in the floodway. The proposed expanded operation could provide a needed service for the City of Chanhassen as well as the surrounding areas of Carver County and southwestern Hennepin County. The closest similar facilities are at Dem-Con in Shakopee, Minnesota, which is a fully licensed waste facility. The proposed site improvements would improve the property aesthetically and create a safer environmental operation through the provision of hazardous material catch basins in conjunction with decontamination of vehicles, a hard surface directing surface water to stormwater infiltration basins, and less dirt being tracked off the site. Any expansion of the operation would need to be approved through a public hearing process, and the project would need to meet all requirements of City Code and other agency permitting and licensing regulations. The potential expansion would meet the purpose and intent of the nonconforming use standards by reducing their impact on adjacent properties; and it is in the public interest. The City may, by ordinance, permit an expansion or impose upon nonconformities reasonable regulations to prevent and abate nuisances and to protect the public health, welfare or safety. 5 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council discuss the potential expansion of the recycling operation of the site and provide direction for its future use. ATTACHMENTS Flying Cloud Recycling Expansion, August 14, 2022 District Court Decision 285 Flying Cloud Dr Schematic Design Plans Version 5_12 FIRM Map Copy of Email Chain Regarding Licensing and Permitting for Potential Expansion Chapter 20 Art II Div 4 Nonconforming Uses 6 285 Flying Cloud – Chanhassen, MN Recycling Expansion Request To Whom It May Concern – In 1953 the City of Chanhassen recognized that the land located at 285 Flying Cloud Road was operating as an Auto Salvage Yard. In 1967 or so the Auto Salvage Yard was purchased by LaVerne Vassar (nickname Frenchie). While Frenchie had worked at the yard for years prior to purchasing it, it was evident that when Frenchie took over, his mode of operation was a concern to the City. In 1974 the City of Chanhassen issued Frenchie a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) which contained several guidelines that Frenchie was to follow. Well that did not work out very well either. As the years passed, Frenchie and the City developed a long history of the City trying to get Frenchie to keep the place clean and organized. Those days have now passed and a now a New Owner Operate has purchased the property. This particular Owner currently operates two Auto Recycling Centers in Minnesota. The Flying Cloud site is a great third location for them to expand into as it has been a staple in the Chanhassen community for nearly 70 years. Just about everyone that has anything to do with Auto Parts, Salvage or Recycling knows of Frenchie’s. Over the years Automobiles have changed and developed into the computer controlled self-driving vehicles of today from their merger start as all steel construction and simple gasoline engines. The Automobile Parts & Salvage and Recycling industry has had to change too. Today there are basically three operating models, all of which now have a recycling component to generate maximum income. The Three Models – 1) Traditional Auto Parts Yard – a. Purchasing vehicles b. Decontaminate (ie.. remove the fluids and chemicals) c. Pull the desired parts and place into inventory d. Place the remaining vehicle shell into the yard e. Eventually recycle the empty vehicle shell 2) U Pull Our Parts Yard - a. Purchase vehicles b. Decontaminate c. Place entire vehicle in yard d. Customers enter the Yard and pull the parts they want e. On a timed bases typical 90-120 days, the vehicles are pulled and sent to the recycler 7 3) Auto Recycling Centers – a. Purchase vehicles b. Decontaminate c. Immediately pull all the recyclable parts and sort into bins d. Pull all remaining copper wires e. Vehicle shells are sent to the Recycling center within weeks f. No Parts Sale, No Disassemble or Parts Inventory, no long term storage of vehicle shells The current CUP for the Flying Cloud site allows for Auto Salvage. The new Owner operates under the Auto Recycling Center model and has no interest in selling part or having a U Pull Our Parts Yard. Their business model recycles the metals from the vehicles. Given their operation is completely based of the recycling of the vehicle metals, they are requesting to be allowed to take in other metal materials to recycle. These materials could be from the local community and could include recycle appliances, backyard scrap, aluminum cans or so on. Materials could also come from local construction projects looking for a place to get paid for their scrap material. Given Carver County has been one of the fastest expanding counties in Minnesota this location would be a welcome addition as it would considerable cut down on the hauling times. This Salvage Yard in Chanhassen has been around for nearly 70 years and over the years it has been used as a recycling center, even though the previous owner did not to the greatest job in keeping it looking like a real business. The New Owner has spent nearly two years working on this site, from taking it through the Carver County foreclosure process to having it completely cleaned up to meet the City’s, Carver County’s and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s requirement to obtain a No Further Action Letter. Given the new Owner’s proven history, commitment to this site and the community, the request for expansion of the Conditional Use Permit to allow for a Metal Recycling seems reasonable and adds an additional business service that truly improves the available enmities for the area. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely yours – C. Chanthakhammy Owner Operator – 285 Flying Cloud Rd. Chanhassen, MN 8 9 10 11 CHAIN-LINK FENCE(FLYING CLOUD DRIVE)(Public R ight of Way)GATE FOR FENCEN00°24'43"W 1474.10AREA = 257,854 SF. (5.91 AC)EAST LINE OF WEST HALF OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 36 SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 212165.00271.0S08°53'40"E4.68(N0°11'46"E DEED)(N72°54'12"E DEED)(N88°41'37"E DEED)COUNTY ROAD 61CENTER LINE OF STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 212N00°24'43"W 1469.00 N89°35'17"E1367.90(N07°41'37"E DEED)593.06582.8214"BITUMINOUSGRAVELRETAINING WALLGRAVELGRAVELBITUMINOUSGAS TANKBILLBOARD SIGNCBRim=728.83Inv=726.23 NCBRim=728.86Inv= 725.89 N/SGRAVELBITUMINOUSN71°41'29"E414.77S01°37'00"E 396.45 (415.00 DEED) S02°31'00"E (S1°18'23"E) 712.30S87°29'00"W165.00N01°00'51"W 674.26S87°29'00"W351.80N82°22'24"E316.80N71°41'29"E19.85441.3441.3441.3S08°53'40"E41.76S71°41'04"W51.80S19°18'56"ES71°41'04"W55.55S06°23'23"E315.89N82°21'41"E79.95220.0055.19269.6(N83°35'01"E DEED)CONCRETEDATEISSUES / REVISIONSNO.DRAWNCHECKEDUSER: apawelk XREF(s): 20-028_22X34_X-GEN-TBLK.dwgSCALE: 1 DATE/TIME: May 11, 2022 - 3:02pmFILE: P:\2020\20-028 - 285 Flying Cloud Drive\CAD\DWG\XREF\20-028_X-SUR.dwg LAYOUT: Layout1LIC. NO.DATE:Paul A. Thorp13637I hereby certify that this plan, survey, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.285 FLYING CLOUD DRCHASKA, MNHANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc.7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344952-829-0700 952-829-7806 faxEngineering SurveyingLandscape ArchitecturePROJECT NO.20-028.2SHEETOF3HORIZONTALFIELD104/08/2022SCHEMATIC DESIGN FOR OWNER REVIEWXX-XX-2022JMBPATJPB205/11/2022PRELIMINARY CITY SUBMITTALSECTIONPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY LINECHAIN-LINK FENCERETAINING WALLTELEPHONE LINEELECTRICAL LINESTORM SEWERCONCRETEPROPERTY DESCRIPTION:A tract of land in the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 116, Range 23, CarverCounty,Minnesota, described as follows:Commencing at the intersection of the East line of said West Half of Northeast Quarter and the southerlyboundary of State Highway No. 212., and running thence South along said East line a distance of 441.3feet; thence West at right angles to said East line a distance of 165.0 feet; thence North and to a pointlying on said Southerly boundary and a distance of 165 feet westerly of the point of beginning a distanceof 415.0 feet; thence Easterly along said Southerly boundary to the point of beginning. Containing 1.6acres of land, more or less.A tract of land in the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 116, Range 23, CarverCounty, Minnesota described as follows:Commencing at the intersection of the East line of said West Half of Northeast Quarter and the Southerlyboundary of State Highway No. 212, as now located; thence Westerly along the said Southerly boundarya distance of 165.0 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continuing Westerly along saidSoutherly boundary a distance of 269.6 feet; thence deflecting South at an angle of 77 degrees 47minutes and a distance of 560.0 feet; thence East and at right angles to said East line a distance of351.8 feet to said East line; thence North along said East line a distance of 271.0 feet; thence West andat right angles to said East line a distance of 165.0 feet; thence North to the actual point of beginning adistance of 415 feet, more or less, said tract containing 3.6 acres. Together with a perpetual easementacross a five foot wide strip of land lying between the Westerly boundary of the above tract of land andthe creek presently existing on the premises of first parties {grantors in that certain deed dated January5, 1974, recorded on July 1, 1963 in Book 173 of Deeds, page 186-187 as Document No. 60265) for thepurposes of laying an underground tile or pipe line to be used in connection with any well that may beconstructed on said above described premises.EXCEPT a tract of land in the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 116, Range 23,Carver County, Minnesota described as follows:Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said West Half of the Northeast Quarter and thesoutherly right-of-way of State Highway Nos. 169 and 212, said right-of-way being 40.00 feetsoutheasterly of highway centerline; thence along said East line South 1 degree 18 minutes 23 secondsEast, 712.30 feet; thence at right angles to said East line South 88 degrees 41 minutes 37 seconds West,351.80 feet; thence North 7 degrees 41 minutes 04 seconds West, 4.68 feet; thence North 83 degrees35 minutes 01 seconds East, 316.80 feet; thence North 0 degrees 11 minutes 46 seconds East, 674.26feet to the highway right-of way; thence along said highway right-of-way North 72 degrees 54 minutes12 seconds East, 19.85 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.60 acres, more or less.ALSO That part of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 116, Range 23, CarverCounty, Minnesota described as follows:Commencing at the intersection of the east line of said West Half Northeast Quarter and the southerlyright of way of State Highway Nos. 169 and 212, said right of way being forty feet southeasterly ofhighway centerline; thence along said highway right-of-way South 72 degrees 54 minutes 12 secondsWest, 434.60 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence South 7 degrees 41 minutes 04 seconds East,593.06 feet; thence South 83 degrees 35 minutes 01 seconds West. 79.95 feet; thence North 5 degrees10 minutes 40 seconds West, 582.82 feet to the highway right-of-way; thence along said highwayright-of-way North 72 degrees 54 minutes 12 seconds East, 55.19 feet to the point of Beginning: Exceptthat part deeded to the Minnesota Department of Transportation in a Warranty Deed, dated May 7, 1980,in Deed book 155, page 483, of the records of Carver County; containing 0.71 acre, more or less.1.BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE CARVER COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD83-86 ADJ).2.THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF SHOWING EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR SITEIMPROVEMENTS.3.ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MN/DOT GEODETIC STATION DISC CS 03 MN019, WHICH HAS ANELEVATION OF 729.41 FEET.4.THE GROSS LAND AREA OF THE PROPERTY IS 257,854 +/- SQUARE FEET OR 5.9195 +/- ACRES.General Survey Notes:LINETYPE LEGEND Not to ScaleVICINITY MAPSITEEXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEYSIGNTRANSFORMERCATCH BASINFOUND IRON MONUMENTDECIDUOUS TREESCALE IN FEET050100150112 (FLYING CLOUD DRIVE)(Public Right of Way)COUNTY ROAD 6114" CB Rim=728.83 Inv=726.23 N CB Rim=728.86 Inv= 725.89 N/S 139' TRUCK SCALE (OUTGOING) TRUCK SCALE (INCOMING) WB-67 SEMI-TRACTOR TRAILER TURNING MOVEMENT 36'CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON R 3 0 ' EXISTING CONCRETE PADS TO BE REMOVED 30' EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED 164' 1 1 6 ' END 6" CURB BEGIN 6" CURB 9'x18' PARKING STALL (x8) 195'20'20'FUTURE BUILDING EXPANSION (+7,720 SF) PROPOSED BUILDING (2,280 SF)100'100'38' 60'108'R 2 5 'R25'R25'142.6'R100'301' SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 60 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ! MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO NOTIFY THE REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER AT LEAST TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL www.gopherstateonecall.org 1-800-252-1166 Minnesota SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN 2 DATE ISSUES / REVISIONSNO.DRAWN CHECKED USER: apawelk XREF(s): 20-028_22X34_X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-028_X-SUR.dwg 20-028_X-CIV-VEHICLE TRACKING.dwg 20-028_X-CIV-SITE.dwgSCALE: 0 DATE/TIME: May 11, 2022 - 3:02pmFILE: P:\2020\20-028 - 285 Flying Cloud Drive\CAD\DWG\PLANSHEETS\CIVIL\20-028_CIV-SITE.dwg LAYOUT: 001LIC. NO.DATE: 285 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN HANSEN T HORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO.20-028.2 SHEET OF 3 HORIZONTALI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ADAM PAWELK 49990 XX-XX-2022 AN AN AMP DESIGN 1 04/08/2022 SCHEMATIC DESIGN FOR OWNER REVIEW AN AN AMP205/11/2022 PRELIMINARY CITY SUBMITTAL SITE DATA PROPERTY AREA: 257,854 SF (5.92 AC) PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: 10,000 SF (TOTAL BUILD) PROPOSED PAVEMENT AREA: 62,553 SF TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 72,553 SF (1.67 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: 28.1% *PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE MINNESOTA RIVER "FLOODWAY" ZONE PER FEMA MAPPING 13 (FLYING CLOUD DRIVE)(Public Right of Way)COUNTY ROAD 6114" CB Rim=728.83 Inv=726.23 N CB Rim=728.86 Inv= 725.89 N/S PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=729.50 728722729729730728 728729723726 724 725 723 716 717 719718 721 720 719 718 717 724727 71 5731730 72 7731 717 719 718 D15" RCP STORM 15" RCP STORM 12" RCP STORM INFILTRATION BASIN (INCLUDES 1.5' DEPTH OF ROOTZONE MIX, ASSUMES UNDERLYING SANDY SOILS) 15" RCP STORM STMH W/ SUMP SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 60 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ! MINNESOTA LAW REQUIRES EXCAVATORS TO NOTIFY THE REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTER AT LEAST TWO (2) BUSINESS DAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION GOPHER STATE ONE CALL www.gopherstateonecall.org 1-800-252-1166 Minnesota SCHEMATIC GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 3 DATE ISSUES / REVISIONSNO.DRAWN CHECKED USER: apawelk XREF(s): 20-028_22X34_X-GEN-TBLK.dwg 20-028_X-SUR.dwg 20-028_X-CIV-SITE.dwg 20-028_X-CIV-GRAD.dwgSCALE: 0 DATE/TIME: May 11, 2022 - 5:07pmFILE: P:\2020\20-028 - 285 Flying Cloud Drive\CAD\DWG\PLANSHEETS\CIVIL\20-028_CIV-GRAD.dwg LAYOUT: 001LIC. NO.DATE: 285 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON,Inc. 7510 Market Place Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952-829-0700 952-829-7806 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture PROJECT NO.20-028.2 SHEET OF 3 HORIZONTALI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ADAM PAWELK 49990 XX-XX-2022 AN AN AMP DESIGN 1 04/08/2022 SCHEMATIC DESIGN FOR OWNER REVIEW AN AN AMP205/11/2022 PRELIMINARY CITY SUBMITTAL LEGEND - PROPOSED CONTOUR STORM SEWER STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION RIPRAP 838 D 14 FIRM Map 15 C. Chanthakhammy, The continuing non-conforming use is limited to auto salvage operations.The potential use expansion (recycling facility: scrap collection, appliance collection and e-waste collection) is not permitted by City Code and would require Chanhassen City Council approval of an expansion of the non-conformity. Permitted uses of the property are found in Chapter 20, Article X of the Chanhassen City Code, A-2, Agricultural Estate District.https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book?type=ordinances#name=ARTICLE_ 20-X_%22A-2%22_AGRICULTURAL_ESTATE_DISTRICT Please note that determination of the flood elevation on the property is required prior to any improvements or alterations. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH.952.227.1131 FX.952.227.1110 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us From:Michael Mrotz <mmrotz@co.carver.mn.us> Sent:Tuesday, August 9, 2022 10:14 AM To:importparts31@live.com Cc:Generous, Bob <bgenerous@chanhassenmn.gov>; naiadconsulting@gmail.com; della@youngecg.com Subject:Former Statewide Auto Salvage Site Mike Dear C. Chanthakhammy, I am writing to follow-up on our discussion from 7/22/2022. My goal is to very generally touch on the environmental regulations that you will need to address prior to opening a recycling facility. I have included contact names and resources when possible. To my knowledge, this list covers the required environmental regulations, but there may be other regulations that come into play as your project develops. 16 When we spoke, you indicated that your intention for the former Statewide Auto Salvage site, parcel 250363000, is to open a recycling facility that serves the public. This facility would accept scrap metal, appliances, and automobiles from residents. The intent is to have some light processing on site, draining fluids from automobiles, and metal sheer for sizing metal prior to shipment. Based on our conversation, the site is currently being used to stage vehicles that are destined for salvage. At this time, there is no dismantling or processing of vehicles at this location. The automobiles are parked on location and once a full load is collected, they are placed onto a flatbed trailer for transport to a salvage facility. Below are the environmental regulations I have Identified: Due to this parcel being in close proximity to the MN River, installation of a non- pervious surface (such as concrete pad, gravel parking lot, or a building) may trigger the requirement for a stormwater permit. This permit would be issued by the Lower MN River Watershed District. Contact information for Lower MN River Watershed District staff is below. Please connect with Linda or Della about your plans for the site to determine if a Stormwater Permit is required. Administrator Linda Loomis Phone: 763-545-4659 Email: naiadconsulting@gmail.com Engineer Young Environmental Consulting Group, LLC Contact: Della Schall Young Phone: 651-249-6974 Email: della@youngecg.com Processing of appliances and/or automobiles (dismantling and draining fluids) will require the site to have a Hazardous Waste Generator License and a Hazardous Waste ID#. The Hazardous Waste Generator License is issued by Carver County, contact information and licensing link below. Microsoft Word - HWLicenseApplication.doc (carver.mn.us) Michael Mrotz Phone: 952-361-1809 e-mail: mmrotz@co.carver.mn.us MPCA issues the Hazardous Waste ID#s, see link below for instructions. Obtain a Hazardous Waste Identification Number (state.mn.us) 17 Electronic Waste Collection will trigger the need to register with the MPCA as an E- Waste Collector complete annual reporting to MPCA. This registration can be completed through MPCA’s e-services portal, see links below. Electronics recycling collectors | Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (state.mn.us) Managing Electronic Waste (state.mn.us) Auto salvage, scrap collection, and/or appliance collection and e-waste collection will require an Industrial Stormwater Permit. This permit is a federal requirement but the permit issued and administered by MPCA. The link below has information about the MPCA Industrial Stormwater Permit program. This program is different from the Lower MN Watershed District permit listed above. Industrial stormwater | Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (state.mn.us) Please continue to work with the City of Chanhassen to ensure proper building/site improvement plans and permits are in place, and that you are operating within the existing Non-Conforming Use Permit previously issued by the City of Chanhassen. I believe the existing use permit only allows for auto salvage at this site. Collecting additional materials from the public may require additional review by the City of Chanhassen. Bob Generous is copied on this e-mail, and he can help you in this regard. Carver County ordinance requires that you follow applicable State regulations. Carver County will issue the Hazardous Waste Generator License. For all other licenses, registrations and permits you will need to work directly with each listed agency. Lastly, below I have included links to MPCA fact sheets covering some of these topics. These are more general information but they may be helpful. Vehicle Dismantling and Salvage (state.mn.us) Appliance Recycling - Requirements for recyclers (state.mn.us) Managing Electronic Waste (state.mn.us) Identifying, Using and Managing PCBs (state.mn.us) Please let me know if you have questions. I am happy to help in any way I can. Thank you, Michael Mrotz | Senior Environmentalist | Public Services Division | Department of Environmental Services Carver County Courthouse | 600 4th Street East | Chaska, Minnesota | 55318-2102 | 952.361.1809 | mmrotz@co.carver.mn.us 18 DIVISION 20-II-4 NONCONFORMING USES Sec 20-71 Purpose Sec 20-72 Nonconforming Uses And Structures Sec 20-73 Nonconforming Lots Of Record Editor's note(s)—Section 2 of Ord. No. 165, adopted Feb. 10, 1992, amended Div. 4 in its entirety to read as set out herein. Former Div. 4, §§ 20-71—20-78, pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 80, Art. III, § 5, adopted Dec. 15, 1986; and Ord. No. 163, § 1, adopted Feb. 24, 1992. Sec 20-71 Purpose The purpose of this division is: (a) To recognize the existence of uses, lots and structures which were lawful when established, but which no longer meet all ordinance requirements; (b) To prevent the enlargement, expansion, intensification or extension of any nonconforming use, building or structure; and (c) To encourage the elimination of nonconforming uses, lots and structures or reduce their impact on adjacent properties. (Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2-10-92) Sec 20-72 Nonconforming Uses And Structures (a) Any nonconformity, including the lawful use or occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control under this chapter, may be continued, including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance or improvement, but not including expansion, unless: (1) The nonconformity or occupancy is discontinued for a period of more than one year; or (2) Any nonconforming use is destroyed by fire or other peril to the extent of greater than 50 percent of its market value, and no building permit has been applied for within 180 days of when the property is damaged. In this case, the city may impose reasonable conditions upon a building permit in order to mitigate any newly created impact on adjacent property. (b) Any subsequent use or occupancy of the land or premises shall be a conforming use or occupancy. The city may, by ordinance, permit an expansion or impose upon nonconformities reasonable regulations to prevent and abate nuisances and to protect the public health, welfare or safety. This section does not prohibit the city from enforcing an ordinance that applies to adults-only bookstores, adults-only theaters, or similar adults-only businesses, as defined by ordinance. (c) Notwithstanding subsection (a), the city shall regulate the repair, replacement, maintenance, improvement or expansion of nonconforming uses and structures in floodplain areas to the extent necessary to maintain eligibility in the national flood insurance program and not Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinan... 1 of 2 8/25/2022, 2:52 PM 19 increase flood damage potential or increase the degree of obstruction to flood flows in the floodway. (d) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, any detached single-family dwelling that is on a nonconforming lot or that is a nonconforming use or structure may be altered, or expanded provided, however, that the nonconformity may not be increased. If a setback of a dwelling is nonconforming, no additions may be added to the nonconforming side of the building unless the addition meets setback requirements. (e) Notwithstanding the prohibitions contained in the forgoing subsections of this section, if approved by the city council a nonconforming land use may be changed to another nonconforming land use of less intensity if it is in the public interest. In all instances the applicant has the burden of proof regarding the relative intensities of uses. (Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2-10-92; Ord. No. 377, §§ 10, 11, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 423, § 2, 6-12-06) Sec 20-73 Nonconforming Lots Of Record (a) No variance shall be required to construct a detached single-family dwelling on a nonconforming lot of record, excluding platted outlots, provided that it fronts on a public street or approved private street and provided that the structure meets the minimum requirements of this chapter. (b) Except as otherwise specifically provided for detached single-family dwellings, there shall be no expansion, intensification, replacement or structural changes of a structure on a nonconforming lot. (c) If a nonconforming lot or parcel is, or at any time since June 25, 2012, has been held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining or abutting parcel or lot, then such nonconforming lot or parcel and such adjoining or abutting parcel or lot shall be deemed one lot. If in a group of two or more adjoining or abutting lots or parcels owned or controlled by the same person, any single lot or parcel does not meet 75 percent of the full minimum depth, width, and area requirements of this chapter, such single lot or parcel shall not be considered as a separate lot or parcel able to be conveyed or developed under this chapter. (Ord. No. 165, § 2, 2-10-92; Ord. No. 377, § 12, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 423, § 3, 6-12-06; Ord. No. 543, § 1, 6-25-12) Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinan... 2 of 2 8/25/2022, 2:52 PM 20 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Highway 7 Road Safety Audit File No.N/A Item No: A.2 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A - presentation only Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Communications SUMMARY Representatives from Highway 100 in St. Louis Park and Carver County Road 33 in Hollywood Township. A copy of the final RSA report is attached to this agenda report. The website for the RSA can be found here: www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/projects/hwy7slp- hollywood/index.html BACKGROUND The RSA was conducted to determine if the number and severity of crashes at intersections along segments in the corridor is abnormal, to identify the primary factors for the crashes, and to propose short, medium, and long-term updates to improve safety on Highway 7. To do this, a team of experts was assembled to review the safety and operations of the roadway. The 21 team reviewed relevant existing information along the corridor, performed a review of identified areas of safety concern, and identified and prioritized improvements and strategies for reducing the degree of safety risk that may be implemented as a part of future projects. DISCUSSION The City Council should feel free to ask questions after the presentation, and to provide any comments and/or requests to MnDOT on TH7 through Chanhassen. BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS FINAL - Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report dated July 18, 2022 22   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 1    Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report  JULY 2022                      Prepared By:            23   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 2  Contents  1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 3  1.1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................................. 3  1.2 What is a Road Safety Audit? .................................................................................................................... 4  1.3 RSA Review Team ...................................................................................................................................... 5  2 Background ........................................................................................................................................................ 6  2.1 Corridor Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................................................... 6  2.2 Corridor Speeds ......................................................................................................................................... 6  2.3 Relevant Plans and Studies ........................................................................................................................ 8  2.4 Crash Trends ............................................................................................................................................ 11  3 Crash Analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 15  3.1 Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista ............................................................................ 15  3.2 Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka ........................................................................................... 21  3.3 Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park ........................................................................................ 26  4 Public Engagement .......................................................................................................................................... 31  4.1 Interactive Map ....................................................................................................................................... 32  4.2 Survey Demographic Responses: ............................................................................................................ 33  5 Road Safety Audit Process ............................................................................................................................... 34  6 Potential Improvements Summary ................................................................................................................. 34  6.1 Corridor‐wide Initiatives .......................................................................................................................... 35  6.2 Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista ............................................................................ 35  6.3 Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka ........................................................................................... 42  6.4 Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park ........................................................................................ 49  7 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................................... 55  8 Appendix A – Comment Letters....................................................................................................................... 57      24   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 3  1 Introduction  The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is leading a study of a 32‐mile segment of Highway 7  between Highway 100 in St. Louis Park and Carver County Road 33 in Hollywood Township to identify potential  safety improvements and strategies that may be implemented. A Road Safety Audit (RSA) was conducted to  determine if the number and severity of crashes at intersections and along segments is abnormal, to identify the  primary factors for the crashes, and to propose short‐, medium‐ and long‐term updates to improve safety on  Highway 7.  To do this, a team of experts was assembled to review the safety and operations of the roadway. The team  reviewed relevant existing information along the corridor, performed a review of identified areas of safety  concern, and identified and prioritized improvements and strategies for reducing the degree of safety risk that  may be implemented as a part of future projects.   1.1 Study Area  The Highway 7 corridor between Highway 100 and Carver County Road 33 runs through Hennepin and Carver  counties and through 13 cities/townships: St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Deephaven, Excelsior,  Chanhassen, Shorewood, Victoria, Minnetrista, St. Bonifacius, Laketown Township, Watertown Township, and  Hollywood Township. The study corridor was divided into three segments, which are shown in Figure 1 along  with a list of the jurisdictions included within each segment.     Figure 1 Study Area  The split of these segments was based on the varying characteristics of the roadway which are described below:   Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista (15 miles): primarily rural setting with large  spacing between intersections; almost all intersections are unsignalized  25   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 4   Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka (9 miles): primarily suburban setting with frequent  horizontal curves and higher number of intersections per mile   Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park (8 miles): primarily urban setting; highway is divided with  several grade‐separated intersections and interchanges  1.2 What is a Road Safety Audit?  An RSA is a formal evaluation of planned or existing roadways by an independent, multidisciplinary team. The  team looks for potential safety hazards that may affect all road users and suggests measures to mitigate those  safety issues. An RSA may be performed before, during, or after the design/construction process.   An RSA includes three steps:  1. Understand Existing Conditions – complete pre‐audit data analysis, field review, and obtain input from  the public and targeted stakeholders to understand potential existing safety concerns.  2. Conduct In‐Field Review – complete in‐field review of the corridor and collect additional data if required.   3. Report Findings – identify potential safety projects and solutions, document, and present the findings of  the study.   The purpose of the study is to review crash history, prior planning documents and projects, and existing  conditions to identify potential safety projects and safety strategies that can be implemented as a part of future  projects. In a few cases, these strategies can be implemented relatively easily (i.e., lower cost and by agency  maintenance crews) and in others further study is required. The proposed improvements may need to be  incorporated into a larger construction project, or additional funding may be required. It should be noted that  the purpose of an RSA is to review safety issues along a particular corridor or location. Evaluation and  recommendations of non‐safety related issues (e.g. capacity or signal timing issues) would be considered as part  of a different type of study.   The “4Es” of safety include engineering, education, enforcement, and emergency response and safety solutions  can be related to any of the “4Es” although often the solutions are engineering based.   This RSA included the following key steps:  1. Engage local agencies to develop project scope and focus  2. Assemble an RSA review team  3. Assemble, review, and analyze crash data  4. Create project website and open public input opportunities  5. Collect speed and existing conditions information   6. Create and host online virtual public meeting   7. Assemble the RSA review audit packet  8. Conduct the RSA review  9. Develop the draft RSA report  10. Review and confirm findings with RSA review team  11. Obtain input from stakeholders and local agencies  12. Finalize the RSA report  13. Present findings to the public  26   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 5  1.3 RSA Review Team  The RSA review was conducted in February 2022 during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Under normal circumstances,  the RSA team completes the field review together traveling from site‐to‐site in a large passenger van. Due to  social distancing requirements, a virtual RSA review was conducted where information was assembled in  advance including dashcam video footage of the corridor and photos at key locations.   Members of RSA review team and their position are listed below in Table 1. The team included representation  from MnDOT, the Department of Public Safety (DPS), City of Minnetonka, Carver County, Federal Highway  Administration (FHWA), and Kimley‐Horn.  Table 1 RSA Review Team  Name Title   Derek Leuer MnDOT State Traffic Safety Engineer  Andrew Lutaya MnDOT Metro District West Area Engineer  Ken Johnson MnDOT Assistant State Traffic Engineer  Robert Wagner MnDOT Graduate Engineer  Tiffani Nielson Minnesota State Patrol  Jason Bartell Minnesota State Patrol  Cody Brand MnDOT District 8 Traffic Engineer  Tara Helm MnDOT West Metro Toward Zero Death Program Coordinator  Phil Olson City of Minnetonka City Engineer  Dan McCormick Carver County Traffic Services Supervisor  Douglas Carter MnDOT State Geometrics Engineer  Hannah Pritchard MnDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Engineer  William Stein FHWA Safety Engineer  27   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 6  Name Title   Andrew Emanuele FHWA Community Planner  Brandon Bourdon Kimley‐Horn Project Manager  Jack Olsson Kimley‐Horn Traffic Engineer  2 Background  This section provides an overview of the segments of Highway 7 included in the study area, prior studies, traffic  volumes, travel speeds, and an analysis of the crash data. This information provided the RSA team a foundation  of background information that increased the effectiveness of the RSA virtual review.   2.1 Corridor Traffic Volumes  Highway 7 is classified as a principal arterial along the entire study area. The average daily traffic along the  corridor varies from less than 10,000 vehicles per day (vpd) on the west end of the corridor to near 50,000 vpd  along the central‐east part of the corridor. Figure 2 shows how the average daily traffic changes along the entire  corridor.     Figure 2 Average Daily Traffic  2.2 Corridor Speeds  The posted speed limit on a majority of the corridor is 55 mph or higher. Portions of Highway 7 have lower  speed limits through cities or towns (e.g., Hopkins and St. Bonifacius). Figure 3 provides the posted speed limit in  miles per hour (mph) along the corridor.  28   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 7    Figure 3 Corridor Speed Limits  MnDOT completed a speed zone evaluation along Highway 7 in 2015 from the western boundary of Carver  County to Highway 100 in St. Louis Park. As part of this study, speed data was collected at approximately 30  locations along the corridor. This study led to changes in the posted speed limit at several locations, the result of  which are shown in Figure 3.   Additional speed data was collected at three locations along Highway 7 as part of this RSA. One doppler radar  sensor was placed along each of the three subsegments of the corridor for a three‐day period in December  2021. These sensors were utilized to measure the average and 85th percentile vehicle speeds in each direction.  This data was compared to the speed data collected by MnDOT in 2015 to understand speed trends along the  corridor. It should be noted that the speed limits at all three locations were raised by 5 mph between 2015 and  2021. A summary of this comparison is shown in Table 2.   Table 2 Corridor Speed Data Comparison  Highway 7 Location Direction 85th Percentile Speed  in 2015  85th Percentile Speed   in 2021  West of St. Bonifacius  Eastbound 60 mph 66 mph  Westbound 58 mph 65 mph  Shorewood   (West of Highway 41)  Eastbound 55 mph 59 mph  Westbound 56 mph 61 mph  Minnetonka  (East of I‐494)  Eastbound 62 mph 60 mph  Westbound 56 mph 60 mph  29   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 8  The 85th percentile speed increased by 4‐7 mph at all locations and in both directions except for eastbound  Highway 7 east of I‐494 which slightly decreased. In general, the 85th percentile speed was approximately 5 mph  higher than the posted speed limit. These changes in speed between 2015 and 2021 are expected based on the  increase in the posted speed limit that occurred after the speed data collection in 2015. The increase in vehicle  speeds closely corresponds to the change in posted speed limits along the corridor.   2.3 Relevant Plans and Studies  A review of planning studies recently constructed projects, and programmed projects was completed to ensure  prior work was considered as a part of the RSA. The following is a summary of that review:   2.3.1 Planning/Safety Studies  Trunk Highway 7 (TH 7) Safety Assessment Report (McLeod County)  MnDOT has been focused on improving safety throughout the State and along Highway 7. MnDOT District 8  recently completed a similar study of Highway 7 from Highway 22 near Hutchinson to the McLeod  County/Carver County line that is located west of this study. This study included a review of existing conditions  and crash history along the corridor and developed several recommendations for intersection‐ and segment‐ related improvements.  Arboretum Area Transportation Plan  This study, which was completed in early 2021, included a review of Rolling Acres Road which intersections  Highway 7 in Victoria. While Highway 7 was not the primary focus of the study, particular attention was given to  the intersection Highway 7 & Rolling Acres Road where concepts were developed. Both roadway vision concepts  developed as part of this study include the construction of a roundabout at Highway 7 & Rolling Acres Road. A  pedestrian underpass on the east leg of this intersection was also identified as potential future improvement.  These improvements were defined as mid‐term goals with a targeted implementation of 2027‐2031.   2020 Hennepin County Road Safety Plan  There are several intersections within the study area that have been identified as high‐risk intersections in  Hennepin County’s Road Safety Plan. These intersections and the improvements that were identified at each  location are described below.   Highway 7 & CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue: add confirmation lights   Highway 7 & CSAH 101: add advanced walk for pedestrians, update traffic signal, reduce intersection  skew, and remove free right‐turns.  Carver County: County Highway Safety Plan  Carver County completed a highway safety plan in 2013 as part of the Minnesota highway safety planning  process. This study identified three of the intersections within the study area of this RSA as high‐priority rural  intersections. These intersections and the improvements that were identified at each location are described  below.  30   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 9   Highway 7 & CR 33 (ranked #1 out of 69 locations): install street lights and improve signing and marking    Highway 7 & CSAH 23/CR 123 (ranked #6 out of 69 locations): install street lights and improve signing  and marking   Highway 7 & CSAH 11/Kings Point Road (ranked #10 out of 69 locations): install street lights  In addition to these intersections, the intersection of Highway 7 & CSAH 13/Smithtown Road was identified as a  high‐priority intersection for pedestrian/bicycle improvements (advanced walk and countdown timers) and for  right angle improvements (confirmation lights and flashing yellow arrows).   Hennepin County 2040 Bicycle Transportation Plan  In Hennepin County’s 2040 Bicycle Transportation Plan, several new trail corridors were identified that either  cross or connect to Highway 7. These include:   A regional trail corridor that would cross Highway 7 at County State Aid Highway 11 (CSAH 11)/Kings  Point Road/Victoria Drive between St. Bonifacius and Victoria. This trail would provide a connection  between the existing Dakota Rail Regional Trail to the north and the existing Lake Minnetonka LRT  Regional Trail to the south.   A trail corridor that would connect the Dakota Rail Regional Trail and the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional  Trail further to the east in Shorewood. This trail would connect to the existing Highway 7 and  Highway 41 intersection.   A trail corridor that would connect the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail to the Minnesota River Bluffs  LRT Regional Trail. This trail would follow Baker Road which is a grade‐separated crossing of Highway 7  just east of I‐494.   A trail corridor that would follow the Canadian Pacific corridor would be a grade‐separated crossing of  Highway 7 between Louisiana Avenue and Wooddale Avenue in St. Louis Park.  2.3.2 Recent Projects  Highway 7 and Old Market Road Intersection Improvements  In 2021, MnDOT began a project to make several updates along Highway 7 between Christmas Lake Road and  I‐494. As part of these improvements, there were several changes at the intersection of Highway 7 & Old Market  Road. These changes included replacing the traffic signal and removing the free northbound right‐turn at the  intersection. Figure 4 shows a pre‐construction and during‐construction aerial image at the intersection.   31   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 10    Figure 4 Highway 7 and Old Market Road ‐ April 2021 (Left) and May 2022 (Right)  Highway 7 Median Barrier Treatment  In addition to the improvements at Old Market Road, MnDOT also implemented improvements to the median  guardrails and barriers at several locations along Highway 7, including at CSAH 101, Tonkawood Road/Woodland  Road, and Williston Road. Figure 5 shows a pre‐construction and during‐construction aerial image at the  Williston Road intersection.     Figure 5 Highway 7 Median Barrier Improvements near Williston Road ‐ April 2021 (Left) and May 2022 (Right)  Highway 7 and Hopkins Crossroad Intersection Improvements  Intersection improvements were implemented in 2021 at the intersection of Highway 7 and Hopkins Crossroad  in Minnetonka. These improvements included installing a second eastbound left‐turn lane and removing the free  northbound and southbound right‐turns. Figure 6 shows a pre‐construction and during‐construction aerial  image at the intersection.   32   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 11    Figure 6 Highway 7 and Hopkins Crossroad ‐ April 2021 (Left) and May 2022 (Right)  2.3.3 Planned Projects  Highway 41 and Minnetonka Middle School West Intersection Improvements  Approximately one‐quarter mile south of the intersection of Highway 7 and Highway 41, the City of Chanhassen  has plans to construct a roundabout in 2024. This roundabout would be built at the intersection of Highway 41  and Minnetonka Middle School West access.    2.4 Crash Trends  A review of the historic crash data was completed to understand overall crash trends experienced along the  entire span of the corridor. Trends were evaluated for crashes of all severities and also for fatal and serious  injury crashes only.   2.4.1 All Crashes  Crash data from the last five years (2016‐2020) was reviewed to understand trends for crashes of all severities  that occurred along the Highway 7 corridor. Figure 7 shows the number of crashes that occurred each year by  crash severity. The data shows that a relatively consistent number of crashes occurred each year (within a 30%  increase or decrease in most cases). However, there was a significant decrease in the total number of crashes  that occurred in 2020 when compared to prior years, likely due to the decrease in traffic volumes on Highway 7  during the COVID‐19 pandemic. This trend in crashes by year has similarities to Minnesota statewide averages,  with 2019 experiencing the most crashes and 2020 experiencing the least crashes in the last five years.  33   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 12    Figure 7 Crashes per Year by Severity (2016‐2020)  Figure 8 shows the number of crashes that occurred each year by manner of collision. Front to rear (or rear end)  crashes were the most common type of crash, with more than 50% of crashes falling into this category. This high  percentage of rear end crashes is likely due to the large number of traffic signals along the study corridor.     Figure 8 Crashes by Manner of Collision (2016‐2020)  The number of crashes and their severity by intersection type are detailed in Figure 9. More than 50% of the  crashes in the study area were intersection related.  275 352 316 388 228 0 100 200 300 400 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Number of CrashesFatal Crash Serious Injury Crash Minor Injury Crash Possible Injury Crash Property Damage Only Crash 838 212 174 150 67 42 25 24 20 6 1 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Number of CrashesManner of Collision 34   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 13    Figure 9 Crashes by Intersection Type (2016‐2020)  2.4.2 Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes  To better understanding patterns related to the most severe crashes (i.e., fatal and serious injury crashes), crash  trends were analyzed separately for these types of crashes. In addition to the 2016‐2020 crashes along the  corridor, 2021 crash data through September 2021 was also included in the review and analysis for fatal and  serious injury crashes. This is all of the 2021 crash data that was available at the time of this study. The location  of the crashes along the corridor during this time period is shown in Figure 10.     Figure 10 Fatal and Serious Injury Crash Locations (January 2016 – September 2021)  Figure 11 shows the fatal and serious injury crashes along the study corridor by month. Over 50% of the crashes  occurred between the months of June and October which is similar to statewide trends. Additionally, five of the  fatal or serious injury crashes occurred in June 2021.  860 561 118 200 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Intersection Related Not at Intersection, Interchange or Junction Interchange or On/Off Ramp Other/UnknownNumber of CrashesIntersection Type Property Damage Only Crash Possible Injury Crash Minor Injury Crash Serious Injury Crash Fatal Crash 35   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 14    Figure 11 Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes by Month (January 2016 – September 2021)  Figure 12 shows a summary of the contributing factors for the high severity crashes. Over 25% of the fatal and  serious injury crashes along the corridor were caused by a vehicle disregarding the traffic control and running a  red light. This is much higher than the statewide average which showed that only 3% and 4% of fatal and injury  crashes, respectively, were caused by this in 2020.     Figure 12 Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes by Contributing Factor (January 2016 – September 2021)  1 2 1 3 11111 2 1 4 2 4 4 3 5 1 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Aug Sep Oct Nov DecNumber of CrashesSerious Injury Crash Fatal Crash 11 7 55 4 3 22 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Ran Red Light Improper Driving Maneuver, Failure to Yield Right‐of‐Way Operated Motor Vehicle in Careless, Negligent, or Erratic Manner Driver Distracted Ran‐Off‐ Road/Swerved to Avoid Conflict/Over‐ Correct Weather, Road Condition, Lighting Driver Speeding Other/UnknownNumber of CrashesContributing Factor 36   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 15  3 Crash Analysis   The three segments that the study corridor was divided into were split further into subsegments for the crash  analysis. A crash analysis was completed for these subsegments and all intersections along the corridor to  understand crash trends in more specific areas and to identify locations that may be experiencing safety  concerns. As described in Section 2.4, the crash data includes crashes of all severities along the corridor between  January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020 as well as all fatal and serious injury crashes occurring along the  corridor from January 2021 to September 2021.  There are several crash parameters that are used throughout this report:    Crash Rate:  There is a positive correlation between crash frequency and traffic volume. Crash rates  measure the number of crashes controlling for this exposure. For intersections, exposure is defined as  entering vehicles; for segments, exposure is defined as vehicle miles traveled.  The total crash rate is  defined as the number of crashes per million vehicle miles traveled (or entering vehicles for  intersections). The fatal and serious injury crash rate is defined as the number of fatal and incapacitating  injury crashes per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (or entering vehicles for intersections).    Critical Crash Rate:  Critical crash rates provide a statistical threshold for screening sites. The critical rate  is calculated by weighting the average crash rate for similar intersections or segments across Minnesota  by the existing traffic volume.    Critical Index:  A critical index is reported as the ratio of the observed crash rate to the critical crash rate.  A critical index exceeding 1.00 indicates there may be a safety concern at the site. When analyzing the  critical index, a value at or below 1.00 implies that the site does not deviate significantly from statewide  trends (i.e., it is performing within expectations).  The crash rate critical index is the total crash rate  divided by the critical crash rate for total crashes. Similarly, the fatal and serious injury critical index is  the fatal and serious injury crash rate divided by the critical crash rate for fatal and serious injury  crashes.    Additional information and formulas used to calculate these parameters are available in Chapter 11 ‐ Traffic  Safety of MnDOT’s Traffic Engineering Manual.  3.1 Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista  3.1.1 Segment Crash Analysis  The segment of Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista was divided into eight subsegments. These  subsegments, as well as all of the crashes occurring within them, are shown in Figure 13.   37   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 16    Figure 13 Segment Crashes: Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista  For each of the eight subsegments, a crash analysis was completed to understand the total crash rate and fatal  and serious crash rate and how the rates compared to similar facilities in Minnesota. Table 3 shows the total  number of crashes, the total crash rate and critical index, and the fatal and serious injury crash rate and critical  index for each subsegment. The critical rates and indices are based on 2020 Minnesota statewide averages.  Table 3: Subsegment Crash Rates: Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista  Subsegment  Total  Crashes  (2016‐ 2020)  Total Crash Rate1  (2016‐2020)  Fatal and Serious Injury  Crash Rate2  (2016 – September 2021)  Segment  Rate  Critical  Index  Segment  Rate  Critical  Index  Yale Avenue to CR 33 7 0.30 0.31 3.73 1.75  CR 33 to CSAH 23/CR 123 10 0.20 0.24 0.00 0.00  CSAH 23/CR 123 to Highway 25 6 0.49 0.43 0.00 0.00  Highway 25 to CSAH 10 15 0.39 0.44 2.26 1.14  CSAH 10 to Buck Lake Road 40 0.92 1.07 4.00 2.04  Buck Lake Road to   CSAH 92/Main Street 1 0.12 0.05 0.00 0.00  CSAH 92/Main Street to   CSAH 11/Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive 29 0.76 0.45 6.87 4.21  CSAH 11/Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive  to County Border (North of Lake  Zumbra)  29 0.55 0.34 3.27 2.10    1 Rate = Crashes per Million Vehicle Miles Traveled  2 Rate = Crashes per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled  38   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 17  The five subsegments where the critical index is higher than 1.0, shown in Figure 14 highlighted in red, were  focused on as part of the RSA. Segments with a critical index above 1 are segments where the total crash trend  is statistically higher than experienced on similar facilities in Minnesota.    Figure 14 Subsegments with a Critical Index higher than 1.0: Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista  Highway 7 from Yale Avenue to CR 33 had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 1.75. This critical index is due  to a single fatal head‐on crash that occurred as a result of a vehicle failing to stay in the travel lane. Besides the  single fatal crash, the rest of the crashes on the subsegment were all property damage only crashes.   Highway 7 from Highway 25 to CSAH 10 had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 1.14. Similar to the  subsegment of Highway 7 from Yale Avenue to CR 33, this critical index is due to a single fatal head‐on crash.  Besides the single fatal crash at the intersection, the rest were property damage only (83% of crashes) or minor  injury (8% of crashes).   Highway 7 from CSAH 10 to Buck Lake Road had a total critical index of 1.07 and a fatal and serious injury critical  index of 2.04. Of the crashes that have occurred on the subsegment, there has been one fatal crash and one  serious injury crash. The most common type of crash was single vehicle crashes (41% crashes) followed by deer  crashes (31% of crashes). Besides the deer‐related crashes, the most common contributing factors were  improper driving maneuver (21% of crashes), weather, road condition, or lighting (15% of crashes), and chemical  impairment (10% of crashes). The subsegment is straight with very few curves.  Highway 7 from CSAH 92/Main Street to CSAH 11/Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive had a fatal and serious injury  critical index of 4.21. There have been three serious injury crashes along this subsegment since 2016. Two of  these serious injury crashes occurred near intersections in St. Bonifacius, and most of the minor crashes  occurred near the roundabout at CSAH 11/Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive. The most common crash type was  front to rear crashes (31% of crashes) followed by single vehicle crashes (28% of crashes) and angle crashes (14%  of crashes).  39   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 18  Highway 7 from CSAH 11/Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive to County Border (North of Lake Zumbra) had a fatal  and serious injury critical index of 2.10. There has been one fatal crash and one serious injury crash, and the lead  contributing factor of crashes at the intersection were weather, road conditions, or lighting (24% of crashes) and  improper driving maneuver (17% crashes). Most of the crashes were front to rear crashes (21% of crashes),  single vehicle crashes (21% crashes), or sideswipe same direction crashes (14% of crashes).   3.1.2 Intersection Crash Analysis  For each of the 26 intersections along the Hollywood Township to Minnetrista Highway 7 segment, a crash  analysis was completed to understand the total crash rate and fatal and serious crash rate and how the rates  compared to similar facilities in Minnesota. Table 4 shows the total number of crashes, the total crash rate and  critical index, and the fatal and serious injury crash rate and critical index for each of the intersections. The  critical rates and indices are based on the 2020 Minnesota statewide averages.     40   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 19    Table 4: Intersection Crash Rates: Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista  Intersection  Total  Crashes  (2016‐ 2020)  Total Crash Rate3  (2016‐2020)  Fatal and Serious Injury  Crash Rate4  (2016 – September 2021)  Intersection  Rate  Critical  Index  Intersection  Rate  Critical  Index  Highway 7 & Yale Avenue 1 0.07 0.21 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & 53rd Street 2 0.14 0.42 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CR 33 7 0.35 1.21 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Vega Avenue 4 0.24 0.75 5.29 4.04  Highway 7 & Upland Avenue 1 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CSAH 21 2 0.12 0.39 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Tacoma Avenue 1 0.06 0.19 5.29 4.04  Highway 7 & CSAH 23/CR 123 4 0.25 0.78 5.36 4.09  Highway 7 & Highway 25 11 0.50 0.43 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Polk Avenue 1 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CSAH 10 11 0.43 0.38 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CR 155 1 0.05 0.17 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Hunters Trail/  Wildwood Avenue 2 0.10 0.29 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Maplewood Road (East) 1 0.05 0.15 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Tower Street 4 0.21 0.62 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CSAH 92/Main Street 19 0.53 0.64 2.42 1.98  Highway 7 & Bell Street 6 0.25 0.78 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Steiner Street 2 0.08 0.25 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Highland Road 7 0.26 0.84 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Viking Road 1 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Grimm Road 1 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Upland Farm Road 1 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Oak Road 2 0.08 0.25 3.67 4.48  Highway 7 & CSAH 11/Kings Point Road 17 0.60 0.55 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CSAH 44 17 0.55 0.64 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Merrywood Lane 1 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.00  Note: Intersections with 0 recorded crashes during the analysis periods were excluded from the table above.  There is one intersection where the total crash rate critical index is higher than 1.0 and five intersections where  the fatal and serious injury critical index is higher than 1.0 that were focused on as part of the RSA. The six  intersections with a critical index higher than 1.0 are shown in Figure 15. Because the critical index at these    3 Rate = Crashes per Million Entering Vehicles  4 Rate = Crashes per 100 Million Entering Vehicles  41   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 20  intersections is higher than 1.0, these are intersections where the total crash trend is statistically higher than  experienced on similar facilities in Minnesota.     Figure 15 Intersections with a Critical Index higher than 1.0: Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista  The intersection of Highway 7 and CR 33 had a total critical index of 1.21. Of the 7 total crashes at the  intersection, 6 of them were angle crashes. This intersection is side street stop‐controlled and is located on a  horizontal curve. There is currently a rural intersection conflict warning system (RICWS) at the intersection to  alert drivers approaching CR 33 on Highway 7 and drivers waiting to enter the intersection from CR 33. It should  be noted that a fatal crash occurred at the intersection of Highway 7 & CR 33 in April of 2022. This crash is not  represented in the data in this study because it occurred outside of the analysis period. This crash was an  angle crash that involved a northbound vehicle that failed to yield the right‐of‐way to a vehicle that was  westbound on Highway 7.  The intersection of Highway 7 and Vega Avenue had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 4.04. This critical  index is due to a single serious injury single vehicle crash that occurred at the intersection. This crash was caused  by a vehicle that swerved off the road to avoid a vehicle that was waiting to turn left from Highway 7.    The intersection of Highway 7 and Tacoma Avenue had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 4.04. This  critical index is due to a single serious injury crash. There have been no other crashes at the intersection in the  last five years.  The intersection of Highway 7 and CSAH 23/CR 123 had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 4.09. This  critical index is due to a single fatal crash that occurred at the intersection in which a vehicle on the northbound  approach failed to yield the right‐of‐way. The three other crashes that have occurred at the intersection were all  property damage only.  The intersection of Highway 7 and CSAH 92/Main Street had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 1.98. Over  half of the crashes at this intersection are possible injury crashes or more severe crashes. The most common  crash type at the intersection was front to rear crashes (50% of crashes) followed by angle crashes (27% of  crashes). The contributing factor for just under half of the crashes was failure to obey traffic signs, signals, rules,  right‐of‐way or officer (41% of crashes). Distracted driving and improper driving maneuver were the second and  third most common contributing factor (18% of crashes each).  42   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 21  The intersection of Highway 7 and Oak Road had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 4.48. Only 2 crashes  have occurred at the intersection in the last five years, both of which were front to rear crashes. One of the  crashes was a serious injury crash.   3.2 Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka  3.2.1 Segment Crash Analysis  The segment of Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka was divided into eight subsegments. These  subsegments, as well as all of the crashes occurring within them, are shown in Figure 16.     Figure 16 Segment Crashes: Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka  For each of the eight subsegments, a crash analysis was completed to understand the total crash rate and fatal  and serious crash rate and how the rates compared to similar facilities in Minnesota. Table 5 shows the total  number of crashes, the total crash rate and critical index, and the fatal and serious injury crash rate and critical  index for each subsegment. The critical rates and indices are based on 2020 Minnesota statewide averages.     43   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 22  Table 5: Subsegment Crash Rates: Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka  Subsegment  Total  Crashes  (2016‐ 2020)  Total Crash Rate5  (2016‐2020)  Fatal and Serious Injury  Crash Rate6  (2016 – September 2021)  Segment  Rate  Critical  Index  Segment  Rate  Critical  Index  County Border (north of Lake Zumbra) to  CSAH 13/Smithtown Road 10 0.48 0.26 4.17 2.33  CSAH 13/Smithtown Road to  Minnewashta Parkway/Church Road 5 0.18 0.10 0.00 0.00  Minnewashta Parkway/Church Road to  County Border (west of Eureka Road) 3 0.36 0.16 0.00 0.00  County Border (west of Eureka Road)   to Hazeltine Blvd/Lake Linden Drive 16 0.93 0.49 5.07 2.74  Highway 41/Hazeltine Blvd/Lake Linden  Drive to CSAH 19/Oak Street 18 0.82 0.15 0.00 0.00  CSAH 19/Oak Street to   Highway 7 Excelsior Westbound   Off‐Ramp  7 0.60 0.10 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 Excelsior Westbound Off‐ Ramp   to Vine Hill Road  31 0.38 0.06 0.00 0.00  Vine Hill Road to CSAH 101 36 0.43 0.07 4.20 2.49  The three subsegments where the critical index is higher than 1.0, shown in Figure 17 highlighted in red, were  focused on as part of the RSA. Segments with a critical index above 1 are segments where the total crash trend  is statistically higher than experienced on similar facilities in Minnesota.    5 Rate = Crashes per Million Vehicle Miles Traveled  6 Rate = Crashes per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled  44   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 23    Figure 17 Subsegments with a Critical Index higher than 1.0: Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka  Highway 7 from County Border (north of Lake Zumbra) to CSAH 13/Smithtown Road had a fatal and serious  injury critical index of 2.33. This critical index is due to a single fatal crash that occurred as a result of a  westbound vehicle crossing the centerline and being hit by another vehicle. The most common crash type along  this subsegment was single vehicle crashes (41% of crashes) followed by front to rear crashes (35% of crashes).  Highway 7 from County Border (west of Eureka Road) to Hazeltine Blvd/Lake Linden Drive had a fatal and serious  injury critical index of 2.74. The critical index is due to a single serious injury crash that occurred when a person  was hit while they were waiting for help after crashing into a guardrail. The most common crash type along this  subsegment was front to rear crashes (29% of crashes) and deer crashes (29% of crashes). The most common  crash contributing factor was improper driving maneuver (43% of crashes). Over 75% of crashes along the  subsegment were property damage only. Left‐ and right‐turn lanes are provided at all intersections along this  subsegment.   Highway 7 from Vine Hill Road to CSAH 101 had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 2.49. There were two  fatal crashes and two serious injury crashes that have occurred on this subsegment over the last five years. One  of the fatal crashes involved a pedestrian that was struck by a vehicle that was rear‐ended at full speed and the  other fatal crash was a head‐on crash. One of the serious injury crashes involved a motorcycle that lost control  due to road conditions and struck a pole. Of all the crashes along the subsegment, 44% of the crashes were front  to rear and 31% of the crashes were single vehicle crashes.  3.2.2 Intersection Crash Analysis  For each of the 26 intersections along the Minnetrista to Minnetonka Highway 7 segment, a crash analysis was  completed to understand the total crash rate and fatal and serious crash rate and how the rates compared to  similar facilities in Minnesota. Table 6 shows the total number of crashes, the total crash rate and critical index,  and the fatal and serious injury crash rate and critical index for each of the intersections. The critical rates and  indices are based on the 2020 Minnesota statewide averages.  45   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 24  Table 6: Intersection Crash Rates: Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka  Intersection  Total  Crashes  (2016‐ 2020)  Total Crash Rate7  (2016‐2020)  Fatal and Serious Injury  Crash Rate8  (2016 – September 2021)  Intersection  Rate  Critical  Index  Intersection  Rate  Critical  Index  Highway 7 & Zumbra Drive 1 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Baycliffe Drive 1 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Virginia Drive 1 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Hawks Pointe Lane 2 0.07 0.24 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CSAH 13/Smithtown Road 19 0.50 0.61 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Foxglove Cir 1 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Lake Virginia Trail 3 0.12 0.38 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Leslee Curve 1 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Minnewashta Parkway/  Church Road 11 0.37 1.28 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Greenbriar Avenue 2 0.06 0.21 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Shorewood Oaks Drive 1 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Dogwood Avenue 1 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Eureka Road 7 0.20 0.71 2.48 3.31  Highway 7 & Arbor Lane 2 0.06 0.21 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Sandpiper Trail 1 0.03 0.11 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Oriole Avenue 1 0.06 0.17 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Highway 41 38 0.64 0.74 4.37 3.77  Highway 7 & Water Street/Chaska Road 18 0.37 1.48 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Galpin Lake Road 11 0.43 1.39 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CSAH 19/Oak Street 47 0.71 0.84 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Elm Place 5 0.17 0.59 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Morse Avenue 9 0.30 1.03 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Christmas Lake Road 34 0.45 0.54 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Old Market Road 23 0.30 0.36 1.12 1.00  Highway 7 & Vine Hill Road 36 0.46 0.55 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Lynwood Terrace 3 0.08 0.30 0.00 0.00  Note: Intersections with 0 recorded crashes during the analysis periods were excluded from the table above.  There are four intersections where the total crash rate critical index is higher than 1.0 and three intersections  where the fatal and serious injury critical index is higher than 1.0 that were focused on as part of the RSA. The  seven intersections with a critical index higher than 1.0 are shown in Figure 18. Because the critical index at    7 Rate = Crashes per Million Entering Vehicles  8 Rate = Crashes per 100 Million Entering Vehicles  46   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 25  these intersections is higher than 1.0, these are intersections where the total crash trend is statistically higher  than experienced on similar facilities in Minnesota.     Figure 18 Intersections with a Critical Index higher than 1.0: Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka  The intersection of Highway 7 and Minnewashta Parkway/Church Road had a total critical index of 1.28. The  skew of the intersection creates challenges for vehicles on the cross street. In fact, over half of the crashes at  this intersection were related to vehicles trying to enter or cross Highway 7 from the Minnewashta Parkway or  Church Road approaches. 15% of the crashes at the intersection involved a deer. There have not been any fatal  or serious injury crashes at this intersection in the last five years.  The intersection of Highway 7 and Eureka Road had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 3.31. This critical  index is due to a single fatal crash that occurred at the intersection. The fatal crash was an angle crash where a  southbound vehicle on Eureka Road failed to yield the right‐of‐way to a motorcyclist that was traveling  westbound of Highway 7. Half of the crashes at this intersection were angle crashes.  The intersection of Highway 7 and Highway 41 had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 3.77. Two serious  injury crashes occurred at this intersection. Both of these serious injury crashes were angle crashes involving  eastbound left‐turning vehicles that collided with vehicles westbound on Highway 7. The most common crash  types at this intersection were front to rear crashes (65% of crashes) followed by angle crashes (17% of crashes).  There is significant traffic on the north leg of the intersection because it provides access to a grocery store and  retail area. About 700 feet west of the intersection, Highway 7 transitions from four lanes to two lanes.  The intersection of Highway 7 and Water Street/Chaska Road had a total critical index of 1.48. A large majority  of the crashes at this intersection were property damage only (82% of crashes) and front to rear crashes (71% of  crashes). Water Street/Chaska Road intersects Highway 7 at a skew which likely creates some challenges with  vehicles entering and exiting Highway 7.   47   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 26  The intersection of Highway 7 and Galpin Lake Road had a total critical index of 1.39. This intersection is a right‐ in right‐out intersection approximately 500 feet west of Highway 7 and Oak Street. The influence area of this  intersection likely impacts the operations at Galpin Lake Road due to its proximity. 75% of the crashes were  front to rear crashes.  The intersection of Highway 7 and Morse Avenue had a total critical index of 1.03. This intersection is also a  right‐in right‐out intersection. Of the nine crashes at the intersection, 33% of them were angle crashes and 33%  were front to rear crashes. Additionally, the contributing factor of 33% of the crashes was chemical impairment  and improper driving maneuver was the contributing factor of another 33% of crashes at the intersection.   The intersection of Highway 7 and Old Market Road had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 1.00. There  was one serious injury crash at the intersection that occurred in 2019. 74% of the crashes at this intersection  were front to rear crashes. The leading contributing factor of crashes at this intersection were related to  distracted driving (30% of crashes) and improper driving maneuver (22% of crashes). As described in Section  2.3.2, several improvements were recently implemented at this intersection.  3.3 Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park  3.3.1 Segment Crash Analysis  The segment of Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park was divided into nine subsegments. These  subsegments, as well as all of the crashes occurring within them, are shown in Figure 19.     Figure 19 Segment Crashes: Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park  For each of the nine subsegments, a crash analysis was completed to understand the total crash rate and fatal  and serious crash rate and how the rates compared to similar facilities in Minnesota. Table 7 shows the total  number of crashes, the total crash rate and critical index, and the fatal and serious injury crash rate and critical  index for each subsegment. The critical rates and indices are based on 2020 Minnesota statewide averages.  48   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 27  Table 7: Subsegment Crash Rates: Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park  Subsegment  Total  Crashes  (2016‐ 2020)  Total Crash Rate9  (2016‐2020)  Fatal and Serious Injury  Crash Rate10  (2016 – September 2021)  Segment  Rate  Critical  Index  Segment  Rate  Critical  Index  CSAH 101 to Williston Road 43 0.43 0.07 0.00 0.00  Williston Road to I‐494 9 0.29 0.04 0.00 0.00  I‐494 to CSAH 61/Shady Oak Road 7 0.38 0.07 0.00 0.00  CSAH 61/Shady Oak Road to 5th  Avenue/Oakridge Road 11 0.27 0.04 0.00 0.00  5th Avenue/Oakridge Road to US 169 5 0.40 0.05 6.92 3.14  US 169 to CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila  Avenue 18 0.79 0.11 0.00 0.00  CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue to  Louisiana Avenue Ramps (East Terminal) 40 1.64 0.23 7.12 3.63  Louisiana Avenue Ramps (East Terminal)  to Wooddale Avenue Ramps   (East Terminal)  3 0.43 0.07 0.00 0.00  Wooddale Avenue Ramps (East  Terminal) to West of Highway 100 3 0.47 0.07 0.00 0.00  The two subsegments where the critical index is higher than 1.0, shown in Figure 20 highlighted in red, were  focused on as part of the RSA. Segments with a critical index above 1 are segments where the total crash trend  is statistically higher than experienced on similar facilities in Minnesota.    9 Rate = Crashes per Million Vehicle Miles Traveled  10 Rate = Crashes per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled  49   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 28    Figure 20 Subsegments with a Critical Index higher than 1.0: Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park  Highway 7 from 5th Avenue/Oakridge Road to US 169 had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 3.14. This  critical index is due to a fatal crash that occurred when a single vehicle ran off the road and hit a signal pole. The  most common crash type along this subsegment was front to rear crashes (75% of crashes). The primary  contributing factor of most crashes was improper driving maneuver (50% of crashes). Besides the fatal crash, the  other crashes at the intersection were either possible injury crashes (25% of crashes) or property damage only  (63% of crashes).  Highway 7 from CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue to Louisiana Avenue Ramps (East Terminal) had a fatal and  serious injury critical index of 3.63. This critical index is due to two serious injury crashes that occurred along the  subsegment. Both of these crashes were front to rear crashes that occurred as a result of congestion on  westbound Highway 7. Of all the crashes along the subsegment, 59% of the crashes were front to rear and 25%  of the crashes were single vehicle crashes. Crashes on this subsegment were disproportionately higher in 2017  compared to the other four years, with 33% of crashes occurring in this year.  3.3.2 Intersection Crash Analysis  For each of the 19 intersections along the Minnetonka to St. Louis Park Highway 7 segment, a crash analysis was  completed to understand the total crash rate and fatal and serious crash rate and how the rates compared to  similar facilities in Minnesota. Table 8 shows the total number of crashes, the total crash rate and critical index,  and the fatal and serious injury crash rate and critical index for each of the intersections. The critical rates and  indices are based on the 2020 Minnesota statewide averages.     50   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 29  Table 8: Intersection Crash Rates: Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park  Intersection  Total  Crashes  (2016‐ 2020)  Total Crash Rate11  (2016‐2020)  Fatal and Serious Injury  Crash Rate12  (2016 – September 2021)  Intersection  Rate  Critical  Index  Intersection  Rate  Critical  Index  Highway 7 & CSAH 101 63 0.54 0.68 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Saddlewood Drive 3 0.07 0.26 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Temple Road 2 0.05 0.19 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Linnea Lane 3 0.07 0.26 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Woodland  Road/Tonkawood Road 20 0.23 0.28 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Highland Road 3 0.04 0.18 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Williston Road 61 0.62 0.77 2.65 2.43  Highway 7 & Woodhill Road 14 0.15 0.71 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Kings Drive 3 0.07 0.27 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CSAH 61/Shady Oak Road 18 0.26 0.31 1.24 1.10  Highway 7 & 21st Avenue 1 0.04 0.13 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & CSAH 73/Hopkins  Crossroad 39 0.55 0.65 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & 12th Avenue 17 0.31 0.36 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & 5th Avenue/Oakridge Road 30 0.47 0.55 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & US 169 Southbound   Off‐Ramp 11 0.16 0.19 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & US 169 Northbound Ramps 26 0.33 0.40 2.20 1.96  Highway 7 & CSAH 20/Blake Road/  Aquila Avenue 107 1.08 1.35 0.00 0.00  Highway 7 & Texas Avenue 102 1.55 1.82 5.29 4.64  Highway 7 & Highway 100 Southbound  On‐Ramp 13 0.23 0.26 0.00 0.00  Note: Intersections with 0 recorded crashes during the analysis periods were excluded from the table above.  There are two intersections where the total crash rate critical index is higher than 1.0 and four intersections  where the fatal and serious injury critical index is higher than 1.0 that were focused on as part of the RSA. One  of the intersections had both a total crash rate critical index and a fatal and serious injury critical index higher  than 1.0. The intersections with a critical index higher than 1.0 are shown in Figure 21. Because the critical index  at these intersections is higher than 1.0, these are intersections where the total crash trend is statistically higher  than experienced on similar facilities in Minnesota.       11 Rate = Crashes per Million Entering Vehicles  12 Rate = Crashes per 100 Million Entering Vehicles  51   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 30    Figure 21 Intersections with a Critical Index higher than 1.0: Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park  The intersection of Highway 7 and Williston Road had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 2.43. This critical  index is due to three serious injury crashes that occurred at the intersection. Two of the serious injury crashes  were angle crashes between an eastbound left‐turning vehicle and a westbound through vehicle. The third  serious injury crash was a front to rear crash that occurred on the westbound approach of the intersection.  Nearly all of the crashes occurred during daylight hours (92% of crashes). Front to rear crashes were the most  common crash type at the intersection (70% of crashes). The most common contributing factors were improper  driving maneuvers (31% of crashes), distracted driving (15% of crashes), and failure to obey traffic signs, signals,  rules, right‐of‐way, or officer (13% of crashes). Williston Road experiences high traffic volumes when compared  to other cross streets along the study corridor with an average daily traffic volume of 7,300 vpd on the north leg  and 6,500 vpd on the south leg.  The intersection of Highway 7 and Shady Oak Road had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 1.10. This  critical index is due to two serious injury crashes that occurred at the intersection. One of these crashes was due  to an eastbound vehicle running a red light which collided with a vehicle making a westbound left‐turn  movement. The other serious injury crash was due to slippery pavement conditions. Similar to other locations  along the study corridor, a majority of crashes were front to rear crashes (64% of crashes). The south leg of the  intersection experiences high traffic volumes (13,400 vpd).  The intersection of Highway 7 and US 169 Northbound Ramps had a fatal and serious injury critical index of 1.96.  This critical index is due to two serious injury crashes that occurred at the intersection. Both of these crashes  involved vehicles running the traffic signal at the intersection. Front to rear crashes were the most common  crash type (45% of crashes) followed by angle crashes (33% of crashes) and single vehicle crashes (10% of  crashes). The leading contributing factors were improper driving maneuver (29% of crashes), failure to obey  traffic signs, signals, rules, right‐of‐way, or officer (26% of crashes), and weather, road conditions, or lighting  (14% of crashes).  The intersection of Highway 7 and CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue had a total critical index of 1.35. There  have been no fatal or serious injury crashes at this intersection in the last year, and 74% of crashes were  property damage only, 21% were possible injury crashes, and 5% were minor injury crashes. Front to rear  52   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 31  crashes were the most common crash type at the intersection (63% of crashes). Compared to other  intersections along the corridor, this intersection experienced proportionately more crashes outside of daylight  hours (27% of crashes).  The intersection of Highway 7 and Texas Avenue had a total critical index of 1.82 and a fatal and serious injury  critical index of 4.64. There has been one fatal crash and three serious injury crashes at the intersection. Most of  these crashes were due to vehicles following too closely or vehicle running red lights. The fatal crash involved a  pedestrian that was crossing the west leg of the intersection. Similar to the Highway 7 and CSAH 20/Blake  Road/Aquila Avenue intersection, a higher number of crashes occurred at this intersection outside of daylight  hours (32% of crashes). A higher proportion of crashes occurred at the intersection in the year 2019 (31% of  crashes). There were several improvements made to the intersection around 2018‐2019 that included adding  bicycle lanes on Texas Avenue.   4 Public Engagement  Several opportunities for public comment and feedback were given throughout the project. Between December  17, 2021 and January 20, 2022, questions and comments were able to be provided on an interactive map and  feedback was received from a survey. This survey was provided both online on the project website as well as  offline at several public locations throughout the corridor (see Table 9). Offline engagement locations included  project materials that provided information about the project and a link to the project website. Additionally,  links to the project website were shared over social media by MnDOT and several of the cities along the project  corridor.   Table 9: Locations of Offline Public Engagement Materials  City Location Address  St. Louis Park Central Community Center 6300 Walker St, St. Louis Park, MN 55416  St. Louis Park St. Louis Park Library 3240 Library Ln, St Louis Park, MN 55426  Minnetonka Williston Fitness Center 14509 Minnetonka Dr, Minnetonka, MN 55345  Minnetonka Minnetonka City Hall/ Community Center 14600 Minnetonka Blvd, Minnetonka, MN 55345  Minnetonka Minnetonka Library 17524 Excelsior Blvd, Minnetonka, MN 55345  Excelsior Excelsior Library 337 Water St, Excelsior, MN 55331  Shorewood Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Rd, Shorewood, MN 55331  Shorewood Shorewood Community & Event Center 5735 Country Club Rd, Shorewood, MN 55331  Chanhassen Chanhassen Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Blvd, Chanhassen, MN 55317  Victoria Victoria City Hall 1670 Stieger Lake Ln, Victoria, MN 55386  Mayer Mayer Community Center 413 Bluejay Ave N, Mayer, MN 55360  Lester Prairie Lester Prairie City Hall 37 Juniper St N, Lester Prairie, MN 55354  Outside of the interactive map and survey, several emails and phone calls were received by the project team. In  addition to the public comments received, the City of St. Louis Park and the City of Greenwood submitted formal  letters to MnDOT providing specific corridor input within and near their respective city (letters included in  53   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 32  Appendix A). Additionally, an online open house was provided where a recorded presentation was able to be  viewed. The presentation provided an overview of the road safety audit process, study area, crash trends, and  next steps.  Over 1,000 responses were received between the survey and interactive map. Results from the interactive map  and the survey are summarized below.  4.1 Interactive Map  There were 104 interactive map comments that were received for the segment between Hollywood Township  and Minnetrista. Some general themes from these comments were a desire for different intersection control  (i.e., not side‐street stop control) and more roundabouts, nighttime visibility issues, and traffic signal timing  issues. Locations along this segment where the most comments were made included:   Highway 7 & Hunters Trail/Wildwood Avenue (24 Comments)  o Perceived as a dangerous intersection  o Several commentors expressed a desire for a roundabout in this location.  There were 566 interactive map comments that were received for the segment between Minnetrista and  Minnetonka. Some general themes from these comments were a desire for different intersection control (i.e.,  not side‐street stop control) and more roundabouts or lights, a need for more safe pedestrian crossings, and  several locations were identified where making a left turn is difficult. Locations along this segment where the  most comments were made included:   Highway 7 & Minnewashta Parkway/Church Road (100 Comments)  o Perceived as a dangerous intersection  o Better traffic control is needed  o Desire for safer bike/pedestrian crossing   Highway 7 & Eureka Road (110 Comments)  o Dangerous conditions, especially during sporting events at Freeman Park  o Different intersection control measures should be considered in this location (e.g., signal,  roundabout, etc.).   Highway 7 & Highway 41 (30 Comments)  o Rush hour congestion creates hazardous traffic conditions  o Desire for safe bike/pedestrian crossings  o Roadway geometrics at this intersection should be reviewed   Highway 7 & Galpin Lake Road/Oak Street (53 Comments)  o Desire for safe bike/pedestrian crossings in this area  There were 162 interactive map comments that were received for the segment between Minnetonka and St.  Louis Park. General themes from these comments were both an identified need for safer pedestrian crossings  near several destinations including Eisenhower Community Center, Minnetonka High School, and Knollwood  Mall and challenges seeing the traffic light when approaching the Texas Avenue intersection. Locations along  this segment where the most comments were made included:   Highway 7 near the Shoppes at Knollwood (24 Comments)  54   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 33  o Visibility issues for westbound drivers on Highway 7 as they approach Texas Avenue  o Several residents identified challenges obtaining access onto Highway 7 in this area  o Difficult pedestrian crossings exist at the CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue and Texas Avenue  intersections  These comments were categorized using the following criteria (see Table 10):   General Dangerous Conditions Identified: Comments that identified areas of perceived dangerous  conditions   Pedestrian Improvement Needed: Comments that identified areas of desired bike/pedestrian  infrastructure improvements or issues   Intersection Control Issue Identified: Comments suggesting different intersection control measures   Roadway Issue Identified: Comments related to roadway geometry or lanes   Hazardous Driving Conditions/Visibility: Comments that identified areas of hazardous driving conditions  or visibility issues   Other: Comments that do not fit into the above categories  Table 10: Interactive Map Comments Received  Area General  Dangerous  Conditions  Identified Pedestrian  Improvement  Needed Intersection  Control  Issue  Identified Roadway  Issue  identified Hazardous  Driving  Conditions/  Visibility Other Total Hollywood  Township  to  Minnetrista 18 2 41 13 18 12 104 Minnetrista  to  Minnetonka 134 108 111 133 37 43 566 Minnetonka  to St. Louis  Park 9 24 29 56 19 25 162 Outside of  Corridor 4 3 6 0 0 5 18 This feedback was considered along with the recommendations from the road safety audit team as the potential  improvement strategies in Section 6 were developed.   4.2 Survey Demographic Responses:  Several demographic‐related questions were included as part of the survey. A summary of the responses is  provided below (404 total responses):   Gender Identity: Female: 56.8%, Male: 37.7%, Other/No Response: 5.4%  55   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 34   Background/Ethnicity: Caucasian: 95.3%, Asian: 1.3%, Hispanic or Latino: 1.0%, American Indian or  Alaska Native: 0.5%, Black or African American: 0.3%, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander: 0.3%, Other:  1.3%    Age:  45‐54: 25.9%, 35‐44: 25.5%, 55‐64: 25.2%, 65+: 15.8%, 25‐34: 6.9%, 18‐24: 1.2%, Under 18: Less  than 0.1%    Zip Code: 55331: 60.6%, 55345: 10.6%, 55426: 5.0%, 55343: 4.9%, 55416: 3.0%, 55360: 3.0%, 55317:  2.5%, Other: 13.1%  5 Road Safety Audit Process  The RSA review team met to complete a virtual field review of the corridor in February 2022. Prior to the  meeting, review team members were encouraged to drive the roadways in the study area, note items that could  impact safety, and come prepared to discuss these items.    As part of the field review, an overview of the corridor was provided and then roadway segments and  intersections of interest were reviewed and discussed. The primary focus was on segments and intersections  where the critical index was higher than 1.0 for either the total crash rate or fatal and serious injury crash rate.  Other locations that were not identified as critical locations, but where there has been considerable concern  based on public input, were also discussed. Crash trends were summarized at these each of these locations to  understand if there were certain patterns related to crash type, lighting, contributing factor, etc. Additionally, a  more in‐depth review was provided for fatal and serious injury crashes (i.e., reviewing the crash narrative).   Due to the length of the study corridor, the road safety audit required three separate meetings. The three  meetings included:   February 3rd, 2022: virtual field review of Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetonka   February 14th, 2022: virtual field review of Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park   February 18th, 2022: review of road safety audit discussion and recommendations  To conduct the virtual RSA, Kimley‐Horn provided dashcam video recorded along each of the three segments.  Aerial imagery and Google Street View were also utilized during the field review to provide additional viewpoints  of particular segments and intersections. Any issues identified by the RSA team related to geometry, the  surrounding environment, infrastructure, or other subjects were documented for each segment and intersection  in addition to any potential improvements.  6 Potential Improvements Summary  Recommended potential improvement strategies were organized into three categories: short‐, medium‐, and  long‐term. These strategies were organized into a corridor‐wide, segment‐wide, or specific roadway segment or  intersection basis. They were based on an analysis of the crash data, review of existing conditions, input from  the RSA team, and comments received from the public. Short‐term strategies can typically be implemented  during a shorter timeframe (i.e., less than five years) because they are simpler to implement, cost less, and often  can be completed with maintenance forces. Medium‐term strategies will take longer because their  implementation requires additional study and design and typically cost more. These strategies often can be  56   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 35  implemented on a five to ten‐year horizon. Long‐term strategies are even more complex, require significant  funding, and usually take longer than 10 years to implement.   It is important to note that even though a potential improvement strategy is listed, it may never be  implemented. This could occur for a variety of reasons that may include an inability to obtain consensus, a more  extensive improvement is implemented (i.e., if a four‐lane section is constructed then a three‐lane section may  not be built), lack of funding, improvement is not selected for funding as part of a competitive funding  solicitation, or changes in crash trends or design standards (e.g., automated vehicles result in improved safety).   6.1 Corridor‐wide Initiatives  One non‐location specific suggestion that was discussed during the road safety audit was to create a Highway 7  Corridor Coalition. The Highway 7 corridor serves many cities, towns, and communities and is an important  highway within the Minneapolis‐St. Paul metropolitan area. Additionally, the character of the roadway rapidly  changes between St. Louis Park and Hollywood Township, and grade‐separation, intersection control, and  roadway treatments are inconsistent along the corridor. Within the study area, the Highway 7 corridor has  unique challenges due to its curvy‐nature and because several neighborhoods only point of access is on  Highway 7. Forming a coalition for the corridor would provide a forum that would help agencies more effectively  advocate for improvements and associated funding. This has been an effective approach that has been utilized  for other corridors to obtain and implement corridor wide improvements.    6.2 Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista  A map that shows the locations for the improvements and suggestions that were discussed during the road  safety audit is shown in Figure 22 for the Highway 7 segment between Hollywood Township and Minnetrista.  The actual improvements are detailed in Table 11 with the corresponding ID number to the Figure 22 map.   Specific locations and improvements where additional discussion is needed are provided below. 57  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       36  Figure 22 Improvement Summary Map: Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista  58  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       37 Table 11 Improvement Strategies: Highway 7 from Hollywood Township to Minnetrista ID Subsegment/ Intersection Location Short‐Term Medium‐Term Long‐Term ‐ ‐ Segment‐wide Install advanced street name signs at all intersections Complete corridor study from west extent to CSAH 10: ‐ Determine long‐term desired typical section  ‐ Potential options (currently is a two‐lane with alternating passing lanes): 2+1 w/ buffer,  2+1 w/o buffer or barrier in median, 4‐lane section,  3‐lane section w/ left‐turn lanes Fund & construct improvements recommended in corridor studies 1 Subsegment Yale Avenue to CR 33 Add delineators/reference posts at curve; Enhanced curve signing  Install centerline rumble strips (consider sinusoidal) Potentially close access at  53rd Street 2 Intersection Highway 7 & CR 33 Begin Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Report Install slotted right‐turn lanes and markings; Monitor to determine if  control changes justified  (e.g., roundabout) Fund and reconstruct intersection if justified based on ICE recommendations 3 Intersection Highway 7 & Vega Avenue Install advanced street name signs  Install lighting ‐  4 Intersection Highway 7 & Tacoma Avenue Install advanced street name signs Install lighting Fix minor roadway approaches 5 Intersection Highway 7 & CSAH 23/ CR 123 Install advanced trailblazing  Install additional lighting Implement access control or relocate intersection west to remove skew 6 Subsegment Highway 25 to CSAH 10 ‐  Install centerline rumble strips (consider sinusoidal); Study segment to determine  long‐term desired typical section  Change section of roadway if study recommends improvements 7 Subsegment CSAH 10 to Buck Lake Road Review corridor to determine turn lane locations Clean‐up clear zone Implement access control measures (e.g., private drive consolidation and local roads); Construct turn lanes 8 Intersection Hwy 7 & Hunters Trail/Wildwood Avenue  ‐ Restrict to 3/4 access and provide pedestrian crossing w/ refuge Implement gateway treatment into St. Bonifacius  (e.g., roundabout) 59  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       38 ID Subsegment/ Intersection Location Short‐Term Medium‐Term Long‐Term 9 Subsegment CSAH 92/Main Street to CSAH 11/ Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive Complete corridor study from Wildwood Avenue to  Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive: ‐ Potentially more urban feel in  St. Bonifacius  ‐ Potential 3‐lane section ‐ Identify potential access control/consolidation  ‐ Fund and implement improvements from study 10 Intersection Hwy 7 & CSAH 92 Main Street Increase enforcement of red light running Construct pedestrian facilities on the north side of Highway 7  (continue trail); Monitor to determine if  intersection control changes are justified (e.g., roundabout); Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility  (e.g., add signal enforcement confirmation lights; yellow retroreflective back‐plates were recently installed) Fund and construct raised concrete median on Highway 7  near intersection; Make roadway section through the intersection have more  of an urban feel; Fund and reconstruct intersection along with revised typical section if justified  11 Intersection Hwy 7 & Oak Road ‐  Replace by‐pass lane with  left‐turn lane Restrict access or potentially remove intersection 12 Subsegment CSAH 11/Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive to County Border (North of Lake Zumbra) Complete corridor study: ‐ Is center median or buffer required? ‐ Locations where the shoulder should be balanced  (bikers & increase safety)   ‐ Fund and implement improvements from study  60   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 39  6.2.1 Segment‐Wide  Several locations were identified for corridor studies within the Highway 7 segment between Hollywood  Township and Minnetrista. It will be necessary to develop a prioritization of these corridor studies to determine  in what order they should occur. Alternatively, a singular study could be completed for the entire length of the  segment to determine the typical section, location of turn lanes, and locations of potential access control  measures.  6.2.2 Location ID 6: Highway 25 to CSAH 10  The medium‐term improvement strategy for this subsegment was to study the segment to determine the long‐ term desired typical section. Based on the discussion during the road safety audit, some of these options could  include a 2+1 section with a buffer, a 2+1 section without a buffer or barrier in median, a 4‐lane section, or a 3‐ lane section with left‐turn lanes.  6.2.3 Location ID 7: CSAH 10 to Buck Lake Road  The short‐term improvement strategy of reviewing the corridor study to determine turn lane locations should  give particular focus to the bypass lanes that currently exist along the subsegment. It should be determined  whether these bypass lanes remain, be removed, or be converted to formal left‐turn lanes.  The medium‐term improvement strategy that was discussed for this subsegment was to review and improve the  clear zone. The existing clear zone at several locations along this subsegment appears to be narrow with trees  within the clear zone. The corridor also has segments with non‐recoverable slopes in the clear zone. Figure 23  shows issues that exist at various locations along Highway 7, although the characteristics vary along the corridor.  The figure also shows a cross‐section that satisfies current design standards.   61   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 40    Figure 23: Undesirable Cross Section Compared to a Cross‐Section Satisfying Current Design Standards  6.2.4 Location ID 8: Highway 7 & Hunters Trail/Wildwood Avenue  This intersection was not flagged as a critical intersection based on the crash data but was brought up as an area  of concern based on public input during the road safety audit.   6.2.5 Location ID 9: CSAH 92/Main Street to CSAH 11/ Kings Point Road/Victoria Drive  The short‐term improvement that was identified for this subsegment of Highway 7 included completing a  corridor study. Particular consideration should be given to the future cross section of the roadway within the  City of St. Bonifacius. Figure 24 shows the existing cross section of Highway 7 near the CSAH 92/Main Street  intersection as well as a potential cross section for the same location. This potential cross section would provide  more urban characteristics such as a raised median, curb and gutter, and a trail along the north side of the  roadway.   62   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 41    Figure 24: Existing and Potential Typical Section of Highway 7 in St. Bonifacius  6.2.6 Location ID 10: Highway 7 & CSAH 92/Main Street  A medium‐term improvement identified during the road safety audit was adding signal improvements at this  intersection. While the intersection already has yellow retroreflective back‐plates on the signal heads, signal  enforcement confirmation lights could be added to the signal.   Signal enforcement confirmation lights help law enforcement identify vehicles that run red lights. Red light  running is a dangerous situation that can result in high severity crashes (e.g. angle crashes). The confirmation  light is located on the back of a traffic signal and is wired to the red‐light circuits at a traffic signal. When the red  light is on, the confirmation light also turns on, which allows law enforcement to monitor the intersection for  red light runners from a distance. These confirmation lights have been shown to reduce the frequency of red  light running at an intersection, but for them to be effective, they require an active partner in enforcement.   Examples of enforcement lights and yellow retroreflective back‐plates on signal heads and are shown in Figure  25 and Figure 26, respectively. In addition to this, accessible pedestrian signals and countdown timers could be  installed at the intersection.   63   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 42    Figure 25: Photo of Yellow Retroreflective Back‐Plates on Signal Heads    Figure 26: Photo of Signal Enforcement Confirmation Lights  6.3 Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka  A map that shows the locations for the improvements and suggestions that were discussed during the road  safety audit is shown in Figure 27 for the Highway 7 segment between Minnetrista and Minnetonka. The actual  improvements are detailed in Table 12 with the corresponding ID number to the Figure 27 map.  Specific  locations and improvements where additional discussion is needed are provided below. 64  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       43  Figure 27 Improvement Summary Map: Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka  65  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       44 Table 12 Improvement Strategies: Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka ID Subsegment/ Intersection Location Short‐Term Medium‐Term Long‐Term ‐ ‐ Segment‐wide Install advanced street name signs at intersections where not already; Identify signals that need battery back‐up; Complete corridor study: ‐ Centerline treatment  (rumble strip, separation, median) ‐ Access control (3/4 access & right‐in/right‐out) and strategic use of roundabouts for U‐turns ‐ Consistent application of turn lanes (or restrict access ‐ most have right and left‐turn lanes) ‐ Evaluate need for additional lighting  ‐ Long term typical‐section; Complete corridor‐wide review for pedestrian improvements/ connections (including areas surrounding Minnetonka  High School) Modify signals to include battery back‐up; Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility  (i.e., enforcement lights and yellow retroreflective back‐plates) Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study; Fund and construct pedestrian improvements/connections recommended 13 Intersection Merrywood Lane Sight‐triangle improvements (remove vegetation and may require grading) ‐ ‐ 14 Segment County Border (North of Lake Zumbra) to CSAH 13/ Smithtown Road  Complete corridor study (see description above); Complete corridor‐wide review for pedestrian improvements/ connections; Fix pavement marking and scaring in westbound accelerations lane area at Waterford Lane Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility (i.e., enforcement lights and  yellow retroreflective back‐plates); Improve geometry at Waterford Lane for westbound acceleration lane (e.g., improve geometry so westbound traffic isn’t guided into the right turn lane for Hawks Pointe Lane; create raised separation for acceleration lane or restrict access)  Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study; Fund and construct pedestrian improvements/connections recommended 15 Intersection Highway 7 & CSAH 13/Smithtown Road ‐ ‐ Fund and construct long‐term intersection improvement (Arboretum Area Transportation Plan has included several roundabout concepts) 66  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       45 ID Subsegment/ Intersection Location Short‐Term Medium‐Term Long‐Term 16 Intersection Highway 7 & Minnewashta Parkway/Church Road Review sight lines for side street traffic Improve pedestrian crossing on south leg; Construct pedestrian crossing at Highway 7 as part of the planned traffic signal Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study (potential roundabout or access control) 17 Segment County Border (west of Eureka Road) to  Highway 41/ Hazeltine Boulevard/ Lake Linden Drive Complete corridor study (see description above); Completed corridor‐wide review for pedestrian improvements/ connections Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility (i.e., enforcement lights and yellow retroreflective back‐plates) Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study; Fund and construct pedestrian improvements/connections recommended 18 Intersection Highway 7 & Eureka Road ‐ Construct enhanced pedestrian crossing at Highway 7 (e.g., rectangular rapid‐flashing beacon, pedestrian refuge island, etc.) Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study (potential roundabout or access control) 19 Intersection Highway 7 & Highway 41 Add additional pavement markings including stop bars; Study potential intersection improvements including alternative intersections since capacity constrained (e.g., slotted double lefts, RCUT, Michigan lefts) Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility (i.e., enforcement lights and yellow retroreflective back‐plates) Improve site plan and access to the north to improve safety and operations; Fund and construct intersection improvements 20 Segment Highway 41/Hazeltine Blvd/Lake Linden Drive to CSAH 19/Oak Street ‐ Install cable median barrier ‐ 21 Intersection Highway 7 & High Pointe Road/ Our Savior Lutheran Church Driveways ‐ Restrict left‐turns onto divided highway at these intersections (Toward Zero Deaths initiative) ‐ 22 Intersection Highway 7 & Water Street/Chaska Road ‐ Construct acceleration lane for southbound right‐turn; Realign southbound right‐turn to tighten radius without allowing drivers to illegally cross Highway 7 to get to Chaska Road (likely requires modifications to westbound left‐turn lane); Remove free flow southbound right immediately east at  Oak Street/Galpin Lake Road ‐ 67  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       46 ID Subsegment/ Intersection Location Short‐Term Medium‐Term Long‐Term 23 Intersection Highway 7 & Galpin Lake Road ‐ Potential access control/closure ‐ 24 Intersection Highway 7 & CSAH 19/Oak Street Install “no right‐turn on red”  blank‐out sign for the westbound right‐turn movement (to be active during school arrival/dismissal times) ‐ ‐ 25 Intersection Highway 7 & Morse Avenue Improved enforcement (revive POLO program with Minnetonka Police Department) Improve southbound  right‐turn geometry;  Add potential side street median ‐ 26 Intersection Highway 7 & Old Market Road Monitor since intersection improvements were just completed ‐ ‐ 27 Segment Vine Hill Road to CSAH 101 Complete corridor study (see description above); Complete corridor‐wide review for pedestrian improvements/ connections (including area surrounding Minnetonka  High School); Work with High School to improve parking management and  operations on campus Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility (i.e., enforcement lights and yellow retroreflective back‐plates); Install lighting Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study; Fund and construct pedestrian improvements/connections recommended 68   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 47  6.3.1 Location ID 13: Highway 7 & Merrywood Lane  This intersection was not identified as a critical intersection based on the crash data but was brought up as an  area of interest during the road safety audit.   6.3.2 Location IDs 14‐18  During the road safety audit, extra attention was given to the segments and intersections of Highway 7 from the  county border (north of Lake Zumbra) to Eureka Road. This area poses challenges since Highway 7 is the only  access in and out for many residential areas along this stretch of the corridor. Furthermore, a change in  intersection control was a common request during the public engagement process at multiple intersections in  this area. During the road safety audit, both access control and changes to intersection control were identified  as important improvements at several intersections.   Further discussion and study will be required to determine exact locations where change in access and  intersection control should be implemented. The addition of one to three roundabouts in this area would  provide safer entries to and from Highway 7. As discussed in Section 2.3.1, a goal of the Arboretum Area  Transportation Plan was to convert the intersection of Highway 7 & Rolling Acres Road to a roundabout. If a  second roundabout location was identified further east of this intersection, these roundabouts could serve as  “gateways” between the Highway 7 segments in this area and would improve safety by reducing crash severity  and slowing speeds in the influence area of the roundabout. Furthermore, adding a cable barrier or raised  median along Highway 7 would convert the lower volume public intersections and private accesses to right‐ in/right‐out and reduce the likelihood of crashes. The roundabouts would provide U‐turn locations for cross  streets where the access was modified to right‐in/right‐out and would serve as locations for pedestrian and  bicycle crossings. It will be important to keep pedestrian and bicycle network connectivity in mind in this area  when evaluating changes in access.    While the location and feasibility of this roundabout would need to be further evaluated, a high‐level concept  was developed assuming the intersection of Highway 7 & Minnewashta Parkway/Church Road was converted to  a roundabout. This concept is shown in Figure 28.   The intersection of Highway 7 and Eureka Road was shown as being converted to a three‐quarter access  intersection in this concept. Since this intersection does not meet warrants for traffic signal installation, a  change in access should be considered at the intersection to alleviate the identified safety issues. A marked  pedestrian crossing should also be considered for this intersection with a median pedestrian refuge (example  shown in Figure 29).   69   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 48    Figure 28 Access Control Concept on Highway 7 from Minnetrista to Minnetonka    Figure 29 Median Pedestrian Refuge Island Example (Source: FHWA)  70   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 49    As additional land development occurs west along the corridor, this divided two‐lane concept with periodic  roundabout intersection control could be extended further along Highway 7. This concept would ensure  moderate vehicle speeds, safer intersection operations, and provide crossing opportunities on Highway 7 for  both pedestrian and bicyclists.   6.3.3 Location ID 19: Highway 7 & Highway 41  The reduction from four lanes to two lanes approximately 700 feet west of this intersection creates challenges  with westbound vehicles speeding through the intersection to merge. Adding signal improvements to reduce red  light running and increase visibility may help alleviate some of these issues.  Particular focus should be given to pedestrian connectivity at this intersection when completing the segment‐ wide review for pedestrian improvements and connections due to the intersection’s proximity to a park, school,  retail area, and bicycle trails.   6.3.4 Location IDs 20, 21, & 24  These segments/intersections were not identified as critical locations based on the crash data but were  identified as areas for potential future improvements by MnDOT during the road safety audit recommendation  review process.  6.4 Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park  A map that shows the locations for the improvements and suggestions that were discussed during the road  safety audit is shown in Figure 30 for the Highway 7 segment between Minnetonka and St. Louis Park. The actual  improvements are detailed in Table 13 with the corresponding ID number to the Figure 30 map.  Specific  locations and improvements where additional discussion is needed are provided below. 71  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       50  Figure 30 Improvement Summary Map: Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park  72  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       51 Table 13 Improvement Strategies: Highway 7 from Minnetonka to St. Louis Park ID Segment/ Intersection Location Short‐Term Medium‐Term Long‐Term ‐ ‐ Segment‐wide Install advanced street name signs at intersections where not already; Identify signals that need battery back‐up; Complete corridor study from CSAH 101 to I‐494: ‐ Evaluate shoulder/median widths  ‐ Evaluate need for  additional lighting  ‐ Determine future classification of roadway (e.g., suburban, expressway, freeway); Complete corridor study from Highway 169 to Highway 100: ‐ Study to understand long‐term vision (e.g., interchanges, overpasses, converting to  non‐freeway segment) ‐ Keep Blake Road and Texas Avenue intersection improvements tied together; Complete corridor wide review for pedestrian improvements/ connections Modify signals to include battery back‐up; Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility (i.e., enforcement lights and  yellow retroreflective back‐plates) Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study; Fund and construct pedestrian improvements/connections recommended 28 Intersection Highway 7 & Williston Road Increase enforcement of red light running; Review operation of northbound free right‐turn and turn lane lengths on Highway 7  Add signal improvements to increase visibility (i.e., yellow retroreflective back‐plates) Consider adding medians on minor approaches; Add additional intersection capacity 29 Segment I‐494 to CSAH 61/Shady Oak Road ‐ Install cable median barrier ‐ 30 Intersection Highway 7 & Shady Oak Road Review pedestrian facilities in the area and identify additional multimodal connections  ‐ Fund and construct pedestrian improvements identified 31 Segment 5th Avenue/Oakridge Avenue to US 169 Complete corridor study (see description above) Modify applicable signals to include battery back‐up; Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility (i.e., enforcement lights and yellow retroreflective back‐plates) Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study; Fund and construct pedestrian improvements/connections recommended 73  Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report       52 ID Segment/ Intersection Location Short‐Term Medium‐Term Long‐Term 32 Intersection Highway 7 & US 169 Northbound Ramps Install tighter and wider pavement markings Add signal improvements to reduce red light running and increase visibility (i.e., enforcement lights and  yellow retroreflective back‐plates) ‐ 33 Intersection Highway 7 & CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue Apply high friction surface treatment at intersection approaches to improve vehicle control  ‐ Construct improvements recommended in corridor studies (e.g., quadrant roadway intersection, alternative intersection types, etc.). 34 Segment CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue to Louisiana Avenue    Install tighter and wider pavement markings; Study if an advanced intersection/ queue warning system has merit Add advanced intersection/ queuing warning system for westbound traffic if the study recommends that a system should be added Fund and construct improvements recommended in corridor study 35 Intersection Highway 7 & Texas Avenue Add stop bars and widen crosswalk markings; Apply high friction surface treatment at intersection approaches to improve vehicle control; Include additional signs, enhancing existing signing, or modifying signing to warn of signal for westbound traffic; Study if an advanced intersection/ queue warning system has merit Add advanced intersection/queuing warning system for westbound traffic if the study recommends that a system should be added Construct improvements recommended in corridor studies (e.g., quadrant roadway intersection, alternative intersection types, etc.). 36 Intersection Louisiana Roundabouts Review roundabouts to see if geometric changes can be made to improve safety, including potentially reducing the capacity of the roundabouts (i.e., would single lane roundabouts have adequate capacity?) Add high visibility markings and overhead signing; Add RRFBs on multi‐leg approaches; Implement geometric changes to slow down high‐speed eastbound exiting traffic and raised crosswalks for some approaches  ‐ 74   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 53  6.4.1 Location ID 29  This segment was not identified as a critical segment based on the crash data but was identified as an area for  potential future improvements by MnDOT during the road safety audit recommendation review process.  6.4.2 Location ID 30: Highway 7 & Shady Oak Road  The short‐term improvement recommendation from the road safety audit was to review pedestrian facilities in  the area and identify additional multimodal connections. These connections could include providing pedestrian  crossings on all legs of the intersection, providing pedestrian connections to transit stops at the intersection, and  constructing pedestrian facilities in areas where there is frequent pedestrian use (i.e., the desire line on  northwest corner of intersection). A summary of these improvements and how they may look at the intersection  is shown in Figure 31.    Figure 31 Multimodal Improvements at Highway 7 & Shady Oak Road  75   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 54  6.4.3 Location IDs 33‐35  A study was previously completed that focused on developing several intersection alternative concepts at  Highway 7 & CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue. These concepts included at‐grade and grade‐separated  options for the intersection and included the following alternatives:   Increased capacity on CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue and a pedestrian bridge on the west side of  the intersection   Increased capacity on CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue and a pedestrian bridge on the east side of  the intersection   Grade separation of Highway 7 and CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue with buttonhook ramps  provided approximately 500 feet west of the existing intersection (shown in Figure 32)   Grade separation of Highway 7 and CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue with offset single point  interchange provided on the south leg of the existing intersection   Grade separation of Highway 7 and CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue with a tight diamond  configuration    Figure 32 Highway 7 & CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue Grade Separation Concept with Buttonhook  Ramps  76   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 55  While these concepts looked specifically at the Highway 7 & CSAH 20/Blake Road/Aquila Avenue, future analysis  should consider how the nearby adjacent intersection of Texas Avenue could be included in the transportation  improvements. Based on the results of the crash analysis completed for this study and the discussion during the  road safety audit, it is recommended that additional steps be taken to advance these improvements as funding  allows.    6.4.4 Location ID 36: Louisiana Roundabouts  The interchange ramp intersections were not included within the original scope of the road safety audit because  the roundabouts are not located on Highway 7, but they were discussed during the road safety audit based on  input received from St. Louis Park.    7 Conclusions  An RSA was conducted by MnDOT in response to concerns about safety along the Highway 7 corridor between  Hollywood Township and St. Louis park. The purpose of the study was to review crash history, prior plans and  recommendations, and existing conditions to identify potential safety projects and safety strategies that can be  implemented as a part of future projects.   A review of five years of crash data (2016‐2020) was completed to understand crash trends experienced in the  study area for crashes of all severities. This review was also completed specifically for fatal and serious injury  crashes, and it also included data from January 2021 through September 2021. Considering the whole study  area, front to rear was the most common crash type with more than 50% of the crashes falling into this  category. The data also showed that more than 50% of the crashes in the study area were intersection related.  A crash analysis was completed to determine intersections and roadway subsegments where the total crash  trend is statistically higher than experienced on similar facilities in Minnesota. To complete this analysis, 71  intersections and 25 subsegments were reviewed as part of the RSA.  Several opportunities for public comment and feedback were given throughout the project. Between December  17, 2021 and January 20, 2022, questions and comments were able to be provided on an interactive map and  feedback was received from a survey. Over 1,000 responses were received between the survey and interactive  map. The feedback was considered by the road safety audit team as potential improvements were developed.   The RSA review team met on three separate occasions during February of 2022. All the meetings were held  virtually due to the COVID‐19 pandemic. As part of the field review, an overview of the corridor was provided  and then roadway segments and intersections of interest were reviewed and discussed. Other locations that  were not identified as critical locations, but where there has been considerable concern based on public input,  were also discussed. Crash trends were summarized at these each of these locations to understand if there were  certain patterns related to crash type, lighting, contributing factor, etc. Any issues identified by the RSA team  related to geometrics, the surrounding environment, infrastructure, or other areas were documented for each  segment and intersection in addition to any potential improvements.  Recommended short‐, medium‐, and long‐term potential improvement strategies were developed for segments  and intersections along the corridor. These strategies are based on an analysis of the crash data, review of  existing conditions, input from the RSA team, and comments received from the public. Short‐term strategies can  77   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 56  typically be implemented during a shorter timeframe (i.e., less than five years) because they are simpler to  implement, cost less, and often can be completed with maintenance forces. Medium‐term strategies will take  longer because their implementation requires additional study and design and they typically cost more. These  strategies often can be implemented on a five‐ten‐year horizon. Long‐term strategies are even more complex,  require significant funding, and usually take longer than 10 years to implement. It is important to note that just  even though a potential improvement strategy is listed, it may never be implemented.   The following are recommendations that should be considered moving forward to ensure safety projects  continue to be implemented in the study area:  1. MnDOT, Hennepin County, Carver County, and all of the cities and townships along the study corridor  should work collaboratively to review and develop a plan to implement short‐term potential  improvements.  2. An approach to complete the items that are listed as to be evaluated should be established as the  findings of those analyses will be used to confirm and/or determine some of the medium‐ or long‐term  improvements (e.g., completing corridor studies).  3. When improvement projects are programmed along these corridors, this document should be  referenced to make sure applicable safety improvements are incorporated into those projects.   4. Agencies should continue to work collaboratively to seek and apply for funding that can be used to  implement these safety improvements.   5. A review of traffic law enforcement practices and the development of changes needed to allow for  increased enforcement along Highway 7 is recommended.     78   Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Report 57  8 Appendix A – Comment Letters  79 St. Louis Park Engineering Department • 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416 www.stlouispark.org • Phone: 952.924.2656 • Fax: 952.924.2662 • TTY: 952.924.2518 Memorandum To: Derek Leuer, State Traffic Safety Engineer Andrew Lutaya, West Metro Area Engineer From: Joseph Shamla, Engineering Project Manager Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Date: January 24, 2022 Subject: Highway 7 Road Safety Audit Introduction Highway 7 is an important corridor through St. Louis Park and we are interested in the findings of the safety audit. Staff met with the St. Louis Park traffic committee so we could provide feedback to MnDOT on our observations in the corridor. The information below is a summary of what was discussed. In 2019, the city hired a consultant to complete a city-wide crash analysis. The crash data that was reviewed was from 2017-2019. This information was used to provide feedback. A copy of the study is attached for your reference. Intersection of Highway 7 and Texas Ave MnDOT completed improvements to Highway 7 at Texas Avenue during the years which were reviewed. Our consultant completed a before and after improvement review at these intersections during the 2019 study. Unfortunately, the crash rate has not improved at the intersection of Highway 7 and Texas Avenue. Overall, there is a significant amount of rear end and sideswipe crashes for westbound traffic at the intersection- 49% of the total crashes. In our opinion, westbound traffic on HIghway 7 effectively operates as a freeway with Texas Avenue being the first intersection in nearly two miles. In addition, there is a vertical curve just east of the intersection. When traffic is backed up at the signal during peak periods, a westbound queue of vehicles creates an unexpected condition, potentially resultin g in a rear end collision or a sideswipe as vehicles try to abruptly stop and or change lanes to avoid a collision. The city requests that MnDOT look at this intersection to see if there are additional modifications that could be made to address the crash rate. We offer that the westbound Highway 7 review includes a sight distance analyses to determine if the road grade needs to be modified or if Intelligent transportation system (ITS) solutions would lower the crash rate. 80 Page 2 The intersection of Texas Avenue is adjacent to the regional mall “The Shoppes at Knollwood”. Safely accessing the mall whether it be as a pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle is important. In 2019, the City of St. Louis Park added a pedestrian and bicycle connection across Highway 7 at Texas Avenue. The intersection should be reviewed for safety of all users of the corridor. Intersection of Highway 7 and Aquila Ave The Highway 7 at Aquila Avenue intersection had a high crash rate prior to MnDOT making improvements in 2017-2018. The post construction review for Highway 7 and Aquila Avenue is favorable. A before and after crash rate indicates that there was a reduction in overall crash rates. The city would like to understand if this trend has continued. Due to it’s proximity to “The Shoppes at Knollwood”, this intersection is an important bicycle and pedestrian route. The City of Hopkins recently reconstructed Blake Road adding bicycle and pedestrian facilities south of this intersection. Please review the pedestrian and bicycle crossings to ensure that the users who want to cross at this intersection can do so safely. Highway 7 and Louisiana Ave (southern roundabout ) The 2019 analysis revealed a high number of accidents on the eastbound Highway 7 ramp connection to the southern roundabout. One of the concerns expressed by our residents is the speed in which vehicles are exiting Highway 7 and entering the roundabout. Please review to see if there are modifications that enhance safety for all users. Highway 7 and Louisiana Ave (bicycle and pedestrian crossing of MnDOT ramps) The city has received feedback from the community regarding the trail crossings of the MnDOT ramps to Louisiana Avenue. Please review the crossings to understand what modifications or enhancements could be made to raise awareness and promote safety for bicycle and pedestrians using the trail. One issue to be reviewed is the sight distance of a trail user heading north on the trail adjacent to Louisiana Avenue. The soil along the sides of the bridge impede the view of a bicyclist. Thank you for completing the safety audit of Highway 7. We look forward to learning more about the findings of this study. Attached: Blake Road / Aquila Avenue Study 2019 Citywide Crash Study 81 339 THIRD STREET, EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 | P: 952.474.6633 | F: 952.548.1690 | greenwoodmn.com March 5, 2022 Minnesota Department of Transportation Christine Krueger SENT VIA EMAIL Communications and Engagement Director christine.krueger@state.mn.us Re: Hwy 7 Safety Audit Dear Christine, The City of Greenwood appreciates MnDOT embarking on a Hwy 7 Safety Audit. As you know, Hwy 7 passes through our city. We have the following observations, suggestions, and thoughts for consideration: 1. Christmas Lake Road Intersection. a. Traffic approaching the intersection is generally at high speeds. i. Consider traffic calming techniques or warning lights. ii. Consider reverting back to the 50mph speed limit from Old Market Road to Rolling Acres Rd. b. Traffic stopped at the intersection generates “Black Ice” during winter conditions making the blind approach to the intersection very dangerous. i. Cars have skidded off Hwy 7 and landed on Excelsior Boulevard during past occurrences. c. Approaching traffic generally does not consider pedestrians crossing the intersection. i. Consider moving the pedestrian crossing to the west side of intersection. ii. Consider posting "No Right Turn on Red" sign to prevent turning from Christmas Lake Road onto westbound Hwy 7. This change also prevents conflict with eastbound Hwy 7 u-turners. iii. Consider pedestrian activated crossing time. iv. Consider adding visual pedestrian reminders like crosswalk paint, signage, flashing lights, etc. 2. Eureka Road Intersection. While outside of the City of Greenwood, we offer the following comments: a. Left and right uncontrolled turns across traffic generate a dangerous condition. i. Consider timing and coordinating traffic control lights to provide gaps in the traffic flow that allow safe entry to Hwy 7. ii. Consider traffic calming to slow traffic to accommodate uncontrolled access. b. Left turn sightlines from Eureka can be blocked by vehicles in the Hwy 7 right turn lane and create a dangerous condition. i. Consider controlling the intersection with a roundabout to keep Hwy 7 traffic flowing and provide traffic calming to allow safer access from Eureka onto Hwy 7. Thanks for your consideration of these comments. If you have any questions or would like to discuss the audit, Councilman Bill Cook (612.805.0424 billandtishcook@msn.com) and Councilman Rob Roy 9218.749.(612 lrobroy@msn.com) have been appointed to follow this audit. Please inform them of any public activities associated with this project. Sincerely, Debra J. Kind Mayor, City of Greenwood on behalf of the Greenwood City Council 82 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Discussion of 2023 Preliminary Budget, Levy and CIP (ITEM POSTPONED TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2022) File No.Item No: A.3 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Discussion only. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 83 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Future Work Session Schedule File No.Item No: A.4 Agenda Section 5:30 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: September 26, 2022 1. Fire Department Open House, 6-7 p.m. October 10, 2022 1. Lake Ann Park Preserve Master Plan: Open House Follow-up and Project Update October 24, 2022 1. General Fund & Property Supported Funds Discussion November 14, 2022 84 1. CIP, Debt & Utility Rate Study Discussion BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 pm on the second and fourth Monday of each month in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 85 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Teen Volunteer Recognition File No.Item No: C.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Coordinator Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY On behalf of the City Council and the Park & Recreation Commission, I would like to recognize the 2022 Teen Volunteers. These 13-16 year-olds were selected to serve as volunteers for City-sponsored recreation programs from June through August. Programs included the Summer Concert Series, Summer Discovery Playground Program, Lake Ann Adventure Camp, Senior Center activities, and Rec Center Sports programs. The City would like to thank this year's teen volunteers for their service. Together they compiled over 945 hours of service to the City of Chanhassen, the most any group of volunteers through the years has! 2022 Teen Volunteers 1. Erin Anderson 2. Anna Blong 3. Clara Christenson 4. Arunabh Dogra 86 5. Daschle Duwe 6. Tucker Fritsch 7. Sara Koester 8. Mahi Madhan Kumar 9. Jacob Landon 10. Briella Lesinski 11. Isabella Lund 12. Henry Lund 13. Jack Maves 14. Svea Moberg 15. Blake Patka 16. Nischay Pattanashetty 17. Noah Vukelich 18. Owen Wilkinson 19. Zoey Zvanovec BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 87 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Approve City Council Minutes dated August 22, 2022 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council minutes dated August 22, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS City Council Work Session Minutes dated August 22, 2022 88 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes dated August 22, 2022 89 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES AUGUST 22, 2022 COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman McDonald, and Councilwoman Rehm. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:Councilman Campion and Councilwoman Schubert. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Charlie Howley, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Rick Rice, MIS Manager; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT:None. Mayor Ryan called the Work Session to order at 5:30 p.m. 2023 PRELIMINARY BUDGET, LEVY, AND CIP DISCUSSION City Manager Laurie Hokkanen formally introduced Finance Director Kelly Grinnell. Ms. Grinnell provided an overview of tonight’s budget presentation agenda: Review and discuss proposed preliminary General Fund Budget Review and discuss the Preliminary CIP for 2023-2027 for tax-supported funds Review County assessment report and historical data (Market Values) Review and discuss the proposed Preliminary Levy and impact on taxes Review upcoming meeting dates and deadlines Council input and questions Preliminary General Fund Budget: A balanced budget is projected for 2023 in the amount of $14,343,275, which results in a year-end fund balance of $7,739,515. A Revenue Stabilization Arrangement is proposed to amend the fund balance policy to commit an equivalent of one year of permit revenue. Ms. Grinnell referenced that the proposed budget relates to the City’s Strategic Plan priorities of Financial Sustainability and Operational Excellence. Ms. Grinnell presented a pie chart showing the General Fund revenue sources, which included property taxes, cable franchise fees (previously accounted for in the CATV Fund), license and permit fees, fines and penalties, intergovernmental, charges for services, other revenue, and transfers in (new this year). A table was then presented showing the General Fund revenue comparison in each of these sources between 2022 and 2023. Highlights of the revenue changes include the following: Cable Franchise Fees were previously recorded in the CATV Fund along with Communications expenses – reallocated revenue is $154,000 90 City Council Work Session Minutes – August 22, 2022 2 Transfer in from CATV Fund - $45,000 to offset increased expense in General Fund due to moving of Communications expenses from CATV Fund Building Permit Revenues – recommend using three-year average of 2018, 2019, and 2020 revenues to budget for 2023 (2021 was an unusually high year) Interest Earnings – interest rates have increased so budgeting an additional $80,000 in 2023 Ms. Grinnell then presented a pie chart showing General Fund expenditures by function (Public Safety, General Government, Public Works, Park and Recreation, and Community Development) which results in a 6.6% increase. A table was then presented showing the General Fund expenditure comparison for each function between 2022 and 2023. Ms. Grinnell reviewed the changes in each of the expenditure functions: General Government: Key changes include approximately $200,000 increase in the Communications Department largely due to the inclusion of wages and benefits for the Communications Manager and other expenditures that were previously accounted for in the CATV Fund. About $114,000 (3.8%) of the increase is due to wage/benefit changes and inflationary increases. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification for the changes in the CATV Fund. Ms. Hokkanen replied that historically some Communications expenses have been paid out of the General Fund. The CATV Fund is a special revenue fund which previously funded the City Recorder position and initially the Communications Manager position, resulting in two different accounts that were both dedicated to Communications. Now we are proposing to merge both accounts. There is no spending increase or change in our Communication operations, we are just combining the two accounts by transferring the CATV revenues. Mayor Ryan stated that it is budget neutral but that the increase results from salary and benefits. Ms. Hokkanen confirmed that statement. Public Safety: Key changes include the police contract increasing by 10%, with an additional 10% increase expected in 2024. Fire Department wages and benefits will increase due to hiring three new captains (cost will be offset by reduced on-call hours). ARPA funding is planned to be used in 2023 towards these staffing additions. Overall wages and benefits for the department are increasing $434,000 from 2022. Closing Fire Station 2 will result in further cost reductions and eliminates the need for a new engine estimated to cost between $800K and $1M. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification on the police contract staffing. Lt. Lance Pearce responded that about a year ago deputies received a significant pay increase to increase employee retention. The increase in salary and benefits impact from this two-year contract will be seen in 23 and 24. Mayor Ryan asked if the City was now fully staffed. Lt. Pearce responded that the staff position rates are the average rates charged to the City. Ms. Hokkanen added that the City pays by position rates, not by actual person. In 2021 the City received a $200K refund from the County for positions that weren’t able to be filled through the contract. Public Works: A decrease in expenditures of $104,625 is anticipated in 2023. The expenses for facilities and fleet maintenance area being moved from Internal Service Funds to the General Fund in 2023, which overall results in little change to the budget. An additional $194,000 was allocated to the Surface Water Management Fund for wages. 91 City Council Work Session Minutes – August 22, 2022 3 The budget also includes $90,000 for replacement of streetlights and lighting cabinets. Mayor Ryan asked about the responsibilities of the electric companies for these replacement costs. Mr. Howley responded that there are two different power companies that serve the City, Xcel and Minnesota Valley Electric Company and they both offer different programs. Xcel has a lot of different contracts as to who pays for what and it is not consistent within the City. Generally, the City pays for the power for streetlights within neighborhoods and the electric utility owns those streetlights. The exception is the streetlights and cabinets located on larger collector roadways such as Kerber and Coulter Boulevards that are not a part of a neighborhood. They are owned and operated by the City. Community Development: The increase of $25,706 is due to wage/benefit changes and inflationary increases. Parks and Recreation: Key changes include increases in park maintenance expenses due to wage and benefit increases for both permanent and seasonal employees, recreation program expenses due to increased event costs such as fireworks and tents, tables, portable restrooms and other equipment rental, and dance and other program fees are higher, but they will be offset by increased revenues. Mayor Ryan asked if the City was considering charging more for rental space and programming. Mr. Ruegemer responded that fees are reviewed annually and were substantially increased a year or two ago. Staff is always looking for new ways to increase revenue generation. General Fund Balance & Revenue Stabilization: Ms. Grinnell explained that fund balance is the difference between assets and liabilities of which there are five categories: Non-Spendable: not in spendable form (such as inventory or prepaid items) and legally or contractually required to be maintained intact. Restricted: Amounts that can be spent only for the specific purposes stipulated by constitution, external resource providers, or through enabling legislation (such as bond covenants). Unrestricted o Committed: Amounts that can be used for specific purpose stipulated by resolution of the City Council. o Assigned: Resources are intended for spending for a purpose set by the governing body itself or by some person or body delegated to exercise such authority in accordance with the policy established by the City Council. o Unassigned: Residual classification for the general fund and represents fund balance that has not been restricted, committed or assigned to specific purposes of the general fund. Chanhassen’s current policy is that the General Fund should maintain a minimum unassigned fund balance at year end equal to 50% of following year’s levied property taxes and anticipated state aid. Staff is proposing to add onto the existing 50% requirement for unassigned but create a revenue stabilization arrangement to formally set aside amounts for use in case of a revenue shortfall e.g. building permit revenue. This amount would be set aside as committed fund 92 City Council Work Session Minutes – August 22, 2022 4 balance in the General Fund in an amount up to the succeeding year’s budgeted building permit revenue. Ms. Grinnell presented a table showing the calculation of the proposed amount. Preliminary CIP 2023-2027: Ms. Grinnell reviewed the Capital Facilities Fund, Transportation Infrastructure Management Fund, Pavement Management Fund, and Capital Equipment/Vehicle Replacement Fund. The CIP links to the financial sustainability and asset management priorities of the City’s Strategic Plan. Capital Facilities Fund: Mayor Ryan asked about the security fencing and access control expense and if most Public Works facilities are secured and is this the direction we are going. Mr. Howley responded that more than half are secured and many of these facilities end up being an emergency operations center (EOC). As the Emergency Management Director for the City, Chief Johnson added that there have been specific discussions to locate the City’s EOC at Public Works. The primary source of revenue for this fund is property taxes; however, there currently is not enough income to meet the identified needs. Transportation Infrastructure Management (TIM) Fund: Funds the ADA transition plan improvements, and trails and parking lots pavement management. The dedicated funding source is also property taxes. There is a positive fund balance at the end of the five-year CIP; however, it has decreased from where it started. Pavement Management Program (PMP) Fund: Funds a number of identified street improvements. There are multiple revenue sources for this fund including property taxes, intergovernmental-Non MSA, MSA construction, MSA maintenance, franchise fees, special assessments, and investment earnings. Capital Equipment Replacement Fund: Funds fleet capital equipment/vehicles, fleet leased vehicles, and technology. Fleet capital equipment/vehicles for 2023 total $653,900. Technology includes BS&A cloud-hosted service migration, computer/network equipment purchase/upgrades, and finance software replacement. Mayor Ryan asked how the City’s building department compares to other cities in terms of technology and ease of use. Ms. Aanenson replied that processing permits for residents and contractors has significantly improved over the past year with the online application and payment process. Reports can also be generated quickly. Ms. Hokkanen added that the next frontier for permit processing would be to integrate plan review and permit processing. Revenues for this fund are from property taxes and investment earnings. Unfunded Items: The Park Renovation fund does not have a dedicated, ongoing funding source and there are several park renovation projects that lack funding. The Park Acquisition and Development fund does have a dedicated, ongoing funding source in park dedication fees. The Lake Ann Park Preserve project is not included in this list as the Council has preliminarily reserved $1.3M of ARPA funds to start the project. 93 City Council Work Session Minutes – August 22, 2022 5 Market Values: Ms. Grinnell presented a chart from the County Assessor’s Report for taxes payable in 2023 showing the assessment summary, residential, commercial/industrial, apartment, and agricultural. Proposed Preliminary Levy, Tax Rate, and Taxes: Ms. Grinnell shared a slide showing the total proposed preliminary (maximum) levy payable in 2023 is $13,325,000 which is an increase of $661,924 (5.2%) over the 2022 levy. The projected tax rate for taxes payable in 2023 is 19.9% compared to 22.4% in 2022. If an additional $250,000 is levied, the tax rate would be 20.3%. Ms. Grinnell next presented bar charts showing the levy history from 2017 to proposed 2023, as well as levy projections from 2023 to 2029. Tables were then presented showing the differences between 5.2% and 7.2% levy projections. A bar chart showing preliminary levy increases with 12 comparable cities was then presented showing Chanhassen as the third lowest increase. If a 7.2% levy was approved, Chanhassen would fall somewhere in the middle. Next Ms. Grinnell presented a slide showing the tax levy impact on various homes in Chanhassen valued at $300K, $500K, $700K and $900K. Revenue and expenditure comparisons of state-wide averages were also presented. Next Steps: Ms. Grinnell provided the following schedule: September 12 City Council Work Session and Meeting: discuss maximum tax levy in work session and set the preliminary (maximum) levy at the regular meeting November 14 (and November 28 if needed) City Council Work Session: Review CIP, Debt, and Utility Funds and Budgets for all Funds October 24 City Council Work Session: discuss General Fund and Property Tax supported funds December City Council Meeting: Hold truth-in-taxation public hearing and adopt levy, budget, and fee schedule Mayor Ryan thanked Ms. Grinnell for the presentation. Since Councilmembers Schubert and Campion are absent, Ms. Hokkanen and Ms. Grinnell will review this presentation with each of them prior to the next meeting. Councilwoman Rehm also complimented the presentation and liked the idea of smoothing out the levy increases. Mayor Ryan asked for more information regarding the revenue stabilization arrangement. Ms. Hokkanen responded that Councilman Campion had asked if the City was budgeting too conservatively in terms of building permits given the number of years of growth and revenue we have experienced. Historically we have purposefully been very conservative in terms of building permits because we acutely remember 2008, we know that the market can change, and we haven’t wanted to be overly reliant on building permits. What Ms. Grinnell is suggesting is a good compromise between budgeting more realistically using a three-year average and not being in a position where we would need to lay off staff or make dramatic cuts because we will have dedicated revenue set aside for that purpose. Ms. Grinnell added that this would stay in the General Fund but be classified differently from unassigned fund balance. The rating agencies look favorably on this. Councilman McDonald asked if its only purpose be for permits or could we use it for other things that we project revenue for. Ms. Grinnell responded that we could do it for other things but building permits are probably the largest revenue source besides property taxes and nothing else has as much volatility. It could be compared to a rainy-day fund. We are proposing to set it up to be 94 City Council Work Session Minutes – August 22, 2022 6 equal to the following year’s building permit revenue. Councilman McDonald asked if we had a surplus in the fund what would we do with it. Ms. Grinnell replied that the funds would remain in the General Fund as unassigned fund balance, and they could be used for one-time uses or continue to build up fund balance. The goal is that over time the fund stays stable and doesn’t decrease. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification of the assigned fund balance. Ms. Grinnell responded that she didn’t see anything that had been formally assigned in the past. It is something we could choose to do in the future. Mayor Ryan expressed her appreciation to Ms. Grinnell for the budget presentation. FUTURE WORK SESSION SCHEDULE Date Item September 12 Preliminary Levy Discussion Valley Auto Salvage Request for Expansion of Non-conforming Use for Recycling September 26 Fire Department Open House, 6-7 p.m. October 24 General Fund & Property Supported Funds Discussion November 14 CIP, Debt & Utility Rate Study Discussion The work session adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 95 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 22, 2022 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilman McDonald. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:Councilman Campion, Councilwoman Schubert. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Charlie Howley, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; Jodi Sarles, Rec Center Manager; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Lt. Lance Pearce, CCSO; Sgt. Amanda Grundeman, CCSO; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: Andrew Soudbash 1740 Ringneck Drive Steve Soudbash 1740 Ringneck Drive PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Rehm seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated July 11, 2022 2. Receive Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated July 19, 2022 3. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated July 12, 2022 4. Approve Claims Paid dated August 22, 2022 5. Adopt Updated Non-DOT Drug Testing and Drug Free Workplace Policy for City Employees to Incorporate the New THC Law 6. Approve Temporary Modification of the Licensed Premises to serve Beer in the Chanhassen Brewing Company Parking Lot Area 7. Terminate Contract between the City of Chanhassen and Hufcor, Inc. for the Chanhassen Recreation Center Community Room Wall Project 8. Approve Revised Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Chanhassen and Independent School District 112 for the Chanhassen Recreation Center and Bluff Creek Elementary School 9. Approve Contract for Annual Sanitary and Storm Sewer Televising 96 City Council Minutes – August 22, 2022 2 10. Approve Agreement with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for a Sewer Flow Meter 11.Resolution 2022-65:Approve Construction Materials Testing Agreement for Construction of the 2022 City Pavement Rehabilitation and 2022 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Projects 12.Resolution 2022-66:Remove No Parking on Picha Drive 13.Resolution 2022-67: Authorize Design and Construction Administration Services Contract for 2022 Stormwater Pond Improvement Project All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 3 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATE 1. Fire Department Update Fire Chief Don Johnson gave an update noting they had 106 calls in June and 101 calls in July for service. Significant calls included a cooking fire, two mutual-aid house fires and they responded to the Hopkins house explosion, a house fire in Chaska, a grass fire, garbage can fire, and two car fires. They also responded to a garage fire on Hidden Lane which was spontaneous combustion of rags from people who were staining. Through July they have had a total of 629 calls which is about 8.8% above the previous year at this time. No starts (medicals which do not reach the level to start the Fire Department) are at 137 and the previous year they were at 132. Duty Crew calls currently total 392 which puts the department on track for about 672 distinct Duty Crew calls but adding the day-only and the Chief calls from earlier in the year they will be close to 800 staffed calls. Over those two months the department had 143 EMS responses with 70 of those being patient assessments and interventions; Chief Johnson noted they are arriving a bit ahead of Ridgeview about 50% of the time. He spoke about the 4th of July, Minnetonka’s annual Mud Run, the annual Relief meeting, and shared the department provided coverage for Victoria so they could attend training. Mayor Ryan shared her appreciation for some challenging calls and responses including the Hopkins explosion and the pedestrian death at Highway 5 and Market Boulevard. She heard a comment from a passersby about the quick action and response and the way it was handled and managed. She is appreciative and knows that weighs heavy upon the team and thanked them for what they do day in and day out. 2. Law Enforcement Update Police Lieutenant Lance Pearce noted Sergeant Grundeman will give the presentation for June and July. Sergeant Grundeman noted they had 890 calls for service in June and 899 calls for service in July and a large majority of calls were non-criminal and traffic-related. There was an uptick in theft or fraud between June and July and also now into August. In June the department had 273 traffic stops with 83 citations and in July there were 329 traffic stops and 84 citations. She noted 97 City Council Minutes – August 22, 2022 3 they are dealing with an increase in catalytic converter thefts in Chanhassen and Carver County which is happening metro-wide. There are many investigative things being done regarding these thefts including creating maps of where the thefts are occurring, times, dates, and patterns which has provided some suspects. They are actively working with their investigative unit. Sergeant Grundeman noted they had one fatal accident in June and July which is statistically significant being they have not had a fatal accident since 2015. To curb this the department is utilizing the Towards Zero Deaths (TZD) grant for extra enforcement and the Sherriff’s office also received two new traffic squads being utilized and marked with “ghost graphics” which are not as easy to see. There has been a significant amount of traffic enforcement and presence within the community. There will also be additional traffic enforcement within the County from today through September 19, 2022. She shared about staffing updates noting they are officially fully staffed in Chanhassen and spoke about rifle qualification training, several events and community engagements including the 4th of July, Chaska area Fishing with Friends, and the Night to Unite. Councilman McDonald asked if criminals are targeting a certain type of cars with catalytic converter thefts and if there is something residents can do to protect themselves. Sergeant Grundeman replied vehicles that are higher off the ground are being targeted as they are easier to get under; they are seeing this on SUVs, buses, and box trucks. She spoke about deterrence noting people should park in well-lit areas, park indoors if possible, and there are things one can put on their vehicle to make it harder for theft. Councilman McDonald stated he has ridden two years in a row with Sergeant Grundeman for Night to Unite and it has always been a pleasure and in this community the police are well- respected and kids look forward to them pulling up at the Night to Unite events. Mayor Ryan asked what other communities are doing with regards to enforcement or policy- perspective. Ms. Hokkanen noted there are some communities that have passed an ordinance that it is illegal to possess a catalytic converter unless one can prove ownership. Communities have also hosted events to do some etching on the catalytic converters which deters because they are harder for resale. The City could look at either of those or anything else the department is aware of. Sergeant Grundeman noted things are being looked at, even at a legislative level, because it is nationwide and she thinks eventually things will come down the line with regards to this kind of theft. Mayor Ryan reiterated her comments to the Fire Chief and noted there has been a death as well as other scenarios in Chanhassen and she appreciates the professionalism that the team possesses and how they approach every situation. 98 City Council Minutes – August 22, 2022 4 PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Approve On-Sale Beer & Wine Liquor License for Manaslu Group, LLC doing business as Thaliwala located at 7850 Market Boulevard Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager, gave a presentation noting this is in regard to a new restaurant that will occupy approximately 2,796 square feet which will serve Indian food in a fast, casual concept. It will seat 55 inside and 12 on the outdoor patio and anticipates opening on September 19, 2022. Law enforcement conducted a background investigation on the two partners and Lieutenant Pearce reviewed those and noted there was nothing questionable related to State Statute. A public hearing notice was published in The Chanhassen Villager on August 11, 2022 and was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. Staff has not received any comments from the public. Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Rehm seconded that the City Council approve the application for an on-sale beer and wine liquor license from Manaslu Group, LLC doing business as Thaliwala, located at 7850 Market Boulevard. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 3 to 0. GENERAL BUSINESS.None. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. 1. Letters from League of Minnesota Cities regarding Senator Julia Coleman Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Rehm seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 3 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:27 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 99 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated August 16, 2022 File No.Item No: D.2 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated August 16, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Planning Commission Minutes dated August 16, 2022 100 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 16, 2022 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman von Oven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Noyes, Mark von Oven, Erik Johnson, Perry Schwartz, Edward Goff, Kelsey Alto. MEMBERS ABSENT: Ryan Soller. STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; MacKenzie Young- Walters, Associate Planner; Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer. PUBLIC PRESENT: Mark Nordland Level 7 development PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. RSI MARINE, 10500 AND 10520 GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR REZONING TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITH SITE PLAN, VACATION, CONSOLIDATION OF LOTS, AND VARIANCES Associate Planner Young-Walters gave a presentation on the item, noting in March the Planning Commission saw a concept PUD for this development and the applicant is now back for formal rezoning and site plan approval. This will go before the City Council on September 12, 2022. The area is zoned fringe business district and the applicant is requesting to be rezoned to planned unit development (PUD), guided in the 2040 land use plan as mixed, and is proposed to be used as warehousing in the short-term and mixed-use commercial development in the long-term. Mr. Young-Walters spoke about zoning in the area and said staff believes rezoning to PUD will allow a reasonable use of the warehousing until sewer and potable water is available to the site. Staff also believes it will serve as a good transition between Highway 101 and 61and the planned high density residential to the east. The applicant is proposing two 22,600 square foot buildings and two 20,000 square foot boat storage buildings. They are providing a fire turn around and retaining walls along the north and east side. Mr. Young-Walters spoke about colors and architectural details noting they will get further material boards before bringing it to the City Council. The applicant asked for a variance to the vehicular area landscaping standards as typically the City Code would require five islands or peninsulas and 3,000 square feet of landscaping. However, due to the nature of the business involving pulling boat trailers into the buildings there is no way to make it work while allowing efficient vehicle movements within that area. Mr. Young-Walters noted a condition that when this is redeveloped and parking spaces are added, the area would need to meet the landscaping standards at that time. Staff is recommending approval of the variance. 101 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 2 Project Engineer Henricksen spoke about public utilities noting sanitary and potable water services are not yet available to the site and due to the nature of use, the applicant is only proposing to connect to the water system. They will need to extend the water main to the eastern property line through the right-of-way on site for fire suppression. The property will be specially assessed for the cost to connect to sanitary sewer once it is available. Mr. Henricksen spoke about access to the site noting the surrounding right-of-way is under Carver County jurisdiction and preliminary comments are concerns about the left turn movement into the site while headed eastbound because of a median at that location. There are no wetlands delineated on the site but one wetland is located south of the project and plans will need to show vegetation and wetland buffer markers. He spoke about a steep slope on the property which is not considered a bluff and noted the Watershed District regulates steep slopes within their borders and the applicant will need to confirm if regulations apply. Mr. Henricksen spoke about grading and stormwater. Mr. Young-Walters showed a compliance table noting the applicant meets or exceeds all requirements with the exception of parking standards. City Code gives staff flexibility on parking when the business model does not require the parking that Code requires. Given the operation, staff is comfortable with the five parking stalls. Commissioner Schwartz asked what happens when a bunch of people show up for their boats and park their cars. Mr. Young-Walters replied a customer never brings a boat to this site. Rather, RSI staff brings the boat to the site and winterizes it. Commissioner Schwartz noted most of the business parks in Chanhassen are pleasantly hidden from street view by landscaping and asked about having more tree barriers between the structures and the street. Mr. Young-Walters showed the landscape plans and noted the business parks are subject to the same buffer yard and landscape standards as this development. Staff has a condition that the applicant must add numerous overstory and understory trees and shrubs to align with those standards. Commissioner Noyes asked if the City is limiting themselves when the applicant wants to hook up sewer and water for businesses or offices. Mr. Young-Walters replied by giving the applicant the entitlement they have the right to continue this operation as long as they find it desirable. They will be required to hook up to the sewer and water and extend it so it will not become a choke to further developments. The applicant has indicated eventual interest in redeveloping. Chair von Oven asked about a fence. Mr. Young-Walters noted if the applicant chooses to add a future fence it will need to be located behind the landscape buffer, would be subject to the 8 foot height minimum, and would need a building permit. 102 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 3 Rob Schatzle, owner of RSI Marine, noted customers will not be allowed at the site and this site is basically just for storage. He is open to redevelopment in the future noting this is a short-term solution for watercraft storage for his business. Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. Mike Spiess, 470 Flying Cloud Drive, noted any mixed-use concerns him and he asked if the Commissioners have thought about the traffic implications. He noted the roundabout gets backed up now and with the location of the driveway and mixed-use, it is already difficult to get out onto the road. In putting more houses and people down there, he asked about the implications of more traffic trying to get onto Flying Cloud or Highway 61 because it is a concern for Mr. Spiess even right now. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Schwartz asked about the future with mixed-use and who is responsible for the traffic surveys that may dictate modification to the road or an increase in lanes. Mr. Henricksen replied looking at the site as presented they must provide reasonable access to someone’s property. On this location the County installed the driveway access to the furthest southeast corner of the property. There was no viable way to introduce access off Trunk Highway 101. He noted this is a County road and it is their purview to comment and have requirements when there is development on their right-of-ways so they can request certain traffic studies. Mr. Young-Walters stated any change to the buildings that would modify them more than 10% would trigger a site plan review before the Planning Commission and at that point traffic studies would be conducted and the County would have another look to determine concerns on access. Commissioner Noyes moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Planned Unit Development rezoning, site plan, vacation, consolidation of lots, and variance, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. 2. AVIENDA: CONSIDER A REQUEST TO AMEND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RC Community Development Director Kate Aanenson gave a report on the item noting this is the amended PUD and is a revision to a PUD approved in 2020. The developer is requesting changes after meeting with neighbors including 1. Adding 53 row homes between the townhomes and the apartments 2. Increasing the number of apartments from 250 to 417 3. Combine the 150-unit senior housing development to one 300-unit building at the southwest corner 103 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 4 4. The northerly senior housing is now a retail use in the plan 5. Shows potential locations for three to four additional drive-throughs, but does not seek approval at this time 6. The district plan may be fluid as future users are identified Ms. Aanenson stated the developer has agreed to work within the 768 units and if the senior housing is built on the southern location that could be up to five stories built into the hill. She spoke about history of the project going back to 2016 and showed the 2020 site plan on screen and contrasted it with the proposed revisions. Mr. Henricksen spoke about high-level traffic implications noting a traffic study was done in 2005 and updated in 2017. With the updated land use the developer’s engineer provided an updated trip generation analysis between the proposed and he stated overall they see a reduction in volume from the proposed uses. Ms. Aanenson contrasted the district master plan from the 2020 approved and the 2022 proposed plans on screen. She spoke about the projected housing demand within Chanhassen through 2040 at 6,560 housing demands which could be ownership (single-family or multi-family), senior (adult owned, adult rental, or service enriched), rental (affordable and market rate). She summarized proposed changes on screen speaking about the adjustments to housing, the addition of a car wash, and 25,000 square feet of entertainment for regional draw. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in making a PUD amendment as they are acting in their legislative authority and Ms. Aanenson noted they can add to or subtract some of the changes. She clarified site plan approval is required for all buildings, a public hearing is required with notice, and the site plan must comply with standards in the PUD-RC ordinance including height, setback, architecture, signage, parking, traffic, utilities, etcetera. If the use/plan meets all standards and is consistent with the PUD ordinance, the City has little discretion to deny at time of site plan approval. Mark Nordland, Level 7 development, gave a presentation and spoke about grading and infrastructure work that has already been done and showed aerial photos on screen of the work. Mass grading is about 95% complete and they are working on finalizing roads so they can order stormwater structures and noted there is a supply chain issue with those but they are on order. The goal is to have all utility work and roads in by fall. They are working with staff to get building permits to begin construction of the first homes on site this fall, as well. He noted originally this property was going to be a regional mall and in many areas of the country those are being redeveloped as retailing has changed. This is why the developer has been coming back with changes to get the right product and make it successful. He spoke about consolidating the senior living into one building and adding row homes at the west end to further step the density before the apartments. Mr. Nordland noted the biggest concerns from the neighborhood meeting are traffic, density, and height. He spoke about the clay soil in Chanhassen and infiltration rates, noting they are using a stormwater re-use system on site to collect a majority of rainwater into ponds and irrigation on site will utilize that water. Mr. Nordland spoke about the entertainment district and they are retaining the original vision, however the original plan showed a movie theater which may not be the right choice. Their designers looked at options for the plaza area 104 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 5 showing winter and summer activities including skating rink, Christmas market, ice castle/sculptures, Christmas tree sales, concerts, movie nights, pickleball, bocce ball, outdoor dining, shuffle board, etcetera. He showed renderings on screen of winter and summer activities on the plaza. The hope is that people will come to the destination, park, and go to 3-4 different places during each visit. Ms. Aanenson spoke about comments received which are included in the packet and on the website. The Comprehensive Plan says 30% of the gross acreage multiplied by 16 units an acre equals the maximum number of units of 768. The current PUD includes approval for 250 apartment units up to five stories and the amendment seeks approval of 417 units and will remain five stories. The City does not have any policies to require the developer to include affordable housing. Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. Gary Haberman, 9036 Sunnyvale Drive, has a question about the electric power provider and if it has been designated or if there is a choice between Minnesota Valley Electric or Xcel Energy. Ms. Aanenson replied each has their own districts and whenever there is a project all jurisdictions that would have comment whether the State, the gas company, or electric company all get copies of this to see if they have any concerns. Mr. Henricksen clarified there are boundaries within Chanhassen dictating which service provider services those areas. Dave Howe, 400 Santa Fe Trail, lived in Highland Park which is a very busy business district and stated they closed Finn so people coming out of the shopping area cannot drive straight into the neighborhood and park. He brings this up because he is very concerned that people will find it very handy to drive across Mills Drive and park in the neighborhood which will create a nightmare for those living in that area. He stated it will be very difficult for those people if the City does not block Mills off. Mr. Howe stated there will be a lot of housing and cars on that west side and it will be so tempting to go across Mills Drive. He noted this is not Eden Prairie and there is a charm about Chanhassen. To put a giant apartment in there he feels that Eden Prairie is coming to Chanhassen which he does not want. He would like to keep the feel of Chanhassen cozier and he would like to see a tree-lined bike trail through the development to help it fit the vibe of Chanhassen. Jon Dimino, 9751 Meadowlark Lane, agrees that Chanhassen had a particular charm when he moved here 15 years ago. He noted adding five story apartments will change the whole nature of the area. He spoke about traffic and noted all the roof space and people concerned about CO2 and the environment but he has not heard anything about putting solar panels up to help supply power to the grid. Chanhassen should preserve the town for what it is, keep open spaces, and make sure they do not overburden it. A windmill could probably keep the whole thing off the grid. He thinks Chanhassen should be leaders and think about solar panels and windmills to be part of this development. 105 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 6 Jon Gilbert, 1641 Jeurissen Lane, agrees with all the points that were just made by neighbors. He has concerns about density, transportation, and the entertainment area. Regarding the entertainment area, the concept had nine buildings and now they have five buildings, less open area, they want to get rid of the theater, add 53 row homes, and move the apartment east. He spoke about density and noted it is not transparent to the public what the ratio is of 55+ independent living versus assisted living which goes back to the demands for senior housing. He spoke about pulling out the row houses and putting something more walkable, and creating a buffer other than more housing. Regarding the traffic study, he thinks they need a more comprehensive study to be done. Mr. Gilbert would have liked to have heard the questions before the public comment time. Zhexin Zhang, 1455 Bethesda Circle, asked if the 768 includes all townhomes, apartments, and row houses. Ms. Aanenson replied in the affirmative. She clarified each district calls out what uses can go in there. Mr. Zhang agrees with his neighbors that the density is a little over-the-top. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Schwartz asked the developer if there are any green building practices they will employ. Mr. Nordland replied in the affirmative stating they do not get the buildings LEED certified but are more focused on the design principles. Many of the design principles are pedestrian access, daylighting, bike racks, etcetera. Each individual project will be presented for site plan approval and can be vetted at that time for that level of detail. The approval today is for the PUD and concepts of what physically can go there but not the specifics on each building. Commissioner Schwartz asked if it is the City’s or developer’s responsibility to determine whether the builders adhere to environmentally sound building practices. Mr. Henricksen noted it is not in any of the City’s standard specifications. He does not believe there is a Code requirement and that staff’s responsibility is to be stewards of the Code and ensure that when developers come before them it is meeting all plans, Codes, ordinances, and standard specifications. Mr. Nordland spoke about water on the site and working with the Watershed District to mitigate that through rainwater reuses. Commissioner Noyes would like to talk about why the residential portion of the development is increasing so much and asked if it is demographics or lack of interest from retailers. Mr. Nordland shared in thinking about retail over the last few years, fewer square feet of retail is being constructed today as many more people are purchasing through e-commerce channels. 106 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 7 There is less demand for retail so they need to make it “special retail” and make it experiential so people want to go there. He shared they do not need as much brick-and-mortar space. In looking at the changes from 2020 plan to today there is less junior box-type space on the plan. He does not think it changes the number of bodies coming to the site and noted they are working with a grocer right now. He thinks about 5-6 acres out of 120 acres has changed since the last plan in adjusting retail to housing. Commissioner Alto asked about the senior housing and if that is assisted living and a senior home. Mr. Nordland stated the provider they are working with wants to do independent living, assisted living, and memory care. Commissioner Alto noted Bluff Creek Boulevard is creating a new entryway into the neighborhoods to the west where people can come right off 212 and cut through. She does not know how safe it is for seniors to be crossing from that senior center to the retail space. She suggested a walking bridge or something to create a safe pedestrian area. Mr. Nordland replied they are trying to make the road as calming as it can possibly be. Commissioner Schwartz asked if there will be underground parking to accommodate the entertainment, office, and retail traffic. Mr. Nordland noted the apartments will have below-grade parking for all residents, the senior facility will have 100% of their resident parking below-grade, the office buildings are built into the hill and will have underground parking, but all retail and entertainment will be surface parking. He explained walkways and sidewalks throughout the retail and entertainment area and connections to trails. Mr. Henricksen noted a condition of approval from engineering is to be able to see the roaming traffic study including vehicular and pedestrian connectivity site-to-site. Chair von Oven asked why people will come from other cities for this site. Mr. Nordland thinks it is the mix of offerings, food and entertainment, and when people think about what to do on a Saturday night they want this area to be the first thing that comes to peoples’ minds in Chanhassen and from the surrounding region. He noted they are also targeting entertainment restaurants right now which may offer things such as a pickleball, bags, and other games. Commissioner Schwartz asked how this will impact the City’s downtown core. Ms. Aanenson replied when they put the district together (regional and commercial) the intent was to add a different type of draw. They see the downtown as being for daily needs including City Hall, post office, big boxes, and grocery stores. The intent of this regional/commercial is for more specialty things. 107 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 8 Commissioner Schwartz spoke about page 6 of the report and staff being in support of the two senior housing developments being combined. Speaking as a senior, Mr. Schwartz would like to express a concern that this will effectively be warehousing these people in a mega-building. He is concerned about long distances and routes between parking garages, exits, public areas, and residences. As one gets older they are able to do less and less and he thinks many get hoodwinked into spending their senior years in places like this and many regret it. He would like to know staff’s comments on his opinion. Ms. Aanenson replied the vendor believes they can meet the needs of seniors and noted Mr. Schwartz can make any statement he would like and make modifications to the ordinance if he has the support of his fellow Commissioners. Mr. Henricksen noted regarding traffic they stick to the public right-of-way, look at site plans for traffic circulation, and said they take certain metrics into account for an elderly population. Once they know the end user they can look at whether improvements at an intersection are warranted for enhanced crosswalk treatments. Commissioner Goff understands the movie theater removal as they have all seen it post-Covid. He spoke about changes from a lot of retail, restaurants, and entertainment to housing with retail on the side. He understands they want higher density but thinks it is losing a lot of the character from when it came forth the first time. Mr. Goff thinks there is a different solution than the one proposed and while he is okay with the density he wants to see a different plan. Commissioner Johnson stated when he looks at the first drawing all he sees is parking lots and whether the pavement is any less now it looks more appealing and is not just a sea of asphalt. He noted it is intermixed with smaller retail buildings and the top view of the new layout looks more appealing to him. Commissioner Alto likes the row houses and thinks the apartments will happen regardless of the Commissioners’ opinion. She agrees with Commissioner Noyes about the way it is laid out and while she does not like that the entertainment space is smaller, she thinks it is important to still focus on that entertainment space. Commissioner Noyes noted one thing he does not like about the project and stated five story buildings do not seem like Chanhassen to him. He knows the apartments have been approved for that and he cringes a bit to think that they will move to one senior building that will be five stories. He liked the two senior buildings and agreed with the comment that it makes Chanhassen look like Eden Prairie. He does like the other things including the mix of retail, commercial, and open space but thinks the desire for higher density has really pushed the height issue. Commissioner Alto asked to see a review of what the Commission is looking at this evening. Commissioner Schwartz would like to request a modification to revert to two senior buildings rather than one building. 108 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 9 Chair von Oven noted any project that brings more senior housing to Chanhassen is appealing to him. He is not following the logic of why combining two facilities to have more resources available for seniors is a bad idea. He dislikes the idea of seniors walking back and forth between two facilities. Commissioner Schwartz is more concerned about quality of life than he is about quantity. He asked to imagine that some seniors can move on their own volition who park their car with several bags of groceries and must navigate through the parking garage, up elevators, and down extremely long hallways to get to their residence. He stated that is a challenge and when people start to get old and lose their marbles it becomes a problem. It is a matter of quality of life on a daily basis and to stuff 300 units into that kind of building is not right and is not treating people as human beings. Commissioner Alto noted they can only assume about parking and that memory care would be on the other side and they also must make the assumption that the company who owns facilities around the country and does this every day knows how to set up this large of a facility. However they are not at that stage in the project yet. Chair von Oven noted the thing that the Planning Commission is being asked to approve is the flexibility of one 300 unit building or remaining two 150 unit buildings. The Planning Commission will be at a point to evaluate each of the 27 projects and how the building will be brought to life. Ms. Aanenson replied that is correct. Chair von Oven feels the Commission gets some say on how the building will work down the road but today is not that day. Right now it is not a hang up for him and he wants to get the best vendor in there. Commissioner Schwartz replied if the vendor is truly a good vendor they ought to be able to design two facilities and make access to public areas, the garage, and areas that seniors really need. Mr. Schwartz thinks it is advisable to modify the request and require two buildings rather than one five story building. Chair von Oven thinks Schwartz could ask the Commission whether they are in agreement with striking item 3 in the list of detailed changes. Commissioner Schwartz asked if his fellow Commissioners agree with his concern and agree to delete item 3. Commissioner Alto does not support it. Commissioner Johnson does not support it. Chair von Oven and Commissioner Noyes stated the Commissioners know where they stand. 109 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 10 Commissioner Goff does not support it. Chair von Oven asked if a Commissioner has a major issue with the motion right now, what are those concerns. He specifically asked about item 4. Commissioner Noyes stated that is probably the only concern he has. He thinks it is a great project but does not like five story buildings in Chanhassen. He is not going to vote against it solely for that concern and noted they will have many more chances to have discussions on this development. Chair von Oven is in the same boat and noted there is a ways to go but it is a fantastic idea for Chanhassen. He stated they only get one chance to do it right and in looking at future projects, specifically the whole center and green space feels very different from what it was. It felt like the space has become so small and he asked what will draw people into that space from outside the City to hang out in that green space? He thinks it’s going to have to be a lot more than what is proposed. As they move forward and look at future individual projects on this property, Chair von Oven will be keenly looking for increases in green space. The gathering place sets this apart from everything else and he asks whether they table this in an effort to get more in the green space, although he does not want to be the guy that delays the project again. He reiterated this project will only be done right one time. He believes this is the right direction and tweaks can be made to the green space to keep people coming. Commissioner Alto asked if they can recommend the green space and entertainment space be revisited to the City Council. Chair von Oven agreed. Ms. Aanenson noted they could add that as item 8 to the requested changes. Mr. Nordland noted the plaza area programming is important and when it comes back before the City they can vote down the developer’s ideas if they have not succeeded. Ms. Aanenson suggested the developer goes back to the larger acreage they saw in the 2020 plan. Commissioner Alto suggested language that the regional draw/entertainment aspect of the project in terms of scope be increased. Ms. Aanenson suggested language encouraging the City Council to value the size, location, and configuration of the gathering space as it is integral to the project. Commissioner Goff noted he likes the more contiguous plan rather than having it all broken up. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Johnson seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve amending the Planned Unit Development, PUD-RC, Ordinance 657 for Avienda with details of requested changes: 110 Planning Commission Minutes – August 16, 2022 11 1. Adding 53 row homes between the townhomes and the apartments. 2. Increasing the number of apartments from 250 units to 417 units. 3. Provide flexibility to combine the two 150-unit senior housing developments to one 300- unit building at the southwest corner or develop as shown. 4. Allow southern senior building location to be up to five stories (if buildings are combined) 5. The northerly senior housing would be required to be a retail use if not senior housing. 6. Adds full-service car wash as a permitted use in District 3. 7. Shows potential locations for three to four additional drive-throughs (beyond the four already approved) but does not seek approval at this time. 8. The Planning Commission encourages the City Council to value the size, location, and configuration of the gathering place as an integral part of the project. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED JULY 19, 2022 Commissioner Alto noted the summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated July 19, 2022 as presented. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE: Ms. Aanenson updated the Commissioners noting a short-term rental ordinance is being drafted and the next Planning Commission meeting may be a work session. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Schwartz moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director 111 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated June 28, 2022 File No.Item No: D.3 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Amy Weidman, Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Receives the Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated June 28 , 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 112 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes June 28, 2022 113 CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 28, 2022 Vice Chair Markert called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Dan Eidsmo, Matt Kutz, Heather Markert, Don Vasatka, Scott Fischer, Youth Commissioner Alex Jerdee. MEMBERS ABSENT: Karl Tsuchiya, Jim Peck. STAFF PRESENT: Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; Priya Tandon, Recreation Coordinator; Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Manager; Adam Beers, Park Superintendent; Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator. PUBLIC PRESENT: None. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Vice Chair Markert spoke with Mr. Ruegemer about a Task Force Update which will be placed as item 5 under Reports. Commissioner Vasatka moved, Commissioner Eidsmo seconded to approve the agenda as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: APPROVE PARK & RECREATION MINUTES DATED MAY 24, 2022 Commissioner Kutz moved, Commissioner Vasatka seconded to approve the Minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission Meeting dated May 24, 2022 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. GENERAL BUSINESS: None. 114 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – June 28, 2022 2 REPORTS: 1. Recreation Center Quarterly Report Recreation Center Manager Sarles noted many things happening at the Rec Center and that the wall project has completely stalled and stopped as Hufcor has ceased global operations; Ms. Sarles stated she is working with the City Attorney about the issue. They currently have two walls and do not have the third. Regarding facility improvements, they gym and studio are closed the first half of August to have the floors sanded and resurfaced. Ms. Sarles shared about a bunny day in April including yoga with the bunnies and “hoppy hour” which was fun and brought attention to bunny rescue with many people donating towards the Companion Rabbit Society. The City also co-sponsored an event with the City of Victoria called a Superhero Party, the City had a dance recital, and are now into dance camps and summer activities. She noted they have hosted youth safety trainings including babysitting and Safe Kids 101, bicycle repair and maintenance classes through Bjorn Cycling, Fit for Life senior class, and many outdoor sports on the fields. Ms. Sarles spoke about Chanhassen Community Day, free trials on various classes, and working with Ms. Blazanin on a Senior 55+ Expo. Commissioner Vasatka noted the last time they spoke the Rec Center walls were the wrong size and asked if those were corrected. Ms. Sarles replied she has one wall that requires minor repairs between rooms 3 and 4. The wall between 1 and 2 is almost correct but was cut short which impairs the sound proofing. She reiterated they are working with the City Attorney to terminate the contract. Commissioner Vasatka asked how much has been paid for. Ms. Sarles replied they have not paid much, but there is a bill for $39,000 that has not been paid. What they have paid for are the track systems, soffit repair, and painting but not the physical walls. 2. 4th of July Celebration Preview Recreation Coordinator Tandon shared they are excited about the 39th annual 4th of July Celebration which brings participation levels of 70,000 people over 3 days. She spoke about Family Fun Night with discounted rides, pony rides, and a children’s performance in the Big Tent. The Street Dance is on July 3 with kiddie games, a kiddie parade, business expo, Taste of Chanhassen, live music, and more. Ms. Tandon noted many family-friendly activities on July 4 including fishing contests, medallion hunt, sand sculpture contest, live music, bingo, classic car show, parade, and fireworks. The City partners with many organizations including the Rotary Club of Chanhassen, the Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce, Minnesota Twins, Carver County Department of Public Health, deputies from the Carver County Sheriff’s Department, and representatives from Chanhassen Fire Department. Ms. Tandon thanked the City’s Park Maintenance team for support, set up, and teardown for the events. 115 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – June 28, 2022 3 3. Park Maintenance Quarterly Update Park Superintendent Beers shared an update noting 25 seniors from Southwest Christian High School participated in their senior service day project including pulling weeds, mulching, and picking up trash. Crews have been busy starting up and repairing the city's irrigation systems, which are about 30 years old. Mr. Beers noted as part of the 2022 Park Replacement Schedule, North Lotus Park hockey rink replacement will start within the next few weeks. The scope of the project will include the replacement of the existing boards, bituminous, and drainage system, and a new playground will also be installed at Roundhouse Park. Mr. Beers said the City just hired John Wickenhauser with the Park Maintenance Staff, and he gave a shout of to the seasonal staff that are a critical part of daily maintenance within the City. 4. Senior Center Quarterly Update Senior Center Coordinator Blazanin shared she has been focused on building a sense of community amongst the seniors and getting new people to come to events. They are also trying more unique classes including Women in Woodcarving, chair yoga, and Aging in Place classes. Trips and excursions are once again increasing after Covid-19 and there are many trips planned each month including Red Wing, the Orpheum Theater, New Ulm, St. Cloud, and the Guthrie Theater. She also spoke about the Dinner with the Mayor event which Mayor Ryan attended, music on the plaza, and the Lion’s Club picnic. 5. Task Force Update Park and Recreation Director Ruegemer updated the Commissioners noting at the last meeting they started developing ballot language and looked at some additional presentations on concepts for a new City Hall building. He noted the referendum may seem rushed for November and at last night’s City Council Work Session they discussed the referendum and took an informal survey of the Task Force members. After discussion, the list of items is being pared down, with the Task Force members understanding the current financial climate with inflation and interest rates and taxes going up. Currently the list has been pared down to about $16,000,000 with focus on Lake Ann Preserve, lighting at Lake Ann, bathrooms, a potential splash pad, inclusion playground, adventure/nature play, a challenge course, and trail updates. The City Council is also looking at whether this is the right time with the current economy. Mr. Ruegemer noted both the Task Force and City Council want to continue completion of the Lake Ann Preserve (the Prince property). COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS: None. COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS: Commissioner Vasatka noted he participated in the Nomadic Gnome which was apparently a successful program. Mr. Ruegemer agreed, stating it was hugely successful. 116 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – June 28, 2022 4 Commissioner Vasatka was able to visit 15 parks over three days and explored many neighborhood parks he did not know existed. It was a very fun program. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: None. ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET: None. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Kutz moved, Commissioner Vasatka seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:53 p.m. Submitted by Jerry Ruegemer Park and Recreation Director Prepared by Amy Weidman Administrative Support Specialist 117 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated June 17, 2022 File No.Item No: D.4 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jenny Potter, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Senior Commission Minutes dated June 17, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Senior Commission Minutes dated June 17, 2022 118 1 CHANHASSEN SENIOR COMMISSION MINUTES June 17, 2022 MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry Cerchia, Bhakti Modi, Ruth Lunde, Linda Haight, Jim Camarata, Kara Cassidy. MEMBERS ABSENT: Susan Kibler. STAFF PRESENT: Sharmeen Al-Jaff. GUESTS PRESENT: Dawn Plumer, Linnéa Fonnest. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Commissioner Camarata moved to approve the Agenda. Commissioner Cassidy seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried . SENIOR COMMISSION MINUTES DATED APRIL 15, 2022: Commissioner Lunde moved to approve the minutes. Commissioner Camarata seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. FALL 2022 AGING IN PLACE PROGRAMS: October is Age Well in Place Month. Multiple programs will be offered through the Senior Center addressing Elder/Estate Law, Reverse Mortgages, Financial Planning, Medical Insurance, Home Modifications, Cleaners, Junk Removal, Move manager, Safety. 50+ EXPO Mary Blazanin has arranged September 29, 2022 10:30 am – 2:30 pm as the date for the Expo which will be held at the Recreation Center. Chairman Cerchia requested the commissioners make themselves available to assist on the day of the Expo. MEMORIAL DAY FUNDRAISING 4TH OF JULY BINGO EVENT: The Senior Commission raised $1,270 to benefit the Carver Dakota Veterans Court. Chairman Cerchia, Commissioners Kibler and Haight staffed the tables for the event. 4TH OF JULY BINGO EVENT: Gifts continue to arrive. Commissioners will arrive at 10:00 am to assist with setup. ACT ON ALZHIEMER’S UPDATE-JULY 3RD PROMOTIONAL TABLE: Staff reserved a table. Commissioners will be there to assist staff on the day of the event. Dawn Plumer Public Health is administering a second COVID booster vaccine clinic for CDA senior apartment . This will continue through June. Linnéa Fonnest informed the commission that there have been drop ins requesting technical assistance. Most are 65+ years old. 119 Chanhassen Senior Commission Minutes – June 17, 2022 2 The Library is offering a three part series under the Generations category. Library staff shared the following information: Show Me Something: For example, teens could show seniors how to use technology to create art, explain the appeal of manga/anime/cosplay, and more of what people 55-95 might be curious about. Seniors could show teens how to make a positive first impression, non-tech games and hobbies, and more. It’s up to you. Each person who signs up to Show Something will have a table for demonstrations. Tell Me Something: Pairs of older adults (age 55+) and pairs of teens (ages 12-18) can sit together and chat using a set of basic instructions and conversation starter cards. Every 10 minutes, a librarian will signal the teens to move to another pair of seated seniors for a new conversation. Each person who participates in at least 6 conversations will receive a certificate for Community Engagement Hours. Teach Me Something is the last part in the series. Held outside on the plaza between the Chanhassen Library and the Senior Center or inside the Senior Center in case of severe weather. Presented in partnership with the Chanhassen Senior Center and funded by the Friends of the Chanhassen Library. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Cerchia called for meeting adjournment. Commissioner Camarata moved to adjourn; Commissioner Haight seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Prepared and submitted by Sharmeen Al-Jaff , Senior Planner 120 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Approve Claims Paid dated September 12, 2022 File No.Item No: D.5 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed By Kelly Grinnell SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated September 12, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The following claims are submitted for review and approval on September 12, 2022: Check Numbers Amounts 178094 - 178243 $285,180.20 ACH Payments $1,108,347.35 Total All Claims $1,393,527.55 121 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH 122 Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 9/2/2022 9:40 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount AFFEGR Affordable Egress Windows and Basements 08/18/2022 0.00 250.00178094 CARAUT CAR-CO AUTO PARTS INC 08/18/2022 0.00 25.19178095 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 08/18/2022 0.00 596.23178096 DAKSUP DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 08/18/2022 0.00 2,777.63178097 DecBaseC Deck and Basement Co 08/18/2022 0.00 250.00178098 DEMCON DEM-CON LANDFILL 08/18/2022 0.00 382.91178099 DurRaj Rajkumar Durairaj 08/18/2022 0.00 500.00178100 EARAND Earl F Andersen Inc 08/18/2022 0.00 1,018.55178101 EHLERS EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 08/18/2022 0.00 2,860.00178102 EmeTec Emergency Technical Decon 08/18/2022 0.00 3,392.38178103 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 08/18/2022 0.00 959.87178104 GerEli Elizabeth Germann 08/18/2022 0.00 500.00178105 GREMEA GREEN MEADOWS INC 08/18/2022 0.00 371.73178106 HartCom Hartman Companies 08/18/2022 0.00 940.00178107 HeaPar HealthPartners, Inc.08/18/2022 0.00 78,991.70178108 HENCOU HENNEPIN COUNTY 08/18/2022 0.00 2,000.00178109 HERLAN HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 08/18/2022 0.00 272.00178110 IndSig Indigo Signs 08/18/2022 0.00 1,924.87178111 LewLis Lisa Lewis 08/18/2022 0.00 275.00178112 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 08/18/2022 0.00 293.48178113 NahaShel Shelly Nahan 08/18/2022 0.00 770.00178114 NOVSOL NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 08/18/2022 0.00 12,647.39178115 RMBENV RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 08/18/2022 0.00 113.26178116 schcom Schwickert Company 08/18/2022 0.00 907.00178117 ShaMde SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 08/18/2022 0.00 1,784.75178118 SpaMark Mark & Kristin Spangrud 08/18/2022 0.00 250.00178119 STRDIM STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS INC 08/18/2022 0.00 500.00178120 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 08/18/2022 0.00 400.00178121 TFOFIN TFORCE FINAL MILE 08/18/2022 0.00 49.52178122 triedeea DeeAnn Triethart 08/18/2022 0.00 37.18178123 AmeMai American Mailing Machines 08/25/2022 0.00 995.00178190 APAGRO APACHE GROUP 08/25/2022 0.00 668.96178191 ARAMAR ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 08/25/2022 0.00 633.61178192 BCATRA BCA 08/25/2022 0.00 15.00178193 BecAre Becker Arena Products Inc 08/25/2022 0.00 51,533.55178194 BRYROC BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 08/25/2022 0.00 436.93178195 HayGre Carlson Hayes Group 08/25/2022 0.00 600.00178196 CenLin CenturyLink 08/25/2022 0.00 60.39178197 DAKSUP DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 08/25/2022 0.00 1,789.23178198 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 08/25/2022 0.00 728.27178199 FanMar Mario Fantauzzi 08/25/2022 0.00 50.00178200 GOGYMN Go Gymnastics 08/25/2022 0.00 2,520.00178201 hach Hach Company 08/25/2022 0.00 5,489.10178202 KozEli Elizabeth Kozub 08/25/2022 0.00 100.00178203 LimLon Long Lim 08/25/2022 0.00 150.00178204 MetGas Metro Gas Installers 08/25/2022 0.00 130.60178205 MINRUR MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 08/25/2022 0.00 150.00178206 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (9/2/2022 9:40 AM) 123 Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 08/25/2022 0.00 20,934.00178207 NieHar Harry & Judy Niemela 08/25/2022 0.00 35,000.00178208 POWPLA POWERS PLACE TOWNHOUSE ASSOC 08/25/2022 0.00 400.00178209 RMBENV RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 08/25/2022 0.00 113.26178210 sarljodi Jodi Sarles 08/25/2022 0.00 250.10178211 SchDav David Schumacher 08/25/2022 0.00 50.00178212 SonJod Jodi Sonju 08/25/2022 0.00 50.00178213 SOULOC SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 08/25/2022 0.00 2,507.50178214 SpaPet Peter Sparby 08/25/2022 0.00 100.00178215 SUBRAT SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 08/25/2022 0.00 1,410.00178216 POST POSTMASTER 08/31/2022 0.00 682.75178217 4pawsAn 4 Paws Animal Control 09/01/2022 0.00 175.00178218 Bohlma Bohlmann, Inc.09/01/2022 0.00 2,466.00178219 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 09/01/2022 0.00 714.46178220 COMTRA COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION09/01/2022 0.00 545.54178221 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 09/01/2022 0.00 795.03178222 DAKSUP DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 09/01/2022 0.00 1,235.86178223 EbeMic Michael & Joanna Ebeling 09/01/2022 0.00 100.00178224 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 09/01/2022 0.00 750.39178225 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 09/01/2022 0.00 7,718.45178226 GasCons Gassen Construction & Maintenance LLC 09/01/2022 0.00 303.93178227 GolfLak Golf Lakes Condos 09/01/2022 0.00 10,439.31178228 HartCom Hartman Companies 09/01/2022 0.00 3,726.50178229 LewiJim Jim Lewis 09/01/2022 0.00 50.00178230 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 09/01/2022 0.00 1,071.16178231 NasMec Nasseff Mechanical Contractors 09/01/2022 0.00 394.00178232 NicSta Stacey Nichols 09/01/2022 0.00 141.72178233 RegUofM Regents of the University of MN 09/01/2022 0.00 110.00178234 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 09/01/2022 0.00 129.42178235 SOULOC SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 09/01/2022 0.00 2,956.00178236 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 09/01/2022 0.00 572.00178237 TerSuo Terminal Supply Inc 09/01/2022 0.00 341.45178238 TruGre TruGreen Processing Center 09/01/2022 0.00 1,130.00178239 TruNoS TruNorth Solar LLC 09/01/2022 0.00 250.00178240 VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 09/01/2022 0.00 5,385.08178241 VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 09/01/2022 0.00 40.01178242 WesCra Craig Westermann 09/01/2022 0.00 50.00178243 Report Total (84 checks): 285,180.20 0.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (9/2/2022 9:40 AM) 124 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User:dwashburn Printed: 9/2/2022 9:41 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH z-airbnb Airbnb 07/18/2022 0.00 1,913.75 ACH Z-ALDI ALDI 07/18/2022 0.00 67.50 ACH z-amazon Amazon 07/18/2022 0.00 6,251.68 ACH z-antisy Antisyphon 07/18/2022 0.00 569.53 ACH z-apple Apple.com 07/18/2022 0.00 1.98 ACH z-arbday Arbor Day Foundation 07/18/2022 0.00 66.36 ACH z-batplu Batteries Plus 07/18/2022 0.00 298.36 ACH z-bitly Bitly, Inc 07/18/2022 0.00 35.00 ACH z-cabela Cabela's 07/18/2022 0.00 280.08 ACH z-cabfev Cabin Fever Sporting Goods 07/18/2022 0.00 561.60 ACH z-canva Canva 07/18/2022 0.00 119.99 ACH z-carcof Caribou Coffee 07/18/2022 0.00 22.42 ACH z-carcou Carver County Environmental Center 07/18/2022 0.00 222.50 ACH Z-CHIMEX Chipotle Mexican Grill 07/18/2022 0.00 310.89 ACH z-costco Costco Wholesale 07/18/2022 0.00 19.34 ACH z-cubfoo Cub Foods 07/18/2022 0.00 945.49 ACH z-dayinn Days Inn 07/18/2022 0.00 280.00 ACH z-dell Dell 07/18/2022 0.00 2,164.00 ACH z-denny Denny's 07/18/2022 0.00 61.16 ACH z-domino Domino's Pizza 07/18/2022 0.00 42.86 ACH z-fasten Fastenal Company 07/18/2022 0.00 533.49 ACH z-forsup Forestry Suppliers 07/18/2022 0.00 91.80 ACH z-galls Galls LLC 07/18/2022 0.00 241.53 ACH z-grain Grainger 07/18/2022 0.00 195.20 ACH z-grunde Grundens USA 07/18/2022 0.00 479.96 ACH z-haccom Hach Company 07/18/2022 0.00 920.64 ACH z-homdep Home Depot 07/18/2022 0.00 424.98 ACH z-HydPow Hydra Power Hydraulics Inc 07/18/2022 0.00 262.60 ACH Z-ICMA ICMA 07/18/2022 0.00 850.00 ACH z-jamsof Jamf Software, LLC 07/18/2022 0.00 126.00 ACH z-jimjoh Jimmy Johns 07/18/2022 0.00 83.20 ACH z-kwitri Kwik Trip 07/18/2022 0.00 4.49 ACH z-laserc Lasercrafting 07/18/2022 0.00 11.00 ACH z-lunbye Lunds & Byerly's 07/18/2022 0.00 11.98 ACH z-manufa Manufacturers Edge Inc 07/18/2022 0.00 455.16 ACH z-menard Menards 07/18/2022 0.00 285.94 ACH z-merlin Merlins Ace Hardware 07/18/2022 0.00 13.95 ACH z-mnagri MN Dept of Agriculture 07/18/2022 0.00 78.73 ACH z-mcfoa Municipal Clerk and Finance Officers 07/18/2022 0.00 51.48 ACH z-norame North American Safety 07/18/2022 0.00 147.60 ACH z-nortoo Northern Tool+Equipment 07/18/2022 0.00 118.60 ACH z-osha Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration 07/18/2022 0.00 117.00 ACH z-offmax Office Max/Office Depot 07/18/2022 0.00 147.08 ACH Z-oreill O'Reilly Auto Parts 07/18/2022 0.00 29.77 Page 1 of 3 125 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH z-panbre Panera Bread 07/18/2022 0.00 159.48 ACH z-post Postmaster 07/18/2022 0.00 3.75 ACH z-potbel Potbelly Sandwich Shop 07/18/2022 0.00 177.55 ACH z-pumala PumpAlarm.com 07/18/2022 0.00 49.99 ACH z-RedSav Reds Savoy Pizza 07/18/2022 0.00 96.63 ACH z-rei REI 07/18/2022 0.00 96.22 ACH z-Remark Remarkable Oslo 07/18/2022 0.00 7.99 ACH z-samclu Sam's Club 07/18/2022 0.00 133.62 ACH z-shotru Shorewood True Value 07/18/2022 0.00 9.49 ACH z-strapw Strapworks.com 07/18/2022 0.00 32.49 ACH z-strat Stratoguard, LLC 07/18/2022 0.00 195.20 ACH z-target Target 07/18/2022 0.00 101.00 ACH z-themus The Mustard Seed 07/18/2022 0.00 344.85 ACH z-twibal Twins Ballpark LLC 07/18/2022 0.00 1,791.00 ACH Z-USreba US Bank Rebate 07/18/2022 0.00 (1,590.91) ACH z-uscou US Couplings 07/18/2022 0.00 227.14 ACH z-USABlu USABlueBook 07/18/2022 0.00 4,504.40 ACH z-vonhan Von Hanson's Meats 07/18/2022 0.00 69.90 ACH z-zoom Zoom 07/18/2022 0.00 85.90 ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 08/18/2022 0.00 9,421.63 ACH BarEng Barr Engineering Company 08/18/2022 0.00 453.00 ACH BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS 08/18/2022 0.00 60.12 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 08/18/2022 0.00 641.08 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 08/18/2022 0.00 16,230.01 ACH CARSWC CARVER SWCD 08/18/2022 0.00 1,127.50 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 08/18/2022 0.00 8,051.17 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 08/18/2022 0.00 394.00 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 08/18/2022 0.00 1.53 ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 08/18/2022 0.00 9,617.31 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 08/18/2022 0.00 20.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 08/18/2022 0.00 83.12 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 08/18/2022 0.00 9,057.20 ACH BENSKAYEKAYE L BENSON 08/18/2022 0.00 588.00 ACH MatTri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 08/18/2022 0.00 216.50 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 08/18/2022 0.00 211.39 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/18/2022 0.00 338.19 ACH NYSPUB NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 08/18/2022 0.00 13,084.52 ACH PARCON PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 08/18/2022 0.00 37,592.92 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 08/18/2022 0.00 11,122.65 ACH PRARES PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 08/18/2022 0.00 930.00 ACH UniAth Universal Athletic Services, Inc. 08/18/2022 0.00 788.00 ACH VESSCO VESSCO INC 08/18/2022 0.00 433.10 ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 08/18/2022 0.00 170.58 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 08/18/2022 0.00 10,978.19 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 08/18/2022 0.00 5,462.32 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 08/25/2022 0.00 39.78 ACH DelDen Delta Dental 08/25/2022 0.00 4,154.84 ACH Avesis Fidelity Security Life 08/25/2022 0.00 284.47 ACH GSSys GS Systems, Inc. 08/25/2022 0.00 13,440.00 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 08/25/2022 0.00 6,986.06 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 08/25/2022 0.00 22,856.42 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 08/25/2022 0.00 388.00 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 08/25/2022 0.00 22,580.25 ACH Marco Marco Inc 08/25/2022 0.00 735.00 Page 2 of 3 126 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 08/25/2022 0.00 7,380.45 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 08/25/2022 0.00 3,606.63 ACH MRPA MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 08/25/2022 0.00 370.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 08/25/2022 0.00 104.27 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 08/25/2022 0.00 121.39 ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 08/25/2022 0.00 174.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 08/25/2022 0.00 21,949.34 ACH ZARBRU ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 08/25/2022 0.00 1,740.00 ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 09/01/2022 0.00 295.00 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 09/01/2022 0.00 321.47 ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 09/01/2022 0.00 67.80 ACH CRYINF Crystal Infosystems LLC 09/01/2022 0.00 298.00 ACH GMHASP GMH ASPHALT CORP 09/01/2022 0.00 757,433.03 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 09/01/2022 0.00 56.25 ACH KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 09/01/2022 0.00 3,556.03 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 09/01/2022 0.00 3,279.38 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergency Group 09/01/2022 0.00 32.06 ACH ManOil Mansfield Oil Company 09/01/2022 0.00 22,671.88 ACH MidAqu Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 09/01/2022 0.00 775.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/01/2022 0.00 145.13 ACH MOSBAR MOSS & BARNETT 09/01/2022 0.00 827.00 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/01/2022 0.00 307.62 ACH WatCon Water Conservation Services, Inc. 09/01/2022 0.00 698.13 ACH WAYTEK WAYTEK INC 09/01/2022 0.00 141.06 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/01/2022 0.00 582.18 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/01/2022 0.00 10,191.25 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 09/01/2022 0.00 36,271.79 Report Total:0.00 1,108,347.35 Page 3 of 3 127 AP Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 9/2/2022 9:52:41 AM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 4 Paws Animal Control 101-1260-4300 175.00 9/1/2022 Animal Control 175.00 9/1/2022 4 Paws Animal Control 175.00 Affordable Egress Windows and Basements 101-0000-2073 250.00 8/18/2022 Permit 2022-01721 - 8129 Dakota Ln - Erosion Control 250.00 8/18/2022 Affordable Egress Windows and Basements 250.00 American Mailing Machines 720-0000-4530 331.67 8/25/2022 Mailing Machine American Mailing Machines 700-0000-4530 331.66 8/25/2022 Mailing Machine American Mailing Machines 701-0000-4530 331.67 8/25/2022 Mailing Machine 995.00 8/25/2022 American Mailing Machines 995.00 APACHE GROUP 101-1170-4110 668.96 8/25/2022 Handsoap, Towels 668.96 8/25/2022 APACHE GROUP 668.96 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 342.18 8/25/2022 Coffee ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 154.92 8/25/2022 Coffee ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 101-1170-4110 136.51 8/25/2022 Coffee AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 1 of 16 128 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 633.61 8/25/2022 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 633.61 BCA 101-1120-4352 15.00 8/25/2022 Background Investigation 15.00 8/25/2022 BCA 15.00 Becker Arena Products Inc 401-0000-4706 51,533.55 8/25/2022 Dasher & Install 51,533.55 8/25/2022 Becker Arena Products Inc 51,533.55 Bohlmann, Inc.101-1550-4150 2,466.00 9/1/2022 Concrete Bench, Mounting Brackets 2,466.00 9/1/2022 Bohlmann, Inc. 2,466.00 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 720-7207-4150 436.93 8/25/2022 Materials 436.93 8/25/2022 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 436.93 CAR-CO AUTO PARTS INC 101-1220-4120 25.19 8/18/2022 Solvent 25.19 8/18/2022 CAR-CO AUTO PARTS INC 25.19 Carlson Hayes Group 101-1120-4300 600.00 8/25/2022 Emergency Operations Plan AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 2 of 16 129 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 600.00 8/25/2022 Carlson Hayes Group 600.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1530-4321 140.24 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 700-0000-4321 27.86 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1220-4321 155.55 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 701-0000-4321 27.86 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1171-4321 21.80 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1370-4321 222.92 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities 596.23 8/18/2022 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 596.23 CenturyLink 700-7043-4310 60.39 8/25/2022 Monthly Service 60.39 8/25/2022 CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 15.13 9/1/2022 Wireless Services CENTURYLINK 101-1190-4310 123.80 9/1/2022 Wireless Services CENTURYLINK 700-7019-4310 217.56 9/1/2022 Wireless Services CENTURYLINK 101-1540-4310 92.85 9/1/2022 Wireless Services CENTURYLINK 101-1160-4325 250.00 9/1/2022 Wireless Services CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 15.12 9/1/2022 Wireless Services 714.46 9/1/2022 CENTURYLINK 774.85 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 101-1550-4300 545.54 9/1/2022 Damage-Ped Station Hwy 5 & Century 545.54 9/1/2022 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 545.54 CORE & MAIN LP 700-0000-4550 795.03 9/1/2022 Valve, Crossarm AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 3 of 16 130 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 795.03 9/1/2022 CORE & MAIN LP 795.03 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 700-0000-4550 2,777.63 8/18/2022 Valve, Bracket Connects, Connectors 2,777.63 8/18/2022 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 700-0000-4550 1,789.23 8/25/2022 Repair Sleeve 1,789.23 8/25/2022 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 700-0000-4550 1,115.11 9/1/2022 Split Restraint Dip DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 700-0000-4550 120.75 9/1/2022 Follower Gland, Packing, Clow 1,235.86 9/1/2022 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 5,802.72 Deck and Basement Co 101-0000-2073 250.00 8/18/2022 Permit 2022-01771 - 7206 Purple Parkway 250.00 8/18/2022 Deck and Basement Co 250.00 DEM-CON LANDFILL 101-1320-4150 191.45 8/18/2022 Street Sweepings disposal DEM-CON LANDFILL 720-7207-4150 191.46 8/18/2022 Street Sweepings disposal 382.91 8/18/2022 DEM-CON LANDFILL 382.91 Durairaj Rajkumar 101-0000-2073 500.00 8/18/2022 Permit 2022-00512 - 8758 Bellevue Court 500.00 8/18/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 4 of 16 131 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Durairaj Rajkumar 500.00 Earl F Andersen Inc 101-1320-4560 1,018.55 8/18/2022 Channel Post 1,018.55 8/18/2022 Earl F Andersen Inc 1,018.55 Ebeling Michael & Joanna 720-7202-4130 50.00 9/1/2022 Tree Rebate Ebeling Michael & Joanna 720-7202-4130 50.00 9/1/2022 Tree Rebate 100.00 9/1/2022 Ebeling Michael & Joanna 100.00 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 481-0000-4300 1,365.00 8/18/2022 TIF Reporting EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 480-0000-4300 1,495.00 8/18/2022 TIF Reporting 2,860.00 8/18/2022 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,860.00 Emergency Technical Decon 201-0000-4705 3,392.38 8/18/2022 Fire Department Equipment 3,392.38 8/18/2022 Emergency Technical Decon 3,392.38 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1320-4120 311.72 8/25/2022 Supplies FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1220-4140 416.55 8/25/2022 Supplies 728.27 8/25/2022 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 700-0000-4140 156.80 9/1/2022 Splashwash FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1550-4140 156.80 9/1/2022 Splashwash FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1370-4170 279.99 9/1/2022 Drum EPV System FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1320-4140 156.80 9/1/2022 Splashwash AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 5 of 16 132 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 750.39 9/1/2022 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 1,478.66 Fantauzzi Mario 700-7204-4901 50.00 8/25/2022 Waterwise Rebate 50.00 8/25/2022 Fantauzzi Mario 50.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-1384-4556 174.82 8/18/2022 Water Meters Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 571.40 8/18/2022 Clamps Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 38.84 8/18/2022 Materials Ferguson Waterworks #2518 701-1384-4556 174.81 8/18/2022 Water Meters 959.87 8/18/2022 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 4,123.01 9/1/2022 Meter Parts Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 1,388.10 9/1/2022 MTR Frm & Cvr Swr, A1-CVR Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 2,207.34 9/1/2022 Clamp 7,718.45 9/1/2022 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 8,678.32 Gassen Construction & Maintenance LLC 101-0000-2033 151.79 9/1/2022 Duplicate Payment - 490 Mission Hills Way E - Permit 2022-02801 Gassen Construction & Maintenance LLC 101-0000-2033 152.14 9/1/2022 Duplicate Payment - 429 Rice Ct - Permit 2022-02735 303.93 9/1/2022 Gassen Construction & Maintenance LLC 303.93 Germann Elizabeth 101-0000-2073 500.00 8/18/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-02295 - 6431 Bretton Way 500.00 8/18/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 6 of 16 133 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Germann Elizabeth 500.00 Go Gymnastics 101-1538-4343 840.00 8/25/2022 Gymnastics Sessions Go Gymnastics 101-1537-4343 1,680.00 8/25/2022 Gymnastics Sessions 2,520.00 8/25/2022 Go Gymnastics 2,520.00 Golf Lakes Condos 101-0000-2076 10,439.31 9/1/2022 Security Escrow - Arbor Glen - Golf Lakes Condos 10,439.31 9/1/2022 Golf Lakes Condos 10,439.31 GREEN MEADOWS INC 101-1260-1193 132.72 8/18/2022 380 Deerfoot Trl GREEN MEADOWS INC 101-1260-1193 239.01 8/18/2022 320 Lake Drive 371.73 8/18/2022 GREEN MEADOWS INC 371.73 Hach Company 700-7019-4160 77.10 8/25/2022 Chemicals Hach Company 700-0000-4300 5,412.00 8/25/2022 Chemicals 5,489.10 8/25/2022 Hach Company 5,489.10 Hartman Companies 601-6043-4300 940.00 8/18/2022 Planting 940.00 8/18/2022 Hartman Companies 720-7025-4751 3,726.50 9/1/2022 Hillside Restoration 3,726.50 9/1/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 7 of 16 134 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Hartman Companies 4,666.50 HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 3,448.98 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 24,840.36 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 2,415.04 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.210-0000-2012 690.01 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,380.02 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 2,070.03 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,724.49 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 1,035.01 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 3,448.98 8/18/2022 September Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 37,938.78 8/18/2022 September Insurance 78,991.70 8/18/2022 HealthPartners, Inc. 78,991.70 HENNEPIN COUNTY 101-1150-4501 2,000.00 8/18/2022 Assessment Fees 2,000.00 8/18/2022 HENNEPIN COUNTY 2,000.00 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 700-0000-4150 90.66 8/18/2022 Dirt HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 101-1320-4150 90.67 8/18/2022 Dirt HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 701-0000-4150 90.67 8/18/2022 Dirt 272.00 8/18/2022 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 272.00 Indigo Signs 101-1170-4110 277.50 8/18/2022 Cubicle Wall Signs Indigo Signs 101-1550-4510 618.00 8/18/2022 ADA Face Plate Indigo Signs 101-1550-4120 764.37 8/18/2022 Vinyl Banners Indigo Signs 101-1550-4120 95.00 8/18/2022 Memorial Bench Plaque Indigo Signs 700-0000-4240 85.00 8/18/2022 Hard Hats decals Indigo Signs 701-0000-4240 85.00 8/18/2022 Hard Hats decals AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 8 of 16 135 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,924.87 8/18/2022 Indigo Signs 1,924.87 Kozub Elizabeth 720-7202-4130 100.00 8/25/2022 Tree rebate 100.00 8/25/2022 Kozub Elizabeth 100.00 Lewis Jim 720-7202-4130 50.00 9/1/2022 Tree Rebate 50.00 9/1/2022 Lewis Jim 50.00 Lewis Lisa 101-0000-2021 18.89 8/18/2022 Picnic Refund Lewis Lisa 101-1541-3634 256.11 8/18/2022 Picnic Refund 275.00 8/18/2022 Lewis Lisa 275.00 Lim Long 700-7204-4901 50.00 8/25/2022 Waterwise Rebate Lim Long 720-7202-4130 100.00 8/25/2022 Tree Rebate 150.00 8/25/2022 Lim Long 150.00 Metro Gas Installers 101-1250-3305 130.60 8/25/2022 Permit Refund - Permit 2022-02020 - 9941 Deerbrook Dr 130.60 8/25/2022 Metro Gas Installers 130.60 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 9 of 16 136 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 700-0000-4370 75.00 8/25/2022 MRWA Annual Operator Expo MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 701-0000-4370 75.00 8/25/2022 MRWA Annual Operator Expo 150.00 8/25/2022 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSN 150.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 700-0000-4509 20,934.00 8/25/2022 Community Water Supply Connection Fee 20,934.00 8/25/2022 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 20,934.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 293.48 8/18/2022 Supplies 293.48 8/18/2022 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 1,071.16 9/1/2022 V-belt, Bearing ASM, Radiator 1,071.16 9/1/2022 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1,364.64 Nahan Shelly 101-1538-4343 770.00 8/18/2022 Babysitting & SafeKids Training 770.00 8/18/2022 Nahan Shelly 770.00 Nasseff Mechanical Contractors 101-1250-3305 394.00 9/1/2022 Permit refund - Permit 2022-02936 - 18640 Lake Dr E 394.00 9/1/2022 Nasseff Mechanical Contractors 394.00 Nichols Stacey 720-7207-4150 141.72 9/1/2022 Reimbursement for fence repair AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 10 of 16 137 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 141.72 9/1/2022 Nichols Stacey 141.72 Niemela Harry & Judy 605-6502-4701 35,000.00 8/25/2022 Stipluation of Settlement - Parcel 11 35,000.00 8/25/2022 Niemela Harry & Judy 35,000.00 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 701-0000-4320 4,305.83 8/18/2022 Utilities NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 700-0000-4320 8,141.29 8/18/2022 Utilities NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 101-1350-4320 200.27 8/18/2022 Utilities 12,647.39 8/18/2022 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 12,647.39 POSTMASTER 720-1130-4330 136.55 8/31/2022 Utility Statements POSTMASTER 701-1130-4330 273.10 8/31/2022 Utility Statements POSTMASTER 700-1130-4330 273.10 8/31/2022 Utility Statements 682.75 8/31/2022 POSTMASTER 682.75 POWERS PLACE TOWNHOUSE ASSOC 720-7202-4130 400.00 8/25/2022 Tree Rebate 400.00 8/25/2022 POWERS PLACE TOWNHOUSE ASSOC 400.00 Regents of the University of MN 720-7202-4300 110.00 9/1/2022 Ash Yellow Derby Dr 110.00 9/1/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 11 of 16 138 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Regents of the University of MN 110.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 720-0000-4300 113.26 8/18/2022 Beach Monitoring 113.26 8/18/2022 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 720-0000-4300 113.26 8/25/2022 Beach Monitoring 113.26 8/25/2022 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 226.52 Sarles Jodi 101-1530-4345 250.10 8/25/2022 Kona Ice for Community Day 250.10 8/25/2022 Sarles Jodi 250.10 Schumacher David 700-7204-4901 50.00 8/25/2022 Waterwise Rebate 50.00 8/25/2022 Schumacher David 50.00 Schwickert Company 101-1170-4510 487.00 8/18/2022 Air Sensor Schwickert Company 101-1170-4510 420.00 8/18/2022 Remote Sensor 907.00 8/18/2022 Schwickert Company 907.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 101-1550-4150 129.42 9/1/2022 Paint 129.42 9/1/2022 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 129.42 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 12 of 16 139 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 720-7201-4300 1,784.75 8/18/2022 Yard Waste Disposal 1,784.75 8/18/2022 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 1,784.75 Sonju Jodi 720-7202-4130 50.00 8/25/2022 Tree Rebate 50.00 8/25/2022 Sonju Jodi 50.00 SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 101-1220-4510 567.00 8/25/2022 Service SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 101-1550-4510 1,940.50 8/25/2022 Service 2,507.50 8/25/2022 SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 101-1550-4510 1,657.00 9/1/2022 Repair/Replacement/Install SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 101-1530-4510 1,299.00 9/1/2022 Repair/Replacement 2,956.00 9/1/2022 SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 5,463.50 Spangrud Mark & Kristin 101-0000-2073 250.00 8/18/2022 7323 Paisley Court - Erosion Control - Permit 2021-05445 250.00 8/18/2022 Spangrud Mark & Kristin 250.00 Sparby Peter 720-7202-4130 100.00 8/25/2022 Tree Rebate 100.00 8/25/2022 Sparby Peter 100.00 STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS INC 101-0000-2073 500.00 8/18/2022 Permit 2022-00248 - 9117 Lake Riley Blvd - Erosion Control AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 13 of 16 140 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 500.00 8/18/2022 STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS INC 500.00 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 101-1310-4360 1,410.00 8/25/2022 2022 Membership Assessment 1,410.00 8/25/2022 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY 1,410.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 101-1350-4120 400.00 8/18/2022 New light fixture 400.00 8/18/2022 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 101-1550-4300 572.00 9/1/2022 Replace ballast and fuse 572.00 9/1/2022 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 972.00 Terminal Supply Inc 101-1320-4120 341.45 9/1/2022 Snow Plow Marker 341.45 9/1/2022 Terminal Supply Inc 341.45 TFORCE FINAL MILE 400-0000-1155 49.52 8/18/2022 Delivery - Cunningham 2nd Addition 49.52 8/18/2022 TFORCE FINAL MILE 49.52 Triethart DeeAnn 101-1170-4110 37.18 8/18/2022 Plates & Bowls 37.18 8/18/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 14 of 16 141 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Triethart DeeAnn 37.18 TruGreen Processing Center 101-1550-4300 1,130.00 9/1/2022 Lawn Service - Lotus Tennis 1,130.00 9/1/2022 TruGreen Processing Center 1,130.00 TruNorth Solar LLC 101-0000-2073 250.00 9/1/2022 Permit 2022-01724 - 3850 Glendale Dr - Erosion Control 250.00 9/1/2022 TruNorth Solar LLC 250.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1120-4310 273.85 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 569.10 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1220-4310 40.01 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1370-4310 89.59 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1540-4310 40.01 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1220-4310 702.75 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-0000-2033 11.08 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 720-0000-4310 433.46 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1170-4310 46.26 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 424.27 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1420-4310 46.27 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1250-4310 783.84 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1110-4310 40.01 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1160-4310 138.81 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 210-0000-4310 41.27 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1600-4310 201.29 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1312-4310 46.27 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1550-4310 962.17 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1530-4310 41.27 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1310-4310 166.82 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1520-4310 52.05 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1320-4310 274.64 9/1/2022 Wireless Services - August, 2022 5,425.09 9/1/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 15 of 16 142 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description VERIZON WIRELESS 5,425.09 Westermann Craig 700-7204-4901 50.00 9/1/2022 Waterwise Rebate 50.00 9/1/2022 Westermann Craig 50.00 285,180.20 AP - Check Detail-Checks (9/2/2022)Page 16 of 16 143 AP Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 9/2/2022 9:54:21 AM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 700-0000-4300 12,510.00 8/18/2022 Filter Evaluation Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 700-0000-4300 -1,544.18 8/18/2022 SCADA - Duplicate Payment Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 701-0000-4300 -1,544.19 8/18/2022 SCADA - Duplicate Payment 9,421.63 8/18/2022 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC 9,421.63 Airbnb 101-1120-4381 1,913.75 7/18/2022 Lodging - Conference 1,913.75 7/18/2022 Airbnb 1,913.75 ALDI 101-1560-4300 28.23 7/18/2022 Dinner with the Mayor event food ALDI 101-1620-4130 39.27 7/18/2022 Concert Series concession items 67.50 7/18/2022 ALDI 67.50 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 101-1220-4530 295.00 9/1/2022 Quarterly Air Quality Test 295.00 9/1/2022 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 295.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1539-4343 103.00 8/25/2022 Personal Training Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1530-4347 285.00 8/25/2022 Personal Training AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 1 of 25 144 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 388.00 8/25/2022 Al-Hilwani Juli 388.00 Amazon 101-1220-4290 5.50 7/18/2022 Gear Dryer Supplies Amazon 101-1170-4110 34.95 7/18/2022 meeting agenda notebooks for kim m Amazon 101-1170-4110 35.77 7/18/2022 cups for fire station Amazon 101-1160-4134 64.97 7/18/2022 Cat 6 cables for switches Amazon 101-1220-4120 -11.37 7/18/2022 Refund for Timer Amazon 101-1220-4120 46.96 7/18/2022 Washer Cover Amazon 101-1170-4110 39.98 7/18/2022 acrylic donation box for sharmeen Amazon 101-1220-4381 -60.00 7/18/2022 Refund for food for MCI drill that wasn't delivered Amazon 101-1616-4130 93.64 7/18/2022 Summer Discovery Playground program snack Amazon 101-1170-4110 -23.75 7/18/2022 booklet binding spines wrong kind returned Amazon 101-1170-4110 225.99 7/18/2022 HP Black Toner Cartridge for Finance Amazon 101-1170-4110 7.90 7/18/2022 Employee Badge Carabiners Amazon 700-7019-4160 19.24 7/18/2022 JC EWTP WWTP glass graduated cylinder Amazon 720-0000-4240 149.78 7/18/2022 BM Work Rain Boot for Ryan P in Water Resources Amazon 101-1220-4290 13.31 7/18/2022 Dry Erase Markers Amazon 101-1600-4130 529.10 7/18/2022 Replacement special event tents Amazon 101-1220-4290 25.77 7/18/2022 Gear Dryer Supplies Amazon 101-1220-4290 46.92 7/18/2022 Gear Dryer Supplies Amazon 101-1160-4530 340.66 7/18/2022 Replacement Door Strike Admin Bathroom door area spare Amazon 101-1170-4110 220.56 7/18/2022 Ink Cartridge for Badge Printer Amazon 700-7043-4160 918.23 7/18/2022 MW WWTP Rolling Scaffold Amazon 700-7019-4510 12.99 7/18/2022 JC EWTP Hose Clamp Assortment Amazon 101-1160-4134 61.88 7/18/2022 Cat 6 cables for switches Amazon 101-1616-4130 9.99 7/18/2022 Playground program supplies - Paper Plates Amazon 101-1160-4136 -100.28 7/18/2022 Camera mount returned did not work outside with other mount comp Amazon 700-7043-4510 47.99 7/18/2022 MW WWTP LED Clock Amazon 101-1220-4381 60.00 7/18/2022 Food for MCI Drill Amazon 101-1160-4131 152.75 7/18/2022 iPad case and Pencil for Rick Rice Amazon 101-1616-4130 8.99 7/18/2022 Playground program supplies - Googly eye stickers Amazon 700-7019-4160 16.97 7/18/2022 JC EWTP TDS Meter Digital Water Tester Amazon 101-1160-4133 1,118.22 7/18/2022 Wireless AP Public Works garage 1 spare Amazon 700-7043-4120 22.99 7/18/2022 MW Equip Maint - Tubing Amazon 101-1220-4290 12.56 7/18/2022 Gear Washer Timer Amazon 101-1613-4130 17.89 7/18/2022 4th of July Celebration supplies - Dry erase markers Amazon 101-1616-4130 39.47 7/18/2022 Playground program supplies - Plastic Folders/3 ring pouch Amazon 101-1616-4130 111.84 7/18/2022 Summer Discovery Playground program snack Amazon 101-1170-4110 14.94 7/18/2022 fan for av bldg AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 2 of 25 145 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Amazon 101-1170-4110 12.59 7/18/2022 memory card for communications Amazon 101-1616-4130 43.90 7/18/2022 Playground program supplies - Pro Disc Cones Amazon 101-1170-4110 -27.67 7/18/2022 booklet binding spines wrong kind returned Amazon 700-7043-4160 19.24 7/18/2022 JC EWTP WWTP Glass graduated cyclinder Amazon 101-1160-4201 7.83 7/18/2022 Serwer Televising Acces Fee May Amazon 101-1220-4290 132.83 7/18/2022 Gear Dryer Supplies Amazon 101-1616-4130 10.99 7/18/2022 Playground program supplies - Lanyards Amazon 101-1160-4131 719.99 7/18/2022 iPad for Rick Rice Amazon 101-1220-4120 32.65 7/18/2022 Hard Hats for FT Firefighters Amazon 101-1220-4381 33.74 7/18/2022 Supplies for Salvation Army for MCI Drill Amazon 101-1180-4110 182.27 7/18/2022 election/polling place supplies for Kim recycle/refuse container Amazon 101-1800-4130 49.14 7/18/2022 First Aid Kits Amazon 700-0000-4310 42.88 7/18/2022 BM Phone Clip Hoister Amazon 101-1170-4110 499.00 7/18/2022 camera lens for communications Amazon 101-1220-4290 159.00 7/18/2022 Gear Dryer Supplies 6,251.68 7/18/2022 Amazon 6,251.68 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 101-0000-2008 39.78 8/25/2022 August Payable 39.78 8/25/2022 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 Antisyphon 101-1170-4370 569.53 7/18/2022 Cyber Security Training 569.53 7/18/2022 Antisyphon 569.53 Apple.com 101-1220-4310 0.99 7/18/2022 iCloud Storage Apple.com 700-0000-4310 0.99 7/18/2022 BM iCloud Storage 1.98 7/18/2022 Apple.com 1.98 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 3 of 25 146 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Arbor Day Foundation 720-7202-4130 33.18 7/18/2022 Tree City USA flag for city hall backup Arbor Day Foundation 720-7202-4130 33.18 7/18/2022 Tree City USA flag for city hall 66.36 7/18/2022 Arbor Day Foundation 66.36 Barr Engineering Company 700-7025-4300 453.00 8/18/2022 Well Rehab Project 453.00 8/18/2022 Barr Engineering Company 453.00 Batteries Plus 101-1160-4150 298.36 7/18/2022 Batteries for UPS 298.36 7/18/2022 BATTERIES PLUS 700-0000-4530 60.12 8/18/2022 Battery 60.12 8/18/2022 BATTERIES PLUS 358.48 BENSON KAYE L 101-1539-4343 588.00 8/18/2022 Fit for Life Instructor 588.00 8/18/2022 BENSON KAYE L 588.00 Bitly, Inc 101-1125-4360 35.00 7/18/2022 Online subscription for short URLs 35.00 7/18/2022 Bitly, Inc 35.00 Boyer Ford Trucks 701-0000-4120 263.08 8/18/2022 Water Pump Boyer Ford Trucks 101-1320-4140 623.00 8/18/2022 Repair estimate Boyer Ford Trucks 101-1320-4140 -245.00 8/18/2022 Reman Motor Return AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 4 of 25 147 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 641.08 8/18/2022 Boyer Ford Trucks 101-1220-4140 321.47 9/1/2022 PadKit 321.47 9/1/2022 Boyer Ford Trucks 962.55 Cabela's 101-1540-4130 75.42 7/18/2022 Lifejackets Cabela's 101-1540-4130 81.86 7/18/2022 Lifejackets Cabela's 101-1540-4130 122.80 7/18/2022 Lifejackets 280.08 7/18/2022 Cabela's 280.08 Cabin Fever Sporting Goods 101-1613-4130 561.60 7/18/2022 Adult Fishing Contest Prizes 561.60 7/18/2022 Cabin Fever Sporting Goods 561.60 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-1140-4302 16,230.01 8/18/2022 Legal Services 16,230.01 8/18/2022 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 16,230.01 Canva 101-1125-4360 119.99 7/18/2022 Yearly online subscription to design software 119.99 7/18/2022 Canva 119.99 Caribou Coffee 101-1120-4372 22.42 7/18/2022 Coffee for Insights training AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 5 of 25 148 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 22.42 7/18/2022 Caribou Coffee 22.42 Carver County Environmental Center 720-7201-4300 222.50 7/18/2022 Electronic Recycling 222.50 7/18/2022 Carver County Environmental Center 222.50 CARVER SWCD 400-0000-1155 1,127.50 8/18/2022 Avienda - Monitoring 1,127.50 8/18/2022 CARVER SWCD 1,127.50 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-0000-4320 124.89 8/18/2022 July Utilities CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 701-0000-4320 1,442.93 8/18/2022 July Utilities CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1600-4320 32.39 8/18/2022 July Utilities CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1220-4320 135.01 8/18/2022 July Utilities CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 700-7019-4320 1,970.99 8/18/2022 July Utilities CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1350-4320 3,525.43 8/18/2022 July Utilities CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1550-4320 422.83 8/18/2022 July Utilities CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 101-1540-4320 396.70 8/18/2022 July Utilities 8,051.17 8/18/2022 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 8,051.17 Chipotle Mexican Grill 101-1110-4372 310.89 7/18/2022 Insights Training 310.89 7/18/2022 Chipotle Mexican Grill 310.89 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 700-0000-2008 15.30 9/1/2022 July Payable Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 701-0000-2008 15.30 9/1/2022 July Payable AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 6 of 25 149 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 101-0000-2008 37.20 9/1/2022 July Payable 67.80 9/1/2022 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 67.80 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4211 17.00 8/18/2022 Azure AD P-2 & Exchange P-1 - Sept COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4211 377.00 8/18/2022 Datto Office365 Backup Service - Sept 394.00 8/18/2022 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 394.00 Costco Wholesale 701-0000-4372 6.45 7/18/2022 CB Job Fair Chanhassen High School Recruiting Summer Help Costco Wholesale 700-0000-4372 6.45 7/18/2022 CB Job Fair Chanhassen High School Recruiting Summer Help Costco Wholesale 101-1320-4372 6.44 7/18/2022 CB Job Fair Chanhassen High School Recruiting Summer Help 19.34 7/18/2022 Costco Wholesale 19.34 Crystal Infosystems LLC 101-1170-4359 10.00 9/1/2022 Late Fee / Interest Crystal Infosystems LLC 101-1170-4110 288.00 9/1/2022 Toner Parks Office Printer 298.00 9/1/2022 Crystal Infosystems LLC 298.00 Cub Foods 101-1220-4372 33.72 7/18/2022 Food for Functional Exercise Cub Foods 700-7019-4160 0.75 7/18/2022 JC EWTP WWTP bleach Cub Foods 101-1600-4130 21.51 7/18/2022 Park Task Force - Snacks Cub Foods 700-0000-4372 17.32 7/18/2022 BM PW Appreciation Lunch Training Cub Foods 101-1620-4130 95.14 7/18/2022 Concert Series concession items Cub Foods 101-1540-4130 66.09 7/18/2022 Concession stand supplies Cub Foods 101-1220-4372 265.61 7/18/2022 Food for MCI Exercise Cub Foods 101-1560-4300 51.10 7/18/2022 Dinner with the Mayor event food Cub Foods 101-1616-4130 19.31 7/18/2022 Summer Discovery Playground program snack Cub Foods 700-7043-4160 0.74 7/18/2022 JC EWTP WWTP bleach Cub Foods 101-1540-4130 64.22 7/18/2022 Concession supplies AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 7 of 25 150 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Cub Foods 101-1560-4300 130.98 7/18/2022 Dinner with the Mayor event food Cub Foods 700-7019-4150 42.73 7/18/2022 JC EWTP TP/Trash bags/distilled water Cub Foods 101-1600-4130 37.79 7/18/2022 Task Force Snacks Cub Foods 701-0000-4372 17.32 7/18/2022 BM PW Appreciation Lunch Training Cub Foods 101-1320-4372 17.31 7/18/2022 BM PW Appreciation Lunch Training Cub Foods 101-1540-4130 37.87 7/18/2022 Concession stand supplies Cub Foods 101-1616-4130 25.98 7/18/2022 Staff training dinner 945.49 7/18/2022 Cub Foods 945.49 Days Inn 101-1320-4381 280.00 7/18/2022 AA Curtis Room Trainng for Class A CDL 280.00 7/18/2022 Days Inn 280.00 Dell 101-1160-4131 603.00 7/18/2022 Dell Monitors - Jill Sinclair Josh Girard and 1 stock Dell 101-1160-4131 777.00 7/18/2022 Docks for Finance Laptops - Danielle Kim & Ashley Dell 101-1160-4132 784.00 7/18/2022 1 Monitor for Finance 2 Monitors for Economic Dev Manager and 1 2,164.00 7/18/2022 Dell 2,164.00 Delta Dental 210-0000-2013 45.00 8/25/2022 September Dental Delta Dental 101-0000-2013 3,284.09 8/25/2022 September Dental Delta Dental 701-0000-2013 258.31 8/25/2022 September Dental Delta Dental 700-0000-2013 348.29 8/25/2022 September Dental Delta Dental 720-0000-2013 219.15 8/25/2022 September Dental 4,154.84 8/25/2022 Delta Dental 4,154.84 Denny's 101-1560-4300 61.16 7/18/2022 Cinn Rolls for Coffee on the Plaza event AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 8 of 25 151 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 61.16 7/18/2022 Denny's 61.16 Domino's Pizza 101-1616-4130 42.86 7/18/2022 Staff training dinner 42.86 7/18/2022 Domino's Pizza 42.86 Fastenal Company 101-1310-4240 351.07 7/18/2022 safety helmet Vest Glove Glasses Fastenal Company 700-7019-4510 182.42 7/18/2022 JC EWTP HCS 1-8 X 4 Y28/Yellow Zinc Fin 533.49 7/18/2022 FASTENAL COMPANY 101-1320-4120 1.53 8/18/2022 Supplies 1.53 8/18/2022 FASTENAL COMPANY 535.02 Fidelity Security Life 720-0000-2007 6.44 8/25/2022 September, 2022 Vision Fidelity Security Life 700-0000-2007 12.07 8/25/2022 September, 2022 Vision Fidelity Security Life 701-0000-2007 5.63 8/25/2022 September, 2022 Vision Fidelity Security Life 101-0000-2007 260.33 8/25/2022 September, 2022 Vision 284.47 8/25/2022 Fidelity Security Life 284.47 Forestry Suppliers 720-7202-4130 91.80 7/18/2022 DBH tapes 91.80 7/18/2022 Forestry Suppliers 91.80 Galls LLC 101-1220-4240 241.53 7/18/2022 uniform boots for DN AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 9 of 25 152 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 241.53 7/18/2022 Galls LLC 241.53 GMH ASPHALT CORP 601-6049-4751 757,433.03 9/1/2022 City Pavement Rehab Project (22-01) 757,433.03 9/1/2022 GMH ASPHALT CORP 757,433.03 Grainger 700-7019-4120 195.20 7/18/2022 JC EWTP Union Check Valve PVC 195.20 7/18/2022 Grainger 195.20 Grundens USA 701-0000-4240 179.99 7/18/2022 JC Clothing - Hi Vis Jacket Grundens USA 101-1320-4240 119.99 7/18/2022 JC Ryan Lannon Clothing- HI Vis Jacket Grundens USA 700-0000-4240 179.98 7/18/2022 JC Clothing - Hi Vis Jacket 479.96 7/18/2022 Grundens USA 479.96 GS Systems, Inc.701-0000-4300 6,720.00 8/25/2022 Aveva Renewal GS Systems, Inc.700-0000-4300 6,720.00 8/25/2022 Aveva Renewal 13,440.00 8/25/2022 GS Systems, Inc. 13,440.00 Hach Company 700-7043-4160 920.64 7/18/2022 MW WWTP KTO Chemkey 920.64 7/18/2022 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 10 of 25 153 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Hach Company 920.64 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 400-0000-1155 103.00 8/18/2022 Chanhassen - Deer Haven HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 400-0000-1155 437.75 8/18/2022 Chanhassen - Deer Haven HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 400-0000-1155 7,932.50 8/18/2022 Chanhassen - Berrospid Addition HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 400-0000-1155 721.00 8/18/2022 Chan Lake Place Apartments HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 101-1310-4359 10.82 8/18/2022 Interest/Late Fee HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 101-1310-4359 10.00 8/18/2022 Interest/Late Fee HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 400-0000-1155 283.25 8/18/2022 Chanhassen - Berrospid Addition HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 101-1310-4359 118.99 8/18/2022 Interest/Late Fee 9,617.31 8/18/2022 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 9,617.31 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 20.00 8/18/2022 Chemicals 20.00 8/18/2022 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7019-4160 6,986.06 8/25/2022 EWTP Chemicals 6,986.06 8/25/2022 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 7,006.06 Home Depot 701-0000-4551 206.97 7/18/2022 GF Sidewalk at LS 24 Home Depot 101-1220-4290 71.54 7/18/2022 Coupling hanger strap pipe Home Depot 101-1550-4150 137.63 7/18/2022 GB Plywood and Fastners for New Sandwich Board Signs Additions Home Depot 701-0000-4120 8.84 7/18/2022 JG Gen Maint - Bronze Ground Clamp 424.98 7/18/2022 Home Depot 424.98 Hydra Power Hydraulics Inc 101-1550-4120 262.60 7/18/2022 "CS 1 125"" x 2 25"" Cylinder" 262.60 7/18/2022 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 11 of 25 154 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Hydra Power Hydraulics Inc 262.60 ICMA 101-1120-4370 850.00 7/18/2022 ICMA Conference 850.00 7/18/2022 ICMA 850.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 83.12 8/18/2022 Office Supplies 83.12 8/18/2022 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 56.25 9/1/2022 Envelope Glue, Filing tab, Wastebasket, Receptacle, Pen 56.25 9/1/2022 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 139.37 Jamf Software, LLC 101-1160-4207 126.00 7/18/2022 Monthly MDM charge for ipads 126.00 7/18/2022 Jamf Software, LLC 126.00 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 101-1220-4260 100.80 8/25/2022 Equipment JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 201-0000-4705 22,755.62 8/25/2022 Equipment 22,856.42 8/25/2022 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 22,856.42 Jimmy Johns 101-1616-4130 83.20 7/18/2022 Staff training dinner 83.20 7/18/2022 Jimmy Johns 83.20 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 12 of 25 155 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 101-1370-4170 9,057.20 8/18/2022 Oil 9,057.20 8/18/2022 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 9,057.20 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 605-6502-4300 3,556.03 9/1/2022 Right of Way for CR 101 3,556.03 9/1/2022 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 3,556.03 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 601-6043-4300 1,661.25 8/25/2022 Minnewashta Parkway KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 400-0000-1155 16,209.00 8/25/2022 Development Inspection KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 400-0000-1155 1,335.00 8/25/2022 Development Inspection KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 210-0000-4300 3,375.00 8/25/2022 Metronet Support Services 22,580.25 8/25/2022 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 605-6503-4300 331.87 9/1/2022 TH 101 Reconstruction KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 605-6502-4300 2,947.51 9/1/2022 TH 101 Reconstruction 3,279.38 9/1/2022 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 25,859.63 Kwik Trip 101-1120-4372 4.49 7/18/2022 Bottled water for Insights training 4.49 7/18/2022 Kwik Trip 4.49 Lasercrafting 101-1170-4110 11.00 7/18/2022 name plate pt for chambers 11.00 7/18/2022 Lasercrafting 11.00 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 13 of 25 156 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Lunds & Byerly's 101-1120-4372 11.98 7/18/2022 Pastries for Insights training 11.98 7/18/2022 Lunds & Byerly's 11.98 Macqueen Emergency Group 101-1220-4140 32.06 9/1/2022 Filter O-Ring 32.06 9/1/2022 Macqueen Emergency Group 32.06 Mansfield Oil Company 101-1370-4170 10,194.98 9/1/2022 Dyed B20 ULS2 Clean 365 Mansfield Oil Company 101-1370-4170 12,476.90 9/1/2022 Conv 87 Oct E-10 22,671.88 9/1/2022 Mansfield Oil Company 22,671.88 Manufacturers Edge Inc 700-7019-4120 455.16 7/18/2022 JC EWTP March Mag Drive Certrifugal Pump 455.16 7/18/2022 Manufacturers Edge Inc 455.16 Marco Inc 101-1160-4411 735.00 8/25/2022 Copiers Lease 735.00 8/25/2022 Marco Inc 735.00 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.101-1370-4170 216.50 8/18/2022 Oil 216.50 8/18/2022 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 216.50 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 14 of 25 157 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Menards 700-7043-4150 145.74 7/18/2022 MW WWTP earmuff/bungee/clipboard/veg conc Menards 700-7043-4150 140.20 7/18/2022 MW WWTP pipe/anchors/PVC Cement/Adapter/ball valve 285.94 7/18/2022 Menards 285.94 Merlins Ace Hardware 101-1310-4120 13.95 7/18/2022 Caution Tape 13.95 7/18/2022 Merlins Ace Hardware 13.95 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 101-1250-3816 -74.55 8/25/2022 July SAC Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 701-0000-2023 7,455.00 8/25/2022 July SAC 7,380.45 8/25/2022 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 7,380.45 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 101-1550-4300 775.00 9/1/2022 Lake Treatment 775.00 9/1/2022 Midwest Aqua Care, Inc 775.00 MN Dept of Agriculture 101-1540-4300 78.73 7/18/2022 Food license 78.73 7/18/2022 MN Dept of Agriculture 78.73 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-0000-2022 3,680.29 8/25/2022 July, 2022 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-1250-3818 -73.66 8/25/2022 July, 2022 3,606.63 8/25/2022 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 15 of 25 158 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 3,606.63 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.101-1766-4300 370.00 8/25/2022 State Softball Tournament 370.00 8/25/2022 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 370.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 211.39 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities 211.39 8/18/2022 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 104.27 8/25/2022 Monthly Service 104.27 8/25/2022 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 36.37 9/1/2022 Monthly Service MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 108.76 9/1/2022 Monthly Service 145.13 9/1/2022 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 460.79 MOSS & BARNETT 210-0000-1193 827.00 9/1/2022 Professional Services 827.00 9/1/2022 MOSS & BARNETT 827.00 Municipal Clerk and Finance Officers 101-1120-4360 51.48 7/18/2022 MCFOA Annual Dues 51.48 7/18/2022 Municipal Clerk and Finance Officers 51.48 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 701-0000-4120 149.20 8/18/2022 Supplies NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 701-0000-4120 188.99 8/18/2022 Water Pump AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 16 of 25 159 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 338.19 8/18/2022 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1220-4140 121.39 8/25/2022 Water Pump 121.39 8/25/2022 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 701-0000-4140 39.49 9/1/2022 Filter NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 701-0000-4140 67.49 9/1/2022 Automatic Transmission Filter NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1320-4120 128.14 9/1/2022 Oil & Fuel Filter NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 101-1550-4120 72.50 9/1/2022 Oil Filter, Plug, Threadlocker 307.62 9/1/2022 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 767.20 North American Safety 101-1320-4240 147.60 7/18/2022 RL Safety Vest 147.60 7/18/2022 North American Safety 147.60 Northern Tool+Equipment 101-1550-4120 118.60 7/18/2022 GB Trash Picker Nitrile Gloves Safety Glasses Restock 118.60 7/18/2022 Northern Tool+Equipment 118.60 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 101-1120-4330 2,001.32 8/18/2022 Postage NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 101-1125-4335 11,083.20 8/18/2022 Fall Winter Recreation Catalog, Recycling Coupon Card 13,084.52 8/18/2022 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 13,084.52 Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration 701-0000-4370 19.50 7/18/2022 MW Training - Hazwoper 8hr Refresher Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration 700-0000-4370 39.00 7/18/2022 JC Training - Hazwoper 8hr Refresher Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration 700-0000-4370 19.50 7/18/2022 MW Training - Hazwoper 8hr Refresher Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration 700-0000-4370 39.00 7/18/2022 JJ Hazwoper Refresher Course AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 17 of 25 160 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 117.00 7/18/2022 Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration 117.00 Office Max/Office Depot 101-1160-4132 147.08 7/18/2022 USC-C Cable Ink Jet Cartridges 147.08 7/18/2022 Office Max/Office Depot 147.08 O'Reilly Auto Parts 701-0000-4120 1.07 7/18/2022 JG Gen Maint - Spark Plug O'Reilly Auto Parts 701-0000-4120 19.07 7/18/2022 JG Gen Maint - Funnel /Copper Plugs O'Reilly Auto Parts 701-0000-4120 4.81 7/18/2022 JG Gen Maint - Spark Plugs O'Reilly Auto Parts 700-0000-4120 4.82 7/18/2022 JG Gen Maint - Spark Plugs 29.77 7/18/2022 O'Reilly Auto Parts 29.77 Panera Bread 101-1420-4372 159.48 7/18/2022 economic development meeting cost reimbursed by other agency 159.48 7/18/2022 Panera Bread 159.48 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 701-0000-4551 1,888.50 8/18/2022 Repair settlement in sewer PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 701-0000-4551 4,176.17 8/18/2022 8040 Hidden Ct PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 700-0000-4550 2,884.00 8/18/2022 gate valve repair PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 700-0000-4550 6,988.50 8/18/2022 Frontier & Highland replace hydrant PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 701-0000-4551 2,911.75 8/18/2022 Install Dual Clean-Out PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 202-0000-4150 18,744.00 8/18/2022 Pioneer Cemetery - Service Work 37,592.92 8/18/2022 PARROTT CONTRACTING INC 37,592.92 Postmaster 101-1530-4130 3.75 7/18/2022 Certified letter to Hufcor AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 18 of 25 161 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 3.75 7/18/2022 Postmaster 3.75 Potbelly Sandwich Shop 101-1110-4372 177.55 7/18/2022 6/13/22 City Council Meal 177.55 7/18/2022 Potbelly Sandwich Shop 177.55 Potentia MN Solar 101-1170-4320 3,714.08 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities Potentia MN Solar 101-1190-4320 4,818.97 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities Potentia MN Solar 700-0000-4320 2,589.60 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities 11,122.65 8/18/2022 Potentia MN Solar 11,122.65 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 720-7202-4300 250.00 8/18/2022 Pheasant Hills Knotweed Control PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 720-7202-4300 680.00 8/18/2022 WWTP Prairie Management 930.00 8/18/2022 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 930.00 PumpAlarm.com 700-7019-4550 24.99 7/18/2022 JC EWTP WWTP Standard SMS Plan PumpAlarm.com 700-7043-4550 25.00 7/18/2022 JC EWTP WWTP Standard SMS Plan 49.99 7/18/2022 PumpAlarm.com 49.99 Reds Savoy Pizza 101-1110-4372 96.63 7/18/2022 councilworkshop 96.63 7/18/2022 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 19 of 25 162 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Reds Savoy Pizza 96.63 REI 101-1540-4130 96.22 7/18/2022 Kayak paddles 96.22 7/18/2022 REI 96.22 Remarkable Oslo 101-1110-4300 7.99 7/18/2022 Membership 7.99 7/18/2022 Remarkable Oslo 7.99 Sam's Club 101-1560-4300 133.62 7/18/2022 Robin Ruegg speaker lunch food supplies 133.62 7/18/2022 Sam's Club 133.62 Shorewood True Value 701-0000-4551 9.49 7/18/2022 GF Electrical Tape for LS 7 9.49 7/18/2022 Shorewood True Value 9.49 Strapworks.com 101-1220-4142 32.49 7/18/2022 Strap 32.49 7/18/2022 Strapworks.com 32.49 Stratoguard, LLC 101-1160-4205 195.20 7/18/2022 Proofpoint EMail Filter Service June 195.20 7/18/2022 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 20 of 25 163 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Stratoguard, LLC 195.20 Target 101-1616-4130 86.30 7/18/2022 Summer Discovery Playground Program replacement supply bins Target 101-1620-4130 14.70 7/18/2022 Concert Series kickoff event supplies 101.00 7/18/2022 Target 101.00 The Mustard Seed 202-0000-4150 161.82 7/18/2022 GB Replacement Sod at Cemetery The Mustard Seed 202-0000-4150 35.96 7/18/2022 GB Replacement Sod at Cemetery The Mustard Seed 701-0000-4551 147.07 7/18/2022 GF Landscaping for LS 24 344.85 7/18/2022 The Mustard Seed 344.85 Twins Ballpark LLC 101-1560-4300 837.00 7/18/2022 Tickets Twins Game trip Twins Ballpark LLC 101-1560-4300 114.00 7/18/2022 Tickets Twins Game trip Twins Ballpark LLC 101-1560-4300 840.00 7/18/2022 Tickets Twins Game trip 1,791.00 7/18/2022 Twins Ballpark LLC 1,791.00 Universal Athletic Services, Inc.101-1550-4130 788.00 8/18/2022 Bases, Pitching rubbers, Valleyball Nets 788.00 8/18/2022 Universal Athletic Services, Inc. 788.00 US Bank Rebate 101-1130-3903 -1,590.91 7/18/2022 US Bank Rebate -1,590.91 7/18/2022 US Bank Rebate -1,590.91 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 21 of 25 164 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description US Couplings 101-1220-4120 227.14 7/18/2022 Storz X Male 227.14 7/18/2022 US Couplings 227.14 USABlueBook 700-7043-4160 225.22 7/18/2022 MW WWTP Total Chlorine Chemkey USABlueBook 700-7019-4160 1,156.12 7/18/2022 JC EWTP Total Chlorine/Dissolved Iron/Fluroide Free Chlorine USABlueBook 700-7043-4160 92.23 7/18/2022 MW WWTP Disolved Iron Chemkey USABlueBook 700-7019-4160 369.82 7/18/2022 JC EWTP Total Ammonia Chemkey USABlueBook 700-7043-4160 1,227.52 7/18/2022 MW WWTP Free Ammonia & Mono Chloramine USABlueBook 700-7019-4160 304.08 7/18/2022 JC EWTP Orthophosphate Chemkey USABlueBook 700-7043-4160 920.64 7/18/2022 MW WWTP Free Ammonia & Mono Chloramine USABlueBook 700-7043-4160 208.77 7/18/2022 MW WWTP Free Chlorine Chemkey 4,504.40 7/18/2022 USABlueBook 4,504.40 VESSCO INC 700-7043-4120 433.10 8/18/2022 Primary Fluid 433.10 8/18/2022 VESSCO INC 433.10 Von Hanson's Meats 101-1220-4372 69.90 7/18/2022 Food for MCI Exercise 69.90 7/18/2022 Von Hanson's Meats 69.90 Water Conservation Services, Inc.700-0000-4552 698.13 9/1/2022 Leak Locate 698.13 9/1/2022 Water Conservation Services, Inc. 698.13 WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 170.58 8/18/2022 Concession stand supplies AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 22 of 25 165 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 170.58 8/18/2022 WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 174.00 8/25/2022 Concession stand supplies 174.00 8/25/2022 WATSON COMPANY 344.58 WAYTEK INC 101-1550-4120 141.06 9/1/2022 Cable Tie, Metri-Pack, Shroud Connector 141.06 9/1/2022 WAYTEK INC 141.06 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 420-0000-4150 287.37 9/1/2022 Sand WM MUELLER & SONS INC 420-0000-4150 294.81 9/1/2022 Sand 582.18 9/1/2022 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 582.18 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 420-0000-4300 10,978.19 8/18/2022 2022 Annual Pavement Inspection 10,978.19 8/18/2022 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1311-4229 2,500.00 9/1/2022 2022 DataLink Maintenance WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 700-0000-4300 875.50 9/1/2022 WTP Radon and Humidity Mitigation study WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-0000-4300 3,488.25 9/1/2022 Fox Hollow Drive Topographic and utility survey WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 420-1310-4546 486.00 9/1/2022 Annual Pavement Inspection WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 720-0000-4300 2,841.50 9/1/2022 Fox Hollow Drive Topographic and utility survey 10,191.25 9/1/2022 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 21,169.44 XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 5,462.32 8/18/2022 Monthly Utilities AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 23 of 25 166 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 5,462.32 8/18/2022 XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7043-4320 11,678.51 8/25/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 27.60 8/25/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 27.60 8/25/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 10,081.90 8/25/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 -7.60 8/25/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 80.17 8/25/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 27.60 8/25/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 33.56 8/25/2022 Monthly Service 21,949.34 8/25/2022 XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 309.62 9/1/2022 Fire Station, Library, Old Town Hall XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 151.17 9/1/2022 Parks XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 56.54 9/1/2022 Park Shelter XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 309.62 9/1/2022 Fire Station, Library, Old Town Hall XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 1,713.07 9/1/2022 Lift Station XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 20,953.56 9/1/2022 Signal Lights, Street Lights XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1190-4320 -402.62 9/1/2022 Fire Station, Library, Old Town Hall XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7019-4320 8,241.66 9/1/2022 East Water Treatment XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1550-4320 -256.64 9/1/2022 Parks XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1220-4320 1,418.06 9/1/2022 Fire Station, Library, Old Town Hall XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1312-4320 2,476.92 9/1/2022 Fire Station, Library, Old Town Hall XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1540-4320 1,551.30 9/1/2022 Parks XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1170-4320 -1,162.17 9/1/2022 Fire Station, Library, Old Town Hall XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1171-4320 63.76 9/1/2022 Fire Station, Library, Old Town Hall XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 847.94 9/1/2022 Lift Station 36,271.79 9/1/2022 XCEL ENERGY INC 63,683.45 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 101-1320-4120 1,740.00 8/25/2022 Disposable Gutter Broom 1,740.00 8/25/2022 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 1,740.00 Zoom 101-1160-4207 85.90 7/18/2022 Monthly Zoom Webinar charge Rec Center Admin AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 24 of 25 167 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 85.90 7/18/2022 Zoom 85.90 1,108,347.35 AP - Check Detail-ACH (9/2/2022)Page 25 of 25 168 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, St. Hubert Catholic Community, Harvest Festival on September 24, 2022 File No.Item No: D.6 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the request from St. Hubert Catholic Community for a temporary on-sale liquor license for their annual Harvest Festival on September 24, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY St. Hubert Catholic Community has submitted an application for a temporary on-sale liquor license for their annual Harvest Festival to be held on September 24, 2022. The event will be held in the church parking lot and they intend to sell beer and wine at the event. A certificate of liquor liability insurance is required to be provided prior to the event. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET 169 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request from St. Hubert Catholic Community for a temporary on-sale liquor license for their Harvest Festival to be held on September 24, 2022. The fee is $1.00. ATTACHMENTS Application for Temporary On-Sale Liquor License Event Map Certificate of Insurance 170 171 172 Certificate Holder Company Affording Coverage This Certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the holder of this certificat e. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded below. This is to certify that the coverages listed below have been issued to the certificate holder named above for the certificate indicated, notwithstanding any requir ement, term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the coverage afforded described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such coverage. Limits shown may have been reduced by paid claims. Type of Coverage Certificate Number Coverage Effective Date Coverage Expiration Date Limits Other D. General Liability Excess Liability Should any of the above described coverages be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will endeavor to mail ________ days written notice to the holder of certificate named to the left, but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company, its agents or representatives. Authorized Representative Property Occurrence Real & Personal Property Each Occurrence Each Occurrence General Aggregate Products-Comp/OP Agg Personal & Adv Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage (Any one fire) Med Exp (Any one person) Claims Made Covered Location Certificate of Coverage Date: Coverages Cancellationof CertificateHolder Annual Aggregrate Limit/Coverage Claims Made Annual Aggregrate Description of Operations/Locations/Vehicles/Special Items (the following language supersedes any other language in this endorsement or the Certificate in conflict with this language) 8/26/2022 Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis Chancery Office 777 Forest Street St. Paul, MN 55106 ST HUBERT CHURCH 8201 MAIN STREET CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 THE CATHOLIC MUTUAL RELIEF SOCIETY OF AMERICA 10843 OLD MILL RD OMAHA, NE 68154 8589 7/1/2022 7/1/2023 500,000 8 8589 7/1/2022 7/1/2023 500,000 Coverage is verified with regard to Covered Location's Harvest Festival to be held on parish grounds, September 24, 2022. Includes Liquor Liability. 30 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 0111013406 173 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Approve Fireworks Display Permit for St. Hubert Catholic Community Harvest Festival on September 24, 2022 File No.Item No: D.7 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Ana Fatturi, Fire Inspector/Admin Specialist Reviewed By Don Johnson SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a fireworks display permit for St. Hubert Catholic Community Harvest Festival on September 24, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY Fireworks Display for St. Hubert Catholic Community Event on September 24, 2022. Private pyrotechnic displays require a licensed contractor and approval of the Fire Chief and City officials. The Fire Chief/Fire Marshal will conduct a pre-launch inspection and verify operators' credentials prior to the event. Additionally, Chanhassen Fire Department will assign a fire suppression crew to the event. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 174 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Application for Outdoor Display of Fireworks 175 176 177 178 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Resolution 2022-XX: Authorize Entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with Carver County for a Cardboard Recycling Drop-off Site in Chanhassen File No.Item No: D.8 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution authorizing entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with Carver County for a cardboard recycling drop-off site in Chanhassen." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City of Chanhassen will partner with Carver County to locate a satellite cardboard recycling drop off site within city limits. The site will be managed and funded by the county. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The City of Chanhassen and Carver County are partnering to offer a cardboard recycling site within the city limits open to the public. The uptick in online ordering has generated an unprecedented amount of cardboard box material. Carver County Environmental Center has reported that the volume of cardboard materials collected at the recycling site has increased at a rapid rate. In 2019, the Center accepted just 179 under 100,000 pounds of cardboard. In 2020, the amount doubled to 200,000 pounds. In 2021, it approached 350,000 pounds. The drop-off containers fill faster than they can be switched out. For this reason and because Chanhassen residents comprise 38% of the participation visits to the Center, a satellite cardboard recycling site will provide a needed convenience to Chanhassen residents. The site selected is the Met Council waste disposal site on Park Place, just south of the Public Works facility. The site works well for the proposed collection because the presence of roll-off containers will not be visually offensive, there is easy access along with room for any potential vehicle stacking, and it can be visually monitored by City staff. The County will be responsible for the upkeep of the site, including the removal and replacement of full containers, as well as the signage for the site and monitoring any issues that may arise. The City’s contribution is the offer of a location and future public promotion of the site. The promotion of the site will be by word of mouth in the beginning in order to resolve any possible issues before higher volumes of participation are reached. The County will be monitoring the site in person weekly at the beginning to ensure that participation is occurring as allowed. Once the City and County feel confident that the operation is ready for higher volumes, the City will promote the site to residents through multiple media avenues. It’s anticipated that the cardboard recycling site will allow Chanhassen residents to conveniently and properly recycle cardboard materials within the City. This will help residents free up space in their home recycling carts and provide a recycling option for large pieces that are difficult to recycle at home. Additionally, it will allow residents to quickly recycle cardboard without having to wait in line at the Environmental Center. Staff believes this partnership to offer a cardboard recycling site within Chanhassen will be beneficial to all residents. BUDGET There is no impact to the City Budget. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council adopt a resolution to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Carver County for a cardboard recycling drop-off site in Chanhassen. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Chanhassen Carver County MOU-Cardboard Recycling 180 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 12, 2022 RESOLUTION NO: 2022-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTERING INTO A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH CARVER COUNTY FOR CARDBOARD RECYCLING IN CHANHASSEN WHEREAS,the City of Chanhassen is partnering with Carver County to locate a public cardboard recycling site on Park Place; and WHEREAS,cardboard box material has significantly increased in volume since 2019 to the point where material capacity at the Carver County Environmental Center is routinely filled; and WHEREAS,Chanhassen residents represent almost 40% of the Environmental Center’s participation; and WHEREAS,offering a locally convenient recycling drop off for cardboard material will benefit residents who can then properly recycle cardboard and save space in their home recycling carts, drop off oversized cardboard material, and avoid waiting in line at the Environmental Center; and WHEREAS,Carver County will fund and manage the cardboard recycling operations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby agrees to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Carver County for a cardboard recycling drop-off site in Chanhassen. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 12 th day of September, 2022. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 181 Cardboard Drop Site Memorandum of Understanding This agreement made and entered into by and between County of Carver, State of Minnesota, here inafter referred to as the “County,” 600 East Fourth Street, Chaska, MN 55318 on behalf of the Carver County Public Services Division and The City of Chanhassen, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the “City,” 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 5531 7.” The County and City agree as follows: 1. The City agrees to allow the County to place up to 2 roll off containers exclusively for cardboard recycling on City-owned property, commonly known as the former MCES Dump Site, located southeast of the Chanhassen Public Works Facility (“Property”). The location of the containers shall not interfere with other uses on the property, as determined by the City. 2. There shall be no payment for services. There is no cost to the County for using the Property for cardboard collection. 3. This agreement shall be in effect from the date of execution by all parties, or from commencement of services here under, whichever is first, and shall continue in effect until December 31st, 202 2 . Upon expiration, this agreement may be renewed for additional terms or e xtensions in writing by both parties, if there is mutual interest. 4. The County shall be responsible for arranging, scheduling, and paying for the containers, hauling, and processing of cardboard collected at the Property. The County will have the exclusive right to any material processing proceeds that might be generated from the collection of cardboard on the site. The County is responsible for removing all items or products of any kind disposed in the Containers , or in the areas immediately adjacent to the Containers. 5. The County shall provide staff to periodically insp ect the containers and the area immediately adjacent to the containers on an as needed basis, or as recommended by the City , and shall keep the containers and area immediately adjacent to the c ontainers in a clean and orderly condition in compliance with City Code . 6. The County shall provide adequate signage that includes County contact information, along with material collection limitations, hours of operation, etc . The City and the County agree that it is their intention hereby to create only the relationships of licensor and licensee, and no provision hereof, or act of either party hereunder, shall ever be construed as creating the relationship of lessor and lessee, principal and agent, or a partnership, joint venture or enterprise between the parties hereto. 7. Neither party shall assign, subcontract, transfer or pledge this Memorandum of Understanding and/or the services to be performed hereunder, without the prior w ritten consent of the other party. 8. Each party shall be liable for its own acts to the extent provide d by law and hereby agrees to indemnify, hold har mless and defend the other, its officers and employees against and all liability, loss, costs, damages, e xpenses, claims or actions, including attorney’s fees which the other, i ts officers and employees may hereafter sustain, incur or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of any act or omission of the party, its agents, servants or employees, in the execution or performance or failure to adequately perform its obligations pursuant to this agreement. In addition, the County hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless City and the City’s officers, agents, and 182 Cardboard Drop Site Memorandum of Understanding employees from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, proceedings, liabilities, damages, losses, costs, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, caused by, incurred, or resulting from the County’s occupancy, use or operation located on Property pursuant to this Agreement, or the use by its officers, agents, employees, guests or invitees. It is understood and agreed each party’s liability shall be limited by the provisions of Minn.Stat.Chap.466 and/or other applicable law. 9. The County shall, at its sole cost and expense, comply with any and all laws, statutes, ordinances, or regulations in connection with its use of the Property. 10. Either party may terminate the use of the Property as provided in this Memorandum of Understanding at any time by providing 60 -days written notice to the other party. Upon termination, the County shall remove the containers and return the area of the Property used by the County for the drop off to its original condition. The proper City official(s) having signed this Agreement, and the Carver County Division Director having signed this Agreement with the delegation authority approved by the County Board of Commissioners, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein and attached. CITY OF CHANHASSEN COUNTY OF CARVER BY:___________________________ ______________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor Division Director _______________________________ AND:__________________________ Date Laurie Hokannen, City Manager ____________________________ Date 183 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Christie Larson, Southern Valley Alliance - Domestic Violence Awareness Month Presentation File No.Item No: E.1 Agenda Section VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 184 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Ordinance XXX: RSI Marine, 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard: Consider a Request for Rezoning to Planned Unit Development with Site Plan, Consolidation of Lots, and Variances File No.2022-04A Item No: G.1 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves rezoning to Planned Unit Development, site plan, consolidation of lots, and variances subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY RSI Marine is requesting rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Site Plan approval for four boat storage buildings with a combined square footage of 85,200, vacation of existing drainage and utilities easements, consolidation of lots, and variances from the City’s vehicular area landscaping requirements. Note: Staff has updated the site plan agreement since the public hearing to include the following conditions: 1. If the property develops in phases the southern two buildings shall be constructed before the northern two buildings. 185 2. Conditions relating to the construction and expansion of public improvements (i.e. water and sanitary sewer). The details of these conditions can be found in the attached site plan agreement. BACKGROUND Level of Discretion The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying Rezonings because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Site Plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City has no authority in approving or denying the Consolidation of lots. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying Vacations because the City is determining if rights granted to the City are needed to serve a public interest. Public Hearing: On August 16th, 2022 the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval approval of all items. During the Public Hearing one member of the public expressed concern about future traffic impacts on this site as future properties in the area develop. Staff noted that traffic studies would be used to determine and address traffic impacts as part of each site plan approval associated with future development. During the meeting the Planning Commission made the following comments: Commissioner Schwartz asked if the proposed parking could accommodate multiple customers visiting the site at the same time. Staff clarified that the operator's business model restricts site access to staff. Commissioner Schwartz expressed concern about the amount of landscaping proposed for the site. Staff noted that the applicant is being required to meet the City's buffer yard requirements and cautioned that the architectural renderings did not reflect the amount of landscaping proposed for the site. Commissioner Noyes asked if the City is limiting potential redevelopment by approving this site plan. Staff explained that the applicant was being required to extend sewer and water so the site 186 would not inhibit future development to the east. Staff stated that ultimately market forces would determine when this site redeveloped and what form that redevelopment would take. Commissioner von Oven asked if a fence could be added. Staff replied that the applicant could add a fence so long as it met the requirements of the City Code. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting the City rezone the parcels currently addressed as 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard from Fringe Business District (BF) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and approve a site plan for two 20,000 square-foot and two 22,600 square-foot buildings which will be used for indoor boat storage. Their proposed site plan will require variances from the City’s vehicular area landscaping requirements. They are also proposing to consolidate the two parcels into one, which will require vacation of the existing drainage and utilities easements. They have stated that they envision this as a medium-term use, allowing for the improvement and reasonable use of the site until City sewer is available. They believe that once full municipal services are available, the site’s use will shift to include a commercial component and become a true mixed-use development. They have indicated that buildings will utilize high quality finishes, but that the use is not compatible with the City’s façade transparency requirements and that they are instead using architectural detailing to provide significant visual relief, as permitted by the City Code. They have explained that the nature of the business does not involve employees being on site, save to store and remove boats, and that there is no public access to the facility. Due to the fact that there are minimal parking areas and large open spaces are required to maneuver trailers, they have stated that installing landscaped islands as required by City Code is not practical. A fence and security gate may be added in the future to aid in site security. Staff believes the proposed PUD ordinance for the development will allow the applicant reasonable use of the parcel until City sewer becomes available, and that once full municipal services are available the uses permitted by the PUD will encourage the property to redevelop as a mixed-use center consistent with the parcel’s land use guidance. The proposed use meets a need for the community, generates minimal traffic, and can meet the majority of the City’s design and landscaping requirements. The variances requested are the result of the unique nature of the use and the practical difficulties the owner would encounter if they were required to meet the relevant standards. Staff is proposing conditions that would require future users without this unique business model to meet the design and landscaping requirements. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the PUD, Site Plan, Variance, Lot Consolidation, and Vacation. A full discussion can be found in the attached staff report. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve rezoning to Planned Unit Development, site plan, consolidation of lots, and variances, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 187 PUD Ordinance RSI PUD Staff Report Signed Findings of Fact and Recommendation Variance Document 22-04A Site Plan Agreement 2022-04A Letter of Credit Template Application for Development Review Project Narrative Responses to the City of Chanhasssen RSI Marine Storage Site Plan Review Set (06-13-2022) Updated Landscaping RSI MARINE Stormwater Narrative 06-01-2022 SET Storm Sewer Sizing Worksheet Storm Drainage Area Variance Request Landscape Islands Engineering Comments Carver County Memo Carver County Attachment Landscaping Comments Affidavit of Mailing 188 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described property (“Subject Property”) to PUD, Planned Unit Development: Lot 1, Block 1, Paws Claws and Hooves Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, Excepting Parcel 1C and Parcel 1D as shown on Carver County Right of Way Plat No. 29, Carver County, Minnesota. And Lot 2, Block 1, Paws Claws and Hooves Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, Excepting Parcel 1A and Parcel 1B as shown on Carver County Right of Way Plat No. 29, Carver County, Minnesota. Section 2. Flying Cloud Center Planned Unit Development Flying Cloud Center (PUD 2022-04A) A. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a Mixed Use PUD accommodating a mix of commercial, office, residential, and warehousing uses with the intention that the warehousing uses be phased out after municipal sewer becomes available. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for a greater variety of uses consistent with the property’s “Mixed” Land Use guidance and to allow for more flexible design standards in order to ensure a higher quality and more sensitive development. B. Uses The allowed uses in in this zone shall be as listed in this section. If there is a question as to whether or not a use falls under a stated category, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. a. The following are Permitted Uses i. Antennas as regulated by article XXX of the zoning code. ii. Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation iii. Banks and Financial Institutions iv. Brew pub, subject to the requirements of section 20-968. v. Brewery operated in conjunction with a taproom producing less than 3,500 barrels per year, subject to the requirements of section 20-969. vi. Clinics vii. Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores viii. Electronics and Appliance Stores ix. Food and Beverage Stores 189 x. Gasoline Stations xi. Health and Personal Care Stores xii. Microdistillery operated in conjunction with a cocktail room, subject to the requirements of section 20-967. xiii. Multifamily dwellings 1. Maximum of 46 units xiv. Offices xv. Restaurants xvi. Personal and Laundry Services xvii. Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, and Book Stores xviii. Warehousing and Storage 1. No new warehousing and storage uses shall be permitted for this PUD after municipal sewer becomes available. b. The following are Permitted Accessory Uses i. Accessory Solar Energy Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093). ii. Garage as part of a multifamily residential development. iii. Parking Lots iv. Signs as per allowed in a General Business District 1. Signs must reflect the quality of the development and must be architecturally compatible with the buildings materials and colors. v. Temporary outdoor sales and events (subject to the requirements of section 20-964) C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks a. Shall be as specified for the General Business District. b. Maximum height is as follows: i. For the principal structure, three stories/35 feet. ii. For accessory structures, one story/15 feet. D. Design Standards a. This area is part of the City’s southern gateway and as such it is expected that building elevations facing Highway 61 will exceed the minimum standards established by Divisions 7 and 9 of Article XXIII of the City Code. Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 2022, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor 190 (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on XX/YY/ZZZZ) 191 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: August 16, 2022 CC DATE: September 12, 2022 REVIEW DEADLINE: September 13, 2022 CASE #: PC 2022-04A BY: MYW SUMMARY OF REQUEST: RSI Marine is requesting rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with Site Plan approval for four boat storage buildings with a combined square footage of 85,200, vacation of existing drainage and utilities easements, consolidation of lots, and variances from the City’s vehicular area landscaping requirements. LOCATION:10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard APPLICANT:RSI Marine Rob Schatzle 1533 West 3rd Avenue Shakopee, MN 55379 PRESENT ZONING: Fringe Business District (BF) 2040 LAND USE PLAN:Mixed ACREAGE:8.33 acres DENSITY: NA FLOOR AREA RATIO: .235 LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying Rezonings because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Site Plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a Variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The City’s has no authority in approving or denying the Consolidation of lots. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying Vacations because the City is determining if rights granted to the City are needed to serve a public interest. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve Planned Unit Development rezoning, site plan, vacation, consolidation of lots, and variances, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” 192 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting the City rezone the parcels currently addressed as 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard from Fringe Business District (BF) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and approve a site plan for two 20,000-square foot and two 22,600-square foot buildings which will be used for indoor boat storage. Their proposed site plan will require variances from the City’s vehicular area landscaping requirements. They are also proposing to consolidate the two parcels into one, which will require vacation of the existing drainage and utilities easements. They have stated that they envision this as a medium-term use, allowing for the improvement and reasonable use of the site until City sewer is available. They believe that once full municipal services are available, the site’s use will shift to include a commercial component and become a true mixed-use development. They have indicated that buildings will utilize high quality finishes, but that the use is not compatible with the City’s façade transparency requirements and that they are instead using architectural detailing to provide significant visual relief, as permitted by the City Code. They have explained that the nature of the business does not involve employees being on site, save to store and remove boats, and that there is no public access to the facility. Due to the fact that there are minimal parking areas and large open spaces are required to maneuver trailers, they have stated that installing landscaped islands as required by City Code is not practical. A fence and security gate may be added in the future to aid in site security. Staff believes the proposed PUD ordinance for the development will allow the applicant reasonable use of the parcel until City sewer becomes available, and that once full municipal services are available the uses permitted by the PUD will encourage the property to redevelop as a mixed-use center consistent with the parcel’s land use guidance. The proposed use meets a need for the community, generates minimal traffic, and can meet the majority of the City’s design and landscaping requirements. The variances requested are the result of the unique nature of the use and the practical difficulties the owner would encounter if they were required to meet the relevant standards. Staff is proposing conditions that would require future users without this unique business model to meet the design and landscaping requirements. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the PUD, Site Plan, Variance, Lot Consolidation, and Vacation. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 19, Article VII, Surface Water Management: States standards required to meet goals and policies of the City’s Surface Water Management Plan. Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments: States process for amending the Zoning Code. Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3, Variances: States process and requirements for granting variances. 193 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 3 Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review: States process and requirements for granting site plan approval. Chapter 20, Article VI: Wetlands: States wetland buffer and setback requirements. Chapter 20, Article VIII: Planned Unit Development District: States expectations and requirements for Planned Unit Developments. Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial and Office- Institutional Developments: Stipulates design standards for Commercial, Industrial, and Office- Institutional developments. Chapter 20, Article XXIV, Off-Street Parking and Loading: States parking lot design and space requirements. Chapter 20, Article XXV, Landscaping and Tree Removal: States landscaping and tree preservation standards for developments. Chapter 20, Article XXVI, Signs: States requirements for signage. BACKGROUND In August of 1996, the City Council approved a site plan for the construction of an 8,152-square foot commercial stable and 12,936-square foot commercial kennel along with conditional use permits allowing multiple buildings on a single lot and permitting the commercial kennel and stable. Variances allowing metal siding for the stable and a pylon sign were also approved at this time. In July of 2005, the property was subdivided to create two separate lots, one for each of the principal buildings. In 2020, a portion of the property became right-of-way as part of the Highway 101 realignment and the western building was removed to make way for a construction staging area. In March of 2022, the City approved a Concept PUD for this property, subject to conditions of approval. In May of 2022, the applicant submitted an application for PUD and Site Plan approval; however, the application was deemed incomplete due to missing stormwater information. EXISTING CONDITIONS Site Constraints 194 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 4 The parcels are zoned BF with a combined area of 8.33 acres. The property’s existing BF zoning requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet with a minimum lot frontage of 100 feet, a minimum lot death of 150 feet, and maximum lot cover of 40 percent; however, this area is guided for mixed-use development in the City’s 2040 Land Use Plan which requires that the zoning be changed to PUD. A commercial kennel/stable formerly operated on the site. A well, retaining walls, an approximately 7,500-square foot asphalt parking area, an approximately 7,000-square foot gravel driveway, an approximately 8,000-square foot building, and an approximately 360-square foot shed remain from the previous business. Bluff Creek Corridor This property is not located within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Wetland Protection There is not a wetland located on the property; however, there is a small mange type 2 wetland in the ditch south of the property. As the applicant is proposing to utilize the site’s existing access to Flying Cloud Drive, the proposed development should not impact this wetland; however, the wetland buffer strip and setbacks for this wetland must be maintained. These wetlands have a 20-foot minimum buffer strip, 15-foot accessory structure buffer edge setback, and 30-foot principal structure buffer edge setbacks. This wetland, its buffer, and setbacks should be shown on the grading plan and staked in the field prior to construction. The buffer must be planted with native vegetation as outlined in City Code. Bluff Protection There are no bluffs on the property. The property has numerous steep slopes but none of them meet the City’s definition of a bluff (i.e. a natural topographic features with an elevation change of 25 feet or greater and a slope of 30 percent or greater). The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) also regulates steep slopes and the applicant will need to verify with the watershed district if the project triggers their Rule F – Steep Slopes. Shoreland Management The property is not located within a shoreland protection district. Floodplain Overlay This property is not within a floodplain. A small section of the ditch south of the property is 195 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 5 within the floodplain; however, no portion of the project will take place below the Base Flood Elevation (721’ contour). REZONING TO PUD Analysis The existing zoning of the property, BF, is not consistent with the land use designation of the property, Mixed. The Comprehensive Plan allows less intensive land uses to remain in place until municipal services become available; however, since water is now available to this site, any approval by the City for development of the property must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Surrounding Zoning And Uses The parcels to the east, west, and southeast of the subject parcel are also zoned BF. The other nearby parcels are zoned Agricultural Estate (A2) district. Nearby uses include nonconforming rental housing, a golf driving range, a used car dealership, a storage facility, and large lot residential properties. With the exception of the single-family residences, all of these uses are legal nonconforming, conditional uses, or interim uses. Land Use - Zoning Consistency As noted earlier, the parcels are guided for the Mixed land use category in the City’s 2040 Land Use Plan. The City’s Comprehensive Plan states that PUD zoning is the appropriate zoning for this land use category; thus, the use of PUD zoning, as proposed by the applicant, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s land use designation for these parcels. Justification For Rezoning To PUD Planned Unit Developments (PUD) provide for increased flexibility to develop a site by relaxing most normal zoning district standards, but in exchange for this flexibility they allow the City to require a higher quality and more sensitive development than would occur under traditional zoning. The City Code requires that PUDs encourage the following: 196 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 6 1. Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, mature trees, creeks, wetlands, lakes and scenic views. Finding. The applicant’s proposal leaves the area of the steep slopes on the western portion of the property undisturbed. The use of a PUD helps facilitate the consolidation of development to the property’s less environmentally sensitive area since it allow all four buildings to be placed on a single lot. Without PUD zoning, each building would need to be placed on a separate lot and the required streets and setbacks would result in greater disturbance to the site. 2. More efficient and effective use of land, open space and public facilities through mixing of land uses and assembly and development of land in larger parcels. Finding. The use of PUD zoning allows for reasonable use of the property in the short term while facilitating the long-term development of the parcel as a mixed-use center with a blend of complementary uses. The use of PUD zoning allows for multiple buildings to be placed on a single lot permitting a more efficient and effective use of land and allowing for shared parking and other synergies between uses that minimize the amount of impervious surface required for road and vehicular use areas. 3. High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Site planning, landscaping and building architecture should reflect higher quality design than is found elsewhere in the community. Finding. This area is intended to serve as the City’s southern gateway. For this reason, the PUD ordinance will require that building elevations facing Highway 61 will exceed the City’s minimum design standards. Proposed buildings will be reviewed through the site plan review process and be required to comply with this and all other applicable standards. 4. Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city will be encouraged. Finding. The mix of uses permitted by the PUD will create sensitive transitions between the mixed uses permitted near the intersection Highway 101 and Highway 61 and the future high density residential areas to the east of this site. As this corridor and intersection serve as the City’s southern gateway, a thoughtful and smooth transition between uses is critical. 5. Development which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 197 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 7 Finding. The use of PUD zoning sets up the framework for the property to develop as a true mixed-use district including retail, office, and residential uses once sanitary sewer becomes available to the site, while allowing immediate use of the site as a storage facility. Traditional zoning would not be able to accommodate both the short- and long- term usage of the site in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan requires PUD zoning for property’s with a Mixed land use designation. 6. Parks and open space. The creation of public open space may be required by the City. Such park and open space shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Park Plan and overall trail plan. Finding. The Comprehensive Park Plan does not propose public lands in this area. The preservation of open space and undisturbed areas on the site is facilitated by the consolidation of development allowed by the use of PUD zoning, particularly the ability to place multiple buildings on a single lot. 7. Provision of housing affordable to all income groups if appropriate with the PUD. Finding.Not applicable as part of this development; however, the PUD does permit multi-family housing which will increase the range and type of housing options available within the community. 8. Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sitings and the clustering of buildings and land uses. Finding. Energy conservation will be facilitated through permitting the clustering of buildings on a single lot. 9. Use of traffic management and design techniques to reduce the potential for traffic conflicts. Improvements to area roads and intersections may be required as appropriate. Finding. Appropriate traffic management techniques will be used. The developer and future site users will be required to use traffic demand management strategies as appropriate, which will be reviewed during the site plan review of projects within the PUD. For the above reasons, staff believes the applicant’s request for rezoning to PUD is justified. The proposed PUD ordinance is provided below: Flying Cloud Center (PUD 2022-04A) 198 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 8 A. Intent The purpose of this zoning is to create a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) accommodating a mix of commercial, office, residential, and warehousing uses, with the intention that the warehousing uses be phased out after municipal sewer becomes available. The use of the PUD zoning is to allow for a greater variety of uses consistent with the property’s “Mixed” Land Use guidance and to allow for more flexible design standards in order to ensure a higher quality and more sensitive development. B. Uses The allowed uses in this zoning shall be as listed in this section. If there is a question as to whether or not a use falls under a stated category, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. a. The following are Permitted Uses: i. Antennas as regulated by article XXX of the Zoning Code ii. Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation iii. Banks and Financial Institutions iv. Brew pub, subject to the requirements of section 20-968 v. Brewery operated in conjunction with a taproom producing less than 3,500 barrels per year, subject to the requirements of section 20-969 vi. Clinics vii. Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores viii. Electronics and Appliance Stores ix. Food and Beverage Stores x. Gasoline Stations xi. Health and Personal Care Stores xii. Microdistillery operated in conjunction with a cocktail room, subject to the requirements of section 20-967 xiii. Multifamily dwellings 1. Maximum of 46 units xiv. Offices xv. Restaurants xvi. Personal and Laundry Services xvii. Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, and Book Stores xviii. Warehousing and Storage 1. No new warehousing and storage uses shall be permitted for this PUD after municipal sewer becomes available. b. The following are Permitted Accessory Uses: i. Accessory Solar Energy Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) ii. Garage as part of a multifamily residential development iii. Parking Lots iv. Signs as per allowed in a General Business District 199 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 9 1. Signs must reflect the quality of the development and must be architecturally compatible with the buildings materials and colors v. Temporary outdoor sales and events (subject to the requirements of section 20-964) C. Lot Requirements and Setbacks a. Shall be as specified for the General Business District b. Maximum height is as follows: i. For the principal structure, three stories/35 feet ii. For accessory structures, one story/15 feet D. Design Standards a. This area is part of the City’s southern gateway and as such it is expected that building elevations facing Highway 61 will exceed the minimum standards established by Divisions 7 and 9 of Article XXIII of the City Code. SITE PLAN REVIEW The applicant is proposing two 22,600-square foot and two 20,000-square foot buildings which will be used for indoor boat storage. The applicant has stated that the site will have no outdoor storage or exterior trash receptacles. The applicant has stated that there is minimal need for parking as employees will only be onsite when loading and unloading boats and that the facility will not be open to the public. While the applicant is requesting site plan approval for all four buildings, the project will be built in phases based on cost and utilization. 200 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 10 Architectural Compliance Size Portion Placement The buildings will be arranged so that the storage bays face the interior of the development. Due to the proposed use and lack of public access, the buildings will not have a traditional main entryway, nor is it desirable for the building’s entrances to face the public streets. Since the only entries to the buildings are the interior oriented service and overhead doors the City’s entrance requirements do not apply to this development. The City Code also requires that buildings over 40 feet in width be divided into smaller increments through façade articulation. The buildings will use architectural towers, various siding materials and textures, and a two-tone color scheme to achieve articulation along the most visible southern and western elevations. These techniques combined with the proposed landscape plantings meet the intent of the City’s design standards, especially taking into account the constraints imposed by the nature of the use. Material and Detail The buildings will use a relatively small amount of brick for the architectural towers with the bulk of the buildings’ siding being either vertical metal siding with a stucco finish or metal tongue and groove lap siding with a woodgrain finish. The lower portions of the building and 201 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 11 areas not covered by siding will be color integrated concrete masonry unit rock face block. Higher quality materials are concentrated along the visible south and west facades, while the much lower visibility north and south are almost entirely comprised of the vertical metal siding. Given the nature of the use, staff believes the proposed materials are of acceptable quality. Color The building will utilize muted browns, grays, and off white colors to help the buildings blend in with the natural landscape. A two-tone color scheme is proposed to help break up the façade; however, there are no sharply contrasting colors and color integrated overhead doors are being utilized instead of white to avoid starkly contrasting colors. The proposed color scheme meets the requirements of the City Code. Height and Roof Design The buildings will be approximately 28.9 feet in height measured from highest grade to the midpoint of the highest gable, and will feature roofs with a 4:12 pitch. The tower portion of the southern building will have a height of approximately 34 feet measured form highest grade to the midpoint of the highest gable. Both the proposed building heights and roof configuration meet the requirements of the City Code, and the applicant has stated that no rooftop equipment is proposed, therefore rooftop screening is not required. The roof will be a medium bronze color metal roof. Façade Transparency The City Code requires that 50 percent of the first floor elevation viewed by the public include transparent elements such as windows or doors; however, it allows for buildings whose function does not readily allow for windows, such as storage buildings, to have reduced fenestration standards so long as sufficient architectural detailing is used. The most visible eastern and southern elevations of the proposed buildings range from between roughly 10 to 17 percent façade transparency. The applicant’s buildings propose using changes in colors, materials, and the presence of architectural towers to create architectural interest to compensate for the reduced façade transparency. Due to the fact that these buildings are unoccupied storage facilities and given the security concerns associated with requiring large ground level windows, the development qualifies for reducing the façade transparency requirements. Staff believes the proposed architectural detailing along the south and west elevations is adequate, especially since the applicant previously responded to staff concerns about the proposed façade transparency by significantly increasing the size of the windows in those elevations. Site Furnishings The nature of the applicant’s proposal, i.e. no permanent employees or public access, makes the inclusion of benches, tables, and chairs impractical and unnecessary. 202 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 12 Fence The applicant has indicated that a fence and gate may be added in the future. Any future fence would need to abide by the eight foot height limit, be located outside of the required front yard setback and sight distance triangle. The fence would also need to be located behind the required landscape buffers. A permit would be required prior to the construction of any future fencing. Loading Areas, Refuse Area, Etc. The applicant has stated that no external trash enclosures will be present on the property as the nature of the operation will not generate trash. All storage bays will be oriented towards the interior of the development and will be minimally visible from public streets. Lot Frontage and Parking Location Due to the fact that there will be no permanent employees or public access, the applicant is providing five parking spaces. The location of these spaces meet the City’s requirement that no more than 50 percent of the parking area shall be between the front façade of the principal building and the primary abutting street. ACCESS The preliminary plat abuts and gains access from Carver County right-of-way. Thus, the applicant must coordinate with Carver County regarding any additional considerations and potential conditions associated with easements for the property as well as any requirements associated with ingress/egress and construction activities such as during grading and hauling operations. The applicant will use the existing access to Flying Cloud Drive. Access to the site is currently had from Flying Cloud Drive (CSAH 61) and is located near the eastern property line. Since the property has access from a county road, a turnaround is being proposed as required by Section 20-1122 of the City Code. The preliminary plans indicate that the current access will remain and no additional accesses to the surrounding Carver County rights-of-way are proposed. The development will be required to construct a commercial driveway access in accordance with City standards. Any comments or conditions by Carver County associated with impacts to their rights- of-way must be adhered to and all permits required must be obtained prior to construction activities commencing. Carver County is requiring that the applicant shift the median on Flying Cloud drive west by 60 feet to accommodate truck and trailer left turns into the subject site. The applicant can coordinate with Carver County Public works on the design specifics. An access permit will be required for access to CSAH 61 due to the change in use. 203 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 13 EASEMENTS The preliminary plat provided dated December 4, 2018 and produced by James R. Hill, Inc., illustrates typical 10-foot public drainage and utility easements (DUE) along all property lines. Additional public DUEs were also provided over public utilities (only water main at this phase) extending into the property. The location of the additional DUE over the public water main are subject to change upon addressing the conditions associated with the public water main as discussed under the “Sanitary Sewer and Water Main” section of this report Any and all existing easements must be vacated as proposed prior to recording of the final plat. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The existing conditions plan sheet and drainage maps included in the submittal show an existing building near the center of the property with access to Great Plains Boulevard provided by an asphalt parking area and gravel driveway. Stormwater runoff generally flows from north to south down the slope of the site where it enters a drainage swale along Flying Cloud Drive. The drainage swale conveys stormwater from west to east. Stormwater leaves the site by way of an existing 48” culvert under Flying Cloud Drive which conveys the stormwater to the south through stormwater pond Bluff Creek 9-2-1 and into Bluff Creek before ultimately outleting to the Minnesota River. The preliminary plans provided with the submittal show a significant amount of grading. The design steepens the hill on the northeast side of the site to create a flat area conducive for the four proposed buildings with access and parking. The proposed design uses a combination of drainage swales and stormwater infrastructure to collect and convey stormwater into a Best Management Practice (BMP) located on the southwest corner of the property. The design shows stormwater being conveyed from the proposed BMP to the existing swale along Flying Cloud Blvd through an outlet control structure. Any impacts to Carver County’s right-of-way must be approved and permitted by the County prior to construction activities. The overall design of the stormwater infrastructure mimics the flow path of the existing condition and acts to convey stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces through water quality BMPs. The Hydrologic and Hydraulic HydroCAD models show the site is decreasing rates leaving the site for the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm events. Carver County is requesting drainage calculations and data for the proposed development and is requesting that the applicant’s engineer meet with them to confirm the stormwater calculations. They have expressed concern regarding the outlet for the proposed stormwater treatment ponds which is up gradient from the trail below. They have indicated that drainage should be directed further east into the existing ditch rather than to the west side of the development. The proposed drainage must not adversely impact the County right of way and must be compatible with the 204 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 14 existing ground in the County right of way. The County will need to review and approve the final grading plans, and a grading permit will be required for grading work within the highway right- of-way. EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has prepared and submitted a preliminary Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and it generally appears feasible. The SWPPP is a required submittal element for preliminary plat review. No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is developed. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements as listed in Parts III and IV of the permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub-contractors are identified and as other conditions change. RETAINING WALLS A retaining wall with a maximum height of approximately seven feet is being proposed on the north side of the property as well as a retaining wall with a maximum height of approximately four feet along the east side of the property. The applicant has stated that they will use a modular block gravity retaining wall system and has acknowledged the City’s requirement that permits are required for all walls with engineered designs being required for walls over four feet in height. Portions of the retaining walls are illustrated to be either close to or directly over the eastern property line. Due to the proximity to the property line, staff is concerned that the construction of these walls would require construction activities to occur on the abutting property. If this is the case, the construction of any improvements that impact or require access to abutting properties must have the appropriate right-of-entry agreements and/or temporary construction easements prior to construction operations commencing. LANDSCAPING A PUD is expected to ‘protect… mature trees…’ and ‘reflect higher quality design of…landscaping’. Existing vegetation on the site consists of many pioneer tree species. These types of trees that are the first to populate a site, often after a disturbance. Common species on the site include box elder, 205 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 15 Siberian elm, green ash, cottonwood, and hackberry. The applicant is able to save the existing trees along the north property line adjacent to the regional trail corridor which is a mix of hackberry, elm and box elder. While the elm and box elder may not be highly desirable trees, they do provide nesting and habitat for birds and pollinators. Preserving these trees also helps to meet buffer yard requirements for the north property line. The applicant is proposing a native prairie seed mix along the north property line. This location is ideal for a dry prairie seed mix that will work to provide habitat on site, provided that the proper establishment of the seed is followed. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a 3-year prairie management contract to ensure the establishment of the native plants. The applicant is proposing a diverse mix of tree and shrub species but needs to incorporate two additional understory genera in order to meet minimum diversity as required by ordinance so that no genus has more than 10 trees in quantity. Buffer yard plantings are required along the property lines. The landscape plan shows the following proposed landscaping for the site, which does not meet the minimum requirements for 206 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 16 buffer yard plantings on the south, west and east sides of the site. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to meet the minimum requirements for buffer yards in these areas. Required plantings Proposed plantings Buffer yard A – North prop. line, Regional Trail, 780’ 7 overstory trees 14 Understory trees 21 Shrubs 19 overstory trees - existing 0 Understory trees 46 Shrubs Buffer yard B – South prop. Line, Hwy 61, 700’ 14 overstory trees 28 understory trees 42 shrubs 11 overstory trees 23 understory trees 25 shrubs Buffer yard B –west prop. line, Hwy 101 Great Plains Blvd, 500’ 10 Overstory trees 20 Understory trees 30 Shrubs 5 Overstory trees 8 Understory trees 20 Shrubs Buffer yard A - East property line, 460’ 4 Overstory trees 9 Understory trees 13 Shrubs 4 Overstory trees 8 Understory trees 12 Shrubs The vehicular use area is required by Code to have landscaping that includes islands or peninsulas for every 6,000 sq. ft. of use area as well as landscaped areas and trees in and around the parking area in order to reduce the overall heat island effect of pavement and improve aesthetics of the site. Minimum requirements for landscaping for the parking lot include 3,090 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, five landscaped islands or peninsulas, and 12 trees for the parking lot. The applicant’s proposed landscaping as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table: Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 3,090 sq. ft.0 sq. ft. Trees/parking lot 12 trees 0 trees Landscape islands or peninsulas/parking lot 5 islands/peninsulas 0 islands/peninsulas The applicant has requested a variance from this standard due to the fact that they are only creating five parking stalls and the rest of the vehicular use area needs to be unobstructed to facilitate truck and trailer movements. Since landscaped islands would impede safe and efficient traffic movement on the site, staff supports the variance request to not install landscape islands in the vehicular use area; however, when the use of the site changes and parking is included, then all landscaped islands and/or peninsulas required by Code shall be installed. LIGHTING One LED light along the driveway is proposed to be mounted approximately 10 feet above grade and LED lights in decorative housing will be mounted approximately 10 feet above grade along 207 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 17 the building facades fronting the vehicular use area. Details were not provided for the proposed housings; however, both the pole and building mounted lights will need to be shielded with a total cutoff angle equal to or less than 90 degrees. Staff believes the proposed lighting is adequate for the intended use as there is no parking lot or public access to the site. SIGNAGE No signage is planned or being proposed at this time. The PUD will incorporate the requirements of the City’s Sign Code for the General Business (BG) District and require that all signage be architecturally compatible with buildings’ materials and colors. If signage is proposed in the future, it will require a permit and be reviewed for compliance with these standards. MISCELLANEOUS If an HVAC system is required, any and all exterior components will need to be screened from public view, either through the use of materials similar to the building materials or by using heavy landscaping that will be effective in winter. Section 2902.1 of the International Building Code exempts structures that are typically unoccupied from needing to provide restroom facilities. As these buildings will be used for storage and will not have permanent employees on site, the City is waiving the requirement to provide bathrooms. Since no bathrooms are required, a septic system will not need to be installed. Based on Carver County property information there appears to be two parcels abutting the preliminary plat’s eastern property lines that are listed as “Parcel ID: Gap”. It is unclear if these parcels are being considered in the lot combination of the PUD, or if they are being considered a part of the adjacent lot to the west (PID #250361300). Clarification regarding the status of “Parcel ID: Gap” in conjunction with the proposed plat will be required prior to recording of the final plat from either the County or the applicant. The technical details of the final plant will need to be reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. PARKS In 2005, a Stipulation of Settlement (Court File No. 10-CV-05-48) between PCH Development, LLC and the City of Chanhassen was agreed to regarding the Park Dedication fees and Surface Water Management fees surrounding the subdivision of the “Paws Claws and Hooves Addition” subdivision (Planning Case #2003-04 and the property of this Conceptual PUD). The Park fee was reduced to $2,800. The settlement agreement states, “If all or any part of the property is changed to a different principal use or further subdivided, the property shall be subject to payment of additional Park Dedication and Surface Water Management fees based upon the rates in effect at that time applicable to the proposed use and type of municipal approval requested.” However, as the stipulation was between the property owner and the City and was not required to 208 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 18 be memorialized against the property, when the property owner changed from PCH Development, LLC the agreement ceased to be in force. As a result, no Park fees will be required. If the property is subdivided in the future, Park fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $2,800.00 already paid. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The project site is located within the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD). The proposed development will exceed the one (1) acre of new impervious area and will therefore require permanent stormwater BMPs to be constructed as part of this project and maintained by the owner. The project will be subject to stormwater regulations outlined under LMRWD Rule D including rate, volume, and water quality. Based on the LMRWD’s website, a portion of the site includes Steep Slopes as defined by the LMRWD and will be required to meet LMRWD Rule F. The City of Chanhassen also regulates the design, construction, and maintenance of stormwater infrastructure. Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP), and runoff rate control for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events. A stormwater maintenance agreement and associated operations and maintenance plan is required for all private stormwater BMPs. The LMRWD requires volume control equal to one inch of runoff from impervious surfaces. The site is proposing 2.99 acres of impervious which requires 10,852 cubic feet of volume control. The filtration bench provides 16,921 cubic feet of volume control below the outlet meeting the volume control requirement. The design of the BMP is highly dependent on soil types and infiltration rates of the underlying soils. Soil borings, infiltration testing and an associated geotechnical report will be needed to confirm the design of the stormwater BMP. No geotechnical report was included as part of the reviewed submittal. If the soil borings show onsite soils are conducive to infiltration, the BMP will need to be redesigned to allow for infiltration in line with LMRWD rules. If the soil borings support the current filtration bench design, because the site is providing more volume control than is required, the project will be meeting the water quality rules. A number of comments pertaining to the P8 modeling of the site have been provided to the applicant which should be addressed to confirm the water quality treatment being provided. The Stormwater narrative and supporting hydrologic and hydraulic HydroCAD models were reviewed and found to have a few inconsistencies from the plans provided such as a different amount of proposed impervious, not properly modeling the proposed filtration bench, and not including the overflow from the pond. The current modeling shows the site meets rate control 209 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 19 requirements showing a decrease in discharge rates leaving the site from the existing condition to the proposed condition in the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm event. The applicant shall update the hydrologic and hydraulic models based on comments from City staff and provide satisfactory models, and rate analysis confirming compliance with requirements prior to recording the final plat. As noted in Appendix H of the City’s Surface Water Management Plan dated August 2006, the City requires at least three feet of freeboard between a building elevation and adjacent ponding features. The site is currently meeting this freeboard requirement with respect to the proposed BMP HWL elevation of 730.44. Once the HydroCAD models have been updated, it should be confirmed the site is still in compliance with the City’s 3-foot freeboard requirement between the HWL and adjacent buildings. The grading plan shows there is only 0.4 feet of vertical separation between the intermediate EOFs within the driving area and the adjacent buildings proposed first floor elevation. The grading plan should be updated to provide a minimum 1.0 feet of separation between these EOFs and the adjacent buildings as outlined in Chapter 19 of City Code. The City’s water resources engineer reviewed the preliminary plans provided with the submittal. Specific comments regarding the design of stormwater infrastructure and BMPs were provided to the applicant. In 2005, a Stipulation of Settlement (Court File No. 10-CV-05-48) between PCH Development, LLC and the City of Chanhassen was agreed to regarding the Park Dedication fees and Surface Water Management fees surrounding the subdivision of the “Paws Claws and Hooves Addition” subdivision (Planning Case #2003-04 and the property of this Conceptual PUD). The Surface Water Management fee was reduced to $9,900.00 and was paid on July 25, 2005. The settlement agreement states, “If all or any part of the property is changed to a different principal use or further subdivided, the property shall be subject to payment of additional park dedication and surface water management fees based upon the rates in effect at that time applicable to the proposed use and type of municipal approval requested.” However, as the stipulation was between the property owner and the City and was not required to be memorialized against the property, if the property owner changes from PCH Development, LLC no stormwater fees will be required. If the property is subdivided in the future, stormwater fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $9,900.00 already paid. UTILITIES Currently, municipal sanitary sewer and potable water services are not available to the site. During the build-out of the Highway 101 Realignment project, which was substantially completed in 2021, public sanitary sewer mains and water mains were extended along the corridor. However, these newly extended utilities are not fully active nor ready for operation to service properties, as such the site does not have adequate public sanitary and water to fully serve the development’s needs. 210 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 20 In 2014, a Highway 61 corridor study was conducted in response to several near and long-term infrastructure projects at the time (e.g. Highway 101 Realignment, CSAH 61 reconstruction, flood mitigation projects, etc.) which prompted the City to investigate the feasibility of extending public utilities to the southern portion of the City. The study, known as “County Road 61 Corridor Plan”, conducted by SRF in association with Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc., determined that utility extensions were feasible within the study area. The image below, taken from Figure 3.1 of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, depicts the City’s existing and planned sanitary sewer in this area (planned water system build-out generally adheres to the same areas and alignments). The proposed development falls within the southcentral region of sanitary subdistrict LB-1 (the Lower Bluff Creek District). The 2014 study estimated costs and fee revenue associated with extending City utilities to the study area, along with estimated utility assessments per acre, which are shown in Tables 1 and 2. 211 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 21 With a lack of adequate City utilities in the area, the development will be required to provide private utility services (sanitary sewer and potable water) to adequately meet the needs of the development. The City has agreed to allow the development to tap into the public water main which was extended with the Highway 101 Realignment project, but only to service the development’s fire suppression needs. At this time, there is not sufficient demand along the extended water main to supply water to the quality standards that the City requires for consumption. This is important to note because the preliminary plans provided indicate the existing well on-site is proposed to be abandoned. If the site will have any fixtures requiring the use of water other than for fire suppression needs, a private source of water supply must be used for those fixtures. The preliminary plans indicate a sanitary sewer main to be installed within the development that then connects to the public main extended within the CSAH 61 right-of-way. This connection is not approved as the public sanitary sewer is not active nor ready for operation to service properties. If the applicant desires to construct sanitary sewer services and/or mains to service the future needs of the development, the applicant will be required to concurrently extend the public sanitary sewer main along CSAH 61 right-of-way to the eastern property line and cap the service line to the development. The preliminary plans indicate tapping of the existing public water main for fire suppression needs at the southwest corner of the property. As shown on the preliminary plans this would be infeasible as the water main was housed in a casing at the location, and would be required to be extended further east to facilitate the connection. Regardless, the development will be required to 212 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 22 extend the 12” C900 PVC public water main to the eastern property line along CSAH 61 right- of-way. The extension into the site must be along or near the improved private access to allow for reasonable access for future repair and maintenance and of adequate diameter to service the needs of the development. Adequate public drainage and utility easements will be required over the public main as it extends into the site. Private fire laterals can then be tapped from the public main as necessary. The applicant and their engineer shall work with City staff on amending the construction plans, dated May 6, 2022 prepared by Joel G. Cooper, PE with James R. Hill, Inc., to fully satisfy staff concerns. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff to ensure adherence to the most recent edition of the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates and City Ordinances. The property and potential future properties associated with this developable area will be specially assessed for the extension of the public sanitary sewer when they connect. When the property and potential future properties connect to municipal services they will also be required to pay the utility hook-up fees at the rate in effect at the time of hook-up. Lastly, prior to commencement of any utility work, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the City which shall include but is not limited to the Minnesota Department of Health, Carver County, etc. COMPLIANCE TABLE Code Project Building Height 3 stories 1 story 35 feet 34 feet Building Setback N - 50' E - 10'N - 132' E - 75' W - 25' S - 25'W - 190' S –50’ Parking Stalls 48 stalls*5 stalls** Parking Setback N - 50' E - 10'N - 190' E - 30' W - 25' S - 25' W - 60' S - 150' Hard Surface Coverage 70%35.9% Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft.382,855 sq. ft. (8.33 ac.) *Unless applicant demonstrates that due to business model less parking is required. **Due to lack of permanent employees and no public access, staff is comfortable with provided parking. 213 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 23 Note: Listed “Code” parking setbacks can be reduced to 10 feet if 100 percent screening is provided at least five feet above the parking lot. This screening must be in the form of berms and landscaping. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve Planned Unit Development rezoning, site plan, vacation, consolidation of lots, and variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Planning: 1. Light fixtures must be downcast have a 90 degree cut off as required by Section 20-913 of the City Code. 2. Any proposed signage will require a separate sign permit and must conform to the requirements of the PUD ordinance and City Code. 3. Any future fencing will require a permit and must meet the requirements of the City Code. 4. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon consolidation of the two parcels into a single lot. 5. Retaining walls under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 6. Any future HVAC systems will need to have any and all exterior components screened from public view, either through the use of materials similar to the building materials or by using heavy landscaping that will be effective in winter. Environmental Resources: 1. The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yards. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City. 2. The applicant shall provide a 3-year prairie establishment and management plan for the native seed area specified on the landscape plan. 3. When the use of the site changes and parking is included, then all required landscaped islands and/or peninsulas shall be installed. 4. Incorporate two additional tree understory genera to Plant Schedule in order to meet minimum diversity as required by ordinance so that no genus has more than 10 trees in quantity. Fire: 1. Building must have Fire department lock boxes for access. 2. All buildings will require fire sprinkler systems. 3. If fence is added in the future it must have fire department access boxes or gate switches (if electronic). 4. No hazardous material (i.e. gasoline, oil, etc.) may be stored on site. Building: 1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 214 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 24 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. a. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Codep; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. b. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. c. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the Code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to; allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. d. Building plans must include a code analysis that contains the following information: Key Plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Exterior walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. 3. Retaining walls (if present), more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. International Building Code section 2902.1 exception: states that when approved by the building official, buildings or structures that are normally unoccupied, such as picnic shelters, amphitheaters, small transit stop stations, cold storage buildings, utility sheds, warming house, kiosks, concession stands and similar structures, need not be provided with restroom facilities. As these buildings will be used for storage and will not have employees on site, the requirement to provide a bathroom is waived and a septic system does not need to be installed. Park: 1. If the property is subdivided in the future, Park fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $2,800.00 already paid. Engineering: 1. Adequate public drainage and utility easements are required over any publicly owned and maintained water mains and will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to the recording of the final plat. 2. Any existing easements within the final plat area must be vacated prior to recording of the final plat. 3. The two parcels along the development’s eastern property lines listed with Carver County’s property information as “Parcel ID: Gap” will need to be identified appropriately prior to recording of the final plat. 4. Encroachment agreements are required of any proposed improvements within public drainage and utility easements after review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. The construction of any improvements that require access to adjacent properties shall receive a temporary construction easement or right-of-entry prior to issuance of any building permits. 215 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 25 6. Retaining walls over four feet in height shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer and shall be privately owned and maintained. 7. The development shall construct a commercial driveway access in accordance with the most recent edition of the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. 8. Any private utility needed to service the development, including sanitary sewer and potable water, will be required to be provided by the developer as the property is not serviced by adequate city utilities. 9. The proposed connection to the public sanitary sewer main is not approved. 10. The proposed water main tap to the public main shall only be used for fire suppression needs for the development. 11. The developer shall extend the 12” C900 PVC public water main to the eastern property line along CSAH 61. 12. The water extension into the site must be along or near the improved private access to allow for reasonable access for future repair and maintenance. 13. The applicant and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated May 6, 2022 prepared by Joel G. Cooper, PE, to fully satisfy all plan review comments. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff. 14. The property and potential future properties associated with the final plat will be specially assessed for the extension of the public sanitary sewer when they connect. 15. The property and potential future properties associated with the final plat will be required to pay utility hook-up charges at the rate in effect at the time of connection to municipal services. 16. All required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Health, Carver County Public, etc. shall be provided to the city prior to issuance of building permits. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of an approved permit from the LMRWD as part of the building permit submittal to the City. 2. The applicant must submit soil borings and a geotechnical report with the building permit submittal to the City. Any modifications to the current design based on the geotechnical findings will be reviewed with future submittals to confirm compliance with the City’s requirements. 3. The applicant must update the hydrologic and hydraulic models per City comments and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the building permit submittal to the City. 4. The applicant shall update P8 water quality modeling and resubmit the models in their native form to confirm the City’s water quality rule is met with the building permit submittal to the City. 5. The applicant shall update plans to provide the required freeboard from the proposed buildings and the EOF. 6. The applicant shall update plans to show wetland buffer markers and native vegetation in the wetland buffer area. 216 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 26 7. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for any proposed privately owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concurrently with the final plat. 8. If the property is subdivided in the future, stormwater fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $9,900.00 already paid. Carver County: 1. Median on CSAH 61 (Flying Could Drive) must be shifted west 60 feet to accommodate a truck and trailer pull out of the way of traffic when making left turns into the subject site. This improvement shall be made at the expense of the applicant and an excavation permit will be required. Applicant can coordinate with Carver County Public works on design specifics. A plan set shall be developed and signed by a licensed Engineer. 2. Provide drainage calculations and data for proposed development. Drainage should be carried and directed further to the east into the roadside ditch that currently exits instead of to the west side of the development on the steep slopes and directly pointed at the trail embankment. 3. Confirm that proposed drainage will not create an adverse impact to the County right of way. 4. Proposed grading shall tie-in and be compatible with the existing ground in the County right of way. 5. Outlet apron needs to be stabilized per design guidance from MnDOT to minimize the erosion risk. 6. Applicant’s engineering shall meet with Carver County Public Works to confirm the stormwater calculations. 7. Carver County will need to review and approve final grading plans. A grading permit will be required. 8. An access permit will be required for access to CSAH 61 due to the change in use and connection of the site improvements to CSAH 61. A deposit will be required to ensure work within the right of way for a median change project is to County standards. 9. Technical details of final plat, its boundaries and forms will need to be reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. 10. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility, Access, or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) for Carver County Public Works. Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits being issued. 11. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or approved conditions will need to be remedied or updated at development expense, including costs incurred by the County. ATTACHMENTS 1. Proposed PUD Ordinance 217 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD Rezoning August 16, 2022 Page 27 2. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 3. Variance Document 4. Draft Site Plan Agreement 5. Development Review Application 6. Project Narrative 7. Response to City of Chanhassen 8. Site Plan Review Set 9. Updated Landscaping Plan 10. Stormwater Narrative 11. Storm Sewer Sizing Worksheet 12. Storm Drainage Area 13. Variance Request 14. Engineering Memo 15. Carver County Memo 16. Carver County Attachment 17. Landscaping Memo 18. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g:\plan\2022 planning cases\22-04 10500 and 10520 great plains blvd rez and spa\rsi concept pud staff report.doc 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2022-04A 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance waiving Section 20-1181(b)’s required interior landscaping standards for vehicular use areas. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Paws Claws and Hooves Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, Excepting Parcel 1C and Parcel 1D as shown on Carver County Right of Way Plat No. 29, Carver County, Minnesota. And Lot 2, Block 1, Paws Claws and Hooves Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, Excepting Parcel 1A and Parcel 1B as shown on Carver County Right of Way Plat No. 29, Carver County, Minnesota. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. When the use of the site changes and parking is included, then all required landscaped islands and/or peninsulas shall be installed. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. 226 2 Dated: September 12, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 g:\plan\2022 planning cases\22-04a 10500 and 10520 great plains blvd\7-15-22 submittal for 8-16-22 pc meeting\variance document 22-04a.docx 227 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT #2022-04A RSI MARINE SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated September 12, 2022, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (the "City"), and RSI Marine & Motor Sports, LLC, (the "Developer"). 1.Request for Site Plan Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a site plan forfour single story storage buildings with a combined size of 85,200 square feet, rezoning to Planned Unit Development, vacation of existing drainage and utilities easements, consolidation of lots, and variances from the City’s vehicular area landscaping requirements (referred to in this Agreement as the "project"). The land located in Carver County, Minnesota, is legally described as: Lot 1, Block 1, Paws Claws and Hooves Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, Excepting Parcel 1C and Parcel 1D as shown on Carver County Right of Way Plat No. 29, Carver County, Minnesota. And Lot 2, Block 1, Paws Claws and Hooves Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, Excepting Parcel 1A and Parcel 1B as shown on Carver County Right of Way Plat No. 29, Carver County, Minnesota. 2.Conditions of Site Plan Approval. The City hereby approves the site plan on condition that the Developer enters into this Agreement and furnish the security required by it. 3.Development Plans. The project shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A-Site Plan prepared by James R. Hill, Inc., dated May 6, 2022. Plan B-Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plans prepared byJames R. Hill, Inc., dated May 6, 2022. Plan C-Landscaping Plan prepared byJames R. Hill, Inc., dated May 6, 2022. 228 2 Plan D - Architectural Plans prepared byGries Architectural Group Inc., dated May 6, 2022. 4.Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required screening and landscaping by September 12, 2023. The Developer mayrequest an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5.Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit from a bank, cash escrow, or equivalent ("security") for $537,875 (erosion control, grading, landscaping, and stormwater improvements). If the Developer requests a Certificate of Occupancy prior to the installation of site improvements, then the developer shall provide to the City with a letter of credit or cash escrow in an amount sufficient to insure the installation of said improvements. PROCEDURES FOR LETTER OF CREDIT REDUCTION a. Requests for reductions of Letters of Credit must be submitted to the City in writing by the Developer or his Engineer. b. Partial lien waivers totaling the amount of the requested reduction shall accompany each such request. c. Any reduction shall be subject to City approval. 6.Notices.Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer at the following address: RSI Marine. Attn: Rob Schatzle 1533 3rd Avenue W. Shakopee, MN 55379 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 7.Other Special Conditions. City Council approves a site plan for four single-story storage buildings with a combined size of 85,200 square feet, rezoning to Planned Unit Development, vacation of existing drainage and utilities easements, consolidation of lots, and variances from the City’s vehicular area landscaping requirements subject to the following conditions: Planning: 1. Light fixtures must be downcast and have a 90 degree cut off as required by Section 20- 913 of the City Code. 2. Any proposed signage will require a separate sign permit and must conform to the requirements of the PUD ordinance and City Code. 229 3 3. Any future fencing will require a permit and must meet the requirements of the City Code. 4. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon consolidation of the two parcels into a single lot. 5. Retaining walls under four feet in height require a zoning permit. 6. Any future HVAC systems will need to have any and all exterior components screened from public view, either through the use of materials similar to the building materials or by using heavy landscaping that will be effective in winter. Environmental Resources: 1. The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yards. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the City. 2. The applicant shall provide a 3-year prairie establishment and management plan for the native seed area specified on the landscape plan. 3. When the use of the site changes and parking is included, then all required landscaped islands and/or peninsulas be installed. 4. Incorporate two additional tree understory genera into Plant Schedule in order to meet minimum diversity as required by ordinance so that no genus has more than 10 trees in quantity. Fire: 1. Building must have Fire department lock boxes for access. 2. All buildings will require fire sprinkler systems. 3. If a fence is added in the future, it must have Fire department access boxes or gate switches (if electronic). 4. No hazardous material (i.e. gasoline, oil, etc.) may be stored on site. Building: 1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 1. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 2. The building is required to have automatic fire extinguishing systems. 3. Structure proximity to property lines (and other buildings) will have an impact on the Code requirements for the proposed buildings, including but not limited to: allowable size, protected openings and fire-resistive construction. These requirements will be addressed when complete building and site plans are submitted. 4. Building plans must include a Code analysis that contains the following information: Key plan, Occupancy group, Type of construction, Allowable height and area, Fire sprinklers, Separated or non-separated, Fire resistive elements (Exterior walls, Bearing walls - exterior or interior, Shaft, Incidental use), Occupant load, Exits required (Common path, Travel distance), Minimum plumbing fixture count. 3. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 230 4 4. International Building Code Section 2902.1 exception: states that when approved by the building official, buildings or structures that are normally unoccupied, such as picnic shelters, amphitheaters, small transit stop stations, cold storage buildings, utility sheds, warming house, kiosks, concession stands and similar structures, need not be provided with restroom facilities. As these buildings will be used for storage and will not have employees on site, the requirement to provide a bathroom is waived and a septic system does not need to be installed. Parks: 1. If the property is subdivided in the future, Park fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $2,800.00 already paid. Engineering: 1. Adequate public drainage and utility easements are required over any publicly owned and maintained water mains and will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to the recording of the site plan agreement. 2. Any existing easements within the area governed by the site plan agreement must be vacated prior to recording of the site plan agreement. 3. The two parcels along the development’s eastern property lines listed with Carver County’s property information as “Parcel ID: Gap” will need to be identified appropriately prior to recording of the site plan agreement. 4. Encroachment agreements are required of any proposed improvements within public drainage and utility easements after review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. The construction of any improvements that require access to adjacent properties shall receive a temporary construction easement or right-of-entry prior to issuance of any building permits. 6. Retaining walls over 4 feet in height shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer and shall be privately owned and maintained. 7. The development shall construct a commercial driveway access in accordance with the most recent edition of the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. 8. Any private utility needs to service the development, including sanitary sewer and potable water, will be required to be provided by the developer as the property is not serviced by adequate city utilities. 9. The proposed connection to the public sanitary sewer main is not approved. 10. The proposed water main tap to the public main shall only be used for fire suppression needs for the development. 11. The developer shall extend the 12” C900 PVC public watermain to the eastern property line along CSAH 61. 12. The water extension into the site must be along or near the improved private access to allow for reasonable access for future repair and maintenance. 13. The applicant and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated May 6, 2022 prepared by Joel G. Cooper, PE to fully satisfy all plan review comments. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff. 14. The property and potential future properties associated with the site plant agreement will be specially assessed for the extension of the public sanitary sewer when they connect. 15. The property and potential future properties associated with the site plan agreement will be required to pay utility hook-up charges at the rate in effect at the time of connection to municipal services. 231 5 16. All required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Health, Carver County Public, etc. shall be provided to the city prior to issuance of building permits. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of an approved permit from the LMRWD as part of the building permit submittal to the City. 2. The applicant must submit soil borings and a geotechnical report with the building permit submittal to the City. Any modifications to the current design based on the geotechnical findings will be reviewed with future submittals to confirm compliance with the City’s requirements. 3. The applicant must update the Hydrologic and Hydraulic models per City comments and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the building permit submittal to the City. 4. The applicant shall update P8 water quality modeling and resubmit the models in their native form to confirm the City’s water quality rule is met with the building permit submittal to the City. 5. The applicant shall update plans to provide the required freeboard from the proposed buildings and the EOF. 6. The applicant shall update plans to show wetland buffer markers and native vegetation in the wetland buffer area. 7. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for any proposed privately owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concurrently with the site plan agreement. 8. If the property is subdivided in the future, stormwater fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $9,900.00 already paid. Carver County: 1. Median on CSAH 61 (Flying Could Drive) must be shifted west 60 feet to accommodate a truck and trailer pull out of the way of traffic when making left turns into the subject site. This improvement shall be made at the expense of the applicant and an excavation permit will be required. Applicant can coordinate with Carver County Public works on design specifics. A plan set shall be developed and signed by a licensed Engineer. 2. Provide drainage calculations and data for proposed development. Drainage should be carried and directed further to the east into the roadside ditch that currently exits instead of to the west side of the development on the steep slopes and directly pointed at the trail embankment. 3. Confirm that proposed drainage will not create an adverse impact to the County right of way. 4. Proposed grading shall tie-in and be compatible with the existing ground in the County right of way. 5. Outlet apron needs to be stabilized per design guidance from MnDOT to minimize the erosion risk. 6. Applicant’s engineering shall meet with Carver County Public Works to confirm the stormwater calculations. 232 6 7. Carver County will need to review and approve final grading plans. A grading permit will be required. 8. An access permit will be required for access to CSAH 61 due to the change in use and connection of the site improvements to CSAH 61. A deposit will be required to ensure work within the right of way for median change project is to County standards. 9. Technical details of lot consolidation, its boundaries and forms will need to be reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. 10. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility, Access, or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) for Carver County Public Works. Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits being issued. 11. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or approved conditions will need to be remedied or updated at development expense, including costs incurred by the County. 8.General Conditions. The general conditions of this Agreement are attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein. 9.Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and by Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. __________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 233 7 DEVELOPER: BY: Its: Rob Schatzle STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________, 20___ by Rob Schatzle. __________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 234 8 ( CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL CONDITION 1.Right to Proceed. Within the site plan area, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) thissite plan agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, and 3) the City has issued a building permit in reliance on the foregoing conditions having been satisfied. 2.Maintenance of site. The site shall be maintained in accordance with the approved site plan. Plants and ground cover required as a condition of site plan approval which die shall be promptly replaced. 3.License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the site to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site plan development. 4.Erosion Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless there is full compliance with the erosion control requirements. Erosion control shall be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion control, the City will authorize removal of the erosion control measures. 5.Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 6.Warranty. All trees, grass, and sod required in the approved Landscaping Plan, Plan C, shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free at the time of planting. All trees shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or his contractor(s) shall post a letter of credit or cash escrowto the City to secure the warranties at the time of final acceptance. 7.Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made 235 9 by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from site plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. B. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Permit, including engineering and attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all development work and construction. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. 8.Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given written notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 9.Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the CityEngineer. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a certificate of occupancy unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Occupancy. Unless approved in writing by the City Engineer, no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities tested and approved by the city. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Recording. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. I. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a 236 10 waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. Construction Hours. The normal construction hours under this contract shall be from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no such activity allowed on Sundays or any recognized legal holidays. Construction activities in conjunction with new developments and city improvement projects, including but not limited to grading, utility installation and paving, requiring the use of heavy equipment shall be permitted between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on any weekday and 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No such activity is permitted on Sundays or public holidays. Operation of all internal combustion engines used for construction or dewatering purposes beyond the normal working hours will require City Council approval. K. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the site plan process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. L. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the site plan, the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1.City of Chanhassen; 2.State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3.United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4.Watershed District; 5.Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. M. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers too enter into this Development Contract. N. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. O. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. 237 11 CONSENT Owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this ____ day of _____________, 20___ By__________________________ _______________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ____________, 20___, by _________________________________. _________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P. O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 238 12 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO SITE PLAN AGREEMENT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Site Plan Agreement, agrees that the Site Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 20___. (Name and title) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by (name, title and company) . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 239 [OFFICIAL BANK LETTERHEAD] IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO:City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2______, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 15, 2______. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 15 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, ChanhassenCity Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its _____________________________ 240 [OFFICIAL BANK LETTERHEAD] 241 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Plannrng Division - 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147. Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone (952) ?27 -1100 tFax. (9521227-1110 Submrtlal Date A--oq /14 CITY OT CIIAI'IIIASSIN APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PC Date cc oate ?l (Refer lo lha approptiate Application Checklist lot rcquired sobmiftal inlomalion lhat l,r,ust accompany this application) E Comprehensive Plan Amendment. ................. E Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ! Conditional Use Permit (CUP) n Single-FamilyResidence n Att others................ E Subdivision (SUB) E Create 3 lots or less E Create over 3 lots ....... . ......( tors) ! Metes & Bounds (2 lots) E Consolidate Lots............ . ... 1<e,rOt Un ,intitrl $600 $100 $325 s425 sTso A s 100$500 as150 ns[,,|,ilhl s100 ! lnterim Use Permit (lUP) ! ln conjunction with Single-Family Residence.. $325 n A others...... .. .... .. $425 D Rezoning (REZ) El Planned Unit Development (PUD) . E Minor Amendment to existing PUD E Lot Line Ad,iustment............. .E Fr"riLt l--.. -. (lncludes $450 escrow for attorney costs). 'Additional egcrow may be requited for other applications through the developmenl contract. Vacataon of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) (Addational lecordlng fees may apply) Vanance (VAR) .. ..... Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) I Single-FamilyResidence ! Att others 5300 $200 $150 $275 $100 $500 E A[ others...... E Sign Plan Review... fl site Plan Review (SPR) tA ! Administrative .. -................ t...... (_ thousand square feet) 'lnclude number of CllSlDq employees 'lnc'lde number of 4ql4 employees E Resrdential Orstflcts..... ... .. . Plus $5 per dwelling unit (- Commercial/lndustrial Districts' ..... .. . $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet ot ouiroin! areJ--- U zoning APpeal D Zonlng Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) !qIE: When multiple appllcations are p.ocessed concur.eotly' the approp.iate fee shall be charged for each application. E Notification Sign {c,ty ro instattand remove) " $200 ! Property Owners' LiSt with in 500' lcrty to generate afler pre-app[caton meetrig) . "" '53peraddress(- addresses) ...... .......... s500 units) plv)E Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that n Conditional Use Permit E vacation I Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) lnterim Use Permit E Variance D Easements (- easements) S50 Per document fl Site Plan Agreement E Wetland Alterataon Permit a f] Deeds TOTAL FEE:t Description of Proposal: Construction ot cold siorage building and entrance otf of Flying Cloud drive with required site imProvements Property Address or Location 1 O52O GREAT PLAIN BLVD Legal Description Lot 1&2 of Paws & Hooves Addition Parcel # 8.3 3 Wetlands Present?E ves nuo Requested ZoningFringe Business District (BF)Planned Unit Development (PUD) Present Land Use Designation Commercial vacant Total Acreage. Present Zoning Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) Section 2: Required lnformation ECnecf box if separate narrative is attached Existing Use of Property ...$300 1lrclzz tl,ulr-6o.oayReviewDare qf 4 ZZ- Requested Land Use Designation:Select One 242 Section 3: Proparty Ownor and Appllcant lnformatlon APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OUIINER: ln signing this applEation, l, as applksnl represent to have obtained authonzation from the property owne, to file this application I agree to be bound by conditions of aPproval, subject ooly to the right to obiecl at the hearings on the application or during the appeal penod lf lhis application has not been slgned by the property owner, I have attaahed separaie documentation of full legal capacity to file the apdi€alion This application shoulrt-be irocesseO in my name and I am the party whorn the City should contact regarding any mattet p€rtaining to this application I will keep misetf infonned of the deadiines for submission of material and the progress ol 6is applbation l furiher untterstand th;t additional te€s may be charged tor consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authonza$on to proceed with the studi I cerlit that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correcl. Name Address' Name RSI Marine Address 1533 3rd Ave W Cityistate/Zip Emaill Shakopee rob@rsima com Sign City/State/Zip Email: Signature: PROJECT ENGINEER (if aPPlicable) James R Hill.lnc Address 2999 w county road 42 fl1OO City/Stat€r'Zp Bumsvill€. mn 55306 Email igcooper@irhinc.com . Rob Scfiatzl€ (es2) 23$2084 (612) 839-9990 5t5t22 . Joel G Coop€r (952) 89G6044 (612) s0&e$0 Contact Phone: PROPERTY OlilNER: ln signing this application, l, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this ai'plidtion. I understand thatconditions of approval are binding and agree lo be bound by those condtions, subjeit only to ih; right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will ke€P mysetf informed ot the deadtines for submission of materialind the progrestof his application. I turther understand that a(Hitional tees may be charged for consulting Ees, leasibility studies. etc. wilh an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. icertify that the information and exhibits submitted are lrue and correc't Contact Phone: Cell: Fax: Dato Cell Fax: Date Cell Fax This application must be compleled in full and musl b€ accompanied by all infonnalion and plans required by ,ootiJ[t" Cit, Ortinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appoPrbte A0d*xtion Checklist "Ii "oneryiir' tne ptanning Depaturcnt to determine the specific ordinance and applicable Procedural requiremenE and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be.made within 15 business days of applioation submittal. A ;-iti,; ;;G;;pptication oeficiencies ahall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days ot applbation. Contract Phona: Section4: Notificalion lnfotmation I Mail€d Pap€r CoPy n Maabd Paper copy fl Mailed Paper CoPY E tvtaiteo Paper copy INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICAI{T: Complete all necessary. device-TRtNrFdRM anAAelrver to city along witfi required form fields. then sebct SAVE FORH to save a copy to your docurEnts and payment SUBMIT FORM b send a digital SAVE FOR PRINT FORrrt SUBTTT FORi' ! Property Owner Vra. E Email E Appli:anl Vra: Ll Email fl Engineer Vra: Ll Email D Otre* Vra U Emdl Vlrho Bhould receive coPios of staft T.potts?'O'ift.r Cont ct lrlo E{on: Nam6: Addressl Email: Name copy to the ctty for Procesing 243 RSI MARINE BOAT STORAGE FACILITIES 1. Project Narrative. The project will consist of design and construction of (4) single story boat and watercraft storage facilities. The project is intended to be built in multiple phases, cost and utilization will determine the quantity of buildings to be built in phase 1. All buildings will be submitted for proper building permitting prior to construction. The proposed buildings are designed to maximize future flexibility. Multiple overhead doors are utilized to load and unload boats as well as allow future partitioning of the spaces. The buildings are not intended to be occupied except for loading and unloading of stored units. There are no Full-Time employees and no public access, meaning there is no need for parking on this site. 2. Project Design. a. The building exteriors are designed to be in conformance with the City of Chanhassen chapter 20, Article XXIII design requirements. Earth tone colors have been selected to blend with the natural landscape. Architectural brick tower corner elements will be utilized on the southern and west elevations to create building articulation and hold the corners of the main highway gateway district. Tower elements will have a hipped metal roof feature element. The main building utilizes color integrated CMU rock face block. Wood grain longboard lap siding and architectural insulated metal wall panels. The architectural insulated metal panel will have a stucco finish appearance. These various materials and textures create additional façade articulations. We have incorporated a two-tone color scheme to aid in breaking up the facades and avoiding monolithic exterior elevations. Color integrated overhead doors are utilized to blend with the building colors. This is in lieu of white overheads, to avoid such strong contrast i n building colors. The roof will be standing seam metal roof with color tones to match the building. We have selected a 4:12 roof pitch which was the recommended minimum pitch listed in the city guidelines. 244 3. Landscaping a. The site will be landscaped in accordance with city requirements. Additional landscape beds and groupings have been added to the south and west elevations to assist in the appearance of building articulations. b. The site usage does not necessitate the need for parking, so this helps reduc e the amount of required asphalt paving and thus reduces heat island effect. c. Foundation plantings on the outward facing building facades has been provided. 4. Retaining Wall a. Retaining wall locations and heights are indicated on civil plans. The design and engineering team anticipates on utilizing a gravity retaining wall system (Similar to RECON wall systems). All retaining walls over 4 feet will be fully engineered prior to installation. 5. Fencing and Gates a. The owner would like to maintain the option to add in security fencing and entry gates. NO gates would exceed 8 feet in height and any installed gates and fencing would be installed outside the required front yard setbacks. 6. Signs a. No building or site signage is being requested at this time. Should any signage be proposed for future use a full sign submittal package will be prepared for City review and approval. 7. Traffic Generation and Parking a. The site will have minimal traffic throughout the year. More traffic will be seen in the spring and fall as boats and watercraft are either being removed or placed into storage. There are no employees that will be working on this site and no public traffic to this site or the facilities. The site is unoccupied except for loading and unloading of the units into storage. Because of the site being unoccupied and no public access parking is not a necessity. 8. Lighting a. New exterior site and building lighting is being proposed. All new lighting will be decorative LED with housing colors to match the building materials. Please refer to submitted photometric plan for additional information. 245 9. Dumpster enclosure a. No dumpster enclosure is being proposed for the site. The buildings are unoccupied storage and site operations will not produce trash. 10. Hazardous Materials a. No Hazardous materials will be stored on-site. 11. Rooftop Equipment and Screening a. No Rooftop equipment is being proposed for the buildings. No Rooftop screening will be required as there is no rooftop equipment. Any heating for the building will be through interior Gas Fired Units or Furnaces. No AC equipment will be installed at this time. Should AC units be installed in the future they would be ground mounted and screened with landscaping. 246 RESPONSES TO CITY OF CHANHASSEN Planning: 1. The buildings must meet the requirements of Chapter 20, Article XXlll, Division 7 Design Standards for commercial, industrial, and office- institutional developments". Of particular importance: a. The south and west elevations must be articulated either through the use of facade modulation- stepping back/ forward or extending a portion of the fagade and/or vertical division using different textures or materials. Provided, refer to elevations. b. The south and west elevations must include architectural detailing to facilitate the reduction of the City' s facade transparency requirement, as outlined in section 20- 1068. Provided, refer to elevations. Tilt-up concrete panels must be grid or brick like in appearance. Provided, refer to elevations. d. Accent materials ( metal, glass block, spandrel glass, etc.) are limited to 15 percent of the building' s facade. Provided, refer to elevations Flat roofs should be defined with an ornamental parapet or cornice. Roof is sloped 4:12 which meets the requirements of the code. 2. A complete site plan application will be required concurrent with the request to rezone to Planned Unit Development ( PUD). Application has been submitted' 3. A complete variance request for the use of holding tanks will be required concurrent with the requesttorezonetoPlannedUnitDevelopment(PUD).Variancehasbeensubmitted' 4. An expanded narrative should be provided addressing the proposed use of the site. The narrative should address business model, number of employees present, parking needs, expected traffic generation and other similar elements Refer to expanded narrative 5,Proposedfenceandgateshallnotexceedeightfeetinheisht,shallbelocatedoutsideof required front yard setbacks and sight triangle if not of an open design' and shall be located behind required landscape buffers. Fencing will meet these requirements c e 5. A proposed sign plan shall be provided as part of the site plan application' We are not requesting any signage at this time. 247 8. lnformation on the heights and materials shall be provided for the proposed retaining walls. lnformation is added to civil. Full engineering drawings of retaining wall will be provided based on pla nning approval. Landscaping: 1. Must include existing trees and woods on existing conditions sheet and update the canopy coverage calculations. The trees are located on the existing conditions exhibit. a. Must meet or exceed required replacement tree planting for the site' 2. Must submit a tree inventory for the site. We have submitted a tree inventory with tree preservation 3. Staff recommends use of no- mow turf grass or prairie mix in place of the proposed sod areas to promote a sustainable landscape design for the site. We are ok with no mow tur[. 4. Must meet the buffer yard plantings as required by section 20- 7L76(tl' 5. Must include foundation plantings on the outward facing sides ofthe buildings. 6, Staff recommends that the applicant propose an alternative to the required vehicular use area landscaping requirements that meets the intent of the ordinance by providing environmental benefits and/ or reducing the heat island effect caused by large expanses of asphalt' A parking island was added. The remainder of asphalt is drive lane and does not accommodate parking islands. A variance is being applied for' Engineering: 1 Existing easements must be vacated prior to recording the final plat' The existing easements will be vacated prlor to recording final plat The existing easements have been described for the vacation' Ten- foot public drainage and utility easements will be required along all property lines' The final plat has a perimeter 10' easement for public drainage and utilities' Publicdrainageandutilityeasementswillberequiredoverpublicutilitieswithdimensions adequate to properly repair and maintain the utility( i'e water main)' The final plat has utility easements over the proposed public utilities' 2 3 7. A proposed lighting plan shall be provided as part ofthe site plan application. Lighting photometric ptan is included in the drawing package. 248 4. Status ofthe two parcels abutting the preliminary plat' s western property lines listed as Parcel lD: Gap" must be resolved prior to recording of the final plat. The property gap will be resolved. 5. Applicant must coordinate all right- of-way activity with Carver County, including considerations and conditions associated with easements for the property as well as requirements associated with ingress/ egress and construction activities such as grading and hauling operations. We will obtain Carver County permits for construction activities and ingress/egress. 5. A turnaround should be included meeting the requirements of section 20- 1122. The turnaround must facilitate the turning movement of the largest anticipated design vehicle for the site or the City' s largest fire trunk, whichever is greater. A turnaround for the fire truck is provided at the end of the drive between the buildings with a 48' radius. 7. Existing Conditions Survey: a. Topographic data 100 feet beyond the property boundary. We have added topographic to go 100 feet beyond the property line. b. lllustration of existing features that would impact the site' s ingress/ egress ( e. g. the full extents of Flying Cloud Drive which includes the median near the site' s entrance). We have included the existing improved FlyinB Cloud improvements. c. Utilities on or adjacent to the property, including location, size and invert elevation of storm sewers, catch basins and manholes; location and size of water mains (including casings) and hydrants; location of gas mains, high pressure lines, fire hydrants, electric and telephone lines, and street liShts. The direction, distance to, and size of such facilities shall be indicated. We have added the adjacent utilities with rims and inverts. d. Sewage treatment systems and associated conveyance systems The existing sanitary sewer has been added e. Existing easements and associated recording document numbers' Existing easements have been included f. Property information within 150 feet of the property' s boundary' We have added adjacent property information within l'50 feet of the boundary' g. Retaining wall elevations. The existing retaining walls are shown h. Show buffer and wetland setbacks for managed type 2 wetland' We are not aware of any wetlands on the property' 8. Retaining walls over four feet in height require an engineered design' A structural engineer will design all retaining walls over 4 feet 9. Retaining walls in easements will require Encroachment Agreements and if any construction or impacts require access to abutting properties, the appropriate right- of-entry agreements and/ or temporary construction easements must be obtained' The retaining walls within the 10'drainage and utility easements will require an EncroachmentASreement.ThewallswillbeconstructedwithoutencroachinSuntoadjacent properties. 249 Water Resources: 1. A permit from the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District( LMRWD) will be required. Staff believes the proposed stormwater will tri8ger LMRWD Rule D. A permit from the Lower Minnesota River Watershed will be obtained prior to construction. 2. Verify with LMRWD if the project will trigger Rule F- Steep Slopes' The site is not located within a steep slope per Lower Minnesota River watershed District maps. 3. Must address water Resources Engineer' s (wRE) comments on stormwater design transmitted via email dated February 4, 2022. a.H&Hmodelsshouldbeupdatedperthesecommentspriortositeplansubmittal. ThestormwaterdesignaddressestherequirementsoftheLowerMinnesotaRiVer WatershedRuleD.andthecity,sstormwaterrequirements.Wehaveincludedthe HydroCAD and P8 models for review for water quality and quantity requirements' 10. No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is developed. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements as listed in Parts lll and lV of the permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub- contractors are identified and as other conditions change. We will develop a standalone SWPPP and will have a NDPES permit in place prior to any earth moving activitles. 11. The city has preliminarily agreed to allow the development to tap into the public water main which was extended with the Highway 101 Realignment project, but only to service the development' s fire suppression needs. It is understood that the on-site watermain is for fire suppression only and not for domestic use. The site is intended to be utilized for cold storage with no permanent on-site personnel. 12. lf thesitewill have anyfixtures requiringthe use of water other than for fire suppression needs, a private source of water supply must be used for those fixtures. There will be no on-site water usage with the current plan. 13. Water Connection fees will be due at the time potable water is available to the site and will be at the rates in effect at that time. It is understood that the water fees will be paid when portable water is available to the site. 14. The property and potential future properties associated with this developable area will be specially assessed for the extension of the public sanitary sewer when they connect. It is understood there will be connection fees for sanitary sewer when the public sanitary sewer becomes f unctional. 15. The development will be required to extend the public water main to the western property line, and the extension into the site must be along or near the improved private access to allow for reasonable access for future repair and maintenance. The water main has been extended through the property to the eastern property line for future extension of the water system. 250 4. Buildings and parking areas must meet required wetland setbacks. We are not aware of any wetlands onsite. 5. Geotechnical report and infiltration testing to show sequencing of BMP design from infiltration to filtration will likely be required prior to the issuance of building permit. The Geotechnical lnvestigation has been ordered and will be provided when available, the timeline for this is 3 to 4 weeks from today's date. 5. HydroCAD models should be submitted in addition to reports for review by the WRE. The HydroCAD model and P8 model have been submitted for review 7. Stormwater facilities must meet the requirements of section 19- 144 of the City Code. It is our opinion that the stormwater facilities designed for this project are in compliance with the requirements of section 19-144 of the City Code. 8. A stormwater maintenance agreement and associated operations and maintenance plan is required for all private stormwater BMPs. A stormwater maintenance agreement, operations and maintenance plan will be provided. g. lf the property is subdivided in the future, stormwater fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $9, 900.00 already paid U nderstood Pa rk: 1. lf the property is subdivided in the future, Park fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the S 2,800.00 already paid. 1. All buildings will require fire sprinkler systems. Buildings will be sprinkled' 2. All buildingswill needafirepanel (oronecentral location panel) to monitorthe fire sprinkler systems. Fire panel will be provided. 3.Firehydrant(s}willberequired.currentlyshowingonpreliminaryutilityplan.HydrantWilIbe provided, refer to plans for locations' 4. Fire access roads/ driveway grading not to exceed 10% in grade Truck turn around was added with appropriate grades. Access to back of buildings is under 350' Fire: 251 MATERIAL INDEX-PLANS,SECTIONS STONE FINISHED LUMBER ROUGH LUMBER PLYWOOD POURED CONCRETE CONCRETE BLOCK FILLED CONCRETE BLOCK FACE BRICK GRAVEL FILL CERAMIC TILE COMPACTED FILL EARTH CONSTRUCT NEW WALL EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED BITUMINOUS PAVING ACOUSTIC TILE PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWALL STEEL RIGID INSULATION BATT INSULATION WALL TYPEA1 SECTION CUT SYMBOL (WALL SECTIONS) PLAN DETAIL / ENLARGED PLAN SYMBOL DETAIL CUT SYMBOL REFERENCE SYMBOLS DRAWING SYMBOLS SECTION DESIGNATION (NUMBER FOR CROSS SECTION & LETTER FOR WALL SECTION) DRAWING NUMBER ON WHICH DETAIL APPEARS WINDOW TAG REVISION NUMBER DOOR TAG DRAWING NUMBER ON WHICH SECTION APPEARS DRAWING NUMBER ON WHICH DETAIL APPEARS DETAIL NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER ELEVATION MARK - EXISTING ELEVATION MARK - NEW STAIRWAY DIRECTION INDICATION COLUMN LINE DESIGNATION- NEW0 1 A101 1 A101 1 A101 101 1 W1 UP Name Elevation Name Elevation KEYNOTE MARK - ACCESSORIES KEYNOTE MARK - DEMOLITION NOTES 10'-0" A.F.F.SPOT ELEVATION MARKER ? ? ?KEYNOTE MARK - PLAN NOTES PROJECT DATA GOVERNING AUTHORITY - CITY OF CHANHASSEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CLASS OF CONSTRUCTION III-B OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION MODERATE-HAZARD STORAGE (S-1) LOCAL ZONING AUTHORITY CITY OF CHANHASSEN BUILDING SPRINKLED YES INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2015REFERENCED CODE BUILDING AREA: BUILDING A: BUILDING B: BUILDING C: BUILDING D: TOTAL BUILDING SQ. FT.: 20,225 S.F. 22,848 S.F. 22,848 S.F. 86,146 S.F. 20,225 S.F. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 0 Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request. ©Copyright. This Print/Computer File Gries Architectural Group, Inc. Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying Or Is The Exclusive Property Of date: job: d. by: rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 3:31:37 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtC-S ZTS 05-06-2022 22-054 ---A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTANOTE: ALL TRADES SHALL CROSS REFERENCE ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR COORDINATION AND SCOPE OF WORK. VICINITY PLAN INDICATES PROJECT LOCATION NO SCALE NOTE: THE INTENT AND MEANING OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS THAT THE CONTRACTOR UNDER THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT SHALL TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY AND REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES WHICH ARE INDICATED OR REASONABLY IMPLIED BY EACH DRAWING AND EACH SECTION OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, ALL OF WHICH ARE COLLECTIVELY NECESSARY AND REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DESCRIBED STRUCTURES AND FACILITIES. A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR: RSI MARINE STORAGE CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SHEET INDEX 10520 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA C-S COVER SHEET CIVIL C-1.0 TITLE SHEET C-1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C-1.2 EXISTING/PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP C-1.3 SITE PLAN C-1.4 FUTURE SITE PLAN C-2.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT C-3.0 PRELIMINARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN C-3.1 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C-3.2 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C-3.3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C-4.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C-5.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN C-6.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN C-6.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL A-0.1 SITE PLAN PH-1 LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC A-1.1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A-1.2 BUILDING A - FLOOR PLAN A-1.3 BUILDING B - FLOOR PLAN A-1.4 BUILDING C - FLOOR PLAN A-1.5 BUILDING D - FLOOR PLAN A-3.1 DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULE A-4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-4.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-4.3 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-4.4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-11.1 RENDERINGS PROJECT LOCATION ARCHITECTURAL GRIES ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, INC. 500 N. COMMERCIAL STREET NEENAH, WI 54956 PH (920)722-2445 FX (920)722-6605 CONTACT: BRANNIN GRIES, AIA CIVIL JAMES R. HILL, INC. 2999 WEST COUNTY ROAD 42 SUITE #100 BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55306 PH (952) 980-6044 FX (952) 890-6244 CONTACT: JOEL COOPER, PE OWNER RSI MARINE 1533 WEST 3RD AVENUE SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 PH (952) 233-2084 CONTACT: ROB SCHATZLE CONSULTANTS 252 SB-1 llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll∅ ∅ ∅ ∅ ∅ ∅ ∅ ∅ 253 SB-1 254 255 256 257 POINT #NORTHING EASTING DESCRIPTION 284 163489.1035 559006.6578 19 Siberian Elm 2064 163328.4604 559720.9838 10 Box Elder 2109 163647.6438 559266.113 10 Siberian Elm 2110 163682.2953 559333.0147 10 Siberian Elm 2111 163697.7671 559340.1056 10 Box Elder 2112 163704.4823 559353.4803 10 Siberian Elm 2113 163693.4111 559360.3703 10 Siberian Elm 2114 163686.814 559370.5764 13,8 Siberian Elm 2116 163725.1427 559458.4853 25,18 Hackberry 2117 163727.2418 559493.5026 16 Siberian Elm 2121 163781.9982 559676.3746 18,13,9 Hackberry 2122 163774.6774 559674.5879 13,12 Hackberry 2130 163527.6634 559760.2088 19 Box Elder 2131 163483.3705 559758.9706 10 Box Elder 2177 163518.8967 559089.5044 22,20,20 Siberian Elm 2178 163509.981 559096.7367 21 American Elm 2179 163506.6533 559101.5044 17 Siberian Elm 2180 163504.632 559072.3306 20 Siberian Elm 2181 163526.3029 559058.5652 18 Siberian Elm 2182 163501.5306 559047.3181 28,21,16 Siberian Elm 2183 163489.734 559038.2306 17 Siberian Elm 2185 163479.4641 559000.124 26 Siberian Elm 2186 163481.1005 558998.3376 16 Siberian Elm 2187 163493.3669 558977.9876 13 Siberian Elm 2188 163572.0269 558991.8681 16 Siberian Elm 2189 163588.0816 559009.0521 22,21 Siberian Elm POINT #NORTHING EASTING DESCRIPTION 2063 163355.6178 559746.9207 10 Box Elder 2065 163195.2848 559225.6137 10 American Elm 2066 163180.7281 559208.1095 10 American Elm 2067 163271.0412 559253.8932 11 Box Elder 2068 163275.5904 559250.5129 13 Box Elder 2069 163227.3123 559337.0193 10 Box Elder 2070 163241.7047 559335.3185 13 Box Elder 2071 163273.6354 559228.7358 18 Box Elder 2072 163262.9868 559215.0596 18,8 Box Elder 2073 163261.0065 559204.9461 10,10 Box Elder 2074 163267.056 559185.3021 18,15 Box Elder 2075 163256.8953 559187.1263 12 Box Elder 2076 163271.1905 559126.6369 23,23 Box Elder 2077 163241.0974 559128.465 14 Willow 2078 163279.0527 559194.0803 13 Norway Spruce 2079 163276.7633 559219.0094 16 Norway Spruce 2080 163279.8066 559235.2374 14 Norway Spruce 2081 163273.3716 559357.7188 24 Cottonwood 2082 163286.8736 559391.4575 20 Willow 2083 163287.4293 559393.5576 10 Willow 2084 163284.6757 559395.5776 15 Willow 2085 163282.6964 559396.3653 11 Willow 2086 163280.2335 559414.7902 24,19 Willow 2087 163275.4887 559404.0825 10 Willow 2088 163284.0832 559417.8545 10 Box Elder 2089 163284.8677 559422.2367 18 Willow 2090 163462.3939 559529.1046 22 Cottonwood 2091 163463.636 559528.1997 16 Willow 2092 163451.283 559527.5783 22 Cottonwood 2093 163454.5051 559426.4161 10,10 Siberian Elm 2094 163416.2834 559332.9672 15 Cottonwood 2095 163419.1856 559333.1512 13 Cottonwood 2096 163389.5354 559314.7313 10,10,9,9,8 Willow 2097 163510.5306 559288.2999 23,16 Siberian Elm 2098 163526.1398 559295.9915 23,16,11 Siberian Elm 2099 163542.3688 559217.9215 20 Hackberry 2100 163524.6972 559183.2516 33 Siberian Elm 2101 163520.6585 559168.6191 12 Siberian Elm 2102 163565.3894 559226.8401 18,11,11 Siberian Elm 2103 163592.2276 559257.2537 10 Siberian Elm 2104 163597.5324 559300.3117 11 Siberian Elm 2105 163602.3112 559320.8347 12 Siberian Elm 2106 163582.9878 559329.5233 22 Siberian Elm 2107 163645.4854 559330.2428 11 Siberian Elm 2108 163636.1626 559298.9266 10 Siberian Elm 2115 163664.2324 559394.1403 16 Siberian Elm 2118 163723.9662 559504.2211 16 Siberian Elm 2119 163727.9508 559514.5144 16 Siberian Elm 2120 163760.8477 559632.8094 18 Hackberry 2123 163549.6972 559718.6603 12 Box Elder 2124 163542.1207 559725.5924 14 Box Elder 2125 163536.5738 559715.3178 17 Box Elder 2126 163524.4259 559703.9858 21 Box Elder 2127 163507.9459 559708.308 26,13 Box Elder 2128 163505.3951 559701.7135 16 Box Elder 2129 163529.6273 559749.4411 21 Box Elder 2132 163475.986 559750.4401 17 Box Elder 2133 163475.3578 559739.3023 24 Box Elder 2134 163475.2682 559699.2584 17 Box Elder 2135 163481.3072 559674.6335 22 Box Elder 2136 163499.545 559650.6506 14 Siberian Elm 2137 163464.0451 559655.1968 10 Box Elder 2138 163453.0323 559642.9052 11 Box Elder 2139 163444.5842 559650.9688 16 Box Elder 2140 163446.1682 559645.4912 19 Box Elder 2141 163437.6525 559629.3954 12 Box Elder 2142 163423.7391 559626.0053 17 Box Elder 2143 163420.4737 559631.8478 10 Box Elder 2144 163424.4989 559609.5923 11 Box Elder 2145 163429.5294 559588.2944 11,10,8,7 Willow 2146 163402.2477 559623.2356 16 Box Elder 2147 163398.4829 559631.1674 14 Box Elder 2148 163394.0157 559625.397 11 Box Elder 2149 163414.2903 559637.8216 10 Box Elder 2150 163393.2333 559662.8366 21 Hackberry 2151 163362.0785 559672.7099 11 Green Ash 2152 163356.6224 559660.664 18 Green Ash 2153 163358.3436 559687.7352 12 Apple 2154 163390.0879 559687.5186 18,17 Green Ash 2155 163398.6755 559701.5773 12 Box Elder 2156 163405.54 559709.5845 19 Box Elder 2157 163410.3257 559719.3798 17 American Elm 2158 163409.8838 559719.8286 10 American Elm 2159 163409.3412 559716.1495 17 Box Elder 2160 163435.7328 559683.3349 12 Box Elder 2161 163442.5314 559725.2941 23 Box Elder 2162 163468.3259 559724.804 20 Box Elder 2163 163427.3785 559738.5248 20 American Elm 2164 163414.7486 559744.3545 16 Box Elder 2165 163404.2404 559728.2712 19 Box Elder 2166 163413.3113 559752.3512 27 Box Elder 2167 163355.6654 559685.0331 16 Box Elder 2168 163336.8508 559678.7985 12 Red Cedar 2169 163336.7448 559675.9334 10 Red Cedar 2170 163339.3436 559636.4676 22 Siberian Elm 2171 163331.9105 559624.7012 10 Box Elder 2172 163336.0342 559620.981 11 Red Cedar 2173 163315.0956 559619.9223 11 Box Elder 2174 163323.759 559614.341 10 Box Elder 2175 163319.3361 559595.6051 10 Box Elder 2176 163553.0233 559139.7664 14 Siberian Elm 258 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTHEASTLINE OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, PAWS CLAWS ANDHOOVES ADDITION WHICH IS ASSUMED TOHAVE A BEARING OF S 71°41'29" W.DENOTES FOUND OPEN 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENTDENOTES SET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENTWITH CAP MARKED R.L.S. NO. 47481DENOTES FOUND JUDICIAL LANDMARKERDENOTES FOUND RIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTDENOTES CARVER COUNTY MONUMENTDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BEING10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISEINDICATED, ADJOINING LOT LINES, ANDBEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED, ADJOINING RIGHTOF WAY LINES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT.DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSARE SHOWN THUS:VICINITY MAPDRAWN BYDATEREVISIONSPL011CAD FILESS.GZJPROJECT NO.SHEET 1 OF 1PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONRSI MARINE ST. 0ICHAEL 0INNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT FORPCH Development, LLC  WEST C.R.  S8ITE 1 B8RNSVILLE 0N  PHONE .. PKDPSWRQ#MUKLQF.FRP PLANNERS  EN*INEERS  S8RVEYORS ZZZ.MUKLQF.FRP James R. Hill, Inc.Lot 1, BLock 1, PAWS CLAWS AND HOOVES ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota,Excepting Parcel 1C and Parcel 1D as shown on CARVER COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLATNO. 29, Carver County, Minnesota.andLot 2, BLock 1, PAWS CLAWS AND HOOVES ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota,Excepting Parcel 1A and Parcel 1B as shown on CARVER COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLATNO. 29, Carver County, Minnesota.259 SB-1 llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll260 ESTIMATED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL QUANTITIES RSI MARINE - CHANHASSEN, MN TYPE OF PROJECT: COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TYPE OF WORK: Mass Grading, Utility and Street Construction, Paving. Subsequently, Joint Trench and Home construction will occur. TOTAL PLATTED AREA: 8.33 AC TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 6.55 AC PROPOSED (DESIGN) IMPERVIOUS AREA:2.99 AC SPECIAL WATERS: The site is NOT within a 1-mile radius of a special or impaired water. CONSTRUCTION PHASING The project is expected to be constructed in three phases, with mass grading occurring during one construction season. Mass grading is anticipated to be completed within 4 weeks from commencement of work. Utility and street construction is anticipated to be completed within 4 weeks from commencement of work. POTENTIONAL FOR EROSION AND DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT As the site will be stripped of topsoil and vegetation for a period of several weeks during construction, the potential for erosion will increase. The overall gradients on the site are relatively low. The street subcut will serve as temporary sediment basins during construction. The project is primarily cut, and therefore perimeter erosion will flow inward towards the project. The risk of discharge of sediment off of the site is low, due to the grade orientation and design. The highest potential for discharge off the site is from the street entrance. Contractor will be required to manage completion of 3:1 slopes such that soil exposure is minimized. After excavation and embankments are completed, slopes shall be re-spread with topsoil, the slope grades certified, and erosion blanket installed as per the plan. Contractor shall coordinate these steps to be carried out in a timely manner. EROSION CONTROL BMPs The construction plans anticipate the use of, but are not limited to, the following Erosion Control BMPs: 1.Perimeter delineation to minimize disturbed areas 2.Temporary Rock Construction Entrance 3.Temporary straw mulch as needed. 4.Seed and mulch/sod 5.Erosion Control Blanket 6.Minimize active or disturbed work areas 7.Horizontal slope grading 8.Turf Reinforcement Mat SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs The construction plans anticipate the use of, but are not limited to, the following Sediment Control BMPs 1.Sediment traps constructed in street subcut 2.Rock filter dikes in street subcut 3.Utilize permanent stormwater basin as Temporary Sediment Basin 4.Silt Fence at project perimeter or toe of slopes 5.Inlet protection on existing catch basins 6.Inlet protection on existing culverts 7.Inlet protection after utility construction 8.Linear control along back of new curb and gutter (sod, bioroll, or silt fence) 9.Routine street sweeping adjacent to construction entrance. 10.Ditch checks Refer to plans for designated locations of BMPs, details and implementation notes. BASIN AND TRAP DEWATERING BMPs Should the need arise for basin or trap dewatering, contractor shall utilize a floating skimmer pump intake, such that the water is drawn from the surface of the basin. Pumped effluent shall not be discharged into Surface Waters in a turbid state. Turbid effluent shall be filtered with mechanical devices, chemical filtering, or a combination thereof, to a state of 50 NTUs or less. STABILZATION BMPs The construction plans anticipate the use of, but are not limited to, the following Stabilization BMPs: 1.After lot pads are grade certified, permanent seed and mulch can be applied, generally from the front of the building pad, extending to the rear of the lot (areas where no further utility construction is anticipated.) 2.After 3:1 slopes on lots are certified, permanent seed and erosion control blanket can be applied. 3.Rip rap at pipe outfalls 4.Permanent seed and erosion control blanket on basin slopes after grade certified. 5.After curbs are backfilled, apply permanent seed and mulch to remaining building pads and boulevard area not already stabilized. 6.Sod placement, as appropriate. POLLUTION CONTROL BMPs 1.Fueling: A fixed fueling station is not anticipated. Contractor will be required to implement BMPs for onsite re-fueling of equipment. 2.Concrete Washout: A suggested washout area will be specified on the plan. The developer has the ability to adjust location or to provide alternative washout containment. 3.There is not an anticipated need for storing chemicals, paints, solvents or other potentially toxic or hazardous materials on site. SEED & MULCH SPECIFICATIONS Seed placed for permanent cover or final stabilization requires 6” minimum topsoil cover. Exception: Infiltration basins - see basin details for soil type). Multiple site visits will be required to accommodate permanent or temporary stabilization as required during the phases of construction. (1) General Seed & Mulch A.Seed: MNDOT 25-141 at a rate of 59 lb/acre B.Fertilzer: Type 3 slow release 10-10-10 at a rate of 200 lb/acre C.Mulch: MNDOT Type 1 at a rate of 2 tons/acre (2)Temporary Cover Crop (Ponding/Infiltration/Adjacent Slope Areas) A.Seed: MNDOT 21-112 at a rate of 100 lb/acre B.Fertilzer: Type 3 slow release 10-10-10 at a rate of 200 lb/acre C.Mulch: MNDOT Type 3 at a rate of 2 tons/acre (3)Hydro-Seeding (Stockpile) A.Seed: MNDOT 22-111 Seed & Type Hydraulic Mulch at a rate of 10 lb/1000 gal B.Fertilzer: Type 3 slow release 10-10-10 at a rate of 50 lb/1000 gal C.Mulch: Type Hydraulic Mulch at a rate of 350 lb/1000 gal D.Water: 875 gal/1000 gal E.Apply at 6000 gal of Slurry per acre (4) Stormwater Basins (Aquatic Bench up to HWL) A.Seed: MNDOT 33-261 at a rate of 14.5 lb/acre B.Fertilzer: Type 3 slow release 10-10-10 at a rate of 200 lb/acre C.Mulch: MNDOT Type 3 at a rate of 2 tons/acre INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPs Routine Inspection 1.Rock Entrance - Inspect weekly. If rock becomes filled with sediment and tracked material to the extent the purpose ceases to function, remove the contaminated rock and replace with new rock. 2.Silt fence - Inspect weekly, particularly for damaged sections, breaches, down-gradient areas, flow concentration points, scour areas and sections adjacent to sensitive areas. Where capacity is filled to more than 50% of depth, sediment shall be removed to restore capture capacity. 3.Sediment traps and basins - Inspect weekly. Where capacity is filled to more than 50% of depth, sediment shall be removed to restore capture capacity within 72 hours of discovery. 4.Inlet Protection - Inspect weekly or more frequently as needed after multiple rainfalls less than 0.5”. Verify intake capacity is not compromised. Where capacity is filled to more than 50% of depth, sediment shall be removed to restore capture capacity. 5.Inspect other site specific BMP's on a weekly basis minimum. Rain Event Inspection - Mandatory, within 24 hours after a rain event 0.5” or greater. Complete all items associated with Routine Inspection. Furthermore, inspect site for breaches, failures, scours and gullying. Take corrective actions as necessary to restore functionality to the BMP's. If a given situation is discovered to be prone to repetitive failure, advise the Engineer and Contractor for SWPPP and BMP amendments. ADDITIONAL SWPPP NOTES 1.All Erosion and Sediment Control facilities shall be maintained by the contractor during the construction operations. Any temporary facilities which are to be removed as called for on these plans and specifications shall be removed by the contractor at the time directed by the engineer. The contractor shall then restore the subsequently disturbed areas in accordance with these plans and specifications. 2.Wherever practical and feasible, the contractor shall protect and preserve existing natural trees, grass and other vegetative cover in effort to provide natural buffering and filtering of runoff. 3.Contractor shall be adaptable in adjusting construction schedules in anticipation of weather forecasts of precipitation, in order to minimize risk of erosion and sediment transport. 4.It is the responsibility of the contractor to keep public streets, travel ways, parking lots and trails utilized for ingress to and egress from the construction site free of dirt, sediment and debris, resulting from construction activity. Cost for this shall be considered incidental to the contract. 5.Adequate control of dust shall be maintained by the contractor. Cost for dust control shall be considered incidental to the contract. ADDITIONAL SWPPP NOTES (continued) 6. Perimeter controls shall not be removed until final stabilization of areas draining toward the control devices. 7. When temperatures do not exceed 40 degrees F, areas that require seed and mulch stabilization shall be dormant seeded. Application rate shall be two times the normal rate. No dormant seeding shall be done on ice or snow greater than 2” in depth. 8. Any areas that were seeded that do not achieve 70% coverage shall be reseeded at the contractor's expense, where coverage limitation is caused by lack of seed germination and growth. MPCA STORMWATER PERMIT - RESPONSIBILITY The Contractor will be required to become the Permittee for the project, until final stabilization and transfer of responsibility is completed. Transfer of responsibility shall be completed with the Permit Modification Form. OWNER: ROB SCHATZLE - RSI MARINE - 952-233-2084 PERMITTEE: TBD OPERATOR(S): TBD OTHER CONTACTS ENGINEER: JOEL G. COOPER, P.E., - James R. Hill, Inc. - 952-890-6044 TRAINING REQUIREMENTS JOEL G. COOPER, P.E. DESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPP (CERTIFICATION(2020-2023)) UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN LGU CONTACT: CHARLES HOWLEY - CHANHASSEN - 652-227-1169 MPCA COMPLIANCE: JOSH NORMAN - MPCA - 651-757-2389 The Contractor shall follow the implementation sequence as described on these plans. Amendments shall be made as site conditions change. Amendments shall be proposed by contractor and reviewed by the engineer. All BMP's selected and implemented shall be appropriate for the time of year, the current site conditions and for the estimated duration of use. These plans shall be considered part of the project SWPPP. A copy of the SWPPP shall remain on site throughout active construction. 261 1.1 Permit Coverage. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.2 This permit is required for construction activity that results in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one (1) acre or if a project is part of a common plan of development or sale that ultimately will disturb greater than one (1) acre, and authorizes, subject to the terms and conditions of this permit, the discharge of stormwater associated with construction activity. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.3 Construction activity covered by this permit cannot commence until coverage under this permit is effective as described in item 3.3 through 3.4 or, if applicable, until the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has issued an individual National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/State Disposal System (SDS) construction stormwater permit for the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.4 This permit covers all areas of the State of Minnesota except land wholly within the boundaries of a federally recognized Indian Reservation owned by a tribe or a tribal member or land held in trust by the federal government for a tribe or tribal member. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.5 Coverage under this permit is not required when all stormwater from construction activity is routed directly to and treated by a "treatment works," as defined in Minn. Stat. Sect. 115.01, subd. 21, operated under an individual NPDES/SDS permit with a Total Suspended Solids (TSS) effluent limit. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.6 This permit covers ongoing projects covered under any previous construction stormwater permit that are not complete on the issuance date of this permit. Permittees must either remain in compliance with the previous permit and terminate coverage within 18 months of the issuance date of this permit or comply with this permit, including updating the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), within the 18- month period. Permittees of previously permitted projects are not required to incorporate any additional requirements regarding the permanent stormwater treatment system included in this reissued permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 1.7 Coverage for projects that extend beyond the expiration date of this permit remains effective for a grace period covering project completion and Notice of Termination (NOT) submittal. If Permittees cannot complete projects during the grace period, the MPCA will extend coverage under the next permit and permittees must comply with the requirements of the new permit including updating the SWPPP. Permittees are not required to follow changes to the permanent stormwater treatment section of the next permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.1 Prohibitions and Limitations of Coverage. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.2 The owner must develop a complete and accurate SWPPP that complies with item 5.2 prior to submitting the application for coverage and starting construction activity. Failure to prepare a SWPPP prior to submitting the application may result in permit revocation. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.3 This permit prohibits discharges of any material other than stormwater treated in compliance with this permit and discharges from dewatering or basin draining activities in accordance with Section 10. Prohibited discharges include, but are not limited to, wastewater from washout of concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials, fuels, oils, or other pollutants used in vehicle and equipment operation and maintenance, soaps or solvents used in vehicle and equipment washing and maintenance, and other hazardous substances or wastes. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.4 This permit does not authorize stormwater discharges related to the placement of fill into waters of the state requiring local, state or federal authorizations (such as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters Work permits or local governmental unit (LGU) Wetland Conservation Act replacement plans or determinations). [Minn. R. 7090] 2.5 This permit does not authorize stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity except for construction activity. Permittees must obtain coverage for discharges associated with industrial activity under a separate NPDES/SDS permit once day-to-day operational activities commence even if construction is ongoing. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.6 This permit does not authorize discharges from non-point source agricultural and silvicultural activities excluded from NPDES permit requirements under 40 CFR pt. 122.3(e). [Minn. R. 7090] 2.7 This permit does not authorize stormwater discharges to Prohibited, Restricted, Special or Impaired waters unless permittees follow the additional stormwater requirements in Section 23. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.8 This permit does not replace or satisfy any environmental review requirements including those under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act or the National Environmental Policy Act. The owner must verify completion of any environmental review required by law, including any required Environmental Assessment Work Sheets or Environmental Impact Statements, Federal environmental review, or other required review prior to applying for coverage under this permit. If any part of your common plan of development or sale requires environmental review, coverage under this permit cannot be obtained until such environmental review is complete. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.9 This permit does not replace or satisfy any review requirements for discharges adversely impacting State or Federally designated endangered or threatened species or a designated critical habitat. The owner must comply with the National Historic Preservation Act and conduct all required review and coordination related to historic preservation, including significant anthropological sites and any burial sites, with the Minnesota Historic Preservation Officer. [Minn. R. 7090] 2.10 This permit does not authorize discharges to wetlands unless the permittee complies with the requirements in Section 22. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.1 Application and Coverage Effective Date. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.2 The owner and operator must submit a complete and accurate on-line application with the appropriate fee to the MPCA for each project that disturbs one (1) or more acres of land or for a common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one (1) or more acres. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.3 For projects or common plans of development or sale that disturb less than 50 acres or do not discharge stormwater within 1 mile (aerial radius measurement) of a special or impaired water, permittees do not need to submit the SWPPP with the application. Permit coverage for these projects is effective upon application and completing the payment process. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.4 For certain projects or common plans of development or sale disturbing 50 acres or more, the complete SWPPP must be included with the application and submitted at least 30 days before the start of construction activity. This applies if there is a discharge point on the project within one mile (aerial radius measurement) of, and flows to, a special water listed in item 23.3 through 23.6 or an impaired water as described in item 23.7. Permit coverage for these projects is effective upon submitting the application and complete SWPPP, completing the payment process and receiving a determination from the MPCA that the review of the SWPPP is complete. The determination may take longer than 30 days if the SWPPP is incomplete. If the MPCA fails to contact the permittees within 30 days of application receipt, coverage is effective 30 days after completing the payment process. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.5 The application requires listing all persons meeting the definition of owner and operator as permittees. The owner is responsible for compliance with all terms and conditions of this permit. The operator is responsible for compliance with Sections 3, 4, 6-22, 24 and applicable requirements for construction activity in Section 23. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.6 Permittees will receive coverage notification in a manner determined by the MPCA. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.7 For construction projects where the owner or operator changes (e.g., an original developer sells portions of the property to various homebuilders or sells the entire site to a new owner), the current owner and the new owner or operator must submit a complete permit modification form provided by the MPCA. The current owner and the new owner or operator must submit the form prior to the new owner or operator commencing construction activity or no later than 30 days after taking ownership of the property. [Minn. R. 7090] 3.8 For construction projects where the owner or operator changes, the current owner must provide a SWPPP to the new owner and operator that specifically addresses the remaining construction activity. The new owner or operator can implement the original SWPPP, modify the SWPPP, or develop a new SWPPP. Permittees must ensure their activities do not render another party's erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs ineffective. [Minn. R. 7090] 4.1 Termination of Coverage. [Minn. R. 7090] 4.2 Permittees must submit a NOT within 30 days after all termination conditions listed in Section 13 are complete. [Minn. R. 7090] 4.3 Permittees must submit a NOT within 30 days after selling or otherwise legally transferring the entire site, including permit responsibility for roads (e.g., street sweeping) and stormwater infrastructure final clean out, or transferring portions of a site to another party. The permittees' coverage under this permit terminates at midnight on the submission date of the NOT. [Minn. R. 7090] 4.4 Permittees may terminate permit coverage prior to completion of all construction activity if they meet all of the following conditions: a. construction activity has ceased for at least 90 days; and b. at least 90 percent (by area) of all originally proposed construction activity has been completed and permanent cover has been established on those areas; and c. on areas where construction activity is not complete, permanent cover has been established; and d. the site complies with item 13.3 through 13.7. After permit coverage is terminated under this item, any subsequent development on the remaining portions of the site will require permit coverage if the subsequent development itself or as part of the remaining common plan of development or sale will result in land disturbing activities of one (1) or more acres in size. [Minn. R. 7090] 4.5 Permittees may terminate coverage upon MPCA approval after submitting information documenting the owner cancelled the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.1 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Content. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.2 The owner must develop a SWPPP. The SWPPP must include items 5.3 through 5.26. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.3 The SWPPP must incorporate specific Best Management Practices (BMP) used to comply with the requirements of this permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.4 The SWPPP must include a narrative describing the timing for installation of all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs and a description of the permanent stormwater treatment systems. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.5 The SWPPP must include the location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs along with procedures used to establish additional temporary BMPs as necessary for the site conditions during construction. Standard details and/or specifications for BMPs must be included in the final plans and specifications for the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.6 The SWPPP must include the calculations and other information used for the design of temporary sediment basins and any of the permanent stormwater treatment systems required in Section 15. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.7 The SWPPP must include estimated quantities anticipated at the start of the project for the life of the project for all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (e.g., linear feet of silt fence or square feet of erosion control blanket). [Minn. R. 7090] 5.8 The SWPPP must include the number of acres of impervious surface for both pre- and post-construction. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.9 The SWPPP must include a site map with existing and final grades, including drainage area boundaries, directions of flow and all discharge points where stormwater is leaving the site or entering a surface water. The site map must indicate the areas of steep slopes. The site map must also include impervious surfaces, soil types and locations of potential pollutant-generating activities as identified in Section 12. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.10 The SWPPP must include a map of all surface waters, existing wetlands, and stormwater ponds or basins that can be identified on maps such as United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle maps, the National Wetland Inventory map or equivalent maps and are within one mile (aerial radius measurement) from the project boundaries that will receive stormwater from the construction site, during or after construction. The SWPPP must identify if the surface waters are special or impaired waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.11 The SWPPP must include a site map showing construction activity areas that are adjacent to and drain to Public Waters for which the DNR has promulgated "work in water restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.12 Permittees must identify locations of 50' buffer zones as required in item 9.17 and 100' permanent buffer zones as required in item 23.11, on plan sheets in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.13 If permittees determine compliance with the following requirements is infeasible, they must document the determination in the SWPPP: a. temporary sediment basins as described in Section 14; and b. for linear projects, if the permanent stormwater treatment system cannot be constructed within the right-of-way, a reasonable attempt must be made to obtain additional right-of-way (item 15.9); and c. buffer zones as described in item 9.17 and item 23.11. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.14 If permittees determine that a temporary sediment basin is infeasible as described in item 14.10, the SWPPP must describe the alternative BMPs used. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.15 Where systems cannot meet the full volume reduction requirement on site, (e.g., the site has infiltration prohibitions, see item 16.14 through item 16.21) the permittee must document the reasons in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.16 The SWPPP must include any stormwater mitigation measures proposed to be part of the final project in any environmental review document, endangered species review, archeological or other required local, state or federal review conducted for the project. For purposes of this permit, mitigation measures means actions necessary to avoid, minimize, or mitigate for impacts related to erosion prevention, sediment control, the permanent stormwater treatment system, pollution prevention management measures and discharges associated with the project's construction activity. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.17 The SWPPP must describe the methods used for permanent cover of all exposed soil areas. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.18 Permittees must identify the locations of areas where construction will be phased to minimize the duration of exposed soil areas in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.19 For projects with a discharge point on the project within one (1) mile (aerial radius measurement) of and which flows to an impaired water, permittees must identify the impaired water(s), and any United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)-approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the pollutant(s) or stressor(s) described in item 23.7. Permittees' identification must include those TMDLs approved at any time prior to permit application submittal and are still in effect. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.20 Permittees must document in the SWPPP, all trained individuals identified in item 21.2. Documentation must include: a. names of personnel required to be trained; and b. dates of training and name of instructor(s) and entity providing training; and c. content of training course. If permittees do not know the names of the individuals at the time of application, the permittees must ensure they document training before construction activity commences. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.21 The SWPPP must identify a person knowledgeable and experienced in the application of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs who will coordinate with all contractors, subcontractors, and operators on-site to oversee the implementation of the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.22 The SWPPP must describe any specific chemicals and chemical treatment systems used for enhancing the sedimentation process and how it achieves compliance with item 9.18. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.23 The SWPPP must identify the person(s), organizations, or entities responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of permanent stormwater treatment systems. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.24 The SWPPP must describe methods to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil. Minimizing soil compaction is not required where the function of a specific area dictates compaction. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.25 The SWPPP must include any site assessments for groundwater or soil contamination required in item 16.15. [Minn. R. 7090] 5.26 The SWPPP must account for the following factors in designing temporary erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs: a. the expected amount, frequency, intensity, and duration of precipitation; and b. the nature of stormwater runoff and run-on at the site, including factors such as expected flow from impervious surfaces, slopes, and site drainage features; and c. the stormwater volume, velocity, and peak flowrates to minimize discharge of pollutants in stormwater and to minimize channel and streambank erosion and scour in the immediate vicinity of discharge points; and d. the range of soil particle sizes expected to be present. [Minn. R. 7090] 6.1 SWPPP Amendments. [Minn. R. 7090] 6.2 One of the individuals described in item 21.2.a or item 21.2.b or another qualified individual must complete all SWPPP changes. Changes involving the use of a less stringent BMP must include a justification describing how the replacement BMP is effective for the site characteristics. [Minn. R. 7090] 6.3 Permittees must amend the SWPPP to include additional or modified BMPs as necessary to correct problems identified or address situations whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather or seasonal conditions having a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or groundwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 6.4 Permittees must amend the SWPPP to include additional or modified BMPs as necessary to correct problems identified or address situations whenever inspections or investigations by the site owner or operator, USEPA or MPCA officials indicate the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or significantly minimizing the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or groundwater or the discharges are causing water quality standard exceedances (e.g., nuisance conditions as defined in Minn. R. 7050.0210, subp. 2) or the SWPPP is not consistent with the objectives of a USEPA approved TMDL. [Minn. R. 7050.0210] 7.1 BMP Selection and Installation. [Minn. R. 7090] 7.2 Permittees must select, install, and maintain the BMPs identified in the SWPPP and in this permit in an appropriate and functional manner and in accordance with relevant manufacturer specifications and accepted engineering practices. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.1 Erosion Prevention Practices. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.2 Before work begins, permittees must delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.3 Permittees must minimize the need for disturbance of portions of the project with steep slopes. When steep slopes must be disturbed, permittees must use techniques such as phasing and stabilization practices designed for steep slopes (e.g., slope draining and terracing). [Minn. R. 7090] 8.4 Permittees must stabilize all exposed soil areas, including stockpiles. Stabilization must be initiated immediately to limit soil erosion when construction activity has permanently or temporarily ceased on any portion of the site and will not resume for a period exceeding 14 calendar days. Stabilization must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the construction activity has ceased. Stabilization is not required on constructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces. Stabilization is not required on temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components (e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) but permittees must provide sediment controls at the base of the stockpile. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.5 For Public Waters that the Minnesota DNR has promulgated "work in water restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames, permittees must complete stabilization of all exposed soil areas within 200 feet of the water's edge, and that drain to these waters, within 24 hours during the restriction period. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.6 Permittees must stabilize the normal wetted perimeter of the last 200 linear feet of temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales that drain water from the site within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water or property edge. Permittees must complete stabilization of remaining portions of temporary or permanent ditches or swales within 14 calendar days after connecting to a surface water or property edge and construction in that portion of the ditch temporarily or permanently ceases. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.7 Temporary or permanent ditches or swales being used as a sediment containment system during construction (with properly designed rock-ditch checks, bio rolls, silt dikes, etc.) do not need to be stabilized. Permittees must stabilize these areas within 24 hours after their use as a sediment containment system ceases. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.8 Permittees must not use mulch, hydromulch, tackifier, polyacrylamide or similar erosion prevention practices within any portion of the normal wetted perimeter of a temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale section with a continuous slope of greater than 2 percent. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.9 Permittees must provide temporary or permanent energy dissipation at all pipe outlets within 24 hours after connection to a surface water or permanent stormwater treatment system. [Minn. R. 7090] 8.10 Permittees must not disturb more land (i.e., phasing) than can be effectively inspected and maintained in accordance with Section 11. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.1 Sediment Control Practices. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.2 Permittees must establish sediment control BMPs on all downgradient perimeters of the site and downgradient areas of the site that drain to any surface water, including curb and gutter systems. Permittees must locate sediment control practices upgradient of any buffer zones. Permittees must install sediment control practices before any upgradient land-disturbing activities begin and must keep the sediment control practices in place until they establish permanent cover. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.3 If downgradient sediment controls are overloaded, based on frequent failure or excessive maintenance requirements, permittees must install additional upgradient sediment control practices or redundant BMPs to eliminate the overloading and amend the SWPPP to identify these additional practices as required in item 6.3. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.4 Temporary or permanent drainage ditches and sediment basins designed as part of a sediment containment system (e.g., ditches with rock-check dams) require sediment control practices only as appropriate for site conditions. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.5 A floating silt curtain placed in the water is not a sediment control BMP to satisfy item 9.2 except when working on a shoreline or below the waterline. Immediately after the short term construction activity (e.g., installation of rip rap along the shoreline) in that area is complete, permittees must install an upland perimeter control practice if exposed soils still drain to a surface water. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.6 Permittees must re-install all sediment control practices adjusted or removed to accommodate short-term activities such as clearing or grubbing, or passage of vehicles, immediately after the short-term activity is completed. Permittees must re-install sediment control practices before the next precipitation event even if the short-term activity is not complete. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.7 Permittees must protect all storm drain inlets using appropriate BMPs during construction until they establish permanent cover on all areas with potential for discharging to the inlet. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.8 Permittees may remove inlet protection for a particular inlet if a specific safety concern (e.g. street flooding/freezing) is identified by the permittees or the jurisdictional authority (e.g., city/county/township/Minnesota Department of Transportation engineer). Permittees must document the need for removal in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.9 Permittees must provide silt fence or other effective sediment controls at the base of stockpiles on the downgradient perimeter. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.10 Permittees must locate stockpiles outside of natural buffers or surface waters, including stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems unless there is a bypass in place for the stormwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.11 Permittees must install a vehicle tracking BMP to minimize the track out of sediment from the construction site or onto paved roads within the site. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.12 Permittees must use street sweeping if vehicle tracking BMPs are not adequate to prevent sediment tracking onto the street. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.13 Permittees must install temporary sediment basins as required in Section 14. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.14 In any areas of the site where final vegetative stabilization will occur, permittees must restrict vehicle and equipment use to minimize soil compaction. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.15 Permittees must preserve topsoil on the site, unless infeasible. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.16 Permittees must direct discharges from BMPs to vegetated areas unless infeasible. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.17 Permittees must preserve a 50 foot natural buffer or, if a buffer is infeasible on the site, provide redundant (double) perimeter sediment controls when a surface water is located within 50 feet of the project's earth disturbances and stormwater flows to the surface water. Permittees must install perimeter sediment controls at least 5 feet apart unless limited by lack of available space. Natural buffers are not required adjacent to road ditches, judicial ditches, county ditches, stormwater conveyance channels, storm drain inlets, and sediment basins. If preserving the buffer is infeasible, permittees must document the reasons in the SWPPP. Sheet piling is a redundant perimeter control if installed in a manner that retains all stormwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 9.18 Permittees must use polymers, flocculants, or other sedimentation treatment chemicals in accordance with accepted engineering practices, dosing specifications and sediment removal design specifications provided by the manufacturer or supplier. The permittees must use conventional erosion and sediment controls prior to chemical addition and must direct treated stormwater to a sediment control system for filtration or settlement of the floc prior to discharge. [Minn. R. 7090] 10.1 Dewatering and Basin Draining. [Minn. R. 7090] 10.2 Permittees must discharge turbid or sediment-laden waters related to dewatering or basin draining (e.g., pumped discharges, trench/ditch cuts for drainage) to a temporary or permanent sediment basin on the project site unless infeasible. Permittees may dewater to surface waters if they visually check to ensure adequate treatment has been obtained and nuisance conditions (see Minn. R. 7050.0210, subp. 2) will not result from the discharge. If permittees cannot discharge the water to a sedimentation basin prior to entering a surface water, permittees must treat it with appropriate BMPs such that the discharge does not adversely affect the surface water or downstream properties. [Minn. R. 7050.0210] 10.3 If permittees must discharge water containing oil or grease, they must use an oil-water separator or suitable filtration device (e.g., cartridge filters, absorbents pads) prior to discharge. [Minn. R. 7090] 10.4 Permittees must discharge all water from dewatering or basin-draining activities in a manner that does not cause erosion or scour in the immediate vicinity of discharge points or inundation of wetlands in the immediate vicinity of discharge points that causes significant adverse impact to the wetland. [Minn. R. 7090] 10.5 If permittees use filters with backwash water, they must haul the backwash water away for disposal, return the backwash water to the beginning of the treatment process, or incorporate the backwash water into the site in a manner that does not cause erosion. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.1 Inspections and Maintenance. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.2 Permittees must ensure a trained person, as identified in item 21.2.b, will inspect the entire construction site at least once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 1/2 inch in 24 hours. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.3 Permittees must inspect and maintain all permanent stormwater treatment BMPs. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.4 Permittees must inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs and Pollution Prevention Management Measures to ensure integrity and effectiveness. Permittees must repair, replace or supplement all nonfunctional BMPs with functional BMPs by the end of the next business day after discovery unless another time frame is specified in item 11.5 or 11.6. Permittees may take additional time if field conditions prevent access to the area. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.5 During each inspection, permittees must inspect surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems but not curb and gutter systems, for evidence of erosion and sediment deposition. Permittees must remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems and restabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. Permittees must complete removal and stabilization within seven (7) calendar days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. Permittees must use all reasonable efforts to obtain access. If precluded, removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) days of obtaining access. Permittees are responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work in surface waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.6 Permittees must inspect construction site vehicle exit locations, streets and curb and gutter systems within and adjacent to the project for sedimentation from erosion or tracked sediment from vehicles. Permittees must remove sediment from all paved surfaces within one (1) calendar day of discovery or, if applicable, within a shorter time to avoid a safety hazard to users of public streets. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.7 Permittees must repair, replace or supplement all perimeter control devices when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/2 of the height of the device. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.8 Permittees must drain temporary and permanent sedimentation basins and remove the sediment when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches 1/2 the storage volume. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.9 Permittees must ensure that at least one individual present on the site (or available to the project site in three (3) calendar days) is trained in the job duties described in item 21.2.b. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.10 Permittees may adjust the inspection schedule described in item 11.2 as follows: a. inspections of areas with permanent cover can be reduced to once per month, even if construction activity continues on other portions of the site; or b. where sites have permanent cover on all exposed soil and no construction activity is occurring anywhere on the site, inspections can be reduced to once per month and, after 12 months, may be suspended completely until construction activity resumes. The MPCA may require inspections to resume if conditions warrant; or c. where construction activity has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, inspections may be suspended. Inspections must resume within 24 hours of runoff occurring, or upon resuming construction, whichever comes first. [Minn. R. 7090] 11.11 Permittees must record all inspections and maintenance activities within 24 hours of being conducted and these records must be retained with the SWPPP. These records must include: a. date and time of inspections; and b. name of persons conducting inspections; and c. accurate findings of inspections, including the specific location where corrective actions are needed; and d. corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities); and e. date of all rainfall events greater than 1/2 inches in 24 hours, and the amount of rainfall for each event. Permittees must obtain rainfall amounts by either a properly maintained rain gauge installed onsite, a weather station that is within one (1) mile of your location, or a weather reporting system that provides site specific rainfall data from radar summaries; and f. if permittees observe a discharge during the inspection, they must record and should photograph and describe the location of the discharge (i.e., color, odor, settled or suspended solids, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants); and g. any amendments to the SWPPP proposed as a result of the inspection must be documented as required in Section 6 within seven (7) calendar days. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.1 Pollution Prevention Management Measures. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.2 Permittees must place building products and landscape materials under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) or protect them by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. Permittees are not required to cover or protect products which are either not a source of contamination to stormwater or are designed to be exposed to stormwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.3 Permittees must place pesticides, fertilizers and treatment chemicals under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) or protect them by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.4 Permittees must store hazardous materials and toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste materials must be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.5 Permittees must properly store, collect and dispose solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. [Minn. R. 7035] 12.6 Permittees must position portable toilets so they are secure and will not tip or be knocked over. Permittees must properly dispose sanitary waste in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. [Minn. R. 7041] 12.7 Permittees must take reasonable steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. Permittees must ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. Permittees must report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. [Minn. Stat. 115.061] 12.8 Permittees must limit vehicle exterior washing and equipment to a defined area of the site. Permittees must contain runoff from the washing area in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and must dispose waste from the washing activity properly. Permittees must properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. [Minn. R. 7090] 12.9 Permittees must provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (e.g., concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. Permittees must prevent liquid and solid washout wastes from contacting the ground and must design the containment so it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Permittees must properly dispose liquid and solid wastes in compliance with MPCA rules. Permittees must install a sign indicating the location of the washout facility. [Minn. R. 7035, Minn. R. 7090] 13.1 Permit Termination Conditions. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.2 Permittees must complete all construction activity and must install permanent cover over all areas prior to submitting the NOT. Vegetative cover must consist of a uniform perennial vegetation with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth. Vegetation is not required where the function of a specific area dictates no vegetation, such as impervious surfaces or the base of a sand filter. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.3 Permittees must clean the permanent stormwater treatment system of any accumulated sediment and must ensure the system meets all applicable requirements in Section 15 through 19 and is operating as designed. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.4 Permittees must remove all sediment from conveyance systems prior to submitting the NOT. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.5 Permittees must remove all temporary synthetic erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs prior to submitting the NOT. Permittees may leave BMPs designed to decompose on-site in place. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.6 For residential construction only, permit coverage terminates on individual lots if the structures are finished and temporary erosion prevention and downgradient perimeter control is complete, the residence sells to the homeowner, and the permittee distributes the MPCA's "Homeowner Fact Sheet" to the homeowner. [Minn. R. 7090] 13.7 For construction projects on agricultural land (e.g., pipelines across cropland), permittees must return the disturbed land to its preconstruction agricultural use prior to submitting the NOT. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.1 Temporary Sediment Basins. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.2 Where ten (10) or more acres of disturbed soil drain to a common location, permittees must provide a temporary sediment basin to provide treatment of the runoff before it leaves the construction site or enters surface waters. Permittees may convert a temporary sediment basin to a permanent basin after construction is complete. The temporary basin is no longer required when permanent cover has reduced the acreage of disturbed soil to less than ten (10) acres draining to a common location. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.3 The temporary basin must provide live storage for a calculated volume of runoff from a two (2)-year, 24- hour storm from each acre drained to the basin or 1,800 cubic feet of live storage per acre drained, whichever is greater. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.4 Where permittees have not calculated the two (2)-year, 24-hour storm runoff amount, the temporary basin must provide 3,600 cubic feet of live storage per acre of the basins' drainage area. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.5 Permittees must design basin outlets to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.6 Permittees must design the outlet structure to withdraw water from the surface to minimize the discharge of pollutants. Permittees may temporarily suspend the use of a surface withdrawal mechanism during frozen conditions. The basin must include a stabilized emergency overflow to prevent failure of pond integrity. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.7 Permittees must provide energy dissipation for the basin outlet within 24 hours after connection to a surface water. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.8 Permittees must locate temporary basins outside of surface waters and any buffer zone required in item 23.11. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.9 Permittees must construct the temporary basins prior to disturbing 10 or more acres of soil draining to a common location. [Minn. R. 7090] 14.10 Where a temporary sediment basin meeting the requirements of item 14.3 through 14.9 is infeasible, permittees must install effective sediment controls such as smaller sediment basins and/or sediment traps, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips or any appropriate combination of measures as dictated by individual site conditions. In determining whether installing a sediment basin is infeasible, permittees must consider public safety and may consider factors such as site soils, slope, and available area on-site. Permittees must document this determination of infeasibility in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.1 Permanent Stormwater Treatment System. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.2 Permittees must design the project so all stormwater discharged from the project during and after construction activities does not cause a violation of state water quality standards, including nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downslope properties, or a significant adverse impact to wetlands caused by inundation or decrease of flow. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.3 Permittees must design and construct a permanent stormwater treatment system to treat the water quality volume if the project's ultimate development replaces vegetation and/or other pervious surfaces creating a net increase of one (1) or more acres of cumulative impervious surface. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.4 Permittees must calculate the water quality volume as one (1) inch times the net increase of impervious surfaces created by the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.5 Permittees must first consider volume reduction practices on-site (e.g., infiltration or other) when designing the permanent stormwater treatment system. If this permit prohibits infiltration as described in item 16.14 through item 16.21, permittees may consider a wet sedimentation basin, filtration basin or regional pond. This permit does not consider wet sedimentation basins and filtration systems to be volume reduction practices. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.6 For projects where the full volume reduction requirement cannot be met on-site, (e.g., the site has infiltration prohibitions), permittees must document the reasons in the SWPPP. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.7 Permittees must discharge the water quality volume to a permanent stormwater treatment system prior to discharge to a surface water. For purposes of this item, surface waters do not include man-made drainage systems that convey stormwater to a permanent stormwater treatment system. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.8 Where the proximity to bedrock precludes the installation of any of the permanent stormwater treatment practices required by Sections 15 through 19, permittees must install other treatment such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, prior to the discharge of stormwater to surface waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 15.9 For linear projects where permittees cannot treat the entire water quality volume within the existing rightof-way, permittees must make a reasonable attempt to obtain additional right-of-way, easement or other permission for stormwater treatment during the project planning process. Documentation of these attempts must be in the SWPPP. Permittees must still consider volume reduction practices first as described in item 15.5. If permittees cannot obtain additional right-of-way, easement or other permission, they must maximize the treatment of the water quality volume prior to discharge to surface waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.1 Infiltration Systems. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.2 Infiltration options include, but are not limited to: infiltration basins, infiltration trenches, rainwater gardens, bioretention areas without underdrains, swales with impermeable check dams, and natural depressions. If permittees utilize an infiltration system to meet the requirements of this permit, they must incorporate the design parameters in item 16.3 through item 16.21. Permittees must follow the infiltration prohibition in item 16.14 anytime an infiltration system is designed, including those not required by this permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.3 Permittees must design infiltration systems such that pre-existing hydrologic conditions of wetlands in the vicinity are not impacted (e.g., inundation or breaching a perched water table supporting a wetland). [Minn. R. 7090] 16.4 Permittees must not excavate infiltration systems to final grade, or within three (3) feet of final grade, until the contributing drainage area has been constructed and fully stabilized unless they provide rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to keep sediment and runoff completely away from the infiltration area. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.5 When excavating an infiltration system to within three (3) feet of final grade, permittees must stake off and mark the area so heavy construction vehicles or equipment do not compact the soil in the infiltration area. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.6 Permittees must use a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, forebay, or water quality inlet (e.g., grit chamber) to remove solids, floating materials, and oil and grease from the runoff, to the maximum extent practicable, before the system routes stormwater to the infiltration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.7 Permittees must design infiltration systems to provide a water quality volume (calculated as an instantaneous volume) of one (1) inch of runoff, or one (1) inch minus the volume of stormwater treated by another system on the site, from the net increase of impervious surfaces created by the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.8 Permittees must design the infiltration system to discharge all stormwater (including stormwater in excess of the water quality volume) routed to the system through the uppermost soil surface or engineered media surface within 48 hours. Permittees must route additional flows that cannot infiltrate within 48 hours to bypass the system through a stabilized discharge point. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.9 Permittees must provide a means to visually verify the infiltration system is discharging through the soil surface or filter media surface within 48 hours or less. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.10 Permittees must provide at least one soil boring, test pit or infiltrometer test in the location of the infiltration practice for determining infiltration rates. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.11 For design purposes, permittees must divide field measured infiltration rates by 2 as a safety factor or permittees can use soil-boring results with the infiltration rate chart in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual to determine design infiltration rates. When soil borings indicate type A soils, permittees should perform field measurements to verify the rate is not above 8.3 inches per hour. This permit prohibits infiltration if the field measured infiltration rate is above 8.3 inches per hour. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.12 Permittees must employ appropriate on-site testing ensure a minimum of three (3) feet of separation from the seasonally saturated soils (or from bedrock) and the bottom of the proposed infiltration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.13 Permittees must design a maintenance access, typically eight (8) feet wide, for the infiltration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.14 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems that receive runoff from vehicle fueling and maintenance areas including construction of infiltration systems not required by this permit. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.15 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems where infiltrating stormwater may mobilize high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater. Permittees must either complete the MPCA's contamination screening checklist or conduct their own assessment to determine the suitability for infiltration. Permittees must retain the checklist or assessment with the SWPPP. For more information and to access the MPCA's "contamination screening checklist" see the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.16 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas where soil infiltration rates are field measured at more than 8.3 inches per hour unless they amend soils to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.17 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas with less than three (3) feet of separation distance from the bottom of the infiltration system to the elevation of the seasonally saturated soils or the top of bedrock. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.18 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas of predominately Hydrologic Soil Group type D soils (clay). [Minn. R. 7090] 16.19 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in Minn. R. 4720.5100, subp. 13, if the system will be located: a. in an Emergency Response Area (ERA) within a DWSMA classified as having high or very high vulnerability as defined by the Minnesota Department of Health; or b. in an ERA within a DWSMA classified as moderate vulnerability unless a regulated MS4 Permittee performed or approved a higher level of engineering review sufficient to provide a functioning treatment system and to prevent adverse impacts to groundwater; or c. outside of an ERA within a DWSMA classified as having high or very high vulnerability, unless a regulated MS4 Permittee performed or approved a higher level of engineering review sufficient to provide a functioning treatment system and to prevent adverse impacts to groundwater. See "higher level of engineering review" in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual for more information. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.20 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst features. [Minn. R. 7090] 16.21 This permit prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas that receive runoff from the following industrial facilities not authorized to infiltrate stormwater under the NPDES stormwater permit for industrial activities: automobile salvage yards; scrap recycling and waste recycling facilities; hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities; or air transportation facilities that conduct deicing activities. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.1 Filtration Systems. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.2 Filtration options include, but are not limited to: sand filters with underdrains, biofiltration areas, swales using underdrains with impermeable check dams and underground sand filters. If permittees utilize a filtration system to meet the permanent stormwater treatment requirements of this permit, they must comply with items 17.3 through 17.11. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.3 Permittees must not install filter media until they construct and fully stabilize the contributing drainage area unless they provide rigorous erosion prevention and sediment controls (e.g., diversion berms) to keep sediment and runoff completely away from the filtration area. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.4 Permittees must design filtration systems to remove at least 80 percent of TSS. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.5 Permittees must use a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, small sedimentation basin, water quality inlet, forebay or hydrodynamic separator to remove settleable solids, floating materials, and oils and grease from the runoff, to the maximum extent practicable, before runoff enters the filtration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.6 Permittees must design filtration systems to treat a water quality volume (calculated as an instantaneous volume) of one (1) inch of runoff, or one (1) inch minus the volume of stormwater treated by another system on the site, from the net increase of impervious surfaces created by the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.7 Permittees must design the filtration system to discharge all stormwater (including stormwater in excess of the water quality volume) routed to the system through the uppermost soil surface or engineered media surface within 48 hours. Additional flows that the system cannot filter within 48 hours must bypass the system or discharge through an emergency overflow. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.8 Permittees must design the filtration system to provide a means to visually verify the system is discharging through the soil surface or filter media within 48 hours. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.9 Permittees must employ appropriate on-site testing to ensure a minimum of three (3) feet of separation between the seasonally saturated soils (or from bedrock) and the bottom of the proposed filtration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.10 Permittees must ensure that filtration systems with less than three (3) feet of separation between seasonally saturated soils or from bedrock are constructed with an impermeable liner. [Minn. R. 7090] 17.11 The permittees must design a maintenance access, typically eight (8) feet wide, for the filtration system. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.1 Wet Sedimentation Basin. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.2 Permittees using a wet sedimentation basin to meet the permanent stormwater treatment requirements of this permit must incorporate the design parameters in item 18.3 through 18.10. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.3 Permittees must design the basin to have a permanent volume of 1,800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe for each acre that drains to the basin. The basin's permanent volume must reach a minimum depth of at least three (3) feet and must have no depth greater than 10 feet. Permittees must configure the basin to minimize scour or resuspension of solids. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.4 Permittees must design the basin to provide live storage for a water quality volume (calculated as an instantaneous volume) of one (1) inch of runoff, or one (1) inch minus the volume of stormwater treated by another system on the site, from the net increase in impervious surfaces created by the project. [Minn.R. 7090] 18.5 Permittees must design basin outlets so the water quality volume discharges at no more than 5.66 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre of surface area of the basin. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.6 Permittees must design basin outlets to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. Basin outlets must have energy dissipation. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.7 Permittees must design the basin to include a stabilized emergency overflow to accommodate storm events in excess of the basin's hydraulic design. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.8 Permittees must design a maintenance access, typically eight (8) feet wide, for the basin. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.9 Permittees must locate basins outside of surface waters and any buffer zone required in item 23.11. Permittees must design basins to avoid draining water from wetlands unless the impact to the wetland complies with the requirements of Section 22. [Minn. R. 7090] 18.10 Permittees must design basins using an impermeable liner if located within active karst terrain. [Minn. R.7090] 19.1 Regional Wet Sedimentation Basins. [Minn. R. 7090] 19.2 When the entire water quality volume cannot be retained onsite, permittees can use or create regional wet sedimentation basins provided they are constructed basins, not a natural wetland or water body, (wetlands used as regional basins must be mitigated for, see Section 22). The owner must ensure the regional basin conforms to all requirements for a wet sedimentation basin as described in items 18.3 through 18.10 and must be large enough to account for the entire area that drains to the regional basin. Permittees must verify that the regional basin will discharge at no more than 5.66 cfs per acre of surface area of the basin and must provide a live storage volume of one inch times all the impervious area draining to the basin. Permittees cannot significantly degrade waterways between the project and the regional basin. The owner must obtain written authorization from the applicable LGU or private entity that owns and maintains the regional basin. [Minn. R. 7090] 20.1 SWPPP Availability. [Minn. R. 7090] 20.2 Permittees must keep the SWPPP, including all changes to it, and inspections and maintenance records at the site during normal working hours by permittees who have operational control of that portion of the site. [Minn. R. 7090] 21.1 Training Requirements. [Minn. R. 7090] 21.2 Permittees must ensure all of the following individuals receive training and the content and extent of the training is commensurate with the individual's job duties and responsibilities with regard to activities covered under this permit: a. Individuals preparing the SWPPP for the project. b. Individuals overseeing implementation of, revising and/or amending the SWPPP and individuals performing inspections for the project. One of these individuals must be available for an onsite inspection within 72 hours upon request by the MPCA. c. Individuals performing or supervising the installation, maintenance and repair of BMPs. [Minn. R. 7090] 21.3 Permittees must ensure individuals identified in Section 21 receive training from local, state, federal agencies, professional organizations, or other entities with expertise in erosion prevention, sediment control, permanent stormwater treatment and the Minnesota NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit. Permittees must ensure these individuals attend a refresher-training course every three (3) years.[Minn. R. 7090] 22.1 Requirements for Discharges to Wetlands. [Minn. R. 7050.0186] 22.2 If the project has any discharges with the potential for significant adverse impacts to a wetland, (e.g., conversion of a natural wetland to a stormwater pond) permittees must demonstrate that the wetland mitigative sequence has been followed in accordance with items 22.3 or 22.4. [Minn. R. 7050.0186] 22.3 If the potential adverse impacts to a wetland on a specific project site are addressed by permits or other approvals from an official statewide program (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 program, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the State of Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act) that are issued specifically for the project and project site, permittees may use the permit or other determination issued by these agencies to show the potential adverse impacts are addressed. For purposes of this permit, deminimus actions are determinations by the permitting agency that address the project impacts, whereas a non-jurisdictional determination does not address project impacts. [Minn. R. 7090] 22.4 If there are impacts from the project not addressed in one of the permits or other determinations discussed in item 22.3 (e.g., permanent inundation or flooding of the wetland, significant degradation of water quality, excavation, filling, draining), permittees must minimize all adverse impacts to wetlands by utilizing appropriate measures. Permittees must use measures based on the nature of the wetland, its vegetative community types and the established hydrology. These measures include in order of preference: a. avoid all significant adverse impacts to wetlands from the project and post-project discharge; b. minimize any unavoidable impacts from the project and post-project discharge; c. provide compensatory mitigation when the permittees determine(s) that there is no reasonable and practicable alternative to having a significant adverse impact on a wetland. For compensatory mitigation, wetland restoration or creation must be of the same type, size and whenever reasonable and practicable in the same watershed as the impacted wetland. [Minn. R. 7050.0186] 23.1 Additional Requirements for Discharges to Special (Prohibited, Restricted, Other) and Impaired Waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.2 The BMPs identified for each special or impaired water are required for those areas of the project draining to a discharge point on the project that is within one mile (aerial radius measurement) of special or impaired water and flows to that special or impaired water. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.3 Discharges to the following special waters identified as Prohibited in Minn. R. 7050.0035 Subp. 3 must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9, 23.10, 23.11, 23.13 and 23.14: a. Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness; Voyageurs National Park; Kettle River from the site of the former dam at Sandstone to its confluence with the Saint Croix River; Rum River from Ogechie Lake spillway to the northernmost confluence with Lake Onamia. b. Those portions of Lake Superior North of latitude 47 degrees, 57 minutes, 13 seconds, East of Hat Point, South of the Minnesota-Ontario boundary, and West of the Minnesota-Michigan boundary; c. Scientific and Natural Areas identified as in Minn. R. 7050.0335 Subp. 3: Boot Lake, Anoka County; Kettle River in sections 15, 22, 23, T 41 N, R 20, Pine County; Pennington Bog, Beltrami County; Purvis Lake-Ober Foundation, Saint Louis County; waters within the borders of Itasca Wilderness Sanctuary, Clearwater County; Wolsfeld Woods, Hennepin County; Green Water Lake, Becker County; Blackdog Preserve, Dakota County; Prairie Bush Clover, Jackson County; Black Lake Bog, Pine County; Pembina Trail Preserve, Polk County; and Falls Creek, Washington County. [Minn. R. 7050.0335, Subp. 3] 23.4 Discharges to the following special waters identified as Restricted must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9, 23.10 and 23.11: a. Lake Superior, except those portions identified as prohibited in item 23.3.b; b. Mississippi River in those portions from Lake Itasca to the southerly boundary of Morrison County that are included in the Mississippi Headwaters Board comprehensive plan dated February 12, 1981; c. Scenic or Recreational River Segments: Saint Croix River, entire length; Cannon River from northern city limits of Faribault to its confluence with the Mississippi River; North Fork of the Crow River from Lake Koronis outlet to the Meeker-Wright county line; Kettle River from north Pine County line to the site of the former dam at Sandstone; Minnesota River from Lac que Parle dam to Redwood County State Aid Highway 11; Mississippi River from County State Aid Highway 7 bridge in Saint Cloud to northwestern city limits of Anoka; and Rum River from State Highway 27 bridge in Onamia to Madison and Rice streets in Anoka; d. Lake Trout Lakes identified in Minn. R. 7050.0335 including lake trout lakes inside the boundaries of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and Voyageurs National Park; e. Calcareous Fens listed in Minn. R. 7050.0335, Subp. 1. [Minn. R. 7050.0335, Subp. 1] 23.5 Discharges to the Trout Lakes (other special water) identified in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 2 must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9, 23.10 and 23.11. [Minn. R. 6264.0050, Subp. 2] 23.6 Discharges to the Trout Streams (other special water) listed in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 4 must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9, 23.10, 23.11 and 23.12. [Minn. R. 6264.0050, Subp. 4] 23.7 Discharges to impaired waters or a water with an USEPA approved TMDL for any of the impairments listed in this item must incorporate the BMPs outlined in items 23.9 and 23.10. Impaired waters are waters identified as impaired under section 303 (d) of the federal Clean Water Act for phosphorus (nutrient eutrophication biological indicators), turbidity, TSS, dissolved oxygen or aquatic biota (fish bioassessment, aquatic plant bioassessment and aquatic macroinvertebrate bioassessment). Terms used for the pollutants or stressors in this item are subject to change. The MPCA will list terminology changes on its construction stormwater website. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.8 Where the additional BMPs in this Section conflict with requirements elsewhere in this permit, items 23.9 through 23.14 take precedence. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.9 Permittees must immediately initiate stabilization of exposed soil areas, as described in item 8.4, and complete the stabilization within seven (7) calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site temporarily or permanently ceases. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.10 Permittees must provide a temporary sediment basin as described in Section 14 for common drainage locations that serve an area with five (5) or more acres disturbed at one time. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.11 Permittees must include an undisturbed buffer zone of not less than 100 linear feet from a special water (not including tributaries) and must maintain this buffer zone at all times, both during construction and as a permanent feature post construction, except where a water crossing or other encroachment is necessary to complete the project. Permittees must fully document the circumstance and reasons the buffer encroachment is necessary in the SWPPP and include restoration activities. This permit allows replacement of existing impervious surface within the buffer. Permittees must minimize all potential water quality, scenic and other environmental impacts of these exceptions by the use of additional or redundant (double) BMPs and must document this in the SWPPP for the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.12 Permittees must design the permanent stormwater treatment system so the discharge from the project minimizes any increase in the temperature of trout streams resulting from the one (1) and two (2) year 24- hour precipitation events. This includes all tributaries of designated trout streams located within the same Public Land Survey System (PLSS) Section. Permittees must incorporate one or more of the following measures, in order of preference: a. Provide stormwater infiltration or other volume reduction practices as described in item 15.4 and 15.5, to reduce runoff. Infiltration systems must discharge all stormwater routed to the system within 24 hours. b. Provide stormwater filtration as described in Section 17. Filtration systems must discharge all stormwater routed to the system within 24 hours. c. Minimize the discharge from connected impervious surfaces by discharging to vegetated areas, or grass swales, and through the use of other non-structural controls. d. If ponding is used, the design must include an appropriate combination of measures such as shading, vegetated swale discharges or constructed wetland treatment cells that limit temperature increases. The pond must be designed as a dry pond and should draw down in 24 hours or less. e. Other methods that minimize any increase in the temperature of the trout stream. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.13 Permittees must conduct routine site inspections once every three (3) days as described in item 11.2 for projects that discharge to prohibited waters. [Minn. R. 7090] 23.14 If discharges to prohibited waters cannot provide volume reduction equal to one (1) inch times the net increase of impervious surfaces as required in item 15.4 and 15.5, permittees must develop a permanent stormwater treatment system design that will result in no net increase of TSS or phosphorus to the prohibited water. Permittees must keep the plan in the SWPPP for the project. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.1 General Provisions. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.2 If the MPCA determines that an individual permit would more appropriately regulate the construction activity, the MPCA may require an individual permit to continue the construction activity. Coverage under this general permit will remain in effect until the MPCA issues an individual permit. [Minn. R. 7001.0210,Subp. 6] 24.3 If the permittee cannot meet the terms and conditions of this general permit, an owner may request an individual permit, in accordance with Minn. R. 7001.0210 subp. 6. [Minn. R. 7001.0210, Subp. 6] 24.4 Any interested person may petition the MPCA to require an individual NPDES/SDS permit in accordance with 40 CFR 122.28(b)(3). [40 CFR 122.29(b)(3)] 24.5 Permittees must make the SWPPP, including all inspection reports, maintenance records, training records and other information required by this permit, available to federal, state, and local officials within three (3) days upon request for the duration of the permit and for three (3) years following the NOT. [Minn. R.7090] 24.6 Permittees may not assign or transfer this permit except when the transfer occurs in accordance with the applicable requirements of item 3.7 and 3.8. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.7 Nothing in this permit must be construed to relieve the permittees from civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance with the terms and conditions provided herein. Nothing in this permit must be construed to preclude the initiation of any legal action or relieve the permittees from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittees is/are or may be subject to under Section 311 of the Clean Water Act and Minn. Stat. Sect. 115 and 116, as amended. Permittees are not liable for permit requirements for activities occurring on those portions of a site where the permit has been transferred to another party as required in item 3.7 or the permittees have submitted the NOT as required in Section 4. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.8 The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of this permit or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstances is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit must not be affected thereby. [Minn. R. 7090] 24.9 The permittees must comply with the provisions of Minn. R. 7001.0150, subp. 3 and Minn. R. 7001.1090, subp. 1(A), 1(B), 1(C), 1(H), 1(I), 1(J), 1(K), and 1(L). [Minn. R. 7090] 24.10 The permittees must allow access as provided in 40 CFR 122.41(i) and Minn. Stat. Sect. 115.04. The permittees must allow representatives of the MPCA or any member, employee or agent thereof, when authorized by it, upon presentation of credentials, to enter upon any property, public or private, for the purpose of obtaining information or examination of records or conducting surveys or investigations. [40 CFR 122.41(i)] 24.11 For the purposes of Minn. R. 7090 and other documents that reference specific sections of this permit, "Stormwater Discharge Design Requirements" corresponds to Sections 5, 6 and 14 through 21; "Construction Activity Requirements" corresponds to Sections 7 through 13; and "Appendix A" corresponds to Sections 22 and 23. [Minn. R. 7090] 262 263 264 SB-1 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 PARKING AREA PHASE I BUILDING 100' x 200' PHASE I BUILDING 100' x 200' PHASE I BUILDING PHASE I BUILDING 100' x 225' 100' x 225' BUILDING B BUILDING A BUILDING D BUILDING C F L Y I N G C L O U D S D R I V EGREAT PLAINS BLVDDETENTION PONDReproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request. ©Copyright. This Print/Computer File Gries Architectural Group, Inc. Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying Or Is The Exclusive Property Of date: job: d. by: rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20227/5/2022 8:53:33 AMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-0.1 BJK, ZTS 05-06-2022 22-054A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1" = 50'-0"A-0.1 1 SITE PLAN 272 273 A-1.2 1 A-1.3 1 A-1.4 1 A-1.5 1100'-9 1/8"226'-8 3/4"79'-11 1/4"100'-9 1/8"31'-6 3/4"226'-8 3/4" 200'-8 3/4"200'-8 3/4"31'-6 3/4"100'-9 1/8"100'-9 1/8"25'-0"24'-0"BUILDING ABUILDING B BUILDING CBUILDING D Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request. ©Copyright. This Print/Computer File Gries Architectural Group, Inc. Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying Or Is The Exclusive Property Of date: job: d. by: rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:39 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-1.1 05-06-2022 22-054A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/16" = 1'-0"A-1.1 1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN- OVERALL 274 A101A100 A102 A103 A104 A105 A106 A107 A108 3'-4 3/4" 3'-4" 1'-4" 22'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 22'-0" 1'-4"3'-4"3'-4 3/4" 33'-10"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"33'-10"98'-2 3/8"200'-1 1/2" A A A A A A 4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"100'-5 1/2"25'-0"24'-0"2'-0"2'-0" 24'-0 3/4"153'-0 3/4"78'-2 1/8"27'-0 3/4" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 4'-0 3/4" A109 A110 A111 A112 A113 A114 Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request. ©Copyright. This Print/Computer File Gries Architectural Group, Inc. Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying Or Is The Exclusive Property Of date: job: d. by: rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:41 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-1.2 Author 05-06-2022 22-054 12/19/08A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/8" = 1'-0"A-1.2 1 BUILDING A - FLOOR PLAN 275 B100 B101 B102 B103 B104 B105 B106 B107 B108 A A A A A A 4'-0 3/4" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 27'-0 3/4" 25'-0"24'-0 3/4"153'-0 3/4"24'-0"78'-5 3/4"1'-8 3/8"2'-0"200'-5 1/8" 3'-8 3/8" 3'-4" 1'-4" 22'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 22'-0" 1'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4 3/4" 4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9"4'-9" 6" 4'-9" 33'-10" 6" 25'-6" 6" 25'-6" 6" 25'-6" 6" 25'-6" 6" 25'-6" 6" 33'-10"98'-2 3/8"14'-2 1/8"16'-0"12'-0"16'-0"12'-0"8'-0"3 5/8"B109 B110 B111 B112 B113 B114B117B116B115 Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request. ©Copyright. This Print/Computer File Gries Architectural Group, Inc. Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying Or Is The Exclusive Property Of date: job: d. by: rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:42 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-1.3 Author 05-06-2022 22-054 05/03/22A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/8" = 1'-0"A-1.3 1 BUILDING B - FLOOR PLAN 276 C100C101C102C103C104C105C106C107C108C109226'-1 1/2"27'-0 3/4" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 27'-0 3/4"100'-5 1/2"33'-10"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"33'-10"98'-6"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"3'-4 3/4" 3'-4" 1'-4" 22'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 22'-0" 1'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4 3/4"226'-1 1/2"AAAAAAAC110C111C112C113C114C115C116Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request.©Copyright. This Print/Computer FileGries Architectural Group, Inc.Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying OrIs The Exclusive Property Ofdate:job:d. by:rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:43 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-1.4Author05-06-202222-05405/03/22A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/8" = 1'-0"A-1.41BUILDING C - FLOOR PLAN 277 D100D101D102D103D104D105D106D107D108D1093'-8 3/8" 3'-4" 1'-4" 22'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 22'-0" 1'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4 3/4"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"4'-9"6"4'-9"33'-10"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"25'-6"6"33'-10"98'-6"AAAAAAA14'-2 1/8" 16'-0" 12'-0" 16'-0" 12'-0" 16'-0" 14'-7"100'-9 1/8"226'-5 1/8"27'-4 3/8" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 27'-0 3/4"D116D115D114D113D112D111D110D117D118D119Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request.©Copyright. This Print/Computer FileGries Architectural Group, Inc.Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying OrIs The Exclusive Property Ofdate:job:d. by:rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:44 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-1.5Author05-06-202222-05405/03/22A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/8" = 1'-0"A-1.51BUILDING D - FLOOR PLAN 278 HOLLOW METAL (GALVANIZED). PAINTED, INSULATED1" THK., PPG SOLARBAN 60, CLEAR, TEMP. INSULATED GLAZING (STD. NARROW LITE)AOVERHEAD DOORBSEE SCHED.SCHED.SEESEE SCHED.SEE SCHED.HOLLOW METALPAINTED1ALUMINUM, STORE-FRONT FRAME (2"x4 1/2"), CLEAR ANODIZED1" THK., PPG SOLARBAN 60, TEMP. INSULATED GLAZING210'-0" 8'-0"ALUMINUM, STORE-FRONT FRAME (2"x4 1/2"), CLEAR ANODIZED1" THK., PPG SOLARBAN 60, TEMP. INSULATED GLAZING3ALUMINUM, STORE-FRONT FRAME (2"x4 1/2"), CLEAR ANODIZED1" THK., PPG SOLARBAN 60, TEMP. INSULATED GLAZING412'-0" 4'-0"10'-0" 8'-0"18'-0"16'-0"18'-0"SEE SCHED. 2"2"SCHED.SEE2"2" 4'-1" 2" 3'-5" 2"16'-0"2" EQ.2"EQ.2"EQ.2"EQ. 2"2" 4'-1" 2" 3'-5" 2"2" EQ.2"EQ. 2"8'-0"2"3'-8"2"16'-0"2" EQ.2"EQ.2"EQ.2"EQ. 2"GENERAL DOOR & WINDOW NOTES:• VERIFY ALL OPENING DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO FABRICATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF ALL DOORS & FRAMES.• ALL HARDWARE TO BE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (A.D.A.) COMPLIANT.• PROPER EXIT HARDWARE IS REQUIRED ON ALL EXIT AND EXIT ACCESS DOORS. HARDWARE SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF IBC SECTION 1008.1.8 THRU 1008.1.9.• ALL FRAMES TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO FABRICATION BY WINDOW SUPPLIER.• ALL GLAZING IN HAZARDOUS IMPACT AREAS SHALL BE SAFETY GLAZING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2406.• ALL HOLLOW METAL DOORS/FRAMES SHALL BE WELDED. NO KNOCK DOWN FRAMES PERMITTED.• ALL EXPOSED STEEL LINTELS TO BE PRIMED & PAINTED PER SPECIFICATION.• ALL EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL EXIT DOORS TO HAVE LATCH GUARDS AND CLOSERS.• ALUMINUM ENTRANCE DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH CYLINDER LOCK, INTERIOR TURN-LOCK, SURFACE MOUNTED SELF CLOSER AND DOOR STOP.• STANDARD ROUND PUSH/PULLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. FINISH TO MATCH DOORS.• ALL KEYING SHALL BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED WITH OWNER AND/OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.• ALL INTERIOR ALUMINUM FRAMES SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM 1/8" CAULK JOINT AROUND PERIMETER.6" MTL. STUDS @ 16" O.C.NOTE:ALL EXPOSED C.M.U. OUTSIDE CORNERS @ WALLS, OPENING JAMBS & UNFINISHED SILL SHALL HAVE SQUARE CORNERS, TYP.NOTE:ALL GYP. BOARD SHALL EXTEND TO FULL HEIGHT OF STUD WALL, OR TO BOT. OF GYP. BD. CLG.(REFER TO REFL. CLG. PLANS). ALL GYP. BD. SHALL EXTEND 6" ABOVE HIGHEST ADJACENT CEILING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL STUDS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED AS TO MAINTAIN A RIGID WALL ASSEMBLY.5/8"6"5/8"7 1/4"ASTUD & GYP. BD., FULL HT.5/8" QUIET ROCK, EACH SIDENOTE:MTL. STUD SIZES & GUAGES FOR INTERIOR NON-BRG. WALLS:3 5/8", 25 GA., 13'-6" HIGH @ 16" O.C., 11'-9" @ 24" O.C.3 5/8", 22 GA., 15'-3" HIGH @ 16" O.C., 13'-4" @ 24" O.C.3 5/8", 20 GA., 15'-11" HIGH @ 16" O.C., 13'-11" @ 24" O.C.6", 25 GA., 20'-0" HIGH @ 16" O.C., 17'-6" @ 24" O.C.6", 22 GA., 22'-9" HIGH @ 16" O.C., 19'-11" @ 24" O.C.3 5/8", 20 GA., 23'-9" HIGH @ 16" O.C., 20'-9" @ 24" O.C.(THESE STUD HEIGHTS ARE BASED ON HAVING (1) LAYER OF DRYWALL EACH FACE).NOTE:18 GA. STUDS @ DOOR JAMBS.Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request.©Copyright. This Print/Computer FileGries Architectural Group, Inc.Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying OrIs The Exclusive Property Ofdate:job:d. by:rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:47 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-3.1ZTS05-06-202222-054A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/4" = 1'-0"DOOR ELEVATIONS1/4" = 1'-0"FRAME ELEVATIONSDOOR SCHEDULEDOORNO.FROMTOHANDDOORFRAMEHRD'W.GROUPFIRERATINGREMARKSOPENINGTYPEMAT'LFINISHTYPEMAT'LFINISHWIDTHHEIGHTFIRST FLOORA100 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE LH 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A H.M. PAINT 1H.M. PAINT --A101 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 22' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --A102 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --A103 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --A104 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --A105 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --A106 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --A107 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 22' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --A108 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE RH 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A H.M. PAINT 1H.M. PAINT --A109 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --A110 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --A111 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --A112 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --A113 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --A114 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B100 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE LH 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A H.M. PAINT 1H.M. PAINT --B101 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 22' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --B102 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --B103 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --B104 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --B105 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --B106 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --B107 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 22' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --B108 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE RH 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A H.M. ANOD. 1H.M. PAINT --B109 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B110 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B111 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B112 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B113 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B114 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B115 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B116 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --B117 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 8' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 3 ALUM. ANOD. --C100 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE LH 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A H.M. PAINT 1H.M. PAINT --C101 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 22' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --C102 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --C103 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --C104 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --C105 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --C106 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --C107 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --C108 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 22' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --C109 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE RH 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A H.M. PAINT 1H.M. PAINT --C110 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --C111 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --C112 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --C113 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --C114 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --C115 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --C116 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --D100 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE LH 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A H.M. PAINT 1H.M. PAINT --D101 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 22' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --D102 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --D103 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --D104 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --D105 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --D106 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --D107 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 16' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --D108 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE OHD 22' - 0" 16' - 0" B ALUM. ANOD. MFR. -- -- --D109 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE RH 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A H.M. PAINT 1H.M. PAINT --D110 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --D111 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --D112 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --D113 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --D114 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --D115 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --D116 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 4' - 0" -- -- -- 4 ALUM. ANOD. --D117 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --D118 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --D119 EXTERIOR INT. STORAGE BL 16' - 0" 8' - 0" -- -- -- 2 ALUM. ANOD. --1" = 1'-0"INTERIOR WALL TYPES279 MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-2MP-2MP-2MP-2MP-2MP-2CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1A107A106A105A108A104A103A102A101A10037'-9 3/4"D-1D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-1RF-120'-0"BRK-1MP-2CMU-1A109A110A111A112A113A114CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-14" 12"4" 12"RF-2RF-130'-0"20'-0"37'-9 3/4"BRK-1CMU-1MP-14" 12"4" 12"4" 12"4" 12"37'-9 3/4"RF-220'-0"30'-0"CMU-1MP-14" 12"4" 12"20'-0"37'-9 3/4"EXTERIOR FINISH KEY NOTESMP-1STONEFACED CMU:MFR: COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATIONFINISH/COLOR: SPLITFACE/BUFFLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCMU-1MTL. WALL PANEL:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: INSULATED METAL PANEL - CF ARCHITECTURAL VERTICAL - 30" WIDE, 2-1/2" THK.COLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONE WITH STUCCO FINISHLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMATERIAL SUMMARYKEY NOTEMATERIAL SUMMARYKEY NOTECURTAIN WALL:MFR: KAWNEER (BASIS OF DESIGN)STYLE: 1600 CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (MATCH EXIST.), THERMALLY BROKEN (REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & FRAME ELEVATIONS) REINFORCED MULLIONS AS REQUIRED, VERIFIED AND ENGINEERED BY CURTAINWALL MFR.GLAZING: 1" INSULATED, PPG, SOLARBAN 60, COLOR T.B.D.FINISH/COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED (CLASS 1)CW-1MP-2BRICK:MFR: COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATIONFINISH/COLOR: COFFEE BLENDLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBRK-1D-1DOOR:COLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONE OR COLOR TO MATCH OHDLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSD-2OVERHEAD DOOR:MANUFACTURER: CHI OVERHEAD DOORSCOLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONELOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMTL. WALL PANEL:MANUFACTURER: LONGBOARD INSPIRING FACADESMATERIAL: 6" V-GROOVE, TONGUE & GROOVE LAP SIDINGCOLOR/FINISH: DARK ACACIALOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRF-2ROOFING:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: CFR ROOF PANEL COLOR/FINISH: TERRACOTTALOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRF-1ROOFING:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: CFR ROOF PANEL COLOR/FINISH: MEDIUM BRONZELOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSReproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request.©Copyright. This Print/Computer FileGries Architectural Group, Inc.Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying OrIs The Exclusive Property Ofdate:job:d. by:rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:48 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-4.1ZTS05-06-202222-054A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.11BUILDING A - NORTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.12BUILDING A - SOUTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.13BUILDING A - EAST ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.14BUILDING A - WEST ELEVATIONOPENINGS = 49.5%MP-1= 28.5%MP-2= 16.8%CMU-1 = 5.2%BRK-1 = 17.5%MP-2= 23.8%SF-1 = 17.6%CMU-1 = 41.1%MP-1= 68.7%BRK-1= 23.6%CMU-1= 7.6%MP-1 = 89.5%CMU-1= 10.5%280 EXTERIOR FINISH KEY NOTESMP-1STONEFACED CMU:MFR: COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATIONFINISH/COLOR: SPLITFACE/BUFFLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCMU-1MTL. WALL PANEL:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: INSULATED METAL PANEL - CF ARCHITECTURAL VERTICAL - 30" WIDE, 2-1/2" THK.COLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONE WITH STUCCO FINISHLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMATERIAL SUMMARYKEY NOTEMATERIAL SUMMARYKEY NOTECURTAIN WALL:MFR: KAWNEER (BASIS OF DESIGN)STYLE: 1600 CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (MATCH EXIST.), THERMALLY BROKEN (REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & FRAME ELEVATIONS) REINFORCED MULLIONS AS REQUIRED, VERIFIED AND ENGINEERED BY CURTAINWALL MFR.GLAZING: 1" INSULATED, PPG, SOLARBAN 60, COLOR T.B.D.FINISH/COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED (CLASS 1)CW-1MP-2BRICK:MFR: COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATIONFINISH/COLOR: COFFEE BLENDLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBRK-1D-1DOOR:COLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONE OR COLOR TO MATCH OHDLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSD-2OVERHEAD DOOR:MANUFACTURER: CHI OVERHEAD DOORSCOLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONELOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMTL. WALL PANEL:MANUFACTURER: LONGBOARD INSPIRING FACADESMATERIAL: 6" V-GROOVE, TONGUE & GROOVE LAP SIDINGCOLOR/FINISH: DARK ACACIALOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRF-2ROOFING:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: CFR ROOF PANEL COLOR/FINISH: TERRACOTTALOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRF-1ROOFING:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: CFR ROOF PANEL COLOR/FINISH: MEDIUM BRONZELOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMP-1CMU-1MP-2MP-1MP-2MP-1MP-2MP-1MP-2MP-1MP-2MP-1MP-2MP-1MP-2CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1B108B107B106B105B104B103B102B101B10037'-9 3/4"D-2D-1D-1D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2RF-120'-0"CMU-1MP-2BRK-1B109B110B111B112B113B114CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-14" 12"4" 12"RF-1RF-237'-9 3/4"20'-0"30'-0"MP-1CMU-14" 12"4" 12"37'-9 3/4"20'-0"CMU-1MP-2BRK-1B115B116B117CW-1CW-14" 12"4" 12"4" 12"4" 12"RF-220'-0"37'-9 3/4"30'-0"Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request.©Copyright. This Print/Computer FileGries Architectural Group, Inc.Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying OrIs The Exclusive Property Ofdate:job:d. by:rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:50 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-4.2ZTS05-06-202222-054A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.21BUILDING B - NORTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.22BUILDING B - SOUTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.23BUILDING B - EAST ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.24BUILDING B - WEST ELEVATIONOPENINGS = 49.7%MP-1= 27%MP-2= 16.2%CMU-1 = 7.1%BRK-1 = 17.5%MP-2= 23.8%SF-1 = 17.6%CMU-1 = 41.1%MP-1= 89.5%CMU-1= 10.5%BRK-1= 23.6%MP-1 = 35.2%SF-1= 10.4%CMU-1= 30.8%281 MP-1C110C111C112C113C114C115C116CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1RF-137'-9 3/4"20'-0"CMU-1MP-1MP-2MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1CMU-1C100C101C102C103C104C105C106C107C108C109D-1D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-1RF-120'-0"37'-9 3/4"CMU-1MP-14" 12"4" 12"37'-9 3/4"20'-0"CMU-1MP-14" 12"4" 12"37'-9 3/4"20'-0"EXTERIOR FINISH KEY NOTESMP-1STONEFACED CMU:MFR: COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATIONFINISH/COLOR: SPLITFACE/BUFFLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCMU-1MTL. WALL PANEL:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: INSULATED METAL PANEL - CF ARCHITECTURAL VERTICAL - 30" WIDE, 2-1/2" THK.COLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONE WITH STUCCO FINISHLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMATERIAL SUMMARYKEY NOTEMATERIAL SUMMARYKEY NOTECURTAIN WALL:MFR: KAWNEER (BASIS OF DESIGN)STYLE: 1600 CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (MATCH EXIST.), THERMALLY BROKEN (REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & FRAME ELEVATIONS) REINFORCED MULLIONS AS REQUIRED, VERIFIED AND ENGINEERED BY CURTAINWALL MFR.GLAZING: 1" INSULATED, PPG, SOLARBAN 60, COLOR T.B.D.FINISH/COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED (CLASS 1)CW-1MP-2BRICK:MFR: COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATIONFINISH/COLOR: COFFEE BLENDLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBRK-1D-1DOOR:COLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONE OR COLOR TO MATCH OHDLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSD-2OVERHEAD DOOR:MANUFACTURER: CHI OVERHEAD DOORSCOLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONELOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMTL. WALL PANEL:MANUFACTURER: LONGBOARD INSPIRING FACADESMATERIAL: 6" V-GROOVE, TONGUE & GROOVE LAP SIDINGCOLOR/FINISH: DARK ACACIALOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRF-2ROOFING:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: CFR ROOF PANEL COLOR/FINISH: TERRACOTTALOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRF-1ROOFING:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: CFR ROOF PANEL COLOR/FINISH: MEDIUM BRONZELOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSReproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request.©Copyright. This Print/Computer FileGries Architectural Group, Inc.Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying OrIs The Exclusive Property Ofdate:job:d. by:rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:51 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-4.3ZTS05-06-202222-054A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.31BUILDING C - NORTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.32BUILDING C - SOUTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.33BUILDING C - EAST ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.34BUILDING C - WEST ELEVATIONOPENINGS = 20.1%MP-1= 27.4%MP-2= 17.4%CMU-1 = 5.1%MP-1= 90.2%SF-1 = 8.8%MP-1= 89.5%CMU-1= 10.5%MP-1 = 89.5%CMU-1= 10.5%282 MP-1D110D111D112D113D114D115D116CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1CW-1RF-137'-9 3/4"20'-0"MP-1MP-2CMU-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-1MP-2MP-2MP-2MP-2MP-2MP-2MP-2CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1CMU-1D101D102D103D104D105D106D107D108D100D109D-2D-1D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-1RF-120'-0"37'-9 3/4"MP-1CMU-14" 12"4" 12"20'-0"37'-9 3/4"MP-2CMU-1D117D118D119CW-1CW-14" 12"4" 12"20'-0"37'-9 3/4"EXTERIOR FINISH KEY NOTESMP-1STONEFACED CMU:MFR: COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATIONFINISH/COLOR: SPLITFACE/BUFFLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCMU-1MTL. WALL PANEL:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: INSULATED METAL PANEL - CF ARCHITECTURAL VERTICAL - 30" WIDE, 2-1/2" THK.COLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONE WITH STUCCO FINISHLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMATERIAL SUMMARYKEY NOTEMATERIAL SUMMARYKEY NOTECURTAIN WALL:MFR: KAWNEER (BASIS OF DESIGN)STYLE: 1600 CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (MATCH EXIST.), THERMALLY BROKEN (REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & FRAME ELEVATIONS) REINFORCED MULLIONS AS REQUIRED, VERIFIED AND ENGINEERED BY CURTAINWALL MFR.GLAZING: 1" INSULATED, PPG, SOLARBAN 60, COLOR T.B.D.FINISH/COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED (CLASS 1)CW-1MP-2BRICK:MFR: COUNTY MATERIALS CORPORATIONFINISH/COLOR: COFFEE BLENDLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSBRK-1D-1DOOR:COLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONE OR COLOR TO MATCH OHDLOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSD-2OVERHEAD DOOR:MANUFACTURER: CHI OVERHEAD DOORSCOLOR/FINISH: SANDSTONELOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSMTL. WALL PANEL:MANUFACTURER: LONGBOARD INSPIRING FACADESMATERIAL: 6" V-GROOVE, TONGUE & GROOVE LAP SIDINGCOLOR/FINISH: DARK ACACIALOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRF-2ROOFING:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: CFR ROOF PANEL COLOR/FINISH: TERRACOTTALOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSRF-1ROOFING:MANUFACTURER: METL SPANMATERIAL: CFR ROOF PANEL COLOR/FINISH: MEDIUM BRONZELOCATION: REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSReproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request.©Copyright. This Print/Computer FileGries Architectural Group, Inc.Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying OrIs The Exclusive Property Ofdate:job:d. by:rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:53 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-4.4ZTS05-06-202222-054A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.41BUILDING D - NORTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.42BUILDING D - SOUTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.43BUILDING D - EAST ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"A-4.44BUILDING D - WEST ELEVATIONOPENINGS = 50.1%MP-1= 28%MP-2= 14.9%CMU-1 = 7%MP-2= 90.2%SF-1 = 9.8%MP-1= 89.5%CMU-1= 10.5%MP-2 = 41.1%SF-1= 12.5CMU-1= 46.4%283 Reproducing Is Prohibited. Return Upon Request.©Copyright. This Print/Computer FileGries Architectural Group, Inc.Use Only For Purpose Which Loaned. Copying OrIs The Exclusive Property Ofdate:job:d. by:rev.:GriesArchitectural Group Inc.500 North Commercial StreetNeenah, Wisconsin 54956Phone: 920-722-2445 Fax: 920-722-6605www.gries.designCITY SUBMITTAL 05/06/20225/6/2022 1:09:54 PMZ:\2022\22-054 RSI Marine Storage\22-054 Revit\22-054_RSI Marine Storage.rvtA-11.1ZTS05-06-202222-054A NEW STORAGE FACILITY FOR:RSI MARINE STORAGECHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA284 285 286 RSI MARINE Chanhassen, MN For RSI MARINE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NARRATIVE & SUMMARY June, 1, 2022 I hereby certify that this plan and report were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________ Joel G. Cooper P.E. License No. 18495 287 EXISTING CONDITIONS The RSI site is located at the northeast corner of Flying Cloud Drive and Great Plains Blvd. The existing site was previously constructed with a building and parking lot for an animal daycare and overnight facility. The site has both hydrologic soil groups B and C on-site. The predominate soil group for the site is hydrologic group C. The site drains from north to south and drains to the Flying Cloud Drive ditch along the north side of the road and eventually drains to across the road and to Rice Lake. The site ranges in elevation from 798 on the north side to 726 on the south side. The property is currently sitting empty and not being utilized. The vegetation is a combination of grass and trees. PROPOSED CONDITIONS The site is being proposed to be developed into four (4) buildings of 20,000 square feet each with an access off of Flying Cloud Drive in the southeast corner of the property. The proposed development will collect storm water from the building and drive and direct the stormwater into a stormwater pond in the southwest corner of the property through an on-site storm sewer system. The proposed site has been modeled using HydroCAD with Atlas 14 stormwater events for the 1,2,10 and 100-year events. The proposed and existing stormwater run-off rates for the site are as follows: YEAR EXISTING PROPOSED The infiltration for the site will be provided with a filtration pond adjacent to the stormwater pond. The proposed site will have 2.99 acres or 130,220 square feet of impervious surface. The impervious surface is required to infiltrate the first one inch of stormwater runoff. The proposed infiltration required is 130,220 sq ft x 1 inch/12inch or 10,852 cubic feet. The infiltration volume provided is 16,921 cubic feet. WATER QUALITY We have modeled the site using P8 to determine the pre-development loading for the site and the post-development loading. The following is a summary of the model results: EXISTING PROPOSED TSS 429.2 lbs/yr 20.7 lbs/yr TP 1.8 lbs/yr 0.4 lbs/yr 1 YEAR 5.99 c.f.s. 5.03 c.f.s. 2 YEAR 8.37 c.f.s 6.60 c.f.s 10 YEAR 23.65 c.f.s. 9.75 c.f.s 100 YEAR 45.21 c.f.s. 16.53 c.f.s 288 The TSS and TP for the proposed development is less than the existing site conditions and meets the requirements of the lower Minnesota River Watershed requirements. We have attached the HydroCAD and P8 model for your review. If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, James R Hill, Inc. Joel G. Cooper P.E. President 289 1S EX SUBCATCHMENT Routing Diagram for RSI Marine site Chanhassen,Mn 23953 Prepared by JRH INC, Printed 5/6/2022 HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link 290 EXISTING RSI Marine site Chanhassen,Mn 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 7.860 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1S) 0.410 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1S) 8.270 75 TOTAL AREA 291 EXISTING RSI Marine site Chanhassen,Mn 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 8.270 HSG C 1S 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 8.270 TOTAL AREA 292 EXISTING MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50"RSI Marine site Chanhassen,Mn 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: EX SUBCATCHMENT Runoff = 5.99 cfs @ 12.28 hrs, Volume= 0.448 af, Depth= 0.65" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50" Area (ac) CN Description 7.860 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 0.410 98 Paved parking, HSG C 8.270 75 Weighted Average 7.860 95.04% Pervious Area 0.410 4.96% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.3 270 0.2000 0.34 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 2.7 290 0.0138 1.76 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 0.9 130 0.1080 2.30 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 16.9 690 Total Subcatchment 1S: EX SUBCATCHMENT Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50" Runoff Area=8.270 ac Runoff Volume=0.448 af Runoff Depth=0.65" Flow Length=690' Tc=16.9 min CN=75 5.99 cfs 293 EXISTING MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87"RSI Marine site Chanhassen,Mn 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: EX SUBCATCHMENT Runoff = 8.37 cfs @ 12.27 hrs, Volume= 0.604 af, Depth= 0.88" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 7.860 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 0.410 98 Paved parking, HSG C 8.270 75 Weighted Average 7.860 95.04% Pervious Area 0.410 4.96% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.3 270 0.2000 0.34 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 2.7 290 0.0138 1.76 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 0.9 130 0.1080 2.30 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 16.9 690 Total Subcatchment 1S: EX SUBCATCHMENT Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=8.270 ac Runoff Volume=0.604 af Runoff Depth=0.88" Flow Length=690' Tc=16.9 min CN=75 8.37 cfs 294 EXISTING MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.87"RSI Marine site Chanhassen,Mn 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: EX SUBCATCHMENT Runoff = 23.65 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 1.616 af, Depth= 2.34" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.87" Area (ac) CN Description 7.860 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 0.410 98 Paved parking, HSG C 8.270 75 Weighted Average 7.860 95.04% Pervious Area 0.410 4.96% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.3 270 0.2000 0.34 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 2.7 290 0.0138 1.76 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 0.9 130 0.1080 2.30 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 16.9 690 Total Subcatchment 1S: EX SUBCATCHMENT Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.87" Runoff Area=8.270 ac Runoff Volume=1.616 af Runoff Depth=2.34" Flow Length=690' Tc=16.9 min CN=75 23.65 cfs 295 EXISTING MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38"RSI Marine site Chanhassen,Mn 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: EX SUBCATCHMENT Runoff = 45.21 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 3.092 af, Depth= 4.49" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 7.860 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 0.410 98 Paved parking, HSG C 8.270 75 Weighted Average 7.860 95.04% Pervious Area 0.410 4.96% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 13.3 270 0.2000 0.34 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 2.7 290 0.0138 1.76 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 0.9 130 0.1080 2.30 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 16.9 690 Total Subcatchment 1S: EX SUBCATCHMENT Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)50 48 46 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38" Runoff Area=8.270 ac Runoff Volume=3.092 af Runoff Depth=4.49" Flow Length=690' Tc=16.9 min CN=75 45.21 cfs 296 1S Pond drainage 2S Direct runoff 1P Stormwater pond 3L offsite total Routing Diagram for Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Prepared by JRH INC, Printed 5/6/2022 HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link 297 PROPOSED Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 5.470 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1S, 2S) 2.790 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1S, 2S) 8.260 82 TOTAL AREA 298 PROPOSED Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (all nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 8.260 HSG C 1S, 2S 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 8.260 TOTAL AREA 299 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pond drainage Runoff = 9.54 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.636 af, Depth= 1.06" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50" Area (ac) CN Description 2.660 98 Paved parking, HSG C 4.570 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7.230 83 Weighted Average 4.570 63.21% Pervious Area 2.660 36.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.6 145 0.3300 0.37 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 0.9 115 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 7.9 100 0.1000 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 0.4 75 0.0300 3.52 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 15.8 435 Total Subcatchment 1S: Pond drainage Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50" Runoff Area=7.230 ac Runoff Volume=0.636 af Runoff Depth=1.06" Flow Length=435' Tc=15.8 min CN=83 9.54 cfs 300 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Direct runoff Runoff = 1.03 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.064 af, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50" Area (ac) CN Description 0.130 98 Paved parking, HSG C 0.900 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1.030 77 Weighted Average 0.900 87.38% Pervious Area 0.130 12.62% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.87" 1.9 50 0.3300 0.43 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.87" 12.2 150 Total Subcatchment 2S: Direct runoff Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50" Runoff Area=1.030 ac Runoff Volume=0.064 af Runoff Depth=0.74" Flow Length=150' Tc=12.2 min CN=77 1.03 cfs 301 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Inflow Area = 7.230 ac, 36.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.06" for 1 year event Inflow = 9.54 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.636 af Outflow = 4.61 cfs @ 12.49 hrs, Volume= 0.636 af, Atten= 52%, Lag= 14.4 min Primary = 4.61 cfs @ 12.49 hrs, Volume= 0.636 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 727.50' Surf.Area= 16,171 sf Storage= 16,922 cf Peak Elev= 728.01' @ 12.49 hrs Surf.Area= 16,921 sf Storage= 25,323 cf (8,402 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 318.6 min calculated for 0.248 af (39% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 52.1 min ( 877.3 - 825.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 726.00' 82,927 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 726.00 6,391 0 0 727.50 16,171 16,922 16,922 728.00 16,909 8,270 25,192 730.00 20,005 36,914 62,106 731.00 21,638 20,822 82,927 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 724.20'18.0" Round Culvert L= 29.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 724.20' / 723.95' S= 0.0086 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #2 Device 1 727.50'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Device 2 725.50'18.0" Round Culvert L= 30.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 725.50' / 725.50' S= 0.0000 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #4 Device 1 730.50'48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=4.61 cfs @ 12.49 hrs HW=728.01' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Passes 4.61 cfs of 17.24 cfs potential flow) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 4.61 cfs @ 2.33 fps) 3=Culvert (Passes 4.61 cfs of 5.35 cfs potential flow) 4=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 302 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=7.230 ac Peak Elev=728.01' Storage=25,323 cf 9.54 cfs 4.61 cfs 303 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 726.00 6,391 0 726.05 6,717 328 726.10 7,043 672 726.15 7,369 1,032 726.20 7,695 1,409 726.25 8,021 1,802 726.30 8,347 2,211 726.35 8,673 2,636 726.40 8,999 3,078 726.45 9,325 3,536 726.50 9,651 4,011 726.55 9,977 4,501 726.60 10,303 5,008 726.65 10,629 5,531 726.70 10,955 6,071 726.75 11,281 6,627 726.80 11,607 7,199 726.85 11,933 7,788 726.90 12,259 8,392 726.95 12,585 9,014 727.00 12,911 9,651 727.05 13,237 10,305 727.10 13,563 10,975 727.15 13,889 11,661 727.20 14,215 12,364 727.25 14,541 13,083 727.30 14,867 13,818 727.35 15,193 14,569 727.40 15,519 15,337 727.45 15,845 16,121 727.50 16,171 16,922 727.55 16,245 17,732 727.60 16,319 18,546 727.65 16,392 19,364 727.70 16,466 20,185 727.75 16,540 21,010 727.80 16,614 21,839 727.85 16,688 22,672 727.90 16,761 23,508 727.95 16,835 24,348 728.00 16,909 25,192 728.05 16,986 26,039 728.10 17,064 26,890 728.15 17,141 27,745 728.20 17,219 28,604 728.25 17,296 29,467 728.30 17,373 30,334 728.35 17,451 31,204 728.40 17,528 32,079 728.45 17,606 32,957 728.50 17,683 33,840 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 728.55 17,760 34,726 728.60 17,838 35,616 728.65 17,915 36,509 728.70 17,993 37,407 728.75 18,070 38,309 728.80 18,147 39,214 728.85 18,225 40,123 728.90 18,302 41,037 728.95 18,380 41,954 729.00 18,457 42,875 729.05 18,534 43,799 729.10 18,612 44,728 729.15 18,689 45,660 729.20 18,767 46,597 729.25 18,844 47,537 729.30 18,921 48,481 729.35 18,999 49,429 729.40 19,076 50,381 729.45 19,154 51,337 729.50 19,231 52,297 729.55 19,308 53,260 729.60 19,386 54,227 729.65 19,463 55,199 729.70 19,541 56,174 729.75 19,618 57,153 729.80 19,695 58,135 729.85 19,773 59,122 729.90 19,850 60,113 729.95 19,928 61,107 730.00 20,005 62,106 730.05 20,087 63,108 730.10 20,168 64,114 730.15 20,250 65,125 730.20 20,332 66,139 730.25 20,413 67,158 730.30 20,495 68,180 730.35 20,577 69,207 730.40 20,658 70,238 730.45 20,740 71,273 730.50 20,822 72,312 730.55 20,903 73,355 730.60 20,985 74,402 730.65 21,066 75,454 730.70 21,148 76,509 730.75 21,230 77,569 730.80 21,311 78,632 730.85 21,393 79,700 730.90 21,475 80,771 730.95 21,556 81,847 731.00 21,638 82,927 304 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 1 year Rainfall=2.50"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 3L: offsite total Inflow Area = 8.260 ac, 33.78% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.02" for 1 year event Inflow = 5.03 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 0.700 af Primary = 5.03 cfs @ 12.46 hrs, Volume= 0.700 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 3L: offsite total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=8.260 ac 5.03 cfs 5.03 cfs 305 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pond drainage Runoff = 12.21 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.809 af, Depth= 1.34" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 2.660 98 Paved parking, HSG C 4.570 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7.230 83 Weighted Average 4.570 63.21% Pervious Area 2.660 36.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.6 145 0.3300 0.37 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 0.9 115 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 7.9 100 0.1000 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 0.4 75 0.0300 3.52 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 15.8 435 Total Subcatchment 1S: Pond drainage Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=7.230 ac Runoff Volume=0.809 af Runoff Depth=1.34" Flow Length=435' Tc=15.8 min CN=83 12.21 cfs 306 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 11HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Direct runoff Runoff = 1.40 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.084 af, Depth= 0.98" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87" Area (ac) CN Description 0.130 98 Paved parking, HSG C 0.900 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1.030 77 Weighted Average 0.900 87.38% Pervious Area 0.130 12.62% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.87" 1.9 50 0.3300 0.43 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.87" 12.2 150 Total Subcatchment 2S: Direct runoff Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87" Runoff Area=1.030 ac Runoff Volume=0.084 af Runoff Depth=0.98" Flow Length=150' Tc=12.2 min CN=77 1.40 cfs 307 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 12HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Inflow Area = 7.230 ac, 36.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.34" for 2 year event Inflow = 12.21 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 0.809 af Outflow = 5.97 cfs @ 12.48 hrs, Volume= 0.809 af, Atten= 51%, Lag= 14.0 min Primary = 5.97 cfs @ 12.48 hrs, Volume= 0.809 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 727.50' Surf.Area= 16,171 sf Storage= 16,922 cf Peak Elev= 728.13' @ 12.48 hrs Surf.Area= 17,114 sf Storage= 27,448 cf (10,526 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 241.6 min calculated for 0.420 af (52% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 47.9 min ( 868.1 - 820.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 726.00' 82,927 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 726.00 6,391 0 0 727.50 16,171 16,922 16,922 728.00 16,909 8,270 25,192 730.00 20,005 36,914 62,106 731.00 21,638 20,822 82,927 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 724.20'18.0" Round Culvert L= 29.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 724.20' / 723.95' S= 0.0086 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #2 Device 1 727.50'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Device 2 725.50'18.0" Round Culvert L= 30.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 725.50' / 725.50' S= 0.0000 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #4 Device 1 730.50'48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=5.97 cfs @ 12.48 hrs HW=728.13' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Passes 5.97 cfs of 17.66 cfs potential flow) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes 5.97 cfs of 6.37 cfs potential flow) 3=Culvert (Inlet Controls 5.97 cfs @ 3.38 fps) 4=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 308 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 13HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=7.230 ac Peak Elev=728.13' Storage=27,448 cf 12.21 cfs 5.97 cfs 309 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 14HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 726.00 6,391 0 726.05 6,717 328 726.10 7,043 672 726.15 7,369 1,032 726.20 7,695 1,409 726.25 8,021 1,802 726.30 8,347 2,211 726.35 8,673 2,636 726.40 8,999 3,078 726.45 9,325 3,536 726.50 9,651 4,011 726.55 9,977 4,501 726.60 10,303 5,008 726.65 10,629 5,531 726.70 10,955 6,071 726.75 11,281 6,627 726.80 11,607 7,199 726.85 11,933 7,788 726.90 12,259 8,392 726.95 12,585 9,014 727.00 12,911 9,651 727.05 13,237 10,305 727.10 13,563 10,975 727.15 13,889 11,661 727.20 14,215 12,364 727.25 14,541 13,083 727.30 14,867 13,818 727.35 15,193 14,569 727.40 15,519 15,337 727.45 15,845 16,121 727.50 16,171 16,922 727.55 16,245 17,732 727.60 16,319 18,546 727.65 16,392 19,364 727.70 16,466 20,185 727.75 16,540 21,010 727.80 16,614 21,839 727.85 16,688 22,672 727.90 16,761 23,508 727.95 16,835 24,348 728.00 16,909 25,192 728.05 16,986 26,039 728.10 17,064 26,890 728.15 17,141 27,745 728.20 17,219 28,604 728.25 17,296 29,467 728.30 17,373 30,334 728.35 17,451 31,204 728.40 17,528 32,079 728.45 17,606 32,957 728.50 17,683 33,840 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 728.55 17,760 34,726 728.60 17,838 35,616 728.65 17,915 36,509 728.70 17,993 37,407 728.75 18,070 38,309 728.80 18,147 39,214 728.85 18,225 40,123 728.90 18,302 41,037 728.95 18,380 41,954 729.00 18,457 42,875 729.05 18,534 43,799 729.10 18,612 44,728 729.15 18,689 45,660 729.20 18,767 46,597 729.25 18,844 47,537 729.30 18,921 48,481 729.35 18,999 49,429 729.40 19,076 50,381 729.45 19,154 51,337 729.50 19,231 52,297 729.55 19,308 53,260 729.60 19,386 54,227 729.65 19,463 55,199 729.70 19,541 56,174 729.75 19,618 57,153 729.80 19,695 58,135 729.85 19,773 59,122 729.90 19,850 60,113 729.95 19,928 61,107 730.00 20,005 62,106 730.05 20,087 63,108 730.10 20,168 64,114 730.15 20,250 65,125 730.20 20,332 66,139 730.25 20,413 67,158 730.30 20,495 68,180 730.35 20,577 69,207 730.40 20,658 70,238 730.45 20,740 71,273 730.50 20,822 72,312 730.55 20,903 73,355 730.60 20,985 74,402 730.65 21,066 75,454 730.70 21,148 76,509 730.75 21,230 77,569 730.80 21,311 78,632 730.85 21,393 79,700 730.90 21,475 80,771 730.95 21,556 81,847 731.00 21,638 82,927 310 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 2 year Rainfall=2.87"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 15HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 3L: offsite total Inflow Area = 8.260 ac, 33.78% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.30" for 2 year event Inflow = 6.60 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 0.893 af Primary = 6.60 cfs @ 12.38 hrs, Volume= 0.893 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 3L: offsite total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=8.260 ac 6.60 cfs 6.60 cfs 311 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 16HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pond drainage Runoff = 22.99 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 1.520 af, Depth= 2.52" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27" Area (ac) CN Description 2.660 98 Paved parking, HSG C 4.570 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7.230 83 Weighted Average 4.570 63.21% Pervious Area 2.660 36.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.6 145 0.3300 0.37 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 0.9 115 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 7.9 100 0.1000 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 0.4 75 0.0300 3.52 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 15.8 435 Total Subcatchment 1S: Pond drainage Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=7.230 ac Runoff Volume=1.520 af Runoff Depth=2.52" Flow Length=435' Tc=15.8 min CN=83 22.99 cfs 312 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 17HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Direct runoff Runoff = 2.97 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.174 af, Depth= 2.03" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27" Area (ac) CN Description 0.130 98 Paved parking, HSG C 0.900 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1.030 77 Weighted Average 0.900 87.38% Pervious Area 0.130 12.62% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.87" 1.9 50 0.3300 0.43 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.87" 12.2 150 Total Subcatchment 2S: Direct runoff Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27" Runoff Area=1.030 ac Runoff Volume=0.174 af Runoff Depth=2.03" Flow Length=150' Tc=12.2 min CN=77 2.97 cfs 313 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 18HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Inflow Area = 7.230 ac, 36.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.52" for 10 year event Inflow = 22.99 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 1.520 af Outflow = 8.53 cfs @ 12.54 hrs, Volume= 1.520 af, Atten= 63%, Lag= 18.1 min Primary = 8.53 cfs @ 12.54 hrs, Volume= 1.520 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 727.50' Surf.Area= 16,171 sf Storage= 16,922 cf Peak Elev= 728.79' @ 12.54 hrs Surf.Area= 18,131 sf Storage= 39,023 cf (22,102 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 155.5 min calculated for 1.131 af (74% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 45.2 min ( 852.6 - 807.4 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 726.00' 82,927 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 726.00 6,391 0 0 727.50 16,171 16,922 16,922 728.00 16,909 8,270 25,192 730.00 20,005 36,914 62,106 731.00 21,638 20,822 82,927 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 724.20'18.0" Round Culvert L= 29.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 724.20' / 723.95' S= 0.0086 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #2 Device 1 727.50'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Device 2 725.50'18.0" Round Culvert L= 30.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 725.50' / 725.50' S= 0.0000 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #4 Device 1 730.50'48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=8.53 cfs @ 12.54 hrs HW=728.79' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Passes 8.53 cfs of 19.70 cfs potential flow) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes 8.53 cfs of 17.92 cfs potential flow) 3=Culvert (Inlet Controls 8.53 cfs @ 4.82 fps) 4=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 314 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 19HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)24 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Inflow Area=7.230 ac Peak Elev=728.79' Storage=39,023 cf 22.99 cfs 8.53 cfs 315 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 20HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 726.00 6,391 0 726.05 6,717 328 726.10 7,043 672 726.15 7,369 1,032 726.20 7,695 1,409 726.25 8,021 1,802 726.30 8,347 2,211 726.35 8,673 2,636 726.40 8,999 3,078 726.45 9,325 3,536 726.50 9,651 4,011 726.55 9,977 4,501 726.60 10,303 5,008 726.65 10,629 5,531 726.70 10,955 6,071 726.75 11,281 6,627 726.80 11,607 7,199 726.85 11,933 7,788 726.90 12,259 8,392 726.95 12,585 9,014 727.00 12,911 9,651 727.05 13,237 10,305 727.10 13,563 10,975 727.15 13,889 11,661 727.20 14,215 12,364 727.25 14,541 13,083 727.30 14,867 13,818 727.35 15,193 14,569 727.40 15,519 15,337 727.45 15,845 16,121 727.50 16,171 16,922 727.55 16,245 17,732 727.60 16,319 18,546 727.65 16,392 19,364 727.70 16,466 20,185 727.75 16,540 21,010 727.80 16,614 21,839 727.85 16,688 22,672 727.90 16,761 23,508 727.95 16,835 24,348 728.00 16,909 25,192 728.05 16,986 26,039 728.10 17,064 26,890 728.15 17,141 27,745 728.20 17,219 28,604 728.25 17,296 29,467 728.30 17,373 30,334 728.35 17,451 31,204 728.40 17,528 32,079 728.45 17,606 32,957 728.50 17,683 33,840 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 728.55 17,760 34,726 728.60 17,838 35,616 728.65 17,915 36,509 728.70 17,993 37,407 728.75 18,070 38,309 728.80 18,147 39,214 728.85 18,225 40,123 728.90 18,302 41,037 728.95 18,380 41,954 729.00 18,457 42,875 729.05 18,534 43,799 729.10 18,612 44,728 729.15 18,689 45,660 729.20 18,767 46,597 729.25 18,844 47,537 729.30 18,921 48,481 729.35 18,999 49,429 729.40 19,076 50,381 729.45 19,154 51,337 729.50 19,231 52,297 729.55 19,308 53,260 729.60 19,386 54,227 729.65 19,463 55,199 729.70 19,541 56,174 729.75 19,618 57,153 729.80 19,695 58,135 729.85 19,773 59,122 729.90 19,850 60,113 729.95 19,928 61,107 730.00 20,005 62,106 730.05 20,087 63,108 730.10 20,168 64,114 730.15 20,250 65,125 730.20 20,332 66,139 730.25 20,413 67,158 730.30 20,495 68,180 730.35 20,577 69,207 730.40 20,658 70,238 730.45 20,740 71,273 730.50 20,822 72,312 730.55 20,903 73,355 730.60 20,985 74,402 730.65 21,066 75,454 730.70 21,148 76,509 730.75 21,230 77,569 730.80 21,311 78,632 730.85 21,393 79,700 730.90 21,475 80,771 730.95 21,556 81,847 731.00 21,638 82,927 316 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 10 year Rainfall=4.27"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 21HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 3L: offsite total Inflow Area = 8.260 ac, 33.78% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.46" for 10 year event Inflow = 9.75 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 1.693 af Primary = 9.75 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 1.693 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 3L: offsite total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=8.260 ac 9.75 cfs 9.75 cfs 317 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 22HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Pond drainage Runoff = 47.98 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 3.246 af, Depth= 5.39" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 2.660 98 Paved parking, HSG C 4.570 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7.230 83 Weighted Average 4.570 63.21% Pervious Area 2.660 36.79% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.6 145 0.3300 0.37 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 0.9 115 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 7.9 100 0.1000 0.21 Sheet Flow, Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.87" 0.4 75 0.0300 3.52 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 15.8 435 Total Subcatchment 1S: Pond drainage Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38" Runoff Area=7.230 ac Runoff Volume=3.246 af Runoff Depth=5.39" Flow Length=435' Tc=15.8 min CN=83 47.98 cfs 318 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 23HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Direct runoff Runoff = 6.84 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.404 af, Depth= 4.71" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38" Area (ac) CN Description 0.130 98 Paved parking, HSG C 0.900 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 1.030 77 Weighted Average 0.900 87.38% Pervious Area 0.130 12.62% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.0200 0.16 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.87" 1.9 50 0.3300 0.43 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.87" 12.2 150 Total Subcatchment 2S: Direct runoff Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38" Runoff Area=1.030 ac Runoff Volume=0.404 af Runoff Depth=4.71" Flow Length=150' Tc=12.2 min CN=77 6.84 cfs 319 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 24HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Inflow Area = 7.230 ac, 36.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.39" for 100 year event Inflow = 47.98 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 3.246 af Outflow = 12.87 cfs @ 12.62 hrs, Volume= 3.246 af, Atten= 73%, Lag= 22.9 min Primary = 12.87 cfs @ 12.62 hrs, Volume= 3.246 af Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 727.50' Surf.Area= 16,171 sf Storage= 16,922 cf Peak Elev= 730.44' @ 12.62 hrs Surf.Area= 20,720 sf Storage= 71,021 cf (54,099 cf above start) Plug-Flow detention time= 122.0 min calculated for 2.857 af (88% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 53.2 min ( 845.4 - 792.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 726.00' 82,927 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 726.00 6,391 0 0 727.50 16,171 16,922 16,922 728.00 16,909 8,270 25,192 730.00 20,005 36,914 62,106 731.00 21,638 20,822 82,927 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 724.20'18.0" Round Culvert L= 29.0' RCP, groove end projecting, Ke= 0.200 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 724.20' / 723.95' S= 0.0086 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #2 Device 1 727.50'4.0' long Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir 2 End Contraction(s) #3 Device 2 725.50'18.0" Round Culvert L= 30.0' RCP, mitered to conform to fill, Ke= 0.700 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 725.50' / 725.50' S= 0.0000 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 1.77 sf #4 Device 1 730.50'48.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=12.87 cfs @ 12.62 hrs HW=730.44' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=Culvert (Passes 12.87 cfs of 24.08 cfs potential flow) 2=Sharp-Crested Rectangular Weir (Passes 12.87 cfs of 56.19 cfs potential flow) 3=Culvert (Inlet Controls 12.87 cfs @ 7.28 fps) 4=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 320 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 25HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Inflow Area=7.230 ac Peak Elev=730.44' Storage=71,021 cf 47.98 cfs 12.87 cfs 321 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 26HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: Stormwater pond Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 726.00 6,391 0 726.05 6,717 328 726.10 7,043 672 726.15 7,369 1,032 726.20 7,695 1,409 726.25 8,021 1,802 726.30 8,347 2,211 726.35 8,673 2,636 726.40 8,999 3,078 726.45 9,325 3,536 726.50 9,651 4,011 726.55 9,977 4,501 726.60 10,303 5,008 726.65 10,629 5,531 726.70 10,955 6,071 726.75 11,281 6,627 726.80 11,607 7,199 726.85 11,933 7,788 726.90 12,259 8,392 726.95 12,585 9,014 727.00 12,911 9,651 727.05 13,237 10,305 727.10 13,563 10,975 727.15 13,889 11,661 727.20 14,215 12,364 727.25 14,541 13,083 727.30 14,867 13,818 727.35 15,193 14,569 727.40 15,519 15,337 727.45 15,845 16,121 727.50 16,171 16,922 727.55 16,245 17,732 727.60 16,319 18,546 727.65 16,392 19,364 727.70 16,466 20,185 727.75 16,540 21,010 727.80 16,614 21,839 727.85 16,688 22,672 727.90 16,761 23,508 727.95 16,835 24,348 728.00 16,909 25,192 728.05 16,986 26,039 728.10 17,064 26,890 728.15 17,141 27,745 728.20 17,219 28,604 728.25 17,296 29,467 728.30 17,373 30,334 728.35 17,451 31,204 728.40 17,528 32,079 728.45 17,606 32,957 728.50 17,683 33,840 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 728.55 17,760 34,726 728.60 17,838 35,616 728.65 17,915 36,509 728.70 17,993 37,407 728.75 18,070 38,309 728.80 18,147 39,214 728.85 18,225 40,123 728.90 18,302 41,037 728.95 18,380 41,954 729.00 18,457 42,875 729.05 18,534 43,799 729.10 18,612 44,728 729.15 18,689 45,660 729.20 18,767 46,597 729.25 18,844 47,537 729.30 18,921 48,481 729.35 18,999 49,429 729.40 19,076 50,381 729.45 19,154 51,337 729.50 19,231 52,297 729.55 19,308 53,260 729.60 19,386 54,227 729.65 19,463 55,199 729.70 19,541 56,174 729.75 19,618 57,153 729.80 19,695 58,135 729.85 19,773 59,122 729.90 19,850 60,113 729.95 19,928 61,107 730.00 20,005 62,106 730.05 20,087 63,108 730.10 20,168 64,114 730.15 20,250 65,125 730.20 20,332 66,139 730.25 20,413 67,158 730.30 20,495 68,180 730.35 20,577 69,207 730.40 20,658 70,238 730.45 20,740 71,273 730.50 20,822 72,312 730.55 20,903 73,355 730.60 20,985 74,402 730.65 21,066 75,454 730.70 21,148 76,509 730.75 21,230 77,569 730.80 21,311 78,632 730.85 21,393 79,700 730.90 21,475 80,771 730.95 21,556 81,847 731.00 21,638 82,927 322 PROPOSED MSE 24-hr 3 100 year Rainfall=7.38"Proposed RSI Marine site Chanhassen 23953 Printed 5/6/2022Prepared by JRH INC Page 27HydroCAD® 10.00-25 s/n 00744 © 2019 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Link 3L: offsite total Inflow Area = 8.260 ac, 33.78% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.30" for 100 year event Inflow = 16.53 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 3.650 af Primary = 16.53 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 3.650 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Link 3L: offsite total Inflow Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=8.260 ac 16.53 cfs 16.53 cfs 323 P8 Urban Catchment Model, Version 3.5 Case RSI_EX.p8c Title Startup Case PrecFile MSP4918.pcp PartFile nurp50.p8p Case Title Startup Case Case Data File RSI_EX.p8c Path G:\MSOFFICE\AA Docs\RSI Marine\p8\ Case Notes: Storm Data File MSP4918.pcp Particle File nurp50.p8p Air Temp File File MSP4918.tem Time Steps Per Hour 4 Minimum Inter-Event Time (hrs) 10 Maximum Continuity Error % 2 Rainfall Breakpoint (inches) 0.8 Precipitation Scale Factor 1 Air Temp Offset (deg-F) 0 Loops Thru Storm File 1 Simulation Dates Start 6/1/1970 Keep 1/1/1971 Stop 12/31/1972 Max Snowfall Temperature (deg-f) 32.0 SnowMelt Temperature (deg-f) 32.0 Snowmelt Coef (in/degF-Day) 0.06 Soil Freeze Temp (deg-F) 32.0 Snowmelt Abstraction Factor 1.00 Evapo-Trans. Calibration Factor 1.00 Growing Season Start Month 5 Growing Season End Month 10 5-Day Antecedent Rainfall + Runoff (inches) CN Antecedent Moisture Condition AMC-II AMC-III Growing Season 1.40 2.10 NonGrowing Season 0.50 1.10 Watershed Data Watershed Name Existing Site Runoff to Device Outflow Infiltration to Device Watershed Area 8.27 SCS Curve Number (Pervious) 74 Scale Factor for Pervious Runoff Load 1 Indirectly Connected Imperv Fraction 0 UnSwept Impervious Fraction 0.05 UnSwept Depression Storage (inches) 0.02 UnSwept Imperv. Runoff Coefficient 1 UnSwept Scale Factor for Particle Loads 1 Swept Impervious Fraction 0 Swept Depression Storage (inches) 0.02 Swept Imperv. Runoff Coefficient 1 Swept Scale Factor for Particle Loads 1 Sweeping Frequency 0 Sweeping Efficiency 1 Sweeping Start Date (MMDD) 101 Sweeping Stop Date (MMDD) 1231 324 Device Data Device Name Outflow Device Type PIPE Infiltration Outlet Normal Outlet Spillway Outlet Particle Removal Scale Factor Bottom Elevation (ft) Bottom Area (acres) Permanent Pool Area (acres) Permanent Pool Volume (ac-ft) Perm Pool Infilt Rate (in/hr) Flood Pool Area (acres) Flood Pool Volume (ac-ft) Flood Pool Infilt Rate (in/hr) Infilt Basin Void Fraction (%) Detention Pond Outlet Parameters Outlet Type Outlet Orifice Diameter (in) Orifice Discharge Coef Outlet Weir Length (ft) Weir Discharge Coef Perforated Riser Height (ft) Number of Holes in Riser Holes Diameter Flood Pool Drain Time (hrs) Swale Parameters Length of Flow Path (ft) Slope of Flow Path % Bottom Width (ft) Side Slope (ft-v/ft-h) Maximum Depth of Flow (ft) Mannings n Constant Hydraulic Model Pipe, Splitter, Aquifer Parameter Hydraulic Res. Time (hrs) 0 Particle Data Particle File nurp50.p8p Particle Class P0% P10% P30% P50% P80% Filtration Efficiency (%) 90 100 100 100 100 Settling Velocity (ft/hr) 0 0.03 0.3 1.5 15 First Order Decay Rate (1/day) 0 0 0 0 0 2nd Order Decay (1/day-ppm) 0 0 0 0 0 Impervious Runoff Conc (ppm) 1 0 0 0 0 Pervious Runoff Conc (ppm) 1 100 100 100 200 Pervious Conc Exponent 0 1 1 1 1 Accum. Rate (lbs-ac-day) 0 1.75 1.75 1.75 3.5 Particle Removal Rate (1/day) 0 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Washoff Coefficient 0 20 20 20 20 Washoff Exponent 0 2 2 2 2 Sweeper Efficiency 0 0 0 5 15 Water Quality Component Data Component Name TSS TP TKN CU PB ZN Water Quality Criteria (ppm) Level 1 5 0.025 2 2 0.02 5 Level 2 10 0.05 1 0.0048 0.014 0.0362 Level 3 20 0.1 0.5 0.02 0.15 0.38 Content Scale Factor 1 1 1 1 1 1 Particle Composition (mg/kg) P0% 0 99000 600000 13600 2000 64000 P10% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 P30% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 P50% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 P80% 1000000 0 0 340 180 0 325 P8 Urban Catchment Model, Version 3.5 Run Date 05/26/22 Case RSI_PROP.p8c FirstDate 01/01/71 Precip(in) 50.4 Title Startup Case LastDate 12/31/72 Rain(in) 40.76 PrecFile MSP4918.pcp Events 134 Snow(in) 9.67 PartFile nurp50.p8p TotalHrs 16440 TotalYrs 1.88 Case Title Startup Case Case Data File RSI_PROP.p8c Path G:\MSOFFICE\AA Docs\RSI Marine\p8\ Case Notes: Storm Data File MSP4918.pcp Particle File nurp50.p8p Air Temp File File MSP4918.tem Time Steps Per Hour 10 Minimum Inter-Event Time (hrs) 10 Maximum Continuity Error % 2 Rainfall Breakpoint (inches) 0.8 Precipitation Scale Factor 1 Air Temp Offset (deg-F) 0 Loops Thru Storm File 1 Simulation Dates Start 6/1/1970 Keep 1/1/1971 Stop 12/31/1972 Max Snowfall Temperature (deg-f) 32.0 SnowMelt Temperature (deg-f) 32.0 Snowmelt Coef (in/degF-Day) 0.06 Soil Freeze Temp (deg-F) 32.0 Snowmelt Abstraction Factor 1.00 Evapo-Trans. Calibration Factor 1.00 Growing Season Start Month 5 Growing Season End Month 10 5-Day Antecedent Rainfall + Runoff (inches) CN Antecedent Moisture Condition AMC-II AMC-III Growing Season 1.40 2.10 NonGrowing Season 0.50 1.10 Watershed Data Watershed Name 1S 2S Runoff to Device POND 1P POND 1P Infiltration to Device Watershed Area 7.23 1.03 SCS Curve Number (Pervious) 74 74 Scale Factor for Pervious Runoff Load 1 1 Indirectly Connected Imperv Fraction 0 0.126 UnSwept Impervious Fraction 0.368 0 UnSwept Depression Storage (inches) 0.02 0.02 UnSwept Imperv. Runoff Coefficient 1 1 UnSwept Scale Factor for Particle Loads 1 1 Swept Impervious Fraction 0 0 Swept Depression Storage (inches) 0.02 0.02 Swept Imperv. Runoff Coefficient 1 1 Swept Scale Factor for Particle Loads 1 1 Sweeping Frequency 0 0 Sweeping Efficiency 1 1 Sweeping Start Date (MMDD) 101 101 Sweeping Stop Date (MMDD) 1231 1231 326 Device Data Device Name POND 1PPOND 1P - FILTRATION BENCHOUTFLOW Device Type POND INF_BASIN PIPE Infiltration Outlet OUTFLOW Normal Outlet POND 1P - FILTRATION BENCH Spillway Outlet OUTFLOW OUTFLOW Particle Removal Scale Factor 1 1 Bottom Elevation (ft) 722 726 Bottom Area (acres) 0.03 0.15 Permanent Pool Area (acres) 0.11 Permanent Pool Volume (ac-ft) 0.34 Perm Pool Infilt Rate (in/hr) 0 Flood Pool Area (acres) 0.23 0.18 Flood Pool Volume (ac-ft) 0.68 0.25 Flood Pool Infilt Rate (in/hr) 0 1 Infilt Basin Void Fraction (%) 100 Detention Pond Outlet Parameters Outlet Type WEIR Outlet Orifice Diameter (in) Orifice Discharge Coef Outlet Weir Length (ft) 115 Weir Discharge Coef 3 Perforated Riser Height (ft) Number of Holes in Riser Holes Diameter Flood Pool Drain Time (hrs) Swale Parameters Length of Flow Path (ft) Slope of Flow Path % Bottom Width (ft) Side Slope (ft-v/ft-h) Maximum Depth of Flow (ft) Mannings n Constant Hydraulic Model Pipe, Splitter, Aquifer Parameter Hydraulic Res. Time (hrs) 0 Particle Data Particle File nurp50.p8p Particle Class P0% P10% P30% P50% P80% Filtration Efficiency (%) 90 100 100 100 100 Settling Velocity (ft/hr) 0 0.03 0.3 1.5 15 First Order Decay Rate (1/day) 0 0 0 0 0 2nd Order Decay (1/day-ppm) 0 0 0 0 0 Impervious Runoff Conc (ppm) 1 0 0 0 0 Pervious Runoff Conc (ppm) 1 100 100 100 200 Pervious Conc Exponent 0 1 1 1 1 Accum. Rate (lbs-ac-day) 0 1.75 1.75 1.75 3.5 Particle Removal Rate (1/day) 0 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Washoff Coefficient 0 20 20 20 20 Washoff Exponent 0 2 2 2 2 Sweeper Efficiency 0 0 0 5 15 Water Quality Component Data Component Name TSS TP TKN CU PB ZN HC Water Quality Criteria (ppm) Level 1 5 0.025 2 2 0.02 5 0.1 Level 2 10 0.05 1 0.0048 0.014 0.0362 0.5 Level 3 20 0.1 0.5 0.02 0.15 0.38 1 Content Scale Factor 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Particle Composition (mg/kg) P0% 0 99000 600000 13600 2000 64000 250000 P10% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P30% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P50% 1000000 3850 15000 340 180 1600 22500 P80% 1000000 0 0 340 180 0 22500 327 STORM SEWER DESIGN COMPUTATION SHEETSheet 1 of 1Project: RSI MARINEJob No.: 23953 James R. Hill, Inc.Location: CHANHASSEN, MNPrepared by: VUN PLANNERS / ENGINEERS / SURVEYORSDescription: Storm Sewer Comps for 10-Year Rain EventDate: 5/31/2022 2999 West County Road 42, Suite 100 Burnsville, MN 55306Pipe Type: RCP/PVC 952 / 890-6044 fax 952 / 890-6244Manning's n : 0.013 Structure No.A C C x A Σ tiQ dUPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Length Slope Dia. Q-full MH Vel.-full t- travelFrom To acres coef. C x A min. intens. c.f.s. Rim Inv. Bld Rim Inv. Depth ft. ft./ft. in. c.f.s. size ft./sec. min.Remarks1 CB-105 CBMH-104 1.40 0.50 0.70 0.70 10.0 6.1 4.29 741.30 737.803.50741.30 737.214.091180.50% 15 4.57 3.72 0.53 OK 12 CBMH-104 CBMH-103 0.44 0.70 0.31 1.01 10.5 6.0 6.03 741.30 737.214.09741.20 735.945.261261.01% 15 6.48 5.29 0.40 OK 23 CBMH-103 CBMH-102 0.53 0.70 0.37 2.13 10.9 6.0 12.75 741.20 735.745.46741.20 733.877.331261.48% 18 12.79 7.24 0.29 OK 34 CBMH-102 CBMH-101 0.71 0.70 0.50 2.63 11.2 5.8 15.34 741.20 733.677.53741.30 732.548.761131.00% 21 15.84 6.59 0.29 OK 45 CBMH-101 FES-100 0.00 0.70 0.00 3.08 11.5 5.7 17.58 741.30 727.8513.45727.50 727.500.00670.52% 27 22.38 5.63 0.20 OK 567 CB-106 CBMH-103 1.50 0.50 0.75 0.75 10.0 6.1 4.60 752.92 742.0010.92741.20 737.004.201623.09% 12 6.26 7.97 0.34 OK 189 CB-107 CBMH-101 0.90 0.50 0.45 0.45 10.0 6.1 2.76 742.86 738.864.00741.30 738.233.07631.00% 12 3.56 4.54 0.23 OK 1 328 329 Variance Request 3 of 3 – Landscape Peninsulas REQUEST FOR VARIANCE 3 of 3 – Landscape Peninsulas Variance is requested for reduced required vehicle use area landscaping requirements per Sec. 20-1181. a. Overview • The proposed development does not require parking stalls as all traffic just comes to load and unload then leaves the site. We are providing minimal drive aisle width to access the building and load buildings with trailers; therefore, we do not have space for landscape islands per the code. The landscape islands would negatively impact vehicular circulation and trailer movements onsite. b. Practical Difficulties • Typically, landscape islands are used to end cap or break up long expanses of vehicular parking stalls. Since we do not require parking stalls interior to this development all landscape islands would need to be in the drive lane which poses a practical and safety issue with the site. c. Denied Substantial Rights. • Denial of the variation would impact the ability for safe and effective truck and trailer circulation in the main drive aisle. d. Essential Elements of the Area. • The variance would not result in a use or development on the subject lot in regards to the following: 1) The acceptance of the variation will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or materially injurious to the enjoyment, use, development, or value of property or improvements permitted in the vicinity. 2) Acceptance of the variance would not alter the essential character of the locality 3) The acceptance of the variance would not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the properties and improvements in the vicinity. 4) Acceptance of the variance would not cause any increase to congestion in the public streets or have any impact on street traffic. 5) There will be no increase danger to flood or fire. 330 Variance Request 3 of 3 – Landscape Peninsulas 6) Acceptance would not unduly tax public utilities and facilities in the area 7) Acceptance will not endanger the public health or safety. 331 Memorandum To:MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner From:Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer CC: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Joe Seidl, Water Resources Engineer Charlie Burke, Public Works Operations Manager Date:8/4/2022 Re:10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard PUD and Site Plan Review – Planning Case No. 2022-04A EASEMENTS The preliminary plat provided dated 12/4/2018 and produced by James R. Hill, Inc., illustrates typical 10-foot public drainage and utility easements (DUE) along all property lines. Additional public DUEs were also provided over public utilities (only watermain at this phase) extending into the property. The location of the additional DUEs over the public water main are subject to change upon addressing the conditions associated with the public water main as discussed under the “Sanitary Sewer and Watermain” section of this report Any and all existing easements must be vacated prior to recording of the final plat. Based on Carver County property information there appears to be two parcels abutting the preliminary plat’s eastern property lines that are listed as “Parcel ID: Gap”. It is unclear if these parcels are being considered in the lot combination of the PUD, or if they are being considered a part of the adjacent lot to the west (PID #250361300). Clarification regarding the status of “Parcel ID: Gap” in conjunction with the proposed plat will be required prior to recording of the final plat from either the County or the applicant. 332 The preliminary plat abuts and gains access from Carver County right-of-way. Thus, the applicant must coordinate with Carver County regarding any additional considerations and potential conditions associated with easements for the property as well as any requirements associated with ingress/egress and construction activities such as during grading and hauling operations. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY The original existing condition survey, dated 1/28/2022 and produced by James R. Hill, Inc., required updates, including: Topographic data 100 feet beyond the property boundary Illustration of existing features that would impact the site’s ingress/egress (e.g. the full extents of Flying Cloud Drive which includes the median near the site’s entrance) Utilities on or adjacent to the property, including location, size and invert elevation of storm sewers, catch basins and manholes; location and size of water mains (including casings) and hydrants; location of gas mains, high pressure lines, fire hydrants, electric and telephone lines, and street lights. The direction, distance to, and size of such facilities shall be indicated. Wetlands Bluff impact zones Sewage treatment systems and associated conveyance systems Existing easements and associated recording document numbers Property information within 150 feet of the property’s boundary Retaining wall elevations The resubmitted existing condition survey, dated 5/6/2022, was updated to include these requirements and is in general conformance with City Ordinance. WETLANDS A study completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services in 2021 shows there are no wetlands within the project site. City records show there is a wetland/wetditch just south of the project site located in the drainage ditch along County Road 101 (Great Plains Blvd). This wetland has been classified as a manage type 2 wetland in the City’s Surface Water Management Plan. A 1992 delineation report indicates the source of water as surface water runoff and the route of outflow is a culvert to the Minnesota River. The preliminary plans submitted show grading in close proximity to the wetland which is near the proposed access to the site. Article VI, Chapter 20 of City Code describes buffer strip and setback requirements. For example a 10 to 30 foot buffer strip with an average of 20 foot width for 333 manage type 2 wetlands. There is also a 30-foot setback from the buffer strip so the building setback should be from 40 to 60 feet averaging 50 feet away from the edge of a manage type 2 wetland. The wetland buffer and wetland setback should be shown on the grading plan and staked in the field prior to construction. The preliminary plans appear meet the wetland setback requirements, however the buffer area should be staked with permanent markers and planted with native vegetation as outlined in city code. BLUFFS There is a steep slope located on the west side of the property; the bottom generally follows the 750 contour of the property and the top of the follows the 772 -774 contours. The steep area is called out in the preliminary plans as a bluff, however because this area was created from grading completed as part of a development project in 1996 it is not a natural slope and therefore does not meet the City's definition of a bluff. The Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD) also regulates steep slopes within their jurisdiction. The applicant will need to coordinate with the watershed district to confirm if the project triggers any regulations as defined in Rule F – Steep Slopes. RETAINING WALLS Preliminary plans provided indicate that retaining walls may be required for the development. These walls are shown around the northern and eastern portions of the property. Portions of the retaining walls illustrated are shown to be located within public drainage and utility easements along the eastern property lines. An encroachment agreement would be required for any retaining walls located within public easements. Portions of the retaining walls are illustrated to be either close to or directly over the eastern property line. Due to the proximity to the property line, the construction of these walls would require construction activities to occur on the abutting property. The construction of any improvements that impact or require access to abutting properties must have the appropriate right-of-entry agreements and/or temporary construction easements prior to construction operations commencing. Retaining walls over 4 feet in height shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer and shall be constructed of a durable material (smooth face concrete, masonry/mortared, railroad ties and timber are prohibited). It should be noted that the height of any retaining wall is measured from the top of the wall to the bottom of the footing (not to the top of grade adjacent to the bottom of the wall). ACCESS 334 Access to the site is currently had from Flying Cloud Drive (CSAH 61) and is located near the eastern property line. The preliminary plans indicate that the current access will remain and no additional accesses to the surrounding Carver County rights-of-way are proposed. The development will be required to construct a commercial driveway access in accordance with City Standards. Any comments or conditions by Carver County associated with impacts to their rights-of-way must be adhered to and all permits required must be obtained prior to construction activities commencing. In accordance with Section 20-1122 of City Code a turnaround is required when access is had from a state highway, county road or collector roadway. As access is being had from CSAH 61 a turnaround will be required that can adequately facilitate the turning movement of the largest anticipated design vehicle for the site or the City’s largest fire truck, whichever is greater. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The existing conditions plansheet and drainage maps included in the submittal show an existing building near the center of the property with access to Great Plains Boulevard provided by an asphalt parking area and gravel driveway. Stormwater runoff generally flows from north to south down the slope of the site where it enters a drainage swale along Flying Cloud Drive. The drainage swale conveys stormwater from west to east. Stormwater leaves the site by way of an existing 48” culvert under Flying Cloud Drive which conveys the stormwater to the South through stormwater pond Bluff Creek 9-2-1 and into Bluff Creek before ultimately outleting to the Minnesota River. The preliminary plans provided with the submittal show a significant amount of grading. The design steepens the hill on the northeast side of the site to create a flat area conducive for the four proposed buildings with access and parking. The proposed design uses a combination of drainage swales and stormwater infrastructure to collect and convey stormwater into a Best Management Practice (BMP) located on the southwest corner of the property. The design shows stormwater being conveyed from the proposed BMP to the existing swale along Flying Cloud Blvd through an outlet control structure. Any impacts to Carver County’s right-of-way must be approved and permitted by the County prior to construction activities. The overall design of the stormwater infrastructure mimics the flow path of the existing condition and acts to convey stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces through water quality BMPs. The Hydrologic and Hydraulic HydroCAD models show the site is decreasing rates leaving the site for the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm events. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction 335 Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has prepared and submitted a preliminary Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) which generally appears feasible. The SWPPP is a required submittal element for preliminary plan review. No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is developed. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements as listed in the permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub- contractors are identified, and as other conditions change. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN Currently, municipal sanitary sewer and potable water services are not available to the site. During the build-out of the Highway 101 Realignment project, which was substantially completed in 2021, public sanitary sewer mains and water mains were extended along the corridor. However, these newly extended utilities are not fully active nor ready for operation to service properties, as such the site does not have adequate public sanitary and water to fully serve the development’s needs. In 2014, a Highway 61 corridor study was conducted in response to several near and long-term infrastructure projects at the time (e.g. Highway 101 Realignment, CSAH 61 reconstruction, flood mitigation projects, etc.) which prompted the City to investigate the feasibility of extending public utilities to the southern portion of the City. The study, known as “County Road 61 Corridor Plan”, conducted by SRF in association with Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc., determined that utility extensions were feasible within the study area. The image below, taken from Figure 3.1 of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, depicts the City’s existing and planned sanitary sewer in this area (planned water system build-out generally adheres to the same areas and alignments). 336 The proposed development falls within the southcentral region of sanitary subdistrict LB-1 (the Lower Bluff Creek District). The 2014 study estimated costs and fee revenue associated with extending City utilities to the study area, along with estimated utility assessments per acre, which are shown in Tables 1 and 2. 337 With a lack of adequate city utilities in the area, the development will be required to provide private utility services (sanitary sewer and potable water) to adequately meet the needs of the development. The City has agreed to allow the development to tap into the public watermain which was extended with the Highway 101 Realignment project, but only to service the development’s fire suppression needs. At this time there is not sufficient demand along the extended watermain to supply water to the quality standards that the City requires for consumption. This is important to note because the preliminary plans provided indicate the existing well on-site is proposed to be abandoned. If the site will have any fixtures requiring the use of water other than for fire suppression needs, a private source of water supply must be used for those fixtures. The preliminary plans indicate a sanitary sewer main to be installed within the development that then connects to the public main extended within the CSAH 61 right-of-way. This connection is not approved as the public sanitary sewer is not active nor ready for operation to service properties. If the applicant desires to construct sanitary sewer services and/or mains to service the future needs of the development, the applicant will be required to concurrently extend the public sanitary sewer main along CSAH 61 right-of-way to the eastern property line and cap the service line to the development. The preliminary plans indicate tapping of the existing public watermain for fire suppression needs at the southwest corner of the property. As shown on the preliminary plans this would be infeasible as the watermain was housed in a casing at the location, and would be required to be extended further east to facilitate the connection. Regardless, the development will be required to extend the 12” C900 PVC public watermain to the eastern property line along CSAH 61 right-of- way. The extension into the site must be along or near the improved private access to allow for reasonable access for future repair and maintenance and of adequate diameter to service the needs of the development. Adequate public drainage and utility easements will be required over the public main as it extends into the site. Private fire laterals can then be tapped from the public main as necessary. The applicant and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated May 6, 2022 prepared by Joel G. Cooper, PE with James R. Hill, Inc. to fully satisfy staff concerns. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by 338 staff to ensure adherence to the most recent edition of the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates and City Ordinances. The property and potential future properties associated with this developable area will be specially assessed for the extension of the public sanitary sewer when they connect. When the property and potential future properties connect to municipal services they will also be required to pay the utility hook-up fees at the rate in effect at the time of hook-up. Lastly, prior to commencement of any utility work, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city which shall include but is not limited to the Minnesota Department of Health, Carver County, etc. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT The project site is located within the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District (LMRWD). The proposed development will exceed the one (1) acre of new impervious area and will therefore require permanent stormwater BMPs to be constructed as part of this project and maintained by the owner. The project will be subject to stormwater regulations outlined under LMRWD Rule D including rate, volume, and water quality. Based on the LMRWD’s website, a portion of the site includes Steep Slopes as defined by the LMRWD and will be required to meet LMRWD Rule F. The City of Chanhassen also regulates the design, construction, and maintenance of stormwater infrastructure. Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP), and runoff rate control for the 2, 10, and 100-year storm events. A stormwater maintenance agreement and associated operations and maintenance plan is required for all private stormwater BMPs. The LMRWD requires volume control equal to one inch of runoff from impervious surfaces. The site is proposing 2.99 acres of impervious which requires 10,852 cubic feet of volume control. The filtration bench provides 16,921 cubic feet of volume control below the outlet meeting the volume control requirement. The design of the BMP is highly dependent on soil types and infiltration rates of the underlying soils. Soil borings, infiltration testing and an associated geotechnical report will be needed to confirm the design of the stormwater BMP. No geotechnical report was included as part of the reviewed submittal. If the soil borings show onsite soils are conducive to infiltration, the BMP will need to be redesigned to allow for 339 infiltration in line with LMRWD rules. If the soil borings support the current filtration bench design, because the site is providing more volume control than is required, the project will be meeting the water quality rules. A number of comments pertaining to the P8 modeling of the site have been provided to the applicant which should be addressed to confirm the water quality treatment being provided. The Stormwater Narrative and supporting Hydrologic and Hydraulic HydroCAD models were reviewed and found to have a few inconsistencies from the plans provided such as a different amount of proposed impervious, not properly modeling the proposed filtration bench, and not including the overflow from the pond. The current modeling shows the site meets rate control requirements showing a decrease in discharge rates leaving the site from the existing condition to the proposed condition in the 2-, 10- and 100-year storm event. The applicant shall update Hydrologic and Hydraulic models based on comments from City staff and provide satisfactory models, and rate analysis confirming compliance with requirements prior to recording the final plat. As noted in Appendix H of the City’s Surface Water Management Plan dated August 2006, the City requires at least 3 feet of freeboard between a building elevation and adjacent ponding features. The site is currently meeting this freeboard requirement with respect to the proposed BMP HWL elevation of 730.44. Once the HydroCAD models have been updated, it should be confirmed the site is still in compliance with the City’s 3-foot freeboard requirement between HWL and adjacent buildings. The grading plan shows there is only 0.4 feet of vertical separation between the intermediate EOFs within the driving area and the adjacent buildings proposed first floor elevation. The grading plan should be updated to provide a minimum 1.0 feet of separation between these EOFs and the adjacent buildings as outlined in Chapter 19 of City Code. The City’s water resources engineer reviewed the preliminary plans provided with the submittal. Specific comments regarding the design of stormwater infrastructure and BMPs were provided to the applicant. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FEES In 2005 a Stipulation of Settlement (Court File No. 10-CV-05-48) between PCH Development, LLC and the City of Chanhassen was agreed to regarding the park dedication fees and surface water management fees surrounding the subdivision of the “Paws Claws and Hooves Addition” subdivision (PC #2003-04 and the property of this Conceptual PUD). The surface water management fee was reduced to $9,900.00 and was paid on 7/25/2005. The settlement agreement states, “If all or any part of the property is changed to a different principal use or further subdivided, the property shall be subject to payment of additional park dedication and surface water management fees based upon the rates in effect at that time applicable to the 340 proposed use and type of municipal approval requested.” However, as the stipulation was between the property owner and the City and was not required to be memorialized against the property, if the property owner changes from PCH Development, LLC no stormwater fees will be required. If the property is subdivided in the future, stormwater fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $9,900.00 already paid. RECOMMENDATIONS: Engineering: 1. Adequate public drainage and utility easements are required over any publicly owned and maintained water mains and will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to the recording of the final plat. 2. Any existing easements within the final plat area must be vacated prior to recording of the final plat. 3. The two parcels along the development’s eastern property lines listed with Carver County’s property information as “Parcel ID: Gap” will need to be identified appropriately prior to recording of the final plat. 4. Encroachment agreements are required of any proposed improvements within public drainage and utility easements after review and approval by the City Engineer. 5. The construction of any improvements that require access to adjacent properties shall receive a temporary construction easement or right-of-entry prior to issuance of any building permits. 6. Retaining walls over 4 feet in height shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer and shall be privately owned and maintained. 7. The development shall construct a commercial driveway access in accordance with the most recent edition of the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. 8. Any private utility needs to service the development, including sanitary sewer and potable water, will be required to be provided by the developer as the property is not serviced by adequate city utilities. 9. The proposed connection to the public sanitary sewer main is not approved. 10. The proposed water main tap to the public main shall only be used for fire suppression needs for the development. 11. The developer shall extend the 12” C900 PVC public watermain to the eastern property line along CSAH 61. 12. The water extension into the site must be along or near the improved private access to allow for reasonable access for future repair and maintenance. 13. The applicant and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated May 6, 2022 prepared by Joel G. Cooper, PE to fully satisfy all plan review comments. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff. 341 14. The property and potential future properties associated with the final plat will be specially assessed for the extension of the public sanitary sewer when they connect. 15. The property and potential future properties associated with the final plat will be required to pay utility hook-up charges at the rate in effect at the time of connection to municipal services. 16. All required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies including but not limited to the Minnesota Department of Health, Carver County Public, etc. shall be provided to the city prior to issuance of building permits. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of an approved permit from the LMRWD as part of the building permit submittal to the City. 2. The applicant must submit soil borings and a geotechnical report with the building permit submittal to the City. Any modifications to the current design based on the geotechnical findings will be reviewed with future submittals to confirm compliance with the City’s requirements. 3. The applicant must update the Hydrologic and Hydraulic models per City comments and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the building permit submittal to the City. 4. The applicant shall update P8 water quality modeling and resubmit the models in their native form to confirm the City’s water quality rule is met with the building permit submittal to the City. 5. The applicant shall update plans to provide the required freeboard from the proposed buildings and the EOF. 6. The applicant shall update plans to show wetland buffer markers and native vegetation in the wetland buffer area. 7. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for any proposed privately owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concurrently with the final plat. 8. If the property is subdivided in the future, stormwater fees will be collected at the rate in affect at the time of platting, minus the $9,900.00 already paid. 342 Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Office (952) 466-5200 | Fax (952) 466-5223 | www.co.carver.mn.us CARVER COUNTY Review comments from the July 2022 Planned Unit Development Site Plan submittal are made in blue italic font. Comments updated August 3, 2022. March 1, 2022 City of Chanhassen c/o MacKenzie Young-Walters, AICP Associate Planner 952-227-1132 mwalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Re: Development / Access Review Comments: 10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard Conceptual Planned Unit Development (PUD) located at PID#s 256010010 and 256010020 adjacent to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 101 (Great Plains Blvd.) and CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Dr.) Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development in the City of Chanhassen. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, and other official controls of the County, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval and as potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project. 1. Regarding access to the County highway a. The proposed driveway access onto CSAH 61 was built with the County’s Flying Cloud Dr. project and the proposed driveway location appears consistent with the access that was constructed. i. Information b. Provide an estimate of the maximum number of vehicles that may make a left turn into the site during an hour to evaluate the potential operational and safety risk of vehicles and any towed trailers obstructing eastbound CSAH 61 traffic. Additional improvements may be needed to mitigate any operational or safety risks that are identified. i. Applicant to provide this information c. Update: The median on CSAH 61 (Flying Cloud Dr.) is to be shifted west 60 feet to accommodate a truck and trailer to pull out of the way of traffic when making left turns into the subject site. Applicant can coordinate with Carver County Public Works with design specifics. See attachment of this change. A plan set shall be developed and signed by a licensed Engineer. This improvement shall be made at the expense of the applicant and an excavation permit will be required. 2. Regarding County highway right of way a. The property boundaries shall match the existing County highway right of way. The proposed boundary appears to match the highway right of way as modified by CR RW Plat No. 29. 343 i. Information 3. Regarding grading adjacent to the County highway a. County requests drainage calculations and data for the proposed development. Revision is likely needed regarding the outlet for the proposed stormwater treatment ponds, which is not in a good location due to the flow outlet being up gradient from the trail which is below. Drainage should be carried and directed further to the east into the roadside ditch that currently exists instead of to the west side of the development on the steep slopes and directly pointed at the trail embankment. i. Condition applies b. Confirm the proposed drainage will not create an adverse impact to the County right of way. i. Condition applies c. Proposed grading shall tie-in and be compatible with the existing ground in the County right of way. i. Condition applies d. Update: The outlet apron needs to be stabilized per design guidance from MnDOT to minimize the erosion risk. e. Update: A meeting should be set up by the applicant’s engineer with Carver County Public Works to confirm the stormwater calculations. There are questions on the calculations for the culvert along CSAH 61. 4. Regarding final approvals and required permits - a. The County will need to review and approve the final grading plans for properties adjacent to CSAH 101 and CSAH 61. A grading permit will be required for grading work within the highway right of way. i. Condition applies b. An access permit will be required for access to CSAH 61 due to this change in use and connection of the site improvements to CSAH 61. i. Condition applies. A deposit will be required to ensure work within the right of way for required median change project is to County standards. c. The technical details of any final plat, its boundaries and form(s) will need to be reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. i. Condition applies d. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility, Access, or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works: (www.co.carver.mn.us/departments/public-works/quick-links/permits). Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits. i. Condition applies 344 e. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at development expense, including costs incurred by the County. i. Information These are the County’s comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact staff noted below: Jack Johansen Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5283 jjohansen@co.carver.mn.us Angie Stenson AICP Sr. Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5273 astenson@co.carver.mn.us Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE Traffic Services Supervisor Carver County Public Works 952.466.5208 dmccormick@co.carver.mn.us 345 ? ? X=560000 X=560000 11 1075 80 85 75 80 85 155160 SURFACE FINISHED TOP OF GROUND EXISTING VPI +86.86EL. 738.27+1.00%VPI +20.30EL. 735.29-1 .75%VPI +14.84EL. 726.64-1 .75%+0.80% 200.00’ V.C. K = 78 ex = 0.64’VPC +14.84 EL. 728.39VPT +14.84 EL. 727.44729.52727.85ROUNDABOUT PROFILE SEE E-CID GRADING GRADE EXCAVATION-MUCK SELECT GRANULAR MODIFIED GRANULAR SELECT ELEV. 727.19 STA 84+52.09 LOW POINT 1.5:1727.32VPI +91.24EL. 728.85+0.80%-0.67% 200.00’ V.C. K = 136 SSD = 835’VPC +91.24 EL. 728.05VPT +91.24 EL. 728.18728.55STA. 86+81.36END PROJECT728.41STA. 86+36.34END PERMANENT CONST.75 80 85730.91729.94728.66726.68725.66724.82723.73721.89720.41719.14718.32718.25718.38718.61721.37723.43722.75723.56724.91726.95726.34726.67727.41728.00728.41728.79728.91728.97728.94728.74728.54734.40734.90735.40735.90736.40736.90737.40737.90738.10737.47736.83736.19735.55734.77733.90733.02732.15731.27730.40729.52728.65727.85727.36727.19727.33727.72728.12728.52728.9285 86 87 8885 IRON IRON 5/19/20143:51:57 PMS:\AE\C\Carvr\124268\5-final-dsgn\50-final-dsgn\40-TransHwy\plnshts\124268_cp.dgnDRAWN BY: DESIGNER: DESIGN TEAM CHECKED BY: REVISIONSNO.BY DATE ST. PAUL, MN 55110 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. PHONE: (651)490-2000119938_cp7 236 FILE NO. Lic. No. Date: CARVR 124268 CARVER COUNTY,MN. Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under Certified By: Printed Name: Licensed Professional Engineer 5/19/2014 OF 43475 CSAH 101 & CSAH 61 JASON E. OWENS CIF JEO JEO S.A.P. 194-020-010, S.A.P. 194-020-011 S.A.P. 070-701-009, S.P. 1009-24, S.A.P. 010-661-002, S.A.P. 010-701-002, 710 720 730 740 710 720 730 740 CP10 { E-CID MATCH LINE - EB STA 73+00CONSTRUCTION PLAN & PROFILE CP7 RETAINING WALL A { TRAIL RETAINING WALL A 32’18’23’32’30’18’23’32’14’14’16’16’10’ TRAIL +40 +50 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 +97 +19 1:10 16’14’ 14’12’ 1:15 +93 +76 8’ SHLD 10’ TRAIL 12’ 12’ 12’ 8’ SHLD +69 +73 1:151:10 6’ MED. +16 +26 +40 +50 SHEET ID5 INTERSECTION DETAIL FOR INFORMATION SEE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (FLYING CLOUD DR) { WB CSAH 61 (FLYING CLOUD DR) { EB CSAH 61 EB CSAH 61 STA 73+00 - 89+00 { SB CSAH 101 { NB CSAH 101 STA. 86+81.36 { EB CSAH 61 END S.A.P. 010-661-002 CONSTRUCION END PERMANENT STA. 86+36.34 EB CSAH 61 CULVERT EXISTING BR. NO. 10549 22’17’ 15’17’15’22’EX R/W TE TE TE EX R/W EX R/W D&U EASE D&U EASETE TE EX R/WPROP R/W +14 +74 +16 +26C&G B624 C&G S524 C&G B624 C&G S524 (**) 2-1/c#12 (TRACERS) F&I (**) 2-1 1/4" CONDUITS (**) 2-1/c#12 (TRACERS) F&I (**) 2-1 1/4" CONDUITS HANDHOLE (URBAN) F&I (**) FIBER OPTIC SEE SHEET CP4 MATCH LINE (FIBER OPTIC)SEE SHEET CP4 MATCH LINE (FIBER OPTIC) FROM B624 TO S524. 3 10’ TRANSITION CURB AND GUTTER (PAID FOR AS 6" CONCRETE WALK). PER MNDOT STD. PL. 7113. 1 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE APROACH NOSE SPECIFIC NOTES: END GUARDRAIL EB STA. 75+15 11010’ TRAI L10’ TRAIL =10’R14’=104’R 700 700 C&G B624 C&G B624 C&G B424 1 JEO 5/19/2014 COUNTY’S PROPOSED PROFILE CHANGED THE END OF PROJECT PROFILE TO MATCH HENNEPIN EB CSAH 61 100’ SCALE IN FEET 346 Landscaping and Tree Preservation 10500/10520 Great Plains Blvd Existing vegetation on the site consists of many pioneer tree species. These types of trees that are the first to populate a site, often after a disturbance. Common species on the site include box elder, Siberian elm, green ash, cottonwood, and hackberry. The applicant is able to save the existing trees along the north property line adjacent to the regional trail corridor which is a mix of hackberry, elm and box elder. While the elm and box elder may not be highly desirable trees they do provide nesting and habitat for birds and pollinators. Preserving these trees also helps to meet bufferyard requirements for the north property line. The applicant is proposing a native prairie seed mix along the north property line. This location is ideal for a dry prairie seed mix and will work to provide habitat on site, provided that the proper establishment of the seed is followed. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a 3- year prairie management contract to ensure the establishment of the native plants. The applicant is proposing a diverse mix of tree and shrub species but needs to incorporate 2 additional understory genera in order to meet minimum diversity as required by ordinance so that no genus has more than 10 trees in quantity. Bufferyard plantings are required along the property lines. The landscape plan shows the following proposed landscaping for the site. Required plantings Proposed plantings Bufferyard A –North prop. line, Regional Trail, 780’ 7 overstory trees 14 Understory trees 21 Shrubs 19 overstory trees - existing 0 Understory trees 46 Shrubs Bufferyard B –South prop. Line, Hwy 61, 700’ 14 overstory trees 28 understory trees 42 shrubs 11 overstory trees 23 understory trees 25 shrubs Bufferyard B –west prop. line, Hwy 101 Great Plains Blvd, 500’ 10 Overstory trees 20 Understory trees 30 Shrubs 5 Overstory trees 8 Understory trees 20 Shrubs Bufferyard A -East property line, 460’ 4 Overstory trees 9 Understory trees 13 Shrubs 4 Overstory trees 8 Understory trees 12 Shrubs 347 The applicant does not meet minimum requirements for bufferyard plantings on the south, west and east sides of the site. Staff recommends that the minimum requirements for bufferyards in these areas. The vehicular use area is required by code to have landscaping that includes islands or peninsulas for every 6,000 sq. ft. of use area as well as landscaped areas and trees in and around the parking area in order to reduce the overall heat island effect of pavement and improve aesthetics of the site. Minimum requirements for landscaping for the parking lot include 3090 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, 5 landscape islands or peninsulas, and 12 trees for the parking lot. The applicant’s proposed landscaping as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 3,090 sq. ft.0 sq. ft. Trees/parking lot 12 trees 0 trees Landscape islands or peninsulas/parking lot 5 islands/peninsulas 0 islands/peninsulas The applicant is not proposing any parking stalls and the paved areas will be used for truck and trailer movements. Landscape islands would impede safe traffic movement in the site and therefore staff supports the variance request to not install landscape islands in the vehicular use area. Staff recommends that when the use of the site changes and parking is included, then all required landscape islands and/or peninsulas be installed. Recommendations: -The applicant shall meet minimum requirements for buffer yards. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the city. -The applicant shall provide a 3-year prairie establishment and management plan for the native seed area specified on the landscape plan. -When the use of the site changes and parking is included, then all required landscape islands and/or peninsulas be installed. -Incorporate 2 additional tree understory genera to Plant Schedule in order to meet minimum diversity as required by ordinance so that no genus has more than 10 trees in quantity. - 348 349 350 351 352 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Ordinance XXX: Avienda-Consider a Request to Amend Planned Unit Development-RC File No.Item No: G.2 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts an ordinance amending the Planned Unit Development, PUD- RC for Avienda." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY Details of Requested Changes to the PUD Ordinance: 1. Adding 53 row homes between the townhomes and the apartments 2. Increasing the number of apartments from 250 to 417 3. Combine the 150-unit senior housing development to one 300-unit building at the southwest corner 4. The northerly senior housing is now a retail use 5. Plan potential locations for three to four additional drive-throughs, but does not seek approval at this time 6. The district plan may be fluid as future users are identified but consistent with the the Districts and PUD Ordinance 7. Planning Commission recommended that a region use be required changes to District #3 including 10 acres set aside for a regional uses 353 BACKGROUND The Planning Commission at their meeting on September 6, 2022 recommended approval of the PUD amendment. They included in the Findings of Fact that the City Council fully consider and value the size, location, and configuration of the gathering place as an integral part of the project. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the amendments to the Avienda PUD-RC (Ordinance #657) and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS Staff Report Development Review Application PUD Ordinance Amended Narrative Development Plan 8.2 dated September 8, 2022 Avienda Design Guidelines dated September 8, 2022 Avienda Final Plat with Outlots Chanhassen Engineering Comments updated September 1, 2022 Toole Design Updated Trip Generation Carver County Engineering Comments Email from Residents Findings of Fact and Recommendation Affidavit of Mailing Carver County comments dated September 9, 2022 354 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: August 16, 2020 CC DATE: September 12, 2022 REVIEW DEADLINE:September 13, 2022 CASE #2022-12 BY:KA LOCATION: Southwest corner ofPowers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard APPLICANT:Landform Professional Services, LLC Level 7 Development 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 4600 Kings Point Road Minneapolis, MN 55330 Minnetrista, MN 55330 PRESENT ZONING: PUD-RC 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Office or Regional Commercial ACREAGE:Approximately 118 +/-acres DENSITY:Assumes 55% of commercial and 45 % of site residential of net acreage. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A Comprehensive Plan amendment is required to permit the additional units. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The developer is requesting to amend the PUD. The zoning for the development is guided by the PUD-RC Ordinance. This report summarizes the requested changes from the developer and staff recommendations. The proposed changes will be incorporated into the PUD. At this time there are no site plans being approved. This application amends the framework for Development District and the PUD-RC (uses and development guidelines). Any proposed developments will have to come back through the city process for approval. Details of Requested Changes 1. Adding 53 row homes between the townhomes and the apartments 2. Increasing the number of apartments from 250 units to 417 units 3. Combine the two, 150-unit senior housing developments to one 300-unit building at the southwest corner PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Amending the Avienda Regional Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (PUD), Ordinance 657.” 355 City Council Avienda: Amendment to PUD September 12, 2022 Page 2 of 9 4. The northerlysenior housing is now a retail use 5. Shows potential locations for three to four additional drive-throughs (beyond the four already approved) but does not seek approval at this time 6. The district plan may be fluid as future users are identified BACKGROUND November 1, 2016: The Planning Commission recommended conceptual approval of the PUD. November 28, 2016: The City Council gave conceptual approval of the PUD. February 27, 2017: During its Work Session, the City Council reviewed the significant issues of the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR).The AUAR included traffic modeling. February 28, 2017: An open house was held. March 7, 2017: The Planning Commission held a public meeting to review the proposed update to the AUAR document. The Planning Commission forwarded their comments to the City Council. March 13, 2017: The City Council authorized publication in the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Monitor for April 3 and closed the AUAR comment period on April 17. May 8, 2017: The City Council adopted a final resolution for the updated AUAR and Mitigation Plan. May 6, 2017 and June 6, 2017: The Planning Commission held pubic hearings on the plan. June 20, 2017: The Planning Commission recommended preliminary plat approval. July 10, 2017: The City Council approved Preliminary Plat creating 17 lots, three outlots and dedication of public right-of-way for public streets; and rezoning the property zoned Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to Planned Unit Development-Regional Commercial District (PUD-RC). Design Standards: and a Conditional Use Permit to encroach into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor; Wetland Alteration Permit to 4.897 acres of permanent wetland impacts as shown in plans dated April 14, 2017 and June 13, 2017, to request to construct into the primary zone and required buffer for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor. June 25, 2018: The City approved the final plat and grading permit. April 8, 2019: The Chanhassen City Council approved the extension of the final plat and grading permit to December 31, 2019 and extinguished the final plat for Avienda but allowed for grading. December 9, 2019: The Chanhassen City Council approved the extension of the preliminary plat until June 30, 2020 and permitted grading as stated in the conditions listed below and in accordance with the preliminary plat approvals. June 30, 2020 the City Council approved the Rezoning to PUD-RC and Amended Subdivision Preliminary Plat. July 12, 2021 the City Council approved the Final Plat for Avienda creating five outlots and dedication of public right-of-way. 356 City Council Avienda: Amendment to PUD September 12, 2022 Page 3 of 9 October 25, 2021, the City Council approves the Preliminary Plat for the Subdivision of 40+ acres into 39 lots and six (6) outlots, Avienda Townhomes. Avienda Townhomes Development Plan 2020 Approved 2022 Requested 357 City Council Avienda: Amendment to PUD September 12, 2022 Page 4 of 9 Land Use by Category Category Approved Proposed Change Res (all)24.88 21.27%36.27 30.75%9.49% Com 42.95 36.71%34 28.83%-7.88% Office 12.87 11.00%10.89 9.23%-1.77% Preserve 22.53 19.26%22.53 19.10%-0.16% ROW 13.76 11.76%14.25 12.08%0.32% Total 116.99 100.00%117.94 100.00%0.00% VISION (from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan) The land use change to either Office or Regional Commercial District as a part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan was based on the City’s vision for a lifestyle center. The Comprehensive Plan states: 2.7.4 Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial Definition/Vision: A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix of retail and service uses within their boundaries. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of automobiles, lighting, and trash collection, and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme. Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Goods and Services Examples • Entertainment • Department Store • Comparison Shopping • Specialty Retail/Boutique • Restaurants • Hotels • Residential 358 City Council Avienda: Amendment to PUD September 12, 2022 Page 5 of 9 Developer’s District Master Plan 2020 Approved Plan 2022 Proposed Changes The development Master Plan identifies five distinct sub-districts within Avienda. Each of these sub-districts (outlined on the plan above) is defined by specific site development patterns and perhaps a distinctive character or image.The sub-districts complement one another as part of the overall plan.They include: The applicant’s narrative is attached. An overview of the requested changes and responses/considerations is outlined below: 1. Expand the uses permitted in the different districts to allow the developer to bring new uses like the regional recreation uses. (Section C (7)) 2. Clarify that the district boundaries are fluid in nature and can be adjusted to accommodate the uses that ultimately come to Avienda. 3. Modify Section C (6) of the ordinance to allow the option for the two approved senior housing developments (which were limited to two buildings with 150 units per building to be combined into a single building (up to 300 units) in District 3 and District 4 to accommodate a Senior Housing Project. Staff is supportive of the two senior housing developments combined into one building but the City wants to ensure a retail or entertainment use in the northwest corner. 4. Change the NW area previously shown as District 4 for senior to District 1 to accommodate additional retail. The change would have all of the frontage along Lyman Boulevard planned for retail uses. Staff is supportive of the two senior housing development combined into one but want to ensure a retail or entertainment use is in the northwest corner. 359 City Council Avienda: Amendment to PUD September 12, 2022 Page 6 of 9 5. Allow row homes in District 2 (Village Retail District) to provide another housing option in the lifestyle center. This change would require a Comprehensive plan amendment to allow the additional density. The row homes would be an urban-style townhome that meets the city’s goals of lifecycle housing. The 2020 request did not utilize the maximum density of 16 units an acre. Based in the Comprehensive Plan the maximum number of units allowed at the site is 768 units; they are requesting 809 units. If the requested changes are approved, the Comprehensive Plan could be amended to permit up to 18 units an acre, thereby permitting the additional 41 units. Revising the number of units in the apartment from 250 units to 417 units. The acreage now attributed to residential increases from 28.88 acres to 36.27 acres. The increase in land dedicated to housing reduces the land available for retail/entertainment use. 6. The applicant has stated that the retail environment has dramatically changed and will continue to change. They believe that there is increased market demand for drive- through locations. The approved plans allow for a total of four drive-throughs. The plans depict an additional 3-4 drive though locations for marketing purposes. No additional approvals are being sought or granted with this amendment. The developer is advising they may make future requests based on uses/tenants. The PUD as approved allows for two drive- throughs north of Bluff Creek Boulevard for a grocery, pharmacy, or bank and two south of Bluff Creek Boulevard likely for coffee or similar type use. 7. The developer has submitted an updated Trip Generation. This study states that the proposed land use would experience a decrease in anticipated traffic volumes. (Attached) 8. Entertainment Use.The plans show a reduction amount of entertainment use. The movie theater use (60,000 sq. ft.) in District 2 is eliminated based on current market conditions. To ensure that an entertainment use(s) is built as part of the development, Staff is proposing a requirement for a minimum square footage of 25,000 square feet of entertainment in Districts 2 and/or 3. The developer has indicated agreement with this condition. 9.Based on the input for a Regional draw from the Planning Commission the District # 3 has been modified to state: Mixed Use - 10 acres or approximately 60 percent of the area in District 3 shall be developed as amusement/recreation/entertainment use. These uses include golf entertainment, hockey rinks, indoor amusement arcades, convention/ performance center. The principal amusement/recreation/ entertainment use shall be constructed prior to the approval of any accessory uses; hotel, retail/restaurant, carwash, or office use. The developer has committed to working with the city to develop a public-private recreation/entertainment partnership on the SE corner of the site (approx. 16 acres). The ordinance language for District 3 includes a requirement for 10 acres of amusement/entertainment/recreation, which assures the city that other uses are not entitled while we work together on this possibility. 360 City Council Avienda: Amendment to PUD September 12, 2022 Page 7 of 9 The city’s and developer’s understanding is that if the public-private partnership is not successful, the developer will apply for a PUD Amendment that would allow them to move forward with the other described uses, reverting to a development plan more like what is shown in Development Plan 8.1 2020 Plan 2022 Plan 10. Open Space/Plaza. The total area and configuration have changed. See above for depictions. Developer will provide total square footage comparison at the meeting. The proposed plaza will be privately owned, programmed, and maintained. The intent is to have 361 City Council Avienda: Amendment to PUD September 12, 2022 Page 8 of 9 shared space for the development and the retail/restaurants around the plaza with programming and use that is open to the public. 11. Parking.A significant amount of the parking is on now the south side of Bluff Creek Boulevard serving the entertainment retail area to the north. The Planning Commission may consider/discuss the impact on the walkability of the area. 12. Intent.The Planning Commission may consider/discuss if the revised plan meets the intent of the Regional Commercial/Lifestyle Center. Development Master Plan Revised Districts Proposed changes in uses are provided in the attached PUD Ordinance. District 1 -Retail -Provides a location for larger-scale in-line and stand-alone retail and entertainment uses. The district has been expanded to include the area that was intended for 150 units of senior housing. District 2 -The Village -Provides the broadest variety,highest density,and greatest intensity of development,encouraging both vertical and horizontal mixed-use. Comprehensive Plan Amendment would allow up to 18 units per acre and includes 417 apartments and 58 row homes. The row homes provide a transition between the low- density townhomes and the apartments while increasing the land area for housing and total number of units.A minimum of 25,000 of entertainment use shall be included in this district, some commons/public space and 2 seated restaurants dining (not fast casual or drive through). District 3 - Mixed Use - Provides a location for smaller-scale retail, service, and other auto- oriented uses as well as hotels and medical/technology-related uses. The District area has been reduced to accommodate the senior housing (300 units) in one building. A hotel and office use as well as two drive-through uses are in this District. A significant amount of the overall parking is in this District. A full-service car wash is proposed to be added as a permitted use in this district. Mixed Use - 10 acres or approximately 60 percent of the area in District 3 shall be developed as amusement/recreation/entertainment use. These uses include golf entertainment, hockey rinks, indoor amusement arcades, convention/ performance center. The principal amusement/recreation/ entertainment use shall be constructed prior to the approval of any accessory uses; hotel, retail/restaurant, carwash, or office use. District 4 -Multi-Family-Provides opportunities for high-density senior or rental apartments.This District has been expanded to have all the senior housing, 300 units, at one location. District 5 – Low-Density Residential - Provides opportunities for small lothomes.Includes 39 townhomes that have received preliminary plat approval. 362 City Council Avienda: Amendment to PUD September 12, 2022 Page 9 of 9 RECOMMENDATION The City Council recommends approval of the amendments to the Avienda PUD-RC (Ordinance #657) and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS Development Review Application PUD Ordinance Narrative Development Plan 8.2 dated September 8, 2022 Avienda Design Guidelines dated September 8, 2022 Chanhassen Engineering Comments updated September 1, 2022 Toole Design Updated Trip Generation Carver County Engineering Comments Email from Residents Findings of Fact and Recommendation Affidavit of Mailing g:\plan\2017 planning cases\17-10 avienda preliminary plat & pud\2022 amended avienda pud\cc staff report 9.12.22.doc 363 364 Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant lnformation Name Landlorm Prolossional Services, LLC Contact:Ken t.e I indehl (612) 638-0225Address:105 S slh Avenue, Suite 513 Phone: City/Statezip: Email: Minnoapolb, MN 55401 Kl-indahl@Landlotm.n€t Cell:(612) 29G.8102 Fax: Signature . Kendra Lindahl, AICP ffi,?,ii*ffi'*Date:7t15t2. PROPERTY OWI{ER: ln signing this application, l, as prop€rty ownsr, have tull legal capacity to, and heleby do, auttorize ne ning ot tris afotidtion. lunderstand lhat conditions of approval are binding and_agr€o to be bound by lhose conOitions, suUje& only to ihe right to obiect at the hearings or during lhe appoal port ds' I will k6€p mysef infomsd of G O""Otin"" t& *bniission of -materiatlnd tre progress of this applicaton. I turther unde6tand that additonal f€€s may L" "ford for -"sulting fees, foasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any aulho.lza$on to proceed with lhe study. icertify that the i;fomation and exhlbils submitted aro tus and conec't' Name:Level 7 Development LLC Contact: Phon6: Bahram Akradi ls52lw74nAddress:4600 Kings Point Road city/statezip:Minnetrista, MN 55331 Cell: Fax: (612181z-',t212 Email Signature:Date: PRqTECT ENGINEER (if aPPlbable) Stev€n Sabraski (612) 638{2€ Iandlorm Prolessional Servic€s' LLC Contact: Phone:IOS S sth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Cell: Fax:Email:SSabraski @ Landform.nst Who ahould racslve coPies of staff rePorts? !tr Email Email Email Email E Mailod Papsr CoPY E Mailed Pap€r copy E Mailed Paper CoPY fl Mail€d PaP€r CoPY Nam6:Mark Nordland, Nordland Partnors Property Owner Vla: Applicaril Vta: Engine€r Vb: Ottq' Ma: Addrass: city/staterzip This application must be comPlet6d in full and must be aoplicable City Odinanc€ provisions. Bofore filing this airi confer witr me Planning Departrnent to determine acco.npanied by all information and plans tBquirsd by.. applicition, refer to the appropriate ApPlicatDn Cheddist thC specific ordinanco and aPplicable proceduEl aoolication shall b€ made lvithin 15 businsss da)'s of aPdication submittal A ;h;ll b€ mailed to the applicant within 15 busin6ss days of application'A determination of completoness of the writtsn notico of application deficiencies r€quirsments and fsss tf Section 4: Notification lnformation INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT device. PRINT FORM and deliver : Complete all necessary lorm fields' !o city along wilh t€quired do€uments copy to the city for Procossing.sAvE FOnu then selecl SAVE FORM and p€yment. SUBMIT PRINT FORII to save a coPY to ),our FoRM to s€nd a digital SUB IT FOR tr!Email:mnord @ nord rs.com APPUCANT OTHER THAN PROPERW OWNER: ln signing this application, I, as applicant, repressnt to have obtain€d authorization frcm the pmperty ownor to file this applicalion. I agre€ to b€ bound by conditions of approval, subject only to th6 right to objeci at the hearings on the applicatbn or during the appeal p€riod. lf this application has not b6en signed by lho prop€rty owner, I havs attach€d soparate documentation of full legal capadty to file th€ application. This application should be process€d in my name and I am the party whom the City should contac{ regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep mlrsef infomed of the deadlin€s for subrnission of mawid and ths Progross of this apPlication. I further understand that additionalfs€s may b€ chargpd for consulting feos, feasibility studies, etc. with an €stimate Prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and conec't. Name: Address: City/Statezip: 'Othor Contact lnformrtlon: tr Dtr D 365 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 657 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is amended by rezoning the following described propertybelow from Agricultural Estate District, A-2, to PUD Regional Commercial Avienda. Legal Description THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (S 1/2 OF SW 1/4), SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING 2 DESCRIBED TRACTS: LINE 1. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23; THENCE RUNNING NORTH ON SECTION LINE 30 FEET; THENCE IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION, 30 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE WEST 30 FEET TO SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, BEING A THREE CORNERED PIECE IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23; AND 2. THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, BOTH IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHICH LIES EASTERLY OF LINE 2 DESCRIBED BELOW. LINE 2. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE RUNNING WEST ON AN AZIMUTH OF 271 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 13 SECONDS ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1634.23 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 24 SECONDS FOR 500.11 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 91 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 13 SECONDS FOR 1173.46 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 29 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 18 SECONDS FOR 152.11 TO A POINT; THENCE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 352 DEGREES, 57 MINUTES 23 SECONDS FOR 709.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 91 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 02 SECONDS ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 475.37 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THERE TERMINATING. 366 Page | 2 ABSTRACT TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1 THE NORTH 420.00 FEET OF THE EAST 414.86 FEET OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PARCEL 2 THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA EXCEPT FOR THE SOUTH 658.24 FEET THEREOF; AND ALSO EXCEPT THE NORTH 420.00 FEET OF THE EAST 414.86 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL 3 THE SOUTH 658.24 FEET OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116, RANGE 23, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA. TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4) OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH OF RANGE 23 WEST, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA, EXCEPT THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (NE1/4 OF SW1/4) OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH, RANGE 23 WEST, SHOWN AS PARCEL 64 ON MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 10-19, FILED 10-19-2004 AS DOCUMENT NO. 39930. DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS A. Intent The use of Planned Unit Developments (PUD) for regional/lifestyle center commercial purposes should result in a reasonable and verifiable exchange between the city and the developer. This district is intended to provide for the development of regional and community scale integrated retail, office, business services, personal services, and services to the traveling public near freeway interchanges. It shall strive to create a self-sustaining pattern of land uses with cultural, employment, entertainment, housing, shopping, and social components. The regional/lifestyle center commercial district is a mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market. The physical environment emphasizes an attractive, comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors. It shall be designed to serve pedestrian and mass transit users as well as automobile traffic. Centers of this type, generally, have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity of mixed retail and service uses. Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts. Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading, parking of 367 Page | 3 automobiles, lighting, and trash collection, and surrounding residential uses. Such centers shall be designed with one theme, similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme, but shall avoid monotony in design and visual appearance. Vehicle and pedestrian access are coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. B. Design Standards Unless otherwise provided in the PUD, the design standards shall follow the Chanhassen City Code Chapter 20, Article VIII Division 1. 20-509. - STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR REGIONAL/LIFESTYLE CENTER COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS and Article XXIII, DIVISION 7. - DESIGN STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE-INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS. Applies to District 1, 2 and 3. Chapter 20 DIVISION 9. - DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS and the Avienda Development Design Guidelines. Applies to Districts 4 and 5. September 8, 2022 368 Page | 4 The Master Plan identifies five distinct districts within Avienda. Each of these districts (outlined on the plan below)is defined by specific site development patterns and perhaps a distinctive character or image.The sub-districts complement one another as part of the overall plan.The districts are shown on the attached District Map above. They include: District 1 - Retail – provides a location for larger-scale in-line and stand-alone retail entertainment uses.Could also include a 150-unit housing in the north west corner. District 2 - The Village – provides the broadest variety, highest density, and greatest intensity of development, encouraging both vertical and horizontal mixed use.Including 53 rowhomes and up to 417 Apartments, with a minimum of 25,000 square feet of entertainment. Common/public space shall be included in this district as well as two seated restaurants in addition to other fast casual restaurants. District 3 Mixed Use - 10 acres or approximately 60 percent of the area in District 3 shall be developed as amusement/recreation/entertainment use. These uses include golf entertainment, hockey rinks, indoor amusement arcades, convention/ performance center. The principal amusement/recreation/ entertainment use shall be constructed prior to the approval of any accessory uses; hotel, retail/restaurant, carwash, or office use. Sub-District 4 - Multi-Family – provides opportunities for high density senior or rental apartments.Includes up to 300 Senior Housing units Sub-District 5 - Low Density Residential – provides opportunities for small lot homes. Includes 39 townhomes that have received preliminary plat approval. C. Development Plans and Regulations The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which are on file with the city, and which are incorporated herein: 1.Final Plat dated October 28, 2021 2.Development Plan DP8.2 dated September 8, 2022 3.Avienda Design Guidelines updated September 8, 2022 Permitted Uses 1.Entertainment: Amusement/recreation/entertainment use or substantially similar as reviewed by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Community Development Director. 2.Retail sales: a. Department stores not to exceed 25,000 square feet per store, stores that carry an assortment of merchandise from all the other categories. Such establishments may include but are not limited to department stores, discount stores, and similar establishments. b. Supermarkets and other food and grocery stores such as butcher shops and fish markets, fruit and vegetable markets, dairy products stores, candy, nut, and confectionery stores and retail bakeries not to exceed a total of 98,000 square feet. c. Apparel and accessory stores not to exceed 20,000 square feet per store. 369 Page | 5 d. Home furnishing stores selling interior decorating supplies, such as paint, light fixtures, and décor. Such stores may not exceed 40,000 square feet for any single store. e. Clothing and apparel stores, including shoes, jewelry, accessories, etc. f. Drug stores and pharmacies. g. One home and furniture store which includes furniture store, home improvement center, electronic store, appliance store, and similar establishments not to exceed 50,000 square feet. h. Farmers market. 3.Hospitality and food service establishments including: a. Bars and taverns. b. Cafes, delicatessens, food catering establishments. c. Coffee shops and cafes. d. Patio/al fresco dining facilities; Accessory to a principal use. e. Restaurants. 4.Hotels: a. One hotel is permitted in the Mixed-Use District. 5.Services: a. Personal Services i. Professional offices: banking, insurance, legal services, and real estate, etc. ii. Financial institutions. iii. Health and recreation clubs, industries, and services. iv. Health services: Offices of doctors, dentists, optometrists, etc. v. Dry cleaning, laundry, and garment services. b. One daycare center, childcare centers, preschools and Montessori school, not to exceed a total of 16,000 square feet for all such uses. 6.Housing: Residential development in the regional/lifestyle center commercial PUD may only occur in multiple-family dwellings. a.Senior housing developments are limited to two sites and are not to exceed 150 units per building. Senior housing (55 Plus) includes owner, rental or service enriched. b.Low Density Residential homes, District 5, shall be a Density of 3-6 units an acre and can include detached townhomes and twin homes. c.Fifty-three (53) rowhomes density of 8 units an acre in part of District 2. d.Apartments units with number of 417. e.The total number of housing units in the PUD shall not exceed 768. 7.Other uses: a. Retail businesses or service establishments that generally provide commodities or services and that are judged by the Community Development Director (1) to be similar in character and operation to the permitted uses described above; (2) to be closely complementary and to enhance the permitted uses; and (3) to be compatible with the intent and purposes of the Avienda Village Regional Lifestyle Center PUD. b. Drive-through accessory to a permitted use. (A maximum of four shall be permitted in Avienda.In District 1 the two permitted drive-throughs can be associated with the 370 Page | 6 supermarket grocery or pharmacy or bank. In addition,two drive-throughs in District 3 the Mixed-Use District and includes a full service car wash.) 8. Prohibited Uses a. Auto related including gas stations, tires, repair etc. except for one full-service car wash in District 3. a. Truck, motorcycles, boats, etc. sales. b. Club warehouse including wholesale. c.Gaming Establishments 9. Other comparable or superior materials may be approved by the DRC and the Community Development Director. D. Minimum Setbacks Building setbacks shall follow Chapter 20, Article VIII Division 1. 20-509. - STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR REGIONAL/LIFESTYLE CENTER COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS. Setbacks may be waived by the City Council when it is demonstrated that environmental protection and design will be enhanced. E. Development Site Coverage and Building Height 1. The PUD standard for hard surface coverage is 70% for the overall development. Individual lots may exceed this threshold. 2. More than one (1) principal structure may be placed on one (1) platted lot. 3. The maximum building height shall be: a. Retail District - 1 story b. Village District Apartment - 5 stories (excluding underground parking) Retail - 1 story Restaurants - 1 story Entertainment - 2 story c. Mixed Use District Hotel - 3 stories (excluding underground parking) Retail - 1 story Offices - 3 stories (excluding underground parking) d. Multi-family District –the combined senior housing shall not exceed five (5) stories in height. e. Low Density Housing District - 35 feet F. Parking Requirements 1. Parking shall follow Chanhassen City Code ARTICLE XXIV. - OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING. 2. There is no minimum parking setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. 371 Page | 7 3. Code Drive-Through Facilities. Drive-throughs must comply with the standard of the City Code 20-963 and where appropriate, the city and developer may prepare a vehicle stacking study to determine whether more of less stacking shall be required for a particular use. G. Landscaping Plan An overall landscaping plan is required. The plan shall contain the following: 1. Boulevard plantings. Located in front yards shall require a mix of over-story trees and other plantings consistent with the site. Landscaped berms shall be provided to screen the site from major roadways, railroads, and less intensive land uses. In place of mass grading for building pads and roads, stone or decorative block retaining walls shall be employed as required to preserve mature trees and the site's natural topography. 2. Exterior landscaping and double-fronted lots. Landscaped berms shall be provided to buffer the site and lots from major roadways, railroads, and less intensive uses. Similar measures shall be provided for double-fronted lots. Where necessary to accommodate this landscaping, additional lot depth may be required. 3. Foundation and yard plantings. A minimum budget or plan for foundation plants shall be established and approved by the City. As each parcel is developed in the PUD, the builder shall be required to install plant materials meeting or exceeding the required budget or prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy or provide financial guarantees acceptable to the City. 4. Tree preservation. Tree preservation is a primary goal of the PUD. A detailed tree survey should be prepared during the design of the PUD and the plans should be developed to maximize tree preservation. 5.No fences shall be permitted between the required landscape buffer and arterial and collector roads. H. Signage 372 Page | 8 The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business’s ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet the city's goals: 1. Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service. 2. Preserve and promote civic beauty and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination. 3. Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards. 4. Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed, and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists. 5. Preserve and protect property values. 6. Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures. 7. Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. 8. All signs shall comply with the city sign ordinance ARTICLE XXVI. – SIGNS unless otherwise permitted in this document. 1. Project Identification Sign A Six project identification signs shall be permitted for the development. The location of the Project Identification signs shall be as follows: a. Southwest and southeast of the intersection of Sunset Trail and Lyman Boulevard. b. Southwest of the intersection of Powers and Lyman Boulevards. c. Northwest and southwest of the intersection of Powers and Bluff Creek Boulevards. d. The most southeasterly corner of the development facing the Highway 212. The design and dimensions of the sign shall be identical throughout the development with exception of the larger sign facing south on to Highway 212. 373 Page | 9 2. Off-Premise Directory Sign B Three off-premise directory signs shall be permitted for the development. The location of the off- premise directory signs shall be as follows: Southeast of the intersection of Avienda Parkway and Sunset Trail. Northwest and southwest of the intersection of Bluff Creek Boulevard and Sunset Trail. The sign architectural structure shall not exceed 19 feet in height and shall be built in accordance with the dimensions and design shown and labeled below. 1. The individual tenant sign panel area shall not exceed eight (8) square feet, six (6) feet wide and 1’ 4” high, no more than three panels per off-premise directional sign. 2. The overall sign area shall not exceed 58 square feet. 3. The sign shall be located outside of the sight triangle and shall not interfere with the driver’s intersection sight distance. 4. The sign shall maintain a minimum of 10 feet from the back of the curb. 374 Page | 10 5. The sign shall maintain a 1.5-foot separation from trails/sidewalks. 6. The sign shall not interfere with snow removal operations. 7. The sign shall only include the names and logos of the businesses. 8. The sign design shall compliment the design and materials of the proposed buildings. Project identification sign area shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight (8) feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line and be located outside the sight distance triangle. 3. Monument Sign C a. Each lot shall be permitted one monument sign. One monument sign shall be permitted per lot with the exception of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2. These signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than five (5) feet in height. If more than one building is on a lot, the sign must be shared. b. All monument signs shall maintain a uniform architectural design that complements the architecture of the buildings. c. These signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the property line and be located outside the sight triangle. d. All monument signs shall face the internal streets (Avienda Parkway and Bluff Creek Boulevard). 375 Page | 11 4. Wayfinding Signs D Wayfinding signs shall be permitted along the internal street located within Lots 1 and 2, Block 5. a. The sign shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height. b. The sign area shall not exceed 32 square feet. c. The sign shall be located outside of the sight triangle and shall not interfere with the driver’s intersection sight distance. d. The sign shall maintain a minimum of 10 feet from the back of the curb. e. The sign shall maintain a 1.5-foot separation from trails and sidewalks. f. The sign shall not be illuminated. g. The sign shall not interfere with snow removal operations. h. The sign lettering shall not exceed six inches and shall have a uniform style. i. The sign shall only include the names and logos of the businesses and a directional arrow. j. The sign design shall compliment the design and materials of the proposed building. k. The sign shall not obstruct drivers’ views of any city-owned street signage or railroad signage. l. The sign will be owned and maintained by the developer. m. The applicant shall construct the sign. 376 Page | 12 5. Wall Signs a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend above parapet height. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, ortranslucent facing. b. Second story illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site, are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant’s proper name and major product, or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems, and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 30% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. d. Wall signs are limited to two elevations per building unless the area of square footage exceeds 25,000 or above in a single use. e. Single tenant buildings shall be permitted wall signs on two elevations only unless the area of square footage exceeds 25,000 or above in a single use. The size of the sign shall be based on Table 1. f. Halo Lit signs are permitted consistent with the wall area criteria, including maximum nits and only white. 377 Page | 13 6. Projecting Sign (Wall) a. Shall be limited to the Village Retail District. b. Sign area shall not exceed two (2) square feet and not project more than two (2) feet from the building. 7. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two (2) feet. f. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. g. Flags and banners which are torn or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. 8. Building Directory a. In multi-tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. 9. On-Premise Directional Signs a. On-premise signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public right-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The City Council may allow additional signs in situations where access is confusing, or traffic safety could be jeopardized. 378 Page | 14 b. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. c. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional, and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. 10. Prohibited Signs a. Pylon signs. b. Back lit awnings. c. Window signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area. d. Menu signs. e. Signs on roofs, dormers, and balconies. f. Billboards. g. Interchangeable letter boards or panels. h. Flashing signs. 11. Sign Design and Permit Requirements a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the City’s sign ordinance for the neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the “street” front and primary parking lot front of each building. I. Public Realm, Streetscape The site development, streetscape character, building placement, pedestrian realm, material expression and color, stormwater utilization, building interest, lighting and walking paths shall be consistent with the Avienda Development Guidelines Dated September 8, 2022. J. Engineering Conditions 1. The applicant shall update the traffic analysis completed for the 2016 AUAR Update based on the approved land uses for the development. 2. Each subsequent plat and/or site plan will be required to complete a Traffic Impact Study for the abutting local road network to identify capacity deficiencies at affected intersections and to help identify feasible solutions to identified deficiencies. This shall also include; an assessment of internal circulation for vehicles and pedestrians; the interface between public and private streets and trails and their respective maintenance operations; and emergency service access and circulation. 3. The access point east of the most eastern round-a-bout on Bluff Creek Boulevard, as depicted in Development Plan 8.1 dated July 15, 2022, is not approved. 379 Page | 15 4. An updated capacity analysis shall be provided based on the approved land uses to determine if the municipal utilities to service the development are adequate. PASSED AND ADOPTED bythe Chanhassen City Council this the day of September 12, 2022. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) g:\plan\2017 planning cases\17-10 avienda preliminary plat & pud\amended pud and concept 2020\pud ordinance amended 2020.doc 380 Narrative Avienda PUD Amendment Prepared for: Level 7 Development, LLC July 15, 2022 SUBMITTED TO City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 PREPARED BY Landform Professional Services, LLC 105 5th Ave S, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC 381 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Amendment Request .................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Contact Information ...................................................................................................................................... 3 382 Avienda, Chanhassen, MN July 15, 2022 SCD1400.LEV.003 1 Introduction On behalf of Level 7 Development, LLC, Landform is pleased to submit this application for an amendment to the Avienda PUD to allow us to better respond to demand in the evolving marketplace and create the mixed use regional/lifestyle center envisioned for our site. We have been working with staff to discuss the proposed modifications that were presented at the June 27th Council Work Session and look forward to approval of the PUD modifications. We have prepared an updated development plan (DP 8.1) and district plan (below) that show the current master plan concept. We are very excited about the changes proposed and the development planned. Figure 1: July 15, 2022 district map Amendment Request Our proposal remains consistent with the Comprehensive Plan goal to create a regional destination with a walkable commercial core, residential and office uses. The five districts in the previous master plan approvals remain unchanged with high-quality building architecture, streetscape and amenities as a foundation. Avienda will provide places to dine, converge and socialize around an active open space area. The development team is continuing to refine the details and we have provided renderings to show how this village center could be programmed. The mixed use development will offer a variety of retail, restaurant, office, entertainment and housing options. 383 Avienda, Chanhassen, MN July 15, 2022 SCD1400.LEV.003 2 We have been working with a variety of users who have expressed interest in Avienda, including some recreational uses that were not previously anticipated. We are requesting some modification to the PUD to allow us to quickly respond to bring quality uses to the project. Specifically, we ask for the following: 1. Expand the uses permitted in the different districts to allow us to bring new uses like the regional recreation user that we discussed at the Council work session. This could likely be addressed in Section C (7) of the PUD ordinance. 2. Clarify that the district boundaries are fluid in nature and can be adjusted to accommodate the users that ultimately come to Avienda. 3. Modify Section C (6) of the ordinance to allow the option for the two approved senior housing developments (which were limited to two buildings with 150 units per building) to be combined into a single building (up to 300 units) in District 4 (Multi-Family Housing District). We have prepared a new district plan that shifts the boundary between District 3 and District 4 to accommodate a senior housing product. 4. We would proposed to change the NW area previously shown as District 4 for senior housing to District 1 to accommodate additional retail. With this change, all of the land along Lyman Boulevard would now be planned for retail uses. 5. Allow row homes in District 2 (Village Retail District) to provide another housing option in this lifestyle center. This may require a modification of the language in Section C (6) and Section E.3.b of the ordinance, but remains consistent with the urban core concept. These rowhomes would be an urban-style townhome that meets the City’s goal of providing lifecycle housing options by providing a housing option that is not currently available. The density of the rowhomes will support the commercial uses in Avienda as well. 6. While we don’t believe it requires a change to the PUD, we ask for the ability to construct a larger apartment in District 2 (Village Retail District) than previously shown. We are working with developers to provide a high-amenity housing product with first floor retail/office space. 7. In the post-COVID era the retail environment has changed dramatically and will continue to change. One of the primary outcomes was a desire for more drive-through services. We ask that the PUD allow us to offer additional opportunities for businesses to provide a drive-through option by modifying Section C (7)b of the ordinance. When the project was first proposed in 2015, we noted that a project of this size would continue to evolve. The “Avienda Design Guidelines” we created and the City approved will ensure that Avienda be developed as a high- quality lifestyle center as envisioned. Summary We respectfully request approval of the requested PUD amendment and look forward to working with staff to finalize the language to ensure a viable mixed-use lifestyle center on the Avienda site. 384 Avienda, Chanhassen, MN July 15, 2022 SCD1400.LEV.003 3 Contact Information This document was prepared by: Kendra Lindahl, AICP Landform 105 South Fifth Avenue, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Any additional questions regarding this application can be directed to Kendra Lindahl at klindahl@landform.net or 612.638.0225. 385 30' BUILDING SETBACK30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK20' PARKING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACK20' PARKING SETBACK 10' PARKING SETBACK US Hwy 212Lyman Boulevard Powers BoulevardBluff Creek BoulevardB e t h e s d a C i r c l e Lyman Boulvevard River Rock Drive NJersey Way RIVER ROC K D R S Degler Circle Sunset Tra i l Mills Drive Jeurissen LaneOUTLOT E OUTLOT A OUTLOT C 73,500 s.f. RETAIL RETAIL RETAIL 10,000 S.F. 35,000 S.F. RETAIL RETAIL ANCHOR RETAIL 8,000 S.F. RETAIL 3,000 S.F. 6,000 S.F. 8,000 S.F. 5,000 S.F. 15,000 S.F. 6,000 S.F. 7,000 S.F. RETAIL RETAIL REST REST 13,000 S.F. SENIOR 30,000 S.F. RETAIL CHILD CARE 10,000 S.F. REST 10,000 S.F. 8,000 S.F. RETAIL 8,000 S.F. RETAIL 7,000 S.F. REST 125,840 S.F. x 4 STORIES APARTMENTS Powers BoulevardBluff Creek Boulevard Avienda Parkway R/W R/W A D F G H I J K P PR 1 PR 2 30 115 76 67 213 O 869 36 47 168 23 70 82 85 108 131 R/W L M N R/W R/W Mills Drive B C E R/W R Q R/W Landform and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.R R in collaboration with: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT NORDLAND PARTNERS · RSP ARCHITECTS ESG ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN AVIENDA · Chanhassen, MN Regional Map Legend Stall Future Traffic Signal Existing Traffic Signal Stall Count Public Right Of Way Regional Commercial Future Development Area High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Preservation Ponding NORTH 0 150 300 Wetland and Buffer PR R/W 12 494 10 394 169 5 169 55 62 100 62 MISSISSIPPIRIVERBLOOMINGTON MINNEAPOLIS 35W SITE 94 94 694 35W 35W 35 35E 494 494 94 94 35W 212 169 169 100 12 MINNESOTA RIVER CHANHASSEN MAPLE GROVE DP8.2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 8.2 SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 Development Data Section Gross Area (Acres) Net Developable Area (Acres) Building Area (S.F.) Parking Stalls Units/ Beds Parking Ratio (Stalls per 1,000 S.F. or per Unit) 1.91 1.91 6,000 36 6.0 1.66 1.66 10,000 47 4.7 3.76 3.76 35,000 168 4.8 2.26 2.26 10,000 23 2.3 1.27 1.27 13,000 70 5.4 1.75 1.75 15,000 82 5.5 1.46 1.46 5,000 85 17.0 1.48 1.48 6,000 76 12.7 1.62 1.62 7,000 67 9.6 1.06 1.06 7,000 30 4.3 6.10 6.10 45,000 239 5.3 6.60 6.60 93,227 n/a 53 2.74 2.74 24,632 n/a 8 9.27 7.35 95,449 n/a 31 12.51 12.51 461,089 869 417 4.48 4.45 30,000 115 3.8 7.07 7.07 73,524 213 300 1.2 16.11 16.11 n/a n/a 14.25 0.00 n/a n/a 20.87 0.00 n/a n/a 1.66 0.00 n/a n/a Total 119.89 81.16 936,921 2,120 809 n/a A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P PR 1 R/W PR 2 Q R Notes Development plan shown for schematic purposes only and subject to change. *Total maximum housing units allowed = 768 * 386 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES August 2022 387 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Version: 2020 May 1 Contents Overview— 5 Introduction To Design Guidelines Application Implied Responsibility Part One: Overall— 7 Overview Context— 8 Overview Recommendations Objectives Street Hierarchy— 9 Overview Recommendations Streetscape— 10 Overview Recommendations Objectives Street Lights Parking— 12 Overview Recommendations Objectives Minimum Standards Loading Areas Architecture — 13 Overview Signage— 14 Overview Objectives Definitions Standards Stormwater Management— 19 Overview Objectives Recommendations Public Spaces— 20 Overview Recommendations Objectives Part Two: District Guidelines— 22 Overview Public Realm/Streetscape Plazas Sub-District 1 - Retail — 24 Public Realm/Streetscape Site Development Architectural Character Sub-District 2 - Village Retail— 25 Public Realm / Streetscape Architectural Character Signage Streetscape Character Gathering Space - Live / Relax Gathering Space - Work/Play Sub-District 3 - Mixed Use — 37 Public Realm / Streetscape Architectural Character Sub-District 4 - Multi-Family Housing— 38 Public Realm/Streetscape Site Development Architectural Guidelines Sub-District 5 - Low Density Housing— 39 Public Realm/Streetscape Site Development 388 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Introduction – 5 Purpose These guidelines set basic parameters, describe preferences and illustrate design intent. They serve as a framework within which creative design can and should occur. There is no one prescribed solution, but many options that can meet the basic requirements and intent of this document. Application The format and content of these guidelines are specifically tailored for use as a reference workbook that is organized into two parts. The first part outlines issues and recommendations that apply to the entire project area. The second section highlights specific guidelines that apply to each sub-district. Implied Responsibility All participants in the development of this project area must recognize the local and community impacts of this project and the various systems that play an important role. Each building must fit within the context of the entire plan. Individual projects must complement, not compete with, adjacent development in terms of public space, walk and trail connections, stormwater management solutions, street layout, parking strategies, land use mix and building design. Projects in this development will also need to comply with City of Chanhassen planned unit development (PUD) standards. Overview Avienda (Pronounced: Ah-vee-EN-da) is a district with “elegant vitality”, fulfilling the City of Chanhassen’s vision to become one of the region’s most vibrant, prosperous communities. Located at the confluence of Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard, Avienda offers a desirable, diverse shopping and lifestyle destination with convenient access. As a gateway to the City of Chanhassen, development in Avienda should blend the best of residential, retail, office, medical and hospitality. It should support high quality, attractive design that is compatible as a whole with forms and materials that are authentic to the region. Design Drivers • Timeless architectural features and forms • A color palette drawn from earth tones and natural elements • A safe, balanced network of pedestrian, bicycle and automobile access • Inclusive opportunities to relax and gather • Lush, resilient plantings with multi-season interest • Responsible resource use Introduction To Design Guidelines This document is intended to help direct design solutions and define character for this project. It is also intended to provide concepts for future development that will establish and maintain the aesthetic character of Avienda. 389 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 7 Part One: Overall Overview There are a number of standards that apply to the entire Avienda development including recommendations for stormwater management, parks, streets, land use, parking, transit and other development components. Many of these overall Avienda guidelines overlap, or are integrated with one another. For ease of discussion they are categorized according to the same list of “layers” that formed the basic structure for the Guidelines: • Context – local, city, regional • Street Hierarchy – access, circulation, arrangement • Streetscape – preferred design, location • Parking – quantity, location, type • Architecture – preferred uses, horizontal/vertical mixed use, built form, character of development • Signage – design, location, quantity, type • Stormwater Management – surface water features, stormwater management • Open Spaces – trails and plazas It is essential that proposed design solutions for development projects and other improvements within Avienda demonstrate an understanding of the interplay between these layers.30' BUILDING SETBACK30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK 30' BUILDING SETBACK20' PARKING SETBACK10' PARKING SETBACK20' PARKING SETBACK 10' PARKING SETBACK US Hwy 212Lyman Boulevard Powers BoulevardBluff Creek BoulevardBe t h e s d a C i r c l e Lyman Boulvevard River Rock Drive NJersey Way RIVER ROCK D R S Degler Circle Sunset T ra i l Mills Drive Jeurissen LaneOUTLOT E OUTLOT A OUTLOT C 73,500 s.f. RETAIL RETAIL RETAIL 10,000 S.F. 35,000 S.F. RETAIL RETAIL ANCHOR RETAIL 8,000 S.F. RETAIL 3,000 S.F. 6,000 S.F. 8,000 S.F. 5,000 S.F. 15,000 S.F. 6,000 S.F. 7,000 S.F. RETAIL RETAIL REST REST 13,000 S.F. SENIOR 30,000 S.F. RETAIL CHILD CARE 10,000 S.F. REST 10,000 S.F. 8,000 S.F. RETAIL 8,000 S.F. RETAIL 7,000 S.F. REST 125,840 S.F. x 4 STORIES APARTMENTS Powers BoulevardBluff Creek Boulevard Avienda Parkway Mills Drive Landform and Site to Finish are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC.R R in collaboration with: LEVEL 7 DEVELOPMENT NORDLAND PARTNERS · RSP ARCHITECTS ESG ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN AVIENDA · Chanhassen, MN Regional Map Legend Stall Future Traffic Signal Existing Traffic Signal Stall Count Public Right Of Way Regional Commercial Future Development Area High Density Residential Medium Density Residential Preservation Ponding NORTH 0 150 300 Wetland and Buffer 12 494 10 394 169 5 169 55 62 100 62 MISS ISS IPP IRIVER BLOOMINGTON MINNEAPOLIS 35W SITE 94 94 694 35W 35W 35 35E 494 494 94 94 35W 212 169 169 100 12 MINNESOTARIVER CHANHASSEN MAPLE GROVE DP8.1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 8.1 SEPTEMBER 8, 2022 Development Data Section Gross Area (Acres) Net Developable Area (Acres) Building Area (S.F.)Parking Stalls Units/ Beds Parking Ratio (Stalls per 1,000 S.F. or per Unit) 1.91 1.91 6,000 36 6.0 1.66 1.66 10,000 47 4.7 3.76 3.76 35,000 168 4.8 2.26 2.26 10,000 23 2.3 1.27 1.27 13,000 70 5.4 1.75 1.75 15,000 82 5.5 1.46 1.46 5,000 85 17.0 1.48 1.48 6,000 76 12.7 1.62 1.62 7,000 67 9.6 1.06 1.06 7,000 30 4.3 6.10 6.10 45,000 239 5.3 6.60 6.60 93,227 n/a 53 2.74 2.74 24,632 n/a 8 9.27 7.35 95,449 n/a 31 12.51 12.51 461,089 869 417 4.48 4.45 30,000 115 3.8 7.07 7.07 73,524 213 300 1.2 15.31 15.31 n/a n/a 14.25 0.00 n/a n/a 20.87 0.00 n/a n/a 1.66 0.00 n/a n/a Total 119.09 80.36 936,921 n/a Notes Development plan shown for schematic purposes only and subject to change. 390 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 8 Context Overview Avienda is a unique area within Chanhassen; but it is a part of, and connected with, a variety of local, city-wide and regional systems (See Figure 1). Each development project, whether a single building, one lot, or a series of blocks, must provide reasonable links to these systems as a primary design objective. Recommendations To ensure that Avienda takes full advantage of local and regional systems, development should: • Provide safe, easily-recognized connections to city, county and state trail corridors • Make provisions for public amenities and encourage their use • Tie into, and improve, the Chanhassen utility network • Integrate with and complement the existing (and future) street framework • Become an integral part of the city and county drainage/stormwater management plan Objectives • Stormwater shall be managed to the maximum extent practicable to meet the requirements of the watershed, city and other agencies. Where stormwater features are visible, they should support the aesthetic design of the development • Bikeways and pedestrian routes in Avienda must be designed for safety and ease of access. 391 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 9 Street Hierarchy Overview The Development Master Plan defines a strategy for the layout of public and private streets in Avienda. The size, type and configuration of this street hierarchy is based on a combination of projected traffic volume, level of service at intersections, proposed adjacent land use and desired aesthetic character. These guidelines promote a system that balances pedestrian and vehicular use. Recommendations The proposed street pattern reflects an opportunity for residents and visitors to park once and enjoy the shops and amenities on foot. Methods to achieve this include: • Provide a street network that distributes pedestrian and vehicular traffic throughout Avienda (many choices or travel paths) • Promote improvements that invite pedestrian and bicycle use including wide sidewalks, streetscape amenities and designated bicycle trails 392 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 10 Conceptual Roadway LightingConceptual Pedestrian Lighting Objectives Creative design solutions for streetscape improvements should include: • Streetscape improvements that provide traffic calming • Inviting streetscapes that balance the needs of automobiles and pedestrians, and draw you into and through Avienda • A marriage of building design and streetscape design that encourages active spaces near the streets Street Lights Decorative street lights are desired for Avienda and the developer will work with the City and Xcel Energy to finalize the luminaire and pole types. Lighting design: Conceptual Roadway Lighting - Traditional Style Lamp in Bronze, offered through Xcel Energy, has been chosen for its aesthetic coordination with existing street fixtures in the neighborhood. Conceptual Pedestrian Lighting - BEGA brand 84 483 K3 (pole top luminaires) has been chosen for its quality and aesthetic. Select a style of similar character and quality. Streetscape Overview Amenities within the public right-of-way – and private portions of the pedestrian realm – play an important role in the aesthetics and placemaking of the Avienda streetscape: • Plazas and public gathering spaces • Street/sidewalk character and streetscape elements • Pedestrian/bicycle connections • Residential courts and other private green space The goal is to foster a safe and welcoming public realm that will invite pedestrian activity, promote traffic calming and encourage community gathering. Street trees, lighting and decorative fencing frame corridors and outdoor rooms. Special pavements, street furniture, public art and layered plantings will enhance points of interest and transition. Recommendations Give pedestrian scale to otherwise vast open parking lots, streets and plazas by: • Incorporating boulevard, median, and parking island trees to frame space and provide shade • Installing street lighting that meets all safety standards and design criteria, while creating a signature character for this district • Providing bike parking and pedestrian connections as part of each project within Avienda • Placing benches, seating, wayfinding kiosks and litter receptacles with regularity along trail loops 393 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 11 SidewalkBoulevard Median Street Street Boulevard TrailBirds eye of Bluff Creek Boulevard Section STREETSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS CHARACTER Natural Urban MAINTENANCE Low High PLANTING DENSITY High (screening) Low (visibility) PRIMARY USERS Automobile Long Term Impact SITE PRIORITY Immediate Impact Pedestrian Landscape enhancements at intersections Consistently planted median with thematic tie-ins to Avienda brand Swamp White Oak River Birch Street Trees Red Oak Northwood MapleDiscovery Elm White Oak 394 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 12 Lush plantings with year round interest and low water use. Avienda District Map Comfortable pedestrian connections within parking lots. Screen loading areas with high-quality materials that are consistent with the principal building. Parking Overview Balancing the realities of auto-related necessities and the desired character of Avienda is a significant challenge. The goal is to provide adequate parking – both quantity and location – while promoting new strategies that support the overall needs of Avienda. Parking will be provided through a combination of on-street spaces, off-street surface lots and structured ramps to support the mix of uses at Avienda. Parking structures should be below ground in high-density residential buildings or be lined with store/units or other street-level uses that are integrated into ramp design. Recommendations Parking guidelines encourage the following: • Provide a combination of fencing and landscaping to minimize the prominence of parking areas from important views • Explore options to integrate stormwater management requirements into parking area design • Landscaped parking islands intended for tree plantings must include adequate soil volume for healthy tree growth. Generally, provide one to three cubic feet of soil volume per one square foot of tree canopy area Objectives The primary objective is to provide a balance of surface lots, on-street and structured parking, with ample quantities and close proximity to serve the mix of uses in Avienda. In addition to providing adequate space, quality design is crucial. The framework for Avienda encourages creativity, innovation, quality and attention to detail in the project development, including parking solutions. Minimum Standards Parking in Avienda is intended to be shared to the greatest extent practicable in all mixed-use areas. Parking shall be provided under any of the following arrangements: • Shared parking arrangements between nearby uses are encouraged in all districts, including across Districts 1 and 2 • Within District 2 parking on individual parcels serving individual uses may be provided if designated and approved as part of the master plan • The development team will work with the City to identify opportunities for reduced and shared parking throughout the project Loading Areas Loading areas and docks shall be placed on the building’s least visible elevation. Loading areas shall be screened from public streets and residential areas through landscaping and building design measures. Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN 09.08.2020 Avienda District Map 395 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 13 Architecture Overview The architectural guidelines are intended to encourage an integration of both traditional and contemporary design. Buildings should have a balanced horizontal/vertical rhythm of windows, offsets, roof lines, materials and entrances. Buildings should be highlighted by massing variety that includes transition lines. Main entrances of buildings should be clearly identifiable and timeless architectural materials, features and forms should be integrated into the design. Architectural designs should provide high-quality design, measured, to a great degree, by the pedestrian experience along the street and sidewalk and by an architectural expression that provides character without being obtrusive or artificial. The quality of the materials selected shall be guided by the design drivers and classified in the Material Classification table. Recommendations Of all the layers that combine to form the project master plan, architecture will typically be the most prominent development component. Both visually and physically, architecture will play a major role in defining the overall design character and mix of uses. It is crucial that the design and location of buildings address these architectural guidelines with specific emphasis on the following: • Promote an animated street presence with a mix of street-level uses, interesting building facades, doors and windows on the street where appropriate, careful design of lighting, awnings, signage and other elements that animate the pedestrian experience • Promote variety in building design, character and expression; not one theme or building style, but a thoughtful integration of many design solutions • Promote a variety of building types, including a range of height, scale and proportion that supports an integrated mix of shopping destinations, food venues, service businesses, commercial office options and other mixed uses • Building location is as important as building style; special architectural elements, character, transparency and a higher level of materials and detailing should be used to highlight corridors and crossroads throughout the project • Encourage the use of high-quality materials (as listed under the material classifications), suggesting a preference toward native materials, with respect for local building techniques • Minimize the impact of all mechanical equipment, as viewed from ground levels at a variety of locations. All mechanical equipment located on the roof or around the perimeter of a structure shall be screened natural stonestucco/eifs greenscreen -steel structure and “greenscreen” mesh infill creates living scrim walls of vines storefront system -clear anodized aluminum storefront system with green tinted glass and spandrel glass -copper roof and facade panels copper metal panels steel structure and angled louvers create filtered shade shade trellis Material Classification* Class I: • Brick • Natural stone • Glass • Copper metal panels • Specialty concrete • Architecturally precast textured concrete panels Class II: • Opaque panels • Ornamental metal • Architectural rockface cmu • Masonry stucco • Exterior insulating finishing system (EIFS) • Wood *Other comparable or superior materials may be approved by Design Review Committee (DRC) by a raised parapet, by comparable and compatible exterior building materials, or painted to complement the building materials in order to diminish its impact. Incidental rooftop equipment deemed unnecessary to be screened by the City shall be of color to match the roof or the sky, whichever is more effective. • Equipment used for mechanical, processing, bulk storage tanks, or equipment used for suppressing noise, odors and the like that protrudes from a side of a building or is located on the ground adjacent to a building shall be screened from public view as much as practical with materials matching the design of the building. Where miscellaneous exterior equipment cannot be fully screened with matching building materials, landscaping may be used as additional screening. 396 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 14 Sign Master Plan Signage Overview Signage within Avienda should provide a system for clear wayfinding for all modes of transportation and should ensure successful business operation while maintaining Avienda’s brand. The Master Sign Plan identifies key sign locations. Developments shall apply to the City of Chanhassen for sign permitting. Objectives Signage should be used as a tool to help identify businesses and neighborhoods within Avienda and should have elements that are focused on its pedestrian nature as well as the signage needs for businesses. Signage and lighting which is integrated into the design of the building is encouraged. Definitions Project Identification Sign means a permanent ground, low profile sign which identifies a specific residential, industrial, commercial or office development and which is located on the premises of the development which it identifies. Off-Premise Directory Sign means a sign which identifies the names of specific businesses located in a shopping center, medical center or commercial, industrial or office development project which is located on the premises or entrance of the center or development so identified. Monument Sign means a low profile sign to identify key tenants on the parcel upon which the sign is located. Wayfinding Sign means a sign containing descriptions of major points of interest and businesses. 397 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 15 Project Identification Sign with Off-Premise Directory Sign in background Off-Premise Directory Sign Wayfinding Signage Off-Premise Directory Sign The Off-Premise Directory Sign is allowed as part of a holistic design coordinated with the Project Identification Signs at the Powers and Lyman entrances locations. The sign shall coordinate with the materials of other signage on site. Tenant sign panel may be 8 sf, 6’-0” wide x 1’-4” tall, up to (3) three signs per monument. Wayfinding Signs The pedestrian-oriented nature of Avienda requires unique signage that will build on the design concepts for the development. These types of signs include street signs and wayfinding signs. Such signage shall be allowed on public spaces as needed to provide information and wayfinding. Standards Project Identification Sign Project Identification Signs are located at the following locations as shown on the Sign Master Plan: • Two at the Powers Boulevard entrance • One at the Lyman Boulevard entrance • One at the retaining wall facing Highway 212 • One at the corner of Lyman Boulevard and Powers Boulevard • One at the intersection of Bluff Creek Boulevard and Avienda Parkway These signs located around the periphery of the Avienda development are allowed as shown on the signage plan and shall have consistent materials and colors. 398 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 16 Below and Right: Natural stone materials are preferred for sign bases of all scales Above: Monument Sign with multiple tenants Avienda District Map Project Identification Sign, view from highway 212 Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN 09.08.2020 Avienda District Map Monument Sign One sign is allowed per building in Districts 1-5 provided that the following standards are met: • The signboard shall be constructed of wood, acrylic, aluminum or metal and shall be architecturally compatible with the style, composition, materials, colors and details of the building • No part of the sign shall encroach on the right-of-way and its location shall not interfere with pedestrian or vehicular circulation • Projects with multiple tenants in a single building shall coordinate project signage as part of a holistic design. Monument signs within District 2 should incorporate the Village brand identity of Avienda. Prohibited signs The following signs are prohibited: • Signs employing mercury vapor, low pressure and high pressure sodium and metal halide lighting; plastic panel rear-lighted signs. • Signs on roofs, dormers and balconies • Billboards • Back-lit awnings • Interchangeable letter boards or panels • Flashing signs 399 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 17 Building Signs The following parameters apply to building signs. Local authority review, approval and permitting are also required. All storefront signage and graphics are to be first reviewed and approved. All sign packages are to include: • Locations • Sizes • Style of lettering • Materials • Types of illumination • Installation details • Logo design No roof-mounted signs are permitted. Store identification signs shall be limited to the Purchaser/Lessee’s trade name. The Purchaser/Lessee must use a crest, shield, logo or other establishment corporate insignia, the area of which shall be included within the allowable sign area. Any sign, notice or other self-illuminated signs, located in the interior of the premises and easily legible from the exterior, except those which are required by law, code, ordinances or regulations, will be allowed only if permitted by the City of Chanhassen. All attachment devices, wiring, clips, transformers, lamps, tubes, bulbs, light sources, manufacturers labels and plates and other mechanisms for signage shall be concealed from public view. Letters may be interior-illuminated with lamps wholly within the depth of the letter. Only the following types of storefront signage will be permitted: • Individual dimensional work or metal back-lit (“halo effect”) letters. • Internally-illuminated channel letters with opaque metal sides and translucent plastic faces. • No exposed crossover, raceways, ballast boxes or transformers will be permitted for wall-mounted signs. Raceways needed to support otherwise floating letters (not mounted to a wall) shall be painted to match adjacent buildings. All penetrations of the building structure required for sign installation shall be seating in a water tight condition and shall be patched to match adjacent finish. The following types of signs and sign components and devises will not be permitted unless otherwise approved: • Moving, rotating, or revolving signs • Exterior changeable letters or signs • Noisemaking signs • Signs painted directly on the storefront sign band • Signs employing flashing, flickering, changing or moving lights of any kind • Inflatable signs Examples of some features that align with this intent are shown at right. 400 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 18 Large Tenant Retail Signage Large Tenant Retail Signage • Calculations apply to tenants with more than 10,000 sf of leasable area • Signage shall be integrated into the architectural features of the façade to which they are attached • Maximum signage area is calculated at 15% of wall area for each building • Maximum area calculation may transfer to other storefronts, leased by the same tenant to increase tenant visibility to surrounding streets • Wall-mounted signs shall not project more than 10” from the building. Cabinet signs are prohibited. • Service/secondary signage maximum area is 2 sf Table 1 Max. Percent of Wall Area Wall Area in Square Feet (sq. ft.) 15%0-600 13%601-1,200 11%1,201-1,800 9&1,801-2,400 7%2,401-3,200 5%3,201-4,500 3%, not to exceed 275 sq. ft.4,500+ 401 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 19 Stormwater Management Overview Stormwater management will be handled with a mix of surface ponds, raingardens, permeable pavement, filtration and underground chambers. The mix of systems will provide an environmentally responsible, visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater while providing focal amenities. Detailed strategies for managing stormwater within Avienda can be found in the Stormwater Management Plan. Objectives • Stormwater shall be managed to the maximum extent practicable to meet the requirements of the watershed, city and other agencies. • Integration of water and landscape, use of high quality materials and providing a safe environment supply the overlying objectives. Recommendations Stormwater management facilities will be for the most part installed and maintained by the master developer. Individual development projects should implement additional management features, as feasible, depending on their specific situations. 402 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 20 Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN 09.08.2020 Avienda District Map Public Spaces Overview Avienda healthy living brand seeks to incorporate a full menu of activity choices for visitors and residents. The plan links the existing neighborhood and trails through Avienda, creating interesting gathering nodes along the way. Of equal importance is the contribution from each development project to this network of green, adding a variety of private, semi-private, and perhaps some additional public space throughout Avienda. Private development will share the responsibility to provide inviting, innovative and usable green space as integral parts of individual parcel site design. Recommendations The Design Guidelines encourages the following: • Private development should provide inviting gathering space as integral parts of each development project • Create signature features (ponds, fountains, plazas) as major visual amenities throughout Avienda • Small pedestrian nodes should highlight transition points within Avienda and provide respite along particularly long stretches of trail Objectives Based on the Development Master Plan for Avienda, a variety of public and private green space is proposed including: • Each project within Sub-Districts 1, 2, 3 and 4 will provide intentional plazas or green areas as integral components of site development and building design • A pedestrian node should include seating, a litter receptacle and shade with proportional understory plantings to anchor the area comfortably within the context of the trail or sidewalk. Pedestrian level lighting and wayfinding should be considered depending on the node location PEDESTRIAN NODE CHARACTERISTICS CHARACTER Natural Urban MAINTENANCE Low High PLANTING DENSITY High (screening) Low (visibility) PRIMARY USERS Pedestrian Automobile Long Term Impact SITE PRIORITY Immediate Impact Views of plantings and pedestrian nodes along primary pedestrian routes Avienda District Map 403 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Avienda Overall – 21 Pedestrian Circulation Model Swamp White Oak Pink Spires Crabapple Red Jewel Crabapple Red OakRiver Birch Northwood MapleDiscovery Elm Street Trees Pedestrian Interest Eastern White Pine Crimson Spire Oak 404 Sub-Districts – 22DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Part Two: District Guidelines Overview The Master Plan identifies five distinct districts within Avienda. Each of these districts (outlined on the plan below) is defined by specific site development patterns and perhaps a distinctive character or image. The districts complement one another as part of the overall plan. The districts are shown the attached District Map (Figure 5). They include: • District 1 - Retail – provides a location for larger-scale in-line and stand- alone retail and entertainment uses. • District 2 - Village Retail – provides the broadest variety, highest density and greatest intensity of development, encouraging both vertical and horizontal mixed use • District 3 - Mixed Use – provides a location for smaller-scale retail, service and other auto-oriented uses as well as hotels and medical/technology- related office. • District 4 - Multi-Family Housing – provides opportunities for high density senior or rental apartments • District 5 - Low Density Housing – provides opportunities for small lot homes Development plans must respond to the overall Avienda Design Guidelines described in Part One, but also the following detailed framework for each sub- district. To further clarify and illustrate proposed features in the Master Plan, these sub-district guidelines are organized under the following categories: • Public Realm / Streetscape • Site Design • Architectural In all cases, the sub-district framework must be applied in harmony with the overall Avienda framework and with other existing city, county, state codes, design criteria, plans and studies that support broader goals for regional growth and development. Public Realm/Streetscape The developer shall be responsible for construction of all streetscape improvements along adjacent streets. These improvements include all hardscape and landscape improvements, such as trails, sidewalks, street trees, benches, bike racks, litter receptacles and plantings. Plazas Except for District 5-Low Density Housing, all properties with principal buildings should have some public plaza space. The public plaza space should include benches, trash receptacles, lighting fixtures and other amenities to create a welcoming space for tenants, residents and guests. These plazas spaces should be visible from the main site access (front door) or well aligned with the project’s public frontage. Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. AVIENDA • Chanhassen, MN 09.08.2020 Avienda District Map MIXED USE DISTRICT VILLAGE RETAIL DISTRICT RETAIL DISTRICT MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING DISTRICT LOW DENSITY HOUSING DISTRICT 405 Sub-Districts – 23DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES BUILDING CHARACTER Providing a creative mix of building types, scales and expressions ARCHITECTURAL EXPRESSION contemporary “timeless” design that translates to all aspects of the development 406 Sub-District 1 – 24DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES District 1 - Retail Public Realm/Streetscape The Retail District encourages a mix of large and small floor plate buildings comprised of retail and entertainment uses. With opportunities for in-line retail development comes auto-related infrastructure such as easily accessed surface parking lots. Again, this suggests that equal attention be paid to public realm and streetscape improvements that not only accommodate vehicles, but also invite bicycle and pedestrian traffic through surface parking areas. Site Development Buildings in this district should orient towards surface parking, with primary entries provided to animate these façades. Architectural Character Massing and rhythm define the overall feel of an individual building. Massing and rhythm in this district should include breaks in the roof line and vertical transition lines that articulate separate tenants in the same building. Massing and rhythm should continue around corners and buildings should not appear to have a “rear” facade. Maximum heights for buildings in this sub-district are limited to three stories. 407 Sub-District 2 – 25DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES District 2 - Village Retail Public Realm / Streetscape Public realm and streetscape improvements define the character of Avienda and create a memorable signature for the Village District. Great plazas and great streets encourage intensified levels of activity, support the proposed mix of uses, invite community gathering and accommodate special events throughout the year. • Provide gracious sidewalk width to support intensity of pedestrian traffic in the Village District • Incorporate durable, high quality amenities including unit pavers, integral-colored concrete or scoring patterns, additional plantings, ornamental fencing and other features • Trees and planters along Village District streets to create an inviting space. • Wide sidewalks and logical connections to the Avienda trail system. Outdoor dining is encouraged • Plaza space is strongly encouraged at key development nodes. A variety of plaza uses have been explored to support the needs of residents and guests to gather, play, relax and eat Architectural Character Buildings should be composed of a visually distinct “base”, “middle” and “top”. Adopting a visually-distinct base will support the relationship of the building to the pedestrian experience. Adopting a visually distinct middle will create locations to provide signage as well as architectural massing and overall proportions that enhance the character of the development. Adopting a visually-distinct top will create consistency and will uniquely identify where the building meets the sky. Heights in this zone are restricted to a maximum of two stories above grade. Village Characteristics CHARACTER Natural Urban MAINTENANCE Low High PLANTING DENSITY High (screening) Low (visibility) PRIMARY USERS Pedestrian Automobile Long Term Impact SITE PRIORITY Immediate Impact 408 Sub-District 2 – 26DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Corner tenants are allowed to match primary entrance signage at two storefronts. Blade Sign(s) to be calculated as part of total allowable signage. Blade Signs to be a min. of 8’ AFF, may not extend above the cornice line, and may have a max. signage area not to exceed 4 sf per face. Wall-mounted signs shall not project more than 10” from the building. Cabinet signs are prohibited. “Storefront” refers to the first 12’ above each tenant floor of lease area building frontage with public access. “Elevation” refers to the first 12’ above each tenant floor of lease area building frontage without public access. Office tenant signage will be allowed on a building directory near the primary entrance and ability to use monument signage locations. Design Review Committee approval shall be based on sign design quality, attractiveness, scale appropriateness and compatibility with the building to which attached. Service/secondary signage maximum area is 2 sf. Outlots will be allowed (1) freestanding ground monument within their property that conforms to the overall development materials and aesthetic, with a maximum size of 5’-0” (H) x 10’-0” (W) with approval by the Design Review Committee. Signage Village Project Sign areas: Large tenant signage #1, 15 sf, 4’-0” wide x 3’-8” tall, (1) one sign per Project Sign Large tenant signage #2, 8 sf, 4’-0” wide x 2’-0” tall, (2) two signs per Project Sign Village Tenant Signage Criteria: Tenant signage calculations apply to tenants with less than 10,000 sf of leasable area. Maximum signage area is calculated at 15% of storefront area for each elevation of the storefront. Optional signage allowance on rear elevation. Signage to be no more than 50% of primary entrance. Length of the sign shall not be more than 75% of the overall tenant storefront measured linearly in width. Signage may be calculated for each storefront or elevation facing a designated pedestrian corridor. Maximum area calculation may transfer to other storefronts or building elevations leased by the same tenant to increase tenant visibility to surrounding streets. The body of the sign shall not exceed 30” in height. Enlarged initials, capitals and extended typographical elements (e.g., such as the up and down strokes of “g” and “h”, etc.), are acceptable up to a maximum of 36” in height or width. Stacked signage or logos must not exceed 48” in height and must fit other signage criteria. 409 Sub-District 2 – 27DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Streetscape Character 410 Sub-District 2 – 28DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Gathering space related to adjacent retail that encourages lingering, gathering and connection. This setting identified as LIVE/RELAX is a peaceful area with small seating groups and options for an overhead canopy, fire feature, kinetic art, calming water features and lush plantings. LIVE/RELAX is comfortable and shady on a hot day and a welcoming place to cozy up to the fire in the cool season. Gathering Space - Live / Relax 411 Sub-District 2 – 29DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Gathering Space - Work/Play Outdoor space connected to adjacent retail that encourages gathering and supports lively energy. Active areas with movable seating, these spaces appeal to a wide range of users and provide alternative work spaces for the office tenants of Avienda. 412 Sub-District 2 – 30DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES 413 Sub-District 2 – 31DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES PEDESTRIAN REALM place amenities with regularity along walkable streets. Create comfortable outdoor places, in a variety of scales, to meet, shop and relax. BUILDING PLACEMENT align buildings with the pedestrian environment. Encourage window shopping. MATERIAL EXPRESSION use a consistent high-quality palette of materials that is consistent with Avienda’s brand. 414 Sub-District 2 – 32DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES 415 Sub-District 2 – 33DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES 416 Sub-District 2 – 34DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES MATERIAL COLOR palette drawn from earthtones and natural elements ANIMATED STREET PRESENCE vibrant pedestrian experience along street, providing opportunities to relax and gather STORMWATER UTILIZATION using stormwater as an amenity with ponds and water features 417 Sub-District 2 – 35DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES LANDSCAPING create new, attractive design and landscape features BUILDING DESIGN VARIETY variation in character and expression MATERIALS high-quality natural materials 418 Sub-District 2 – 36DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES LIGHTING inclusion of lighting elements to help articuate and illuminate the site BUILDING INTEREST thoughtfully-placed signed and utilization of awning and overhang features WALKING PATHS meandering walking paths that connect the site and adjacent trails 419 Sub-District 3 – 37DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES District 3 - Mixed Use Public Realm / Streetscape The Mixed Use District accommodates office, hotel and auto-oriented retail uses in a mix of large and small floor plates. These auto-oriented uses suggest even greater attention be paid to public realm and streetscape improvements that not only accommodate vehicles, but also invite pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Surface parking lots provide convenient access to office buildings and storefronts but present an additional challenge to the overall visual character and aesthetic appeal of this area. Plazas adjacent to main entrances are encouraged. Architectural Character Multi-story buildings in the Mixed Use District should have a ground-floor level that is visually distinct and proportionally larger than individual floors above it. Buildings in this district should not appear to have a rear façade, and building heights are restricted to four stories above grade. 420 Sub-District 4 – 38DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES District 4 - Multi-Family Housing Public Realm/Streetscape A large preserve area and access to regional trails supply the informal green space for Avienda, and more specifically, provide the valuable park frontage and mix of amenities needed to support housing development within the Multi- Family District. Site Development The Multi-Family District emphasizes residential development. To support the proposed housing, a well connected project will link residents to the Village Retail District (activity center of Avienda) and adjacent recreational amenities. Residential front doors will connect with public walks along each of these streets promoting the urban character of Avienda. Special attention should be paid to welcome adjacent existing neighborhoods into Avienda. Architectural Guidelines Buildings in the Multi-Family District should have uniformly proportional floors. Architectural expressions on the facade should relate to the units behind and should create a distinct seperation of the individual units in a generally uniform design style. Heights are restricted to six stories above grade. 421 Sub-District 5 – 39DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES District 5 - Low Density Housing Public Realm/Streetscape A large preserve area and access to regional trails supply the informal green space for Avienda, and more specifically, provide the valuable park frontage and mix of amenities needed to support housing development within the Multi- Family and Low Density Districts. Site Development The Low Density District emphasizes residential development. To support the proposed housing, a well connected project will link residents to the Village Retail District (activity center of Avienda) and adjacent recreational amenities. Residential front doors will connect with public walks along each of these streets promoting the urban character of Avienda. Special attention should be paid to welcome adjacent existing neighborhoods into Avienda. • Within this district a minimum driveway length of 20-feet is recommended to limit conflicts between vehicles parked in the driveway and street or sidewalk users 422 423 424 425 Memorandum To:Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director From:Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer CC: Charles Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer George Bender, Assistant City Engineer Date:8/4/2022 Re:Avienda PUD Amendment – Planning Case #2022-12 The Public Works and Engineering Department has reviewed the PUD Amendment submittal for the Avienda development. These comments are divided into two categories: general comments and proposed conditions. General comments are informational points to guide the applicant in the proper planning of public works infrastructure for this project, to inform the applicant of possible extraordinary issues and/or to provide the basis for findings. Proposed conditions are requirements that Public Works and Engineering recommend be formally imposed on the development in the final order. Note that references to the “City Standards” herein refer to the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates. General Comments/Findings 1. Any and all utility and transportation plans submitted with this application have been reviewed only for the purpose of determining the feasibility of providing utility and transportation facilities for the project in accordance with City Standards. A recommendation of approval does not constitute final approval of details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and points of access, connection or discharge, that are depicted or suggested in the application. The applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings and/or plat drawings for the project, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen Engineering and Public Works Department will review plans, in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or require modifications to the plans or drawings based upon conformance with City Standards, the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances and the professional engineering judgment of the City Engineer. 426 2. It is the opinion of the Engineering Department that the proposed amendment can be developed in accordance with the requirements of the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances (as it pertains to Engineering and Public Works requirements) and City Standards, provided it fully addresses the comments and conditions contained herein. 3. The applicant is proposing to amend the Avienda PUD ordinance by changing and combining senior housing to one building located in the southern portion of the site, increasing the multi-family building (apartments) by 167 units, changing and relocating the entertainment use area, increasing the number of medium density units (townhouses/villas) by 53, and adding more drive throughs. The applicant has submitted a plan sheet titled “Development Plan 8.1” dated July 15, 2022, which is an illustrative depiction of the site’s layout based on the proposed amended PUD land uses. Staff has concerns regarding how the proposed land uses will alter the ultimate build-out, as depicted by Development Plan 8.1, and its impact on the surrounding public street operations along with the traffic circulation within the site. These concerns also include the interface between publicly owned and privately owned facilitates and their maintenance activities (e.g. snow removal). In order to assess any potential traffic deficiencies that may arise such as impacts to traffic safety, intersection operations, street capacity, etc., an update to the existing traffic study associated with the 2016 AUAR Update should be provided based on the newly proposed uses. Additionally, upon submittal of each subsequent plat and/or site plan within the Avienda development, a Traffic Impact Study should be performed for the immediate road network (Bluff Creek Blvd, Avienda Parkway, and Sunset Trail) which will also include the internal circulation of the site based on the proposed plans. This traffic impact study will be updated and build upon each approval for the development to ensure that the abutting public streets and internal site circulation meet acceptable levels of service and maintain safe and sustainable traffic operations. See proposed conditions 1 and 2. 4. The Development Plan 8.1 provided depicts an access off of Bluff Creek Blvd just east of the most eastern round-a-bout. Due to the anticipated volumes and it’s proximity to the round-a-bout there are serious concerns regarding traffic operations and potential safety issues. While Development Plan 8.1 is illustrative in nature, this access point as depicted should not be taken as an approved access under this PUD amendment consideration. All access points and driveway locations will be reviewed and ultimately approved with the future Outlot development plans. See proposed condition 3. 5. Public utilities to the development were originally designed to meet the needs of the development based on the original PUD land uses approved in 2020. The newly proposed land uses will impact the utility needs of the development, as such the applicant shall provide an updated capacity analysis to determine whether the public utilities installed have sufficient capacities to meet the needs of the usages proposed. See proposed condition 4. 427 Proposed Conditions 1. The applicant shall update the traffic analysis completed for the 2016 AUAR Update based on the approved land uses for the development. 2. Each subsequent plat and/or site plan will be required to complete a Traffic Impact Study for the abutting local road network to identify capacity deficiencies at affected intersections and to help identify feasible solutions to identified deficiencies. This shall also include; an assessment of internal circulation for vehicles and pedestrians; the interface between public and private streets and trails and their respective maintenance operations; and emergency service access and circulation. 3. The access point east of the most eastern round-a-bout on Bluff Creek Boulevard, as depicted in Development Plan 8.1 dated July 15, 2022, is not approved. 4. An updated capacity analysis shall be provided based on the approved land uses to determine if the municipal utilities to service the development are adequate. 428 MEMORANDUM July 26, 2022 To: Steven Sabraski, Landform and Mark Nordland, Level 7 Development, LLC From: Toole Design Project: Avienda Final Roadway Plans Re: Updated Avienda Development-Driven Trip Generation The purpose of this memo is to compare the results of the initial trip generation analysis to the results of the updated trip generation analysis. This memo also lists the assumptions made when calculating the updated trip generation totals. Updated Trip Generation Introduction Trip generation estimates were prepared for the Avienda development based on the latest site plan 8.1 and have been compared to estimates from the 2017 Chanhassen Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). The 2017 AUAR used the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition to calculate trip generation rates for two different development concepts: Concept A assumed wetland mitigation, while Concept B assumed wetland preservation. In this updated analysis, the 10th Edition of the Trip Generation Manual was used to calculate trip generation estimates for the actual land uses being developed, which include a day care center, retail, restaurant, office, residential (apartments, senior living, and townhomes), and hotel components. 2017 Trip Generation Table 1 shows the 2017 trip generation estimates for Concept A. Only the estimates for the northeast quadrant (Avienda development) are shown. Concept A traffic volumes were used in the Intersection Control Evaluation Report (ICE Report) for T.H. 212 North Ramp at Powers Boulevard prepared by Toole Design Group, dated May 18, 2022. The Specific land use codes (LUC) from the Trip Generation Manual used in preparing the trip generation estimates from 2017 were provided in Appendix B of the AUAR report and are included in Table 1. 429 2 Table 1: 2017 Trip Generation Estimates (Concept A) Land Use LUC Intensity Trip Generation Values Daily AM Total (In/Out) PM Total (In/Out) Day Care Center 565 16,000 SF 1,185 195 (105/90) 195 (90/105) Retail 820 393,000 SF 16,780 375 (235/140) 1,460 (700/760) Restaurant 932 26,500 SF 3,370 285 (155/130) 260 (155/105) Office 710 150,000 SF 1,655 235 (205/30) 225 (40/185) Residential- Attached (Apartments) 220 407 DU 2,590 205 (40/165) 240 (155/85) Residential- Attached (Townhomes) 230 38 DU 125 10 (0/10) 10 (5/5) Hotel 310 100 Rooms 520 55 (30/25) 60 (30/30) Total Site Generated Trips 26,225 1,360 (770/590) 2,450 (1,175/1,275) Internal Capture Reduction 6,448 295 (150/145) 660 (330/330) Total Driveway Trips 19,777 1,065 (620/445) 1,790 (845/945) Pass-By Reduction 5,512 -- 460 (230/230) Total Net New Trips 14,265 1,065 (620/445) 1,330 (615/715) 2022 Trip Generation Table 2 shows the updated trip generation results for the proposed Avienda development based on Development Plan 8.1 dated July 15, 2022. Land use codes (LUC) from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition are included in the second column. The methodology in NCHRP Report 684 was followed to obtain the internal capture reduction rates, and the pass-by tables from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition were used to obtain the pass-by reduction rates. Specific assumptions for each part of the trip generation process are listed below. Trip Generation When using the Trip Generation Manual to obtain the number of daily, AM peak, and PM peak trips, the LUC from the 2017 AUAR were replicated to make a fair comparison of vehicle trips. There are some variations within the residential uses. LUC 230 (townhomes) does not appear in the newest edition of the Trip Generation Manual, so LUC 220, Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) was used instead. LUC 221, Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) was used 430 3 for the four-story apartment building, and LUC 252, Senior Adult Housing-Attached was used to generate trips for the senior living facility. Table 2: 2022 Trip Generation Estimates Land Use LUC Intensity Trip Generation Values Daily AM Total (In/Out) PM Total (In/Out) Day Care Center 565 10,000 SF 476 110 (58/52) 111 (52/59) Retail 820 167,000 SF 8,521 235 (146/89) 794 (381/413) Restaurant 932 28,000 SF 3,141 278 (153/125) 274 (170/104) Office 710 150,000 SF 1,572 167 (144/23) 167 (27/141) Residential-Attached (Apartments) 221 417 DU 2,271 139 (36/103) 174 (106/68) Residential-Attached (Senior Living) 252 300 DU 1,181 60 (21/39) 74 (41/33) Residential-Attached (Townhomes) 220 92 DU 655 44 (10/34) 55 (35/20) Hotel 310 100 Rooms 702 45 (26/18) 49 (25/24) Total Site Generated Trips 18,518 1,078 (595/484) 1,699 (837/862) Internal Capture Reduction 1,798 270 (137/135) 714 (360/362) Total Driveway Trips 16,721 809 (458/348) 985 (477/500) Pass-By Reduction 4,031 -- 397 (206/190) Total Net New Trips 12,690 809 (458/348) 588 (270/310) Internal Capture Reduction When calculating the internal capture reduction rate, it was assumed that all trips would be made by motor vehicle. As a result, the mode split accounted for 0% transit trips and 0% non-motorized trips, as well as a vehicle occupancy of 1.0. Land use interchange distances were omitted from the calculation. Pass-By Reduction The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition only provided pass-by reduction tables for PM peak traffic. Table 2 shows the PM pass-by reduction rates applied to the total daily trips as well. Summary Comparing the total net new trips in Table 2 with those in Table 1, overall vehicle trips are expected to be less with the new composition of land use of the Avienda development. The ICE analysis performed for the intersection of T.H. 212 Ramp at Powers Boulevard assumed higher vehicle volumes and can be considered 431 4 conservative in its recommendation; proposed signal modification and intersection geometry will be suited to accommodate actual development-driven traffic. 432 Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Office (952) 466-5200 | Fax (952) 466-5223 | www.co.carver.mn.us CARVER COUNTY Review comments from the July 2022 Planned Unit Development Amendment submittal are made in blue italic font. Comments updated August 5, 2022. City of Chanhassen c/o Kate Aanenson Community Development Director 952-227-1139 kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us May 9, 2018 City of Chanhassen c/o Paul Oehme Director of Public Works/City Engineer 952-227-1169 poehme@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Re: Development/Access Review Comments: Avienda – Progress Set Plans dated 4.25.2018 (Preliminary Plans) – CSAH 18/Lyman Blvd and CSAH 17/Powers Blvd/ US 212 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development plans in the City of Chanhassen. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval and as potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project: 1. As an overall comment, prior to the next stage of plans and plat / site plans approval, the County would like to review and approve plans of detailed intersection and related segment geometric design plans with phasing and planned implementation steps and schedules. If the opportunity is not allowed for a reasonable review of such, this could lead to delays in the permitting process and potential major revisions to plans and right of way. The County is available to meet on project management or design meetings. a. Information 2. Plans for Bluff Creek Blvd at and from CSAH 17 / Powers Blvd look adequate as long as 2- lanes are maintained on the ingress side to the local roundabout, and 3-lanes are maintained on the egress side to Powers Blvd and the traffic signal intersection there. The exact width for the ingress should be a minimum of 28-ft face-to-face and preferably closer to 30-ft to accept dual LTs in. A cross-section detail should be provided for Bluff Creek Blvd as well as a plan and profile showing the vertical profile from the center-line of Powers Blvd to the internal roundabout. 433 a. Coordination of specifications of plan set to be approved as part of permit approval. 3. As a note, the geometric design of the internal (City) roundabout (ICD=125 ft) could be (or should be) improved—contact the County if the City would like additional feedback. a. Coordination of specifications of plan set to be approved as part of permit approval. 4. The Bluff Creek Blvd connection to the existing traffic signal at Powers Blvd/ CSAH 17 and US 212 will require traffic signal modifications and upgrades. Some form of contract / permit and surety with the County will be required for design, construction, re-timing / re- programming, and final inspection for the traffic signal and roadway approach and loop detection facilities. Striping and restriping of lanes and/or crosswalks may be needed to be incorporated into the project. The modification of the existing pedestrian push buttons / APS system may also be needed. Please contact the County and MnDOT to set up a scoping and design meeting. In addition, an intersection detail and traffic signal layout and wiring plan will be required to update the current record traffic signal plan. a. See item #14 5. The intersection of Sunset Trail / Lyman Blvd will need to be reviewed in detail for intersection control alternatives. Intersection traffic operations at this location are a concern and it may be that access needs to be restricted to right-in / right-out until such time that higher order intersection facilities are available and/or provided for. a. See item #14 6. The proposed cross-section of Sunset Trail from Lyman Blvd (CSAH 18) to the south will need to be widened five (5) feet to account for this access condition as well as for two turn lanes out and enough space for truck turning movements in. The cross-section should be 22- ft in; and 27-ft out (10-17-ft). A cross-section detail should be provided for Bluff Creek Blvd as well as a plan and profile showing the vertical profile and alignment plan from the development’s internal street intersection to the far side of Lyman Blvd intersection, to include the existing street on the north side of the intersection. Further changes to Sunset Trail and its alignment may be required. a. Condition applies, see item #14. Coordination of specifications of plan set to be approved as part of permit approval. 7. A full right of way intersection detail of the Sunset Trail and Lyman Blvd will need to be provided to show plans for a future traffic signal layout, wiring, loop detection, and corridor interconnection plan. In addition, numerous utilities are in place in the NW quadrant and some are being looked at to be relocated, such that a utility plan may also be required. Pedestrian ramps and other improvements will be required including pedestrian push buttons / APS systems. In addition, intersection lighting will need to be reviewed and included if not adequate as determined by the County. Contract / permit and surety with the County will be required for design, construction, and final inspection for the intersection connection, and if approved traffic signal and roadway approach facilities. Striping and restriping of lanes and/or crosswalks may be needed to be incorporated into the project. 434 a. Condition applies, see item #14. Coordination of specifications of plan set to be approved as part of permit approval. 8. The proposed vertical profile of Sunset Trail from Lyman Blvd (CSAH 18) to the south looks overly steep and will need to be revised to provide 100-feet of 2% max profile and match to the existing Lyman Blvd grade. A check for future loops and/or video camera signal detection may also be required. a. Coordination of specifications of plan set to be approved as part of permit approval. 9. The contour and grading of the site will need to factor in additional roadway width to include a right turn lane from Lyman Blvd to Powers Blvd. with the existing right turn lane converting to a through lane in future plans. The plat and the separate site plans’ final grading plans and right of way along both CSAH 18 and CSAH 17 will need to be reviewed and approved to show how this is set up for the planned future CSAH 18 future plans. Prior to next stage grading and plat approval, the County would like to review and approve an exhibit drawing showing a cross section of Lyman Blvd on both ends of the plat edges. The cross sections would show the future road improvements and how these improvements might affect the subject lots and any other plat or lot proposed improvements. The two cross sections should be referenced to a plan view at 1:40 scale from center of existing ROW and existing grade, with notes on proposed grades for the roadway and subject lots. a. Information, see comment #15. 10. The field entrance on the south side of Lyman Blvd approximately 400 ft. east of Sunset Trail must be removed and replaced with full B curb. a. Condition applies 11. As part of our review of the preliminary plans, the following are also noted: the City stubbed in a new water main at the SW quadrant of Powers Blvd and Lyman Blvd (NE quadrant of the property). County has fiber conduit and vaults along the south side of Lyman Blvd the entire length of this property. Utility plan shows the casing outside of the roadway on Sunset Trail. Proposed grading plans and utility plans will need further review to show and resolve these conflicts. a. Condition applies 12. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way, the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works: (http://www.co.carver.mn.us/how-do-i/apply-for/a-permit). Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits. a. Condition applies 13. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at development expense, including 435 costs incurred by the County. a. Information Update: 14. With the increase in number of housing units on the subject site, the following are needed: a. A new ICE report for the intersection at Lyman Blvd & Sunset Trail. i. With the information available to the County to date, a signal would be required. If the ICE report determines that a signal is required, this would be at the developer’s expense. b. An update to the ICE report for the intersection at Powers Blvd & Bluff Creek Blvd. 15. Regarding final approvals and required permits - a. The County will need to review and approve the final grading plans for properties adjacent to CSAH 18 and CSAH 17. A grading permit will be required for grading work within the highway right of way. b. An access permit will be required for accesses onto CSAH 18 CSAH 17 due to this change in use and connection of the site improvements to both CSAH 18 and CSAH 17. c. The technical details of any final plat, its boundaries and form(s) will need to be reviewed and approved by the County Surveyor. 2018: These are comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at dmccormick@co.carver.mn.us or by phone at (952) 466-5208. Sincerely, Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE Transportation Manager Carver County Public Works 2022: These are the County’s comments, updated as of August 5th, 2022. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact staff noted below: Jack Johansen Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5283 jjohansen@co.carver.mn.us Angie Stenson AICP Sr. Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5273 astenson@co.carver.mn.us Darin Mielke PE Assistant Public Works Director Carver County Public Works 952.466.5222 dmielke@co.carver.mn.us 436 From: Erin <erinmichelle13@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 7:01 PM To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Avienda Public Comment Hello, I would like to provide some feedback on the proposed amendment to the Avienda plan. I have lived in Chanhassen for over 11 years now. I attended the earliest meetings about Avienda (previously called The Quadrant) and have been following the progress and changes. I attended the informational session on Thursday, and after looking over this proposed plan more, I wanted to provide my input. Originally, this was supposed to be a neighborhood gathering place for people to hang out and spend time, get groceries, go shopping, eat dinner...the entertainment, shops and restaurants were the anchor and center of the project with everything else surrounding that. From this new schematic, I see a humungous apartment complex now the center of the project with everything else worked around "it." I feel this 5 story complex made to be 6 stories with the parking garage is going to be an eye sore in our community. It reminds me of the apartment complexes in Eden Prairie by the transit station which fit well there right off the freeway, but I don't see them fitting well smack dab in the middle of beautiful landscape in Chanhassen. They mentioned there will only be 1.75 parking stalls per unit (and there will be up to 417 units now) and they mentioned there would be roughly 100 outdoor parking spots for the apartments. This doesn't seem like enough parking for the apartment owners and their guests and I can see them taking up a lot of street parking. Another thing to mention, is a huge apartment complex like this is typically seen near a transit station or public transit, and there isn't one here. The closest one is off 101 and 212. I do not want to see a transit station move out here to accommodate this apartment. As I was driving around running errands this weekend, I made a point to look for 5 story apartments around the area in Chaska and Eden Prairie, and they are HUGE. They don't look good. They completely change the appearance of a neighborhood and I didn't see any directly around houses (this apartment will be stacked in with row houses and butting up to another neighborhood). Also, what is going to happen if there isn't enough interest in these expensive luxury apartments...will they sit vacant? Will they be changed to low income housing? Has a study been done to determine if there is enough demand for apartments in this price range in our community? I realize if there is, it would bring a lot of tax revenue, but if there isn't, this could be a drain financially on the community. I highly recommend the council think this through and do the adequate research before approving this change of nearly doubling the number of apartments. The other concerning thing I heard the presenter say is he doesn't expect families with children will be moving into these new housing units and that there wouldn't be kids...the original plans were inclusive of families and children. When did this change? So this won't be a place to gather and hang out with families anymore? What is the point of the ice skating rink and gathering area? Everything surrounding this area is single family homes, why are we trying to completely change this demographic? Thanks for considering my input/comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Kind Regards, Erin Wong, Chanhassen resident 437 -----Original Message----- From: Robin's E-Mail <rmspevacek@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2022 6:03 AM To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Avienda Village open spaces I am interested in knowing what the plan is for tree and shrub cover and open spaces for wildlife and pollinators. I am also interested in knowing how much consideration was given to energy efficiency with regard to the use of water, natural gas and electricity in the complex. The city has a unique opportunity here to set an example for not only the community but for the region! Rochelle Spevacek Sent from my iPhone -----Original Message----- From: Eric Swanson <swanels@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 12:36 PM To: Meuwissen, Kim <kmeuwissen@chanhassenmn.gov>; Hokkanen, Laurie <lhokkanen@chanhassenmn.gov>; Potter, Jenny <jpotter@chanhassenmn.gov>; Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov> Cc: Ryan, Elise <eryan@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Avienda Development Planning Commission / Mayor Ryan, It was my understanding that the project was approved to address the retail needs that were addressed in the comprehensive plan. It looks like the project continues to be more aligned toward housing and moves further and further away from what was proposed. The city is once again pursuing changes to accommodate the developer and current market dynamics and moving away from the original goals of the project and compliance with the comprehensive plan. My question is this, do we feel the comprehensive plan no longer addresses the long term needs of the residents of Chanhassen and therefore changes need to be made to address the needs of the residents? Or rather are we making amendments to the comprehensive plan to address the ever evolving needs of the developer. The lack of movement on the project and continued public meetings seem to indicate the later. Eric Swanson 1440 Bethesda Cir Chanhassen, MN 55317 438 From: tburnsfam <tburnsfam@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 12:56 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@chanhassenmn.gov> Subject: Submitting Written Comments for Aug 16th Meeting Kate, please let me know if this is in proper form to share copies with the Commission for Tuesday's meeting, or if I need to drop off or mail. Thank you! -Cathy Burns To: Planning Commission Staff RE: Avienda Application consideration, August 16th, 2022 I have several concerns about the recent proposal for Avienda, but cannot attend the city meeting. My concerns are about consistency with the original plan; homebuyers vs. renters; density; traffic; and blending with the neighborhood. The Plan Initially, the physical center of the project was retail. It’s understandable & practical to move retail to the roadway. However, from the site map, it looks like section 2, now dedicated to apartments, is a much larger area than what was initially allocated to all multi-unit housing. For someone who has not looked closely at the project for a couple of years, it seems like a dramatic departure from the original mission. I ask you to consider not only the project and density vs. code, but also vs. the original and earlier revised proposals—as many people in the abutting neighborhoods bought homes and settled in Chanhassen based upon earlier approvals, on descriptions of an upscale retail and office development with about 20% residential, and a small portion of a subset section being apartments. As a layperson who read the Avienda mission statement and prospectus years ago with faith that the developer and city will largely follow that mission, it did not occur to me that so much – 80% -- of the residential area would be apartment rentals. I did not know that “Multi-density” was a euphemism for “High-density.” I naively assumed that the development would mirror the current composition of Chanhassen, which is a mix of single family, townhome, twin, senior, and apartment housing, seemingly in that order. As someone who has not followed the project closely, but trusted when I bought my home that the interests of existing taxpayer / residents would be considered equally to a reasonable developer profit and the city’s desire to increase the tax base, I feel blindsided by how much the project has deviated from the original. Home-Owning Affordability Housing affordability is not just about subsidies. It flows from a balance of supply and demand. Currently there is an historic low in housing inventory. There are available apartments in and around Chanhassen, even in newly-built developments. Adding > 400 market-rate apartments will only exacerbate the problem—pricing out first-time homeowners, forcing them to continue renting, and making it difficult for seniors to downsize. As a parent of three young adults who rent apartments in other cities, rent because historic high prices stemming from low 439 inventory of for-sale property hinder buying, I see downsides to increasing rentals vs. affordable townhomes, twins etc. Market-rate rentals, at $2000-$2600 per month, equate to a mid-range $2300 mortgage payment on a $400,000 home (at 20% down, 5% interest, $200/month property tax, $100 insurance). Developing to increase available residential property for sale will increase supply and might lower our existing property values, but at least there is a societal benefit, in that increased supply should help young & lower-income people to become homeowners, invested for the long-term in our community. Density & Traffic At the Avienda presentation last night, the speaker estimated that 50% of the project was residential. And despite the fact that Avienda has been billed as an “Upscale Retail Development,” the speaker called the proposed 400+ apartment complex “The center of the project.” The original Development Design Standards (attached, p. 3) for Avienda proposed no more than 20% residential. In those standards, the following types of residential were outlined: • Multiple-family dwellings • Senior housing independent living and assisted • Single family homes (Density of 3-6 units an acre) • Townhomes, including detached townhomes and twin homes. The single-family and twin homes, which would mirror the existing area, as well as mitigate high density, are notably absent from the current proposal. Given three entrances/ exits to Avienda, and over 3000 parking spots, the high-density installation at Avienda could add 1000 cars--likely more than doubling the traffic along Bluff Creek Boulevard. There is already concern among neighbors about the safety of bicyclists, pedestrians, and kids at play along that street, where people access two stairways to the below- grade trail, as well as walk down the sidewalk to the park at Pioneer Pass. Will there be access, and even better, some kind of encouragement through signs, sidewalks, or trail connectors, for Avienda residents and visitors to access the city trail from Lyman Boulevard? Accessing the stairways on Bluff Creek Blvd and River Rock Dr S is already dangerous given the current amount of vehicular traffic. Further down the trail toward the high school, many people cross Lyman against traffic, with no crosswalk, at the intersection with Audubon at the Water Pump Station, instead of continuing down the sidewalk to the underpass that connects to the trail across Lyman. Would a connector from Avienda to the Water Pump area entrance to the trail and accentuating the section to the underpass help alleviate both the danger of crossing Lyman and the congestion along Bluff Creek Blvd between River Rock and Bluff Creek Dr.? 440 Did the recently done traffic study include counting cars at various times of day and days of the week? I have not seen a tracking cable across any of the local streets. Fitting in with Existing Neighborhood Four hundred apartments in one portion of the Avienda lot represents a huge deposit of a new type of housing. It does not fit or integrate with the developments to the west: The Preserve at Bluff Creek; Camden Ridge; Pioneer Pass; Liberty on Bluff Creek. How many homes/units are within those four developments? Five hundred? Six hundred? These existing developments and their publicly-accessible amenities (such as the park at Pioneer Pass) are spread out across much more land than proposed residences at Avienda. The large complex of apartments does not fit the area and could overwhelm existing resources and infrastructure. Those existing developments west of Avienda have substantial green space such that they integrate with the wetlands and the rural/suburban feel that drew many of us to Chanhassen. Liberty on Bluff Creek, the highest-density of the neighborhoods along Bluff Creek Blvd & Drive, has a lot of green space around and between the rows of townhomes. What is the hard-surface coverage percentage proposed at Avienda? Will it integrate with the neighboring area? Did the developer, at the outset, do field testing and canvas neighbors? Is there a point where the project has so veered from the original mission that this needs to be readdressed? (Beyond the mid-summer presentation given with one-week notice). Understanding that property owners have rights to develop land that they own within the parameters of city needs and code, should their developments not also be acceptable to the community? And integrate with, if not fit with the feel of, the existing neighborhood? It would be different if Avienda were just abutting our neighborhood, with no access. However, because one of the three main arteries through the development continues through our neighborhood, it would be nice to see as seamless an integration – not just transition – as possible. I understand the goals to make Chanhassen more walkable and bring in more residents. However, apartments are more transient, not as invested in the community as are homeowners. And higher density scale increases congestion and hinders walkability. Finally, is the revised Avienda project so huge that it could draw away from Chanhassen city center? Is a goal to develop a second city center, a Chan South? (An urban area abutting a single-family residential area and wetlands?) Thank you for considering my concerns! -Cathy Burns River Rock Dr. S, Chanhassen Carver County Housing Study (shows 590 market-rate apartments need through 2040) https://chanhassen.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=1&meta_id=12252 Avienda Development Design Standards (re: 20-30% residential) https://www.chanhassenmn.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/1270/637863379814700877 G:\PLAN\2017 Planning Cases\17-10 Avienda Preliminary Plat & PUD\2022 Amended Avienda PUD\Email from residents 441 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Landform Professional Services LLC – Planning Case No. 2022-12, Avienda Request for amending the Planned Unit Development of 118+/- acres of property zoned Planned Unit Development-Regional Commercial District (PUD-RC) including Exhibit A Avienda Design Standards for the property located at the southwest corner of Powers Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard. On August 16, 2022, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Landform Professional Services LLC to amend the Planned Unit Development-Regional Commercial (PUD-RC) zoning. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development – Regional Commercial District (PUD-RC). 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Office or Regional Commercial uses. 3. The legal description of the property is: The plat of Avienda, Carver County, Minnesota. 4. REZONING The proposed amendment meets the required standards for approval: a. The proposed zoning has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan subject to the amendment of the comprehensive plan permitting additional density within the regional commercial land use area. b. The proposed zoning is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed zoning conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d. The proposed zoning will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. DocuSign Envelope ID: A0F1D9CA-34E4-40B4-A0C3-DAEDB9766573 442 e. The proposed zoning can be accommodated with existing and planned public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f. Traffic generation by the proposed use within the zoning district is within capabilities of streets serving the property. g. Adding 53-row homes between the townhomes and the apartments h. Increasing the number of apartments from 250 units to 417 units i. Provide flexibility to combine the two, 150-unit senior housing developments to one 300-unit building at the southwest corner or develop as shown j. Allow southern senior building location to be up to five stories (if buildings are combined) k. The northerly senior housing would be required to be a retail use if not senior housing l. Adds full-service car wash as a permitted use in District 3 m. Shows potential locations for three to four additional drive-throughs (beyond the four already approved) but does not seek approval at this time n. The Planning Commissions encourages the City Council to fully consider and value the size, location, and configuration of the gathering place as an integral part of the project o. The planning report #2022-12 dated August 16, 2022, prepared by Kate Aanenson, et al, is incorporated herein. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that City Council approve the Amendment of Planned Unit Development – Regional Commercial, PUD-RC as shown in plans dated July 15, 2022, plan 8.1. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 16th day of August, 2022. Chanhassen Planning Commission BY:___________________________________ Mark von Oven, Chairman DocuSign Envelope ID: A0F1D9CA-34E4-40B4-A0C3-DAEDB9766573 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Office (952) 466-5200 | Fax (952) 466-5223 | www.co.carver.mn.us CARVER COUNTY September 9th, 2022 City of Chanhassen c/o Kate Aanenson Community Development Director 952-227-1139 kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Re: Development/Access Review Comments: Avienda – Updated Traffic Memo Received 8-22-2022 Thank you for the opportunity to review the updated traffic memo relevant to the subject development plans in the City of Chanhassen. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval and as potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project: 1. Public Works is requesting an operations analysis for the Powers Blvd. and Bluff Creek Blvd. intersection with the new numbers from the updated traffic memo, this is to include a summary memo. 2. A new ICE report for the Lyman Blvd. and Sunset Trail intersection is still requested 3. Access permits are needed for both the Powers Blvd. and Lyman Blvd. intersections. 4. Updated plans should be submitted to Carver County Public Works for the Lyman Blvd. and Sunset Trail intersection per the last meeting between the applicant and Public Works. Intersection improvements are to be determined after the requested info is provided. CC: Steven Sabraski, SSabraski@landform.net Jack Johansen Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5283 jjohansen@co.carver.mn.us Angie Stenson AICP Sr. Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5273 astenson@co.carver.mn.us Darin Mielke PE Assistant Public Works Director Carver County Public Works 952.466.5222 dmielke@co.carver.mn.us 451 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item Resolution 2022-XX: Adopt the Preliminary Tax Levy, Budget and Establish the Truth-In-Taxation Public Hearing Date (ITEM POSTPONED TO SEPTEMBER 26, 2022) File No.Item No: G.3 Agenda Section GENERAL BUSINESS Prepared By Kelly Grinnell, Finance Director Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 452 ATTACHMENTS 453 City Council Item September 12, 2022 Item 2022 Building Permit Activity File No.Item No: J.1 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By Jenny Potter, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Correspondence Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 2022 Building Permit Activity August Year-to-Date 454 2022 Building Permit Activity August YTD l5 l0 l3Residential Single-Family 0 0 0 0Residential Tor,vnhomes 0 0 0 0Apartrnents/Senior Facilities l0 l3 38Total Resid€ntial 0 I 2Neu' 0 0Redeveloped0 l3 38Remodeledl5t0 40Total Commercial l6 l0 ll 16Single-Family Lots 't'l 88 Residenrial To\mhome Lots 53 53 53 130 t.1t 129Total AYailable Lots Available Lot Inventory of Quarter) I'r Qurrter 2d Quarter 3d Quarter 46 Quarter (end 49 40 98 38Singte-Family 55 56 l8 0 0 0Touriomest2 0026800I l0 62 66 74 40Commercial6758 t34 120 134 282 78Total Number of All Permits 202t2017 g:\admiDVorms\builditrg permit activity 2022 rtd-doc 4 St \0 [[ + \Y City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1100 Residential Buitding Permits l'i Querter 2d Quarter 3d Quarter 4th Quarter Total YTD l5 Commercial Building Permits l" Quarter 2d Quarter 3d Quarter 46 Quarter Total YTD I 0 Total Permit History 20r8 2019 2020 2022 68 Apartm€nts/Senior Facilities 431 455 9 :::== a:i:e ez i: aa a E e a a e zI E :8. ; EI :a! E=9 :. = !:=s : a I :, > i 3 1 t I z a s = t_ I 2 I5 a &: I I I I T I I III I llll I I I I I TI 6 ;-z:zz; l||l ;EnE6; .a: 456