The URL can be used to link to this page

06-13-2022 Agenda and PacketA.5:00 P.M. - WORK SESSION Note: Unless otherwise noted, work sessions are held in the Fountain Conference Room in the lower level of City Hall and are open to the public. If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. A.1 Fire Department/Public Safety Staffing Update A.2 Facilities Study Discussion A.3 Park Referendum Update (following regular meeting) A.4 Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS C.1 Announce New City of Chanhassen Website D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. D.1 Approve City Council Minutes dated May 23, 2022 D.2 Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated April 26, 2022 D.3 Receive Senior Commission minutes dated April 15, 2022 D.4 Approve Claims Paid dated June 13, 2022 AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JUNE 13, 2022 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 1 D.5 Approve Fireworks Permit for the Lake Minnewashta Homeowners Association Event Scheduled for July 3, 2022 D.6 Approve Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications for Erhart Farm and Resolution 2022-XX: Remove Property from the Rural Service District D.7 Resolution 2022-XX: Approve 2022 Skid Steer Replacement Purchases D.8 Resolution 2022-XX: Approve Settlement Agreement for Parcels 1 and 24 as part of CSAH 101 Improvement Project D.9 Resolution 2022-XX: Accept Donation from CenterPoint Energy for the Purchase of Replacement Ice Rescue Equipment D.10 Ordinance XXX: Adopt Amendments to City Code Chapter 13, Nuisances, and Chapter 20, Zoning E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda). E.1 CenterPoint Energy Community Safety Grant Presentation F.PUBLIC HEARINGS F.1 Resolution 2022-XX: Adopt Resolution Vacating a Portion of Public Drainage & Utility Easements within the Pat Cunningham Plat; Final Plat Approval, Development Contract Approval, and Approval of the Plans and Specifications G.GENERAL BUSINESS H.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS J.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION J.1 Maple Leaf Award for Dr. Dennis Peterson, Superintendent, Minnetonka Public Schools J.2 2022 Building Permit Activity - May Year-to-Date J.3 Letter from Mediacom J.4 Letter from the Metropolitan Council K.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. 2 That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 3 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Fire Department/Public Safety Staffing Update File No.Item No: A.1 Agenda Section 5:00 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY Fire Chief Don Johnson will provide an update on staffing issues and present Phase 2 and Phase 2.5 proposals for staffing. This is a continuation and follow-up to October 2021 discussions. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 4 ATTACHMENTS Fire Department Staffing Update 5 FIRE DEPT STAFFING UPDATE APRIL 11, 2022 6 Hiring Updates since December •(1) Firefighter resigned due to residency change •(1) Captain retired (16 Years of Service) •(2) Paid on Call Captains resigned to accept internal Firefighter position •(1) Paid on Call Assistant Chief retires in May (30 Years of Service) Will require backfill from POC Captain Position. •(1) Paid on Call Firefighter will be retiring November (30 Years of Service) Subtractions to POC staffing -6 7 Hiring Updates Continued •Extensive Outreach for vacant positions (Civic Plus, Electronic/Print Media, Focused Villager Articles, Signage, Word of Mouth) •Consideration of Non-Traditional Applicants •Partnership with Relief Association for Non- Traditional POC candidates to receive pension incentives Efforts Made in Recruitment 8 Recruitment Results Total Applicants = 18 •2 Applicants dropped after Orientation Night •7 Traditional Applicants •Chanhassen Resident with No Experience •Requires 1 Year of Training prior to working •9 Non-Traditional Applicants •Outside the 6 mile response radius •Some with Experience/Certifications •Some without experience or certifications By the Numbers 9 Process First Round Interviews = 16 •Firefighter Panel with Assistant City Manager Invited Back for 2nd Interview = 10 •Captains/Assistant Chiefs Conditional Offers Extended •Medical Physical/Psych Assessment/Criminal Background Check 10 Final Hiring Results Experienced, non-traditional firefighter -(1) Captain, (2) Firefighters •Schedule Impact within 30-45 days Traditional Chanhassen POC -(3) that require Fire Academy Training •Schedule Impacts January 2023 •(1) POC Candidate did not meet hiring conditions Conditional Offers Extended –April 4, 2022 11 How Does That Compare Chaska 14 Applicants, 7 Interviewed, 3 Hired Eden Prairie 43 Applicants, Hope to hire 10 Victoria 9 Applicants, 7 Interviewed, Hired 2 Excelsior 10 Applicants (3 non-traditional), 7 Interviewed, 3 Hired Prior Lake (Comparison City) Hiring 15 Full Time staff in 2023 12 Paid On Call Captain Results •Internal Applicants Applied = 3 •Internal Applicants Hired = 3 •Non-Traditional Placement = 1 Total POC Captain filled positions = 9 •Adverse Impacts Likely •POC, Assistant Chief Vacancy to fill •Moving to next Phase will likely impact this job class •No eligible or interested POC firefighters in que 13 Full Time Firefighter Hiring Results •8 internal candidates applied and participated with a first round interview •3 candidates were invited back for 2nd interview •2 candidates accepted the position with start date of April 4. 14 Current Coverage Hour of Day Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 7p 8p 9p 10p 11p Phase 1 Implemented April 1 General Alarms Full Time Staffing Coverage POC Duty Crew Staffing - Crew of 3 Full Time Day Staff Benefits •Covered 6-8am Gap Time during the week – •Dramatic improvement to response times during weekdays •Flexible scheduling for day staff •Addresses probable high demands on development/new construction plan reviews and inspections Not Addressed •Significant Gap Times remain that rely on General Alarms, 7 days a week •POC shifts on Weekend Days are most difficult to fill and most mandatories 15 Proposed Coverage Phase 2 Implementation Benefits •Eliminates Gap Times with either F/T or POC staffing –Critical Need •Adds (2) Fire Captains and changes schedule to 12h/7d a week for all (4) response FTEs •Elimination of weekend POC hours from 0800-1600 but adds back an 1800-2200 shift to cover gap time. •Availability for a POC Firefighter to work weekend hours will be made available. * Not providing POC hours on the weekends would provide a $26,000 budget surplus Hour of Day Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 7p 8p 9p 10p 11p Full Time Staffing Coverage Day Staff POC Duty Crew Staffing 16 Proposed Change for Consideration Paid on Call Fire Captain Position •Problematic and Demanding based on POC schedule demands •Requires hours of mentoring and experience to be effective •Current model is based on the scheduling demand versus organizational needs –Negative impacts on consistency •Difficult to build a candidate pool with the volatile turn over and position requirements •Supervising POC personnel can create undesirable challenges and has impacted retention and recruitment of this position Phase 2.5 –Operational Excellence 17 Phase 2.5 Coverage Hire (1) additional Fire Captain Benefits •Full time Supervisor 24/7 by adding (1) additional FTE to Phase 2 •Stability for constantly rotating crews •Significant administrative work currently handled by F/T and POC A/Chiefs and POC Captains could be delegated to a F/T Captain (Training Officer/Evals /Equipment Maintenance) •Take some pressure of Duty Chief response for low level calls Funding Strategy •Eliminate POC Captain Position from the schedule •$17.06 x 4,673 hours = $79,721 for partial funding of new position. (3) Full Time Captain 24/7 Full Time Staffing Coverage Day Staff (2) POC Duty Crew Staffing Hour of Day 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1p 2p 3p 4p 5p 6p 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 7p 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8p 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 9p 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10p 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 11p 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 SaturdaySundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFriday 18 Financial Implications Phase 2 = (2) Fire Captain FTEs $240,000 Phase 2.5 = (3) Fire Captain FTEs $280,279* $360,000 -$79,721 shifting from Temp Wages for reduction in POC Captain staffing hours. *Council could eliminate 3rd POC position on weekends and further reduce temp wages by $26,000 to offset cost increases. 19 Financial Offsets Moving to Phase 2/2.5 will dramatically impact call back and the necessity of Station 2 •Facility study indicates approximately $275,000 in CRITICAL deferred maintenance needs over next 5 years –Explore use agreement with Ridgeview Ambulance and close as a fire station. •2013 Fire Study, NFPA, APWA, and ISO recommendations require a replacement engine scheduled in 2023 ($950,000) -no longer necessary if not considered a fire station. •The Capital Costs that would likely impact levy can now be directed towards personnel costs and phased in levy impacts. Close Station 2 and Downsize Fleet 20 Opportunities to Consider Option 1: Implement Phase 2 or 2.5 Oct 1, 2022 •Savings from April 1, 2022 FTE hires •Immediate savings from POC Captain position elimination •Transition Fire Station 2 to Ridgeview Base (Transfer Building Utilities and Grounds Maint. Costs) •Elimination of Replacement Engine •Elimination of most multiple General Alarms that happen during Gap Times and ensure 24/7 staffed coverage Option 2: Implement Phase 2 or 2.5 in 1st Quarter 2023 •2023 Projected Budget include a $250,000 levy increase estimate for two additional positions •+ additional 0.5% Levy impact to fully fund Phase 2.5 Option 3: Take No Action 21 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Facilities Study Discussion File No.21-12 Item No: A.2 Agenda Section 5:00 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION Concurrence to place action of acceptance of the Final Study Document on the June 27, 2022 City Council regular meeting - General Business Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The work session discussion will be focused on two topics: 1. Is the Final Study Document ready for formal acceptance by the Council, or are there noted revisions or other elements that should be added? 2. Presentation of various newly developed site plan concepts surrounding the City Center area and the potential new City Hall by Hoisington Koegler. BACKGROUND The Facilities Study was started in August of 2021. The consultant team has provided an assessment of the facilities, reviewed future needs, developed concepts and costs for various options, and summarized the information in the attached report. The concepts developed primarily focused on City Hall, Fire Station #1, and the Rec Center. 22 The attached Draft-Final Study Document contractually fulfills the consultant's scope of work and at some point should be finalized and accepted by the City Council. The study document is merely a planning tool, and does not commit the City Council to any specific recommendation and/or project funding, although City Staff will use the direction received from the Council during the discussions surrounding the study in next-step planning efforts. The City also engaged a planning/landscape architecture firm to develop site plan options for a potential new City Hall located on the current site. The options were developed to show a sense of what could be for the City Center area and what other programs/amenities could be included with a new City Hall project. The development of the site plan options are not part of the original Facilities Study and therefore not included in the Final Study Document. DISCUSSION BUDGET N/A RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS City of Chanhassen Facility Master Plan Summary Report 23 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITY MASTER PLAN SUMMARY REPORT REVISED May 23rd, 2022 SNOW KREILICH ARCHITECTS, INC. 219 NORTH SECOND STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612 359 9430 SNOWKREILICH.COM CITY HALLCITY HALL FIRE STATION #1 FIRE STATION #2 RECREATION CENTERRECREATION CENTER OLD VILAGE HALL 24 INTRODUCTION CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ iMay 23rd, 2022 PROJECT OVERVIEW The City of Chanhassen owns and operates several facilities of various age and geographic location around the City. Based on varying age and condition of the facilities, along with the current and future needs of the City, a facilities planning study was conducted to determine feasible options and help guide decision making by the City Council. The completed Study will be an integral part of the City’s long-term strategic planning initiative. The objective of the Study is to develop options, and the associated costs of those options, on how the City could plan for its facilities now and into the future. The specific facilities anticipated to be included in this study includes City Hall, The Recreation Center, Fire Station 1, Fire Station 2 and the Old Village Hall Building. The study did not include a public outreach or engagement campaign as part of the work, but engagement with city staff, the City Council and key stakeholders will be needed. Each facility (including the site) was assessed through visual observation to prepare a summary that provides a baseline needs analysis, the general condition, operational efficiency, and listing of factors that may impact its future use. The facilities assessment study was paired with a master plan process to generate ideas about how City facilities could be repurposed or replaced to inform future planning and decision making for long term facilities management. 25 INTRODUCTION CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ iiiMay 23rd, 2022 INTRODUCTION ii ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL Elise Ryan: Mayor Dan Campion: Council Member Lucy Rehm: Council Member Haley Schubert: Council Member Jerry McDonald: Council Member CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES COMMITTEE Charles Howley, PE, LEED AP: Public Works Director/City Engineer Laurie Hokkanen: City Manager Matt Umacht: Assistant City Manager Rick Rice: IT Manager Kevin Zittel: Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Kelly Strey: Finance Director Don Johnson: Fire Chief Jerry Ruegemer: Parks and Recreation Director Kate Aanenson: Community Development Director ASSESSMENT AND MASTER PLANNING TEAM Matthew Kreilich, FAIA: Design Principal, Snow Kreilich Architects James Howarth, AIA: Project Manager/Architect, Snow Kreilich Architects Tim Kittila, PE: Facilities Assessment Manager, Kraus-Anderson Michael Pierson: Facilities Assessment Specialist, Kraus-Anderson Dustin Phillips, MCSM: Senior Project Manager, Kraus-Anderson Jason Rentmeester, LEED AP: Senior Project Manager, Kraus-Anderson PREPARED FOR: The City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 26 0.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ vMay 23rd, 2022 0.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS iv ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 5.0 APPENDIX A. PROJECT SCHEDULE 5.1 B. DETAILED SITE & BUILDING SPACE USE PROGRAM DOCUMENTS FOR EACH FACILITY 5.3 1. City Hall: Space Analysis 5.3 City Hall (Continued) 5.4 City Hall (Continued) 5.5 2. Recreation Center: Space Analysis 5.6 Recreation Center (Continued) 5.7 3. Fire Station #1: Space Analysis 5.8 4. Fire Station #2: Space Analysis 5.9 C. MEETING NOTES 5.10 END OF DOCUMENT 5.92 1.0 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS A. PROJECT SCOPE 1.1 B. FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT 1.3 C. MASTER PLANNING PROCESS 1.5 D. SCHEDULE 1.5 1. Facility Assessment: Phase One 1.5 2. Master Planning: Phase Two 1.5 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 B. FACILITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS 2.2 C. DELIVERABLES 2.2 3.0 MASTER PLAN A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3.1 B. MASTER PLAN PROCESS 3.2 C. DELIVERABLES 3.3 D. COST ESTIMATE PROCESS 3.4 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT 1 B. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MASTER PLAN 1 27 1.0 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 1.2May 23rd, 2022 1.0 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 1.1 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 1.0 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS A. PROJECT SCOPE Snow Kreilich and Kraus-Anderson completed the facility assessment and master planning effort as described in the project introduction. The first phase of work included the facilty assessment scope of work. The primary focus of the work was to evaluate and make recommendations for these five facilities identified by the City of Chanhassen. 1. City Hall a. 7700 Market Blvd. b. Original construction date 1981, expansion in 1988 c. Approximately 31,600 SF d. Home to the Senior Center and various City Departments including administration, engineering, planning, building, finance, fire and Carver County Sheriff* e. Scope: High level assessment of service life, space planning, options for remodel/ expansion/demolition *Offices only, no jail or other policing facilities. The City contracts with the Carver County Sheriff for policing services. 2. Recreation Center (connected to Bluff Creek Elementary School) a. 2310 Coulter Blvd. b. Original construction date 1995 c. Approximately 23,000 SF d. Home to recreation staff and recreational/fitness activities e. Scope: High level assessment of service life, space planning, options for remodel/ expansion/demolition. 3. Fire Station #1 a. 7610 Laredo Dr. b. Original construction date 1967, expansion in 1988 c. Approximately 16,700 SF d. Home to fire vehicles, equipment and duty crew e. Scope: High level assessment of service life, space planning, options for remodel/ expansion/demolition or for centralized facility** 4. Fire Station #2 a. 6400 Minnewashta Pkwy. b. Original construction date 1989 c. Approximately 3,000 SF d. Home to fire vehicles and equipment e. Scope: High level assessment of service life, space planning, options to maintain and/or for centralized facility 5. Old Village Hall a. 391 W. 78th St. b. Original construction date 1896 c. Approximately 600 SF d. Home to the Chanhassen Historical Society via lease agreement with the City e. Scope: High level assessment of service life. STRATEGIC PARTNERS STRATEGIC PLAN 1. Project key goals • Evaluate City owned facilities and properties• Develop multiple options for consideration and long term planning to support the City’s strategic plan.• Support public works and the City Council by providing clear and concise ideas and data to develop a long term, big picture master plan for City maintenance, improvements, and/or consolidations. 2. Critical scope deliverables • City Public Works, Staff and City Council engagement • Facility overview and operational assessment• Evaluation of all City owner property and facilities with a specific focus on these five buildings:1. City Hall2. Fire Station #13. Fire Station #24. Recreation Center (at Bluff Creek Elementary)5. Old Village Hall 3. Engagement with Key Stakeholders Our team recognizes the importance of strategic partnerships that help implement your current City services and operations and how those partnerships can further advance and support your future goals. • Eastern Carver County Schools (ISD 112) »Kraus-Anderson’s facilities assessment team is currently working with ISD 112 to review and evaluate their property and buildings (including the Bluff Creek Elementary Building and site where the City of Chanhassen Recreation Center is located) »Our team also has familiarity and prior project experience working with ISD 112 on projects such Chanhassen High School, Chaska High School, Chaska Middle School East, and Victoria Elementary School • Carver County »Partnership with Carver County Sheriff’s Office for public safety services »Partnership with Carver County Parks for recreation services and shared events 1 FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT 3 DEVELOPMENT & REDEVELOPMENT 4 OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE 5 COMMUNICATIONS 28 1.0 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 1.4May 23rd, 2022 1.0 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 1.3 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 • Identify all deferred maintenance and upcoming facility expenditures and digitize the findings into a consolidated and detailed report • Itemize and prioritize deferred maintenance and facility expenditure items and develop a comprehensive deferred maintenance list for the facilities • Identify cost estimates associated with either repair, replacement or upgrades that coincide with each identified depreciable asset item that will either be a deferred maintenance item or upcoming facility expenditure • Analyze and consolidate cost estimate information and provide summary cost information on a 5-year (and 20-year) plan basis • Present and review itemized facility expenditures and maintenance plan and list of prioritization recommendations and review with key facility personnel and decision makers • Develop assessment report content • Present and review assessment report and facility expenditures and maintenance plan with City of New Prague directors and/or board • Modify/update final assessment report based on City of New Prague input and prioritization direction In addition to the reporting of the existing facilities conditions, Kraus- Anderson will provide recommendations around the following items: • Sustainability recommendations • Energy efficiency recommendations and possible cost savings • Safety and security upgrades • Code compliance/ADA regulations In addition, Kraus-Anderson provided high-level analysis and recommendations of potential identification of harmful materials and possible indoor air-quality concerns. Detailed testing of these will need to be verified by third-party consultants (not included in this initial phase). B. FACILITIES CONDITION ASSESSMENT The facility conditions assessment included a comprehensive review of the facilities inclusive of the following: • Complete site interviews of key facility personnel currently managing and maintaining the facility to gather all pertinent information regarding the facilities and surrounding properties • Complete a non-destructive, visual inspection, detailed site visit to review the property and existing building systems conditions inclusive of the following disciplines and areas: A. 02-Site Work: Site lighting, transformer, parking lots, storm water, curb, green space, playgrounds, etc. B. 03- Building Structure: Non-engineering review of structure- identify points of concern C. 04- Foundation/Slab-on-Grade: Basements, loading docks, slabs, etc. D. 05- Exterior Enclosure: Façades, exterior walls, exterior doors, windows, building penetrations E. 06- Roofs: Roof review, roof drainage, flashing, coping, etc. F. 07- Interior Construction: interior walls and doors, ceiling tile, flooring, rooms, kitchen, restrooms, specialty areas (common spaces, media centers, etc.) G. 08- FF&E: Kitchen equipment, lockers, office, common areas, facility associated items H. 09- Special Construction: Pools, data centers, etc. I. 10- Conveyance: Elevators, escalators, chair lifts, etc. J. 11- Fire Protection: Protection, detection, panels K. 12- Plumbing Systems: Water Heaters, softeners, sumps, sewer, etc. L. 13- HVAC: Heating, Ventilation, cooling, boilers, AHU’s, etc. M. 14- Controls: DDC, Pneumatic, Lighting N. 15- Electrical: Switchgear, Generators, ATS, lighting O. 16- A/V: Communications P. 17- Technology, Electronic Safety/Security: LV systems, IT, Card Access, DAS, Cameras 29 1.0 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 1.6May 23rd, 2022 1.0 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 1.5 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 C. MASTER PLANNING PROCESS The master planning process focused on analysis of the facility assessment process information and generating potential opportunities for accommodating future growth and long term goals for each facility. • Complete site interviews of key department personnel currently using the facility spaces to gather all pertinent information regarding the facilities, surrounding properties, and projected growth in City services and department staff. • Complete a digital analysis of the existing facility spaces including a space use program document identifying all building spaces, areas, and adjacencies. • Create site and building diagrams to analyze opportunities for remodeling, building additions or new replacement facilities based on information gathered during the facility assessment process, program analysis and in response to City Staff’s projected future needs. D. SCHEDULE Approximate durations for the project are identified here. A graphic ‘gant’ chart style schedule is included in the appendix for reference. 1. Facility Assessment: Phase One 1.1 Inventory Existing Conditions : August - September 2021 1.2 User Engagement Surveys : October - November 2021 1.3 Synthesize Assessment Data : December 2021 - January 2022 2. Master Planning: Phase Two 2.1 Programming Analysis : January 2022 2.2 Concept Graphics and Idea Tests : February 2022 2.3 ROM Pricing and Presentation of Findings : March 2022 2.4 City Council Update : April 2022 2.5 Summary Report Complete : May 2022 30 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.2May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.1 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Conduct a facility assessment of five (5) City Facilities • Identified / estimated deferred maintenance and upcoming facility expenditures for the next 10 years »Estimates are on depreciable assets and does not account for adequacy / space re-design • Measured based on the International Facility Management Association (IFMA) Facility Condition Index (FCI) scale »City Hall & Fire 2 measured in the “critical range” • Facility Condition Assessment proved that buildings are not in a “divest” stage at this time (per FCI measurements) »Reinvestment in these facilities could be beneficial, if buildings meet current needs • Facilities assessment shows that buildings are structurally sound and adequately maintained »+/- $8M Estimated investment over the next 10 years to continue operations as-is • City hall has considerable adequacy issues that may complicate reinvestment for its intended use based on the original design • The Recreation Center is unable to meet the growing demand and shifts of current recreational needs for the city population • Fire station #1 has limitations for space, but overall facility in fair condition • Fire Station #2 may no longer serve the city in a beneficial manner for its intended purposes • Old Village Hall: Limited investment, serves current needs B. FACILITY ASSESSMENT PROCESS • Understand the total costs for each facility • Facilities are measured based upon IFMA Standard to calculate the FCI = Facility Condition Index • It’s a way to measure: Is the facility worth the investment? C. DELIVERABLES “Digitized Site Report” • Identified issue, location, condition and description / pictures • All findings are numbered FCI =Deferred Maintenance Deficiences Building Replacement Costs 31 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.4May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.3 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 • “Estimate and Priorities spreadsheet” • Carries the item’s from digitized site report • Also includes items discussed from site interview • All items are then estimated, prioritized, given a criticality, and then placed in proper year for replacement (RUL) What do we investigate? SUBSTRUCTURES SHELL/EXTERIOR MEP SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT INTERIORS CONVEYANCE SPECIALTY CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SITEWORK 32 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.6May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.5 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 0 0 00 011111 PROCESS / DATA WEB LINK -City of Chanhassen Facility Condition Assessments FCI: PRIORITY ONE 0-5 YEARS FCI = CRITICAL DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $4,003,640 FCI = FAIR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $836,594 FCI = CRITICAL DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $289,375 FCI = POOR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $1,855,585 FCI = POOR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $69,125 0.36200.08820.30140.22490.1728CITY HALL FIRE STATION #1 FIRE STATION #2RECREATION CENTER OLD VILAGE HALL SUBTOTAL (ALL 5) = $6,695,819 33 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.8May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.7 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 19 01 FCI = (0.36) CRITICAL DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $4M (5 years)$700k (10 years)0.3620General Information: -Built in 1980 -Major remodel / building projects: »1988 »1996 »2004 Current Use: -City services and administration -Council chambers -Sheriff’s Department -Senior Center Building Area: -+/-32,000 GSF Deferred Maintenance: -HVAC »Replace furnaces »Fix ventilation issue (Vey humid during the day) »Replace Aircon fancoil unit in server room -Exterior Enclosure »Exterior windows need to be replaced »Kalwall skylights need to be replaced -Roof »Roof is scheduled to be replaced in 2023 -Interior Construction »New flooring, casework and wall touch up in multiple spaces »Remove high density file storage racks »Update restrooms -Site Work »Replace stone pavers around the facility. »Mill and overlay of the parking lots »Review joints and sealant in parking ramp (leaking) -Plumbing »Replace some water heaters »Domestic water main entering the building City Hall 34 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.10May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.9 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 20 Site Overview:CITY HALL -Exterior Enclosure »Exterior windows need to be replaced »Kalwall skylights need to be replaced -Roof »Roof is scheduled to be replaced in 2023 -Site Work »Replace stone pavers around the facility. »Mill and overlay of the parking lots »Review joints and sealant in parking ramp (leaking) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1 3 4 5 5 5 5 6 2 6 4 2 / 3 35 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.12May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.11 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 21 Building / Interior: 36 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.14May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.13 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 22 • Minimal / no insulation used • No barrier to air infiltration / leakage • Outdated technology / does not meet current code required minimum performance levels • Interior side insulation has higher potential for mold growth / wall deterioration 1980 Perlite Board R2.7 / 1”) R= 4.05 Rigid Foam (R3-4 / 1”) R= 4.5 - 6 Rigid Foam (R4-5 / 1”) R= 8 - 10 air leakage / high condensation & frost potential air leakage / high condensation & frost potential air leakage / high condensation & frost potential 1988 1996 User Comfort / Operational Efficiency: 37 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.16May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.15 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 23 Lower Level DEPARTMENT ADJACENCIES Upper Level DEPARTMENT ADJACENCIES BUILDING STORAGE SENIOR CRAFTS SENIORS SENIORSSHARED CONFERENCE SHARED CONF. KITCHEN SERVER ROOM FACILITIES OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT CITY ADMINISTRATION IT DEPT. PARKS & RECREATION Space Utilization / Layout: 38 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.18May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.17 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 24 Experience: -Site wayfinding -Entrances / security -Complicated interior circulation -User comfort (heating and cooling) -User privacy and acoustics -Council chambers layout and public accessibility Projected Growth (5-10 years): -Department needs • Admin • IT • Finance • Building • Planning • Parks • Engineering • Fire • Senior • Sheriff Total = +1-2 FTE +2 FTE +1-2 FTE +1 FTE +.5 FTE +1-2 FTE + 2 FTE +2 FTE +1 FTE +2-4 FTE +13.5 - 18.5 Observations: -General maintenance -ADA compliance -Moisture intrusion / water leaks -Equipment upgrades -Functional updates -Cosmetic updates City Hall Summary and Projected Growth: 39 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.20May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.19 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 25 City Hall Summary and Projected Expenditures: $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 City Hall Year 2023 Year 2024 Year 2025 Year 2026 Year 2027 Year 2028 Year 2029 Year 2030 Year 2031 Year 2032 40 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.22May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.21 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 28 FCI = (0.23) POOR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $1.9M (5 years)$250k (10 years) 01 0.2249General Information: -Built in 1995 -Major remodel / building projects: »N/A Current Use: -ISD 112 partnership -Community resource Building Area: -+/-22,800 GSF Deferred Maintenance: -Exterior Enclosure »Replace handicap doors in front entrance »Replacement of windows -Roof »Replace roof for the warming house (ballasted portion only) -HVAC »Replace condensing units »Boiler replacement »Replace Air Handling Units -Special Construction »Replace basketball hoists »Replace non –functioning dividing wall in the gym -Interior Construction »Refurbish of gym, locker rooms, aerobics room, fitness room and meeting rooms »Ceiling replacement throughout »Replace interior doors -Sitework/Building Earthwork »Update skating rink lighting »Mill and overlay of parking lot »Assess the drainage issue onsite »Repair of tennis and pickle ball courts Recreation Center 41 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.24May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.23 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 29 WARMING HOUSE / PICNIC SHELTER ICE RINK ICE RINK PARKING 30 STALLS (+5 HC) PARKING 130 STALLS TENNIS PICKLE BALL MULTI- PURPOSE FIELDS RECTANGULAR FIELDS RECTANGULAR FIELDS RECTANGULAR FIELDS DIAMOND FIELDDIAMOND FIELD DIAMOND FIELD DIAMOND FIELD DIAMOND FIELD DIAMOND FIELD RECREATION CENTER -Exterior Enclosure »Replace handicap doors in front entrance »Replacement of windows -Roof »Replace roof for the warming house (ballasted portion only) -Site Work »Update skating rink lighting »Mill and overlay of parking lot »Assess the drainage issue onsite »Repair of tennis and pickle ball courts 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1 4 5 6 7 2 3 65 Site Overview: 42 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.26May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.25 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 30 Observations: -General maintenance -Site grading / drainage -Sight line / privacy issues -Storage needs -Warming house -Functional updates -Cosmetic updates Building / Interior: 43 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.28May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.27 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 31 • Cavity insulation used (Typical of building age) • Limited barrier to air infiltration / leakage (discontinuous) • Outdated technology / does not meet current code required minimum performance levels 1994 Extruded Polystyrene Board R5 / 1”) R= 10 air leakage / high condensation & frost potential User Comfort / Operational Efficiency: 44 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.30May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.29 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 32 CONF. ROOM STORAGE LOCKERSGYMNASIUM + BLEACHERS DANCE ROOM FITNESS ROOM MEETING ROOM MEETING ROOM MEETING ROOM MEETING ROOM REC.VENDOFF. Projected Growth: -Additional Gymnasium space -Pickle ball (indoor and outdoor demand) -Staff increase Desired Growth: -Outdoor Ice rink (refrigerated) -Splash Pad / Pool -Possible consolidation with senior center Space Utilization / Layout: 45 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.32May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.31 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 33 Recreation Center Summary and Projected Expenditures: $- $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000 Rec Center Year 2023 Year 2024 Year 2025 Year 2026 Year 2027 Year 2028 Year 2029 Year 2030 Year 2031 Year 2032 46 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.34May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.33 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 36 01 0.0882FCI = (0.09) FAIR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $875K (5 years)$260k (10 years) General Information: -Built in 1973 -Major remodel / building projects: »1988 »2020 Current Use: -Fire Department Building Area: -+/-15,100 GSF Deferred Maintenance: -Roof »Roof has been replaced recently. Next replacement later in the plan -Exterior Enclosure »Clean and seal of exterior brickwork »Replace main entry doors and aluminum windows »Kalwall skylight replacement -Interior Construction »Recoat bay flooring »Update racquetball court to LED lighting »Replace flooring and ceiling tiles throughout -Site Work »Replace concrete drive for trucks to enter and exit the station »Mill and overlay of parking lot »Regrade north side of the building (Water pooling up) -Building Structure »Cracking in the hose tower »Equipment Furniture »Replace pneumatic compressor »Replace washing equipment »Replace furniture and casework -HVAC »Replace antiquated Roof Top Units »Add Destrat fans in bays 3 & 4 Fire Station #1 47 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.36May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.35 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 37 CITY HALL OFFICES FIRE #1 -Exterior Enclosure »Clean and seal of exterior brickwork »Replace main entry doors and aluminum windows »Kalwall skylight replacement -Roof »Roof has been replaced recently. Next replacement later in the plan -Site Work »Replace concrete drive for trucks to enter and exit the station »Mill and overlay of parking lot »Regrade north side of the building (Water pooling up) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1 4 5 66 7 2 3 3 6 3 Site Overview: 48 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.38May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.37 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 38 Observations: -General maintenance -ADA compliance -Equipment upgrades -Site grading / drainage -Skylight repair -Functional updates -Cosmetic updates Building / Interior: 49 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.40May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.39 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 39 • Cavity insulation used (Typical of building age) • Limited barrier to air infiltration / leakage (discontinuous) • Outdated technology / does not meet current code required minimum performance levels 19881988 Extruded Polystyrene Board R5 / 1”) R= 10 air leakage / high condensation & frost potentialuninsulated steel column - exposed to weather and subject to frost / ice build-up air leakage at batt insulation / high condensation & mold potential User Comfort / Operational Efficiency: 50 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.42May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.41 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 40 Main Level: +/- 10,500 gsf Lower Level: +/- 4,600 gsf Projected Growth: -Review location and response time implications -Additional office spaces -Storage + training program space -Full time staff increase -Review 2013 Fire Department Study and long term operational plans TRAINING ROOM LOCKERS RACQUETBALL APPARATUS AIR PACK TOOLS LNDRY DISPATCH L.CL. CREW CREW CREWKITCHENLOUNGE OFFICE HOSE TOWER STORAGE APPARATUS FITNESS STORAGE OFFICE Space Utilization / Layout: 51 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.44May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.43 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 41 Fire Station #1 Summary and Projected Expenditures $- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 Fire Station 1 Year 2023 Year 2024 Year 2025 Year 2026 Year 2027 Year 2028 Year 2029 Year 2030 Year 2031 Year 2032 52 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.46May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.45 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 42 010.3014FCI = (0.31) CRITICAL DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $275K (5 years)$10k (10 years) General Information: -Built in 1980 -Major remodel / building projects: »N/A Current Use: -Fire Department Building Area: -+/-3,000 GSF Deferred Maintenance: -Site Work »Sealcoat of parking lot -HVAC »Replace unit heaters and condenser unit -Exterior Enclosure »Repair frame of garage door »Replace exterior door from bay -Interior Construction »Polished/Epoxy flooring in the fire hall »Update living room space »Update restrooms -Roof »Asphalt roof in good shape -Plumbing »Irrigation is original to building »Replace some water heaters and water softeners Fire Station #2 53 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.48May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.47 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 43 FIRE #2 -Exterior Enclosure »Repair frame of garage door »Replace exterior door from bay -Roof »Asphalt roof in good shape -Site Work »Sealcoat of parking lot 1. 2. 3. 4. 1/2 43 1 2 3 Site Overview: 54 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.50May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.49 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 44 Observations: -General maintenance -ADA compliance -Hose tower safety concerns -Equipment upgrades -Functional updates -Cosmetic updates Building / Interior: 55 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.52May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.51 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 45 Projected Growth: -Review 2013 Fire Department Study and long term operational plans -No growth anticipated at this station KITCHENETTE FURNACE LOUNGEA107 MEN A105 APPARATUS BAY A100 LAUNDRY / TOOL A101 HOSE TOWER A102 OFFICE A103 WOMEN A104 MECHANICALA108 J.C.A106 Space Utilization / Layout: 56 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.54May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.53 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 46 Fire Station #2 Summary and Projected Expenditures $- $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 Fire Station 2 Year 2023 Year 2024 Year 2025 Year 2026 Year 2027 Year 2028 Year 2029 Year 2030 Year 2031 Year 2032 57 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.56May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.55 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 48 010.1728FCI = (0.18) POOR DEFERRED MAINTENANCE $70K (5 years)$10k (10 years) General Information: -Built in 1900 -Major remodel / building projects: »relocated to current site Current Use: -Historical Society Building Area: -+/-500 GSF Deferred Maintenance: -Sitework/Building Earthwork »Many missing bricks in the walkway, repair these areas. (May need to regrade some areas) -HVAC »Replace furnace »Replace small condenser unit -Exterior Enclosure »Replace windows »Exterior paint on building is starting to chip -Interior Construction »Upgrade flooring walls and ceiling -Special Construction »Chimney is starting to deteriorate -Plumbing »Replace electric water heater Old Village Hall 58 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.58May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.57 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 49 -Exterior Enclosure »Replace windows »Exterior paint on building is starting to chip -Roof »Chimney is starting to deteriorate »Bell tower damaged -Site Work »Many missing bricks in the walkway, repair these areas. (May need to regrade some areas) »Trim trees at building 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ` 6. Site Overview:OLD VILLAGE HALL 1/234 5 6 6 5 3 59 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.60May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.59 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 50 Space Utilization / Layout: Observations: -Adequate for current use -Historic Artifact / Community Asset HISTORICAL SOCIETY A100 JAIL A101 TOILET A103 CANDY COUNTER FURNACE 60 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2.62May 23rd, 2022 2.0 FACILITY ASSESSMENT 2.61 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 51 Old Village Hall Summary and Projected Expenditures: $- $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 Old Village Hall Year 2023 Year 2024 Year 2025 Year 2026 Year 2027 Year 2028 Year 2029 Year 2030 Year 2031 Year 2032 61 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.2May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.1 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Evaluate current and potential alternate locations for Facilities • Explore options to accommodate future needs and changing demographics »Evaluate pros / cons of re-using existing facility structures, remodeling or adding new building additions »Evaluate pros / cons of building new replacement facilities • Identify City goals for sustainability and operational efficiency • Evaluate pros / cons to identify strategies that can align with City mission, goals, and long term plans • Generate cost estimates for alternatives that can be compared with Facility Assessment cost data to inform City long term financial planning and investments Through a collaborative process working with the Facilities Committee and City staff the project team explored the following options for each of the five facilities studied: 1. City Hall a. Stay in Place: Remodel / Building Addition b. New Facility on City Owned Property c. New Facility at alternate location (new City Campus) 4. Recreation Center (connected to Bluff Creek Elementary School) a. Stay in Place: Remodel / Building Addition b. New Facility at alternate location (new City Campus) 3. Fire Station #1 a. Stay in Place: Remodel / Building Addition b. New Facility on City Owned Property c. New Facility at alternate location (new City Campus) 4. Fire Station #2 a. Prepare for alternate use: Remodel / fix accessibility issues and deferred maintenance projects 2. Old Village Hall a. Maintain current use: Deferred maintenance project(s) B. MASTER PLAN PROCESS • Work completed January - March 2022 »Create space needs program documents to evaluate current use, facility efficiency, and plan for future expansion needs »Explore site plan options for each facility (stay in place vs. move to new location) »Explore building plan options to evaluate the pros and cons of remodeling vs. building new »Generate a series of Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimates to help budget and plan future projects based on City priorities` • Identified potential project options for evaluation / prioritization • Transferred knowledge, Estimated 10-year project plans for all five properties What do we investigate? WAYFINDING CODE & ACCESSIBILITY PARKING CONSTITUENT EXPERIENCE ENVIRONMENT STAFF EXPERIENCE GREEN SPACE PROJECT PLANNING & BUDGET 62 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.4May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.3 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 C. DELIVERABLES • Notes from user engagement meetings and discussions • Detailed site and building space program documents for each facility • Digital plan drawings to show conceptual approaches to each facility • Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost ranges to inform budgeting for future projects • Knowledge Transfer 129 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 26890 NSF 130 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.19 131 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 31935 GSF 132 AREA BY DEPARTMENT # OF STAFF NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL 133 SUPPORT 5971 22.21% 134 CIRCULATION 6902 25.67% 135 CITY ADMINISTRATION 12 2879 10.71% 136 SUPPORT / IT 3 555 2.06% 137 PARKS & REC 6 658 2.45% 138 PLANNING 5 765 2.84% 139 FINANCE 4 711 2.64% 140 ENGINEERING 13 1593 5.92% 141 SHERIFF 8 903 3.36% 142 BUILDING 9 2015 7.49% 143 FIRE DEPARTMENT 5 548 2.04% 144 SENIOR COMMISSION 3 3390 12.61% 145 TOTAL FTE 68 26890 100.00% 146 POTENTIAL NEW PROGRAM AREAS QTY TOTAL NSF147 ADMINISTRATION OFFICES CITY ADMINISTRATION 2 130 260148 IT OFFICES SUPPORT / IT 2 130 260149 FINANCE OFFICES FINANCE 2 130 260150 BUILDING OFFICES BUILDING 1 130 130151 PLANNING OFFICES PLANNING 1 130 65152 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS & REC 2 130 260153 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 2 130 260 154 FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT 2 130 260155 SENIOR SENIOR COMMISSION 1 130 130156 SHERIFF SHERIFF 4 130 520 157 CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPORT 800158 EXPANDED COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY ADMINISTRATION 800159 RESTROOMS SUPPORT 1000160 STORAGE SUPPORT 1200 161 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 6205 NSF 162 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.30 163 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 8067 GSF 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study 4 of 4 130 AREA BY DEPARTMENT # OF STAFF NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL 131 SUPPORT 5971 22.64% 132 CIRCULATION 6902 26.17% 133 CITY ADMINISTRATION 12 2879 10.92% 134 SUPPORT / IT 3 555 2.10% 135 PARKS & REC 6 658 2.49% 136 PLANNING 5 765 2.90% 137 FINANCE 4 711 2.70% 138 ENGINEERING 13 1593 6.04% 139 SHERIFF 8 903 3.42% 140 BUILDING 9 2015 7.64% 141 FIRE DEPARTMENT 5 548 2.08% 142 SENIOR COMMISSION 3 2875 10.90% 143 TOTAL FTE 68 26375 100.00% 144 POTENTIAL NEW PROGRAM AREAS QTY TOTAL NSF 145 ADMINISTRATION OFFICES CITY ADMINISTRATION 2 130 260146 IT OFFICES SUPPORT / IT 2 130 260147 FINANCE OFFICES FINANCE 2 130 260148 BUILDING OFFICES BUILDING 1 130 130149 PLANNING OFFICES PLANNING 1 130 65150 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS & REC 2 130 260151 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 2 130 260152 FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT 2 130 260153 SENIOR SENIOR COMMISSION 1 130 130154 SHERIFF SHERIFF 4 130 520 155 CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPORT 800156 EXPANDED COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY ADMINISTRATION 800157 RESTROOMS SUPPORT 1000 158 STORAGE SUPPORT 1200 159 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 6205 NSF 160 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.30 161 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 8067 GSF 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study 4 of 4 UP ADAPTIVEGYMNASIUM STORAGE CORRIDOR STORAGE ISDGYMNASIUM CONFERENCE OFFICE OFFICE COMMUNITYGYMNASIUM LOCKERS STORAGE MULTI-PURPOSEROOM CONFERENCE RESTROOMS CORRIDOR COMMUNITYGYMNASIUM LOBBY RECEPTIONOFFICE HALL STAIR JANITOR STORAGE SHOWERS LOCKERROOM LCKR ENTRY TOILET TOILET LCKR ENTRY LOCKERROOM SHOWERS CORRIDOR DANCE ROOM FITNESSROOM MEETINGROOM MEETINGROOM MEETINGROOM MEETINGROOM VENDING VESTIBULE 8'16'4'2'0' Potential Project Scope EXISTING REMODEL NEW CONSTRUCTION D. COST ESTIMATE PROCESS Kraus-Anderson assisted with pre-construction estimation for the Master Plan Project scopes. Conceptual plans generated the Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimates to help inform decision making and provide cost ranges for each potential project explored. The cost estimate process was intended to help the City understand a rough estimate cost range to budget for each facility and key future milestones. The Cost information refers to the following industrty standard terms and definitions to help clarify all aspects that the project costs need to consider. »Hard Costs - “Often referred to as “brick-and-mortar costs,” and refer to any costs associated with the physical construction of the building or project,Under any equipment used, and any labor associated with the construction of the project.” »Soft Costs - “An expense item that is not considered direct construction cost. Soft costs can include architectural, engineering, financing, and legal fees, and other pre- and post-construction expenses. »Owner Costs - “Includes land acquisition costs, financial cost (funding cost), owner’s third party costs including engineering studies, permits, licensing fees, training, insurance, etc.” »Project Cost - “The complete investment cost which includes hard costs, soft costs, owner costs and escalation” »Escalation - “The term most often used in a construction cost estimate to represent anticipated future change in costs over time.” 63 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.6May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.5 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY HALL 64 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.8May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.7 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 17 Experience: -Site wayfinding -Entrances / security -Complicated interior circulation -User comfort (heating and cooling) -User privacy and acoustics -Council chambers layout and public accessibility Projected Growth (5-15 years): -Department needs • Admin • IT • Finance • Building • Planning • Parks • Engineering • Fire • Senior • Sheriff Total = +1-2 FTE +2 FTE +1-2 FTE +1 FTE +.5 FTE +1-2 FTE + 2 FTE +2 FTE +1 FTE +2-4 FTE +13.5 - 18.5 Observations: -General maintenance -ADA compliance -Moisture intrusion / water leaks -Equipment upgrades -Functional updates -Cosmetic updates City Hall Summary and Projected Growth: 65 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.10May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.9 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 18 City Hall - Site Program Analysis CHANHASSEN CITY HALL CAMPUS LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes CITY HALL CAMPUS - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT A 16,800 0.39 2 GREEN SPACE B 110,500 2.54 Includes some drive lane area (approximated) 3 PARK / OUTDOOR PLAZA C 51,200 1.18 4 SKATE PARK D 26,000 0.60 5 OUTDOOR RINK E 20,000 0.46 6 EAST PARKING LOT (Lower Level)F 20,500 0.47 52 CARS 7 EAST PARKING LOT (Upper Level)G 8,500 0.20 24 CARS 8 WEST PARKING LOT (Upper Level)H 37,300 0.86 93 CARS 9 WEST PARKING LOT (Lower Level)H 37,300 0.86 26 CARS Library covered parking 10 TOTAL SITE AREA 328,100 7.53 195 PARCEL SIZE BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 11 SITE AREA RATIO 66.32%33.68%Green space / 67.00% impervious LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER AREA (SF)Capacity Area / Person Notes CITY HALL CAMPUS - BUILDING DETAILED PROGRAM 12 LOWER LEVEL 13 ELEVATOR CIRCULATION 105 14 STAIR #1 CIRCULATION 115 15 STAIR #2 CIRCULATION 107 16 STAIR #3 CIRCULATION 115 16 RESTROOMS #1 SUPPORT 232 17 RESTROOMS #2 SUPPORT 272 18 RESTROOMS #3 SUPPORT 91 19 JANITORS CLOSET #1 SUPPORT 58 20 JANITORS CLOSET #2 SUPPORT 35 21 MECHANICAL #1 SUPPORT 205 22 ELECTRICAL / IT #1 SUPPORT / IT 268 23 MECHANICAL #2 SUPPORT 100 24 ELECTRICAL #2 SUPPORT 70 25 ELECTRICAL #3 SUPPORT 150 26 MAIN BUILDING STORAGE SUPPORT 2175 27 STORAGE SUPPORT 320 28 FACILITIES OFFICE CITY ADMINISTRATION 240 1 240 29 COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY ADMINISTRATION 1275 30 STAFF BREAK ROOM AREA SUPPORT 150 31 SENIOR CENTER SENIOR COMMISSION 1550 50 31 32 SENIOR CENTER OFFICE SENIOR COMMISSION 95 1 95 33 SENIOR CENTER KITCHENETTE SENIOR COMMISSION 145 2 72.5 34 FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPORT 870 35 MAPLE ROOM SENIOR COMMISSION 900 20 45 36 MAPLE ROOM OFFICE SENIOR COMMISSION 85 1 85 37 MAPLE ROOM CLOSET SENIOR COMMISSION 15 38 MAPLE ROOM KITCHENETTE SENIOR COMMISSION 85 2 42.5 39 KITCHEN SENIOR COMMISSION 515 40 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 145 41 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 145 42 HALLWAY CIRCULATION 630 43 HALLWAY CIRCULATION 900 44 IT HALLWAY CIRCULATION 109 45 HALLWAY CIRCULATION 513 46 BASEMENT FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 12785 47 LOWER LEVEL GROSS SQUARE FEET 15375 GSF PROGRAM SUMMARY 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study 1 of 4 Goals: -Clearly identified / simplified main entrances -Parking +100 additional parking stalls based on proposed building expansion / future growth Summary Data: -~7.5 Acres -~17,000 SF Building footprint -195 Parking stalls -33% Open space, 67% impervious 66 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.12May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.11 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 19 Potential Remodel / Site Improvement Project Scope: 1 1 Building Area 1. 16,800 SF Site Area 1. 6.68 acres (290,800 SF) Site Parking 1. New Parking »City Hall Calculated Need = 137 »Library Calculated Need = 76 »Total Required = 213 »Total Provided = 195 Potential Improvements 1. Major Remodel 2. New Building Addition 3. Public Area and New Entry 4. New Parking »Projected Need = 288 »+93 Stall Increase 2 2 4 3 67 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.14May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.13 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 20 FUTURE CITY HALL FIRE #1 GREEN SPACE Potential New Campus Reorganization (option 1): Building Footprint Area 1. 18,000 SF Site Area 1. 6.68 acres (290,800 SF) Site Parking 1. New Parking »City Hall Calculated Need = 137 »Library Calculated Need = 76 »Total Required = 213 »Total Provided = 195 Potential Improvements 1. New Building »2-3 Story City Hall / Senior Center »+/-45 stalls below grade parking 2. Below grade parking / loading entrance 3. New Surface Parking »+/- 50 stalls 40 102 POTENTIAL NEW ACCESS ROAD 68 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.16May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.15 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 21 FIRE #1 FUTURE CITY HALL GREEN SPACE Potential New Campus Reorganization (option 2): 50 Building Footprint Area 1. 18,000 SF Site Area 1. 6.68 acres (290,800 SF) Site Parking 1. New Parking »City Hall Calculated Need = 137 »Library Calculated Need = 76 »Total Required = 213 »Total Provided = 195 Potential Improvements 1. New Building »2-3 Story City Hall / Senior Center »+/-45 stalls below grade parking 2. Below grade parking / loading entrance 3. New Surface Parking »+/- 50 stalls 2 69 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.18May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.17 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 22 City Hall - Building Program Analysis 129 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 26890 NSF 130 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.19 131 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 31935 GSF 132 AREA BY DEPARTMENT # OF STAFF NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL 133 SUPPORT 5971 22.21% 134 CIRCULATION 6902 25.67% 135 CITY ADMINISTRATION 12 2879 10.71% 136 SUPPORT / IT 3 555 2.06% 137 PARKS & REC 6 658 2.45% 138 PLANNING 5 765 2.84% 139 FINANCE 4 711 2.64% 140 ENGINEERING 13 1593 5.92% 141 SHERIFF 8 903 3.36% 142 BUILDING 9 2015 7.49% 143 FIRE DEPARTMENT 5 548 2.04% 144 SENIOR COMMISSION 3 3390 12.61% 145 TOTAL FTE 68 26890 100.00% 146 POTENTIAL NEW PROGRAM AREAS QTY TOTAL NSF 147 ADMINISTRATION OFFICES CITY ADMINISTRATION 2 130 260 148 IT OFFICES SUPPORT / IT 2 130 260 149 FINANCE OFFICES FINANCE 2 130 260 150 BUILDING OFFICES BUILDING 1 130 130 151 PLANNING OFFICES PLANNING 1 130 65 152 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS & REC 2 130 260 153 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 2 130 260 154 FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT 2 130 260 155 SENIOR SENIOR COMMISSION 1 130 130 156 SHERIFF SHERIFF 4 130 520 157 CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPORT 800 158 EXPANDED COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY ADMINISTRATION 800 159 RESTROOMS SUPPORT 1000 160 STORAGE SUPPORT 1200 161 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 6205 NSF 162 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.30 163 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 8067 GSF 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study 4 of 4 70 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.20May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.19 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 23 Lower Level DEPARTMENT ADJACENCIES Upper Level DEPARTMENT ADJACENCIES BUILDING STORAGE SENIOR CRAFTS SENIORS SENIORSSHARED CONFERENCE SHARED CONF. KITCHEN SERVER ROOM FACILITIES OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMBERS FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT CITY ADMIN. IT DEPT. PARKS & RECREATION Existing Space Utilization / Layout (By Department): 71 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.22May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.21 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 24 UP UP REF.REF.REF.UP UNEXCAVATED LOWERLOBBY STAIR B JANITOR FACILITIES OFFICE STORAGE BUILDING STORAGE CORRIDOR CORRIDOR STAIR C ELEV MECH CORRIDOR ELEC ELECMECH MAPLE ROOM OFFICEVESTIBULE CORRIDOR KITCHENETTE WOMENS MENS VESTIBULE KITCHEN KITCHEN STORAGE MENS WOMENS FOUNTAIN ROOM CLOSET CORRIDOR SENIORCENTER OFFICE VESTIBULE CORRIDOR STAFF BREAK ROOM STAIR A COUNCIL CHAMBERS MECH TECH ROOM IT SERVERS FOYER WOMENS MENS JANITOR ELEVATOR CLOSET CLOSET SENIOR WORKSHOP DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT SENIOR CENTER SHARED CONFERENCE STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0'CORRIDORCORRIDORKITCHENETTEUP UP REF.REF.REF.UP UNEXCAVATED LOWERLOBBY STAIR B JANITOR FACILITIES OFFICE STORAGE BUILDINGSTORAGE CORRIDOR CORRIDOR STAIR C ELEV MECH CORRIDOR ELEC ELECMECH MAPLE ROOM OFFICEVESTIBULE CORRIDOR KITCHENETTE WOMENS MENS VESTIBULE KITCHEN KITCHEN STORAGE MENS WOMENS FOUNTAIN ROOM CLOSET CORRIDOR SENIOR CENTER OFFICE VESTIBULE CORRIDOR STAFF BREAKROOM STAIR A COUNCIL CHAMBERS MECH TECH ROOM IT SERVERS FOYER WOMENS MENS JANITOR ELEVATOR CLOSET CLOSET SENIOR WORKSHOP DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT SENIOR CENTER SHARED CONFERENCE STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0'CORRIDORCORRIDORKITCHENETTEDN DN DN DN DN DN DN ROOF BELOW ROOFBELOW VESTIBULE STAIR B LOBBY OPEN WORK(3)EVIDENCEFIRE CHIEFFIRE OFFICE (2 DESKS)) VESTIBULE CORRIDOR CLOSET FIRE OFFICE (2 DESKS) WOMENS MENS BUILDING INSPECTION(5 WORK STATIONS) CORRIDOR COPY INTERVIEW STORAGE SHERIFF OFFICE CORRIDOR PLAN ROOM OFFICE SHERIFFOPEN WORK (2) TRAINING /OPEN WORK (4) OFFICE OFFICE ENG CONFERENCE STAIR C COPY CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OPEN WORK (2) CORRIDOR OFFICE MANAGER OFFICE ENG / FINLOBBY OPEN WORK (4) HIGH DENSITYFILES OFFICE PLANNINGCONFERENCE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OPEN OFFICE(2) MAIN LOBBY LOBBY RECEPTION VESTIBULESTAIR A OFFICE (2 WORK STATIONS) OFFICE OPEN OFFICE(4) OFFICE COPY MENS WOMENS CORRIDOR COURTYARD COURTYARDCONFERENCE FOYER WOMENS MENS JANITOR ELEVATOR PLANTER PLANTER IT DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SHARED CONFERENCE STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0' COPY OFFICE STORAGE OPEN WORK (2) OFFICE COUNTER FILES KITCHENFILES DN DN DN DN DN DN DN ROOF BELOW ROOFBELOW VESTIBULE STAIR B LOBBY OPEN WORK(3)EVIDENCEFIRE CHIEFFIRE OFFICE (2 DESKS)) VESTIBULE CORRIDOR CLOSET FIRE OFFICE(2 DESKS) WOMENS MENS BUILDING INSPECTION(5 WORK STATIONS) CORRIDOR COPY INTERVIEW STORAGE SHERIFF OFFICE CORRIDOR PLAN ROOM OFFICE SHERIFF OPEN WORK (2) TRAINING / OPEN WORK (4) OFFICE OFFICE ENG CONFERENCE STAIR C COPY CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OPEN WORK (2) CORRIDOR OFFICE MANAGER OFFICE ENG / FIN LOBBY OPEN WORK(4) HIGH DENSITYFILES OFFICE PLANNINGCONFERENCE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OPEN OFFICE(2) MAIN LOBBY LOBBYRECEPTION VESTIBULESTAIR A OFFICE (2 WORK STATIONS) OFFICE OPEN OFFICE(4) OFFICE COPY MENS WOMENS CORRIDOR COURTYARD COURTYARDCONFERENCE FOYER WOMENS MENS JANITOR ELEVATOR PLANTER PLANTER IT DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SHARED CONFERENCE STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0' COPY OFFICE STORAGE OPEN WORK (2) OFFICE COUNTER FILES KITCHENFILES DN DN DN DN DN DN DN ROOFBELOW ROOF BELOW VESTIBULE STAIR B LOBBY OPEN WORK (3)EVIDENCEFIRE CHIEFFIRE OFFICE(2 DESKS)) VESTIBULE CORRIDOR CLOSET FIRE OFFICE (2 DESKS) WOMENS MENS BUILDINGINSPECTION (5 WORK STATIONS) CORRIDOR COPY INTERVIEW STORAGE SHERIFF OFFICE CORRIDOR PLAN ROOM OFFICE SHERIFF OPEN WORK(2) TRAINING / OPEN WORK(4) OFFICE OFFICE ENGCONFERENCE STAIR C COPY CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OPEN WORK(2) CORRIDOR OFFICE MANAGEROFFICE ENG / FIN LOBBY OPEN WORK(4) HIGHDENSITY FILES OFFICE PLANNING CONFERENCE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OPEN OFFICE (2) MAIN LOBBY LOBBYRECEPTION VESTIBULESTAIR A OFFICE (2 WORKSTATIONS) OFFICE OPEN OFFICE (4) OFFICE COPY MENS WOMENS CORRIDOR COURTYARD COURTYARD CONFERENCE FOYER WOMENS MENS JANITOR ELEVATOR PLANTER PLANTER IT DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SHARED CONFERENCE STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0' COPY OFFICE STORAGE OPEN WORK(2) OFFICE COUNTER FILES KITCHENFILES Lower Level DEPARTMENT ADJACENCIES Upper Level DEPARTMENT ADJACENCIES Existing Space Utilization / Layout: 72 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.24May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.23 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 25 UP UP REF.REF.REF.UP UNEXCAVATED LOWERLOBBY STAIR B JANITOR FACILITIES OFFICE STORAGE BUILDING STORAGE CORRIDOR CORRIDOR STAIR C ELEV MECH CORRIDOR ELEC ELECMECH MAPLE ROOM OFFICEVESTIBULE CORRIDOR KITCHENETTE WOMENS MENS VESTIBULE KITCHEN KITCHEN STORAGE MENS WOMENS FOUNTAIN ROOM CLOSET CORRIDOR SENIORCENTER OFFICE VESTIBULE CORRIDOR STAFF BREAKROOM STAIR A COUNCIL CHAMBERS MECH TECH ROOM IT SERVERS FOYER WOMENS MENS JANITOR ELEVATOR CLOSET CLOSET SENIOR WORKSHOP DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT SENIOR CENTER SHARED CONFERENCE STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0'CORRIDORCORRIDORKITCHENETTEDN DN DN DN DN DN DN ROOF BELOW ROOFBELOW VESTIBULE STAIR B LOBBY OPEN WORK(3)EVIDENCEFIRE CHIEFFIRE OFFICE(2 DESKS)) VESTIBULE CORRIDOR CLOSET FIRE OFFICE(2 DESKS) WOMENS MENS BUILDING INSPECTION (5 WORK STATIONS) CORRIDOR COPY INTERVIEW STORAGE SHERIFF OFFICE CORRIDOR PLAN ROOM OFFICE SHERIFF OPEN WORK (2) TRAINING / OPEN WORK (4) OFFICE OFFICE ENG CONFERENCE STAIR C COPY CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OPEN WORK (2) CORRIDOR OFFICE MANAGER OFFICE ENG / FIN LOBBY OPEN WORK(4) HIGHDENSITY FILES OFFICE PLANNINGCONFERENCE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OPEN OFFICE(2) MAIN LOBBY LOBBYRECEPTION VESTIBULESTAIR A OFFICE (2 WORK STATIONS) OFFICE OPEN OFFICE(4) OFFICE COPY MENS WOMENS CORRIDOR COURTYARD COURTYARDCONFERENCE FOYER WOMENS MENS JANITOR ELEVATOR PLANTER PLANTER IT DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SHARED CONFERENCE STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0' COPY OFFICE STORAGE OPEN WORK (2) OFFICE COUNTER FILES KITCHENFILES DN DN DN DN DN DN DN ROOFBELOW ROOF BELOW VESTIBULE STAIR B LOBBY OPEN WORK (3)EVIDENCEFIRE CHIEFFIRE OFFICE(2 DESKS)) VESTIBULE CORRIDOR CLOSET FIRE OFFICE (2 DESKS) WOMENS MENS BUILDINGINSPECTION (5 WORKSTATIONS) CORRIDOR COPY INTERVIEW STORAGE SHERIFF OFFICE CORRIDOR PLAN ROOM OFFICE SHERIFF OPEN WORK(2) TRAINING / OPEN WORK(4) OFFICE OFFICE ENGCONFERENCE STAIR C COPY CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OPEN WORK(2) CORRIDOR OFFICE MANAGEROFFICE ENG / FIN LOBBY OPEN WORK (4) HIGHDENSITY FILES OFFICE PLANNING CONFERENCE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE CORRIDOR OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OPEN OFFICE (2) MAIN LOBBY LOBBY RECEPTION VESTIBULESTAIR A OFFICE (2 WORK STATIONS) OFFICE OPEN OFFICE (4) OFFICE COPY MENS WOMENS CORRIDOR COURTYARD COURTYARD CONFERENCE FOYER WOMENS MENS JANITOR ELEVATOR PLANTER PLANTER IT DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SHARED CONFERENCE STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0' COPY OFFICE STORAGE OPEN WORK(2) OFFICE COUNTER FILES KITCHENFILES Lower Level DEPARTMENT ADJACENCIES Upper Level DEPARTMENT ADJACENCIES DN DN DN DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT SHARED CONFERENCE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0' OFFICE STORAGE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE PLOTTER /PLAN ROOM COPY OPEN WORK AREA COUNTER / OPEN WORK STORAGE CONFERENCE RECEPTION /OPEN WORK COPY Room OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE STORAGE OFFICE COURTYARD OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE STORAGE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE INTERVIEW EVIDENCE STORAGE OPEN WORKAREA OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE STORAGE OFFICE CONFERENCERECEPTION / OPEN WORK STORAGE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE MAIN ADMINLOBBY OPEN WORKAREA COPY OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OPEN WORK AREA STORAGE OFFICE OFFICE OPEN WORKAREA OFFICEOFFICE STORAGE OFFICE OFFICE STORAGE STORAGE SHAREDCONFERENCE SHAREDCONFERENCE SHARED CONFERENCE STAIR B CORRIDOR VESTIBULE CORRIDOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR STAIR A CORRIDOR CORRIDORCORRIDOR CORRIDORVESTIBULE ELEVATOR IT ROOM IT ROOM STAIR C WOMENS MENS WOMENS MENS WOMENS MENS STAIR D IT ROOM JANITOR OPEN TO LOBBY BELOW VESTIBULE BELOW OPEN TO BELOW (FUT. OFFICE) (FUT. OFFICE)(FUT. OFFICE) (FUT. OFFICE) (FUT. OFFICE) DOWN TO LOWER LEVELCORRIDOR STORAGESTORAGESTORAGESTORAGE(FUT. OFFICE)REF.REF.UP UP DEPARTMENT LEGEND ADMINISTRATION IT SENIOR CENTER STORAGE SUPPORT RESTROOMS CIRCULATION 8'16'4'2'0' COUNCILCHAMBER A/V & STORAGE COUNCILCHAMBERS COUNCIL LOBBY IT SERVER ROOM FACILITIESOFFICE SENIORCENTER SENIOR CENTER SENIORCRAFTS KITCHEN BUILDING STORAGE STORAGE ELEC MECH ELEC MECH WOMENS MENS MENS WOMENS STORAGE KITCHENSTORAGE JANITOR JANITOR STORAGE STAIR D PUBLIC LOBBY CORRIDOR STAIR C CORRIDOR CORRIDOR STAIR B VESTIBULE ELEVATOR CORRIDOR CORRIDOR VESTIBULE WOMENS MENS STAIR A (2 STORY) UNEXCAVATED CORRIDORCORRIDORProposed Remodel + Addition Utilization / Layout: 73 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.25 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.26May 23rd, 2022 May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 54 City Hall Summary and Budget Data: Option One: Remodel & Addition Project (at existing property) ROMProjectCost(2024) 1. Hard Costs Range $11M - $13M 2. Soft / Owner Costs Range $3M - $4M 3. Land Acquisition $0M 4. Total Costs Range $14M - $17M Escalation [2027 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 12% (0.12) 2. Total Costs Range $16M - $19M Escalation [2030 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 24% (0.24) 2. Total Costs Range $17M - $21M *Project costs only - does not include costs for temporary relocation / leased space required during construction Option Two: New Building Project (on City Owned Land) ROMProjectCost(2024) 1. Hard Costs Range $16M - $19M 2. Soft / Owner Costs Range $4M - $5M 3. Land Acquisition $0M 4. Total Costs Range $20M - $24M Escalation [2027 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 12% (0.12) 2. Total Costs Range $22M - $27M Escalation [2030 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 24% (0.24) 2. Total Costs Range $25M - $30M 74 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.28May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.27 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 RECREATION CENTER 75 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.30May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.29 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 27 OHW 877.0 OHW 699.2 OHW 896.3 OHW 865.3 OHW 944.5 OHW 956.1 OHW 881.8 OHW 955.5 OHW 993.6 OHW945.2 OHW 932.77 OHW 929.8 Lotus Lake Lake Riley Lake Minnewashta Lake Lucy Rice Lake Lake Susan Lake Ann Lake Virginia Lake Harrison Rice Marsh Lake Clasen Lake Lake St Joe Christmas Lake Lyman B l v d (CSAH18) Lyman Blvd (CSAH 18)Pion e e r Trail (C S AH 14) (C S A H 6 1 )F ly in g C lo u d D riv ePowersBlvd(C.R.17)AudubonRoad(CSAH15)State Hig h w a y 1 0 1Hwy101GreatPlainsBlvd Hwy 101Gr e at Pl ainsBlvdState Hwy 5 S ta te H w y 5 Arboretum Boulevard Highway 41GalpinBlvd.(C.R.117)State Hwy 5 S ta te H w y 7 Hazeltine Blvd (Hwy 41)Chanhassen Rd. Hwy. 101AudubonRoad(C S A H 6 1 )F ly in g C l o u d D rMinnewashtaPkwyGalpinBlvd(C.R.15)£¤212 £¤212 £¤212 PowersBlvd(C.R.17)Bluff Creek DrBluffCreekBlvd Ü Legend City Owned Property Greater than an Acre Date: 7/19/2018 K:\NickLH\Projects\PW\Engineering\ForVanessa\2018\July\City_Owned_Property.mxd City owned Property over an Acre 0 4,000 8,0002,000 Feet CITY HALL / PARKS & RECREATION OFFICES & SENIOR CENTER REC CENTER 76 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.32May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.31May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 28 Eden Prairie: 184,000 SF - pop. 63,000 -Ice arena, aquatics, gymnasium, fitness center, meeting rooms Replacement Chanhassen: 135,000 SF - pop. 26,000 -Ice arena, walking track, senior gathering, fitness, gymnasium, meeting rooms Chaska: 128,000 SF - pop. 24,500 -Ice arena, aquatics, senior gathering, theater, gallery, fitness, gymnasium Victoria: 112,000 SF - pop. 11,000 -Ice arena, gymnasium, walking track, fitness center, meeting space Minnetonka: 64,000 SF - pop. 53,100 -Banquet facilities, senior gathering, meeting rooms, craft rooms Expanded Chanhassen: 40,000 SF - pop. 26,000 -Meeting rooms, fitness, gymnasium (expansion + walking track) Chanhassen: 23,000 SF - pop. 26,000 -Meeting rooms, fitness, gymnasium Relevant Similar Facilities 77 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.34May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.33 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 30 Recreation Center Goals: -Expanded parking -Expanded pickleball -Refrigerated outdoor ice sheet -Gymnasium, locker and fitness program area expansion -Office remodeling -Stormwater issues addressed Summary Data: -~30 Acres • 14.77 = ISD 112 • 16.02 = City -~22,600 SF Rec Center building footprint -288 Parking stalls • 125 Stalls = ISD 112 • 163 Stalls = City -79% Open space, 21% impervious CHANHASSEN RECREATION CENTER LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes CHANHASSEN RECREATION CENTER - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT 22,600 0.52 2 WARMING HOUSE 2,000 0.05 3 GREEN SPACE 76,000 1.74 3 MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS 633,000 14.53 4 OUTDOOR RINKS 55,000 1.26 5 TENNIS / PICKLE BALL 60,000 1.38 3 CARS 6 PARKING LOT 50,270 1.15 160 CARS 7 TOTAL SITE AREA 898,870 20.63 PARCEL SIZE BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 8 SITE AREA RATIO 21.12%78.88%Green space / 21.12% impervious LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER Capacity Area / Person Notes CHANHASSEN RECREATION CENTER - BUILDING DETAILED PROGRAM LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER AREA (SF)Capacity Area / Person Notes 9 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL 10 COMMUNITY GYMNASIUM RECREATION 200 7325 300 24.41667 11 RECEPTION OPERATIONS 206 115 3 38.33333 12 OFFICE OPERATIONS 206.1 80 1 80 13 CONFERENCE OPERATIONS 207 435 8 54.375 14 SHIPS LADDER CIRCULATION 208 60 15 JANITOR CLOSET SUPPORT 209 125 16 STORAGE SUPPORT 210 300 17 SHOWER SUPPORT 212 100 18 LOCKER SUPPORT 213 225 19 TOILET SUPPORT 214 290 20 TOILET SUPPORT 215 290 21 LOCKER SUPPORT 216 225 22 SHOWER SUPPORT 217 100 23 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 218 1600 24 VENDING SUPPORT 219 100 25 AEROBICS / DANCE RECREATION 220 1485 26 FITNESS RECREATION 221 1360 27 MEETING ROOM COMMUNITY 222 1050 28 MEETING ROOM COMMUNITY 223 1050 29 MEETING ROOM COMMUNITY 224 1050 30 MEETING ROOM COMMUNITY 225 1050 31 FOYER CIRCULATION 226 1650 32 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 227 100 33 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 20165 34 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 20165 NSF 35 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.12 36 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 22600 GSF PROGRAM SUMMARY 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 1 of 2 78 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.36May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.35 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 31 WARMING HOUSE / PICNIC SHELTER ICE RINK ICE RINK PARKING 30 STALLS (+5 HC) PARKING 130 STALLS TENNIS PICKLE BALL MULTI- PURPOSE FIELDS DIAMOND FIELD DIAMOND FIELDDIAMOND FIELD DIAMOND FIELD DIAMOND FIELD DIAMOND FIELD RECREATION CENTER 4 5 6 2 3 Potential Remodel / Site Improvement Project Scope: Building Area 1. 22,600 SF 2. 2,000 SF (Warming House) Green Space 2. 76,000 SF 3. 633,000 SF (Play Fields) Parking / Impervious Area 3. 50,270 SF (Rec Center Parking +/-160 stalls) 4. 55,000 SF (Ice Rinks) 5. 60,000 SF (Pickle Ball) Site Area 6. 21.67 acres (943,870 SF) Site Area Ratio 7. +/-75% green space 8. +/-25% impervious Potential Improvements 1. Expanded Parking (+25 Stalls) 2. Expanded Pickleball 3. Ice Refrigeration Building 4. Gymnasium Recreation Center Addition 5. Operations Remodeling 6. Regrade site and realign athletic field areas 1 79 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.38May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.37 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 32 Recreation Center - Building Program Analysis 34 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 20165 NSF 35 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.12 36 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 22600 GSF 37 AREA BY DEPARTMENT # OF STAFF NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL AREA / STAFF 38 OPERATIONS 4 630 3.12%157.5 39 SUPPORT 1755 8.70% 40 RECREATION 10170 50.43% 41 COMMUNITY 4200 20.83% 41 CIRCULATION 3410 16.91% 42 TOTAL FTE 4 20165 100.00% 0 43 POTENTIAL NEW PROGRAM AREAS QTY 44 EXPANDED GYMNASIUM 1 7500 Expanded Gym, 1 competition court, 2 cross courts, Indoor Pickleball equipment 45 STAFF OFFICE 1 150 46 STAFF OFFICE 1 100 47 CONFERENCE ROOM 1 500 48 EXPANDED LOCKER AREA 1 800 49 RESTROOMS 1 600 50 MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM 1 1000 50 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 11250 NSF 51 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.20 52 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 13500 GSF 03.17.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 2 of 2 80 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.40May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.39 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 33 UP COMMUNITYGYMNASIUM LOBBY RECEPTIONOFFICE HALL CONFERENCE STAIR JANITOR STORAGE SHOWERS LOCKERROOM LCKR ENTRY TOILET TOILET LCKR ENTRY LOCKERROOM SHOWERS CORRIDOR DANCE ROOM FITNESSROOM MEETING ROOM MEETINGROOM MEETING ROOM MEETING ROOM VENDING VESTIBULE ADAPTIVE GYMNASIUM STORAGE CORRIDOR STORAGE ISD GYMNASIUM 8'16'4'2'0' Projected Growth: -Additional Gymnasium space -Pickle ball (indoor and outdoor demand) -Staff increase Desired Growth: -Outdoor Ice rink (refrigerated) -Splash Pad / Pool -Possible consolidation with senior center Space Utilization / Layout: 81 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.42May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.41 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 34 UP ADAPTIVE GYMNASIUM STORAGE CORRIDOR STORAGE ISD GYMNASIUM CONFERENCE OFFICE OFFICE COMMUNITYGYMNASIUM LOCKERS STORAGE MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM CONFERENCE RESTROOMS CORRIDOR COMMUNITYGYMNASIUM LOBBY RECEPTIONOFFICE HALL STAIR JANITOR STORAGE SHOWERS LOCKERROOM LCKR ENTRY TOILET TOILET LCKR ENTRY LOCKERROOM SHOWERS CORRIDOR DANCE ROOM FITNESSROOM MEETING ROOM MEETINGROOM MEETING ROOM MEETING ROOM VENDING VESTIBULE 8'16'4'2'0' Potential Project Scope EXISTING REMODEL NEW CONSTRUCTIONOffice Remodel -Office = 100 SF -Office = 150 SF -Small Conference = 200 SF Building Addition -Gymnasium = +/- 7,500 SF -Conference = 500 SF -Expanded Lockers and Restrooms = 1,400 SF -Multi-Purpose Room = 1,000 SF Potential Remodel Project: 82 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.44May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.43 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 36 Site Program Key Components WARMING HOUSE TENNIS / PICKLEBALL NEW BUILDING ICE SKATING PLAZA BASEBALL / SOFTBALL PARKING SOCCER / FOOTBALL PARK / OPEN SPACE OUTDOOR AQUATICS 83 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.46May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.45 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 37 New Community Center Goals: -Better Serve the Community -Expanded Programming -Tailored to the specific needs of the users -Owned and Operated by the City of Chanhassen New Site Components: -Turf Field(s) -Skate Park -Outdoor Aquatics Program -Outdoor trails (walking / ice trail options) Summary Data: -~50 Acres -~130,000 SF Rec Center Building Footprint -300 Parking Stalls -70% Open Space, 30% Impervious CHANHASSEN COMMUNITY CENTER (FUTURE) LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes CHANHASSEN COMMUNITY CENTER - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT 127,936 2.94 2 WARMING HOUSE 2,000 0.05 3 GREEN SPACE / STORMWATER POND 700,000 16.07 4 TURF SOCCER / FOOTBALL FIELD 86,400 1.98 5 MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS 633,000 14.53 Replacement area to match existing 6 MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS (30% EXPANSION)189,900 4.36 7 OUTDOOR SKATE PARK 30,000 0.69 1 refrigerated outdoor sheet, 1 seasonal sheet 8 OUTDOOR RINKS 100,000 2.30 1 refrigerated outdoor sheet, 1 seasonal sheet 9 OUTDOOR ICE TRAIL / WALKING PATH 80,000 1.84 Seasonal refrigerated trail 10 TENNIS / PICKLE BALL 60,000 1.38 Replacement area to match existing 11 TENNIS / PICKLE BALL (50% EXPANSION)30,000 0.69 12 OUTDOOR AQUATICS PROGRAM 38,000 0.87 Splash pad, lazy river, two large water slides 13 PLAZA AREA - OUTDOOR GATHERING SPACE 3,000 0.07 14 PARKING LOT AREAS 100,000 2.30 300 CARS 15 TOTAL SITE AREA 2,180,236 50.05 PARCEL SIZE ESTIMATED 16 SITE AREA RATIO 30.15%69.85%Green space / 30% impervious PROGRAM SUMMARY 03.14.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 1 of 4 84 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.48May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.47 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 38 New Community Center - Building Program Key Components GYMNASIUM RECREATION FACILITY ADMIN COMMUNITY SPACE SENIOR PROGRAMS ICE ARENA YOUTH PROGRAMS GYMNASIUM AUXILIARY GYMNASIUM TRACK FITNESS CARDIO PLAY STUDIO STUDIO STOR. OFF. MULTI PURPOSE SENIOR CENTER WORKSHOP SMALL MEETING LARGE MEETING MEDIUM MEETING KITCHEN KITCHEN STOR.STOR. STOR. CAFE KITCHENETTE CHILD CAREOPEN OFFICES MNGR. OFFICE STAFF OFFICES STAFF OFFICES CONF.RECPT. NHL ICE SHEETBLEACHER / MEZZANINEZ.STOR. ICE MECH.PARTY TEAM LCKR. TEAM LCKR. TEAM LCKR. TEAM LCKR. LOUNGE 85 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.50May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.49 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 39 New Community Center - Building Program Key Components 70 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 113780 NSF 71 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.20 72 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 136536 GSF 73 AREA BY DEPARTMENT NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL 74 RECREATION 51980 45.68% 75 SUPPORT 1740 1.53% 76 CIRCULATION 1700 1.49% 77 COMMUNITY 14450 12.70% 78 ADMINISTRATION 1550 1.36% 79 CHILD CARE 1570 1.38% 80 SENIOR COMMISSION 6740 5.92% 81 ICE ARENA 34050 29.93% 82 TOTAL NET AREA 113780 100.00% 03.14.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 4 of 4 GYMNASIUM RECREATION FACILITY ADMIN COMMUNITY SPACE SENIOR PROGRAMS ICE ARENA YOUTH PROGRAMS 86 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.52May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.51 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 55 Community Center Summary and Budget Data: Option One: Remodel & Addition Project (at existing property) ROMProjectCost(2024) 1. Hard Costs Range $5.5M - $6.5M 2. Soft / Owner Costs Range $1.5M - $2.5M 3. Land Acquisition $0M 4. Total Costs Range $7M - $9M Escalation [2027 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 12% (0.12) 2. Total Costs Range $8M - $10M Escalation [2030 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 24% (0.24) 2. Total Costs Range $9M - $11M Option Two: New Building Project (at new property) ROMProjectCost(2024) 1. Hard Costs Range $42M - $89M 2. Soft / Owner Costs Range $13M - $16M 3. Land Acquisition $12M - $14M 4. Total Costs Range $67M - $119M Escalation [2027 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 12% (0.12) 2. Total Costs Range $75M - $133M Escalation [2030 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 24% (0.24) 2. Total Costs Range $83M - $147M 87 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.54May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.53 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 FIRE DEPARTMENT 88 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.56May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.55 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 41 OHW 877.0 OHW 699.2 OHW 896.3 OHW 865.3 OHW 944.5 OHW 956.1 OHW 881.8 OHW 955.5 OHW 993.6 OHW945.2 OHW 932.77 OHW 929.8 Lotus Lake Lake Riley Lake Minnewashta Lake Lucy Rice Lake Lake Susan Lake Ann Lake Virginia Lake Harrison Rice Marsh Lake Clasen Lake Lake St Joe Christmas Lake Lyman B l v d (CSAH18) Lyman Blvd (CSAH 18)Pion e e r Trail (C S AH 14) (C S A H 6 1 )F ly in g C lo u d D riv ePowersBlvd(C.R.17)AudubonRoad(CSAH15)State Hig h w a y 1 0 1Hwy101GreatPlainsBlvd Hwy 101Gr e at Pl ainsBlvdState Hwy 5 S ta te H w y 5 Arboretum Boulevard Highway 41GalpinBlvd.(C.R.117)State Hwy 5 S ta te H w y 7 Hazeltine Blvd (Hwy 41)Chanhassen Rd. Hwy. 101AudubonRoad(C S A H 6 1 )F ly in g C l o u d D rMinnewashtaPkwyGalpinBlvd(C.R.15)£¤212 £¤212 £¤212 PowersBlvd(C.R.17)Bluff Creek DrBluffCreekBlvd Ü Legend City Owned Property Greater than an Acre Date: 7/19/2018 K:\NickLH\Projects\PW\Engineering\ForVanessa\2018\July\City_Owned_Property.mxd City owned Property over an Acre 0 4,000 8,0002,000 Feet CITY HALL / FIRE #1 2013 FIRE STUDY PROPOSED STATION #3 LOCATION 2013 FIRE STUDY PROPOSED HEADQUARTERS FIRE #2 PUBLIC WORKS LOCATION 89 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.58May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.57 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 43 Goals: -Repurpose racquetball court -Provide Fire Admin Offices at station -Address accessiblity requirements -Provide additional storage CHANHASSEN FIRE STATION #1 LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes FIRE STATION 1 - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT A 11,600 0.27 2 GREEN SPACE B 18,000 0.41 Includes some sidewalk area (approximated) 3 WEST PARKING LOT C 9,640 0.22 6 CARS 4 EAST PARKING LOT (ACCESS APRON)G 14,500 0.33 12 CARS 5 SOUTH PARKING LOT H 5,230 0.12 13 CARS 6 TOTAL SITE AREA 58,970 1.35 PARCEL SIZE BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 7 SITE AREA RATIO 69.48%30.52%Green space / 69.48% impervious LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER Capacity Area / Person Notes FIRE STATION 1 - BUILDING DETAILED PROGRAM 7 LOWER LEVEL 8 STAIR #1 CIRCULATION 111 65 9 STAIR #2 CIRCULATION 214 100 10 OFFICE OPERATIONS 101 165 2 82.5 11 FILE STORAGE SUPPORT 102 200 12 JANITORS CLOSET #1 SUPPORT 103 70 13 RACQUETBALL SUPPORT 104 800 14 FITNESS SUPPORT 105 450 15 WOMENS LOCKER OPERATIONS 106 150 16 MENS LOCKER OPERATIONS 107 200 17 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 108 335 18 TRAINING OPERATIONS 109 1100 30 36.66667 19 MECHANICAL SUPPORT 110 175 20 BASEMENT FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 3810 PROGRAM SUMMARY 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 1 of 3 Fire #1 - Site Program Analysis Summary Data: -~1.35 Acres -~11,600 SF Building Footprint -31 Parking Stalls -31% Open Space, 69% Impervious Observations: -General maintenance -ADA compliance -Equipment upgrades -Site grading / drainage -Skylight repair -Functional updates -Cosmetic updates 90 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.60May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.59 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 44 CITY HALL OFFICES FIRE #1 1 FUTURE CITY HALL?2 3 Potential Remodel / Site Improvement Project Scope: Building Area 1. 11,700 SF Green Space 2. 18,000 SF Parking Area 3. West 6 stalls (9,640 SF) 4. East 12 stalls (14,500 SF) 5. South 13 stalls (5,230 SF) Site Area 6. 1.35 acres (58,970 SF) Site Area Ratio 7. +/-31% green space 8. +/-69% impervious Potential Improvements 1. Office Remodel 2. New Public Entrance 3. Storage / Training Addition 91 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.62May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.61 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 45 Main Level: +/- 10,500 gsf Lower Level: +/- 4,600 gsf Projected Growth: -Review location and response time implications -Additional office spaces -Storage + training program space -Full time staff increase -Review 2013 Fire Department Study and long term operational plans Space Utilization / Layout: UP UP TRAINING MECHANICAL CORRIDOR STAIR 2 OFFICE FILESTORAGE STAIR 1 MENS LOCKER WOMENS LOCKER RACQUET BALL FITNESS JANITOR /MECH FOYER 8'16'4'2'0' REF. REF. UP DN DN RACQUET BALL COURT BELOW APPARATUSSTORAGE LOUNGE KITCHEN CREW ROOM CREW ROOM COMMAND OFFICE DISPATCH CLOSET RESTROOMRESTROOM STORAGE CORRIDOR LOBBY CREW ROOM VESTIBULE STORAGE STAIR 2 STORAGE HOSE TOWER COMPRESSOR STAIR 1 AIR PACK STORAGE EMERGENCYGENERATOR APPARATUSSTORAGE STORAGE VESTIBULE 8'16'4'2'0' 92 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.64May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.63 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 46 Main Level: +/- 10,500 gsf Lower Level: +/- 4,600 gsf Potential Remodel Project: OfficeRemodel 1. Office (x3) = 130 SF 2. Chief Office = 200 SF 3. Elevator = 150 SF 4. Conference = 250 SF Training / Storage Addition 5. New Space = +/- 800-900 SF Revised Entrance 6. Public Entry »Reorganize towards City Hall 7. Reception Area UP UP ELEVATOR MECH STORAGE TRAINING MECHANICAL CORRIDOR STAIR 2 OFFICE FILESTORAGE STAIR 1 MENS LOCKER WOMENS LOCKER FITNESS JANITOR /MECH 8'16'4'2'0' REF. REF. UP DN DN 8'16'4'2'0' OFFICE CONFERENCE ELEVATOR OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE ENTRY STORAGE APPARATUS STORAGE LOUNGE KITCHEN CREW ROOM CREW ROOM COMMANDOFFICE DISPATCH CLOSET RESTROOMRESTROOM STORAGE CORRIDOR LOBBY CREW ROOM VESTIBULE STORAGE STAIR 2 STORAGE HOSE TOWER COMPRESSOR STAIR 1 AIR PACK STORAGE EMERGENCYGENERATOR APPARATUSSTORAGE STORAGE VESTIBULE Potential Project Scope EXISTING REMODEL NEW CONSTRUCTION 93 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.66May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.65 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 47 Potential Remodel / Site Improvement Project Scope: 40'80'20'10'0' Building Area 1. 11,700 SF Green Space 2. 18,000 SF Parking Area 3. West 6 stalls (9,640 SF) 4. East 12 stalls (14,500 SF) 5. South 13 stalls (5,230 SF) Site Area 6. 1.35 acres (58,970 SF) Site Area Ratio 7. +/-31% green space 8. +/-69% impervious Potential Improvements 1. Office Remodel 2. New Public Entrance 3. Storage / Training Addition 1 2 3 94 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.68May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.67 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 49 Goals: -Update functional limitations -Address accessiblity requirements -Update finishes and interior to modern standards -Prepare facility for alternate use Fire #2 - Program Analysis Summary Data: -~1 Acres -~3,000 SF Building Footprint -12 Parking Stalls -29% Open Space, 71% Impervious Observations: -General maintenance -ADA compliance -Hose tower safety concerns -Equipment upgrades -Functional updates -Cosmetic updates CHANHASSEN FIRE STATION #2 LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes FIRE STATION 2 - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT A 3,000 0.07 2 GREEN SPACE B 32,375 0.74 3 PUBLIC SIDEWALK C 1,310 0.03 4 SOUTH PARKING LOT (ACCESS APRON)G 3,385 0.08 3 CARS 5 SOUTHWEST PARKING LOT H 5,230 0.12 9 CARS 6 TOTAL SITE AREA 45,300 1.04 PARCEL SIZE BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 7 SITE AREA RATIO 28.53%71.47%Green space / 28.53% impervious LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER Capacity Area / Person Notes FIRE STATION 2 - BUILDING DETAILED PROGRAM LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER AREA (SF)Capacity Area / Person Notes 8 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL 9 APPARATUS BAY OPERATIONS A100 1800 N/A Functional updates recommended 10 LAUNDRY / TOOL OPERATIONS A101 130 2 65 Remodeling project recommended 11 HOSE TOWER OPERATIONS A102 90 N/A Demolition and conversion to storage space recommended 12 OFFICE OPERATIONS A103 130 2 65 Remodeling project recommended 13 WOMEN SUPPORT A104 75 1 75 ADA compliance - remodeling recommended 14 MEN SUPPORT A105 75 1 75 ADA compliance - remodeling recommended 15 JANITOR CLOSET SUPPORT A106 5 N/A Remodeling project recommended 16 LOUNGE FIRE STAFF / PRIVATE A107 500 10 50 Remodeling project recommended 17 MECHANICAL BUILDING SERVICES A108 100 1 100 See facility assessment for deferred maintenance recommended 18 HALLWAY SUPPORT A109 75 Remodeling project recommended 19 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 2980 20 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 2980 NSF 21 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.06 22 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 3150 GSF PROGRAM SUMMARY 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 1 of 2 95 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.70May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.69 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 50 40'80'20'10'0' Building Area 1. 3,000 SF Green Space 2. 32,375 SF Sidewalk 3. 1,310 SF Parking Area 4. West 9 stalls (5,230 SF) 5. South 3 stalls (3,385 SF) Site Area 6. 1.04 acres (45,300 SF) Site Area Ratio 7. +/-71% green space 8. +/-29% impervious Minnewas ht a P a r k w a y High w a y 7 Site Overview: 1 54 2 3 96 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.72May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.71 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 51 Projected Growth: -Review 2013 Fire Department Study and long term operational plans -No growth anticipated at this station Space Utilization / Layout: KITCHENETTE FURNACE 5'-9"6'-9"KITCHENETTE LOUNGE MEN APPARATUS BAY LAUNDRY / TOOLSTORAGE OFFICE WOMEN MECHANICAL HALLWAY 4'8'2'1'0' J.C. 97 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.74May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.73 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 52 Potential Remodel Project: Light Remodel 1. Laundry / Tool = 130 SF »Finish updates »New equipment 2. Apparatus Bay = 1,800 SF »Finish updates »New epoxy flooring 3. Hallway = 75 SF »Finish updates Medium Remodel 4. Mechanical = 100 SF »Deferred Maintenance Updates Heavy Remodel 5. Storage = 90 SF »Finish updates »New walls and doors »Demo hose tower and repair roofing 6. Lounge = 500 SF & Office = 130 SF »Finish updates »New casework »New furniture 7. Restrooms = 150 SF »Finish updates »New fixtures »New furniture KITCHENETTE FURNACE LOUNGE MEN APPARATUS BAY LAUNDRY / TOOLSTORAGE OFFICE WOMEN MECHANICAL J.C. HALLWAY 6'-9"7'-0"5'-0" 4'8'2'1'0' Remodel Intensity LIGHT MEDIUM HEAVY KITCHENETTE FURNACE LOUNGE MEN APPARATUS BAY LAUNDRY / TOOLSTORAGE OFFICE WOMEN MECHANICAL J.C. HALLWAY 6'-9"7'-0"5'-0" 4'8'2'1'0' Remodel Intensity LIGHT MEDIUM HEAVY 98 3.0 MASTER PLAN CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3.76May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.75 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 56 Fire #1 Summary and Budget Data: Option One: Remodel & Addition Project (at existing property) ROMProjectCost(2024) 1. Hard Costs Range $3M - $3.5M 2. Soft / Owner Costs Range $1M - $1.5M 3. Land Acquisition $0 4. Total Costs Range $4M - $5M Escalation [2027 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 12% (0.12) 2. Total Costs Range $4.5M - $5.6M Escalation [2030 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 24% (0.24) 2. Total Costs Range $5M - $6.2M Option Two: New Building Project (on City Owned Land) ROMProjectCost(2024) 1. Hard Costs Range $7M - $8M 2. Soft / Owner Costs Range $1.5M - $2.5M 3. Land Acquisition $0 4. Total Costs Range $8.5M - $10.5M Escalation [2027 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 12% (0.12) 2. Total Costs Range $9.5M - $12M Escalation [2030 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 24% (0.24) 2. Total Costs Range $10.5M - $13M 99 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 78May 23rd, 2022 3.0 MASTER PLAN 3.77 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY03.21.2022 57 Fire #2 Summary and Budget Data: Option One: Remodel Project (at existing property) ROMProjectCost(2024) 1. Hard Costs Range $350,000 - $400,000 2. Soft / Owner Costs Range $100,000 - 150,000 3. Land Acquisition $0M 4. Total Costs Range $450,000 - $550,000 Escalation [2027 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 12% (0.12) 2. Total Costs Range $500,000 - $615,000 Escalation [2030 project cost] 1. Percentage Increase 24% (0.24) 2. Total Costs Range $560,000 - $685,000 Option Two: Divest (no action) ROMProjectCost(2024) 1. Total Costs Range $0M 100 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 2May 23rd, 2022 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS 1 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 1May 23rd, 2022 A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT The phase one facilities assessment process was completed in December 2021 and presented to the City Council at the January 10th, 2022 Council work session. The following key points were identified as the critical take aways based on the data analysis and collaborative work with the facilities committee. • Completed a Facility Condition Assessments of 5 Facilities for the City of Chanhassen in Fall of 2021 »City Hall: Is in good shape structurally. Poor circulation routes throughout the building and privacy is an issue with noise traveling very easily. Ventilation issues, very humid during the day. Interior is outdated and would need many cosmetic updates »Rec Center: Does not fit the geographic location that residents are looking for. Building is in good shape but is outdated inside. The big issue is with drainage at this location. Not enough parking. Repair the warming house. »Fire station 1: Money has recently been put into this building with the roof replacement. Building overall is in good shape. Update the interior to better hold events/activities. » Fire Station 2: Poor access and not suitable to hold any events or activities. Interior is outdated. Space could be turned into something new that is better suited for this space. Update to polished concrete or epoxy flooring in fire hall. »Old Village Hall: Overall is in good shape. Very small and will not require a lot of money to keep up. Replace the missing/cracked bricks on the sidewalk surrounding the building. B. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MASTER PLAN The phase two master plan process was completed in March 2022 and presented to the City Council at the March 21st, 2022 Council work session. The following key points were discussed during the meeting to inform the City Council and assist with future decision making. The master plan process did not result in a recommended path forward but rather provided information to allow for the pros and cons of alternatives to be better understood and allow the City to develop a long-term strategic plan for their facilities. Scan the QR Code to View the City of Chanhassen Facility Condition Study The Snow Kreilich and Kraus-Anderson team attended a follow up City Council work session on Aril 11th, 2022 to support additional discussion and next steps forward in response to the master plan. The Council work session discussions focused on the following key questions to help inform next steps: • Evaluate current and potential alternate locations for Facilities »Where desired / applicable • Explore options to accommodate future needs and changing demographics »Evaluate pros / cons of re-using existing facility structures, remodeling or adding new building additions »Evaluate pros / cons of building new replacement facilities • Identify City goals for sustainability and operational efficiency »Evaluate pros / cons to identify strategies that can align with City mission, goals, and long term plans • Generate cost estimates for alternatives that can be compared with Facility Assessment cost data to inform City long term financial planning and investments Review and confirm the proposed project scope(s) aligns with the City’s goals and priorities • City Hall »Retrofit vs. Build New? The Council expressed an preference to further explore building new in lieu of a large scale remodeling and addition project at the existing building during the April 11th work session. • Recreation Center » A Referendum Task Force has been created to clarify and review the scope and potential options for the Parks & Recreation referendum and potential for a new community center. • Fire Stations » Next steps are to Be Determined: Pending decisions for other facilities. CITY OF NEW PRAGUE FACILITIES NEEDS STUDY | 5SNOW KREILICH ARCHITECTS PROJECT INFORMATION Client; City of Chanhassen Location: Chanhassen, MN Size: Study Cost: Undisclosed Completion Date: March, 2022 REFERENCE Charlie Howley, PE, LEED AP Public Works Director, City Engineer City of Chanhassen chowley@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 952-227-1169 The City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study included a thorough review of five existing buildings: City Hall, the Recreation Center, Fire Station #1, Fire Station #2, and Old Village Hall. The objective of the Study was to complete Facility Condition Assessments (FCA) and a Master Planning Study on each facility. The FCA gave an overview of current operating costs, potential major replacements, deficiencies, and remaining useful life of equipment and building materials. At the conclusion, the buildings were measured on an industry accepted metric known as the “Facility Condition Index,” which identified next steps to invest, refurbish, rebuild, and/or divest. The Master Planning Study focused on the use of space and potential for expansion or new facilities. Feasibility options were included for cost, efficient use of space/access, sustainability, adherence to strategic priorities, levels of service to the public, land availability, partnerships with stakeholders, and safety/security/code compliance/ employee wellness. The Study resulted in an estimated 10-year plan for all five properties, including conceptual designs for both refurbished and new building options for the City Hall, Fire Station 1, and Recreation Center. The plans for the City Hall and Recreation Center were thoroughly detailed and provided estimates for each option allowing the City Council to make an informed decision on the best use of public dollars for their next steps. The study process and deliverables focused on developing a better understanding of the existing facility conditions and needs, potential strategies to accommodate growth and changing demographics, and thoughtful, informed long-term planning in these buildings. City of Chanhassen Facilities Study 3] PROJECT EXPERIENCE SNOWKREILICH ARCHITECTS IN COLLABORATION WITH Scan the QR Code to View the City of Chanhassen Facility Condition Study 101 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 4May 23rd, 2022 May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 52 Summary Comparison of Five (5) Facilities: ■Priorities (In present day dollars) $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000 City Hall Rec Center Fire Station 1 Fire Station 2 Old Village Hall City of Chanhassen (Present Day Dollars) Priority 1's Priority 2's Priority 3's Priority 1's Priority 2's Priority 3's Total City Hall 4,003,640$ 565,625$ 113,943$ 4,683,208$ Rec Center 1,855,585$ 209,819$ 9,444$ 2,074,848$ Fire Station 1 836,594$ 193,000$ 18,750$ 1,048,344$ Fire Station 2 289,375$ 7,500$ -$ 296,875$ Old Village Hall 69,125$ -$ -$ 69,125$ Subtotal 6,695,819$ 968,444$ 142,136$ 7,806,399$ 102 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 6May 23rd, 2022 May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 53 Summary Comparison of Five (5) Facilities: Priority #1s Only (0 to 5 years)FCI SF Replacement Estimate Deferred Maintenance Def Maint/ Replacement Costs $/SF City Hall 4,003,640$ 0.3620 31,600 350.00$ Rec Center 1,855,585$ 0.2249 30,000 275.00$ Fire Station 1 836,594$ 0.0882 31,600 300.00$ Fire Station 2 289,375$ 0.3014 3,200 300.00$ Old Village Hall 69,125$ 0.1728 800 500.00$ Subtotal 6,695,819$ 0.2082 93,200 345.00$ Priority #2s (6 to 8 years)FCI- Cumulative SF Replacement Estimate Deferred Maintenance Def Maint/ Replacement Costs $/SF City Hall 565,625$ 0.4131 31,600 350.00$ Rec Center 209,819$ 0.2504 30,000 275.00$ Fire Station 1 193,000$ 0.1086 31,600 300.00$ Fire Station 2 7,500$ 0.3092 3,200 300.00$ Old Village Hall -$ 0.1728 800 500.00$ Subtotal 968,444$ 0.2384 93,200 345.00$ Priority #3s (9-10 years)FCI- Cumulative SF Replacement Estimate Deferred Maintenance Def Maint/ Replacement Costs $/SF City Hall 113,943$ 0.4234 31,600 350.00$ Rec Center 9,444$ 0.2515 30,000 275.00$ Fire Station 1 18,750$ 0.1106 31,600 300.00$ Fire Station 2 -$ 0.3092 3,200 300.00$ Old Village Hall -$ 0.1728 800 500.00$ Subtotal 142,136$ 0.2428 93,200 345.00$ FCI =Deferred Maintenance Deficiences Building Replacement Costs 15,100 15,100 15,100 103 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 8May 23rd, 2022 May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 54 Summary Comparison of Five (5) Facilities: $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 Total Year 2023 Year 2024 Year 2025 Year 2026 Year 2027 Year 2028 Year 2029 Year 2030 Year 2031 Year 2032 104 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS 4.0 CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 9 CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 10May 23rd, 2022 May 23rd, 2022CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY01.10.2022 53 Summary Comparison of Five (5) Facilities: Priority #1s Only (0 to 5 years)FCI SF Replacement Estimate Deferred Maintenance Def Maint/ Replacement Costs $/SF City Hall 4,003,640$ 0.3620 31,600 350.00$ Rec Center 1,855,585$ 0.2249 30,000 275.00$ Fire Station 1 836,594$ 0.0882 31,600 300.00$ Fire Station 2 289,375$ 0.3014 3,200 300.00$ Old Village Hall 69,125$ 0.1728 800 500.00$ Subtotal 6,695,819$ 0.2082 93,200 345.00$ Priority #2s (6 to 8 years)FCI- Cumulative SF Replacement Estimate Deferred Maintenance Def Maint/ Replacement Costs $/SF City Hall 565,625$ 0.4131 31,600 350.00$ Rec Center 209,819$ 0.2504 30,000 275.00$ Fire Station 1 193,000$ 0.1086 31,600 300.00$ Fire Station 2 7,500$ 0.3092 3,200 300.00$ Old Village Hall -$ 0.1728 800 500.00$ Subtotal 968,444$ 0.2384 93,200 345.00$ Priority #3s (9-10 years)FCI- Cumulative SF Replacement Estimate Deferred Maintenance Def Maint/ Replacement Costs $/SF City Hall 113,943$ 0.4234 31,600 350.00$ Rec Center 9,444$ 0.2515 30,000 275.00$ Fire Station 1 18,750$ 0.1106 31,600 300.00$ Fire Station 2 -$ 0.3092 3,200 300.00$ Old Village Hall -$ 0.1728 800 500.00$ Subtotal 142,136$ 0.2428 93,200 345.00$ FCI =Deferred Maintenance Deficiences Building Replacement Costs 15,100 15,100 15,100 105 5.0 APPENDIX CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 5.2May 23rd, 2022 5.0 APPENDIX 5.1 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 5.0 APPENDIX A. PROJECT SCHEDULE INVENTORY AND ASSESS NEEDS TASKS 1.0 KICK-OFF MEETING 1.1 RECEIVE CITY PROVIDED DRAWINGS / DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW 1.2 LEARNING SITE TOURS 1.3 USER ENGAGEMENT SURVEY PROCESS 1.4 DETAILED REVIEW OF ASSESSMENT DATA 1.5 MEET WITH CITY STAFF USER GROUPS 1.6 REVIEW SURVEY DATA 1.7 CREATE PROJECT SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM DOCUMENTS 1.8 PREPARE FOR CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1.9 REVIEW PROGRESS AT CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AUGUST - DECEMBER 2021 JANUARY - MARCH 2022 PHASE ONE - INVENTORY AND ASSESS NEEDS PHASE TWO - SYNTHESIS AND CONCEPT MARCHFEBRUARY 2022JANUARY 2022AUGUST - SEPTEMBER OCTOBER - NOVEMBER DECEMBER PROCESS MILESTONES 1.0 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.71.6 1.8 1.9 SYNTHESIS AND CONCEPT TASKS 2.0 PRESENTATION OF PHASE ONE FINDINGS TO PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE (#2) 2.1 REVIEW AND CONFIRM GOALS 2.2 CONCEPT SITE PLAN STUDIES 2.3 CONCEPT INTERIOR LAYOUT / BUILDING STUDIES BASED ON PROGRAM AND USER FEEDBACK 2.4 USER EXPERIENCE STUDIES 2.5 ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE (ROM) CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATING 2.6 TEST CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO CONFIRM ALIGNMENT WITH GOALS 2.7 CONFIRM ROM PRICING 2.8 MEET WITH PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE (#3) 2.9 SUMMARY OF RESULTS : MARCH 21, 2022 106 5.0 APPENDIX CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 5.4May 23rd, 2022 5.0 APPENDIX 5.3 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 B. DETAILED SITE & BUILDING SPACE USE PROGRAM DOCUMENTS FOR EACH FACILITY 1. City Hall: Space Analysis CHANHASSEN CITY HALL CAMPUS LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes CITY HALL CAMPUS - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT A 16,800 0.39 2 GREEN SPACE B 110,500 2.54 Includes some drive lane area (approximated) 3 PARK / OUTDOOR PLAZA C 51,200 1.18 4 SKATE PARK D 26,000 0.60 5 OUTDOOR RINK E 20,000 0.46 6 EAST PARKING LOT (Lower Level)F 20,500 0.47 52 CARS 7 EAST PARKING LOT (Upper Level)G 8,500 0.20 24 CARS 8 WEST PARKING LOT (Upper Level)H 37,300 0.86 93 CARS 9 WEST PARKING LOT (Lower Level)H 37,300 0.86 26 CARS Library covered parking 10 TOTAL SITE AREA 328,100 7.53 195 PARCEL SIZE BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 11 SITE AREA RATIO 66.32%33.68%Green space / 67.00% impervious LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER AREA (SF)Capacity Area / Person Notes CITY HALL CAMPUS - BUILDING DETAILED PROGRAM 12 LOWER LEVEL 13 ELEVATOR CIRCULATION 105 14 STAIR #1 CIRCULATION 115 15 STAIR #2 CIRCULATION 107 16 STAIR #3 CIRCULATION 115 16 RESTROOMS #1 SUPPORT 232 17 RESTROOMS #2 SUPPORT 272 18 RESTROOMS #3 SUPPORT 91 19 JANITORS CLOSET #1 SUPPORT 58 20 JANITORS CLOSET #2 SUPPORT 35 21 MECHANICAL #1 SUPPORT 205 22 ELECTRICAL / IT #1 SUPPORT / IT 268 23 MECHANICAL #2 SUPPORT 100 24 ELECTRICAL #2 SUPPORT 70 25 ELECTRICAL #3 SUPPORT 150 26 MAIN BUILDING STORAGE SUPPORT 2175 27 STORAGE SUPPORT 320 28 FACILITIES OFFICE CITY ADMINISTRATION 240 1 240 29 COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY ADMINISTRATION 1275 30 STAFF BREAK ROOM AREA SUPPORT 150 31 SENIOR CENTER SENIOR COMMISSION 1550 50 31 32 SENIOR CENTER OFFICE SENIOR COMMISSION 95 1 95 33 SENIOR CENTER KITCHENETTE SENIOR COMMISSION 145 2 72.5 34 FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPORT 870 35 MAPLE ROOM SENIOR COMMISSION 900 20 45 36 MAPLE ROOM OFFICE SENIOR COMMISSION 85 1 85 37 MAPLE ROOM CLOSET SENIOR COMMISSION 15 38 MAPLE ROOM KITCHENETTE SENIOR COMMISSION 85 2 42.5 39 KITCHEN SENIOR COMMISSION 515 40 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 145 41 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 145 42 HALLWAY CIRCULATION 630 43 HALLWAY CIRCULATION 900 44 IT HALLWAY CIRCULATION 109 45 HALLWAY CIRCULATION 513 46 BASEMENT FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 12785 47 LOWER LEVEL GROSS SQUARE FEET 15375 GSF PROGRAM SUMMARY 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study 1 of 4 LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER AREA (SF)Capacity Area / Person Notes 48 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL 49 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 100 50 MAIN LOBBY CIRCULATION 300 51 RECEPTION CITY ADMINISTRATION 150 2 75 52 MEN SUPPORT 75 53 WOMEN SUPPORT 95 54 STAIR CIRCULATION 256 100 55 OFFICE PARKS & REC 250 115 1 115 56 OPEN OFFICE PARKS & REC 251 113 2 56.5 57 OPEN OFFICE PARKS & REC 252 252 3 84 58 STORAGE PARKS & REC 253 65 59 OFFICE PARKS & REC 254 113 1 113 60 OFFICE CITY ADMINISTRATION 248 145 1 145 61 OFFICE CITY ADMINISTRATION 249 119 1 119 62 STORAGE / IT CITY ADMINISTRATION 261 150 63 OFFICE CITY ADMINISTRATION 115 1 115 64 COPY / FILE ROOM CITY ADMINISTRATION 260 150 65 OPEN OFFICE CITY ADMINISTRATION 259 360 4 90 66 OFFICE CITY ADMINISTRATION 257 175 2 87.5 67 IT MANAGER OFFICE SUPPORT / IT 258 177 1 177 68 IT OFFICE SUPPORT / IT 246 110 1 110 69 TOILET SUPPORT 265 23 70 TOILET SUPPORT 266 23 71 FILE STORAGE SUPPORT 239 95 72 CONFERENCE ROOM PLANNING 241 175 6 29.16667 73 OFFICE PLANNING 242 95 1 95 74 OFFICE PLANNING 243 95 1 95 75 OFFICE PLANNING 244 95 1 95 76 OFFICE PLANNING 245 175 1 175 77 OFFICE PLANNING 247 130 1 130 78 STORAGE CLOSET FINANCE 237 36 79 OPEN OFFICE FINANCE 238 500 3 166.6667 80 OFFICE FINANCE 240 175 1 175 81 OFFICE ENGINEERING 220 112 1 112 82 OFFICE ENGINEERING 223 95 1 95 83 OFFICE ENGINEERING 224 126 1 126 84 OFFICE ENGINEERING 225 131 1 131 85 COPY ROOM ENGINEERING 228 104 86 OFFICE ENGINEERING 230 117 1 117 87 OFFICE ENGINEERING 231 121 1 121 88 OPEN OFFICE ENGINEERING 232 54 1 54 89 OPEN OFFICE ENGINEERING 211 2 105.5 90 KITCHEN / OPEN OFFICE ENGINEERING 229 152 2 76 91 OFFICE / FILE STORAGE ENGINEERING 234 195 1 195 92 OFFICE ENGINEERING 235 175 1 175 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study 2 of 4 93 STAIR C SUPPORT 136 140 94 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 200 245 95 ELEVATOR CIRCULATION 50 96 STAIR B CIRCULATION 201 130 97 BUILDING / PUBLIC SAFETY LOBBY SUPPORT 202 310 98 OFFICE SHERIFF 217 182 1 182 99 INTERVIEW SHERIFF 216 116 3 38.66667 100 OFFICE SHERIFF 222 288 4 72 101 OFFICE SHERIFF 221 184 3 61.33333 102 EVIDENCE ROOM SHERIFF 204 133 103 COPY ROOM BUILDING 203 246 3 82 104 SERVICE COUNTER / STORAGE BUILDING 232 105 STORAGE BUILDING 212 116 106 BUILDING DEPARTMENT OPEN OFFICE BUILDING 213 1168 6 194.6667 107 COPY ROOM BUILDING 215 111 108 PLAN ROOM BUILDING 219 142 109 OFFICE FIRE DEPARTMENT 205 135 1 135 110 OFFICE FIRE DEPARTMENT 206 190 2 95 111 OFFICE FIRE DEPARTMENT 209 223 2 111.5 112 TOILET SUPPORT 210 50 113 TOILET SUPPORT 211 50 114 KITCHENNETTE SUPPORT 40 115 CLOSET SUPPORT 208A 12 116 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 207 33 117 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 208 330 118 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 214 365 119 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 229 260 120 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 233 55 121 CORRIDOR / ENG. / FIN. LOBBY CIRCULATION 236 245 122 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 262 175 123 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 263 160 124 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 264 140 125 COURTYARD CIRCULATION 1330 126 COURTYARD CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPORT 330 8 41.25 127 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 14105 128 MAIN LEVEL GROSS SQUARE FEET 16560 GSF 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study 3 of 4 City Hall (Continued) 107 5.0 APPENDIX CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 5.6May 23rd, 2022 5.0 APPENDIX 5.5 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 129 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 26890 NSF 130 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.19 131 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 31935 GSF 132 AREA BY DEPARTMENT # OF STAFF NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL 133 SUPPORT 5971 22.21% 134 CIRCULATION 6902 25.67% 135 CITY ADMINISTRATION 12 2879 10.71% 136 SUPPORT / IT 3 555 2.06% 137 PARKS & REC 6 658 2.45% 138 PLANNING 5 765 2.84% 139 FINANCE 4 711 2.64% 140 ENGINEERING 13 1593 5.92% 141 SHERIFF 8 903 3.36% 142 BUILDING 9 2015 7.49% 143 FIRE DEPARTMENT 5 548 2.04% 144 SENIOR COMMISSION 3 3390 12.61% 145 TOTAL FTE 68 26890 100.00% 146 POTENTIAL NEW PROGRAM AREAS QTY TOTAL NSF 147 ADMINISTRATION OFFICES CITY ADMINISTRATION 2 130 260 148 IT OFFICES SUPPORT / IT 2 130 260 149 FINANCE OFFICES FINANCE 2 130 260 150 BUILDING OFFICES BUILDING 1 130 130 151 PLANNING OFFICES PLANNING 1 130 65 152 PARKS & RECREATION PARKS & REC 2 130 260 153 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 2 130 260 154 FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT 2 130 260 155 SENIOR SENIOR COMMISSION 1 130 130 156 SHERIFF SHERIFF 4 130 520 157 CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPORT 800 158 EXPANDED COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY ADMINISTRATION 800 159 RESTROOMS SUPPORT 1000 160 STORAGE SUPPORT 1200 161 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 6205 NSF 162 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.30 163 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 8067 GSF 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study 4 of 4 CHANHASSEN COMMUNITY CENTER (FUTURE) LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes CHANHASSEN COMMUNITY CENTER - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT 127,936 2.94 2 WARMING HOUSE 2,000 0.05 3 GREEN SPACE / STORMWATER POND 700,000 16.07 4 TURF SOCCER / FOOTBALL FIELD 86,400 1.98 5 MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS 633,000 14.53 Replacement area to match existing 6 MULTI-PURPOSE FIELDS (30% EXPANSION)189,900 4.36 7 OUTDOOR SKATE PARK 30,000 0.69 1 refrigerated outdoor sheet, 1 seasonal sheet 8 OUTDOOR RINKS 55,000 1.26 1 refrigerated outdoor sheet, 1 seasonal sheet 9 OUTDOOR ICE TRAIL / WALKING PATH 80,000 1.84 Seasonal refrigerated trail 10 TENNIS / PICKLE BALL 60,000 1.38 Replacement area to match existing 11 TENNIS / PICKLE BALL (50% EXPANSION)30,000 0.69 12 OUTDOOR AQUATICS PROGRAM 38,000 0.87 Splash pad, lazy river, two large water slides 13 PLAZA AREA - OUTDOOR GATHERING SPACE 3,000 0.07 14 PARKING LOT AREAS 100,000 2.30 300 CARS 15 TOTAL SITE AREA 2,135,236 49.02 PARCEL SIZE ESTIMATED 16 SITE AREA RATIO 28.68%71.32%Green space / 30% impervious PROGRAM SUMMARY 03.14.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 1 of 4 LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER Capacity Area / Person Notes CHANHASSEN COMMUNITY CENTER - BUILDING CONCEPT PROGRAM LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT QTY AREA (ASF) AREA (NSF) Capacity Area / Person Notes 17 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL 18 3 COURT COMMUNITY GYMNASIUM RECREATION 3 7500 22500 Bleacher seating for competition court 19 AUXILIARY GYM / STORM SHELTER RECREATION 1 7000 7000 20 GYM STORAGE RECREATION 3 600 1800 21 WALKING TRACK (ELEVATED)RECREATION 1 5400 5400 22 LOCKER SPACES SUPPORT 2 800 1600 23 FITNESS CARDIO RECREATION 1 8000 8000 Cardio, strength training, flex training, fitness desk 24 FITNESS TRAINER OFFICE RECREATION 1 180 180 2 90 2 Work Stations 25 FITNESS STUDIO #1 RECREATION 1 2000 2000 40 50 26 FITNESS STUDIO #2 RECREATION 1 1500 1500 30 50 27 FITNESS STORAGE RECREATION 3 200 600 28 FITNESS TOILET SUPPORT 2 70 140 29 INDOOR PLAY AREA RECREATION 1 3000 3000 Youth play area 30 MULTI-PURPOSE EVENT SPACE COMMUNITY 1 4200 4200 Flexible tables and chairs / moveable partitions 31 CHAIR STORAGE COMMUNITY 1 600 600 32 A/V ROOM COMMUNITY 1 150 150 33 CATERING KITCHEN COMMUNITY 1 800 800 34 SMALL MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS COMMUNITY 3 500 1500 35 MEDIUM MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS COMMUNITY 2 900 1800 36 LARGE MULTI-PURPOSE MEETING ROOMS COMMUNITY 2 2400 4800 37 STORAGE COMMUNITY 2 300 600 38 SENIOR CENTER SENIOR COMMISSION 1 2000 2000 39 OFFICE SENIOR COMMISSION 2 120 240 40 OFFICE SENIOR COMMISSION 2 100 200 41 KITCHEN SENIOR COMMISSION 1 600 600 42 KITCHENETTE SENIOR COMMISSION 2 150 300 43 LOUNGE SENIOR COMMISSION 1 1200 1200 44 STORAGE SENIOR COMMISSION 1 600 600 45 WORKSHOP SENIOR COMMISSION 2 800 1600 46 DAYCARE / CHILD AREA CHILD CARE 1 1200 1200 47 DROP-OFF CUBBIES CHILD CARE 1 100 100 48 OFFICE CHILD CARE 1 100 100 49 STORAGE CHILD CARE 1 100 100 50 CHILDREN'S TOILET CHILD CARE 1 70 70 51 ICE ARENA ICE ARENA 1 22000 22000 NHL Sheet of Ice (200' x 85') 52 LOCKER ROOMS ICE ARENA 4 800 3200 53 ZAMBONI ICE ARENA 1 1200 1200 03.14.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 2 of 4 54 TOILET ICE ARENA 2 800 1600 55 PARTY ROOM ICE ARENA 1 850 850 56 STORAGE ICE ARENA 1 1000 1000 57 ICE MECHANICAL ICE ARENA 1 1000 1000 58 SPECTATOR MEZZANINE ICE ARENA 1 3200 3200 BLEACHER SEATING / MEZZANINE VIEWING 59 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 1 400 400 60 ENTRANCE LOBBY CIRCULATION 1 1000 1000 61 PARKS & RECREATION RECEPTION DESK ADMINISTRATION 1 300 300 3 100 62 FACILITY MANAGER ADMINISTRATION 1 150 150 1 150 63 STAFF OFFICES ADMINISTRATION 3 120 360 1 120 64 OPEN OFFICES ADMINISTRATION 4 80 320 4 80 Open work stations 65 ADMINISTRATION STORAGE ADMINISTRATION 1 120 120 66 ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCE SPACE ADMINISTRATION 1 300 300 67 VENDING AREA CIRCULATION 1 100 100 68 ELEVATOR CIRCULATION 1 200 200 Shaft area + equipment room 69 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 113780 03.14.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 3 of 4 City Hall (Continued)2. Recreation Center: Space Analysis 108 5.0 APPENDIX CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 5.8May 23rd, 2022 5.0 APPENDIX 5.7 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 70 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 113780 NSF 71 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.20 72 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 136536 GSF 73 AREA BY DEPARTMENT NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL 74 RECREATION 51980 45.68% 75 SUPPORT 1740 1.53% 76 CIRCULATION 1700 1.49% 77 COMMUNITY 14450 12.70% 78 ADMINISTRATION 1550 1.36% 79 CHILD CARE 1570 1.38% 80 SENIOR COMMISSION 6740 5.92% 81 ICE ARENA 34050 29.93% 82 TOTAL NET AREA 113780 100.00% 03.14.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 4 of 4 Recreation Center (Continued)3. Fire Station #1: Space Analysis CHANHASSEN FIRE STATION #1 LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes FIRE STATION 1 - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT A 11,600 0.27 2 GREEN SPACE B 18,000 0.41 Includes some sidewalk area (approximated) 3 WEST PARKING LOT C 9,640 0.22 6 CARS 4 EAST PARKING LOT (ACCESS APRON)G 14,500 0.33 12 CARS 5 SOUTH PARKING LOT H 5,230 0.12 13 CARS 6 TOTAL SITE AREA 58,970 1.35 PARCEL SIZE BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 7 SITE AREA RATIO 69.48%30.52%Green space / 69.48% impervious LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER Capacity Area / Person Notes FIRE STATION 1 - BUILDING DETAILED PROGRAM 7 LOWER LEVEL 8 STAIR #1 CIRCULATION 111 65 9 STAIR #2 CIRCULATION 214 100 10 OFFICE OPERATIONS 101 165 2 82.5 11 FILE STORAGE SUPPORT 102 200 12 JANITORS CLOSET #1 SUPPORT 103 70 13 RACQUETBALL SUPPORT 104 800 14 FITNESS SUPPORT 105 450 15 WOMENS LOCKER OPERATIONS 106 150 16 MENS LOCKER OPERATIONS 107 200 17 CORRIDOR CIRCULATION 108 335 18 TRAINING OPERATIONS 109 1100 30 36.66667 19 MECHANICAL SUPPORT 110 175 20 BASEMENT FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 3810 PROGRAM SUMMARY 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 1 of 3 LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER AREA (SF)Capacity Area / Person Notes 21 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL 22 VESTIBULE CIRCULATION 201 150 23 LOBBY CIRCULATION 202 110 24 COMMAND OFFICE OPERATIONS 203 210 3 70 25 DISPATCH OPERATIONS 204 160 3 53.33333 26 CREW ROOM OPERATIONS 205 200 1 200 27 CREW ROOM OPERATIONS 206 140 1 140 28 CREW ROOM OPERATIONS 207 130 1 130 29 CLOSET SUPPORT 208 30 30 RESTROOM SUPPORT 209 45 31 RESTROOM SUPPORT 210 55 32 STORAGE SUPPORT 211 30 33 KITCHEN SUPPORT 212 215 4 53.75 34 LOUNGE OPERATIONS 213 875 20 43.75 35 STAIR CIRCULATION 214 AREA IN LOWER LEVEL 36 COMPRESSOR / LAUNDRY SUPPORT 215 110 37 HOSE TOWER SUPPORT 216 90 38 AIR PACK OPERATIONS 217 90 39 TOOL / STORAGE SUPPORT 218 185 40 EMERGENCY GENERATOR SUPPORT 219 225 41 APPARATUS OPERATIONS 220 2800 42 APPARATUS OPERATIONS 221 3000 43 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 8850 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 2 of 3 44 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 12660 NSF 45 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.19 46 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 15100 GSF 47 AREA BY DEPARTMENT # OF STAFF NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL 48 OPERATIONS 9220 72.83% 49 SUPPORT 2680 21.17% 50 CIRCULATION 760 6.00% 51 TOTAL FTE 0 12660 100.00% 0 52 POTENTIAL NEW PROGRAM AREAS QTY 53 ELEVATOR CIRCULATION 1 150 Provide ADA access to lower level. 54 FIRE CHIEF OFFICE OPERATIONS 1 200 Move from City Hall 55 OFFICE OPERATIONS 3 150 Move from City Hall 56 CONFERENCE ROOM ADMINISTRATION 1 350 57 RECEPTION WAITING AREA ADMINISTRATION 1 150 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 3 of 3 109 5.0 APPENDIX CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 5.10May 23rd, 2022 5.0 APPENDIX 5.9 ӏ CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY May 23rd, 2022 4. Fire Station #2: Space Analysis CHANHASSEN FIRE STATION #2 LINE SITE PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT AREA (SF) AREA (ACRES) Capacity Notes FIRE STATION 2 - GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT A 3,000 0.07 2 GREEN SPACE B 32,375 0.74 3 PUBLIC SIDEWALK C 1,310 0.03 4 SOUTH PARKING LOT (ACCESS APRON)G 3,385 0.08 3 CARS 5 SOUTHWEST PARKING LOT H 5,230 0.12 9 CARS 6 TOTAL SITE AREA 45,300 1.04 PARCEL SIZE BASED ON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH 7 SITE AREA RATIO 28.53%71.47%Green space / 28.53% impervious LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER Capacity Area / Person Notes FIRE STATION 2 - BUILDING DETAILED PROGRAM LINE BUILDING PROGRAM ELEMENT SPACE TYPE / DEPARTMENT ROOM NUMBER AREA (SF)Capacity Area / Person Notes 8 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL 9 APPARATUS BAY OPERATIONS A100 1800 N/A Functional updates recommended 10 LAUNDRY / TOOL OPERATIONS A101 130 2 65 Remodeling project recommended 11 HOSE TOWER OPERATIONS A102 90 N/A Demolition and conversion to storage space recommended 12 OFFICE OPERATIONS A103 130 2 65 Remodeling project recommended 13 WOMEN SUPPORT A104 75 1 75 ADA compliance - remodeling recommended 14 MEN SUPPORT A105 75 1 75 ADA compliance - remodeling recommended 15 JANITOR CLOSET SUPPORT A106 5 N/A Remodeling project recommended 16 LOUNGE FIRE STAFF / PRIVATE A107 500 10 50 Remodeling project recommended 17 MECHANICAL BUILDING SERVICES A108 100 1 100 See facility assessment for deferred maintenance recommended 18 HALLWAY SUPPORT A109 75 Remodeling project recommended 19 MAIN FLOOR LEVEL SUBTOTAL 2980 20 TOTAL NET SQUARE FEET 2980 NSF 21 NET TO GROSS MULTIPLIER 1.06 22 TOTAL GROSS SQUARE FEET 3150 GSF PROGRAM SUMMARY 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 1 of 2 23 AREA BY DEPARTMENT # OF STAFF NET AREA (SF) % TOTAL AREA / STAFF 24 OPERATIONS 10 2150 72.15%215 25 SUPPORT 0 230 7.72% 26 FIRE STAFF / PRIVATE 10 500 16.78%50 27 BUILDING SERVICES 0 100 3.36% 28 TOTAL FTE 20 2980 100.00% 0 29 POTENTIAL NEW PROGRAM AREAS QTY 30 NONE RECOMMENDED FOR THIS LOCATION N/A N/A N/A Remodel, Update finishes, modernize ADA compliance, decommission hose tower 02.23.2022 Chanhassen Facilities Master Plan Study 2 of 2 C. MEETING NOTES 110 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. The purpose of the meeting was to review the proposed planning and facility assessment process, understand stakeholder goals and discuss the deliverables and outcome of the project process. INFO 2. The team reviewed and discussed options for the proposed schedule starting with a review of the previous schedule included in the RFP response. Two alternate schedules were presented to show how an extended timeline would allow for more time to develop and react during the process. INFO PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 08/10/2021 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Fountain Conference Room SUBJECT Project Kickoff Meeting PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Jerry Ruegemer, Parks & Recreation Director Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Don Johnson, Fire Chief Kelly Strey, Finance Director Rick Rice, IT Manager Tim Kittila, KA Dustin Phillips, KA Jason Rentmeester, KA Matt Kreilich, SK James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 111 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 3. The option 2 schedule is preferred to allow for the process to be completed in early December. SK will provide an updated schedule based on the discussion. The group noted the following: 1. Proposed dates for facility assessment tours are August 26th and August 27th. 2. Week 1 and 2 will focus on review of the City’s existing documents and research. 3. Task 1.9 should occur the week of October 11 (week 10) to better coordinate with the City Council schedule. 4. City Staff to review how best to share information about the schedule and process with all city departments / staff. SK 4. Tim Kittila reviewed Kraus-Anderson’s proposed facility assessment process. The first step after receiving the City’s existing documents is to conduct interviews with facilities staff and review the site and buildings of the five facilities. Proposed schedule for site visits: 1. August 26th – Both fire stations and Old Village Hall 2. August 27th – City Hall and the Rec Center INFO 5. City of Chanhassen noted that the evaluation of the City Hall building should include interviews of all departments to better understand how each user group feels things are currently working for them. Using a survey process was suggested as one way to gather input and allow more people to share comments. SK/KA will focus on facilities operations interviews first and work with the City to develop a strategy for broader user engagement. SK/KA 6. The recreation center work will need to be coordinated with the school and take into consideration the partnership. INFO 7. City of Chanhassen will provide a sharefile link to access their existing building drawings and information. (As of the date these notes were published drawing files have been transferred and received by SK/KA.) City 8. City did not recommend touring or considering the water treatment plant as a part of this study as it is unlikely to be changed or repurposed for any other use. INFO 112 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 9. The City would like to consider and evaluate the Public Works building and the Library facility to better understand how all of the City’s assets may influence / inform the master plan long term. These facilities won’t be reviewed as a part of KA’s facility assessment process but SK will visit and evaluate these facilities to inform the broader understanding of the City’s property and opportunities. SK 10. Each City attendee was encouraged to share their goals and thoughts about what is most important for their role / department. Attendees are encouraged to share additional comments by communicating through Charlie Howley to the design / assessment team. INFO 11. Fire Department – Don Johnson 1. Land for station 3 – When do we (the city) need this and where would it make the most sense to locate a third station house (future growth). 2. Station 2 is old and out of date, options for update or replacement should be evaluated. 3. Operationally the City would like to transition to a more focused model. 4. Fire administration staff work out of City Hall and need more space. 5. The most recent work for Fire is a locker room renovation project. 6. Fire station locations may need to be addressed. 7. Amount of space available is too limited for Fire to succeed. 8. Options should include exploring how facilities could be expanded. 9. A fire study has been completed recently and will be shared for review. (As of the date these notes were published the fire study has been sent and received by SK/KA.) INFO 12. Finance Department – Kelly Strey 1. The study should be a comprehensive look at everything (all City Assets) to determine the best opportunities. 2. The study should take a long term look at everything. (both challenges and opportunities) 3. Provide realistic budget estimates for future projects. Do not underestimate the potential costs of projects. INFO 113 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 13. Parks & Recreation – Jerry Ruegemer 1. Refer to the Park & Rec system plan 2016-2017 for additional info 2. The study was “a look under the hood”, and included stakeholder meetings and community engagement 3. Residents have long asked, “Where is the pool?” 4. Understand how the community accesses services (1995 age of existing facility) · What’s next, refresh? Or start new? 5. Understand the context of Lifetime and Snap Fitness headquarters being located in Chanhassen 6. Current user audience = boy scouts, school groups 7. Start from system plan assumptions for indoor and outdoor needs, understand facility envy of other communities, no current water component 8. Understand joint powers agreement, shared facility with school district INFO 14. Community Development – Kate Aanenson 1. Understand community needs for downtown gathering 2. Review parking for City Hall? Expanded parking needed pre-covid. 3. Understand support needed for facilities 4. Library = the community gathering room 5. Congregate dining – should the City continue operating this program? 6. Can there be better separation of spaces for departmental uses INFO 114 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 15. City Manager – Laurie Hokkanen 1. How can our facilities convey our staff’s commitment to the community and the quality of the work and service that we project. Chanhassen is a great community to support. 2. Update facilities so that staff feel like they are supported in where they work, temp control and acoustic separation are both big issues and problematic in many existing spaces. 3. 6M was recently invested in an open office remodel, this work model and environment should be reviewed and better understood. The open office work environment may not be the right fit for City Staff. 4. Council chambers are currently not large enough to support the community size Chanhassen has grown to. 5. In many areas there is a lack of natural light, and staff need more access to daylight. 6. Can there be better separation of spaces for different departmental uses. INFO 16. City Engineer / Public Works – Charlie Howley 1. In general, the public works building is in good shape, the property could be considered for other uses. 2. How can the long-term goals support the strategic plan? 3. The City wants to better understand our assets. 4. Create a long-term plan for maintenance and growth. 5. Operational excellence and resident support are key goals 6. Create a satisfied work force to provide great opportunities – developing options is key to moving forward. 7. Aligning budgets and financing with the future projects. INFO 115 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 17. Information Technology – Rick Rice 1. City hall is pieced together right now and needs to be reorganized. 2. Security is an issue, there is no physical way to separate secure locations where necessary. 3. Access control is not consistent and complete, the main system also needs to be upgraded and/or replaced. 4. Wayfinding in other cities is easy to understand, upgrades in Chanhassen facilities are needed. 5. Digitizing of paper documents is currently in process – Rooms previously used for physical document storage can be repurposed for other uses. 6. HVAC issues and adjacencies need to be resolved. INFO 18. Facilities Maintenance Supervisor – Kevin Zittel 1. Wayfinding and circulation for visitors is not good or easy to understand. 2. Facilities wants to understand what needs to be replaced and when and create a 30 year plan for deferred maintenance · What can we live with now? · What is our plan B? · What is the cycle for funding? · What needs to be addressed immediately? 3. Safety is an issue that needs to be evaluated and considered at all facilities. Both visitor and staff safety are important issues to evaluate. INFO 19. General discussion 4. Are there ways to grow and leverage partnerships to help expand or share costs and future building projects? · In partnership agreements, who is responsible for what? · Library building is owned by City but leased by County · Some of the existing agreements are too generic or simple handshake agreements that create confusion for maintenance staff. · Who is responsible for what when it comes to maintenance? INFO 116 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 20. Facilities Maintenance Assessment process notes: 1. Please let SK/KA know if there are any special requirements for visiting facilities (Covid, or other?) 2. Access key cards and master keys are requested to allow site visitors to see all spaces within each facility. 3. When visiting the Rec Center – Check in at the front desk. 4. Review team may include additional MEP staff from KA for systems evaluation. 5. City facilities staff are requested to be present for interview portion of the process. Staff are welcome to accompany the site walk through but SK/KA can conduct this portion of the work independently if needed. City 21. City will provide a current map of all City Owned Property for review and use during master plan process. (As of the date these notes were published the City map has been sent and received by SK/KA.) City 22. City to review and provide feedback from council on community desires and needs for shared resident spaces? Send feedback and comments to Charlie Howley to communicate to SK/KA · Wilder room at the library is the main community gathering space · Access control and separation of the public is important for safety. City facilities should be secured from the public at night. City 23. Partnerships with Lifetime have been discussed often in the past, but at this time Lifetime doesn’t need partnerships with Cities. There may be other ways to gather support from Lifetime. INFO 24. The City has experienced two previously failed referendums to build a community center in 1988, and 1999. The last parks bond was 24 years ago. Parks really needs to better understand if the current facility is good for the future? INFO 25. The meeting time did not allow for deeper discussion into City Sustainability goals and objectives. SK / Public Works will work together to review and ensure this discussion is incorporated into the process and future discussions. SK 117 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 26. Meeting next steps: 1. Receive City provided information and begin project research. 2. Conduct Facility site tours and facility assessment interviews on August 26/27. 3. Provide a copy of meeting notes, agenda and the presentation shared during the meeting. SK / KA Attachments: 210810_CFPS_ProjectKickoff_Agenda.pdf 2021_08_10_CFPS_ProjectKickoff.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 118 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: City Hall – Fountain Conference Room Meeting Time: 3:30pm-4:30pm, August 10, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY KICKOFF 1. Attendee Introductions n. James Howarth, Project Manager/Architect: Snow Kreilich Architects 2. Project Schedule a. Review RFP schedule and milestones and proposed revised overall schedule b. Review facility assessment process schedule c. User needs / engagement milestones 3. City Staff Input a. Goal setting for the project b. Sustainability specific targets c. Availability of existing building information / drawings 4. Review Deliverables a. Review work plan deliverables b. Confirm expectations and outcomes 5. Review Next Steps a. Review short term schedule (month of August critical activities) 6. Questions END OF DOCUMENT a. Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager b. Jake Foster, Assistant City Manager c. Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer d. Jerry Ruegemer, Parks & Recreation Director e. Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director f. Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor g. Don Johnson, Fire Chief h. Kelly Strey, Finance Director i. Rick Rice, IT Manager j. Tim Kittila: Kraus-Anderson k. Dustin Phillips: Kraus-Anderson l. Jason Rentmeester: Kraus-Anderson m. Matt Kreilich, Design Principal: Snow Kreilich Architects 119 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 MEETING SUMMARY Subject: City of Chanhassen Facility Condition Assessment – Site Interview- Fire Station 1 Date: August 26, 2021 Time: 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM ATTENDANCE Name Group Role E-mail Cell Phone ☐ Kevin Zittel Kzittel@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 612-403-6379 ☐ Don Johnson djohnson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 952-227-1152 ☐ James ☐ Charlie ☐ Michael Pierson KA Facility Asmt Specialist Michael.pierson@krausanderson.com 612-503-6184 ☐ Dustin Phillips KA Project Manager matt.steffen@krausanderson.com ☐ Tim Kittila KA Fac. Asmt. Manager tim.kittila@krausanderson.com 651-587-7327 ☐ Jason Rentmeester KA Project Manager jason.rentmeester@krausanderson.com MEETING AGENDA 2.1 General Information a. 1973- Village Hall- had one (1) bay b. 1988- Addition- Bldg, HVAC, Plbg- added second set of bays and current front office area c. 2013- Electrical d. 2020- Bldg – remodel bathrooms, lockerrooms, converted office space into crew areas, converted a small conference into a supervisor space e. Don been with the group since May 2014 f. Kevin has been with City for three (3) months 2.2 02-Sitework a. Parking lot – sealed and restriped- (fresh coat of gravel) b. Concrete- probably from 1988 c. Drainage issues on north wall d. Had some water come in the building- in corner of basement, office meets bay – three (3) years ago 120 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 e. Memorial in front of building 2017/2018, Planters were there, the obisques were placed on top of planters, footings were substantial f. Some cracking on the planters- moisture from the caps g. Parking lot lights- has a proposal to switch to LED- lights will be update- fixtures will be update – Kevin will provide h. No wall washes i. Flagpole is maintained by parks j. No issues with site lighting k. Irrigation- Original- added some new timers and intermediate controls- tied to the park- monitored by their office valves are probably all 1988 l. Parking lot – not ADA compliant do public events m. Parking lot is adequate n. Signage for fire parking lot o. Updated some plantings- most of the junipers were replaced with rock 2.3 03- Building Structure a. No noted concern 2.4 04- Foundation slab on grades a. Settling on the apron in front of fire hall – needs to be replaced in Bay 1 b. Bay floors have epoxy flooring - $36K- needs to be replaced, recoated 2.5 05- Exterior Enclosure a. All original to build b. Doors- getting caught on front door, main back door entry c. Windows all original to build d. No tuck pointing or gasket/expansion joint repair known per Don’s time e. No known issue of water infiltration f. Overhead doors- replaced a spring, original installed- all original g. Replaced one (1) opener h. Safety mechanisms- pressure sensor only, no eyes i. Bollards at all doors 2.6 06- Roof a. 2016-2017-2018- EPDM roof was replaced b. Deterioration on corners of building c. Skylight Two (2) i. Both are original ii. Both Kalwall – original to the 1988 2.7 07-Interior Construction a. Flooring i. Replace quarry tile flooring in main areas – original ii. Carpet in main meeting area needs to be replaced iii. Crew rooms were replaced with LVT/carpet tiles in 2020 iv. Kitchen is VCT- original b. Walls i. Painted in 2020 c. Ceiling i. Tiles were painted – all original and grid d. Lighting i. T8’s throughout 121 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 ii. Some Can lighting e. Bathrooms i. Upstairs- renovated in 2020, replaced fixtures ii. Downstairs- includes locker rooms (M/W) - renovated in 2020 f. Any known HAZMAT? i. Not to their knowledge 2.8 08- Equipment Furnishing a. Hard gear sanitizer- coming and ordered b. Washer was upgraded- 2017 c. Dryer needs to be updated- d. Hose tower/hose drying – in good shape e. 100% furnishing replacement i. Could use new chairs ii. New sofa’s iii. New cabinetry f. Kitchen i. In decent shape for range/stove/fridge/microwave g. Did purchase new office/desk for renovated crew rooms and office space 2.9 09- Special construction a. Two (2) IDF’s i. One is smaller downstairs ii. One is for the old phone system – is all now DOA, switched to VOIP 2.10 10- Conveyance a. None 2.11 11- Fire Protection a. Replaced fire panel in 2020, crew rooms required additional notification- need to add b. Fire sprinkler piping is all original 2.12 12-Plumbing a. All original- with exception of retrofitted area b. Added a commercial softener (2020) c. Water heater (1)- replaced in 2019 d. Water heater (downstairs)- check age e. Floor drain has to be maintained by utilities- collects to basin – sucked out with VAC truck (Every 6 months) i. Floor drains are circular floor drains, leads to standing water ii. New slot drains 2.13 13-HVAC a. Four (4) units – condensers on the roof- one (1) was replaced, the others are aged b. Two (2) furnace units – one in mezz, one in bathroom c. Gas-fired heaters for bays d. Two (2) fans that don’t really move air- need to be replaced e. COVID funds- added the UV to the systems – some were changed, some were modified 2.14 14-HVAC Controls a. New controls – T-stat, Zoned rooms for sleeping- with 5 degrees temperature 2.15 15- Electrical a. Generator- Diesel- 200 Gallons b. Electrical should be vintage based upon time of build 122 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 2.16 16- A/V a. Replaced TV’s in crew rooms in 2020 remodel b. Downstairs TV’s have been replaced 1 c. HDMI- switch only- no presentation type setup 2.17 17- Technology/ES a. Cat 5 in building, now transitioning to Cat 6 b. IT pulls a lot of the LV c. Fiber up to buildings d. Security Cameras i. Installed two (2) years ago (ProTech) ii. AXIS System iii. Coverage here is good e. Card Access i. Installed two (2) years ago (ProTech) f. Wi-Fi is terrible needs to be updated- Rick is aware- routers need to be upgraded g. Good cell phone coverage in the building 123 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 MEETING SUMMARY Subject: City of Chanhassen Facility Condition Assessment – Site Interview- Fire Station 2 Date: August 26, 2021 Time: 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM ATTENDANCE Name Group Role E-mail Cell Phone ☐ Kevin Zittel Kzittel@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 612-403-6379 ☐ Don Johnson djohnson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 952-227-1152 ☐ James ☐ Charlie ☐ Michael Pierson KA Facility Asmt Specialist Michael.pierson@krausanderson.com 612-503-6184 ☐ Dustin Phillips KA Project Manager matt.steffen@krausanderson.com ☐ Tim Kittila KA Fac. Asmt. Manager tim.kittila@krausanderson.com 651-587-7327 ☐ Jason Rentmeester KA Project Manager jason.rentmeester@krausanderson.com MEETING AGENDA 2.1 General Information a. 1980- referendum as a part of city hall, added fire station b. Major changes- had an extractor machine that ran on three (3) phase, no three (3) phase at station c. Stores one (1) engine, storage, runs rarely 2.2 02-Sitework a. Parking lot – redone in 2019/2020 b. Not well lighted on building structure c. Minor cement repairs, resurfaced the lot, - 8 parking spots d. Irrigation 2.3 03- Building Structure a. Decommissioned hose tower – ships ladder- no longer safe- OSHA has identified as inadequate 2.4 04- Foundation slab on grades a. Concrete is in good shape 124 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 b. Need epoxy flooring- would like to go to polish concrete c. Wood frame 2.5 05- Exterior Enclosure a. Doors are original b. Windows are original c. Photo eyes on garage door d. Vinyl siding 2.6 06- Roof a. Roof is original- Asphalt roof 2.7 07-Interior Construction a. Small day room to do reports- b. 20 x 20 TV kitchenette space – small fridge/stove c. All original d. Bathrooms are original e. Small utility area for washer and tool room 2.8 08- Equipment Furnishing a. All original furniture 2.9 09- Special construction a. None 2.10 10- Conveyance a. None 2.11 11- Fire Protection a. None 2.12 12-Plumbing a. All original- with exception of retrofitted area b. Added a commercial softener –residential c. Water heater (1)- original d. One (1) old water fountain 2.13 13-HVAC a. Original furnace and AC- both original b. Bay heater- natural gas 2.14 14-HVAC Controls a. T-stat 2.15 15- Electrical a. Portable b. Single – Phase 200 AMP Panel 2.16 16- A/V a. Just a TV 2.17 17- Technology/ES a. Internet and WIFI- fed by hotspot b. Does have Fiber in the building 125 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 MEETING SUMMARY Subject: City of Chanhassen Facility Condition Assessment – Site Interview- Rec Center Date: August 26, 2021 Time: 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM ATTENDANCE Name Group Role E-mail Cell Phone ☐ Kevin Zittel Kzittel@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 612-403-6379 ☐ James ☐ Charlie Jodie Sarles jsarles@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 951-227-1401 Jerry Ruegemer jruegemer@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 951-227-1121 ☐ Michael Pierson KA Facility Asmt Specialist Michael.pierson@krausanderson.com 612-503-6184 ☐ Dustin Phillips KA Project Manager matt.steffen@krausanderson.com ☐ Tim Kittila KA Fac. Asmt. Manager tim.kittila@krausanderson.com 651-587-7327 ☐ Jason Rentmeester KA Project Manager jason.rentmeester@krausanderson.com MEETING AGENDA 2.1 General Information a. 1995, 2001- 111K SF b. Roger - 25 years with district, been with the school the whole time c. Jodie- 13 years d. Jerry- 31 years 2.2 02-Site Conditions a. Parking lot- West parking lot resurfaced two (2) years ago- Mill and overlay (School) b. Parking lot- East parking lot- in need of refurbishment i. Can see some parking jams during major pickleball c. Lighting i. Original – 1995 ii. Every couple years d. Expansion- far northern part- 1998/1999 126 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 e. Deal with city is the rec center- city takes care of that parking lot. f. District takes care of the bus loop- g. High water table- this property is wetland h. Parking lot lights – Transitioned to LED i. Sidewalk entry walk lights were 2014 j. Sidewalks - same program- identified get replaced k. Baseball fields/soccer fields/hockey rinks/tennis courts/pickleball – all rec center i. Tennis courts- 2019 (Two) ii. Pickleball- 2013- redone in 2019 iii. Backstops for baseball fields- 1995 iv. No dugouts (just benches) v. Added a 6th field l. Skating rink between two (2) ball fields i. Redid the surface- 15 years m. Fencing- 1995 i. Added interior fence in 2013 for pickleball n. Warming house- 1995 i. Plumbing- one room and mechanical and storage- no AC in this building o. Playground- 4 to 5 years ago- 2015- put in new equipment (School) p. Drainage issues in playground- poor place for playground- lots of issues with ponding q. On the fields and around the building, irrigation at this site – on the fields r. Drain tile around the building, gravity flow storm drain (put in after the building) 2.3 03-Building Structure a. No issues with building structure b. No cracking, no settlement c. Some brick breakouts, some tile breakage- lot of tile repair d. Water seepage, through tile, carpet, Marmolium, STEM room – NO ISSUES ON Rec Center 2.4 04-Foundation/Slab-grade a. No loading dock- overhead door only, surface unload b. Heaving on front aprons and sidewalks- have to have it ground 2.5 05-Exterior Enclosures- a. Windows are original- replaced a few with broken seals (mainly on the school side) b. Since 2018- 10 glass have been replaced (would not do a window replacement)- under $5K - not a high dollar item c. Estimate on tuckpointing- doing it this summer, resealing with everything with but the construction joints, - Control Joints have been redone at some point- in good shape ($80K Tuckpointing on building) d. Exterior Doors - most are original - a few fire doors off the media center- entry doors are doing well, some threshold work- some of the steel doors are rusting- will be painted, secondary exits- will paint this summer i. Rec side has painted their exterior doors ii. Thresholds heaving e. Gym Doors leak i. Center post is rusted f. No known leaks into the facility from the facade g. Handicap doors- need to be replaced and address 127 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 2.6 06-Roof a. leaks on roof- 2015 replacement- working well (2015 for Roof on Rec Center) it is now resolved b. EFIS work was done in 17/18 - metal panels- standing seam 2.7 07-Interior Construction a. Moveable walls are being removed and replaced at time of review- Huffcore b. Replaced counter tops in meeting rooms and locker rooms c. Bathrooms- all original- all sinks got upgraded to fixtures last year and drinking fountains i. Replace a partition in men’s room d. Surfaces and doors/interior construction- all vintage of the school e. Bathroom partitions are in bad shape, Kitchen bathroom partitions were redone, pretty much original f. LED transition is complete g. Wood gym floor- taken down to raw wood- 2018- refinished h. Added more lights in the Gym in 2010 i. Carpet was replaced in 2015 (Carpet squares) j. Ants issue k. Ceiling tiles mostly original with exception of a few areas l. Some damage to interior doors m. Front lobby – oil leakage going into vestibule- leaked through the ceiling n. No family bathrooms o. Curtain in gym- sometimes gets pulled and can see people changing 2.8 08-Equipment Furniture a. Tables and Chairs are original i. Added a few b. Lobby furniture was redone c. Lockers are original i. Need to be redone d. Casework- some replacement i. Bleachers on rec center side of gym - manual bleachers- old wood ones- (shared expense with rec) ii. Pass inspection iii. They are due iv. Unsure on capacity 2.9 09-Special Construction a. Basketball Hoist - all original to the building i. Need to be replaced (six – 6) b. Gym Curtain- does not work- permanently closed i. Discussion of a permanent wall 2.10 10-Conveyance- a. No lifts 2.11 11-Fire protection a. All Wet sprinkler piping b. Fire panel- is new panel 2017/2018 i. Showing “Trouble” alarm ii. Alarms are disabled for security 2.12 12-Plumbing 128 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 a. All original b. Water heaters - replaced in 2018 c. Softeners - 2016 d. Mixing valve problems on rec center side and progress this way - its been getting fixed as things turn-up e. No known drainage issues f. Bottle fillers- brand new g. Lockerrooms on the Rec center side i. Heads have been change h. Some issues with acoustics between room 2.13 13-HVAC a. Condensing unit #2 replaced in 2018 b. Condensing unit #5- compressor replaced in 2018 c. Condensing unit #6, #7- replaced fans in 2020 d. Replaced zone damper in Unit #6 in 2020 e. AHU #6 - replaced outside air damper- 2021 f. Recommissioned in 2020- most have been addressed- will be address- 300+ items g. Automated logic- has biggest list h. VFD’s replaced seven so far- good for a replacement i. Exhaust fan- had to replace one(1) so far - 2020 j. Boilers were replaced in 2014 k. Repair five heating coils - system did not have glycol. System now has glycol- propylene l. Air handler 7 and Half of AHU 6 for REC center m. Media center- some issues with the return air due to addition of walls n. Some humidity issues- but do have a condensing boilers to allow running for reheats in summer time o. All Unit heaters were brought back online- 2020 - 9 CUH - two (2) were piped on the outside of the wall p. Replaced fans in the fitness center- stale air in fitness center i. Air movement is a concern 2.14 14-Controls a. Automated Logic- system is old, scheduled to be updated in 2021/September b. All DDC 2.15 15- Electrical a. Replaced a transformer in 2020- noisy (School side) b. Generator- provide emergency lighting only c. Electrical issues with multiple circuits and tripping breakers d. Light switches have been updated 2.16 16-A/V a. Clocks were replaced in 2019- master clock system- runs off the cloud- runs off the master b. Radio controlled clock system is Jim’s preference 2.17 17-Technology a. Card Access- looking into adding it in the system b. Camera’s- 2011 have been updated since then c. Cell phone issues- have issues with signal in building d. Wi-fi- good 129 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 130 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 MEETING SUMMARY Subject: City of Chanhassen Facility Condition Assessment – Site Interview- City Hall Date: August 27, 2021 Time: 8:00 AM – 11:00 AM ATTENDANCE Name Group Role E-mail Cell Phone ☒ Kevin Zittel Facilities Kzittel@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 612-403-6379 ☐ Don Johnson djohnson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 952-227-1152 ☒ James Howarth Architect james@snowkreilich.com 612.752.0278 ☒ Charlie Howley Public Works Director chowley@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 952.227.11169 Rick Rice IT rrice@ci.chanhassen.mn.us ☒ Michael Pierson KA Facility Asmt Specialist Michael.pierson@krausanderson.com 612-503-6184 ☒ Dustin Phillips KA Project Manager dustin.phillips@krausanderson.com 612.419.9563 ☐ Tim Kittila KA Fac. Asmt. Manager tim.kittila@krausanderson.com 651-587-7327 ☒ Jason Rentmeester KA Project Manager jason.rentmeester@krausanderson.com 612.366.4672 MEETING AGENDA 2.1 General Information a. Original build was 1980 b. Multiple renovations 1988, 1992, 1996, 1997, 2001, 2004, 2020 i. 2020 renovations were sink upgrades in HVAC (RTU replacements). Believe that (2) remain with unknown age. KA to check on this. 2.2 02-Sitework a. Parking lot – Potentially a chip seal done between original install and now. KA will need to check on conditions. b. Parking structure lower level is mainly for library. Upper level is half library use/half city employee use. LEC staff rarely use this. Not sure on the last time any updates were made to the joints. Built in 2016. c. Concrete- Misc. repairs done over time to sidewalks and curb. ADA accessibility concerns at entries and from parking areas. 131 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 d. No real drainage issues observed on site. No pooling of water. There is concern at the corner turn to the upper parking lot due to ice buildup in the winter. Heavy focus on icing this area. i. No snow storage areas. Most gets pushed into the soccer areas where possible but the library and upper parking lot don’t offer much capacity/room. e. Issues with pavers in plaza at library. Replaced main path in 2020 due to deterioration. There is still existing pavers in rough shape. f. Parking lot capacity is quite full during most days. Events really stretched this. Upper parking is used for skate part and then when senior events take place it’s almost impossible to find parking. g. Parking lot lights- all replaced last year with LED conversion (just heads) in 2020. h. Wall packs were also switched to LED in 2020. i. No issues with site lighting capacity. j. Irrigation- tied into the park. k. Wayfinding signage can be confusing as there are currently multiple access points into City Hall – No true main entrance. l. No known/perceived issues with landscaping. 2.3 03- Building Structure a. There is separation between concrete and the building structure i. Dumpster area 2.4 04- Foundation slab on grades a. No perceived/known issues. 2.5 05- Exterior Enclosure a. All original to build. b. Doors- Original to the time the building/expansions were built. Potential upgrade to main entry at some point. c. Windows- Original to the time the building/expansions were built. d. No tuck pointing or gasket/expansion joint repair. e. No known issue of water infiltration 2.6 06- Roof a. Roof replacement is scheduled for 2023. b. Skylight Two (2) i. Both conference room and courtyard skylights are original to the time those areas were built. Had leaks in the past but were fixed. 2.7 07-Interior Construction a. Flooring i. Most finishes were probably replaced at some point after construction but most finishes are dated throughout the facility. ii. May be a want to change floor finish type based on use. Example- right now there are multiple sink locations in the building that have carpet below. Shift to carpet tile in locations where broadloom still exists. b. Walls i. Every wall is a different color. Similar to other finishes these are dated and only taken care of on an as need basis. ii. No insulation between offices. Sound transfer is a major issue in this facility. c. Ceiling i. Original to the time it was built/expanded. 132 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 d. Lighting i. LED upgrades in 2020 to entire facility. e. Bathrooms i. Only updates where to the faucets in 2020. f. Any known HAZMAT? i. No environmental assessment known but Charlie will check. 2.8 08- Equipment Furnishing i. NO wholesale changes. If a new office is built-new desk goes with it. ii. Front desk is somewhat new. iii. Casework is original to time it was built/expanded. iv. Doors and hardware is all mixed/matched. Hasn’t been updated since original construction. 1. No standard hardware set. All new right now is going Schlage but there is a mixture throughout the facility. b. Kitchen i. This was done in 2016. A Commercial kitchen was installed. 2.9 09- Special construction a. No known WIFI or Cell service issues. 2.10 10- Conveyance a. No issues with elevators. Inspected yearly and last inspection was deemed in great shape. 2.11 11- Fire Protection a. Fire sprinkler panel needs to be updated. At end of lift/capacity. 2.12 12-Plumbing a. All original.- One set of bathrooms was decommissioned into storage space. b. Water heaters original. c. Sump pumps original. Believe there to be only 1. d. Based on age some of the existing toilets are residential and not commercial. These should be updated. e. Water service is good. 2.13 13-HVAC a. Major updates in 2020 with RTUU replacement. i. Ground condensing units haven’t been replaced. Furnaces are all origina. b. No. 1 issue in this building is temperature control. Zoning is terrible based on the current use. c. Window heat loss is incredible with known 10 degree loss from one side of the room to window. d. Humidification issues with exposed aggregate floor is damp. Poor circulation of air. 2.14 14-HVAC Controls a. All off of individual thermostats to each zone. 2.15 15- Electrical a. Generator- is approximately 20 years. b. LED lighting was done in 2019. c. Electrical should be vintage based upon time of build d. Security system is useless as it isn’t zoned. Cannot lock down certain portions only but must be wholesale at this point. 133 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 2.16 16- A/V a. Moving to wall mounted systems in each room. HDMI connection for use. b. Some spaces need updates. 2.17 17- Technology/ES a. Cat 5 in building, now transitioning to Cat 6 b. IT pulls a lot of the LV c. Fiber up to buildings d. Card Access i. This needs to be considered with security issues noted about. Cards themselves could be upgraded for security reasons. e. Wi-Fi is good. f. Good cell phone coverage in the building. 2.18 - Council Chambers a. Microphones work. b. Presentation works. c. Layout doesn’t work for use now. The space is definitely too small and needs to be expanded. d. Dated for finishes. e. 134 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. The purpose of the meeting was to review IT infrastructure, current systems in place and needs for future improvements for the five facilities. INFO 2. Meeting with Rick Rice, IT department head, who has been with the City of Chanhassen for 25+ years. INFO 3. Old Village Hall: 1. No IT technology currently and no anticipated need for future improvements. 2. Building not used by City Staff, only used by the Historical Society currently. INFO 4. City Hall has many acoustic issues, sound is easily transferred between offices or other rooms. Many staff go to conference rooms to make phone calls for privacy. INFO 5. Phase One IT upgrades include CAT3 and ThinNet infrastructure upgrades: 1. Replace all patch panels for the admin side of city hall – in process. 2. Replace all card readers with higher security devices with Bluetooth capability. 3. Wireless Access Points have all been upgraded. INFO 6. Capital Budget based on a 5 year plan has traditionally been used for funding improvements. This is changing to an internal service budget. INFO PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 09/10/2021 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION MS Teams Virtual Meeting SUBJECT IT Department Interview PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Rick Rice, IT Manager Tim Kittila, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 135 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 7. The City Hall admin area does not have a separate IT closet space, existing equipment is fit in where possible in the staff work areas. INFO 8. Humidity control in the server room is an issue, there are problems with the current AC unit. 1. Maintaining 20-50% relative humidity is desired INFO 9. Security Camera replacements at City Hall are currently in process. COVID funding is being used to cover these costs. INFO 10. The current Council Chambers IT system is supporting a hybrid technology solution to accommodate council meetings with COVID safety requirements. The City Manager would like to redo/upgrade the council chamber technology completely. INFO 11. The IT department is in the process of upgrading all City staff to Laptops in lieu of desktops. This is primarily due to COVID and needs for working remotely but City policy moving forward will continue to use this approach. All staff are moving to Office 365 software. INFO 12. There are issues with the existing council chambers security. Additional card readers should be added to create a secured area, armor shield should be added to the Council Chambers Dais. INFO 13. External cameras are needed to cover the front parking lot. There is one camera to cover the back parking lot currently. Additional cameras are needed to cover the courtyard area between the Library and City Hall. Cameras are typically procured and installed by City Staff. INFO 14. Verizon is the City’s cellular phone service provider. Service inside of City Hall has been good so far. INFO 15. Fire Station: 1. New cameras were recently added outdoors, indoor cameras are requested for interior spaces. 2. Fire station 2 has 2 cameras outdoors that were installed 3 years ago. 3. There are no in process IT upgrades at either fire station at the moment. INFO 136 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 16. Recreation Center: 1. Wireless access (WIFI) is not free to use when Rec Center space is rented. Wireless access points are in need of replacement. 2. There is not enough bandwidth currently for running wireless classes out of Rec Center spaces. 3. A camera for dance rooms to notify users or allow parents to watch dance classes is desirable. 4. No access control system currently, a system should be added if this facility will continue to be used. Access control is with physical keys only at this time. 5. Surveillance cameras are set up, more data storage space is needed if more cameras are added to the existing system. INFO Attachments: City of Chanhassen-IT Review Meeting – 9-10-21.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 137 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 MEETING SUMMARY Subject: City of Chanhassen Facility Condition Assessment – IT/Technology Review Meeting Date: September 10, 2021 Time: 1:30 PM – 2:30 PM ATTENDANCE Name Group Role E-mail Cell Phone ☒ Rick Rice Chan IT-Technology rrice@ci.chanhassen.mn.us 612-xxx-xxxx ☒ James Howarth SK Architect ☐ Charlie Howley Chan ☒ Michael Pierson KA Facility Asmt Specialist Michael.pierson@krausanderson.com 612-503-6184 ☐ Dustin Phillips KA Project Manager matt.steffen@krausanderson.com ☒ Tim Kittila KA Fac. Asmt. Manager tim.kittila@krausanderson.com 651-587-7327 ☐ Jason Rentmeester KA Project Manager jason.rentmeester@krausanderson.com MEETING AGENDA 6.1 Goals and Objectives a. Complete a facility assessment of the following facilities: City Hall- 7700 Market Blvd. Fire Station #1- 7610 Laredo DR Fire Station #2- 6400 Minnewashta Pkwy Recreation Center- 2310 Coulter Blvd. Old Village Hall- 391 W. 78th St. b. Evaluation of physical condition i. Understand history of each site and structure prior improvements completed over timelines ii. Confirm age of materials, systems and equipment iii. Understanding life cycle expectations for current conditions iv. Identify damage or areas in need of maintenance c. Evaluation of system performance i. Understand if active equipment is operating correctly and at its highest efficiency 138 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 1. Review operable assemblies such as doors, windows, etc. 2. Verify performance of mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection systems (if present) ii. Understand performance of static assemblies 1. Verify performance of wall / roof insulation 2. Verify performance of building envelope to resist water and moisture transmission iii. Evaluate operational performance based on current use and space requirements 6.2 What budgets do you have planned for upgrades for the following facilities: a. Old Village Hall- no tech plans i. Possibly wireless? ii. Off Rick’s radar iii. Not on fiber plan for metro-net build out iv. Cradle point and switching- no city business happening there 6.3 General information: a. Rick’s tenure with City i. 25 years in August ii. With Fire department- very familiar with City hall and the two (2) fire stations iii. Did work with the Water Treatment IDF’s/MDF’s and Public works- network rooms in those facilities iv. Public works is the EOC- Secondary network – rebuilding that now v. Plant- primary back-up for servers (outside of City hall) vi. Office out of City Hall b. Surveillance notes: i. Two separate system between cameras and card access 6.4 City Hall a. General Notes: i. Walls are thin, people take cell phone calls outside of office areas ii. 1st Phase- had Cat 3 and Thin Net – 1. Replacing patch panels for 1st phase (Admin phase) 2. Already in progress iii. Card Access- HID Cards- replacing card readers, more secure, bluetooth enabled (started this year) iv. Transitioning from capital budget, to an internal service budget v. Does have a 5-year plan- all changing – account for software- hasn’t done that in the past b. Low Voltage Infrastructure i. LV wiring to end points ii. LV Wiring to Access Points iii. Wireless Access Points- Already been upgraded- ongoing iv. Exterior Wireless Access Points- Guest network will be locked down v. Fiber (internal- closet to closet)- Fiber Multimode closet to closet- would prefer to switch to chassis switch with new patch panels- not enough space in admin IDF area- if redesigned- near front entrance- would like to have a closet- CAT 3 Panels- mounted over mailing machines 139 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 vi. Fiber (exterior)- Working on fiber ring around the city, with the MetroNet – waiving permit fees- bringing fiber into each city building- adding major buildings to that fiber c. Data Centers/Server Rooms i. IDF Closets 1. Admin Mailing IDF 2. Building/Engineering IDF ii. MDF Closets iii. Data Center/Server Room 1. Server room – repurposed, part of the old Library- have enough space- plumbing directly over the racks 2. Fiber terminates down there 3. Humidity and AC issues – shoots for 30-50% RH Depending on season 4. Migrating equipment to cloud d. Office Technology i. Conference room A/V Technology 1. Past a. Some funding for cameras b. Further ARPA money being spent for cameras c. Council meeting- Hybrid meeting configuration- 2. Rebidding the production system – Council Chambers 3. Conference rooms are good ii. Laptops- moved a lot of staff to laptop- better prepared iii. Phone/VOIP 1. Budgeting onprem system for hosted system iv. Moving to Office 365 1. Leveraging teams e. Signage i. Digital Signage (interior)- Internal displays- one (1) in City Hall- no one is looking at it. ii. Digital Signage (exterior)- City Sign- LED Sign will need to switch to graphical display- in front of Library, connectivity is fiber through library, wireless from library to sign- posed a problem f. Physical Security i. Card Access- Upgrades to Card Access- Would like to add doors to secure upper level from lower level 1. Card access in back areas of council chambers (Secured area- doesn’t exist) 2. Armored shielding of walls ii. Surveillance 1. Add external cameras to cover parking lots- limited coverage 2. Central courtyard- would like to add cameras to that area g. Cell Phone signal i. Does not have a problem with cell phone signal in buildings (Verizon) 6.5 Fire Station #1 a. Low Voltage Infrastructure- Upgraded last year, added coax- everything is wired i. LV wiring to end points 140 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 ii. LV Wiring to Access Points iii. Wireless Access Points iv. Exterior Wireless Access Points v. Fiber (internal- closet to closet) vi. Fiber (exterior) b. Data Centers/Server Rooms i. IDF Closets 1. Network rack in lower level- no longer in use 2. Network rack in 1st floor closet ii. MDF Closets iii. Data Center/Server Room c. Office Technology i. Conference room A/V Technology- Setup like city hall, put in Crestron panels and automate if possible ii. Phone/VOIP – No phones, central PBX, will need to buy phones for building, have to convert to IP Phones d. Signage i. Digital Signage (interior) – N/A ii. Digital Signage (exterior)- N/A e. Physical Security i. Card Access – New readers being added this year ii. Surveillance – Added cameras – want to add some internal cameras (per the chief) f. Cell Phone Signal i. Lower level has poor coverage- has a booster, needs to be checked on functionality 6.6 Fire Station #2 a. Minimal IT Footprint- very little use- i. One analog phoneline ii. Fiber to building b. Low Voltage Infrastructure – No Wiring i. LV wiring to end points ii. LV Wiring to Access Points iii. Wireless Access Points – One (1) access point iv. Exterior Wireless Access Points v. Fiber (internal- closet to closet) vi. Fiber (exterior) c. Data Centers/Server Rooms – None- one wall mount only i. IDF Closets ii. MDF Closets iii. Data Center/Server Room d. Office Technology i. Conference room A/V Technology ii. Phone/VOIP e. Signage i. Digital Signage (interior) ii. Digital Signage (exterior) 141 City of Chanhassen- Facility Condition Assessments November 1, 2021 f. Physical Security i. Card Access- Card readers are getting replaced ii. Surveillance- Cameras are from last year g. Cell Phone Signal- No issues 6.7 Rec Center a. General- how much is city and how much is ECC SD? i. 1st gym is schools- 2nd gym is City ii. Rooms along the East Side of the building iii. Long term plan for building b. Low Voltage Infrastructure i. LV wiring to end points ii. LV Wiring to Access Points iii. Wireless Access Points- Budgeting replacement of wireless access points (Two (2) in gym, one (1) in exercise areas, two (2) in hallways) iv. Exterior Wireless Access Points- N/A v. Fiber (internal- closet to closet) - vi. Fiber (exterior) – Private fiber from century link from city hall- not enough bandwidth c. Data Centers/Server Rooms – One (1) wall mount in City office- switches- wiring to other rooms, not used very often – people that rent the space, use the wireless i. IDF Closets ii. MDF Closets iii. Data Center/Server Room d. Office Technology i. Conference room A/V Technology ii. Phone/VOIP – CIP Licensing e. Signage i. Digital Signage (interior) – One (1) display that connects for CC Television in lobby, board gets used for notifications ii. Digital Signage (exterior) f. Physical Security i. Card Access – None- wants to add, not budgeted ii. Surveillance – Yes, on milestone system, add some storage space, expanded per utility expansions g. Cell Phone Signal- No issues 142 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. The purpose of the meeting was to review the draft facilities assessment report information produced as a result of the site tours and facility assessment work. Tim Kittila (Kraus-Anderson) provided a brief overview of work complete and reviewed content in the assessment spreadsheet tool. INFO 2. Charley Howley (City of Chanhassen) requested that any items observed in the xcel list that are building code compliance violations be coded or highlighted so that they can easily be identified and addressed with higher priority. KA 3. City noted that all project work should be shown as beginning no sooner than 2023 due to the schedule for the current 2022 budget and City process. The City may elect to do some project work in 2022 but for budget and planning purposes, 2023 start date should be shown in the spreadsheet. KA PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 10/28/2021 1:00-4:30pm OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Courtyard Conference Room SUBJECT Facility Assessment Draft Report Review PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Jodi Sarles, Parks & Recreation Director Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Don Johnson, Fire Chief Kelly Strey, Finance Director Tim Kittila, KA Dustin Phillips, KA Jason Rentmeester, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 143 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 4. Since much of the work could be done immediately, the City will need to review and work on their strategy for funding and grouping the potential work identified. INFO 5. SK / KA noted that this meeting is a very detailed look at information from the process. While helpful to review to confirm this information is correct the team recognizes that the City Council presentation and workshop session will need to be a much broader summary and “big picture look”. SK/KA 6. Review of Fire Hall #1 – Assessment Spreadsheet comments – see note 7 - 18 INFO 7. Irrigation items listed, Don Johnson requested that the City confirm if irrigation work is already bundled in a future parks project. City 8. Kraus-Anderson noted that cracks were observed in the hose tower and recommends that a structural engineer review that condition further (sometime in 2022). INFO 9. Replacement of Kalwall skylight panels is recommended. KA noted that this is a proprietary product. INFO 10. City noted that an LED lighting replacement was completed after the initial facility assessment walkthrough. Almost all light fixtures were replaced except for a few locations. INFO 11. Rust on the metal column near the Captain’s Crew Room and Office was reviewed. It was noted that this was the result of a prior roof leak. See item 27 in the report. INFO 12. Ceiling tile replacement was reviewed. Don Johnson noted that previously the ceiling tiles were repainted instead of replaced. Due to the low cost, the team agreed to budget for replacement. INFO 13. Racquetball court lighting was not upgraded as a part of the LED upgrade project but does need to be done. INFO 14. Epoxy floor cost estimate was provided by the City Fire Department +/- $36,000. INFO 15. Item 87 – Don Johnson noted that the upgraded SCBA equipment does not need to be next year but should be added to CIP 1-3 years further out. INFO 16. Destratification fans need to be added to bay 4 and 5, they were not added in prior work. The existing fans should be upgraded to larger sizes / larger air volume. INFO 144 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 17. Roof Top Unit (RTU) review – There should be 2 units that are relatively new from a recent 2020 replacement project. INFO 18. The hose tower does need lighting improvements, this was not addressed in the recent LED replacement project. INFO 19. Review of Fire Hall #2 – Assessment Spreadsheet comments – see note 20 - 22 INFO 20. Item #122 – Furnace age is uncertain; it appears to have been replaced. The manufacturer label indicates Goodman brand equipment. INFO 21. Don Johnson noted that the City should review possible options for the future re-use of Fire Station #2. Renting to Ridgeview to provide 3 bays for EMS services seems like a good option to consider. The City may need to invest some money to bring it up to modern standards and then lease the facility to them? City to review options and longer term planning for Fire #2. City 22. The City should consider removal / decommissioning of the existing hose tower. The current ladder has been identified as a hazard and has been marked with caution tape not to be used. City 23. Review of Recreation Center – Assessment Spreadsheet comments – see note 24 - 34 INFO 24. If anything is shared the costs are typically split 76% school / 24% City. INFO 25. If items are purely for the City then they typically incur 100% of the costs. INFO 26. Site drainage – It is recommended to review the site and drainage with a civil engineer to determine the best route for managing storm water 1. The City needs to better understand how this impacts master plan options for the future work. What if the City sells back to the district? INFO 27. Asphalt skating rink floods and has heaving issues – ADA concerns with the site were identified. INFO 28. The warming house building wasn’t addressed during the school tuckpointing project. INFO 145 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 29. Expansion joints and control joints were done for 2021, this project excluded the warming house so that building is original to 1995. INFO 30. Ballasted EPDM on the warming house needs replacement but the standing seam metal roof should have a 50-year life so it is likely ok for now. INFO 31. Locker count was requested: 100 lockers estimated for City Recreation center locker room areas. INFO 32. Moveable wall – issues with bottom not attached and kids damaging it. The final solution should be a permanent wall in place of the existing broken operable wall. (50/50 cost split is estimated by City Rec staff) INFO 33. Divider walls in meeting rooms are under construction – This is a 2021 project replacement. INFO 34. Fitness room A221 and adjacent aerobic studio room – need better fans / upgraded air circulation. INFO 35. Review of Old Village Hall – Assessment Spreadsheet comments – see note 36 - 37 36. This building currently has a $2000, 2 year lease to the Historical Society. INFO 37. The City does not desire to classify this structure as historic, there is no interest in pursuing grant funding or having limitations due to a historic status classification. INFO 38. Review of City Hall – Assessment Spreadsheet comments – see note 39 - 59 39. Verify how the overall costs for deferred maintenance compares to possible master plan options – remodel / partial addition / full new building. SK/KA 40. Lorie – Please add entrance numbers / labels for where the issues are listed for exterior items in the spreadsheet. KA 41. Water on the lobby area floor – HVAC / humidity issue. INFO 42. AV is handled separately – CIP funding covers that currently. 1. AV room for council chambers is on the list but with no dollars appropriated. INFO 43. Lorie – furniture age should not be included in deferred maintenance – all items could go into a projected FF&E budget – what would it cost to replace all furniture per building / department? INFO 146 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 44. Senior center countertop was recently replaced. INFO 45. Lower level ACT – leave on for future replacement as a part of possible remodel projects. INFO 46. Wet bar area is currently in ok condition, take off long term planning. KA 47. Commercial kitchen – works well as-is – potential for appliance upgrades, exhaust fan may not be working correctly when they are cooking (smoky during use)? 1. Charlie will check on when the kitchen was installed / upgraded? (email from Charley Howley confirmed 11/12/21 this project was done in 1997) INFO 48. Funds allocated for finishing the storage area should be addressed in the master plan analysis and not a part of the deferred maintenance budgeting. KA 49. Update and confirm the costs associated with fixing the moisture intrusion at the lower-level restrooms. KA 50. Water leak at elevator stair was fixed by Kevin – roof repair needs to track and take care of this, water dripping from roof penetration area. INFO 51. Charlie – high density file storage – include demo costs, this is a city project to be done relatively soon – 3 areas total in the existing spaces. KA 52. Combine act repairs to all levels instead of multiple line items – Charlie. KA 53. Evidence room – no proper ventilation – add costs for ventilation system that is necessary – Kevin. KA 54. Entrance bathrooms were updated with touch free fixtures recently 2020 – other items are original 1. Long term – upgrade public restrooms to hand dryers INFO 55. Kevin and Charlie – confirm annual maintenance costs for elevators. 1. Controls upgrade will be required in the next few years, hydraulic pump. 2. (Email from Charley Howley confirmed 11/12/21 it goes up a little every year, about $20, but 2021 was $675. We had service done in 2018, for a fee of $1660.) City 147 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 56. Fire protection system – needs to be addressed now – Kevin estimates 2022-23. INFO 57. Possible ventilation issue on very humid days? Charlie indicates that this needs to be captured to address staff comments and from seeing the obvious impacts on the building. INFO 58. (black heating equipment) Extra-large furnaces – labeled as boilers – City is in the process of getting pricing for this replacement – 50,000-60,000 estimated? INFO 59. Kelly – can we fix the acoustic issues? Is that cost included? 1. Team can review existing drawings to determine how the existing walls were constructed and determine possible options to improve acoustics. SK/KA 60. Kraus-Anderson will provide an online link for the City to further review and comment on the facility assessment spreadsheets in more detail as they are further updated and refined. KA 61. User survey results have been received and will be evaluated. SK 62. (email from Charley Howley confirmed 11/12/21 Fire Station #1 parking lot was last chip sealed in 2015.) INFO Attachments: None. These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 148 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: City Hall – Fountain Conference Room Meeting Time: 1:00pm-1:30pm, November 29, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY: city Administration, communications, & it Department 1. Program areas and functional requirements - 10 min. a. Department space needs i. Are there physical spaces needed to support your work? ii. Are there physical spaces in your department that are not needed? b. Projected staff growth by department: 5, 10, 20 year projections 2. Location(s) – 10 min. a. Current uses / limitations based on where your department works b. Are there opportunities for efficiency based on shared space / equipment c. Desired adjacencies i. Within department ii. With other departments 3. Questions / Comments – 5 min. END OF AGENDA Meeting Notes: Extra desk in server room, and storage area 1. Ideally working staff could be consolidated into a single area. City admin – small conference space for City Admin 2. Similar in size to planning conference room a. Acoustic issues with shared spaces. b. Sharing with other departments would ok. c. How rooms are reserved creates some issues with scheduling. d. Virtual meeting has increased conference room uses – there is a need for monitors and virtual meeting software. 3. Quantity of conference spaces and acoustics are really the main issue. 4. Academic development - needs a manager sized office space. 5. IT staff grouped is preferred. 6. Communications grouped is preferred. 149 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 7. Middle Admin Area – not enough privacy or separation a. No private space for personal / work phone calls – phone room / acoustic problems 8. Staff break room – separate from your work from your break room space a. Possibly would be used more if the space was nicer. IT staff – projects 1 additional staff in 5 years – 2 total in 10 years HR – function – 100% full time dedicated to City departments – confidentiality Currently no policy in place for people to work from home 1. Need more physically separated offices 2. Physical proximity to other departments – not necessarily important for IT or Admin 3. City Admin – is really not important for public interface a. Internal focus for this department 4. Difficult time directing the public to other departments that need to be accessed by the public 5. Reception needs to meet with and direct visitors to other areas 6. Council chambers – hold 100 - 150 people? a. Verify current size b. Doesn’t adequately convey that staff and council are on the same team due to existing seating arrangement 7. Departments are very silo’d currently – not a lot of opportunities for mixing 8. Site access and main entrance are an issue, think about ways to improve wayfinding and identify where the front door is. a. Entrance should be clearly identified from the streets / access points 9. Elderly and mobility challenged people have a hard time finding their way in or usually end up at the wrong entrance. 10. Location of the elevator – not ideal for all users, long path and difficult to find when entering on the lower level. 11. Loading dock not existing now, admin supply deliveries aren’t well coordinated. 12. Communications – works the most with Parks and Recreation need to be next to them a. Laminator is up front b. Large format plotter in engineering or building departments i. Could we have one for our work area or be closer to that equipment? ii. Layout space for working with large posters and paper? c. Drew – video needs for green screen room i. Helpful for videography communications 11 attendees invited to meet + Charlie and Kevin Admin, Communications, + IT Departments. 150 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: City Hall – Fountain Conference Room Meeting Time: 1:30pm-2:00pm, November 29, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY: Finance Department 1. Program areas and functional requirements - 10 min. a. Department space needs i. Are there physical spaces needed to support your work? ii. Are there physical spaces in your department that are not needed? b. Projected staff growth by department: 5, 10, 20 year projections 2. Location(s) – 10 min. a. Current uses / limitations based on where your department works b. Are there opportunities for efficiency based on shared space / equipment c. Desired adjacencies i. Within department ii. With other departments 3. Questions / Comments – 5 min. END OF AGENDA Meeting Notes: 1. Assistant finance director needs an office a. Payroll – needs privacy b. Needs some private meeting space 1-3 small group discussion 2. New position – financial analyst a. Open work station ok 3. Longer term – 1-2 people in 5-20 years 4. Work stations a. Future need for 2 screens b. Storage room holds confidential documents, safe and cash i. All storage within their department boundary c. Utility bill, assessments d. credit card payments for other departments i. Potential change to one stop model – instead of processing other departments payments for them? 151 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. e. Change role of main City reception desk to accept and process payments f. Would like to be near front desk / and public entrance 5. Building department payments = number 1 highest volume a. Engineering requests second b. Parks and Rec third – Rec center membership fees, fitness center cash, c. Planning foruth d. Very small fees and processing for admin – very rare i. Notary payments e. Accounts payable for City admin – electronic i. Updates to manager – f. Conference room for Finance would be great i. Add seating and video screen to Kelly’s office – 2-4 people 6. Staff break area – this is a need for this department 7. Open space is ok for open office workers 8. No copier in finance a. Printing sensitive documents, should not be in shared areas if possible i. Currently using the admin copier most of the time ii. Copier and printer nearby is very important 1. Still printing utility bills and checks a. Dedicated printer for these 9. Acoustic privacy is a major issue for all spaces a. Walk through the manager office is an issue too, not a big deal for Kelly 10. Security issues with exiting and safety for staff and public interface. 4 attendees + Charlie + Kevin 152 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: City Hall – Fountain Conference Room Meeting Time: 2:00pm-2:30pm, November 29, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY: building Department 1. Attendee Introductions 2. Program areas and functional requirements - 10 min. a. Department space needs i. Are there physical spaces needed to support your work? ii. Are there physical spaces in your department that are not needed? b. Projected staff growth by department: 5, 10, 20 year projections 3. Location(s) – 10 min. a. Current uses / limitations based on where your department works b. Are there opportunities for efficiency based on shared space / equipment c. Desired adjacencies i. Within department ii. With other departments d. Constituent access needs 4. Questions / Comments – 5 min. END OF AGENDA Meeting Notes: This is the main entrance to this area for services Current plan is to move the copy area to where file storage is located Contractors and architects meet in the middle conference room 1. Conference room for 6-8 people a. Staff meetings b. Precon meetings c. Courtyard conference room used a lot as well d. 10% of people come in for public safety looking for sheriff’s office e. License bureau is an issue 2. Currently 6 workstations in the open work area a. County assessor has a 6th work area b. 4 cubicles in use 153 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. c. Next month adding 1 staff d. Department unlikely to grow in the next 10 years i. This would only change with a policy change or e. Office acoustics next to toilet area is an issue i. Needs better sound control between work areas ii. Glass walls with window blinds f. Fire department relationship is advantages – review with fire marshall is common and concurrent g. Engineering and planning are also important to be nearby i. Department heads for planning and building talk regularly ii. Shared uses would make sense if they can be organized that way h. Moving the evidence room is recommended i. If online plan review moves forward, then fire relationship is not as important i. Online plan review – in less than 5 years j. If convenient – shared plotter room with engineering would be good. k. Private entrance and exit is very important for inspectors to come and go throughout the day l. Possibly move conference to where open work room is i. Move building officials office to where plotter is ii. Move plotter to bathroom corner m. With change to online permitting, that has changed and reduced constituent access. n. Solicitors permit is the highest use. o. Messy contractor entrance – sometimes ok to separate that from the general public 8 attendees + Charlie and Kevin 154 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: City Hall – Fountain Conference Room Meeting Time: 2:30pm-3:00pm, November 29, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY: Planning Department 1. Program areas and functional requirements - 10 min. a. Department space needs i. Are there physical spaces needed to support your work? ii. Are there physical spaces in your department that are not needed? b. Projected staff growth by department: 5, 10, 20 year projections 2. Location(s) – 10 min. a. Current uses / limitations based on where your department works b. Are there opportunities for efficiency based on shared space / equipment c. Desired adjacencies i. Within department ii. With other departments 3. Questions / Comments – 5 min. END OF AGENDA Meeting Notes: Acoustic issues in conference room 1. Too far from public area – reorganize so that they don’t have to go too far into the staff areas a. Conference size needed is typically 2-6 people 2. Confidential info being heard 3. 2 offices without windows – provide daylight if possible 4. No floating space for additional staff a. Intern is sometimes added and needs a space to work in 5. Priority adjacency a. Engineering – development reviews b. Building department c. City admin 6. Department manager adjacency is important a. Need to be next to city manager and assistant city manager 155 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. b. Meet with Charlie Howley (public works) c. Meet with Building official 7. Jill – arborist – stay at city hall a. Administering grants – working with multiple departments b. Uses a city vehicle on a regular basis 8. Building storage a. Planning – a few shelves down there along with equipment i. Scheduled programming or seasonal items ii. Map storage iii. Senior commission – some parking signs at the public works facility 9. Currently sharing copier and printing in City Admin 10. Sharing public computer 11. Lunch room / staff area a. Planning refrigerator is in the conference room right now b. Lunch smells in the staff areas are undesirable 12. Staff support person for planning and Jill’s role (“Senior administrative assistant”) a. Jean – sits in the City admin open office area b. Planning, courtyard and fountain all adequate space for planning department 13. Accessibility – a. Elevator location and the difficulty with getting b. Perceived as a deterrent to visiting City services c. Senior center access from lower parking lot only d. Stairs in main area – check rise and run i. Assessment indicated treads are e. Pedestrian walk way conflict with sidewalk at parking ramp area Kate Aanenson oversees both planning and building 5 attendees + Charlie and Kevin 156 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: City Hall – Fountain Conference Room Meeting Time: 3:00pm-3:30pm, November 29, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY: Parks & Recreation Department 1. Parks & Rec Program areas and functional requirements - 10 min. a. Department space needs i. Are there physical spaces needed to support your work? ii. Are there physical spaces in your department that are not needed? b. Projected staff growth by department: 5, 10, 20 year projections c. Recreation System Plan 2. Location(s) – 10 min. a. Current uses / limitations based on where your department works b. Desired adjacencies i. Within department ii. With other departments iii. Constituent access c. Alternate City owned buildings or consolidations? i. Senior Center 3. Questions / Comments – 5 min. END OF AGENDA Meeting Notes: City Hall spaces – more storage space would be good Program preparation area is too limited and difficult to plan ahead for those events. 1. 2 full time seasonal staff every summer a. 2 people working together in a single cubicle space when this happens 2. Building storage – in the bathroom hallway storage room is where a lot of seasonal parks and recs items are piled up. a. Elevator – lack of clear route from storage b. Acoustic privacy is really challenging 3. Plan ahead for future growth a. 1 additional rec supervisor in the next 1-5 years 157 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. i. Unlikely to grow much more than that 4. Management heads work with each other often / adjacency is important 5. Often work with Finance 6. Communications department is very helpful to work together with them and plan for big campaigns and programming a. Communications does all of Parks&rec printing, social media, flyers, graphic design 7. Benefits to keeping connections with City Hall – a. Jodi comes a few times a week to meet and pickup items i. Mary (Senior center coordinator) ii. Senior center is a subgroup of park and recreation 8. Interviews for seasonal staff / reps / parents a. Current shared spaces are too big for small meetings interviews b. 1-4 person department conference 9. More storage spaces – better adjacency to storage would be helpful if possible 10. Loading and unloading is difficult but could be better a. Van loading for off-site events b. Loading dock would be desirable Recreation center: 11. More turf areas would be helpful 12. No football field for Chanhassen 13. Cricket is a desired game, no dedicated space for this currently 14. Fewer dedicated baseball fields 15. West side school parking is shared and used on the weekends a. Parking for far west field uses is encouraged to spread out traffic and cars 16. Second gym court is desired a. Pickleball interior space is needed, more time would be helpful and meet the needs 17. Meeting rooms are used for additional programs a. (yoga, fitness and other dance activities in these meeting rooms at times?) b. Meeting rooms 1-4 numbered from south to north 18. Volleyball is underserved and they could serve other community programs if more space was provided 19. Fieldhouse for indoor activities would be desirable 20. Current rec center doesn’t meet the current needs a. No alcohol is allowed on school campus / this limits activities and rentals 21. West of Lake Ann Park has been considered as a possible future community center site a. 110-120 acres may be available near Lake Ann 22. Acreage for proposed new rec center needs to be determined a. 40 acres is the City’s current estimate 23. Wetland area at existing site – civil site study is recommended and would help understand the flooding problems with the existing shared school district site a. Major issues with stoops heaving is due to poor soils b. This has been a challenge for the school district property as well 158 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. Parks Maintenance operates out of the Public works facility Attendees: Jerry Ruegemer, 2 Assistants (Pria and Mitchell), Jodi Sarles Mary Blazanin – runs the senior center Charlie and Kevin 159 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: City Hall – Fountain Conference Room Meeting Time: 3:30pm-4:00pm, November 29, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY: Engineering Department 1. Engineering Program areas and functional requirements - 10 min. a. Department space needs i. Are there physical spaces needed to support your work? ii. Are there physical spaces in your department that are not needed? b. Projected staff growth by department: 5, 10, 20 year projections 2. Engineering location – 10 min. a. Current uses / limitations based on where your department works b. Desired adjacencies i. Within department ii. With other departments c. Alternate City owned buildings? How would your day to day change if you were moved out of City Hall? 3. Questions / Comments – 5 min. END OF AGENDA Meeting Notes: 1. No space for expansion 2. Typically 3 summer seasonal interns – they usually fill into the open office areas a. Dual public window for services – really only one needed b. Public discussion happens at the window i. Daily activity multiple times a day ii. Keeping the public out in the corridor / window area is desired c. +1 staff FTE in 5 years d. +1 more in 5-15 e. Plan for 3 seasonal intern staff f. Conference room size ok for the department g. Work area – i. Printer ii. Plotter 160 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. iii. Scanner iv. Worktable v. Open air – noises from copy room vi. Ventilation for copy functions is needed h. Exit access to public vehicles is not immediately adjacent i. Engineering i. Work with planning more than building department j. Redundancy in copiers and plotters i. In case there is a technical problem with either one this is helpful ii. Other issues with sharing equipment were discussed iii. Plotter not used as much as it used to be used 1. Admin using the plotter more than engineering k. Police and finance don’t need to be near engineering? i. Fire doesn’t work with engineering very often ii. Administration not necessary to be too close to engineering l. Should engineering be at public works? m. Moving this department to public works was discussed. i. Public works superintendents often come to city hall to work with engineering ii. Collaboration on planning and design with public works 1. Day to day activities are independent of engineering 2. Construction managers job would be better if public works was closer? iii. Dennis – GIS expert 1. Works with public works often – at least once a week? 2. Lots of interface with staff on a day-to-day basis 3. Does work with planning and parks but not as much as engineering n. Some storage used in the building storage, mostly just shelving i. Storage lockers for equipment 1. Boots, hats, helmets a. Storage similar for public works gear? o. Have one shared office at public works for touch downs or part time use of the facility p. Kitchenette is not necessary, a shared staff room would be good to have though i. Shared break room q. Wall space for hanging up maps is desired r. Restroom access i. Not great for engineering department 1. Original restrooms were converted to a work area 7 attendees + Charlie and Kevin 161 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: City Hall – Fountain Conference Room Meeting Time: 4:00pm-4:30pm, November 29, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY: Fire Department 1. Fire Station Program areas and functional requirements - 10 min. a. Department space needs i. Are there physical spaces needed to support your work? ii. Are there physical spaces in your department that are not needed? b. Projected staff growth by department: 5, 10, 20 year projections 2. Fire 1 location – 10 min. a. Current uses / limitations based on where your department works b. Desired adjacencies i. Within department ii. With other departments c. Fire study proposed locations d. Alternate sites 3. Questions / Comments – 5 min. END OF AGENDA Meeting Notes: Recent changes to City Hall organization: 1. Fire chief moves NW corner with a small meeting table a. Fire Marshall in Don’s old office b. Anna and 1 other moved into SW office c. Sheriff’s office adjacency – not necessary to be together 2. Department head adjacency question needs to be reviewed with Laurie a. Prior city manager had 50/50 need for fire chief to be in City Hall 3. Fire 1 – parking is pretty good now a. Day to day is not needed to be as big as it is now 4. Giving up site area at fire 1 may be problematic a. Second floor would be desirable to maintain site programming 5. Station 3 site is not big enough for centralized station 6. Next year – add 2 FTE for fire department 162 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. a. 10 years 15 total staff – 4 on duty 7. 4 staff offices would need to be added to Fire one if city hall is no longer used for Fire staff. 8. Delete racquetball court and turn it into 1st floor admin spaces was discussed as a possible option. 9. Lower level east side storage 10. 4 crew rooms were discussed, maybe move these to a more private location 11. Front office deliveries use the main door. Public entrance existing but there is currently not much public interface. 12. Site discussion: a. Lake Ann site is preferred by Don for future centralized station. Better central location and better access to NW corner of City i. SW corner parks and rec shed location was discussed as a possible option. b. Public works consolidation site is a good idea and could work as well. i. Access road to Audubon road would be needed. ii. Fire specific access to highway 5 could be provided. 13. Skate park next to fire #1 a. Could be moved or consolidated with new recreation center? 14. Fire #3 – 10 years+ in the future a. This depends on how fast south end of the city would develop and when will there be a need to expand fire coverage to this area of the City. b. Fire 3 station is expected to be similar to Fire #2 program / building size. c. Ridgeview ambulance services is a possible tenant if fire 2 is changed into an ambulance facility instead of fire station. Secured facility – lock down at public works with Fire department was discussed as a possible possibility with a combined public works approach. The City does not currently have any options if a City lock down situation arises. 4 invites + Charlie and Kevin 163 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. The purpose of the meeting was to review the in-process work and discuss the user engagement survey information collected. INFO PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 12/02/2021 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Fountain Conference Room SUBJECT Project User Survey Review PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Jerry Ruegemer, Parks & Recreation Director Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Don Johnson, Fire Chief Kelly Strey, Finance Director Rick Rice, IT Manager Tim Kittila, KA Dustin Phillips, KA Jason Rentmeester, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 164 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 2. Survey response rates were reviewed and discussed. Perceived rating of building condition was compared to each building’s FCI rating. The following groups were reviewed: 1. City Council: low response rate, generally perceived buildings to be lower than their FCI rating. 2. City Partners: average response rate, generally perceived buildings to be slightly lower than their FCI rating. 3. City Staff: Good response rate, generally perceived buildings to be close to their FCI rating except for Fire facilities which were much lower. INFO 3. Individual responses were reviewed, and general comment themes were identified. City staff noted that some comments should be considered only in the context of their response rate / low sampling size. INFO 4. Planning and an outline agenda for the upcoming City Council meeting was reviewed. City staff requested that the FCI information be presented within the context of the assessment process and include both the positive and negative data identified. INFO 5. The downtown vision plan and potential opportunities for revised or relocated facilities was reviewed and discussed. INFO 6. The senior center programming was discussed and the pros and cons of whether it should remain a part of the City Hall or be grouped with the Recreation Center / Community Center should be considered in the master plan process. INFO 7. City requested that comparison data (to other similar sized cities) be included to help inform the Council of how the current facilities measure up to other metro city facilities. INFO 8. The Council workshop session should focus on gathering Council opinions on the current building locations, reuse or possible relocation options. INFO 165 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 9. The committee hopes to hear from the Council their opinions on what’s next for the City. The assessment data should inform: 1. Where can we make the most impact now? 2. Identify needs vs. wants and prioritize possible projects. 3. Understand the costs of maintaining, operating, and relocating staff during remodeling in comparison to the costs of new construction. INFO 10. Each City attendee was encouraged to share their goals and thoughts about what is most important for their role / department. Attendees are encouraged to share additional comments by communicating through Charlie Howley to the design / assessment team. INFO 11. Meeting next steps: 1. Next meeting is 12/13/2021 to review and prepare a draft presentation for the Council workshop. SK / KA Attachments: 2021_12_02_CFPS_ProjectUpdate.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 166 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. AGENDA PROJECT: City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study: 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Snow Kreilich Project Number: 2021.10 Meeting Location: Virtual – MS Teams Meeting Meeting Time: 1:00pm-1:30pm, December 7, 2021 City of CHANHASSEN: FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY: Senior center Department 1. Program areas and functional requirements - 10 min. a. Senior Center space needs i. Are there physical spaces needed to support your department’s activities? ii. Are there physical spaces in the Senior Center that are not needed? b. Projected staff growth by department: 5, 10, 20-year projections c. Projected change in users: 5, 10, 20-year projections 2. Location(s) – 10 min. a. Current uses / limitations based on where the Senior activities are located b. Desired adjacencies i. Between other activities ii. With other departments iii. Constituent access c. Alternate City owned buildings or consolidations? i. Community Center 3. Questions / Comments – 5 min. END OF AGENDA Meeting Notes: Section north of woodworking area – 2 shelves used for storage - Woodcarving is the program for Seniors, should not be referred to as crafts - Senior commission – City committee that oversees needs for those folks 55 and older o Senior commission meets monthly, and they meet in the fountain conference room  Transportation, services, policy makers o Senior center is a subgroup of the senior commission o Maple corner room vs large space on east side  Use based on size of programming · Any groups larger than 20 people use the east side room 167 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. · Maple room is more like a living room space o 4-18 people is the group size for this area  Maple room office was also being used for small crafts and also for small groups and small meetings o 60 people max in the City hall spaces  2-3 events per year require using the recreation center when the attendees are greater than 60. · Other events occur throughout the year some events have an attendance cap and some people end up on the waiting list · All supplies that are in city hall need to be transported to the rec center under this circumstance o Kitchen  Still viable, important for uses  No decision on congregate dining  Food is currently prepared in Waconia · These meals are packaged and brought to city hall and then brought out (delivered) to home bound seniors  City is surveying and checking in with seniors to find out if there is interest in City provided meals o Expanded woodcarving shop space  Access to larger tools and equipment for woodworking  Wood carving has an intergenerational component  Musicians practice a few times a week o Population of seniors is going to increase in the city  Wider range of people using and attending senior programming · Educational programs, not just social activities such as bingo and cards · Younger people attending with parents to learn how to support them o 2030 is the projected date for peak senior populations in MN  10,000 individuals turning 65 per day until 2030 o Front space looks a lot like a “typical” senior center  Younger seniors may want more active programming, multi- generational programming  Active seniors are also hanging out at the rec center o Pros and cons of putting the senior center in the lower level of city hall  Proximity to the emergency staff (in case of emergency situations)  Other staff upstairs can always help if the senior center coordinator needs help  Use of basic resources that are provide by other city hall departments – shared resources instead of a standalone building  Mary · Feels isolated by being in the lower level, extra help is not always easy to get · Acoustic separation is a benefit of being on the lower level o Location – the concentration of people 55+ influenced the location choice  Highway 5 was viewed as a barrier, many individuals want to stay north of highway 5 168 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail.  Many seniors do walk to the current location at City Hall · New venue apartments do have retirees living there, within walking distance o Combined community center would be a huge improvement and make a lot of sense for combining rec services and senior services  Programming can be limited because there isn’t enough staff support  Part time help staff to run programming could help improve and better use the senior spaces · Combined with Jodi staff sharing could greatly help o More tech focused – active lifestyle after retirement  Better pairing with active spaces at the recreation center o Limitations of an aging population  How do we address visual decline, loss of mobility, transportation? 169 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. The purpose of the meeting was to review the in-process work and discuss the content to be shared at the City Council workshop. INFO 2. Tim Kittila (Kraus-Anderson) reviewed the assessment information summary that would be shared at the Council workshop. INFO 3. Parks & Recreation noted that the location of the Senior Center is important to the Council and if a potential relocation is proposed it needs to be explained correctly to ensure the benefits of that idea. INFO 4. Fire Department requested that the information related to Fire Station 1 be explained to reiterate that alternatives and further exploration will occur in the next phase of work. INFO PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 12/13/2021 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Fountain Conference Room SUBJECT City Council Workshop Draft Review PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Jerry Ruegemer, Parks & Recreation Director Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Don Johnson, Fire Chief Kelly Strey, Finance Director Rick Rice, IT Manager Tim Kittila, KA Dustin Phillips, KA Jason Rentmeester, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 170 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 5. The Fire #1 slide should be checked to confirm that the costs and FCI data shown are correct. INFO 6. Add a summary of cost data for 5 and 10 year expenditures to the charts to help explain the next steps and long term costs for each facility. KA 7. Fire Department noted that the alternate uses for Fire Station 2 haven’t yet been introduced to the council and should not be included in this presentation. SK / KA 8. Review and confirm the site boundary for the Recreation center is correctly shown. SK 9. Recreation Center: 1. A refrigerated outdoor rink is desired at the existing outdoor ice rink area. 2. Increase parking is a current need. 3. Acoustics issues are present at the rec center. 4. An indoor walking track is desired. 5. A splash pad in a park is more likely than a pool facility (either indoor or outdoor). 6. Building additions should increase gym and fitness spaces. INFO 10. Change out warming house storage room photo for presentation. SK 11. Sheriff’s department should be listed as a user with future staff needs and projected growth. SK 12. Staff recommend reducing discussion about potential other locations for facilities for this meeting. SK / KA 13. Use this presentation as an update on what’s been done and focus on sharing what will be done next. SK / KA 14. Combine KA / SK presentations into a single format to reduce duplicate information. SK / KA 15. Meeting next steps: 1. Next meeting is 1/7/2022 to review the final draft presentation for the Council workshop. SK / KA 171 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. Attachments: 2021_12_13_CFPS_CommitteeCheckIn.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 172 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES JANUARY 10, 2022 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:32 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Rehm (via Zoom), Councilman Campion (via Zoom), Councilman McDonald (via Zoom), and Councilwoman Schubert (via Zoom). COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Kelly Strey, Finance Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; Rick Rice, IT Manager; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: James Howarth, Snow Kreilich Architects Tim Kitella, Kraus-Anderson FACILITIES STUDY PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION Public Works Director/City Engineer Charlie Howley introduced James Howard of Snow Kreilich Architects and Tim Kitella of Kraus-Anderson. Mr. Howard introduced and presented the facilities study PowerPoint. The presentation agenda included an Executive Summary, Review of Facility Assessment Process, Summary of Information for each facility, Next Steps, and Questions/Discussion. A team process and timeline slide was presented which included two phases: Inventory and Assess Needs; and Synthesis and Concept Tasks. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification of the evaluation process. What is included? HVAC system, roof, structural integrity of the roof, etc? Howarth stated practical and physical components of all of the facilities, user engagement surveys of City Council, Staff and City Partners that work in the facilities, identify perceptions of how people think about the buildings and how that is compared to the Facility Condition Index (FCI) rating. Tim Kitella provided an overview of results. Details can be found online. For the next 10 years it is about an $8 million investment for all five facilities. The facilities are structurally sound and adequately maintained. He reviewed the results for each of the five facilities: • City hall has considerable adequacy issues that may complicatereinvestment for its intended use based on the original design. • The Recreation Center is unable to meet the growing demand andshifts of current recreational needs for the city population. • Fire station #1 has limitations for space, but overall facility in fair condition. 173 City Council Work Session Minutes – January 10, 2022 2 • Fire Station #2 may no longer serve the city in a beneficial manner for its intended purposes • Old Village Hall: Limited investment, serves current needs. The facility assessment process included work completed September-December of 2021, identified deferred maintenance items, transferred knowledge, and developed 10-year plans for all five properties. A detailed review of each facility was presented which included site overview, building/interior, user comfort/operational efficiency, space utilization/layout, projected growth, and projected expenditures. Mr. Howarth explained the deferred maintenance costs of each facility in 5 and 10 years. A summary comparison and review of all five facilities was presented which included priorities in present day dollars. The master plan process and next steps include the following: • Evaluate current and potential alternate locations for Facilities • Explore options to accommodate future needs and changing demographics • Identify City goals for sustainability and operational efficiency • Generate cost estimates for alternatives that can be compared with Facility Assessment cost data to inform City long term financial planning and investments Phase two will occur during January-March of 2022 which include synthess and concept tasks with a summary of the results available in March/April, 2022. The City Council asked the following questions: • Why was the Public Works building, Library and water treatment plants not included in the study? Howley responded that these buildings are fairly new and there is no need for space planning. These facilities were specifically not included in request for proposals (RFP). • Who is the Public Works committee? Howley replied that the committee consisted of department heads. • How much of deferred maintenance is in the CIP? When will feedback come? Howley replied that five items have already been identified in the CIP. The operating budget covers ongoing maintenance. Deferred maintenance outlined in the study is not covered in the CIP. We will learn as we move forward and adjust future budgets. Finance Director Strey provided information on future budgeted amounts for building maintenance. A plan will be made in the 2023 budget process. • Next phase is to evaluate what’s currently in CIP, what’s worth making the investment versus doing something entirely different on a larger scale? Howley replied that it depends on decisions to be made about each facility, i.e. do we need to keep Fire Station 2? If not, then it will not need to be included in the CIP. At the Strategic Planning Session scheduled for January 31, 2022, facilities will be reviewed and discussed. There will be another check-in with Council in the future before finalizing the document. 174 City Council Work Session Minutes – January 10, 2022 3 FUTURE WORK SESSION SCHEDULE 01/24/2022 – Discuss Assessment Policy Updates, Discuss Commission Vacancies 01/31/2922 – Strategic Planning Session 02/14/2022 – Active Shooter Training Presentation, Electric Vehicle Charging Station Proposal 02/28/2022 – Commission interviews 03/14/2022 – Commission interviews and City Manager performance review 03/21/2022 – Facilities Study discussion 04/11/2022 – ARPA Discussion 04/25/2022 – Public Safety Staffing Update The meeting adjourned at 6:51 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 175 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. City Hall Parking requirements were reviewed. Planning department will confirm zoning code requirements and projected parking needs for City Hall. City 2. Skate park area could be considered for parking area and the skate park could be relocated elsewhere to a City Park or the Rec Center. INFO 3. Parks & Recreation noted that supervision of the skate park is important and having it near City Hall helps with that. INFO 4. Many people use the current parking lot access road to cut through the City site which is unsafe. INFO PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 2/23/2022 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Fountain Conference Room SUBJECT City Hall Review PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Jerry Ruegemer, Parks & Recreation Director Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Don Johnson, Fire Chief Kelly Strey, Finance Director Rick Rice, IT Manager Tim Kittila, KA Jason Rentmeester, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 176 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 5. The green space around City Hall (especially north) is well used by Parks & Recreation for events like the 4th of July celebration and having space for those functions is important. INFO 6. Staff noted that ISD 112 is considering building a new 2 story school on their field area and demolishing the existing building north of Fire 1 which would change the site around City Hall. INFO 7. Existing construction documents from City Hall should be reviewed to confirm if the structured parking was built to support a second level of parking. SK / City 8. Plans show a pedestrian connection between a proposed revised City Hall and the Fire 1 building. Staff questioned if the pedestrian path would be used much or if it should be reduced or eliminated. INFO 9. Adding a dedicated Police Department is possible in the far future and is likely not appropriate for considering at this time. INFO 10. The post office site across from City Hall is on leased property and is expected to remain (until the lease expires) for at least another 10-20 years before that land could be considered for redevelopment. INFO 11. Moving City Hall to a new campus out of downtown is a big change to the current Downtown Vision Plan. There are a number of shared uses with the Library that make sense for City Hall to remain near the current location. INFO 12. Cost data would only outline a hypothetical City Campus option since a specific property can not be identified at this time. Land Acquisition costs are likely required as the City does not currently have any parcel big enough to accommodate a new campus approach. INFO 13. Staff noted that the label “park program” should be revised to green space to avoid confusion in clarify that the existing building would be demolished and replaced with outdoor space. SK Attachments: 2022_02_23_CFPS_CityHall.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 177 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. Lake Ann Park and the Public Works area are both owned by the City currently and would be good options for a new centralized fire station. INFO 2. If a City Campus approach was considered (all facilities in a new campus) then a 120 Acre parcel would likely be needed to support all of the City’s needs. INFO 3. One more crew room is needed at Fire Station #1. INFO 4. The fire fighter’s memorial is an important part of Fire #1 and needs to be considered and respected with any changes to the facility. INFO 5. New facility considerations: 1. Better apparatus bay space desired 2. Better separation of dirty and clean spaces is desired 3. A new facility would allow for a change to the flow and organization of the facility that may better serve staff 4. An increase in staff and crew space would be desired to accommodate future department growth. INFO PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 2/23/2022 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Fountain Conference Room SUBJECT Fire Department Review PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Don Johnson, Fire Chief Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Tim Kittila, KA Jason Rentmeester, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 178 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 6. Keeping the Fire #1 facility is probably ok as long as Fire Department administration has space to operate effectively. 1. For example: If the fire admin is addressed in the new City hall building then Fire 1 can probably continue to serve the community for a while longer. INFO Attachments: 2022_02_23_CFPS_FireDepartment.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 179 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. Rooftop Air Handling units at the existing Recreation Center were discussed. 1. RTU 4 and 5 need to be replaced 2. RTU 5 is the City’s responsibility and #4 is a shared unit. 3. $350k repair cost is estimated, KA to update assessment maintenance cost data. KA PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 2/23/2022 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Fountain Conference Room SUBJECT Recreation Center Review PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Jerry Ruegemer, Parks & Recreation Director Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Director Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Tim Kittila, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 180 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 2. Considerations for if the existing recreation center continued to be used were discussed: 1. Should all systems be moved to the City side so that they are completely separate and independent? a. HVAC = yes b. Plumbing = no / not feasible c. Electrical = no / not feasible 2. Building program desired expansion: a. Running track b. Fitness programming c. Pool – splash pad ideas, outdoor pool programming? d. Dedicate pickleball facility e. Family restrooms – public restrooms f. Beverage service is limited due to no alcohol rule for school property INFO 3. Parks & Recreation noted that the existing bus loop has some low areas that need to be filled and wondered if that could be redone to increase the total parking count. Discussion / agreement would need to be considered with ISD 112. INFO 4. High water issues do exist on the property, KA noted that a civil engineering review of the water issues and soil conditions is recommended. High water limits excavation and building possibilities for vertical expansion. INFO 5. Outdoor Rec Center facilities desired: 1. Full size baseball field / stadium 2. Outdoor football field 3. Field lighting is desired to extend programming hours INFO 6. Potential site near (west of) Lake Ann was discussed where a 120 acre parcel may be available. City has not inquired about this property specifically. INFO 7. City staff will provide a list of similar facilities in other cities (comparable) that provide all of the program elements that Chanhassen desires to have. Parks&Rec 181 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. Attachments: 2022_02_23_CFPS_RecCenter.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 182 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. Updated City Hall information was reviewed and discussed in response to the 02/23/22 meeting. INFO 2. Additional building program analysis was updated and added for discussion. INFO 3. Additional City Hall site plan concept drawings were added to explore the possible location for a new City Hall facility in comparison to the remodel existing City Hall option. INFO 4. Approximate site area required to provide surface parking to meet the City’s calculated requirement would eliminate too much green space. INFO PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 3/11/2022 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Fountain Conference Room SUBJECT Committee Progress Check-in PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Jerry Ruegemer, Parks & Recreation Director Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Don Johnson, Fire Chief Kelly Strey, Finance Director Rick Rice, IT Manager Tim Kittila, KA Dustin Phillips, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 183 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 5. Two new City Hall options propose including 1 level of below grade parking to minimize the site impact but meet the desired parking count target identified. INFO 6. Pros and cons of a potential new access road were discussed and reviewed with the group. This may help alleviate traffic cutting through parking and improve access to parking and City services. INFO 7. An alternative concept floor plan for the remodeled City hall should provide IT office spaces on the upper floor with windows and access to daylight. SK 8. An alternative concept floor plan that removes the senior center program spaces from the lower level should be studied to confirm if it makes sense or allows everything to fit within the current building perimeter. SK 9. Updated Recreation Center program documents were reviewed and discussed for both the existing remodel concept and the future new community center option. INFO 10. After review of the conceptual program for the new community center and program layout diagrams it was determined that the new facility should not include an indoor pool but rather only an outdoor aquatics component. SK 11. Community center program and diagrams will be updated for next meeting: 03/18/2022 draft review of content for City Council workshop meeting. SK Attachments: 2022_03_11_CFPS_CityHall.pdf 2022_03_11_CFPS_RecCenter.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 184 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. MEETING REPORT ITEM SUBJECT ACTION BY 1. The purpose of the meeting was to review the draft Council workshop presentation info that would be shared at the 03/21/2022 meeting. INFO 2. Additional building program analysis was updated and added for discussion. INFO 3. Draft presentation content was reviewed and discussed by the group. Executive summary info was reviewed and edited for clarity. SK 4. Updated City Hall Space utilization layout graphics were reviewed. For clarity, City staff recommended only including one version of the interior remodel concept for the Council session. (delete slide 26) SK PROJECT City of Chanhassen Facilities Planning Study MEETING DATE 3/18/2022 OWNER City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 MEETING LOCATION City Hall Fountain Conference Room SUBJECT Committee Progress Check-in PROJECT NO. 2021.11 ATTENDEES Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works / City Engineer Jerry Ruegemer, Parks & Recreation Director Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Kevin Zittel, Facilities Maintenance Supervisor Don Johnson, Fire Chief Kelly Strey, Finance Director Rick Rice, IT Manager Tim Kittila, KA Dustin Phillips, KA Michael Pierson, KA James Howarth, SK DISTRIBUTION Project File, attendees REPORT BY James Howarth 185 This transmittal and the information it contains is intended to be confidential communication only to the person/entity to whom it is addressed. If you received this in error, please notify the sender by telephone and return the original to this office by mail. 5. Format for cost estimate data was reviewed and discussed, for clarity City staff recommended simplifying cost information presented. 1. City Hall – Remodel vs new building (City land) 2. Rec Center – Remodel vs new building (new land) 3. Fire 1 - Remodel vs new building (City land) 4. Fire 2 – Remodel vs Divest 5. Old Village Hall – Deferred maintenance only SK 6. For clarity and to focus the discussion, the cost data should all be included after the project summary information for each facility. SK 7. Kraus-Anderson to prepare relevant similar projects that can be used as comparable examples for other facilities at similar price ranges. Similar cost projects from comparable Cities would be best. KA 8. Next meeting: 03/21/2022 City Council workshop meeting. SK Attachments: 2022_03_18_CFPS_CouncilWorkshop_DRAFT.pdf These minutes are intended to be an accurate accounting of the meeting. Please forward corrections or comments to the writer for clarification within 7 days of receipt. END OF DOCUMENT 186 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES MARCH 21, 2022 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Schubert. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Kelly Strey, Finance Director; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Rick Rice, IT Manager; Lt. Lance Pearce, Carver County Sheriff’s Office; Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT: James Howarth, Snow Kreilich Architects Tim Kitella, Kraus-Anderson Mayor Ryan provided an overview of the work session agenda items along with a time schedule for each item. OUTDOOR STORAGE OF BOATS City Manager Hokkanen provided the City Council with a brief synopsis of the item for discussion. Specifically, potentially allowing seasonal storage of watercraft (jet skis, boats, kayaks, paddleboards, etc.) in driveways. Mayor Ryan invited Councilmembers to provide their input in this item. Councilmember Rehm would like to specifically look at boats and trailers allowing one watercraft vehicle to be parked in a driveway for a limited amount of time, i.e. from April 1 to October 1. This will accommodate residents’ desires and seems reasonable. Mayor Ryan asked Councilmember Rehm for clarification of trailers. Councilmember Rehm responded that it would be limited to a watercraft on a trailer. Councilmember Campion has similar feelings to what Councilmember Rehm proposed by limiting it to watercraft only. Also, there are so many lakes in Chanhassen and a lot of residents own watercraft. Councilmember Schubert is also in favor of allowing watercraft parking in driveways as long as setback and sight line rules are followed. 187 City Council Work Session Minutes – March 21, 2022 2 Councilmember Campion added that allowing watercraft parking in driveways would reduce the need for enforcement from resident complaints. Councilman McDonald is not in favor of allowing watercraft parking in driveways because Council previously reviewed this and it was very devisive. If only watercraft parking is allowed, the residents who own recreational vehicles would get upset because it would be the same footprint and during the same season. Residents were already given an opportunity to express their views during public meetings. Mayor Ryan agreed with Councilman McDonald. She didn’t support it previously and reiterated that it is a devisive issue and would be a challenge to defend limiting driveway parking to watercraft only. However, if this does move forward she would like to recommend shortening the allowed storage period from April to October to Memorial Day to Labor Day or something in that timeframe. She anticipates that residents who own winter vehicles such as snowmobiles would be asking for the same thing. Councilmember Rehm replied that people tend to take their boats out in mid-April to start preparing them for the boating season and a six-month timeframe would be a clean beginning and end. Many residents already keep their watercraft in their driveway and it would make it easier for staff to deal with enforcement issues. Will it be harder for staff to enforce if the time period is shorter? Community Development Director Kate Aanenson suggested that that the Planning Commission weigh in on this issue and put in some parameters on this issue and provide feedback. Some people will launch their boats but still keep the empty trailers in their driveways so there are some nuances to be discussed. Councilman McDonald asked if the City has conducted a FlashVote on this issue. City Manager Hokkanen responded that we have not but it is something we could use FlashVote for. We typically use FlashVote when public opinion would be very help to make a decision. In cases like this where the City Council has a pretty good idea of how they feel about it, it’s often not as helpful. Also, what we saw through the emails we would probably see the same thing in FlashVote. Community Development Director Kate Aanenson stated that the Planning Commission could review it at their April 19th meeting. Mayor Ryan requested that the staff report include the parameters discussed. City Manager Hokkanen suggested that the staff report provide information on specifically what the Council is considering and not that we are starting over with the process. Councilmember Rehm added that if the ordinance is passed that public education be provided. Mayor Ryan recessed the Work Session at 5:20 p.m. 188 City Council Work Session Minutes – March 21, 2022 3 Mayor Ryan reconvened the Work Session at 5:30 p.m. FACILITIES STUDY DISCUSSION City Engineer/Public Works Director Howley introduced Phase II of the facilities study and displayed a PowerPoint Presentation. James Howarth from Snow Kreilich Architects and Tim Kitella from Kraus-Anderson introduced themselves. Mr. Howarth went over tonight’s agenda and reviewed what occurred in Phase I and the schedule for Phase II. Executive Summary Mr. Kitella reviewed the findings of the five City facilities: • City Hall has adequacy issues that may complicate reinvestment for its intended use based on the original design • Recreation Center is unable to meet the growing demand and shifts of current recreational needs for the city population • Fire Station #1 has limitations for space, but overall facility is in fair condition • Fire Station #2 may no longer serve the city in a beneficial manner for its intended purposes • Old Village serves current needs and requires a limited investment The focus tonight will be on City Hall. Mr. Howarth reviewed the Master Plan process: • Evaluate current and potential alternate locations for Facilities • Explore options to accommodate future needs and changing demographics o Evaluate pros / cons of re-using existing facility structures, remodeling or adding new building additions o Evaluate pros / cons of building new replacement facilities • Identify City goals for sustainability and operational efficiency o Evaluate pros / cons to identify strategies that can align with City mission, goals,and long term plans • Generate cost estimates for alternatives that can be compared with Facility Assessment cost data to inform City long term financial planning and investments The following Master Plan Options were presented: City Hall • Stay in place: Remodel / Building Addition • New facility on City-owned property • New facility at alternate location (new City campus) 189 City Council Work Session Minutes – March 21, 2022 4 Recreation Center • Stay in place: Remodel / Building Addition • New Facility at alternate location (new City campus) Fire Station #1 • Stay in place: Remodel / Building Addition • New facility on City-owned property • New facility at alternate location (new City campus) Fire Station #2 • Prepare for alternate use: Remodel / fix accessibility issues and deferred maintenance projects Old Village Hall • Maintain current use: Deferred maintenance project(s) Work completed between January and March, 2022 was reviewed. Project cost estimates were calculated to include hard costs, soft costs, owner costs, project cost, and cost escalations for anticipated future change in costs over time. Mr. Howarth reviewed each facility that included the following information: • General information (includes year built and major remodel /building projects) • Current use • Facility comparisons (Recreation Center) • Building area • Deferred maintenance (includes HVAC, exterior enclosure, roof, interior construction, site work, plumbing, etc.) A summary and site program analysis was provided for each facility which included goals for each facility. Cost data for each facility option along with next steps was presented. Finance Director Strey reviewed budget impacts. Discussion/Next Steps • Review and confirm the proposed project scope(s) aligns with the City’s goals and priorities • City Hall – Retrofit versus build new • Recreation Center – Referendum Task Force to clarify and review the scope • Fire Stations – To be determined pending other decisions • Finalize Master Plan Study for City Council action 190 City Council Work Session Minutes – March 21, 2022 5 Mayor Ryan asked when the next facilities discussion would take place. City Manager Hokkanen provided an update on the future work session schedule as well as upcoming Referendum Task Force meetings. The future work session schedule was rearranged so that the facilities discussion could continue at the April 11, 2022 Work Session. FUTURE WORK SESSION SCHEDULE The future City Council Work Session schedule was updated as shown below: 04/11/2022: Facilities Study Discussion 04/25/2022: Fire Department/Public Safety Staffing Update, ARPA Discussion, Short-Term, Rental, and Business Licensing, City Council Roundtable 05/09/2022: Park Referendum Update 05/23/2022: Southern Chanhassen and Lower Bluff Development Planning The meeting adjourned at 6:53 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 191 5.0 APPENDIX CITY OF CHANHASSEN FACILITIES MASTER PLAN STUDY ӏ 5.92May 23rd, 2022 END OF DOCUMENT 192 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Park Referendum Update (following regular meeting) File No.Item No: A.3 Agenda Section 5:00 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY Park & Rec Director Jerry Ruegemer will provide an update from the Referendum Task Force. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 193 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Future Work Session Schedule File No.Item No: A.4 Agenda Section 5:00 P.M. - WORK SESSION Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION N/A Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: June 27, 2022 1. Presentation and Review of 2021 Audit, Redpath and Company 2. Avienda Presentation 3. City Council Roundtable July 11, 2022 1. 2023 Preliminary Budget Financial Plan Discussion July 25, 2022 1. TBD 194 August 8, 2022 1. 2023 Budget Overview and Initial CIP Discussion September 12, 2022 1. Preliminary Levy Discussion October 24, 2022 1. General Fund & Property Supported Funds Discussion November 14, 2022 1. CIP, Debt & Utility Rate Study Discussion BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 pm on the second and fourth Monday of each month in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 195 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Announce New City of Chanhassen Website File No.Item No: C.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Prepared By Arianna Lyksett, Communications Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Announcement Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority Communications SUMMARY The City of Chanhassen launched a new and improved website on June 9 that will make it easier for residents to connect with the City. The redesigned website, ChanhassenMN.gov, features a new look, improved navigation, and mobile compatibility. This is a major item from our Strategic Plan. The City website is an essential communication tool for Chanhassen residents. Communication is one of our strategic priorities, and the City is committed to continuing to expand our website to be a hub of information for our community. Now, more than ever, our website must serve the needs of all residents, visitors, and business owners. This website’s primary focus is to provide an efficient, communicative tool for users by updating and providing new web features. The site is mobile-friendly, with an adjustable screen resolution to fit smartphones, tablets, laptops, and other devices. Updated Features 196 Calendar: The searchable calendar allows community members to quickly find City Council meetings, board and commission meetings, and Parks & Recreation events. Search: The improved search function makes it easier to navigate the website. Project Button: Users will be able to stay up to date on City projects by clicking on the “projects” button. Now projects are categorized by county, state, private, and local. I Want To: Residents will be able to apply, contact, dispose of, or find any service we offer with this new and improved tab. Photo Galleries & Videography: Find City photos and video recaps from different city events throughout the website. e-News: Sign-up to receive our weekly ChanHappenings e-newsletter, Message from the Mayor, or our Park and Recreation newsletter by signing up for e-News. SeeClickFix: Residents can report problems, such as potholes and damaged street signs, by using SeeClickFix online. This reporting tool allows residents to connect with the City effectively. FlashVote: The City wants to hear from you! Sign up for FlashVote - an online survey tool that gives residents a quick and easy way to share input with the City. Emergency Notices: Important notices will be posted to the website’s homepage in a drop-down emergency bar. As part of the change, the City is adopting a new URL. Please update your bookmarks after June 9 to our new URL: www.ChanhassenMN.gov. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION Communications Manager Ari Lyksett will walk through a brief demo of the new site. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 197 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Approve City Council Minutes dated May 23, 2022 File No.Item No: D.1 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the City Council Minutes dated May 23, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS May 23, 2022 City Council Work Session Minutes 198 May 23, 2022 City Council Meeting Minutes 199 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES MAY 23, 2022 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Schubert. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; Rick Rice, IT Manager; Ari Lyksett, Communications Manager; and Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk. PUBLIC PRESENT:None. PARK REFERENDUM TASK FORCE UPDATE City Manager Laurie Hokkanen and Park & Recreation Director Jerry Ruegemer provided an overview of the PowerPoint that was presented to the Referendum Task Force at their last meeting which reviewed financial impacts. Information was shared on how property tax dollars were distributed ($.20 of each dollar goes to the City), the 2022 tax amount on a $400,000 home with comparable cities, tax rates in larger cities, 2022 general fund budget expenditures, how park operating money is spent, assessed values, tax rate calculation, estimated impact of projected 2023 levy, breakdown of who pays Chanhassen taxes, Park and Recreation priorities, and estimated impact of a 20-year bond issue. Another approach would be a local option sales tax which needs to be authorized by the state legislature and then to put on a referendum by voters. The Task Force is putting together a package at a cost of about $40M. Ruegemer provided an update of what priorities the Task Force was considering. Top priorities were discussed as follows: Lake Ann Park Preserve completion Community Center including year round indoor/outdoor activities o Indoor Park o Indoor Walking Track o Additional Gym Space o Indoor Ice Area Bandimere Park Expansion including picnic shelter, restrooms, athletic lighting, sport court, artificial turf/multipurpose o Splash Pad o Sport Court o Picnic Shelter Nature Play 200 City Council Work Session Minutes – May 23, 2022 2 Covered Ice Rink Permanent Bathrooms at Community Parks Athletic Turf for Soccer Athletic Field Lighting for Soccer and Baseball Inclusive Playground Challenge Course Trail Gaps Councilman Campion asked for a definition of a “challenge course.” Hokkanen replied that a challenge course is defined as a series of activities, sometimes on or close to the ground (usually referred to as a low ropes course) and sometimes built on utility poles or trees, or in the rafters of a building (a high ropes course). It is comparable to a Ninja Warrior setup. Hokkanen added that the Task Force preferred to focus on upgrading Lake Ann and Bandimere Parks since they are the most popular parks in the City. Ruegemer also reported that the Task Force was considering improvements to the Rec Center, including an addition as outlined in the Facilities Study, one gym, expanded lockers and restrooms and a multipurpose room, include a walking track, covered outdoor ice or indoor ice, and athletic field lighting. The Task Force was also interested in completing trail gaps at various locations throughout the City. Hokkanen asked for feedback from the Council to give to the Task Force as the ballot language needs to be prepared by the end of June. Councilman Campion and Councilwoman Rehm asked for clarification of costs. Councilman McDonald would like to see the annual operating cost for the Rec Center which would be a part of the City’s annual budget. Hokkanen replied that the Task Force was also interested in that and the generic understanding is that if it is well managed, operating costs would break even with revenue. Councilwoman Schubert observed that operating costs would probably decrease if grass was replaced with turf. Mayor Ryan would like to incorporate other components in the Lake Ann Park Preserve project such as nature play or something unique that would draw visitors to the park. Hokkanen commented that nature play has been a popular topic of discussion with the Task Force. Councilwoman Rehm suggested adding a labyrinth. Councilwoman Schubert asked about lighting at Bandimere Park soccer fields adjacent to the houses on the north end of the park. Ruegemer responded that the new LED lighting available produces less spillage or light overflow and are much cheaper to operate. Councilwoman Rehm asked about incorporating a swing set component. Ruegemer responded that could be incorporated in the City Hall park area and in other areas of the park system as well. Councilwoman Rehm asked about the status of the skate park. Ruegemer said that the skate park will be determined once the Facilities Study is complete. Hokkanen said the Task Force brainstormed about what could be done about how we communicate it to the public. Mayor Ryan asked about timing of the final decision. Ruegemer stated at the next Task Force meeting they will drill down and categorize projects and uses and respond to the Council by the end of June or first part of July. Mayor Ryan thought a big component should be to communicate generational benefits. Ruegemer said the Task Force is aware of that and would like to offer something for everybody. Councilwoman Rehm also expressed concern about different generations and providing for all of their needs. She also asked how the Task Force came up with the $40M figure. Hokkanen said the Task Force considered fiscal responsibility and determined that they could justify this amount as opposed to higher amounts. All Task Force meetings are posted as open meetings and the public and Council are welcome to attend. 201 City Council Work Session Minutes – May 23, 2022 3 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) DISCUSSION Hokkanen reviewed the discussion from the last meeting about coming back to the City Council with a list and recommendations for them to sort through; however, there are so many open questions right now regarding long-term projects. Although she does have a list of projects with recommendations for ARPA funding, there needs to be a better understanding of what is going to happen with City Hall in the future before recommending making investments in City Hall or the fire stations, and a referendum is also likely to occur. Picking and choosing park projects to invest ARPA funds in at this time might not make as much sense and might make the referendum a harder sell to the public. Staff’s recommendation would be to not allocate all of the ARPA funds now and come back to the lists in November, and provide recommendations for projects. Proposed Public Works Projects for ARPA Funding Security fence and vehicular gate for the Public Works facility - $235,000 Forestry Management Plan – Emerald Ash Borer Management City Hall interim internal remodels - $240,000 Powers Lift Station (recommended project) City Engineer/Public Works Director Charles Howley presented a slide showing the location of the proposed Powers Lift Station which would allow for development. Existing sanitary sewer was already installed with the Highway 212 project but was not connected. Installation of the lift station would allow raw land to become immediately developable as well as provide sanitary sewer service to nearby large-lot subdivisions if and when they would need it (existing well and septic properties). The City could take it on as a capital project to construct it and then set up a sewer district for the future developments to pay into. Ultimately, development would pay for the cost of installation. Spending the money now will spur future development. We could also do it with assessments and defer the assessments. There are a number of ways to fund it. An easement or grant of property would be required to install the lift station. This project has been in the CIP for many years and has been accounted for in the City’s Utility Rate Study. The initial installation could be paid for with ARPA funds. Mayor Ryan asked about the future of sanitary sewer in the Highway 61 area. Howley commented that sanitary lines were installed with the TH 101 project but we would need to put a sewer line through the golf course property before the lines can be used. An easement would have to be provided by the golf course. The Highway 61 area cannot develop with sanitary sewer until the Powers Lift Station is complete. Councilwoman Schubert asked about other lift station service areas and who pays for them? Howley responded that typically if a lift station is required for a development, it is only needed for that development and the developer builds and pays for it. If the proposed lift station will serve areas beyond a specific development, the City will have to share the costs with the developer which the City will eventually get back. This is called oversizing. Councilman Campion questioned how we can be sure the golf course is planning to develop soon. Community Development Director Kate Aanenson responded that she and Howley met with the owners of the Moon Valley site located on Highway 61, and were told that the golf course would be amenable to installing a sewer line through their property in order for the Moon Valley site to get sewer service. Howley said a sewer line could be installed through the golf course by directional boring. Hokkanen stated that the golf course property is our next development area 202 City Council Work Session Minutes – May 23, 2022 4 following the TH 101 project and Avienda. Howley said it doesn’t hurt to ask the property owners if we can put a sewer line through the golf course. Hokkanen reviewed that moving forward with the lift station is our next step. Howley referenced the Comprehensive Plan and do we wait or be more proactive. Councilwoman Schubert asked if the City was aware of when Tim Erhart is planning to develop his property. Howley has not heard anything through Engineering. Aanenson added that Mr. Erhart requested a higher density for his property during the Comprehensive Plan process. Mayor Ryan asked if there was an opportunity to have a conversation with the golf course and move forward if they react positively. If not, she would rather the ARPA funds be spent elsewhere. Campion asked if there was any drawback to talking to the golf course? Aanenson said there have been conversations with the golf course in the past. Hokkanen reviewed Fire Department Projects including moving fire administration staff to Fire Station 1 which would create much-needed space at City Hall, replace a set of rescue tools, remodel the lower level training room, and replace Engine 21. Hokkanen also reviewed park and playground projects. Council had expressed interest in getting caught up with playground replacements. The City is not currently behind in playground replacements; however, it is a year-to-year decision on how to fund these improvements. The estimated playground life span is 25 years. Hokkanen asked the Council for direction on how to proceed with the ARPA funding. Councilwoman Schubert would like more information on discussions between Bluff Creek Golf Course and the City and what the Referendum Task Force comes up with. Mayor Ryan referenced an anonymous text from a resident with concerns that the economy is going to fail and that the City should reserve the ARPA funds to offset costs. Hokkanen stated the City cannot use ARPA funds to delay or offset a planned increase. Hokkanen cautioned the Council that this was one-time money. CITIZEN ACTION REQUEST RESPONSES Hokkanen reviewed the two citizen action requests from Paul Granos on behalf of the Lotus Lake Conservation Alliance (LLCA): Lotus Lake boat launch signage/pavement markings and goose management. Following Mr. Granos’ presentation of these requests at the May 9 City Council meeting, staff feels we could paint the boat launch area pavement at a fairly low cost but prefers not to add more signage due to maintenance costs. Councilman McDonald asked if the public would be able to determine distance on the lake after looking at the pavement markings on shore. Councilman Campion agreed with Councilman McDonald and suggested placing a couple of markers in the lake. Mayor Ryan asked about permission from the DNR about placing buoys. Assistant City Manager Matt Unmacht said the DNR does require permits. Councilwoman Rehm does not want signs but thought the markings might bring attention to the issue. Councilwoman Schubert is indifferent on the topic and doesn’t see an issue with placing the pavement markings and that we could try it this year and see how it goes. Councilwoman Rehm asked if other communities have done this. Hokkanen stated Mr. Granos did not provide any examples from other citties. Howley suggested that the pavement markings might not be noticeable due to the pavement length, or possibly adding a sign to the dock as a reference instead. Ruegemer expressed concerns about placing a sign on the edge of the dock as it may interfere with launching and docking. He suggested that if a sign is desired it should be placed on an existing sign post. Councilman McDonald sees this as hassling people who want to use the lake, that 203 City Council Work Session Minutes – May 23, 2022 5 restriction requests are never ending, and that adding signage and/or pavement markings could escalate the issues. The City should leave it to the DNR to impose these types of restrictions. Councilwoman Rehm asked if Communications could advertise on Social Media. Mayor Ryan is not hearing any complaints from other lakes in the City. Councilman Campion asked if there was any evidence that Lotus Lake is a wake surf destination. Mayor Ryan referenced that tracking was done on Lotus Lake in the past when AIS was an issue but not since then. City Council consensus was not to get involved. Regarding the request for goose management on Lotus Lake, Hokkanen said staff has assisted the LLCA in connecting with the DNR and that there are some changes that need to be made to the goose management plan before they can consider approving it. The City would also have to hold a public hearing and submit a resolution of support to the DNR. The City Council could hold a public hearing to adopt a resolution of support at the June 13 City Council meeting so that the LLCA can submit their plan and possibly implement it yet this year; however, the public hearing would be held on the basic idea and premise but without the final plan. If Council decides to wait for the final plan, the LLCA will not be able to implement the plan this year. Councilman McDonald asked if these plans exist in Eden Prairie or other cities. Hokkanen replied that the DNR changed their requirements and regulations and these requests are less prevalent now. Councilman Campion was in favor of either waiting for the final plan or doing nothing. Councilwoman Rehm is not in favor of the program. Councilman McDonald would be in favor of waiting for a final plan but prefers not to move forward. Overall, Council consensus is to see a plan before moving ahead with a public hearing. FUTURE WORK SESSION SCHEDULE 06/13/2022:Fire Department/Public Safety Staffing Update; Facilities Study Discussion 06/27/2022:City Council Roundtable; 2023 Preliminary Budget Financial Plan Discussion 08/08/2022:2023 Budget Overview and Initial CIP Discussion 09/12/2022:Preliminary Levy Discussion 10/24/2022:General Fund & Property Supported Funds Discussion 11/14/2022:CIP, Debt & Utility Rate Study Discussion The work session adjourned at 6:58 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 204 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, MAY 23, 2022 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman Campion, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilwoman Schubert, Councilman McDonald. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:None. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Matt Unmacht, Assistant City Manager; Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Charlie Howley, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Don Johnson, Fire Chief; Jerry Ruegemer, Park & Recreation Director; Priya Tandon, Recreation Coordinator; Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist; Ari Lyksett, Communications Manager; Lt. Lance Pearce, Carver County Sheriff’s Office; Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk; Andrea McDowell-Poehler, City Attorney; PUBLIC PRESENT: Sharon Pudwell 2237 Lake Lucy Road Stephen Kerkvliet 2201 Lake Lucy Road Gary Pudwell 2237 Lake Lucy Road Jason Dreher 2144 Lake Lucy Road Mayor Ryan asked the City Council if there were any modifications or additions to the agenda. After the roll call vote there were no changes to the published agenda. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Ryan noted the City of Chanhassen and American Legion Post 580 are proud to host the annual Memorial Day ceremony on Monday, May 30. She invited the public to join them as they honor those who gave their life for this great country. There will be cemetery services at Leech Cemetary at 7:30am, Pioneer Cemetery at 8:15am, and St. Hubert’s Cemetery at 10:15am. The ceremony will take place at City Center Park at Noon. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Schubert seconded that the City Council approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated May 9, 2022 2. Receive Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated April 19, 2022 205 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 2 3. Receive Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes dated April 13, 2022 4. Receive Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes dated April 12, 2022 5. Approve Claims Paid dated May 23, 2022 6. Approve Purchase of Replacement Traffic Signal Control Cabinet at West 78th Street and Kerber Boulevard 7. Approve Temporary Modification of the Licensed Premises to Serve On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor in Chanhassen Dinner Theatre's Parking Lot located at 501 West 78th Street for the 10th Anniversary Celebration of Brindisi's Pub to be held on June 20, 2022 8. Approve Advance Resignation Policy 9.Resolution 2022-49: Waiving Municipal Consent Process for MnDOT's 2023 TH 41 Resurfacing Project 10.Resolution 2022-50:Authorize Entering Into an Agreement and Easement with Oak Hill Homeowners Association for the Maintenance of Nicholas Way 11. Approve Permit for Fireworks Display at Lake Ann Park, July 4, 2022 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 1. Fire Department Update Chief Johnson gave an update noting they responded to 75 calls for service in April. He shared they did away with the day-only calls and switched to duty crew calls. Out of 18 general alarms, 15 came in on non-staff weekend hours. Fire response included an apartment fire in Excelsior, a commercial building fire in Excelsior, and an outside trash fire on the Avienda construction site. Total medical responses for the month were at 46 responses and on 26 of the calls the Fire Department arrived before the ambulance. On May 6 they had the annual Firefighter Banquet with Aaron Busch being named Firefighter of the Year. Chief Johnson noted he was contacted by Westwood Church requesting mass casualty response training. Ridgeview Medical assisted with wounds and makeup. During this training on Saturday morning there were about 180 people on site with 60-70 role players provided by church members, and 32-34 fire fighters as well as the Carver County Sherriff’s office, Chaska Police Department, Eden Prairie Police Department, and South Lake Minnetonka Police Department. It was an awesome opportunity for their young staff to work in an environment that they can control. 206 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 3 2. Law Enforcement Update Lieutenant Pearce shared a report on April activity for the Sherriff’s office noting they had 825 patrol calls for service including 54 A Offense, 19 B Offense, 59 non-criminal, and 393 traffic category events. In April they did a major target enforcement detail promoting safe driving and visibility and saw significantly more traffic stops for the month. It was also hands-free violation targeted month and in the City of Chanhassen they made 296 traffic stops, 72 citations, and 32 of those were hands-free violations, and five DUI arrests. Lieutenant Pearce shared about fraud, theft, and domestics which have been relatively consistent for the month with mental health calls down from 16 in March to 8 in April. He thanked Chief Johnson for leading the mass casualty incident at Westwood Church and also thanked surrounding law enforcement partners for sending people over for the training. The Community Outreach program for registering a surveillance camera with the Sherriff’s Office will be called Community Watch and will begin very soon. Beginning today the Towards Zero Death enforcement will be seatbelt restraint through June 5. Lieutenant Pearce shared they are partnering with Change the Outcome to do a community drug presentation about the opioid epidemic on Tuesday, June 21 at the Chanhassen Recreation Center from 6:30-8:30 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Resolution 2022-51: Accept the Bids and Award the Contract for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project #02-03; and Resolution 2022-52: Adopt the Assessment Roll Director of Public Works/City Engineer Howley gave a presentation on the item noting they are here tonight to hold the Assessment Hearing (public hearing) and consider accepting the bids for the project, award the contract, and adopt the final assessment roll. The project will be mill and overlay of .7 miles of street on Lake Lucy Road, the existing bituminous trail will have a full depth reclaim which will be ground up and repaved, spot curb and gutter replacement, minor utility repairs, repairing some deficient storm manholes, replace castings that do not meet current standards, as well as adding in three storm sewer catch basins. They also included a storm pond maintenance project as a bid alternate. Mr. Howley gave history on the project noting it was originally designed and bid in 2019-2020 with two open houses and public hearings with no formal assessment appeals received. The project was rescheduled due to the pandemic to align with the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2022. The City held an open house the previous week with five property owners at the meeting with questions about assessments on a collector road. Mr. Howley noted four bids came in and Valley Paving, who has done street projects for the City in the past, came in the lowest and Staff recommends going with their bid. Regarding budget, Mr. Howley stated the CIP has a total of $875,000 for the entire project and the City added $88,000 in Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA) funds. Lake Lucy Road is a collector roadway designed to move traffic through an area; therefore, the road is wider. Per the City’s assessment policy and to be fair, they normalize the road width, take a percentage of that, and use it to calculate the assessments. The property 207 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 4 owners are not charged for the full 36-foot width of the road but are charged for a pro-rated share of 31 feet. Because there aren’t as many residential homes on collector roads, the City also does an adjustment downward based on front footage of the actual lots versus the front footage of the entire street. He noted they also did not include the trail FDR work or the Texas underseal because it is a test case of a new sealing method. The final per-unit assessment rate is $3,816 which falls within the historical assessment range for mill and overlay projects of $2,000-$4,000. He shared about assessments on other collector roads within the City and shared more about the adjustments noting with adjustments the per-unit cost went from $9,205 to $3,816. Attorney McDowell-Poehler shared about the Assessment Appeal process, noting anyone who wants to object needs to file a written objection up until the end of the hearing with the City. Appeals then need to be filed within 30 days with the District Court. The Assessment Roll constitutes initial proof that the proposed assessment does not exceed the special benefit and it is up to the property owner to provide evidence that counteracts that determination. At that time the District Court can either affirm the assessment or send it back to the City for reassessment. If the appeal is not successful, the objector must pay back the City its costs. She shared about two St. Paul court cases regarding fees versus maintenance services and the court looked at those as fees or taxes and sent it back to the City for adjustment. Attorney McDowell-Poehler noted this situation in Chanhassen is completely different and it is completely allowed under Minnesota Statute 429 as a local improvement that benefits specific property and the City has determined there is a special benefit to those properties. She shared the St. Paul cases are not applicable in this situation. Mr. Howley stated if the project moves forward they will start construction in June or July 2022 with completion in September. Mayor Ryan opened the public hearing. Sharon Pudwell, 2237 Lake Lucy Road, is objecting to the assessments, noting they did not live there in 2020 when the feasibility study was happening. She would like to present the objections with signatures of all the 19 neighbors who have objected. She asked if there is a separate form they need to fill out or if this written objection is sufficient. Attorney McDowell-Poehler replied the written objection will be fine. Ms. Pudwell noted she and her husband signed a separate document that goes more into the distinction between taxes and fees and speaks to the question of the franchise fee. She would like the document to be considered as part of the objection. She feels that this road, being a municipal state aid road, is different than the City’s assessment policy. She noted the City’s assessment policy is not as clear cut and allows the Council and Mayor a lot of flexibility on how they impose those assessments. Ms. Pudwell does not see anything in the policy that says there is only a policy of assessing a property once and it is based on the driveway. She noted 20 people live on the road and she objects to doing any work that is not fully funded by the City when what is 208 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 5 being asked of the citizens is a tax. In her reading of the court cases, when there is a general improvement that benefits everyone in the City with no unique, special benefit to the properties being assessed, that is a tax. It does not mean the City cannot impose that tax but there is a higher standard in establishing that there is a special benefit to Ms. Pudwell that is different from anyone else. She stated the proof available and most commonly accepted by the courts is an appraisal to establish that the value of Ms. Pudwell’s property increased by the amount of the assessment. She has not seen the feasibility study and does not know if it is sufficient for evidentiary purposes to be considered an appraisal. Ms. Pudwell does not feel she will be getting $4,000 worth of benefit from the road project. Her preference is that the City look to an advance from the Municipal State Aid (MSA) fund or dip into the franchise fee, particularly if the City is funding 60% of the project from the MSA funds. As a taxpayer it seems to her that it is the State highway MSA fund and herself paying for the road; she does not see where it is coming out of the City’s general revenue or the franchise fee which she understands is collected to pay for road maintenance including mill and overlay. She would like to see the $76,000 proposed assessment be rejected and thinks it is unfair to have 19 families pay for this based on what the Department of Transportation says is 2,300 vehicles per day on average traveling the road. That would be asking 19 families to pay $4,000 for a road construction project that she does not feel is necessary on a road that at least 2,300 people per day drive across. Plus, there will be even more when the Lennar development is up and running and noted there is a lot of construction traffic right now. Second, regarding the City’s assessment policy there is a lot of flexibility and it recognizes various ways to calculate assessments and that the policy does not apply in all circumstances. The policy does not bind the City to any particular outcome and Ms. Pudwell suggests that for an MSA road that is exactly the type of situation they would depart from the policy and not impose the assessments on 19 property owners. She stated it is already a burden enough to have 2,300 people drive in front of their house every day, they should not have to pay $4,000 for that privilege. She told Mr. Bender at the public meeting that she guesses the nicer the road is, the higher the speed people will travel, as well. In looking at the assessment map there are at least five dead-end roads that dump into Lake Lucy Road and if all are benefitting from that road, then all of those people should be included in the assessment role and pay a share of it. Those people pull out on Lake Lucy and drive further than Ms. Pudwell does each day as they cannot get out of those dead-end roads without driving on the rehabilitation project being proposed. There are at least 150 houses that are getting a benefit without being assessed. She asked that the City find $76,000 in its tax base or a franchise fee to pay for the balance of this project. She is curious that if the City can pay its share of a $3,800 assessment with a pot of money funded by levies, MSA funds, or franchise fees, why are they not able to pay the $76,000. Ms. Pudwell genuinely means no disrespect to anyone in the room, if they want to raise her taxes and everyone in the City of Chanhassen for the $1.8 Million dollars they get in franchise fees. She noted she would be the first person there defending the City’s right to do that. However, doing this as an assessment is wrong and she thinks it jeopardizes the City’s ability to continue moving forward with the franchise fee program, as well. Stephen Kerkvliet, 2201 Lake Lucy Road, apologized if he did not do something correctly two years ago as he was informed there were no formal complaints. He did send an email to the City 209 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 6 with his disagreement at the time. He asked how often a home has the road done at between $2,000-4,000, noting with the increased traffic he suspects Lake Lucy Road will be done with a greater frequency. He has heard about a roundabout at the end of Lake Lucy which means there is recognition of increased traffic and wear and tear and would ask the City Council to consider that, as well. Gary Pudwell, 2237 Lake Lucy Road, would like to know where Mr. Howley gets his assessment authority from. When looking at Chapter 429 on this MSA road showing they are allowed to do that versus a City-wide tax because of the type of road that it is. With over 2,300 vehicles travelling that road he has a hard time understanding the justification that it is increasing the homeowner’s property value. Mr. Pudwell would like to see that formula and property value increase. He noted in Prior Lake he owned a house where the road was completely destroyed but the price of the house doubled and it had nothing to do with the road. Jason Dreher, 2144 Lake Lucy Road, has lived in his residence almost 20 years and has not really seen the road change and does not see a need for the road project. He was on Google maps earlier and noted there may be a couple more potholes but the crack in front of his house was there 12 years ago when the Google vehicle came through. Mr. Dreher is very concerned about increased speed on the road with any kind of improvement that does not introduce traffic calming and he does not see that in this project. In talking about Galpin Road being redone, that will certainly increase traffic a lot with wear and tear and heavy trucks. Mr. Dreher also does not seen an added value to his property, stating when he reroofs his house he does not get assessed, it is an improvement to his house but he does not get assessed for that. However, the City is going to impose a road project on him that he feels the road does not even need, without calming, speed reduction, or enhancement to his property value. He stated it is unbelievable in his eyes and many neighbors feel the same way. He noted if the plan was better he would pay more money for it but he will not pay more money for a road that will increase the speed without any benefit to his property. Mr. Pudwell noted earlier they looked at road projects the City has accomplished over the last 5- 7 years and, as alluded to earlier regarding the dead ends off Lake Lucy Road, on many of those projects the dead ends were included as part of the rehabilitation. He asked what is different about Lake Lucy Road when there are approximately 150 residences that must use the road as an entrance and an exit with no liability at all in this process. Ms. Pudwell followed up on the issue of value. Some of her clients do appraisal work for federal land acquisitions and she knows the federal appraisal standards do not add any value for an improved road. When the federal government acquires property they do not pay extra for the road, the only time they make an adjustment to the value of the property is if the road needs to be completely reconstructed and then it is a reduction in the value. She disputes that the City would be able to prove as it needs to that Ms. Pudwell is getting almost $4,000 worth of special benefit for the road project. Mr. Kerkvliet noted the Minnewashta Parkway comparison and stated it does not mean that project was done properly. He asks the Council to consider not just following what was done last time but to look at whether that is the right comparison to move forward with. 210 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 7 Mayor Ryan asked the City Attorney with the formal complaint and signatures if she needs to do anything. Attorney McDowell-Poehler replied the Mayor just needs to accept the objection as part of the City Council meeting. If the objecting parties want to move forward with their objection they would then need to file an assessment appeal in district court. Mayor Ryan closed the public hearing. Mr. Howley answered some of the questions brought up during public hearing. Speaking of the dead end roads, he thinks the answer is because Lake Lucy Road is an MSA road and these other cul-de-sacs are not. They built out the project just to do the MSA road, the other roads do not have MSA funding, they prepare the plan sets differently and it is out of ease to do an MSA road by itself. If this was a non-MSA road the City probably would have had some of these cul-de- sacs attached to it. Mr. Howley noted they tend to go after roads in areas that need the work to be done; the City will not rip up a road if it does not need it, although he does not know the index of the cul-de-sacs. Regarding what authority within Statue 429 the City is allowed, he will have to defer to the City Attorney. Attorney McDowell-Poehler read from Statute 429 saying, “Council of municipality shall have the power to make the following improvements: to acquire, open, and widen any street, and to improve the same by constructing, reconstructing, and maintaining sidewalks, pavements, gutters, curbs, and vehicle parking strips of any material or by grading, graveling, oiling, or otherwise improving the same, including the beautification thereof including storm sewers or other street drainage and connections from sewer, water, or similar mains to curb lines.” Ms. McDowell-Poehler noted that is recognized by courts as the authority for assessing for local improvements to the extent that there is a special benefit to the properties that abut it. Mr. Howley noted there was a question about the City Council having flexibility which is true. They have the flexibility to do whatever they want on these assessments, but the policy is there to guide their decision. As for patching and doing the road later, Mr. Howley would argue it would just cost more later so the assessment would be higher not only from the cost of doing business and inflation, but the repair may not be a mill and overlay at that point but may be an full depth reclamation (FDR) or reconstruction so they would pay more. Regarding the frequency of a $2,000-$4,00 assessment compared to other local streets, road sections are designed based on traffic, so in theory a collector road that has 3,000 cars per day, the road section would be built thicker and bigger than a normal road so it handles the traffic. In theory, the recurrence of an assessment, whether on a local or collector road, should be the same. Regarding the roundabout on Galpin and increasing traffic, he shared they are under Galpin design right now and are just now looking at what the options are. He noted with development in a City traffic volumes will go up on streets and could this road have 3,500 cars years from now? Yes. However it is a collector road and is designed for 3,000-6,000 cars per day. Regarding the road being 20 years old and has not changed so there is no need to redo it, Mr. Howley stated the road 211 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 8 has an Overall Condition Index (OCI), it has been evaluated and it needs a rehabilitation. The only maintenance done on this road is some pothole patching and some sealcoating and it has held up pretty well as the current project is probably 10 years overdue. Mayor Ryan asked Mr. Howley to explain the OCI and how they evaluate across the City, including a five year plan. Mr. Howley replied the City’s pavement management plan is based on reviewing and rating the pavements. They are called OCI (Overall Condition Index) or sometimes PCI (Pavement Condition Index). Citywide, they are broken into three zones: 1, 2, and 3. Every third year a consultant goes out and physically looks at, measures, and does a performance evaluation of that pavement. The data is then input into the pavement asset management cartograph and will now have a new OCI. OCIs are zero (dirt or gravel road) to 100 (brand new road) and an OCI less than 40 would probably be a full reconstruction or FDR. If the OCI was up in the 90s they would probably just need a sealcoat; 50-70 would probably be a mill and overlay. With any project the City goes through and looks at the last rating, does geotechnical evaluations, has the consultants review the road, and they come up with the best rehabilitation. The goal for the overall street network in the City is to have an OCI of 70 and every year they are doing projects to keep that average at 70. That is how they create the five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), how they budget it out, and have a plan for attacking these roadways which has been bolstered by the franchise fee. Regarding no traffic calming, the driver feedback signs, which are already in, are the first strategy on the road. The City has not done follow up yet to see how it is working and it is on the list as those signs collect traffic data. That was the new calming strategy, along with the pedestrian crossing and signage. He noted they are also going to have a parking lane on one side of the street and the visual white line is another mitigation strategy to reduce speeds. Regarding special benefit in the rules of Statute 429, Mr. Howley cannot say that there is direct correlation to a property value and he does not know if that is the special benefit test and would defer to the City Attorney on that. He clarified the formula for calculating the assessments is the cost and the assessment policy and how to equitably break them down across the City. Mayor Ryan asked about being assessed only once. Mr. Howley replied a person living in the City long enough may be assessed again. The point made about if one has driveway access off that road, it is written in the document and perhaps could be clearer. When they went through the policy in January the intent was to make that more clear. The intent is to specify the road one takes access off of, not a backyard or sideyard. Mayor Ryan asked about the suggestion to borrow against MSA. Mr. Howley replied the pot of money the Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds come from are the gas tax, vehicle registrations, and other things at the State level to collect money. The State puts it in a big pot and segregates it out to MnDOT, Counties, and Municipalities. The City has needs based on mileage within the City, how much of that mileage is MSA, and how much of that big 212 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 9 pot the City gets and then receives that every year for maintenance and rehabilitations of MSA eligible streets. That is why there are special plans for MSA streets as they must submit them to State Aid, meet standards, and it will be reviewed. The account fluctuates based on how many projects the City does. If they do four MSA roads in one year, more money would be expended than is in the account and they would have to advance or borrow from their future allotments to spend today. Mr. Howley clarified the City makes a plan based on the money coming in, what the MSA needs are, and then they look out 5-10 years to plan for the roads and spend that money judiciously. The City generally does not like to advance the MSA money. Mayor Ryan noted years ago the City borrowed against it and it put them in a challenging situation when projects came due. That is why the policy was changed to not borrow against the MSA funds. She asked about the 60% versus 40% and asked where that money is coming from. Mr. Howley replied the City’s road projects are funded by the Pavement Management Program (PMP) fund. The revenue for that fund comes from the franchise fee, a tax levy, and MSA dollars. The City’s policy for assessments is that the City will cover 60%, which is paid for by the PMP fund, and then 40% is assessed to the benefitting properties. Mayor Ryan noted the Council recognizes that the PMP is taxpayer dollars. They had two years of discussion around the franchise fee and there were a lot of residents who wanted it to just be added to the levy and the City should cover 100%. Conversely, a higher number of people who had been assessed and were paying those off said how unfair it would be to go away from the assessment process because the people who had paid would now be paying twice. After a challenging conversation over two years, the City made the final decision to keep the assessment practice and implement the franchise fee. She also noted during the pandemic the City recognized the uncertainties of Covid and people’s financial situations, and as a City Council they decided not to do any road projects in 2020. However, they cannot keep continuing to defer road projects because of the unknown regarding the economic stability of the City, County, State, and Nation. She knows it can be challenging and they hear all the time that the road is still in great shape, and that is why they have their engineers and consultants to do the evaluations. Councilman McDonald asked about Ms. Pudwell’s statement regarding something separate regarding the franchise fee; he needs to know more about what that is and how it impacts what the City Council is looking at doing tonight. City Manager Hokkanen replied the statement related to franchise fees was, “if City taxes or franchise fees are not otherwise available to offset the proposed $76,000 assessment and the City does not want to bond for it, I recommend tabling the project until tax revenue can fully cover the cost of the rehab. This is what our family has to do in our own budget. Asking 19 families to pay nearly $4,000 at this point in time is a financial burden that outweighs any perceived benefit from the road rehab project.” 213 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 10 Councilman Campion asked Mr. Howley if there are any MSA roads that they have not assessed the properties with frontage. Mr. Howley replied to his knowledge, no. A couple years ago Lake Drive East by McDonalds was assessed. The road is an MSA road but all of the properties are commercial properties and were assessed by an area rather than per unit. Minnewashta Parkway and Kerber Boulevard also had assessments. Councilman McDonald noted this has brought forward some interesting legal questions. However, right now the way the law and ordinances are put together, his hands are tied, and it has been alluded to that the City has been doing this for years. The general comments about not needing the street to be repaired are not new comments, it is a subjective decision that is made, the City has policies and processes in place, and this was debated quite a bit two years ago. He stated it is not the City Council’s job to interpret the law but to implement the law. Right now he feels it is very clear that he needs to support the project as he has not seen anything that would say exceptions need to be made. He also asked with the cul-de-sacs, are they asking to assess those properties twice? When the City goes onto their street to fix it they will ask for an assessment from them, as well. Councilman McDonald was one of the advocates for doing away with assessments as he feels they are somewhat unfair and he noted other communities where the City pays for everything. The City floated that balloon and it was shot down so quickly with people wanting their money back and how far back should they go…5 years, 10 years, 15 years? It is an impossible solution and the City could not refund all that money. He clarified it is not a viable solution. Mayor Ryan acknowledged the two residents that said they brought forward formal objections two years ago. She noted they were not formal, filed objections but the City did receive those emails and were familiar with the objections on this project. She appreciates Mr. and Mrs. Pudwell bringing forward their arguments the way they did this evening and the City may need to go back and make sure the assessment policy is clear, refined, and understandable. Mayor Ryan agrees with Councilman McDonald. She does think they need to make sure there is a concerted effort on speeds. Councilman Campion agrees with Councilman McDonald, noting the history of the assessments and that they could not find a better way to do it going forward. Councilman Campion moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council adopts a resolution accepting the bids and awarding the contract; and adopts a resolution adopting the assessment roll for the 2022 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 214 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 11 GENERAL BUSINESS 1. Adopt Chanhassen Public Tree Policy Environmental Resource Specialist Jill Sinclair gave a presentation on the public tree policy draft. She noted approximately 7,000 public trees in the inventory including 3,000 park trees and 4,000 street trees. The policy was created by City Staff from various departments to address issues and provide transparency for the public. She stated this could be a working document and in the future the City can establish tree planting goals or other issues they would like to address. Mayor Ryan spoke about tree trimming and asked if the City will do any communication with the policy for residents. Ms. Sinclair replied it would be published on the City website. Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilwoman Rehm seconded that the City Council adopts the Public Tree Policy. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 1. Approve Update to Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Management Plan Ms. Sinclair shared about the EAB Management Plan, noting the insect is an invasive insect first discovered in Detroit in 2002, most likely brought in on packaging from Asia. The insect kills all types of ash trees and the larva hatch within the tree and tunnel within the phloem tissue of the tree. In 2016 when the City first discussed a plan, the City’s closest infested tree was 10 miles down the road in Shakopee and now Chanhassen has infested trees within its borders. She showed photos on screen of a tree infested with EAB and one that was chemically treated, noting the treatment does work. The agreed-upon strategy for the plan is education, inspections, and best management practices including removal or chemical protection. Ms. Sinclair shared the components include a tree inventory, inspection/detection/monitoring, tree removals and planting, treatments, wood disposal, education and outreach, ordinance/policy, and licensing and permitting. She noted risk management practices include tree removal because the trees become very brittle within 8-12 months of death. Councilwoman Rehm asked regarding tree tags, will people be able to see when the tree was treated and what it was treated for. Ms. Sinclair replied in the affirmative, noting the first tags did not have the year but by the end of this year they will reflect that. Councilman McDonald asked what would happen if a City sent a letter about removal of a tree and the property owner refused, especially if they had 15 trees to take down at a significant expense. 215 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 12 Ms. Sinclair noted the City Code says they would be issued a citation and the fact remains it will remain a dangerous tree to have in one’s yard and ultimately the issue will resolve itself. Councilwoman Rehm asked if a neighbor has EAB, can she apply the treatment in hopes of preventing it on her own tree? Or do the bugs die and how soon would one need to apply it for the prevention. Ms. Sinclair replied the treatments only occur in the summer when the tree is leafed out and actively growing. One can treat any ash tree and it will kill all the EAB in that tree. It is recommended that trees with 30% or more damage in the canopy are not really worth treating. Killing the EAB will not make the tree look better as it is already damaged. Catching it early on with minor damage is encouraged to be treated. Ms. Sinclair noted if a neighbor has EAB you could be 99% confident that your tree has it also, even if you cannot see the damage. Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilwoman Rehm seconded that the City Council approves the updated Emerald Ash Borer Management Plan. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. 2. Minnetonka Middle School West Roundabout Update Mr. Howley gave a presentation on the item, noting the proposed improvement is a roundabout at the main entrance on Highway 41. The overall project costs approximately $2.8 million. He noted the City had a meeting with Staff at the school district who brought the question of the funding gap to a board study session and the superintendent reported back that they do not have support for the project. The funding still needs to be resolved and noted the City does receive complaints from impacted neighborhoods in the area being used as drop-off points. He asked the City Council for guidance on types of outreach strategies to keep the project afloat, gain traction, and gain support. He has a draft letter to the school board in the packet tonight and could also send the letter to other organizations to spread the word. He stated the unfunded portion of the project is about $400,000 and the State MnDOT grant of $1.5 million expires on June 30, 2025. He has been told verbally by MnDOT that this is a very supported project and they are likely to be successful again. If the City wants to align their MnDOT competitive grant from two years ago, next year would be the last cycle where those two funding sources would align for the project. Councilman Campion thinks that a simple simulation or model can show the district the situation right now and the traffic model changes with a roundabout. He noted a new superintendent will be starting soon and asked if they could revisit this then. Councilman McDonald asked why ISD 276 is not supportive of the project? 216 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 13 Mr. Howley shared they were told it is a small amount of time that the problem exists, perhaps 15 minutes in the morning and 15 in the afternoon. ISD 276 thinks that actively managing it with police directing traffic solves the problem and why would anyone spend $2.8 million to solve a problem that does not exist? The district acknowledges that parents are parking and dropping off in these neighborhoods but the response is that it is a public street and they can do it. Councilman McDonald asked how the roundabout solves the problem of parents parking on public streets? Mr. Howley stated the philosophy is that people are using the neighborhood streets because they do not want to go into the parking lot as they cannot get back out efficiently or safely. They do not want the hassle of the exiting queue. If the roundabout does what it is supposed to do in keeping everything moving in and out, those parents would go back to picking their kids up at the school. He noted the traffic study showed that it would mitigate the problem. Councilman McDonald thinks it benefits the safety of the school, kids, parents, and the neighborhood. Councilwoman Schubert asked if students are walking across private property to get to school off Lake Lucy Road. Mr. Howley stated there is a path that leads to the street. Councilwoman Schubert does not like spending more money but if they think it would be able to help, she thinks it is a big enough problem and does not want to lose out on State aid to fund it. Mayor Ryan thinks the letter is great. In terms of timing there is a challenge with the summer months and the group that initiated the project was the PTO President. With a new superintendent there is a lot to juggle right away and it may be a little risky to put that on him to overturn what was already discussed by Dr. Peterson. Mayor Ryan thinks there may be a better strategy to tackle this in the fall although it makes timelines tight. She does think it is worth pursuing but there needs to be some management within the parking lot, as well as help engineering the traffic flow. Councilwoman Rehm asked about having another meeting with the school district and MnDOT. Mr. Howley noted he could see a strategy of pausing and waiting until the fall, sending the letter with an invitation for a meeting, and perhaps splitting the cost of the simulation. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. 217 City Council Minutes – May 23, 2022 14 CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilwoman Rehm seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:36 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen City Clerk 218 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated April 26, 2022 File No.Item No: D.2 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Christine Lusian, Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Receives the Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated April 26, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Operational Excellence SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 219 April 26, 2022 Park & Recreation Commission Minutes 220 CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 26, 2022 Chairman Tsuchiya called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. OATHS OF OFFICE The Commissioners were lead in the Oath of Office. Chair Tsuchiya welcomed Dan Eidsmo who is filling Sandy Sweetser’s seat and welcomed Matt Kutz on his reappointment to a second term. MEMBERS PRESENT: Karl Tsuchiya, Dan Eidsmo, Jim Peck, Don Vasatka, Scott Fischer, Matt Kutz, and Heather Markert. MEMBERS ABSENT: Youth Commissioner Alex Jerdee. STAFF PRESENT: Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director; Priya Tandon, Recreation Supervisor; Mitchell Czech, Recreation Supervisor; Adam Beers, Park Superintendent. PUBLIC PRESENT: Beth Johnson, Chaska Chanhassen Hockey Association. 1. Nomination and Appointment of 2022/2023 Chair and Vice-Chair Commissioner Kutz moved, Commissioner Peck seconded, to nominate Mr. Tsuchiya for another term as Chairman. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. Commissioner Vasatka moved, Commissioner Fischer seconded to nominate Heather Markert as Vice Chairman. Commissioner Markert moved, Commissioner Kutz seconded to nominate Don Vasatka as Vice Chairman. After a voice vote, Commissioner Markert was nominated as Vice Chair with Commissioners Fischer, Eidsmo, Peck, and Vasatka voting for Commissioner Markert; Commissioners Kutz and Markert voted for Commissioner Vasatka. APPROVAL OF AGENDA. Mr. Ruegemer asked to add item 3 under General Business: Referendum Task Force Update 221 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – April 26, 2022 2 Commissioner Markert moved, Commissioner Vasatka seconded to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS. None. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. APPROVE PARK & RECREATION MINUTES DATED MARCH 22, 2022 Commissioner Kutz moved, Commissioner Peck seconded to approve the Minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission Meeting dated March 22, 2022 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. GENERAL BUSINESS. 1. Youth Association Presentation Mitchell Czech, Recreation Supervisor, introduced the Chaska Chanhassen Hockey Association (CCHA). Beth Johnson gave an update on Youth Hockey, noting the CCHA was established in 1978, they are a non-profit, and are 99% volunteer run. With just over 800 players the Association is one of the top 10 associations for volume in the State. There are 31 upper teams (4th -5th grade and up) with 25 lower teams including boys and girls, and they have strong community partners. Ms. Johnson noted about four years ago the Association tried to split but Minnesota Hockey would not allow it as at the time they felt it was not in their best interest. Now they are re-evaluating the splitting of associations as they are getting too big. Ms. Johnson stated that there a number of events that help drive business into the area. The annual Brick City Classic Tournament typically hosts around 40 teams from Minnesota, North Dakota, and 4-5 Canadian teams before COVID. There are also a number of district hockey games and a lower-level pond hockey tournament & end of season Hoopla. The amount of ice time used at various facilities was discussed, and CCHA is the largest purchaser of ice at both the Victoria Recreation Center and Chaska Community Center. Ms. Johnson noted that they rent space at the Velocity Mini Rink in Eden Prairie, and stated that mini rinks are great and efficient for younger players. Registration trends were discussed, and CCHA has maintained a steady growth over the last 10 years with an expectation for more growth as Carver County continues to grow. With this growth, she expressed the need for additional facilities and ice to accommodate. Potential for partnerships and sponsorships were discussed. 2. Approve Purchase, Park Equipment Replacement Schedule for Roundhouse Park and North Lotus Lake Park. Adam Beers, Park Superintendent gave a presentation. He noted remaining funds will be used to rehab North Lotus noting they came about $15,000 over as lumber prices are still astronomical. 222 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – April 26, 2022 3 For example, in 2020 it was about $50,000 for materials and now it is over $100,000. The budgets have not adjusted entirely to the increase but they are able to utilize some of the leftover funds from the previous year. Commissioner Eidsmo noted he was looking at a bid earlier and it had a big allowance because of the lumber prices and asked if that is what was driving it up. Mr. Beers replied in the affirmative. He stated he tried to break out some of the removals so if numbers did not come in as anticipated, Staff would try to bridge that gap a bit. Chair Tsuchiya asked if Staff is able to do much of that work. Mr. Beers replied Staff is going to assist with about three weeks of work and they would still have to take it all away, haul away the bituminous, and have the company come in and do all the grading. It did not make sense investment-wise for all the things Staff would not be doing in trying to tackle that project to save $19,000. That is why they were able to utilize some of the money from the previous year. Commissioner Kutz moved, Commissioner Markert seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends the City Council award quotes to DMJ Asphalt for $69,607.60, Northland Recreation for $60,000, and Becker Area Products for $114,519 for the equipment replacement at Roundhouse Park and North Lotus Lake Park. Funds for the project are included in the 2022 Capital Improvements Program. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. 3. Referendum Task Force Update Mr. Ruegemer updated the Commissioners, noting the third meeting of the task force will be on Monday, May 2, 2022. There is a facilitating team from WSB who have been extremely helpful in setting expectations and goals. They are building the framework and foundation to build a high-functioning task force as it could be up to 20+ people with youth association representatives, elected officials, appointees from Commissions, and at-large members. Normally there are 12-16 people in attendance and those who attend are very actively participating and engaged. They have discussed referendum history and are looking forward in how to develop ballot language and how to get things to the finish line. Mr. Ruegemer shared other discussions of the task force including facilities and conditions of facilities within the City, infrastructure, heating/cooling systems, building technologies, and current/future staffing needs within City facilities. He spoke about a survey from 2017 on what the community would like to see within the City. Chair Tsuchiya noted Chanhassen’s taxes compared to other cities are quite a bit lower. REPORTS. 1. Easter Egg Candy Hunt Evaluation 223 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – April 26, 2022 4 Priya Tandon, Recreation Coordinator, gave an update, noting the 39th annual Easter Egg Candy Hunt was held on Saturday, April 16th, at 9am at City Center Park. Over 1,600 people (828 children) attended the event this year. The previous high-attendance was 471children in 2019. Adjustments were made as pre-registrations came in the week prior including purchasing additional supplies, candy, recruiting additional volunteers, expanding the candy hunt area, and check-in stations to accommodate the kids and families. Ms. Tandon noted they also utilized the Square system technology for card-reading to process day-of registrations with debit and credit cards. They anticipate being able to use the Square technology for future events to create easier day-of registrations. Ms. Tandon gave special thanks to sponsors including Culver’s, kiddywampus, and a variety of other restaurants and businesses within Chanhassen, Ms. Tandon noted the Chanhassen Fire Department was a huge help in terms of volunteers, and the Chanhassen Key Club sent many volunteers, as well. Paired with the candy hunt was the coloring contest. A total of 114 entries were submitted this year. Ms. Tandon noted the expense report is attached, as well as recommendations for 2023. Chair Tsuchiya asked if there is a way to tell what percentage of attendees were from within the community versus outside the community. Ms. Tandon replied they could find that out. Based on scrolling through the registrants, there were quite a few from outside the community. She thought it was approximately 50/50. Commissioner Markert saw at 9:25 a.m. people were already done and leaving. She wonders how they can incorporate ways to expand the event to keep people within the community longer, such as a pancake breakfast or Farmer’s Market vendors. Commissioner Kutz likes the idea of a coffee/doughnut truck, as well. He noted the problem is parking. The Commissioners discussed parking options within the City, encouraging business sponsorships, and coordinating with the Lion’s to do cross-advertising. Ms. Tandon replied the event definitely has room for expansion and they receive comments from people asking what else they can do. Staff welcomes ideas and can look at ways to expand. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS. None. COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS. Commissioner Vasatka noted Arbor Day is Saturday, May 7, 2022 and they will gather at Curry Farms Park to plant trees this year. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. ADJOURNMENT. 224 Park and Recreation Commission Minutes – April 26, 2022 5 Commissioner Markert moved, Commissioner Kutz seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:24 p.m. Submitted by Jerry Ruegemer Park and Recreation Director 225 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Receive Senior Commission minutes dated April 15, 2022 File No.Item No: D.3 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council receives the Senior Commission minutes dated April 15, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Senior Commission Minutes dated April 15, 2022 226 1 CHANHASSEN SENIOR COMMISSION MINUTES April 15, 2022 MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry Cerchia, Bhakti Modi, Ruth Lunde, Dorina Tipton, Linda Haight, Jim Camarata, Susan Kibler, Kara Cassidy. MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Mary Blazanin. GUESTS PRESENT: Dawn Plumer, Linnéa Fonnest. OATH OF OFFICE: The Senior Commission took the Oath of Office. Jean Steckling notarized signatures of all commissioners. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Commissioner Camarata moved to approve the Agenda. Commissioner Haight seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. SENIOR COMMISSION MINUTES: Commissioner Lunde moved to approve the minutes. Commissioner Tipton seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Commissioner Camarata nominated Chairman Cerchia as Chair. Commissioner Kibler seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Commissioner Tipton nominated Commissioner Lunde for Vice Chair; Chairman Cerchia seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. APPROVAL OF BY-LAWS: Commissioner Tipton made a motion to approve the By-Laws, Commissioner Camarata seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY BOARD REPRESENTATIVE: Chairman Cerchia appointed Commissioner Haight as the Advisory Board Representative. He also thanked Commissioner Kibler for her service on the board last year.. 4TH OF JULY BINGO EVENT: The Senior Commission is continuing to contact businesses within the community and request gifts for the 4th of July Bingo event. . ACT ON ALZHIEMER’S UPDATE-JULY 3RD PROMOTIONAL TABLE: Staff reserved a table. Commissioner Tipton volunteered to order additional handout materials. Commissioners will be needed to staff the table on the day of the event. 227 Chanhassen Senior Commission Minutes – April 15, 2022 2 ADOPTION OF ONBOARDING DOCUMENT: Chairman Cerchia provided overview on what is expected of the commission. The Commission accepted the document as presented. 2022 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: Commissioner Modi moved to approve the goals, Commissioner Cassidy seconded the motions. All voted in favor. ARBOR DAY: The Environmental Commission issued an invitation to the Senior Commission to attend the Arbor day event at Curry Farms Park on Saturday, May 7. MEMORIAL DAY-MONDAY, MAY 31, 2021 The Commission will participate by raising funds for Veterans Court. Staff is finalizing the posters and getting updated numbers on participants. ADOPT A SENIOR: Commissioner Tipton stated that multiple organizations are working independently. Some have stalled and now, Unite Us will bring them back together. This will be an ongoing effort trying to include all service providers. Volunteers for services are needed. SENIOR COMMISSION COMMENTS: Dawn Plumer provided the following: April Vaccine Clinic Schedule – New Time! Public Health is still here. Our dates, times and location for the April COVID-19 vaccine clinics are ready to serve people 5+ who want to receive first or second dose, 1st boosters (age 12+), or 2nd booster (age 50+, 4 months since 1st booster). Carver County employees and their families are welcome. All clinics are held at Township Hall at the Government Center in Chaska from 4-6 p.m. April 19: https://prepmod.health.state.mn.us/appointment/en/reg/1560724901 April 26: https://prepmod.health.state.mn.us/appointment/en/reg/1560724901 Public Health prefers pre-registration for these clinics, but walk-ins are allowed, dependent on staffing levels for each clinic. Please call Public Health at (952) 361-1559 with any questions, visit www.co.carver.mn.us/covid19vaccine to register for these clinics or find more information on the vaccines. Residents living in the Cities of Chaska, Chanhassen, Carver and Victoria that need transportation to and from the Government Center for vaccine appointments can use SouthWest Transit's Prime service for free. Call (952) 797-7463 to book a ride or visit www.swprime.org. Public Health continues to serve residents with barriers to receiving the vaccine in a more traditional clinic setting through our strike teams. Please call (952) 361-1559 or email Public Health at public-health@co.carver.mn.us to arrange for a strike team to visit your community, neighborhood, apartment building or home. 228 Chanhassen Senior Commission Minutes – April 15, 2022 3 Dawn also stated that when the commission starts work on Transportation and Mobility strategic area #2 around accessibility, that the SHIP grant does provide active living funds. She offered to set up a meeting with Patrick Stieg to see if any of the ideas can by funded. Linnéa Fonnest informed the commission that the Library is offering a three part series under the Generations category. Show Me Something For example, teens could show seniors how to use technology to create art, explain the appeal of manga/anime/cosplay, and more of what people 55-95 might be curious about. Seniors could show teens how to make a positive first impression, non-tech games and hobbies, and more. It’s up to you. Each person who signs up to Show Something will have a table for demonstrations Tell Me Something Pairs of older adults (age 55+) and pairs of teens (ages 12-18) can sit together and chat using a set of basic instructions and conversation starter cards. Every 10 minutes, a librarian will signal the teens to move to another pair of seated seniors for a new conversation. Each person who participates in at least 6 conversations will receive a certificate for Community Engagement Hours. Held outside on the plaza between the Chanhassen Library and the Senior Center or inside the Senior Center in case of severe weather. Presented in partnership with the Chanhassen Senior Center and funded by the Friends of the Chanhassen Library. ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Cerchia called for meeting adjournment. Commissioner Camarata move to adjourn; Commissioner Cassidy seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Prepared and submitted by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner 229 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Approve Claims Paid dated June 13, 2022 File No.Item No: D.4 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Danielle Washburn, Assistant Finance Director Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council Approves Claims Paid dated June 13, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Financial Sustainability SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION The following claims are submitted for review and approval on June 13, 2022: Check Numbers Amounts 177491 - 177589 $294,794.15 ACH Payments $1,141,726.16 Total All Claims $1,436,520.31 230 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH 231 Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 6/7/2022 8:03 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 05/19/2022 0.00 245.44177491 BCATRA BCA 05/19/2022 0.00 150.00177492 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 05/19/2022 0.00 1,703.61177493 Enterpr Enterprise FM Trust 05/19/2022 0.00 1,374.11177494 HeaPar HealthPartners, Inc.05/19/2022 0.00 81,750.67177495 IndSig Indigo Signs 05/19/2022 0.00 102.15177496 Lennar Lennar 05/19/2022 0.00 106,180.00177497 ROHWJAME JAMES ROHWER 05/19/2022 0.00 50.00177498 SoluBarb Barb Solum 05/19/2022 0.00 100.00177499 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 05/19/2022 0.00 2,096.79177500 UniLab United Laboratories 05/19/2022 0.00 316.79177501 ZbiMar Marcus Zbinden 05/19/2022 0.00 50.00177502 Alliance Alliance Parts Truck and Trailer 05/26/2022 0.00 232.82177503 AMEPUM American Pump Company 05/26/2022 0.00 199.60177504 ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 05/26/2022 0.00 159.11177505 BCATRA BCA 05/26/2022 0.00 120.00177506 BCATRA BCA 05/26/2022 0.00 33.25177507 CarTur Carburetion and Turbo Systems, Inc.05/26/2022 0.00 150.00177508 CenLin CenturyLink 05/26/2022 0.00 59.36177509 ChaCud Charles Cudd Company 05/26/2022 0.00 750.00177510 CHAPET CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 05/26/2022 0.00 82.50177511 COMASP Commercial Asphalt Co 05/26/2022 0.00 1,056.15177512 ISD112 COMMUNITY EDUCATION ISD 112 05/26/2022 0.00 2,356.00177513 CorCus Cortland Custom Homes 05/26/2022 0.00 250.00177514 CzeMit Mitchell Czech 05/26/2022 0.00 200.00177515 DecBaseC Deck and Basement Co 05/26/2022 0.00 500.00177516 DECKBASE Deck and Basement Co 05/26/2022 0.00 500.00177517 EastDan Dan Eastman 05/26/2022 0.00 98.00177518 EGRWIN EGRESS WINDOW GUY AND MORE 05/26/2022 0.00 250.00177519 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 05/26/2022 0.00 144.62177520 FehBri Brian Fehrenbach 05/26/2022 0.00 179.95177521 FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 05/26/2022 0.00 26.18177522 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 05/26/2022 0.00 12,862.23177523 FirHosD FireHoseDirect 05/26/2022 0.00 1,181.80177524 FIRSYS First Systems Technology, Inc.05/26/2022 0.00 495.00177525 FlePri FleetPride, Inc.05/26/2022 0.00 538.26177526 GRABAR GRAYBAR 05/26/2022 0.00 805.35177527 GRELAK GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC05/26/2022 0.00 767.49177528 GYMWOR GYM WORKS INC 05/26/2022 0.00 182.50177529 hach Hach Company 05/26/2022 0.00 920.64177530 HERLAN HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 05/26/2022 0.00 264.00177531 IroRiv Iron River Construction 05/26/2022 0.00 250.00177532 K2Ele K2 Electrical Services Inc 05/26/2022 0.00 1,605.00177533 KloMat Matthew Klosowski 05/26/2022 0.00 1,400.00177534 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 05/26/2022 0.00 850.00177535 LawPro Lawson Products, Inc.05/26/2022 0.00 371.97177536 Lennar Lennar 05/26/2022 0.00 4,500.00177537 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/7/2022 8:03 AM) 232 Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount LusChr Christine Lusian 05/26/2022 0.00 101.78177538 MINROA Minnesota Roadways Co 05/26/2022 0.00 311.60177539 MCMA MN CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSOC.05/26/2022 0.00 211.20177540 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 05/26/2022 0.00 20,693.00177541 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 05/26/2022 0.00 23.00177542 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 05/26/2022 0.00 744.03177543 NorCar Carrie North 05/26/2022 0.00 250.00177544 PheRun Pheasant Run Construction 05/26/2022 0.00 250.00177545 RAITRE RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 05/26/2022 0.00 948.00177546 RegUofM Regents of the University of MN 05/26/2022 0.00 75.00177547 ROAANI ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 05/26/2022 0.00 280.00177548 SagCur Curtis Sagstetter 05/26/2022 0.00 256.45177549 SCOTRE SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 05/26/2022 0.00 1,900.00177550 SHRNGO Shred-N-Go Inc 05/26/2022 0.00 2,200.00177551 SITLAN SiteOne Landscape Supply 05/26/2022 0.00 29.79177552 SnoKre Snow Kreilich Architects 05/26/2022 0.00 2,500.00177553 SOULOC SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 05/26/2022 0.00 738.00177554 StanCons Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.05/26/2022 0.00 74.50177555 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 05/26/2022 0.00 660.00177556 triedeea DeeAnn Triethart 05/26/2022 0.00 81.92177557 TWOTEA TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 05/26/2022 0.00 250.00177558 UniLab United Laboratories 05/26/2022 0.00 283.32177559 Vertex Vertex Unmanned Solutions, LLC 05/26/2022 0.00 516.00177560 VolDeb Debra Vold 05/26/2022 0.00 100.00177561 WicJoh John Wickenhauser 05/26/2022 0.00 21.46177562 POST POSTMASTER 05/31/2022 0.00 661.47177563 AANEKATE KATE AANENSON 06/02/2022 0.00 40.95177564 Alliance Alliance Parts Truck and Trailer 06/02/2022 0.00 5.50177565 ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 06/02/2022 0.00 490.84177566 BCATRA BCA 06/02/2022 0.00 60.00177567 BornKat Katie Bornbach 06/02/2022 0.00 50.00177568 CARAUT CAR-CO AUTO PARTS INC 06/02/2022 0.00 372.77177569 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 06/02/2022 0.00 1,845.20177570 CleSol Cleaning Solutions Services 06/02/2022 0.00 7,620.00177571 CUTABO CUT ABOVE INC 06/02/2022 0.00 3,000.00177572 EdgTit Edgewater Title Group 06/02/2022 0.00 161.83177573 EHLERS EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 06/02/2022 0.00 3,500.00177574 EPIEVE EPIC EVENT RENTAL 06/02/2022 0.00 1,284.96177575 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 06/02/2022 0.00 667.26177576 FlePri FleetPride, Inc.06/02/2022 0.00 843.75177577 GilKyl Kyle Gillen 06/02/2022 0.00 51.00177578 gonhom GONYEA HOMES 06/02/2022 0.00 1,500.00177579 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 06/02/2022 0.00 665.00177580 McNRic Rick McNutt 06/02/2022 0.00 72.00177581 MNSaf Minnesota Safety Council 06/02/2022 0.00 230.00177582 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 06/02/2022 0.00 112.00177583 OerArc Oertel Architects 06/02/2022 0.00 2,012.50177584 RMBENV RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 06/02/2022 0.00 104.00177585 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 06/02/2022 0.00 659.64177586 TheHart The Hartford 06/02/2022 0.00 1,541.01177587 TitlNex TitleNexus, LLC 06/02/2022 0.00 510.00177588 VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 06/02/2022 0.00 4,772.08177589 Report Total (99 checks): 294,794.15 0.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/7/2022 8:03 AM) 233 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 6/7/2022 8:04 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 05/19/2022 0.00 1,013.47 ACH AppEco Applied Ecological Services Inc 05/19/2022 0.00 2,903.00 ACH BOLMEN BOLTON & MENK INC 05/19/2022 0.00 490.00 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 05/19/2022 0.00 889.00 ACH DelDen Delta Dental 05/19/2022 0.00 4,400.55 ACH Avesis Fidelity Security Life 05/19/2022 0.00 296.38 ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 05/19/2022 0.00 1,050.00 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 05/19/2022 0.00 1,448.89 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 05/19/2022 0.00 146.25 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 05/19/2022 0.00 237.91 ACH OPG-3 OPG-3, Inc 05/19/2022 0.00 2,790.08 ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 05/19/2022 0.00 4.00 ACH TWISEE TWIN CITY SEED CO. 05/19/2022 0.00 405.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 05/19/2022 0.00 757.94 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 05/26/2022 0.00 39.78 ACH BOLMEN BOLTON & MENK INC 05/26/2022 0.00 5,387.00 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 05/26/2022 0.00 19,708.73 ACH carcou Carver County 05/26/2022 0.00 18,298.75 ACH PedrChri Christine Lea Pedretti 05/26/2022 0.00 619.45 ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 05/26/2022 0.00 67.80 ACH CONCUT CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC 05/26/2022 0.00 975.00 ACH DIAVOG Diamond Vogel, Inc. 05/26/2022 0.00 1,853.80 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 05/26/2022 0.00 3.92 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 05/26/2022 0.00 134.64 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 05/26/2022 0.00 2,425.55 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 05/26/2022 0.00 1,290.00 ACH KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 05/26/2022 0.00 2,440.25 ACH LYMLUM LYMAN LUMBER 05/26/2022 0.00 228.46 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergency Group 05/26/2022 0.00 496.94 ACH Marco Marco Inc 05/26/2022 0.00 735.00 ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 05/26/2022 0.00 9,840.60 ACH METFOR METROPOLITAN FORD 05/26/2022 0.00 13.84 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 05/26/2022 0.00 3,276.78 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 05/26/2022 0.00 112.87 ACH MOSBAR MOSS & BARNETT 05/26/2022 0.00 747.50 ACH NorAmerS North American Safety, Inc. 05/26/2022 0.00 147.60 ACH NYSPUB NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 05/26/2022 0.00 329.40 ACH RoaMac Road Machinery & Supplies 05/26/2022 0.00 47.37 ACH SafVeh Safety Vehicle Solutions 05/26/2022 0.00 1,550.00 ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 05/26/2022 0.00 183.03 ACH TWISEE TWIN CITY SEED CO. 05/26/2022 0.00 1,209.50 ACH VESSCO VESSCO INC 05/26/2022 0.00 1,853.00 ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 05/26/2022 0.00 1,674.45 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 05/26/2022 0.00 56.00 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 05/26/2022 0.00 1,048.50 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 05/26/2022 0.00 19,976.30 Page 1 of 2 234 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 05/26/2022 0.00 3,014.69 ACH AllTra All Traffic Solutions 06/02/2022 0.00 3,000.00 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 06/02/2022 0.00 254.08 ACH CarGra CarteGraph Systems 06/02/2022 0.00 400.00 ACH carcou Carver County 06/02/2022 0.00 955,315.00 ACH PedrChri Christine Lea Pedretti 06/02/2022 0.00 1,818.70 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 06/02/2022 0.00 9.00 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 06/02/2022 0.00 1.24 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 06/02/2022 0.00 70.00 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 06/02/2022 0.00 221.25 ACH BENSKAYE KAYE L BENSON 06/02/2022 0.00 588.00 ACH KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 06/02/2022 0.00 20,057.26 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 06/02/2022 0.00 13,298.74 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 06/02/2022 0.00 156.73 ACH PALMPAUL PAUL PALMER 06/02/2022 0.00 51.00 ACH IMPPOR Rent N Save Portable Services 06/02/2022 0.00 4,052.00 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 06/02/2022 0.00 1,863.00 ACH Thelen Thelen Inc 06/02/2022 0.00 280.99 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 06/02/2022 0.00 23,670.20 Report Total:0.00 1,141,726.16 Page 2 of 2 235 AP Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 6/7/2022 8:08:44 AM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description AANENSON KATE 101-1420-4370 40.95 6/2/2022 Mileage 40.95 6/2/2022 AANENSON KATE 40.95 Alliance Parts Truck and Trailer 101-1220-4140 232.82 5/26/2022 Supplies 232.82 5/26/2022 Alliance Parts Truck and Trailer 101-1320-4120 5.50 6/2/2022 Supplies 5.50 6/2/2022 Alliance Parts Truck and Trailer 238.32 ALLSTREAM 101-1160-4311 490.84 6/2/2022 Mitel Phone System Maintenance 490.84 6/2/2022 ALLSTREAM 490.84 American Pump Company 700-0000-4550 199.60 5/26/2022 Materials 199.60 5/26/2022 American Pump Company 199.60 ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 56.95 5/19/2022 Clothing AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 1 of 21 236 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 88.95 5/19/2022 Clothing ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 99.54 5/19/2022 Clothing 245.44 5/19/2022 ASPEN MILLS 101-1220-4240 159.11 5/26/2022 Clothing 159.11 5/26/2022 ASPEN MILLS 404.55 BCA 101-1120-4300 150.00 5/19/2022 Criminal Background Investigation 150.00 5/19/2022 BCA 101-1120-4300 120.00 5/26/2022 Criminal Background Investigation BCA 101-1220-4300 33.25 5/26/2022 Criminal Background Investigation 153.25 5/26/2022 BCA 101-1120-4300 60.00 6/2/2022 Criminal background Investigation 60.00 6/2/2022 BCA 363.25 Bornbach Katie 720-7202-4130 50.00 6/2/2022 Tree Rebate 50.00 6/2/2022 Bornbach Katie 50.00 Carburetion and Turbo Systems, Inc.700-0000-4120 75.00 5/26/2022 Supplies Carburetion and Turbo Systems, Inc.101-1320-4120 75.00 5/26/2022 Supplies 150.00 5/26/2022 Carburetion and Turbo Systems, Inc. 150.00 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 2 of 21 237 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description CAR-CO AUTO PARTS INC 101-1320-4120 372.77 6/2/2022 Supplies 372.77 6/2/2022 CAR-CO AUTO PARTS INC 372.77 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1220-4320 1,293.70 5/19/2022 Monthly Service CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1171-4320 86.84 5/19/2022 Monthly Service CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 101-1530-4320 323.07 5/19/2022 Monthly Service 1,703.61 5/19/2022 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,703.61 CenturyLink 700-7043-4310 59.36 5/26/2022 Monthly Service 59.36 5/26/2022 CENTURYLINK 101-1220-4324 33.04 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1160-4325 125.00 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4310 16.99 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 701-0000-4324 6.01 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1550-4324 30.04 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4324 6.01 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 700-7019-4310 212.14 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1160-4325 251.85 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1190-4324 123.88 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1170-4324 852.24 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 700-0000-4310 16.99 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1350-4324 30.04 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1540-4324 92.91 6/2/2022 Monthly Service CENTURYLINK 101-1370-4324 48.06 6/2/2022 Monthly Service 1,845.20 6/2/2022 CENTURYLINK 1,904.56 Charles Cudd Company 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/26/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02477 - 7401 Frontier Trail AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 3 of 21 238 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 750.00 5/26/2022 Charles Cudd Company 750.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 202-1192-4150 7.20 5/26/2022 Petty Cash Reimbursement CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 101-1370-4510 15.65 5/26/2022 Petty Cash Reimbursement CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 101-1190-4510 0.65 5/26/2022 Petty Cash Reimbursement CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 101-1540-4300 29.60 5/26/2022 Petty Cash Reimbursement CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 101-1120-4330 0.40 5/26/2022 Petty Cash Reimbursement CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 101-1170-4510 29.00 5/26/2022 Petty Cash Reimbursement 82.50 5/26/2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 82.50 Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1190-4350 3,780.00 6/2/2022 Cleaning Services - Library Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1170-4350 3,000.00 6/2/2022 Cleaning Services - City Hall Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1370-4350 480.00 6/2/2022 Cleaning Services - Public Works Cleaning Solutions Services 700-0000-4350 60.00 6/2/2022 Cleaning Services - Public Works Cleaning Solutions Services 101-1220-4350 240.00 6/2/2022 Cleaning Services - Fire Station #1 Cleaning Solutions Services 701-0000-4350 60.00 6/2/2022 Cleaning Services - Public Works 7,620.00 6/2/2022 Cleaning Solutions Services 7,620.00 Commercial Asphalt Co 420-0000-4150 1,056.15 5/26/2022 Materials 1,056.15 5/26/2022 Commercial Asphalt Co 1,056.15 COMMUNITY EDUCATION ISD 112 101-1534-4300 2,356.00 5/26/2022 Dance Recital 2,356.00 5/26/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 4 of 21 239 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description COMMUNITY EDUCATION ISD 112 2,356.00 Cortland Custom Homes 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-04534 - 6391 Near Mountain Blvd 250.00 5/26/2022 Cortland Custom Homes 250.00 CUT ABOVE INC 720-7202-4300 3,000.00 6/2/2022 Tree Removal 3,000.00 6/2/2022 CUT ABOVE INC 3,000.00 Czech Mitchell 101-0000-1027 200.00 5/26/2022 Start Up Money - Lake Ann Concession 200.00 5/26/2022 Czech Mitchell 200.00 Deck and Basement Co 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2022-00155 - 7145 Purple Parkway Deck and Basement Co 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2022-00135 - 1976 Paisley Path Deck and Basement Co 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2022-00519 - 2129 Paisley Path Deck and Basement Co 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2022-00452 - 7181 Purple Parkway 1,000.00 5/26/2022 Deck and Basement Co 1,000.00 Eastman Dan 101-1220-4370 98.00 5/26/2022 EMT Application Fee 98.00 5/26/2022 Eastman Dan 98.00 Edgewater Title Group 720-0000-2020 5.59 6/2/2022 Refund check Edgewater Title Group 701-0000-2020 70.76 6/2/2022 Refund check AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 5 of 21 240 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Edgewater Title Group 720-0000-2020 35.90 6/2/2022 Refund check Edgewater Title Group 700-0000-2020 4.64 6/2/2022 Refund check Edgewater Title Group 700-0000-2020 4.78 6/2/2022 Refund check Edgewater Title Group 700-0000-2020 32.84 6/2/2022 Refund check Edgewater Title Group 701-0000-2020 6.58 6/2/2022 Refund check Edgewater Title Group 700-0000-2020 0.74 6/2/2022 Refund check 161.83 6/2/2022 Edgewater Title Group 161.83 EGRESS WINDOW GUY AND MORE 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-06075 - 2091 Melody Hill Road 250.00 5/26/2022 EGRESS WINDOW GUY AND MORE 250.00 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7054-4309 3,000.00 6/2/2022 Arbitrage Report EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 700-7040-4309 500.00 6/2/2022 Arbitrage Report - Go Water Revenue 3,500.00 6/2/2022 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 3,500.00 Enterprise FM Trust 770-1376-4412 1,374.11 5/19/2022 Vehicle Lease 1,374.11 5/19/2022 Enterprise FM Trust 1,374.11 EPIC EVENT RENTAL 101-1600-4300 1,284.96 6/2/2022 Rental 1,284.96 6/2/2022 EPIC EVENT RENTAL 1,284.96 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1550-4140 144.62 5/26/2022 Supplies AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 6 of 21 241 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 144.62 5/26/2022 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1310-4120 256.78 6/2/2022 Supplies FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1550-4140 283.17 6/2/2022 Supplies FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 101-1550-4140 127.31 6/2/2022 Supplies 667.26 6/2/2022 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 811.88 Fehrenbach Brian 101-1250-4240 179.95 5/26/2022 Safety Boots 179.95 5/26/2022 Fehrenbach Brian 179.95 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 101-1550-4510 26.18 5/26/2022 Materials 26.18 5/26/2022 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 26.18 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 16.82 5/26/2022 Materials Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 45.92 5/26/2022 Materials Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4150 350.34 5/26/2022 Materials Ferguson Waterworks #2518 701-1384-4556 5,960.25 5/26/2022 Meters Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-1384-4556 5,960.25 5/26/2022 Meters Ferguson Waterworks #2518 700-0000-4550 528.65 5/26/2022 Materials 12,862.23 5/26/2022 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 12,862.23 FireHoseDirect 700-0000-4550 1,181.80 5/26/2022 Supplies 1,181.80 5/26/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 7 of 21 242 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description FireHoseDirect 1,181.80 First Systems Technology, Inc.701-0000-4551 495.00 5/26/2022 Maintenance 495.00 5/26/2022 First Systems Technology, Inc. 495.00 FleetPride, Inc.101-1320-4140 538.26 5/26/2022 Supplies 538.26 5/26/2022 FleetPride, Inc.101-1320-4140 322.83 6/2/2022 Supplies FleetPride, Inc.101-1220-4140 409.40 6/2/2022 Supplies FleetPride, Inc.101-1220-4140 111.52 6/2/2022 Supplies 843.75 6/2/2022 FleetPride, Inc. 1,382.01 Gillen Kyle 101-1766-4300 51.00 6/2/2022 Softball Umpire 51.00 6/2/2022 Gillen Kyle 51.00 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2075 750.00 6/2/2022 Landscape escrow - 9280 Eagle Ridge Road - Permit 2021-00024 GONYEA HOMES 101-0000-2075 750.00 6/2/2022 Landscape escrow - 6950 Lucy Ridge Lane - Permit 2021-00026 1,500.00 6/2/2022 GONYEA HOMES 1,500.00 GRAYBAR 101-1350-4120 156.00 5/26/2022 Supplies GRAYBAR 101-1350-4120 649.35 5/26/2022 Supplies 805.35 5/26/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 8 of 21 243 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description GRAYBAR 805.35 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 101-1540-4130 767.49 5/26/2022 Supplies 767.49 5/26/2022 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 767.49 GYM WORKS INC 101-1530-4530 182.50 5/26/2022 Service on gym equipment 182.50 5/26/2022 GYM WORKS INC 182.50 Hach Company 700-7043-4160 920.64 5/26/2022 Chemicals 920.64 5/26/2022 Hach Company 920.64 HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 1,380.02 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,724.49 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.210-0000-2012 690.01 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 41,387.76 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 1,725.02 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 3,448.98 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.701-0000-2012 3,448.98 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.101-0000-2012 23,460.34 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.720-0000-2012 1,380.02 5/19/2022 June Insurance HealthPartners, Inc.700-0000-2012 3,105.05 5/19/2022 June Insurance 81,750.67 5/19/2022 HealthPartners, Inc. 81,750.67 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 101-1320-4150 132.00 5/26/2022 Materials HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 700-0000-4150 132.00 5/26/2022 Materials AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 9 of 21 244 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 264.00 5/26/2022 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 264.00 Indigo Signs 101-1220-4120 102.15 5/19/2022 Supplies 102.15 5/19/2022 Indigo Signs 102.15 Iron River Construction 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2022-00262 - 7550 Fawn Hill Road 250.00 5/26/2022 Iron River Construction 250.00 IUOE Local #49 701-0000-2004 36.76 6/2/2022 PR Batch 00402.06.2022 Local 49 dues IUOE Local #49 101-0000-2004 455.00 6/2/2022 PR Batch 00402.06.2022 Local 49 dues IUOE Local #49 700-0000-2004 173.24 6/2/2022 PR Batch 00402.06.2022 Local 49 dues 665.00 6/2/2022 IUOE Local #49 665.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 101-1550-4300 1,605.00 5/26/2022 Professional Services 1,605.00 5/26/2022 K2 Electrical Services Inc 1,605.00 Klosowski Matthew 720-7025-4706 1,400.00 5/26/2022 Tree Removal 1,400.00 5/26/2022 Klosowski Matthew 1,400.00 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 10 of 21 245 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Lano Equipment 101-1550-4120 850.00 5/26/2022 Supplies 850.00 5/26/2022 Lano Equipment 850.00 Lawson Products, Inc.700-0000-4120 78.92 5/26/2022 Supplies Lawson Products, Inc.101-1550-4120 78.93 5/26/2022 Supplies Lawson Products, Inc.101-1320-4120 78.92 5/26/2022 Supplies Lawson Products, Inc.101-1220-4120 78.92 5/26/2022 Supplies Lawson Products, Inc.700-0000-4120 56.28 5/26/2022 Supplies 371.97 5/26/2022 Lawson Products, Inc. 371.97 Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2021-00070 - 7323 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-04825- 7214 Alphabet Street Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,150.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03539 - 7346 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,850.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00264 - 7276 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,600.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03720 - 7254 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,700.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-04727 - 7311 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,750.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2019-03259 - 2166 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03734 - 1965 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03873 - 2078 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02016 - 2090 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00093 - 7322 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03722- 7209 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,120.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02358 - 7299 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,550.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00092 - 2153 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-00071 - 7221 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,150.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02633 - 7335 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2019-02768 - 2165 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03581 - 1989 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00090 - 1941 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00092 - 2153 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03787- 7241 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03537- 7242 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,700.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-00138 - 7277 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03539 - 7346 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,700.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02306 - 2042 Paisley Path AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 11 of 21 246 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2019-03314 - 7288 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00089 - 1940 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03514 - 7218 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,800.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-00070 - 7323 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-04510- 7220 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03717 - 1977 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,160.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00090 - 1941 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,600.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02619 - 2013 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00402 - 2054 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03514 - 7218 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03787 - 7241 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03525 - 7230 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-04499 - 7197 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02448 - 1988 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03722 - 7209 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2021-00071 - 7221 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00264 - 7276 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00196 - 7334 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,700.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03717 - 1977 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2021-04827 - 7311 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-04529 - 7289 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02168 - 2141 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,150.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00115 - 7264 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-04499- 7197 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,150.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02075 - 7300 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,750.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-01286 - 7288 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2019-03259 - 2166 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02358 - 7299 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,600.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02017 - 2001 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02017- 2001 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00094 - 1953 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03723- 7253 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2021-00138 - 7277 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02306 - 2042 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00631 - 2066 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02075 - 7300 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02619- 2013 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-04326- 7238 Alphabet Street Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2021-01210 - 7233 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,800.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00196 - 7334 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2021-00244 - 7232 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2021-00483 - 7245 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-04513- 7226 Alphabet Street AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 12 of 21 247 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02849 - 1952 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,600.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03873 - 2078 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,750.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00093 - 7322 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-04507- 7142 Alphabet Street Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,200.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02430 - 7347 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02633 - 7335 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,250.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00642 - 7252 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,700.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03581 - 1989 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02168 - 2141 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,600.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00402 - 2054 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-02430 - 7347 Paisley Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020 - 7264 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,600.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02016 - 2090 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03525- 7230 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,000.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-02849 - 1952 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,500.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03537 - 7242 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,350.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-00089 - 1940 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2073 2,200.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-03723 - 7253 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-03720- 7254 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2073 1,700.00 5/19/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2020-04510 - 7220 Pearl Drive Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/19/2022 Landscape Escrow - Permit 2020-00642 - 7252 Rogers Court 106,180.00 5/19/2022 Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/26/2022 Landscape - Permit 2019-03311 - 7278 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/26/2022 Landscape - Permit 2019-03313 - 2105 Paisley Path Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/26/2022 Landscape - Permit 2019-03295 - 7290 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/26/2022 Landscape - Permit 2019-03312 - 7266 Purple Parkway Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/26/2022 Landscape - Permit 2019-03237 - 7253 Rogers Court Lennar 101-0000-2075 750.00 5/26/2022 Landscape - Permit 2019-03238 - 7265 Rogers Court 4,500.00 5/26/2022 Lennar 110,680.00 Lusian Christine 101-1120-4370 101.78 5/26/2022 Mileage 101.78 5/26/2022 Lusian Christine 101.78 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 13 of 21 248 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description McNutt Rick 101-0000-2021 4.95 6/2/2022 boat rental late fee McNutt Rick 101-1540-3635 67.05 6/2/2022 boat rental late fee 72.00 6/2/2022 McNutt Rick 72.00 Minnesota Roadways Co 420-0000-4150 311.60 5/26/2022 Materials 311.60 5/26/2022 Minnesota Roadways Co 311.60 Minnesota Safety Council 101-1560-4300 230.00 6/2/2022 Defense driving class 230.00 6/2/2022 Minnesota Safety Council 230.00 MN CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSOC.101-1120-4370 211.20 5/26/2022 Membership - Laurie Hokkanen 211.20 5/26/2022 MN CITY/COUNTY MGMT ASSOC. 211.20 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 700-0000-4509 20,693.00 5/26/2022 Connection Fee MN DEPT OF HEALTH 700-0000-4370 23.00 5/26/2022 Renewal 20,716.00 5/26/2022 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 20,716.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 700-0000-2037 8.00 6/2/2022 PR Batch 00402.06.2022 NCPERS-Life Insurance MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 701-0000-2037 8.00 6/2/2022 PR Batch 00402.06.2022 NCPERS-Life Insurance MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 101-0000-2037 96.00 6/2/2022 PR Batch 00402.06.2022 NCPERS-Life Insurance 112.00 6/2/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 14 of 21 249 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 112.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 -190.44 5/26/2022 Supplies - Return MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 -59.85 5/26/2022 Supplies - Return MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 101-1550-4120 994.32 5/26/2022 Supplies 744.03 5/26/2022 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 744.03 North Carrie 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-05913 - 2446 W 64th Street 250.00 5/26/2022 North Carrie 250.00 Oertel Architects 402-1316-4702 2,012.50 6/2/2022 Chanhassen Fuel Island 2,012.50 6/2/2022 Oertel Architects 2,012.50 Pheasant Run Construction 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-04022 - 6670 Mohawk Dr 250.00 5/26/2022 Pheasant Run Construction 250.00 POSTMASTER 700-1130-4330 264.59 5/31/2022 May Utility Statements POSTMASTER 701-1130-4330 264.59 5/31/2022 May Utility Statements POSTMASTER 720-1130-4330 132.29 5/31/2022 May Utility Statements 661.47 5/31/2022 POSTMASTER 661.47 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 720-7202-4300 948.00 5/26/2022 Bluff Creek/Rec Center Apple Scab Spray AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 15 of 21 250 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 948.00 5/26/2022 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 948.00 Regents of the University of MN 101-1320-4370 75.00 5/26/2022 Conference Registration 75.00 5/26/2022 Regents of the University of MN 75.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 720-0000-4300 104.00 6/2/2022 Beach Monitoring 104.00 6/2/2022 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 104.00 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 101-1320-4350 280.00 5/26/2022 Waste Removal 280.00 5/26/2022 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 280.00 ROHWER JAMES 700-7204-4901 50.00 5/19/2022 Waterwise Rebate 50.00 5/19/2022 ROHWER JAMES 50.00 Sagstetter Curtis 101-1320-4140 104.13 5/26/2022 Fuel Sagstetter Curtis 101-1320-4370 145.54 5/26/2022 meals Sagstetter Curtis 101-1320-4370 6.78 5/26/2022 Meals 256.45 5/26/2022 Sagstetter Curtis 256.45 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 16 of 21 251 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 101-1220-4370 1,900.00 5/26/2022 Training 1,900.00 5/26/2022 SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 1,900.00 Shred-N-Go Inc 720-7201-4300 2,200.00 5/26/2022 Paper Shredding Event 2,200.00 5/26/2022 Shred-N-Go Inc 2,200.00 SiteOne Landscape Supply 701-0000-4551 29.79 5/26/2022 Materials 29.79 5/26/2022 SiteOne Landscape Supply 29.79 Snow Kreilich Architects 300-0000-4300 2,500.00 5/26/2022 Chanhassen Facilities study 2,500.00 5/26/2022 Snow Kreilich Architects 2,500.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 101-1160-4216 659.64 6/2/2022 Bluebeam Rev Std- Eng and Plan 659.64 6/2/2022 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 659.64 Solum Barb 720-7202-4130 100.00 5/19/2022 Tree Rebate 100.00 5/19/2022 Solum Barb 100.00 SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 101-1220-4510 738.00 5/26/2022 Services AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 17 of 21 252 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 738.00 5/26/2022 SOUTHWEST LOCK & KEY 738.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1420-4340 33.08 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1310-4340 147.00 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1310-4340 573.32 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1310-4340 176.40 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1420-4340 33.08 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1210-4340 29.40 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1110-4340 475.92 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1420-4340 33.08 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1310-4340 147.00 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1110-4340 40.43 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1600-4174 375.00 5/19/2022 Advertising Southwest Suburban Publishing 101-1420-4340 33.08 5/19/2022 Advertising 2,096.79 5/19/2022 Southwest Suburban Publishing 2,096.79 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.720-7025-4300 74.50 5/26/2022 Cranes Vineyard Design and Construction 74.50 5/26/2022 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 74.50 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 101-1350-4565 660.00 5/26/2022 Service Work 660.00 5/26/2022 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 660.00 The Hartford 210-0000-2015 19.20 6/2/2022 June LTD The Hartford 720-0000-2015 57.18 6/2/2022 June LTD The Hartford 701-0000-2015 69.44 6/2/2022 June LTD The Hartford 700-0000-2015 104.01 6/2/2022 June LTD The Hartford 101-0000-2015 1,291.18 6/2/2022 June LTD AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 18 of 21 253 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,541.01 6/2/2022 The Hartford 1,541.01 TitleNexus, LLC 101-0000-2033 510.00 6/2/2022 Special Assessment Refund - 7351 Minnewashta Parkway 510.00 6/2/2022 TitleNexus, LLC 510.00 Triethart DeeAnn 101-1170-4110 81.92 5/26/2022 Supplies 81.92 5/26/2022 Triethart DeeAnn 81.92 TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 101-0000-2073 250.00 5/26/2022 Erosion Control - Permit 2021-05323 - 6481 Bretton Way 250.00 5/26/2022 TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 250.00 United Laboratories 101-1550-4120 316.79 5/19/2022 Supplies 316.79 5/19/2022 United Laboratories 101-1550-4120 283.32 5/26/2022 Supplies 283.32 5/26/2022 United Laboratories 600.11 VERIZON WIRELESS 101-0000-2033 11.08 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1310-4310 238.29 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1370-4310 89.47 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1540-4310 40.01 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 462.86 6/2/2022 Monthly Service AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 19 of 21 254 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description VERIZON WIRELESS 701-0000-4310 125.10 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1220-4310 40.01 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1520-4310 51.97 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 125.10 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1160-4310 142.30 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1320-4310 320.73 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 720-0000-4310 443.56 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1120-4310 192.45 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1250-4310 368.69 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1600-4310 163.71 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1260-4310 76.22 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 700-0000-4310 607.57 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1530-4310 41.21 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 210-0000-4310 41.21 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1220-4310 616.17 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1110-4300 40.01 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1170-4310 46.21 6/2/2022 Monthly Service VERIZON WIRELESS 101-1550-4310 488.15 6/2/2022 Monthly Service 4,772.08 6/2/2022 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,772.08 Vertex Unmanned Solutions, LLC 101-1220-4370 516.00 5/26/2022 Training 516.00 5/26/2022 Vertex Unmanned Solutions, LLC 516.00 Vold Debra 700-7204-4901 100.00 5/26/2022 Waterwise rebate 100.00 5/26/2022 Vold Debra 100.00 Wickenhauser John 701-0000-4310 10.73 5/26/2022 Circuit Wickenhauser John 700-0000-4310 10.73 5/26/2022 Circuit 21.46 5/26/2022 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 20 of 21 255 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Wickenhauser John 21.46 Zbinden Marcus 720-7202-4130 50.00 5/19/2022 Tree Rebate 50.00 5/19/2022 Zbinden Marcus 50.00 294,794.15 AP - Check Detail-Checks (6/7/2022)Page 21 of 21 256 AP Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 6/7/2022 8:09:29 AM Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 101-1220-4530 1,013.47 5/19/2022 Equipment 1,013.47 5/19/2022 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 1,013.47 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1533-4300 146.25 5/19/2022 Personal Training 146.25 5/19/2022 Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1533-4300 146.25 6/2/2022 Training Sessions Al-Hilwani Juli 101-1539-4300 75.00 6/2/2022 Pickleball Lessons 221.25 6/2/2022 Al-Hilwani Juli 367.50 All Traffic Solutions 101-1310-4120 3,000.00 6/2/2022 Renewal 3,000.00 6/2/2022 All Traffic Solutions 3,000.00 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 101-0000-2008 39.78 5/26/2022 May 39.78 5/26/2022 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 1 of 13 257 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Applied Ecological Services Inc 720-7202-4300 2,466.00 5/19/2022 Hwy 61 Roundabout Management Applied Ecological Services Inc 720-7202-4300 437.00 5/19/2022 Hwy 61 Roundabout Management 2,903.00 5/19/2022 Applied Ecological Services Inc 2,903.00 BENSON KAYE L 101-1539-4300 588.00 6/2/2022 Fit for Life Instructor 588.00 6/2/2022 BENSON KAYE L 588.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 101-1310-4300 490.00 5/19/2022 Chan/Hwy 5 Trunk Watermain 490.00 5/19/2022 BOLTON & MENK INC 601-6048-4300 5,387.00 5/26/2022 Chanhassen/Crimson Bay Road Improvements 5,387.00 5/26/2022 BOLTON & MENK INC 5,877.00 Boyer Ford Trucks 101-1320-4140 254.08 6/2/2022 Supplies 254.08 6/2/2022 Boyer Ford Trucks 254.08 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 101-1140-4302 19,708.73 5/26/2022 Professional Fees 19,708.73 5/26/2022 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 19,708.73 CarteGraph Systems 101-1160-4231 400.00 6/2/2022 Cartegraph OMS Add on User Licenses (5) AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 2 of 13 258 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 400.00 6/2/2022 CarteGraph Systems 400.00 Carver County 101-1311-4234 13,475.58 5/26/2022 ESRI ELA 2020-2023 Year 3 of 3 Payment Carver County 101-1311-4503 1,291.67 5/26/2022 Pictometry Dataset, Year 3 of 3 Carver County 700-1384-4556 1,765.75 5/26/2022 Water meters Carver County 701-1384-4556 1,765.75 5/26/2022 Water meters 18,298.75 5/26/2022 Carver County 480-0000-4300 400.00 6/2/2022 Tax Charges: TIF Billings Carver County 101-1210-4505 61,525.50 6/2/2022 2022 Police Contract - Vehicle Carver County 700-1160-4326 650.00 6/2/2022 Carver Fiber -WWTP / W-3, 7, 8 /LS-24 Carver County 101-1160-4326 575.00 6/2/2022 CaverLink Internet Carver County 101-1210-4504 892,164.50 6/2/2022 2022 Police Contract - Personnel 955,315.00 6/2/2022 Carver County 973,613.75 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 101-0000-2008 37.20 5/26/2022 May Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 701-0000-2008 15.30 5/26/2022 May Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 700-0000-2008 15.30 5/26/2022 May 67.80 5/26/2022 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 67.80 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.760-1160-4307 525.00 5/19/2022 Office 365 Admin Training COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.760-1160-4211 364.00 5/19/2022 Office 365 Backup Service 889.00 5/19/2022 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.101-1160-4211 9.00 6/2/2022 Azure AD Premium P2 License 9.00 6/2/2022 AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 3 of 13 259 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 898.00 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC 101-1320-4120 325.00 5/26/2022 Supplies CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC 701-0000-4120 325.00 5/26/2022 Supplies CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC 700-0000-4120 325.00 5/26/2022 Supplies 975.00 5/26/2022 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC 975.00 Delta Dental 700-0000-2013 393.29 5/19/2022 June Dental Delta Dental 210-0000-2013 45.00 5/19/2022 June Dental Delta Dental 720-0000-2013 219.15 5/19/2022 June Dental Delta Dental 101-0000-2013 3,439.80 5/19/2022 June Dental Delta Dental 701-0000-2013 303.31 5/19/2022 June Dental 4,400.55 5/19/2022 Delta Dental 4,400.55 Diamond Vogel, Inc.420-0000-4150 1,853.80 5/26/2022 Materials 1,853.80 5/26/2022 Diamond Vogel, Inc. 1,853.80 FASTENAL COMPANY 101-1550-4120 3.92 5/26/2022 Supplies 3.92 5/26/2022 FASTENAL COMPANY 101-1320-4120 1.24 6/2/2022 Supplies 1.24 6/2/2022 FASTENAL COMPANY 5.16 Fidelity Security Life 701-0000-2007 5.63 5/19/2022 June Vision Fidelity Security Life 700-0000-2007 12.07 5/19/2022 June Vision AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 4 of 13 260 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description Fidelity Security Life 720-0000-2007 6.44 5/19/2022 June Vision Fidelity Security Life 101-0000-2007 272.24 5/19/2022 June Vision 296.38 5/19/2022 Fidelity Security Life 296.38 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 -180.00 6/2/2022 Credit HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 240.00 6/2/2022 Chemicals HAWKINS CHEMICAL 700-7043-4160 10.00 6/2/2022 Chemicals 70.00 6/2/2022 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 70.00 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 101-1110-4300 1,050.00 5/19/2022 Chanhassen Civic Campus 1,050.00 5/19/2022 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 1,050.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 8.16 5/26/2022 Supplies Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 8.82 5/26/2022 Supplies Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 13.69 5/26/2022 Supplies Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 17.52 5/26/2022 Supplies Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 10.16 5/26/2022 Supplies Innovative Office Solutions LLC 101-1170-4110 76.29 5/26/2022 Supplies 134.64 5/26/2022 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 134.64 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 201-0000-4705 1,375.62 5/19/2022 Equipment JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 101-1220-4142 73.27 5/19/2022 Equipment 1,448.89 5/19/2022 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 201-0000-4705 408.93 5/26/2022 Equipment JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 101-1220-4140 2,016.62 5/26/2022 Supplies AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 5 of 13 261 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 2,425.55 5/26/2022 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 3,874.44 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 700-0000-4550 1,290.00 5/26/2022 Materials 1,290.00 5/26/2022 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 1,290.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 101-1140-4302 2,440.25 5/26/2022 Legal Fees 2,440.25 5/26/2022 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 605-6502-4300 20,057.26 6/2/2022 Legal Services 20,057.26 6/2/2022 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 22,497.51 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 605-6503-4300 911.68 6/2/2022 TH 101 Reconstruction KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 101-1310-4300 4,290.00 6/2/2022 Metronet Support Services KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 605-6502-4300 8,097.06 6/2/2022 TH 101 Reconstruction 13,298.74 6/2/2022 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 13,298.74 LYMAN LUMBER 101-1550-4150 228.46 5/26/2022 Materials 228.46 5/26/2022 LYMAN LUMBER 228.46 Macqueen Emergency Group 101-1220-4120 496.94 5/26/2022 Supplies AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 6 of 13 262 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 496.94 5/26/2022 Macqueen Emergency Group 496.94 Marco Inc 760-1160-4411 735.00 5/26/2022 Lease Fee 735.00 5/26/2022 Marco Inc 735.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 701-0000-2023 9,940.00 5/26/2022 April SAC Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 101-1250-3816 -99.40 5/26/2022 April SAC 9,840.60 5/26/2022 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 9,840.60 METROPOLITAN FORD 101-1220-4140 13.84 5/26/2022 Supplies 13.84 5/26/2022 METROPOLITAN FORD 13.84 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-0000-2022 3,343.65 5/26/2022 April MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 101-1250-3818 -66.87 5/26/2022 April 3,276.78 5/26/2022 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 3,276.78 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 237.91 5/19/2022 Monthly Service 237.91 5/19/2022 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 112.87 5/26/2022 Monthly Service AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 7 of 13 263 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 112.87 5/26/2022 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 120.38 6/2/2022 Monthly Service MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 101-1350-4320 36.35 6/2/2022 Monthly Service 156.73 6/2/2022 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 507.51 MOSS & BARNETT 210-0000-1193 747.50 5/26/2022 Professional Fees 747.50 5/26/2022 MOSS & BARNETT 747.50 North American Safety, Inc.700-0000-4240 73.80 5/26/2022 Safety Vest North American Safety, Inc.701-0000-4240 73.80 5/26/2022 Safety Vest 147.60 5/26/2022 North American Safety, Inc. 147.60 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 101-1170-4110 329.40 5/26/2022 Supplies 329.40 5/26/2022 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 329.40 OPG-3, Inc 760-1160-4212 2,790.08 5/19/2022 Laserfiche Full Client 2,790.08 5/19/2022 OPG-3, Inc 2,790.08 PALMER PAUL 101-1766-4300 51.00 6/2/2022 Softball Umpire AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 8 of 13 264 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 51.00 6/2/2022 PALMER PAUL 51.00 Pedretti Christine Lea 101-1539-4300 619.45 5/26/2022 Yoga Instruction 619.45 5/26/2022 Pedretti Christine Lea 101-1539-4300 1,818.70 6/2/2022 Yoga 1,818.70 6/2/2022 Pedretti Christine Lea 2,438.15 Premium Waters, Inc 101-1550-4120 4.00 5/19/2022 Supplies 4.00 5/19/2022 Premium Waters, Inc 4.00 Rent N Save Portable Services 101-1550-4400 4,052.00 6/2/2022 Portable Restrooms 4,052.00 6/2/2022 Rent N Save Portable Services 4,052.00 Road Machinery & Supplies 101-1320-4120 114.53 5/26/2022 Supplies Road Machinery & Supplies 101-1320-4120 -151.43 5/26/2022 Supplies - Return Road Machinery & Supplies 101-1320-4120 84.27 5/26/2022 Supplies 47.37 5/26/2022 Road Machinery & Supplies 47.37 Safety Vehicle Solutions 400-1220-4704 1,550.00 5/26/2022 Safety Equipment AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 9 of 13 265 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,550.00 5/26/2022 Safety Vehicle Solutions 1,550.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 101-1220-4140 183.03 5/26/2022 Supplies 183.03 5/26/2022 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 183.03 Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2037 183.84 6/2/2022 June Life Sun Life Financial 210-0000-2011 8.22 6/2/2022 June Life Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 17.03 6/2/2022 June Life - Cobra Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2011 550.73 6/2/2022 June Life Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2037 183.84 6/2/2022 June Life Sun Life Financial 101-0000-2037 820.34 6/2/2022 June Life Sun Life Financial 701-0000-2011 29.80 6/2/2022 June Life Sun Life Financial 700-0000-2011 44.66 6/2/2022 June Life Sun Life Financial 720-0000-2011 24.54 6/2/2022 June Life 1,863.00 6/2/2022 Sun Life Financial 1,863.00 Thelen Inc 101-1600-4130 280.99 6/2/2022 Magnet 280.99 6/2/2022 Thelen Inc 280.99 TWIN CITY SEED CO.101-1550-4150 405.00 5/19/2022 Materials 405.00 5/19/2022 TWIN CITY SEED CO.720-7207-4150 302.37 5/26/2022 Materials TWIN CITY SEED CO.101-1320-4150 302.38 5/26/2022 Materials TWIN CITY SEED CO.701-0000-4150 302.37 5/26/2022 Materials TWIN CITY SEED CO.700-0000-4150 302.38 5/26/2022 Materials AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 10 of 13 266 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,209.50 5/26/2022 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 1,614.50 VESSCO INC 700-7043-4120 135.00 5/26/2022 Supplies VESSCO INC 700-7043-4120 500.00 5/26/2022 Supplies VESSCO INC 700-7043-4120 1,218.00 5/26/2022 Supplies 1,853.00 5/26/2022 VESSCO INC 1,853.00 WATSON COMPANY 101-1620-4130 252.38 5/26/2022 Supplies WATSON COMPANY 101-1540-4130 1,422.07 5/26/2022 Supplies 1,674.45 5/26/2022 WATSON COMPANY 1,674.45 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 420-0000-4150 56.00 5/26/2022 Materials 56.00 5/26/2022 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 56.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 101-1110-4300 1,048.50 5/26/2022 Professional Fees 1,048.50 5/26/2022 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 1,048.50 XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 757.94 5/19/2022 Monthly Service 757.94 5/19/2022 XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1370-4320 1,684.34 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 33.20 5/26/2022 Monthly Service AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 11 of 13 267 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7043-4320 6,504.45 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1220-4320 1,159.64 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 27.60 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1171-4320 35.48 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1170-4320 -235.87 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 27.60 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 210.54 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1190-4320 -278.39 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 27.60 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 5,865.58 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 700-7019-4320 4,703.99 5/26/2022 Monthly Service XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 210.54 5/26/2022 Monthly Service 19,976.30 5/26/2022 XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1550-4320 -85.35 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 144.60 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1540-4320 1,065.04 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 32.78 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 22,316.05 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 701-0000-4320 780.19 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 -945.45 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 700-0000-4320 111.34 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 33.27 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 13.52 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1600-4320 62.63 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 26.94 6/2/2022 Monthy Service XCEL ENERGY INC 101-1350-4320 114.64 6/2/2022 Monthy Service 23,670.20 6/2/2022 XCEL ENERGY INC 44,404.44 ZIEGLER INC 700-7043-4150 740.19 5/26/2022 Materials ZIEGLER INC 700-7043-4120 2,274.50 5/26/2022 Supplies 3,014.69 5/26/2022 ZIEGLER INC 3,014.69 AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 12 of 13 268 Last Name Acct 1 Amount Check Date Description 1,141,726.16 AP - Check Detail-ACH (6/7/2022)Page 13 of 13 269 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Approve Fireworks Permit for the Lake Minnewashta Homeowners Association Event Scheduled for July 3, 2022 File No.Item No: D.5 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves a fireworks permit for the Lake Minewashta Homeowners Association Event scheduled for July 3, 2022." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY Approve fireworks permit associated to aerial device, fireworks show on Lake Minnewashta. This is an annual event planned by, and with financial support from, the Lake Minnewashta Homeowners Association (HOA). BACKGROUND This event has ran concurrent to the Lake Ann Fireworks display for the past many years. Traditionally, the same fireworks contractor is utilized each year for both shows. This year, the City's contractor could not provide the resources needed to conduct an additional display on Lake Minnewashta which led to the HOA finding another contractor that was only available on July 3rd. The contractor submitted a City of Chanhassen Fireworks Permit Application and provided the required license and launch plan. The HOA has received a permit from Carver County Parks as the launch site is 270 on premise of Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. The Chanhassen Fire Marshal will inspect and verify the launch site prior to the scheduled launch time. The Chanhassen Fire Department will staff a suppression resource and likely a UAV for the detail. The Carver County Sheriff's Water Patrol will be on the water with a watercraft for safety and enforcement. The anticipated launch time is set for 10pm and will last approximately 20 minutes. DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the permit for a fireworks display at Lake Minnewashta on July 3rd, 2022. ATTACHMENTS KABOOM Signed Permit Application KABOOM Certificate of Insurance Carver County Certificate of Insurance Lacy Woitalla Fireworks Operator License Lake Minnewashta KABOOM Launch Site Map 271 6.14.22 6.14.22 272 CERTIFICATE HOLDER © 1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2010/05) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CANCELLATION DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE LOCJECTPRO-POLICY GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: OCCURCLAIMS-MADE COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES (Ea occurrence)$DAMAGE TO RENTED EACH OCCURRENCE $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ $RETENTIONDED CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $ AGGREGATE $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) INSRLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF(MM/DD/YYYY)POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY)LIMITS WC STATU-TORY LIMITS OTH-ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ $ $ ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below (Mandatory in NH) OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNEDAUTOSAUTOS AUTOS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ $ $ $ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL WVD SUBR N / A $ $ (Ea accident) (Per accident) THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: INSURED PHONE(A/C, No, Ext): PRODUCER ADDRESS:E-MAIL FAX(A/C, No): CONTACTNAME: NAIC # INSURER A : INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Britton-Gallagher and Associates,Inc. One Cleveland Center,Floor 30 1375 East 9th Street Cleveland OH 44114 216-658-7100 216-658-7101 info@brittongallagher.com Everest Denali Insurance Company 16044 2027 JAMES RIVER INS CO 12203RESSpecialtyPyrotechnicsInc 21595 286th Street Belle Plaine MN 56011 Axis Surplus Ins Company 26620 1344707992 B X 1,000,000 100,000 X 1,000,000 5,000,000 2,000,000 00090431-3 4/1/2022 4/1/2023 X A 1,000,000 X X X SI8CA00190-221 4/1/2022 4/1/2023 C X 5,000,000 5,000,000 P001000273872-03 4/1/2022 4/1/2023 X 5/10/2022 Additional Insured extension of coverage is provided by above referenced General Liability policy where required by written agreement. Display Date:July 3,2022 Display Location:Lake Minnewashta Park,Chanhassen,Minnesota Additional Insured:City of Chanhassen;Keeping America's Birthday Observation over Minnewashta KABOOM Attn:Gary Bhojwani 3301 Shore Drive Excelsior MN 55331 USA 273 CERTIFICATE HOLDER © 1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2010/05) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CANCELLATION DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE LOCJECTPRO-POLICY GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: OCCURCLAIMS-MADE COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES (Ea occurrence)$DAMAGE TO RENTED EACH OCCURRENCE $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ $RETENTIONDED CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $ AGGREGATE $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) INSRLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF(MM/DD/YYYY)POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY)LIMITS WC STATU-TORY LIMITS OTH-ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ $ $ ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below (Mandatory in NH) OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNEDAUTOSAUTOS AUTOS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ $ $ $ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADDL WVD SUBR N / A $ $ (Ea accident) (Per accident) THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: INSURED PHONE(A/C, No, Ext): PRODUCER ADDRESS:E-MAIL FAX(A/C, No): CONTACTNAME: NAIC # INSURER A : INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Britton-Gallagher and Associates,Inc. One Cleveland Center,Floor 30 1375 East 9th Street Cleveland OH 44114 216-658-7100 216-658-7101 info@brittongallagher.com Everest Denali Insurance Company 16044 2027 JAMES RIVER INS CO 12203RESSpecialtyPyrotechnicsInc 21595 286th Street Belle Plaine MN 56011 Axis Surplus Ins Company 26620 1746167803 B X 1,000,000 100,000 X 1,000,000 5,000,000 2,000,000 00090431-3 4/1/2022 4/1/2023 X A 1,000,000 X X X SI8CA00190-221 4/1/2022 4/1/2023 C X 5,000,000 5,000,000 P001000273872-03 4/1/2022 4/1/2023 X 5/10/2022 Additional Insured extension of coverage is provided by above referenced General Liability policy where required by written agreement. Display Date:July 3,2022 Display Location:Lake Minnewashta Park,Chanhassen,Minnesota Additional Insured:Carver County,Minnesota Excess coverage follows form to underlying policies listed. Carver County 600 East 4th St Chaska MN 55318 USA 274 275 Lake Minnewashta July 3, 2022 Maximum Shell Size: 6” NFPA 1123 Fallout Zone Radius: 420 ft Shoot site Fallout zone NSpectatorsParking Spectators on boats ✕ ✕276 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Approve Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications for Erhart Farm and Resolution 2022-XX: Remove Property from the Rural Service District File No.Planning Case No. 2021-12A Item No: D.6 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the: Final Plat for Erhart Farm creating 19 single-family lots, eight outlots, and public right-of-way subject to the conditions of approval; Development Contract for Erhart Farm; Plans and Specifications for Erhart Farm; and Resolution Removing Property from the Rural Service District." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY The applicant is requesting final plat approval for 19 lots and 8 outlots for Erhart Farm first phase, as well as approval of the development contract and project construction plans and specifications. As a condition of approval, the property will be removed from the Rural Service District. BACKGROUND On May 9, 2022, the Chanhassen City Council approved: 277 A. Vacation of Permanent Easement for Public Roadway, Drainage and Utility purposes; B. The ordinance rezoning the development from Agricultural Estate District (A2) to Single-Family Residential District (RSF) (Blocks 1 and 2); and C. Amended the Preliminary plat with a variance from the tree replacement requirements. On August 9, 2021, the Chanhassen City Council approved: A. The ordinance rezoning the development from Agricultural Estate District (A2) to Single-Family Residential District (RSF) (Blocks 1 and 2); B. Preliminary plat with variances for street width, front yard setback (Lot 1, Block 1), wetland setback (Lot 1, Block 1) and street frontages (Lots 3 through 9, Block 1). DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting the final platting of the lots east of the Eagle Ridge Road extension. BUDGET The cost for the trunk main and lift station oversizing will be paid by the City. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; approval of the development contract and construction plans and specifications; and adopting a resolution removing property from the Rural Service District. ATTACHMENTS Staff Report Erhart Farm - Final Plat Update 03-18-2022 Erhart Farm - Final Plat - Phase 1 Plans Landscape Plan Update Rural Service District Removal Resolution Erhart Farm - DC 278 TO CITY OT CIIANHASSTI'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: Jure 13,2022 SUBJ:Erhart Farm -Final Plat with Variance; Plans and Specifications; and Development Contract - Planning Case No. 2021-l2A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting final plat approval for 19 lots and eight outlots for Erhart Farm, as well as, approval ofthe development contract and project construction plans and specifications. As a condition of approval, the property will be removed from the Rural Service District. BACKGROUND On May 9,2022,the Chanhassen City Council approved: A. Vacation of Permanent Easement for Public Roadway, Drainage and Utility purposes; B. The ordinance rezoning the development from Agricultural Estate District (A2) to Single- Family Residential District (RSF) (Blocks 1 and 2); and C. Amended the Preliminary Plat with a variance from the tree repiacement requirements. On August 9, 2021, the Chanhassen City Council approved: PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen City Council approves: o Final Plat for Erhart Farm creating 19 single-family lots, eight outlots, and public right-of-way subject to the conditions of approval; o Development Contract for Erhart Farm; o Plans and Specifications for Erhart Farm; and. o Resolution Removing Property from the Rural Service District." r/OO MARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I4T.CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 279 Erhart Fann: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications Jrne 13,2022 Page2 1. The ordinance rezoning the development from Agricultural Estate District (A2) to Single- Family Residential District (RSF) (Blocks I and 2); 2. Preliminary plat with variances for street width, front yard setback (Lot 1, Block 1), wetland setback (Lot 1, Block l) and street frontages (Lots 3 through 9, Block 1). SUBDIVISION REVIEW The applicant is requesting the final platting ofthe lots east ofEagle fudge Road extension INSET A 5 "' 4 " ""-.1 2rt'- 1:.- c i-,."."rf1 .''.j The applicant is only platting the 19 lots east ofEagle Ridge Road as part ofthe first phase of the developmenl. STREETS The proposed subdivision has access to public right-of-way via Eagle Ridge Road to the north and W. 96s Street to the south. Eagle Ridge Road will ultimately extend to Powers Boulevard as development continues to the west ofthe proposed subdivision. Eagle Ridge Road is a minor collector in the City's roadway network. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS The preliminary and final plat provided illustrates mostly t)?ical public drainage and utility easements (DUE) along the proposed subdivision's lot lines with 5-foot DUE along the side and rear lot lines and l0-foot DUE along the front lot lines. Rear lot lines on Lots 1- 16, Block 1 are atypical to accommodate proposed wetland buffers, conservation easements and stormwater 280 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications June 13,2022 Page 3 improvements. Drainage and utility easements abutting the side lot lines oflots 13 and 14, Block 1 are five feet wider than the tlpical 5-foot side lot DUE (a total of 20 feet wide between the two lots), and DUE in the rear yard oflots 16 and 17 are 20 feet wide; these widths are required in order to provide adequate access for maintenance purposes to the storm sewer system and its appurtenances. However, access to the large stormwater facility which is partially located on Outlot C and partially located on Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 1 needs to be addressed as further. On October 25, 2021, the City Council approved a development contract for grading purposes (Grading DC) along with the Erhart Farm Phase 1 Mass Grading and Tree Removal Plan dated October 13,2021, contingent upon updates based on the conditions of the Grading DC. The conditions ofthe Grading DC will be incorporated into the subdivision development contract. The developer is proposing to mass grade a majority ofthe site in order to construct the public streets, house pads and stormwater management areas. However, Lots 4-10, Block 1 are being proposed to be custom graded, which will be completed during the building permit phase. The developer is proposing one retaining wall within the subdivision which will be wholly located on Lot 8, Block 1 . EROS ION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The development will exceed one (l) acre ofland disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Pemit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). Additionally, an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) in accordance with Section 19-145 of City Ordinance shall be submitted for the grading operations of the subdivision. SANIT ARY SEWER AND WATER MAINS A temporary lift station was installed by the Foxwood development to the north in order to provide sanitary service for that subdivision. The developer and their engineer have been working with staff to determine the feasibility of abandoning the temporary lift station and constructing a new permanent lift station located near W. 966 Street. The lift station has been designed to accommodate sewage flows from Foxwood, the proposed Ethart Farms subdivision, the future Erhart Farms subdivision(s), and W. 96ft Street. The subdivision has access to a 12" C900 PVC tmnk water main that was extended by the development to the north (Foxwood). This trunk main will eventually be looped to a 16" trunk main within Powers Boulevard when the property to the west develops. It will eventually connect to a future water tower location within the future subdivisions as guided for in the 2040 GRADING AND DRAINAGE RETAINING WALLS 281 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contmct; and Plans & Specifications Jurc73,2022 Page 4 Comprehensive Plan. Water main stubs will be provided for future extensions when the property to the west develops, along with a stub leading towards W. 96d Street. Lot 19, Block 1 will not be required at this time to pay hook-up fees as the lot has an existing home; fees and assessments for this lot will be collected at the time of future utility extension along W. 96ft Sfeet. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that "these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." These standards include abstraction of 1.0 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). The applicant will need to work with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the City in order to meet all the requirements. LANDSCAP ING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant has submitted a landscape plan showing a total of 314 trees to be planted in the development. Any trees planted outside of the final plat area will not be counted towards reforestation quantities. A revised landscape plan with a complete Plant Schedule listing quantities, plant names, sizes and survey symbol must be submitted to the City for approval prior to a Notice to Proceed (NTP). A tentatively scheduled planting date as well as a maintenance plan that includes regular weekly watering will be required to be submitted prior to the NTP- As part of the 314 trees required for reforestation, the applicant is including 27 trees that were planted in 2021 as part of the replacement plantings for a haul road from the applicant's wetland project. Tree plantings have been located on the west side ofthe proposed collector. The 18 proposed plantings shall be relocated to the 'reforestation mix' area on the 18 lots. No plantings will be allowed on the west side of the collector road due to future construction in that area. The applicant has requested a variance from the minimum size requirements for reforestation plantings. Staff can support the variance for allowing the 110 proposed nursery stock potted trees. The applicant has requested a variance from supplying certified nursery stock for the development. As proposed in the landscape plan, the applicant would transplant 84 trees found on site in additionto lhe27 transplanted trees installed in 2021. This equates to 35% ofthe proposed trees to be planted. Staff recommends that no more than l0% ofthe total required plantings come from uncertified wild transplants. A total of 230 trees will be scheduled for planting within the 'reforestation mix' area shall be planted as one planting project. The 230 WETLANDS AI\D BUFFERS Several wetlands were identified and delineated on and neal the property. The applicant submitted a wetland delineation report in July 2020 and the wetland tlpes and boundaries were approved in August 2020. 282 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications hne 13,2022 Page 5 trees are comprised of 110 %'-1" nursery potted trees, 89 developer installed 2.5" B&B nursery stock trees, and 31 on-site transplants. PARKS AND TRAILS The developer shall be responsible for construction of the l0-foot, asphalt trail along the western portion of Eagle Ridge Road continuing south from Outlot D, Foxwood, and connecting to W. 96ft Street. The existing concrete sidewalk on the west side of Eagle Ridge Road will be remove and replaced with a lO-foot asphalt trail beginning where Outlet E exits onto Eagle Ridge Road from the future CSAH 101 trail connection between the current trail terminus at the Bandimere Park Pedestrian Underpass and the northem terminus ofthe plat adjacent to and along CSAH 101. The developer/applicant shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing required of the Eagle Ridge Road trail. All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of construction. The trail shall be 10 feet wide, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all City specifrcations. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost of the aggregate base and trail surfacing. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance ofthe trail and receipt ofan invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses. With future phases of development, the trail will be continued out to Powers Boulevard. A trail easement encompassing the "5-foot pervious nature trail" shall be dedicated that connects to the W. 96fr Street right-of-way and terminates at an existing stormwater facility that treats runoff from CSAH 1 01 . A permanent trail and drainage and utility easement along the rear lot lines oflots 5 thru 19 shall be dedicated. Trail development may occur in the future. STORMWATER UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGES City Ordinance sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and water quantity fee is collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. The fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time;2022 rates are $8,830.00 per acre. ASSESSMENTS Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time;2022 rates for partial hookup fees are $691.00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,562.00 per unit for water. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the building permit. 283 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications llurlre 13,2022 Page 6 Fees Based on the proposal, the following fees would be collected with the development contract: a) Administration Fee: If the improvement costs are less than $500,000, 3% ofthe improvement costs. If the improvement costs are between $500,000 and $1,000,000, 2% of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000,2.5yo of the first $1,000,000 plus 1.5% ofthe remainder. b) Surface Water Management Fee: S8,830.00 per acre c) A portion of the Water Hook-up Charge: $2,562.00/unit d) A portion ofthe Sanitary Sewer Hook-up Charge: $691.00/unit e) Park Dedication Fee: $5,800.00/unit 0 Street Lighting Charge (for electricity): $300.00Aight g) GIS Fees: $100 for the plat plus $30 per parcel h) Final Plat Process (review and recording ofPlat and DC): $450.00 (already paid at the time of applicdtion REVIEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Building 1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any constmction *This condition still applies. 2. Building plans must provide suffrcient information to verifr that the proposed building meets all requtements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. *This condition still applies. 3. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit mus be obtained prior to construction. *This condition still aPPlies. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the lnspections Division before building permis will be issued. *This condition still applies. 5. Each lot must be provided with a separate sewer and water service. *This condition still applies. 284 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications Jlurt.e13,2022 Page 7 Engineering Original Conditions: l. Easements identified within the platted area must be vacated before the City Council considers final plat. *This condition shalt be modified as follows: Easements identified within the platted area must be vacated prior to or concurrently with the recording ofthe final plat. 3. The driveway to the existing residence proposed to remain (Lot 5, Block 2) must be surfaced with bituminous, concrete or other hard surface material. *This condition shalt be modified as follows: The driveway to the existing residence is proposed to remain (Lot 1, Block 1 , Buttemut Ridge) must be surfaced with bituminous, concrete or other hard surface material. 4. The developer and their design team must work with staff to update the public street layout and design, including sidewalk and trail locations. *This condition still applies. 5. Public steet sections stubbed-out for future extension must wholly be encumbered by public right-of-way and updated on the final plat. *This condition has been met. 6. The developer must work with staff to improve the public stormwater facility's access route. *This condition has been addressed by the *Water Resources' condition and can be removed as an "Engineering' condition. 7. All wetland spoils associated with Interim Use Permit #2021-03 must be removed from areas where public improvements are proposed. A geotechnical engineering firm shall be on-site during grading operations to ensure the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates are adhered to along with any Minnesota Building Code requirements' *This condition still applies. 8. Grading plans must be updated to indicate the location of soil borings. *This condition has been met. 9. The developer's engineer shall ensure that t}re maximum driveway grades shown on the plan are calculated such that a lO-foot landing is provided where the driveway connects to the street and a 5- to l0-foot landing is provided at the garage. *This condition still applies. 2. The developer will be required to obtain any necessary right-of-way easements for the extension of W. 966 Street from abutting properties. *This condition has been met. 285 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications Jrune 13,2022 Page 8 10. The future grading and conceptual build-out on Outlot E must be ptovided due to concems regarding drainage associated with Lots 1,2,3 and 4, Block 2. *This condition does not apply to this phase, the final plat and grading plans no longer include these lots and it can be addressed during future subdivisions. 1 1. Drain tile services are required for Lots 1 , 2, 3 ar,d 4, Block 2 as these lots are proposed to drain from the back of the lot towards the sfieet. *This condition does not apply to this phase; the final plat and grading plans no longer include these lots and it can be addressed during future subdivisions. 12. Any wells located on the property to be developed must be properly abandoned. *This condition still applies. 13. The developer must work with staff in the final construction plans and details of the proposed lift station along with its location. *This condition still applies. 14. A geotechnical engineer's recommendation on proper back fill and compaction for the force main extended through the abandoned lift station location must be provided. *This condition still applies. Amended Conditions: 1 . The developer will be reimbursed for the removal of the temporary cul-de-sac and extension of the street and sidewalk in this area in the amount of$33,750.00. *This condition still applies. 2. If "Eagle Ridge Way" is to facilitate parking on one-side of the road, the width will be required to be updated on the plans to a minimum of26 feet wide from face-of-curb to face-of-curb. Face-of-curb is considered 12 inches from back-of-curb with the surmountable curb design. *This condition still applies. 3 . All locations where the extension of public streets may occur shall have barricades and "Future Street Extension" sigrrs erected. *This condition still applies. 4. All comments and conditions associated with Carver County's "Development / Access Review" memo dated January 10, 2022 must be addressed or met, as applicable, prior to the City considering approval ofthe final plat. *This condition still aPPlies. 5. The final plat shall be updated to ensure DUE around the pond and infiltration basin encompass an area that is a minimum of one foot higher than the 100-year HWL. *This condition still applies. 286 Erhart Farrn: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications hne 13,2022 Page 9 7. The newly proposed public lift station shall be located on an Outlot dedicated to the City. *This condition shall be modified as follows: The newly proposed public lift station shall be located on an outlot dedicated to the City concurrently with the recording of the final plat. 8. All wetland spoils associated with Interim Use Permit #2021-03 must be removed from areas where public improvements are proposed. *This condition is redundant from "Engineering" original conditions, which still applies. 9. The developer's engineer shall ensure that the maximum driveway grades shown on the plan are calculated such that a l0-foot landing is provided where the driveway connects to the street and a 5- to 10-foot landing is provided at the garage' *This condition is redundant from "Engineering" original conditions, which still applies. 10. The developer will be required to extend the 12" trunk water main and the City will reimburse the developer for the cost ofoversizing this extension along with its appurtenances. *This condition shall be modified as follows: The developer will be required to extend the 12" trunk water main and the City will reimburse the developer for the cost difference to oversizing this extension, along with its appurtenances, from 8" to 12". I 1 . Any wells located on the property to be developed must be properly abandoned. *This condition is redundant from *Engineering" original conditions, which still applies. 12. The developer will be reimbursed 29% of the cost for the construction of the lift station. *This condition shalt be 4g!![9g! as follows: The developer will be reimbursed 29% of the cost for oversizing the lift station, which will include the following lift station components: lift station wet well, lift station pumps/hardware, lift station control panel, lift station driveway/pad, transformer, bored power for lift station, direct bury power for lift station. The developer will also be reimbursed an additional 10% ofthe oversizing cost to account for design, testing and administration fees associated with the oversizing of the lift station. 6. The applicant must update the final plat to include that they facilitate a contiguous connection between the newly dedicated DUE or right-of-way with Erhart Farms and the existing Lot l, Block 1, Buttemut fudge. *This condition shall be modified as follows: The applicant must provide DUE that facilitate a contiguous connection between the newly dedicated DUE or right-of-way with Erhart Farms and the existing Lot 1, Block l, Buttemut Ridge. 287 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications lwrc 13,2022 Page 10 13. The developer will be reimbursed for the cost of construction ofthe lift station in the amount of $48,725.04 as this was escrowed by the Foxwood development for the construction of the permanent lift station. *This condition still applies. 14. The developer will be reimbursed for the removal ofthe temporary lift station in the amount of $ 10,000.00. *This condition still applies. 15. The developer must work with staff in the final construction plans and details of the proposed lift station and its appurtenances, along with its location. *This condition is redundant from "Engineering" original conditions, which still applies. 16. A geotechnical engineer's recommendation on proper back fill and compaction for the force main extended through the abandoned lift station location must be provided. *This condition is redundant from "Engineering" original conditions, which still applies. 17. Issuance of a Notice to Proceed for the development shall not be granted until the public utilities being extended from the Foxwood development have been accepted. *This condition still applies. 18. A copy ofall required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the City which shall include but is not limited to the Minnesota Department of Health, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Riley Purgatory Watershed District, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed. *This condition still applies. 2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the edge of clearing limits and around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. *This condition still applies. 19. The applicant shall enter into a Development Contract with the City and pay all the applicable fees and securities prior to recording of final plat. *This condition still applies. Applicable conditions from approved Development Contract for Grading (Grading DC) purposes passed by City Council October 25' 2021: 1. The developer shall conduct a walk-through of the grading limits on site with City staff prior to removals to inspect for opportunities for additional tree preservation prior to grading operations. *This condition has been met. 288 Erhart Farm: Final Pla! Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications llulrle 13,2022 Page 1 I 3. A preconstruction meeting shall be held by the developer and their contractor(s) with the City and its representatives prior to grading operations. *This condition still applies. 4. A geotechnical engineer shall be on site during grading operations. If groundwater is encountered during grading, gades shall be adjusted to maintain a 3-foot separation from the bottom floor elevation and adhering to the recommendations ofthe soil engineer on site. Changes to grades shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. *This condition still applies. 6. The applicant shall provide an updated SWPPP that shall meet all requirements set forth in the applicant's NPDES Construction Permit, such as locations ofconcrete wash-outs, stockpile areas, estimated quantities oferosion control BMPs, training credentials of SWPPP installer, prior to commencement of grading operations. *This condition still applies. 7. The applicant shall provide an updated ESCP and SWPPP that address item 16. 1 - Infiltration Systems of the NPDES Construction Permit. Requirements such as excavation of infiltration systems to final grade, or within three feet of final grade, are either prohibited or require additional measures to ensure their protection. *This condition has been met. 8. The applicant shall update the ESCP and SWPPP to eliminate the use of straw mulch as a stabilization BMP. *This condition no longer applies. 9. The applicant shall supply a dewatering plan to the Water Resources Engineer for review and approval prior to dewatering activities on-site. *This condition still applies. 10. A minimum of 273 uees that meet Ordinance requirements will be required to be planted on site. Reforestation planting quantities may be recalculated if the land use changes. *This condition has been addressed by the "Environmental Resources" condition and can be removed as an "Engineering" condition. 11. A landscaping secudty of$100,000.00 was required upon issuance ofthe Grading DC. dated October 25,2021, associated with the development. Upon receipt ofthe updated engineer's estimate, if 7%o of the cost of public improvements is more, or less, than the provided landscaping security, the security will be adjusted accordingly. *This condition shall be 4g!![g! as follows: A landscaping security of $100,000.00 5. Haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose, shall be provided prior to commencement of gtading operations. *This condition still applies. 289 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications Jurc 13,2022 Page 12 was required upon issuance ofthe Grading DC, dated October 25,2021, associated with the development. Upon receipt of the updated engineer's estimate, this amount shall be reduced to $45,315.50. 12. An erosion control security for 110% of the cost oferosion and sediment controls, or $22,445.07, was required upon issuance of the Grading DC dated Oclobet 25,2027, associated with the development. Upon receipt of the updated engineer's estimate, if the cost oferosion and sediment controls is more, or less, than the provided erosion control security, the security will be adjusted accordingly. *This condition shall be modilied as follows: An erosion control security for ll0%o of the cost oferosion and sediment controls, or 522,445.07, was required upon issuance of the Grading DC dated October 25,2021, associated with the development. The updated engineer's estimate indicates that an additional $8,314.93 will be required for erosion confiol security and must be provided prior to or concurrently with the recording ofthe frnal plat. 13. All comments and conditions set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be addressed by the applicant prior to grading operations. * This condition still applies. Environmental Resources l. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any constuction activities and remain installed until completion. * This condition still applies. 2. No trees shall be located within the right-of-way or sight triangles * This condition still applies. 3. Lots 4 thru 9 shall have only one tree required in the front yard. * This condition still applies. 4. Lots 4 thru 10 shall have a Conservation E.rsement covering the existing wooded areas in the rear yards. * This condition still apPlies. 5. Lots 1 thru 3 and I I thru 13 shall have a Conservation Easement over the reforestation area. * This condition still applies. 6. All potted trees will have animal protection installed at planting time. * This condition still applies. 7. All Conservation Easement areas shall have signage posted at the property comers on each lot. * This condition still applies 290 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications J:url,e 13,2022 Page 13 8. Requted tree plantings may only be located on t ots I thru 19 and Outlots A and C and limited areas in Outlot B. * This condition still applies. 9. A revised landscape plan with a complete Plant Schedule listing quantities, plant names, sizes and survey symbol and showing the locations ofall 314 trees must be submitted to the City for approval prior to a Notice to Proceed (NTP). * This condition still aPPlies. 10. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the proposed conservation Easement for city approval and strall be recorded concurrently prior to the NTP. * Tbis condition still aPPlies' I L At the time of final landscape inspection, any transplant trees found to have less than 70% canopy or are dead will be required to be replaced with 2.5" nursery stock. * This condition still applies. 12. Totals for tree stock sizes include 146 - 2.5" B&B, 110 potted nursery stock, 31 on-site transplants, and 27 previously installed transplants' * This condition still aPPlies, 13. The applicant shall submit a tentatively scheduled planting date as well as a maintenance plan that includes regular weekly watering prior to the NTP. * This condition still aPPlies. l. No landscaping (trees, shrubs, plants) to be installed within ttree feet in all directions around each hydrant. *This condition still applies. 2. Roads 20-26 feet wide will need to have No Parking Fire lane signs on both sides ofthe road. *This condition still apPlies. 3. Eagle Ridge Way shall be posted No Parking on one side ofthe road *This condition still applies. 4. Elevation drops and gmding for roads will need to meet fire access road maximum of 10%. *This condition still applies. 5. No combuSible construction (wood) can begin until fire apparatus access roads are approved (temporary is ok) and hydrants are installed and active/usable. Foundation work is acceptable. *This condition still aPPlies. Fire 291 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications J:url,e 13,2022 Page 14 6. May not block emergency access or fire hydrants during construction at any time. *This condition still applies. Parks and Recreation 1. Park fees for Phase I of Erhart Farm of $ 1 10,200.00 shall be paid prior to recording the final plat. *This condition shall be modified as follows: Park fees for Phase I of Erhart Farm of $104,400.00 shall be paid prior to recording the final plat. 2. Outlot B shall be donated or dedicated to the City of Chanhassen to be part ofpermanent open space around the wetland complexes. *This condition still applies. 4. A permanent trail, and drainage and utility easement encompassing the "5-foot pervious nature trail" along the rear lot lines of l,ots 5 thru 19 shall be dedicated. *fhis g6ndition still applies. Planning 1 . The developer shall comply with the requirements of Carver Cormty regarding access and right-of-way to County highways. *This condition still applies. Water Resources Original Conditions: 1. The applicant shall clarifi ifthe 5-foot pervious natue trail is proposed to impact any parts of Wetland 3 near Lot 5 , Block 1 . This condition shall be 4g!!@! as follows: The applicant shall clarifr if the 5-foot 3. The developer shall be responsible for construction ofthe 10-foot asphalt trail along the westem portion of Eagle Ridge Road continuing south from Outlot D, Foxwood, and connect to W. 96e Street. The developer/applicant shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing required ofthe Eagle Ridge Road trail. All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initialion of construction. The trail shall be 10 feet wide, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost ofthe aggregate base and trail surfacing. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses. *This condition still applies. 292 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications Jtne 13,2022 Page I 5 pervious nature trail is proposed to impact any parts of Wetland 3 near l,ot 5, Block I prior to issuance of a NTP. 2. The applicant shall submit information regarding re-seeding any areas where grading is proposed within the wetland buffer, specifically in Lots 1 through 3, Block 1 and Lots 1 1 and 12, Block 2. *This condition shatl be moditred as follows: The applicant shall submit information regarding re-seeding any areas where grading is proposed within the wetland buffer, specifically in Lots I through 3, Block I and Lots 1l and 12, Block 2 prior to issuance ofa NTP. 3. The applicant shall clariff ifthe proposed stormwater filtration basin is to be used as treatrnent for only the cunent proposed subdivision or if it is to be used for future additions on the parcel. *This condition has been met - the proposed stormwater BMPs were sized for the Erhart Farm subdivision onlY. 4. The applicant shall provide a copy ofthe approved RPBCWD permit before any construction can stafi. *This condition still applies. 5. The applicant shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Plan for any proposed privately- owned stormwater facilities to be recorded with the fmal plat. *This condition shall be modified as follows: The applicant shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Plan for any proposed privately-owned stormwater facilities to be recorded with the final plat. 6. A Wetland Alteration Permit may be necessary if the proposed wetland impacts are not deemed exempt according to Sec. 20417 of the City Code' *This condition no longer applies. Amended Conditions: l. The applicant must veriff the location of the wooden bridge structure between Wetland 2 and Wetland 3 near Lot 5, Block 1 and add it to the existing conditions survey' Ifthe structure is to remain in place, the applicant shall supply bridge ratings, as-builts and an approved waterbody crossing from RPBCWD. *This condition shall be g!!@! as follows: The applicant must veri! the location of the wooden bridge structure between Wetland 2 and Wetland 3 near l,ot 5, Block I and add it to the existing conditions survey. If the structure is to remain in place, the applicant shall supply bridge ratings, as-builts and an approved waterbody crossing permit from RPBCWD. 2. The applicant shall submit information regarding reseeding any areas where grading is proposed within the wetland buffer, specifically in Lots 1 thru 3, Block I and Lots I I and 12, Block 2 orior to issuance ofaNTP. *This condition shall be moditred as follows: The applicant shall submit information 293 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Confiact; and Plans & Specifications htne 13,2022 Page 16 regarding reseeding any areas where grading is proposed within the wetland buffer, specifically in Lots 1 thru 3, Block I and Loe 1l and 12, Block 2 prior to issuance ofa NTP. 3. The developer shall work with staffto improve the public stormwater facility's access route. *This condition shall be modified as follows: The developer shall work with staffto improve the public stormwater facility's access route prior to issuance of a NTP. 4. The developer shall work with staffto improve the public stormwater facility's operation and layout to the maximum extent possible within the given limitations of the site and RPBCWD regulations-prioilq.jssuenge-sf -a-NlP.*This condition shall be modified as follows: The developer shall work with staffto improve the public stormwater facility's operation and layout to the maximum extent possible within the given limitations of the site and RPBCWD regulations prior to issuance ofa NTP. 5. The developer must work with staffto improve the design of the public stormwater infrastrucnre including pipe slopes. *This condition shall be modified as follows: The developer must work with staffto improve the design of the public stormwater infrastrucrure including pipe slopes prior to issuance ofa NTP. Area (sq. ft.) width (ft.)Depth (ft.)Hard Cover %o I sq. ft. Notes Code 15,000 90 125 25 13,750 0.34 ac LI B1 15,333 139 2st3,833 0.35 ac. @ 5 ft. front yard setback and 10 ft. wetland buffer setback variance, wetland setback L2 81 17,958 95 146 25/4,489 0.41 ac., comer lot, wetland setback L3 81 18,046 77*178 2st4,511 L4 81 29,680 63+197 2s/7,420 0.68 ac., 90 ft. at liont setback, wetland setback L5 81 28,614 74*217 25/7,153 0.66 ac.,91 ft. at front setback, wetland setback L6 BI 21,023 87*217 0.48 ac. 90 ft. at front setback, wetland setback L7 B1 20,382 87*212 25/5,095 0.47 ac.,90 ft. at front setback, wetland setback L8 81 24,737 73*212 2st6,t84 0.57 ac., 90 ft. at front setback, wetland setback COMPLIANCE TABLE 115 0.41 ac.,90 ft. at front setback 25/5,255 294 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications lurre 13,2022 Page 17 @ Approved 5-foot fiont yard setback variance and a l0-foot wetland buffer setback variance. + Approved lot frontage variance (All lots meet the lot width requirement at 30 feet setback.) Setbacks: 30-Foot Front and Rear; l0-Foot Side; Wetland 2O-foot buffer and 30-foot buffer setback RECO MMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the final plat subject to the following conditions of approval; the development contract and construction plans and specifications; and the Resolution removing property from the Rural Service District: Building l. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. Area (sq. ft.) width (ft.)Depth (ft.)Hard Cover %:o I sq. ft Notes L9 BI 27,560 704 206 25/7 478 0.69 ac., 90 ft. at front setback, wetland setback LIO BI 23,319 93 179 2515,830 0.53 ac. Comer lot LI1Bl 21,r82 90 197 25/5,295 0.49 ac., wetland setback LI2 81 t5,525 94 178 2513,881 0.36 ac., wetland setback LI3 81 19,061 95 2514,765 0.41 ac., wetland setback L14 81 )1 7)q 90 25/6,832 0.63 ac., infiltration in rear Ll5 81 23,8s4 90 25/5,964 0.55 ac., infiltration in rear L16 81 21,635 90 25/5,409 0.5 ac., infiltration in rear L17 BI 22,436 103 r80 25t5,616 0.51 ac., comer lot LISBI 20,459 164 240 25t5,11s 0.47 ac. LI9 81 82,206 159 25/20,551 1.89 ac., existing house and storm pond Outlot A 29,882 0.69 ac. Open space Outlot B 1,000,01 1 22.96, wetlands and permanent open space Outlot C 93,447 32,477 0.75 ac. Future development and lift station Outlot E 886,254 20.35 ac. future development Outlot F 594,561 13.65 ac. Future development Outlot G 874,481 20.08 ac. Funrc development Outlot H 910,403 20.9 ac. Future development 143.509 3.29 ac. Total s,102,632 117.14 ac 201 251 224 187 282 2.15, stormwater pond and wetland Outlot D ROW 295 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications hne 13,2022 Page 18 2. Building plans must provide sumcient information to veri$ that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 3. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the lnspections Division before building permits will be issued. 5. Each lot must be provided with a separate sewer and water service Engineering L Easements identified within the platted area must be vacated prior to or concurrently with the recording ofthe final plat. 2. The driveway to the existing residence proposed to remain (Lot l, Block l, Buttemut Ridge) must be sudaced with bituminous, concrete or other hald surface material. 3. The developer and their design team must work with staff to update the public street layout and design, including sidewalk and trail locations. 4. All wetland spoils associated with Interim Use Permit #202 I -03 must be removed from areas where public improvements are proposed. A geotechnical engineering firm shall be on-site during grading operations to ensure the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates are adhered to along with any Minnesota Building Code requirements. 5. The developer's engineer shall ensure that the maximum driveway grades shown on the plan are calculated such that a l0-foot landing is provided where the driveway connects to the street and a 5- to 10-foot landing is provided at the garage. 6. Any wells located on the property to be developed must be properly abandoned. 7. The developer must work with staff on the final construction plans and details of the proposed lift station along with its location. 8. A geotechnical engineer's recommendation on proper back fill and compaction for the force main extended through the abandoned lift station location must be provided. 9. The developer will be reimbursed for the removal ofthe temporary cul-de-sac and extension ofthe street and sidewalk in this area in the amount of$33,750.00. 296 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications Jvre 13,2022 Page 19 10. If "Eagle fudge Way" is to facilitate parking on one-side of the road, the width will be required to be updated on the plans to a minimum of26 feet wide from face-of-curb to face-of-curb. Face-of-curb is considered 12 inches from back-of-curb with the surmountable curb design. I 1. All locations where the extension ofpublic steets may occrr shall have barricades and "Futue Street Extension" sigrs erected. 12. All comments and conditions associated with Carver County's "Development / Access Revied' memo dated January 10,2022 must be addressed or met, as applicable, prior to the City considering approval ofthe final plat. 13. The frnal plat shall be updated to ensue drainage and utility easements (DUE) around the pond and infiltration basin encompass an area that is a minimum of one foot higher than the 100-year high water level (HWL). 14. The applicant must provide DUE that facilitate a contiguous connection between the newly dedicated DUE or right-of-way with Erhart Farms and the existing Lot 1, Block 1, Butternut Ridge. 15. The newly proposed public lift station shall be located on an outlot dedicated to the City concurrently with the recording ofthe final plat. I 6. The developer will be required to extend the 12" trunk water main and the City will reimburse the developer for the cost difference of oversizing this extension, along with its appurterurnces, from 8" to 12". 17. The developer will be reimbursed 2970 ofthe cost for oversizing the lift station, which will include the following lift station components: lift station wet well, lift station pumpVhardware, lift station control panel, lift station driveway/pad, transformer, bored power for lift station, direct bury power for lift station. The developer will also be reimbursed an additional l0% of the oversizing cost to account for design, testing and administration fees associated with the oversizing of the lift station. 18. The developer will be reimbursed for the cost of construction of the lift station in the amount of$48,725.04 as this was escrowed by the Foxwood development for the construction of the permanent lift station. 19. The developer will be reimbursed for the removal ofthe temporary lift station in the amount of $10,000.00. 20. Issuance ofa Notice to Proceed for the development shall not be granted until the public utilities being extended fiom the Foxwood development have been accepted. 297 21. A copy ofall required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the City which shall include but is not limited to the Minnesota Department of Health, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Riley Purgatory Watershed District, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 22. The applicant shall enter into a Development Contract with the City and pay all the applicable fees and securities prior to recording of final plat. 23. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the edge of clearing limits and around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 24. A preconstruction meeting shall be held by the developer and their contractor(s) with the City and its representatives prior to grading operations. 25. A geotechnical engineer shall be on site during grading operations. If groundwater is encountered during grading, grades shall be adjusted to maintain a 3-foot separation from the bottom floor elevation and adhering to the recommendations ofthe soil engineer on site. Changes to grades shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 26. Haul routes for the import or export ofsoil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other pwpose, shall be provided prior to commencement of grading operations. 27. The applicant shall provide an updated SWPPP that shall meet all requirements set forth in the applicant's NPDES Construction Permit, such as locations of concrete wash-outs, stockpile .[eas, estimated quantities oferosion control BMPs, training credentials of SWPPP installer, prior to commencement of grading operations. 28. The applicant shall supply a dewatering plan to the Water Resources Engineer for review and approval prior to dewatering activities on site. 29. A landscaping security ofS100,000.00 was required upon issuance ofthe Grading DC, dated October 25,2021, associated with the development. Upon receipt of the updated engineer's estimate, this amount shall be reduced to $45,315.50. 30. An erosion control security for 1l0o% of the cost oferosion and sediment controls, or $22,445.07,was required upon issuance ofthe Grading DC dated October 25, 2021, associated with the development. The updated engineer's estimate indicates that an additional $8,314.93 will be required for erosion control security and must be provided prior to or concurrently with the recording ofthe final plat. 31. All comments and conditions set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be addressed by the applicant prior to grading operations. Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Conract; and Plans & Specifications lvne 13,2022 Page 20 298 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications Jwre 13,2022 Page2l Environmental Resources 1. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed arormd eisting trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion 2. No trees shall be located within the right-of-way or sight triangles. 3. Lots 4 ttru 9 shall have only one fiee required in the front yard. 4. Lots 4 thru 10 shall have a Conservation Easement covering the existing wooded areas in the rear yards. 5 . Lots I thru 3 and I I thru I 3 shall have a Conservation Easement over the reforestation area. 6. All pofted trees will have animal protection installed at planting time. 7. All Conservation Easement areas strall have sigrage posted at the property comers on each lot. 8. Required tree plantings may only be located on Lots I thru 19 and Outlots A and C and limited areas in Outlot B. 9. A revised landscape plan with a complete Plant Schedule listing quantities, plant names, sizes and survey symbol and showing the locations ofall 314 trees must be submitted to the city for approval prior to a Notice to Proceed. 10. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the proposed Conservation Easement for City approval and shall be recorded concurrently prior to the Notice to Proceed. I 1. At the time of final landscape inspection, any transplant trees foud to have less than 70% canopy or are dead will be required to be replaced with 2.5" nursery stock. 12. Totals for tree stock sizes include 146-2.5"8&8, 110 potted nurserystock,3l on-site transplants, and 27 previously installed transplants. 13. The applicant shall submit a tentatively scheduled planting date as well as a maintenance plan that includes regular weekly watering prior to the Notice to Proceed. Fire 1. No landscaping (trees, shrubs, plants) to be installed within three feet in all directions around each hydrant 2. RoaAs2U26 feet wide will need to have No Parking Fire t ane signs on both sides of the road. 299 Erhart Fann: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications l:uitlre 13,2022 Page22 3. Eagle Ridge Way shall be posted No Parking on one side of the road. 4. Elevation drops and grading for roads will need to meet fire access road maximum of 1070 5. No combustible construction (wood) can begin until fire apparatus access roads are approved (temporary is ok) and hydrants are installed and active/usable. Fomdation work is acceptable. 6. May not block emergency access or fire hydrants during construction at any time. Parls and Recreation 1. Park fees for Phase I of Erhart Farm of $ 1 10,200.00 shall be paid prior to recording the final plat. 2. Outlot B shall be donated or dedicated to the City of Chanhassen to be part of permanent open space around the wetland complexes. 3. The developer shall be responsible for construction ofthe l0-foot, asphalt nail along the westem portion ofEagle Ridge Road continuing south from Outlot D, Foxwood, and connect to W. 966 Street. The developer/applicant shall provide desip, engineering, construction and testing required ofthe Eagle Ridge Road trail. All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of construction. The trail shall be 10-feet' surfaced wittr asphalt and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost ofthe aggregate base and trail surfacing. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance ofthe u.ail and receipt ofan invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, desigr, engineering and testing services are not reimbwsable expenses. 4. A permanent trail, and drainage and utility easement encompassing the "S-foot pervious nature trail" along the rear lot lines of lots 5 thru 19 shall be dedicated. Planning 1 . The developer shall comply with the requirements of Carver County regarding access and right-of-way to County highways. Water Resources The applicant shall clariff if the 5-foot pervious nature trail is proposed to impact any parts of Wetland 3 near Lot 5, Block I prior to issuance ofa Notice to Proceed. 300 Erhart Farm: Final Plat; Development Contract; and Plans & Specifications hne 13,2022 Page23 2. The applicant shall submit information regarding re-seeding any areas where grading is proposed within the wetland buffer, specifically in Lots I through 3, Block I and Lots 1l and 12, Block 2 prior to issuance ofa Notice to Proceed. 3. The applicant shall provide a copy ofthe approved RPBCWD permit before any construction can start. 4. The applicant shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Plan for any proposed privately-owned stormwater facilities to be recorded with the final plat. 6. The applicant shall enter into an O&M Agreement for any proposed privately owned stormwater facilities to be recorded with the final plat. 7. The developer shall work with staff to improve the public stormwater facility's access route prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 8. The developer shall work with staff to improve the public stormwater facility's operation and layout to the maximum extent possible within the given limitations of the site and RPBCWD regulations prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 9. The developer must work with staff to improve the design of the public stormwater infrastructue including pipe slopes prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 1. Preliminary Plat 2. Final Plat 3. Construction Plans 4. DevelopmentContract 5. Resolution t:\plan\2020 plannint cases\20-22 64t0 yosemi& avenue (d€er haven) sub\final plaAdeer haven final plar dc and plans and spccs rpt.docx 5. The applicant must verifr the location of the wooden bridge structure between Wetland 2 and Wetland 3 near Lot 5, Block 1 and add it to the existing conditions survey. If the structure is to remain in place the applicant shall supply bridge ratings, as-builts and an approved waterbody crossing permit from RPBCWD. ATTACHMENTS 301 ERHART FARMKNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Black Cherry Development LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property, situated in the County of Carver, State of Minnesota,to wit:The West 183.00 feet of the South 290.40 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Sec. 25, T. 116, R. 23.ANDThat part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, lying easterly and northeasterly of the following described line:Beginning at the most southerly northeast corner of said Outlot A, said point also being the northeast corner of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West; thence South 00 degrees 28 minutes 49seconds East, assuming the most southerly north line of said Outlot A has a bearing of North 89 degrees 58 minutes 27 seconds East, a distance of 566.98 feet; thence South 75 degrees 21 minutes 54 secondsEast 655.69 feet to an angle point in the southerly line of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating.EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following:That part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 101, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONRIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 10-46, AND 10-47, according to the recorded plats thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, and easterly of the following described line:Commencing at point B7 of said right of way plat; thence South 89 degrees 34 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Outlot A 32.22 feet to the point of beginning of a line tobe described; thence northerly 200.91 feet along a non tangential curve, concave to the west, central angle 20 degrees 11 minutes 41 seconds, radius 570.00 feet, chord bearing North 09 degrees 18 minutes16 seconds West; thence northwesterly 435.88 feet along a compound curve, concave to the southwest, radius 703.00 feet, central angle 35 degrees 31 minutes 29 seconds; thence North 54 degrees 55minutes 36 seconds West, along tangent, 516.07 feet to a point on said westerly right of way line and said line there terminating.ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following:That part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line described as follows:Commencing at the South corner of Lot 2, Block 4, FOXWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 secondsWest along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet;thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating.TOGETHER WITH the following:That part of Lot 2, Block 4, FOXWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of a line described as follows:Commencing at the Southerly corner of Lot 2, Block 4, FOXWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05seconds West along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09feet; thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating.And that Timothy A. Erhart and Dawne M. Erhart, husband and wife, owners of the following described property:That part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly and southwesterly of the following described line:Beginning at the most southerly northeast corner of said Outlot A, said point also being the northeast corner of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West; thence South 00 degrees 28 minutes 49seconds East, assuming the most southerly north line of said Outlot A has a bearing of North 89 degrees 58 minutes 27 seconds East, a distance of 566.98 feet; thence South 75 degrees 21 minutes 54 secondsEast 655.69 feet to an angle point in the southerly line of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating.EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following:Tract A: Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota; which lies westerly and northwesterly of Line 1 described below:Line 1: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 26; thence westerly on an azimuth of 269 degrees 58 minutes 40 seconds along the north line of said section for 2271.51 feet to the point ofbeginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 238 degrees 14 minutes 10 seconds for 95.58 feet; thence on an azimuth of 248 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds for 90.18 feet; thence on anazimuth of 260 degrees 03 minutes 27 seconds for 191.03 feet; thence on an azimuth of 217 degrees 01 minutes 09 seconds for 126.73 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point “A”; thence continue on anazimuth of 217 degrees 01 minutes 09 seconds for 15.12 feet; thence on an azimuth of 172 degrees 14 minutes 03 seconds for 234.17 feet; thence on an azimuth of 177 degrees 20 minutes 28 seconds for336.70 feet; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 17 minutes 57 seconds for 279.90 feet; thence on an azimuth of 181 degrees 15 minutes 16 seconds for 104.15 feet; thence on an azimuth of 183 degrees 39minutes 13 seconds for 116.63 feet to a point on the south line of said Tract A and there terminating.Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as ERHART FARM and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat.In witness whereof said Black Cherry Development LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _________ day of _____________________, 20_____.Signed: Black Cherry Development LLC_____________________________________________Timothy A. Erhart, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF ____________________This instrument was acknowledged before me on _______________________________ by Timothy A. Erhart, Manager of Black Cherry Development LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company.________________________________________________________________________________________________Printed NameNotary Public, __________________ County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires __________________________In witness whereof said Timothy A. Erhart and Dawne M. Erhart, husband and wife, have hereunto set their hands to this _________ day of _____________________, 20_____._____________________________________________ _____________________________________________Timothy A. Erhart Dawne M. Erhart STATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF ____________________This instrument was acknowledged before me on _______________________________ by Timothy A. Erhart and Dawne M. Erhart.________________________________________________________________________________________________Printed NameNotary Public, __________________ County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires __________________________SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATEI Daniel P. Ekrem do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of theboundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wetlands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat.Dated this ____ day of _________________, 20______________________________________________Daniel P. Ekrem, Licensed Land SurveyorMinnesota License No. 57366STATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF _____________________This instrument was acknowledged before me on ____________________________ by Daniel P. Ekrem, a Licensed Land Surveyor.________________________________________________________________________________________________Printed NameNotary Public, __________________ County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires __________________________CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAThis plat of ERHART FARM was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______, andsaid plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2.City Council, City of Chanhassen, MinnesotaBy: ___________________________________________________________________MayorClerkCOUNTY SURVEYOR, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTAPursuant to Chapter 395, Minnesota Laws of 1971, this plat has been approved this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______.Brian Praske, County SurveyorBy: ________________________________COUNTY AUDITOR, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTAI hereby certify that taxes payable in _________________ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______.Crystal Campos, County AuditorBy: ________________________________COUNTY RECORDER, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTAI hereby certify that this plat of ERHART FARM was filed this ______________ day of _____________________, 20______, at _____ o'clock ___.M. as Document Number ___________________ .Kaaren Lewis, County RecorderBy: ________________________________302 N89°35'13"W 2685.43S03°39'00"W116.56S01°15'03"W104.15S00°17'44"W279.90 S02°39'45"E336.70 S07°46'10"E168.21S00°08'37"W77.44S37°00'56"W126.72S80°03'14"W191.03S68°55'16"W90.18S58°13'57"W95.58N89°58'27"E 2271.51R=330.00L=66.00=11°27'30"C.Brg=N42°22'13"WS41°54'02"W134.40S48°05'58"E61.09N00°02'05"W167.28S89°53'00"E 514.70R=635.83L=195.96=17°39'30"C.Brg=S10°11'55"ER=358.31L=237.58Δ=37°59'27"R=1069.13L=138.63Δ=7°25'46"S64°26'53"E10.91N54°55'43"W 515.59R=703.00L=435.88=35°31'29"R=570.00L=200.91=20°11'41"C.Brg=N9°18'23"WN89°34'34"E 447.59N00°28'49"W 290.40S89°34'34"W300.00N00°28'49"W 290.40 S89°34'34"W150.00S00°28'49"E 290.40S89°34'34"W 450.00S00°28'49"E 290.40 N00°02'05"W201.86S00°24'46"W 333.13 N42°51'23"E 1320.23 N89°35'14"W 1275.48S00°24'46"W 778.85 N87°33'46"W146.58N81°55'26"W 298.24S75°56'36"E150.25R=180.00 L=75.39=23°59'48"C.Brg=N44°13'58"WN29°30'25"W60.00R = 5 2 0.00 L =395.46 Δ = 4 3°34'26" C .B rg = S 30°46'29"W R=470.00 L=105.49=12°51'37"C.Brg=S15°48'05"WR=2 7 0 .0 0 L=14 8 .6 1 Δ=31°3 2 '0 9 " N09°22'17" E 2 2 2 . 7 8 N33°40'02"W98.79S72°31'23"E92.79N84°27'23"E106.75S70°33'23"E47.03S82°33'08"E132.96S04°10'25"W57.16S25°33'11"E53.53S43°48'54"E44.59S01°13'06"E109.06S04°46'21"W107.79S07°07'14"W105.69S19° 4 2 ' 3 2 " W 169. 9 1 S 4 6 ° 2 8 ' 4 5 "W 1 6 4 . 6 9 S 4 1 ° 2 5 ' 2 2 "W 1 4 3 . 3 6 N00°03'17"E 182.62N73°50'29"W58.61N60°23'40"W 409.52OUTLOT FOUTLOT GOUTLOT HOUTLOT EOUTLOT BN89°34'34"E183.00N00°28'49"W 203.07N84°00'50"E 419.47S08°20'22"E 156.90 S01°25'57"E 139.74390.33716.23604.00 887.89443.68831.801239.42979.47N00°28'49"W 566.98 OUTLOT COUTLOT D S75°21'54"E 423.493.86S23°58'33"E24.73R=970.00 L=30.67=1°48'41"S22°09'52"E112.02R=580.00 L=19.77=1°57'11"C.Brg=S60°00'37"WN32°14'04"W215.6676.21257.40 33.00128.0773.791383.62INSET AINSET BN69°17'27"W165.99N75°14'56"W60.46178.76 L=46.89Δ=5°04'08"S75°56'36"E 150.25R=530 . 0 0 L = 1 2 2 . 5 1 =13°1 4 ' 3 7 " OUTLOT F OUTLOT E3.30OUTLOT DEA G L E R I D G E R O A D L=21.56=2°19'49"L=54.06Δ=5°50'40"S32°14'04"E6.49R=230.00 L=5.69=1°25'05"C.Brg=N32°56'37"WN56°20'51"E 60.00R=170.00 L=4.21=1°25'05"C.Brg=N32°56'37"WN32°14'04"W8.48R=520.00 L=16.92=1°51'50"C.Brg=S60°06'43"WOUTLOT FERHART FARMTHE ORIENTATION OF BEARINGS SHOWN ON THISPLAT IS BASED ON THE CARVER COUNTYCOORDINATE SYSTEM NAD83 (86 ADJ.).DETAIL BNOT TO SCALEDETAIL ANOT TO SCALE303 N00°02'05"W128.07 R=330.00 L=66.00=11°27'30"C.Brg=N42°22'13"WS41°54'02"W 134.40N33°40'02"W 98.79S72°31'23"E 92.79N84°27'23"E 106.75S70°33'23"E47.03S82°33'08"E 132.96N69°17'27"W 165.99N80°31'16"W 227.65N20°32'18"W 200.18N54°17'03"W 211.64N80°46'02"W 211.54N85°45'23"W 212.85S88°47'09"W 220.93S59°48 '25 "W 212 .90 S17°0 3 ' 2 5 " W 1 8 1 . 6 1 S47°38'14"W 144.57 S04°10'25"W 57.16 S25°33'11"E53.53S43°48'54"E44.59S01°13'06"E 109.06 S04°46'21"W 107.79 S19° 4 2 ' 3 2 " W 1 6 9 . 9 1 S 4 6 ° 2 8 ' 4 5 "W 1 6 4 . 6 9 S 4 1 ° 2 5 ' 2 2 " W 1 4 3 . 3 6N75°14'56"W60.46222.78 112.0241.8469.4324.73S23°58'33"E 92.30R=1000.00L=31.61Δ=1°48'41"S22°09'52"E 112.02R=30 0.0 0 L =16 5 .12 Δ =3 1 °3 2 '0 9 "R=500.00 L=108.29Δ=12°24'33"C.Brg=N15°34'33"E N67°07'09"E72.18N86°07'26"E70.65R=55.00L=88.95Δ=92°39'43"S01°12'51"E 60.43 R=725.00 L=122.87 Δ=9 °4 2'37 "S08°29'46" W 44.28N80°37'43"W65.98R=55.00L=18.24 =19°00'17"24.6446.0131.0229.41 16.91 27.3735.9825.24 44.28 60.43 70.6542.5560.20137.53 R=330.00L=138.94Δ=24°07'25"C.Brg=N36°02'16"WL=48.94=8°29'47"L=24.01Δ=4°10'07"37.1121.1934.49L=28.19Δ=19°00'17"L=31.06=20°55'59"L=63.42Δ=42°45'00"L=42.99Δ=28°58'44"L=57.6 0 Δ=4 °2 2'17 " L=70.35 Δ=5°20'20" L=46.59Δ=24°16'04"L=7 0 .45Δ=3 6 ° 4 1 '52"L=40.43=92°39'43"L=117.79 Δ=9°42'3 7" L =18 1.6 3 Δ=3 1°3 2 '0 9 "L=8.29Δ=19°00'17" L=105.49Δ=12°51'37"L=90.11Δ=9°44'28"L=20.98=2°16'05"167.53 55.24 89.82N09°22'17"E 222.78 22.20L=30.67=1°48'41"L=24.38Δ=1°21'22"36.7316.80S07°07'14"W 1 0 5 . 6 9191.0636.5930.2430.2273.93 54.14 1234567891011BL OCK 1 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD EAGLE RIDGE WAY OUTLOT A35.98L=57.42Δ=29°54'35"L=79. 3 0Δ=90° 5 2 '31"R=80.00L=126. 8 9 Δ = 90°52'31" L =14 8 .6 1Δ=31°3 2 '0 9 "S03°52'34"E 174.42 121EAGLE RIDGE ROADERHART FARMTHE ORIENTATION OF BEARINGS SHOWN ON THISPLAT IS BASED ON THE CARVER COUNTYCOORDINATE SYSTEM NAD83 (86 ADJ.).DETAIL CNOT TO SCALEINSET A304 N89°34'34"E 183.00L=122.51Δ=13°14'37" R=500.00 L=115.57 Δ=13°14'37" L= 395.46 Δ=43°34'26" L=86.45Δ=10°32'19" R=50 0 . 0 0 L = 3 . 9 4 Δ=0°27 ' 0 4 " C.Brg = N 2 2 ° 0 0 ' 2 1 " E L=7. 8 7 Δ=0°51' 0 3 " R=550.00L=49 9.41 Δ =52°01'33"L=22.19Δ=2°42'18"L=72.59Δ=7°10'15" L=90.33Δ=8°55'24" L =90.09 Δ=8°53'59" L = 9 0.0 9 Δ = 8°5 3'5 9" L=103.46Δ=10°13'12"L=45 1.0 6 Δ = 46°59'21"L=48.35Δ=5°02'12"N32°14'04"W 284.1538.37245.78R=150.00L=152.34Δ=58°11'22"158.04215.66L=75.39Δ=23°59'48"L=94.98Δ=45°21'03"43.90173.5325.44159.24R=580.00L=19.77=1°57'11"C.Brg=N60°00'37"EN29°30'25"W60.00S5 3 ° 3 9 ' 4 4 "W 1 5 0 . 1 4 N47°07'08"W 186.59N56°01'07"W 215.74N64°55'05"W231.99N73°50'29"W 269.94N74°18'30"W 190.39N69°17'27"W 165.99N00°03'17"E 182.62 N60°23'40"W 409.52S 3 6 ° 5 5 ' 5 3 " W 2 9 6 . 2 3 S17°4 8 ' 0 1 " W 2 3 8 . 8 6 S57°45 '56 "W90.6058.6135 . 7 3 12 5 . 7 9 13 4 . 7 1 211.3399.95 82.67 257.40 S00°28'49"E 290.40 33.00 R=520.00L=16.92=1°51'50"C.Brg=S60°06'43"WN56°20'51"E60.00 R=230.00L=5.69=1°25'05"C.Brg=N32°56'37"W30.0030.0030.0030.00N75°14'56"W60.4630.2430.22S89°34'34"W 450.00N89°35'13"W76.21100.0012B LO C K 1 13141516171819EAGLE RID G E ROAD96TH STREETS32°14'04"E6.49N32°14'04"W8.48R=170.00 L=4.21=1°25'05"C.Brg=N32°56'37"WR=200.00 L=4.95Δ=1°25'05"C.Brg=N32°56'37"ES89°34'34"W 184.6824.96115161819161918ERHART FARMTHE ORIENTATION OF BEARINGS SHOWN ON THISPLAT IS BASED ON THE CARVER COUNTYCOORDINATE SYSTEM NAD83 (86 ADJ.).DETAIL DNOT TO SCALEINSET B305 EXCEPTIONEAGLE RIDGE ROAD STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)96TH STREETWETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT A WETLAND 411121314151617OUTLOT BOUTLOT EOUTLOT BBLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 EAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE RIDGE ROAD96TH STREETOUTLOT DEAGLE RIDGE ROADEX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.031819FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSFUTURE DEVELOPMENTOUTLOT DOUTLOT C OUTLOT BOUTLOT BPROJECTLOCATION1ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY COVER SHEET 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALEERHART FARMCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTASUITE 700ALLIANT ENGINEERING, INC.733 MARQUETTE AVENUEMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402PH: 612-758-3080CONSULTANTFX: 612-758-3099SURVEYORENGINEERPETER GOERSLICENSE NO. 44110MARK RAUSCHLICENSE NO. 43480LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTEM: mrausch@alliant-inc.comEM: pgoers@alliant-inc.comMARK KRONBECKLICENSE NO. 26222EM: mkronbeck@alliant-inc.comDEVELOPERSUITE 3000BLACK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT, LLC14500 MARTIN DRIVE,EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344CONTACT: DAN BLAKECONTACT: TIM ERHART8-10SHEET INDEX NO.COVER SHEET1SITE, LIGHTING, AND SIGNAGE PLAN7GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANPOND, INFILTRATION AND FILTRATION BASIN DETAILS11-121314SANITARY SEWER, SANITARY FORCEMAIN AND WATERMAIN PLANCONSTRUCTION DETAILS19STORM SEWER PLAN2534-36STREET INTERSECTION DETAILS4-631-33EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANLANDSCAPE PLANLIFT STATION DETAILS15-18SANITARY SEWER, SANITARY FORCEMAIN AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES20-24STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES37TREE PRESERVATION PLAN38WETLAND BUFFER PLAN26EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT FORCEMAIN PLAN27-29EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT FORCEMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES 30EXISTING LIFT STATION REMOVAL AND FORCEMAIN CONNECTION PLANEXISTING CONDITIONS AND BOUNDARY SURVEY2-3306 TEMPORARYCUL-DE-SACC.S.A.H. NO. 17HOMESTEAD LANEFLIN T L O C K T R L N00°02'05"W 201.86 C.Brg=N42°22'13"WC=65.89N89°58'27"E 2271.51S58°13'57"W95.58N80°03'14"E 191.03N89°35'13"W 2624.99EXCEPTIONEXCEPTION S68°55'16"W90.18S37°00'56"W126.72S00°08'37"W77.44S07°46'10"E168.21S02°39'45"E 336.70S00°17'44"W 279.90S03°39'00"W116.56S01°15'03"W104.15N89°34'34"E 183.001"=100'11/24/2021PGJDTFIELD CREWDRAWN BYSCALEDATE ISSUEDJOB NO.CHECKED BY20-0090CHANHASSEN, MNERHART FARMDA,DDSignatureDate License NumberPrint NamePETER GOERSI hereby certify that this survey, plan, or reportwas prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed LandSurveyor under the laws of the state ofMinnesota.733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXNovember 24, 202144110PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONParcel 1:Lot 1, Block 1, Butternut Ridge Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office ofthe county recorder, Carver County, Minnesota.Abstract PropertyParcel 2:Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota.EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following:Tract A: Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota; which lies westerly and northwesterly ofLine 1 described below:Line 1: Commencing at the northeast corner of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West; thence westerly onan azimuth of 269 degrees 58 minutes 40 seconds along the north line of said section for 2271.51 feet to the point ofbeginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 238 degrees 14 minutes 10 seconds for 95.58 feet;thence on an azimuth of 248 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds for 90.18 feet; thence on an azimuth of 260 degrees 03minutes 27 seconds for 191.03 feet; thence on an azimuth of 217 degrees 01 minutes 09 seconds for 126.73 feet to apoint hereinafter referred to as Point “A”; thence continue on an azimuth of 217 degrees 01 minutes 09 seconds for15.12 feet; thence on an azimuth of 172 degrees 14 minutes 03 seconds for 234.17 feet; thence on an azimuth of 177degrees 20 minutes 28 seconds for 336.70 feet; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 17 minutes 57 seconds for279.90 feet; thence on an azimuth of 181 degrees 15 minutes 16 seconds for 104.15 feet; thence on an azimuth of 183degrees 39 minutes 13 seconds for 116.63 feet to a point on the south line of said Tract A and there terminating.ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following:That part of Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right ofway line of Trunk Highway No. 101, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAYPLAT NO. 10-46, AND 10-47, according to the recorded plats thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, and easterly ofthe following described line:PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, cont.Commencing at point B7 of said right of way plat; thence South 89 degrees 34 minutes 41 seconds West,assumed bearing, along the south line of said Outlot A 32.22 feet to the point of beginning of a line to bedescribed; thence northerly 200.91 feet along a non tangential curve, concave to the west, central angle 20degrees 11 minutes 41 seconds, radius 570.00 feet, chord bearing North 09 degrees 18 minutes 16 secondsWest; thence northwesterly 435.88 feet along a compound curve, concave to the southwest, radius 703.00 feet,central angle 35 degrees 31 minutes 29 seconds; thence North 54 degrees 55 minutes 36 seconds West, alongtangent, 516.07 feet to a point on said westerly right of way line and said line there terminating.ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following:That part of Outlot A, Butternut Ridge Addition according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lyingwesterly of a line described as follows:Commencing at the South corner of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof Carver County,Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West along the East line ofsaid Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thenceSouth 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet; thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating.Also:That part of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying easterlyof a line described as follows:Commencing at the Southerly corner of Lot 2, Block 4, Foxwood, according to the recorded plat thereof, CarverCounty, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West along the Eastline of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line;thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet; thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 secondsWest 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating.Abstract PropertyAND the following property not included in the title commitment; the W. 183.00 feet of the S 290.40 feet of the NW 1/4of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, T. 116, R. 23LEGENDSHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETSBOUNDARY &EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY307 EAGLE RIDGE ROADTEMPORARYCUL-DE-SACS89°34'34"W 450.00S00°28'49"E 290.40 S89°34'34"W 150.00N00°28'49"W 290.40 S89°34'34"W 300.00S89°53'00"E 514.70(M)STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)N00°02'05"W167.28N48°05'58"W61.09N00°02'05"W201.86 N00°28'49"W 290.40 N89°34'34"E 447.59N41°54'02"E134.40R=330.00L=66.00=11°27'30"C.Brg=N42°22'13"WC=65.89R=570.00L=200.91=20°11'41"C.Brg=N9°18'23"WC=199.87R=703.00L=435.88Δ=35°31'29"N54°55'43"W 515.59R=635.83L=195.96Δ=17°39'30"R=358.31L=237.58Δ=37°59'27"R=1069.13L=138.63Δ=7°25'46"S64°26'53"E 10.91EXCEPTION96TH STREETN89°34'34"E 183.00S00°28'49"E 290.40 1"=100'11-24-2021PGJDTFIELD CREWDRAWN BYSCALEDATE ISSUEDJOB NO.CHECKED BY20-0090CHANHASSEN, MNERHART FARMDA,DDSignatureDate License NumberPrint NamePETER GOERSI hereby certify that this survey, plan, or reportwas prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly Licensed LandSurveyor under the laws of the state ofMinnesota.LEGEND733 Marquette Ave, Ste 700Minneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080 612.758.3099www.alliant-inc.comMAINFAXNovember 24, 202144110SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETSNOTES1. This survey and the property description shown here on are based upon information found in the commitment for titleinsurance prepared by Trademark Title Services, Inc. as agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company, file no. 20-4566,Revision No. 3, dated July 22, 2020.2. The basis of bearings is Carver County Coordinate System NAD83 (86 adj).3. All distances are in feet.4. Wetlands depicted per delineation report provided by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc., (KES ProjectNo. 2020.041) dated July 7, 2020.5. The area of the described property is 5,155,775 sq. ft.; 118.360 acres.6. The limits of field surveyed area depicted on the survey. The contours shown outside the field surveyed area are perLiDAR information provided by the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office.7. Benchmark: TNH on NW side of southern most cul-de-sac of Eagle Ridge Road has an elevation of 900.07 feetNAVD 88.BOUNDARY &EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY308 4ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700309 5ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700310 6ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700311 EXCEPTIONEXCEPTION EXCEPTIONEAGLE RIDGE ROAD STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)C.S.A.H. NO. 17HOMESTEAD LANEFLIN T L O C K T R L 96TH STREETWETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT A WETLAND 411121314151617OUTLOT BOUTLOT EOUTLOT BBLO C K 1 B L O C K 1OUTLOT GEAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEA G L E R I D G E R O A D96TH STREETPOND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54OUTLOT DEAGLE R I D G E R O A D EX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.0318FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03INFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.07UNDELINEATED WATERBODYEX HWL 897.30PR HWL 897.30SW WATERBODYEX HWL 901.85PR HWL 901.8519FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSFUTURE DEVELOPMENT(GHOST PLAT)OUTLOT D OUTLOT C OUTLOT BOUTLOT B7ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY SITE, LIGHTING, AND SIGNAGE PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700LEGEND: SITE PLAN DATA TYPICAL LOT DETAILEAGLE RIDGE ROAD AND 96THSTREET TYPICAL SECTIONEAGLE RIDGE WAYMAINTENANCE ACCESSSECTIONSIGNAGE & LIGHTING NOTES GENERAL NOTESINSET A312 EXCEPTIONEXCEPTION EXCEPTIONEAGLE RIDGE ROAD STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)C.S.A.H. NO. 17HOMESTEAD LANEFLIN T L O C K T R L 96TH STREETWETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT A WETLAND 411121314151617OUTLOT BOUTLOT EOUTLOT BBLO C K 1 B L O C K 1OUTLOT GEAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEA G L E R I D G E R O A D96TH STREETPOND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54OUTLOT DEAGLE R I D G E R O A D EX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.0318FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03INFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.07UNDELINEATED WATERBODYEX HWL 897.30PR HWL 897.30SW WATERBODYEX HWL 901.85PR HWL 901.8519FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSFUTURE DEVELOPMENT(GHOST PLAT)OUTLOT D OUTLOT C OUTLOT BOUTLOT BHOLD DOWN DETAILS SINGLE FAMILY HOMELOOKOUT PADWALKOUT PADSUBGRADE CORRECTION8ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY MASS GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN (OVERVIEW)733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700GRADING NOTES: GRADING LEGEND: RETAINING WALL NOTES: CUSTOM LOT NOTES: 313 EAGLE RIDGE ROADSTATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)WETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT AWETLAND 411OUTLOT EOUTLOT BB L O C K 1 EAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE R I D G E R O A D EX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.03FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03INFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.07OUTLOT DOUTLOT BWWW WWW/LL WW WWW 9ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY MASS GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700GRADING LEGEND: 314 96TH STREETWETLAND 311121314151617BLO C K 1 EA G L E R I D G E R O A D96TH STREETPOND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54OUTLOT DEAGLE R I D G E R O A D EX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.101819FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSOUTLOT COUTLOT BW W W W W WW L10ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY MASS GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700GRADING LEGEND: 315 14151617BLOCK 1 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD POND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54WETLAND 311ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY POND AND INFILTRATION BASIN DETAILS 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700316 WETLAND 2324BLOCK 1OUTLOT BEX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03OUTLOT EINFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.07WETLAND 412ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY INFILTRATION BASIN DETAILS 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700317 EXCEPTIONEXCEPTION EXCEPTIONEAGLE RIDGE ROAD STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)C.S.A.H. NO. 17HOMESTEAD LANEFLIN T L O C K T R L 96TH STREETWETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT A WETLAND 411121314151617OUTLOT BOUTLOT EOUTLOT BBLO C K 1 B L O C K 1OUTLOT GEAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEA G L E R I D G E R O A D96TH STREETPOND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54OUTLOT DEAGLE R I D G E R O A D EX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.0318FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03INFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.07UNDELINEATED WATERBODYEX HWL 897.30PR HWL 897.30SW WATERBODYEX HWL 901.85PR HWL 901.8519FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSFUTURE DEVELOPMENT(GHOST PLAT)OUTLOT D OUTLOT C OUTLOT BOUTLOT BDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDISCHARGE POINT TO LAKERILEY VIA WETLAND(LAKE RILEY IS AN IMPAIRED WATERSWITHIN 1 MILE)DNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDNDDND13ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: ACTIVE SWPPP LEGENDVICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALENOTE: INSPECTOR:DURING CONSTRUCTION:EROSION CONTROL PARTIESIMPAIRED WATER REQUIREMENTLEGEND: DNDDESIGNER:INSTALLER:RESPONSIBLE PARTY318 EXCEPTIONEXCEPTION EXCEPTIONEAGLE RIDGE ROADSTATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)C.S.A.H. NO. 17 FL IN T LOCK TR L 96TH STREETWETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT AWETLAND 411121314151617OUTLOT BOUTLOT EOUTLOT BBLO C K 1 B L O C K 1OUTLOT GEAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEA G L E R I D G E R O A D96TH STREETPOND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54OUTLOT DEAGLE RI D G E R O A D EX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.0318FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03INFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.07UNDELINEATED WATERBODYEX HWL 897.30PR HWL 897.30SW WATERBODYEX HWL 901.85PR HWL 901.8519FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSFUTURE DEVELOPMENT(GHOST PLAT)OUTLOT DOUTLOT COUTLOT BOUTLOT B14ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN (OVERVIEW)733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700LEGEND: UTILITY NOTES: 319 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD PROFILEEAGLE RIDGE ROAD 1 10 32 OUTLOT A 11 OUTLOT BEAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE RIDGE ROADOUTLOT DEAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE WAY15ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700EAGLE RIDGE ROAD320 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD PROFILEEAGLE RIDGE ROAD9 6 T H S T R E E T INFILTRATION BASINEAGLE RIDGE ROAD11121314151617BLOCK 1FUTURE LOTS (4)123416ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700EAGLE RIDGE ROAD 321 WETLAND 3WETLAND 1HWL 904.661032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT ABLOCK 1EAGLE RIDGE WAYEAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE RIDGE ROADEX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10OUTLOT D17ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700EAGLE RIDGE WAY PROFILE322 96TH STREET PROFILE96 T H S T R E E T 1617EAGLE RIDGE ROAD 96TH STREET18 19 FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTS San MH 1 - Wet Well MH PROFILE18ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 70096TH STREET PROFILESAN MH 1 TO LIFT STATION WET WELLINSET A SCALE: 1" = 10'LIFT STATION PLAN ENLARGEMENT323 EXCEPTIONEXCEPTION EXCEPTIONEAGLE RIDGE ROAD STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)C.S.A.H. NO. 17HOMESTEAD LANEFLIN T L O C K T R L 96TH STREETWETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT A WETLAND 411121314151617OUTLOT BOUTLOT EOUTLOT BBLO C K 1 B L O C K 1OUTLOT GEAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEA G L E R I D G E R O A D96TH STREETPOND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54OUTLOT DEAGLE R I D G E R O A D EX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.0318FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03INFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.07UNDELINEATED WATERBODYEX HWL 897.30PR HWL 897.30SW WATERBODYEX HWL 901.85PR HWL 901.8519FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSFUTURE DEVELOPMENT(GHOST PLAT)OUTLOT D OUTLOT C OUTLOT BOUTLOT B19ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY STORM SEWER PLAN (OVERALL VIEW)733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700LEGEND: NOTES: FOR REVIEW ONLYPRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION324 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD PROFILEEAGLE RIDGE ROADWETLAND 1HWL 904.661 10 32 OUTLOT A WETLAND 4 11 OUTLOT B EAGLE RIDGE WAYEAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE RIDGE ROADEX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.03 FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03 OUTLOT D 20ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700EAGLE RIDGE ROADNOTES:325 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD PROFILE11 121314 1516 17BLOCK 1FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTS EAGLE RIDGE ROAD96T H S T R E E T 21ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700EAGLE RIDGE ROAD NOTES:326 EAGLE RIDGE WAY PROFILEWETLAND 3 WETLAND 1HWL 904.661 10 32 4 5678 9 BLOCK 1OUTLOT A 11 BLOCK 1EAGLE RIDGE WAYEAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE RIDGE ROADEX HWL 877.10 PR HWL 877.10 HWL 882.03OUTLOT D 22ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700EAGLE RIDGE WAYNOTES:327 96TH STREET PROFILE96 T H S T R E E T 151617 BLOCK 1EAGLE RIDGE ROAD96TH STREET18 19 FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTS CB 304 - FES 300 PROFILECBMH 102 - FES 100 PROFILE23ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 70096TH STREETCB 304 TO FES 300NOTES:328 CBMH 102 - FES 100 PROFILEPE 502 - FES 500 PROFILEPE 402 - FES 400 PROFILEOCS 201 - FES 200 PROFILE1314151617BLOCK 1 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD POND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54OUTLOT C24ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700CBMH 102 - FES 100PE 502 - FES 500PE-402 - FES 400OCS 201 - FES 200MH 401NOT TO SCALEMH 501NOT TO SCALEOCS 201NOT TO SCALENOTES:329 EAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE RI D G E R O A D EAGLE R IDGE WAY96TH STREETEAGLE RIDGE RO A D 25ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY STREET INTERSECTION DETAILS 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700EAGLE RIDGE ROAD - EAGLE RIDGE WAYEAGLE RIDGE ROAD - 96TH STREETEAGLE RIDGE ROAD - EAGLE RIDGE WAY330 2673211151215341012918143131617181229876532111198746OUTLOT BBLOCK 1EAGLE RIDGE ROADBLOCK 55OUTLOT COUTLOT DOUTLOT EOUTLOT EOUTLOT COUTLOT ABLOCK 3BLOCK 4BLOCK 6EAGLE COURTHAWKCREST COURT HAWKCREST CIRCLE4BLOCK 2BLOCK 1OUTLOT AOUTLOT ABLOCK 512OUTLOT FEAGLE RIDGE ROAD MATCH LINE13245BLOCK 1OUTLOT BEAGLE RIDGE ROADOUTLOT BMATCH LINEERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT FORCEMAIN PLAN (REFERENCE)LEGEND: 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700NOTES: 331 1 OUTLOT A LYMANBOULEVARD EAGLE RIDGE ROAD BANDIMERE PARKGREAT PLAINS BOULEVARDSTATE TRUNK HWY NO. 101Sanitary Sewer FM - ProfileSanitary Sewer FM - ProfileLYMAN BOULEVARDS.H. 101 GREAT PLAINS BOULEVARD CROSSROADSBOULEVARDERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT FORCEMAIN PROFILE (REFERENCE)733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700332 2732111213101291831346OUTLOT BEAGLE RIDGE ROADBLOCK 6EA G L E C O U R TWET. 5BLOCK 1OUTLOT AW. 6W. 7OUTLOT FINFILTRATIONBASIN 3INFILTRATION BASIN 1Road A - ProfileERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT FORCEMAIN PROFILE (REFERENCE)EAGLE RIDGE ROAD733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700333 1512141323211119876OUTLOT DOUTLOT EBLOCK 3BLOCK 4HAWKCREST CIRCLEWETLAND 4WETLAND 3WETLAND 34BLOCK 5W. 712OUTLOT FEAGLE RIDGE ROADINFILTRATION BASIN 21WETLAND 4EX HWL 895.04Road A - ProfileERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY EXISTING FOXWOOD DEVELOPMENT FORCEMAIN PROFILE (REFERENCE)EAGLE RIDGE ROADSAN MH 1-LIFT STATION733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700334 EAGLE RIDGE ROAD30ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY EXISTING LIFT STATION REMOVAL AND FORCEMAIN CONNECTION PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700LEGEND: NOTES: 335 31ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY LIFT STATION DETAIL - PROFILE VIEW 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700336 32ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY LIFT STATION DETAIL - PLAN VIEW 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700337 33ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY SHEET NAME 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700338 STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)POND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03INFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.0734ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY LANDSCAPE PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700SEEDING NOTES:LEGEND: PHASE 1 REFORESTATION SCHEDULE PHASE 1 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS:PLANTING NOTES:CODE REQUIREMENTS & NOTES:339 EAGLE RIDGE ROADSTATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)11032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT AOUTLOT EOUTLOT BB L O C K 1 EAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE R I D G E R O A D FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03INFILTRATION BASIN 3HWL 906.07OUTLOT DOUTLOT BPROJECTLOCATION35ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY LANDSCAPE PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700OFF-SITE TREES (PARCEL ID: 250230230)CONTEXT MAP340 96TH STREET10911121314151617OUTLOT EBLO C K 1 B L O C K 1 EA G L E R I D G E R O A D96TH STREETPOND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54OUTLOT DEAGLE R I D G E R O A D18 19FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSOUTLOT COUTLOT B36ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY LANDSCAPE PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700LEGEND: 341 WETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT A WETLAND 411121314151617OUTLOT BOUTLOT EOUTLOT BBLO C K 1 B L O C K 1OUTLOT GEAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEA G L E R I D G E R O A D96TH STREETOUTLOT DEAGLE R I D G E R O A D EX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.0318UNDELINEATED WATERBODYEX HWL 897.30PR HWL 897.30SW WATERBODYEX HWL 901.85PR HWL 901.8519FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSFUTURE DEVELOPMENT(GHOST PLAT)OUTLOT D OUTLOT C OUTLOT BOUTLOT BEXCEPTIONEXCEPTION EXCEPTIONEAGLE RIDGE ROAD STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)C.S.A.H. NO. 17HOMESTEAD LANEFLIN T L O C K T R L 96TH STREET37ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700TREE PRESERVATION NOTES: LEGEND: *SEE SEPARATE TREEMANAGEMENT PLAN SET FORPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TREEPRESERVATION CALCULATION342 EXCEPTIONEAGLE RIDGE ROAD STATE TRUNK HWY. NO. 101(GREAT PLAINS BLVD.)WETLAND 3WETLAND 2WETLAND 1HWL 904.6611032456789BLOCK 1OUTLOT A WETLAND 411121314151617OUTLOT BOUTLOT BBLOCK 1 BLOCK 1 EAGLE RIDGE WAY EAGLE RIDGE ROADEAGLE RIDGE ROAD96TH STREETPOND AND INFILTRATION BASINNWL 882.00HWL 885.54EAGLE RIDGE ROADEX HWL 877.10PR HWL 877.10EX HWL 879.44PR HWL 879.43EX HWL 895.04PR HWL 895.0318FILTRATION BASIN 2HWL 882.03FUTURE BLOCK 2 LOTSOUTLOT DOUTLOT C OUTLOT BOUTLOT B38ERHART FARM FINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITY WETLAND BUFFER PLAN 733 Marquette AvenueMinneapolis, MN 55402612.758.3080www.alliant-inc.comSuite 700LEGEND: WETLAND SUMMARYWETLAND BUFFER CALCULATIONWETLAND IMPACT CALCULATIONNOTESBUFFER SIGN DETAILNOTE 343 EAGLE RIDGE ROADS T A T E T R U N K H W Y N O 1 0 1 G R E A T PLA I N S B L V D FLIN T L O C K T RL 96TH STREET 1 10 32 4 5 6 7 8 9 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT A 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 OUTLOT B OUTLOT E OUTLOT B BLOCK 1BLOCK 1EAGLE RIDGE WAYEAGLE R IDGE ROADEAGLE RIDGE ROAD96TH STREET POND AND INFILTRATION BASIN NWL 882.00 HWL 885.54 OUTLOT D EAGLE RIDGE ROAD18 FILTRATION BASIN 2 HWL 882.03 INFILTRATION BASIN 3 HWL 906.07 19 OUTLOT D OUTLOT C OUTLOT B OUTLOT B 34ERHART FARMFINAL PLAT - PHASE 1 STREET AND UTILITYLANDSCAPE PLAN733 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 612.758. 3080 www.alliant- 344 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 13, 2022 RESOLUTION NO:2022- MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION REMOVING PROPERTIES FROM THE RURAL SERVICE DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen has established rural and urban service districts; and WHEREAS, properties within the Metropolitan Urban Services Area are, or can be, served by sewer and water service; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen must determine those properties which shall be located within the rural service district; and WHEREAS, properties that have received approval from the City for subdivision purposes may no longer be considered rural. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby specifies the properties in Exhibit 1 be removed from the rural service district. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 9th day of May, 2022. ATTEST: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 345 EXHIBIT 1 LIST OF PROPERTIES TO REMOVE FROM THE RURAL SERVICE DISTRICT June 13, 2022 PID Number Owner 25.1550022 ERHART TIMOTHY A & DAWNE M g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-12a 775 96th street w., erhart farm, pp and fp\rural service district removal resolution .doc 346 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ERHART FARM DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) 347 i TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1.REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL............................................................................SP-1 2.CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL........................................................................SP-1 3.DEVELOPMENT PLANS............................................................................................SP-1 4.IMPROVEMENTS........................................................................................................SP-2 5.TIME OF PERFORMANCE.........................................................................................SP-2 6.SECURITY....................................................................................................................SP-2 7.NOTICE.........................................................................................................................SP-3 8.OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS................................................................................SP-3 9.GENERAL CONDITIONS ...........................................................................................SP-5 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.RIGHT TO PROCEED.................................................................................................GC-1 2.PHASED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................GC-1 3.PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS................................................................................GC-1 4.CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS.....................................................................GC-1 5.IMPROVEMENTS.......................................................................................................GC-1 6.IRON MONUMENTS..................................................................................................GC-2 7.LICENSE......................................................................................................................GC-2 8.SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.........................................................GC-2 8A.EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING OR OTHER BUILDING.........................................................................................GC-2 9.CLEAN UP...................................................................................................................GC-3 10.ACCEPTANCE AND OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS....................................GC-3 11.CLAIMS .......................................................................................................................GC-3 12.PARK DEDICATION..................................................................................................GC-3 13.LANDSCAPING..........................................................................................................GC-3 14.WARRANTY ...............................................................................................................GC-4 15.LOT PLANS.................................................................................................................GC-4 16.EXISTING ASSESSMENTS.......................................................................................GC-4 17.HOOK-UP CHARGES.................................................................................................GC-4 18.PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING.....................................................................................GC-4 19.SIGNAGE.....................................................................................................................GC-5 20.HOUSE PADS..............................................................................................................GC-5 21.RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS................................................................................GC-5 22.DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT.........................................................................................GC-6 22.MISCELLANEOUS A.Construction Trailers ........................................................................................GC-6 B.Postal Service....................................................................................................GC-7 C.Third Parties......................................................................................................GC-7 D.Breach of Contract............................................................................................GC-7 E.Severability.......................................................................................................GC-7 348 ii F.Building Permits...............................................................................................GC-7 G.Waivers/Amendments.......................................................................................GC-7 H.Release..............................................................................................................GC-7 I.Insurance...........................................................................................................GC-7 J.Remedies...........................................................................................................GC-8 K.Assignability.....................................................................................................GC-8 L.Construction Hours...........................................................................................GC-8 M.Noise Amplification..........................................................................................GC-8 N.Access...............................................................................................................GC-8 O.Street Maintenance............................................................................................GC-8 P.Storm Sewer Maintenance................................................................................GC-9 Q.Soil Treatment Systems....................................................................................GC-9 R.Variances...........................................................................................................GC-9 S.Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations.....................................GC-9 T.Proof of Title.....................................................................................................GC-9 U.Soil Conditions................................................................................................GC-10 V.Soil Correction................................................................................................GC-10 W.Haul Routes.........................................................................................................GC-10 X.Development Signs..............................................................................................GC-10 Y.Construction Plans...............................................................................................GC-10 Z.As-Built Lot Surveys...........................................................................................GC-11 349 SP-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) ERHART FARM SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated June 13, 2022 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, Black Cherry Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). 1.Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for ERHART FARM (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2.Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3.Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A:Final plat approved June 13, 2022, prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc. Plan B:Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated October 17, 2021, prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc. Plan C:Plans and Specifications for Improvements dated October 17, 2021, prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc. Plan D:Landscape Plan dated March 17, 2021, prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc. 350 SP-2 4.Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Water Drainage System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading/Restoration H. Underground Utilities (e.g. gas, electric, telephone, CATV) I. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments J. Surveying and Staking K. Landscaping L. Erosion Control 5.Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvementsexcept for the wear course on public streets by November 15, 2022. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City Engineer. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 6.Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bankacceptable to the City, or cash escrow ("security") for $2,716,664.34. The amount of the security was calculated as 110% of the following: Erosion Control/Restoration $ 30,760.00 Sanitary Sewer $ 910,643.72 Watermain $ 319,818.31 Storm Sewer, Drainage System, including cleaning and maintenance $ 302,621.85 Streets $ 499,365.53 Grading $ 202,565.69 Sub-total, Construction Costs $2,265,775.10 Engineering, surveying, and inspection (7% of construction costs)$ 158,604.26 Landscaping (2% of construction costs)$ 45,315.50 Sub-total, Other Costs $ 203,919.76 TOTAL COST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $2,469,694.86 SECURITY AMOUNT (110% of $2,469,694.86)$2,716,664.34 351 SP-3 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The security shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City may draw down the security, after reasonable notice to the developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. With City approval, the security may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid, but in no case shall the security be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount until (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required “record” plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 7.Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Timothy A. Erhart Black Cherry Development, LLC 9611 Meadowlark Lane Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: 612-963-0733 E-Mail: terhart@rikor.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 8.Other Special Conditions. A. FEES 1.Prior to release of the plat for recording and priorto scheduling a pre-construction meeting for installation of public improvements, Developer shall submit to the City $272,247.08 for the following City fees: Administration fee (based on estimated construction cost of $2,265,775.10, 2.5% for the first $1,000,000 + 1.5% of the remainder)$43,986.63 GIS fee: 31 parcels @ $30/parcel + $100 for the plat $670.00 Partial payment of City sewer and water hookup fees: 18 units @ $691/unit (sewer) + $2,562/unit (water)$58,554.00 Street light operating fee: 3 lights @ $300/light $900.00 Attorney Fee for Review and Recording of Plat and DC($450 – Paid with Application)$0.00 Park Fee: 18 units @ $5,800/unit (single family residential)$104,400.00 352 SP-4 Surface Water Management Fee $63,736.45 Total $272,247.08 B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Building 1. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 2. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 3. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. A final grading plan and soils report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before building permits will be issued. 5. Each lot must be provided with a separate sewer and water service. Engineering 1. Easements identified within the platted area must be vacated prior to or concurrently with the recording of the final plat. 2. The driveway to the existing residence proposed to remain (Lot 1, Block 1, Butternut Ridge) must be surfaced with bituminous, concrete or other hard surface material. 3. The developer and their design team must work with staff to update the public street layout and design, including sidewalk and trail locations. 4. All wetland spoils associated with Interim Use Permit #2021-03 must be removed from areas where public improvements are proposed. A geotechnical engineering firm shall be on-site during grading operations to ensure the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates are adhered to along with any Minnesota Building Code requirements. 5. The developer’s engineer shall ensure that the maximum driveway grades shown on the plan are calculated such that a 10-foot landing is provided where the driveway connects to the street and a 5- to 10-foot landing is provided at the garage. 6. Any wells located on the property to be developed must be properly abandoned. 353 SP-5 7. The developer must work with staff in the final construction plans and details of the proposed lift station along with its location. 8. A geotechnical engineer’s recommendation on proper back fill and compaction for the force main extended through the abandoned lift station location must be provided. 9. The developer will be reimbursed for the removal of the temporary cul-de-sac and extension of the street and sidewalk in this area in the amount of $33,750.00. 10. If “Eagle Ridge Way” is to facilitate parking on one-side of the road, the width will be required to be updated on the plans to a minimum of 26 feet wide from face-of-curb to face-of-curb. Face-of-curb is considered 12 inches from back-of-curb with the surmountable curb design. 11. All locations where the extension of public streets may occur shall have barricades and “Future Street Extension” signs erected. 12. All comments and conditions associated with Carver County’s “Development / Access Review” memo dated January 10, 2022 must be addressed or met, as applicable, prior to the City considering approval of the final plat. 13. The final plat shall be updated to ensure drainage and utility easements (DUE) around the pond and infiltration basin encompass an area that is a minimum of one foot higher than the 100-year high water level (HWL). 14. The applicant must provide DUE that facilitate a contiguous connection between the newly dedicated DUE or right-of-way with Erhart Farm and the existing Lot 1, Block 1, Butternut Ridge. 15. The newly proposed public lift station shall be located on an outlot dedicated to the City concurrently with the recording of the final plat. 16. The developer will be required to extend the 12” trunk water main and the City will reimburse the developer for the cost difference of oversizing this extension, along with its appurtenances, from 8” to 12”. 17. The developer will be reimbursed 29% of the cost for oversizing the lift station, which will include the following lift station components: lift station wet well, lift station pumps/hardware, lift station control panel, lift station driveway/pad, transformer, bored power for lift station, direct bury power for lift station. The developer will also be reimbursed an additional 10% of the oversizing cost to account for design, testing and administration fees associated with the oversizing of the lift station. 18. The developer will be reimbursed for the cost of construction of the lift station in the amount of $48,725.04 as this was escrowed by the Foxwood development for the 354 SP-6 construction of the permanent lift station. 19. The developer will be reimbursed for the removal of the temporary lift station in the amount of $10,000.00. 20. Issuance of a Notice to Proceed (NTP) for the development shall not be granted until the public utilities being extended from the Foxwood development have been accepted. 21. A copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the City which shall include but is not limited to the Minnesota Department of Health, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Riley Purgatory Watershed District, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to issuance of a NTP. 22. The applicant shall enter into a Development Contract with the City and pay all the applicable fees and securities prior to recording of final plat. 23. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed at the edge of clearing limits and around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 25. A preconstruction meeting shall be held by the developer and their contractor(s) with the City and its representatives prior to grading operations. 26. A geotechnical engineer shall be on site during grading operations. If groundwater is encountered during grading, grades shall be adjusted to maintain a 3-foot separation from the bottom floor elevation and adhering to the recommendations of the soil engineer on site. Changes to grades shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. 27. Haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose, shall be provided prior to commencement of grading operations. 28. The applicant shall provide an updated SWPPP that shall meet all requirements set forth in the applicant’s NPDES Construction Permit, such as locations of concrete wash-outs, stockpile areas, estimated quantities of erosion control BMPs, training credentials of SWPPP installer, prior to commencement of grading operations. 29. The applicant shall supply a dewatering plan to the Water Resources Engineer for review and approval prior to dewatering activities on site. 30. A landscaping security of $100,000.00 was required upon issuance of the Grading DC, dated October 25, 2021, associated with the development. Upon receipt of the updated engineer’s estimate, this amount shall be reduced to $45,315.50. 355 SP-7 31. An erosion control security for 110% of the cost of erosion and sediment controls, or $22,445.07, was required upon issuance of the Grading DC dated October 25, 2021, associated with the development. The updated engineer’s estimate indicates that an additional $8,314.93 will be required for erosion control security and must be provided prior to or concurrently with the recording of the final plat. 32. All comments and conditions set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be addressed by the applicant prior to grading operations. Environmental Resources 1. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 2. No trees shall be located within the right-of-way or sight triangles. 3. Lots 4 thru 9 shall have only one tree required in the front yard. 4. Lots 4 thru 10 shall have a Conservation Easement covering the existing wooded areas in the rear yards. 5. Lots 1 thru 3 and 11 thru 13 shall have a Conservation Easement over the reforestation area. 6. All potted trees will have animal protection installed at planting time. 7. All Conservation Easement areas shall have signage posted at the property corners on each lot. 8. Required tree plantings may only be located on Lots 1 thru 19 and Outlots A and C and limited areas in Outlot B. 9. A revised landscape plan with a complete Plant Schedule listing quantities, plant names, sizes and survey symbol and showing the locations of all 314 trees must be submitted to the city for approval prior to a NTP. 10. The applicant shall submit a plan showing the proposed Conservation Easement for City approval and shall be recorded concurrently prior to the Notice to Proceed. 11. At the time of final landscape inspection, any transplant trees found to have less than 70% canopy or are dead will be required to be replaced with 2.5” nursery stock. 12. Totals for tree stock sizes include 146 - 2.5” B&B, 110 potted nursery stock, 31 on-site transplants, and 27 previously installed transplants. 356 SP-8 13. The applicant shall submit a tentatively scheduled planting date as well as a maintenance plan that includes regular weekly watering prior to the Notice to Proceed. Fire 1. No landscaping (trees, shrubs, plants) to be installed within three feet in all directions around each hydrant. 2. Roads 20-26 feet wide will need to have No Parking Fire Lane signs on both sides of the road. 3. Eagle Ridge Way shall be posted No Parking on one side of the road. 4. Elevation drops and grading for roads will need to meet fire access road maximum of 10%. 5. No combustible construction (wood) can begin until fire apparatus access roads are approved (temporary is ok) and hydrants are installed and active/usable. Foundation work is acceptable. 6. May not block emergency access or fire hydrants during construction at any time. Parks and Recreation 1. Park fees for Phase I of Erhart Farm of$104,400.00shall be paid prior to recording the final plat. 2. Outlot B and C shall be donated or dedicated to the City of Chanhassen to be part of permanent open space around the wetland complexes. 3. The developer shall be responsible for construction of the 10-foot, asphalt trail along the western portion of Eagle Ridge Road continuing south from Outlot D, Foxwood, and connect to 96th Street. The developer/applicant shall provide design, engineering, construction and testing required of the Eagle Ridge Road trail. All construction documents, including material costs, shall be delivered to the Park and Recreation Director and City Engineer for approval prior to the initiation of construction. The trail shall be 10-feet, surfaced with asphalt and constructed to meet all City specifications. The applicant shall be reimbursed by the City for the cost of the aggregate base and trail surfacing. This reimbursement payment shall be made upon completion and acceptance of the trail and receipt of an invoice documenting the actual costs for the construction materials noted. Labor and installation, design, engineering and testing services are not reimbursable expenses. 4. A permanent trail, and drainage and utility easement encompassing the “5-foot pervious nature trail” along the rear lot lines of Lots 5 thru 19 shall be dedicated. 357 SP-9 Planning 1. The developer shall comply with the requirements of Carver County regarding access and right-of-way to County highways. Water Resources 1. The applicant shall clarify if the 5-foot pervious nature trail is proposed to impact any parts of Wetland 3 near Lot 5, Block 1 prior to issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 2. The applicant shall submit information regarding re-seeding any areas where grading is proposed within the wetland buffer, specifically in Lots 1 through 3, Block 1 and Lots 11 and 12, Block 2 prior to issuance of a NTP. 3. The applicant shall provide a copy of the approved RPBCWD permit before any construction can start. 4. The applicant shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Plan for any proposed privately-owned stormwater facilities to be recorded with the final plat. 5. The applicant must verify the location of the wooden bridge structure between Wetland 2 and Wetland 3 near Lot 5, Block 1 and add it to the existing conditions survey. If the structure is to remain in place the applicant shall supply bridge ratings, as-builts and an approved waterbody crossing permit from RPBCWD. 6. The applicant shall enter into an O&M Agreement for any proposed privately owned stormwater facilities to be recorded with the final plat. 7. The developer shall work with staff to improve the public stormwater facility’s access route prior to issuance of a NTP. 8. The developer shall work with staff to improve the public stormwater facility’s operation and layout to the maximum extent possible within the given limitations of the site and RPBCWD regulations prior to issuance of a NTP. 9. The developer must work with staff to improve the design of the public stormwater infrastructure including pipe slopes prior to issuance of a NTP. 9.General Conditions. The general conditions of this Contract are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. 358 SP-10 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and by Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 359 SP-11 BLACK CHERRY DEVELOPMENT, LLC BY: Timothy A. Erhart, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by Timothy A. Erhart, Manager of Black Cherry Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 360 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: The West 183.00 feet of the South 290.40 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Sec. 25, T. 116, R. 23. AND That part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, lying easterly and northeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at the most southerly northeast corner of said Outlot A, said point also being the northeast corner of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West; thence South 00 degrees 28 minutes 49 seconds East, assuming the most southerly north line of said Outlot A has a bearing of North 89 degrees 58 minutes 27 seconds East, a distance of 566.98 feet; thence South 75 degrees 21 minutes 54 seconds East 655.69 feet to an angle point in the southerly line of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: That part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 101, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 10-46, AND 10-47, according to the recorded plats thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at point B7 of said right of way plat; thence South 89 degrees 34 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Outlot A 32.22 feet to the point of beginning of a line to be described; thence northerly 200.91 feet along a non tangential curve, concave to the west, central angle 20 degrees 11 minutes 41 seconds, radius 570.00 feet, chord bearing North 09 degrees 18 minutes 16 seconds West; thence northwesterly 435.88 feet along a compound curve, concave to the southwest, radius 703.00 feet, central angle 35 degrees 31 minutes 29 seconds; thence North 54 degrees 55 minutes 36 seconds West, along tangent, 516.07 feet to a point on said westerly right of way line and said line there terminating. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: That part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying westerly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the South corner of Lot 2, Block 4, FOXWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet; thence 361 South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. TOGETHER WITH the following: That part of Lot 2, Block 4, FOXWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota lying easterly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Southerly corner of Lot 2, Block 4, FOXWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 02 minutes 05 seconds West along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 189.51 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2 and the point of beginning of said line; thence South 48 degrees 05 minutes 58 seconds East 61.09 feet; thence South 41 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds West 134.40 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Lot 2 and said line there terminating. And that Timothy A. Erhart and Dawne M. Erhart, husband and wife, owners of the following described property: That part of Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, lying westerly and southwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at the most southerly northeast corner of said Outlot A, said point also being the northeast corner of Section 26, Township 116 North, Range 23 West; thence South 00 degrees 28 minutes 49 seconds East, assuming the most southerly north line of said Outlot A has a bearing of North 89 degrees 58 minutes 27 seconds East, a distance of 566.98 feet; thence South 75 degrees 21 minutes 54 seconds East 655.69 feet to an angle point in the southerly line of said Outlot A, and said line there terminating. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following: Tract A: Outlot A, BUTTERNUT RIDGE ADDITION, Carver County, Minnesota; which lies westerly and northwesterly of Line 1 described below: Line 1: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 26; thence westerly on an azimuth of 269 degrees 58 minutes 40 seconds along the north line of said section for 2271.51 feet to the point of beginning of Line 1 to be described; thence on an azimuth of 238 degrees 14 minutes 10 seconds for 95.58 feet; thence on an azimuth of 248 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds for 90.18 feet; thence on an azimuth of 260 degrees 03 minutes 27 seconds for 191.03 feet; thence on an azimuth of 217 degrees 01 minutes 09 seconds for 126.73 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point “A”; thence continue on an azimuth of 217 degrees 01 minutes 09 seconds for 15.12 feet; thence on an azimuth of 172 degrees 14 minutes 03 seconds for 234.17 feet; thence on an azimuth of 177 degrees 20 minutes 28 seconds for 336.70 feet; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 17 minutes 57 seconds for 279.90 feet; thence on an azimuth of 181 degrees 15 minutes 16 seconds for 104.15 feet; thence on an azimuth of 183 degrees 39 minutes 13 seconds for 116.63 feet to a point on the south line of said Tract A and there terminating. 362 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 363 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 364 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO:City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2______, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 15, 2______. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 15 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and depositedin the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, ChanhassenCity Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 365 GC-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the County Recorder's Officeor Registrar of Title’s Officeof the County where the plat is located, and 4) the City Engineer has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2.Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 3.Preliminary Plat Status. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within two (2) years after preliminary plat approval. 4.Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5.Improvements. The improvements specified in the Special Provisions of this Contract shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, and plans and specifications which have been prepared and signed by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and other pertinent agencies before proceeding 366 GC-2 with construction. The City will, at the Developer's expense, have one or more construction inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer shall also provide a qualified inspector to perform site inspections on a daily basis. Inspector qualifications shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its project engineer/inspector to respond to questions from the City Inspector(s) and to make periodic site visits to satisfy that the construction is being performed to an acceptable level of quality in accordance with the engineer's design. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6.Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.021. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 7. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 8.Site Erosion and SedimentControl. Before the site is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion and sediment control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosionand sediment transport. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion and sediment transport at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Erosion and sediment control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored, even if construction has been completed and accepted. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion and sediment control, the City will authorize the removal of the erosion and sediment control, i.e. hay bales and silt fence. The Developer shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. 8a.Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. 367 GC-3 9.Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 10.Acceptance and Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. After completion of the improvements, a representative of the contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection of the work with the City Engineer. Before the City accepts the improvements, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the Developer and his engineer shall submit a written statement to the City Engineer certifying that the project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The appropriate contractor waivers shall also be provided. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall be by City Council resolution. 11.Claims. In the event that the City receives claims from laborers, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment out of the financial guarantees posted with the City, and if the claims are not resolved at least ninety (90) days before the security required by this Contract will expire, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125% of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees. 12.Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay full park dedication fees in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. The park dedication fees shall be the current amount in force at the time of final platting pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinances and City Council resolutions. 13.Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with Plan D. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City’s approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2½) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). In addition to any sod required as a part of the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, the Developer or lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of six (6) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the 368 GC-4 escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. 14.Warranty. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A.The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B.The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to two (2) years from the date of final written acceptance. C.The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following acceptance by the City. 15.Lot Plans. Prior to the issuance of building permits, an acceptable Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control including silt fences, and Tree Removal Plan shall be submitted for each lot for review and approval by the City Engineer. Each plan shall assure that drainage is maintained away from buildings and that tree removal is consistent with development plans and City Ordinance. 16.Existing Assessments. Any existing assessments against the plat will be re-spread against the plat in accordance with City standards. 17.Hook-up Charges. . At the time of final plat approval the Developer shall pay 30% of the City Sewer Hook-up charge and 30% of the City Water hook up charge for each lot in the plat in the amount specified in Special Provision, Paragraph 8, of this Development Contract. The balance of the hook-up charges is collected at the time building permits are issued are based on 70% of the rates then in effect, unless a written request is made to assess the costs over a four year term at the rates in effect at time of application. 18.Public Street Lighting. The Developer shall have installed and pay for public street lights in accordance with City standards. The public street lights shall be accepted for City ownership and maintenance at the same time that the public street is accepted for ownership and maintenance. A plan shall be submitted for the City Engineer's approval prior to the installation. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $300.00 for each street light installed in 369 GC-5 the plat. The fee shall be used by the City for furnishing electricity and maintaining each public street light for twenty (20) months. 19.Signage. All street signs,traffic signs, and wetland monumentation required by the City as a part of the plat shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer. 20.House Pads. The Developer shall promptly furnish the City "as-built" plans indicating the amount, type and limits of fill on any house pad location. 21.Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall pay an administrative fee in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. This fee is to cover the cost of City Staff time and overhead for items such as review of construction documents, preparation of the Development Contract, monitoring construction progress, processing pay requests, processing security reductions, and final acceptance of improvements. This fee does not cover the City's cost for construction inspections. The fee shall be calculated as follows: i) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is less than $500,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs; ii)if the cost of the construction of public improvements is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs for the first $500,000 and two percent (2%) of construction costs over $500,000; iii)if the cost of the construction of public improvements is over $1,000,000, two and one-half percent (2½%) of construction costs for the first $1,000,000 and one and one-half percent (1½%) of construction costs over $1,000,000. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall deposit with the City a fee based upon construction estimates. After construction is completed, the final fee shall be determined based upon actual construction costs. The cost of public improvements is defined in paragraph 6 of the Special Provisions. B. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City for providing construction and erosion and sediment control inspections. This cost will be periodically billed directly to the Developer based on the actual progress of the construction. Payment shall be due in accordance with Article 21E of this Agreement. C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. 370 GC-6 D. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. G. Private Utilities. The Developer shall have installed and pay for the installation of electrical, natural gas, telephone, and cable television service in conjunction with the overall development improvements. These services shall be provided in accordance with each of the respective franchise agreements held with the City. H.The developer shall pay the City a fee established by City Council resolution, to reimburse the City for the cost of updating the City’s base maps, GIS data base files, and converting the plat and record drawings into an electronic format. Record drawings must be submitted within four months of final acceptance of public utilities. All digital information submitted to the City shall be in the Carver County Coordinate system. 22.Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 23.Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the pre-construction meeting for installation of public improvements. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the acceptance of the public improvements unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer’s obligations under this Contract. The City 371 GC-7 shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City’s failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. The City may also issue a stop work order halting all plat development until the breach has been cured and the City has received satisfactory assurance that the breach will not reoccur. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Building Permits. Building permits will not be issued in the plat until sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer have been installed, tested, and accepted by the City, and the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site graded and revegetated in accordance with Plan B of the development plans. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property . After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. I. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $500,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. J.Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time 372 GC-8 to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter anyother right, power or remedy. K. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. L. Construction Hours. Construction hours, including pick-up and deliveries of material and equipment and the operation of any internal combustion engine, may only occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no such activity allowed on Sundays or on legal holidays. Contractors must require their subcontractors, agents and supplies to comply with these requirements and the Contractor is responsible for their failure to do so. Under emergency conditions, this limitation may be waived by the written consent of the City Engineer. If construction occurs outside of the permitted construction hours, the Contractor shall pay the following administrative penalties: First violation $ 500.00 Second violation $1,000.00 Third & subsequent violations All site development and construction must cease for seven (7) calendar days M. Noise Amplification. The use of outdoor loudspeakers, bullhorns, intercoms, and similar devices is prohibited in conjunction with the construction of homes, buildings, and the improvements required under this contract. The administrative penalty for violation of construction hours shall also apply to violation of the provisions in this paragraph. N. Access. All access to the plat prior to the City accepting the roadway improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer regardless if the City has issued building permits or occupancy permits for lots within the plat. O. Street Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until streets within the plat are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed by the Developer when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If streets become impassable, the City may order that such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth roadway surface and provide proper surface drainage. TheDeveloper may request, in writing, that the City plow snow on the streets prior to final acceptance of the streets. The City shall have complete discretion to approve or reject the request. The City shall not be responsible for reshaping or damage to the street base or utilities because of snow plowing operations. The provision of City snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. P. Storm Sewer Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system (including ponds, pipes, catch basins, culverts and swales) within the plat and the adjacent off-site storm sewer system that receives storm water from the plat. The Developer shall follow all instructions it receives from the City concerning the cleaning and 373 GC-9 maintenance of the storm sewer system. The Developer's obligations under this paragraph shall end two (2) years after the public street and storm drainage improvements in the plat have been accepted by the City. Twenty percent (20%) of the storm sewer costs, shown under section 6 of the special provisions of this contract, will be held by the City for the duration of the 2-year maintenance period. Q. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the platting process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. R. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District(s); 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. T. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. U. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. V. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi-lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 374 GC-10 W. Haul Routes. The Developer, the Developer’s contractors or subcontractors must submit proposed haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose. All haul routes must be approved by the City Engineer X. Development Signs. The Developer shall post a six foot by eight foot development sign in accordance with City Detail Plate No. 5313 at each entrance to the project. The sign shall be in place before construction of the required improvements commences and shall be removed when the required improvements are completed, except for the final lift of asphalt on streets. The signs shall contain the following information: project name, name of developer, developer’s telephone number and designated contact person, allowed construction hours. Y. Construction Plans. Upon final plat approval, the developer shall provide the City with two complete sets of full-size construction plans and four sets of 11”x17” reduced construction plan sets and three sets of specifications. Within four months after the completion of the utility improvements and base course pavement and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with the following: (1) a complete set of reproducible Mylar as-built plans, (2) twocomplete full-size setsof blue line/paper as-built plans, (3) two complete sets of utility tie sheets, (4) location of buried fabric used for soil stabilization, (5) location stationing and swing ties of all utility stubs including draintile cleanouts, (6) bench mark network, (7) digital file of as-built plans in both .dxf & .tif format (the .dxf file must be tied to the current county coordinate system), (8) digital file of utility tie sheets in either .doc or .tif format, and (9) a breakdown of lineal footage of all utilities installed, including the per lineal foot bid price. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. Z. As-Built Lot Surveys. An as-built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as-built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as-built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as-built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as-built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Rev. 9/30/2021 375 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Resolution 2022-XX: Approve 2022 Skid Steer Replacement Purchases File No.CIP F-Skid Item No: D.7 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Alison Albrecht, Public Works Support Specialist Reviewed By Charlie Burke SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Councils adopts a resolution approving the 2022 Skid Steer Replacement Purchases." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY The City annually considers replacement of various components of its fleet (vehicles and equipment) that have reached their useful life or that are showing signs of needing major maintenance. Our fleet has to be reliable to maintain expected and appropriate levels of service. This item includes the annual trade in of five skid loaders, which is customary each year. These items are identified in the approved 2022 CIP. The cost is over the budgeted amount due to price increases from the dealer. There is no guarantee on the state bid pricing or the trade-in price, so staff determines pricing annually. This year the price increases have far exceeded traditional inflationary increases, as is the case with much of the economy at the moment. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION 376 BUDGET Item #1 (F-Skid) Parks Department - Skid Loader T66 T4 Bobcat Compact Track Loader $65,600.16 T66 Bobcat Trade ($60,000.00) Total $5,600.16 Item #2 (F-Skid) Parks Department - Skid Loader S66 T4 Bobcat Skid Steer Loader $53,951.40 S66 Bobcat Trade ($48,000.00) Total $5,951.40 Item #3 (F-Skid) Streets Department - Skid Loader S76 T4 Bobcat Skid Steer Loader $54,701.16 S76 Bobcat Trade ($49,000.00) Total $5,701.16 Item #4 (F-Skid) Streets Department - Skid Loader S64 T4 Bobcat Skid Steer Loader $52,836.40 S64 Bobcat Trade ($48,000.00) Total $4,836.40 Item #5 (F-Skid) Utility Department - Annual Skid Loader Trade In (F-Skid) T770 T4 Bobcat Compact Track Loader $77,191.25 T770 Bobcat Trade ($69,000.00) Total $8,191.25 Total $30,280.37 Budget $28,000.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council authorization of the identified 2022 CIP equipment purchases. 377 ATTACHMENTS Resolution Approving 2022 Equipment Purchases Bobcat Quotes CIP F-Skid 378 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 13, 2022 RESOLUTION NO: 2022-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASES OF 2022 EQUIPMENT WHEREAS,the City manages a fleet of vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS,the approved 2022 Capital Improvement Plan includes the annual trade in of skid loaders; and WHEREAS,the City obtained quotes from a reputable dealer of the equipment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby authorizes the identified 2022 fleet purchases. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 13 th day of June, 2022. ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 379 380 381 382 383 384 Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2022 2026 thru Department Fleet - Capital Description The item would fund the annual trade in of skid loaders. Project #F-skid Priority n/a Justification Due to the state bid pricing, the City is able to trade our skid loaders annually on a price/hour cost, to a maximum number of hours. Trading in newer machines guarantees there will be no other expenses except oil changes and grease jobs because the machine will always have a warranty. This approach is also a better life cycle cost over keeping the machines for 15 years. There is no guarantee on the state bid pricing or the trade in price, so staff will be pricing annually to determine if it is a cost effective or if we should hold on to the machine for an extended period. Budget Impact/Other Useful LifeProject Name Annual Skid Loader Trade In Category PW - Streets Type Equipment Account #2 700-7025-4705 Account #1 400-1320-4705 Account #4 720-7025-4705 Account #3 701-7025-4705 Status Active Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Expenditures 140,00028,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000Equipment 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 140,000Total Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026Funding Sources 140,00028,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000Fleet Capital 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 140,000Total 385 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Resolution 2022-XX: Approve Settlement Agreement for Parcels 1 and 24 as part of CSAH 101 Improvement Project File No.ENG 14-08 Item No: D.8 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution approving a Settlement Agreement for Parcels 1 and 24 of the CSAH 101 Improvement Project." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Asset Management SUMMARY As part of the County Highway 101 project, eminent domain procedures are being used on various parcels along the corridor to feasibly allow for the construction of the highway improvements. The project is primarily funded from MnDOT turnback funds, State Bond proceeds, and County sources. The only funding responsibility of the City is for municipal sewer and watermain infrastructure. Council approval is necessary since we are the lead agency on the project. The City will be paying the settlement and getting reimbursed from the County. Approving the agreement eliminates the need to move forward with a Commissioners Hearing and potentially District Court proceedings, both of which incur additional time, expense, and additional risk for the project. 386 BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Settlement Agreement. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Settlement Agreement Right-of-Way Map 387 1 @BCL@100C18E5.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: ______________________RESOLUTION NO:________________ MOTION BY:__________________SECONDED BY:__________________ RESOLUTION APPROVING SETTELEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CSAH 101 PARCELS 1 & 24 WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen (“City”), having the power of eminent domain as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117, filed a petition in eminent domain proceedings and motion for early transfer of title and possession to acquire various interests in land in the City of Chanhassen for the reconstruction, expansion, and improvement of County State Aid Highway 101 from County State Aid Highway 14 (Pioneer Trail to County State Aid Highway 61 (Flying Cloud Drive) (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the Petition for the Project was filed on November 18, 2019, as a part of Carver County Court File No. 10-CV-19-1132 (the “Action”); and WHEREAS,to facilitate the Project, the Action included acquiring certain real property interests owned by PCH Development, LLC (the “Owner”)and as defined as Parcels 1and 24within the Action (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, subject to approval by the City Council, representatives of the parties have negotiated a Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, which resolves all outstanding claims and issues between the parties related to the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has fully considered the terms of the Settlement Agreement and has determined that it is in the best interests of the community to approve it as presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the above-referenced recitals are incorporated herein to this Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Settlement Agreement is hereby approved by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute all appropriate documents and take all necessary actions to facilitate the settlement contemplated herein, with all such actions to be in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Resolution and the incorporated Settlement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager of the City, staff and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to take any and all additional steps and actions necessary or convenient in order to accomplish the intent of this Resolution. 388 2 @BCL@100C18E5.docx Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of June, 2022. ATTEST: ________________________________________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 389 A-1 @BCL@100C18E5.docx EXHIBIT A The Settlement Agreement 390 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF CARVER The City of Chanhassen,a Minnesota municipal corporation, Petitioner, vs. PCH Development,LLC,et al, Respondents. IN DISTRICT COURT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type:Condemnation Court File No.10-CV-19-1132 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (Parcels 1 &24) THIS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement")is entered into between the City of Chanhassen,a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota (the "City");PCH Development,LLC (the "Owner");and Paws,Claws &Hooves Pet Boarding,LLC (the "Tenant")(together with the City referred to herein as the "Parties",or each a "Party"). Recitals A.The City,having the power of eminent domain as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117,filed a petition in eminent domain proceedings and motion for early transfer of title and possession to acquire various interests in land in the City of Chanhassen in the above-captioned matter for the reconstruction,expansion,and improvement of County State Aid Highway 101 from County State Aid Highway 14 (Pioneer Trail)to County State Aid Highway 61 (Flying Cloud Drive)(the "Project"). 1 DOC SOPE N-C HI3 5 -6 1 -8 0 0 0 4 2 .v 1 -5 /2 5 /2 2 391 B.At the time the petition was filed and on the date of taking,Owner was the owner in fee simple of those certain real properties located in Carver County and which are legally described in the attached Exhibit A (the "Properties"or "Parcels 1 and 24"in the above-captioned matter); and C.Paws,Claws &Hooves Pet Boarding,L L C,was named in the City's Petition as a T enant on the Propert ies. D.The U.S.Small Business Administration was named in the City's Petition as a M ort gagee,based upon a mort gage to T win Cities-M etr o Certifi ed Development Company dated September 19,1997,fil ed in the Office of the Carver County Recor der on October 9,1997,as Document Number 216874,and subsequently assigned to the U.S.Small Business Administration by Assignment dated September 19,1997,and fi led in the Office of the Carver County Recorder on October 9,1997,as Document Number 216875.This mort gage was satisfi ed and r eleased on or about M ay 26,2009. E .On January 13,2020,the Court fi led its Findings of Fact,Conclusions of L aw and Order Appr oving Petition and T ransfer of T itle and Possession,On January 31,2020,the Court fi led its Amended Findings of Fact,Conclusions of L aw,and Or der Approving Petition and T r ansfer of T itle and Possession (the "Order")in the above matter ,approving the City's acquisition of the inter ests in the Property and authori zed the City to obtain the early tr ansfer of title and possession of the Pr operty upon the City's payment to the Owners or deposit with the Court of the City's approved appraisal value for the Property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Section 117.042. F.On February 18,2020,pursuant to the Order ,the City deposited with the Court Administrator 's Office $1,383,000 which is the amount of the City's approved appr aised value for Parcels 1 and 24 (the "Quick Tak e Depos it"). 2 DOC SOPEN-C H1 3 5 -6 1 -8 0 0 0 4 2 .v 1 -5 /2 5 /2 2 392 G.On February 18,2020,the City filed said Order in the Office of the County Recor der/Registr ar of T itles for Carver County,as Document No.A691199,and fi led the Receipt of Deposit for the Properties in the Office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for Carver County, as Document No.A691201,thereby causing title and the ri ght to possession of the Pr operti es to pass to the City. H.The Parties have r eached an agreement on the total amount which the City will pay to the Owner in settlement of all claims which the Owner may have against the City r elated to the taking by the City of the Properties from the Owner in this matter ,including any r elocation claims,and the Parties her eby enter this Agreement to confi rm the terms and conditions of said agreement. Terms of th e Agreemen t NO W,THEREF O RE,in consideration of their mutual pr omises and other good and valuable cons ideration,the r ec eipt and sufficiency of which are her eby acknowledged,the Parties stipulate and agree as follows: 1.Recitals.The r ecitals set forth above are true and accurate and each are incorporated as materi al terms. 2.Settlement Amount.The Parties stipulate and agree to a global settlement and award of damages for the taking of the Propert ies in the amount of One Mi llion,Nine Hundred Fourteen Thousand Dollars and NO/100 ($1,914,000)(the "S ettlemen t Amou n t").L ess the quick take payment of $1,383,000,the unpaid balance of the Settlement Amount consists of $531,000 ("Un p aid Balan ce"),payable to the Owner as set forth in Section 3 below. 3.Payment.Within 15 bus iness days aft er execution of this Agreement,the City shall pay the Unpaid Balance of the Settlement Amount to the Owner by issuing a check in the name of 3 DOC SOPEN-C H1 3 5 -6 1 -8 0 0 0 4 2 .v1 -5 /2 5 /2 2 393 PCH Development,LLC and delivering it care of Larkin Hoffman,Attn:Rob Stefonowicz,8300 Norman Center Drive,Suite 1000,Minneapolis,MN 55437. 4 . 5. Other Considerations. a.No Appeal.In exchange for the Settlement Amount,the Parties agree not to appeal this Agreement,the Settlement Amount,any filings or orders in this matter to date,or the final certificate respecting the Properties. b.Property Condition.The Owner accepts the Properties in the condition it is in.Owner reserves the right to request completion of final restoration work (grading and seeding) on the Properties and,if requested,consents to performance of said work by the City's contractor upon the Properties. c.Mortgage.Owner represents and warrants that the mortgage held by the U.S.Small Business Administration has been satisfied and released. Full and Final Compromise.The terms and conditions of this Agreement constitute a full and final compromise of all matters in dispute with respect to the Properties and the Parties, including any and all relocation claims related to the Property.In consideration of the Settlement Payment and the other terms and conditions of this Agreement,Owner and Tenant waive any and all claims Owner or Tenant may have against the City in connection with this condemnation action, including without limitation,just compensation,statutory remedies,all severance damages,and any other damages,interest,taxes,expert fees,attorney fees,appraisal fees (including under Minnesota Statutes,Section 117.036)and costs and disbursements to which Owner or Tenant may otherwise be entitled.Owner and Tenant waive any and all rights to further notices,viewings,or hearings regarding this action,including without limitation,the right to participate or claim additional money at any commissioners'hearings held with the remaining parties within the condemnation action. 4 DOCSOPEN -CH13 5 -6 1-8 00042 .v 1-5/25/22 394 6.Condemnation Action.After this Agreement is executed and payment is issued,the City may file a Final Certificate and shall file a Discharge of Notice of Lis Pendens in this action with respect to the Properties.Each Party will bear its own costs in connection with this action.The district court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Agreement. 7.Entire Agreement.The undersigned state and represent that each has fully read this Agreement,and that each knows and understands its consequences and legal effect.The Agreement and the documents incorporated herein contain the entire agreement of the Parties regarding this matter. 8.Execution.The Parties agree that this Agreement may be executed in separate counterparts which,taken together,shall be and comprise one agreement. 9.Contingency.This Agreement is contingent upon approval of the City Council of the City of Chanhas s en. I 0.Authority.Any person signing this Agreement in a representative capacity represents and warrants by s igning this Agreement that it is the signer's intent to bind the principal being repres ented to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,that the s igner has been authorized to bind the principal to the terms and conditions ,and that it is the intent of the principal to be s o bound. IN WI TNE S S THERE OF,the undersigned have each executed this Agreement on the day and year s et forth below. {R emainder ofP age Intentionally Left B lank;Signature Pages to Follow} 5 DOC SOPEN-C H1 3 5 -6 1 -8 0 004 2 .v 1 -5 /2 5 /2 2 395 pate4:B />f ,2 0 22 {Signa ture Pag e for Owner an d Tena n t} OWNER: PCH DEVELOPMENT,LLC TENANT: PAWS,CLAWS &HOOVES PET BOARDING,LLC »s :15/1 ,2 0 »» es l 4\,2 0 2 2 LARKIN HOFFMAN 1) ,Su ite 10 0 0 Min n eap olis,MN 554 37 (9 5 2 )8 3 5 -3 8 0 0 A TTORNEY FOR OWNER AND TENANT 6 DOC SOPEN-C H13 5 -6 1-80 0042 .v 1-5/25/22 396 7 DOCSOPEN-CH135-61-759027.v1-11/2/21 {Signature Page for the City} Dated: _______________, 2022 CITY OF CHANHASSEN ________________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor ________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Dated: May 31, 2022 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED s/ Joshua P. Weir Joshua P. Weir (#0402328) Fifth Street Towers 150 South 5th Street, Ste. 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER CITY OF CHANHASSEN 397 EXHIBIT A CSA1 191_Reconstruction-Pioneer Trail to CSAH 61 Parcels 1 and 24 Property Tax Identificatio n No.25 .60 1-0020 25 .60 1-0 0 10 25.601-0030 Property Address:10500 and 10520 Great Plains Boulevard,Chaska,Minnesota 55318 Property:Abstract Legal Description of Subject Property: Lots 1 and 2,Block 1,and Outlot A,PAWS CLAWS AND HOOVES ADDITION,Carver County, Minnesota. Leg al Description of Portion of Subject Property to Be_Acquired in Fee: Parcels IA,lB,1 C,1D and Parcel 24,all as shown on CARVER COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT No.29,on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder,Carver County,Minnesota, containing a total of 201,466 square feet,more or less. Description of Po rtion of Subject Property to Be Encumbered Herein by Temporary Easement for Co nstruction Purposes:; Temporary Easement Parcels 1 C and 1D,forming and being a part of Parcel 1,as shown on CARVER COUNTY RIGHT OF WAY PLAT No.29,on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Carver County,Minnesota,containing a total of 88,649 square feet,more or less. Term of Tempo ra ry Easement: The temporary easement tract will expire on December 31,2021. Respo ndents In terests PCH Development,LLC,a Minnesota limited Fee Owner liability company U.S .S mall Bus ines s Adminis tration Mortgagee P aws ,Claws &Hooves P et Boarding,LLC,a Tenant Minnes ota limited liability company City of Chanhass en S pecial Ass es s ments ,if any All other parties unknown,together with Any right,title or interes t within the unknown s ucces s ors,as s igns ,heirs,devis ees acquired portion of the S ubject Property and s pous es ,if any 4890-1139-5362,v.1 A-1 DOCSOPEN-CH135-61-759027.v1-11/2/2I DOCSOPEN-CH135-61-800042.v1-5/25/22 398 399 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Resolution 2022-XX: Accept Donation from CenterPoint Energy for the Purchase of Replacement Ice Rescue Equipment File No.Item No: D.9 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts a resolution accepting a donation from CenterPoint Energy for the purposes of replacing specialized ice rescue equipment." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND CenterPoint Energy accepts grant applications on an annual basis through the Community Safety Grant Program. The City of Chanhassen has submitted and been awarded these grants in past years. Previous projects have included gas monitoring equipment and thermal imaging technology. This year we are utilizing the grant to replace four (4) ice rescue suits which are considered specialized rescue equipment. This equipment is over ten years old and degrades over time. The equipment is used seasonally in either a boat for water rescue or in our equipment utilized to respond to ice related rescue calls. DISCUSSION 400 BUDGET The total equipment purchase is $3,078.76. The grant is a 50% matching grant which will provide $1,500 towards the total purchase. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends accepting the donation of $1,500 in the form of a grant from CenterPoint Energy to purchase the new equipment. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Community Safety Grant Application Guidelines Grant Award Email 401 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 13, 202221 RESOLUTION NO:2022-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION OF $1,500 FROM CENTERPOINT ENERGY TO PURCHASE REPLACEMENT ICE RESCUE EQUIPMENT FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, CenterPoint Energy accepts grant applications on an annual basis through the Community Safety Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen has submitted and been awarded these grants in past years, which have included gas monitoring equipment and thermal imaging technology; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Fire Department needs to replace four ice rescue suits which are considered specialized rescue equipment; and WHEREAS, this specialized rescue equipment is used seasonally in either a boat for water rescue or in our equipment utilized to respond to ice-related rescue calls; and WHEREAS, this equipment is over ten years old and degrades over time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby accepts a grant in the amount of $1,500 from the CenterPoint Energyto purchase replacement ice rescue equipment for the Fire Department. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 13 th day of June, 2022. ATTEST: Elise Ryan, Mayor Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk YES NO ABSENT 402 Community Safety Grant CNP 1304 (1-2022) Page 1 of 2 2022 Guidelines CenterPoint Energy offers matching grants to cities served by the company through the Community Safety Grant Program. In 2022, the program will award grants up to $2,500, giving priority to applications focusing on safety equipment or safety-related projects. Priority will be given to franchised cities that have not received a grant in the last year. CRITERIA Eligibility Proposed equipment or special project must be initiated or sanctioned by a city served by CenterPoint Energy. Each application must be signed by the City Manager, Administrator or Clerk. We will only accept one request from each city. Number and amount of grants The company will award grants up to a maximum amount of $2,500 until the 2022 funds are depleted. The funding request cannot exceed 50 percent of the total equipment or project cost. Eligible projects The equipment or project must be used for safety initiatives in the community. Grant program funds will be used to leverage local funds. Examples of eligible safety equipment include: Multi-gas breathing apparatus Fire fighting equipment Thermal imaging cameras Extraction tools Self-contained breathing apparatus Line locating equipment Portable positive pressure oxygen kit Specialized rescue vehicles and equipment Emergency communication equipment Defibrillators Civil defense outdoor warning sirens Traffic control equipment Exclusions Supplemental, routine and/or ongoing city budget expenses Body cameras Law enforcement weapons or restraints Events Memorials • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • HOW TO APPLY Complete application on page 2 and email to: SafetyGrants@CenterPointEnergy.com If you have questions contact: Beth Brown at 612-321-4899. Timeline May 6: Grant applications due Week of May 23: Notification of grant status to cities June-August: Check mailed or deliveries scheduled and completed NOTE: All grants are at the sole discretion of CenterPoint Energy. 403 Community Safety Grant Application Applicant city City Hall address ZIP code Requestor name Title Phone Fax Email address What equipment or special project are you asking us to help fund? Equipment/special project description (brief) Total equipment/special project cost $ Amount of funding request $(Maximum is $2,500. Funding request cannot exceed 50 percent of total equipment/project cost.) How will your request benefit the community? Signature (required) Administrator, manager or clerk (print name)Signature Title Date Email application to: SafetyGrants@CenterPointEnergy.com Questions? Contact: Beth Brown 612-321-4899 CNP 1304 (1-2022) Page 2 of 2 404 1 Johnson, Don From:Johnson, Don Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2022 1:51 PM To:Brown, Beth A Cc:Hokkanen, Laurie Subject:RE: CenterPoint Energy Community Safety Grant Hi Beth, That’s awesome. Thank you so much. Due to the amount, I will run this through our council to accept. Would you like to attend the council meeting when I schedule it? Don Johnson Fire Chief City of Chanhassen Office 952-227-1152 Cell 952-607-7244 From: Brown, Beth A <beth.brown@centerpointenergy.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 1:37 PM To: Johnson, Don <djohnson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: CenterPoint Energy Community Safety Grant Don Johnson, Fire Chief Dear Don, Thank you for applying for a CenterPoint Energy Community Safety Grant. We are pleased to inform you that a grant in the amount of $1500 has been awarded to the City of Chanhassen for your request for Ice Commander Suits for water & ice rescue. The check will be mailed to the address as listed on the application (shown below): City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317 I have sent this email only to the contact noted on the application. Please feel free to share it as you see fit. Congratulations and thank you for making safety a top priority in your community. Sincerely, 405 2 Beth Brown Specialist | Community Relations People & Business Solutions 612.321.4899 w. | 507.317.6009 c. CenterPointEnergy.com 406 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Ordinance XXX: Adopt Amendments to City Code Chapter 13, Nuisances, and Chapter 20, Zoning File No.Item No: D.10 Agenda Section CONSENT AGENDA Prepared By MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner Reviewed By Laurie Hokkanen SUGGESTED ACTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts an ordinance amending Chapter 13, Nuisances, and Chapter 20, Zoning, of the Chanhassen City Code; and approves the summary ordinance for publication." Motion Type 4/5 Vote Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY City staff routinely reviews the City Code in an effort to identify and correct obsolete, conflicting, confusing, or otherwise problematic provisions. Typically these proposals are fairly technical in nature with a minimal impact to how the City Code actual impacts residents; however, several of the amendments included in this item do impact what is permitted on a property or represent a new rule. In all cases, staff will note in summary discussions below the nature and impact of the amendment. An issue paper discussing each proposed amendment is attached, as are the summary minutes from the May 17, 2022 Planning Commission meeting. BACKGROUND On May 17, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the items amending Chapter 20. No members of the public attended or submitted comments for or against any of the proposed 407 amendments. A summary of the Planning Commission's comments will be provided in the item-specific discussion below. DISCUSSION Cantilever (Clarify existing policy; remove unnecessary permit) The City Code allows various elements of buildings to encroach specified distances into required yard setbacks; however, cantilevers are not explicitly included in the list of permitted encroachments. Staff has always ruled that they fall under the category of “other architectural features” and that the two-foot, six-inch encroachment allowed under this section is cumulative (i.e. a property with a two-foot, six-inch cantilever within a required yard setback is not also entitled to an additional two-foot, six-inch eave). It would be beneficial to codify this policy in the Code as there have been instances where contractors operating under the assumption that cantilevers are exempt from required yard setbacks have submitted designs that exceed the permitted encroachments. This section of the Code also notes that other canopies may be permitted by a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Staff is also proposing removing that sentence. Since canopies are addressed in the first sentence, it is not clear what these other canopies would be and, in any event, the appropriate mechanism for requesting a deviation from required setbacks would be a variance, not a CUP. Commission Comments: The Planning Commission asked if these applied to all setbacks. Staff clarified that these only apply to yard setbacks. They also asked why this was being proposed. Staff responded that both are actual problems that have arisen as well as removing an unnecessary permit requirement that staff had discovered. Fences (Alters permitted placement of some fences; removes confusing/conflicting provisions) The portion of the City Code that regulates fences has several problematic sections: 1. It requires building permits for fences over 6.5 feet in height; however, the State Building Code only requires building permits for fences over 7 feet in height. 2. It permits fences up to 3.5 feet in height to be constructed within the shoreland setback of riparian properties; however, the shoreland ordinance prohibits the placement of structures, except Water- Oriented Accessory Structures, within those setbacks. 3. It requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for fences over 6.5 feet in height; however, the appropriate mechanism for granting a height deviation is a variance. This requirement also conflicts with another section allowing non-residential fences to be up to 8 feet tall without a CUP. 4. Fences within the front yard of corner/double frontage lots are held to more restrictive standards than other front yard fences. 5. The definition of sight distance triangle used in the fence ordinance does not include driveways. 6. States the front yard on corner/double frontage lots is determined by the garage; however, garage orientation does not always align with street access. 7. States barbed wire and electric fences are permitted in agricultural districts; however, does not require that properties are actually being used for agriculture. 8. Prohibits placement of fences between landscape buffers and arterial/collector streets, but does not take into account actual location of the vegetation within the buffer. Staff believes these issues are best addressed by amending the fence ordinance to require building permits for fences over 7 feet in height, prohibit fences within the shoreland setback, remove the CUP 408 requirement for fences over 6.5 feet in height, adopt the same height standard for all front yard fences, require fences in both street and driveway sight distance triangles to abide by front yard fence heights, clarify that the front yard is determine by the property’s access to the public right-of-way, clarify that barbed wire and electric fences are only permitted on properties being used for agriculture, and clarify that fences must be behind the landscaping approved in a subdivision’s landscape plan. These changes should improve the consistency and intelligibility of the City’s fence ordinance. Commission Comments: The Planning Commission asked if the proposed amendments would alter how staff treated/defined open/opaque fencing. Staff clarified that it would not. They asked if fences were considered structures. Staff replied that they were. They discussed how the City currently treated fences in the shoreland district and how prohibiting fences within the shoreland setback could impact riparian properties. Accessory Structures (Limits number of stories; removes confusion) The City Code limits both the height and number of stories for accessory structures in all residential districts, with the exception of the Single-Family Residential (RSF) District where the maximum number of stories an accessory structure is permitted is not specified. This leads to confusion as to whether or not residents in the RSF District can build two-story detached structures. One- and two-story accessory structures tend to have different designs, uses, and impacts on surrounding parcels. Due to the higher potential for two-story accessory structures to adversely impact surrounding properties, staff believes accessory structures in the RSF District should be limited to a single story. This limit would be consistent with the limit placed on accessory structures in the other non-large lot residential districts. Commission Comments: The Planning Commission asked if staff’s concerns about home occupations and associated impacts were theoretical or based on actual complaints. Staff responded that there are typically several complaints each year about home occupations being run out of garages. Concern was expressed over how clearly defined stories are in the City Code and the potential for gray area in terms of determining if a second story was present or not. The Commission recommended that staff consider adopting a clearer definition of story. They also received confirmation that existing structures would become legal nonconforming and that variances could be issued from this standard. Design Standards (Removes prohibition; increases flexibility) The City Code prohibits the use of painted concrete, brick, and block on visible exterior portions of commercial, industrial, and office-institutional buildings. The prohibition was adopted due to the fact that the City had several poorly-maintained buildings where issues with peeling and chipping paint were not being addressed. At the time the City’s design standards were adopted, the general consensus was that the maintenance requirements of painted surfaces created a risk of unattractive facades and, thus, painted surfaces should be restricted to non-visible or accent elements. Staff believes that modern paints are much better at withstanding Minnesota’s weather and adhering to concrete, brick, and block. Additionally, since painting does not require a permit, several buildings have painted portions of their concrete, brick, and/or block facades in the years after they have received their original site plan approvals and staff has not observed the type of maintenance issues that were the impetus of the ordinance’s prohibition. For these reasons, staff believes the City’s design standards should be amended to remove the prohibition on painting. Commission Comments: The Planning Commission asked how staff could ensure quality materials are used. Staff noted that other provisions in the design standards would allow staff to review the proposed materials and make 409 sure they are adequate. Restaurants in Neighborhood Business (BN) District (Removes unnecessary permit requirement) The Neighborhood Business (BN) District is intended to be located near residential neighborhoods and to accommodate neighborhood scale commercial uses. For this reason, it is the most restrictive of the City’s commercial districts. Currently, one area of the City is zoned BN and five Planned Unit Developments (PUD) use the BN zoning as their underlying zoning standard. While the base BN zoning classifies restaurants as conditional uses, all of the PUDs list them as a permitted use. To date, no restaurant located in a BN District or PUD with BN as the underlying zoning has caused a complaint. Given the fact that Conditional Use Permits (CUP) require a public hearing and City Council approval, staff believes the requirement creates an unnecessary barrier and delay for restaurants looking to locate in this zoning district. Commission Comments: Clarified that a bar would not be permitted. The Planning Commission inquired as to the possibility of rezoning the location. Staff explained the rationale for the neighborhood business district zoning and noted that rezoning typically only occurred in response to a specific request. Screening for Residential Districts (Updates Code to incorporate newer zoning districts) On May 24, 2004, the City Council passed a major amendment to the City’s Zoning Code which removed the A1 District and established the RLM District. Several sections within the City’s landscaping ordinance were not amended to remove references to the A1 District and incorporate the new RLM District. Ambiguity is also present within the ordinance due to the use of the term single- family development. Under the City’s definitions, twin homes are single-family developments. It is not clear if the intention is to require a buffer solely at the density threshold of four units an acre or whenever smaller lots or attached homes are present. Additionally, for reasons that are not clear, the verbiage of a section of the Code pertaining to Single-Family Residential Districts was changed from “article” to “ordinance”. This change was not the result of a Code amendment and creates a potential for confusion. Staff recommends that the Code be amended to remove references to the A1 District, add references to the RLM District where appropriate, require buffers between low and medium/high density residential developments, and restore the use of the word “article”. Commission Comments: The Planning Commission clarified how buffers are determined and calculated, as well as how staff ensured the plantings survived. The Planning Commission clarified the difference between the proposed alternatives. Staff explained one makes a break between detached and attached, the other multi-family and single-family, and the third just makes all landscaping based on land use guidance. Appeal Deadline (Establish timeline for court appeals) The City Code establishes the processes and timelines for appealing zoning decisions by the Board of Adjustments and Appeals (Planning Commission) to the City Council, but does not address appealing decisions of the City Council. Zoning decisions made by the City Council can be appealed through the district courts; however, the City Code does not establish a timeframe for appealing those decisions. Recently, courts in Minnesota upheld a statute in another city that required individuals wishing to appeal a zoning decision to make that appeal within 30 days of the decision in question. The City Attorney has recommended that the City of Chanhassen adopt a similar provision in order to ensure the timeliness of any appeals. Commission Comments: The Planning Commission clarified the scope of the amendment, i.e. only decision under Chapter 20, 410 and asked what the current limit is. Staff noted that without this provision it is ambiguous as to when the Courts would or would not accept an appeal. Light Nuisance (Aligns light trespass with other light nuisances) The City’s nuisance ordinance establishes a standard for light trespass that the City has no practical means of measuring. Additionally, staff believes that the established standard is low enough that many lights typically present on residential properties likely exceed the limits stipulated in the ordinance. Other sections of the nuisance light ordinance use the general standard of “cause discomfort or annoyance” rather than establishing a specific foot-candle threshold for the light. Staff believes that the light trespass section should be amended to replace the foot-candle standard with the general language used for the other forms of nuisance light. This will allow staff to respond to light trespass complaints without attempting to establish the foot candles present four feet from the ground at the property line and by taking into account unique features of the properties in question. Note: No public hearing was required for this item as it does not amend Chapter 18 or 20. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt the proposed Code amendments. ATTACHMENTS Summary of Ordinances Omnibus Ordinance Cantilever Issue Paper Fences Issue Paper RSF Accessory Height Issue Paper Painting Prohibition Issue Paper BN Restaurants Issue Paper Landscape Buffer Issue Paper Sec. 20-1176 - Bufferyards Appeal Deadline Issue Paper Nuisance Light Issue Paper Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated May 17, 2022 411 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13, NUISANCES, AND CHAPTER 20, ZONING, OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE The purpose of these Code amendments are as follows: Amend Section 13-2(c)(24) replace foot candle standard with discomfort or annoyance standard for determining nuisance light trespass. Amend Sections 20-1 and 20-29 to establish 30-day appeal deadline for zoning decisions. Amend Sections 20-91(a)(6), 20-1016, 20-1017, 20-1019, 20-1022, 20-1023, and 20- 1024 to clarify the intent, permitting requirements, height limits, location limits, and other regulations governing fences. Amend Section 20-615(h)(2) to stipulate a maximum height of one story for accessory structures in the RSF district. Amend Sections 20-692 and 20-694 to change restaurants without drive-through windows from a conditional to a permitted use in the BN district. Amend Section 20-908(e)(1) to clarify permitted yard encroachments and their treatment. Amend Section 20-1065 to remove the prohibition on painted brick, block, rock and concrete. Amend Sections 20-1176(b) and 20-1180(b)(2) to remove A1 district from, add RLM district to, and clarify the application of residential landscaping and screening standards. A printed copy of Ordinance No. XXX is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Manager/Clerk. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION this 13th day of June, 2022, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on [insert date]) g:\plan\city code\2022\2022-04 various - 05-17-22\attachment 2 summary of ordinances_june.docx 412 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13, NUISANCES, AND CHAPTER 20, ZONING, OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 13-2(c)(24) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (24) Nuisance light on residential properties. a. Definitions. In this section: 1. Direct glare means an excessive brightness contrast producing a sensation of visual discomfort resulting from insufficiently shielded light source in the field of view. 2. Intermittent light means any artificial light which flashes, revolves or fluctuates in such a manner that the variance is easily distinguished by personal observation. 3. Light source means a device (such as a lamp) which provides visible energy. 4. Light trespass means light emitted that is visible beyond the boundaries of the property on which the light source is located. 5. Person means an individual, firm, partnership, trustee, agent, association, corporation, company, governmental agency, club or organization of any kind. b. Direct glare and light trespass declared a nuisance. Glare, light trespass and intermittent artificial light impacting on residential properties between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., which cause loss of enjoyment, comfort or repose, and use of such properties as determined under subsection 13-2(24)c. of this section is declared a nuisance. c. Nuisance determined. 1. Light trespass shall be considered a nuisance when it impacts upon another residential property with such intensity as to cause discomfort or annoyance. 2. Direct glare shall be considered a nuisance when an artificial light source has not been properly located, shielded, directed or controlled, and as a result there is a direct line of sight between the light source or its reflection and a point five feet above the ground or higher at the property line of other residential property if such intensity causes discomfort or annoyance. 3. Intermittent light shall be considered a nuisance when it impacts upon a habitable area or other residential property with such intensity and variance as to cause discomfort or annoyance. d. Production of light nuisance prohibited. No artificial light source shall be installed, allowed to be installed or permitted on any property which light sources is an intermittent light source, or due to its intensity or physical characteristics, causes direct glare or trespasses onto a residential property in such a manner as to cause a nuisance during the hours of 11:00 p.m. through 7:00 a.m. e. Responsibility. It shall be the responsibility of every installer of artificial lights and every owner or occupant of property on which artificial lights are installed to comply with subsection 13-2(24)d. of this section. 413 2 f. Exemptions. The provisions of subsections 13-2(24)d. and e. of this section shall not apply where: 1. Such lights are caused to be installed by the federal, state or local government or agency, to light public ways or areas for public benefit; or 2. Such lights are required by law for safety reasons and there is no practical way to control them to eliminate the nuisance. Section 2. Section 20-1 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec 20-1 Decision of the Council All decisions by the City involving an approval under this chapter shall be final, except that any aggrieved person or persons shall have the right to appeal within thirty (30) days of the decision to the Carver or Hennepin County District Court. Any person seeking judicial review must serve the City and all necessary parties, including any landowners, within the thirty (30) day period defined above. Section 3. The Chanhassen City Code is amended to add Section 20-29 to read as follows: (g) Decision of the Council. All decisions by the City involving a variance or appeal shall be final, except that any aggrieved person or persons shall have the right to appeal within thirty (30) days of the decision to the Carver or Hennepin County District Court. Any person seeking judicial review must serve the City and all necessary parties, including any landowners, within the thirty (30) day period defined above. Section 4. Section 20-91(a)(6) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (6) Permanent fences less than seven feet in height. Section 5. Section 20-615(h)(2) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (2) For accessory structures, one story/20 feet. Section 6. The Chanhassen City Code is amended to add Section 20-692(p) to read as follows: (p) Restaurants without drive-through facilities. Section 7. Section 20-694 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-694 Conditional Uses The following are conditional uses in a "BN" District: (a) Bed and breakfast establishments. (b) Convenience store with gas pumps. (c) Banks with drive-through facilities. (d) Reserved. (e) Motor fuel station. 414 3 (f) Reserved. (g) Reserved. Section 8. Section 20-908(e)(1) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (1) Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line, cornices, canopies, eaves, cantilevers, or other architectural features may project a distance not exceeding two feet, six inches; fire escapes may project a distance not exceeding four feet, six inches; an uncovered stair and necessary landings may project a distance not to exceed six feet, provided such stair and landing shall not extend above the entrance floor of the building; bay windows, balconies, open porches and chimneys may project a distance not exceeding three feet; unenclosed decks and patios may project a distance not exceeding five feet. The encroachments listed in this paragraph cannot be applied cumulatively (i.e. the edge of the roof of an open porch may project three feet into a required setback, its eaves are not entitled to an additional two feet, six inches of encroachment). Section 9. Section 20-1016 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-1016. – Intent. The intent of this division is to provide standards for fences along the perimeter of lots that may be decorative or act as boundaries and/or barriers. Section 10. Section 20-1017 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-1017. - Permit A zoning permit shall be obtained for any permanent fence installed for any purpose, other than an agricultural purpose prior to installation of same. The installation of temporary or seasonal fencing, e.g., snow fencing, garden fencing, etc., without permanent posts is exempt from this requirement. A site plan showing the location of the fence shall be submitted with the permit application. The City may require a permit applicant to provide a registered land survey establishing property lines. A building permit, in lieu of a zoning permit, shall be required for fences in excess of seven feet in height and retaining walls in excess of four feet in height. Section 11. Section 20-1019 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (a) Generally. All fences and retaining walls shall be located entirely upon the property of the fence or retaining wall owner unless the owner of the adjoining property agrees, in writing, that said fence or retaining wall may be erected on the property line of the respective properties. Such agreement shall be submitted at the time of building permit application. Encroachment into a City easement shall require an encroachment agreement between the property owner and the City. Fences shall not be placed within the public right-of-way. (b) Wetlands. No fences shall be permitted below the ordinary high water mark of a wetland or within the required wetland buffer area. 415 4 (c) Landscape Buffers. No fences shall be permitted between the landscaping approved in a subdivision’s landscape plan within a required landscape buffer and a collector or arterial street. (d) Temporary Fences. Temporary fencing, such as fencing installed to enclose a seasonal garden or snow fencing in winter, may not be located within the front yard setback. Snow fencing shall not be located within any drainage or utility easement. (e) Bluffs. No fences shall be permitted within the 30-foot bluff setback. (f) Shoreline Fences. No fences shall be permitted within the structure setback from the ordinary high water mark stipulated in Section 20-481. Section 12. Section 20-1022 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-1022. - Reserved. Section 13. Section 20-1023 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-1023. - Reserved. Residential fences are limited to six and one-half feet in height. The fence height is measured from grade to the highest point on the fence. All other residential fences shall meet the following standards: (a) Side yards and rear yards. In any side or rear yard on lots, the height of fences shall not exceed six and one-half feet. (b) Front yards. Fences in the required front yard setback area that are opaque shall not exceed three feet in height. Chain link fences in this area shall not exceed four feet in height. All other open fences in this area shall not exceed six and one-half feet in height. (c) Corner or double fronted lots. In addition to the other provisions contained in this section, fences located on corner or double fronted lots shall be subject to the following provisions: (1) Any fence within the required front yard setback area shall not exceed three feet in height if opaque construction, four feet if chain link, or six and one-half feet in height if open construction. (2) The maximum height of a fence shall conform to the requirements of fences in front yards within the sight distance triangle of street intersections and neighboring driveways. (3) The front yard shall be determined by the location of the property’s access by a driveway to the public street. Section 12. Section 20-1024 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-1024. - Barbed wire and electric fences. 416 5 Barbed wire and electric fences are prohibited in all residential districts. Barbed wire and electric fences are permitted on properties being used for agriculture. Section 15. Section 20-1065 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-1065 Material And Detail All manmade architectural, landscape, and paving materials shall reflect the highest quality possible and should be used in a manner suitable to the nature of the material, its role in the design, general durability, expected level of use or abuse, weathering characteristics, and ease and frequency of maintenance. The following materials or equivalent materials are acceptable: (a) Brick (b) Stone (c) Glass (d) Textured masonry units (e) Wood, consisting of lap siding with an exposure no greater than seven inches or wood shakes; surfaces must be painted (f) Stucco (g) Tilt up concrete panels that are grid or brick like in appearance Accent material may occupy up to 15 percent of the building's facade. These may include metal, glass block, spandrel glass or similar materials approved by the City. The following may not be used in any visible exterior application except when specifically permitted by the City in areas with limited public view or accent areas: 417 6 (a) Plain poured concrete panels "cast in place" (b) Reserved (c) Reserved (d) Reserved (e) Unadorned plain concrete block (f) Tilt-up concrete panels that are ribbed or corduroy in appearance (g) Prefabricated steel or sheet metal panels (h) Reflective glass (i) Aluminum, vinyl, fiberglass, asphalt or fiberboard siding (j) EIFS (exterior insulation and finish system) may be used as an accent but not a primary material Section 16. Section 20-1176(b) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (b) Except for buffer yard requirements specified in subsection 20-1176(f) below, this article does not apply to single-family developments in A2, RR, RSF, RLM and R4 zoning districts which are regulated by landscaping requirements contained in the subdivision ordinance (Chapter 18). Section 17. Section 20-1180(b)(2) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (2) Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto located in any RLM, R8, R12, R16, or Planned Unit Development district containing residential development at densities exceeding four units per acre shall be screened from lots located in any R4, A2, RR or RSF district. Section 18. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 2022 by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor (Summary Ordinance XXX published in the Chanhassen Villager on [Insert Date]) g:\plan\city code\2022\2022-04 various - 05-17-22\attachment 1 omnibus ordinance_june.docx 418 CITY OT CHANHASSXN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner May 17,2022 Cantilevers PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 20, yard regulations." Cantilevers are not explicitly addressed in the City Code which has caused some issues when contractors have attempted to use cantilevers to encroach into required setbacks. Summary: The City code allows various elements ofbuildings to encroach specified distances into required yard setbacks; however, cantilevers are not explicitly included in the list ofpermitted encroachments. Staff has always ruled that they fall under the category of"other architectural features" and that the two-foot, six-inch encroachments allowed under this section are not cumulative (i.e. a property with a two-foot, six-inch cantilever within a required yard setback is not also entitled to an additional two-foot, six-inch eave). It would be beneficial to codifu this policy in the Code, as there have been instances where contractors operating under the assumption that cantilevers are exempt from required yard setbacks have submitted designs that exceed the permitted encroachments. This section ofthe Code also notes that other canopies may be permitted by a conditional use permit (CUP). Staff is also proposing removing that sentence. Since canopies are addressed in the first sentence, it is not clear what these other canopies would be and, in any event, the appropriate mechanism for requesting a deviation from required setbacks would be a variance not a conditional use permit. Section 20-908(e) lists the architectural elements that may project into required yard setbacks. PH 952.227.1 I 00 . www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us . Fx 952.227.111 0 1]OO I'IARKEI BOUTEVARD .PO BOX I4T.CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 Issue: Relevant Citv Code: 419 Cantilevers May 17,2022 Page 2 Analvsis: Issue I : Cantilevers The City allows various architectural features ofbuildings to encroach limited distances into required yard setbacks. Many common features like eaves, bay windows, and chimneys are explicitly called out in the City Code and general categories like "other architectural features" are included in the list of encroachments to accommodate less common elements. One common element that is not explicitly addressed are cantilevers. While staff has always considered cantilevers to fall into the category of "other architectural features", the fact that they are not explicitly mentioned means that some contractors have assumed that either they are not permitted to encroach into required yard setbacks or that they are completely exempt from required yard setbacks. When the later happens potentially costly redesigns are needed to bring submitted plans into line with Code, and residents and contractors become frustrated because a proposal they had believed met Code and would be allowed has been rejected. As older homes on the City's substandard lots are replaced and updated this has become an increasingly common issue, since residents and their builders tend to want to maximize the amount of living space that they can place on these lots without risking the uncertainty and delays ofthe variance process. Staff believes that by explicitly calling out cantilevers in the list of allowed encroachments, the number of proposals featuring large cantilevers within required setbacks can be reduced and that when they are submitted and must be altered, staff will have unambitious language within the City Code to reference. In addition to clarifuing the encroachment that cantilevers are permitted, this section of the City Code should also be updated to note that the permitted encroachments are not cumulative and cannot be built onto each other, i.e. a cantilever that projects two feet, six inches cannot also have a chimney that projects three feet with eaves that project two feet, six inches for a total encroachment ofeight feet. The reasons for explicitly stating this policy are essentially the same as those for including cantilevers in the list of permitted encroachments, i.e. increased transparency and clarity reduces the chances for misunderstandings and frustration. Issue 2: Canopies by CUP The opening clause ofSec. 20-908(e)(l) reads "Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line, comices, canopies, eaves, and other architectural features may project a distance not exceeding two feet, six inches;" and the last sentence of this section reads "Other canopies may be permitted by conditional use permit". Since "canopies" are an inclusive category govemed by the opening clause, it is unclear what would fall under the category of "other canopies". Ifan element that did not frt into any ofthe various broad categories, which includes "other architectural features", were proposed, staff believes the best method for determining the permitted extent of its encroachment into a required yard setback would be the variance process. Variances have a higher degree ofdiscretion than CUPs, do not necessarily require City Council review, and are the mechanism by which encroachments into 420 Cantilevers May 17,2022 Page 3 required setbacks arc typically $anted. Within residential districts, CUPs are gpically reserved for uses such as recreation beach lots or churches that are allowable so long as various criteria are met to ensure they do not negatively impact surrounding parcels, rather than for architectural features ofa permitted use that deviate for the required setbacks ofthe zoning code. l. No Change. 2. Add cantilevers to the list of pennitted encroachments, clarifr that the encroachment is no1 cumulative, and remove the language referring to conditional uses perrnits. Recommendation: Staff recommends Alternative 2. The proposed ordinance would read as follows: Sec 20-908(e)(1) 1) Into any required front yard, or required side yard adjoining a side street lot line, comices, canopies, eaves, cantilevers, or other architectural features may project a distance not exceeding two feet, six inches; fire escapes may project a distance not exceeding four feet, six inches; an uncovered stair and necessary landings may project a distance not to exceed six feet, provided such stair and landing shall not extend above the entrance floor of the building; bay windows, balconies, open porches and chimneys may project a distance not exceeding three feet; unenclosed decks and patios may project a distance not exceeding five feet. The encroachments listed in this paragraph cannot be applied cumulatively (i.e. the edge ofthe roof of an open porch may project three feet into a required setback, its eaves are not entitled to an additional two feet, six inches of encroachment). Alternatives: 421 CITY OT CIIAI'IIIASSXN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner May 17,2022 Clarifi Division Conceming Fences FROM: SUBJ: PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopts the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 20 conceming fences." Several sections ofthe division of the City Code regulating fencing should be amended to increase clarity and ensure consistency. Summarv: The portion of the City Code that regulates fences has several problematic sections: 1) It requires building permits for fences over 6.5 feet in height; however, the State Building Code only requires building permits for fences over 7 feet in height. 2) It permits fences up to 3 . 5 feet in height to be constructed within the shoreland setback of riparian properties; however, the shoreland ordinance prohibits the placement of structures, except Water Oriented Accessory Structures (WOAS), within those setbacks. 3) It requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for fences over 6.5 feet in height; however, the appropriate mechanism for granting a height deviation is a variance. This requirement also conflicts with another section allowing non-residential fences to be up to 8 feet tall without a CUP. 4) Fences within the front yard of comer/double frontage lots are held to more restrictive standards than other front yard fences. 5) The definition of sight distance triangle used in the fence ordinance does not include driveways. 6) States the front yard on comer/double frontage lots is determined by the garage; however, garage orientation does not always align with street access. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 DATE: TO: Issue: 77OO IYARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I47 . CHANHASSEN .I4INNESOTA 55317 422 Clarifr Division Concerning Fences May 17,2022 Page 2 7) States barbed wire and electric fences are permitted in agricultural districts; however, it does not require that properties are actually being used for agriculture. 8) Prohibits placement of fences between landscape buffers and arterial/collector streets, but does not take into account the actual location ofthe vegetation within the buffer. Staffbelieves these issues are best addressed by amending the fence ordinance to require building permits for fences over 7 feet in height, prohibit fences within the shoreland setback, remove the CUP requirement for fences over 6.5 feet in height, adopt the same height standard for all front yard fences, require fences in both street and driveway sight distance triangles to abide by front yard fence heights, clarify that the front yard is determine by the property's access to the public right ofway, clarify that barbed wire and electric fences are only permitted on properties being used for agricultwe, and clarify that fences must be behind the landscaping approved in a subdivision's landscape plan. These changes should improve the consistency and intelligibility of the City's fence ordinance. Relevant Citv Code: Section l-2. Rules of Construction and definitions - Defines term agriculture as commercial use of land for animal or food production. Section 20-91. Zoning Permits. Lists activities that require a zoning permit Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 5 - Fences and Walls - Contains permitting, height, location, and design requirements for all permanent and temporary fences within the city. Analysis: Issue 1: Permils The City Code states that a fence over 6.5 feet in height requires a building permit; however the Minnesota State building code only requires building permits for fences over 7 feet in height. The City Code cannot require a building permit when the State Code does not, so this discrepancy should be reconciled so that fences below 7 feet in height require a zoning permit and fences over 7 feet require a building permit. The section of the City Code that govems zoning permits will also need to be updated to reflect this change. The fence ordinance states that shoreline fences are limited to a maximum height of 3.5 feet in the lakeside yard. This provision is problematic because it is not clear how it interacts with the shoreland overlay district's prohibition on structures within the shoreland setback, which extends between 75 and 150 feet fiom the ordinary high water level, depending on the lake's classification, or with the City's requirement that pool fences be a minimum of 5 feet in height. Issue 2: Shoreland Fences 423 Clarifr Division Conceming Fences llllay 17,2022 Page 3 The strictest reading ofthe City Code would be that no fence is permitted within the shoreland setback and any lakeside fences outside of the required setback are limited to a maximum height of 3.5 feet, an interpretation that would effectively prohibit the placement ofpools on riparian lots. Historically, staff has used a more liberal interpretation that applies the 3.S-foot height limit only to fences within the shoreland setback and applies the City's general height regulations to fences outside of the shoreland setback. This policy has the drawback ofhaving no associated minimum setback for fences from the lakes ordinary high water level, but does allow for the construction offences meeting the requirements for pool fencing on riparian lots. In order to determine how to best reconcile these provisions ofthe City Code, staff considered how many nonconformities would be created as well as the overall intent ofthe Code. Regarding the potential creation of nonconformities, staff is not aware of many fences that are present within the shoreland setback; however, there are a significant number of riparian properties with pools and their associated fencing. When considering the intent ofthe shoreland ordinance, the primary factors are the goals of preserving the viewscape of the lakeshore as seen from the water and allowing wildlife unimpeded access to and between shoreland habitats. The intent ofthe 3.S-foot height limit for lakeside fences is minimizing the visual impact of these fences. Staff believes that the best course ofaction would be to prohibit all fencing within the required shoreland setback while subjecting fences outside ofthe setback to the City's general fence height regulations. This change would eliminate the conflict between the fence ordinance and the City's shoreland overlay district in favor ofthe shoreland overlay district's genetal prohibition on structures within the shoreland setback. It would also permit riparian property owners to install pools and their required fencing, assuming they can meet the required shoreland setback. While there are undoubtedly some fences within the shoreland setback that will be rendered non- conforming, staff does not believe it will be a large number. Issue 3: Height Sec. 20-1023 ofthe City's fence ordinance requires a conditional use permit (CUP) for any fence over 6.5 feet in height. This section ofthe Code conflicts with another section, Sec. 20-1018, that allows commercial and industrial fences to be up to 8 feet tall, with a cUP required to exceed 8 feet in height. It is likely that the intent of Sec. 20-1023 was to provide regulations solely for residential fences; however, that is not clear from the language used within the section' Staff recommends that language be added to this section to make it clear that its provisions only apply to residential districts, and that the requirement for fences over 6.5 feet to receive a CIJP be removed. In every other section ofthe City Code a deviation from a height limit is handled through the variance process. Indeed, the variance process exists precisely to address these types ofrequest. The Findings ofFact associated with a variance request is better suited to the residential context than the findings associated with a CUP, and variances do not require staff to conduct annual compliance inspections. Removing the CUP requirement for these fences will lead to fences being treated like every other deviation from a zoning standard and subject to the normal variance process. 424 Clariff Division Conceming Fences May 17,2022 Page 4 In addition to the CUP requirement, this section of the City Code has several diffrcult-to- interpret and/or seemingly conflicting provisions. The subsection addressing corner or double fronted lots has special standards for fences within the front yard setbacks ofthese lots and states that the front shall be determined by the location ofthe garage. The City Code's general rule is that any lot line abutting a roadway is considered a front yard and is subject to the front yard setback; however, when interpreting the code specific provisions always ovemrle general provisions and, within this subsection, it states that the front shall be determined by the location ofthe garage. This can pose problems as the garage's orientation does not always line up with the property's access to the street and a major intent ofthe ordinance is prevent fences from creating sight line issues for vehicles. This can cause issues as this section of the code applies the front yard standards to the sight distance triangle ofthe street intersection for comer and double fronted lots, but not the sight distance triangle created by the driveway. ln situations where the driveway access does not align with the garage orientation, the code as written could permit fencing that obstructed the driveway's sight lines. Since the fence code stipulates that only one ofa comer or double frontage lot's front yards is subject to the front yard standards, the only provisions that actually alter the property's allowable fencing are the application offront yard standards to the sight distance triangle and limitation of open fencing to 4 feet in height, as compared to the 6.5 foot high open fences front yards on non- comer or double fionted lots are permitted. It is not clear that fencing in the front yard of comer or double fronted needs to be subject to different height limits than front yard fences on other properties. The only safety concem would be within the sight distance triangle, which is present for driveway accesses on all lots. Staff recommends that the provisions goveming comer and double frontage lots be amended to allow these lots to have the same front yard fences as other properties, to clariff that front yard fence height limits apply to all sight distance triangles on the property, and to clarify that the front is determined by the driveway access to the public street. Issue 4: Borbed llire ond Eleclric Fences The City currently prohibits the use of barbed wire and electric fences in residential districts, but allows its use in agricultural districts. It is not clear how this provision should be applied to prope(ies zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2) and Rural Residential District (RR). Both of these districts list agriculture and single-family dwellings as permitted uses, and the City does not define what constitutes an agricultural district. Staffbelieves that the intent ofthe provision was that properties actively engaged in agriculture could use barbed wire and electric fences, while properties being solely used for residential purposes would be limited to other fence types; however, the language of the code does not reflect this. As written, a property owner on a lot zoned A2 or RR could make the case that since agriculture is a permitted use in their zoning district they are in an agricultural district and can install a barbed wire or electric fence, regardless ofifthe property is being actively used for an agricultural purpose. 425 Clariff Division Conceming Fences May 17,2022 Page 5 In order to avoid confusion, staff is proposing to amend this section to read, "Balbed wire and electric fences are permitted i+agrieuhural{is+de+s on properties being used for agriculture." This added language would make it clear that single-family homes within the City's large lot RR md A-2 subdivisions are not permitted to install barbed wire or electric fences, regardless of the fact that agriculture is theoretically permitted within the zoning district. Since the term agriculture is defined within the City Code as the commercial use of land for raising animals and plants, there should not be any ambiguity as to whether a parcel is being used for agriculture. Issue 5: Buffers The City Code prohibits the placement offences between required landscape buffers and collector or arterial streets. The intent of this section is to create a more attractive streetscape by ensuring that these streets are bordered by vegetation Iather than a collection offences in different styles and colors. Unfortunately, this provision is a source of permitting errors as relatively few lots in the City border collector or arterial streets and it is not always readily apparent if a lot has a required landscape buffer, as these areas are not typically noted on surveys and sometimes homeowners remove the required buffers without the City's knowledge. Additionally, in some cases subdivision plans designate large areas ofthe yard, say a 30-foot deep swath, as a vegetative buffer but the plantings are confined to within l0- 15 feet ofthe rear property line. In these cases, the Code would not allow the placement ofa fence within the designated 30-foot buffer area, even though there is a significant expanse of lawn between the edge of the buffer area and the start ofthe plantings. While the intent of this section is important, staff believes that it could be met by amending the section to prohibit the placement offences between the required landscaping and collector or arterial streets. This change would allow homeowners to enclose more oftheir yards and would prevent the creation of unusable yard space between the end ofthe fence and the actual start of the required landscaping. So long as the fence is located on the house side of the plantings, it should not negatively impact the aesthetics of the City's street corridors. The permitting error issue is more difficult to address; however, staffbelieves that one of the reasons that this section ofthe Code is often overlooked is that it follows the wetland section and is labeled as "Buffers". Since buffers typically refer to wetland buffers it is easy for fencing contractors and new staff members to read through this section of the Code and not realize that it applies to nonwetland landscape buffers. Staffbelieves that relabeling the section "Landscape Buffers" will help prevent this section from being overlooked. Sec 20-91 Zonin s Permit Recommendation: Staff recommends that the fence ordinance be amended to increase its clarity and consistency. The proposed ordinance would read as follows: 426 Clarifi Division Conceming Fences May 17,2022 Page 6 I . A zoning permit shall be required for the construction of structures which do not require building permits to determine compliance with zoning requirements such as setback, site coverage, structure height, etc.: l. Agricultural buildings. 2. Decks less than 30 inches above the ground and not attached to the principal structure. 3. Driveway expansions. 4. One-story detached accessory structures, used as tool or storage sheds, playhouses, and similar uses, 200 square feet or less in building area. 5. Patios. 6. Permanent fences less than six seven feet in height. 7. Retaining walls four feet and less in height. 8. Sport courts. 2. Any zoning permit application that fails to meet zoning ordinance requirements shall be denied by the community development director. 3. Application for a permit required by article shall be made to the City upon a form fumished by the City. A nonrefundable fee in the amount established pursuant to the ordinance adopting fees shall be paid to the City when the application is filed. DIVISION 5. - FENCES AND WALLS Sec.20-1016. - Intent. The intent ofthis division is to provide standards for fences along the perimeter oflots that may be decorative or act as boundaries and/or barriers. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, $ l2(6-12-l), 12-15-86) Sec. 20- 1017. - Permit. A zoning permit shall be obtained for any permanent fence installed for any purpose, other than an agricultural purpose prior to installation of same. The installation of temporary or seasonal fencing, e.g., snow fencing, garden fencing, etc., without permanent posts is exempt from this requirement. A site plan showing the location of the fence shall be submitted with the permit application. The City may require a permit applicant to provide a registered land survey establishing property lines. A building permit, in lieu of a zoning eemplianeere+ie*-permit, shall be required for fences in excess ofsix seven feet in height and retaining walls in excess of four feet in height. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, $ 12(6-12-2, 6-12-4,6-12-5), l2-15-86; Ord. No. 377, g 122, 5-24-04) Sec. 20-1018. - Commercial and industrial fences. (a) Fences for screening or storage purposes installed on property used for commercial or industrial uses may have a maximum height of eight feet. When commercial or industrial uses abut property used or zoned for residential uses, a fence at least six feet in height may 427 Clarifr Division Conceming Fences May 17,2022 Page 7 be placed between the residential and the commercial and industrial property if the City determines that there is a need for a fence. The City may elect to use landscaping consisting of berms and vegetation to provide screening. Ifa fence is used, such fence must be 100 percent opaque. Commercial or industrial fences over eight feet shall require a conditional use permit. (b) Fences utilizing barbed wire in all commercial and industrial districts shall require a conditional use permit. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VL $ 12(6-12-10), l2-15-86; Ord. No. 90, $ 3, 3-14-88; Ord. No. 255, S 2,7- 22-96) Sec. 20- 1019. - Location- (a) Generally. All fences and retaining walls shall be located entirely upon the property of the fence or retaining wall owner unless the owner of the adjoining property agrees, in writing, that said fence or retaining wall may be erected on the prope(y line ofthe respective properties. Such agreement shall be submitted at the time of building permit application. Encroachment into a City easement shall require an encroachment agreement between the property owner and the City. Fences shall not be placed within the public right-of-way. (b) IYetlands. No fences shall be permitted below the ordinary high water mark of a wetland or within the required wetland buffer area. (c) Landscape Buffers. No fences shall be permitted between the landscaping approved in a subdivision's landscape plan within a required landscape buffer and a collector or arterial street. (d) Temporary fences. Temporary fencing, such as fencing installed to enclose a seasonal garden or snow fencing in winter, may not be located within the front yard setback. Snow fencing shall not be located within any drainage or utility easement. (e) Bluffs. No fences shall be permitted within the 30-foot bluff setback. (f1 Shoreline Fezces. No fences shall be permitted within the structure setback from the ordinary high water mark stipulated in Section 20-481. (Ord. No. 80, kt. VI, $ 12(6-12-3), l2-15-86; Ord. No. 181, $ l,3-8-93; Ord. No.255, $ 3,7- 22-96; Ord. No. 377, $ 123, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 423, $ 7, 6-12-06) Sec. 20-1020. - Constnrction and maintenance. Every fence shall be constructed in a substantial, workmanlike manner and of material reasonably suited for the purpose for which the fence is proposed to be used. Every fence shall be maintained in such condition as to not become a hazard, eyesore, or public or private 428 Clarifr Division Conceming Fences May 17,2022 Page 8 nuisance. All fences shall be constructed so that the side containing the framing supports and crosspieces face the interior of the fence owner's lot. Any fence which does not comply with the provisions of this chapter or which endangers the public safety, health or welfare shall be considered a public nuisance. Abatement proceedings may be instituted by the proper City official after l5 days' notification, if the o*.ner ofsuch fence has not undertaken the necessary repairs to abate the nuisance. Link fences shall be constructed in such a manner that no barbed ends shall be exposed. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, $ l2(6-12-6), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-1021. - Swimming pool fences. All in-ground swimming pools shall be protected by a fence not less than five feet in height. All gates shall have a self-closing and self-latching latch installed on the pool side ofthe fence. All fences shall be nonclimbable and shall have intermediate rails or omamental pattem such that a sphere four inches in diameter cannot pass though. This section does not apply to pools which are located on property which are completely enclosed by a perimeter fence five feet in height. (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, $ 12(6-12-7), l2-15-86; Ord. No. I 10, $ 2, 8-28-89) Sec. 20-1022. - Sheretine-fenees- Reserved in *e-rear:a*4atesi*). (Ord. No. 80, Art. VI, $ l2(6-12-8), l2-15-86) Sec.20-1023. - Height. Aaay Residential fences e+e+ are limited to six and one-half feet in height musr-reeer+ea eend@+.Thefenceheightismeasuredfromgradetothehighestpointonthe fence. All other residential fences shall meet the following standards: (a) Side yards and rear yards. In any side or rear yard on lots, the height of fences shall not exceed six and one-half feet. (b) Front yards. Fences in the required front yard setback area that arc opaque shall not exceed three feet in height. Chain link fences in this area shall not exceed four feet in height. All other open fences in this area shall not exceed six and one-half feet in height. (c) Corner or double fronted lots. In addition to the other provisions contained in this section, fences located on comer or double fronted lots shall be subject to the following provisions: 429 Clariff Division Conceming Fences May 17,2022 Page 9 ( 1) Any fence within the required front yard setback area shall not exceed three feet in height if opaque construction, four feet if chain linlq or fu+* six and one-half feet in height if open construction. (2) The maximum height of a fence shall conform to the requirements of fences in front yards within the sight distance triangle of street intersections and neighboring driveways. eerne+si is{ (3) The front yard shall be determined by the location ofthe property's access by a driveway to the public street garage. (Ord. No.80, Art. VI, $ l2(6-12-9), 12-15-86; Ord. No. l8l, $ 2,3-8-93; Ord. No.240, $ 25,7- 24-9s) Sec. 20-1024. - Barbed wire and electric fences. Barbed wire and electric fences are prohibited in all residential districts. Barbed wire and electric fences are permitted i+agrieult*aldistriets on properties being used for agriculture. (Ord. No.90, $ 4,3-14-88; Ord. No.451, $ 10, 5-29-07) G:\PLANWW\lssue Papers ard Repons (Datu)\Fences\Fences Issue Pap€r.docx 430 DATE: CITY OT CIIAI'IHASSXN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO:Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner May 17,2022 RSF Accessory Structure Height FROM: SUBJ: Every residential district except the Single-Family Residential (RSF) district specifies both a maximum height and maximum number of stories for accessory structures. The RSF district only specifies a maximum height which leads to confusion as to whether or not multi-story accessory structures are permitted. Summary: The City Code limits both the height and numbers of stories for accessory structures in all residential districts, with the exception of the RSF district where the maximum number of stories an accessory structure is permitted is not specified. This leads to confusion as to whether or not residents in the RSF district can build two-story detached structures. One- and two-story accessory structures tend to have different designs, uses, and impacts on surrounding parcels. Due to the higher potential for two-story accessory structues to adversely impact surrounding properties, staff believes accessory structures in the RSF district should be limited to a single- story. This limit would be consistent with the limit placed on accessory structures in the other non-large lot residential districts. Relevant Citv Code: Section 20-904 govems the placement and maximum size (foot print) ofaccessory structures. Section 20-615(h)(2) limits accessory structures in the RSF district to 20 feet in height. PH 952.227.1100 . www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us . FX 952.227.1110 77OO MARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I47 .CHANHASSEN .IYINNESOTA 55317 PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 20, conceming accessory structure height in the RSF District." Issue: 431 RSF Accessory Structure Height May 17,2022 Page 2 Ordinance 80 passed in December of 1986 limited accessory structures in the RSF district to three stories/40 feet in height. Ordinance 145 passed in April of l99l changed rhe limit to 20 feet in height. Analvsis: The City Code restricts size and placement ofaccessory structures in residential districts in order to ensure that they are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. This compatibility involves both a compatibility ofscale, i.e. size, and ofuse. The intention is for accessory structures to complement the primary structure and provide additional storage or recreational amenities, while not crowding neighboring parcels or inviting use as places of business or re al units. It has been the City's experience that large multi-story accessory structues tend to be unwelcome additions in the City's neighborhoods and that they often end up being used to run contractors yards, landscaping businesses, or other home occupations. More rarely, homeowners modifu the second level to create apartments in violation ofthe City's prohibition on accessory dwelling units. For these reasons, the City amended the City Code in l99l to restrict the maximum size of accessory structues outside of the large lot residential areas to 1,000 square feet and to reduce the allowed height of accessory structures in the RSF district from three stories, 40 feet to 20 feet in height. Staff is uncertain why a story limit was not adopted at that time. All other residential zoning districts limit the maximum number of stories that an accessory structure can be. For large lot properties, those with a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres, the limit is three stories, 35 feet, and for all other residential districts, except the RSF, the limit is one story, l5 feet. Staff believes the intention of the 20-foot height limit in the RSF district is to allow for the use of accessory structure attic space for additional storage space and for the construction of detached garages that can accommodate the storage ofa larger recreation vehicle. As a matter ofpolicy, the City does not consider semi-finished attic space to constitute a story so restricting these structures to one story would not interfere with these uses. It would however prevent the creation of upper level finished spaces with sewer and water services that lend themselves being used for home occupations or as rental uses. A final consideration is the fact that the City measures height from highest grade to the midpoint ofthe highest gable. When residents design two-story accessory structues, they typically try to maximize the second level's ceiling height which has resulted in roofpeaks signifrcantly over 20 Accessory Structure Height and Stories by Residential Oistrid Zoning Distrid Max Height Max Stories A-2: Agricultural Estate 3s ft.3 RR: Rural Residential 35 ft.3 RSF: Single-Family Residential 20 ft.Silent R-4: Mir Low Density Residential 15 ft.I RLM: Residential Low and Medium Density 15 ft.I R-8: Mixed Medium Density Residential t5 ft.1 R-12 1s ft.1 R-16 1s ft.1 432 feet in height. The City has received complaints when neighbors realize that the detached garage being built l0 feet from their lot line will have a height roughly comparable to their home's height. While the proposed change would not prevent residents from maximizing their building height, it would reduce the incentives to maximize building height that is created by a possible second story. Adopting a one story, 20-foot height limit would provide transparency for homeowners and contractors who are planning and designing accessory stnrcnres and would also ensure that the City Code is consistently applied within the RSF disrict by removing the ambiguity that is currently present. Furthermore, it would bring the RSF district closer into line with the accessory structure standards present in the other Low Density Residential (RLM) districts. While it is true that the other districts limit these structures to only 15 feet in height, staff does not recommend reducing the RSF accessory structure height due to the large number of non-conformities the change would create. Staff feels the fact that the RSF district does have a larger minimum lot size than the RLM district and the fact that the R-4 district permits fwin homes with smaller lot sizesjustifies the modest difference in permitted accessory structure heights between these otherwise comparable districts. 1. No Change. 2. Limit to one story/2o feet. Staff recommends Altemative 2. This would bring accessory structures in the RSF district into line with those located in the other non-large lot residential districts. The proposed ordinance would read as follows: Sec 20-615(hX2) (2) For accessory structures, one story/2O feet. RSF Accessory Structure Height May 17,2022 Page 3 Alternatives: Recommendation: 433 TO FROM: CITY OT CHAI'IHASSIN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner May 17,2022 Commercial, Industrial, and Office-Institutional Design Standards DATE: SUBJ: PROPOSEDMOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 20 conceming design standards for commercial, industrial, and offi ce-institutional developments." Issue: The City's design standards for commercial, industrial, and office-institutional developments prohibit the use ofpainted concrete, brick, and block in visible exterior areas. This standard was created in response to the maintenance issues associated with the paints available at the time the ordinance was adopted; however, the quality ofpaints has improved and the standard may no longer be necessary. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO I4ARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I47 .CHANHASSEN .IIINNESOTA 553]7 MEMORANDUM Summarv: The City Code prohibits the use ofpainted concrete, brick, and block on visible exterior portions of commercial, industrial, and office-instirutional buildings. The prohibition was adopted due to the fact that the City had several poorly maintained buildings where issues with pealing and chipping paint were not being addressed. At the time the City's desigr standards were adopted, the general consensus was that the maintenance requirements of painted surfaces created a risk of unattractive facades and, thus, painted surfaces should be restricted to non-visible or accent elements. Staff believes that modern paints are much better at withstanding Minnesota's weather and adhering to concrete, brick, and block. Additionally, since painting does not require a permit, several buildings have painted portions oftheir concrete, brick, and/or block facades in the years after they have received their original site plan approvals and staff has not observed the type of maintenance issues that were the impetus of the ordinance's prohibition. For these reasons, staff believes the City's design standards should be amended to remove the prohibition on painting. 434 Commercial, Industrial and OfficeJnstitutional Desigrr Standards May 17,2022 Page2 Relevant Citv Code: Section 20-1065 govems what type of materials can be used where and in what proportion on industrial, commercial, and office-institutional buildings. Analvsis: In 2001, the city concluded a several year discussion on possible design standards by passing Ordinance Number 327 which established standards for commercial, industrial, office- institutional, and multi-family buildings. The goal of these standards was to ensure a minimum quality of design and to help avoid future maintenance issues with these properties. The prohibition on painted concrete, brick, and block was primarily motivated by the presence of several older buildings in the city that were not being properly maintained, and by concem that as newly approved buildings aged, owners would not be willing to continually repaint the facades. Over the two decades since the design standards were adopted staff has observed several buildings where owners have painted over prohibited surfaces (concrete, brick, and/or block). Since painting does not require a permit the City has no practical way of monitoring or enforcing the prohibition; however, staff has not observed or received complaints of significant maintenance issues with these properties. Staff believes this is due to advances in paints which allow paints on these surfaces to better withstand Minnesota's weather, requiring less frequent reapplication. While lower maintenance facades have many advantages, staffbelieves that existing design standards are overly restrictive and that the prohibition on painting concrete, brick, and block should be removed. Developments will still need to meet the requirement that: "All manmade architectural, landscape, and paving materials shall reflect the highest quality possible and should be used in a manner suitable to the natue of the material, its role in the design, general durability, expected level ofuse or abuse, weathering characteristics, and ease and frequency of maintenance." which provides the City with grounds to address any maintenance concems with proposed materials or paints during the site plan review process. l. No Change. 2. Remove the prohibition on painted concrete, brick, and block. Recommendation: Staff recommends Altemative 2. Alternatives: 435 Commercial, Industrial and OfficeJnstitutional Desigr Standards May 17,2022 Page 3 Sec 20-1065 tlaterial And Detail a) All manmade architectural, landscape, and paving materials shall reflect the highest quality possible and should be used in a manner suitable to the nature of the material, its role in the design, general durability, expected level of use or abuse, weathering characteristics, and ease and frequency of maintenance. The following materials or equivalent materials are acceptable: Brick Stone Glass Textured masonry units Wood, consisting of lap siding with an exposure no greater than seven inches or wood shakes; surfaces must be painted Stucco Tilt up concrete panels that are grid or brick like in appearance b) Accent material may occupy up to 15 percent of the building's facade. These may include metal, glass block, spandrel glass or similar materials approved by the city. Iaabria+and-Detail 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 i I .f irttl 1 FI ti t I I I 'l"l ,i J' 436 Commercial, Industrial and Offi ce-lnstitutional Design Standards May 17,2022 Page 4 c) The following may not be used in any visible exterior application except when specifically permitted by the city in areas with limited public view or accent areas: 1. Plain/painted poured concrete panels "cast in pla@" z-+einted++i€kRes erved @ReservedMReserved 5. Unadorned plain erpainte4concrete block 6. Tilt-up concrete panel that are ribbed or corduroy in appearance 7. Prefabricated steel or sheet metal panels 8. Reflective glass 9. Aluminum, vinyl, fiberglass, asphalt or fiberboard siding '1O.ElFS (exterior insulation and finish system) may be used as an accent but not a primary material 437 CITY OT CIIAI'IHASSII'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life- Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM FROM: TO Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner May 17,2022 Restaurants in Neighborhood Business District DATE: SUBJ: PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 20, conceming restaurants in the BN District." Issue: The Neighborhood Business (BN) district lists standard restaurants and fast-food restauranls without a drive-through as part ofa shopping center as conditional uses. This creates an unnecessary barrier for restaurants wishing to locate in the BN district. The BN district is intended to be located near residential neighborhoods and to accommodate neighborhood-scale commercial uses and for this reason it is the most restrictive ofthe City's commercial districts. Currently one area of the City is zoned BN and five Planned Unit Developments Use the BN zoning as their underlying zoning standard. While the base BN zoning classifies restaurants as conditional uses, all ofthe Planned Unit Developments (PUD) list them as a permitted use. To date, no restaurant located in a BN district or PUD with BN as the underlying zoning has caused a complaint. Given the fact that conditional use permits (CUP) require a public hearing and City Council approval, staff believes the requirement creates an unnecessary barrier and delay for restaurants looking to locate in this zoning district. Chapter 20, Article IV Conditional Use Permits lists the administrative process and general issuance standards for Conditional Use Pemrits. Section 20-296, Fast-Food Restaurants lists the specific requirements for issuing a Conditional Use Permit for a fast food restaurant. pH 952.227.1100 . www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO MARKET BOULEVARD . PO BOX I47 .CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 Summarry: Relevant Citv Code: 438 Restaurants in Neighborhood Business District May 17,2022 Page 2 Chapter 20, Article XVI "BN" Neighborhood Business District lists the intent of and the permitted and conditional uses allowed in the BN district. Analysis: The BN district is often used for commercial areas that are near residential neighborhoods or as the underling zoning for the commercial portion of mixed use commercial and residential PUDs. The intent of this district is to allow for retail and service establishment that will meet the needs of nearby residents without unduly disrupting the surrounding neighborhoods. There is currently one area of the city zoned BN and five PUDs that reference the BN district. The section ofthe city zoned BN is located southeast ofthe intersection of Highway 5 and Great Plains Boulevard. The BN district requires a CUP for restaurants, presumably due to concems that restaurant noise and traffic has the potential to disrupt adjacent residential neighborhoods. Requiring a CUP means that any restaurant wishing to lease space within the BN district must make an application to the City, appear before a public hearing, and ultimately receive City Council approval, a process that typically takes 50 to 60 days. Due to the site specific nature ofCUPs, a restaurant switching locations within the BN district would also need to go though the CUP process for the new location. The CUP process provides the City with an opportunity to review the restaurant's proposed operations and place any conditions deemed necessary to mitigate the impact ofthe business on surrounding parcels. None of the PUDs with underlying BN zoning require a CUP for restaurants. These developments are typically near residential neighborhoods or have residential homes incorporated into the PUD. Staff is not aware ofhaving ever received a complaint about a restaurant operating in one ofthese areas. The area of the city zoned BN is already home to the American Legion, Bongards Creamery's corporate office, Park Nicollet Clinic, a daycare, and the shopping center that used to host the Marathon gas station. It is unlikely that any restaurant that went into one ofthese sites would be able to negatively impact the residential neighborhood to the south or that it would represent a more intensive use than what is currently present or is allowed as a permitted use in the district. Any major change to the existing sites would require a site plan approval, either administrative or one going before the Planning Commission and City Council, which would allow the City the opportr:nity to comment on and mitigate potential impacts. 'ti ?.. ? '..,,r !la i Neighborhood Business -"\ _J !-/ -a 439 Restaurants in Neighborhood Business District May 17,2022 Page 3 For these reasons, it is staff s belief that the existing CUP requirement should be removed and that "restaurants without drive+hrough facilities" should be classified as a permitted use within the BN district. l. No Change. 2. List restaurants without a drive-through as a permitted use. Recommendation: Staff recommends Altemative 2. This would remove an unnecessary obstacle to development within the BN district. The proposed ordinance would read as follows: Sec 20-692 P Uses The following uses are permitted in a "BN" District: 1. Antennas as regulated by article )OO( of this chapter. 2. Community center. 3. Convenience stores without gas pumps. 4. Day care center. 5. Health services. 6. Home fumishings. 7. Oftices. 8. Personal services. 9. Privale clubs and lodges. 10. Shopping center. 1 l. Small appliance repair shop. 12. Specialty retail shop. 13. Utility services. 14. Veterinary clinics. 15. Adult day care, subject to the requirements of section 20-966. 16. Restaurants without drive-through facilities. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, $ 10(5-10-2), l2-15-86; Ord. No. 377, $ 94,5-24-04; Ord. No. 628, $ 30, 12- l1-17) Sec 20-694 C onditional Uses The following are conditional uses in a "BN" District: l. Bed and breakfast establishments. 2. Convenience store with gas pumps. Alternatives: 440 Restaurants in Neighborhood Business District May 17,2022 Page 4 3. Banks with drive-through facilities. 1, Fast fo€d restaura*ts witheEt a driye t&rough as part ofa sh€pping eenter, 5. Motor fuel station. 5. Reserved. 7. Standa*4restaurants. 441 CITY OT CHANIIASSXN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO:Planning Commission FROM: MacKenzieYoung-Walters,AssociatePlanner DATE: May 17,2022 SUBJ:Residential Screening for Visual Impacts The City's Landscaping and Tree Removal ordinance was not amended in 2004 to include the Residential Low and Medium Density (RLM) district and to remove the Agricultural Preservation (Al ) District. On May 24,2004, the City Council passed a major amendment to the City's zoning code which removed the Al district and established the RLM district. Several sections within the City's landscaping ordinance were not amended to remove references to the A1 district and incorporate the new RLM district. Ambiguity is also present within the ordinance due to the use of the term single-family development. Under the City's definitions, twin homes are single-family developments. It is not clear if the intention is to require a buffer solely at the density threshold of four units an acre or whenever smaller lots or attached homes are present. Additionally, for reasons that are not clear, the verbiage of a section ofthe Code pertaining to Single-Family Residential districts was changed from "article" to "ordinance". This change was not the result of a Code amendment and creates a potential for confusion. Stalf recommends that the Code be amended to remove references to the Al district, add references to the RLM district where appropriate, require buffers between low and medium/high density developments, and restore the use of the word "article". Sec. 1-2: Defines multifamily as a building with three or more dwelling units and single-family as a building containing one dwelling unit with sub-definitions for single-family attached and detached dwelling units. Sec.20-1176(b): Exempts single-family developments in Al, 42, RR, RSF, and R4 from the landscape ordinance, save for provisions of I 176(f)(2)(e). PH 952.227.1100 . www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 ,OO MARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I47 . CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 Issue: Summary: Relevant Citl' Code: 442 Residential Screening for Visual lmpacts May 17,2022 Page 2 Sec. 20-l 176(f)(2)(e): Requires type B buffer yards between medium density and large lot or low density residential developments, and type C buffer yards benveen high density and large lot or low density residential developments. Sec. 20- 1 1 80(b)(2): States that principal and accessory structures in any R4, R8, Rl2, Rl6 district or PUD district with residential development over 4 units per acre shall be screened from lots located in any A1, 42, RR or RSF district. Ordinance 250 which was passed on April 8, 1996 established the buffer yard requirements found in Section 20-1176(f), added the R4 district to the list of single-family developments exempted from the article's provisions, dropped the clarifring word "detached" from the preexisting "single-family detached residences" qualifier, and noted that these developments were now subject to the requirements ofSection 20-1176(0. Ordinance 377 which was passed on May 24, 2004 created the RLM district and removed the A1 district. Relevant Ordinances: Ordinance 153 which was passed on November 4, 1991 established the framework of the current landscaping ordinance. It exempted single-family detached residences in A1, A2, RR, and RSF from its article's provisions and required screening/buffering between R4, R8, Rl2, R16, and PUDs with densities over four units an acre from A1, A2, RR or RSF lots' 443 Residential Screening for Visual Impacts May 17,2022 Page 3 The intent ofbuffering requirements are to protect lower intensity land uses from the visual impact ofhigher intensity land uses. With regards to residential developments, the intensity of the land use is determined by a development's density, size oflots, and type of structures. In developing screening requirements, the City can take any or all ofthese into consideration. As the City Code is currently written, density and type of structure, i.e. single-family versus multi- family, appear to be the primary consideration in determining ifscreening should be present. When determining how to reconcile the R4 district's inclusion in both the exempt zoning district lists and the list ofdistricts that must be screened from single-family districts, it is important to note that the R4 district is a low-density residential district which permits both detached single family and nvin-homes at densities ofup to four units per acre. It is likely that the R4 district was originally included in the mandatory screening list due to concems about placing twin-home developments up against detached single-family developments, and that it was subsequently added to the exempt list due to the fact that its single-family standards are identical to those found in the City's RSF district and its inability to exceed the four units per acre threshold. The R4 and RSF districts differ chiefly in the fact that the R4 permits twin homes but the RSF does not. tn the initial version of the landscape ordinance, only detached single-family residences were exempted from the ordinance; however, it was subsequently amended to remove the Residentiel Zoning Districts: Permitted housin& Density, and Additional Screening Additional Screeni RequiredZonin& Hous and oensity ProposedMax Density CurrentMin Lot AreaHousinS Type No No1 uniV10 acres2.5 acresA-2 Detached Single-Family No1 unit/10 affes No2.5 acresRROetached Single-Family No2,9 units/acre No15,000 sq. ft.Detached single-FamilyRSF No No2.9 units/acre15,000 sq. ftR,4 Detached Single-Family NoNo10,000 sq. ft 4 units/acreTwin-Home No3.96 units/acre11,000 sq. ft.Detached Single-FamilyPUD Yes*16 units/acre Yes+NoneAttached/Cluster/M ulti Silent No"4.84 units/acre9,000 sq. ftRLMDetached Single-Famity No*'6 units/acre Silent7,260 sq. ft.Twin-Home Silent Yes8 units/acresq. ft.5Multi-family Yes5.8 units/acre Yes7,500 sq. ft.Twin-HomeR-8 Yes Yes7.92 units/acre5,500 s .ft.Multi-family YesYes3,600 sq. ft.12.1 units/acreMuhi-familyR-12 Yes16 units/acre Yes2,70O sq. ft.R-16 Muhi-fam rlf over 4 units per acre. '*At densities over 4 u n its/affe buffer ya rd req uirements a re tr red due to medium dens land use, Analysis: Zoning No Note: Sec. 20-1176 which contains the base screening requirements for all districts in included for reference as arn attachment. 444 Residential Screening for Visual Impacts May 17,2022 Page 4 qualifier "detached". Since the City's definition of single-family dwelling included twin homes, this would exempt all R4 developments, both single-family and twin home, from the ordinance's screening requirements. While twin home developments are potentially a more intense land use than detached single-family homes, the R4 district is a low density residential district and the City allows for the creation of detached single-family developments through the RLM and Planned Unit Development zoning districts at the same four unit per acre maximum density as the R4 district. As the City Code does not currently require additional screening between a 10,000-sq. ft. detached single-famity lot and a 15,000 sq. ft. detached single-family lot, it does not make sense to require additional screening between a 20,000 sq. ft. lot with a twin home (10,000 sq. ft. per dwelling unit) and a 15,000 sq. ft. detached single-family lot. The appropriate treatment ofthe RLM district is more complicated as this zoning district can be used in land guided for both low and medium density residential developments. This district permits detached single-family homes to have lots as small as 9,000 sq. ft. and twin homes to have lots as small as 7 ,260 sq. ft. per dwelling unit; however, the district requires the dedication of large areas of upland for preservation and permanent open space in exchange for these smaller lot siies. The residents ofa detached single-family development with 15,000 sq. ft. lots may feel that an adjacent development with detached single-family homes on 9,000 sq. ft' lots is a significantly more intense land use, but it has long been the City's position that detached single- family homes do not need to be screened from other detached single-family homes. Additionally, 9,000 sq. ft. lots are not significantly smaller than the 11,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size that would be present in a PUD with a density ofjust under four units per acre which are currently exempted from the screening requirements. It should also be noted that the use ofexclusively 9,000 sq. ft. lots would require land guided medium density which, if adjacent to land guided low density, would trigger Section 20-l176(f)'s buffer yard requirements, regardless ofhousing t}'pe. Finally, it is the expectation that the required upland dedication for receiving the RLM zoning would be in a location to provide additional screening and buffering, if appropriate. Similar considerations appty to RLM twin home developments. In practice, the use ofsub-10,000 sq. ft. per dwelling unit lots would require land guided for medium density, which would trigger buffer yard requirements if adjacent to land guided for low density development. Given all of the above, staffbelieves the existing distinction between single-family (defined as detached single-family and twin homes) and multifamily (defined as structures with more than three dwelling units) is the most important consideration for determining when additional screening should be required, and in practice housing typically transitions from single-family to multi-family around the four unit per acre lot to medium density threshold. For the rare cases where tw.in home or detached single-family developments exceeding four units per acre are proposed next to developments of four units an acre or less, the buffer yard requirements in Section 20-1 176(f) provide a sufficient visual barrier. Alternatives: -D Amend dre Landscape Ordinance to include the RLM district, remove references to the A1 district, and require screening between attached and detached housing types' 445 Residential Screening for Visual Impacts May 17,2022 Page 5 2) Amend the Landscape Ordinance to include the RLM district, remove references to the Al district, and require screening between single-family and multi-family housing types. 3) Amend the Landscape Ordinance to include the RLM district, remove references to the Al district, and require screening between land guided for large lot or low density residential developments and land guided for medium or high density residential developments. Recommendation: Staff recommends Altemative 2 The proposed amendments would read as follows: Sec. 20-1 176(b) (b)Except for buffer yard requirements specified in subsection 20-1176(0 below, this erdisanee article does not apply to single-family developments in AL A2' RR, RSF, RLM and R4 zoning districts which are regulated by landscaping requirements contained in the subdivision ordinance (chapter l8). Sec. 20-1180(bX2). (2)Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto located in any RLM, R{ R8, Rl2, Rl6, disiet or planned unit development district containing residential development at densities exceeding four units per acre shall be screened from lots located in any R4 A+ A2, RR or RSF district. Attrchment 1) Sec.20-1176: Intent, Scope and Compliance g:\planvnu^issue pape6 dd repons (dEfts)rdd rlm !o landscapc\dm bufrer requitemenls.docx 446 5/3/22, 8:49 AM Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinances&name=Sec_20-1176_Intent,_Scope_And_Compliance 1/8 Sec 20-1176 Intent, Scope And Compliance (a)The intent of this ordinance is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between noncompatible land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. (b)Except for buffer yard requirements specified in subsection 20-1176(f) below, this ordinance does not apply to single-family developments in A1, A2, RR, RSF, and R4 zoning districts which are regulated by landscaping requirements contained in the subdivision ordinance (chapter 18). (c)No new site development, building, structure or vehicular use area is allowed, unless landscaping is provided as required in this ordinance. (d)No property lines shall be altered nor shall any building, structure or vehicular use area be expanded, unless the minimum landscaping required by the provisions of this ordinance is provided for the entire property. (e)The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to: (1)Truck loading areas; (2)Trash storage; (3)Parking lots, interior lot areas and perimeters; (4)Large unadorned building massing; (5)Garage doors associated with auto oriented uses; and (6)Vehicular stacking areas for drive through uses. (f)Buffering shall be provided between high intensity and low intensity uses, between a site and major streets and highways, and in areas where buffering is required by the comprehensive plan. Such buffering shall be located within a required buffer yard. The buffer yard is a unit of yard together with the planting required thereon. The amount of land and the type and amount of planting specified for each buffer yard required by this subsection are designed to ameliorate nuisances between adjacent land uses or between a land use and a public road. The planting units required of buffer yards have been calculated to ensure that they do, in fact, function to "buffer." (1)Buffer yards shall be located on the outer perimeter of a lot or parcel extending to the lot or parcel boundary line, except where easements, covenants or natural features may require the buffer yard to be set back from the property line. Subject to review and approval by the city engineering department, buffer yards that are compatible with the typical city boulevard planting requirements may be located within a portion of an existing municipal public collector or arterial right-of-way. (2)To determine the buffer yard required between two adjacent parcels or between a parcel and a street, the following procedure shall be followed: a.Identify the proposed land use of the parcel and the land use of the adjacent parcel or functional classification of abutting right-of-way based on the city future land use plan. b.Determine the buffer yard required on each boundary, or segment thereof, of the 447 5/3/22, 8:49 AM Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinances&name=Sec_20-1176_Intent,_Scope_And_Compliance 2/8 property by referring to the following table of buffer yard requirements and illustrations set at the end of subsection (2), which specify the buffer yard required between adjacent uses and streets. c.Buffer yard requirements are stated in terms of the width of the buffer yard and the number of plant units required per 100 linear feet of buffer yard. Each illustration depicts the minimum buffer yard required between two uses or adjacent to a collector or arterial right-of-way. The project developer shall be responsible for providing 75 percent of the required plantings. If abutting property owner(s) desire to bring the buffering to 100 percent of the required buffer yard plantings, then the adjacent property owner(s) may install the remaining 25 percent of the required plantings on their own property. When the parcel abuts public property, such as roads or parks, the developer shall be responsible for 100 percent of the required plantings. d.Whenever a wall, fence, or berm is required within a buffer yard, these are shown as "structure required" in the buffer yard illustrations. The erection and maintenance of all required structures shall be the responsibility of the buffer yard provider (project developer). Maintenance of the structure shall be the responsibility of the landowner on whose property the structure is located. e.All buffer yards shall be maintained free from all forms of development or storage of equipment or materials. A ground cover of vegetative or organic material shall be provided. Buffer yards shall be maintained free from junk and debris. Dead or diseased vegetation shall be removed and replaced with healthy vegetation. The responsibility to maintain, remove or replace plant materials shall be that of the landowner on whose property the plant material needing maintenance or replacement is located. TABLE OF BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS Proposed Development Adjacent Land Use LL/D D M D H D OF F MI X CO M PU B AC T PAS S OFF/IN D LL/LD none B C C C D B B A D MD none A B B C D B B A D HD none A A B C D B B A D OFF none B B A B B B B B B MIX none C C B B B C C C B COM none C D B B A C C C B PUB none A A B C C A A A C ACT none A B B B C A A A C PASS none A A B B C A A A C OFF/IND none C C B B B C B B B ROAD B B B B B B B B B C The land use abbreviations are as follows: 448 5/3/22, 8:49 AM Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinances&name=Sec_20-1176_Intent,_Scope_And_Compliance 3/8 LL/LD—Large lot and low density residential MD—Medium density residential HC—High density residential OFF—Office MIX—Mixed use COM—Commercial PUB—Public/semi-public ACT—Active park/open space PASS—Passive park/open space OFF/IND—Office/industrial ROAD—Collector and arterial road Bufferyard A Bufferyard B 449 5/3/22, 8:49 AM Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinances&name=Sec_20-1176_Intent,_Scope_And_Compliance 4/8 Bufferyard C 450 5/3/22, 8:49 AM Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinances&name=Sec_20-1176_Intent,_Scope_And_Compliance 5/8 Bufferyard D 451 5/3/22, 8:49 AM Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinances&name=Sec_20-1176_Intent,_Scope_And_Compliance 6/8 Fences 452 5/3/22, 8:49 AM Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinances&name=Sec_20-1176_Intent,_Scope_And_Compliance 7/8 (3)Plant material existing on a parcel which meets the buffer yard planting requirements of location, size and species may be counted toward the total buffer yard plant material requirement. Existing natural features such as slopes, woodlands or wetlands which provide physical separation between developments or between a development and a collector and arterial road may satisfy the buffering function of the required buffer yard. If approved by the city, proposed berms three feet and higher in the buffer yard may be substituted for up to one-half of the required understory trees and shrubs, depending on the length of the berm. For instance, if a berm runs the entire length of the buffer yard, the understory and shrub plantings may be reduced by one-half. Any boulevard trees or reforestation plantings required in the buffer yard can be counted towards required overstory buffer yard plantings if there is insufficient room for both types of plantings. (4)Buffer yards may be used for passive recreation and may contain a trail, provided that no plant material is eliminated, the total width of the buffer yard is maintained, and all other regulations of this subsection are met. Utility easements may be included within buffer yards, provided that the utility requirements and buffer yard requirements are compatible and canopy trees are not planted within such easement. (5)Where front, side and rear yards are required by this subsection, buffer yards may be established within such required yards. (6)Canopy trees are defined as those trees specified as primary or secondary deciduous trees or conifers in the city's subdivision ordinance. Conifers to be used as overstory trees shall have a minimum height of eight feet when planted. Arborvitae shall not be used as an overstory tree. (7)Understory trees are defined as those trees specified as ornamental or conifer trees in the city's subdivision ordinance. Conifers to be used as understory trees shall have a minimum height of six feet when planted. (8)In instances in which the city deems it necessary to provide year-round screening, the city may designate that all planting be of conifers. 453 5/3/22, 8:49 AM Print Preview https://chanhassen.municipalcodeonline.com/book/print?type=ordinances&name=Sec_20-1176_Intent,_Scope_And_Compliance 8/8 (g)The city shall encourage reforestation through boulevard and streetscape planting. (h)Mature stands of trees shall be preserved. (i)Reforestation shall be pursued as appropriate. (Ord. No. 153, § 1, 11-4-91; Ord. No. 250, §§ 2, 3, 4-8-96; Ord. No. 309, § 1, 8-14-00; Ord. No. 377, § 134, 5-24-04) 454 CffiOTCHANIIASSXN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM FROM: TO Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner May 17,2022 Court Appeal DeadlineSUBJ: PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance amending Chapters 20 concerning district court appeal deadlines." Issue: Courts in Minnesota have recently upheld statutory deadlines for appealing zoning decisions to district courts; however, Chanhassen's City Code does not stipulate a deadline for appealing zoning decisions to a district court. The City Code establishes the processes and timelines for appealing zoning decisions by the Board of Adjustrnents and Appeals (Planning Commission) to the City Council, but does not address appealing decisions of the City Council. Zoning decisions made by the City Council can be appealed through the district courts; however, the City Code does not establish a timeframe for appealing those decisions. Recently, courts in Minnesota upheld a statute in another city that required individuals wishing to appeal a zoning decision to make that appeal within thirty days of the decision in question. The City Attomey has recommended that the City of Chanhassen adopt a similar provision in order to ensure t}re timeliness ofany appeals. Section 20-29 establishes a time limit for appealing decisions of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals to the City Council, but is silent on the appeal of City Council decisions. Analvsis: The recent district court decision which confrrmed the validity ofa municipality's 30-day appeal window provides an oppotunity for the City to establish clear guidance on an aggrieved party's PH 952.227.1 I 00 . www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us . FX 952.227.111 0 77OO IYARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX i47. CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55517 DATE: Summary: Relevant Citv Code: 455 Court Appeal Deadline May 17,2022 Page2 ability to appeal a decision ofthe City Council. Providing this guidance is important as it allows increased transparency for the aggrieved party by explicitly informing them ofhow they can appeal a decision and when they will need to submit the appeal by' This guidance is also important for parties receiving an approval as it provides a window after which it is safe for them to invest substantial resources in a project where there is a potential for litigation. While the court decision in question specifically addressed variances, it is the opinion ofthe City Attomey that the reasoning applies to all zoning decisions made by the City. For this reason, staff has been advised to add a 30-day appeal limit to both the general Zoning Code and the section goveming variances. This provision, ifadopted, would establish the following framework for appealing City decisions: l) Appeal administrative decision to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals. a. All zoning decisions are subject to the 60-day rule. 2) Appeal decision ofthe Board of Adjustment, and Appeals to City Council. a. Must appeal decision of Board in writing within four business days. 3) Appeal decision of the City Council to district court. a. Must serve the City and all necessary parties within 30 days of decision (Proposed). It should be noted that not every decision goes before the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission can only decide matters when acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals as described in Section 20-29 ofthe City Code. In practice, most decisions go before the City Council with the Planning Commission providing a recommendation. Alternatives: I . Amend the Code to establish a 30day window for court appeals of City zoning decisions. Recommendation: Staff recommends Altemative I . The proposed ordinance would read as follows: Sec 20-l Decision of the Council All decisions by the City involving an approval under this chapter shall be final, except that any aggrieved person or persons shall have the right to appeat within thirty (30) days ofthe decision to the carver or Hennepin County District court. Any person seeking judicial review must serve the City and all necessary parties, including any landowners, within the thirty (30) day period defined above. Sec 20-29 Board Of Appeals And Adi ustments Variance And Appeal Procedures Form; fee. Appeals and applications for variances shall be filed with the community development director on prescrikd forms. A fee, as established by the City Council, shall a 456 Court Appeal Deadline May 17,2022 Page 3 be paid upon the filing ofan application. The Board of Adj ustments and Appeals may waive the application fee in unusual circumstances. b. Hearing. Upon the filing ofan appeal or application for variance, the community development director shall set a time and place for a hearing before the Board of Adjustments and Appeals on such appeal or application, which hearing shall be held within 45 days after the filing of said appeal or application unless the applicant waives the 60-day review period or the City exercises it right to extend the 60-day review period by up to an additional 60 days. At the hearing the board shall hear such persons as wish to be heard, either in person or by attomey or agent. Notice ofsuch hearing shall be mailed not less than ten days before the date of hearing to the person who filed the appeal or application for variance, and to each owner of property situated wholly or partially within 500 feet of the property to which the appeal or variance application relates' The names and addresses of such owners shall be determined by the community development director from records provided by the applicant. c. Decisions of the Board. The Board shall be empowered to decide appeals and grant variances, other than variances in conjunction with platting, site plan review, conditional use permits and interim use permits, when the decision of the Board is by an affrrmative vote of three-fourths ofthe members present. A vote ofless than three-fourths of the members present or any vote on a variance in conjunction with platting, site plan review, conditional use permits and interim use permits shall serve only as a recommendation to the City Council, who shall then make the final determination on the appeal or variance request within 30 days after receipt ofthe board's action. Ifthe Board recommends approval, it may also recommend appropriate conditions. The Board shall act upon all appeals and variance requests within 15 days after the date ofthe close ofthe required hearing. d. Appeal from fucisions of the Board. A City Council member, the applicant, or any aggrieved person may appeal such decision to the City Council by filing an appeal with the community development director within four days after the date of the Board's decision. e. Council action. By majority vote, the City Council may reverse, affirm or modifi, wholly or partly, the decision appealed from the Board, and to that end the City Council shall have all the powers of the Board, or the City Council may approve or deny the variance request. The Council shall decide all appeals within 30 days after the date ofthe required hearing thereon. In granting any variance, the City Council may attach conditions to ensure compliance with this chapter and to protect adjacent property. f. Action without decision If no decision is transmitted by the Board to the City Council within 60 days from the date an appeal or variance request is filed with the community development director, the Council may take action on the request, in accordance wilh the procedures goveming the Board, without fiuther awaiting the Board's decision or recommendation. g. Decision of the Council. All decisions by the City involving a variance or appeal shall be final, except that any aggrieved person or persons shall have the right to appeal within thirty (30) days of the decision to the Carver or Hennepin County District Court. Any person seeking judicial review must serre the City and all necessary parties, including any landowners, within the thirty (30) day period defmed above. 457 CITY OT CHAI'IHASSEN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO:City Council FROM: MacKenzieYoung-Walters,AssociatePlanner DATE: llur,e 13,2022 SUBJ: Nuisance Light PROPOSED MOTION: "The City Council adopts the proposed ordinance amending Chapters 13 conceming nuisance licht." The City Code states that light trespass in excess oftwo-tenths horizontal foot candles at four feet from the ground at the property line between the hours of 1 l:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. is a nuisance; however, the City has no practical means of measuring this and many typical residential activities likely violate this standard. Summart: The City's nuisance ordinance establishes a standard for light trespass that the City has no practical means of measuring. Additionally, staff believes that the established standard is low enough that many lights gpically present on residential properties likely exceed the limits stipulated in the ordinance. Other sections of the nuisance light ordinance use the general standard of"cause discomfort or annoyance" rather than establishing a specific foot-candle threshold for the light. Staffbelieves that the light trespass section should be amended to replace the foot-candle standard with the general language used for the other forms ofnuisance light. This will allow staffto respond to light trespass complaints without attempting to establish the foot candles present four feet from the ground at the property line and by taking into account unique features ofthe properties in question. Section 13-2(c)(24): Governs nuisance light on residential properties. Defines different types of nuisance light and when it is determined to be a nuisance. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 11OO I"IARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I4T.CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 555]7 I = I t Sfl[ Issue: Relevant Citv Code: 458 Nuesance Light Jrne 13,2022 Page 2 Analysis: The City Code lists three types of nuisance light: 1) direct glare; 2) intermittent light; and, 3) light trespass, and declares that these are nuisances ifthey negatively impact residential properties between the hours of I I :00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. In the case of direct glare and intermittent light, the threshold for being declared a nuisance is if it "causes discomfort or annoyance" between these hours. In the case oflight trespass, the standard is: "when the light produces two-tenths horizontal foot candles or more at approximately four feet from the ground or floor surface on other residential property at the property line." The issue with establishing a foot candle standard is that in order to determine iflight trespass is a nuisance, a light meter would need to be used. The City does not have a light meter nor is it typically viable to send staff to a site between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. to gather photometric data. There are also diffrculties in getting accurate information from light meters as they need to account for ambient light levels, i.e. the amount of light it will pick up at 11:00 p.m. during a full moon in the sky is different than what will be picked up at the same time during a new moon. While companies that specialize in photometric studies are skilled at compensating for these factors, the ability of a resident with a home light meter or an untrained staff member to conduct an accurate assessment is questionable. A concem with the established standard is that it is a very low threshold. One-foot candle ts defined as the amount of illumination the inside surface ofa one-foot-radius sphere would be receiving if there were a uniform point source ofone candela in the center of the sphere. One candela is roughly equivalent to the amount oflight produced by a single wax candle. Considering the brightness ofan average candle, it is likely that many common residential lights are brighter than two-tenths the brightness ofa single candle at the property line. Staff suspects that most motion activated flood lights, Christmas lights, and interior lights shining through windows in districts with smaller side yard setbacks exceed this threshold. Another concem is that the obscureness of the measurement standard means that neither residents nor staff can easily understand what level of lighting is or is not in compliance with the standard. Most people are simply not familiar with foot candles as a measurement unit and most lights list their brightness in lumens. This leads to homeowners installing lights having no idea if they are in compliance with the light ordinance and residents complaining about a neighbor's lights not actually being certain ifthey violate the standard. City staff is also unable to readily answer if a given lighting system will or will not violate the standard. A final concem is that since the measurement occurs at the property line, it does not take into account the unique features ofthe area. A neighboring structure may be setback 100 plus feet from the property line or have a line of evergteens between separating it from its neighbors. In these cases, the amount of light present at the property line may not have any relation to its actual impact on the neighbors. ln these cases, neighbors looking to harass another resident can utilize the letter ofthe Code to allege a nuisance is being created by light trespass that cannot reasonably be determined to impact them. 2 459 Nuesance Light Jlune 13,2022 Page 3 For these reasons, staffbelieves that the approach taken for determining if direct glare and intermittent light constitute a nuisance should be applied to light trespass. Using a standard of "causing discomfort or annoyance" for determining ifa nuisance is present allows staff to act as an impartial judge and determine if the lighting present is atypical or excessive. While this language is subjective, it is similar to language that is present throughout the nuisance ordinance. Code enforcement staff has extensive experience in dealing with situations where a determination must be made as to whether or not the condition of a property would be understood to cause discomfort or annoyance to the extent necessary to constitute a nuisance. Additionally, any resident who believes that City staff has made an incorrect determination as to the presence of a nuisance can appeal their determination to the Planning Commission. 1) No change. 2) Replace the foot candle standard with "causing discomfort or annoyance" for determining iflight trespass is a nuisance. Staff recommends Altemative 2 which would bring light trespass in line with the other categories of nuisance light. The proposed amendments would read as follows: Sec. l3-2(c)(24) (24) Nuisance light on residential properties. l. Definitions. In this section: l. Direct gldre means an excessive brightness contrast producing a sensation of visual discomfort resulting from insufficiently shielded light source in the field of view. 2. Intermittent light means any artificial light which flashes, revolves or fluctuates in such a manner that the variance is easily distinguished by personal observation. 3. Light source means a device (such as a lamp) which provides visible energy. 4. Light trespass means light emitted that is visible beyond the boundaries ofthe property on which the light source is located. 5. Person means an individual, firm, partnership, trustee, agent, association, corporation, company, governmental agency, club or organization of any kind. 2. Direct glare and light trespass declared a nuisance. Glare,light trespass and intermittent artificial light impacting on residential properties between the hours of 1 1:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., which cause loss of enjoyment, comfort or repose, and use ofsuch properties as determined under subsection l3-2(24)c. of this section is declared a nuisance. J Alternatives: Recommendation: 460 Nuesance Light lune L3,2022 Page 4 3. Nuisance determined. l. Light nespass shall be considered a nuisance when it impacts upon another residential property with such intensity as to cause discomfort or annoyance. line. 2. Direct glare shall be considered a nuisance when an artificial light source has not been properly located, shielded, directed or controlled, and as a result there is a direct line ofsight between the light source or its reflection and a point five feet above the ground or higher at the property line of other residential property if such intensity causes discomfort or annoyance. 3. Intermittent light shall be considered a nuisance when it impacts upon a habitable area ofother residential properry with such intensity and variance as to cause discomfort or annoyance. 4. Production of light nuisance prohibited.No artificial light source shall be installed, allowed to be installed or permitted on any property which light sources is an intermittent light source, or due to its intensity or physical characteristics, causes direct glare or trespasses onto a residential property in such a manner as to cause a nuisance during the hours of I 1 :00 p.m. through 7:00 a.m. 5. Responsibiliry. It shall be the responsibility of every installer of artificial lights and every owner or occupant of property on which artificial lights are installed to comply with subsection l3-2(24)d. of this section. 6. Exemptions. The provisions of subsections 13-2(24)d. and e. ofthis section shall not apply where: 1 . Such lights are caused to be installed by the federal, state or local government or agency, to light public ways or are.rs for public benefit; or 2. Such lights are required by law for safety reasons and there is no practical way to control them to eliminate the nuisance. g:\planvnw\issue pap€6 and reports (draits)huisance lightvluisance light issue paper.docx 4 461 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES MAY 17, 2022 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman von Oven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Noyes, Mark von Oven, Kelsey Alto, Perry Schwartz, Ryan Soller, and Edward Goff. MEMBERS ABSENT: Erik Johnson. STAFF PRESENT: MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner. PUBLIC PRESENT: None. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN CITY CODE TO INCLUDE CANTILEVERS IN THE LIST OF PERMITTED ENCROACHMENTS AND REMOVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OTHER CANOPIES Associate Planner Young-Walters gave a brief presentation on the item. Staff would like to formally add cantilevers to the list of encroachments in the City Code. Currently, they are under the “other encroachments” section which allows them to go up to 2.5 feet into the required yard setback. Staff also want to clarify that encroachments cannot stack as several creative builders over the years have tried. He noted the removal of another sentence that says other canopies require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) which should be a variance process. Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Schwartz seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the City Code concerning yard regulations. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN CITY CODE TO CLARIFY THE DIVISION CONCERNING FENCES Mr. Young-Walters gave a brief presentation on the item noting the addition of decorative fencing as it is also regulated. He explained the City cannot be stricter than the State Building Code when requiring building permits. The City Code states that fences 6 feet or higher need a building permit which is incorrect as the State standard is 7 feet; Staff would like to bring the City into compliance. He noted there have also been some issues with subdivision landscape buffers leading to some very frustrated residents. The intent of the ordinance is that roads have vegetation along them rather than a wall of fences and staff proposes amending the Code to say the fencing just needs to be on the 462 Planning Commission Minutes – May 17, 2022 2 inside of the vegetation rather than entirely outside of the buffer area so that homeowners will retain more usable yard. Mr. Young-Walters also spoke about fences in the Shoreland setback and to Staff on how fencing is defined as a structure which would not be in line with the intent of the Shoreland Ordinance. Commissioner Schwartz asked if this would affect invisible fences. Mr. Young-Walters replied it would not. Commissioner von Oven asked about shoreline fences and if they are now considered structures. Mr. Young-Walters clarified fences have always been considered structures and that is the reason Staff would like to clean up the Code as there is a conflict. City Code defines fences as structures and says fences on the lakeside of riparian properties cannot be over 3.5 feet high. He noted two ways to read that Code: first anything on the lakeside of a house cannot be over 3.5 feet and cannot go in the structure setback; the problem with this is swimming pools are required to have 5 foot fences. He stated situations where someone has a pool and cannot put a fence around it or cannot legally put a pool where the Code says they must. Staff has reconciled that by adopting the policy that the shoreland height restriction only applies to fences within the shoreland setback. Staff discussed proposals regarding fences and the position they took in the end, as there are aesthetic reasons for not wanting fences by the lakes, as well as environmental implications. The Code as currently written, in theory, goes all the way to the ordinary high water level. He clarified that Staff went with the stricter interpretation that would still allow pools in a yard. Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Noyes moved, Commissioner Schwartz seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the City Code concerning fences. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN CITY CODE CONCERNING THE NUMBER OF STORIES FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES IN THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RSF) DISTRICT Mr. Young-Walters noted the City used to allow both primary and accessory structures in the RSF district to be 40 feet height; the City changed that to 35 feet for single-family home primary structures and 20 feet for accessory structures. He stated every other accessory structure within the city has a story limit associated with the height limit but the RSF does not. He showed examples of a two-story versus a one-story structure, noting the intent was to allow a garage door for RV’s with a bonus room above, rather than a two-story structure. The City would be looking at stopping office space, party space, and potential apartment space from going in, as well as, the visual bulk and profile. He noted current structures will be grandfathered in. 463 Planning Commission Minutes – May 17, 2022 3 Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Noyes moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the City Code concerning accessory structure height in the RSF District. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN CITY CODE TO REMOVE THE PROHIBITION ON PAINTING CONCRETE, BRICK AND BLOCK Mr. Young-Walters noted this would amend the design standards for commercial, industrial, and office institutional buildings. Current Code does not allow painting of brick, block, rock or concrete unless it is used as an accent. He gave history on the Code noting 20 years ago the City had problems with owners not repairing chipped, flaking paint so the City looked at design standards and this provision was added. The goal is to allow flexibility and recognize improvements in paint technology. Staff recommends removing those prohibitions from the City’s design standards. The Commissioners discussed paint technology and quality of paint, as well as, clarifyed that paint is considered an architectural material which is in Section 20-1065. Mr. Young-Walters noted Staff would hang their hat on the language “weathering characteristics and ease of maintenance” and consider paint an architectural material. If the Planning Commission considers it of architectural importance, then Staff says it is, as well. Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Soller moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the City Code concerning design standards for commercial, industrial, and office institutional developments. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN CITY CODE CONCERNING RESTAURANTS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (BN) DISTRICT Mr. Young-Walters gave a presentation on the item, stating there is one neighborhood business district in the city. There are another five Planned Unit Developments (PUD) that have this as the underlying zoning; however in all of these the City has only listed restaurants as permitted uses. He pointed out the affected area, noting a daycare, the Legion, Bongards Creamery Headquarters, and the old Marathon gas station site. Mr. Young-Walters clarified none of the PUD that allow restaurants have generated a single complaint due to having a restaurant. He noted the Conditional 464 Planning Commission Minutes – May 17, 2022 4 Use Permit (CUP) requirement is just bureaucratic red tape for any restaurant looking to go in and is an extra $500 fee as well as an appearance before the Planning Commission and City Council. Staff recommends removing this and allowing restaurants to be permitted uses within this area as they do not believe any restaurant would have any greater impact than the current businesses. Commissioner Alto asked if a restaurant is separate from a bar. Mr. Young-Walters replied the City of Chanhassen does not allow bars and does not give intoxicating liquor licenses to exclusive liquor stores, which would be a bar. Therefore, they must have food service from the City zoning standpoint. Commissioner Alto asked about the brewery. Mr. Young-Walters noted the brewery does not have food service and is operating under a taproom license so they cannot serve intoxicating liquor. He noted a plain and simple bar could not go into any District within the city. Commissioner Soller would love to see that corner within the District be revitalized. Mr. Young-Walters agreed and said Staff would also love to see that area redeveloped. The Commissioners discussed the area impacted, differences between zoning districts, and options for businesses in the area. Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner von Oven moved, Commissioner Noyes seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the City Code concerning restaurants in the BN District. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN CITY CODE CONCERNING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LANDSCAPE SCREENING Mr. Young-Walters gave history, noting in 2004, the City made a change to the Zoning Code adding the Residential Low- and Medium-Density (RLM) District and removed the old Agricultural Preserve (A1) District. When the change was made, every reference to A1 was not removed and RLM was not added to every section that it should have been within the Code. One in particular that was missed was landscaping standards. As Mr. Young-Walters was looking, the R4 district seemed out of place, which is a District that allows both detached single-family homes and twin homes and falls within the category of a Low-Density District. City Code exempts single-family housing from most of the landscaping provisions (except density-related ones), and in reading through the provisions it says things like “x percentage of the total development value must be spent on plantings, there must be foundation plantings, etc.” These are intended for things like apartment 465 Planning Commission Minutes – May 17, 2022 5 complexes, industrial building, and large townhome projects. The City does not look at a single- family home and say they do not have $15,000 in hostas surrounding the house therefore are in violation of landscape standards. Staff felt it appropriate to make it explicit that a duplex or twin home would have the same exemptions as a standalone single-family home and not subject to those planting standards. He showed a table that breaks out how landscape standards between different zoning districts are treated. He explained the different densities of vegetation and landscape requirements, noting higher density locations require higher density vegetation. Mr. Young-Walters clarified what they are doing with this is saying those minimum planting and landscaping valuation standards do not apply to single-family housing. Commissioner Schwartz asked how the buffer yard examples factor in. Mr. Young-Walters replied if one goes by a wider buffer the City multiplies the plat by .4 and because the developer has granted more space between one development and another, they do not need as much density of plantings. Commissioner Schwartz asked if the City dictates the types of plantings. Mr. Young-Walter replied yes and no. They have a list of approved plants and the standards that require no more than 30% of the same family, 20% of the same genus, and 10% of the same species. Commissioner Goff asked Mr. Young-Walters to speak to the three alternatives and differences between them on Page 41. Mr. Young-Walters noted the first would have created a break between attached and detached housing types where duplexes would not be treated like detached single-family homes and instead would be treated like an apartment building. Staff is proposing Option 2, which concerns multi- family versus single-family. Attached units of three dwelling units or more will begin to be considered a townhouse or row house and would get the higher screening requirements. Regarding the Option 3, Mr. Young-Walters does not think it should be in here at all. This option would not have looked at housing types at all and instead makes all landscaping entirely dependent upon land- use guidance. He noted this is somewhat present anyways, because of the fact that none of these are exempt from the four-unit break or threshold. Option 3 is basically keeping the current system with no tweaking except cleaning up the Districts that do not exist. Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Goff moved, Commissioner Alto seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the City Code concerning residential development landscape screening. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN CITY CODE TO ADD A 30-DAY TIME LIMIT FOR COURT APPEALS OF ZONING DECISIONS 466 Planning Commission Minutes – May 17, 2022 6 Mr. Young-Walters stated the City Attorney has recommended the City amend City Code regarding this item. A district court case came down and another City had a premise saying if one disagrees with a City Council decision on a variance they have 30 days to appeal at the district court or it is final. He shared that someone tried to appeal a decision after that 30 days and the court said no and dismissed the appeal. The reason Staff would recommend this amendment is to provide a clear process, provide certainty for the developer or homeowner who requested the variance. This is helpful for all parties and clarifies the Statute of Limitations. The City Attorney recommended this for all of Chapter 20, not just for variances, as she believes the decision would hold for all zoning decisions. Therefore Staff is adding it to cover any decision by the City Council under Chapter 20. Chairman von Oven opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chairman von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Noyes seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the City Code concerning district court appeal deadlines. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Goff noted the summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated April 19, 2022 as presented. CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE: Mr. Young-Walters updated the Commissioners noting the City Council approved an amendment to the Dakota Retail Site Plan Agreement at a work session. Staff was directed to investigate the possibility of short-term rental licensing; the Erhart Farms subdivision was approved, as was the 855 Pleasant View Road subdivision. The City Council approved the Code amendment relating to outdoor storage of water craft but the April 1 to October 1 timeframe was approved. Mr. Young-Walters reminded the Commissioners that the next Planning Commission meeting has been cancelled. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Schwartz moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:19 p.m. Submitted by MacKenzie Young-Walters Associate Planner Prepared by Jean Steckling Senior Admin. Support Specialist 467 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item CenterPoint Energy Community Safety Grant Presentation File No.Item No: E.1 Agenda Section VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Presentation Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY Jeff Breeggemann and Bill Kallberg from CenterPoint Energy will be present to talk about the Community Safety Grant and present a check for $1,500. The resolution accepting the donation was approved on the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION 468 ATTACHMENTS 469 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Resolution 2022-XX: Adopt Resolution Vacating a Portion of Public Drainage & Utility Easements within the Pat Cunningham Plat; Final Plat Approval, Development Contract Approval, and Approval of the Plans and Specifications File No.Vacation Case No. 2021-03 Planning Case No. 2022-02 Item No: F.1 Agenda Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer Reviewed By Charlie Howley SUGGESTED ACTION “The Chanhassen City Council: Adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility easements within the Pat Cunningham plat, as shown on the attached Exhibit A; Approves the final plat for Cunningham Second Addition creating two single-family lots subject to the conditions of approval; Approves the Development Contract for Cunningham Second Addition; and Approves the plans and specifications." Motion Type Simple Majority Vote of members present Strategic Priority Development & Redevelopment SUMMARY In conjunction with the final plat approval, the applicant is requesting vacation of existing drainage and utility easements along the common property lines from the Pat Cunningham Addition, which was approved in 1979. The development is installing a public fire hydrant on the south side of Pleasant View Road at the entrance to the private street serving the development. BACKGROUND 470 The property owner of the proposed Cunningham Second Addition has requested the City vacate a portion of public drainage and utility easements dedicated with the Pat Cunningham plat along portions of Lots 2 and 3, Block 1. The drainage and utility easements on Lots 2 and 3 of the Pat Cunningham plat were originally recorded in 1979 and are being proposed to be re-recorded in association with the Cunningham Second Addition plat along the new property lines. Staff has reviewed the vacation and finds no need for the existing drainage and utility easements as depicted in the attached "Exhibit A" and believes the proposed drainage and utility easements associated with the Cunningham Second Addition plat are appropriate for this site. No existing public or private utilities, structures, or public appurtenances are within the requested vacation area. The easement vacation is conditioned upon recording of the final plat for the Cunningham Second Addition. On May 9, 2022, the Chanhassen City Council approved the preliminary plat for the two-lot subdivision with a variance for a private street and a neck lot. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting final plat approval for two lots and approval of the Development Contract and project construction plans and specifications. The existing drainage and utility easements would interfere with the proposed development of the property and are redundant since new easements will be recorded with the Cunningham Second Addition plat. A public hydrant will be extended to the south side of Pleasant View Road. The homes will be limited to access via a private street. Private stormwater improvements will be required with the construction of each new home. BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of a resolution granting the vacation of the portions of public drainage and utility easements as depicted in "Exhibit A"; approval of the final plat for Cunningham Second Addition subject to the conditions of the staff report; approval of the Development Contract; and approval of the plans and specifications for the project. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Vacating a Portion of Public Drainage & Utility Easements Staff Report Drainage & Utility Easement Legal Description Pat Cunningham Plat Proposed Cunningham Second Addition Plat Vacation Application Vacation Public Hearing Notice-Affidavit of Mailing Final Plat Submittal for Cunningham Second Addition Tree Preservation Plan Cunningham Second Addition Development Contract 471 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 13, 2022 RESOLUTION NO: 2022-XX_______________ MOTION BY:____________________SECONDED BY:__________________________ RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER A PORTION OF BLOCK 1, LOTS 2 AND 3, PAT CUNNINGHAM WHEREAS,Mary and Michael Meuwissen (“Applicants) have applied for vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility easements on their properties and legally described as follows: Lot 2 and Lot 3, all in Block 1, PAT CUNNINGHAM, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof (“Applicant Property”); WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851 the City Council of the City of Chanhassen has conducted a hearing preceded by the statutorily required two (2) weeks published and posted notice and mailed notice to the abutting property owners, to consider the vacation of the portion of public drainage and utility easements, legally described as follows: A 12 foot strip of land over those parts of Lot 2 and Lot 3, all in Block 1, PAT CUNNINGHAM, Carver County, Minnesota, which were dedicated as drainage and utility easement on said plat. The center of said strip is described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 3; thence southerly along the easterly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence continuing southerly 238.41 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence westerly along the south line of said Lot 3 to the east line of the west 6.00 feet of said Lot 3 and there terminating. The sidelines of said 12 foot strip shall terminate at the said east line and its southerly extension thereof. (hereinafter “Easement”); WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation, the City Council finds that the Easement is not needed for public purposes, Provided that the final plat of Cunningham Second Addition is recorded and provides the easements determined necessary by the City for public drainage and utility easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 472 2 1.The Easement for drainage and utility purposes is vacated conditioned upon the simultaneous recording of this Resolution with the final plat of Cunningham Second Addition. 2.The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas lines, sanitary and storm sewer lines, water pipes, mains, hydrants, and natural drainage areas thereon or thereunder, to continue maintain the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereof. 3.The City Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the County Auditor and County Recorder subject to the condition in Paragraph 1 of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of June, 2022. ATTEST: ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 473 CITY OT CIIAI'IHASSII'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO:Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager FROM: Bob Generous, Senior Planner DATE: June 13,2022 SUBJ:Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specification - Planning Case No. 2022-02 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting frnal plat approval for two lots and approval ofthe development contract and project construction plans and specifications. The existing drainage and utility easements would interfere with the proposed development ofthe property and are redundant since new easements will be recorded with the Cururingham Second Addition. BACKGROUIID On May 9, 2022, the Chanhassen City Council approved The preliminary plat for the two-lot suMivision with a variance for a private street and a neck lot. SUBDIVISION REVIEW The applicant is requesting final plat approval PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 PROPOSED MOTION: "The Chanhassen City Council approves: o Resolution vacating the existing drainage and utility easement on the properry; o Final Plat for Cunningham Second Addition creating two single-family lots subject to the conditions of approval; o Development Contract for Cunningham Second Addition; and o Plans and Specifications." 11OO I'4ARKET BOULEVARD . PO BOX I47 .CHANHASSEN .I.4INNESOTA 55317 474 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans Iume13,2022 Page2 s.!: F.'\-. -.tr--- t, I I \ .-.i"-,r].i ' 4, i. ..,.r^.ff .++; i-:td i-! ;-. - !l , ::-'-:". EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY The applicant provided an updated existing condition survey dated April 6, 2022 which encompasses Lots 2 and 3 ofthe Pat Cunningham subdivision. The updated existing condition survey w.rs requested during the preliminary plat review and appears to meet all applicable requirements from Section 1 8-40 of Ordinance. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS The preliminary plat provided illustrates mostly typical public drainage and utility easements (DUE) along the proposed suMivision's lot lines with a six-foot DUE along the side and rear lot lines and a lO-foot DUE along the front lot lines. Additional DUE are being proposed to encompass the wetland located in the southem portion of Lot l, Block I which encompasses the wetland buffer area along with additional DUE arormd a stormwater BMP on the north side of Lot 2, Block 1 . GRADING The site's existing and proposed grades generally slope to the east' The applicant is proposing grading for the development to occur over two phases as the preliminary plans indicate the lots are to be custom graded, which means during "Phase 1" mass grading will be conducted by the developer in order to construct the proposed private street, utility improvements and the private stonnwater BMPs, while the builder who will construct the homes will grade each lot as needed during "Phase 2". Because the lots will be custom graded, the final grading plans for each lot will be reviewed and approved during the building permit submiual in accordance with Chapter 475 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans June 13,2022 Page 3 7 of City Ordinance, however, the preliminary grading plan submitted is required to show the feasibility of the lots based on the requirements of Chapter 7 and Chapter I 8 . These requirements include separation from low floor elevations of the proposed homes to the highest known groundwater elevations, ensuring lowest building openings have enough freeboard from any emergency overflows adjacent to the homes, ensuring driveway grades are within limits set by Ordinance (0.5%-10%), ensuring drainage will be routed away from building pads, illustrating adequate erosion control measures are planned for, etc. The updated gading plans dated May 5, 2022, submitted for the final plat review, are in compliance with Section 7-19 and 18-40 of City Ordinance. DRAINAGE In the existing conditions survey, stormwater runoff generally flows from the west to the east. Stormwater leaves the site primarily by sheet flow through private property before entering public stormwater infrastructure along Fox Path Road. The proposed condition largely maintains existing drainage pattems but routes additional area (0.3 acres) to the northeast drainage discharge point. The proposed design uses surface grading to collect and convey the majority of the site's stormwater to two privately owned filtration basin best management practices (BMPS) which treat the stormwater before it discharges offsite. By collecting the stormwater into basins, some of the areas of sheet flow are converted to a more concentrated flow with potential impacts to downstream properties including altered drainage pattems, increased stormwater volumes, and erosion. The risk is amplified by the steep slopes ranging from 3:1 to 4: I that exist just downstream ofthe proposed discharge locations. The existing suruey wns updated to include areas to the east ofthe project to show how stormwater ultimately leaves the site. For both filtration basins, it was recommended during the preliminary plat review that the applicant consider additional measures to ensue there are no adverse impacts downstream. Possible solutions included additional site stabilization, grading, and a filtration berm to more closely mimic how stormwater leaves the site in the existing condition and reduce the risk of erosion. The final plat submittal construction plans dated May 5, 2022 included filtration berms, modified grading, and geotextile soil reinforcement that act to reduce downstream impacts. Soil stability computations were included in the updated Stormwater Management Report that show the revised design should not cause downstream erosion. Staff was informed on Jvte 1,2022 that the additional soil testing required by Riley Purgatory BluffCreek Watershed District found high water levels near the north basin that will impact the location and elevation ofthat filtration basin. As such, the design and construction plans will require modification. The applicant shall work with staffto incorporate additional measures as needed to mitigate downsEeam impacts from stormwater as the design is updated and final construction plans are completed. An updated Stormwater Management Report will be required for review. Additional soil stabilization computations may be required with the updated design. 476 PFOPOsEO FIL'FATlo'T BASIN PROPOSEO WOFK / \ .,1.'. - Ii I I r-"'-} I t ( T I t \ J -.\ a t\ .) ri lri lta t' u tt, ;li.li , i!; t tl,1i !( (, )I ) a EXrSIrlrG I{)H€S ry m t I EXISIII.IG II'EILAD ,t ( PROPOSEO FLTeAnO.r BASIN Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans Iwre 13,2022 Page 4 I \j I (I o|RECTON ITYPTCAL I a I .\*'' a $ \ { oRAtN Ctr BOUI\DAAES 477 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans lwte 13,2022 Page 5 RETAINING WALLS The applicant is proposing three retaining walls within the subdivision which appear to accommodate potential walkout desigrs for the custom graded lots along with the private stormwater BMP grading. No information was provided regarding the proposed retaining walls other than the call-out on the site plan indicating "proposed retaining wall by others". At a minimum, the plans must indicate the top and bottom elevations of the walls in accordance with Section 18-40(d) and a note indicating they are to be privately owned and maintained upon submittal offinal plat and final construction plans. The height ofany retaining wall is measured from the top ofthe wall to the bottom ofthe footing (not to the top of grade). Walls over 4 feet in height shall be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer and shall be constructed of a durable material (smooth face concrete, masonry/mortared, railroad ties and timber are prohibited). Two of the proposed retaining walls are preliminarily located within public (DUE), however, as the site is being proposed to be custom graded it is reasonable to require that retaining walls should be relocated outside of the DUE to maintain the intent and purpose of the public easement. EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one (l) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has prepared and submifted a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City for review. The SWPPP is a required submittal element for preliminary plat review along with the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan in accordance with Section 19-145 of City Ordinance. No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is developed. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements of the permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub-contractors are identified and as other conditions change. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. STREETS The proposed subdivision abuts Pleasant View Road to the north. Access to Lots I and 2, Block 1 ofthe proposed subdivision, along with the existing lot to the south, are proposed to be had from Pleasant View Road via a private street. Public Works/Engineering does not find it appropriate to construct a public steet as one is not required to serve other parcels, improve access, nor is a street extension in this area called for in the Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, no additional access should be had offPleasant View Road for the newly created lots as it is designated as a collector street. 478 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans lvne 13,2022 Page 6 The proposed private street has been designed to include an acceptable altemative to a hammerhead in order to meet Fire Code and City Ordinance regarding dead-end fire apparatus access road tumarounds. The private street will be required to use traffic control that is consistent with the current version of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffrc Control Devices, along with meeting the criteria listed out in Sec. l8-57.n, o., and p. Sec. l8-57.p.2 includes the requirement that covenants conceming maintenance and snowplowing operations shall be filed against all benefitting properties, which will include the property to the south not a part of the proposed subdivision. The proposed private street will provide access to the two lots as well as the house to the southwest. The applicant proposes naming the private street Beatrice Way. SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN The newly proposed subdivision will have access to adequate public sanitary sewer and water facilities within Pleasant View Road right-of-way. The plans illustrate tapping two new service lines for both sanitary and water which will be extended to Lot l, Block I ofthe proposed subdivision and to the existing lot to the south ofthe proposed suMivision, which is not a part of the proposed development. Updated plans were provided to illusfate municipal services extending to Lot 2, Block l, which will utilize the previously existing services to the lot prior to the proposed subdivision. The plans provided must be updated to address staffs' comments prior to the issuance ofa Notice to Proceed. Updates will include the location of taps within Pleasant View Road, the extents of the constnrction limits and restoration requirements within Pleasant View Road, a profile view ofthe private street, material types ofservice laterals, curb stop locations, etc. Comments have been provided to the applicant to address these concems and to bring plans into conformance with the most recent edition of the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates along with City Ordinances. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that "these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features." These standards include water quality treatment resulting in the removal of90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60yo tolal phosphorous (TP), and runoff rate control for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events. The proposed development is located within the fuley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) and is therefore subject to the Watershed's rules and regulations. A Stormwater Management Report dated March 18,2022 was submiued by the applicant to the City and watershed District as part of the preliminary plat review, and was updated on April 19,2022 and submitted as part of the final plat review. Conditional approval from the RPBCWD was received with the final plat submittal. The water quality rules appear to be met with the use of two on-site filtration basins. P8 modeling indicates 90% of TSS and 60% of TP is removed from the site. Water Quality 479 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans Iwrc 13,2022 Page 7 modeling will need to be updated as the plans progress towards final design. The applicant shall resubmit updated models in their native form prior to recording the final plat to confirm the City's water quality rule is met. The Stormwatff Management Repot and supporting Hydrologic and Hydraulic HydroCAD models were reviewed and found to be deficient for discharge rate analysis. Stormwater runoff leaves the project area in the proposed condition at three discharge locations, 1 .) North filtration basin,2.) Central area (primarily sheet flow), 3.) South filtration basin. The existing model needs to be updated to reflect how stormwater leaves the site through these three discharge points to effectively compare rate changes from the existing and proposed conditions. A more detailed analysis is required as stormwater leaving the site drains directly to private property where it has the potential to cause damage to downstream residents. The applicant shall update Hydrologic and Hydraulic models based on comments from City staff and provide satisfactory models and rate analysis prior to recording the final plat. The updated modeling conditioned during the preliminary plat review was not received with the frnal plat submittal. The applicant's design engineer did verbally commit to supplying updated models after revising the plans that impact the northern filtration basin. RPBCWD rules require 1 I inches of stormwater abstraction for all impervious area (new and existing) for the entire project area when over 50% ofthe project area is being disturbed. The proposed condition has an impervious area of 0.39 acres requiring 1573 CF of abstraction. The applicant demonstrated that the site met the RPBCWD requirements for a restricted site having soils with poor infiltration rates. As such, the required abstraction value was reduced to 0.55 inches for the impervious area or 786 CF. The Stormwater Management Report indicates that the project is accounting for 1266 CF of abstraction volume, demonstrating treatment to the maximum extent practicable. The filtration basin BMPs located on the two lots are to be privately owned and therefore will require an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement and associated plan. The plan identifies the maintenance schedule, responsible party, and should include information on how the system will be cleaned out including the filtration berm manifolds included in the final plat construction plans. The applicant must provide a signed O&M Agreement prior to the initiation of construction activities onsite. STORMWATER UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGES City Ordinance sets out the fees associated with surflace water management. A water quality and water quantity fee are collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. It is assessed at the rate in effect at that time; the 2022 rate for low-density residential is $8,830.00 per acre of developable land. 480 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans June 13,2022 Page 8 ASSESSMENTS Based on the proposal, the following fees would be collected with the Development Contract: a) Administration Fee: If the improvement costs are less than $500,000, 3% of the improvement costs: $2,325.45 Surface Water Management Fee: $8,830.00/acre of developable land: $29,833.48 A portion of the water hook-up charge @ $2,562/unt: $5,124.00 A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge @ $69l/unit: $1,382.00 Park Dedication Fee @ $5,800.00/unit: $5,800.00 f) GIS Fees @ $100 for the plat plus $30 per parcel: $160.00 WETLANDS The proposed plans show one wetland onsite that was delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental Services on November 10,2021. The associated wetland report was approved by the Wetland Conservation Act technical evaluation panel on February 9,2022. The report included a MNRAM assessment. The wetland was classified as a medium value wetland with a minimum buffer width requirement of20 feet and an average width of40 feet as outlined by Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) rules. The watershed rules are stricter than City regulations. The constuction plans dated May 5, 2022 show a wetland buffer that is consistent with Article VI, Chapter 20 of City Ordinance - Wetland Protection and appears to meet watershed regulations. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The developer meets minimum canopy coverage for tree preservation on the site. The developer is proposing to remove one tree on the site. Any additional removal will be subject to a 2:1 diameter inch replacement. All remaining trees will be required to be protected with tree preservation fencing throughout the entire construction process. PARKS AND TRAILS b) c) d) e) Park fees shall be collected for the new building lot. Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time1' 2022 rates for partial hookup fees are $691 .00 per unit for sanitary sewer and $2,562.00 per unit for water. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the building permit. FEES 481 REVIEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Buildine: 1. Building plans must provide suffrcient information to veriff that proposed building meets all requircments of the Mirmesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. *This condition still applies. 2. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. *This condition still applies. 3. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit mus be obtained prior to construction. *This condition applies. 4. If any soil corrections are done on the property, a final grading plan and soil report must be submitted to the Inspections DMsion before permits will be issued. *This condition applies. 5. Each lot must be provided with a separate sewer and water service. *This condition applies. Engineerine: 1. The final plat shall illustrate drainage and utility easements encompassing the entire wetland buffer prior to considering approval ofthe final plat. *This condition has been met and no longer applies. 2. A recent and updated existing condition survey must be provided with the final plat and final construction plans that is in conformance with the requirements of Sec. l8-40. *This condition has been met and no longer applies. 3. Updated grading plans in accordance with Chapter 7 and Chapter 18 must be provided with the final plat and final construction plans. *This condition has been met and no longer applies. 4. Updated grading plans shall indicate the top and bottom elevations ofthe proposed retaining walls in accordance with Section 18-40(d) upon submittal offinal plat and final construction plans. *This condition no longer applies. 5. Retaining walls shall not be constructed within public &ainage and utility easements and shall be privately owned and maintained. *This condition no longer applies. 6. Upon submittal ofthe final plat and final construction plans, the private street shall illusftate the use of traffic control devices that are consistent with the current version of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffrc Control Devices, along with meeting the criteria listed out in Sec. 18-57.n, o., and p. *This condition still applies. 7. Covenants concerning maintenance and snowplowing operations for the private sffeet shall be filed against all benefiuing properties, and must be recorded concurrently or prior to the final plat. *This condition still applies. Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans Jurre 13,2022 Page 9 482 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans Jvne 13,2022 Page 10 8. Utility plans shall be updated to address Lot 2's sanitary sewer and water services. *This condition has been met and no longer applies. 9. All plans shall be in conformance with the most recent edition of the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates along with City Ordinances. *This condition still applies. 10. The applicant shall enter into a Developmen t Contract with the City and pay all apolicable fees and securities prior to recording of final plat Atl-appueab+edeve}epn*en+ ivisioll. *This condition has been modified for clarity and still applies. 1. The applicant and their engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated May 5,2022 prepared by Matthew R. Pavek, PE with Civil Site Group, to fully satisfu staff concems. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to issuance ofthe Notice to Proceed for construction activities. l. The tumaround and road leading in will need to have No Parking Fire Lane sigrrs. *This condition applies. 2. A fue hydrant to service the new homes offthe private road must be in a position that would not block the entrance for other vehicles once the supply hose is connected. *This condition has been met Parks l. The developer shall pay Park and Recreation Fees for one new lot at the rate in effect at the time of final plat aPproval. *This condition shall be gqsd&! as follows: The developer shall pay Park and Recreation Fees of $5,800.00 prior to recording the final plat. Fire: Based on review of the final plat, Engineering is recommending the following additional condition: Environmental Resources: l. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. *This condition applies. 2. Developer shall notifr the City for inspection of tree fencing prior to starting any grading. *This condition applies. 3. Any trees removed that were desigr.ated for preservation on the Tree Canopy Plan dated December 8,2021 shall be replaced on site at a rate of2:l diameter inches. *This condition applies. Plannins: l. An Access and Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded for the private street. *This condition applies. 483 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans Jull,e 13,2022 Page I 1 2. The developer shall remove the construction debris from the drainage ravine in the southeast portion of kt 2, Block l, Cunningham Second Addition. *This condition applies. Water Resources: 1. The applicant shall provide a copy of conditional approval from the RPBCWD trefore the final plat submittal. *This condition has been met. 2. The applicant must update the Hydrologic and Hydraulic models per City and Watershed District comments, and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the final plat and final construction plans. *This condition still applies. 3. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed project will not adversely impact downstream properties. Justification in the narrative and additional computations as needed must be provided with the final plat and final construction plans. *This condition still applies. 4. The applicant shall update P8 water quality modeling and resubmit the models in their native form to confirm the City's water quality rule is met with the final plat and final construction plans. *This condition still applies. 5. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for any proposed privately-owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concurrently with the final plat. *This condition still aPPlies. COMPLIANCE TABLE Setbacks: 30-Foot Front and Rear; 10-Foot Side; Wetland 20-foot 25 13,750 # For flag lots or lots accessed via private slreet 125100#Code 15,000 2s /17,882 Corner lot, front will be private sfeet. 1.78 ac. lot area less private street 5,879 ft.1.64 ac.sq. ft.71,526 q. 145 33277,405Lot I Front will be private streeU * setback measued at point lot is 100 feet in width. 1 .58 ac. 348 2s /17,24240*68,967Lot2 3.36 acres146,372Total I setback buffer and 3O-foot buffer Arca (sq. ft)Depth (ft) Hard Cover %1q.ft Notes 484 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans June 13,2022 Page 12 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval ofthe final plat subject to the following conditions of approval, the development contract, and the plans and specifications: Buildine: l. Building plans must provide sufficient information to veri! that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 2. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be desigred by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. If any soil corrections are done on the property, a final grading plan and soil report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits will be issued. 5. Each lot must be provided with a separate sewer and water service. Eneineerine: 1 . Upon submittal of the final plat and final construction plans, the private street shall illusrate the use of traffrc control devices that are consistent with the current version of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffrc Control Devices, along with meeting the criteria listed out in Sec. 18-57.n, o., and p' 2. Covenants concerning maintenance and snowplowing operations for the private street shall be filed against all benefit properties, and must be recorded concurrently or prior to the final plat. 3. All plans shall be in conformance with the most recent edition of the City's Standard Specifications and Detail Plates along with City Ordinances. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Development Contract with the City and pay all applicable fees and securities prior to recording of final plat. 5. The applicant and their engineer shall work with city staff in amending the construction plans, dated May 5,2022 prepared by Matthew R. Pavek, PE with Civil Site Group, to fully satisfu staff concems. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to issuance of the Notice 1o Proceed for construction activities. 485 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans Jrme 13,2022 Page 13 Environmental Resources: l. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 2. Developer shall notifu the City for inspection of tree fencing prior to starting any grading. 3. Any trees removed that were desigrrated for preservation on the Tree Canopy Plan dated December 8,2021 shall be replaced on site at a rate of 2:l diameter inches. Fire: 1. The tumaround and road leading in will need to have No Parking Fire Lane signs. Parks: The developer shall pay Park and Recreation fees of$5,800.00 prior to recording the final plat. Plannine: 1. An Access and Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded for the private sreet. 2. The developer shall remove the construction debris from the drainage ravine in the southeast portion of Lot 2, Block I , Cunningham Second Addition. Water Resources: l. The applicant must update the Hydrologic and Hydraulic models per city and watershed District comments and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the final plat and final construction plans. 2. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed project will not adversely impact downstream properties. Justification in the narrative and additional computations as needed must be provided with the final plat and final construction plans. 3. The applicant shall update P8 water quality modeling and resubmit the models in their native form to confirm the City's water quality rule is met with the final plat and final construction Plans. 4. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for any proposed privately-owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concrurently with the final plat. ATTACHMENTS l. Resolution 2. Drainage and Utility Easement Legal Description 3. Pat Cunningham Plat 4. Proposed Cunningham Second Addition Plat 5. VacationApplication 486 Cunningham Second Addition: Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans June 13,2022 Page 74 6. Vacation Public Hearing Notice-Affidavit of Mailing 7. Final Plat Submittal 8. Tree Preservation Plan 9. Development Contmct glplan\2022 planning cases\22-02 855 pleasant view rd sub and var\cunningham 2nd addn final plat\cunningharn 2nd final plal and dc.docx 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Subscribed and sworn to before me thi�_,.._ day of_--'-��:::,...._ __ , 2 022. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on May 24, 2022, the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for the Vacation of Easements over a portion of Block 1, Lots 2 & 3, Pat Cunningham to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver and Hennepin Counties, .. Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. 495 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION OF A PORTION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER A PORTION OF BLOCK T, LOTS 2 AND 3, PAT CUNNINGHAM NoTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 13, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes $412.851 to consider the vacation ofa portion ofeasanent for public drainage and utility purposes on the property, located within Lot 2 and l,ot 3 all in Block 1, Pat Cunningham, Carver County, Minnesota according to the recorded plat thereof and depicted as follows: ---NE CqNER LO' 3 t I I I I & \o- dr .."",:s o],q! r,{- q ?. E q 6^ H^TCH D€NOIES ---.,irsrva{r ro 6€ ,/ vAcarED I H SOIJII{ERLY Ux€ of, LOI 5--'. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Erik R. Henricksen, PE, Project Engineer Phone: 952-227-1165 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on June 2 & 9,2022) 496 OBJECTID TAX_NAME TAX_ADD_L1 TAX_ADD_L2 1054910 DAVID L SLUIS 6550 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1054911 JEFF M WISTED 6540 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9280 1054917 KORD A BRASHEAR 6561 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9334 1054944 WILLIAM B & ELIZABETH MANNING 861 VINELAND CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9336 1055003 REBECCA CLAIR CHUVA 6521 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9282 1055016 DOUGLAS M & DARLENE K OLSEN 901 VINELAND CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9336 1055019 MICHAEL J EILERS 6560 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9280 1055034 VITO & MELANIE QUAGLIA 881 VINELAND CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9336 1055039 MICHAEL W JOHNSON 6540 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9332 1055042 LUCAS FILGUEIRAS DUARTE 921 VINELAND CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055043 JEFFREY SANDER 820 VINELAND CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9335 1055187 JAMES CONWAY 6495 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055204 ADAM FLETCHER 6551 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055205 TIMOTHY F BLAIR 2723 W PLUM HOLLOW DR ANTHEM, AZ 85086-1204 1055238 ZANE CASEY CAMPBELL DETERT 6500 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9332 1055242 RODNEY H PETERSON JR 6571 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9282 1055246 KURT M EHLERS 890 FOX CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055247 KARA WELLE 860 FOX CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9283 1055252 MARK J CAVIN 149 N LAKESHORE DR FONTANA, WI 53125-1120 1055253 MICHAEL L & REBECCA MCMILLEN 880 FOX CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9283 1055261 WALTER C LINDER 900 VINELAND CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055263 WILLIAM P JR & ANN K MILLER 6561 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9282 1055272 THOMAS C & KATHERINE M BENSON 840 VINELAND CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9335 1055296 PAMELA E LIBBY REV TRUST 6501 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055297 JUSTIN SIROTA 6471 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9281 1055298 DONALD R & CANDACE L DECOSSE 860 VINELAND CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9335 1055301 BRIAN THOMAS MCCAW 6511 NEW PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055307 JAMES P & NANCY FORD HOOPES 6511 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9282 1055308 JEFFREY N KIFFIN 6520 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9332 1055405 NATHAN D OMANN 800 FOX CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9283 497 1055417 BEDDOR ENTERPRISES LP 1010 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055419 ROBERT & RENAE FROEMMING 6411 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9278 1055422 MICHAEL A SLUIS 6430 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277 1055427 JOSEPH BAKALA 6441 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055432 THOMAS K & ANDREA L NARR 6431 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9278 1055439 CURTIS BINDER 6481 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9349 1055441 THOMAS & FOTINI DONNELLY 6491 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9349 1055443 KAYLA A HANUS 820 FOX CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9283 1055445 KELLY RAAB 840 FOX CT CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055446 PHILIP G & LEEANNE LARSEN 6493 NEZ PERCE DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9349 1055468 STEVEN D CLARK 6401 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055471 BOONSIEW YEOH 6410 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277 1055473 JUAN P ROSSI 6420 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055481 JOHN GOODMAN 915 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9545 1055490 GEORGE F & JANET M DEAN 6400 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9277 1055508 KELLY MARIE LEE 6421 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055585 ASHLEY ANDERSEN 6440 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055634 JERONE & EILEEN BARNES 6320 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8322 1055635 NATE RUFF 6341 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055637 JEANNE L KRAKER REVOCABLE TRUST 801 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055642 ALEXANDER EDWIN WESTLIND 825 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9545 1055695 MARJORIE K NAGEL REV TRUST 6340 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8322 1055715 OKSANA COX 6360 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055717 SOMASHEKARA HUCHAPPASWAMY 6381 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1055719 BROOKS & REBECCA HAGEN 6380 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8322 1055742 JOHN L & CHRISTINE M KLINKNER 6361 FOX PATH CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-8323 1055760 MICHELLE M BEDDOR 860 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1056276 REVOCABLE TRUST OF DAVID A BEDDOR 1050 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1056280 JOHN C FELTL 6290 RIDGE RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9438 1056285 DAVID MICHAEL GULLICKSON 830 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9545 1056286 RONALD H & JANICE M MASON 800 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9545 498 1056287 PETER SCHULTZ 790 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317- 1056288 EDWARD W SZALAPSKI JR 850 PLEASANT VIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-9545 499 CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITIONCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTASHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYV1.0UTILITY PLANC4.0ISSUED FOR: CITY RESUBMITTALDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP5000 GLENWOOD AVEGOLDEN VALLEY, MN 55422CONTACT: MATT PAVEK612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0C5.0C5.1CIVIL DETAILSSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC5.2CIVIL DETAILSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES2825 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTHMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407CONTACT: PAUL GIONFRIDDO, P.E.PGIONFRIDDO@HAUGOGTS.COM612-271-8185ACRE LAND SURVEYING, INC.9140 BALTIMORE ST NE, STE 100BLAINE, MN 55449CONTACT: ERIC R. VICKARYOUS763-458-2997ADOR BESPOKE HOMES350 HWY 7, SUITE 218EXCELSIOR, MN 55331CONTACT: TODD M. SIMNINGTODD@ADOR-HOMES.COM952-361-0832REMOVALS PLANC1.0500 REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.0SITE SURVEY............501 9 0 . 5 0 160.21S89°58'49"E667.00 S01°09'52"W 30.00N89°02'11"W110.64S41°42'48"E367.98S17°23'30"E144.97S00°57'49"W 114.11N83°18'47"E9 0 . 5 0N4 2 ° 4 3 ' 0 9 "E110.38N85°52'48"WFOR ALL FENCE REMOVALS OR PRESERVATIONSON LOT LINES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRMOWNERSHIP OF FENCE PRIOR TO REMOVAL ANDCOORDINATE WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER.REMOVE ALL EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES(THAT ARE NOT TO BE REUSED) PER PRIVATEUTILITY COMPANY AND CITY STANDARDSCONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT &REMOVE PUBLIC PVMTS., CURBS, ANDWALKS FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY WORK,REPLACE ALL MATERIAL, IN KIND, ANDTO CITY STANDARD AND APPROVALEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGDRIVEWAYEXISTING UTILITYSERVICES, PROTECTFOR RE-USEREMOVE EXISTINGSTREET SECTIONFOR UTIL INSTALL,REPLACE IN KINDVACATE EXISTINGD&U EASEMENTEXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPSCUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY,COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:DLTREE PROTECTIONN T S25'DRIPLINE WIDTHFURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ASSHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIPLINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA.POSTS AND FENCINGEXTEND FENCE 25'BEYOND DRIPLINEWHERE POSSIBLETREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP.TREE DRIPLINE, ORCONSTRUCTION LIMITS11.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ATNO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATERMANAGEMENT PLAN.3.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE ANDLOCAL REGULATIONS.4.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.5.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEARESTJOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.6.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHSTATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.7.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AREAPPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.8.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THEDURATION OF THE CONTRACT.9.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ONTHE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING,DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.10.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THEPLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. FOR ANY WORK ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY, THECONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TOANY WORK.11.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN AMANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.12.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.13.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT,DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITYMATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.14.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURINGNORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALLCIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.15.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALLINCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALLPUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BEPERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.16.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.17.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.18.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FORCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU.19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION ATNO COST TO THE OWNER.CITY OF CHANHASSEN REMOVAL NOTES:1.DURING THE COURSE OF GRADING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IF ANY DRAIN TILEIS DISCOVERED, THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER ANDSHALL RELOCATE OR ABANDON THE DRAIN TILE AS DIRECTED.502 LOT LINE (TYP.)EXISTINGPROPERTY LINE(TYP.)10' STRUCTURESETBACK (TYP.)STRUCTURESETBACK (TYP.)30' STRUCTURESETBACK (TYP.)LOT 1LOT 2BIT. PVMT.,TYP20.0'20.0'R28.0'20.0'FUTUREBUILDING (TYP.)FUTUREBUILDING (TYP.)FUTURE DRIVE(TYP.)CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSABOVE GROUNDBIOFILTRATION BASIN 2BOT=980.00100 YR HWL=983.33EOF=983.49DT ID=977.50IE STONE=976.90SEE DETAIL 1 C5.1ABOVE GROUNDBIOFILTRATION BASIN 1BOT=990.00100 YR HWL=993.27EOF=993.50DT ID=987.50IE STONE=986.90SEE DETAIL 1 C5.110' SETBACKWETLAND 1TYPE 5 (PUBF)RPBCWD MEDIUM -VALUE WETLANDEX./PROP NWL=988PERMANENT,FREE-STANDINGWETLAND BUFFERMARKERSEE DETAIL 2 C5.1PROPOSED CREATEDWETLAND BUFFER50.4' 20.0'(MIN I M U M )49.7'PERMANENT,FREE-STANDINGWETLAND BUFFERMARKERSEE DETAIL 2 C5.1MEDIUM VALUE WETLANDREQUIRED BUFFER WIDTH = 40'40' BUFFER AREA = 11,255 SQFTMINIMUM BUFFER WIDTH = 20'TYPICAL BUFFER WIDTH = 50'MINIMUM BUFFER WIDTH = 20'BUFFER AREA PROVIDED = 11,275 SQFTCONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.PATCH EXISTINGPAVEMENT PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.FUTURE DRIVE(TYP.)30.0'1 0 0 . 0 '30.0'60.0'60.0'10.0'30.0'30.0'30.0'10.0'DRIVEWAYEASEMENT923 SQFT ROCKINFILTRATION90 SQFT ROCKINFILTRATION1,173 SQFT ROCKINFILTRATION90 SQFT ROCKINFILTRATION9 0 . 5 0 160.21S89°58'49"E667.00 S01°09'52"W 30.00N89°02'11"W110.64S41°42'48"E367.98S17°23'30"E144.97S00°57'49"W 114.11N83°18'47"E9 0 . 5 0N4 2 ° 4 3 ' 0 9 "E110.38N85°52'48"WCUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN............SITE AREA TABLE:SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPROPERTY LINELIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE).SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL 6, C5.1.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNINGCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALLOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OFCONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING ARIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDINGAND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFFOOTING MATERIALS.6.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS AREAPPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BYTHE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENTMATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS,BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THERIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.9.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIORTO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.11.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.12.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENTSECTIONS.13.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THEDRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.CITY OF CHANHASSEN SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.IF HAULING FROM/TO A SITE IN CHANHASSEN WITH 50 CY OR MORE OFMATERIAL A SEPARATE GRADING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THAT SITERPBCWD SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED,INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATESTEXTENT POSSIBLE.2.SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAININGPERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BEDECOMPACTED TO ACHIEVE:2.1.A SOIL COMPACTION TESTING PRESSURE OF LESS THAN 1,400KILOPASCALS OR 200 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH IN THE UPPER 12INCHES OF SOIL OR2.2.a BULK DENSITY OF LESS THAN 1.4 RAMS PER CUBIC CENTIMETER OR976 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT IN THE UPPER 12 INCHES OF SOIL.3.IN ADDITION, UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATIONMUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHERSTABILIZATION OF THE SITE.4.INFILTRATION FACILITIES MUST NOT BE EXCAVATED TO WITHIN 3 FEETFINAL GRADE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEENCONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED. ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT INAN INFILTRATION FACILITY MUST BE REMOVED IN MANNER THATPREVENTS COMPACTION OF THE FACILITY BOTTOM. TO PROVIDE AWELL-AERATED, HIGHLY POROUS SURFACE, THE SOILS BELOW ANINFILTRATION PRACTICE MUST BE LOOSENED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18INCHES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR PLANTING.5.TOPSOIL TO BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE SITE RESTORATION MUSTCONTAIN AT LEAST 5 PERCENT ORGANIC CONTENT CONSISTENT WITH THEDISTRICT'S TOPSOIL DEFINITION. .6.All EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATIONMEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY ANDEFFECTIVENESS. ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS MUST BE REPAIRED,REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF DISCOVERY ANDPRIOR TO THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT UNLESS ADVERSECONDITIONS PRECLUDE ACCESS TO THE RELEVANT AREA OF THE SITE, INWHICH CASE THE REPAIR MUST BE COMPLETED AS SOON AS CONDITIONSALLOW. WHEN ACTIVE LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ARE NOT UNDERWAY, THESE RESPONSIBILITIES MUST BE PERFORMED AT LEAST WEEKLYUNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDERTHIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST MUST BEMAINTAINED.503 LOT 1LOT 2CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSABOVE GROUNDBIOFILTRATION BASIN 2BOT=980.00100 YR HWL=983.33EOF=983.49DT ID=977.50IE STONE=976.90SEE DETAIL 1 C5.1ABOVE GROUNDBIOFILTRATION BASIN 1BOT=990.00100 YR HWL=993.27EOF=993.50DT ID=987.50IE STONE=986.90SEE DETAIL 1 C5.1WETLAND 1TYPE 5 (PUBF)RPBCWD MEDIUM -VALUE WETLANDEX./PROP NWL=98850.4' 20.0'(MIN I M U M )49.7'9 0 . 5 0 160.21S89°58'49"E667.00 S01°09'52"W 30.00N89°02'11"W110.64S41°42'48"E367.98S17°23'30"E144.97S00°57'49"W 114.11N83°18'47"E9 0 . 5 0N4 2 ° 4 3 ' 0 9 " E 110.38N85°52'48"WSB-1SB-2SB-4SB-3SB-6SB-5CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN............GENERAL GRADING NOTES:2.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSGROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF CHANHASSEN GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 2' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, DATED 01-13-22NO GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ANY SOIL BORINGSSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS, (FFE, LFE, GFE), PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BY CROSS CHECKING WITHARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ELEVATIONS FOR EQUIVALENT "100" ELEVATIONS. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TOEXCAVATION AND INSTALLATION OF ANY FOOTING MATERIALS. VERIFICATION OF THIS COORDINATION SHALL BE CONFIRMED INWRITING BY CIVIL, SURVEYOR, ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.3.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOILCORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALLSOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORCOORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.5.ANY ELEMENTS OF AN EARTH RETENTION SYSTEM AND RELATED EXCAVATIONS THAT FALL WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WILLREQUIRE A “RIGHT OF WAY EXCAVATION PERMIT”. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AQUIRING THIS PERMIT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION6.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.7.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGEELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.8.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.3.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINEDAREAS IS 4:14.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BEDESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TOESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADESACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.6.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITETO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.7.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED INEMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS,WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO AMINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.8.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDINGADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS ORSLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVEBEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALLAREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREASDISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.9.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BEAT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILSENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADESOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.10. TOLERANCES10.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW,THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.10.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.10.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION,UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.10.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.11.MAINTENANCE11.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH ANDDEBRIS.11.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES.DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BEESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.11.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER,CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.NOTE:·LOTS ARE CUSTOM GRADED LOTS AND FINALGRADING PLANS WILL BE COMPLETED AT TIME OFLOT DEVELOPMENT AND FINALIZED HOUSE PLANS.RPBCWD SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY AND SOIL CONDITIONS MUST BE PROTECTED,INCLUDING RETENTION ONSITE OF NATIVE TOPSOIL TO THE GREATESTEXTENT POSSIBLE.2.SOIL SURFACES COMPACTED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMAININGPERVIOUS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION MUST BEDECOMPACTED TO ACHIEVE:2.1.A SOIL COMPACTION TESTING PRESSURE OF LESS THAN 1,400KILOPASCALS OR 200 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH IN THE UPPER 12INCHES OF SOIL OR2.2.a BULK DENSITY OF LESS THAN 1.4 RAMS PER CUBIC CENTIMETER OR976 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT IN THE UPPER 12 INCHES OF SOIL.3.IN ADDITION, UTILITIES, TREE ROOTS AND OTHER EXISTING VEGETATIONMUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL FINAL REVEGETATION OR OTHERSTABILIZATION OF THE SITE.4.INFILTRATION FACILITIES MUST NOT BE EXCAVATED TO WITHIN 3 FEETFINAL GRADE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEENCONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED. ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT INAN INFILTRATION FACILITY MUST BE REMOVED IN MANNER THATPREVENTS COMPACTION OF THE FACILITY BOTTOM. TO PROVIDE AWELL-AERATED, HIGHLY POROUS SURFACE, THE SOILS BELOW ANINFILTRATION PRACTICE MUST BE LOOSENED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 18INCHES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR PLANTING.5.TOPSOIL TO BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE SITE RESTORATION MUSTCONTAIN AT LEAST 5 PERCENT ORGANIC CONTENT CONSISTENT WITH THEDISTRICT'S TOPSOIL DEFINITION. .6.All EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABILIZATIONMEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE INTEGRITY ANDEFFECTIVENESS. ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS MUST BE REPAIRED,REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF DISCOVERY ANDPRIOR TO THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT UNLESS ADVERSECONDITIONS PRECLUDE ACCESS TO THE RELEVANT AREA OF THE SITE, INWHICH CASE THE REPAIR MUST BE COMPLETED AS SOON AS CONDITIONSALLOW. WHEN ACTIVE LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ARE NOT UNDERWAY, THESE RESPONSIBILITIES MUST BE PERFORMED AT LEAST WEEKLYUNTIL VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED. A LOG OF ACTIVITIES UNDERTHIS SECTION FOR INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT ON REQUEST MUST BEMAINTAINED.GRADING LIMIT -TREES PROTECTED504 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSABOVE GROUNDBIOFILTRATION BASIN 2BOT=980.00100 YR HWL=983.33EOF=983.49DT ID=977.50IE STONE=976.90SEE DETAIL 1 C5.1ABOVE GROUNDBIOFILTRATION BASIN 1BOT=990.00100 YR HWL=993.27EOF=993.50DT ID=987.50IE STONE=986.90SEE DETAIL 1 C5.1WETLAND 1TYPE 5 (PUBF)RPBCWD MEDIUM -VALUE WETLANDEX./PROP NWL=9889 0 . 5 0 160.21S89°58'49"E667.00 S01°09'52"W 30.00N89°02'11"W110.64S41°42'48"E367.98S17°23'30"E144.97S00°57'49"W 114.11N83°18'47"E9 0 . 5 0N4 2 ° 4 3 ' 0 9 " E 110.38N85°52'48"WCONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT &REMOVE PUBLIC PVMTS., CURBS, ANDWALKS FOR INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.UPON COMPLETION OF UTILITY WORK,REPLACE ALL MATERIAL, IN KIND, ANDTO CITY STANDARD AND APPROVALCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALLTHE UTILITY SERVICES WITH BOTH THECIVIL AND MECHANICAL PLANS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.SEE DEMO PLANFOR ALL EXISTINGUTILITY REMOVALINFORMATIONCLEANOUTTOP=1005.75INV=991.14CLEANOUTTOP=1008.57INV=992.64CLEANOUTTOP=1005.75INV=991.291" WATERSERVICE DIP1" WATER SERVICEDIP59 LF 6" SDR-26SANITARYSERVICE @ 2.00%HYD & GV,TYP.21 LF 6" SDR-26SANITARY SERVICE@ 2.0%OL11RE=992.50IE 12" OUTLET=987.50IE 6" DT=987.5030 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 1.67%6" PERFORATEDDRAIN TILE6" IE=987.506" PERFORATEDDRAIN TILE6" IE=977.5025 LF 12" HDPESTORM @ 2.0%OL21RE=982.50IE 12" OUTLET=977.50IE 6" DT=977.50 CONNECT TOEXISTING WATERMAIN, W/ 1" CORPCOORD. WITH CITYSTUB SANITARYIE @ STUB=993.75COORD. W/MECH'LSTUB SANITARYIE @ STUB=993.08COORD. W/MECH'L1" CURB STOPAND BOXMAKE CONNECTION TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERWITH 8"X6" WYE W/ SADDLEEX IE (E/W)=989.86 (FIELD VERIFY)PROP IE (E)=990.11COORDINATE WITH CITYMAKE CONNECTION TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERWITH 8"X6" WYE W/ SADDLEEX IE (E/W)=989.67 (FIELD VERIFY)PROP IE (E)=989.92COORDINATE WITH CITYEXISTING SANITARY ANDWATER SERVICE FOR LOT 2(FIELD VERIFY) COORDINATEWITH CITY30' ENERGY DISSIPATERMANIFOLD, SEE DETAILIE=977.00SEE DETAIL 3, C5.130' ENERGY DISSIPATERMANIFOLD, SEE DETAILIE=987.00SEE DETAIL 3, C5.1CONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAIN WITH 6" WETTAP AND GATE VALVECOORD. WITH CITY75 LF 6" SDR-26SANITARYSERVICE @ 2.00%CLEANOUTTOP=1008.54INV=992.7937 LF 6" SDR-26SANITARYSERVICE @ 2.00%61 LF 6" SDR-26SANITARYSERVICE @ 2.00%75 LF 6" SDR-26SANITARYSERVICE @ 2.00%CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN............GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLERIP RAP1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINEINSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866)UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PIPE TO BE N-12AS MANUFACTURED BY ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS OR APPROVED EQUAL9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THEFINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TOMAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALLBE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OFTHE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TOSIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROADCLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALLOWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFICLOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATIONSLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPONCOMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTSMUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED INACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACH DIRECTION.SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS.CITY OF CHANHASSEN UTILITY NOTES:1.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STORM SEWER SHALL BE GROUTED TO THENEW STRUCTURE SUCH THAT THERE ARE NO LEAKS.505 CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.0CIVIL DETAILS............506 CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.1CIVIL DETAILS............TYPICAL SECTION VIEW1.INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TOPREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION.2.ALL DOWN-GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENTLAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS.3.PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.4.INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINALGRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE.5.ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINSLEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROMCLOGGING.6.PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS.7.PLANT ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE.8.CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA.9.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES.10.PLANT AND/OR ROCK MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE.11.REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA ISADEQUATELY VEGETATED.GENERAL NOTES1.IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWINGEXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUINGCONSTRUCTION.2.GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW-COMPACTION EARTH-MOVINGEQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS.3.ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCINGFABRIC WRAP TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM WITHCONTECH C-40 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE6" PERF. CPP DRAIN TILE PIPE PERMNDOT 3245 WITH FABRIC SOCK.LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS3:1 GRADE24" MIN. 0.6'ABOVE GROUND FILTRATION BASINN T SMIN.PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24"WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME):70% HOMOGENOUS CONSTRUCTION SAND30% ORGANIC COMPOSTFREE DRAINING ANGULAR WASHED STONE 3/4" - 2" PARTICLESIZE INSTALL TO MIN. 95% STANDARD DENSITY PER AASHTO T99.1WETLAND BUFFER SIGN (TYP)N T S2ENERGY DISSIPATION MANIFOLDN T SSIDE VIEWFRONT VIEW12" PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITHMANUFACTURER'S STANDARDPERFORATION PATTERN.PERFORATIONS MUST BE SUFFICIENTTO EQUAL 12" OPEN ORIFICE.6.5 C.Y. CL II RIP RAP, INSTALL FOREROSION CONTROLEND CAP, TYP.312" PVC @ 2.0% TYP.3:1 MIN SLOPE3:1 MIN SLOPE3:1 MIN SLOPE3:1 MIN SLOPEIN-SITU SOILIN-SITU SOILPERFORATEDDISPERSON PIPE ALONGTOE OF FILTRATIONBASINN T SOUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE - OL11N T SFLOW12" OUTLETPIPEINV. = 987.50STEPS -INSTALL ONDOWNSTREAMSIDE @ 16"O.C.PRECASTCONCRETESTRUCTUREPRECASTCOVER 8"THICKPRECASTBASE 8"THICKHALA GRATECASTINGRIM ELV. =992.5048"FLOW6" INLET PIPEINV. =987.504OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE - OL31N T SFLOW12" OUTLETPIPEINV. = 977.50STEPS -INSTALL ONDOWNSTREAMSIDE @ 16"O.C.PRECASTCONCRETESTRUCTUREPRECASTCOVER 8"THICKPRECASTBASE 8"THICKHALA GRATECASTINGRIM ELV. = 982.5048"FLOW6" INLET PIPEINV. = 977.505LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTX" CLASS 5 AGGREGATESUBBASE (MNDOT 3138)X" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B)TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357)X.X" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B)COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARDPROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY)N T SNOTE:THICKNESSES PERGEOTECH SPEC64-FOOTMIN. BERM/EOF3:1 GRADEEOF FLOW PATH OVER BERM507 CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS50.4' 20.0'(MINI M U M )49.7'CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEPERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, SEE DETAILCONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.STAKE OFF AND MARKPROPOSEDINFILTRATION BMPLOCATIONS; SEE NOTESTAKE OFF AND MARKPROPOSEDINFILTRATION BMPLOCATIONS; SEE NOTEPROPOSEDSTOCKPILE LOCATIONAS NEEDEDCUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS............01" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"N1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF CHANHASSEN EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SWPPP NOTES:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS,48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTORSHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THEOWNER.2.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILLREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3.SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING ANDEROSION CONTROL NOTES.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPPIMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITHNPDES PERMIT.1. INFILTRATION FACILITIES: PREVENT SOIL COMPACTION AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT,STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS, AND TRAFFIC. BEST PRACTICES MUST BE DEPLOYEDTO PREVENT SEDIMENT AND OTHER MATERIAL FROM ENTERING THE PRACTICES.INFILTRATION FACULTIES MUST NOT BE EXCAVATED TO WITHIN 3 FEET FINAL GRADEUNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLYSTABILIZED.RPBC WATERSHED EROSION CONTROL NOTES:508 LOT 1LOT 220.0'20.0'R 2 8 . 0 '20.0'CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS10' SETBACK50.4' 20.0'(MIN I M U M )49.7'30.0'1 0 0 . 0 '30.0'60.0'60.0'10.0'30.0'30.0'30.0'10.0' 9 0 . 5 0 160.21S89°58'49"E667.00 S01°09'52"W 30.00N89°02'11"W110.64S41°42'48"E367.98S17°23'30"E144.97S00°57'49"W 114.11N83°18'47"E9 0 . 5 0N4 2 ° 4 3 ' 0 9 "E110.38N85°52'48"WCONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEPERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, SEE DETAILPLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)PLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.STAKE OFF AND MARKPROPOSEDINFILTRATION BMPLOCATIONS; SEE NOTESTAKE OFF AND MARKPROPOSEDINFILTRATION BMPLOCATIONS; SEE NOTEPROPOSEDSTOCKPILE LOCATIONAS NEEDEDCUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS............01" = 30'-0"30'-0"15'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF CHANHASSEN EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SWPPP NOTES:LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKETALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS,48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTORSHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THEOWNER.2.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILLREQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROLPERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.3.SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROLNOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING ANDEROSION CONTROL NOTES.5.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPPIMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITHNPDES PERMIT.ROCK MULCH/RIP-RAPLAWN - SODNATURALIZED SEED MIXGEOTEXTILE (ADD TOSEED MIX HATCH)509 CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILS............TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL.SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES,10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROMTRENCHOVERLAP: BURY UPPER ENDOF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A'AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OFTOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE.EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTINGBURIED IN SILT TRENCH ANDTAMPED. DOUBLEROW OFSTAPLES.PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APARTTO KEEP MATTING FIRMLYPRESSED TO SOIL.'D''C''B'BURY THE TOP END OF THEMATTING IN A TRENCH 4" ORMORE IN DEPTHTYPICAL STAPLE #8GAUGE WIRE1 1/2"10"OVERFALL'E''A'NOTE:1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TOKEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TOSOIL.EROSION BLANKETN T S3510 CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.3SWPPP - NARRATIVE............OWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING SECTION 21PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENTSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THEPROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM.AREAS AND QUANTITIES:SWPPP CONTACT PERSONCONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING:ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY APERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THENPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT.TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THECONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPPNOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACTQUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.PROJECT NARRATIVE:PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING HOME WITH A DRIVEWAY. THE PROPOSED SITE IS A LOT SPLIT INTO 2 SINGLE FAMILY PARCELSWITH ASSOCIATED HOMES, DRIVEWAYS, SITE GRADING, UTILITY, AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS.NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE:A MINIMUM 20' BUFFER WITH AREA EQUAL TO 40' BUFFER (11,255 SQFT) WILL BE CREATED AROUND WETLAND 1.SOIL CONTAMINATION AND INFILTRATION NARRATIVE:SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BE IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED. SINCE NO CONTAMINATION EXISTS, INFILTRATION IS FEASIBLE AS LONG AS SOIL TYPEIS CONDUCIVE TO INFILTRATION.SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED):THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO LOTUS LAKE - LOTUS LAKE IS IDENTIFIED AS AN IMPAIRED WATER BODY PER THE MPCA'S303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. THIS PROJECT IS ALSO WITHIN ONE MILE OF CHRISTMAS LAKE, SILVER LAKE, AND LUCY LAKE. LOTUS LAKE ANDSILVER LAKE ARE THE ONLY IMPAIRED LAKES IN THE VICINITY.LOTUS LAKE IS IMPAIRED FOR FISHES BIOASSESMENTS AND MERCURY LEVELS ANDNUTRIENTS. SILVER LAKE IS IMPAIRED FOR NUTRIENTS. BECAUSE LOTUS LAKE AND SILVER LAKE ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE,BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS:1.DURING CONSTRUCTION:A.STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETEDLATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THATSERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC:PERMANENT SEED MIX·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX.··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PERACRE.··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE.·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THECONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER):CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE:ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLISTATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMSATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E.TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPPTRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAINSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMANDATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12RE-CERTIFICATION: 2/27/2020 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2023THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCALGOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL.STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSSWPPPTHE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A:CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLBMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14)7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S13. INSTALL STREET SECTION14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.)19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.RECORDS RETENTION:THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONALCONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS.ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANYRECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT.1.THE FINAL SWPPP;2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT;3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11, INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE);4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUALMAINTENANCE; AND5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OFBMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS INACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDETRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ORAS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE:4.1.NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OF THE PERMIT.4.2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING.4.3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING.5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTSSWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6):1.ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUSTINCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.2.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN,CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BYTHE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS ORGROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THEOBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7):1.PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURERSPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES.EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8):1.BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.2.PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASINGAND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING).3.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY ORTEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THECONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARYSTOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENTCONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE.4.FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSEDSOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD.5.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURSAFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDARDAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES.6.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK-DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOTNEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES7.PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENTSYSTEM.9.PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11.SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9):1.PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB ANDGUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENTLAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER.2.IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3.3.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK-CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS.4.A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERMCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAINTO A SURFACE WATER.5.PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELYAFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE.6.PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THEINLET.7.PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY(E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER.9.PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACEFOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATEDWITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITEDBY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, ANDSEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THATRETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVALDESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATEDSTORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10):1.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED ANDNUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACEWATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES.2.IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL-WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TODISCHARGE.3.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS ORINUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND.4.IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, ORINCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11):1.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS.2.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS.3.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR,REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6.PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA.4.DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION ANDSEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THEAREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL,REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OFOBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK INSURFACE WATERS.5.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKEDSEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARDTO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS.6.PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.7.PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.8.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B.9.PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS:a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; ORb.WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; ORc.WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, ORUPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE:a.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; ANDb.NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; ANDc.ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; ANDd.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); ANDe.DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAINGAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES;ANDf.IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDEDSOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); ANDg.ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS.POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12):1.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TOMINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BEEXPOSED TO STORMWATER.2.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TOMINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES,ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITHMINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE.4.PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035.5.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041.6.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADEDINCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT ANAPPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UPMEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE.7.PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLYEFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS ANDOTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THECONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEESMUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13):1.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE.2.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) ANDSTORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSIONDATE OF THE NOT.3.PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIALVEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUSSURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER.4.PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED.5.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.6.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE INPLACE.7.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROLIS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER.8.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTINGTHE NOT.SEED NOTES:ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TO ALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDINGTHE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES.TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET.SEED·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT ASEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE.MULCHIMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, NON-STRAW MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGESLOPES·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS.ADOR BESPOKE HOMES350 HWY 7, SUITE 218EXCELSIOR, MN 55331CONTACT: TODD M. SIMNINGTODD@ADOR-HOMES.COM952-361-0832511 CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS............ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTPROJECT NAME: CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITIONPROJECT LOCATION (BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURS. INCLUDE ADDRESS IF AVAILABLE.)ADDRESS: 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROADCITY OR TOWNSHIP: CHANHASSENSTATE: MNZIP CODE: 55317LATITUDE/LONGITUDE OF APPROXIMATE CENTROID OF PROJECT: 44.88716 N, -93.54341 EMETHOD OF LAT/LONG COLLECTION (CIRCLE ONE): GPS ONLINE TOOL USGS TOPOGRAPHICALL CITIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: CHANHASSENALL COUNTIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: CARVERALL TOWNSHIPS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: N/APROJECT SIZE (NUMBER OF ACRES TO BE DISTURBED): 2.0PROJECT TYPE (CIRCLE ONE): RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL & RD CONSTRUCTION OTHER (DESCRIBE):CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (TO THE NEAREST TENTH ACRE)EXISTING AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE : 0.1POST CONSTRUCTION AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 0.4TOTAL NEW AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 0.3RECEIVING WATERSWATER BODY IDNAME OF WATER BODY WATER BODY TYPE SPECIAL WATER? (Y/N) IMPARIED WATER (Y/N)10-0006-0027-0137-0027-0136-0010-0007-10LOTUS LAKECHRISTMAS LAKESILVER LAKELUCY LAKELAKELAKELAKELAKENYYNYYYYDATES OF CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION START DATE: 07/22ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 03/24GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INFORMATIONDESCRIBE THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WHAT WILL BE BUILT, GENERAL TIMELINE, ETC): LOT SPLIT, INSTALL PRIVATE STREETDESCRIBE SOIL TYPES FOUND AT THE PROJECT: LARGELY CLAY WITH VERY LOW HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITSITE LOCATION MAP - ATTACH MAPS (U.S. GEOLOGIC SURVEY 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS OR EQUIVALENT) SHOWING THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL RECEIVING WATERS, INCLUDINGWETLANDS, DRAINAGE DITCHES, STORMWATER PONDS, OR BASINS, ETC. THAT WILL RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT. USE ARROWS SHOWING THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND DISTANCE TO THE WATER BODY.SOILS INFORMATIONMAP UNITSYMBOLKBKILKENNY-LESTERMAP UNIT NAMEKCLESTER-KILKENNYKDLESTER-KILKENNYKD2LESTER-KILKENNYGENERAL SITE INFORMATION (III.A)1. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICIES (BMP'S). INCLUDE THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURES USED TO ESTABLISHADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY. (5.5)THE PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY TWO (W) MAIN BMP'S AND SILT FENCE. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILITZED.2. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A TABLE WITH THE ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (5.7). SEE PAGE SW1.33. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A SITE MAP THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (5.9):EXIST AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMRWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS.LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND SOIL TYPES.·EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS.·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.·LOCATION OF AREAS OF PHASED CONSTRUCTION.·ALL SURFACE WATERS AND EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE (IDENTIFIABLE ON MAPS SUCH AS USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAPS OR EQUIVALENT.WHERE SURFACE WATERS RECEIVING RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT FIT ON THE PLAN SHEET, THEY MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH AN ARROW, INDICATING BOTH DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO THE SURFACE WATER.·METHODS TO BE USED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA4. WERE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW OF THE PROJECT? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW THESE MEASURES WERE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. (5.16)N/A5. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED IN A KARST AREA SUCH THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PROJECT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN MINN. R. CHAPTERS 7050 AND 7060? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO BE USED. (SECTION 23)N/A6. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A CALCEREOUS FEN LISTED IN MINN. R. 7050.0180, SUBP. 6.B? NOIF YES, A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO APPLICATION FOR THIS PERMIT.7. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A WATER THAT IS LISTED AS IMPARED FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS, TURBIDITY, DISSOLVED OXYGEN OR BIOTIC IMPAIRMENT? USE THE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT:WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER/STORMWATER-C.HTMLYESIF NO, SKIP TO TRAININGDOES THE IMPAIRED WATER HAVE AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDL) WITH AN APPROVED WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY? YESIF YES:A. LIST THE RECEIVING WATER, THE AREAS OF THE SITE DISCHARGING TO IT, AND THE POLLUTANT(S) IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.B. LIST THE BMP'S AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.IF THE SITE HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE IMPAIRED WATER AND THE WATER FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED WATER BUT NO SPECIFIC BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL, THE ADDITIONAL BMPS IN SECTION 23 MUST BEADDED TO THE SWPPP AND IMPLEMENTED (15.19). THE ADDITIONAL BMPS ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT DRAIN TO ONE OF THE IDENTIFIED DISCHARGE POINTS.N/A8. IDENTIFY ADJACENT PUBLIC WATERS WHERE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) HAS DECLARED “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS” DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMESN/ASELECTION OF A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SECTION 15)1. WILL THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE? YESIF YES, A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE CUMULATIVE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE (SEE 16.7 OF THE PERMIT) THROUGH INFILTRATION UNLESS PROHIBITED DUE TOONE OF THE REASONS IN ITEMS 16.4 THROUGH 16.21. IF INFILTRATION IS PROHIBITED IDENTIFY OTHER METHOD OF OTHER VOLUME REDUCTION (E.G., FILTRATION SYSTEM, WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, REGIONAL PONDING OREQUIVALENT METHOD2. DESCRIBE WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED TO TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT:INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE METHOD SELECTED. SEE SECTION 23 OF THE PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH METHOD.FILTRATION BASINSCALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SITE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND PART OF THIS SWPPP AS ATTACHMENT D.3. IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME, DESCRIBE WHY. THIS CAN INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAYPRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT, SUCH AS GRASSES SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, WILL BE IMPLEMENTEDTO TREAT RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. (15.8)IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME.4. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO TROUT STREAMS, INCLUDING TRIBUTARIES TO TROUT STREAMS, IDENTIFY METHOD OF INCORPORATING TEMPERATURE CONTROLS INTO THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENTSYSTEM.N/AEROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES (SECTION 8.1)DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION BMP'S EXPECTED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCITON:1. DESCRIBE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BEDISTURBED (E.G., WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) BEFORE WORK BEGINS.SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT ATHE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE.2. DESCRIBE METHODS OF TEMPORARILY STABILIZING SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES (E.G., MULCHES, HYDRAULIC TACKIFIERS, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.):TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES.3. DESCRIBE METHODS OF DISSIPATING VELOCITY ALONG STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND AT CHANNEL OUTLETS (E.G., CHECK DAMS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, RIP RAP, ETC.):SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL.4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS (NOTE THAT MULCH, HYDRAULIC SOIL TACKIFIERS, HYDROMULCHES, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLESOIL STABILIZATION METHODS FOR ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE)FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD5. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS (E.G., RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, ETC.)RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO PROMOTE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL ON THE SITE PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE (E.G., DIRECT STORMWATER FLOW TOVEGETATED AREAS):DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED7. FOR DRAINAGE OR DIVERSION DITCHES, DESCRIBE PRACTICES TO STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TOSURFACE WATER. THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO SURFACE WATERS AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HASTEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED FOR ALL DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL, IMPAIRED OR “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS”. ALL OTHER REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTDITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER, PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.N/A, NO DITCHES ON SITE8. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION (E.G., CONSTRUCTION PHASING, MINIMIZING SOIL DISTURBANCE,VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, SLOPE DRAINING/TERRACING, ETC.):OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZING SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE.9. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN APPENDIX A PART C.3 REGARDING MAINTAINING A 100-FOOT BUFFER ZONE OR INSTALLING REDUNDANT BMPS FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITETHAT DRAIN TO SPECIAL WATERS).N/A10. IF APPLICABLE, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE TO PROTECT PLANNED FILTRATION AREASMINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO FILTRATION AREAS.SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICIES (SECTION 9.1)DESCRIBE THE METHODS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB ANDGUTTER SYSTEMS1. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL:SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE2. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SOIL STOCKPILES:SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY3. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION:N/A4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING AT CONSTRUCTION EXITS AND STREET SWEEPING ACTIVITIES:THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.5. DESCRIBE METHODS, IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHENEXCAVATED PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA:SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT INFILTRATION AREAS.6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOP SOIL (UNLESS INFEASIBLE) AT THIS SITE:LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED7. DESCRIBE PLANS TO PRESERVE A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S SOIL DISTURBANCE AND A SURFACE WATER OR PLANS FOR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS IF A BUFFERIS INFEASIBLE:DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. PROJECT WILL NOT DISTURB WITHIN 50 FEET OF WETLAND PER CITY REQUIREMENT.8. DESCRIBE PLANS FOR USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) SEE PART 9.18 OF THE PERMIT:N/A9. IS THE PROJECT REQUIRED TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DUE TO 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION OR 5 ACRES OR MORE IF THE SITE IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF ASPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER?YESIF YES, DESCRIBE (OR ATTACH PLANS ) SHOWING HOW THE BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 14.PROPOSED FILTRATION BASINS WILL SERVE AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENTS BASINS THAT WILL THEN BE CONVERTED TO PERMANENT FILTRATIONS BASINS.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10.1)1. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE MEASURES TO BE USED TO TREAT/DISPOSE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER AND METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION OR SCOUR OF DISCHARGE POINTS (SEE 10.2 THROUGH10.4 OF THE PERMIT):N/A 2. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE USE OF FILTERS FOR BACKWASH WATER? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW FILTER BACKWASH WATER WILL BE MANAGED ON THE SITE OR PROPERLY DISPOSED (10.5):N/AADDITIONAL BMP'S FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND DISCHARGES TO WETLANDS (SECTION 23.1)1. SPECIAL WATERS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL WATERS? YES2. IF PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES,THEN OTHER TREATMENT SUCH AS GRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENTWILL BE PROVIDED.N/A3. DESCRIBE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE TO A SPECIAL WATERS, AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS FOR AREAS THATDRAIN FIVE OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED4. DESCRIBE THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER ZONE TO BE USED (NOT LESS THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM THE SPECIAL WATER).LAND WILL NOT BE DISTURBED WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE SPECIAL WATER5. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL ENSURE THAT THE PRE AND POST PROJECT RUNOFF RATE AND VOLUME FROM THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOURPRECIPITATION EVENTS REMAINS THE SAME.MODELING PERFORMED IN HYDROCAD, SEE ATTACHMENT D.6. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN THE TEMPERATURE OF TROUT STREAM RECEIVING WATERS RESULTING IN THE 1, AND2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS.N/A7. WETLANDS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO A WETLAND (E.G., CONVERSION OF A NATURAL WETLAND TO ASTORMWATER POND)? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE WETLAND MITIGATION SEQUENCE THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22 OF THE PERMT.N/AINSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11.1)DESCRIBE PROCEDURES TO ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE:·ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND·WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND WITHIN (7) DAYS AFTER THATINSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS.INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST"1. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF BUILDING PRODUCTS WITH A POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO STORMWATER:ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE2. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE OF PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICAL, AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS:ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZED EXPOSURE3. DESCRIBE PRACTICES FOR STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR TOXIC WASTE (E.G., OIL, FUEL, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS,WOOD PRESERVATIVE, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) ACCORDING TO MINN. R. CH. 7045, INCLUDING RESTRICTED ACCESS AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT:ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS.4. DESCRIBE COLLECTION, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035:ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTER WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS5. DESCRIBE MANAGEMENT OF PORTABLE TOILETS TO PREVENT TIPPING AND DISPOSAL OF SANITARY WASTES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7040:SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER.6. DESCRIBE SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE FOR FUELING AND EQUIPMENT OR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE:EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS.7. DESCRIBE CONTAINMENT AND DISPOSAL OF VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASH WATER AND PROHIBITING ENGINE DEGREASING ON THE SITE:ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE8. DESCRIBE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUT WASTES SO THAT WASTES DO NOT CONTACT THE GROUND:ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE.FINAL STABILIZATION (25.22)1. DESCRIBE METHOD OF FINAL STABILIZATION (PERMANENT COVER) OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS:FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS.2. DESCRIBE METHODS USED TO CLEAN ALL STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS AND STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT (25.22):CLEANING OF STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS SHALL BE DONE BY HAND SUCH AS THE USE OF A SHOVEL.3. DESCRIBE METHODS FOR REMOVING ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S:REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S CAN BE DONE BY HAND AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF.KE2LESTER-KILKENNYKFLESTER-KILKENNY512 CUNNINGHAM 2ND ADDITION 855 PLEASANT VIEW ROAD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 350 HWY 7, SUITE 218 EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 ADOR BESPOKE HOMES PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:220855/5/2022CITY RESUBMITTAL........3/18/2022CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:MSMP..............COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c202244263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.05/05/22Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture5000 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422civilsitegroup.com 612-615-00604/19/2022WATERSHED RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.5SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS............ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORMATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMNOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL APOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT (PERMIT) ISSUED ONAUGUST 1, 2018. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMITREQUIREMENTS.FACILITY INFORMATIONSITE NAME: SITE ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER:CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE:INSPECTION INFORMATIONINSPECTOR NAME: _______________________ PHONE NUMBER: _________________________ORGANIZATION/COMPANY MAN: _____________________________________________________DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): _____________________TIME: ____________ AM / PMIS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)?IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT:RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): ____________IS SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER THAT CAN POTENTIALLY RECEIVE DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE?IF YES, FOLLOW SECTION 23 AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTSNOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME, SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION.EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (SECTION 8.1)1.ARE SOILS STABILIZED WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS OCCURRED FOR 14 DAYS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES)?(7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE, OR 24 HOURS DURING MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES [DNR] FISHSPAWNING RESTRICTIONS)2.HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED?3.IF STEEP SLOPES ARE DISTURBED, ARE STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES USED?4.ALL DITCHES/SWALES STABILIZED 200' BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE OR PROPERTY EDGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (MULCH,HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, OR SIMILAR BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES [BMPS] ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE IN DITCHES/SWALESIF THE SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 2%)ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS?5.DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION (WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION)?6.IS CONSTRUCTION PHASING BEING FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SWPPP?7.ARE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MARKED OFF (FLAGS, SIGNS, ETC.)?COMMENTS:SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 9.1)1.ARE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS INSTALLED PROPERLY ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS?2.ARE APPROPRIATE BMPS INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS, CATCH BASINS, AND CULVERT INLETS?3.IS A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER PRESERVED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS DURING CONSTRUCTION?3.1.IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED?4.DO ALL ERODIBLE STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROL IN PLACE?5.IS THERE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN ON SITE, AND IS IT BUILT AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14 OF THE PERMIT?6.IS SOIL COMPACTION BEING MINIMIZED WHERE NOT DESIGNED FOR COMPACTION?7.IS TOPSOIL BEING PRESERVED UNLESS INFEASIBLE?8.IF CHEMICAL FLOCCULANTS ARE USED, IS THERE A CHEMICAL FLOCCULANT PLAN IN PLACE?COMMENTS:DISCLOSURES:·AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND ON SITE BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FOR MORE DETAILS.·THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMPS AS WELL AS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS UNTILANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO SECTION 3, OR THE PROJECT HAS MET THE TERMINATION CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THEMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY.Y N N/AY N N/A7 DAY RAINY NMAINTENANCE AND INSPECTIONS (SECTION 11)1.ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING GROUND COVER?2.ARE PERIMETER CONTROLS MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY, SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN ONE-HALF FULL?3.ARE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTING INLETS?4.ARE THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS BEING MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?5.ARE VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS AT SITE EXISTS IN PLACE AND MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?6.IS ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT BEING REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS?7.HAVE ALL SURFACE WATERS, DITCHES, CONVEYANCES, AND DISCHARGE POINTS BEEN INSPECTED?8.WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION (I.E., SEDIMENT, TURBID WATER, OR OTHERWISE)?IF YES, RECORD THE LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (SIZE, COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, TIME, ETC.).DESCRIBE HOW THE DISCHARGE WILL BE ADDRESSED. WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BE RECOVERED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS ANDIN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM 11.5 OF THE PERMIT?COMMENTS:Y N N/APOLLUTION PREVENTION (SECTION 12)1.ARE ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER OR PROTECTED?2.ARE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BEING PROPERLY STORED?3.ARE APPROPRIATE BMPS BEING USED TO PREVENT DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH FUELING AND MAINTENANCE OFEQUIPMENT OR VEHICLES?4.ARE ALL SOLID WASTES BEING PROPERLY CONTAINED AND DISPOSED OF?5.IS THERE A CONCRETE/OTHER MATERIAL WASHOUT AREA ON SITE AND IS IT BEING USED?6.IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH A SIGN?7.ARE THE CONCRETE/OTHER MATERIAL WASHOUT AREAS PROPERLY MAINTAINED?COMMENTS:Y N N/AOTHER1.IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP, INSPECTION RECORDS, AND TRAINING DOCUMENTATION LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTIONSITE, OR CAN IT BE MADE AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS?2.HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE, AND AMENDED AS NEEDED?3.IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE?IF YES, WHAT BMPS ARE BEING USED TO ENSURE THAT CLEAN WATER IS LEAVING THE SITE AND THE DISCHARGE IS NOTCAUSING EROSION OR SCOUR?4.WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE CREATED FOR THIS PROJECT IF REQUIRED AND INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 15 OF THE PERMIT (IF ADDING AN ACRE OR MORE OF NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE)?IF YES, DESCRIBE:5.IF INFILTRATION/FILTRATION SYSTEMS ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED, ARE THEY MARKED AND PROTECTED FROMCOMPACTION AND SEDIMENTATION?6.DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OFCORRECTIVE ACTIONS:7.PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP:8.POTENTIOAL AREAS OF CUTURE CONCERN:9.ADDITIONAL COMMENTSY N N/AY N513 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN i DENOTES TAG # N EW ROPo P EPSP — 722 11 23 17 0 TOTAL ACRES = 3.36 BASELINE TREE CANOP BASELINE = 30.6% I ) REMOVAL = 0.016 ACRE SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS REMOVE TREE 6 acres to be removed NORTH r' 6 0 50 24 #727 # 7 IN FEET ) 725 1 inch = 50 ft. 27 q. rem ov 5 s1-Q 0 1.03 AC. CANOPY REMAINING = 1.0 ACRE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT = \ BCALYX I I BELOW TREE INVENTORY DESIGN GROUP DATE 02/11/22. TAG NO. TREE DIA. (IN) SPECIES CONDITION 711 24 Red Pine G ood NOTES I SB I \ J R 02 15 22 t1 t T12 32 White Oak Goad T13 19 White Oak Gaad 7,14 27 White Oak Good T15 27 Red Maple Fair T16 33 Silver Maple Fair Trunk Darns e & dead Branches T17 21 Red Maple Fair TiS 14 Colarada Blue Spruce Good 71-0 24 Red Maple Fair 720 23 Red Maple Fair 721 24 Red Maple Fair 722 21 Red Maple Fair T23 21 Box Elder Pac. Hollow Trunk & Heavy Lean T24 24 Red Pine G ood 725 13 Green Spruce Good T2C 15 Green Ash Fair T27 14 Balsam Fir Gaad 72.8 1 27 1 Box Elder Poor Trunk Carnage, Hollaw & Heavy Le 1$ 170. OF TREES TAGGED I 400 TOTAL INCHES INVENTORIED ev. / / , ags I herebycertify-the4—tbis survU, plan or report was prepared by me or l— — — — — — — — — — — under my direct supervision and that 1 — — — — — am a duly Registered Land Surveypr under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ERIC R. VICKARYOUS an f ACRE LAND SbRVEYING Serving Twin Cities Metro .. area and beyond 763-458-2997 acrelandsurve gmall.com Date:02/08/2022 Reg. No. 44125 JOB #21154 1 0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 Ill 112 113 114 115 116 117 18 19 120 Cr\Users\eric,j\neDrive\CAD-1D\21154 Cunningham Mary Meuwissen\21154new clivision.dwg 2/15/2022 1120i02 PM CST 514 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS 4ti I I I I TOTAL ACRES = 3.36 V BASELINE TREE CANOPY K) BASELINE = 30.6% I ) REMOVAL = 0.016 ACRE IANOPY REMAINING = Li i I MINIMUM REQUIREMENT = SB t.l Rev. 02/15/22, t e I tags ; I hereby certify tha Ilth.is survey, plan or report was prep d-by-r a Qr under my direct supervision and thbt— I am a duly Registered Land Surveyolr— under the laws of the State of I I Minnesota. NORTH 0 50 IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. f763- 4W-2W7 CRE LAND SURVEYING Serving Twin Cities Metro ERIC R. VICKARYOUS area and beyond Date: 02/08/2022 Reg. No. 44125 acrelandsurve.. i gmall.com JOB# 21154 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 110 Ill 112 112' 117 118 119 20 C7\ Users\eric,j\neDrive\CAD-1D\21154 Cunningham Mary Meuwissen\21154new division.dwg 2/15/2022 112DO2 PM CST 515 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA CUNNINGHAM SECOND ADDITION DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) 516 i TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1.REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL............................................................................SP-1 2.CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL........................................................................SP-1 3.DEVELOPMENT PLANS............................................................................................SP-1 4.IMPROVEMENTS........................................................................................................SP-2 5.TIME OF PERFORMANCE.........................................................................................SP-2 6.SECURITY....................................................................................................................SP-2 7.NOTICE.........................................................................................................................SP-3 8.OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS................................................................................SP-3 9.GENERAL CONDITIONS ...........................................................................................SP-5 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.RIGHT TO PROCEED.................................................................................................GC-1 2.PHASED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................GC-1 3.PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS................................................................................GC-1 4.CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS.....................................................................GC-1 5.IMPROVEMENTS.......................................................................................................GC-1 6.IRON MONUMENTS..................................................................................................GC-2 7.LICENSE......................................................................................................................GC-2 8.SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.........................................................GC-2 8A.EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING OR OTHER BUILDING.........................................................................................GC-2 9.CLEAN UP...................................................................................................................GC-3 10.ACCEPTANCE AND OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS....................................GC-3 11.CLAIMS .......................................................................................................................GC-3 12.PARK DEDICATION..................................................................................................GC-3 13.LANDSCAPING..........................................................................................................GC-3 14.WARRANTY ...............................................................................................................GC-4 15.LOT PLANS.................................................................................................................GC-4 16.EXISTING ASSESSMENTS.......................................................................................GC-4 17.HOOK-UP CHARGES.................................................................................................GC-4 18.PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING.....................................................................................GC-4 19.SIGNAGE.....................................................................................................................GC-5 20.HOUSE PADS..............................................................................................................GC-5 21.RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS................................................................................GC-5 22.DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT.........................................................................................GC-6 22.MISCELLANEOUS A.Construction Trailers ........................................................................................GC-6 B.Postal Service....................................................................................................GC-7 C.Third Parties......................................................................................................GC-7 D.Breach of Contract............................................................................................GC-7 E.Severability.......................................................................................................GC-7 517 ii F.Building Permits...............................................................................................GC-7 G.Waivers/Amendments.......................................................................................GC-7 H.Release..............................................................................................................GC-7 I.Insurance...........................................................................................................GC-7 J.Remedies...........................................................................................................GC-8 K.Assignability.....................................................................................................GC-8 L.Construction Hours...........................................................................................GC-8 M.Noise Amplification..........................................................................................GC-8 N.Access...............................................................................................................GC-8 O.Street Maintenance............................................................................................GC-8 P.Storm Sewer Maintenance................................................................................GC-9 Q.Soil Treatment Systems....................................................................................GC-9 R.Variances...........................................................................................................GC-9 S.Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations.....................................GC-9 T.Proof of Title.....................................................................................................GC-9 U.Soil Conditions................................................................................................GC-10 V.Soil Correction................................................................................................GC-10 W.Haul Routes.........................................................................................................GC-10 X.Development Signs..............................................................................................GC-10 Y.Construction Plans...............................................................................................GC-10 Z.As-Built Lot Surveys...........................................................................................GC-11 518 SP-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) CUNNINGHAM SECOND ADDITION SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated June 13, 2022 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, Michael S. Meuwissen and Mary F. Meuwissen, husband and wife (collectively referred to herein as the "Developer"). 1.Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Cunningham Second Addition(referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2.Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3.Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A:Final plat approved June 13, 2022, prepared by Acre Land Surveying. Plan B:Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated May 5, 2022, prepared by Civil Site Group. Plan C:Plans and Specifications for Improvements dated May 5, 2022, prepared by Civil Site Group. Plan D:Tree Preservation Plan dated February 15, 2022, prepared by Acre Land Surveying. 519 SP-2 4.Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Water Drainage System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading/Restoration H. Underground Utilities (e.g. gas, electric, telephone, CATV) I. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments J. Surveying and Staking K. Landscaping L. Erosion Control 5.Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements by November 15, 2022. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City Engineer. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 6.Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank acceptable to the City, or cash escrow ("security") for $92,940.49. The amount of the security was calculated as 110% of the following: Erosion Control/Restoration $ 8,500.00 Watermain/Sanitary Sewer Stubs $ 31,575.00 Storm Sewer & BMP $ 26,250.00 Streets $ 11,190.00 Sub-total, Construction Costs $ 77,515.00 Engineering, surveying, and inspection (7% of construction costs)$ 5,426.05 Landscaping (2% of construction costs)$ 1,550.30 Sub-total, Other Costs $ 6,976.35 TOTAL COST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $ 84,491.35 SECURITY AMOUNT (110% of 84,491.35)$ 92,940.49 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The security shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the 520 SP-3 security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. With City approval, the security may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid, but in no case shall the security be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount until (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required “record” plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 7.Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Mary and Michael Meuwissen 4265 County Road 123 Mayer, MN 55360 Phone: 612-670-5879 Email: riverdanceranch@protonmail.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 8.Other Special Conditions. A. FEES 1.Prior to release of the plat for recording and prior to scheduling a pre-construction meeting, Developer shall submit to the City $44,624.93 for the following City fees: *Administration fee (based on estimated construction cost of $77,515.00, 3.0% for the cost of improvements)$2,325.45 GIS fee: 2 parcels @ $30/parcel + $100 for the plat $160.00 Partial payment of City sewer and water hookup fees: 2 units @ $691/unit (sewer) + $2,562/unit (water)$6,506.00 Attorney Fee for Review and Recording of Plat and DC(paid with application)$0.00 Surface Water Management Fee $29,833.48 Total $44,624.93 521 SP-4 B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Building 1. Building plans must provide sufficient information to verify that proposed building meets all requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code; additional comments or requirements may be required after plan review. 2. A building permit must be obtained before beginning any construction. 3. Retaining walls (if present) more than four feet high must be designed by a professional engineer and a building permit must be obtained prior to construction. 4. If any soil corrections are done on the property, a final grading plan and soil report must be submitted to the Inspections Division before permits will be issued. 5. Each lot must be provided with a separate sewer and water service. Engineering 1. Upon submittal of the final plat and final construction plans the private street shall illustrate the use of traffic control devices that are consistent with the current version of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, along with meeting the criteria listed out in Sec. 18-57.n, o., and p. 2. Covenants concerning maintenance and snow plowing operations for the private street shall be filed against all benefit properties, and must be recorded concurrently or prior to the final plat. 3. All plans shall be in conformance with the most recent edition of the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates along with City Ordinances. 4. The applicant shall enter into a Development Contract with the City and pay all applicable fees and securities prior to recording of final plat. 5. The applicant and their Engineer shall work with City staff in amending the construction plans, dated May 5, 2022 prepared by Matthew R. Pavek, PE with Civil Site Group to fully satisfy staff concerns. Final construction plans will be subject to review and approval by staff prior to issuance of the Notice to Proceed for construction activities. Environmental Resources 1. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 522 SP-5 2. Developer shall notify the City for inspection of tree fencing prior to starting any grading. 3. Any trees removed that were designated for preservation on the Tree Canopy Plan dated December 8, 2021 shall be replaced on site at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches. Fire 1. The turnaround and road leading in will need to have No Parking Fire Lane signs. Parks: 1. The developer shall pay park and recreation fees of $5,800.00 prior to recording the final plat. Planning: 1. An access and maintenance agreement shall be recorded for the private street. 2. The developer shall remove the construction debris from the drainage ravine in the southeast portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Cunningham 2nd Addition. Water Resources: 1. The applicant must update the Hydrologic and Hydraulic models per City and watershed district comments and submit updated computations and models in their native forms with the final plat and final construction plans. 2. The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed project will not adversely impact downstream properties. Justification in the narrative and additional computations as needed must be provided with the final plat and final construction plans. 3. The applicant shall update P8 water quality modeling and resubmit the models in their native form to confirm the City’s water quality rule is met with the final plat and final construction plans. 4. The applicant shall enter into an Operations and Maintenance Agreement for any proposed privately owned stormwater facilities which shall be recorded concurrently with the final plat. 9.General Conditions. The general conditions of this Contract are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. 523 SP-6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and by Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 524 SP-7 DEVELOPER: Mary F. Meuwissen _____________________________________ Michael S. Meuwissen STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by Michael S. Meuwissen and Mary F. Meuwissen and, husband and wife. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 525 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: That part of Lots 2 and 3, all in Block 1, PAT CUNNINGHAM, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the following described property; Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 2; thence South 85 degrees 52 minutes 48 seconds East (assumed bearing) along the south line of said Lot 2 a distance of 221.21; thence North 17 degrees 23 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 367.98; thence North 41 degrees 42 minutes 48 seconds West 110.64 feet; thence North 89 degrees 02 minutes 11 seconds West 30.00 feet to the west line of said Lot 3; thence south 00 degrees 57 minutes 49 seconds West along said west line 418.42 feet to the point of beginning. 526 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 527 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 528 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO:City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2______, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 15, 2______. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 15 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, ChanhassenCity Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 529 GC-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the County Recorder's Officeor Registrar of Title’s Officeof the County where the plat is located, and 4) the City Engineer has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2.Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 3.Preliminary Plat Status. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within two (2) years after preliminary plat approval. 4.Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5.Improvements. The improvements specified in the Special Provisions of this Contract shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, and plans and specifications which have been prepared and signed by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and other pertinent agencies before proceeding 530 GC-2 with construction. The City will, at the Developer's expense, have one or more construction inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer shall also provide a qualified inspector to perform site inspections on a daily basis. Inspector qualifications shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its project engineer/inspector to respond to questions from the City Inspector(s) and to make periodic site visits to satisfy that the construction is being performed to an acceptable level of quality in accordance with the engineer's design. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6.Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.021. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 7. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 8.Site Erosion and SedimentControl. Before the site is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion and sediment control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosionand sediment transport. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion and sediment transport at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Erosion and sediment control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored, even if construction has been completed and accepted. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion and sediment control, the City will authorize the removal of the erosion and sediment control, i.e. hay bales and silt fence. The Developer shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. 8a.Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. 531 GC-3 9.Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 10.Acceptance and Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. After completion of the improvements, a representative of the contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection of the work with the City Engineer. Before the City accepts the improvements, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the Developer and his engineer shall submit a written statement to the City Engineer certifying that the project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The appropriate contractor waivers shall also be provided. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall be by City Council resolution. 11.Claims. In the event that the City receives claims from laborers, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment out of the financial guarantees posted with the City, and if the claims are not resolved at least ninety (90) days before the security required by this Contract will expire, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125% of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees. 12.Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay full park dedication fees in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. The park dedication fees shall be the current amount in force at the time of final platting pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinances and City Council resolutions. 13.Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with Plan D. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City’s approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2½) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). In addition to any sod required as a part of the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, the Developer or lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of six (6) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the 532 GC-4 escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. 14.Warranty. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of thecost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A.The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B.The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to two (2) years from the date of final written acceptance. C.The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following acceptance by the City. 15.Lot Plans. Prior to the issuance of buildingpermits, an acceptable Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control including silt fences, and Tree Removal Plan shall be submitted for each lot for review and approval by the City Engineer. Each plan shall assure that drainage is maintained away from buildings and that tree removal is consistent with development plans and City Ordinance. 16.Existing Assessments. Any existing assessments against the plat will be re-spread against the plat in accordance with City standards. 17.Hook-up Charges. . At the time of final plat approval the Developer shall pay 30% of the City Sewer Hook-up charge and 30% of the City Water hook up charge for each lot in the plat in the amount specified in Special Provision, Paragraph 8, of this Development Contract. The balance of the hook-up charges is collected at the time building permits are issued are based on 70% of the rates then in effect, unless a written request is made to assess the costs over a four year term at the rates in effect at time of application. 18.Public Street Lighting. The Developer shall have installed and pay for public street lights in accordance with City standards. The public street lights shall be accepted for City ownership and maintenance at the same time that the public street is accepted for ownership and maintenance. A plan shall be submitted for the City Engineer's approval prior to the installation. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $300.00 for each street light installed in 533 GC-5 the plat. The fee shall be used by the City for furnishing electricity and maintaining each public street light for twenty (20) months. 19.Signage. All street signs,traffic signs, and wetland monumentation required by the City as a part of the plat shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer. 20.House Pads. The Developer shall promptly furnish the City "as-built" plans indicating the amount, type and limits of fill on any house pad location. 21.Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall pay an administrative fee in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. This fee is to cover the cost of City Staff time and overhead for items such as review of construction documents, preparation of the Development Contract, monitoring construction progress, processing pay requests, processing security reductions, and final acceptance of improvements. This fee does not cover the City's cost for construction inspections. The fee shall be calculated as follows: i) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is less than $500,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs; ii)if the cost of the construction of public improvements is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs for the first $500,000 and two percent (2%) of construction costs over $500,000; iii)if the cost of the construction of public improvements is over $1,000,000, two and one-half percent (2½%) of construction costs for the first $1,000,000 and one and one-half percent (1½%) of construction costs over $1,000,000. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall deposit with the City a fee based upon construction estimates. After construction is completed, the final fee shall be determined based upon actual construction costs. The cost of public improvements is defined in paragraph 6 of the Special Provisions. B. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City for providing construction and erosion and sediment control inspections. This cost will be periodically billed directly to the Developer based on the actual progress of the construction. Payment shall be due in accordance with Article 21E of this Agreement. C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. 534 GC-6 D. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. G. Private Utilities. The Developer shall have installed and pay for the installation of electrical, natural gas, telephone, and cable television service in conjunction with the overall development improvements. These services shall be provided in accordance with each of the respective franchise agreements held with the City. H.The developer shall pay the City a fee established by City Council resolution, to reimburse the City for the cost of updating the City’s base maps, GIS data base files, and converting the plat and record drawings into an electronic format. Record drawings must be submitted within four months of final acceptance of public utilities. All digital information submitted to the City shall be in the Carver County Coordinate system. 22.Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 23.Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the pre-construction meeting for installation of public improvements. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the acceptance of the public improvements unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer’s obligations under this Contract. The City 535 GC-7 shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City’s failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. The City may also issue a stop work order halting all plat development until the breach has been cured and the City has received satisfactory assurance that the breach will not reoccur. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Building Permits. Building permits will not be issued in the plat until sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer have been installed, tested, and accepted by the City, and the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site graded and revegetated in accordance with Plan B of the development plans. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property . After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. I. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $500,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. J.Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time 536 GC-8 to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. L. Construction Hours. Construction hours, including pick-up and deliveries of material and equipment and the operation of any internal combustion engine, may only occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no such activity allowed on Sundays or on legal holidays. Contractors must require their subcontractors, agents and supplies to comply with these requirements and the Contractor is responsible for their failure to do so. Under emergency conditions, this limitation may be waived by the written consent of the City Engineer. If construction occurs outside of the permitted construction hours, the Contractor shall pay the following administrative penalties: First violation $ 500.00 Second violation $1,000.00 Third & subsequent violations All site development and construction must cease for seven (7) calendar days M. Noise Amplification. The use of outdoor loudspeakers, bullhorns, intercoms, and similar devices is prohibited in conjunction with the construction of homes, buildings, and the improvements required under this contract. The administrative penalty for violation of construction hours shall also apply to violation of the provisions in this paragraph. N. Access. All access to the plat prior to the City accepting the roadway improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer regardless if the City has issued building permits or occupancy permits for lots within the plat. O. Street Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until streets within the plat are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed by the Developer when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If streets become impassable, theCity may order that such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth roadway surface and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City plow snow on the streets prior to final acceptance of the streets. The City shall have complete discretion to approve or reject the request. The City shall not be responsible for reshaping or damage to the street base or utilities because of snow plowing operations. The provision of City snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. P. Storm Sewer Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system (including ponds, pipes, catch basins, culverts and swales) within the plat and the adjacent off-site storm sewer system that receives storm water from the plat. The Developer shall follow all instructions it receives from the City concerning the cleaning and 537 GC-9 maintenance of the storm sewer system. The Developer's obligations under this paragraph shall end two (2) years after the public street and storm drainage improvements in the plat have been accepted by the City. Twenty percent (20%) of the storm sewer costs, shown under section 6 of the special provisions of this contract, will be held by the City for the duration of the 2-year maintenance period. Q. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the platting process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. R. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District(s); 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. T. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. U. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. V. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi-lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. 538 GC-10 W. Haul Routes. The Developer, the Developer’s contractors or subcontractors must submit proposed haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose. All haul routes must be approved by the City Engineer X. Development Signs. The Developer shall post a six foot by eight foot development sign in accordance with City Detail Plate No. 5313 at each entrance to the project. The sign shall be in place before construction of the required improvements commences and shall be removed when the required improvements are completed, except for the final lift of asphalt on streets. The signs shall contain the following information: project name, name of developer, developer’s telephone number and designated contact person, allowed construction hours. Y. Construction Plans. Upon final plat approval, the developer shall provide the City with two complete sets of full-size construction plans and four sets of 11”x17” reduced construction plan sets and three sets of specifications. Within four months after the completion of the utility improvements and base course pavement and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with the following: (1) a complete set of reproducible Mylar as-built plans, (2) twocomplete full-size setsof blue line/paper as-built plans, (3) two complete sets of utility tie sheets, (4) location of buried fabric used for soil stabilization, (5) location stationing and swing ties of all utility stubs including draintile cleanouts, (6) bench mark network, (7) digital file of as-built plans in both .dxf & .tif format (the .dxf file must be tied to the current county coordinate system), (8) digital file of utility tie sheets in either .doc or .tif format, and (9) a breakdown of lineal footage of all utilities installed, including the per lineal foot bid price. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. Z. As-Built Lot Surveys. An as-built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as-built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as-built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as-built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as-built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Rev. 9/30/2021 539 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Maple Leaf Award for Dr. Dennis Peterson, Superintendent, Minnetonka Public Schools File No.Item No: J.1 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION The City of Chanhassen Maple Leaf Award was presented to Dr. Dennis Peterson for his 21 years of service as Superintendent of Minnetonka Public Schools by Mayor Elise Ryan on June 8. Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND Chanhassen expresses its gratitude to Dr. Peterson for his decades of public service including 21 years as Superintendent of Minnetonka Public Schools. Full news release here: https://www.minnetonkaschools.org/news-details/~board/feature-news-stories/post/dr-dennis-peterson- to-retire-after-21-years-as-minnetonka-schools-superintendent Minnetonka Public Schools serve a portion of Chanhassen. Congratulations Dr. Peterson on his retirement! DISCUSSION 540 BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 541 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item 2022 Building Permit Activity - May Year-to-Date File No.Item No: J.2 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By Jean Steckling, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Correspondence Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 2022 Building Permit Activity - May Year-to-Date 542 2022 Building Permit Activity May YTI)City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1100 Residential Single-Family t5 ,7 22 Residential Tounhomes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Residential 15 '7 Neq'0 I Redeveloped 0 0 0 Remodeled l5 6 2t l6 27Tolal Commercial 7',1 '70Single-Family Lots 53Residenrial Tountrome Lots 53 Total .{r'ailable Lots 130 Available Lot Inveutory of Quarter) (end 22Single-Family 55 19 68 98 Tourhomes 12 56 l8 0 0 0 il0 0Apartments,/S enior Facilities 0 268 0 Commercial 67 58 62 66 22 44Total Number of All P€rmits t34 431 120 282 2019 202020172018 2022 g:\adminforrns\buildiq permit activity 2022 ytd.doc Residential Building Permits l"t Quarter 2od Querter 3'd Quarter 4ih Quarter Total YTD Apartments/Senior Facilities 22 Commercial Building Permits I't Quarter 2nd Quarter 3d Quarter 4'b Quarter Total YTD I 6 1"! Quarter 2'd Quarter 3d Qurrter 4th Quarter t23 Total Permit Historv 2021 40 0 134 543 9 a I != := : 3 1 i 1 :! .1 a I = : .J = :a < ! 1 E t e 2 1 E + E a I E = 6 =z tr ++++l i 7 aE-- i t:aza=a aa a E!544 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Letter from Mediacom File No.Item No: J.3 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By Jean Steckling, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Correspondence Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Letter from Mediacom Regarding Extension of Cable Franchise 545 lovrtspondsrgo Medi acom Theresa Sunde Senior Manager, Government Relations May \6,2022 Ms. Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager city of Chanhassen, MN 77@ Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Request for Five (5) year extension ("Extension") of the Cable Franchise ("Franchise") between the City of Chanhassen ("City") and Mediacom Minnesota LLC {"Mediacom") in accordance with the Franchise Dear Ms. Hokkanen As you know, Section 2.4 of the Franchise between Mediacom and the City allows the parties to agree on a tive- year extension ofthe lnitialTerm ofthe Franchise. Section 2.4 readsasfollows: 'The initial term of this Franchise shall be for the period of ten (10) years from the date of acceptance by Grantee, unless renewed, revoked or, terminated sooner as herein provided ("lnitia I Term"). Upon mutual agreement by City and Grantee, the lnitial Term may be extended for an additional five (5) years. Grantee shall provide written notice to the City at least eighteen (18) months prior to the end of the lnitial Term requesting such five (5) year extension. City shall respond within ninety (90) days of such written notice from Grantee by either granting the five (5) year extension or stating in writing any objection the City may have to the five (5) year extension." As the lnitial Term commenced on December 23, 2013, which was the date of acceptance by Mediacom, this letter serves as the written notice to the City requesting the Extension in accordance with Section 2.4 of the Franchise. Thank you for your consideration and please let me know if you have any comments or questions or if I can provide any further information. Sincerely, Theresa Sunde Senior Manager of Government Relations Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk William Jensen Zachary Raskovich Med ia co m Communications Corporation 15O4 2"d Street 5E, PO Box ll0, Waseca, Minnesota 56093 GD..-;>^J-- cc: 546 City Council Item June 13, 2022 Item Letter from the Metropolitan Council File No.Item No: J.4 Agenda Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Prepared By Jean Steckling, Sr. Admin Support Specialist Reviewed By SUGGESTED ACTION Correspondence Motion Type N/A Strategic Priority N/A SUMMARY BACKGROUND DISCUSSION BUDGET RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Letter from Metropolitan Council regarding Annual Population Estimate 547 f ovra Spo ful'UtCo May 26.2022 Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 553'17 Dear Ms Ho kkanen The Metropolitan Councll has prepared preliminary population and household estimates f or your community asof April 'l,2019.This isanannual process govemed by Minnesota Statutes 473.24. As of April 1,2021, the City of Chanhassen had t0,072 housing units, 9,680 households, and 25,936 people (of whom 110 lived in group quarteE hcilities). l'lousehold size averaged 2.668 persons per household. How w6 this 66mate calculabd? We estimate households and population with a housing stock{ased method, which involves three q uestions: 1. Ha many housing units did each community have? 2. How many househdds @cupied these housing units? 3. How many Wode lived in these @cupied housing units? This letter includes an overview of ourestimation method along with a repo( showing the data inputs and calculations used to develop the prelimlnary estimates for your community. For more information, visit -::a-. "\ ,!!v i'.etrccoJnc orE oo ouiat cnesl nrates, or contact me at 651602-1513. How can local govemments provide feedback on this 6timate? We welcome discussion of the preliminary estimates and invite you to review and comment on them. We are particularly interested an feedback on the housing type estimates and the group quarters facilities, since this data has been refreshed following the 2020 Census and has not yet been reviewed by local govemments. Please send any comments orquestions to Lla:l S:nr::::'e-=i: stal: -. -s (prefened)orto Matt Schroeder, Community Development Research, 390 Robert St N, Saint Paul, MN 55101 . Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24. we must receive your comments or specific obiections, in wtiting, by June 24, 2022. What happens after local governments provide fuedback? The Council will certify final estimates by July 15, 2022 for state govemment use in allocating certain funds. Sincerely, ryr+br! *t-aaa-- Matt Schroeder Principal Researcher METROPOLITANCOUNCIL 390 Bobert Street North I Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P 651.602.1000 I TTY.651.291.0904 | metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportaty Empbyet 548 Chanhassen city, Carver County 2Q21 Annual Population Estimate Published May 26,2022 (preliminary; distributed for local government review) units Occupancy rate Households Persons per Population in household households 2.6680 Housing Popula6on in group quarters METROPOLITANCOUNCIL Tota I population 110 Housing stock April 1, 2021 2021 Estamate 2020 Census .25yo 2.6791 110 The MetroDolitan Councll estmates population using Uie housing unit method. wnrch answers three maln ouestrons for each luflsdlctron as of Apnl 1. 2021 First how many housing units did the community have? o We start with housing units measured bythe 2020 Census We broke down the total numberof housrng unrts rn the 2020 Census into different housing types using county parcel data and other data sources o We then add unfs built between April 1, 2020 and Apr l 2A/ based on permrts reported to us by communrtles Permrt data is available on our website o We assume that 85% of single-family detached units and 80o,! of townhomei duplex/triplexrquadplex units permrttec !n . 2020 were completed and occupiable by April '1 2021 o N,lultifamily units permitted in and before 2020 are assumec to be completed if they recerved a cedrllcale of occupancy by Ap'll 1 2021 o l\,ranufactured home data comes from our annual surveys of manufactursd home park operators and local governments o Data on other housing (boats RVs. etc used as housinglcomes from the mosl recent American Community Survey data: this housing is included in the estimates only if occupied . l&e also examine other housing stock changes reported by junsdictrons These include demclitions burldrng conversions iunits added or lost), boundary changes (units annexed in or oLrtl and other changes reported by crty and townshrp staff S i ng I e-f am i ly de tac h e d Housing stock April 1, 2020 8,333 Permitted and built since 2020 Other changes since 2020 54 T ow n h o m e ( Si n gl*f a m i ly altac h e d)394 0 0 96.11% D u p I e x /tr i p lex/ q u aclp I ex 21 0 0 Multifamily (5 or more units)'t,272 0 0 0Accessory dvrelling units (ADUs)0 0 Manufactured homes 0 0Other units Total 10,020 2s,936 10.020 9,6/t4 25.837 25.947 549 Second, how many of these housing units were occupied by households? . Each housing type has an estimated occupancy rate. These data come Fom the most recent American Community Survey estimales for housing units and households, decennialcensus data ftom the U.S. Census Bureau. and the U.S. Postal SeMce. To estimate multifamily occupancy rates, we also use &Star, a proprietary dala source covering the apartment market . Multiplying the number of housing units of each type by the occupancy rate yields the number of households (occupied housing units). Third. how many people lived in these occupied housing units? . Each housing type has an estimated average household size. These data come from the most recent Amencan Community Survey estimates of households and popuhtbn h hous€holds as well as decennial census data from the U.S. Census Bureau. . Multiplying the number of households in each housing type by the average household size yields the population in households. Housing stock Ap 1,2021 Population in households Occupancy rate Households (Occupied housing units) Persons per household Population in households 2 4152 2.8152 Single-family detached Townhome (Singl*family atiached) D u p le x,/tri p le x/ q u adp I e x Multifamily (5 ot morc units) 2.3808 1.61 19 1.61't9Accessory dwelling uni,s (ADU')0 Manufactured homes 0.0000 Other units 2.0856 Total 96.110/o 2.6680 To obtain the total population, we also add the number of residents in group quarters facilities. These ar3 residences that are notparlofthe standard housing market. such as college dormrtofles nursrng homes pnsons and larls. ano group homes. Data come from the Metropoltan Council's annual survey. A list of facrtrtres rn eacn communrty can be found at https:/Aivu,w.metrocouncil,org/populationestimales. Population in group quarters Total population Aptil 1, 2021 110 Due to rounding. not all estimates can be reproduced exactly from the above inputs. For more information. see our methodology documenl. available from htE)s:/ iywv.metrocouncil.org/populationestimates. 96 570/o 92.63yo 98.35% 8 u.240/o .2 99.2 21 't,272 0 0 0 10,072 8,097 387 43 1,899 0 0 0 25,826 25,826 25,936 550 Chanhassen city, Hennepin County 2021 Annual Population Estimate Published May 26, 2022 (preliminary; distributed for local government review) Housing Occupancy units rate Households Persons per Population in household households 0 Population in group quarters METROPOLITAN Tota I population Housing stock April 1, 202'l LCOUNC 2021 Estimate 2A20 Census 0.00%0 The Metropolitan Counol estimates population using the housrng unrt method. whrch answers three maln questrons for each ;ur:sd.cflon as of Apnl 1. 2021 First, how many housing units did the community have? . We start with housing units measured by the 2020 Census We broke down the total number of houslng unrts rn the 2020 Census into different housing types using county parcel data and other data sources o We then add units built belveen April 'l . 2020 and Apfll I 2021 based on permts reported to us oy corirmunitres Pern'rit data is available on our website. o We assume that 8570 of single-family detached unrts and 80o'. of townhomelduplex,/triplex/quadplex un ts permitted in 2020 we.e completed and occupiable by Aptil 1 2021 o Multifamily units permitted in and before 2020 are assum3C lo be completed if they received a ceftrflcate lf occupancy by Aptil1.2021 o Manufactured home data comes from our annual sunveys oi nanufactur-.d home park operators ano lcca govemments o Data on other housing (boats. RVs. etc used as housing) comes from the most recent Ameican Community Survey data. this housing is included in the estimates only if occupied . i&e also examine other housing stock changes reported by jurisdictions These include demolitions buiidrng conversions (units added or lost). boundary changes (units annexed in or out) and other changes reported by crf/ and towns.ip staff Housing stock April 1, 2020 Permitted and built since 2020 Other changes since 2020 S i ng I e-f a m i ly cleta c h e d 0.00% Tow n h on e (S ing le-tamily attac hed)0 0 D u p I e x/tri p le x/q u a d p I ex 0 0 Multifamily (5 or more units)0 0 Accessory dvtelling units (ADUs)0 0 Manufactured homes 0 Other units 0 Total 0 0 0 00 0 0 551 Second, how many of these housing units were occupied by households? . Each housing type has an estimated occupancy rate These data come from the most recent American Community Survey estimates for housing units and households, decennial census data from the U S Census Bureau, and the U.S. Postal Service To eslimate multifamily occupancy rales, we also use Costar. a proprietary data source covering the apartment markel. . Multiplying the number of housing units of each type by the occupancy rate yields the number of households (occupied housing units) Third. how many people lived in these occupied housing units? . Each housing type has an estimated average household size These data come from the most recent American Community Survey estimates of households and population in households as well as decenoral census data lrom the U.S Census Bureau. . lilultiplying the number of households in each housing type by the average housenold srze yreids the populatron rn households. Housing stock April 1,2021 Occupancy rate Households (Occupied housing units) Persons per household Population in households S i n g I e-f a m i I y detac h e d Tow n h o m e (S in g le-f a m i I y attached) D u p I e x/tri p le x/q u a @ I e x Multifamily (5 ot more units) Accessory dwelling units (ADU9) Manufactured homes -0.39% -0.39% 0 0 0 0 -1 .39%0 -'t.39Yo -0.39% 94.61Yo 99.6't% 0.00% 0 0 Olher units Total 0 To obtain the total population, we also add the number of residents in group quarters facilities. These are residences that are not pad of the standard housing market such as coilege dormrtofles nursrng homes prisons and larts, and group homes. Data come from the Metropolitan Councri s annual survey. A list of iacrltres ln each communrty can De iound at https:/,wl/{v.metrocouncil.org/populationestimates. Population Populationin in households group quarters Total population Aptil 1, 2021 0 Due to rounding. not all estimates can be reproduced exactly from the above inputs For more information, see our methodology document. available frcm hths:/Av\,r,w.metrocouncil.org/populalionestirnates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 552 z=IoF:(9 3 Ei";E +: U:'eEg IEEEt EE;!E-*EEgETSE:-1eusE€pgiic]-ql'o6l^co e E 6=-..= -, o-- c')Yj lE.EEEFE^ f -E=(!v rr a=F L(lto-.€6:oPeTESHES*9"€Es,E€EPe a3€3EE 9a; Etq;EJEEiHneqH--p i E h o =9;9.eEglEaP"3c5t!t o (9z,aq196a-F-g= fr=UJOJJq,oo or: .,;o)o i;.ESad(/'F -= = >,o !lo9EorGtrO.E 6)i2qotso([>5 0)3 ;r, = l=vEfoa<t-E EEu\a9E q-a F! -c, o) 0, __E€rf s E#O.!(,tr!2co:s$tilI*F;5Fie?E €EsrElt?I X - e,f, C- o E 3',-fr!39 g -o=roZaa f;EE;,9=q3 fi !s!s$$F q) l!aa =(E!:ol(!o)>cc)(/,(n 30,rC Y,8-8; b3- oo!ooz U'>ctz.J<o =- =HO=-O -co E H",.(E-! 'fr#E e:aea EeEE .E 4 o+- i-b oE; -o7=i*O-c-eBifEE'lo co -c ;i r;*xr4oBb:gP:Ei=[Eior-adEE'6-E EEEE ga: srta= E'E *Etq"eE + c-r!> -Fts=z,= ==,v =,tg 3r, >=<-, =(9-2,6a-o x x IJ,J(LoUJGz,= =o J- ,,ott,oittoo\tr,oit, o lr,o o Eo G 5 a-oa.o G too o €g6o aa GEo at, a!a*oo t, Utc tt,Ios t4 oc:oo G oa.o o =ost- taN=oE^EgEEodo-c --f-iE *5$83ie CoSo tvlt U.i >q) uo a>c d6tE sq, .JU)'()5q O -qj !(,Oao9'ED\.Eo'oN d-r Ct c6N 3-coo .9EEo'6 Eo>+oscg6=Eo ot\tRsct.-s (, .0 3doE.la6: oI HE+=F=>(9o- z,Eqrg u)tot(r!l =l t4l ot ol (BI =lolol -oldt,\l ot.-t ol ololol EI =l3l \lt(,loolo- rl QsroE0)oa/, tQor 6sOGc>!G cO,>oooSBoooS691tr EE =(!tE o(aoo \q)ds\61 EE (4 ='ESo.ol.sEsEooEE O\-soFU_ 553