Loading...
Agenda & Packet (2)AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JUNE 28, 2021 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD Due to the COVID­19 pandemic, some or all members of the City Council will participate in meetings by telephone and/or web conference pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.021,rather than in person at the city council’s regular meeting place at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, Minnesota. The Public Hearings portion of the City Council agenda allows for the public to provide comments on those agenda items. To help ensure an open public process, we have made accommodations for the public to continue to view and participate in public hearings by selecting one of following options: City Council Meetings EMAIL your comments to the City Council at publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us All comments received by 6:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included as a part of the city council meeting. WATCH the meeting live online at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/agendas or on Mediacom Cable Channel 107.2. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm. ZOOM Register to participate in the meeting via zoom. Further instructions for participation are included in the registration confirmation email. Please register by 5:00 p.m. if you wish to provide public comment on an agenda item. ATTEND the meeting in person and present your comments when called upon. Social distancing practices will be observed during the meeting. Seating will be limited for this option. If you wish to make a public comment under the Visitor Presentations portion of the City Council agenda, please review the Guidelines for Visitor Presentations and complete and submit the online form. NOTE: For all options, you must provide your name and address for the record. A.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Note:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Discuss Concept of Park and Recreation Referendum 2.2022 Preliminary Budget Financial Plan Discussion 3.Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, JUNE 28, 2021CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDDue to the COVID­19 pandemic, some or all members of the City Council will participate in meetings bytelephone and/or web conference pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.021,rather than in personat the city council’s regular meeting place at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen,Minnesota.The Public Hearings portion of the City Council agenda allows for the public to provide comments onthose agenda items. To help ensure an open public process, we have made accommodations for thepublic to continue to view and participate in public hearings by selecting one of following options:City Council MeetingsEMAIL your comments to the City Council at publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Allcomments received by 6:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included as a part of the citycouncil meeting.WATCH the meeting live online at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/agendas or on Mediacom CableChannel 107.2. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm.ZOOM Register to participate in the meeting via zoom. Further instructions for participation areincluded in the registration confirmation email. Please register by 5:00 p.m. if you wish to providepublic comment on an agenda item.ATTEND the meeting in person and present your comments when called upon. Social distancingpractices will be observed during the meeting. Seating will be limited for this option.If you wish to make a public comment under the Visitor Presentations portion of the City Councilagenda, please review the Guidelines for Visitor Presentations and complete and submit the online form.NOTE: For all options, you must provide your name and address for the record.A.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSIONNote:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Discuss Concept of Park and Recreation Referendum2.2022 Preliminary Budget Financial Plan Discussion3.Future Work Session Schedule B.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS 1.Invitation to 4th of July Celebration D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated June 14, 2021 2.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated June 1, 2021 3.Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated May 21, 2021 4.Receive Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes dated May 12, 2021 5.Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated May 11, 2021 6.Approve Claims Paid 06­28­2021 7.Approve Consultant Contract Amendment for the Minnewashta Parkway Improvement Project 8.Resolution 2021­XX: Approve Cooperative Agreement for the Minnesota Statewide All­Hazards Incident Management Organization 9.Resolution 2021­XX: Approve Cooperative Agreement with Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for Rice Marsh Lake Water Quality Improvement Project 10.Resolution 2021­XX: Establish No Parking Zone for Picha Drive 11.Appointment of Ryan Soller to the Economic Development Commission 12.Resolution 2021­XX: Accept a Memorial Donation from the Family of Senior Center Patron, Martha Walker 13.Approve Lease Agreement Amendment No. 1 with Verizon Wireless for Water Tower No. 2 14.Resolution 2021­XX: Accept the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Established under he American Rescue Plan Act E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) 1.Joseph Perttu Citizen Action Request F.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 1.Fire Department Update 2.Law Enforcement Update G.OLD BUSINESS H.PUBLIC HEARINGS I.NEW BUSINESS 1.Presentation and Approval of the 2020 Audit AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, JUNE 28, 2021CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDDue to the COVID­19 pandemic, some or all members of the City Council will participate in meetings bytelephone and/or web conference pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.021,rather than in personat the city council’s regular meeting place at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen,Minnesota.The Public Hearings portion of the City Council agenda allows for the public to provide comments onthose agenda items. To help ensure an open public process, we have made accommodations for thepublic to continue to view and participate in public hearings by selecting one of following options:City Council MeetingsEMAIL your comments to the City Council at publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Allcomments received by 6:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included as a part of the citycouncil meeting.WATCH the meeting live online at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/agendas or on Mediacom CableChannel 107.2. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm.ZOOM Register to participate in the meeting via zoom. Further instructions for participation areincluded in the registration confirmation email. Please register by 5:00 p.m. if you wish to providepublic comment on an agenda item.ATTEND the meeting in person and present your comments when called upon. Social distancingpractices will be observed during the meeting. Seating will be limited for this option.If you wish to make a public comment under the Visitor Presentations portion of the City Councilagenda, please review the Guidelines for Visitor Presentations and complete and submit the online form.NOTE: For all options, you must provide your name and address for the record.A.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSIONNote:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Discuss Concept of Park and Recreation Referendum2.2022 Preliminary Budget Financial Plan Discussion3.Future Work Session ScheduleB.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Invitation to 4th of July CelebrationD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated June 14, 20212.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated June 1, 20213.Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated May 21, 20214.Receive Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes dated May 12, 20215.Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated May 11, 20216.Approve Claims Paid 06­28­20217.Approve Consultant Contract Amendment for the Minnewashta ParkwayImprovement Project8.Resolution 2021­XX: Approve Cooperative Agreement for the Minnesota StatewideAll­Hazards Incident Management Organization9.Resolution 2021­XX: Approve Cooperative Agreement with Riley Purgatory BluffCreek Watershed District for Rice Marsh Lake Water Quality Improvement Project10.Resolution 2021­XX: Establish No Parking Zone for Picha Drive11.Appointment of Ryan Soller to the Economic Development Commission12.Resolution 2021­XX: Accept a Memorial Donation from the Family of Senior CenterPatron, Martha Walker13.Approve Lease Agreement Amendment No. 1 with Verizon Wireless for Water TowerNo. 214.Resolution 2021­XX: Accept the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Establishedunder he American Rescue Plan ActE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)1.Joseph Perttu Citizen Action RequestF.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE1.Fire Department Update2.Law Enforcement UpdateG.OLD BUSINESSH.PUBLIC HEARINGSI.NEW BUSINESS 1.Presentation and Approval of the 2020 Audit 2.Approve a Request for a Two­Foot Height Variance for an Accessory Structure on Property Located at 6300 Hummingbird Road J.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS K.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS L.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION M.ADJOURNMENT N.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue.  Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Houlihan's, 530 Pond Promenade in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Discuss Concept of Park and Recreation Referendum Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director File No:  DISCUSSION The City and its citizens have always held our park and trail system in high regard.  Community survey results continue to rate park and recreation services and amenities high; our residents find them essential, which adds to an increased quality of life.   Park and trail system improvements have been discussed recently, and the City has taken steps to listen to our residents and plan for future generations.  The City developed and produced two important planning tools: The Park and Recreation System Plan in 2017, and The Lake Ann Park Preserve Feasibility Study in 2019.  These documents provide background and guidance moving forward to the next development phases of our park system.  With the acquisition of the Lake Ann Park Preserve property, staff has heard from many residents inquiring about the project scope and timeline, so there is interest in this project's completion. In order to complete larger­scale projects, identifying funding sources is needed.  The City of Chanhassen has paid for park and trail improvements through a variety of ways, but mainly has selected referendums to cover the cost of more impactful improvements.  Historically, the City has held five referendums, with the first being November 4, 1969.  This first referendum passed, and the land that became Lake Ann Park was purchased from the Welter Family for $250,000.  The last park referendum of $4.9 million was passed 24 years ago, on June 14, 1997.  The 1997 referendum included improvements to neighborhood parks, community parks, preserve open space, and also constructed and expanded our city's trail system.  The City's 2021­2024 Strategic Plan identifies "creating new innovative places and spaces" as a desired outcome. Parks may be a place where this goal can be accomplished.  Staff looks forward to discussing the concept of a Parks Referendum to further enhance our city's park and trail system. RECOMMENDATION No action required. Staff is interested in discussion and possible direction from City Council on whether to continue pursuing the concept of a Park and Recreation Referendum. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 28, 2021SubjectDiscuss Concept of Park and Recreation ReferendumSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1.Prepared By Jerry Ruegemer, Park and RecreationDirector File No: DISCUSSIONThe City and its citizens have always held our park and trail system in high regard.  Community survey results continueto rate park and recreation services and amenities high; our residents find them essential, which adds to an increasedquality of life.  Park and trail system improvements have been discussed recently, and the City has taken steps to listen to ourresidents and plan for future generations.  The City developed and produced two important planning tools: The Parkand Recreation System Plan in 2017, and The Lake Ann Park Preserve Feasibility Study in 2019.  These documentsprovide background and guidance moving forward to the next development phases of our park system.  With theacquisition of the Lake Ann Park Preserve property, staff has heard from many residents inquiring about the projectscope and timeline, so there is interest in this project's completion.In order to complete larger­scale projects, identifying funding sources is needed.  The City of Chanhassen has paid forpark and trail improvements through a variety of ways, but mainly has selected referendums to cover the cost of moreimpactful improvements.  Historically, the City has held five referendums, with the first being November 4, 1969.  Thisfirst referendum passed, and the land that became Lake Ann Park was purchased from the Welter Family for$250,000.  The last park referendum of $4.9 million was passed 24 years ago, on June 14, 1997.  The 1997referendum included improvements to neighborhood parks, community parks, preserve open space, and alsoconstructed and expanded our city's trail system. The City's 2021­2024 Strategic Plan identifies "creating new innovative places and spaces" as a desired outcome.Parks may be a place where this goal can be accomplished. Staff looks forward to discussing the concept of a Parks Referendum to further enhance our city's park and trailsystem.RECOMMENDATION No action required. Staff is interested in discussion and possible direction from City Council on whether to continue pursuing the concept of a Park and Recreation Referendum. ATTACHMENTS: Lake Ann Park Preserve Feasibility Study Parks & Recreation System Plan LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY NOVEMBER 25, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL Mayor Elise Ryan Council Member Dan Campion Council Member Julia Coleman Council Member Jerry McDonald Council Member Bethany Tjornhom CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION Jim Boettcher, Chair Meredith Petouvis, Vice Chair Matt Kutz Haley Pemrick Joseph Scanlon Sandy Sweetser Karl Tsuchiya CHANHASSEN CITY STAFF Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director Adam Beers, Park Superintendent Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director Todd Gerhardt, City Manager INTRODUCTION 1-1 Study Purpose 1-1 Project Background 1-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-1 Site Analysis 2-1 Natural Resource Analysis 2-4 CONCEPT PLAN 3-1 Concept Plan 3-1 IMPLEMENTATION 4-1 Cost Estimate 4-1 Permitting 4-3 Project Phasing 4-4 Construction Access and Staging 4-4 Funding Sources 4-5 LAKE ANN FEASIBILITY STUDY II STUDY PURPOSE This study addresses feasibility and pricing for the creation of a trail network at the newly acquired City property known as the Lake Ann Park Preserve. The study’s purpose is to understand the design limitations of the site, develop a conceptual development plan, and estimate the overall project cost. The design has been vetted through public outreach, staff input, and Park and Recreation Commission and City Council review. The design will be further refined as construction documents are developed. The design shown in this document is used to develop cost estimates and changes may impact the final cost of development of the park preserve. Pricing reflects planning level estimates that take into account site conditions as they are understood today. Final costs may vary based on future labor and material costs, inflation, and unforeseen circumstances that may be discovered as part of the next phase of design and engineering. PROJECT BACKGROUND LOCATION Chanhassen is a city of approximately 26,000 people in the southwest part of the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area. The city is often listed among the best places to live nationally, in part based on the strength of the outdoor recreation offerings of parks, trails, and lakes. Lake Ann Park Preserve Lake Ann Lake Lucy Arboretum Blvd / 5Galpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdPowers BlvdLake Ann Park Greenwood Shores Park 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 1-1 NOVEMBER 2019 LOCAL CONTEXT LAKE ANN AND LAKE LUCY Lake Lucy sits at the northern portion of the parkland. The lake is 87.5 acres and reaches a depth of 20 feet. The Lake Lucy watershed is 994 acres and encompasses many of the neighborhoods to the northwest, as well as some wetland and park space. The wetland portion of Lake Ann Park Preserve drains into Lake Lucy. Lake Lucy then drains into Lake Ann on the south side of the site. Lake Ann gets up to 45 feet deep with a surface area of 115.7 acres. The Lake Ann watershed is much smaller at 252 acres, which is nearly a 1 to 1 ratio of lake surface and land surface area. The watershed is made up of parkland and undeveloped private land. This results in very little negative impact to the water flowing overland into Lake Ann. ADJACENT GREEN SPACE Lake Ann Park sits on the south shore of Lake Ann, between the lake and Highway 5. The park has ballfields to the south, playgrounds, a beach, and picnic shelters near the water, and wooded trails on the west. The park is a popular community park in Chanhassen. It is actively programmed and hosts many visitors and events. The parkland also encompasses a trail corridor along the eastern edge of the lake. The corridor width varies, but is is typically approximately 75’ wide. Greenwood Shores Park is a public park on the northeast corner of Lake Ann. There is a swimming beach and a picnic shelter. While the land to the southwest of Lake Ann is not public, it is worth noting that the property has not been intensely developed and helps Lake Ann retain its natural, undeveloped character. NEW NEIGHBORHOOD Lake Lucy and Lake Ann define much of the north and south edges of the new parkland, but the new neighborhood development to the west will also play a role in the character of the park. Trail connections to that neighborhood will allow residents of Chanhassen to access the parkland from the west side of the city. Lake Ann Lake Lucy P ow e r s B l v d Galpin BlvdHazeltine Blvd Lake Lucy2018What’s happening Dive deeper Aquatic plants Dunne, M. and Newman, R. 2017. Aquatic Plant Community of Lakes Lucy, Mitchell, Susan, Riley and Staring: Annual Report for 2016. University of Minnesota. JaKa, J. and Newman, R. 2014. Aquatic Plant Community of Lakes Ann, Lotus, Lucy, Mitchell, Susan, Riley and Staring within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed: Final Report 2009 – 2014. University of Minnesota. Wenck Associates Inc. 2015. Lake Lucy Aquatic Plant Management Plan. Watershed study BARR Engineering. 2013. Lake Lucy and Lake Ann: Use Attainability Analysis. Carp management Bajer P.G., Headrick,M., Miller B. D. and Sorensen P. W. 2014. Development and implementation of a sustainable strategy to control common carp in Riley Creek Chain of Lakes. U of M. Stormwater ponds RPBCWD. 2013. Stormwater pond project. Interested in learning more? Explore the following reports on our website. 18681 Lake Drive East Chanhassen, MN 55317 Contact usDISTRICT OFFICE CONTACT INFO 952.607.6512 info@rpbcwd.org rpbcwd.org FIND US ON instagram facebook twitter and find out how you can get involved Zebra mussels, an aquatic invasive species (AIS) were discovered in Lake Riley in October 2018. This is the first lake within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District where they have been spotted. Zebra mussels live in dense clusters and can spread quickly. They attach to docks, boats, rocks, logs, and other surfaces in the lake, and can threaten recreation and the underwater ecosystem. The District will continue to monitor the zebra mussel population in Lake Riley, and work with our partners to try to prevent this species from spreading to other lakes. ZEBRA MUSSELS FOUND IN LAKE RILEYDecreasing pollution, beautifying your yard, and creating habitat are all possible through a cost-share grant with the watershed district. The district’s cost-share grant program was created to help community members implement clean water projects. These could be projects that conserve water, like rainwater reuse systems, or projects that clean water, like raingardens. Awards: up to $5000 (25% homeowner match) Technical help available Interested? Contact: 952-607-6481 mjordan@rpbcwd.org GRANTS AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS THAT HELP PROTECT CLEAN WATER Lake Lucy is the headwaters to Riley Creek. Water flows out of Lucy to Lake Ann and then Riley Creek. On its way south to the Minnesota River, Riley Creek passes through Lakes Susan, Rice Marsh, and Riley. Size 88 acres Volume 558 acre-ft Average depth 6.5 ft Max depth 20 ft Watershed size 997 acres Land draining directly into 111 acres MPCA lake classification Shallow Impairment listing Mercury Trophic status Eutrophic Common fish Bluegill, Northern Pike, Yellow Bullhead Invasive species Curlyleaf Pondweed, Eurasian Watermilfoil, Common Carp Water that falls anywhere within the white border drains to Lake Lucy. CHARACTERISTICS WATERSHED BOUNDARIES 45% Residential 14% Open Water 39% Open Space LAND USE in the Lake Lucy Watershed N 2% Commercial Celebrating our 50th Anniversary in 2019. Learn more at www.rpbcwd.org/50years You can help! Remember to always clean, drain, and dry any watercraft and equipment when leaving a lake. Lake Ann Located in Chanhassen, Lake Ann is at the headwaters of Riley Creek. Over the past 40 years, Lake Ann has consistently met Minnesota Pollution Control Agency clean water standards. What’s happening DIVE DEEPER Aquatic plants Johnson, J. 2017. 2017 Aquatic Plan Survey: Lake Ann. JaKa, J. and Newman, R. 2014. Aquatic Plant Community of Lakes Ann, Lotus, Lucy, Mitchell, Susan, Riley and Staring within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed: Final Report 2009 – 2014. University of Minnesota. Watershed study BARR Engineering. 2013. Lake Lucy and Lake Ann: Use Attainability Analysis. Lake Ann Lake Lucy Powers BlvdN Stormwater ponds RPBCWD. 2013. Stormwater pond project. Carp management Bajer P.G., Headrick,M., Miller B. D. and Sorensen P. W. 2014. Development and implementation of a sustainable strategy to control common carp in Riley Creek Chain of Lakes. University of Minnesota. 2018 Size 119 acres Volume 2005 acre-ft Average depth 16.8 ft Max depth 40 ft Watershed size 250 acres Land draining directly into 105 acres MPCA lake classification Deep Impairment listing Mercury Trophic status Mesotrophic Common fish Bluegill, White Sucker, Black Crappie, Yellow Perch Invasive species Curlyleaf Pondweed, Eurasian Watermilfoil, Common Carp, Brittle Naiad Water that falls anywhere within the white border drains to Lake Ann. Interested in learning more? Explore the following reports on our website. 18681 Lake Drive East Chanhassen, MN 55317 Contact usDISTRICT OFFICECONTACT INFO 952.607.6512 info@rpbcwd.org rpbcwd.org FIND US ON instagram facebook twitter and find out how you can get involved In Summer 2018, District staff completed a series of fish surveys on local lakes, including Lake Ann. Staff set fyke nets near the shoreline, and fish swam in and became trapped. After a 24-hour period, they removed the nets and took an inventory of all fish inside, before releasing the fish back into the lake. These surveys help us to better understand the wildlife in local lakes, and assists the District in planning for future management. Species found in Lake Ann include black crappie, bluegill, common carp, green sunfish, hybrid sunfish, largemouth bass, northern pike, pumpkinseed, yellow bullhead, yellow perch. Nine painted turtles and one snapping turtle were also recorded during this survey. LAKE ANN FISH SURVEY CHARACTERISTICS WATERSHED BOUNDARIES Hwy 5 6% Farmland 2% Residential 45% Open Water 47% Open Space LAND USE in the Lake Ann Watershed Celebrating our 50th Anniversary in 2019. Learn more at www.rpbcwd.org/50years ZEBRA MUSSELS FOUND IN LAKE RILEY Zebra mussels, an aquatic invasive species (AIS) were discovered in Lake Riley in October 2018. This is the first lake within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District where they have been spotted. Zebra mussels live in dense clusters and can spread quickly. They attach to docks, boats, rocks, logs, and other surfaces in the lake, and can threaten recreation and the underwater ecosystem. The District will continue to monitor the zebra mussel population in Lake Riley, and work with our partners to try to prevent this species from spreading to other lakes. You can help! Remember to always clean, drain, and dry any watercraft and equipment when leaving a lake. The beach at Lake Ann Park Greenwood Shores Park The watersheds for Lake Lucy (top) and Lake Ann (bottom) LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 1 A HISTORY OF PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE None of the land around Lake Ann has been heavily developed. Historically, it has been farmed or kept in a more naturalized state of forest or prairie. Private property owners have preserved the land, which remains a unique asset for the community. The trees and open space along the edges of the lake in all directions contribute to the ecological, recreational, and scenic value of Lake Ann within the community. The site has long been identified in City planning documents for a trail to complete a loop around Lake Ann. Even as far back as the 1970s, a conceptual trail has been shown in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City acquired the parkland for Lake Ann Park in 1969 through a $250,000 referendum, choosing to preserve the shoreline for natural and water based recreation, and locating ballfields to the south between the lake and Highway 5. In the 1980s, with the development of the parcel to the east of Lake Ann, the City of Chanhassen was able to secure property along the lake to create a paved trail and continue the loop for the public. The development of the Greenwood Shores neighborhood also brought the dedication of Greenwood Shores Park, with a public beach on Lake Ann, as well as frontage on Lake Lucy. When the property that Lake Ann Park Preserve sits on became available for development, the City worked with the housing developer that purchased the property to dedicate and otherwise preserve the eastern half of the site, including approximately 40 acres of wetland and 60 acres of upland with over a mile of shoreline on Lake Ann and Lake Lucy. This long term approach to the preservation of Lake Ann’s shoreline for a trail loop will have preserved approximately 3/4ths of the way around the lake, with a desire to complete the loop if/when the current owner of the private property decides to sell or subdivide the land. A sign at Lake Ann Park showing the planned eventual connection of a trail loop around the lake. INTRODUCTION 1-3 NOVEMBER 2019 PARK SITE The recently acquired land is approximately 115 acres approximately split with 40 acres of wetland and 60 acres of upland. The remaining 15 acres will largely be used for grading and stormwater management related to the new neighborhood development. The site boasts approximately 3,600 feet of shoreline on Lake Lucy and 3,400 feet on Lake Ann. 2EXISTING CONDITIONS The Creek The Overlook The Edge The Cathedral High Quality Forest Visual ImpactsVisual Impacts Views Compelling Hill Lake Connections Greenwood Shores Park Edges of Forest, Wetland, & Grassland LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 Left: The Creek - Between Lake Ann and Lake Lucy Right: The Overlook - A unique hill feature that feels like a great place to stop and rest Left: The Cathedral - Maples have raced to fill in the canopy as Oaks have fallen Right: The Edge - A surprise when one emerges from the woods and into the sunlight EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-2 NOVEMBER 2019 TOPOGRAPHY The wetland complex running through the middle of the site separates the new neighborhood from the parkland. The east parkland sits lower than the neighborhood to the west, but well above the lake elevations. The terrain is rolling hills with a few notable nobs that provide long views across the lakes, especially during the winter when leaves are down. WETLANDS The largest wetland is a mix of forested wetland and emergent marshes with a few small pockets of open water. The wetland drains into Lake Lucy. There are also small perched ponds in the wooded areas of the upland park, all less than 1/2 an acre. LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 Left: Wooded wetland perched in the middle of the forested area Right: Wetland at the southwest corner of the woods looking towards the site of the new neighborhood FLOODPLAINS Floodplains do not generally impact the site, except in areas that area already wet. This does not affect the potential paved trails in the upland areas, but any crossing of a wetland that also has floodplain designation will require additional permitting and design considerations outlined in the following chapter. SOILS As part of the planning process, soil borings were completed along the trail alignment. These provide a better understanding of the soil conditions on site than the Soil Survey Geographic Database collected through the National Cooperative Soil Survey distributed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Please see the appendix for soil boring information. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-4 NOVEMBER 2019 NATURAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS OVERVIEW The proposed trail is located within undeveloped land, which is bordered by two lakes, single-family residential development, and city parkland. Approximately 5,000 feet of shoreline form the northern and eastern edges of the property. The western portion of the property is dominated by a 30-acre wetland complex, which flows north into Lake Lucy through a natural overflow. The site has been isolated from public access for many years, which has allowed a high quality maple basswood forest to flourish in the central area of the property. Invasive species, such as a buckthorn and garlic mustard are creeping into the site along the edges of the property, but much of the area is high quality, and represents historic vegetative communities. EVALUATION METHOD Visits to the site were completed on July 16, and September 19, 2019. Plants were observed and photographed in mid and late-summer conditions. PLANT COMMUNITIES A high-quality, old growth maple basswood forest dominates the central part of the property, which is an approximately 15-acre contiguous area. The high and enclosed canopy of the maple trees forms a mostly solid shade cover over the forest floor. This has limited the growth of shrubs and herbaceous layers, as it is light-limited, however where breaks are present, an abundant herbaceous layer and numerous tree seedlings are present, which indicate a natural seed bank is present. Naturally downed trees are located throughout the property, which provide habitat for wildlife and various fungi, lichen, and moss. The forest floor is covered with maple seedlings, leaf litter, and an abundance native plant species. Native species observed on the site during the two site visits are listed in Table 1. This is not a comprehensive survey, but represents the common and most noticeable species present. The edges of the site have been affected by various invasive and aggressive species, such as buckthorn, reed canary grass, and narrow-leaved cattails. The most prominent invasive species on the property is buckthorn, which is dense within the forested fringes and adjacent private properties. Several seedlings and large 2-3” caliper trees were observed on the site. The buckthorn was seen on all edges of the site and will likely migrate to the central area of the site if not managed aggressively to contain the natural expansion. Invasive, non-native species observed on the site are listed in Table 2. Table 1. Native Species ANIMAL HABITAT While not an exhaustive list, the site visits did observe the following animals or evidence of the following animals. The abundant habitat suggests there are likely more species than are identified here. • Deer • Turkey • Coyote • Frogs • Scarlet Tanager LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 Buckthorn Edges (Approximate)Buckthorn Edges(Approximate)Reed Ca n a r y G r a s s EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-6 NOVEMBER 2019 NATIVE SPECIES SCIENTIFIC NAME LOCATION VIEWED NOTES Ostrich fern Matteuccia struthiopteris northern edge of property adjacent to Lake Lucy Wood Fern?Dryopteris spp.Upland, central areas Jack-in-the-Pulpit Arisaema triphyllum throughout the site Zig Zag Goldenrod Solidago flexicaulis Upland, central areas Lindley’s Aster Symphyotrichum ciliolatum Upland, central areas Swamp Smartweed Persicaria amphibia Wet, low areas Pennsylvania Sedge Carex pennsylvanica Wet, low areas, central part of site American Hog Peanut Amphicarpaea bracteata northern and western edges and into the center property-ground cover Aggressive native Wild Cucumber Echinocystis lobata Western and northern areas Aggressive native Canadian Wood Nettle Laporta canadensis Moist areas Aggressive native Sugar Maple tree Acer saccharum Central area Northern Red Oak tree Quercus rubra Upland Oak wilt concerns Ironwood Ostrya virginiana Western edge Paper Birch Betula papyrifera Southwestern area American Basswood Tilia americana Cottonwood Populus deltoides Northwestern area Table 2: Invasive Species INVASIVE PLANT SPECIES SCIENTIFIC NAME LOCATION VIEWED THREAT LEVEL Glossy Buckthorn aka European Buckthorn Frangula alnus northern and western edges of property High Common Buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica northern and western edges of property High Garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata northwestern edge of property Moderate Reed canary grass Southern wet edge of property LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 American Hog Peanut Jack-in-the Pulpit Blue Beech or Ironwood?? Pennsylvania Sedge Ostrich Fern Ironwood Smartweed Sugar Maple Sugar Maple Glandular or Spreading Wood Fern?? Zig Zag Goldenrod Lindley’s Aster Native Species Garlic Mustard Reed Canary GrassCommon Buckthorn European or Glossy Buckthorn Invasive Species EXISTING CONDITIONS 2-8 NOVEMBER 2019 CONCEPT PLAN The concept plan was developed based on input gathered from the public, elected and appointed officials, and City of Chanhassen staff. The input was combined with an analysis of the physical characteristics and constraints to inform the layout, design, and features of the plan. The plan is based on the following 5 principles: »Continue trails around Lake Ann to allow for an eventual loop »Preserve the land as a valued natural area in Chanhassen »Connect residents with nature, trails, and parks »Protect the ecological functioning (habitat, water quality) of the site »Celebrate Lake Ann, Lake Lucy, and this property as community amenities TRAILS PAVED TRAILS A continuation of the paved trails at Lake Ann Park will allow a wide range of users to use the trail system and experience the park preserve. Paving allows walkers, runners, those in wheelchairs or with walkers, bicyclists, and skaters to enjoy the trails. Trails are designed to be 10 feet wide to safely accommodate various users going in each direction. Layout of the trails on the plan is generalized and a final alignment will require an on site flagging of the trail to better retain the vegetation and tree canopy on site. This also helps combat the spread of invasive species, many of which thrive in disturbed areas and outcompete native species in these locations. PUBLIC INPUT Throughout the City’s Park System Plan process, the desire for a connection around Lake Ann emerged as a key initiative for the City. Later, as part of the Feasibility Study process, the planning team solicited input from residents. Through in person attendance at events and with an on-line survey, the team gathered 523 responses. Residents were offered alternatives to different development approaches of the property. The key findings from the public input were: »Strong desire to protecting the natural environment, especially sensitive habitat »People are excited about trails. Sentiment mixed about material, but leans toward paved trails »Varied experiences for trail users (interact with the lake, different views, see unique areas) Surveys were provided online and in person to solicit input from the public Lucy Ridge LnRuby LnSapphire LnAt Rice Marsh Lake, the City of Chanhassen utilized on-site flagging for final trail locations to avoid trees and preserve the canopy of the site. The effects can be seen in the aerial, with the site located trail to the left of the red line, compared with the trail design on the right side, and the obvious cut in the canopy. 3CONCEPT PLAN LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 3-1 Lake LucyLake AnnLake Ann ParkGreenwood Shores ParkGalpin BlvdMajestic WayTopaz DrUtica LnUtica LnTecumseh LnBrinker StWalnut CurveWindmill DrLucy Ridge LnRuby LnSapphire LnPaved Trails - Built by CityPaved Trails - Built by DeveloperPaved Trails - Rebuilt by CityBoardwalkPrefabricated BridgeNatural Surface TrailsReconstructed Trail to Lake Ann Park - WidenReconstructed Trail to Lucy Ridge Ln - Address drainageNatural Resource Preservation/Invasive Species ControlProtect center of site from Buckthorn ExpansionManage/Treat/Remove invasivesPreserve wetlandsField align trails to retain tree canopySignage and WayfindingNatural resources/historical educationTell the story of Lake Ann trail loop planningProvide directional signage for trail usersNatural Surface Trail Waterbars and drainage crossings as neededNew paved trailNew paved trailBoardwalkSet elevation >floodOrient for viewsBoardwalkSet elevation >floodNew Paved TrailBuilt by developerNew Paved TrailBuilt by developerCoordinate grading for pond and boardwalkBridgeSet elevation to allow watercraft underParking+/- 6 spacesN200’600’400’CONCEPT PLAN 3-2 NOVEMBER 2019 Due to the soils on site, the paved trails will require a sturdier section than is typical. In order to mitigate against the high water table and challenging freeze/thaw cycles the overall section of the trail will be thicker and incorporate sub-surface structure and drainage. While this represents a larger up-front investment, it is a better long term approach, increasing the life span and reducing the maintenance demands. A typical trail section (left) and the recommended trail section (right) show the difference in construction methods needed to create a robust, sustainable trail. While a normal trail section may only require 3 inches of bituminous over 6 inches of compacted class 5 gravel, trails in this location may require up to 2 feet of muck excavation, geotextile fabric, select granular borrow, drain tile, geogrid, and 4 inches of coarse aggregate in addition to the 6 inches of class 5 and 3 inches of bituminous. RECONSTRUCTION OF PAVED TRAILS An existing section of paved trail connecting to the northern part of the park from Lucy Ridge Road will need to be reconstructed. The trail was constructed originally during the development of the neighborhood and has aged significantly. Depending on the staging and construction access points, the trail from Lake Ann Park to Greenwood Shores Park may also need to be reconstructed. In order to minimize the impacts to the Greenwood Shores neighborhood, the main construction access is anticipated to come from Lake Ann Park and follow the trail along the east side of the lake. The wear and tear caused by construction vehicles will necessitate the reconstruction of the trail. Illustrative sections Not for construction Existing Trail Condition from the Lucy Ridge Neighborhood LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 3-3 NATURAL SURFACE TRAILS In addition to the paved trail system, some of the natural surface trails will be preserved and enhanced to provide users with a secondary experience of the natural areas of the site. In some instances there are locations where water must be managed. In these cases, minimal improvements such as small culverts, waterbars, and plank boardwalks will be required to avoid negatively impacting the trails. The trails that exist today see minimal use and are not degraded as quickly as could happen with the transition to public park land. A key to preventing the degradation will be to manage water and avoid erosion. Left: The image illustrates a strategy for keeping trail users on the specified trail and out of the erodable creek bank. Right: Illustration of a look out off the side of the bridge. This could also include benches. BRIDGES AND BOARDWALKS LAKE ANN/LAKE LUCY CROSSING The creek between Lake Ann and Lake Lucy will be traversed with a prefabricated pedestrian bridge set on precast concrete abutments. The bridge should be wide enough to accommodate two way traffic and people stopping to enjoy the creek and lake views on both sides. This could include space for seating. The bridge needs to be built high enough to stay out of the floodplain, and to allow for the passage of small watercraft (canoes, kayaks, fishing boats, etc.) under the bridge. The design of the approaches to the bridge should continue the railings/ fencing well beyond the bridge so that users have committed to staying on the bridge and are not drawn down to the water’s edge. This is to reduce erosion and degradation of the banks of the creek. CONCEPT PLAN 3-4 NOVEMBER 2019 LAKE LUCY/WETLAND CROSSING Due to the long approaches and mucky soils, the creek that drains the wetland into Lake Lucy will be crossed with a boardwalk. The boardwalk should be oriented to provide views of the wetland and the forest. To the extent possible, it should also be aligned to minimize the visual impact of the grading and housing being built in the new neighborhood. WETLAND CROSSING A boardwalk will also be used to connect the south part of the new neighborhood to the park preserve. The boardwalk is located to minimize the length of the crossing. The boardwalk will also go across a Metropolitan Council Sewer Interceptor that is in the wetland. In order to allow crews to maintain that pipe, a portion of the boardwalk will need to be built with a longer steel span and be removable on a temporary basis. Maintenance of the interceptor is not a common occurrence, but the boardwalk does need to allow for it on an occasional basis. BOARDWALK DESIGN Both boardwalks will be designed to accommodate 2 way pedestrian and bicycle traffic. They also need to be able to handle vehicle loads such as maintenance pick-up trucks. The boardwalks should be at least 12 feet clear width with 4-6 foot railings. Boardwalks should also incorporate look outs to allow trail users the chance to enjoy and experience the scenery. The boardwalks are anticipated to utilize helical anchor supported H-10 design, where anchors are essentially drilled into the ground until they reach soils that will support the design load. As discussed above, a portion of one boardwalk will need to be removeable to allow for occasional maintenance to the Metropolitan Council Interceptor. In this instance, the span between helical anchors is lengthened and the structure of the boardwalk under this section is supported with steel I-beams. The elevation of the bottom of the boardwalk needs to be set above the floodplain elevations so as not to impact the flow of water in flood events. GREENWOOD SHORES PARK PARKING LOT The addition of a small parking lot at Greenwood Shores Park will help mitigate parking in the neighborhood and allow residents to park vehicles at Greenwood Shores Park while using the beach, picnic shelter, and park preserve trails. This will be done by relocating the existing gate and paving 6 spaces off of the entry drive.Uti c a L a n e Relocated Gate To Lake Ann Park To Lake Ann Park Preserve LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 3-5 Left: The image illustrates the helical anchor structural support system that will be used for the boardwalks Right: Illustration of an extended span with steel I-beams as will be needed for the Metropolitan Council Regional Sewer Interceptor Crossing. Both Images illustrate the character of the finished boardwalk in forested and wetland marsh environments. CONCEPT PLAN 3-6 NOVEMBER 2019 RECOMMENDATIONS PRESERVATION OF EXISTING HIGH QUALITY PLANT COMMUNITIES NATURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION SHORELINE MANAGEMENT With the beaches that are available to the public at Lake Ann Park and Greenwood Shores Park, the new park land design is not focused on bringing people to the water’s edge, unless they are on a sustainable surface such as a bridge, boardwalk, or dock. This will help reduce erosion and degradation of the shoreline as well as minimize the opportunity for the spread of invasive species to these locations. WETLAND MANAGEMENT The design of the park incorporates a 50 foot minimum buffer from the wetlands in all locations where feasible. This meets or exceeds the guidance provided by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for wetland buffers. In instances where trails are built within standard buffer zones, the locations are driven by a need to minimize erosion and grading impacts, or to cross wetlands on sustainable, constructed surfaces and keep people out of the wetlands themselves. FOREST MANAGEMENT Education, signage, and paved trails will direct future park users to avoid accessing the high quality areas of the property in order to preserve the existing natural resources of the site. Encroachment into these areas will directly damage vegetation, but can also spread invasive species. Etiquette signage and park rules should be posted at all entrances to the park to inform visitors of the value of the high-quality forest community. Trails should be clearly defined and direct visitors to access only areas where trails exist rather than promoting hiking through the high-quality areas of the park. Educational and interpretive signage along the trails should point out significant species and features of the forest and warn of the effects of invasive species. INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT The highest priority for management of natural resources on the property is to address the existing buckthorn. Management methods should be evaluated based on cost, success rate, and the size of the existing trees. Potential methods include: • Forestry mowing with follow up treatment of stumps • Cutting and application of glyphosate to stumps • Goat grazing of seedlings and small trees The Mn DNR recommends that garlic mustard is pulled or cut at ground level in areas where there is light infestation. Glyphosate may be applied in early spring or late fall when native plants are dormant. Reed canary grass may be treated in large swaths with aquatic glyphosate. Use of wick applications may be helpful to control reed canary grass, which encouraging other species to become established. Every invasive species management plan should include a phasing plan to ensure that initial and follow up treatments are planned. LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 3-7 OTHER AMENITIES INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE Interpretive signage should be incorporated into the park preserve along the trails in appropriate locations to help tell the story of the parkland. Themes should include: »Site Ecology »Site History »City Trail and Park Planning In locations where natural surface trails intersect with paved trails, foot cleaning stations should be paired with informational signage about invasive species to help prevent their spread. WAYFINDING SIGNAGE While many people may get to know the trail system in the park preserve, the new land will draw visitors and wayfinding signage will help them navigate and better understand where they are and how to get to where they want to go. Signage should be located at entries to the park preserve and at decision points where trails split. Left: An example of educational signage Center: An example of a boot brush foot cleaning station and informational signage Right: An example of wayfinding signage Left: An example of a fishing pier Right: An example of a bird blind dock WATER ACCESS While the best location is to be determined, there is an opportunity to connect park users with the lakes. This could occur with a fishing pier or a bird blind. When locating this feature, it is important to consider both the views it provides to users and also the views the dock will become a part of (what does it look like from across the lake?). CONCEPT PLAN 3-8 NOVEMBER 2019 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL 1 NEW BITUMINOUS TRAIL - PARK INTERIOR LF 6,250 $152 $950,000 2 RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL - NW CORNER OF LAKE LUCY ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL HOMES LF 1,250 $132 $165,000 3 RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL - EAST SIDE OF LAKE ANN - CONSTRUCTION ACCESS CORRIDOR LF 2,675 $100 $267,500 4 TIMBER BOARDWALK STRUCTURE LF 800 $1,000 $800,000 5 PREFABRICATED PEDESTRIAN TRUSS BRIDGE EA 1 $175,000 $175,000 6 NATURAL TRAIL ENHANCEMENTS ALLOWANCE LS 1 $100,000 $100,000 7 GREENWOOD SHORES PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS SQ YD 200 $125 $25,000 8 TEMPORARY ACCESS AND HAUL ROAD MAINTENANCE LS 1 $50,000 $50,000 9 EDUCATIONAL/INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE ALLOWANCE LS 1 $50,000 $50,000 10 INFORMATIONAL KIOSKS EA 3 $15,000 $45,000 11 WAYFINDING ALLOWANCE LS 1 $20,000 $20,000 12 INVASIVES TREATMENT/REMOVAL ACRE 30 $2,500 $75,000 13 FISHING PIER/BIRD BLIND EA 1 $75,000 $75,000 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $2,797,500.00 CONTINGENCY (20%) $559,500.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL $3,357,000.00 ESTIMATED OVERHEAD COSTS (ADMIN, DESIGN, ENGINEERING LEGAL) (25%) $839,250.00 ESTIMATED OVERALL PROJECT COST $4,196,250.00 IMPLEMENTATION COST ESTIMATE The following cost estimate has been prepared to provide guidance on the costs associated with build-out of the concept plan. This estimate was prepared in November of 2019 and reflects current conditions. Prices are subject to change based on any number of factors including, but not limited to changing labor and material costs, the bidding schedule and environment, phasing considerations, inflation, changes to the design, donations/volunteers, and other unknown circumstances. 4 IMPLEMENTATION LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 4-1 Notes: 1 - Includes construction costs associated with interior park paved trail construction including mobilization, 2-foot muck excavation, select granular borrow, geotextile fabric, draintile, geogrid, 4-inch coarse aggregate, 6-inch Class 5 aggregate base, 3-inch trail pavement, culverts, erosion control, topsoil, seed and signage. 2 - Includes construction costs associated with new paved trail construction including mobilization, earthwork (minimal grade changes), 6-inch Class 5 aggregate base, 3-inch trail pavement, culverts, erosion control, topsoil, seed and signage. 3 - Includes construction costs associated with replacing existing paved trail with new 10 foot trail due to construction hauling damage. Includes 6-inch Class 5 aggregate base, 3-inch trail pavement, erosion control, topsoil and seed. 4 - Assumes helical anchor supported H-10 design (bridge) capable of carrying vehicles, 12’ clear width with 4’-6” railings. Actual depth and size of helical anchors is unknown until sub-surface soil borings can be completed. Pricing could be greatly affected up or down depending on results. Assumes 400’ needed near Lennar site. Assumes 400’ at Bridge #2 location 5 - Assumes prefabricated truss bridge with precast concrete abutments. Assumes bridge spans do not exceed 35 feet in length. Includes costs for creating look-outs on each side of the bridge. 6 - Includes construction costs associated with narrow planked boardwalks, culverts, and waterbars to manage water and user impacts on natural surface trails 7 - Includes construction costs associated with grading, adding paved parking, curb stops, bollards. Relocate existing gate. 8 - Assumes temporary bridge is required at Bridge #1 location to facilitate boardwalk and paved trail construction. Includes costs to place wood chips or other materials to maintain haul routes into the site. 9 - Assumes costs associated with the manufacture and installation of educational signage related to the history, planning, and ecological functioning of the site. 10 - Includes costs for informational kiosks located at parking lots 11 - Assumes costs associated with the manufacture and installation of wayfinding signage at trail intersections and parking lots. 12 - Includes costs related to Buckthorn removal and stump treatment, spraying (Buckthorn, Garlic Mustard, other invasives), forest mowing. 13 - Assumes construction of DNR Fishing Pier or Bird Blind IMPLEMENTATIONNOVEMBER 2019 4-2 PERMITTING Based on site visits and review of available resources and rules, the proposed alignment can be constructed with minimal regulatory review. Permits will be needed from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the MNDNR for the two areas were wetland/water will be crossed, but these are reasonable provided the design achieves the goal of a complete span. Outside of City requirements, the primary permitting agency is the Riley Purgatory Creek Watershed District, which will regulate the majority of the project features. There will be components of the project that will need to be designed in compliance with their rules, however these all seem achievable. Pre-design consultation with the watershed district is recommended to discuss the project, timing, and ensure that they can proceed with permitting the project as design is finalized. The watershed district is aware of the project and has expressed an interest in partnering to ensure it is a good example of best practices. Overall, this project fits well into the regulatory framework. Certainly some components will require compliance with the rules, but I see no fatal flaws that would prevent the concept plans that have been prepared from being used as a basis for more formal processing and finalization. The main things needed are to: 1. Remain outside of wetlands 2. Maintain the minimum buffer setbacks 3. Ensure the design of the wetland crossings (the one into Lake Lucy and the channel between Lake Lucy and Lake Ann) are complete spans, do not contribute to floodplain capacity, and meet your trail design standards. 4. Have early and often regulatory correspondence. Based on the proposed trail alignments, the route will be able to avoid any impacts to delineated wetlands. Two channel crossings will be needed, but we assume that they will be constructed to span the channels, and have no discharge within the wetland boundaries. Permitting »It is recommended that the plans be shared with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Watershed District, and request a No-Loss determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. »The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also regulates wetlands in the project area, and will need to permit the two crossings. »The channel from Lake Lucy to Lake Ann would also be considered Public Water and would be regulated by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. »Provided the crossings of the channel and the wetland flowing into Lake Lucy completely span the wetland, there would be no mitigation requirements, however the MNDNR typically likes to see the crossing design include a hydraulics and hydrology report to ensure the crossing will have no effects on the lakes or channel. LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 4-3 »Floodplain impacts may occur if there is discharge within the floodplain. This discharge may reduce the floodplain capacity, which is why it is regulated, however it can also be mitigated if an equal volume of storage can be created. Impacts would be determined with design, and mitigation would be included within the grading plan. This is also regulated by the Riley Creek Watershed District. »The watershed also regulated grading and erosion control, the water crossing, and wetland buffers. Trails are allowed within the wetland buffers, provided the minimum buffer width is maintained. I am assuming that Lake Ann is considered an Exceptional wetland, and therefore you would need to keep the trail a minimum of 40-feet away from the delineated wetland edge around the lake. This appears to be possible, although some additional grading to maintain the desired slops may be needed to achieve. »Crossing the interceptor will require review and approval from the Metropolitan Council for encroachments. PROJECT PHASING There are a number of actions that still must be done to accomplish the full build out of the park preserve. It is preferrable for construction of the wetland boardwalk to occur in coordination with the construction of the developer’s portion of the trails at the south end of the new neighborhood to minimize impacts on new residents. ACTION NOTES Secure Funding Design and Engineering Soil Borings Wetland borings should be done in the early winter Permitting Can be done at 90% Plan Completion of design/engineering Bidding Preferred bidding environment in the fall for construction the next year Construction Set Boardwalk Structural Supports Should be done in Winter Construct Boardwalk Top Should be done Spring/Summer/Fall Construct Trail Should be done Spring/Summer/Fall CONSTRUCTION ACCESS AND STAGING The selected contractor will have their own approach to access and staging, but it must be consistent with the City’s goals. The construction of the wetland boardwalk is anticipated to come from the west in coordination with the development of the new neighborhood. In order to minimize the impacts to the Greenwood Shores neighborhood, the main construction access for the paved trails is anticipated to come from Lake Ann Park and follow the trail along the east side of the lake. There will still be some disruption to the Greenwood Shores neighborhood and the Lucy Ridge neighborhood as trails, bridge, boardwalks, and parking lot are constructed. This estimate assumes a haul road will be necessary for certain parts of the project, especially for a temporary crossing of the Lake Ann/Lake Lucy creek. It is of the utmost importance that all areas impacted by construction are restored to a natural condition. IMPLEMENTATIONNOVEMBER 2019 4-4 FUNDING SOURCES A number of funding sources may be available for the development of the Lake Ann Park Preserve. Possible opportunities have been identified from the City’s Park System Plan: GENERAL FUNDS General funds can and should be used to develop and maintain the parks and recreation system. General funds are the primary funding source for on- going maintenance, operations, and amenities. DEDICATED TAX LEVY A city can hold a referendum for a dedicated tax levy with proceeds directed specifically for parks and recreation. This levy can be used for capital projects as well as operations and maintenance. The proceeds may be in place of general funds or be supplemented by general funds. BONDING General Obligation Bonds and Revenue Bonds provide another source of implementation funding for new public facilities, as well as repairs and/or upgrades to existing facilities. GENERAL PARK BOND ISSUE Residents can decide to raise revenue through a permanent or temporary tax increase dedicated for specific purposes such as park, trail, and bikeway improvements and maintenance. These funds are usually provided through bonds approved as part of a voter referendum. PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION Minnesota Statutes allow local governments to require dedication of land or cash in-lieu of land for parks and trails from new subdivisions. The dedication must be reasonable and rationally related to the recreation demand created by the development. The land for the park preserve was secured in part through park dedication. Fees collected are deposited into the City’s park and recreation development fund or its multipurpose trail fund and are used for the development of new or expanded facilities. Park dedication may not be used for maintenance or replacement of existing facilities. UTILITY/FRANCHISE FEES Franchise fees are included on the monthly bill that customers receive from a utility, such as natural gas, electricity or cable. The fee can be a flat amount each month or a percentage of the monthly bill. A franchise fee can be implemented with an ordinance, which must be approved by the City Council. PARTNERSHIPS Public and private partnerships have been key to the development of the parks and recreation system. These relationships have led to the development of different types of parks, including natural resource management. The Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District may be a viable partner on this project to be an example of best management practices for wetlands and lakes LAKE ANN PARK PRESERVE FEASIBILITY STUDY 4-5 DONATIONS Private donations are another potential funding source. These may be financial donations from individuals or area corporations, or donations of labor from recreation clubs or use agreements. GRANTS The City has been successful at securing grant funding and should continue to pursue opportunities when potential award outweigh the costs for applying or administrating. MINNESOTA DNR The Minnesota DNR is one of the most comprehensive resources when it comes to state funding for park and trail programs. They offer a variety of grant programs and technical assistance. Current programs provide assistance for many features including recreational trails. Some programs also offer assistance for the development of parks or for trail amenities such as restrooms, lightning, benches, etc. Each of the Minnesota DNR grant programs is unique. The DNR should be consulted before pursuing a grant to clarify funding availability and qualifications. CLEAN WATER, LAND AND LEGACY AMENDMENT On Nov. 4 2008, Minnesota voters approved the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment to the Minnesota State Constitution which increased the general sales and use tax rate by three-eighths of one percentage point (0.375%) to 6.875% and dedicated the additional proceeds for the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund, the Outdoor Heritage Fund, Clean Water Fund, and Parks and Trails Fund. Funding from the Legacy Amendment is administered by a variety of agencies such as the Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, Department of Health, Historical Society, Minnesota State Arts Board and regional art councils. A number of new grant programs were created. Information about grant opportunities can be found on individual state department and organization websites. FOUNDATIONS & NON-PROFITS There are foundations and non-profits that are interested in fulfilling their missions by supporting local projects. There are a number of on-line tools that can assist with the process of identifying additional foundations that may provide financial support for park, trail, and bikeway improvements. IMPLEMENTATIONNOVEMBER 2019 4-6 SEPTEMBER 2017 City of Chanhassen Parks & recreation system Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Acknowledgements city council Denny Laufenburger, Mayor Dan Campion Jerry McDonald Elise Ryan Bethany Tjornhom Park commission Steve Scharfenberg, Chair Jennifer Hougham, Vice Chair Cole Kelly Jim Boettcher Rick Echternacht Meredith Petouvis Karl Tsuchiya Lauren Dale, Youth Commissioner Grant Schaeferle, Youth Commissioner city staff Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Todd Hoffman, Park & Recreation Director Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent Katie Favro, Recreation Supervisor Adam Beers, Park Superintendent Jodi Sarles, Recreation Center Manager Susan Bill, Senior Center Coordinator advisory committee Cheryl Ayotte Jim Boettcher Balakrishna Chintaginjala Karen Doster Jeff Filipek Jesse Hawke Kim Mcreavy Nick Mcreavy Courtney Miller Bellairs Todd Neils Nathan Pharis Elise Ryan Anna Simet Steve Scharfenberg John Tietz Dorina Tipton consultant Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. Thank you to the many members of the Chanhassen community who took the time to provide valuable input on this plan! i ContentsSEPTEMBER 2017 Contents Executive Summary iii Introduction 1-1 Importance of Parks & Recreation 1-2 How to Use the Plan 1-3 Planning Process 1-4 Existing Plans 1-5 Coordinated Planning Efforts 1-5 Trends 2-7 Existing Conditions 3-13 Community Context 3-14 Demographic Overview 3-14 System at a Glance 3-16 Needs Assessment 3-20 Vision 4-37 Guiding Principles 4-38 System Plan 5-39 Goals & Policies 5-40 Initiatives 5-49 Implementation 6-63 Priorities 6-64 Maintenance and Replacement 6-70 Funding Options 6-71 Funding Sources 6-72 General Capital, Operations, & Maintenance Costs 6-76 Project Review Process 6-78 Distribution Maps A-1 Community Engagement B-1 Phase 1 Community Engagement - Fall 2016 B-3 Phase 2 Community Engagement - Spring 2017 B-7 ii Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Tables & Figures Figure 3-1. Community Context 3-14 Figure 3-2. Historic Population and Metropolitan Council Population Forecasts 3-15 Figure 3-3. Age & Gender Distribution 3-15 Figure 3-4. Median Household Income 3-15 Figure 3-5. City Park Distribution 3-17 Figure 3-6. Key Findings From the Fall System-Wide Questionnaire 3-21 Figure 3-7. Key Findings From the Fall Senior Center Questionnaire 3-22 Figure 3-8. Key Findings From the Fall Recreation Center Questionnaire 3-23 Figure 3-9. Key Findings From the Fall Social PinPoint 3-24 Figure 3-10. Neighborhood Park Access 3-26 Figure 3-11. Community Park Access 3-27 Figure 3-12. Playground & Picnic Shelter Distribution 3-28 Figure 3-13. Traditional Athletic Fields Distribution 3-29 Figure 3-14. Informal Summer Facilities Distribution 3-30 Figure 3-15. Surrounding Community Facility Distribution 3-31 Figure 3-16. Preserves, Open Space, & Trails 3-33 Figure 3-17. City Trail Gaps and Identified Safety Crossing Concerns 3-34 Table 5-1. City Park Classifications 5-41 Figure 5-1. Regional Search Corridors 5-42 Figure 5-2. Park Initiatives 5-51 Figure 5-3. Facility Initiatives 5-56 Figure 5-4. Trail Initiatives 5-59 Figure 5-5. Preserve Initiatives 5-60 Table 6-1. Total Initiative Costs 6-64 Table 6-2. Prioritized Capital Investment Initiatives 6-65 Table 6-3. Prioritized Plan/Study Initiatives 6-66 Table 6-4. Prioritized Management Initiatives 6-66 Table 6-5. Ongoing Initiatives 6-67 Table 6-6. Trail Gap Priorities 6-68 Table 6-7. Maintenance and Replacement Costs 2017-2040 6-70 Table 6-8. Funding Sources 6-72 Table 6-9. General Capital, Operations, & Maintenance Costs 6-76 Figure 6-1. Decision Principle Checklist 6-79 Figure 6-2. Project Proposal Worksheet 6-80 Figure A-1. Playground & Picnic Shelter Distribution A-2 Figure A-2. Traditional Athletic Fields Distribution A-3 Figure A-3. Informal Summer Facilities Distribution A-4 Figure A-4. Informal Winter Facilities Distribution A-5 Figure A-5. Speciality Facilities Distribution A-6 Figure A-6. Surrounding Community Facility Distribution A-7 iii ContentsSEPTEMBER 2017 Executive Summary What it is? the 2017 chanhassen Parks and recreation system Plan sets the direction for parks and recreation in chanhassen for the next 20 years. the system Plan ensures the parks and recreation system continues to meet community needs now and in the future. the system Plan weighs community needs and desires with financial realities to ensure the system is economically sustainable and responsible with tax dollars. the system Plan determines priorities for future investment and contains 6 goals, 52 policies, and 54 initiatives Guided By: the development of the system Plan was guided by the city’s vision for the future as well as the following principles: Stewardship marked as the highest priority to chanhassen residents, stewardship aims to incorporate sustainable practices into the system’s planning and daily operations to protect the city’s vibrant natural resources. Connectivity chanhassen’s parks, preserves, and trails are knitted together to create a network of recreation and open spaces that reaches every corner of the community and provides access to surrounding destinations as well. Engagement residents of all ages and all abilities are welcome throughout chanhassen’s parks and recreation system, enabling them to lead active, healthy lives in which they engage with the outdoors, with art and culture, and with one another. Adaptable as chanhassen has evolved, its parks and recreation system has remained adaptable in the way it responds to new needs and challenges, and dynamic in its ability to deliver high-quality programs, facilities, and services. 1 2 3 4 Over its 50 years, Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System has improved the community’s quality of life, economic development, and environmental resources. With over 900 acres of parks and open space, 30 parks, and almost 80 miles of trails, the Chanhassen Parks and Recreation System is an essential component of the City. Planning Process This year-long planning effort began in August of 2016, and represents input gathered from the community, stakeholders, city staff, and city officials. Online questionnaires, meetings, focus groups, park and community tours, open houses, and group brainstorming efforts guided the development of the System Plan by providing valuable input and collective wisdom. The plan also incorporates the expertise of the consultant team, analysis of benchmarking data, a system- wide audit conducted by city staff and the consultants, and best practices collected from other peer communities. The goal of the planning process was to educate and raise awareness about the importance of parks and recreation while ensuring that future investment in Chanhassen’s system meets the needs of the community. Benefits of a Parks & recreation system Plan - Road map for system revitalization and expansion - Defensible rationale for decision-making - Strategic resource allocation (budgeting and staffing) - Fosters strong partnerships - Creates safe and welcoming parks - An updated recreation facility mix - A more connected City - Improved access to nature - Selective programming to meet gaps and needs - Long-term economic sustainability iv Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implementedin order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every day 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow OftenRespondentsUtilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments community engagement The goal of the planning process was to educate and raise awareness about the importance of parks and recreation while ensuring that future investment in Chanhassen’s system meets the needs of the community. Throughout this planning process, over 1,000 residents and stakeholders were engaged to ensure the final plan was reflective of community desires. Public outreach efforts included: »Six Advisory Committee meetings spread throughout the year-long planning process »Two listening sessions (Athletic Associations and Senior Center Commission) »Three online questionnaires and two online interactive mapping exercises which reached almost 2,000 individuals and solicited 1,500 responses »Seven Pop-up meetings at community events »A Community Open House held on April 6th of 2017, where over 70 community members provided feedback on the System Plan’s draft recommendations CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Online Community Engagement Summary Four different online engagement strategies were implemented in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often Respondents Utilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Online Community Engagement Summary Four different online engagement strategies were implemented in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% e v e r y day 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often Respondents Utilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Online Community Engagement Summary Four different online engagement strategies were implemented in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow OftenRespondents Utilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Online Community Engagement Summary Four different online engagement strategies were implemented in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often Respondents Utilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Online Community Engagement Summary Four different online engagement strategies were implemented in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often Respondents Utilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implementedin order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every day 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow OftenRespondentsUtilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implemented in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often Respondents Utilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implemented in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often Respondents Utilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLANOnline Community Engagement SummaryFour different online engagement strategies were implementedin order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% every day 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow OftenRespondentsUtilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments trends In order to meet the demands of a growing population, the City needs to consider the following national population trends: »Need for convenience »Increasingly anxious about safety »More transient »Pinched government budgets »Demand for green alternatives »Desire for conservation and opportunities to connect with nature »Increased interest in aging actively »Engaging new generations »Increased interest in weight loss and active living »Rise in informal adult recreation versus league participation »Popularity of new and nontraditional sports »Demand for group fitness events and races »Desire to create more memorable experiences »Increased importance of "place" v ContentsSEPTEMBER 2017 existing conditions »over 900 acres of city-owned parks, preserves, and open space »30 community & neighborhood parks »14 preserves & 1 special use park »almost 80 miles of trails Facilities 27 playground areas 21 picnic shelters 5 swimming beaches 16 tennis courts 10 pickleball courts 28 diamond fields 21 rectangular fields 20 basketball courts 6 sledding hills 4 sand volleyball courts 1 skate park 1 disc golf course 1 garden plot site 7 docks & 3 fishing piers 5 outdoor hockey rinks & 5 pleasure rinks 1 dog park (in partnership) 1 recreation center Lake Ann Park Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park City Center Park Chanhassen Recreation Center South Lotus Lake Park Kerber Pond Park Power Hill Park Riley Ridge Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Herman Field Park Pheasant Hill Park Sunset Ridge Park Stone Creek Park Pioneer Pass Park Roundhouse Park Curry Farms Park Chanhassen Hills Park Carver Beach Park Cathcart Park (Owned by the City of Shorewood) Sugarbush Park Prairie Knoll Park Rice Marsh Lake Park Bandimere Heights Park Greenwood Shores Park Carver Beach Playground Minnewashta Heights Park Chanhassen Estates Park Chanhassen High School (Joint Facilities) Manchester Park (To Be Completed in 2018) Minnewashta Regional P ark University of Minnes ota Land scape Arbo retum Raguet Wild l ife Ma nagement Area Privatel y Owned Public Golf Course MN Valley National Wildlife Refuge Olson Community Garden Minnetonka Middle School West CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreekDrive West78th Street Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstown Boulevard Pleasant Vie wRoad GreatPlain s Boulev a r dBa variaR o adSmithtownRoad Pio n e e rT railW estLo n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretum Bo ulevard Power s Boul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 LakeDriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard Hund ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail 82nd Street West F l y i n g C l o u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e Ma rshLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEND Open Space Community Park Neighborhood Park Preserve Special Use Non-City Parks & Open Space Public School Surrounding Municipal Parks Water Bodies Municipal Boundaries °0 0.5 10.25 Miles Goals & Policies The System Plan’s goals and policies are high-level statements intended to guide City decision-making over the next 20 years. The six goals represent the desired long-term outcomes of Chanhassen’s System Plan, and were prepared as depictions of how the Parks and Recreation System will function when the guiding principles are achieved. To guide City decision-makers, the general characteristics of each goal are described by a series of policies. 1. Provide a comprehensive system of park, recreation, and open space facilities to serve active and passive needs. 2. Maintain a comprehensive and easily navigable trail and sidewalk system that connects neighborhoods to park and recreation facilities, schools, community destinations, and other communities. 3. Ensure all residents have the opportunity to participate in recreation, education, cultural, and arts activities. 4. Be a leader in environmental sustainability. 5. Proactively plan for a high quality, efficient parks and recreation system that meets community needs. 6. Implement strategies to supplement the City’s capacity to maintain and expand the parks and recreation system. initiatives Initiatives are specific actions or steps that are recommended for implementation. They include programs, actions, or practices that support one or more policy statements, and begin to address the “who, what, where, and how” of achieving a plan objective. Chanhassen’s initiatives may include: strategic directions for policies, ongoing practices, partnerships, and future planning efforts; programmatic investments for events, training, and/or resources; capital investments for facilities, amenities, and/or infrastructure; and potential funding streams and strategies. Initiatives are organized by the topic areas of parks, facilities, trails, preserves, programming, and operations. The following page contains a summary of the System Plan initiatives by topic area. vi Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 implementation Achieving the vision set forth in the Parks and Recreation System Plan will take additional funding, not only for big, exciting, new facilities like a signature recreation facility or interactive water feature, but for neighborhood park revitalization, new programs, and outreach, etc. The City needs to ensure that adequate funding is available by identifying and regularly communicating system funding needs, expanding and diversifying funding sources, and maximizing the use of volunteers to support system development and operations. The System Plan identifies initiatives for the next 20 years in the areas of Capital Investments, Plans/Studies, Management, Ongoing Initiatives, and Trails. The System Plan also estimates that the system will need more than $8 million in maintenance, repair, and replacement. Parks »maintain lake ann Park as the premier community park »add amenities to Bandimere, city center, and lake susan community Parks »Use a maintenance and replacement schedule to keep neighborhood park facilities up to date »seek opportunities to expand the park network to serve changing community needs and preserve natural amenities. Preserves »continue to preserve sensitive lands within the Bluff creek corridor »collaborate with other agencies to protect the seminary Fen »collaborate with other agencies to protect the minnesota river Valley »expand marketing & wayfinding »expand opportunities to interact with and explore nature »identify & protect natural areas that link parks, preserves, & destinations »Develop natural resource management plan Facilities »identify and construct a year- round signature recreation facility in the community »add a destination splash pad at a community park »establish an interpretative center with outdoor lab space and nature-based play »add community-scale nature play at a community park and unstructured nature play throughout the community as appropriate »improve user amenities at existing facilities »explore opportunities for a second community garden »implement recommendations of the athletic Fields study Programming »continue to host at least 5 major community events »expand informal, year-round events & nature-based programs »collaborate with new & existing partner organizations to provide events & programming »establish an event management Plan »annually assess pricing structure trails »address trail gaps and trail crossing safety issues »Work with partner agencies to reopen minnesota river Bluff lrt regional trail »complete trail connection to minnesota river »increase maps and wayfinding to identify loops, distances, & destinations »Provide more user amenities »expand the number of natural surface trails »explore opportunities to add trailheads »initiate a single-track mountain bike trail study operations »Use system Plan as basis for budgeting & capital improvement Plan »incorporate sustainable design & maintenance practices to make chanhassen a model »create a tobacco use policy »communicate benefits of parks and recreation »establish formal review process for program & event development summary of Plan initiatives Priority cost (low)cost (High) Short term $5,770,000 $12,660,000 Long term $31,075,000 $63,100,000 Ongoing $500,000 $5,000,000 Trail Gaps $4,943,000 $14,831,000 total $42,228,000 $95,591,000 Estimated Cost of Signature Facility $25,000,000 $50,000,000 (Total Without Signature Facility) $17,288,000 $45,591,000 1-1 IntroductionSEPTEMBER 2017 1 Chapter 1InTroDuCTIon Over its 50 years, Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System has improved the community’s quality of life, economic development, and environmental resources. With over 900 acres of parks and open space, 30 parks, and almost 80 miles of trails, the Chanhassen Parks and Recreation System is an essential component of the City. This System Plan was shaped by the Chanhassen community, and aims to forward the City’s tradition of providing excellent parks and recreation by guiding investment and development throughout the Parks and Recreation System over the next 20 years. This Plan complements the directions established in the Comprehensive Plan, and provides detailed guidance in the development, management, and operations of the system. This direction is based on the community’s expressed needs and desires, as well as analyses of demographic changes, future trends, and Chanhassen’s current system. This Plan addresses community needs at a system-wide level. Specific initiatives, like the development of an individual park, should be guided by this document, but will require additional, detailed master planning. 1-2 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Importance of Parks & recreation When people talk about the places they love in the city or neighborhood, parks are typically at the top of the list. They are sources of civic identity and pride, and parks and recreation are also essential to the physical, economic, environmental, and social health of cities and their residents. Quality parks, along with schools and access to transportation, are typically the top three criteria people consider when choosing a place to live. Health A healthy recreation and park system equals healthy residents. Simply put, people who engage in regular physical activity are healthier and happier. When people have access to parks, trails, and recreation, they exercise more. In addition, increased exposure to natural areas has been linked to improved physical and psychological health. Recreation programs contribute to community health. Recreation programs offered for all ages (families, youth, adults, and seniors) promote life-long learning and a supportive community atmosphere. Specific programs can help accomplish other community goals, such as education about sustainability or youth development. Recreation and Parks encourage play. Parks are often cited as people’s favorite places. They are the places people go to have fun, relax, and play. Whether it’s a place to play a game of soccer, garden with neighbors, take a quiet walk through the woods or go on a vigorous run with the dog, a balanced park and recreation system has something for everyone. Property Values Parks and open space increase property values. Numerous studies show that proximity to parks, trails, and open spaces increases residential property values. Parks and open space can also positively affect commercial property and can be catalysts for redevelopment. Beauty Parks contribute to aesthetics. Parkways, tree-lined streets, gardens, lush landscaped areas, views of rivers and lakes, stately woods, and public art are all things that make a city a beautiful place to live, work, play, and shop. They make essential contributions to a city’s livability and vitality. keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here. WHat We HearD Townhomes Fronting Pioneer Pass Park Girl walking on tree at the Arboretum by Jason Lehman 1-3 IntroductionSEPTEMBER 2017 natural Value & environmental Benefits Parks and open space provide environmental benefits. Trees and vegetation found in parks, preserves, and open spaces improve air and water quality. These areas also play a role in managing stormwater runoff and protecting natural areas. cultural & social amenities Parks preserve natural and cultural heritage. Significant natural features, such as the Bluff Creek Preserve, numerous lakes, wildlife refuges, and Minnewashta Regional Park, are preserved for today’s residents as well as for future generations. Parks have important social benefits. Parks are often the focal points of neighborhoods. As places for neighborhood activities, celebrations, and informal interaction they provide places for community members to come together. How to use the Plan Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System Plan is organized into six chapters. Chapter One introduces and provides context for the plan. Chapter Two outlines national and local trends that impact current and future development and the use of parks and recreation systems. Chapter Three provides an overview of Chanhassen’s existing park system. Chapter Four contains the vision and guiding principles that guide the future of Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System. Chapter Five identifies the goals, policies, and initiatives recommended to achieve the guiding principles. Chapter Six provides implementation tools, including priorities to assist with future decision-making, general cost estimates, potential funding sources, and a process to review future project proposals. Throughout the entire plan, gray call out boxes are used to provide supplemental information to document text. Purple call out boxes highlight some of the quotes from community members who participated in engagement efforts conducted throughout the system planning process. The system plan is supplemented by two appendices. The first appendix has full page versions of the system maps. The second appendix has all of the input received during the community engagement process. It is important to recognize that the recommendations contained within this plan do not constitute all possible future actions. Instead, this System Plan provides a framework to guide future decision-making. Given the 20-year time frame, it is anticipated that the System Plan may need to change as the community responds to future trends, needs, and opportunities. As a supplement to this document, a Park System Inventory was completed that takes stock of the system’s existing amenities. Fall Kayaking on Lake Ann by Sarah McGinn Son & daughter walking at the Arboretum by Amy Huang 1-4 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Planning Process This year-long planning effort began in August of 2016, and represents input gathered from the community, stakeholders, city staff, and city officials. Online questionnaires, meetings, focus groups, park and community tours, open houses, and group brainstorming efforts guided the development of the System Plan by providing valuable input and collective wisdom. The plan also incorporates the expertise of the consultant team, analysis of benchmarking data, a system-wide audit conducted by city staff and the consultants, and best practices collected from other peer communities. The planning process was guided by an Advisory Committee that met 7 times throughout the process. The Chanhassen City Council and Park and Recreation Commission provided guidance and input throughout every phase of the plan’s development. Meetings between the project team and the City Council were held on September 26, 2016, February 4, 2017, and September 11, 2017. The Park and recreation Commission collaborated with the project team on December 13, 2016, March 28, 2017, July 25, 2017, and August 22, 2017. community engagement The goal of the planning process was to educate and raise awareness about the importance of parks and recreation while ensuring that future investment in Chanhassen’s system meets the needs of the community. Throughout this planning process, over 1,000 residents and stakeholders were engaged to ensure the final plan was reflective of community desires. Public outreach efforts included: »Six Advisory Committee meetings spread throughout the year-long planning process »Two listening sessions (Athletic Associations, Senior Center Commission) »Three online questionnaires and two online interactive mapping exercises which reached almost 2,000 individuals and solicited 1,500 responses »Seven Pop-up meetings at community events »A Community Open House held on April 6th of 2017, where over 70 community members provided feedback on the System Plan’s draft recommendations Open House Participants Open House Sign 1-5 IntroductionSEPTEMBER 2017 Existing Plans While this is the first Parks and Recreation System Plan for the City of Chanhassen, several previous planning efforts helped guide the development of this document. »The National Citizen Survey conducted in 2013 and in 2016 »Parks and Recreation Annual Report »2015 Athletic Facilities Study »2030 Comprehensive Plan »Bandimere Park Master Plan »Fox Woods Preserve Master Plan »County Road 61 Corridor Study Coordinated Planning Efforts Park system inventory As part of this planning process, a Park System Inventory was developed to take stock of every amenity present in Chanhassen’s existing system. The creation of this document acted as a starting point for the audit of the City’s existing conditions included in this Plan. The Park System Inventory provides detailed maps and information regarding every park within the City and is available on the City’s website. chanhassen 2040 comprehensive Plan This planning process corresponded with the development of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan. A parks and recreation chapter was written based on the recommendations established in this System Plan. 1-6 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 2-7 TrendsSEPTEMBER 2017 2 Chapter 2TrEnDS In order to keep pace with the demands of a growing population, the City of Chanhassen needs to consider how the dynamic nature of technologies, trends, cultures, and activities will affect facility and programming needs. The following chapter explores key trends and their potential implications for the parks and recreation system. By building flexibility into the City’s recreation and park facilities, Chanhassen will be able to adapt quickly and efficiently in order to meet these new demands. 2-8 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Desire for conservation & opportunities to connect with nature »72% of Americans see conservation as an “extremely” or “very” important role of parks and recreation agencies »Spending time in nature improves creativity and problem-solving abilities »The Chanhassen 2016 National Community Survey identified natural play areas as one of the top three desired facilities Implications for Parks & Recreation »Bringing naturalized habitats back to parks (i.e. Turf reduction) »Transition maintenance regimes from mowing to weeding (less time intensive but more skills required) »Preserve and provide access to natural areas »Offer educational/ interpretive programs »Balance active recreation offerings with natural environments »Include passive open space »Need for signage and education Desire to create more memorable experiences »The rise in social media as a method to share experiences through pictures and messages »78% of millennials would choose to spend money on a desirable experience or event over buying something desirable »Growing popularity in games and devices that utilize augmented reality (i.e. Pokemon Go) Implications for Parks & Recreation »Distinctive programming »Special events »Integration of art »Destination features »Incorporating hashtags and other social media-friendly components »Embrace and incorporate new technologies to get online-based users into the parks »Filming in the parks increased importance of ‘Place’ »The increased mobility of the workforce (telecommuting, freelance work, etc.) has resulted in individuals choosing where they live based on lifestyle and proximity to family and friends rather than employment opportunities Implications for Parks & Recreation »Co-production of services and experiences »Parks as economic generators »Distinctive spaces, programs, and events »Placemaking in parks and public places »Integration of public art »Destination amenities »Memorable features Rob Howard Photography Rob Howard Photography 2-9 TrendsSEPTEMBER 2017 more transient »24% of U.S. adults reported moving to a different city within the United States in the past five years »The average American moves 11.7 times during the course of their lifetime Implications on Parks & Recreation »Strong marketing and outreach needed »Adapt to changing residents »Flexible and multifaceted »Effective wayfinding Demand for Green alternatives »Transportation (biking, walking, transit) »Stormwater treatment »Maintenance practices »Native/habitat restoration »Education »Local food systems Implications for Parks & Recreation »Need staff knowledge about sustainable practices »Increased interest in community gardens »Interest in year-round commuting routes and amenities (bike racks, lockers, showers) to support transportation alternatives »Need for improvements to, and thoughtful management of, natural areas Pinched Government Budgets »Some cities are not investing in the upkeep of their parks and recreation system »Deferring maintenance and replacement creates a backlog that can become hard to address and leads to a negative perception of system quality Implications for Parks & Recreation »Investing equitably and providing even access to amenities across a whole park system »Keeping parks affordable »Need for new and stable funding sources »Balancing new and existing facilities; quality and quantity 2-10 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 increased interest in aging actively »America’s 65+ population is projected to grow by 147% between 2000 and 2050 »12.1% of Chanhassen residents were 60+ in 2010, which is almost double the percent of residents over 60 in 2000 Implications for Parks & Recreation »More senior recreation »More mid-day recreation programs »Cater park and recreation facilities to a variety of mobility and activity levels »Promote “fitting” types of outdoor recreation (walking, gardening, low-impact sports, etc.) »Desire for volunteer opportunities engaging new Generations »Children’s play has changed from outdoors to indoors since the 1950s, reducing people’s connections to parks and nature »The amount of unstructured play in a child’s day is 4-7 minutes/day on average »22.6% of kids aged 9-13 reported spending none of their free time on physical activity in the past week »American teens average about 9 hours of screen time/ day (excluding time spent at school or for homework) Implications on Parks & Recreation »Add educational/ interpretive programs that partner with schools & after school programs »Balance passive and active recreation »Offer spaces for unstructured, exploratory, and creative play »Offer adventures/ nontraditional sport activities »Incorporate technology into exploration increased interest in Weight loss & active living »62.8% of adults in MN are either overweight or obese »Less than half of adults meet suggested levels of physical activity »Obesity among children ages 6-19 has more than tripled since the 1970s »Every $1 spent on bike trails and walking paths saves an estimated $3 in health costs »Communities that offer parks & trails with outreach can increase the number of people who exercise >3 times/week by 25% Implications on Parks & Recreation »Park systems have an opportunity to provide outdoor recreational activities that encourage active living & healthy lifestyles »Convenient & well-connected walking, running, and biking trails »Accessible amenities »Recreational options for all ages in one place Rob Howard Photography 2-11 TrendsSEPTEMBER 2017 rise in informal adult recreation Versus league Participation »In 2011, participation in softball leagues in Minnesota was half the participation in 1994 »Basketball participation has experienced a 75% decrease since 1994 »Competition from other fitness options (running/jogging, bicycling, yoga) on the increase Implications for Parks & Recreation »Increase in demand for specialized recreation facilities (dog parks, splash pads, indoor ice, etc.) »Changing demand for traditional sports facilities (diamond fields, courts, etc.) »Expanded interest in entrepreneurs using parks for classes and events »Increased trail use (walking, running, biking, etc.) Popularity of new & non-traditional sports »Lacrosse has recently been the fastest-growing high school sport »Pickleball has become increasingly popular, particularly with Baby Boomers »Minnesota winters are getting shorter and warmer »Other nontraditional sports include skateboarding, rugby, ultimate frisbee, disc golf, rock climbing, single-track mountain biking etc., are on the rise Implications for Parks & Recreation »Requests for additional specialized, single-use facilities »Increased coordination needed to accommodate new sports that use fields similar to traditional sports (i.e. Lacrosse) »Potential for reduced demand for current athletic facilities »Increased demand for indoor ice due to lower quality outdoor ice and a shorter window for outdoor skating »More opportunities for outdoor recreation in the winter months accompany warmer temperatures Demand for Group Fitness events & races »78% of millennials would choose to spend money on a desirable experience or event over buying something desirable »Participation in adventure races grew 38% from 2012-2015, making it the fastest growing outdoor activity over that time period Implications for Parks & Recreation »Provide spaces for flexible programming »Embrace partnerships with local organizations for programming »Utilize park and trail facilities without interfering with daily users »Capitalize on park space to accommodate pre- and post-race events 2-12 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 need for convenience »The average American works 46.7 hours per week »Two thirds of all recreation occurs within a 30 minute drive from home »The mean travel time to work for Chanhassen residents is 23.4 minutes Implications for Parks & Recreation »Need for near home recreation »Flexible hours are needed »Increased hours of operation »Desire for individualized schedules »After school/work programs increasingly anxious about safety »While trails are the City’s most utilized facility based on the Chanhassen Community Survey, they are meeting the needs of less than half of the respondents - the majority of comments regarded the safety of crossing busy roadways Implications for Parks & Recreation »Better lighting »Safer trails and parks »Facilities closer to home Sources: »The Outdoor Foundation’s 2011 Outdoor Recreation Topline Report »NRPA’s 2016 Americans’ Engagement with Parks Survey »Minnesota’s SCORP 2014-2018 »USDA Forest Service Recreation Survey »Leisure Time Studies by Hofferth & Sandberg, Juster, and SGMA »Youth Media Campaign Longitudinal Survey »Parks & Trails Council of Minnesota: Minnesota’s Parks, Trails, and Public Health (2014) »American Heart Association 3-13 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 Chapter 3ExISTIng ConDITIonS 3 The foundation of system planning lies in understanding its existing conditions. A Park System Inventory was conducted at the beginning of this planning process, which involved identifying and mapping all of Chanhassen’s current park and recreation amenities. This audit is a standalone document that can be found on the City’s website. This chapter combines the system audit with demographic data, a gap and distribution analysis, the results of the first phase of community engagement, peer communities, and national standards to establish how well the City is currently serving the needs of the community, as well as how well it is positioned to meet any future needs that may arise. 3-14 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Figure 3-1. Community Context Community Context The City of Chanhassen encompasses 14,427 acres of land in the western portion the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. While the majority of this acreage is located in Carver County, 154 acres in the eastern portion of the City are in Hennepin County. Five major highways travel through the City, providing easy connections to surrounding metropolitan areas. With twelve beautiful lakes, two public school districts, 30 parks, a wide range of housing options, and over 700 businesses, Chanhassen offers residents and visitors alike a great destination for shopping, eating, entertainment, commerce, and recreation. Demographic overview Population Chanhassen’s population has increased significantly over the past 50 years, growing from 244 in 1960 to just under 23,000 in 2010. According to the Metropolitan Council, this growth is expected to continue moving forward, with 37,100 residents projected for the year 2040; almost 15,000 more residents than were reported at the 2010 census. age According to the U.S. Decennial Census, the largest age cohorts in the City in 2010 were 45-49 and 50-54, which are closely followed by the 10-14 age cohort. With the 20-24 and 25-29 age cohorts being some of the smallest, Chanhassen seemingly contains many families with younger children, but are lacking in young professionals. Over 12% of the population is older than 60, a figure that has doubled since the 2000 census. Demographic changes will alter the labor force and also impact preferences for transportation, housing, and park needs. For instance, both millennials and seniors will be seeking walkable neighborhoods and expanded trail facilities. 3-15 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 race + ethnicity In 2014, the majority of Chanhassen’s population identified as white (91%). Of the remaining 9%, 6% identified as Asian, 1.4% identified with two or more races, 1% identified as Black or African American, and less than 1% identified as American Indian or Alaskan Native. Just over 2% of the population identified as Hispanic or Latino. Households The total number of households in Chanhassen has increased by over 2,000 units since 2000. While the majority of households in the City are occupied by families (75%), the number of family households with children decreased by over 100 and the amount of non-family households increased by 5% between 2000 and 2010. These statistics are representative of a larger trend towards smaller households, resulting in an increase in the total number of households; an increase in the percentage of married couple, no children households; and an increase in the percentage of households with individuals over 65. income Chanhassen is an affluent City, with over 50% of all households and almost 65% of all families earning an income of over $100,000. Both median household and family incomes have increased by over $20,000 since 2000, and was at $108,078 and $125,303 respectively in 2014 according to the American Community Survey. In comparison, both the Twin Cities Metro Area’s median household income ($68,019) and the average median household income of surrounding municipalities ($99,524) was lower than that of Chanhassen for 2014. While the City’s 2.9% poverty rate is stable and well below the national poverty rate of 15.6%, consideration still needs to be given to whether the Park and Recreation system is sufficiently serving those with limited incomes, particularly by providing access to facilities within a walking or biking distance. education Of Chanhassen residents 25 and older, 96% have achieved at least a high school diploma, 60% have obtained a Bachelor’s degree or higher, and almost 19% have obtained a Graduate or Professional degree. These figures have remained relatively steady since 2000, and are comparable to those of surrounding communities. Under 5 5 to 9 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 39 40 to 44 45 to 49 50 to 54 55 to 59 60 to 64 65 to 69 70 to 74 75 to 79 80 to 84 85 and over 50.9% Female 49.1% Male Figure 3-2. Historic Population and Metropolitan Council Population Forecasts 128 132 182 244 4,879 6,359 11,732 20,321 22,952 26,700 31,700 37,100 - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 Figure 3-3. Age & Gender Distribution Figure 3-4. Median Household Income $108,078 $76,301 $95,697 $131,833 $113,719 $80,068 $- $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 aVeraGe $99,524 3-16 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 system at a Glance »Almost 1,000 acres of city- owned parks, preserves, and open space »30 community & neighborhood parks »14 preserves & 1 special use park »Almost 80 miles of trails Facilities 27 playground areas 21 picnic shelters 5 swimming beaches 16 tennis courts 10 pickleball courts 28 diamond fields 21 rectangular fields 20 basketball courts 6 sledding hills 4 sand volleyball courts 1 skate park 1 disc golf course 1 garden plot site 7 docks & 3 fishing piers 5 outdoor hockey rinks & 5 pleasure rinks 1 dog park (in partnership) 1 recreation center System at a glance The Chanhassen Park and Recreation Department manages almost 1,000 acres of parkland, almost 80 miles of trails, and two major indoor community facilities; the Recreation Center and the Senior Center. These amenities offer area residents, employees, and visitors numerous opportunities for active and passive recreation while providing invaluable benefits to the community’s ecosystem and users’ physical and mental health. system History Chanhassen’s Park and Recreation System is the result of almost 50 years of planning and City and citizen commitment. In addition to adding parks and trails to the system in conjunction with development, the community has supported major park improvement initiatives throughout the years. Three major bond referendums over the system’s history have allowed for major Park and Recreation improvements. The first bond referendum for parks was passed in 1969, resulting in the acquisition of Lake Ann Park, the beginning of the neighborhood park system; and the preservation of community character that is enjoyed by residents to this day. In 1988, the City saw its second bond referendum, which funded phase two of Lake Ann Park as well as the purchase of park land in the southern half of the City. Another referendum was passed in 1996, resulting in: improvements in 18 parks system-wide; the construction of Bandimere Park; the reconstruction of City Center Park; preservation of over 40 acres of open space; and seven miles of new community trails. Park classification Today, the City’s park and recreation needs are met by a combination of: city parks; city trails and sidewalks; school district facilities; private facilities; recreation programs; as well as non-city amenities including regional parks and trails and facilities in surrounding communities. Park classifications are used to ensure that a park and recreation system has sufficient diversity and geographic distribution to serve various neighborhood and community needs. In Chanhassen, there are four types of parks: community, neighborhood, special use, and preserves. Community Parks Community Parks provide opportunities for City-wide recreation and typically serve a 1-2 mile area. They emphasize active recreation by providing amenities like ball fields and soccer/football fields. Chanhassen’s six community parks are distributed throughout the City and most residents live within an easy drive or bike-ride. Over the next 20 years it is anticipated that additional land for community park facilities will be needed to serve the community. Because most of the new residential growth is anticipated to occur in two areas, south of Lyman Boulevard and on the west side of Lake Ann, it makes sense to look for new or expanded community parks in these areas. Chanhassen currently has six Community Parks, including Bandimere Park, City Center Park, Lake Ann Park, Lake Susan Park, South Lotus Lake Park, and the Recreation Center. 3-17 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 Lake Ann P ark Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park City Center Park Chanhassen Recreation Center South Lotus Lake Par k Kerber P ond P ark Power Hill Pa rk Riley Ridge P ark Nort h Lot us La ke P ark Meadow Green Pa rk Herman Field Park Pheas ant Hill Park Sunset R idge Park Stone C reek Park Pione er Pass Park Roundhouse Park Curry Fa rm s Park Chanhass en Hills Park Carv er Bea ch Park Cathc art P ark (O wne d by the City of S hore wood) Sugarbush Park Prairie K noll Park Ric e Marsh La ke P ark Bandimere Heights Park Greenwood Shores Park Carv er Bea ch Playground Minnewas ht a Height s Park Chanhass en Es tate s Pa rk Chanhass en High School (J oint Fa cilities) Manchest er Park (To B e Com plete d in 2018) Mi n ne w a s h t a R e gi on a l P a r k U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ot a La n d s c ap e A r bo r e t u m R a gu e t W ild l if e Ma na g e m e n t A r e a Pr iv a t e l y O w n e d Pu bl ic G o lf C o u r s e MN V a l le y N a t i o na l Wi ld li f e R e fug e Ols on C ommunit y Garden Minnet onka Middle School West CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th S treet Lyman Bou levard ChanhassenRoadCrosstow n Boulevard Pleas a nt Vi e wRoad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n eerT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m B o ule va r d Power sBoul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPion eer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeAn n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEN D Op en Space Comm unity Park Neigh borho od Pa rk Preserve Specia l Us e No n-City Parks & Open Sp ac e Publi c Sch ool Surround ing M unicipal Park s Water Bod ies Muni cip al Bou ndaries °0 0.5 10.25 Mil es Figure 3-5. City Park Distribution 3-18 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Tennis League Neighborhood Parks The goal of neighborhood parks is to provide informal recreational opportunities close to where people live. Chanhassen operates under the standard that all residents should be within walking distance, or about a half mile, of a neighborhood park. The walking distance must also be free of major barriers like major roads or water bodies to count as adequate. Because community parks often act as neighborhood parks for the people living in close proximity, a half mile radius is applied to both neighborhood and community parks to identify any gaps in service. There are 23 Neighborhood Parks distributed throughout Chanhassen, 22 of which are City owned and operated. Cathcart Park is located within Chanhassen and acts as a neighborhood park for residents north of Lake Minnewashta, but is owned by the City of Shorewood. Special Use Parks Special Use Parks are park facilities and amenities that target a specific user group and are not associated with an existing park. Olson Community Garden is the City’s only Special Use Park, and is a popular amenity in the community. Preserves Preserves function to protect the City’s high quality natural space, and usually involve minimal low-impact development. The City currently owns over 500 acres of open space protected throughout Chanhassen’s fourteen preserves. These acres encompass a large portion of the Bluff Creek Corridor, as well as other treasured wetland and woodland areas. notable Facilities City Facilities Recreation Center The Chanhassen Recreation Center provides the community with year-round indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. The Recreation Center is a focal point for many of the City’s community events and recreation activities and programs. The staff at the Recreation Center takes pride in providing a fun and friendly atmosphere for people of all ages at an affordable price. Facilities at the Recreation Center include a gymnasium, fitness room, aerobics/dance studios, five meeting rooms, and outdoor ball fields, tennis and pickleball courts, and hockey/inline skating rinks. Due to the popularity of the programs (especially dance) and the lack of meeting space throughout the community, the Recreation Center is often completely rented out. Senior Center Chanhassen’s Senior Center is a popular and highly utilized amenity for retirees, and is centrally located within the City Hall. The Senior Center provides senior programming including field trips, art and education classes, health and wellness programs, card games, and woodcarving. Recreation Center Weight Room Olson Community Garden Senior Center Card Playing Event 3-19 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 Non-City Parks & Open Space There are several non-city parks and open spaces located in Chanhassen. The locations of these facilities are highlighted in purple in Figure 3-5. Schools (ISD 276 & 112) The public schools in Chanhassen partner with the City to offer facilities for public use outside of school hours. The City has agreements for shared use at Chanhassen High School for school athletic fields. Bluff Creek Elementary School shares facilities with Chanhassen Recreation Center, while Chanhassen Elementary School shares facilities with City Center Park. While there is not a specific shared use agreement, Minnetonka Middle School West’s facilities assist in addressing needs for surrounding residential neighborhoods. Lake Minnewashta Regional Park This 330 acre Regional Park on the east side of Lake Minnewashta is owned and operated by Carver County with support from the Metropolitan Council. Facilities include: lake access, a fishing pier, picnicking, sand volleyball, a swimming beach, and trails. A new off-leash dog area was established in partnership with Carver County, the City of Chanhassen, and the City of Shorewood Parks Foundation. A fee is required for use. Camp Tanadoona Camp Tanadoona was started by the Minneapolis Camp Fire Girls in 1924 and consists of 63 acres of land on Lake Minnewashta, south of Lake Minnewashta Regional Park. Today the camp serves both boys and girls and offers overnight and day camps. MN DNR Lands The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources protects several areas of land within Chanhassen. An 8 acre parcel on the east side of Lotus Lake is preserved as open space. The DNR also owns 106 acres of the 600-acre Seminary Fen wetlands complex in southern Chanhassen, which contains a Scientific and Natural Area (SNA) that encompasses 73 acres and protects a rare calcareous fen and threatened plant species. The remaining 33 acres were allotted to the adjacent Raguet WMA. Finally, the DNR owns public land surrounding Lake St. Joe, which is just south of Roundhouse Park in northwest Chanhassen. Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge There are approximately 60 acres of the Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge within the City. The refuge was established in 1976 to provide habitat for migratory waterfowl, fish, and other wildlife species. Today the refuge is comprised of 14,000 acres stretching 45 miles from Fort Snelling State Park to Belle Plain, Minnesota. While some areas of the refuge have trails and interpretive signs, there are no public recreation facilities in Chanhassen. Raguet Wildlife Management Area (WMA) The Raguet Wildlife Management Area encompasses 270 acres, 190 of which are located in Chanhassen. The WMA is entirely within the floodplain of the Minnesota River. Natural communities include floodplain forest, wetland areas, and grassland. The management emphasis is maintaining and improving habitat for wetland species. The only public recreation access is for hunting. The Minnesota Landscape Arboretum The Minnesota Landscape Arboretum is a 1,000 acre facility, 675 acres of which are located in west Chanhassen. The Arboretum is a unit of the University of Minnesota and is a public botanical garden and an education and research institution. It features display gardens and exhibits, model landscapes, restored native landscapes, plant research plots as well as extensive plant collections, and hiking and cross country skiing trails. Educational offerings include children’s programs, family activities, adult education, therapeutic horticulture, and the Anderson Horticultural Library. The Arboretum hosts several public festivals every year as well. A fee is required for use. Golf Courses There are three privately owned Golf Courses within the City of Chanhassen, all located south of Pioneer Trail. Bluff Creek Golf Course is a 228 acre 18 hole course, Hall Greens is a 45 acre 9 hole course, and the Golf Zone is approximately 100 acres just north of the Raguet WMA and includes an all-weather driving range, putting and chipping greens, a 9 hole course, and a 18 hole putting course. Lake Minnewashta Regional Park Minnesota Valley National Wildlife RefugeMinnesota Landscape Arboretum 3-20 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 needs Assessment To understand the state of Chanhassen’s Park and Recreation System, this planning process involved conducting a critical evaluation of the City’s existing conditions, peer communities, national standards and trends, best practices, and community input. These analyses identified current and future needs and desires, which subsequently guided the development of guiding principles and goals, policies, and initiatives that work together to guide the future of the system. The evaluation process included: »Meetings with the City Staff, Advisory Committee, Park Board, and the City Council »Two phases of community input to gather feedback on existing conditions and future desires »Evaluation of the entire system of parks, trails, natural resources, connectivity, programs, and facilities, including an update of the Park System Inventory »Demographic analysis »Evaluation of current park classification system and standards »Evaluation of service areas, future growth, and development needs »Identification of issues and opportunities at a system-wide level »Comparison of existing supply, quality, and distribution of features and facilities to national standards and to peer communities »Evaluation of emerging trends influencing future needs of the system community input A variety of community engagement activities were completed over the course of this project to ensure the project remained reflective of community desires. This input helped identify satisfaction with the existing park system, the level of Park and Recreation use, opinions on the system’s needs, issues, and priorities, and desires for future system development. While opportunities to attend community events and hold stakeholder meetings were explored throughout the process, there were two major phases aimed at collecting public input, the first in fall of 2016 and the second in spring of 2017. Resident and stakeholder outreach methods included: »Seven Community Pop-Up Events »Athletic Association Stakeholder Meeting »Senior Stakeholder Meeting »Three Online Community Questionnaires »Two Online Social PinPoint Maps »Community Open House For a summary of all community input results, refer to Appendix #. Pop-Up Event Advisory Committee members 3-21 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 CHANHASSEN PARKS & RECREATION SYSTEM PLAN Online Community Engagement Summary Four different online engagement strategies were implemented in order to reach as many demographics as possible. Three online questionnaires captured public comments regarding the senior center, the recreation center, and the parks and recreation system in general. The fourth online strategy involved an interactive mapping software intended to collect geographic-based comments. This summary includes a synopsis of some of the significant findings from all four engagement techniques. 1 % never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthHow Often Respondents Utilize Chan Parks & Rec 8% few times a year 80% 52% 35% 75% 74% 72% 47% 29% 26% 66% 52% 21% 11% 6% Respondents’ Favorite Facilities By Percent Respondents’ Favorite Programs By Percent neighborhood parks trails community parks beaches recreation center preserves/natural areas diamondelds rectangularelds ice skatingrinks 18% tenniscourts 6% pickleballcourts communityevents youthactivities familyactivities adulttness adultpickleball 2 1 3 4 edenprairie victoria excelsior chaska Top 4 Destinations For Non-Chan Parks & Recreation Facilities Top 3 Desired Facilities natural play areas 75% outdoor pool 60% indoor pool 72% Under 50% Needs Met Over 50% Needs Met Not Utilized preserve/natural areas youth sports and classes trails adult sports and classes recreation center 0%20%40%60%80%100% 46% 21%17% 15%78% 44%14% 13%71% 31%23% 62% 42% 7% 16% Top 5 Unmet Facility & Programming Needs “While private rec facilities should ll the gaps in programming, something like an outdoor swimming pool should be seriously considered as a city run facility. Lifetime is the only option in the city and is not affordable for all.” “We are lacking in facilities to support our population here. A larger sports complex is needed.” “Keep up the great work and enhance our parks; one of the main reasons we live here.” “Improving our existing rec center would add value and encourage pride in our community. It should be a top priority.” Select General Comments Figure 3-6. Key Findings From the Fall System-Wide Questionnaire 3-22 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming 0%20%40%60% 50% 80%100% moreprogramming 73%27% tn ess classspace 73%27% large meeting/event room 70%30% indoor pool 39%61% tn essequipment 39%61% kitchen facility 40%60% indoor track 44%56% garden 64%36% hot tub 26%74% sport court 76%24% theater 56%44% café or coffeeshop 44%56% Important Not Important While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic. However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1% never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER Select General Comments 31% never 1 % e very day 33 % o nce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Senior Center 40% are unaware of it are not interested in what it has to offer 24% use a senior center in another community 12% Of Respondents That Never Use the Senior Center: Other Popular Responses: Women’s Club Driver’s Safety Class Chan-O-Laires 0% 60% 51% 42% eld trip 29% health orwellness program 4%woodcarving art or educationclass 27%card playing Existing Facility & Programming Usage 100%0%20%40%60%80% Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive Support For Senior Center Alternatives build a new senior center adjacent to the recreation center 35%40%25% maintain the existing senior center as it is 43%37%20% relocate the senior center to a new, larger facility 37%48%15% “I am proud of what the existing Senior Center offers in relation to programming but we will be out growing the facility with the shift in retirees. And we do have a dynamic and hard-working director in Sue!!” “From what I've seen, there isn't much offered for Senior Citizens that still work full-time. I would like to see some programs offered evenings or weekends.” “As the population ages Chanhassen needs a viable senior center. The one we have is very small and does not have enough programs. A theater and art space are very important to me.” “Please keep the bus trips so we can get to places we can't drive to and that have limited parking.” “The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you are considering a new community center please include the senior's space: Chaska's community center where all ages and all activities can participate is the ultimate (even church studies, meetings, etc.)” Figure 3-7. Key Findings From the Fall Senior Center Questionnaire 3-23 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center rather than the park system as a whole. RECREATION CENTER 20% neve r 5 % every day 24 % o nce a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Rec Center 13% are unaware of ituse private recreation facilities 18% are not interested in what it has to offer 35% use a recreation center in another community 18% Other Popular Responses: Youth Sports 0% 50% 39% 35% attended anevent 27% utilized thetness center 22% attendedopen gymopenpickleball participated ina class 26% 16% 9% hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party Existing Facility & Programming Usage “I hope it can expand, perhaps by moving to a new building and leaving the full building for an expansion of Bluff Creek.” “It is a very nice facility. I exercise there 3 days a week. The staff is friendly and helpful.” “The rec center needs to ll the needs of all community members. Currently, I feel the programming has a focus on children and families...” “We would LOVE to go if you had swimming lessons in an indoor pool, and much more creative classes to choose from (art, clay, music, theater....)” “More pickleball courts. As this sport grows, so should the number of courts.” “An indoor public pool and walking track like Chaska Comm. Center....the private clubs are so costly!” “We need an economical alternative to the expensive and overly busy Lifetime Fitness. Doesn't need to be fancy but something more like a YMCA or the Chaska Community Center.” 50% 0%20%40%60%80%100% Of Respondents That Never Use the Recreation Center: Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming running/walking track 85%15% kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms 69%31% additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34% senior center 56%44% "health" snack bar 54%46% a seasonal domedmulti-purpose e ld house 39%61% more exercise/class studios 28%72% larger tn essc enter 20%80% indoor pool 19%81% Select General Comments Important Not Important Figure 3-8. Key Findings From the Fall Recreation Center Questionnaire 3-24 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 “Can Chanhassen and other cities work to get a path all the way from 5 to downtown Excelsior?” “The city already has a future trail connection planned from Lake Lucy to Lake Ann Park. Make it happen!” identied trail gaps 22 “Bringing a full loop path around Lake Ann would be a huge advancement in running options for the city.” identied missing facilities23 “More painted/ signed crosswalks would be nice on Audubon as there is lots of fast moving trafc.”“Consider adding a shing dock accessible from North Lotus Park.” “[Southeast of Bluff Creek Preserve] is another wooded area that would be nice to preserve in its natural state and have public access allowed.” “We love the proposed trails near Lake Lucy and Lake Ann but do not want any of Prince's land to be developed! Keep land as a preserve!” 57 identied areasthey like “I love [the] walking path behind the High School and how we are maintaining the natural area here.” “The tunnel under 41 is a great way to get to the Minnewashta trails.” 63 identied areasthat need work “Need a safe way to cross Highway 5 at Powers. Underground tunnel?” “The trails around Lake Susan need improvement. Very cracked, pitted, bumpy and uneven. Have seen people trip and fall.” “The Chanhassen Rec Center is sub-standard compared to other adjacent towns. We could denitely improve it. Aim high, add an indoor skating rink and a pool.” SOCIAL PINPOINT » The majority of comments across all categories were in reference to the trail system » While “Like it” contained a high number of responses, many were constructive as well as positive, pointing out missing facilities, trail gaps, and potential opportunities » Many comments urged the City to maintain land around Lake Ann as natural, open space, and suggested the only development be hiking or skiing trails » Tunnels were highlighted as an important amenity for respondents, and many expressed desire for more along Highway 5, especially in closer proximity to the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum Social Pinpoint is an online platform that helps users place geographically-referenced comments in the following categories: “Like it,” “Needs Work,” “Missing Facility,” and “Trail Gap.” This method of engagement received almost 170 responses distributed throughout the City, which can be seen on the map below. A selection of the most popular comments are displayed ot the right by category. Key Findings 1 2 3 4 Like It Needs Work Missing Facility Trail Gap Figure 3-9. Key Findings From the Fall Social PinPoint 3-25 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 system components & condition In the 2016 National Citizen Survey, residents indicated that they highly value Recreation and Wellness opportunities in Chanhassen and ranked the City’s health and wellness, recreational and fitness opportunities, and preventive health services to be higher than other communities across the country. The survey also indicated that 9 out of 10 residents frequently make use of the City’s wide array of recreational opportunities. The City will work to maintain these high standards moving into the future by ensuring the system continues to meet community needs. Parks Chanhassen’s 30 parks comprise 888 acres of City land, providing 36 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. While the City’s park acreage exceeds national standards as well as that of surrounding communities, the number of parks is fewer than average. With the expected population growth of over 10,000 new residents in the next 10 to 20 years, the City should continue to look into expanding the number and distribution of parks as opportunities arise. Emphasis should be placed on currently underserved areas, as well as future areas anticipated to be developed with medium and high density housing. At existing parks, user amenities like lighting, benches, grills, wifi, and permanent restrooms were suggested as potential improvements. Accessibility to parks is excellent within the community’s core. This access is complimented by successful partnerships with school facilities and access to amenities in surrounding communities. However, pockets of low accessibility exist in the northwest due to the barriers of Lake Minnewashta, major roadways, and large lot residential development. While this is a gap, it should be noted that Lake Minnewashta Regional Park fulfils the role of a community park in this area. In the south, accessibility is reduced due to fewer parks, major roadways, and large lot residential development. Consideration of park access in the south should occur as development of low, medium, or high density housing occurs. Overall, the construction of additional grade-separated roadway crossings would also help improve park access. Carver Beach Park Pioneer Pass Park love all the programs, trails and parks available to us in chanhassen WHat We HearD 3-26 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Lake A nn Park Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park City Center Park Chanhassen Recreation C ent er South Lotus Lake Par k Kerber P ond Park Power Hill Pa rk Riley Ridge Park Nort h Lot us Lake P ark Meadow Green Pa rk Herman Field Park Pheas ant Hill Park Sunset R idge Park Stone C reek Park Pione er Pass Park Roundhouse P ark Curry Fa rm s Park Chanhassen Hills Park Carv er Bea ch Park Cat hc art Park (O wne d by t he City of S hore wood) Sugarbush Pa rk Prairie K noll Park Ric e Marsh La ke Park Bandimere Height s Park Greenwood Shores P ark Carv er Bea ch Playground Minnewashta Heights Park Chanhass en Es tate s Pa rk Chanhass en High S chool (J oint Fa cilities) Manchest er Park (To Be Com pleted in 2018) Mi n ne w a s h t a R e gi on a l P a r k U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ota La n d s c a p e A r bo r e t u m R a gu e t W ild l if e Ma na g e m e n t A r e a Pr iv at e l y O wn e d Pu bl ic G o lf C o u r s e MN Va l le y N a ti o na l Wi ld li fe R e f ug e Ols on Communit y Garden Minnet onka Middle School West CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th S t reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstow n Boulevard Ple asant Vi e wRo ad GreatPlain s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n eerT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m Bo ule va r d Powe r sBoul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPion ee r Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEND Comm unity Park s Ne ighborho od Pa rks 1/2 Mil e Buffe r* Non-City Parks & Open S pac e Public Sch ool Surround ing M unicipal Park s Water Bod ies Municipal Bou ndaries 2030 Planned Land Use Medium/High Den sity Re si den tial Low Dens ity Res ide ntial Large Lot Res ide ntia l Non-Reside ntia l Lan d Use *Majo r roadways are barriers fo r pe des trian ac cess , an d limit the re ach of m any 1/2 mile park bu ffers thro ugh ou t th e C ity °0 0.5 10.25 Mil es Figure 3-10. Neighborhood Park Access 3-27 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 Lake Ann P ark Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park City Center Park Chanhassen Recreation Cent er South Lotus Lake Par k Kerber P ond P ark Power Hill Pa rk Riley Ridge P ark North Lot us La ke P ark Meadow Green Pa rk Herman Field Park Pheas ant Hill Park Sunset R idge Park Stone C reek Park Pione er Pass Park Roundhouse Park Curry Fa rm s Park Chanhass en Hills Park Carv er Bea ch Park Cathc art P ark (O wne d by t he City of Shore wood) Sugarbush Pa rk Prairie K noll Park Ric e Marsh La ke Park Bandimere Height s Park Greenwood Shores P ark Carv er Bea ch Playground Minnewas ht a Height s Park Chanhass en Es tate s Pa rk Chanhass en High School (J oint Fa cilities) Manchest er Park (To Be Com plet ed in 2018) Mi n ne w a s h t a R e gi on a l P a r k U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ot a La n d s c a p e A r bo r e tu m R a gu e t W ild l if e Ma na g e m e n t A r e a P r iv a t e l y O wn e d P u bl ic G o lf C o u r s e MN Va l le y N a ti o na l Wi ld li fe R e f ug e Ols on C ommunit y Garden Minnet onka Middle School W est CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Driv e West 78th S t reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCros st o w n B oulevard Pleas a nt Vi e wRo ad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n e erT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arb oretu m B o ule va r d Power sBoul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPion eer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeAn n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEG END Comm unity Parks Neigh borho od Park s 1 M ile Bu ffer 2 M ile Bu ffer No n-City Pa rks & Open S pace Publi c Sch ool Surround ing M unic ipa l Parks Wa ter Bod ies Muni cip al Bou nda ries 2030 Planned Land Use Med ium/Hi gh Density Resi den tial Low De nsity Residential Large Lot Residential No n-Residential Lan d Use Lake Minn ewashta P ark, a re giona l park, ser ves as a co mmu nity park fo r the surrounding area an d re du ces the s erv ice area ga p in the north west °0 0.5 10.25 Mil es Figure 3-11. Community Park Access 3-28 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Facilities Chanhassen currently provides a diverse, well-distributed range of park and recreation facilities. Picnic shelters and/or playgrounds are present in all but one of the City’s neighborhood parks. A Neighborhood Park Picnic Shelter Initiative is currently underway that will add 6 more shelters between the years 2017 and 2018 throughout the City. The amount of playgrounds in Chanhassen is consistent with that of surrounding communities, and is within an acceptable range for anticipated population growth. A major desire of the community identified in the engagement process was for the inclusion of natural playscapes, play areas either made with natural materials or made to look like nature. The incorporation of natural playscapes can be addressed through replacements, upgrades, and when new construction occurs. For efficiency reasons, new playgrounds should continue to be placed carefully to ensure a 1/4 to 1/2 mile gap is maintained between like facilities. Lake Ann Park Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park City Center Park Chanhassen Recreation Center South Lotus Lake Park Kerber Pond Park Power Hill Park Riley Ridge Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Herman Field Park Pheasa nt Hill Park Sunset Ridge Park Stone Creek Park Pioneer Pass Park Roundhouse Park Curry Farms Park Chanhasse n Hills Park Carver Beach Park Cathcart Park (Owned by the City of Shorewood) Sugarbush Park Prairie Knoll Park Rice Marsh Lake Pa rk Bandimere Heights Park Greenwood Shores Park Carv er Beach Playground Minnewashta Heights Park Chanhassen Estates Park Chanhassen High School (Joint Fa cilities) Mancheste r Park (To Be Completed in 2018) Mi n ne w ash t a Re gi on al P ark Un i vers i ty of M i nn esota La n d s c a pe A rb o ret um Ra guet Wi ldlife Ma n a g e m en t A r ea Priv a tel y Ow n e d Pu blic G o lf Course MN Va l le y National Wild li fe Ref ug e Olson Com munity Garden Minnetonka M iddle School West L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M arshLake ¬«101 ¬«7 ¬«212 ¬«5 ")140 ")53 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive MarketB o ul e vardW e s t 78thStreet Lyman Boulevard Crosstown Boulevard P leasant View R o a d GreatPlainsBoulevardBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n e erT railW es tLo n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m Bo ulevard Power sBoul evardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 L a keDriveE a st He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail 82nd Street West F l y i n g C l o u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLake Drive Pioneer Trail East High w ay 101ChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEND Playground Shelter* Permanent Restroom Open Space Community Park Neighborhoo d Park Preserve Special Use Non-City Parks & Open Space Public School Surround ing Mu nicipal Parks Water Bodies Municipal Boundaries *There is a Capita l Improve ment Program in place to install picnic shelters a t Minnewashta Heights, Herman F ield, an d South Lotu s Lake Parks in 2017 an d at Sunset Ridge and Prairie Knoll Parks in 2018 °0 0.5 10.25 Mile s Figure 3-12. Playground & Picnic Shelter Distribution Picnic Shelter at Greenwood Shores Park Playground Equipment at North Lotus Lake Park Playground Equipment at Carver Beach Park another neighborhood playground in downtown chanhassen WHat We HearD 3-29 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 Traditional athletic facilities include diamond fields (baseball, softball) and rectangular fields (soccer, football, lacrosse). After evaluating current and projected population figures, the City is in excess of national norms and peer community comparisons for both the amount and quality of athletic fields. However, an analysis of field sizes finds that many of the existing diamond and rectangular fields are not large enough for adult games. Thus, ensuring a mix of field sizes is an important consideration moving forward. Additionally, the existing distribution for both athletic facility types primarily serves residents in the core of the City. Moving forward, the City should explore opportunities to place facilities to serve areas in the north, west, and south, particularly when non-city facilities, like schools, or adjacent community facilities can not serve the needs. During the community engagement process, residents expressed a desire for amenities that improve the quality of their playing and viewing experience. This includes lighting, permanent restrooms, and seating. Lake Ann Park Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park City Center Park Chanhassen Recreation Center South Lotus Lake Park Kerber Pond Park Power Hill Park Riley Ridge Park Nort h Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Herman Field Park Pheas ant Hill Park Sunset Ridge Park Stone Creek Park Pione er Pass Park Roundhouse Park Curry Fa rm s Park Chanhass en Hills Park Carv er Beach Park Cathcart Park (O wne d by the City of Shorewood) Sugarbush Park Prairie Knoll Park Rice Marsh La ke Park Bandimere Heights Park Greenwood Shores Park Carver Bea ch Playground Minnewasht a Heights Park Chanhassen Es tates Park Chanhassen High School (J oint Facilities) Manchest er Park (To Be Com pleted in 2018) Mi n new a s h ta R e gi onal P ark Uni ver sit y o f M innes ota Lan d sc a p e A rbo r e tum Ragu et W ild l ife Ma nagem e n t Ar e a Priva tel y O wn e d Pu blic G o lf Co u rse MN Va lle y Nati o nal Wi ld li fe Refug e Olson Communit y Garden Minnetonka Middle School West CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th St reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstown Boulevard Pleasant Vi e wRoad GreatPlain s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n eerTrailW estLo n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m Bo ule var d Powe r sBoul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0 L akeDriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard Hun d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEND Diamond Rectangular Gymnasium Op en Sp ace Community Park Neighborhood Park Preserve Special Use No n-City Parks & Open Space Public School Surrounding Municipal Parks Water Bodies Muni cipal Bou ndaries °0 0.5 10.25 Miles Figure 3-13. Traditional Athletic Fields Distribution Rectangular Fields at Bandimere Park Diamond Fields at Lake Ann Park Diamond & Rectangular Fields at North Lotus Lake Park the baseball/softball fields at lake ann need working bathrooms, covered dugouts, and bleachers WHat We HearD 3-30 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Informal sport facilities, like tennis, basketball, sand volleyball, pickleball, and open fields, are well-distributed throughout the community. Compared with peer communities, Chanhassen contains more than average informal facilities like tennis and basketball courts. To address the growing pickleball trend, the City has developed ten dedicated pickleball courts between the Recreation Center and Roundhouse Park. The Bandimere disc golf course is well-used with players requesting improvements like concrete tee boxes. While the amount of aquatic facilities is on par with those of surrounding communities, it should be noted that all of the facilities are beaches. The community has expressed a strong desire for additional aquatic facilities like an outdoor pool, an indoor pool, and splash pads. The Recreation Center and Senior Center provide year-round, indoor recreation opportunities. Community input has indicated that the current facilities are not sufficient. Residents desire a signature recreation facility that provides indoor facilities like a running/walking track, a larger fitness center, an indoor/ outdoor pool, meeting spaces, family activities, and additional fitness classes. Additionally, interest was expressed in improving the Senior Center by Lake Ann Park Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park City Center Park Chanhassen Recreation Center South Lotus Lake Park Kerber Pond Park Power Hill Park Riley Ridge Park North Lotus Lake Park Meadow Green Park Herman Field Park Pheasant Hill Park Sunset Ridge Park Stone Creek Park Pione er Pass Park Roundhouse Pa rk Curry Farms Park Chanhassen Hills Park Carver Beach Park Cathcart Park (O wned by the City of Shorewood) Sugarbush Park Prairie Knoll Park Rice Marsh Lake Park Bandimere Heights Park Greenwood Shores Park Carver Beach Playground Minnewashta Heights Park Chanhassen Estates Park Chanhassen High School (Joint Facilities) Mancheste r Park (To Be Completed in 2018) Mi n new ash ta Re gional P ark Uni ve rsi ty of M i nn eso ta Landscape A rboret um Ra gu et Wi ld li fe Man ag ement A rea Pr ivate l y O w n ed Publ ic Go lf Co u rse MN Va lle y National Wi ld li fe Ref ug e Olson Community Garden Minnetonka M iddle School West L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M a rshLake ¬«101 ¬«7 ¬«212 ¬«5 ")140 ")53 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive Wes t 7 8 t h S treet Lyman Boulevard Crosstown Boulevard P leasant View R o a d GreatPlainsBoulevardBa varia R o adSmithtownRoad P i o n e e rT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m Bo ulevar d Powe r sBoul evardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 L ak eDriveE a st He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastAudubonRoadPioneer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r i v e Chas k a B o u le v ardLake Drive Pioneer Trail East High w ay 101ChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEND Indoor Gym Ou tdoor Basketball Op en Field Pickleball Sand VB Tennis Op en Space Community Park Neighborhood Park Preserve Special Use No n-City Parks & Open Space Public School Surrounding Municipal Parks Water Bodies Municipal Boun daries °0 0.5 10.25 Mile s Figure 3-14. Informal Summer Facilities Distribution Pickleball Courts at the Recreation Center Basketball Court at Sunset Ridge Park Disc Golf Goal at Bandimere Heights Park 3-31 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 expanding awareness and adding more active recreation offerings, fitness facilities, and meeting spaces. While facilities of this scale exist within close proximity to the City (see Figure 3-15), residents express a desire to have these types of amenities within their community rather than having to travel to an adjacent community. . Figure 3-15 also displays that while an indoor skating/hockey rink is not provided in Chanhassen, there are rinks available in Chaska (2), Victoria (2), Shakopee (1), Eden Prairie (3), and Minnetonka (4). A key focus over the next 20 years should be the maintenance and replacement of aging facilities. Facility replacement should consider whether the same facility should be replaced or if a different facility should be built to address gaps in the existing system, needs driven by emerging trends , or a desire for speciality facilities. Examples might include additional dog parks, indoor facilities, lacrosse fields, pools or splash pads, etc.Lo t u sLa k e L a k e S u s a n LakeRileyRiceLakeLakeMinnewashtaLakeAnn L a keL ucyR i c e M ar shLake ¬«7 ¬«101 ¬«5 ¬«494 ")140 ")10 ")53 D e e p h a v e n E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k a M i n n e t o n k a B e a c h M i n n e t r i s t a M o u n d O r o n o S h o r e w o o d S p r i n g P a r k T o n k a B a y W a y z a t a W o o d l a n d J a c k s o n T w p . L o u i s v i l l e T w p . S h a k o p e e D a h l g r e n T w p . C a r v e r C h a s k a L a k e t o w n T w p . V i c t o r i a C h an ha ss en R e cr ea tio n C e n t er Sh ak op ee Co m m u n i t y Ce nt e r So ut hs h or e Co m m u nit y & S en ior C e n t e r Ed en Pr a iri e Co m m u nity Ce nt e r Oa k P oi n t Po ol M in n et on ka M id d le Sc ho ol W e st Vi c t o ri a Co m m u n i t y Ce nt e r V i ct o ria Ic e Ar e na Minn e t on ka Co mmu ni t y Ce nt er M i nn et on ka Ic e A r e n a Ed en Pr i a rie Se ni or Ce nt er Ch an ha ss en Se ni or Ce nt e r Ch as k a C om m un it y Ce nt er & Th e L o dg e P i on ee r R id ge Mi d d le S ch oo l Sa nd Ven tu r e Aqu a ti c Pa r k W ill i s to n Fi t ne ss C en t er Pa ge l I ce Ar en a Ch as ka M i dd le Sc h o ol E as t LEGEND Indoor Rink Pool Recreation/Senior Center Chanhassen Parks 4 Mile Buffer 2 Mile Buffer Surrounding M unicipal Trails Surrounding M unicipal Parks Water Bodies Municip al Boundaries °0 0.8 1.60.4 Mil es Figure 3-15. Surrounding Community Facility Distribution creating redundant systems that are already available in surrounding communities will only create an excess, therefore underutilized, inventory WHat We HearD FUnDinG Funding for park and recreation facilities comes from multiple sources. Under Minnesota law, park dedication funds secured from the subdivision and development of property may only be used for new or expanded facilities to serve growth. Maintenance and replacement of facilities must be funded through other sources, such as a city’s general fund. 3-32 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Preserves and Open Space Most residents are happy with the amount of perceived natural open space throughout the city and many would support additional preservation. Because the priority thus far has been to protect natural areas in their current state, access is limited and park preserves are not highly used. While the vistas created by open space are valued, desire was also expressed for increased access so users could better experience natural areas. In particular, residents expressed an interest in acquisition to support the expansion of natural trail corridors, particularly around Lake Ann and within the Bluff Creek Corridor. We neeD to have places for our wildlife to live - that is one of the most unique things about where we live. WHat We HearD Sarah McGinn Honorable 3-33 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 Plea sa nt V iew Pres er ve Ch anhas sen Natur e Pres er ve Ri ce M arsh Lak e P res er ve Bl u ff Cre ek Prese r v e Fox W oo ds Pres er ve He sse Far m Pa r k Pre se r v e La ke S u san Pres er ve Pine Hu rst Pres er ve Bl u ff Cr ee k Pre se r v e No rt h Lake R i ley Pre ser ve MN Riv er Blu ff s Pres er ve Hi dde n C ree k Me adows Pres er ve Lak e S u s an Prese r v e No rt h Pine Hu rst at Lake H arri so n Pres er ve Bluff Cr ee k He ad wate r s Pre ser ve CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th S t reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstow n B oulevard Pleasa nt Vi e wRoad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n e erT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arb oretu m Bo ule va r d Powe r s Boul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi on eer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeAn n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEG END Op en Space Pre se rve Exis tin g S ide walk Exis tin g Trail No n-City Parks & Open Sp ac e Public Sch ool Exis tin g Regio nal Trails Surrounding M unicipal Trai ls Wa ter Bod ies Municipal Bou ndaries °0 0.5 10.25 Mil es Figure 3-16. Preserves, Open Space, & Trails 3-34 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th S t reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCross town B oulevard Pleasa nt Vi e wRoad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n e erTrailW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arb oretu m B o uleva r d Powe r s Boul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r s h L a k e E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEN D ""Existing Overpass ##Existing Tra il Head !!Existing Underpa ss GIdentified Sa fety C ro ssing Concern Trail Gap Existing Sidewalk Existing Tra il Op en Space Commu nity Pa rk Ne igh borhoo d Park Prese rve Spec ial Use No n-City Park s & Open Space Publi c School Existing Regional Trails Surround ing Mun ici pal Tra ils Surround ing Mun ici pal Parks Water Bodi es Muni cipal Boundarie s °0 0.5 10.25 Mile s Figure 3-17. City Trail Gaps and Identified Safety Crossing Concerns 3-35 Existing ConditionsSEPTEMBER 2017 Trails Chanhassen’s 76 miles of trails have been identified as the most popular facility provided in the community. This city-wide system helps connect neighborhoods to parks, schools, commercial and civic destinations, and adjacent communities. The City is committed to providing pedestrians and cyclists with safe crossings of major roadways. Currently the City has a pedestrian bridge over Highway 5 as well as more than ten underpasses city-wide. Safe crossings were a topic discussed throughout the system planning process. Specific locations where additional crossing improvements are needed are identified in Figure 3-17. In addition to safe crossings, trail users requested additional amenities to improve their trail riding experience. These requests include benches, wayfinding, and lighting to enhance safety and extend year-round use. Several regional trails connect Chanhassen to surrounding communities and destinations, including the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail to the north and the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail and the Highway 101 Regional Trail to the south. Both of the LRT Regional Trail corridors are owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) and are slotted for future light rail transit use. A cooperative agreement between HCRRA and Three Rivers Park District allows the corridors to be used for interim recreational purposes. Currently there are natural surface trails in Fox Woods Preserve, Carver Beach Park, Lake Ann Park, Carver Pond Park, and Stone Creek Park. Community members expressed a desire for additional natural surface trails, particularly as a way to further explore natural areas, whether in preserves or parks. North Lotus Lake Park Trail Trail crossing on Powers Boulevard it would be wonderful to have more trash cans along the trails! WHat We HearD 3-36 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Wood Carving by Chanhassen Woodcarvers Programming The City of Chanhassen offers a range of recreation and social programs for all ages. These currently include: crafts, dance, and sports for preschool aged children; crafts, sports, self-defence, ski and snowboards, and dance programs for youth; programs serving individuals with developmental disabilities and their families; fitness and sports programs for adults; community-wide events that occur annually; and educational programs, swimming, clubs, field trips, meal and driving programs for seniors. According to the online system-wide questionnaire performed in Fall of 2016, community events are the most popular type of programming offered by the City, as can be seen in Figure 3-6. Annual events hosted by the City and supported by area businesses and local service clubs include February Festival, Easter Egg / Candy Hunt, Arbor Day Celebration, July 4th Celebration, Fire Department Open House, Halloween Party, and Tree Lighting Ceremony. While these events are well-attended, there continues to be an interest for additional events throughout the year. The City has good working relationships with recreation groups and associations, who do a good job of providing a variety of programs. Improved amenities that support events, like picnic shelters with amenities to support food preparation, would help encourage existing and future programming. The City provides introductory level athletic programming for very young children (under 6) and team, league athletics (softball) for adults. There is a desire from some residents that the young athletic programming be improved in terms of structure and coaching. Additionally, interest has been expressed for more older youth and adult programming in arts, fitness, and outdoor education. There is also desire from many residents for the City to provide more programming, such as aquatics, to meet the needs of those who prefer public recreation programs. Management and Operations There are concerns about deferred maintenance issues, especially in small neighborhood parks (playgrounds, basketball courts, hockey rinks). Concerns also existing surrounding the maintenance of natural resources and lake water quality. Overall, recognition is needed that ongoing investments will be required to maintain the quality of the existing system into the future. Fourth of July Parade Summer Concert Series Easter Egg/Candy Hunt 4-37 VisionSEPTEMBER 2017 Chapter 4VISIon 4 As the City of Chanhassen develops and changes over the course of the next 20 years, its Parks and Recreation System must likewise evolve. New opportunities will present themselves, as will new challenges. Sustaining a desirable park and recreation system throughout this evolution will require a shared community vision and set of guiding principles. The vision seeks to describe how the community will look, feel, and function over the next 20 years. The community’s shared vision identified in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, “Chanhassen is a Community for Life – Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow,” captures the community’s intent of being a desirable place to live, work, and recreate for all ages. 4-38 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 guiding Principles Shaping the implementation of Chanhassen’s vision specifically in the Parks and Recreation System is a set of four Guiding Principles. These Principles provide an over-arching framework that informs the development of specific goals, policies, and initiatives. They are also a tool for future decision-making, serving as a yardstick to measure the results of this plan and the appropriateness of future initiatives. stewardship Stewardship is one of the hallmarks of Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System. An extensive network of preserves gives residents the opportunity to explore and learn about Chanhassen’s rich web of natural resources. Greater awareness of Chanhassen’s prairies, wetlands, lakes, rivers, forests, and wildlife has led to a greater understanding of the role those resources play in making the community a great place. Chanhassen’s citizens have embraced their role as stewards of their city’s natural resources. They understand the need to conserve Chanhassen’s natural resources so they will continue to enrich future generations, and they advocate continuing to incorporate sustainability practices such as sustainable design, native plant diversity, and ecological maintenance into the system’s planning and daily operations. connectivity Connectedness is at the heart of Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation System. The system itself is connected; its parks, preserves, and trails knitted together to create a network of recreation and open spaces that reaches every corner of the community. This network connects residents, neighborhoods, and destinations to one another, strengthening the community and enabling all to enjoy safe, easy, and convenient travel throughout the community and to neighboring cities. Likewise the system’s facilities and programs not only connect residents to one another, but they also connect residents to the outdoors and to Chanhassen’s wealth of natural resources. engagement Chanhassen’s Parks and Recreation system welcomes residents of all ages and all abilities, enabling them to lead active, healthy lives in which they engage with the outdoors, with art and culture, and with one another. Partnerships with private entities, neighborhood and community organizations, athletic associations, user groups, businesses, and schools have created a sense of shared ownership and pride across all segments of the community, leading to active participation in system planning, operation, and maintenance. The system’s high quality facilities and programs are a source of community pride that inspire life-long discovery, learning, and socializing. adaptable As Chanhassen has evolved, becoming a larger, more economically and culturally diverse community, its Parks and Recreation System remains adaptable in the way it responds to new needs and challenges, and dynamic in its ability to deliver high-quality programs, facilities, and services. Increased partnerships with groups, organizations, and businesses representing all segments of the community have resulted in new and diverse sources of funding and an infusion of new ideas, energy and enthusiasm. These partnerships have increased the system’s versatility, enabling staff and volunteers to adjust to lifestyle changes, respond to new trends, and enhance the system’s quality and efficiency. Chapter 5SySTEM PlAn 5 The system plan recommendations were drafted based on the findings from the needs assessment, peer community and national standards analysis, community input, review of the previous Comprehensive Plan, Advisory Committee discussions, and meetings with City Staff. The recommendations are organized into goals, policies, and strategies. Goals are broad statements that describe the desired long-term outcomes needed for the system’s guiding principles to be achieved. The next level, policies, are statements that will guide City decision-making to achieve the goals. Policies are followed by initiatives, which describe the specific actions or steps that need to be taken. To support and further clarify the initiatives, maps for parks, facilities, trails, and preserves have been included that exhibit the distribution of the Plan’s recommendations. Precedent imagery is present throughout the System Plan to illustrate the potential appearances of proposed facilities and amenities. 5-39 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 goals & Policies The System Plan’s goals and policies are high-level statements intended to guide City decision-making over the next 20 years. The six goals represent the desired long-term outcomes of Chanhassen’s System Plan, and were prepared as depictions of how the Parks and Recreation System will function when the guiding principles are achieved. To guide City decision-makers, the general characteristics of each goal are described by a series of policies. In the System Plan hierarchy, goals are the highest level and are numbered 1-6, while policies are numbered 1.1, 1.2., etc. so it is clear to which goal a specific policy relates. Goal 1. Provide a comprehensive system of park, recreation, and open space facilities to serve active and passive needs. 1.1. Provide a system that includes neighborhood parks, community parks, preserves, and special use parks based on the standards outlined in Table 5-1. 1.2. Ensure residents have convenient access to park and recreation facilities at the neighborhood and community park level by ensuring all residents are within a ½ mile of a neighborhood park and 2 miles of a community park. 1.3. Provide a mix of athletic complexes with user amenities to meet the needs of recreational, league, and tournament play. 1.4. Provide user amenities as appropriate for the type of park 1.4.1. To serve local users walking or biking to their neighborhood park, provide user amenities like benches, bike racks, shade trees, trash and recycling receptacles, and seasonal restrooms. 1.4.2. To serve community and regional users, provide at community parks amenities like benches, picnic tables, bike racks, information kiosks, shelters, permanent restrooms, trash and recycling receptacles, and access to technology. 1.5. Balance the use of park and recreational facilities for local needs with events, tournaments, gatherings, and programming. 1.6. Support year-round recreation through a mixture of indoor and outdoor facilities. 1.7. Explore opportunities to expand the number and quality of the community’s preserves to protect natural areas that are ecologically sensitive or representative of the City’s natural heritage. 1.8. Provide areas for small and large group community gathering through the distribution of shelters in neighborhood and community parks. 1.9. Seek opportunities to distribute standalone playgrounds for 2 to 5 year olds throughout the community. Bandimere Park athletic fields Wifi Access in Parks needs are being met but more benches on trails would be nice WHat We HearD Please do more winter gatherings, the nights are so long here we need more events to get people outside WHat We HearD 5-40 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 neiGHBorHooD Park DesiGn case study: roundhouse Park When redeveloping or designing a new neighborhood park, it is important and essential to inform and involve the neighbors of the park. In the summer of 2015, neighbors gathered at Roundhouse Park with Park Commission members, city staff, and park designers to discuss how the park should be improved. The City had plans to add pickleball and tennis courts, but wanted the residents input on how they should be designed and incorporated into the park. Some of the residents expressed interest that the basketball court be kept in the park. The park master plan was updated to include a new basketball half court. The neighborhood meeting was a useful exercise to inform the residents of the plans and gather input on how to design the improvements. Neighborhood Meeting at Roundhouse Park classification Use service area size (typical)examples Community Provides facilities serving the community with programmed, active recreation areas and access to natural areas. May serve regional visitors, although not as primary function. Community wide in strategic, consolidated locations at a few sites 15 to 100 acres Lake Ann Park, Bandimere Park Neighborhood Primary recreation facility to meet the day-to- day needs of neighborhoods. Provides active recreation and informal gathering spaces for families and groups of neighbors. Fields are sized for practice/youth games. 1/2 mile radius, free of major barriers such as highways or waterways <15 acres North Lotus Lake Park, Pioneer Pass Park Preserve Areas focused on the provision of natural environments, passive recreation, and ecological education. Community & Regional Draw Centered around natural resources and amenities Fox Woods Preserve, Bluff Creek Preserve Special Use Areas primarily serving a single-use activity.Community & Regional Draw Site specific Olson Community Garden Table 5-1. City Park Classifications Grand Opening Promotional Flyer Pickleball Courts 5-41 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 2040 reGional trail searcH corriDors The Metropolitan Council has established general search corridors for new regional trails or extensions of existing regional trails. These corridors were designated in order to create connections between regional parks and trails. The map below displays regional trail search corridors that intersect with the City of Chanhassen. While corridors have been identified, the specific alignment of the regional trails will still need to be determined through a planning process led by the regional park implementing agency. L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeAn n L a keL ucy¬«101 ¬«7 ¬«212 ")140 ")53 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th S t reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstown B oulevard Pleas ant Vi e wRo ad GreatPlain s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n e erTrailW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m B o ule va r d PowersBoulevardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail 82nd Street West Ma rk e t BoulevardFlyin g Cloud D r i v e Chas k a B o u le v ardLake Drive Pioneer Trail East Hig h w ay 101ChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreetLEGEND ""Ov erpa ss ##Trail Hea d !!Underpass Existing , Sid ewalk Future, Sidewalk Existing , Trai l Future, Trail Open Spa ce Commu nity Park Ne igh borhoo d Park Preserve Special Use Non-City Parks & Op en Space Public Scho ol Wa ter Bodies Municipa l Boun darie s Surround ing Mu nici pal Trails Surround ing Mu nici pal Parks Existing Region al Trai ls Re gio nal Tra il Sea rch Corridor Re gio nal Tra il - 20 40 System Ad ditio n 2030 Planned Land U se Medium/Hig h Density Residential Low De nsity Res iden tial Large L ot Resi den tial °0 0.5 10.25 Mile s L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucy¬«101 ¬«7 ¬«212 ")140 ")53 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th S t reet Lyman Bou levard ChanhassenRoadCros st own B oulevard Pleas a nt Vi e wRo ad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n e erTrailW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m Bo uleva r d PowersBoulevardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCoun ty Road 14 0 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Bou levard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail 82nd Street West Mar k e t BoulevardFlyin g Cloud D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLake Drive Pioneer Trail East Hig h w ay 101ChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreetLEGEND ""Overpass ##Trail Head !!Un derpass Existing , Sidewalk Future, Sid ewalk Existing , Trai l Future, Trail Op en Space Commu nity Park Neighborhoo d Park Pre se rve Special Use No n-City Parks & Open Space Publi c School Water Bodies Muni cipal Boun daries Surround ing Mu nicipal Trails Surround ing Mu nicipal Parks Existing Region al Trai ls Regional Trail Sea rc h Corridor Regional Trail - 20 40 System Additio n 2030 Planned Land Use Medium/Hig h Density Residential Low De nsity Residen tial Large L ot Re si den tial °0 0.5 10.25 Mile s Figure 5-1. Regional Search Corridors 5-42 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 DesiGn oF trails anD siDeWalks BetWeen neiGHBorHooDs Policy 1.2 and Goal 2 outline various ways to keep the park system connected with trails and sidewalks. Today the city of Chanhassen has many trails and sidewalks that allow pedestrians and bicyclists to move safely between parks, schools, commercial areas, and neighborhoods. As new neighborhoods are developed or changed, thought should be given to maintaining strong trail connections, as well as adding and improving the connections between parks and neighborhoods, making convenient connections, and creating safe road crossings where needed. Tunnels, like the Hwy 5 underpass shown below, allow continuity and safety in movement for bikers and walkers, young and old. Mid- block crossings using HAWK signals can be useful in areas where trails can only be on one side of a street or a trail crossing needs to be in a certain area. Stairs and switchbacks can be used in places where trail connections are needed in steep areas. VacateD/aBanDoneD riGHt-oF-Way As a community evolves there are occasions when existing right-of-way is determined to be no longer needed, is abandoned, or is requested to be vacated by adjacent property owners. Where possible given dedication conditions or restrictions, consideration should be given to whether these rights- of-way could be used for trail, open space corridor, or park purposes. Goal 2. Develop and maintain a comprehensive and easily navigable trail and sidewalk system that connects neighborhoods to park and recreation facilities, schools, community destinations, and other communities. 2.1. Prioritize the elimination of trail gaps based on safety, connectivity, and cost. 2.2. Create trails within preserves. 2.3. Improve the trail user experience through improved maintenance, wayfinding, and amenities (i.e. benches, trash cans, etc.). 2.4. Establish trails and sidewalks as a key transportation network in new development. 2.5. Explore opportunities to expand the trail and sidewalk system through neighborhoods to enhance connections to surrounding amenities. 2.6. Prioritize the construction of grade-separated crossings of roads for trails based on safety, demand, and standard transportation warrants like traffic volumes. 2.7. Preserve vacated or abandoned right-of-way for trail purposes. 2.8. Collaborate with local and regional agencies on the establishment of regional trails. 2.9. Partner with surrounding communities to create inter-community trail connections that enables users to travel to surrounding communities and regional trails without having to ‘jump’ between different trails and sidewalks. Hwy 5 trail underpass Planned neighborhood trail connectionEnhanced trail crossing Existing park trail 5-43 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 Goal 3. Ensure all residents have the opportunity to participate in recreation, education, culture, and arts activities. 3.1. Strive to offer a diversity of programs at a variety of times to serve all age groups. 3.2. Explore art, culture, and nature based programming and partnerships to serve non-athletic community needs. 3.3. Draw residents to parks and recreation facilities by hosting City events and supporting partners’ events. 3.4. Encourage, partner with, and support existing associations, clubs, and groups to fill programming gaps that the City cannot fill. 3.5. Expand partnerships with local schools to serve community needs. Goal 4. Be a leader in environmental sustainability. 4.1. Preserve remaining natural areas as opportunities arise. 4.2. Support park users’ efforts to improve the quality of their environment by offering recycling, composting, etc. 4.3. Manage the use of pesticides within parks. 4.4. Explore opportunities to convert existing turf areas to native plantings. 4.5. Reduce impacts on lakes, waterways, and groundwater by incorporating stormwater best practices in park and facility design. 4.6. Use sustainable building practices when developing, expanding or renovating facilities. 4.7. Improve energy efficiency when renovating or constructing new facilities. 4.8. Use native trees/shrubs planted in appropriate locations to shade and shield buildings and facilities to conserve energy. 4.9. Raise public awareness of the the benefits and necesity of natural resources, the importance of sustainability, and the City’s efforts through social media, interpretation, and educational programming. need more variety and interesting stuff to do for all ages. WHat We HearD i would like to see a more natural approach to grounds, grass and trail maintenance. less mowing of natural areas and zero herbicide/pesticide use. WHat We HearD 5-44 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 PesticiDes, Parks, anD PeoPle Lawn space in the public realm has many benefits; it provides a more aesthetically pleasing and softer surface for play and leisure when compared to hard-packed dirt, it stabilizes dust, absorbs rather than reflects sunlight, and absorbs carbon dioxide. While these are beneficial, lawns are still monocultures that support fewer species insects, birds, mammals and other organisms that work together to foster an ecosystem that provides clean air, soil, and water. In addition, the chemicals and energy required to maintain a turfgrass lawn are high. Over the last 20 years the City of Chanhassen has minimized its use of pesticides, generally only using them for the specific issues like Emerald Ash Borer. Several adjustments to current practices can result in lower rates of pesticide applications (including herbicides, insecticides, fungicides, and other substances meant for destroying pests), reduced labor and energy inputs, reduced human exposure to carcinogens, and increased habitat. Strategies include: »Integrated Pest Management, or IPM, addresses pests such as weeds or insects by utilizing a combination of biological controls, maintenance practices, increased tolerance of smaller infestations, and pesticides when needed. »Education about the benefits of more sustainable alternatives and appreciating a more natural appearance of parks. »Development of low-impact lawns that include the use of fescue grasses, buffalo grass, and other broadleaf, meadow-like components, which require less water and fertilizer than bluegrass. »Conversion of underutilized turfgrass areas into native tall grass meadows. »Pesticide-free Maintenance Practices such as crack sealing, mowing, propane weed burning, hand weeding, tillage, and mulching. »Designing for reduced pesticide use includes utilizing low maintenance, spreading groundcovers and shrubs in landscape beds, mulch in tree wells, and fewer fence lines. »Modeling existing Pesticide Free Parks Programs such as those of Eugene and Portland, Oregon, and Seattle, Washington. Educational signage Educational signage Low-maintenance landscaping Pesticide free park Low-impact fescue grass lawn Native prairie plantings 5-45 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 artist DesiGneD Parks anD Park amenities Artistic features can take many forms and range from subtle to spectacular. Art can be incorporated into parks as a mural on a wall, a unique water fountain, an interpretive sign, a play feature, lights, or a bench. Artist designed amenities entice a park user to notice and think about how park facilities and amenities are designed and used and to identify parks and playgrounds with special artistic features. People think, “This is different and cool” or “That’s the park with the big dragonfly.” Policies 3.2 and 5.2 - 5.4 discuss the inclusion of art and artists in park design. Methods to implement these policies could include the following: »Devoting a portion of new construction projects to public art. See Norman, Oklahoma’s ‘Norman Forward’ for an example. »Using the CPTED Guidelines (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design). »Involving an ‘interpretive planner’ in the design of natural and educational experiences (e.g. ‘Preserve trail’ enhancement with wayfinding and nature observation) »Including an artist in the early phases of park development and design to explore creative ways to incorporate art into the design. »Designing exterior environments to be flexible for public use in a variety of ways (artistic, educational, cultural, performance, etc.). Musical play featuresNature themed shelter posts and fence Dragonfly play structure Artistic sidewalk markings Artistic bench 5-46 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Goal 5. Proactively plan for a high quality, efficient parks and recreation system that meets community needs. 5.1. Encourage parks to be defining features of neighborhoods through the placement of parks in a visible location and the establishment of connecting trails and sidewalks. 5.2. Encourage participation by neighborhoods, community groups, and local artists in the planning for and development of park and recreation facilities. Identify locations for unique features or improvements to avoid a system of “cookie cutter” parks. 5.3. Enhance users’ experiences through well-designed exterior environments/places that give consideration to how all members of the public can engage in these spaces in different ways (educational, cultural, performance, artistic, etc.), how places can be interconnected throughout the community, and how lighting contributes to inviting spaces. As part of design process, seek opportunities to use artist- created park features rather than standard catalog pieces. 5.4. Encourage the use of the park system for performance art, temporary art installations, and public art. 5.5. Explore opportunities to reconfigure or improve efficiencies within existing parks to serve identified community needs. 5.6. Continue strong partnership and communication with local associations, clubs, and other organizations to ensure facilities are meeting their needs. 5.7. Integrate trails into the planning and design process for public improvements and land development. 5.8. Design parks and facilities to address active and passive needs while giving consideration to the environmental context, surrounding land uses, and future maintenance and operational needs. 5.9. Establish and routinely update a sustainable operations, maintenance and replacement schedule for all parks and facilities with particular attention on playgrounds, basketball courts, tennis courts, pickleball courts, shelters, etc. 5.10. Collaborate with Engineering Department on trail pavement management program. 5.11. Explore partnership opportunities for capital improvement costs and life-cycle system costs. 5.12. Maintain current management of fields as demand continues to increase: 5.12.1. Rotational resting of fields based on a schedule/level of use. 5.12.2. Postponement of use during and after significant rain events. 5.13. Expand the capacity of the athletic facilities through improvements and efficiencies within existing community parks. Facilities to celebrate the arts should be included. Bandstands, public art and sculpture. WHat We HearD Performance art in parks eFFicient Park & recreation systems Efficient parks and recreations system are those that successfully meet the needs of residents and visitors with minimum wasted effort or expense. An example might be that neighborhood parks are located in a manner that optimizes walkability for residents while minimizing service area overlap. trail DeVeloPment PartnersHiPs The development and maintenance of trails involves collaboration between the Parks and Recreation, Engineering, and Public Works Departments. In addition to design and construction, the Parks Department plows the trails. Pavement management (crack sealing and pavement replacement) for trails, however, is overseen by the Engineering and Public Works Departments in coordination with street construction projects. These departments are also responsible for making improvements for at-grade trail crossings. As this plan’s community engagement process highlighted the importance of improving safety at trail crossings, collaboration between these departments will be important for the implementation of the system plan. 5-47 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 city PartnersHiPs Partnerships are vital to the development and operations of the parks and recreation system. Individuals, businesses, civic organizations, nonprofits, and institutions provide valuable time, money, and space to support a variety of initiatives from educational sessions to park clean-up to helping at community events. Developing and maintaining partnerships will continue to be important as the system plan is implemented. Current city partners include: »3rd Lair Skate Park »AARP »AmericInn »Athletics & Extracurricular Activities »Augustana Emerald Crest »Baha’i’ Faith »Berne Scale »Better Business Bureau »Beyond the Yellow Ribbon »Boy Scout Troup #330 »Buy Chanhassen »Carver County »Chanhassen American Legion »Chanhassen Fire Department »Chanhassen Floral »Chanhassen Interact Club »Chanhassen Library »Chanhassen Lion’s Club »Chanhassen Villager »Chapel Hill »Charter Bank Chanhassen »Chaska Park & Recreation »Dugout Club/CAA »Eastern Carver County Schools (ISD 112) »Eden Prairie Senior Center »Edward Jones »Hazeltine National Golf Club »KleinBank »Living Christ Lutheran Church »MAAA (MN Area on Aging) »Minnesota Timberwolves »Minnesota Twins »Minnetonka Public Schools (ISD 276) »MN Postcard Club »New Horizons Academy »Park Dental »Pickleball Association of MN »Pinky Swear Kids Triathlon »Purple Box Jewelers »REACH for Resources »Ridgeview Clinics »Ridgeview Medical Center »Rotary Club of Chanhassen »Scouting Groups »Senior Advisory Bouard Member »Sentence to Serve (adults) »Skyhawks »SmartLink »SouthWest Christian High School »SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce »SouthWest Metro Pickleball Club »Southwest Publishing »Southwest Transit »Sports Unlimited »Summerwood of Chanhassen »The Mustard Seed Landscape & Garden Center »Twin City Paddle Boards »University of Minnesota »Walgreen’s Chanhassen »Work Experience Program Goal 6. Implement strategies to increase the City’s capacity to maintain and expand the parks and recreation system. 6.1. Identify and expand partnerships with area recreation associations, clubs and groups; local businesses; private organizations; neighborhood groups; and other public agencies. 6.2. Utilize our facilities to capitalize on opportunities to generate revenue. 6.3. Evaluate options to expand the use of volunteers to support park operations and programming. 6.4. Explore seeking voter approval to issue bonds or levy a tax to expand or support the needs of the park and recreation facilities and system. 6.5. Encourage property owners interested in donating or granting conservation easements on their land. 6.6. Support the creation of a non-profit parks and recreation foundation. our hope is that long term the park areas continue to be protected. Having those areas is a huge plus for living in chanhassen. WHat We HearD 5-48 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 keep [area north and west of lake ann] free of developers. natural setting of lake ann is wonderful! WHat We HearD Initiatives Initiatives are specific actions that are recommended for implementation. Initiatives are organized by the topic areas of parks, facilities, trails, preserves, programming, and operations. In this area in particular, care will be needed to determine what level of detail the system plan should include. For example, the neighborhood park section could become a list of all the specific improvements in each park or it could summarize an approach. Our recommendation is to use the latter method. This would mean that we might have a recommendation that identifies the need to replace and upgrade playgrounds in neighborhood parks according to the maintenance and replacement schedule rather than a list of each park where replacement is prioritized. 1. Parks Chanhassen’s 30 community and neighborhood parks play an important role in the City’s quality of life. They act as places for community gatherings, picnics and celebrations, family outings, and group and individual recreation. The following park initiatives aim to provide guidance to ensure each park continues to fulfill its role in the overall system. 1.1. Maintain Lake Ann Park as the premier community park. 1.1.1. Develop a master plan that defines the extent of park expansion to the west and north to preserve natural areas, extend the trail around the lake, and provide for additional recreational amenities like an amphitheater. The master plan should also explore additional facilities appropriate for a community park with significant natural amenities, parking expansion, circulation needs, and expanded natural surface and paved trails. The master plan should seek to influence adjacent neighborhood design to promote the extension of park and open space fingers into the adjacent development areas. The master plan should also include a natural resources section to guide the stewardship of the park’s natural resources. 1.1.2. Add user amenities in a phased manner, including permanent restrooms near the pavilions and athletic facilities, benches, and electronic scoreboards. 1.2. Implement the recommendations of the Bandimere Park Master Plan, which includes a picnic shelter with restrooms, field lights, sport court, hockey warming house, and possible splash pad. 1.3. At Lake Susan Park renovate the existing picnic shelter to include permanent restrooms, expand parking and add lighting and structured seating for the baseball field. 1.4. Add permanent restrooms and hockey warming house to City Center Park. 1.5. Seek opportunities to expand the capacity of the community park network to serve athletic and community event needs. 1.6. Use maintenance and replacement schedule to plan for phased replacement of neighborhood park facilities (i.e. playgrounds, sport courts, shelters, etc.). 1.7. Add parks and/or preserves as development occurs in the Bluff Creek Golf Course, Bluff Creek Corridor, and County Road 61 Corridor Plan areas. HOCKEY RINK W/ WARMING HOUSE SPLASHPAD, SHELTER/CONCESSION, PLAYGROUND RENOVATION LIGHTED SOCCER FIELDS LIGHTED PARKING TENNIS COURTS LIGHTED SOCCER FIELD LIGHTED BALLFIELDS LIGHTED PARKING Amphitheater Bandimere Park Master Plan 5-49 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 Park DeVeloPment Traditionally, small towns and cities have been organized around a town green, parks, and open spaces. These green spaces and activity areas give life, energy, and character to their surrounding communities. In many ways, they define the places where we live. Therefore, the development of parks and open spaces should be carefully considered and not be relegated to leftover spaces in our communities. Rather, they should play a central role in the organization of our neighborhoods, communities and cities. The criteria for park development should consider the following: neighborhood Parks Neighborhood parks are the basic unit of the park system. They serve the recreational and social focus of the adjoining neighborhoods and contribute to a distinct neighborhood identity. Neighborhood parks should serve as extensions of the neighborhood around them, providing recreational and social activities. Development Design Criteria: »Prioritize locating the neighborhood park on local or major local streets. »Incorporate barriers with landscaping, fencing or walls when the park is adjacent to arterial roadways. »Provide adequate connections by linking the park to adjacent developments with trails and sidewalks. »Design the park for both active and passive uses and consider the specific needs of the neighborhood, all age groups, and all physical abilities. »Utilize the park to create a “sense of place” that reflects and enhances neighborhood identity. »Use public art, preservation of natural areas, and other park design to distinguish parks from one another. »Incorporate natural features on the site, such as topography, vegetation and hydrology. »Maximize the number of residences fronting the park. »Include widened on-street parking area adjacent to the park. »Encourage the use of traffic calming devices next to the park. community Parks Community parks are designed to be accessible by multiple neighborhoods and should focus on meeting community-based recreational needs and on preserving unique landscapes and open spaces. Community parks are generally larger in scale than neighborhood parks, but smaller than regional parks and are designed for residents who live within a 2 to 3-mile radius. While community parks may also meet the needs of neighborhoods, they primarily function as “destination” parks with special facilities such as lighted sports fields, amphitheaters, etc. that serve the entire community. Development Design Criteria: »Locate community park on a collector or higher order roadway. »Provide a barrier with landscaping, fencing or walls if located near an arterial roadway. »Encourage trail connections to other parks. »Position park with streets on all sides or on three sides with a school, municipal feature or significant natural feature on the fourth side. »Dedicate 65% of park space to active uses and 35% to passive uses. »Provide sufficient parking to support park amenities, but avoid occupying more than 10% of the site. »Include widened on-street parking area adjacent to the park. »Encourage the use of traffic calming devices next to the park. 5-50 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Lake Ann P ark Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park City Center Park Chanhassen Recreation Cent er South Lotus Lake Par k Kerber P ond Park Pow er Hill Pa rk Riley Ridge P ark North Lot us La ke P ark Meadow Green Pa rk Herman Field Park Pheas ant Hill Park Sunset R idge Park Stone C reek Park Pione er Pass Park Roundhouse Park Curry Fa rm s Park Chanhass en Hills Park Carv er Bea ch Park Cathc art P ark (O wne d by t he City of Shore wood) Sugarbush Park Prairie Knoll Park Ric e Marsh La ke Park Bandimere Height s Park Greenwood Shores P ark Carv er Bea ch Playground Minnewas ht a Heights Park Chanhass en Estate s Pa rk Chanhass en High School (J oint Fa cilities) Manchest er Park (To Be Com plete d in 2018) Mi n ne w a s h t a R e gi on a l P a r k U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ot a La n d s c a p e A r bo r e tu m R a gu e t W ild l if e Ma na g e m e n t A r e a Pr iv a t e l y O wn e d P u bl ic G o lf C o u r s e MN Va l le y N a t i o na l Wi ld li f e R ef ug e Ols on C ommunit y Garden Minnet onka Middle School W est CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th S t reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCros st ow n B oulevard Pleas ant Vi e wRo ad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n e erT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arb oretu m B o ule va r d Powe r s Boul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPion ee r Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEG END Op en Space Comm unity Park Neigh borho od Park Preserve Special Us e No n-City Pa rks & Open Sp ace Publi c Sch ool Surround ing M unic ipa l Parks Wa ter Bod ies Muni cip al Bou nda ries °0 0.5 10.25 Mil es »Develop a master plan to: »Define the limits of park expansion to the north and west »Preserve natural areas »Complete a loop trail around Lake Ann »Identify new facility and user amenities Lake ann Park »Expanded parking »Add permanent restroom facility »Lighting and structured seating for the baseball field Lake SuSan Park Add a permanent restroom facility & hockey warming house City Center Park »Implement existing master plan »Construct picnic shelter with restrooms »Add field lights »Build sport court »Add a splash pad »Add a hockey warming house Bandimere Park »Seek opportunities to expand the capacity of the community park network to serve athletic and community event needs. »Use maintenance and replacement schedule to plan for phased replacement of neighborhood park facilities (i.e. playgrounds, sport courts, shelters, etc.) City-wide initiativeS Add parks and/or preserves as development occurs in the Bluff Creek Golf Course, Bluff Creek Corridor, and County Road 61 Corridor Plan areas South ChanhaSSen Priority Expansion Area Figure 5-2. Park Initiatives 5-51 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 2. Facilities There are a wide range of facilities currently provided in the Chanhassen Parks and Recreation System. From traditional diamond fields to a Senior Center, the City meets many of the needs of its various types of users. The facility initiatives aim to build on the existing system to better accommodate current users while potentially attracting new ones. 2.1. Identify and construct a year-round signature recreation facility in the community that includes indoor, outdoor, and passive spaces. 2.1.1. Complete an aquatic facilities need study. 2.1.2. Complete a facilities study for the Recreation Center to plan for the renovation and expansion of facilities and services. 2.1.3. Complete a facilities study for the Senior Center to plan for the renovation and expansion of facilities and services. 2.2. Add a destination splash pad at a community park. Ensure expansion includes additional parking if needed and user amenities like benches, restrooms, and changing facilities. 2.3. Develop and implement a phased improvement plan for improvements to the skate park. 2.4. Support pickleball by adding user amenities like seating, wind screens, and sun canopies. 2.5. Add permanent concrete tee boxes and improved site amenities to support users at the Bandimere disc golf course. 2.6. Improve existing volleyball facilities within community parks through improved seating, nets, and shelters. 2.7. Add community-scale nature play at a community park. 2.8. Add unstructured nature play throughout the community as appropriate. 2.9. Establish an interpretative center with an outdoor lab space and a nature based play area to support natural resources outreach and education. 2.10. Explore opportunities for a second community garden. 2.11. Complete an audit of system ADA accessibility and address issues identified. Prioritize an examination of accessibility at the Recreation Center and Senior Center to address concerns regarding handicapped parking, door access, and trip hazards. 2.12. Pilot facilities for new or trending sports to assess appropriateness for park system, cost, durability, and demand. Destination Splash Pad Interpretive Center Outdoor Lab Space adding community nature play as part an expansion of lake ann Park would enhance this park as an area destination, setting it apart from surrounding communities. WHat We HearD 5-52 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 natUre Play Nature play evokes a range of images in people’s heads from total immersion in a natural environment to playground structures that are man-made to look like natural elements. The idea behind nature play is to get kids in touch with their natural environment. These playgrounds are different from standard playgrounds in that they encourage children to get dirty, imagine, create, and learn with nature. Natural play areas are designed to incorporate natural elements, such as wood, stone, water, plants, soil, and sand, that facilitate kids’ interactions with them in a playful manner. Children can see how natural materials interact with each other and themselves, as well as observe insects and other wildlife in their natural habitats. Simply allowing and directing kids to experience their natural environments in a playful way, rather than being fearful of the outdoors, promotes confidence, independence, and ecological and environmental stewardship. Natural play using existing natural structures Destination nature playground Stone, water, sand, and plants in play area Wood and downed trees as play features Low-impact nature playground structures 5-53 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center rather than the park system as a whole. RECREATION CENTER 20% neve r 5 % every day 24 % o nc e a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Rec Center 13% are unaware of ituse private recreation facilities 18% are not interested in what it has to offer 35% use a recreation center in another community 18% Other Popular Responses: Youth Sports 0% 50% 39% 35% attended anevent 27% utilized thetness center 22% attendedopen gymopenpickleball participated ina class 26% 16% 9% hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party Existing Facility & Programming Usage “I hope it can expand, perhaps by moving to a new building and leaving the full building for an expansion of Bluff Creek.” “It is a very nice facility. I exercise there 3 days a week. The staff is friendly and helpful.” “The rec center needs to ll the needs of all community members. Currently, I feel the programming has a focus on children and families...” “We would LOVE to go if you had swimming lessons in an indoor pool, and much more creative classes to choose from (art, clay, music, theater....)” “More pickleball courts. As this sport grows, so should the number of courts.” “An indoor public pool and walking track like Chaska Comm. Center....the private clubs are so costly!” “We need an economical alternative to the expensive and overly busy Lifetime Fitness. Doesn't need to be fancy but something more like a YMCA or the Chaska Community Center.” 50% 0%20%40%60%80%100% Of Respondents That Never Use the Recreation Center: Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming running/walking track85%15% kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms69%31% additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34% senior center56%44% "health" snack bar54%46% a seasonal domedmulti-purpose eld house39%61% more exercise/class studios28%72% larger tnesscenter20%80% indoor pool19%81% Select General Comments ImportantNot Important Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming 0%20%40%60% 50% 80%100% moreprogramming 73%27% tn ess classspace 73%27% large meeting/event room 70%30% indoor pool 39%61% tn essequipment 39%61% kitchen facility 40%60% indoor track 44%56% garden 64%36% hot tub 26%74% sport court 76%24% theater 56%44% café or coffeeshop 44%56% Important Not Important While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic. However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1% never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER Select General Comments 31% never 1 % e very day 33 % o nce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Senior Center 40% are unaware of itare not interested in what it has to offer 24% use a senior center in another community 12% Of Respondents That Never Use the Senior Center: Other Popular Responses: Women’s Club Driver’s Safety Class Chan-O-Laires 0% 60% 51% 42% eld trip 29% health orwellness program 4%woodcarving art or educationclass 27%card playing Existing Facility & Programming Usage 100%0%20%40%60%80% Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive Support For Senior Center Alternatives build a new senior center adjacent to the recreation center 35%40%25% maintain the existing senior center as it is 43%37%20% relocate the senior center to a new, larger facility 37%48%15% “I am proud of what the existing Senior Center offers in relation to programming but we will be out growing the facility with the shift in retirees. And we do have a dynamic and hard-working director in Sue!!” “From what I've seen, there isn't much offered for Senior Citizens that still work full-time. I would like to see some programs offered evenings or weekends.” “As the population ages Chanhassen needs a viable senior center. The one we have is very small and does not have enough programs. A theater and art space are very important to me.” “Please keep the bus trips so we can get to places we can't drive to and that have limited parking.” “The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you are considering a new community center please include the senior's space: Chaska's community center where all ages and all activities can participate is the ultimate (even church studies, meetings, etc.)” This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center rather than the park system as a whole. RECREATION CENTER 20% neve r 5 % every day 24 % o n c e a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Rec Center 13% are unaware of ituse private recreation facilities 18% are not interested in what it has to offer 35% use a recreation center in another community 18% Other Popular Responses: Youth Sports 0% 50% 39% 35% attended anevent 27% utilized thetness center 22% attendedopen gymopenpickleball participated ina class 26% 16% 9% hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party Existing Facility & Programming Usage “I hope it can expand, perhaps by moving to a new building and leaving the full building for an expansion of Bluff Creek.” “It is a very nice facility. I exercise there 3 days a week. The staff is friendly and helpful.” “The rec center needs to ll the needs of all community members. Currently, I feel the programming has a focus on children and families...” “We would LOVE to go if you had swimming lessons in an indoor pool, and much more creative classes to choose from (art, clay, music, theater....)” “More pickleball courts. As this sport grows, so should the number of courts.” “An indoor public pool and walking track like Chaska Comm. Center....the private clubs are so costly!” “We need an economical alternative to the expensive and overly busy Lifetime Fitness. Doesn't need to be fancy but something more like a YMCA or the Chaska Community Center.” 50% 0%20%40%60%80%100% Of Respondents That Never Use the Recreation Center: Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming running/walking track 85%15% kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms 69%31% additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34% senior center 56%44% "health" snack bar 54%46% a seasonal domedmulti-purpose e ld house 39%61% more exercise/class studios 28%72% larger tn essc enter 20%80% indoor pool 19%81% Select General Comments Important Not Important Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming 0%20%40%60% 50% 80%100% moreprogramming 73%27% tn ess classspace 73%27% large meeting/event room 70%30% indoor pool 39%61% tn essequipment 39%61% kitchen facility 40%60% indoor track 44%56% garden 64%36% hot tub 26%74% sport court 76%24% theater 56%44% café or coffeeshop 44%56% Important Not Important While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic. However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1% never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER Select General Comments 31% never 1 % e very day 33 % o n ce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Senior Center 40% are unaware of it are not interested in what it has to offer 24% use a senior center in another community 12% Of Respondents That Never Use the Senior Center: Other Popular Responses: Women’s Club Driver’s Safety Class Chan-O-Laires 0% 60% 51% 42% eld trip 29% health orwellness program 4%woodcarving art or educationclass 27%card playing Existing Facility & Programming Usage 100%0%20%40%60%80% Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive Support For Senior Center Alternatives build a new senior center adjacent to the recreation center 35%40%25% maintain the existing senior center as it is 43%37%20% relocate the senior center to a new, larger facility 37%48%15% “I am proud of what the existing Senior Center offers in relation to programming but we will be out growing the facility with the shift in retirees. And we do have a dynamic and hard-working director in Sue!!” “From what I've seen, there isn't much offered for Senior Citizens that still work full-time. I would like to see some programs offered evenings or weekends.” “As the population ages Chanhassen needs a viable senior center. The one we have is very small and does not have enough programs. A theater and art space are very important to me.” “Please keep the bus trips so we can get to places we can't drive to and that have limited parking.” “The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you are considering a new community center please include the senior's space: Chaska's community center where all ages and all activities can participate is the ultimate (even church studies, meetings, etc.)” This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center rather than the park system as a whole. RECREATION CENTER 20% neve r 5 % every day 24 % o nc e a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Rec Center 13% are unaware of ituse private recreation facilities 18% are not interested in what it has to offer 35% use a recreation center in another community 18% Other Popular Responses: Youth Sports 0% 50% 39% 35% attended anevent 27% utilized thetness center 22% attendedopen gymopenpickleball participated ina class 26% 16% 9% hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party Existing Facility & Programming Usage “I hope it can expand, perhaps by moving to a new building and leaving the full building for an expansion of Bluff Creek.” “It is a very nice facility. I exercise there 3 days a week. The staff is friendly and helpful.” “The rec center needs to ll the needs of all community members. Currently, I feel the programming has a focus on children and families...” “We would LOVE to go if you had swimming lessons in an indoor pool, and much more creative classes to choose from (art, clay, music, theater....)” “More pickleball courts. As this sport grows, so should the number of courts.” “An indoor public pool and walking track like Chaska Comm. Center....the private clubs are so costly!” “We need an economical alternative to the expensive and overly busy Lifetime Fitness. Doesn't need to be fancy but something more like a YMCA or the Chaska Community Center.” 50% 0%20%40%60%80%100% Of Respondents That Never Use the Recreation Center: Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming running/walking track 85%15% kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms 69%31% additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34% senior center 56%44% "health" snack bar 54%46% a seasonal domedmulti-purpose e ld house 39%61% more exercise/class studios 28%72% larger tn essc enter 20%80% indoor pool 19%81% Select General Comments Important Not Important Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming 0%20%40%60% 50% 80%100% moreprogramming 73%27% tn ess classspace 73%27% large meeting/event room 70%30% indoor pool 39%61% tn essequipment 39%61% kitchen facility 40%60% indoor track 44%56% garden 64%36% hot tub 26%74% sport court 76%24% theater 56%44% café or coffeeshop 44%56% Important Not Important While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic. However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1 % never 34% ev e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER Select General Comments 31% never 1 % every day 33 % o n ce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Senior Center 40% are unaware of it are not interested in what it has to offer 24% use a senior center inanother community 12% Of Respondents That Never Use the Senior Center: Other Popular Responses: Women’s Club Driver’s Safety Class Chan-O-Laires 0% 60% 51% 42% eld trip 29% health orwellness program 4%woodcarving art or educationclass 27%card playing Existing Facility & Programming Usage 100%0%20%40%60%80% Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive Support For Senior Center Alternatives build a new senior center adjacent to the recreation center 35%40%25% maintain the existing senior center as it is 43%37%20% relocate the senior center to a new, larger facility 37%48%15% “I am proud of what the existing Senior Center offers in relation to programming but we will be out growing the facility with the shift in retirees. And we do have a dynamic and hard-working director in Sue!!” “From what I've seen, there isn't much offered for Senior Citizens that still work full-time. I would like to see some programs offered evenings or weekends.” “As the population ages Chanhassen needs a viable senior center. The one we have is very small and does not have enough programs. A theater and art space are very important to me.” “Please keep the bus trips so we can get to places we can't drive to and that have limited parking.” “The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you are considering a new community center please include the senior's space: Chaska's community center where all ages and all activities can participate is the ultimate (even church studies, meetings, etc.)” recreation center senior center existing Facilities & Programming Use siGnatUre recreation Facility stUDy Community input in the Parks and Recreation System planning process identified the need for improvements to the Recreation Center and Senior Center. A recommended initiative of the System Plan is the development of a facility study for a Signature Recreation Facility. Completing a facility study is important as it will provide: »A thorough assessment of existing conditions - including an inventory of existing facilities, analysis of service levels, and an assessment of other public and private resources serving the community »The identification of community needs now and into the future - including community preferences for potential amenities and services »The exploration of a range of options with an analysis of costs, benefits, and challenges of each »An assessment of construction, operation, and maintenance costs, as well as the potential economic impact of the facility »The exploration of partnership and funding options While a detailed examination of the recreation and senior centers was not conducted in the system planning process, outreach as part of the system planning process did invite discussion on the future needs of the community relative to those facilities. The charts provided on the next page are summaries of some of the community input received. These provide a foundation for a specific facility study to be conducted. All of the community input received during the system planning process is available in Appendix A of the system plan. Through the system planning process, the following amenities and services were identified as needs that have the potential to be served by a signature recreation facility: »Childcare »Coffee shop/snack bar »Community meeting space/banquet space with kitchen »Expanded classes and programming »Field House/Dome »Fitness Center »Garden »Gym space »Ice rinks (indoor/outdoor) »Indoor kids play area »Passive recreation areas »Pool (indoor/outdoor) »Running/walking track »Splash pad »Sport courts »Studio for art/hobbies »Swim lessons/open swim »Theater »Waterpark 5-54 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming 0%20%40%60% 50% 80%100% moreprogramming 73%27% tn ess classspace 73%27% large meeting/event room 70%30% indoor pool 39%61% tn essequipment 39%61% kitchen facility 40%60% indoor track 44%56% garden 64%36% hot tub 26%74% sport court 76%24% theater 56%44% café or coffeeshop 44%56% Important Not Important While all responses to the Senior Center survey were evaluated, only those from respondents over the age of 60 were considered for the charts included in this infographic. However, the comments included below are representative of all participating age groups. 1% never 34% e v e r y d ay 48% once a week 10% once a monthSENIOR CENTER Select General Comments 31% never 1 % every day 33 % o nce a week 11% once a month 24% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Senior Center 40% are unaware of it are not interested in whatit has to offer 24% use a senior center inanother community 12% Of Respondents That Never Use the Senior Center: Other Popular Responses: Women’s Club Driver’s Safety Class Chan-O-Laires 0% 60% 51% 42% eld trip 29% health orwellness program 4%woodcarving art or educationclass 27%card playing Existing Facility & Programming Usage 100%0%20%40%60%80% Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not at All Supportive Support For Senior Center Alternatives build a new senior center adjacent to the recreation center 35%40%25% maintain the existing senior center as it is 43%37%20% relocate the senior center to a new, larger facility 37%48%15% “I am proud of what the existing Senior Center offers in relation to programming but we will be out growing the facility with the shift in retirees. And we do have a dynamic and hard-working director in Sue!!” “From what I've seen, there isn't much offered for Senior Citizens that still work full-time. I would like to see some programs offered evenings or weekends.” “As the population ages Chanhassen needs a viable senior center. The one we have is very small and does not have enough programs. A theater and art space are very important to me.” “Please keep the bus trips so we can get to places we can't drive to and that have limited parking.” “The location of the Chanhassen Sr. Center appears to be superb! It is easy to locate, access for pleasure and emergencies if needed. If you are considering a new community center please include the senior's space: Chaska's community center where all ages and all activities can participate is the ultimate (even church studies, meetings, etc.)” This survey was geared toward people who utilize the Recreation Center’s facilities and programming, regardless of whether or not they are a resident of Chanhassen. All of the questions specifically pertain to the Recreation Center rather than the park system as a whole. RECREATION CENTER 20% never 5 % every day 24 % o nc e a week 9% once a month 42% few times a yearHow Often Respondents Utilize the Rec Center 13% are unaware of ituse private recreation facilities 18% are not interested in what it has to offer 35% use a recreation center in another community 18% Other Popular Responses: Youth Sports 0% 50% 39% 35% attended anevent 27% utilized thetness center 22% attendedopen gymopenpickleball participated ina class 26% 16% 9% hosted or attendeda meetinghosted or attendeda birthday party Existing Facility & Programming Usage “I hope it can expand, perhaps by moving to a new building and leaving the full building for an expansion of Bluff Creek.” “It is a very nice facility. I exercise there 3 days a week. The staff is friendly and helpful.” “The rec center needs to ll the needs of all community members. Currently, I feel the programming has a focus on children and families...” “We would LOVE to go if you had swimming lessons in an indoor pool, and much more creative classes to choose from (art, clay, music, theater....)” “More pickleball courts. As this sport grows, so should the number of courts.” “An indoor public pool and walking track like Chaska Comm. Center....the private clubs are so costly!” “We need an economical alternative to the expensive and overly busy Lifetime Fitness. Doesn't need to be fancy but something more like a YMCA or the Chaska Community Center.” 50% 0%20%40%60%80%100% Of Respondents That Never Use the Recreation Center: Importance of Additional Facilities & Programming running/walking track 85%15% kitchen facilities inmeeting rooms 69%31% additional technologyin meeting rooms (screen,projector, etc.)66%34% senior center 56%44% "health" snack bar 54%46% a seasonal domedmulti-purpose e ld house 39%61% more exercise/class studios 28%72% larger tn essc enter 20%80% indoor pool 19%81% Select General Comments Important Not Important importance of additional Facilities & Programming recreation center senior center 5-55 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 Lake Ann Park Lake Susan Park Bandimere Park Ci ty Center Park Chanhassen Recreation Cent er South Lotus Lake Park Kerber Pond Park Power Hill Pa rk Riley Ridge Park Nort h Lotus La ke Park Meadow Green Pa rk Herman Field Park Pheas ant Hill Park Sunset R idge Park Stone Creek Park Pione er Pass Park Roundhouse Park Curry Fa rm s Park Chanhass en Hills Park Carv er Bea ch Park Cat hc art P ark (O wne d by the City of Shore wood) Sugarbush Park Prairie Knoll Park Ric e Marsh La ke P ark Bandimere Height s Park Greenwood Shores P ark Carv er Bea ch Playground Minnewas ht a Height s Park Chanhass en Es tate s Pa rk Chanhass en High School (J oint Fa cilities) Manchester Park (To B e Com plete d in 2018) Mi n ne w a s h t a R e gi on a l P a r k U ni v e r s it y o f M in ne s ot a La n d s c a p e A r bo r e tu m R a gu e t W ild l if e Ma na g e m e n t A r e a Pr iv a t e l y O wn e d Pu bl ic G o lf C o u r s e MN V a l le y N a t i o na l W i ld li f e R e fug e Ols on Community Garden Minnet onka Middle School W est CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Driv e West 78th S t reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCros st o w n B oulevard Ple asant Vi e wRo ad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n eerT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m Bo ule va r d Power s Boul evardKerberBoulevardLak e Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEND Open Space Comm unity Park Ne igh borho od Park Pre se rve Special Use Non-City Parks & Open Sp ace Public Sch ool Surrounding M unicipa l Parks Wa ter Bod ies Municip al Bou nda ries °0 0.5 10.25 Mil es »Complete a study to plan for expansion of facility and services »Improve accessibility (i.e. handicapped parking, trip hazards, door access) reCreation Center »Complete a study to plan for expansion of facility and services »Improve accessibility (i.e. handicapped parking, trip hazards, door access) Senior Center Develop and implement a phased plan for improvements to the skate park Skate Park Add permanent concrete tee boxes and improved site amenities to support disc golf users Bandimere Park »Identify and construct a year-round signature recreation facility in the community that includes indoor, outdoor, and passive spaces. Complete an aquatic facilities need study, recreation center study, and senior center study. »Add a destination splash pad with parking and user amenities at a community park. »Support pickleball by adding user amenities like seating, wind screens, and sun canopies. »Improve existing volleyball facilities within community parks through improved seating, nets, and shelters. »Add community-scale nature play at a community park. »Add unstructured nature play throughout the community as appropriate. »Establish an interpretative center with an outdoor lab space and a nature based play area to support natural resources outreach and education. »Explore opportunities for a second community garden. »Complete an audit of system ADA accessibility and address issues identified. Prioritize Recreation and Senior Centers. »Pilot facilities for new or trending sports to assess appropriateness for park system, cost, durability, and demand. »Install additional ballfield safety fencing as needed. »Implement the recommendations of the Athletic Fields Study. City-wide initiativeS Figure 5-3. Facility Initiatives 5-56 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 maintaining current baseball/softball fields and possibly adding an additional complex/fields to accommodate youth baseball/softball practices/ games and to better showcase our community during hosted tournaments. WHat We HearD2.13. Install additional ballfield safety fencing as needed. 2.14. Implement the following recommendations of the Athletic Fields Study: 2.14.1. Based on current trends combined with projected demand, Chanhassen should plan for new multi-purpose field construction (1-3 fields) in the next 15 years. 2.14.2. Based on national standards and desires of the baseball community, the City should continue to emphasize flexibility in the ballfields with basepaths and moveable pitching rubbers or mounds to better meet the demands for 75’ and 90’ basepath ballfields. 2.14.3. Provide lights at Bandimere Park on baseball and soccer fields to expand capacity of fields and improve scheduling flexibility. 2.14.4. Provide a lighted, artificial turf multi-use field at Bandimere Park to expand capacity, ensure playability, provide a premier field, and protect and allow for more resting of grass fields. 5-57 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 3. Trails Trails bring the park and recreation system closer to every resident, offering recreational opportunities and transportation alternatives, particularly for those who cannot or chose not to drive including low income households, children, and the elderly. As the most popular amenity in Chanhassen, the City’s 80 miles of trails already excel at creating accessible connections between destinations and supporting a healthy and active population. These trail initiatives aim to support the system’s excellent reputation by addressing gaps and improving user experiences. While the Parks and Recreation Department manages Chanhassen’s trail system, it is important to recognize that the construction and maintenance of trails are a result of collaboration between Parks and Recreation, Engineering, and Public Works. 3.1. Address trail gaps identified in Figure 3-17. 3.2. Address trail crossing safety issues identified in Figure 3-17. 3.3. Increase awareness and expanded trail use through maps and trail wayfinding to help identify loops, distances, and destinations. 3.4. Support trail accessibility through the identification of easily accessible routes that do not have steep slopes, gaps, or challenging transitions. 3.5. Enhance user experiences and placemaking through the addition of user amenities that incorporate art and education (i.e. benches, lighting, garbage cans, kiosks/signage, etc.) 3.6. Complete the connection to the Minnesota River through the construction of a trail along Bluff Creek Drive or Great Plains Boulevard. 3.7. Expand the number of natural surface trails by mapping existing locations, identifying opportunities for expansion, including in preserves, and incorporating trail expansion in the Capital Improvement Plan. 3.8. Explore opportunities to add trailheads. 3.9. Work with partner agencies to reopen the Minnesota River Bluff LRT Regional Trail. 3.10. Initiate a single-track mountain bike trail study. trail markers anD WayFinDinG Identification of routes, such as trail loops or distances, can be addressed in ways that range from easily implementable and temporary, to embedded and permanent. Route markers should be context sensitive, reflecting the feel of the surroundings. mileage markers on trails, 5k/10k routes marked. Work with local schools (earth club) or Boy scouts to have the youth help plan routes, post routes/ mileage markers on website. WHat We HearD 5-58 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th S treet Lyman Bou levard ChanhassenRoadCross town B oulevard Pleas a nt Vi e wRo ad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n e erTrailW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arb oretu m B o ule var d Power sBoul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 14 0 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Bou levard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeAn n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r s h L a k e E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEN D ""Existing Overpa ss ##Existing Trail Head !!Existing Und erpa ss GIden tified Sa fety C rossing Concern Trail Gap Existing Sidewal k Existing Trail Op en Spa ce Commu nity Pa rk Neigh borhoo d Park Preserve Special Use No n-City Pa rks & Open Space Publi c Scho ol Existing Region al Trai ls Surround ing Mun ici pal Tra ils Surround ing Mun ici pal Parks Water Bodi es Muni cipal Boun daries °0 0.5 10.25 Mile s »Address trail gaps and trail crossing safety issues. »Increase awareness and expanded trail use through maps and trail wayfinding to help identify loops, distances, and destinations. »Support trail accessibility through the identification of easily accessible routes that do not have steep slopes, gaps, or challenging transitions. »Enhance user experiences through kiosks/signage at existing trailheads, benches, lighting, garbage cans, etc. »Expand the number of natural surface trails by mapping existing locations, identifying opportunities, and incorporating trail expansion in the Capital Improvement Plan. »Explore opportunities to add trailheads. »Initiate a single-track mountain bike trail study. City-wide initiativeS Complete the connection to the Minnesota River through the construction of a trail along Bluff Creek Drive or Great Plains Boulevard minneSota river Work with partner agencies to reopen the Minnesota River Bluff LRT Regional Trail Lrt regionaL traiL Figure 5-4. Trail Initiatives 5-59 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 Plea sa nt V iew Pres er v e Cha n has se n Na tu r e Pre ser ve Ri c e Ma rsh Lak e P rese r v e Bl u ff Cree k Pre ser ve Fo x W oo d s Pre ser ve He ss e Fa r m Pa r k Pre se r v e Lake S u san Pre ser ve Pin e Hu rs t Pres er v e Bl u ff Cr eek Pre ser ve No rt h La ke R ile y Pres er ve MN Rive r Bl u ff s Prese r v e Hi dd e n C re ek Me ad o ws Prese r v e La ke S us an Pres er v e Nort h Pine Hu rst at Lak e H arri so n Pres er ve Bl u ff Cr e ek Hea d wa ter s Prese r v e CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Driv e West 78th S t reet Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCros st o w n B oulevard Ple asant Vi e wRo ad GreatPlai n s Boulev a r dBa varia R o a dSmithtownRoad P i o n eerT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretu m Bo ule va r d Power s Boul evardKerberBoulevardLak e Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard H un d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPi oneer Trail 82nd Street West F ly in g C lo u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardL akeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r shLake E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEND Open Space Pre se rve Exis tin g S ide wa lk Exis tin g Trail Non-City Parks & Open Sp ace Public Sch ool Exis tin g Regio nal Tra ils Surrounding M unicipa l Trails Wa ter Bod ies Municip al Bou nda ries °0 0.5 10.25 Mil es Collaborate with other government agencies in the protection of Seminary Fen Seminary Fen Collaborate with other government agencies in the protection of the Minnesota River Valley mn river vaLLey »Expand awareness of preserves through marketing and wayfinding. »Encourage expansion of opportunities for increased interaction and exploration of nature (i.e. natural surface trails, interpretation, programming, signage, wayfinding, maps, etc.) »Identify and prioritize the protection of natural areas that provide corridors/linkages between parks, preserves, and other destinations. »Prioritize the development of natural resource management plans. City-wide initiativeS Continue to preserve sensitive lands within the Bluff Creek Corridor BLuFF Creek Corridor Figure 5-5. Preserve Initiatives 5-60 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 4. Preserves Natural areas have been highlighted as an important amenity for Chanhassen residents to connect to, interact with, and learn about conservation and wildlife. While the City contains ample natural resources and preservation areas, their existence is generally unknown. The following initiatives aim to expand accessibility and awareness of existing preserves, while protecting every current and future natural area. 4.1. Expand awareness of preserves through marketing and wayfinding. 4.2. Encourage expansion of opportunities for increased interaction and exploration of nature (i.e. natural surface trails, interpretation, programming, signage, wayfinding, maps, etc.) 4.3. Identify and prioritize the protection of natural areas that provide corridors/linkages between parks, preserves, and other destinations. 4.4. Prioritize the development of natural resource management plans. 4.5. Collaborate with other government agencies in the protection of the Seminary Fen and the Minnesota River Valley. 4.6. Continue to preserve sensitive lands within the Bluff Creek Corridor. 5. Programming Users engage in recreational programming for enjoyment, health, skill development, socialization, enrichment, entertainment, physical fitness, and relaxation. Chanhassen hosts several popular community events and successfully partners with local organizations and associations to provide other programming opportunities. Programming initiatives aim to maintain existing programs and events, while improving accessibility for all users and expanding awareness and outreach. 5.1. Continue to host at least five major community events in the city (currently there is Feb Fest, Easter Egg Hunt, 4th of July, Halloween, Tree Lighting). 5.2. Continue to partner with area business and organizations to provide summer concert series. 5.3. Continue to collaborate with schools and other organizations to provide public recreation activities in the parks. 5.4. Expand the number of informal, indoor and outdoor, seasonal recreation events. 5.5. Expand nature based events and programs. 5.6. Expand Senior Center awareness through rebranding and a marketing campaign. 5.7. Collaborate with high school youth leaders to organize quarterly teen activities (fun runs, music, arts) and pilot programs. 5.8. Collaborate with the Arts Consortium of Carver County to support the expansion of arts related programming in the City. 5.9. Establish an Event Management Plan to address the registration and notification process; cost recovery; and strategies to minimize general park user impacts associated with non-City sponsored events seeking to utilize Chanhassen’s parks or trails. 5.10. Annually evaluate that the City’s pricing structure reflects the benefits of the program or event to the community versus the individual. Greater variety of community events throughout year. Want to attract folks from region to more than 4th of July. WHat We HearD Fourth of July Carnival BlUFF creek corriDor The Bluff Creek Corridor is a small tributary of the Lower Minnesota River, and is a treasured natural amenity in the City of Chanhassen. A 2007 inventory of Bluff Creek indicated that stormwater runoff and groundwater seepage occurring as a result of urban development is resulting in excessive ravine erosion and sediment buildup within the stream. Bluff Creek is now within a zoning overlay district that prevents development within the primary zone of the corridor and limits development types in surrounding areas. While some of the corridor is already within park preserves (as seen in Figure 3-16), the City should capitalize on any future opportunities to expand this protection. 5-61 System PlanSEPTEMBER 2017 6. Operations As the City of Chanhassen is almost completely built out, there is limited land left for the development of new parks and open space. As a result, maintenance of the high-quality system is an essential component of meeting the needs of current and future users. The following initiatives for Chanhassen focus on improving operational efficiencies and capabilities, maintenance, sustainability, communications, and programming evaluation. 6.1. Ensure the System Plan is used as a basis for the annual budgeting and capital improvement planning process to evaluate and address the parks and recreation system needs, including staffing, program/event expansion, facility expansion, maintenance, and replacement. 6.2. Communicate benefits of parks and recreation system, including the impact of the preserves and races/tournaments on the business community. 6.3. Incorporate stormwater best practices, such as rain gardens, bio- swales, and permeable pavers, in park and facility design. 6.4. Reduce impervious surfaces and explore turf conversion to native plantings in the design of parks and facilities. 6.5. Preserve natural buffers and setbacks around wetlands, rivers, ponds, reservoirs, and lakes on appropriate public lands and parks. 6.6. Improve water conservation and energy efficiency of facilities when renovating or constructing new. 6.7. Annually assess trail maintenance policies for debris removal and winter plowing. Reevaluate and amend winter plowing plans based on factors like historical maintenance, commuting routes, safe routes to school, and resident requests. 6.8. Establish a formal process for program and event development and evaluation and trend analysis. 6.9. Create a tobacco use policy for the parks and recreation system. 6.10. Incorporate innovative sustainable design and maintenance practices to make Chanhassen a model and educational resource for residents and surrounding communities. Tobacco-free park signage Vegetative buffer surrounding Lake Susan no smokinG in all parks! Better yet, no toBacco! WHat We HearD 5-62 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Chapter 6IMPlEMEnTATIon 6 The Chanhassen Parks and Recreation System Plan will guide decision-making by the City Council, Park Commission, City Staff, partners, and the public over the next 20 years. This chapter identifies priority actions and improvements, associated costs, and potential funding sources to ensure the recommendations included in this plan become a reality. As the community grows and changes, new ideas or opportunities may arise that were not considered during the development of the System Plan. To ensure efficiency, a project evaluation toolkit is included at the end of this chapter. 6-63 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 Priorities Priorities are drawn from the recommendations identified in Chapter 5 and are organized into the four areas of capital improvements, plans/studies, management, and ongoing initiatives. They reflect community engagement and provide a to do list for the City. This is not a budget recommendation. Because each area’s success is important, prioritization across the four areas were not made. This will allow each area to receive needed attention and resources. The ability of the City to achieve these priorities will be a function of staff time and funding. While some initiatives may require a significant investment of either time or funding for a one-time improvement, others will involve a minimal amount of time on an on-going basis. It is also likely that some of the priorities that are lower on a list may be completed sooner than higher priorities due to funding or partnership opportunities. Implementation phasing should be flexible and dependent on regular project prioritization based on needs, funding availability, and partnership opportunities. Depending on funding availability, the City may need to explore the phasing of larger capital improvements, such as Lake Ann Park Expansion. While not ideal because it is generally more expensive and extends the time period the park is out of service, phasing does ensure there is funding available for other capital improvements at the same time. Total projected costs across all categories are included in the following table. Table 6-1. Total Initiative Costs Priority cost (low)cost (High) Short Term $5,770,000 $12,660,000 Long Term $31,075,000 $63,100,000 Ongoing $500,000 $5,000,000 Trail Gaps $4,943,000 $14,831,000 total $42,288,000 $95,591,000 (Total Without Signature Facility) $17,288,000 $45,591,000 Table 6-2 provides a prioritized list of capital investment initiatives, Table 6-3 provides prioritized plan/study initiatives, Table 6-4 provides prioritized management initiatives, and Table 6-5 summarizes ongoing initiatives. Costs provided are planning level estimates that need to be further refined with detailed planning. All costs are in 2017 dollars and include any professional services that may be required (i.e. surveyors, architects, etc.). Historical inVestment The priorities identified in the Parks and Recreation System build on historical investments made by previous generations. Although there is no exact accounting of the true dollar value of all existing park and recreation amenities in the community, the City’s current asset management program identifies over $33,000,000 in park and trail investments. These investments include more than $7 million in land acquisition, $10 million facility improvements, $17 million in trail development, and $2 million in maintenance. 6-64 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 location or area capital investment initiative cost (low)cost (High) sHort term $5,660,000 $12,415,000 Bandimere Picnic Shelter with restroom $350,000 $750,000 Bandimere Sport Court $250,000 $350,000 City-wide Install additional ballfield safety fencing identified through a ballfield safety study $100,000 $300,000 Community Park Add a destination splash pad at a community park. Ensure expansion includes additional parking if needed and user amenities like benches, restrooms, and changing facilities. $750,000 $2,500,000 Disc Golf Add permanent concrete tee boxes and improved site amenities to support users at the Bandimere disc golf course. $60,000 $90,000 Pickleball Support pickleball by adding user amenities like seating, wind screens, and sun canopies. $40,000 $100,000 Trails Work with partner agencies to reopen the Minnesota River Bluff LRT Regional Trail. TBD with partner agencies Bandimere Field Light for three diamond fields and one rectangular field $750,000 $1,000,000 Bandimere Hockey Warming House $100,000 $250,000 Bandimere Provide a lighted, artificial turf multi-use field at Bandimere Park to expand capacity, ensure playability, provide a premier field, and protect and allow for more resting of grass fields.$1,000,000 $1,800,000 City Center Add a picnic shelter with permanent restrooms at City Center Park $500,000 $750,000 Community Garden Explore opportunities for a second community garden. $15,000 $50,000 Lake Ann Permanent Restroom by Klingelhutz Memorial Pavilion $250,000 $350,000 Lake Ann Permanent Restroom and Concessions Stand by Athletic Fields $200,000 $500,000 Lake Ann Additional Electronic Scoreboards $40,000 $75,000 Lake Susan Renovate existing picnic shelter and upgrade permanent restrooms $100,000 $250,000 Lake Susan Expand parking $30,000 $100,000 Lake Susan Field Lights $200,000 $300,000 Lake Susan Field Structured Seating $80,000 $300,000 Nature Play Add community scale nature play at a community park $500,000 $1,250,000 Nature Play Add unstructured nature play at four sites throughout the community $30,000 $100,000 Skate Park Develop and implement a phased improvement plan for improvements to the skate park. $50,000 $400,000 Trails Enhance user experiences through kiosks/signage at existing trailheads, benches, lighting, garbage cans, etc. $250,000 $750,000 Volleyball Improve existing volleyball facilities within community parks through improved seating, nets, and shelters. $15,000 $100,000 lonG term $31,000,000 $63,000,000 Community Center Identify and construct a year-round signature recreation facility in the community that includes indoor, outdoor, and passive spaces. $25,000,000 $50,000,000 City-wide Based on current trends combined with projected demand, Chanhassen should plan for new multi-purpose field construction (1-3 fields) in the next 15 years. $2,000,000 $5,000,000 City-wide Seek opportunities to expand the capacity of the community park network to serve athletic and community event needs. $1,000,000 $3,000,000 Interpretive Center Establish an interpretive center with an outdoor lab space and a destination nature based play area to support natural resources outreach and education. $3,000,000 $5,000,000 Lake Ann Park Potential Lake Ann Park Expansion ------ caPital inVestment total $36,660,000 $75,415,000 (Total Without Signature Facility)($11,660,000) ($25,415,000) Table 6-2. Prioritized Capital Investment Initiatives 6-65 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 Table 6-3. Prioritized Plan/Study Initiatives location or area Plan/study initiative cost (low)cost (High) sHort term $110,000 $245,000 Accessibility Complete an audit of system ADA accessibility and address issues identified. $15,000 $40,000 Lake Ann Park Complete master plan $40,000 $80,000 Recreation Center Signature Recreation Facility Studies - community center, senior center, and aquatics facilities need $30,000 $60,000 Trails Expand the number of natural surface trails by mapping existing locations, identifying opportunities, and incorporating trail expansion in the Capital Improvement Plan. $10,000 $20,000 Trails Initiate a single-track mountain bike trail study. $10,000 $25,000 Trails Explore opportunities to add trailheads. $5,000 $20,000 lonG term $75,000 $100,000 Preserves Prioritize the development of natural resource management plans. $75,000 $100,000 Plan/stUDy total $185,000 $345,000 location or area management initiative* sHort term Operations Establish an Event Management Plan to address the registration and notification process; cost recovery; and strategies to minimize general park user impacts associated with non-City sponsored events seeking to utilize Chanhassen’s parks or trails. Operations Consider the creation of a tobacco use policy for the parks and recreation system. Preserves Expand awareness of preserves through marketing and wayfinding. Programming Collaborate with the Arts Consortium of Carver County to support the expansion of arts related programming in the City. Senior Center Expand Senior Center awareness through rebranding and a marketing campaign. Trails Increase awareness and expanded trail use through maps and trail wayfinding to help identify loops, distances, and destinations. Trails Support trail accessibility through the identification of easily accessible routes that do not have steep slopes, gaps, or challenging transitions. Operations Communicate benefits of parks and recreation system, including the impact of the preserves and races/tournaments on the business community. Preserves Encourage expansion of opportunities for increased interaction and exploration of nature (i.e. natural surface trails, interpretation, programming, signage, wayfinding, maps, etc.) lonG term Operations Reduce impervious surfaces and explore turf conversion to native plantings in the design of parks and facilities. Operations Incorporate innovative sustainable design and maintenance practices to make Chanhassen a model to residents and surrounding communities. Programming Expand the number of informal, indoor and outdoor, seasonal recreation events. Programming Expand nature based events and programs. Programming Collaborate with high school youth leaders to organize quarterly teen activities (fun runs, music, arts) and pilot programs. *All Management Initiatives will require a consultant or increased staffing to complete Table 6-4. Prioritized Management Initiatives 6-66 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 initiative type location or area initiative notes Capital Investment City-wide Use maintenance and replacement schedule to plan for phased replacement of neighborhood park facilities (i.e. playgrounds, sport courts, shelters, etc.). Cost to be determined with maintenance and replacement database currently under development Capital Investment City-wide Add parks and/or preserves as development occurs in the Bluff Creek Golf Course, Bluff Creek Corridor, and County Road 61 Corridor Plan areas. Cost ranges from $500,000 to $5,000,000 Capital Investment City-wide Pilot facilities for new or trending sports to assess appropriateness for park system, cost, durability, and demand. Management City-wide Based on national standards and desires of the baseball community, the City should continue to emphasize flexibility in the ballfields with basepaths and moveable pitching rubbers or mounds to better meet the demands for 75’ and 90’ basepath ballfields. Management Operations Annually evaluate that the City’s pricing structure reflects the benefits of the program or event to the community versus the individual. Management Operations Ensure the System Plan is used as a basis for the annual budgeting and capital improvement planning process to evaluate and address the parks and recreation system needs, including staffing, program/event expansion, facility expansion, maintenance, and replacement. Management Operations Incorporate stormwater best practices, such as rain gardens, bio-swales, and permeable pavers, in park and facility design. Management Operations Preserve natural buffers and setbacks around wetlands, rivers, ponds, reservoirs, and lakes on appropriate public lands and parks. Management Operations Improve water conservation and energy efficiency of facilities when renovating or constructing new. Management Operations Annually assess trail maintenance policies for debris removal and winter plowing. Reevaluate and amend winter plowing plans based on factors like historical maintenance, commuting routes, safe routes to school, and resident requests. Management Operations Establish a formal process for program and event development and evaluation and trend analysis. Management Preserves Identify and prioritize the protection of natural areas that provide corridors/linkages between parks, preserves, and other destinations. Management Preserves Collaborate with other government agencies in the protection of the Seminary Fen and the Minnesota River Valley. Management Preserves Continue to preserve sensitive lands within the Bluff Creek Corridor. Management Programming Continue to host at least five major community events in the city (currently there is Feb Fest, Easter Egg Hunt, 4th of July, Halloween, Tree Lighting). Management Programming Continue to partner with area business and organizations to provide summer concert series. Management Programming Continue to collaborate with schools and other organizations to provide public recreation activities in the parks. Table 6-5. Ongoing Initiatives 6-67 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 trail Gap name trail Distance (miles)year Planned responsibility surface type cost (low) assumes $40/linear ft. cost (High) assumes $120/linear ft. sHort term $1,101,000 $3,301,000 Arboretum 1.56 2019 City/County/Arb Paved $329,000 $988,000 Bluff Creek Dr. - Hwy 212 to Flying Cloud Dr.0.98 2019 County Paved $207,000 $620,000 Hwy 5 - Hazeltine Blvd. to Century Blvd.0.32 2019 City/County/Arb Paved $67,000 $202,000 Hwy 41 Trail - Hwy 5 to W 78th Street 0.25 City Paved $50,000 $148,000 Chanhassen Hills Park 0.09 City Paved $19,000 $56,000 Galpin Blvd. - to Shorewood 0.11 Multi-Agency Paved $22,000 $67,000 Powers Blvd. - to Shorewood 0.07 Multi-Agency Paved $14,000 $42,000 Great Plains Blvd. - Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud 1.15 Multi-Agency Paved $243,000 $729,000 Hwy 7 - Lake Minnetonka LRT to Minnewashta Pkwy 0.71 Multi-Agency Paved $150,000 $449,000 lonG term $1,651,000 $4,952,000 Camp Tanadoona 0.26 Multi-Agency Paved or Natural Surface $55,000 $165,000 Chanhassen Nature Preserve (Central)0.27 City Natural Surface/ Boardwalk $56,000 $169,000 Dogwood Rd.0.69 City Paved $147,000 $440,000 Hwy 212 - Powers Blvd. to Lyman Blvd.0.97 City Paved $205,000 $614,000 Hwy 7 - Washta Bay Rd. to Hazeltine Blvd.0.77 Multi-Agency Paved $163,000 $490,000 Tanadoona Dr.0.65 City Paved $137,000 $411,000 Twin Cities and Western Trail Corridor 4.20 Multi-Agency Paved or Aggregate $888,000 $2,663,000 comBine WitH FUtUre roaD ProJect $1,223,000 $3,671,000 82nd Street 1.31 Multi-Agency Paved $276,000 $829,000 Audubon Rd. to Bluff Creek 0.37 City/Developer Paved $78,000 $233,000 Cathcart Park 0.33 City Paved $70,000 $209,000 Hwy 41 - South of Hwy 5 to Chaska 0.54 Multi-Agency Paved $114,000 $341,000 Lake Susan Dr.0.49 City New Sidewalk $104,000 $313,000 Lake Susan Preserve to Chanhassen Hills Park 0.18 City New Sidewalk $38,000 $114,000 Pioneer Trail - Powers Blvd. to Great Plains Blvd.0.77 Multi-Agency Paved $162,000 $487,000 Pleasantview Road 1.34 City Paved $282,000 $847,000 Tecumseh Ln.0.47 City New Sidewalk $99,000 $298,000 Table 6-6. Trail Gap Priorities 6-68 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 trail Gap name trail Distance (miles)year Planned responsibility surface type cost (low) assumes $40/linear ft. cost (High) assumes $120/linear ft. constrUct WitH DeVeloPment $968,000 $2,907,000 Bluff Creek Blvd. to Powers Blvd. (North side)0.51 City/Developer Paved $108,000 $324,000 Bluff Creek Blvd. to Powers Blvd. (South side)0.50 City/Developer Paved $105,000 $316,000 Chanhassen Nature Preserve (West)0.17 City/Developer Paved $35,000 $105,000 Fox Woods Preserve to Bandimere Park 0.55 City/Developer Paved $117,000 $351,000 Galpin Blvd. to Lake Lucy/Lake Ann 0.69 Paved $146,000 $438,000 Hwy 212 Bridge Trail 0.18 City/Developer Paved $37,000 $112,000 Lake Ann Loop 1.23 City/Developer Paved $259,000 $777,000 Lake Lucy Loop 0.40 City/Developer Paved $85,000 $256,000 Lyman Blvd.0.36 Multi-Agency Paved $76,000 $228,000 trail GaPs total $4,943,000 $14,831,000 trail crossinG saFety concerns Several trail crossing safety concerns were pointed out during the community engagement process. Those identified through the process are identified on the map to the left. Additional areas of concern may also exist and are annually reviewed. Safety for trail crossings are addressed using a variety of techniques depending on factors such as right-of-way availability, traffic volume, visibility, and grades. Safety for crossings may be improved through markings, lights, or grade separated tunnels or bridges. In addition to collaboration between the City’s Parks and Recreation and Engineering Department, trail safety crossings often involve other jurisdictions, like the County, as well as property owners. While trail safety crossing improvements are not a specific initiative of the Parks and Recreation System Plan, supporting others within the City to address these concerns should be an ongoing effort. CenturyBoulevardHazeltineBoulevardBluffCreek Drive West 78th Street Lyman Boulevard ChanhassenRoadCrosstown Boulevard Pleasant Vi e wRoad GreatPlain s Boulev a r dB a varia R o adSmithtownRoad P io n e erT railW estL o n g a c resDriv eVictoriaDrive Arboretum Bo ulevard Powe r s Boul evardKerberBoulevardLake Lucy Road MinnewashtaParkwayCounty Road 140 L ake DriveEast He ronDrive Engler Boulevard Hun d ertm arkRoadEastGalpinBoulevardAudubonRoadPioneer Trail 82nd Street West F l y i n g C l o u d D r iv e Chas k a B o u le v ardLakeDrive Pioneer Trail EastChestnutStreetNorthWest82ndStreet ")140 ")53 ¬«101 ¬«7 £¤212 ¬«5 ")61 ¬«101 ¬«101 L o t usL a k eL a k e S u s a n LakeRileyR iceL akeLakeMinnewashta LakeA n n L a keL ucyR i c e M a r sh L a k e E d e n P r a i r i e E x c e l s i o r G r e e n w o o d M i n n e t o n k aShorewood T o n k a B a y J a c k s o n T w p . S h a k o p e e C h a s k a V i c t o r i a LEGEND ""Existing Overpass ##Existing Trail Head !!Existing Underpass GIdentified Safety C ro ssing Concern Trail Gap Existing Sidewalk Existing Trail Open Space Community Park Neighborhood Park Preserve Special Use Non-City Parks & Open Space Public School Existing Region al Trails Surrounding Municipal Trails Surrounding Municipal Parks Water Bodies Municipal Boun daries °0 0.5 10.25 Mile s a B c DG Hi J k l m n o P e F 6-69 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 Maintenance and replacement The Parks and Recreation System Planning process included the development of a framework for the creation of a maintenance and replacement schedule that would identify timeframes and estimated costs for major park infrastructure, including playgrounds, hard surface courts, shelters, etc. This schedule does not include ongoing maintenance costs like mowing, plowing, or trash removal. The maintenance and replacement schedule is intended to assist in long-term budgeting for ongoing, non-capital costs, as well as the selection of projects for the annual capital improvement program. The mainteance and replacement schedule is an ongoing endeavor that will be updated as new investments are made or aging structures are removed. While major system components have been identified, Staff continues to add detail on park infrastructure like fencing, retaining walls, etc. The maintenance and replacement schedule developed to date indicates that the Parks and Recreation System requires an investment of approximately $ 350,000 annually. This average was developed by looking at the total anticipated costs for 2017 to 2040 and calculating a yearly average. The actual costs needed for an individual year will vary based on the types of repair, repalcement, and maintenance needed. For example, some years may have higher costs due to a larger facility needing replacement or that there are a number of facilities that are anticipated to need replacement. A summary of the amount investment needed in specific areas is provided below. It is estimated that the current Parks and Recreation System will require more than $8 million through 2040 for maintenance and replacement. category Description total cost 2017-2040 Playgrounds Replacement of equipment $2.6 million Courts Replacement of tennis, basketball, volleyball, and pickleball courts and resurfacing of tennis/pickleball courts every 9 years $1.5 million Shelters Replacement of park shelters on a 35 to 40 year schedule $ 250,000 Fields Annual maintenance including fertilization $ 1.0 million Fences/Walls Replacement on a 30 year schedule $2.1 million Miscellaneous Replacement of Docks, Dugouts, Disc Golf, Skate Park, Irrigation Systems, Lighting and annual maintenance of lighting, hockey rinks, and irrigation systems $ 640,000 Total $8.1 million Table 6-7. Maintenance and Replacement Costs 2017-2040 6-70 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Funding options While a parks and recreation system is an essential component of the quality of life in a community, ensuring sufficient funding can be challenging when compared to other city services such as water, sewer, and public safety. To achieve the vision set forth in the Parks and Recreation System Plan, additional investment will be needed. This investment will not only be needed to support system expansion, but for the replacement of existing system components. The following are potential options the City could explore to expand and diversify funding for parks and recreation: »Increase Parks and Recreation’s share of the general fund. »Increase funding from the General Fund for maintenance work. »Establish a Maintenance and Replacement Fund to cover major capital repairs and replacements. »Explore the use of a franchise fee to fund maintenance or specific programs. »Explore a bond referendum for a specific package of capital improvements. »Evaluate the potential value of sponsorship for all assets, programs, and events in the system based on user demographics and participation/ visitation. Use the data to create an enhanced sponsorship catalog to target local and regional sponsors and corporate partnerships. »Continue to strategically pursue grants focused on those whose funding amounts are sufficient to outweigh administrative requirements. »Continue to build and enhance partnerships with schools, athletic associations, nonprofits and others. »Explore collaboration funding opportunities in areas like public health, public art, programming, and sustainability. »Pilot use of a crowdfunding tool for small, targeted project (kickstarter.org, razoo.com or NRPA Fund Your Park). PUBlic-PriVate PartnersHiPs Public-Private Partnerships are already a key component of Chanhassen’s System. The level of partnership is so extensive that many in the community are not aware of when the City is providing the service and when it is a partner. Some public-private partnerships are relatively simple, a non-profit holding an event using park facilities, for example, while others can be quite complex, such as a public-private partnership to develop a regional park or event facility. As public- private partnerships are developed, the following should be considered: »Ensure both entities share the same vision and definition of success at the beginning of the project. »Provide a consistent, fair, and open review process for the development of partnerships. »Assess and align strengths of each entity (for example, a private vendor may be more efficient and effective in providing concessions or renting equipment). »Conduct an independent financial analysis of the viability of the partnership. »Negotiate formal agreements that clearly identify responsibilities, expectations (type of service, hours, fees), revenue/expense sharing, etc. »Make sure partnerships are not concentrated to only the highest quality sites, but instead serve a broad spectrum of the community. »Identify potential use of volunteers and assess any potential liability from their involvement. »Promote cultural sensitivity and sustainability in partners. »Recognize public staff time will be needed to manage partnership. The City may find it beneficial to further formalize its public-private partnership process. The City of Portland, Oregon and Montgomery County Parks, Maryland may be good resources for the development of policies and procedures. 6-71 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 Funding Sources Achieving the vision and mission for the parks and recreation system will take additional funding, not only for big, exciting new facilities like the expansion of Lake Ann Park or a signature recreational facility, but for also for park revitalization and maintenance, improvements to accessibility, etc. Significant investment is needed for Chanhassen to provide the type of parks and recreation system identified in this System Plan. It is estimated that the priorities identified will cost from $42.4 million to over $95 million to implement. Additional initiative implementation, as well as system maintenance and reinvestment needs, will be significantly more. Table 6-7 Funding Sources highlights the types of funding sources that may be appropriate for various types of initiatives. The table is followed by brief descriptions of each of the funding sources. Priorities General Funds Park Dedica-tion Grants Partner-ships Donations state aid Funds Park Bond referen-dum Utility Fee System Planning (facility study, park master plan, trail plan, natural resource plan, ADA accessibility audit, etc.) 1 k k Parkland Acquisition 1 1 e k k 1 Maintenance and Replacement 1 k k e k User Amenities (benches, shade, restrooms, water fountains, wayfinding, etc.) 1 k k k e Park and Facility Development (signature facility, fields, courts, playgrounds, etc.) 1 1 e e k 1 Trail Expansion e e e k e 1 e Natural Resources Management 1 e k k e k Programming and Events 1 k 1 k Public Art Initiatives k e 1 k Accessibility Improvements e k 1 k Best Funding source likely Funding source Possible Funding source 1 e k key Table 6-8. Funding Sources 6-72 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 General Funds General funds can and should be used to develop and maintain the parks and recreation system. General funds are the primary funding source for on-going maintenance, operations, and amenities. Most grants also have a matching requirement, which is often fulfilled with general funds. Dedicated tax levy A city can hold a referendum for a dedicated tax levy with proceeds directed specifically for parks and recreation. This levy can be used for capital projects as well as operations and maintenance. The proceeds may be in place of general funds or be supplemented by general funds. The advantage of a dedicated tax levy is that parks and recreation receives a more stable source of funding and does not have to compete with other city priorities for funding on an annual basis. Bonding General Obligation Bonds and Revenue Bonds provide another source of implementation funding for new public facilities, as well as repairs and/or upgrades to existing facilities. General Park Bond issue Residents can decide to raise revenue through a permanent or temporary tax increase dedicated for specific purposes such as park, trail, and bikeway improvements and maintenance. These funds are usually provided through bonds approved as part of a voter referendum. state aid Funds State aid funds are available for pedestrian and bicycle improvements on state aid streets. This funding source is particularly useful at the time of street construction or re-construction. Park and trail Dedication Minnesota Statutes allow local governments to require dedication of land or cash in-lieu of land for parks and trails from new subdivisions. The dedication must be reasonable and rationally related to the recreation demand created by the development. Cities can also require dedication of right-of-way or easements for sidewalks or trails. Chanhassen has a park dedication ordinance that recognizes the impacts that increased residents and employees have on the parks and recreation system. It seeks to ensure that areas are preserved for future parks and trails. It establishes a cash in-lieu of land fees where the dedication of land is not feasible or practical or will not create a site useable for park purposes. Fees collected are deposited into the City’s park and recreation development fund or its multipurpose trail fund and are used for the development of new or expanded facilities. Park dedication may not be used for maintenance or replacement of existing facilities. The City has and will continue to update its park dedication ordinance from time to time to reflect changes to Minnesota Statutes. 6-73 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 Utility/Franchise Fees Franchise fees are included on the monthly bill that customers receive from a utility, such as natural gas, electricity or cable. The fee can be a flat amount each month or a percentage of the monthly bill. A franchise fee can be implemented with an ordinance, which must be approved by the City Council. About 4% of communities participating in HKGi’s 2015 Park Finance and Dedication Survey use utility fees as a source of financing related to parks. school Districts The City partners with Eastern Carver County Schools and Minnetonka Schools in a variety of ways, including the use of athletic facilities and for programming. The City has agreements with Eastern Carver County Schools for joint use of facilities at Chanhassen Elementary, Bluff Creek Elementary, and Chanhassen High School. Open communication between the City and the school districts are important for continued collaboration. Communication should occur on at least an annual basis about planned projects and additional opportunities to jointly manage public facilities and provide programming. Partnerships Public and private partnerships have been key to the development of the parks and recreation system. These relationships have led to the development of parks, operation of athletic facilities, development and implementation of community programming and events, and natural resource management. Partnerships will continue to be important for both facilities and programming. Organizations with partner funding can also provide assistance with design, outreach and maintenance. Partnerships and relationships with private businesses can also result in easements and use agreements for trails across private land. Donations Private donations are another potential funding source. These may be financial donations from individuals or area corporations, or donations of labor from recreation clubs or use agreements. Programs such as “adopt-a-trail” or “adopt-a-park” by an organization, business, or individuals have been used in many communities to help with maintenance tasks and raise awareness. Grants Grants are a way to make Chanhassen’s dollars go further. The City has been successful at securing grant funding and should continue to pursue opportunities when potential award outweigh the costs for applying or administrating. Below is a sample of grant opportunities that may be available, along with websites to visit for more information. Minnesota DNR Website: www.dnr.state.mn.us/grants/index.html The Minnesota DNR is one of the most comprehensive resources when it comes to state funding for park and trail programs. They offer a variety of grant programs and technical assistance. Current programs provide assistance for 6-74 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Minnesota DOT Website: www.dot.state.mn.us/grants/ A portion of most trail or bikeway improvement projects funded through Minnesota DOT is from federal dollars. Examples of programs typically funding trail or sidewalk improvement projects include Safe Routes to School or the Transportation Alternatives Program managed by the District 6 ATP. Given the size of these grants the City should begin preparing in advance for future applications by identifying the type of improvement, the right-of-way needs, preliminary layout, and cost estimates. Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment On Nov. 4 2008, Minnesota voters approved the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment to the Minnesota State Constitution which increased the general sales and use tax rate by three-eighths of one percentage point (0.375%) to 6.875% and dedicated the additional proceeds for the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund, the Outdoor Heritage Fund, Clean Water Fund, and Parks and Trails Fund. Funding from the Legacy Amendment is administered by a variety of agencies such as the Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, Department of Health, Historical Society, Minnesota State Arts Board and regional art councils. A number of new grant programs were created. Information about grant opportunities can be found on individual state department and organization websites. Foundations & Non-Profits There are foundations and non-profits that are interested in fulfilling their missions by supporting local projects. There are a number of on-line tools that can assist with the process of identifying additional foundations that may provide financial support for park, trail, and bikeway improvements. The Minnesota Council of Foundations is a great starting point for identifying foundations. Another good starting point is to consider the businesses within Chanhassen and identifying those that have a foundation or charitable giving department. In addition to retailers and manufacturers, be sure to consider businesses such as the railroad, energy providers and communications companies. 6-75 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 Park element capital cost annual o&m cost estimated life (years)notes neW Park DeVeloPment Neighborhood Park $90,000/Acre $550/Acre 25-50 Community Park No new parks anticipated $550/Acre 25-50 General GroUnDs & lanDscaPinG Mowed Turf Grass (Irrigated)$60,000/Acre New Sod $34,000/Acre New Seed $1,000/Acre 15-30 Includes mowing, trimming, fertilizing, weed control, aerating & overseeding. Mowed Turf Grass (Non Irrigated)$30,000/Acre New Sod $2,000/Acre New Seed $800/Acre 15-30 Does not assume hydroseed. Includes mowing, trimming, fertilizing, weed control, aerating & overseeding. Irrigation $25,000/Acre $1,300/Acre 25 Contractual Landscape Maintenance $6.50 Sq. Ft. ($282,600/Acre)$.25 Sq. Ft. ($9,250/Acre)20 Prairie Restoration $5,000/Acre $300/Acre Naturalized Shoreline $100/LF $400/Acre Rain Garden $10/Sq. Ft.$300/Acre Low end - high end could be up to $20/ Sq Ft Woodland / Slope Restoration $4,000/Acre $400/Acre Assumes restoration of existing wooded area. $20,000/Acre if new tree planting required Park BUilDinG & sHelters Buildings with Restrooms $300-$400/Sq. Ft.$11,000/Bldg./Yr.40 Includes all buildings Picnic Shelters $150-$200/Sq. Ft.$3,800/Bldg./Yr.40 Includes all shelters trails & sUrFaces Trails (10 Ft. Wide Asphalt)$50/LF $5,280 Per Mile 30 Parking Lots (Asphalt)$2,500-$3,000/Stall $20-$25 Per Stall 40 Sidewalks (Concrete)$30/Linear foot Assumes 6 foot wide sidewalk Natural Surface Trails $30/Linear foot if limestone ADA or $5/Linear foot if rustic footpath $500/Mile - general Capital, operations, & Maintenance Costs The following table is a tool the City can use to initially evaluate and budget for new improvements. Equally important to the initial capital costs for a project are ongoing operations and maintenance costs. Adequately budgeting operations and maintenance ensures that facilities fulfill life expectancy and that parks remain safe and welcoming. All costs are planning level costs in 2017 dollars and do not necessarily reflect additional costs, such as engineering, design, construction administration, and staff time. Table 6-9. General Capital, Operations, & Maintenance Costs 6-76 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 Park element capital cost annual o&m cost estimated life (years)notes Park amenities Lighting $15,000 15 Includes 2-3 pedestrian scale light posts Pickleball Court $25,000 $400/Court 25 Includes paving, fencing, striping, net Tennis Courts $125,000 $1,000/Court 25 Assumes 12,500 Sq. Ft. Double Court. Resurfacing includes striping of both tennis and pickleball cost of $10,000 per court Basketball Courts - Half $15,000/Court $600/Court 25 Includes base, paving, hoops, striping Basketball Courts - Full $25,000/Court $600/Court 25 Includes base, paving, hoops, striping Combined Basketball/Tennis Court $35,000/Court $600/Court 25 Includes base, paving, hoops, striping, nets Sand Volleyball Court $10,000/Court 25 Includes sand and nets Playground - Small $25,000 $1,000/Site 25 Assumes neighborhood build - includes equipment only Playground - Medium $60,000 $1,200/Site 25 Assumes neighborhood build - includes equipment only Playground - Large/premium $100,000 $1,500/Site 25 Assumes neighborhood build - includes equipment only Nature Play Areas $50,000-$100,000 $1,000/Site 20 Assumes 1 to 2 signature features and remainder natural materials Skate Park Equipment $40/Sq. Ft.$3,000/Site 15 Includes equipment only Outdoor Hockey Rink $80,000-$100,000 $9,000/Rink 20 Full size rink with wooden boards Community Gardens $10,000-$20,000/Acre $800 Acre - Off-Leash Dog Park $10,000-$50,000 Acre $800 Acre 15-20 Fishing Pier $25,000 20 Includes 100’ long wood pier with railings Dock $10,000 20 Includes 40’ long metal dcok Swimming Beach $15,000 25 Includes grading and sand Splash Pad $600,000 $5,000 15-20 Amphitheater $800,000 50 Assumes open stage and seating for 200+ Disc Golf Course $25,000 25 Neighborhood Park Amenity Package $35,000/park Included in general park costs 20 Assumes 1-$25,000 shade structure; 2- $2,000 benches with concrete pad, 2- $2,000 bike racks with concrete pad, 2-$1,000 waste receptacles Community Park Amenity Package $55,000/park Included in general park costs 20 Assumes 1-$40,000 shade structure; 4- $2,000 benches with concrete pad, 2- $2,000 bike racks with concrete pad, 3-$1,000 waste receptacles 6-77 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 Project review Process One of the most challenging things for a parks and recreation department is knowing when to say “yes” to a potential project and when to say “no.” The project review process outlined in Figure 6-1 provides a sample outline for a systematic review of new requests. This type of review ensures that new projects that are in-line with system-wide goals can be adequately funded, staffed, and maintained prior to implementation. To ensure the project review process is as efficient as possible, a project proposal worksheet (Figure 6-2) has been developed. This worksheet should be filled out by the organization, association, or individual who is approaching the City with a project idea. Completed worksheets will allow the City to review and, if approved, begin implementing the new project more efficiently. Park element capital cost annual o&m cost estimated life (years)notes atHletic FielDs Field Lighting $225,000/field $500/field 30 Fencing $40/Linear foot 20 8 ft black vinyl chainlink fence Diamond Field - Low maintenance $1,500/acre new seed; $25000/acre new sod $800/Acre 25 Includes play surface & striping; non- irrigated, practice field Diamond Field - Average maintenance $1,500/acre new seed; $25000/acre new sod $2,300/Field 20 Includes play surface & striping; non- irrigated Diamond Field - High maintenance $27,000/acre new seed and aglime; $50,000/acre new sod $4,200/Field 15 Includes play surface & striping; irrigated Irrigation System $50,000/field $500/field 15 Rectangular Field - Practice field, low maintenance $15,000 25 Includes grass surface, striping Rectangular Field - Youth size, average maintenance $25,000 - $65,000 $800 - $4,200/Field 15 Includes grading, grass surface, striping; cost range based on sod/seed, and irrigated/non-irrigated field Rectangular Field - Youth size, high maintenance $60,000 10 Includes grading, grass surface, irrigation updates Rectangular Field - Adult size, average maintenance $2,250/field new seed; $37,500/field new sod $2,000/Field 10 Includes grass surface Rectangular Field - Adult size, high maintenance $30,000/acre new seed; $65,000/acre new sod $4,200/Field 10 Includes grading, grass surface; irrigated * Costs are for turf/field/irrigation only, no additional amenities Note: All costs are planning level estimates in 2017 dollars and do not include costs for engineering, design, and staff facilitation time. 6-78 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 CounCil ACTion: authorize project and authorize maintenance and continued funding 1. iDea eValUation PHase 2. PlanninG PHase idea Generation »Idea may come from Parks and Recreation Commission, public, stakeholders, or staff »Complete project proposal should include: description of project, facilities affected, need, benefits, costs, funding sources, timeframe, permits needed, availability to the public, and description of how it meets criteria set forth in decision principle checklist implementation »Construction documents »Construction »Program delivery »Method for measuring success is defined operation of Facility or Programs & Maintenance »Facility or program is now serving the public need »Reporting provided to Commission and Council »Include routine maintenance and upkeep in budgets and schedules 3. imPlementation PHase Planning »Concept refinement »Preliminary plan »Final plan »Program timetable Program Prioritization »Project is prioritized based on policy decisions, public needs, and other initiatives Funding Allocation »Funding for all aspects of the program/project are approved and annual operations and maintenance and staffing costs are addressed CounCil ACTion: authorize funding City Council Review »Review proposal, evaluating if the idea has merit, how it relates to guiding principles and policies, and broad-based fiscal implications CounCil ACTion: authorize staff to proceed to planning phase or not Baseline Evaluation by Staff »Test idea against system plan guiding principles, recommendations, and decision principles »Depending on the scope of the idea, decision can be made by staff or introduced to the Parks & Recreation Commission STAFF ACTion: authorize project Parks & Recreation Commission Review »Review proposal, evaluating if the idea has merit, how it relates to guiding principles and policies, and broad-based fiscal implications »Depending on scope of the idea, decision can be made here or sent on to the City Council P+R CoMM. ACTion: authorize project Decision Principle Checklist Will the project... serve an unmet need? provide a new recreational opportunity? inspire community pride? increase awareness of history, culture, and art? advance outreach, communication, and community building with cultural groups? build community awareness, advocacy, and passion for recreation and parks? support healthy living and choices? improve efficiency of parks and recreation services? fulfill other city goals or policies? affect the environment positively or negatively? help engage and connect people, parks, trails, and open spaces? address a geographic or programming need identified in the system planning process? improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity? be economically sustainable in the short and long term? have adequate future funding for life cycle and operational costs? be a catalyst for private sector investment? be served by partnership and volunteer opportunities?WHO? WHAT? WHY?HOW?WHERE?Figure 6-1. Decision Principle Checklist 6-79 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 make yoUr oWn ProJect ProPosal Write your idea here! What is it? Page 1 Who does it?Where would you do it? Please fill out the following questions to the best of your ability, and feel free to attach any additional information if needed Will the project... serve an unmet need? provide a new recreational opportunity? inspire community pride? increase awareness of history, culture, and art? advance outreach, communication, and community building with cultural groups? build community awareness, advocacy, and passion for recreation and parks? support healthy living and choices? improve efficiency of parks and recreation services? fulfill other city goals or policies? affect the environment positively or negatively? help engage and connect people, parks, trails, and open spaces? address a geographic or programming need identified in the system planning process? improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity? be economically sustainable in the short and long term? have adequate future funding for life cycle and operational costs? be a catalyst for private sector investment? be served by partnership and volunteer opportunities? Please check all that apply and include a brief description of how each applicable question is addressed WHo? WHat? WHy?HoW?WHere?(Complete this worksheet and submit it to the City Parks and Recreation Department.) Figure 6-2. Project Proposal Worksheet 6-80 Chanhassen Parks & Recreation System Plan SEPTEMBER 2017 List Additional Resources & Considerations for the Project aDDitional inFormation Page 2 Proposer’s Name/Organization Goal/Motivation What is the primary reason for proposing this idea? What do you hope to achieve? Objectives What are the tangible/measurable outcomes you’d like to see in the short term (next 6 months)? Action Steps What needs to happen for your idea to become a reality? Who do you think would be responsible? Set a deadline! Action Responsibility Deadline 6-81 ImplementationSEPTEMBER 2017 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject 2022 Preliminary Budget Financial Plan Discussion Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.2. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY Staff is presenting budget and levy information and looking for guidance for 2022 budget development. Multi­year Financial Plans With the 2021 budget, the City expanded it's annual budget to take a comprehensive approach for all City funds including operating, capital, debt and enterprise funds.  There is a five­year financial plan for each fund which demonstrates the impact on fund balance of the current proposed budget and the projections for the following four years.  The 2021 budget included a first draft projection of the 2022 budget for each fund.  Some possible funding strategy changes to meet long­term capital funding challenges were shown. Staff has begun to update and refine those projections and to identify current budget pressures and funding opportunities in preparation to develop the 2022 budget. The discussion begins with the 2022 estimate developed in the 2021 Budget financial plans.  The strategic initiatives and action plans adopted by the Council in 2022 provide focus and direction for the development of the budget and allocation of resources.  Those strategic priorities are: Financial Sustainability Asset Management Development & Redevelopment Operation Excellence Communications The purpose of this discussion is intended to be a high level discussion of the policies and direction to be used to develop more detailed budget information for Council to consider in August. BACKGROUND 2020 Financial Results & Available Fund Balance The 2020 Annual Financial Report has been audited and is now final. Redpath & Company will present the audit results on the regular Council agenda at this meeting. The General Fund had a $1.4 million growth in fund balance.  This generates available fund balance which can be allocated to one­time uses. Expenditures were under budget in total by $824,000 due to dramatic cutbacks in recreation programs and other reductions in many departments related to the pandemic. Revenues in total exceeded budget by $586,000.  While CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 28, 2021Subject2022 Preliminary Budget Financial Plan DiscussionSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.2.Prepared By Kelly Strey, Finance Director File No: SUMMARYStaff is presenting budget and levy information and looking for guidance for 2022 budget development.Multi­year Financial PlansWith the 2021 budget, the City expanded it's annual budget to take a comprehensive approach for all City fundsincluding operating, capital, debt and enterprise funds.  There is a five­year financial plan for each fund whichdemonstrates the impact on fund balance of the current proposed budget and the projections for the following fouryears.  The 2021 budget included a first draft projection of the 2022 budget for each fund.  Some possible fundingstrategy changes to meet long­term capital funding challenges were shown.Staff has begun to update and refine those projections and to identify current budget pressures and fundingopportunities in preparation to develop the 2022 budget. The discussion begins with the 2022 estimate developed inthe 2021 Budget financial plans. The strategic initiatives and action plans adopted by the Council in 2022 provide focus and direction for thedevelopment of the budget and allocation of resources.  Those strategic priorities are:Financial SustainabilityAsset ManagementDevelopment & RedevelopmentOperation ExcellenceCommunicationsThe purpose of this discussion is intended to be a high level discussion of the policies and direction to be used todevelop more detailed budget information for Council to consider in August.BACKGROUND2020 Financial Results & Available Fund BalanceThe 2020 Annual Financial Report has been audited and is now final. Redpath & Company will present the audit resultson the regular Council agenda at this meeting. The General Fund had a $1.4 million growth in fund balance.  Thisgenerates available fund balance which can be allocated to one­time uses. Expenditures were under budget in total by $824,000 due to dramatic cutbacks in recreation programs and other reductions in many departments related to the pandemic. Revenues in total exceeded budget by $586,000.  While recreation revenues and many other revenues were below expectations, the losses were offset by two areas which were significantly in excess of budget: Permit & Licenses revenue exceeded budget by $418,000 Intergovernmental revenue included CARES funding of public safety staffing $419,000 Staff is proposing use of excess fund balance generated from CARES funding to the technology approved by Council on May 10, in anticipation of American Rescue Plan funding. Council approved moving forward on $400,000 of high priority technology expenditures to build on the successes of technology implemented for remote operations and to fully leverage technology improvements begun with CARES funding.  Staff is proposing this change because the current ARP guidance limits funding for technology to the extent of lost revenues.  The formula for lost revenues was recently clarified to include all City funds including franchise fees which is an unfavorable change for the City. Rather than delaying these high priority items, staff is proposing these technology expenditures continue to be a high priority in 2021 and are instead funded from 2020 budget savings generated from CARES funding which contributed to the increase in General Fund balance.   American Rescue Plan Impacts of the American Rescue Plan funding on the 2022 Budget and five­year projections will be evaluated once guidance is finalized and priorities are identified.  The City is scheduled to receive $2.7 million over the next two years. There are several general categories for qualified use of the funds. Federal guidance has been evolving since March and is still being interpreted.    At this time it is expected that category of water and sewer infrastructure may be the most efficient approach to apply for the funding.  Staff will continue to work on the funding strategies and options to create a balanced approach to leverage these funds to have the greatest impact for the City. Staff will present options to Council with the August budget plan. Financial Stability for all Funds Financial stability for all funds was a desired outcome identified in the Strategic Plan. Staff has prepared the initial five­ year financial plans with some proposed capital funding plans to address funding challenges identified in the 2021 budget process.  A combination of property taxes, other revenue sources, debt, and use of fund balance is being considered for each fund. The goal is to provide funding sources to meet expenditure needs while maintaining a fund balance for each fund within the appropriate target policies for each fund for the long term.  Some funds include plans to increase funding incrementally to reach a target goal over the course of the next few years. Budget for Current Service Levels Expenditure planning is based on maintaining current service levels and management of existing assets. This does not include any increases for expanding service levels or adding new assets. Staff will walk through the funding strategies for the capital plans in the presentation at the work session.  Based on the initial projections, from the 2021 budget the projected levy increase needed to maintain current service levels is 4.9%.  At this time, staff is still anticipating a 4.9% levy increase for current service levels.  Changes to any of the strategies would result in a change to this projection. Summary of Strategies & Pressures As discussed previously, 2021 accounting practices and budget strategies are changing significantly in many areas.  We are implementing best practices in cost allocations and long­term planning, as well as putting in place funding strategies that lead to financial stability in all funds.  As a result, there are many compounding changes across multiple funds.  We are making efforts to simplify the presentation as much as possible but we acknowledge the changes add an extra level of complication to the current year.  The goal is to create a consistent approach that will add transparency and financial stability going forward.  Here are some of the more significant changes: General fund Internal Service Funds implemented for IT, Fleet, Insurance, Employee Benefits (as approved earlier this year) Revised allocation of enterprise fund overhead CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 28, 2021Subject2022 Preliminary Budget Financial Plan DiscussionSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.2.Prepared By Kelly Strey, Finance Director File No: SUMMARYStaff is presenting budget and levy information and looking for guidance for 2022 budget development.Multi­year Financial PlansWith the 2021 budget, the City expanded it's annual budget to take a comprehensive approach for all City fundsincluding operating, capital, debt and enterprise funds.  There is a five­year financial plan for each fund whichdemonstrates the impact on fund balance of the current proposed budget and the projections for the following fouryears.  The 2021 budget included a first draft projection of the 2022 budget for each fund.  Some possible fundingstrategy changes to meet long­term capital funding challenges were shown.Staff has begun to update and refine those projections and to identify current budget pressures and fundingopportunities in preparation to develop the 2022 budget. The discussion begins with the 2022 estimate developed inthe 2021 Budget financial plans. The strategic initiatives and action plans adopted by the Council in 2022 provide focus and direction for thedevelopment of the budget and allocation of resources.  Those strategic priorities are:Financial SustainabilityAsset ManagementDevelopment & RedevelopmentOperation ExcellenceCommunicationsThe purpose of this discussion is intended to be a high level discussion of the policies and direction to be used todevelop more detailed budget information for Council to consider in August.BACKGROUND2020 Financial Results & Available Fund BalanceThe 2020 Annual Financial Report has been audited and is now final. Redpath & Company will present the audit resultson the regular Council agenda at this meeting. The General Fund had a $1.4 million growth in fund balance.  Thisgenerates available fund balance which can be allocated to one­time uses.Expenditures were under budget in total by $824,000 due to dramatic cutbacks in recreation programs and otherreductions in many departments related to the pandemic. Revenues in total exceeded budget by $586,000.  Whilerecreation revenues and many other revenues were below expectations, the losses were offset by two areas which weresignificantly in excess of budget:Permit & Licenses revenue exceeded budget by $418,000Intergovernmental revenue included CARES funding of public safety staffing $419,000Staff is proposing use of excess fund balance generated from CARES funding to the technology approved by Council onMay 10, in anticipation of American Rescue Plan funding. Council approved moving forward on $400,000 of high prioritytechnology expenditures to build on the successes of technology implemented for remote operations and to fully leveragetechnology improvements begun with CARES funding. Staff is proposing this change because the current ARP guidance limits funding for technology to the extent of lostrevenues.  The formula for lost revenues was recently clarified to include all City funds including franchise fees which isan unfavorable change for the City. Rather than delaying these high priority items, staff is proposing these technologyexpenditures continue to be a high priority in 2021 and are instead funded from 2020 budget savings generated fromCARES funding which contributed to the increase in General Fund balance.  American Rescue PlanImpacts of the American Rescue Plan funding on the 2022 Budget and five­year projections will be evaluated onceguidance is finalized and priorities are identified.  The City is scheduled to receive $2.7 million over the next two years.There are several general categories for qualified use of the funds. Federal guidance has been evolving since Marchand is still being interpreted.   At this time it is expected that category of water and sewer infrastructure may be the most efficient approach to applyfor the funding.  Staff will continue to work on the funding strategies and options to create a balanced approach toleverage these funds to have the greatest impact for the City. Staff will present options to Council with the August budgetplan.Financial Stability for all FundsFinancial stability for all funds was a desired outcome identified in the Strategic Plan. Staff has prepared the initial five­year financial plans with some proposed capital funding plans to address funding challenges identified in the 2021budget process.  A combination of property taxes, other revenue sources, debt, and use of fund balance is beingconsidered for each fund. The goal is to provide funding sources to meet expenditure needs while maintaining a fundbalance for each fund within the appropriate target policies for each fund for the long term.  Some funds include plansto increase funding incrementally to reach a target goal over the course of the next few years.Budget for Current Service LevelsExpenditure planning is based on maintaining current service levels and management of existing assets. This does notinclude any increases for expanding service levels or adding new assets. Staff will walk through the funding strategiesfor the capital plans in the presentation at the work session.  Based on the initial projections, from the 2021 budget theprojected levy increase needed to maintain current service levels is 4.9%.  At this time, staff is still anticipating a 4.9%levy increase for current service levels.  Changes to any of the strategies would result in a change to this projection.Summary of Strategies & PressuresAs discussed previously, 2021 accounting practices and budget strategies are changing significantly in many areas.  Weare implementing best practices in cost allocations and long­term planning, as well as putting in place funding strategiesthat lead to financial stability in all funds.  As a result, there are many compounding changes across multiple funds.  Weare making efforts to simplify the presentation as much as possible but we acknowledge the changes add an extra levelof complication to the current year.  The goal is to create a consistent approach that will add transparency and financialstability going forward.  Here are some of the more significant changes:General fundInternal Service Funds implemented for IT, Fleet, Insurance, Employee Benefits (as approved earlier this year) Revised allocation of enterprise fund overhead Engineering and Administrative Overhead Charges to projects Fees & charges review Allowance for compensation study implementation (TBD) Inflationary pressures Future FTE increase allowance annually (TBD) Special Revenue Funds Charitable contributions fund ­ change expenditures to capital vs. training Communications fund ­ FTE allocations adjusted / use of fund balance Capital Funds Equipment replacement funds split ­ Fleet, Facilities, IT, Equipment, Parks and current expenses to internal service funds (ISF) /general fund.    Beginning fund balance adjustments ISF charges to general fund and enterprise fund Annual incremental  increases built into property tax levy to keep pace with inflationary and growth pressures Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Fund bond for special assessments ­ frees up property tax levy for redirection to parks renovation Parks renovation fund ­ redirect some available property tax levy from PMP fund to provide stable annual funding to maintain existing assets Closed Debt Service Funds transfer of balances Enterprise Fund Expenditure increases: ISF charges Overhead allocation review Shared costs for facilities Capital allocations Monthly billing cost increases Meter replacement plan Funding increases: 2020/2021 Revenues exceeding budget American Rescue Plan funding  Financial Management Policies One of the strategic initiatives identified is to update and consolidate the City's financial policies into a comprehensive Financial Management Policy Document.  The policies will guide staff in preparation of the budget and in financial operations.  It will also provide guidance in Council decision­making process. Staff has prepared a draft of the financial management policies which will be discussed at the work session and will be presented for approval by the Council at the July 12 Council meeting.  Next Steps Staff has begun to work on the detailed operating and capital budgets.  Finance will compile those results into a proposed budget for setting the max tax.  This will be discussed at the August 16 Council work session. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Future Work Session Schedule Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.3. Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager File No:  SUMMARY The City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions: July 12: 1. Radio Encryption, Chanhassen Fire Department  July 26: 1. Traffic Safety Committee Presentation August 9: 1. Urban Land Institute Workshop with Planning Commission and Economic Development Commission August 16:  1. 2022 Budget & CIP Discuss ion August 23: 1. Discuss Results of Business Feedback Survey with Economic Development Commission September 13  1. Max Tax Discussion 2. City Council Quarterly Roundtable September 27 1. Fire Department Open House November 8 1. General Fund & Property Tax Supported Funds Discussion CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 28, 2021SubjectFuture Work Session ScheduleSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.3.Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager File No: SUMMARYThe City Council is tentatively scheduled to hold the following work sessions:July 12:1. Radio Encryption, Chanhassen Fire Department July 26:1. Traffic Safety Committee PresentationAugust 9:1. Urban Land Institute Workshop with Planning Commission and Economic Development CommissionAugust 16: 1. 2022 Budget & CIP Discuss ionAugust 23:1. Discuss Results of Business Feedback Survey with Economic Development CommissionSeptember 13 1. Max Tax Discussion2. City Council Quarterly RoundtableSeptember 271. Fire Department Open HouseNovember 8 1. General Fund & Property Tax Supported Funds Discussion November 22 1. Enterprise & CIP Discussion BACKGROUND Staff or the City Council may suggest topics for work sessions. Dates are tentative until the meeting agenda is published. Work sessions are typically held at 5:30 pm on the second and fourth Monday of each month in conjunction with the regular City Council meeting, but may be scheduled for other times as needed.  CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Invitation to 4th of July Celebration Section PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Item No: C.1. Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Supervisor File No:  SUMMARY I am thrilled to invite the community to the City of Chanhassen's largest community event of the year ­ the 38th annual 4th of July Celebration, back in full force this year! This celebration will be held on July 2, 3, & 4 at City Center Park and Lake Ann Park. The event is presented by the City of Chanhassen and sponsored by the 2021 Community Event Sponsors.  Friday, July 2 Family Night at the Carnival from 3­10pm  Saturday, July 3 Activities begin at 3pm and include:  Carnival rides   SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce Business Expo Taste of Chanhassen & Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen Kiddie parade & kids' activities  Skateboard competition  Live music by Stone Daisy Band The popular street dance, featuring a new band PopROCKS from 7:30­11pm under the big tent! Sunday, July 4 Events begin at 7am and include:  Two fishing contests Medallion hunt Carnival rides Live music by American Bootleg Taste of Chanhassen & Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen Classic Car Show, presented by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen 4th of July Parade, produced by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen The annual fireworks display over Lake Ann begins at 10pm.  CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 28, 2021SubjectInvitation to 4th of July CelebrationSectionPUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS Item No: C.1.Prepared By Priya Tandon, Recreation Supervisor File No: SUMMARYI am thrilled to invite the community to the City of Chanhassen's largest community event of the year ­ the 38th annual4th of July Celebration, back in full force this year! This celebration will be held on July 2, 3, & 4 at City Center Parkand Lake Ann Park. The event is presented by the City of Chanhassen and sponsored by the 2021 Community EventSponsors. Friday, July 2Family Night at the Carnival from 3­10pm Saturday, July 3Activities begin at 3pm and include: Carnival rides  SouthWest Metro Chamber of Commerce Business ExpoTaste of Chanhassen & Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of ChanhassenKiddie parade & kids' activities Skateboard competition Live music by Stone Daisy BandThe popular street dance, featuring a new band PopROCKS from 7:30­11pm under the big tent!Sunday, July 4Events begin at 7am and include: Two fishing contestsMedallion huntCarnival ridesLive music by American BootlegTaste of Chanhassen & Beer Garden, presented by the Rotary Club of ChanhassenClassic Car Show, presented by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen4th of July Parade, produced by the Rotary Club of Chanhassen The annual fireworks display over Lake Ann begins at 10pm.  Bring your families, neighbors, and friends for three days of fun! I look forward to seeing everyone there! CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated June 14, 2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the City Council minutes dated June 14, 2021.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Work Session Summary Minutes Summary Minutes CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MINUTES JUNE 14, 2021 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilwoman Schubert, and Councilman McDonald. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Campion. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Jake Foster, Assistant City Manager; Kelly Strey, Finance Director. PUBLIC PRESENT: None. DISCUSS MONTHLY UTILITY BILLING, LOCKBOX, AND BILL PRINT CONCEPTS • Asking the Council to increase the service level from quarterly to monthly utility billing. • Kelly gave an overview of the history of utility billing . • Noted big difference is the access to data that we have – no longer have to go out and physically read meters. • Have about 9,000 accounts . • Commercial accounts are already read monthly. • We do offer some residential accounts a monthly billing option, requires ACH payment. • We do bill each month – but only 1/3 of accounts each month. Therefore, not everyone is on the same quarter. We read in the middle of the month. • As an example, a toilet leaks in February – the resident gets the bill for that as late as May or June. Kelly shared an anecdote of a resident calling and asking what is the city’s plan to share the data we have in a timelier manner. • Monthly utility billing is a more proactive approach – allows people to find problems and adjust behavior based on their bill if they so choose. • About 40% of our comparable cities offer monthly billing. • Current finance staffing levels are below all other comp cities by at least 1.0 FTE. • Advantages from customer perspective – more predictable bill, fairness of new rates being implemented at the same time, sewer charge being calculated on same months for every account. • Advantages from a city perspective – tie back to our values and priorities. Protect environmental resources, prolong life of infrastructure, improves cash flow and internal controls. • Strey reviewed list of “what we would need” to move to monthly billing. • Staff would be able to be more proactive – for example, contact residents about possible leaks or high usage. • We would move from in-house bill printing to a bill printing service. Those companies get better rates on postage, so there is some volume savings. City Council Work Session Minutes – June 14, 2021 2 • A lockbox cash receipt system would have customers mail their payments to a bank that would process. Staff is also examining an on-site high speed scanner for bill processing. • Councilmember Schubert inquired about the percent of accounts still paying by check. Staff estimated it is about 50% of people using auto-bill pay. The most efficient payment is by ACH. • Strey reviewed the estimated cost of moving to monthly billing – approximately $2/month per account. The actual utility increase would be set through the budget process. • Mayor Ryan inquired about the proposal to move the utility rate study in house. Strey responded that we have the expertise to do the annual review in house and the new fund accountant would provide additional bandwidth. Strey spoke with Ehlers and they said every 2-5 years has become the average. The city would still plan to utilize Ehlers every five years. • Mayor Ryan noted that she appreciated including the use of consultants in the appropriate ways as part of the overall evaluation. • Strey explained in more detail how bill pay and lockbox services work. • Strey reviewed the implementation timeline. The soonest possible implementation would be Q1 of 2022. This date will also depend on the actual schedule of the water meter replacement project authorized at the last Council meeting. • Mayor Ryan thanked Strey for the presentation and opened the floor to questions. • Councilmember Rehm thanked Strey for tying presentation to Strategic Plan goals. She expressed not liking to charge residents more, but appreciated the enhancements of the proposal. She thought residents would appreciate not getting large, unexpected bills after the fact. • Councilmember McDonald appreciated the improvement in cash flow and asked more information on the proposed FTE. Strey replied that if hired in 2021, the FTE would be funded by fund balance. Rates would not increase until 2022. Strey shared that the fund balance is adequate if Council chooses to proceed. Councilman McDonald asked how long it would take to fill the positon. Strey replied at least six weeks. McDonald said he was generally in favor of moving forward with the proposal. He noted he has general concerns about staffing levels for the city overall. • Strey noted that the general fund currently supports overhead expenses for the water and sewer fund. Staff will be bringing more information about allocating expenses to the appropriate funds during the budget process. • Councilmember Schubert noted that she was in favor of monthly billing, but asked when Strey would request additional FTE if we did not elect to move to monthly billing. Strey responded that the need for the FTE exists regardless of this proposal, particularly to bolster internal controls, and review functions. Councilmember Shubert requested that all aspects of need for FTE be conveyed to residents if we make this move. • Council asked additional questions about other needs and priorities and asked Strey to confirm moving forward with this proposal is the best priority project right now. • Mayor Ryan clarified that we would still plan the annual increase proposed in the rate study. Strey confirmed yes, but the additional increase would only occur in one year. • Councilmember Rehm asked for more details on how leak detection occurs and noted that it would be a good added service to residents/accounts. • Mayor Ryan asked for an update on the timeline for the meter replacement. Howley shared that we are working on final project and schedule details. We do not have a completion date set at this time. City Council Work Session Minutes – June 14, 2021 3 • The Council expressed unanimous support for moving forward with the project. ROUNDTABLE • Mayor Ryan noted that the roundtable is a new concept, designed for council to be able to talk about ideas that Interim City Manager Johnston suggested. • Mayor Ryan requested that in the future items be submitted to the City Manager ahead of time if possible to give other members time to consider and review as well as to plan the amount of time needed. • Councilmember Rehm shared an idea to develop a proclamation schedule similar to the City of Roseville. She noted that she liked the idea of setting a schedule and communicating around the themes. Hokkanen shared an overview of current practice – using proclamations narrowly for city events/people. Mayor Ryan shared her preference that proclamation use be kept narrow and avoid partisan issues. Councilmember Rehm and discussed best ways to bring awareness and attention to issues and to be able to plan ahead. Councilmember McDonald shared the desire to keep current practices. • Councilmember Rehm also shared an idea of doing a cultural and historical study of the city every twenty years. The goal would be to be aware of and preserve the history of our town. Identifying places of cultural and historical significance would build community. Would be good to know the history of our land. Mayor Ryan noted that the City recently leased the Old Village Hall to the Historical Society and suggested them as a possible partner to take on such work. Councilmember McDonald was supportive of the Historical Society being involved and hoped that now that they have their own space, they will be able to take on new projects. • Councilmember Rehm also asked when we will discuss the ARPA funds. Strey responded that we are building into the budget process, also we have until 2024 to expend the funds so it is not the same pressure situation as CARES. Strey shared that our funding is about $2.7M, compared to the original estimate of $3M. Hokkanen committed that we will make sure dollars are all used in Chanhassen by the deadline. • Councilmember Schubert asked if we can do an update to residents about the impact of franchise fees on road projects. Staff noted that this the first year franchise years have been utilized, but committed to sharing that info with Council and the public. The meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 14, 2021 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Rehm, Councilwoman Schubert, and Councilman McDonald. COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Campion. STAFF PRESENT: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; Jake Foster, Assistant City M anager; and Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer. Mayor Ryan asked the City Council if there were any modifications or additions to the agenda. There were no changes to the published agenda. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Schubert seconded, that the City Council approve the following Consent Agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated May 24, 2021 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated May 18, 2021 3. Receive Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated April 27, 2021 4. Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated April 23, 2021 5. Approve Claims Paid 06-14-2021 6. Approve Consultant Contract Amendment for the Highway 101 Improvements (Pioneer Trail to Flying Cloud Drive) 7. Resolution 2021-27: Authorize Participation in State Performance Measures Program 8. Approve 2021 Stormwater Pond Management Project Contract Amendment 9. Approve 2021 4th of July Memorandum of Understanding with Rotary Club of Chanhassen All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. 1. Senator David Osmek City Council Minutes – June 14, 2021 2 Senator Osmek is glad to be with the City Council in person and said after 12-14 months of Zoom, legislators are getting tired. He noted it has made legislating more difficult, although more convenient. He said they just opened the first special session and will complete 14 bills before July 1, 2021 for the funding of the State that were not completed in the regular session. Senator Osmek has some new legislative assignments; he is still on Transportation, is part of State Government, the sub-committee for Technology, and is the Chair of the sub-committee on Metropolitan Governance. He has previously talked about how he has tried to impress upon the State legislators that they need to have accountability for Met Council representatives. One of his proposals was a referendum that before Met Council appointments can be ratified by the Senate, they would have to get letters of support from at least 50% of the City Councils that they would be representing. Senator Osmek updated the Council on the omnibus bills coming up, including a Transportation bill and Senate file 519 which helps those coming out of incarceration and back into society. He noted many times those in prison lose track of where their social security card is, their driver’s license has expired, and they do not have documentation needed to get a job. This bill is a checklist for the Department of Corrections so these people can be prepared and do not go back into custody. Senator Osmek’s goal is to make all of these people taxpayers and productive citizens helping everyone in Minnesota. Councilman McDonald thanked Senator Osmek for his service and noted they had a Suburban Transit Authority (STA) meeting earlier in the day and Mr. Osmek’s name came up; he actually put a bill together to put Met Council’s feet to the fire regarding the allocation of the federal funds. The Met Council has not really embraced any of this, but have agreed they will follow those formulas and now the problem is getting the money out of them. He appreciates Senator Osmek’s work on it as the suburban transit entities would never have seen any of this phase 2 and 3 federal money. Councilwoman Rehm knows people who ride on Metro Mobility and the system is so outdated, there is inability to quickly call and get a ride, and then it takes a long time to be picked up. She heard rumors that they were going to cut funding to Metro Mobility and asked if that is true and if there is a plan to replace it for those who are unable to drive. Senator Osmek replied there has been a lot of federal funding that has sloshed into the State for recovery money, and Met Council already has a lot of money invested in Metro Mobility in the short term. He believes there is a reduction being proposed on State funds because they have enough money to maintain it. One thing to remember regarding Metro Mobility is that it is a federally required service that must be provided. In reducing the money in the omnibus bill coming forward it is not because they are reducing services but because there are fully funded pots of money to use in the short term for Metro Mobility. In the long term there will also have to be additional money put in. Senator Osmek said if there are people who are having issues with Metro Mobility, they should be directed to their State Senator, and in Chanhassen that would be either himself or Senator Coleman. In Shorewood, Excelsior, and those areas, that is also Senator Osmek. Legislators should be contacted because that type of feedback is important to Met Council to know that there may be an issue someplace in their transportation system. He clarified City Council Minutes – June 14, 2021 3 for legislators, emails are the best way to get in touch with them as his come right to his cell phone. Mayor Ryan seconded the appreciation for Senator Osmek’s service, and thanked him for his constant communication during COVID-19. She asked regarding the Minnetonka Middle School West (MMW) roundabout, how do they get that to stick? Senator Osmek noted there is not much they can do right now as from the Senate side the only way it does not stay within the transportation budget is if they take all of the member projects out, in which case it would go into the bonding bill in the following year which is more traditionally where they have these. He stated that because they have a lot of federal money, they are trying to use some cash to do some of the member request projects faster than using the bonding bill. Mayor Ryan said obviously it has already been money spent by the City so it would be nice to see the follow through on the back end. From a technology standpoint, Mayor Ryan asked what issues Senator Osmek is specifically addressing. Senator Osmek replied the Technology Committee was more focused on technology and innovation at the State level, not necessarily specific to the local level. From a broadband infrastructure perspective, they continue to invest in border-to-border broadband; unfortunately, Chanhassen tends to be one of the overlooked communities as they may have some service but they are trying to focus on the “unserved” areas. Especially with COVID happening and distance learning they found out in painful ways that there is not much connectivity out into the rural areas. Mayor Ryan stated that Governor Walz’s emergency powers were extended again earlier that day. She knows there are a lot of reasons and asked if there is a specific negotiation taking place? She is curious on Senator Osmek’s perspective and what is the ultimate goal so the legislature starts working together again. Senator Osmek’s hope is that the Governor is going to rescind those powers; he is down to a few active orders underneath the emergency order powers right now. Today, Senator Osmek signed a bill similar to Senate File 4 which was changing the way the emergency powers work and that passed the Senate floor in March. He explained right now for the emergency powers to extend it takes a vote from the House and the Senate to rescind them; his bill flips it and says in order for them to extend it, they must be actual participants and vote to allow them to extend the emergency powers beyond the first 30 days. Therefore, it changes from being passive to being active and brings in the co-equal branches of government working together. He explained that they all agreed during the first two months of the emergency orders but after that the emergency – in Senator Osmek’s opinion – became less an emergency and more a power grab from the Executive Branch. He believes emergency powers are at times necessary but need to be constrained. City Council Minutes – June 14, 2021 4 Councilwoman Rehm said with things getting back to normal, does Senator Osmek anticipate a Town Hall any time soon? Senator Osmek found that Town Halls are not terribly effective as it turns into a large group of the opposite political persuasion coming in and turning it into chaos. He did Town Halls in 2013 and now does City Hall meetings, such as he is doing today, and makes himself available to the cities in that way. He takes questions from the cities, from those in the audience, and afterwards talks to people about issues they might have. He noted Town Halls have become far too partisan to be valuable. A Mr. Titus approached the podium and stated he thinks Mr. McDonald and Ms. Ryan were on the City Council in March 2018 when he submitted a questionnaire for use for the Senior Committee. The intent is for the Senior Committee to establish a dialogue with its market. For three years it has been ignored and Mr. Titus is very disappointed; he stated he will leave a copy with the City Council. Second, he will leave a letter he wrote to Todd Gerhardt dated May 12, 2020 which says an article in the Chanhassen paper notes that Council has approved the density of a property adjacent to Lake Ann Park and about two miles from Mr. Titus’ home from low to high to accommodate new construction of a memory care facility (Moments of Chanhassen). He does not know the status for that project now but he wants to find out more about whether the design for this facility would include for isolating people. He noted they were in the midst of the pandemic then and it was an important topic. NEW BUSINESS Ordinance 672: Approve an Amendment to Chapter 20, Zoning, Concerning Mobile Food Vending (Food Trucks) City Manager Hokkanen shared her screen and said the idea to take another look at the mobile vending ordinance originated through a Citizen Action Request Form by the owners of the Chanhassen Brewery. They stated that the current ordinance would be too restrictive to allow them to do what they hope in supporting their business through the use of food trucks. Staff began the process of reviewing current City Code and took a two-pronged approach being reviewed by both the Economic Development Commission (EDC) and the Planning Commission. They heard from the very beginning that Council and Staff wanted to be sure they specifically heard from local restaurants and the local business community. They hand-delivered a flyer to all Chanhassen restaurants and took out an ad in the Chanhassen Villager letting people know that they could provide public comment at the May 11 EDC meeting. The proposal before the Council tonight looks at how they can make what the community is interested in happen and how do they become more of a “yes, we’re open to that idea.” The ordinance tonight eliminates the need for a special event permit in order to have a food truck, so there would be no limits on the number of food trucks that a business or neighborhood could host over the course of a year. Considerations included parking, licensing, regulations through the State, and Staff is proposing that there would not be a fee paid to the City of Chanhassen in order to have a food truck. It City Council Minutes – June 14, 2021 5 would require the approval of the private property owner and food trucks would only be allowed on City streets or City parks through the issuance of a special event permit. Generalizing the public feedback from the EDC, Ms. Hokkanen said the majority of people are very much in favor of this change, but there were business concerns about the impacts of COVID and there were still concerns about the impact on brick and mortar businesses within Chanhassen. Councilman McDonald noted two issues that bother him. In general, he is all for the food trucks and thinks that would be great. The first issue is there are no time limits as previously they could have so many special events and he does not want this every weekend. He believes a food truck operates at a much higher advantage that a brick and mortar store can operate at. Second, he noted they are not charging for a permit. They charge permits for businesses in town and he thinks everyone should be operating on as close to a level playing field as possible. Councilwoman Schubert agrees with Councilman McDonald in that their brick and mortars do need a little more time to recover, yet food truck season is upon them. She is still a little torn as she does love going to food trucks and many times people go to breweries because they follow a certain food truck. That will bring people into Chanhassen, as well. Mayor Ryan asked regarding fees or permits, does she understand it is split in other communities in terms of who is requiring and who is not. She asked, is it a fee for businesses or will a resident hosting a graduation party need to have a permit fee? Ms. Hokkanen said Staff found that cities have fees that range from $0-$150 per year; there are also per-occasion fees. She noted they considered the idea of having a fee but there were a couple things considered before ultimately recommending that they do not have a fee. First is the communication with food trucks as some are booked directly by private residents and others are booked by businesses: would there be a uniform application of the fee that would not cost more in Staff time to inform and regulate that it would to actually collect. Second, they were approaching this as something that had been requested by a business and in other cities with fewer food truck restrictions; they generally heard a very positive experience. Food trucks are generally in a location for a low volume of time such as 3-6 hours. Ms. Hokkanen noted they can make changes and put it on the radar for evaluation. Mayor Ryan is very excited about food trucks, it has been brought forward multiple times and has not had a lot of movement. It ultimately made progress because it was brought forward by a business owner through the Community Action Request Form. It went through both Commissions and was supported there with unanimous vote and in outreach they had the majority support of businesses. With the recent strategic planning where they talked about being open to making some movement as a Council and a City on some new ideas, she does not think the streets will be lined with food trucks but rather will be one-offs with some businesses here or there. Mayor Ryan’s understanding is that it would be more for special events and she noted the City can encourage more people to come in to town if they host food trucks at, for example, the City Council Minutes – June 14, 2021 6 Summer Concert Series. She likes the idea of a review at the end of the year to see what feedback has been. Councilwoman Rehm is generally in favor of this, although at the beginning she was a bit concerned because she does want to support local businesses and restaurants and did not want them to be hurt by adding food trucks. It has been argued that adding more opportunities and food options for people coming into the City will actually bring more business to the restaurants in the area. When she goes out with family or friends, they look for areas where they can find a variety of food because often, they go out to more than one restaurant. She is generally in favor of this and they may want to tweak it a bit now or try it out this year and look at it next year. Ultimately, she thinks this will be good for the City as it will bring more people into Chanhassen. She noted it seemed like most of the restaurants in the City were generally in favor. Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilwoman Rehm seconded, that the City Council adopt the Mobile Food Vending Food Truck Ordinance. Mayor Ryan would like to make a note before the vote to do a review at the end of the year. The motion carried with a vote of 3 to 1. Councilman McDonald voted nay. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan shared that over the past couple of weeks she and Ms. Hokkanen have been doing a “road tour” with the strategic plan. They have visited all of the Commissions except for the Senior Commission and they will meet with them in July. It has been great to share the strategic plan and receive questions and they have had great conversations and engagement. Mayor Ryan also thanked Ms. Hokkanen for conducting Insights Discovery with Staff to learn about one another’s personalities and habits. She congratulated graduating students and noted it has been a challenging school year and thanked teachers and administrators. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Ms. Hokkanen updated the City Council on the MetroNet Franchise agreement and said they are still working on it but do not have a date yet. She shared a picture of the Insight Discovery workshop and noted it is a great team-building and culture-building exercise that gives people a common language and gives communicating a common shorthand. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. 1. Letter from Metropolitan Council dated May 27, 2021 2. 2021 Building Permit Activity May Year-To-Date City Council Minutes – June 14, 2021 7 ADJOURNMENT. Councilwoman Schubert moved, Councilman McDonald seconded, to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:59 p.m. Submitted by Laurie Hokkanen City Manager Prepared by Kim Meuwissen CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated June 1, 2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2. Prepared By Jean Steckling, Senior Admin. Support Specialist File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated June 1, 2021.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Minutes dated June 1, 2021 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steven Weick, Laura Skistad, Eric Noyes, Mark von Oven, Doug Reeder, and Kelsey Alto. MEMBERS ABSENT: Erik Johnson. STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager; and Elise Ryan, Mayor. PUBLIC PRESENT: None. Chairman Weick reviewed guidelines for conducting the virtual Planning Commission meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 20, ZONING, CONCERNING MOBILE FOOD VENDING (FOOD TRUCKS) Community Development Director Aanenson presented the staff report on this item, noting the city is proposing a food truck in all zoning districts; this is a change from how they are currently operated under a special event permit which limits the number of days food trucks can be used. The item went before the City Council and staff put together an ordinance, took it to the Economic Development Commission (EDC), and an ad was put in the newspaper with feedback received from the public, particularly restaurant owners concerned about the timing, however, there was also support for the use itself. This would allow a food truck on private property. For example, if someone was having a birthday party or a graduation party, they could park the food truck in their driveway with standards outlined in the proposed draft ordinance. Special Event Permits will remain the same, but the food truck ordinance will allow food trucks more opportunities to be in the city without the requirement of a Special Event Permit. A property owner would be able to request a food truck come to their property, such as for an employee appreciation day. Chairman Weick noted food trucks are not restricted but they must have Department of Health licenses/permits and things like that. Ms. Aanenson replied yes there are regulations such as their own licensing, their own insurance, and the like. Chairman Weick asked to clarify item I) the vendor location shall be located on an impervious surface unless circumstances prohibit the operation to be located on a pervious surface. Planning Commission Minutes – June 1, 2021 2 Ms. Aanenson stated this is something they should do some wordsmithing on. The intent is that if the truck is parked on a hard surface rather than grass, especially if it is part of the public property, landscaping, etc. Commissioner Noyes thinks the concept of having food trucks in the city is great. It provides opportunities and variety. His one concern is more related to timing as they are coming out of the pandemic and there are a lot of great restaurants in the city that have struggled through closures and shutdowns. He is worried if this is passed and effective immediately that there will be food trucks that are very well established coming in and winning business, and wonders if a delay would allow Chanhassen-based restaurants to consider and determine whether they ultimately want to get into the food truck business, as well. Ms. Aanenson noted staff also had those concerns which is why they went to the EDC, noticed all businesses in town with a flyer, and put a publication in the paper as they wanted the input. There were some comments with the same concern. Ms. Aanenson noted if one is a tenant rather than a landlord, it would be incumbent that the landlord would have to give permission and if some of the tenants do not want that competition, it would temper the issue somewhat. Tenants (in a strip mall, for example) have the ability to say they do not want that direct competition. Mr. Noyes wondered if they can focus on somewhat of a “preferred vendor” list. If one wanted a food truck in the next six months, Chanhassen-based businesses may be called first. After a certain date, entities outside of Chanhassen would have access to a similar set of opportunities. Commissioner Skistad was really pleased at the way the city went forward as many of the lists were barriers to business. It typically costs $28,000 to enter into business in fees. She would like to be part of the group that encourages this and encourages variety, because in looking at a food truck one is looking for something unique and special to bring in for a one-time event. She noted they do not want to cause barriers for those interested in a one-time event. Commissioner von Oven asked if there is a threshold that determines when something goes from just having a food truck to a special event with 10 food trucks. Ms. Aanenson replied that this would be regulated by the parking being taken up when the food truck is there. If they are blocking traffic or there is not enough parking, the city would come out and tell them that is too much. She believes they could anticipate accommodating two food trucks at a time; if it was for a private business as opposed to a commercial site where there may be additional parking that will probably be the driver. Commissioner Reeder has lived in a lot of places where the ice cream truck would come around and his kids would beg for ice cream. He asked if those are still allowed. Ms. Aanenson stated no. These trucks would be stationary and are not allowed to be serviced on public streets or city parking lots. Planning Commission Minutes – June 1, 2021 3 Commissioner Alto said to Commissioner Skistad’s point, for established food trucks in the city she would not think she is going to a Chanhassen restaurant versus a food truck – if she is going to a food truck it is because she wanted to go to the food truck, even if it is parked in Minneapolis. It would allow people from other communities to come to Chanhassen because it is parked here for the day. Ms. Aanenson noted that was also a thought. If a food truck comes out and finds enough interest and a market in Chanhassen, they may want to open up a permanent store. The city is hoping this happens. Chairman Weick opened the public hearing. There being no one to speak to this issue, Chairman Weick closed the public hearing. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner von Oven seconded, that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the Mobile Food Vending (Food Truck) ordinance with the modification regarding impervious surface. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. This item will go before the City Council on June 14, 2021. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED MAY 18, 2021. Commissioner Noyes noted the summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated May 18, 2021, as presented. Ms. Aanenson stated there is a meeting scheduled on June 15 and they were going to have a subdivision during that meeting but the applicant has asked it be moved. They typically do not have a meeting around July 5 because it is difficult to get a quorum; this item is moved to July 20, 2021. She clarified there are three items on the agenda for June 15, 2021. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: 1. CITY MANAGER & MAYOR / STRATEGIC PLAN Mayor Ryan said on behalf of the City Council, they really appreciate the Commissioners’ service to Chanhassen and the amount of time, effort, and review that goes into their decisions and recommendations. She outlined the 2021-2024 Strategic Plan, noting they hired a consultant, the Council and staff did a questionnaire, performed a SWOT analysis and compiled all the information. City Council and department heads got together on a two-day retreat and talked about what was important for the community and worked together to put together a mission, values, and vision. This provides a roadmap for moving forward with the strategic plan. It is a living document and will continue to evolve over the years. Planning Commission Minutes – June 1, 2021 4 City Manager Hokkanen gave a presentation to the Commission. She walked them through the city’s mission, vision, and values, including being a Community for Life. They are looking for a Communications Manager to be dedicated to telling Chanhassen’s story, and also engaging and informing the community. The strategic plan summary is as follows: 1. Financial Sustainability 2. Asset Management 3. Development and Redevelopment 4. Operational Excellence 5. Communications Specifically, Ms. Hokkanen spoke about development and redevelopment, noting especially as there is not a lot of green field development, redevelopment is important to keep people in Chanhassen, to have amenities they want, and how to redevelop in keeping with the vision of the city. She spoke about the value having new innovative places and spaces. Staff is working on a website using a third-party software (Envisio) that will help make this really understandable for business owners, the public, and anyone interested in following along in the project. Chairman Weick asked how the strategic plan intertwines with the Comprehensive Plan. Do they work together or in parallel? Mayor Ryan replied they work in parallel as they are different documents. This incorporates the Comprehensive Plan and goes along the same line. She stated when something comes before the Commission, the department heads have started to align or layout the strategic priority they are talking about when introducing a concept as they want to make that connection every time. Commissioner Noyes said as new projects are brought to the city, with terms like diversity and innovation, will they be “scored” at the beginning of the process or will that come into the Planning Commission and City Council further down the process? Will it remain relatively similar as it has been so far? Ms. Aanenson replied the challenge will be if a project is asking for assistance from the city. The city will ask “is this innovative?” or “what are we getting out of this project?” Depending on the project, they always encourage lead-certified projects, green-built things, and that is what they would be looking for innovation-wise. They may also work with the EDC for some assistance to help get those diversity projects. They may also work through creative stormwater management, and other types of environmental or preservation things. Commissioner Noyes asked if those would be criteria to reject a project. Ms. Aanenson said that would be something they would have to put in the ordinance; as they move along and work through the process that may be something the Commission recommends to the Council. Ms. Hokkanen noted it may depend on what level of discretion they are talking about. If it is straight zoning that meets Code then the Strategic Plan will be a factor but much smaller. She Planning Commission Minutes – June 1, 2021 5 said they are sort of setting a new stage or signaling that they are really open to things. Cities have reputations and developers know that if they have a plan that does not meet Code, they will not even approach certain cities. She clarified that is what she means by saying they are signaling that if there is an innovative idea, the Planning Commission, City Council, Mayor, and staff want to hear about it. It may not work in the end but they will work hard to explore it. Commissioner von Oven thinks the reason strategic plans are written and then die are because someone thinks it is someone else’s job to make it come to life. The fact that Mayor Ryan and Ms. Hokkanen are here sharing it lets him know the Planning Commission has a role to play. Chairman Weick noted there are some pretty specific targets in the plan and asked if they envision staff or Councilmembers will own certain areas so they are talking about those targets. Ms. Hokkanen replied each strategic initiative will have a staff owner and when they roll out the Envisio software, it is a color-coded system which will help them to understand delays or if criteria are not being met. Mayor Ryan said having this plan will allow the Council to focus on the bigger picture, strategic objectives where department heads are executing on those objectives with specific tasks and day- to-day operations of the city. Commissioner Skistad asked what is meant by public/private partnerships and if they could expand on that. Ms. Hokkanen replied the city does not have the resources, capacity, or even the interest in doing a lot of the things they would be interested in seeing happen on their own. She said they ask what are the resources the city can bring to the table? Perhaps financial incentives such as tax increment funding (TIF) or speed of processing. They recognize they will not bring everything to the table but they would at least like to talk about whether a partnership is possible. Mayor Ryan agreed it is really opening the door for those conversations. That is what they are trying to communicate to developers and residents; that the city is ready and willing to listen to ideas and opportunities. Commissioner Skistad stated there are businesses that will not come to Chanhassen because there is a barrier of entry for the smaller businesses. She asked if they are opening it up to those businesses that might be interested so they can understand those barriers. Ms. Hokkanen replied, yes, she thinks they would all like to hear about what those barriers are; perhaps after investigation they will see the reason why certain rules are in place or they may find that things have changed since a rule was put in place 20 years ago. Commissioner Reeder asked about diversity in new development and what that means. Ms. Hokkanen said in this iteration of the plan, it speaks to the type of development. Town homes, single-family homes, affordable homes, million dollar homes, office projects, Planning Commission Minutes – June 1, 2021 6 retail…they do not ever want to find themselves only doing one type of development. They pride themselves on being a well-rounded community where everything one needs is within the boundary and they are committed to making space for all of the developments listed. Commissioner Reeder asked if all of the development coming into the city was high-priced; does that mean they would try to change that? Ms. Hokkanen does not know about “change” but it would help them be aware of it. She pointed out Item 2 where they talk about private/public partnerships and working with the Community Development Agency (CDA); implied is that they will actively work to make sure they do not just build $1,500,000 homes from here on out. She noted they did not get into that level of detail with targets around what the development would look like. Commissioner Noyes asked, as this is a living document, if they see those details becoming part of this and will get more specific on some of those targets? Or will it stay fairly high-level? Ms. Hokkanen said in her experience they get more specific over time as things are accomplished and they become familiar with what the goals are. Some of it will depend on progress made, continuity in the Council, things that come up that are not expected, etc. Mayor Ryan stated it depends on the five strategic priorities as they were based on the current Council and staff. They will look at those objectives on a regular basis and things could change as priorities and staff change – the document will continue to evolve. Commissioner Skistad noted in the last year with delivery trucks, the roads are getting quite beat up. She asked how they will deal with that in regards to stewardship. Ms. Hokkanen noted that is a priority they have known about – infrastructure and roads in particular - are in need of maintenance. A big part of this plan is developing a long-term funding plan for the entire infrastructure including roads, which are a big priority. This Council has said they need to have a long-term funding strategy; historically the city has had a focus on being as fiscally conservative as possible and looking 1-2 years out at what the most pressing needs are and spending as little money as possible has frequently been a number one driver. She stated that has been a valid approach but where they are at right now, they want to look 5-10 or 15-20 years on the horizon and look at the needs and the level of service they want to pay for and fund so they can hold themselves accountable. In the next 12-18 months they will work on the proper level of service, what is the target, and how fast are they willing or want to get there? Mayor Ryan said, to be very blunt, people are ready to start investing in the city again. Whether infrastructure or facilities, a component of the strategic plan is a long-term financial plan so they are not just planning 1-2 years out but have a better understanding of the most urgent and pressing needs but also what investment in some of the amenities or facilities would need. They are planning to start reinvesting in the City of Chanhassen as it puts them on a path to success in the long term. Planning Commission Minutes – June 1, 2021 7 CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE: Ms. Aanenson updated the Commission that grading will be starting on the Avienda site and there was a ground-breaking of the senior housing project (Lakes at Chanhassen). ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner von Oven moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:03 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated May 21, 2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Senior Commission meeting minutes dated May 21, 2021.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes 1 CHANHASSEN SENIOR COMMISSION MINUTES May 21, 2021 MEMBERS PRESENT: Jerry Cerchia, Bhakti Modi, Ruth Lunde, Lisa Lyon, Linda Haight, Jim Camarata, Susan Kibler. MEMBERS ABSENT: Dorina Tipton STAFF PRESENT: Sharmeen Al-Jaff. GUESTS PRESENT: Dawn Plumer, Jake Simich, Marketing/Public Relations Administrator and John Haggenmiller, Marketing and Public Outreach Manager with SouthWest Transit, and Katie Boller Gosewisch, Executive Director with WeCAB. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Commissioner Camarata moved to approve the Agenda. Commissioner Lunde seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. SENIOR COMMISSION MINUTES: Commissioner Lyon moved to approve the minutes. Commissioner Lunde seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. GUEST SPEAKER JAKE SIMICH, MARKETING SPECIALIST- JOHN HAGGENMILLER, MARKETING & PUBLIC OUTREACH MANAGER UPDATE – SW TRANSIT See attached Power Point Presentation GUEST SPEAKER KATIE BOLLER GOSEWISCH, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - UPDATE—WECAB See attached Flyer HOUSING INITIATIVE DISCUSSION: The Commission elected to postpone this item to the June meeting. FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN UPDATE: Commissioner Haight and Chairman Cerchia visited the site. The commission considered volunteering to package food for the organization. No final decisions were made. MEMORIAL DAY UPDATE-MONDAY, MAY 31, 2021 Chairman Cerchia and Commissioner Kibler will volunteer at the Memorial Day event to raise funds for the Veterans Court. Staff prepared all the posters and the details associated with the day of the event were in progress. MAY 27, PANEL DISCUSSION. KNOW THE VACCINATION FACTS-HOSTS NEEDED. Commissioners Modi and Camarata agreed to be part of an event to share their experience. Chanhassen Senior Commission Minutes – May 21, 2021 2 WEDNESDAYS – COFFEE AND ROLLS ON THE PLAZA, 9-10 AM-HOSTS NEEDED Staff explained that volunteers were needed for the month of July. Most of the dates were filled by members of the Senior Advisory Board and Commissioner Kibler. SENIOR COMMISSION COMMENTS: None ADJOURNMENT: Chairman Cerchia called for meeting adjournment. Commissioner Lyon move to adjourn; Commissioner Modi seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the motion carried. Prepared and submitted by Sharmeen Al-Jaff SouthWest Transit Update Commuter Services May 20, 2021 SouthWest Transit (SWT) Overview Public transit provider for Eden Prairie, Chaska, Chanhassen, as well as Carver and Victoria (contracts). Governed by a commission consisting of six individuals appointed by the member cities and one rider representative. Suburban provider established by State Legislative action in 1983 due to the fact that the existing structure was not responsive or meeting the needs of the growing suburbs. SWT was formed in 1986. Pre-COVID: Operated over approximately 160 trips per day with 75 buses. Major routes bring commuters to Downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota. National leader in innovation, technology, and transit-oriented development. Introduced one of the nation's first microtransit operations –SW Prime Provider of choice to many special events. Has over $60 million in assets. Pre-COVID: Annually provided over 1.2 million rides. COVID-19 Impacts Transit as an industry hit hard by the impact of COVID-19. SWT hit harder than most do the makeup of our customer base –“Choice Riders.” Impacts/Actions Initially lost over 90% of our riders and a similar percentage of farebox revenue. Furloughed or eliminated over 50% of our workforce. Reduced service by over 60%. Received two rounds of Federal Stimulus Funding. Took numerous safety measures to increase customer and employee confidence (mask mandate, passenger/driver separators, air purification systems, etc.). Continuing Plan to Address COVID-19 Continue reduced service with the plan to add back trips to meet any increased demand as we come out of the pandemic. Targeting Labor Day for substantial service increases. Continue high level cleaning/disinfecting vehicles and facilities. Swapping out vehicles multiple times per day. Maintain daily employee health screening. Continue to make the wearing of masks mandatory in our facilities and on our vehicles. This is a Federal mandate in effect until mid-September. Self-perform versus contract (keep as many employed as possible). Goal : To give the agency the opportunity to meet all challenges and be financially solvent once we are able to put the coronavirus behind us. What’s Next After COVID? Build back express operations as Downtown/U of M reopens U of M back on campus in the Fall Downtown employers starting to return in Summer/Fall Explore new markets. Suburb-to-Suburb Services – Shakopee expansion completed 494/MOA/Airport –Service started April 2021 Opportunity to build back services smarter Create more efficient and attractive service schedules Better leverage microtransit capabilities –First Mile/Last Mile What’s Next After COVID Cont.? Resume Special Event services Trips will require reservations to start State Fair –Planning for full service Sporting Events Twins Express resuming June 8th Concerts Pilot evolving technologies Mobility as a Service (MaaS) Electric Vehicles Autonomous Vehicles What’s Next? – SW Prime/Prime MD Expansion Expanded SW Prime and SW Prime MD services. Expanded SW Prime hours of service June 7th –Service to start earlier (5:30am) Service into evening hours being planned Expansion into Shakopee (up and running) Canterbury Park, Valleyfair, Mystic Lake MVTA service connections Expansion of SW Prime MD Locations Serviced Methodist Hospital Park Nicollet Clinics in St. Louis Park 494 Corridor Expansion MSP Airport Mall of America Entire corridor between Eden Prairie and MOA What’s Next? – 494 Service Regional Solicitation grant awarded in 2016 for 3-year demonstration service. Provides for service between SouthWest Station and Mall of America. Award amended in 2020 to include service to MSP Airport. Service scheduled to start in 2022. Limited on-demand service already in operation. Primary Service Locations: SouthWestStation, Mall of America, MSP Airport, Normandale Community College, Orange Line BRT, France Ave, Lyndale Ave, and others. Weekdays and Saturdays. SWLRT & SouthWest Transit 3.5-year negotiation process. Final agreement adopted in December of 2017. Results of the agreement met the needs of both SWT and the Met Council. SouthWest Station site is being redesigned to support existing SWT bus operations and LRT. Ultimately, the LRT operations will open up new service opportunities for SWT. Improve service efficiencies for mid-day, evening, weekend, and special event services. Improved first mile/last mile connections via SW Prime. What’s Next? – SouthWest Station Mobility Hub Regional Solicitation Grant awarded in 2018 for 3-year demonstration service. Planned Implementation: 2024 to coincide with SWLRT start of operations. Focuses on providing a high level of first mile/last mile multi-modal connectivity centered around the SouthWest Station SWLRT station. Consists of: Additional SW Prime microtransit service. Providing eBike and/or eScootersharing. 5 Carsharing vehicles. Other mobility solutions as they evolve. What’s Next? –Golden Triangle Autonomous Demonstration Eden Prairie’s Golden Triangle Area (GTA) Largest Suburban Business Park in the Twin Cities Metro Area 20,000+ Jobs 9.8 million sqft. of office, commercial, and industrial property. Accounts for 9% of all office/industrial space in the Twin Cities Increased employment density anticipated with SWLRT Large Employers: Optum, 3M, Starkey Labs, iMedia, Cigna, Lifetouch Studios Majority of jobs outside of ¼-mile buffer of planned SWLRT stations Currently in discussions with multiple AV vendors/MnDOT/FTA about possible pilots. What’s Next? –Electric Vehicles & Autonomous SW Prime Contact Us Matt Fyten, COO SouthWest Transit mfyten@swtransit.org 952-974-3100 www.swtransit.org Employer Resources •Receive email updates about Southwest LRT from Commuter Services •Return to Work guidance •Bus pass programs –Metropass •Telework resources and training •Preferential carpool / vanpool parking management •Free outdoor bike rack •New hire packets, e-blasts, newsletter articles Commuter Resources •Customized transit itinerary + free ride passes •Transit Assistance Program (TAP) •Carpool, vanpool matching and tips •Bike-to-work materials and trail construction updates •Try It Campaigns •Sign up for monthly commuter newsletter •Guaranteed Ride Home NEW Twin Cities Telework website! www.tctelework.com Free resources for employers and teleworkers Contact Us Kate Meredith Commuter Services Kate@494corridor.org 952-405-9425 www.494corridor.org QUESTIONS CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Receive Environmental Commission Meeting Minutes dated May 12, 2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the May 12, 2021 Environmental Commission minutes.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes 1 Chanhassen Environmental Commission (EC) Regular Meeting 6:00 pm May 12, 2021 Members Present: Bill Chappell, Kristin Fulkerson, Jeff Harken, Greg Hawks, Scot Lacek, Leslie Elhadi. Members Absent: Markus Fischer Staff Present: Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Specialist Guests Present: Kim Erickson and Ashley Kennedy, Zero Waste West Metro Minutes: April minutes were approved. Guest presentation: Kim and Ashley presented on No Mow May. In a power point, they explained that there are 40 million acres of lawn in the US all of which are mowed, most of which are monocultures. This area of land could be used to benefit pollinators by allowing the plant height to be taller and more plant diversity to be introduced. The benefits of No Mow May include feeding pollinators in the early spring season when fewer flowering plants are available, saving natural resources such as fuel and water, benefitting birds during mating and nesting season. According to Kim and Ashley, a healthy lawn can be mowed once a month. They requested that the commission ask the City Council to pass an amendment to not enforce the lawn height restriction during the month of May next year. Discussion was had about the amount of lawn clippings once the lawn was mowed and Kim and Ashley offered that many cities hold a yard waste collection in June thereby allowing homeowners to get rid of excess lawn clippings. Discussion was also had about the parks participating and not mowing some areas during the month of May. The commission also talked about scheduling a public education piece every spring that addresses the top 10 environmentally friendly practices in a yard such as irrigation, mowing, etc. The commission will consider the request and decide on the course of action. They thanked Kim and Ashley for the informative presentation. Arbor Day summary: Jill updated the commission on the tree planting at Sugarbush Park on May 6 that was done as this year’s Arbor Day celebration. Volunteers from the MN Public Works Association helped to plant 15 trees. July 3 Business Expo: Jill shared that it was recently decided that all of the July 3 and 4 festivities are on for 2021! The commission wants a table at the expo. Jill will reserve it. Kristin, Jeff, Bill, Scot and Greg are available to volunteer that day. The commission will organize a ‘What To/Not To Recycle’ game. There will be 3 bins – Trash, Recycle, Compost – and visitors will be given a number of items to put into the bins. The items will be themed to real life scenarios such as out to eat and at home. Scot 2 says he has reusable tote bags to donate as prizes. Kristin will create a sign up genius to gather the items needed for the game. And maybe make a poster with recycling facts? Do you know your recycling? 2021 Recycling Education Ideas: Greg confirmed that the DemCon trailer is reserved for the fall education event. Jill will reserve the Rec Center. Also schedule the sandwich board signs for advertising. Could also have display at library with the ‘What is/isn’t recyclable’ and the videos. City Updates: • The City Council is in support of adding a youth member to the Environmental Commission. • The city is applying for additional recycling grant funds from Carver County. General Discussion: • Greg will send an update on watershed news. • Ramsey and Washington counties are setting up composting services for residents. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 pm Minutes prepared by Jill Sinclair CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated May 11, 2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Economic Development Commission minutes dated May 11, 2021.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MAY 11, 2021 Chairman Sanford called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Sanford, Kathleen Donovan, James Ebeling, Eric Anderson, and David Kressler MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Jake Foster, Assistant City Manager and Bob Generous, Senior Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Jessica Pettingill Cafe Thyme Matt Rosati Chanhassen Brewery James Gordon Dog Park Gourmet Hot Dogs Michele Harvet Resident Steve Zumbusch The Garden By The Woods Joor Schultz Soup du Joor Senior Planner Generous stated the discussion on the Strategic Plan would be postponed to the June meeting. A discussion on a feedback survey for businesses was added to the agenda. Member Anderson moved, Member Donovan seconded to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES APPROVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES DATED MARCH 9, 2021 AND APRIL 13, 2021 Member Donovan moved, Member Kressler seconded to approve the Minutes of the Economic Development Commission meetings dated March 9, 2021 and April 13, 2021 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR Chair Sanford explained to new Economic Development Commission members, Eric Anderson and David Kressler, that their terms would be one year longer than the current Commission Economic Development Commission – May 11 , 2021 2 Members. The Economic Development Commission bylaws must be approved each year and a Chair and Vice-Chair elected. Member Donovan moved, Chair Sanford seconded to appoint Eric Anderson as Chair of the Economic Development Commission. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Member Kressler moved, Member Donovan seconded to appoint James Ebeling as Vice- Chair of the Economic Development Commission. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. OLD BUSINESS. None. NEW BUSINESS. REVIEW FOOD TRUCK ORDINANCE Senior Planner Generous stated that the City had distributed flyers to local restaurants in Chanhassen asking for input on a proposed food truck ordinance amendment but had not received any response. Currently, the food truck ordinance does not allow food trucks on any public streets and they are only allowed as part of a temporary or special event. The proposed change would allow food trucks on any property, provided the owner has given permission, and the truck must be parked on an “improved surface”. The ordinance amendment was requested by Chanhassen Brewery. The ordinance was assembled from various other city ordinances pertaining to food trucks. Chair Anderson asked what the City is looking for from the Economic Development Commission. Mr. Generous asked the Commission to take a look at the ordinance and take comments from the public. The ordinance will go to the Planning Commission as part of a Public Hearing process where public comment will also be reviewed before it goes to the Council to approve or deny. Assistant City Manager Foster directed those who wanted to speak via Zoom. Jessica Pettingill, owner of Cafe Thyme, stated her business is two years old; however, they are recovering from loss of business due to COVID-19. She would like the City to wait 1-2 years before changing the food truck regulations until local Chanhassen businesses have been able to recover. Member Donovan asked Ms. Pettingill if the Chanhassen Brewery has discussed food sales with Cafe Thyme. Economic Development Commission – May 11 , 2021 3 Ms. Pettingill explained that they do not have a contract but have been providing delivery service to Chanhassen Brewery. Member Donovan asked Mr. Generous if other businesses have expressed a desire to have fewer regulations on food trucks. Mr. Generous stated that there have been calls from food trucks asking for Chanhassen licensing requirements but food trucks are currently only allowed as part of an event. Member Kressler asked Ms. Pettingill if she was concerned that she would experience a loss in business if food trucks were allowed more often. Ms. Pettingill felt that people would come to Chanhassen only for a particular food truck but not to eat at other local restaurants. She suggested that perhaps it should be limited to only Chanhassen-based food trucks and not food trucks from outside the community. Matt Rosati, owner of Chanhassen Brewery, stated that under the current ordinance, his business can apply for 15 temporary event permits and 4 special events per year. He hopes to bring food trucks and bands to the brewery which would quickly go through the allowed permits. He would like to change the ordinance to allow food trucks outside of special events. Under the current model, the brewery would have to pay for a permit and the food truck would have to pay for a permit but whatever the food truck makes they keep. His goal is not to reduce patronage to local restaurants but to get people to frequent his brewery by providing food and bands. Member Donovan asked if permits should be seasonal. Chair Anderson asked if there were concerns about parking. Mr. Rosati stated that he is currently working with the City on parking. He is looking to extend his patio area which would allow for a spot to put a food truck or outdoor games. Mr. Rosati would prefer if the ordinance no longer tied food trucks to special events. He felt that food trucks should pay for a one-time or seasonal permit. James Gordon, owner of Dog Park Gourmet Hot Dogs, stated that he has served food at breweries and at events throughout Minnesota. He stated that food trucks from outside Chanhassen are not paying rent but Chanhassen food trucks are paying rent. He operates a food cart rather than a truck which has fewer regulations and comes to a location by invitation. Michele Harvet, Chanhassen resident, supported allowing food trucks to operate outside of special events. Economic Development Commission – May 11 , 2021 4 Mr. Generous stated that a survey on the City website regarding the Mobile Food Vending ordinance received three comments in support of the ordinance allowing food trucks with a common refrain of “let food trucks in.” Steve Zumbusch, resident and representative of The Garden By The Woods, stated he was in favor of bringing more food trucks in. The Garden By The Woods has tried to get food trucks in but, due to parking limitations, has not had a good response. He would like to see adjustments in parking regulations. He feels that more competition encourages existing businesses to do things to a higher standard. Mr. Generous stated he would look into past requests by The Garden By The Woods to see why permits were denied. Member Ebeling asked if The Garden By The Woods has looked into partnering with restaurants to supply food for events. Mr. Zumbusch explained that people come to events that The Garden By The Woods holds looking to walk past and grab something to eat and move on. In a brewery, they might sit down for 5-10 minutes to wait for food. Joor Schultz, owner of Soup du Joor, has operated a food truck for three years. She spoke about the history of the food truck ordinance in Chanhassen. She currently holds permits and licenses within eight different cities and travels to breweries and wineries. Most breweries have food trucks on Friday and Saturday evenings. She felt that the proposed ordinance should be passed and food trucks shouldn’t be allowed to pull up at a park and start selling. If they receive permission from a location, they should be able to sell at a specific date and time. The cities she has worked with charge an annual permit fee between $0 and $150 per year. Her food truck has high insurance coverage and is licensed by the Minneapolis Department of Health. Within other cities, if the food truck goes to a private event there is no special permit required since the event is not publicly posted and does not draw traffic. If an event is held at a brewery, it would drive traffic so other cities require a permit. Chair Anderson asked if there were issues with parking at locations where Ms. Schultz brings her food truck. Ms. Schultz stated she has never had a parking issue. She typically has a designated spot at the breweries she works at. Her truck is 14 feet long but the average truck may be 20 feet long. She uses an electrical outlet outside of the building but other food trucks may run on propane or a generator. Chair Anderson asked about parking at a private residence. Economic Development Commission – May 11 , 2021 5 Ms. Schultz stated that rules about private residences depend on the city. Sometimes she is required to be within the driveway of the person who has hired her. She meets with them prior to the event to review the site and discuss electricity. She would avoid soft or muddy surfaces, such as a lawn, where the truck may sink in, but other types of hard surfaces would work and are not regulated by the Minnesota Department of Health. Member Donovan stated she has empathy for small businesses but believes in competition. She feels that patrons of the Chanhassen Brewery would still have access to local restaurant menus to choose from. She appreciates the suggestion of only allowing Chanhassen food trucks. Could there be a different fee structure for local food trucks versus ones from outside Chanhassen? Member Donovan felt that parking should be addressed on a case-by-case basis and the size of the food truck may also need to be considered. Member Ebeling was in favor of allowing more food trucks. Perhaps the number of days could be restricted or local restaurants could provide food on weekdays and food trucks on weekends. He also wondered if “special event” should be redefined or the number of allowed days changed. Mr. Generous stated that the Economic Development Commission was the first to look at the ordinance and it has not yet been reviewed by the City Attorney. Member Sanford stated that the definition of mobile food vending does not match between the proposed ordinance and Minnesota State Statute. He is concerned about parking issues and questions the need for impervious surfaces. He feels that trucks should have a designated parking area and food trucks should be allowed to service residential and commercial clients. Chair Anderson asked Mr. Generous about food trucks for a residential client. Mr. Generous stated that the food truck cannot be parked within the public right-of-way. Member Sanford felt that section “f” of the General Requirements on the proposed ordinance was awkward which states “The vehicle must be located on paved surfaces, but not on parking stalls (unless it has been proven that the business does not need those spaces).” He asked what the circumstances for proving that the business does not need those spaces would be. He would like to see the ordinance less regulated. Chair Anderson stated that most cities are getting away from heavy parking ratios. He asked if there could be some sort of trigger in the event they take up parking and there are repeat complaints from neighboring businesses. Mr. Sanford stated that money from permits could be used to fund subsidies. He also questioned if food trucks are allowed in public spaces, for example, at a softball game. Economic Development Commission – May 11 , 2021 6 Mr. Sanford added that a Restaurant Revitalization Fund has been established and is administered through the U.S. Small Business Administration. Applications for grants opened this week. Member Donovan left the meeting at 8:16 p.m. Member Kressler stated that Chanhassen needs this type of activity and he hopes there is a way to allow more flexibility in the process to get food trucks into Chanhassen. Mr. Gordon added a concern regarding peddlers who are not homeless or in need aggressively approaching residents and businesses. Member Kressler continued that food trucks should be allowed at private events. Mr. Sanford read a portion of the proposed ordinance “Vending operations on properties located in Residential Zoning Districts must limit sales to the property owner and other private parties”. Chair Anderson recommended looking into ways to manage right-of-way parking permits to allow food trucks to park on public streets. The Economic Development Commission members discussed their recommendations. Member Sanford recommended in the following paragraph “f”: “Vendors must park in a designated parking lot and must not impede normal traffic flow. The vehicle must be located on paved surfaces, but not on parking stalls (unless it has been proven that the business does not need those spaces).” striking “not on parking stalls (unless it has been proven that the business does not need those spaces). Chair Anderson asked staff to conduct a survey of other cities in the Twin Cities area to find out their food truck fees and not put Chanhassen fees at the top end of the spectrum. Member Sanford moved, Chair Anderson seconded to recommend the proposed ordinance amendment to Chapter 20, Secs. 20-972 as written with the following suggested changes: 1. Food trucks allowed and not limited to individual Chanhassen residents or businesses. 2. Relaxation of parking requirements including definition of impervious surfaces, consideration for vehicle weight restrictions, and access of public safety vehicles. 3. Annual permits required for all food trucks and permit fees going back into economic development. 4. Allowing food trucks to park on city streets on a case-by-case basis by permit. 5. Penalty and revocation of permit issuance for up to 13 months for violations. 6. Definitions should follow State Statutes. Economic Development Commission – May 11 , 2021 7 7. Removal of the statement in paragraph f: “not on parking stalls (unless it has been proven that the business does not need those spaces).” All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. BUSINESS SURVEY Senior Planner Generous asked the Economic Development Commission about their goals for conducting a business survey. Who do they want to ask the questions of? Member Ebeling responded that the Commission hoped to hear from business owners as well as potential developers. Member Sanford added that he would like to determine how the City is perceived. Is the City difficult to deal with or do they make the process of developing in Chanhassen easy? He would like to see more small businesses and more variety in the types of businesses who come to the City. He would like to see a plan on whom to bring to the City and how to incentivize them. Chair Anderson stated that he has participated in discussions between developers and Planning Commissions regarding what a developer wants to see but developers don’t want to share that information with their competitors. The City does not currently have an Economic Development Coordinator. Member Sanford stated that it would be helpful to involve the City Manager and Mayor in this discussion. Who is going to be designated to make these type of connections with businesses? The City needs to be allies with businesses and developers and, if the City is perceived as a problem, they need to change that perception. Member Sanford added, what do businesses need from the City and Economic Development Commission? There may need to be a different survey for restaurants. Chair Anderson suggested the City reach out to some of the businesses in town to ask what the best venue for collecting information would be. Mr. Generous added that the City is in the process of hiring a Communications Manager. Mr. Generous asked the Commission at what point of interaction the City should conduct this survey. When they fill out a building permit? Member Sanford stated there may be two types of survey. One could address “how did this process go?” and the other would determine what businesses are looking for from the City. Economic Development Commission – May 11 , 2021 8 Chair Anderson suggested the Commission may need to consult experts for advice on the development process in Chanhassen. The Economic Development Commission decided to table the discussion until the City Manager and Mayor could participate in discussions. Assistant City Manager Foster added that the City recently signed onto a survey service called FlashVote. Perhaps this tool could be used to conduct short, non-targeted surveys of residents. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. EMAIL FROM ELISE DURBIN DATED 04-14-2021 ADJOURNMENT. Member Sanford moved, Member Ebeling seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4-0. The Economic Development Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Submitted by Bob Generous Senior Planner Prepared by Kim Meuwissen Office Manager CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Approve Claims Paid 06­28­2021 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review and approval on June 28, 2021: Check Numbers Amounts 175525 – 175616 $955,402.50 ACH Payments 136,438.60 Total All Claims $1,091,841.10 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 6/18/2021 9:39 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount loc49 IUOE Local #49 06/03/2021 0.00 595.00175525 ACHEA AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 06/10/2021 0.00 4,110.00175526 AMETES AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/10/2021 0.00 575.00175527 AMETIR AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 06/10/2021 0.00 108.16175528 APAGRO APACHE GROUP 06/10/2021 0.00 83.00175529 APISup API Supply Inc.06/10/2021 0.00 2,671.71175530 BCATRA BCA 06/10/2021 0.00 15.00175531 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 06/10/2021 0.00 1,355.07175532 BRYROC BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 06/10/2021 0.00 505.43175533 CARTEC Carahsoft Technology Corporation 06/10/2021 0.00 1,725.00175534 CARLIC CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 06/10/2021 0.00 129.25175535 CARLIC CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 06/10/2021 0.00 8.50175536 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 0.00 1,360.62175537 CleSea Clean N Seal, Inc 06/10/2021 0.00 1,160.00175538 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 06/10/2021 0.00 56.24175539 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 06/10/2021 0.00 313.11175540 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 06/10/2021 0.00 3,934.58175541 FESSOU FESTIVAL SOUND AND LIGHTING 06/10/2021 0.00 1,000.00175542 GRABAR GRAYBAR 06/10/2021 0.00 676.80175543 GYMWOR GYM WORKS INC 06/10/2021 0.00 375.00175544 K2Ele K2 Electrical Services Inc 06/10/2021 0.00 8,362.00175545 LamSon Lametti & Sons Inc 06/10/2021 0.00 274,970.66175546 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 06/10/2021 0.00 710.71175547 LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 06/10/2021 0.00 107,344.00175548 Lennar Lennar 06/10/2021 0.00 1,909.12175549 LubTec Lube Tech ESI 06/10/2021 0.00 178.65175550 MarDan Daniel Martinez 06/10/2021 0.00 34.80175551 MetGar Metro Garage Door Company 06/10/2021 0.00 1,028.95175552 MetHol Metronet Holdings, LLC 06/10/2021 0.00 52.45175553 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 06/10/2021 0.00 205,291.66175554 MINPET MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE INC06/10/2021 0.00 8,700.00175555 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 06/10/2021 0.00 705.98175556 NORREC NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 06/10/2021 0.00 1,087.50175557 NORASP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 06/10/2021 0.00 46,652.00175558 PedKri Kris Pederson 06/10/2021 0.00 500.00175559 PILDRY PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 06/10/2021 0.00 368.72175560 QUAFIR Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 06/10/2021 0.00 750.00175561 ReaWat Ready Watt Electric 06/10/2021 0.00 4,815.00175562 SITLAN SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 06/10/2021 0.00 120.08175563 SMHEN SM HENTGES & SONS 06/10/2021 0.00 232,559.59175564 SupTur Superior Turf Services Inc.06/10/2021 0.00 950.19175565 pritan Priya Tandon 06/10/2021 0.00 100.00175566 TheMus The Mustard Seed, Inc.06/10/2021 0.00 281.83175567 TIMLAN TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC.06/10/2021 0.00 535.68175568 TraVan Travis Van Liere Studio 06/10/2021 0.00 12.00175569 triedeea DeeAnn Triethart 06/10/2021 0.00 28.58175570 ZEPMAN ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 06/10/2021 0.00 384.92175571 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/18/2021 9:39 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ALLENE All Energy Solar 06/17/2021 0.00 250.00175572 AllPool All Poolside Services Inc 06/17/2021 0.00 500.00175573 AMETES AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/17/2021 0.00 2,345.00175574 ARAMAR ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 06/17/2021 0.00 56.50175575 ArmWen Wendy Armstrong 06/17/2021 0.00 50.00175576 AsaAud Audrius Asakenas 06/17/2021 0.00 500.00175577 BanHil Banner Hill Design 06/17/2021 0.00 387.87175578 BCATRA BCA 06/17/2021 0.00 45.00175579 BigDec BigDeck.com Inc 06/17/2021 0.00 250.00175580 BowChr Chris Bowman 06/17/2021 0.00 25.00175581 CenLin CenturyLink 06/17/2021 0.00 64.00175582 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 06/17/2021 0.00 429.60175583 CUTABO CUT ABOVE INC 06/17/2021 0.00 1,980.00175584 DELTOO DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 06/17/2021 0.00 98.45175585 DEMCON DEM-CON LANDFILL 06/17/2021 0.00 976.15175586 EriMar Mark & Tanya Erickson 06/17/2021 0.00 100.00175587 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 06/17/2021 0.00 405.36175588 ForCon Forterra Concrete Products, Inc 06/17/2021 0.00 1,230.80175589 gonhom GONYEA HOMES 06/17/2021 0.00 2,750.00175590 GRELAK GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC06/17/2021 0.00 421.86175591 Ispiri Ispiri LLC 06/17/2021 0.00 1,000.00175592 JanBri Brijoy Janardhanan 06/17/2021 0.00 100.00175593 JidCha Chaitanya Jidge 06/17/2021 0.00 250.00175594 JotAru Arunkumar Jothiramalingam 06/17/2021 0.00 1,000.00175595 KTPEnt KTP Enterprises, Inc.06/17/2021 0.00 48.50175596 LauSco Scott & Kristin Lauerman 06/17/2021 0.00 250.00175597 LENCHE LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 06/17/2021 0.00 2,346.69175598 OUTSOL OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS INC 06/17/2021 0.00 750.00175599 PAUPOP Paul Pope Builders LLC 06/17/2021 0.00 500.00175600 PitBow Pitney Bowes Inc.06/17/2021 0.00 105.00175601 prosel Promotion Select 06/17/2021 0.00 270.00175602 QuiMic Michael Quinlan 06/17/2021 0.00 100.00175603 RMBENV RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 06/17/2021 0.00 208.00175604 SjoBen Benjamin & Karla Sjostrom 06/17/2021 0.00 500.00175605 ShaMde SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 06/17/2021 0.00 850.00175606 SoutDes SOUTHVIEW DESIGN INC 06/17/2021 0.00 500.00175607 SpaPet Peter Sparby 06/17/2021 0.00 100.00175608 STOLCARR Carrie & Glenn STOLAR 06/17/2021 0.00 106.45175609 TimSav TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 06/17/2021 0.00 151.00175610 TulLLC Tulies, LLC 06/17/2021 0.00 500.00175611 VarSte Stephanie Varone 06/17/2021 0.00 1,100.00175612 WanMat Matthew & Jillyse Wangerin 06/17/2021 0.00 500.00175613 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 0.00 1,148.93175614 WilDou Douglas & Sandra Wilder 06/17/2021 0.00 10,750.00175615 ZEPMAN ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 06/17/2021 0.00 209.80175616 Report Total (92 checks): 955,402.50 0.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (6/18/2021 9:39 AM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User:dwashburn Printed: 6/18/2021 9:40 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 06/10/2021 0.00 270.00 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 06/10/2021 0.00 146.25 ACH ANCTEC ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS 06/10/2021 0.00 169.75 ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 06/10/2021 0.00 5,721.00 ACH carcou Carver County 06/10/2021 0.00 16,781.07 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 0.00 6,882.04 ACH DISSAL DISPLAY SALES COMPANY 06/10/2021 0.00 921.00 ACH engwat Engel Water Testing Inc 06/10/2021 0.00 500.00 ACH ESSBRO ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 06/10/2021 0.00 3,927.00 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 06/10/2021 0.00 454.71 ACH HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 06/10/2021 0.00 342.00 ACH IMPPOR IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 06/10/2021 0.00 3,844.00 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 06/10/2021 0.00 39,315.90 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergency Group 06/10/2021 0.00 465.42 ACH Marco Marco Inc 06/10/2021 0.00 1,275.67 ACH MRPA MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 06/10/2021 0.00 200.00 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/10/2021 0.00 52.57 ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 06/10/2021 0.00 324.28 ACH PREMRM PRECISE MRM LLC 06/10/2021 0.00 325.00 ACH PRTURF PRO TURF 06/10/2021 0.00 2,166.00 ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 06/10/2021 0.00 7,266.10 ACH SafFas Safe-Fast, Inc. 06/10/2021 0.00 190.39 ACH TWISEE TWIN CITY SEED CO. 06/10/2021 0.00 384.00 ACH ULTCON ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 06/10/2021 0.00 1,530.00 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 06/10/2021 0.00 7,096.53 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 0.00 5,294.79 ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 06/10/2021 0.00 660.41 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/10/2021 0.00 1,666.16 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 06/10/2021 0.00 360.00 ACH ZARBRU ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 06/10/2021 0.00 1,427.00 ACH DALCO DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 06/17/2021 0.00 28.90 ACH GSDIR GS DIRECT INC 06/17/2021 0.00 217.31 ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 06/17/2021 0.00 2,922.25 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 06/17/2021 0.00 1,981.77 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 06/17/2021 0.00 48.15 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 06/17/2021 0.00 648.45 ACH LOCSUP LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 06/17/2021 0.00 414.69 ACH ManOil Mansfield Oil Company 06/17/2021 0.00 15,228.18 ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 0.00 1,126.15 ACH MinEqu Minnesota Equipment 06/17/2021 0.00 3.72 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/17/2021 0.00 280.06 ACH PioEng Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 06/17/2021 0.00 1,800.00 ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 06/17/2021 0.00 3.00 ACH SafFas Safe-Fast, Inc. 06/17/2021 0.00 118.15 ACH WATSON WATSON COMPANY 06/17/2021 0.00 456.80 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/17/2021 0.00 1,117.08 Page 1 of 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH ZARBRU ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 06/17/2021 0.00 84.90 Report Total:0.00 136,438.60 Page 2 of 2 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM Name Check Da Account Description Amount AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 06/10/2021 700-7019-4530 Professional Services 260.00 AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 06/10/2021 700-7019-4510 Professional Services 3,850.00 AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 4,110.00 All Energy Solar 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit 2021-03136 - 503 Del Rio Drive 250.00 All Energy Solar 250.00 All Poolside Services Inc 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit 2019-02795 - 10340 Heidi Lane 500.00 All Poolside Services Inc 500.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/10/2021 101-1220-4530 Professional Services 575.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/17/2021 101-1370-4530 Materials 300.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/17/2021 101-1320-4530 Materials 425.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/17/2021 701-0000-4530 Materials 175.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/17/2021 101-1320-4530 Materials 95.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/17/2021 101-1370-4530 Materials 150.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/17/2021 700-0000-4530 Materials 1,000.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 06/17/2021 101-1370-4530 Materials 200.00 AMERICAN TEST CENTER 2,920.00 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 108.16 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 108.16 APACHE GROUP 06/10/2021 101-1170-4110 Cleaning Supplies 83.00 APACHE GROUP 83.00 API Supply Inc.06/10/2021 101-1550-4300 Services 2,671.71 API Supply Inc. 2,671.71 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 06/17/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 56.50 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 56.50 Armstrong Wendy 06/17/2021 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 50.00 Armstrong Wendy 50.00 Asakenas Audrius 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit # 2020-02915 - 1680 West Farm Road 500.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM)Page 1 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Asakenas Audrius 500.00 Banner Hill Design 06/17/2021 720-7202-4300 City Hall flower planters 387.87 Banner Hill Design 387.87 BCA 06/10/2021 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 15.00 BCA 06/17/2021 101-1120-4300 Criminal Background Investigation 45.00 BCA 60.00 BigDeck.com Inc 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit # 2020-02494 - 2179 Red Fox Circle 250.00 BigDeck.com Inc 250.00 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 06/10/2021 701-7025-4751 Materials 1,355.07 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,355.07 Bowman Chris 06/17/2021 720-7202-3640 Community Garden Plot Refund 25.00 Bowman Chris 25.00 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 505.43 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 505.43 Carahsoft Technology Corporation 06/10/2021 101-1160-4370 Annual Renewal 1,725.00 Carahsoft Technology Corporation 1,725.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 06/10/2021 101-1550-4440 Registration 129.25 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 06/10/2021 101-1550-4440 Registration 8.50 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 137.75 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 24.72 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 22.06 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 22.06 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service 380.93 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service 198.98 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service 193.66 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service 72.06 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 06/10/2021 101-1530-4320 Monthly Service 446.15 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,360.62 CenturyLink 06/17/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 32.00 CenturyLink 06/17/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 32.00 CenturyLink 64.00 Clean N Seal, Inc 06/10/2021 101-1550-4300 Professional Services 1,160.00 Clean N Seal, Inc 1,160.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM)Page 2 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CORE & MAIN LP 06/17/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 429.60 CORE & MAIN LP 429.60 CUB FOODS 06/10/2021 101-1220-4350 Cleaning Supplies 56.24 CUB FOODS 56.24 CUT ABOVE INC 06/17/2021 720-7202-4300 Tree Service 1,980.00 CUT ABOVE INC 1,980.00 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 06/17/2021 101-1370-4350 Cleaning Supplies 96.52 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 06/17/2021 101-1320-4260 Cleaning Supplies 1.93 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 98.45 DEM-CON LANDFILL 06/17/2021 101-1320-4150 Materials Disposal 976.15 DEM-CON LANDFILL 976.15 Erickson Mark & Tanya 06/17/2021 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Erickson Mark & Tanya 100.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 313.11 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 313.11 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 06/10/2021 700-0000-4250 Materials 4,218.50 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 06/10/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 77.88 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 06/10/2021 700-0000-4250 Materials - Return -361.80 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 06/17/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 263.28 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 06/17/2021 700-0000-4550 Materials 142.08 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 4,339.94 FESTIVAL SOUND AND LIGHTING 06/10/2021 101-1600-4300 Audio Equipment Rental 1,000.00 FESTIVAL SOUND AND LIGHTING 1,000.00 Forterra Concrete Products, Inc 06/17/2021 720-7207-4570 Materials 1,230.80 Forterra Concrete Products, Inc 1,230.80 GONYEA HOMES 06/17/2021 101-0000-2075 Permit 2019-02154 - 9270 Eagle Ridge Rd 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit 2020-00860 - 9200 Eagle Ridge Rd 2,000.00 GONYEA HOMES 2,750.00 GRAYBAR 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 135.36 GRAYBAR 06/10/2021 101-1350-4120 Supplies 541.44 GRAYBAR 676.80 GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC06/17/2021 101-1540-4130 Supplies 421.86 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM)Page 3 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION LLC 421.86 GYM WORKS INC 06/10/2021 101-1530-4530 Equipment 375.00 GYM WORKS INC 375.00 Ispiri LLC 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit # 2020-01932 - 9391 Kiowa Trail 1,000.00 Ispiri LLC 1,000.00 IUOE Local #49 06/03/2021 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00403.06.2021 Local 49 dues 378.02 IUOE Local #49 06/03/2021 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00403.06.2021 Local 49 dues 161.29 IUOE Local #49 06/03/2021 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00403.06.2021 Local 49 dues 55.69 IUOE Local #49 595.00 Janardhanan Brijoy 06/17/2021 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Janardhanan Brijoy 100.00 Jidge Chaitanya 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit # 2021-02210 - 9074 Degler Lane - Erosion Control 250.00 Jidge Chaitanya 250.00 Jothiramalingam Arunkumar 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 9044 Degler Lane - Permit 2021-02167 1,000.00 Jothiramalingam Arunkumar 1,000.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 06/10/2021 101-1550-4300 Professional Services 4,672.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 06/10/2021 101-1550-4300 Professional Services 3,690.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 8,362.00 KTP Enterprises, Inc.06/17/2021 101-1310-4140 Supplies 48.50 KTP Enterprises, Inc. 48.50 Lametti & Sons Inc 06/10/2021 601-6043-4751 Minnewashta Parkway Rehab 274,970.66 Lametti & Sons Inc 274,970.66 Lano Equipment 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 710.71 Lano Equipment 710.71 Lauerman Scott & Kristin 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit # 2020-01348 - 9853 Trails End Road 250.00 Lauerman Scott & Kristin 250.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 06/10/2021 101-1170-4483 Insurance 46,276.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 06/10/2021 101-1170-4483 Insurance 61,068.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 107,344.00 Lennar 06/10/2021 101-1250-3302 Plan Review Fee refund 957.79 Lennar 06/10/2021 101-1250-3302 Plan Review Fee refund 951.33 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM)Page 4 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Lennar 1,909.12 LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 06/17/2021 700-0000-4140 Supplies 2,346.69 LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 2,346.69 Lube Tech ESI 06/10/2021 101-1370-4170 Oil 357.30 Lube Tech ESI 06/10/2021 101-1370-4170 Used Oil -178.65 Lube Tech ESI 178.65 Martinez Daniel 06/10/2021 101-1250-3306 Permit Fee Refund - Permit P2021-00307 34.80 Martinez Daniel 34.80 Metro Garage Door Company 06/10/2021 101-1370-4510 Service work on garage door 1,028.95 Metro Garage Door Company 1,028.95 Metronet Holdings, LLC 06/10/2021 700-7043-4310 Monthly Service 52.45 Metronet Holdings, LLC 52.45 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 06/10/2021 701-0000-4509 Waste Water 205,291.66 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 205,291.66 MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE INC 06/10/2021 400-0000-4706 Professional Service 2,900.00 MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE INC 06/10/2021 700-7025-4706 Professional Service 2,900.00 MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE INC 06/10/2021 701-7025-4706 Professional Service 2,900.00 MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE INC 8,700.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 155.41 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 550.57 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 705.98 NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 1,087.50 NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 1,087.50 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 06/10/2021 420-0000-4751 Pothole Patching 46,652.00 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 46,652.00 OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS INC 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit 2019-01809 - 1140 Pleasant View Road 250.00 OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS INC 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit 2019-00632 - 513 Greenview Drive 250.00 OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS INC 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit 2019-02978 - 9300 River Rock Drive 250.00 OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS INC 750.00 Paul Pope Builders LLC 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit #2020-02892 - 7727 Frontier Trail 500.00 Paul Pope Builders LLC 500.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM)Page 5 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Pederson Kris 06/10/2021 101-1620-4300 Concert Series Performance 500.00 Pederson Kris 500.00 PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 06/10/2021 101-1220-4300 May Cleaning 368.72 PILGRIM DRY CLEANERS 368.72 Pitney Bowes Inc.06/17/2021 101-1120-4410 Rental 105.00 Pitney Bowes Inc. 105.00 Promotion Select 06/17/2021 101-1110-4375 Sunglasses 270.00 Promotion Select 270.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 06/10/2021 101-1370-4350 Public Works Cleaning 600.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 06/10/2021 700-0000-4350 Public Works Cleaning 75.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 06/10/2021 701-0000-4350 Public Works Cleaning 75.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 750.00 Quinlan Michael 06/17/2021 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Quinlan Michael 100.00 Ready Watt Electric 06/10/2021 101-1220-4300 Service Work 4,815.00 Ready Watt Electric 4,815.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 06/17/2021 720-0000-4300 Beach Monitoring 104.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 06/17/2021 720-0000-4300 Beach Monitoring 104.00 RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc 208.00 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 120.08 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 120.08 Sjostrom Benjamin & Karla 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 7022 Dakota Circle - Permit 2020-03656 500.00 Sjostrom Benjamin & Karla 500.00 SM HENTGES & SONS 06/10/2021 605-6503-4751 CP 14-08 CSAH 101 Improvement Project 52,194.74 SM HENTGES & SONS 06/10/2021 605-6502-4751 CP 14-08 CSAH 101 Improvement Project 180,364.85 SM HENTGES & SONS 232,559.59 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 06/17/2021 720-7206-4300 Organics recycling 850.00 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 850.00 SOUTHVIEW DESIGN INC 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit 2020-00666 - 10340 Heidi Lane 500.00 SOUTHVIEW DESIGN INC 500.00 Sparby Peter 06/17/2021 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM)Page 6 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Sparby Peter 100.00 STOLAR Carrie & Glenn 06/17/2021 101-1320-4150 Sprinkler head repair due to damage from City plows 106.45 STOLAR Carrie & Glenn 106.45 Superior Turf Services Inc.06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 950.19 Superior Turf Services Inc. 950.19 Tandon Priya 06/10/2021 101-0000-1027 Concessions set-up 100.00 Tandon Priya 100.00 The Mustard Seed, Inc.06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 35.96 The Mustard Seed, Inc.06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 149.97 The Mustard Seed, Inc.06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 95.90 The Mustard Seed, Inc. 281.83 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC.06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 214.27 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC.06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Mulch 321.41 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC. 535.68 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 06/17/2021 210-0000-4300 Planning Commission Meeting 151.00 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc 151.00 Travis Van Liere Studio 06/10/2021 101-0000-2033 Overpayment 12.00 Travis Van Liere Studio 12.00 Triethart DeeAnn 06/10/2021 101-1170-4110 office supplies 28.58 Triethart DeeAnn 28.58 Tulies, LLC 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 414 Santa Fe Trail - Permit 2021-01123 500.00 Tulies, LLC 500.00 Varone Stephanie 06/17/2021 101-1620-4300 Concert Series Performance 1,100.00 Varone Stephanie 1,100.00 Wangerin Matthew & Jillyse 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit # 2020-02102 - 9080 Degler Circle 500.00 Wangerin Matthew & Jillyse 500.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 101-1550-4350 Monthly Service 302.49 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 101-1370-4350 Monthly Service 233.47 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 700-0000-4350 Monthly Service 29.19 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 701-0000-4350 Monthly Service 29.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 101-1190-4350 Monthly Service 240.59 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 101-1170-4350 Monthly Service 205.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 30.38 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM)Page 7 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 06/17/2021 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 77.97 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,148.93 Wilder Douglas & Sandra 06/17/2021 101-0000-2073 Permit 2019-02140 - 10340 Heidi Lane - Erosion Control 10,000.00 Wilder Douglas & Sandra 06/17/2021 101-0000-2075 Landscape Escrow - 10340 Heidi Lane 750.00 Wilder Douglas & Sandra 10,750.00 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 06/10/2021 101-1220-4120 Supplies 96.23 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 06/10/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 96.23 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 96.23 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 06/10/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 96.23 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 06/17/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 209.80 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 594.72 955,402.50 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (06/18/2021 - 11:00 AM)Page 8 of 8 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 06/18/2021 - 10:26 AM Name Check Dat Account Description Amount ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 06/10/2021 101-1190-4300 Monthly Service 270.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 270.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 06/10/2021 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 146.25 Al-Hilwani Juli 146.25 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS 06/10/2021 101-1220-4531 Supplies 169.75 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS 169.75 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 06/10/2021 601-6043-4300 Minnewashta Parkway Rehab 5,721.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 5,721.00 Carver County 06/10/2021 601-0000-4300 Joint Powers Agreement 16,681.07 Carver County 06/10/2021 101-1210-4300 Liquor License renew - Davanni 100.00 Carver County 16,781.07 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 101-1220-4320 Monthly Service 115.55 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 3,018.11 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 101-1540-4320 Monthly Service 339.13 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service 360.60 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 27.69 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 105.28 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service 1,685.91 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 06/10/2021 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 1,229.77 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 6,882.04 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.06/17/2021 101-1370-4140 Supplies 28.90 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 28.90 DISPLAY SALES COMPANY 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 921.00 DISPLAY SALES COMPANY 921.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 06/10/2021 700-0000-4300 Water samples 500.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 500.00 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 06/10/2021 701-0000-4150 Supplies 3,927.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/18/2021 - 10:26 AM)Page 1 of 5 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 3,927.00 FASTENAL COMPANY 06/10/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 454.71 FASTENAL COMPANY 454.71 GS DIRECT INC 06/17/2021 101-1170-4110 Supplies 217.31 GS DIRECT INC 217.31 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 06/17/2021 720-7205-4300 Chan Rec Center - Boundary & Topographic Survey 551.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 06/17/2021 720-7025-4300 Crane's Vineyard Channel Stabilization 495.75 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 06/17/2021 720-7025-4300 Pawnee Drive Survey 1,875.50 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 2,922.25 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 06/17/2021 700-7043-4160 Chemicals 1,981.77 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 1,981.77 Hoops & Threads LLC 06/10/2021 701-0000-4240 Apparel 171.00 Hoops & Threads LLC 06/10/2021 700-0000-4240 Apparel 171.00 Hoops & Threads LLC 342.00 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 06/10/2021 101-1550-4400 Portal Restrooms 3,844.00 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 3,844.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 06/17/2021 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 48.15 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 48.15 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 06/17/2021 400-4105-4705 Equipment 648.45 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 648.45 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 06/10/2021 605-6502-4300 TH101 Reconstruction 28,888.56 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 06/10/2021 605-6503-4300 TH101 Reconstruction 3,252.69 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 06/10/2021 601-6047-4300 2020 Pavement Rehab 6,878.65 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 06/10/2021 400-0000-1155 Private Dev Field inspection 296.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 39,315.90 LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 06/17/2021 700-0000-4150 Fire Hydrant 414.69 LOCATORS AND SUPPLIES INC 414.69 Macqueen Emergency Group 06/10/2021 400-4105-4705 Equipment 465.42 Macqueen Emergency Group 465.42 Mansfield Oil Company 06/17/2021 101-1370-4170 Fuel/Oil 6,750.50 Mansfield Oil Company 06/17/2021 101-1370-4170 Fuel 8,477.68 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/18/2021 - 10:26 AM)Page 2 of 5 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount Mansfield Oil Company 15,228.18 Marco Inc 06/10/2021 101-1170-4410 Equipment Rental 945.04 Marco Inc 06/10/2021 700-0000-4410 Equipment Rental 132.25 Marco Inc 06/10/2021 701-0000-4410 Equipment Rental 132.25 Marco Inc 06/10/2021 720-0000-4410 Equipment Rental 66.13 Marco Inc 1,275.67 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 101-1220-4120 Supplies 191.00 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 101-1220-4510 Materials 12.91 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 101-1310-4120 Supplies 53.99 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 101-1320-4260 Equipment 14.38 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 101-1540-4130 Supplies 26.05 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 455.32 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 226.02 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 101-1550-4530 Materials 8.26 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 700-0000-4120 Supplies 31.25 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 700-0000-4150 Materials 55.57 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 700-0000-4350 Supplies 5.39 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 700-7019-4120 Supplies 15.29 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 700-7019-4150 Materials 8.63 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 700-7019-4510 Materials 6.83 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 06/17/2021 700-7043-4550 Materials 15.26 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 1,126.15 Minnesota Equipment 06/17/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 3.72 Minnesota Equipment 3.72 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.06/10/2021 101-1700-4300 Softball Team Registration 200.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 200.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/10/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 52.57 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/17/2021 101-1370-4260 Tools 103.98 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 06/17/2021 701-0000-4120 Supplies 176.08 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 332.63 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 06/10/2021 101-1320-4140 Supplies 155.33 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 66.56 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 06/10/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 34.29 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 06/10/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies -17.64 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 06/10/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 85.74 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 324.28 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.06/17/2021 720-7025-4300 Royal Oaks Estates 1,800.00 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 1,800.00 PRECISE MRM LLC 06/10/2021 101-1320-4310 2021-04 Subcription 325.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/18/2021 - 10:26 AM)Page 3 of 5 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount PRECISE MRM LLC 325.00 Premium Waters, Inc 06/17/2021 101-1550-4120 Supplies 3.00 Premium Waters, Inc 3.00 PRO TURF 06/10/2021 101-1550-4300 Services 1,379.00 PRO TURF 06/10/2021 101-1550-4300 Services 128.00 PRO TURF 06/10/2021 101-1550-4300 Services 479.00 PRO TURF 06/10/2021 101-1550-4300 Services 180.00 PRO TURF 2,166.00 RBM SERVICES INC 06/10/2021 101-1190-4350 Cleaning Service 3,575.23 RBM SERVICES INC 06/10/2021 101-1170-4350 Cleaning Service 3,690.87 RBM SERVICES INC 7,266.10 Safe-Fast, Inc.06/10/2021 101-1170-4240 safety clothing 115.44 Safe-Fast, Inc.06/10/2021 101-1320-4240 safety clothing 74.95 Safe-Fast, Inc.06/17/2021 101-1550-4240 Clothing 118.15 Safe-Fast, Inc. 308.54 TWIN CITY SEED CO.06/10/2021 101-1550-4150 Materials 384.00 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 384.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 06/10/2021 700-7019-4530 Professional Services 1,530.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 1,530.00 USA BLUE BOOK 06/10/2021 700-7043-4510 Materials 134.90 USA BLUE BOOK 06/10/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies - Return -198.51 USA BLUE BOOK 06/10/2021 700-7043-4510 Materials 7,160.14 USA BLUE BOOK 7,096.53 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly service 492.77 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 720-0000-4310 Monthly service 222.44 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1160-4310 Monthly service 219.23 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1120-4310 Monthly service 704.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1170-4310 Monthly service 130.43 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1260-4310 Monthly service 76.52 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1250-4310 Monthly service 288.07 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1310-4310 Monthly service 223.32 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1370-4310 Monthly service 100.67 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1320-4310 Monthly service 325.38 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1220-4310 Monthly service 503.14 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-0000-2033 Monthly service 11.32 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1110-4300 Monthly service 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly service 87.57 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 701-0000-4310 Monthly service 87.57 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1220-4310 Monthly service 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1550-4310 Monthly service 823.97 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/18/2021 - 10:26 AM)Page 4 of 5 Name Check Dat Account Description Amount VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1520-4310 Monthly service 41.51 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1600-4310 Monthly service 197.26 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 101-1530-4310 Monthly service 41.51 VERIZON WIRELESS 06/10/2021 700-0000-4310 Monthly service 638.08 VERIZON WIRELESS 5,294.79 WATSON COMPANY 06/10/2021 101-1540-4130 Supplies 463.89 WATSON COMPANY 06/10/2021 101-1620-4130 Supplies 196.52 WATSON COMPANY 06/17/2021 101-1540-4130 Supplies 456.80 WATSON COMPANY 1,117.21 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/10/2021 420-0000-4150 Materials 963.20 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/10/2021 420-0000-4150 Materials 702.96 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/17/2021 420-0000-4150 Materials 675.12 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 06/17/2021 420-0000-4150 Materials 441.96 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 2,783.24 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 06/10/2021 601-6039-4300 Lake Drive East Improvement 360.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 360.00 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 06/10/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 1,427.00 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 06/17/2021 101-1320-4120 Supplies 84.90 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 1,511.90 136,438.60 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (06/18/2021 - 10:26 AM)Page 5 of 5 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Approve Consultant Contract Amendment for the Minnewashta Parkway Improvement Project Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.7. Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: ENG 20­02 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a contract amendment with Kimley­Horn and Associates for the Minnewashta Parkway Improvement Project (City Project 20­02).” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Assoc. for Design and Construction Services. On October 28, 2019, the City Council approved ordering the project and approved contract Amendment #1, which included an increased scope to both roadway and watermain work. On April 27, 2020, the City Council approved awarding the construction contract. A summary of the Kimley­Horn contracting is here: Change Total For Original Contract (IPO 33)N/A $249,655 Initial scope Contract Amendment #1 (IPO 33A)$244,015 $493,670 Changed rehab type, added 700 feet of roadway length and watermain Contract Amendment #2 (IPO 33B)$9,600 $503,270 Temporary Signal Design Contract Amendment #3 (IPO 33C)$269,200 $772,470 Additions for 2nd year BACKGROUND The original contract was based on a single construction season.  This amendment is needed to align the services with the change to a two­year construction schedule which was made during design after addition of the watermain rehabilitation scope and lengthening the roadway scope. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 28, 2021SubjectApprove Consultant Contract Amendment for the Minnewashta Parkway Improvement ProjectSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.7.Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public WorksDirector/City Engineer File No: ENG 20­02PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a contract amendment with Kimley­Horn and Associates for the Minnewashta ParkwayImprovement Project (City Project 20­02).”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Assoc. for Design andConstruction Services.On October 28, 2019, the City Council approved ordering the project and approved contract Amendment #1, whichincluded an increased scope to both roadway and watermain work.On April 27, 2020, the City Council approved awarding the construction contract.A summary of the Kimley­Horn contracting is here:Change Total ForOriginal Contract(IPO 33)N/A $249,655 Initial scopeContract Amendment #1(IPO 33A)$244,015 $493,670 Changed rehab type, added 700 feet ofroadway length and watermainContract Amendment #2(IPO 33B)$9,600 $503,270 Temporary Signal DesignContract Amendment #3(IPO 33C)$269,200 $772,470 Additions for 2nd yearBACKGROUNDThe original contract was based on a single construction season.  This amendment is needed to align the services with the change to a two­year construction schedule which was made during design after addition of the watermain rehabilitation scope and lengthening the roadway scope. The services are necessary for the completion of the project. With this amendment, the overall project budget is as follows: Budget:$ 5,254,000 Current:$ 4,505,612 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council approval of the contract amendment. ATTACHMENTS: Kimley­Horn Contract Amendment 1 INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ORDER (IPO) NUMBER 33C Describing a specific agreement between Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (“Consultant”), and the City of Chanhassen (“City”) in accordance with the terms of the Agreement for Professional Services dated March 3, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference. Identification of Project: Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation City Project No. 2020-02 General Category of Services: Feasibility Report, Final Design, and Construction Phase Services Specific Scope of Basic Services: Provide additional construction phase services for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway as detailed in the attached Scope of Services (Exhibit A). Additional Services if Required: None identified at this time Deliverables: Construction documentation Method of Compensation: To be billed on an hourly (cost plus) basis as detailed in the attached Estimated Costs summary (Exhibit B) Schedule: See attached Project Schedule (Exhibit C) Special Terms of Compensation: None Other Special Terms of Individual Project Order: None ACCEPTED: CITY OF CHANHASSEN KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: BY: TITLE: TITLE: DATE: DATE: 2 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ORDER (IPO) NO. 33C MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 2020-02 IPO 33, 33A, and 33B included feasibility report, final design and construction phase services for the rehabilitation of approximately 1.35 miles of Minnewashta Parkway, a Municipal State Aid Street. Minnewashta Parkway is located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between Highway 5 and Highway 7. During the feasibility report phase, the scope of the project expanded to include the following additional work:  Extension of the project limits to include an additional 700 feet of roadway and utility improvements to the south within the City of Victoria.  Change in roadway improvements from a mill and overlay to a pavement reclamation project.  Extension of the construction schedule to a two-year project to be completed in 2021. This IPO is for additional construction phase services necessary for the additional project scope as detailed below: 1. Design and Bidding Services – No change. a) Preparation of Feasibility Report b) Preparation of Preliminary and Final Plans c) Evaluate Existing Storm Sewer and Propose Surface Water Management Systems d) Identify Right-of-Way/Easements Required e) Preparation of Assessment Rolls f) Bidding Services 2. Surveying for Design Services – No change. 3. Meetings – No change. 4. Surveying for Construction Services The following additional construction staking services were required during the project construction:  Locate existing property corners for multiple properties.  Research and order an owners and encumbrances report for the 6810 Minnewashta Parkway property.  Additional staking for driveway construction.  Additional staking for pedestrian ramp construction.  Additional utility staking at the contractor’s request. 3 5. Construction Observation and Administration Our current scope of services is based on an assumed 32-week construction schedule over two construction seasons. During the first construction season, the contractor worked for 26 weeks and we anticipate the contractor working an additional 28 weeks during the second construction season for a total of 54 weeks. Construction Observation Due to the additional 22 weeks of construction, we have included additional full-time construction observation assuming 55 hours/week. We have also included 100 hours of construction observation in 2022 for punch list and 80 hours for final project closeout field tasks. Construction Administration Due to the additional 22 weeks of construction, we have included an additional 15 hours/week of construction administration. The construction administration will include the following tasks:  Preparing agendas and minutes and facilitating weekly construction meetings on the project site.  Reviewing contractor submittals.  Reviewing and preparing change orders.  Preparing payment applications.  Responding to design questions during construction.  Agency coordination during construction. 6. As-Built Preparation – No change. 4 EXHIBIT B ESTIMATED COSTS INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ORDER (IPO) NO. 33C MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 2020-02 We propose to perform all services for the project on an hourly (cost plus) basis. The following is a summary of our estimated not-to-exceed costs for the additional services included in this IPO. Work Estimated Task Description Fees/Expenses 1. Design and Bidding Services $ 0 2. Surveying for Design Services $ 0 3. Meetings $ 0 4. Surveying for Construction $ 10,000 5. Construction Administration and Observation Construction Observation $180,000 Construction Administration $ 64,000 6. As-Built Preparation $ 0 Subtotal $254,000 Reimbursable Expenses $ 15,200 Total Estimated Fees and Expenses $269,200 Our overall budget for the project is, therefore, changed from $503,270 to $772,470 including all labor and reimbursable expenses. 5 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE INDIVIDUAL PROJECT ORDER (IPO) NO. 33C MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 2020-02 The proposed schedule for the project is as follows: Award Consultant Contract Neighborhood Project Open House Accept Feasibility Report/Call Public Hearing Public Hearing Approve Plans & Specifications Bid Opening Neighborhood Meeting Assessment Hearing/Award Contract Start Construction Substantial Construction Complete January 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 April/May 2020 October 2021 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Resolution 2021­XX: Approve Cooperative Agreement for the Minnesota Statewide All­ Hazards Incident Management Organization Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.8. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No:  PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council approves the Cooperative Agreement with the All­Hazards Incident Management Team (AHIMT) to share resources to support incident management activities both within and outside the State of Minnesota."  Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Fire Chief and Emergency Management Director Don Johnson is currently an active member of the All­Hazards Incident Management Team (AHIMT) and has deployed for incidents within the state.  As a member of the AHIMT, the probability of future deployment within and outside the state for major incidents or natural acts is imminent.   This agreement formalizes a separate liability coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities (LMCIT) when deployed resources are acting on behalf of the AHIMT for both personnel and equipment.  The agreement also considers the AHIMT being deployed into Chanhassen if the need were to arise.   Chanhassen is currently NOT part of the existing Joint Powers Agreement that is being dissolved.   RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the resolution and cooperation agreement with the AHIMT.    ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Cooperative Agreement Background from AHIMT CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 28, 2021 RESOLUTION NO: 2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE MINNESOTA STATEWIDE ALL-HAZARDS INCIDENT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization is an organization of Minnesota cities, counties, certain nonprofits, and other governmental entities who agree to make available their employees, agents, volunteers, or contractors to be rostered for deployment and activated to respond to incidents inside and outside the State of Minnesota as requested by another local agency or unit of government; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization Cooperative Agreement governs the organization and outlines the duties and responsibilities of the participants in the organization; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen’s (“City”) participation in the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization will benefit the City and other governmental units and agencies in the State of Minnesota. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as follows: 1. City of Chanhassen participation in the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization is hereby approved. 2. The Cooperative Agreement for the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization is hereby approved and a signature page shall be executed by the Mayor and City Manager and delivered to the Operating Committee as provided in the Cooperative Agreement. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2021. ATTEST: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 28, 2021 RESOLUTION NO: 2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE MINNESOTA STATEWIDE ALL-HAZARDS INCIDENT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization is an organization of Minnesota cities, counties, certain nonprofits, and other governmental entities who agree to make available their employees, agents, volunteers, or contractors to be rostered for deployment and activated to respond to incidents inside and outside the State of Minnesota as requested by another local agency or unit of government; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization Cooperative Agreement governs the organization and outlines the duties and responsibilities of the participants in the organization; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen’s (“City”) participation in the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization will benefit the City and other governmental units and agencies in the State of Minnesota. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as follows: 1. City of Chanhassen participation in the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization is hereby approved. 2. The Cooperative Agreement for the Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization is hereby approved and a signature page shall be executed by the Mayor and City Manager and delivered to the Operating Committee as provided in the Cooperative Agreement. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2021. ATTEST: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT MEMORANDUM TO: AHIMT Members FROM: AHIMT Leadership Team / Operating Committee DATE: May, 20, 2021 RE: Minnesota Statewide All-Hazards Incident Management Organization Cooperative Agreement Beginning in late 2008, several local jurisdictions signed the Joint Powers Agreement Establishing the Regional All-Hazards Incident Management Organization (“IMO”), referred to in this memo as the “JPA”, which created a joint powers entity that could deploy an All-Hazards Incident Management Team (“AHIMT”). An AHIMT is comprised of employees of the various participants in the JPA who could be deployed to support incident management activities both within and outside of the State of Minnesota. The JPA was governed by a Board of Directors that had broad powers, including the power to establish, train, equip, maintain and govern the IMO; purchase and maintain equipment for the IMO; and enter into contracts related to the IMO. This proposal to terminate the JPA and enter into a new Cooperative Agreement re- structuring the IMO is based in insurance and liability concerns. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (“LMCIT”), which insures several of the JPA city-participants, excludes liability coverage for actions that arise out of a joint powers entity. This means that cities that are members of the JPA would not have liability coverage for matters that arise from the actions of their employees while deployed or acting on behalf of an AHIMT. At some point, it appears that the JPA Board of Directors purchased errors and omissions coverage for the actions of the Board and separate liability coverage from LMCIT for the joint powers entity. As part of that liability coverage, city employees working as part of the AHIMT would have been covered for liability purposes. In early 2019, management of the IMO was moved from the City of Bloomington to Anoka County and it was discovered that neither of these insurance coverages were still in place. The Board of Directors has not been operating in any formal manner for some time. To address this issue and avoid the need for separate liability coverage for the organization, IMO leadership has determined that the IMO does not need to be structured as a joint powers entity to function effectively. Accordingly, we have prepared a new “Cooperative Agreement” to govern the IMO going forward. Rather than a Board of Directors, the IMO will be governed by an operating committee with limited powers to receive requests for assistance and facilitate deployment of an AHIMT. Each participant will supply and be responsible for its own equipment and employees. The LMCIT has reviewed the Cooperative Agreement and confirmed that cities providing equipment and employees to the AHIMT under the new agreement will be covered April 26, 2021 Page 2 under their LMCIT liability coverage. The Minnesota Counties Insurance Trust has also reviewed the Cooperative Agreement. The intent is to terminate the JPA and have all participants sign on to the new Cooperative Agreement. Included with this memo is the Cooperative Agreement, a sample resolution that JPA participants can use to withdraw from the JPA and approve the new Cooperative Agreement, and a sample resolution approving the Cooperative Agreement for those entities not previously participants in the JPA. P:\home\1607.001 - EP - Fire Department - General\All Hazards Incident Management JPA\Documents\2020 11 12 - Memo to Participants re AHIMT.docx CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Resolution 2021­XX: Approve Cooperative Agreement with Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for Rice Marsh Lake Water Quality Improvement Project Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.9. Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public Works Director/City Engineer File No: SWMP­053 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a Resolution approving a Cooperative Agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for the Rice Marsh Lake Water Quality Improvement Project.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) is in final design stage of a Water Quality (WQ) Improvement project located in Rice Marsh Lake Park.  These joint projects typically require Cooperative Agreements between the Agencies to outline responsibilities including, costs, duties, ownership, maintenance, etc. The City has no funding obligations for the design or construction of the project, but will own and maintain the system upon completion. This agreement is on the July 7, 2021 RPBCWD Board of Managers meeting agenda for their review and approval. BACKGROUND The background of the project including identifying the need is found in the Recitals of the Agreement. This project is part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP Project No. SWMP­053). The project is scheduled for construction later this summer and into the fall.  Staff has reviewed the project at all stages of design.  The 90% design plans are attached. The City attorney has reviewed this agreement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Cooperative Agreement. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 28, 2021SubjectResolution 2021­XX: Approve Cooperative Agreement with Riley Purgatory Bluff CreekWatershed District for Rice Marsh Lake Water Quality Improvement ProjectSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.9.Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public WorksDirector/City Engineer File No: SWMP­053PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a Resolution approving a Cooperative Agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff CreekWatershed District for the Rice Marsh Lake Water Quality Improvement Project.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) is in final design stage of a Water Quality (WQ)Improvement project located in Rice Marsh Lake Park.  These joint projects typically require CooperativeAgreements between the Agencies to outline responsibilities including, costs, duties, ownership, maintenance, etc.The City has no funding obligations for the design or construction of the project, but will own and maintain the systemupon completion.This agreement is on the July 7, 2021 RPBCWD Board of Managers meeting agenda for their review and approval.BACKGROUNDThe background of the project including identifying the need is found in the Recitals of the Agreement.This project is part of the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP Project No. SWMP­053).The project is scheduled for construction later this summer and into the fall.  Staff has reviewed the project at all stagesof design.  The 90% design plans are attached.The City attorney has reviewed this agreement.RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Cooperative Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: 90% Design Plans CIP Sheet Resolution 21­XX Exhibit A of Agreement CONTACTS: PROJECT OWNER: Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District WATERSHED DISTRICT PROJECT MANAGER: Terry Jeffery Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Phone: 952-807-6885 Email: tjeffery@rpbcwd.org RPBCWD ENGINEER: Scott Sobiech, PE Barr Engineering Co. Phone: 952-832-2755 Email: ssobiech@barr.com PROJECT ENGINEER: Heather N. Hlavaty, PE Barr Engineering Co. Phone: 952-842-3613 Email: HHlavaty@barr.com CITY REPRESENTATIVES: Charles Howley Director of Public Works/City Engineer Phone: 952-227-1169 Email: CHowley@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Matt Unmacht Water Resources Coordinator Phone: 952-227-1168 Email: MUnmacht@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Matt Petite Construction Manager Phone: 952-227-1166 Email: MPetite@ci.chanhassen.mn.us GOPHER STATE ONE CALL: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG. 1-800-252-1166 RICE MARSH LAKE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION N G-01 SITE LOCATION AND SHEET INDEX C-01 STORM SEWER AND WATER QUALITY TREATMENT - PLAN AND PROFILES C-02 GRADING AND PAVEMENT RESTORATION - PLAN, PROFILE AND SECTIONS C-03 CURB INLET AND SPLASH BLOCK ASSEMBLY - PLAN, SECTION AND DETAIL C-04 EROSION CONTROL SECTIONS AND DETAILS C-05 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND CITY STANDARD PLATES C-06 CITY STANDARD PLATES C-07 KRAKEN FILTRATION SYSTEM STANDARD DETAIL (PROPRIETARY) C-08 KRAKEN FILTRATION SYSTEM PARTITION & BAFFLE WALL DETAILS (PROPRIETARY) L-01 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-02 LANDSCAPE SECTIONS AND DETAILS PROJECT AREA GENERAL NOTES: 1.TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONDUCTED BY BARR ENGINEERING CO. IN NOVEMBER 2019. 2.IMAGERY: COPYRIGHT NEARMAP LIMITED, DATED APRIL 2020. 3.HORIZONTAL DATUM AND COORDINATE SYSTEM: NAD83 MINNESOTA STATE PLANES, SOUTH ZONE, US FOOT. 4.VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88. 5.UTILITIES SHOWN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA AND DO NOT REFLECT A COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. PROJECT LOCATION CARVER COUNTY CHANHASSEN, MN. 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET DAK O T A L A N E REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No.Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 4/12/2021 GGN - - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SITE LOCATION AND SHEET INDEX 23/27-0053.14 TO28B G-01 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_G-01.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:19 PMSuite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 GV 24" 2" Oak 12" 18" 18" Light Pole 15" 12" 12" 36" Birch" clump-5 15" 8" 876.2 W.S. 2019/11/12 XXXXSSS S S S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N SANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN EX MCES MH-4 TC. 880.70 W-IE.(IN) 868.71 NE-IE.(OUT) 868.71 EX MCES MH-3 TC. 881.10 SW-IE.(IN) 868.58 0+001+002+002+201 5 2CARTR IDGES 1 5 2CARTRIDGES 0+00 0+85 KF-10-16-72 (KF2) VAULT TOP 884.63 SW-IE.(IN) 880.21 SW-IE.(IN) 877.71 TC 894.90 TC 894.21 TC 894.57 TC 895.24 TC 895.58 TC 891.40 TC 891.19 TC 890.86 TC 890.63 TC 890.31 8 9 5 900880885890895 885875 880 885 890 895 900 875 880 885 890 895 900 0+00 0+25 0+50 0+75 0+850+25 0+50 0+75 NEW CBMH-3709 (72") R-3067VB ASSY TC. 896.89 E-IE.(OUT) 880.85 SE-IE.(IN) 894.49 SUMP EL. 878.10 KF-10-16-72 (KF1) VAULT TOP 884.63 NE-IE.(OUT) 880.21 NE-IE.(OUT) 877.71 SE-IE.(OUT) 877.71 NW-IE.(IN) 880.21 EX CBMH TC. 896.89 NW-IE.(IN) 882.10 SE-IE.(OUT) 882.10 3 LF - 15" HDPE @ 1.40% 48" MH TC. 896.25 SE-IE.(OUT) 880.29 NW-IE.(IN) 880.29 15" HDPE 45° ELBOW PLUG VALVE & BOX TC. 896.73 NW-IE.(IN) 880.36 SE-IE.(OUT) 880.36 SUMP EL. 880.36 4" PVC DRAIN TILE W/ END CAP REPLACE STRUCTURE, CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPES (CITY PROJ. NO. 20-05) 870 875 880 885 890 895 900 870 875 880 885 890 895 900 0+00 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 1+50 1+75 2+00 2+20 EX MCES SAN (66" RCP) STA = 1+58.35 TOP = 874.81 BOT = 868.23 KF-10-16-72 (KF1) VAULT TOP 884.63 NE-IE.(OUT) 880.21 NE-IE.(OUT) 877.71 SE-IE.(OUT) 877.71 NW-IE.(IN) 880.21 0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+25 1+50 1+75 2+00 24 LF - 15" HDPE @ 1.00% EX STMH TC. 885.00 N-IE.(IN) 874.80 S-IE.(OUT) 874.80 NE-IE.(IN) 875.87 STA=1+58.35 EL. 876.25 140 LF - 15" HDPE @ 1.00% 7 LF - 15" HDPE @ 1.00% EX 48" RCP EX CBMH TC. 886.08 N-IE.(IN) 879.50 S-IE.(OUT) 879.50 EX 48" RCP EX STMH TC. 891.84 NW-IE.(IN) 879.90 S-IE.(OUT) 879.90 EX 48" RCP 48" MH TC. 891.48 S-IE.(OUT) 877.45 NW-IE.(IN) 877.45 48" MH TC. 884.82 N-IE.(IN) 876.00 SW-IE.(OUT) 876.00 NEW MH-8541 (72") R-4342 ASSY TC. 886.30 REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No.Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 2/4/2021 GGN - - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STORM SEWER AND WATER QUALITY TREATMENT PLAN AND PROFILES 23/27-0053.14 TO28B C-01 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_C-01.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:24 PMSuite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 SCALE IN FEET 40200 N1 - PLAN: 3 - PROFILE: STORM OUTFLOW PRETREATMENT/FILTRATION 2 - PROFILE: STORM INFLOW PRETREATMENT/FILTRATION RICE MARSH POND DAK O T A L A N E 3 - 2 - EX STOOL GRATE INLET EX STORM SEWER SCALE IN FEET 100 20 SCALE IN FEET 100 20 PROPERTY PARCEL LINE, TYP. STORM OUTFLOW ALIGNMENT SEE PROFILE STORM INFLOW ALIGNMENT SEE PROFILE EXISTING GRADE EXISTING GRADE CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE PRECAST PRETREATMENT/FILTRATION STRUCTURES W/ACCESS AT GRADE PER MANUFACTURER EXISTING MET COUNCIL SANITARY SEWER INTERCEPTOR SEE PLAN FOR ACCESS MANHOLES(5) SEE PLAN FOR ACCESS MANHOLES(5) REPLACE EXISTING STRUCTURE WITH BMP STRUCTURE W/ SUMP (TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY STREET PROJECT) CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 EDGE OF WOODS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. REPLACE EX. CBMH, SEE SALVAGE CITY PARK SIGN 45° ELBOW 12" NYLOPLAST STRUCTURE 4" SLOTTED PVC4" P V C CLEAN OUT W/CAP REMOVABLE CAP GENERAL NOTES: 1.TOPO AND CONTROL GROUND SURVEY CONDUCTED BY BARR ENGINEERING IN 2019 IN MINNESOTA STATE PLANE SOUTH ZONE FEET PROJECTION. 2.AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY NEARMAP DATED APRIL 2020. 3.PARCELS LINES PROVIDED BY CARVER COUNTY GIS DATABASE. BOUNDARIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND FOR REFERENCE ONLY. 4.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO LOCATE AND FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO WORK. POTHOLE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE EARTHWORK BEGINS. 5.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA MUTCD, INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. ALL SIGNS PLACED SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 6.ALL EXISTING ROADS, PARKING LOTS, TRAILS, FENCES, SIGNS, OR SIMILAR SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE WITH ALL PARTIES TO DOCUMENT PRE-CONSTRUCTION/EXISTING FEATURES TO ENSURE DAMAGE IS AVOIDED. IF PAVEMENT IS DAMAGED DURING WORK, PATCHING WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT PRICE. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING WORK THROUGH CONSTRUCTION. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO STREET SWEEPING EQUIPMENT AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE AWARE OF WEATHER CONDITIONS AND SWEEP ANY STREETS PRIOR TO ANY RAINFALL EVENT. STOCKPILING MATERIALS ON THE STREET SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. 9.ALL GROUND DISTURBANCE GENERATED FROM GRADING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED AND RESTORED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SEED W/COVER CROP AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. THE TOPSOIL USED FOR RESTORATION MAY BE STOCKPILED FROM GRADING AREAS. 10.GROUND DISTURBANCE SHALL BE CONFINED TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. ALL GROUND DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 11.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, FINAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND STAKED IN THE FIELD. 12.CLEARING AND GRUBBING TO BE PERFORMED ONLY WITHIN GRADING LIMITS UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OR OWNER. 13.TREES TO BE REMOVED WILL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD BY ENGINEER. ALL REMAINING TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED. 14.TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST ROOT COMPACTION, DAMAGE AND DISFIGUREMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT SPEC. 2572. PROTECTION OF THESE TREES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSFER OF AQUATIC AND TERRESTRIAL INVASIVE SPECIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 16.COMPACTED SOIL MUST BE DECOMPACTED TO A SOIL COMPACTION TESTING PRESSURE OF LESS THAN 1,400 KILOPASCALS OF 20 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH IN THE UPPER 12 INCHES OF SOIL. INTERCONNECT PIPES BETWEEN FILTER STRUCTURES 4" S L O T T E D P V C 3 - PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES AS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN GV 24" 2" Oak 12" 18" 18" Light Pole 15" 12" 12" 36" Birch" clump-5 15" 8" 876.2 W.S. 2019/11/12 XXXXSSS S S S SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N S A N SANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN897895 890 887895 880885890895 885891 892 891 892 0 10 20 300-10-20-30 895 900 895 900 0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+400+10 0+20 0+30 REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No.Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 2/4/2021 GGN - - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA GRADING AND PAVEMENT RESTORATION PLAN, PROFILE AND SECTIONS 23/27-0053.14 TO28B C-02 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_C-02.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:24 PMSuite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 SCALE IN FEET 40200 N1 - PLAN: GRADING AND DRAINAGE 4 - SECTION: RAIN GARDEN OVERFLOW GRADINGRICE MARSH POND DAKO T A L A N E HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET 100 20 AMENDED SOIL AREA FOR RUNOFF REDUCTION SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN L-01 PROPERTY PARCEL LINE, TYP. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES AS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN EXISTING MET COUNCIL SANITARY SEWER INTERCEPTOR RAIN GARDEN OVERFLOW OUTLET EL. 897.0 CURB CUT FLOW LINE EL. 897.0 EXISTING GRADE CURB INLET AND SPLASH BLOCK ASSEMBLY, SEE DWG C-03 FINAL GRADE PROPOSED FINAL GRADING TO PROMOTE SHEET FLOW OVER AMENDED SOIL AREA 4 - 3 - SECTION: RAIN GARDEN BASIN GRADING SCALE IN FEET 100 20 EXISTING GRADE FINAL GRADE MIN. RIM EL. 897.3 OVERFLOW EL. 897.0 BASIN BOT. EL. 896.0 3H:1V3H:1V CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 3 - RAIN GARDEN BASIN GRADING SECTION SEE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. 0 VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET 1 2 TRAIL PED RAMP, SEE CITY STD PLT ON DRAWING XXX GENERAL NOTES: 1.TOPO AND CONTROL GROUND SURVEY CONDUCTED BY BARR ENGINEERING IN 2019 IN MINNESOTA STATE PLANE SOUTH ZONE FEET PROJECTION. 2.AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY NEARMAP DATED APRIL 2020. 3.PARCELS LINES PROVIDED BY CARVER COUNTY GIS DATABASE. BOUNDARIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND FOR REFERENCE ONLY. 4.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO LOCATE AND FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO WORK. POTHOLE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE EARTHWORK BEGINS. 5.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINNESOTA MUTCD, INCLUDING FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. ALL SIGNS PLACED SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 6.ALL EXISTING ROADS, PARKING LOTS, TRAILS, FENCES, SIGNS, OR SIMILAR SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE WITH ALL PARTIES TO DOCUMENT PRE-CONSTRUCTION/EXISTING FEATURES TO ENSURE DAMAGE IS AVOIDED. IF PAVEMENT IS DAMAGED DURING WORK, PATCHING WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT PRICE. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING WORK THROUGH CONSTRUCTION. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO STREET SWEEPING EQUIPMENT AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE AWARE OF WEATHER CONDITIONS AND SWEEP ANY STREETS PRIOR TO ANY RAINFALL EVENT. STOCKPILING MATERIALS ON THE STREET SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. 9.ALL GROUND DISTURBANCE GENERATED FROM GRADING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE STABILIZED AND RESTORED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SEED W/COVER CROP AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. THE TOPSOIL USED FOR RESTORATION MAY BE STOCKPILED FROM GRADING AREAS. 10.GROUND DISTURBANCE SHALL BE CONFINED TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. ALL GROUND DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 11.CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, FINAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND STAKED IN THE FIELD. 12.CLEARING AND GRUBBING TO BE PERFORMED ONLY WITHIN GRADING LIMITS UNLESS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OR OWNER. 13.TREES TO BE REMOVED WILL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD BY ENGINEER. ALL REMAINING TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED. 14.TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST ROOT COMPACTION, DAMAGE AND DISFIGUREMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT SPEC. 2572. PROTECTION OF THESE TREES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSFER OF AQUATIC AND TERRESTRIAL INVASIVE SPECIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 16.COMPACTED SOIL MUST BE DECOMPACTED TO A SOIL COMPACTION TESTING PRESSURE OF LESS THAN 1,400 KILOPASCALS OF 20 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH IN THE UPPER 12 INCHES OF SOIL. RAIN GARDEN OVERFLOW GRADING SECTION SEE REMOVE/REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVED TRAIL REMOVE/REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVED TRAIL PROTECT BITUMINOUS PAVED TRAIL DURING CONSTRUCTION NEW B612 CURB & GUTTER FINAL GRADE CONTOURS, TYP. AMENDED SOIL AREA FOR RUNOFF REDUCTION SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN L-01 PROTECT EX. FENCE 2 - SECTION: STONE SPLASH BLOCK ASSEMBLY AT CURB INLET OPENING NOT TO SCALE STEPBLOCK EDGE BLOCK COMPACTED CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BOTTOM OF BASIN ELEV. VARIES PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE 3' 16" 3" 12" (SEE NOTE 1.) RAIN GARDEN STORAGE ELEVATION 12" BELOW GUTTER FLOWLINE AT INLET STRUCTURE NEENAH CURB OPENING R-3262-4 3 - PROFILE: CURB OPENING INLET (N.I.C.) NOT TO SCALE 10'-0" 4'-4"1'-4"4'-4" 1'-4"'1'-4"3'-0"3'-0" NEENAH CURB OPENING R-3262-4 4"6"6"4" EXISTING 4" SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB EXISTING 4" SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB TRANSITION SEDIMENT SUMP 6'-8" 5 - ISOMETRIC: STONE SPLASH BLOCK ASSEMBLY AT CURB INLET OPENING NOT TO SCALE NEENAH CURB OPENING, WITH R-3262-4 CASTING CONCRETE CURB TRANSITION CONCRETE CURB TRANSITION 4"BOTTOM OF RAIN GARDEN B618 CONCRETE GUTTER SEDIMENT SUMP FINISHED SOIL LEVEL #4 REBAR SEE 9"9" EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT 0.5" DRILLED HOLE IN STRUCTURE, #4 REBAR THROUGH HOLES AND INTO SURROUNDING CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURBING 4 - 4 - DETAIL: REINFORCEMENT FOR CURB OPENING INLET (N.I.C.) NOT TO SCALE 9"9"1'-0"1'-0" NEENAH CURB OPENING R-3262-4 #4 REBAR #4 REBAR 4" 1.5" MIN 4" CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB TRANSITION CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB TRANSITION CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB TRANSITION 2" 3" 3" 6" 1 - PLAN: CURB OPENING INLET WITH STONE SPLASH BLOCK ASSEMBLY NOT TO SCALE NEENAH CURB OPENING R-3262-4 EXISTING 4" SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT STEPBLOCK EDGE BLOCK SEDIMENT SUMP BOTTOM OF BASIN ELEV. VARIES 4'-0" 6'-8" 4'-0" 3' BENCH 3'-0" TOP OF CURB FACE OF CURB GUTTER FLOWFLOW REBAR SHALL NOT IMPEDE OPENING OF INLET STRUCTURE 10'-0" 1.5" MIN 6" 4" STANDARD BLOCK: 6" X 12" X 16" 2 - REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No.Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 2/4/2021 GGN - - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CURB INLET AND SPLASH BLOCK ASSEMBLY PLAN, SECTION AND DETAIL 23/27-0053.14 TO28B C-03 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_C-03.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:25 PMSuite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 NOTE: 1.DESIGN DEPTH TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON INFILTRATION TESTING RESULTS. INSTALLATION OF CURB & GUTTER AND INLET CASTING SHOWN TO COMPLETED BY CITY OF CHANHASSEN STREET PROJECT SEE CITY STANDARD PLATE NO. 3106 INSTALLATION OF CURB & GUTTER AND INLET CASTING SHOWN TO COMPLETED BY CITY OF CHANHASSEN STREET PROJECT SEE CITY STANDARD PLATE NO. 3106 B618 CONCRETE GUTTER INSTALLATION OF CURB & GUTTER AND INLET CASTING SHOWN TO COMPLETED BY CITY OF CHANHASSEN STREET PROJECT SEE CITY STANDARD PLATE NO. 3106 4" SLOTTED PVC IN SAND TRENCH TO DRAIN DETAIL: SILT FENCE - MACHINE SLICED - 4 NOT TO SCALE DOWNSTREAM VIEW SECTION VIEW24" MIN.EMBED POST5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POST AT 4 FT. MAX. SPACING (STEEL) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" MIN. MACHINE SLICE 8" TO 12" DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP) GRADE PLASTIC ZIP TIES (MIN. 50 LBS TENSILE STRENGTH) ON TOP 8" MIN. 3 PER POST RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION MACHINE SLICE 8"-12" DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP) MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE PER MN/DOT STD. SPECIFICATION 3886, INSTALL PER MN/DOT STD. SPEC. 2573 4' MAX. (TYP.) NOTES: 1.INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO ANY GRADING WORK IN THE AREA TO BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. REMOVE SILT FENCE AND ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINAL GRADING AND SITE STABILIZATION. 2.SILT FENCE MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS 2573 AND 3886. 3.NO HOLES OR GAPS SHALL BE PRESENT IN/UNDER SILT FENCE. PREPARE AREA AS NEEDED TO SMOOTH SURFACE OR REMOVE DEBRIS. 4.REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WHEN BUILD UP REACHES 1/3 OF FENCE HEIGHT. OR INSTALL A SECOND SILT FENCE DOWNSTREAM OF THE ORIGINAL FENCE AT A SUITABLE DISTANCE. 5.WHEN SPLICES ARE NECESSARY MAKE SPLICE AT POST ACCORDING TO SPLICE DETAIL. PLACE THE END POST OF THE SECOND FENCE INSIDE THE END POST OF THE FIRST FENCE. ROTATE BOTH POSTS TOGETHER AT LEAST 180 DEGREES TO CREATE A TIGHT SEAL WITH THE FABRIC MATERIAL. CUT THE FABRIC NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE POSTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE 6 INCH FLAP, THEN DRIVE BOTH POSTS AND BURY THE FLAP AND COMPACT BACKFILL. FLOW SEDIMENT LOG WOOD STAKE 16" MINIMUMSEDIMENT LOG WOOD STAKE WOOD STAKE TO ONLY PENETRATE NETTING 16" MINIMUMSIDE VIEW FLAT FRONT VIEW FLOW SEDIMENT LOG SIDE VIEW ON SLOPE 16" MINIMUM12" MINIMUM TOP VIEW WOOD STAKE OVERLAP ENDS NOTES: 1.INSTALL SEDIMENT LOG ALONG CONTOURS (CONSTANT ELEVATION). 2.NO GAPS SHALL BE PRESENT UNDER SEDIMENT LOG. PREPARE AREA AS NEEDED TO SMOOTH SURFACE OR REMOVE DEBRIS. 3.REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WHEN REACHING 1/3 OF LOG HEIGHT. 4.MAINTAIN SEDIMENT LOG THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AND REPAIR OR REPLACED AS REQUIRED. 4 2 6 2 3A 3B SLOPE INSTALLATION FLOW NOTES: 1.REFER TO MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STAPLE PATTERNS FOR SLOPE INSTALLATIONS. 2.PREPARE SOIL BY LOOSENING TOP 1-2 INCHES AND APPLY SEED (AND FERTILIZER WHERE REQUIRED) PRIOR TO INSTALLING BLANKETS. GROUND SHOULD BE SMOOTH AND FREE OF DEBRIS. 3.BEGIN (A) AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE AND ROLL THE BLANKETS DOWN OR (B) AT ONE END OF THE SLOPE AND ROLL THE BLANKETS HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. 4.THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP, WITH THE UPHILL BLANKET ON TOP. 5.WHEN BLANKETS MUST BE SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE, PLACE BLANKETS END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" APART. 6.BLANKET MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED OR AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. 2 - DETAIL: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - INSTALLATION NOT TO SCALE DETAIL: EROSION LOG - STAKING - 3 NOT TO SCALE REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No. Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 4/12/2021 GGN - - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA EROSION CONTROL SECTIONS AND DETAILS 23/27-0053.14 TO28B C-04 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_C-04_C-05_C-06 DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:28 PMSuite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 CITY STANDARD PLATE 5302A5 NOT TO SCALE- CITY STANDARD PLATE 53011 NOT TO SCALE- DETAIL: NON-RIGID STORM SEWER TRENCH1 NOT TO SCALE- SPRING LINE HAUNCHING 6" BEDDING 1.IMPORTED PIPE EMBEDMENT MATERIAL PER MnDOT SPEC. 3149.2F GRANULAR BEDDING, 100% PASSING THE 1" SIEVE AND NOT MORE THAN 10.5% WILL PASS THE #200 SIEVE. 2.IMPORTED PIPE EMBEDMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED IN UNIFORM LIFTS, 8" OR LESS IN DEPTH, LOOSE MEASURE, TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY FROM THE BEDDING TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF AT LEAST 12" ABOVE THE CROWN OF THE PIPE.PIPE EMBEDMENT(IMPORTED MATERIAL)FINAL BACKFILL INITIAL BACKFILL MIN. TRENCH WIDTH (SEE TABLE) PIPE DIAM.MIN. TRENCH WIDTH SEE SPECIFICATION FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS 12"INCHES INCHES 4 21 6 23 8 26 10 28 12 30 15 34 18 39 24 48 30 56 36 64 42 72 48 80 54 88 60 96 SUITABLE FOUNDATION (MAY NOT BE REQUIRED) DETAIL: TREE PROTECTION FENCING NOT TO SCALE 2 - PLACE FENCE AT DRIP LINE OR APPROVED MINIMUM DISTANCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE POST 6' MAX.TREE DRIP LINE TREE DRIP LINE CITY STANDARD PLATE 31023 NOT TO SCALE- CITY STANDARD PLATE 31104 NOT TO SCALE- REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No.Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 4/12/2021 GGN - - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND CITY STANDARD PLATES 23/27-0053.14 TO28B C-05 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_C-04_C-05_C-06 DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:28 PMSuite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 CITY STANDARD PLATE 52031 NOT TO SCALE- CITY STANDARD PLATE 52163 NOT TO SCALE- CITY STANDARD PLATE 5215B2 NOT TO SCALE- CITY STANDARD PLATE 5215C4 NOT TO SCALE- REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No.Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 4/12/2021 GGN - - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CITY STANDARD PLATES 23/27-0053.14 TO28B C-06 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_C-04_C-05_C-06 DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:28 PMSuite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_C-07_C08 KRAKEN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/23/2021 10:37 PMNOTE: CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THE MANUFACTURES REPRESENTATIVE SUPERVISE THE INSTALLATION OF THIS PROPRIETARY STRUCTURAL BMP CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_C-07_C08 KRAKEN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/23/2021 10:37 PMNOTE: CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE THE MANUFACTURES REPRESENTATIVE SUPERVISE THE INSTALLATION OF THIS PROPRIETARY STRUCTURAL BMP 897.6 Hydrant GV 24" 2" Oak 12" 18" 18" 36" Birch" clump-5 15" 879.3 Pipe 876.2 W.S. 2019/11/12 873.5 F.E.S. 60" RCPXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No.Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 4/6/2021 MDB3 GGN - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STORM FILTER AND SOIL AMENDMENT LANDSCAPE PLAN 23/27-0053.14 TO28B L-01 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_L-01.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:30 PMSCALE IN FEET 40200 N Suite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 1 - PLAN: DAKOTA LANECONSTRUCTION LIMITS, TYP. SOIL AMENDMENT PROFILE "B" (7,650 SF) - SEE DETAIL 5/L-02. SEED AND PLANT WITH NATIVE MIX AND APPLY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. SOIL AMENDMENT PROFILE "A" (6,355 SF) - SEE DETAIL 4/L-02. SEED WITH BEE LAWN MIX AND APPLY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 PROPERTY PARCEL LINE, TYP. TREE PROTECTION FENCING AT DRIP LINE FOR ALL TREES WITHIN WORK AREA, TYP. LANDSCAPE EDGER 2' FROM PROPERTY LINE RESEED DISTURBANCE AREA WITH BEE LAWN. RAIN GARDEN. SEE 55' LANDSCAPE EDGER AT RAIN GARDEN SPLASH BLOCK ASSEMBLY BOTTOM OF BASIN PLANT MIX, CLUSTER IN GROUPS OF 5-7 PLANTS N- PLAN: RAIN GARDEN SCALE IN FEET 100 20 PLANTING NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE UTILITIES LOCATED PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE DURING PLANTING INSTALLATION. 2.PROTECT EXISTING AND PROPOSED CURBS, PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER SITE ELEMENTS FROM IMPACT BY SOIL PREPARATION AND PLANTING OPERATIONS. AVOID COMPACTING SOIL WITH HEAVY EQUIPMENT. ANY DAMAGE TO SITE TO BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3.PROTECT PLANTS AT SITE FROM STRESS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION BY PLACING IN SHADE, HEELING IN TO MULCH, WATERING, AND OTHER APPROPRIATE MEASURES. 4.STAKE OR OTHERWISE LAYOUT ALL PROPOSED PLANT BEDS AS SHOWN ON PLAN, DETAILS, AND PLANT SCHEDULE. SOME FIELD ADJUSTMENT MAY BE NECESSARY. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO REVIEW PLANT LAYOUT PRIOR TO PLANTING. INFORM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF PLANTING TWO DAYS PRIOR TO PLANT DELIVERY. 5.NATIVE PLANTING AREA SHALL BE SEEDED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET PLACED, AND PLUGS PLANTED THROUGH THE BLANKET. 6.PLUGS SHALL BE PLANTED IN CLUSTERS OF 5-7 PLANTS PER SPECIES AND STAGGERED THROUGHOUT NATIVE PLANTING AREA. 7.PLACE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (MN/DOT SPEC 3882.2 TYPE 6 - WEED SEED FREE SHREDDED HARDWOOD.) TO A DEPTH OF 3" WITHIN RAIN GARDEN. 8.THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTINGS AFTER INSTALLATION. 9.NO RUBBER TIRED EQUIPMENT IN BASIN AFTER LOOSENING. LOW GROUND PRESSURE TRACKED EQUIPMENT ONLY. 10.ANY COMPACTION OF PREVIOUSLY LOOSENED SOIL MUST BE RELOOSENED. 11.ALL TURF AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BE RESTORED TO CITY SATISFACTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DECOMPACTION, MINIMUM 6" OF TOPSOIL, AND SODDING. FOR SOIL AMENDMENT AREAS SEE DETAILS ON L-02. 12.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING PLANTS THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. LITTLE BLUESTEM ZONE, INTERMIXED WITH FORBS SPECIES IN GROUPS OF 3 PRAIRIE DROPSEED ZONE, INTERMIXED WITH FORBS IN GROUPS OF 3 1 4 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 4 " 2 L-01 2 - LANDSCAPE EDGER 2' FROM EDGE OF TRAIL 2' STRIP OF BEE LAWN BETWEEN EDGER AND TRAIL REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO.CHK.TO/FOR RELEASED DATE RELEASED Approved Designed Drawn Checked Date Scale DWG. No. BARR PROJECT No. CLIENT PROJECT No. REV. No.Minneapolis, Minnesota Ph: 1-800-632-2277 Corporate Headquarters: DATE LICENSE # SIGNATURE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BARR ENGINEERING CO. Project Office: PRINTED NAME AS SHOWN 4/6/2021 MDB3 GGN - - RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT RICE MARSH LAKE WQ TREATMENT CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STORM FILTER AND SOIL AMENDMENT LANDSCAPE SECTIONS AND DETAILS 23/27-0053.14 TO28B L-02 B.. 90% DESIGN REVIEW .CADD USER: Greg Nelson FILE: M:\DESIGN\23270053.14\23270053.14_TO28_L-01.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 5/27/2021 4:30 PMSuite 200 4300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVE Fax: (952) 832-2601 www.barr.com Ph: 1-800-632-2277 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435 CLIENT BID CONSTRUCTION RECORD 4/19/20215/26/2021----- ------- ------- ------- ------- A B C 0 1 2 3 2 DETAIL: PERENNIAL PLANTING - RAIN GARDEN NOT TO SCALE 3" DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH BACKFILL PLANTING SOIL SUBGRADE PERENNIAL PLANTING NOTES: 1.PROVIDE AND INSTALL PLANTS PER SCHEDULE. 2.REMOVE DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES. RETAIN THE NATURAL FORM OF PLANT. 3.DIG PLANT HOLES 18" MIN. LARGER THAN ROOT MASS, ALL SIDES. 4.SET PLANT ON LIGHTLY FIRMED BACKFILL SOIL AT THE SAME DEPTH GROWN IN THE NURSERY. 5.BACK FILL WITH PLANTING SOIL FIRM SOIL AROUND ROOT MASS TO MAINTAIN PLUMB AND ENSURE NO AIR GAPS AROUND ROOT MASS. 6.CONSTRUCT 3" WATERING BASIN. THOROUGHLY WATER WITHIN 3 HOURS OF INSTALLATION. 7.APPLY 3" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO ENTIRE PLANTING AREA (SOIL PREPARED AS PER PLAN). 8.NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH PLANT. 9.WATER THOROUGHLY AFTER PLANTING. 10.CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING PLANTS (REGARDLESS OF NOTIFICATION) DURING ENTIRE 60 DAY WARRANTY PERIOD. WATERING WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. - SOIL AMENDMENT NOTES: SOIL AMENDMENT PROFILE "A" - LOOSENING AND COMPOST APPLICATION Prior to Final Stabilization: 1.Soil loosening & amendment requirement applies to all areas as shown on plans (not including areas under existing tree drip-lines or within 5-feet of building foundations), to restore soil permeability. 2.Soil remediation (loosening & amendment) must be implemented prior to any installation of irrigation system components, trees, shrubs, sod and/or seed. No wheeled equipment shall be used on loosened/amended soil - wide-tracked equipment only. 3.Soil remediation (loosening & amendment) must preserve existing trees. No remediation shall occur within dripline of all existing trees. 3.All disturbed areas to be revegetated (sod/seed and landscaping) shall have 8-inch minimum depth of soil loosening (e.g. soil ripping, 6-inch max. tooth spacing) and 3-inch minimum depth of MnDOT 3890 Grade 2 Compost incorporated into the top 6-inch depth of soil to restore soil permeability. Typical application rate is 50 cubic yards/10,000 square feet of MnDOT 3890 Grade 2 compost. Salvaged topsoil by itself does not count toward 5% soil organic content target. 4.Loosened/amended soils shall have a maximum of 200 psi in top 8-inches (inserting a 12-inch wire flag, by hand to depth) and a minimum of 5% organic content in top 6-inches of soil (visually black soil). Salvaged topsoil by itself does not count toward 5% soil organic target. 5.Implementation documentation shall be provided to Engineer to verify approved soil management strategy compliance. Documentation includes but is not limited to: photos/video of implementation, on-site soil samples, compost haul tickets, compaction testing, and soil organic content test results from vendor. Soil organic testing of final soil condition may be required by Engineer, if in question. Engineer is available prior to implementation to discuss necessary steps for compliance. 6.Contractor shall provide minimum of 24-hour notice to Engineer to arrange inspection of soil loosening/amendment process to verify soil remediation compliance. SOIL AMENDMENT PROFILE "B" - LOOSENING ONLY Prior to Final Stabilization: 1.Soil loosening applies to all areas as noted on the plans (not including areas under existing tree drip-lines or within 5-feet of building foundations), to restore soil permeability. 2.Soil remediation (loosening)) must be implemented prior to any installation of irrigation system components, trees, shrubs, sod and/or seed. No wheeled equipment shall be used on loosened/amended soil - wide-tracked equipment only. 3.Soil remediation (loosening) must preserve existing trees. No remediation shall occur within dripline of all existing trees. 3.All disturbed areas to be revegetated (sod/seed and landscaping) shall have 8-inch minimum depth of soil loosening (e.g. soil ripping, 6-inch max. tooth spacing). 4.Loosened/amended soils shall have a maximum of 200 psi in top 8-inches (inserting a 12-inch wire flag, by hand to depth). 5.Implementation documentation shall be provided to Engineer to verify approved soil management strategy compliance. Documentation includes but is not limited to: photos/video of implementation, on-site soil samples, compost haul tickets, compaction testing, and soil organic content test results from vendor. Engineer is available prior to implementation to discuss necessary steps for compliance. 6.Contractor shall provide minimum of 24-hour notice to Engineer to arrange inspection of soil loosening process to verify soil remediation compliance. CURB OPENING WITH INLET STRUCTURE,SEE C-05 1 - SECTION: RAIN GARDEN NOT TO SCALE BOTTOM OF BASIN 18" MIN. SOIL LOOSENING, TYP. 4" STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGING 12" MIN. RAIN GARDEN PLANTING SOIL EXISTING ASPHALT STREET EXISTING SOIL LEVEL 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WASHED MnDOT FINE FILTER AGGREGATE SUBGRADE SOIL LOOSENING 4" SLOTTED PVC COLLECTION PIPE. NO SOCK. EXISTING SUBSOIL 3 DETAIL: PERENNIAL PLANTING - NATIVE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET BACKFILL PLANTING SOIL SUBGRADE PERENNIAL PLANTING NOTES: 1.PROVIDE AND INSTALL PLANTS PER SCHEDULE. 2.REMOVE DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES. RETAIN THE NATURAL FORM OF PLANT. 3.PREPARE SOIL PER SOIL AMENDMENT NOTES. 4.SEED AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 5.THROUGH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, DIG PLANT HOLES 18" MIN. LARGER THAN ROOT MASS, ALL SIDES. 6.SET PLANT ON LIGHTLY FIRMED BACKFILL SOIL AT THE SAME DEPTH GROWN IN THE NURSERY. 7.BACK FILL WITH PLANTING SOIL FIRM SOIL AROUND ROOT MASS TO MAINTAIN PLUMB AND ENSURE NO AIR GAPS AROUND ROOT MASS. 8.THOROUGHLY WATER WITHIN 3 HOURS OF INSTALLATION. 9.CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING PLANTS (REGARDLESS OF NOTIFICATION) DURING ENTIRE 60 DAY WARRANTY PERIOD. WATERING WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT. -..12" MAX TOOTH SPACING REMOVE AND DISPOSE SOD RIP SOIL TO 8" MINIMUM DEPTH .RIP COMPOST INTO TOP 6" STEP 1 - REMOVE SOD STEP 2 - RIP TO 8" MIN. DEPTH STEP 3 - AMEND TOP 6" STEP 4 - LEVEL SURFACE AND VEGETATE 4 DETAIL: SOIL AMENDMENT PROFILE "A" NOT TO SCALE- NOTE: SOIL AMENDMENT DETAILS AND NOTES BASED ON CITY OF EAGAN SOIL STRATEGY .REMOVE AND DISPOSE SOD RIP SOIL TO 8" MINIMUM DEPTH STEP 1 - REMOVE SOD STEP 2 - RIP TO 8" MIN. DEPTH STEP 3 - LEVEL SURFACE AND VEGETATE 5 DETAIL: SOIL AMENDMENT PROFILE "B" NOT TO SCALE- 12" MAX TOOTH SPACING. Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2021 2025thru Department Surface Water Management Description In partnership with RPBCWD, this project will install an underground water quality filter system in Rice Marsh Lake Park, just upstream of the existing stormwater pond. RPBCWD is funding the design and construction, while the City will own and maintain the system. Project #SWMP-053 Priority n/a Justification Neither Rice Marsh Lake nor Lake Riley meet MPCA standards for total phosphorous, chlorophyll-a or secchi disc depth readings. This watershed contributes the largest total phosphorous load to Rice Marsh Lake at 232 lbs (or 32% of the entire watershed load to Rice Marsh Lake) and is only one of two watershed with a load greater than 100 lbs/year. This project, once complete, could reduce the load to Rice Marsh Lake by as much as 115 lbs/year (50%). Budget Impact/Other This filtration feature will require some annual maintenance. UsefulLifeProjectNameRiceMarshLakeWaterQualityImprovementProjectCategory SWMP Type Improvement Account #2 Account #1 720-7025-4xxx Total Project Cost:$600,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20212022202320242025Expenditures 600,000600,000Construction 600,000 600,000Total Total20212022202320242025FundingSources 550,000550,000OtherAgencyContribution 50,00050,000SurfaceWaterUtilityFund 600,000 600,000Total 121 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 28, 2021 RESOLUTION NO: 2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT FOR THE RICE MARSH LAKE WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the MPCA has designated Rice Marsh Lake as impaired for aquatic recreation due to excess nutrients; and WHEREAS, the City under its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit is obligated to make efforts to reduce impairments in public water bodies, including Rice Marsh Lake; and WHEREAS, the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) wishes to implement a water quality improvement project to address the impairment, including fully funding the design and construction; and WHEREAS, the project is located on City owned property; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the project, the City shall bear ownership and maintenance responsibilities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, that: The City Council approve the Cooperative Agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for the Rice Marsh Lake Water Quality Improvement Project. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2021. ATTEST: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT PROJECT AREA Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.4.1, 2018-01-17 14:15 File: I:\Client\RPBC_WD\Work_Orders\2017_TO24_SilverLakeWOBMP\Maps\Figure 6-1_SilverLake_BasinBMP.mxd User: EMA EXHIBIT A Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Park Trail RM_12 Pond Construction Extents Existing Sanitary Sewer Existing Manhole Existing Stormsewer Highest Recorded Lake Level Extents (1976-2019) NWI Wetland Boundary ! ! !Normal Water Level Site Survey Contours 5-Foot Contour 1-Foot Contour Parcel Boundary Privately-Owned City-Owned 0 40 8020Feet Highest recorded lake level extent from 1970 to 2019. Tie into existing stormsewer ±Dakota Lanesanitary sewer easement CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Resolution 2021­XX: Establish No Parking Zone for Picha Drive Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.10. Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: TSC Case #145 PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council adopts a Resolution establishing a No Parking Zone on the south side of Picha Drive." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On May 19, 2021 the Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) evaluated a traffic safety concern regarding parked vehicles along Picha Drive (Case #145).  The TSC received concerns of parked vehicles along this short section of public street that were causing conflicts with vehicular circulation and the surrounding business accesses.  After evaluation of the surrounding land use and traffic patterns it is the recommendation of the TSC that the south side of Picha Drive be designated a No Parking Zone. There are multiple loading dock accesses that require large delivery vehicles (e.g. semi­trucks) such as Target's loading dock access at the western end along with Market Square's loading areas to the east.  Additional high traffic generators which have access directly onto Picha Drive are Carver County's Service Center DMV to the north and the West One Addition businesses to the south.  Designating the south side of Picha Drive as a No Parking Zone will provide more adequate spacing for turning movements of larger delivery vehicles which in turn creates less vehicular circulation conflicts with the high volume generators that have direct access onto Picha Drive. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Exhibit CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 28, 2021 RESOLUTION NO: 2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE ENTIRE SOUTH SIDE OF PICHA DRIVE AS A NO PARKING AREA WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §412.221, Subd. 6 the City has the power to by ordinance to regulate the use of streets within the City, and WHEREAS, City Code section 12-13 authorizes the City to designate certain streets or portions of streets as no parking zones and provides that no person shall stop or park a vehicle in a no parking zone, and; WHEREAS, the City desires to provide safe and effective transportation access to all areas in the city of Chanhassen; and WHEREAS, due to the location of Picha Drive in relation to the surrounding land uses and existing business accesses, vehicular circulation conflicts have been documented when there are parked vehicles on the south side of Picha Drive; and WHEREAS, the Traffic Safety Committee has evaluated the surrounding land use and traffic patterns and finds that the traffic circulation conflicts exist and recommends no parking of vehicles on the south side of Picha Drive; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council that no on- street parking be allowed on the south side of Picha Drive and that the City Public Works Director is directed to mark by appropriate signage or painting, and the County Sheriff is directed to enforce, the designated no parking area for Picha Drive. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2021. ATTEST: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Appointment of Ryan Soller to the Economic Development Commission Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.11. Prepared By Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council appoints Ryan Soller to the Economic Development Commission for a one­year term ending April 1, 2022.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND In June, 2021, Commissioner Kathleen Donovan resigned from the Economic Development Commission. Mr. Soller previously interviewed for commission appointment and expressed interest in being appointed to the EDC. The city recently advertised for additional interest and appointed the two candidates who applied at that time.  CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Resolution 2021­XX: Accept a Memorial Donation from the Family of Senior Center Patron, Martha Walker Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.12. Prepared By Mary Blazanin, Senior Center Coordinator File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council accepts a donation of $1,000 from Tim and Lori Walker in memory of their mother, Martha Walker, to be applied to social and luncheon programs offered through the Chanhassen Senior Center in 2021. Furthermore, staff is directed to prepare correspondence from the City thanking Martha Walker's family for this generous donation.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND Martha Walker was an avid, enthusiastic supporter and participant of programs and events at the Chanhassen Senior Center. She rarely missed a Bridge game, attended every in­house luncheon she could, and traveled along with us to many performances, concerts and tours. Her family noted in their donation letter, "The Senior Center was a large part of Martha's life, especially in the later years. She raved how much she enjoyed the programs offered and the help she received. She insisted on living independently in her later years, and I believe it was so she could visit the senior center (often). That's how integral it was to her life. Thanks very much to you and your team."  The Senior Center is honored to be recognized with this memorial gift from the Walker family.  RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached resolution accepting a $1,000 donation from Tim and Lori Walker to apply toward social and luncheon programs offered through the Chanhassen Senior Center in 2021. Additionally, staff will prepare a letter of thanks to the Walker Family for including our Senior program in their memorials for Martha, and for their generous donation.  ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 28, 2021 RESOLUTION NO: 2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION TO THE SENIOR CENTER FROM TIM AND LORI WALKER IN MEMORY OF THEIR MOTHER, MARTHA WALKER WHEREAS, Martha Walker was an avid, enthusiastic supporter and participant of programs and events at the Chanhassen Senior Center; and WHEREAS, Martha rarely missed a Bridge game, attended every in-house luncheon she could, and traveled along with us to many performances, concerts and tours; and WHEREAS, Martha’s family noted in their donation letter, "The Senior Center was a large part of Martha's life, especially in the later years. She raved how much she enjoyed the programs offered and the help she received. She insisted on living independently in her later years, and I believe it was so she could visit the senior center (often). That's how integral it was to her life. Thanks very much to you and your team;” and WHEREAS, The Senior Center is honored to be recognized with this memorial gift from the Walker family. BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL hereby accepts the $1,000 donation from Tim and Lori Walker to be applied to social and luncheon programs offered through the Chanhassen Senior Center in 2021. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff is directed to prepare correspondence thanking Martha Walker’s family for their generous donation. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2021. ATTEST: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Approve Lease Agreement Amendment No. 1 with Verizon Wireless for Water Tower No. 2 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the 1st Amendment to the Site Lease Agreement with Verizon Wireless for the purpose of adding three additional cellular antennas on Water Tower No. 2 located at the Minnetonka Middle School.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On July 8, 2019, the City Council approved a lease agreement with Verizon Wireless at Water Tower No. 2 to install antennas and equipment at the site. DISCUSSION Verizon desires to add three cellular antennas and radios to this site and has agreed to provide additional compensation to the City in order to facilitate this additional equipment. The compensation will be increased $900 per month ($10,800 annually) per the agreement.  This rate is commensurate with the rate being paid for the existing antennas on the tower. All expenditures by the third party inspection staff associated with the review and inspection of the new equipment will be borne by Verizon. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve this amendment to the lease agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement Original Lease Agreement Tenant Site Name: New Build – MIN Hilbert A Tenant Location #: 443891 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMUNICATION SITE LEASE AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMMUNICATION SITE LEASE AGREEMENT (the “First Amendment”) is made and shall be effective, as of the last date of the signatures below (“Effective Date”), between the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Landlord”) and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Tenant”). Landlord and Tenant (or their predecessors in interest) entered into that certain Communication Site Lease Agreement dated September 26, 2019, as may have been previously amended and/or assigned (the “Lease”), pursuant to which Tenant is leasing from Landlord a portion of that certain property located on Hazeltine Boulevard, in the City of Chanhassen, County of Carver, State of Minnesota, as more particularly described in the Lease. Landlord and Tenant may be referenced in this First Amendment individually as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this First Amendment, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties agree to amend the Lease as follows: 1. Tenant shall be allowed to make the equipment additions or removals necessary to configure Tenant’s equipment as shown on Attachment A, attached hereto. For all purposes under the Lease as amended hereby, the descriptions and specifications of Tenant’s equipment set forth in the Lease, including, without limitation, any equipment descriptions and specifications with respect to Tenant’s equipment set forth in any schedules, exhibits or attachments to the Lease, are hereby deleted and replaced with the specifications of Tenant’s equipment described in Attachment A, attached hereto. 2. Effective upon the first day of the month following the date Tenant commences installation of the equipment modifications contemplated under this First Amendment, annual rent for the current lease year shall be increased by $10,800.00 and shall continue to be paid in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. 3. Unless otherwise provided herein, all defined terms shall have the same meaning as ascribed to such terms in the Lease. 4. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this First Amendment and the Lease, the terms of this First Amendment shall govern and control. 5. Except as otherwise provided for in this First Amendment, the Lease shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the original terms of the Lease. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW] Tenant Site Name: New Build – MIN Hilbert A Tenant Location #: 443891 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment is effective and entered into as of the date last written below: LANDLORD: City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: ________________________ Name: ________________________ Title: ________________________ Date: ________________________ TENANT: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: ________________________ Name: ________________________ Title: ________________________ Date: ________________________ Tenant Site Name: New Build – MIN Hilbert A Tenant Location #: 443891 3 ATTACHMENT A SPECIFICATIONS EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: Added (3) Air 6449 Final (6) Antenna ‐ JMA MX06FIT (3) Air 6449 (3) radios 4449 (3) 8843 (3) OVP boxes 6627 (1) at each sector (6) 6x12 hybrid trunk Tenant Site I.D. #: MIN Hilbert Landlord's Site Name: High Zone Water Tower Tenant: Verizon Wireless (YAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless COMMUNICATION SITE LEASE AGREEMENT VERIZON WIRELESS (VAW) LLC d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651)452-5000 MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 1 4649706v1 by and between CITY OF CHANHASSEN and Tenant Site I.D. #: MIN Hilbert Landlord's Site Name: High Zone Water Tower Tenant: Verizon Wireless (YAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless COMMUNICATION SITE LEASE AGREEMENT This Communication Site Lease Agreement ("Lease") is entered into and is effective as of the 2(lL day of JvygrA , 20 / 7 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Landlord"), whose address is 7700 Market Blvd, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, and VERIZON WIRELESS (VAW) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS ("Tenant"), with its principal offices at One Verizon Way, Mail Stop 4AW100, Basking Ridge, New Jersey 07920. Recitals WHEREAS, the Landlord is the owner of certain easement property located on Hazeltine Boulevard, Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317, as legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof and shown on the "Site Plan" of the Property attached hereto as Exhibit "B" ("Site Plan") (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Tenant has requested that the Landlord lease space on the Landlord's water tower located on the Property ("Water Tower") for "Tenant's Antennas," "Coaxial Cables," "Hybrid Coaxial Cables," "RRUs," and "Sector Boxes" as shown on the Plans and Specifications hereinafter defined, all jointly hereinafter referred to as "Tower Equipment", a 110 square foot space within the Water Tower, as shown on the Site Plan, hereinafter referred to as the "Leased Premises" for Tenant's related equipment as shown on the Plans and Specifications, hereinafter referred to as "Ground Equipment" subject to all existing easements, together with appurtenant non-exclusive easements for access, utilities and fiber on, over and under the Property, in order MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706v1 2 to install, use, operate, repair, and maintain Tenant's Communication Facility, as hereinafter defined; and WHEREAS, the Landlord agrees to lease to the Tenant space on the Water Tower for Tenant's Tower Equipment, the Leased Premises, and also grant to the Tenant a right of entry over the Property for ingress and egress to the Water Tower, Leased Premises and non-exclusive easements over the Property for Tenant's Coaxial Cables and Utilities, all as shown in the Plans and Specifications, subject to the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease. NOW THEREFORE, for One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1. PROPERTY AND PREMISES. Subject to the following terms, covenants and conditions, Landlord leases to Tenant, (i) space on the Water Tower for Tenant's Tower Equipment as shown on the Plans and Specifications prepared by Designl dated August 16, 2017, and last revised on the 19 day of July, 2018, attached hereto as Exhibit "C" ("Plans and Specifications"), (ii) the Leased Premises for Tenant's Ground Equipment, the Tenant's Tower Equipment and the Leased Premises are hereinafter referred to jointly as the "Tenant's Leased Premises", and (iii) appurtenant non-exclusive easements as legally described on Exhibit "A" and shown on the Site Plan for (a) access on, over and under the Property ("Access Easement"), and (b) Tenant's Utilities ("Utility Easements"). The primary purpose of Landlord's ownership of the Property is to operate and maintain a water tower for the residents of Chanhassen and to provide, operate and maintain communication systems for the Landlord's Fire, Police, Emergency Medical, Public Works and Parks Department needs. 2. TERM . The initial term of this Lease shall be five (5) years ("Initial Term"), commencing on January 1, 2020 (the "Commencement Date"). Tenant shall have the right to M IN Hilbert C hanh assen 4649706vl 3 extend this Lease for four (4) additional five (5) year terms ("Renewal Term"). The Renewal Terms of this Lease shall be on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein except for rental adjustments as provided in Paragraph 3, Rent, below. Thi s Lease shall be automatically renewed for each of the Renewal Terms unless Tenant gives Landlord written notice of Tenant's intention not to renew this Lease at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any applicable Renewal Term. 3. RENT. a. Tenant shall pay Landlord, as rent, the following sum s· at the time stated herein ("Rent")": Based on Tenant's initial installation of the Tenant's Tower Equipment and Ground Equipment, the Landlord leasing to Tenant, (i) space on the Water Tower for the Tenant's Tower Equipment and Ground Equipment, and (ii) the Leased Premises, monthly rent of Two Thousand Three Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($2,300.00). The Rent shall be paid monthly in advance, wi th the first such monthly paym ent (prorated for any partial calendar month) due and payable w ithin sixty (60) days of the C omm encem ent Date. b. T he Rent shall be increased each year on the an ni versar y of th e C om m encem ent Date by tw o percent (2%). c. If this Lease is terminated according to the terms of this Lease and Tenant has prepaid the Rent, the Tenant shall be entitled to a refun d on a prorated, based on a thirty day month, as of the date of termination, if the termination of the Lease is for any reason other than nonpayment of Rent, or Tenant's default, provided that Tenant has removed all of Tenant's C omm uni cation Facili ties, as required by the terms of this Lease. d. In addition to Rent, Tenant agrees to timely pay its pro rata share of any real estate tax es bas ed on the Tenant's Leas ed Prem ises or personal property tax es in lieu of real M IN H ilbert C hanh assen 4649706vl 4 estate taxes, required by any governm ental body having jurisdiction over the Property, as a result of this Lease, provided Tenant receives written notice of the applicable taxes. Tenant shall have the right, at its sole option and at its sole cost and expense, to appeal, challenge or seek modification of any tax assessment or billing for which Tenant is wholly or partly responsible for payment. Landlord shall reasonably cooperate with Tenant at Tenant's expense in filing, prosecuting, and perfecting any appeal or challenge to taxes as set forth in the preceding sentence, including, but not limited to, executing any consent, appeal or other similar docum ent. If as a result of any appeal or challenge by Tenant, there is a reduction, credit or repayment received by the Landlord for any tax es previously paid by Tenant, Landlord agrees to promptly reimburse to Tenant the amount of that reduction, credit or repayment. If Tenant does not have the standing rights to pursue a good faith and reasonable dispute of any taxes under this Section, Landlord will pursue that dispute at Tenant's sole cost and expense upon written request of Tenant. e. Tenant shall pay Landlord within sixty (60) days of receipt of an itemized invoice, the following if not already paid by Tenant: (i) all actual engineering fees incurred by Landlord related to Plan Review and Structural Review (if any); and (ii) all building and permit fees (if any); and (iii) all actua l attorneys' fees including, but not limited to Lease preparation and negotiation; and (iv) other actual costs and expenses associated with any required interference studies ("Landlord's Administrative Fees"). f. Tenant shall pay a late fee of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) if the Rent is not paid within fifteen (15) days of receipt of Landlord's written notice of the missed payment. MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 5 4. G O V E RN ME N T A L A PPR O V A L C O N T IN G E N C Y . a. Approvals. Tenant's right to use the Water Tower for Tenant's Tower Equipment, the Leased Premises, the Utility Easements and Access Easement as provided in this Lease is expressly made contingent upon (i) Tenant's obtaining at Tenant's sole cost and expense all the certificates, permits, zoning and other approvals that may be required by any federal, state, or local authority for Tenant's use of the Leased Premises and Tenant's Tower Equipment (individually, a "Governm ental Approval" and collectively, the "Governm ental Approvals"); (ii) Tenant complying with the terms and conditions of this Lease and the Plans and Specifications; and (iii) the engineering study specified in Subparagraph 4b below to be conducted at Tenant's expense. Landlord shall cooperate with Tenant in its efforts to obtain and retain all such Governm ental Approvals and shall take no action which would adversely affect the status of the Leased Premises with respect to the Tenant's proposed use thereof. b. Interference. Tenant represents and warrants that Tenant's Comm unication Facility, as hereinafter defined, will not interfere with the Landlord's Police, Fire, Emergency Medical, Public Works and Park's Comm uni cations Systems ("Landlord's Comm unication Systems"). If the Landlord experiences interference within Landlord's Communication Systems and reasonably believes the interference to be from Tenant's Comm unication Facility, Tenant shall take imm ediate steps to correct the interference problem at its cost and expense as provided in Paragraph 6(a) hereof. e. Non-approval. In the event that any Governm ental Approval necessary under Subpar agr aph 4a above is finally rejected or if any perm it, license or Governm ental Approval issued to Tenant is can celled, expires, lapses, or is oth erwise withdrawn or terminated by a governm ental auth ority so th at T enant, in its sole discretion, is un able to use th e Leased Prem ises M IN Hilbert C hanh assen 4649706vl 6 fo r its intended purp oses, Tenant shall have the right to term inate this Lease as provided in P ar agraph 10 hereof an d be reim bur sed fo r th e rent pai d if made pursuant to Subparagraph 3a above. N otice of T en ant's exercise of its ri ght to term in ate this L ease shal l be given to L an dlord pur suan t to Section 18 hereof. E x cept as requi red un der Subpar agraph 1 Od below , upon su ch term in ation , thi s L ease shal l becom e null an d void an d th e part ies sh all have no furth er obli gation s to each oth er. d. U ser P ri ori ty . T he L andlord an d T enan t agree that the fo ll owi n g pri orities of use, in descending order, shall apply in the ev ent of comm uni cation interfe ren ce, or other uses of th e W ater T ow er or L eased P rem ises, that confl ict wi th T enant's uses, or other users of th e W ater T ow er or th e P ropert y, w hil e th is L ease is in effect: 1. T he L an dlord's· w ater storage an d distri bution needs an d th e L an dlord's non - comm ercial comm uni cation needs incl u di n g, but not limi ted to, Lan dlord's C omm uni cation System s. ii. E x istin g leases on th e W ater T ow er an d/or th e P rop ert y un less th ere is a m aterial m odifi cation of an y existin g equi pm ent con fi gur ation an d/or fr equen cy ch ar acteri stics, in wh ich ev ent al l oth er existing leas es sh al l have pri ority. iii. T enan t's L ease. U nl ess there is a m aterial m odifi cation of T enant's C omm uni cation F acili ty an d/or fr equency ch ar acteri stics in T enan t's Antenn as, in w hi ch even t all oth er exi stin g leas es shal l have pri ori ty. Th is use shall be non - ex cl u sive, an d the L an dlord specifi cal ly reserv es the ri ght to al low the W ater T ow er an d the P rop ert y to be used by oth er part ies an d to m ak e additions, deletion s, or m odifi cation s to its own fa cili ties on th e W ater T ower an d th e M IN H il bert C hanh assen 4649706vl 7 Pro perty in th e futur e, provided th at they do not interfe re wi th the Tenan t's C o mm uni c atio n F acili ty . iv . N e w Leases. To the best of Lan dlord's abili ty , Lan dlord wi ll not kn owi ngly p e rm it o t h e r w ir e le s s c o mm uni c atio n s c arr ie r T e nants or licensees to, install new e q u ip m e nt o n o r m ak e any m odifications or alterations to equipm ent on the P ro p e rty o wn e d o r c o ntro ll e d b y L an d lo r d , if s u c h m o d ifi c atio n s or alterations c a u s e inte r fe r e n c e wi th T e n an t's o p e ra tio n s . 5. PERMITTED USES. a. Subject to the terms of this Lease, the Tenant's Tower Equipment, the Leased Premises, and the Access Easement and Utility Easements, may be used solely for the following uses: (i) the transmission and reception of wireless telephone and radio communication signals including but not limited to wireless and internet services; and (ii) for the purpose of constructing, installing, repairing, maintaining, removing and operating Tenant's Communication Facility in accordance with this Lease and in accordance with the transmission and reception of wireless communication signals authorized for use by Tenant by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") (the Tenant's Tower Equipment, Leased Premises, Tenant's Ground Equipment and/or all of Tenant's related equipment including, but not limited to, the improvements described in and/or shown on the Plans and Specifications are hereinafter referred to as "Tenant's Communication Facility"). The use of the Access Easement and Utility Easements are non-exclusive, and Landlord reserves the right to allow the Property to be used by others, provided they do not interfere with Tenant use of Tenant's Communication Facility. Tenant agrees to and shall comply with all applicable ordinances, statutes and regulations of local, state and federal agencies. M IN H ilbert C hanh assen 4649706v1 8 b. Tenan t, its agents an d contractors, ar e hereby gr anted th e right, at Tenant's sole cost an d expense, to enter upon th e Property an d conduct such studies as Tenant deem s necessary to determ in e the Property 's sui tabili ty fo r Tenant's intended use. These stu dies m ay include title reports, surv eys, soil tests, environm ental eval uations, radio wave propagation m easur em ents, field strength tests an d such other an alyses an d stu dies as Tenant deem s necessary or desirable. c. The placem ent of th e Tenan t's Comm uni cation Facili ty an d th e m ann er in whi ch the Tenant's Tower Equipm ent ar e insta lled on th e W ater Tower shall be subject to prior review an d approval by a registered profe ssional stru ctur al engineer ("Stru ctur al Engineer") an d the Lan dlord an d its agents, whi ch approval shall not be unr eas onably withh eld, conditioned or delayed by Lan dlord. Tenant shall provide Lan dlord wi th evidence of review an d approval by the Stru ctur al Engineer. Lan dlord shall, at all tim es, use reas onable efforts to provide Tenant ingress, egr ess, an d access to the W ater Tower, an d Leas ed Prem ises, over the Access Easem ent, .s u bje c t to th e te rm s o f thi s L e a se p ro v id e d , h o w e v e r , L an d lo rd shall not be required to rem ove sn o w fr o m th e A c c e ss E a s e m e n t. T e n an t wi ll n o t a ll o w an y m e c h an ic s' o r m ate ri a lm e n 's li e n s to b e p la c e d a g a in st th e P ro p e rty a s a re s u lt o f its w o rk o n th e P r o p e rt y . T h e T e n an t sh a ll h av e th e ri g ht, d ur in g c o n stru c tio n an d in s tal latio n o f th e T e n an t's T o w e r E q u ip m e n t o n th e W ate r T o w e r an d G ro u n d E q u ip m e nt to d ri v e al l e q u ip m e n t n e c e ss ary fo r c o n stru c tio n an d in sta ll atio n a c ro s s th e A c c e s s E as e m e n t. T e n an t sh a ll al so h av e th e righ t d ur in g thi s L e a se to dr iv e to th e W ate r T o w e r an d th e L e a s e d P r e m ise s o v e r th e A c c e s s E a se m e n t fo r th e re p a ir, m a inte n an c e an d o p e r atio n o f th e T e n an t's C o mm uni c a tio n F a c ili ty . If th e T e n an t d am a g e s th e P r o p e rty d uri n g th e c o n stru c tio n , re p ai r o r m ai n te n an c e o f an y o f th e T e n an t's C o mm uni c atio n F a c ili ty at an y tim e d uri n g th e te rm o f thi s L e a se , it sh al l imm e d iate ly (w ithi n 3 0 d ay s ), re p a ir th e P ro p e rt y to th e c o n d itio n s it w as in p ri o r to th e T en an t d am a g in g th e M IN H ilbert C hanh assen 4649706vl 9 same including but not limited to the filling of all ruts caused by equipment driving on the Property an d reseeding an d/or planting all grass and other vegetation thereon including trees and shru bs, such that the Property is in the same condition as it was prior to the damage caused by Tenant and/or its contractors. Tenant may not add, change or alter Tenant's Communication Facility from that set forth an d/or shown on the Plans and Specifications without the prior. written approval of the Landlord, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, however, such approval shall not be required for Tenant to change similar type equipment, except for the Tenant's Tower Equipment on the Water Tower, provided that any such change does not materially change the appearance of the Tenant's Communication Facility. Tenant agrees to enter into an "Escrow Agreement" in a form and substance acceptable to Landlord wherein Tenant shall deposit with Landlord the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) to be used to reimburse Landlord for all costs incurred by the Landlord in connection with any alteration or modification of, or addition to, the Tenant's Communication Facility pursuant to this Lease, including but not limited to plan review, structural review, site meetings, inspection time, and as-built updating because of Tenant's changes, including attorney's fees for drafting and and/or reviewing documents. d. Tenant agrees that if Tenant's Communication Facility produces noise levels that cause a disturbance to the surrounding neighbors of the Property, Tenant will at its own expense install noise mitigating equipment or a buffer to meet State noise standards. e. Tenant shall telephonically notify the Landlord of scheduled work to Tenant's Communication Facility that is to be done after 5:00 o'clock p.m. on business days, and any time on weekends and holidays. The notice shall be given to Landlord's Assistant City Manager so M IN H ilbert C hanh assen 4649706vl 10 that it is received at least 48 hours in advance of the start of the scheduled work. In the case of Tenan t's emergency work to the Tenant's Communication Facility, Tenant shall telephonically notify the Lan dlord as soon as practicable after comm encement of the work. In the cas e of emergency work to the Tenant's Comm uni cation Facility after City Hall norm al business hours or any time on weekends an d holidays, Tenan t shall call Lan dlord's Utility Departm ent at 952- 917-9345 to arr an ge for access on the W ater Tower. f. Landlord agrees to give Tenant at least ninety (90) days' ad vance wri tten notice of any major repair or maintenance activities related to Landlord's Water Tower operations. In the case of an emergency, notification is not required; however, Tenan t will be notified as soon as practically possible. In the event that us e of the W ater Tower for water service or an y necessary maintenan ce or repair of the W ater Tower is interru pted or made impractical because of Tenan t's Antenn as, or Tenan t's Coax ial Cables and other equipment on the Water Tower, the Lan dlord may interrupt Tenant's use of the Leased Premises an d/or Water Tower as is reasonably necessary to prevent interru ption of Lan dlord's water service. Th e Lan dlord will use its best efforts to prevent or minimize interru ptions to Tenant's use of the Water Tower or the Leased Premises for the painting an d/or reconditionin g of the W ater Tower. Tenant shall provide Lan dlord's painting contractor wi th pertinent safety instru ctions relative to working near the Tenant's Antennas, Tenant's Coax ial Cables an d other equipment on the Water Tower, an d, if necessary , Tenant may be required to lower the power level or turn off transmission while Lan dlord's painting contractor is working near Tenant's Antennas, Tenan t's Coax ial Cables and other equipment on the W ater Tower. If Tenant's Antennas, Tenant's Coax ial Cables and other equipment on the W ater Tower are in the way of painting or reconditioning work on the W ater Tower, Tenant may be required to temporari ly move Tenant's Antennas, Tenant's Coaxial Cables M IN H ilbert Chanh assen 4649706vl 11 an d other equipment on the W ater Tower at Tenant's sole cost an d expense ("Temporary Relocation"). Tenan t shall have the righ t to place temporary tran smission an d reception facilities on the Property until such time as Tenant is able to reinstall Tenant's Facility on the W ater Tower. An y additional expense of repainting, repairing or maintaining the W ater Tower rea so n ab ly incurr ed by the Lan dlord as a direct consequence of the presence of Tenan t's An tenn a s, T en an t's C o a x ia l C a b le s o r o th er e q u ip m ent lo c ate d th e reo n sh al l b e p a id b y th e T en an t to th e L an d lo rd wi th in thi rty (3 0 ) d ay s fo ll o wi n g th e re c e ip t o f th e L an d lo rd 's wr itt e n n o tice o f su c h a d d itio n a l co st wh ic h n o tic e sh al l state th e re a so n s fo r L an dl o rd in curr in g th e c o sts an d sh a ll in cl u d e a rea so n a b le itemi z atio n o f su c h co sts. 6. TENANT'S COMMUNICATION FACILITY. a. Tenant agrees to install the Tenant's Tower Equipment, in compliance with all FCC rules and regulations, and good engineering practices and according to the Plans and Specifications. Tenant further agrees that the Tenant's use of the Tenant's Communication Facility will not cause radio frequency interference to Landlord's Communication Systems, provided such systems are lawfully installed and properly operated. In the event of interference with Landlord's Communication Systems and Tenant is advised of such interference, Tenant shall eliminate such interference within twenty-four (24) hours or cease using the applicable equipment of Tenant causing the interference except for short tests necessary for the elimination of the interference. If Tenant, in the event of interference with Landlord's Communication Systems, fails to correct the interference within twenty-four (24) hours or ceases using the equipment within said time, except for testing purposes, Landlord shall have the right to order Tenant to disconnect the power to the Tenant's Communication Facility. If Tenant does not immediately disconnect the power to Tenant's Communication Facility, Landlord shall have the M IN H ilbert C hanh assen 4649706vl 12 right to immediately seek injunctive relief from the applicable court having jurisdiction to disconnect the power to Tenant's Communication Facility. It is further agreed that Landlord does not guarantee to Tenant non-interference to the operation of Tenant's Communication Facility by Landlord's Communication Systems. Landlord will use its best efforts to notify other users of the Property of the interference, and to coordinate elimination of interference among the Tenant and other users of the Property. The parties agree that such reasonable evidence of interference that is likely caused by Tenant's use or operation of Tenant's Communication Facility warrants an emergency response and the Notices provision in Section 18 shall not apply. Rather, Landlord shall provide Tenant reasonable evidence that the interference is likely caused by the Tenant's use or operation of Tenant's Communication Facility verbally by telephone at Tenant's NOC at 800-264-6620. Upon Landlord providing Tenant notice of reasonable evidence that any interference is likely caused by Tenant's use or operation of Tenant's Communication Facility, Tenant shall send a qualified technician or representative to the Leased Premises within eight (8) hours from the time that the notice of reasonable evidence is provided by Landlord. The required eight (8) hour emergency response time under these circumstances is applicable 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The qualified technician or representative shall be capable of assessing the situation and eliciting the necessary response, including any repairs, alterations or modifications to Tenant's Communication Facility. b. Prior to adding additional antennas, transmitters, receivers or other equipment on the Water Tower or within the Leased Premises, or changing or modifying Tenant's Frequencies, as permitted under this Lease, Tenant agrees to notify the Landlord of the modified frequencies so that the Landlord can perform the necessary interference studies to insure that the modified MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 13 frequencies wi ll not cause harm fu l radio interference to Lan dlord's Comm uni cation Systems or other tenants on the Property. Tenan t will be required to pay the reasonable costs for said study which will be performed by Landlord's professional communications engineer. In the alternative, Tenant may perform the interference studies and submit the results to the Landlord. However, the Landlord, in its sole discretion, shall retain the right provided herein to submit the study results to its professional communications engineer for review at Tenant's expense. c. At Tenant's sole cost and expense, Tenant shall maintain Tenant's Tower Equipment and the Shelter in as close as reasonably possible to the condition the Tenant's Tower Equipment and the Shelter are in as of the date that they are installed on the Water Tower and the Premises, reasonable wear and tear accepted. Tenant shall further maintain the Leased Premises in a neat and orderly fashion including cutting the grass and replacing all trees and shrubs on the Leased Premises that may die during the term of this Lease. If the Landlord inspects the Tenant's Communication Facility and determines that Tenant has not maintained the Tenant's Tower Equipment attached to the Water Tower, and there is rust or corrosion, broken or improperly installed Tower Equipment of Tenant on the Water Tower (hereinafter referred to as "Defective Condition"), the Landlord shall give the Tenant notice of the Defective Condition, and Tenant shall take such action as is reasonably necessary to correct the Defective Condition. Landlord's notice to Tenant shall inform Tenant: (1) of the action required by Tenant to correct the Defective Condition, and (2) whether the Tenant is required to take immediate action (within 48 hours) of Landlord's notice, or whether Tenant is required to take action within ninety (90) days of Landlord's notice, to correct the Defective Condition, as determined by Landlord in its sole discretion. • MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 14 4649706vl 7. UTILITY SERVICE AND ACCESS EQUIPMENT. All of Tenant's, electrical wires, telephone cables and related equipment, and gas lines (if any) ("Tenant's Utilities") and Coaxial Cable installed on the Property and/or the Leased Premises shall be installed underground except as shown on the Plans and Specifications and within the Utility Easements, as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on the Site Plan according to the Landlord's applicable code, rules and regulations and all state codes, rules and regulations. When installed, the Tenant's Utilities, including the Coaxial Cable shall be directionally bored and adjusted in the field to avoid potential impact to any existing trees and "hand dug" in any area or location where there are numerous existing utilities. Tenant shall provide Landlord with an as-built plan showing the exact location of all of Tenant's Utilities and Coaxial Cable installed on the Property, Leased Premises and/or the Water Tower. Tenant shall furnish Landlord with pertinent information as to the exact type of AC power used by the Tenant. The Tenant agrees that upon the request of the Landlord, it will field locate all of Tenant's Utilities and Coaxial Cable at Tenant's expense. It shall be the responsibility of Tenant, its agents, contractors and/or subcontractors at Tenant's sole cost and expense to contact Gopher One Call and/or all other parties including, but not limited to, Landlord and all of Landlord's other tenants occupying the Property, for locate requests prior to any construction or installation of the Tenant's Tower Equipment, Tenant's. Coaxial Cable, Tenant's Utilities and other equipment described in this Lease, on the Property. If any of the Landlord's other tenants decline to locate their utilities, it shall be the responsibility of Tenant to locate said other tenants' utilities at Tenant's sole cost and expense. Landlord agrees that it will assist with contact information for the other tenants upon the written request of the Tenant. Tenant agrees that Tenant will, upon the reasonable request of the Landlord or another tenant of the Landlord, locate all of Tenant's Coaxial Cables and Tenant's Utilities. MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 15 As partial consideration for Rent paid under this Lease, Landlord hereby grants to the Tenant an appurtenant non-exclusive easement for Tenant's Utilities, over and under the Utility Easements and an appurtenant non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress, and access to Tenant's Leased Premises over the Property as legally described in Exhibit "A" and shown on the Site Plan ("Access Easements") adequate to service the Tenant's Communication Facility at all times during the term of this Lease or any Renewal Term. Upon notice, Landlord shall have the right, at Landlord's sole expense, to relocate the Access Easements, provided such new location shall not materially interfere with the operations of Tenant's Communication Facility. The Access Easements provided hereunder shall have the same terin as this Lease. 8. ADDITIONAL TENANT'S. Tenant acknowledges that Landlord may in the future lease portions of the Water Tower and Property to other parties, so long as Landlord shall not itself, nor permit any new tenants or licensees to install equipment on the Property or within the Leased Premises, if such equipment would cause interference with Tenant's operations of Tenant's Communication Facility. 9. DEFAULT. Any of the following occurrences, conditions, or acts shall be deemed a "Default" under this lease: a. If Tenant fails to pay amounts due under this Lease within thirty (30) days of its receipt of written notice that such payments are overdue; b. If either party fails to observe or performs its obligations under this Lease and does not cure such failure within sixty (60) days from its receipt of written notice of breach without, however, limiting any other rights available to the parties pursuant to any other provision of this Lease. If the default may not be reasonably cured within such sixty (60) day MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 16 period, either party may request a thirty (30) day extension of the time to cure said default, which request shall not be unr easonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. c. Except as expressly lim ited hereby, Lan dlord an d Tenant shall have such remedies fo r the default of the other part y hereto as may be provided at law or equity following wri tten notice of such default an d failure to cure the sam e wi thi n the applicable time allowed to cure under the term s of this Lease. 10. TERMINATION. a. Except as otherwi se provided herein, thi s Lease may be term inated, wi thout penalty or further liabili ty, as fo llows: 1. by either part y upon thirty (30) days wri tten notice of a Default as defined herein (without, however, limiting an y other rights available to the part ies pursuant to any other provisions hereof); 11. by Tenant upon ninety (90) days wr itten notice by Tenant if Tenant is unable aft er filing all necessary applications for obtaining or maintaining of an y license, perm it or other Governm ental Approval an d maki ng all reasonable efforts an d using due diligence to comply wi th all requirements necessar y to obtain or maintain any license, perm it or other Governm ental Approval necessary for the installation an d/or operation of the Tenant's Comm uni cation Facility or Tenan t's business; iii. by Tenant upon ninety (90) days' notice if the Tenan t's Comm un ication Facility becomes obsolete or unacceptable under Tenant's design or engineering standards for Tenan t's Comm uni cation Facility; MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 17 iv. by Landlord if Tenant fails to cure within ninety (90) days of written notice by Landlord to Tenant that Landlord has determined that Tenant has failed to comply with any applicable ordinance, or state or federal law, or any conditions attached to Government Approvals granted thereunder, after a public hearing before the Landlord's Council; v. by Tenant if there is an interference problem with the Landlord's Communication Systems caused by Tenant's Communication Facility that cannot be corrected; or vi. by Landlord upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice after the end of the First Renewal Term, if Landlord's Council decides to sell or redevelop the Property and/or discontinue use of the Property for public or governmental purposes in a manner that is inconsistent, in Landlord's sole opinion, with Tenant's continued use of Tenant's Communication Facility. b. Notice of Termination. The parties shall give notice of termination of this Lease in accordance with Section 18 of this Lease. All rentals paid for by Tenant prior to said termination date shall be retained by Landlord. C. Tenant's Liability for Early Termination. If Tenant terminates this Lease pursuant to subsection 10.a.iii above, Tenant shall pay to Landlord as liquidated damages for early termination, six months of additional Rent for the year in which Tenant terminates; provided, however, that Tenant shall not be required to pay liquidated damages or termin ation fee if Tenant elects not to renew the term of this Lease pursuant to Section 2, above. d. Removal of Communication Facility. The Tenant shall remove all of Tenant's Tower Equipment, Coaxial Cable, Tenant's Utilities, the Shelter and all of Tenant's Ground Equipment in the Leased Premises on or before the end of the Initial Term or the end of any MIN Hilbert Chanh assen 4649706vl 18 / Renewal Term if Tenant is not going to renew this Lease. Upon termination of this Lease for any other reason, Tenant shall, within ninety (90) days of "Landlord's Notice" as hereinafter provided, remove all of Tenant's Tower Equipment, Coaxial Cable, Utilities, all of Tenant's equipment in the Leased Premises and any fencing around the Leased Premises and all Coaxial Cable, and Utilities and restore the Water Tower and the Property to a condition as close as possible to its original condition. Any of Tenant's Communication Facility or any other improvement made by Tenant on the Property, remaining on the Property ninety (90) days after Landlord's Notice may be removed by Landlord at Tenant's sole cost and expense, or at Landlord's sole discretion, become the property of the Landlord free of any claim by Tenant or any person claiming through Tenant. If Tenant fails to remove all of the Tenant's Communication Facility or any other improvements within the above-described time periods, the Tenant shall pay to Landlord, notwithstanding the termination of this Lease, Rent in an amount equal to 150% of the amount of Rent that would have been due for the period of time that any of the Tenant's Communication Facility remains on the Property. 11. INSURANCE. Tenant agrees to obtain and maintain during the term of this Lease the insurance coverage's set forth in Exhibit "D". 12. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION. a. General. Tenant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Landlord and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and representatives, from and against any and all claims, costs, losses, expenses, demands, actions, or causes of action, including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses of litigation, which may be asserted against or incurred by Landlord or for which the Landlord may be liable in the performance of this Lease, MIN Hilbert Chanh assen 4649706vl 19 except to the extent that any cost, losses, expenses, demands, actions or causes of action arise from the negligence, or willful misconduct of Landlord, or its respective employees, agents or contractors. Tenant shall further defend and indemn ify all claims arising out of the installation, operation, use, maintenance, repair, removal, or presence of the Tenant's Comm unication Facility on the Property, except to the extent that a claim arises from the negligence or willful misconduct of Landlord or its respective employees, agents or contractors. N otw ithstanding any other term, covenant or condition of this Lease, the Landlord's liability under this Lease for any claim of any nature or any cause of action against Landlord, by any person or party, is limited to the liability limits set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. b. Tenant's Warranty. Tenant represents and warrants that its use of the Tenant's T ow er E quipment and the Leased Premises, will not generate, and Tenant will not store or dispose of on the Leased Prem ises, nor tran sport to the L eas ed Prem ises, or over th e Property, an y H az ar dous M aterial s, as hereinaft er defi ned, except fo r equipm ent an d supplies comm onl y used by Tenan t in the operation of Tenant's C omm un ication Facili ty which may include generator fu el, electroni cs, cables, basic clean ing materials and back up batteries, unl ess Tenant specifi cally inform s Landlord thereof in writing twenty-four hours prior to such storage, disposal or tr an sport , or otherwi se as soon as T enant becom es'aw ar e of the existence of Hazar dous M aterials on the Leased Premises or Property. Landlord acknowledges that Tenant may be utili zing an d m aintainin g sealed batteries, a H V AC system an d/or a halon / FM 200 fire suppression system on the Leased Premises and that the use and maintenance of such items shall not constitute a breach of the terms of this Lease. The obligations of the Tenant under this Paragraph 12 shall surv ive the expiration or other termination of this Lease. Tenant shall not MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 20 install a generator on the Leased Premises or on the Property unl ess specifically shown in the Plan s and Specifications approved by the Landlord. c. Hazardous Materials. Without limiting the scope of Subparagraph 12a and 12b above, Tenant will be responsible for and will defend, indemn ify, and hold Lan dlord, its agents, and employees harm less from and against any and all claims, costs, and liabilities, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, arising out of or in connection with the cleanup or restoration of the Leased Premises or the Property associated with the Tenant's use of Hazar dous Materials, except to the extent that any claims, cost and/or liability including reasonable attorneys' fees arising out of or in connection wi th the cleanup or restoration of the Leased Premises or the Property arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the Landlord or its employees, agents or contractors. For the purp oses of this Le ase, "Hazar dous Materials" shall be interpreted broadly and specifically includes, without limitation, asbestos, fuel, batteries or any % hazardous substance, waste, or materials as defined in any federal, state, or local environm ental or safety law or regulations including, but not limited to, CERCLA. Notwithstanding anythi ng to the contrary herein, Tenan t shall have the right to store and use standard quantities of batteries withi n its Comm unications Facility so long as it does so in ful l complian ce with all applicable laws. Tenant shall not be responsible for any Hazar dous Materials that existed on the Property on or before the effective date of thi s Lease or that were not brought on the Property by Tenant. 13. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Notwi thstanding anyth ing to the contrary in thi s Lease, in no event will either part y be liable to the other part y for, or indemnify the other part y against, puni tive, indirect, incidental, special or consequential dam ages, including, wi thout limitation, loss of profits, income or business opportuni ties; provided, however, that this MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 21 provision shall not release or reduce Tenant's obligation to pay Rent to the Landlord in accordance with the terms of this Lease. 14. ASSIGNMENT. This Lease, or rights thereunder, may not be sold, assigned, or transferred at any time by Tenant except to Tenant's affiliates or subsidiaries, or any party that merges or consolidates with Tenant or Tenant's parent, or an y part y that purchases or otherwise acquires all or substantially all of Tenant's stock or assets in the market defined by the FCC in which the Property is located wi thout the wr itten consent of the Landlord, such consent not to be unr easonably wi thh eld, conditioned or delayed. For purposes of this paragraph, an "affiliate" or "subsidiary" means an entity in which Tenant owns greater than a 50% interest. Landlord hereby consents to the assignment by Tenant of its rights under this Lease as collateral to any entity which provides financing for the purchase of the Tenant's Tower Equipment, Equipment Cabinets, subject to Landlord's rights to retain the same and/or other improvements if Tenant fails to remove them as required by this Lease. 15. QUIET ENJOYMENT. Tenant, upon paying Rent, shall peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the use of the Water Tower for Tenant's Tower Equipment, the Leased Premises, the Access Easements an d Utility Easements provided Tenant is not in defa ult un der any other covenant or agreement contained in this Lease. Lan dlord hereby waives any and all lien rights it may have statutory or otherwise concerning the Tenant's Communication Facility or any portion thereof which shall be deemed personal property for the purp oses of this Lease, whether or not the sam e is deemed real or personal property under the applicable laws, and Landlord gives Tenant and Tenant's mortgagees ("Mortgagees"), the right to remove all or any portion of Tenant's Comm unication Facility from time to time, whether before or after default under the Lease, in Tenant's and/or mortgagee's sole discretion and without Lan dlord's consent, subject to MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 22 the obligations of the Tenant to remove Tenant's Communication Facility as set forth in Section l0(d). If a Mortgagee desires to remove Tenant's Communication Facility, the Mortgagee shall sign an agreement with the Landlord stating that they will be responsible for restoring the Water Tower and the Property to a condition as close as possible to its original condition, as required in this Lease, and that they will be liable to the Landlord for any cost and expenses incurred by Landlord in restoring the Property to a condition as close as possible to its original condition in the event that the Mortgagee fails to do so. 16. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION. If the Tenant's Communication Facility or any portion thereof is destroyed or damaged so as to materially hinder the effective use of the Tenant's Communication Facility by Tenant through no fault or negligence of Tenant, Tenant may elect to terminate this Lease upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Landlord. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease (except as to the Tenant's obligations under this Lease to remove the Tenant's Communication Facility under Paragraph 10.d.) as of the date of the notice to Landlord and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any Rent prepaid by Tenant. If Tenant elects to continue this Lease, then the Rent shall abate for a period of ninety (90) days or until the Tenant's Communication Facility is restored to the condition existing prior to the damage or destruction, whichever is earlier. 17. CONDEMNATION. In the event the whole of the Leased Premises or the Property is taken by eminent domain, this Lease shall terminate as of the date title to the Leased Premises or the Property vests in the condemning authority. In event a portion of the Leased Premises is taken by eminent domain, Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease as of the date of title transfer, by giving thirty (30) days' written notice to Landlord. In the event of any taking under the power of eminent domain, Tenant shall not be entitled to any portion of the reward MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 23 paid for the taki ng and the Landlord shall receive full am ount of such award. Tenant hereby expressly waives any right or claim to any portion thereof. Although all damages, whether aw ar ded as compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold or to the fee of the Leased Prem ises or the Property shall belong to L andlord, Tenant shall have the right to claim and recover fr om the condemn ing authority, but not from Lan dlord, such com pens ation as m ay be separ ately aw ar ded or recoverable by T enan t in cluding any an d all dam age to Tenan t's business an d an y costs or expenses in curr ed by Tenant in m oving/rem oving all or a portion of th e Tenant's C om m uni cation Facili ty. 18. NOTICES. A ll notices, requests, dem an ds, an d oth er comm uni cations hereun der shall be in w riting an d shall be deem ed given if personal ly delivered or m ailed, cert ifi ed m ai l, return receipt requested, or delivered by a nationally recogni zed overni ght courier serv ice, to the fo llow ing addresses or to any oth er address of T enant or L an dlord th at is given from tim e to tim e to th e oth er part y pur suan t to this provision, regar ding wr itten notice: If to Lan dl ord: w ith copy to: If to T enan t: C ity of Chanh assen P.O . B ox 147 C hanh assen MN 55317 Attn : C ity M an ager C hanh assen C ity Attorn ey C ampbell Kn utson, P.A. 860 Bl ue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan , MN 55121 Verizon W ireless (V A W) L LC d/b /a V erizon W ireless 180 W ashin gt on Valley Road B edm in ster, N J 07921 Attn: N etw ork Real E state Phone: 866-862-4404 19. RESTORATION OF PROPERTY. T enan t shall deposit with the Lan dlord at th e tim e of th e bui ldin g perm it application a perfo rm an ce bond in th e am oun t of $25,000 as securi ty fo r MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 24 the restoration of the Property to the condition it was prior to the installation of Tenant's Communication Facility ("Restoration Security") reasonable wear and tear excepted. 20. MISCELLANEOUS: a. Authority. Landlord represents and warrants that Landlord has full authority to enter into and sign this Lease. b. Complete Lease: Amendments. This Lease supersedes all prior discussions and negotiations and contains all agreements and understandings between the Landlord and Tenant. This Lease may only be amended in writing signed by all parties. All Exhibits are incorporated into this Lease by reference. 'c. Counter_parts. This Lease may be signed in counterparts by the parties hereto each of which counterparts shall be considered an original. d. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this Lease shall run with the Property, inure to the benefit of and be binding on the respective parties and their respective successors and permitted assignees. e. Enforcement and Attorneys' Fees. The prevailing party in any action or proceeding in court to enforce the terms of this Lease including any appeals shall be entitled to receive its reasonable attorney's fees and other reasonable costs and expenses from the non- prevailing party. f. Governing Law. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. g. Severability. If any term of this Lease is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Lease, which shall continue in full force and effect. M IN Hilbert C hanh as sen 4649706vl 25 h. Memorandum of Lease. Landlord agrees, upon the request of the Tenant, to sign a Memorandum of Lease in the form acceptable to both parties which may be recorded in the Office of the Carver County Recorder. 1. Estoppel Information. Each party shall from time to time, within thirty (30) days after written request from the other party, execute, acknowledge and deliver an estoppel certificate indicating that this Lease and any amendments thereto are in full force and effect, setting out the current monthly rental amount, date rent is paid through, expiration date of the then current term, and acknowledging that there are not, to such party's knowledge, any uncured defaults, or specifying such defaults if any are claimed. j. Brokers. If either party is represented by a real estate broker in this transaction, that party shall be fully responsible for any fee due such broker in this transaction, that party shall be fully responsible for any fee due such broker, and shall hold the other party harmless from any claims for commission by such broker. k. No Waiver. No provision of this Lease will be deemed waived by either party unless expressly waived in writing by the waiving party . No waiver shall be implied by delay or any other act or omission of either party . No waiver by either party of any provisions of this Lease shall be deemed a waiver of such provision with respect to any subsequent matter relating to such provision. l. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated in this Lease as though they were set forth in the body hereof. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.] {Sign ature page follows.] M IN H ilbert C hanh assen 4649706vl 26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Lease Agreement the day and year first above written. LANDLORD: CITY OF CHANHASSEN Date: <^Ia 11 ^ ^ °1 TENANT: VERIZON WIRELESS {\j VERIZON WIRELESJ BY: Name: Title: LLC d/b/a Rommel Angeles Date:0 ? THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651)452-5000 MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl 27 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit "A": Legal Descriptions of: ( 1) Property (2) Access Easements (3) Utility Easement Exhibit "B": Site Plan showing: ( 1) Property (2) Leased Premises (3) Access Easements (4) Utility Easement Exhibit "C": Plans and Specifications Exhibit "D": Tenant's Required Insurance M IN H ilbert C hanh assen 28 4649706vl T en an t Site I.D . #: M IN H il b ert L an d l o r d 's S i t e N am e : H ig h Z on e W ater T o w er T en ant: V eri zon W ireless (V A W) L L C d/b /a V eri zo n W ir eless E XH IBIT "A " L EG AL DESC RI PTIO N S (1) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: The following described property located in Carver County, Minnesota: SCHOOL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: (per Doc. No. 543946) The Southwest Quarter (SWl/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NWl/4) of Section Three (3), -Township One Hundred Sixteen (116), Range Twenty-three (23) West, according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, excepting therefrom the 35/l00ths acres conveyed by deed recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Carver County, Minnesota in Book 8 of Deeds, page 400, and that part thereof conveyed by deed recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Carver County, Minnesota, in Book 41 of Deeds, page 322, and subject to the right, title and interest of the State of Minnesota in that strip ofland conveyed by deed recorded in the office of the Register of Deeds of Carver County, Minnesota, in Book 33 of Deeds, page 2s. Also that part of Lot E, Bardwell Acres, not conveyed by said deed recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Carver County, Minnesota, in Book 41 of Deeds, page 322. WATER TOWER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: (per Doc. No. 543946) A perpetual easement for municipal utility purposes over, under, and across that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 87 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the south line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter 125.41 feet; thence North 02 degrees 50 minutes 43 seconds East 125.81 feet; thence North 86 degrees 53 minutes 26 seconds West 53.02 feet; thence North 18 degrees 34 minutes 16 seconds West 88.43 feet; thence North 69 degrees 09 minutes 09 seconds West 22.10 feet to the easterly right-of-way line of State Highway No. 41; thence South 20 degrees 52 minutes 22 seconds West, along said right-of-way line 58.70 feet to a point on the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 03 degrees 10 minutes 34 seconds West along said west line 159.50 feet to the point of beginning. M IN H il bert C hanh assen 4649706vl (2) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ACCESS EASEMENTS: A 15.00 fo ot w ide right of w ay fo r ingress an d egress purp oses over and across the Southwest Quart er of the N orth w est Quarter of Section 3, T own ship 116 N orth , Ran ge 23 W est of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Carv er C ounty, M inn esota, the centerline of said right of way is described as follows: Comm encing at the southwest comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 87 degr ees 12 minutes 20 seconds East along the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of77.10 feet; thence North 2 degrees 47 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 60.60 feet to the Point of Beginning of the centerline to be described; thence South 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 9.67 feet; thence southeasterly, easterly and northeasterly, a distance of 144.70 feet along a tangential curv e concave to the North, having a radius of 110.00 feet and a central angle of 75 degrees 22 minutes 05 seconds; thence North 59 degrees 37 minutes 55 seconds East tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 18.98 feet; thence South 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of252.81 feet; thence North O degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 118.01 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of 187.3 8 feet; thence North 60 degrees 46 minutes 24 seconds East, a distance of30.93 feet; thence North 1 degree 38 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 136.26 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence North 20 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, a distance of29.84 feet; thence South 87 degre es 30 minutes 00 seconds Eas t, a distan ce of 192.59 fe et; th ence N orth 55 degrees 24 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of91.25 fe et; th ence N orth 2 degr ees 43 min utes 59 seconds East, a distance of 161.58 feet; thence N orth 32 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 31.57 feet; thence North 87 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 336.20 feet; thence North 60 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds W est; a distance of 54.25 feet; thence North 30 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of 114.23 fe et; th ence north w esterly, a distan ce of 129.81 fe et along a tangential curv e concave to the southw est, having a radius of 175.00 fe et an d a central an gle of 42 degr ees 30 min utes 00 seconds; thence N orth 72 degrees 30 m in utes 00 seconds W est, a distan ce of23 l.23 fe et to th e eas terly right of w ay line of State Trunk High w ay N um ber 41 an d sai d centerline th ere term inating. T he sidelines of said ri ght of w ay shall be short ened or length ened to term inate at said easterly right of way line of State T runk Highway N um ber 41. T O G ET H E R W IT H A 15.00 fo ot wi de righ t of way fo r ingress an d egr ess purp oses over an d acro ss said Southw est Quart er of the N orthw est Quart er, the centerl ine of sai d right of w ay is descri bed as fo llow s: B eginni ng at th e previously described Point "A "; thence N orth 53 degrees 07 mi nutes 52 seconds W est, a distan ce of 54.03 fe et; thence N orth 86 degr ees 24 m inutes 24 seconds W est, a distan ce of 64.58 fe et; th ence N orth 51 degr ees 09 m inutes 12 seconds W est, a distance of21.48 fe et; th ence N orth O degrees 26 mi nutes 17 seconds W est, a distan ce of 177.36 fe et an d said centerl ine th ere term inating. MIN H il bert C hanh assen 4649706vl (3) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS: A 10.00 foot wide right of way for utility purposes over, under and across the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 116 North, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Carver County, Minnesota, the centerline of said right of way is described as follows: Comm encing at the southwest comer of said Southwest Quart er of the Northwest Quarter; thence South 87 degrees 12 minutes 20 seconds East along the South line of said Southwest Quart er of the Northwest Quarter, a distance of 77.10 feet; thence North 2 degrees 47 minutes 40 seconds East, a distance of 93.74 feet to the Point of Beginning of the centerline to be described; thence South 60 degrees 15 minutes 54 seconds East, a distance of 11. 85 feet; thence South 27 degrees 54 min utes 18 seconds East, a distance of 11.18 feet; thence South O degrees 31 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 18.89 feet; thence South 15 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, a distance of38.43 feet; thence South 82 degrees 58 minutes 34 seconds West, a distance of33.25 feet; thence North 59 degrees 54 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 43.23 feet; thence North O degrees 02 minutes 11 seconds East, a distance of 145.00 feet to the easterly right of way line of State Trunk Highway Number 41 and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said right of way shall be shortened or lengthened to terminate at said easterly right of way line of State Trunk Highway Num ber 41. MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl EXH IBIT "B" SITE PLAN EXISTING BITUMINOUS DRE / EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ) "®® EXISTING TREE LINE (TYPICAL) EXISTING WATER TOWER EASEMENT ISTNG 10'-0° (wIDOE) UTILITY EASEMENT ING RETANNING WALL NG MATER TOWER - - ---- CD MIN H IL B E RT M IN Hilbert C hanh assen 4649706vl EXH IBIT "C" PLAN S AN D SP EC IFICATIONS See A ttached Draw ings MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl YY YYYYY YYYYY: ,. DEPARTMENTAL ver fzon' I APPROVALS POoE; t% RF ENGINEER N(THY AKAL'YANI APURUY/AR o9.21 .AT? OPERATIONS J0NATHAN POM.EIR ea.t7.f7 ANASR CONSTRUCT KN ALEX HOLING=R oa.a.f7 MIN HILBERT NEW BUILD a ENGINEER PROJECT INFORMATION LOCATION SCAN Sr7E NAME: MIN HILBERT SITE ADORE2EASIER MA2EL.TIME BOUIE'ARID CHANHASSEN MN &8347 COUNTY: CARER ATTTuOE: w4 &3 07.8 $ADES) LOMarTuE: was 0 54.46° {AD8S} DRAWING BARED OM SITE DATA FORM (M'TEE& O.23,47 8u.DANG TYPE: -EB OCCUPANCY: • Se AREA: TO 8.F ISSUE SUMMARY 1eV. DECRNP TON &HEE'T OR DETAIL A i®JED FOR EMEW- O-4$.47 AUL, • e2 OR OWNiRR APPOVAL. » 10,02.f? AL.L C GD FOR ONER APPROVAL, -02.23. 98 ALL D SB. DO FOR OWNER APPROVAL =O7.t.8 AL.L y awwutrn,, I '' ,s 0, aµe,;,, r ····- 1 __ I~ tf-t.-.'.] 5\ 36s1 y55 . @® <rt 'sAgnig for electrical sheets E-l thru E-4 ... IL-ES_S_O_R_/_L_IC_E_N_S_O_R_AP_P_R_O_iV_ALl....,'-.,, TOWER ELEVATION rue I Peres 1 A,g3 SHEET INDEX SHEET ] SHEET bDEARCR+TON -4 l] ROECT IMF0RMATON, TOWER ELEVATION, 4 SHEET INDEX A-1 I llllE PUN I ITANDMDIETM.NEC AZ ENLARGED BITE PLAN A2.1 [] PLOR PLAN AND EQUI PMENT LAYOUT M I NRBN\IMD COM.ICEY NID Nl11HrilA IIDUfrffNa PU,N AI.t SECTIONS AND> DETAILS M ::I Olin.Ni 8PECIACA110NB G-4 & GROUNDING PLAN, NOTES, 4 GROLUNDI NG DET AIL. INDEX U-4 60-l] srTE UTLITY PLANS & MOTES e-, - E-41 B.ECTflCAL Pl.IHI. DWJRAMS, NCJTEI.NID DETAILS S-0-84 81CTURAL NOTER, PLANS AND (E'TARS ® UFvMEY VICINITY MAP LICENSED ENGINEER ON RECORD I .. , . - - u»U .. - - ] PUNTED NAME f nE T I LEES®R / LICENSOR PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOK EL.OW [] wocwas. [] cHAwass ==De. SE co==vra CO NTACTS EaSAKR I L)NSK' Cry OF CHANH ABO6ZN CHEL.SEA PETERSEN AS8#5TANT CITY' MANAGER} TO0 MARET SOUL.EV A CHANHASSEN, EN BESi? s2) 227-1118 CQTY OF CHANHAN8EON QE0Rae aNDR {A8eTANT COTY SNONESIER) TOO MAer OUL. EMARD PO ox 14? CHAN4ASEN, MN @g3f? Q823 227-1 184 LuES8EE POWER UTLI'TY COMPANY CONTACT: Cry Y OF CHANHASSEN EVIN ·CR0OB (UT.ITY SUPERINTENDENT) 77o0 MARET SOUL.ENARD PO Bx 4? CHANHASSEN, AN 48847 sz 227-4300 Vea2CON WOES'L.EBB 10801 BU4 LAKE RCD 8L,00.4NG7 ON, MM S5430 RON REITER 43121 720-0052 XCEL ENERGY 1516 CHESTNUT' AME MINNE/APOL.I, MN 5400 LEN .A.CO8EN {482) 307-2574 T.AD0 TL.CO UTITY COMPNY' CONTACT: THIRD7 PARTY INSPECTOR: BADGE STATE INSPECT KM KEHL.LY' MALI.HEIN P.O. 8OK ? :" ARCHITECT: SuUMEYOR: II ¢" -[E ENGI NEER: DB8ON 1 ARCHITECTS LL.C g0YO VALLEY VIEW ROAD EDeN PRARE, MIN 85344 (062) 009-0209 wt®ETH &MITH NOL.TING 60 FL.L.MORE STREET -PO 8OK 1028 ALEK/ANDRIA, MIN 88302-4028 32A-762-6140 HERZOG ENGINEER.Na, LL.fC SJ0 NCO(TH 3RDO STREET MMNEA POL.I}, MN 4i6401 {81.2) 44-1223 9usaeL.tL. ccoMPANE8, INC. 16028 MINNETONKA M.MD. BT. MANNE TONK6A, MN 58346 $062) 4931-2111 T.B.. r norooy oory tmaf tho pion, opocelot, or port woo gpeed by r ar ardor w direct peril rf tat / @ o «y Llod Prof@ail tin@er «der the iw of the Stale of Mire. Pwiae:,_Bogart. Loot! -.JP= • a7a NON: COMIC7OR TO O8TAN CURRENT FPL. SF FM DEIDRA}ION FOu Zar PRIOR? O CONSTRUCTION CO.uNEMCEMENT Signing for structural sheets $-J thru $-4 EXISTING DOA4 NI ANTENNA EXISTING ANTENNA ('BY OTHER OVERALL, STRUCTURE. MEOHF,4 po n tau.f' Ast. 7 tis' a? [a! .8RH"TA¢ I E0STNG ACCESS TUB€ e g"" y@0) ® T =4l± =4 =6f EGSTING TANK BOWL "" mare"}' ap ,-Nt t:=---- EXISTING VERTICAL. LADDER W/ PUAIFORS ('BEYOND) It; 5 AS"SAL" 1 fl arr-- i s g,A NM=#= [-\EEL 3 PLATFORM PO0FOE ERA4ENI CAMINE] ({eevow) t Y. =4 ••+7 .., I --moose UuY ouE (aero] [--Eve1 2 PtFoR _y-«OFOSED ELECT',/CONOUR7 OUTE f-EuSTING 0.H. 000R Foose aLZ. oUMED CO/-LC (-asnwG H-rue eE e ER TOMER 4 u , oz.s gwoes y g' AaL, ? (T) SO UTH EL.svAnoN ·· scus +·arr {' I F 3 g#»+wgg I holy al@yr tot fl 4pin, goo or rt of lg a or or gr il ts .., gltd Alo} for be log ofto (ow gf Moots Oser.a OE, Ag. Ma tar :l&., on, • w out: DESIGN}A 002J .L.uEeY Mew a eOaN rNE, MN OW 402 00 -a08 w.62l6gNS.XO4 vertzon' Mad} L.M L.AIE ROA 0.u00Na7oL, uM oeas erg na-o2 PROJECT 24017 1508548 L0C . COD0OE: 443891 MIN HILBERT p HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 85317 SHEET CONTENTS: CONTACT& 1e.0E .MMAY SHEET DEX OGP TMENTAL APPROVALS L.EB8OR APPROVAL PRO CT INFORMATION NREA & CI NI TY' M6AP GENERAL. NCOTES DUN g! CHECKED BY: KYL.EM g rr] g Sy.E ei S REV.D g 14.2 aggt" sane4 07.19.9 T-1 I I 7 I I I I s x A ~ V ,, K t,I ~ v~ u 3 3 % '? is» EQUIPMENT CABINET I GENERATOR TYPE: WEIGHT CAM-LOK 10,000BS DETAIL INDEX FROST DEPTH DESIGN = 4..0° DETAIL De7AL. DCRP7COM &.t TL.CO ENTRY DETAIL a.4 CMPH DETAIL 7 /3 p j BT.UNOUS PARKING I I I I I I I I I 10.1- 4G.7 { ON5-LINE FR«ER DARM {A.C. TO VERIFY) GENEIL. NONES: 1). CONTCTOR TO COORDINATE PUBLIC ANDO PRIM0E' (UNI.IT'Y LOCATES PRIOR TO cONSIU'ION SART. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT AND THE VZN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER DIELY OF' ANY LIL.UY'Y LINE ISSUES, ...,..!,!_ __ 7 { IT I' ' «2. cowmCroR SL PESTONE A.L. ARES, CLANG LANSCAPE, DASTE'D Y coMSUCTON '1DO PRE-=-COMS'UCTON COMO/TONS. } 7.TR MIEN% HOUTING ECKETS, ANIESS, EQUIET (RS / DIST BO}, tf A EOsE CANES TO SE PNMED -- SEE SPECKING » KHHHHEEHEII? I 1). COw7CTOR 'TO COORDINATE. WIN LESSOR ANDO VERD2ZDON CCONSTRUCTION EN2INEER, AND {gr.AS3:.572LA: ?355.2 ==v sews 5} CON;TOR 'IO PROME AND MSTALL. SIGNE WTHIN TME EOQUPVENT ROOM AT YO CCC"C: .:CCC SC:CCC?A'===rs"" {hetrot\y thf to lo gelatin er «gl l igr so or omfir or ill go rd fit I oo lg --- the le sf ti» e of Mirooo. o0ex7 .2. 9&, Ag. Me. ta? qllcl . 4#..@ Rs; 2 )., . ----- a» ae we «» « » « » « w «o , en » w no[{pf]pp lg NORTH ----- (+)y TFPuw ·· (h ' «er.as F E 1 (T7 DESIGN}, on8 Wu.LEY VW RD a0eN uRE, MN till@ 4lg oo-peso w.ESlNQM EI.OM verizon' 100t ti6.AH L.AMIE OMO 0.0Mgrot, ¢ 4«j@ 0423 720 -000% PROJECT 2017 1686648 LOC. CODE: 443891 MIN HILBERT - 0 EXISTING CONDITION &CAL.E: NONE arE PLAN OE7AL. DEX « KYL.E M g 99.144 G.ca. or.198. 10 A-1 olh} 1#i# Pr' 1] i -J +st 4[I s, g+1 ! s' ly +"y''r' ,.I \~ I 111 I IIJ s! j 7/!- g! a \-1 + I1 jl B l I 1 ® a ® aa,, O %a A T E i+ 4 al (3) isTva cowro • 8CALE:NO SCALE s +, Noe COCA? SHALL AAOMDE A SM ON A4.L uOR EQUIA=NT IHI «AC2ATES THE COLONE)NIS SEIM, Sa.ASS."SC» Gao.UND LDML. '1) 2MD ML AFOAu 0STANO COMUT O OE UaD O OE Laa FR u.ue) v-EISTANG VERTICAL LADDER osns u.:mY Hew RD. eneN PUE! MN 3M4 46o) o -400 ww .DON4 2I OU BUAEMI CAMOENS 7arose suer ONE (G) «sva cowpmro CALE: NO SCALE EXISTING ACCESS AITCH t hey lg tot fie pie, apoof@aflow or pl of $pl i qr arr 4ay dial op gsh lug f a qlg go] /Auiles ooor he lo of ho ii of fool. eoototr.4. 2v1, Ag. M tin le@ c 07.M.Sil verl zon 2gs 0)0M LA«IE egD .00GTOM, MM Oi4go 4129 ra coo0e EXISTIN G EQUI PM ENT cNBNETS (BY' OTHERS) EXISTI NG GUARDRAIL © < 2% < ,, HATCH N G HOST 8El ( i { ' A < A x' s EXISTING EQUPGENT s .° EARED? LE3SOR 1K ONPY ACHIN8CT IF EOMS FFGR FAON uour SHON DESIGN}, PROJECT 2501 7 1600548 L0CG . ODE: 44369 1 MIN HILBERT HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 653 17 SHEET CONTENTS: 9L.0OR PLAN AND PHOTO8 puNM BDY; YIL.E AM ECSTING UTITY EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS) 81f- CHESLA=SD BY: @ "oo PLAN @ SECOND LEVEL 8CAL.E: He" » 4-0 SOME ffi ye BS.g REV.D O2.46. a% aAg 07 .10 .8 (:) tsrva coNpmo 8CALE: NO SCALE r_; • A-21 AMUT! [reosmo] uNcnaN ] QTY [uCruet ; AMENNA KEY OOeL uno Te Ag]":]'3# l &- Jf# IF] ·] +s IA T ___ '!!\! __ "f#TE]T"[4171M y &:: a sf::-: z.5 1=.a4# ___ '!!\! __ 1 ' ---~-- :#±:++ff! » 44pMfPfRT 18l = e • = = 4 > 5tPRf 8 % • - f • • • } ---::--- __ iiii_Piir - - - --=-- --=-- = --=--- - =-- --- - ---- 111111 ·- - ----.~-------- - 3ND)PORT Al -I - 3)PORT 14e = <aqN ORr " ms -a -- 3SISE ___ !!!!'. __ ___ '!!l!: __ _w_]_ as_[ mer r I" T pa[Ty ---- J!4:! --- " 2 % +-BS" # +RS .t -•------i ..... -4 l- ]#/!] #-4 "ES--Id]-F4]rJ4]4-l=] : +ere4 #A%l=}-43f #tl:I:l:1rl:-lll:--4[3 ][ifs#lf: El i His# 2I 2¥ +-' 4#1 =1-:-+-- -~-.- - -- .--+-TD°13 } "Eggs® -Jg4]r.1r1 wr r.ls =1.5-4me 4}- 2J 2k was 33TIS!-!-1.-.1.· 2s Zr A --E--l##'--+--+-- _! __ me .13: e 4} AM0OMAL: (t) OSEUON CK, {ZDC--4020-M--40 QNstoE EUMEH7 CABINETS) (t) saeunoN sax, /2Do-oz7--PF-40 (A# toe) (1) e sec7oR 'Z (} oseuoN eo, {wzc-eod--P 4«8 (AT TOE) ('1EA} SELAOS x' a Y (1) 1-12 ,-QIIE, -fll.--12-EilD EIIIR Y) IJl-12,_IME. _fll.-1112-IID lDSB:IOR 'I') s-tZ #re Cat.E, ASE8ENGER ML-061.2--220 1O SECOR 2} ROSENBERGER MrBRID APER HM--242015 BOK TO RRLU) (Gy 'NTeaw a=ex 8CAL.E; NONE EXISTI NG (UNSTRUT CABL E LAD DER W/ PROPOSED CABLE FEEDS (Q 441=e wouwva =y a ? ? CON.ALAINA! OF' NOOSED G-12 CONE LEMONH (BOURET' CANE7 ESE OK TO SELA! '%] - BnoL. Qs" uP 0 oE) == q5--0° - HOR2DONAL. (4O' O FORAN 4 fs" 9 10sR STE= ss.¢ TEL ·1M'-$" (s) 1f. EITI8 = It'-sf'. SE 1.-4 (s 9 vex SCALE: NONE {3{' £' '#'SR.5{".3£, aw x =wr HO2oNMDL («O PLATFORM + 40' ? '70ER SE) «» g--e A =e'-# (s) 1¢. EI8 • I2S'-!' LUSE 1'-{" CNCULUATON OF PROPOSED G-12 CANDLE LENON (SELOR Z' 1O O SECO! Y! = aroL es' UP 1OE) e» a'-° - HOR2NL. (A' PLATFORM + a' TEN ST) « 13g XL. " 205'-£ (s) ¢. EXIRA + 2S'-4. SE 2'-4' they olley fat the gt, eflallo or Ago»ft # ppl fr ig or oor oar tit opelo ah o / oo idly --- the lo of the lobe of loo& «ooN72. Ow, Reg ta. tN? G2L.l. g7.A. 0 DESIGN} nA .EV Vaw I gg0N PunE, 0M Goll044 4ii} 0-4000 ww:.0»Oro XO4 verizon' o0of UM LAIL AO tL.04400MG'1'00¢, MM 9040 482} 720-02 PROJECT 201 71668648 L0C. COE: 443891 MIN HILBERT «oNE: SEE 4,/A-3 FOR gUAMEMT LAUT wes },,g s ±Ht. 12.02.12.at F.O. EXISTING TOWER t. L . 9, % 'on2 ·····I %" g-8 t, (G) Sscro z PA SCALE: 3/16 = {:g" - (Gy =cT oR v PuA SCALE; ass = 1-0 oa 4AEN as Egg sE as Rad guyer CONS T E. I (ho} pea.» ver woo. ioa/A.co) -nroL. no ()st.at{E < ww @PW s = [ HAZEL TINE BOULEV ARO CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SHEET CONTENTS : CO G ANTENNA SY ANTENNA MQA,JNTIMIG DETAIL. A-3 >>EISING CON(CREE ALL PRoose (z} ?' ¢ ef Gu.zE coMr / ENC CLNIP t/ Ua8ER CUSON, TP. (SZE ACORDON2LY'] FOR EL.ECT'L ND FIBER P0Pose s--d" {}ON2 CM!. UNSTAU} GM.ZED COMCAST /' CCONDUIT H2ER 7O UNIST.Uf FOR ALAN4 ()} PoosED 1,/4° 9 MEI --CON + CONCRETE SCRAN ANCHORS (SM2ZED') 1 1/2° NOMINAL ea, n. oNE: Poro0ED CANDRE DORNAN3 AOEMDL.IY OE I 3-d G.¢. SREY egpDD2DD y <Ca» ! L 4 r'-« L A 0 PROPOSED SHROUD DETAIL SCALE: NONE -=,:,,,,----- ..... , t I \ I I \ I \~···• .·· J • "4 • • s ' ..... ,, w» EIS TANG CONCRETE WALL lg®ED QV, PIE. SE SNII'L sen sgUaM 0ox MoUMED 1TO OX, PE MTeOR 2SR.% < ++= Srsu » SEE SmUXI'L roross usmr QE snucr'}-. 'e ones» ces sserA- -ell] 0 CABLE MOUNTING DETAIL &CALE: {"e {g "2C .ST t uMR Poro0eD AU SR.# ±'Li SIEM == SEE smA'L Por0oEeD uoUMmMG , we eE smucn,) NOTE: CONTCTOR TO ERNY £ACT L0OAT2NS OF EONS7NG CONCRETE' AENFDOROMG 8Y' x--MY PRIOR O CC:S CS SIS 2322 2. .33 2 % CONTACT THE' MATER TOMER CONSTRUCTION COFWY' ANDO G4INER NFORA)ION REGARD0NG AEIDER SE AND SPCNC AT OR MEAR THE LCATON OF THE PENETRATIONS:. ALL. PENEIRA7OMS NEED TO 8E LEAR OF OESRA&S, AND MSPELTED AND APPROVED SY THE CITY TARD wWrY INSPECTOR. Ecs1NG CONCRETE L.. _ moose os- """(_\,F2uPENT 1MOUNTING D=TA. SCALE; /2 = 1-0 EOSTING CONCRETE LL ETENS8 ooae 4 ggor r ('pwoN) (ow o AM.EK'T sME} "», NOSED CONNON.US SEAL.AMI' 6A ANOE QOEN A.CEI < {"Saar gg's ewr era No: AAl8DADAIST -Or oD Su ENS7NG REINFORCING 4S FOUND TO SE CLSER THAM 4° O.C. CONTRACTOR 1TO MOFY ARONITECT FOR THE APPWOU. OF 2" DOA. CONOAT. 0 CAB LE PENETRATION DETAIL SCALE: t"= 4.0" 4 Po0asp tD co» {aP eono} Nr-= Tot. - 4SE SKA'L I ho ooty till plan lales or apt at qpf lg so or air or silt oupollen al f a duly --- tho tor of tho at off llrwoo ONA. DMR, Ag. Mu. taMaT 2#cl , 67.40 f0 DESIGN}, as# .L.fey awe ma gN uIE, RON Gld gt) 00-ii www. Dl4NE.(X4 vertzon' Moo; uM LAI5 AD L.qNQTQ:, MM 9©al ext 7a-402 PROJECT 20171660648 LOC. CODE: 443691 MIN HILBERT HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SHEET CONTENTS: gECT0M8 ANO ET AL.8 gg CHECKED BY: wa= KY.E M FR?V. sf8 0 EQUIPMENT MOUNTING DETAIL SCALE: 4/2' = 4-0 A-3.1 "$' }y" { 111 1 ~·1 °1 z w s1 % »3ll #!'= jfy GENERAL GROUNDING NOTES: An extern al buried grou nd ring (Lead ') shall be established oround the equipment shelter and tower foundations. Lead '1 shall be kept 24 from foundotions; if found ations ore less than 48° art, keep Lood f cent ered between them , ff the tawar baas is over 20'--0 from the equipment she lter, G seporote Leod '1 sha ll be establ ished around eac h foundation, and the two Lod la sha ll be bonded with two parotel leods at [east 6 feet apart horizontally. Conn ections between the two Laod '1s shall be bi-directional All ssubgrode connections stoll be by exothermic weld, brozed weld, or gas=tight UL467-listed compr ession fittings pre--filed with anti=oxidant compound . Subg rgde connections shall not be 'cold galvanize' coated . Lead '1 shall be 42 so lid bare tin--clod {SETC) copper wice buried at local frost de pth. Leod 1 tends shall be minim um 24° ra diu s. 'Whl' ead bends m oy be of 12" radius. Ground rods shall be gofvon ized steel, 5/80, spaced tan feet apart, or as shown. Rods shall be kept min, '24 'inches from foundations, Ground rods are req uire d to be installed at their full spec ified length. Depth sha be as shown in Det ol 11,1 'in the Sta ndard Detail Booklet. SPE CIAL CON SID ERATION S FOR GROUND RODS: When groun d rod s ore not speci fied to be backfilled w/ Bento nite Slurry; f boulders, bedrock, or other abatructioes prevent driving of ground rods, the Contractor will need to have drilling equipme nt bore o ho le for ground rod placement., Hole to be backfi lled e/ Bonton#ts Slurry. Wh en specified with slurried Bentonite encoaerent, drilli ng equ ipm ent will be need to be used to te bo re o hole for ground rod placement. Slurry ha lt be mode from pelleti zed material ("Grounding Gavel); powdered Bontonits is not allow ed, If bo uld ers, bedrock, or other obstructio ns are found, Contractor sha ll drill ta the speci fied depth ond provide Bertoni'te encase ments, Above=grade connectiors sha% be by lugs w/ two =hole tong ues unless nated otherwise, joined to solid leads by wel di ng (T83 548569€ "BROWN), se lf--threadi ng (RECOGNIZED, EM 252204 .75 .5 1.2), or 10,000psi crimping (BURN DO Y YAJC 2TC 14£2). Surta ces that or galvanized or coated shall have coating(s} reroved prior to bolting. Bolts shall be stainl ess steel with flot washer on ch side of the connection and a loci waster be neath the fostering nut , Star =tooth wa sher sha ll be used between lug k dissimilar meta l (copper=to=steel, etc} but are not required between tin--clod CU lugs & tin --c lod CU bus bars. Lug tongues shot be coat ed with anti--axidont compound, and excess compound wiped clea n ofter totting. The conn ecti on sha ll the n be coated with col d-g alvan izing compound, or with col or--match ing paint, (round bars exposed to weother sholl be tin--clad coppe r, and sholl be clea n of any oxidation prior to lug batti ng. (Ba lka nized ite ms sh all hove zinc removed wthin 1 of weld area, and below lug surface conta ct area. After welding or bolting, the joint shalf be coated with cold galvan izing compound. Ground Bar, lade Gro und bars are isolated el ectric ally from tower bottoms and equi pment she#tars by their sta ndo ff mounts Leads from each ground bar to the ground ring shall be a pair of {#2 SBTC, each connected to Leod 1 ti--di rec tiona l!y with {{2 SBTC "jum pers '. Po irs ot {2 $ETC moy be required between qround bars. Leads sh ot! be ro ut ed to grou nd bors as foll ows; ® The Main Ground Bar {NG), typicotly mounted inside on the equipment shelter 'bock ' wall; or mounted {o the equipment platform steel beom. "Te Entry Ca ble Port Ground Bars (EPG), mounted inside and ou tside on the equ ipment shelter wall benea th the transmission fine port. Mot e: Tronamiasion fine 4rounds also attach to the £CPGls " The froremission tine Ground Bar (TGB) mounted at the ba sd of ths tower to which the transmission fine grounds are attached. Transmission line gro unds also attach to the TGBe. NOTE; Ca ntro ctor shoal confirm that 1CBs exist ot 75--foot vertical intervals on any guyed or self-sup port tower , ond that transmission lines are grounded to each TC3. On ly the bottom--meet TGB ls ieolata d from the tawer steel frame; upper TGBs may use the tower st eel frame as common ground, requi ring no copper legds between TC&s. {2 SHI; hia lead "Wh ip lea ds shall con nect the buried external ground ring to the foll ow in g items : Monopo le Towers: • Th ree whips to flonges on the monopole bose , at lea st 90 apa rt. If none are provi ded, ottach to the basep late or consult tower manufacturer. $elf -S uppo rt, 'Tawere: Two whie to flange(s) on each tower leg boae . If none are provided, attoch ta the baseplate or consult tower manufacturer, Guyed 'Towers: ® Two whips to flange(s) on the tower base . If none ore provided, att ach to the base plate or consult tower manufacturer. Eslobliah a Lead f within the fe nce enclosure of each guy anchor , at lea st 40 foot perimeter and having 4 gr ound cods. {2 S8TC leads shall extend up , od be clamped (bronze clamshell or equal}, to any two guy wires. NEER wld leads to the guy wires. The leod to the guy anchor 'ha nd' plate may te welded. Fsnc; Me ta tfle fence with'n 25 feet of tower Lad '1, or within 6 feat of shelter lead t, shok# have whip leads as follows: " Each corner poet, " Each pair of gate pots, " Any line post over 20'-0 from d grounded post. E ach gate leaf to 'its respective golepoat using broiled strap (35/4" tin--lad copper e/ lug ends), s fences ground quy anc hors shall be ground ed in similar fashion , Font tonks NEVER WELD to any fuel enclosure, NEMER penetrate the fuel conta inment. Meto} tonks shall hove one whip iead attac hed . Use on opproved carp or two--hole lug on on avoiloble flange. SYMBOL AND NOTE LE GEN D =(£= 442 SB1C AROUND SHELTER, TOWER , OR CUY ANCHOR ® 5/6° x 10'-0" GALNNZED STEEL. GROLND ROD (@) resr wau Pe rren ocmnow » 42 S8TC HP' LEA 9O @nsc nou was, ros, oR 1ca o uso 1 Eq uip ment. Shalter, and. {2thar Ganer! Baquiran±s; ® fxtend new Lead 215 up to sh elter halo, re making two-way connections as needed. Generator=equipped sh elters hove 6 such con nection s. Conectione with in the shelter shal l be by co mpression; NEER we ld ins ide the shelter . " Each vertical support pipe of the exterior cable bridge. Bridge end sh all be ke pt at least 6 fro m the towe r struct ure. The cobl e bridge shall be ju rpa red to the vertical support pipes with l2 SgT C at each vert ical support pipe, " pp oi'te corers of the roof shield ove r the equipment shelter. " Eoch HVAC unit sh ie ld , if separate (may be 'jumpored' to moia roof shield), " fach HVAC -package unt. e (nm erci al electric meter box. " Generator rece ptacle, if prese nt, ® Stoel building skid, if she lte r 'is metal fra me. e Fgch cir intake or exhaust fan vent louver ® fach generator vent hood or louver, " Generator exhaust stack, externol. " Opposite comers of generator support frame, if separate from she lter , ® Generator fuel tank, if separate from generator unit. ® Hoat building rain gutter , dowrspouts, and roaf floahings within 25 feet. ® Telco 4POP {'Mohn Poin t of Presence), if extemal to eq uipmen t shelter, ® Within cable vaults, ane each to the ladder and to the manhole rim, Nate: 'The door frame is connected to the interior ground ha la, and need no seporate con nectio n to the extame! gro und rin g. ti ik Iautleg Test lead f l and ground rode aft er ineto#l otion but before backfilling or connecting to any other grounding, using the J--point fall of pote ntial method , Contractor to notify Verizon Wireless senior canstructi an onginee at least 48 hours prior to testi ng . Document installation and test ceautts with photog rap hs, © AN MAC UNIT C5®) c BL.UL.DI NG COINER © 80 80LL.ARD ®) ces CABLE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST ® EL ELECTRICAL. SERVICE GROUND © CON HERCL, ELECTRI CAL METER © FAN GUY ANCHOR PLATE © FP FENCE POST @ «a GENERATOR » c CATE POST, 3/4° BRAND STRAP TO LEAF 6) cPs OPS UNIT © cur GUY MRE, WELCH. CLAMP ONLY = NO WELDS ® HL HO00 OR LOUVER ® PH3 UTSDOE OF HOFFMAN BOK © C WTEGRATED LOAD CENTER ® MG8 AN GROUND BAR @) uu GENERATOR FFLER © PG8 PORT -GROUND BAR ® RaR FOUNATON REINFORCING © RS ROOF SHELD © s8 STEEL BEN © SP SIEEL POST © SIP S1EEL. PLATFORM © TEL HOFFMAN BOX © 1G8 TOMER GROUND BR © TR TOER BASE © ye DESEL FUEL VENT PIPE Nab Contractor to provide {2 solid bare tin =clod (SBTC) copper wire lead from fl ground ring to air conditioner & ice shield if provided by VZW, ~ TOP MEW LEAD? DENTEL2ATON. .&. DESCRIPTION': 2S RING TO NEAREST LIGHTNING ROD 42 Sec 26 LS-HING RODO SYS TO NEARBY Am7 NFPA 780 1 RING, EXTERNAL. BURIED w/ RODS 42 ssc 27 RNG TO TOMER RING (2) {2 sec A RING, CONCRETE ENCASED 32 serc 2B RNG TO SHELTER RING (2) €2 ser Z DEEP ANODE (TD RIPROVE ONS) RCOO OR PIPE 29 BRANCH AC PNL TO BTTY CHG FRM NSTD33-11 3 RING TO BLDG SIL FRAM E 42 sac 30 BRANCH ADC PNL TO OUTLETS NST 3-11 4 MWN AC PANEL NEUTRAL BUS TO (2) GROUN 31 MG8/FOB TO PWR, 9TTY FRHES {2/0 -SIR ROOS, SOUTED FROM LEAD {' EC 250.86 32 431 TO BATTERY CHARGER FRAME {6 I-SIR {J Iz ssrc 33 4S1 TO BATTERY RACK FRIE {6 STR RONG TO GROUND BR 34 {31 TO PCU FRIE gs RING TO EXT MTL OB.EC7 42 sec DEEP ANODE TO MGB NSTD3.3--9 35 }31 TO D0SU FRAME 6 F-SIR AC PANEL, TO NATER. WEIER EC 29. 36 431 TO POU FRAME f6 I-STR 9 EXT MATER TO NT WATER PIPES NSTD3J--9 37 MGB/FGB TO BTTY RETURN NSTD3-14.5 A0 WT ATER PIPE TO 9C8 NST33-9 57A NG8/FG8 TO RIN TERM CARR SUPP j6 FSTR 11-12 NOT USED » ra w cs fg! S 1.3 AC PANEL TO MG8 NSTD3--9 38A FCB TO PA) CB CARRER SUPPLY ii STR 1+ GB/F8.10. BLDG ST ERA £2/0.+-SIR 39 DOC BUS DXICT TO NEXT SECTON {6 L--STR 14C MG8,/FG8 TO ROOF/NALL MT PNM 4\/0 1-SIR 4«0 DC BUS DUCT TO NG8,/FG8 j6 --STR 15 MGB/FGB TO FGB-HE SAHE FDOR {2/0 +-SIR 41A G8,/FG8 TO [58 {2/0 -STR 16 NOT USED 42 -44 MOT USED 16A ECPGB TO CABLE ENTRY RAK 41/6 1-STR 35 WAIN IC PL To SANN TE PN NSIIS=- 1 1 17 8 I0. CABLE. NL.M I& L-SIR 46 BRANCH AC PNL TO OED OUTLET NSTD33--1 1 17A ECPG8 TO CABLE SHEL.DING 46 -SIR 47 FG8 TO INTEG FRM 42 -SIR 178 uGB/F08 TO F--O SPICE SHELF j1 t-SIR 48 LEAD {fJ1 TO WTEG FRu If6 SIR 18 LON#EST MG8 ,/FG8 TO HIGHEST FG8 {2/0 -SIR 49 INIEC FRu TO EOUP SHELF BY FASTENERS 19 LEAD 18 TO OTHER FGas, <6" 42/0 -STR So Pou BTTY RET 1O l[5 [z/o -sm 20 MG8 /F38 TO 8NCH AC PNL g +-SI 51 f50 TO TRIS FRM ISO DC PMR j6 t-SIR 2A NEAREST CARD T0 DE5COE€CT PNL NEC 250.66 52 TRANS FRI FUSE TO FRI OR BAR j}8 --STR 208 CMB TO AC DISTR PNL {6 1-STR 534 N38,/FG8 TO PDF/&ar8 sTD3--22 21 9G8,/F38 TO MT LO 42 1-STR 2CS R SE FR i6 -sI 21% INTERIOR 'GREEN' WO {2 SIR {6 1-STR 218 I HN D2 II EXI RH 42 91 56 MCB/FCS TO AC PWR RADIO ITTR j6 1--SIR 21€C WT HALO TO EQUIPMENT NTL 46 F-SIR 57A NGB,/FG8 TO CBL. GRID,/RUNNAY 42/0 1-STIR 22 ROOF TOMER RINC TO ROOF GRAN D NFPA 780 58A 4414 TO ANSLE FRAME {2 -STR 23 NG8,/FG8 TO ECPG&, SAUE FLOOR j1 1STIR SSA {5&A TO EACH SGL FRAME GRND {6 SIR 234 MGB/FC8 TO CXR--HF LUNR PROT 48 1-STIR 60-89 NOT USED 24 EPGB TO EACH PROTECTOR ASSEN 8LY' 46 F-SIR 90 GENERATOR FRAHE TO EXT RING {2 s8TC 244 LDNIER PROT ASSY TH' UPPER {6 STR NOTE: AEMOE' GALE WZING FROM FENCE POST'S N AREAS £GS LL aE NSLLED. LIMTLY COAT THE UNOERSIDE OF THE LUGS W/ AMT--OX COMPOUND BEFORE ATACHNG TO POSTS. rMn{) SIDE VMEw 2 9 :.'?' (UL. 9408 LISTED U~,. CR! LLIG BELDEN g:Ly 8RED sTP GATE SB0MED TO FENCE POST ) 37 6.3.5.935732, RR 0 COMPRESSION CONNECTOR DETAILS 2 SCALE: NONE S o TPERR TPEs TE VS REINE. &? ROUNO SURFACE FLAT SURACE TYPE HS TPE GT TPE PT [I wEL.D: THO4AS &: BETTS, 548568£ "SROMNSS s 4 TE Gt LG I lgtrte fie glie, pollen oar oopoft; o pod p so or or y (loo oats af tot/ afg --- he lg of » ow ah Moak «or 4. , Ag Me soar 2@els K a7 .,so Dute rs1GN} 902a .Ley ew A gDEN PRE, MM 6MM 4ex 00-000 wow.Di{ AI 2A3AM verlzon' soot iMM L.Ai IR©MD IM.2284RN3TON, M 464688 40tg 7a0-0¢ PROJECT .2017 1686548 L.0C . CODE: 443891 MIN HILBERT HAZEL TINE BOULEVARD CHAN HASSEN MN 663 17 SH EET CONTENTS: GROUND+NG NCOTE8 s2nm4 or 0.4@ 0 EXOTHERMIC WELD DETAILS SCALE: MONE G-1 GROUNDING DETAIL INDEX N01E: NEW GROUNDING SHALL BE BONDED TO EXISTING GROUND RINGS FOUN D DURING 1HE CONSIRUCl10N OF THE STTE. DETL ] DETwL. DOeaCRwwTON 11.1 ] TEST WELL. DETAIL. GROUND RING 4 RODO DETAR t4.2 lj 8HELTER HLO DETAIL. "f REMROROUNDINQDETAL 11.4 CONDUIT OGTAIL. CONTRACTOR TO DPROMDE ANTENNA GROUND KIIS AT EACH SECTOR AND ATTACH FR> BUSS BAR LOCA TED AI EACH SECTOR ----- e < 2 '«ti I [® I PROPOSED RRU'S N DAST. BOXES (nPCAL.) ,373232.%%.¥? % w «s o ot ==n BAR PROPOSED 2,/0 GROUND LEAD FRO ANTENNA BISS BAR TO ANTENNA BUSS BAR SECTOR BUSS BAR LOCA TION w} ow fl 0 GROUNDING PLAN SCALE: NONE , \ -------- -- >-. .......... > ' s s ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I d I 10'-0° = -) © TO USE EXISTIN G CON DIT FRON AT GRADE TO ETERR_. · TEST wi < S cRNDNG Lr-s • A NSILED SY \ ~ , _ -a, 3 SD 2/0 GROUND FROI MAIN 8USS BAR S BR LOCATED / POSED ANTEN NAS r • t } 8 / UAN BUSS BAR LOCATION, ---& < A EQUI PME NT CABINET'S TO BE DED PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS ATTACHED TO WN BUSS BAR EXISTING EDU\PNENI (BY OTHERS) TPCAl. I I I I I I I I l I I I I I t holy@oaf e git, off r go o golf y so or arr 9gr «dlloll portion ad that ) am tg gold Ao uoe ho low; of he ob of lliooi e2RY' 4. Ma, g. Me. ti«iET 2@es gr. st Sl {Out DESIGN 007a L.Ley eow ND EDEM PAINE, MM GO} 4oz od-ea WW.DOG2NAG COM ver bzon! r) t.4 L.NEE M fL.A404010M, MN ill gea) ra -4oe PROJECT 2017 16888548 LOO. ODE: 443891 MIN HILBERT HAZEL TINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 66317 SHEET CONTENTS: QROLUNDAN2a PLAN GROUNDING DETAIL. NDIE NORTH © g®·" G-2 s - \eoc rFoc ®; s \ ' ' ' ' \ ' ' \ \ ' ' \ . 1 t t ER5TNG EASEMENT ' \ ' \ Sy v ' a/ } v -----------, \ 'i 1 wZ } \ \ ' \ INC ·- W/ IE1ERS X ' I \ I I \ \ ' ' \ Ag·w- ---- 00 L.E. ROMM \ '---- 0 UnUTES Poop UL.r/ocES AOMS OF NY' ] ooaEn uueaaou ER CODI / z. smN A 'LE E OM i y O .er15% ,/ oaR er Gt., unau or «2 .ou GE / 2 OECSAIL.E RAID8ONE, APPROX 280 L.F. 0 /# ll 0 SITE UTILITY PLAN SCALE: 4= 20-0° C a.E 0 EXISTING COND ITION SCALE: NONE \~ t. COMIC1OR TO COORDINATE PUBL.IEC AND PIE UITY LOCATES PRIOR T COMS1RUCTION SAME. NONIFTY 'THE ARCHITECT 0DO THE ZN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER EDMOE!LY OF AMY UTILITY LUNE ESSER. [2. EX0STING LUNDEN2AC.INN] UNITY L.SCATIONS 40E. APO«MATE AND NOV A.L. LURES ME SHOAL. COMIC0R ES NESPONS3IBLE TO 8OT DOE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES DO uusr COMUCT BOTH PuEL.IC AN PNOE; UNITY LOCANES BEFORE ENMON? [A. COCTOR SLL RESTORE ALL. AREAS, MCZ.LKANG LAN«SCAPE, DIESTEL SY CO«Sa,CTON 'TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDO/TOMS. 8 g > EISTING TRANSFORMER t F 3 t rattly t ff plo, polios or pet vote goof a av or oy allot on am ft/am4dug egfled hAllio for @ of iii of' lord oaCY'A. Mi, egg. Ale. ta«ET &20:l& , 07.L. le: DESIGN}A 6ens VLL.EN VeMW A CON PNAE, RAMIN 8NM4 4pez o ate W.D@2Na 00 verzon' 4Of AL.lH L.AMIE RD 0.c002704, MM 44@ ea, 'ra -oa PROJECT 201 7 1600548 L.0C. COOE: 4«4sag1 MIN HILBERT HAZEL.TINE BOULEVARD CHAN HASSEN MN 5631 7 SHEET CONTENTS: SITE UTLUrY PLAN AND PHOTOS DRAWN BY: DATE: a: EM.A !!. SL.g REV, D s2ml1! 07.A9.4 U-1 -~,..i,..._'I I f 1 < I 1 -;- ''IF 1 1 > I ' ' ] x I I 1 o v ''/ 'u• ! 4o . }. } ' % " V .Gg Cs l/ sup rurm moe ] nereso me sinu'kikau.- ' O 1 [ r SE AED Y UNY OMER \ ·' :1 · ' J ooe woe/uu.ea, [ ooNucroFr O \ \ MULED NW MM FER OMER [ \ I I l-i' 2{ 2: I! oMr Of' tr Y @&¢ ,,\ PULL BUX LOCATION PLAN w=ewe scus.sz -rs { 1 11 (G), FISTING coNDrTiON @ 2ND LEVEL. SCALE: NO 8CALE POo9ED EL.CANAL. OM EASTIN3 H-PiE O y XS,emro! aOE POK. 0 Lr}- a.gs A: #:? S : / SF ONER ANDO POLO¥ EASTING VRIAL. CANE ~- - ~ .cf' -i\:1111.11&. 7 -K 4 .I/ / ...... __ -,. PO0ED LL MOUM> " r J EXISTI NG UNDERGROUND UTILITY firetrap poof or foot op gpof bg r tr « «a pion of / a a ogolf Aili, or of llg of lloolg ONT 3. 1ML, Ag. M. {a«mt G2kl& , Doti: DESIGN} 4000 LL,eY Vey ape4 PROSE. 8MN ii# en ea aaa y.gaM a.CO ~ ( Poro9ED .L. «AMIE GS '- '- '- ' '- '- S '- '\ a ED ONi-o¢ t ~ PROJECT 201 7 1686548 L0C . COOE:4«43a91 ® + « ', " . ~ verizon' 3 \ 3 ',,\, 3 ©y Ago8Euw 400f I.AH LAMIE MAD L.OMMopON, MM #a {62} 7a 40ae r, ? --- ¢ {N jS <+N 1} i N Y-----K_ s z DCSTNG s < ALCE'SS V DOORS PoOEED EUAEMT 2ND uMaL. NFOM ma (pp r 1D # HAZELTINE BOLL.EMARD CHAN HASSEN MN 5681 7 SHEET CONTENTS: PL0OR LAN AND PULL.IBKOK L,OCATOM PLAN a / a L I I I I DRAWN EB: DATE Sy.A REV, EV. D U-2 olh} 111111.·• 'r f i' \a\ I' '{ 3 s' } +"y'u' ,.I \ I II I I I 'I s! j \Vi! ' s\/i hi[U • t8 3 I , a a "a4%% O J 4% uo: co«CAR SHALL. POMDOE A SP ON AA.L MAJOR EQUIA0ENT THANE OO'Es ME COMMENDS NEME (@), tsrG coDmo SCALE: NO CALE ' \ ENSO SL.ERMED FLOOR OPENNO 17O E UDE FOR UL.IY CON0URS8 PNO OX.MD LEL. 17NO 1ND LNEL. PA.ANOlAM {EasNG cour 1o E Use e RE ua. FRR URE} ....-90STHl$ VERTICAL LUNDDER holy orligr thot hie pl, tfall or {got pogmod by o or or y foot uporig a) ft I a a g gted Avelor emior oe loge of hr fief Moote evY.a. 0aE, Aug Me ti# G./, s7.so.a DES IGN} 407s we. IV Vaw R. e0e4 PE, MN 06M4 p0a) oc-oaoo .D6Oil.OM verlzon' 9q0of .AM LAI; MD t,OO0Ma7OM, MM 4a get) rao-«oat PROJECT 20171588548 LOC. ODE: 443891 (s) IsTws cowmo SCAL.E: NO 3CALE EXISTING EQUIPMENT e =9"° ESSIE., LUE3SOR TO MOPY ANCHNTeCT F EOMS OFFER FOM Au.UMr' SHON MIN HILBERT HAZEL. TINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 55817 SHEET CONTENTS: Lu0Ort PL/AM AMD PHOTO ECSTING UTILITY EUP&ENT (BY OTHERS) 0 FLOOR PLAN @ SECOND LEVEL SCALE: 3/16° = 1'-0° owe: soE (2) isnva coNro SCALE: NO 8CALE r 'z7 2 a A-2.1 ANTENNA KEY AZuITH [POso] FuNCON ] qr [uuCruER ] uo0EL uo Te 2gg;]A"[ g5# [fS / .fZZ I an1 a ; ---~-- 81f7!T- ms" 4s #+BR+:-}- 3AR- SN: _w j as'_{_1as# Lr] ° ll1[man re» .s = am ] t.[!- ___ '!l!!: __ [#=} }4if j#s .J..L - -- ---- ------- ------------ ---- 22 1/a - •. 2Po res-«4 _w'_]_roan' _[_ 1as _l __ r L° =1.=4eme 4}- 715.4mm9 44 IS+=l:+ -3# It: 1SI-:+:1 #S {SE -- - --1-- - -- .E _r __ =1..5.49 [} =4-:4F° 4- 1 ---~-- "[f[+ {== s: ER 4:= -szz-Ks: _w ] \9# [ t 1. 1. r ym 4 ee]) i1guy [ L _1 -T- F - 12 ---~-- "i##+] s 1.8 - ' ---"gytr as -«% TE ]:T---7 #T #ISL:}:} 3# \#T: #+l:I= F 4 IR: - 4F w Jar_[_es# L T --5--4£, =1 4ee[} s It=1= Lmel} =1.=.4.rm1.4}- ---Eh-:--4fP-[-]- I aA ors2 Z 0 { - - ---=--- ---.,- .. ---- -=-- --=-- = - - 3HI 4-----}; 2 l,leer l Dua I i I ------ - ---=--- ---=-=---- _ _ -;- --=-- 1-:=+-=--t--.---,r.- ff ] = = = « = ---~-- ---~-- +#T !}-# Sm" I#S} F-Jr J44 -{] =-}f]} #1+:l: IF-3: I#W:[: [=]:{: lH-=-4@"IL #}CI=l:#S I4II:+:= FE = ll= 4f4? l,,j]33J]]]]Q]]Jg3J3,3],J 4 ANNON!: (t) osmaunoN CK, feaC- -«20-..-40 saoE. eusvr CANNES) (f) osaunoN ex, {C--Os27- PF 40 (AT Toe} ('1) e sEr;ToR Z (} sunaN OK, {2DC--Ooo7-PF--40 (AT 1OE) ('15A} e sEaoS X' & Y' (t) G--12 ran NL.E, ROSENBERGER ML-=st2-160 {EHEMI TO SECOR 'K) i .. ,. ,..__!!E., .,_Y.) 4-1Z MrO CABE, AOSENBEN2ER ML--612-220 O SECOR '2') z} OsEa£RCER MrRD APER HM-2M2a015 BOK O RR) 0 ANTE NNA KEY SCALE: NONE EXISTING UNIST®UT CABLE LADER W/ PROPOSED CABLE FEEDS (2) 481ENA MouNrG K=Y a ? ,/ CA.ANN OF PROPOSE G--12 CALE (ENON (RIA@Mr CANET ST. OK 'TO SE3OR ') • aICAL. {gs' UP 7OE) <== g5-0 HORSZDONAL. (0° O PAAFORM 4 ts' O TONER ST= 35.-d° IHI = '- (s) 1f EIIIA. = IA'=Sf IUSE. 1Sa-If {12' /'#SR;J".3£.=w es x =w r - HOA2ONL (9 O PLAN0AM + 40' O 10ER S1} == g0.-d° AI» I'-Sf (s) 1¢ EXIA." 1TS'-4 SE. 10'- CL.CLATON OF PROPOSED G--12 CANDRE LEN7AH (SECOR 2!' TO TO SECOR Y ygmot (er u» e ta) + gs-g - HOR2ML. (Ao' UNFORN + a0 0 10ER SAM) « 12-¢° X» =2S'-¢ (s) 1¢ EXIRA, = 215.-4. SE 22¢'-4¢ { hoy ooly tot the gle palliates gr ggt oe p9 bg gr odor or oft 0upon ors} tif / op tlgg --- ho o of ho be of lroll oar.z. i&, Ag. Me. tMr g22cl 2 497.4. 40 psrGN}A a0na AL.EY aW A Ee2eN wuea; ov too¢ $0a0g 900 -4o wow. lll0000P. Q00¢ MONE: SEE 1/-J FRO! g3UNAEMT .LAYOUT oues (nu) tic.:MIN Lid- 19.02.1L. s ®9re SCALE: MONE F.0. EXISTING TONER t4 ·-·j xw" &e aroa AN(ENA ver'zon' ooT ui4 L.ANOE AD tL.Q40Ng7OM, 6 o« 4et2g n2-ea PRO,IECT 201716808648 LOC. CODE: 443891 MIN HILB ERT HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SHEET CONTENTS : COAX G ANTENNA KEY ANTENNA MOLIN'TNG EE'TAIL. cods rs:.: s= DRUAMN EBY: YL.IE AM o=4_ k: f. t st %, CHECKED g9BY: RUAN fr: 557 .A A s T e C .A8 h MD OARE Ti .0 or.1 • ea Z G) Sec1oR z Pu (G) 6cToR Y PuA 0 SECTOR 'X' PLAN -- ffi I A-3 SCALE; $/46 = 4- 1 scau=we -rr f 5 1, SCALE: 3G" = 4-0 EST NG CONCRETE ALL PordsEe ( ? ¢ Bur eNwzD cour / 8NG CUN t/ eseR cUSHON, TP. (SIZE COON7L.Y'} FOR EL.ELCT'L. AND HER PoPosE t:--o {goNG GNV. UNSRU) POP0sED CNMZED CONDUIT R/ CONDA.NT HWEIR s7EeN TO (UMSTRAUT FOR ALARM k a . ~ go x.---ED 1/4 4MLI} KV-CON + COMEE scReN ANCHORS (SNMZED'} 1 1,/2° wOuAN eat, n NoNE: P2POSED CARE MORN? AERY' «SILL.ED 7 3'-" GC. VERELA'Y □ =,-" # ; <CA» Y ----~ 14 ONGE SHEET MEIL SHAUD MEG 1O aaH 7ER {EN OP a oona) J s's -L n4 0 PRO POS E D SHROUD DETAIL SCALE: NONE EC0STI NG CONCRETE MALL Pia£D GAMM. AIE, seE smuN'L PoosED SELAN Sax ouMEaD TO NE, PE «eaeoe fitQg Ill »h 7UNANG ANET srSIEM -- SEE STICI'L 0 EQUIPM E NT M OU NTI NG DETAIL SCALE: 1/2 = 40 Pora ({er snucr'}-! morose cus ser -s- -fl]lll] @) CE euvn o Der ~. ~~-.- .. - .. - .. - ............. '. I• I I.• I • " 1 I . I \~··· ... J » I \ ... ·.· .· .. ··• . I • 4 ? P42.4% %« "2CL.ZS -= r w gOE--=]] RS!E: +<Li SSEBM » SEE Suer', POoaED 0UNG PE «E smucar'} NOT&: CONTRACTOR TO ENVY ENACT LOATONS OF E0STING CONCRETE AENFORCNG SY' X-«MY PRIOR TO CS 3S S CCC25C 2% 2 432.C3 27 % OONT7ACT THE ATER TOMER CONSTRUE7TKON COMFY' AND MIMER NFORA 7TON AEMA0OING REIER? SK2E ANDO SPANG AT OR NEAR THE LOCATION OF 'HE PENE®MONS:., ALL. PENETRATIONS NEED TO 6E AR OF OE8ARIUS, ANDO NSPELT7ED AND APRONED SY' THE CNN'Y THIRD WPTY NSPECTOR! E0SING CONCRETE u.- _ moose o- ""(=)F OU w E N T M O U NTI N G D =TAI . 3 SCALE:AI2=t-0 MOTE: -our OlD 30.uU F ENSING RENFORCING S FOUND TO 8E LOSER TW 4° &.G CONIC'TOR TO NOIFY ARCHITECT fROR THE APPAOL OF g 9A. CONDO#T. 0 CAB LE PENETRATION DETAIL ETeg} 4 ooa» 4° ooor r ('rw«) per no uwKN A-CeT auE) , AO 08ED COMTOIS SEAMI sA SOE (OOH A.CEr ca.) t 0ED SD GP (OP aorO} PwMr-- not - EE S9XL Po08ED AMEN • g,g ww we EXISTING CONC RETE WALL { only olliy hut tie gt olialiot av Ast spa r 0 of a algr iii polo oref foot / ao (tl --- tho ow oaf to @ate af rote. o0ea.2 MR Ag M». tMr 2@± or.4e. o DESIGN} Sora VALLEY VI2M , tD63N PAE, &0N } peg 0oo-aoo 9ioV.Dali» SEIP.4OM ver'zon' 100o} 0M LANIE AO 0L.00G7OM, ot a«ao 4ett} 72-4002 PROJECT 20171688648 LOC. CODE: 443601 MIN HILBERT L.--NOSED U-SOUS (TM} HAZEL.'TINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 55817 SHEET CONTENTS: gc7ON AND» ETA.S A-3.1 3 GENERAL. GROUND ING NOTES: An @xtaro# buried grou nd ring (tood '1] shail be established around the equipment shelter and tower found ations. Lead '1 shall be kept 24 from foundations; if found ations ore less than 48 apart, keep Lead '1 centered tebwoan them. If the tower boa is over 20--0 from the equipme nt she lter , o sepa rate Leod f sha ll be establi shed around each found ation , nd the two Load fs shell ta bonded with two parallel leads at east 6 feet apart horizontally. Con nections between the two Lead 1s shall be bi-directional. Al subgrade connections sholl be by exothermic weld, brazed weld, or gas=tight L467-listed compression fitting s pre--filled with anti oxidant compou nd. Subgrade connections shall pf be 'cold galvanize' coated , Lead '1 shall be {{2 solid bare tin--clad (SSTC) copper wire burled at local frost depth. Led f bends shall be minimu m 24 radius. 'Whip' kead bends moy be of 12° radius. round rads shall be galvanized steel, 5/8'0, spaced ten feet opst, r as shown, Rods shal l a kept min. 24 'inches from foundations. Ground rods ore requ ired to te installed ot their full specified length. Depth shall be as shown in Detoil 11.1 in the Standard Detail Booklet. SPE CIAL CONSIDERA TIONS FOR GRO UND RODS: When ground rods ore not specified to be backfilled w/ Bentonite Slurry: If boulders, bedrock, or other obs tructio ns prevent driving of grou nd rods , the tontroctor will reed to hove dril ling equipment bore o hole for ground rod placement. Hole to te backfilled e/ EBentonite Skurry. When specified with slurried Bentonits encasement, drilling equipment will te need to be used to be bore a hale for ground rod plocemant. Surry sholl be rode from pelletiz ed material (Grounding Gravel"); powdered Berta nite is not allowed. f boulders, bedrock, or other obs tructio ns are found, Contract or sholl dri# ta the specified depth and provide @entonite encasements, Above --g rade con nections shall be by kugs w/ two--hole tongues unless noted otherwise, joined to solid leads by welding (7&B 548568£ "BROWN"), self- threading (RECOGN IZED, EM .252204.75.312), er 10,000sl crimping (SURNDOY YA.SC 2TC 14£2). Surfaces that are galvanized or coated shall have coating(s) removed prior to baiting. 8alts ehol l be sta inless stee l with flat washers on och side af the connection ond a lock washer benegth the fasteni ng nut. Star--toath washer shall te used between lug & dissimilar metal (cop per-to =steel , etc) but are not required between tin--clod CLU lugs & tin--clod CU bus bore. Lug tong ues shall te coated with anth --oxidant com pound , and exess compou nd wiped cieon after bolting, The con nectio n sha ll then be coated with cold=galvanizing compound , or with color--matching paint. Ground bars exposed to weother shall be tin--clad copper, and shall te cleon of any aid otion prior to lug bolting. alvonized items shall hove zinc removed with t of weld area , and below lug surface contact are a. After welding or bolting, the joint sha# be coated with cold galvanizing compound, iround Ear, lade 3round bars are isola ted electrica lly from tower bottors and equipment shelt ers by the ir stand off moun ts. Lod s from each ground bar to the » ground ring shol l be a pair af #2 SBTC , eoch con nected to Leod 1 bidi rectiona lly with {#2 SBTC "jumpers'. Pirs of {2 SBTC·moy be required between ground bors. Loads sholl be routed to ground bars as follows: • Te Ma in ro und Bar (MGB), typically mounted inside on the equipment shelter 'bock ' woll; or mounted {g the equipment platform steel beam. " The Entry Cable Port Ground Bars (ECPGB), moun ted inside ond outs ide on the equipment shelter wolle benea th the transmi ssion line port. Note: Trans mission ine ground s also attach to the EC9Ggs " Te Tora mission Line Ground Bar (TG B) mo unted at the boe of the tower to which the transmission fine grounds dre attached. Trammigion line grounds olso attach to th» TCBe. NOTE: Contractor sholl confirr that TCBs exist at 75--foot vert ical interva ls on ony guyed or self-=sup port tower, and that tronsmission lines are ground ed to each TG8, Only the bottom--moat TGB ls isolat ed from the tower steel frame; upper TGgg may use the tower steel frame as camno n ground, requiring no coppe r legds between TC3. 2 35TC Yhiz. lsxti Wh ip leads shal l connect the buried ext ernal ground ring to the following items : Monopole Towers: • Thres whips to fing es on the monopole bose, at least 91' apart, f none are provi ded, attach to the base plate or consult tower manufacturer Self--Support Towe rs: • To whips to flange(s} on each tower leg base . f nane are provided, attoc h t the baseplate or consult tower manufacturer, Guyed 'Towers: " 'Two whips to flange(s) on the tewer base, tt none are provided, attach to the bose plote or consult 'tower manufacturer, e £st abli sh a Lead 1 within the fence enclosure of each guy anchor , at lea st 40 foot perimeter and having 4 ground rode. /2 $81C lods shall extend up, ond te clomped (bronze clomahell or equal ), to ony two guy wires. NEVER weld leds to the guy wires. The lead to the guy anchor 'hand' plate ray be welded. fences; Moto llic fence withi n 25 feet of tower Lad '1, or within 6 fee t of she lter lead 1, shall have whip lea ds oa follows: fach corner poet. " Each poir of gale gosts. " Any kine post over 2'--D° {rem a grounded post. " fEach gate leaf to its respective g0tapost using braided strop (3/4", tir--clod copper w/ lug ends), ® fenc es ro und guy anchor shall le grou nded in similar fashion . fve! tanks; NEVER WELD to any fuel enclos ure._ NEVER peretrete the fuel containment. Metat tanks shall have one whip gd attac hed . (he on pproved clamp or two=hol e lug on an ava ilable flan ge. SYMBOL AND NOTE LEGEND (f+ l42 sBfC AROUND SHELTER, TOMER., OR CUY ANCHOR lg 5/8" Y 10-0" GALANCED STEEL GROUND ROD (@ resr wau are cmo >{2S3TC NH?' LEAD ®[)ism mu as, Poca, oR 1ca o uo 1 Equip?rat Shaltar. and, 2ther Gao] Baq uicc@ta; fxtend new Lead 218 up to shelter halo, remakin g two--way connections as reed ed. Generator=equipped shelters have 6 such connections. Connections within ho shelter shall be by compression; NEVER weld inside the shelter, " Each vertica l support pipe of the ext erior cable bridge. Bridge end shall be kept at least 6 from the towe r struc ture. The coble bridge shall be jumpared to the verticol support pipes with ff2 $BTC ot each vertical support pipe. " Opposite corers of the roof shield over the equipment, she lter. Eoch HAC unit atield, if seporote (may be 'jurnpered' to main roof shield), " Each HC package unit, ® armerciaf electric meter box, " Canerator recept acl e, K present. ® Stoel building skid, if sheller is metol frome, e fgch oi intkue or exhaust fon vent louver, Each generator vent hood or louve r, % genera tor exh aust stac k, exte rnal. " Opposit e comers of generator support fror e, if eporate from shelter , Generator fuel tonk, if separate from generotor unit. ® Host buildi ng rain gutter, dowrspouts, ond roof fleshings within 25 feet. • 7elco POP (Mai Point of Presence), it exte mal to equipment she ker. ® Within coble voults, one each to the ladder and to the manhole rin, Not e; The door frame is connected to the interior ground hals, ond reed no separate connection tg the exemal ground ring. ioanectio &: Tauting Test keod #t and ground rods ofter instollotion tut before backfilling or connecting to any other grounding, using the 3-point fal} of pate ntlot method . Contr actor to notify Verizon Wireless senigr onstructi an eng ineer at least 48 hours prior to testi ng. Document installation ond test reaults with photographs. © A ANC UNIT c1B) sc BUL.DANG CORNER ® BO BO.LARD © Cas CABLE BRIDGE SUPPORT POST © EL ELECTRICAL SERVICE GROUN D ® COM MERCIAL. ELECTRICAL HETER $) FA GUY ANCHOR PLATE © FP FENCE. POST ®@ ca GENERA'RR A c CATE. POST , 3/4° BRAN D STRAP TO LEAF ® GS SP'S UNIT ® GUY GUY ME; MECH. CLUMP ONLY = MO MEL.DS ® HL HO00 OR tOUVER © H3 OUTSIDE. OF HOFFMAN BOK ® uc WTEGRATED LID CENTER © NG8 uN GROUN D BAR ® MI GENERATOR UFFL.ER © PCB PORT GROUND BAR 6 Roe FOUNDA TION REIN FORC ING ® RS ROOF SHELD © SB STEEL BANH © SP STEEL. POST ® STP STEEL. PLATFORM © TL HOFFMAN BO © TG8 TOMER GROUND BR © TR TOER BASE ® ye OES EL FUEL VENT PIPE Nob Controctar to provide /42 said bore tin--clad (SBTC) copper wire lead from ff ground ring to air conditioner & ice shield if provided by VZM. + TOP MEW LEAD DEATFEATKOA. &. DESCRIPTION; 25 RING TO NEAREST LICH7N IN; RO 42 S8TC 26 LGHING ROO SYS TO NEARSY MT NFPA 760 1 RING, EXTERNAL BURIED w/ ROOS 42 Sec 27 RNC TO TONER RING (2) 42 sec 1A RING, CONCRETE ENCASED 42 s8TC 28 RNG TO SHELTER RNG ('2) 42 setc 2 DEEP ANODE (TO IPROVE OHIS) RO0 OR PIPE 29 BRANCH AC PNL TO BSTTY CHG FRM NSTD3J--11 3 RINC TO BLDG STL. FRAME j2 SSTC 30 BRANCH AC PNL TO OUTLETS NSTD33-11 4 MANN AC PANEL NEUTRAL, BUS TO (2) GROUND 31 9GB/FGS TO PMR, 9TTY FRIES 42/0 -STR ROOS. {SOLU TE FROM LEAD {{1 NEC 250 .66 32 4S1 TO BATTERY CHARGER FRAME j6 1-SIR RING 1 GROUND BAR (J }2z ssc 33 431 TO BATTERY RACK FRAME [& -SI RING TO EXT MTL OB€CT 42 SETC 34 4Bi TO PCU FRAE pg"" DEEP ANOOE. TO uG8 NSTD3J-9 35 431 TO DSU FRAME -STR AE PAWL IQ MATER. VETER MC 282.66 36 431 TO PDU FRANE j% 1-SIR 9S EXT WATER TO INT MATER PIPES NSTDJ--9 37 MGB/FGB TO BTTY RETURN NSTD3--14.5 10 NT WATER PIPE TO 4C8 NST33-9 37A NG8/FGS 'TO RIN TERM CARR SUPP j6 1-STR 11-12 MOT USED » nave f#,58 13 AC PANEL TO uG8 NST0.335--9 38BA FGB TO PDU GB CARRIER SUPPLY --STR HM2RB/FD&2.10. LG ST FRE £2/0.-51R 39 DC BUS DUCT TO NEXT SECTON j6 1--STR 14C MGB,/FGB TO ROOF/NL.L MT. PM 41/0 -SIR 40 DC BUS DUCT TO 9G8,/FC8 if6 --SIR 15 MG9/FGB TO FGe--IE SAME FLOOR 42/0 -SIR 414A NG8 ,/FG8 TO j#58 {2/0 1-SIR 16 NOT USED 42-44 NOT USED t6A ECPCB TO CABLE ENTRY RAX 41/% -SIR 45 AN TE TO BRA IE [RSTIS-1 17 w 12.¢A@.£. Me.MG t6 -SIR 46 BRANCH AC PNL, TO DED OUTLET NSTD33--11 17A ECPG8 TO CABLE SHELD'NG 46 1-STR 47 FGS TO TES FRH j2 -SIR 178 MGB/FGB TO F-O SPUCE SHELF }t -SIR 4B LEAD {4S1 TO WTEG FRN [6 STR 18 NEST MG8,/FG8 TO WGHEST FG8 42/0 1-SI 49 IMTEG FRM TO EGU? SHELF BY FASTENERS 19 LEAD 18 ') OTHER FGls, <6' {2/0 -SIR SO Pu BTY RET TO [51 J/6 +-sm 20 vc8/F38 TO BRANCH AC PNL {g +-smR 51 450 TO TRANS FRM ISO DC PR }6 --SIR 2M NEAREST GRAND TO DISCONNECT PNL NEC 250.66 52 TRANS FRM FUSE TO FRM OR BAR f8 SIR 2008 GM8 TO AC DOSTR PNL fs 1-SIR 54 9G8,/FG8 'TO POF/&OFH NST0SJ--22 21 MG3,/FG8 TO IT HA.O j2 1-SIR + ·g/gsoc ssvcs g 21A INTERIOR 'GREEN' HNO 42 -STR 55 MG TO CABLE AT ENTRY -STR 21£ NI M4.D2. 10. EXI RH {2 56 MCB/#CB TO AC PVWR RADIO X«TTR {6 5TR 21C NT HALO TO EQUIPMENT MTL {6 1-sTR 57A G9,/FG8 'TO C&t. GRDO/RUNAY {2/0 STR 22 ROOF TOMER RING TO ROOF CRND NFPA 780 58A {4A TO A#SE FRANE 42 -sTR 235 NG8,/FG8 TO ECPG& SAME FLOOR {1 -STR 59A 458% TO EACH SGL FRAME GRND {6 STR 23% NGB/FGO TO CXR-Hf' LUR PROT 46 -STR 60-89 NOT USED 24 ELCPGB TO EACH PROTECTOR ASSEMBLY' {[G 1=-STR SG GENERA TOR FRAE TO EXT RING {2 s9TC 244 LDNMER PRT ASSY THO UPPER {6 -STR MOTE: REMONE' GAL A2SMG FReOI FENCE POST'S N AREAS LUGS LL, SE NSALLED. LICHT Y COAT THE R2AC 2S 32Y ATACHING 1O POSTS. cu.mn(] SIDE VMEw 32J?? {2' Ut. 940¢ LISTED U~,., CRE IG eE2.DEN M::" aw0ED ST? c we &5 88 • re i/ 3/44° BRIOED TNED COPPER JAMER STR 0 COMPRESSION CONNECTOR DETAILS SCALE: NONE Ss TPE RR TE VS TE VG REMF. 8R ROUND SURFACE FLAT SURFACE []] ELI:; THO/AS BETTS, 548569£ "SRONSS s 4 TE es TPE GT TPE PT rPE G uG I bog tytat ite lt, ppgllogin ar 4gt; oped b o er and we dost opom al ti ) an thy gold Aotioo fir the log of' the if Mooed 2AlilRT l MAE, Ag. te fear G2.-! gr,4t. t (ot; DESIGN} OE2 L.L.#Y Mew a e0e weE MN ii# 4e2) god -ea ww.GD2NS IP .XAM verlzon' 40} 00M LOE 0OD> .q0040007OM, MN 4a et ra-oooe PROJECT 204 7 1686548 LOG. GODE: 443891 MIN HILBERT HAZEL TINE BOA.EVARD CHAN HASSEN MN 6317? SHEET CONTENTS: GROUND ING NCO'TEB 0 EXOTI-IERMIC WELD DETAILS SCALE: MONE G-1 GROUNDING DETAIL INDEX NOTE: NEW GROUNDING SHALL BE BONDED TO EXISTING GROUND RINGS FOUND DURING 1HE CONSlRUCl10N OF THE SITE. DETAL. ] ETAL, DECRIPTON ft.4 ] TEST WEL.L. DOE'TAL. GROLUND RUNG & RODO DETAIL St.2 ] HELTER HAL.O DETAL 11.3 J] ER GROUNDING DETAIL. 11.4 ll CONUrT ETAL CONTRACTOR TO PROMDE ANTENNA GROUND TIS AT EACH SECTOR AND AFT{AH 'TFO BUSS BR LDCATED AT EALH SECTOR IN SELECTOR BUSS BAR LOCATION . I t y PROPOSED RRU'S ND DINST. BOIES (nPCAL) PROPOSED 2,/0 GRO UND LEAD FROM ANTENNA BUSS BAR TO ANTENNA BUSS BAR PROPOSED 2/0 GROUNO LEAD FROM ANTENNA BUSS BAR TO ANTENNA BUSS BAR ano SECTOR BUSS BAR LOCATION- 1==g] NORTH (=) 9®ouwmvs Pu l susos (T7 I 3 ·/ / ' \ p s Le J \· -- - .... .... .... < ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '\ '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I Alp .;~-~~ ----- .A.° 2®- ....4.40..n.. E4£ %h isrua. r ace 1o smog r Zsr au < PeoPosED GRUNNG )>-- TOE STALLED BY ' ~ .... _ ---- _.9OP0SEO 2,/0 GROUN D LEAD FROZ MAIN BUSS BAR s TO BUSS BR DCATED /> \@oasno m as } 3, s z sol PROPOSED AN BUSS 9AR LOCATION_ ---& € 4 A85 9 /\\ ·+s o+e 33+-> 33ff,8333,3535 3.5 ANDO ATTACHED) TO AW BUSS BAR t heir golly thof ti ll, potion as pot; wa pool or oror a de plat atoll tp I a h gild Aoil. utr he log of e it of Moro oar a OL, Ag Me {tin \. 10'--0° EXISTING ECUNFP ENT (BY OTHERS) TYPICAL / } I I I I I I I I I I I I G22., toles DESIGN} 907» we.Lgy ewW gamy PRE, AiM # 4s2) 60-42g WW.D3AON SAP.334 verlzon' of 1M.AM L.AG ACMDO 4.44040rroN, MN ilea 02g pa-c PROJECT 201 7 1586548 LOC. CODE: 443891 MIN HILBERT HAZEL.'TINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MIN 65317 SHEET CONTENTS: 2RA.NDAN PL.AN GROUNDING DETAIL. NDEX OYL.G M 08.6.T7 NORTH © sew "" [ 1e: G-2 0 EXISTING CONDITION SCALE: NONE \ ® s Ro> \eoc ©; \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ --° s 1v , ~, \ v v + 'GI • + v -------------- s s 1 I 'x, wit/es r v \ I v 1 v , \ 'u.. y. \.,, x30°x#" D g morose or/cEis HS OF W: f Pooas uEeaNOUND FER cOMAr : PuL., 5NO NEE E Poi M> g Cy .as:5 : ,/ ER O! $.C, MMMAV OF 42° SE.OM OE / .2 EJECTA®ALE RAIOONS, APO! 230 L.F 0 ,'/ /10 0 SITE UTILITY PLAN SCALE: t" = 20-0" otC So&E POWE R TYPE: 120/240V, SINGLE PHASE, 200 AMPS t. COMIC7NOR TO COOR2IATE PU.UC AND PIE URL.IY LOCATES PRO? TO COMSARCINO} STAIE'. NCONFY THE ARCHITECT DO E VIN CONSTRUCTION EN2NEER ESAELY OF AMY UL.UTY LUNE SSE8, 2 ESRING UNDERGROUND} A/LU}Y £.CANS ME PRON7E. ANDO NOT AM.L. Un.nIES «ME SHOAM. COMIRCOR S NESPONS3IBLE TO NOT DAGE UMDERGA0UND UTILITIES D MIsSr COMoUCT BOTH Pu8IC NI PRAM0IE' UTRLIJY LOCATES BEFORE EMMS [3, COM'CIOR SHNL. RESTORE ALL. ANES, MC.LRANG LNMDSCAPE, DISTURBED DEY CONSUL:TAOM TO PRE-=CONSTRUCTION cOMDOmToNs. A gr > EGSTING TRANSFORMER t hoer eotyr of tho glo, pgbegan ar opot o pf by or tr dig} opig f tit or we old Ao, utr o log of o lot of iioool NT.L Ow, Ag. Ma. {Ma G2A. - DESIGN} 02J ELEY VESW NIE gpeN voE A0N a04 qe2} a -aaa WW.lNON SIP. CO44 verizon' 000f fl4 LAllE ACAD OL.00G7OM, MM 0-4#a@ 4e29 7a0-406 PROJECT 201 7 1686548 LOC . CODE: 443891 MIN HILBERT HAZEL TINE BOULEVARD CHAN HASSEN MN 56317 SHEET CONTENTS: BmT± UTITY PLAN ANDO PHOTO8 DAMN BY: tATE: EV. A La c2.2A (e EV. D O7 4%.0 I p 1 U-1 © EX ISTI NG CON DITIO N SCALE: NO 8CALE (@)y FISTING CONDITION @ 2ND LEVEL CAL.E: NO 8CALE Po0ED BL.ECOL. OM EN0NAO H-PE ' gr C.eAAOM AKE #PK. 0 LF- 7 RS.AS CL RS fSS S HZ: { OF OE! ANDO SOLO! EASTING VTIC2AL. ONIE LIER '1NO aND LEM --¢ \ v / >4% Poro0g ML. MouNED- r" "o£,-! I I 'y' I I 1' ' - 1 • s S % s \ ' I I I I ' ( 'o I I / ' aass } ;/ '/· soup rureemoMe \ [ morose» men srinauku. O 1 [ -·-·-- ~ \A , L i ' OED ND ,-i/= jA us» {/ o/ \IISIIIWII ·--- V \ , 'v [ v ] au -v•••--• I \ EB ME/L. O, t KE OM I + » I mar or : N a¢. (2) UH#ux LOCATION PLAN ·=we scu:ssz -rw ! F 1, l, (Sy isniva cowmo SCALE: NO 8CALE ' ' , ' ' s ' ' '\ olr ally it trio gill, pollution or map gpod hr a arr y il oproo oaf 4of / a or lg oohed Ao@let ir e ghfpfgbgf loot «ORTZ. DMM&, Ng. e. t«Zr G2! or.6.0 DESIGN\ ~ ( P0rose) .L. MoAED gPS 0098 W L.EY VIEW AID. eoet rouRaE, AN 00gW 4ex) oo aa ww:.260l4820% verizon' of AL.NM L.AMIE ACMD .00Mg1oN, MM di {603 '7a -o00e I 3 o \ . 3 ',,,\, I Q s @ ooR uAw 'l SCALE:AB=4-G" / ,/---- +, <, 1 '~•, N I 1¢ ~---- ACCESS s? DO0b0RS e 2DO on? of =p NORTH \ EB ·f 8 \ \J/-orii s-us ' -~ PROJECT 2017 4 666548 n LOG. CODE:443891 \8 % MIN j\ "ss 3 ~ HAZEi.TiE IIOIA.e/ARD E CHANHASSEN MN 56317 SHEET CONTENTS: FL.0OR PL.AN ANDO PUL.LIBOX L.OCATON PLAN i I % i KYLE M gA.14.12 au/AM 16.17 10. s.2A4 O7.,49.48 U-2 KEYE D N O TE S V 7 7 7 XCEL ENERGY' 3 THE POWER PROVIDER. LEIN MCOB&BEN I8 THE DO€BONER THAT RE=VIEWED THIS PRIG7 AT XCEL 052-$80-3574 - OFICE} UTILITIES ARE ALREADY' IN PLACE AT THIS &{TE. ELECTRICAL. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE OPEN METER SOCKET IN METER 8TAC ON EXISTING H-FRAME {TOP LSFT MOST' METER}. PROM E 200A BREAKER AND OIBCONNEC_T. COORDINATE FEEDER ROUTING FROM DACUNTO'T THRO\.UK3H Ex8T71NG 8TU9-JP IN TOWER TO LC ON SECOND FLOOR OF TOWER WITH PROPERTY OWNER. 8EE ONE-LINE DAGRAM ON SHEET E-2 FOR FEEDER &ZING. SEE UTILITY DRAWINGS FOR TEL.CO DETAIL.S. PROVIDE TEL.COFIB6R RACEWAY PER SPECIFICATIONS. PROVIDE PLACARD ON NEW BERVKE (CONNECT {PGR NEC CODE] PLACQUE SHALL IDENTIFY THAT MULTIPLE SERVICE DISCCONNECTS EXIST. LABEL. TOP LSFT MOST METER AS VZW8 [,,r oz raus me PE UNITY LOGES PoR To CONSCIOUS] SARE. MORIN HE AACME'CT D 'ME a# cCsmucat ENtEIER EVELY OF ANY UNI.UY' LINE SUER, a. ENC UNESCO\MD Ur.In¥ LeCAONB E, APP2E AD MOY AL.L, URL.INES «0E. SNODE. CONT;TOR IS ESPARSEN.IE 7XO MON MAE NOSH2AOL.DD URL.INES 0Do usr coNoycf DONN UUC AD oE UuY c0es aeOE ECAMONG, [s. cowcso SL, esOE 4AL, o$, «2. uDM? {AN0CANE, SR.NED IM COM3Aw0AON 'TO 9E-COMSOAAEON CON0AON$, POWER TYPE: 120/240V, SINGLE PHASE, 200 AM PS /✓ / ---......__ J- < oA A· «CS s ? S CZ 11MD ML. PANTON {EMS7'MG CONDIT' 'TO E ueea o aaE 4et. r«a u.ES} \ '\ ' <gg® +wwe / ea A s /8. /--oosi asmu nen mou ease© 4. Sy H-FREON4ET TO L.C. PAFOAM AONE Ei.LF,>--- UIIJII' IIIIIIE SE ENS? UENONU)ND COMA.AT' FRO8 17 40evoR or Tove Do Pou.ou sOMG EACAL. CAL.E LAXER 1VO 2MDO EEL I I P" : kroae aw-ue uca er Poro y--4} I I ·, "'~ 0smo ever OAEIS To wt (nP2AN) P -om 1 < {EST7Sr ] t® mwsrow 1 I I I I I } n I I I I I I ,,1/ (3) isms cow DmoN @ 2Np i=vi SCALE: NO 8CALE x > s. <5 R I s --..y as \V gr OPVENT 2N0 PUOrONM I I I ! (F)ycTRicAL. PA 8CAL.E: 1mp « {-0" -- j @ #gg?.Poomow m-······,u·~.-.., 5s ? a if 9>.° 55 , «s «...° s I 8 ¢ ~Ii 6 fuel! ponies, inc. 40oaf Meted ht, it a Alioto, AN Ali4l-SO} o Hert if 1Es1ON}, 00r» uLmY Mew A ggt Poe;, Av aw4 qua o-au ww.GlN 42I.204 verlzon' O001 ti.lM LANE AD tit.00063706¢, MN 488 4et0} reo-oooe PROJECT 201 71666548 LoC. COOE: 44280¢ MIN HILBERT HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN , MN SSS1? SH EET CONTENTS: EL.ECTC/AL SITE PLAN DORA'M BY; NS (ATE: a-2f7 CHECKED HY: Da REV.A 0-46-47 EV. to-02-f? EV.C Ga-22-e REV .D g7-49-48 E-1 GENERAL NOTES A. CIRCLES WITH NUMBERS INSIDE REPRESENT EQUIPMENT NUMBERS. 8EE EQUIPMENT L.IST ON SHEET E£-S . 8. ALL CONDUCTORS SHALL BE TYPE THHN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDO. C. LABEL METERS AND DISCONNECTS PER NEC. VZW ME TRUDA8CONNECT TO BE TOP MOST IN LEFT METER STACK. Po0SED CV=-L.OC T sE£ LOCATED MA0ENT TO 90so 0_·. 2 EXISTING METER/DISCONNECTS ·.. .3CAL E: MONE UNISTRUT KEYED NOTES v 7 V PROVIDE 200A METER ANDO 200A BREAKER DISCONNECT AND LABEL. AS VZW 86RVICE. 2C 2#30 +#MON +40G MOUNT IL.C TO 3 UNIST®UT WHERE 8HON. MAINTAIN NEC EXQLNRED2 CLEARANCE. PROVMDOE AL.L. BRANCH CIRCUITS FOR LIHTING, GFI REXCEPT ACL.EB ANDO COOL.NG UNITS REQUIRED FOR CABINETS. PRCOMDOE RSQLUIRSD NUMBER OF 20A, SINGLE AND TWO POLE BREAKERS FOR CONNECTION TO RECTIFIERS, HVAC UNTT8, ETC. 8EE VZW EQUIPMENT CUT SHEETS FOR REQUIRED CIRCUIT CONNECTIONS. CCONNECT ALARM (CABLING TO TERMINAL BL.OCK IN VZW CABINETS VA ·¢ CONATY. VZMW 200A IL.C © as . - ·, n © EXISTING TRANSFORMER UTI UTY POWER CAM--L.0C GENERA TOR CONNECTOR MOUNTED TO SIDE OF TOWER © VZW CABINETS 0 ONE-LINE DIAGRAM SCALE: NONE y886nu9,, -~oo~ .. ~_ { hv'} A\° «, ® « ¢sat&> Mi 3} ig5 t s x'l ,_ i•'i~ ~ s flt • j # ] of uel l Corio, line 4000 Moote Ahl, il& ii tots, at al-SOS Oto lit+f ps 1GN}, 40rs EL.eY woew ARO. EDEN 9MANE, 0N 844 408ti) 00- w.30801 03 04 verlzon' go00f ,qH A.ANOE CM i.O0Ng2TO, MN 8600 40123 7a -oz PROJECT 20171588548 L.0C. CODOE: 443084 MIN HILBERT HAZEL.TINE BOLULE=VIARD CHANHASSEN, MN 55847 SHEET CONTENTS : EL.ECTIKCAL. ONE-LINE AND EQUIPMENT EL.ATION DRAN BY: AN ATE: go-29-t7 CHECKED BY: DB REV.A O-16-f7 REV. f0-02-f7 REV.C C7-2A-8 REV , D c7-4G-8 E-2 4 "% #ouNnwa: PAMEL - GiA LAlN iio wcii «+«re {i} so (2id" vOtT8 t PASE 3 WIRE 8.8 100A tug w fly > &s LOC ATION VOL.T AMN L R M C C M t L 9O.CY Al LOCATION «c6 ® T E s. I( sue K S E Jars <+aav A a G C C BKR r i a T BR c c :' l 0 4006.l 40 w2v ««€liefs ur ooniai } air) t ii YgcrrgNgp-= SuROE AES®IO? ALA; ·wee. 3 ion» g ala » :t lg, u.A.A gyp l UUTY POOR FAML. . Tran . I la Mr , tAM rt gf 'ilg if pi=Pe 3 #h» io»ggg i6iha is» !tr i a sites, " a ECRANER FALOE"· l ~i I a la t465 UL. PL.E AELEM F tine 4¢ on 4,0f 4 lily owe leg -gf fores M.AAM ism egg ta ta ti , I u.r '4aes 4 % hHh 1200 I i0 ta -· t a0a inets4to l jp w' I its laa ■. einib •. op •, 4-e r tl 2it2 mull {i », ff rs .gtg lirole jg tai. cc f - I.. 4lg fl\il 40 - a ti0 » «ii 2 - tuooa! Caponi, le ow gall. ! inn sr? r , ta otter ht, iit 4 • all ooto, MN 4OM-oOT 0 «200 [ fN o-HEISS rot .ail ai mu I L.. op ii i' a hit - voe.'r-AMi Pean .NE A 'iisii a . t$166 - pEs1ON}, TOT AL.'OL'T - AMPS = 3057% ANS i it 2as LL 0vs L.my' ow Rain g02EN WEE, MM o06 .st. ut4ft,S qua2 oc-au ww.62060M 4g.M NOTES: of lg ver lzon L ... - gpg lggpwg awe ] u tot i4 L.AMOE MD & 00MN2TOM, AN it e2} a-ooue @) "ggeo scow=us PROJECT 0' SECURITY PANEL- EQUIPMENT #5 20171666548 0C. CODE 463804 SCALE: NONE MIN HILBERT HAZELTINE BOULEVARD g% J-- CHANHASSEN, MN 55347 A 2E.AEAI2IL L.lN FOR Su2E AES8TOR AL.ANM, CONNECT SHE ET CONTENTS: TO COM0N ANO MOAMAL.L.Y COL.ED ON EL.EL;TuCAL. 8CHEEAL. EIS AND ENMON AL EL.CAISSE. MORNA LL.Y' CL.SIED LOW VOL. TAO€ WING CONTACTS SELL ESE' CL.OSIED) N MOAMAL DOAGRAMS PoER cOoNrOM. COWACTS ILL. QPEN EQU IPM ENT LIST--ALL ITEMS FU RN ISH ED , INSTALLED AN D CO NNECTED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR F ELEMENTS BLOW OR A.C PONER FALS E 4 MANUF ACTURER ART MO. wwuCT.UREN DeSCRPnoM UHUY POER FAR. ALARM f: }111 @N1S t1,1l DRAM'N BY: Al 1 ~ U11IJ1Y 12 RIR ElCISl1NQ IEDt IIOCICET _, 8gY THE UILI'TY POWER FAR. RELA Y ATE: O-29-f7 2a ME&RATED IN 3-4N-{ PANEL CHECKED> BY: De 3 rr NMI COMNEC7ED 1O EACH PMASE REV.A Of6-{T OF THE COMING POER REV, {0o-02-f7? s eEM .C 0«2-222-% erev. 0 co7-10-48 © ®rs ©) gfggT @Aw cAs uwe pa E -3 fa» ti A% 3% «> GENERAL ELECTRICAL NOTES I SPECIFICATIONS: N e «assaa as' W' 1 t. SUBMITTAL OF BID INDICATES CONTRACTOR IS 12. PROMDE CONS'TRLX;TION MANAGER WTH ONE SET 24. METER SOCKET AMPERES, VOLTAGE, MA4BER OF 31 MRE: n11 h AWARE OF ALL. 308 SITE CONDITIONS AND WORK OF COMPLETE ELECTRICAL. AS IMSTALLED PHASES SHALL BE AS NOTED ON THE DRAMINGS. A. ML 20 AP CRCUITS 1O Af {{Z TMM wNG. MANUFACTURED BY SQUARE D COMPANY OR APPROVED B. ALL 40 AMP CIRCUIT'S TO HAE THHM MARING. ha}- T0 BE PERFORMED (UNDER THIS CONTRACT. DRAWINGS AT THE COMPLETION OF THE JO8, EQUAL. F HOST FACILITY REQUIRES THE NEW SERMCE TO C. ALL, 60 AMP CIRCUITS TO HAE 46 'THHN WRING. & i± 3 f 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL VERIFICATION SHOWING ACTUAL. DIMENSIONS, ROUTINGS, AND BE SUS-METERED FROM THE EXISTING SERMICE, 34 AL DC GROUNDING CONDUCTORS TO EBE TERMINATED 3ff i O8SERVA TON TESTS, AND EXAMINE WORK PRIOR CCUunTS. SLUE-METER SHALL BE OF 'THE 1Ox OR 1G: TYPE. ",,,£,,· s rre new=us roe 1e TO THE ORDERING OF THE ELECTRICAL. EQUIPMENT 15. ALL BROCHURE'S, OPERATING MANUALS, CATALOGS, 24. AN1. MATERIALS SHALL BE U.L. LUSTED. TE SIZE OF WRE. j #a 1 AND THE ACTUAL. CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHOP ORAMINGS, ETC. SHALL. BE TURNED OVER TO 25. CONDUIT: 35. PANEL SCHEDULE SHALL. BE ACCURATELY {IDENTIFIED AND 1 A. SERMCE CONCOLITIS SHALL. BE GRAY SCH.4O PVC PRINTED WTH AN ADHESIVE TYPE LABEL MAKER (KROY, SHALL ISSUE A ReITTEN NOTICE OF ALL. FINDINGS OWNER AT J08 CCOMPLETION. BURIED MIN. 36", EXCEPT THAT SCH.SO SHALL. BE USED BROTHER, OR EQUAL). NOTE: EMBOSSED MARKER SHALL TO HE ARCHITECT LISTING ALL. MALFUNCTIONS, 146. 4UL.CT7-- WMRE CIRCUITS W'TH COMMON NEUTRAL UNDER ROADWAYS AND IN LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO NOT BE USED. f FALL.TY EQUIPMENT ANDO DISCREP ANCIES. CONDUCTOR SHALL. NOT BE ALLOWED. CASU AL WMPACTS. BENDS SHALL BE MADE USING "WIDE 36. USE FLEXIBLE LIQUID 'TTTE NONMETALLIC CONDUIT AND 3. HEIGHTS SHALL BE VERIFIED ITH OWNER PRIOR TO 15. ALL, CONDUCTORS SHALL. BE. COPPER. WRE ·,5.5\ 22.r mas aw FITTGS FOR FINAL CONNECTION TO RECTIFIER CIRCUIT'S STAL.LATON. ALL. MOUNTING HEIGHTS ARE MADE SMALLER THAN {48 TO BE "STRANDED COPPER" CO0£ RIGID CONDUIT SHALL BE LL TO ISOLATE THE CONDUIT GROUND (SEE ALSO NED FROM THE BOTTON OF DEMCES TO THE FINISHED THHN OR THMN CONDUCTORS. EXCEPTION: AWG LABEL, AN. 36" BEL.OW GRADE, ITH "SWEEP" EL.BOMS ARTICLE 2505, HICH SPECIFIES ALL GROUND RINGS, {uell oonio, lg. a flee ft, tit fl0 Foo, TE1.CO WRE AND 412./414 AG WRE USED FOR (1 .2"R.uN.} ENDIN G N PVC TRANSITION FITTINGS. RIGID REBAR AND/OR UFER GROUND, AND GROUND RODS TO not fl iM--aof ti-trttf 4. THESE PLANS ARE. DAAGRAMMA TIC ONLY. FOLL.OW CONDUIT IM CONTACT WTH EARTH SHALL BE 1,/2 BE EFFECTIVEL Y BONDED WWTH "NON--REMER.SING" TYPE - go AS CLOSELY A$ POSSIBLE. A.C. CONTROLS TO BE SOLID COPPER. LAP--WRAPPED MTH HUNTS PROCESS NG. J EXTENDING • g3faros so sur sow c urr o 16. ALL CIRCUIT BREAKERS, FUSES AND ELECTRICAL MN. 12" ABONE GRADE. S. EAOH CONDUCTOR OF EVERY SYSTEM SHALL. BE EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE AN INTERRUPTING RATING B. NTERIOR CONDUITS SHALL BE ELECTRICAL METALLIC EXHALUST FAN WHEN ACTIMATED. pEs 1GIN}A, PERMANENTL Y TAGGED IN EACH PANEL BOARD, NOT LESS THE MAXUAN SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT TUBING HAVMNG U.L. LABEL; FITTINGS SHALL. BE GLAND 38. EXTERIOR GROUNDING SYSTEM FOR METER AND SERM0E PULL.BOK, J--B0x, SMTOH BOK, ETC. IN TO ICH THEY MAY BE SUB.ECTED, AND A RING COMPRES'SIKON TYPE. IHE USE OF EMT SET SCREW BY ELECTRICAL. CONTRACTOR. COMPLIANCE W'TH OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND MNIAU4 OF 10,000 AL.C. FITTNGS NSIDE BUILDING IS ACCEPT ABLE. 32. EN ONE--WAY FOOTAGE FROM 'THE UTIU'TY ors L.LEY Mew su HEALTH ACT (O.SH.A ) C, FLEXIBLE METALLIC CCONMUTT SHALL. HAE LU.L. LISTED TRANSFORMER CCONNECTIONS TO THE SERM CE EDON NE, N 404@ 17. THE ENTIRE ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION SHALL BE LABEL, ANDO MAY BE USED WHERE PERMITTED BY' CODE. DISCONNECT MEANS (LINE TERMI NAL. LLGIS) IS LESS 'THAN gez) 0a0-ea &. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMDE ALL. LABOR, GROUNDED AND BONDED AS REQUIRED BY ALL FHTTNGS SHALL BE AKE" OR "SQUEEZE" TYPE, SEAL t5' AND 'THE UTILITY TRANSFORMER IS 2% IMPEDANCE WWW.0G009MAS.COM MATERIAL.S, INSURANCE, EQUIPMENT, INSTALLATION, APPLICABLE CODES AND DRA MNGS. A SEPARA TE TGHT FLEXABLE CONDA'T. NO SUCH CONDUIT SHALL. OR LONER; USE A FUSED DISCONNECT WWTH RKY FUSES CONSTRUCTION TOOLS, TRANSPORTATION, ETC., FOR GREEN GROUNDOING CONDUCTOR SHALL. BE EXCEED SIX FEET IN LENGTH. LUSE FLEXIBLE METAL ("so D" 0z24«wR9) A COMPLETE AND PROPERLY OPERA'TIME SYSTEM "PGTAILED" AT EACH J--BOX, WITH A SEPARATE CONDOUTT UNLESS EXPOSED TO WEATHER, 'THEN USE UV vertzon' ENERGIZED THROUGHOUT AND AS NDNCATED ON RESISTANT FLEXIBLE NONMET AL.UC LKAUND'TTTE. CONDA.NL. ORAWINGS, AS SPELFIED HEREIN AND/OR AS PGTANL. TO A GREEN GROUNDING SCREW ATTACHED D. ur" DENOTES EMPTY RACEWA Y. TO TE TAPPED " 10-32 HOLE W THE BOK E. "GRC" DENOTES GALVANIZED RIGID CONDUIT. oog UH LANOIE ROM OTHERWISE REQUIRED. ADDITION ALLY, ANOTHER GREEN PIGTAIL. IS TO BE 24. ALL ELECTRICAL EDQUIPMENT SHALL. BE LABEL.ED WWTH O. ONG7ON. MN osg 7. ALL. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE NEW FASTENED TO ALL YOKES OF DEMCES, AND TO PERMANENT ENGRA VED PLASTIC LABELS. ex2} '720-4002 AND IN PERFECT CONDITION HEN INSTALL.ED AND METAL CASES OF LIGHTING FIXTURES. THE USE OF 17. PATCH, REPAIR AND PAINT AMY AREA THAT HAS BEEN SHALL. BE OF THE BEST GRADE AND OF THE SAME GROUNDING CLIPS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. DAMAGED IN THE COURSE OF THE ELECTRICAL. WORK. PROJECT MANUFACTURER THROUGHOUT FOR EACH CL.ASS OR '2s. PENETRATIONS IN FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL. BE FIRE 201 7 1586548 1&. RECEPTACLES SHALL. BE 20 AMPERE, 125 VOLT SECTIONS OF THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE IM FORCE. GROUP OF EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS SHALL. BE AC., SPECFICATON GRADE, WHITE AS REQUIRED 28. DRILLING OR CORING HOLES INTO CONCRETE WALLS. LOG. GODE: 44889f LUSTED AND APPROVED BY UNDERWRITER'S BY THE ARCHITECT OR APPROVED EQUAL. WHETHER FOR FASTENING OR ANCHORING PURPOSES, LABORATORY AND SHALL. BEAR 'THE INSPECTION 19. AL.L SMTCHE'S SHALL, BE SINGLE--POLE, HUBBELL OR PENETRATIONS THROUGH THE FL.DOOR FOR CONDUIT MIN LABEL. "/' WHERE SUBE;T TO SUCH APPROVAL. ##201 OR EQUIVALENT, ITE AS REQUIRED BY' THE RUNS, PE RUNS, ETC., REQUIRES 'THAT 'TENDONS OR HILBERT REINFORCING STEEL. MUST BE SEARCHED FOR BY MATERIAL.S SHALL MEET ITH APPROMAL. OF THE ARCHITECT . APPROPRIATE. METHODS AND EQUIPMENT (X--RAY OR OIMSON OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND ALL, 20. PLASTIC PLATES FOR ALL. SWTCHES, RELEPTA(CLES, owes g,22,4,5.gg ·anwnas use eu GOVERNING BODIES HAMNG J.RISDACTON. TELEPHONE AND BLANKED OUTLETS, SHALL. HAVE TENDONS OR MUST MOT BE DRILLED, CUT MATERIALS SHALL. BE MANUFACTURED IN ENGRAVED LETIERIN G WHERE INDICATED ON "THE OR DAMAGED UNDER ANY CRCAISTANCES. HAZELTINE BOUL.EMARD ACCORDANCE ITH APPLICABLE. STANDARDS DRAMINGS. WEATHERPROOF RECEPTACLES SHALL 30. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, CONDUCT CONTINUITY, CHANHASSEN, MN 55347 ESTABLISHED BY ANSI, NEMA AND NBFL. HAVE RACO 4800, 1/2° RAISED WORK COMERS. SHORT CRCUTT, AND FALL POTENTIAL GROUNDING TESTS FOR APPROVAL. SUBMIT TEST REPORTS TO PROJECT &. CONTRACTOR SHALL CARRY OUT HIS WORK IN 21. WRE AND CABLE CONDUCTORS SHALL. BE COPPER MANAGER. CLEAN PREMISE'S OF ALL DEBRIS RESUL.TING SHEET CONTENTS: ACCORDANCE ITH ALL. GOVERNING STATE, COUNTY 4412 AWG MNAM, NO BX OR RONEX CABLE IS FROM WORK AND LEAME ORK N A COMPLETE AND LS;TRIAL AND LOCAL. CODES AND O.S.H.A. PERMITTED UNLESS SPECIFICALL Y NOTED OTHERWISE (UNDOAMAGED CONDITION. GENERAL. MCOTES 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL. SECURE ALL. NECESSARY ON DRAWINGS, 31. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ITH UTILITY COPAN'Y FOR eUL.DING PERI7S. 22. NOT USED . CONNECTION OF BOTH TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT POER TO 'HE SITE. 'THE TEMPORARY POER AND ALL 1G. COuPLETE JO8 SHALL. BE GUARANTEED FOR A HOOKUP COSTS TO BE PAID BY CONTRACTOR. PERIOD OF ONE (t) YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF JO 32. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMDOE LABOR AND MATERIALS AS DRAM EBY: A ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER. ANY WORK, MATERIAL NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE INSTALLA TION OF ANY DATE: O0-2-17 OR EQUPUENT FOUND TO BE FALUA.TY DURING THAT TOMER LIGHTING SYSTEM DESCREED IN 'THE RFQ CHECKED> Y: D8 PERIOD SHALL BE CORRECTED AT ONCE, UPON REN.A 00-6-f7 teNV. { O-02-f7 RI TEN NOTIFICATION, AT THE EXPENSE OF THE Re.C Ga-2-t8 CONTRACTOR RgV . D 07-19-46 11, ALL. CONDUIT ONLY (C.O.} SHALL. HAME A PULL. IRE OR ROPE. E-4 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES ¢, CONSTRUCT ION PROCEDURE: 10. SHOP DRAWINGS: tll H a. THE STRUCTURE SHALL B5 ADEQUATELY BRACED AND SHORED DURING ERECTION a. SHOP DRAWINGS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW , BUL.NG CODES USED FOR DO£SIGN: AGANST WIND AND ERECTION LOADS. STRUCTURAL MEMBERS ARE DESIGNED FOR IN PRIOR TO FABRICATION, •• a. MINNESOTA BALDING CODE, 2015 EDITION. (IBC 2012) PLACE LOADS. b. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A REGISTERED t, TA 222-G (2005) W/ ADDENDUM 1 {20073 AND ADDENDUM 2 (20093 b. COMPLY WITH ALL APPLIA.E CITY, COUNTY. STAT£ ANDO FEDERAL LAWS, INCLL/DOING PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF THE PROJECT, AND INCLUDE COMPLETE THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT {OSHA} AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED DETAILS, SCHEDULES, PROCEDURES AND {AAGRALAS FOR FABRICATKON AND ASSEMBLY H E R Z O 6 2 DESIGN CRITERIA: PURSUANT THERETO, OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. e, WIND LOAD CRITERIA: c, THE CONTRACT STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE G FABRICATORS SHALI DRAW 'THEIR OWN ERECTION PLANS. COPYING TH& STRUCTURAL BASIC WIND SEED V st16 mph (UL.TUATE) FINISHED STRLJCTURE. LLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THEY DO NOT IN(DNCATE THE MEANS PLANS AND USING THEA AS ERECTION DRAWINGS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. ENGINEERING LLG WIN ON ICE SPEED V e 50 MPH OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE ALL MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT •- PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SHOP DRAWINGS AND $6 trt frd Street, Sek@» ti0 WIND LOAD APO?TANCE FACTOR t= $.0 THE STRUCTURE, WORKMEN OR OTHER PE?SONS DURING CONSTRUCTION. SUCH MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAMP AND SK3N THE iileaego)ls, l G4if WIND LOAD EXPOSURE C MEASURES SHALL INCLIDE. BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, BRACING, SHORING FOR DRAWINGS AS EVIDENCE THAT HE HAS REVIEVED THEM. (6 i2] 44¢-124 WIND TOPOGRAPHIC FACTOR Kat = 1.0 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, SHORING FOR THE LIL.DG, SHORING FOR EARTH BANKS, p, SHOP ORAWINGS SMALL BE FURN[SHED FOR ALL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. b, ICE LOAD CRITERIA: FORMS, SCAFFOLDING, PLANKING. SAFETY NETS, SUPPORT AND BRACING FOR CRANES l TURN AROUNO 'T'MAE FOR SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE TWO WEEKS FROM DATE RECEIVED DESIGN ICE THICKNESS d =0.76 NCHES ANDO GIN POLES, ETC. IN THE ENGINEER'S OFFICE. •- ENGAGE PROPERLY QUAUFIED PERSONS TO DETERMINE WHERE AND> HOW TEMPORARY 3 DO£sGM STRESSES: PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES SHALL BE USED AND INSPECT SAME IN THE FIELD. 11. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS; Registration Informntlon : a. STRUCTURAL STEEL OBSERVATON VISITS TO THE SITE 8Y ENGNEER'S FIELD REPRESENTATIVE SFALL NOT t hereby erttfy that thlr plan, t, WME FLANGE SHAPES Fy =5084 A$'7M AO02 CL UDE INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE ITEMS. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH I8C CHAPTER T?. THE SPECIAL pee/tioatior or report or prepared W, ALL OTHER SHAPES Fy =35K54 AS$TM A38 0. SUPERVISE AND DRECT THE WORK SO AS TO MAINTAIN SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL INSPECTOR SHALL BE EMPLOYED BY THE OWNER, SHALL, BE THOROUGHLY KNOWLEDGEABLE F by me or under my direct upervlslan and thot } am a duly b. STRUCTURAL TUBING fy "46K$4 AST AS00 GR. B CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES. AS A IBC SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL DEMONSTRATE COMPETENCE TO THE Lined Engineer, under the lows c, STANDARD STEEL PIPE Fy =35KSI AS'TM A63 GR. B PART OF THIS RESPONSIBILITY, RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A LICENSED STRUCTURAL SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. IBC 1704}. THE CONTRA CTOR SHALL CONTACT THE gf he Stote of Minryict d, PLATES Fy =36 K$1 A$TM A36 ENGINEER TO DESIGN AND SUPERVISE ANY SCAFFOLDING FOR WORKMEN, AND ALL SPECIAL. MSPECTOR DURING 4PPROPRATE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION SO THAT INSPECTIONS .@ @. SOTS SHORING OF FORMS AND ELEMENTS OF THE CONSTRLJCTON, CAN BE MADE IN A TIMELY MANER. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL SUBMIT WRITTEN 4. AM2DNA. AND -GREATER Fu =$20K3/ AS'TM A325 IISPECT1OM REPORTS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORDS OFFICE, WITHIN 3 WORKING DAYS OF EACH L. 1M2DIA. U-BOLT8 A19387, A449 OR SA£ J429 GR. 6 7. MISC EL LANEOUS: ISP£CTION. ANY PROBLEMS SHOULD BE BROLSIT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE Nome: BR'YANI. L.©ENR ii., S/8 DNA. U-BOLT8 AN9SB7, A449 OR SAE J428 GR. 8 . PLACEMENT OF ANCHOR OLT, PIPE SLEEVES, PADS AND OPENINGS FOR EQUIPMENT CONTRAC TOR. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL REQUIRE SPECIAL, INSPECTION: Date @/2n/8 Rog Na:.@oe I. ANCHOR BOLTS fy =3$KS4 A$TM F1&54 INO SHALL BE COOROINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE OTHER g WELD ELECTRODE Fu ='70 KS% SUBCONTR ACTORS, ®. STEEL i. SPECIAL IISPECTONS MAY MOT BE REQUIRED FOR WORK DONE I AN 4, STRUCTURAL STEEL: 8, COORDINATION WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: APPROVED FABRICATING SHOP. THE STEEL FABRICATOR MUST BE , FABRICATION E £ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS ARE TO BE {N .. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERY ALL DIMENSIONS ANO ELEVATIONS WITH THE REGISTERED AND APPROVED BY THE BULDNG OFFICIAL TO PERFORM THE ACCORANCE WITH A.4.8.¢. COOE OF STANDARO PRAC'TCE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. WHERE MSCREPANCIES OCCUR, IT [8 THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK WITHOUT SPE GL, INSPECTIONS. SPECIAL MISPECTIOM FOR DESIGN}, b, ALL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE BOLTED OR WELDED. EACH CONNECTION SHALL BE RESPONSILITY TO MOTY THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRU CTION. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE QUALITY ADEQUATE TC SUPPORT ONE HALF THE TOTAL UNIFORM LOAD CAPACITY OF 'THE BEAM, ASSURANCE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF ASC 280 (lBC 1705.2.1). UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL. HAVE A 9, NEW WORK IN CON.UNCTION WITH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION; ii. HGH STRENGTH BOLTING: CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS, , THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY, BY FIELD CHECK, ALL SIZES, DIMENSIONS, SLIP.CRITICAL CONNECTIONS, PERIODIC INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR 90ra wugY yVgw eD. C. ALL WELDING SHALL BE BY QUALIF IED WELDERS ANDO SHALL CONFO RM TO THE ELEVATIONS. LOCATIONS, ETC . OF ELEMENTS OF THE EXISTING CONS TRUCTION WHICH BEARING-TY PE CONNECTIONS, ape wunez, IN ANO4 STANDARDS OF 'THE AMERICAN WELD ING BO£TY, 01.1-8TRUCTURA L WELDING CODE - ARE RELATIVE TO THE NEW CONS TRUCTION. ii. FIELD WELDING: CONTINLKLIS INSPECTIONS ARE REQUREO FOR COMPLETE gag ooo-a STEEL. WELDS MG OF GAL VANIZED PARTS IS NOT PERMIT TED. b. ALL DIMENS IONS INVO LVING MEW WORK TYWG INTO OR GOVERNED BY EXISTING AND PARTIAL PENETR ATION GROOVE WELD S, M(ULT}- PASS FILLET WELDS AND wwww.2NQM EI.COM '· ELECTRODES FOR ALL FIELD AND SHOP WEL DING SHALL CONFORM 'TO MATCHING CONSTR UCTIO N SHALL. BE FIELD CHECKED BY THE CONTRA CTOR AND FURNISHED TO SWGLE-PASS FILLET WELDS GREATER THA N 6I6". PERIODIC INSPECTIONS FLL.ER METAL REQUIREM ENTS OF AWS D1,1. THE SUBCO NTRA CTOR PRIOR TO FABRKATON OF ANY WORK. 'THE VERIFIED ARE REGLI®ED FOR FLOOR ANDO ROOF DEC K WELDS AND SINGLE-PASS FIL.LET e. FELD CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE BOL TED. LUSE " (MAM. HGM STR ENGTH BOLTS AND MENSIONS SHALL, APPEA R AMD BE NOTED AS SLUCH ON THE FIRST SHOP DRAWING WELDS SALLER 'THAN OR EQLAL TO 5/16. CORRECT WELD F LL.ER MATERIAL NUTS {A825) UNL,E SS SHOWN OTHE RWIS E ON PL.ANS, SUBITTE O. SHALL B£ VERIFIED IN AL.L CASES. r. CUTS, HOLES {OPENINGS), ETC. REQUIRED W STRUCTURAL. STEEL MEMBERS FOR THE c THE ENGINEER HAS MADE ASSUMPTIONS C{CERNING THE SOUNDNESS OF THE iv. STEEL ERECTION: PERIODIC MSPECTIONS SHALL BE MAOE TC VER-Y WORK OF OT+ER TRADES SMALL NOT BE ALLOWED, EXCEPT BY WRITTEN PERMISSION EXISTING BUILDINGS ANDO THESE ASSUMPTION S ARE THAT THIS BUIL(ANG WAS COMPLIAA CE WITH THE DESIGN DRAWINGS, verizon' FROM THE ENOINEER. DESIGNED AND CON STR UCTED IN CONF ORM ITY WITH GOO D DESI GN AND v. MATERIALS: THE STEEL MAN UFACTURERS CERT#PIED ML,L TEST REPORTS 9 ALL EXTERIOR STRUCTURAL STEEL, MISCELLANEOUS METALS, BAR GRATG ANO CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE EXTRAORDINARY SHALL. BE SUBMITTED0 TO THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OR TO THE ENGINEER OF HARDWARE SHALL BE HOT-DMPPED GAL VANIZED IN CONFORMANCE WITH AS'TM A1S3 AND PRECAUTIONS CONCERNING PRESERVATION OF THE BAUL.DING DJRING DEMO,ITON AND RECORD. a0of .us AE NOD ASTM A123, NEW CONSTRUCTION WOR K FURTH ER, HE SHALL. AGREE TO ASBLUM E ALL h, WELDING OF GALVANIZE D MATER IALS IS NOT ALLOWED . REMOVE GALVANIZING BEFORE RESPONS IBILITY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THIS PROPERTY . b. EPO XY ANCHORS: O,CO0MN2TON, AMIN 6400 4eta va 40g FELD WEL.DING. WEL.DOS SHALL B£ SPRAYED WITH ZINC RICH PAINT. ,. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY O# ANY • CONT INUOUS SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PRO VIOE D DLURING 4, EXISTING STEEL FRAMING TO BE WELDED TO, SMALL HAVE PANT, RUST , OIL, ANDO OTHER DISCREPANCIES BETWEE N CONSTRUCTION DOC UMENTS AND ACTU AL. FIELD INST ALLATION F ALL EPOXY ANCHORS AND SLEEVE ANCHOR S 'TO ENSURE CONTAMINAN"S REMOVED TO BASE MATERIAL WTH IN 2 OF WELDED AREA, /A CONDITIONS. PROPER ISTALLATION PROCEDUR ES, EMBEDMENT DEPTH S, ETC , CUTTI NG OF EXISTING STRUCTURAL. STEEL IS PROHIBITED WITH OUT APPROVAL FROM PROJECT s. DRILL ED ANCHOR S: THE ENGINEER, 2017 1 668548 9, ALL EXPANSICN BOLTS SHALL BE HILT1 WI K-BOLTS", SIMPSON WEDG E-ALL' OR ¢. THE GENERAL CONTR ACTO R IS TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL PENETRA TIONS LOC. CODE: 443894 RAMS ET/REDHEAD TRUBOLT", LNLES S NOTED OTHERWI SE ON THE DRAWINGS , THROUGH THE TOWE R CCLUMN 8MELL PRIOR TO DORM.LING THE CABLE PENETRA TIONS b, ADHESIVE ANCHORAGE FOR DRILLED REBAR DOWEL.S SHALL BE HLTI HIT-HY 200 WITH THE OWNER'S 39 PRRTY INSPECTOR, ADHESIVE" OR SMPSON EPOXY -TIE OR SI P&SO Y "ACRY LIC.TIE", UNLESS MOTED MIN OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS , HILBERT HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN $631? SHEET CONTENTS: ONEAL. STICE7UAL. NOTES STRUCTURAL. 1TStre DAMN BY; M8 · ATE: 08.81.47 CHECKED BY: MW aL Rev. A OaA Y Rey. f8 fO021 7 REV. C c2rare Rev .DO OTerte so EeTNG ACB& TUeE }HF-, aero s 'Bara TwK Sow BOTTOM OF ATeR <[ate»,,-2 9 f 1 tll! th «re«rem , 4O64 .3 AM3t./AO.0 AGL ] ggg;®®vs or=Ausuos Asa EX TiGL WATCH PROPOSED ANTENNAS ANDO 8HROOD (5) \ Ea sTI NG CONCRETE FLOOR- , EXISTING \ HOIST BEAM \ s, N ',' lH •• H E R Z 0 G ENGINEERING LL© $6 fort 1n4 $tut, eta ta6 eye]k, G St (art) 4€- eg lutton Iormnotion ! I hereby rtify hat this plan, poiioation or report wow prop y me ar under mmy dire! aper@lon and that ! or a duly Livened ngireer, under the low f the Stab gf wet a. • Ry Mare g8YANT, LOEHR Dote92/@10/04.Rog. Ma:mow pEs1ON} 96ra weY vew MM PAE, MN 4pi gezg oo-a www.De E.OM ,.. verizon' to0ot 1Ali4 t.AMIE AD 0.00N2704, MM 04a eta} rao -oog2 PROJECT 201 7 1666548 Lo¢. CODE: 443801 MIN HILBERT ow= e wane 1owe! g 1042.8° AMSLA-O AGL, II II II II EXISTING UTILllY EQUIPMENT (BY OTHERS} ~OUTH ELEVATION I SCALE: t" = 30-0° (P \EQUIPMENT ROOM PLAN yea I SCALE: 3/18° = 4-0 NOTES: 1. EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO BE INSTALLED ON VZW FURNISHED BASE BY CABINET MANUFACTURER. SECURE TO SLAB W/ (4) (GALV.) 5/8° Z HILT! HLC SLEEVE ANCHORS (EMBED = 2), HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 5531? SHEET CONTENTS: e2uUPMENT ROOM PLAN -~- 0&.31.f7 CHECKED» BY: ?> MW. BL 0an/t? REV. B {Kart 7 RV.C c22/\. REV.D gr ere S1 s, x\ ', ', s s s s , , s , s , s s, s A s COAX CAB LE AND , CONDUIT LINES, /% REF . DETAIL 483 \x {X FOR MOUNT ING \ { INFORMATION, > 1 \ REF.ARCH FOR <.}-3 EXACT LOCATIONS x, \{x, > \ 1\X } \ s ',,:, ... s s X s N A S s, s s 'Y} '\ « 2la ai %esif NO TES: 1. FIELD VERI FY ALL EXI ST. CON DITIONS . 2. ALL ATTACHMENT S TO PAINTED SURFACE S ARE TO INCLU DE THE PLACE MENT OF NEOP REN E STRI PS BETWEEN HARDW ARE AND POINTS OF CONTACT TO REDU CE/EL IMINATE DAMAGE TO THE PAINTE D SURFACE. METAL SHIMS ARE REQU IRED IN SITUATIONS WH ERE TIGHTEN ING A CLAMP MAY CALUISE THE NEOPRENE TO TEAR CAUS ING METAL TO METAL CONTACT. WHERE POSS IBLE , EXPOSED NEOPREN E SHOULD BE WRAPPED WITH WHITE TAPE. FASTEN ING SEQUENCE SHOULD INCLU DE NYLON WASH ERS BETWEEN THE PAINTED SURFACE AND THE GALVANIZED WASH E. 3. PROPOSE D ANTEN NAS, MOU NTING PIPES , ASSOC IATED BRACKETS AND MOU NTS /A INSTALLED ON THE EXTER IOR OF THE WATER TOWER SHAU. BE SHOP PAINTE D TO ZS MATCH TH E COL OR OF THE WATER TOWER (VE R IFY COLOR}. 4. PROPOSE D MOUNT IN G PIPES ARE TO HAVE WELDED END CAPS . 5. ALL EXPOSED JUMPERS AND CAB LES ARE TO BE PAINTE D. REFE RENCE ARCHITECTURAL. 6. ALL MOUNT ING HARDW ARE IS TO BE GALVANIZED ANDOR PROVI DED IN A NON-CORROD ING MATER IAL. 7. DRILLING HOLES IN EXIST ING RAILING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. 8. ALL ABAN DONED ANTEN NAS, COAXIAL. CAB LE AND DETACHABLE EQU IPMENT THAT IS NO LONGE R USED ARE TO BE REMOVED DURING THE FINAL MIGRATION. 9..VERI ZON WILLBE RESPON SIBLE FOR ANY AREAS OF THE THE WATER TOWER DAMAGED FROM THE ASSOC IATED STU D WELDS , HAN DRAI L. MOD IFICATIONS AND INSTALLATIONS. DAMAGE D AREAS ARE TO BE REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY REQUIREM ENTS , AS APPLI CABLE TO THE NECESSARY REPAIR AND IN A TIMEFRAME ACCEPT ABLE TO THE CITY . 10. ALL EQUIPMENT IS TO BE IDENTIFIED BY THE TENANT . + ANTENNA MOUNTING PLAN s2 SCALE:3/16= 4!-0" l H •• H E R Z D G ENGINEERING LL© 440 fort 3n! $tuoet, Se]ta ttl iloepeils, M fl (82) 44¢-t24 fog iotratlon Information ; t hereby erttfy that this plan, p-ooficoo ion er ropor'f nos prpor by mne oar under my direct uprvlgln gr$ thgt I gar duly Loaned £ginet, urkr the le af the State of Minreoto ..5ey Mere {B8YA0N'I L2EHR pets®/4Rg Mo:# - DESIGN} 490rJ L.LugY Vgw n. 3a0A2M a@al, MM 5l tea 9o-tao WW .DES4NA EI .2llM verlzon' toot .AH L.IE RMD • 2QOM, MN qg«a 49ag 7a 4o2 PROJECT 201 71 606648 LOC. CODE: 4«43891 MIN HILB ERT HAZEL.TINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 5531 7 SHEET CONTENTS : ANTENNA MOUNT PL.AN us Hecp sY: MW, aL REV. A oars.A ? REV. 9 o0art¥ ey.g REV. D same, oner@ S2 PROPOSED (2) ANTENNAS MOU NTED TO GAL V. STE EL PIPE(TYP .) g % f2 , %, 's x \ x A s x ' ' ' ' K s S \ ' ' \; (S)Sc7oR z PA I SCALE: 14° = 4-0 PROPOSED (1) DIST. BOX (REF. ARCH.) 7 WELDED STEEL Zs ••. = ..1 END CAPS TOP AND BOTT . (SEE ARCH .) 2 SECTOR 'Y' PLAN ss SCALE;14°= 1!-0° $ g 8 $ ? # IN GENERAL , WH ERE ANGLE ALP IE&5, CZ AMPS, OR ANY OTH ER AREAS OF WH ICH THE RE IS METAL. TO METAL. CONTACT, PROVIDE A NEOPREN E WITH A METAL SHIM BETWE EN THE PART AND THE BASE MATERIAL. TO PREVENT EXCESS DAMAGE TO THE COATING AND PROVIDE A MOISTURE BARRI ER IN THE EVENT OF COATING DAMAG E. ADD NEOPRENE AN D WH ITE TAPE AT ALL CLAMPED PIPE ATTACHMENTS. ·° PROPOSED GAL V . STEEL. Z' BRACKET (TYP .) SEE DETAIL 2/S4 EXIST. WALL INTERI OR SEE ARCH. FOR I CON DUIT/CABL E LOCATIONS AN D OR IENTATIONS PROPOSED 1 58x1 -6° ± 1.2 GAUGE GALV. UNISTRUT @ 4-0° 0.C. WI (2) 3n8 Z THREADED RODS , DRI LL AN D EPOXY HILT) HY 200 (EMBED = 4") INTER IOR II H •• H E R Z O G ENGINEERING LIS 3# leri tri ttret, felt» fl0 liege\ls, RE f4ii (t2 444-1244 og le'rtlan hormotion : t hereby cerithy that this ploan, opcifig ion or' report ow prpoar by 0 or oder my drgt pervislan and that I om o duly Lioewd Engineer, under {the low af the Stobi of Miriot&, .3 wore: BRYAN'I LA£21B bots: ER/0V14.Rog. Ma.: «00 DESIGN} om0ra WM.LY Mew A DEM 9PRE, 80M Oii gez oo 2lo ww.DAMON EI.DM verizon' too0f .AM L.ANOE AMD t.OOlNG'TON, tN ii+a ea} aq 402 PROJECT 2017 1568548 LOC. CODE: 443891 PROPOSEO WALL MOUNTING BRACKET SYS TEM (SEE DETAIL 2/84 ) MIN HILBERT HAZELTINE BOULEVARD CHAN HASSEN MN 553 47 SHEET CONTENTS : ug O&.84.47 CHECKED BY: REV.A W BL ls/I? REV. B {O02r17 @ HE:PS,2 "vw /1A (@ CABLE MOUNTING DETAIL (@ \EQUIPMENT MOUNTING DETAIL REV.C CU2Or8 REN.DO Crti&re S3 Zs\ w«ea.sos EN D CAP TOP BOTT.(SEE PROPOSED RRU : /A INTERI OR INCL UDE PLASTIC WASHERS ON AU. BOLTED ATTACHM ENTS 1 EQUIPMENT MOUNTING DETAIL s4 SCALE ; 1/4"= 1-0° /A EXIST. 10° CONG . WALL (FIELD VERI FY} REF . 11S4 FORAU. OTHER EQUIPMENT ATTACHM ENTS PL. 1/2x8 12x-9° WI 6/8 Z THRU-BOL TS ~8"tiltE3½" 8" 1½· ¢ · t& s}¢ • • IN GENERAL, WH ERE ANG LE ADAPTERS, CLAMPS, OR ANY OTHER AREAS OF WH ICH TH ERE IS METAL TO METAL. CONTACT , PROV IDE A NEOPREN E WITH A METAL SH IM BETWEEN TH E PART AN D TH E BASE MATER IAL TO PREVENT EXCESS DAMAG E TO TH E COATING AN D PROVIDE A MOISTURE BARRIER IN THE EVENT OF COATI NG DAMAGE. ADD NE OPREN E AN D WH ITE TAPE AT ALL. CLAMPED PIPE ATTACH M ENTS . 2 142 2 sSCHED. 40 P IPEx1 0-0" WELD ED STEEL END CAPS TOP AND BOTT. (SEE ARCH.) » «lf 4) 11/16° HOLES A-A CENTERED /A oNBEAM /G AU. EXTERI OR EQUIPMENT TO BE PAINTE D. REF . ARCHITECTURAL we8x2/4Ax-8° (GAGE 4") /A /A INCLUDE PLASTIC WASHERS ON ALL BOLTED ATTACH MENTS EXIST. WALL PROPOSED CABLE SHROU D (REF. ARCH.} 2 1/2 SCH ED. 40 PIPES INTERI OR ~ @TYPICAL Z-BRACKET DETAIL '8° ks por ·% INTERJOR PIPE PENETRATIONS (REF. ARCH.) /A PENETRATION INSTALLATION PROCEDURE NOTES: X-RAY AT EACH PENETRATION LOCATION PRI OR TO CORE-DRILLING FOR PENETRATIONS TO AVOID CUTTING EXISTING REBAR. ALL PENETRA TIONS NEED TO BE BLOWN CLEAR OF DEBRIS, INSPE CTE D AND APPROVED BY THE CITY'S THIRD PARTY INSPECT OR. REF. ARCH. FOR PENETRATION PIPE AND BOOT PAINT AND ALL OTH ER INFORMATION. I SCALE: 1/4° = 4-0 s ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL s4 SCALE: 14"= 1-0° till H •• H E R Z 0 G ENGINEERING LLt $0 fort 3rd Stroet, telte ti@ lion@pell4, BE 4f1 {Oz) e-It [glutrotion information : I hereby certffy that this pier, opqcifg tior or report wow prpgrad by me or under my gdirggt mupervllgn art that I am o duty LJooreed 'Engineer, under the lowe gt the $tote of inrota .. Nora: BRYANT LEAR pet: 0g/9/6 g Na.:084, pss1GNp}, 908 L.eY Eew ADO. Doll€ aE, AN Ole 423 go& -«aoe w.De9ZN AEIP.COM verizon' foot UH L.ANOE AO 0.2004w27ON, MN 0430 49tag rag 4o2 PROJ ECT 20171 506548 LoC . CODE: 443891 MIN HILBERT HAZEL.TINE BOULEVARD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 SHEET CONTENTS : DETiL.8 447SST8 8 DATE: 0&.31.47 CHECKED NY': MM, BL Be.A EV. B OngutY {02f 7 Bev.g REV. D C2A 8 as S4 I SITE SURVEY t49 ;, , s { • , @ / : fl fl s # ;> . I~- ..... ; -> s» 4 53 I 1i l I I /-- s \ / N •s w Y < { 9 ,v { v s% /s o c\\: % ? &.h// z # -. 2 # , y s S . ·gs '<., iy p } f f r r f fi s & f p' f -•~>-,--.,- / /' ~tNo.04545 l/ /1 -car we t { Grund Elevations 1042.3 NA®8 $, f t st et rest Eta&eve 172.1 Ava s 1 f 'fa of 'Tank Elevation== 12107.3 MAVDOEB d / HE#:ES' EE I tong/tutz a.J' .34' 54,46° NADAS aEE DETAR. -"},4we 1o e ] /j ·®·· e san s ' /Mu 1 V I Z «, {--+ cw® ;A # P w 1/ LEGEND PO= 280033000 IN. CHOOL. OTICT 2e - Point of Beginning of centerline of 1Q° ewlle ut#ta Right of Way A/L &rlvg feta it ef Beg/aning Of wtiee of 15' wide w Right af Way .9=p, .5g MYDRANWT ]" WATER V AL VE ·a» ELE C POLE tt). TELE PEDESTAL ® TELE HANDHOLE TEE DECIDUOUS 4 TEE CONFER o GUARD POST -{ ELEC METER I CA TCH BASI N 6 S TORM MAN HOLE (@) SA(ARY MAN HOLE -oc GUY ANCHOR ftJT =» BUI L.DI NG WALL HA TCH /XK'KY X KY e al uA [..% 5] coca=Te su +Ac e go ? A i[{ 3#%s .} r{Eg { woo ;Bt u , { < 10.) 1 alde Wiater an Easem en t per 1 • Book 1.2$ Per 25 - .... _ _._,_ "----- --------- Way • w8730'00w 3w.20 < tf ass / et wy <] < _lt ··-»--? • i ' LEASE AREA SEC TON LINE CL ARTER SEC TON LINE SI XTEE NTH SE CTI ON LINE BOUND ARY LINE LOT LINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE EASE ME NT LIN E CON TR OLLED ACCE SS CHANIN LINK FENCE W/ATERMAI N UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRI C UNDERGROUND FIBER STOR M SEWE R SANI TARY SEWE R EDGE OF WOODS f, [/° @ SCALE (N PE!ET) Olp«a 'h # 'pro ii lo 309 «pl I 4q cu } cAwit Ou®Yr Qg0po hp 9 tgM op poog fl " 2«Oro0 A s cow cow aw SURVE YOR NOTE S: ,) tjtlf)thee are per oboorvwd «widens onf fror markings {er GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Locate Reqvewt Tielaet Ma, 171.12.30, dated May '11, 201.7. Aho per Honea Prlverte Locoing Series, -7 ferc. s ·14•.l\-1 ··i"'- I._,~ .,. I ' 'a!n -+1 I . '"' , , ] w· ! 4e- - -~- -.,,,_,_:; I e yo umm e o f ,,,n, 4,,, I• -L~~~, ~ A } <E; j s' aw• /ass± , ..,=],=,,, , "' . . I 'ea- [ \_ EXIS TI NG I I WATERTOWER < !/+ r A I SITE I A. ] e la 1 bJi 00' l __,." .. .'./ we @wG} z .. N~ __ ., .. - ',, - ........ , "· ....... ·- ...... -r • ass - s fiacaeta=a===a af10"with ,~,, ...... !.. ec:41.1!( .. l'ft'T) " ¥ or s . :g l e ' . . .... , , : '--....:::1.----,:;--- {!ls . ·«wad ",' 4 } { { ~ \/\,\ 'w ' '- • ""'"""'"'s- \ / ',! .. , 1' I : ' [ g. a t rwwy {} K 4 , 4 4 \ I r o'-._ ( r ·, I ' ' # 3' · !! \ ! h 3 A ;, - a ' } s f ' mn v# is '\ { 3\' A 4 ' i-5 { .54 v p • + a L}.} t } { ] err '}' i ! ,; BottomolTankElavatlG'\-1 ~: '\ / ' y Top of fork Elevates 1207.3 MAD&8 i s , { r } , : 1 .... ,.,.,.....,,.....,_ ,,ou ••- : ,, ,,~ ,-.. 1 , ,} {9 Tot t Appurten an ce £€vtzig.t NAD8s a { y l _ Vs f,, s l r +1 Latitudes M4PSS 07.8s" NAgS b,s +N, / %, ty { ~, \ '~ ~gltu~ "9,S" 34.' M-46° NA6J., '6' f"' j .. ,£~ 4-,;¼,, ... ,. ........... ~ 1\. \ :--..\ ~ \ ~ g ;, 11' ,1 ;'"' ~<.... --.J ,_ , .,, 3- s s "} Aay , ,:;.• 'I:--. -~ ·,,._ ~ :1 / ,/' ii'-.. ~ ...... - • ,: 'I F'BJ < -+ K \ ass #f > s% «C7lg '-+! , > 's • . \ 1{kt 5, arwswsm; 4 l/ ·r -8 a5 T-- @ ! ~.: R N G 2 3 w ·] ,, p >t ~!I 0, le ~ !i Rs >y - South ire of the / Sw 1/4 of the Nw 1/4 4228.$1- --5871220'E 5305,61--- DEs1GNh SITE NAME: MIN HILBERT I 4 ER E.8¥ CER T#'Y 7A 7 '1e 0CLUNE AN'T WA I I I I I I I =-=:.~~~=-'SIJ~IIION NE.R THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, l-l---+-------------+--+-1 1--1 - - .. Carver County, MN stst AA.±tall a.. IELD WORK : 5/1847 CHE CKE DBY: SM DRAWN 'BY: .MB DATE:2/10/10 Luc&NsE 4 4902 1 #gt.L. $CAL} Ou ti44. t@Alf O# ti 0494A22 '79 .000 #A] wost±r swmTH worts ~ Endrt es1nt I Architectu re I Slnefl nt I En \llf onm erul SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS EXHIBIT "D" TENANT'S REQUIRED INSURA NCE a. Worker's Compensation. The Tenant must maintain! Workers' Compensation insurance in compliance with all applicable statutes, rules and regulations. The policy shall also provide Employer's Liability coverage with limits of $500,000 Bodily Injury each accident, $500,000 Bodily injury by disease, policy limit, and $500,000 Bodily Injury by disease, each employee. b. General Liability. The Tenant must maintain commercial general liability coverage with a limit of $5;000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage and $5,000,000 general aggregate including personal and advertising injury, Premises/Operation, broad form contractual liability, independent contractors, and products/completed operations. Tenant will maintain Completed Operations coverage for one (1) year after the construction of Tenant's Communication Facility is completed. c. Automobile Liability. The Tenant must carry commercial Automobile Liability coverage with a combined single limit of $5,000,000 each accident for bodily injury and property damage covering all owned, non-owned and hired automobiles. d. Tenant Property Insurance. The Tenant must keep in force for the duration of the Lease a policy covering damages to its property at the Leased Premises. The amount of coverage shall be for the full replacement cost value and be sufficient to replace the damaged property, loss of use and comply with any ordinance or law requirements. e. Excess/Umbrella Liability. Tenant shall also maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with a limit of$1,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate which provides coverage in excess of the commercial general liability, commercial automobile liability and employer's liability insurance maintained by Tenant under this Lease. f. Additional Insured - Certificate of Insurance. The Tenant shall provide, prior to the start of construction of the Communication Facility, evidence of the required insurance in the form of a Certificate of Insurance issued by a company (rated A- or better), licensed, authorized or permitted to do business in the State of Minnesota, which includes all coverages required in this Paragraph. Tenant will include the Landlord and the City as an Additional Insured as their interest may appear under this Agreement on the General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability Policies. Upon receipt of notice from its insurer(s), Tenant shall use commercially reasonable efforts to provide Landlord with thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any coverage required herein. MIN Hilbert Chanhassen 4649706vl CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Resolution 2021­XX: Accept the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Established under he American Rescue Plan Act Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.14. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Finance Director File No:  PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council adopts a resolution Accepting the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Established under he American Rescue Plan Act." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY This resolution authorizes city staff to complete applications on behalf of the City to receive funds.  ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: June 28, 2021 RESOLUTION NO: 2021-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE CORONAVIRUS LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUND ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT WHEREAS, since the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was discovered in the United States in January 2020, the disease has infected over 32 million and killed over 575,000 Americans (“Pandemic”). The disease has impacted every part of life: as social distancing became a necessity, businesses closed, schools transitioned to remote education, travel was sharply reduced, and millions of Americans lost their jobs; WHEREAS, as a result of the Pandemic cities have been called on to respond to the needs of their communities through the prevention, treatment, and vaccination of COVID-19. WHEREAS, city revenues, businesses and nonprofits in the city have faced economic impacts due to the Pandemic. WHEREAS, Congress adopted the American Rescue Plan Act in March 2021 (“ARPA”) which included $65 billion in recovery funds for cities across the country. WHEREAS, ARPA funds are intended to provide support to state, local, and tribal governments in responding to the impact of COVID-19 and in their efforts to contain COVID-19 in their communities, residents, and businesses. WHEREAS, $2,770,845 has been allocated to the City of Chanhassen (“City”) pursuant to the ARPA (“Allocation”). WHEREAS, the United States Department of Treasury has adopted guidance regarding the use of ARPA funds. WHEREAS, the City, in response to the Pandemic, has had expenditures and anticipates future expenditures consistent with the Department of Treasury’s ARPA guidance. WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota will distribute ARPA funds to the City because its population is less than 50,000. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City intends to collect its share of ARPA funds from the State of Minnesota to use in a manner consistent with the Department of Treasury’s guidance. 2 2. City staff, together with the Mayor and the City Attorney are hereby authorized to take any actions necessary to receive the City’s share of ARPA funds from the State of Minnesota for expenses incurred because of the Pandemic. 3. City staff, together with the Mayor and the City Attorney are hereby authorized to make recommendations to the City Council for future expenditures that may be reimbursed with ARPA funds. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2021. ATTEST: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Joseph Perttu Citizen Action Request Section VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Item No: E.1. Prepared By File No:  ATTACHMENTS: Joseph Perttu Citizen Action Request Form Print City Council - Citizen Action Request Form Complete this form and submit it prior to the City Council meeting date you wish to present your request. Select the date of the City Council meeting you plan to attend to make your visitor presentation.* NOTE: The City Council meets on the second and fourth Mondays of each month with the following exceptions in 2021: December 20 - Meeting CANCELLED Printable 2021 City Meeting Calendar 2021 City Meeting Calendar View and/or print this calendar to assist with determining when city council meetings are held in order to make your date selection above. Resident Information First Name*Last Name* Address1* Address2 City*State*Zip* Phone Number*Email* If no email address, enter "none." Citizen Action Request Form - Submission #4887 Date Submitted: 6/15/2021 perttu Joseph 681 Sierra Trail Chanhassen MN 55317 6/28/2021 Council Action Requested* Provide a brief description of the action you are requesting from the City Council. Summary of Information* Provide a narrative of the request including need, costs, timetable, background, etc. What Happens Next? Immediately upon submission of this form, staff will be notified by email and will provide copies to the City Council prior to the selected meeting date. Questions? Contact Deputy City Clerk Kim Meuwissen at 952-227-1107 or by email. City Council Work Session Discussion Date Action City Council Meeting Date Action Addressing the issue of NO PARKING boats (RV', etc...) on the driveway. I missed the last meeting that discussed this. I am sorry but I feel like this issue is not over. I don't think this topic has been thoroughly discussed to offer alternatives to the ordinance. There are financial hardships for some folks if they haven't budgeted for or to find and pay for alternative storage. I personally don't have the room to store my average sized boat on the side of my garage. I have lived in Chanhassen for 25 yrs and this is the first I have heard of not being able to store a boat in the driveway. I have a three stall driveway constructed with storing the boat on the pad on purpose. Prior addresses are 790 Santa Vera, 1000 lake Susan Hills Drive, and now 681 Sierra trail. I keep my properties in excellent condition and have ALWAYS stored my boat during the summer on my driveway. I move it to indoor storage during the fall and winter months. Is this a situation that only takes the side of an obscure and outdated ordinance. I am interested in the names of the council members that aren't protecting my property rights. mm/dd/yyyy mm/dd/yyyy CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Fire Department Update Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: F.1. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No:  SUMMARY Monthly fire department update with response data from May.  ATTACHMENTS: Cover Memo Graphs and Tables TO: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager FROM: Don Johnson, Fire Chief DATE: June 28, 2021 SUBJ: Monthly Fire Department Update Fire Department Staffing Department staffing is at 40 paid on-call firefighters with two firefighters on personal leave. Fire Department Response The fire department responded to (81) calls for service in May. Call Breakdown for the month: 3 Chief Only 17 Day Only 32 Duty Crew 29 General Alarms Significant calls included the following:  (50) Rescue/EMS calls with (6) motor vehicle accidents.  (6) Fire Responses o (3) Building Fires  (2) Mutual Aid Response to Eden Prairie, (1) Mutual Aid to Chaska o (1) Cooking Fire  Heated oil ignited on top of stove on Hunter Drive o (1) Trash Can Fire  Lake Minnewashta Regional Park o (1) Grass Fire  Big Woods involving illegal fireworks Other Activities  On June 14, the fire department was introduced to the new mission, vision, and value statements adopted by the fire department. The new text will be updated on the city website and within department documents. We will begin looking at job descriptions and administrative policies to ensure these practices match our new mission and vision.  I assisted the City of Savage with Fire Chief Interviews on June 21. Laurie Hokkanen Fire Department Update Page 2  Firefighter Fatturi and Chief White are working with city staff on 4th of July Planning and shift postings were released to the fire department the week of June 14.  Completed CPR/AED/Choking Training for City of Chanhassen Seasonal Park and Rec employees at Fire Station 1. Fire Training  Monthly training consisted of group and on-line EMS training. Additionally, small groups also conducted Water Rescue and Boat Operations Training on several evenings of the month. Fire Marshal Council Update  Significant increase in Fire and Life Safety Plan Reviews and Fire Inspections since last month.  2021 Open House planning underway. Planning for a full-fledged Open House again this year. Will have a large team of firefighters working on difference aspects of planning this year.  Completed install of 3 new Knox Secure devices in 3 fire department vehicles the past few weeks. Boxes will secure our Fire Department master keys and able us to track the location of the keys at all times. Fire Investigations  Fire investigation underway on the 8XX Lake Susan Hills Drive fire on June 6. Still a danger of collapse in the garage and not able to enter to further investigate. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Mar Apr May Calls by Type and Month Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire 94 88 76 64 71 88 102 85 85 79 84 86 80 75 65 79 77 74 78 82 65 84 75 83 59 66 83 78 81 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Chanhassen Fire Department Calls By Month Comparison 2019 2020 2021 753 921 1,002 917 887 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Projected Calls for Service by Year Rescue & Emergency Medical Service 60% Alarm Calls 11% Good Intent Call 11% Hazardous Condition 6% Service Call 8% Fire 4% 2021 Calls for Service by % of Call Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire S 13% M 16% T 13% W 14% TH 16% F 12% Sa. 16% 2021 CALLS BY DAY OF WEEK 0 50 100 150 200 250 4-8a 8-12p 12-4p 4-8p 8-12a CALLS BY TIME OF DAY 2019 2020 2021 Basic Incident Date Time: Incident Type (Fd1.21): Elite mnfirereport Incident Type Report (Summary) Incident Type Total Incidents Total Incidents % of Incidents Total Property Loss Total Content Loss Total Loss Incident Type Category: 1 - Fire 111 - Building fire 3 3.7% 113 - Cooking fire, confined to container 1 1.2%0 0 0 118 - Trash or rubbish fire, contained 1 1.2%0 0 0 143 - Grass fire 1 1.2%0 0 0 Total: 6 Total: 7.4%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 3 - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 44 54.3% 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 3 3.7% 324 - Motor vehicle accident with no injuries.3 3.7% Total: 50 Total: 61.7%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 4 - Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 412 - Gas leak (natural gas or LPG)4 4.9% 424 - Carbon monoxide incident 1 1.2% 444 - Power line down 2 2.5% Total: 7 Total: 8.6%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 5 - Service Call 512 - Ring or jewelry removal 1 1.2% 551 - Assist police or other governmental agency 3 3.7% 554 - Assist invalid 3 3.7% Total: 7 Total: 8.6%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 6 - Good Intent Call 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2 2.5% 6111 - EMS Dispatched and cancelled en route 2 2.5% 671 - HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 2 2.5% Total: 6 Total: 7.4%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 7 - False Alarm & False Call 745 - Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 2 2.5% 746 - Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 3 3.7% Total: 5 Total: 6.2%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 81 Total: 100.0%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Report Filters is between '5/1/2021' and '5/31/2021' Report Criteria Is Not Blank Printed On: 06/08/2021 09:26:40 AM1 of 1 ³CH±"F) "F) Minnesota River Rice Lake Lake Riley Lake Susan Rice Marsh Lake Ann Lake St. Joe Harrison Lake Lake Lucy Lotus Lake Clasen Lake Minnewashta Lake Christmas Lake ST15 ST18 ST14 ST17 ST61 SA41 SA5 SA7 SA101 SA5 )212 AudubonRdPowersBlvdC hanhassenRdArboretumBlvd H a z e ltin e B lvd PioneerTrl Lyman Blvd Hwy 2 1 2 Hwy 212MarketBlvdGalpinBlvd Great Pl ainsBlvdHwy 7 Hwy 7 Powers BlvdFl yi ngCloudDr Ar b o r e t u m B l v d Co Rd 101 ST101 GH117 Document Path: K:\Departments\Fire\FireIncidents_RMS\2021-05(May)\2021-05(May).aprxDate Created: 6/9/2021 Created By: City of Chanhassen - Fire Department Calls For Service-May ³CH±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers Lakes Parks Parcel Boundaries Fire Box Alarm Zones North Box South Box West Box µ0 4,000 Feet 0 0.5 Mile City of Chanhassen Fire Calls for Service - May 2021 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Law Enforcement Update Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: F.2. Prepared By Lt. Lance Pearce, CCSO File No:  ATTACHMENTS: Cover memo Monthly report NIBRS codes Monthly breakdown Call trends Page 1 Memo TO: Mayor Ryan and Chanhassen City Council Members FROM: Lieutenant Lance Pearce DATE: June 16, 2021 RE: Law Enforcement Update Attached are the agenda items for the City of Chanhassen council meeting June28, 2021, for your review and consideration. 1. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen May 2021 Calls for Service Summary; Group A, Group B, Non-Criminal, Traffic and Administrative. 2. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen May 2021 Arrest Summary. 3. Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen May 2021 Citation Summary. 4. May 2021 monthly breakdown 5. 2019-2021 Call trends 6. Staffing update: One vacancy in the contract (SRO) and one patrol assignment 7. Training update: Continuation of Patrol Online Training Lieutenant Chanhassen Office May 2021 Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen Call for Service Total Patrol Activity=802 49 11 450 Felony Misdemeanor Non Criminal Traffic May 2021 Types of Calls CFS=802 292 *Homicide=1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Felony Assault Felony Theft Drug Felony Other May 2021 Group A 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 May 2021 Non Criminal 23 181 35 44 Driving Complaint Traffic Stops Crashes Citations 2019-2021 Call Trends Carver County Sheriff’s Office City of Chanhassen 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Domestics by Month 2019 Domestics by Month 2020 Domestics by Month 2021 Domestics by Month 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Domestic Assault by Month 2019 Domestic Assault by Month 2020 Domestic Assault by Month 2021 Domestic Assault by Month 0 5 10 15 20 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Mental Health by Month 2019 Mental Health by Month 2020 Mental Health by Month 2021 Mental Health by Month 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Fraud/ Theft by Month 2019 Fraud/ Theft by Month 2020 Fraud/ Theft by Month 2021 Fraud/ Theft by Month CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Presentation and Approval of the 2020 Audit Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Finance Director File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the adoption of the 2020 audited financial report.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The City's independent auditors, Redpath & Company, have completed the annual audit of the 2020 Annual Financial Report. This year they also completed a Single Audit as required by the CARES Federal grant. The City's Annual Financial Report is attached and is posted on the City's website. The auditor's compliance letters are also included.  Andy Hering will present the results and reports. The PowerPoint presentation is attached. ATTACHMENTS: 2020 Annual Financial Report and Audit compliance letters Auditor Presentation - This page intentionally left blank - COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 Finance Department Kelly Strey, Finance Director Member of Government Finance Officers Association of United States and Canada - This page intentionally left blank - CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Reference No. I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal 3 Certificate of Achievement 7 Organization Chart 8 Organization 9 II. FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 13 Management's Discussion and Analysis 17 Basic Financial Statements: Government-Wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position Statement 1 33 Statement of Activities Statement 2 34 Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds Statement 3 36 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds Statement 4 37 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities Statement 5 38 Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds Statement 6 39 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position - Proprietary Funds Statement 7 40 Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds Statement 8 41 Notes to Financial Statements 43 Required Supplementary Information: Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund Statement 9 90 Schedule of Changes in the City's Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios Statement 10 96 Schedule of Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability - General Employees Retirement Fund Statement 11 97 Schedule of Pension Contributions - General Employees Retirement Fund Statement 12 98 Schedule of Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability - Public Employees Police and Fire Fund Statement 13 99 Schedule of Pension Contributions - Public Employees Police and Fire Fund Statement 14 100 Schedule of Changes in the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios - Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association Statement 15 101 Schedule of Contributions - Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association Statement 16 102 Notes to RSI 103 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Reference No. Combining and Individual Nonmajor Fund Financial Statements and Schedules: Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Statement 17 112 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Statement 18 113 Subcombining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Statement 19 116 Subcombining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Statement 20 117 Subcombining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Debt Service Funds Statement 21 120 Subcombining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Debt Service Funds Statement 22 121 Subcombining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Capital Project Funds Statement 23 124 Subcombining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Capital Project Funds Statement 24 126 Special Revenue Funds: Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual: Contribution Fund Statement 25 129 Cemetery Fund Statement 26 130 CATV Statement 27 131 III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) Financial Trends: Net Position by Component Table 1 136 Changes in Net Position Table 2 138 Fund Balances - Governmental Funds Table 3 142 Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds Table 4 144 Revenue Capacity: Tax Capacity Value and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property Table 5 146 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Capacity Rates Table 6 148 Principal Property Taxpayers Table 7 149 Property Tax Levies and Collections Table 8 151 Debt Capacity: Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type Table 9 152 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding Table 10 154 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt Table 11 155 Legal Debt Margin Information Table 12 156 Pledged Revenue Coverage Table 13 157 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Reference No. Demographic and Economic: Demographic and Economic Statistics Table 14 158 Principal Employers Table 15 159 Operating Information: Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function/Program Table 16 160 Operating Indicators by Function/Program Table 17 162 Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program Table 18 164 Combined Schedule of Indebtedness Exhibit 1 168 Debt Service Payments to Maturity: General Obligation Bonds - Governmental Activities Exhibit 2 170 General Obligation Revenue Bonds Exhibit 3 171 Schedule of Deferred Tax Levies Exhibit 4 172 IV. OTHER INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) - This page intentionally left blank - I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION 1 - This page intentionally left blank - 2 June 9, 2021 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Chanhassen Chanhassen, Minnesota The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota (the City) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 is hereby submitted. This report was prepared by the Chanhassen Finance Department and responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, supporting schedules and statistical tables rests with the City. We believe the data, as presented, is accurate in all material respects; that it is presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs have been included. The organization, form and contents of this report were prepared in accordance with the standards prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Minnesota’s Office of the State Auditor and City policies. This transmittal letter is designed to complement the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and should be read in conjunction with it. The MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors. Reporting Entity and Its Services This report includes all funds and departments of the City (the primary government) and its component unit. The City provides a full range of services to its residents and businesses including general government, public safety (police and fire protection), public works (engineering, streets, and equipment maintenance), parks and recreational activities, and community development. In addition to general municipal services, the City provides water and sanitary sewer service and oversight (through licensing) of the refuse and recycling services. In accordance with the reporting entity definition of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, the City has included the Chanhassen Economic Development Authority (EDA) in these financial statements as a blended component unit. The EDA is governed by five commissioners appointed by the City Council with the City Manager as executive director. The Chanhassen Fire Relief Association has been excluded from this report because it is governed by a board elected by its members and it is not fiscally dependent upon the City. The Western Area Fire Training Association (WAFTA) is governed by an eleven-person board comprised of one member appointed by each jurisdiction who is a party to the joint powers agreement. Although the City is jointly responsible for the maintenance and cleanup costs of the training site in rural Carver County, we do not exercise substantial control of the association. The school districts that serve residents of the City, like all school districts in Minnesota, are governed independently by their own elected board members. They levy their own taxes and prepare their own financial reports. Accordingly, they are excluded from this report. 3 Relevant Financial Policies The City has a policy regarding General Fund reserve balances. The City has a designated fund balance in the General Fund equivalent to 50% of the ensuing year’s budgeted tax levy to provide working capital between semi- annual property tax settlements. The primary financial goal of the City’s investment policy is to ensure the safety and principal invested by the City. Cash temporarily idle during the year is invested in certificates of deposit and obligations of the U.S. Treasury and government agencies. The City only invests in instruments authorized under Minnesota Statute 118A. Cash balances from all City funds are pooled into an investment fund and investment income is distributed on a pro-rata basis at the end of the year, based on average monthly cash balances. At December 31, 2020, the maturities of the investments range from 1 day to 7 years, with an average maturity of 1.6 years. Maturities are not to exceed 7 years unless for a dedicated purpose such as a future bond payment. The average yield to maturity on the portfolio at December 31, 2020 was 1.35%. It is the City’s practice to hold all instruments to maturity. Economic Condition and Outlook The City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, located southwest of the Twin Cities metropolitan area, is situated primarily in Carver County with a small portion in Hennepin County. The City encompasses an area of 23.79 square miles. U.S. Highways 169 and 212, as well as State Highways 5, 7, 41 and 101, provide access for commuters coming into the City from the Twin Cities metropolitan area as well as for residents traveling to work outside the City. The City’s population estimate as of April 1, 2020 was 27,170. Chanhassen’s residential permits were higher in 2020 as compared to 2019. In 2019, there were 58 residential permits as compared to 68 in 2020. The total value of all permits and plan checks in 2020 was $87,160,588. The City anticipates a continuous uptick in residential permits in the coming years and more diversity in housing types, including apartments, townhouses and senior housing. Retail/commercial services and restaurants continue to be in demand. The 118 acre Lifestyle Center, which includes over 500,000 square feet of office and retail space and 575 housing units (including detached townhouses, senior housing and apartments) was approved in 2017 and they are currently working on site grading. Commercial and industrial remodeling and expansion continues the reinvestment into the community. Accounting System and Budgetary Control The City's accounting records are maintained on the accrual, or modified accrual basis, as appropriate. Budgetary control is maintained through the City's accounting and reporting system whereby monthly detail reports of budget versus actual are provided to all departments with summaries being provided to the City Council. Approval listings and documentation are provided for the City Council at each semi-monthly meeting for all checks issued by the City. In the City's accounting system, careful consideration is given to the adequacy of internal controls. These controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not necessarily absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and (2) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. All internal control evaluation occurs within the above framework. We believe the City's internal controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. Capital financings for major municipal improvements are provided through (1) improvement bonds, (2) general obligation bonds, (3) tax increment bonds, or (4) revenue bonds. Internal financing of improvement projects is usually minimal and only for short periods of time. 4 Long Term Financial Planning In 2002, the City undertook an extensive long term financial planning process called “Key Financial Strategies”. As a part of this process the City developed a long term (5 years) general fund budgeting model. In addition the City developed annual strategies and measurement tools, both financial and non-financial, to compare our results from year to year and with other like communities in our area. These strategies and the long term general fund budget are updated on an annual basis as part of our goal setting strategies at the beginning of each year. In addition, the City has a 5 year capital improvement plan in place for infrastructure and equipment, as well as a pavement management plan in place for streets. The City also undertakes an annual rate study of its Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Water rates. As part of this process the City projects fund balances and capital improvements to each of the systems for the next twenty years, and the projected user and connection rates needed for each fund for that same time period. Certificate of Achievement The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Chanhassen for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. The comprehensive annual financial report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. The City of Chanhassen has received a Certificate of Achievement for the last twenty eight consecutive years (fiscal years ended 1992 – 2019). We believe our current report continues to conform to the Certificate of Achievement program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. Independent Audit State law provides that the City may arrange for examination of its books, records, accounts and affairs, or any part thereof, by the State Auditor, or by Certified Public Accountants. It has been a long-standing policy of the City to provide for a complete annual audit of City records by Certified Public Accountants. The auditor’s opinion has been included in this report. Acknowledgments We wish to express our appreciation to the members of the City Council for their support in improving the financial condition of the City. We also want to thank the Finance Department staff and department directors for their assistance in compiling the information necessary for this report. Finally, we wish to acknowledge Redpath and Company, LTD for their assistance in preparing this report. Respectfully submitted, Kelly Strey, Finance Director 5 - This page intentionally left blank - 6 Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Chanhassen Minnesota For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019 Executive Director/CEO 7 City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Organization Chart Citizens Administration Mayor - Council Environmental Commission Planning Commission Senior Commission Park & RecreationPark & Recreation Commission Economic Development Authority Finance Law Enforcement & Fire Administration Public Works Community Development Parks and Recreation 8 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORGANIZATION December 31, 2020 Term Expires Mayor: Elise Ryan 12/31/2022 Council Members: Bethany Tjornhom 12/31/2020 Jerry McDonald 12/31/2020 Julia Coleman 12/31/2022 Dan Campion 12/31/2022 City Manager: Laurie Hokkanen Appointed Finance Director: Kelly Strey Appointed Community Development Director: Kathryn Aanenson Appointed Public Works Director/City Engineer: Charles Howley Appointed Parks and Recreation Director: Jerry Reugemer Appointed 9 - This page intentionally left blank - 10 II. FINANCIAL SECTION 11 - This page intentionally left blank - 12 55 5th Street East, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN, 55101 www.redpathcpas.com INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota as of and for the year ended December 31,2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. 13 We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Opinions In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota as of December 31, 2020, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Report on Summarized Comparative Information We have previously audited the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s 2019 financial statements, and we expressed an unmodified audit opinion on the respective financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information in our report dated June 10, 2020. In our opinion, the summarized comparative information presented herein as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 is consistent, in all material respects, with the audited financial statements from which it has been derived. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis, the budgetary comparison information, and the schedules of OPEB and pension information, as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. 14 Other Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules, statistical section and other information, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, statistical section and other information have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 9, 2021, on our consideration of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance. REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD. St. Paul, Minnesota June 9, 2021 15 - This page intentionally left blank - 16 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS As management of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota (the City), we offer readers of the City’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which can be found in the introductory section of this report. Financial Highlights The assets and deferred outflows of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $151,329,536 (net position). Of this amount, $21,109,724 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the City’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the City's fund designations and fiscal policies. The City’s total net position decreased by $927,188. As of the close of the current fiscal year, governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $15,278,317. Of this amount, $1,669,927 is restricted by external constraints established by creditors, grantors, contributors, or by state statutory provisions. At the end of the current fiscal year, the General Fund had a fund balance of $6,748,766. Of that amount, $63,775 was in a nonspendable form and the remaining $6,684,991 was unassigned. Total debt increased by $3,725,556 during the current fiscal year, from $29,646,332 to $33,371,888. Please refer to the Capital Asset and Debt Administration portion of this analysis for detailed information regarding the City’s debt. Overview of the Financial Statements The management’s discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial statements, which are comprised of three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business. 17 Management’s Discussion and Analysis The statement of net position presents information on all of the City’s assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. The statement of activities presents information showing how net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g. uncollected taxes, and earned but unused vacation leave). Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety, public works, parks and recreation, and community development. The business-type activities include water, sewer, and surface water management. The government-wide financial statements can be found on Statements 1 and 2 of this report. Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of the funds can be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds. Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financial requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City's near-term financial decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. 18 Management’s Discussion and Analysis The City maintains three individual major governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances for the following major funds:  General Fund  Revolving Assessment Fund  TH101 Improvements – Pioneer to Flying Cloud Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report. The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for the General Fund and for the Contribution, Cemetery and CATV special revenue funds. Budgetary comparison statements have been provided for those funds to demonstrate compliance with this budget. The basic governmental fund financial statements can be found on Statements 3 through 5 of this report. Proprietary funds. The City maintains three enterprise funds as a part of its proprietary fund type. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for the following funds:  Water  Sewer  Surface Water Management The basic proprietary fund financial statements can be found on Statements 6 through 8 of this report. Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements can be found following Statement 8 of this report. Other information. The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with nonmajor governmental funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information. Combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules can be found on Statements 17 through 27 of this report. 19 Management’s Discussion and Analysis Government-Wide Financial Analysis As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. Assets plus deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities plus deferred inflows of resources by $151,329,536 at the close of the most recent fiscal year. The largest portion of the City’s net position ($128,590,593, or 85%) reflects its net investment in capital assets (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City’s investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. City of Chanhassen, Minnesota's Net Position 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 Assets: Current and other assets $23,095,175 $18,543,161 $19,873,878 $16,376,687 $42,969,053 $34,919,848 Other noncurrent assets - - 179,893 179,893 - Capital assets 77,468,634 78,971,450 77,515,811 77,183,921 154,984,445 156,155,371 Total assets 100,563,809 97,514,611 97,569,582 93,560,608 198,133,391 191,075,219 Total deferred outflows of resources 638,859 686,256 76,590 69,933 715,449 756,189 Liabilities: Long-term liabilities outstanding 10,056,602 10,784,539 29,616,581 24,685,540 39,673,183 35,470,079 Other liabilities 6,367,384 1,807,748 719,555 746,825 7,086,939 2,554,573 Total liabilities 16,423,986 12,592,287 30,336,136 25,432,365 46,760,122 38,024,652 Total deferred inflows of resources 716,333 1,378,997 42,849 171,035 759,182 1,550,032 Net position: Net investment in capital assets 73,063,927 72,986,179 55,526,666 54,469,960 128,590,593 127,456,139 Restricted 1,629,219 2,883,391 - - 1,629,219 2,883,391 Unrestricted 9,369,203 8,360,013 11,740,521 13,557,181 21,109,724 21,917,194 Total net position $84,062,349 $84,229,583 $67,267,187 $68,027,141 $151,329,536 $152,256,724 Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals $1,629,219 of the City’s net position represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position ($21,109,724) may be used to meet ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all three categories of net position, both for the City as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business-type activities. 20 Management’s Discussion and Analysis Governmental Activities Total net position of the governmental activities decreased $167,234 or 0.20%. The most significant components of change in net position are as follows:  Net investment in capital assets increased $77,748. This increase was due to scheduled bond payments, offset by current year depreciation exceeding capital asset additions.  Restricted net position decreased $1,254,172. This decrease occurred due to pay off of the 2010A GO Library Refunding Bonds and use of capital fund reserve funds for park improvements.  Unrestricted net position increased $1,009,190 resulting from a shift in net position into this category from restricted net position. Business-Type Activities The total net position of the City’s business-type activities decreased by $759,954 primarily due to an increase in bonds payable for newly issued debt. Unrestricted net position decreased $1,816,660 primarily due to transfers out to fund utility infrastructure construction costs to the capital funds. 21 Management’s Discussion and Analysis City of Chanhassen, Minnesota's Changes in Net Position 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 Revenues: Program revenues: Charges for services $4,392,983 $3,228,164 $7,877,852 $7,251,421 $12,270,835 $10,479,585 Operating grants and contributions 14,970,473 2,770,655 39,552 460,905 15,010,025 3,231,560 Capital grants and contributions 4,066,959 4,716,702 2,084,681 3,108,377 6,151,640 7,825,079 General revenues: General property taxes 11,745,709 10,996,831 - - 11,745,709 10,996,831 Tax increment collections 236,485 - - - 236,485 - Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs - 20,009 - - - 20,009 Unrestricted investment earnings 368,168 491,345 390,604 548,747 758,772 1,040,092 Gain on sale of capital assets - 103,976 1,795 43,498 1,795 147,474 Total revenues 35,780,777 22,327,682 10,394,484 11,412,948 46,175,261 33,740,630 Expenses: General government 3,503,418 2,968,604 - - 3,503,418 2,968,604 Public safety 3,975,838 4,045,361 - - 3,975,838 4,045,361 Public works 25,142,224 9,808,088 - - 25,142,224 9,808,088 Parks and recreation 2,704,009 3,275,021 - - 2,704,009 3,275,021 Community development 754,205 535,700 - - 754,205 535,700 Interest and fees on long-term debt 107,993 132,327 - - 107,993 132,327 Water - - 4,908,477 5,842,506 4,908,477 5,842,506 Sewer - - 4,312,195 3,879,581 4,312,195 3,879,581 Surface water management - - 1,694,090 1,918,378 1,694,090 1,918,378 Total expenses 36,187,687 20,765,101 10,914,762 11,640,465 47,102,449 32,405,566 Increase (decrease) in net position before transfers (406,910) 1,562,581 (520,278) (227,517) (927,188) 1,335,064 Transfers 239,676 283,007 (239,676) (283,007) - - Change in net position (167,234) 1,845,588 (759,954) (510,524) (927,188) 1,335,064 Net position - beginning 84,229,583 82,383,995 68,027,141 68,537,665 152,256,724 150,921,660 Net position - ending $84,062,349 $84,229,583 $67,267,187 $68,027,141 $151,329,536 $152,256,724 Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals 22 Management’s Discussion and Analysis Governmental Activities Revenues Revenues for the governmental activities increased by $13,453,095. This increase is largely due to reimbursements related to the Highway 101 construction project. Expenses Expenses for the governmental activities increased by $15,422,586, or 74%. This increase was largely due to non-capitalized construction costs related to the Highway 101 construction project. Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues and expenses: 23 Management’s Discussion and Analysis Business-Type Activities Revenues Revenues for the business-type activities decreased by $1,018,464, or 9%. The decrease was primarily due to lower charges for services revenue compared to the previous year because of a decrease in connection charges. Expenses Expenses for business-type activities decreased by $725,703, or 6%. The decrease was primarily due to increased maintenance expense in the previous year for painting one of the City’s water towers. 24 Management’s Discussion and Analysis Below are specific graphs showing the business-type activities revenue and expense comparisons: 25 Management’s Discussion and Analysis Financial Analysis of the Government's Funds Governmental funds. The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City’s financing requirements. In particular, unrestricted fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $15,278,317. Approximately 11% of this total amount ($1,669,927) constitutes fund balance restricted by external constraints established by creditors, grantors, contributors, or by state statutory provisions. $113,465 of fund balance is not in a spendable form, $6,809,934 has been assigned, and $6,684,991 is unassigned. The General Fund balance increased by $1,410,697 in 2020. The increase was primarily due to high permit revenues, receipt of federal grant funds and lower staffing costs as a result of COVID 19 restrictions. The Revolving Assessment Fund balance increased by $470,316. The increase was due to newly created franchise fee revenue, offset by construction project expenditures. The TH101 Improvements – Pioneer to Flying Cloud Fund balance did not change in 2020. The nonmajor special revenue funds increased by $44,747. The increase was largely due to Cable TV franchise revenues exceeding expenditures. The nonmajor debt service funds decreased by $557,777. The decrease was primarily due to the payoff of the 2010A GO Library Refunding Bonds. The nonmajor capital project funds decreased by $1,037,162. The decrease was primarily due to the use of reserve funds for capital outlay expenditures. Proprietary funds. The City’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements, but in more detail. The unrestricted net position in the respective proprietary funds is $4,842,419 (Water), $5,444,619 (Sewer) and $1,453,483 (Surface Water Management). Net position in the Water Fund decreased by $267,641. The decrease is due to lower connection charges than the previous year. Net position in the Sewer Fund decreased by $550,599. The decrease was mainly due to lower connection charges than the previous year. Net position in the Surface Water Management Fund increased by $58,286. There was nothing significant that contributed to this increase. 26 Management’s Discussion and Analysis Budgetary Highlights General Fund There were no budget amendments to the General Fund in 2020. Budgetary Variances – Revenues The positive General Fund revenue variance of $586,568 was primarily due to building permit revenue exceeding budget and the receipt of federal grant funds related to COVID 19. Budgetary Variances – Expenditures Expenditures for the General Fund had a positive variance of $824,129. This was primarily due to personal services being below budget because of altered staffing levels due to COVID 19. Capital Asset and Debt Administration Capital assets. The City’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type activities as of December 31, 2020 amounts to $154,984,445 (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment in capital assets includes land, easements, buildings, infrastructure, machinery, and equipment. 27 Management’s Discussion and Analysis City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s Capital Assets (Net of Depreciation) Primary Government Balance Increase Decrease Balance Governmental activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $19,912,318 $ - $ - $19,912,318 Construction in progress 1,491,353 729,738 (1,403,788) 817,303 Permanent easements 1,749,556 272,300 - 2,021,856 Total capital assets not being depreciated 23,153,227 1,002,038 (1,403,788) 22,751,477 Capital assets being depreciated: Buildings and structures 23,411,160 1,468,155 (66,500) 24,812,815 Machinery and equipment 9,990,718 609,862 (575,167) 10,025,413 Other improvements 9,392,396 174,141 (111,123) 9,455,414 Infrastructure 122,125,843 1,899,993 (234,627) 123,791,209 Temporary easements 3,436,870 1,325,383 - 4,762,253 Total capital assets being depreciated 168,356,987 5,477,534 (987,417) 172,847,104 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and structures 9,541,253 568,502 (26,600) 10,083,155 Machinery and equipment 6,100,050 523,917 (460,173) 6,163,794 Other improvements 4,540,881 398,074 (93,311) 4,845,644 Infrastructure 91,966,549 3,194,389 (234,627) 94,926,311 Temporary easements 390,031 1,721,012 - 2,111,043 Total accumulated depreciation 112,538,764 6,405,894 (814,711) 118,129,947 Governmental activities capital assets - net $78,971,450 $73,678 ($1,576,494) $77,468,634 Primary Government Balance Increase Decrease Balance Business-type activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $2,104,535 $4,200 $ - $2,108,735 Construction in progress 1,238,374 2,475,298 (904,493) 2,809,179 Permanent easements 2,117,722 672,850 - 2,790,572 Total capital assets not being depreciated 5,460,631 3,152,348 (904,493) 7,708,486 Capital assets being depreciated: Buildings and structures 28,077,579 - - 28,077,579 Machinery and equipment 2,031,661 163,302 (189,529) 2,005,434 Other improvements 118,697,979 1,835,779 (80,557) 120,453,201 Total capital assets being depreciated 148,807,219 1,999,081 (270,086) 150,536,214 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and structures 3,299,195 561,611 - 3,860,806 Machinery and equipment 1,070,641 151,470 (109,813) 1,112,298 Other improvements 72,714,093 3,121,292 (79,600) 75,755,785 Total accumulated depreciation 77,083,929 3,834,373 (189,413) 80,728,889 Business-type activities capital assets - net 77,183,921 1,317,056 (985,166) 77,515,811 Total capital assets - net $156,155,371 $1,390,734 ($2,561,660) $154,984,445 Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in Note 5. 28 Management’s Discussion and Analysis Governmental Activities Capital Assets. There was a decrease in capital assets due to the reduction in depreciable assets (current year depreciation expense exceeded current year additions). Business-Type Activities Capital Assets. There was an increase in capital assets due to improvements related to the Highway 101 construction project. Long-term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonds payable outstanding of $32,825,780 an increase of $3,179,448 from 2019. The balance of the bonds payable outstanding is comprised of $4,130,000 in general obligation bonds, $27,285,000 of revenue bonds which financed capital investments for the water, sewer, and surface water management operations, and unamortized bond premiums of $1,410,780. In 2020, the City entered into a long-term financing arrangement with Carver County for the Lyman Boulevard project. The long-term portion of the arrangement is $546,108. Additional long-term debt in the amount of $887,314 for compensated absences was also outstanding at the end of 2020. 29 Management’s Discussion and Analysis City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s Outstanding Debt 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 General obligation bonds $4,130,000 $5,715,000 $ - $ - $4,130,000 $5,715,000 Revenue bonds - - 27,285,000 22,935,000 27,285,000 22,935,000 Bond premium 159,848 175,833 1,250,932 820,499 1,410,780 996,332 Project financing 546,108 - - - 546,108 - Compensated absences 682,281 682,952 205,033 192,075 887,314 875,027 Total $5,518,237 $6,573,785 $28,740,965 $23,947,574 $34,259,202 $30,521,359 TotalsBusiness-Type ActivitiesGovernmental Activities As the financial statements will indicate, the City maintained strong financial reserves and continues its practice of utilizing multiple long term financial planning documents. The City’s bond rating was affirmed in February 2020 by Standard & Poor’s. The City of Chanhassen is one of approximately 25 communities in the State of Minnesota to have an AAA bond rating from Standard & Poor’s. State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue to 3% of the total estimated market value. The current debt limitation for the City is $142,499,616. Of the City's outstanding debt, $4,130,000 is applicable to the statutory limitation. Additional information on the City’s long-term debt can be found in Note 6. Requests for Information. This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s finances for all those with an interest in the government’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Director of Finance, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317. 30 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 - This page intentionally left blank - 32 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET POSITION Statement 1 December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For December 31, 2019 Governmental Business-Type Activities Activities 2020 2019 Assets: Cash and investments $18,103,575 $13,028,986 $31,132,561 $28,821,650 Restricted cash - 5,657,940 5,657,940 301 Accrued interest receivable 75,748 82,880 158,628 141,210 Due from other governmental units 2,095,437 14,504 2,109,941 2,149,751 Accounts receivable - net 645,807 1,479,074 2,124,881 1,492,227 Property taxes receivable 87,260 - 87,260 209,707 Prepaid items 113,465 55,647 169,112 118,527 Inventories - at cost - 94,449 94,449 53,643 Internal balances 568,962 (568,962) - - Special assessments receivable 1,404,921 29,360 1,434,281 1,752,939 Receivable not expected to be collected within one year - 179,893 179,893 179,893 Capital assets (net of accumulated depreciation): Nondepreciable 22,751,477 7,708,486 30,459,963 28,613,858 Depreciable 54,717,157 69,807,325 124,524,482 127,541,513 Total assets 100,563,809 97,569,582 198,133,391 191,075,219 Deferred outflows of resources: Deferred outflows of resources related to other post employement benefits 12,038 4,063 16,101 9,118 Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions 626,821 72,527 699,348 747,071 Total deferred outflows of resources 638,859 76,590 715,449 756,189 Liabilities: Accounts payable 909,171 130,146 1,039,317 990,308 Due to other governmental units 1,702,402 53,978 1,756,380 356,792 Salaries payable 173,765 40,184 213,949 298,259 Contracts payable 1,166,302 95,841 1,262,143 466,080 Escrow deposits payable 2,294,023 - 2,294,023 Accrued interest payable 40,708 398,231 438,939 352,150 Unearned revenue 81,013 1,175 82,188 90,984 Compensated absences payable: Due within one year 106,820 32,101 138,921 126,338 Due in more than one year 575,461 172,932 748,393 748,689 Other post employment benefits payable: Due in more than one year 125,320 42,302 167,622 155,719 Bonds payable: Due within one year 360,000 2,105,000 2,465,000 2,615,000 Due in more than one year 3,929,848 26,430,932 30,360,780 27,031,332 Project financing Due in more than one year 546,108 - 546,108 - Net pension liability: Due in more than one year 4,413,045 833,314 5,246,359 4,793,001 Total liabilities 16,423,986 30,336,136 46,760,122 38,024,652 Deferred inflows of resources: Deferred inflows of resources related to other post employement benefits 56,329 19,014 75,343 73,218 Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions 660,004 23,835 683,839 1,476,814 Total deferred inflows of resources 716,333 42,849 759,182 1,550,032 Net position: Net investment in capital assets 73,063,927 55,526,666 128,590,593 127,456,139 Restricted for: Debt service 564,714 - 564,714 1,283,606 Park improvements 991,872 - 991,872 1,537,790 Tax increment 6,668 - 6,668 - Other purposes 65,965 - 65,965 61,995 Unrestricted 9,369,203 11,740,521 21,109,724 21,917,194 Total net position $84,062,349 $67,267,187 $151,329,536 $152,256,724 Totals The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 33 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 Program Revenues Charges For Functions/Programs Expenses Services Primary government: Governmental activities: General government $3,503,418 $2,252,594 Public safety 3,975,838 1,550,768 Public works 25,142,224 396,649 Parks and recreation 2,704,009 162,546 Community development 754,205 30,426 Interest and fees on long-term debt 107,993 - Total governmental activities 36,187,687 4,392,983 Business-type activities: Water 4,908,477 3,533,939 Sewer 4,312,195 3,260,080 Surface water management 1,694,090 1,083,833 Total business-type activities 10,914,762 7,877,852 Total primary government $47,102,449 $12,270,835 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 34 Statement 2 Operating Capital Grants and Grants and Governmental Business-Type Contributions Contributions Activities Activities 2020 2019 $529,246 $749,084 $27,506 $ - $27,506 ($2,447,127) 817,841 101,635 (1,505,594) - (1,505,594) (2,109,583) 13,613,084 3,118,454 (8,014,037) - (8,014,037) (2,682,253) 10,302 97,786 (2,433,375) - (2,433,375) (2,171,456) - - (723,779) - (723,779) (506,834) - - (107,993) - (107,993) (132,327) 14,970,473 4,066,959 (12,757,272)0 (12,757,272) (10,049,580) 486 896,361 - (477,691) (477,691) (1,135,157) 486 480,089 - (571,540) (571,540)69,178 38,580 708,231 - 136,554 136,554 246,217 39,552 2,084,681 0 (912,677) (912,677) (819,762) $15,010,025 $6,151,640 (12,757,272)(912,677) (13,669,949) (10,869,342) General revenues: General property taxes 11,745,709 - 11,745,709 10,996,831 Tax increment collections 236,485 - 236,485 - Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs - - - 20,009 Unrestricted investment earnings 368,168 390,604 758,772 1,040,092 Gain on sale of capital assets - 1,795 1,795 147,474 Transfers 239,676 (239,676) - - Total general revenues and transfers 12,590,038 152,723 12,742,761 12,204,406 Change in net position (167,234)(759,954) (927,188) 1,335,064 Net position - January 1 84,229,583 68,027,141 152,256,724 150,921,660 Net position - December 31 $84,062,349 $67,267,187 $151,329,536 $152,256,724 Program Revenues Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position Totals The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 35 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA BALANCE SHEET Statement 3 GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For December 31, 2019 605 TH101 Improvements - Other 601 Revolving Pioneer to Governmental General Fund Assessment Fund Flying Cloud Funds Assets:2020 2019 Cash and investments $9,273,089 $3,042,986 $128,607 $5,658,893 $18,103,575 $16,128,920 Accrued interest receivable 27,343 12,253 - 36,152 75,748 66,396 Due from other governmental units 86,440 1,485,623 522,403 971 2,095,437 1,750,554 Due from other funds - - - - - 508,701 Accounts receivable - net 93,130 465,603 - 87,074 645,807 130,729 Property taxes receivable 87,260 - - - 87,260 209,707 Prepaid items 63,775 - - 49,690 113,465 91,046 Interfund loan receivable - - - 568,962 568,962 749,440 Special assessments receivable - 1,085,393 - 319,528 1,404,921 1,707,961 Total assets $9,631,037 $6,091,858 $651,010 $6,721,270 $23,095,175 $21,343,454 Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balances Liabilities: Accounts payable $203,497 $95,762 $17,509 $592,403 $909,171 $887,969 Due to other governmental units 46,723 1,645,000 - 10,679 1,702,402 271,885 Escrow deposits payable 2,294,023 - - - 2,294,023 2,221,790 Due to other funds - - - - - 508,701 Salaries payable 170,404 - - 3,361 173,765 245,667 Contracts payable - 598,578 557,835 9,889 1,166,302 321,170 Interfund loan payable - - - - - - Unearned revenue 80,364 649 - - 81,013 90,159 Total liabilities 2,795,011 2,339,989 575,344 616,332 6,326,676 4,547,341 Deferred inflows of resources: Unavailable revenue 87,260 1,083,394 - 319,528 1,490,182 1,848,617 Fund balances: Nonspendable 63,775 - - 49,690 113,465 91,046 Restricted - - - 1,669,927 1,669,927 2,944,091 Assigned - 2,668,475 75,666 4,065,793 6,809,934 6,657,125 Unassigned 6,684,991 - - - 6,684,991 5,255,234 Total fund balances 6,748,766 2,668,475 75,666 5,785,410 15,278,317 14,947,496 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances $9,631,037 $6,091,858 $651,010 $6,721,270 $23,095,175 $21,343,454 Fund balance reported above $15,278,317 $14,947,496 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds.77,468,634 78,971,450 Other long-term assets are not available to pay for current period expenditures and, therefore, are reported as unavailabe revenue in the funds.1,490,182 1,848,617 Long-term liabilities, including pension related deferred outflows and inflows, are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not reported in the funds (see Note 1U).(10,174,784) (11,537,980) Net position of governmental activities $84,062,349 $84,229,583 Total Governmental Funds The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 36 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND Statement 4 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 605 TH101 Improvements - Other 601 Revolving Pioneer to Governmental General Fund Assessment Fund Flying Cloud Funds Revenues:2020 2019 General property taxes $9,241,003 $728,523 $ - $1,831,012 $11,800,538 $10,960,876 Tax increment collections - - - 236,485 236,485 - Licenses and permits 1,546,669 - - 28,111 1,574,780 2,047,190 Intergovernmental 804,688 1,392,456 14,483,520 1,888,665 18,569,329 6,294,417 Franchise fees - 1,648,893 - 177,362 1,826,255 185,181 Special assessments - 464,021 - 352 464,373 727,026 Charges for services 347,115 - - 199,694 546,809 622,829 Fines and forfeits 73,800 - - - 73,800 89,989 Investment earnings 127,746 57,536 - 182,886 368,168 491,345 Contributions and donations 31,231 - - 24,870 56,101 70,202 Refunds and reimbursements 55,214 - - 33,731 88,945 73,468 Other 258,802 - - 4,400 263,202 209,507 Total revenues 12,486,268 4,291,429 14,483,520 4,607,568 35,868,785 21,772,030 Expenditures: Current: General government 2,272,604 - - 1,089,167 3,361,771 2,644,661 Public safety 3,765,520 - - 21,385 3,786,905 3,802,544 Public works 2,621,483 4,104,652 13,019,108 381,808 20,127,051 6,041,417 Parks and recreation 1,842,466 - - 12,005 1,854,471 2,418,229 Community development 573,498 - - 229,736 803,234 567,461 Capital outlay: General government - - - 833,034 833,034 110,044 Public safety - - - 387,528 387,528 701,818 Public works - 1,825,842 2,656,163 456,476 4,938,481 4,959,997 Parks and recreation - - 57,129 1,064,094 1,121,223 797,124 Debt service: Principal - - - 1,585,000 1,585,000 720,000 Interest and paying agent fees - - - 143,970 143,970 157,312 Total expenditures 11,075,571 5,930,494 15,732,400 6,204,203 38,942,668 22,920,607 Revenues over (under) expenditures 1,410,697 (1,639,065) (1,248,880) (1,596,635) (3,073,883) (1,148,577) Other financing sources (uses): Sale of capital assets - - - 46,443 46,443 25,698 Project financing issued - 546,108 - - 546,108 - Transfers in - 1,563,273 1,248,880 40,724 2,852,877 2,153,197 Transfers out - - - (40,724) (40,724) (855,912) Total other financing sources (uses)0 2,109,381 1,248,880 46,443 3,404,704 1,322,983 Net change in fund balance 1,410,697 470,316 0 (1,550,192) 330,821 174,406 Fund balance - January 1 5,338,069 2,198,159 75,666 7,335,602 14,947,496 14,773,090 Fund balance - December 31 $6,748,766 $2,668,475 $75,666 $5,785,410 $15,278,317 $14,947,496 Total Governmental Funds The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 37 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES,Statement 5 EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2020 2019 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities (Statement 2) are different because: Net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds (Statement 4)$330,821 $174,406 Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense: Capital outlay 7,280,266 6,568,983 Depreciation expense (6,405,894) (5,118,228) The net effect of various miscellaneous transactions involving capital assets (i.e. sales, trade-ins and donations) is to increase (decrease) net position. Developer contributed infrastructure 235,596 494,542 Transfer of capital assets to Enterprise Funds (2,572,477) (1,014,278) Gain (loss) on disposal/trade-ins of capital assets (40,307)85,931 Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources are not reported as revenues in the funds. Change in delinquent property taxes (54,829)35,955 Change in deferred and delinquent special assessments (303,606)(90,936) The issuance of long-term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net position. Also, governmental funds report the effects of bond premiums when the debt is first issued, whereas amounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the debt in the statement of activities. Project financing (546,108) - Repayment of principal 1,585,000 720,000 Amortization of bond premiums 15,985 15,985 Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Expenses reported in the statement of activities include the effects of the changes in these expense accruals as follows: Change in compensated absences payable 671 (6,112) Change in other post employment benefits payable 50,208 (20,751) Change in accrued interest payable 19,992 9,000 Governmental funds report pension contributions as expenditures, however, pension expense is reported in the statement of activities. This is the amount by which pension expense exceeds pension contributions.237,448 (8,909) Change in net position of governmental activities (Statement 2)($167,234) $1,845,588 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 38 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF NET POSITION Statement 6 PROPRIETARY FUNDS December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For December 31, 2019 Water Sewer Surface Water Management 2020 2019 Assets: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $6,253,960 $5,468,733 $1,306,293 $13,028,986 $14,984,322 Restricted cash 3,605,720 700,357 1,351,863 5,657,940 301 Accrued interest receivable 38,273 37,101 7,506 82,880 74,814 Due from other governmental units 1,062 318 13,124 14,504 399,197 Accounts receivable - net 600,714 631,268 247,092 1,479,074 1,361,498 Prepaid items 20,844 19,037 15,766 55,647 27,481 Water meter inventory 94,449 - - 94,449 53,643 Special assessments receivable 28,751 609 - 29,360 43,371 Connection charges receivable - - - - 1,607 Total current assets 10,643,773 6,857,423 2,941,644 20,442,840 16,946,234 Noncurrent assets: Receivables not expected to be collected within one year 0 0 179,893 179,893 179,893 Capital assets: Nondepreciable 4,142,201 1,852,872 1,713,413 7,708,486 5,460,631 Depreciable 82,195,844 36,735,924 31,604,446 150,536,214 148,807,219 Total capital assets 86,338,045 38,588,796 33,317,859 158,244,700 154,267,850 Less: Allowance for depreciation (35,620,380) (26,434,798) (18,673,711) (80,728,889) (77,083,929) Net capital assets 50,717,665 12,153,998 14,644,148 77,515,811 77,183,921 Total noncurrent assets 50,717,665 12,153,998 14,824,041 77,695,704 77,363,814 Total assets 61,361,438 19,011,421 17,765,685 98,138,544 94,310,048 Deferred outflows of resources: Related to other post employment benefits 1,774 1,469 820 4,063 - Related to pensions 31,145 25,462 15,920 72,527 69,933 Total deferred outflows of resources 32,919 26,931 16,740 76,590 69,933 Liabilities: Current liabilities: Accounts payable 60,098 51,356 18,692 130,146 172,141 Due to other governmental units 6,198 17,817 29,963 53,978 84,907 Salaries payable 18,081 12,798 9,305 40,184 52,592 Contracts payable 44,717 48,030 3,094 95,841 144,910 Accrued interest payable 357,403 14,697 26,131 398,231 291,450 Unearned revenue - - 1,175 1,175 825 Interfund loan payable - due within one year 193,593 - - 193,593 193,225 Compensated absences payable - due within one year 13,399 11,519 7,183 32,101 27,732 Bonds payable - due within one year 1,865,000 125,000 115,000 2,105,000 1,870,000 Total current liabilities 2,558,489 281,217 210,543 3,050,249 2,837,782 Noncurrent liabilities: Other post employment benefits 18,470 15,292 8,540 42,302 - Interfund loan payable 375,369 - - 375,369 556,215 Compensated absences payable 72,180 62,054 38,698 172,932 164,343 Bonds payable 24,404,056 778,448 1,248,428 26,430,932 21,885,499 Net pension liability 359,247 292,161 181,906 833,314 737,966 Total noncurrent liabilities 25,229,322 1,147,955 1,477,572 27,854,849 23,344,023 Total liabilities 27,787,811 1,429,172 1,688,115 30,905,098 26,181,805 Deferred inflows of resources: Related to other post employment benefits 8,302 6,873 3,839 19,014 - Related to pensions 7,055 9,281 7,499 23,835 171,035 15,357 16,154 11,338 42,849 171,035 Net position: Net investment in capital assets 28,748,770 12,148,407 14,629,489 55,526,666 54,469,960 Unrestricted 4,842,419 5,444,619 1,453,483 11,740,521 13,557,181 Total net position $33,591,189 $17,593,026 $16,082,972 $67,267,187 $68,027,141 Totals The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 39 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND Statement 7 CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 Water Sewer Surface Water Management 2020 2019 Operating revenues: Charges for services $3,418,138 $3,160,226 $1,063,616 $7,641,980 $6,862,986 Penalties and other 111,772 51,885 16,982 180,639 211,406 Intergovernmental 486 486 38,580 39,552 428,408 Total operating revenues 3,530,396 3,212,597 1,119,178 7,862,171 7,502,800 Operating expenses: Personal services 882,002 506,832 363,057 1,751,891 1,573,387 Materials and supplies 307,496 40,497 15,198 363,191 367,954 Contractual services: MCES - 2,120,208 - 2,120,208 1,904,789 Other 650,247 534,877 318,135 1,503,259 2,836,936 Repairs and maintenance 395,947 121,819 2,851 520,617 471,996 Depreciation 1,935,991 942,382 956,000 3,834,373 3,825,900 Total operating expenses 4,171,683 4,266,615 1,655,241 10,093,539 10,980,962 Operating income (loss)(641,287) (1,054,018) (536,063) (2,231,368) (3,478,162) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment earnings 181,155 173,691 35,758 390,604 548,747 Refunds and reimbursements 4,029 47,969 3,235 55,233 6,426 Interest and fiscal charges (736,794) (22,577) (38,385) (797,756) (659,503) Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets 1,795 (23,004)(464) (21,673)43,498 Total nonoperating revenues (expenses)(549,815) 176,079 144 (373,592) (60,832) Income before contributions and transfers (1,191,102) (877,939) (535,919) (2,604,960) (3,538,994) Transfers in - - - - 9,453 Transfers out (1,555,846) (983,663) (272,644) (2,812,153) (1,306,738) Capital contributions: Intergovernmental revenue - - - - 203,100 Contributions of capital assets 1,908,677 1,149,307 604,290 3,662,274 1,470,361 Special assessments 3,797 82 - 3,879 4,130 Connection charges 566,833 161,614 262,559 991,006 2,648,164 Total contributions and transfers 923,461 327,340 594,205 1,845,006 3,028,470 Change in net position (267,641) (550,599)58,286 (759,954) (510,524) Net position - January 1 33,858,830 18,143,625 16,024,686 68,027,141 68,537,665 Net position - December 31 $33,591,189 $17,593,026 $16,082,972 $67,267,187 $68,027,141 Capital Transfers - Contributions Net Amounts reported above $4,657,158 ($2,812,153) Amounts reported for business-type activities in the statement of activities are different because: Transfer in of capital assets from governmental activities (2,572,477) 2,572,477 Amounts reported on the statement of activities $2,084,681 ($239,676) Totals The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 40 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Statement 8 PROPRIETARY FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 Water Sewer Surface Water Management 2020 2019 Cash flows from operating activities: Receipts from customers and users $3,667,138 $3,182,335 $1,280,165 $8,129,638 $7,330,418 Payment to suppliers (1,505,685) (2,767,960) (371,767) (4,645,412) (5,631,758) Payment to employees (885,367) (509,928) (353,239) (1,748,534) (1,580,975) Miscellaneous revenue 4,029 47,969 3,235 55,233 6,426 Net cash flows provided by (used by) operating activities 1,280,115 (47,584) 558,394 1,790,925 124,111 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Transfers in - - - - 9,453 Interfund loan receivable - collections - - - - 96,065 Interfund loan payable - (payments)(193,225) - - (193,225) (192,867) Net cash flows used by noncapital financing activities (193,225)0 0 (193,225) (87,349) Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Acquisition of capital assets (377,180) (72,287) (129,024) (578,491) (768,792) Connection charges 568,037 162,017 262,559 992,613 2,658,845 Intergovernmental revenue - - - - 30,000 Special assessment collections 17,199 691 - 17,890 10,782 Transfers out (1,555,846) (983,663) (272,644) (2,812,153) (1,306,738) Proceeds from issuance of bonds 4,682,300 711,609 1,374,365 6,768,274 - Principal paid on bonds (1,807,500) (62,500) - (1,870,000) (1,850,000) Interest and fiscal charges (757,869) (15,008) (23,191) (796,068) (766,029) Net cash flows used by capital and related financing activities 769,141 (259,141) 1,212,065 1,722,065 (1,991,932) Cash flows from investing activities: Investment earnings 180,120 167,319 35,099 382,538 550,417 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 2,036,151 (139,406) 1,805,558 3,702,303 (1,404,753) Cash and cash equivalents - January 1 7,823,529 6,308,496 852,598 14,984,623 16,389,376 Cash and cash equivalents - December 31 $9,859,680 $6,169,090 $2,658,156 $18,686,926 $14,984,623 Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: Operating loss ($641,287) ($1,054,018) ($536,063) ($2,231,368) ($3,478,162) Adjustments to reconcile operating loss to net cash flows from operating activities: Miscellaneous revenue 4,029 47,969 3,235 55,233 6,426 Depreciation 1,935,991 942,382 956,000 3,834,373 3,825,900 Changes in assets and liabilities, deferred outflows and inflows: Decrease (increase) in receivables 136,742 (30,262) 160,637 267,117 (172,382) Decrease (increase) in prepaid items (11,334) (9,848) (6,984) (28,166) 19,609 Decrease (increase) in inventory (40,806) - - (40,806) 9,230 Decrease (increase) in deferred outflows of resources (2,942) (2,364) (1,351) (6,657) 69,545 Increase (decrease) in payables (103,710) 54,289 (18,844) (68,265) (88,495) Increase (decrease) in other post employment benefits 18,470 15,292 8,540 42,302 - Increase (decrease) in net pension liability 42,919 32,908 19,521 95,348 (36,122) Increase (decrease) in deferred inflows of resources (57,957) (43,932) (26,297) (128,186) (31,438) Total adjustments 1,921,402 1,006,434 1,094,457 4,022,293 3,602,273 Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities $1,280,115 ($47,584) $558,394 $1,790,925 $124,111 Noncash investing, capital and financing activities: Capital assets in the amount of $1,908,677 and $679,114 were contributed to the Water Fund in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Capital assets in the amount of $1,149,307 and $261,894 were contributed to the Sewer Fund in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Capital assets in the amount of $604,290 and $529,353 were contributed to the Surface Water Fund in 2020 and 2019, respectively. Totals The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 41 - This page intentionally left blank - 42 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Note 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The City of Chanhassen (the City) was incorporated in 1967 and operates under the State of Minnesota Statutory Plan B form of government. The governing body consists of a five member City council elected by voters of the City. The financial statements of the City have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applied to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies. A. FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY In accordance with GASB pronouncements and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the financial statements of the reporting entity should include those of the City (the primary government) and its component units. The component unit discussed below is included in the City’s reporting entity because of the significance of its operational or financial relationships with the City. COMPONENT UNITS The City has one component unit, the Economic Development Authority (EDA). The financial statements of the EDA are included as a blended component unit because its governing body is substantively the same as the City Council, the City is in a relationship of financial burden with the EDA, and because management of the City have operational responsibilities for the EDA. Separate financial statements for the EDA are not prepared. JOINTLY GOVERNED ORGANIZATIONS Southwest Area Transit Commission. The City, in conjunction with the Cities of Eden Prairie and Chaska, has agreed to establish the Southwest Area Transit Commission (the Commission). The purpose of the Commission is to provide alternative methods of public transit service to the three cities. The Commission’s board is composed of two commissioners from each of the cities. Western Area Fire Training Association (WAFTA). The City is a member of a joint powers group along with ten other communities. WAFTA operates a fire training facility in western Carver County. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT The Chanhassen Recreation Center is owned by Independent School District No. 112 and operates under a joint powers agreement between the City and the School District. The ninety-nine year agreement expires in 2093. According to the terms of the agreement, the City reimburses the School District 24% of the cost to operate and maintain the facility. B. GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental 43 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or business-type activity, are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business-type activity. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or business-type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business-type activity. Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds and proprietary funds. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund financial statements. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Reimbursement grants are considered available if they are collected within one year of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due. Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the City. 44 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 The City reports the following major governmental funds: General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Revolving Assessment Fund (601) accounts for the City’s annual street re-construction program. The individual property owner pays a portion of the cost of the annual project with assessments and the City funds its portion with the reserves created in this fund, an annual tax levy and franchise fees. TH101 Improvements – Pioneer to Flying Cloud (605) accounts for the funding sources and costs of the Trunk Highway 101 improvement project, which includes widening of the highway between Pioneer Trail and Flying Cloud Drive, sanitary sewer and water extension, storm sewer improvements, pedestrian/bicycle trails, and a pedestrian bridge. The City reports the following major proprietary funds: The Water Fund accounts for the water service charges which are used to finance the water system operating expenses. The Sewer Fund accounts for the sewer service charges which are used to finance the sanitary sewer system operating expenses. The Surface Water Management Fund accounts for the surface water charges which are used to finance the surface water system operating expenses. As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the government-wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions that would be treated as revenues, expenditures or expenses if they involved external organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu of taxes, are similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned. Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes. Proprietary Funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the water, sewer, and surface water management enterprise funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. 45 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 D. BUDGETS Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Annual appropriated budgets are adopted for the General Fund and for the Contribution, Cemetery, and CATV Special Revenue Funds. Budgeted amounts are reported as originally adopted, or as amended by the City Council. There were no budget amendments during 2020. Budgeted expenditure appropriations lapse at year end. Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and other commitments for the expenditure of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the appropriation, is not employed by the City because it is at present not considered necessary to assure effective budgetary control or to facilitate effective cash management. E. LEGAL COMPLIANCE - BUDGETS The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements: 1. The City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. 2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 3. The budget is legally enacted through passage of a resolution. 4. Management may authorize transfer of budgeted amounts between departments within any fund. All budget amendments between funds must be approved by the City Council. The legal level of budgetary control is at the fund level. Budgetary monitoring, by departments or divisions and by category, is required by City policy. 5. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year for the General Fund and for the Contribution, Cemetery and CATV Special Revenue Funds. Formal budgetary integration is not employed for Debt Service Funds because effective budgetary control is alternatively achieved through general obligation bond indenture provisions. Budgetary control for Capital Projects Funds is accomplished through the use of project controls. The following is a listing of funds whose expenditures exceeded budgeted appropriations: Budgeted Expenditures Actual Expenditures Expenditures Over Budget Cemetery Fund $2,000 $3,563 $1,563 F. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Cash and investment balances from all funds are pooled and invested to the extent available in authorized investments. Investments are stated at fair value. Investment income is accrued at the balance sheet date and allocated to individual funds on the basis of the fund's equity in the cash and investment pool. 46 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Proprietary Funds consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. All of the cash and investments allocated to the Proprietary Fund types have original maturities of 90 days or less. Therefore, the entire balance in such fund types is considered cash equivalents. G. RECEIVABLES Property taxes and special assessment receivables have been reported net of estimated uncollectible accounts (See Note 1 H and I). Because utility bills are considered liens on property, no estimated uncollectible amounts are established. Uncollectible amounts are not material for other receivables and have not been reported. H. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RECOGNITION The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in December (levy/assessment date) of each year for collection in the following year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for itself, the City, the local School District and other taxing authorities. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date. Real property taxes are payable (by property owners) on May 15 and October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are payable by taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of each year. These taxes are collected by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 15 and December 15 of the same year. Delinquent collections for November and December are received the following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes by property owners. The County possesses this authority. GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes property tax revenue in the period for which taxes were levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported. GOVERNMENT FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current and delinquent taxes and State credits received by the City in July, December and January are recognized as revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and taxes and credits not received at year end are classified as delinquent and due from County taxes receivable. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected by the City in January are fully offset by deferred inflows of resources because they are not available to finance current expenditures. The City's property tax revenue includes payments from the Metropolitan Revenue Distribution (Fiscal Disparities Formula) per State Statute 473F. This statute provides a means of spreading a portion of the taxable valuation of commercial/industrial real property to various taxing authorities within the defined metropolitan area. The valuation "shared" is a portion of commercial/industrial property valuation growth since 1971. 47 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 I. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION Special assessments are levied against benefited properties for the cost or a portion of the cost of special assessment improvement projects in accordance with State Statutes. These assessments are collectible by the City over a term of years usually consistent with the term of the related bond issue. Collection of annual installments (including interest) is handled by the County Auditor in the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do) prepay future installments without interest or prepayment penalties. Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is determined to be excessive by the City Council or court action. If special assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeit sale and the first proceeds of that sale (after costs, penalties and expenses of sale) are remitted to the City in payment of delinquent special assessments. Generally, the City will collect the full amount of its special assessments not adjusted by City Council or court action. Pursuant to State Statutes, a property shall be subject to a tax forfeit sale after three years unless it is homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational land in which event the property is subject to such sale after five years. GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The City recognizes special assessment revenue in the period that the assessment roll was adopted by the City Council. Uncollectible special assessments are not material and have not been reported. GOVERNMENT FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Revenue from special assessments is recognized by the City when it becomes measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In practice, current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are recognized as revenue for the current year. Special assessments are collected by the County and remitted by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining delinquent, deferred and special deferred assessments receivable in governmental funds are completely offset by deferred inflows of resources. J. INVENTORIES GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The original cost of materials and supplies are recorded as expenditures at the time of purchase. These funds do not maintain material amounts of inventories. PROPRIETARY FUNDS Inventories of the Proprietary Funds are stated at cost, which approximates market, using the first-in, first- out (FIFO) method. 48 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 K. PREPAID ITEMS Certain prepayments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements. Prepaid items are reported using the consumption method and recorded as expenditures/expenses at the time of consumption. L. CAPITAL ASSETS Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, trails, sidewalks, and similar items), and intangible assets such as easements and computer software, are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the City as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $10,000 and an estimated useful life in excess of one year. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at acquisition value at the date of donation. In the case of the initial capitalization of general infrastructure assets, the City chose to include all such items regardless of their acquisition date amount. These assets are reported at historical or estimated historical cost, using the 1987 base highway construction price trend, when historical costs were unavailable. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed. In accordance with GASB 89, which the City early implemented for the year ended December 31, 2018, interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets of business-type activities is recognized as an expense in the period in which the cost is incurred. Capital assets of the City are depreciated/amortized using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: Buildings and structures 20 –50 years Machinery and equipment (including software) 3 –30 years Drainage systems 30 years Water and sewer lines 30 years Streets 25 –50 years Trails 15 years Sidewalks 25 years Other improvements 7 –40 years Temporary easements 2 years M. COMPENSATED ABSENCES The City compensates all employees upon termination for unused vacation and unused sick time up to a maximum based upon length of service. The City compensates nonexempt employees for unused comp time. All vacation pay and comp time is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and proprietary 49 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations and retirements. In accordance with the provisions of GASB Statement No. 16, Accounting for Compensated Absences, no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulating rights to receive sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized for that portion of accumulating sick leave benefits that is vested as severance pay. N. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS In the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts, if material, are amortized over the life of the related debt. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. O. DEFERRED OUTFLOWS/INFLOWS OF RESOURCES In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents a consumption of net position that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The government has one item that qualifies for reporting in the category. It is the pension related deferred outflows of resources reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Position and the proprietary funds Statement of Net Position. In addition to liabilities, the statement of financial position reports a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element represents an acquisition of net position that applies to future periods, and therefore, will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The government has pension related deferred inflows of resources reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Pension and the proprietary funds Statements of Net Position. The government also has an item, which arises only under a modified accrual basis of accounting, that qualifies for reporting in this category. Accordingly, the item, unavailable revenue, is reported only in the governmental fund balance sheet. The governmental funds report unavailable revenues from the following sources: property taxes, special assessments and other revenue not collected within 60 days from year-end. P. FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATIONS In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These classifications are as follows: Nonspendable - consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items. Restricted - consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. 50 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Committed - consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints are established by Resolution of City Council, and committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by resolution. Assigned - consists of internally imposed constraints for the specific purpose of the City’s intended use. Pursuant to the City’s Fund Balance Policy, the City Manager or Finance Director are authorized to assign fund balance that reflects the City’s intended use of those funds. Unassigned - is the residual classification for the General Fund and also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed 2) assigned and 3) unassigned. The exception to this is the Park Acquisition and Development Fund (410), where it is the City’s policy to use resources in the following order: 1) assigned, 2) committed, and 3) restricted. Q. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds for goods provided or services rendered. Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for expenditures/expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures/expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of expenditures/expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash balances by means of an advance from another fund. Short-term interfund loans are classified as “due to/from other funds.” Long- term interfund loans are classified as “interfund loan receivable/payable.” Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-wide financial statements as “internal balances.” All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers. R. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates that affect amounts reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates. S. COMPARATIVE TOTALS The basic financial statements, required supplementary information, and combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules include certain prior-year summarized comparative information in total but not at the level of detail required for a presentation in conformity with generally accepted accounting 51 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 principles. Accordingly, such information should be read in conjunction with the government’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, from which the summarized information was derived. T. PENSION PLANS COST SHARING MULTIPLE – EMPLOYER PLANS For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows and inflows of resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and additions to and deductions from PERA’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by PERA, except that PERA’s fiscal year end is June 30. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. SINGLE EMPLOYER PLAN For purposes of measuring the net pension liability (asset), deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association (Relief) and additions to/deductions from the Relief’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they were reported by the Relief. For this purpose, benefit payments are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. 52 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 U. RECONCILIATION OF GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The governmental fund balance sheet includes a reconciliation between fund balances – total governmental funds and net position – governmental activities as reported in the government-wide statement of net position. One element of that reconciliation explains that “long-term liabilities, including pension related deferred outflows and inflows, are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not reported in the funds.” The details of this ($10,174,784) difference are as follows: Bonds payable ($4,130,000) Unamortized bond premium (159,848) Project financing (546,108) Accrued interest payable (40,708) Compensated absences payable (682,281) Other post employment benefits payable (125,320) Net pension liability (4,413,045) Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions 626,821 Deferred inflows of resources related to pensions (660,004) Deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB 12,038 Deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB (56,329) Net adjustment to decrease fund balances - total governmental funds to arrive at net position - governmental activities ($10,174,784) V. RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain amounts presented in the prior year data have been reclassified in order to be consistent with current year’s presentation. Note 2 DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS A. DEPOSITS In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at those depository banks authorized by the City Council, all of which are members of the Federal Reserve System. Custodial Credit Risk – Custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City’s deposits may not be returned to it. Minnesota Statutes require that insurance, surety bonds or collateral protect all City deposits. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of deposits not covered by insurance or bonds. The City has no additional deposit policies addressing custodial credit risk. As of December 31, 2020, the bank balance of the City’s deposits was insured by the FDIC or covered by pledged collateral held in the City’s name. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping by the City Treasurer or in a financial institution other than that furnishing the collateral. Minnesota Statute 118.A.03 identifies allowable forms of collateral. 53 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 At December 31, 2020, the carrying amount of the City’s deposits with financial institutions was $991,139. B. INVESTMENTS Minnesota Subject to rating, yield, maturity and issuer requirements as prescribed by statue, Minnesota Statutes 118A.04 and 118A.05 authorized the City to invest in United States securities, state and local securities, commercial paper, time deposits, high-risk mortgage-backed securities, temporary general obligation bonds, repurchase agreements, Minnesota joint powers investment trust and guaranteed investment contracts. As of December 31, 2020, the City had the following investments and maturities: Fair Less Investment Type Rating Value Than 1 1-5 6-10 Money Market NR $11,693,192 $11,693,192 $ - $ - Brokered Certificates of Deposit NR 4,521,748 2,746,256 1,775,492 - Municipal Bonds (1)12,199,657 4,264,968 7,547,741 386,948 Federal National Mortgage Assn. Notes Aaa 502,685 502,685 - - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes Aaa 999,187 - 999,187 - Federal Home Loan Bank Notes Aaa 2,298,208 1,264,503 1,033,705 - Federal Farm Credit Bank Aaa 3,584,050 1,004,123 2,003,642 576,285 Total $35,798,727 $21,475,727 $13,359,767 $963,233 (1) $1,021,170 are rated Aaa, $7,246,705 are rated AAA,Total investments $35,798,727 $2,408,548 are rated AA+, and $1,523,234 are rated AA.Deposits 991,139 Petty cash 635 Total cash and investments $36,790,501 NR - Not Rated Classifications above are by maturity date. Some investments listed above have call dates that occur in less than one year. Investment Maturities (in Years) The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. The hierarchy has three levels. Level 1 investments are valued using inputs that are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 investments are valued using inputs that are based on quoted prices for similar assets or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 investments are valued using inputs that are unobservable. 54 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 The City has the following recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2020: Investment Type 12/31/2020 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Investments at fair value: Brokered Certificates of Deposit $4,521,748 $ - $4,521,748 $ - Municipal Bonds 12,199,657 - 12,199,657 - Federal National Mortgage Assn. Notes 502,685 - 502,685 - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes 999,187 - 999,187 - Federal Home Loan Bank Notes 2,298,208 - 2,298,208 - Federal Farm Credit Bank 3,584,050 - 3,584,050 - Total/subtotal 24,105,535 $0 $24,105,535 $0 Investments not categorized: Money Market 11,693,192 Total $35,798,727 Fair Value Measurement Using Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows: Cash and investments: Governmental and business-type (Statement 1) $31,132,561 Restricted cash (Statement 1) 5,657,940 Total $36,790,501 C. INVESTMENT RISKS Custodial credit risk – investments – For investments in securities, custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of failure of the counterparty to a transaction, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investment securities that are in the possession of an outside party. Investments in investment pools and money markets are not evidenced by securities that exist in physical or book entry form, and therefore are not subject to custodial credit risk disclosures. The City’s investment policy requires the City’s security broker/dealers to provide its audited financial statements, proof of NASD certification, proof of state registration, and certification of having read, understood and agreed to comply with the City’s investment policy. Investments in securities are held by the City’s broker-dealer of which $500,000 per broker is insured through SIPC. Each broker-dealer has provided additional protection by providing additional insurance. This insurance is subject to aggregate limits applied to all of the broker-dealer’s accounts. Interest rate risk – Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in interest rates of debt investments could adversely affect the fair value of an investment. The City’s investment policy requires the City to diversify its investment portfolio to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from over concentration of assets in a specific maturity. The policy also states the City’s investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonable, i.e., not investing in maturities longer than seven years. Credit risk – Credit risk is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will be unable to fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. State law limits investments to commercial paper to those rated in the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies; in any security of the State of Minnesota or any of its municipalities which is rated “A” or better by a national bond rating service for general obligation and rated “AA” or better for a revenue obligation; a general obligation of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency to those rated “A” or better by a national bond rating 55 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 agency; mutual funds or money market funds whose investments are restricted to securities described in MS 118A.04. The City’s investment policy does not place further restrictions on investment options. Concentration of credit risk – Concentration of credit risk is the risk of loss that may be attributed to the magnitude of a government’s investment in a single issuer. The City’s investment policy states investments shall be diversified by limiting investments to avoid over concentration in securities from a specific issuer or business sector (excluding U.S. Treasury securities). Investments in a single issuer exceeding 5% of the City’s overall investment portfolio are in various holdings as follows: Federal Home Loan Bank Notes 6% Federal Farm Credit Bank 10% Note 3 RECEIVABLES Significant receivable balances not expected to be collected within one year of December 31, 2020 are as follows: Interfund Delinquent Special Loan Property Assessments Receivable Taxes Receivable Total Major Funds: General $ - $35,652 $ - $35,652 Revolving Assessment Fund - - 861,081 861,081 Water - - 30,143 30,143 Sewer - - 11 11 Nonmajor Funds 375,369 - 319,222 694,591 $375,369 $35,652 $1,210,457 $1,621,478 56 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Note 4 UNAVAILABLE REVENUE Governmental funds report deferred inflows of resources in connection with receivables of revenues that are not considered to be available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. At December 31 2020, the various components of unavailable revenue were as follows: Revolving General Assessment Nonmajor Fund Fund Funds Total Delinquent property taxes receivable $87,260 $ - $ - $87,260 Special assessments not yet due - 1,083,394 319,528 1,402,922 Total unavailable revenue $87,260 $1,083,394 $319,528 $1,490,182 Major Funds 57 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Note 5 CAPITAL ASSETS Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2020 was as follows: Beginning Ending Primary Government Balance Increase Decrease Balance Governmental activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $19,912,318 $ - $ - $19,912,318 Construction in progress 1,491,353 729,738 (1,403,788) 817,303 Permanent easements 1,749,556 272,300 - 2,021,856 Total capital assets not being depreciated 23,153,227 1,002,038 (1,403,788) 22,751,477 Capital assets being depreciated: Buildings and structures 23,411,160 1,468,155 (66,500) 24,812,815 Machinery and equipment 9,990,718 609,862 (575,167) 10,025,413 Other improvements 9,392,396 174,141 (111,123) 9,455,414 Infrastructure 122,125,843 1,899,993 (234,627) 123,791,209 Temporary easements 3,436,870 1,325,383 - 4,762,253 Total capital assets being depreciated 168,356,987 5,477,534 (987,417) 172,847,104 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and structures 9,541,253 568,502 (26,600) 10,083,155 Machinery and equipment 6,100,050 523,917 (460,173) 6,163,794 Other improvements 4,540,881 398,074 (93,311) 4,845,644 Infrastructure 91,966,549 3,194,389 (234,627) 94,926,311 Temporary easements 390,031 1,721,012 - 2,111,043 Total accumulated depreciation 112,538,764 6,405,894 (814,711) 118,129,947 Governmental activities capital assets - net $78,971,450 $73,678 ($1,576,494) $77,468,634 Beginning Ending Primary Government Balance Increase Decrease Balance Business-type activities: Capital assets not being depreciated: Land $2,104,535 $4,200 $ - $2,108,735 Construction in progress 1,238,374 2,475,298 (904,493) 2,809,179 Permanent easements 2,117,722 672,850 - 2,790,572 Total capital assets not being depreciated 5,460,631 3,152,348 (904,493) 7,708,486 Capital assets being depreciated: Buildings and structures 28,077,579 - - 28,077,579 Machinery and equipment 2,031,661 163,302 (189,529) 2,005,434 Other improvements 118,697,979 1,835,779 (80,557) 120,453,201 Total capital assets being depreciated 148,807,219 1,999,081 (270,086) 150,536,214 Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings and structures 3,299,195 561,611 - 3,860,806 Machinery and equipment 1,070,641 151,470 (109,813) 1,112,298 Other improvements 72,714,093 3,121,292 (79,600) 75,755,785 Total accumulated depreciation 77,083,929 3,834,373 (189,413) 80,728,889 Business-type activities capital assets - net 77,183,921 1,317,056 (985,166) 77,515,811 Total capital assets - net $156,155,371 $1,390,734 ($2,561,660) $154,984,445 58 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the City as follows: Governmental activities: General government $272,751 Public safety 216,514 Public works 5,033,821 Parks and recreation 882,808 Total depreciation expense - governmental activities $6,405,894 Business-type activities: Water $1,935,991 Sewer 942,382 Surface water management 956,000 Total depreciation expense - business-type activities $3,834,373 Note 6 CITY INDEBTEDNESS The City issues long-term debt to provide funds for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities. The City’s long-term debt is segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be repaid from business-type activities. GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES As of December 31, 2020, the governmental activities long-term debt of the City consisted of the following: Final Authorized Issue Maturity Interest And Outstanding Date Date Rate Issued 12/31/2020 General Long-Term Debt: General Obligation Bonds: G.O. Bonds, Series 2016A 3/3/2016 2/1/2030 2.00% - 3.00% 4,805,000 4,130,000 Bond premium 239,773 159,848 Total general obligation bonds 5,044,773 4,289,848 Project financing N/A 546,108 Compensated absences payable N/A 682,281 Total City indebtedness - governmental activities $5,044,773 $5,518,237 59 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES As of December 31, 2020, the business-type activities long-term debt of the City consisted of the following: Final Authorized Issue Maturity Interest And Outstanding Date Date Rate Issued 12/31/2020 G.O. Revenue Bonds: Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 10/6/2011 2/1/2022 0.30% - 2.15%$5,920,000 $1,000,000 Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2011B 10/6/2011 2/1/2025 2.00% - 3.00%3,720,000 2,680,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 11/15/2012 2/1/2023 1.00% - 1.55% 1,245,000 395,000 Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 3/3/2016 2/1/2026 2.00% - 3.00% 1,565,000 990,000 Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2016B 12/29/2016 2/1/2042 3.50% - 4.00% 3,630,000 3,630,000 Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 2/1/2017 2/1/2038 2.00% - 4.00% 10,000,000 9,300,000 Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2018A 3/15/2018 2/1/2030 3.00% - 4.00%3,595,000 3,070,000 Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A 4/2/2020 2/1/2031 2.00% - 3.00% 6,220,000 6,220,000 Bond premium 1,626,772 1,250,932 Total G.O. revenue bonds 37,521,772 28,535,932 Compensated absences payable N/A 205,033 Total City indebtedness - business-type activities $37,521,772 $28,740,965 GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Annual debt service requirements to maturity for the governmental activities long-term debt are as follows: Year Ending December 31, Principal Interest 2021 $360,000 $92,300 2022 370,000 81,350 2023 385,000 70,025 2024 395,000 58,325 2025 410,000 48,300 2026 420,000 40,000 2027 430,000 31,500 2028 440,000 22,800 2029 455,000 13,850 2030 465,000 4,650 Total $4,130,000 $463,100 General Obligation Bonds It is not practicable to determine the specific year for payment of long-term accrued compensated absences. 60 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES Annual debt service requirements to maturity for the business-type long-term debt are as follows: Year Ending G.O. Revenue Bonds December 31, Principal Interest 2021 $2,105,000 $853,383 2022 2,060,000 742,422 2023 1,845,000 685,634 2024 1,755,000 631,013 2025 1,810,000 576,763 2026 1,275,000 530,538 2027 1,550,000 488,188 2028 1,600,000 440,938 2029 1,650,000 395,563 2030 1,690,000 352,263 2031 1,150,000 315,488 2032 690,000 290,288 2033 715,000 269,213 2034 735,000 247,463 2035 755,000 225,113 2036 780,000 202,088 2037 800,000 176,388 2038 830,000 147,863 2039 825,000 118,900 2040 855,000 88,431 2041 885,000 54,700 2042 925,000 18,500 Total $27,285,000 $7,851,140 It is not practicable to determine the specific year for payment of long-term accrued compensated absences. 61 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 CHANGE IN LONG-TERM LIABILITIES Long-term liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2020 was as follows: Beginning Ending Due Within Balance Additions Deletions Balance One Year Governmental activities: General obligation bonds $5,715,000 $ - ($1,585,000) $4,130,000 $360,000 Bond premium 175,833 - (15,985) 159,848 - Project financing - 546,108 - 546,108 - Compensated absences 682,952 581,552 (582,223) 682,281 106,820 Total governmental activity long-term liabilities $6,573,785 $1,127,660 ($2,183,208) $5,518,237 $466,820 Business-type activities: G.O. revenue bonds $22,935,000 $6,220,000 ($1,870,000) $27,285,000 $2,105,000 Bond premium 820,499 548,274 (117,841) 1,250,932 - Compensated absences 192,075 178,054 (165,096) 205,033 32,101 Total business-type activity long-term liabilities $23,947,574 $6,946,328 ($2,152,937) $28,740,965 $2,137,101 For the governmental activities, compensated absences are generally liquidated by the General and Special Revenue Funds. All long-term bonded indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2020 is backed by the full faith and credit of the City. General Obligation Revenue Bonds are serviced by the Sewer, Water and Surface Water Management Enterprise Funds and are carried as debt of those funds. Other bonds are supported by various Debt Service Funds. NONEXCHANGE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE OF DEBT On August 1, 2014 the Carver County Community Development Agency, a legally separate entity from the City, issued $2,110,000 of Housing Development Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 and $2,370,000 of Taxable Housing Development and Refunding Bonds, Series 2014T. The proceeds were used to refund a portion of prior bonds and to fund certain capital improvements of the Centennial Hill Apartments, which are located within the City. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.034, Subd. 2, the City has pledged its full faith and credit and taxing powers to the payment of debt service on the Series 2014 and Series 2014T bonds. In the event that the Carver County Community Development Agency is unable to pay the debt service on the bonds due to insufficient housing revenues and cash reserves, the City is obligated to pay the debt service. The City’s guarantee extends until the bonds have fully matured, which is scheduled to occur in 2034. The total amount of outstanding guaranteed debt, including interest, at December 31, 2020 is $4,396,145. The City’s management does not expect the City will be required to make any debt service payments towards these bonds. Accordingly, the bonds are not reflected in the financial statements of the City. 62 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 PROJECT FINANCING The City has a Joint Powers Agreement with Carver County for the Lyman Boulevard- Phase 3 project. The County is administering the project. The City’s expected share of project costs is $2,191,108. The City is paying their share over the next five years at 0% interest. The payment due in 2021 is presented as due to other governments in the Revolving Assessment Fund. Payments due in greater than one year are presented as long-term debt. The payment schedule is as follows: Year Ending December 31, Payment 2021 $1,645,000 2022 145,000 2023 145,000 2024 145,000 2025 111,108 Total $2,191,108 63 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 REVENUE PLEDGED Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows: Percent of Debt service Remaining Principal Pledged Use of Total as a % of Term of Principal and Interest Revenue Bond Issue Proceeds Type Debt Service net revenues Pledge and Interest Paid Received 2016A Refunding bonds Refunding of 2008A bonds Property taxes 100%n/a 2019 - 2030 $4,593,100 $447,875 $480,600 2011A Water Revenue bonds Water infrastructure improvements Water charges 100%17.9% 2012 - 2021 $1,016,119 $731,758 $4,096,743 - refunded the 2005B bonds 2011B Water Revenue bonds Water infrastructure improvements Water charges 100%13.9% 2012 - 2024 $2,886,700 $567,600 $4,096,743 - refunded the 2005B bonds 2012A Water & Sewer Revenue Purchase of meter reading equipment Water and 100%1.8% 2013 - 2022 $403,806 $131,321 $7,308,854 bonds sewer charges 2016A Water Revenue bonds Water infrastructure improvements Water charges 100%5.1% 2016 - 2025 $1,063,775 $178,500 $3,529,910 2016B Water Revenue bonds West Water Treatment Plant Water charges 100%3.4% 2017 - 2041 $6,396,365 $138,238 $4,096,743 2017A Water Revenue bonds West Water Treatment Plant Water charges 100%10.8% 2018 - 2038 $12,605,350 $441,400 $4,096,743 2018A Water Revenue bonds West Water Treatment Plant Water charges 100%8.8% 2019 - 2030 $3,557,575 $358,750 $4,096,743 2020A Water, Sewer, & Surface Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Water, sewer, and 100%n/a 2021 - 2031 $7,206,449 $ - $8,389,452 Water Revenue bonds Infrastructure improvements surface water charges Current YearRevenue Pledged Note 7 DEFERRED AD VALOREM TAX LEVIES - BONDED DEBT General obligation bond issues sold by the City are financed by ad valorem tax levies. Special assessment bond issues sold by the City are partially financed by ad valorem tax levies in addition to special assessments levied against the benefiting properties. When a bond issue to be financed partially or completely by ad valorem tax levies is sold, specific annual amounts of such tax levies are stated in the bond resolution and the County Auditor is notified and instructed to levy these taxes over the appropriate years. The future tax levies are subject to cancellation when and if the City has provided alternative sources of financing. The City Council is required to levy any additional taxes found necessary for full payment of principal and interest. These future scheduled tax levies are not shown as assets in the accompanying financial statements at December 31, 2020. Future scheduled tax levies for all bonds outstanding at December 31, 2020 totaled $4,393,463. 64 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Note 8 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS A. PLAN DESCRIPTION The City participates in the following cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. 1. General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) All full-time (with the exception of employees covered by PEPFF) and certain part-time employees of the City are covered by the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF). GERF members belong to the Coordinated Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security. 2. Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) The PEPFF, originally established for police officers and firefighters not covered by a local relief association, now covers all police officers and firefighters hired since 1980. Effective July 1, 1999, the PEPFF also covers police officers and firefighters belonging to local relief associations that elected to merge with and transfer assets and administration to PERA. B. BENEFITS PROVIDED PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state statute and can only be modified by the state Legislature. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. 1. GERF Benefits Benefits are based on a member’s highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERA’s Coordinated members. Members hired prior to July 1, 1989 receive the higher of Method 1 or Method 2 formulas. Only Method 2 is used for members hired after June 30, 1989. Under Method 1, the accrual rate for Coordinated members is 1.2% of average salary for each of the first ten years of service and 1.7% of average salary for each additional year. Under Method 2, the accrual rate for Coordinated Plan members is 1.7% of average salary for all years of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989 a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66. Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Beginning in 2019, the postretirement increase is equal to 50% of the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) announced by the SSA, with a minimum increase of at least 1% and a maximum of 1.5%. Recipients that have been receiving the annuity or benefit for at least a full year as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive the full increase. For recipients receiving the annuity or benefit for at least one month but less than a full year as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive a reduced prorated increase. For members retiring on January 1, 2024 or later, the increase will be delayed until normal retirement age (age 65 if hired 65 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 prior to July 1, 1989, or age 66 for individuals hired on or after July 1, 1989). Members retiring under Rule of 90 are exempt from the delay to normal retirement. 2. PEPFF Benefits Benefits for the PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2010 but before July 1, 2014 vest on a prorated basis from 50% after five years up to 100% after ten years of credited service. Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2014 vest on a prorated basis from 50% after ten years up to 100% after twenty years of credited service. The annuity accrual rate is 3% of average salary for each year of service. For PEPFF members who were first hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal at least 90. Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Beginning in 2019, the postretirement increase will be fixed at 1%. Recipients that have been receiving the annuity or benefit for at least 36 months as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive the full increase. For recipients receiving the annuity or benefit for at least 25 months but less than 36 months as of the June 30 before the effective date of the increase will receive a reduced prorated increase. C. CONTRIBUTIONS Minnesota Statutes Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the state legislature. 1. GERF Contributions Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 6.5% of their annual covered salary in fiscal year 2020 and the City was required to contribute 7.5% for Coordinated Plan members. The City’s contributions to the GERF for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $409,847. The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. 2. PEPFF Contributions Police and Fire member’s contribution rates increased from 11.3% of pay to 11.8% and employer rates increased from 16.95% to 17.70% on January 1, 2020. The City’s contributions to the PEPFF for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $40,530. The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute. 66 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 D. PENSION COSTS 1. GERF Pension Costs At December 31, 2020, the City reported a liability of $4,442,634 for its proportionate share of GERF’s net pension liability. The City’s net pension liability reflected a reduction due to the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $16 million. The State of Minnesota is considered a non-employer contributing entity and the state’s contribution meets the definition of a special funding situation. The State of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net pension liability associated with the City totaled $137,022. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2020, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of PERA’s participating employers. The City’s proportionate share was 0.0741% at the end of the measurement period and 0.0727% for the beginning of the period. City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability $4,442,634 State of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net pension liability associated with the City 137,022 Total $4,579,656 For the year ended December 31, 2020, the City recognized pension expense of $168,716 for its proportionate share of the GERF’s pension expense. In addition, the City recognized an additional $11,925 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $16 million to the GERF. At December 31, 2020, the City reported its proportionate share of the GERF’s deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual economic experience $40,521 $16,809 Changes in actuarial assumptions - 165,164 Difference between projected and actual investment earnings 74,856 - Changes in proportion 69,513 96,217 Contributions paid to PERA subsequent to the measurement date 207,521 - Total $392,411 $278,190 67 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 The $207,521 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from City contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ending December 31, 2021. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Year Ended Pension December 31,Expense 2021 (270,831) 2022 (33,535) 2023 103,731 2024 107,335 Thereafter - (93,300) 2. PEPFF Pension Costs At December 31, 2020, the City reported a liability of $263,621 for its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2020 and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of PERA’s participating employers. The City’s proportionate share was 0.0200% at the end of the measurement period and 0.0205% for the beginning of the period. The State of Minnesota also contributed $13.5 million to PEPFF during the plan fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. The contribution consisted of $4.5 million in direct state aid that does meet the definition of a special funding situation and $9.0 million in fire state aid that does not meet the definition of a special funding situation. The $4.5 million direct state was paid on October 1, 2019. Thereafter, by October 1 of each year, the state will pay $9 million to the Police and Fire Fund until full funding is reached or July 1, 2048, whichever is earlier. The $9 million in fire state aid will continue until the fund is 90 percent funded, or until the State Patrol Plan (administered by the Minnesota State Retirement System) is 90 percent funded, whichever occurs later. As a result, the State of Minnesota is included as a non-employer contributing entity in the PEPFF Schedule of Employer Allocations and Schedule of Pension Amounts by Employer, Current Reporting Period Only (pension allocation schedules) for the $4.5 million in direct state aid. PEPFF employers need to recognize their proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s pension expense (and grant revenue) under GASB 68 special funding situation accounting and financial reporting requirements. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the City recognized pension expense of $43,707 for its proportionate share of the Police and Fire Plan’s pension expense. In addition, the City recognized an additional $1,913 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $4.5 million to the PEPFF. The State of Minnesota is not included as a non-employer contributing entity in the Police and Fire Pension Plan pension allocation schedules for the $9 million in fire state aid. The City also recognized 68 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 $1,913 for the year ended December 31, 2020 as revenue and an offsetting reduction of net pension liability for its proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s on-behalf contributions to the Police and Fire Fund. At December 31, 2020, the City reported its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual economic experience $11,631 $12,597 Changes in actuarial assumptions 88,897 164,129 Net collective between projected and actual investment earnings 8,267 - Changes in proportion 22,811 17,001 Contributions paid to PERA subsequent to the measurement date 20,378 - Total $151,984 $193,727 The $20,378 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from City contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ending December 31, 2021. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as outflows: Year Ended Pension December 31,Expense 2021 (19,257) 2022 (72,416) 2023 17,372 2024 12,874 2025 (694) Thereafter - (62,120) The net pension liability will be liquidated by the general, water, sewer, and surface water management funds. 69 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 E. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS The total pension liability in the June 30, 2020 actuarial valuation was determined using an individual entry-age normal actuarial cost method and the following actuarial assumptions: Inflation 2.50% per year Salary Growth 3.25% per year Investment Rate of Return 7.50% Salary increases were based on a service-related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, survivors, and disabilitants for all plans were based on RP 2014 tables for males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments to fit PERA’s experience. Cost of living benefit increases after retirement for retirees are assumed to be 1.25% per year for GERF and 1.0% per year for PEPFF. Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2020 valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience study for GERF was completed in 2019. The assumption changes were adopted by the Board and become effective with the July 1, 2020 actuarial valuation. The most recent four-year experience study for PEPFF was completed in 2020. The following changes in actuarial assumptions and plan provisions occurred in 2020: General Employees Fund Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The price inflation assumption was decreased from 2.50% to 2.25%.  The payroll growth assumption was decreased from 3.25% to 3.00%.  As recommended in the June 30, 2019 experience study, assumed salary increase rates were decreased 0.25% and assumed rates of retirement were changed resulting in more unreduced (normal) retirements and slightly fewer Rule of 90 and early retirements. Assumed rates of termination and disability were also changed.  The base mortality tables were changed from RP-2014 tables to Pub-2010 tables, with adjustments.  The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2018 to Scale MP-2019.  The assumed spouse age difference was changed from two years older for females to one year older.  The assumed number of married male new retirees electing the 100% Joint & Survivor option changed from 35% to 45%. The assumed number of married female new retirees electing the 100% Joint & Survivor option changed from 15% to 30%. The corresponding number of married new retirees electing the Life annuity option was adjusted accordingly. Changes in Plan Provisions:  Augmentation for current privatized members was reduced to 2.0% for the period July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023 and 0.0% after. Augmentation was eliminated for privatizations occurring after June 30, 2020. 70 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Police and Fire Fund Changes in Actuarial Assumptions  The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2018 to MP-2019. The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of PERA, prepares an analysis of the reasonableness on a regular basis of the long-term expected rate of return using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of geometric real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: Target Long-Term Expected Asset Class Allocation Real Rate of Return Domestic Stock 35.5% 5.10% International Stock 17.5% 5.30% Bonds (Fixed Income) 20% 0.75% Alternative Assets (Private Markets) 25% 5.90% Cash 2% 0.00% Total 100% F. DISCOUNT RATE The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2020 was 7.5%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members and employers will be made at the rate set in Minnesota statutes. Based on that assumption, the fiduciary net position of the GERF and the PEPFF was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. G. PENSION LIABILITY SENSITIVITY The following presents the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for all plans it participates in, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well as what the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than the current discount rate: 1% Decrease in 1% Increase in Discount Rate (6.5%) Discount Rate (7.5%) Discount Rate (8.5%) City's Proportionate share of the GERF net pension liability $7,120,001 $4,442,634 $2,234,021 City's Proportionate share of the PEPFF net pension liability $525,435 $263,621 $47,016 71 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 H. PENSION PLAN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in a separately-issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information. That report may be obtained at www.mnpera.org. I. PENSION EXPENSE Pension expense recognized by the City for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 is as follows: GERF $168,176 PEPFF 43,707 Fire Relief (note 9)183,852 Total $395,735 Note 9 SINGLE EMPLOYER PENSION PLAN A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association (the Relief Association) and additions to/deductions from the Relief Association’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they were reported by the Relief Association. For this purpose, benefit payments are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. B. PLAN DESCRIPTION All members of the Chanhassen Fire Department are covered by a defined benefit pension plan administered by the Relief Association. The Plan is a single employer retirement plan and is established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Chapter 69. C. BENEFITS PROVIDED Twenty Year Service Pension Prior to April 1997, each member who is at least 50 years of age, has retired from the Fire Department, has served at least twenty years of active service with such department before retirement, and has been a member of the Relief Association in good standing at least ten years prior to such retirement shall be entitled to receive either a monthly lifetime service pension or a defined benefit lump sum pension. After April 1997, each member shall be entitled to receive a defined benefit lump sum pension. 72 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Monthly service pensions shall be $410 per month. Defined benefit service pension per year of service shall be $6,800. The maximum service pension shall not exceed the maximum service pension amount permitted under the flexible service pension maximums pursuant to Minnesota Section 424A.02, Subdivision 3. Members who choose the lump sum receive no additional interest accrual. Ten Year Service But Less Than Twenty Year Service Each member who is at least 50 years of age; who has retired from the Fire Department; who has served at least five years of active service with such department before retirement but has not served at least 20 years of active service; and, who has been a member of the Relief Association in good standing at least ten years prior to such retirement, shall be entitled to either a pro-rated monthly service pension or a pro-rated lump sum service pension based on the percentages in the following table: For Duty of: more than but less than 5 years 6 years 40% 6744 7848 8952 91056 10 11 60 11 12 64 12 13 68 13 14 72 14 15 76 15 16 80 16 17 84 17 18 88 18 19 92 19 20 96 20 100 The payment amount will be calculated by using the amount payable per year of service in effect at the time of such early retirement, multiplied by the number of accumulated years of service, multiplied by the appropriate percentage as defined above. During the time a member is on early-vested pension, he or she will not be eligible for disability benefits. Survivors Benefit Prior to April 1997, if any active vested or deferred member dies leaving an eligible surviving spouse, they shall receive a monthly pension for a guaranteed fifteen year period. After April 1997, an eligible surviving spouse shall receive a lump sum payment calculated in accordance with the by-laws. If there is no surviving spouse, then the deceased member’s designated beneficiary or their estate would receive the payment. A surviving spouse of a member receiving a monthly pension shall receive 50% of the member’s monthly benefit, based on the date of death. 73 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Permanent Disability Any member of the Relief Association contracting sickness or injury, incapacitating the member from attending to their business, from causes outside or within their line of duty, and a physician’s report shows that that member is unable to perform their duties, they are entitled to their full accrued lump sum benefit, payable immediately. Temporary Disability Any member of the Relief Association who becomes temporarily incapacitated from attending to their business due to illness of injury, sustained in the performance of such business, and is unable to work for a period of one week or longer, shall be paid a benefit of $5 per day for a period of no longer than 120 days in any one fiscal year, providing the member is under the care of a physician or doctor during this period. Death Benefit Upon the death of any active or deferred member, the beneficiaries of the deceased member shall be paid a death benefit in an amount equivalent to the accrued service pension. D. EMPLOYEES COVERED BY BENEFIT TERMS At December 31, 2020, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms: Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits 4 Retired members entitled to benefits but have not received them 25 Active members: Fully vested (20 years or more) 3 Partially vested (5 years to 19 years) 18 Non-vested (less than 5 years)20 Total 70 E. CONTRIBUTIONS Minnesota Statutes Chapter 424A.092 specifies minimum support rates required on an annual basis. The minimum support rates from the municipality and from State Aid are determined as the amount required to meet the normal cost plus amortizing any existing prior service costs over a ten-year period. The significant actuarial assumptions used to compute the municipal support are not the same as those used to compute the accrued pension liability. The Relief Association is comprised of volunteers; therefore, there are no payroll expenditures (i.e., there are no covered payroll percentage calculations). Contributions totaling $235,495 ($203,495 from the State of Minnesota and $31,957 from the City) were made to the Relief Association in accordance with state statute requirements for the year ended December 31, 2020. 74 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 F. ACTUARIAL METHOD AND SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS The total pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of December 31, 2020 using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods in the measurement: Valuation date 12/31/2020 Measurement date (assets and funded status)12/31/2020 Actuarial cost method Entry Age Normal Amortization method Level dollar Closed 20-year period Asset valuation method Market Value Actuarial assumptions: Investment rate of return 5% Projected salary increases N/A Includes inflation at 3% Cost-of-living adjustments 3% Age of service retirement The later of the age 50 and 20 years of service Post-retirement benefit increases None Mortality assumptions were determined using the Pubs-2010 Mortality table projected generationally from 2010 with MP-2010 Mortality improvement scale. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These expected real rates of return are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. For each major asset class that is included in the pension plan’s target asset allocation as of December 31, 2020, these best estimates are summarized in the following table: Target Long-Term Expected Asset Class Allocation Real Rate of Return Stock and mutual funds 60% 5.2% Fixed income 30% 0.6% Other 5% 0.6% Cash 5% 0.0% 100% G. DISCOUNT RATES The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 5%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that plan member contributions will be made at the current contribution rate and that contributions will be made at rates equal to the difference between actuarially determined contribution rates and the member rate. Based on those assumptions, the pensions plans fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments to 75 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 current plan members. Therefore, the plan’s long-term expected return on plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. H. CHANGES IN THE NET PENSION LIABILITY Total Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Pension Liability Net Position Liability (a) (b) (a) - (b) Balance at December 31, 2019 $3,055,205 $2,499,867 $555,338 Changes for the year: Service cost 150,695 - 150,695 Interest 156,622 - 156,622 Changes in benefit terms - - - Differences between expected and actual experience 76,350 - 76,350 Changes of assumptions 58,144 - 58,144 Contributions - employer - 31,957 (31,957) On behalf contributions - State of MN - 203,495 (203,495) Contributions - employee - - - Net investment income - 237,593 (237,593) Benefit payments, including refunds of employee (206,737) (206,737) - contributions - - - Administrative expense - (16,000) 16,000 Other changes - - - Net changes 235,074 250,308 (15,234) Balance at December 31, 2020 $3,290,279 $2,750,175 $540,104 Increase (Decrease) I. PENSION LIABILITY SENSITIVITY The following presents the net pension liability of the Relief Association, calculated using the discount rate of 5.0%, as well as what the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage-point lower (4.0%) or 1-percentage-point higher (6.0%) than the current rate: Current 1% Decrease Discount Rate 1% Increase (4.0%)(5.0%)(6.0%) Net pension liability $716,901 $540,104 $379,048 76 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 J. PENSION PLAN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION Detailed information about the pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued Relief Association financial report. That report may be obtained by writing to Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota, 55317. K. PENSION EXPENSE AND DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES AND DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES RLEATED TO PENSIONS For the year ended December 31, 2020, the City recognized pension expense of $183,852, including $203,495 and $31,957 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for the State of Minnesota’s on-behalf contribution to the plan and the City’s on-behalf contribution to the plan, respectively. At December 31, 2020, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources: Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual economic experience $62,109 $47,430 Changes in actuarial assumptions 92,843 969 Difference between projected and actual investment earnings - 163,523 Total $154,952 $211,922 Amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized as pension expense as follows: Year Ended Pension December 31,Expense 2021 ($111) 2022 (6,417) 2023 (55,181) 2024 4,739 2025 - Thereafter - 77 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Note 10 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN Four Council members of the City of Chanhassen are covered by the Public Employees Defined Contribution Plan (PEDCP), a multiple-employer deferred compensation plan administered by PERA. The PEDCP is a tax qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and all contributions by or on behalf of employees are tax deferred until time of withdrawal. Plan benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings, less administrative expenses. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03, specifies plan provisions, including the employee and employer contribution rates for those qualified personnel who elect to participate. An eligible elected official who decides to participate contributes 5% of salary which is matched by the elected official's employer. For ambulance service personnel, employer contributions are determined by the employer, and for salaried employees must be a fixed percentage of salary. Employer contributions for volunteer personnel may be a unit value for each call or period of alert duty. Employees who are paid for their services may elect to make member contributions in an amount not to exceed the employer share. Employer and employee contributions are combined and used to purchase shares in one or more of the seven accounts of the Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund. For administering the plan, PERA receives 2% of employer contributions and twenty-five hundredths of 1% (.0025) of the assets in each member's account annually. Total contributions made by the City during fiscal year 2020 were: Required Employer Employee (Pension Expense) Employee Employer Rate $1,766 $1,766 5%5%5% Contribution Amount Percentage of Covered Payroll Note 11 OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (OPEB) A. PLAN DESCRIPTION In addition to providing the pension benefits described in Note 8 and 9, the City provides post-employment health care benefits (as defined in paragraph B) for retired employees through a single-employer defined benefit plan. The City’s OPEB plan is administered by the City. The authority to provide these benefits is established in Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.61 Subd. 2a, and 299A.465. The benefits, benefit levels, employee contributions and employer contributions are governed by the City and can be amended by the City through its personnel manual and collective bargaining agreements with employee groups. The Plan is not accounted for as a trust fund, as an irrevocable trust has not been established to account for the plan. The Plan does not issue a separate report. B. BENEFITS PROVIDED Retirees The City is required by State Statute to allow retirees to continue participation in the City’s group health insurance plan if the individual terminates service with the City through service retirement or disability retirement. Employees who satisfy the rule of 80 or attain age 55 and have completed 10 years of service at termination can immediately commence medical benefits. Retirees may obtain dependent coverage while the participating retiree is under age 65. Covered spouses may continue coverage after the retiree’s death. 78 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 The surviving spouse of an active employee may continue coverage in the group health insurance plan after the employee’s death. All health care coverage is provided through the City’s group health insurance plans. The retiree is required to pay 100% of their premium cost for the City-sponsored group health insurance plan in which they participate. The premium is a blended rate determined on the entire active and retiree population. Since the projected claims costs for retirees exceed the blended premium paid by retirees, the retirees are receiving an implicit rate subsidy (benefit). The coverage levels are the same as those afforded to active employees. Upon a retiree reaching age 65, Medicare becomes the primary insurer and the City’s plan becomes secondary. C. PARTICIPANTS As of the January 1, 2020 actuarial valuation, participants consisted of: Active employees receiving benefits 70 Inactive employees currently receiving or entitled to receive benefits - Total 70 D. TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY AND CHANGES IN TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY The City’s total OPEB liability of $167,623 was measured as of December 31, 2020, and was determined by an actuarial valuation as of December 31, 2020. Changes in the total OPEB liability during 2020 were: Balance - beginning of year $155,719 Changes for the year: Service cost 13,504 Interest 5,463 Changes of benefit terms - Differences between expected and actual experience (12,888) Changes in assumptions 9,168 Benefit payments (3,343) Net changes 11,904 Balance - end of year $167,623 The OPEB liability is liquidated by the General fund, water fund, sewer fund, and surface water management fund. 79 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 E. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND OTHER INPUTS The total OPEB liability in the December 31, 2020 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions and other inputs, applied to all periods included in the measurement, unless otherwise specified: Inflation 2.50% Salary increases Based on the most recent disclosed assumptions for the pension plan in which the employee participates. Discount rate 2.12% Investment rate of return 2.12% Healthcare cost trend rates 7.5% for 2020 gradually decreasing to an ultimate rate of 4.5% in 2027 and beyond. Retirees' share of benefit-related costs 100% Since the plan is funded on a pay-as-you-go basis, both the discount rate and the investment rate of return was based on the 20 year AA rated municipal bond rate as of December 31, 2020, obtained from the Bond Buyer G.O. 20 year Bond Muncipal Bond Index. Mortality rates were based on the SOA Pub-2010 General Headcount Weighted Mortality Table fully generational using Scale MP-2019 for active and retirees and SOA Pub-2010 Continuing Survivor Headcount Weighted Mortality Table fully generational using Scale MP-2019 for surviving spouses. 20% of employees are assumed to elect spousal coverage at retirement. Husbands are assumed to be three years older than wives. Actual spousal coverage and age is used for retirees. F. SENSITIVITY OF THE TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY TO CHANGES IN THE DISCOUNT RATE The following presents the total OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1% lower (1.12%) or 1% higher (3.12%) than the current discount rate: 1% Decrease Discount Rate 1% Increase (1.12%) (2.12%) (3.12%) Total OPEB liability $175,870 $167,623 $159,564 80 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 G. SENSITIVITY OF THE TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY TO CHANGES IN THE HEALTHCARE COST TREND RATES The following presents the total OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are 1% lower (6.5% decreasing to 3.5%) or 1% higher (8.5% decreasing to 5.50%) than the current healthcare cost trend rates: Healthcare Cost 1% Decrease Trend Rates 1% Increase (6.5% decreasing to 3.5%)(7.5% decreasing to 4.5%)(8.5% decreas ing to 5.50%) Total OPEB liability $153,206 $167,623 $184,093 H. OPEB EXPENSE AND DEFERRED OUTFLOWS AND INFLOWS OF RESOURCES RELATED TO OPEB For the year ended December 31, 2020, the City recognized $10,392 of OPEB expense. At December 31, 2020, the City reported deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources: Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows of Resources of Resources Differences between expected and actual experience $ - $75,343 Changes in actuarial assumptions 16,102 - Total $16,102 $75,343 Amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense as follows: Year Ended OPEB December 31,Expense 2021 ($8,579) 2022 (8,579) 2023 (8,579) 2024 (8,579) 2024 (8,579) Thereafter (16,346) I. ACTUARIAL METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality and the health care cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and the annual required contributions (ARC) of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to financial statements, presents multi-year trend information that shows whether the 81 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effect of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations. In the December 31, 2020 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial pay cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included a 2.12% investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses) and an annual health care cost trend rate of 7.5% for 2020, decreasing by 0.5% annually to an ultimate rate of 4.5%. These rates include a 2.5% inflation rate. The actuarial value of assets was $0. The plan’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability is being amortized using the level percentage of projected payroll method over 30 years on an open basis. The remaining amortization period at December 31, 2020 was 30 years. Note 12 INTERFUND LOANS AND TRANSFERS Amounts reported as interfund loan receivable/payable at December 31, 2020 are as follows: Interfund Interfund Loan Receivable Loan Payable Major Funds: Water Fund $ - $568,962 Nonmajor Funds 568,962 - Total $568,962 $568,962 82 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 During 2015, the City adopted resolution 2015-15 authorizing an interfund loan to finance construction of Well #15. The Water Fund borrowed $700,000 from the Revolving Assessment Fund and $700,000 from the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund. The loan is being repaid at an interest rate of 2.5% over eight years. Payments during years 2016-2019 were made to the Revolving Assessment Fund and payments during years 2020-2023 will be made to the Capital Replacement Fund. There were $193,225 of repayments in 2020 and $193,593 is expected to be repaid in 2021. Interfund transfers made during 2020 are summarized as follows: Transfers In Transfers Out Major Funds: General Fund $ - $ - Revolving Assessment Fund 1,563,273 - TH101 Improvements - Pioneer to Flying Cloud 1,248,880 Water Fund - 1,555,846 Sewer Fund - 983,663 Surface Water Management Fund - 272,644 Nonmajor Funds 40,724 40,724 Total $2,852,877 $2,852,877 $2,812,153 of interfund transfers were made to finance capital expenditures, primarily in the Revolving Assessment Fund and TH101 Improvements Fund. These transfers are considered routine and consistent with previous practices. Note 13 CONDUIT DEBT From time to time, the City has issued conduit debt to provide financial assistance to private-sector entities for the acquisition and construction of facilities deemed to be in the public interest. The bonds are secured by the property financed and are payable solely from payments received on the underlying mortgage loans. Upon repayment of the bonds, ownership of the acquired facilities transfers to the private-sector entity served by the bond issuance. Neither the City, the State, nor any political subdivision thereof is obligated in any manner for the repayment of the bonds. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. As of December 31, 2020, the outstanding conduit debt is as follows: Bonds Original 12/31/2020 Maturity Project Name Issued Principal Principal Date St. Hubert Catholic Community, Series 2007 10/07 $5,942,140 $2,032,032 2027 Presbyterian Homes, Series 2014B 06/14 9,300,000 6,848,105 2034 Note 14 DEFICIT FUND BALANCES The City does not have any funds with a deficit fund balance at December 31, 2020. 83 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Note 15 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES A. RISK MANAGEMENT The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The City continues to carry commercial insurance for risks of loss, including workers compensation, property and general liability and employee health and accident insurance. There were no significant reductions in insurance from the previous year or settlements in excess of insurance coverage for any of the past three fiscal years. B. LITIGATION The City is in the process of acquiring land for the Lyman Boulevard Phase 2 Project. During 2019, the City and Carver County agreed on an amount for condemnation of two properties. The property owners declined the offer and are suing the City and County for damages. The total amount of damages sought by the property owners is $5,028,510. The total estimated damages per the County appraiser was $432,500. The total amounts awarded by the County Commissioners was $760,500. The property owners appealed that award to a Jury Trial that is scheduled to take place in the future. The degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome, above and beyond the settlement amount awarded by the County Commissioners, in the Jury Trials is unknown. The City is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss, above and beyond the settlement amount awarded by the County Commissioners. C. WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY A potential claim may be asserted against the City arising out of its membership in the Western Area Fire Training Academy (WAFTA). WAFTA is a joint powers entity consisting of 11 member cities that was formed in 1974 to purchase property to be used and operated as a fire training facility. In the late 1980’s, WAFTA became aware that the site was contaminated. Since that time, WAFTA has been working with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and other responsible parties to address the contamination issues on the site. At this time, the City’s share of the potential cost to remediate the site cannot be determined, nor has a claim been asserted against WAFTA or the City. Based on recent studies of the site, it is Management’s belief that the amount of any potential claim is not material to the financial statements. D. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in the form of grants. The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally requires compliance with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreements and is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any disallowed claims resulting from such audits could become a liability of the applicable fund. However, in the opinion of management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial position of the City at December 31, 2020. 84 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 E. TAX ABATEMENTS – PAY-AS-YOU-GO TAX INCREMENT The City occasionally provides tax abatements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.174 to 469.1794 (Tax Increment Financing) through a pay-as-you-go note program. Tax increment financing (TIF) can be used to encourage private development, redevelopment, renovation and renewal, growth in low-to-moderate- income housing, and economic development within the City. TIF captures the increase in tax capacity and property taxes from development or redevelopment to provide funding for the related project. The City has one tax increment district, which has an outstanding pay-as-you-go revenue note. The note is not a general obligation of the City and is payable solely from available tax increments. Accordingly, the note is not reflected in the financial statements of the City. Details of the pay-as-you-go revenue note is as follows: Tax Increment Revenue Note (Frontier Redevelopment) – issued in 2020 in the principal sum of $1,300,000 with an interest rate of 5.0% per annum. Principal and interest payments shall be paid commencing August 1, 2020 and each February 1 and August 1 thereafter to and including February 1, 2045. Payments are payable solely from tax increments, which shall mean 95% of the tax increments derived from the tax increment property and received by the City. The payment reimburses the developer for street, utilities, right-of-way, land acquisition, and other public improvements. The City shall have no obligation to pay unpaid balance of principal or accrued interest that may remain after the final payment on February 1, 2045. Current year abatement (TIF note payments) amounted to $224,660. At December 31, 2020 the principal amount outstanding on the note was $1,137,528. F. COMMITTED CONTRACTS At December 31, 2020, the City had commitments of $8,600,846 for uncompleted construction contracts. In addition, the City entered into construction contracts during 2021 totaling $4,991,136. 85 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Note 16 FUND BALANCE A. CLASSIFICATIONS Definitions of fund balance classifications are included in Note 1P. At December 31, 2020, a summary of the governmental fund balance classifications are as follows: TH101 Revolving Improvements - Other General Assessment Pioneer to Governmental Fund Fund Flying Cloud Funds Total Nonspendable: Prepaid items $63,775 $ - $ - $49,690 $113,465 Restricted for: Debt service - - - 605,422 605,422 Park improvements - - - 998,540 998,540 CATV - public education - - - 43,837 43,837 Public safety - fire - - - 22,128 22,128 Total restricted 0 0 0 1,669,927 1,669,927 Assigned for: Capital improvements - 2,668,475 75,666 2,069,256 4,813,397 Cable communications - - - 524,768 524,768 Cemetery operations - - - 70,855 70,855 Debt service reserve - - - 1,400,914 1,400,914 Total assigned 0 2,668,475 75,666 4,065,793 6,809,934 Unassigned 6,684,991 - - - 6,684,991 Total $6,748,766 $2,668,475 $75,666 $5,785,410 $15,278,317 86 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 B. MINIMUM UNASSIGNED FUND BALANCE POLICY The City Council has formally adopted a policy regarding the minimum unassigned fund balance for the General Fund. The most significant revenue source of the General Fund is property taxes. This revenue source is received in two installments during the year – June and December. As such, it is the City’s goal to begin each fiscal year with sufficient working capital to fund operations between each semi-annual receipt of property taxes. The City’s fund balance policy states the year end General Fund balance shall be sufficient to cover 50% of the property taxes budgeted to be received during the following year. At December 31, 2020, the fund balance of the General Fund exceeded this level. Note 17 LEASE REVENUE The City receives revenue from agreements for the lease of space above its water towers and on City property to communication companies. The space is used for antennas and other equipment necessary to provide radio communications. For accounting purposes, the leases are considered operating leases. Lease revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020 totaled $254,926. Terms of each lease outstanding at year-end are as follows: Lessee Terms Current Term Sprint $25,082 per year with 3% annual increases 8/1/06 - 7/31/21 Sprint $23,486 per year with 3% annual increases 12/1/05 - 11/30/25 Verizon $2,342 per month 5/1/17 - 4/30/22 Nextel West Corp.$22,926 per year with 3% annual increases 12/1/14 - 11/30/24 T-Mobile $2,153 per month with 3% annual increases 11/1/05 - 10/31/25 T-Mobile $22,258 per year with 3% annual increases 1/1/14 - 12/31/24 StoneBridge/Nextera 5% of gross revenues associated with equipment used on property 4/1/06 - 12/31/24 Cingular/AT&T $2,029 per month with 3% annual increases 8/1/12 - 7/31/22 Verizon-Arboretum $2,300 per month, with 2% annual increases 1/1/20 - 12/31/24 Verizon-Minnetonka Middle School $2,300 per month, with 2% annual increases 1/1/20 - 12/31/24 Note 18 RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) recently approved the following statements which were not implemented for these financial statements: Statement No. 87 Leases. The provisions of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2021. Statement No. 89 Accounting for Interest Cost Incurred before the End of a Construction Period. The provisions of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Statement No. 91 Conduit Debt Obligations. The provisions of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021. Statement No. 92 Omnibus 2020. The provisions of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2021. 87 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 2020 Statement No. 93 Replacement of Interbank Offered Rates. The provisions of this Statement contain multiple effective dates, the first being for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2020. Statement No. 94 Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships and Availability Payment Arrangements. The provisions of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022. Statement No. 96 Subscription – Based Information Technology Arrangements. The provisions of this Statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022. The effect these standards may have on future financial statements is not determinable at this time, but it is expected that Statement No. 87 may have a material impact. Note 19 PRESENTATION OF AGENCY FUNDS For the year ended December 31, 2020, the City implemented GASB Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities. Based on the guidance provided by GASB 84, the City's Agency Funds no longer meet the definition of a fiduciary activity. Therefore, the amounts and activity previously reported in fiduciary funds are now reported in the general fund. 88 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 89 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 9 BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 1 of 6 For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Revenues: General property taxes $9,161,833 $9,161,833 $9,241,003 $79,170 $8,751,341 Licenses and permits: Licenses - general government 3,100 3,100 3,000 (100) 3,000 Licenses - public safety 90,500 90,500 95,967 5,467 94,481 Permits - public safety 997,000 997,000 1,374,007 377,007 1,275,996 Permits - public works 31,500 31,500 68,185 36,685 49,102 Permits - community development 6,500 6,500 5,510 (990) 10,025 Total licenses and permits 1,128,600 1,128,600 1,546,669 418,069 1,432,604 Intergovernmental: Federal - police - public safety - - 62,614 62,614 - Federal - fire - public safety - - 356,236 356,236 - Federal - parks and recreation - - 5,152 5,152 - State aid - police - public safety 170,000 170,000 168,658 (1,342) 161,678 State aid - fire - public safety 190,000 190,000 216,211 26,211 206,677 PERA - public safety 20,000 20,000 - (20,000) 19,467 Other 62,000 62,000 (4,183) (66,183) 56,088 Total intergovernmental 442,000 442,000 804,688 362,688 443,910 Charges for services: General government 77,400 77,400 78,850 1,450 77,005 Public safety 3,000 3,000 3,339 339 2,903 Public works 60,800 60,800 105,575 44,775 53,122 Parks and recreation 463,700 463,700 134,435 (329,265) 462,032 Community development 32,000 32,000 24,916 (7,084) 18,817 Total charges for services 636,900 636,900 347,115 (289,785) 613,879 Fines and forfeits: Public safety 116,500 116,500 73,800 (42,700) 89,989 Investment earnings 40,000 40,000 127,746 87,746 162,553 Contributions and donations: Parks and recreation 25,867 25,867 31,231 5,364 25,437 Total contributions and donations 25,867 25,867 31,231 5,364 25,437 Refunds and reimbursements: General government 4,000.00 4,000 16,821 12,821 5,087 Public safety 12,500 12,500 1,306 (11,194) 5,740 Public works 42,500 42,500 37,087 (5,413) 36,088 Parks and recreation 1,000 1,000 - (1,000) 510 Community development - - - - 24 Total refunds and reimbursements 60,000 60,000 55,214 (4,786) 47,449 Other: General government 281,300 281,300 256,453 (24,847) 198,861 Public safety 6,700 6,700 2,349 (4,351) 5,446 Total other 288,000 288,000 258,802 (29,198) 204,307 Total revenues 11,899,700 11,899,700 12,486,268 586,568 11,771,469 2020 Budgeted Amounts See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 90 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 9 BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 2 of 6 For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Expenditures: General government: Legislative: Current: Personal services $46,700 $46,700 $46,357 $343 $45,800 Contractual services 81,600 81,600 90,454 (8,854) 84,572 Total legislative 128,300 128,300 136,811 (8,511) 130,372 Administrative office: Current: Personal services 492,900 492,900 531,529 (38,629) 488,078 Contractual services 61,400 61,400 41,002 20,398 47,471 Total administrative office 554,300 554,300 572,531 (18,231) 535,549 Finance: Current: Personal services 323,500 323,500 342,711 (19,211) 319,457 Materials and supplies 200 200 - 200 - Contractual services 48,300 48,300 52,970 (4,670) 36,352 Total finance 372,000 372,000 395,681 (23,681) 355,809 Election: Current: Personal services 26,000 26,000 28,035 (2,035) - Materials and supplies 4,000 4,000 1,449 2,551 - Contractual services 18,000 18,000 16,957 1,043 14,189 Total election 48,000 48,000 46,441 1,559 14,189 Legal: Current: Contractual services 200,000 200,000 201,523 (1,523) 201,661 Property assessment: Current: Contractual services 161,000 161,000 150,115 10,885 158,707 M.I.S.: Current: Personal services 168,800 168,800 178,403 (9,603) 168,999 Materials and supplies 41,400 41,400 46,634 (5,234) 50,330 Contractual services 48,000 48,000 38,784 9,216 45,342 Total M.I.S. 258,200 258,200 263,821 (5,621) 264,671 2020 Budgeted Amounts See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 91 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 9 BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 3 of 6 For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Expenditures: (continued) General government: (continued) City hall: Current: Personal services $92,400 $92,400 $92,191 $209 $91,734 Materials and supplies 41,400 41,400 39,113 2,287 38,997 Contractual services 277,500 277,500 278,637 (1,137) 276,542 Total City hall 411,300 411,300 409,941 1,359 407,273 Library: Current: Materials and supplies 2,500 2,500 442 2,058 1,645 Contractual services 109,100 109,100 95,298 13,802 121,106 Total library 111,600 111,600 95,740 15,860 122,751 Total general government 2,244,700 2,244,700 2,272,604 (27,904) 2,190,982 Public safety: Police: Current: Materials and supplies 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 - Contractual services 1,977,800 1,977,800 1,889,914 87,886 1,872,646 Total police 1,978,800 1,978,800 1,889,914 88,886 1,872,646 Fire department: Current: Personal services 1,012,200 1,012,200 931,819 80,381 865,124 Materials and supplies 45,100 45,100 43,068 2,032 39,469 Contractual services 152,000 152,000 123,911 28,089 160,661 Total fire department 1,209,300 1,209,300 1,098,798 110,502 1,065,254 Code enforcement: Current: Personal services 696,500 696,500 706,206 (9,706) 684,513 Materials and supplies 6,800 6,800 4,148 2,652 5,959 Contractual services 11,700 11,700 10,552 1,148 10,393 Total code enforcement 715,000 715,000 720,906 (5,906) 700,865 Community Service: Current: Personal services 57,200 57,200 48,400 8,800 48,070 Materials and supplies 1,200 1,200 2,017 (817) 917 Contractual services 5,400 5,400 5,485 (85) 4,466 Total animal control 63,800 63,800 55,902 7,898 53,453 Total public safety 3,966,900 3,966,900 3,765,520 201,380 3,692,218 2020 Budgeted Amounts See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 92 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 9 BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 4 of 6 For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Expenditures: (continued) Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Public works: Engineering: Current: Personal services $677,600 $677,600 $655,565 $22,035 $612,469 Materials and supplies 800 800 3,707 (2,907) 2,329 Contractual services 29,300 29,300 32,939 (3,639) 68,097 Total engineering 707,700 707,700 692,211 15,489 682,895 Street maintenance: Current: Personal services 942,700 942,700 872,618 70,082 864,237 Materials and supplies 115,300 115,300 124,936 (9,636) 126,915 Contractual services 43,400 43,400 49,831 (6,431) 36,287 Total street maintenance 1,101,400 1,101,400 1,047,385 54,015 1,027,439 Street lighting: Current: Materials and supplies 4,000 4,000 1,299 2,701 5,838 Contractual services 366,500 366,500 386,494 (19,994) 357,465 Total street lighting 370,500 370,500 387,793 (17,293) 363,303 Fleet department: Current: Personal services 323,400 323,400 334,139 (10,739) 334,146 Materials and supplies 171,700 171,700 103,260 68,440 164,243 Contractual services 70,300 70,300 56,695 13,605 66,630 Total fleet department 565,400 565,400 494,094 71,306 565,019 Total public works 2,745,000 2,745,000 2,621,483 123,517 2,638,656 Parks and recreation: Parks and recreation commission: Current: Materials and supplies 100 100 - 100 - Contractual services 1,100 1,100 - 1,100 185 Total parks and recreation commission 1,200 1,200 0 1,200 185 Parks and recreation administration: Current: Personal services 250,300 250,300 248,104 2,196 249,602 Materials and supplies 200 200 107 93 510 Contractual services 5,700 5,700 2,289 3,411 4,107 Total parks and recreation administration 256,200 256,200 250,500 5,700 254,219 Recreation center: Current: Personal services 234,500 234,500 181,753 52,747 222,938 Materials and supplies 17,700 17,700 3,904 13,796 12,896 Contractual services 94,400 94,400 67,798 26,602 79,336 Total recreation center 346,600 346,600 253,455 93,145 315,170 2020 Budgeted Amounts See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 93 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 9 BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 5 of 6 For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Expenditures: (continued) Parks and recreation: (continued) Senior citizen center: Current: Personal services $84,500 $84,500 $84,813 ($313) $84,106 Materials and supplies 4,300 4,300 1,145 3,155 2,228 Contractual services 30,700 30,700 14,741 15,959 45,991 Total senior citizen center 119,500 119,500 100,699 18,801 132,325 Recreation programs: Current: Personal services 246,600 246,600 138,669 107,931 239,030 Materials and supplies 22,300 22,300 5,844 16,456 23,954 Contractual services 128,800 128,800 53,032 75,768 126,724 Total recreation programs 397,700 397,700 197,545 200,155 389,708 Self-supporting programs: Current: Personal services 19,900 19,900 13,709 6,191 17,274 Materials and supplies 3,300 3,300 2,672 628 4,564 Contractual services 12,500 12,500 4,542 7,958 11,127 Total self-supporting programs 35,700 35,700 20,923 14,777 32,965 Lake Ann Park operations: Current: Personal services 12,300 12,300 - 12,300 10,934 Materials and supplies 10,200 10,200 469 9,731 7,857 Contractual services 48,600 48,600 44,697 3,903 45,126 Total Lake Ann Park operations 71,100 71,100 45,166 25,934 63,917 Park maintenance: Current: Personal services 910,200 910,200 773,869 136,331 830,324 Materials and supplies 84,200 84,200 64,851 19,349 93,032 Contractual services 104,300 104,300 127,675 (23,375) 114,953 Total park maintenance 1,098,700 1,098,700 966,395 132,305 1,038,309 Recreation sports: Current: Personal services 30,400 30,400 7,176 23,224 20,064 Materials and supplies 7,900 7,900 607 7,293 5,876 Contractual services 300 300 - 300 149 Total recreation sports 38,600 38,600 7,783 30,817 26,089 Total parks and recreation 2,365,300 2,365,300 1,842,466 522,834 2,252,887 2020 Budgeted Amounts See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 94 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 9 BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND Page 6 of 6 For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Expenditures: (continued) Community development: Planning commission: Current: Materials and supplies $200 $200 $ - $200 $ - Contractual services 1,500 1,500 1,750 (250) 1,090 Total planning commission 1,700 1,700 1,750 (50) 1,090 Planning administration: Current: Personal services 519,600 519,600 536,848 (17,248) 520,708 Materials and supplies 400 400 68 332 179 Contractual services 11,500 11,500 4,290 7,210 6,270 Total planning administration 531,500 531,500 541,206 (9,706) 527,157 Senior facility commission: Current: Personal services 29,600 29,600 30,542 (942) 29,810 Contractual services 15,000 15,000 - 15,000 8,834 Total senior facility commission 44,600 44,600 30,542 14,058 38,644 Total community development 577,800 577,800 573,498 4,302 566,891 Total expenditures 11,899,700 11,899,700 11,075,571 824,129 11,341,634 Revenues over expenditures 0 0 1,410,697 1,410,697 429,835 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers out - - - - (846,459) Total other financing sources (uses)0 0 - - (846,459) Net change in fund balance $0 $0 1,410,697 $1,410,697 ($416,624) Fund balance - January 1 5,338,069 5,754,693 Fund balance - December 31 $6,748,766 $5,338,069 Budgeted Amounts 2020 See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 95 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 10 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE CITY'S TOTAL OPEB LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS Last Ten Fiscal Years 2020 2019 2018 Total OPEB liability: Service cost $13,504 $13,547 $14,388 Interest 5,463 8,738 7,032 Changes of benefit terms - - - Differences between expected and actual experience (12,888) (82,370) - Changes in assumptions 9,168 16,736 (7,402) Benefit payments (3,343) - (9,869) Net change in total OPEB liability 11,904 (43,349) 4,149 Total OPEB liability - beginning 155,719 199,068 194,919 Total OPEB liability - ending $167,623 $155,719 $199,068 Covered-employee payroll $5,270,695 $5,270,695 $5,151,178 Total OPEB liability as a percentage of covered-employee payroll 3.2%3.0%3.9% The schedule is provided prospectively beginning with the City's fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 and is intended to show a ten year trend. Additional years will be added as they become available. See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 96 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 11 SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY - GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND Last Ten Fiscal Years City's Plan State's Proportionate Fiduciary Proportionate Share of the Net Net City's City's Share Pension Liability City's Position Proportionate Proportionate (Amount) and the State's Proportionate as a Share Share of the Net Proportionate Share of the Net Percentage (Percentage) (Amount) Pension Share of the Net Pension Liability of the Measurement Fiscal Year of the of the Net Liability Pension Liability as a Percentage Total Date Ending Net Pension Pension Associated Associated with Covered of its Covered Pension June 30 December 31 Liability Liability (a) with City (b) City (a+b) Payroll (c) Payroll ((a+b)/c) Liability 2015 2015 0.0791% $4,099,373 $0 $4,099,373 $4,651,703 88.1%78.2% 2016 2016 0.0759% 6,162,704 80,496 6,243,200 4,708,444 132.6% 68.9% 2017 2017 0.0751% 4,794,334 60,265 4,854,599 4,836,519 100.4% 75.9% 2018 2018 0.0760% 4,216,168 138,310 4,354,478 5,110,253 85.2%79.5% 2019 2019 0.0727% 4,019,420 124,828 4,144,248 5,143,989 80.6%80.2% 2020 2020 0.0741% 4,442,634 137,022 4,579,656 5,283,373 86.7%79.1% The schedule is provided prospectively beginning with the City's fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and is intended to show a ten year trend. Additional years will be reported as they become available. See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 97 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 12 SCHEDULE OF PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS - GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND Last Ten Fiscal Years Statutorily Contributions in Contribution Contributions as a Required Relation to the Deficiency Covered Percentage of Fiscal Year Contribution Statutorily Required (Excess) Payroll Covered-Employee Ending (a) Contribution (b)(a-b)(c)Payroll (b/c) December 31, 2015 $346,881 $346,881 $0 $4,625,080 7.50% December 31, 2016 358,611 358,611 - 4,781,489 7.50% December 31, 2017 371,824 371,824 - 4,957,652 7.50% December 31, 2018 383,686 383,686 - 5,115,814 7.50% December 31, 2019 390,082 390,082 - 5,201,071 7.50% December 31, 2020 409,847 409,847 - 5,464,626 7.50% The schedule is provided prospectively beginning with the City's fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and is intended to show a ten year trend. Additional years will be reported as they become available. See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 98 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 13 SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF NET PENSION LIABILITY - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE FUND Last Ten Fiscal Years Proportionate Share Proportionate Proportionate of the Net Pension Plan Fiduciary Share Share (Amount) Liability as a Net Position as (Percentage) of of the Net Percentage of its a Percentage Measurement Fiscal Year the Net Pension Pension Covered Covered of the Total Date Ending Liability Liability (a) Payroll (b) Payroll (a/b) Pension Liability June 30, 2015 December 31, 2015 0.0200%$227,247 $180,370 126.0%86.6% June 30, 2016 December 31, 2016 0.0190%762,503 186,408 409.1%63.9% June 30, 2017 December 31, 2017 0.0190%256,523 194,526 131.9%85.4% June 30, 2018 December 31, 2018 0.0193%205,718 203,653 101.0%88.8% June 30, 2019 December 31, 2019 0.0205%218,243 216,056 101.0%89.3% June 30, 2020 December 31, 2020 0.0200%263,621 225,631 116.8%87.2% The schedule is provided prospectively beginning with the City's fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and is intended to show a ten year trend. Additional years will be reported as they become available. See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 99 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 14 SCHEDULE OF PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE FUND Last Ten Fiscal Years Statutorily Contributions in Contribution Contributions as a Required Relation to the Deficiency Covered Percentage of Fiscal Year Contribution Statutorily Required (Excess) Payroll Covered Ending (a) Contribution (b)(a-b)(c)Payroll (b/c) December 31, 2015 $29,647 $29,647 $0 $183,006 16.20% December 31, 2016 30,790 30,790 - 190,064 16.20% December 31, 2017 32,612 32,612 - 201,307 16.20% December 31, 2018 33,511 33,511 - 206,857 16.20% December 31, 2019 37,761 37,761 - 222,780 16.95% December 31, 2020 40,530 40,530 - 228,980 17.70% The schedule is provided prospectively beginning with the City's fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and is intended to show a ten year trend. Additional years will be reported as they become available. See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 100 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 15 SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN THE NET PENSION LIABILITY AND RELATED RATIOS - CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Fiscal year ending and measurement date 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Total pension liability: Service cost $150,695 $143,922 $143,922 $88,924 $88,924 $86,369 Interest 156,622 154,784 149,836 127,729 128,235 118,909 Changes of benefit terms - - - 212,120 - 279,202 Differences between expected and actual experience 76,350 (79,049) - 5,145 - (5,328) Changes of assumptions 58,144 (902) (1,074) 231,636 (203) - Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (206,737) (170,835) (216,595) (370,143) (113,883) (470,743) Net change in total pension liability 235,074 47,920 76,089 295,411 103,073 8,409 Total pension liability - beginning 3,055,205 3,007,285 2,931,196 2,635,785 2,532,712 2,524,303 Total pension liability - ending (a)$3,290,279 $3,055,205 $3,007,285 $2,931,196 $2,635,785 $2,532,712 Plan fiduciary net position: Contributions - employer $31,957 $47,399 $54,749 $ - $ - $37,571 Contributions - State of Minnesota 203,495 190,045 184,695 181,554 177,831 177,784 Contributions - employee - - - - - - Net investment income 237,593 328,474 (130,928) 306,593 158,581 (105,958) Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (206,737) (170,835) (216,595) (340,243) (113,883) (470,743) Administrative expense (16,000) (16,386) (17,350) (14,875) (16,972) (7,225) Other changes - - - 500 - Net change in plan fiduciary net position 250,308 378,697 (125,429) 133,029 206,057 (368,571) Plan fiduciary net position - beginning 2,499,867 2,121,170 2,246,599 2,113,570 1,907,513 2,276,084 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b)$2,750,175 $2,499,867 $2,121,170 $2,246,599 $2,113,570 $1,907,513 Net pension liability - ending (a) - (b)$540,104 $555,338 $886,115 $684,597 $522,215 $625,199 Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability 83.6%81.8%70.5%76.6%80.2%75.3% Covered payroll*NA NA NA NA NA NA Net pension liability as a percentage of covered payroll*Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable *The Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association is comprised of volunteers, therefore there are no payroll expenditures. GASB 68 was implemented in 2015. Information prior to 2015 is not available. December 31, See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 101 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Statement 16 SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS - CHANHASSEN FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION Last Ten Fiscal Years Actuarially Contribution Contributions Determined Deficiency as a Percentage Fiscal Year Contribution Employer State of MN (Excess) Covered of Covered Ending (a) Contributions (b) Contributions (c) (a-b-c) Payroll Payroll December 31, 2015 $142,501 $37,571 $174,784 ($69,854) ** December 31, 2016 171,760 - 176,831 (5,071) ** December 31, 2017 171,760 - 176,554 (4,794) ** December 31, 2018 236,444 54,749 181,695 - ** December 31, 2019 237,444 47,399 190,045 - ** December 31, 2020 235,452 31,957 203,495 - ** *The Chanhassen Fire Department Relief Association is comprised of volunteers, therefore, there are no payroll expenditures. (i.e., there are no covered payroll amounts or percentage calculations.) GASB 68 was implemented in 2015. Information prior to 2015 is not available. Contributions in Relation to the Actuarially Determined Contribution See accompanying notes to the required supplementary information. 102 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO RSI December 31, 2020 A. LEGAL COMPLIANCE – BUDGETS The General Fund budget is legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the expenditure category level. B. PENSION INFORMATION PERA – General Employees Retirement Fund 2020 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The price inflation assumption was decreased from 2.50% to 2.25%.  The payroll growth assumption was decreased from 3.25% to 3.00%.  As recommended in the June 30, 2019 experience study, assumed salary increase rates were decreased 0.25% and assumed rates of retirement were changed resulting in more unreduced (normal) retirements and slightly fewer Rule of 90 and early retirements. Assumed rates of termination and disability were also changed.  The base mortality tables were changed from RP-2014 tables to Pub-2010 tables, with adjustments.  The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale MP-2018 to Scale MP-2019.  The assumed spouse age difference was changed from two years older for females to one year older.  The assumed number of married male new retirees electing the 100% Joint & Survivor option changed from 35% to 45%. The assumed number of married female new retirees electing the 100% Joint & Survivor option changed from 15% to 30%. The corresponding number of married new retirees electing the Life annuity option was adjusted accordingly. Changes in Plan Provisions:  Augmentation for current privatized members was reduced to 2.0% for the period July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2023 and 0.0% after. Augmentation was eliminated for privatizations occurring after June 30, 2020. 2019 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018. Changes in the Plan Provisions  The employer supplemental contribution was changed prospectively, decreasing from $31.0 million to $21.0 million per year. The State’s special funding contribution was changed prospectively, requiring $16.0 million due per year through 2031. 2018 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2015 to MP-2017.  The assumed benefit increase was changed from 1.0 percent per year through 2044 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.25 percent per year. 103 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO RSI December 31, 2020 2017 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) loads were changed from 0.8% for active members and 60% for vested and non-vested deferred members. The revised CSA loads are now 0.0% for active member liability, 15.0% for vested deferred member liability and 3.0% for non-vested deferred member liability.  The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year for all years to 1.0% per year through 2044 and 2.5% per year thereafter. 2016 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2035 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years.  The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%.  Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll growth and 2.50% for inflation. PERA – Public Employees Police and Fire Fund 2020 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2018 to MP-2019. 2019 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2017 to MP-2018. Changes in the Plan Provisions  There have been no changes since the prior valuation. 2018 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The mortality projection scale was changed from MP-2016 to MP-2017. 2017 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The single discount rate was changed from 5.6% to 7.5%.  Assumed salary increases were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2016 experience study. The net effect is proposed rates that average 0.34% lower than the previous rates.  Assumed rates of retirement were changed, resulting in fewer retirements. 104 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO RSI December 31, 2020  The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) load was 30% for vested and non-vested deferred members. The CSA has been changed to 33% for vested members and 2% for non-vested members.  The base mortality table for healthy annuitants was changed from the RP-2000 fully generational table to the RP-2014 fully generational table (with a base year of 2006), with male rates adjusted by a factor of 0.96. The mortality improvement scale was changed from Scale AA to Scale MP-2016. The base mortality table for disabled annuitants was changed from the RP-2000 disabled mortality table to the mortality tables assumed for healthy retirees.  Assumed termination rates were decreased to 3.0% for the first three years of service. Rates beyond the select period of three years were adjusted, resulting in more expected terminations overall.  Assumed percentage of married female members was decreased from 65% to 60%.  Assumed age difference was changed from separate assumptions for male members (wives assumed to be three years younger) and female members (husbands assumed to be four years older) to the assumption that males are two years older than females.  The assumed percentage of female members electing Joint and Survivor annuities was increased.  The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00% for all years to 1.00% per year through 2064 and 2.50% thereafter. 2016 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0% per year through 2037 and 2.5% per year thereafter to 1.0% per year for all future years.  The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9% to 7.5%. The single discount rate changed from 7.9% to 5.6%.  The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25% to 3.25% for payroll growth and 2.50% for inflation. Single Employer – Fire Relief Association Valuation date – actuarially determined contribution rates are calculated as of January 1 every other year, which is the same date as the beginning of the fiscal year beginning in which contributions are reported. 2020 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The mortality assumption was updated from the PubS-2010 Mortality Table Projected Generationally from 2010 with the MP-2019 Mortality Improvement Scale to the PubS-2010 Mortality Table Projected Generationally from 2010 with the MP-2020 Mortality Improvement Scale. 2019 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The mortality table used to measure funding liability has been changed from RP -2014 Sex Distinct Blue Collar Mortality with generational improvements beginning in 2006 (based on assumptions 105 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NOTES TO RSI December 31, 2020 developed from the 2017 Social Security Trustees Report) to PubS-2010 Mortality with generational improvements projected beginning in 2010 based on SOA Scale MP-2019. 2018 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  Mortality assumptions were determined using the RP-2014 Blue Collar Mortality with fully generational improvements from 2006 based on assumptions from the Social Security Administration’s 2018 trustees report.  The mortality improvement scale used to measure liability has been changed from an improvement scale based on assumptions developed from the 2017 Social Security Trustees Report to an improvement scaled based on assumptions developed from the 2018 Social Security trustees Report. The base table (RP-2014 Blue Collar) and year in which improvements began (2006) remained unchanged. This results in a decrease in liability and service cost. 2017 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  The mortality improvement scale has been changed from an improvement scale based on assumptions developed from the 2016 Social Security Trustees Report to an improvement scale based on assumptions developed from the 2017 Social Security Trustees Report.  Disability rates have changed from 0.03% at age 20, grading to 0.33% at age 50 to Class 1 1985 Disability Rates.  The lump sum benefit accrual amount has been projected to increase by 9.27% every three years (3% compounded each year). 2016 Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:  As of December 31, 2016, the mortality assumption was changed to the RP-2014 Blue Collar Mortality with fully generational improvements from 2006 based on assumptions from the Social Security Administration’s 2016 trustees report. Details can be obtained from the financial reports of the Fire Relief Association. C. OPEB INFORMATION No assets are accumulated in a trust that meets the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB Statement No. 75 to pay related benefits. 106 COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL NONMAJOR FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES 107 - This page intentionally left blank - 108 NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS 109 - This page intentionally left blank - 110 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS The Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS The Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and payment of, interest, principal and related costs on general long-term debt. CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS The Capital Project Funds account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Proprietary Funds). 111 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET Statement 17 NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For December 31, 2019 Special Debt Capital Revenue Service Project 2020 2019 Assets: Cash and investments $616,317 $2,372,396 $2,670,180 $5,658,893 $7,175,296 Accrued interest receivable 3,276 14,190 18,686 36,152 30,804 Due from other governmental units - - 971 971 25,527 Accounts receivable - net 51,406 - 35,668 87,074 86,418 Property taxes receivable - - - - 9,227 Prepaid items 1,069 - 48,621 49,690 8,781 Interfund loan receivable - - 568,962 568,962 713,600 Special assessments receivable - 319,528 - 319,528 319,840 Total assets $672,068 $2,706,114 $3,343,088 $6,721,270 $8,369,493 Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable $6,050 $380,250 $206,103 $592,403 $496,194 Due to other governmental units - - 10,679 10,679 202,903 Due to other funds - - - - 570 Salaries payable 3,361 - - 3,361 8,945 Contracts payable - - 9,889 9,889 5,439 Interfund loan payable - - - - - Total liabilities 9,411 380,250 226,671 616,332 714,051 Deferred inflows of resources: Unavailable revenue - 319,528 - 319,528 319,840 Fund balance: Nonspendable 1,069 - 48,621 49,690 8,781 Restricted 65,965 605,422 998,540 1,669,927 2,944,091 Assigned 595,623 1,400,914 2,069,256 4,065,793 4,383,300 Unassigned - - - - (570) Total fund balance 662,657 2,006,336 3,116,417 5,785,410 7,335,602 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balance $672,068 $2,706,114 $3,343,088 $6,721,270 $8,369,493 Total Nonmajor Governmental Funds 112 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND Statement 18 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 Special Debt Capital Revenue Service Project 2020 2019 Revenues: General property taxes $ - $938,012 $893,000 $1,831,012 $1,828,312 Tax increment collections - 236,485 236,485 - Licenses and permits - - 28,111 28,111 614,586 Intergovernmental 1,560,038 - 328,627 1,888,665 301,539 Franchise Fees 177,362 - - 177,362 185,181 Special assessments - 352 - 352 131,702 Charges for services 13,900 185,794 - 199,694 8,950 Investment earnings 15,303 66,297 101,286 182,886 232,891 Contributions and donations 24,870 - - 24,870 44,765 Refunds and reimbursements - - 33,731 33,731 26,016 Other - - 4,400 4,400 2,800 Total revenues 1,791,473 1,190,455 1,625,640 4,607,568 3,376,742 Expenditures: Current: General government 652,523 19,262 417,382 1,089,167 453,679 Public safety 21,385 - - 21,385 110,326 Public works - - 381,808 381,808 424,953 Parks and recreation - - 12,005 12,005 13,725 Community development - - 229,736 229,736 570 Capital outlay: General government 747,757 - 85,277 833,034 110,044 Public safety 101,635 - 285,893 387,528 701,818 Public works 125,640 - 330,836 456,476 79,394 Parks and recreation 97,786 - 966,308 1,064,094 797,124 Debt service: Principal - 1,585,000 - 1,585,000 720,000 Interest and paying agent fees - 143,970 - 143,970 157,312 Total expenditures 1,746,726 1,748,232 2,709,245 6,204,203 3,568,945 Revenues over (under) expenditures 44,747 (557,777) (1,083,605) (1,596,635) (192,203) Other financing sources (uses): Sale of capital assets - - 46,443 46,443 25,698 Transfers in - 40,724 - 40,724 350,000 Transfers out - (40,724) - (40,724)(9,453) Total other financing sources (uses)0 0 46,443 46,443 366,245 Net change in fund balance 44,747 (557,777) (1,037,162) (1,550,192) 174,042 Fund balance - January 1 617,910 2,564,113 4,153,579 7,335,602 7,161,560 Fund balance - December 31 $662,657 $2,006,336 $3,116,417 $5,785,410 $7,335,602 Total Nonmajor Governmental Funds 113 - This page intentionally left blank - 114 NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are established to account for taxes and other revenues set aside for a particular purpose. Revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become available and measurable. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the related liability is incurred. Contribution Fund – This fund accounts for the proceeds that the City receives from charitable gambling. The City collects 10% of the net proceeds from a pull-tab operation in the City. By state statute, the fund may only be used for equipment and training for the City’s fire department. Cemetery Fund – The City owns and operates a municipal cemetery. In 2014, improvements were made to add approximately 300 additional plots. This fund accounts for all plot fees and maintenance going forward. Cemetery operations had previously been accounted for within the City’s General Fund. CATV Fund – Under the terms of the franchise agreement with Mediacom, the City is to receive 5% of the revenues derived from cable television sales within the City. These monies are dedicated solely to improving public broadcasting capabilities, studio improvements, and other capital expenditures improving the overall cable system. Grant Fund- This fund accounts for the revenues and expenditures related to federal and state financial assistance programs. 115 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SUBCOMBINING BALANCE SHEET Statement 19 NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For December 31, 2019 201 Contribution Fund 202 Cemetery Fund 210 CATV Fund 2020 2019 Assets: Cash and investments $20,660 $70,467 $525,190 $616,317 $582,916 Accrued interest receivable 104 388 2,784 3,276 2,912 Accounts receivable - net 1,923 - 49,483 51,406 50,923 Prepaid items - - 1,069 1,069 - Total assets $22,687 $70,855 $578,526 $672,068 $636,751 Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable $ - $ - $6,050 $6,050 $9,896 Salaries payable 559 - 2,802 3,361 8,945 Total liabilities 559 0 8,852 9,411 18,841 Fund balance: Nonspendable - - 1,069 1,069 - Restricted 22,128 - 43,837 65,965 61,995 Assigned - 70,855 524,768 595,623 555,915 Total fund balance 22,128 70,855 569,674 662,657 617,910 Total liabilities and fund balance $22,687 $70,855 $578,526 $672,068 $636,751 Total Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds 116 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SUBCOMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES Statement 20 AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 201 Contribution Fund 202 Cemetery Fund 210 CATV Fund 212 Grant Fund 2020 2019 Revenues: Intergovernmental $ - $ - $ - $1,560,038 $1,560,038 $ - Franchise fees - - 177,362 - 177,362 185,181 Charges for services - 13,900 - - 13,900 8,950 Investment earnings 485 1,810 13,008 - 15,303 20,730 Contributions and donations 24,870 - - - 24,870 42,265 Refunds and reimbursements - - - - - - Total revenues 25,355 15,710 190,370 1,560,038 1,791,473 257,126 Expenditures: Current: General government - 3,563 161,740 487,220 652,523 172,455 Public safety 21,385 - - - 21,385 54,615 Capital outlay: General government - - - 747,757 747,757 60,074 Public safety - - - 101,635 101,635 - Public works - - - 125,640 125,640 - Parks and recreation - - 97,786 97,786 - Total expenditures 21,385 3,563 161,740 1,560,038 1,746,726 287,144 Net change in fund balance 3,970 12,147 28,630 0 44,747 (30,018) Fund balance - January 1 18,158 58,708 541,044 0 617,910 647,928 Fund balance - December 31 $22,128 $70,855 $569,674 $0 $662,657 $617,910 Total Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds 117 - This page intentionally left blank - 118 NONMAJOR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Debt Service Funds are maintained on the modified accrual basis of accounting for revenues from taxes and other sources set aside for the payment of the debt obligations of the City. Principal and interest on the general long-term debt is recognized when due. Permanent Revolving Debt – This fund is used to account for excess resources from matured bond issues. General Obligation Bond Funds – These funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for payment of general obligation bonds or other general indebtedness and the interest thereon. 119 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SUBCOMBINING BALANCE SHEET Statement 21 NONMAJOR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For December 31, 2019 300 Permanent Revolving Debt 368 2009A G.O. Refunding Bonds 370 2016A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2020 2019 Assets: Cash and investments $930,176 $838,668 $603,552 $2,372,396 $2,927,684 Cash with escrow agent - - - - - Accrued interest receivable 7,572 4,748 1,870 14,190 12,134 Property taxes receivable - - - - 4,790 Special assessments receivable 8,406 311,122 - 319,528 319,840 Total assets $946,154 $1,154,538 $605,422 $2,706,114 $3,264,448 Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable $ - $380,250 $ - $380,250 $380,495 Deferred inflows of resources: Unavailable revenue 8,406 311,122 - 319,528 319,840 Fund balance: Restricted - - 605,422 605,422 1,344,306 Assigned 937,748 463,166 - 1,400,914 1,219,807 Total fund balance 937,748 463,166 605,422 2,006,336 2,564,113 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balance $946,154 $1,154,538 $605,422 $2,706,114 $3,264,448 Total Nonmajor Debt Service Funds 120 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SUBCOMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND Statement 22 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 300 Permanent Revolving Debt 368 2009A G.O. Refunding Bonds 369 2010A G.O. Library Refunding Bonds 370 2016A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2020 2019 Revenues: General property taxes $ - $ - $457,412 $480,600 $938,012 $935,312 Special assessments 352 - - - 352 373 Investment earnings 32,764 22,183 2,612 8,738 66,297 86,381 Charges for services 185,794 - - - 185,794 - Total revenues 218,910 22,183 460,024 489,338 1,190,455 1,022,066 Expenditures: Current: General government 19,262 - - - 19,262 79,921 Debt service: Principal - - 1,240,000 345,000 1,585,000 720,000 Interest and paying agent fees - - 40,720 103,250 143,970 157,312 Total expenditures 19,262 0 1,280,720 448,250 1,748,232 957,233 Revenues over (under) expenditures 199,648 22,183 (820,696) 41,088 (557,777) 64,833 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in - - 40,724 - 40,724 - Transfers out (40,724) - - - (40,724) - Total other financing sources (uses) (40,724)0 40,724 0 0 0 Net change in fund balance 158,924 22,183 (779,972) 41,088 (557,777) 64,833 Fund balance - January 1 778,824 440,983 779,972 564,334 2,564,113 2,499,280 Fund balance - December 31 $937,748 $463,166 $0 $605,422 $2,006,336 $2,564,113 Total Nonmajor Debt Service Funds 121 - This page intentionally left blank - 122 NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Capital Project Funds are used to account for the construction and financing of large capital projects. Revenues and expenditures are recognized on the modified accrual basis. Revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become available and measurable. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which they are incurred. Most capital projects are singular in purpose and their revenues/expenditures cannot be used for subsidizing any other operating fund. In each of these cases, bonds or other revenues received can only be used for these specific activities. The following Capital Project Funds differ in that several of the expenditure categories represent recurring types of costs, i.e., personal services, repair and maintenance of utilities, and/or recurring land improvements. 400 Capital Replacement Fund – Accounts for the City’s annual equipment purchases not related to the City’s enterprise funds. The fund currently does include a property tax levy to support the annual purchases. 401 Park Replacement Fund – Accounts for replacement or repair of major park equipment/infrastructure, including playgrounds, picnic shelters, hockey rinks, bridges, fences, walls, etc. The maintenance and replacement schedule is an ongoing endeavor that will be updated as new investments are made or aging structures are removed. 410 Park Acquisition and Development – Accounts for park dedication fees as required by the City ordinance. These funds are then utilized to finance park and trail improvements identified in the park and recreation section of the City’s comprehensive plan. 413 Transit Station Assessment Fund – Accounts for the interfund loan from the Water Fund to fund costs associated with the redevelopment of the Dinner Theater Transit Station in TIF #10, and for the repayment of the special assessment to repay those costs. 420 Street Pavement Management – Accounts for sealcoating costs on local streets. 480 TIF #11 – Accounts for tax increment financing for the downtown district, TIF #11 – Frontier Development #2. 603 Lyman Blvd Improvements – Accounts for the street and utility improvement of Lyman Blvd. 123 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SUBCOMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For December 31, 2019 400 Capital 401 Park Replacement Fund Replacement Fund Assets: Cash and investments $500,389 $357,054 Accrued interest receivable 2,978 2,575 Due from other governmental units 963 - Accounts receivable - net 35,668 - Property taxes receivable - - Prepaid items 48,621 - Interfund loan receivable 568,962 - Special assessments receivable - - Total assets $1,157,581 $359,629 Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable $89,228 $ - Due to other governmental units - - Due to other funds - - Contracts payable - - Interfund loan payable - - Total liabilities 89,228 0 Deferred inflows of resources: Unavailable revenue - - Fund balance: Nonspendable 48,621 - Restricted - - Assigned 1,019,732 359,629 Unassigned - - Total fund balance 1,068,353 359,629 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balance $1,157,581 $359,629 124 Statement 23 410 Park 420 Street 480 Frontier 603 Lyman Acquisition and 413 Transit Station Pavement Development #2 Boulevard Total Nonmajor Development Assessment Fund Management TIF#11 Improvements 2020 2019 $1,000,528 $102,968 $454,459 $115,875 $138,907 $2,670,180 $3,664,696 8,923 583 2,736 105 786 18,686 15,758 - - 8 - - 971 25,527 - - - - - 35,668 35,495 - - - - - - 4,437 - - - - - 48,621 8,781 - - - - - 568,962 713,600 - - - - - - - $1,009,451 $103,551 $457,203 $115,980 $139,693 $3,343,088 $4,468,294 $6,900 $ - $663 109,312 $ - $206,103 $105,803 10,679 - - - - 10,679 202,903 - - - - - - 570 - - 9,889 - - 9,889 5,439 - - - - - - - 17,579 0 10,552 109,312 0 226,671 314,715 - - - - - - - - - - - - 48,621 8,781 991,872 - - 6,668 - 998,540 1,537,790 - 103,551 446,651 - 139,693 2,069,256 2,607,578 - - - - - - (570) 991,872 103,551 446,651 6,668 139,693 3,116,417 4,153,579 $1,009,451 $103,551 $457,203 $115,980 $139,693 $3,343,088 $4,468,294 Capital Project Funds 125 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SUBCOMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND Statement 24 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES Page 1 of 2 NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 410 Park 413 Transit Station 420 Street 400 Capital 401 Park Acquisition and Assessment Pavement Replacement Fund Replacement Fund Development Fund Management Revenues: General property taxes $800,000 $ - $ - $ - $93,000 Tax increment collections - - - - - Licenses and permits - - 28,111 - - Intergovernmental - - - - 328,627 Special assessments - - - - - Investment earnings 27,898 12,030 41,690 2,724 12,782 Contributions and donations - - - - - Refunds and reimbursements 33,723 - - - 8 Other 4,400 - - - - Total revenues 866,021 12,030 69,801 2,724 434,417 Expenditures: Current: General government 417,382 - - - - Public safety - - - - - Public works 2,296 - - - 354,282 Parks and recreation - - 12,005 - - Community development - - - - - Capital outlay: General government 85,277 - - - - Public safety 285,893 - - - - Public works 330,836 - - - - Parks and recreation 199,507 163,087 603,714 - - Total expenditures 1,321,191 163,087 615,719 0 354,282 Revenues over (under) expenditures (455,170) (151,057) (545,918)2,724 80,135 Other financing sources (uses): Sale of capital assets 46,443 - - - - Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out - - - - - Total other financing sources (uses)46,443 0 - 0 0 Net change in fund balance (408,727) (151,057) (545,918)2,724 80,135 Fund balance - January 1 1,477,080 510,686 1,537,790 100,827 366,516 Fund balance - December 31 $1,068,353 $359,629 $991,872 $103,551 $446,651 126 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SUBCOMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND Statement 24 CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES Page 2 of 2 NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Totals For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 480 Frontier 603 Lyman Development #2 Boulevard TIF#11 Improvements 2020 2019 Revenues: General property taxes $ - $ - $893,000 $893,000 Tax increment collections 236,485 - 236,485 $ - Licenses and permits - - 28,111 614,586 Intergovernmental - - 328,627 301,539 Special assessments - - - 131,329 Investment earnings 489 3,673 101,286 125,780 Contributions and donations - - - 2,500 Refunds and reimbursements - - 33,731 26,016 Other - - 4,400 2,800 Total revenues 236,974 3,673 1,625,640 2,097,550 Expenditures: Current: General government - - 417,382 201,303 Public safety - - - 55,711 Public works - 25,230 381,808 424,953 Parks and recreation - - 12,005 13,725 Community development 229,736 - 229,736 570 Capital outlay: General government - - 85,277 49,970 Public safety - - 285,893 701,818 Public works - - 330,836 79,394 Parks and recreation - - 966,308 797,124 Total expenditures 229,736 25,230 2,709,245 2,324,568 Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,238 (21,557) (1,083,605) (227,018) Other financing sources (uses): Sale of capital assets - - 46,443 25,698 Transfers in - - - 350,000 Transfers out - - - (9,453) Total other financing sources (uses)0 0 46,443 366,245 Net change in fund balance 7,238 (21,557) (1,037,162)139,227 Fund balance - January 1 (570)161,250 4,153,579 4,014,352 Fund balance - December 31 $6,668 $139,693 $3,116,417 $4,153,579 Total Nonmajor Capital Project Funds 127 - This page intentionally left blank - 128 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - CONTRIBUTION FUND Statement 25 SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Revenues: Investment earnings $ - $ - $485 $485 $704 Contributions and donations 40,000 40,000 24,870 (15,130) 41,265 Total revenues 40,000 40,000 25,355 (14,645) 41,969 Expenditures: Current: Public safety: Contractual services 53,600 53,600 21,385 32,215 54,615 Total expenditures 53,600 53,600 21,385 32,215 54,615 Net change in fund balance ($13,600) ($13,600) 3,970 ($46,860) (12,646) Fund balance - January 1 18,158 30,804 Fund balance - December 31 $22,128 $18,158 2020 Budgeted Amounts 129 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - CEMETERY FUND Statement 26 SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Revenues: Charges for services $3,700 $3,700 $13,900 $10,200 $8,950 Investment earnings 200 200 1,810 1,610 1,905 Contributions and donations - - - - 1,000 Total revenues 3,900 3,900 15,710 11,810 11,855 Expenditures: Current: General government: Contractual services 2,000 2,000 3,563 (1,563) 2,190 Total expenditures 2,000 2,000 3,563 (1,563) 2,190 Revenues over (under) expenditures $1,900 $1,900 12,147 $10,247 9,665 Fund balance - January 1 58,708 49,043 Fund balance - December 31 $70,855 $58,708 2020 Budgeted Amounts 130 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - CATV Statement 27 SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 With Comparative Actual Amounts For The Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019 Actual Variance with Actual Original Final Amounts Final Budget Amounts Revenues: Franchise fees $188,000 $188,000 $177,362 ($10,638) $185,181 Investment earnings 3,000 3,000 13,008 10,008 18,121 Total revenues 191,000 191,000 190,370 (630) 203,302 Expenditures: Current: General government: Personal services 116,400 116,400 116,105 295 114,761 Materials and supplies 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 309 Contractual services 32,300 32,300 45,635 (13,335) 55,195 Capital outlay 15,000 15,000 - 15,000 60,074 Total expenditures 168,700 168,700 161,740 6,960 230,339 Revenues over expenditures $22,300 $22,300 28,630 $6,330 (27,037) Fund balance - January 1 541,044 568,081 Fund balance - December 31 $569,674 $541,044 2020 Budgeted Amounts 131 - This page intentionally left blank - 132 III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) 133 - This page intentionally left blank - 134 III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED) This part of the City of Chanhassen’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the City of Chanhassen’s overall financial health. Contents Table Number Financial Trends These tables contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City’s financial performance and well-being have changed over time. Tables 1-4 Revenue Capacity These tables contain information to help the reader assess the City’s most significant local revenue source, the property tax. Tables 5-8 Debt Capacity These tables present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City’s current levels of outstanding debt and the City’s ability to issue additional debt in the future. Tables 9-13 Demographic and Economic These tables offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City’s financial activities take place. Tables 14-15 Operating Information These tables contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City’s financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. Tables 16-18 Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these tables is derived from the comprehensive financial reports for the relevant year. 135 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA NET POSITION BY COMPONENT Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual Basis of Accounting) 2011 2012 2013 2014 Governmental activities: Net investment in capital assets $70,866,708 $69,987,563 $71,260,946 $71,867,072 Restricted: Debt service 9,774,727 5,905,553 6,595,927 3,441,810 Park Improvements 2,516,027 1,650,118 1,714,972 1,751,739 Tax increment purposes 812,096 1,022,785 1,347,593 965,809 Other purposes 168,147 142,747 165,838 176,089 Unrestricted 8,823,980 14,544,111 13,724,705 13,877,772 Total governmental activities net position $92,961,685 $93,252,877 $94,809,981 $92,080,291 Business-type activities: Net investment in capital assets $55,430,138 $54,475,353 $52,541,451 $54,111,608 Unrestricted 9,484,947 10,631,342 11,391,338 10,467,201 Total business-type activities net position $64,915,085 $65,106,695 $63,932,789 $64,578,809 Primary government: Net investment in capital assets $126,296,846 $124,462,916 $123,802,397 $125,978,680 Restricted: Debt service 9,774,727 5,905,553 6,595,927 3,441,810 Park Improvements 2,516,027 1,650,118 1,714,972 1,751,739 Tax increment purposes 812,096 1,022,785 1,347,593 965,809 Other purposes 168,147 142,747 165,838 176,089 Unrestricted 18,308,927 25,175,453 25,116,043 24,344,973 Total primary government net position $157,876,770 $158,359,572 $158,742,770 $156,659,100 Note: GASB 65 was implemented in 2013. Unamortized bond issuance costs are no longer included within net position. Net position for years prior to 2013 was not restated. Note: GASB 68 was implemented in 2015. Net position was restated for 2014 to reflect the reporting of net pension liability and pension related deferred outflows of resources. Net position for years prior to 2014 was not restated. 136 Table 1 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $71,225,523 $72,588,940 $70,255,784 $71,053,355 $72,986,179 $73,063,927 3,455,172 1,390,127 1,400,411 1,189,447 1,283,606 564,714 1,896,923 1,505,784 1,716,043 1,224,509 1,537,790 991,872 475,357 399,178 - - - 6,668 154,810 164,751 153,633 135,024 61,995 65,965 9,510,105 10,221,704 10,028,355 8,781,660 8,360,013 9,369,203 $86,717,890 $86,270,484 $83,554,226 $82,383,995 $84,229,583 $84,062,349 $55,704,478 $57,478,975 $57,212,106 $56,195,385 $54,469,960 $55,526,666 10,032,731 10,516,316 10,126,315 12,342,280 13,557,181 11,740,521 $65,737,209 $67,995,291 $67,338,421 $68,537,665 $68,027,141 $67,267,187 $126,930,001 $130,067,915 $127,467,890 $127,248,740 $127,456,139 $128,590,593 3,455,172 1,390,127 1,400,411 1,189,447 1,283,606 564,714 1,896,923 1,505,784 1,716,043 1,224,509 1,537,790 991,872 475,357 399,178 - - - 6,668 154,810 164,751 153,633 135,024 61,995 65,965 19,542,836 20,738,020 20,154,670 21,123,940 21,917,194 21,109,724 $152,455,099 $154,265,775 $150,892,647 $150,921,660 $152,256,724 $151,329,536 137 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN NET POSITION Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual Basis of Accounting) 2011 2012 2013 2014 Expenses Governmental activities: General government $2,565,486 $2,690,853 $2,630,405 $3,099,004 Public safety 3,061,122 3,176,441 3,313,694 3,416,088 Public works 8,607,534 7,743,147 14,224,453 9,604,525 Parks and recreation 2,921,593 3,114,340 2,919,183 3,062,592 Community development 799,379 646,262 523,651 1,043,848 Interest on long-term debt 838,421 725,881 588,352 465,935 Total governmental activities expenses 18,793,535 18,096,924 24,199,738 20,691,992 Business-type activities: Water 3,581,955 3,646,787 4,702,686 3,347,965 Sewer 3,317,329 3,235,324 3,548,200 3,171,696 Surface water management 1,173,115 1,347,345 1,334,173 1,491,763 Total business-type activities expenses 8,072,399 8,229,456 9,585,059 8,011,424 Total primary government expenses $26,865,934 $26,326,380 $33,784,797 $28,703,416 Program revenues Governmental activities: Charges for services: Licenses and permits $1,381,326 $1,595,358 $2,113,770 $1,691,634 Charges for services 1,047,726 1,394,356 1,396,068 1,149,372 Franchise fees - - - - Fines and forfeits 126,571 119,997 99,984 100,516 Operating grants and contributions 692,428 404,663 472,298 532,337 Capital grants and contributions 1,646,573 2,953,496 10,718,999 3,296,748 Total governmental activities program revenues 4,894,624 6,467,870 14,801,119 6,770,607 Business-type activities: Charges for services: Water 2,611,327 3,146,886 2,829,226 2,573,027 Sewer 2,297,677 2,434,370 2,358,854 2,472,536 Surface water management 534,473 590,323 615,896 639,087 Operating grants and contributions 12,589 121,925 63,112 210,857 Capital grants and contributions 1,086,655 1,861,689 2,852,437 2,633,793 Total business-type activities program revenues 6,542,721 8,155,193 8,719,525 8,529,300 Total primary government program revenues $11,437,345 $14,623,063 $23,520,644 $15,299,907 138 Table 2 Page 1 of 2 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $2,775,663 $2,887,111 $3,230,517 $3,291,465 $2,968,604 $3,503,418 3,826,376 3,973,031 3,969,540 3,819,890 4,045,361 3,975,838 11,153,322 7,591,530 8,161,048 7,225,531 9,808,088 25,142,224 2,952,985 3,278,139 3,227,236 3,158,725 3,275,021 2,704,009 527,268 689,448 918,962 589,570 535,700 754,205 409,676 493,746 408,273 173,323 132,327 107,993 21,645,290 18,913,005 19,915,576 18,258,504 20,765,101 36,187,687 3,290,265 4,422,789 3,866,810 4,567,874 5,842,506 4,908,477 3,297,128 3,254,619 3,746,880 4,122,804 3,879,581 4,312,195 1,328,144 1,388,979 1,538,468 1,634,475 1,918,378 1,694,090 7,915,537 9,066,387 9,152,158 10,325,153 11,640,465 10,914,762 $29,560,827 $27,979,392 $29,067,734 $28,583,657 $32,405,566 $47,102,449 $1,565,900 $1,653,858 $1,641,140 $2,289,052 $2,047,190 $1,574,780 1,153,779 1,209,882 1,257,486 1,203,187 1,090,985 918,148 - - - - - 1,826,255 117,189 114,367 128,394 95,351 89,989 73,800 823,943 735,840 902,871 948,912 2,770,655 14,970,473 5,812,825 3,705,857 2,425,333 1,669,995 4,716,702 4,066,959 9,473,636 7,419,804 6,355,224 6,206,497 10,715,521 23,430,415 2,611,895 2,717,285 2,921,936 3,121,292 3,108,307 3,533,939 2,525,731 2,619,882 2,764,674 3,034,207 3,144,282 3,260,080 668,971 684,199 709,508 764,930 998,832 1,083,833 45,130 72,007 45,109 44,604 460,905 39,552 3,140,823 5,199,139 1,678,595 3,965,466 3,108,377 2,084,681 8,992,550 11,292,512 8,119,822 10,930,499 10,820,703 10,002,085 $18,466,186 $18,712,316 $14,475,046 $17,136,996 $21,536,224 $33,432,500 139 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN NET POSITION Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual Basis of Accounting) 2011 2012 2013 2014 Net (expense) revenue: Governmental activities ($13,898,911) ($11,629,054) ($9,398,619) ($13,921,385) Business-type activities (1,529,678) (74,263) (865,534) 517,876 Total primary government net (expense) revenue (15,428,589) (11,703,317) (10,264,153) (13,403,509) General revenues and other changes in net position: Governmental activities: Property taxes 9,849,882 10,064,176 10,059,324 10,482,273 Tax increment collections 566,045 533,011 545,906 307,940 Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs 28,304 20,071 19,941 19,736 Unrestricted investment earnings 505,541 173,523 (14,764) 183,602 Gain on sale of capital assets 44,000 56,610 37,720 191,755 Special item - sale of public works building - 1,246,275 - - Transfers 1,061,763 (173,420) 307,596 6,389 Total governmental activities 12,055,535 11,920,246 10,955,723 11,191,695 Business-type activities: Unrestricted investment earnings 211,707 92,453 (776) 134,533 Miscellaneous 6,643 - - - Gain on sale of capital assets - - - - Transfers (1,061,763) 173,420 (307,596) (6,389) Total business-type activities (843,413) 265,873 (308,372) 128,144 Total primary government $11,212,122 $12,186,119 $10,647,351 $11,319,839 Change in net assets: Governmental activities ($1,843,376) $291,192 $1,557,104 ($2,729,690) Business-type activities (2,373,091) 191,610 (1,173,906) 646,020 Total primary government ($4,216,467) $482,802 $383,198 ($2,083,670) 140 Table 2 Page 2 of 2 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 ($12,171,654) ($11,493,201) ($13,560,352) ($12,052,007) ($10,049,580) ($12,757,272) 1,077,013 2,226,125 (1,032,336)605,346 (819,762) (912,677) (11,094,641) (9,267,076) (14,592,688) (11,446,661) (10,869,342) (13,669,949) 10,536,216 10,643,917 10,826,116 10,877,849 10,996,831 11,745,709 200,338 111,761 - - - 236,485 21,679 19,754 19,753 19,755 20,009 - 176,731 156,202 164,393 258,456 491,345 368,168 66,248 41,129 38,254 45,244 103,976 - - - - - - - (612,078)73,032 (204,422) (319,528)283,007 239,676 10,389,134 11,045,795 10,844,094 10,881,776 11,895,168 12,590,038 132,406 79,765 171,044 263,802 548,747 390,604 - - - - - - 57,510 25,224 - 10,568 43,498 1,795 612,078 (73,032)204,422 319,528 (283,007) (239,676) 801,994 31,957 375,466 593,898 309,238 152,723 $11,191,128 $11,077,752 $11,219,560 $11,475,674 $12,204,406 $12,742,761 ($1,782,520) ($447,406) ($2,716,258) ($1,170,231) $1,845,588 ($167,234) 1,879,007 2,258,082 (656,870) 1,199,244 (510,524) (759,954) $96,487 $1,810,676 ($3,373,128)$29,013 $1,335,064 ($927,188) 141 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA FUND BALANCES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Last Ten Fiscal Years (Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting) 2011 2012 2013 2014 General Fund: Nonspendable $17,280 $57,137 $16,741 $58,333 Unassigned 5,278,118 5,434,641 5,274,584 5,550,732 Total general fund $5,295,398 $5,491,778 $5,291,325 $5,609,065 All other governmental funds: Nonspendable $12,662 $1,373,146 $1,327,068 $1,289,575 Restricted 10,426,585 6,359,422 9,181,230 5,724,419 Assigned 6,561,411 6,731,400 6,366,292 5,951,507 Unassigned (730,120) (646,856)(559,515)(475,352) Total all other governmental funds $16,270,538 $13,817,112 $16,315,075 $12,490,149 142 Table 3 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $72,114 $25,832 $81,032 $87,067 $82,265 $63,775 5,258,232 5,286,880 5,307,088 5,667,626 5,255,804 6,684,991 $5,330,346 $5,312,712 $5,388,120 $5,754,693 $5,338,069 $6,748,766 $1,253,705 $ - $990,723 $9,326 $8,781 $49,690 5,824,354 8,673,981 8,458,576 2,618,680 2,944,091 1,669,927 5,586,353 7,806,958 6,602,135 6,414,882 6,657,125 6,809,934 (372,509) (264,772) (154,506) (24,491) (570) - $12,291,903 $16,216,167 $15,896,928 $9,018,397 $9,609,427 $8,529,551 143 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Last Ten Fiscal Years 2011 2012 2013 2014 Revenues: General property taxes $9,760,052 $10,143,011 $10,176,483 $10,489,350 Tax increment collections 566,045 533,011 545,906 307,940 Licenses and permits 1,381,326 1,595,358 2,113,770 1,691,634 Intergovernmental 1,425,525 2,151,785 7,971,339 2,553,062 Franchise fees - - - - Special assessments 1,242,040 1,667,881 3,193,078 854,966 Charges for services 795,616 880,920 907,414 798,578 Fines and forfeits 126,571 119,997 99,984 100,516 Investment income 505,541 173,523 (14,764)183,602 Contributions and donations 50,685 36,893 33,159 66,918 Refunds and reimbursements 117,441 253,030 235,363 77,871 Other 846,523 264,038 259,703 265,119 Total revenues 16,817,365 17,819,447 25,521,435 17,389,556 Expenditures: Current: General government 2,162,479 2,326,490 2,274,640 2,350,437 Public safety 2,896,644 3,013,980 3,179,446 3,258,363 Public works 4,779,067 3,726,158 10,628,140 5,352,221 Parks and recreation 1,906,489 2,154,714 2,002,604 2,164,703 Community development 502,916 621,295 522,538 1,034,047 Capital outlay: General government 129,535 75,226 87,707 34,080 Public safety 52,645 39,314 74,144 23,980 Public works 2,122,641 3,502,371 2,482,728 2,894,237 Parks and recreation 309,524 1,310,366 627,214 485,107 Debt service: Principal 1,025,000 5,100,000 1,590,000 4,190,000 Interest and paying agent fees 853,152 814,621 599,487 518,722 Bond issuance costs - - - - Developer assistance 298,216 21,108 - - Total expenditures 17,038,308 22,705,643 24,068,648 22,305,897 Revenues over (under) expenditures (220,943) (4,886,196) 1,452,787 (4,916,341) Other financing sources (uses): Bonds issued - - - - Project financing - - - - Bond premium (discount) - - - - Remption of refunding bonds - - - - Transfers in 1,734,590 1,203,031 888,711 1,783,719 Transfers out - (48,881)(43,988)(676,095) Sale of capital assets - - - 301,531 Special item - sale of public works building - 1,475,000 - - Total other financing sources (uses)1,734,590 2,629,150 844,723 1,409,155 Net change in fund balance $1,513,647 ($2,257,046) $2,297,510 ($3,507,186) Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures 13.3%33.3%10.5%25.0% Debt service as percentage of total expenditures 11.0%26.0%9.1%21.1% 144 Table 4 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $10,529,994 $10,640,315 $10,820,682 $10,856,842 $10,960,876 $11,800,538 200,338 111,761 - - - 236,485 1,565,900 1,653,858 1,641,140 2,289,052 2,047,190 1,574,780 4,897,139 974,917 2,149,875 2,019,215 6,294,417 18,569,329 - - - - - 1,826,255 1,664,424 820,026 842,523 600,056 727,026 464,373 799,543 846,540 838,498 820,745 808,010 546,809 117,189 114,367 128,394 95,351 89,989 73,800 176,731 156,202 164,393 258,456 491,345 368,168 78,175 60,802 73,734 70,339 70,202 56,101 85,955 150,093 174,853 156,920 73,468 88,945 267,622 276,067 264,114 225,522 209,507 263,202 20,383,010 15,804,948 17,098,206 17,392,498 21,772,030 35,868,785 2,391,195 2,479,271 2,871,267 2,835,108 2,644,661 3,361,771 3,431,541 3,713,146 3,602,897 3,593,877 3,802,544 3,786,905 7,537,376 3,961,016 4,617,523 3,847,782 6,041,417 20,127,051 2,068,532 2,256,314 2,395,554 2,326,272 2,418,229 1,854,471 515,382 659,276 940,000 610,368 567,461 803,234 - 62,713 30,838 22,133 110,044 833,034 122,143 314,004 2,950 1,169,952 701,818 387,528 2,566,867 459,142 2,595,012 2,315,068 4,959,997 4,938,481 476,323 1,153,763 376,992 1,316,908 797,124 1,121,223 1,810,000 1,795,000 670,000 5,985,000 720,000 1,585,000 439,470 483,533 433,925 295,294 157,312 143,970 - - - - - - - - - - - - 21,358,829 17,337,178 18,536,958 24,317,762 22,920,607 38,942,668 (975,819) (1,532,230) (1,438,752) (6,925,264) (1,148,577) (3,073,883) - 4,805,000 - - - - - - - - - 546,108 - 239,773 - - - - - - - - - - 2,158,844 1,347,883 1,924,157 6,724,164 2,153,197 2,852,877 (1,701,005) (1,044,114)(748,522) (6,369,316)(855,912)(40,724) 41,015 90,318 19,286 58,458 25,698 46,443 - - - - - - 498,854 5,438,860 1,194,921 413,306 1,322,983 3,404,704 ($476,965) $3,906,630 ($243,831) ($6,511,958)$174,406 $330,821 12.4%14.8%7.1%32.2%5.4%5.5% 10.5%13.1%6.0%25.8%3.8%4.4% 145 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TAX CAPACITY VALUE AND ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Commercial/ Total Ended Residential Industrial All Tax December 31, Property Agricultural Property Other Capacity 2011 $28,951,885 $131,751 $9,778,491 $511,185 $39,373,312 2012 27,198,238 137,012 9,149,904 520,743 37,005,897 2013 26,970,557 105,160 8,927,095 541,612 36,544,424 2014 28,725,937 132,728 8,984,174 613,105 38,455,944 2015 32,778,287 153,500 9,205,053 620,620 42,757,460 2016 33,790,483 222,144 9,508,063 669,890 44,190,580 2017 34,470,607 278,224 9,910,242 764,420 45,423,493 2018 36,545,419 296,153 10,317,456 869,646 48,028,674 2019 39,891,179 191,360 10,897,809 896,937 51,877,285 2020 42,947,538 135,300 11,666,538 886,150 55,635,526 Sources: Carver County Taxpayer Services and Hennepin County 146 Table 5 Captured Tax Capacity on Fiscal Adjusted City Estimated Tax Capacity Tax Increment Disparity Tax Capacity Direct Tax Market as a Percent District Contribution Value Rate Value of EMV ($509,863) ($1,998,912) $36,864,537 26.60256 $3,350,141,800 1.10% (469,759) (2,038,437) 34,497,701 28.53211 3,153,275,000 1.09% (435,999) (1,804,630) 34,303,795 28.42838 3,118,066,700 1.10% (252,884) (1,971,928) 36,231,132 27.23862 3,294,605,000 1.10% (267,337) (1,896,611) 40,593,512 24.63317 3,686,777,200 1.10% (103,638) (2,119,400) 41,967,542 24.25249 3,802,904,100 1.10% - (2,055,461) 43,368,032 23.85464 3,899,829,200 1.11% - (2,009,509) 46,019,165 22.66614 4,112,577,100 1.12% - (2,001,778) 49,875,507 21.10456 4,444,627,000 1.12% (248,355) (2,077,771) 53,309,400 21.17559 4,749,987,200 1.12% 147 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING PROPERTY TAX CAPACITY RATES Table 6 Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Operational Debt City School Carver Year and Capital Service Total District #112 County Other Total Tax capacity rates (per $100 of adjusted tax capacity value) 2011 21.915 4.688 26.603 40.236 41.752 6.021 114.610 2012 23.701 4.831 28.532 44.382 43.562 6.681 123.158 2013 23.635 4.793 28.428 45.319 46.115 6.603 126.467 2014 22.708 4.531 27.239 44.917 45.211 6.873 124.239 2015 21.532 3.101 24.633 39.120 40.488 6.270 110.512 2016 21.314 2.938 24.252 39.245 38.880 6.417 108.795 2017 21.536 2.317 23.853 37.005 38.851 6.565 106.274 2018 20.731 1.935 22.666 33.837 37.436 6.537 100.476 2019 19.314 1.791 21.105 33.631 36.488 6.368 97.592 2020 19.484 1.692 21.176 33.006 35.179 6.101 95.463 Source: Carver County Taxpayer Services (1)The City Direct Rate is the Urban Based Rate, not including market value levies. City Direct Rate(1)Overlapping Rates 148 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS Table 7 Current Year and Nine Years Ago Percentage Percentage Taxable of Total City Taxable of Total City Capacity Capacity Capacity Capacity Taxpayer Value Rank Value Value Rank Value Istar Minnesota LLC $514,524 1 1.0% $369,750 3 1.0% SGO MN West Village LLC 459,988 2 0.9% - Northern States Power Co 449,308 3 0.8% 216,792 6 0.6% LTF Real Estate MP II LLC 379,612 4 0.7% 207,822 7 0.6% Rosemount Inc 316,160 5 0.6% 433,552 1 1.2% Lake Susan Apartment Homes LLC 310,230 6 0.6% - Chanhassen Frontier LLC 288,572 7 0.5% - LTF Real Estate Company Inc 263,590 8 0.5% - Centerpoint Energy Minnegasco 242,840 9 0.5% - PHM/Chanhassen Inc. 234,379 10 0.4% - IRET Properties - 372,872 2 1.0% LTF Real Estate VRDN I LLC - 239,202 4 0.6% DRF Chanhassen Medical Bldg - 231,502 5 0.6% Park Avenue Lofts LLC - 205,656 8 0.5% Target Corporation T-0862 - 193,250 9 0.5% Kraus-Anderson, Inc - 183,900 10 0.5% Total $3,459,203 6.4% $2,654,298 7.1% Total All Property $53,768,289 $37,501,865 Source: Carver County Taxpayer Services 20112020 149 - This page intentionally left blank - 150 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS Table 8 Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Taxes Collections Year Levied in Ended For The Percentage Subsequent Percentage December 31, Fiscal Year Amount of Levy Years Amount of Levy 2011 $10,267,390 $9,739,125 94.9% $186,353 $9,925,478 96.7% 2012 10,153,690 10,005,877 98.5% 51,796 10,057,674 99.1% 2013 10,195,890 10,105,393 99.1% 20,236 10,125,629 99.3% 2014 10,334,140 10,269,518 99.4% 28,614 10,298,132 99.7% 2015 10,484,021 10,446,765 99.6% 26,410 10,473,175 99.9% 2016 10,629,621 10,564,815 99.4% 48,775 10,613,591 99.8% 2017 10,795,121 10,718,876 99.3% 20,151 10,739,027 99.5% 2018 10,913,868 10,834,344 99.3% 48,755 10,883,099 99.7% 2019 11,019,868 10,924,102 99.1% 69,228 10,993,329 99.8% 2020 11,741,368 11,656,656 99.3% - 11,656,656 99.3% Source: City Finance Department Fiscal Year of the Levy Collected Within The Total Collections to Date 151 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE Last Ten Fiscal Years General General Fiscal Obligation Revenue Tax Increment Improvement Year Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds 2011 $16,195,000 $120,000 $840,000 $5,615,000 2012 11,475,000 - 775,000 5,420,000 2013 10,155,000 - 705,000 5,220,000 2014 9,550,000 - 635,000 1,705,000 2015 8,925,000 - - 1,155,000 2016 13,313,788 - - - 2017 12,627,803 - - - 2018 6,626,818 - - - 2019 5,890,833 - - - 2020 4,289,848 - - - Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. (1)Information pertaining to Chanhassen Personal Income is not available, information for Carver County was included instead. (a) Information not available Governmental Activities 152 Table 9 Business-Type Bonded Debt Activities Per Total Carver County Other G.O. Revenue Debt Personal Debt Bonds Total Debt Per Capita Income(1) - $20,077,339 $42,847,339 $1,849 0.8% - 20,578,313 38,248,313 1,629 0.7% - 16,324,287 32,404,287 1,353 0.6% - 10,045,261 21,935,261 899 0.4% - 9,256,235 19,336,235 784 0.3% - 13,926,719 27,240,507 1,092 0.4% - 23,379,318 36,007,121 1,425 0.5% - 25,671,988 32,298,806 1,238 0.4% - 23,755,499 29,646,332 1,125 0.4% - 28,535,933 32,825,781 1,208 (a) 153 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING Table 10 Last Ten Fiscal Years Net General General G.O. Tax G.O. G.O. Total General Less Amounts Net General Percentage Obligation Fiscal Obligation Increment Improvement Revenue Obligation Restricted for Obligation of Tax Bonded Debt Year Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonds Bonded Debt Debt Service Bonded Debt Capacity Per Capita 2011 $16,195,000 $840,000 $5,615,000 $20,077,339 $42,727,339 $16,998,401 $25,728,938 68.61% $1,110 2012 11,475,000 775,000 5,420,000 20,578,313 38,248,313 13,020,206 25,228,107 71.80%1,074 2013 10,155,000 705,000 5,220,000 16,324,287 32,404,287 10,266,366 22,137,921 63.62%924 2014 9,550,000 635,000 1,705,000 10,045,261 21,935,261 3,441,810 18,493,451 50.09%758 2015 8,925,000 - 1,155,000 9,256,235 19,336,235 3,455,171 15,881,063 38.60%644 2016 13,313,788 - - 13,926,719 27,240,507 6,418,913 20,821,594 48.72%834 2017 12,627,803 - - 23,379,318 36,007,121 6,413,214 29,593,907 67.23%1,171 2018 6,626,818 - - 25,671,988 32,298,806 1,189,446 31,109,360 66.81%1,192 2019 5,890,833 - - 23,755,499 29,646,332 1,283,606 28,362,727 56.31%1,076 2020 4,289,848 - - 28,535,933 32,825,781 564,713 32,261,067 60.00%1,187 Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. 154 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT Table 11 December 31, 2020 Estimated Estimated Share of Debt Percentage Overlapping Governmental Unit Outstanding Applicable* Debt Direct debt: City of Chanhassen(1)$4,289,848 100.00% $4,289,848 Overlapping debt: Eastern Carver County School District 178,825,000 36.94% 66,057,955 Eden Prairie Independent School District 95,033,468 0.93% 883,811 Carver County 10,650,000 31.24% 3,327,060 Hennepin County 998,790,298 0.05% 499,395 Hennepin Suburban Park District 42,954,642 0.07% 30,068 Hennepin Regional Railroad Authority 93,859,422 0.05% 46,930 Metropolitan Council 103,225,628 0.03% 30,968 Subtotal - overlapping debt 1,523,338,458 70,876,187 Total direct and overlapping debt $1,527,628,306 $75,166,035 (1)Excludes debt related to the City's business-type activities. 155 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION Table 12 Last Ten Fiscal Years Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2020 Market value $4,749,987,200 Applicable percentage 3% Debt limit 142,499,616 Debt applicable to limit: Total bonded debt 32,825,781 Less: Special assessment bonds - Tax increment bonds - Enterprise Fund debt (28,535,933) Less: Cash and investments in G.O. Bond Debt Service Fund (603,551) 3,686,297 Legal debt margin $138,813,319 Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Years 2011 Through 2020 Net Debt Net Debt Legal Amount of Debt Applicable Fiscal Debt Applicable to Debt Applicable to to Limit Year Population Limit Limit Margin Debt Limit Per Capita 2011 23,179 $100,504,254 $14,755,258 $85,748,996 14.68% $637 2012 23,484 94,598,250 10,117,347 84,480,903 10.70% 431 2013 23,954 93,542,001 8,705,958 84,836,043 9.31% 363 2014 24,388 98,838,150 8,030,953 90,807,197 8.13% 329 2015 24,655 110,603,316 7,346,583 103,256,733 6.64% 298 2016 24,951 114,087,123 6,721,445 107,365,678 5.89% 269 2017 25,273 116,994,876 6,048,333 110,946,543 5.17% 239 2018 26,088 123,377,313 5,377,482 117,999,832 4.36% 206 2019 26,335 133,338,810 4,555,132 128,783,678 3.42% 173 2020 27,170 142,499,616 3,686,297 138,813,319 2.59% 136 156 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE Table 13 Last Ten Fiscal Years Special Fiscal Assessment Year Collections Principal Interest Coverage 2011 $456,912 $190,000 $171,300 1.265 2012 625,288 195,000 165,525 1.734 2013 2,174,645 200,000 159,600 6.047 2014 119,060 3,515,000 103,875 0.033 2015 751,995 550,000 42,900 1.268 2016 6,298 1,155,000 26,175 0.005 2017 - - - - 2018 - - - - 2019 - - - - 2020 - - - - Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. Improvement bonds with a designated revenue source of special assessments were paid off in 2016. Improvement Bonds Debt Service 157 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS Table 14 Last Ten Fiscal Years Chanhassen Carver County Carver County Carver County Fiscal Chanhassen Unemployment Unemployment Personal Income Per Capita Year Population(1)Rate(2)Rate(2)(thousands)(3)Personal Income(3) 2011 23,179 4.8%5.5%$5,126,799 $55,236 2012 23,484 4.5%4.8%5,520,198 58,811 2013 23,954 4.1%4.3%5,641,039 59,001 2014 24,388 3.4%3.6%6,074,179 62,391 2015 24,655 2.9%3.2%6,377,854 64,664 2016 24,951 2.9%3.3%6,581,420 65,569 2017 25,273 2.8%2.9%6,984,354 68,395 2018 26,088 2.4%2.5%7,378,582 71,268 2019 26,355 2.5%2.8%7,655,911 72,852 2020 27,170 4.8%4.9%(a)(a) Sources:(1)Federal Census Data and Chanhassen Planning Department (2)State of Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development (3)U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (a) Information not available Note: Information pertaining to Chanhassen Personal Income and Per Capita Personal Income is not available, information for Carver County was included instead. 158 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS Table 15 Current Year and Nine Years Ago Percentage Percentage of Total City of Total City Employer Employees Rank Employment(1)Employees Rank Employment(1) Lifetime Fitness 1,464 1 23.5% 899 2 15.6% Instant Web Companies 1,157 2 18.5% 843 3 14.7% Rosemount Inc 1,067 3 17.1% 1,594 1 27.7% The Bernard Group 646 4 10.4% - Eastern Carver County Schools 465 5 7.5% 350 6 6.1% RR Donnelley 382 6 6.1% 364 5 6.3% General Mills 350 7 5.6% 288 7 5.0% Minnesota Landscape Arboretum 266 8 4.3% 243 10 4.2% Chanhassen Dinner Theatres 261 9 4.2% 250 9 4.4% Control Products 181 10 2.9% - Super Value Headquarters - 650 4 11.3% Checkpoint Systems Inc - 265 8 4.6% Total 6,239 5,746 Source: ReferenceUSA, written and telephone survey, and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. Note: This does not purport to be a comprehensive list and is based on available data obtained through a survey of individual employers, as well as the sources identified above. Some employers do not respond to inquiries for employment data. (1)The statistic for total City employment is not available, therefore the percentage represents the percentage of the top ten listed. 2020 2011 159 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years Function/Program 2011 2012 2013 2014 General government 13 13 13 13 Public safety 3 3 3 3 Public works 26 26 26 26 Parks & recreation 11 11 11 11 Community development 15 14 14 14 Total 68 67 67 67 Source: City Finance Department Full-Time Equivalent Employees as of December 31, 160 Table 16 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 13 13 13 13 13 13 322222 26 27 29 29 29 30 11 12 13 13 13 14 14 16 16 16 15 15 67 70 73 73 72 74 Full-Time Equivalent Employees as of December 31, 161 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years Function/Program 2011 2012 2013 2014 Building: Total permits issued 3,397 3,285 3,201 3,076 Total estimated value $82,991,029 $83,531,808 $89,370,069 $80,591,941 Election: Registered voters 15,326 16,916 16,916 16,344 Fire: Average number of employees 45 45 45 45 General government: Area of city - square miles 23.78 23.78 23.78 23.79 Average number of permanent full-time employees (excluding fire department)68 67 67 67 Police: Average number of employees 15 15 15 15 Number of crimes - MNCJRS(1)757 777 748 838 Number of crimes - NIBRS(1) - - - - Water: Number of customers 7,655 7,741 7,953 8,075 Daily average consumption - gallons 2,257,542 2,570,349 2,876,383 2,542,413 Plant capacity - gallons 8,550,000 8,550,000 8,550,000 8,550,000 Source: Various City Departments (1)Crime statistics in Minnesota had been reported for the last forty years utilizing Minnesota's Criminal Justice Reporting System (MNCJRS). The Federal Bureau of Investigations has mandated that all states become National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) compliant by 2019. The Carver County Sheriff's Office transitioned to NIBRS June 1, 2016. Fiscal Year 162 Table 17 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 3,266 2,891 2,981 3,085 3,259 4,528 $82,145,483 $73,881,121 $82,430,550 $136,016,287 $103,902,405 $87,160,588 16,344 17,769 17,769 17,480 17,480 19,245 45 45 45 45 45 45 23.79 23.79 23.79 23.79 23.79 23.79 67 70 73 73 72 74 15 15 15 15 15 15 870 313 - - - - - 472 737 698 692 796 8,195 8,254 8,312 8,407 8,481 8,539 2,495,868 2,565,905 2,624,486 2,888,586 2,247,455 2,677,163 8,550,000 8,550,000 8,550,000 17,100,000 17,100,000 17,100,000 Fiscal Year 163 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years Function/Program 2011 2012 2013 2014 Fire: Number of stations 2222 Parks and recreation: Acres of parks 396 401 401 405 Acres of open space 489 503 503 503 Number of shelter buildings 4444 Number of picnic shelters 5567 Number of playgrounds 26 26 27 27 Number of swimming beaches 5555 Number of tennis courts 17 15 15 15 Number of outdoor pickleball courts - 2 3 6 Police: Number of stations 1111 Public works: Miles of streets 112.0 112.6 113.5 113.7 Miles of sidewalks 31.9 31.9 31.9 32.0 Miles of trails 56.1 56.4 58.6 59.2 Sewer: Miles of storm sewers 74.5 75.3 76.5 77.0 Miles of sanitary sewers 123.7 123.9 124.3 124.5 Number of lift stations 31 31 31 31 Water: Miles of watermains 137.8 138.0 139.1 139.3 Number of wells 12 12 12 12 Source: Various City Departments Fiscal Year 164 Table 18 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 222222 405 405 466 466 466 466 503 503 528 528 628 628 444444 13 15 18 21 21 21 27 27 27 27 28 28 555555 15 15 16 16 16 16 6 6 10 10 10 10 111111 113.9 116.5 116.5 117.0 117.1 117.3 32.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 59.9 62.4 62.4 65.0 66.4 68.7 78.8 84.3 84.5 86.8 86.9 87.7 125.3 128.2 128.2 128.6 128.8 129.0 31 31 31 31 31 31 140.6 145.5 145.5 148.8 148.9 149.7 12 13 13 13 13 13 Fiscal Year 165 - This page intentionally left blank - 166 IV. OTHER INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) 167 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA COMBINED SCHEDULE OF INDEBTEDNESS December 31, 2020 Final Interest Issue Maturity Bonded indebtedness: Rates Date Date General obligation bonds: G.O. Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A 2.00%-3.10% 01/27/10 02/01/22 G.O. Bonds, Series 2016A 2.00%-3.00% 03/03/16 02/01/30 Total general obligation bonds Enterprise Fund debt: G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 0.30%-2.15% 10/06/11 02/01/22 G.O. Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2011B 2.00%-3.00% 10/06/11 02/01/25 G.O. Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 1.00%-1.55% 11/15/12 02/01/23 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2.00%-3.00% 03/03/16 02/01/26 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2016B 3.50%-4.00% 12/29/16 02/01/42 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 2.00%-4.00% 02/01/17 02/01/38 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2018A 3.00%-4.00% 03/15/18 02/01/30 G.O. Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A 2.00% - 3.00% 4/2/2020 2/1/2031 Total Enterprise Fund debt Total City bonded indebtedness 168 Exhibit 1 Payable Payable Principal Original January 1, December 31, Due in Issue Payments 2020 Issued Payments 2020 2021 $3,660,000 $2,420,000 $1,240,000 $ - $1,240,000 $ - $ - 4,805,000 330,000 4,475,000 - 345,000 4,130,000 360,000 8,465,000 2,750,000 5,715,000 0 1,585,000 4,130,000 360,000 5,920,000 4,215,000 1,705,000 - 705,000 1,000,000 725,000 3,720,000 560,000 3,160,000 - 480,000 2,680,000 500,000 1,245,000 725,000 520,000 - 125,000 395,000 130,000 1,565,000 425,000 1,140,000 - 150,000 990,000 155,000 3,630,000 - 3,630,000 - - 3,630,000 - 10,000,000 550,000 9,450,000 150,000 9,300,000 155,000 3,595,000 - 3,330,000 - 260,000 3,070,000 265,000 - - - 6,220,000 - 6,220,000 175,000 29,675,000 6,475,000 22,935,000 6,220,000 1,870,000 27,285,000 2,105,000 $38,140,000 $9,225,000 $28,650,000 $6,220,000 $3,455,000 $31,415,000 $2,465,000 Prior Years 2020 169 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS TO MATURITY Exhibit 2 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS - GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES December 31, 2020 G.O. Bonds, Series 2016A Total Bonds payable $4,130,000 $4,130,000 Future interest payable 463,100 463,100 $4,593,100 $4,593,100 Payments to maturity: 2021 452,300 452,300 2022 451,350 451,350 2023 455,025 455,025 2024 453,325 453,325 2025 458,300 458,300 2026 460,000 460,000 2027 461,500 461,500 2028 462,800 462,800 2029 468,850 468,850 2030 469,650 469,650 $4,593,100 $4,593,100 170 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA DEBT SERVICE PAYMENTS TO MATURITY Exhibit 3 GENERAL OBLIGATION REVENUE BONDS December 31, 2020 G.O. Water, G.O. Water G.O. Water G.O. Water & G.O. Water G.O. Water G.O. Water G.O. Water Sewer, & Surface Revenue Revenue Sewer Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Water Revenue Bonds, Series Bonds, Series Bonds, Series Bonds, Series Bonds, Series Bonds, Series Bonds, Series Bonds, Series 2011A 2011B 2012A 2016A 2016B 2017A 2018A 2020A Total Bonds payable $1,000,000 $2,680,000 $395,000 $990,000 $3,630,000 $9,300,000 $3,070,000 $6,220,000 $27,285,000 Future interest payable 16,119 206,700 8,807 73,775 2,766,365 3,305,350 487,575 986,449 7,851,140 $1,016,119 $2,886,700 $403,807 $1,063,775 $6,396,365 $12,605,350 $3,557,575 $7,206,449 $35,136,140 Payments to maturity: 2021 $738,163 $572,900 $134,758 $178,925 $138,238 $443,350 $355,875 $396,174 $2,958,383 2022 277,956 572,675 133,003 179,200 138,238 440,250 356,400 704,700 2,802,422 2023 - 576,925 136,046 179,325 138,238 440,500 356,625 702,975 2,530,634 2024 - 580,575 - 174,375 138,238 434,100 357,925 700,800 2,386,013 2025 - 583,625 - 175,200 138,238 432,600 354,000 703,100 2,386,763 2026 - - - 176,750 138,238 430,900 354,850 704,800 1,805,538 2027 - - - - 138,238 843,575 355,400 700,975 2,038,188 2028 - - - - 138,238 845,425 355,650 701,625 2,040,938 2029 - - - - 138,238 846,675 355,600 705,050 2,045,563 2030 - - - - 138,238 847,325 355,250 701,450 2,042,263 2031 - - - - 138,238 842,450 - 484,800 1,465,488 2032 - - - - 138,238 842,050 - - 980,288 2033 - - - - 138,238 845,975 - - 984,213 2034 - - - - 138,238 844,225 - - 982,463 2035 - - - - 138,238 841,875 - - 980,113 2036 - - - - 138,238 843,850 - - 982,088 2037 - - - - 138,238 838,150 - - 976,388 2038 - - - - 275,788 702,075 - - 977,863 2039 - - - - 943,900 - - - 943,900 2040 - - - - 943,431 - - - 943,431 2041 - - - - 939,700 - - - 939,700 2042 - - - - 943,500 - - - 943,500 $1,016,119 $2,886,700 $403,807 $1,063,775 $6,396,365 $12,605,350 $3,557,575 7,206,449 $35,136,140 171 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF DEFERRED TAX LEVIES Exhibit 4 December 31, 2020 G.O. Capital Total Years of Improvement Deferred Levy/ Plan Bonds Tax Collection of 2008A Levies 2020/2021 $479,745 $479,745 2021/2022 483,840 483,840 2022/2023 482,213 482,213 2023/2024 485,520 485,520 2024/2025 487,410 487,410 2025/2026 489,090 489,090 2026/2027 490,560 490,560 2027/2028 497,070 497,070 2028/2029 498,015 498,015 $4,393,463 $4,393,463 172 55 5th Street East, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN, 55101 www.redpathcpas.com COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Chanhassen, Minnesota We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota (the City) for the year ended December 31, 2020. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards and the Uniform Guidance, as well as certain information related to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information in our letter to you dated January 7, 2021. Professional standards also require that we communicate to you the following information related to our audit. Significant Audit Matters Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the City implemented GASB Statement No. 84, Fiduciary Activities – as a result, the Escrow Fund and Moon Valley Restoration Fund’s assets and liabilities are now reported in The City’s General Fund. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the proper period. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimate affecting the City’s financial statements were management’s estimate of the portion of construction projects which will be capitalized and the estimates of net pension liability and related deferred inflows/outflows and the OPEB liability. Estimates relating to construction projects are based on feasibility reports and estimates of the City Engineer. Estimates relating to City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Communication With Those Charged With Governance Page 2 the net pension liability and OPEB liability are based on actuarial studies. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop these estimates in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Certain financial statement disclosures are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statement users. Determining sensitivity is subjective, however, we believe the disclosures most likely to be considered sensitive are Note 8 – Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Note 11 – Other Postemployment Benefits. The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. There were no uncorrected misstatements that have an effect on our opinion on the financial statements. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit’s financial statements taken as a whole. Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor’s report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. Management Representations We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated June 9, 2021. Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Communication With Those Charged With Governance Page 3 consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City’s financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Other Audit Findings or Issues We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City’s auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. Other Matters We applied certain limited procedures to the management’s discussion and analysis, the budgetary comparison information, and the schedules of OPEB and pension information, which are required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI. We were engaged to report on the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and schedules which accompany the financial statements but are not RSI. With respect to this supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves. We were not engaged to report on the introductory section, the statistical section or the other information, which accompany the financial statements but are not RSI. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it. City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Communication With Those Charged With Governance Page 4 Restriction on Use This information is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council and management of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota and is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD. St. Paul, Minnesota June 9, 2021 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORTS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 - This page intentionally left blank - CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 1 Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance and Report on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance 3 Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards 6 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs 7 Legal Compliance Report 9 - This page intentionally left blank - 55 5th Street East, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN, 55101 www.redpathcpas.com INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Chanhassen, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 9, 2021. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. 1 55 5th Street East, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN, 55101 www.redpathcpas.com Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. Purpose of This Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD. St. Paul, Minnesota June 9, 2021 2 55 5th Street East, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN, 55101 www.redpathcpas.com INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE AND REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE To The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program We have audited the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s major federal program for the year ended December 31, 2020. The City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s major federal program is identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Management’s Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of its federal awards applicable to its federal programs. Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota‘s major federal program based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Those standards and the Uniform Guidance require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s compliance. 3 Opinion on the Major Federal Program In our opinion, the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its major federal program for the year ended December 31, 2020. Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. 4 Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota’s basic financial statements. We have issued our report thereon dated June 9, 2021, which contained unmodified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming our opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the basic financial statements. The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is presented for the purposes of additional analysis as required by the Uniform Guidance and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. Purpose of This Report The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD. St. Paul, Minnesota June 9, 2021 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 Federal Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor CFDA Pass-Through Entity Federal Pass-through to Program or Cluster Title Number Identifying Number Expenditures Subrecipients U.S. Department of Treasury Passed through State of Minnesota Department of Revenue: COVID-19 - Coronavirus Relief Fund 21.019 None noted 1,978,887$ 146,184$ Total U.S. Department of Treasury 1,978,887 146,184 Total Federal Expenditures 1,978,887$ 146,184$ Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards: Note 1 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (the Schedule) presents the activity of federal award programs expended by the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota under programs of the federal government for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the Schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, it is not intended to and does not present the financial positions, or change in financial position of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. The expenditures on this Schedule are on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Pass-through entity identifying numbers are presented where available. Note 2 Indirect Costs The City did not elect to use the 10% de minimis indirect cost rate for indirect (F&A) costs. 6 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 SECTION I - SUMMARY OF AUDIT RESULTS Financial Statements A. Type of auditors’ report issued:Unmodified B. Internal control over financial reporting:  Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No  Significant deficiencies identified that are not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X None reported C. Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? Yes X No Federal Awards D. Internal control over major programs:  Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No  Significant deficiencies identified that are not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X None reported E. Type of auditors’ report issued on compliance for major programs: Unmodified F. Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards? Yes X None reported G. Identification of major programs: Name of Federal Program CFDA Number COVID-19 – Coronavirus Relief Fund 21.019 H. Dollar threshold used to distinguish between Type A and Type B programs: $750,000 I. Auditee qualified as a low-risk auditee: Yes X No 7 CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS For The Year Ended December 31, 2020 SECTION II – FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS There were no financial statement findings for 2020. SECTION III – FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS There were no federal award findings for 2020 SECTION IV – PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS None. FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS None. A single audit was not required to be performed during the prior year. 8 55 5th Street East, Suite 1400, St. Paul, MN, 55101 www.redpathcpas.com MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE REPORT To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Chanhassen, Minnesota We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 9, 2021. In connection with our audit, we noted that the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, failed to comply with provisions of the claims and disbursements section of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 6.65, insofar as they relate to accounting matters as described in the Schedule of Findings and Responses as item 2020-001. Also, in connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota failed to comply with the provisions of the contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing sections of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, insofar as they relate to accounting matters. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions, insofar as they relate to accounting matters. The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD. St. Paul, Minnesota June 9, 2021 9 - This page intentionally left blank - 10 City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Minnesota Legal Compliance Report Schedule of Findings and Responses 2020-001 Annual Delegation of Authority to Make Electronic Funds Transfers Criteria: Minnesota Statutes require an annual delegation of authority to make electronic funds transfers to a chief financial officer or the officer’s designee. Condition: During our audit testing, we discovered that the City did not make the annual electronic fund transfers delegation in 2020. Cause: Unknown. Effect: The effect of noncompliance is not determinable. Recommendation: We recommend that the City annually delegate authority to make electronic funds transfers to the appropriate individual. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: In the past the City has regularly approved an annual delegation at the first meeting of the year; however, the item was inadvertently omitted in 2020. The City has corrected the process for 2021 and the delegation of authority was approved. 11 - This page intentionally left blank - 12 City of Chanhassen, Minnesota 2020 Audit Review June 28, 2021 David Mol, CPA Partner 1 Reports Issued by Auditor Opinion on the Fair Presentation of the Financial Statements Report on Internal Controls Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance Report on Federal Program Compliance Communication to Those Charged with Governance 2 Opinion on Financial Statements What did we do? •Plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and presented in accordance with Accounting Standards. How did we do it? •Audit Standards –GAAS (AICPA) –GAGAS (GAO) What is the result? •A “clean” or Unmodified opinion was issued on the 2020 financial statements. 3 Excellence in Financial Reporting 4 The City has received this award for 28 consecutive years. The Award demonstrates the City’s commitment to preparing Financial Statements that are comprehensive, transparent and consistent with Accounting standards. Report on Internal Controls What did we do? •We gained an understanding of internal controls in place and their effectiveness in order to design our audit procedures •Data mining •Deficiencies in internal control that are identified are discussed with management and reported to the City Council. What is the result? •No findings on internal control over financial reporting. 5 Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance What did we do? •Determine the City has complied with certain Minnesota Statutes / Laws that pertain to financial transactions •Followed the audit guide published by the Office of the State Auditor. The guide consists of seven sections: –Conflicts of interest -Public Indebtedness –Contracting bid laws -Claims and disbursements –Miscellaneous provisions -Tax increment –Depositories of public funds and investments How did we do it? •Select sample of transactions to test for compliance with statutory provisions. What is the result? •One item noted regarding delegation of authority to make electronic funds transfers. 6 Report on Federal Program Compliance What did we do? •Determine the City has complied with various requirements of federal programs (Coronavirus Relief Fund-$1,978,887). •Federal programs have up to twelve areas of compliance –Activities allowed, allowable costs, period of availability, procurement and suspension and debarment, reporting, special tests and provisions How did we do it? •Select sample of transactions to test for compliance with statutory provisions. What is the result? •No findings of noncompliance. 7 Communication to Those Charged with Governance Accounting policies used and/or changed. •GASB No. 84 regarding Fiduciary Activities –eliminated Agency Funds Accounting estimates in the financial statements. •Capitalization of construction projects •OPEB liability ($168,000) •Net pension liability –City’s proportionate share of PERA’s net pension liability ($4,706,000) –Fire Relief net pension liability ($540,000) No difficulties encountered in performing the audit. Financial statement adjustments identified during the audit No disagreements with management. Other matters •More changes in accounting standards on the way. 8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 28, 2021 Subject Approve a Request for a Two­Foot Height Variance for an Accessory Structure on Property Located at 6300 Hummingbird Road Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2021­10 PROPOSED MOTION The Chanhassen City Council approves a two­foot accessory structure height variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. 1. The applicant shall provide revised plans that accurately reflect the constructed building. 2. The applicant shall schedule and receive a final inspection. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a two­foot height variance to allow them to keep the accessory structure as constructed. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 15, 2021.  The Planning Commission felt that the building height fit in with the character of the neighborhood, was not opposed by any neighbors, would eventually become moot when the applicant demolishes the existing house and constructs a new house on the property, tied in to the detached garage, and that potential site grading alterations, which could have brought the property into compliance with Code, would have been a sub­optimal solution.  The Planning Commission voted four for and two against a motion to approve the height variance.  Since the Board of Appeals and Adjustment decision must be by an affirmative vote of three­fourths of the members present, the Board's motion acts as a recommendation to City Council. Mr. Mark Sass spoke before the Commission.  He said that the neighborhood was supportive of the request. The Planning Commission draft minutes are attached. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments recommends approval of the variance request. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, June 28, 2021SubjectApprove a Request for a Two­Foot Height Variance for an Accessory Structure on PropertyLocated at 6300 Hummingbird RoadSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2021­10PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council approves a two­foot accessory structure height variance, subject to the conditions ofapproval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.1. The applicant shall provide revised plans that accurately reflect the constructed building.2. The applicant shall schedule and receive a final inspection.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe applicant is requesting a two­foot height variance to allow them to keep the accessory structure as constructed.BACKGROUNDThe Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 15, 2021.  The Planning Commission felt that the buildingheight fit in with the character of the neighborhood, was not opposed by any neighbors, would eventually becomemoot when the applicant demolishes the existing house and constructs a new house on the property, tied in to thedetached garage, and that potential site grading alterations, which could have brought the property into compliancewith Code, would have been a sub­optimal solution.  The Planning Commission voted four for and two against amotion to approve the height variance.  Since the Board of Appeals and Adjustment decision must be by an affirmativevote of three­fourths of the members present, the Board's motion acts as a recommendation to City Council.Mr. Mark Sass spoke before the Commission.  He said that the neighborhood was supportive of the request.The Planning Commission draft minutes are attached.RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments recommends approval of the variance request. ATTACHMENTS: Findings of Fact and Decision CC (Approval) Variance Document Draft Minutes from the June 15, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report Finding of Fact and Decision ­ PC Approval ­ Signed Findings of Fact and Decision ­ PC Denial Development Review Application Narrative Plan Sheets Affidavit of Mailing \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\plan\2021 planning cases\21-10 6300 hummingbird road var\findings of fact and decision - approval cc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Armenak Petrosian for a two-foot height variance for an accessory structure on property at 6300 Hummingbird Road, zoned Single-Family Residential District, RSF – Planning Case #2021-10. On June 28, 2021, the City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Armenak Petrosian for a two-foot height variance for an accessory structure. The City Council conducted a hearing on the proposed variance. City Council makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 5, Block 1, Murray Hill Replat of 17 and 18. 4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The applicant is proposing to increase the permitted height of an accessory structure by two feet. While accessory structures are limited in height, the applicant has constructed the accessory structure to fit in with a future reconstruction of the home on the property. By adding a second story, the applicant has prepared this structure for the future home. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties", as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\plan\2021 planning cases\21-10 6300 hummingbird road var\findings of fact and decision - approval cc.doc Finding: The property owner could construct an accessory structure that complies with ordinance, but it would not lend itself to a future connection to a reconstructed home on the property and would require significant modification to be connected to a future two- story home. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance would allow the applicant to keep the constructed accessory building. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The reconstruction of the home is a timing issue for the applicant since the home is currently occupied by his father. Rather than having him move while a new home is constructed. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The variance will permit the applicant to keep the accessory structure, which is permitted on properties zoned RSF. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This condition does not apply. 5. The planning report #2021-10, dated June 15, 2021, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The Chanhassen City Council approves the two-foot accessory structure height variance subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall provide revised plans that accurately reflect the constructed accessory structure. b. The applicant shall schedule and receive a final inspection. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 28th day of June, 2021. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA VARIANCE 2021-10 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants the following variance: The Chanhassen City Council approves a two-foot accessory structure height variance. 2. Property. The variance is for a property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota, and legally described as Lot 5, Block 1, Murray Hill Replat of 17 and 18, Carver County, MN. 3. Conditions. The variance approval is subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall provide revised plans that accurately reflect the constructed accessory structure. b. The applicant shall schedule and receive a final inspection. 4. Lapse. If within one (1) year of the issuance of this variance the allowed construction has not been substantially completed, this variance shall lapse. 2 Dated: June 28, 2021 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: (SEAL) Elise Ryan, Mayor AND: Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2021 by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Laurie Hokkanen, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-10 6300 hummingbird road var\variance document 2021-10.doc CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JUNE 15, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman von Oven called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Laura Skistad, Eric Noyes, Mark von Oven, Erik Johnson, Doug Reeder, and Kelsey Alto MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Weick STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner PUBLIC HEARINGS: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A TWO-FOOT HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6300 HUMMINGBIRD ROAD Senior Planner Generous presented the staff report on this item. He noted the applicant is Armenak Petrosian and said this is the public hearing and if the item is appealed or does not meet the 75% standard it goes forward to the City Council and is scheduled for June 28, 2021. The specific request is a 2-foot height variance for an accessory structure. City Code permits a 20- foot accessory structure height and this garage/accessory building is 24 feet with a 22-foot height based on City dynamics. 6300 Hummingbird Road is zoned single-family residential and is a .82-acre lot; setbacks are 30-foot front and rear with 10 feet on the side. In 2019 the applicant applied to build a 768-square foot one story (approximately 15-foot tall) accessory structure to replace an existing structure on site. After beginning construction, the applicant modified his plans to a two-story design and completed the building. When the City’s Building Official went out, they discovered that the building was too tall and the applicant was advised to come in and go through the variance process. The applicant would like to keep this building as it is constructed. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission deny the variance request and require the applicant to revise the plan and reconstruct the structure to meet ordinance requirements. However, if the Planning Commission would like to grant the variance, an alternate motion is also provided. Commissioner Reeder asked if this garage was built as part of an existing house, would it be too tall? Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 2 Mr. Generous replied no, it would not. If it was part of the principal structure, then the height goes up to 35 feet. He noted he has had several phone calls regarding this item and were all in support of approving the variance request. Armenak Petrosian has lived in Chanhassen for 40 years and owns 6300 Hummingbird Road, which is where his in-laws live. He said it is just as Mr. Generous stated and he never imagined going over and beyond what is required within the City. He made a mistake and is here to answer any questions. Commissioner Noyes asked if Mr. Petrosian did the construction himself or had a contractor working with him. Mr. Petrosian replied he constructed the first floor himself; he poured the concrete himself, and the second floor he did not as he was sick and hired someone to do it for him. It is a typical 10- foot garage with an 8-foot floor and 5:12 pitch which corresponds to the roofline and they were trying to match and blend. Commissioner Noyes asked if Mr. Petrosian is allowed to keep the structure, can he explain future construction plans of tying it into the house. Mr. Petrosian replied the reason he changed the original plans is because he and his wife spoke and eventually, they may want to construct a property there. Whatever they build now, whatever the original roofline was will not fit into the future property because there is not going to be a second floor. Commissioner Reeder asked the timeframe for building on the property. Mr. Petrosian does not know as his father-in-law is 88 years old and he wishes him a long life. Commissioner Reeder would be willing to allow the variance if the Applicant will actually do what he says he would do and perhaps even delay the requirement that he remove it by a couple of years to allow the time to do that and take out a building permit. However, if it is totally indefinite, then he has a problem. Mr. Petrosian said, unfortunately, it depends on when his in-laws both pass away. At that time, the front will be demolished and they will rebuild. Commissioner von Oven asked if the Planning Commission denied the variance, what of the available options has he explored and what will he do? Mr. Petrosian said he does not have many options. He tried to build something that will suit his family and there was no intent to harm anyone, the neighbors, or not comply with the City requirements. The alternative would be to demolish the house and he clarified the second floor in Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 3 order to comply with the requirements. In order to comply he would need to make the roof almost flat. Commissioner von Oven asked if Mr. Petrosian referred to the outbuilding as the house because his in-laws are living in the outbuilding? Mr. Petrosian replied no, his in-laws are living in the house. Commissioner Noyes asked if the original plan had 8-foot walls and the applicant changed them to 10-foot walls. Mr. Petrosian said no, they were 10 feet on the bottom. Commissioner Noyes said Mr. Petrosian changed the pitch of the roof. Mr. Petrosian noted he added the second floor and custom trusses but it was just a very high- pitched roof. Commissioner Noyes asked when he added the roof, he did not make the outside walls taller? Mr. Petrosian said no. Commissioner Noyes clarified Mr. Petrosian put in a different truss. Instead of having a triangle truss there is more of a 5-sided truss that allows a room above. Vice Chair von Oven opened the public hearing. Mark Sass, a former contractor, noted Mr. Petrosian is a great neighbor and built it right. All of the neighbors around, as far as he knows, have no complaint whatsoever and Mr. Petrosian did a lot of work with the neighbor to the north to grade and get things so that it feels good. His question is, what is the solution? Butcher the building – it is a really nice, solid structure – whether he built a new house in the back and all these future dreams, who knows where they are? He knows this is a precedent but noted they are all okay with it. If there is anything Mr. Sass can do, he is happy to help, he has worked with the City for 40 years and knows all the inspections, etc. Vice Chair von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Reeder asked staff if they looked at what the options would be if the application is denied. Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 4 Mr. Generous replied as Mr. Petrosian pointed out, he could lower the roof or raise the grade around it so it is not as high. He noted mostly it is in the building construction and they would have to change the height of the roof peak. Commissioner Reeder asked if the idea of making the ground level higher is feasible or not. Mr. Generous went out to the property and on the west side of the structure it is actually much higher. Mr. Petrosian could alter the grade and it would fit in with his future house plan if he were to do that. Commissioner Reeder asked Mr. Petrosian if he could do that. Mr. Petrosian replied he is not an engineer and cannot speak to the construction business. To his understanding, raising the ground around the garage is not really going to give him anything as then he has to raise the floor of the garage, as well. Otherwise, he will be unable to get into the garage. Associate Planner Young-Walters said technically the way the ordinance reads, grade is measured from highest adjoining grade to mid-point of the highest of the highest gable. Hypothetically that means if on several sides of the structure the grade was two feet higher than it was on, say, the front of the structure where the entrance was, they would measure from the highest grade not the lowest grade. The only exemption to that is if there is more than a 10-foot change in elevation in which case they use lowest grade plus ten. It is arguably using the letter of the Code to defeat the spirit, but in theory it would meet Code. Engineering would have to decide if the drainage would work. Commissioner Alto clarified that would not affect the aesthetics of the building at all so why would they make them add more dirt to one side. She would rather just approve the variance. Mr. Petrosian said actually he already has two feet on one side of the garage because his neighbor has always had a problem with drainage. Mr. Petrosian added two feet between them so the water comes to him and he has drainage all the way to the street. He can add more to it if that will satisfy the requirements. Mr. Young-Walters noted it is theoretically possible. Commissioner Noyes noted that precedence is the whole issue here, and Mr. Petrosian does not have good alternatives. In plenty of other municipalities it has migrated towards - rather than asking permission up front - people asking for forgiveness after the fact. He thinks they are trying to avoid that in Chanhassen. Now if someone reads the minutes or sees the video of this, they may think they know how to get around this for the next time and that person will say the City approved it before. Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 5 The Planning Commission discussed adjusting the grade of the property and the City Code. Mr. Generous clarified the Planning Commission could tell Mr. Petrosian to go back and make changes to the site to bring it into compliance then a variance is not necessary. That way it avoids all the issues of precedent because they are bringing it into compliance with ordinance. Vice Chair von Oven is a proponent of not setting these types of precedents. He noted the mistake was made during the pandemic, not one of the neighbors has complained given the chance – Mr. von Oven clarified if something else were to come before this Commission similar to this, all it would take for him is one neighbor to complain. He noted the combination of neighbors speaking on Mr. Petrosian’s behalf and seeing pictures, it is definitely not out of place, although it is out of place in the Code and staff did exactly the right thing recommending denial. He is trying to talk himself into the fact that this will not necessarily be a precedent and seeing if they can approve. Commissioner Skistad seconded Vice Chair von Oven as those are fair points. After the year that everyone has gone through, making exceptions like this and then determining future cases is case-by-case and facts are different every time. Vice Chair von Oven added Mr. Petrosian’s first statement that in Chanhassen they have a shortage of senior living and this house is being occupied by seniors who have a fantastic place to live on behalf of their son-in-law and daughter. Although they cannot ride on that alone, the combination of all these factors gives him something to say to the next applicant who would truly come in and say they found a way around the system. Commissioner Reeder asked if they should table this and allow the applicant to look at the option of moving the dirt around to see if it is feasible rather than denying it. Commissioner Noyes thought about that same option and the other thing the Commission must keep in mind is that if they deny, Mr. Petrosian has the chance to go before the Council and make the same case and they may have a decision to grant the variance. The applicant is not dead in the water if they table it or vote to deny the variance as written. He still looks at moving dirt around as a band-aid. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner von Oven seconded, that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approve the requested two-foot height variance for an accessory structure subject to the following conditions: 1. the Applicant shall provide revised plans that accurately reflect the constructed accessory structure and 2. the Applicant shall schedule and receive a final inspection. The motion carried with a vote of 4 to 2. Ayes 4, Nays 2 (Reeder, Noyes). Mr. Generous clarified the motion passes but the 75% rule does not, so this acts as a recommendation to City Council. On June 28, 2021 it will go before the City Council. Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 6 CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A FENCE VARIANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 931 LAKE SUSAN HILLS DRIVE Senior Planner Generous noted this property is a corner lot and the applicant, Alec McKinley, is requesting a variance to put up a privacy fence in what the City Code defines as his front yard. On corner lots the front yard is designated by where the garage is located for access purposes. The property is part of the Lake Susan Hills PUD and is a typical lot of .34 acres with 30-foot front and rear setbacks and 10-foot side setbacks. Staff suggested line of sight triangles so those on the sidewalk can be clearly seen. Staff is recommending approval of the variance request for the six-foot fence and what is designated as the front property subject to the conditions in the staff report which are the site triangles being preserved. Alec and Amy McKinley live at 931 Lake Susan Hills Drive, and said the privacy fence purpose is two-fold for security for their children and for privacy. He noted there is no intention of creating a security threat by rolling their cars out the driveway and injuring anyone, so they understand the site lines and adamantly support that. Commissioner Noyes asked the McKinley’s if the staff suggestions are acceptable to them. Mr. McKinley noted they did not have intention of running the fence right down the property line to the sidewalk but pushing it back a bit. He said 30 feet is pretty big for a site view next to his driveway and he understands that goes with City Code, but if that is what it will take for them to get their fence, they would go for it. Vice Chair von Oven opened the public hearing. Vice Chair von Oven closed the public hearing. Commissioner Skistad moved, Commissioner Noyes seconded, that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance to construct a six-foot fence along West Lake Drive, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached findings of facts and decision. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE INTERIM USE PERMIT TO REMOVE THE CONDITION REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF DRIVING RANGE NETS Associate Planner Young-Walters stated this is a continuation of Planning Case 2021-02, the resumption of the golf zone use at 825 Flying Cloud Drive. The applicants, Brian and Keri Colvin, are requesting that Condition 9 from the Interim Use Permit (IUP) be removed, which is the condition requiring the installation of driving range nets, particularly the nets across the back of the golf zone driving range. Mr. Young-Walters refreshed the Commissioners on the location, noting it is zoned A2 – Agricultural Estate and is guided in the 2040 land use plan for office and Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 7 agricultural use. The site is just under 100 acres in size and is currently operating as a golf driving range under IUP 2021-02. Mr. Young-Walters gave a short background on the driving range including amendments, noting it closed down in 2018 and per City Code after 6 months of inactivity the original IUP permit expired. In January 2021, the City Council approved the resumption of use under a new IUP and had a condition that nets be installed by June 14, 2021. This is what the applicant is asking relief from and has stated they want to be allowed to operate the driving range without installing the rear nets as the wetlands are approximately 400 yards away and golfers cannot hit balls further than 300 yards. They also machine and hand-pick balls daily and the previous driving range had not utilized rear nets for 10 years of its operation, a 2020 site visit did not find stray balls, and the applicant has stated if they observe balls in the wetlands, they will voluntarily install the nets. He believes the applicant is still intending to have the side nets present. Staff’s position is that wetland boundaries are not always obvious. The most recent wetland delineation in 1998 expired (wetland delineations are good for three years), showed that the wetland boundary at the time was 275 yards rather than 400 yards from the concrete bunkers where the driving occurs. In the staff report, the Water Resources Coordinator noted that there is significant concern with equipment being operated regularly near and within the wetland and within the wetland buffer. One of the big reasons staff did not require the applicant to get a new delineation when this IUP came through to be resumed is because staff had been under the understanding that the nets would be installed at 230 yards which provides 45 yards of cushion between the last known edge of the wetland and where they would reasonably expect balls to travel. Without the nets, staff is very concerned about ball-picking equipment being used within wetland buffer areas and near the wetland. Staff is recommending denial and that the condition of nets being installed be retained. The applicant is a little confused. He understood that his nets were required to be put in the back; he did not realize that they were talking about side nets and all. From their hitting area, using multiple GPS units off of mats in the hitting stalls within the facility, it is 375 yards right to the edge of the weed line. The wetlands start roughly about 400 feet in. They have two ball picking machines that drive in the center of the driving range to pick the balls. On the outside where the poles would be at the 230-yard mark, they have 5-6 employees every day that do a clean pick by hand; every ball is picked off that property before they go home at night. Mr. Colvin clarified the machine is not driving anywhere near the wetlands. He did not know they were also talking about putting nets up on the sides and stated on the west side; he has not measured the wetlands as they never planned on putting nets on that side because the land goes so far over before hitting the woods – Tiger Woods could not even hit a ball into the wetlands over on that side. He showed an overhead map and explained the distances and wetlands. Commissioner Skistad asked where they hit the balls in looking at the map. Mr. Colvin replied they hit from the building and within the blue boundary marked on screen. Commissioner Alto asked if Mr. Colvin ever intended to put up any nets, whether on the back or the side. Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 8 Mr. Colvin said after owning, maintaining, and watching for 60 days, he realized that nobody can hit into these wetlands. The previous owner did not have nets, as they had deteriorated, for the last 10 years. Commissioner Alto said wouldn’t the nets also prevent wildlife and birds from crossing the path of the balls if the nets were there. Mr. Colvin replied yes. Commissioner Noyes stated they probably could have issues both ways that the nets would cause issues with the birds. Associate Planner Young-Walters clarified that Condition 9 requires that the nets be installed in compliance with DNR guidelines in 1998. The DNR specified a minimum of a 4.5-foot clearance for the nets as well as maximum heights so that they would not interfere with migrating birds or any animals passing through. Mr. Colvin said having the nets start 4.5-5 feet above the ground and go up actually defeats the whole purpose of having nets. Most balls, about 80-90% that are coming out at 230 yards are already dropping and rolling underneath that 4.5-foot net. Commissioner Reeder asked why Mr. Colvin does not want to put the net up. Mr. Colvin replied he does not feel there is any need for it as none of the balls are entering the wetlands from the hitting area and it is an expense that as a new business owner he does not want to cover if there is no need for it. As far as everything else, he was given a maintenance list by the City and took care of that, they did the landscaping, put in a rain garden and he felt that was all necessary and was taken care of within 30 days. Mr. Colvin feels like the nets are unnecessary and very costly. Vice Chair von Oven asked how costly the nets are. Mr. Colvin was under the assumption they were putting the nets just in the back. He had one bid just for the back and that was $32,000. He had two other bids for the back and one came in at $28,000 and another at $30,000; out of curiosity he asked for a bid on what it would cost for the nets to go around the whole perimeter and one came in at $89,000 and the other came in at $97,000. Vice Chair von Oven opened the public hearing. Vice Chair von Oven closed the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 9 Commissioner Skistad said 4.5 feet off the ground does not make sense to her either. It seems that the regulation does not make logical sense and perhaps they should review it. Commissioner Johnson asked if the 4.5 feet is a regulation or if that is just how they install the nets. Commissioner Skistad noted it is the DNR because they want to let animals through. She said if they let animals through, they also let golf balls through. Mr. Young-Walters said from going through the meeting minutes in the 1990’s, the original net discussion was a balancing act. There was concern about balls traveling into the wetlands, and they have a wetland alteration permit because part of the driving range that is no longer in use went into the wetland at 255 yards. He noted a portion of about 18,000 square feet on screen that was filled in order to allow for the driving range. Staff had been very concerned about long shots going deep into that buffer area and into the wetlands and the compromise was with the nets there a person who hits a high and far ball would be caught by the nets. He noted some will roll further but the goal is to keep them from hitting the wetland. In regards to the location of the wetland, Mr. Young-Walters understands what the applicant is saying, however, one cannot identify a wetland just based on surface vegetation. A certified delineator must come out, take soil samples, look at type of soils, hydrology, etc., to know where that boundary is. The last delineation done at this site showed it at 275 feet out from the bunker. He noted wetlands move and without a new delineation there is no way to know if it has moved closer, further back, or zig-zagged around. Mr. Colvin commented regarding a high shot near the 255, to reach that would actually be a 255- yard carry. For those who do not golf, the average PGA Tour player has a 255–275-yard carry, which is impossible for anybody to come to his facility make that let alone total that out. He took all those facts from TrackMan Technology, a database that takes information in from every Tour player. Keri Colvin stated the last City inspection was in 2014 and the nets were not up then. The previous owner closed it in 2018 and Mr. Young-Walters did a complete walkthrough of the property prior to the IUP. Looking back at the previous City Council and Planning Commission minutes, they could not find a single golf ball out in the wetlands or in the woods. The facility had not had nets up for over 10 years at that point. Mr. Young-Walters clarified that inspection was done by himself, a Water Resource Coordinator, and the City Arborist. They did not do an intensive search, they walked out maybe 20-30 yards beyond the end of the poles which is the 230-yard point. In looking at the aerials in 2019, waters were up to the 230-yard pole so anything that would have been there from 2018, beyond that point would not have been there when they conducted that walk through. Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 10 Commissioner Reeder clarified this requirement for the fence was put in the last time they approved it. Mr. Young-Walters replied this was one of the conditions on the 1998 IUP and was one of the conditions they informed the applicant they would be keeping for the reissued permit and was upheld at City Council when they reissued the permit. Commissioner Reeder asked if the applicant knew that. Mr. Young-Walters said the applicant was given the initial IUP and was told they would be maintaining all conditions and was advised to familiarize himself with it. There was extensive discussion on this condition when he asked for an extension on implementing it before the City Council meeting where this was approved. Commissioner Reeder asked Mr. Colvin if he did not understand that he had to do this or if he did not cost it out. Mr. Colvin understood, he knew the list of things that he had to do. Everything else from the City that was requested he completely agrees with, however, once they had the facility open for 60 days, he realized that it just does not make sense to put these nets up because nobody can hit balls anywhere into these wetlands. As a new business owner this is a very costly addition and if it does not have to be put in, he simply does not want to. It is a lot of money to put these nets in to stop pretty much zero balls that would go into the wetlands. Also, to start them 4.5 feet seems like he is really wasting everyone’s time and money. Commissioner Reeder noted it was not in Mr. Colvin’s original business plan to put the nets up. Mr. Colvin replied when he purchased the facility, he never planned on putting nets up as there had not been nets up there in the last 10 years. Commissioner Reeder stated it said in the permit Mr. Colvin received that he had to. Mr. Colvin understands that part. After owning the facility for 60 days he decided to go back to the Planning Commission and City Council and ask them to amend the request of the netting because no one can reach the wetlands. Commissioner Noyes asked Mr. Young-Walters if the DNR is driving the requirement for the netting in the original permit. If the DNR was sitting here right now, would they say they are not really concerned about this. Mr. Young-Walters replied unfortunately the DNR did not respond to either of the interjurisdictional requests which puts him in an awkward position in trying to speak for them. In reviewing the letter, the DNR sent to the City in 1998, his understanding is that the City was Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 11 primarily concerned about balls moving into the flood plain and wetland and the DNR was primarily concerned with the animal migrations and wildlife not being impacted. Commissioner Noyes would love to go back and say there have not been nets in the previous 10 years of operation but he does not think that holds a lot of water; just because they were non- compliant does not mean they can be non-compliant going forward. He thinks it is valuable to understand why they would be requesting the fencing, whether it is the City or the DNR. Commissioner Alto noted they also do not have proof that the 10 years without nets did not have an impact, there is just no physical evidence that they can see right now. She said 60 days of being open and not having an impact – the wetlands are not able to speak for themselves in this matter – and if the DNR and the City also thinks it is best, she has to side with them. Vice Chair von Oven asked from a historical perspective, what was the order? Did Mr. Colvin purchase the property and then come to the City for the IUP renewal? Or did he obtain the renewal and then make the decision to purchase the property? Mr. Colvin replied they purchased the property and then came for the renewal of the IUP. Mr. Young-Walters clarified he believes they met before Mr. Colvin finalized the purchase to go over the 1998 IUP and to discuss whether or not the City would be amenable to reissuing it. Vice Chair von Oven said Mr. Colvin had a good feeling that by purchasing the property that he would have a path through the City. Mr. Colvin replied yes. Commissioner Alto moved, Commissioner Reeder seconded, that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council deny the Applicant’s request to remove Condition 9 from the IUP 2021-02. Commissioner Noyes has a hard time voting to deny because he does not know why it is required to have the nets, yet. He really wants to know if the DNR is the one pushing this because of the wetland issue. At this point in time, he would vote against the motion to deny and perhaps recommend they get more information related to the origin of the netting requirement. Vice Chair von Oven has gone back-and-forth on this one and he stated this is clearly not a surprise for the owners. He does not think one purchases a driving range anywhere around a City and thinks that they may not have to get some nets. He also agrees and he is not sure these nets are serving the purpose that was intended. At the end of the day taking the facts and saying if the right thing to do is eliminate the need for these nets, it is not through a variance but is through amending the need for a net next to a wetland within 275 feet. Mr. von Oven said if it had been a surprise to the owners, he would try to find a way to ease that burden. However, if this was not in Planning Commission Minutes – June 15, 2021 12 the business plan, then it wasn’t a very good business plan, or it was a hopeful business plan that the previous owner did not have nets for 10 years so they could perhaps not have nets. He has to be on the side of denying the variance. Commissioner Alto said as they spoke earlier in terms of setting precedence, doesn’t it set the precedent that one can buy a business that is out of compliance and hope that the City will allow them to continue to be out of compliance. Commissioner Skistad is all for supporting and protecting wetlands but she does not feel that this does either. It would have been better if it was addressed before it got to this point, but perhaps one cannot know that until they have had the business and been hitting golf balls for 60 days. She will vote against this motion for those reasons. The motion carried with a vote of 4 to 2. Ayes 4, Nays 2 (Noyes, Skistad) Mr. Generous stated this is a recommendation from the Planning Commission to the City Council on July 12, 2021. Mr. Young-Walters noted staff will do their best to reach out to the DNR and try to clarify their feelings on this condition. He said Staff did reach out to the DNR when the discussion on delaying the condition came up and were not able to get a response, but he promises they will try. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approve Planning Commission Minutes dated June 1, 2021. Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the Planning Commission Minutes from June 1, 2021. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Skistad moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:29 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: June 15, 2021 CC DATE: June 28, 2021 REVIEW DEADLINE: June 29, 2021 CASE #: PC 2021-08 BY: RG SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is request for a two-foot height variance for an accessory structure. LOCATION: 6300 Hummingbird Road APPLICANT: Armenak Petrosian 6300 Hummingbird Road Excelsior, MN 55331 PRESENT ZONING: Single-Family Residential (RSF) 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density ACREAGE: 0.82 acres DENSITY: NA LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting a two foot height variance to allow them to keep the accessory garage as constructed. The applicant has stated that the design of their addition and garage will allow for the future connection to a reconstructed single-family home. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the requested two-foot accessory structure height variance and adopts the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.” 6300 Hummingbird Road June 15, 2021 Page 2 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Section 1-2: Building height means the vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or ten feet above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or average height of the highest of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. (20) Chapter 20, Article II, Division 3. Variances Chapter 20, Article XII, “RSF” Single-Family Residential District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 1. Generally Section 20-904, Accessory Structures BACKGROUND The house was constructed in 1945. The property was replatted in 1978. Building permit #2019-01889 was issued on August 9, 2019 to demolish an existing shed and replace with 24’ x 32’, one-story accessory structure. SITE CONSTRAINTS Zoning Overview The Single-Family Residential zoning district permits a single-family home and up to 1,000 square feet in accessory structures. Building height for homes are limited to three stories and 35 feet. Accessory structures are limited to 20 feet in height. The maximum hardcover is 25 percent impervious surface. Bluff Creek Corridor This property is not encumbered by the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Bluff Protection There are no bluffs on the property. Floodplain Overlay This property is not within a floodplain. Shoreland Management The property is not located within a Shoreland Protection District. 6300 Hummingbird Road June 15, 2021 Page 3 Wetland Protection There are no wetlands on site. NEIGHBORHOOD Variances within 500 Feet: There is one variance within 500 feet of the property. 6200 Murray Hill Road #1977-08 15-foot front yard setback ANALYSIS Detached Garage In 2019, the applicant applied to construct a 768 (24 ft. x 36 ft.) square foot, one-story, approximately 15-foot tall, detached accessory structure to replace an existing shed. Foundation Elevation After beginning construction, the applicant modified his plan to construct a two-story accessory structure without submitting revised plans to the city for review. In March, 2021, the homeowner submitted revised plans for the garage he had built. His initial submittal showed the shed height at 22 feet; however, the corrected plans show it right at the 20- foot height limit. 6300 Hummingbird Road June 15, 2021 Page 4 Staff informed him that he needed to call the Building Department to set up a final inspection. In order to verify that the revised plans he submitted were accurate, we had the building inspector check the following: 1) Floor to ceiling height (especially lower level) 2) Verify that 4:12 pitch trusses were used. 3) Verify the shown two-foot grade differential. The building inspector went to the site on March 12, 2021, to perform an inspection. He determined the building height to be 24 feet 10 inches with the roof height constituting four feet, with an average height of two feet. The building height then becomes 22 feet, which is two feet taller than permitted by Code. At that point, staff advised the applicant that they would need to apply for a variance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, deny the requested two-foot accessory structure height variance, require the applicant to apply for a building permit, revise the plans and reconstruct the garage to meet the 20-foot building height, and adopt the attached Findings of Facts and Decision.” If the Planning Commission determines that the variance should be granted, staff recommends that the following motion and Conditions of Approval be adopted: 6300 Hummingbird Road June 15, 2021 Page 5 The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a two-foot accessory structure height variance, subject to the Conditions of Approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. 1. The applicant shall provide revised plans that accurately reflect the constructed building. 2. The applicant shall schedule and receive a final inspection. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Decision (Denial) 2. Findings of Fact and Decision (Approval) 3. Development Review Application 4. Applicant’s Narrative 5. Plan Sheets 6. Affidavit of Mailing g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-10 6300 hummingbird road var\staff report_6300 hummingbird rd_var.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COTINTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Armenak Petrosian for a two-foot height variance for an accessory structure on property at 6300 Hummingbird Road, zoned Single-Family Residential District, RSF - Planning Case #2021-10. on June l5,2}21,the chanhassen Planning commission, acting as the Board ofAppeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application Armenak Peirosian for a two-foot height variance for an accessory structure. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT l The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 5, Block l, Munay Hill Replat of 17 and 18 4. Variance Findines - Section 20-58 ofthe Ci ty Code provides the lollowing criteria for the granting ofa variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent ofthis Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b. Finding: The applicant is proposing to increase the permitted height of an accessory structure by two feet. While accessory structures are limited in height, they applicant has constructea the accessory structure to fit in',Mith a future reconstruction of the home on the property. By adding a second story, the applicant has created prepared this stnrcture for the future home. when there are practical diffrculties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties", as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this bhipt.r. Practical diffrculties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. g:\planUo2l planning casesu l -lo 6300 hummingbid road var\findings of frct and decision - apptoval'doc Finding: The property owner could constnrct an accessory structue that complies with ordinance, but it would not lend itself to a futue connection to a reconstructed home on the property and would require significant modification to be connected to a future two- story home. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance would allow the applicant to keep the constructed accessory building. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The reconstruction of the home is a timing issue for the applicant since the home is currently occupied by his father. Rather than having him move while a new home is constructed. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character ofthe locality. Finding: The variance will permit the applicant to keep the accessory structure, which is permitted on properties zoned RSF. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This condition does not apply' 5. The planning report #2021-10, dated June 15,2021, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The Board ofAppeals and Adjustments approves the two-foot accessory stmcture height variance subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant shall provide revised plans that accurately reflect the constructed accessory structure. b. The applicant shall schedule and receive a final inspection. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Board ofAppeals and Adjustments this 15e day ofJune, 2021. CITY OF CHAN SS BY: an 1\Ftt-vos o,tE) ,v,ag g$lr(lltlnl g:\plan\2021 planning casesu t -10 6300 humningbird road vaifindings of fact and decision - ryproval.doc 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (DENIAL) IN RE: Application of Armenak Petrosian for a two-foot height variance for an accessory structure on property at 6300 Hummingbird Road, zoned Single-Family Residential District, RSF – Planning Case #2021-10. On June 15, 2021, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application from Armenak Petrosian for a two-foot height variance for an accessory structure. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential District, RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density use. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 5, Block 1, Murray Hill Replat of 17 and 18. 4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The applicant is proposing to increase the permitted height of an accessory structure by two feet. Accessory structures are limited in height so that they maintain the appearance of the neighborhood. Generally but not always, accessory structures are one story in height. By adding a second story, the applicant has created a larger structure than is permitted. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties", as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 2 Finding: The property owner could construct an accessory structure that complies with ordinance. Their original building permit submittal complied with ordinance. It was when the plan were revised, and not reviewed by the city, that the applicant exceeded City Code. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance would allow the applicant to keep the constructed accessory structure, thus saving on demolition and reconstruction costs. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: By revising the accessory structure without submitting the plans for City review, the applicant constructed a building that exceeded City Code. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The variance will permit an accessory structure that is taller than most accessory structures. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This condition does not apply. 5. The planning report #2021-10, dated June 15, 2021, prepared by Robert Generous, et al, is incorporated herein. DECISION The Board of Appeals and Adjustments denies the two-foot accessory structure height variance and directs the applicant to apply for a new building permit and remodel the structure to comply with City ordinance. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments this 15th day of June, 2021. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: _______________________________ Steven Weick, Chairman g:\plan\2021 planning cases\21-10 6300 hummingbird road var\findings of fact and decision - denial.doc Qtsx- (.t tL.q oh Ja_ $200 COilIIIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1100 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CITY OI CHAI{HASSII{ u v APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW subinitbrDd!: ?/oo1Sl n*"k /,s l>t ccoa",a / t a-l >l 6GDay Reviev, Date:Ulot Section 1: Applicataon Type (check all that apply) E tnterlm Use Permit (lUP) E h coniunction with Single-Family Residence.. $325E att oners...... ............. ... ...$425 (Rolet to ha qf/ryiae AIPlic ion C,€,c,did tu tqdtd I Compehensive Plan Arnendment......................... $600! Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers.....$100 E Conditional Use Permit (CUP)E Single-Family Residence ................................ $325D att oners...... .......................$42s slffid inloot,,rjo, thal md s.,,np',-y hb aniL?/lrryr) E SuMivision (SUB)!fI trtr Create 3 lots or less .................--..................... $300 Create over 3 lots $600 + $15 per lot(__ lots) Metes & Bounds (2 lots)...,..............................$m Coosolidate Lots. ................. $150 $300 on Permit (WAP) $150 $275 $100 E Lot Line Adjusrnent.........................................$150E Finat P1a1...................... ........$7OO (lncludes $450 esoow for attomey costs)' 'AdditbrEl€scrqw rIlay b€ rlSrirEd b o0€r applications Arough 0ta devdoFnenl omtacl E Vacatlm of Easemenb/Rigtrt-of-way (VAC)........ (Addliond ,.cordng tu€s m.y ely) E Variance (VAR) E Wetland Alterati Single-Family Residence $7s0 $100 $s00 E sbn Plan Review........................-......................... $150 E Site Plan Review (SPR) E Adminisrrawe ......................$1mI Cornmerciautndusfial Disticts'...................... $5OO Plus $10 per 1,0(x) square feet of building area:( thoussnd square feet) 'lndude nmb.r of ldgbq employoas: E Escmw fq Recoding Documents (cfEck all that D ConOitionat Use PermitE vacatbnE Mdes & Bounds SuMMsion (3 docs.) 'lrdude nunb€r ol Agg €mdoF€5: Residential Disficts............................. Plus $5 per d,velling unit ( units) $500 El Nomcatim Sign (city b irdar and rEmorre) ! Property Orners' List within g)0' (city ro gsncraie affer pre-appticarion rn€eting) gE: lthen rflddph +plica0ons r]l pToc6sed conoJrrnly, the approp.ld! ftc shCl be.rrargcd lor ..ch appllc.Oon. $3 '6"*:T..l......, gso per dodmentE Site Plen AgreementE wetlandE oeeos TOTAL FEE Alteration Perrnit .@ $soo Section 2: Required lnformation Description of Proposal Property Address or Location:i0 0 Hua parcet#: )s.S.rClI&,Legal Description: Total Acreage:Wetlands Present? E Yes El No Serecr one fZS F Requested Zoning . Select One Requested Land Use Oesignation . Select One 6ie Hrlr:st Present Land Use Desig 661;66. Selecl One &isting Use of Property: Echeck box if separate nanative is attached. r E Rezoning (REz )E Phnned Unit Development (PUD) ..................E Uinor lmenOment to existing PUO............-....E ff ottrcrs...... lnterim UsqPermit Variance 7>o Easements ( easements) Pres€nt Zoning: Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant lnformation Name frntact: Phone:Address: City/Statetz ip Email: Cell: Fax: DateSignature: PROPERW OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as property o,vner, have tull legEl capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by lhose conditions, subjec{ only to the right to otject at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep mysetf informed of the deadlines for submissbn of material and the progress of this application. I turther understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studi6, etc. with an estimate prior to any autlrcrizetion to proceed with f}e I certify the information and exhibits submitted are true and Address:OO Huautri,,g Qc{ R4Mngsgl ei/a L- P.fr-ot;o cofrect. Contact Emait: cRRe o Signalure: PROTECT ENGIIiIEER (if applceb) Name: tq. e I (' enrr^ Cell: Fax: Oate Cell: Fax: ^t Address: Contact Phone: City/Statezip: Email: This applicalion must be compleEd in tull and musl be accompanied by all inbrmation and plans requircd by applicabl€ City Ordimnce provisbns. EoforB filing this applicatbn, rebr to the apFopriate Applicalbn Cfieddist and confer with the PhnnirE DeparfiEnt to determine the specific ordinance and apdicable procedural r€quirernents and fees. A determination of compleleness of the application shall be made within 15 business da)6 of application submittal. A written notice of applicetion deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business da)/s of application. tryho should receiye copaes of statr rcports? Owner Via: Ma: Ma: Ma: dEmair ! Eemait E E emait E Eemar E Mailed Paper Copy Mailed Paper Copy Mailed Paper Copy Mailed Paper Copy City/Statezip Email: Appli:ant Engineer other' Address: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Com plete all necessary form fields, then selecl sAvE FoRM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM end deliver to city along with required docurnents and payrnent. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. SAVE FORI PRII{T FORM SUBMIT FORM APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERW OWNER: ln signing this applicalion, l, as applicant, represenl to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subjecl only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. lf this application has not been signed by the property owner, I ha\e attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submissaon of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additionalfees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted ere true and conect. study. Name: pnone: 1{A- ) ?o - ?43 ? city/statezip: Section 4: Notification lnformation 'Other Contacl lnformation : Name: To whom it may concern, We hereby requesting approval of variance for newly build structure (Shed/Garage) that stands 2' above allowed accessory structure height of 20'. While our original permit request was submitted for much lower height, during the construction we came to realization that in the future we would like to make this accessory structure part of the new house, that will be built on this parcel. To accommodate for desired (typical these days) height of the 9' for the first floor and 8'for the second floor and taking in consideration the fact that future house will need to be elevated at the min of one feet from the ground, we ended up with 10' for first floor and 8' for the second story of the new structure. While our desire was to have much higher root pitch, to keep up with essential characters of the current locality and surroundings and harmonizing with current structure roof line with the existing structure, we went with 5/12 pitch to mitigate esthetic view of new addition during the time 2 structures will remain on the parcel. As you can see in pictures below, lowering the roofline made the new structure to fit esthetically into neighborhood and existing structure character without standing out due to the structure size. ,t- t !tr! tfi, - d While we met all the min requirements for the height of the building for our future construction needs, we unfortunately have a "practical difficult/' with complying with current zoning ordinance for the height of accessory building since it is a stand-alone structure currently. We will be in compliance with the zoning ordinance for the height when this structure will become part of the main structure. We would like to emphasize that this height difference does not change property value. We have lived 2Gr years in this community and have no previous, existin8 or future intensions to create any hardship for anyone with our plans on our land. We are just trying to build a better future for our family with the means and timeframes that we have today. We are asking for the approval of the variance until we build the new structure and become compliant with the zoning ordinance again when new garage/shed will become part of the new house. Sincerely, Armenak and Lena Petrosian Future CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( ss. CoUNTYoFCARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on June 3,2021, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy ofthe attached notice ofa Public Hearing to consider a request for a 2-foot height variance for an accessor? structure on property tocated at 6300 Hummingbird Road, zoned Single-Family Residential (RSF)' Planning Case No. 2021-10, to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses ofsuch owners were those appearing as such by the records ofthe County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. this3(tr day of S ubscribed and swom to before me Kim Meuwissen, Deputy k (Seal) JEAII Iil STECI(LIilG ilohryhffi'ilImGa!l,hEt-rrx,Ea 2021. N otary Public Subject Parcel Disclaime. This map is neither a legally rccorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilalron of records. information and dalia located in vadous cily, county, strate and federal offces and other sources regading the area shown, and is to be used for reference puryoses only. The City does not warant that the Geog6phic lnformation System (GlS) Data used to pepare lhis map are enor free and lhe City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navlgational, tracking or any other pu.poie requidng exacting measurement ol distance or diredion or preosion in the depiction of oeographic features. The preceding disclaims is provided pursuant to Minnesota Slalutes 5466.03, Subd 21 (2000). and the user of this map acknowiedges that the City shall not be liable tor any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and no6 harmless the city trom any and all claims brought bt User, its employees or agents. or third p€rtes which arise out of the use/s access or use of data provided. (TAX-NAi|EE rTAX_ADD_Llr rTAX_ADD_L2l (Next Record)N(TAX-NAMET <TAX_ADD_LI r r<TAX_ADD-L2r Subiect Parcel lI Diaclaimor This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a suryey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilatron of records, infomatjon and dala located in vaiou3 clty, county, state and federal off@s and other sources regarding the aree shown, aod is to be used lor reference purposes only. The City does not wanant that lhe Geographic lnformalion System (GlS) Dala used to prepare this map are enor free and the City do€s not represenl thal the GIS Oata can be used for navigatronal, tracking or any other purmse requiring exactng measurcment of disliance or directron or precjsion in the clepictjon of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is provided purcuant to Minnesota statutes s466 03. Subd. 21 (2000). and the user of this map acknowledges thal the City shall not be laable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims' and agrees lo defend, indemnfy, and hold hatmless the City from any aM all claims brought by user. its employees or agents, or tiird pa.lres whict afse out of the useis access or use of chta povided ! I fr T E D a -- rrf* tp\-! -)\. I U f] l/' t- !- ! t- - ?a!!:po-oo lt)o5(Do, &PoaNO. -cno-Ecc ;c(E:o- 9E P(!d)IocoooooN|\-tio-o Eoa,(-) caoo o- --_o o)cooEc.9.9EEooq)ccC'Eooo, ?oo,oco =o o =E coc.so-ooEcqq!stiaEc c) occi!! lLotEcq)p(l,d.o+o)ot.-coEocoN ci f f to o (0 cC'ooc(E.c.9oEN(! o oaoo o q)p coo 0.!!o3e6E&: "tq E.=o "or.gCo oo (o< oq)'6' o d)EEE E5 6= Io-o > a ;l-o-c c A ::o qro .ga =3PE gE ;isE en 8..5E Egg "FiEEgEEEE€E;EETg!EE;;E;EE35Ef EE6-PE;HP :s$Ege-f;E +€sEGeEio.9E;l(,Foo-o o-o -.-c cL -cr yF(!(!!F(!o$ Eq, q, E o'6 .9 E Eoo .dE=E$.,(D > o Y:}E*EEE"' 6 -o d.I oroloE E'.-e eEEfi;E=! F a, o.Ir EE >E 88 3B€ k oro 93n EtB"' c (! G5E=a i e -.eggr:Iep=PQ >o I o>o(D -ll=o;Eq,o =o > !gEEE -'!;E j N H 3,Ei ot(oo)oocoEo-oo=iqCq,(E.ccoEI e JIq)coo -o (! o Eo :e'.6 9, 2> -5g EEE e.Eo -cva 33E >aoEti.eE o= Ed)c, oc OOI o$ gElfigs{lae 5 9la te" EIB ;E EIEopElE P a€Ifpa ql 6 saElE o.fc ,9 o d) E .Foc f c Ec o., ClEcoEq q E oo()o)=llo=1!-oil)Eo D c)too o-a 0.) t! o o,p oco o) a .Etr !; o ooo- opcn)(,)q)c0)q)Eco)E;c.oo(.)Eog x 0) op ([ o Elo lt, oo o) o o,f tr .9)o =u,lz E a E 6 E .g 6 I o .EF€(, t!o o GooJ , o (! o, .9 '6 .ots3l!co- ::(!oo CLIo. iio =o E 0, o G >EtooEo. t!eto-J q ii) o.= =6'f= eOr!E =i .6..o9CEoo o=OE=ogo otoEDO.s=6=oo-ElloEo3>O-= E()oEoooo,EOoozt= t! o o .E EDO =E(!-g'6 rJ3 =o€odi E6oE6q, E,BzEca! .Eo cD 'i: q, c) E o'6 .9 E Eoo c(l, o lt,o- (l, Eo E a; -9 o -9,4, o P o e.o Hg8: 6?.=6 ErgCa er oEoo (o< _ (,)PEE '-.c o)EEE q -o-c c 7i o(! Ett (d X A =6E *- E9.:; tE 6EESgE* 5€Ee9H[:dE!-;eg:ai 3E€Ee ieE EEEEEEEE EE5E Eg Ef EE"FIE * e E; It;cE5 = fr:€Ee 5€*= f o, (, r- (J O-o o-o -.-c o--o :F O (!tFNclt o o E Q) € e d E .: ! E .a F cio9F. o Noat d o)cl");oo o,lF E o o o co o o =ooF.F. !; o.o EoEo ocfo (_) o- o a .lou,l- q,ic.=l -o ql3:,ll o ^6 ,EI E sl5 EIEI EI Eil ts 3ld -lCql o 5t3_3laolEEl (Egtd Ele .9t E !la !rE AA>-- LLaE oF 6E d, d. : E C' LL o o,c cho 0)EoN o, l f -o oo (0 co o o co Eo)'d E oo N o o q) loo (l, q,p coo a c ,s, o o E C Jcq c iD o-cc GEI 3;; !coo)oo)oc-EO EoEg 5E Eg 2lnEa6ooo) 9o EE;E croE'6ocaoE OJE.>t9lo EE eE rcEEdtL 2e. =;!E E 9 E otr =o E C'CII o- >Et.o o-oPto-J 9b a, .=CL; r'g l!.CEP =E idc F c6(, (!o o t!IJoJ T .9 t! CI.9'6-ot=oGO- t!oo ELor c .g o (! (!c ID E e :?* g=EEe E EEPAE;EEE :ags6s;f Ee:EEEEEti E etIcElE HgE t gBgEBiEEiE .a ..o9E.O(, tD=O'E:ooo ooooooots,G.EEEdooOOOOOOOdGEtG,A.G.Et))666AA66JJ(9(,(99(919(,r-zzzzzzz>->-=======gg>>>=>>>EEllll)))!!r-r---->> !-.{ Lt) Cr ii r-t O Ft O FlFr\ao@otooNNNa{NNc!.nrnd)(Y)(o(o(o(o(oro\o(o(o FF O ql .Eol (nor<f O<f m .r) Oc)+sllr)<tt<l<f SNqll{) 6 O !QO 6or@rnO @ 0O .o-O.O6€O.yl .O .ir ivioo o i 99n QQo9ooa @ o @o€.oo€aat6ddor or o oo a@ 6€6.o00 0 co @@@6600at4@-06,iiir,iaFl .-l !-r r-l !.{ Fi F.l F.{ F.l F.l F{ Fl !.1 F.l !.{ F.l -i -t r-{ r-.1 F.t .i !-t F{ r..t r-l !i ..t i Fr ..r !i rid)rn (n m (nlr1 m (n r') an mm (Y) m mm ln d) an (t (n ln (n .y, m lY) d) (n ar, (n an d) mm m an m dt d) m d) d) (n m (n d) m (n m rn m an m (n an (n rn m d) tr) (, rn lYt an (n mU) la Ln rn LA U) LA Ln .,1 U) tJ)|a rn !1 LO l..) Ul g) LA !n !n g) ul !n ul La Ur .n !n .A l.n rai tailJ) !n ln.n l,1 ra rn Ln rn Ln t, rn l,1 u1 Ln ul u1 t4 ln Ln !n l./] v) t/) !n l'a rrl u) l,) ta rn !n ulz z z z z z z. z z z z z z z. z z. z z z z z z z z 2 z z z z z 2 z zN==>>==>>>===>>====>>==>=>:>>===>= t d d 6a oa d oa oi oa oe oe !a oe d oi !a oe oe oi d oa oe oa o(' d oa oe oa oe 6e oa oe oi 6a ^o o ooo oo o oo o o 666 O 6 66 66 o o o oo oo o o666 o2 4 4 4 4 4 4 q v,,4,4 6 -6 -n -^ i^ 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6,^ A v, 6 A G A,r, ; I I.U !U U I'! rlJ LU TTJ lrJ IJJ lrJ I.IJ T! UJ IJ.I TJJ UJ lrJ IJJ IJJ IJJ IJ.I I.!J UJ TTJ TJJ IU IJ.I L! tJJ IJJ I! UJ !Ux u u u u u u u (J (J !.2 !, !,2 !J !2 !.1 !, u u u u o o o o o o o o o o o o o<xxxxxxxxxxx=xx****=**=====xx=*i**F lrl l! uJ ur t! trJ IrJ trr ur lr.r Er Lu LrJ ur rri rr.r uJ L! r! r! iri iLi iri Li iri Li [ri [ri r.u u.t qJ uJ o o o o o 00oo600 E e e p e p e e p 5 e 5 e E p X e E p p p 5 X X 5 5 E 5 e e - c- --t ( --t 4 t 4 - i t t L 4 4 q. G G G G -r Jat!!:JJJJ=J .o = .o J 6 = A J A J I J A E A 6 6 6 6 f =OOrrI r--I- -'-9-9-9r9-(J, rI-99(9(,(9l9(9rI n t y a e e E e E a a 6 Z=i=i=i=3 = 3 3 3=======3i; == 33 3P 3 3 3: : =4"s=g = g = B = 3 E E = = = i E = = g s --l I O O O Fr -{ -i O O rr aO v) O !-.r F{ O Fr Fi O O O Fr O Ct !-r 6 Cr Ft !-t o r-r o Ft)< cl -l st rYt r,1 (O f- @ Cn Or CD Ot O O.! m.n .n <l !n (O (O f\ F. F. F. O @ Ol O O - a{< Or Or (n O O O O O O O () m N - ..r N .! N 6r N N N N c.r i.r irr c.r - ii - - .n d,F Fr Fr Fr N 6l N 6t ..,t ..{ N N m \o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (o (c, ({) (o 6 6 tj i.ct tc| \!, 6 (ct iZtr<\H =r{ + .>.o i L/)LUt-==EJ > d =8 ; a,- ! =: n oY =32 = E= 9E - ur o =;ria;==E;I;Eie=iiE;=IxElgEEgEglE= oooooEppe e e a e e e E P E e E p X e 5 e e--!-{---tg_-4tiL.Lc, e J J = = = = = = = =.o J.o = A J 6 J A J Joo-rrErr-r--9r9-(9r(,r(9--ssaaBa-eeBeE=e=i=i=a=tt^ = = 3 3 3 3 -e 3 33 3 3 = g = g = g = 1iE:5 Soooo FlFl .rooFr@ti c) Fi F.r (:) Fr r-r o o o .r oI Cl -i $ q)'4 I i- !0 ql Or Or @ O O N m m.n t l,) (O (o r\ = (h q1 0r o o o o o o o o o.! N .! N 6t N .! N ..,t .! N(a Fr F{ r-.r N a{ l! 11 NNNa!N(O(O(O(O(O@(O(o\o(o(o E6r)r=oEea==aQITCII"{LEm-FH2qp€'.iiBEEHai ET;TI ->(@ Q;I DC; -a vt- "'lz0 or ot or or ol olSSqruJq)uJ@P{555oooPoo<o<<<=C:CCC=,+vuv<,=vDr?>z>>>=-<@<<<Z -t---6) =>F-Fqt-Y-'t-t-V, vv700 00o!I lnrYlrnmmFlxxxxxx..)0r).)()0lnmmmrt!lrl-, Gtr,E,7,F,666666PPPPPP zzz.zzz(,nurur(,vl(,gr(,r(Jr(J1qrl,lJ, u, uJ qJ uJ (.r,(! uJ (rJ (r.) (.D (! PPPPPP @6@@(oo@6 5@5N cD (n ct! cn crr or5E(r)@iJJ(,rallr\r555oooPoo<o<<<-CZCCC=v'nrvU<v=vvu?I'z>>>=<cD'<<<2,at---o 1-v,-t--,ov vruoo s00,0