The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2020 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Note: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Identify City Manager Finalists B.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated December 7, 2020 2.Ordinance XXX: Approve the Rezoning of 1601 Lake Lucy Road (Island) and Approval of Summary Ordinance for Publication 3.Approve Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications for The Park 3rd Addition 4.Consider a Request for an Amendment to Chanhassen Gateway PUD, Modification to PUDSpecific Design Features, and Amendment to Crossroads of Chanhassen Site Plan with Variances for Construction of a 5,100 SF Automotive Repair Shop Located at 8941 Crossroads Boulevard; and Approval of Summary Ordinance 5.Resolution 2020XX: Designate Polling Place Locations for 2021 Elections 6.Approval of Cartegraph Software Renewal 7.CARES Act Final Budget E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:00 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Identify City Manager FinalistsB.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated December 7, 20202.Ordinance XXX: Approve the Rezoning of 1601 Lake Lucy Road (Island) andApproval of Summary Ordinance for Publication3.Approve Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications for The Park3rd Addition4.Consider a Request for an Amendment to Chanhassen Gateway PUD, Modification toPUDSpecific Design Features, and Amendment to Crossroads of Chanhassen SitePlan with Variances for Construction of a 5,100 SF Automotive Repair Shop Locatedat 8941 Crossroads Boulevard; and Approval of Summary Ordinance5.Resolution 2020XX: Designate Polling Place Locations for 2021 Elections6.Approval of Cartegraph Software Renewal7.CARES Act Final BudgetE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) F.OLD BUSINESS 1.Avienda Wetland Credit Purchase NOD Extension G.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.Approval of OnSale Brewer Tap Room and Small Brewer OffSale Liquor Licenses Chanhassen Brewery Company located at 951 West 78th Street 2.Annual Public Hearing for Chanhassen MS4 and SWPPP H.NEW BUSINESS 1.Ordinance XXX: Approve a Code Amendment Regulating the Outdoor Storage of Boats, Trailers, and Recreational Vehicles on Residential Properties 2.Resolution 2020XX: Adopt Final Levy & 2021 Budget and 20212025 CIP 3.Ordinance XXX: Amendment to City Code Chapter 4, Fees I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Review of Claims Paid 12142020 2.Monthly Fire Department Update 3.2020 Building Permit Activity November Year To Date L.ADJOURNMENT M.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:00 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Identify City Manager FinalistsB.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated December 7, 20202.Ordinance XXX: Approve the Rezoning of 1601 Lake Lucy Road (Island) andApproval of Summary Ordinance for Publication3.Approve Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications for The Park3rd Addition4.Consider a Request for an Amendment to Chanhassen Gateway PUD, Modification toPUDSpecific Design Features, and Amendment to Crossroads of Chanhassen SitePlan with Variances for Construction of a 5,100 SF Automotive Repair Shop Locatedat 8941 Crossroads Boulevard; and Approval of Summary Ordinance5.Resolution 2020XX: Designate Polling Place Locations for 2021 Elections6.Approval of Cartegraph Software Renewal7.CARES Act Final BudgetE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)F.OLD BUSINESS1.Avienda Wetland Credit Purchase NOD ExtensionG.PUBLIC HEARINGS1.Approval of OnSale Brewer Tap Room and Small Brewer OffSale Liquor Licenses Chanhassen Brewery Company located at 951 West 78th Street2.Annual Public Hearing for Chanhassen MS4 and SWPPPH.NEW BUSINESS1.Ordinance XXX: Approve a Code Amendment Regulating the Outdoor Storage ofBoats, Trailers, and Recreational Vehicles on Residential Properties2.Resolution 2020XX: Adopt Final Levy & 2021 Budget and 20212025 CIP3.Ordinance XXX: Amendment to City Code Chapter 4, FeesI.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSJ.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONSK.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION1.Review of Claims Paid 121420202.Monthly Fire Department Update3.2020 Building Permit Activity November Year To DateL.ADJOURNMENTM.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONSWelcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen CityCouncil wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is providedat every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required tocomplete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available athttps://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior tothe meeting.Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. Whencalled upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the CityCouncil as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the CityCouncil.If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokespersonthat can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If youhave written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Identify City Manager Finalists Section 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Jake Foster, Assistant City Manager File No: SUMMARY The City Council met on November 12, 2020, and identified 12 candidates as semifinalists for the City Manager position. At this meeting, the Council will review additional information provided by the candidates and select which candidates will be interviewed onsite in January. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated December 7, 2020 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the verbatim minutes from the December 7, 2020 City Council/Truth in Taxation Meeting.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL/TRUTH IN TAXATION MEETING DECEMBER 7, 2020 Mayor Ryan called the City Council/Truth in Taxation meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, and Councilman Campion, Councilwoman Coleman COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Heather Johnston, Kelly Strey, Kate Aanenson PUBLIC PRESENT: George Beniek 412 West 76th Street Bala Chintaginjala 8982 Southwest Village Loop Mike Wollin Carver County Sheriff’s Office (via Zoom) Mayor Ryan: Good evening again, everyone. Thank you again for joining us tonight. Due to the high COVID numbers we have decided to again conduct our City Council meeting via Zoom. While I am here in the Council chambers along with a few members of city staff, our four Council members are joining us via Zoom and since we are operating in this fashion I will be taking roll call votes throughout the meeting. For the record, we have all of our members present tonight. Our first action is our agenda approval. Council members, are there any modifications to the agenda as printed? Please respond with yay or nay. Councilman McDonald? McDonald: Nay Tjornhom: Nay Coleman: Nay Campion: Nay Ryan: Nay. So we will proceed with the published agenda. Tonight we have no Public Announcements. Next is our Consent Agenda. Tonight we have Consent Agenda item numbers 1 through 8. All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be recorded as a single motion based on staff recommendation. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Are there any items that the Council would like to consider separately? Councilman McDonald? Councilman McDonald: No. City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 2 Councilwoman Tjornhom: No. Councilwoman Coleman: No. Councilman Campion: No. Mayor Ryan: I would like to remove one item and that’s Consent Agenda Item No. 4 and that’s the 2021 Police Contract with Carver County Sheriff’s Office. After we approve that I would move that to H-1 under New Business. Is there a motion to approve Consent Agenda Items Nos. 1 through 3 and 5 through 8? CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Coleman seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the Interim City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated November 23, 2020. 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated November 17, 2020. 3. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated October 27, 2020. 4. Approve 20201 Police Contract with Carver County Sheriff’s Office – Item moved to New Business H-1. 5. Approval of Telecommuting Policy. 6. Ordinance 662: Approve Code Omnibus Amendment Addressing the 1) Definition of Street; 2) Administrative Duties; 3) Administrative Septic Variances; 4) Earthwork Fee. 7. Resolution No. 2020-65: Carver County Covid Support. 8. Approve Engagement Agreement with Moss & Barnett. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS - NONE PUBLIC HEARING: PUBLIC MEETING ON THE PROPOSED 2021 BUDGET. Kelly Strey: Thank you Madam Mayor and Council members. Tonight we will have our budget presentation. I’m going to share my screen here. Tonight you’re getting down to the last two meetings of your budget year. As you can see, all of the meetings that you’ve had previous to City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 3 this where you discussed a lot of detail in every aspect of the budget previous to this. So tonight is just a summary of where we’re at on the levy and follow up as we’ve had and an opportunity for public comment. Mayor Ryan: Could you speak just a little bit louder please? It’s a little bit hard to hear. Kelly Strey Would you like me to do that one over again or? Mayor Ryan: No. We see the budget calendar so that’s good. As if you move forward if you wouldn’t mind speaking a little bit louder that would be helpful please. Kelly Strey: I’ll move a little bit closer to my screen. Is that better? This slide’s just a little information about the truth in taxation meeting and how the process works. As you remember, you set a maximum levy back in September and you set that levy at 2.77% and then the County has sent no truth-in-taxation notices of the proposed tax statements to each individual property tax owner so that they can see what the maximum amount of tax will be on their property. So everybody should have gotten one of those recently, by the end of November I believe and then we are required to hold a public hearing where public where the opportunity for public testimony is available. Then you’ll have your vote on final levy adoption next week on December 14th. As an overview of where your expenditures are, this is the General Fund so this is where most of the General Fund activity is, not capital and enterprises funds but General Fund. The total proposed recommended budget for 2021 is $12,086,200 for a 1.6% increase. On the revenue side, property taxes are just one revenue. It is the majority of the revenue in the General Fund. You can see how each of those different categories has changed. This represents a balanced budget with $12,086,200. You will notice that your charges for services this year are down significantly and that is due to the economic factors that are going on right now. What factors changed in the 2020 budget – the high level ones? You have a levy increase of 2.5% proposed which is a little bit below the maximum tax that we set. No increase in health care costs for employees and that is an unusual year so that’s a good thing that factored into the budget this year. There’s a 2% cost of living and step pay increases for merit. There is adjustments to the police contract and police state aid, a new technology fee for permit software, and a Planning Intern that’s funded out of sign permit fees. We have revenue estimates updates that had some shortfalls from last year and we have a new partnership for congregate dining, and streets and parks snowplowing policy savings are factored in a savings of $19,000. The next two slides show you a breakdown by fund with the General Fund and the capital and the debt levy for changes… Are you able to see that final column? Mayor Ryan: Yes. Kelly Strey: So that shows you where the levy is so a total levy of $12,066,700 at max tax was 2.77. This slide shows you how it changed which is just in the General Fund for $12,034,800. This is just a reminder, just a point of reference on how much the levy has to change in order to have a 0.1% change in the levy. Every 0.1% change is $12,000 up or down, and to have a 1% change in the levy that’s $120,000. I like to show this slide just as a point of reference. If you City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 4 are wanting to make an impact on the levy, this is how much that would equate to. This slide is from our last meeting, our most recent meeting that shows the effect on three different values of homes if their valuation did not change during the year at what it was in 2020, also with the referendum levy which is the debt levy that’s going away, and then what it would be for 2021 based on the preliminary levy at 2.77% and 2.5% increase in the next column. The difference between the 2.7% increase and the 2.5% increase that’s reduced from the max tax ranges from about three to five dollars a year on those different values of homes. As you can see it’s not a lot on an individual home and that is a levy decrease of about $32,000. When property owners look at their property taxes, residential, you will see that there are multiple governing bodies that have a piece of the property tax on that property tax statement. I want to point out the city represents about 19% of property tax on the residential property. The school district and county have the other portions and some other smaller districts represent that over 5%. So how do we compare to other cities that are similar in size? These cities are ones that Chanhassen has selected as their comparable cities over time. As you can see, Chanhassen is on the low end of percent change in the levy this year. This is kind of a simplistic comparison because each city is different and they have different factors each year but it is just at a high level looking at it. Chanhassen is one of the lowest of the proposed max tax. This slide shows you compared to Carver County cities, also on the low end in comparison to our neighbors. That leads me to discussion points for Council consideration. As you consider the final tax levy and CIP and fees on December 14th, you can direct staff to prepare the levy at 2.5% as previously discussed with the reduction. The most that you could levy is that max tax at 2.77%. There was some discussion about whether an IT position could be moved ahead from proposed for 2022. You could take part of that $32,000 and fund a portion of that. Or you could add resources to the Equipment Fund. Those are a couple of options that you could if you wanted to. We have recommended one-time use in the budget for the compensation study and unplanned COVID-related expenses so as we go forward if we have continued COVID paid sick leave we would recommend using fund balance to fund those expenses. That completes my portion of the presentation. I will open it up for questions. Mayor Ryan: Wonderful. Thank you. Before I open it up for the public hearing Council, are there any questions at this time, and just remember once I close the public hearing then we can come back to Council for further questions and discussion. If there is any questions at this time that you have for staff as it relates to the presentation, please let me know. Councilman McDonald? Any questions? Jerry McDonald: I will wait until after the public hearing to see what issues come up. Thank you. Bethany Tjornhom: Not at this time. Councilwoman Coleman: Not right now, thank you. Councilman Campion: I will hold my comments as well. City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 5 Mayor Ryan: Thank you and I don’t have any questions either. I hereby open the public hearing. Please step forward and state your name and address for the record. We also have the number on the screen if you want to call in. Before I welcome anybody to the podium, the public comments we did receive an email as it relates to the levy so I would like to read that into the record. The comment came from a Rob Hagerstrom and comment was “With the pandemic many folks are not getting raises or have even had to take pay cuts but city still wants more money. Does not make much sense.” I want to read that into the record. So that was from Rob Hagerstrom and I don’t have an address for that. That is one comment and if there’s folks from the audience that would like to step forward, please come forward and just state your name and address for the record please sir. George Beniek: My name is George Beniek and I live at 412 West 76th street. My question is did the city receive any stimulus funds and how were they spent? Mayor Ryan: Great question. We did receive just over $2 million dollars in CARES funding and the majority of the CARES funding went to facility improvements so we retrofitted some of our HVAC systems at City Hall and at our Public Works building, the Rec Center as well as the Library to make sure that there is a cleaner transfer of air. We upgraded some of our facilities within our public bathrooms, IT… Do we have the list, Heather that we could put on the screen? Heather Johnston: I can pull it up. Mayor Ryan: There was some IT improvements, technology improvements. The Council allocated just under $200,000 of funds to help small businesses in the form of grants. So we spent, I think it ended up being just about $2.1 million that we received in Federal money in the CARES Act. If we can pull this up to share with you. Heather Johnston: I’m still working on pulling it up but I also could take your email address and just send you the list as well but I will work to get it up here quick. Mayor Ryan: Okay. While she’s working on that, if there is somebody else that would like to come forward with a question or comment? Or a phone call. Bala, welcome. Bala Chintaginjala: Good evening, everybody. My name is Bala Chintaginjala. I live at 8982 Southwest Village Loop. During this stimulus fund, how much will you spend on IT improvements and may I know the details, if possible? Out of the money that was issued from the stimulus, how much was spent for IT. Heather Johnston: For the stimulus? Oh, how many IT improvements? Okay. I’m going to keep working on this because it will be on the screen. Bala Chintaginjala: I guess you could send an email answer. One more thing is, how much we support our small businesses during this time… City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 6 Heather Johnston: And that one I can mention off the top of my head is that we actually partnered with the Carver County Community Development Agency (CCDA) to give small business grants. We provided as many funds as there were applicants so if people applied they were able to receive those grants. I think that my understanding is actually the Council just passed a resolution tonight on the Consent Agenda saying that, recommending to Carver County that any additional stimulus funds that the might have because they have a little longer to spend it, should be used to provide support to local businesses. The total dollar amount? I’ll have to get back to you as soon as I pull it up but we did in fact try to maximize the amount of money and, in addition, there were some grants that were made to help with the liquor licenses, too. Help offset the cost of those liquor licenses as well. So those were the two primary areas that we did that and the Council, as I mentioned, just passed another resolution saying we need continued support for our small businesses. But I’m going to find that number for you as well. Bala Chintaginjala: Can I ask one more question on this support. Do we have a plan to use the loans free of interest for these small business owners during this time… ? Heather Johnston: Madam Mayor, sir. I am not sure that, the program that we partner with the CCDA and I think Ms. Aanenson is also on the line so she can certainly jump in and help me here if I go too far. That program was a grant program. It was not actually a loan program. I’m not aware of any particular additional programs for loans other than at the state. I know the state has some small business loans. The programs that we were participating in were all grant programs. Bala Chintaginjala: Thank you. Heather Johnston: You’re welcome. Mayor Ryan: Ms. Aanenson, are you on the phone? Kate Aanenson: Yes, I’m here. Mayor Ryan: Do you know off the top of your head and I apologize for putting you on the spot, but do you know how many Chanhassen businesses ended up receiving, I know everyone that applied from Chanhassen did receive the money, the grant. Do you know off the top of your head how many in Chanhassen were recipients? Kate Aanenson: Yes, actually I’m looking at, Kelly put together at your last meeting, the Interim Finance Director put together at your last meeting the allocations. So we actually had it broken down by different types and I could just go through that really quickly. I know Ms. Johnston was looking for that. So that was on the presentation made on your November meeting. It was a combination of about $327,000, almost $328,000. It went to hospitality, education, child care, City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 7 salons, some sports and fitness, some retail and health and wellness. So that was the… I can give you the numbers but I’m hoping that answers your question. Mayor Ryan: Bala, does that answer your question in terms of… Bala Chintaginjala: Yes, it does. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: And we can follow up more specifically, I know we have your email and Mr. Beniek if we could get your email as well we can give you the specific breakdown. We do have a chart that has a breakdown of how the funds were allocated. We had a short window of time to be able to spend it. It had to be spent initially by November 15th. So we made every effort to spend every dollar that was allocated to Chanhassen. So please, before you leave if you don’t mind leaving your email address so we can follow up? That would be great. You know, in addition, small businesses, addressing the needs of small businesses was absolutely a priority for Council as well as city staff and we acted immediately so it was initially with the liquor licenses, then as we were approaching some of the summer months, staff came up with a plan to figure out how businesses that had limited outdoor seating or no outdoor seating, we worked with them to move into the sidewalks and into the parking lots and our city staff came up with very ways to be able to address those needs when they weren’t allowed to have patrons inside or limited numbers. So we worked in close concert with our, particularly our restaurants, in order to support their needs as well. So it was a priority for this Council and city staff. Kate Aanenson: So mayor, I would just add to that, too. Not only did the City put in money be we were also able to leverage some of the County’s money, too. So that’s while we put in $200,000, actually over $350,000 was actually allocated to Chanhassen. Mayo r Ryan: Perfect. Thank you Ms. Aanenson. As Ms. Johnston pointed out just tonight our, when we approved that Consent Agenda at the very beginning of the meeting, the County had asked to cities to provide a preference if they have addition funds, how we would like to see those dollars allocated. The motion that we passed unanimously was to have it support small business because there continues to be a need as we know. And this looks like a very small printed screen so I don’t believe that anyone’s going to be able to read it very easily. Heather Johnston: And this is really the list, Madam Mayor. I’m sorry. This is the list of all the folks who received the grants but in terms of the list that was requested by the previous gentleman, we’ll have to just email that out and we can also post it on our website with this agenda as well. Mayor Ryan: Okay. That sounds great. Thank you for your questions. Is there a phone call? Anybody else who would like to come forward. Sir? No? We’ll just wait to see anyone wants to call in. You know, and as mentioned in terms of small business, early on when things were rapidly changing, our city staff reached out, had kind of a calling tree where they were reaching out to local businesses to find out what their needs were. If the City could help in any way so we City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 8 did outreach not only to small businesses but then also with different faith organizations to what they were doing to reach out to people in need. It was a really remarkable team effort in order to reach businesses and individuals in our community to make sure that we were providing any help that we could or, at least if at the time we hadn’t received any CARES funds, but if we could be a resource to put them in touch with folks through DEED and understanding that everybody was coming presenting different challenges and struggles and we wanted make sure that we would be a resource for them as well. We acted very quickly and then as soon as got the funds, the way that we identified what the needs were in terms of how we were going to spend those allocated dollars. We did a feasibility study for all of our different facilities in Chanhassen to see what would be the best way to spend those CARES funds so we actually did a study that then directed us how best to use these dollars and that’s how we came up with that list, this list that’s on the screen now. This is the allocation of the dollars and it’s a little bit hard to read, I know. Heather Johnston: Madam Mayor, if you would like I can go through it real briefly. Would you like me to do that? Mayor Ryan: Yeah, please. That would be great. Thank you. Heather Johnston: So this is a list that the Council approved back in September and so the final numbers will be a little bit different than this. This was kind of the approved budget. The first piece is talking about EPSO, what is that? Well, that’s emergency paid sick leave and unemployment wages and so that was an estimate of when workers, in order to receive these funds the Federal Government mandated that we pay for up to 80 hours of sick leave for all employees. So that was our estimate of that. We did have additional costs related to public safety so our Fire Department duty crews, their wages are included on this as well as additional turnout gear. There were recommendations that were made that if you go into a COVID environment that you made need to change out your turnout gear. At this point in time very few of our fire folks had two sets of turnout gear so they would have to wash it and then wait for it to dry. That was what that was for. There were some wages that were paid for folks who were, while we were kind of transitioning to this virtual environment, and then there’s a grouping, so I won’t go into super detail on some of these improvements other than to say that as we learn more about the COVID-19 virus and we learned that and a lot of that was through the air, the Council made the decision to really try and make some improvements to the HVAC systems. We had also made improvements, as I think the Mayor had mentioned, to have touchless. You probably noticed there’s little hooks on the doors now and touchless fountains and things like that. In an older building you don’t necessarily have as many of those types of things. The forced closure on-sale restaurants grant award, you can see that was related to some of the liquor licenses. There’s election safety improvements. You probably noticed when you voted this year that there were a lot more guards and gloves and everything like that. There was a lot of PPE. We have masks for City employees and public visitors and then as a part of our facility review, before making large investments in the facilities themselves, we did have a study done, that’s that $14,000 there. I’m almost to the end, Madam Mayor. That really helped us kind of prioritize and make recommendations to the Council about what really would be best for the public and for the City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 9 employees in terms of keeping them safe in those facilities. Then that really kind of brings it the end where we have the Emergency Small Business Grant Award Program and that’s the budgeted amount of $250,000 as I indicated. I think we got a little bit of that back from the CCDA only because we didn’t have enough applicants so we funded everybody who was eligible who applied. That is the estimated budget, if that is helpful. If anyone has questions I’m happy to answer them. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Do you have any questions about the information? No? Okay. No phone calls coming in? Okay. With no further comments or questions. Thank you for those questions. We appreciate it. I’m going to close the public hearing and bring it back to Council for questions or comments this evening. Nobody called in? No? I’ll go down the line again and ask for any questions or comments. This is now coming back to Council for discussion. Obviously, tonight is public hearing, and then at our next meeting is when we will set the final tax levy for 2021, but I will begin with Councilman McDonald if you have any questions or comments. Jerry McDonald: Thank you, Madam Mayor. I have one question on the levy at 2.77%, one of the things that we were looking at would be an IT position. In light of everything that’s happened with COVID and the fact that we’re doing a lot more Zoom meetings and those types of things, I’d like to get an idea of what the priority should be for this particular position. I would like for city staff, if you can, to tell me the importance of this position by mid-year, or waiting until the following year in the budget at that point. Where are we at with, again I know we’ve put quite a strain on our IT systems. Do you see that lessening or is that what this decision helps with? Heather Johnston: Madam Mayor, I’m going to start and then I’m going to ask Rick Rice, our department director, to come up as well. I’m glad that you asked this question because the gentleman had asked specifically about IT and I just cruised right by that. Our technology improvements that we did as far as CARES was $112,000. I don’t know if you saw that on the list. You asked me that specific question and I read too quickly, so I apologize. Councilmember McDonald, I would start by saying that the needs are only getting greater. One of the big technology changes that we are doing currently is moving to a system that has online permitting. I think people’s expectation for their information technology needs only continue to increase. They want to do more things online. We are able to kind of do those as we can, but one thing I would say that is a challenge is that we really don’t have much by way of backup in our IT function. We have two people doing the work of probably four people and its’ been a little bit of a strain from a couple of different things. I’ll have the three that I pick and then I’m going to ask Rick to address it. One, I think that moving forward and the innovation you all expect from us, it’s difficult to do when you are doing kind of break fix and you’re really just trying to make sure everything’s working and so you don’t have the time to do those reflections and look for what might be the best approach or what kind of system might make us more efficient or allows for better public input. That kind of proactive is very difficult to do with a staff of two. The second thing, and I think I mentioned this, is really the backup. Just by having two people is very difficult to do to have something go wrong and if somebody’s out of town. We don’t often let Rick take vacation but if we do it’s very difficult for Matt. But it comes down to that. The third City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 10 piece really is training. You want to develop your people. You want them to be engaged in their job and from my standpoint as the person who encourages that, they don’t have any time to do training and so the only training they are able to do is “Oh, darn! That broke. Now I’ve got to quick go online and see if I can learn how to fix it.” That’s not the kind of training you want your folks to be able to do. You want them to do a lot more proactive. So that’s a very long answer to a short question which was the needs are only increasing. I don’t think that changes with COVID. They did a tremendous job, as you know, turning us all virtually very quickly. Now I’m going to stop talking and let Mr. Rice answer that question as well. Rick Rice: Thank you. Again, I’m Rick Rice. I’m the IT Manager here. The first issue that we run into is that there isn’t enough time for each of us to back each other up. I have my unique skills in the network side, Matt has unique skills in the user side, and right now there’s not enough time for us to actually understand what each of us is doing to be able to do that when the other person is gone. That’s a big chore. So when we take vacations it’s generally with your laptop so if there is a question that comes up you can answer that. The second thing again was we have seen a high turnover in staff here and what we’re experience is that there are quite a few new employees coming in with either greater skillsets of greater demands and they want to see the utilize the technology to be a little more efficient. So we’re trying to meet those needs but, again, both the time and the budget is a challenge. Then again, as Heather mentioned too, the training side of that, we unfortunately do kind of training as needed. We don’t really have time to sit down and do a full course. It’s typically you run into a problem, and I have the utilities or the ability to find what I need and train myself up to fix that problem. We’d certainly like to get to the point where we can be a little bit more expert level, at least at a higher degree in some of the applications. The other thing is the technology, especially the virtual stuff, is changing. I don’t anticipate the virtual environment to go away. I think that’s going to continue here as people get used to that and it makes it a little easier for people to work from remote locations, especially Council now. I see that actually taking off and probably not going back to the way it was. With that, it kind of puts some demands on the virtual environment here. It does require a couple of people to run a virtual meeting so that’s been a challenge. To answer the question that came up earlier, too, what technology was spent? The first thing we spent as far as the funding that we got available for the CARES is on improving the AV systems here so we could actually do this hybrid meeting. It’s actually quite easy to do a strictly virtual meeting but when you blend the cameras in along with the virtual meeting participants, it’s still a bit of a challenge and someone has to manage that piece of it. So it’s those sorts of things that become a challenge here. Then again, we’ve got to kind of plan for the future too. We kind of see things with technologies going. We’re a small city, but when it comes to security we have the same risks as Minneapolis or St. Paul. Maybe not as big a target but again, a target. So keeping up with the security side of that is a real chore. I’ll open it up for any questions. Mayor Ryan: Councilman McDonald, do have any questions for Mr. Rice or Ms. Johnston? Jerry McDonald: Well, I thank you for your answers to your question. I think you got around to, what I’m kind of looking for. I’m looking to assign a priority to this and what I mean by that is, City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 11 is this something that we need to look at now and move it up in the budget schedule, or is this something that again within the budget schedule could wait until next year? Why I’m asking is because I know that during COVID you have had to kind of step up what IT can and cannot do. So that’s why I was question the question because when to being to look at all of this for a budget number, I don’t think IT was, it’s always been a priority. Don’t get me wrong. I don’t think it was maybe the problem that it is becoming and that’s what I’m trying to get at the heart of is how critical is this at this point? Is this something that we could wait an additional 12 months to bring someone on, or is this something that because of circumstances we probably do need to look at it now? That’s what my question was all about, so thank you. Mayor Ryan: Did you want to respond, Ms. Johnston? Heather Johnston: Madam Mayor, Councilmember McDonald, I would say what happened with COVID really emphasized that this is such a priority just because we are so dependent on technology in every way, shape, and form and I think if we knew last September what we know now, I think that you would have seen a request for this IT person last year. Hindsight is always 20/20 but I would say that in order to move forward with a lot of things that we’re hearing from Council I think the sooner we can get this filled the better, especially when it comes to… It’s not just about doing new things either it’s really about supporting and maintaining what we have and I think that where I get most concerned as your City Manager, is making sure that we can 1) maintain what we have now but it’s also a very competitive environment as you probably know for IT personnel so I would expect that, we probably don’t need 100% of this salary on day one because it takes a while to get them hired. Any acceleration of this I think would be, certainly in my view, warranted as a priority. Mayor Ryan: Ms. Johnston, if I could jump in here to tag on that last comment as well as Councilman McDonald’s question. It’s $32,000 gap that we’re looking between the 2.77 or 2.5 so that was why we brought up the IT employee and so by utilizing that $32,000 it would only be for half of the year. We know that the request is coming for 2022 when we were looking out for our one to two-year budget planning. Mr. Rice had made us aware that this request for a full-time employee is going to come in 2022. We recognize the importance of getting somebody on board sooner and that was the difference of utilizing that $32,000 for at least a half of a year to get the ball rolling, recognizing the increase in technology demands. The web site improvements, there are so many technology pieces that we’re looking to implement right away in 2021 and so to get somebody on board halfway through the year. Heather Johnston: Madam Mayor, that’s about a third of the cost of the FTE and so it would be closer to start looking halfway throughout the year unless the Council decided to allocate some one-time funds to be able to get that position in sooner in addition to that $32,000. I think Ms. Strey can certainly tell us what that dollar amount estimate is but I think it’s roughly a third of the year. So, in order to fill it sooner that, we would have to request some one-time funds as well. Mayor Ryan: Mr. Rice, any further comments? City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 12 Rick Rice: Not unless there are other questions for me, no. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Thank you. Councilman McDonald, any other questions or comments at this time? Jerry McDonald. No, that was the big thing I wanted to look at was to ask that question, trying to get a difference between 2.5 and 2.77 so that answered the question. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Councilwoman Tjornhom, any comments or questions at this time? Bethany Tjornhom: Not at this time: Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Councilwoman Coleman? Julia Coleman: Per usual Madam Mayor, Councilman McDonald hit the nail on the head and asked the same questions that I had in mind, so no additional questions from me. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Councilman Campion? Dan Campion: No further questions right now. Mayor Ryan: I don’t have any questions either. I didn’t really have a question it was more, I’m glad Councilman McDonald brought it in in advocating for the 2.7. I know we had worked hard as a Council, or asked staff to work hard to figure out ways to get down to 2.5 to save those extra few dollars which we all know are very important to our residents. My biggest concern is we know that this is coming in 2022. We know that there’s going to be other budget constraints coming in 2020 that we’re already starting to plan for, and if we can get somebody on board to address our technology needs, it’s something that I am very much in support of because we talk about the demands internally of what our expectations our but I think the demand from our residents continue to come of having more efficiencies from the technology perspective and how they interact with the city and with different departments. To be able to have an extra person to support the two of you and the team and the technology, we spend a lot of money in software and hardware and I think we need to make that investment as well as an individual to really have the full complement of IT in this city with overall expectations of our residents. It’s something that I very much support. I know the decision is next week for us Council but I just wanted to share my feelings as well as it relates to the IT person. There’s no action tonight. It was just gathering public hearing for the 2021 budget which we collected. Kind of a last go around. Any other comments, questions, items that you want staff to look into further to bring back for our final meeting next Monday. I will just go around the horn again. Councilman McDonald? Jerry McDonald: I think I’ve raised the issues that I’m most concerned about and I think I received the answers that I believe I’m looking for so I’m actually fine until next week. City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 13 May Ryan: Thank you, Councilman. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Bethany Tjornhom: No, I’m good. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Councilwoman Coleman? Julia Coleman: No. I just wanted to say thank you to the staff for the countless hours that they have spent going through this again and again with us so that we do feel so prepared for next week, so thank you. Mayor Ryan: Nice comment. Thank you, Councilwoman. Councilman Campion? Dan Campion: I’m good with the material. Nothing additional at this point. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Thank you. Kelly, that you so much for the presentation and I don’t think we have any other questions. Thank you for joining us via Zoom tonight. We appreciate it. To the residents that are here in the room or still listening online we still welcome your questions or your comments. It won’t be part of the public hearing, per se, but we do address this again next Monday. We have an email on our website for public comment so if you have further questions or feedback, please don’t hesitate to send in those emails and they will be reviewed at our next meeting so thank you to those who came tonight to ask questions. We appreciate it. Next we have New Business and it was an item that I had removed from the Consent Agenda and it has to do with our 2021 police contract with the Carver County Sheriff’s Office. We often just approve this and it goes through the Consent Agenda as it was on tonight, but I just thought it was important as I receive different questions, particularly this year as it relates to our policing contract. Why we have a contract with the Carver County Sheriff’s Office versus having our own police department. I wanted to pull it up not to really scrutinize the contract in and of itself but just a couple questions as it relates to this. Ms. Johnston, I’m going to just put it out there. Obviously this is our biggest contract that we have. It’s 6% of our budget and if you could just address the difference between having a contract with the Sheriff’s Office versus what would it cost or what would it look like for the City Council to move away the contractual service to a full-time police department. Heather Johnston: Madam Mayor, thank you for the question and thank you for the heads up on the question so we could get some research to actually be able to answer this well. Jake Foster had done some research on our KFS, our Key Financial Strategies comparable cities, and really looked at their 2020 adopted police operating budgets just as a means of comparison. We have about a $2 million dollar contract for our services with Carver County. I do believe that Commander Mike Wollin is also listening in via Zoom in case there were questions. The range, if you will, of costs for other police departments in our comparable cities is really Lino Lakes at about $4 million, $4.1 million all the way up to Stillwater that has about an $11.6 million budget City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 14 for their police department. The average of our KFS cities is really about $6.7 million for their police department. That includes Chaska, our neighbor, at about $4.7 million. Mayor Ryan: Is this public information? Heather Johnston: Yes, it’s certainly public information. I’m not sure how I can pull it up. Mayor Ryan: Does the camera work over there? Heather Johnston: We’ll try and get the other camera working. I promised him one camera but they’re just so good. See, this is the thing. This is why we need more of them. This is kind of hard to read, and this isn’t really their operating budgets so it doesn’t include the one-time startup that you might have associated with that which might involve vehicle purchases and things like that. I would say that you would probably just over double your costs associated with, if we were not to have a contract if we wanted to start up our own department, there would be additional administration costs and such. You would probably be looking at two to three times what we’re currently paying for our contract. Mayor Ryan. Okay. Thank you. I think it’s important. Again, it’s a question that I receive a lot of. Is it time for the City to, and maybe this is a question for Mr. Wollin if or Ms. Johnston, whoever wants to answer, when the question is how do you determine when it’s time to go to a full-time police department versus contracting. Ms. Johnston? Heather Johnston: Madam Mayor and member of the Council, I think there number of factors. I think cost is only one factor. I think there is an identity factor. There is a control factor if for some reason you felt you weren’t getting the services out of Carver County that you felt the citizens needed and deserved, then you might need to have an independent police department. So it really comes down to service level and how that relationship is working, I would say. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Perfect. Thank you. Did you say Mr. Wollin is on… Heather Johnston: Commander Wollin, I’m not sure if he’s… Mayor Ryan: Commander Wollin, are you on? Commander Wollin: Yes, I am here Madam Mayor. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Thank you for being here tonight. I appreciate it. Or joining us via Zoom. I appreciate it. A quick question for you. It has to do with police state aid and how it’s distributed. Is that something that you can speak to? I know there was a $35,000 decrease. Is that something that you can speak to? City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 15 Commander Wollin: I can touch on that a little bit. We had looked at recalculating state aid reimbursement for the cities when we had looked at how the reimbursement was occurring. We had discovered that we had been over reimbursing cities that way so the recalculation was to get more in line with the actual number of hours for what contract communities account for. Mayor Ryan: So that’s the money that comes in from the State to the County and then the County allocates that to the cities? Is that a correct understanding? Commander Wollin: Right. The money comes from the State and they it’s a pass-through for us as distribute the reimbursement to the cities. Mayor Ryan: Okay. I’m not sure if this a city question or Commander Wollin, but I know that there was some union negotiation that still has to take place on the County’s end. How is that, if things dramatically change on their end, what is the City then obligated, if there is a difference, what is the obligation for the city and is it something that we need to budget for if there’s an increase: Heather Johnston: Madam Mayor, I’ll take it and then I’ll ask Commander Wollin to chime in on whether our understandings match. The Sheriff’s Office did change in terms of its calculation to provide more stability to cities. Specifically, they said that they froze the contact at last year’s amount. Then next year that contract will include any differential in salary that would have been in this year with a settled contract. There would essentially be a year lag every year in terms of actual dollar amounts so you would budget for it sort of in arrears. What end’s up happening is if we did get to a point where Chanhassen wanted to have their own police department, I would imagine that there would be some sort of a true-up payment is kind of how I’m understanding it. I’m going to ask Commander Wollin to chime in on whether I’m understanding that correctly. Mayor Ryan: Just for clarification, Commander, I’m not asking in terms of switching to a full- time police department. Rather, if your contract negotiations then lead to an increase with the union and that, in turn, comes back to, your city’s paying more. What Ms. Johnston just said is that there a year lag so will that continue year after year or then when it comes to 2022, let’s say there’s a 2% increase this year and a 2% increase that next year, then should we anticipate a 4% increase or will it just continue to be a year lag with any type of increase? Commander Wollin: Madam Mayor, what we are going with is basically that year lookback and so it would be the lag and then we would perpetuate that method in successor agreements. I want to make sure I’m not getting certainly confused with the question. When we look for a true-up, that would be if the city elected to decrease the level of services they contract with the Sheriff’s Office or terminate as a whole, then what we would have seen with that increase and so we would look to true-up those costs for services already rendered. Mayor Ryan: That makes sense. Again, my concern obviously with our contract with the Sheriff’s Office being our biggest contract and one to two to three to four percent jumps are City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 16 significant. I just want to make sure that we don’t all of a sudden get hit with a double increase from last year and then going forward. Knowing that it’s lookback or a year lag, that’s helpful just from a planning perspective so thank you for the clarification. My last question, and I know it’s a question that the County gets often, is one that I do as well, it’s reference about body cameras. Is that something that the County is seriously considering going to having their officers where body cameras? Commander Wollin: Madam Mayor, yes. The County is looking at a body-worn camera program implementation. We’re certainly in the early phases in regards to review of vendors out there of what’s offered as far as equipment and certainly what the best is for us moving forward with that. But yes, we are looking at the implementation of a body-worn camera program. But there are steps to take as we develop that. Mayor Ryan: Okay. And that equipment cost falls under the Article 5 in terms of equipment covered by the County or is that part of the negotiation? Commander Wollin: The equipment piece or what we would look at on the equipment generally and many time the outfitted deputy or deputy in the community, the equipment costs are the upfront as the one-time purchase made by the County and then the ongoing operational costs or whatnot or what, is phased in or developed into the contract. Mayor Ryan: Okay. So that will be a discussion going forward in terms of the costs associated with body cameras. Commander Wollin: Yes. Mayor Ryan: But not part of this contract, correct? Commander Wollin: It is not part of this contract, no. Mayor Ryan: Okay. But that’s the direction that the County is going is body cameras? Commander Wollin: Correct. Mayor Ryan: When do you, do you have timing for that? Is that next year, 2022? Commander Wollin: So we would look at the implementation we are looking to have that as we develop through 2021 that we would have that implemented going forward for 2022. When we look at costs or potential increases as it relates to equipment as we come to successor agreements or the 2022 agreement is where we would look at, that discussion in rates as far as contract talks. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Perfect. That’s good to know just for a heads up when planning for 2022. Commander, I appreciate your time tonight. I’m going to ask Council if they have any questions City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 17 for you or for city staff. If no questions come up then Council I would stand for a motion that, if you can pull it up on your or our screen, but I will go around to see if there any questions. Councilman McDonald? Jerry McDonald: (unintelligible interference) …per se but I would like to say that if it ever came down to a discussion about issues involved and what we’ve… with tonight so, I mean based upon that, I… about the contract. Could you hear me? Mayor Ryan: No, I was just about to say we heard bits and pieces so you wouldn’t mind restating that. You kind of froze up here a little bit. Jerry McDonald: Okay. Can you hear me okay? Mayor Ryan: Yes. Jerry McDonald: What I had said, and I’ll try to remember it, is that I believe that going forward if we ever the discussions about whether or not we should have our own police department, the numbers that have been put out here tonight I think are grossly underestimations of what it would be. I think that if we ever had that discussion going forward, I would just like to put out there that I think it’s more than double or triple our current numbers. Having said that, I have no questions about the current contract so I’m okay with that. You had raised a number of issues and I did want to address anything about going forward with looking at independent policing. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilman McDonald. Councilwoman Tjornhom? Bethany Tjornhom: No, this was a great discussion. Thank you but I have no questions. Mayor Ryan: All right. Councilwoman Coleman? Julia Coleman: No questions from me at this time. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Councilman Campion? Dan Campion: No questions. Mayor Ryan: All right. Thank you. I asked my questions up front. Commander, again I appreciate it. I want to reiterate I know we’re just talking about the contract tonight and we haven’t done this in past meetings, but we absolutely appreciate and value the relationship that we have with the Carver County’s Sheriff’s Office. We absolutely value the service that they provide our residents and the County as a whole. I just want to make that very clear that we are in great support of our Sheriff’s Office but thank you for answering the questions as it related to the contract. I appreciate it. With that, are there any motions that any Councilmember would like to make: City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 18 McDonald: Madam Mayor, I’ll make the motion. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Coleman seconded that the City Council approves the 2021 contract for policing services with the Carver County Sheriff’s Office. All voted in favor and the motion carried with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: Thank you again, Commander. Thank you, Ms. Johnston. That’s it for New Business. Tonight we have Council Presentations. Council McDonald, any Council Presentation? Jerry McDonald: Yes, Mayor. I would like it very much if you would give us a rundown as to what happened with the tree lighting. I saw a part of it. Again, we talked about IT tonight and the importance of all of that. I know that we did all of that live streaming… (unintelligible interference). Mayor Ryan: You’re frozen again. Jerry McDonald: …run data as to what happened because you were there by yourself with just your family. You guys hearing me? Mayor Ryan: Yep. We heard you. You’re looking for a rundown of the annual tree lighting and I was planning on saying something, so I’ll say it right now. First of all, it was so much fun. It was disappointing not to have residents there to join in the festivities but hats off to our amazing City staff for getting creative again and allowing it to be done virtually. Ours Park’s crew is phenomenal and the amount of lights, I don’t know if you’ve been, had a chance to get down here to see the streaming lights but they are just absolutely magnificent. We just had a fun night. There was just, it was my family and about 8 members of City staff. We had a nice time and really appreciate the number of people that watched it online. Again, hats off to our staff because they sure do an amazing just and to be able to celebrate the holidays driving through downtown is something special. I was very pleased to be a part of it and be able to carry on the great tradition that we have with the tree lighting ceremony. Hopefully, next year we can have the residents back and reindeers and Santa roaming around. Thank you for asking, though, Councilman McDonald. I appreciate it. Jerry McDonald: Thank you for the synopsis of what happened thanks for doing that. Mayor Ryan: Absolutely. Thank you. Councilwoman Tjornhom, any presentations? Bethany Tjornhom: No. Mayor Ryan: All right. Councilwoman Coleman? Julia Coleman: None for me. City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 19 Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion? Dan Campion: None for me. Mayor Ryan: All right. I just have one final send off on behalf of Council, we have Deputy Zydowsky, I want to read a letter from Council tonight: Dear Deputy Zydowsky, On behalf of the City Council, I want to thank you for 32 years of service to the residents of Carver County—24 directly serving the City of Chanhassen. Starting in Chanhassen as a Community Service Officer before starting as a County Deputy Sheriff in 2000. A team player, your kindness and approachable nature have been a credit to law enforcement. You truly embody the Sheriff’s Department’s mission to “serve everyone with respect and dignity and to do so with honor, integrity and pride.” Your passion for lifelong positive impact with the youth in our community is evident by your 11-year tenure as the School Resource Officer at the Chanhassen High School. Many citizens are familiar with ‘Officer Bob’ and go out of their way to stay connected, both the youth in the community and those that have grown into adulthood. Thank you for your service to our community and to the public as well. We will miss you here at the City of Chanhassen, and hope you enjoy your much deserved retirement in your new home in Wisconsin. Enjoy your well-deserved retirement, Officer Bob. Congratulations and best wishes from all of us on this new phase of your life. Thank you for many years of keeping us safe. Mayor Ryan: Warmest regards from myself as well as the City Council, City Staff, and all the residents in Chanhassen. Thank you Deputy Zydowsky and we wish you the best. That’s it for Council Presentations. Any Administrative Presentations? Heather Johnston: No, Madam Mayor. Mayor Ryan: Nothing on the Correspondence. With that, I would entertain a motion to adjourn? Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The council meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Submitted by Heather Johnston Interim City Manager City Council Truth in Taxation Hearing – December 2, 2019 20 Prepared by Kim Meuwissen CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Ordinance XXX: Approve the Rezoning of 1601 Lake Lucy Road (Island) and Approval of Summary Ordinance for Publication Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2. Prepared By Sharmeen AlJaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202023 PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council approves rezoning the property located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road, with an approximate area of 9.03 acres, from Rural Residential to Planned Unit DevelopmentResidential incorporating the attached standards, Summary Ordinance and adoption of the Finding of Fact and Recommendation.” Approval requires a 4/5 Vote. SUMMARY The applicant is requesting to rezone the property from Rural Residential, RR, to Planned Unit Development Residential, PUDR. BACKGROUND The site is located south of Lake Lucy Road and is surrounded by Lake Lucy. The site has an area of approximately 9.03 acres and is currently zoned Rural Residential District, RR. Access to the site is gained via Lake Lucy Road. DISCUSSION On December 1, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved this request unanimously. Staff was directed to work with the applicant to incorporate an Operations and Maintenance Plan of the bridge language as part of the PUD Ordinance Standards. The Ordinance governing the site has been revised to incorporate the Operations and Maintenance Plan provision. The Planning Commission minutes are attached to this report. RECOMMENDATION “The Chanhassen City Council approves rezoning the property located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road, with an approximate area of 9.03 acres, from Rural Residential to Planned Unit DevelopmentResidential incorporating the attached standards, Summary Ordinance and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectOrdinance XXX: Approve the Rezoning of 1601 Lake Lucy Road (Island) and Approval ofSummary Ordinance for PublicationSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2.Prepared By Sharmeen AlJaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202023PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council approves rezoning the property located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road, with anapproximate area of 9.03 acres, from Rural Residential to Planned Unit DevelopmentResidential incorporating theattached standards, Summary Ordinance and adoption of the Finding of Fact and Recommendation.”Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.SUMMARYThe applicant is requesting to rezone the property from Rural Residential, RR, to Planned Unit DevelopmentResidential, PUDR.BACKGROUNDThe site is located south of Lake Lucy Road and is surrounded by Lake Lucy. The site has an area of approximately9.03 acres and is currently zoned Rural Residential District, RR. Access to the site is gained via Lake Lucy Road.DISCUSSIONOn December 1, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved this request unanimously. Staff was directedto work with the applicant to incorporate an Operations and Maintenance Plan of the bridge language as part of thePUD Ordinance Standards. The Ordinance governing the site has been revised to incorporate the Operations andMaintenance Plan provision. The Planning Commission minutes are attached to this report.RECOMMENDATION“The Chanhassen City Council approves rezoning the property located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road, with an approximate area of 9.03 acres, from Rural Residential to Planned Unit DevelopmentResidential incorporating the attached standards, Summary Ordinance and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Recommendation Development Review Application Narrative Ordinance Concept Plans Septic Field Sizing Calculations Letter from Alan Weingart dated received November 18, 2020 Public Hearing Notice & Affidavit of Mailing Email from Betsy Randall dated December 1, 2020 Email from Gregory Fast dated November 25, 2020 Email from Kim and Tom McReavy dated December 1, 2020 Summary Ordinance Exhibit B Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated December 1, 2020 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: December 1, 2020 CC DATE: December 14, 2020 REVIEW DEADLINE: January 11, 2021 CASE #: 2020-18 BY: SJ, ET, EH, JS SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezoning of property from Rural Residential District to Planned Unit Development-Residential LOCATION: 1601 Lake Lucy Road APPLICANT : John Wicka PROPERTY OWNER: John and Ann Wicka 2547 Bridle Creek Trail 2547 Bridle Creek Trail Chanhassen, MN 55317 Chanhassen, MN 55317 john.wicka@gmail.com (612) 805-6250 PRESENT ZONING: Rural Residential District, RR 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (1.2 – 4.0 units/net acre) ACREAGE: 9.03 acres DENSITY: 0.02 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving Rezonings because the city is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning must be consistent with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen City Council approves rezoning the Property described in Exhibit B, located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road, with an approximate area of 9.03 acres, from Rural Residential to Planned Unit Development-Residential incorporating the attached Ordinance with standards, Summary Ordinance and adoption of the Finding of Fact and Decision.” Subject Property Lake Lucy Road Lake Lucy City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 2 of 11 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, ARTICLE VIII. - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT BACKGROUND LOCATION/SITE DATA The site is located south of Lake Lucy Road and is surrounded by Lake Lucy. The site has an area of approximately 9.03 acres and is currently zoned Rural Residential District, RR. Access to the site is gained via Lake Lucy Road. ACCESS AND BRIDGE On December 13, 1993, the City Council approved a request for a Wetland Alteration Permit to allow improvements to a driveway and installation of a bridge to access the subject site. Three extensions were approved to this permit with the final extension granted on January 27, 1997. The work on the installation of the bridge and the driveway was completed on February 25, 1999. City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 3 of 11 LAND USE PLAN The Land Use Plan designates the areas around Lake Lucy as Residential. The subject site is designated Low Density Residential. This designation has been established to accommodate most residential districts are comprised of low-density, single-family detached housing. Within this category, net densities range from 1.2 to 4 units per acre. Low-density residential areas can be either zoned RSF (Residential Single Family), R-4 (Mixed Low Density), RLM (Residential Low and Medium Density), or PUD-R (Planned Unit Development-Residential). The owner of the subject property is requesting to build two homes, one of which is an Accessory Dwelling Unit. The density is in keeping with the guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. Subject Site Low Density Residential (Net Density 1.2-4 U it /A Residential Large Lot (2.5 Acres minimum. 1/10 Units per Acre) City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 4 of 11 REZONING The applicant is requesting to rezone the property from Rural Residential, RR to Planned Unit Development-Residential, PUD-R. The 2040 Land Use Plan shows this area designated for development as Low Density Residential. Appropriate zoning for this land use includes RSF, (Single-Family Residential), R-4 (Mixed Low Density), RLM (Residential Low and Medium Density), or PUD-R (Planned Unit Development- Residential). Staff has been working with the applicant since 2018. The site is unique and is the only island in the city. The typical “one size fits all” ordinances do not work well in this case. They can trigger requirements that would cause significant degradation to the site. The site contains bluffs, is within the Shoreland Overlay District of Lake Lucy and has a 100% tree canopy cover. Subject Site City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 5 of 11 This is a lot of record and is entitled to build a single family home. The applicant’s request was to have a principle structure with an Accessory Dwelling Unit. This can either be achieved via subdivision or rezoning the site to Planned Unit Development (PUD). Subdivision Impacts: • Widening the existing driveway to 20 feet which will result in wetland fill. • Additional grading. • Additional tree removal. • Additional hard surface. • Adding the potential for two additional homes with a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet (up to 4 lots can be served via a private street which would require a variance). • Additional grading with the potential extension of utilities. PUD Impacts • Use of the existing private driveway. • One septic and well site. • Cap on the size of the Accessory Dwelling Unit. • Requiring the use of a single eternal driveway. • The PUD is the governing document that will establish limitations on the site. As options were evaluated, the applicant chose to request a PUD rezoning. Staff advised that the zone must have a minimum area of five acres which the subject site exceeds. Also, the Planned Unit Development ordinance permits two structures on a single lot. The use of a PUD allows the city to create a set of regulations that are unique to this property and ensures a higher set of standards is developed to govern this site. Staff directed the applicant to develop a concept plan. All comments are based on a concept that has the potential to change. The regulations that will be incorporated into the ordinance governing the site, will aim to improve the environmental quality of the site. Referrals were sent to agencies and city staff to gather feedback on how to improve development of this site. The one common theme was to combine the driveways accessing the structures. Staff discussed this recommendation with the property owner and he agreed to the recommendation. The applicant has demonstrated a continuous good faith effort in addressing concerns by making revisions to conceptual designs, improving the quality of vegetation on the island by removing buckthorn which is an invasive species. Development of the site will be governed by ordinances that will promote better development standards. The applicant is requesting the maximum floor area of the Accessory Dwelling Unit not to exceed 1,600 square feet. As a general rule, the city does not allow two dwelling units on a single lot. The use of the PUD would allow for the two structures. This application of a PUD cannot be applied to other large lots in the city because they are guided Large Lot (2.5 Acre Minimum-1/10 Units per Acre. City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 6 of 11 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicant’s intent was to hold a neighborhood meeting to address questions and comments from neighboring properties. Due to the social distancing circumstances, this was not an option. The applicant did communicate via e-mail with property owners around Lake Lucy. City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 7 of 11 LANDSCAPING The applicant for the development of 1601 Lake Lucy has submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. They are as follows: Total upland area 7.07 ac. or 308,303 SF Baseline canopy coverage 100% or 308,303 SF Minimum canopy coverage required 55% or 169,566 SF Proposed tree preservation 61% or 188,577 SF The calculations are included to illustrate that the rezoning to PUD-R would meet the subdivision standards for tree removal. Since the plan submitted is conceptual, there is the possibility that the proposed tree preservation could increase or decrease. Planned unit developments are generally considered when the applicant can offer enhanced environmental preservation or increased sensitivity to the site. It is unclear as to whether or not the final building submittal will provide that, but staff recommends that the applicant explore opportunities for increased tree preservation on the property. ENGINEERING GENERAL COMMENTS Any and all utility and transportation plans submitted with this application have been reviewed only for the purpose of determining the feasibility of providing public utility and transportation facilities for the proposed PUD in accordance with the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates (City Standards) and the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances (Ordinances). A recommendation of approval does not constitute final approval of details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and points of access, grading, utility connections or points of discharge, which are depicted or suggested in the application. The applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings and/or supplemental information for the project with the building permit and/or Development Stage Application, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen Engineering and Public Works Department will review plans, in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or require modifications to the plans or drawings based upon conformance with City Standards, the Ordinances, the PUD plan, and the professional engineering judgment of the City Engineer. As such, it is the opinion of the Engineering Department that the proposed PUD can be developed in accordance with the requirements of the Ordinances (as it pertains to Engineering and Public Works requirements) and City Standards. However, after review of the PUD rezoning submittal materials, being conceptual in nature without much information, Engineering and Public Works staff did not find that the concept plan provided a significantly higher quality or more sensitive proposal (Sec. 20-501), or offered enhanced environmental sensitivity beyond normal ordinance requirements (Sec. 20-506) as it pertains to Engineering and Public Works requirements. PUD FINDINGS The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) affects and our findings regarding them are: City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 8 of 11 a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official city Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed Planned Unit Development has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of the land use plan and has been found to be consistent with the official city Comprehensive Plan. It complies with providing single-family homes that meet density requirements. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed use is compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Staff has prepared an ordinance that will regulate the site and ensure specific regulations are adhered to. c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The proposed uses will conform with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as bluff setbacks, shoreland setbacks, etc. The ordinance regulating the site will add additional higher standards and establish limitations that govern the site. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed use is consistent with and compatible with all surrounding parcels that have been guided or have developed as single-family homes. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. Finding: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area however, due to the location of the island in relation to utilities and due to the potential impact on the natural features of the site, the applicant will provide an on-site septic system and well. The applicant also intends to sprinkle the home. These steps will ensure the proposed use will not overburden the city's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The request is for a single-family home and an accessory dwelling unit. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 9 of 11 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: The City Council approves rezoning the Property described in the attached Exhibit B “Property” with an approximate area of 9.03 acres to Planned Unit Development-Residential, incorporating the following standards: PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a Residential Low Density Development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Except as modified by these development standards, the standards of the Residential Low Density District, RSF, shall apply. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through building permit application based on the development standards outlined below. b. Uses 1. The permitted uses within the development shall be one single-family home and one accessory dwelling unit. 2. The accessory dwelling unit may not be sold separately from the main single-family structure. 3. Short-term lease of the Accessory Dwelling Unit is prohibited. A short-term is defined as a lease of less than three months. 4. The accessory dwelling unit shall have a maximum of two bedrooms and may not exceed 1,600 square feet of footprint area. 5. Due to the unique access and lack of a viable water source to support fire suppression activity, the city strongly encourages the petitioner to install a fire suppression system for the residential buildings on the property. The design and installation should be done by a qualified fire suppression engineer. 6. The two homes must utilize one access driveway into the homes which must be shared access until the driveway comes within 50 feet of the first dwelling unit at which point they can split. 7. Prior to any site clearing, a walk-through of the grading limits with the city forester to review opportunities for tree preservation is required. 8. The total footprint area of all detached accessory buildings excluding the accessory dwelling unit, must not exceed 2,000 square feet collectively and no individual detached accessory structure shall exceed 1,000 square feet of foot print area. 9. All water-oriented structures must comply with applicable City ordinances. 10. The Property shall have a maximum of two docks. City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 10 of 11 11. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the Property, an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for the existing bridge and a Bridge Safety Inspection Report shall be submitted to the City. The O&M Plan shall be prepared by a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Minnesota and the Inspection Report shall be prepared by a MnDOT Certified Bridge Safety Inspector. The O&M Plan and Inspection Reports shall include applicable information concerning Timber structures. The Owner of the Property shall submit to the City routine inspections of the bridge every 24-months per the MnDOT Bridge and Structure Inspection Program Manual. Upon results of the initial Inspection Report, the bridge load limit shall be clearly posted at the site entrance on Lake Lucy Road per applicable Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) requirements except for the size of the sign which must be no less than 12 inches x 18 inches as shown in Exhibit A. If at any time a routine Inspection Report indicates the posted load limit is no longer valid, the signage shall be revised to reflect current conditions. As the bridge is privately owned and maintained and does not cross a public right-of-way, the City assumes no responsibility in reviewing or approving the O&M Plan and/or Inspection Reports, and takes no responsibility for the O&M of the bridge. The property Owner is solely responsible and shall comply with all applicable findings and recommendations of the routine Inspection Reports. c. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks: Boundary Building Setback Lake Lucy Ordinary High Water Mark 75 feet Bluff Setback 30 Hard Surface Coverage 25 % Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 feet or 3 stories, whichever is less City Council 1601 Lake Lucy Road Rezoning December 14, 2020 Page 11 of 11 ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Application 3. Narrative 4. Ordinance 5. Concept Plans 6. Septic Field Sizing Calculations 7. Letter from Alan Weingart dated Received November 18, 2020 8. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List 9. E-mail from Betsy Randall dated December 1, 2020 10. E-mail from Gregory Fast dated December 1, 2020 11. E-mail from Kim and Tom McReavy dated December 1, 2020 12. Summary Ordinance 13. Exhibit B 14. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated December 1, 2020 g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-23 1601 lake lucy road (island)\staff report cc rezoning.doc R-}J>-13 COMTIIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227 -1 100 / Fax: (952) 227-LLLO CITY OT CIIAI,IHASSII'I APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW r I,,\el 6O-Day Revi6r/ Daie:l>/ eq \aa Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Retq to tE qpropiale Applicalim Cl,€cklin to( re,quited su&n al inlqnation tlat n s *canpany this aqdicatbl) E Comprehensive Plan Amendment......................... $600 ! Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 E Conditional Use Permit (CUP) E Single-Family Residence .I ntt ohers E tnterim Use Permit (lUP) s300 fl Create over 3 lots .......................$600 + $15 per lot( lots) $32s $/25 Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300 fl Lot Line Adjustment E Final P|at....... (hcludes 9450 escrofl for atrorney c6ts)* ,Additional escrow may be requa,ed lor o(her applicatjors through the development contrd. $750 E vacation of Easementsi/Right-of-way (vAc)........ $300 $100 Gdditional recordiog tues may apply) ! subdivision (SUB) E create g lots or less !tr $1so $1so $700ntr ln conjunction with Single-Family Residence.. $325 All Others............. ............... $425 E Rezoning (RE4 El Planned unit Development (PUD) . E Minor Amendment to existing PUD E Sign Plan Review.......-.......................-.................. $150 E Site Plan Review (SPR) E wetland eteration Permit (wAP) ntr Adminisrative...... ............... $100 Commerciaulndustrial Districts"...................... &500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square teet of building area( thousand square feet) *lnclude n um ber of g!E!!g em ployees: 'lnclude number of 4gg emPloyees: fItr Single-Family Residence All Others E zonino Appeal $200 $150 $275 $100 E zoning Ordinance Amendment (zOA)$500 E Residential Distric6 $s00 !!Z!E: When multiple applications are prgcessed co.lcu.rendy, $e app,opriate tee shail b€ charged tsr each application. Plus $5 per dwelling unit ( units) E Notification Sign (city m install and remo,/e)s200 I Rroperty Owners' Lbt within EIOO' (city to seneraE after tre-aporicatio meai"s) ......"..fi5- ;d;;;;, ..........'$a per address E Escrou/ for Recording Documents (check all that apply) conditional Use Permit Interim Use Perm it ! Site Plan Agreement Vacation n variance nn Wetland Alteration Permat tr Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) [ Easements ( easements) TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required lnformation Description of Proposal: 1601 Lake Lucy Road, Excelsior, MN 55331 Parcel #:254070200 Legal Description: 9.03 wetlands Present?n ves E r.to See attached survey Total Acreage: Present Zoning Rural Residential District (RR) Present Land Use Oesignation:Residential Lo\rv Planned Unit Development (PUD) E se Designation . Residential Low Densityfil Requested zoning: Requested Land u Existing Use of Properry:Ruture Home Site Elcheck box if separate nanative is attached. suoniua oae IQP.!2!- "" D*E{-LL}2- "" o*, $50 per document Deeds $1,099.00 Property Address or Location: Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant lnformation APPUCANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization lrom he propefty owner to file fiis application. I agree to be bound by cond,tions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. lf this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have atiached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom he City should contact regarding any matter penaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consuhing fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I cenify thal the anformation and exhibiB submitted are true and conect. Name Address Contact: Phone: city/statezip: Email: Cell: Fax: Signature:Date: PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand fiat conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subiect only to the right to ob,ect at the hearings or durino the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of lhe deadlines for submission of material and the progress ol this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I cenify that the information and exhibits subm itted are true and conect. John VMcka Address: Name:Contact: Phone: City/Statetz ip: Email: Chanhassen, MN 55317 Cell: Fax: Oate Cell: Fax: Contact Phone: john.wicka@gmail.com Signature:LOl30l20 This application must be completed in tull and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriale Application Checklist and confr with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requiremeflts and fees. Section 4: Notification lnformation who should receive copies of staff repons? trtrtr D Propeny Owner Via:Applicant Via I uano Paper copy E laaieo Paper copy E Mailed Paper copy E Mailed Paper copy trtr Email Email INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fiebs, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital SAVE FORM PRItiIT FORM SUBMIT FORM engineer Via E Emailoher via E Email f,,o-o. Address: ciry/state/zip: F-"i1. 2547 Bridle Creek Trl. (612) 80s-62s0 PROJECT ENGINEER (it applicable) A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business da)6 of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. 'Other Contact lnformation : Nr-o'- Address: _ CMStateZip: _a-"il copy to the city br processino. PUD Rezoning Request I am asking the City of Chanhassen to consider rezoning our property located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road, to Planned Unit Development - Residential. The property itself is unique, primarily because it is an island. A road and bridge were constructed out to the island approximately 22 years ago. For several years my wife and I have been looking for a larger parcel of land to build a home. A primary reason for that was so we could build a living space nearby for my mother who is now 86 years old. The island was a perfect opportunity for us to build living quarters near but still allow my mother to keep her independence. In the fall of 2018, we set out to design a home that would achieve all of these goals by creating essentially two living structures combined by a tunnel or skyway. Unfortunately, every option we explored led to a dead end. The island is an amazing piece of geography - beautiful in every way, but it also provides many home building challenges to overcome. After trying to “piece together the puzzle” for a year, we paused our design plans as we were temporarily exhausted from running into blockers. After consulting with our architect, we realized that the opportunity to create two separate living structures on the 8 acre parcel (not including the driveway down to the island) dramatically simplifies many aspects of the design and build. To accomplish this goal, we needed some flexibility of ordinances. This is the reason we are requesting a rezoning of the island to Planned Unit Development - Residential. This zoning category allows flexibility, but in turn requires high design standards. I hope to demonstrate that we intend to meet the higher standards. We have included several documents to add some additional context to the application and address some known concerns in your consideration. Included are: A composite map showing all of the highlighted features together. A map showing a preliminary design of the two living structures and accessory building and the total buildable area. A map showing proposed (but optional) water preservation areas. A map showing no water preservation areas. A map showing the total grading limits without the water preservation areas. A map showing the total grading limits with the water preservation areas. A map showing the total hard surfaces for the plan and the septic system and drainfield area. A Site Information summary showing critical square footage elements and calculations of these designs. A septic system drainfield sizing analysis by a licensed septic designer. The natural beauty of the island is undeniable, but in 2018 it was deep into the cycle of being overtaken by an invasive species - buckthorn. Shortly after purchasing the property, we worked with Jill Sinclair to get direction on removing the buckthorn. This was no simple matter. This invasive species was quite literally taking over the island and muscling out other native trees and plants. We hired one of the specialists Jill recommended and cut, treated and removed an astonishing amount of buckthorn. That effort returned the island to it’s natural balance. In our plans to build we intend to preserve that beauty in every way possible. We are planning to build “green” structures using solar for power, geothermal for heating/cooling, green roofs on parts of the structures, highly efficient building designs, rain water harvesting for watering the lawn and vegetation and various other plans to minimize our impact on the environment. Furthermore, as we get deeper into the design process, we plan to engage a civil engineer to assist with both a grading and erosion control plan to introduce the appropriate amount of water management located near the driveways to account for any run-off towards the lake including french drains, rain garden, etc. Given the majority of the current bluff conditions (mainly exposed soli), we propose addressing any susceptible bluff areas with native plantings to help mitigate potential erosion. Obviously, in the building process we will be impacting the island and vegetation, but the bulk of the tree removal will be on the interior of the island and the driveways on the island are designed to be appropriately narrow for the tree canopy to grow over. The bluff areas and shorelines will not be affected in terms of tree and canopy coverage. The grading limits and calculations have been provided in the accompanying documents. Additionally, we have ordered a tree survey from an expert (again recommended by Jill - thank you Jill!) and will make it available as soon as it is complete. A few weeks ago, I was able to walk the island with the Fire Chief, Don Johnson. Don shared his concerns and recommendations. One concern he shared was the ability for the larger fire trucks to navigate the island and have the ability to turn around. Since then, we have updated our plans to allow for turn around areas for the fire trucks. Don also recommended we design the living structures with fire suppression sprinkler systems. We plan to incorporate this into our designs going forward. Lastly, we hired a licensed septic designer (sourced from the approved contractor list on the Carver County website) to do some preliminary calculations to ensure we have enough area for the septic system and primary and secondary drain fields. The architectural drawings allow for 12,984 square feet for the septic system while his calculations call for only 11,000 square feet. Thank you for your consideration. John Wicka AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning all property described in the attached Exhibit B “Property” with an approximate area of 9.03 acres to Planned Unit Development-Residential. Section 2. The rezoning of this Property incorporates the following development design standards: DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a Residential Low Density Development. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Except as modified by these development standards, the standards of the Residential Low Density District, RSF, shall apply. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through building permit application based on the development standards outlined below. b. Uses 1. The permitted uses within the development shall be one single-family home and one accessory dwelling unit. 2. The accessory dwelling unit may not be sold separately from the main single-family structure. 3. Short-term lease of the Accessory Dwelling Unit is prohibited. A short-term is defined as a lease of less than three months. 4. The accessory dwelling unit shall have a maximum of two bedrooms and may not exceed 1,600 square feet of footprint area. 5. Due to the unique access and lack of a viable water source to support fire suppression activity, the city strongly encourages the petitioner to install a fire suppression system for the residential buildings on the property. The design and installation should be done by a qualified fire suppression engineer. 6. The two homes must utilize one access driveway into the homes which must be shared access until the driveway comes within 50 feet of the first dwelling unit at which point they can split. 7. Prior to any site clearing, a walk-through of the grading limits with the city forester to review opportunities for tree preservation is required. 8. The total footprint area of all detached accessory buildings excluding the accessory dwelling unit, must not exceed 2,000 square feet collectively and no individual detached accessory structure shall exceed 1,000 square feet of foot print area. 9. All water-oriented structures must comply with applicable City ordinances. 10. The Property shall have a maximum of two docks. 11. Prior to issuance of any building permit on the Property, an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for the existing bridge and a Bridge Safety Inspection Report shall be submitted to the City. The O&M Plan shall be prepared by a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Minnesota and the Inspection Report shall be prepared by a MnDOT Certified Bridge Safety Inspector. The O&M Plan and Inspection Reports shall include applicable information concerning Timber structures. The Owner of the Property shall submit to the City routine inspections of the bridge every 24- months per the MnDOT Bridge and Structure Inspection Program Manual. Upon results of the initial Inspection Report, the bridge load limit shall be clearly posted at the site entrance on Lake Lucy Road per applicable Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) requirements except for the size of the sign which must be no less than 12 inches x 18 inches as shown in Exhibit A. If at any time a routine Inspection Report indicates the posted load limit is no longer valid, the signage shall be revised to reflect current conditions. As the bridge is privately owned and maintained and does not cross a public right-of-way, the City assumes no responsibility in reviewing or approving the O&M Plan and/or Inspection Reports, and takes no responsibility for the O&M of the bridge. The property Owner is solely responsible and shall comply with all applicable findings and recommendations of the routine Inspection Reports. c. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks: Boundary Building Setback Lake Lucy Ordinary High Water Mark 75 feet Bluff Setback 30 Hard Surface Coverage 25 % Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 feet or 3 stories, whichever is less Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December 2020, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Heather Johnston, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-23 1601 lake lucy road (island)\ordinance.docx B DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: Buildable Area BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: Hard Surface Areas BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F 10' x10'STORAGE SHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 30' x 33' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE GARAGE 30' x 33' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: Water Management BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F 10' x10'STORAGE SHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 30' x 33' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE GARAGE 30' x 33' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: System and Septic Hard Surfaces BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F 10' x10'STORAGE SHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 30' x 33' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE GARAGE 30' x 33' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: Management No Water Grading Limit With BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: Grading Limit BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: Water Management Grading Limit BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: Composit View BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F 10' x10'STORAGE SHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 30' x 33' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE GARAGE 30' x 33' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' DRAWING A '03- 12 - nooN - edutitlA '03- 86 - nooN - edut itlA N W E S Summer Solstice June 22 Autumnal Equinox Sept 23March 21 Vernal Equinox June 22 Su mmer Solstice Winter Solstice Dec 22 Dec 21Winter Solstice SITE PLAN {SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"} LOT INFORMATION: SITE INFORMATION =33% 108,053 sq.ft. =37%. 119,726) sq.ft 322,329 sq.ft. =14.5% 308,303 sq. ft./44,585 sq. ft. 44,585 sq. ft. 5,420 sq.ft. 2,412 sq. ft. 10,542 sq. ft. 17,464 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 990 sq. ft 1,669 sq. ft. 4,998 sq. ft. 308,303 sq. ft. 108,956 sq. ft. (without water management) Grading Limit Area Alt. Grading Limit Area Total Island Area Lot Coverage: Total Impervious: Terrace Area: Accessory Driveway: Lower Driveway Area: Main Driveway Area : Garage Area: Storage Shed Accessory Struct. Footprint: Guest House Footprint: Main House Footprint: Lot Area: Buildable Area: Composit View BUILDINGS ROAD WAY ASPHALTRAIN GARDEN /WATER MANAGEMENT POSSIBLE SEPTIC FIELDGRADING LIMITIsland Residence Lake Lucy COPYRIGHT Charlie & Co. Design, LLC 09.28.2020 968 966 972 976 978 980 9 8 2 984986988990 992994996998 1000 1002 1004 1006 964962 960 964 990 992 994 996 998 1006 1004 1002 1000 990 980 970 974 970 9821002 988 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 986 988 990 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 972 974 976 978 982 984 986 988 992 994 996 998 1000 1002 1004 968 966 964 962 960 958 980978976974972970968966964962960958962966 964LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 75' LAKE SETBACK30' BLUFF SETBACK30' B LU FF SETB A C K 30' BLUFF SETBACK75' LAKE SETBACK 75' L A K E S E T B A C K NOT BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF BLUFF NOT BLUFF ROCK RET. WALL ROCK RET. WALL 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 12,554 sq.ft. SEPTIC FIELD 30' x 33' GARAGE WELL 30' x 33' GARAGE STORAGE SHED10' x10' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 30' x 33' STRUCTURE ACCESSORY B L U F F NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF NOT BLUFF B L U F F1684.93 (CO. CORD.)1685.01 (DESC)90°374.82 (MEAS) 375.00 (DESC)49.79 (M)50.0 (D)46± 90°90°OUTLOT C WHITETAIL COVE WHI T E T AI L C OVE GRA VEL RO A D B RI DGEWEST LINE GOV'T LOT 51.5" DIA. PIPE (NOT FOUND - IN WATER) LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY LAKE LUCY EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) EDGE OF WATER (ELEV.=956.3 (9/7/17)) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) O.H.W. LINE (ELEV.=956.1) 34.14 23±48.033 75.0 75.075.075.030 FT BLUFF SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK 75 FT O.H.W. SETBACK TOP OF SLOPE (P.O.B.) 968.6 969.4 990.0 9 9 4 .0 998.0999.7 996.6 968.7 968.7 969.0 968.6 993.0 993.0 993.2 989.7 988.0 1006.1 1007.3 1003.61002.3 1001.8 997.6 999.7 1002.01002.8999.7 989.11000.8 999.1 1004.3 997.0990.7983.6980.9 982.3 985.9 993.5 998.71004.01007.0 1002.3 995.6 993.0 1000.59 6 9.5 965.5 965.3 966.2 967.1 968.5 968.0 968.3 9 6 7 .6980.7 981.2981.9 982.9 980.6 968.1969.7969.8969 .0 969.1 964.0 961.9 961.9 961.8 9 6 8. 4 968.8 TOE OF SLOPE TOE OF S L OP ETOE OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPETOP OF SLOPE994.8969.8 965.9 990.9 9 9 4 .9969.9994.0969.0 993.0 968.0 969.7 994.7 30 303030 30 3030 3 0 NOT BLUFFNOT BLUF F B L U F F B L U F F B L U F F 10' x10'STORAGE SHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 30' x 33' 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE 2 STORY MAIN HOUSE GARAGE 30' x 33' 2 STORY GUEST HOUSE 30' x57' ALAN R. WEINGART 1685 STELLER COURT, EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 Mobile: (952) 239-5899 Email: alanweingart@gmail.com November 18, 2020 TO: Elise Ryan, Mayor Chanhassen City Council Chanhassen Planning Commission RE: Support of Wicka Rezoning of Island Property I am writing this letter of support having had over 25 years of experience with the island property that the Wicka’s are looking to rezone and build their home on. My spouse, Mary, and I purchased the island property back in 1994. At that time we also purchased the adjacent property at 1685 Steller Court, where we currently reside, from the same prior owners. We acquired certain permits with the property and began planning to construct vehicular access to the property. This process involved multiple governmental agencies, including the City of Chanhassen, the DNR and the Watershed District (Sharmeen al Jaff’s memory banks can be accessed for how this process unfolded and concluded!!). The 1800’ driveway and 72’ bridge were constructed over the 1998 – 1999 timeframe. Significant wetland mitigation, supervised closely by the City and the DNR, was completed during that construction timeframe. We left the island property in its natural state and used it for family and friend activities and as access to Lake Lucy for canoeing, kayaking and dog exercising. After our two sons grew up, we found ourselves using the property less and less, and reluctantly put it on the market in 2018. We were reluctant to sell it because we had thought about building on it but chose to build a Colorado home instead. Being adjacent to this property, we have a very unique setting from our home that overlooks the island property. Privacy has always been an important reason for living where we do, so selling the property was difficult for us, other than for the obvious remuneration we could receive. During the island sale process we were introduced to prospective buyers John & Anne Wicka. The sale process with them went smoothly and our reservations on selling the property quickly dissipated once we had met both of them. It quickly became evident that John and Anne had as much, if not more, respect for the integrity and environmental sensitivity of the island as we did. We discussed the topography, wetlands, wildlife, etc. with them and came away impressed with their desire to maintain as much ‘naturalness’ as they could when building their dream home on the property. One of the first things they did after buying was completely remove all of the buckthorn on the island and along the driveway. ALAN R. WEINGART 1685 STELLER COURT, EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 Mobile: (952) 239-5899 Email: alanweingart@gmail.com So, as not only the seller of the island to the Wicka’s, but also as an immediate neighbor, I fully support the City granting them a rezoning of the island property that allows for no more than two living structures, no subdividing or selling the property separately (the island always has to remain as one), amongst other reasonable restrictions that go along with such a rezoning. I believe that they are more than capable, financially and intentionally, of carrying out this rezoned building process in an environmentally-sensitive manner that blends in with the natural beauty of that unique parcel. Please let me know if any of you have questions on this zoning application as I am available to discuss and comment on any aspects of this property that may be of interest or concern to you. Regards, Alan R. Weingart CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( ss. CoTTNTYOFCARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 19,2020, the duly qualified and acting Deputy clerk ofthe ciry of chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of a Public Hearing to consider a request for Rezoning of property at 1601 Lake Lucy Road from Rural Residential to Planned unit Development-Residential (Low Density)' Planning case No.2020-23 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records ofthe County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. { Sub this scribed lcl ln d and swom to before me ay of l)a,-<-rr$<-r,2020. n1 \t'lssen.lerk (Seal) JEAII M SIECruIilGilcryPltS{fineE Notary Public ry*rfoi.ft!l,&a Subject Area Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not inlended to be used as one. This map is a @mptlation of records, informalion and data Iocated in various ctty county, sliate and federal offces and other sources regading lhe area shorvn. and is to be used for eierence purposes only The Crty does nol warant that the Geographic lnbrmaton System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map ale eror ftee, and the City does not represeni that the Gls Data can be used for navioatonal tracking or any other purpoae requiring exacling rneasuremeflt of distance or direclion or prcosion in the depk ion of geographic ieatures. The preceding disdaimer is povided pursuanl to Mi;nesota statutes 5466.03. subd. 21 (2000). and the user of this map acloowl€dges that the City shall not be liable tor any damages. and expressly waives all daams. and agrees lo debnd, indemnafy, and hold harmless the Caty from any and all ciaims brought by Uset, its employees or agents, or third Flartaes which atise out of lhe useis acae$ or use of clata provrded. <TAX-NAMET ITAX_ADD_L1l rTAX_ADD_L2> nNext Record rITAX-NAMEtt <TAX-ADD-Llr tTAX-ADD_L2r Subject Area Disclaimer This map is nerther a legally rc@rded maP nor a survey and is not intended to be used asone. This map isa @mpalalion of recods, inlormation and data located in vafious city, county, state and federal offces and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be osed for reference purposes only. The City does not warant that the Geographac lnformalion System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are eror f.ee, and lhe Crty does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigalronal, Itacking or any other purpose requidng exacling measuement of distance or dareclion or preclSion an the depiction of geographic ieatures. The preceding disclaimer is provided pu6uant to Minnesota Statules 5466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be laable for any damages, and expressly vraives all claims, and agrees lo defend. indemnify, and hold hamless the City from any and all daims brcught by User, its employees or agents, or third parties whach arise out of the use/s access or use of data provided. ),. ,J t ,g ! * (8 P \ I I r l-tt -rr I a 'l d a ! I.I \j, '! -{ 1r (a a {-rt !, E .g .g c E 'c I .9 F E c!oIF. ooNoN ID -o E o)ooo;op ()aF !2d) a) o =ooF.F e ID-o Eo o oo GI O =-9 t of(L E op ot o, Eo. -9(, o)o l!(, o)5E ed *aotr IEo:p6 9d (0x E,E.9?E6) OHoo,3bgo, o-c 9R G .9 = o ei ocg o oE r e o!tt OEEo>,!9o dr:i.a J; (o- o.6- o. (,3€€: Ef olY =on !!a.o.c- Y. OgEE Eo :o c ! ao ^>oE o6' ;,E:. 0): an =-U .,Ed'FO tr,' O 6r= cE 6; a g€ € E ::ag eE E! E ;S HE!iE;94;-9.9b!rE EeEeE9f;E *E3=e;= : i ; ggigEE Fqr9!E=Ebi g*€E€TE€ a.9E.sl(,Foo-.eR.8€ ..F O (0 eFNo$ E(, q) E .9 .2 E eo() I*iEiEIE EE$iEiEE iffiEfliiEi a)c .9 o (, oc =c Ec o, o co "cI6 3 B; o oo o) -oo) 3 -!, =o il,E o o)Eoo o- =o) o o rl)p oco g :, .g 6 o-lo(! o- oEc It) C,lo o,C'-oo, Ecil)E 3 c .o (DoE oc xo:o Dco o E It) o) o o o o)c.Po =UJz E 3 5 E p 3 I E E E aI g 6 ii E F c6 (, t!o o oIoJ E6o ELg o. c a! .9 CL >gtooEo.G9tG.J o5 ..o9CEoo an=OE3Ogo oE oo = P.9.= .,r 8.9oFJ-E .9o =o:.DG.ErE O(!.9f,otzB ot! E(! o C'tr oo =g.E Llaoaao'=-E(,E =o!odp ocgE.=-:AZ5 oot! (!Eo , q9rP BF b EE'E EilE $IE ;x Hgi* E,E 1="E Eoo,l2>trE6aExE I E b E6.e€ =gtEetSo cl E.= o-c E ;lI EEE ;gE€*i gi;IE ET g i$ei:f f#iEE:56=eEX EE$ B!€., o- o= o o)or rtl6N*d;i .\a:R o:, *E otr o6ot3f9i o-9 o-qe,>'6I q, .c, 't o (0 .9o d .E IDo EI Eo 0)-o c -g 0,E Q' Q' o (!; lo o !(0 o E '= Io aoE .9 .12 E Eoo oit ;cc,o d oc! o os e e o!tta:d6>.!9A' orit! oo(o- cEt to. ;f€ il.EEg * d5EE 5* # ;: e oll 6eEf Bq I € Ee eEE€ Ee! e9 E'F i3 :P:E 3t EE t E€EE AEE: i€ s* E sEg ;EEESEEE&i.e 3f tEe 5 6rEt I Feo..eE.e6Eii d E $€ .a... * 6o 0o, Eo ': -9 e E P .9 F E cioI F- (!oNoN o-o E()ooo q P (!E (, fF ! .>d) o o ooF.t- cf !oroEE x_qgI eear( IEo=p6 99. Y(t,"^t -(E ?r EE .ei-c o) E9 OO. 8Egr,, =.E(IE eR c o)o E c a,)I q)tr uioEc o)o,o c C' 0) Eco 3 ao'aooiE =oc 0) oEc(! o E o, o).: o)o o,) o o-:c.9(t =lrJz o o q) -o o); 0)-c focE o) oE(E El 0) o 0)!c Eocco o) l q) oE =E c,(!s o6) oI =33 iiiEiriisiiEi HffiiHHH ! 3 6 € E ;e 3 I I g Ee E e q E E !.q i s E E EI 3 E q 5 E i 3 8 E 6 I Et .e E iI E E 3 5 €..oPl:EOo th=OE3Ooo Go =ro >Et.9 o.G9to-J I iit @,=ct? Eg G= =t it .EF c6 o oo I ii) dr .= ar :icr :tf=!O(! .gct' =r 6 (, -o Eo o c o(J o- o a!ooJ :jooo CLI o. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooN rnN O < -r (D OO<l O !r,Olo -r 6O(n O.rF Fi N(n 9 '4 Iql l:.ql rn(o i. co6 0 0 ro 6 .r o F. 6 -r Fr Fr N ..{ N F.r N Cr La O O O O O O O O O O O E{ El n nl..|66ut 6 oO N.no o o.no o ooo uroo o ooo ooo ooQq o oN - - N u1 |J1 r,) an .n F u1 F lr1 r- F- F F rr1 N Fr ln m lr1 (n dl (n .n .n .o .n Q Q o oct.{.rolo lo(D O OO ro OOO () OO(O O F{ (O q1 qr Ol (11 OlorCn or orOO O O - 6 m .o O o o o o o <t o I o <l <t <l <l o o .n o @ co @ € oo o ao oo 0o (n rn .n .nz ti gl ti !n !n la u) r.n rn l,) la Ln Ln ln L,) ln rn rJt r/l r/1 lJ1 !n (1 6 6 ln rn ta !/1 Ln lJ1 g) tl t/)i N N N a\ (\ N N N N a! N N a\ a.,i N N N (t N N N at a.,l N a! N N a',1 N N N N N N o F.F r\N F.Nlnc|C|C)i I r xnx BRBBB s ++ S+ +f6SSSr- i F. O .o OOO OOO O O N !Q s O i F r- F F F F F- F F. F. r. F. r.. ilililfrnrsfififrrfrfrfrfrfrfi8sil8frfrfrililfrililfrilililfr ===?! E E [ [ I I I [ [ [ [ = = il [ ==============- - -2, Z Z Z Z, L 1111111 - --; z,:aaa= = > > = = > = = = = = = r q = 2=t=2,-====1n=1== ;'4445 6 E 5 E 6 6 E E E 6 5 534=.5 E 3 { 3A2QQQAA2A4 ;'=== HHHHHHHHH *HHH = = =H ============== 5H-- EG,G,EEs,E<+o66000060E=iitti=tttE=== =s=33333333<<;<uEuEv99Y9VVe9999fs3rs3sr3s5555 F.FTNO€NO(\Il,1OlnOOOO(o st Frms Fol Fr arl <t <toto ft1 (oln (o (o (o (o (o (o F I\ F F ao (n or <tt(O t< (O iO (O lO rO (O (lo rg (O (O @ (o tO PnnPEtEeeeE e eiaiia:::u--'i.>hr:r->esisr GGt==i=E3EEE5; - 6 d - I I F,r r.r r.r I i - j j j r.r F - !z !z !z Y I = = Y Y :a E: uJ Y ur uJ r! Y =3 S S t leee 3 t I e i-1,*t :,,Ae{ -r OO-r r{OFl !AOu1 O u)O ul !a !t) d -rP < l,) (o N Fr N d) <l Ln ln ro ro F F @ ctr c) o = t <t t rJ) ro ro @ (o (o (o (o (o ro ro (o ro tD (o (, !.1 .{ Fl Fl Fl F,4 .'{ -l i_l -l !-l Fl Fl Fl Fl .'l Fi .'{ d8 6 6 00(rub=***EEir.e,.,..Eg i!rxrEEE6EE- =3*=:rEE:::rE:qE=l*;EE**=*=*=i*5===o'9I9I E E E I I E E i E = J d e i i4 i e = i= iaeal I3 =H i H HHEr =9i = I< = = ii i i== = =l.{ (5 O Fr Fr Cr.r,n O.n O,n O,n,n.n r- ..r I r.. Z ..t O 6 N O i\l rn O Ln O O O O)<<l..16r-!-rNln<lr.l1 rn (O (O F. r\ aO (|t <l @O rO O Fr.r1 <lFOiFrrn<lsl('rO(n(od <i < < rn (o (o (o ro ro (o @ r0 (o @ @ (o rn (o o l,) (o (o (o ro ro ro r\ N F. r\ @ cn cD cnF i Fr !.r r-{ !-l F{ Fl Fl Fl -l !'l Fl Fr !'l fl r_l l\llr)rO(o(O(orOrO(D(o(O(o(o(o(o(o(ll(o E =-- =-, E = PgeE=Ei=i*s t i= =HP=;gi Z =EEE=E=EEEEEEEE=EEEE==EEIEEEfu E=i fi3EEia=frrI55es8=oz-:>u)= ,q 11-r--.t 6z =11 3;;tsiB38 8E=i922I= 5 oo>a) --!->>P>zz;z---->>=>qirtzl, l11l.l1l-m "":1 "33==zzzz \I {5{ OIPPC'\c.or(,r(ogrN(o(o OPPOc>>c1ZZ16-{-{6>**> --.<<=2u'uFEr)a)mm uJootlJoooroo(,vroooooPOOP5(nN)(Ooooo CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING PROPERTY TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The purpose of this ordinance is to rezone property to Planned Unit Development to allow for the construction of a single family home and an accessory dwelling unit with standards. A printed copy of Ordinance No. _____ is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Manager/Clerk. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION this 14th day of December, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-23 1601 lake lucy road (island)\summary ordinance.doc PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1601 LAKE LUCY ROAD FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTIAL (LOW DENSITY). Weick: With that I will turn it over to Sharmeen. Thank you, Sharmeen. Al-Jaff: Chairman and members of the Planning Commission, the application before you is a request to rezone from rural residential to planned unit development. Briefly, the site is located south of Lake Lucy Road. It is surrounded by Lake Lucy in its entirety. The site has an area of approximately 9.03 acres. It is currently zoned rural residential. Access to the site is gained via Lake Lucy Road. The 2040 Land Use Plan guides the subject site for low density residential. Within a low density you can have 1.2 units per acre but no more than 4 units per acres. This category can be either zoned into single-family residential, R-4 which is a mix of low density, residential low and medium density, or planned unit development-residential. Rezoning this property into any of those categories would allow the site to be consistent with the 2040 Land Use Plan. Brief background. Back in 1993 the owners of the island at the time came in for a wetland alteration permit for the purpose of constructing a bridge and a driveway to access the driveway. There were multiple extensions granted to this. The work was completed on the bridge as well as the driveway in 1999. Some of the things that have taken place that we also need to point out is that since 2018 staff has been working with the applicant very closely. This site is truly unique. It is the only island that has building rights within the City of Chanhassen. The applicant’s goal is to build a single-family home for their family and an accessory dwelling unit for his mother. The site contains bluffs and wetlands. It is located within the shoreland overlay district of Lake Lucy and it has 100% tree canopy cover. The access driveway off of Lake Lucy Road connects the island to Lake Lucy Road via a bridge. The length of this driveway is approximately 1,600 feet and this is just the distance between Lake Lucy Road and the bridge right here. Looking at the different options, we know that this is a lot of record, it is entitled to the building of a single-family home. The applicant’s request was to have a principle structure with an accessory dwelling unit. This can either be achieved via subdivision or rezoning the site to planned unit development. We looked at the impact of subdividing the site versus rezoning it to planned unit development. With a subdivision, you will be able to accomplish the additional home; however, you will have to widen the driveway to 20 feet. There is additional grading, tree removal, hard surface, potential for two additional home sites rather than the two that the applicant is requesting. Also, there is more potential for grading with the extension of public utilities. Through a planned unit development, the applicant would be able to use the existing driveway. There is a septic system that is proposed on the site as well as a well. We are able through the planned unit development regulations to cap the size of the accessory dwelling unit. We can require the use of a single internal driveway and the planned unit development governing the site would establish additional limitations on the site. The applicant selected to move forward with a planned unit development approach. With that, staff directed the applicant to put together a concept, bring it before the city to allow us to evaluate the request, and bring it before you. It is important that we point out this is a concept. It was intended to give us an idea of what it is the Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 owner of the property’s intentions were and how to write proper ordinances that address concerns, improve potential development of the site, add regulations and improve the quality of development. Some of the things that we’re able to accomplish is that the total permitted site coverage is 20%. What the applicant is proposing is going to be below 15%, 14.5% with this concept. We sent this concept to multiple agencies including the watershed, the DNR, and staff at the city, and there was one reoccurring theme that was pointed out by the different agencies and different staff members and that had to do with the amount of grading and what can be done to reduce the grading. So we had a discussion with the property owner and the initial proposal basically looked at serving the main home via one driveway. At the southern portion of the island the driveway would split to serve the accessory dwelling unit. We recommended that the applicant unify those driveways and share access, basically eliminating everything that you see in the hatched red and the applicant can talk about that further but he did agree to this request and understood that this was a concern to many different departments and different staff members. What some of the other elements that this planned unit development will regulate is the fact that you can have one single-family home and one accessory dwelling unit. The ownership of those two homes; they cannot be sold separately. These will remain under single ownership. There is no short-term lease and with short term we are defining it as less than three months. We are limiting the size of the accessory dwelling unit. There are measures in place to ensure fire prevention. We are requesting that the driveways be combined. The applicant was directed to continue working with staff to promote preservation of natural features of the site. We are limiting the size of the accessory structures which also include water-oriented structures for the island. We are also regulating dock rights within this development. Staff is recommending approval of this application of this request because I had mentioned earlier, yes it can be subdivided but this is a mechanism for the city to regulate the future development of this site. This is the type of development when basically a one-size-fits-all ordinance was difficult to implement on a parcel such as this one. We are recommending approval with comments in the staff report and as an adoption of the attached ordinance. One thing I do need to point out is that staff received three emails in addition to the emails included in your staff report. They were from Gregory Fast, Kathryn Randall (also goes by Betsy), and Kim and Tom McReavy. The emails basically included comments requesting minimizing grading, concerns with potential light pollution on the island, impact to surrounding habitat. Other comments involved support of the project, commending the applicant for removing buckthorn from the island. With that, we will make sure that these are incorporated as part of the public record when this items appears before the city council. I’ll be happy to answer any questions. Weick: Great. Thank you. I will open it up for commissioners to ask questions. McGonagill: I have the same questions I had before on the previous item and it’s about fire. They’re going to have a well and other fire suppression sprinklers inside the structures? Al-Jaff: Correct. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 McGonagill: So there’s not a hydrant or anything down there? There’s no sewage down there? They have their own septic system? Al-Jaff: Correct. And there was a rather lengthy meeting that took place between the fire chief and the applicant. They walked the site and they agreed upon a consultant that specializes in fire suppression. The applicant would be able to speak to this matter further. McGonagill: In the conversations with the fire chief is it his intention, as I just sit here looking at the bridge, will the bridge take a fire truck? Al-Jaff: Yes, actually it would. McGonagill: So they could get equipment down there. Al-Jaff: Correct. So what we are waiting for is official certification that the bridge will be able to handle the truck. Preliminary investigations tell us that yes, it will be able to handle it. McGonagill: Under the conditions of the PUD can you put in a requirement that the bridge always be able to handle a truck? Bridges age. To meet that. I don’t know if there is a code for that but I just want the ability to get an ambulance down there. At least to get one small piece of equipment in there. If there was an emergency, that’s whose going to respond and I don’t want to see the fire truck go blasting down through there no knowing if the bridge won’t take it and it ends up in the lake. Aanenson: I’m not sure you mentioned this Sharmeen but the house will be fire sprinkled. McGonagill: Yes, she said that. But they respond. Like a 9-1-1 call, somebody calls and has a heart attack or something and the fire guys, they respond. What I’m looking for is can in the PUD you put requirements similar to commercial bridges. That it’s maintained at a certain standard to allow fire equipment access. Al-Jaff: Specifically from a safety standpoint and emergency management, that will be the intent. Staff will check with the city attorney to ensure that…It is staff’s intent to ensure that this requirement is part of the planned unit development. We will check with legal counsel. McGonagill: The second question is similar to that. Is access for other commercial vehicles, garbage trucks, etc., they will have the same? Aanenson: Can I just clarify that, too? I think oftentimes in situations like that you have to bring your garbage up to the street. That’s actually a private driveway so typically you take your trash up to the end of the driveway, but we can clarify that. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 McGonagill: Okay. Very good. Because it’s, I just think about natural activities, landscaping, and construction. People are going to always be doing something down there. There’s going to be a weight requirement on that bridge? Aanenson: Yes, when they are constructing the house for sure. McGonagill: For sure and then as you go down the road it will be there too. I just want to ensure that it’s maintained safely. I realize it’s a private drive. It’s not our responsibility. But with a PUD it is. I mean we could put that in the PUD if that’s the way we want it to be done and just ensure that it’s safe. Okay. That’s all the questions I have. Weick: Great. Thank you. Other questions? Noyes: I have a little bit of a follow up question to kind of the previous one and it’s related to that private road and the maintenance of it. I would imagine the property owner is responsible for the plowing of that road in the winter? The plowing of the snow? Are there any restrictions related to use of road chemicals on that road given that this is a bridge over a lake. Al-Jaff: So back in 1993 when the wetland alteration permit was approved for the construction of the driveway one of the conditions was limiting chemicals used on the driveway. Noyes: Thank you. Skistad: I’m going to assume that flooding is not really an issue. It is an issue? Al-Jaff: It is…the island sits over 30 feet above the ordinary high water mark of Lake Lucy so it’s fine. It will be okay. Skistad: Okay. The other question I had was the accessory dwelling unit. It says it has a maximum of two bedrooms and it may not exceed 1600 square feet. I’m just wondering why we are limiting it to two bedrooms because like a typical apartment would be 1200 to 1300 square feet for a three-bedroom and this would be 1600 so it seems like…I was just curious about that. Why we would be limiting it specifically to two bedrooms with 1600 feet? Al-Jaff: So the 1600 feet was requested by the applicant. Number of bedrooms within the structure, a couple of things came into play. The first one was the capacity of the septic system that is proposed out there. This site will take in the sewage from the main house as well as the accessory dwelling unit. The intent is to provide a place for mom to live as well as a potential caregiver. So these are the two reasons why we limited the number of bedrooms, directly relating to the septic system that’s going to serve this site. Also, we needed to ensure that this was not a full-fledged detached single-family home but rather truly an accessory dwelling unit and it was reasonable to limit the size. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 Skistad: Thank you. McGonagill: Follow up on Commissioner Skistad’s septic system question, has any sort of percolating test been done on the island to know if the septic system will work out there? Aanenson: Just a second. Can you make sure you are speaking into your microphone? McGonagill: Sure. I’m sorry. I’ll just repeat the question. Follow up on Commissioner Skistad’s question on the septic system. Has any sort of percolating test been done on the island to give a high degree of certainty that a septic system will work and not effluent go into the lake? Aanenson: The Building Official looked at that, just cursory soil types, and they believe there is a couple different types of systems but they are confident that one of those would work. McGonagill: Okay. Thank you. Von Oven: We’ve been very specific about this accessory dwelling unit so as not to make it a sellable total home. I guess, given my unfamiliarity with those things, is there anything about an accessory dwelling unit that makes it less safe than the requirements on a normal single-family home? Aanenson: No. It would still have to go through the building permit process. Be inspected like a regular one. Again, the goal was, there’s no limit to the square footage of a home so you can have one large home. In this circumstance they have identified a home and want to have an ancillary one instead of saying you are going to get two lots. We want to cap those so it doesn’t become two separate lots as Ms. Al-Jaff indicated. But it has to go through the same rigorous. It would have to meet as Sharmeen indicated there would have to be sewer and water which would be through the well and septic and in addition, all of the building codes. Von Oven: I understand that it was the request of the applicant to make that accessory dwelling unit a maximum of 1600 feet. I’m still confused on the max of two bedrooms. Sharmeen, I know you said part of the reason for this was to ensure that it doesn’t turn into a single-family home. Given that that’s covered in other areas, I’m going to make the assumption that the actual single- family home to be built can has as many bedrooms as it wants, right? Al-Jaff: That’s correct. As long as the number of bedrooms can be served via public or private utilities. Von Oven: Okay. I guess then my question ends up being this: Between these two structures, is there a maximum number of bedrooms that the proposed sewage system will be able to handle, and is that governed through some sort of inspection process? Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 Aanenson: Correct. It is. They have to demonstrate that and it’s actually based on bedroom space to your septic and well. Let’s just go back to the two separate dwellings again. If you have enough to make it two complete homes then you have different traffic patterns, different use of the property. So when it’s intended to be ancillary and regulated by the homeowner, it’s a different feel than two separate homes with cars coming and going, two sets of trash being hauled up to the end of the driveway, that sort of thing. We are looking, it says one structure with something ancillary that is related to that principal structure. Von Oven: Thank you. Skistad: I guess I’m just going to ask a future question then. So if, let’s say that someone in the future, a new person has purchased the property. Perhaps they will probably have to install a new septic system so they won’t be able to increase the bedroom. The land won’t be able to have a three-bedroom instead of a two-bedroom unit unless they come back to us and ask for a variance? Aanenson: Yes. Or amend the PUD. Typically, if you add additional bedrooms, you have to demonstrate that you have sewer capacity. Could they oversize it to begin with? That’s potential. I’m not sure. That is something that would have to be looked at at the time when they are putting together the system. Any changes to the plan as laid out would have to come back. Any modifications, which would have to come back as a PUD amendment. That’s why the PUD was put together. To regulate all that’s being used. Skistad: I understand what you are doing. I understand what you are saying, but let’s say that they have an office and it just naturally becomes a bedroom at some point. I don’t know if there is a better way to write that. Because the goal is to just make sure obviously that we don’t overcome the sewage capacity because we don’t obviously want to spill anything into Lake Lucy. Weick: There is a septic field sizing attachment which is really long actually. They specify, and there’s two different options. They specify seven bedrooms and then they sort of explain how they can. It really comes down to the bedrooms. They explain how they can appropriately fit one or two mounds or septic systems to support the seven bedrooms where they can build one for the main house and one for the accessory structure. But there’s only so much space to be able to have the runout fields and all that kind of stuff. I think what they are saying is it sounds like they want that primary structure to be five bedrooms and honestly, I think all that’s left is just size. Aanenson: Capacity. Weick: Thank you. That’s a better word. Capacity. Is two bedroom. I think they are fully limited by septic and nothing else. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 Aanenson: So if one of the bedrooms in the accessory building was being used as an office, that’s fine. It wouldn’t affect. Weick: Right. Skistad: Okay. Weick: Great. These are great questions. It’s awesome. It’s really important. Reeder: Under normal regulations, is it possible for this accessory dwelling unit to be rented out or would that be illegal? How would be control that? Al-Jaff: They can rent it out but it cannot be a short-term lease. It has to be three months or more. Reeder: So we essentially have two residences on one lot? Al-Jaff: Correct. Which is permitted under a planned unit development. Aanenson: It was proposed, it was originally intended to be an accessory structure for a grandparent. Could it be used for something else? We always as planners try to anticipate something in the future. So if you’re doing a weekly rental, you have a different capacity whether there is two bedrooms. How it’s being used is different that someone who might rent it for the summer or something like that. That’s how we looked at that it. Looking at having a three-month as opposed to renting it out by the week. Reeder: So there’s no requirement that the accessory building, the person that lives in that building, be related to the main building? It can be anybody? It seems like we had one of these accessory buildings I think about two years ago that we approved and I can’t remember what the requirements were. Aanenson: Right now we have a variance requirement that you can finish your basement off and have someone living with you but that has to be related to you. It’s a different requirement. It is certainly a requirement that you could put on this property. That’s certainly under the PUD. You could say that the person living there has to be related. That’s an option. We gave a different option. Reeder: What is the intent of the proposed property owner? Aanenson: I would have to ask the applicant to speak to that. Skistad: I’m just going to look at this from a lease perspective again. I’m just going to assume that, let’s just say it sold and they want to lease this secondary area. I’m going to assume that you Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 could do a typical lease which runs 12 months and then possibly it turns into a month-to-month lease but that wouldn’t cause any problems here because they would have met the minimum. Aanenson: Yes. Skistad: Okay. Weick: Great. More thoughts or questions on this one for Sharmeen? Just holler if I’m rushing you as commission members. If you need some more time to read or think, just holler at me. I don’t want to push anybody. Von Oven: Hey, Commissioner Weick! Weick: Yes. Von Oven: I’m hollering at you. I’ve been sitting here trying to figure out how to ask this question so it’s not going to come out right. At the very beginning, Commissioner McGonagill talked about the bridge and it was very clear to me that an existing bullet, there is not an existing bullet in the PUD that says, “Hey, this bridge has to be safe.” So I think my question is more procedural. For us as a Planning Commission tonight, moving forward with this. If there are those of us who would like to see a bullet point in that PUD, is that be an amendment possibly? Is that a motion? Is that something that can be done after the fact? How does that work? Aanenson: I would recommend that you make it, if someone wanted that in the conditions, that you make that an amendment to the motion, that that be added. Von Oven: Okay. McGonagill: Following up to his question procedurally, does that happen after the first motion or can you make an amendment before then? Aanenson: You can make it as part of your original motion. Weick: As part of the motion. Aanenson: So what we’re checking on is the legality. It is a lot of record so they could build on that lot without going through this process and you would have the same jurisdiction. But we’ll follow up on that and have that answer if you want to amend that motion and get that clarified when it goes up to city council. McGonagill: Very good. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 Von Oven: Got it. Okay, sorry. I’m going to repeat what you just said to make sure I understood it. If the applicant was just going to build a single-family home, they could just do that in its current state? Aanenson: Yes. Von Oven: The reason why our concerns about the bridge holding an ambulance could be met is because they are asking for this variance. I’m sorry, this rezoning, in which case we have the ability to amend what is being proposed right now as the PUD? Aanenson: That is correct. Von Oven: I think I’m getting this thing down. Thank you. Weick: You’re killing it. But a motion is premature at this point because we have not heard from the applicant or the public hearing. So unless there are other… I will move at this point to, and we certainly have an opportunity to follow up with staff as questions come up. I would invite the applicant if they are on the Zoom call to make any comments or a presentation. Wicka: I am and thank you very much. Weick: Welcome! Wicka: Thank you. And thank you to all the members of the Planning Commission for considering this rezoning request. My name is John Wicka. I live at 2547 Bridle Creek Trail in Chanhassen with my wife and five daughters. We’ve been, I don’t know if this qualifies, in Chanhassen as long-time residents but we’ve been here is this house for 17 years. At least we’re not newcomers. I thank you for the opportunity to speak to you all and offer you a little additional information and commentary for your consideration as you consider this rezoning request. The first time my wife and I experienced the island was in June of 2018, just over two years ago and it was just recently put up for sale by Al and Mary Weingart who live on the adjacent property and still do. It was their dream to build a home out on the island. They’re the ones that oversaw the building of the bridge so I’ll come back around and talk more about that and I will be happy to answer any questions pertaining to the bridge. I understand there is a lot of concern in and around that. When we first experienced the island in June of 2018 I think our first reaction was I guess we couldn’t believe it was available. It’s sizeable. It has some acreage to it. It’s unique. It’s an island but it’s even better than an island. It’s an island with a pre-existing, very capable bridge that is intended to support fire trucks and construction trucks and so forth. It was really an ideal find for us. If you’ve had a chance to consider the topography map there, the top graphic map, it’s very interesting topography. It’s flat around many of the edges but it has this elevation in the center of the island and there are bluffs there. There are bluff setbacks there. There are wetland setbacks so there is a lot of dynamic things happening on the island but it is indisputably breathtakingly beautiful. We were excited about the opportunity because of the size Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 of the property and it had been our desire for several years to build a home for my mother who is now 86 years old near us. My dad died 21 years ago so this has been kind of something that we’ve been thinking of considering and planning for some time now. My mother is fiercely independent but she is 86 years old. She now really relishes or welcomes or is excited about the opportunity to maintain her independence but still have us just a moment’s notice away. So this was one of the big motivations for us to purchase the island because we thought it gave us the elbow room, if you will, to build a separate structure for her. Just two months later we purchased the island and at that time the first order of business was to eradicate the buckthorn. I think about it as kind of freeing the island because the buckthorn had a choke hold on the island. I think it was a neighbor’s comment that Sharmeen referenced a few moments ago that they were glad that we took out the buckthorn. I worked with Jill Sinclair. Walked the island with her over two years ago. She made some recommendations on some experts that could remove the buckthorn and treat it. It transformed the island back to its natural state. So it was very important for us to get the balance back to the island, and it doesn’t surprise me that the neighbors were in favor or positively affected by that because they all look at the island. It makes the view of the island so much more interesting because you get depth. It looked like an overgrown bush. You couldn’t see into it. You couldn’t penetrate it. Frankly, when you were on the island you couldn’t see the water from the interior of the island. So that was important to us. I don’t know what your experience is with buckthorn but I didn’t realize they grew into trees. Sizeable, 14-inch diameter type size trees. So it was not a small undertaking. At the same time in August of 2018 when we undertook the eradication of the buckthorn, we ran off full speed with an architect to build our dream home and with an attached, if you will, living structure for my mother. We intended to do that via connecting it by a skyway or a tunnel so that we met all of the city requirements. But, the things that make the island beautiful and unique and magical also make it a very challenging piece of property to build on. Again, there are bluffs. There are bluff setbacks. There are wetland setbacks. There was only one sensible place to put the septic system. There is a lot of elevation in the interior of the island so getting the grading right to get up that high is tricky business. Sadly, about five months later after spending a fair amount of money in architectural fees, we bagged it. We were demoralized. We couldn’t get it right. It was like putting together a puzzle and we couldn’t seem to kind of crack the code to make it work, so we stopped. We let several months go by. I did reach out to city staff and I had all sorts’ questions about variances and every time we turned around we hit another complication and we just couldn’t get it to work. But after kind of a cooling off period we took a second attempt at it but we stopped again because it just was overwhelming. It was an emotionally overwhelming, and I know you may be thinking how can it be so hard when there is that much space to work with? But again, all of the complexities layered on top of each other make it a very challenging task. So I circled back with city staff another time looking for more out-of-the-box solutions, if you will, and that’s when I discovered that single-family residential was an option. So, we started looking at that and we realized that that was a really big undertaking. As Sharmeen, the road coming down that services the island from Lake Lucy Road would have to be widened considerably. There were, I think, nine or more agencies that were involved in the original construction of the road and bridge in 1998-1999 and so to bring sewer and water down, the only way we could get our head around that would be to involve a developer and go through the whole subdividing of the island and that’s not what we Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 had in mind for the island. We were enamored with natural beauty of it and this felt like we would have to get very creative and create lots and the size of the roads and the cul-de-sacs and the infrastructure just made this a very undesirable option. That led us to the option to consider the PUD which, the way I understand it, is it provides some flexibility in creating exceptions that we are talking about here today but also requires, if you will, something in return, meeting the higher standards, sprinklers, or the turnarounds for the fire trucks, the higher building standards. We intend to build a green, being environmentally green with solar and geothermal and high building standards, and high-quality windows, and recapturing rainwater for reuse, that type of thing. So we intend to meet the higher standards in the conditions put upon the PUD request. This seemed to be a much more sensible solution, not only for what we were trying to accomplish, but really for all parties involved. The impact on the island is much lower than going for single-family residential. It’s better for the community, for the neighborhood, for the island, and so it seemed to be much more sensible and while I suppose the single-family residential is an option, it’s not a very good option. We would like to preserve the integrity of the island, not only now but into the future and we think this is a way to do that. I only have a few more comments if you can bear with me for just a few more moments. I did have a chance to meet with the city and county experts on some of the challenges that the island offers. I was able to walk the island with Fire Chief Don Johnson… (coughing). I just got over COVID so pardon the cough here. Weick: Thanks. Wicka: I’m in the clear now but I can tell it is still affecting my throat. I was able to walk the island with Fire Chief Don Johnson and he understandably had some concerns, some of them that you stated. That’s why we had gone through, I went back to the bridge builder and designers and it is and always was designed to carry not only construction trucks, but emergency vehicles and fire trucks. I’ll come back and be happy to answer questions about that. We also incorporated turnarounds for the fire trucks. I heard some of that commentary and concerns in the previous PUD that you were discussing. So we have accounted for that. I also was able to have a Zoom meeting with Terry Jeffery, Watershed Planning Manager with Bluff Creek. I also learned quite a lot in my conversation with Terry and was very pleased because I know this is high on everybody’s list, keeping the integrity of the water and the cleanliness of the lake. That’s certainly a concern of ours. I was very pleased in that conversation with Terry. He was very matter of fact. He knew exactly which five concerns he had that we needed to meet and we went through them together. I won’t put words in his mouth because I’m sure he’s commented on his own, but by the end of the conversation I think we, I think I can say both agreed that the island actually handled all of these requirements very well, actually. We didn’t have any concerns there. I’ll trust that he gave his own report and that it’s consistent with what I’m saying. The driveway, the purpose for that driveway that runs further to the south that forks off was to service the accessory dwelling unit. The reason for that, and I have a little bit of heartburn giving that up I’ll be honest with you, but I’m willing to make that a condition is because it’s flat. If you can see those topographic lines there it doesn’t climb the elevated area of the island. It runs along the south side and is largely flat. That was intended to make it easier for my aging mother to be able to go out and walk and get outside, frankly, and enjoy the island. But, as I said, we have agreed Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 to make it a condition. There were multiple comments on that assuming that’s still desirable we have agreed to have the one driveway service both dwelling units. My final comment is I did initiate some outreach to the Lake Lucy Homeowners Association and that consisted of all lot owners on Lake Lucy and they are the ones most impacted by any development that we do on the island, whatsoever. So I did initiate some outreach there. Because of COVID we weren’t able to organize any in-person meeting, but I did encourage them all to bring any questions or concerns with me. I did hear from three of the parties. I was able to answer their questions. Most of them were curiosities and clarification. I believe I have all of their support, at least I’m not aware of anyone that doesn’t support it. I was able to provide them with clearer maps than were available on the city website so they could get a better understand of what we were after. So, I feel pretty good about engaging the neighborhood and as I said I heard from some of them but I think it was all positive interaction and I hope and I believe that I have their support. Again, I would like to thank you all for your consideration here and I’m happy to take any questions you might have. Weick: Wow. Thank you so much. That offers a lot of color and clarity on what you’re trying to do and thank you for hanging in there with your cough and giving us that. That’s really helpful. I will open it up though. I know there were several questions that commission members had raised that I know would have been properly answered by you. I don’t know if those have already been answered but we’ll open it up to the commission members to either ask follow ups on those questions or ask new questions. McGonagill: Thank you for a very good presentation and walking us through this. You walked with the Fire Chief so I would assume, talk to us about the bridge that there is a certain design standard the bridge has been designed to and it was for construction equipment and for fire equipment and it is your intention to maintain that standard in the bridge going forward? Wicka: Yes it is Commissioner and thank you for the opportunity to come back around and address the concerns around the bridge. Fire Chief Johnson was, we had quite a lot of back and forth via email after our meeting and he was able to provide me with the specifications on the two, I believe they are the two largest trucks, but they are also the two primary trucks that would service the island in case of a fire. I did share that with the company that built the bridge. They went to their engineers and shared with me that the bridge was designed and built to support trucks of that size. That answers I think the question in terms of when it was originally built. I think your question is a fair one in terms of ongoing upkeep and maintenance and as long as it’s a reasonable interval so that, because I am sure there are cost implications that come with this, but as long as there is a reasonable interval to recertify it with an engineering firm that it is still capable or operating as designed, still capable of supporting those trucks, I would be happy to incorporate that. McGonagill: Thank you. I appreciate that because just like you I’ve got some elderly parents and when I call emergency services I want them to be able to get to them, and it’s very true to you, too. On the design, one of the questions I have for you is, I didn’t see it. I may have missed it Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 because I just probably missed it. There’s a two-story guest house and there is also an accessory structure at the end of the first driveway. Is that a garage? Wicka: I think it’s ultimately going to be a multi-purpose structure. It’s put there because as someone was pointing out earlier we’re going to be responsible for a lot of private driveway here. So I’m envisioning a plow in there and probably other utility-type tools and needs for the island. We put it there so it was kind of closer to the access point of the island and also a little bit out of the way although we intend to design it such that it’s equally attractive to the rest of the structures on the island. McGonagill: Thank you. That’s all I had Mr. Chairman. Weick: Great. Thank you. Any other questions for our applicant? Skistad: I don’t have a question I just have a, I guess a statement. My goal, my questions about the limitations of the bedrooms was just to make sure we weren’t putting a limitation over the property unnecessarily. That was the only goal with that. I think it sounds like a great project so I’m for it so that was the reason for reason for those questions. Weick: Great. Thank you. Wicka: And thank you Commissioner for that thought. I appreciate it. When it was suggested that it be limited we were agreeable to it because as previously stated the concept is just a space for my mother and perhaps a caregiver. So thank you. Aanenson: Mr. Chair, if you want to open the public hearing. Weick: I will. I was just giving people a second in case they wanted to speak. I always feel like I’m talking over somebody. Thank you Commission members and thank you for, again, a really thorough and honest appraisal of how you are going to use that beautiful piece of property so thank you very much for joining us. At this time I will open the public hearing portion. If anyone would like to come forward and speak and opinion on this matter may do so now. Sharmeen, you already. I might be mixing my cases but I think you already summarized the emails for us, right? Al-Jaff: I did. Weick: Yes. Thank you. And those will be in the record and the telephone number has been up on the screen for a little bit. Would you like to? Yeah, absolutely. So we have someone joining us here in chambers. Again, as you’ve heard, just please speak very loudly into the microphone. Frerichs: Thank you very much. I’m Roger Frerichs and we are neighbors on Lakeway Drive, the street right over next to it. I didn’t come here with any particular speech in mind but I came with less knowledge and so after hearing the discussion of the owner, it sounds like he’s trying to Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 maintain the beauty that that island has and that’s why I think it should be something that we should favor. Weick: Thank you so much. I’m happy to agree. I do think it’sa , considering the alternatives, I think it’s certainly a good use. Any phone calls? Al-Jaff: I haven’t heard so far. None. Weick: None. With that and with no one else here in chambers I will close the public hearing portion of tonight’s matter and open to commissioner comment, discussion, and motion. And I pre-empted a little bit there. It is getting late, I have to admit and I’m maybe getting a little dreary. I offered my opinion there a little bit too soon but I am certainly in favor of this PUD. I imagine that if there is concern from neighbors or public like myself, I was envisioning a typical development that we look at where they come in and they grade it down, they clear out the trees, they build four houses and four docks. You know what I mean? That option I think would be disappointing at least to me and I imagine for some of the local residents as well. I would imagine once seeing and hearing these plans it puts to rest those concerns of dramatically changing the view of that island which I just don’t think will happen. I am certainly strongly in favor of the PUD in this instance, and if things want to be added to it, we can certainly do that as part of the motion. McGonagill: Mr. Chairman, I agree with you to stick with the other, just to the small amendment we talked about on the bridge just for emergency access. I’m also there with you because, let’s face it. This is privately owned. It’s property that someone has owned and purposed. They have the constitutional right to develop it and they worked through the process and I think it’s about as nice as one could imagine if he carries out the plans that he’s talking about it would be great. So, yes I think it’s a good use of the property for a very unusual one. Weick: Yeah. Sure. McGonagill: It will add a lot to look of the lake in many ways. But I will be proposing the, some amendment on the, just so the bridge remains within a certain level of usability by fire, by emergency equipment. I’ll say it that way. And I’ll let staff sort out what it needs to look like. Weick: Fair enough. How do the rest of you feel? Von Oven: And therein lies the experience of Commissioner McGonagill because I’m sitting here racking my brain trying to figure out how we amend this thing on the fly and get that all in and he knows he can just rely on staff to do that. I’m in the same boat. It’s funny. One, what a fantastic project both from the standpoint of I’m super jealous of what you are doing. This is beautiful and what a great project. Two, it’s probably the first project that’s come through where as a commissioner I have zero fear of us setting some sort of a precedent here because we’re never going to see another property like this so, variance away here. It’s great. The third part is Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 that I’m not at all worried about the applicant and his any lack of letting that bridge deteriorate. He will have every reason in the world to ensure that emergency personnel can access that property. The reason that I will support, however Commissioner McGonagill gets this done, is for the next owner. For that owner down the road who might be renting the property out, which I am also in favor of for long term and I’m glad that provision was put it there, to just ensure that we don’t end up with a situation many, many years from now where someone is renting out the property to someone else and they’re letting the bridge deteriorate. I do not want to put any undue burden on Mr. Wicka for yearly engineering reviews of the bridge. I just don’t know how that works. But finding a way where we ensure that for the long term that very unique structure maintains safety standards without putting the undue burden on Mr. Wicka is what I would be in favor of. McGonagill: I support you in that regard. Five daughters, he’ll have 15 grandchildren pretty soon and he will want emergency personnel in there. Weick: Great. Those are great thoughts and great viewpoints. Go ahead. McGonagill: Are you ready for a recommendation? Weick: Sure. McGonagill moved, Skistad seconded for the Planning Commission to recommend approval of rezoning of the property located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road with an approximate area of 9.03 acres from Rural Residential to Planned Unit Development-Residential incorporating the attached standards and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision recommendation, including an amendment that staff will work with the property owner to develop appropriate safety standards for the continued maintenance of the bridge. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Approve Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications for The Park 3rd Addition Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No: Planning Case No. 201901 PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council approves The Park 3rd Addition Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications”. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The applicant, Lennar, is requesting approval of the plat for The Park 3rd Addition subdivision. The Park 3rd Addition will create 31 lots and rightofway for public streets for the property. BACKGROUND On March 11, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: The Rezoning of 191 acres from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development Residential, PUDR; including the PUD ordinance 'Galpin Design Standards'; The Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts subject to conditions in the staff report; and The Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating 169 lots, three outlots and dedication of public rightofway as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated February 28, 2019, to be modified to match the site plan presented on March 11, 2019, with the reduction of four lots,subject to the following conditions: Stated in the Conditions of Approval section. On Monday, August 12, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for The Park which included 50 lots and the dedication of 50 acres of public park. On April 5, 2019, Lennar submitted a revised preliminary plat that was consistent with the Conditions of Approval of the March 11, 2019 City Council action. Those plans were modified on May 24, 2019. On July 7, 2019, the City Council reviewed the changes in the preliminary plat and approved a grading plan. The 8 stall parking lot has been relocated to the south side of the street from its current location. The approved PUD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectApprove Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications for The Park 3rdAdditionSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, CommunityDevelopment Director File No: Planning Case No. 201901PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council approves The Park 3rd Addition Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans andSpecifications”.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe applicant, Lennar, is requesting approval of the plat for The Park 3rd Addition subdivision. The Park 3rd Additionwill create 31 lots and rightofway for public streets for the property.BACKGROUNDOn March 11, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following:The Rezoning of 191 acres from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development Residential,PUDR; including the PUD ordinance 'Galpin Design Standards';The Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts subject to conditions in the staff report; andThe Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating 169 lots, three outlots and dedication of public rightofway asshown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated February 28, 2019, to be modified to match the siteplan presented on March 11, 2019, with the reduction of four lots,subject to the following conditions: Statedin the Conditions of Approval section.On Monday, August 12, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for The Park whichincluded 50 lots and the dedication of 50 acres of public park.On April 5, 2019, Lennar submitted a revised preliminary plat that was consistent with the Conditions of Approval of theMarch 11, 2019 City Council action. Those plans were modified on May 24, 2019. On July 7, 2019, the City Council reviewed the changes in the preliminary plat and approved a grading plan. The 8 stall parking lot has been relocated to the south side of the street from its current location. The approved PUD governs the standards for the development including the maximum of 31 Villa homes. On January 27, 2020, the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for The Park 2nd Addition subdivision, which included 57 lots, four outlots, and rightofway for public streets for the property. On September 14, 2020 the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for The Bluffs at Lake Lucy which created 31 lots, two outlots, and rightofway for public streets for the property. DISCUSSION The Park 3rd Addition is the last of the four plats for The Park PUD. All of the parkland has been dedicated with the previous three plats. The 31 lots have an average area size of 11,362 sf. (the minimum allowed is 8,450). RECOMMENDATION “The Chanhassen City Council approves The Park 3rd Addition Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications”. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Development Contract Development Review Application The Park 3rd Addition Final Plat Landscaping Plan Lot Compliance Table Street and Utilities Plan Sheets Grading and Erosion Control Plan Sheets CITY OF CIIANIIASSIN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO:Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager FROM:Kate Aanenson, AICP Community Developmenl Director Erik Henricksen, EIT, Project Engineer Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Coordinator Jerry Ruegemer, Park and Recreation Director DATE: December 14.2020 SUBJ:Approve the Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications for "The Park 3rd Addition" - Planning Case No. 2019-01 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat, Development Contract and Plans and Specifications". PROPOSAL SUMMARY The appticant, Lennar, is requesting approval of the plat for The Park 3d Addition suMivision. The Park 3'd Addition will create 31 loa and right-of-way for public streets for the property. BACKGROUND On March 11, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: The Rezoning of 191 acres from Rural Residential District, RR, to Planned Unit Development - Residential, PUD-R; including the PUD ordinance 'Galpin Design Standards'; The Subdivision Preliminary Plat creating 169 lots, three outlots and dedication ofpublic right- of-way as shown in plans prepared by Pioneer Engineering dated February 28, 2019, to be modified to match the site plan presented on March I l, 2019, with the reduction of four lots, subject to the following conditions: Stated in lhe Conditions of Approval section. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 a r The Wetland Alteration Permit of 1.28 acres of wetland impacts subject to conditions in the staff report; and 11OO I4ARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I4T.CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 2 On April 5, 2019, Lennar submitted a revised preliminary plat that was consistent with the Conditions of Approval of the March I1,2019 City Council action' Those plans were modified on May 24,2019. On July 7, 2019, the City Council reviewed the changes in the preliminary plat and approved a gradini pian. The 8*tali parking lot has been relocated to the south side ofthe street from its current i*utio"n. The approved PiJD govems the standards for the development including the maximum of 31 villa homes. On Monday, August 12, 2019, the City Council approved the final plat for The Park with included 50 lots and the dedication of 50 acres ofpublic park. On January 27,2020,the City Council approved the final plal for The Park 2d Addition suMivision, which inciuded 57 lots, four outlots, and right-of-way for public streets for the property. On September 14,2020lbe City Council approved the final plat for The Blufls at l,ake Lucy which created 3l lots, two outlots, and right-of-way for public sreee for the property' SUBDIVISION REVIEW The Park 3'd Addition t mE- 1 fl t" - I: l.; I \ I Ir "1 ',(r I The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 3 '2 .-.r* 2: 'ea -f;'^ ( ,., :.;t' ,"ili :s ib{ .c {: eI ; tt ;$ I I I I I r" Attached is a spreadsheet demonstrating that all lots meet the standards of the PUD. These lots have an average area size of 1'1j62 sf' (the minimum allowed is 8'450). REVIEW CONDITIONS PRELIMINARY APPROVAL Park and Recreation l. Dedication of 100+/- acres ofwooded open spaces and wetlands in the eastem halfofthe property to the city of chanhassen for parkland in exchange for a housing density transfer and hrmUme"t of a nine +/- acre parkland dedication requirement. Outlot A rvill was dedicated to the city. 2. Acknowledgement that the dedicated land may be developed at the city's discretion as parkland for public use and may include, but is not limited to trails, boardwalks, bridges, structures, and signage. *ill Occurred with the Development Contract for the lst phase' 3. The planning, engineering, grading, and placement of aggregate and bituminous base for construction of a l0-fooiwide bituminous east/west trail connection between Galpin Boulevard and \i / 7 5I .z' /i v ss* The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 4 a location east ofStreet "D", and in lieu of constructing a 10-foot wide bituminous trail adjacent to Galpin Boulevard between Street "E" and Street "A", make a $120,000 (1,600 feet @ $75 per foot) coniribution to the city's Trail Fund. Condition te-be was added to the Development Contract for The Park. 4. All 6ails shall meet all city standards for trail construction. Condition te$e was added to the Development Contract for The Park 5. The east/west trail shall maintain a minimum lO-foot setback from outside edges oftrail to private property and be designed to minimize encroachment of wetland buffers. Condition tebe was added to the Development Contract for The Park 6. The east/west trail crossing of Street "A" shall be relocated from a midblock crossing as shown to the intersection of Street "A" and Street "D". Plannine l. All 191 acres must be included in the PUD. Condition to be added to the Development Contract for The Park 2. Atl lots and homes must be developed consistent with the standards in the Compliance Table. Condition to be added to the Development Contract for The Park. 7. The east/west trail shall be designed and constructed so as not to require retaining walls. Condition tebc was added to the Development Contract for The Park 8. The entirety ofthe east/west trail and associated buffers shall be constructed within the dedicated public outlots. Condition te$e was added to the Development Contract for The Park g. The planning, engineering and construction ofthe 10-foot wide bituminous trails connecting both Street ,lZ" mdiopazDrive/Ridge Lane to the planned trail at the westem edge of Lake Lucy including trail "ase."nts. Condition ts-be was added to the Development Contract for The Park Engineering L Any requirements set by the MCES to work within the MCES's sewer and utility easement shall be addresied by the applicant. Condition does not apply for The Park Final Plat; Condition does apply for The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 2. An executed agreement between the developer and the MCES allowing work within the MCES's easement shall be provided to the city prior to the issuance of grading permits. Condition does not apply for The Park Final Plat; condition does apply for The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and has been met for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 3. The width ofthe public right-of-ways shall be called out on the final plat prior to acceptance and recording, this includes radii cul-de-sac bulbs. Condition has been met forThe Park Final plat and Thi park 2.d Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 5 4. Thirty-foot (30-foot) wide drainage and utility easements, for the purpose ofaccessing utilities and basins, shall be provided beween ffil-to Lots l2eandl*l abutting Public Streetg :Z:: prior to acceptance and recording. Condition has been 4g!![99! for clarity and has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 20d Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 5. zught-of-way dedication in conformance with the Carver County Development/Access Review Comments, subject to review and approval by the county and city prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition Final PIat. 6. Ongoing coordination with the county and city regarding future improvements to Galpin Boulevard. Also see Condition 25 20. Condition has been 4g!![9{ for clarity and still applies. 7. The developer shall locate on the existing condition survey all existing wells and septic fields. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat end The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3"d Addition Final Plat. 8. The developer shall abandon all existing wells and septic fields in accordance with all federal, state, and local regulatory agency standards, and obtain all necessary permits for said abandonments. Prior to commencement of abandonment activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city. Condition still applies. 9. Provide an updated existing conditions survey that illustrates the MCES sanitary and utility easements on parcels 25.0100400 and 25.7580040. Condition no longer applies' 10. The applicant shall submit a mass grading plan or a phased grading plan (as applicable) for review and approvat by the city prior to issuaneeef grading pemi+s. Condition has been modified for clarity "od hr. been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3"d Addition Final Plat. 11. proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the gading plans at the center ofthe proposed driveway ai the curb line for review prior to issuaneeef grading pemi+s. Condition has been g5!![9g! for clarity and has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2'd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 12. proposed spot elevations shall be shown on the grading plans at top of curb for review prior to issu€nee€f grading pernri+s. Condition has been 4!![9g! for clarity and has been met for The Park Final Plaiand The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3"d Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 13. Drainage arrows for all EOF routes shall be included on the grading plans prior to issuaneeef grading pe+mi+s. Condition has been gqq!![g{ for clarity and has been met for The Park Final il"t "ni still applies to The Park 2nd-Addition Final Plat and has been met and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 14. Grading within bluff setbacks is subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuanee ef grading pemi+s. Condition has been 4g!![9g! for ctarity. Condition does not apply for The paix rinai ptat or The Park 20d Addition Final Plat or The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 6 15. All existing buildings and structures within the city's Well House #3 property abutting Galpin Boulevard shall be included on the grading plans. Condition has been met for The Park Final plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 16. Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and grade ofthe improved and relocated access driveway to Well House #3 off Calpin Boulevard. Condition no longer applies. 17. Grading plans shall be updated to include the location and protection methodology ofthe sigrificant oak tree on the Well House #3 site. Condition does not apply for The Park Finel Plat or The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat or The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 18. The applicant shall submit revised grading plans and stormwater plans so that no storrnwater runoffflowsdirectlyontothepublictrail@.Conditionhas been 44q!![gg! due to updated plans and has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2'd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 19. An updated geotechnical report assessing slope stability immediately east ofLot I l0 abutting Street "A" shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issuance ofgrading permits. Condition no longer aPPlies. 20. Final grading plans, including pond locations, sizing and analysis, along with right-of-way dedications off Galpin Boulevard, shall conform to the future Galpin Boulevard reconstruction project. Cross reference of grading plans, profiles, and respective cross sections are to be provided it key locations such as intersections, ponds, or other special features required by the county and city for review prior to acceptance and recording of the final plat. Condition has been met for The Park Final Ptat and still applies for The Park 2nd Addition Final Ptat and does not apply for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 21. All retaining walls exceeding four (4) feet in height shall have plans and details prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect prior to issuance of building permits. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and does not apply for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 22. The retaining wall south oflots 108-11 I abutting Street "A" shall be adjusted to accommodate a I . 5 : 1 buffer from the bottom of the proposed stormwater line to the bottom of the proposed retaining wall foundation. Condition no longer applies. @Conditionisthesameas#l4andisnotnecessary. 24. All newly constructed streets and the extension ofany existing streets shall be public streets, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance ofthe public improvements by the City Council. Condition still aPPlies. 25. All newly constructed public streets shall be designed to meet the current standard specifications and detait plate for residential streets (Detail Plate #5200), unless otherwise directed by the City Engineer. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2id Addition and Final Plat The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 26. Any and all conditions associated with the alignment and configuration of "Della Drive" set by the Planning Commission or City Council shall be addressed by the applicant prior to acceptance The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 7 and recording of the final plat. Condition does not apply for The Park Final Plat or The Park 2od Addition Final PIat or The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 27. The developer shall provide a curb cut and access easement for parcel 25.0100400 onto Street "2". Condition no longer applies. 28. A water service lateral shall be stubbed off the "Della Drive" water main for the future connection ro parcel 25.0100400. Condition does not apply for The Park Final Plat or The Park 2od Addition Final Plat or The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. ieft A seolechnical ensineerine shall be on-site durins gr ns oDerations. If undwater is encountered durin ggradins. srades shall be ad iusted to maintain a three foot seDaration from the bottom fl elevation and to the recommendations o f the soil eng ineer on site. Changes to es shall be submitt the city for revlew an aooroval.Condition has been 4!i[9g! due to updated plans and still applies. 30. Sidewalks shall be extended along the cul-de-sacs located off S++eets:9-+Gi Lucy Ridee Lane and-iizr and shall be constructed in accordance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates for concrete sidewalks. Condition has been modified for clarity. Condition does not applyior The park Final plat or The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat or The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 3l . All curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city's Detail Plates #521 5-5215D. Condition still applies. 32. Intersection improvements to provide pedestrian access at the intersection ofGalpin Boulevard and stfe€+l+r Peail Drive shall be conslructed in accordance with MUTCD best management practices. Condition has been 4g!![9{ for clarity. Condition does not apply for The Park Final Plat; condition applies to The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat; condition does not apply for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 33. A detail ofthe proposed street lights shall be provided prior to the issuance ofbuilding permits. Condition still applies. 34. An enumerated list ofall street lights and their proposed locations shall be provided for review and approval prior to the recording of the final plat. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2d Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 35. Street lights within the lo shall be owned and maintained by the electric utilitv companv. be install ed at all intersections and at the end ofeach cul-de-sac subject to review and approval by the city and still applies. prior to issuance of building permits. Condition has been 4g!![99! for clarity 36. The site plan shall be updated to provide proposed street glades (centerline gradients). Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 37. All newly constructed water mains shall be public water mains, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance ofthe public improvements by the City Council. Condition still applies. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 8 38. Watermains located onW Della Drive. Pearl Dri ve. and Paisley Path shall be tied into the high-pressure zone located on Galpin Boulevard. Water main extensions on Topaz Drive and Lucy Ridge Lane shall be tied into the existing water main stubs (low-pressure zone). Condition has been 4!!figg! for clarity and still applied to The Park l't and The Park 2nd Final Plats; Condition does not apply for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 39. The water main located on S++eet-::Z: Della Drive shall be tied inlo the existi ng stub off Ruby Lane and a gate valve near the connection point shall be installed. The gate valve shall be closed to separate the pressure zones. Condition has been modified for clarity. Condition does not apply foi The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final PIat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat 40. The developer shall field veriff the location ofall water main taps to the existine public mains offGaloin Boulevard prior 10 @ comme ncement of anv utility construction and update the plans accordingly. Condition has been 4!!!99! for clarity and still applies to The Park l.r and The Park 2od Final Plats; condition does not apply for The Park 3rd Addition Final Plat. 41. The developer's contractor shall schedule a preconstruction meeting with Engineering and Public Works Utilities departments prior to the commencement of any work to the water main installation and tapping from Gal ulevard. Condition has been modified for claritv and still applies to The park l.t and The Park 2od Final Plats; Condition does not apply for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 42. Updated plans indicating the location ofall undergtound utilities on the east and west side of Galpin Boulevard, along with plans and profiles ofany utility crossings on the east and west side of Galpin Boulevard, shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the issnaaeeof$uilding pemrits commencement of any utility construction. Condition has been 4!!@! for clarity and still applies to The Park l.t and The Park 2nd Final Plats; condition does not apply for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 43. An agreement that lists the conditions and required improvements for the land swap between the developer and the city regarding Lot 163 and a portion of the Well House #3 site, shall be executed and recorded prior to the acceptance and recording ofthe final plat. Condition no longer applies. 44. All utility crossings ofpotable water and sanitary and/or storm mains will require l8 inches of vertical separation and l0 feet of horizontal separation. The developer shall submit construction plans with profiles and plan views ofthe utilities for review and approval prior to the-issuanee-ef Uuilaingpeffiits the commencement of anv utility construction' Condition has been 43!!!9g! for clarity and still applies. 45. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary sewer thal do not meet vertical separation requirements will require that the sanitary sewer main a1 that crossing be constructed of PVC C900 water main material. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating material type at these locations for review and approval of the city prior to issuaneeelbuilCingaemits the commenc applies. of anv utilitv constructi on . Condition has been modified for clarity and still The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 9 46. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating that pipe lengths of sanitary sewer mains are centered over potable water crossings. Condition has been met for The Park Final PIat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 47 . Water mains shall be constructed at a minimum of 7.5 feet below grade, or insulated' and constructed in conformance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates. Condition has been modified for clarity and still applies. 48. Cluster valves located around water main tees shall be installed at a minimum of five feet from the tees to the valves, where feasible. All valve locations and any other water main appurtenances shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Public Works departments prior to issuaaee-ef$uil4ingfffi*i+s the commencement of anv utilitv construction. Condition has been g!i[g{ for clarity and still applies. 49. All comments and conditions regarding fire appurtenances, spacing, and location set forth by the Fire department shall be addressed by the applicant. Condition still applies. 50. All newly constructed sewer mains shall be public sewer mains, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptun"e of the public improvements by the City Council. Condition still applies. 5l . A 30-foot utility easement shall be recorded over the existing public sewer line, within Outlot A located near the south-central area ofthe preliminary plat, prior to acceptance offinal plat. Condition no longer aPPlies. 52. All conditions set forth by the MCES for the direct connection and installation ofan access manhole to their trunk line shall be addressed by the applicant, and all permits required for the connection and installation of the manhole shall be obtained prior to the commencement of construction. Condition does not apply for The Park Final Plat or The Park 2ud Addition Final Plat or The Park 3rd Addition Final Plat. 53. The applicant shall ensure the city's sanitary sewer nomenclature is incorporated in the construction pians. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 54. Profile sheets for all public utilities, including sanitary sewer, shall be required for review and approval by the city Prio construction. Condition has r to issuaneeelhi.ldingpenni+s commenc of an utilit been g3!![9g! for clarity and has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 55. PVC sanitary sewer pipes that will be constructed at a burial depth of 0-16 feet shall be constructed ofpipe class SDR 35, burial depths of l6-26 feet shall be ofpipe class SDR 26, and buriat depths of greater than 26 feet shall be of pipe class C900. Condition still applies. 56. Inverts that have a 2O-inch or greater differential shall be supplied inside drops per city standards and be constructed per the city's Detail Plate No. 2104. Condition still applies. 57. No roadway connection shall be made to Topaz Drive. Condition does not apply for The Park Final Plat or The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. Engineerin s: New Conditions B ased on Review of The Park Prelim lnan,Plat Revisions The Park 3'd Addition Final PIat December 14,2020 Page 10 l. The developer shall underground all overhead utilities fiom the southern property line to the norrhem property line of the development per City Ordinance Sec. 18-78(12). A $364,400.00 cash escrow for the construction of this public improvement shall be fumished to the city prior to recording of final plat. If the public improvement is not completed by January 1, 2023 or upon commencement of the future Calpin Boulevard Improvement Project, whichever occurs first, the security will be used by the city for these improvements. Condition no longer applies. 2. Untreated or stormwater from lots not captured and routed to treatment facilities, particularly in backlots, require a conveyance system to be installed to route storrnwater to treatment basins. Additional condition does not apply to The Park Final Plat; Condition does apply to The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3"d Addition Final Plat. 3. No sump structures shall be installed in backyard pickups. Additional condition applies. 4. Access routes to storm basins shall have a slope no greater than 3:1. Additional condition does not appty to The Park Final Plat; condition does apply to The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 5. Access had from Galpin Boulevard to Outlot E shall be abandoned. Additional condition does not apply to The Park Final Plat or The Park 2nd Addition Final PIat or The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 6. All public sanitary sewer utilities and sanitary sewer services shall have tracer wire installed. Detail plates and specifications shall be provided to the developer to meet this requirement and shall be defined in the supplemental provision for The Park Utility and Street Construction Project Manual. Additional condition applies to The Park Final Plat, however this condition will be met for all future additions due to updated City Standard Specifications and Detail Plates (2020). 7. All public streets' base course shall utilize an asphalt binder grade of"C" in accordance with MnDOT asphalt grades (Table 2360-2), plates and cross-section details shall be updated accordingly Additional condition applies to The Park Final PIat, however this condifion will be met for all future additions due to updated City Standard Specifications and Detail Plates (2020). Engineerin New C onditions Based on Review of The Park Final Plat 1.Drivewaysshallbesetback@inesinaccordancesection 2O-1122 of City Ordinances. Condition has been modified for clarity; Condition still applies. 2. All driveways shall be located outside side lot drainage and utility easements. Condition still applies. 3. A $300 fee per light shall be collected with the development contract for electricity costs for the first year of operation. Condition still applies. 4. The developer shall coordinate with the Building Department and Public Works Utility Department to determine which homes shall be required to install pfiyalg pressure reducing valves prior to the issuance of building permits. Condition has been modified for clarity and still applies. The Park 3'd Addition Find Plat December 14,2020 Page I I 5. The contractor shall contact the city inspector for inspection ofall insulated pipe crossings. Condition still applies. E New Con ns Based on ien' of The 2nd Addition Fin al Plat I be in conformance with the 6. On Sheet 1.3, provide a separate, enlarged inset detail ofthe proposed connection to the 24" DIP water main a1 the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and Hunter Drive/"Paisley Path" that includes plan and profile views ofthe location ofall existing utilities. Include a note to coordinate this worli with the Public Works Utility Department and city inspector 48 hours prior to wet tap. Condition has been met. 7. On Sheet 1.5 of the sanitary sewer and water main plans: DIP tees for risers on "Purple Parkway" shall be updated to be c900 wyes; the 20' DIP stubbed out of MH 16-078 shall b€ PVC, also adi note to address proper pipe support (compaction) under influence zone ofpipe. Condition has been met. 8. For all storm sewer plans: any HDPE pipe shall be called-out as "N-l2" in accordance with city standard specifications. Condition still appties to The Park 2od Addition and has been met for The Park 3'd Addition. l. The final plat shall be updated to include Outlots C & D to be encumbered in their entirety by a drainage and utility easement. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 2. All plans, specifications, project manuals, and submittals shal most recent version of city Standard Specifications and Detail Plates l.c mn.us/436/S .S cifi Detail-Pla Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 3. On Sheet 3 ofthe Grading Plans: The emergency over flow for the low point near station 18+00 along Pearl Drive is routed between Lots 2 and 3, Block 6, the plans shall be updated to show swale between the lots to direct the EOF towards Basin 300. Condition does not apply to The Park 3rd Addition. 4. On Sheet 4: The emergency overflow locations for the low point near station 4+00 along Purple Parkway shall be illustrated on updated plans, currently it appears water would overflow between Lots j and 6, Block 4 on the northeast side ofthe road; grading is proposed on the city's property where well #3 is located, a temporary construction easement shall be executed prior to "o.r.r""."nt of grading operations; grading is proposed to impact a MCES utility easement, an executed agreem.ni *ith MCSS shall be secured and provided to the city prior to commencement of grading ofirations; the grades on the south side of Lot 2, Block 5 are 2:1 and shall be adjusted to iraintuin ilop.. no steeper than 3: L Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 5. On Sheet 5: An updated erosion control plan shall be submitted that meets the requirements ofSec. l9-145 of City Ordinances, no grading operations shall commence prior to review and approval ofthe updaied submittal. Condition does not appty to The Park 3'd Addition. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 12 6. On Sheet 7: In the "Grading Sequence" notes the minimum topsoil depth shall be adjusted to 6"; in the "General Notes" Item 3 shall be updated to state a copy ofthe grading and erosion control plans must be on site at all times; Item l0 shall add the requirement of topsoil (6" minimum) iequired for all permanent turf areas; Item 12 shall indicate the requirement ofa vacuum sweeper truck is required to clean tracking. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 7. The Utility & Street Construction Plans sheet numbers must be updated to reflect the proper sequencing ofsheets for clarity, e.g. Sheet l.l of28 does not have a Sheet 28 within the set. Condition does not apply to The Park 3"d Addition, 8. On Sheet 1.1 ofthe Utility & Street Construction Plans: Provide a separate, enlarged inset detail ofthe proposed connection to the 14" HDPE water main at the intersection of Galpin Boulevard and iongacres Drive/"Pearl Drive" that includes plan and profile views of the location of all existing utilities. The updated plan is required prior to the commencement of any construction activities in this location, pending review by the city. The newly installed 8" C900 water main shall be installed with a casing pipe with no bends, any conflicting utilities shall be lowered' Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. g. On Sheet LI: An air release valve and manhole shall be located near the high point ofthe water main, pending revisions from Condition 8 (above); construction note 5 shall indicate "l" I.P.S. PE"; the gate valve located near station 5+15 along "Pearl Drive" over the sanitary main shall be offset 5' io the east; the irrigation service stubbed near station 0+95 along "Pearl Drive" must be PE and not DIP and shall be l"; ifa larger diameter service line is required, ajustification must be submitted to the city for review; all water main within 7.5' of catch basins shall be insulated, e.g' at stations 1+60 and 4+75 along "Pearl Drive"; all hydrants shall be located l0' away from light poles, e.g. at the intersection of"Pearl Drive" and "Purple Parkway"; on the profile, the future water main shall be called out as such and the plug should be illustrated for clarity. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 10. On Sheet 1.2: Lower water main to avoid the conflicts with storm sewer catch basins and to minimize the required drops/bends/fittings, up to a maximum of 10' below grade water main will be accepted, pending review and approval; all sanitary sewer shall have a minimum slope of 0.50%, e.g. pipe runs 6etwee, NAH tO-OSS to l6-094 maintain 0.4070; where "see water main offset detail" is .ull"d ort on plans indicate the page number for clarity. Condition does not apply to The Park 3"d Addition. 11. On Sheet 1.3: MH 16-084 shall be lowered to maintain a 4%; grade between MH 16-084 and MH l6-083; water main shall be lowered to avoid conflicts and to maintain a consistent grade past station 4+00; water and sanitary services to Lot 6, Block 4 and Lot 9, Block 3 shall be adjusted away fiom catch basins and be insulated if necessary; a gate valve shall be installed near the connection to the existing C900 off "Purple Parkway" near station 9+75; the note calling out "connection to existing 8,;DIP" shall be adjusted to 8" c900, for clarity. condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition, 12. On Sheet 1.4: The hydrant located between Lots 20 and 21, Block 4 shall be relocated between Lots 2l and 22, Block 4; water and sanitary services to Lot 4, Block 5 shall be adjusted The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 13 away from catch basin and be insulated if necessary. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 13. On Sheet 1.5: The submitted temporary traffic control plan indicates the use of MnDOT Traffic Control Layout 6K-17, however the provided proposal does not adhere to this standard and must be adjusted accordingly, e.g. the required buffer space is well below the standard; where CL-5 aggregate is called, a note is to be added identifying that the aggregate shall be rolled and compacted prior to opening the bypass; note 3 shall clearly state this work is to be conducted by the contractor and/or their subcontractor(s); the scale provided should be updated to a typical engineering scale; review and approval of the temporary traffic control plan by the county shall be provided to the city prior to any wLrk on County Road I17. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 14. On Sheet 1.6: Add "Road Work Ahead" sign 600 feet before the "One Lane Road Ahead" signage; add additional "Flagger Ahead" sign south of Wynsong Lane. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 15. On Sheet 2.1 : "Storm Sewer Construction Notes" indicate usage ofNeenah casting R- 3067V8 at catch basin low points, however the structure table does not indicate any "VB" structgres, update accordingly; the formatting under "Storm Stnrcture Table Notes" is not clear, it appears the notes are all related to water tight structures, if this is the case offsetting the sub-bullets 1e-n; may make this clearer, update accordingly. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 16. On Sheet 2.2: Ensure all storm sewer conveyance pipe is entirely below road sections. e.g. between CBMH 426 arld CBMH-425 the pipe would encroach into the road section as the cover from top ofpipe to proposed grade is 36", adjust storm sewer accordingly; profile shall be updated to include stationing; FES-433 shall include trash guard; all catch basins throughout the plan set shall be located perpendicular to each other when on opposing sides ofthe road, e.g. CBMH-431 and cBMH-43b shLould be updared accordingly. condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 17. On Sheet 2.3: Update plan view to show entire pipe run as CB-351 on plan view is not shown. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 18. On Sheet 2.4: CBMH-336 and CBMH-335 should be relocated to achieve a perpendicular alignment per condition 16 (above). This may be accomplished by locating it near station 1+20 to uuoid.orfli.t *ith Lot l, Block 2 driveway, furthermore this would allow for a recommended 2'x3' catch basin rather than a catch basin manhole. Condition does not epply to The Park 3'd Addition. 19. On Sheet 2.6: CBMH-303 shall have a 4-foot sump with SAFL baffle and the detail sheets shall be updated accordingly; update plans to indicate type ofplug identified east of CBMH-306; remove trash guard from FES-300. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 20. OnSheet3.l: The pedestrian ramp type called out in the legend (MnDOT 7036F) is a 2004 detail plate and has been discontinued, update accordingly; maintain a l0' separation from pedestrian ramps and catch basin castings at all times, e.g. in front ofLot 5, Block 6; a sidewalk detail should be included as typical either on the plan sheets or within the detail sheets and called out accordingly; construction notes regarding street sign locations and installations should be included, coordinaiion with Public Works is required; plans shall be updated to incorporate the pedestrian improvements at the intersection of Longacres Drive and Galpin Boulevard as conditioned upon apiroval of preliminary plat. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition' 21. On Sheet3.2: There is a call-out "???" over Lot 8, Block 6, either remove or clarifu' Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. 22. On Sheet 3.4: The "eyebrof', or halfcul-de-sac bubble, between stationing 3+00 and 4+00 should be constructed so that the flow line for street drainage is to be maintained 15.5' from centerline of "Alphabet Street", this is required in order to minimize the amount of street drainage being routed around the eyebrow and creating a "bird bath" or drainage issues abutting Lot 20, Block +. Condition does not apply to The Park 3'd Addition. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 14 E New Cond itions Based on Review of The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat l. On Sheet 3 of20: The water main shall be lowered sufficiently to avoid bends and the engineer ofrecord shall consult with city staff to evaluate connection methodologies in an effort to avoid redundant valves within the newly constructed segment of water main; a third gate valve may be added to the intersection of Pearl Drive and Visionary Court, pending the consultation with city staff previously discussed; insulation may be added under the storm crossing and water main near 9+10, pendingthe consultation previously discussed; add to notes/call-outs that existing sanitary sewer stubs' grades shall be verified. 2. On Sheet 7 of20: Relocate the draintile and/or proposed light pole near 7+25 to maintain at least 5' separation; provide justification to the downgrading ofreinforced concrete pipe from class 5 to class 4, including segments located under streets; center the storm main between CBMH 370 and CBMH 3l I within the abutting easements of Lots 6 and 7 Block l. 3. On Sheet 9 of20: illustrate street light called out at intersection ofPearl Drive and Fathers Song. 4. On Sheet l1 of20: The engineer of record shall consult with city staff regarding the grades and intersection design ofPearl Drive and Visionary Court; staff has concems regarding the spacing ofcatch basin in relation to the pedestrian ramp and grades in the area routing surface drainage. Stormwater C ondit ions & Wetlands I . Wetland permitting is req uired due to the proximity of and proposed impacts to wetlands on srte. permits will not be issued until approved wetland permits have 4g!i[9! for clarity and has been met for The Park Final P Grading been received. Condition has been lat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. The Park 3"r Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 15 2. Wetland review will include ensuring hydrology is maintained to all wetlands to be preserved as well as review of proposed stormwater impacts. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 3. Storm sewer sizing calculations should be provided to confirm storm sewer is sized to convey the lo-year storm event. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2trd Addition Final Ptat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 4. An NPDES permit and accompanying Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required prior to the start of eenstnre+ien gradine. Condition has been 4!![9g! for clarity and has been mit for The Park Final Plat and The Park 20d Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 5. An operations and maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater management system will be required irior to approval. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2id Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 6. provide infiltration test results per MPCA requirements in the location ofeach proposed infiltration area. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3"d Addition Final Plat. 7. All comments and conditions set fo(h by the Riley Purgatory BluffCreek Watershed District shall be addressed by the applicant. Condition still applies. 8. Show all existing storm sewer and other water resource-related features in plans. Condition has been met for The Park Final Ptat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. g. Adjust and show all easements over the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services' sanitary sewer on the preliminary and final plat. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat' 10. Clearly indicate what storm sewer will be private and what will be public. All public storm sewer will be iequired to be shown in profile view. Applicant should confirm there are no conflicts with the *ut", ,ii, o. .-itary sewer throughout the site. Condition has been met for The Park Finat plat and The Park 2nd Addition Finat Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. l l. The following comments pertain to all proposed ponds that include an infiltration bench (Basins 100,200 and 300): Infiltration test results will be required in the location ofall proposed infiltration benches and infiltration basins. Infiltration test results have not been submitted in the location of proposed Basin 100. If filtration is to be used, the applicant will need to provide a speiification for amended soils. Condition does not apply for The Park Final Plat or The Park 2od Addition Final Ptat or The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. a The Park 3'd Addilion Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 16 a The exfiltration above the piped outlet elevation should be included in the HydroCAD model and the exfiltration rate should correspond to what is presented in the infiltration test results. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. The proposed infiltration benches will be required to meet the 48-hour drawdown requirement. Condition has been met for The Park Final PIat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. a . Outlets from the pond should be moved out ofthe permanent pond area and should be moved away from the inlet to minimize the risk of short circuiting. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2,d Addition Final PIat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 12. The proposed piped outlet being modeled for Basin 400 is not shown in the plans. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plai and The Park 2'd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat 13. Access routes for all proposed stormwater basins are required for maintenance purposes. Applicant should call out access locations for all proposed stormwater basins. Condition has been met for Ttre Park Final Ptat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 14. A defined riprap EOF spillway will be required for all stormwater basins per details provided on Sheet 33. Applicant should include location and elevation ofall EOF spillways on the storm sewer plans. condition still applied to The Park l't and 2od Additions; condition does not apply to the Park 3"d Addition. 15. The soit borings provided show that there are clay soils throughout the site. Modeling should be updated to reflect the D soils present. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 16. Proposed and existing HydroCAD models should be modeling the same area. There is roughly l2b acres included in the existing conditions model that is not included in the proposed conditions model. All offsite drainage should be included in the models. Condition has been met for The park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat\ and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plet. 17. Existing and proposed conditions drainage area maps should be updated to show the location and boundarieiofall subcatchments included in the models. Condition has been met for The Park Final plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 18. Time of concentrations should be calculated in HydroCAD and not directly entered to confirm accuracy. Provide supporting calculations for all directly entered times of concentrations. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2ud Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 17 only remainin g tnconst stencv to update is the weir in OCS 400 should be c in HvdroC AD from a four-foot wei r to a five-u,eir. Condition has been 4g[[g! due to updated plans and nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'dhas been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2 Addition Final Plat. 22. The same total area should be modeled in P8 as in HydroCAD. Condition has been met for The park Final Plat and The Park 2'd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 23. The model should be run for at least 50 years and should include the most recent precipitation data included in the precipitation file to get accurate removal efficiencies. Condition 'h". b."o met for The Park Finai Plat and The Park 2'd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final PIat. 24. The modeling ofthe proposed stonnwater ponds with filtration benches is inconect and is overestimating the removal effiiiencies of the basins. The applicant should update the model for the stormwater basins in the following way: o The design infiltration rate should be added to the flood pool section of the stormwater pond devices where applicable. This will model infiltration above the outlet elevation. the design infiltration rate should match what is being modeled in HydroCAD' condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. o The infiltration basins should be removed from the model (except for Device 600i). Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. . Applicant should confirm total phosphorus and total suspended solids removal ,.quir.."nt. are still being met after the model has been updated. Condition has been 19. From the drainage area maps, it appears that P-LU 2-6 (P.E. Edio in the existing model conesponds to Pond 500P in the proposed conditions model. The modeled storage for the wetland differi between the existing and proposed conditions models but no wetland impacts are shown on Sheet 37 for this wetland. Applicant should update the models so that they have the same stotage modeled for the wetland. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2'd Addition Final Ptat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 20. There is a proposed piped outlet from this wetland that is over four feet lower than the current natgral spillway outlet. The applicant will be required 1o show that this does not change the hydrology of the existing wetland as part of the wetland permit requirements. Condition has been met for the Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 21. There ar.e ntunereus ineensisteneies betrveen what is shewn in the Plans en Sheet 35 fer the The The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page I 8 met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Finat Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 25. Watersheds 201 and 600 are only modeling the impervious area. The pervious area in these watersheds should be added to the model. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 26. Watershed 300 in the P8 model has 25%o impervious while the conesponding HydrocAD subwatershed has 45o/o impervious modeled. Applicant should update the models to be consistent with one another and representative ofthe plans. Condition has been met for The Park Finel Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Ptat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 27. The total areas listed in the table in Section III.A of the Stormwater Management Plan are inconsistent with the total area called out in the plans and the total area being modeled. Applicant should include the entire site in the areas shown in the table. Condition has been met for The Park Final plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. Zg. Any projects seeking a wetland alteration permit subject to this article will also be required to submit the-following: Existing and proposed drainage areas to wetlands; Buffer strip plan meeting the criteria of subseitions 20-41 1(c) and (d). Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 29. Sec.20-416. Mitigation. Wetland mitigation shall be undertaken on site. If this is not feasible, then mitigation may occur locally within the subwatershed. If this is not possible, then mitigation may ociur outside the subwatershed, elsewhere in the city. If mitigation cannot be accomplished on site, or if the city deems it necessary to perform mitigation off site, then the applicant shall be responsible for providing off-site mitigation within the major subwatershed, as deiignated by the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act, or purchasing wetland credits from the state wetland bank. Condition has been met for The Park Finat Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Ptat and The Park 3'd Addition Final PIat. 30. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality pretreatment as prescribed by City Code. Condition still applies. 31. If a Wetland Alteration Permit is issued allowing wetland alteration, the following standards shall be followed: (l) The alteration will not have a net adverse effect on the ecological and hydrological characteristics of remaining wetland, (2) It shall be located as to minimize the impact on u"g"Ltion, (3) It shall not adversely change water flow, (4) The size ofthe altered area shall be limitei to the minimum required for the proposed action, (5) The disposal of any excess material is prohibited within remaining wetland areas, (6) The disposal ofany excess material shall include proper erosion control and nutrient retention measures, (7) Alterations to any wetland area are p.oi,iUit.a during waterfowl breeding season or fish spawning season, unless itis determined by the city that the wetland is not used for waterfowl breeding or fish spawning, and (8) Alterations to *.tlurrd -.* shall be mitigated in accordance with the requirements of this article if the activity results in a loss of wetland area and/or function and value ofthe wetland. Condition has been met The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 19 for The Park Final Ptat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 32. The alteration shall not alter the hydrological pattems in the remainder ofthe wetland, ifa portion ofthe wetland remains, unless exempted under Sec. 20-417. Show how hydrologic pattems will not be altered for the remaining wetlands. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Ptat and The Park 3"d Addition Final Plat. 33. Sec. 20-405. Wetland delineation. An electronic copy ofthe delineated wetland boundaries must be submitted in a format compatible with the city's GIS database. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Finat Plat. 34. Sec. 20406. Wetland classification. All wetlands delineated under Sec. 20-405 of this article that have not been previously classified shall be classified using the results from the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions (MnRAM Version 3.0), or future versions. A MnRAM shall be completed by the property owner or applicant for each previously unclassified wetland. An electronic version of the MnRAM evaluation must be submitted to and approved by the city to establish the classification ofeach wetland prior to any alteration or impact toihe wetland. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final PIat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 35. Staff review will be conditional upon the approved Wetland Replacement Plan. Condition has been met for The Park Finat Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 36. A grading permit cannot be issued until the applicant has completed the WCA process' Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 37. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to the wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland bufler widths and locations where signage will be placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional informati on on signage placement in the city's guidance document. The WMO provides signs and sign pos ts for the cost of materials. Altemative signs (by the city or app licant) are also acceptable provided they contain similar information Wetland buffers and buffer setbacks tto section 20-41 I an d consistent with the preli mlnan plat must be memoriali zed with a reco rded wetland bu ffer aereement filed with the countv recorder's office. Condition has been modified from updated plans and still applies' 38. Sec. 19-146. Wetland elements. Water level fluctuations (peak elevation and duration) for wetlands shall be limited to two feet and duration not to exceed 48 hours So as to prevent the destruction of wildlife habitat and wetland vegetation. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page20 a Sedimentation basins or sediment removal devices shall be provided prior to discharge into wetlands. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. Variable bottom contours should be considered to provide deeper holes and flat shallow benches. This feature will provide habitat for diversity ofplants and wetland inhabitants for wetland mitigation sites and stormwater basins. Condition has been met for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. New Storm water and Wetlan d Conditions b ased on the review of The Park Final PIat l. The storm sewer calculations provided match The Park plans. The storm sewer calculations for future phases were inconsistent with the storm sewer shown in the preliminary plans. The applicant ihau "nsure storm sewer calculations match what is shown in the plans for future suimittals. Additional condition does not apply for The Park Final PIat and has been met for The Park 2nd Addition Final Plat and The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 3. Storm sewer from CB-241 to CB-240 is missing in the storm sewer calculalions. Additional condition does not apply for The Park Final Ptat or The Park 2'd Addition Final Plat or The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 2. Where possible, the applicant shall update all storm sewer so the ma,ximum pipe velocity is I 2 feet per second. If not possible, pipe velocities should not exceed I 5 feet per second per MnDOT guidance. Additional "ooditioo applies for The Park Final Plat and The Park 2od Addition Final Plat and has been met for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat, 4. Add pipe and structure callours for storm sewer between CBMH-343 and CBMH-345. Additional condition does not apply for The Park Finat Plat; Condition has been met for The Park 2'd Addition Finat Plat, and does not apply for The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat. 5. The 15" outlet pipe from CB-490 should be included in the HydroCAD model to ensure the pipe does not restrict flow and back up water at the low point. The l9" horizontal orifice should be routed to the 15" pipe. Condition has been met. 6. The slope of fie outlet pipe from Wetland 12 should be updated in the HydroCAD model to match what is illustrated on the plans. Condition has been met. 7. For the basins where filtration is proposed, the infiltration in P8 should be routed to the downstream waterbody instead of out of the system for accuracy. It appears the proposed stormwater system will still meet water quality requirements after the updates. Condition has been met. 8. Grading permits will not be issued until a USACE permit for impact to Wetland 14 has been issued and received by the city. Condition has been met. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 21 4 3. All trees shall be planted outside of the street right-of-way. This condition still applies overall and to each addition. efsgO+rees. This condition has been modified. The applicant shall meet the minimum requirement of 461 trees for the development. All required trees must meet minimum size requirements for deciduous and evergreen species' This condition has been met' 5. Buffer plantings shall be added to the east ofthe city well building. Five evergreen trees shall be planted to the east ofthe well house. This condition has been met. 6 M This condition has been modified. Any we ll house access road shall avoid removals of any significant trees in the outlot. No significant oaks may be removed. This+onditi€o{ti}kpPlie$ This condition does not apply to the 3rd addition' 7. Autumn Blaze maples shall be eliminated from the plant schedule. This condition has been met with landscape plan dated lll2lll9. g. Nonhem pin Oak shall be replaced with White, Bur, Red or Bicolor oak species in the plant schedule. This eenditien still applies everrll ond te eaeh sdditien- This condition has heen met with landscape plan dated lll2lll9. g. Additional selections oftree species shall expand the breadth of tree types and take into consideration soil conditions and future hardiness zone changes. This condition has been met' 10. No tree Genus shall comprise ofmore than 20% ofthe total number oftrees and no tree species shall comprise of more than l0% of the total number of trees. This4ondi+ioa-s+rlWies This condition has been met with landscape plan dated 1ll2lll9' 11. The applicant shall revise the plans to show the bluff impact zone on both bluffs and eliminate grading within these areas. This condition has been met. 12. private lot boundaries shall not encroach into bluff areas. This condition has been met. Landscapins and Tree Preservation l. The developer shall conduct a walk-through ofthe grading limits on site prior to removals with city staff to inipect for opportunities for additional tree preservation. This condition has been met, 2. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction;divities and remain installed until completion. This condition still applies overall and to each addition. 13. Lots with significant tree cover contain conservation easements to protect the wooded areas. Lots@l53andl54shallhaveprotectiveeasementsoverpartsof thelotcontainingexistingforest'Specifically, sea+ndi45, the westerly 200 feet ofLot 154 530, and the easterly 250300 200 feet ofLot 153 5+t. This condition does not apply to the 3'd addition. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS There is an existing 20-foot wide Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer and utility easement loiated on the property as illustrated on the submitted plans. Generally, the easement traverses from the northwest comer ofthe property to the southeast corner ofthe property, bisecting the site diagonally. The applicant is proposing to impact the easement at two locations. The firsllocation is withinihe northwest comer of the site where grading and construction of "Della Drive" and Basin 200 are proposed. The second location is to the east of "Visionary Court" where grading is proposed behind Lots 11-12. The MCES was supplied the applicant's site plans and all commints and conditions set forth by the MCES shall be addressed by the applicant. An agreement to construct any of the proposed improvements over the MCES's easement must be executed and supplied to the city for review prior to the issuance of grading permits. As grading and was proposed in these easements for The Park 2nd Addition and subsequently approved, these agreements irave been reached and were provided by the applicant prior to the issuance of grading for the 2nd Addition. The applicant is proposing standard drainage and utility easements (D&U's) around the majority of the lois on the provided pieliminary plat. Additional 2O-foot wide D&U's were provided within the preliminary plat on Lots 139-153 abutting "Della Drive" and Lots 166-169 abutting Topaz Drive. ihese ZO-foot wide D&U's are provided for stormwater collection and conveyance systems located in backyards that fall outside the standard D&U's. Furthermore, 30-foot wide D&U's between Lots 20-21 abutting "Fathers Song" and Lots 5-6 abufting "Paisley Path" have been proposed to provide access to proposed utilities and the north and south side of Basin 300. Thirty-foot (30-foot) wide D&U,s between Lots 151-152 abutting "Della Drive" were proposed on the preliminary plat to provide access to a water main extension to Ruby Lane. Right-of-way dedication was required along the east side of Galpin Boulevard per Carver County's rev-iew and ao.nrn"nt. (see "Carver County Developmenl / Access Review Commenls"), the Highway 117 Corridor Study, and the typical roadway sections identified in the county's Draft 2040 Comprehensive ptan. rne corridor Study identifies specific right-of-way needs and the -plat was ,"qrri."d to follow and be consistent with the prefened roadway alternative. The right-of-way was tied into now matches the existing highway right-of-way to the north and south ofthe development' The final plat proposal for The Park I't and 2nd Additions were reviewed and approved as to form and content by thi "ourrty suweyor and city, and after review by the city of the proposed final plat for The Park, adequate right-of-way has been dedicated. The applicant will be required to underground all overhead utilities within the development. Undeiground utilities reduce the risk ofaccidents, such as vehicles colliding with poles and service The Park 3'd Addition Final PIat December 14,2020 Page22 The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 23 impacts such as storms knocking down limbs on lines. It also improves the overall esthetics of ,oid*uy corridors and neighborhoods, which improves and promotes livability' EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY Water wells and septic fields have been identified on the existing conditions survey. The abandonment of ali existing wells shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health's review and regulations, and the abandonment ofall existing septic systems shall be in accordance with the Minnisota Pollution Control Agency's review and regulations. All required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be obtained prior to the commencement ofany abandonment(s). GRADING The applicant proposed to construct a total ofeight stormwater basins (Basins 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 800, 900) within and around the development. Through the preliminary grading plan and grading details, drainage from individual lots will be routed away from buildings into a series of iatch bisins and HDPE pipe located within drainage and utility easements in backyards. Drainage from proposed public streets will be collected through catch basins located next to curbs, and routed to stormwater basins within and around the site. The applicant previously provided an overall grading plan and a phased grading schedule for the entire subdivision as well as a grading plan for fn" part Z.o Addition, which included The Park 3'd Addition. Both plans generally conformed to city ordinances and standards for grading, with minor changes required and made per city staffs comments. The applicant met all the conditions enumerated with the grading development contract and mass grading operations associated with The Park 3'd Addition have been completed. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT This phase is not in the shoreland management area. RETAINING WALLS No retaining walls are being proposed with The Park 3'd Addition. STREETS The applicant proposed the construction of nine new streets with the preliminary plat (Della Drive, Pearl Drive, visionary court, Fathers Song, Alphabet street, Purple Parkway, Paisley Path, Paisley Cou(, and Rogers Court) and the extension ofone existing street (Lucy Ridge Lane) that shall be owned and maintained by the city after acceptance ofthe public improvements by the City Council. All newly constructed street sections shall be designed to meet the current standard specifications and detail plates for residential streets. These new streets and extensions will result in eight cul-de- sacs with seven ofthe eight proposed cul-de-sacs meeting current city code and standard specifications. "Della Drive", a newly constructed street and cul-de-sac in the northem section of the PUD, exceeds the maximum length for a cul-de-sac per city ordinance; however, it was approved in the preliminary plat by City Council. Engineering recommended approval of the cul-de-sac as the topogriphy would require substantial grading and the loss of sigrrificant trees that would alter the physical character ofthe property and surrounding parcels (Ordinance 18'57.k.2)' The applicant has supplied a geotechnical evaluation report that was completed by Braun Intertec corporation on June 29,2018. The report discussed and explored design and construction recommendations for roadway sections, amongst other topics. The updated plans and updated geotechnical evaluations provided since the original preliminary plat submittal show adequate boring information and provide sufficient guidance on the construction of the public streets. However, it will be required ofthe developer to have a geotechnical engineer onsite during $ading operations. If groundwater is encountered during grading, grades shall be adjusted to maintain a 3-foot separation from the bottom floor elevation of proposed buildings. Subsequent changes to grades shall be submitted to the city for review and approval. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 24 Street lights have been proposed throughout the development. Street lights will be required at all intersections and at the end of each cul-de-sac. The developer will need to work with Xcel Energy on the installation ofcity-approved street tights. A $300 fee shall be collected with the development contract for each street light for the purpose ofelectricity costs for the first year ofoperation. WATER The applicant is proposing to construct 8" PVC C900 water main throughout the development that shall G owned and maintained by the city after acceptance ofthe public improvements by the City Council. The development is located between two pressure zones in the city; a high pressure zone and a low pressure zone. To the west, in the Longacres neighborhood, is a high pressure zone. To the north and south, in the Ashling Meadows and Royal Oak Estates neighborhoods, respectively, are low pressure zones. The city has modeled the impact of the development based on the proposed usage. Il was found that in order to provide adequate pressures and fire flows, water mains shall be tiedinto the high pressure zone located on Galpin Boulevard. This will result in some areas ofthe development experiencing pressures above 90 PSI. Therefore, a portion of the homes will likely require individual private pressure reducing valves. The developer will need to work with the Building Department and Public Works Utility Department to determine which homes will require pressure-reducing valves. The majority ofthe water main to be installed is within the central and southern portion ofthe development (The Park I't, 2'd and 3'd Additions). The applicant is proposing to create a looped water system that meets the city's best management practices for water utilities. Looped systems improve reliability by feeding water from two directions rather than one, which subsequently allows service to continue during an event that may otherwise cause disruption to water service. The Park 3'd Addition will complete the looped system within this portion of the PUD. Water main connections were tied into the high zone water system offGalpin Boulevard' From the proposed preliminary water plans, there are areas where water main, sanitary sewer main, and storm sewer mains will cross. All crossings of water and sewer utility mains are required to have 18" ofvertical separation and l0' of horizontal separation, measured from the edge ofpipe. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 25 Where water mains cross sanitary sewer mains and do not meet vertical or horizontal separation requirements, the sanitary sewer shall be constructed of C900 water main material. All crossings shall be required that the sanitary sewer pipe length shall be centered over the water main crossing. The applicant's engineer shall consult with city staff regarding the vertical alignments ofutilities within The Park 3.d Addition, along with connection methodologies to potentially reduce redundant gate valves on the newly construction public utility. The applicant shall ensure all fire hydrant spacing meets fire codes and are subject to the review and approval of the Fire Department. SANITARY SEWER The applicant is proposing to construct 8" PVC sanitary sewer main throughout the development that shall G owned and maintained by the city after acceptance ofthe public improvements by the City Council. The entire PUD's sanitary sewer system will operate as a gravity system and connects to existing sanitary sewer mains at three locations; Lucy Ridge Lane, a direct connection to the MCES sanitary sewer trunk line on "Della Drive", and at the Majestic Way extension offof "Paisley Path". The preliminary plans submitted utilize a nomenclature for identifring proposed manholes that aligns with the city's. The city provided a list of appropriate manhole identifiers, as well as fire hydrant identifiers. This will ensure an efficient transition ofthe newly constructed public improvements into the city's asset management system for sanitary sewer manholes and fire hydrants. The applicant shall ensure the city's manhole naming conventions supplied are incorporated within the plans and on all future submittals (e.g. sanitary televising videos). STOR}IWATER MAI\AGEMENT General L The applicant has delineated all wetlands on the property and agencies have approved the boundaries and trpe. 2. Wetland permitting was required due to the proximity and proposed impacts to wetlands onsite. Grading permits were issued as all approved wetland permits have been received. See "l{etland Alterarron " of this staff report for more information. 3. An NPDES permit has been obtained by the applicant. 4. An operations and maintenance plan for the proposed stormwater management systems has been entered into with the Riley Pwgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) and the applicant. 5. All comments and conditions set forth by the RPBCWD shall be addressed by the applicant. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 26 Preliminarv Plans lnfiltration test results will be required in the location ofall proposed infiltration benches and infiltration basins. Infiltration test results have not been submitted in the location of proposed Basin 100. If filtration is to be used, the applicant will need to provide a specification for amended soils. WETLAND ALTERATION The preliminary plat plan set showed intent to impact several wetlands on site. A Wetland Replacement Plan application was submitted to the city and reviewed per the WCA. A Notice of Deiision and Approval for the wetland Replacement Plan was sent on June 6, 2019. Wetland mitigation was approved through the purchase of wetland credits with wetlands being replaced at a ratio of2:1. wetland 14, proposed to be impacted during The Park ("1't Addition"), required a United States Army Corps of Engineering (USACE) permit as it was determined to be a USACE jurisdictional wetland. The approved permit was submitted to the city. Wetland buffers using buffer averaging have been applied to the project. Wetland buffers and buffer setbacks pursuant to section 20-41I and consistent with the preliminary plat must be memorialized with a recorded wetland buffer a$eement filed with the county recorder's oftce' EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The proposed development exceeded one (l) acre ofdisturbance and therefore was subjected to the Geniraf Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity Under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has prepared and submitted a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the city and has obtained an NPDES Construction Permit for The Park 3'd Addition. An updated erosion and sediment control plan meeting the requirements of City Ordinance Sec. l9-145 was submitted for review and was subsequently approved prior to the commencement of grading operations. Financial Assurance To guarantee compliance with the plans, and related remedial work, a cash escrow or letter ofcredit, satiifactory to the city, shall be fumished to the city before a Notice to Proceed is issued for The park 3'd Addition. The escrow amount shall be $796,107.94, which is I l0% of the estimated costs of construction for The Park 3'd Addition. The city may use the escrow or draw upon the letter ofcredit to reimburse the city for any labor or material costs it incurs in securing compliance with the plan or in implementing the plan. The city shall endeavor to give notice to the owner or developer before p.o""iding, buisuch notice shall not be required in an emergency as determined by the city. The ^r*-""ihull be maintained until final stabilization and removal of erosion and sediment controls and acceptance ofdedicated public streets and public utilities. STORMWATER UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGES Section 4-30 of City Code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and water quantity fee are collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use gpe and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. It is calculated as shown in the table below: S [RI]{CE IVATER, DEVE-OP\IT.\-T TT-E ARE\PTR,\CRT] FTI r( Rlr;tla CR.OSS ARLA s8_190 r 0.02 t7 s 85.084.23 s8.190 t (16.519.84) NET ARJ:A 8.0759 s 68561.39 The total estimated SWMP Fee is $68,564.39 for the entire subdivision at rates in affect for 2020. ASSESSMENTS Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. The remaining partial hookups fees are due with the building permit. FEES Based on the proposal, the following fees would be collected with the development contract if the final plat were to be recorded in 2020: . Administration Fee: Ifthe improvement costs are between $500,000 and $ 1,000,000, 2% of the improvement costs. If the improvement costs exceed $1,000,000,2.5% of the first $1,000,000 plus 1.5% ofthe remainder which is equal to S18,279'53. o Surface Water Management Fee for the entire subdivision at 2020 rates: $68,564.39 . A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,392/wit (@ 3l units = $74'152.00) . A portion ofthe sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $691/unit (@ 3l units = $21,421.00) . GIS fees: $25 for the plat plus $10 per parcel @ 31 units: $335.00 o Final Plat Process (Attorney fee for review and recording ofPlat and DC): $450.00 . Street light operating fee for one year: $300 per light @ 5 lights : $ I ,500.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE PARK 3Nd ADDITION FINAL PLAT Plannine l. All l9l acres must be included in the PUD. 2. All los and homes must be developed consistent with the standards in the Compliance Table. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page27 RICI IT-OF-WA Y t.9158 The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 28 Engineerine 1. Any requirements set by the MCES to work within the MCES's sewer and utility easement shall be addressed by the applicant. 2. Ongoing coordination with the county and city regarding future improvements to Galpin Boulevard. 3. The developer shall abandon all existing wells and septic fields in accordance with all federal, state, and local regulatory agency standards, and obtain all necessary permits for said abandonments. Prior to commencement of abandonment activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city. 4. All newly constructed streets and the extension ofany existing streets shall be public streets, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance ofthe public improvements by the City Council. 5. A geotechnical engineer shall be on-site during grading operations. If groundwater is encountered during grading, grades shall be adjusted to maintain a three foot separation from the bottom floor elevation and adhering to the recommendations of the soil engineer on site. Changes to grades shall be submitted to the city for review and approval. 6. All curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city's Detail Plates #5215-5215D. 7. A detail of the proposed street lights shall be provided prior to the issuance ofbuilding permits. 8. Street lights within the development shall be owned and maintained by the electric utility company, be installed at all intersections and at the end ofeach cul-de-sac subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All newly constructed water mains shall be public water mains, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance ofthe public improvements by the City Council. 10. All utility crossings ofpotable water and sanitary and/or storm mains will require l8 inches of vertical separation and 10 feet of horizontal separation. The developer shall submit construction plans with profiles and plan views ofthe utilities for review and approval prior to the commencement of any utility construction. 11. All utility crossings ofpotable water and sanitary sewer that do not meet vertical separation requirements will require that the sanitary sewer main at thal crossing be constructed ofPVC C900 water main material. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating material type at these locations for review and approval ofthe city prior to the commencement ofany utility construction. 12. Water mains shall be constructed at a minimum of 7.5 feet below grade, or insulated, and constructed in conformance with the city's standard specifications and detail plates. 13. Cluster valves located around water main tees shall be installed at a minimum of five feet fiom the tees to the valves, where feasible. All valve locations and any other water main appurtenances shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Public Works departments prior to the commencement of any utility construction. The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page29 14. All comments and conditions regarding fire appurtenances, spacing, and location set forth by the Fire department shall be addressed by the applicant. 15. All newly constructed sewer mains shall be public sewer mains, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance ofthe public improvements by the City Council. 16. PVC sanitary sewer pipes that will be constructed at a burial depth of 0-16 feet shall be constructed ofpipe class SDR 35, burial depths of 16-26 feet shall be of pipe class SDR 26, and burial depths of greater than 26 feet shall be ofpipe class C900. 17. Inverts that have a 2o-inch or greater differential shall be supplied inside drops per city standards and be constructed per the city's Detail Plate No. 2104. 18. Untreated or stormwater from lots not captured and routed to treatment facilities, particularly in backlots, require a conveyance system to be installed to route stormwater to treatment basins. 19. No sump structues shall be installed in backyard pickups. 20. Access routes to storm basins shall have a slope no geater than 3:1. 21. Driveways shall be setback in accordance section 20-l 122 ofCity Ordinances. 22. All driveways shall be located outside side lot drainage and utility easements. 23. A $300 fee per light shall be collected with the development contract for electricity costs for the first year of operation. 24. The developer shall coordinate with the Building Department and Public Works Utility Departrnent to determine which homes shall be required to install private pressure reducing valves prior to the issuance of building permits. 25. The contractor shall contact the city inspector for inspection ofall insulated pipe crossings. 26. On Sheet 3 of20: The water main shall be lowered suffrciently to avoid bends and the engineer ofrecord shall consult with city staff to evaluate connection methodologies in an effort to avoid redundant valves within the newly construction segment of water main; a third gate valve may be added to the intersection of Pearl Drive and Visionary Court, pending the consultation with city staff previously discussed; insulation may be added under the storm crossing and water main near 9+10, pendingthe consultation previously discussed; add to notes/call-outs that existing sanitary sewer stubs' grades shall be verified. 27. On Sheet 7 of20: Relocate the draintile and/or proposed light pole near 7+25 to maintain at least 5' separation; provide justification to the downgrading of reinforced concrete pipe from class 5 to class 4, including segments located under streets; center the storm main between CBMH 370 and CBMH 3 I I within the abutting easements of Lots 6 and 7 Block I ' 28. Song. On Sheet 9 of20: illustrate street light called out at intersection ofPearl Drive and Fathers The Park 3'd Addition Final Plat December 14,2020 Page 30 29. On Sheet 11 of20: The engineer ofrecord shall consult with city staff regarding the $ades and intersection design of Pearl Drive and Visionary Court; staff has concerns regarding the spacing ofcatch basin in relation to the pedestrian ramp and grades in the area routing surface drainage. Stormwater Condit ions & Wetlands L All comments and conditions sel forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be addressed by the applicant. 2. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality pretreatment as prescribed by City Code. 3. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to the wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland buffer widths and locations where signage will be placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional information on signage placement in the city's guidance document. The WMO provides signs and sign posts for the cost of materials. Altemative signs (by the city or applicant) are also acceptable provided they contain similar information. Wetland buffers and buffer setbacks pursuant to section 20-411 and consistent with the preliminary plat must be memorialized with a recorded wetland buffer agreement filed with the county recorder's office. Landscapine and Tree Preservation l. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 2. All trees shall be planted outside ofthe street right-of-way. g:\planuolg planning cases\19{l galpin site preliminar} plat and rezoning pud\final plal 3rd addition\taffrepon cc.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA THE PARK 3rd ADDITION DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) i TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL ............................................................................ SP-1 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL ........................................................................ SP-1 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS ............................................................................................ SP-1 4. IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................................................ SP-2 5. TIME OF PERFORMANCE ......................................................................................... SP-2 6. SECURITY .................................................................................................................... SP-2 7. NOTICE ......................................................................................................................... SP-3 8. OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS................................................................................ SP-3 9. GENERAL CONDITIONS ........................................................................................... SP-5 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. RIGHT TO PROCEED ................................................................................................. GC-1 2. PHASED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................ GC-1 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS ................................................................................ GC-1 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS ..................................................................... GC-1 5. IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................................... GC-1 6. IRON MONUMENTS .................................................................................................. GC-2 7. LICENSE ...................................................................................................................... GC-2 8. SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ......................................................... GC-2 8A. EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING OR OTHER BUILDING ......................................................................................... GC-2 9. CLEAN UP ................................................................................................................... GC-3 10. ACCEPTANCE AND OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................... GC-3 11. CLAIMS ....................................................................................................................... GC-3 12. PARK DEDICATION .................................................................................................. GC-3 13. LANDSCAPING .......................................................................................................... GC-3 14. WARRANTY ............................................................................................................... GC-4 15. LOT PLANS ................................................................................................................. GC-4 16. EXISTING ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................................... GC-4 17. HOOK-UP CHARGES ................................................................................................. GC-4 18. PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING..................................................................................... GC-4 19. SIGNAGE ..................................................................................................................... GC-5 20. HOUSE PADS .............................................................................................................. GC-5 21. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS ................................................................................ GC-5 22. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT ......................................................................................... GC-6 22. MISCELLANEOUS A. Construction Trailers ........................................................................................ GC-6 B. Postal Service .................................................................................................... GC-7 C. Third Parties ...................................................................................................... GC-7 D. Breach of Contract ............................................................................................ GC-7 ii E. Severability ....................................................................................................... GC-7 F. Building Permits ............................................................................................... GC-7 G. Waivers/Amendments ....................................................................................... GC-7 H. Release .............................................................................................................. GC-7 I. Insurance ........................................................................................................... GC-7 J. Remedies ........................................................................................................... GC-8 K. Assignability ..................................................................................................... GC-8 L. Construction Hours ........................................................................................... GC-8 M. Noise Amplification .......................................................................................... GC-8 N. Access ............................................................................................................... GC-8 O. Street Maintenance............................................................................................ GC-8 P. Storm Sewer Maintenance ................................................................................ GC-9 Q. Soil Treatment Systems .................................................................................... GC-9 R. Variances........................................................................................................... GC-9 S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations ..................................... GC-9 T. Proof of Title ..................................................................................................... GC-9 U. Soil Conditions................................................................................................ GC-10 V. Soil Correction ................................................................................................ GC-10 W. Haul Routes ......................................................................................................... GC-10 X. Development Signs .............................................................................................. GC-10 Y. Construction Plans ............................................................................................... GC-10 Z. As-Built Lot Surveys ........................................................................................... GC-11 SP-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) THE PARK 3rd ADDITION SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated December 14, 2020 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, U.S. HOME CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A LENNAR, (the "Developer" and “Owner”). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for THE PARK 3rd ADDITION (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 30 days after the City Council approves the plat. 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A: Final plat approved December 14, 2020, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. Plan B: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated October 14, 2019, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. Plan C: Plans and Specifications for Improvements dated October 18, 2019, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. Plan D: Landscape Plan dated November 21, 2019, prepared by Pioneer Engineering. SP-2 4. Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Water Drainage System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading/Restoration H. Underground Utilities (e.g. gas, electric, telephone, CATV) I. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments J. Surveying and Staking K. Landscaping L. Erosion Control 5. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements except for the wear course on public streets by November 15, 2021. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City Engineer. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 6. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank acceptable to the City, or cash escrow ("security") for $796,107.94. The amount of the security was calculated as 110% of the following: Sanitary Sewer $ 117,047.50 Watermain $ 98,810.00 Storm Sewer, Drainage System, including cleaning and maintenance $ 133,011.60 Streets/Street Lights/Signs $ 315,107.50 Sub-total, Construction Costs $ 663,976.60 Engineering, surveying, and inspection (7% of construction costs) $ 46,478.36 Landscaping (2% of construction costs) $ 13,279.53 Sub-total, Other Costs $ 59,757.89 TOTAL COST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $ 723,734.49 SECURITY AMOUNT (110% of 723,734.49) $796,107.94 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The security shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for SP-3 any violation of the terms of this Contract. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. With City approval, the security may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid, but in no case shall the security be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount until (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required “record” plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 7. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: Joe Jablonski U.S. Home Corporation D/B/A Lennar 16305 36th Avenue NE, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 Phone: 952-249-3014 E-Mail: joe.jablonski@lennar.com Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 8. Other Special Conditions. A. FEES 1. Prior to release of the plat for recording and prior to scheduling a pre-construction meeting, Developer shall submit to the City fees in effect at the time of recording of final plat. If recorded in 2020, City fees are estimated to be $184,701.92, as listed below: Administration fee (based on estimated construction cost of $2,626,114.95, 2.5% for the first $1,000,000 + 1.5% of the remainder) $ 18,279.53 GIS fee: 57 parcels @ $10/parcel + $25 for the plat $ 335.00 Partial payment of City sewer and water hookup fees: 57 units @ $691/unit (sewer) + $2,392/unit (water) $95,573.00 Street light operating fee: 7 lights @ $300/light $ 1,500.00 Attorney Fee for Review and Recording of Plat and DC $ 450.00 Surface Water Management Fee $68,564.39 Total $184,701.92 SP-4 If the signs must be installed in frost conditions, an additional $250/post must be paid by the Developer. B. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning 1. All 191 acres must be included in the PUD. 2. All lots and homes must be developed consistent with the standards in the Compliance Table. Engineering 1. Any requirements set by the MCES to work within the MCES’s sewer and utility easement shall be addressed by the applicant. 2. Ongoing coordination with the county and city regarding future improvements to Galpin Boulevard. 3. The developer shall abandon all existing wells and septic fields in accordance with all federal, state, and local regulatory agency standards, and obtain all necessary permits for said abandonments. Prior to commencement of abandonment activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the city. 4. All newly constructed streets and the extension of any existing streets shall be public streets, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 5. A geotechnical engineer shall be on-site during grading operations. If groundwater is encountered during grading, grades shall be adjusted to maintain a three foot separation from the bottom floor elevation and adhering to the recommendations of the soil engineer on site. Changes to grades shall be submitted to the city for review and approval. 6. All curb ramps shall be constructed to meet ADA standards and the city’s Detail Plates #5215-5215D. 7. A detail of the proposed street lights shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. Street lights within the development shall be owned and maintained by the electric utility company, be installed at all intersections and at the end of each cul-de-sac subject to review and approval by the city prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All newly constructed water mains shall be public water mains, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 10. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary and/or storm mains will require 18 inches of vertical separation and 10 feet of horizontal separation. The developer shall submit SP-5 construction plans with profiles and plan views of the utilities for review and approval prior to the commencement of any utility construction. 11. All utility crossings of potable water and sanitary sewer that do not meet vertical separation requirements will require that the sanitary sewer main at that crossing be constructed of PVC C900 water main material. The developer shall submit construction plans indicating material type at these locations for review and approval of the city prior to the commencement of any utility construction. 12. Water mains shall be constructed at a minimum of 7.5 feet below grade, or insulated, and constructed in conformance with the city’s standard specifications and detail plates. 13. Cluster valves located around water main tees shall be installed at a minimum of five feet from the tees to the valves, where feasible. All valve locations and any other water main appurtenances shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Public Works departments prior to the commencement of any utility construction. 14. All comments and conditions regarding fire appurtenances, spacing, and location set forth by the Fire department shall be addressed by the applicant. 15. All newly constructed sewer mains shall be public sewer mains, owned and maintained by the city, after acceptance of the public improvements by the City Council. 16. PVC sanitary sewer pipes that will be constructed at a burial depth of 0-16 feet shall be constructed of pipe class SDR 35, burial depths of 16-26 feet shall be of pipe class SDR 26, and burial depths of greater than 26 feet shall be of pipe class C900. 17. Inverts that have a 20-inch or greater differential shall be supplied inside drops per city standards and be constructed per the city’s Detail Plate No. 2104. 18. Untreated or stormwater from lots not captured and routed to treatment facilities, particularly in backlots, require a conveyance system to be installed to route stormwater to treatment basins. 19. No sump structures shall be installed in backyard pickups. 20. Access routes to storm basins shall have a slope no greater than 3:1. 21. Driveways shall be setback in accordance section 20-1122 of City Ordinances. 22. All driveways shall be located outside side lot drainage and utility easements. 23. A $300 fee per light shall be collected with the development contract for electricity costs for the first year of operation. 24. The developer shall coordinate with the Building Department and Public Works Utility Department to determine which homes shall be required to install private pressure reducing valves prior to the issuance of building permits. 25. The contractor shall contact the city inspector for inspection of all insulated pipe crossings. SP-6 26. On Sheet 3 of 20: The water main shall be lowered sufficiently to avoid bends and the engineer of record shall consult with city staff to evaluate connection methodologies in an effort to avoid redundant valves within the newly construction segment of water main; a third gate valve may be added to the intersection of Pearl Drive and Visionary Court, pending the consultation with city staff previously discussed; insulation may be added under the storm crossing and water main near 9+10, pending the consultation previously discussed; add to notes/call-outs that existing sanitary sewer stubs’ grades shall be verified. 27. On Sheet 7 of 20: Relocate the draintile and/or proposed light pole near 7+25 to maintain at least 5’ separation; provide justification to the downgrading of reinforced concrete pipe from class 5 to class 4, including segments located under streets; center the storm main between CBMH 370 and CBMH 311 within the abutting easements of Lots 6 and 7 Block 1. 28. On Sheet 9 of 20: illustrate street light called out at intersection of Pearl Drive and Fathers Song. 29. On Sheet 11 of 20: The engineer of record shall consult with city staff regarding the grades and intersection design of Pearl Drive and Visionary Court; staff has concerns regarding the spacing of catch basin in relation to the pedestrian ramp and grades in the area routing surface drainage. Stormwater Conditions & Wetlands 1. All comments and conditions set forth by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District shall be addressed by the applicant. 2. Stormwater runoff shall not be discharged into wetlands without water quality pretreatment as prescribed by City Code. 3. Wetland Buffers. Wetland buffers and buffer monumentation will be required adjacent to the wetlands on site. Please indicate wetland buffer widths and locations where signage will be placed on a plan sheet. Please find additional information on signage placement in the city’s guidance document. The WMO provides signs and sign posts for the cost of materials. Alternative signs (by the city or applicant) are also acceptable provided they contain similar information. Wetland buffers and buffer setbacks pursuant to section 20-411 and consistent with the preliminary plat must be memorialized with a recorded wetland buffer agreement filed with the county recorder’s office. Landscaping and Tree Preservation 1. Tree preservation fencing shall be installed around existing trees to be saved prior to any construction activities and remain installed until completion. 1. All trees shall be planted outside of the street right-of-way. SP-7 9. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Contract are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. SP-8 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Elise Ryan, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2021, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and by Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC SP-9 U.S. HOME CORPORATION D/B/A/ LENNAR: BY: Jonathan Aune, Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2021, by Jonathan Aune, Vice President of U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, D/B/A Lennar, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 208738v2 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Outlot B, THE PARK 2nd ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. 208738v2 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 208738v2 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2______, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2______. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ 208738v2 GC-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Title’s Office of the County where the plat is located, and 4) the City Engineer has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 3. Preliminary Plat Status. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within two (2) years after preliminary plat approval. 4. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. Improvements. The improvements specified in the Special Provisions of this Contract shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, and plans and specifications which have been prepared and signed by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and other pertinent agencies before proceeding with construction. The City will, at the Developer's expense, have one or more construction inspectors 208738v2 GC-2 and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer shall also provide a qualified inspector to perform site inspections on a daily basis. Inspector qualifications shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its project engineer/inspector to respond to questions from the City Inspector(s) and to make periodic site visits to satisfy that the construction is being performed to an acceptable level of quality in accordance with the engineer's design. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 7. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 8. Site Erosion and Sediment Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion and sediment control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion and sediment transport. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion and sediment transport at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Erosion and sediment control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored, even if construction has been completed and accepted. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion and sediment control, the City will authorize the removal of the erosion and sediment control, i.e. hay bales and silt fence. The Developer shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. 8a. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. 208738v2 GC-3 9. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 10. Acceptance and Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. After completion of the improvements, a representative of the contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection of the work with the City Engineer. Before the City accepts the improvements, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the Developer and his engineer shall submit a written statement to the City Engineer certifying that the project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The appropriate contractor waivers shall also be provided. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall be by City Council resolution. 11. Claims. In the event that the City receives claims from laborers, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment out of the financial guarantees posted with the City, and if the claims are not resolved at least ninety (90) days before the security required by this Contract will expire, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125% of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees. 12. Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay full park dedication fees in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. The park dedication fees shall be the current amount in force at the time of final platting pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinances and City Council resolutions. 13. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with Plan D. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City’s approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2½) inches caliper, either bare root in season, or balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line). In addition to any sod required as a part of the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, the Developer or lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways on each lot utilizing a minimum of six (6) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the lot. If these improvements are not in place at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, a financial guarantee of $750.00 in the form of cash or letter of credit shall be provided to the City. These conditions must then be complied with within two (2) months after the certificate of occupancy issued, except that if the certificate of occupancy is issued between October 1 through May 1 these conditions must be complied with by the following July 1st. Upon expiration of the time period, inspections will be conducted by City staff to verify satisfactory completion of all conditions. City staff will conduct inspections of incomplete items with a $50.00 inspection fee deducted from the escrow fund for each inspection. After satisfactory inspection, the financial guarantee shall be 208738v2 GC-4 returned. If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. 14. Warranty. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to two (2) years from the date of final written acceptance. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following acceptance by the City. 15. Lot Plans. Prior to the issuance of building permits, an acceptable Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control including silt fences, and Tree Removal Plan shall be submitted for each lot for review and approval by the City Engineer. Each plan shall assure that drainage is maintained away from buildings and that tree removal is consistent with development plans and City Ordinance. 16. Existing Assessments. Any existing assessments against the plat will be re-spread against the plat in accordance with City standards. 17. Hook-up Charges. . At the time of final plat approval the Developer shall pay 30% of the City Sewer Hook-up charge and 30% of the City Water hook up charge for each lot in the plat in the amount specified in Special Provision, Paragraph 8, of this Development Contract. The balance of the hook-up charges is collected at the time building permits are issued are based on 70% of the rates then in effect, unless a written request is made to assess the costs over a four year term at the rates in effect at time of application. 18. Public Street Lighting. The Developer shall have installed and pay for public street lights in accordance with City standards. The public street lights shall be accepted for City ownership and maintenance at the same time that the public street is accepted for ownership and maintenance. A plan shall be submitted for the City Engineer's approval prior to the installation. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $300.00 for each street light installed in the plat. The fee shall be used by the City for furnishing electricity and maintaining each public street light for twenty (20) months. 208738v2 GC-5 19. Signage. All street signs, traffic signs, and wetland monumentation required by the City as a part of the plat shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer. 20. House Pads. The Developer shall promptly furnish the City "as-built" plans indicating the amount, type and limits of fill on any house pad location. 21. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall pay an administrative fee in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. This fee is to cover the cost of City Staff time and overhead for items such as review of construction documents, preparation of the Development Contract, monitoring construction progress, processing pay requests, processing security reductions, and final acceptance of improvements. This fee does not cover the City's cost for construction inspections. The fee shall be calculated as follows: i) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is less than $500,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs; ii) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs for the first $500,000 and two percent (2%) of construction costs over $500,000; iii) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is over $1,000,000, two and one-half percent (2½%) of construction costs for the first $1,000,000 and one and one-half percent (1½%) of construction costs over $1,000,000. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall deposit with the City a fee based upon construction estimates. After construction is completed, the final fee shall be determined based upon actual construction costs. The cost of public improvements is defined in paragraph 6 of the Special Provisions. B. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City for providing construction and erosion and sediment control inspections. This cost will be periodically billed directly to the Developer based on the actual progress of the construction. Payment shall be due in accordance with Article 21E of this Agreement. C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. D. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. 208738v2 GC-6 E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. G. Private Utilities. The Developer shall have installed and pay for the installation of electrical, natural gas, telephone, and cable television service in conjunction with the overall development improvements. These services shall be provided in accordance with each of the respective franchise agreements held with the City. H. The Developer shall pay the City a fee established by City Council resolution, to reimburse the City for the cost of updating the City’s base maps, GIS data base files, and converting the plat and record drawings into an electronic format. Record drawings must be submitted within four months of final acceptance of public utilities. All digital information submitted to the City shall be in the Carver County Coordinate system. 22. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 23. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the pre-construction meeting for installation of public improvements. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the acceptance of the public improvements unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer’s obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City’s failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. The City may also issue 208738v2 GC-7 a stop work order halting all plat development until the breach has been cured and the City has received satisfactory assurance that the breach will not reoccur. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Building Permits. Building permits will not be issued in the plat until sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer have been installed, tested, and accepted by the City, and the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site graded and revegetated in accordance with Plan B of the development plans. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property . After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. I. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $500,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. J. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. K. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. 208738v2 GC-8 L. Construction Hours. Construction hours, including pick-up and deliveries of material and equipment and the operation of any internal combustion engine, may only occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no such activity allowed on Sundays or on legal holidays. Contractors must require their subcontractors, agents and supplies to comply with these requirements and the Contractor is responsible for their failure to do so. Under emergency conditions, this limitation may be waived by the written consent of the City Engineer. If construction occurs outside of the permitted construction hours, the Contractor shall pay the following administrative penalties: First violation $ 500.00 Second violation $ 1,000.00 Third & subsequent violations All site development and construction must cease for seven (7) calendar days M. Noise Amplification. The use of outdoor loudspeakers, bullhorns, intercoms, and similar devices is prohibited in conjunction with the construction of homes, buildings, and the improvements required under this contract. The administrative penalty for violation of construction hours shall also apply to violation of the provisions in this paragraph. N. Access. All access to the plat prior to the City accepting the roadway improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer regardless if the City has issued building permits or occupancy permits for lots within the plat. O. Street Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until streets within the plat are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed by the Developer when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If streets become impassable, the City may order that such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth roadway surface and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City plow snow on the streets prior to final acceptance of the streets. The City shall have complete discretion to approve or reject the request. The City shall not be responsible for reshaping or damage to the street base or utilities because of snow plowing operations. The provision of City snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. P. Storm Sewer Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system (including ponds, pipes, catch basins, culverts and swales) within the plat and the adjacent off-site storm sewer system that receives storm water from the plat. The Developer shall follow all instructions it receives from the City concerning the cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system. The Developer's obligations under this paragraph shall end two (2) years after the public street and storm drainage improvements in the plat have been accepted by the City. Twenty percent (20%) of the storm sewer costs, shown under section 6 of the special provisions of this contract, will be held by the City for the duration of the 2-year maintenance period. Q. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the platting process for each lot. This shall be 208738v2 GC-9 done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. R. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District(s); 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. T. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. U. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. V. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi-lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. W. Haul Routes. The Developer, the Developer’s contractors or subcontractors must submit proposed haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose. All haul routes must be approved by the City Engineer X. Development Signs. The Developer shall post a six foot by eight foot development sign in accordance with City Detail Plate No. 5313 at each entrance to the project. The sign shall be in place before construction of the required improvements commences and shall 208738v2 GC-10 be removed when the required improvements are completed, except for the final lift of asphalt on streets. The signs shall contain the following information: project name, name of Developer, Developer’s telephone number and designated contact person, allowed construction hours. Y. Construction Plans. Upon final plat approval, the Developer shall provide the City with two complete sets of full-size construction plans and four sets of 11”x17” reduced construction plan sets and three sets of specifications. Within four months after the completion of the utility improvements and base course pavement and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with the following: (1) a complete set of reproducible Mylar as-built plans, (2) two complete full-size sets of blue line/paper as-built plans, (3) two complete sets of utility tie sheets, (4) location of buried fabric used for soil stabilization, (5) location stationing and swing ties of all utility stubs including draintile cleanouts, (6) bench mark network, (7) digital file of as-built plans in both .dxf & .tif format (the .dxf file must be tied to the current county coordinate system), (8) digital file of utility tie sheets in either .doc or .tif format, and (9) a breakdown of lineal footage of all utilities installed, including the per lineal foot bid price. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. Z. As-Built Lot Surveys. An as-built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as-built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as-built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as-built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as-built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Rev. 3/31/06 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1100 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Date: PC Date: CC Date: 60-Day Review Date: Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply) (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application) Comprehensive Plan Amendment ......................... $600 Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Single-Family Residence ................................ $325 All Others......................................................... $425 Interim Use Permit (IUP) In conjunction with Single-Family Residence .. $325 All Others......................................................... $425 Rezoning (REZ) Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 Minor Amendment to existing PUD ................. $100 All Others......................................................... $500 Sign Plan Review ................................................... $150 Site Plan Review (SPR) Administrative .................................................. $100 Commercial/Industrial Districts* ...................... $500 Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area: (______ thousand square feet) *Include number of existing employees: __________ *Include number of new employees: __________ Residential Districts ......................................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_____ units) Subdivision (SUB) Create 3 lots or less ........................................ $300 Create over 3 lots ....................... $600 + $15 per lot (_____ lots) Metes & Bounds (2 lots) .................................. $300 Consolidate Lots .............................................. $150 Lot Line Adjustment ......................................... $150 Final Plat .......................................................... $700 (Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)* *Additional escrow m ay be required for other applications through the development contract. Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC) ........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) .................................................... $200 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) Single-Family Residence ............................... $150 All Others ....................................................... $275 Zoning Appeal ...................................................... $100 Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. Notification Sign (City to install and remove) ...................................................................................................................... $200 Property Owners’ List within 500’ (City to generate after pre-application meeting) .................................................. $3 per address (____ addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply) ....................................................................... $50 per document Interim Use Permit Variance Site Plan Agreement Wetland Alteration Permit Deeds Conditional Use Permit Vacation Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) Easements (____ easements) TOTAL FEE: Section 2: Required Information Description of Proposal: Property Address or Location: Parcel #: Legal Description: Total Acreage: Wetlands Present? Yes No Present Zoning: Requested Zoning: Present Land Use Designation: Requested Land Use Designation: Existing Use of Property: Check box if separate narrative is attached. Section 3: Property Owner and Applicant Information APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. If this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROPERTY OWNER: In signing this application, I, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Signature: Date: PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Contact: Address: Phone: City/State/Zip: Cell: Email: Fax: Section 4: Notification Information Who should receive copies of staff reports? *Other Contact Information: Property Owner Via: Email Mailed Paper Copy Name: Applicant Via: Email Mailed Paper Copy Address: Engineer Via: Email Mailed Paper Copy City/State/Zip: Other* Via: Email Mailed Paper Copy Email: This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS WETLAND 6 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 11 WETLAND 13 WETLAND 14 WETLAND 12 BASIN 400 BASIN 300 BASIN 600BASIN 800 BASIN 500 BASIN 900 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-COVER 1COVER LOCATION MAP STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTIONSTORM SCHEDULE SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION LEGEND SHEETCOVER SHEETSHEET INDEX1.2.3-5. 6.7-8. THE PARK 3RD ADDITION UTILITY & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA R STREET CONSTRUCTION9-12.DETAILS13-20.STREET & UTILITY EROSION CONTROL21. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-LGND 2LEGEND I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2ND ADDITION3RD ADDITION3RD A D DI TI O N 2ND A D DI TI O N 3RD AD D I T I O N 2ND AD D I T I O N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 12-05-201819860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-SSWR 3SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION PEARL DRIVE 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-SSWR 4SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 12-05-201819860 VISIONARY COURT 3RD A D D I T I O N 2ND A D D I T I O N 3R D A D D I T I O N 2N D A D D I T I O N 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-SSWR 5SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55446 I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota 42299 12-05-201819860 FATHERS SONG I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-STRM-SCHD 6STORM SCHEDULE 2ND ADDITION3RD ADDITIONI hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-STRM 7STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 3RD ADDITION3RD ADDITION2ND ADDITION.III 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-STRM 8STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2ND ADDITION3RD ADDITION3RD A D DI TI O N 2ND A D DI TI O N 3RD AD DI TI O N 2ND AD D I T I O N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-ROAD 9STREET CONSTRUCTION PEARL DRIVE 3RD A D D I T I O N 2ND A D D I T I O N 3R D A D D I T I O N 2N D A D D I T I O N 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-ROAD 10STREET CONSTRUCTION I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 VISIONARY COURT FATHERS SONG 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-ROAD 11INTERSECTION DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 PEARL DRIVE AND VISIONARY COURT PEARL DRIVE AND FATHERS SONG I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-DTLS 12DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-DTLS 13DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-DTLS 14DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-DTLS 15DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-DTLS 16DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-DTLS 17DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-DTLS 18DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-DTLS 19DETAILS WETLAND 6 BASIN 600BASIN 800 LEGEND I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 20OFTHE PARK 3RD ADDITION CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-18-19 PJC/BNM PDS/BNM Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 01-08-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-18-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 03-ENG-118100-SHEET-EROS-UTIL 20STREET & UTILITY EROSION CONTROL WETLAND 6 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 11 WETLAND 13 WETLAND 14 WETLAND 12 BASIN 400 BASIN 300 BASIN 600BASIN 800 BASIN 500 BASIN 900 2ND ADDITION 3RD ADDITION OUTLOT A OUTLOT A OUTLOT BOUTLOT COUTLOT D02-ENG-118100-SHEET-GRAD-COVR 1COVER LOCATION MAP SEEDING PLANEROSION CONTROL PLANGRADING PLANLEGEND SHEETCOVER SHEETSHEET INDEX1.2.3-4.5.6. THE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Know what's below. before you dig.Call R GRADING & EROSION CONTROL DETAILS7-8. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 8OFTHE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-14-2019 PJC/BNM MSN/MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 02-03-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-14-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2. 03-12-20 City Comments3. 05-27-20 Client Comments4. 10-06-20 Basin 600 02-ENG-118100-SHEET-LGND 2LEGEND I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 8OFTHE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-14-2019 PJC/BNM MSN/MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 02-03-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-14-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2. 03-12-20 City Comments 02-ENG-118100-SHEET-GRAD 3GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 8OFTHE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-14-2019 PJC/BNM MSN/MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 02-03-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-14-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2. 03-12-20 City Comments3. 05-27-20 Client Comments OUTLOT A OUTLOT BOUTLOT COUTLOT D02-ENG-118100-SHEET-GRAD 4GRADING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 8OFTHE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-14-2019 PJC/BNM MSN/MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 02-03-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-14-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2. 03-12-20 City Comments3. 05-27-20 Client Comments4. 10-06-20 Basin 600 WETLAND 6 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 11 BASIN 400 BASIN 300 BASIN 600BASIN 800 BASIN 500 OUTLOT A OUTLOT A OUTLOT BOUTLOT COUTLOT DLEGEND 02-ENG-118100-SHEET-EROS 5EROSION CONTROL PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 8OFTHE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-14-2019 PJC/BNM MSN/MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions1. 02-03-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-14-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2. 03-12-20 City Comments3. 05-27-20 Client Comments WETLAND 6 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 1 WETLAND 11 BASIN 400 BASIN 300 BASIN 600BASIN 800 BASIN 500 OUTLOT A OUTLOT A OUTLOT BOUTLOT COUTLOT D· · · · · · · · · · · · · · 02-ENG-118100-SHEET-SEED 6SEEDING PLAN I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 8OFTHE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-14-2019 PJC/BNM MSN/MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 02-03-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-14-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2. 03-12-20 City Comments3. 05-27-20 Client Comments · · · · · · · · · · · 02-ENG-118100-SHEET-GRAD-DTLS 7GRADING DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 8OFTHE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-14-2019 PJC/BNM MSN/MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 02-03-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-14-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2. 03-12-20 City Comments 02-ENG-118100-SHEET-GRAD-DTLS 8GRADING DETAILS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota c 8OFTHE PARK PHASE 2 GRADING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA LENNAR 16305 36TH AVENUE NORTH 10-14-2019 PJC/BNM MSN/MPC Name Reg. No.Date Revisions 1. 02-03-20 City Comments Date Designed Drawn 2019 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. Mendota Heights, MN 55120 2422 Enterprise Drive (651) 681-1914 Fax: 681-9488www.pioneereng.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSLAND SURVEYORSLAND PLANNERSCIVIL ENGINEERS 10-14-2019 Paul J. Cherne PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544619860 2. 03-12-20 City Comments CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Consider a Request for an Amendment to Chanhassen Gateway PUD, Modification to PUD Specific Design Features, and Amendment to Crossroads of Chanhassen Site Plan with Variances for Construction of a 5,100 SF Automotive Repair Shop Located at 8941 Crossroads Boulevard; and Approval of Summary Ordinance Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4. Prepared By Sharmeen AlJaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202021 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 5,100 squarefoot automotive repair shop, Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops with standards, and Summary Ordinance for publication purposes, Planning Case 202021 as shown in plans dated, Received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and Decision, subject to conditions." Approval requires a 4/5 Vote. SUMMARY The request consists of two applications to facilitate the construction of an automotive facility. The request includes a PUD amendment to existing standards, and Site Plan Approval for a 5,100 squarefoot automotive facility. The site is located southeast of Crossroads Boulevard. Access to the site will be gained off of Crossroads Boulevard. The site is zoned Planned Unit DevelopmentMixed Use. BACKGROUND On December 1, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed this request. The site plan and ordinance amendment were approved unanimously. The Planning Commission minutes are attached to this report. DISCUSSION 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment: The first request is to amend the permitted uses section to allow automotive repair shops. 2. Site Plan: The second request is for a site plan to construct a 5,100 squarefoot automotive repair shop. This use is not permitted under the PUD ordinance governing the site. If the requested amendment is not approved, the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectConsider a Request for an Amendment to Chanhassen Gateway PUD, Modification to PUDSpecific Design Features, and Amendment to Crossroads of Chanhassen Site Plan withVariances for Construction of a 5,100 SF Automotive Repair Shop Located at 8941 CrossroadsBoulevard; and Approval of Summary OrdinanceSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4.Prepared By Sharmeen AlJaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202021PROPOSED MOTION"The Chanhassen City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 5,100 squarefoot automotive repair shop,Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops withstandards, and Summary Ordinance for publication purposes, Planning Case 202021 as shown in plans dated,Received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and Decision, subject to conditions."Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.SUMMARYThe request consists of two applications to facilitate the construction of an automotive facility. The request includes aPUD amendment to existing standards, and Site Plan Approval for a 5,100 squarefoot automotive facility.The site is located southeast of Crossroads Boulevard. Access to the site will be gained off of Crossroads Boulevard.The site is zoned Planned Unit DevelopmentMixed Use.BACKGROUNDOn December 1, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed this request. The site plan and ordinance amendmentwere approved unanimously. The Planning Commission minutes are attached to this report.DISCUSSION1. Planned Unit Development Amendment:The first request is to amend the permitted uses section to allow automotive repair shops.2. Site Plan: The second request is for a site plan to construct a 5,100 squarefoot automotive repair shop. This use is not permitted under the PUD ordinance governing the site. If the requested amendment is not approved, the request for the site plan cannot proceed. The total permitted site coverage is 70 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 43.8%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of highquality materials which include brick, concrete block and EIFS. The design of the building is harmonious with the surrounding buildings. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon amending the PUD to allow the use of automotive repair shops. Parking and nine garage doors have been screened properly. Access to the site is provided via internal curb cuts off of Crossroads Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen City Council approves the site plan consisting of a 5,100 squarefoot automotive repair shop, Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops with standards, and Summary Ordinance for publication purposes, Planning Case 202021 as shown in plans dated Received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and Decision, subject to conditions. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Recommendation Ordinance Amendment Summary Ordinance Development Review Application Narrative Civil Plans Colored Site Plan Exhibit Exterior Elevation Colored Exterior Elevations Colored Renderings Memo from Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Memo from Carver County Public Works Email from Ms. Nancy Smith Email from Mr. Jeff Erpelding Letter from MnDOT Affidavit of Mailing December 1, 2020 Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF CHANHASSEN PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop, Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops with standards, and Summary Ordinance, Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and Decision, subject to conditions.” (Note: A motion for denial and appropriate Findings of Fact are also included at the end of the report.) PC DATE: December 1, 2020 CC DATE: December 14, 2021 REVIEW DEADLINE: Waived CASE #: 2020-21 BY: SJ, ET, EH, MU, DJ, JS SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Planned Unit Development amendment to allow auto repair facilities, amendments to design standards and a site plan for the construction of a 5,100 square foot automotive repair shop (Christian Brothers Automotive). LOCATION: SE of Crossroads Boulevard, 8941 Crossroads Boulevard (Lot 3, Block 1, Crossroads of Chanhassen). APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: Kimley-Horn & Assoc., Inc. Kraus-Anderson Inc. Christian Jones Chrystal Seelhammer 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100 525 S.8th Street St. Paul, MN 55114 Minneapolis, MN 55404-1030 Christian.Jones@kimley-horn.com chrystal.seelhammer@krausanderson.com 763-251-1016 612-255-2345 PRESENT ZONING: Planned Unit Development, Mixed Use - PUD, Mixed Use 2040 LAND USE PLAN: Mixed Use ACREAGE: 0.79 acres DENSITY: N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving amendments to PUDs because the City is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A PUD amendment must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 2 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The request consists of two applications to facilitate the construction of an automotive facility. The request includes a Planned Unit Development amendment to existing standards, and Site Plan Approval for a 5,100 square foot automotive facility. The site is located southeast of Crossroads Boulevard. Access to the site will be gained off of Crossroads Boulevard. The site is zoned Planned Unit Development- Mixed Use. The following is a summary of the requests: 1. Planned Unit Development Amendment: The first request is to amend the permitted uses section to allow automotive repair shops. 2. Site Plan: The second request is for a site plan to construct a 5,100 square foot automotive repair shop. This use is not permitted under the PUD ordinance governing the site. If the requested amendment is not approved, the request for the site plan cannot proceed. The total permitted site coverage is 70 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 43.8%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high-quality materials which include brick, concrete block and EIFS. The design of the building is harmonious with the surrounding buildings. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon amending the planned unit development to allow the use of automotive repair shops. Parking and nine garage doors have been screened properly. Access to the site is provided via internal curb cuts off of Crossroads Boulevard. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 3 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article VII, Planned Unit Development District Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 7, Design Standards for Commercial, Industrial, and Office- Institutional Developments BACKGROUND The Land Use Plan designates areas around the TH 101/TH 212 interchange as Mixed Use. This category has been established to accommodate either commercial or high-density residential developments. The high-density category, which includes units with a maximum net density of 16.0 units per acre, accommodates apartments and higher density condominium units, but would also permit the development of townhome-type units. The commercial use is intended to support or complement high-density residential development. Commercial uses may include convenience grocery stores, daycare facilities, etc., or those uses that meet the daily needs of the residents. The Planned Unit Development governing this development needs to be amended and standards for the use developed in order for the site plan to be considered and approved. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 4 Concept Plan On January 4, 2005, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the Concept PUD for the site (not to be confused with site plan approval). This plan was later approved by City Council on January 24, 2005. This final concept layout reflected a residential component within the areas located north and south of Lake Susan Drive with the highest density concentration facing Highway 101. The portion of the site located south of Highway 212 consisted of a mix of commercial and residential uses. In that instance, the residential part encompassed the western portion of the site while the commercial part occupied the remainder of the site, and faced Highways 101, 212, and Lyman Boulevard. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 5 Development Plan On June 27, 2005, the City Council approved rezoning the property from Residential Single Family to Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use and adopted the Planned Unit Development ordinance that regulated and set standards for the development of this site including permitted uses, landscaping, setbacks, signage, building materials, architectural standards, parking, etc. On February 27, 2006, the Chanhassen City Council approved a site plan for the construction of a three-story multi-family building containing 48 units, located northwest of the intersection of Highways 212/101 (north site). On January 24, 2008, the City requested the vacation of right-of-way along old Trunk Highway 101. A portion of the old highway occupies the westerly portion of the site. Development of the westerly portion of the site is contingent upon Minnesota Department of Transportation vacating the right-of-way. Amended Development Plan On March 10, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council approved the following: • Planned Unit Development amendment clarifying setbacks, signage, and retail building size. • Variance request to allow a 20-foot setback from Lyman Boulevard and a 20-foot setback from Highway 101. • Preliminary plat for Planning Case 2008-01 for Crossroads of Chanhassen. • Seven site plans consisting of a 5,300 square-foot convenience store with gas pumps and a 2,805 square-foot car wash (Building 4A), a multi-tenant building with an area of 11,000 square feet (Building 4B), a two-story multi- tenant building with a first floor area of 13,800 square feet and second floor area of 15,000 square feet (Building 4C), a one-story retail building with an area of 8,000 square feet (Building 4D), a 5,000 square-foot bank with drive-thru window (Building 4E), a 3,400 square-foot retail building (Building 4F), and a 10,000 square-foot Deli and Liquor Store (Building 4G). Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 6 On April 28, 2008, the City Council approved a final plat to subdivide 14.9 acres into three lots and one outlot - Crossroads of Chanhassen. On July 14, 2008, the Chanhassen City Council granted final plat approval for Crossroads of Chanhassen 2nd Addition creating two lots and one outlot for the area of the development that is being reviewed as part of the development proposal for the daycare. That plat was never recorded. As part of the submittal, staff directed the applicant to conduct a traffic study to evaluate the trip generation and circulation of the site along with the impact to the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Highway 101. A traffic study was performed by the applicant's engineer and reviewed by the City’s traffic consultant. Internally, the site has acceptable circulation. The only external site issue that was discovered is at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Crossroads Boulevard. Access spacing guidelines for Carver County do not allow a signal at this intersection. The possibility exists that the County could someday switch the access to Crossroads Boulevard to a right-in/right-out or block some of the turning movements. On March 26, 2012, the Chanhassen City Council approved a Planned Unit Development amendment to the existing standards; Preliminary and Final Plat to subdivide 6.15 acres into one lot and one outlot (Crossroads of Chanhassen 2nd Addition); and Site Plan Approval for construction of a daycare facility (Primrose of Chanhassen). This request combined Buildings 4F and 4G into a single building. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 7 SITE PLAN In order to provide a better understanding of the overall development, staff will first review the site plan component, which in turn leads to the PUD amendment. The building must comply with the Development Design Standards for Chanhassen Gateway. A PUD is required to be developed to a higher quality than other projects. Site coverage is averaged over the entire development. This is permitted under the PUD ordinance (Section 20-505(e)). The total permitted site coverage is 70 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 43.8%. The design of the 5,100 square foot building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high quality materials. They include brick, EIFS accents, rough-face block, awnings, and glass. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. Shared parking is centrally located on the site. It is buffered from views by buildings and landscaping. Staff had multiple conversations with the applicant and explained that the proposed building should be unique yet be harmonious and complement the buildings on the block. The proposed design of the building, as well as the materials used, fit and complement existing structures. All 9 garage doors and parking lot are properly screened. Complimentary design elements include parapet walls, pronounced entryway and awnings around the windows to soften the look of the building. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 8 Below is a colored rendering with the proposed materials which will make the building architecturally a fitting element of the overall development. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 9 Parking is proposed along the southeast half of the site. Buffering/screening of the parking and the garage doors will be discussed in the Landscaping section of this report. The applicant is proposing a bench at the entrance of the building. The structure is proposed to be located on Lot 3, Block 1, Crossroads of Chanhassen. One monument sign is proposed along the northwest corner of the site. The sign must meet all sign ordinance requirements. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 10 The ordinance regulating this development limits signage to two elevations per building. The size of the individual letters may not exceed 30 inches and the sign must comply with ordinance. Wall signs are proposed above the three middle garage doors and the rear of the building. All signage (Monument and Wall signs) shall use individual dimension letters, at least one-half inch deep. The logo may not exceed 30% of the total sign area. All buildings within the development of Crossroads of Chanhassen must maintain a 20- foot setback from the right-of-way. To continue the vernacular perspective, the applicant will maintain this setback. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 11 LIGHTING The applicant has submitted a lighting and photometric plan. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. All light fixtures must be consistent with the approved lighting plans. Staff is recommending that the lights be consistent with the approved fixtures in the development. Parking lot light fixtures may be 25 feet tall. All fixtures must be shielded. Monterey PARKING The ordinance requires auto repair shops to provide one parking space per 500 square feet of gross floor area. The entire Crossroads PUD shares parking spaces. The total required for the entire development is 247. The total proposed including the subject site is 278. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size, Portion and Placement Entries: The building has a pronounced entrance. Articulation: The building is part of a PUD. The buildings are intended to complement each other. The proposed building blends in and complements the architecture of the surrounding structures. It has unique features. All garage doors, parking and trash enclosure are properly screened. Signs: All signage must meet the sign criteria in the Planned Unit Development Design Standards for Chanhassen Gateway. W. 78th Street Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 12 Material and Detail High quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the building are earth tones. All materials are highly compatible with the existing buildings. Height and Roof Design The maximum building height in this PUD varies based on the use. The building meets the minimum set in the ordinance. The roofline is staggered, complements and is harmonious with the surrounding buildings. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views. Façade Transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and/or doors except the southwest elevation. It is however properly screened. Loading Areas, Refuse Areas, Etc. The trash enclosure is located along the northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 1. The exterior material must be of the same exterior material as the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: (1) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 13 (5) Creation of a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship with existing and future buildings. It does provide a compatible visual relationship. Approval of this building is contingent upon approval of the permitted uses of the Planned Unit Development ordinance to allow auto repair shops with standards. PUD AMENDMENT Allow an Auto Repair Shop: The language in the PUD currently does not permit any type of auto repair facilities. Staff has been working with the applicant and has had numerous discussions to prepare a plan that can meet the intent of the ordinance. The proposed location is the farthest from any residential development but staff still has concerns. This type of establishment can generate loud noises from power tools. In the summer, all garage doors remain open and the sound can carry to surrounding areas. Should the City approve this amendment, staff recommends adding the following language under permitted uses: • Automotive Repair Shop on Lot 3, Block 1, with the following standards: o No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on-premises except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. o All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance of vehicles shall occur Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 14 with closed building except minor maintenance including, but not limited to, tire inflation, addition oil and wiper replacement. o No public address system. o No sales, storage or display of used automobiles or other vehicles such as motorcycles, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles. o Disposal of vehicle fluids shall comply with PCA regulations. o Facilities for the collection of waste oil must be provided. o All service/garage doors shall be screened. o The building architecture shall complement surrounding buildings. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FINDINGS The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The site is guided Mixed Use (residential and neighborhood commercial). An auto repair shop can provide some convenience to neighboring properties. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed use can generate noise. The design and architecture of the proposed building is compatible with the surrounding buildings (design standards, landscaping, architecture, etc.). c) The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The proposed use will conform with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as design standards, signage, durable materials, uses, etc. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed use is intended to meet the daily needs of the area. It could potentially add convenience to the homeowners in the area. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 15 Finding: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. f) Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. ACCESS Vehicular access to the site was originally provided from Crossroads Boulevard, a public street designed and built to Municipal State Aid Standards, during the construction of the original build-out of Crossroads of Chanhassen in 2008. The applicant is proposing to remove and restore the single access from Crossroads Boulevard in order to facilitate the proposed site plan layout. The removal and restoration of the original access will be required to meet the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates and will require a traffic control plan for review and approval prior to commencement of construction activities on-site. The applicant is proposing that the building be located at the western edge of the site, angled parallel to Crossroads Boulevard, with the customer facing side of the building internal to the development, with parking located directly east of the building. With the proposed layout, vehicular access will be had from two driveways connected by the internal, private roads of the Crossroads of Chanhassen to the north and south of the site (see image below). Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 16 The south driveway appears to propose no extraordinary issues, however, the north driveway entrance may negatively impact vehicular traffic on Crossroads Boulevard due to the spacing from the intersection with Crossroads Boulevard. The applicant was required to provide analysis that the proposed north driveway location is adequately spaced as to not create adverse impacts to Crossroads Boulevard and that the largest design vehicle accessing the site could turn into the north driveway access from Crossroads Boulevard (from both northbound and southbound movements). The provided analysis proved the north access feasible. Crossroads Boulevard intersections with Lyman Boulevard, a Carver County road, and Highway 101, which is governed by MnDOT. Plans were provided to both parties for review, and any applicable comments and conditions set by Carver County and MnDOT must be addressed. The applicant will be required to provide a brief traffic memo identifying changes to the PUD trip generation levels, traffic patterns, and impacts to the County and MnDOT intersections compared to the original PUD plan and traffic study as the site was not analyzed based on the intended use (previous trip generations were based on a drive-thru bank). EASEMENTS A 10-foot public drainage and utility easement along the western portion of the property was recorded with the original plat from 2008 for Crossroads of Chanhassen. As all utilities and Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 17 roads within the development are privately owned and maintained and covered under cross access agreements or private easements, no additional public easements are required from the proposed site plan. It is recommended that the applicant verify that all private easements and cross access agreements and their subsequent conditions are adhered to prior to construction. GRADING The first phase of the Crossroads of Chanhassen PUD completed mass grading of the site to achieve the relative elevations required for the site to be built-out. As such, the applicant is not proposing mass grading or major alterations to existing elevations of the site. However, as improvements are installed (underground and surface stormwater facilities, installation of utilities, paving and construction of parking areas, building pads, etc.) the site will expose soils and will be required to meet all erosion control measures as addressed under “Drainage and Erosion Control” of this report. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will exceed 5,000 square feet of land area disturbance, and as such, will require an erosion and sediment control plan submitted to the City. This shall be a stand along document that includes all required information listed in Chapter 19-145(a)(2) of the Chanhassen City Code. The applicant appears to have provided a sufficient erosion and sediment control plan, with minor amendments required. All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. The proposed erosion control measures and BMPs appear adequate. However, if at any time during the construction of the site prior to final stabilization, these measures are found to be inadequate, additional BMPs will be required to meet the NPDES permit. All exposed soil areas shall have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover year round. In the event that dewatering is needed, the city inspector shall be contacted prior to any dewatering activities. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The proposed development consists of a new automotive repair building, parking lot, associated utilities, and an underground and surface stormwater management BMPs. The 0.80-acre site is subject to the requirements of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD). The existing site consists of a vacant grass area with slopes of 1% to 4% encompassing much of the site. Prior to the proposed development, stormwater from the northeastern portion of the site flows to an existing inlet to the north of the site along an internal road for the overall development and is conveyed to the public storm sewer system. The western and northwestern portion of the site flows west to Crossroads Boulevard, a paved public street. Stormwater from the eastern and southern portion of the site flows to an existing area drain inlet on the south portion of the site and connects to the existing underground stormwater system. After development, site improvements will maintain existing drainage patterns. Stormwater runoff from a portion of the roof and a majority of the paved parking surface will discharge to a proposed underground stormwater infiltration system, noted on the plans as BMP #2. The Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 18 underground stormwater infiltration system is proposed to be perforated 36” pipe. Overflow from this BMP is routed to the existing underground storm sewer network. Stormwater runoff from the western portion of the roof will discharge to an infiltration basin, noted on the plans as BMP #1, on the west side of the proposed building. Overflow from this BMP is routed to an existing catch basin within Crossroads Boulevard. These BMPs appear to be adequate to treat stormwater runoff from the site. All stormwater from the site eventually runs to MnDOTs BraeBurn Pond, which was constructed with the off ramp of Highway 212. The applicant has evaluated that the impervious surface from this site will not inundate or negatively impact the downstream MnDOT facility based on new rainfall requirements (TP-40 vs NOAA Atlas 14). Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of runoff and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). In addition, the project will need a permit from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District prior to beginning construction activities. The RPBCWD provided a memorandum outlining the need for a permit and listed potential District rules that this project might meet. These rules are not considered exhaustive of all potential RPBCWD rules or provisions that may apply. The City encourages the applicant to work directly with RPBCWD to obtain the necessary approvals and permit. UTILITIES (SANITARY/WATER) The developer of the Crossroads of Chanhassen installed private sanitary sewer and water main throughout the development during the 2008 build-out of the PUD, and the proposed site has adequate sanitary and water services which will be had from these private utility extensions. The applicant is proposing to abandon an existing water service stub located near the southwest corner and southeast corner of the site. These service laterals were installed with the Crossroads of Chanhassen and the proposed abandonment appears to be due to the proposed site layout. Abandonment of the existing water services shall meet the City’s Standard Specifications and Detail Plates (Specifications). The applicant is proposing to service the site with 1” PVC water service and a 6” PVC sanitary sewer service to be connected directly to the existing 8” stub. As required by Ordinance, the subject development is required to pay sanitary sewer and water hookup charges. These fees are based on the number of SAC units assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. The 2020 rates are $2,302.00/unit and $7,974.00/unit for sanitary sewer and water, respectively. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION Minimum requirements for landscaping at the proposed development include 1,484 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, 3 landscape islands or peninsulas, and 6 trees for the Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 19 parking lot. The applicant’s proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table. Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 1,484 sq. ft. 1,484 sq. ft. Trees/parking lot 6 trees 6 trees Islands or peninsulas/parking lot 3 islands/peninsulas 3 islands/peninsulas The applicant meets minimum requirements for landscaping. The applicant has proposed screening for the garage doors or parking spaces. Adequate screening of this area is provided by evergreen shrubs along the eastern property line. Boulevard trees are required along Crossroads Boulevard every 30 feet. The applicant has proposed additional trees to meet the current spacing of existing trees. The applicant is protecting seven existing trees on site. These trees will be covered by the same standards as the proposed landscaping and will require replacement if damaged or dead upon inspection. Compliance Table Boundary Building/Parking Setbacks (feet) Proposed Lyman Boulevard 20/20 NA Highway 101 North of Highway 212 50/50 NA Highway 101 South of Highway 212 20/20 NA Highway 212 50/50 NA Northerly Project Property Line 50/20 NA Westerly Project Property Line 50/20 NA Internal Project property lines 0/0 N 20’ E 70’ S 37’ W20’ Internal Right-of-Way (Crossroads Boulevard) 20/20 20/20 Hard Surface Coverage-Residential 50% NA Commercial and Office Hard Surface Coverage 70% 68.1%. Maximum Commercial (Retail) Building/Structure Height 1 story 1 Story Maximum Office Building/Structure Height 2 stories NA Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less NA Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 20 RECOMMENDATION Alternative 1: The City Council approves: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT "The City Council approve the Planned Unit Development amendment in the attached ordinance for Chanhassen Gateway allowing Automotive Repair shops with the following standards: • "Automotive Repair Shop on Lot 3, Block 1, with the following standards: o No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on-premises except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. o All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance of vehicles shall occur within closed building except minor maintenance including, but not limited to, tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. o No public address system. o No sales, storage or display of used automobiles or other vehicles such as motorcycles, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles. o Disposal of vehicle fluids shall comply with PCA regulations. o Facilities for the collection of waste oil must be provided. o All service/garage doors shall be screened. o The building architecture shall complement surrounding buildings." SITE PLAN APPROVAL "The City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop, Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and DecisionRecommendation, subject to the following conditions: Environmental Resources Conditions: 1. All existing trees on site to be saved during construction shall be protected at all times by tree preservation fencing. Trees that are damaged or dead will be replaced. Engineering: 1. The applicant shall provide a traffic control plan for review and approval for the removal and restoration of the original access had from Crossroads Boulevard prior to commencement of construction activities on-site. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate sanitary sewer and water trunk hook-up fees at the time of building permit issuance. These fees are based on the number of SAC units Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 21 assigned by the Met Council and are due at the time of building permit issuance. The 2020 rates are $2,302.00/unit and $7,974.00/unit for sanitary sewer and water, respectively. 3. Prior to commencement of any construction activities, a copy of all required permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be provided to the City which shall include, but is not limited to: the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed, etc. Water Resources: 1. The applicant has provided an erosion and sediment control plan as required by Chapter 19-145 of the City Code. The applicant shall update the plans to include the City’s Water Resources Coordinator as the contact on the plans (Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator, 952-227-1168). 2. The applicant shall evaluate and analyze that the impervious surface from this site will not inundate or negatively impact the downstream MnDOT facility based on new rainfall requirements (TP-40 vs NOAA Atlas 14). This analysis must be provided to the City under separate cover. Planning: 1. Approval of the site plan shall be contingent upon approval of the Planned Unit Development amendment to allow Automotive Repair shops. 2. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 3. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 4. The exterior material for the trash enclosure must be of the same exterior material as the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. 5. The monument sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area nor be higher than five feet. The sign shall be located 10 feet from the property line. A sign permit is required before construction of the sign. 6. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 7. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure as the trash. 8. Any prior approvals for a bank building on the subject site shall be null and void. 9. No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on-premises except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. Christian Brothers Automotive Planning Case No. 2020-21 December 14, 2020 Page 22 10. All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance of vehicles shall occur within closed building except minor maintenance including, but not limited to, tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. 11. No public address system. 12. No sales, storage or display of used automobiles or other vehicles such as motorcycles, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles. 13. Disposal of vehicle fluids shall comply with PCA regulations. 14. Facilities for the collection of waste oil must be provided. 15. All service/garage doors shall be screened. Alternative 2: The Planning Commission recommends denial of the Planned Unit Development Amendment to allow an Automotive Repair Shop and denial of a site plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop, Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated received October 30, 2020, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Ordinance Amendment 3. Summary Ordinance 4. Development Review Application and Narrative 5. Plan Sets 6. Letter from Riley Purgatory Watershed District dated September 12, 2020 7. Letter from Carver County Public Works dated September 25, 2020 8. E-mail from Ms. Nancy Smith dated September 28, 2020 9. E-mail from Mr. Jeff Erpelding dated September 17, 2020 10. Letter from MnDOT 11. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-21 8941 crossroads blvd (christian bros automotive)\revised documents 10-30-20\staff report december 14, cc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION (APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Kimley-Hom & Assoc. Inc. for the following: I . Planned Unit Development Amendment to the existing standards - Chanhassen Gateway. 2. Site Plan Review for the construction ofa 5,100 square foot Automotive Repair Shop (Building 4E). On December 1, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Kimley-Hom & Assoc. Inc. for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and Site Plan Review (Planning Case 2020-21). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Site Plan and Planned Unit Development Amendment preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT l. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development-Mixed Use, PUD-Mixed Use' 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Mixed Use. 3. The legal description of the property is Lot 3, Block l, Crossroads of Chanhassen. 4. The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6) possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six (6) effects and our findings regarding them are: a) The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. fu1!!4g: The site is guided mixed use (residential and neighborhood commercial). An Automotive Repair Shop will add a convenience to the area. The architectural design ofthe structure complements and blends well with surrounding buildings. b) The proposed use is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. [!gg!!4g: The proposed use is and will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area through the implementation ofthe design standards, landscaping, archilecture, etc. I c) The proposed use conforms to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. ESCjSg: The proposed use will conform to all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance such as design standards, signage, durable materials, uses, etc. d) The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. E!g@g: The proposed use is intended to meet the daily needs of the area. It could potentially add convenience to the homeowners in the area. e) The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. fug!!4g: The site is located within the Municipal Urban Service Area. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. f1 Traffrc generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. fu1!!4g: Traffic generation by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the City shall consider the development's compliance with the following: ( I ) Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation ofthe site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance ofthe neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation ofa harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visua! relationship to the development; (5) Creation offunctional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense oforder for the buildings and use on the site and provision ofa desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; 2. b. The amount and location ofopen space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression ofthe design concept and the compatibility ofthe same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring prope(ies through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation ofviews, light and air and those aspects ofdesign not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Ehdilgi The proposed development creates a harmonious relationship with existing and future buildings. It provides a compatible visual relationship. Approval of this site plan is contingent upon approval ofthe permitted uses ofthe Planned Unit Development ordinance to allow auto repair shops with standards. 6. The planning report #2020-21, dated December 1,2020, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff, et al, is incorporated herein. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Planned Unit Development Amendment to the Chanhassen Gateway PUD and Site Plan for an automotive repair shop (Building 4E). ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this l't day of December 2020. GCOPLANN SSIONCHANHASS BY: Steven Weick, Chai glplanu02o plsnning cases\20-2 I 894 I crossroads blvd (christiai bros automotive)Vevised documents I G3o-2ovindings of fa.t approval doc J RECOMMENDATION 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Chanhassen Gateway Planned Unit Development Design Standards in its entirety as follows: CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PUD DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a MIXED USE PUD including a Neighborhood Commercial, office and Residential. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive development. Each structure proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The Neighborhood Business District regulations shall apply to Lots 1- 3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Crossroads of Chanhassen , except as modified by this ordinance. The R-16 District regulations shall apply to Outlot C, except as modified by this ordinance. Exhibit A, as revised herein to reflect the changes to the commercial portion, reflects the site layout and buildings as referenced herein. 2 b. Permitted Uses • The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with meeting the daily needs of the neighborhood. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to whether or not a use meets the definition, the Community Development Director shall make that interpretation. The type of uses to be provided on these lots shall be low intensity neighborhood oriented retail and service establishments to meet daily needs of residents. Commercial and office uses shall be limited to the area located south of Highway 212. Residential uses shall be located north of Highway 212 and along the western portion of the southern half. • Small to medium-sized restaurant-not to exceed 8,000 square feet per building. Fast food restaurants with a drive-thru is limited along the north end of Building 4B. It must be part of and attached to the multi-use building. The drive-thru lane shall be screened and the exterior wall of the drive-thru shall contain the same level of architectural detail as any other elevation visible by the public. • Banks with a drive-in service window • Office • Day care • Neighborhood scale commercial up to 8,000 square feet per tenant with the exception of building 4C. A tenant may occupy up to 10,000 square feet of said building and building 4G for a daycare to occupy 12,000 square feet. No individual service component of a retail building shall occupy more than 8,000 square feet of a building. • Convenience store with or without gas pumps and car wash. • Specialty retail (Book Store, Jewelry, Sporting Goods Sale/Rental, Retail Sales, Retail Shops, Apparel Sales, etc.) • Personal Services (an establishment or place of business primarily engaged in providing individual services generally related to personal needs, such as a Tailor Shop, Shoe Repair, Self-Service Laundry, Laundry Pick-up Station, Dry Cleaning, Dance Studios, etc). • Residential High Density (8-16 units per net acre). The total number of units for the entire site may not exceed 150 units. • Automotive Repair Shop on Lot 3, Block 1, with the following standards: o No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on-premises except in appropriately designed and screened storage areas. o All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance of vehicles shall occur within closed building except minor maintenance including, but not limited to, tire inflation, adding oil and wiper replacement. o No public address system. o No sales, storage or display of used automobiles or other vehicles such as motorcycles, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles. o Disposal of vehicle fluids shall comply with PCA regulations. o Facilities for the collection of waste oil must be provided. o All service/garage doors shall be screened. o The building architecture shall complement surrounding buildings." c. Building Area • Commercial/Office – Not to exceed 75,000 square feet for the entire development • Maximum Commercial/Office lot usage is a Floor Area Ratio of 0.3 3 • Maximum office/commercial building area per tenant may not exceed 8,000 square feet • Maximum residential units may not exceed 150 units. d. Prohibited Ancillary Uses • Drive-thru Windows except banks, coffee shops, fast food restaurants or pharmacies. • Outdoor storage and display of merchandise such as propane, salt, window washer fluid, etc. except on the sidewalk surrounding the convenience store 4A. The outdoor display of merchandise shall not impede nor interfere with pedestrian traffic. e. Setbacks The PUD ordinance requires setbacks from roadways and exterior property lines. The following table displays those setbacks. Boundary Building/ Parking Setbacks (feet) Lyman Boulevard 20/20 Highway 101 North of Highway 212 50/50 Highway 101 South of Highway 212 20/20 Highway 212 50/50 Northerly Project Property Line 50/20 Westerly Project Property Line 50/20 Internal Project property lines 0/0 Internal Right-of-Way (Crossroads Boulevard) 20/20 Hard Surface Coverage-Residential 50 % Commercial and Office Hard Surface Coverage 70 % Maximum Commercial (Retail) Building/Structure Height 1 story Maximum Office Building/Structure Height 2 stories Maximum Residential Building/Structure Height 35 or 3 stories, whichever is less f. Non-Residential Building Materials and Design There shall not be underdeveloped backsides of buildings. All elevations shall receive nearly equal treatment and visual qualities. Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXIII. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. g. Residential Standards Buildings and site design shall comply with design standards outlined in Article XXIII. General Supplemental Regulations, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 1. All units shall have access onto an interior private street. 4 2. A design palette shall be approved for the entire project. The palette shall include colors for siding, shakes, shutters, shingles, brick, stone, etc. 3. All foundation walls shall be screened by landscaping or retaining walls. h. Site Landscaping and Screening The intent of this section is to improve the appearance of vehicular use areas and property abutting public rights-of-way; to require buffering between different land uses; and to protect, preserve and promote the aesthetic appeal, character and value of the surrounding neighborhoods; to promote public health and safety through the reduction of noise pollution, air pollution, visual pollution and glare. 1. The landscaping standards shall provide for screening for visual impacts associated with a given use, including but not limited to, truck loading areas, trash storage, parking lots, Large unadorned building massing, etc. 2. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 3. All open spaces and non-parking lot surfaces, except for plaza areas, shall be landscaped, rockscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. Tree wells shall be included in pedestrian areas and plazas. 4. Undulating berms, north of Lyman Boulevard, north and south of Highway 312 and west of Highway 101 shall be sodded or seeded at the conclusion of grading and utility construction. The required buffer landscaping may be installed where it is deemed necessary to screen any proposed development. All required boulevard landscaping shall be sodded. 5. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing walls may be required where deemed appropriate. 6. Native species shall be incorporated into site landscaping, whenever possible. i. Street Furnishings Benches, kiosks, trash receptacles, planters and other street furnishings should be of design and materials consistent with the character of the area. Wherever possible, street furnishings should be consolidated to avoid visual clutter and facilitate pedestrian movement. j. Signage The intent of this section is to establish an effective means of communication in the development, maintain and enhance the aesthetic environment and the business’s ability to attract sources of economic development and growth, to improve pedestrian and traffic safety, to minimize the possible adverse effect of signs on nearby public and private property, and to enable the fair and consistent enforcement of these sign regulations. It is the intent of this section, to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community by regulating signs that are intended to communicate to the public, and to use signs which meet 5 the city's goals: a. Establish standards which permit businesses a reasonable and equitable opportunity to advertise their name and service; b. Preserve and promote civic beauty, and prohibit signs which detract from this objective because of size, shape, height, location, condition, cluttering or illumination; c. Ensure that signs do not create safety hazards; d. Ensure that signs are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that does not adversely impact public safety or unduly distract motorists; e. Preserve and protect property values; f. Ensure signs that are in proportion to the scale of, and are architecturally compatible with, the principal structures; g. Limit temporary commercial signs and advertising displays which provide an opportunity for grand opening and occasional sales events while restricting signs which create continuous visual clutter and hazards at public right-of-way intersections. j.1. Project Identification Sign One project identification sign for the commercial portion of the development located at the entrance off of Highway 101. Project identification signs shall not exceed 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight feet in height. The sign shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. As an alternative, the project identification sign may be located at the southeast corner of Lot 2, Block 1. If the sign is located in the right-of-way, an encroachment agreement must be obtained. Otherwise, the sign must maintain a 10 foot setback from property lines and may not exceed 24 square feet nor be higher than 5 feet. j.2. Monument Sign One monument sign shall be permitted at the entrance to the development off of Lake Susan Drive. One monument sign per lot shall be permitted for the commercial portion of the site. One multi-tenant sign shall be permitted at the entrance into the development off of Highway 101 and two signs off of Lyman Boulevard. These signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than 5 feet in height except Kwik Trip, located on Lot 1, Block 1, shall be permitted a 48 square-foot, 8-foot high monument sign. These signs must comply with all ordinances pertaining to size and percent of sign area dedicated to gas prices as well as any other applicable regulations. These signs shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. j.3. Wall Signs 6 a. The location of letters and logos shall be restricted to the approved building sign bands, the tops of which shall not extend above parapet height. The letters and logos shall be restricted to a maximum of 30 inches in height. All individual letters and logos comprising each sign shall be constructed of wood, metal, or translucent facing. b. Second story illuminated signs that can be viewed from neighborhoods outside the PUD site, are prohibited. c. Tenant signage shall consist of store identification only. Copy is restricted to the tenant’s proper name and major product or service offered. Corporate logos, emblems and similar identifying devices are permitted provided they are confined within the signage band and do not occupy more than 15% of the sign area unless the logo is the sign. d. Wall signs are limited to two elevations per building. j.4. Festive Flags/Banners a. Flags and banners shall be permitted on approved standards attached to the building facade and on standards attached to pedestrian area lighting. b. Flags and banners shall be constructed of fabric or vinyl. c. Banners shall not contain advertising for individual users, businesses, services, or products. d. Flags and banners shall project from buildings a maximum of two feet. e. Flags and banners shall have a maximum area of 10 square feet. f. Flags and banners which are torn or excessively worn shall be removed at the request of the city. j.5. Building Directory a. In multi-tenant buildings, one building directory sign may be permitted. The directory sign shall not exceed eight square feet. j.6 Directional Signs a. On-premises signs shall not be larger than four (4) square feet. The maximum height of the sign shall not exceed five (5) feet from the ground. The placement of directional signs on the property shall be so located such that the sign does not adversely affect adjacent properties (including site lines or confusion of adjoining ingress or egress) or the general appearance of the site from public rights-of-way. No more than four (4) signs shall be allowed per lot. The city council may allow additional signs in situations where access is confusing or traffic safety could be jeopardized. b. Off-premises signs shall be allowed only in situations where access is confusing and traffic safety could be jeopardized or traffic could be inappropriately routed through residential 7 streets. The size of the sign shall be no larger than what is needed to effectively view the sign from the roadway and shall be approved by the city council. c. Bench signs are prohibited except at transit stops as authorized by the local transit authority. d. Signs and Graphics. Wherever possible, traffic control, directional and other public signs should be consolidated and grouped with other street fixtures and furnishings to reduce visual clutter and to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian movement. A system of directional signs should also be established to direct traffic within the commercial area and away from residential areas. j.7. Prohibited Signs • Pylon signs are prohibited. • Back lit awnings are prohibited. • Window Signs are prohibited except for company logo/symbol and not the name. Such logo shall not exceed 10% of a window area. • Menu Signs are prohibited. j.8. Sign Design and Permit Requirements a. The sign treatment is an element of the architecture and thus should reflect the quality of the development. The signs should be consistent in color, size, and material and height throughout the development. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. b. All signs require a separate sign permit. c. Wall business signs shall comply with the city’s sign ordinance for the Neighborhood business district for determination of maximum sign area. Wall signs may be permitted on the “street” front and primary parking lot front of each building. k. Lighting 1. Lighting for the interior of the development shall be consistent throughout the development. High pressure sodium vapor lamps or LED with decorative natural colored pole shall be used throughout the development parking lot area for lighting. Decorative, pedestrian scale lighting shall be used in plaza and sidewalk areas and may be used in parking lot areas. Parking lot light poles may not exceed 25 feet in height. 2. Light fixtures in areas other than parking lots should be kept to a pedestrian scale (12 to 18 feet). Street light fixtures should accommodate vertical banners for use in identifying the commercial area. 3. All light fixtures shall be shielded. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than ½ foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 4. Lighting for parking areas shall minimize the use of lights on pole standards in the parking area. Rather, emphasis should be placed on building lights and poles located in close proximity to 8 buildings. l. Non-Residential Parking 1. Parking shall be provided based on the shared use of parking areas whenever possible. Cross access easements and the joint use of parking facilities shall be protected by a recorded instrument acceptable to the city. 2. The development shall be treated as an integrated shopping center and provide a minimum of one space per 200 square feet of commercial/retail area. The office/personal service component shall be treated as an integrated office building and provide 4.5 space per 1,000 square feet for the first 49,999 square feet, four per thousand square feet for the second 50,000 square feet, and 3.5 per thousand square feet thereafter. m. Residential Parking shall comply with city code requirements.” Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this -----th day of October, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Heather Johnston, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The purpose of this ordinance is to amend the Planned Unit Development for Gateway of Chanhassen to allow an automotive repair shop with standards. A printed copy of Ordinance No. _____ is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the office of the City Manager/Clerk. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION this 14th day of December, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen. (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ) g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-21 8941 crossroads blvd (christian bros automotive)\revised documents 10-30-20\summary ordinance.doc kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 4197 September 4, 2020 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attention: Sharmeen Al-Jaff, City Planner RE: Proposed Christian Brothers Automotive – Project Narrative Christian Brothers Automotive is requesting the proposed site to be considered for approval within the existing PUD. The parcel is legally described as: Lot 3, Block 1, Crossraods of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. Proposed Development Overview Christian Brothers Automotive is proposing to construct an approximately 5,100 SF, 9 -bay automotive repair center located at 8941 Crossroads Boulevard in Chanhassen. The customer facing portion of the building will face the internal road of the Crossroads of Chanhassen development. The proposed development is within the Crossroads of Chanhassen PUD which was approved in 2008. The two lots east of the proposed site have been previously developed as retail and a gas station/convenience store, a child care facility is located to the south and west of the proposed site, and the rest of the PUD is currently undeveloped. Proposed Concept Plan & Development Stage Christian Brothers Automotive is proposing an amendment to the existing planned unit development (PUD). The PUD is designated as mixed use PUD including neighborhood commercial, office and residential. Christian Brothers provides light automotive repair and the scope of repairs provided by Christian Brothers has been included within the submittal package. Overnight parking only occurs when customers have a conflict retrieving their vehicle during business hours or to drop off their vehicles. Long term exterior storage is not permitted at Christian Brothers Automotive. Consultants: Civil Engineer – Christian Jones, Brandon R. Elegert, P.E. – Kimley-Horn Architecture – Dana King – Cortland Morgan Architect Landscape Architecture – Evergreen Design Group, Inc. – Rodney McNabb Photometrics – City Lighting Products Company – Mike Hohl Page 2 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 4197 Site Design The site currently vacant land with water and sanitary sewer utilities provided as part of the Crossroads of Chanhassen Development to the south. Gas, communications, and electric utilities are provided to the west along Crossroads Boulevard. The proposed building is to be located at the western edge of the site angled parallel to Crossroads Boulevard, with the customer facing side of the building internal to the development. The surface parking will be located directly east of the building. Access is proposed to be east of the building and at both the north and south side of the parking lot, with two proposed driveways connecting the internal roads of the Crossroads of Chanhassen. The existing site is currently vegetated with no impervious area; the proposed site will be comprised of approximately 70% impervious area. Above ground and underground stormwat er management will be provided adhering to City and Watershed treatment and rate control requirements. Architecture Architectural elevations and site photometric plans are provided within the submission. The proposed building is to be constructed of primarily brick and limestone. The trash enclosure is also to be constructed in materials similar to the building and will have gates to screen the trash from the public right-of-way. Landscape Architecture A landscape plan is included within the submission to comply with the city code. Trees, shrubs, and other plantings will complement the site. Christian Brothers Automotive is seeking a landscape variance for screening of the vehicular area. Please contact me at (763) 251-1016 or christian.jones@kimley-horn.com should you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Christian Jones Project Manager This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCOVER SHEETC0.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBRENORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY, MN 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ANSI FULL BLEED D (34.00 X 22.00 INCHES) SHEET. 3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT EVERGREEN DESIGN GROUP, INC. PO BOX 2193 GARNER, NC 27529 TELEPHONE: (800) 680-6630 FAX: (866) 579-8452 CONTACT: RODNEY MCNABB PROJECT TEAM: SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 1229 TAYLOR STREET NE, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE: (612) 466-3300 CONTACT: ERIC ROESER ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 OWNER / DEVELOPER CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE 17725 KATY FREEWAY HOUSTON, TX 77094 TELEPHONE: (281) 675-6120 CONTACT: JONATHAN WAKEFIELD CONTACT: JACOB STEELE EMAIL: JACOB.STEELE@CBAC.COM 8941 CROSSROADS BLVD SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 116N, RANGE 23W FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call ARCHITECT CORTLAND MORGAN ARCHITECT 711 N. FIELDER ROAD ARLINGTON, TX 76012 TELEPHONE: (817) 635-5699 FAX: (817) 635-5699 CONTACT: DANA KING CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE LYMAN BLVD US H W Y 2 1 2 DRAWING INDEX SHEET NO.SHEET TITLE C0.0 COVER SHEET C0.1 GENERAL NOTES C0.2 ALTA SURVEY C1.0 DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL - PH.1 PLAN C1.1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C2.0 SITE PLAN C2.1 SITE DETAILS C2.2 SITE DETAILS C3.0 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PH. 2 PLAN C3.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS C4.0 UTILITY PLAN C4.1 UTILITY DETAILS This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGENERAL NOTESC0.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREGENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 3.THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 4.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 7.ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 8.ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10.ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 11.ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 13.SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: - PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES 3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: - DENSITY TEST REPORTS - BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM - PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER - LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS - ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2.ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4.DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5.ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6.WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7.ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8.UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACK FILLING. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES. 11.IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12.ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14.TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 15.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17.ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18.ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20.THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21.A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22.GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26.REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1.GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5.BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7.AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8.WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10.IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11.FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12.ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14.SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATION. 17.ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18.SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19.LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20.IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22.BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23.ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24.ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25.ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 26.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4.SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5.TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8.ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. 9.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12.ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE. 13.ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY. 14.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 15.EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT. 16.ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ENGINEERING DIVISION. 17.IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION. 1.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 3.THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 4.THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 5.ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1.ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2.ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4.ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5.THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6.ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7.THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9.ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10.BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11.MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORALTA SURVEYC0.28941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBRENOT TO SCALE EXISTING SIGN TO BE REMOVED 921 921 922 922 922922923924921 922 923924924924921922 9231.70%1.00% 2.26 %1.17%0.30%3.69%2.89 %0.82% 1.4 5 %4.51% 0.86% 2.35 %1.75%A A A A50.0'20.0' PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING 8" PVC SANITARY SEWERPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING 10" DIP WATERMAIN PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING 27" HDPE SANITARY SEWERCROSSROADS BOULEVARDPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITIES (TYP.)SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFPROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREE (TYP.) PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREES, (TYP.) PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREE (TYP.) PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TREES AND PLANTER, TYP. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM SEWER 4. 6 8 % SF SF SFSFREMOVE STUB TO MAIN, CAP PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORDEMOLITION ANDEROSIONCONTROL - PH.1PLANC1.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBRE1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK. 6.ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK. 7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY AND MN/DOT. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13.REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS. 14.ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES. 15.IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 16.IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES NORTH KEYNOTE LEGEND INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE A B LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (OFFSET FOR CLARITY) REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1.ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 3.WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 4.ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 6.ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 7.REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 9.IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. 10.IN THE EVENT OF FROZEN SOILS, THE GC MAY UTILIZE BIO LOG. THE GC IS TO PROHIBIT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE. 11.A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING SHALL BE HELD AT CITY HALL WITH THE ENGINEERING DIVISION AND EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. A PLAN SHOWING HAUL ROUTES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL AT THIS MEETING AS OUTLINED IN THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS. 2.CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUT PIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE. 3.PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4.PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING. ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 5.START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 6.TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF CHANHASSEN GRADING PERMIT. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: PH I BMP QUANTITIES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE ±290 LF INLET PROTECTION 4 EA. SITE DATA TABLE TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 0.80 AC TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 0.94 AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.01 AC EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 0.79 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.55 AC PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 0.25 AC EXISTING TREE PROTECTION Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call PREPARED FOREROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL DETAILSC1.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-EROS DETAILS.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:11pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION1 3B 3A 4 5 2 1.PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING BLANKETS, INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED. 2.BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE BLANKET IN A 6" DEEP X 6" WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. 3.ROLL THE BLANKETS (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. BLANKETS WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATION. 4.THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 4"-6" OVERLAP DEPENDING ON BLANKET TYPE. TO ENSURE PROPER SEAM ALIGNMENT, PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 5.CONSECUTIVE BLANKETS SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE 3"OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12"APART ACROSS ENTIRE BLANKET WIDTH. 6.PLACE STAPLES/STAKES PER MANUFACTURE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE APPROPRIATE SLOPE BEING APPLIED. NOTES: 1.IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. 2.FOLLOW EROSION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL SPECIFICATION FOR PRODUCT SELECTION 4"- 6" 6"6"12" 3" N.T.S. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET2 TREE PROTECTION N.T.S. N.T.S. TREE PROTECTION1 FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY CROSSROADS BOULEVARDCCPROPOSED CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE ±5,100 SF FFE: 923.00'26.0'26.0'9.0'TYP.18.0'18.0'9.0' TYP.9.0'TYP.EX. 20' BUILDING AND PARKING SETBACK PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA BB C D H F F F G G G G EX. PROPERTY LINE EX. 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EX. PROPERTY LINE 10.0' A A E 26.0' 8 16 2 5 G B B 18 . 0 ' 16 . 0 ' 20. 0 ' PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN SEE ARCH PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD EX. LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN 5.0'14.5'22 . 0 ' 21.0'6.0'∆=55°42'56" R=270.00' L=262.55' CB=N28°21'12"E C=252.33' S55°34'14"E 96.19' S0°00'00"E 170.67' N90°00'00"W 199.20' 26 . 0 ' PROPOSED 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT10.0'20.0'PROPOSED COMPACT PARKING STALL 56.1'30 . 3 ' K KK PR. "NO PARKING" SIGN PR. STOP SIGN PR. STOP SIGN DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREBUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 34,691 SF (0.80 AC) BUILDING AREA 5,100 SF (14.7% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PUD ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM HARD SURFACE COVERAGE 34,691 SF * 70% =24,284 SF PROPOSED HARD SURFACE COVERAGE 23,656 SF PARKING REQUIRED PARKING 22 SPACES PROPOSED PARKING 31 SPACES ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 2 STALLS / 2 STALLS EXISTING OVERALL PUD PARKING 247 SPACES PROPOSED OVERALL PUD PARKING 278 SPACES PROPERTY SUMMARY 8941 CROSSROADS BLVD ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED ZONING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PARKING SETBACKS CROSSROADS BLVD = 20' INTERNAL PROJECT ROADS = 0' BUILDING SETBACKS CROSSROADS BLVD = 20' INTERNAL PROJECT ROADS = 0' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA LEGEND KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN WITH BOLLARD ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT TACTILE WARNINGS A B C D E F G H I J K This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:12pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH PREPARED FORSITE PLANC2.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNPROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R PREPARED FORSITE DETAILSC2.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE DETAILS.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:12pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION9'9'9'18.0'(PER PLAN) HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGN 4" PAINTED WHITE STRIPING 4" WHITE STRIPE AT 2'-0" O.C. NOTE: REFER TO PLAN FOR DETAILED LAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS CURB AND GUTTER "NO PARKING" SIGN, CENTERED AT HEAD OF SPACE, 2' MIN. AND 8' MAX FROM FACE OF CURB. NO SIGN REQUIRED IF THE SIGN OBSTRUCTS A CURB RAMP OR PEDESTRIAN ROUTE. NO PARKING PAINT THE WORDS "NO PARKING" WITHIN EACH 9'-0" ACCESS AISLE WHERE SHOWN USE 12" MINIMUM HIGH WHITE LETTERS HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGN 1/2"6"12" FIN. GRADE60"-66"'18"WHITE SYMBOL ON BLUE BACKGOUND LEGEND & BORDER: WHITE BACKGROUND: BLUE NOTES: 1.ALL LETTERS ARE 1" AERIES "C" PER MUTCD. 2.SIGN SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENGINEERING GRADE) BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE REFLECTORIZED LEGEND AND BORDER. 3.FINE NOTIFICATION SIGN SHALL HAVE A REFLECTORIZED (ENGINEERING GRADE) WITH WHITE LEGEND AND BORDER. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY FINE AMOUNT. 5.ONE(1) SIGN REQUIRED FOR EACH PARKING SPACE. 6.INSTALLED HEIGHT OF SIGN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 24-23 OF THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. 7.ALL ACCESSIBLE FEATURES TO BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A STANDARDS AND LOCAL LAWS. SIGNAGE K-1479 12"x6" PLAQUE TYPICAL AT ALL VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PARKING VEHICLE ID REQUIRED UP TO $200 FINE FOR VIOLATION 2'-9"3'-0"WHITE LEGEND RED BACKGROUND30"30" CURB TAPER B612 CURB AND GUTTER TR A N S I T I O N LE N G T H V A R I E S SE E P L A N 20" PAVEMENT SECTIONS ARE PROVIDED AS A COURTESY ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL PAVEMENT, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS 7" 4,000 PSI CONCRETE PER MNDOT 2301 4" AGGREGATE BASE PER MNDOT CLASS V IN SECTION 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETAIL N.T.S. PAVEMENT DETAILS (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)7 N.T.S. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE3 N.T.S. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL4 N.T.S. ADA ACCESS AISLE NO PARKING6N.T.S. TYPICAL ACCESSIBLE STALL PARKING5 N.T.S. CONCRETE CURB TRANSITION8 N.T.S. R1-1 30"X30" "STOP" SIGN9 1.5" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE PER MNDOT 2360 MVWE35035B PR. MNDOT SPEC 2357 TACK COAT 1.5" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE PER MNDOT 2360 MVNW35035B 6" AGGREGATE BASE PER MNDOT CLASS V IN SECTION 3138 EX. APPROVED SUBGRADE STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT 2.0" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE PER MNDOT 2360 MVWE35035B PR. MNDOT SPEC 2357 TACK COAT 2.0" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE PER MNDOT 2360 MVNW35035B 8" AGGREGATE BASE PER MNDOT CLASS V IN SECTION 3138 EX. APPROVED SUBGRADE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT 12"Ø27"ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY4'-0" BREAK AWAY TUBE POST 3500 P.S.I. P.C. CONCRETE BASE SLOPE TOP OF CONCRETE GALVANIZED SQUARE TUBE GROUND SURFACE 5'-0" - 5'-6" (HEIGHT VARIES)NOTE: ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS SHALL BE MOUNTED 60" MIN. AND 66" INCHES MAX. ABOVE THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE. ALL OTHER SIGNS TO BE 7'-6" ABOVE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE. REQUIRED VEHICLE ID FOR VIOLATION UP TO $200 FINE SIGN TYPE PER PLAN N.T.S. SIGN POST INSTALLATION DETAIL2N.T.S. SIGN POST WITH BOLLARD INSTALLATION DETAIL1 PREPARED FORSITE DETAILSC2.28941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE DETAILS.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:12pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONFOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY DCROSSROADS BOULEVARDLP:922.21 LP:922.04 ME:921.27 ME:923.58 ME:921.95 922.00 923.00 922.87 922.25 922.16 922.25 922.40 922.19 922.05 922.23 922.50922.52 922.60 922.60 922.47 921.75 921.85 921.88 923.20 EOF:922.40 922.53 922.95 922.79 2.29%1.10%1.67%2.17% 1.37% 2.2 0 % 1.91%1.00%1.07%2.90%9 2 3 924922922922 923924922 921 921921922 922 922 922 923 922PROPOSED CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE ±5,100 SF FFE: 923.00' ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 923.00 923.00 923.00 923.00 922.95 922.89 A A A A A A B B B 50.0'20.0' B B B 1.55%1.31% 1.35 % 922.44 922.66 922.23 LP:921.85 2.44 %3.38%BP-1: STORMWATER INFILTRATION BASIN BOTTOM OF BASIN: 919.50 TOP OF BASIN: 921.50 100-YR HWL: 920.78 STORAGE VOLUME: 1,645 SF LP:922.15 10 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00% ST-17 CONNECT TO U/G INFILTRATION SYSTEM IE:917.51 W ST-18 CONNECT TO U/G INFILTRATION SYSTEM IE:917.60 SE ST-16 CONNECT TO U/G STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IE:917.92 N ST-9 CBMH W/ 3' SUMP RE:922.04 IE:917.66 W IE:917.66 E OCS-1 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE PROVIDE 6" WIDE WEIR WALL TOP OF WEIR WALL: 918.50 RE:922.56 IE:915.40 S ST-11 CB 24"X36" W/ 3' SUMP RE:921.83 IE:917.80 NW ST-8 CATCH BASIN, CONNECT TO U/G STORM SEWER RE:921.85 ST-20 CONNECT TO EX. STORM STRUCTURE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY INV. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IE:915.20 N IE: 915.40 S BMP 2: UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM ADS 36" N-12 PERFORATED HDPE PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL TOTAL STORAGE VOLUME: 6,238 CF TOP OF PIPE: 918.90 PIPE INV.: 915.90 BOTTOM OF STONE: 915.40 100-YR HWL: 918.80 ME:921.68 EOF:922.80 EOF:921.50 2. 0 0 % 2 . 5 0% 2. 6 1 % 24 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% ST-26 CORE DRILL AND CONNECT TO EX. STORM STRUCTURE PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS IE:920.96 SE 19 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.06% 56 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 922.25 ST-7 CB 27" DIA. W/ 3' SUMP RE:922.15 IE:918.20 S 56 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 31 LF - 12" HDPE @ 0.50% 922.50 922.50 922.50 922.50 923.00 923.00 A 9239 2 3 922922 92292192092 1 922922923923922923 922 ST-25 24" RISER PIPE W/ DOME GRATE TOP OVERFLOW ELEV = 921.20 IE:921.20 NW EXPOSED FOUNDATION 7.83 % EOF:920.81 ST-29 CB 27" DIA. W/ 3' SUMP RE:919.99 IE:917.94 E ADJUST RIM TO PROPOSED GRADE LP:921.95 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:12pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORGRADING,DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROLPH. 2 PLANC3.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBRENORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION 918.50 OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. 23.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 474, SECTION 1109. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION LP:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1.ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 3.WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 4.ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 6.ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 7.REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 9.IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. 10.IN THE EVENT OF FROZEN SOILS, THE GC MAY UTILIZE BIO LOG (EROS-11). THE GC IS TO PROHIBIT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE. UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1.TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE. 2.INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, UNDERGROUND SYSTEM, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 3.INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS EACH INLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED. 4.PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE. 5.PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. 6.PAVE SITE AND INSTALL STRIPING. 7.INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES. 8.COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION OVER ALL AREAS. 9.OBTAIN CONCURRENCE WITH THE CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT THAT THE SITE HAS BEEN FULLY STABILIZED THEN: 9.1.REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES. 9.2.STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL OF BMPS. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: PH II BMP QUANTITIES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE ±740 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ±1,800 SF INLET PROTECTION 9 EA. INLET PROTECTION HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET KEYNOTE LEGEND INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE A B Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R PROPERTY RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE PRE POST 10 YR 1.04 CFS 0.32 CFS 100 YR 3.69 CFS 2.38 CFS EXISTING NORTH PRIVATE ENTRANCE PRE POST 10 YR 0.23 CFS 0.13 CFS 100 YR 0.80 CFS 0.25 CFS CROSSROADS BOULEVARD PRE POST 10 YR 0.45 CFS 0.13 CFS 100 YR 1.59 CFS 2.08 CFS EXISTING INLET ONSITE PRE POST 10 YR 0.41 CFS 0.08 CFS 100 YR 1.40 CFS 0.26 CFS PREPARED FORGRADING ANDDRAINAGEDETAILSC3.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING DETAILS.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:13pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONUNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES 1.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE (2) DOUBLE RING INFILTROMETER TESTS WITHIN THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM EXCAVATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE RESULTS TO THE ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL OVER-EXCAVATE ALL TOPSOIL AND FILL AS NECESSARY TO NATIVE FREE DRAINING SOILS. EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPLACED WITH SUITABLE ENGINEERED FILL MEETING THE MNDOT SPECIFICATION FOR COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE PER SECTION 3149.2H. DEPTHS OF FILL/URBAN FILL EXPECTED TO VARY, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTHS OF EXCAVATION AND PERFORM INFILTROMETER TESTS PRIOR TO INSTALLING UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. 3.IF NATIVE SUBGRADE SOILS BELOW FILL ARE DETERMINED TO NOT BE CONDUCIVE TO THE DESIGN INFILTRATION REQUIREMENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND REPLACE THE POORLY INFILTRATING SOILS TO A DEPTH WHERE THE EXISTING NATIVE SUBGRADE SOILS MEET OR EXCEED THE DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE AS REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER. 4.UPON COMPLETION OF THE STORMWATER BMP AND FINAL STABILIATION OF THE TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THE BMP AFTER A SIGNIFICAT RAIN EVENT THAT SHOWS THE BMPS DRAWS DOWN WITHIN 48 HOURS. 5.NO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL TRAVEL WITHIN THE UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM AREA. USE EXCAVATOR WITH TOOTHED BUCKET FOR INFILTRATION BASIN EXCAVATION TO AVOID COMPACTING OR SMEARING OF SOILS. 6.FINAL EXCAVATION OF UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM AREA AND INSTALLATION OF OF ENGINEERED SOIL MUST OCCUR IN DRY SOIL CONDITIONS TO PREVENT SMEARING AND COMPACTION. DO NOT WORK IN INFILTRATION SYSTEM AREA IF SOIL CONDITIONS ARE WET. 7.IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION, THE EXCAVATION FOR THE TRENCH SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED BACKFILL MATERIAL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION, OR THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE AND OR BIO-ROLLS SUCH THAT ON-SITE SOILS DO NOT ENTER THE TRENCH EXCAVATION AND CLOG UP THE BOTTOM/SIDES OF THE TRENCH LIMITING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. 8.IF ANY SOILS ENTER THE TRENCH PRIOR TO BACKFILLING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOILS AND CONFIRM THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE NATIVE SUBGRADE SOILS IS MET WITH INFILTROMETER TESTS. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COMPLETE CERTIFIED AS-BUILT PLANS DEMONSTRATING ALL CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE STRUCTURES, AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES (INCLUDING AS-BUILT VOLUMES) CONFORM TO DESIGN AND/OR PLANS AS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 10.STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAS TO BE KEPT OFF-LINE UNTIL DISTURBED AREAS ARE RESTORED. IF NOT POSSIBLE, SYSTEMS MUST BE CLEANED OUT PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 12" HDPE, SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 24" RISER WITH DOME GRATE TOP OF GRATE: 921.20 24" STAND PIPE TOP OF POND ELEVATION: 921.50 BOTTOM OF POND ELEVATION: 919.50 N.T.S. INFILTRATION BASIN TYPICAL SECTION1 FOR REFERENCE ONLYFOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLYFOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY CROSSROADS BOULEVARDD A A F A A F E H G F D I J PR. TRANSFORMER PAD, SEE PLANS BY OTHERS FOR DETAILS K PR. GAS METER, SEE MEP PLANS FOR DETAILS A C CONNECT TO EXISTING (BY OTHERS) B L RIM: 922.55 INV: 912.08 RIM:922.74 INV: 912.51 D WYE CONNECTION INV: 912.50 REMOVE EX. 8" SANITARY SEWER STUB, CONSTRUCT PR 6" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. CONNECT AND SEAL CONNECTION PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS INV: 910.8 N INV: 910.7 W INV: 910.8 E RIM: 922.75 INV: 912.50 D CONNECT TO EXISTING (BY OTHERS) WYE CONNECTION INV: 912.08 21 LF @ 2.0% 64 LF @ 2.0% UTILITY CROSSING EX. 27" STRM BOTTOM: 912.60 6" SSWR TOP: 911.18 CLEARANCE: 1.42' WATERMAIN CROSSING, MAINTAIN 1.5' CLEARANCE 95 LF WATERMAIN CROSSING, MAINTAIN 1.5' CLEARANCE UTILITY CROSSING 12" STRM BOTTOM: 918.90 6" SSWR TOP: 911.40 CLEARANCE: 7.50' PROPOSED CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE ±5,100 SF FFE: 923.00' RIM:922.65 INV: 913.06 INV: 913.19 PR. STORM SEWER, SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR DETAILS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, SEE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR DETAILS 10.0' PR. POWER, SEE MEP PLANS FOR DETAILS PR. 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EX. 27" HDPE STORM SEWER INV: 912.71 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:13pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC4.08941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREUTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 16' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 16'-26' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3.WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5.ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10.TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19.BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20.ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21.ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. NORTH KEYNOTE LEGEND POINT OF CONNECTION, REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR CONTINUATION TAP EXISTING WITH 3 4" CORP 3/4" DOMESTIC COPPER WATER SERVICE INSTALL CLEANOUT CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE INSTALL 6" PVC SDR40 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE, LENGTH AND SLOPE PER PLAN PROPOSED GREASE INTERCEPTOR LOCATION, REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR DETAILS AND SIZING PROPOSED SAMPLING WELL, SEE PLANS BY OTHERS INSTALL ELECTRIC LINE, PLANS BY OTHERS, SEE MEP PLANS FOR CONTINUATION INSTALL COMMUNICATIONS LINE, PLANS BY OTHERS, SEE MEP PLANS FOR CONTINUATION INSTALL GAS LINE, PLANS BY OTHERS, SEE MEP PLANS FOR CONTINUATION INSTALL 3 4" CURB CORP STOP PER CITY OF CHANHASSEN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS A B C D E F G H I J K L SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R WATER CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 TELEPHONE: (952) 227-1144 FAX: (952) 227-1942 CONTACT: ASHLEY MCGOVERN SANITARY CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 TELEPHONE: (952) 227-1144 FAX: (952) 227-1942 CONTACT: ASHLEY MCGOVERN PREPARED FORUTILITY DETAILSC4.18941 CROSSROADSBLVDCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSENMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRANDON R. ELEGERT, P.E.09/04/202050387DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16068400509/04/2020AS SHOWNCJJKAMBREThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE\Chanhassen, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY DETAILS.dwg September 03, 2020 - 10:13pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSANITARY/STORM CLEAN-OUT N.T.S. N.T.S. TYPICAL CLEANOUT1 FOR REFERENCE ONLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY CROSSROADS BOULEVARDCCNORTH LEGEND EX-CCOLOR SITE PLANEXHIBIT09/18/20201606840058941 CROSSROADSBLVDPREPARED FORCHRISTIAN BROTHERSAUTOMOTIVECHANHASSEN MNBREKAMCJJAS SHOWNLANDSCAPE/GRASS PAVEMENT BUILDING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Carver County Public Works 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 Office (952) 466-5200 | Fax (952) 466-5223 | www.co.carver.mn.us CARVER COUNTY September 25, 2020 City of Chanhassen c/o Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner 952-227-1134 saljaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Re: Development / Access Review Comments: Amendment to the Chanhassen Gateway Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Conditional Use Permit for Christian Brothers Automotive at 8941 Crossroads Blvd – Located near the intersections of CSAH 101 (Great Plains Blvd.)/Crossroads Blvd. and CSAH 18 (Lyman Blvd.)/Crossroads Blvd. Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject development in the City of Chanhassen. Please reference the Public Works Development Review Process document on the County’s website for detailed instructions. The County assumes compliance with State Statute 505.03 Subdivision 2 regarding road authority review. Consistent with the County Comprehensive Plan and County Codes, the following are comments and recommended conditions of approval and potential requirements for any necessary permits to be issued for the project: 1. Impacts to County Right of Way and Access to County Highways a. The subject site is not adjacent to County right of way and no direct access to County Highways is proposed. Additional County review and approval will be required if this condition changes. 2. Traffic Impacts a. It is recommended to provide a brief traffic memo identifying changes to PUD trip generation levels, traffic patterns, or impacts to the County highway intersections of CSAH 101 (Great Plains Blvd.)/Crossroads Blvd. and CSAH 18 (Lyman Blvd.)/Crossroads Blvd. compared to the original PUD plan and traffic study. The memo should note the expected level of service at these intersections and any findings that impact future traffic operation needs. 3. Required Permits a. Prior to any work affecting or on County highways or in County right of way (none currently proposed), the applicant shall coordinate plans with the County Engineer and obtain a Utility or Excavating/Filling/Grading Permit(s) from Carver County Public Works: (http://www.co.carver.mn.us/how-do-i/apply-for/a-permit). Final details of locations, grades, and profiles affecting County roads as well as any utility connections will need to be reviewed and approved prior to any permits. b. Any damages, modifications, or changes incurred on County highways from current or approved conditions will need to remedied or updated at development expense, including costs incurred by the County. These are the County’s comments at this time. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact staff noted below: Joan Guthmiller Administrative Technician Carver County Public Works 952.466.5201 jguthmiller@co.carver.mn.us Angie Stenson AICP Sr. Transportation Planner Carver County Public Works 952.466.5273 astenson@co.carver.mn.us Dan McCormick, P.E. PTOE Traffic Services Supervisor Carver County Public Works 952.466.5208 dmccormick@co.carver.mn.us CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( ss. COLNTYOFCARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 19,2020, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City ofChanhassen' Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy ofthe attached notice ofa Public Hearing to consider a request for an amendment to the chanhassen Gateway PUD to allow Automotive Repair Shops; and an amendment to the Crossroads of chanhassen site Plan with variances for the construction of a 51100 sf automotive repair shop @uilding 4E) located at 8941 Crossroads Boulevard. Zoned Planned Unit Development @UD). Planning Case No. 2020-21to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses ofsuch ownets were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Kim T. Meuwissen, Deputy Cl Subscribed and swom to be me JEAiI M SIECI(LJI{G ilmry n..Io.ilfnt€.ota ry*i3rar..Lltr,r@1 t thisRlh day of 2020. Notary Public (Seal) :2 Disclaiire, This map is rErther a legally rccorded map nor a survey and is not intendd lo be used as one. This map is a comFilaton of reco.ds, informatron and data located in various city, county, state and tederal offices and other sources regading the area shown and is to be ud for refeence purposs only The City does not wanant thal the Geographic lniormatbn System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are eror free, ancl the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navioatjonal. tracking or any other Durpose requidng exacting measurement of distance or dareclion or precision in the depiction of geoOhphic features. The prerceding disclaimer is provided pu6uant to Minnesota stalutes s466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and lhe uger of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damag€s, and expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, andemnify. and hold hamless the City ftom any and all daams blought by User, its employees or agents. or third parties which ads€ out of the use/s access or use of data provrded. <TAX_NAMEI cTAX_ADD-LI r cTAX_ADD_L2l (Next RecordD(TAX-NA lEr I<TAX_ADD_Llr ITAX_ADD_L2r This map is nejther a leoally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to b€ used as one. This mep is a compilaton of records, informatlon and data located in vaious crty, county, state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to b€ used for reference purposes only. The Crty does not wanant that the Geographic lniormaton System (GlS) Data used to prepare tiis map are enor free. and the City does not represenl thal the GIS Oata can be used for navigat,onal, t acking or any other purpose requiring exactng measurernenl of distance or directon or precision in the deprcton ol geographic features. The preceding d6daamer is provrded pulsuant to Minnesota Stat es y66.03. Subd. 21 (2000), and tne user of this map acknowledge5 Ulat tie City shall not be liaue for any damages, and e)Q.essly waives all daims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold hamless lhe Crty from any and allclaims b.ought by User, its employees or agents. or thard partres whici atise out of the use/s acaess or use of dala provided. rv ID I ;E-.tI F-: -J .. tl. EI I z -J . .r :":ri.:--7 I .- ti r I o, E .: -q E P EI .2 F E cioIF. (! oNoN '-; o) -o Eoo IDotoE o)fF 2(I) !) o ooF.F- u; tu.o E o c oo (!r o olc o Eo. -9o o,)o .>c5rF SE ca :c(!< : r! h }EEE€ O ., YE s! gEs otl Q o_-;?xesk >, --, I ar EX:fE66: E:39EE:; T€ EP-.e* 6; I 9E c E I rE;!: 6 o ;a E (acorlrr Ee5 4ii!.=-E':b 88ts tr EEO(, o E 6q) rn'6 o 06 c oI -9 Ev q) .g o 06 o o! EY ,.:o .>c] .iU'9 6E i9. oo op uJoeE'oo NO ,!D o cob9o AcYOot loor-@< EiE€ Elo:Y lo6 tq-o-c- Y. ar0 cDE .!1 ;r'6 I 9i5 ;o c E oo F>org od iF-cir o = oE- rJ tt*.l'= € Ee 4 EEE E ^+ -dr ^L c O- -Y :EE-pe E + e E; HE:i.A;94i"9.96!! riEqEsaS rEa-gs= H : E EtE sE t E' : s iE:8-E Eo-o *E t HE.9 iE:TEE5Ee339..F O (! OF N (Y) \t EDE 0,o E .9 .!2 E Eoo .'''- E!c o o i,$ilE$tE EiEiriEEE sP a Ed.33E =':.,lB =.!e rrb lll BE; a-EEEEtt! ;aeltflatE; :.eIIE EI $E€ u;oocoq) (g o)oc- BoEg EE:g La6.>Eoo0) O^cE XE.(tr 6_9 cr(0ol'6o oU OE.>t3pE6 eEo-;fEcEODL @P =_9fiPzii l oi'-o o o) E 'aoc fc Ec 0) (5.cc GEq 6 ==; z E ! a 3 I t*Effis:EtiiE gEltIiEgggEilEEi liisEi;e:iiiEEaffEa (, .EF oa, o t!o Eo t!(,oJ oo CI iio ;o EoiLor >trr.9 o.Geto-J 9glt d, .= *'E r! .c }E c6 ..o9trcO{, 6=rl, E3Ooo 6c oo =gro ,=o EC -LE.9oEo5E'G.S bE 0, l!.9dot2g ot! c!! o C'c alto = .P.E r!o(, '= -E(JE =on ri ^t gt otr .sE:q 2=" oooEEt!Eo ,9 o Ic 6;.Yo eE x oo>oo.. r! llor€ o E9 r3 a B_aE i9E E€ ExP g t1iooFU)'=06 .! (! sE€E.:g O, rJ o ;E t* 5:Ei9P96 AEtr.StEie 5.= 3 e eE 3?a1E 6 +\(Jc P *eE - 65 0 Bq oS:<(!- ]J O-cE 3E =aO !.r3E-c EtB Rlfr 31.!D;l cr t ZlE s El0'o El clo,old E HI€> -al l., El o E EI€'dq9 b.Et b.,.l P ailH = o o .9e cn .E Q' o, E q,a Io o) co I o(, o (li o = F-(\l 6t (\t o (s q) o- -e oI t co o c G q @tso .I o G (, Eo q,(, E .9 .9 E Eoo '= Eo o. (,E o oE o o'6 o .6 o o,)! (E Y -.i 2d)d a .9.PBoLi .9. (-) o OE ur '6 e.fr'ooEiqo 6:cob9aqe YOoE .o< o{E* E;xo =x=-:ilt B* € iis rlH , fi €EeaaeEE O - ;jg ! . O--Y EiEg€E;riETE AEE{ E; s+ E sEgo65 9IE I o.9;.56tori.!Q6;OEE( Ei BH= cE t = d:<E q F€d.e=.e6F6do o-o-o F G a! O-- N (t t E _9 F E cio9F. (!oNoN o)-o E(l)o o)o;o! q)aF L p E -e !2m o (E =ooF.F. o.o Eo o c oo (nI o .=s E N! i* =EI OELL odF6 -;;NSEio O- r).c t o:oca:; =9EE:bqE0'nz>+(E ot - hN=* o 6*. EE9Eg;a E - o,c:coofo-c Q (6 E(D ffi,::!.E<:o AEo 6tro.r) o qp o o '6 o o .9. o) 'E(!o o c) o. J o F G f o- c o) o (,)o 1 q) (!'6 o 06 oI -9 ,EY o.lc.q o (l) E oc lc EE o.) o-cE([ Eq o oo C) '-- -ooi -u, '6 It).c o o o,a,oooa Eo oIt)p !E rt, o) f .E E ui {) o(lt o, co'- (5 E oc o) !Eo (5 E o) o '6 oo o =c.9 U) =uJz o = ; lioac n)o)o o,c n)o E E 0)E = a -,; g€EEp Ei EP ;EEIEEE;iEE:; :*EESgBEEtEiiE E?tEitIlErigEE;:E E IIBJ:: H;:€ €$i '-:f:;ia;;eEI rg EE eEfE FEE$i EiEEEiiEEEiEEE EEE B?eEEEEEEEE EEtEEiEi3AgEiEE ;sEig€Eigte;EEE E € 3 q E z I E 6 : 5 a E ! ; I E ! E 6 !6 ..o9ECoo o=OE3Ogo €o o otr;o Eocto G >;tsoa, 'E cL a!eto-J qa o.=o. !l r'E o.€ =E id i: o5 0, clo o (,() oJ l!ooco G ,qo o ::t!6orLo o. ,9o o ooQQQnQO9OQe)e)OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOc)c,c|.{ d !t @ o) o o .\. .n < Ln O'r O ..,r m !^ or sl r^ @ F\ oO m .{ r^ (o F\ co 6 O H - m - r^ 6 - - <'iO o rn o o (o N o F{ d d q, n n !r Q !r':r i n d d O O o o o 6 6 i H i i ; - H o d ; rrQ Q Q <) I .r F{ Q O O a Cf o o o o o O O O o <) o O O O 6 6 o o o O O c) o o - o <) c)ce (D i. t t m + 0Q Q' a a a rg st st sr 9 <r sl q <t rr F- F. T. F. F F F F- F. l< F |< F F F F F F.!o sl @ co o .! .{ st 0o to .o oo a @ q) q, oo !9 ao @ co 60 <t <t 6 co .o 6 @ .o oo .o .o 6 6 6 <t (o (o io - \ ry E Q, a Q, Ql ry r- F: .: r: c] a a Q F. o o o o o ca o0 d !r d ai n - - ti - - - ;i .a F. F F = !^v'!t4 4 '4 ul 14 '4 rrl {r {r !n L,ll.rarnI^ ln !/1 !^ !^ rr1 rnI^rn !n .^ !^ !^ r^ !,r rn Ln !^ !n !^ !a !/) i-o in6- at a{ .! .!.! ^t .{ a\l .\t r\ N.!.r N a{ a\ N a\t N a\.!.! N ^i o-d6- t^ t^ a \^ t^ tA t^ t^ t^ tA.^ a 8 8IOEG,G,GG,G,.tC,GGEG,OOO66OOOO6OO lrJ tr.r r!a t^ t^.^ (,(9(, ! rrr-riiiiiii === SSSSSeeHHHHHggggsuuohhh 5 3 5 5 64443 3 3 3 ????€ E E = ; ; =E*8F, 9, z 222 22 2 2 2 2 ) ) ) ) zl I I EEEEH=I55EE565EEEEE=999 rn ln 6 r,t rn i H .r .t m an rf (6{o6Hdirndrn {o F\ ao cD o !n lar.n !n 6 6 !,t r./l !n r^ 6 Llt 6 dr dr di inF\ F\ l\ f,\ F- 0o @ 0o.O @ @.O @.a o0 o.o co - 6 6 6 6 6 6066(^6666JJJ<!!!l!! &d,d,c,a>5>Y>=>9f,:)f ororoo *q6; q:= JTO=FF- 3;""y,t<iiQQ3P=66.IALEE 8:EApp<(^oduol.uo!^r^oo =@or(Dsld(^\D6oF-F- F$ E$. $E gg P EEHSH H HE *S.r (n TFFF..: or o! c. 00o@6@ oo ++ "g ","i r- .t n 9X N N N !? F\ \ F\ F. <r F\ r'\ r.\ r- F i r- n r.. r'. i * F N Fl r- * r.. r.<t <t vro.iYdddrr id;iiiiiHA a m (o @ q:.n o.n S.nm m rn.n.n ri.n.n !') an m rn .n lYl m.n.n.n m., m m.n.n rn .n mfl s 3 _ 3 ; x 4 I S S ti S B S 3 S 3 S * * S S S S S S * n 3 S * S S 3 B n $ S * = = i fr fr * H = ================================^ g 4 B : : 2 i !, i a i 4 a i i i i_ i i i i i i i i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 2 i 2 i i i :,= = ? = = = = nvvv F H H E uivuafrfrvvavahvavvauuuva-sa E r r 3. s s j j { i f i E i + f + r s + s f s + + s + + $ s $ $ + s f $ + + + f $-tz z; ttt t^ < < z Z Z z z z z z z 2 z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z 2 - Z = - = =<O Or I rF r- = I - -= I rI - O - I I I I - -- I r r - r r II r r - -I I jF r u y (J (J i, i^ z u (J e z e (J (J o ur (J (J O O O O O O O O O O O O U O O O O O - O O Zo<od 6 o .Lo_a_ FUJFd F ." <???!?,*t1,1 ut6a ggg 4Gddde,t)G,d,dce,o A E ;00006,,.16666oe 2 2 =92!2!=22!2! 229o_= a ddc.e 5 |, =J!:=|:-:!J=) Ii j. 6 oooi = = =l;;ir= EE EEEEEEEEEAeA= ?!ggt1g=i1ii= a=EE6'|-'o H> <r'r rr': I I I ZvEEEd-EPEEE= lE55EE6;EEE6U= g g9:,8 S P X E 91i A i ie Y 9 9 9 e 9 9 9 Y e 1- !^ o,.o F. H !', (h ol r c.,, s (o){ !n F- tr) c) \o !^ c) ln Or rn F- o Ln r/t rr a O !^ Lo r^ 16 rJt d rnt s i 6!^roro (o dm.nli< m F d.{ m (h o N or o o rr.r.n $ 'a rl !/l io t-.(i oi o r^ ui iri a lri 'n Jr ;t ./i rri 6 6 !^ or oi ii ariF!r.r.trYr.n.nr^I^r^ro(DF-r.-F\F-F-F-F.FF.F-F-.o.odi.(j-('d-od-od.d--6cd66 FFFF oooo oooo oooo (JoguJ<9LUHEE>r6 E = a3 H qeE s e q== iE E E= IE H r;e : E -s64 z :E EsEEEEIBEE*;EE*EEEiEE=5E==EE:rE;EEEEE ;;3=;iE;!;=*!EEfiEEIEEE= =Ea irBb= s "ga-=i BEE= - EE =-Jz= =t ,tt 6 r e'2< -r =- oay 2 oa -{oz .. o 6 6 (D @ @ @ Co @ @ @ 0o co c! Q o!' 09 !! 9-o 9o co cbA :l 6 6 6 6 6 6 (o b (o @ ii (o 6 6 io @ (o (D to !9 !9 !0 \o (o rov l.i 6 6 6 n n n n n -J ..J i n 5 6 or 6' 6 u (, (n L 5a5(,rt,:-;.1 i 6 d di \i .h u A (! r.i p \D n (n u, P (o .{ L ur lD r\r o co O'!aa aa.ttj6a<t4 14t4U't4qoa:HPPP=PP=P<PPPCPSP=PE8PPE8PF -< = = - < = = < = < = = --r a i --{ --{ > --{ --{ -.{ --{ -{ -.1 --{ -.{OTTIIF-I=-=III--TI6)--I-I-II':===E==E=E===€€€E-=={€€€€€ =EEEnqEaEnEqqEqqqsqEqqEEqq;===x==x= x=== ====q======- - =FEFVEF;iVSFEEEEEEEEE!EEEE2'6'c1 -6 66 6 616o6a:)anan 6)66)6lo6)6)oa ii;i m- r mm4-e-bbb bb b b600000 aaaaasaaE€€ €g e cceggee ceeeseee 6 6 .1 .1 .) .) r) .) .) at al rt o 6 6 a) .) o o o o o o>tiiiai-iii- jii--I---rIr-II A a Z ? Z Z Z 2_? Z == z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 2H**I*sIIt***ItrI*fSI***iEEE2 Z'6 i''6 i^ i^'6 a^ v\ 'u1 in a^ -q i^ a^ a^ tn t a^ a a q u, t v\ t,.l"C 6;i;66a;i 66ata^a t 11 v1 a^ 6 a vt a a \4 lt t \ tA -. i; in ri n! nr m m m m m ir - m m m r m m => ? " " " " a ? ? ? ? "? ??? ? ??? ??? ? ? ? 6 s. 2 z - = - 2 - = 2 2 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 2FEssssssssssuussBsssssB$sgsnJ =;i ni ni ni ni 6J ae au u,, '.! u, (, (,@ u, (, oJ (, u, (,t u, ur (! (rr iiP-EE-;;i;iiiiiFPPo N{ ! { ! -r { \J.{..r ! {.{ \J !rJ \J -.1 !! \l'.J:J! {\J<*J -"i -d;& -d; - d; &&&&& && &&aee!IG 6 6 L,i an .n r,(nan(/llJi ! !r! !!(Jl(,(nu'; 5o a. 66 do co @-o@@ a. c. q,aa@@ 6 6 66 6 tlt 6iato@ro (o(.l ro(o(o@ 6 6 6 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ ca @ @co 6 @ @ @ aa @ F6 6 6 6 i6 6 b (o b \o ro @ @ 6 \o (o tO ao (o (D \O Q p !o (o5EE;;=;;x;J:sssSEs$$sAt3sv,t^t t4 9r6566666666ooOOOOoooooQQQo-E-E---ccccCc-ecccccccccc! - i = --{ --l --{ --r -.1iiiiiii-iiirrrirr--rrrr-r ===E========a{€€€{{{€EEE<ri ri ri ri ri.'i ni ni m m rri ri nFq!!lP919 9 22219 9I g 22222222299.24 -------- ';E'EE'Fii5''EEsEEEEEEEE''c\'61'ct'6 -Gt -a -6 6 6 6 6 Zr 6, o 6 6 an an o o o 6) o O 6)ninirrin;mrnm55555555555555555666666E6EEEEggegccccccceeeeseeees o o a I I"JNNJI\,^JNNJNJ ^JNI\JNJNI9I!\?N'NNJi.i ii :i ii n n n{ ir..r -r..1 n n n'{ ! ! '.J \.r .'l {{ !:r>l:lE d d d o' or oi oi oi oi or or o\ o1 ororootolqoro!oo1 or(^ol EHEEEddEHEEdEEHEd$EdddHdEHE5EXEEEEEsEsEtsgg838336ts38838 PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CHANHASSEN GATEWAY PUD, MODIFICATION TO PUD-SPECIFIC DESIGN FEATURES, AND AMENDMENT TO CROSSROADS OF CHANHASSEN SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 5,100 SQUARE-FOOT AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOP LOCATED AT 8941 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD. Weick: I will give it to Sharmeen. Al-Jaff: Thank you Chairman and members of the Planning Commission. The application before you is for a site plan to allow an automotive repair shop within the Crossroads Development. The site is located southwest of Crossroads Boulevard. It has an area of .79 acres and is zoned Planned Unit Development. Just a brief background on this. The 2030 Land Use Plan guided the site mixed-use. The area surrounding 212/101 intersection has been guided mixed use. These are the types of designations for uses that will meet the daily needs of the surrounding area. They also will accommodate high-density residential developments. In 2005 the City approved a concept plan for this area overall location and basically the area located north of Highway 212 was guided residential. The southern portions was a combination of commercial as well as office spaces. Again with the intent that these are neighborhood types of commercial uses that will meet the daily needs within this vicinity. We began working with Christian Bros. approximately six or seven months ago. This is an auto repair facility. Auto repair shops are not a permitted use within the Crossroads Development. As part of the work that we asked of them we needed a complete design that they submitted. The request is for a 5,100 square-foot building. Because this is a Planned Unit Development the overall site coverage is calculated as not to exceed 70%. In this case the total hard surface coverage within this entire development is 43.8%. The architecture of the building and design is attractive. All four elevations of the proposed building have received equal attention. Materials used on the building are of high quality. It is proposed to include brick, block, EFIS, as well as metal. The garage doors (there will be nine of them) are proposed to be made of glass and metal. They are fully screened. The overall design of the building is compatible and harmonious with existing buildings as well as future proposed buildings. This is accomplished through using compatible materials, complementary design elements including parapet walls, pronounced entryway, use of canopies over the windows, awnings over the windows, and glass windows throughout this development. Parking for this building is buffered from views through evergreens and landscaping. The total required parking for this development (there is a shared parking agreement for all of the buildings) and the total should be 247 and this entire development is proposing 278 parking spaces. Signage is proposed to include two wall-mounted signs facing northwest and southeast. Signage is in compliance with the ordinance. They do need to apply for a building permit but these are individual letters, backlit. There is one monument sign proposed along the northwest corner of the site and it may not exceed 24 square feet. Trails and sidewalks are intended to allow for connection between the subject site and the surrounding area and it will separate pedestrian from vehicular traffic. The landscaping plan is in compliance with ordinance. The shrubs along the east side of the site will fully screen the parking lot as well as the garage doors on this side. The applicant is proposing to Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 2 have a bench at the entrance in the southeast corner of the building. Lighting plan is in compliance with ordinance. What you see along the right side of the screen is existing light fixtures. What the applicant is proposing is very compatible with this development. This development was permitted a maximum number of 71,500 square feet of total building area. With this building the total number is going add up to 67,271 square feet. As I mentioned earlier, the current standards for the planned unit development do not list auto repair shops as a permitted use. Staff has prepared ordinances that regulate the automotive repair shop. The site plan cannot be approved without approval of this planned unit development amendment. We are recommending approval of the application with conditions. I’ll be happy to answer any questions. Weick: Thank you, Sharmeen. Very thorough as was the staff report. At this time I would open it up for commission questions. You can go ahead and just speak up if you have them. McGonagill: Sharmeen, the question I have go back to the site plan. Walk me through, I have two areas of curiosity. One is how the effluent will be handled inside the bays. What are they doing to wash down the bays, clean up, because there is oil and stuff leaking every day? How will that be handled inside the facility itself environmentally? Does it go to our stormwater? Does it go to sewage? Where is it going? The second one is out in the parking lot, the slope of the parking lot. Which way does it go? For example, if someone brings in a car and its leaking oil as they do and they are bringing it there for maintenance in rain, snow, whatever, which way will it go? Will it go to the stormwater pond that you have there? I’m just curious about that. To keep the contamination as I would call it on that site? Aanenson: Sharmeen, do you want to let the applicant answer that question? If that’s all right, Commissioner McGonagill? Al-Jaff: Sure. McGonagill: Sure, that’s fine. Or we can wait until the applicant presents. Aanenson: I think they are probably more technically… McGonagill: We can do that. What about the overall site grade? Do you know that? Henricksen: Sharmeen, I can butt in here if you guys can hear me. This is Erik Henricksen. I’m with the Engineering Department. I’m the Project Engineer. I did review of these plans. To kind of go back to your previous question, if I recall in the plans, and I would leave this up to Kimley- Horn too, but I believe they have a coalescing oil water separator. It’s a system that is pretreatment prior to discharge into the sanitary sewer system. I believe I did see that on the site plan. As far as slopes or grades it is relatively a flat lot. When the PUD was built out as mass graded, this lot was a part of that mass grading so it is relatively flat. As far as the parking lot itself, it does grade and drainage does go to the storm that’s going to be collected there so it Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 3 would be routed to catch basins in the parking lot. As far as the issue when cars are leaking in a repair area there is really no pretreatment on the storm that it goes directly to but the main focus again is how you deal with the pits and the drainage inside, which again is that pretreatment. It did appear adequate from our review. Again, I think Kimley-Horn knows more about the ins and outs of the, or the minutiae of that part. McGonagill: Thank you. That’s what I was expecting was some sort of a water coalescer. Usually that’s what you will see. Thanks. Wakefield: This is Jonathan Wakefield. I’m the property procurement director for Christian Bros. Automotive. I’m more than happy to answer the first part of the question regarding how we handle the internal cleanliness of the shop. We are not a wash-down shop at all. Modern EPA standards wouldn’t allow that and we’ve been compliant since we started operating in 1982. The way that we operate we have a Zamboni-style machine. It looks like something you would see on a small-scale hockey rink. It is a daily clean and scrub of the particulate matter that drops from the cars. That includes snow melt, so on and so forth. There are trench drains within the shop to take snow melt, rain, and so forth. That’s carried to the 750 gallon sand and oil separator that the Engineering folks alluded to earlier. I can go into a deep dive of our environmental compliance but we literally have a three-level containment system that more than exceeds state and federal containment requirements. Again, if you want me to go deeper into detail I certainly can, but we are as above and beyond as can possibly be imagined. McGonagill: Thank you. That’s all I have. Weick: Thank you. Great. Other questions from the commission or clarifying points? Von Oven: This is Commissioner Von Oven. On the staff report pages 13 and 14 is where you’ve got the PUD amendment and there you indicated staff had some concerns. In the bullet points below that, two bullet points I wanted to call out and just understand if they are somehow related or if they are not at all related. Bullet 2: All repair, assembly, disassembly… shall occur within a closed building. The second to the last bullet point is all service garage doors shall be screened. Is a garage door with a screen on it considered a closed building? Al-Jaff: No. The screening of the garage door is through landscape purposes. Von Oven: So we’re not talking about screens that allow noise through. We are talking about like blackout? Al-Jaff: No. Visual screen. Weick: Like the trees. Al-Jaff: So the trees along this… Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 4 Von Oven: Thank you. No further questions. Al-Jaff: Thank you. Aanenson: If I may, Chairman, I think that was one of the things that we contemplated when we looked at the orientation of the building for noise. This is adjacent to kind of the frontage road adjacent to 212 and so looking at that orientation the bays internally, but then that screening, the landscaping screening provides an additional visual impact and the noise attenuation. So that’s, it was kind of a twofold thing. We’ve had other auto repairs that there was conditions put on that the doors had to down the whole time. That is really onerous. For one, staff to try and enforce, and then seasonal times of the year that there may be some ambient noise. We have confidence that the way this operation is going to go that it would fit in. Again, we know there’s a demand fr this type of service in the community, and this seems like a good site. Kind of a transition when you are behind the existing gas station with that Kwik Trip and working on that orientation. Weick: Thanks, Kate. Reeder: I’m Mr. Reeder. Does what we’re doing here is a repair business and not a collision repair business? Does our ordinance distinguish between those? Al-Jaff: Yes, it does. What you have here is basically the equivalent of changing tires, oil. It’s not a body shop. It is actually engines and the running of… Reeder: So you would not expect to have a car that’s missing a front end or a … or whatever sitting in this parking lot? Al-Jaff: Well it depends on what type of damage has… Aanenson: Let’s let the applicant answer that. Wakefield: Again, this is Jonathan Wakefield. We don’t do anything to the exterior of a vehicle at all whatsoever. We don’t even do touch-up paint to a bumper. No window replacement. None of that. We are strictly internal and with a modern vehicle, a very high percentage of the work that we do is electronic and electronic diagnostic. Most vehicles have 32 on-board computers and/or sensors and that’s the vast majority of what you fix anymore. The mechanical aspect is still very important but our technicians are really accomplished at working with both a wrench and a laptop. So, all the work happens within the bays and happens to vehicles that, they are not there to have any kind of body work at all whatsoever, they’re just there to be repaired and put back on the road. Does that answer your question? Reeder: It does for you. My question for staff is whether or not the subsequent owner of this building would be restricted to that kind of repair? Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 5 Al-Jaff: Yes, they would be. Reeder: How? Al-Jaff: The city code defines auto repair shops and differentiates it from body shops. What the applicant is requesting is an auto repair shop, not a body shop. Reeder: So if somebody wanted to put a body shop in this building, they would have to go through an amendment to the PUD? Al-Jaff: That is correct. Reeder: In this current proposal are there any regulations on how many cars they can have sitting in their lot waiting for repair? Al-Jaff: No, there isn’t. There’s a limit on the number of parking spaces, there’s a limit on the square footage and how many bays there are so I’m assuming that if they reach capacity as far as vehicles that need to be fixed, they just will let their clients know that their appointment would have to wait to a later date or time. Wakefield: If I may I can elaborate on that as well. So there’s also is a stipulation in the restrictions that we have accepted with staff and those restrictions require that any vehicles that are in our parking lot, especially for overnight, must be operable. In other words, they can drive under their own power. If they can’t, they are in the bays overnight. They also have to be licensed. That keeps derelict vehicles from staying for extended periods of time. We don’t want that. A, it’s a bad look. This is a high-end neighborhood. We want to look like our neighbors and be attractive to them. That’s Item 1 and the other, somewhat self-serving here, when the cars leave, that’s usually when we get paid. So there is no incentive for a vehicle to stay long term, overnight occasionally as maybe somebody has to work late and they can’t pick up their vehicle until the next morning and so it forces a courtesy. The first nine vehicles we have go in the bays overnight, and if there happen to be some stragglers, we’ll put them in a lighted part of the parking lot and they will be picked up or worked on the next day. Aanenson: Chairman, if I may? Weick: Yes. Aanenson: That’s condition number 9 of the PUD and that’s what regulates it and that’s what Ms. Al-Jaff was talking about. We do differentiate it in the code but it is further spelled out in the PUD ordinance what was specific to this zoning district. Weick: Thank you. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 6 Reeder: Mr. Chairman, I’m not sure if I heard all of that but everything he says sounds super to me. Is that our requirement or the decision of the company that’s coming into this building at this time? Aanenson: It’s our requirement in the PUD. It says no vehicles that are inoperable can be parked there and that also they have to be licensed. That’s pretty much universal throughout the zoning district in the city. All other places that would do repairs. Reeder: Super. Weick: Great questions. Do you have more, Commissioner Reeder? Reeder: I think I’m good. I’m just looking for the trash receptacle. I assume it’s on the end of the building, is that correct? Al-Jaff: That is correct. It is along the north, right here. Weick: Which is towards Kwik Trip I think, right? Reeder: Super. Thank you. Al-Jaff: Northeast. Weick: Great. Other commissioners with questions? Hearing none, I would ask the applicant to rejoin us and if there is something to add. I know we’ve heard from you a couple of times already and we certainly appreciate that. That is very helpful. But we’d give you an opportunity to speak about the project and the neighborhood if you would like. Wakefield: Absolutely. So again, my name is Jonathan Wakefield. I’m the Property Procurement Director for Christian Bros. Automotive. I also have representation from Kimley-Horn. Christian was kind enough to give up an evening to back me up if you ask anything too terribly technical. Our Chief Development Officer is also on the call so you’ve got a Director and a CDO. That hasn’t happened before and hopefully that speaks to how important this project is to us and how taking root in your community is something that we dearly want to have happen. Also, a representative from the current owner of the property is here. We are in the process of buying it, developing it, and it is our goal to bring it to fruition. In looking at the history of this site, the lot that we are occupying was original designed for a bank. There are some things about Christian Bros. Automotive that I want to get into; some advantages that may not be too apparent. One of them is that our traffic count is extraordinarily low. As compared to a bank, we will reduce the traffic that it would have generated by 60-80%. So, at worst 60%. At best, 80%. The McDonald’s that’s already there and operating, we do less business by volume from a traffic standpoint all day than they do in 30 minutes. It’s stunning. There’s a value add in having a very low traffic generator. That’s really speaking to the transactional side of Christian Bros. coming in Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 7 and becoming part of this development. From a noise standpoint, that wasn’t brought up here in this particular forum, but it was brought up by staff. It was a detracting letter that was sent in an email. Somebody gave their voice and had a concern I wanted to address that as well. As staff alluded to our building orientation places the bays facing inboard and away from the street. The only people who might hear anything out of us might be the Kwik Trip, at worst. We’ve done two acoustic studies in other locales for other municipalities and we know, without any shadow of a doubt, that by the time the sound reaches our property line and crosses into somebody else, our loudest noise, which is the air hammer which takes the nuts off of a tire, is 74 decibels at the door and is attenuated out to somewhere between 40 and 50 decibels at the street. For reference, my speaking voice, I’m told, is somewhere between 50 and 55 decibels. I can talk all day as my staff will tell you, but we’re not running an air hammer all day. We work on about 17 cars a day, and that’s it. We are a true repair shop. We are not a tire and lube shop. That’s not our bit. We don’t need 200 cars a day to come through to have a viable business. That’s not what we’re there for. We see some real advantages. There was a line in the staff report that I really enjoyed and it was talking about neighborhood commercial uses: “Those uses that meet the daily needs of the residents.” That’s exactly what we do. A gas station does that. Having a childcare facility there does that. Across the street, although not part of this development necessarily, the Park and Ride does that. McDonald’s does that. Businesses that may or may not be liked in what they do but have a strong and positive impact on the community in the way that they serve it. Christian Bros. Automotive certainly does that. There were some environmental questions. I think I answered those. Lighting has been talked about. Again, that’s the transactional part of our presentation but I also want to move into the relational aspect of Christian Bros. and who we are and why we do what we do. We’ve been in operation since 1982. We have over 230 stores across the nation approaching 30 states. We may have 30 states. I’ve actually lost count in the 10 years I’ve been with the company. This is not our first rodeo by any stretch of the imagination and it’s not our first store in this particular area or your state. We are also in places you may have heard of: Maple Grove where incidentally we are part of, we are actually in their parking lot, for Parnassus Preparatory Charter School, so we play very well with others, even educational facilities like Primrose who is directly adjacent to us. Also in the Maple Grove facility, there is a Tender Time childcare facility as well and our Lakeville location we are one lot over from a KinderCare and actually we are directly adjacent to a KinderCare in Clive, Iowa. We’ve got another location coming up in Inver Grove. Two more in development: one in Woodbury and one in Savage. Actually a couple more that are too early to talk about. I say all that to say this: We are a highly professional company. Extremely reputable. Incredibly clean. I would challenge anyone and we offered this to staff as well, at least I told Christian to offer it to staff. Feel free to drive and look at any of our other facilities, the way they are operated, way we handle cars, the way we treat our customers, the shuttle vehicles that we have and then we take them to work and back, which helps reduce the car count. We are excited about the Park and Ride, that somebody could conceivably drop their vehicle off and before they hop on that mass transit vehicle, drop it off with us. We will fix your care while you are at work and come pick you up at the parking lot and take care of you. That’s a service that very few can offer. Again, I can’t stress enough how deeply embedded we are in the communities that we serve and service. We don’t look at our customers as customers or clients. They are friends. I know that sounds a little bit salesy but we Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 8 are a faith-based company and we are very proud of that and we feel that if we’re allowed to be a part of this community, a part of this development, we will have a lasting impact. I don’t know if I said it or not but since 1982 we have not closed a single location. Our business model is sound. Automotive repair is an essential business and during this time of COVID where we are all coping and doing strange things like having meetings in your home office, we have continued to shine. We had one down month and then it picked up immediately. Actually, the month after our down month was the best month we’ve ever had. We’re survivors and we’ll do well here and are very much looking forward to being part of what you already have and possess here: a great community. Again, I’m open for any questions. I’ve been with Christian Bros. for 10 years. There’s not a whole lot that hasn’t been thrown at me before and I can take it. Weick: Well, thank you very much. It’s a great presentation. You answered quite a few questions of mine. In that presentation, and I will certainly turn it over to our commission members if there are any clarifying questions they need to ask you or your team. We’ll give everyone a second to gather their thoughts if they would like. Wakefield: This is usually the part where I say I’ve flown in from Houston, Texas and my time is your time, but obviously we are not doing that right now. So I’m actually going to get to have dinner after this with my family so that’s kind of cool. Weick: That is a good side of it, yes. Wakefield: Anything you’ve got. We’re an open book. Very transparent. Weick: Are you working on something over there, Commissioner McGonagill? Okay. I wasn’t sure if you were turning or not. Okay. McGonagill: I’m good. Weick: I can see you. I can’t see everybody else. It doesn’t sound like, it sounds like you’ve touch on everything and you’ve certainly answered a few questions, throughout the staff presentation as well, so thank you very much. I appreciate the detail you provided and it certainly left our Commission members speechless so it must have been thorough. I will now open the public hearing portion of this matter. I will say that we did receive a couple of emails, or at least two and those are in the record. I think one was in favor and one was opposed to the building of the item. Al-Jaff: Correct. Staff has received phone calls. Weick: Okay. Al-Jaff: Mainly inquiries about what is the development and we just were able to answer all of their questions and ensure that if they had any comments or any concerns to let us know. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 9 Weick: Okay. Great. Anyone here present this evening who would like to come forward and speak an opinion on this item may do so at this time. Just please state your name and talk as loud as you can because the microphone is covered with plastic. Thank you for coming this evening. Chintaginjala: Good evening. May name is Bala Chintaginjala. My address is 8982 Southwest Village Loop. That is a townhome. From my home this proposed project is 800 feet away. By the way, I spoke to Sharmeen earlier today about this project. She tried to explain. Actually, I went through this project last weekend. It was very good. I am also a civil engineer. I worked for 10 years in the construction field but for the last 20 years I’ve been working in IT. I want to thank the applicant for investing in our city. He created jobs and also he will fulfill the needs of neighborhood residents. My request is, as long as we can keep the noise levels low as for the allowable limits, as for the core, and pollution is under control as for the limits. I don’t have any problem. I welcome this project and I want to vote yes for this project. Thank you very much. Gentlemen, thank you. Excellent job. Weick: Thank you so much and thank you for coming this evening and offering your views on this project. Very important. Anyone else present who would like to come forward on this item? We also have the call-in number on the screen. Is it lighting up over there? Al-Jaff: Nothing is happening. Weick: All right. So I mentioned the emails have been noted and are in the record and thank you this evening for speaking. Your opinion on the item as well. We’re just checking the phones. We’re just making sure anyone who wants to call in, can. I know it’s weird. We’ve done this a couple of times but it still is a challenge to get used to the new way of doing things but we will perfect it, I’m sure. With that, I will close the public hearing portion of this item. We’ve heard from staff, our applicant, as well as members of the community in person and via email, and telephone calls earlier. So thank you to everyone who has expressed their views and opinions on this item. At this time the item is open for the Planning Commission to discuss the item amongst ourselves, voice any opinion, concerns, and certainly would be open to a motion and a second as appropriate. Yes, Commissioner Skistad. Skistad: I am Commissioner Skistad and I appreciate all the work that went into this proposal and I’m excited about having it. I do think it’s something we need for the community and it’s very well done and very well thought out. The building is beautiful, so this would be something that I would definitely support. I appreciate all of the parties that worked so hard on this project. Weick: Awesome. Thank you. I concur. Some things that were touched on that I had written down. Certainly people had mentioned noise a lot and one thing that I had sort of, I know Commissioner Reeder had mentioned it, is it like, could it be a body shop and it’s not like that. My big question was, is it like one of those quick-change oil places where you got like you mentioned. They make money by turning cars. Turn and burn. Turn and burn and that’s where I Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 10 think you can start to get into unsightly potentially traffic patterns, noise patterns. They’re not as concerned with limiting those things, right? They need to get in and out. That’s clearly not what’s going on here and so I think that’s great. In fact, having seen that area and, I don’t think it’s the number one probably noise unsightly or detractor, if you will, in that area. That Kwik Trip is packed and like there’s cars everywhere, and people pumping gas and going in and out of the store and running through the car wash. All this stuff. I just think it’s a good use of the land and I think it will be a, I honestly believe it will be a good neighbor for the area. McGonagill: Mr. Chairman, I would agree with you and I think the thing that I think about with their affect is true. I mean a third of the price of your car these days is electronics. Weick: Right. McGonagill: And you’re not, everybody guarantees their drive trains for 100,000 miles but the electronics are the ones you’re working on so I think it’s good. I appreciate the way they thought it out. I do also appreciate staff’s conditions that you put in there on the fact of it has to be drivable, things like that have to be kept sitting out there and there are some conditions to try and keep it up as nice as possible and I think it would be a good add. These kind of facilities, if you think about it, it will probably hire 12-15 people that will be good, permanent jobs by the time you go through it all, not counting the suppliers, not counting anything else that goes through there. It’s a nice extension so I’m in favor of it, Mr. Chairman. Weick: Awesome. We would certainly entertain a motion if there weren’t… Reeder: Mr. Chairman? I’m prepared to make that motion. I think it’s a good project in a good place. I’m pleased with the operation suggestions that they have so I would make the motion. Reeder moved, Noyes seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Site Plan consisting of a 5,100 square-foot automotive repair shop and Planned Unit Development amendment for Chanhassen Gateway allowing automotive repair shops with standards, Planning Case 2020-21 as shown in plans dated received October 30, 2020, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, subject to conditions. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. Weick: The motion passes unanimously 7-0. Again, thank you for all your hard work Sharmeen. I know this has been a long one and detailed and it’s very important any time we are amending PUD and adding a new neighbor. We want to make sure that its right for the neighborhood and this feels like a good one. Thank you for your hard work. Thank you to representatives from Christian Bros. as well. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 11 Aanenson: I would just like to make a reminder Chairman that this item does go to the City Council so for anybody that’s following along, that will be scheduled for the December 14th City Council meeting for final action. Weick: Thank you and thank you for coming and speaking this evening as well. Appreciate that. We do have a couple other items on the agenda this evening. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 12 PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1601 LAKE LUCY ROAD FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTIAL (LOW DENSITY). Weick: With that I will turn it over to Sharmeen. Thank you, Sharmeen. Al-Jaff: Chairman and members of the Planning Commission, the application before you is a request to rezone from rural residential to planned unit development. Briefly, the site is located south of Lake Lucy Road. It is surrounded by Lake Lucy in its entirety. The site has an area of approximately 9.03 acres. It is currently zoned rural residential. Access to the site is gained via Lake Lucy Road. The 2040 Land Use Plan guides the subject site for low density residential. Within a low density you can have 1.2 units per acre but no more than 4 units per acres. This category can be either zoned into single-family residential, R-4 which is a mix of low density, residential low and medium density, or planned unit development-residential. Rezoning this property into any of those categories would allow the site to be consistent with the 2040 Land Use Plan. Brief background. Back in 1993 the owners of the island at the time came in for a wetland alteration permit for the purpose of constructing a bridge and a driveway to access the driveway. There were multiple extensions granted to this. The work was completed on the bridge as well as the driveway in 1999. Some of the things that have taken place that we also need to point out is that since 2018 staff has been working with the applicant very closely. This site is truly unique. It is the only island that has building rights within the City of Chanhassen. The applicant’s goal is to build a single-family home for their family and an accessory dwelling unit for his mother. The site contains bluffs and wetlands. It is located within the shoreland overlay district of Lake Lucy and it has 100% tree canopy cover. The access driveway off of Lake Lucy Road connects the island to Lake Lucy Road via a bridge. The length of this driveway is approximately 1,600 feet and this is just the distance between Lake Lucy Road and the bridge right here. Looking at the different options, we know that this is a lot of record, it is entitled to the building of a single-family home. The applicant’s request was to have a principle structure with an accessory dwelling unit. This can either be achieved via subdivision or rezoning the site to planned unit development. We looked at the impact of subdividing the site versus rezoning it to planned unit development. With a subdivision, you will be able to accomplish the additional home; however, you will have to widen the driveway to 20 feet. There is additional grading, tree removal, hard surface, potential for two additional home sites rather than the two that the applicant is requesting. Also, there is more potential for grading with the extension of public utilities. Through a planned unit development, the applicant would be able to use the existing driveway. There is a septic system that is proposed on the site as well as a well. We are able through the planned unit development regulations to cap the size of the accessory dwelling unit. We can require the use of a single internal driveway and the planned unit development governing the site would establish additional limitations on the site. The applicant selected to move forward with a planned unit development approach. With that, staff directed the applicant to put together a concept, bring it before the city to allow us to evaluate the request, and bring it before you. It is important that we point out this is a concept. It was intended to give us an idea of what it is the Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 13 owner of the property’s intentions were and how to write proper ordinances that address concerns, improve potential development of the site, add regulations and improve the quality of development. Some of the things that we’re able to accomplish is that the total permitted site coverage is 20%. What the applicant is proposing is going to be below 15%, 14.5% with this concept. We sent this concept to multiple agencies including the watershed, the DNR, and staff at the city, and there was one reoccurring theme that was pointed out by the different agencies and different staff members and that had to do with the amount of grading and what can be done to reduce the grading. So we had a discussion with the property owner and the initial proposal basically looked at serving the main home via one driveway. At the southern portion of the island the driveway would split to serve the accessory dwelling unit. We recommended that the applicant unify those driveways and share access, basically eliminating everything that you see in the hatched red and the applicant can talk about that further but he did agree to this request and understood that this was a concern to many different departments and different staff members. What some of the other elements that this planned unit development will regulate is the fact that you can have one single-family home and one accessory dwelling unit. The ownership of those two homes; they cannot be sold separately. These will remain under single ownership. There is no short-term lease and with short term we are defining it as less than three months. We are limiting the size of the accessory dwelling unit. There are measures in place to ensure fire prevention. We are requesting that the driveways be combined. The applicant was directed to continue working with staff to promote preservation of natural features of the site. We are limiting the size of the accessory structures which also include water-oriented structures for the island. We are also regulating dock rights within this development. Staff is recommending approval of this application of this request because I had mentioned earlier, yes it can be subdivided but this is a mechanism for the city to regulate the future development of this site. This is the type of development when basically a one-size-fits-all ordinance was difficult to implement on a parcel such as this one. We are recommending approval with comments in the staff report and as an adoption of the attached ordinance. One thing I do need to point out is that staff received three emails in addition to the emails included in your staff report. They were from Gregory Fast, Kathryn Randall (also goes by Betsy), and Kim and Tom McReavy. The emails basically included comments requesting minimizing grading, concerns with potential light pollution on the island, impact to surrounding habitat. Other comments involved support of the project, commending the applicant for removing buckthorn from the island. With that, we will make sure that these are incorporated as part of the public record when this items appears before the city council. I’ll be happy to answer any questions. Weick: Great. Thank you. I will open it up for commissioners to ask questions. McGonagill: I have the same questions I had before on the previous item and it’s about fire. They’re going to have a well and other fire suppression sprinklers inside the structures? Al-Jaff: Correct. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 14 McGonagill: So there’s not a hydrant or anything down there? There’s no sewage down there? They have their own septic system? Al-Jaff: Correct. And there was a rather lengthy meeting that took place between the fire chief and the applicant. They walked the site and they agreed upon a consultant that specializes in fire suppression. The applicant would be able to speak to this matter further. McGonagill: In the conversations with the fire chief is it his intention, as I just sit here looking at the bridge, will the bridge take a fire truck? Al-Jaff: Yes, actually it would. McGonagill: So they could get equipment down there. Al-Jaff: Correct. So what we are waiting for is official certification that the bridge will be able to handle the truck. Preliminary investigations tell us that yes, it will be able to handle it. McGonagill: Under the conditions of the PUD can you put in a requirement that the bridge always be able to handle a truck? Bridges age. To meet that. I don’t know if there is a code for that but I just want the ability to get an ambulance down there. At least to get one small piece of equipment in there. If there was an emergency, that’s whose going to respond and I don’t want to see the fire truck go blasting down through there no knowing if the bridge won’t take it and it ends up in the lake. Aanenson: I’m not sure you mentioned this Sharmeen but the house will be fire sprinkled. McGonagill: Yes, she said that. But they respond. Like a 9-1-1 call, somebody calls and has a heart attack or something and the fire guys, they respond. What I’m looking for is can in the PUD you put requirements similar to commercial bridges. That it’s maintained at a certain standard to allow fire equipment access. Al-Jaff: Specifically from a safety standpoint and emergency management, that will be the intent. Staff will check with the city attorney to ensure that…It is staff’s intent to ensure that this requirement is part of the planned unit development. We will check with legal counsel. McGonagill: The second question is similar to that. Is access for other commercial vehicles, garbage trucks, etc., they will have the same? Aanenson: Can I just clarify that, too? I think oftentimes in situations like that you have to bring your garbage up to the street. That’s actually a private driveway so typically you take your trash up to the end of the driveway, but we can clarify that. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 15 McGonagill: Okay. Very good. Because it’s, I just think about natural activities, landscaping, and construction. People are going to always be doing something down there. There’s going to be a weight requirement on that bridge? Aanenson: Yes, when they are constructing the house for sure. McGonagill: For sure and then as you go down the road it will be there too. I just want to ensure that it’s maintained safely. I realize it’s a private drive. It’s not our responsibility. But with a PUD it is. I mean we could put that in the PUD if that’s the way we want it to be done and just ensure that it’s safe. Okay. That’s all the questions I have. Weick: Great. Thank you. Other questions? Noyes: I have a little bit of a follow up question to kind of the previous one and it’s related to that private road and the maintenance of it. I would imagine the property owner is responsible for the plowing of that road in the winter? The plowing of the snow? Are there any restrictions related to use of road chemicals on that road given that this is a bridge over a lake. Al-Jaff: So back in 1993 when the wetland alteration permit was approved for the construction of the driveway one of the conditions was limiting chemicals used on the driveway. Noyes: Thank you. Skistad: I’m going to assume that flooding is not really an issue. It is an issue? Al-Jaff: It is…the island sits over 30 feet above the ordinary high water mark of Lake Lucy so it’s fine. It will be okay. Skistad: Okay. The other question I had was the accessory dwelling unit. It says it has a maximum of two bedrooms and it may not exceed 1600 square feet. I’m just wondering why we are limiting it to two bedrooms because like a typical apartment would be 1200 to 1300 square feet for a three-bedroom and this would be 1600 so it seems like…I was just curious about that. Why we would be limiting it specifically to two bedrooms with 1600 feet? Al-Jaff: So the 1600 feet was requested by the applicant. Number of bedrooms within the structure, a couple of things came into play. The first one was the capacity of the septic system that is proposed out there. This site will take in the sewage from the main house as well as the accessory dwelling unit. The intent is to provide a place for mom to live as well as a potential caregiver. So these are the two reasons why we limited the number of bedrooms, directly relating to the septic system that’s going to serve this site. Also, we needed to ensure that this was not a full-fledged detached single-family home but rather truly an accessory dwelling unit and it was reasonable to limit the size. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 16 Skistad: Thank you. McGonagill: Follow up on Commissioner Skistad’s septic system question, has any sort of percolating test been done on the island to know if the septic system will work out there? Aanenson: Just a second. Can you make sure you are speaking into your microphone? McGonagill: Sure. I’m sorry. I’ll just repeat the question. Follow up on Commissioner Skistad’s question on the septic system. Has any sort of percolating test been done on the island to give a high degree of certainty that a septic system will work and not effluent go into the lake? Aanenson: The Building Official looked at that, just cursory soil types, and they believe there is a couple different types of systems but they are confident that one of those would work. McGonagill: Okay. Thank you. Von Oven: We’ve been very specific about this accessory dwelling unit so as not to make it a sellable total home. I guess, given my unfamiliarity with those things, is there anything about an accessory dwelling unit that makes it less safe than the requirements on a normal single-family home? Aanenson: No. It would still have to go through the building permit process. Be inspected like a regular one. Again, the goal was, there’s no limit to the square footage of a home so you can have one large home. In this circumstance they have identified a home and want to have an ancillary one instead of saying you are going to get two lots. We want to cap those so it doesn’t become two separate lots as Ms. Al-Jaff indicated. But it has to go through the same rigorous. It would have to meet as Sharmeen indicated there would have to be sewer and water which would be through the well and septic and in addition, all of the building codes. Von Oven: I understand that it was the request of the applicant to make that accessory dwelling unit a maximum of 1600 feet. I’m still confused on the max of two bedrooms. Sharmeen, I know you said part of the reason for this was to ensure that it doesn’t turn into a single-family home. Given that that’s covered in other areas, I’m going to make the assumption that the actual single- family home to be built can has as many bedrooms as it wants, right? Al-Jaff: That’s correct. As long as the number of bedrooms can be served via public or private utilities. Von Oven: Okay. I guess then my question ends up being this: Between these two structures, is there a maximum number of bedrooms that the proposed sewage system will be able to handle, and is that governed through some sort of inspection process? Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 17 Aanenson: Correct. It is. They have to demonstrate that and it’s actually based on bedroom space to your septic and well. Let’s just go back to the two separate dwellings again. If you have enough to make it two complete homes then you have different traffic patterns, different use of the property. So when it’s intended to be ancillary and regulated by the homeowner, it’s a different feel than two separate homes with cars coming and going, two sets of trash being hauled up to the end of the driveway, that sort of thing. We are looking, it says one structure with something ancillary that is related to that principal structure. Von Oven: Thank you. Skistad: I guess I’m just going to ask a future question then. So if, let’s say that someone in the future, a new person has purchased the property. Perhaps they will probably have to install a new septic system so they won’t be able to increase the bedroom. The land won’t be able to have a three-bedroom instead of a two-bedroom unit unless they come back to us and ask for a variance? Aanenson: Yes. Or amend the PUD. Typically, if you add additional bedrooms, you have to demonstrate that you have sewer capacity. Could they oversize it to begin with? That’s potential. I’m not sure. That is something that would have to be looked at at the time when they are putting together the system. Any changes to the plan as laid out would have to come back. Any modifications, which would have to come back as a PUD amendment. That’s why the PUD was put together. To regulate all that’s being used. Skistad: I understand what you are doing. I understand what you are saying, but let’s say that they have an office and it just naturally becomes a bedroom at some point. I don’t know if there is a better way to write that. Because the goal is to just make sure obviously that we don’t overcome the sewage capacity because we don’t obviously want to spill anything into Lake Lucy. Weick: There is a septic field sizing attachment which is really long actually. They specify, and there’s two different options. They specify seven bedrooms and then they sort of explain how they can. It really comes down to the bedrooms. They explain how they can appropriately fit one or two mounds or septic systems to support the seven bedrooms where they can build one for the main house and one for the accessory structure. But there’s only so much space to be able to have the runout fields and all that kind of stuff. I think what they are saying is it sounds like they want that primary structure to be five bedrooms and honestly, I think all that’s left is just size. Aanenson: Capacity. Weick: Thank you. That’s a better word. Capacity. Is two bedroom. I think they are fully limited by septic and nothing else. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 18 Aanenson: So if one of the bedrooms in the accessory building was being used as an office, that’s fine. It wouldn’t affect. Weick: Right. Skistad: Okay. Weick: Great. These are great questions. It’s awesome. It’s really important. Reeder: Under normal regulations, is it possible for this accessory dwelling unit to be rented out or would that be illegal? How would be control that? Al-Jaff: They can rent it out but it cannot be a short-term lease. It has to be three months or more. Reeder: So we essentially have two residences on one lot? Al-Jaff: Correct. Which is permitted under a planned unit development. Aanenson: It was proposed, it was originally intended to be an accessory structure for a grandparent. Could it be used for something else? We always as planners try to anticipate something in the future. So if you’re doing a weekly rental, you have a different capacity whether there is two bedrooms. How it’s being used is different that someone who might rent it for the summer or something like that. That’s how we looked at that it. Looking at having a three-month as opposed to renting it out by the week. Reeder: So there’s no requirement that the accessory building, the person that lives in that building, be related to the main building? It can be anybody? It seems like we had one of these accessory buildings I think about two years ago that we approved and I can’t remember what the requirements were. Aanenson: Right now we have a variance requirement that you can finish your basement off and have someone living with you but that has to be related to you. It’s a different requirement. It is certainly a requirement that you could put on this property. That’s certainly under the PUD. You could say that the person living there has to be related. That’s an option. We gave a different option. Reeder: What is the intent of the proposed property owner? Aanenson: I would have to ask the applicant to speak to that. Skistad: I’m just going to look at this from a lease perspective again. I’m just going to assume that, let’s just say it sold and they want to lease this secondary area. I’m going to assume that you Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 19 could do a typical lease which runs 12 months and then possibly it turns into a month-to-month lease but that wouldn’t cause any problems here because they would have met the minimum. Aanenson: Yes. Skistad: Okay. Weick: Great. More thoughts or questions on this one for Sharmeen? Just holler if I’m rushing you as commission members. If you need some more time to read or think, just holler at me. I don’t want to push anybody. Von Oven: Hey, Commissioner Weick! Weick: Yes. Von Oven: I’m hollering at you. I’ve been sitting here trying to figure out how to ask this question so it’s not going to come out right. At the very beginning, Commissioner McGonagill talked about the bridge and it was very clear to me that an existing bullet, there is not an existing bullet in the PUD that says, “Hey, this bridge has to be safe.” So I think my question is more procedural. For us as a Planning Commission tonight, moving forward with this. If there are those of us who would like to see a bullet point in that PUD, is that be an amendment possibly? Is that a motion? Is that something that can be done after the fact? How does that work? Aanenson: I would recommend that you make it, if someone wanted that in the conditions, that you make that an amendment to the motion, that that be added. Von Oven: Okay. McGonagill: Following up to his question procedurally, does that happen after the first motion or can you make an amendment before then? Aanenson: You can make it as part of your original motion. Weick: As part of the motion. Aanenson: So what we’re checking on is the legality. It is a lot of record so they could build on that lot without going through this process and you would have the same jurisdiction. But we’ll follow up on that and have that answer if you want to amend that motion and get that clarified when it goes up to city council. McGonagill: Very good. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 20 Von Oven: Got it. Okay, sorry. I’m going to repeat what you just said to make sure I understood it. If the applicant was just going to build a single-family home, they could just do that in its current state? Aanenson: Yes. Von Oven: The reason why our concerns about the bridge holding an ambulance could be met is because they are asking for this variance. I’m sorry, this rezoning, in which case we have the ability to amend what is being proposed right now as the PUD? Aanenson: That is correct. Von Oven: I think I’m getting this thing down. Thank you. Weick: You’re killing it. But a motion is premature at this point because we have not heard from the applicant or the public hearing. So unless there are other… I will move at this point to, and we certainly have an opportunity to follow up with staff as questions come up. I would invite the applicant if they are on the Zoom call to make any comments or a presentation. Wicka: I am and thank you very much. Weick: Welcome! Wicka: Thank you. And thank you to all the members of the Planning Commission for considering this rezoning request. My name is John Wicka. I live at 2547 Bridle Creek Trail in Chanhassen with my wife and five daughters. We’ve been, I don’t know if this qualifies, in Chanhassen as long-time residents but we’ve been here is this house for 17 years. At least we’re not newcomers. I thank you for the opportunity to speak to you all and offer you a little additional information and commentary for your consideration as you consider this rezoning request. The first time my wife and I experienced the island was in June of 2018, just over two years ago and it was just recently put up for sale by Al and Mary Weingart who live on the adjacent property and still do. It was their dream to build a home out on the island. They’re the ones that oversaw the building of the bridge so I’ll come back around and talk more about that and I will be happy to answer any questions pertaining to the bridge. I understand there is a lot of concern in and around that. When we first experienced the island in June of 2018 I think our first reaction was I guess we couldn’t believe it was available. It’s sizeable. It has some acreage to it. It’s unique. It’s an island but it’s even better than an island. It’s an island with a pre-existing, very capable bridge that is intended to support fire trucks and construction trucks and so forth. It was really an ideal find for us. If you’ve had a chance to consider the topography map there, the top graphic map, it’s very interesting topography. It’s flat around many of the edges but it has this elevation in the center of the island and there are bluffs there. There are bluff setbacks there. There are wetland setbacks so there is a lot of dynamic things happening on the island but it is indisputably breathtakingly beautiful. We were excited about the opportunity because of the size Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 21 of the property and it had been our desire for several years to build a home for my mother who is now 86 years old near us. My dad died 21 years ago so this has been kind of something that we’ve been thinking of considering and planning for some time now. My mother is fiercely independent but she is 86 years old. She now really relishes or welcomes or is excited about the opportunity to maintain her independence but still have us just a moment’s notice away. So this was one of the big motivations for us to purchase the island because we thought it gave us the elbow room, if you will, to build a separate structure for her. Just two months later we purchased the island and at that time the first order of business was to eradicate the buckthorn. I think about it as kind of freeing the island because the buckthorn had a choke hold on the island. I think it was a neighbor’s comment that Sharmeen referenced a few moments ago that they were glad that we took out the buckthorn. I worked with Jill Sinclair. Walked the island with her over two years ago. She made some recommendations on some experts that could remove the buckthorn and treat it. It transformed the island back to its natural state. So it was very important for us to get the balance back to the island, and it doesn’t surprise me that the neighbors were in favor or positively affected by that because they all look at the island. It makes the view of the island so much more interesting because you get depth. It looked like an overgrown bush. You couldn’t see into it. You couldn’t penetrate it. Frankly, when you were on the island you couldn’t see the water from the interior of the island. So that was important to us. I don’t know what your experience is with buckthorn but I didn’t realize they grew into trees. Sizeable, 14-inch diameter type size trees. So it was not a small undertaking. At the same time in August of 2018 when we undertook the eradication of the buckthorn, we ran off full speed with an architect to build our dream home and with an attached, if you will, living structure for my mother. We intended to do that via connecting it by a skyway or a tunnel so that we met all of the city requirements. But, the things that make the island beautiful and unique and magical also make it a very challenging piece of property to build on. Again, there are bluffs. There are bluff setbacks. There are wetland setbacks. There was only one sensible place to put the septic system. There is a lot of elevation in the interior of the island so getting the grading right to get up that high is tricky business. Sadly, about five months later after spending a fair amount of money in architectural fees, we bagged it. We were demoralized. We couldn’t get it right. It was like putting together a puzzle and we couldn’t seem to kind of crack the code to make it work, so we stopped. We let several months go by. I did reach out to city staff and I had all sorts’ questions about variances and every time we turned around we hit another complication and we just couldn’t get it to work. But after kind of a cooling off period we took a second attempt at it but we stopped again because it just was overwhelming. It was an emotionally overwhelming, and I know you may be thinking how can it be so hard when there is that much space to work with? But again, all of the complexities layered on top of each other make it a very challenging task. So I circled back with city staff another time looking for more out-of-the-box solutions, if you will, and that’s when I discovered that single-family residential was an option. So, we started looking at that and we realized that that was a really big undertaking. As Sharmeen, the road coming down that services the island from Lake Lucy Road would have to be widened considerably. There were, I think, nine or more agencies that were involved in the original construction of the road and bridge in 1998-1999 and so to bring sewer and water down, the only way we could get our head around that would be to involve a developer and go through the whole subdividing of the island and that’s not what we Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 22 had in mind for the island. We were enamored with natural beauty of it and this felt like we would have to get very creative and create lots and the size of the roads and the cul-de-sacs and the infrastructure just made this a very undesirable option. That led us to the option to consider the PUD which, the way I understand it, is it provides some flexibility in creating exceptions that we are talking about here today but also requires, if you will, something in return, meeting the higher standards, sprinklers, or the turnarounds for the fire trucks, the higher building standards. We intend to build a green, being environmentally green with solar and geothermal and high building standards, and high-quality windows, and recapturing rainwater for reuse, that type of thing. So we intend to meet the higher standards in the conditions put upon the PUD request. This seemed to be a much more sensible solution, not only for what we were trying to accomplish, but really for all parties involved. The impact on the island is much lower than going for single-family residential. It’s better for the community, for the neighborhood, for the island, and so it seemed to be much more sensible and while I suppose the single-family residential is an option, it’s not a very good option. We would like to preserve the integrity of the island, not only now but into the future and we think this is a way to do that. I only have a few more comments if you can bear with me for just a few more moments. I did have a chance to meet with the city and county experts on some of the challenges that the island offers. I was able to walk the island with Fire Chief Don Johnson… (coughing). I just got over COVID so pardon the cough here. Weick: Thanks. Wicka: I’m in the clear now but I can tell it is still affecting my throat. I was able to walk the island with Fire Chief Don Johnson and he understandably had some concerns, some of them that you stated. That’s why we had gone through, I went back to the bridge builder and designers and it is and always was designed to carry not only construction trucks, but emergency vehicles and fire trucks. I’ll come back and be happy to answer questions about that. We also incorporated turnarounds for the fire trucks. I heard some of that commentary and concerns in the previous PUD that you were discussing. So we have accounted for that. I also was able to have a Zoom meeting with Terry Jeffery, Watershed Planning Manager with Bluff Creek. I also learned quite a lot in my conversation with Terry and was very pleased because I know this is high on everybody’s list, keeping the integrity of the water and the cleanliness of the lake. That’s certainly a concern of ours. I was very pleased in that conversation with Terry. He was very matter of fact. He knew exactly which five concerns he had that we needed to meet and we went through them together. I won’t put words in his mouth because I’m sure he’s commented on his own, but by the end of the conversation I think we, I think I can say both agreed that the island actually handled all of these requirements very well, actually. We didn’t have any concerns there. I’ll trust that he gave his own report and that it’s consistent with what I’m saying. The driveway, the purpose for that driveway that runs further to the south that forks off was to service the accessory dwelling unit. The reason for that, and I have a little bit of heartburn giving that up I’ll be honest with you, but I’m willing to make that a condition is because it’s flat. If you can see those topographic lines there it doesn’t climb the elevated area of the island. It runs along the south side and is largely flat. That was intended to make it easier for my aging mother to be able to go out and walk and get outside, frankly, and enjoy the island. But, as I said, we have agreed Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 23 to make it a condition. There were multiple comments on that assuming that’s still desirable we have agreed to have the one driveway service both dwelling units. My final comment is I did initiate some outreach to the Lake Lucy Homeowners Association and that consisted of all lot owners on Lake Lucy and they are the ones most impacted by any development that we do on the island, whatsoever. So I did initiate some outreach there. Because of COVID we weren’t able to organize any in-person meeting, but I did encourage them all to bring any questions or concerns with me. I did hear from three of the parties. I was able to answer their questions. Most of them were curiosities and clarification. I believe I have all of their support, at least I’m not aware of anyone that doesn’t support it. I was able to provide them with clearer maps than were available on the city website so they could get a better understand of what we were after. So, I feel pretty good about engaging the neighborhood and as I said I heard from some of them but I think it was all positive interaction and I hope and I believe that I have their support. Again, I would like to thank you all for your consideration here and I’m happy to take any questions you might have. Weick: Wow. Thank you so much. That offers a lot of color and clarity on what you’re trying to do and thank you for hanging in there with your cough and giving us that. That’s really helpful. I will open it up though. I know there were several questions that commission members had raised that I know would have been properly answered by you. I don’t know if those have already been answered but we’ll open it up to the commission members to either ask follow ups on those questions or ask new questions. McGonagill: Thank you for a very good presentation and walking us through this. You walked with the Fire Chief so I would assume, talk to us about the bridge that there is a certain design standard the bridge has been designed to and it was for construction equipment and for fire equipment and it is your intention to maintain that standard in the bridge going forward? Wicka: Yes it is Commissioner and thank you for the opportunity to come back around and address the concerns around the bridge. Fire Chief Johnson was, we had quite a lot of back and forth via email after our meeting and he was able to provide me with the specifications on the two, I believe they are the two largest trucks, but they are also the two primary trucks that would service the island in case of a fire. I did share that with the company that built the bridge. They went to their engineers and shared with me that the bridge was designed and built to support trucks of that size. That answers I think the question in terms of when it was originally built. I think your question is a fair one in terms of ongoing upkeep and maintenance and as long as it’s a reasonable interval so that, because I am sure there are cost implications that come with this, but as long as there is a reasonable interval to recertify it with an engineering firm that it is still capable or operating as designed, still capable of supporting those trucks, I would be happy to incorporate that. McGonagill: Thank you. I appreciate that because just like you I’ve got some elderly parents and when I call emergency services I want them to be able to get to them, and it’s very true to you, too. On the design, one of the questions I have for you is, I didn’t see it. I may have missed it Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 24 because I just probably missed it. There’s a two-story guest house and there is also an accessory structure at the end of the first driveway. Is that a garage? Wicka: I think it’s ultimately going to be a multi-purpose structure. It’s put there because as someone was pointing out earlier we’re going to be responsible for a lot of private driveway here. So I’m envisioning a plow in there and probably other utility-type tools and needs for the island. We put it there so it was kind of closer to the access point of the island and also a little bit out of the way although we intend to design it such that it’s equally attractive to the rest of the structures on the island. McGonagill: Thank you. That’s all I had Mr. Chairman. Weick: Great. Thank you. Any other questions for our applicant? Skistad: I don’t have a question I just have a, I guess a statement. My goal, my questions about the limitations of the bedrooms was just to make sure we weren’t putting a limitation over the property unnecessarily. That was the only goal with that. I think it sounds like a great project so I’m for it so that was the reason for reason for those questions. Weick: Great. Thank you. Wicka: And thank you Commissioner for that thought. I appreciate it. When it was suggested that it be limited we were agreeable to it because as previously stated the concept is just a space for my mother and perhaps a caregiver. So thank you. Aanenson: Mr. Chair, if you want to open the public hearing. Weick: I will. I was just giving people a second in case they wanted to speak. I always feel like I’m talking over somebody. Thank you Commission members and thank you for, again, a really thorough and honest appraisal of how you are going to use that beautiful piece of property so thank you very much for joining us. At this time I will open the public hearing portion. If anyone would like to come forward and speak and opinion on this matter may do so now. Sharmeen, you already. I might be mixing my cases but I think you already summarized the emails for us, right? Al-Jaff: I did. Weick: Yes. Thank you. And those will be in the record and the telephone number has been up on the screen for a little bit. Would you like to? Yeah, absolutely. So we have someone joining us here in chambers. Again, as you’ve heard, just please speak very loudly into the microphone. Frerichs: Thank you very much. I’m Roger Frerichs and we are neighbors on Lakeway Drive, the street right over next to it. I didn’t come here with any particular speech in mind but I came with less knowledge and so after hearing the discussion of the owner, it sounds like he’s trying to Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 25 maintain the beauty that that island has and that’s why I think it should be something that we should favor. Weick: Thank you so much. I’m happy to agree. I do think it’sa , considering the alternatives, I think it’s certainly a good use. Any phone calls? Al-Jaff: I haven’t heard so far. None. Weick: None. With that and with no one else here in chambers I will close the public hearing portion of tonight’s matter and open to commissioner comment, discussion, and motion. And I pre-empted a little bit there. It is getting late, I have to admit and I’m maybe getting a little dreary. I offered my opinion there a little bit too soon but I am certainly in favor of this PUD. I imagine that if there is concern from neighbors or public like myself, I was envisioning a typical development that we look at where they come in and they grade it down, they clear out the trees, they build four houses and four docks. You know what I mean? That option I think would be disappointing at least to me and I imagine for some of the local residents as well. I would imagine once seeing and hearing these plans it puts to rest those concerns of dramatically changing the view of that island which I just don’t think will happen. I am certainly strongly in favor of the PUD in this instance, and if things want to be added to it, we can certainly do that as part of the motion. McGonagill: Mr. Chairman, I agree with you to stick with the other, just to the small amendment we talked about on the bridge just for emergency access. I’m also there with you because, let’s face it. This is privately owned. It’s property that someone has owned and purposed. They have the constitutional right to develop it and they worked through the process and I think it’s about as nice as one could imagine if he carries out the plans that he’s talking about it would be great. So, yes I think it’s a good use of the property for a very unusual one. Weick: Yeah. Sure. McGonagill: It will add a lot to look of the lake in many ways. But I will be proposing the, some amendment on the, just so the bridge remains within a certain level of usability by fire, by emergency equipment. I’ll say it that way. And I’ll let staff sort out what it needs to look like. Weick: Fair enough. How do the rest of you feel? Von Oven: And therein lies the experience of Commissioner McGonagill because I’m sitting here racking my brain trying to figure out how we amend this thing on the fly and get that all in and he knows he can just rely on staff to do that. I’m in the same boat. It’s funny. One, what a fantastic project both from the standpoint of I’m super jealous of what you are doing. This is beautiful and what a great project. Two, it’s probably the first project that’s come through where as a commissioner I have zero fear of us setting some sort of a precedent here because we’re never going to see another property like this so, variance away here. It’s great. The third part is Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 1, 2020 26 that I’m not at all worried about the applicant and his any lack of letting that bridge deteriorate. He will have every reason in the world to ensure that emergency personnel can access that property. The reason that I will support, however Commissioner McGonagill gets this done, is for the next owner. For that owner down the road who might be renting the property out, which I am also in favor of for long term and I’m glad that provision was put it there, to just ensure that we don’t end up with a situation many, many years from now where someone is renting out the property to someone else and they’re letting the bridge deteriorate. I do not want to put any undue burden on Mr. Wicka for yearly engineering reviews of the bridge. I just don’t know how that works. But finding a way where we ensure that for the long term that very unique structure maintains safety standards without putting the undue burden on Mr. Wicka is what I would be in favor of. McGonagill: I support you in that regard. Five daughters, he’ll have 15 grandchildren pretty soon and he will want emergency personnel in there. Weick: Great. Those are great thoughts and great viewpoints. Go ahead. McGonagill: Are you ready for a recommendation? Weick: Sure. McGonagill moved, Skistad seconded for the Planning Commission to recommend approval of rezoning of the property located at 1601 Lake Lucy Road with an approximate area of 9.03 acres from Rural Residential to Planned Unit Development-Residential incorporating the attached standards and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision recommendation, including an amendment that staff will work with the property owner to develop appropriate safety standards for the continued maintenance of the bridge. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 7 to 0. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020XX: Designate Polling Place Locations for 2021 Elections Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution designating polling place locations in Chanhassen for 2021 elections.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND Minnesota State Statutes, section 204B.16, Subdivision 1 requires that by December 31st of each year, the governing body of each municipality designate by ordinance or resolution a polling place for each election precinct for the following calendar year. For 2021, the following polling places are designated for each election precinct in Chanhassen: Precinct Location 1A Chanhassen Library, 7711 Kerber Boulevard 1B Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard 2A Chanhassen Recreation Center, 2310 Coulter Boulevard 2B Chanhassen Recreation Center, 2310 Coulter Boulevard 3 Westwood Community Church, 3121 Westwood Drive 4 Chanhassen Public Works Building, 7901 Park Place 5 Country Inn & Suites, 591 West 78th Street Hennepin County 1 Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard Hennepin County 2 Chanhassen Recreation Center, 2310 Coulter Boulevard These polling locations remain unchanged from the 2020 elections. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution designating polling place locations in Chanhassen for 2021 elections. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: December 14, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACE LOCATIONS FOR 2021 ELECTIONS WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statute 204B.16 Subdivision 1 requires that by December 31 of each year, the governing body of each municipality designate by ordinance or resolution a polling place for each election precinct for the following calendar year. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, that the following polling places are designated for each election precinct in 2021: Precinct Location 1A Chanhassen Library, 7711 Kerber Boulevard 1B Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard 2A Chanhassen Recreation Center, 2310 Coulter Boulevard 2B Chanhassen Recreation Center, 2310 Coulter Boulevard 3 Westwood Community Church, 3121 Westwood Drive 4 Chanhassen Public Works Building, 7901 Park Place 5 County Inn & Suites, 591 West 78th Street Hennepin County 1 Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard Hennepin County 2 Chanhassen Recreation Center, 2310 Coulter Boulevard Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 14th day of December, 2020. ATTEST: Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Approval of Cartegraph Software Renewal Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6. Prepared By Rick Rice, IT Manager File No: PROPOSED MOTION The City Council approves the purchase of the 3 Year Cartegraph Software and Services contract. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The City purchased Cartegraph Navigator asset management software in 2010 for automation of the stormwater, water, sewer and fleet asset maintenance. This software was upgraded to their OMS version in 2017. The Streets and Parks divisions began using this software in 2019. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the renewal of the Cartegraph Software and Services contract. ATTACHMENTS: Cartegraph Renewal Aggreement * Purchase Order No. 1601.20.374 PURCHASE ORDER clrr 0f CtrTITf,ISSE 77OO MARKET BLVD., PO BOX I47 CHANHASSEN. MN 553I? 952-227 -l 140 fax 952-227 -1 110 Vendor Name 9s{99_!qphAdd.ess 3600 DigitalDr City Dubuque ST lA Zl Phone (563) 556-8120 Payment Details O checkO Castr O Account No O Credit Card Name cc# Exp Date Ship To Name City of Chanhas sen Address 7700 Market Blvd P 52003 City Chanhassen hone 952 227-1111 7zlPSt MN 0 SubTotal Shipping & Handling Taxes State TOTAL BUDGET CODE ENTER THE BUDGET CODE IN THE SHAOED AREA: See Note Above Qty Units Oescription Unit Price TOTAL Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea Ol\4S - Plus OIVS - lntegration Toolkit OMS - Scenario Builder OMS - Asset builder OMS - Users (50) OMS - Systems lntegration Support Total Amount Equally Divided Between Accounts 400-4117-4703 MtS CtP 701-70254703 Sewer Utility Fund 720-7025-4703 Surface Water LJtility Fund 700-7025-4703 Water Utility Fund $18,000.00 $688.56 $688.56 $459.04 $16,000.00 $1,050.00 $18,000.00 $688.56 $688.56 $459.04 $16,000.00 $1,050.00 $36,886.16 $36,886.16 Approval epart t Head Signatu City Manager Signatu re Notes/Remarks Order No Sales Rep Date PA-3471 Ryan Lucia Ship Via Cartegraph OMS Annual Maintenance CITY OF CHANHASSEN - 12l2l2O2O OtO0 Cartdgraph City of Chanhassen Cartegraph Software and Services Contract PA#: PA-3471 Date: 10/29/2020 Cartegraph Systems LLC 3600 Digital Drive Dubuque, lA 52003 cartegraph.com 800 688.2656 563 556.8120 Fax 563 556.8149 Purchase Agreement City of Chanhassen, N,lN 1 10129/2020 CUSTOIMER ADDRESS City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Cartdgraph Cartegraph is pleased to present this Purchase Agreement for the implementation of world class technology solutions. This Purchase Agreement is made and entered into between City of Chanhassen (hereinafter referred to as Customer) and Cartegraph Systems LLC (hereinafter referred to as Cartegraph). ln the case that any terms or conditions provided in the Cartegraph Solutions Agreement different from, are provided in more detail by, or are made irrelevant by the terms and conditions provided in this Purchase Agreement, the terms in this Purchase Agreement shall control. For all terms and conditions not addressed by this Purchase Agreement, the Cartegraph Solutlons Agreement shall control. LICENSEE ADDRESS City of Chanhassen PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 The addendums attached here to include: Addendum A - Support Services Addendum B - Amendment to Cartegraph Solutions Agreement Page 2 of 8 lnvestment Summary City of Chanhassen, L4N 1 10129/2020 Cartdgraph Product Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 OMS Plus Quantity 1.00 1.00 1.00 Price usD 18,000.00 usD 18,540.00 usD 19,096.20 Facilities Quantity 1.00 1.00 Price USD O.OO USD O.OO USD O.OO Parks & Recreation Domain Quantity 1.00 1.00 1.00 USD O.OO USD O.OO usD 0.00 Sanitary Sewer Domain 1.00 1.00 1.00 Price USD O.OO USD O.OO Stormwater Domain Quantity 1.00 Price USD O.OO USD O.OO usD 0.00 Transportation Domain Quantity 1.00 1.00 1.00 Price usD 0.00 USD O,OO Water Distribution Domain Quantity 1.00 Price usD 0.00 usD 0.00 USD O.OO Quantity 1.00 '1 .00 1.00 Price usD 688.56 usD 709.22 usD 730.50 Scenario Builder Quantity 1.00 1.00 '1 .00 Price usD 688.56 usD 709.22 usD 730.50 Asset Builder Quantity 1.00 1.00 1.00 Price usD 4s9.04 usD 472.81 usD 486.99 Page 3 of 8 '1 .00 Price Quantity usD 0.00 1.00 1.00 USD O.OO 1.00 'L00 OMS lntegration Toolkit City of Chanhassen, MN | 1012912020 TOTAL: The pricing listed above does not include applicable sales tax. The Cartegraph OMS pricing listed above does not include Esri ArcGlS licenses. Hosting includes 250G8 of available file storage. lf additional storage is required, the Organization can purchase in 1TB increments. Contract term dates. 12/31/2020-12/30/2023 Cartdgraph Product Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 OMS User Quantity 50.00 50.00 50.00 Price usD 16,000.00 usD 16,480.00 usD 16,974.40 Flood Protection Quantity 1.00 1.00 Price USD O.OO USD O.OO USD O.OO Signal Domain Quantity 1.00 1.00 1.00 Price usD 0.00 USD O.OO USD O.OO Walkability Domain Quantity 1.00 1.00 1.00 Price USD O.OO USD O.OO USD O.OO Systems lntegration Support Quantity 1.00 1.00 1.00 Price usD 1,050.00 usD 1,081.50 usD 1,113.95 usD 36,886.16 usD 37,992.75 Page 4 of 8 NOTES: 1.00 usD 39,132 54 City of Chanhassen, MN | 1012912020 Payment Terms and Conditions ln consideration for the Solutions and Services provided by Cartegraph to Customer, Custome. agrees to pay Cartegraph the Fees in U.S. Dollars as described below: IDELIVERY Customer shall be provided with the ability to access and use the Solutions upon execution of this Purchase Agreement. lf applicable, Services will be scheduled and delivered upon your acceptance of this Purchase Agreement, which will be considered as your notification to proceed. II, SERVICES SCHEDULING lf Services are purchased Cuslomer agrees to work with Cartegraph to schedule Services in a timely manner. All undelivered Services shall expire 365 days from the signing of this Purchase Agreement III SOLUI IONS INVOICING The fee for solutions will be due in annual installments 1 5 days prior to the anniversary of the initial term as follows: 1 . S36,886.1 6 due upon execution of the Purchase Agreement.2. 537 ,992.75 due 1 5 days prior to 1 st year anniversary of term start date.3. 539,132.54 due 1 5 days prior to 2nd year anniversary of term start date. Cartdgraph Page 5 of 8 IV, PAYMENT TERMS All payments are due Net 30 days from start date of invoice. City of Chanhassen, MN | 10/29/2020 BY SIGNING BELOW THE PARTIES AGREE THAT ALL USE AND ACCESS TO THE SOLUTIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE CARTEGRAPH SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT, WHICH CAN BE REVIEWED AT: httos://www.carteqraph.com/solutions- AqTEEMENI. THE PARTIES AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE CARTEGRAPH SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT AND THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT REFERENCED HEREIN Cartdgraph CARTEGRAPH Cartegraph Systems LLC By: CUSTOMER. City of Chanhassen By: (Signature)(Signature) (Type or Print Name) SVP of Sales & Marketing (Type or Print Name) Title: Date: Page 6 of 8 Title: Date: Cartegraph Systems LLC Addendum A - Support Services Cartegraph Support and Training Services - Scope of Work The Support Services listed in the lnvestment Summary of the Purchase Agteement are specific Cartegraph Services which will be delivered to the Customer based on the descriptions below and on the terms and conditions and subject to the limitations set forth in this Addendum A, the applicable Purchase Agreement, and the Cartegraph Solutions Ag.eement. Cartegraph will coordinate with the Customer on service delivery expectations and timeframes. As part of Customer's subscription to eccess and us e of the Certegtaph Sorutions, Customer will receive: 1. Support Services a, Campus - www.campus.cartegnph.com Our User Assistance area is a convenient and easily-shareable resource designed to help you and your cG workers better understand the functions and capabilities of your Cartegraph Solutions. lnstantly access user tips, step-by-step instructions, videos, and more. b. Dedicated, Unlimited, Tolbfree Phone Support - 877.647.3050 and Live Chat When questions need answers and difficulties arise, count on our industry-leading Support team to provide the guidance and assistance you need. Reach us as often as you need Monday-Friday, 7:00 am-7:00 pm CT. Live Chat is available within the product or through Campus. c. Support via Case Submitlal or Email lf a phone call or live chat is not your best option, you can always request support via our online case submittal form available in Campus or via email. Email support is available at support@cartegraph.com. 2. Training & Education Servicesa. Convenient Onrine Resources: All the information you need, one click away. Take advantage of online training opportunities, tutorial videos, upcoming event information, and more. b. Customer Led User Groups : Meet and network with similar Cartegraph users in your region. Customer led User Groups allow you to find out what other organizations are doing to get more from their Cartegraph solutions and sewices. 3. Releases & Upgrades a. IVew Releases: Cartegraph is continuously innovating and enhancing the Cartegraph 0MS collection of products. As a cuslomer with an active subscription, you wall receive each new release of the software. i. Cloud-hosted customers: Your cloud-hosted site will be upgraded by our Cartegraph System Consultants after the release is available. ii. On-premise customers: For your on-premises installation, our Technical Consultants will work with your organization s lT slaff to deliver the latest software release. Software will be made available after installation to the Cartegraph cloud-hosted customers. b. Service Packs: A Service Pack consists of lower-severity bug frxes and/or small platform updates. i. lf required, cloud-hosted sites will receive Service Packs as needed. These Service Packs are installed by the Cartegraph System Consultants. Cartdgraph Page 7 of 8 City of Chanhassen, MN | 10/29/2020 City of Chanhassen, MN | 1012912020 ii. 0n-premises customers that contacted Cartegraph Technical Support about an issue that is resolved with the Service Pack, will be provided the service pack for installation. These on-premises customers can then schedule a time to install the Service Pack with our Technical Support team c. Hot Fixes, lf an issue is determined to be a defect and falls outside the standard release cycle, Cartegraph will issue a hot fix and provide application specialists with detailed levels of product knowledge to work with you in achieving a timely and effective resolution Cartegraph will provide the Support Services only to Customer, provided that Cartegraph reserves the right to contact any third party as necessary to facilitate the delivery of Support Services or other services relating to the Solutions. Said support applies only to the most current version of lhe product and the previous version in succession. All Support Services are dependent upon the use by Customer of the Solutions in accordance with Cartegraph's documentation and specifications. Cartegraph is under no obligation to modify the Solutions so that the modified Solulions would depart from Cartegraphs published documentation and specifications for such Solutions. Cartdgraph Page 8 of 8 ADDENDUM TO CARTEGRAPH SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT, DATED MARCH 28,2018 THIS ADDENDUM is dated today', and contains terms intended to supersede and clarify the terms set forth in that certain Cartegraph Solutions Agreement, to which this Addendum is anached and incorporated by this reference. Section 8.2 is hereby amended to read 8.2 Cartegraph Data. BY EXECUTING THIS ADDENDUM CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT HAS REVIEWED THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES IN ADDITION TO ANY EXHIBITS AND PURCHASE AGREEMENTS AND CUSTOMER AGREES TO BE LEGALLY BOUND BY EACH SUCH AGREEMENT. Cartegraph Systems LLC City of Chanhassen By By (Signature)(Signature) Mitch Bradlev (Type or print name)(Type or print name) Title SVP of Sales & Marketino Tirle DateDate Notwithstanding any terms in the Solutions Agreement to the contrary, pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 13.05 subd. 1 l, all of the data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Cartegraph in performing this Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA), Minnesota Statutes Ch, 13 and Cartegraph must comply with those requirements as if il were a government entity. The Customer's treatment of data in its possession is governed by the lvlGDPA, which supersedes the confidentiality provisions in the Cartegraph Solutions Agreement to the extent they conflict. Notwithstanding any terms in the Solutions Agreement to the contrary, government records in the possession of Customer are subject to the Minnesota Government Records Act, Minn. Stat. $ 138.1 7 and may only be destroyed in accordance with Customer's approved records retention schedule. The Government Records Act and the City's record retention schedule supersede any provision of the Solutions Agreement to the extent they conflict. As between Cartegraph and Customer, Cartegraph retains ownership of all data, information, and other content provided to Customer through the Solutions and the other Services, excluding any Customer Data ("Customer Data"). Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Customer may access the Cartegraph Data without modification solely for Customer's own internal business purposes in connection with Customer's use of and access to the Solutions. Cartegraph uses commercially reasonable measures to ensure the accuracy and reliability of all Cartegraph Data, but except as expressly provided herein Cartegraph will not be responsible for any erroneous data, information, or content provided through the Solutions, Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Customer is granted no rights in or to the Cartegraph Data. Rice, Richard From: Sent: To: Subject: James Monge <JMonge@ck-law.com > Wednesday, December 9,2020 1:31 PM Rice, Richard RE: Cartegraph 3 Year Agreement Richa rd, The agreement with the addendum looks okay. James J. Mong6 Ill Atrornc) CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Om( e Cenrr. I 860 Blue Genriatr Road, Suite 290 fagan, MN tS l2l Ph(,ne: (6sl) 2]a-6201 . I.a\: (651) 2rA2l7 rnrr!\ iL/ rh li$ (,trn o s r *.,1 las ,,,.: CAMPBELL KNUTSON From: Rice, Richard <rrice@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 11:39 AM To: James Monge <JMonge@ck-law.com> Subject: RE: Cartegraph 3 Year Agreement Cartegraph agreed to the addendum you requested. I have attached their revised a8reement for your review. I do need to get this in the December 14 Council Packet which all the content is due today. From: James Monge <JM.9lge@d:!.4ry.!9-E> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 9:36 AM To: Rice,Richard <rrice@ci.cha nhassen.m n. us> Subject: Cartegraph 3 Year Agreement Hello Richard, The eight paBe Purchase Agreement references terms in a Cartegraph Solutions Agreement available at Agreement is 19 pages long. The Solutions Agreement: 1 www.cartegraph.com/solutions-agreement . That Andrea McDowell Poehler asked me to review the Cartegraph Purchase Agreement. Limits the City's remedy for failure of the technology to operate to (a) re-perform the affected Services, or (b) refund fees applicable to the portion of Solutions subject to the failure. Limits Cartegraph's liability to fees paid in 12 month period immediately preceding the event giving rise to liability. Contains confidentiality requirements that may conflict with the MGDPA and the Government Records Act (destruction or return of Confidential lnformation upon the request of the DisclosinB party). Those terms are pretty common in technology contracts. We've tried to change them in the past generally without success. We could maybe get them to agree to an addendum to the Purchase Agreement to the affect that: "Notwithsta nding any terms in the Solutions Agreement to the contrary, pursuant to Minn. Stat. S 13.05 subd. 11, all of the data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Cartegraph in performing this Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA), Minnesota Statutes Ch. 13 and Cartegraph must comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. The Customer's treatment of data in its possession is governed by the MGDPA, which supersedes the confidentiality provisions in the Caretgraph Solutions Agreement to the extent they conflict. Notwithstanding any terms in the Solutions Agreement to the contrary, government records in the possession of Customer are subject to the Minnesota Government Records Act, Minn. Stat. S 138.17 and may only be destroyed in accordance with Custome/s approved records retention schedule. The Government Records Act and the City's record retention schedule supersede any provision of the Solutions Agreement to the extent they conflict." Do you want to see if Cartegraph will make that change? James J. Mong6 III CAMPBtrLL KNUTSON, P.A. Crand ()ak Ollicc Ccntcr I t|60 Blur C.ntian Road, Suite 290 lagan, MN 55121 Phonc: (6sl) 214-6201 . l.ax: (6s l) 2l+6217 i'nonl'e(d (h li\r.(,,nr o s s \\.(k lJs.(,,n CAMPBELL KNUTSON 2 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject CARES Act Final Budget Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.7. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION Approve final allocation of the CARES funding expenditures. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The City received $1,978,887 in Federal Funding under the CARES program. The Council had previously approved a line item budget for use of the funding. The grant spending period ended November 15, 2020. The City had savings in several of the line items and was able to reallocate use of the funds to additional expenditures incurred by the City in the other approved line items. A summary of expenditures compared to budget is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Final CARES Funding Report City of Chanhassen CARES Funds Budget vs. Actual Final 11/15/2020 Budget Amended Budget Total Expenditures Uncovered EPSL and UIC Wages 29,000 47,396 47,396 Public Safety Wages & Contract 143,000 451,552 451,552 Additional Turnout Gear 110,700 58,847 58,847 Wages Paid not working 27,000 28,187 28,187 City Hall Safety Imp (glass & Cubicals)30,000 26,413 26,413 City Hall Bathroom & other Safety Improvements 5,000 18,356 18,356 Election Safety 6,000 500 500 Technology Improvements 112,100 118,680 118,680 Forced Closure Onsale Restaurant Grant 19,000 18,776 18,776 Sanitization Supplies 20,000 19,765 19,765 Masks 10,000 9,681 9,681 Door Pulls 500 706 706 Consultant costs for Hwy 5 virtual meetings public input 2,000 - - Facility Audit Reviw Contract 14,000 13,132 13,132 Design Contract for Facility Impr 145,000 80,810 80,810 Construction Contract for Facility Improvements 1,064,000 939,902 939,902 Emergency Small Business Grants 250,000 146,184 146,184 Adjust to actual allocation (8,413) - - Total 1,978,887 1,978,887 1,978,887 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Avienda Wetland Credit Purchase NOD Extension Section OLD BUSINESS Item No: F.1. Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator File No: n/a PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the extension of the Notice of Decision of the WCA Replacement Plan and sequencing flexibility with conditions for the Avienda project.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY On December 18, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council approved the WCA replacement application and sequencing flexibility with conditions for the Avienda project. On December 22, 2017, a Notice of Decision was issued to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) to formally issue this replacement plan approval decision. That decision is set to expire December 22, 2020. The applicant is requesting an extension of that deadline until December, 2023. The scope of the project has not changed in any way and the wetland replacement credits have already been purchased. BACKGROUND In 2017, Level 7 Development, LLC, applied for a WCA permit with the City of Chanhassen as the LGU for the WCA for the proposed Avienda project. The project is a 115acre development project for a Regional Lifestyle Center. The developer is proposing to impact 4.5878 acres of WCA regulated wetland. There is also 1,429 square feet of waterway impact, but this is not regulated by WCA as it is not a WCA wetland. Wetland mitigation is proposed through the purchase of wetland bank credit. Three banks and one backup bank have been identified. These banks are within the same Bank Service Area (BSA) as the project. The applicant has secured these credits and obtained Withdrawal Transaction Forms to withdraw credits from the wetland banks. On December 22, 2017, a Notice of Decision was issued on behalf of the City of Chanhassen, as LGU for the WCA for the project. This Decision is valid for three years, and as such, is set to expire on December 22, 2020. In November 2020, the applicant requested an extension of this Notice of Decision, which would extend the expiration date on the decision by another three years. After reviewing the information provided by the applicant, a Findings of Fact document was prepared and sent to the TEP to provide an opportunity to comment and make recommendations on this proposed deadline extension. Given that the project was previously approved through the Chanhassen City Council and the Wetland Conservation Act permitting process, that the scope of the project and proposed wetland impacts and mitigation have not changed CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectAvienda Wetland Credit Purchase NOD ExtensionSectionOLD BUSINESS Item No: F.1.Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Water ResourcesCoordinator File No: n/aPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the extension of the Notice of Decision of the WCA Replacement Plan and sequencingflexibility with conditions for the Avienda project.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn December 18, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council approved the WCA replacement application and sequencingflexibility with conditions for the Avienda project. On December 22, 2017, a Notice of Decision was issued to theTechnical Evaluation Panel (TEP) to formally issue this replacement plan approval decision. That decision is set toexpire December 22, 2020. The applicant is requesting an extension of that deadline until December, 2023. The scopeof the project has not changed in any way and the wetland replacement credits have already been purchased. BACKGROUNDIn 2017, Level 7 Development, LLC, applied for a WCA permit with the City of Chanhassen as the LGU for theWCA for the proposed Avienda project. The project is a 115acre development project for a Regional LifestyleCenter. The developer is proposing to impact 4.5878 acres of WCA regulated wetland. There is also 1,429 squarefeet of waterway impact, but this is not regulated by WCA as it is not a WCA wetland. Wetland mitigation is proposedthrough the purchase of wetland bank credit. Three banks and one backup bank have been identified. These banksare within the same Bank Service Area (BSA) as the project. The applicant has secured these credits and obtainedWithdrawal Transaction Forms to withdraw credits from the wetland banks. On December 22, 2017, a Notice of Decision was issued on behalf of the City of Chanhassen, as LGU for the WCAfor the project. This Decision is valid for three years, and as such, is set to expire on December 22, 2020. InNovember 2020, the applicant requested an extension of this Notice of Decision, which would extend the expirationdate on the decision by another three years. After reviewing the information provided by the applicant, a Findings ofFact document was prepared and sent to the TEP to provide an opportunity to comment and make recommendationson this proposed deadline extension. Given that the project was previously approved through the Chanhassen City Council and the Wetland Conservation Act permitting process, that the scope of the project and proposed wetland impacts and mitigation have not changed in any way, and that credits purchasing agreements have already been secured, the LGU Finds and Recommends that the Notice of Decision be extended. The TEP agreed with this determination and have signed the Findings of Fact document. That document is attached to this Staff Report. It should be noted that the the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District does not support the NOD extension. Their comments remain unchanged from the original Wetland Replacement Plan Application. Full comments from the District are attached to this staff report. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approving the Notice of Decision timeline extension for the WCA replacement plan for the Avienda project. ATTACHMENTS: TEP Findings of Fact document RPBCWD Comments Original Notice of Decision City Council Presentation x 11/18/2020 11 / 18 / 2020 x 1 Unmacht, Matt From:Terry Jeffery <tjeffery@rpbcwd.org> Sent:Thursday, November 19, 2020 8:04 PM To:Unmacht, Matt; Carlson, Ben (BWSR); Ryan.M.Malterud@usace.army.mil; Melissa Barrett Cc:Claire Bleser; Aanenson, Kate Subject:Avienda replacement plan extension Matt, The RPBCWD comments remain unchanged from the original application. The RPBCWD rejects the supposition that the functions and values of wetlands within the Lake Susan (Riley Creek) and Bluff Creek watersheds can be mitigated with the purchase of banking credits in Rice, Blue Earth, Stevens, and Lyon Counties. The RPBCWD also rejects the supposition that sequencing flexibility requirements specified in MR 8420.0520 Subp. 7a were appropriately applied. This position of disagreement is based upon the reason stated above – replacement wetland located outside of the Bluff Creek and Lake Susan (Riley Creek) watersheds cannot, with any reasonable consideration, be expected to provide greater functions and values than the wetlands impacted if they are not within the same watershed. By the logic applied, mitigation areas in western Illinois or eastern Missouri would be acceptable as they are within the larger Mississippi watershed. As with the original decision, RPBCWD strongly disagrees with the decision of the TEP . Since we do not agree that the original decision accurately applied MN statute, RPBCWD does not support the extension of the replacement plan approval. Regards, Terry The District continues to take every precaution to keep employees, volunteers, and visitors healthy and safe, and minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus. The office is now closed to visitors, and staff are working from home. To reach a specific staff person, please reach out to them directly. Contact info can be found on our website: rpbcwd.org/about-watershed and additional information about our back to work plan: http://rpbcwd.org/application/files/9415/9128/7885/COVID_Return_to_work_action_plan.pdf BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) City of Chanhassen Address 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Level 7 Development, LLC (c/o Mark Nordland) 8315 Cascade Drive – Suite 165 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Project Name Avienda Date of Application March 14, 2017 Application Number 07-01WRP Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: Wetland Boundary or Type No-Loss Exemption Sequencing Replacement Plan Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation (if any): Approve Approve with conditions Deny Summary (or attach): The TEP met on November 20, 2017. The TEP reviewed the request for sequencing flexibility. Based on the requirements in MR8420.0520 Subp 7a, the TEP agreed the application met the requirements for sequencing flexibility. An email from Ben Carlson (BWSR) is attached. TEP Findings of Fact are also attached. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: December 18, 2017 Approved Approved with conditions (include below) Denied 1. The approximately 20-acre Bluff Overlay District in the southwest of the project area be preserved in perpetuity through a conservation easement. 2. A $300,000 escrow be provided by the applicant for a future wetland/stormwater improvement project in the city. 3. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature. 4. Provide proof of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. 5. Engineering plans of the design of the stormwater system that at least meets the outcomes of the stormwater model provided with the WCA application be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to grading. LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 A. Overview of Project Level 7 Developm ent, LLC, has applied for a W etland Conservation Act (W CA) perm it with the City of Chanhassen as the Local Governm ent Unit (LGU) for the W CA for the proposed Avienda project. T he project is a 115-acre developm ent project for a Regional Lifestyle Center . The developer is proposing to im pact 4.5878 acres of W CA regulated wetland. There is also 1,429 square feet of waterway im pact, but this is not regulated b y W CA as it is not a W CA wetland. Wetland mitigation is proposed through the purchase of wetland bank credit. Three banks and one back-up bank have been identified. These banks are within the same Bank Service Area (BSA) as the project. 1. Applicant subm itted application Februar y 15, 2017 with prelim inary storm water m odel ing inform ation on F ebruar y 21, 2017. (Wetland Permit Application, January 12, 2017). 2. City determ ined application was incom plete on March 10, 2017. This determ ination was reviewed with the applicant on March 9, 2017. (WSB Memo dated March 10, 2017). 3. Applicant subm itted revisions on March 14, 2017. (Kjolhaug memo dated March 14, 2017). 4. City determ ined the application was com plete on March 17, 2017. A W etland Conservation Act Notice of Application (NOA) was sent to the TEP on March 17, 2017. While the application was technically complete, the NOA and Application checklist indicated that the applicant may want to provide additional supporting information to allow the LGU to review the application for conformance with WCA. (WCA Notice of Application dated March 17, 2017). 5. T he first 60-day tim eline ended Ma y 13, 2017. The LGU extended that tim eline in writing for 60 additional days. The LGU indicated that if the applicant wanted to extend the timeline again, the Cit y needed this extension in writing. The following summarizes the subsequent extensions. Date of Extension Notice Date Extension Expires First 60-Day Timeline May 13, 2017 Second 60-Day Timeline – April 21, 2017 July 12, 2017 June 19, 2017 September 10, 2017 September 6, 2017 October 10, 2017 October 3, 2017 December 10, 2017 November 20, 2017 February 8, 2018 6. On June 5, the applicant submitted information to the US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and copied the City in response to the COE comments. (Kjolhaug memo dated June 5, 2017 with attachments). 7. The TEP, City staff, applicant, and staff from Riley -Purgatory Bluff Creek met on July 11, 2017 to review the application and project. (The TEP includes staff from the Board of Water and Soil Resources, the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the LGU. The purpose of the TEP is to provide guidance on WCA items, if requested by the LGU to do so). As a result of that meeting, information was clarified by the applicant. The LGU and TEP indicated they were still awaiting other information. The meeting notes from that meeting are attached. (WSB Memo Dated July 21, 2017 and Revised August 1, 2017 to reflect review and comment of the meeting attendees). 8. The applicant submitted additional information to the City on the October 9, 2017 with revised project plans. The project proposes to im pact 4.5878 acres of wetland. This is a reduction of 0.309 acres of impac t from the original application. (Kjolhaug memo dated October 9, 2017). BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 T able 1. Summary of Proposed Wetland Impacts Wetland Number Wetland Type Wetland Acreage Impact Acreage (fill and excavate) Fill or Excavate Wetland Management Class Wetland 1 1, 3 1.1001 1.1001 F Manage 2 Wetland 1/2 1, 2 0.1860 0.1860 F Manage 2 Wetland 2 1, 2, 5 2.2569 2.2569 F Manage 2 Wetland 3 1 0.6696 0 NA Manage 2 Wetland 4 1 0.1253 0 NA Manage 2 Wetland 5 1 0.3483 0.3483 F Manage 3 Wetland 6 1 0.5302 0.4986 F Manage 2 Wetland 6 1 0.2514 0 Manage 2 Wetland 7 1 0.0150 0.0150 F Manage 3 Wetland 8 1 0.0844 0.0844 F Manage 3 Wetland 9 1 0.0985 0.0985 F Manage 3 Wetland 10 1 0.0740 0 NA Preserve TOTAL 5.6406 4.5878 9. On October 26, 2017, the applicant submitted a revised application to the US Corps of Engineers (COE) pertaining to reduced jurisdictional status of the COE wetlands as well as reduced wetland impacts. This submittal contained the grading plan which also informed the WCA review. (Kjolhaug memo dated October 26, 2017). 10. On November 20, 2017, the applicant submitted a request and supporting information for sequencing flexibility within the WCA rules. This submittal, along with the October 9, 2017 memo responding to the TEP meeting from July and a memo dated June 5, 2017 responding to COE comments, was provided to the TEP and other s for review and comment on November 20, 2017. Revised stormwater modeling and analysis accompanied this memo. (Kjolhaug memo dated November 20, 2017 ; Draft Stormwater Management Plan – DP5.5 dated November 20, 2017 ). 11. On November 30, 2017, members of the TEP and City staff met to review the sequencing flexibility request. At this meeting, the TEP reviewed and discussed that the applicant appeared to meet the sequencing flexibility in WCA and acknowledged that the project was still out for comments and the stormwater review was still pending from the City. An email from BWSR staff is attached to this memo that documents BWSR’s comments on the application and that they support the sequencing flexibility application. (Email dated December 1, 2017 from Ben Car lson, BWSR TEP member). 12. A revised draft stormwater management plan and model was provided for review on December 11, 2017 based on questions from WSB during the review period. (Draft Stormwater Management Plan – DP5.5 dated December 11, 2017 ). 13. Comments were received from the Riley -Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) on December 7, 2017. (Riley-Purgatory Bluff Creek letter dated December 7, 2017). 14. A response from the applicant was received on December 13, 2017 in response to RPBCWD comments. (Larkin Hoffman memo dated December 13, 2018). B. WCA Review and Findings 1. Wetland Boundary, T ype and Classification: The LGU reviewed the wetland delineation, typing, and MnRAM classifications. This inform ation is summ arized below. The LGU and T EP concurred with the wetland delineation, wetland t yping, and MnRAM classifications as noted below and in the application. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 4 of 3 T able 2. Wetland Type and M anagement Classification Summary 2016 Application City's Plan 2014 Report Cowardi n Ci rcul ar 39 Manage me nt Cl ass Manage me nt Cl ass Cowardin Circular 39 Wetl and 1 PEMAd T1 M2 M2 PEMB T2 PEMCd T3 Wetl and 2 PUBG T5 M2 M2 PEMB T2 PEMBd T2 PUBFx T4 PEMAd T1 Wetl and 3 PEMA T1 M2 M3 PEMB T2 Wetl and 4 PEMAd T1 M2 PEMB T2 Wetl and 5 PEMAd T1 M3 PEMA T1 Wetl and 6 PEMAd T1 M2 M2 PFO1A T1 Wetl and 7/8 PEMAd T1 M3 Wetl and 9 PEMAd T1 M3 Wetl and 10 PFO1A T1 P Findings: The LGU and TEP concur with the wetland boundary, type, and management classification as outlined in the current application and summarized in the Table 2. 2. Sequencing Flexibility The applicant has requested sequencing flexibility pursuant to Minnesota Ru les 8420.0520 Subp 7a. Flexibility in application of the sequencing steps (i.e. avoid and minimize impacts) may be allowed at the discretion of the Local Government Unit subject to one of the following conditions. If sequencing flexibility is allowed, the requirements of MR 8420.0520 Subp 1-7 that require specific avoidance and minimization criteria do not apply. Below is a review of whether the applicant has met one of these conditions to be eligible for sequencing flexibility. Subpart 7a. A.1. Sequencing flexibility can be allowed by the LGU if the wetland impacted has been degraded to the point where replacement of it would result in a certain gain in function and public value. Findings: A Minnesota Routine Assessment Method (MnRAM) assessmen t is a State approved method for evaluating the functions and values of wetlands. Based on the results of a MnRAM assessment, wetlands are classified as Preserve, Manage 1, Manage 2, or Manage 3, with the highest functions and values in the Preserve category and the lowest functions and values in the Manage 3 category. The MnRAM assessment has been completed for the on -site wetlands as well as the proposed wetland bank wetlands, which are proposed for wetland mitigation. Some of the on-site wetlands (Wetlands 1, 2, 5, 9) have been degraded from agricultural activities and apparent manipulation such as grading (as evidenced from the aerial photos). The on-site wetlands are Manage 2s and 3s as noted in the Table 2 above. The MnRAM assessments of the wetland bank sites show that the proposed wetland replacement is of better function and value than wetlands proposed to be impacted. The wetland bank sites are ranked as Preserve. The TEP concurred that, based on the MnRAM assessments, the replacement wetlands would result in a gain in function and value within the same Bank Service Area (BSA). This meets the requirements of WCA so sequencing flexibility is met. While the WCA requires wetlands to be replaced in the same Bank Service Area and the project meets this requirement, the city acknowledges lost functions and values within the City of Chanhassen. Therefore, the C ity is requiring an escrow of $300,000 to fund a future wetland/water quality project in the city. Three possible projects have been identified at this time. Subpart 7a.A.2. Sequencing flexibility can be allowed by the LGU if avoidance of a wetland would result in severe degradation of the wetland’s ability to function and provide public value. This could occur if surrounding land uses or implementation of BMP’s cannot reaso nably maintain the wetland’s ability to provide functions and values. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 5 of 3 Findings: While some information related to the difficulty to maintain the existing function and value of the on-site wetlands was alluded to in the original application (Page 19 of January 12, 2017 application), the applicant has not supplied further documentation regarding this item. Therefore, this item does not apply. Subpart 7a.A.3. Sequencing flexibility can be allowed by the LGU if the only feasible and prudent upland site available for the project or replacement has greater ecosystem function and public value than the wetland. This may be appropriate only if the applicant demonstrates impact minimization to the wetland agrees to perpetually preserve the designated update site, and completely replaces the impacted wetland’s functions and values. Findings: There is a, approximately 20-acre high quality wooded area in the southwest portion of the project site. The area is designated as the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD). This area provides ecosystem value to the area by protecting the bluff and providing a high quality, vegetated wooded area that contains a diversity of native vegetation (red and bur oak, sugar maple, basswood, American elm, and black cherry that appear to hav e not been clear cut based on aerial photos that go back to 1940. The area will be placed into a perpetual conservation easement to preserve it in perpetuity. Additionally, alternatives supplied by the applicant indicate alternative sites either have simil ar or potentially greater ecosystem impact. The TEP concurred with this finding and this project meets the requirements of WCA for sequencing flexibility for this subpart. Subpart 7a.A.4. Sequencing flexibility can be allowed by the LGU if the wetland i s a site where human health and safety is a factor. Findings: Health and human safety of the wetlands being impacted is not a factor. This condition does not apply. Subpart 7a.B. Flexibility in the order and application of sequencing standards must not b e implemented unless alternatives have been considered and the proposed replacement wetland is certain to provide equal or greater public values. Findings: In the February 15, 2017 documentation, the applicant provides an alternatives analysis that look s at alternative locations within the city as well as alternative configurations for development within the chosen project site. In sections 5.2 and 5.3 of the Avienda Wetland Permit Application dated January 12, 2017 (and resubmitted February 15, 2017), two avoidance alternatives are provided. One is the no-build and the other is a development plan that avoids wetland impacts. The applicant also provided alternative site alternatives. The alternative sites either had similar impacts or greater impacts to wetlands or natural resources. Alternatives have been considered. Regarding if the replacement wetland, as stated in B.2 above, the applicant has completed MnRAM assessments of the on-site and replacement wetlands. The information has been reviewed by the TEP. The information indicates that the replacement wetlands will provide greater function and value than the existing wetlands within the same BSA. The applicant will also provide a $300,000 escrow to fund a future wetland/water quality project within the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek watershed. Additionally, the stormwater management plan has been reviewed. Based on the review of the Draft Stormwater Management Plan – DP5.5 dated November 20, 2017, there were questions regarding the nondegradation analysis and the hydrology analysis for some of wetlands. These questions were brought to the applicant and changes were made to the design. Based on the review of the Draft Stormwater Management Plan – DP5.5 dated December 11, 2017, these questions were addressed. This review has taken into account the hydrology impacts and water quality impacts on the remaining wetlands (Wetland 3, 4, and 6) as w ell as the downstream MnDOT wetlands. Based on the stormwater management plan, the project plan will not negatively impact the remaining on -site or downstream MnDOT wetlands from a hydrological or water quality perspective. It is important to note that BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 6 of 3 this review was based on WCA requirements, and not requirements that may need to be met by other permitting agencies. Therefore, this subpart of the sequencing flexibility has been met. Water Quality and Nondegradation The project area is within the Lake Sus an watershed and the Bluff Creek watershed. These receiving waters are listed as impaired and as such need to show the project meets nondegradation standards. While detailed engineering design plans have not been provided, the modeling of the design plans indicates the project will meet the nondegradation requirements. The engineering plans will need to meet the results provided in the model. The data below is based on WSB’s review of the model. LAKE SUSAN City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable Subwatershed Average Flow Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable Flow within P8 Surface Outflow** [ac][ac-ft][ac-ft per ac][ac][ac-ft][ac-ft] LS 2-1 28.96 42.1 1.45 30.7 44.6 LS 2-2 51.03 68.4 1.34 5.4 7.2 LS 2-4 57.39 41.5 0.72 3.6 2.6 TOTALS 39.7 54.5 13.03 Meeting Requirement BLUFF CREEK City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable Flow 2020 Subwatershed Average Flow Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable Flow within Subwatershe P8 Surface Outflow** [ac][ac-ft][ac-ft per ac][ac][ac-ft][ac-ft] BC-A5.11 102.15 148.6 1.45 50.3 73.2 BC-A5.2 35.38 49.8 1.41 16.2 22.8 BC-A5.7 53.75 51.6 0.96 4.5 4.3 TOTALS 71 100.3 10.41 Meeting Requirement *Estimates were determined from georeferencing documents into ArcGIS and should not be considered exact ** Determined only comparing the surface outflow and using the reported drainage areas from page 8 of the stormwater management plan LAKE SUSAN City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable TSS 2020 Subwatershed Average TSS Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable TSS within Subwatershe P8 Surface Outflow TSS** [ac][lbs][lbs per ac][ac][lbs][lbs] LS 2-1 28.96 10967 378.69 30.7 11625.9 LS 2-2 51.03 17605 344.99 5.4 1863.0 LS 2-4 57.39 10252 178.64 3.6 643.1 TOTALS 39.7 14132.0 356.1 Meeting Requirement BLUFF CREEK City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable TSS 2020 Subwatershed Average TSS Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable TSS within Subwatershe d P8 Surface Outflow TSS** [ac][lbs][lbs per ac][ac][lbs][lbs] BC-A5.11 102.15 38263 374.58 50.3 18841.2 BC-A5.2 35.38 12876 363.93 16.2 5895.7 BC-A5.7 53.75 13017 242.18 4.5 1089.8 TOTALS 71 25826.7 522.2 Meeting Requirement *Estimates were determined from georeferencing documents into ArcGIS and should not be considered exact ** Determined only comparing the surface outflow and using the reported drainage areas from page 8 of the stormwater management plan BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 7 of 3 Hydrology Based on a review of the hydrology imp acts (see table below), the project will not significantly alter or negatively impact the hydrology of the remaining on - site wetlands (Wetland 3, 4, and 6) nor the downstream MnDOT wetlands. It should be noted that Wetland 3 is proposed to have a culvert o utlet placed at the elevation of the existing wetland (about 921). In practice, the wetland is expected to remain at that elevation or up to one foot about that elevation. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to negatively impact the hydrology of the wetland. LAKE SUSAN City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable TP 2020 Subwatershed Average TP Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable TP within Subwatershe P8 Surface Outflow TP** [ac][lbs][lbs per ac][ac][lbs][lbs] LS 2-1 28.96 36.7 1.27 30.7 38.9 LS 2-2 51.03 59.4 1.16 5.4 6.3 LS 2-4 57.39 34.8 0.61 3.6 2.2 TOTALS 39.7 47.4 4.9 Meeting Requirement BLUFF CREEK City's Non-Degradation Summary Proposed Site Information Subwatershe d Name Subwatershe d Area Subwatershe d Max Allowable TP 2020 Subwatershed Average TP Estimate of Area within Subwatershed* Max Allowable TP within Subwatershe d P8 Surface Outflow TP** [ac][lbs][lbs per ac][ac][lbs][lbs] BC-A5.11 102.15 128.4 1.26 50.3 63.2 BC-A5.2 35.38 43.1 1.22 16.2 19.7 BC-A5.7 53.75 44 0.82 4.5 3.7 TOTALS 71 86.6 6.9 Meeting Requirement *Estimates were determined from georeferencing documents into ArcGIS and should not be considered exact ** Determined only comparing the surface outflow and using the reported drainage areas from page 8 of the stormwater management plan BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 8 of 3 C. Approval and Conditions Based on the review of the project for conformance with the Wetland Conservation Act, the project meets the requirements for sequencing flexibility. The City Council approved this application and replacement plan with the conditions below. These conditions must be met before wetland impact can occur: 1. The approximately 20-acre Bluff Overlay District in the southwest of the project area be preserved in perpetuity through a conservation easement. 2. A $300,000 escrow b e provided by the applicant for a future wetland/stormwater improvement project in the city. 3. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature. Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change 2-year 10-year 2-year 10-year 2-year 10-year [cfs][cfs][cfs][cfs][cfs][cfs] Wetland 6 6.66 18.19 7.02 19.17 0.36 0.98 Wetland 3 9.36 19.05 9.29 17.06 -0.07 -1.99 Wetland 4 31.63 62.79 16.01 41.71 -15.62 -21.08 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)84.57 174.15 56.81 158.25 -27.76 -15.90 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)20.86 54.97 20.59 53.65 -0.27 -1.32 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change 2-year 10-year 2-year 10-year 2-year 10-year [af][af][af][af][af][af] Wetland 6 0.79 1.86 1.46 2.95 0.67 1.09 Wetland 3 0.74 1.45 0.77 1.40 0.02 -0.05 Wetland 4 3.18 6.06 4.09 6.64 0.92 0.58 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)11.84 22.39 11.94 23.27 0.10 0.88 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)9.26 18.41 10.36 20.14 1.10 1.73 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change NWL 2-year HWL 10-year HWL NWL 2-year HWL 10-year HWL NWL 2-year HWL 10-year HWL Wetland 6 884 885.35 885.49 884 885.47 885.64 0.00 0.12 0.15 Wetland 3 920.80 921.68 921.97 920.80 921.36 921.63 0.00 -0.32 -0.34 Wetland 4 884.03 884.71 884.92 884.03 884.54 884.79 0.00 -0.17 -0.13 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)869.50 870.49 871.29 869.50 870.49 871.33 0.00 0.00 0.04 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)891.00 891.68 892.56 891.00 891.78 892.70 0.00 0.10 0.14 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change 2-year event 10-year event 2-year event 10-year event 2-year event 10-year event Wetland 6 1.35 1.49 1.47 1.64 0.12 0.15 Wetland 3 0.88 1.17 0.56 0.83 -0.32 -0.34 Wetland 4 0.68 0.89 0.51 0.76 -0.17 -0.13 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)0.99 1.79 0.99 1.83 0.00 0.04 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)0.68 1.56 0.78 1.70 0.10 0.14 Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Change 2-year event 10-year event 2-year event 10-year event 2-year event 10-year event [hr][hr][hr][hr][hr][hr] Wetland 6 12 13 14 14 2.00 1.00 Wetland 3 23 24 23.00 24.00 Wetland 4 13 14 19 20 6.00 6.00 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M9)187 213 211 243 24.00 30.00 Downstream Wetland (MNDOT M10)194 227 198 233 4.00 6.00 *Criteria used to determine duration: Start at the time elevation goes above the NWL Duration continues until elevation returns to within one tenth of a foot above the NWL Inflow Volume Discharge Rates Entering Wetlands Bounce Duration* Water Levels Bounce BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 9 of 3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account # 1494 - Drummer 1605 – Schmidgall 174 – Ryan 1636 – Kremer (back up bank) Bank Service Area BSA 9 BSA 9 BSA 9 BSA 9 County Blue Earth Stevens Rice Lyon Credits Approved for Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) 261,360 sf 108,900 sf 65,000 sf TOTAL: 435,260 sf. This is more credit than the 399,689.12 sf needed. The applicant will need to submit corrected and updated Bank Withdrawal forms reflecting the 399,689.12 sf of banking credits. Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR “Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants” and “Consent to Replacement Wetland” forms have been filed with the county recorder’s office in which the replacement wetland is located. Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Andrea Moffatt Title Senior Environmental Scientist Signature Date 12/22/2017 Phone Number and E-mail 763-287-7196 amoffatt@wsbeng.com THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT . Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. 4. Provide proof of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. 5. Engineering plans of the design of the stormwater system that at least meets the outcomes of the stormwater model provided with the WCA application be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to grading. BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 10 of 3 Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal , the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition and $ fee (if applicable) to: Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES SWCD TEP member: afinke@co.carver.mn.us BWSR TEP member: ben.carlson@state.mn.us LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): DNR TEP member: Becky.Horton@state.mn.us DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) WD or WMO (if applicable): kwold@barr.com, cbleser@rpbcwd.org, tjeffery@rpbcwd.org Applicant and Landowner (if different) Melissa@kjolhaugenv.com; plarson@larkinhoffman.com; mnordland@launchproperties.com; mkjol@kjolhaugenv.com; ssabraski@landform.net Members of the public who requested notice: Corps of Engineers Project Manager Ryan.M.Malterud@usace.army.mil BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢ For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA_areas.pdf ➢ For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TEP_contacts.pdf ➢ Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE Bemidji, MN 56601 NE Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1201 E. Hwy. 2 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Central Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr_regions.pdf ➢ For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 ➢ For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 11 of 3 Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: TEP Findings of Fact and BWSR email Signed City Resolution Table 1. Revised Wetland Impact Summary for USACE Regulated Impacts Wetland Revised Proposed Impact (ac) Impact Type USACE Regulated USACE Regulated Impact (ac) Wetlands 1 1.1001 Fill No 0Wetland 1/2 0.1860 Fill No 0Wetland 2 2.2569 Fill No 0Wetland 4 -- -- Yes 0Wetland 5 0.3483 Fill No 0Wetland 6 0.4986 Fill Yes 0.4986Wetland 7 0.0150 Fill No 0Wetland 8 0.0844 Fill No 0Wetland 9 0.0985 Excavate No 0Total 0.4986 Figure 1 - Site Location & Property Boundary Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-030)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 750 Feet Legend Property Boundary MnDOT ROW (adjacent to site) Source: MnGeo, ESRI Imagery Basemap Residential Development Residential Development ResidentialDevelopment Trunk Highway 212Lyman Boulevard Powers BoulevardParcel within property boundary (1.66-ac). Not proposed for development at this time. 916914 912 918920 910908906 9 0 4 902 900898 896894 892890888 886884 922924926928930882932880934936946 878 938 940 876 942 944 874 872 870948 950952954956958 890 89492 8 916 944 920898934 9428789 0 0946924 950 902 938934936 914 930910884 916926936 912932 916954 920932 952 9308749069 2 4 922 918 950 938 934 908892 932 916 914 886 876936 896 934 906942 930 918940 912 904946 926 930 940 874 9 2 4 918938 910 900910906 938 948 914 872 936898 9 0 6 928 9049149149 2 6940 902924928 934874934952948 918914 954 930916896 920946 944 896912900888 936908 9108 8 4924938 8929 2 2 944 912 91 6 902894 928926 904 902932 898922 938 920870Figure 3 - Topographic Elevations (2016 Metro Aerial) Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-030)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 250 Feet Legend Proposed Site Wetlands MnDOT Wetland Waterway Intermittent Drainageway Ag Tile Carver Co 2-ft Lidar Source: MnGeo, ESRI Imagery Basemap 950-ft 924-ft 908-ft 912-ft 938-ft 932-ft932-ft894-ft886-ft926-ft 930-ft910-ft906-ft906-ft 900-ft892-ft924-ft 914-ft936-ft 8 8 6 - f t 876-ft 916-ft9 0 0 - f t 902-ft946-ft912-ft930-ft946-ft 936-ft 902-ft Figure 4 - Minor Watershed Boundaries (2016 Metro Aerial) Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-030)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 250 Feet Legend Proposed Site Wetlands MnDOT Wetland Waterway Intermittent Drainageway Minor Watershed Divide Source: MnGeo, ESRI Imagery Basemap WL6 WL3 2016 WL9 WL5 WL4 WL2 WL1WL1/2 WL7 WL8 WL10 Lake Susan &Riley CreekWatershed Bluff CreekWatershed Source: www.mngeo.state.mn.us Figure 5 - Existing Drainage Areas (2016 Metro Aerial) Avienda Mixed Use Regional/Lifestyle Center (KES 2015-130)Chanhassen, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 250 Feet Legend Proposed Site Drainage Areas (DA) Sub Drainage Area (SDA) Surface Drainage Direction Wetlands MnDOT Wetland Source: MnGeo, ESRI Imagery Basemap WL6 DA17.48-ac WL1/2 DA31.12-ac WL8 DA3.85-ac WL7 DA4.81-ac DA2.56-ac WL3 DA7.14-ac WL5 DA5.55-ac DA12.61-acDA28.83-ac DA3.62-ac DA2.36-ac WL9 SDA3.36-ac WL10 SDA0.55-ac WL4 SDA1.14-ac 12/18/17 Avienda Wetland Replacement Plan Notice of Decision Extension Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator Avienda Project •The Avienda project is a 115- acre development project for a Regional Lifestyle Center in Chanhassen. •Multi-use development including retail, housing, and office space. •Many wetlands exist on the project site. Wetland History •Development on the site includes 4.5878 acres of Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) jurisdictional wetland impact. •Mitigation is required at a 2:1 ratio and is proposed through the purchase of wetland bank credits. •A Wetland Replacement Plan application was submitted to the City on February 15, 2017. Wetland Replacement Plan •After much back and forth with the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) and other related parties regarding sequencing and wetland mitigation, the Chanhassen City Council approved the WCA replacement plan on December 18, 2017. •Subsequently, on December 22, 2017 a Notice of Decision (NOD) was issued to the TEP to formally issue this replacement plan approval decision. •This decision is set to expire on December 22, 2020. •The applicant is requesting an extension of that deadline. •It should be noted that the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District opposed this decision. Findings of Fact •In order to determine if the Notice of Decision should be extended, a Findings of Fact document was created and sent to the TEP to obtain comments and/or recommendations on the extension request. •In addition, comments were solicited from non-TEP interested parties, including the Watershed District, the DNR, and the US Army Corps of Engineers. •The Findings of Fact showed that because the scope of the project had not changed in any way, the project had been previously approved, and that the wetland credits have already been purchased, that the Notice of Decision should be extended until December 22, 2023. •The members of the TEP agreed with this determination and offered no additional comments. •The Findings of Fact document has been signed by the members of the TEP and can be found in your staff report. •The Watershed District did provide comments on the proposed NOD extension. Those comments reflect the same opinion of the District from the original 2017 decision and are included in your staff report. Questions/Comments? Proposed Motion “The City Council approves the extension of the Notice of Decision of the WCA Replacement Plan and sequencing flexibility with conditions for the Avienda development project.” CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Approval of OnSale Brewer Tap Room and Small Brewer OffSale Liquor Licenses Chanhassen Brewery Company located at 951 West 78th Street Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ CHANHASSEN BREWING COMPANY PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the request for an onsale brewer tap room and a small brewer offsale liquor license from Chanhassen Brewing Company, LLC, dba Chanhassen Brewing Company.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY This office has received a request for an onsale tap room and a small brewer offsale license from Chanhassen Brewing Company, LLC dba Chanhassen Brewing Company. This will be a new brewery that will occupy approximately 2519 square feet located at 952 West 78th Street (formerly the Perkin's Restaurant). The brewery will seat 165 inside and there is seating for another 28 on the attached outdoor patio. The applicant will be required to comply with city code as it relates to fencing and liquor service on the outdoor patio. The restaurant is anticipated to open January 15, 2021. BACKGROUND Law Enforcement conducted a background investigation, including criminal history, driving records, outstanding warrants, financial, and references on Matthew Rosati and Laura Rosati, equal partners of Chanhassen Brewing Company, LLC. No negative comments were found. A public hearing notice was published in the Chanhassen Villager on December 3, 2020 and sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the site (see attached affidavit of mailing). As of the date of this writing, staff has not received any comments from the public. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the request for an onsale tap room and offsale small brewery liquor license from Chanhassen Brewing Company, LLC, dba Chanhassen Brewing Company contingent upon receipt of liquor liability insurance associated with the application. Approval of this license requires a simple majority vote of the council. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectApproval of OnSale Brewer Tap Room and Small Brewer OffSale Liquor Licenses Chanhassen Brewery Company located at 951 West 78th StreetSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1.Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ CHANHASSEN BREWINGCOMPANYPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the request for an onsale brewer tap room and a small brewer offsale liquor licensefrom Chanhassen Brewing Company, LLC, dba Chanhassen Brewing Company.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThis office has received a request for an onsale tap room and a small brewer offsale license from ChanhassenBrewing Company, LLC dba Chanhassen Brewing Company. This will be a new brewery that will occupyapproximately 2519 square feet located at 952 West 78th Street (formerly the Perkin's Restaurant). The brewery willseat 165 inside and there is seating for another 28 on the attached outdoor patio. The applicant will be required tocomply with city code as it relates to fencing and liquor service on the outdoor patio. The restaurant is anticipated toopen January 15, 2021.BACKGROUNDLaw Enforcement conducted a background investigation, including criminal history, driving records, outstandingwarrants, financial, and references on Matthew Rosati and Laura Rosati, equal partners of Chanhassen BrewingCompany, LLC. No negative comments were found.A public hearing notice was published in the Chanhassen Villager on December 3, 2020 and sent to all propertyowners within 500 feet of the site (see attached affidavit of mailing). As of the date of this writing, staff has notreceived any comments from the public.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the City Council approve the request for an onsale tap room and offsale small brewery liquorlicense from Chanhassen Brewing Company, LLC, dba Chanhassen Brewing Company contingent upon receipt of liquor liability insurance associated with the application. Approval of this license requires a simple majority vote of the council. ATTACHMENTS: Property Report Card Chanhassen Retail 3rd Addition Plat Floor Plan Building Renderings Affidavit of Mailing of Public Hearing Notice Property Card Parcel ID Number 251670010 Taxpayer Information T r ,r Ir • Taxpayer Name T HALLA FAMILY LP I. I.. . sa ji i ' . Mailing Address l ea 6601 MOHAWK TRL MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55439-1029 3 a:s CO4 -_.;1"...'II ' 4' j Property Address s cAddressiL 951 78TH ST W II City I r. 7 - 4 1\' CHANHASSEN. MN 55317 A. Parcel Information Uses Commercial GIS Acres 1.38 Net Acres Deeded Acres Plat CHANHASSEN RETAILTHIRDADDN Lot 001 Block 001 Tax Description Building Information Building Style Above Grade Bedrooms Finished Sq Ft Year Built Garage Miscellaneous Information School District Watershed District Homestead Green Acres Ag Preserve 0112 WS 064 RILEY PURG BLUFF N N N Assessor Information Estimated Market Value 2019 Values 2020 Values Last Sale Payable 2020) Payable 2021) Land 964.500.00 8964.500.00 Date of Sale 4/21/2005 Building 391,400.00 8380.200.00 Sale Value 1,325,000.00 Total 1,355,900.00 1,344,700.00 The data provided herewith is for reference purposes only.This data is not suitable for legal.engineering,surveying or other similar purposes.Carver County does not guarantee the accuracy of the information contained herein.This data is furnished on an as is basis and Carver County makes no representations or warranties.either expressed or implied,for the merchantability or fitness of the information provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes§466.03 and the user of the data provided herein acknowledges that Carver County shall not be liable for any damages,and by using this data in any way expressly waives all claims,and agrees to defend.indemnify,and hold harmless Carver County.its officials.officers,agents employees,etc.from any and all claims brought by anyone who uses the information provided for herein.rts employees or agents.or third parties which arise out of user's access.By acceptance of this data,the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user includes wrth the data a copy of this disclaimer. Saturday, November 14, 2020 Carver County. MN 41 Qt • t' V a ? k Pi ham___ — .. O g x z1 3 8t r e` A m 8 ) J, ' s ar „ $ a k G, ka t 8 gr 5 k S i t Z`• °'. E 1 ';‘,'• tit P Yii4. i... . y a a• 4 g s ar. C.-. . ', Lvov " e rr. 4." Pc. Grla z a yw tr.fbil r. f2 G - V1 rn 114` F._. ' , 4 s > ry r It 1 33iii O g; w : ay g a 3 4 Z i 4 e33 3 3. 3 E ; l 3ili £ ss2. 2. iO E. titt• as ,,,.- iritiai. :ikii a \ 3 = a, il9 ZZZ; " i 2 II l_ i =- Fs a s 5 E Fg 1$ i e 1 t" i IC: 3' vtIVati `oi. li I $ 3§ it - a 3Y z 4 g t 1 3g 33, ; gilt l' '`: cis 1 • 0 3 30. Y VI i, , 4.. F 4il 111 E 1i s3e$ 8 i 81z e 5 i ' t$ j3 1 i keg fill/washricesinkbargrain roomutilitymechcoolerofficewomenmen12 tapsmerch.portablestage, nickeg storageelecboilerchemstoragelounge16' cast iron/sst trench drainjanmashco2lab table;salvaged ssttablegame/wishing wellgamenew gas fire placecoolerelec panelsexgtrans.exg metersremove landscapingand concrete walks andreplace with newconcrete patio- infillcurb where ada rampremoved8' removable fencesection310.4 SFmodify existingfreezer/cooler; removeexisting divising walland modify freezer tocooler.new sloped slab totrench drain 12' x 24'palletnew 3/0doornew keg cooler fortaps 10'x12'10' x 7'ht glasspanel overheaddoorpospospostaproom2048.4 SFnew floor finish to bepolished concrete.alternate to be lvtvestibule82.5 SFprivate room388 SFnew floor finish to bepolished concrete.alternate to be lvtbathrooms332 SFExisting tile to remainRelocate urinal screento provide 48" widthRemove and replacesinks and faucets.brew house1699 SFnew floor finish to beepoxy floor atproduction, sealedconcrete at nonproductionepoxy floorp.concepoxypatio227 SFreuse removed doors to lounge asbarn style doors at private roomentry- adjust exg opening slightlyand rework wood trim accordinglygristabovedisplaydoor3 compartment sinkpallet storagepallet storagemerch.displaystacked barrelsgatenew wood fencenew wood fence30x4830x6030x48cut existing curb and provide new ada rampepoxyexg tile new 3/0doornew 3/0doorsst topconc topconc top conc topN O R T H11/6/2020 - PERMIT SET CHANHASSENBREWING951 West 78th StreetChanhassen, MN 55317The Commons540 Lake StreetExcelsior, MN 55331PH: (612) 701-7117MAGNEYARCHITECTURE+ darin duchd e s i g nPROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - OLD PERKINS1/4" = 1'-0"1SD2 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE ST ATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on December 3, 2020, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing Request for an On-Sale Brewer Tap Room and Small Brewer Off-sale Liquor License for Chanhassen Brewing Company, LLL DBA Chanhassen Brewing Company, to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy of said notice on a postcard addressed to such owner, and depositing the postcards addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of December, 2020. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST FOR ON-SALE BREWER TAP ROOM AND SMALL BREWER OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSES CHANHASSEN BREWING COMPANY, LLC DBA CHANHASSEN BREWING COMP ANY 951 WEST 78 T H STREET NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, December 14, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 7700 Market Boulevard, to consider issuing an on-sale brewer tap room and small brewer off-sale liquor licenses to Chanhassen Brewing Company, LLC DBA Chanhassen Brewing Company located at 951 West 78 th Street. All interested persons may appear and express their opinions regarding this application at said time and place. Chanhassen City Code requires that all property owners within 500 feet of the site be notified in writing. If you have any questions, contact Kim Meuwissen at 952-227-1107. Heather Johnston Interim City Manager (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on December 3, 2020) SCANNED HALLA FAMILY LP 6601 MOHAWK TRL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439-1029 TARGET CORPORATION T-0862 PO BOX9456 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-9456 RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER 500 MAPLE ST S WACONIA, MN 55387-1791 SGO MN WEST VILLAGE LLC PO BOX 5049 SAN MATEO, CA 94402- CHANHASSEN CITY PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 CNL FUNDING 2000-A PO BOX 460369 HOUSTON, TX 77056-8369 5358 JACKSON DRIVE LLC 5425 BOONE AVE N NEW HOPE, MN 55428-3614 ISTAR MINNESOTA LLC 180 GLASTONBURY BLVD STE 201 GLASTONBURY, CT 06033-4439 WILLOW-MN LLC 4201 E YALE AVE STE 200 DENVER, CO 80222-6595 ECKANKAR PO BOX2000 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-2000 EXHIBIT A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Annual Public Hearing for Chanhassen MS4 and SWPPP Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.2. Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator File No: n/a SUMMARY This public hearing is intended to solicit public input on the City of Chanhassen's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). No formal action is required by the Council as a result of this Public Hearing. Any comments received will be reviewed by Staff for inclusion in our SWPPP and MS4 permitting. BACKGROUND MS4 stands for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. An MS4 is a conveyance, or system of conveyances, (roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, storm drains, etc.) that is also: Owned or operated by a public entity Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater Not a combined sewer Not part of a publicly owned treatment works The MS4 general permit is designed to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants entering state waters from stormwater systems, and as an MS4 permittee, the City of Chanhassen must satisfy the requirements of the MS4 general permit. The MPCA has released an updated MS4 permit that takes effect in 2021. Our annual permit submittal is done in June. One element of the MS4 general permit includes developing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A SWPPP is a plan that describes the strategies and steps that will be taken to prevent nonpoint source pollution discharging from a construction site. The SWPPP is a valuable tool and will become the backbone of the entire construction process related to erosion and sediment control and stormwater management, both during construction and post construction. The SWPPP includes a description of all construction activity, temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control BMPs, permanent stormwater management, and other pollution prevention techniques to be implemented throughout the life of the construction project. The SWPPP includes a combination of narrative plans and standard detail sheets that address the foreseeable conditions at any stage of construction. DISCUSSION CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectAnnual Public Hearing for Chanhassen MS4 and SWPPPSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.2.Prepared By Matt Unmacht, Water ResourcesCoordinator File No: n/aSUMMARYThis public hearing is intended to solicit public input on the City of Chanhassen's Storm Water Pollution PreventionProgram (SWPPP) and Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4).No formal action is required by the Council as a result of this Public Hearing. Any comments received will bereviewed by Staff for inclusion in our SWPPP and MS4 permitting.BACKGROUNDMS4 stands for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. An MS4 is a conveyance, or system of conveyances, (roadswith drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, storm drains, etc.)that is also:Owned or operated by a public entityDesigned or used for collecting or conveying stormwaterNot a combined sewerNot part of a publicly owned treatment worksThe MS4 general permit is designed to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants entering state waters fromstormwater systems, and as an MS4 permittee, the City of Chanhassen must satisfy the requirements of the MS4general permit. The MPCA has released an updated MS4 permit that takes effect in 2021. Our annual permitsubmittal is done in June.One element of the MS4 general permit includes developing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). ASWPPP is a plan that describes the strategies and steps that will be taken to prevent nonpoint source pollutiondischarging from a construction site. The SWPPP is a valuable tool and will become the backbone of the entireconstruction process related to erosion and sediment control and stormwater management, both during constructionand post construction. The SWPPP includes a description of all construction activity, temporary and permanenterosion and sediment control BMPs, permanent stormwater management, and other pollution prevention techniques tobe implemented throughout the life of the construction project. The SWPPP includes a combination of narrative plansand standard detail sheets that address the foreseeable conditions at any stage of construction. DISCUSSION The MS4 general permit has many elements to avoid unnecessary pollution and discharge to state waters. The bulk of these elements are called Minimum Control Measures (MCMs). There are six MCMs. MCM 1 Public Education and Outreach involves educating and informing the residents of Chanhassen on stormwater pollution prevention. This includes developing and distributing educational materials, holding educational seminars, etc. MCM 2 Public Participation and Involvement includes engaging the public to become invested in water quality. One way the City of Chanhassen accomplishes this goal is by being enrolled in the AdoptaDrain program, in which Chanhassen residents can adopt a storm drain which they are responsible for cleaning and reporting on multiple times per year. In addition, this MCM is what requires the City to solicit and address public feedback on the SWPPP. That is the reason for this public hearing. MCM 3 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination involves detecting and eliminating nonstormwater discharges to the MS4. This includes having procedures for investigating, locating, and responding to spills, along with training staff on illicit discharge recognition, along many other things. MCM 4 Construction Site Stormwater Control involves controlling sediment and pollutant from entering the MS4 from active construction sites. This is accomplished through enforcing rules as strict as the MPCA's Construction Stormwater Permit, and having procedures in place for site plan reviews, construction site inspections, etc. MCM 5 Post Construction Stormwater Management involves permanently managing stormwater onsite. The City is required to adopt rules for how and when stormwater is managed onsite. This typically includes the development of an Operations and Maintenance agreement for stormwater BMPs. MCM 6 Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping involves preventing pollution from municipal operation. The City is required to inventory and address municipally owned sources of pollution, such as material stored at the Public Works facility, the City's road salting program, etc. In addition, this MCM outlines requirements to inspect and maintain municipally owned outfalls, ponds, and BMPs, and to train employees on proper stormwater pollution detection. ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation Public Hearing: City of Chanhassen’s MS4 Permit and SWPPP Matt Unmacht, Water Resources Coordinator What is an MS4? •MS4 stands for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. •An MS4 is a conveyance or system of conveyances (roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, storm drains, etc.) that is also: •Owned or operated by a public entity (such as Chanhassen) •Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater •Not a combined sewer •Not part of a publicly owned treatment works •The MS4 general permit is designed to reduce the amount of sediment and other pollutants entering state waters from stormwater systems. The bulk of this is accomplished through six Minimum Control Measures (MCMs) •As an MS4 permitee, Chanhassen is allowed to discharge clean stormwater in to state waters. •The City of Chanhassen must satisfy the requirements of the MS4 general permit. What is the SWPPP? •One requirement of the MS4 general permit includes developing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). •A SWPPP is a plan that describes the strategies and steps that will be taken to prevent nonpoint source pollution discharging from a construction site. •The SWPPP is a valuable tool and will become the backbone of the entire construction process related to erosion and sediment control and stormwater management, both during construction and post construction MCM 1 –Public Education and Outreach MCM 2 –Public Participation and Involvement Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program –SWPPP MCM 3 –Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination MCM 4 –Construction Site Stormwater Control MCM 5 –Post Construction Stormwater Management MCM 6 –Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Questions/Comments? Public Input CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Ordinance XXX: Approve a Code Amendment Regulating the Outdoor Storage of Boats, Trailers, and Recreational Vehicles on Residential Properties Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: H.1. Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, Associate Planner File No: PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council adopts the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code concerning outdoor storage." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY In response to residents expressing frustration with the outdoor storage ordinance's prohibition on driveway storage, staff was asked to investigate amending the ordinance. As part of this investigation, the ordinances of 19 other cities were reviewed and staff found that the majority allow for some driveway storage. A table containing a summary of these cities' outdoor storage ordinances is attached. The city also took out an ad in the Chanhassen Villager and utilized social media to inform residents of the proposed changes and to solicit feedback. As of December 1, 2020, 18 residents have contacted the city with comments or concerns. Broadly speaking, 7 of the 18 expressed opposition to the proposed changes and 10 of the 18 expressed support for the proposed changes. A table summarizing the received comments is attached. Three residents participated in the November 17th public hearing on the proposed amendment and a summary of their comments and the Planning Commission's discussion is provided in the following section. Currently, the City Code allows for the outdoor storage of trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in the rear or side yard behind the front of the principle structure. A graphic showing the currently permitted storage locations is attached. One of the most common Code violation complaints that the city receives is that a neighbor is storing one of these items in their driveway in violation of this provision. Residents who receive a violation notice for this offense often express frustration that they cannot use their property as they wish and observe that many properties throughout the city do not follow this rule. Residents who lodge complaints about these items being stored in the driveway are often frustrated when the items are moved for a week or two and then reappear, or when it takes weeks for the offending item to be relocated. Due to limited staff capacity, the inherently portable nature of the items, and the fact that many properties struggle to accommodate the side or rear yard storage of these vehicles, there is widespread non compliance with this ordinance and it is extremely challenging to effectively enforce. As previously mentioned, staff conducted a review of how 19 other cities in the area regulate the outdoor storage of trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles, and found that the majority allow for some driveway storage. Staff believes CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectOrdinance XXX: Approve a Code Amendment Regulating the Outdoor Storage of Boats,Trailers, and Recreational Vehicles on Residential PropertiesSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.1.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION"The Chanhassen City Council adopts the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Codeconcerning outdoor storage."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYIn response to residents expressing frustration with the outdoor storage ordinance's prohibition on driveway storage,staff was asked to investigate amending the ordinance. As part of this investigation, the ordinances of 19 other citieswere reviewed and staff found that the majority allow for some driveway storage. A table containing a summary ofthese cities' outdoor storage ordinances is attached. The city also took out an ad in the Chanhassen Villager andutilized social media to inform residents of the proposed changes and to solicit feedback. As of December 1, 2020, 18residents have contacted the city with comments or concerns. Broadly speaking, 7 of the 18 expressed opposition tothe proposed changes and 10 of the 18 expressed support for the proposed changes. A table summarizing thereceived comments is attached. Three residents participated in the November 17th public hearing on the proposedamendment and a summary of their comments and the Planning Commission's discussion is provided in the followingsection. Currently, the City Code allows for the outdoor storage of trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in the rear or sideyard behind the front of the principle structure. A graphic showing the currently permitted storage locations is attached.One of the most common Code violation complaints that the city receives is that a neighbor is storing one of theseitems in their driveway in violation of this provision. Residents who receive a violation notice for this offense oftenexpress frustration that they cannot use their property as they wish and observe that many properties throughout thecity do not follow this rule. Residents who lodge complaints about these items being stored in the driveway are oftenfrustrated when the items are moved for a week or two and then reappear, or when it takes weeks for the offendingitem to be relocated. Due to limited staff capacity, the inherently portable nature of the items, and the fact that manyproperties struggle to accommodate the side or rear yard storage of these vehicles, there is widespread noncompliance with this ordinance and it is extremely challenging to effectively enforce. As previously mentioned, staff conducted a review of how 19 other cities in the area regulate the outdoor storage of trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles, and found that the majority allow for some driveway storage. Staff believes that allowing residents to store a trailer, boat, or recreational vehicle in their driveway would resolve many of the enforcement issues with the current ordinance without meaningfully degrading the character of the city’s neighborhoods. A graphic showing the proposed storage locations is attached. Staff is also proposing adding requirements to limit the total number of these vehicles stored on a property to two, preventing these vehicles from obstructing sidewalks or sight lines, and preventing them from being used to store items not permitted by the city’s outdoor storage ordinance. Staff feels that the proposed amendment strikes an appropriate balance between allowing residents reasonable use of their property and preserving the appearance and character of the city’s neighborhoods. BACKGROUND On November 17, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting and conducted a public hearing on a proposed amendment to the city’s outdoor storage ordinance. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the proposed amendment. During the public hearing, three members of the public addressed the Planning Commissioners. A summary of their statements is provided below: Joe and Connie Perttu:Expressed frustration that after 15 years of storing a boat in their driveway during the summer, they were informed they were in violation of ordinance and had to move it due to the city receiving a complaint. They noted that they took pride in the appearance of the property and the boat. They stated that there was also a financial aspect to the ordinance, since if they could not store the boat on their driveway they would need to pay to have it stored elsewhere. They pointed out that not being able to store the boat onsite reduced the usability of the boat as they had to drive to pick it up before taking it out. Mary Olson:Noted that as time has passed, more people have started violating HOA covenants and that it can have a negative impact on the appearance of neighborhoods. She expressed concern that changing the ordinance could lead to increased clutter and additional vehicles being parked in the street instead of driveways. She also observed that that there are ongoing issues with people leaving trash cans out rather than bringing them up and storing them properly. She expressed concern that people would not act responsibly within the bounds of the proposed ordinance. During the meeting, the Planning Commissioners expressed the following: 1. Commissioner Weick asked if the ordinance would change the amount of time items could be stored on a parcel. Staff clarified that no duration limit currently existed nor was one being proposed. 2. Commissioner Reeder asked if items had to be stored on an improved surface. Staff responded that aside from items being stored on a driveway, no improved surface was required. 3. Commissioner Noyes asked if there were any required side yard setbacks. Staff explained that no side yard setback was currently required nor was one being proposed. 4. Commissioner Weick asked if there was a front yard setback. Staff noted that a sight line setback was required and items had to be located behind the front lot line (i.e. not in the rightofway). 5. Commissioner Reeder asked if an item could be stored in the front yard alongside the driveway. Staff responded that the only permitted front yard storage would be on the driveway. Commissioner Reeder asked staff to explain why items were not permitted alongside the driveway. Staff clarified that it was an aesthetics issue. Commissioner Reeder expressed concern that this would prevent many people from actually storing items in their driveway as the storage would block vehicle access to the garage. 6. Commissioner Von Oven asked how personal watercraft were regulated. Staff clarified that they would be considered a boat, and that a boat on a trailer would count as one item. 7. Commissioner Randall asked who determined if a vehicle is operable or not. Staff explained that they would look at how frequently it was being used/moved. 8. Commissioner Skistad noted that any change to the ordinance would not supersede neighborhood covenants. 9. Commissioner Weick stated that the question was if the proposed change would improve the overall physical appearance of the city. He stated that in some cases, a driveway may be better than the side yard and vice versa. 10. Commissioner Von Oven asked for an estimate of how many complaints staff receives about items stored in driveways. Staff estimated around a complaint every week or two. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectOrdinance XXX: Approve a Code Amendment Regulating the Outdoor Storage of Boats,Trailers, and Recreational Vehicles on Residential PropertiesSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.1.Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION"The Chanhassen City Council adopts the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Codeconcerning outdoor storage."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYIn response to residents expressing frustration with the outdoor storage ordinance's prohibition on driveway storage,staff was asked to investigate amending the ordinance. As part of this investigation, the ordinances of 19 other citieswere reviewed and staff found that the majority allow for some driveway storage. A table containing a summary ofthese cities' outdoor storage ordinances is attached. The city also took out an ad in the Chanhassen Villager andutilized social media to inform residents of the proposed changes and to solicit feedback. As of December 1, 2020, 18residents have contacted the city with comments or concerns. Broadly speaking, 7 of the 18 expressed opposition tothe proposed changes and 10 of the 18 expressed support for the proposed changes. A table summarizing thereceived comments is attached. Three residents participated in the November 17th public hearing on the proposedamendment and a summary of their comments and the Planning Commission's discussion is provided in the followingsection. Currently, the City Code allows for the outdoor storage of trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in the rear or sideyard behind the front of the principle structure. A graphic showing the currently permitted storage locations is attached.One of the most common Code violation complaints that the city receives is that a neighbor is storing one of theseitems in their driveway in violation of this provision. Residents who receive a violation notice for this offense oftenexpress frustration that they cannot use their property as they wish and observe that many properties throughout thecity do not follow this rule. Residents who lodge complaints about these items being stored in the driveway are oftenfrustrated when the items are moved for a week or two and then reappear, or when it takes weeks for the offendingitem to be relocated. Due to limited staff capacity, the inherently portable nature of the items, and the fact that manyproperties struggle to accommodate the side or rear yard storage of these vehicles, there is widespread noncompliance with this ordinance and it is extremely challenging to effectively enforce. As previously mentioned, staff conducted a review of how 19 other cities in the area regulate the outdoor storage oftrailers, boats, and recreational vehicles, and found that the majority allow for some driveway storage. Staff believesthat allowing residents to store a trailer, boat, or recreational vehicle in their driveway would resolve many of theenforcement issues with the current ordinance without meaningfully degrading the character of the city’sneighborhoods. A graphic showing the proposed storage locations is attached. Staff is also proposing addingrequirements to limit the total number of these vehicles stored on a property to two, preventing these vehicles fromobstructing sidewalks or sight lines, and preventing them from being used to store items not permitted by the city’soutdoor storage ordinance. Staff feels that the proposed amendment strikes an appropriate balance between allowingresidents reasonable use of their property and preserving the appearance and character of the city’s neighborhoods.BACKGROUNDOn November 17, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting and conducteda public hearing on a proposed amendment to the city’s outdoor storage ordinance. The Planning Commission heardtestimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the proposedamendment.During the public hearing, three members of the public addressed the Planning Commissioners. A summary of theirstatements is provided below:Joe and Connie Perttu:Expressed frustration that after 15 years of storing a boat in their driveway during thesummer, they were informed they were in violation of ordinance and had to move it due to the city receiving acomplaint. They noted that they took pride in the appearance of the property and the boat. They stated that there wasalso a financial aspect to the ordinance, since if they could not store the boat on their driveway they would need to payto have it stored elsewhere. They pointed out that not being able to store the boat onsite reduced the usability of theboat as they had to drive to pick it up before taking it out.Mary Olson:Noted that as time has passed, more people have started violating HOA covenants and that it can havea negative impact on the appearance of neighborhoods. She expressed concern that changing the ordinance could leadto increased clutter and additional vehicles being parked in the street instead of driveways. She also observed that thatthere are ongoing issues with people leaving trash cans out rather than bringing them up and storing them properly. Sheexpressed concern that people would not act responsibly within the bounds of the proposed ordinance.During the meeting, the Planning Commissioners expressed the following:1. Commissioner Weick asked if the ordinance would change the amount of time items could be stored on aparcel. Staff clarified that no duration limit currently existed nor was one being proposed.2. Commissioner Reeder asked if items had to be stored on an improved surface. Staff responded that aside fromitems being stored on a driveway, no improved surface was required.3. Commissioner Noyes asked if there were any required side yard setbacks. Staff explained that no side yardsetback was currently required nor was one being proposed.4. Commissioner Weick asked if there was a front yard setback. Staff noted that a sight line setback was requiredand items had to be located behind the front lot line (i.e. not in the rightofway).5. Commissioner Reeder asked if an item could be stored in the front yard alongside the driveway. Staff respondedthat the only permitted front yard storage would be on the driveway. Commissioner Reeder asked staff to explainwhy items were not permitted alongside the driveway. Staff clarified that it was an aesthetics issue. CommissionerReeder expressed concern that this would prevent many people from actually storing items in their drivewayas the storage would block vehicle access to the garage.6. Commissioner Von Oven asked how personal watercraft were regulated. Staff clarified that they would beconsidered a boat, and that a boat on a trailer would count as one item.7. Commissioner Randall asked who determined if a vehicle is operable or not. Staff explained that they wouldlook at how frequently it was being used/moved.8. Commissioner Skistad noted that any change to the ordinance would not supersede neighborhood covenants.9. Commissioner Weick stated that the question was if the proposed change would improve the overall physicalappearance of the city. He stated that in some cases, a driveway may be better than the side yard and vice versa. 10. Commissioner Von Oven asked for an estimate of how many complaints staff receives about items stored in driveways. Staff estimated around a complaint every week or two. 11 . Commissioner Reeder suggested amending the proposal to allow for items to be stored in the front yard alongside the driveway, due to the inability of some properties to accommodate side yard storage. 12. Commissioner Von Oven indicated that he felt the proposed amendment struck a good balance and that front yard storage should not be expanded beyond the driveway. Commissioners Skistad, Noyes, and Randall seconded his comments. 13. Commissioner Von Oven indicated that he hoped additional public input would be received in advance of the City Council hearing the proposed amendment. 14. Commissioner Reeder stated that he felt the proposed amendment was an improvement, but that he would like to see outdoor storage expanded to include the side yard near the driveway in a future amendment. Verbatim minutes from the November 17, 2020 meeting are included in this City Council packet and provide a complete record of the presentations, public hearing, and resulting discussions. A table summarizing the emails and phone calls staff received prior to the Planning Commission meeting is also attached. DISCUSSION A full discussion is provided in the attached issue paper. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the outdoor storage ordinance be amended to allow for one boat, trailer, or recreational vehicle to be stored in the driveway, subject to setbacks, and limit the total number of boats, trailers, and/or recreational vehicles stored on a property to two. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Ordinance Amendment Research Table Resident Comments Table Emailed Comments Currently Allowed Storage Areas Proposed Storage Areas Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated November 17, 2020 CITY OT CHAI'IIIASSTI'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM FROM: SUBJ: Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 17 ,2020 Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers, and RV's Residents have expressed frustration with the ordinance's prohibition on driveway storage and the fact that many homeowners do not abide by the ordinance, which creates the impression of unfair or ineffective enforcement practices. The City Code allows for the outdoor storage oftrailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in the rear or side yard behind the front of the principle structure. One of the most common code violation complaints that the City receives is that a neighbor is storing one ofthese items in their driveway in violation ofthis provision. Residents who receive a violation notice for this offense often express frustration that they cannot use their property as they wish and observe that many properties throughout the City do not follow this rule. Residents who lodge complaints about these items being stored in the driveway are often frustrated when the items are moved for a week or two and then reappear or when it takes weeks for the offending ilem to be relocated. Due to limited staff capacity, the inherently portable nature of the items, and the fact that many properties struggle to accommodate the side or rear yard storage ofthese vehicles, there is widespread non-compliance with this ordinance and it is extremely challenging to effectively enforce. Staff conducted a review ofhow l9 other cities in the area regulate the outdoor storage oftrailers, boats. and recreational vehicles, and found that the majority allow for some driveway storage. Staff believes that allowing residents to store a trailer, boat, or recreational vehicle in their driveway would resolve many of the enforcement issues with the current ordinance without meaningfully degrading the character of the City's neighborhoods. Staff is also proposing adding requirements to limit the total number ofthese vehicles stored on a property to two, preventing these vehicles from obstructing sidewalks or sight lines, and preventing them from being used to store items not permitted by the City's outdoor storage ordinance. Staff feels that the proposed amendment strikes an appropriate balance between allowing residents reasonable use oftheir property and preserving the appearance and character ofthe City's neighborhoods. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO I4ARKET BOULEVAED .PO BOX ]4T.CHANHASSEN 'MINNESOTA 55517 DATE: TO: ISSUE SUMMARY Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page 2 RELEV ANT CITY COD E Sec. 20-909. - Outdoor storage: Allows continued storage ofboats, all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles and trailers in side or rear yard. This storage may not extend past the front ofthe principle structure, and the fiont ofthe structue is defined as the side accessed by the driveway. Section 20-910. - Storage ofrecreational vehicles: Allows recreational vehicles to be stored in the side or rear yard behindthe required front yard setback. It contains provisions regulating condition, maintenance. and on-site use of recreational vehicles. ORDIN ANCE HISTORY Ordinance 47, adopted in February of 1972, allowed for the outdoor storage of trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in rear yards. ordinance 47A, adopted in February of 1974, allowed outdoor storage oftrailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in one side yard if rear yard was inaccessible. Ordinance 80, adopted in December of 1986, allowed outdoor storage of trailers, boats, and recreational vehiclis in rear or side yards. This ordinance has not been substantively modified since its adoption; the handful of amendments passed all served to clarify rather than significantly alter the original ordinance. AN YSIS Existing Ordinance: It has bien staff s experience that many residents object to living next to houses with multiple trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in varying states ofrepair and disrepair spread across the property. These objections become even more stringent when these types ofvehicles are located in ifr" -front yard and are readily visible from the street. There is general agreement that the lowered curb appeal associated with vehicles being stored in the front lawn lowers property values and constiiules a nuisance; however, there is not a clear consensus ifvehicles stored in the driveway are undesirable in the same way as vehicles stored on the front lawn. There is also a strong deference to property owners' rights to use their property as they see fit, so long as that use does unduly impact adjacent residents. In order to batance the right ofproperty owners to store their possessions on their property with the impact ofthat storage on the surrounding neighborhood, the City has prohibited outdoor storage of trailers, boats, and ricreational vehicles within front yards and driveways since 1972 while allowing storage within the rear yard. In 1986, the City loosened this ordinance to allow the storage oftrailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in both the side and rear yards. Currently the City's outdoor storage ordinance allows for the storage oftrailers, boats, and recreational vehicles in the rear and side yard. This storage may be on improved or unimproved surfaces but may not extend beyond the front ofthe principle structure. There is no stated limit on the number oftrailers and boats that can be stored on a property, but properties are limited to one recreational vehicle and an excessive number oftrailers or boats could violate the nuisance ordinance. The ordinance also has various provisions regulating the condition and use ofthese items. For example, the ordinance limits the amount of time that someone can live in a recreational vehicle stored on their property. The existing ordinance has the advantage ofclearly stating where vehicles can be stored, i.e. ifa boat, trailer, or recreational vehicle is anywhere in the front yard it is in violation ofthe ordinance, and since it has been in existence for 34 years many residents are aware of it. That being said, some residents have expressed frustration with the fact that other residents do not follow the ordinance and regularly store these items in their driveway. The city does not have enough dedicated code enforcement staff to proactively patrol for violations ofthis ordinance and instead responds to complaints. This leads to a situation where some neighborhoods do not mind and never report violations, but other areas quickly report any observed violations. The result can be residents not realizing that these items should not be stored in the driveway, since they see many violations as they drive around the City and then feeling surprised and fiustrated when they are informed that they cannot store their boat, trailer, or recreational vehicle in the manner that they see others throughout the City storing them. While most residents are extremely responsive and conect violalions once they are informed ol them, there is a subset of residents who will move the item for a few days or weeks, just long enough to pass the follow up inspection, and then resume storing the boat, trailer, or recreation vehicle in its previous location. Since the City Code is designed to encourage compliance but not to be punitive, it is difficult and time consuming for the City to use the court system to issue citations or compel residents to take action to address a violation. In extreme cases where a resident chooses not to cooperate with the City, this means enlorcement actions can drag on for months. Understandably, this creates a large amount of frustration for the individual who reported the violation as they continually call in the same violation and there is an appealance of inaction on the City's part. Some ofthe language within the existing ordinance can also complicate enforcement issues. For example, the section on trailers and boats talks about "continued storage" but this term is not defined. Some residents have argued that if the boat is used most weekends it is not continued storage and should be allowed, whereas others have argued that a boat kept in a neighbor's driveway ovemight before a fishing trip once a year is a violation. Both of the above positions clearly violate the spirit olthe ordinance, but it becomes much more dillcult to determine what should be done in cases where a boat or trailer is present for a couple weekends each month or for a week during the start and end of the boating season each year. In the absence ofclear guidance, the resident making the complaint or the resident who is notified ofa violation will tend to feel the City is treating them unfairly, taking the other party's side, or misinterpreting the City Code. Additionally, while the current ordinance does limit the number of recreational vehicles to one, it does not limit the number ofboats and/or trailers that can be stored on a property. This has led to situations where a neighbor feels that multiple boats and trailers being stored on a property are unsightly, but these items are all being stored in a manner consistent with the outdoor storage ordinance. In extreme cases, the City can use the nuisance ordinance to address the complaint, but Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page 3 Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17,2020 Page 4 typically, a case cannot be made that boats and trailers in good repair stored in the rear yard out of view ofthe public constitute a public rather than private nuisance. The public versus private nuisance distinction is always the threshold for City action. A final concem is the fact that the existing ordinance was created before the City's Residential Low and Medium Density (RLM) and most of the City's Residential Planned Unit Development (PUDR) districrs. The RLM district and some small lot/cluster PUDRs allow for 5-foot side yard setbacks on the garage side. While the outdoor storage ordinance allows for boats. trailers, and recreational vehicles to be stored in the side yard, most ofthese items are too wide to fit alongside the garage in these districts without crossing the property lines. Similarly, the S-foot garage side yard may not allow a resident to transport these items to the rear yard for storage purposes without trespassing on their neighbor's property. This creates a situation where homeowners in these districts are effectually unable to utilize their property for the outdoor storage ofboats, trailers, or recreational vehicles. The above issues with enforcement and clarity as well as those caused by changes to the City Code since the ordinance was initially adopted, are the reasons why staffbelieves that the existing ordinance should be reevaluated and amended. Possible Impacls of Amending: As was observed in the previous section, the existing ordinance has been in place for 34 years and due to this, many residents have longstanding expectations that boats. trailers, and recreational vehicles will not be stored in driveways. Some residents may see amending the ordinance to allow for this type of storage as a loosening of standards that will lower the aesthetic character oftheir neighborhood and negatively affect their property values. Many ofthese residenls may also have arranged to store their own boats, trailers, and recreation vehicles offsite and they may feel it is unfair to alter the City Ordinance to accommodate neighbors who are unwilling to adhere to existing communily standards. Altematively, they may simply be relieved that they no longer have to pay to have these items stored in other locations and may not be bothered by the presence ofa boat, trailer, or recreational vehicle in a driveway. ln a similar vein, multiple homeowners associations (HOAs) in the City have covenants or policies prohibiting the outdoor storage ofboats, trailers, or recreational vehicles or preventing these items from being stored in the driveway. While there is nothing requiring the City Code to align with HOA rules and HOAs can adopt provisions that are more restrictive than the City Code, staff is aware that significant differences between HOA rules and City Code can create confusion for residents and HOA representatives. Additionally, some HOAs prefer to use the City to enforce their rules when they overlap with City Ordinances, and these HOAs may be frustrated by any change in City policy that requires them to actively enforce their policies. Finally, other HOAs that feel strongly about items not being located in driveways may not have enacted bylaws addressing this issue because they knew that City Code already prohibited it. In addition to the more visible proposed changes to the City's policy on permitting the storage of these items in driveways, staff is also recommending setting a limit on the total number of boats, trailers, and/or recreational vehicles that can be stored outdoors on a property. Anecdotally, staff does not believe a significant number of properties have more than two ofthese items stored Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page 5 Uher Communities: Staffreviewed the policies of 19 municipalities, including Chanhassen, in order an attempt to identifo local trends in regulating outdoor storage. A list ofthe communities surveyed and a brief write up oftheir policies is included as an attachment to this report. There was a great deal of variation in the various ordinances, but staff was able to identif! several trends. Common areas regulated were: 1) where in the yard boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles can be kept 2) setbacks for the storage ofthese vehicles; 3) what surfaces vehicles can be kept on; and,4) number of vehicles that can be stored on a property. While most communities surveyed permitted driveway storage, many of those communities limited that storage in some way. As the table shows, approximately one in five cities, including Chanhassen, did not permit any sto identical percentage of cities allowed the uffestricted storage of boats, trailers. and recreation vehicles in the driveway. The rest allowed the use of driveways for storage, but limited that storage by season, i.e. boats were allowed in the driveway only dwing boating season, or placed limits on the size, number, or types of vehicles. Many of these Cities of boats, trailers, or recreational vehicles in driv ewa s. An also had provisions requiring that items stored in the driveway be setback a minimum distance from the road or front lot line. Seasonally NoYesYes with limits* 4 47f of City's allowing 2t.05%21.05%27.05%% of total *Typical limits: number of vehicles, type of vehicles, length of vehicles, height of vehicles, curb setbacks, or demonstrated lack of alternative location. outdoors; however, any resident that is accustomed to having more than that number of items stored on their property would be negatively impacted by the proposed limit. While these residents will likely be opposed to this limit, it is possible that their neighbors will be supportive of it and feel that it improves the neighborhood aesthetic. Staff anticipates that any enforcement ofthe proposed limit would need to be conducted with a great deal ofcompassion and flexibility, as formally compliant properties may need to find a new location for some oftheir boats, trailers, or recreational vehicles. Lastly, as was discussed in the previous section, the difficulties in enforcing this ordinance and apparent inconstancies caused by the complaint based nature ofthe City' enforcement process causes a great deal of frustration for all parties. Staff believes that expanding the permitted storage options for residents will reduce the amount of frustration generated by the outdoor storage ordinance by removing the most common and visible violation. While it is difficult to know what the majority of residents would prefer, the City has taken out an ad in the paper and used i1s online tools to solicit public input during and in advance ofthe public hearing. Hopefully, the received comments will help the Planning Commission determine which of these impacts the proposed changes will have for the majority ofresidents. Allowed on driveway 4 35.84% Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17,2020 Page 6 Most Cities, 16 out of 19, also required side yard setbacks. The most common side yard setback was S-feet, 11 out of 19 Cities, but four Cities used a sliding setback based on vehicle size or required vehicles to meet zoning distract setbacks. One City imposed a ten-foot side yard setback for all outdoor storage. Chanhassen was one of three Cities that did not impose a side yard setback. There was a more even split between Cities that required vehicles stored in the side or rear yard to be parked upon an improved surface and those that did not. Just over halt I I of 19, did not require trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles to be parked on an improved surface. Chanhassen was one ofthe Cities that allowed these types ofvehicles to be parked on grass. The other eight Cities required that all vehicles be parked on a parking pad made of concrete, bituminous, pavers, or other approved hard surface. Finally, a great deal of variation was present in if and how communities limited the number trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles that could be stored outdoors on residential properties. Just under halfofthe Cities surveyed, eight of 19, did not place a limit on the number ofvehicles. Chanhassen was one of the Cities that did not explicitly limit the number of items that could be stored. The eleven Cities that did regulate the number ofvehicles stored outdoors used many different systems. Some allowed up to four vehicles to be stored but included cars as well as boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles in that total. Others regulated by type or size allowing two or three boats trailers, and/or recreational vehicles but only one ola certain type or over a certain lengh or height. When passenger vehicles were not included in the count, a limit of two or three total boats, failers, and recreational vehicles was the most common cap for communities with a limit on the number of items stored outdoors. As the information above shows, there is a great deal of variety in how Cities regulate the outdoor storage ofboats, trailers, and recreational vehicles. Chanhassen's current ordinance is more restrictive than most in that it does not allow for any storage within driveways, but more flexible than most because it does not require outdoor storage to meet any side yard setbacks. Similarly, Chanhassen's ordinance is in the minority by not limiting the number of vehicles, but in the majority by not requiring storage on improved surfaces. However, in both ofthe last two categories there is a very even split between communities. Potential Areas for Change: Examining other Cities' ordinances can provide useful information, but each City's outdoor storage ordinance needs to reflect the expectations oftheir residents, limitations oftheir zoning districts, and available enforcement resources. Keeping in mind these elements, staff evaluated the following areas within the City's outdoor storage ordinance for potential amendment: I ) driveway storage; 2) side yards setbacks; 3) allowed surfaces;4) size of items; 5) number of items; and, 6) duration ofstorage. The first issue is likely to have the largest impact on the perceived character ofthe City's neighborhoods. Staff knows that there are strong feelings on both sides; however, staff also realizes that the driveway storage prohibition is frequently violated and cannot be effectively enforced with current resources. As was discussed earlier, these enforcement issues have created a large amount of frustration for residents, both those abiding by and those violating the ordinance. Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page 7 While allowing driveway storage would be a significant change on paper, the fact that violations of these ordinances are as common as they are means the actual change to the City's neighborhoods would be more limited. Certainly, some properties that currently store boats, trailers, or recreational vehicles off site would switch to storing them in their driveway, but given the prevalence of driveway storage in some neighborhoods the visual impact ofthis uptick is unlikely to be dramatic. Additionally, in neighborhoods where HOA covenants prevent the outdoor storage ofboats, trailers, and recreational vehicles, those rules would still be in force and there would be no change. Residents living in HOAs that do not currently ban this type of storage would also have the option ofpassing new bylaws to create or maintain desired neighborhood standards. Outside of aesthetic concems, the most significant issue with allowing driveway storage is the possibility for this storage to obstruct sightlines, sidewalks, or the public right-of-way. These concems can be addressed by requiring driveway storage to be inside of the front property line. Most ciry $reets have l0 to l5 feet ofpublic right-of-way between the curb and start of a resident's property. This gap between the rear of stored vehicles and the road will keep the site lines clear in most cases and will prevent any obstruction to vehicles traveling on the road. Sidewalks are typically located within this area as well, which means stored vehicles should not obstruct this infrastructure. A potential complication is the fact that many residents are not aware ofthe location oftheir front property lines and some education and enforcement may be required to address vehicles parked on the driveway partially within the public right-of-way. While enforcing this provision will require some education, since residents will have a simple solution ofpulling the vehicle further forward, rather than a more complicated and expensive solution like finding and paying for offsite storage, rates of compliance and cooperation will be higher. Given the above, allowing boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles to be stored in the driveway with provisions requiring they be stored behind the front lot line, not obstruct sidewalks, and be clear of the sight distance triangle would provide residents additional flexibly and remove a persistent enforcement issue. The second issue is the fact that the City does not currently require outdoor storage to meet any side yard setbacks. The rational for that policy is that these items are mobile and do not meet the definition ofa structure. Additionally, if the City were to require outdoor storage to adhere to a 5-foot side yard setback it would create a Code provision that many, ifnot most, residents could not take advantage of. Most ofthe City's detached single-family homes are located in districts with l0- foot side yard setbacks and many ofthese homes are built exactly at that l0-foot setback on the garage side. Since many boats, lrailers, or recreational vehicles are wider than five feet, these homes would not actually be able to store items in their side-yard. despite the ordinance saying they can. Finally, many residents have become accustomed to storing these items alongside their garage within five feet of their side lot line and would likely be frustrated by a change to the City's ordinance that prohibits storage in that location. To date staffhas not received a significant number of complaints from residents upset by the side yard storage ofboats, trailers, and recreational vehicles. Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page E The third issue, allowed surfaces, is closely related to the second issue of setbacks. All improved surfaces like gravel, concrete, bituminous, and pavers would be considered a structure or driveway under the City Code and would be subject to the relevant setbacks. Ifthe City were to require that boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles be stored on improved surfaces, it would essentially be creating a 5-foot minimum setback, which would involve all of the concems explored in the second item. Beyond those issues, it would also lead to a situation where properties up against their lot cover limit would be unable to store their boats, trailers, and vehicles on their property due to an inability to add a parking pad. This could create situations where residents who were previously able to store these items in their rear or side yard are no longer able to do so. Generally, the rationale for requiring improved surfaces is aesthetic, i.e. people believe it looks nicer, and to protect yards from being damaged by storage. Staff does not believe there is any compelling reason to require boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles to be stored on improved surfaces and is not recommending altering this portion ofthe ordinance. The fourth issue, size of items, is not currently regulated by the City. There is an obvious difference in the visual impact that storing a l4-foot high 45-foot long recreational vehicle has versus the visual impact that storing a l2-foot long fishing boat has. Some Cities have attempted to address this by establishing maximum height and lenglh requirements for the outdoor storage oftrailers, boats, and recreational vehicles. In reviewing the policies ofother municipalities, there did not appear to be any consensus on how big was too big and many municipalities allowed smaller vehicles to be stored in driveway while relegating larger vehicles to the side or rear yard. The main rationale behind these types ofpolicies is a desire to prevent vehicles from extending into the right-of-way, obstructing sidewalks, and blocking sight lines, as well as mitigating the visual impact on neighbors. All ofthese goals, except the last, can be better managed by requiring trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles to be located behind the front lot line and clear ofthe sight distance triangle. This tlpe of approach will also serve to indirectly limit the length of these items due to the tendency ofhomes to be built right up to their minimum fiont yard setback. In practice, this would mean that most properties would be able to accommodate the outdoor storage of something 20 to 25 feet long since the most common front yard setbacks are 25 and 30 feet. In cases where houses are set back sigrrificantly further fiom their front lot line, the visual impact ofthe increased size of items will be partially offset by increased distance from the road. Ultimately, the concem is that any size limit imposed will be arbitrary and subject to challenge by residents upset that their neighbor's 22-foot boat is okay but their 24-foot boat is not. There are also enforcement challenges created by an ordinance that requires inspectors to enter private prope(y to The existing expectations for side yard storage and the setbacks ofthe prevailing residential districts mean that implementing a side yard setback for outdoor storage would create significant enforcement issues. For these reasons staff does not recommend altering this portion of the ordinance. Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page 9 measue the length and height ofvehicles. Staff believes that the indirect limits created by requiring these vehicles to be inside ofthe front lot line are sufficient to address the major concerns associated with the size of stored items. The fifth issue, number of items, is mostly unregulated by the City's outdoor storage ordinance. The ordinance does limit properties to a maximum ofone recreational vehicle, but does not limit the number oftrailers and boats that can be stored on a property. From time to time, the City does receive complaints from residents about properties that have multiple trailers, boats, and recreational vehicles stored outside. Often residents feel that large numbers ofthese items stored on a property create an unpleasant appearance and violate neighborhood norms. Despite this, when the items are in good repair it is difficult to make the case that they violate the nuisance ordinance and ifthey are located in the rear or side yard, they meet the requirements ofthe City's outdoor storage ordinance. The presence oflarge numbers ofboats, trailers, and recreational vehicles on a single property can be visually unappealing and be out ofkeeping with the character ofthe City's single-family neighborhoods. Currently, staff is aware ofa relatively small number of properties thal have more than two ofthese items stored outside; however, an unintended consequence of allowing residents to use their driveways to store these items may be an increase in the number oftrailers, boats, and recreational vehicles stored on a single residential property. The presence of multiple boats, trailers, and recreational vehicles in a single driveway could significantly affect the curb appeal ofa property. These concems can be mitigated by limiting residential properties to storing a maximum of two trailers, boats, and/or recreation vehicles and allowing the storage ofno more than one ofthese in the driveway. The final item, duration of storage, is a source of ambiguity within the existing City Code. The outdoor storage ordinance prohibits continuous storage outside the rear or side yard, but does not provide any guidance on what constituted continuous storage. The ordinance does specify that recreational vehicles can be stored in the driveway for up to 24 hours for loading or unloading, but no such guidance is provided for boats and trailers. Many times the City receives a spike in outdoor storage complaints at the start and end ofboating season as boats spend a week or two stored in driveways as residents arrange to transfer them between their seasonal storage locations. Additionally, as was noted earlier in this report, staff often encounters problems enforcing the ordinance in situations where these items are kept in the driveway for a couple days each month. Allowing the storage ofone boat, trailer, or recreational vehicle within the driveway will help resolve lhese issues. If driveway storage is permitted, the temporary location ofboat, trailer, or a recreational vehicle will not create a location violation. While there may still be issues with a second item being placed in the driveway during transition times, there will be an easily executable solution of moving the item not currently being used to the rear or side yard to resolve the violation. Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17,2020 Page l0 Adopting language limiting the number ofdays or hours an item can be stored in a certain location is problematic in that enforcement is very difficult since staffdoes not have a practical mechanism for tracking this. Proposed Chonges Staff is proposing the following changes to the City's outdoor storage ordinance: Sec. 20-909(6)Continuedstorageofrecreationalvehicles,boats,@and trailers,subjecttotherequirementsofSection20-910,@ a, Sueh storage may net Staf is recommending moving all clarifying provisions to Sec. 20-910 to increose clarity, with Sec. 20-909 only stating that the storqge ofrecreational vehicles, boats, and trailers is pelmitted subiect to lhose standords. Sec.20-910..@outdoorstorageofrecreationalvehicIes,boats,and trailers. Staff is recommending making this section apply to recrealional vehicles, boats, and lrailers rather than jusl recrealionol vehicles. Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers owned by a resident owner or resident lessee of the property may be parked or stored in a residential or agricultural district provided the following conditions are met: The additions in this section are the existing language from Sec. 20-909(6) and should be retained to ensure that the vehicles slored on a property belong to the person residing there. (1) No more than ene two recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers may be parked or stored outside on a residential lot. Additional recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may be kept within an enclosed structure which otherwise conforms to the zoning requirements of the district. Establishes a limit oftwo recreationol vehicles, boats, and/or tailers. This would increase lhe allowed numbers ofrecreational vehicles from one to troo, but also establish a limit on the number of boats and tailers allowed. Ifthe ordinance is not amended to allow for the keeping ofone item in the driveway, language clarifying the term continuous storage should be adopted. If the ordinance is amended to permit driveway storage, staff does not believe any regulations on the duration of permitted storage within the driveway will be needed. Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page I I (2) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers must be maintained in a clean, well-kept, operable condition. Expands exisling provision to include boats and trailers. (3) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers shall be mobile and shall not be permanently affrxed in the ground in a manner that would prevent removal. Expands existing provision to include boats and lrailers. (4) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may be parked or stored in the following locations: a. One recreational vehicle, boat, or trailer may be parked or stored within the front yard setback in the driveway, provided that it is not located within the sight distance triangle, does not protrude into the road right-of-way, and does not obstruct the sidewalk, b. Recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers may be stored in the rear or side yard' provided that such storage does not extend beyond the front ofthe principal structure. The parking or storage of recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers in the rear or side yard may be on surfaced or unsurfaced areas. c. On corner or double frontage lots, storage or parking of recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers is not permitted within any required front yard setback' except as provided under Section 20-910(4)(a) above. Permits driveway storage of up to one recrealional vhicle, boal, or tailer. This storage would need to be clear of the right-of-way, not obstruct sidewall<s, and not block the sight distance triangle. Requires that storage on corner/double fronlage lots be clear ofrequired front yard setbackfor the side street. Sec. 20-910(1).b-c mirrors existing Sec. 20-909(6)(a-b). (4) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may not be used for outdoor storage; however, trailers designed and intended to convey other vehicles maybe used to store those vehicles (for example, snowmobiles may be stored outdoors on a snowmobile trailer). h€urs. Makes it clear lhat snowmobiles/ATvs/etc. may still be kept outside on lrailers (as currently allowed in Sec. 909(6); however, does not allow residents to pile "junk" in boat/utility trailer and claim il is allowed as part of permitted ouldoor storoge. Issue 5: Proposed Outreach and Timeline Amending the outdoor storage ordinance would have a significant impact on the City's residents and could lead to a $eat deal of confusion as residents discover that previously prohibited practices are now permitted. In order to avoid this, staff is proposing that the amendment be passed with a clause Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page 12 specifying rhat it will go into effect on April l,2021. This delayed implementation will allow time to engage in community outreach and education to help make sure residents are aware ofthe new ordinance. Specifically, articles will be published in the City's Connection newsletter and ir;,the Chanhassen Villager explaining the changes. The City's website and social media will also be used to help publicize the new ordinance. Staffis optimistic that with multiple a(icles running on multiple platforms for several months, most residents will be exposed to the revised ordinance before it goes into effect. Staff has already gone significantly beyond the minimum public notification requirements by taking out an ad informing people ofthe proposed changes in the Chanhassen Villager and by featuring the proposed amendment on the front page of the City's website. Social media platforms were also utilized. It is hoped that these steps have already reached many residents who would have missed a single legal notice in the paper, and that individuals who feel strongly about this issue have taken the opportunity to weigh in on the proposed changes. ALTERNATIV ES I ) Do nothing. The City's existing policy is reasonable and functional. 2) Amend the outdoor storage ordinance to allow up to two recreational vehicles, trailers, and boats to be stored outdoors, with no more than one permitted in the driveway. 3) Amend the outdoor storage ordinance to allow for the storage of recreational vehicles, trailers, and boats in the driveway. 4) Amend the outdoor storage ordinance to allow for the storage of recreational vehicles, trailers, and boats on improved surfaces. 5) Amend the outdoor storage ordinance to clarify the term continuous storage. RECO MMENDATION Staff recommends Ahemative two. Staffbelieves that this proposal strikes an appropriate balance between allowing residents reasonable use oftheir property and preserving the appearance and character of the City's neighborhoods. The proposed ordinance would read as follows: Sec. 20-909. - Outdoor storage. As otherwise regulated, all outdoor storage is prohibited except: (l) Clothes line poles and wires. (2) Construction and landscaping material cunently being used on the premises. (3) Swings, slides and other play equipment. Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page 13 (4) (5) Outdoor fumiture and lawn and garden equipment. Wood for buming in a fireplace, stove or fumace provided it is stored as follows: a. In a neat and secure stack, not exceeding four feet. b. The wood stack is not infested with rodents. c. The wood is not kept in a front yard. Continuedstorageofrecreationalvehicles,boats,@and trailers'subjecttotherequirementsofSection20-9l0.@ (6) b en eemer and deuble frentage lets; the frent efthe strueture shdl be defined as the (7) Outside storage oftires is prohibited. (8) PODS (personal on demand storage) and roll-off dumpsters may be located a property a minimum of six feet away from the house for fire protection and at least ten feet from any property line. Such containers may be kept on-site for a maximum of30 days per year' An ixtinsion ofthe 30 days may be granted by the city if the container is used in conjunction with a valid and ongoing building permit. Sec'20-910'.@Outdoorstorageofrecreationalvehicles,boats,and trailers Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers owned by a resident owner or resident lessee ofthe property may be parked or stored in a residential or agricultural district provided the following conditions are met: (l) No more than ene two recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers may be parked or stored outside on a residential lot. Additional recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may be kept within an enclosed structure which otherwise conforms to the zoning requirements ofthe district. (2) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers must be maintained in a clean, well-kept, operable condition. (3) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers shall be mobile and shall not be permanently affixed in the ground in a manner that would prevent removal. (4) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may be parked or stored in the following locations: a. One recreational vehicle, boat, or trailer may be parked or stored within front yard setback in the driveway, provided that it is not located within the sight distance triangle, does not protrude into the road right-of-way, and does not obstruct the sidewalk Planning Commission Outdoor Storage: Boats, Trailers and RV's November 17, 2020 Page 14 b. Recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers may be stored in the rear or side yard, provided that such storage does not extend beyond the front ofthe principal structure. The parking or storage of recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers in the rear or side yard may be on surfaced or unsurfaced areas. c. On corner or double frontage lots, storage or parking of recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers is not permitted within any required front yard setback, except as provided under Section 20-910(4)(a) above. (5) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may not be used for outdoor storage; however, trailers designed and intended to convey other vehicles maybe used to store those vehicles (for example, snowmobiles may be stored outdoors on a snorvmobile traiter). hours= (6) Unmounted slide-in pickup curmpers must be stored no higher than 20 inches above the ground and must be securely supported at least at four comers by solid support blocks or support mechanisms. (7) Recreational vehicles may not be occupied or used for living, sleeping or housekeeping purposes for more than seven consecutive days or more than 2l days within a 365-day period. (8) Except for routine maintenance or during emergency conditions when powfl supply is disrupted, the operation ofa recreational vehicle power generator plant shall not be permitted in residential districts. Routine maintenance periods shall not exceed 60 minutes per month. g:\plan\city codeUO2OUO2045 - outdoor stomge on residential propeny\boat storage issue paper.docx 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20, ZONING, OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 20-909(6) of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: (6) Continued storage of recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers, subject to the requirements of Section 20-910. Section 2. Section 20-910 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 20-910. - Outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers owned by a resident owner or resident lessee of the property may be parked or stored in a residential or agricultural district provided the following conditions are met: (1) No more than two recreational vehicles, boats, and/or trailers may be parked or stored outside on a residential lot. Additional recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may be kept within an enclosed structure which otherwise conforms to the zoning requirements of the district. (2) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers must be maintained in a clean, well-kept, operable condition. (3) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers shall be mobile and shall not be permanently affixed in the ground in a manner that would prevent removal. (4) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may be parked or stored in the following locations: a. One recreational vehicle, boat, or trailer may be parked or stored within front yard setback in the driveway, provided that it is not located within the sight distance triangle, does not protrude into the road right-of-way, and does not obstruct the sidewalk. b. Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may be stored in the rear or side yard, provided that such storage does not extend beyond the front of the principal structure. The parking or storage of recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers in the rear or side yard may be on surfaced or unsurfaced areas. c. On corner or double frontage lots, storage or parking of recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers is not permitted within any required front yard setback, except as provided under Section 20-910(4)(a) above. 2 (5) Recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers may not be used for outdoor storage; however, trailers designed and intended to convey other vehicles maybe used to store those vehicles (for example, snowmobiles may be stored outdoors on a snowmobile trailer). (6) Unmounted slide-in pickup campers must be stored no higher than 20 inches above the ground and must be securely supported at least at four corners by solid support blocks or support mechanisms. (7) Recreational vehicles may not be occupied or used for living, sleeping or housekeeping purposes for more than seven consecutive days or more than 21 days within a 365-day period. (8) Except for routine maintenance or during emergency conditions when power supply is disrupted, the operation of a recreational vehicle power generator plant shall not be permitted in residential districts. Routine maintenance periods shall not exceed 60 minutes per month. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective as of the 1st day of April, 2021. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2020 by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor (Ordinance XXX published in the Chanhassen Villager on [insert date]) g:\plan\city code\2020\2020-05 - outdoor storage on residential property\attachment 1 outdoor storage ordinance.docx City Code Section/Reference Recreational Vehicles Yes Yes with limits*Seasonally No Chanhassen Sec. 20-909 and 20-910 Side/Rear Yard behind front of principle structure for boats and trails, clear of front yard setback for RVs, max one RV, surface does not need to be improved.# of City's allowing 4 7 4 4 19 Chaska Chapt 14, Article II, Division 1, Section 26; Sec. 9.2.1.4; Sec 9.2.2; Sec. 9.2.3.1 Up to 4 vehicles (all types cars and recreational) in front yard/driveway, must be on surfaced parking area (except rural zones), only one vehicle over 30' in length is permitted per lot. Front/Side/Rear parking areas are subject to dwelling unit/accessory building setbacks, whichever is less.% of total 21.05%36.84%21.05%21.05% Cottage Grove Sec. 11-3-9; Sec. 6-2-4.C Up to 4 vehicles (all types cars and recreation) per lot, must be on surfaced parking areas (asphalt/concrete if in front, another hard surface if behind front plane of principle structure), parking areas must meet accessory structure setbacks Elk River From Website FAQ, couldn't find code reference/section Not allowed in front yard setback/driveway (unless 20' of space between RV and sidewalk and 6' of screening is present), must be on improved surface, must be at least 5' from property line Hopkins Sec. 102-164(9), Sec. 102-164(11)One non-passenger vehicle or one building for winter ice fishing less than 22 feet in length, not in front yard except 1 boat in driveway from May 1 to October 31. One non-passenger vehicle over 22 feet in length (5' off lot line and screened). Recreation vehicles allowed in driveway for 48 hours (loading/unloading). Improved surface Unimproved Inver Grove Heights From Website FAQ, Sec. 10-15A-3 Boats, Campers, RVs can be stored in side or rear yard so long as 5' from side lot line and 8' from rear lot line. Can be located in front if on driveway or parking pad. Front yard parking area must be asphalt/concrete/pavers. Max of 2 in R- 1C district.8 11 Lino Lakes Sec. 1007.044(11)(b)Recreational vehicles and Trailers must be setback 5' from side/rear lot line, in front yard must be located on driveway or parking pad, must meet sliding street setback depending on road classification (15' local to 30' major arterial), can't be used for storage 42.11%57.89% Prior Lake Sec. 1102.700(3)Recreational vehicles allowed seasonally (Nov 1 to April 1 for winter, April 1 to Nov 1 for summer) in front yard on or adjacent to driveway. Out of season must be in rear or side yard. May not be in front yard unless receives exemption. Must meet 5' side/rear setback Rosemount Sec. 8-2-5, Website Guide Recreational vehicles must be stored on improved surface. If under 23' long they may be stored in driveway but must be 15' from curb and clear of sight triangle. If over 23' long may not be stored in driveway. Summer related RVs allowed in driveway from April 1 to Nov 1 and Winter related allowed in driveway from Nov 1 to April 1. RV's can be stored in side yard behind front line of residence on improved surface, must be setback 5' from rear/side. If corner lot must be setback 30'. RVs stored in side/rear yard must be screened. Side Setbacks Savage From Website Guide, couldn't find code reference/section Up to 3 recreational vehicles in rear or side yard, must meet 5' side/rear setback or be 100% screened. During seasonal use up 2 recreational vehicles may be stored on driveway if does not obstruct sidewalk or protrude into right-of-way. May not exceed 34' in length.Yes No 5 10 Variable Shakopee From Website Guide, Sec. 151.141(G)Only 1 RV under 35' in length may be stored outdoors, must be stored on improved parking area, may be stored in driveway, Up to 2 boats/trailers up 20' long may be stored in rear or side yard (unimproved), must meet 5' side/rear setback.16 3 11 1 4 Stillwater Sec. 31-315 Storage of recreational vehicles allowed in Rural Residential District if screened by fence/landscape from road and neighbors view. Note: found newspaper article saying in 2016 they were looking at requiring vehicles parked in front/side yards to be on improved surface. Cannot determine what happened. 84.21%15.79% Minnetonka Sec. 845.020 Up to 4 vehicles stored outside. If parked in front yard must be on driveway, Eden Prairie From Website FAQ, Sec. 11.03 Sub 3.J.3 Up to 2 RVs, may not exceed 12' in height, if in front yard must be on improved surface and setback 15' from curve, 10' side/rear setback Victoria Sec. 12-61(b)(2), Sec. 20-59(e.) Recreational vehicle allowed on a seasonal basis, must meet setbacks 0 5 10 Variable* Shorewood Sec. 1201.03 Sub 3.7 One allowed in driveway 15' from street if can't be stored in buildable lot area, RVs may be stored in buildable lot area 3 11 1 4 Waconia Sec. 900.06.C.4 Not permitted in front or street side yard. Must meet 5' rear/interior side setback.15.79%57.89%5.26%21.05% St. Louis Park From Website Guide Oversized RV: 8'+ high, 22' long, max of 1 in backyard, must be screened; Midsize RV: 6-8' high, less than 22' long, max of 2 in backyard or alongside house on paved surface; Small RV: less than 6' height, less than 22' long, max of 2 in backyard or alongside house on paved surface, or in side yard on paved surface with screening. No more than a total of 2 RVs can be stored outside. Edina Sec. 26-338 Max 2 RVs (not more than one motorhome), must meet 5' side yard, 25' rear yard setback and street setbacks, must be closer to your home than neighbors, allowed 7 days in driveway if 5' from side and 15' from curb; In non-R-1, R-2, PRD-1 and PRD-2 must be on improved surface. Carver Sec. 46-169 5' setback from property lines, must be on improved surface, may not encroach on any yard setback accept front yard. No limit limit 8 11 42.11%57.89% Number of vehicles 5' (or more) side setback Required Side Setback *Typically said must meet building setbacks, accessory structure setbacks, or parking pad setbacks Outdoor Recreation Vehicles Storage (Boats, Trailers, RVs, etc.) Allowed on driveway *Typical limits were: number of vehicles, type of vehicles, length of vehicles, height of vehicles, curb setbacks, or demonstrated lack of alternative location. Note: all required improved surface if front yard Permitted Surfaces Date Name Driveway (Y/N)Vehicle limit (Y/N)Comments 11/5/2020 Kathy Kirkeby Asked what was being proposed. Sent email on 11-5 (saved in folder) expressing concern that ordinance would make it harder for people to engage in outdoor storage (email was sent before details of proposed changes were available). 11/6/2020 Jeff Grover N NA Against proposed changes. Many people have too many cars in driveway, shouldn't allow more. If folks can afford these things, they can afford to store them. 11/9/2020 Jeff and Barb Peshek N NA Against proposed changes. Not enforced and neighborhoods look awful, people have large items and will be very noticeable, people with stored relatives/friends equipment. 11/9/2020 Konrad Siefker Y NA Unfair enforcement; difficult to comply with existing; should be changed 11/9/2020 Joe McLellan Y NA Supports the change. 11/9/2020 Tyson Paul Y NA Supports the change. 11/9/2020 Steven Brown Y NA Can't use side/rear without damaging landscaping. Widened driveway for storage. 11/13/2020 Mary Jane Olson N NA Against policy changes. Already complain about driveway storage in neighborhood. Will hurt their property value, cause friction between neighbors and degrade aesthetics. 11/10/2020 Linda Nelson Y NA Support ordinance change to allow boats, trailers and recreational vehicles to be stored in driveways even in the summer! 11/11/2020 Jackie Williams N N ABSOLUTELY NOT. Thinks each Chanhassen resident should have received a mailing regarding this. Chanhassen has always had good property values because of this ordinance. Should this ordinance change, so will our property values. You could add that garbage cans should be out of sight from the street too. 11/11/2020 Boyd Peterson N N Don’t see a modification of the standards in place at this time in relation to outside storage. 11/12/2020 Peter Keller N N Enforce current ordinance. It's meant to keep our neighborhood looking nice. 11/17/2020 Alan Nikolai Y Y The less government intervention the better! 11/17/2020 Christina "Chrissy" Ahola Y NA Outdoor storage in winter, sure. Outdoor storage if used, sure. Outdoor storage "Junk", in back yard. 11/17/2020 Allyn Goshy Y NA I personally think that if a resident wants to store their boat, trailer, or RV in their driveway, that is perfectly fine. I actually prefer it over the alternative of them putting these things in the grass next to their house. I would like to see our residents move these to the side of their house IF their driveway allows for it or have these objects moved to the side of the house, as much as their driveway allows. 11/24/2020 Etinger N NA Do not think boats should be in driveways. 11/24/2020 Joe Perttu Y NA Would like at least one boat/rv/etc. in driveway 11/24/2020 Chuck Lewis Y NA No concern with proposed change, just doesn’t want them to be banned. Resident Contacts and Comments Path: G:\PLAN\City Code\2020\2020-05 - Outdoor Storage on Residential Property\Resident Contacts and Comments From:Aanenson, Kate To:Generous, Bob Subject:FW: Storage hearings Date:Monday, November 16, 2020 10:25:38 AM From: Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 7:00 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fw: Storage hearings New boat comment From: Boyd Peterson <Boyd.Peterson@metromech.us> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 9:16 PM To: Walters, MacKenzie Subject: Storage hearings I live in southern part of city. Have been for 33 years. Have many trailers I park outside and use all at different times. All clean area and no junk. Don’t see a modification of the standards in place at this time in relation to outside storage. Certain peoples action on how they keep their stuff outside in a poor matter should not directly affect the general population of folks that do . Their are plenty other means of maintaining standards. A lot of neighborhoods in area already have storage standards in place A common name would be association Sent from my iPhone 1 Steckling, Jean From:Steven Brown <stevebmhhapres@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 9, 2020 2:32 PM To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Trailer/RV storage on city lots Please add my name to the list of city residents who wish to see this ordinance changed. Many homeowners cannot use side or back yards for storage without infringing on neighbors property, or damaging the yard or landscaping. We purposely widened our driveway for this reason. We have 3 vehicles and only a two car garage. Thanks, Steven Brown 6330 Elm Tree Ave 1 Steckling, Jean From:Jeff Grover <jeffg@twmpls.com> Sent:Friday, November 6, 2020 9:59 AM To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Chapter 20 Zoning Hearing I would like to respond to the following proposal to change Chapter 20 zoning concerning the storing of boats, trailers and recreational vehicles. I am against changing this proposal as many in Chanhassen already park 2‐3 cars in their driveway because of their garages are full of things and we should not allow these types of vehicles to further add to the eyesore. If you can afford a boat or recreational vehicle you can also afford to rent storage for it when not in use. Jeff Grover 60 twin Maple Lane Chanhassen, MN 1 Steckling, Jean From:Aanenson, Kate Sent:Monday, November 16, 2020 10:26 AM To:Generous, Bob Subject:FW: Outdoor storage of Boats, Trailers, RVs and Recreational vehicles on Residential Property Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed From: Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 6:59 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fw: Outdoor storage of Boats, Trailers, RVs and Recreational vehicles on Residential Property New comment on boat ordinance. From: Jackie Williams <jackiewilliams822@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 8:50 AM To: Walters, MacKenzie Subject: Outdoor storage of Boats, Trailers, RVs and Recreational vehicles on Residential Property Dear MacKenzie, First of all, I think each Chanhassen resident should have received a mailing regarding this to be fair. I saw this Public hearing announcement in the Chanhassen paper and on Facebook. Not all people receive the paper or are on Facebook. This is a very important decision being made for our community and how Chanhassen will look in the future. If only a small percentage of residents know that this is being considered and changed, it is not a good representation of input. Secondly, This ordinance should ABSOLUTELY NOT be changed. What happened to common sense? Can you imagine our beautiful neighborhoods with boats, trailers, RVs parked in many driveways! If the residents that own these vehicles can afford them, then they should be able to afford the storage it takes to go with ownership. The concept that a boat can sit next to the house and not stick out further than the front of the house is ugly too. Thirdly, Chanhassen has always had good property values because of this ordinance. Should this ordinance change, so will our property values. Who wants to live in a neighborhood with boats, RVs, trailers sitting in driveways! NOT ME! Not even one should be allowed. It is an eyesore and junky looking. The look of beautiful neighborhoods will definitely change. Fourth, you could add that garbage cans should be out of sight from the street too. I can't believe how many people who have a beautiful home set their garbage cans in front of their house. 2 I will be at the Public Hearing Tues. to make sure this does not go through. Please WITHDRAW this idea and never let it poke it's ugly head out again. This is a horrible idea. Trash it. Sincerely, Jackie Williams 1 Steckling, Jean From:Aanenson, Kate Sent:Wednesday, December 2, 2020 8:39 PM To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Fwd: City ordinance of outdoor storage on residential property Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: December 2, 2020 at 6:29:11 PM CST To: "Walters, MacKenzie" <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: City ordinance of outdoor storage on residential property Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Jackie Williams <jackiewilliams822@gmail.com> Date: December 2, 2020 at 5:56:37 PM CST To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: City ordinance of outdoor storage on residential property Dear City Council of Chanhassen, I am writing to you regarding the Planning Commission/public hearing that was held on Nov. 17 to discuss the city ordinance for outdoor storage on residential property. I think this will be on your Dec. 14 agenda. First of all, I think all Chanhassen residents should have been notified by a mass mailing. The issue of changing the amount of things stored in your driveway is a HUGE item of discussion. I bet maybe 10% of the residents even are aware of this being considered for a change. If only a small percentage of residents know that this is being considered and changed, it is not a fair or good representation of input.This SHOULD NOT be a hurried decision. This meeting was also advertised in the Chanhassen paper, which not all residents get or read, and on Facebook, which not all people are on or “Like” the City of Chanhassen page. Therefore not very many people are aware of what is trying to be passed. I don’t think the planning commission cared about how many residents are aware of this amendment being considered. 2 Secondly, What happened to common sense? There shouldn’t be anything stored in your driveway long term!! Can you imagine our beautiful neighborhoods with boats, trailers, and RV’s parked in the driveways on a long term basis? If the residents that own these things can afford them, then they should be able to afford the storage it takes to go with ownership. The concept that a boat can sit next to the house and not stick our further that the front of the house is ugly too. (Might as well park in the front lawn!) Should be behind a fence. Thirdly, Chanhassen has always had good property values because of this ordinance. Should this ordinance change, so will our property values. Who wants to live and look at the neighborhood boats, RV’s and trailers sitting in driveways? NOT ME! NOT EVEN ONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED!! It is an eyesore and junky looking. The look of the beautiful neighborhoods will definitely change. WE WILL BE CHANHASSEN TRAILER TRASH!!!!! Fourth, you could add that resident’s garbage cans should be out of sight from the street too. I can’t believe how many people who have beautiful (expensive) homes and have their garbage cans sitting our in front of the garage doors! I am concerned that the planning commission members really didn’t read our emails that were sent ahead of time before their meeting. I am concerned that they really didn’t care about what was said in those emails that were sent ahead of time before their meeting. The planning commission just cared about the set backs, and property lines, and surfaces that these things would be sitting on. THE PLANNING COMMISSION DIDN’T EVEN TALK ABOUT THE AESETHICS OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE WAS NO TALK ABOUT HOW THE NEIGHBORHOODS WERE GOING TO LOOK!!! Please watch the video from that meeting. There was no concern about what the people of Chanhassen wanted in those sent in emails. Out of about 20 emails, only 4 wanted the change. PLEASE take your time deciding this. This could drastically change the look of Chanhassen streets and neighborhoods. Recreational vehicles SHOULD NOT be allowed to be stored at your residence unless it is in your garage. PLEASE do your homework on this issue before voting. If you act on this Dec. 14, then you are not giving all residences a chance to know about it. I call that being sneaky and trying to get away with something! I believe the council will see what an eyesore this would be for our city. Thank you for making the best decisions for Chanhassen!! If any of you could email me back or want to call that would be greatly appreciate it. Sincerely, Jackie Williams 7547 Walnut Curve 612-554-9402 From:Aanenson, Kate To:Generous, Bob Subject:FW: Public Hearing Comments Date:Tuesday, November 17, 2020 8:09:27 AM From: Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 8:03 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Public Hearing Comments FYI From: thepjkeller@aol.com <thepjkeller@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 11:43 AM To: Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Public Hearing Comments Hello MacKenzie, I saw a notice about the public hearing on trailer storage asking for comments to be sent to you. Here are my two cents. Perspective is important and I'd like it known I am a boat trailer owner and have had up to four vehicles and four drivers living here. It is not that inconvenient to make it work so you are legally parking everything. The current ordinance is meant to keep our neighborhoods looking nice and I think that is a good idea and should not be changed. Trailers, RV's etc. in everyone's driveway is very unsightly. I read the summary on the city web site and it appears really the problem is not a good ordinance, but the manpower to enforce it. This is the only city I have ever lived in without a police department, that is who should be enforcing laws. It should never be a part of the Planning Department to enforce laws. If we can't enforce our current ordinance, changing it will not solve a problem. In fact, I bet it will increase the number of complaints as very few people understand the first ten feet of their driveway is the city's easement they can't use and that will need to be enforced. Right now it is illegal to park any trailers in the front set back and people do it all over the city. I fear that once you are allowed to park one trailer in the driveway it will surely lead to more and Chanhassen will look more like Richfield.. The garbage can ordinance has the same issue. Great idea to keep our neighborhoods nice looking by keeping the cans out of sight, but there is no one to enforce it. Garbage cans are stored all over people's property. I think the city should make the CSO's enforce laws and that Public Safety Department should be staffed with multiple people so there is coverage first and second shift, seven days per week. The county sheriff can get the third shift. You have a tough job and I appreciate your dedication to our city. Thanks, Pete Peter Keller 6760 Country Oaks Road Excelsior, MN 55331 1 Steckling, Jean From:Ryan, Elise Sent:Thursday, November 5, 2020 1:43 PM To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Fwd: Proposed changes to outdoor storage of boats/rv's etc. Hi MacKenzie, I wanted to forward this email to be added as review for the planning commission. Thanks. Elise ____________________________ ELISE RYAN Mayor City of Chanhassen 612.703.0598 (cell) Begin forwarded message: From: Kathy Kirkeby <kathykirkeby@aol.com> Date: November 5, 2020 at 9:02:49 AM CST To: "Ryan, Elise" <ERyan@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Proposed changes to outdoor storage of boats/rv's etc. Reply-To: Kathy Kirkeby <kathykirkeby@aol.com> Hi, I saw a post on Facebook that the city is proposing change of outdoor storage of boats/rv’s etc. I can only assume that they want to make the regulations even harder to store outside. That is so ridiculous. If people don’t want to have a neighbor that stores outdoor things then they should move to an association maintained neighborhood that doesn’t allow them. There are plenty (way too many) of those types of neighborhoods around. Why does the city make it so difficult to enjoy OUR property that we pay an exorbitant amount of taxes on? We purposely bought the house we did in 2017 because it is a .5+ acre lot and NOT part of an association, and had a pad for storing camper on side of garage. It was our fault for not fully researching, but we thought sweet we can build a garage on the open area next to the house to store our boat/trailer, etc. Well big mistake we found out later that the open area is an “outlot” that can’t be built on. We would have to spend all sorts of money having land survey to get the outlot rezoned if we wanted to put a garage on it and even no guarantee it would still be approved. So guess what, we said if the city is that dumb that we can’t build something to make it look nicer, we’ll just leave our stuff outside and save the $. You allow the new developments to put houses about 5 feet apart from each other, but we can’t add a garage where we have all sorts of space. So if you want to change regulations, change how close together the McMansions in this city can be built together. Kathy Kirkeby 8990 Quinn Rd 1 Steckling, Jean From:Joe McLellan <joe_mclellan@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, November 9, 2020 12:28 PM To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:In support of amending City Ordinance for outdoor storage of boats and trailers Hello, I am emailing to indicate my support for changing the current city ordinance for outdoor storage of boats and trailers. I support allowing residents to store boats and trailers in their driveways. Thanks for the consideration. Joe McLellan 6571 Kirkwood Circle Chanhassen, MN 55331 Minnewashta Creek Homeowners Association (MCHA) President 1 Steckling, Jean From:Aanenson, Kate Sent:Friday, November 13, 2020 9:10 AM To:Generous, Bob Subject:Fwd: Outdoor Storage of boats, trailers, RV’s campers Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Bob, Can you place these comments in the G: drive file that Mackenzie set up Kate Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Meuwissen, Kim" <kmeuwissen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: November 13, 2020 at 8:48:47 AM CST To: "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Outdoor Storage of boats, trailers, RV’s campers FYI -----Original Message----- From: M. J. Olson <mjkolson@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 8:46 AM To: Meuwissen, Kim <kmeuwissen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Outdoor Storage of boats, trailers, RV’s campers I would like to go on record as being against this policy change. We built our home in Chanhassen because we loved the well kept and clean neighborhoods. At that time we were part of a new development with enforced guidelines not allowing on street overnight parking, fences, or out buildings among other restrictions. Over the years these “rules” have been pushed. We currently live amongst several long term driveway storage situations and have complained. One of the reasons stated for adapting this guideline is lack of resources to enforce. If this type of storage has become such a problem with the current policy how bad do you honestly think it will be if you start allowing this storage? The city admits people abuse this guideline. I know of several homes on my street that already have garages full of “treasures”so their driveways store garbage bins, up to 3 cars and they street park as well. Some do have boats, campers or work trailers blocking sight lines now. We pay considerable property taxes because we choose to live in a nice neighborhood. This proposed change to allow outdoor storage will hurt our property values, and cause neighbor 2 friction between those that take pride in their neighborhoods and those that don’t. I don’t want to sit on my front porch or deck and look at a parked boat in a yard with weeds growing around it and a Menards tarp half tied and flapping when it’s not full of water and inviting mosquitoes. I don’t like telling someone we are the house between the work trailer and the camper across from the boat..... but right now I do because the current policy is not enforced... Can we trust the city to be able to enforce the sight line regulation if this amendment passes when they can’t control the situation now? What other safeguards do we need to abandon next because they are to hard to enforce. Stopping at stop signs on Galpin? Oh wait...We gave up on that already. Please give this careful consideration before making changes that will benefit those that won’t pay for off- site storage of their toys and punishes those of us who are responsible homeowners and neighbors. Mary Jane Olson 7461 Windmill Drive Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Sent from my iP From:Steckling, Jean To:Steckling, Jean Subject:FW: Outdoor storage Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 4:22:03 PM From: Maria Helena Moreno <nena1707@hotmail.com> Date: December 4, 2020 at 3:38:55 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Outdoor storage Hello I request that the city does not allow for driveway storage. Just because you have some residents not in compliance this should not result in amending this ordinance to loosen up these restrictions and have less administrative issues at the City. Many residents will for sure take this further and have many vehicles and not only recreational ones. I have already seen residents using residential property to store old trucks, junk vehicles and more. If you amended this ordinance you do have the potential of decreasing property values in the area. Chanhassen should keep its neighborhoods for residential use. If someone has these types of large vehicles there should be other storage sites for them. Please do not eliminate and/or expand this ordinance. The city can find ways to work with its residents for the benefit of everyone not just a few. Thank you Maria Helena Moreno 1 Steckling, Jean From:Aanenson, Kate Sent:Monday, November 16, 2020 10:25 AM To:Generous, Bob Subject:FW: Boat and Rec Vehicles Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed From: Walters, MacKenzie <MWalters@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 6:57 AM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fw: Boat and Rec Vehicles New boat comment From: Linda Nelson <linda.nelson05@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 7:23 PM To: Walters, MacKenzie Subject: Boat and Rec Vehicles As home owners, we support the ordinance change to allow boats, trailers and recreational vehicles to be stored in driveways even in the summer! Thanks, Linda Nelson 1 Steckling, Jean From:Steckling, Jean Sent:Tuesday, November 17, 2020 10:25 AM To:Generous, Bob Subject:Comments Bob, Can you add the following to the storage code amendment spreadsheet, please? It looks like you’re in it. Thanks. Jean Steckling Senior Administrative Support Specialist CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1106 FX. 952.227.1110 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us 1 Steckling, Jean From:Jeff and Barb PESHEK <peshek4@msn.com> Sent:Friday, November 6, 2020 6:38 PM To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Storage of recreational vehicles GobSmacked is the word i have for this Public hearing announcement. 1. It is not enforced , and people have been pushing to the limit over the years. Some neighbor hoods are starting to look hillbillyish and now you want to add . 2. We work hard to keep our house and yard nice and the reward will be to look out our windows at recreational equipment. 3. Taxes are high and this will definitely take enjoyment out of living in chanhassen, seeing the clutter in driveways. People have large boats, we are not talking small trailers etc. 4. This has been something that has frustrated over the years seeing all the junk , unkept recreational equipment stored around homes. 5. Lower taxes to be like Brooklyn Park if thats what its going to look like. 6. You do realize they will store friends equipment. This will be hard to enforce as it is and advantage will be taken. 7. Please Please , keep our neighborhoods looking like neighborhoods instead of storage yards. Jeff and Barb Peshek 6480 White dove drive Get Outlook for iOS 1 Steckling, Jean From:Konrad siefker <konrad_siefker@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 9, 2020 11:36 AM To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Outdoor Storage of Boats, Trailers and Recreational Vehicles on Residential Properties Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Hi MacKenzie, I wanted to write to you to voice my support of changing Chanhassen’s ordinance under Chapter 20 – Zoning, prohibiting driveway storage and allowing us to have reasonable use of our property. I’m not necessarily against the current ordinance but, I’ve always thought that in governance their should be fairness. The current ordinance is only enforced if your neighbor calls or emails the city. I’ve got a bully across from me who always threatens to call the city on hour 25 of my parking a boat in my driveway. He ignores the other neighbors with trailers parked in their driveway and they are free to use their property as they wish. All, I can do is comply or risk a ticket. I’ve got two young boys and a wife that is an ICU Nurse and it’s difficult to comply with this ordinance any time I want to use my boat and rush to get it back into storage. This fall I had a change is storage vendors so, I had a couple of week timeframe between availalbity. So I wouldn’t get a ticket I parked my boat in my neighbors driveway 1 block over as his neighbors are more reasonable. If there’s a law, then everyone should have to abide to it. If the law is unenforceable due to staffing restrictions or other economic reasons then it should be changed in a way that is fair to everyone or removed. Would there possibly be a vote on 11‐17 for this change or is this just up for discussion for a decision at a later date? Would the change be immediate or would it be effective at a later date? Thank you for your support, Konrad Siefker 612‐270‐6139 1 Steckling, Jean From:tysonp@gmail.com Sent:Monday, November 9, 2020 12:31 PM To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Outdoor Storage of Boats, Trailers and Recreational Vehicles on Residential Properties Hi MacKenzie, I wanted to write to you to voice my support of changing Chanhassen’s ordinance under Chapter 20 – Zoning, prohibiting driveway storage and allowing us to have reasonable use of our property. I too would like to be able to keep my small fishing boat in my driveway during the boating season. Regards, Tyson Paul 714.469.3862 From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Fwd: Outdoor Storage Ordinance Needs to Stay as Is Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 8:21:22 PM Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Johnston, Heather" <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: December 4, 2020 at 6:51:06 PM CST To: "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Outdoor Storage Ordinance Needs to Stay as Is Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Jessica Boevers <pbjz@hotmail.com> Date: December 4, 2020 at 6:37:08 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Outdoor Storage Ordinance Needs to Stay as Is Please keep the current ordinance as is, not allowing items to be parked in driveways and in open sight. 1) Allowing these items to be parked in driveways absolutely degrades the character of the city. 2) If up to 2 items could be parked in the owners driveway they will park their personal driving vehicles in the street which causes a safety issue. 3) Enforcing the current ordinance with a higher fee will encourage owners to comply. Thank you, Jessica Boevers From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Fwd: boat storage Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 8:21:08 PM Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Johnston, Heather" <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: December 4, 2020 at 6:50:55 PM CST To: "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: boat storage Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Rochelle Curtis <rochelle_curtis@yahoo.com> Date: December 4, 2020 at 6:26:20 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: boat storage I am against changing this policy. I do not think people should be able to store boats, RV's, and other things in front of their house. This devalues all of our properties and is not pleasant to look at. If you want to have these items, it is your responsibility to properly store them. We live within a city, not out on land out in the country. Please do not change this policy as it will contribute to the degradation of Chanhassen property. Sincerely, Rochelle and Chad Curtis From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:FW: PARKING ORDINANCE Date:Monday, December 7, 2020 6:50:20 PM From: Johnston, Heather <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 6:48 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: PARKING ORDINANCE Heather Begin forwarded message: From: gohkids@yahoo.com Date: December 7, 2020 at 6:43:00 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: PARKING ORDINANCE Reply-To: "gohkids@yahoo.com" <gohkids@yahoo.com> Christopher Goh 521 Shadowmere Dr. CHANHASSEN mn Change the ordinance to allow folks to use their toys in the appropriate season. Boats for Spring/Summer/Fall. Icehouses for the fall and spring etc. Introduce sensible ordinance such that yards don't become junkyards, whileenBling us to access our toys. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:FW: Outdoor Storage Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 4:13:37 PM From: Johnston, Heather <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 4:12 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Outdoor Storage Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Jeff Grover <jeffg@twmpls.com> Date: December 4, 2020 at 4:09:34 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Outdoor Storage I am not in favor of loosening the laws for outdoor storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles, etc Houses now already have cars parked outside as their garage is full of stuff(junk), by loosening the law will mean more stuff parked everywhere. If you can afford a boat or recreational vehicle you can afford offsite parking which is very cheap. Jeff Grover From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:FW: Trailer storage Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 4:13:55 PM From: Johnston, Heather <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 4:13 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Trailer storage Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Lidstone <pjlidstone@aol.com> Date: December 4, 2020 at 4:08:35 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Trailer storage Reply-To: Paul Lidstone <pjlidstone@aol.com> 2-Trailer storage should be allowed in the driveway of a residence. I support this new rule. Thanks Paul Lidstone 3991 Country Oaks Drive From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:FW: Outdoor Storage Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 4:14:29 PM From: Johnston, Heather <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 4:13 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Outdoor Storage Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Kim McReavy <ktmtmcreavy@msn.com> Date: December 4, 2020 at 3:36:42 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Outdoor Storage We are opposed to the ordinance proposal amending the storage of vehicles in the front yard or driveway of homes. One of the things that quickly makes a city look “junky” is the excessive storage of recreational vehicles in the front yard or driveway of a home. Take a drive through Mound if you need to see this in action. These vehicles or boats can sit for years, and be in any condition. If we go to sell our home and the neighbor next door has a big decrepit camper parked in the driveway, this can be a detriment to our property values. It can also cause strife between neighbors. We have seen this happen between neighbors in our own neighborhood. Owning a property does not automatically give one the right to do whatever they want on that property. This is why zoning laws exist. Allowing storage of recreational vehicles and boats in side yards or rear yards provides plenty of opportunity for the homeowner to store without impacting other neighbors. If code enforcement is the issue, perhaps hiring a specialist to deal solely with code conformance and enforcement issues is the answer. We do not believe that changing a long standing ordinance to accommodate those who can’t comply is a responsible solution for the majority of the City residents who do not choose to store items outdoors. Again, we are opposed to the changing of this ordinance and believe any change would be a slippery slope that would create more problems than it would solve. Kim and Tom McReavy 1350 Heather Court From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:FW: City ordinance of outdoor storage on residential property Date:Monday, December 7, 2020 10:08:54 AM From: M. J. Olson <mjkolson@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 9:31 AM To: City Council <Council@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: City ordinance of outdoor storage on residential property I would like to go on record as being adamantly against the proposed changes to the current ordinance. I have so many questions and concerns that were not adequately addressed at the City Planning meeting on Nov. 17th that I attended. It was stated that the reason the city is considering this change is due to lack of resources to enforce it. A planning member asked for a guess at how many complaints that might be. The answer from Kate was about one a week. That equates to about 52 a year. I realize these complaints are probably seasonal, but even still, I cannot believe that this is enough of a hardship to cause the changing of this ordinance. Who's idea was it that this was needed? That question was also asked off the record and the response was that a Council Member brought it up. I certainly hope this is not for their personal reasons as that seems an abuse of power situation. Why change the ordinance from allowing no driveway storage to up to two trailers or rv's? Another question was why the city did not do a mailing to citizens so that they would be notified of this proposed change. Publishing a small ad in the Villager that few actually receive or read and posting it on the Face Book city page that even fewer follow is not an adequate or responsible way to get the word out about a change to our landscape that is so detrimental Why did this important issue that will affect every homeowners property value and aesthetics have to happen in November and during a Covid upsurge when the Governor told us we shouldn't even have Thanksgiving with our families? If proper notice had been sent out in a normal non pandemic world I would think you would have seen more than two households show up for the planning meeting, more than than 20 letters concerning this and at least one phone in. Is that lack on notification or lack on need for any change? This issue needs to be tabled until it is safe to meet and discuss as a community. It feels like the city is trying to slide one in while the people are busy trying to survive a pandemic and all the stress that brings. We have lived in Chanhassen for over 27 years. The reason we built and moved to Chan was because it was clean and uncluttered with good property values. I know of several homes on my street that already have garages full of "treasures" and driveways full of garbage bins, cars and trucks. If they are going to be allowed to store up to two trailers or RV's, etc. on their driveways the motor vehicles will always be on the street. That makes for a messy and dangerous situation when you add school buses, garbage trucks, and delivery vans all swerving around the parked vehicles on narrow residential streets. then put your kids out there on bikes or dog walking... There goes the neighborhood. We pay considerable property taxes because we choose to live in a nice neighborhood and community. This proposed change will hurt our property values and cause neighbor friction between those that take pride in their surroundings and those that don't. I do not want to sit on my front porch or deck and look at a trailer park. We need the city's support to keep Chanhassen on the map as a good place to live! Please do not turn our community into a rural junk yard/storage area. What other ordinances will be abandoned next because the city doesn't have the resources to enforce? Running stop signs, raising pigs in your backyard? As you can tell by the length of this letter, I could go on. If the city is changing this ordinance because they do not have the resources to enforce it you are rewarding the residents that feel the rules do not apply to them and punishing the responsible residents that realize responsibility comes with ownership. Do we stop calling the access between the street and our garage a driveway and start referring to them as storage pads? Please drop this issue or at least table it until you have adequate community input for careful consideration before you make such a drastic change that will affect all of us. When our property values go down, so does the city's tax revenue. Please bring back some common sense and do not make a change to this ordiance. Mary Jane Olson 7461 Windmill Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Fwd: Outdoor storage Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 8:20:54 PM Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Johnston, Heather" <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: December 4, 2020 at 6:10:48 PM CST To: "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: FW: Outdoor storage Heather Johnston | City of Chanhassen PH. 952.227.1119 -----Original Message----- From: Cheryl Tigue <tigwa02@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 6:10 PM To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Outdoor storage We think the proposal it a great idea!! Thank you Ted and Cheryl Tigue Sent from my iPhone From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:Fwd: Changes to outdoor storage Date:Sunday, December 6, 2020 6:36:04 PM Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Johnston, Heather" <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Date: December 6, 2020 at 2:33:13 PM CST To: "Aanenson, Kate" <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Changes to outdoor storage Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Paulette Tomaschko <tomaschko10@yahoo.com> Date: December 6, 2020 at 1:57:14 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Changes to outdoor storage My hope is that the council strongly considers that boats, vehicles etc should not be stored in the front view of houses. It becomes so unsightly. Storage in the back side of the owner house, with minimal view to the neighborhood is fine! I get that people have toys to be stored, but stored out of front view site is preferred. Thank you Paulette Tomaschko 2842 Century Trail Chanhassen MN Sent from my iPhone From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:FW: Driveway storage of Trailers, boats etc. Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 4:14:18 PM From: Johnston, Heather <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 4:13 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: Driveway storage of Trailers, boats etc. Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Nora Wagner <norawagner@aol.com> Date: December 4, 2020 at 3:42:56 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Driveway storage of Trailers, boats etc. Reply-To: Nora Wagner <norawagner@aol.com> Hi City of Chanhassen, I think that the prohibition to be able to store any vehicle other than a car on one's driveway is not respecting a property owners' right to use their property in a reasonable manner. Especially during the summer season, boats and RVs are continually used and taken out of long term storage and will appear in and out of driveways. I think storage on one's driveway for the entire winter is an eyesore. At least have the stored unit placed on the side of the home for the winter months or find a winter storage place. That is often part of the cost of doing business as a boat, RV or trailer owner is to PAY FOR or FIND winter storage that is not on one's driveway. That would be a nice compromise between no driveway storage at all and winter storage elsewhere. Thank you, Nora Wagner Highover Drive resident From:Aanenson, Kate To:Walters, MacKenzie Subject:FW: boat/rv storage Date:Friday, December 4, 2020 4:14:07 PM From: Johnston, Heather <HJohnston@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 4:13 PM To: Aanenson, Kate <kaanenson@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Fwd: boat/rv storage Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Steve Yochum <steve.yochum@gmail.com> Date: December 4, 2020 at 3:48:58 PM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: boat/rv storage I'd ask the city approve the measures suggested by city staff found in the website link http://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/1667/Outdoor-Storage-of-Boats-Trailers-RVs Thank you, -- Steve Yochum 6214 Cascade Pass, Chanhassen, MN 55317 651-260-8120 1 Steckling, Jean To:Jean Steckling Subject:FW: Changes to Chapter 20 - Zoning From: Ciara Miller <ciara.klos@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 11:31 AM To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Changes to Chapter 20 ‐ Zoning Hello, I am writing to include my feedback/public comments on the proposed changes to Chapter 20 - Zoning related to the outdoor storage of boats, trailers and recreational vehicles on residential property. We are new to MN from out of state and are happy to make this city our new home for many years to come. One of the appeals of Chanhassen was the beautifully maintained residential communities and parks full of residents who take pride in the cleanliness and visual appeal of our city. While I can appreciate that people want to use their own property for storage, I hope there can be additional parameters and/or language included as to the permissible size, condition, etc. I have seen some ungodly large recreational vehicles resembling Cousin Eddie's from Christmas vacation and it's certainly not something I would like to look at in my neighbor's yard all year long. I realize condition and curb appeal is largely discretionary but it feels like you have to add something like that otherwise I fear it could be inviting people's yards to become temporary dumping grounds for dilapidated or inoperable items. Thanks for all you do, Ciara From:Steckling, Jean To:Steckling, Jean Subject:FW: Date:Monday, December 14, 2020 11:08:59 AM Heather Begin forwarded message: From: Steve Taborek <steve8022@gmail.com> Date: December 12, 2020 at 5:39:55 AM CST To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> I use a small trailer regularly for work and service to friends and family. I cannot afford indoor storage for this unit. I am grateful to keep this stored on my own property by the side of the house. Please do not restrict my use of my own property. Steve From:Steckling, Jean To:Steckling, Jean Subject:FW: outdoor storage Date:Monday, December 14, 2020 2:40:42 PM From: Joe Seifert <jseifert80@aol.com> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 2:15 PM To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: outdoor storage Please change this ordinance. Many more people today have boats and trailers. They are not the eye sore they used to be in 1972. I would appreciate that as long as the trailer or boat is well kept and in the person’s driveway, it is acceptable. This will help keep our streets clear as well. Again, please change so that we can store boats and trailers in our driveways. Thanks, Joseph Seifert Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:Steckling, Jean To:Steckling, Jean Subject:FW: Approve of boat and trailer parking in driveways Date:Monday, December 14, 2020 2:46:09 PM From: Joe McLellan <joe_mclellan@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2020 2:35 PM To: Public Comments <publiccomments@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: Approve of boat and trailer parking in driveways Hello, I am emailing to express my approval of the change to allow residents to park boats and trailers in their driveways. It is too much of a financial and logistical burden to find storage of a boat or trailer. As long as driveways don't turn into RV parking lots and views are not obstructed this is a great change for the city. Thank you, Joe McLellan 6571 Kirkwood Circle Minnewashta Creek HOA President Street Curb (paved surface below) Front Lot line (right-of-way below) House Driveway Existing Ordinance Can Store (rear and side yard) Cannot Store (Front Yard, Right of Way, and Driveway) Street Curb (paved surface below) Front Lot line (right-of-way below) House Driveway Proposed Ordinance Can Store (rear, side yard, and driveway) Cannot Store (Front Yard and right-of-way) CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 17, 2020 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steven Weick, Mark Randall, Doug Reeder, Laura Skistad, Eric Noyes, and Mark Von Oven MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael McGonagill STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; and Matt Kerr, IT Support Specialist PUBLIC PRESENT: Connie and Joe Perttu 681 Sierra Trail MJ and Al Olson 7461 Windmill Drive Weick: Just a quick review of the guidelines for this evening’s meeting. This is a Zoom meeting and we are getting I think good at it. Please be patient with us as we work through different types of phone and other methods of communicating. Please, to the commission members please do not hold conversations, chats or instant messages outside of this meeting with each other. All of our discussions must be public and on the public record. Again we have one item on tonight’s agenda. Staff will present the item. Planning Commission will have a chance to ask questions or clarifications of staff. We don’t have an applicant right? Aanenson: No, we’re the applicant, yep. Weick: Right. And after staff’s presentation and questions we will have a public hearing. We will summarize any emails that have been sent in and they will be read for the record. I believe those are summarized for us in the presentation. Anyone present in chambers may come forward and for their opinion of this item for the record. And we will also take telephone calls and a number will come up on the screen at the appropriate time if you are watching. At that time we will close the public once we’ve heard from everybody and everybody will be heard. We’ll close the public hearing and at that time the Planning Commission can comment and consider motions and a vote. This evening again we have one item. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A CODE AMENDMENT REGULATING THE OUTDOOR STORAGE OF BOATS, TRAILERS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 2 Aanenson: Thank you Chairman. I think it might be helpful too tonight that if after we make our presentation that we take the public comment before we go around the Planning Commission because the public hearing might be a lot of genesis of some of the questions so. Weick: So your presentation directly into, okay. Aanenson: Yeah unless that’s something that is a burning question that we missed on that but I think that might help in the summary there too so. As you mentioned Chair the Planning Commission just makes recommendations so this item does go to the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. So this, the genesis for this code amendment was based on the fact that there’s been some residents who have expressed a desire to store boats and trailers or recreational vehicles on their property. …history in our staff report goes back, the history goes back to the 70’s. 1972 and it said all storage had to be in the back yard and then that was modified to put it into a side yard. As we pointed out over time some of those lots in those PUD’s only have a 5 foot, 7 foot setback, side yard setback so it doesn’t always accommodate. And then in 1986 the storage of vehicles, again as I mentioned moved to the side yards. Again this ordinance has been in place for a number of years. I think people are kind of used to it and but there has been a lot of push to say you know, why can’t we put them in the driveway so what this amendment proposes to do is kind of look at all sides and come up with a potential solution. So the proposed solution is really look at one boat trailer or recreational vehicle be located within the driveway limits just storage the maximum of these two items in the outdoors. Adoption performance would mitigate any impact to the driveways so if you look through there’s 6 main criteria that were identified as concerns. And potentially those have changed you know. The storage area, and that storage area, one of the things we want to make that was identified is the storage area that it didn’t go over, because we wanted to make sure there’s sight lines if someone’s backing up that they can see around the neighbor’s driveway. You know whether it’s an RV or a large sailboat so that was one of the issues that was addressed. And then in addition to that the second was, has to do with the side yard setbacks, the 5 yard setback. We talked about that. It’s no, that’s kind of been the more prevalent one especially in the PUD’s so, but that flexibility of that and then whether or not there was hard cover so looking at how much hard cover would be added if you tried to enforce that sort of thing so right now people that are parking on their side or in their rear yard, typically that’s where you see the RV’s. They’re not always on hard surface and sometimes people put the rock on the side to accommodate that sort of need so those are some of the issues that we looked at too. And then the four was the size. Again an RV is a lot different than maybe a fishing boat. Looking at that sort of thing again. Looking at the setbacks to make sure that that’s being accommodated so you’re not creating a sight line. In addition to that you know there are a number of subdivisions that are governed by a homeowner’s association. Those homeowner’s association also regular outdoor storage but the City does not enforce those sort of things so this did not supersede that. Any HOA would have preference over that. So again staff believes that the limits, the indirect limits creating those vehicles would be in the front line. Addressed some of the concerns regarding sight lines and the hard cover and the like so just outdoor storage in general. Again people in the summer, they’re in, they’re out and some of it for the staff is that if you get a complaint you go out there and then Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 3 the neighbor says well I had it out for a couple days and it’s back in. Sometimes it’s a little hard to enforce to stay on top of those kind of issues. So many other cities permit outdoor storage in the driveway and prohibition again as I mentioned is difficult so the proposed changes would kind of make a more common practice within the city and still allow some outdoor storage. So as a part of this exercise MacKenzie Young-Walters on our staff who wrote this ordinance surveyed a number of other cities and looked at what they do and everybody, it’s kind of all over the map. Some don’t allow any. Some say seasonally and the number. Typically limits for the number of vehicles. The type of vehicles. The length of the vehicles. The height of the vehicles. Curb setbacks. Demonstration of viable alternatives so if you have nowhere else to put it then you could put it in the driveway. And then the required side setback. Again typically there must be, meet the building setbacks so, so it wouldn’t project if the garage is the, or the fence is the furthest point going forward then it couldn’t exceed that so then the number of vehicles. Some had no limit and some had limits on the numbers of vehicles and then permitted surface. Whether or not that was improved surface or unimproved. Again that’s one of the things that we run up against to. A lot of times people are parking them on the side yard want to put some sort of improved surface for them so that came into play so again while this is good anecdotal information every city kind of reflects their unique attributes. Whether there’s a lot of lakes in the community like we have in Chanhassen have a number of lakes and along for that so this proposed change would allow trailer and boat or recreational vehicle be stored in the driveway. It limits the property the storing a maximum of trailed boats or recreational vehicles. So if you had a, maybe a camper with a snowmobile trailer, you know fishing boat with some other type of trailer, looking at those sort of things as being part of the two. So includes boats and trailers and provision requiring stored items to be clean, well kept and operable condition. So and that’s the same process we do if there’s unlicensed vehicles stored in your driveway. Those are also, those would get a letter from code enforcement on that too if it’s unlicensed or inoperable so as not to be junky. So again prohibit the storing of extraneous materials within the recreational vehicles so again to be kept in slightly. You know maybe there’s like a topper on, or the like so the proposed code amendment represents a change to the highly visible long standing city ordinance so we really wanted to make sure that we raised awareness of this. We put an ad in the paper. It’s been out on our Facebook and then we wanted to make sure that we had the opportunity for a lot of feedback to provide comment on a number of social media platforms. So we did received some feedback. I’m not going to try to read the whole thing so but we did receive I would say it’s 60/40, 50/50 it’s pretty close so the first comment came in before we met tonight so it wasn’t actually formalized yet so…that person may want to speak. So the next one would be from Grover, Jeff Grover against the proposed changes. Many people have too many cars in their driveway already and so then there’s the Jeff and Barb Piesheck against the changes. If not enforced maybe it could look awful. People…relatives, friends maybe they might store their boats there so it’s kind of different like when you store maybe a docking rights it has to be in your name. The boat, you can’t be leasing out your storage space. I guess that’s kind of what that concern might be there so then the comment from Ms. Simpler, enforcement difficult to comply with, unfair enforcement. Difficult to comply with existing and we would concur with that. I mean it is hard right now to enforce you know if someone sends us, a typical process is we would send out a letter that says you’re in violation. You get so many days to rectify the Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 4 situation and maybe the boat’s moved but not for long and then it comes back so, so then McRyan’s support the change… Steven Brown…damaging landscaping. That’s another problem we talked about. If you have shrubs or trees or something and you’re not going to get your storage in the side yard so they are not looking… Mary Jane Olson. Against the policy change. Already complained that there’s a lot of driveway storage in neighborhoods that can change the property values and aesthetics. And that’s the one complaint we get right now when someone’s having maybe a graduation party or wedding group and they don’t want to have to do their group to have to look at the outdoor storage. Then…someone supports ordinance. Change to allow boats, trailers, recreational vehicles be stored in the driveways even in the summer. Then Jeffrey Williams absolutely not. Each one has some…regarding this. Chanhassen…should the ordinance change so our property values, you could add garbage cans to out of sight too. We do try to enforce that. That’s another that is difficult to enforce. People put them out in the morning. Go to work late that night so that is, they don ‘t pick up the next morning. That one too we’re supposed to be behind. That’s one we do enforce. To go back to the other comment about long time to change. This is something if the council did choose to act on it that we would really do a large media launch on this and talk what the rule change would be. If it didn’t change you know talk about we didn’t or the council didn’t change it to make sure that people understand that. Doug Peterson, don’t see a modification with staying in place at this time in relations to outside storage. Allen Nickolai, the less government intervention the better. Pete Keller enforce the current ordinance. It’s meant to keep our neighborhoods looking nice. Krissy Erwall. Outdoor storage in the winter sure. Outdoor storage if used, outdoor storage junk in back yard and we do get that complaint too. Sometimes people put an RV or boat in the back yard and that can also be unsightly. Sometimes someone’s back yard might be somebody’s side yard so. And then the last one we got today was from Alan Goshen. I personally think that if the resident wants to store their boat and trail, RV in their driveway, that’s perfectly fine. I prefer to see the alternative of putting them on the grass next to the house. I’d like to see the residents move at least to the side of their house if the driveway allows for it these objects move to the side of the house as much as their driveway allows and again that’s sometimes the length of the side yard isn’t large enough then that’s something we could take into consideration then that maybe they shouldn’t have it there so these are all factors that we thought about too. You know maybe it doesn’t make sense so with that we went through, I’d take any questions on the ordinance itself before we open up the public hearing but what I would recommend then is opening it up for comments but before we do that I’d be happy to answer just any general questions that the Planning Commission, just general questions on the ordinance and then we would, yep. Weick: Yeah the public will be just in a minute. I’m going to open it for Planning Commissioners if there’s any specific that you would like clarified about the code change with Kate we can do that at this time. And I think I’ll give people a chance. I’ll start. Can you clarify the before and after position on duration so long things can be stored on the property? Aanenson: Well the duration, there is no limit on that. Weick: There is not, okay. I just wanted it clarified. Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 5 Aanenson: So right now if it’s on the site so, that’s the way they’re supposed to be. So if you take it out of the lake it’s supposed to be in your side yard. Sometimes people say they’re going to go out again in a couple of days so that’s kind of that chase that we’re always making and that’s where the complaints come in. It’s like well why do I have to put it away when I’d be out again in 2 days. Weick: And we’re not proposing a change to that policy moving forward? Aanenson: Right. What we’re saying is you could have it parked in the driveway, yep. Weick: Right, okay. Any other, any questions or clarifications specifically on the code? Reeder: Mr. Chairman what’s our position on the hard surface? Weick: We do not have a requirement. Aanenson: Correct. We do not have a requirement that that be on hard surface. I think some people are reticent to take them off the driveway because they don’t want to park it in the grass so therefore often they’ll put rock or patio blocks or the like to get a hard surface on the side or the rear yard so they’re not parked on the grass. And it’s easier to get it out in the spring. Weick: So there’s no, there were no requirements for hard surface before or after? Aanenson: Correct except that we would assume that the driveway would be the hard surface. Weick: I’m sorry, yeah. Aanenson: No worries. Noyes: Commissioner Noyes here. Is there any requirements related to setback from the property line from a neighbor’s property? Aanenson: No. That’s a good question. So right now if you’re in your side yard setback there is none so I think that sometimes is a rub depending on the location. So the proposed ordinance says you have to, you can’t be over that property line. The sight line. Currently if you put it in your side yard that’s the one thing that there’s no natural setback from. If you were to put any other structure, a deck or something like that there would be a setback because was viewed back in the 70’s as temporary and has never evolved from that. It could be a while for the winter. Weick: But there’s a front yard setback for the driveway. Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 6 Aanenson: It goes with this one correct and that’s for sight line purposes, correct. Reeder: Mr. Chairman Commissioner Reeder. Tell me again what you just said about the side yard and the front yard. Aanenson: So there could be a front yard setback. So limiting that. The storage. The length of a vehicle would be affected so they’re not exceeding the front yard setback. But currently today if you wanted to park a boat in your side yard there is no setback. So if you had 10 feet and your boat width was 9 ½ and you could fit it in there, that would be permitted. Reeder: In the front yard. Weick: In the side yard. Reeder: Side yard. Aanenson: Yep. Reeder: But what is being proposed you could put it in the front yard in the side yard setback. Aanenson: No. Just in the driveway on the front yard setback. Reeder: I’m sorry, I can put my boat beside my driveway in the setback or not under the proposed? Aanenson: The proposed allows you to put it on your driveway. So you’re on a hard surface. You’re on your driveway so it’s easier for you to get it in and out to use. Not having to back it up, put it into your side yard. Reeder: So you’re saying you cannot put it in the side yard. Aanenson: The goal is to allow you to put it in your driveway, correct. Weick: I’ll give it a shot. As it stands today you can put a trailer, RV, boat in your side yard if it does not protrude past the front of your house so it can’t stick out past the front of your house and it can go as close to, there is no setback rule so it can go as close to your side yard property line as long as you don’t go over that, right? So if you have 10 feet on your side yard, Kate’s point was you could put a 9 ½ foot trailer there wide but you couldn’t put a 10 ½ trailer because you’d be into your neighbor’s property at that point. With the new proposal that doesn’t change. So you can still store trailers and RV’s that way or you can put them in your driveway. The setback for the driveway is from the street so there is a, every property has a front yard setback. It’s usually 10 feet and I’m guessing ish so you cannot encroach, so you couldn’t park your RV or trailer within that 10 feet of the street roughly, and don’t quote me on that but it’s roughly 10 Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 7 feet. So you couldn’t have it real close to the street where people couldn’t see potentially if they were pulling out of their driveway or something. If a neighbor was pulling out or if there was a sidewalk, you can’t block the sidewalk. Aanenson: So the language that we’re proposing is on page 11 of the staff report and so what we’re saying is that, just as you said Chairman, it allows you the additional opportunity to park it in your driveway but so what we struck out is the old, it used to say you could only put it in your side and rear. That’s the only place it could be stored. So now we’re giving the flexibility to put it on your driveway. We’re not saying you can add additional hard cover and put it on your side yard. If you want to continue to use your side yard because that’s obviously out of sight, that’s your choice but it does allow you the opportunity to store it on your driveway. Reeder: Mr. Chairman, Commissioner Reeder. Weick: Yeah. Reeder: Why are we not allowing it in the side yard setback next to the driveway? Aanenson: In the front yard? Reeder: In the front yard. Sitting next to the driveway where mine is. Aanenson: Well we felt it was probably more sight aesthetic when you’re pushing it closer to someone else’s property in the front yard as opposed to behind the house where you don’t have the line of sight. So I think part of the challenge there too is, by default it creates what you can store on your driveway. So if you put your RV and your additional off to the side in the front and you can still put 2 or 3 cars in there so it’s, having a boat or trailer there it’s limiting the capacity so it’s kind of a capacity issue. So it comes down to aesthetics too. Reeder: The problem is if you put your boat or trailer in your driveway you can’t get your out of the garage. Aanenson: Correct. That’s what I’m talking about it’s a capacity issue, right. Reeder: So essentially you’re not allowing them to store it in the driveway. Weick: There’s going to be potential limitations with several different types of properties. There could be driveway limitations. There certainly could be side yard limitations. We have a lot of different types of property designations that have very small side yards and side yard setbacks. That’s a limitation right? They can’t put trailers on the side of their house because it’s not wide enough. And unfortunately those conditions exist. I think we’re doing our best to try and talk about proposing something that you know potentially helps, you know helps the Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 8 situation. Certainly if we’re not helping it then we should consider that as well. But yeah it certainly isn’t going to solve it for every home and for every situation. Von Oven: Just another clarification point I guess. Where do, where would personal watercraft fall under this definition? Is that a boat? Is it a recreational vehicle or is it not covered by this language? Aanenson: The way…boat or a trailer in the city code. Von Oven: Okay so we would say a pwc is a boat? Aanenson: Yes. Von Oven: Okay got it. And then this is a really dumb question but I’m going to ask it anyway. Because boats and trailers are called out separately, if one has a boat on a trailer is that two? Does that now make the maximum that they are allowed to store? Aanenson: No. Von Oven: So a boat trailer combination is one. Aanenson: Correct, that is assumed. The same as a snowmobile and a snowmobile trailer. That would be, yep. Or it could be a trailer with some canoes on it. That would be considered the one. Von Oven: Got it, okay thank you. Weick: Commissioner Randall it looked like you were trying to say something before. Randall: I had the exact same question. I do have a question about enforcement. Who determines if a vehicle is operable or not and how is the code enforced? Aanenson: Yeah so that’s how we’re enforcing vehicles right now. So typically those are complaint basis. Maybe it hasn’t moved all summer and so that would just be an inquiry. Or maybe it’s been sitting there for 2 or 3 years and hasn’t moved so that would be complaint driven. Randall: Okay. Aanenson: Just to be clear I said that in the beginning too. We don’t have the staff to go around and driving looking for those kind of things so just like any other, trash being left out or something, those are all complaint driven. Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 9 Weick: Anyone else right now for Kate? Okay great, we will have a chance again to talk. Do not worry but at this time I would like to open the public hearing portion. Kate did summarize the emails and/or calls we received prior and thank you Kate for that. That was very helpful. At this time anyone present who would like to come forward and offer an opinion on this item please do so. Just state your name and address for the record and then I would ask that you, there’s plastic over the microphone and just talk as loud as you can so everyone can year you. Joe Perttu: Testing? Keep the mask on? Weick: That’s your choice. That’s fine. Joe Perttu: Good, good. Thank you for the opportunity to talk. My name is Joe Perttu. This is my wife Connie. We live at 681 Sierra Trail in Chanhassen. 681 Sierra Trail so we overlook Kerber Pond and it’s funny to me that the person that actually created a lot of these complaints isn’t even here right now I mean to address why you know he felt like it was his duty to complain because obviously this is complaint driven. That’s the way that I was told that after 15 years of living here that we have to move our boat off the driveway. I had some notes here I was taking. Can you continue to talk? Connie Perttu: Well I mean our’s has always been in the winter, we have a storage place for it in the winter but in the summer you know it’s like, we have like a 3 wide driveway but a 2 car garage so in that third area is where it’s stored. Joe Perttu: And it’s improved. It’s tarred. Connie Perttu: And we have a, you know it’s always clean in perfect shape and has a cover on it and everything too. I mean it’s never been an issue there. Joe Perttu: Also I’d like to add that in the winter time we do store it somewhere else so it’s not on the driveway. I understand the situation where people don’t want all kinds of clutter. I think we all are here to make sure the city stays beautiful and we’re not over using it with old rickety junk that doesn’t work so I mean I think the establishment does some guidelines of that car ought to be usable or off the driveway for at least a portion of the summer. I think we can all agree that that’s reasonable, right. So for me it’s a financial issue too. Like I say when, if I was not able to keep my boat on the driveway I mean it costs me about $400 to have it stored for the summertime and it’s far less convenient to use and you know recreational vehicles are, they’re to be used and hopefully you can get them out without having to take a drive for 10 minutes or so. I want to make sure that you understood that I have improved property. Improved surface. Again 3 stalls. We have that third stall for this particular purpose. To park a boat and we happen to be one of those homes that do not have enough of a side yard. It’s not like I have a cruiser boat that is ready for the ocean here. We’re talking about a 19 foot boat. Just a regular fishing boat but it’s like 9 ½ feet wide at the base of the trailer and I’ve got like a 9 foot 8 inch side yard and it ain’t going in there that’s for sure so thank you for your patience but I just wanted to let Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 10 you know there’s financial impacts to these families that would have to move their vehicles off the driveway and I find it nonsensical. Again we’ve been here for 15 years and we have a very nice home and none of our neighbors are complaining about my boat on the driveway so. Connie Perttu: I just have one quick question on this as well. Is there a limit to how many cars can be in the driveway? Are those conditions of the cars that are there? Are there any of those codes? Aanenson: No. Connie Perttu: I’m just curious, okay. Aanenson: So just to be clear this is allowing, this ordinance amendment allows to keep your boat in your driveway. Connie Perttu: Yeah, right. Just checking to see… Weick: And cars are not included. Aanenson: Cars are not included. Connie Perttu: How many cars someone wants in their driveways. Aanenson: That would be a nuisance if they’re blocking or sight lines, yep. Connie Perttu: Got it. Joe Perttu: Thank you for your time. Weick: Thank you very much. Anyone else wishing to come forward. Just please state your name and address and talk loudly into the microphone if you can. Mary Olson: Hi, I’m Mary Olson. I live at 7461 Windmill Drive. Weick: Welcome. Mary Olson: I’ve lived in Chanhassen at this current location 26 years. We were one of the neighborhoods that had the covenants where we had our own bylaws and for the most part everybody followed them and they over the years have kind of gotten lax. Disappeared. People have moved, moved out, never saw the covenants and I get that but we’re very concerned about our neighborhood and the way that it looks and I understand it’s an issue trying to get around and enforce this but I think it’s very important because we already have a lot of people that are taking advantage of it or you wouldn’t be getting the complaints and I appreciate the way that you guys Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 11 are handling it with your boat and you have a nice boat and you have it clean and you keep it in a hard surface area and, but not everybody is that responsible and we currently have people, you talked about the garbage bins. They’re not just left out overnight. They’re there every day, every night, always because that’s where they keep them and there’s the recycling bin. The garbage bin. The yard waste bin. Then we’re now going to let them have 2 boats. Most of them have 3 vehicles so those vehicles are going to end up in the street so that they can come and go and I’m just very concerned about the people, unfortunately we’re not all responsible and you always have the ones that push it and I’m not saying we need to complaint about everybody and everything that they do. We have to get along. I understand that but there also has to be some way to kind of push responsibility on the ones that take advantage and that’s my concern. Thank you. Weick: Thank you very much. Anyone else that would like to come forward may do so at this time. I don’t know if we want to show the phone number as well. We have the phone number up as well. We’ll just give that a minute. I’ll take that time to say thank you to everyone who took the time to come in this evening and meet with us, especially with the health issues and everything like that. I can speak for the entire Planning Commission when I say that I don’t believe that there’s a more important voice than the voice we hear from neighbors and residents on issues, especially issues like this. It’s something that we were talking about earlier and we all, you know we all have opinions but it’s so important to hear everybody’s opinion and to really weigh that heavily. Especially if we’re thinking about making a code change. So thank you and thank you to everybody who emailed or called in prior as well. With that the phone’s not ringing so I will close the public hearing portion of tonight’s matter and open it up now for commissioner discussion and comments and/or motions. Skistad: Commissioner I would just like to confirm that I believe that there’s covenants already in the neighborhood that this does not supersede the covenant so if a neighborhood has bylaws set up they still follow their bylaws so I just wanted to, that’s just a point of clarification. Aanenson: That would be correct, yep. Weick: As we’re thinking about this I jotted a couple notes that I ask the commissioners to think about. You know it’s a big decision to make a code change obviously and I would say consider you know in your opinion do you feel like we’re improving the situation or the physical appearance of the city. I think that’s an important thing. That’s something I was considering as I was reading through this is, you know we want to be sure that we’re not doing something that is detrimental to the overall appearance so I would ask you to keep that in mind as well. You know that being said I think you can make, I mean I’ve seen boats and RV’s stored around the city in a lot of different ways. I’ve seen them look really good in driveways. I’ve seen them look not so great in driveways. I’ve seen them look really great in the side yard and I’ve seen cases where I’m like wow, I wouldn’t want to look at that in my side yard right so I think that that scale can go either way as far as aesthetics are concerned. I’m just kind of thinking out loud but hopefully that helps as you think about this item. Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 12 Von Oven: I know in the report it said we don’t have the staff to proactively monitor. Do we have stats on in a given year how many, I don’t even know what to call this but how many front yard boat related complaints we receive that we then react to and try to deal with? Is that a weekly thing? Is that a monthly thing? Is that everyday? Aanenson: Not everyday. I would say there’s probably one every week or two for sure, yeah. Audience: With different people or? Aanenson: Yes. Yeah. Weick: Maybe as people are thinking about this and thinking about if they want to read a motion or not, I will, I’ll walk through what are kind of the six areas that were laid out in the report and as I understand it what the revision to the code would include. The first was driveway. Right now we do not permit RV’s or boats and trailers in the driveway. Under the code amendment we would allow up to one in the driveway. As it’s written. Aanenson: Up to two. Weick: Up to two as it’s proposed. Aanenson: Correct. Weick: Okay, thank you. Kind of was wrong on that. For side yard setbacks there’s no side yard setback other than what the property line that exists today and that would continue. We do not have any requirements for the surface to be finished underneath the vehicle or the trailer and that would move forward except the understanding that a driveway is finished, that’s an assumption. Aanenson: Correct. Weick: There’s no change, there are no size requirements today and there’s no change to that. This is one I probably need your help on Kate. The number of vehicles, as I understand it right now is unlimited. Just RV’s and boats and trailers. Aanenson: Two. Weick: It is two today? Aanenson: No, now that’s unlimited you’re correct. Weick: It is unlimited and it would be going to a maximum of two. Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 13 Aanenson: Correct. Weick: Okay. And then there’s no change to the duration. Aanenson: And then just to clarify again, you kind of said this but this is to Commissioner Reeder’s comment. So you can still park in the side yard but you can’t go past the front yard setback. So if you still choose to put it in your side yard, some people have hard surface on the side…but you can still continue but you can’t move it to the front of the house and put it in the side yard. It can’t extend past of the house. Weick: Which is no different than today. Aanenson: That’s exactly right so that wouldn’t change. So you could still continue to put it on the side. Von Oven: So just to clarify Commissioner Reeder is currently breaking the law. Weick: Don’t make this more difficult. So on the first thing I’m going to kind of throw out maybe the first curve ball to this but when you think about the driveway I’m just posing a question to my fellow commissioners. Would it make sense to limit the number of vehicles in the driveway? Does that make any difference at all in your opinions? In other words it’s one thing, you know one RV or trailer in the driveway and then somewhere else. That would be your two instead of two in the driveway. I don’t know. I’m just asking that question. Von Oven: I’m glad you asked the question actually because I was under the understanding that that’s the way the code is currently written. So if I’m page 11, Section 4, Part A, one impacted vehicles in the driveway and then I read it to say Part B says they can also be stored over there but somewhere along here there’s a maximum of two. So Part 4(A) to me says that only one can be in the driveway. Aanenson: That’s how it’s written, that’s correct. Von Oven: Okay. So I believe that from the way I read it there is a one vehicle, boat trailer limit in the driveway and then if I have another one and I want to throw it in the back or on the side yard as long as it doesn’t protrude into my neighbor’s yard then that’s okay so I think that limit actually already exists. Weick: Okay, thank you for that clarification. Maybe that’s where I remember it from. Okay. Audience: Are we allowed to speak at all? Weick: We’ve closed the public portion. Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 14 Reeder: Mr. Chair? Weick: Yes sir. Reeder: I think we’re not solving the whole problem that I see here. There are in my estimations a number of recreational vehicles, boats or whatever on the side yard in the front yard now and at same time we’re trying to deal with the problem that there are people parking in the driveway. I would argue that there are a similar number of people that are parking on the side yard in the front of the house and there are houses that have no side yard possible to on their side of the house so I think that we should allow whatever number we agree on to be parked also in the side yard in the front yard. Weick: If I could just get clarification on that. You really mean front yard. You don’t mean side yard, you mean the front yard. Aanenson: All the way to the property line. Reeder: I mean in front of the house in the side yard. Off the driveway. Do you understand? Weick: I guess yeah. And I think that would be, I mean today that’s not permitted and I think it would not be permitted in the new code either. Aanenson: Right and that’s what he said. Reeder: With that I would suggest that we should change it and I might offer that amendment because I think you’re only solving part of the problem that staff is trying to deal with. They will be able to get rid of all the non-conforming vehicles that they have that are now also on the side of the driveway in the front. Weick: Okay. Any other thoughts on that point from Commissioner Reeder from other Commissioners. Von Oven: I think I would maybe offer a different opinion. I think while there’s probably no perfect code amendment that is going to solve this problem perfectly in every single person’s best interest, I was really impressed by everything that this hit on the way through. Everything from not making people create more paved surfaces so that we live in a concrete jungle but limiting the number of vehicles that could actually be put in the driveway to one when it comes to these boat and trailers and RV’s. I think expanding it to say go ahead and put everything in the front yard whether it’s on the side of the front yard or in the driveway or in the middle of the front yard I think that creates a little more mayhem for, I forget who said it but the people who are not really conforming. The people who don’t have things kind of put together and they want it on display in the front yard so I would not, I would not be in favor of expanding it to the rest of Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 15 the front yard. I think the whole point of all of this is trying to keep things in your own yard. Out of the view of your neighbors but we’re going to allow one in the driveway. You know if I think about how many calls we’re getting a year and now I’m just going to make up statistics because we don’t know but if we’re getting a call a week right, what are the chances that all 52 of those are for somebody’s boat that is on the side of the driveway versus in the driveway right, so I disagree that we’re not going to be solving any of the problem. I think this actually will solve a lot of the problem. It’s still going to leave something to be desired but I’d be open to ideas of how to perfectly solve this so I am in favor of what’s being proposed here. I know there will be some push back but I think, if I think about the best way to allow what we should be allowing people to do on their property without creating mayhem in the front yard, I think this is a nice balance that along the way as this goes to City Council might there be an amendment to it that makes it even better? Maybe but I think it’s a really, really good start. Weick: Thank you. Skistad: And I would second what he said. I agree with him. I thought MacKenzie did a fabulous job writing this up and listed all the issues and it was very clear overall why we’re looking at the changes and some of the best ways to go about that. Aanenson: If I may Chairman, I think one of the things we talked about internally is this is a big change and so we want to, you can start an ordinance on a certain date so we anticipate maybe this is the summer. We started at the end of the summer, we spend some time because there are people that are non-conforming and have been for a while. So to, so we could start that adoption at a later date but spend the summer educating people the direction, the general direction that you choose to go and try to get compliance and conformance and explain all that. Noyes: Chairman, Commissioner Noyes. I would also agree with Commissioner Von Oven. I think the word that he used that I think really kind of epitomizes this is balance. This isn’t going to be perfect but I think we’ve got to balance the needs of the people who have the boats and the RV’s and whatever to store with the views of the neighbors in that neighborhood. There’s many more people that are not storing things in their yard than there are and some of those people are not real happy about you know their neighborhood having a different look because of all of this but I also think we’ve got to make sure that we have solutions for people that do have these things and I think the way it’s set right now is I think that balance is struck pretty well and would be against expanding this so that the front yard was included in it. I think that would start to really kind of change what we’re trying to do here and I think push the balance too far in one direction so that’d be my comment. Weick: Thank you. Randall: Commissioners I also feel the same way. I feel maybe some comments about the balance. These were really good. People that know me know that I believe in personal property rights. However there are, this is a good balance. It allows for people to still have these items in Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 16 their driveway. It’s just not wanting to accumulate to the point where it becomes a problem so I think it’s a good balance for the neighbors that have to look at this stuff and also to that these people who want to have these items also. That’s all I’ll say. Weick: Thanks Commissioner Randall. Sounds like we’re working towards a decision which is nice. I think balance is hard. We’re taking the harder route having to get to this point. I think it’s easier to say all or nothing you know, those are easier things to do. I think it’s much more difficult to try and reach a balance. And I will admit I struggle. In one minute I think awesome and then in the next minute I think what are we creating but I think at the end of the day there’s a situation that already exists here and I think we’re, I think we’re trying to help. I do. Von Oven: So here’s what I would offer for folks who may not know. So we’re the Planning Commission and as you said right we have the opportunity to take what MacKenzie has created and move it forward to City Council but we’re not the end all to be all. So at the end of the day the City Council has to vote on this and as much as I think we have an important role to play, I think people pay a lot more attention when things go to City Council than when they come to Planning Commission so it’s my hope that if we as a council approve this, or recommend this tonight and it goes before City Council it will get a bit more attention and it’s also my hope that people will offer potential amendments to even make this better. I’m fine personally with it as it is but as a city we might be able to group think our way to a slightly even better motion so with that I would offer a motion. That the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to Chapter 20, Zoning of the Chanhassen City Code concerning the outdoor storage of boats, trailers and recreational vehicles. Weick: We have a valid motion from Commissioner Von Oven. And do we have a second? Randall: I’ll second that. Weick: A fervent second from Commissioner Randall. Before we vote I give anyone a chance to offer any last opinion for the record. I would say that I don’t believe we are suggesting any changes to what’s been written and proposed by staff. I guess that’d be one of the purposes that we have which is, is there anything that we found that we would like to see added or changed from the new code as it’s written and so I think we’re by offering this motion we’re saying you know we’re good with this code kind of moving past this step in the process. So we have a valid, anyone else? That was really rude. Is there anyone else that would like to make comment about the item before we vote? Reeder: Mr. Chair? Weick: Yes sir. Reeder: I’m going to vote for this motion because I do agree with staff that this moves in the right direction. My thought was that it could move even a little further but I think that’s Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 17 something that we could take up maybe several years after we see how this change goes. And just for the record I wasn’t proposing that we put vehicles all over the front yard. I was only suggesting that the area between the driveway and the side yard setback next to the driveway could be used to allow somebody to be able to fully use their driveway for what it was intended for cars, and also get their recreational vehicle in a place that they could use it so I will support it but I think it could go further. Weick: Thank you. And to Commissioner Von Oven’s point as with all the comments that have been made tonight. They are part of the record. That record is reviewed by City Council in detail and that point could be one you know that is reviewed and possibly added at the City Council level so thank you for that. Anyone else with comment before we vote? And hearing we’ll do a roll call vote. Von Oven moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendments to Chapter 20, Zoning of the Chanhassen City Code concerning the outdoor storage of boats, trailers and recreational vehicles. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Weick: So the item will move forward to City Council with a unanimous recommendation of 6 in favor, zero against. Again thank you to everybody on the commission, staff, residents who came tonight to voice their opinion as well as those residents who emailed and called in prior to this meeting. That is the most important part of this. This isn’t difficult and I do feel comfortable that we’ve passed something to City Council with good research and good opinion so thank you. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Noyes noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated October 20, 2020. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Weick: And Kate do you have a City Council update? Aanenson: While I’m looking for that I was also going to give you an update on your next coming agenda. We actually have 3 items on the next agenda. We’ve got a rezoning for a piece of property that wants to do a PUD. We have a subdivision. I think we talked about that before. Deer Haven on Yosemite and then the final one is the, this auto repair business at 101 and Lyman Boulevard so it’s a 10 day. Sharmeen Al-Jaff on our staff worked really hard to get really nice architecture on that and so they did resubmit. They asked to be tabled so I think it’s a much better drawing. So City Council update. Here we go. So the Bluff Creek, the Bluffs at Lake Lucy there was a restriction on Saturday work hours so that was modified and then they approved the preliminary and final plat for the Berrospid. That one that you saw. The City Council did approve that. There was some discussion on that. I think a little bit more than Chanhassen Planning Commission – November 17, 2020 18 maybe even so the owner of that property actually does a lot of commercial development so he was very knowledgeable on actually had done to the watershed district. Very knowledgeable on the stormwater containment and that was really the driving… He originally was going to do two lots but the complex water treatment that was done so he’s used to installing those so I think that was a great conversation so that project will be proceeding forward. And so as I mentioned we have 3 items on your agenda then for your last meeting of the year, December 1st and we already have a couple of projects in the queue for January so that’s all I had Chairman. There’s open discussion after close the meeting regarding potential commission vacancies and what to look for in making new commissioners so we’ll discuss that when we close the meeting. Weick: Tonight? Aanenson: Yes. Just for a couple minutes, yep. So if everybody stays online. Weick: I don’t know if you heard that but please stay online but with that I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Von Oven moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020XX: Adopt Final Levy & 2021 Budget and 20212025 CIP Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: H.2. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION Adopt the attached resolution establishing the 2021 final levy of $12,066,700 and approve total General Fund budget of $12,208,200, the enterprise funds operating budget of $6,288,500 and the special revenue funds operating budget of $228,900 and debt service in accordance with existing bond requirements. It also approves the CIP for 20212025 with a 2021 budget total of $38,198,010. The 5year total amount of the CIP is $109,888,425. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On September 28, 2020, the City Council approved the preliminary levy in the amount of $12,066,700.This includes an increase in the total levy of $325,322 or 2.77%. Staff has revised General Fund expenditures and revenue estimates for a net difference of $32,000, redirected savings to funding of a midyear addition of an FTE for an IT position and identified use of fund balance for onetime expenditures for a compensation study and designating an emergency contingency for unfunded paid sick leave due to COVID and other unfunded pandemic related expenses. With these revisions the final levy for approval has been prepared at the same amount as the preliminary levy of $12,066,700. These revisions were discussed at the previous Council TNT hearing on December 7th. The CIP document has been revised from the original proposed for an increase in storm water pond maintenance as discussed during the utility rate study review in November Council work sessions. Other minor changes in proposed projects have been incorporated for updated project information.None of the changes have an impact on the tax levy. The budget revenue estimates reflect the proposed changes to the City's fee schedule. RECOMMENDATION The City Council adopts the attached resolution establishing the 2021 final levy of $12,066,800 and approves operating budgets for the General fund, special revenue funds, enterprise funds, and debt service. It also approves the CIP for 20212025 as presented. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Adopt Final Levy & 2021 Budget and 20212025 CIPSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.2.Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTIONAdopt the attached resolution establishing the 2021 final levy of $12,066,700 and approve total General Fundbudget of $12,208,200, the enterprise funds operating budget of $6,288,500 and the special revenue fundsoperating budget of $228,900 and debt service in accordance with existing bond requirements. It also approves theCIP for 20212025 with a 2021 budget total of $38,198,010. The 5year total amount of the CIP is$109,888,425.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn September 28, 2020, the City Council approved the preliminary levy in the amount of $12,066,700.This includesan increase in the total levy of $325,322 or 2.77%.Staff has revised General Fund expenditures and revenue estimates for a net difference of $32,000, redirected savingsto funding of a midyear addition of an FTE for an IT position and identified use of fund balance for onetimeexpenditures for a compensation study and designating an emergency contingency for unfunded paid sick leave due toCOVID and other unfunded pandemic related expenses. With these revisions the final levy for approval has beenprepared at the same amount as the preliminary levy of $12,066,700. These revisions were discussed at the previousCouncil TNT hearing on December 7th.The CIP document has been revised from the original proposed for an increase in storm water pond maintenance asdiscussed during the utility rate study review in November Council work sessions. Other minor changes in proposedprojects have been incorporated for updated project information.None of the changes have an impact on the tax levy.The budget revenue estimates reflect the proposed changes to the City's fee schedule. RECOMMENDATIONThe City Council adopts the attached resolution establishing the 2021 final levy of $12,066,800 and approves operating budgets for the General fund, special revenue funds, enterprise funds, and debt service. It also approves the CIP for 20212025 as presented. ATTACHMENTS: 2021 Budget Adoption 2021 Budget Resolution 20212025 CIP 2021 General Fund Budget Schedules 2021 Special Revenue Funds Budget Schedules 2021 Enterprise Fund Budget City of Chanhassen2021 BudgetBudget AdoptionDecember 14, 2020 Budget CalendarFeb 10 Council Work Session –Discuss Early 2021 Budget EstimatesJune 8 Council Work Session ‐Discussion of 2020 and 2021 BudgetAug 10 Council Work Session –Initial 2021 Budget DiscussionAug 24 Council Work Session – Detailed Budget DiscussionSept 14 Council Work Session –Max Tax DiscussionSept 28 Council Meeting –Set Preliminary Tax LevyOct 12 Council Work Session –Special Revenue & Enterprise Funds Oct 12 Council Work Session – Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2021‐2025Oct 26 Council Work Session – Review of 2020 Utility Rate StudyNov 9 Council Work Session –Long‐term Financial PlanningNov 23 Council Work Session – Budget Follow‐upDec 7 Council Meeting –Truth In Taxation (TNT) HearingDec 14 Council Meeting –Adopt 2021 Tax Levy, Budget & Fee Schedule Max Levy at 2.77%2020 2021 Dollar PercentLevy Levy Change ChangeGeneral Fund $9,181,833 $9,503,900 322,067 2.74%Capital Replacement Fund (for equipment) 800,000 800,000 Revolving Imp Street Reconstruction 728,523 930,000 Pavement Mgmt Fund (Sealcoating) 93,000 353,000 Total Capital Levies 1,621,523 2,083,000 461,477 3.93%DEBT LEVYPublic Works Facility 480,600 479,800 Library Referendum 457,412 Total Debt Levies 938,012 479,800 (458,212)‐3.90%TOTAL TAX LEVY $11,741,368 $12,066,700 $325,332 2.77% General Fund Expenditures2020 Final Budget2021 Recommended Budget% Change from 2020General Government$2,244,700 $2,463,800 +9.8%Law Enforcement/Fire$3,966,900 $4,034,000 +1.7%Public Works$2,745,000 $2,825,500 +2.9%Community Development$577,800 $597,100 +3.3%Park & Recreation$2,365,300 $2,287,800 -3.3%Total$11,899,700 $12,208,200 +2.6%4 General Fund Revenues2020 Final Budget2021 Recommended Final Budget% Change from 2020Property Tax $9,161,833 $9,476,.000 +3.1%Licenses & Permits $1,128,600 $1,191,600 +5.6%Intergovernmental Rev. $442,000 $410,000‐7.2%Charges for Services $636,900 $518,900‐18.5%Fines & Penalties $116,500 $106,500‐8.6%Other Revenue $413,867 $415,200 +0.3%Total Revenue $11,899,700 $12,118,200 +1.6%Use of Fund Balance‐$90,000Total Sources of Funds $11,899,700 $12,208,200 +1.6%5 What factors change the budget for 2021?• $325,432 Levy Increase 2.77% • IT position mid-year addition $32,000• Use of Fund Balance:• Compensation Study $25,000• Organizational Study $15,000• Emergency Contingency $50,000 Special Revenue FundOperating Budgets2020 Final Budget2021 Recommended Budget% Change from 202010% Charitable Contribution$53,600 $53,800 +0.4%Cemetery$224,300 $228,900 +15.0%Cable TV$168,700 $172,800 +2.4%Total$224,300 $228,900 +2.1%7Note: This operating expenses and does not include capital which is in the CIP. Enterprise FundOperating Budgets2020 Final Budget2021 Recommended Budget% Change from 2020Water Fund$2,101,100 $2,137,900 +1.8%Sewer Fund$2,966,100 $3,393,400 +14.4%Storm Water Management$672,000 $757,200 +12.7%Total$5,739,200 $6,288,500 +9.6%8Note: This operating expenses and does not include capital which is in the CIP. Thank you! CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: December 14, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2021 BUDGET AND CIP, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVIES IN 2020, COLLECTIBLE FOR 2021 WHEREAS, the City Council has examined the budgetary and tax levy needs for Chanhassen for the calendar year 2021 through detailed public budget meetings; and WHEREAS, the Public Budget meeting was held on December 7th 2020, to receive public input into the budget and tax levy for 2021; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen that the 2021 Budget for the City of Chanhassen is adopted with revenue and expenditure amounts for the General Fund of $12,208,200, Special Revenue Funds of $53,800, $2,300, and $172,800 respectively which are detailed in the 2021 Budget which is made part of this motion by reference; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen adopts a total tax levy of $12,066,700 for 2021; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen adopts a tax levy of $800,000 for the purpose of equipment upgrades and purchases for 2021; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chanhassen adopts a debt levy of $479,800 to meet statutory requirements and bond covenants and that the County Auditor is hereby authorized to spread the adopted debt levy as shown on the attached Tax Levy Certification document; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts a Capital Improvement Program for years 2021-2025 in the total amount of $109,888,425. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Chanhassen authorizes the County Auditor to levy the amounts upon taxable property in the City of Chanhassen in 2020 for collection in 2021, as set forth in the Tax Levy Certification document. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 14th day of December, 2020. ATTEST: Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 2020 2021 % Change Operational & Capital Levies General Fund 9,181,833$ 9,503,900$ Capital Replacement 800,000 800,000 Revolving Imp Street Reconstruction 728,523 930,000 MSA (Sealcoating)93,000 353,000 Total Operational & Capital Levies 10,803,356$ 11,586,900$ 7.25% Debt Levies Public Works Facility 480,600 479,800 Library Referendum 457,412 - Total Debt Levies 938,012$ 479,800$ -48.85% Total All Levies 11,741,368$ 12,066,700$ 2.77% 2021 Tax Levy 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate Revenue 3801 Interest Earnings 514 703 - - 0.0%- 3807 Donations 44,952 41,265 40,000 36,000 (10.0%)36,000 3903 Refunds/Reimbursements - - - - 0.0%- *Total Other Revenue 45,466 41,968 40,000 36,000 (10.0%)36,000 **Total Revenue 45,466 41,968 40,000 36,000 (10.0%)36,000 Expenditures 4030 Retirement Contributions 3,504 3,471 3,600 3,800 5.6%4,000 *Total Contractual Services 3,504 3,471 3,600 3,800 5.6%4,000 4370 Travel & Training 48,771 48,564 50,000 50,000 0.0%50,000 *Total Contractual Services 48,771 48,564 50,000 50,000 0.0%50,000 4705 Other Equipment 3,859 2,579 - - 0.0%- *Total Capital Outlay 3,859 2,579 - - 0.0%- **Total Expenditures 56,134 54,613 53,600 53,800 0.4%54,000 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures (10,668) (12,646) (13,600) (17,800) (18,000) SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Special Revenue Funds 201 10% Charitable Contribution 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate Revenue 3670 Internment Fee 750 750 700 700 0.0%700 *Total General Property Tax 750 750 700 700 0.0%700 3801 Interest Earnings 664 1,905 200 500 150.0%500 3804 Land Sale 11,800 8,200 3,000 5,000 66.7%5,000 3807 Donations - 1,000 - - 0.0%- *Total Other Revenue 12,464 11,105 3,200 5,500 71.9%5,500 **Total Revenue 13,214 11,855 3,900 6,200 59.0%6,200 Expenditures 4300 Fees, Services 1,397 2,190 2,000 2,300 15.0%2,500 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal - - - - 0.0%- *Total Contractual Services 1,397 2,190 2,000 2,300 15.0%2,500 **Total Expenditures 1,397 2,190 2,000 2,300 15.0%2,500 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures 11,817 9,664 1,900 3,900 3,700 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Special Revenue Funds 202 Cemetery 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate Revenue 3080 Franchise Fees 230,980 185,181 188,000 185,000 (1.6%)185,000 *Total General Property Tax 230,980 185,181 188,000 185,000 (1.6%)185,000 3801 Interest Earnings 7,647 18,121 3,000 3,000 0.0%3,000 *Total Other Revenue 7,647 18,121 3,000 3,000 0.0%3,000 **Total Revenue 238,627 203,302 191,000 188,000 (1.6%)188,000 Expenditures 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 85,595 86,282 87,600 90,000 2.7%93,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 12,674 12,740 13,500 13,700 1.5%14,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 13,654 15,204 14,500 16,000 10.3%17,000 4050 Workers Compensation 674 535 800 800 0.0%800 *Total Personal Services 112,598 114,760 116,400 120,500 3.5%124,800 4120 Supplies-Equipment - - 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 *Total Materials & Supplies - - 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 4300 Fees, Services 38,001 53,657 30,000 30,000 0.0%40,000 4310 Telephone and Communications - 38 - - 0.0%- 4340 Printing & Publishing - - 500 500 0.0%500 4370 Travel & Training - - 300 300 0.0%300 4483 Liability Insurance 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 0.0%1,500 *Total Contractual Services 39,501 55,194 32,300 32,300 0.0%42,300 4705 Other Equipment - 60,383 15,000 15,000 0.0%20,000 4706 Other Improvements 7,941 - - - 0.0%- *Total Capital Outlay 7,941 60,383 15,000 15,000 0.0%- **Total Expenditures 160,040 230,337 168,700 172,800 2.4%172,100 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures 78,587 (27,036) 22,300 15,200 15,900 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Special Revenue Funds 210 Cable TV 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 3661 Water Usage 2,994,530 2,816,932 3,000,000 2,900,000 (3.3%)3,000,000 3662 Utility Penalties 58,500 61,927 55,000 60,000 9.1%60,000 3664 Sale of Meters & Parts 50,657 39,888 40,000 40,000 0.0%40,000 3666 Bulk Water Sales 5,119 12,917 4,000 6,000 50.0%6,000 3806 Hook Up Fees 2,387,509 1,450,925 1,200,000 1,400,000 16.7%1,400,000 3808 Insurance Reimbursements 248 - - - 0.0%- *Total Current Services 5,496,564 4,382,590 4,299,000 4,406,000 2.5%4,506,000 3801 Interest Earnings 102,906 265,092 50,000 75,000 50.0%75,000 3903 Refunds/Reimbursements 12,237 3,543 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 3980 Cash Short/Over (0) (0) - - 0.0%- *Total Other Revenue 115,143 268,635 55,000 80,000 45.5%80,000 **Total Revenue 5,611,707 4,651,224 4,354,000 4,486,000 3.0%4,586,000 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures 3,686,669 2,726,265 2,252,900 2,348,100 2,425,100 2021 Enterprise Funds 700 Water Utility Revenue 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 548,321 537,181 550,000 548,000 (0.4%)560,000 4011 Overtime-Reg 18,753 26,142 25,000 25,000 0.0%27,000 4012 Stand-By Pay 7,333 7,698 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 23,475 12,591 24,000 24,000 0.0%24,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 29 551 500 500 0.0%500 4030 Contributions-Retirement 80,038 84,644 90,000 90,000 0.0%94,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 111,948 112,065 105,000 116,000 10.5%121,000 4050 Workers Compensation 22,306 17,500 24,000 22,000 (8.3%)22,000 4060 Unemployment 317 - - - 0.0%- *Total Personal Services 812,521 798,372 825,500 832,500 0.8%855,500 4120 Supplies-Equipment 9,213 16,159 17,800 16,100 (9.6%)16,100 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 1,976 4,871 4,000 4,000 0.0%4,000 4150 Maintenance Materials 21,892 30,119 29,000 30,000 3.4%30,000 4160 Chemicals 201,037 113,704 253,000 212,000 (16.2%)212,000 4170 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 15,852 16,611 16,000 16,400 2.5%16,400 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 3,822 6,245 4,000 4,100 2.5%4,100 4250 Merchandise for Resale 126,957 111,309 100,000 125,000 25.0%125,000 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 5,148 5,427 4,000 5,000 25.0%5,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 385,897 304,446 427,800 412,600 (3.6%)412,600 4300 Fees, Services 86,866 78,155 85,500 85,000 (0.6%)85,000 4301 Auditing 7,600 7,200 7,600 7,600 0.0%7,600 4310 Telephone 12,657 14,194 14,900 15,200 2.0%15,200 4320 Utilities 264,356 279,138 325,000 329,500 1.4%329,500 4330 Postage 5,657 7,820 6,000 6,000 0.0%6,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 1,690 1,525 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 1,108 812 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 702 708 800 800 0.0%800 4370 Travel & Training 7,623 7,231 7,500 7,500 0.0%7,500 4410 Rental-Equipment 2,015 1,868 3,000 2,500 (16.7%)2,500 4483 Insurance-General Liability 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 0.0%20,000 4509 Remit to Other Agencies 52,821 66,839 53,000 65,000 22.6%65,000 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 8,807 15,458 13,000 16,000 23.1%16,000 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 52 1,700 500 700 40.0%700 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 72,479 82,945 78,000 46,000 (41.0%)46,000 4550 Repair & Maintenance-Water 135,815 147,303 150,000 198,000 32.0%198,000 4552 Emergency Repairs-Water 46,373 89,246 80,000 90,000 12.5%90,000 *Total Contractual Services 726,620 822,141 847,800 892,800 5.3%892,800 **Total Expenditures 1,925,038 1,924,959 2,101,100 2,137,900 1.8%2,160,900 2021 Enterprise Funds 700 Water Utility Expenditures Summary (Total of 7000, 7019 and 7043) 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 548,321 537,181 550,000 548,000 (0.4%)560,000 4011 Overtime-Reg 18,753 26,142 25,000 25,000 0.0%27,000 4012 Stand-By Pay 7,333 7,698 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 23,475 12,591 24,000 24,000 0.0%24,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 29 551 500 500 0.0%500 4030 Contributions-Retirement 80,038 84,644 90,000 90,000 0.0%94,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 111,948 112,065 105,000 116,000 10.5%121,000 4050 Workers Compensation 22,306 17,500 24,000 22,000 (8.3%)22,000 4060 Unemployment 317 - - - 0.0%- *Total Personal Services 812,521 798,372 825,500 832,500 0.8%855,500 4120 Supplies-Equipment 5,490 6,374 11,000 8,000 (27.3%)8,000 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 1,976 4,871 4,000 4,000 0.0%4,000 4150 Maintenance Materials 11,404 10,768 13,000 13,000 0.0%13,000 4160 Chemicals - 7 1,000 - (100.0%)- 4170 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 15,852 16,611 16,000 16,400 2.5%16,400 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 3,822 6,245 4,000 4,100 2.5%4,100 4250 Merchandise for Resale 126,957 111,309 100,000 125,000 25.0%125,000 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 4,894 5,427 4,000 5,000 25.0%5,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 170,395 161,613 153,000 175,500 14.7%175,500 4300 Fees, Services 84,873 70,639 80,000 85,000 6.3%85,000 4301 Auditing 7,600 7,200 7,600 7,600 0.0%7,600 4310 Telephone 9,301 10,329 9,500 9,800 3.2%9,800 4320 Utilities 154,894 145,510 160,000 160,000 0.0%160,000 4330 Postage 5,657 7,820 6,000 6,000 0.0%6,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 1,690 1,525 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 1,108 812 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 702 708 800 800 0.0%800 4370 Travel & Training 7,623 7,231 7,500 7,500 0.0%7,500 4410 Rental-Equipment 2,015 1,868 3,000 2,500 (16.7%)2,500 4483 Insurance-General Liability 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 0.0%20,000 4509 Remit to Other Agencies 52,821 66,839 53,000 65,000 22.6%65,000 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 1,641 7,228 4,000 4,000 0.0%4,000 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 52 1,700 500 700 40.0%700 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 41,501 49,775 46,000 46,000 0.0%46,000 4550 Repair & Maintenance-Water 124,744 133,468 135,000 140,000 3.7%140,000 4552 Emergency Repairs-Water 46,373 89,246 80,000 90,000 12.5%90,000 *Total Contractual Services 562,594 621,896 615,900 647,900 5.2%647,900 **Total Expenditures 1,545,510 1,581,882 1,594,400 1,655,900 3.9%1,678,900 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 700 Water Utility Expenditures 7000 Administration 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4120 Supplies-Equipment 1,336 6,002 3,800 5,000 31.6%5,000 4150 Maintenance Materials 7,507 11,546 9,000 10,000 11.1%10,000 4160 Chemicals 132,937 70,998 132,000 132,000 0.0%132,000 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 254 - - - 0.0%- *Total Materials & Supplies 142,033 88,546 144,800 147,000 1.5%147,000 4300 Fees, Services 1,993 2,261 2,000 - (100.0%)- 4310 Telephone 2,523 2,523 2,600 2,700 3.8%2,700 4320 Utilities 90,227 57,111 90,000 92,500 2.8%92,500 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 3,815 5,668 4,500 6,000 33.3%6,000 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 27,209 27,547 27,000 - (100.0%)- 4550 Repair & Maintenance-Water 10,047 9,499 10,000 38,000 280.0%38,000 *Total Contractual Services 135,814 104,609 136,100 139,200 2.3%139,200 **Total Expenditures 277,847 193,155 280,900 286,200 1.9%286,200 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 700 Water Utility Expenditures 7019 East Water Treatment Facility 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4120 Supplies-Equipment 2,388 3,783 3,000 3,100 3.3%3,100 4150 Maintenance Materials 2,981 7,805 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 4160 Chemicals 68,100 42,699 120,000 80,000 (33.3%)80,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 73,469 54,287 130,000 90,100 (30.7%)90,100 4300 Fees, Services - 5,255 3,500 - (100.0%)- 4310 Telephone 832 1,342 2,800 2,700 (3.6%)2,700 4320 Utilities 19,235 76,517 75,000 77,000 2.7%77,000 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 3,351 2,562 4,500 6,000 33.3%6,000 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 3,769 5,623 5,000 - (100.0%)- 4550 Repair & Maintenance-Water 1,024 4,337 5,000 20,000 300.0%20,000 *Total Contractual Services 28,212 95,636 95,800 105,700 10.3%105,700 **Total Expenditures 101,681 149,922 225,800 195,800 (13.3%)195,800 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 700 Water Utility Expenditures 7043 West Water Treatment Facility 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 3660 Sewer Customers 2,950,883 3,067,469 3,000,000 3,100,000 3.3%3,200,000 3662 Utility Penalties 57,139 62,614 57,000 60,000 5.3%60,000 3806 Hook Up Fees 742,756 438,417 500,000 500,000 0.0%500,000 3810 SAC Credits Retained - - - - 0.0%- 3811 Sewer Surcharge 25,500 13,875 10,000 10,000 0.0%10,000 3813 Lift Station 32 Development - - - - 0.0%- *Total Current Services 3,776,277 3,582,376 3,567,000 3,670,000 2.9%3,770,000 3801 Interest Earnings 83,552 218,757 40,000 80,000 100.0%80,000 3903 Refunds/Reimbursements 685 324 - - 0.0%- *Total Other Revenue 84,237 219,081 40,000 80,000 100.0%80,000 **Total Revenue 3,860,514 3,801,457 3,607,000 3,750,000 4.0%3,850,000 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures 1,184,504 1,118,326 640,900 356,600 240,300 2021 Enterprise Funds 701 Sewer Utility Revenue 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 330,583 328,514 350,000 350,000 0.0%359,000 4011 Overtime-Reg 10,176 11,515 10,000 10,000 0.0%11,000 4012 Stand-By Pay 7,333 7,698 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 13,284 11,577 14,000 14,000 0.0%14,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 150 390 - - 0.0%- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 47,316 51,306 60,000 58,000 (3.3%)62,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 66,990 69,529 76,700 76,700 0.0%79,000 4050 Workers Compensation 16,544 13,915 17,000 17,000 0.0%17,000 4060 Unemployment 317 - - - 0.0%- *Total Personal Services 492,694 494,444 534,700 532,700 (0.4%)549,000 4120 Supplies-Equipment 5,162 2,832 6,000 6,000 0.0%6,000 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 206 2,150 2,000 2,500 25.0%2,500 4150 Maintenance Materials 13,878 6,703 12,000 14,000 16.7%14,000 4160 Chemicals - - 2,000 - (100.0%)- 4170 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 11,944 10,133 12,000 12,000 0.0%12,000 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 2,614 3,334 2,800 2,800 0.0%2,800 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 3,172 451 4,000 3,000 (25.0%)3,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 36,975 25,604 40,800 40,300 (1.2%)40,300 4300 Fees, Services 56,634 43,841 50,000 50,000 0.0%50,000 4301 Auditing 7,400 7,000 7,400 7,400 0.0%7,400 4310 Telephone 7,149 8,081 7,200 7,400 2.8%7,400 4320 Utilities 87,636 63,186 87,000 87,000 0.0%87,000 4330 Postage 5,214 6,942 5,500 5,600 1.8%5,600 4340 Printing & Publishing 1,489 1,307 1,600 1,600 0.0%1,600 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 668 696 700 700 0.0%700 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 144 150 100 200 100.0%200 4370 Travel & Training 4,035 3,732 4,600 5,000 8.7%5,000 4410 Rental-Equipment 1,765 1,868 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 4483 Insurance-General Liability 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 0.0%20,000 4509 Remit to Other Agencies 1,830,942 1,904,789 2,072,000 2,500,000 20.7%2,700,000 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 3,210 2,049 3,500 3,500 0.0%3,500 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles - 962 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 27,761 23,499 30,000 31,000 3.3%31,000 4551 Repair & Maintenance-Sewer 89,220 67,915 90,000 90,000 0.0%90,000 4553 Emergency Repairs-Sewer 3,075 7,067 8,000 8,000 0.0%8,000 *Total Contractual Services 2,146,341 2,163,084 2,390,600 2,820,400 18.0%3,020,400 **Total Expenditures 2,676,010 2,683,132 2,966,100 3,393,400 14.4%3,609,700 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 701 Sewer Utility Expenditures 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 3328 Wetland Alteration 1,134 275 - - 0.0%- *Total Permits 1,134 275 - - 0.0%- 3510 Grants-State 6,418 177,572 - - 0.0%- 3520 Grants-County 5,382 11,645 3,000 3,000 0.0%3,000 3533 Grants-Other 32,804 65,000 33,000 35,000 6.1%35,000 *Total Intergovernmental Rev 44,604 254,217 36,000 38,000 5.6%38,000 3640 Community Garden Plot Rental 2,000 1,975 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 3650 Sale of Recyclables 96 272 300 300 0.0%300 3651 Merchandise Sales 14 - - - 0.0%- 3652 Yard Waste Collection Fees - 3,177 - - 0.0%- 3660 Sewer Customers 748,348 975,408 750,000 1,130,000 50.7%1,200,000 3662 Utility Penalties 12,907 17,663 14,000 15,000 7.1%15,000 3806 Connection Charges 172,844 758,823 150,000 200,000 33.3%200,000 *Total Current Services 936,209 1,757,318 916,300 1,347,300 47.0%1,417,300 3801 Interest Earnings 20,438 48,740 10,000 20,000 100.0%20,000 3807 Donations 270 - - - 0.0%- 3903 Refunds and Reimbursements 161 62 - - 0.0%- *Total Other Revenue 20,869 48,802 10,000 20,000 100.0%20,000 **Total Revenue 1,002,816 2,060,612 962,300 1,405,300 46.0%1,475,300 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures 406,272 1,472,689 290,300 648,100 700,100 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Revenue Summary (Total of 7200, 7201, 7202 and 7205) 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 236,555 198,835 255,000 276,000 8.2%285,400 4011 Overtime-Reg 12 4,414 - 4,000 100.0%4,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 16,308 4,292 15,000 15,000 0.0%15,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 10 - - - 0.0%- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 32,171 28,976 38,200 41,600 8.9%45,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 48,494 37,640 53,800 52,800 (1.9%)58,000 4050 Workers Compensation 1,641 1,048 1,400 1,700 21.4%1,700 4060 Unemployment - 9,221 - - 0.0%- *Total Personal Services 335,190 284,425 363,400 391,100 7.6%409,100 4120 Supplies-Equipment 1,152 561 1,200 1,000 (16.7%)1,000 4130 Supplies-Program 38,250 23,789 49,700 39,700 (20.1%)39,700 4150 Maintenance Materials - 3,199 12,000 16,000 33.3%16,000 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 31 64 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Materials & Supplies 39,433 27,613 63,000 56,800 (9.8%)56,800 4300 Fees, Services 198,632 252,895 220,500 251,000 13.8%251,000 4301 Auditing 4,800 4,600 4,800 4,800 0.0%4,800 4310 Telephone and Communications 1,966 1,410 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 4320 Utilities/Community Garden 737 2,691 1,000 1,500 50.0%1,500 4340 Printing & Publishing 1,994 1,547 2,600 3,000 15.4%3,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 1,995 1,396 1,900 2,500 31.6%2,500 4370 Travel & Training 2,800 2,298 3,400 3,500 2.9%3,500 4380 Mileage - - 300 500 66.7%500 4410 Equipment Rental 882 934 1,000 11,200 1020.0%11,200 4483 Insurance-General Liability 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 0.0%7,500 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 614 614 600 800 33.3%800 4570 Repair & Maintenance-Storm Water - - - 21,000 100.0%21,000 *Total Contractual Services 221,921 275,885 245,600 309,300 25.9%309,300 **Total Expenditures 596,545 587,923 672,000 757,200 12.7%775,200 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Expenditures Summary (Total of 7200, 7201, 7202 and 7205) 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 3328 Wetland Alteration 1,134 275 - - 0.0%- *Total Permits 1,134 275 - - 0.0%- 3510 Grants-State - 177,572 - - 0.0%- 3520 Grants-County - - - 0.0%- 3533 Grants-Other - 30,000 - 0.0%- *Total Intergovernmental Rev - 207,572 - - 0.0%- 3651 Merchandise Sales 14 - - - 0.0%- 3660 Sewer Customers 748,348 975,408 750,000 1,130,000 50.7%1,200,000 3662 Utility Penalties 12,907 17,663 14,000 15,000 7.1%15,000 3806 Connection Charges 172,844 758,823 150,000 200,000 33.3%200,000 *Total Current Services 934,113 1,751,894 914,000 1,345,000 47.2%1,415,000 3801 Interest Earnings 20,438 48,740 10,000 20,000 100.0%20,000 3903 Refunds and Reimbursements 161 62 - - 0.0%- *Total Other Revenue 20,599 48,802 10,000 20,000 100.0%20,000 **Total Revenue 955,846 2,008,543 924,000 1,365,000 47.7%1,435,000 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures 574,976 1,652,726 471,400 903,500 958,900 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Revenue 7200 Administration 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 183,076 143,400 200,000 219,400 9.7%227,000 4011 Overtime-Reg 12 4 - - 0.0%- 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 16,308 4,292 15,000 15,000 0.0%15,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 10 - - - 0.0%- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 25,077 21,676 30,000 33,000 10.0%36,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 30,331 18,288 37,000 34,000 (8.1%)38,000 4050 Workers Compensation 1,314 789 1,000 1,300 30.0%1,300 4060 Unemployment - 9,221 - - 0.0%- *Total Personal Services 256,128 197,671 283,000 302,700 7.0%317,300 4120 Supplies-Equipment 1,152 561 1,200 1,000 (16.7%)1,000 4130 Supplies-Program 29,742 16,525 40,000 30,000 (25.0%)30,000 4150 Maintenance Materials - 3,199 12,000 6,000 (50.0%)6,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 30,894 20,285 53,200 37,000 (30.5%)37,000 4300 Fees, Services 73,690 120,108 96,000 100,000 4.2%100,000 4301 Auditing 4,800 4,600 4,800 4,800 0.0%4,800 4310 Telephone and Communications 1,966 1,410 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 363 - 100 500 400.0%500 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 1,593 994 1,600 2,000 25.0%2,000 4370 Travel & Training 2,440 1,700 2,500 2,500 0.0%2,500 4380 Mileage - - 300 500 66.7%500 4410 Equipment Rental 882 934 1,000 1,200 20.0%1,200 4483 Insurance-General Liability 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 0.0%7,500 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 614 614 600 800 33.3%800 *Total Contractual Services 93,850 137,861 116,400 121,800 4.6%121,800 **Total Expenditures 380,871 355,817 452,600 461,500 2.0%476,100 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Expenditures 7200 Administration 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 3520 Grants-County 5,382 10,682 3,000 3,000 0.0%3,000 *Total Intergovernmental Rev 5,382 10,682 3,000 3,000 0.0%3,000 3650 Sale of Recyclables 96 272 300 300 0.0%300 3652 Yard Waste Collection Fees - 3,177 - - 0.0%- *Total Current Services 96 3,449 300 300 0.0%300 **Total Revenue 5,478 14,131 3,300 3,300 0.0%3,300 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures (40,690) (45,081) (44,500) (55,700) (57,400) 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Revenue 7201 Recycling 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 26,739 27,717 27,500 28,300 2.9%29,200 4011 Overtime-Reg - 4,409 - 4,000 100.0%4,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 3,547 3,650 4,100 4,300 4.9%4,500 4040 Contributions-Insurance 9,081 9,676 8,400 9,400 11.9%10,000 4050 Workers Compensation 164 129 200 200 0.0%200 *Total Personal Services 39,531 45,582 40,200 46,200 14.9%47,900 4130 Supplies-Program 2,698 316 2,700 2,700 0.0%2,700 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 31 64 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Materials & Supplies 2,729 380 2,800 2,800 0.0%2,800 4300 Fees, Services 2,155 11,488 3,000 8,000 166.7%8,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 1,453 1,284 1,500 1,500 0.0%1,500 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 300 300 200 300 50.0%300 4370 Travel & Training - 178 100 200 100.0%200 *Total Contractual Services 3,908 13,250 4,800 10,000 108.3%10,000 **Total Expenditures 46,168 59,212 47,800 59,000 23.4%60,700 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Expenditures 7201 Recycling 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 3510 Grants-State 6,418 - - - 0.0%- 3520 Grants-County - 963 - - 0.0%- *Total Intergovernmental Rev 6,418 963 - - 0.0%- 3640 Community Garden Plot Rental 2,000 1,975 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 *Total Current Services 2,000 1,975 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 3807 Donations 270 - - - 0.0%- *Total Other Revenue 270 - - - 0.0%- **Total Revenue 8,688 2,938 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures (114,514) (113,965) (118,100) (130,700) (132,400) 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Revenue 7202 Forestry Management 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 26,739 27,717 27,500 28,300 2.9%29,200 4030 Contributions-Retirement 3,546 3,650 4,100 4,300 4.9%4,500 4040 Contributions-Insurance 9,082 9,676 8,400 9,400 11.9%10,000 4050 Workers Compensation 164 129 200 200 0.0%200 *Total Personal Services 39,532 41,172 40,200 42,200 5.0%43,900 4130 Supplies-Program 5,810 6,947 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 5,810 6,947 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 4300 Fees, Services 76,483 65,308 70,000 80,000 14.3%80,000 4320 Utilities/Community Garden 737 2,691 1,000 1,500 50.0%1,500 4340 Printing & Publishing 178 263 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 102 102 100 200 100.0%200 4370 Travel & Training 360 420 800 800 0.0%800 *Total Contractual Services 77,860 68,783 72,900 83,500 14.5%83,500 **Total Expenditures 123,202 116,903 120,100 132,700 10.5%134,400 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Expenditures 7202 Forestry Management 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 3533 Grants-Other (Carver County)- - - - 0.0%- 3533 Grants-Other (Riley/Purgatory)25,000 25,000 23,000 25,000 8.7%25,000 3533 Grants-Other (Lotus Lk Home)7,804 10,000 10,000 10,000 0.0%10,000 *Total Intergovernmental Rev 32,804 35,000 33,000 35,000 6.1%35,000 **Total Revenue 32,804 35,000 33,000 35,000 6.1%35,000 Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures (13,500) (20,991) (18,500) (28,000) (28,000) 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Revenue 7205 Aquatic Species Mgmt Program 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4300 Fees, Services 46,304 55,991 51,500 63,000 22.3%63,000 *Total Contractual Services 46,304 55,991 51,500 63,000 22.3%63,000 **Total Expenditures 46,304 55,991 51,500 63,000 22.3%63,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Expenditures 7205 Aquatic Species Mgmt Program 2020 to 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4150 Maintenance Materials - - - 10,000 100.0%10,000 *Total Materials & Supplies - - - 10,000 100.0%10,000 4370 Travel & Training - - - - 0.0%- 4410 Rental-Equipment - - - 10,000 100.0%10,000 4570 Repair & Maintenance-Storm Water - - - 21,000 100.0%21,000 *Total Contractual Services - - - 31,000 100.0%31,000 **Total Expenditures - - - 41,000 100.0%41,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2021 2022 2021 Enterprise Funds 720 Surface Water Management Expenditures 7207 Maintenance CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Ordinance XXX: Amendment to City Code Chapter 4, Fees Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: H.3. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts an Ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for 2021." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND City fees are designed to cover the cost of providing a specific service. The City's 2021 budget has been prepared based on the rate changes to be approved. Any reduction to these proposed changes would result in a change in the 2021 proposed budget. DISCUSSION Zoning Permits A new zoning permit fee is proposed. The city currently issues zoning permits for structures that are exempted from the state's building permit requirements that have the potential to violate the city's zoning code. Generally, the city has relied on the individual to selfregulate their structures and to comply with their permit. Staff, as part of the budget presentation, has proposed adding a parttime staff intern to inspect these structures to verify compliance with the permit and city code and is recommending that we institute a zoning permit fee to recoup the costs. The proposed new fee would be $50.00. Amend Section 430 (a). 8. Zoning Permit Fee ….. $50.00 Technology Fee A new technology fee is proposed. The city has been upgrading its computer software and system to provide online permitting options as well as increased internal efficiencies in permit review and information sharing. To help offset these costs, staff is proposing a 0.07 percent technology fee to be added to all permits, calculated on the permit valuation. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectOrdinance XXX: Amendment to City Code Chapter 4, FeesSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.3.Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts an Ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for2021."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDCity fees are designed to cover the cost of providing a specific service. The City's 2021 budget has been preparedbased on the rate changes to be approved. Any reduction to these proposed changes would result in a change in the2021 proposed budget.DISCUSSIONZoning PermitsA new zoning permit fee is proposed. The city currently issues zoning permits for structures that are exempted fromthe state's building permit requirements that have the potential to violate the city's zoning code.Generally, the city has relied on the individual to selfregulate their structures and to comply with their permit. Staff, aspart of the budget presentation, has proposed adding a parttime staff intern to inspect these structures to verifycompliance with the permit and city code and is recommending that we institute a zoning permit fee to recoup thecosts. The proposed new fee would be $50.00.Amend Section 430 (a).8. Zoning Permit Fee ….. $50.00 Technology FeeA new technology fee is proposed. The city has been upgrading its computer software and system to provide onlinepermitting options as well as increased internal efficiencies in permit review and information sharing. To help offset these costs, staff is proposing a 0.07 percent technology fee to be added to all permits, calculated on the permit valuation. Staff undertook an analysis to determine what rate would provide a consistent fee even during low permit valuation years. The years analyzed were 2016 2019. Staff analyzed rates of 0.0625, 0.07 and 0.08 percent. The 0.07 percent rate provided a minimum of $50,000 during these years. Amend Section 430 (a). 9. Technology Fee ….. 0.07 percent of permit valuation, on all permit types The following are changes to existing fees. The 2020 fees are shown in comparison as redlined amounts in the narrative or in the tables below. Surface Water Management (Development) Fees The City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) was first adopted in February of 1994. It was last amended in December of 2018. Based upon recommendations in that plan the City established surface water development fees as a means of financing citywide improvements recommended in the plan’s implementation section. The initial fee was based upon the cost of the recommended pipes and ponds in the 1994 plan. The fees were apportioned according to acreage and intensity of land use and intended to be a more equitable distribution of the cost associated with storm water runoff. This did not consider longterm maintenance of the facilities or increased regulatory requirements. Since the original LSWMP was adopted, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (NPDES MS4) permit was issued and revised multiple times. This permit allows the City to operate its storm sewer system. Our local Watershed Districts have also implemented Rules and Standards the City must meet. This has resulted in increased surface water management requirements. The city continues to look at the significant life cycle costs of maintaining our existing infrastructure as well as the cost of repairing damage caused by runoff in the past. Chanhassen has been replacing/repairing storm sewer infrastructure with every road reconstruction project. The amount of infrastructure has increased substantially over what the City had in 1994 and this amount continues to grow with each new development. As part of the 2021 Rate Study prepared by Ehlers & Associates, the city’s financial advisor, a two percent (2.0%) increase to the surface water management development fees is proposed. Amend Section 430 (c) 3. Surface water management (development )fees: Development Type Per Acre Fee Parks/Open Space $4,820 4,920 SingleFamily Residential $8,490 8,660 Medium Density Residential $10,190 10,390 Townhouse/Apartment Complex/High Density Residential $15,250 15,560 Industrial $22,010 22,450 Commercial $32,160 32,800 Fees are based on the developable land. Undeveloped areas such as wetlands and buffers placed into an outlot, public parks, and public rightofway are exempt from these fees. Sewer and Water Fees A lateral connection charge replaces a missed assessment. When the city installs a pipe next to a property, some owners choose not to connect. In some instances, the city may not have assessed the property owner for their portion Sanitary sewer $1,611.00/unit, or $2,302.00/unit if a portion of the sewer hookup fee was not paid at the time of final subdivision approval—(Lake Ann Interceptor $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)* Water $5,582 5,777.00/unit, or $7,974 8,253.00 if a portion of the water hookup fee was not paid at the time of final subdivision approval SAC As established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surcharge CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectOrdinance XXX: Amendment to City Code Chapter 4, FeesSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.3.Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts an Ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for2021."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDCity fees are designed to cover the cost of providing a specific service. The City's 2021 budget has been preparedbased on the rate changes to be approved. Any reduction to these proposed changes would result in a change in the2021 proposed budget.DISCUSSIONZoning PermitsA new zoning permit fee is proposed. The city currently issues zoning permits for structures that are exempted fromthe state's building permit requirements that have the potential to violate the city's zoning code.Generally, the city has relied on the individual to selfregulate their structures and to comply with their permit. Staff, aspart of the budget presentation, has proposed adding a parttime staff intern to inspect these structures to verifycompliance with the permit and city code and is recommending that we institute a zoning permit fee to recoup thecosts. The proposed new fee would be $50.00.Amend Section 430 (a).8. Zoning Permit Fee ….. $50.00 Technology FeeA new technology fee is proposed. The city has been upgrading its computer software and system to provide onlinepermitting options as well as increased internal efficiencies in permit review and information sharing. To help offsetthese costs, staff is proposing a 0.07 percent technology fee to be added to all permits, calculated on the permitvaluation.Staff undertook an analysis to determine what rate would provide a consistent fee even during low permit valuationyears. The years analyzed were 2016 2019. Staff analyzed rates of 0.0625, 0.07 and 0.08 percent. The 0.07percent rate provided a minimum of $50,000 during these years.Amend Section 430 (a).9. Technology Fee ….. 0.07 percent of permit valuation, on all permit typesThe following are changes to existing fees. The 2020 fees are shown in comparison as redlined amounts in thenarrative or in the tables below.Surface Water Management (Development) FeesThe City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) was first adopted in February of 1994. It was lastamended in December of 2018. Based upon recommendations in that plan the City established surfacewater development fees as a means of financing citywide improvements recommended in the plan’s implementationsection. The initial fee was based upon the cost of the recommended pipes and ponds in the 1994 plan. The fees wereapportioned according to acreage and intensity of land use and intended to be a more equitable distribution of the costassociated with storm water runoff. This did not consider longterm maintenance of the facilities or increasedregulatory requirements.Since the original LSWMP was adopted, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Municipal SeparateStorm Sewer System (NPDES MS4) permit was issued and revised multiple times. This permit allows the City tooperate its storm sewer system. Our local Watershed Districts have also implemented Rules and Standards the Citymust meet. This has resulted in increased surface water management requirements.The city continues to look at the significant life cycle costs of maintaining our existing infrastructure as well as the costof repairing damage caused by runoff in the past. Chanhassen has been replacing/repairing storm sewer infrastructurewith every road reconstruction project. The amount of infrastructure has increased substantially over what the Cityhad in 1994 and this amount continues to grow with each new development.As part of the 2021 Rate Study prepared by Ehlers & Associates, the city’s financial advisor, a two percent (2.0%)increase to the surface water management development fees is proposed.Amend Section 430 (c) 3.Surface water management (development )fees:Development Type Per Acre FeeParks/Open Space $4,820 4,920SingleFamily Residential $8,490 8,660Medium Density Residential $10,190 10,390Townhouse/Apartment Complex/High Density Residential $15,250 15,560Industrial$22,010 22,450Commercial$32,160 32,800Fees are based on the developable land. Undeveloped areas such as wetlands and buffers placed into an outlot,public parks, and public rightofway are exempt from these fees.Sewer and Water Fees A lateral connection charge replaces a missed assessment. When the city installs a pipe next to a property, some owners choose not to connect. In some instances, the city may not have assessed the property owner for their portion of the pipe. When those properties eventually connect, the lateral connection charge approximately covers the cost of the omitted assessment. These charges are only levied in rare instances. Trunk hookup charges, on the other hand, are for core utility infrastructure such as wells, lift stations, and trunk main oversizing. Every new lot in the city that hooks up to the utility system pays a trunk hookup charge. Hookup fees paid at the time of final residential subdivision approval remain the same for sewer at $691.00/unit and increase for water from $2,392.00 to $2,476.00/unit. The remainder of the sewer and water hookup fee is collected with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. The total sanitary hookup fee remains the same at $2,302.00 and the total water hookup fee is increasing from $7,974.00 to $8,253.00. Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will also be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewer trunk hookup fees. The Lake Ann Interceptor hookup fee remains at $1,971.00 and the subtrunk fee remains at $2,068.00. Commercial, industrial and institutional developments pay the total hookup fee at the time of building permit. Trunk hookup fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge (SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council for office or industrial/commercial buildings. Lateral connection charges are charges for utility infrastructure which has been constructed by the city but were not assessed to or paid for a property. Sewer lateral connection charges remain the same at $7,710.00 and water lateral connection charges increase from $9,841.00 to $10,185.00. 2017 2018 2019 2020 Proposed 2021 Water Hookup $7,157 $7,443 $7,704 $7,974 $8,253 Sewer Hookup $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 Water Connection $8,833 $9,186 $9,508 $9,841 $10,185 Sewer Connection $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 Lake Ann Interceptor $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 Subtrunk $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 The Met Council SAC fee for 2021 remains the same as 2020 at $2,485.00. Amend Section 430 (c) 5. Sewer and water fees. Residential development: Shall pay a portion of the sewer and water hookup fees (area trunk fees) at the time of final subdivision approval: $691.00/unit (sewer) and $2,392 2,476.00/unit (water). The remainder of the sewer and water hookup fees shall be collected with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. Parcels previously assessed trunk hookup fees are exempt. Residential trunk hookup fees are based per unit. *Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewer trunk hookup fees. Commercial, industrial and institutional development: Sanitarysewer $1,611.00/unit, or $2,302.00/unit if a portion of the sewer hookup fee was not paid at the time of finalsubdivision approval—(Lake Ann Interceptor $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)*Water $5,582 5,777.00/unit, or $7,974 8,253.00 if a portion of the water hookup fee was not paid at the time offinal subdivision approvalSACAs established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surcharge Sanitary sewer $2,302.00/unit—(Lake Ann Interceptor $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)* Water $7,974 8,253.00/unit SAC As established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surcharge CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectOrdinance XXX: Amendment to City Code Chapter 4, FeesSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.3.Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts an Ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for2021."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDCity fees are designed to cover the cost of providing a specific service. The City's 2021 budget has been preparedbased on the rate changes to be approved. Any reduction to these proposed changes would result in a change in the2021 proposed budget.DISCUSSIONZoning PermitsA new zoning permit fee is proposed. The city currently issues zoning permits for structures that are exempted fromthe state's building permit requirements that have the potential to violate the city's zoning code.Generally, the city has relied on the individual to selfregulate their structures and to comply with their permit. Staff, aspart of the budget presentation, has proposed adding a parttime staff intern to inspect these structures to verifycompliance with the permit and city code and is recommending that we institute a zoning permit fee to recoup thecosts. The proposed new fee would be $50.00.Amend Section 430 (a).8. Zoning Permit Fee ….. $50.00 Technology FeeA new technology fee is proposed. The city has been upgrading its computer software and system to provide onlinepermitting options as well as increased internal efficiencies in permit review and information sharing. To help offsetthese costs, staff is proposing a 0.07 percent technology fee to be added to all permits, calculated on the permitvaluation.Staff undertook an analysis to determine what rate would provide a consistent fee even during low permit valuationyears. The years analyzed were 2016 2019. Staff analyzed rates of 0.0625, 0.07 and 0.08 percent. The 0.07percent rate provided a minimum of $50,000 during these years.Amend Section 430 (a).9. Technology Fee ….. 0.07 percent of permit valuation, on all permit typesThe following are changes to existing fees. The 2020 fees are shown in comparison as redlined amounts in thenarrative or in the tables below.Surface Water Management (Development) FeesThe City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) was first adopted in February of 1994. It was lastamended in December of 2018. Based upon recommendations in that plan the City established surfacewater development fees as a means of financing citywide improvements recommended in the plan’s implementationsection. The initial fee was based upon the cost of the recommended pipes and ponds in the 1994 plan. The fees wereapportioned according to acreage and intensity of land use and intended to be a more equitable distribution of the costassociated with storm water runoff. This did not consider longterm maintenance of the facilities or increasedregulatory requirements.Since the original LSWMP was adopted, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Municipal SeparateStorm Sewer System (NPDES MS4) permit was issued and revised multiple times. This permit allows the City tooperate its storm sewer system. Our local Watershed Districts have also implemented Rules and Standards the Citymust meet. This has resulted in increased surface water management requirements.The city continues to look at the significant life cycle costs of maintaining our existing infrastructure as well as the costof repairing damage caused by runoff in the past. Chanhassen has been replacing/repairing storm sewer infrastructurewith every road reconstruction project. The amount of infrastructure has increased substantially over what the Cityhad in 1994 and this amount continues to grow with each new development.As part of the 2021 Rate Study prepared by Ehlers & Associates, the city’s financial advisor, a two percent (2.0%)increase to the surface water management development fees is proposed.Amend Section 430 (c) 3.Surface water management (development )fees:Development Type Per Acre FeeParks/Open Space $4,820 4,920SingleFamily Residential $8,490 8,660Medium Density Residential $10,190 10,390Townhouse/Apartment Complex/High Density Residential $15,250 15,560Industrial$22,010 22,450Commercial$32,160 32,800Fees are based on the developable land. Undeveloped areas such as wetlands and buffers placed into an outlot,public parks, and public rightofway are exempt from these fees.Sewer and Water FeesA lateral connection charge replaces a missed assessment. When the city installs a pipe next to a property, someowners choose not to connect. In some instances, the city may not have assessed the property owner for their portionof the pipe. When those properties eventually connect, the lateral connection charge approximately covers the cost ofthe omitted assessment. These charges are only levied in rare instances. Trunk hookup charges, on the other hand,are for core utility infrastructure such as wells, lift stations, and trunk main oversizing. Every new lot in the city thathooks up to the utility system pays a trunk hookup charge.Hookup fees paid at the time of final residential subdivision approval remain the same for sewer at $691.00/unit andincrease for water from $2,392.00 to $2,476.00/unit. The remainder of the sewer and water hookup fee is collectedwith the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. The total sanitary hookup fee remains the same at $2,302.00and the total water hookup fee is increasing from $7,974.00 to $8,253.00. Parcels within the Lake Ann SewerDistrict will also be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewer trunk hookup fees. The LakeAnn Interceptor hookup fee remains at $1,971.00 and the subtrunk fee remains at $2,068.00. Commercial,industrial and institutional developments pay the total hookup fee at the time of building permit. Trunk hookup feesare based on the number of sanitary access charge (SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council for office orindustrial/commercial buildings.Lateral connection charges are charges for utility infrastructure which has been constructed by the city but were notassessed to or paid for a property. Sewer lateral connection charges remain the same at $7,710.00 and water lateralconnection charges increase from $9,841.00 to $10,185.00.2017 2018 2019 2020 Proposed2021Water Hookup $7,157 $7,443 $7,704 $7,974 $8,253Sewer Hookup $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 $2,302Water Connection $8,833 $9,186 $9,508 $9,841 $10,185Sewer Connection $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 $7,710Lake AnnInterceptor $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 $1,971Subtrunk $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 $2,068The Met Council SAC fee for 2021 remains the same as 2020 at $2,485.00.Amend Section 430 (c) 5.Sewer and water fees.Residential development:Shall pay a portion of the sewer and water hookup fees (area trunk fees) at the time of final subdivision approval: $691.00/unit (sewer) and $2,392 2,476.00/unit (water). The remainder of the sewer and water hookup fees shall becollected with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time.Parcels previously assessed trunk hookup fees are exempt. Residential trunk hookup fees are based per unit.*Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewertrunk hookup fees. Commercial, industrial and institutional development: Sewer and water trunk hookup fees (area trunk fees). Fee is paid at the time of building permit. Parcels previously assessed trunk hookup fees are exempt. Trunk hookup fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge (SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council for office or industrial/commercial buildings. *Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewer trunk hookup fees. All development: Lateral connection charges: If the lot or tract of land, or portion thereof, to be served by a lateral connection that has not been assessed for the cost of construction, then the applicant shall pay the following lateral connection: Sewer lateral connection charge $7,710.00 Water lateral connection charge $9,841 10,185.00 GIS Fees The capabilities of GIS and our advanced use of the system has increased dramatically since the last time this fee was adjusted. The GIS fee accounts for more than just incorporating parcel lines, which is actually done at the County level. We incorporate all of the public utilities, stormwater BMP's, lighting, signage, streets, walks and trails. Amend Section 430 (c) 7. 7. G.I.S fees $25.00100.00/plat, $10.0030.00/parcel, and $5.00 surcharge if the plat does not contain at least two section corners or quarters and the length and bearing between them. Water and Sewage Rates For 2021, the Ehlers and Associates analysis recommends an increase to the water utility rates for all tiers and the bulk rate. The goals of this year's rate study were to increase water revenues by 5% to keep pace with the needs of the Water Fund and to derive more revenue from indoor water use to become less dependent on irrigation consumption. To achieve these goals, we are recommending changes to the water rate structure primarily expanding the base usage tier and proposing more consistent residential tier breaks. The 2021 rate structure increases the gallons allowed in tiers 2 and 3. In addition it provides for larger tiers for the commercial and industrial customers. This will assist small businesses by helping to reduce their utility bill. Usage tiers have been adjusted slightly from the utility rate study to correct rounding on conversion from quarterly to the optional month billing. The utility rate analysis also recommends a 5.35% increase to the sewer utility rates. Listed below is the 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and proposed 2021 water consumption rate structure along with the sewer rate structure: Water 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fixed Charge (minimum per quarter)8.88 12.99 13.65 14.34 15.06 0 – 6,000 Gallons 1.22 1.22 1.28 1.34 6,001 – 24,000 Gallons 2.45 2.45 2.57 2.70 24,001 – 48,000 Gallons 3.06 3.21 3.37 3.54 48,001 – 99,000 Gallons 3.56 3.74 3.93 4.13 Sanitarysewer $1,611.00/unit, or $2,302.00/unit if a portion of the sewer hookup fee was not paid at the time of finalsubdivision approval—(Lake Ann Interceptor $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)*Water $5,582 5,777.00/unit, or $7,974 8,253.00 if a portion of the water hookup fee was not paid at the time offinal subdivision approvalSACAs established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surchargeSanitary sewer $2,302.00/unit—(Lake Ann Interceptor $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)*Water $7,974 8,253.00/unitSACAs established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surchargeCITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectOrdinance XXX: Amendment to City Code Chapter 4, FeesSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.3.Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts an Ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for2021."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDCity fees are designed to cover the cost of providing a specific service. The City's 2021 budget has been preparedbased on the rate changes to be approved. Any reduction to these proposed changes would result in a change in the2021 proposed budget.DISCUSSIONZoning PermitsA new zoning permit fee is proposed. The city currently issues zoning permits for structures that are exempted fromthe state's building permit requirements that have the potential to violate the city's zoning code.Generally, the city has relied on the individual to selfregulate their structures and to comply with their permit. Staff, aspart of the budget presentation, has proposed adding a parttime staff intern to inspect these structures to verifycompliance with the permit and city code and is recommending that we institute a zoning permit fee to recoup thecosts. The proposed new fee would be $50.00.Amend Section 430 (a).8. Zoning Permit Fee ….. $50.00 Technology FeeA new technology fee is proposed. The city has been upgrading its computer software and system to provide onlinepermitting options as well as increased internal efficiencies in permit review and information sharing. To help offsetthese costs, staff is proposing a 0.07 percent technology fee to be added to all permits, calculated on the permitvaluation.Staff undertook an analysis to determine what rate would provide a consistent fee even during low permit valuationyears. The years analyzed were 2016 2019. Staff analyzed rates of 0.0625, 0.07 and 0.08 percent. The 0.07percent rate provided a minimum of $50,000 during these years.Amend Section 430 (a).9. Technology Fee ….. 0.07 percent of permit valuation, on all permit typesThe following are changes to existing fees. The 2020 fees are shown in comparison as redlined amounts in thenarrative or in the tables below.Surface Water Management (Development) FeesThe City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) was first adopted in February of 1994. It was lastamended in December of 2018. Based upon recommendations in that plan the City established surfacewater development fees as a means of financing citywide improvements recommended in the plan’s implementationsection. The initial fee was based upon the cost of the recommended pipes and ponds in the 1994 plan. The fees wereapportioned according to acreage and intensity of land use and intended to be a more equitable distribution of the costassociated with storm water runoff. This did not consider longterm maintenance of the facilities or increasedregulatory requirements.Since the original LSWMP was adopted, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Municipal SeparateStorm Sewer System (NPDES MS4) permit was issued and revised multiple times. This permit allows the City tooperate its storm sewer system. Our local Watershed Districts have also implemented Rules and Standards the Citymust meet. This has resulted in increased surface water management requirements.The city continues to look at the significant life cycle costs of maintaining our existing infrastructure as well as the costof repairing damage caused by runoff in the past. Chanhassen has been replacing/repairing storm sewer infrastructurewith every road reconstruction project. The amount of infrastructure has increased substantially over what the Cityhad in 1994 and this amount continues to grow with each new development.As part of the 2021 Rate Study prepared by Ehlers & Associates, the city’s financial advisor, a two percent (2.0%)increase to the surface water management development fees is proposed.Amend Section 430 (c) 3.Surface water management (development )fees:Development Type Per Acre FeeParks/Open Space $4,820 4,920SingleFamily Residential $8,490 8,660Medium Density Residential $10,190 10,390Townhouse/Apartment Complex/High Density Residential $15,250 15,560Industrial$22,010 22,450Commercial$32,160 32,800Fees are based on the developable land. Undeveloped areas such as wetlands and buffers placed into an outlot,public parks, and public rightofway are exempt from these fees.Sewer and Water FeesA lateral connection charge replaces a missed assessment. When the city installs a pipe next to a property, someowners choose not to connect. In some instances, the city may not have assessed the property owner for their portionof the pipe. When those properties eventually connect, the lateral connection charge approximately covers the cost ofthe omitted assessment. These charges are only levied in rare instances. Trunk hookup charges, on the other hand,are for core utility infrastructure such as wells, lift stations, and trunk main oversizing. Every new lot in the city thathooks up to the utility system pays a trunk hookup charge.Hookup fees paid at the time of final residential subdivision approval remain the same for sewer at $691.00/unit andincrease for water from $2,392.00 to $2,476.00/unit. The remainder of the sewer and water hookup fee is collectedwith the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. The total sanitary hookup fee remains the same at $2,302.00and the total water hookup fee is increasing from $7,974.00 to $8,253.00. Parcels within the Lake Ann SewerDistrict will also be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewer trunk hookup fees. The LakeAnn Interceptor hookup fee remains at $1,971.00 and the subtrunk fee remains at $2,068.00. Commercial,industrial and institutional developments pay the total hookup fee at the time of building permit. Trunk hookup feesare based on the number of sanitary access charge (SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council for office orindustrial/commercial buildings.Lateral connection charges are charges for utility infrastructure which has been constructed by the city but were notassessed to or paid for a property. Sewer lateral connection charges remain the same at $7,710.00 and water lateralconnection charges increase from $9,841.00 to $10,185.00.2017 2018 2019 2020 Proposed2021Water Hookup $7,157 $7,443 $7,704 $7,974 $8,253Sewer Hookup $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 $2,302Water Connection $8,833 $9,186 $9,508 $9,841 $10,185Sewer Connection $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 $7,710Lake AnnInterceptor $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 $1,971Subtrunk $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 $2,068The Met Council SAC fee for 2021 remains the same as 2020 at $2,485.00.Amend Section 430 (c) 5.Sewer and water fees.Residential development:Shall pay a portion of the sewer and water hookup fees (area trunk fees) at the time of final subdivision approval: $691.00/unit (sewer) and $2,392 2,476.00/unit (water). The remainder of the sewer and water hookup fees shall becollected with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time.Parcels previously assessed trunk hookup fees are exempt. Residential trunk hookup fees are based per unit.*Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewertrunk hookup fees.Commercial, industrial and institutional development:Sewer and water trunk hookup fees (area trunk fees). Fee is paid at the time of building permit. Parcels previouslyassessed trunk hookup fees are exempt. Trunk hookup fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge(SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council for office or industrial/commercial buildings.*Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewertrunk hookup fees.All development:Lateral connection charges: If the lot or tract of land, or portion thereof, to be served by a lateral connection that hasnot been assessed for the cost of construction, then the applicant shall pay the following lateral connection:Sewer lateral connection charge $7,710.00Water lateral connection charge $9,841 10,185.00GIS FeesThe capabilities of GIS and our advanced use of the system has increased dramatically since the last time this fee wasadjusted. The GIS fee accounts for more than just incorporating parcel lines, which is actually done at the Countylevel. We incorporate all of the public utilities, stormwater BMP's, lighting, signage, streets, walks and trails.Amend Section 430 (c) 7.7. G.I.S fees $25.00100.00/plat, $10.0030.00/parcel, and $5.00 surcharge if the plat does not contain at leasttwo section corners or quarters and the length and bearing between them.Water and Sewage RatesFor 2021, the Ehlers and Associates analysis recommends an increase to the water utility rates for all tiers and the bulkrate. The goals of this year's rate study were to increase water revenues by 5% to keep pace with the needs of theWater Fund and to derive more revenue from indoor water use to become less dependent on irrigation consumption.To achieve these goals, we are recommending changes to the water rate structure primarily expanding the base usagetier and proposing more consistent residential tier breaks. The 2021 rate structure increases the gallons allowed intiers 2 and 3. In addition it provides for larger tiers for the commercial and industrial customers. This will assist smallbusinesses by helping to reduce their utility bill. Usage tiers have been adjusted slightly from the utility rate study tocorrect rounding on conversion from quarterly to the optional month billing. The utility rate analysis also recommendsa 5.35% increase to the sewer utility rates.Listed below is the 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and proposed 2021 water consumption rate structure along with thesewer rate structure:Water 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Fixed Charge (minimum per quarter)8.88 12.99 13.65 14.34 15.060 – 6,000 Gallons 1.22 1.22 1.28 1.346,001 – 24,000 Gallons 2.45 2.45 2.57 2.70 24,001 – 48,000 Gallons 3.06 3.21 3.37 3.54 48,001 – 99,000 Gallons 3.56 3.74 3.93 4.13 99,001+ Gallons (Irrigation and Residential Only)4.52 4.75 4.99 5.24 Residential / Irrigation 0 15,000 Gallons 2.20 15,001 30,000 Gallons 3.40 30,001 60,000 Gallons 4.04 60,001 90,000 Gallons 4.50 90,001+ Gallons 5.50 Commercial 0 51,000 Gallons 2.20 51,001 99,000 Gallons 3.40 99,001 150,000 Gallons 4.04 150,001 201,000 Gallons 4.50 201,001+ Gallons 5.50 MultiFamily 2.45 2.45 2.57 2.70 2.92 Bulk sales to contractors, landscapers, etc. at City fill stations or other designated locations 6.14 6.45 6.77 7.11 7.47 Sewer 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Minimum Charge (includes up to 6,000 gallons)23.85 30.00 31.50 33.09 34.86 Residential – amounts over 6,000 gallons (based on winter quarter usage)4.64 4.88 5.12 5.38 5.67 Commerical – amounts over 6,000 gallons (based on actual quarterly usage)4.64 4.88 5.12 5.38 5.67 Amend Section 445. Water and sewage rates. Utility rates are established for each 1,000 gallons of usage: Water : Fixed Charge (minimum water charge per quarter) $14.34 per quarter 0 to 6,000 gallons per quarter $1.34 per 1,000 gallons 6,001 to 24,000 gallons per quarter $2.70 per 1,000 gallons 24,001 to 48,000 gallons per quarter $3.54 per 1,000 gallons 48,001 to 99,000 gallons per quarter $4.13 per 1,000 gallons 99,001+ gallons per quarter (Irrigation and Residential Only) $5.24 per 1,000 gallons Multifamily properties – uniform water rate $2.70 per 1,000 gallons Bulk sales to contractors, landscapers, etc. at City fill stations or other designated locations $7.11 per 1,000 gallons Residential / Irrigation Fixed Charge (minimum water charge per quarter) $15.06 per quarter 0 to 15,000 gallons per quarter $2.20 per 1,000 gallons 15,001 to 30,000 gallons per quarter $3.40 per 1,000 gallons 30,001 to 60,000 gallons per quarter $4.04 per 1,000 gallons 60,001 to 90,000 gallons per quarter $4.50 per 1,000 gallons 90,001+ gallons per quarter $5.50 per 1,000 gallons Commerical Fixed Charge (minimum water charge per quarter)$15.06 per quarter 0 to 51,000 gallons per quarter $2.20 per 1,000 gallons Sanitarysewer $1,611.00/unit, or $2,302.00/unit if a portion of the sewer hookup fee was not paid at the time of finalsubdivision approval—(Lake Ann Interceptor $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)*Water $5,582 5,777.00/unit, or $7,974 8,253.00 if a portion of the water hookup fee was not paid at the time offinal subdivision approvalSACAs established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surchargeSanitary sewer $2,302.00/unit—(Lake Ann Interceptor $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)*Water $7,974 8,253.00/unitSACAs established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surchargeCITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, December 14, 2020SubjectOrdinance XXX: Amendment to City Code Chapter 4, FeesSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.3.Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts an Ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for2021."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDCity fees are designed to cover the cost of providing a specific service. The City's 2021 budget has been preparedbased on the rate changes to be approved. Any reduction to these proposed changes would result in a change in the2021 proposed budget.DISCUSSIONZoning PermitsA new zoning permit fee is proposed. The city currently issues zoning permits for structures that are exempted fromthe state's building permit requirements that have the potential to violate the city's zoning code.Generally, the city has relied on the individual to selfregulate their structures and to comply with their permit. Staff, aspart of the budget presentation, has proposed adding a parttime staff intern to inspect these structures to verifycompliance with the permit and city code and is recommending that we institute a zoning permit fee to recoup thecosts. The proposed new fee would be $50.00.Amend Section 430 (a).8. Zoning Permit Fee ….. $50.00 Technology FeeA new technology fee is proposed. The city has been upgrading its computer software and system to provide onlinepermitting options as well as increased internal efficiencies in permit review and information sharing. To help offsetthese costs, staff is proposing a 0.07 percent technology fee to be added to all permits, calculated on the permitvaluation.Staff undertook an analysis to determine what rate would provide a consistent fee even during low permit valuationyears. The years analyzed were 2016 2019. Staff analyzed rates of 0.0625, 0.07 and 0.08 percent. The 0.07percent rate provided a minimum of $50,000 during these years.Amend Section 430 (a).9. Technology Fee ….. 0.07 percent of permit valuation, on all permit typesThe following are changes to existing fees. The 2020 fees are shown in comparison as redlined amounts in thenarrative or in the tables below.Surface Water Management (Development) FeesThe City’s Local Surface Water Management Plan (LSWMP) was first adopted in February of 1994. It was lastamended in December of 2018. Based upon recommendations in that plan the City established surfacewater development fees as a means of financing citywide improvements recommended in the plan’s implementationsection. The initial fee was based upon the cost of the recommended pipes and ponds in the 1994 plan. The fees wereapportioned according to acreage and intensity of land use and intended to be a more equitable distribution of the costassociated with storm water runoff. This did not consider longterm maintenance of the facilities or increasedregulatory requirements.Since the original LSWMP was adopted, the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Municipal SeparateStorm Sewer System (NPDES MS4) permit was issued and revised multiple times. This permit allows the City tooperate its storm sewer system. Our local Watershed Districts have also implemented Rules and Standards the Citymust meet. This has resulted in increased surface water management requirements.The city continues to look at the significant life cycle costs of maintaining our existing infrastructure as well as the costof repairing damage caused by runoff in the past. Chanhassen has been replacing/repairing storm sewer infrastructurewith every road reconstruction project. The amount of infrastructure has increased substantially over what the Cityhad in 1994 and this amount continues to grow with each new development.As part of the 2021 Rate Study prepared by Ehlers & Associates, the city’s financial advisor, a two percent (2.0%)increase to the surface water management development fees is proposed.Amend Section 430 (c) 3.Surface water management (development )fees:Development Type Per Acre FeeParks/Open Space $4,820 4,920SingleFamily Residential $8,490 8,660Medium Density Residential $10,190 10,390Townhouse/Apartment Complex/High Density Residential $15,250 15,560Industrial$22,010 22,450Commercial$32,160 32,800Fees are based on the developable land. Undeveloped areas such as wetlands and buffers placed into an outlot,public parks, and public rightofway are exempt from these fees.Sewer and Water FeesA lateral connection charge replaces a missed assessment. When the city installs a pipe next to a property, someowners choose not to connect. In some instances, the city may not have assessed the property owner for their portionof the pipe. When those properties eventually connect, the lateral connection charge approximately covers the cost ofthe omitted assessment. These charges are only levied in rare instances. Trunk hookup charges, on the other hand,are for core utility infrastructure such as wells, lift stations, and trunk main oversizing. Every new lot in the city thathooks up to the utility system pays a trunk hookup charge.Hookup fees paid at the time of final residential subdivision approval remain the same for sewer at $691.00/unit andincrease for water from $2,392.00 to $2,476.00/unit. The remainder of the sewer and water hookup fee is collectedwith the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. The total sanitary hookup fee remains the same at $2,302.00and the total water hookup fee is increasing from $7,974.00 to $8,253.00. Parcels within the Lake Ann SewerDistrict will also be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewer trunk hookup fees. The LakeAnn Interceptor hookup fee remains at $1,971.00 and the subtrunk fee remains at $2,068.00. Commercial,industrial and institutional developments pay the total hookup fee at the time of building permit. Trunk hookup feesare based on the number of sanitary access charge (SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council for office orindustrial/commercial buildings.Lateral connection charges are charges for utility infrastructure which has been constructed by the city but were notassessed to or paid for a property. Sewer lateral connection charges remain the same at $7,710.00 and water lateralconnection charges increase from $9,841.00 to $10,185.00.2017 2018 2019 2020 Proposed2021Water Hookup $7,157 $7,443 $7,704 $7,974 $8,253Sewer Hookup $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 $2,302 $2,302Water Connection $8,833 $9,186 $9,508 $9,841 $10,185Sewer Connection $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 $7,710 $7,710Lake AnnInterceptor $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 $1,971 $1,971Subtrunk $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 $2,068 $2,068The Met Council SAC fee for 2021 remains the same as 2020 at $2,485.00.Amend Section 430 (c) 5.Sewer and water fees.Residential development:Shall pay a portion of the sewer and water hookup fees (area trunk fees) at the time of final subdivision approval: $691.00/unit (sewer) and $2,392 2,476.00/unit (water). The remainder of the sewer and water hookup fees shall becollected with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time.Parcels previously assessed trunk hookup fees are exempt. Residential trunk hookup fees are based per unit.*Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewertrunk hookup fees.Commercial, industrial and institutional development:Sewer and water trunk hookup fees (area trunk fees). Fee is paid at the time of building permit. Parcels previouslyassessed trunk hookup fees are exempt. Trunk hookup fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge(SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council for office or industrial/commercial buildings.*Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewertrunk hookup fees.All development:Lateral connection charges: If the lot or tract of land, or portion thereof, to be served by a lateral connection that hasnot been assessed for the cost of construction, then the applicant shall pay the following lateral connection:Sewer lateral connection charge $7,710.00Water lateral connection charge $9,841 10,185.00GIS FeesThe capabilities of GIS and our advanced use of the system has increased dramatically since the last time this fee wasadjusted. The GIS fee accounts for more than just incorporating parcel lines, which is actually done at the Countylevel. We incorporate all of the public utilities, stormwater BMP's, lighting, signage, streets, walks and trails.Amend Section 430 (c) 7.7. G.I.S fees $25.00100.00/plat, $10.0030.00/parcel, and $5.00 surcharge if the plat does not contain at leasttwo section corners or quarters and the length and bearing between them.Water and Sewage RatesFor 2021, the Ehlers and Associates analysis recommends an increase to the water utility rates for all tiers and the bulkrate. The goals of this year's rate study were to increase water revenues by 5% to keep pace with the needs of theWater Fund and to derive more revenue from indoor water use to become less dependent on irrigation consumption.To achieve these goals, we are recommending changes to the water rate structure primarily expanding the base usagetier and proposing more consistent residential tier breaks. The 2021 rate structure increases the gallons allowed intiers 2 and 3. In addition it provides for larger tiers for the commercial and industrial customers. This will assist smallbusinesses by helping to reduce their utility bill. Usage tiers have been adjusted slightly from the utility rate study tocorrect rounding on conversion from quarterly to the optional month billing. The utility rate analysis also recommendsa 5.35% increase to the sewer utility rates.Listed below is the 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and proposed 2021 water consumption rate structure along with thesewer rate structure:Water 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021Fixed Charge (minimum per quarter)8.88 12.99 13.65 14.34 15.060 – 6,000 Gallons 1.22 1.22 1.28 1.346,001 – 24,000 Gallons 2.45 2.45 2.57 2.7024,001 – 48,000 Gallons 3.06 3.21 3.37 3.5448,001 – 99,000 Gallons 3.56 3.74 3.93 4.1399,001+ Gallons (Irrigation and ResidentialOnly)4.52 4.75 4.99 5.24Residential / Irrigation0 15,000 Gallons 2.2015,001 30,000 Gallons 3.4030,001 60,000 Gallons 4.0460,001 90,000 Gallons 4.5090,001+ Gallons 5.50Commercial0 51,000 Gallons 2.2051,001 99,000 Gallons 3.4099,001 150,000 Gallons 4.04150,001 201,000 Gallons 4.50201,001+ Gallons 5.50MultiFamily 2.45 2.45 2.57 2.70 2.92Bulk sales to contractors, landscapers, etc.at City fill stations or other designatedlocations 6.14 6.45 6.77 7.11 7.47Sewer20172018201920202021Minimum Charge (includes up to 6,000gallons)23.85 30.00 31.50 33.09 34.86Residential – amounts over 6,000 gallons(based on winter quarter usage)4.64 4.88 5.12 5.38 5.67Commerical – amounts over 6,000 gallons(based on actual quarterly usage)4.64 4.88 5.12 5.38 5.67Amend Section 445.Water and sewage rates.Utility rates are established for each 1,000 gallons of usage:Water :Fixed Charge (minimum water charge per quarter) $14.34 per quarter0 to 6,000 gallons per quarter $1.34 per 1,000 gallons6,001 to 24,000 gallons per quarter $2.70 per 1,000 gallons24,001 to 48,000 gallons per quarter $3.54 per 1,000 gallons48,001 to 99,000 gallons per quarter $4.13 per 1,000 gallons99,001+ gallons per quarter (Irrigation and Residential Only) $5.24 per 1,000 gallonsMultifamily properties – uniform water rate $2.70 per 1,000 gallonsBulk sales to contractors, landscapers, etc. atCity fill stations or other designated locations $7.11 per 1,000 gallonsResidential / IrrigationFixed Charge (minimum water charge per quarter) $15.06 per quarter0 to 15,000 gallons per quarter $2.20 per 1,000 gallons15,001 to 30,000 gallons per quarter $3.40 per 1,000 gallons30,001 to 60,000 gallons per quarter $4.04 per 1,000 gallons60,001 to 90,000 gallons per quarter $4.50 per 1,000 gallons90,001+ gallons per quarter $5.50 per 1,000 gallonsCommerical Fixed Charge (minimum water charge per quarter)$15.06 per quarter 0 to 51,000 gallons per quarter $2.20 per 1,000 gallons 51,001 to 99,000 gallons per quarter $3.40 per 1,000 gallons 99,001 to 150,000 gallons per quarter $4.04 per 1,000 gallons 150,001 to 201,000 gallons per quarter $4.50 per 1,000 gallons 201,001+ gallons per quarter $5.50 per 1,000 gallons Multifamily properties – uniform water rate $2.92 per 1,000 gallons Bulk sales to contractors, landscapers, etc. at City fill stations or other designated locations $7.47 per 1,000 gallons Sewage: Residential based on winter quarter usage $5.38 5.67 per 1,000 gallons Commercial based on actual quarterly usage $5.38 5.67 per 1,000 gallons Minimum sewage charge per quarter $33.09 34.86 per quarter (for amounts up to 6,000 gallons per quarter) Surface Water Management (User) Fees The utility factor for each land use is not changing. The rates for tax parcels classified 1, 2 or 3 shall increase from $15.63 to $21.24. The rates for tax parcels classified 4 through 8 shall increase from $30.44 to $41.40. Amend Section 450. Surface water management user fees: Classification Land Use Utility Factor 1 Singlefamily and Rural residential Not Applicable 2 Agricultural Not Applicable 3 Undeveloped Not Applicable 4 Medium density residential 2.22 5 High density residential, Industrial, Office, Institutions (churches, schools, government buildings, hospitals) 3.30 6 Business/Commercial 4.23 7 Parks, cemeteries, golf courses, arboretum 0.46 8 Parking lots as a principal use 6.14 The surface water management user fee for each tax parcel classified 1, 2 and 3 shall be $15.63 21.24 per quarter. The surface water management user fee for each tax parcel classified 4 through 8 shall be calculated for each quarter as follows: $30.44 41.40 multiplied by the utility factor multiplied by the acreage of the parcel. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for 2021. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance Amending Chapter 4, Chanhassen City code, Fees Executive Summary of Utility Rate Analysis for 2021 Rates 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE- LICENSE, PERMIT AND ADMINISTRATIVE FEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 4-30 (a) of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to read as follows: 8. Zoning Permit Fee $50.00 Section 2. Section 4-30 (a) of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to read as follows: 9. Technology Fee 0.07 percent of permit valuation, on all permit types Section 3. Section 4-30 (c) 3 of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to read as follows: Surface water development fees: Development Type Per Acre Fee Parks/Open Space $4,920 Single Family Residential $8,660 Medium Density Residential $10,390 Townhouse/Apartment Complex/High Density Residential $15,560 Industrial $22,450 Commercial $32,800 Fees are based on the developable land. Undeveloped areas such as wetlands and buffers placed into an outlot, public parks, and public right-of-way are exempt from these fees. Section 4. Section 4-30 (c) 5 of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to read as follows: Sewer and water fees. Residential development: Shall pay a portion of the sewer and water hook-up fees (area trunk fees) at the time of final subdivision approval: $691.00/unit (sewer) and $2,476.00/unit (water). The remainder of the 2 sewer and water hook-up fees shall be collected with the building permit at the rate in effect at that time. Parcels previously assessed trunk hook-up fees are exempt. Residential trunk hook-up fees are based per unit. *Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewer trunk hook-up fees. Commercial, industrial and institutional development: Sewer and water trunk hook-up fees (area trunk fees). Fee is paid at the time of building permit. Parcels previously assessed trunk hook-up fees are exempt. Trunk hook-up fees are based on the number of sanitary access charge (SAC) units assigned by Metropolitan Council for office or industrial/commercial buildings. *Parcels within the Lake Ann Sewer District will be subject to the Lake Ann Trunk sewer fees in addition to the sewer trunk hook-up fees. All development: Lateral connection charges: If the lot or tract of land, or portion thereof, to be served by a lateral connection that has not been assessed for the cost of construction, then the applicant shall pay the following lateral connection: Sewer lateral connection charge $7,710.00 Water lateral connection charge $10,185.00 Section 5. 4-30 (c) 7 of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to read as follows: 7. G.I.S. fees - $100.00/plat, $30.00/parcel Section 6. Section 4-45 of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to read as follows: Utility rates are established for each 1,000 gallons of usage: Sanitary Sewer $1,611.00/unit, or $2,302.00/unit if a portion of the sewer hook-up fee was not paid at the time of final subdivision approval—(Lake Ann Interceptor - $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)* Water $5,777.00/unit, or $8,253.00 if a portion of the water hook-up fee was not paid at the time of final subdivision approval SAC As established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surcharge Sanitary Sewer $2,302.00/unit—(Lake Ann Interceptor - $1,971.00/unit and subtrunk $2,068.00/unit)* Water $8,253.00/unit SAC As established by the Metropolitan Council and $75.00 city SAC surcharge 3 Water: Residential / Irrigation Fixed Charge (minimum water charge per quarter) $15.06 per quarter 0 to 15,000 gallons per quarter $2.20 per 1,000 gallons 15,001 to 30,000 gallons per quarter $3.40 per 1,000 gallons 30,001 to 60,000 gallons per quarter $4.04 per 1,000 gallons 60,001 to 90,000 gallons per quarter $4.50 per 1,000 gallons 90,001+ gallons per quarter $5.50 per 1,000 gallons Commercial Fixed Charge (minimum water charge per quarter) $15.06 per quarter 0 to 51,000 gallons per quarter $2.20 per 1,000 gallons 51,001 to 99,000 gallons per quarter $3.40 per 1,000 gallons 99,001 to 150,000 gallons per quarter $4.04 per 1,000 gallons 150,001 to 201,000 gallons per quarter $4.50 per 1,000 gallons 201,001+ gallons per quarter $5.50 per 1,000 gallons Multi-family properties – uniform water rate $2.92 per 1,000 gallons Bulk sales to contractors, landscapers, etc. at City fill stations or other designated locations $7.47 per 1,000 gallons Sewage: Residential based on winter quarter usage $5.67 per 1,000 gallons Commercial based on actual quarterly usage $5.67 per 1,000 gallons Minimum sewage charge per quarter $34.86 per quarter (for amounts up to 6,000 gallons per quarter) Section 7. Section 4-50 of the City Code, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, is hereby amended to read as follows: Surface water management user fees. Classification Land Use Utility Factor 1 Single-family and Rural residential Not Applicable 2 Agricultural Not Applicable 3 Undeveloped Not Applicable 4 Medium density residential 2.22 5 High density residential, Industrial, Office, Institutions (churches, schools, government buildings, hospitals) 3.30 6 Business/Commercial 4.23 7 Parks, cemeteries, golf courses, arboretum 0.46 8 Parking lots as a principal use 6.14 The surface water management user fee for each tax parcel classified 1, 2 and 3 shall be $21.24 per quarter. 4 The surface water management user fee for each tax parcel classified 4 through 8 shall be calculated for each quarter as follows: $41.40 multiplied by the utility factor multiplied by the acreage of the parcel. Section 8. This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2021 after its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December, 2020, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ______________________________) Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 2 RATE SETTING POLICIES .......................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS ....................................................................... 3 WATER FUND .............................................................................................................. 4 SEWER FUND ............................................................................................................. 8 STORM WATER FUND ............................................................................................... 10 CASH RESERVES ...................................................................................................... 11 COMMUNITY COMPARISON ...................................................................................... 13 PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: SAMPLE BILLS ........................................................... 15 DEVELOPMENT FEES ................................................................................................ 15 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 20 Appendix A – Capital Improvement Plans Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan Sanitary Sewer Fund Capital Improvement Plan Storm Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan Appendix B – Projections Water Fund Projections Sanitary Sewer Fund Projections Storm Water Fund Projections Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 2 INTRODUCTION The goal of a rate study is to ensure the long-term financial health of the utility enterprise funds. Toward this end, the City of Chanhassen conducts an annual update to its utility rate study. This rate study provides a recommendation for the 2021 user rates and development fees of the water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities. The City has two types of development fees: the first are water and sewer hook-up fees that are paid based on a properties SAC units as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and a storm water area charge that is paid based on net developable acreage. This year’s rate study reviews each utility fund to ensure that the recommended rates and fees will be adequate to support all operations and capital costs in 2021 and into the future. This report details the findings and the recommendations for each utility, provides an estimated 2021 utility bill for a sample homeowner and a business, and reviews development fees. To date, the utility funds have been well managed and have adequate cash reserves. However, each utility is facing unique challenges that are now putting upward pressure on rates. Water Fund – several wet years have depressed water revenues. The City’s existing rate structure promotes water conservation and thus generates higher fees for irrigation than indoor water use. Recent wet years with less irrigation disproportionately affect revenue under the current rate structure. Sewer Fund – the single biggest expense in the sewer fund is the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) disposal fees. Those fees will increase 18.9% between 2020 and 2021 putting financial pressure on the utility’s revenues to match the increased expense. Storm Water Fund – The City is committed to adequately maintaining its stormwater ponds and other related infrastructure and is planning to add $350,000 per year to its capital expenditures beginning in 2021. To address these financial challenges, Ehlers provides the following recommendations for annual increases to utility rates and development fees. Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 3 Table 1. Proposed Rate Increases Utility Fee Projections 2019 Study Projected Annual Increases 2020 Study 2021 Increase Future Years Water 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Sewer 5.00% 5.35% 5.35% Storm Water 4.00% 36.00% 6.00% Development Fee Projections 2019 Rate Study 2020 Rate Study Water 3.50% 3.50% Sewer 0.00% 0.00% Storm Water 2.00% 2.00% As detailed on pages 5-6, we further recommend changing the water rate structure to reduce revenue volatility due to levels of precipitation. RATE SETTING POLICIES The City of Chanhassen has used the following policies to guide its rate setting practices: 1. The City intends for growth to pay for its supporting infrastructure through the collection of hook -up fees. We have quantified the capital costs associated with growth, including 50% of the debt service for the newest water treatment plant, and established hook-up fees that cover those costs. 2. The City will maintain reserves in its utility funds in an amount equal to 50% of annual operating expenses plus 10% of accumulated depreciation . METHODOLOGY AND ASSUMPTIONS As part of this year’s study, Ehlers prepared a 10 -year cash flow projection for the water , sewer and storm water utility funds through the year 20 30. This projection examines anticipated cash flows in future years and estimate s the user rate increases necessary to meet all financial obligations of the utility funds while maintaining adequate cash reserves . The cash flow analysis method determines future revenue requirements by incorporating operating and maintenance expenses, transfer payments, current and future debt service and anticipated future capital projects. We also include future growth estimates in the model. The primary financial inputs in the development of the analysis were the C ity’s audited financial statements, budget documents, annual water billing data for 2016, and the City’s latest Capital Improvement Plan. The City elected to use billing data from 2016 because water consumption that year was relatively moderate and consist ent with the trend for water use shown in Figure 3. The cashflow projections include the following assumptions: Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 4 • 3-4% annual inflation on operating costs. • 4% annual inflation on capital expenses. • 5% annual inflation on MCES disposal charges. • Growth as 80 new residential units for 2020, 130 new residential units per year for 2021-2024, then 120 new residential units per year thereafter and 25 new commercial SAC units per year for 2021-2030. • Water use for existing residential customers and irrigation meters is 96.5% of 2016 water consumption. Water use for multifamily and commercial customers is at 98.5% of 2016 consumption. Usage was reduced slightly from 2016 levels to reflect the fact that across the metro area water consumption has been declining. • For future growth users, we assumed water use equal to 50 gallons per person per day and 2 persons per new household. Engineers typically estimate 72 gallons per person per day for water demand and we conservatively assumed less than that so as not to overestimate revenues. We did not assume any future water use from new commercial development. Funding capital improvements for a growing community as well as replacing aging utility infrastructure drive the ne ed for adequate utility revenue. City staff developed a 10 -year Capital Improvement Plan for each utility (See Appendix A). All capital costs listed in Appendix A are in today’s dollars. The costs were then inflated 4% annually as shown at the bottom of the table. The capital costs in the cashflow projections in Appendix B use the inflated costs. WATER FUND The rate study proposes a 5% annual water revenue increase in 2021 and continuing annually thereafter. The recommended revenue increase is consistent with last year’s rate study. However, this study is also recommending changes to the rate structure in 2021 intended to reduce revenue volatility. The 5% revenue increase in 2021 and beyond will help pay for the City’s projected investment in expanding and improving the water system as well as water projects completed as part of the Street Improvement Program. Between 2021 and 2030, the City plans to spend $20.7 million on capital improvements (in inflated dollars) from the water utility fund (see Appendix A). Of that amount, the rate study anticipates the need to finance $13.7 million. The chart below outlines some of the major water system capital projects in the City’s water capital improvement plan. Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 5 Table 2. Water Utility Major Capital Improvements Major Projects Year Amount (Today’s Dollars) Average Debt Service Annually $2,900,000 Street Improvement Program Annually $450,000 TH101 Imp-Pioneer Tr to Flying Cloud Dr 2020-2021 $1,000,000 Low Zone 1M Gal. Elevated Storage Tank 2025 $2,600,000 New Wells 2025 and 2029 $2,600,000 Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements 2025 $1,100,000 Capital and annual debt expenditures comprise 70% of the total cash expenditures in the Water Fund in 2021 as shown in Figure 3. These are fixed costs, regardless of annual fluctuations in consumption, and therefore the revenue stream needs to be reliable from year to year. Figure 1. 2021 Water Expenditures (Excluding Depreciation) As rainfall has increased (see Figure 1), the City has been pumping less water (see Figure 2) and water revenues have not experienced the slow but steady increase that prior rate studies had projected. For example, in 2019 revenues actually declined $177,598 from the prior year despite 5% rate increases and new development connecting to the system. In fact, the last two rainy summers have resulted in water revenue shortfalls of over $500,000 from past projections. Operating (excl. depreciation) 30% Capital 30% Debt 40% 2021 Water Expenditures Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 6 Figure 2. Rainfall in the Twin Cities 1998 – 2019 Figure 3. Water Pumped in the City of Chanhassen 2009-2019 The goals for this year’s rate study were to increase water revenues by 5% in 2021 to keep pace with the needs of the Water Fund and to derive more revenue from indoor water use to become less dependent on irrigation consumption. To achieve these goals, we are recommending changes to the water rate structure: primarily expanding the base usage tier and proposing more consistent residential tier breaks . The current rate structure is shown in Table 2 and the proposed changes are shown in Table 3. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019Rainfall in Inches May -September - 200,000,000 400,000,000 600,000,000 800,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,200,000,000 1,400,000,000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Water Pumped in Gallons Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 7 Table 2. Current Rate Structure and 2020 Fee Schedule Table 3. Proposed Rate Structure and 2021 Fee Schedule The proposed 2021 rate structure increases the gallons allowed in Tiers 2 and 3. In addition it provides for larger tiers for the commercial and industrial customers. This will assist small businesses Flat Rates All Users Minimum Charge $14.34 Usage Rates Residential/Comm./Irrigation 0-6,000 gallons $1.34 6,001-24,000 gallons 2.70 24,001-48,000 gallons 3.54 48,001-99,000 gallons 4.13 > 99,001 gallons 5.24 Multi-Family All Usage, per 1,000 gallons $2.70 Flat Rates All Users Minimum Charge $15.06 Usage Rates Residential/Irrigation 0-15,000 gallons $2.20 15,001 - 30,000 gallons 3.40 30,001 - 60,000 gallons 4.04 60,001 - 90,000 gallons 4.50 > 90,001 gallons 5.50 Commercial 0-50,000 gallons $2.20 50,001 - 100,000 gallons 3.40 100,001 - 150,000 gallons 4.04 150,001 - 200,000 gallons 4.50 > 200,001 gallons 5.50 Multi-Family All Usage, per 1,000 gallons $2.92 Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 8 by helping to reduce their utility bill. The financial impact of the proposed changes on sample residential utility customers is shown below in Table 4. Table 4. Impact on Quarterly Residential Water Bills. Overall, the proposed changes to the tier structure are still intended to increase revenues 5% from 2020 to 2021. The rate study is projecting 5% increases to the proposed 2021 rates in 2022 and beyond. SEWER FUND The driving factors in setting future sewer rates are anticipated MCES disposal charge increases and the City’s planned capital costs. The MCES disposal charge represents 50% of the operating expenses within the Sewer Fund as shown in Figure 4. The city has been informed that there will be a 18.9% increase for 2021. This follows a 9.7% increase from 2019 to 2020. Type Low Medium High Very High Sample Usage 10,000 15,000 24,250 212,500 Base Fee 15.06$ 15.06$ 15.06$ 15.06$ Tier 1 22.00 33.00 33.00 33.00 Tier 2 - - 31.45 51.00 Tier 3 - - - 121.20 Tier 4 - - - 135.00 Tier 5 - - - 673.75 Total Water Bill 37.06$ 48.06$ 79.51$ 1,029.01$ $ Increase/(Decrease) 3.88$ 1.38$ 7.64$ 67.70$ over 2020 Existing Rates Recommended 2021 Rates & Tier Breaks RESIDENTIAL ACCOUNTS Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 9 Figure 4. 2021 Sewer Expenditures (Excluding Depreciation) Between 2021 and 2030, the City plans to spend $12.6 million on capital improvements (in inflated dollars) from the sewer utility fund, a 12% increase over the prior year’s rate study. Of that amount, the rate study anticipates the need to finance $8.35 million. The chart below outlines some of the major water system capital projects in the City’s sewer capital improvement plan. Table 6. Sewer Utility Major Capital Improvements A detailed list of the capital improvements is in Appendix A. If actual capital costs or MCES disposal charges increase further in the future, higher annual rate increases will be required. Many of these potential future costs (i.e. rising construction costs and MCES disposal charges) are outside of the City’s immediate control. The proposed sewer rates are shown in Table 7 below. The recommended sewer rate increase of 5.35% in 2021 is higher than the previous rate studies’ 5% projected increase and reflects the increases in the MCES disposal charges plus planned capital costs. Other Operating 18% Capital 29% Debt 3% MCES 50% Project Year Amount (Today’s Dollars) Average Debt Service Annually $460,000 Street Improvement Program Annually $225,000 Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Annually $200,000 TH101 Imp-Pioneer Tr to Flying Cloud Dr (CSAH 61) 2020/2021 $1,000,000 2010 MUSA Sanitary Lift Station 2023 $950,000 Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements 2025 $1,800,000 Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 10 Table 7. Proposed Sewer Rates STORM WATER FUND Managing storm water is a significant and increasingly complex mandate imposed on cities by the state. Meeting new storm water requirements is expensive and is putting pressure on all cities to increase storm water rates. In addition, the City’s storm water system of pipes and ponds is aging and requires additional maintenance as reflected in two changes to the Storm Water Fund this year. First, the 2021 budget includes a $100,000 increase in operating costs. Second, the City has determined it needs to increase its pond maintenance by $3.5 million over the next ten years. Therefore, the storm water capital improvement plan in Appendix A includes $350,000 per year for additional storm water maintenance beginning in 2021. Between 2021 and 2030, the City plans to spend $17.7 million on capital improvements (in inflated dollars) from the storm water utility fund. Of that amount, the rate study anticipates the need to finance $9.8 million. The major projects within the Storm Water fund are outlined in the following table. Table 8. Storm Water Utility Major Capital Improvements Actual Actual Proposed Quarterly Rates 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Flat Rates All Users Minimum Charge $31.50 $33.09 $34.86 $36.73 $38.69 $40.76 $42.94 Usage Rates All Users >6000 gallons $5.12 $5.38 $5.67 $5.97 $6.29 $6.63 $6.98 Project Year Amount Storm Water Pond Improvements Annually $300,000 Additional Storm Water Pond Maintenance Annually $350,000 Street Improvement Program Annually $500,000 Street Sweeper 2023 $310,000 Christmas Lake Channel Stabilization 2024 $200,000 Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 11 In order to fund the additional maintenance and capital expense, the City will need to generate more storm water revenue. We propose a 36% increase in 2021 followed by more moderate 6% annual increases thereafter. This percentage increase translates into the rates shown in Table 9 below. Table 9. Proposed Storm Water Rates CASH RESERVES Cash balances in the utility funds serve several purposes. Adequate cash balances provide the needed cashflow for the city during potential seasonal mismatches between revenues and expenses. In addition, the City needs to have cash on hand as of December 31 each year to make its February bond payments. Appendix B is the 10-year cash flow analyses for the City’s utility funds. The cash flow analysis for each fund calculates the user rate revenue increases necessary to meet the estimated annual expenses of the utility and maintain a minimum recommended reserve level (“Target Working Capital”). The following graphs show the projected year end cash balance in each utility fund as compared to the Target Working Capital. For the water and sewer funds, the Target Working Capital equals 50% of annual operating expenses (excluding depreciation) plus 10% accumulated depreciation. The following graphs show that the City is projected to meet its goals for cash reserves for each utility. Actual Actual Proposed Quarterly Rates 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Flat Rates Residential Base Charge $14.88 $15.62 $21.24 $22.52 $23.87 $25.30 $26.82 Commercial/Industrial Base Charge $28.99 $30.44 $41.40 $43.88 $46.51 $49.31 $52.26 Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 12 Figure 4. Projected Cash Balance in the Water Fund Figure 5. Projected Cash Balance in the Sewer Fund 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Water Fund Projected Cash Balances Target Working Capital Actual Working Capital 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Sewer Fund Projected Cash Balances Target Working Capital Actual Working Capital Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 13 Figure 6. Projected Cash Balance in the Storm Water Fund For the Storm Water Fund, the Target Working Capital was established at $1,000,000 in 2016 and inflated 4% annually to keep up with anticipated construction costs. Because the City is expecting more routine capital expenditures within the fund, beginning in 2022 we are recommending that the formula for Target Working Capital switch to equal 50% of operating plus the next year’s debt service. This explains the 2022 dip in Target Working Capital in the graph in Figure 6. COMMUNITY COMPARISON Each community has different demands on its utility systems that make it unique – different growth patterns, groundwater sources, soil conditions, usage patterns and infrastructure. Therefore, one should set rates based on documented need, as the City of Chanhassen does through its annual rate study. Nevertheless, it is informative to know how the City’s rates and charges compare to other developing communities with similar characteristics – namely the KFS communities Chanhassen has previously identified as well as its neighbors. Figure 7 shows a comparison of Chanhassen’s proposed 2021 charges to a 2020 bill of neighboring communities for an example residential customer who uses 26,000 gallons of water and sewer. Figure 8 shows the same for each KFS city. 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Storm Water Fund Projected Cash Balances Target Working Capital Actual Working Capital Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 14 Figure 7. Quarterly Bill Comparison of Neighboring Communities Figure 8. Quarterly Bill Comparison of KFS Communities Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 15 PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER: SAMPLE BILLS The chart below shows sample bills for a residential and commercial customer throughout the period of the analysis. Table 10. Sample Quarterly Utility Bill for a Residential and Commercial Customer DEVELOPMENT FEES The pace of City growth has a great impact on the utility fees collected, the hook-up revenues, and storm water area charges. The rate study assumes there will be 80 new residential units constructed for 2020, 130 new units annually from 2021 through 2024, and 120 units per year thereafter. In addition to the residential growth, 25 SAC units per year are assumed to come from new commercial development and irrigation meters. These assumptions align with City staff expectations for the period. The rate study recommends increases for hook-up fees to balance the need to keep development fees competitive in the marketplace while also covering the City’s growth-related infrastructure costs. Actual Actual 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Residential Property Water (26,000 gallons/quarter)74.33$ 78.06$ 81.96$ 86.06$ 90.36$ 94.88$ 99.63$ Sewer (26,000 gallons/quarter)133.90 140.69 148.22 156.15 164.50 173.30 182.57 Storm Water 14.88 15.62 21.24 22.52 23.87 25.30 26.82 Total Quarterly Utility Bill 223.11$ 234.37$ 251.42$ 264.73$ 278.73$ 293.48$ 309.02$ Total Annual Utility Bills 892.44$ 937.48$ 1,005.69$ 1,058.91$ 1,114.92$ 1,173.92$ 1,236.08$ $ Increase/(Decrease)11.26 17.05 13.30 14.00 14.75 15.54 5.0%7.3%5.3%5.3%5.3%5.3% Commercial Property Water (50,000 gallons/quarter)156.33$ 164.20$ 172.41$ 181.03$ 190.08$ 199.59$ 209.57$ Sewer (50,000 gallons/quarter)256.78 269.81 284.24 299.45 315.47 332.35 350.13 Storm Water (Classified 6 w/1 acre)122.63 128.76 175.11 185.62 196.76 208.56 221.08 Total Quarterly Utility Bill 535.74$ 562.77$ 631.76$ 666.10$ 702.31$ 740.50$ 780.78$ Total Annual Utility Bills 2,142.95$ 2,251.08$ 2,527.05$ 2,664.40$ 2,809.22$ 2,962.01$ 3,123.10$ $ Increase/(Decrease)27.03 68.99 34.34 36.21 38.20 40.27 % Increase/(Decrease)5.0%12.3%5.4%5.4%5.4%5.4% Proposed Quarterly Bills Utility Rates Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 16 Table 11. Proposed Increases to Water and Sewer Hook-up Fees Projected Hook-Up Fee Increases 2019 Study 2020 Study Water 3.50% 3.50% Sewer 0.00% 0.00% Storm Water 2.00% 2.00% The proposed water and sewer development fees for a single-family home are listed in the chart below. Table 12. Proposed Water and Sewer Hook-Up Fees The city also applies a Storm Water Area Charge when land is platted to pay for off-site storm water improvements. Most developments receive a credit for a portion of this charge when completing identified on-site improvements that reduce water run-off and improve water quality. Staff estimates the average credit is about 50%. The fees, before the credit, are listed in the chart below and are proposed to increase 2% annually. Table 13. Proposed Storm Water Area Charge Charge Per Acre 2020 (Before Credits) Proposed 2021 (Before Credits) Single Family $ 8,490 $ 8,659 Townhouse $15,252 $15,557 Apartment Complex/ High Density $15,252 $15,557 Commercial $32,159 $32,802 Industrial $22,015 $22,455 The City requested Ehlers to provide a community comparison of hook-up fees and area charges for three sample developments: 1. A single-family home located on 1/3 net developable acre; 2. A 100-unit multifamily development on 4 net developable acres; and 3. A 130,000 square foot industrial development with 34 SAC units on 8 net developable acres. Single Family Home Development Fees 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 City WAC Fees 5,582 5,777 5,979 6,189 6,405 6,629 City SAC Fees 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 City Surcharge 75 75 75 75 75 75 TOTAL 7,268 7,463 7,665 7,875 8,091 8,315 Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 17 The comparison was made with both neighboring communities and the City’s identified KFS cities and is shown graphically in the following charts. The comparison assumes developers receive a 50% credit on their storm water area charge. Figure 9. Utility Development Fees on a Single-Family Home in Neighboring Communities Figure 10. Utility Development Fees on a Single-Family Home in KFS Communities Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 18 Figure 11. Utility Development Fees for a 100-Unit Multifamily Project in Neighboring Communities Figure 12. Utility Development Fees for a 100-Unit Multifamily Project in KFS Communities Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 19 Figure 13. Utility Development Fees for an Industrial Development in Neighboring Communities Figure 14. Utility Development Fees for an Industrial Development in KFS Communities Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Page 20 SUMMARY The utility funds have been well managed and have adequate cash reserves. However, each utility is facing unique challenges putting upward pressure on rates. To address these challenges, Ehlers makes the following recommendations for annual increases to utility rates and development fees. Table 14. Proposed Rate Increases Utility Fee Projections 2019 Study Projected Annual Increases 2020 Study 2021 Increase Future Years Water 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Sewer 5.00% 5.35% 5.35% Storm Water 4.00% 36.00% 6.00% Hook-Up Fee Projections 2019 Rate Study 2020 Rate Study Water 3.50% 3.50% Sewer 0.00% 0.00% Storm Water 2.00% 2.00% In addition, we are recommending changes to the water rate structure starting in 2021 to stabilized revenue during years of high precipitation. While the percentage rate increase will vary from one customer to the next depending on individual consumption, the proposed 2021 rates as a whole are designed to generate 5% more revenue than the prior year. The proposed rate increases accommodate the City’s commitment to funding street reconstruction projects, expand and maintain the systems, and maintain adequate cash reserves. Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Appendix A – Capital Improvement Plans Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan Sanitary Sewer Fund Capital Improvement Plan Storm Water Fund Capital Improvement Plan City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study Water System Capital Improvement Program 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 OPERATING PROJECTS SCBA Equipment (EQ-004)20,000 Software Purchases (EQ-048)11,950 15,800 16,300 17,000 17,700 18,400 Generator (EQ-059)55,000 Light Duty Trucks: Utilities (EQ-062)19,000 33,000 70,000 40,000 72,000 20,000 Annual Skid Loader Trade-In (EQ-124)7,517 2,520 2,520 2,520 2,520 Bobcat Trailer Replacement (EQ-160)3,600 Mailing Folder/Inserter (EQ-161)5,000 Generator Truck (EQ-168)62,500 Finance Software Replacement (EQ-177)7,300 10,200 8,500 Utility Infrastructure Fiber Connectivity (MB-036)15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Public Works Building Maintenance (MB-037)4,000 6,000 1,750 2,500 Annual Street Improvement Program (ST-012)991,000 1,300,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 Galpin Blvd Improvements - Hwy 5 N to City Limits (ST-040)500,000 MSA Improvements - Lake Lucy Road (ST-045)120,000 MSA Improvements - Lake Drive East (ST-048)120,000 Downtown Water Reuse Project (SWMP-057)50,000 Well Rehabilitation Program (W-032)51,000 81,000 121,000 86,000 43,000 115,000 138,000 131,000 58,000 87,000 131,000 Well #4 Re-roofing Project (W-064)18,000 Repaint Watertower Place Tank (W-061) Powers Bld Watermain Loop (W-063)510,000 Trunk Watermain Maintenance (W-065)25,000 500,000 25,000 500,000 25,000 500,000 25,000 500,000 25,000 500,000 EWTP Influent Meter (W-066)40,000 Future Capital - Operating 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Subtotal - Operating 1,605,950 1,554,417 1,258,120 760,470 1,606,720 773,420 1,303,000 821,000 1,295,000 797,000 1,296,000 Inflated Project Costs - Operating 1,605,950 1,616,594 1,360,783 855,425 1,879,635 940,984 1,648,711 1,080,380 1,772,297 1,134,380 1,918,397 CONNECTION PROJECTS Well #16 (W-059)(W-059)1,400,000 Well #17 1,200,000 Well #18 Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements (SS-024)1,100,000 TH101 Imp-Pioneer Tr to Flying Cloud Dr (CSAH 61) (ST-032)500,000 500,000 Low Zone 1M Gal. Elevated Storage Tank (W-046)2,600,000 MUSA Trunk Watermain Oversizing (W-056) West Water Treatment Plant (W-037) Future Capital - Connection 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal - Connection 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 5,100,000 0 0 0 1,200,000 0 Inflated Project Costs - Connection 500,000 520,000 0 0 0 6,204,930 0 0 0 1,707,974 0 Total CIP 2,105,950 2,054,417 1,258,120 760,470 1,606,720 5,873,420 1,303,000 821,000 1,295,000 1,997,000 1,296,000 Percent Inflation 4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4% Total Inflated Project Costs 2,105,950 2,136,594 1,360,783 855,425 1,879,635 7,145,913 1,648,711 1,080,380 1,772,297 2,842,354 1,918,397 12/8/2020 Page 1 - Water CIP City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study Sanitary Sewer System Capital Improvement Program 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 OPERATING PROJECTS Dump/Plow Truck Replacements/Additions (EQ-016) Software Purchases (EQ-048)11,950 15,800 16,300 17,000 17,700 18,400 Generator (EQ-059)55,000 Light Duty Trucks: Utilities (EQ-062)19,000 33,000 70,000 40,000 72,000 20,000 Vactor/Sewer Jetting Truck (EQ-110)538,000 Annual Skid Loader Trade-In (EQ-124)7,517 2,520 2,520 2,520 2,520 Utility Dept - Generator Trailer (EQ-133) Bobcat Trailer Replacement (EQ-160)3,600 Mailing Folder/Inserter (EQ-161)5,000 Generator Truck (EQ-168)62,500 Finance Software Replacement (EQ-177)7,300 10,200 8,500 Sanitary Sewer Maintenance - SL-RAT (EQ-176)26,000 Utility Infrastructure Fiber Connectivity (MB-036)15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Public Works Building Maintenance (MB-037)4,000 6,000 1,750 2,500 Sanitary Sewer Replacement (SS-014) Sanitary Lift Station Rehabilitation Program (SS-017)130,000 120,000 130,000 170,000 150,000 95,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Lift Station Access Improvements (SS-027)75,000 125,000 Annual Street Improvement Program (ST-012)192,500 420,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 Galpin Blvd Improvements - Hwy 5 N to City Limits (ST-040)250,000 MSA Improvements - Lake Lucy Road (ST-045)35,000 MSA Improvements - Lake Drive East (ST-048)35,000 Christmas Lake Channel Stabilization (SWMP -060)5,000 50,000 Future Capital - Operating 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Subtotal - Operating 358,450 679,417 512,120 509,470 913,720 453,420 440,000 978,000 512,000 460,000 440,000 Inflated Project Costs - Operating 358,450 706,594 553,909 573,084 1,068,923 551,655 556,740 1,286,981 700,707 654,723 651,307 CONNECTION PROJECTS Inflow and Infiltration Abatement (SS-012)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 2010 MUSA Sanitary Lift Station (SS-020)950,000 Lower Bluff Creek Trunk Utility Improvements (SS-024)1,800,000 MUSA Trunk Sanitary Sewer Oversizing (SS-025) Reconstruct-Cty Rd 61 from TH101 to Charlson Rd (ST-033) TH101 Imp-Pioneer Tr to Flying Cloud Dr (CSAH 61) (ST-032)500,000 500,000 Sub-District LB-1 Trunk Lift Station Future Capital - Connection Subtotal - Connection 700,000 700,000 200,000 1,150,000 200,000 2,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Inflated Project Costs - Connection 700,000 728,000 216,320 1,293,594 233,972 2,433,306 253,064 263,186 273,714 284,662 296,049 Total CIP 1,058,450 1,379,417 712,120 1,659,470 1,113,720 2,453,420 640,000 1,178,000 712,000 660,000 640,000 Percent Inflation 4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4% Total Inflated Project Costs 1,058,450 1,434,594 770,229 1,866,678 1,302,895 2,984,961 809,804 1,550,168 974,421 939,386 947,356 12/8/2020 Page 2 - Sewer CIP City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study Storm Water System Capital Improvement Program PROJECTS 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Software Purchases (EQ-048)11,950 15,800 16,300 17,000 17,700 18,400 Annual Skid Loader Trade In (EQ-124)7,516 2,520 2,520 2,520 2,520 Street Sweeper (EQ-170)5,000 310,000 Finance Software Replacement (EQ-177)3,650 5,100 4,250 Lift Station Access Improvements (SS-027)75,000 50,000 Annual Street Improvement Program (ST-012)185,500 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 MSA Improvements - Lake Lucy Road (ST-045)35,000 MSA Improvements - Lake Drive East (ST-048)35,000 Property Acquisition (SWMP-014) St Improvement Projects - Storm Water Mgmt.(SWMP-019) Lower Bluff Creek TMDL Implementation (SWMP-024)50,000 Storm Water Pond Improvements (SWMP-032)300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Storm Water Infrastructure Maint./Replacement (SWMP-045)50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Lotus Lake Channels & Outfall Improvements (SWMP-046)50,000 Upper Riley Creek Channel Stabilization (SWMP-048)100,000 Rice Marsh Lake iron enhanced san filter (SWMP-053)50,000 Stormwater Management Partnership Program (SWMP-059)25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Pioneer Trail Flood Mitigation (SWMP-056) Downtown Water Reuse Project (SWMP-057)50,000 Christmas Lake Channel Stabilization (SWMP-060)5,000 200,000 Red Cedar Point Stormwater Improvements (SWMP-061)3,000 100,000 Additional Pond Maintenance 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Future Projects 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Total CIP 602,450 1,256,316 1,507,470 1,744,620 1,499,470 1,295,920 1,375,000 1,375,000 1,375,000 1,375,000 1,375,000 Percent Inflation 4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4% Inflated Project Costs 602,450 1,306,569 1,630,480 1,962,460 1,754,168 1,576,685 1,739,814 1,809,406 1,881,782 1,957,054 2,035,336 12/8/2020 Page 3 - Storm Water CIP Utility Rate Study December 2020 Chanhassen, Minnesota Appendix B – Projections Water Fund Projections Sanitary Sewer Fund Projections Storm Water Fund Projections City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study 1 Rates Inflation 2 Revenue growth assumption - non-usage 3 Investment income yield 4 Expense growth - general and admin 5 Expense growth - contractual 6 Expense growth - non personnel 7 Connection fee increase 8 MCES rate increase 9 10 Beginning net assets 11 12 Operating Revenues 13 Water Sales 14 Sewer Charges 15 Storm Sewer Charges 16 Penalties and other 17 Intergovernmental 19 Total Operating Revenues 20 21 Operating Expenses 22 Personal services 23 Materials and supplies 24 MCES 25 Other contractual services 26 Repairs and maintenance 27 Depreciation 28 Total Operating Expenses 29 30 Net Operations 31 Non operating revenues (expenses) 32 Investment income 33 Connection charges 34 Intergovernmental 35 Refunds and reimbursements 36 Interest and fiscal charges 37 Gain (loss) on disposal of Capital assets 38 Transfers in 39 Transfers out 40 Contributions of Capital assets 41 Special assessments 42 Total non operating revenue (expenses) 43 Prior period adjustment 44 Net increase (decrease) in resources 45 46 Ending net assets Water Fund Budget Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%2.00%2.00%2.00% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50% 33,503,241 33,528,323 34,742,933 33,032,450 32,149,803 32,040,940 32,005,337 32,203,909 32,643,394 33,244,117 34,095,865 35,210,663 36,645,411 38,380,101 2,824,929 2,994,530 2,816,932 3,000,000 3,488,307 3,669,732 3,864,690 4,070,240 4,284,669 4,512,226 4,751,826 5,004,106 5,269,734 5,548,948 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91,710 114,276 114,732 99,000 106,000 108,120 110,282 112,488 114,738 117,033 119,374 121,761 124,196 126,680 0 0 131 2,916,639 3,108,806 2,931,795 3,099,000 3,594,307 3,777,852 3,974,972 4,182,728 4,399,407 4,629,259 4,871,200 5,125,867 5,393,930 5,675,628 778,844 812,519 798,372 825,500 832,500 857,475 883,199 909,695 936,986 965,096 994,049 1,023,870 1,054,586 1,086,224 298,098 385,900 314,739 427,800 412,600 420,852 429,269 437,854 446,612 455,544 464,655 473,948 483,427 493,095 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 442,319 695,072 1,747,925 525,300 541,100 557,333 574,053 591,275 609,013 627,283 646,102 665,485 685,449 706,013 374,056 263,528 369,890 322,500 351,700 362,251 373,119 384,312 395,841 407,717 419,948 432,547 445,523 458,889 1,669,757 1,607,497 1,955,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 3,563,074 3,764,516 5,186,813 4,376,987 4,413,787 4,473,798 4,535,527 4,599,023 4,664,339 4,731,526 4,800,640 4,871,736 4,944,872 5,020,107 (646,435)(655,710)(2,255,018)(1,277,987)(819,480)(695,946)(560,555)(416,295)(264,931)(102,268)70,560 254,131 449,058 655,520 120,248 159,813 281,251 50,000 102,165 76,973 75,399 71,777 73,582 74,520 79,695 124,571 137,292 140,774 688,257 2,387,509 1,450,925 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,282,948 1,327,852 1,374,326 1,333,408 1,380,077 1,428,380 1,478,373 1,530,116 1,583,670 8,778 0 173,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,297 12,486 3,747 5,000 5,000 5,250 5,513 5,788 6,078 6,381 6,700 7,036 7,387 7,757 (303,736)(752,091)(655,693)(692,722)(796,548)(704,829)(649,636)(596,113)(547,413)(506,963)(470,538)(429,363)(389,163)(369,888) 0 (45,983)3,499 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,063 7,223 9,453 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (580,671)(221,003)(578,477)(166,939)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 709,699 310,743 679,114 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,582 11,623 3,996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 671,517 1,870,320 1,370,915 395,340 710,617 660,343 759,128 855,779 865,655 954,016 1,044,238 1,180,617 1,285,633 1,362,313 25,082 1,214,610 (884,103)(882,648)(108,863)(35,603)198,573 439,484 600,723 851,748 1,114,798 1,434,748 1,734,691 2,017,834 33,528,323 34,742,933 33,858,830 32,149,803 32,040,940 32,005,337 32,203,909 32,643,394 33,244,117 34,095,865 35,210,663 36,645,411 38,380,101 40,397,935 Actual Projected 12/8/2020 Page 1 - Cashflow City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study 1 Rates Inflation 2 Revenue growth assumption - non-usage 3 Investment income yield 4 Expense growth - general and admin 5 Expense growth - contractual 6 Expense growth - non personnel 7 Connection fee increase 8 MCES rate increase 9 47 CIP Funding 48 Purchase of Capital Assets 49 Proceeds from internal borrowing 50 Bond Proceeds - Operating Projects 51 Bond Proceeds - Connection Projects 52 Bond P&I - Future 53 Bond P&I - Future 54 Bond P&I - Future 55 Bond P&I - Future 56 Bond P&I - Future 57 Bond P&I - Future 58 Bond P&I - Future 59 Bond P&I - Future 60 Bond P&I - Future 61 Bond P&I - Future 62 Bond P&I - Future 63 Bond Prin - Existing 64 65 Beginning Cash 66 Add net operations (line 29) 67 Add back depreciation (line 26) 68 Add net non operating (line 42) 69 Add capital and bond (lines 47-60) 70 Net change in balance sheet items 71 72 Ending Cash 73 74 Ending net assets 75 76 Target Operating Reserve 77 10% of Accumulated Depreciation 78 Target minimum working capital 79 Actual working capital-cash balance 80 Over (Under) target working capital Water Fund Budget Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%2.00%2.00%2.00% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50%3.50% Actual Projected (8,663,639)(7,448,138)(113,171)(2,105,950)(2,136,594)(1,360,783)(855,425)(1,879,635)(7,145,913)(1,648,711)(1,080,380)(1,772,297)(2,842,354)(1,918,397) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,231,246 1,867,079 0 3,636,427 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,600,000 5,231,246 1,867,080 0 966,645 0 0 0 0 6,200,000 0 0 0 1,700,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334) (749,259)(749,259)(749,259)(749,259)(749,259) (122,372)(122,372)(122,372)(122,372) 0 0 0 (146,846)(146,846) (208,032) (895,000)(1,312,500)(1,787,500)(1,983,935)(2,045,846)(2,005,367)(1,792,502)(1,575,000)(1,620,000)(1,080,000)(1,350,000)(1,395,000)(1,440,000)(2,950,000) 10,804,267 12,278,374 9,573,902 6,266,795 8,173,222 6,157,807 6,031,941 5,742,139 5,886,540 5,961,568 6,375,565 6,228,569 6,864,608 7,038,685 (646,435)(655,710)(2,255,018)(1,277,987)(819,480)(695,946)(560,555)(416,295)(264,931)(102,268)70,560 254,131 449,058 655,520 1,669,757 1,607,497 1,955,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 2,275,887 671,517 1,870,320 1,370,915 395,340 710,617 660,343 759,128 855,779 865,655 954,016 1,044,238 1,180,617 1,285,633 1,362,313 903,853 (5,026,479)(1,900,671)513,188 (4,182,440)(2,366,150)(2,764,262)(2,570,970)(2,801,582)(2,713,638)(3,537,680)(3,074,597)(3,836,500)(4,730,575) (1,124,585)(500,100)(921,486)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,278,374 9,573,902 7,823,529 8,173,222 6,157,807 6,031,941 5,742,139 5,886,540 5,961,568 6,375,565 6,228,569 6,864,608 7,038,685 6,601,831 33,528,323 34,742,933 33,858,830 32,149,803 32,040,940 32,005,337 32,203,909 32,643,394 33,244,117 34,095,865 35,210,663 36,645,411 38,380,101 40,397,935 946,659 1,078,510 1,615,463 1,050,550 1,068,950 1,098,956 1,129,820 1,161,568 1,194,226 1,227,820 1,262,377 1,297,925 1,334,493 1,372,110 2,422,935 2,569,229 2,764,818 2,952,333 3,179,921 3,407,510 3,635,099 3,862,688 4,090,276 4,317,865 4,545,454 4,773,042 5,000,631 5,228,220 3,369,594 3,647,739 4,380,281 4,002,883 4,248,871 4,506,466 4,764,919 5,024,256 5,284,502 5,545,685 5,807,830 6,070,967 6,335,124 6,600,330 12,278,374 9,573,902 7,823,529 8,173,222 6,157,807 6,031,941 5,742,139 5,886,540 5,961,568 6,375,565 6,228,569 6,864,608 7,038,685 6,601,831 8,908,780 5,926,163 3,443,248 4,170,339 1,908,935 1,525,476 977,220 862,284 677,066 829,880 420,739 793,641 703,562 1,501 12/8/2020 Page 2 - Cashflow City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study 1 Rates Inflation 2 Revenue growth assumption - non-usage 3 Investment income yield 4 Expense growth - general and admin 5 Expense growth - contractual 6 Expense growth - non personnel 7 Connection fee increase 8 MCES rate increase 9 10 Beginning net assets 11 12 Operating Revenues 13 Water Sales 14 Sewer Charges 15 Storm Sewer Charges 16 Penalties and other 17 Intergovernmental 19 Total Operating Revenues 20 21 Operating Expenses 22 Personal services 23 Materials and supplies 24 MCES 25 Other contractual services 26 Repairs and maintenance 27 Depreciation 28 Total Operating Expenses 29 30 Net Operations 31 Non operating revenues (expenses) 32 Investment income 33 Connection charges 34 Intergovernmental 35 Refunds and reimbursements 36 Interest and fiscal charges 37 Gain (loss) on disposal of Capital assets 38 Transfers in 39 Transfers out 40 Contributions of Capital assets 41 Special assessments 42 Total non operating revenue (expenses) 43 Prior period adjustment 44 Net increase (decrease) in resources 45 46 Ending net assets Sewer Fund Budget Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25% 4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00% 5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00% 18,483,441 17,980,652 18,008,680 18,143,625 17,829,969 17,542,227 17,118,947 16,733,061 16,387,505 16,083,956 15,846,727 15,745,834 15,722,426 15,811,356 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,699,906 2,950,883 3,067,469 3,000,000 3,394,827 3,576,450 3,776,441 3,988,230 4,224,886 4,475,230 4,740,269 5,021,863 5,317,737 5,630,897 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64,576 82,639 76,489 67,000 70,000 71,400 72,828 74,285 75,771 77,286 78,832 80,409 82,017 83,657 0 0 206,353 2,764,482 3,033,522 3,350,311 3,067,000 3,464,827 3,647,850 3,849,269 4,062,515 4,300,657 4,552,516 4,819,101 5,102,272 5,399,754 5,714,554 467,003 492,693 494,444 534,700 532,700 554,008 576,168 599,215 623,184 648,111 674,035 700,997 729,037 758,198 39,730 36,976 25,603 40,800 40,300 41,106 41,928 42,767 43,622 44,494 45,384 46,292 47,218 48,162 1,564,754 1,830,942 1,904,789 2,071,854 2,463,500 2,586,675 2,716,009 2,851,809 2,994,400 3,144,120 3,301,326 3,466,392 3,639,711 3,821,697 516,408 604,538 397,901 186,100 186,900 192,507 198,282 204,231 210,358 216,668 223,168 229,863 236,759 243,862 137,187 123,268 101,492 132,500 133,500 137,505 141,630 145,879 150,255 154,763 159,406 164,188 169,114 174,187 1,016,753 978,700 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 3,741,835 4,067,117 3,875,771 3,917,496 4,308,442 4,463,343 4,625,560 4,795,443 4,973,360 5,159,699 5,354,862 5,559,274 5,773,381 5,997,649 (977,353)(1,033,595)(525,460)(850,496)(843,615)(815,493)(776,290)(732,927)(672,704)(607,182)(535,760)(457,003)(373,627)(283,095) 39,219 83,552 218,757 40,000 81,568 70,370 65,783 60,427 61,974 60,822 60,663 59,320 59,155 59,454 301,986 742,756 438,417 500,000 500,000 338,844 338,844 338,844 317,206 317,206 317,206 317,206 317,206 317,206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 192 685 324 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5,045)(4,435)(3,810)(3,161)(25,695)(17,001)(14,223)(11,900)(10,025)(8,075)(6,050)(3,950)(2,200)(1,500) 0 (45,968)3,499 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (223,074)(21,742)(258,810)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 361,286 269,507 261,894 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 268 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63,049 61,018 88,397 93,885 474,564 1,061,623 660,405 536,840 555,873 392,213 390,404 387,371 369,155 369,953 434,868 433,595 462,557 469,045 (502,789)28,028 134,945 (313,657)(287,742)(423,280)(385,886)(345,556)(303,549)(237,229)(100,893)(23,408)88,930 185,950 17,980,652 18,008,680 18,143,625 17,829,969 17,542,227 17,118,947 16,733,061 16,387,505 16,083,956 15,846,727 15,745,834 15,722,426 15,811,356 15,997,305 Actual Projected 12/8/2020 Page 3 - Cashflow City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study 1 Rates Inflation 2 Revenue growth assumption - non-usage 3 Investment income yield 4 Expense growth - general and admin 5 Expense growth - contractual 6 Expense growth - non personnel 7 Connection fee increase 8 MCES rate increase 9 47 CIP Funding 48 Purchase of Capital Assets 49 Proceeds from internal borrowing 50 Bond Proceeds - Operating Projects 51 Bond Proceeds - Connection Projects 52 Bond P&I - Future 53 Bond P&I - Future 54 Bond P&I - Future 55 Bond P&I - Future 56 Bond P&I - Future 57 Bond P&I - Future 58 Bond P&I - Future 59 Bond P&I - Future 60 Bond P&I - Future 61 Bond P&I - Future 62 Bond P&I - Future 63 Bond Prin - Existing 64 65 Beginning Cash 66 Add net operations (line 29) 67 Add back depreciation (line 26) 68 Add net non operating (line 42) 69 Add capital and bond (lines 47-60) 70 Net change in balance sheet items 71 72 Ending Cash 73 74 Ending net assets 75 76 Target Operating Reserve 77 10% of Accumulated Depreciation 78 Target minimum working capital 79 Actual working capital-cash balance 80 Over (Under) target working capital Sewer Fund Budget Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35%5.35% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25% 4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00%4.00% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00% 5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00%5.00% Actual Projected (24,082)112,682 (210,611)(1,058,450)(1,434,594)(770,229)(1,866,678)(1,302,895)(2,984,961)(809,804)(1,550,168)(974,421)(939,386)(1,550,168) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 550,000 700,000 1,300,000 900,000 900,000 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334) (120,848)(120,848)(120,848)(120,848)(120,848)(120,848) (312,049)(312,049)(312,049)(312,049)(110,962) (85,660)(85,660)(85,660)(85,660) (159,084)(159,084)(159,084) (110,135)(110,135) (110,135) (60,000)(62,500)(62,500)(62,500)(125,000)(125,000)(127,500)(60,000)(65,000)(65,000)(70,000)(70,000)(70,000)(150,000) 5,031,128 4,971,583 5,686,989 6,308,496 6,525,432 5,629,638 5,262,671 4,834,149 4,957,906 4,865,756 4,853,034 4,745,624 4,732,362 4,756,339 (977,353)(1,033,595)(525,460)(850,496)(843,615)(815,493)(776,290)(732,927)(672,704)(607,182)(535,760)(457,003)(373,627)(283,095) 1,016,753 978,700 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 951,542 474,564 1,061,623 660,405 536,840 555,873 392,213 390,404 387,371 369,155 369,953 434,868 433,595 462,557 469,045 (84,082)50,182 (273,111)(420,950)(1,559,594)(895,229)(994,178)(482,229)(740,143)(727,035)(958,059)(941,396)(1,016,496)(1,016,325) (489,427)(341,504)(191,869)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,971,583 5,686,989 6,308,496 6,525,432 5,629,638 5,262,671 4,834,149 4,957,906 4,865,756 4,853,034 4,745,624 4,732,362 4,756,339 4,877,505 17,980,652 18,008,680 18,143,625 17,829,969 17,542,227 17,118,947 16,733,061 16,387,505 16,083,956 15,846,727 15,745,834 15,722,426 15,811,356 15,997,305 2,043,812 2,316,313 2,193,172 2,224,466 2,517,675 2,633,851 2,755,513 2,882,925 3,016,364 3,156,117 3,302,490 3,455,799 3,616,379 3,784,580 2,026,549 2,114,834 2,209,988 2,305,142 2,400,297 2,495,451 2,590,605 2,685,759 2,780,913 2,876,068 2,971,222 3,066,376 3,161,530 3,256,684 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,080,000 4,161,600 4,244,832 4,329,729 4,416,323 4,504,650 4,594,743 4,686,638 4,780,370 4,971,583 5,686,989 6,308,496 6,525,432 5,629,638 5,262,671 4,834,149 4,957,906 4,865,756 4,853,034 4,745,624 4,732,362 4,756,339 4,877,505 971,583 1,686,989 2,308,496 2,525,432 1,629,638 1,182,671 672,549 713,074 536,028 436,711 240,975 137,619 69,701 97,135 12/8/2020 Page 4 - Cashflow City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study 1 Rates Inflation 2 Revenue growth assumption - non-usage 3 Investment income yield 4 Expense growth - general and admin 5 Expense growth - contractual 6 Expense growth - non personnel 7 Connection fee increase 8 MCES rate increase 9 10 Beginning net assets 11 12 Operating Revenues 13 Water Sales 14 Sewer Charges 15 Storm Sewer Charges 16 Penalties and other 17 Intergovernmental 19 Total Operating Revenues 20 21 Operating Expenses 22 Personal services 23 Materials and supplies 24 MCES 25 Other contractual services 26 Repairs and maintenance 27 Depreciation 28 Total Operating Expenses 29 30 Net Operations 31 Non operating revenues (expenses) 32 Investment income 33 Connection charges 34 Intergovernmental 35 Refunds and reimbursements 36 Interest and fiscal charges 37 Gain (loss) on disposal of Capital assets 38 Transfers in 39 Transfers out 40 Contributions of Capital assets 41 Special assessments 42 Total non operating revenue (expenses) 43 Prior period adjustment 44 Net increase (decrease) in resources 45 46 Ending net assets Storm Water Fund Budget Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 36.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 16,008,609 15,829,446 15,786,052 16,024,686 15,676,515 15,639,045 15,698,105 15,819,914 16,023,998 16,307,607 16,704,000 17,257,000 17,909,437 18,697,898 693,552 748,618 978,585 1,030,000 1,400,800 1,484,848 1,573,939 1,668,375 1,768,478 1,874,586 1,987,062 2,106,285 2,232,662 2,366,622 15,906 16,151 20,185 16,300 17,300 17,646 17,999 18,359 18,726 19,101 19,483 19,873 20,270 20,675 0 0 221,924 709,458 764,769 1,220,694 1,046,300 1,418,100 1,502,494 1,591,938 1,686,734 1,787,204 1,893,687 2,006,545 2,126,158 2,252,932 2,387,297 272,452 335,178 280,571 363,400 391,100 402,833 414,918 427,366 440,186 453,392 466,994 481,004 495,434 510,297 18,586 39,435 27,612 63,000 56,800 57,936 59,095 60,277 61,482 62,712 63,966 65,245 66,550 67,881 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344,814 334,461 691,110 245,000 287,500 296,125 305,009 314,159 323,584 333,291 343,290 353,589 364,196 375,122 2,407 614 614 600 21,800 22,454 23,128 23,821 24,536 25,272 26,030 26,811 27,616 28,444 900,209 873,535 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 1,538,468 1,583,223 1,918,378 1,590,471 1,675,671 1,697,819 1,720,620 1,744,094 1,768,260 1,793,138 1,818,751 1,845,120 1,872,267 1,900,215 (829,010)(818,454)(697,684)(544,171)(257,571)(195,325)(128,682)(57,359)18,944 100,549 187,793 281,038 380,665 487,082 11,577 20,437 48,739 10,000 27,145 20,388 23,289 21,370 21,548 23,384 23,018 22,210 22,647 23,197 104,265 172,844 758,822 150,000 200,000 225,972 215,727 225,073 224,442 249,960 252,741 257,795 262,951 268,210 36,331 44,604 30,000 36,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 38,000 50 161 2,355 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (45,044)(29,975)(26,525)(23,000)(19,325)(15,500)(11,600)(7,625)(4,200)(1,400) 0 (51,252)36,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79,912 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (392,953)(236,238)(469,451)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 890,577 744,592 529,353 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63,049 61,018 88,397 91,049 649,847 775,060 936,318 196,000 220,101 254,385 250,491 261,443 264,665 295,844 365,207 371,398 407,796 419,056 (179,163)(43,394)238,634 (348,171)(37,470)59,060 121,809 204,084 283,609 396,393 553,000 652,436 788,461 906,138 15,829,446 15,786,052 16,024,686 15,676,515 15,639,045 15,698,105 15,819,914 16,023,998 16,307,607 16,704,000 17,257,000 17,909,437 18,697,898 19,604,035 ProjectedActual 12/8/2020 Page 5 - Cashflow City of Chanhassen, MN Utility Rate Study 1 Rates Inflation 2 Revenue growth assumption - non-usage 3 Investment income yield 4 Expense growth - general and admin 5 Expense growth - contractual 6 Expense growth - non personnel 7 Connection fee increase 8 MCES rate increase 9 47 CIP Funding 48 Purchase of Capital Assets 49 Proceeds from internal borrowing 50 Bond Proceeds - Operating Projects 51 Bond Proceeds - Connection Projects 52 Bond P&I - Future 53 Bond P&I - Future 54 Bond P&I - Future 55 Bond P&I - Future 56 Bond P&I - Future 57 Bond P&I - Future 58 Bond P&I - Future 59 Bond P&I - Future 60 Bond P&I - Future 61 Bond P&I - Future 62 Bond P&I - Future 63 Bond Prin - Existing 64 65 Beginning Cash 66 Add net operations (line 29) 67 Add back depreciation (line 26) 68 Add net non operating (line 42) 69 Add capital and bond (lines 47-60) 70 Net change in balance sheet items 71 72 Ending Cash 73 74 Ending net assets 75 76 Target Operating Reserve 77 10% of Accumulated Depreciation 78 Target minimum working capital 79 Actual working capital-cash balance 80 Over (Under) target working capital Storm Water Fund Budget Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 36.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00%6.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25%1.25% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00%3.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% 2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00%2.00% ProjectedActual (55,648)(222,064)(445,010)(602,450)(1,306,569)(1,630,480)(1,962,460)(1,754,168)(1,576,685)(1,739,814)(1,809,406)(1,881,782)(1,957,054)(1,809,406) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,351,175 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335)(116,335) (117,830)(117,830)(117,830)(117,830)(117,830)(117,830)(117,830) (119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334)(119,334) (120,848)(120,848)(120,848)(120,848)(120,848) (122,372)(122,372)(122,372)(160,278) (122,372)(122,372)(122,372) (146,846)(146,846) (159,084) 0 0 0 0 (115,000)(115,000)(115,000)(120,000)(125,000)(130,000)(130,000)(135,000)(140,000)(140,000) 1,380,288 1,259,125 1,128,485 852,598 2,171,623 1,631,055 1,863,107 1,709,591 1,723,814 1,870,711 1,841,415 1,776,761 1,811,795 1,855,736 (829,010)(818,454)(697,684)(544,171)(257,571)(195,325)(128,682)(57,359)18,944 100,549 187,793 281,038 380,665 487,082 900,209 873,535 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 918,471 649,847 775,060 406,965 196,000 220,101 254,385 250,491 261,443 264,665 295,844 365,207 371,398 407,796 419,056 (55,648)(222,064)(445,010)748,725 (1,421,569)(745,480)(1,193,795)(1,108,332)(1,055,183)(1,344,160)(1,536,125)(1,535,873)(1,662,991)(1,712,333) (786,561)(738,717)(458,629)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,259,125 1,128,485 852,598 2,171,623 1,631,055 1,863,107 1,709,591 1,723,814 1,870,711 1,841,415 1,776,761 1,811,795 1,855,736 1,968,012 15,829,446 15,786,052 16,024,686 15,676,515 15,639,045 15,698,105 15,819,914 16,023,998 16,307,607 16,704,000 17,257,000 17,909,437 18,697,898 19,604,035 1,040,000 1,081,600 1,124,864 1,169,859 1,216,653 389,674 401,075 412,811 424,894 437,334 450,140 463,325 476,898 490,872 144,975 257,860 377,164 497,823 619,847 738,319 861,716 1,010,137 1,204,327 1,040,000 1,081,600 1,124,864 1,169,859 1,216,653 534,649 658,934 789,976 922,718 1,057,180 1,188,459 1,325,040 1,487,035 1,695,199 1,259,125 1,128,485 852,598 2,171,623 1,631,055 1,863,107 1,709,591 1,723,814 1,870,711 1,841,415 1,776,761 1,811,795 1,855,736 1,968,012 219,125 46,885 (272,266)1,001,764 414,402 1,328,458 1,050,657 933,838 947,993 784,234 588,302 486,755 368,701 272,813 12/8/2020 Page 6 - Cashflow CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Review of Claims Paid 12142020 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.1. Prepared By Kelly Strey, Interim Finance Director File No: SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on December 14, 2020: Check Numbers Amounts 174486 – 174633 $2,192,152.11 ACH Payments $1,512,857.59 Total All Claims $3,705,009.70 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 12/7/2020 12:25 PM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount UB*02094 @TITLE LLC 11/19/2020 0.00 8.46174486 ABCCLE ABC Cleaning, LLC 11/19/2020 0.00 290.00174487 BAUBUI Bauer Built Inc 11/19/2020 0.00 1,209.60174488 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 11/19/2020 0.00 13.38174489 BOYSCO BOY SCOUT TROOP 330 11/19/2020 0.00 290.00174490 UB*02070 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 50.54174491 UB*02077 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 11.16174492 UB*02080 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 12.48174493 UB*02091 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 16.58174494 UB*02095 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 252.89174495 UB*02097 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 145.49174496 UB*02068 LESLIE & JOHN CADLE 11/19/2020 0.00 381.45174497 UB*02074 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 11/19/2020 0.00 30.02174498 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 0.00 3,879.82174499 ChaHer Chaska Herald 11/19/2020 0.00 48.00174500 UB*02100 MATT & MARGARET CRONIN 11/19/2020 0.00 7.04174501 UB*02101 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS 11/19/2020 0.00 25.16174502 DELTOO DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 11/19/2020 0.00 65.64174503 DEMCON DEM-CON LANDFILL 11/19/2020 0.00 2,110.84174504 UB*02069 NGA DOAN 11/19/2020 0.00 99.63174505 UB*02079 EDINA REALTY TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 49.55174506 EGACOM EGAN COMPANY 11/19/2020 0.00 3,665.32174507 EHLERS EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 11/19/2020 0.00 6,883.75174508 EriKim Kimberly Erickson 11/19/2020 0.00 150.00174509 UB*02075 ESQIRE TITLE SERVICES 11/19/2020 0.00 45.37174510 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/19/2020 0.00 5,396.41174511 UB*02072 CHRISTOPHER & PAIGE GILES 11/19/2020 0.00 78.14174512 UB*02084 CHARLES & ELAINE HANSON 11/19/2020 0.00 357.43174513 HeaPar HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 0.00 50,079.16174514 Hortal Horizon Talent Agency 11/19/2020 0.00 500.00174515 IMOCON IMO Consulting Group Inc 11/19/2020 0.00 1,295.00174516 IndSig Indigo Signs 11/19/2020 0.00 379.00174517 KenAsh Ashley Kennedy 11/19/2020 0.00 150.00174518 KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 11/19/2020 0.00 3,004.50174519 UB*02085 LAURI ANN & PETE KLEIN 11/19/2020 0.00 214.41174520 LasSte Stephanie Lasley 11/19/2020 0.00 125.00174521 UB*02098 LEGACY TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 26.82174522 LubbDonn Donna Lubbers 11/19/2020 0.00 90.00174523 UB*02092 JENNIFER & MICAH MAATMAN 11/19/2020 0.00 53.33174524 UB*02078 ROBERT AND JESSICA MCCANDLESS 11/19/2020 0.00 36.30174525 UB*02076 FRANCIS MCGINN 11/19/2020 0.00 22.46174526 MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 11/19/2020 0.00 49.63174527 MILWIN Milbank Winwater Works 11/19/2020 0.00 2,932.05174528 MNSaf Minnesota Safety Council 11/19/2020 0.00 600.00174529 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 11/19/2020 0.00 20,642.00174530 NOVSOL NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 11/19/2020 0.00 9,121.21174531 UB*02087 ALLEN & BARBARA OLSON 11/19/2020 0.00 61.73174532 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (12/7/2020 12:25 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount UB*02096 RESULTS TITLE 11/19/2020 0.00 190.22174533 UB*02073 GARY & JANET RZONCA 11/19/2020 0.00 86.56174534 UB*02086 SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACY TITLE CO 11/19/2020 0.00 185.22174535 SCOTRE SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 11/19/2020 0.00 350.00174536 SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 11/19/2020 0.00 80.57174537 SMHEN SM HENTGES & SONS 11/19/2020 0.00 1,621,788.68174538 UB*02099 NANCY ST CROIX 11/19/2020 0.00 13.16174539 UB*02081 THE KINGSTON SPURBECK REVOCABLE TRUST11/19/2020 0.00 22.03174540 UB*02089 TITLE MARK LLC 11/19/2020 0.00 63.58174541 UB*02088 TITLE SMART INC 11/19/2020 0.00 38.09174542 UB*02082 NANCY VAN EPS VAN EPS 11/19/2020 0.00 166.69174543 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 0.00 1,184.43174544 UB*02090 ROGER & LEANNA WATCHHORN 11/19/2020 0.00 45.96174545 UB*02093 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 11/19/2020 0.00 117.73174546 UB*02083 JODY & TONY WEINZETL 11/19/2020 0.00 470.60174547 WINGRICH RICHARD WING 11/19/2020 0.00 100.00174548 UB*02071 RICK & CYNTHIA YOKIEL 11/19/2020 0.00 5.76174549 ACIAsp ACI Asphalt & Concrete, Inc 11/25/2020 0.00 721.50174564 APAGRO APACHE GROUP 11/25/2020 0.00 947.08174565 BraKyl Kyle Brazil 11/25/2020 0.00 290.03174566 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/25/2020 0.00 28.26174567 CenLin CenturyLink 11/25/2020 0.00 60.58174568 COMASP Commercial Asphalt Co 11/25/2020 0.00 365.77174569 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 11/25/2020 0.00 3,127.74174570 EXCFIR EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 11/25/2020 0.00 18,300.00174571 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/25/2020 0.00 46.17174572 FirSta First State Tire Recycling 11/25/2020 0.00 263.10174573 FreJak Jake Freeland 11/25/2020 0.00 50.00174574 GOGYMN Go Gymnastics 11/25/2020 0.00 646.80174575 gonhom GONYEA HOMES 11/25/2020 0.00 2,500.00174576 GRABAR GRAYBAR 11/25/2020 0.00 52.76174577 hach Hach Company 11/25/2020 0.00 23.90174578 KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 11/25/2020 0.00 676.00174579 LawPro Lawson Products, Inc.11/25/2020 0.00 70.02174580 LENCHE LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 11/25/2020 0.00 1,353.36174581 MBEInc MBE Inc 11/25/2020 0.00 1,488.00174582 MINAQU MINNETONKA AQUATICS, ISD 276 11/25/2020 0.00 33,304.00174583 OliMar Marion Olin 11/25/2020 0.00 28.00174584 PatDia Diane Patnode 11/25/2020 0.00 56.00174585 RoaDer Derek Roach 11/25/2020 0.00 35.00174586 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 11/25/2020 0.00 3,221.44174587 StrGov Strategic Government Resources Inc 11/25/2020 0.00 9,411.67174588 SUMFIR SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 11/25/2020 0.00 1,300.00174589 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/25/2020 0.00 750.40174590 zioinv Zion Investments LLC 11/25/2020 0.00 95,289.00174591 POST POSTMASTER 11/30/2020 0.00 632.50174592 4pawsAn 4 Paws Animal Control 12/03/2020 0.00 525.00174595 achea AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 12/03/2020 0.00 1,110.00174596 AleMar Mary Alejo 12/03/2020 0.00 100.00174597 ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 12/03/2020 0.00 490.84174598 ARAMAR ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 12/03/2020 0.00 747.60174599 BCATRA BCA 12/03/2020 0.00 15.00174600 BurkChar Charlie Burke 12/03/2020 0.00 135.95174601 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 0.00 1,906.72174602 DPCIND DPC Industries, Inc 12/03/2020 0.00 6,385.35174603 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/03/2020 0.00 468.06174604 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 12/03/2020 0.00 5,684.50174605 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (12/7/2020 12:25 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Loc49 IUOE Local #49 12/03/2020 0.00 700.00174606 JorNic Nick Jorgenson 12/03/2020 0.00 164.99174607 JudDav Dave & Holly Judd 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174608 KirFir KIRVIDA FIRE, INC 12/03/2020 0.00 832.00174609 KreBri Brittany Kreft 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174610 L&RSub L & R Suburban Landscaping 12/03/2020 0.00 500.00174611 MBBCon MBB Construction Services Inc 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174612 MBEInc MBE Inc 12/03/2020 0.00 240.00174613 MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 12/03/2020 0.00 61.55174614 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 12/03/2020 0.00 247,066.00174615 MNTRAN MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 12/03/2020 0.00 2,306.40174616 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/03/2020 0.00 80.00174617 MTIDIS MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 12/03/2020 0.00 1,014.16174618 POST POSTMASTER 12/03/2020 0.00 114.00174619 POST POSTMASTER 12/03/2020 0.00 114.00174620 PratChri Chris Pratley 12/03/2020 0.00 24.99174621 RadDan Daniel Rademacher 12/03/2020 0.00 240.00174622 RodBri Brian Rodenz 12/03/2020 0.00 100.00174623 SchTom Tom Scherber 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174624 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 12/03/2020 0.00 194.84174625 SMHEN SM HENTGES & SONS 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174626 SmuPhi Philip & Valerie Smuda 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174627 SUMFIR SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 12/03/2020 0.00 1,590.00174628 SunDea Dean & Marie Sund 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174629 SUPLAW SUPERIOR LAWN & LANDSCAPE 12/03/2020 0.00 1,000.00174630 TenRic Richard Tennyson 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174631 TheHart The Hartford 12/03/2020 0.00 1,085.05174632 TWOTEA TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 12/03/2020 0.00 250.00174633 Report Total (132 checks): 2,192,152.11 0.00 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (12/7/2020 12:25 PM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User:dwashburn Printed: 12/8/2020 9:35 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-A&JOut A&J Outdoor Power LLC 11/17/2020 0.00 224.49 ACH z-a1secu A1 Security Camera LLC 11/17/2020 0.00 225.28 ACH z-adobe Adobe 11/17/2020 0.00 161.05 ACH Z-ASAP Advanced Service and Parts LLC 11/17/2020 0.00 253.25 ACH Z-Amazon Amazon 11/17/2020 0.00 12,005.45 ACH Z-amepla American Planning Association 11/17/2020 0.00 200.00 ACH Z-AMEPUB American Public Works Association 11/17/2020 0.00 21.49 ACH Z-APPLE Apple.com 11/17/2020 0.00 1.98 ACH z-BalSup Baldwin Supply Company 11/17/2020 0.00 103.98 ACH Z-BATPLU Batteries Plus 11/17/2020 0.00 39.77 ACH Z-CARHAR Carhartt 11/17/2020 0.00 234.97 ACH Z-CDWG CDW Government 11/17/2020 0.00 -2,122.61 ACH z-corfee Corporate Card Annual Fee 11/17/2020 0.00 24.00 ACH Z-CubFoo Cub Foods 11/17/2020 0.00 63.63 ACH Z-DAVANN Davanni's 11/17/2020 0.00 346.54 ACH Z-Dell Dell 11/17/2020 0.00 -1,083.05 ACH z-doltre Dollar Tree Stores Inc 11/17/2020 0.00 91.70 ACH Z-EDDBAU Eddie Bauer 11/17/2020 0.00 105.98 ACH z-encyr Encyrptomatic LLC 11/17/2020 0.00 21.46 ACH Z-FASTEN Fastenal Company 11/17/2020 0.00 49.69 ACH Z-FEDEX FedEx Office 11/17/2020 0.00 35.41 ACH Z-FILFAS Filters Fast 11/17/2020 0.00 103.99 ACH z-flefar Fleet Farm 11/17/2020 0.00 131.97 ACH z-FraPla Franklin Planner 11/17/2020 0.00 38.80 ACH Z-Funer Funeral Flowers/Gifts 11/17/2020 0.00 75.10 ACH z-gloind Global Industrial Solutions 11/17/2020 0.00 877.19 ACH Z-GFOA Government Finance Officers Association 11/17/2020 0.00 0.00 ACH z-grain Grainger 11/17/2020 0.00 48.57 ACH Z-HACCOM Hach Company 11/17/2020 0.00 1,155.87 ACH Z-HOMDEP Home Depot 11/17/2020 0.00 310.78 ACH z-iqpro IQ Products 11/17/2020 0.00 48.45 ACH Z-JJKel J.J. Keller & Associates Inc 11/17/2020 0.00 25.65 ACH Z-jimjoh Jimmy Johns 11/17/2020 0.00 175.06 ACH Z-klog K-Log, Inc 11/17/2020 0.00 11,873.20 ACH Z-KOHLS Kohls 11/17/2020 0.00 159.97 ACH Z-lunbye Lunds & Byerly's 11/17/2020 0.00 75.55 ACH Z-mcdona McDonald's 11/17/2020 0.00 53.47 ACH z-mclpar McLean Parts 11/17/2020 0.00 224.00 ACH Z-MENARD Menards 11/17/2020 0.00 295.03 ACH Z-MERLIN Merlins Ace Hardware 11/17/2020 0.00 30.84 ACH z-HagMik Mike Hage Distinctive Concrete & Masonry 11/17/2020 0.00 1,050.00 ACH Z-MNPOLL MN Pollution Control Agency 11/17/2020 0.00 445.00 ACH z-myplu MyPlumbingTraining.com 11/17/2020 0.00 140.00 ACH Z-NAICS NAICS Association 11/17/2020 0.00 48.00 ACH z-newhor New Horizons Minnesota 11/17/2020 0.00 790.00 Page 1 of 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-offmax Office Max/Office Depot 11/17/2020 0.00 9.65 ACH z-OnUpSi Once Upon a Sign & Printing 11/17/2020 0.00 107.53 ACH Z-PAIGEA Painters Gear Inc 11/17/2020 0.00 411.11 ACH z-parcit Party City 11/17/2020 0.00 46.45 ACH Z-PAYPAL PayPal 11/17/2020 0.00 286.26 ACH z-quill Quill Corporation 11/17/2020 0.00 38.97 ACH Z-SAFSIG Safetysign.com 11/17/2020 0.00 38.74 ACH z-setide Seton Indentification Products 11/17/2020 0.00 22.36 ACH Z-shafil ShareFile 11/17/2020 0.00 565.33 ACH Z-SMASIG SmartSign 11/17/2020 0.00 33.75 ACH Z-SPRWAR Sprinkler Warehouse 11/17/2020 0.00 1,403.37 ACH Z-steric Stericycle Inc 11/17/2020 0.00 184.48 ACH Z-target Target 11/17/2020 0.00 99.21 ACH Z-THEMUS The Mustard Seed 11/17/2020 0.00 41.33 ACH Z-urblan Urban Land Institute 11/17/2020 0.00 440.00 ACH Z-USABLU USABlueBook 11/17/2020 0.00 505.01 ACH Z-VisPri Vista Print 11/17/2020 0.00 301.04 ACH z-WerEle Werner Electric 11/17/2020 0.00 -5.00 ACH z-wessub West Suburban Innovative Storage 11/17/2020 0.00 1,599.20 ACH z-workbo Workboots.com 11/17/2020 0.00 68.98 ACH z-zoom Zoom 11/17/2020 0.00 85.90 ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 11/19/2020 0.00 270.00 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/19/2020 0.00 21,179.92 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 0.00 5,840.72 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 11/19/2020 0.00 298.77 ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 11/19/2020 0.00 1,979.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/19/2020 0.00 181.44 ACH JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 11/19/2020 0.00 40.05 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 11/19/2020 0.00 367.50 ACH BENSKAYE KAYE L BENSON 11/19/2020 0.00 616.00 ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 11/19/2020 0.00 12,300.75 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 11/19/2020 0.00 7,587.98 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/19/2020 0.00 247.01 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/19/2020 0.00 16.27 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 11/19/2020 0.00 8,253.70 ACH PRALAW PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 11/19/2020 0.00 24.91 ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 11/19/2020 0.00 7,266.10 ACH Spring Springbrook 11/19/2020 0.00 47,479.55 ACH SRFCON SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 11/19/2020 0.00 2,628.36 ACH STRGUA STRATOGUARD LLC 11/19/2020 0.00 176.00 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 11/19/2020 0.00 30.40 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 11/19/2020 0.00 875.28 ACH A1ELE A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 11/25/2020 0.00 125.92 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 11/25/2020 0.00 39.78 ACH BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS 11/25/2020 0.00 65.85 ACH carcou Carver County 11/25/2020 0.00 1,096,892.90 ACH DelDen Delta Dental 11/25/2020 0.00 2,577.10 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 11/25/2020 0.00 22.50 ACH Avesis Fidelity Security Life 11/25/2020 0.00 255.42 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/25/2020 0.00 139.96 ACH JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 11/25/2020 0.00 29.25 ACH MausKerr Kerry Maus 11/25/2020 0.00 116.25 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/25/2020 0.00 80,243.33 ACH NorAmerS North American Safety, Inc. 11/25/2020 0.00 866.00 ACH NusEqu Nuss Truck & Equipment 11/25/2020 0.00 25.81 Page 2 of 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH PRALAW PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 11/25/2020 0.00 27.80 ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 11/25/2020 0.00 75.39 ACH ProTec Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 11/25/2020 0.00 164.50 ACH DaniReem Reem Danial 11/25/2020 0.00 238.00 ACH Southwes Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 11/25/2020 0.00 866.00 ACH SpeScr Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 11/25/2020 0.00 426.90 ACH SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 11/25/2020 0.00 103.44 ACH TBEI TBEI, Inc 11/25/2020 0.00 136.00 ACH WALROO WALKER ROOFING COMPANY INC 11/25/2020 0.00 36,261.12 ACH WarLit Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 11/25/2020 0.00 300.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 0.00 10,845.84 ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 12/03/2020 0.00 131.25 ACH BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS 12/03/2020 0.00 57.95 ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 12/03/2020 0.00 99.16 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 12/03/2020 0.00 220.00 ACH EMEAUT EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 12/03/2020 0.00 611.11 ACH ImaTre ImageTrend, Inc 12/03/2020 0.00 262.26 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/03/2020 0.00 127.24 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 12/03/2020 0.00 358.37 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergengy Group 12/03/2020 0.00 412.78 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/03/2020 0.00 330.33 ACH PlaFla Plant & Flanged Equipment Company 12/03/2020 0.00 322.15 ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 12/03/2020 0.00 47.74 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 0.00 1,483.25 ACH TBEI TBEI, Inc 12/03/2020 0.00 111,747.47 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 12/03/2020 0.00 30.40 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 0.00 4,350.32 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 12/03/2020 0.00 698.08 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/03/2020 0.00 2,128.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 0.00 5,470.34 Report Total:0.00 1,512,857.59 Page 3 of 3 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM Name Check Da Account Description Amount @TITLE LLC 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.53 @TITLE LLC 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.65 @TITLE LLC 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.28 @TITLE LLC 8.46 4 Paws Animal Control 12/03/2020 101-1260-4300 November 2020 525.00 4 Paws Animal Control 525.00 ABC Cleaning, LLC 11/19/2020 101-1170-4300 Cleaning Service 290.00 ABC Cleaning, LLC 290.00 AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 12/03/2020 101-1220-4530 Honeywell gas valve 560.00 AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 12/03/2020 101-1170-4510 Service Work 160.00 AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 12/03/2020 101-1220-4510 Service Work 390.00 AC & HEATING BY GEORGE 1,110.00 ACI Asphalt & Concrete, Inc 11/25/2020 420-4224-4751 Murray Hill Project 721.50 ACI Asphalt & Concrete, Inc 721.50 Alejo Mary 12/03/2020 720-7204-4901 Waterwise rebate 100.00 Alejo Mary 100.00 ALLSTREAM 12/03/2020 101-1160-4300 Mitel Phone System Maintenance 490.84 ALLSTREAM 490.84 APACHE GROUP 11/25/2020 101-1170-4150 Supplies 947.08 APACHE GROUP 947.08 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 12/03/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 10.82 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 12/03/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 736.78 ARAMARK Refreshment Services, LLC 747.60 Bauer Built Inc 11/19/2020 101-1320-4140 Tires 1,209.60 Bauer Built Inc 1,209.60 BCA 12/03/2020 101-1120-4300 Background Investigation 15.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 1 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount BCA 15.00 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 11/19/2020 101-1170-4510 Wall Plates 13.38 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 13.38 BOY SCOUT TROOP 330 11/19/2020 101-1550-4300 Christmas Wreaths 290.00 BOY SCOUT TROOP 330 290.00 Brazil Kyle 11/25/2020 101-1550-4120 Safety Clothing 119.99 Brazil Kyle 11/25/2020 101-1550-4240 Clothing Allowance 170.04 Brazil Kyle 290.03 Burke Charlie 12/03/2020 101-1320-4240 Clothing Allowance 135.95 Burke Charlie 135.95 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.01 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 30.01 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.31 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.21 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.82 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.34 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.51 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.97 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.18 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.64 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.98 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.78 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 177.07 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 51.69 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 20.21 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.92 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 127.79 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.53 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.33 BURNET TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.84 BURNET TITLE 489.14 CADLE LESLIE & JOHN 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 349.63 CADLE LESLIE & JOHN 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.13 CADLE LESLIE & JOHN 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.50 CADLE LESLIE & JOHN 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.19 CADLE LESLIE & JOHN 381.45 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.16 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.71 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.31 CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.84 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 2 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CARVER COUNTY ABSTRACT 30.02 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/25/2020 605-6502-4300 Monthly Service 23.26 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly service 19.52 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly service 17.06 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 101-1370-4320 Monthly service 526.04 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly service 65.76 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly service 65.76 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 960.85 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 101-1190-4320 Monthly service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 700-7043-4320 Monthly service 711.99 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 101-1170-4320 Monthly service 434.14 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 700-7019-4320 Monthly service 252.73 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 9.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly service 23.21 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 101-1550-4320 Monthly service 151.72 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 9.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 101-1220-4320 Monthly service 369.40 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 101-1530-4320 Monthly service 98.63 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 101-1171-4320 Monthly service 38.01 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 11/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly service 32.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 3,908.08 CenturyLink 11/25/2020 700-7043-4310 Monthly Service 60.58 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1170-4310 Monthly Phone Service 911.87 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Phone Service 6.36 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Phone Service 6.36 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1550-4310 Monthly Phone Service 30.04 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1350-4310 Monthly Phone Service 30.04 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1220-4310 Monthly Phone Service 33.04 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1370-4310 Monthly Phone Service 50.88 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1160-4320 Monthly Phone Service 125.00 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1540-4310 Monthly Phone Service 95.40 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1190-4310 Monthly Phone Service 127.20 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Phone Service 15.13 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 700-7019-4310 Monthly Phone Service 210.28 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Phone Service 15.12 CENTURYLINK 12/03/2020 101-1160-4320 Monthly Phone Service 250.00 CENTURYLINK 1,967.30 Chaska Herald 11/19/2020 101-1120-4360 1 Year Subscription 48.00 Chaska Herald 48.00 Commercial Asphalt Co 11/25/2020 420-0000-4150 Materials 365.77 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 3 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Commercial Asphalt Co 365.77 CORE & MAIN LP 11/25/2020 700-0000-4550 Supplies 3,127.74 CORE & MAIN LP 3,127.74 CRONIN MATT & MARGARET 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.96 CRONIN MATT & MARGARET 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.20 CRONIN MATT & MARGARET 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.65 CRONIN MATT & MARGARET 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.23 CRONIN MATT & MARGARET 7.04 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 21.65 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.51 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS 25.16 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 11/19/2020 101-1370-4260 Tools 19.94 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 11/19/2020 101-1370-4260 Tools 45.70 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 65.64 DEM-CON LANDFILL 11/19/2020 101-1320-4150 Street Sweepings 2,110.84 DEM-CON LANDFILL 2,110.84 DOAN NGA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 41.85 DOAN NGA 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 44.66 DOAN NGA 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.17 DOAN NGA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.95 DOAN NGA 99.63 DPC Industries, Inc 12/03/2020 700-7019-4160 Chemicals 6,385.35 DPC Industries, Inc 6,385.35 EDINA REALTY TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.47 EDINA REALTY TITLE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 27.12 EDINA REALTY TITLE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.97 EDINA REALTY TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.99 EDINA REALTY TITLE 49.55 EGAN COMPANY 11/19/2020 700-7043-4530 Service 482.00 EGAN COMPANY 11/19/2020 700-7043-4530 Service 3,183.32 EGAN COMPANY 3,665.32 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 11/19/2020 700-0000-4300 2020 Utility Rate Study 2,294.58 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 11/19/2020 701-0000-4300 2020 Utility Rate Study 2,294.58 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 11/19/2020 720-0000-4300 2020 Utility Rate Study 2,294.59 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 6,883.75 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 4 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Erickson Kimberly 11/19/2020 720-7201-4300 Zero Waste Presentation 150.00 Erickson Kimberly 150.00 ESQIRE TITLE SERVICES 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.92 ESQIRE TITLE SERVICES 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 25.15 ESQIRE TITLE SERVICES 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 14.49 ESQIRE TITLE SERVICES 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.81 ESQIRE TITLE SERVICES 45.37 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 11/25/2020 101-1220-4070 Quarterly Operations 9,150.00 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 11/25/2020 101-1220-4070 Quarter 3 billing 9,150.00 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 18,300.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/03/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 91.61 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/03/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 91.61 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/03/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 91.61 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/03/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 91.61 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/03/2020 700-0000-4140 Supplies 101.62 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 468.06 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/25/2020 700-0000-4250 Materials 46.17 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/19/2020 700-0000-4550 Materials 741.76 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/19/2020 700-0000-4550 Materials 1,164.13 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/19/2020 700-0000-4250 Meters 4,500.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/19/2020 700-0000-4250 Meters 7,399.19 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/19/2020 701-0000-4551 Materials 789.09 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11/19/2020 700-0000-4250 Meters - Return -9,197.76 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 12/03/2020 700-0000-4250 Meters 4,500.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 12/03/2020 700-0000-4250 Meters 653.76 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 12/03/2020 700-0000-4550 Materials 94.80 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 12/03/2020 700-0000-4250 Materials 122.38 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 12/03/2020 700-0000-4250 Materials 313.56 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 11,127.08 First State Tire Recycling 11/25/2020 101-1320-4140 Tires 263.10 First State Tire Recycling 263.10 Freeland Jake 11/25/2020 101-1560-4300 Class 50.00 Freeland Jake 50.00 GILES CHRISTOPHER & PAIGE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 61.64 GILES CHRISTOPHER & PAIGE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.67 GILES CHRISTOPHER & PAIGE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.04 GILES CHRISTOPHER & PAIGE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.79 GILES CHRISTOPHER & PAIGE 78.14 Go Gymnastics 11/25/2020 101-1537-4300 Classes 323.40 Go Gymnastics 11/25/2020 101-1538-4300 Classes 323.40 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 5 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Go Gymnastics 646.80 GONYEA HOMES 11/25/2020 815-8226-2024 Permit 2017-01754 - 7590 Fawn Hill Road 2,500.00 GONYEA HOMES 2,500.00 GRAYBAR 11/25/2020 101-1550-4150 Supplies 132.00 GRAYBAR 11/25/2020 101-1350-4120 Return -640.13 GRAYBAR 11/25/2020 101-1350-4120 Supplies 436.81 GRAYBAR 11/25/2020 101-1350-4120 Supplies 124.08 GRAYBAR 52.76 Hach Company 11/25/2020 700-7043-4150 Supplies 23.90 Hach Company 23.90 HANSON CHARLES & ELAINE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 279.78 HANSON CHARLES & ELAINE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 49.31 HANSON CHARLES & ELAINE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 23.74 HANSON CHARLES & ELAINE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.60 HANSON CHARLES & ELAINE 357.43 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 101-0000-2012 December Insurance 21,821.09 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 101-0000-2012 December Insurance 1,582.10 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 210-0000-2012 December Insurance 296.64 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 700-0000-2012 December Insurance 3,559.74 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 701-0000-2012 December Insurance 3,559.74 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 720-0000-2012 December Insurance 1,613.75 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 101-1130-4040 December Insurance -296.66 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 700-0000-4040 December Insurance -39.55 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 701-0000-4040 December Insurance -39.55 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 720-0000-4040 December Insurance -19.78 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 101-0000-2012 December Insurance 12,534.20 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 101-0000-2012 December Insurance 1,266.08 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 210-0000-2012 December Insurance 474.78 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 700-0000-2012 December Insurance 2,029.69 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 701-0000-2012 December Insurance 1,080.13 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 720-0000-2012 December Insurance 973.30 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 101-1130-4040 December Insurance -118.70 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 101-1120-4040 December Insurance -118.70 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 700-0000-4040 December Insurance -31.66 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 701-0000-4040 December Insurance -31.66 HealthPartners, Inc.11/19/2020 720-0000-4040 December Insurance -15.82 HealthPartners, Inc. 50,079.16 Horizon Talent Agency 11/19/2020 101-1613-4300 2021 July 3 Street Dance 500.00 Horizon Talent Agency 500.00 IMO Consulting Group Inc 11/19/2020 700-7025-4300 Powers Blvd Watermain Loop 1,295.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 6 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount IMO Consulting Group Inc 1,295.00 Indigo Signs 11/19/2020 101-1550-4560 Lake Ann Sign 379.00 Indigo Signs 379.00 IUOE Local #49 12/03/2020 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 Local 49 dues 413.00 IUOE Local #49 12/03/2020 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 Local 49 dues 225.52 IUOE Local #49 12/03/2020 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 Local 49 dues 61.48 IUOE Local #49 700.00 Jorgenson Nick 12/03/2020 101-1250-4240 Boots 164.99 Jorgenson Nick 164.99 Judd Dave & Holly 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Erosion Control Escrow - Permit 2020-04103 250.00 Judd Dave & Holly 250.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 11/25/2020 300-0000-4300 Professional Services 676.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 11/19/2020 605-6502-4300 Legal Services 3,004.50 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 3,680.50 Kennedy Ashley 11/19/2020 720-7201-4300 Zero Waste Presentation 150.00 Kennedy Ashley 150.00 KIRVIDA FIRE, INC 12/03/2020 101-1220-4120 Supplies 832.00 KIRVIDA FIRE, INC 832.00 KLEIN LAURI ANN & PETE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 102.38 KLEIN LAURI ANN & PETE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 102.49 KLEIN LAURI ANN & PETE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.99 KLEIN LAURI ANN & PETE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.55 KLEIN LAURI ANN & PETE 214.41 Kreft Brittany 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Erosion Control Escrow - Permit 2020-02374 - 2240 Bentz Court 250.00 Kreft Brittany 250.00 L & R Suburban Landscaping 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-02319 7340 Kurvers Point Rd 500.00 L & R Suburban Landscaping 500.00 Lasley Stephanie 11/19/2020 101-1541-3634 Park refund 116.41 Lasley Stephanie 11/19/2020 101-0000-2021 Park refund 8.59 Lasley Stephanie 125.00 Lawson Products, Inc.11/25/2020 101-1370-4120 Supplies 70.02 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 7 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Lawson Products, Inc. 70.02 LEGACY TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.37 LEGACY TITLE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.31 LEGACY TITLE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.98 LEGACY TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.16 LEGACY TITLE 26.82 LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 11/25/2020 700-0000-4140 Supplies 1,353.36 LENZEN CHEVROLET BUICK 1,353.36 Lubbers Donna 11/19/2020 101-1531-3631 Room Rental refund 83.82 Lubbers Donna 11/19/2020 101-0000-2021 Room Rental refund 6.18 Lubbers Donna 90.00 MAATMAN JENNIFER & MICAH 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 25.04 MAATMAN JENNIFER & MICAH 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 23.18 MAATMAN JENNIFER & MICAH 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.29 MAATMAN JENNIFER & MICAH 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.82 MAATMAN JENNIFER & MICAH 53.33 MBB Construction Services Inc 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-01811 - 2450 Highover Way 250.00 MBB Construction Services Inc 250.00 MBE Inc 11/25/2020 720-7025-4150 Materials 784.00 MBE Inc 11/25/2020 720-7025-4150 Materials 704.00 MBE Inc 12/03/2020 720-7025-4290 Services 240.00 MBE Inc 1,728.00 MCCANDLESS ROBERT AND JESSICA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.19 MCCANDLESS ROBERT AND JESSICA 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 20.13 MCCANDLESS ROBERT AND JESSICA 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.70 MCCANDLESS ROBERT AND JESSICA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.28 MCCANDLESS ROBERT AND JESSICA 36.30 MCGINN FRANCIS 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.01 MCGINN FRANCIS 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.56 MCGINN FRANCIS 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.43 MCGINN FRANCIS 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.46 MCGINN FRANCIS 22.46 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 11/19/2020 101-1220-4130 Supplies 49.63 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 12/03/2020 101-1220-4130 Supplies 61.55 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 111.18 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 12/03/2020 701-7052-4751 Coop Agmt #19I014 247,066.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 8 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 247,066.00 Milbank Winwater Works 11/19/2020 700-0000-4250 Materials 2,932.05 Milbank Winwater Works 2,932.05 Minnesota Safety Council 11/19/2020 101-1560-4300 Senior Driving Class 114.00 Minnesota Safety Council 11/19/2020 101-1560-4300 Senior Driving Class 486.00 Minnesota Safety Council 600.00 MINNETONKA AQUATICS, ISD 276 11/25/2020 101-1540-4300 Lake Ann Beach Lifeguards 33,304.00 MINNETONKA AQUATICS, ISD 276 33,304.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 11/19/2020 700-0000-4509 Connection Fee 20,642.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 20,642.00 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 12/03/2020 605-6502-4751 Services 2,306.40 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 2,306.40 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/03/2020 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 56.06 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/03/2020 210-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 3.96 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/03/2020 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.59 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/03/2020 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.59 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/03/2020 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 0.80 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 80.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 12/03/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 36.67 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 12/03/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 25.38 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 12/03/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 952.11 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC 1,014.16 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 11/19/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 145.26 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 11/19/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 5,902.47 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 11/19/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 3,073.48 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 9,121.21 Olin Marion 11/25/2020 101-1560-3637 Make Your Phone Your Friend - Class Refund 28.00 Olin Marion 28.00 OLSON ALLEN & BARBARA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 50.77 OLSON ALLEN & BARBARA 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.05 OLSON ALLEN & BARBARA 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.62 OLSON ALLEN & BARBARA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.29 OLSON ALLEN & BARBARA 61.73 Patnode Diane 11/25/2020 101-1560-3637 Refund - Make Your Phone Your Friend 56.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 9 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Patnode Diane 56.00 POSTMASTER 11/30/2020 700-0000-4330 Utility Statements 316.25 POSTMASTER 11/30/2020 701-0000-4330 Utility Statements 316.25 POSTMASTER 12/03/2020 101-1120-4330 Annual PO Box Fee 114.00 POSTMASTER 12/03/2020 101-1220-4300 Annual PO Box Fee - Chanhassen Fire Department 114.00 POSTMASTER 860.50 Pratley Chris 12/03/2020 101-1320-4240 Clothing 24.99 Pratley Chris 24.99 Rademacher Daniel 12/03/2020 720-0000-4300 Removal of nuisance beaver 240.00 Rademacher Daniel 240.00 RESULTS TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 127.93 RESULTS TITLE 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 43.71 RESULTS TITLE 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.57 RESULTS TITLE 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.01 RESULTS TITLE 190.22 Roach Derek 11/25/2020 101-1537-3631 Go Gymnastics Refund 35.00 Roach Derek 35.00 Rodenz Brian 12/03/2020 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Rodenz Brian 100.00 RZONCA GARY & JANET 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 72.88 RZONCA GARY & JANET 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.46 RZONCA GARY & JANET 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.22 RZONCA GARY & JANET 86.56 Scherber Tom 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-01763 - 1680 Motorplex Court #7 250.00 Scherber Tom 250.00 SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACY TITLE CO 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 73.23 SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACY TITLE CO 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 104.10 SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACY TITLE CO 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.16 SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACY TITLE CO 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.73 SCOTT COUNTY ABSTRACY TITLE CO 185.22 SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 11/19/2020 101-1220-4370 Training 350.00 SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 350.00 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 12/03/2020 700-7043-4150 Materials 194.84 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 10 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount SHERWIN WILLIAMS 194.84 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 11/19/2020 101-1220-4350 Cleaning of fire station 58.59 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 11/19/2020 101-1190-4150 Bait Traps 21.98 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 80.57 SM HENTGES & SONS 11/19/2020 605-6503-4751 CSAH 101 Improvement 40,292.82 SM HENTGES & SONS 11/19/2020 605-6502-4751 CSAH 101 Improvement 1,581,495.86 SM HENTGES & SONS 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-02800 - 7141 Galpin Blvd 250.00 SM HENTGES & SONS 1,622,038.68 Smuda Philip & Valerie 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-02847 - 1445 Hemlock Way 250.00 Smuda Philip & Valerie 250.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 11/25/2020 101-1160-4220 Symantec Enterprise AV Annual Renewal 2,278.80 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 11/25/2020 101-1160-4220 AD Audit Plus Pro Annual Renewal 942.64 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 3,221.44 ST CROIX NANCY 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.22 ST CROIX NANCY 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.94 ST CROIX NANCY 13.16 Strategic Government Resources Inc 11/25/2020 101-1110-4300 Professional Services 9,411.67 Strategic Government Resources Inc 9,411.67 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 11/25/2020 101-1220-4300 Annual Fire Alarm Inspection 400.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 11/25/2020 101-1190-4300 Annual Fire Alarm Inspection 300.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 11/25/2020 101-1550-4300 Annual Fire Alarm Inspection 200.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 11/25/2020 101-1170-4300 Annual Fire Alarm Inspection 400.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 12/03/2020 101-1370-4300 Annual Fire Alarm Inspection 400.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 12/03/2020 101-1220-4300 Annual Sprinker Inspection 195.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 12/03/2020 101-1190-4300 Annual Sprinker Inspection 195.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 12/03/2020 101-1170-4300 Annual Sprinkler Inspection 230.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 12/03/2020 101-1370-4300 Annual Sprinkler Inspection 245.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 12/03/2020 101-1550-4300 Annual Sprinkler Inspection 325.00 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 2,890.00 Sund Dean & Marie 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-03113 - 8139 Dakota Lane 250.00 Sund Dean & Marie 250.00 SUPERIOR LAWN & LANDSCAPE 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-02794 - 6379 Oxbow Bend 1,000.00 SUPERIOR LAWN & LANDSCAPE 1,000.00 Tennyson Richard 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-04091 - 2722 Piper Ridge Lane 250.00 Tennyson Richard 250.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 11 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1120-4040 LTD - December 72.58 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1130-4040 LTD - December 31.25 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1160-4040 LTD - December 29.31 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1250-4040 LTD - December 110.94 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1310-4040 LTD - December 64.41 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1320-4040 LTD - December 147.40 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1370-4040 LTD - December 48.31 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1520-4040 LTD - December 35.58 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1530-4040 LTD - December 15.05 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1560-4040 LTD - December 12.59 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1600-4040 LTD - December 10.31 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1700-4040 LTD - December 1.15 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1550-4040 LTD - December 97.06 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1420-4040 LTD - December 84.05 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1430-4040 LTD - December 5.00 The Hartford 12/03/2020 210-0000-4040 LTD - December 18.67 The Hartford 12/03/2020 720-7201-4040 LTD - December 5.90 The Hartford 12/03/2020 720-7202-4040 LTD - December 5.90 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1170-4040 LTD - December 12.87 The Hartford 12/03/2020 101-1220-4040 LTD - December 44.67 The Hartford 12/03/2020 701-0000-4040 LTD - December 81.74 The Hartford 12/03/2020 700-0000-4040 LTD - December 107.85 The Hartford 12/03/2020 720-0000-4040 LTD - December 42.46 The Hartford 1,085.05 THE KINGSTON SPURBECK REVOCABLE TRUST11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.05 THE KINGSTON SPURBECK REVOCABLE TRUST11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.92 THE KINGSTON SPURBECK REVOCABLE TRUST11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.59 THE KINGSTON SPURBECK REVOCABLE TRUST11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.47 THE KINGSTON SPURBECK REVOCABLE TRUST 22.03 TITLE MARK LLC 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.45 TITLE MARK LLC 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 42.60 TITLE MARK LLC 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.28 TITLE MARK LLC 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.25 TITLE MARK LLC 63.58 TITLE SMART INC 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 23.75 TITLE SMART INC 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.65 TITLE SMART INC 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.44 TITLE SMART INC 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.25 TITLE SMART INC 38.09 TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 12/03/2020 815-8202-2024 Permit 2020-02904 - 7000 Mill Creek Lane 250.00 TWO TEACHER CONSTRUCTION 250.00 VAN EPS NANCY VAN EPS 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 50.26 VAN EPS NANCY VAN EPS 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 93.02 VAN EPS NANCY VAN EPS 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.61 VAN EPS NANCY VAN EPS 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.80 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 12 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount VAN EPS NANCY VAN EPS 166.69 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/25/2020 101-1550-4300 Disposal 750.40 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 101-1370-4350 Monthly Service 121.48 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 700-0000-4350 Monthly Service 15.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 701-0000-4350 Monthly Service 15.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 101-1550-4350 Monthly Service 477.99 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 101-1190-4350 Monthly Service 240.59 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 101-1170-4350 Monthly Service 205.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 77.97 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 11/19/2020 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 30.38 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,934.83 WATCHHORN ROGER & LEANNA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 28.51 WATCHHORN ROGER & LEANNA 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.54 WATCHHORN ROGER & LEANNA 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.63 WATCHHORN ROGER & LEANNA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.28 WATCHHORN ROGER & LEANNA 45.96 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 104.05 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.46 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.22 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 117.73 WEINZETL JODY & TONY 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 328.20 WEINZETL JODY & TONY 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 122.79 WEINZETL JODY & TONY 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.43 WEINZETL JODY & TONY 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.18 WEINZETL JODY & TONY 470.60 WING RICHARD 11/19/2020 101-1220-4350 Station 2 Cleaner 100.00 WING RICHARD 100.00 YOKIEL RICK & CYNTHIA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.94 YOKIEL RICK & CYNTHIA 11/19/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.22 YOKIEL RICK & CYNTHIA 11/19/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.01 YOKIEL RICK & CYNTHIA 11/19/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.59 YOKIEL RICK & CYNTHIA 5.76 Zion Investments LLC 11/25/2020 410-0000-4710 City trail for 8077 Century Blvd 95,289.00 Zion Investments LLC 95,289.00 2,192,152.11 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (12/07/2020 - 12:28 PM)Page 13 of 13 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM Name Check D Account Description Amount A&J Outdoor Power LLC 11/17/2020 700-0000-4120 Supplies 224.49 A&J Outdoor Power LLC 224.49 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 11/25/2020 700-0000-4530 Professional Services 125.92 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 125.92 A1 Security Camera LLC 11/17/2020 701-0000-4510 Camera Mounts Lift station 24 225.28 A1 Security Camera LLC 225.28 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 11/19/2020 101-1190-4300 Quarterly Service 270.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 12/03/2020 101-1170-4300 Monthly Service 131.25 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 401.25 Adobe 11/17/2020 101-1160-4220 Adobe Photoshop Elements Update - Rice 161.05 Adobe 161.05 Advanced Service and Parts LLC 11/17/2020 701-0000-4120 Parts 253.25 Advanced Service and Parts LLC 253.25 Al-Hilwani Juli 11/19/2020 101-1539-4300 Pickleball Lessons 75.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 11/19/2020 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 292.50 Al-Hilwani Juli 367.50 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-7019-4150 Supplies 11.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-0000-4530 Parts 43.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-7019-4150 Supplies 11.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1370-4510 Supplies 44.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Materials 394.45 Amazon 11/17/2020 701-0000-4120 Supplies 85.98 Amazon 11/17/2020 701-0000-4240 PPE 37.33 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-7043-4150 Supplies 9.79 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-7043-4150 Materials 115.50 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1565-4130 Memory Cafe Kit supplies 6.95 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1565-4130 Memory Cafe Kit supplies 7.95 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1565-4130 Memory Care Kits Supplies Birds Music Misc 254.50 Amazon 11/17/2020 212-0000-4150 Disposable Cone Paper Cups 39.98 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1600-4130 Desk tray organizer - JR 32.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1614-4130 Halloween Programs 109.87 Amazon 11/17/2020 400-4126-4703 Fiber Trancievers 398.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 1 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Amazon 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Network Switch - PW EOC - COVID 775.00 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-0000-4705 Network Transceivers + Switch Bracket - Tower 3 39.55 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1160-4300 Sewer Televising Access Fees - September 1.23 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-0000-4705 Network Tranceivers + Switch Bracket - Tower 3 2,371.82 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-0000-4705 Network Switch for Tower 3 940.00 Amazon 11/17/2020 400-4126-4703 MicroSD Card Power Bank 133.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 700-0000-4510 Camera Lift station 24 1,179.00 Amazon 11/17/2020 400-4126-4703 UPS for lift station and well 376.84 Amazon 11/17/2020 400-4126-4703 desk monitor mount Charlie H 28.89 Amazon 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Laptop bags COVID 353.70 Amazon 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Laptop docking stations COVID 3,450.83 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1220-4290 Knife Set 30.42 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1220-4350 Antibacterial Disinfectant Cleanert 48.87 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 office supplies 43.20 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 office supplies 43.44 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 office supplies 10.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 Office supplies 125.93 Amazon 11/17/2020 212-0000-4110 covid office supplies 112.29 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 office supplies 17.37 Amazon 11/17/2020 212-0000-4110 Covid office supplies 108.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 400-4148-4706 Lobby refresh 59.49 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 Office supplies 22.49 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 office supplies 24.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 Office supplies 9.99 Amazon 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 Office supplies 89.89 Amazon 12,005.45 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 11/25/2020 101-0000-2008 November Insurance 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 American Planning Association 11/17/2020 101-1420-4370 Midwest Planning Conference 100.00 American Planning Association 11/17/2020 101-1420-4370 Midwest Planning Conference 100.00 American Planning Association 200.00 American Public Works Association 11/17/2020 701-0000-4120 National Public Works Week Poster 21.49 American Public Works Association 21.49 Apple.com 11/17/2020 700-0000-4310 Storage 0.99 Apple.com 11/17/2020 101-1220-4310 cloud storage 0.99 Apple.com 1.98 Baldwin Supply Company 11/17/2020 700-0000-4530 Parts 94.70 Baldwin Supply Company 11/17/2020 700-0000-4530 Parts 9.28 Baldwin Supply Company 103.98 BATTERIES PLUS 11/25/2020 101-1190-4530 Battery 65.85 BATTERIES PLUS 12/03/2020 700-7043-4150 Battery 57.95 Batteries Plus 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Supplies 39.77 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 2 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Batteries Plus 163.57 BENSON KAYE L 11/19/2020 101-1539-4300 Fit for Life 616.00 BENSON KAYE L 616.00 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 11/19/2020 101-1140-4302 Legal Services 21,179.92 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 21,179.92 Carhartt 11/17/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing Allowance - Jacob Casebeer 234.97 Carhartt 234.97 Carver County 11/25/2020 101-1150-4300 2020 Assessment Contract 147,495.40 Carver County 11/25/2020 101-1210-4300 2020 Police Contract 949,397.50 Carver County 1,096,892.90 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 101-1220-4320 Monthly Service 97.95 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 2,556.53 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 101-1540-4320 Monthly Service 287.73 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service 306.75 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 23.50 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 90.51 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service 1,434.27 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 11/19/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 1,043.48 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 5,840.72 CDW Government 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Laptop to Display Cables - Rice 33.06 CDW Government 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Laptop return credit -2,155.67 CDW Government -2,122.61 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 12/03/2020 101-0000-2008 November Insurance 60.72 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 12/03/2020 700-0000-2008 November Insurance 19.22 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 12/03/2020 701-0000-2008 November Insurance 19.22 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 99.16 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.12/03/2020 101-1160-4300 SSL Certificate Renewal 220.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 220.00 Corporate Card Annual Fee 11/17/2020 101-1130-4300 Annual Fee - Jake Foster 12.00 Corporate Card Annual Fee 11/17/2020 101-1130-4300 Annual Fee - Charlie Burke 12.00 Corporate Card Annual Fee 24.00 Cub Foods 11/17/2020 101-1560-4130 Octoberfest supplies & Driver Safety Class snack supplies 35.50 Cub Foods 11/17/2020 101-1614-4130 Boo Your Neighbor program supplies 28.13 Cub Foods 63.63 Danial Reem 11/25/2020 101-1539-4300 Zumba Class 238.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 3 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Danial Reem 238.00 Davanni's 11/17/2020 101-1110-4370 City council dinner 121.71 Davanni's 11/17/2020 101-1110-4370 City council dinner 112.98 Davanni's 11/17/2020 101-1110-4370 City Council dinner 111.85 Davanni's 346.54 Dell 11/17/2020 400-4126-4703 Laptop Bag - Rice 64.41 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Return credit for laptops from Dell COVID -3,630.29 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Dell laptop docking stations COVID 1,046.96 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Return credit for laptops from Dell COVID -3,630.29 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Dell Docking Station Return Credit -661.64 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Dell Laptop COVID/Return Pending 7,510.89 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Dell Docking station/ COVID/ Return Pending 661.64 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Dell COVID laptops Returned -7,510.89 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Return credit for laptop from dell COVID -2,737.00 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Dell return credit for docking stations COVID -661.64 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Laptop Rick COVID 2,748.90 Dell 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Dell laptops COVID 5,715.90 Dell -1,083.05 Delta Dental 11/25/2020 101-0000-2013 December Insurance 1,850.60 Delta Dental 11/25/2020 101-0000-2013 December Insurance 30.20 Delta Dental 11/25/2020 700-0000-2013 December Insurance 288.00 Delta Dental 11/25/2020 701-0000-2013 December Insurance 257.80 Delta Dental 11/25/2020 720-0000-2013 December Insurance 150.50 Delta Dental 2,577.10 Dollar Tree Stores Inc 11/17/2020 101-1614-4130 Boo Your Neighbor program supplies 91.70 Dollar Tree Stores Inc 91.70 Eddie Bauer 11/17/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing Allowance - Jacob Casebeer 105.98 Eddie Bauer 105.98 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 12/03/2020 101-1320-4120 Supplies 611.11 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 611.11 Encyrptomatic LLC 11/17/2020 101-1160-4220 PST Pro Annual Renewal 21.46 Encyrptomatic LLC 21.46 FASTENAL COMPANY 11/25/2020 101-1370-4120 Supplies 22.50 FASTENAL COMPANY 11/19/2020 101-1320-4120 Supplies 186.16 FASTENAL COMPANY 11/19/2020 700-0000-4120 Supplies 112.61 Fastenal Company 11/17/2020 701-0000-4530 Parts 11.70 Fastenal Company 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Parts 14.40 Fastenal Company 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Parts 23.59 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 4 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Fastenal Company 370.96 FedEx Office 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Shipping boxes for returns 35.41 FedEx Office 35.41 Fidelity Security Life 11/25/2020 101-0000-2007 December 212.39 Fidelity Security Life 11/25/2020 700-0000-2007 December 16.67 Fidelity Security Life 11/25/2020 701-0000-2007 December 16.66 Fidelity Security Life 11/25/2020 720-0000-2007 December 9.70 Fidelity Security Life 255.42 Filters Fast 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Materials 103.99 Filters Fast 103.99 Fleet Farm 11/17/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing Allowance - Charlie Chihos 65.99 Fleet Farm 11/17/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing Allowance - Charlie Chihos 65.98 Fleet Farm 131.97 Franklin Planner 11/17/2020 101-1420-4120 Calendar 38.80 Franklin Planner 38.80 Funeral Flowers/Gifts 11/17/2020 101-1110-4300 Flowers for Tom Furlong's mother's funeral 75.10 Funeral Flowers/Gifts 75.10 Global Industrial Solutions 11/17/2020 700-0000-4170 Materials 877.19 Global Industrial Solutions 877.19 Government Finance Officers Association 11/17/2020 101-1130-4370 Training 20.00 Government Finance Officers Association 11/17/2020 101-1130-4370 Training Credit -20.00 Government Finance Officers Association 0.00 Grainger 11/17/2020 701-0000-4120 Supplies 41.28 Grainger 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Materials -56.91 Grainger 11/17/2020 701-0000-4530 Supplies 64.20 Grainger 48.57 Hach Company 11/17/2020 700-7019-4530 Chemicals 1,155.87 Hach Company 1,155.87 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 11/19/2020 720-7025-4300 Stone Creek Topography 1,979.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 1,979.00 Home Depot 11/17/2020 700-0000-4240 PPE 21.35 Home Depot 11/17/2020 700-0000-4260 Equipment 125.50 Home Depot 11/17/2020 101-1550-4151 Materials 60.02 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 5 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Home Depot 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Supplies 28.77 Home Depot 11/17/2020 101-1370-4510 Microwave 75.14 Home Depot 310.78 ImageTrend, Inc 12/03/2020 101-1220-4300 Annual Fee 262.26 ImageTrend, Inc 262.26 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/25/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 139.96 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 21.87 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 88.65 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 19.20 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 11/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 51.72 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/03/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 39.25 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/03/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 87.99 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 448.64 IQ Products 11/17/2020 700-0000-4530 Equipment 48.45 IQ Products 48.45 J.J. Keller & Associates Inc 11/17/2020 101-1220-4120 Supplies 25.65 J.J. Keller & Associates Inc 25.65 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 12/03/2020 101-1220-4530 Supplies 358.37 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 358.37 Jimmy Johns 11/17/2020 101-1220-4370 Lunch Provided for all day training session 175.06 Jimmy Johns 175.06 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 11/25/2020 101-1220-4260 Supplies 29.25 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 11/19/2020 101-1190-4530 Supplies 40.05 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 69.30 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/25/2020 605-6502-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction 72,243.39 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 11/25/2020 605-6503-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction 7,999.94 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 80,243.33 K-Log, Inc 11/17/2020 400-4125-4703 Lobby Furniture 8,403.43 K-Log, Inc 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 Lobby Furniture Cares 3,469.77 K-Log, Inc 11,873.20 Kohls 11/17/2020 101-1550-4240 Clothing Allowance - Adam B 159.97 Kohls 159.97 Lunds & Byerly's 11/17/2020 101-1600-4130 Red Birds State Title City Council Recognition 49.99 Lunds & Byerly's 11/17/2020 101-1220-4370 Food for supplemental training 25.56 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 6 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Lunds & Byerly's 75.55 Macqueen Emergengy Group 12/03/2020 101-1220-4120 Supplies 412.78 Macqueen Emergengy Group 412.78 Maus Kerry 11/25/2020 101-1539-4300 Line Dancing 116.25 Maus Kerry 116.25 McDonald's 11/17/2020 101-1220-4370 Food for Training evolutions 53.47 McDonald's 53.47 McLean Parts 11/17/2020 700-7043-4150 Materials 224.00 McLean Parts 224.00 Menards 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Materials 25.76 Menards 11/17/2020 700-7043-4150 Materials 89.25 Menards 11/17/2020 700-7043-4150 Materials 180.02 Menards 295.03 Merlins Ace Hardware 11/17/2020 701-0000-4551 Supplies 30.84 Merlins Ace Hardware 30.84 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 11/19/2020 101-1250-3816 October 2020 -124.25 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 11/19/2020 701-0000-2023 October 2020 12,425.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 12,300.75 Mike Hage Distinctive Concrete & Masonry 11/17/2020 700-7019-4150 Concrete Work at EWTP 1,050.00 Mike Hage Distinctive Concrete & Masonry 1,050.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 11/19/2020 101-1250-3818 October 2020 -154.86 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 11/19/2020 101-0000-2022 October 2020 7,742.84 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 7,587.98 MN Pollution Control Agency 11/17/2020 700-0000-4370 Training - Jacob Casebeer 55.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 11/17/2020 701-0000-4370 Training - Jacob Casebeer 390.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 445.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 11/19/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 247.01 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Electricity 156.47 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Electricity 43.57 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Electricity 130.29 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 577.34 MyPlumbingTraining.com 11/17/2020 101-1250-4370 Training 140.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 7 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount MyPlumbingTraining.com 140.00 NAICS Association 11/17/2020 101-1420-4370 Business Classification Code book 48.00 NAICS Association 48.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 11/19/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 16.27 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 16.27 New Horizons Minnesota 11/17/2020 101-1120-4370 Adobe Photoshop 790.00 New Horizons Minnesota 790.00 North American Safety, Inc.11/25/2020 700-0000-4240 PPE Clothing 433.00 North American Safety, Inc.11/25/2020 701-0000-4240 PPE Clothing 433.00 North American Safety, Inc. 866.00 Nuss Truck & Equipment 11/25/2020 101-1320-4140 Supplies 21.30 Nuss Truck & Equipment 11/25/2020 101-1320-4140 Supplies - Return -71.01 Nuss Truck & Equipment 11/25/2020 101-1320-4140 Supplies 75.52 Nuss Truck & Equipment 25.81 Office Max/Office Depot 11/17/2020 101-1220-4370 Training Supplies 9.65 Office Max/Office Depot 9.65 Once Upon a Sign & Printing 11/17/2020 700-7043-4150 Materials 107.53 Once Upon a Sign & Printing 107.53 Painters Gear Inc 11/17/2020 700-0000-4530 Equipment 411.11 Painters Gear Inc 411.11 Party City 11/17/2020 101-1614-4130 Boo Your Neighbor program supplies 54.49 Party City 11/17/2020 101-1614-4130 Boo Your Neighbor program supplies -8.04 Party City 46.45 PayPal 11/17/2020 700-0000-4370 Webinar 50.00 PayPal 11/17/2020 700-0000-4370 Webinar 50.00 PayPal 11/17/2020 720-7202-4370 Invasive species conference 95.00 PayPal 11/17/2020 701-0000-4510 Pendant camera mount lift station 24 91.26 PayPal 286.26 Plant & Flanged Equipment Company 12/03/2020 700-0000-4250 Supplies 170.20 Plant & Flanged Equipment Company 12/03/2020 700-0000-4250 Supplies 151.95 Plant & Flanged Equipment Company 322.15 Potentia MN Solar 11/19/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 1,918.10 Potentia MN Solar 11/19/2020 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service 3,580.92 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 8 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Potentia MN Solar 11/19/2020 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service 2,754.68 Potentia MN Solar 8,253.70 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 11/25/2020 101-1320-4120 Supplies 27.80 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 11/19/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 14.44 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 11/19/2020 101-1550-4120 Supplies 10.47 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 52.71 Premium Waters, Inc 11/25/2020 101-1550-4120 Bottle water service 75.39 Premium Waters, Inc 75.39 Pro-Tec Design, Inc.11/25/2020 101-1160-4300 Reconfigure Station 2 controllers 164.50 Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 164.50 Quill Corporation 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 office supplies 38.97 Quill Corporation 38.97 RBM SERVICES INC 11/19/2020 101-1190-4350 Cleaning Service 3,575.23 RBM SERVICES INC 11/19/2020 101-1170-4350 Cleaning Service 3,690.87 RBM SERVICES INC 7,266.10 Safetysign.com 11/17/2020 101-1370-4510 Safety Signs 38.74 Safetysign.com 38.74 Seton Indentification Products 11/17/2020 700-0000-4150 Materials 22.36 Seton Indentification Products 22.36 ShareFile 11/17/2020 101-1160-4300 Sharefile Q4 Service Billing 565.33 ShareFile 565.33 SmartSign 11/17/2020 101-1170-4110 Safety Signs 33.75 SmartSign 33.75 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 11/25/2020 101-1110-4360 Member Investment 866.00 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 866.00 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 11/25/2020 101-1250-4240 Clothing 426.90 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 426.90 Springbrook 11/19/2020 400-4117-4703 Maintenance 39,399.80 Springbrook 11/19/2020 700-0000-4300 Maintenance 2,693.25 Springbrook 11/19/2020 701-0000-4300 Maintenance 2,693.25 Springbrook 11/19/2020 720-0000-4300 Maintenance 2,693.25 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 9 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Springbrook 47,479.55 Sprinkler Warehouse 11/17/2020 101-1550-4151 Irrigation Supplies 1,403.37 Sprinkler Warehouse 1,403.37 SPRINT PCS 11/25/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 51.72 SPRINT PCS 11/25/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 51.72 SPRINT PCS 103.44 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 11/19/2020 815-8221-2024 Lyman Blvd Sewer and Watermain Improvements 2,628.36 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 2,628.36 Stericycle Inc 11/17/2020 101-1160-4300 Shredding Service - 1 Bin 184.48 Stericycle Inc 184.48 STRATOGUARD LLC 11/19/2020 101-1160-4300 Proofpoint Emailing Filtering 176.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 176.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 12/03/2020 101-1260-4140 Supplies 47.74 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 47.74 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-0000-2011 December Life Insurance 50.66 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1120-4040 December Life Insurance 33.36 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1130-4040 December Life Insurance 14.23 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1160-4040 December Life Insurance 13.32 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1250-4040 December Life Insurance 50.51 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1310-4040 December Life Insurance 38.33 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1320-4040 December Life Insurance 57.65 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1370-4040 December Life Insurance 21.35 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1520-4040 December Life Insurance 16.13 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1530-4040 December Life Insurance 6.82 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1560-4040 December Life Insurance 5.76 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1600-4040 December Life Insurance 4.66 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1700-4040 December Life Insurance 0.52 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1550-4040 December Life Insurance 43.52 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1420-4040 December Life Insurance 38.61 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1430-4040 December Life Insurance 2.28 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 210-0000-4040 December Life Insurance 8.48 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 720-7201-4040 December Life Insurance 2.69 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 720-7202-4040 December Life Insurance 2.69 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1170-4040 December Life Insurance 3.81 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-1220-4040 December Life Insurance 20.74 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 701-0000-4040 December Life Insurance 37.06 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 700-0000-4040 December Life Insurance 48.95 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 720-0000-4040 December Life Insurance 19.43 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 101-0000-2011 December Life Insurance 627.99 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 210-0000-2011 December Life Insurance 10.59 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 700-0000-2011 December Life Insurance 147.26 Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 701-0000-2011 December Life Insurance 147.26 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 10 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Sun Life Financial 12/03/2020 720-0000-2011 December Life Insurance 8.59 Sun Life Financial 1,483.25 Target 11/17/2020 700-7043-4150 Supplies 8.59 Target 11/17/2020 101-1614-4130 Boo Your Neighbor program supplies 90.62 Target 99.21 TBEI, Inc 11/25/2020 101-1320-4120 Supplies 94.00 TBEI, Inc 11/25/2020 101-1550-4140 Supplies 42.00 TBEI, Inc 12/03/2020 400-4108-4704 Equipment 104,627.00 TBEI, Inc 12/03/2020 101-1320-4140 Equipment 1,968.47 TBEI, Inc 12/03/2020 101-1320-4120 Equipment 4,645.00 TBEI, Inc 12/03/2020 101-1320-4120 Equipment 507.00 TBEI, Inc 111,883.47 The Mustard Seed 11/17/2020 701-0000-4510 Materials 41.33 The Mustard Seed 41.33 UNITED WAY 11/19/2020 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00420.11.2020 United Way 30.40 UNITED WAY 12/03/2020 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00404.12.2020 United Way 30.40 UNITED WAY 60.80 Urban Land Institute 11/17/2020 101-1420-4360 Urban Land Institute Membership 200.00 Urban Land Institute 11/17/2020 101-1420-4360 Urban Land Institute Membership 240.00 Urban Land Institute 440.00 USA BLUE BOOK 11/19/2020 700-7043-4150 Supplies 875.28 USA BLUE BOOK 875.28 USABlueBook 11/17/2020 701-0000-4551 Materials 505.01 USABlueBook 505.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1550-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 440.24 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1520-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 41.45 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1600-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 129.99 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1530-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 41.45 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 752.67 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 607.46 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 720-0000-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 151.74 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1160-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 92.90 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1120-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 129.55 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1170-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 41.45 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1260-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 76.46 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1130-4310 Monthly Cell Phone -38.91 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1250-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 747.92 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1310-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 146.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1370-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 100.53 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1320-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 335.09 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 11 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1220-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 503.02 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-0000-2033 Monthly Cell Phone 11.30 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/03/2020 101-1220-4310 Monthly Cell Phone 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,350.32 Vista Print 11/17/2020 101-1600-4340 Sponsorship trifold printing 301.04 Vista Print 301.04 WALKER ROOFING COMPANY INC 11/25/2020 700-7025-4706 Professional Services 36,261.12 WALKER ROOFING COMPANY INC 36,261.12 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc.11/25/2020 101-1320-4540 Relocated Barrier 300.00 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 300.00 Werner Electric 11/17/2020 701-0000-4530 Parts -5.00 Werner Electric -5.00 West Suburban Innovative Storage 11/17/2020 700-0000-4120 Supplies 1,599.20 West Suburban Innovative Storage 1,599.20 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 12/03/2020 700-0000-4550 Materials 698.08 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 698.08 Workboots.com 11/17/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing Allowance 34.49 Workboots.com 11/17/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing Allowance 34.49 Workboots.com 68.98 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/03/2020 101-1310-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support 95.40 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/03/2020 101-1320-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support 95.40 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/03/2020 700-0000-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support 95.40 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/03/2020 701-0000-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support 95.40 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/03/2020 720-0000-4300 2020 GIS/AMS Support 95.40 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/03/2020 720-0000-4300 2020 Water Resources Support Services 1,651.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 2,128.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 62.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 33.14 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service 3,482.41 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 290.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 12 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 40.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 1,786.29 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Service 1.74 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 40.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 11/25/2020 700-7043-4320 Monthly Service 4,991.98 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Electricity 45.58 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Electricity 28.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Electricity 34.20 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Electricity 28.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Electricity 130.17 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Electricity 28.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Electricity 66.74 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Electricity -432.04 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Electricity 398.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Electricity 580.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Electricity 2,501.21 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1540-4320 Monthly Electricity 94.59 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Electricity 35.15 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1550-4320 Monthly Electricity -1.40 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Electricity 388.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1170-4320 Monthly Electricity -661.18 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1190-4320 Monthly Electricity -890.68 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1220-4320 Monthly Electricity 863.94 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1370-4320 Monthly Electricity 1,223.09 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 101-1171-4320 Monthly Electricity 17.20 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Electricity 152.89 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Electricity 152.88 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Electricity 688.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 16,316.18 Zoom 11/17/2020 212-0000-4703 monthly zoom webinar charge/COVID/ Rec Center/Admin 85.90 Zoom 85.90 1,512,857.59 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (12/08/2020 - 9:37 AM)Page 13 of 13 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject Monthly Fire Department Update Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.2. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: SUMMARY Monthly Fire Department Update with Response Data from November ATTACHMENTS: Narrative Supporting Documents TO: Heather Johnston, Interim City Manager FROM: Don Johnson, Fire Chief DATE: November 23, 2020 SUBJ: Monthly Fire Department Update Fire Department Staffing Department staffing remains at 44 paid on-call firefighters. One Firefighter is on extended personal leave. November held some challenges with several staff being impacted with exposure to COVID-19 through non-department contacts. Each case was cautiously reviewed with Jake Foster to ensure consistent application of city policies were applied and proper quarantine measures were followed. Fire Department Response The fire department responded to (84) calls for service in October. Call Breakdown for the month: 1 Chief Only 19 Day Only 31 Duty Crew 33 General Alarms Significant calls included the following:  (41) Rescue/EMS calls with (7) motor vehicle accidents.  (5) Fire Responses o (1) Small brush fire involving juveniles o (1) Cooking Fire o (3) Structure Fire Responses; (1) residential fire on Highland Drive (1) Long Lake Mutual Aid, (1) Excelsior Mutual Aid,  (1) Responses to Unauthorized Burning Heather Johnston Fire Department Update Page 2 Monthly Training  On Line Mental Health Training  Live Burn Training at the SCALE training facility in Jordan  On Line EMS Training: Trauma Assessments and Treatments  Incident Fire Ground Simulation Training on Response to Strip Mall Fires Other Activities  A/Chief Nutter, I, and Utility Superintendent Kevin Crooks met to discuss the Response Mitigation Plan (RMP) for the WWTP. This is a federal requirement based on the amount of chlorine on site. We discuss response, readiness, and guidelines for potential emergencies at the plant. We have agreed that a functional exercise to test capabilities will occur in the spring.  On November 5th, I provided a virtual tour of the fire station and a fire engine for an elementary school in Spain. It was a fun experience that we discussed continuing into the future.  (2) Firefighter EMTs covered the Chanhassen football home game on November 5 and November 21 Fire Marshal Council Update for October 2020  Assisted Dean’s Tanks with a permit for tank removal at the old Marathon site. Soil samples were taken to determine if further mitigation will be necessary.  Sent letters to approximately 70 businesses in town advising that they will be contacted for a fire inspection in the coming months. This included; businesses with liquor licenses, hotels, assisted living facilities, apartments, and child care facilities. ³CH±"F) "F) Date Created: 12/4/2020 Document Path: K:\Departments\Fire\FireIncidents_RMS\2020-11(November)\FireIncidentMap_November2020.aprxCreated By: City of Chanhassen - Fire Department Calls For Service - November 2020 ³CH±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers Lakes Parks Parcel Boundaries Fire Box Alarm Zones North Box South Box West Box City of Chanhassen Fire Calls for Service - November 2020 µ0 4,000 Feet 0 0.5 Mile Basic Incident Date Time: Incident Type (Fd1.21): Elite mnfirereport Incident Type Report (Summary) Incident Type Total Incidents Total Incidents % of Incidents Total Property Loss Total Content Loss Total Loss Incident Type Category: 1 - Fire 111 - Building fire 2 2.7%50,000 10,000 60,000 113 - Cooking fire, confined to container 2 2.7%0 350 350 116 - Fuel burner/boiler malfunction, fire confined 1 1.3%5,000 0 5,000 Total: 5 Total: 6.7%Total: 55,000 Total: 10,350 Total: 65,350 Incident Type Category: 3 - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incident 311 - Medical assist, assist EMS crew 1 1.3% 321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 42 56.0% 322 - Motor vehicle accident with injuries 5 6.7% 324 - Motor vehicle accident with no injuries.1 1.3% 350 - Extrication, rescue, other 1 1.3% Total: 50 Total: 66.7%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 4 - Hazardous Condition (No Fire) 412 - Gas leak (natural gas or LPG)1 1.3% 445 - Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 1 1.3% Total: 2 Total: 2.7%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 5 - Service Call 554 - Assist invalid 4 5.3% 571 - Cover assignment, standby, moveup 1 1.3% Total: 5 Total: 6.7%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 6 - Good Intent Call 611 - Dispatched and cancelled en route 2 2.7% 6111 - EMS Dispatched and cancelled en route 2 2.7% 651 - Smoke scare, odor of smoke 1 1.3%0 0 0 Total: 5 Total: 6.7%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Incident Type Category: 7 - False Alarm & False Call 731 - Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 1 1.3% 735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 1.3% 740 - Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 1 1.3% 741 - Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.3% 743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 2 2.7% 745 - Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 1 1.3% 746 - Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 1 1.3% Total: 8 Total: 10.7%Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 0 Total: 75 Total: 100.0%Total: 55,000 Total: 10,350 Total: 65,350 Report Filters is between '11/1/2020' and '11/30/2020' Report Criteria Is Not Blank Printed On: 12/03/2020 01:37:03 PM1 of 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, December 14, 2020 Subject 2020 Building Permit Activity November Year To Date Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.3. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: ATTACHMENTS: 2020 Building Permit Activity November YTD