Loading...
Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, APRIL 13, 2020 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) B.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS 1.Mayor Remarks C.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated March 9, 2020 2.Approve Special City Council Meeting Minutes dated March 20, 2020 3.Resolution 2020­XX: Municipal State Aid Street Funds Advance 4.Approve Arbor Day Poster Contest Winners 5.Resolution 2020­XX: Approve Consultant Agreement for Materials Testing on City Project 20­02, Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation 6.Approve Radio Replacements for Utility Billing System 7.Resolution 2020­XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03: Accept Feasibility Study; Call Public Hearing 8.Resolution No. 2020­XX: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2020 Sealcoat Project 9.Approve Purchase, Park Equipment Replacement Schedule for Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach 10.Approve City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies and Guidance Response to COVID­ 19 Pandemic D.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, APRIL 13, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)B.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Mayor RemarksC.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated March 9, 20202.Approve Special City Council Meeting Minutes dated March 20, 20203.Resolution 2020­XX: Municipal State Aid Street Funds Advance4.Approve Arbor Day Poster Contest Winners5.Resolution 2020­XX: Approve Consultant Agreement for Materials Testing on CityProject 20­02, Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation6.Approve Radio Replacements for Utility Billing System7.Resolution 2020­XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03: AcceptFeasibility Study; Call Public Hearing8.Resolution No. 2020­XX: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2020 SealcoatProject9.Approve Purchase, Park Equipment Replacement Schedule for Power Hill Park andLake Ann Park Beach10.Approve City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies and Guidance Response to COVID­19 PandemicD.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) 1.Questions submitted online will be read and answered E.OLD BUSINESS 1.Approve Amendment to Option Agreement ­ 195 West 79th Street F.NEW BUSINESS 1.Resolution 2020­XX: Authorize Refund of a Portion of On­Sale Liquor License Fees; Approve 2020 Liquor License Renewals 2.Approve a Request to Rezone Property Located North of West 78th Street and West of Lake Ann Park from Rural Residential District (RR) to High Density Residential District (R­16), Lot Consolidation and Site Plan Review with Variances for the Construction of a 48­Unit Continuing Care Retirement Facility 3.Resolution 2020­XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05: Accept Feasibility Report; Call Public Hearing G.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS H.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS I.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Fire Department Update 2.Law Enforcement Update 3.Review of Claims Paid 03­23­2020 4.Review of Claims Paid 04­13­2020 5.2020 Building Permit Activity March Year To Date J.ADJOURNMENT K.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue.  Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, APRIL 13, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)B.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Mayor RemarksC.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated March 9, 20202.Approve Special City Council Meeting Minutes dated March 20, 20203.Resolution 2020­XX: Municipal State Aid Street Funds Advance4.Approve Arbor Day Poster Contest Winners5.Resolution 2020­XX: Approve Consultant Agreement for Materials Testing on CityProject 20­02, Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation6.Approve Radio Replacements for Utility Billing System7.Resolution 2020­XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03: AcceptFeasibility Study; Call Public Hearing8.Resolution No. 2020­XX: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2020 SealcoatProject9.Approve Purchase, Park Equipment Replacement Schedule for Power Hill Park andLake Ann Park Beach10.Approve City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies and Guidance Response to COVID­19 PandemicD.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)1.Questions submitted online will be read and answeredE.OLD BUSINESS1.Approve Amendment to Option Agreement ­ 195 West 79th StreetF.NEW BUSINESS1.Resolution 2020­XX: Authorize Refund of a Portion of On­Sale Liquor License Fees;Approve 2020 Liquor License Renewals2.Approve a Request to Rezone Property Located North of West 78th Street and Westof Lake Ann Park from Rural Residential District (RR) to High Density ResidentialDistrict (R­16), Lot Consolidation and Site Plan Review with Variances for theConstruction of a 48­Unit Continuing Care Retirement Facility3.Resolution 2020­XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05: AcceptFeasibility Report; Call Public HearingG.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSH.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONSI.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION1.Fire Department Update2.Law Enforcement Update3.Review of Claims Paid 03­23­20204.Review of Claims Paid 04­13­20205.2020 Building Permit Activity March Year To DateJ.ADJOURNMENTK.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONSWelcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen CityCouncil wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is providedat every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required tocomplete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available athttps://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior tothe meeting.Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. Whencalled upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the CityCouncil as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the CityCouncil.If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokespersonthat can summarize the issue.  Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated March 9, 2020 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the minutes dated March 9, 2020." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Summary Minutes dated March 9, 2020 City Council Verbatim Minutes dated March 9, 2020 City Council Work Session Minutes dated March 9, 2020 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES MARCH 9, 2020 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Jake Foster, Charlie Howley, Greg Sticha, Bob Generous, Todd Hoffman and City Attorney Andrea Poehler PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS. Mayor Ryan read an official statement from the City of Chanhassen on how they are dealing with other agencies to address the Coronavirus, COVID-19 outbreak. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated February 24, 2020 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated February 18, 2020 3. Approve a Request for Sign Variances for the Existing Monument Sign Located at 306 West 78th Street (Chapel Hill) 4. Approve Memorandum of Understanding between City of Chaska, City of Chanhassen and Carver Trails Group for Mountain Bike Trail 5. Agreement for Carver County Conveyance of Real Property Located Within City of Chanhassen for Public Use as Recreational Trail for Off-Road Bikes 6. Resolution #2020-14: Parcel Exchange Agreement with Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District for CSAH 101 Improvements 7. Resolution #2020-15: Haak Property Parcel Transfer to Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District 8. Resolution #2020-16: Approve Entering into a Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT for the Highway 101 Planting Project City Council Summary – March 9, 2020 2 9. 2020 Chanhassen Farmers’ Market Agreement 10. 2020 CIP Vehicle Purchases 11. 2020-2024 4th of July Fireworks Contract 12. Highway 101 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Maintenance Agreement All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Joe Provinzino presented information from his Citizen Action Request form regarding problems with a neighbor who is using their house for VRBO short term rentals. AWARD OF BID FOR SALE OF $6,795,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2020A FOR VARIOUS CITY 2020 AND 2021 UTILITY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. Greg Sticha presented the staff report on this item. Nick Anhut with Ehlers and Associates announced the results of the bidding process. Resolution #2020-17: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council adopts a resolution awarding the bid for the General Obligation Bonds Series 2020A to the low bidder, Piper Sandler and Company. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to make the following commission appointments: For the Planning Commission Eric Noyes and Mark von Oven for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Park and Recreation Commission Karl Tsuchiya, Haley Pemrick Schubert and Jim Peck for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Environmental Commission Lucy Rehm and Markus Fischer for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Senior Commission Jerry Cerchia and Linda Haight for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023 and David Crouch for a one year term ending March 30, 2021. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. Mayor Ryan made note of a letter that went out to Senator Osmek and Representative Morrison regarding joint support from the City of City Council Summary – March 9, 2020 3 Chanhassen and Minnetonka School District for a roundabout on Highway 41 in front of Minnetonka Middle School West. Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 9, 2020 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Jake Foster, Charlie Howley, Greg Sticha, Bob Generous, Todd Hoffman and City Attorney Andrea Poehler Mayor Ryan: Again good evening everyone and welcome to our council meeting. To those of you that are watching at home or livestreaming on the Chanhassen website thank you for joining us this evening. For the record we have all of our council members present tonight so our first action is our agenda approval. Council members are there any modifications to the agenda as printed? If not we will proceed with the published agenda. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS. Mayor Ryan: First we have a quick public announcement. I know it’s not on the agenda but I’d like to just read and official statement coming from the City of Chanhassen as it relates to the Coronavirus or COVID-19. The City and first responders are working in concert with our Carver County Public Health officials as well as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Minnesota Department of Health to address issues related to the spread of the Coronavirus, COVID-19 in Carver County. City staff and emergency service personnel are in constant contact and coordination with the Carver County Public Health officials to manage the risk and the spread of this virus. Carver County Public Health will continue to be the main source, resource for residents as we continue to monitor the situation. I just wanted to make sure that we shared that information with the public but continue to check the Carver County Public Health website as well as the CDC for further information. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated February 24, 2020 2. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated February 18, 2020 3. Approve a Request for Sign Variances for the Existing Monument Sign Located at 306 West 78th Street (Chapel Hill) Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 2 4. Approve Memorandum of Understanding between City of Chaska, City of Chanhassen and Carver Trails Group for Mountain Bike Trail 5. Agreement for Carver County Conveyance of Real Property Located Within City of Chanhassen for Public Use as Recreational Trail for Off-Road Bikes 6. Resolution #2020-14: Parcel Exchange Agreement with Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District for CSAH 101 Improvements 7. Resolution #2020-15: Haak Property Parcel Transfer to Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District 8. Resolution #2020-16: Approve Entering into a Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT for the Highway 101 Planting Project 9. 2020 Chanhassen Farmers’ Market Agreement 10. 2020 CIP Vehicle Purchases 11. 2020-2024 4th of July Fireworks Contract 12. Highway 101 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District Maintenance Agreement All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan: We have two citizen action request forms on our visitor presentations tonight so if either or both of you are here please step forward. Just your name and address please. Joe Provinzino: My name is Joe Provinzino and my address is 1947 Creek View Court in Chanhassen. My wife, she was the other one so she couldn’t be here tonight so. Mayor Ryan: Okay that’s fine. Joe Provinzino: I guess to start it off with it goes back to December of 2019. Middle of December when the home that was next to me at 8348 Stone Creek has been on the market for over 3 ½ years and had a hard time selling it and it ended up cutting price, cutting price and I think $175,000 is what it was less what they asked for. Well lo and behold around Christmas time we just kept noticing that the influx of people, and different people that are moved in there. Well come to find out it was purchased and it’s the rental VRBO rental home. Well I mean I love to say Chanhassen’s a safe, I’ve been here for 16-17 years in the same address and I built a Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 3 pool and a privacy fence and it’s far from private. I can tell you that right now. During the week and the weekends it’s a party house. I mean I’m here to say that’s what it is with all the photographs and videos I have of ongoing plugging the streets. The partying at nighttime. The late, showing up at 10:00 at night. The garage door, our kitchen window where we eat faces their, you know their side where the garage, you can see everything what goes on so there’s a big porch that sticks out on the back side which is a river and I have a swimming pool and you can get up on that back deck and you can see the back yard of mine looks like Las Vegas and right now I’m very, very fearful that something will happen. So over the week times from December til right now the influx has been higher and higher as far as the rate of people and the return and the traffic so this past weekend I’m not kidding you with the video and the photographs, there was roughly 25 cars parked on the streets. Double breasted inside of the driveway. The coolers on the stairs. On the back deck. It’s a party house and as they are advertising it sleeps 14. It says on street parking. You know it’s just like this does not belong in our neighborhood. We have a neighborhood full of kids riding their bikes which not yet but they will and my biggest concern is that there’s zero care factor. You know it’s a street that has you know a speed limit and there’s in and out, in and out and try to yesterday actually the owner, and they come in there often and they’re cleaning this right because there’s so many people coming in and they advertise no partying. No drinking. No smoking. No you know but that’s far gone from true so 2 weeks ago I came down here and I spoke with an officer and let them know my concerns which she was awesome about and gave me the phone number for the non-emergency because I’m like, I’m not going to be that guy that goes and calls 911. That’s not me so she gave me the number to call for non-emergency so this past weekend all of our neighbors, which most of them were going to come and being the short notice couldn’t make it so I’m like I’m going to do it. So are just beyond themselves. For what we pay in property tax and you know we should not be stuck with that, the way that they’re running a business and I own a business. I would not bring my business to my neighborhood. I would never do that and I don’t think it’s fair for us to be put you know like we need to have surveillance up all the time, which I do. Which I do in my back yard and my whole property, I do have that. Have that but my concern is like yesterday or last night when they were cleaning the owners weren’t so nice so I walked over and I said you know I was on my side of the fence and I said you know excuse me I just kind of want to know what your plan in for this because what happened here from Thursday to Sunday is not okay. So you know they’ve been there 3 months with the home. I’ve been there 16 years and never had any problems with it so I moving forward, like I said I can, all the stuff I have on my telephone I can email it. However I have to get them to you, there’s quite a bit of it but this past weekend was it for you know, the partying and the late nights. Two weeks ago 2:00 in the morning my two dogs were barking because they had people in the driveway outside smoking cigarettes not other than had their hand on my fence so I went downstairs so the, I didn’t open a door because I’m not, you know what I mean? I’m like okay that’s it. You know and we having young kids and a wife and it’s just like this just knowing who’s next to you at all hours and every single day. I mean this thing is booked. They have it priced that you know for 10 bucks you can have a fun weekend with a bunch of people you know so, I guess moving forward I don’t know what the next alternative is and I have looked into the VRBO website where it states that there are a bunch of nuisance clauses that you can submit a bunch of photographs and they have criteria that, on Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 4 their website that you know each owner has to obey by and they have broken them since day one so like I said I don’t know what the next steps are but I just, it’s not a safe and it’s not a fun thing to go through you know. Mayor Ryan: Right. Joe Provinzino: And I’m not here to like I said I own a business and I think everybody has their right to make a dollar but in a sensible way and they are actually I think, I believe so that the homeowners live in either Rogers, Elk River, somewhere up in that area so, and they actually have another property about a mile down the road that they’re doing the same thing to. We found that out as well from the VRBO website. So it’s kind of like well I’m here. I’m a taxpayer in Chan. I know they own it and that too but it’s like not fair or right and you guys wouldn’t believe if you look pass that phone around and saw the influx of cars on both sides of the streets, and how they double park them all the way up the driveway, it’s just like okay. I’m not, either I go or they go. Mayor Ryan: Right. Joe Provinzino: So that’s. Mayor Ryan: Well first of all I’d like to say how much I appreciate you coming here tonight to share this and definitely sense the frustration. I think the best, you asked about next steps. I’ll get to those in one minute but I would for sure encourage you to submit whatever you can online to the VRBO and follow that but in terms of you know what we can do for a city right now is, I would encourage you to be that guy and call that number because that’s really the first, that’s the first kind of plan of action that we will be sharing with you is you know when there are that we have nuisance ordinances that you know that we can enforce so whether it’s parking or noise complaints, etcetera, that’s what you know that’s why we have officers that can go and address that issue. Joe Provinzino: Right. Mayor Ryan: Secondly I will have our current city manager is out of town but I’m going to have Mr. Foster share his business card and then we can follow up with you one on one, city staff to address these more on a one on one basis versus publicly right now but I think there are things that we can do to you know address this concern. Joe Provinzino: Absolutely and what really it’s hard for me being a parent that knowing with kids and the amount of kids I see all the time riding their bikes and playing street hockey and they’re out in a cul-de-sac, we don’t get that second chance. We don’t get it. I mean I have to draw the line somewhere or we don’t get it and I hope that’s not a case but this past weekend if the temperatures were up there and kids were out it wouldn’t have been pretty because it’s just zero care factor. In and out. In and out, in and out and I went to my, I went to work early Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 5 Saturday morning and I counted 12 cars parked out there so this started Thursday. I mean it’s every day of the week but it’s a pattern of Thursday through Sunday. Then they leave Sunday. They come and clean. Then it’s the next, you know it’s just okay turn the page and we’ll move onto the next people that are going to be there you know. Mayor Ryan: Right. Joe Provinzino: And that’s why it really concerns me is because I’m trying to like okay I know if it’s been this bad from December to this past weekend what’s it going to be like because I looked, I mean they have that placed booked for the first 9 days in July. I mean it’s going to be a disaster and I don’t want to be like should of did this earlier. That’s why I’m doing it now so we can figure out you know what can actually happen because the way that they’re going about it is sure not the way that it should be in a neighborhood. Mayor Ryan: And perfectly said and that’s why I think having the conversation with our city staff will help because then we can come up with a plan and work with you and your neighbor to figure out you know how to respond to this so Mr. Foster if you have the business cards, and we have your information so we can follow up but I just want to make sure that you have the cards of city staff and we will follow up with you to make sure that you know we work together to find a solution. Joe Provinzino: Awesome, okay thank you very much. Mayor Ryan: And thank you for coming forward tonight. Appreciate it. Joe Provinzino: Thanks. Am I free to go? Mayor Ryan: You are free to go. Thank you. Joe Provinzino: You bet, thanks. AWARD OF BID FOR SALE OF $6,795,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2020A FOR VARIOUS CITY 2020 AND 2021 UTILITY SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. Mayor Ryan: Next we have new business and Mr. Sticha this is you. Greg Sticha: Good evening Mayor and council. This evening you are being asked to approve the award of bid on $6.795 million general obligation utility revenue bonds. The bids were taken earlier today. These bonds were put into the rate study in last year’s rate study and have been pre-planned for significant capital improvements related to street improvements and a few areas for water and sewer lines and some storm water improvements. In particular these improvements are related to Minnewashta Parkway and the 101 improvement project. The most Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 6 significant portion of the $6.795 is related to those two projects. These bonds are already incorporated into the City’s rate study. They were as a part of last year’s rate study. The issuance of these bonds has no impact on the City’s utility rates. They were already pre-planned as part of that rate study. So what I’m going to do is I’m going to have Nick Anhut from Ehlers and Associates go over a couple items related to this and then at the end I’ll be asking City Council to award the bid of the general obligation utility revenue bonds to Piper Sandler and Company and you can write that down if you’d like or I can give it to you again when we get to the motion. Nick is going to go over three things. He’s first going to go over the City’s rating call with Standard and Poors which took place just over a week ago. He’s also going to go over the results of the bids and then thirdly I’ve asked him to kind of give you guys an update on what’s going on in the market right now. There’s a lot of volatility out there and a lot of people I don’t think quite understand exactly the impacts on, in particular local government so Nick will probably give you a little update and you can ask any questions about what is exactly going on in the markets right now so with that I’ll turn it over to Nick. Nick Anhut: Thank you Greg. Nick Anhut, Ehlers and Associates. Financial advisors to the City of Chanhassen and thank you for the introduction. Before you tonight a packet of information regarding 7 bids received on the purchase of the City’s bonds. As Greg mentioned in anticipation of this these were included within the rate study for the projects identified. We also held a rating call with Standard and Poors who rates the City’s credit. That credit rating helps enhance the viability in the marketplace to purchase these bonds and the City currently carries a AAA rating which is the highest credit rating that Standard and Poors offers. And I’m happy to say that that rating was affirmed with the discussion with Standard and Poors last week. In your packets or in front of you right now is a packet of information that has that credit rating report that Standard and Poors publishes. It accompanies the bonds when an investor goes ahead and purchases these bonds. They can access this report through their broker and it’s very laudatory of the City. I’d say just across the board through all the matrix the analyst were very positive on Chanhassen, not only recent growth within the tax base but also looking forward how you implement your financial policies at the City. Maintaining fund balances and how you fund your operations. If I wanted to express a down side they do express two statements where they state what would happen, what would it take to lower the credit rating of the City and they expressly say a significant increase in debt load. Don’t give a dollar amount unfortunately but it is a significant amount. And then also with deterioration of your fund balances so drawing down upon reserves without replenishing them or getting into an operating situation where your annual revenues are not meeting expenditures for a sustained period of time. Those types of things are going to have to play out over a long course of time but they just note those as far as what it would take if you will to lower the City’s credit rating. A AAA rating really is within the top 7 to 8 percentile among municipalities across the country so it’s a very high level standing and it is the highest rating that S&P awards. With that rating in hand we did received on the City’s behalf 7 different bids to purchase the bonds in the full amount. Prices on those bonds ranged from a low yield of less than 1.17 percent up to about 1.4 percent. These are bonds that are going to repaid over an 11 year term so it equates to about 11 years treasury right now is you know about .7 to .6 percent. Treasury being the highest form of security in the marketplace or at least Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 7 perceived as the highest form of security. We were anticipating about a month ago about 1.7 percent anticipated true interest costs on these bonds so recent events with the Coronavirus as Mr. Sticha mentioned have lowered treasury yields and municipal yields in general. It’s sort of a flight to safety if you will. Investors in the marketplace view municipal bonds and federal treasuries as a safe and fixed investment. It provides a steady cashflow that they can depend on and municipal, municipalities in general have a very low default rate meaning there’s next to nobody defaults on their payments. They make them on time and they’re very predictable. All of that safety translates to the ability to pay a price for that in the form that the don’t need very much return on that investment. They don’t need to charge you an interest rate that’s very high for that safety. With all the events that have taken place in the marketplace over the last 2 weeks, a lot of equities, a lot of you know you see various indices showing that the equity markets are coming down quite a bit, down into that sort of bearish range. All of that capital is flowing somewhere. People selling to get out of those equities to go into things like safe haven investments like municipal bonds and the City just happens to be in the marketplace at that time so that you’re able to you know take advantage of this very low interest rate environment. And so we are very, very much appreciative or very excited if you will in terms of the opportunity for the City because this does lower the cost of your capital quite a bit. A 1.17 percent interest rate is extremely low. It’s near the low it’s been over the course of the last 12 years or so as rates have been in the lowest in the last hundred years. This will lower the overhead associated with the utilities and their funds. It’s about a $55,000 to $60,000 per year difference between what was in the studies that Mr. Sticha mentioned last fall so that will provide you some extra cushion or some buffer to protect, make sure that you don’t have to increase rates beyond what was anticipated in the study and also absorb some additional capital expenditures if they do arise and new investments need to be made within the utility systems so, all in all this will have an effect of lowering your overall or anticipated cost of capital and we’re very much in favor of a recommendation that you do award to Piper Sandler and their proposal this evening. With all that said I’m happy to address any questions or if there’s anything else that you feel I need to address Mr. Sticha but these are very good bids. They are reflective of unfortunately the market environment that we’re all seeing right now but it is a positive spin for the City as far as your borrowing costs. Greg Sticha: I have just one additional item to add. The City’s credit rating is attributed to several factors. You know certainly the Twin Cities economy. The robust housing market. The businesses that the City of Chanhassen has. Those are just a number of the factors that go into our credit rating. In addition to, as I had put in the press release previous city councils financially smart decisions. The current city council’s financially smart management and policies and staff’s following those policies as directed by council so there’s a lot of variables that go into keeping that AAA rating. We’re very pleased to have it and continue to have it and we plan on keeping all of our financial management practices and policies going forward into the future with the direction of City Council. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Sticha. Council any questions for either gentlemen? Alright well thank you for your presentation tonight but I’d also, you stole what I wanted to acknowledge. In Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 8 addition to your guidance, Mr. Anhut I appreciate your guidance as we move through this process but I’d also like to extend our thanks on behalf of council to Mr. Sticha, his department and the recommendations coming from all departments within the City in terms of your fiscal responsibility and management of your departments because you are the ones that bring it to City Council and then we base our decisions based on your recommendation and I know you’re always very diligent and prudent in how you approach running each of your departments so I’d really like to extend our thanks. It is incredible Mr. Sticha how many years have we had a AAA bond rating? Do you know? Greg Sticha: Since 2009 I believe. Mayor Ryan: Okay which is, I mean which is just an a credit to you and former councils and also thanks to the current council for your diligence in reviewing all of our financial decisions and policies as we move through this and make some tough decisions so appreciate your hard work Mr. Sticha and with that if there are no further questions or comments I would stand for a motion. And could you give the name one more time for whoever’s going to make the motion. Greg Sticha: The name of the award of bid goes to Piper Sandler and Company. Councilman McDonald: I’ll do a motion. Mayor Ryan: Alright Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I propose that the City Council adopts a resolution awarding the bid for the general obligation bonds Series 2020A to the low bidder Piper Sandler and Company. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Ryan: With a valid motion and second all those in favor please signify by saying aye. Resolution #2020-17: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council adopts a resolution awarding the bid for the General Obligation Bonds Series 2020A to the low bidder, Piper Sandler and Company. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 5-0. Nick Anhut: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you. Thanks for coming tonight. Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 9 COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS. Mayor Ryan: Before we get to the actual commission appointments we have appointments for the Planning, Park and Rec, Environmental and Senior Commission. I would like to, again on behalf of council I’d like to extend my, our thanks and appreciation for all those that applied. That came in through the interview process. Each and every one of you, one of the reasons why you chose to get involved or apply for the commission is that you wanted to give back and get involved with the City and for that we are truly grateful and appreciative and although we can’t appoint everybody to a commission we would encourage you to stay posted on different events where we need volunteers and participation from the community because we certainly have a lot of events going on in the city and would love to see you at those various events so thank you for your interest in being on a commission and if it didn’t happen this time we encourage you to re- apply the next time and find a way to get involved because we’d love to have you participate. So with that I would stand for a motion for the appointments. Councilwoman Coleman: Yes Madam Mayor and please excuse any butchering of last names that I might do. The City Council appoints the following commissioners. For the Planning Commission Eric Noyes and Mark von Oven for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Park and Recreation Commission Karl Tsuchiya, Haley Pemrick Schubert and Jim Peck for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Environmental Commission Lucy Rehm and Markus Fischer for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Senior Commission Jerry Cerchia and Linda Haight for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023 and David Crouch for a one year term ending March 30, 2021. Mayor Ryan: Alright, thank you Councilwoman Coleman. We have a valid motion, is there a second? Councilman McDonald: Second. Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to make the following commission appointments: For the Planning Commission Eric Noyes and Mark von Oven for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Park and Recreation Commission Karl Tsuchiya, Haley Pemrick Schubert and Jim Peck for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Environmental Commission Lucy Rehm and Markus Fischer for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023. For the Senior Commission Jerry Cerchia and Linda Haight for 3 year terms ending March 30, 2023 and David Crouch for a one year term ending March 30, 2021. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: That motion passes 5-0 and we will send letters and follow up to those that are appointed. To everybody that applied correct? Alright thank you. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. Chanhassen City Council – March 9, 2020 10 ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. Mayor Ryan: I will make one comment on the correspondence. We did submit a letter, a joint letter with Minnetonka Public Schools to both, or to Senator Osmek as well as Representative Morrison about one of our legislative objectives in regards to the roundabout on Highway 41 in front of the Minnetonka Middle School and so we are pursuing this jointly with the Minnetonka School District so we got that letter out last week. With no further comments on the correspondence discussion I would stand for adjournment. A motion to adjourn. Councilwoman Coleman moved, Councilman Campion seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MARCH 9, 2020 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Council members conducted interviews of commission candidates and then discussed commission appointments. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Jake Foster, Charlie Howley, Bob Generous, Greg Sticha, Todd Hoffman, George Bender and Erick Henricksen DISCUSS WARRANTY RADIO REPLACEMENT FOR UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM. Greg Stich presented background information as an informational item only explaining this will be brought back at a future meeting for approval on a plan to replace R450 radio systems with R900 radio systems as the R450’s fail. Mayor Ryan asked for clarification of the warranty costs and replacements before asking staff to prepare a report along with the item when it is brought back for approval. Dan Campion asked for information on competitive companies. KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGY: STUDY AND CONSIDER INFLOW AND INFILTRATION (I&I) INTIATIVES. Erick Henricksen presented highlights of the program objectives from the I&I study, program recommendations regarding sewer updates, education program, and a review of various private property inspection programs currently being used in different communities. Councilwoman Tjornhom asked about including inspection programs with street projects. Mayor Ryan asked how other cities fund the inspection programs. Councilman McDonald asked about getting credit back from Met Council and how to handle houses built prior to 1969. Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 700 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Approve Special City Council Meeting Minutes dated March 20, 2020 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.2. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the minutes from the Special City Council meeting dated March 20, 2020.” Approval requires a . ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES MARCH 20, 2020 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: Mayor Ryan read public announcements outlining actions being taken by the City of Chanhassen during this COVID-19 health pandemic. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2020-18 DECLARING PEACE TIME EMERGENCY DUE TO COVID-19 HEALTH PANDEMIC. Mayor Ryan reviewed highlights of what adoption of this resolution will provide. Resolution #2020-18: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council adopts Resolution 2020-18 declaring a peace time emergency due to COVID-19 health pandemic. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MARCH 20, 2020 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: Mayor Ryan: Tonight we have, I’ll be making a public announcement and then the special meeting is to adopt a resolution declaring peace time emergency but to begin I’d like to read a public announcement. Again Chanhassen good evening. Thank you for joining us. If you can see around the council chambers it looks a little bit different in here as we are adhering to social distancing guidelines. It certainly is a new normal but as we operate in these unprecedented times I want our community to know that we are working diligently to ensure the safety and well being of both our city employees and our residents and businesses. Before I begin going through some of the operational aspects of city function I’d like to say and I have to say how very proud and appreciative I am of our incredible city staff and employees for your continued commitment and hard work on behalf of Chanhassen. You have all jumped into action, remained flexile and positive as we navigate through so much uncertainty. I would also like to say and extends thanks and appreciation to the many residents. Those of you who are first responders, doctors and nurses, the school district and educators who keep in touch with our kids during their time away from school and the local community groups and organizations who are working tirelessly to combat the spread of COVID-19 and support the community needs, especially reaching out and helping those most at risk. In times like these we all in our own way become public servants together for the greater good so again we want to say thank you. Operational it is not business as usual but it is important to know that while the doors of city hall and other facilities have been closed for precautionary measures essential city functions still continue. We have our employees working on varying schedules and in varying locations so I ask for a greater level of patience if response time has slowed. We are doing the best we can to ensure the key functions of city business continue all while these precautionary measures are being taken. We recognize that residents have a variety of questions so please continue to either call city hall or utilize our website for the most current updates, information and department specific operations. On our landing page simply click the COVID-19 bracket which will take you to a very detailed list of overall operations and important phone numbers. We have also created in the last day a list of businesses who are open for business and curbside operations so please continue to support our local businesses. Remember these are the same organizations that support you, your clubs and organizations throughout the year. We are also compiling a list of organizations for volunteer support and this list should be available on our website in the coming days. A few additional key announcements. From county information there have been 3 confirmed cases in the county as of City Council Special Meeting – March 20, 2020 2 today. The cases are travel related. They are not communal spreading. For more public health questions and concerns we ask that you continue to go to the Carver County website and we also have that contact information on our website. The City Manager and I have authorized the Fire Chief to stand up additional duty crew coverage to ensure that we have a stable, consistent response to calls for service in the city of Chanhassen. This means that a small crew of firefighters will be on shift in the main fire station responsible for responding to 911 calls. This will help with potential if they should occur outages and enhance the contingency plans that are already in place. All commission and council meetings have been cancelled until further notice. As this situation is fluid we will make adjustments as needed. If there is a City Council business that needs attention we will follow the practice of publicly posting the meeting 3 days in advance. COVID-19 has not been detected in our or any other municipal drinking water system. There is no evidence that the virus can be transmitted via the water supply and distribution system. The city water supply is safe for drinking, bathing an cooking. The City is and will continue to test our water supply per the Minnesota Department of Health standards. Please do not flush wipes or any substances other than toilet paper in your toilet. Even though a produce may be labeled as flushable they indeed are not. These products including paper towels can clog pipes and pumps and create sewer back up’s even into your home. Thank you for your attention and cooperation in this matter. In these challenging times the City of Chanhassen realizes that some of you, there could be difficulty in paying your city utility bill. We would encourage you to call city hall to set up a payment plan if needed. And I really want to emphasize that this situation can take a toll and cause a heighten sense of mental health related concerns so please contact the Mental Health Crisis Hotline at 952-442-7601 if you need any mental health support. People are there and they are ready to support you so please do not hesitate to call. I’d also like to encourage each of you to reach out to your neighbors to keep in touch with each other. Recognize that there are people who will feel isolated so there has never been a more important time to stay connected to each other. There are so many resources available. Please use them as needed. Finally I want our residents to know that we are not only working closely as a city but we are in daily communication with the County. I am in touch with our neighboring mayors as well as the State and Federal elected leaders. It is imperative that we continue to communicate, work together and prepare for what’s ahead in this critical time. This collaboration is essential for the continuity of services and addressing the needs of our community. Chanhassen we will get through this and we will get through this together. Our commitment to serving the residents and businesses of Chanhassen has never been stronger so please stay home and stay healthy. Thank you. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2020-18 DECLARING PEACE TIME EMERGENCY DUE TO COVID-19 HEALTH PANDEMIC. Mayor Ryan: Next on our agenda is adopting a resolution 2020-18 declaring peace time emergency due to COVID-19 health pandemic. This declaration of emergency activates the City’s emergency organization structure and provides a basis for the City to schedule and conduct meetings by telephone or electronic means. The Declaration of Emergency allows the council to address the pandemic without complying with time consuming procedures and City Council Special Meeting – March 20, 2020 3 formalities before the performance of public work, entering into contracts, incurring obligations, employing temporary workers, renting equipment, purchasing supplies and materials, and the appropriation and expenditure of funds. These situations could assist in non-compliance with city standard requirements related to hiring temporary workers in the event that many are sick or quarantined and avoiding cumbersome contracting requirements under the Uniform Bid law when purchasing emergency supplies related to addressing the pandemic. Because this situation is unique and such measures have been infrequently used and never for a pandemic in recent memory the scenario where these measures will be needed are not clearly known at this time. Having the flexibility provided in the Declaration will allow the City to be flexible and overcome obstacles in complying with statutory and ordinance requirements as each new issue is presented. Council are there any questions or a motion for the adoption of this resolution? Councilman McDonald: Madam Mayor I’ll make a motion. I would move that the City Council adopts Resolution 2020-18 declaring a peace time emergency due to the COVID-19 health pandemic. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Resolution #2020-18: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council adopts Resolution 2020-18 declaring a peace time emergency due to COVID-19 health pandemic. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayo r Ryan: That motion carries 5-0. That is the only thing on our agenda but if there are any council members that would like to make any statements before adjourning I will entertain that or I will entertain a motion to adjourn. Councilman McDonald: Madam Mayor if I could I would like to make a statement. One of the things I noticed on my way here today is that the citizens are getting out. They’re walking on the trails. I think they’re trying to make the best of the weather and the best of a bad situation. I’ve had a number of people contact me that they are being harmed financially by this. Jobs are being furloughed. Yesterday we had to vote with Southwest Transit to begin to reduce services and reduction in services meant that we’re in the process of having to lay off workers. That was not something that came easy just like I’m sure for the residents here their employers did not make those decisions easily. I’m hoping that this will last only a short time. That we can get through this together but again what I saw today does kind of I think give me a little bit of joy that people are not going to be defeated around here. We’re going to get out. Enjoy our city. Our trails. Our parks. Again with caution and with the new rules of social norms that we’re now all adopting to so I think there is hope with all of this. That I do not see our residents being defeated by this and so I’m glad to see this so I just want to say thank you to the residents for again City Council Special Meeting – March 20, 2020 4 understanding why we’re acting the way we are. Why the situation is what it is and hopefully we’ll get through this together and then we’ll be a strong city and community for it. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilman McDonald. Any motion for adjournment? Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020­XX: Municipal State Aid Street Funds Advance Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.3. Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public Works/City Engineer File No: n/a PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a Resolution to request an advance for financing 2020 Municipal State Aid Street Construction Projects.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subd. 6 provides for municipalities to make advances from future year's allocations for the purpose of expediting construction.  This process not only helps reduce the MnDOT construction cash balance, but also allows municipalities to fund projects that may have been delayed due to funding shortages. A resolution passed by the Municipality is required to request an advance.  Advances are only good for one year. DISCUSSION The process used for advancing is dependent on three (3) Code levels of the MnDOT construction cash balance, Red (severe), Yellow (Guarded), and Green (Low).  Currently the Code level is Green which means the construction cash balance is at an acceptable level to approve advances. The latest version of the City's MSA fund balance spreadsheet is attached which shows the need for the advance request.  The City's CIP includes an identified Annual Street Improvement Program (ST­012) which shows the MSA revenue source for eligible projects we have planned in 2020, the CIP sheet is attached. Should MnDOT not agree to the advance request or should the Council not approve the advance request resolution, other means of financing the identified projects will need to be developed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this Resolution. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: Municipal State Aid Street Funds AdvanceSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.3.Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of PublicWorks/City Engineer File No: n/aPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a Resolution to request an advance for financing 2020 Municipal State Aid StreetConstruction Projects.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDMinnesota Statutes 162.14, Subd. 6 provides for municipalities to make advances from future year's allocations forthe purpose of expediting construction.  This process not only helps reduce the MnDOT construction cash balance,but also allows municipalities to fund projects that may have been delayed due to funding shortages.A resolution passed by the Municipality is required to request an advance.  Advances are only good for one year.DISCUSSIONThe process used for advancing is dependent on three (3) Code levels of the MnDOT construction cash balance, Red(severe), Yellow (Guarded), and Green (Low).  Currently the Code level is Green which means the construction cashbalance is at an acceptable level to approve advances.The latest version of the City's MSA fund balance spreadsheet is attached which shows the need for the advancerequest.  The City's CIP includes an identified Annual Street Improvement Program (ST­012) which shows the MSArevenue source for eligible projects we have planned in 2020, the CIP sheet is attached.Should MnDOT not agree to the advance request or should the Council not approve the advance request resolution,other means of financing the identified projects will need to be developed.RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this Resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 20­XX MSA Fund Balance Spreadsheet CIP Sheets CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: _________________________________RESOLUTION NO:_____________________ MOTION BY:___________________________SECONDED BY:_______________________ RESOLUTION FOR MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS ADVANCE FOR 2020 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WHEREAS, the Municipality of Chanhassen is planning to implement Municipal State Aid Street Project(s) in 2020 which will require State Aid funds in excess of those available in its State Aid Construction Account; and WHEREAS, said Municipality is prepared to proceed with construction of said project(s) through the use of an advance from the Municipal State Aid Street Fund to supplement the available funds in its State Aid Construction Account; and WHEREAS, the advance is based on the following determination of estimated expenditures: Account Balance as of March 3, 2020 $ 991,267.12 Less estimated disbursements: Project #20-02 Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation (SAP 194-111-002) $ 1,150,000.00 Project #20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation (SAP 194-101-014) $ 550,000.00 Project #PW31a Powers Boulevard & Lake Lucy Road Pedestrian Improvements (SAP 194-020-016 and SAP 010-617-024) $ 420,000.00 Project #PW192H TH 212 FYA Signal Improvements (SAP 010-030-009) $ 54,000.00 Total Estimated Disbursement $ 2,174,000.00 Advance Amount (amount in excess of acct. balance) $ 1,182,732.88 Rounded up to nearest 100k $ 1,200,000.00 WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14 Subd. 6 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820.1500, Subp. 10b; and WHEREAS, the Municipality acknowledges advance funds are released on a first-come- first-serve basis and this resolution does not guarantee the availability of funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Project(s) of the Municipality of Chanhassen in an amount up to $1.2M. I hereby authorize repayments from subsequent accruals to the Municipal State Aid Street Construction Account of said Municipality of future year allocations until fully repaid. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council on this ____ day of March, 2020. ATTEST: _______________________________ _______________________________ Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT G:\ENG\MSA\Fund Balance\MSA Fund Balance City of Chanhassen, City # 194 Date:3/20/2020 Municipal State Aid Construction Fund Account Estimated Yearly Expenditures and Balances Assumes State Aid has sufficient funds to Advance Maximum Advancement $4M Year 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Beginning Fund Balance $779,530 -$1,182,733 -$3,462,876 -$3,462,555 -$3,230,856 -$3,766,838 -$4,735,932 Allocation (assume 3% adjustment annually)$985,881 $1,015,457 $1,045,921 $1,077,299 $1,109,618 $1,142,906 $1,177,193 Programmed Expenditure $2,860,363 $3,295,600 $1,045,600 $845,600 $1,645,600 $2,112,000 $0 Encumbered $87,781 Ending Fund Balance -$1,182,733 -$3,462,876 -$3,462,555 -$3,230,856 -$3,766,838 -$4,735,932 -$3,558,738 Powers/Lake Lucy Ped Xing Lake Drive E. & Great Plains Avienda (Bluff Creek Drive)TH41/82nd St. Signal Bluff Creek Drive 420,000$ 500,000$ $900,000 100,000$ 1,500,000$ Minnewashta Pkwy Minnewashta Pkwy Market Blvd Pleasantview Road 1,150,000$ 1,150,000$ 600,000$ 2,000,000$ 212 Flashing Yellow Lyman (Galpin to TH41)Lyman (Galpin to TH41)Lyman (Galpin to TH41)Lyman (Galpin to TH41)Lyman (Galpin to TH41) 54,000$ 1,645,600$ 145,600$ 145,600$ 145,600$ 112,000$ Lake Drive East 686,363$ Lake Lucy Road 550,000$ Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2020 2024thru Department Street Improvements Description Annual project to rehabilitate and reconstruct streets in the City. The following streets are scheduled to be completed in 2020, future areas will be determined by available funds and condition of the streets. 2020 Minnewashta Parkway (MSA, 2020 & 2021) and Lake Lucy-TH41 to Galpin Blvd (MSA) Krvers Point, Willow View, Twin Maple and Basswood Stone Creek Drive, Boulder Road, Stone Creek Ct, Stone Creek Ln, etc. Hidden Lane, Hidden Circle, Hidden Court, Marsh Drive, Sinnen Circle and Dakota Lane Lake Lucy, Nez Perce, Vineland Court and Troendle Circle Brendan Court Project #ST-012 Priority n/a Justification The City uses a Pavement Management System to monitor the condition of the City streets. While proper preventative maintenance extends the life of the street and is cost effective, a street will eventually deteriorate to a point that major maintenance is required. Rehabilitation projects extend the life of the street. In cases when utilities or poor sub grade needs to be replaced or where streets have deteriorated to a point where rehabilitation will no longer be practical, reconstruction of the street is necessary. A feasibility study is written to consider the merits of the project and scope of work. Budget Impact/Other This project may decrease maintenance costs. Useful Life Unassigned Project Name Annual Street Improvement Program Category Streets/Highways Type Improvement Account #2 Account #1 601-xxxx-4751 Total Project Cost:$56,694,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20202021202220232024Expenditures 30,664,0006,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000Construction 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total Total20202021202220232024FundingSources 17,620,0002,582,500 3,637,500 3,700,000 3,800,000 3,900,000Assessment/Revolving Assess Fund 3,333,0001,716,500 1,516,500 100,000MSA 1,685,000192,500 517,500 325,000 325,000 325,000SewerUtilityFund 2,771,000185,500 785,500 600,000 600,000 600,000SurfaceWaterUtilityFund 5,255,0001,550,000 1,605,000 700,000 700,000 700,000WaterUtilityFund 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total 89 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Approve Arbor Day Poster Contest Winners Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.4. Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Coordinator File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council approves the nominated list of students as the 2020 Arbor Day Poster Contest Winners.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND This year’s Arbor Day Poster Contest, organized by the Environmental Commission, received entries from the 5th grade classes at Bluff Creek Elementary, St. Hubert School and Chapel Hill Academy.The theme for this year’s contest was “Trees are Terrific…In Chanhassen! Celebrating 20 years of Arbor Day.”The Environmental Commission chose the winners at their regular meeting in March.The selected grand prize winner is Esther Gilbertson. The runners­up are from each school and include Ryleigh Barber, Mary Cushman, Amanda Springer, Noah Escolero, Audrey Krone, Aevaleen Hesse, Lydia Katz, Lillian Katz, and Delaney Mirau. DISCUSSION The Environmental Commission requests that the City Council approve the list of winners.The presentation of awards will be postponed to a later date when distancing restrictions due to the pandemic are no longer in place. It is tentatively scheduled for June 8.  The grand prize winner will receive a gift certificate for a potted tree donated by The Garden By The Woods and her poster will be framed and hung in city hall.The runners­up will be presented with Minnesota Tree Identification guides. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the 2020 Arbor Day poster contest winners: Esther Gilbertson, Ryleigh Barber, Mary Cushman, Amanda Springer, Noah Escolero, Audrey Krone, Aevaleen Hesse, Lydia Katz, Lillian Katz, and Delaney Mirau. ATTACHMENTS: Selected 2020 Arbor Day Poster Contest Grand Prize Winner CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020­XX: Approve Consultant Agreement for Materials Testing on City Project 20­ 02, Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.5. Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­02 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a a Resolution approving a consultant agreement for materials testing on Project No. 20­02 Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The 20­02 Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project requires a separate contract be awarded by the city for materials testing and engineering services in order to provide the required quality assurance testing set forth in the project documents and city specifications. DISCUSSION The Engineering department solicited proposals from American Engineering Testing, Inc., WSB and Associates, and Braun Intertec Corporation for the materials testing and engineering services required for the project.  This contract and project will span two years. All three firms submitted proposals and they are as follows: American Engineering Testing ­ $27,086.00 WSB and Associates ­ $26,250.00 Braun Intertec ­ $24,846.00 The proposals were reviewed to compare the proposed work scopes, testing rates, and estimated costs. This also included review of the level of effort and clarity of each firm's proposal in meeting the specifications of the project. All firms have the required certified personnel, are capable of completing the required work, and have successfully completed past work for the city.  Based on the review of the proposals, staff recommends that Braun Intertec be selected for the work. Braun Intertec's contract is on a unit­cost basis and billed per personnel hours and tests at set rates provided in their proposal.  They will submit monthly invoices that staff will review before processing.  Staff will review the invoices for accuracy and conformance with the contract. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: Approve Consultant Agreement for Materials Testing on City Project 20­02, Minnewashta Parkway RehabilitationSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.5.Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­02PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a a Resolution approving a consultant agreement for materials testing on Project No.20­02 Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe 20­02 Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project requires a separate contract be awarded by the city formaterials testing and engineering services in order to provide the required quality assurance testing set forth in theproject documents and city specifications.DISCUSSIONThe Engineering department solicited proposals from American Engineering Testing, Inc., WSB and Associates, andBraun Intertec Corporation for the materials testing and engineering services required for the project.  This contractand project will span two years. All three firms submitted proposals and they are as follows:American Engineering Testing ­ $27,086.00WSB and Associates ­ $26,250.00Braun Intertec ­ $24,846.00The proposals were reviewed to compare the proposed work scopes, testing rates, and estimated costs. This alsoincluded review of the level of effort and clarity of each firm's proposal in meeting the specifications of the project. Allfirms have the required certified personnel, are capable of completing the required work, and have successfullycompleted past work for the city.  Based on the review of the proposals, staff recommends that Braun Intertec beselected for the work.Braun Intertec's contract is on a unit­cost basis and billed per personnel hours and tests at set rates provided in their proposal.  They will submit monthly invoices that staff will review before processing.  Staff will review the invoices for accuracy and conformance with the contract. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Braun Intertec Proposal CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 13, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR MATERIALS TESTING ON PROJECT NO. 20-02 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY REHABILITIATION WHEREAS, pursuant to a request for proposals for the materials testing required for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation project, three proposals were received, evaluated, and complied with the request: Total Bid American Engineering Testing $27,086.00 WSB and Associates $26,250.00 Braun Intertec $24,846.00 AND WHEREAS, it was evaluated by staff that Braun Intertec had the lowest quote and best met the scope of the request for proposals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Braun Intertec in the name of the City of Chanhassen for the materials testing required for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 20-02 according to the proposal and the plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com March 19, 2020 Proposal QTB116914 Mr. Steve Ferraro City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Proposal for Construction Materials Testing Services Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project No. 2020-02 S.A.P. 194-111-002 Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Ferraro: Braun Intertec Corporation is pleased to submit this revised proposal to provide construction materials testing services for the Minnewashta Parkway Rehabilitation Project in Chanhassen, Minnesota. We have completed the geotechnical evaluation for this project, so we have a unique understanding of the site and construction challenges. We can aid the construction team by applying this experience and transferring our knowledge developed during the design phase which will provide professional continuity to the construction. Our work on the project to date gives us familiarity with the project team and design development which allows us to understand some of the considerations used when developing the project’s design. Since our inception in 1957, we have grown into one of the largest employee owned engineering firms in the nation. With more than 1,000 employee owners, retaining our firm gives you access to a diverse range of services and professionals you can consult with if the unforeseen occurs. The size of our company also allows us to respond quickly when schedule constraints occur. Our Understanding of Project We understand this project will include two different typical sections as Minnewashta Parkway is reconstructed from West 77th Street to Minnesota Trunk Highway (TH) 7. The majority of the corridor’s typical section will include full depth reclaiming the existing bituminous and aggregate base to form the new base material and placement of bituminous pavement. The second typical section will occur in the sub-grade correction area approximately four hundred and fifty feet long starting at Station 32+00. This typical section will include eighteen inches of open graded aggregate base with a two inch choker coarse and geotextile fabric, along with twelve inches of aggregate base or reclaim before placement of five inches bituminous pavement. We understand this project will be completed in two phases with the first phase in 2020 and the second phase being constructed in 2021. New concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, along with a new bituminous trail and improvements to the watermain, sanitary, and storm sewer utilities will also be a part of this project. City of Chanhassen Proposal QTB116914 March 19, 2020 Page 2 This is a City of Chanhassen project with state-aid funding. Projects that are constructed with state-aid funding are required to perform Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC/QA) testing in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s (MnDOT’s) 2018 Standard Specifications for Construction along with MnDOT’s Schedule of Materials Control. This project is using MnDOT’s 2019 State Aid for Local Transportation (SALT) Schedule of Materials Control. Personnel with MnDOT certifications must complete the monitoring and testing. Braun Intertec will perform the QA field testing on the project as listed in our scope of services and as shown on our attached cost estimate table. The contractor will be responsible for performing all of the required QC testing and submitting all the documentation upon completion of the project. An audit of the project could be conducted upon completion. The audit may include reviewing tests and paperwork provided by your QC/QA representative. Available Project Information This revised proposal was prepared using the following documents and information.  Project plans and specifications prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc., dated February 10, 2020. Braun Intertec Project Personnel For this project, we will provide technicians that are MnDOT certified in each specialized field. We have many MnDOT certified employees. For the proposed scope of services, our staff will have the following certifications:  Aggregate Production  Grading & Base I  Concrete Field I  Bituminous Street  MnDOT or ACI Strength Testing Accredited Laboratory In the SALT 2019 Schedule of Material Control, which is part of this project’s testing requirements, MnDOT requires laboratories performing acceptance tests for payment to be accredited by the AASHTO Resource (formerly AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory [AMRL]) for all test procedures performed. Scope of Services - Baseline Testing services will be performed on an on-call, as-needed basis as requested and scheduled by you or your on-site project personnel. Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following services. City of Chanhassen Proposal QTB116914 March 19, 2020 Page 3 Soil Related Services  Perform nuclear density gauge tests on utility and retaining wall backfill materials.  Perform MnDOT Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) tests on aggregate base and full depth reclaim materials.  Perform moisture content tests at time of compaction on utility backfill, aggregate base, retaining wall backfill, and full depth reclaim materials.  Perform gradation tests on coarse filter aggregate, retaining wall backfill, aggregate base, open graded aggregate base, and full depth reclamation materials.  Perform laboratory standard Proctor tests on backfill and fill materials.  Prepare the preliminary and final grading and base report along with assembling the random sampling locations report for the aggregate base and open graded aggregate base materials according to MnDOT Specifications.  Observe and evaluate the soils exposed in the bottoms of excavations to determine if the soils are similar to those encountered with the geotechnical evaluation and suitable for support of fill, foundations or pavements. Our engineer can provide consultation for conditions that appear to differ from the geotechnical evaluation. Concrete Field Testing Related Services  Sample and test the plastic concrete for slump, air content, temperature prior to placement. We assume that we will be able to appropriately dispose of excess concrete (and associated wash water) on site at no additional cost to us.  Prepare 4-inch by 8-inch cylinders for compressive strength testing. A set of four laboratory cured cylinders will be cast and tested for each set cast, one at seven days and three at twenty-eight days. If field cure cylinders are requested, each additional cylinder will be charged at the unit price listed in our cost estimate.  Measure and report the compressive strength of the concrete test cylinders for compliance with the project documents.  Develop the Weekly Concrete Reports for the Project Engineer’s review and their submittal to MnDOT’s Concrete Office. Bituminous Related Services  Collect one verification sample per mix per day of production. Perform quality assurance tests on these samples which include Rice specific gravity, asphalt content, extracted aggregate gradation, gyratory density, coarse aggregate angularity, and fine aggregate angularity. City of Chanhassen Proposal QTB116914 March 19, 2020 Page 4 Alternate A - Bituminous Coring Scope of Services As the project specifications give the engineer the option for nuclear density testing or cutting and evaluating bituminous cores for thickness and density we have included Alternate A for the bituminous coring option. Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following services.  Randomly determine and mark pavement core locations.  Observe the contractor coring in accordance with MnDOT’s specifications.  Collect companion cores and test for thickness and density of pavement cores. Reporting and Project Management Test results will be issued weekly for the project as the various tasks are performed. If, at any time, there are failing tests which do not appear to be in accordance with the plans and specifications or MnDOT’s Schedule of Materials Control, we will notify the engineer’s representative and any others that we are directed to notify. Before the final project closeout, we will issue a final report. The report will include the following:  Braun Intertec technician roster for technicians that conducted testing on the project.  Completed MnDOT Materials Certification Exceptions Summary for items tested by Braun Intertec.  Completed Preliminary and Final Grading and Base Report.  Moisture, Density, DCP, Proctor and Gradation tests.  Concrete mix designs.  Weekly concrete reports.  Concrete compressive strength results.  Completed test reports for samples sent to the MnDOT Materials Lab.  Bituminous mix designs.  Bituminous verification test results.  Copies of concrete and bituminous plant certifications. Basis of Scope of Work- Baseline City of Chanhassen Proposal QTB116914 March 19, 2020 Page 5 The costs associated with the proposed scope of services were estimated using the following assumptions. If the construction schedule is modified or the contractor completes the various phases of the project at different frequencies or durations than shown in this proposal, we may need to adjust the overall cost accordingly. The scope of work and number of trips required to perform these services are as shown in the attached table. Notable assumptions in developing our estimate include:  Compaction testing will be performed using the nuclear gauge method on utility and retaining backfill material; a minimum of three tests will be conducted each trip with eleven trips assumed.  We assume compaction testing on aggregate base and full depth reclamation materials will be performed using the MnDOT Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) method; a minimum of four tests will be conducted each trip with six trips assumed.  We assume twelve sets of concrete tests will be required to complete the project.  We assume the rebar observations before concrete placements will be completed by the project representative’s construction oversight manager.  Bituminous paving will be completed in nine days for this project.  We understand MnDOT Metro Inspections will perform concrete batch plant monitoring and testing for this project.  We understand MnDOT Metro Inspections will perform bituminous plant monitoring and testing for this project.  We understand the project specification for bituminous compaction is the ordinary compaction method with the contractor performing the growth curve and rolling pattern and spot checks with the nuclear density gauge.  We understand the full time onsite inspector will perform the test rolling observations for this project.  We assume the project engineer of record will review and approve the contractor’s quality control submittals and test results.  You, or others you may designate, will provide us with current and approved plans and specifications for the project. Modification to these plans must also be sent to us so we can review their incorporation into the work.  We will require a minimum of 24 hours’ notice for scheduling inspections for a specific time. Shorter than 24 hours’ notice may impact our ability to perform the requested services, and the associated impacts will be the responsibility of others. If the work is completed at different rates than described above, this proposal should be revised. City of Chanhassen Proposal QTB116914 March 19, 2020 Page 6 Basis of Scope of Work Alternate A- Bituminous Coring  We assume eight trips will be needed to mark and observe coring.  We understand one companion core per lot is needed per the specification and have included longitudinal cores in our estimate.  We assume MnDOT Metro Inspections Plant Monitoring will observe the core testing at the quality control plant.  We understand per MnDOT 2360 the contractor will provide the coring equipment. Cost and Invoicing We will furnish the services described herein for an estimated fee of $24,846 and alternate A for $4,136 for a total of $28,982 if Alternate A is selected. Our estimated costs are based on industry averages for construction production. Depending on the contractor’s performance, our costs may be significantly reduced or slightly higher than estimated. A tabulation showing our estimated hourly and/or unit rates associated with our proposed scope of services is also attached. Additional Services and Overtime It is difficult to estimate all of the services, and the quantity of each service, that will be required for any project. Our services are also directly controlled by the schedule and performance of others. For these reasons, our actual hourly or unit quantities and associated fees may vary from those reported herein. If the number of hours or units ultimately required exceed those assumed for purposes of this proposal, they will be invoiced at the hourly or unit rates shown in the attached tabulation. If services are ultimately required that have not been identified or described herein, they will be invoiced in accordance with our current Schedule of Charges. Prior to exceeding our estimated fees, we will update you regarding the progress of our work. This cost estimate was developed with the understanding that the scope of services defined herein will be required and requested during our normal work hours of 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Services that we are asked to provide to meet the project requirements or the contractor’s construction schedule outside our normal work hours will be invoiced using an overtime rate factor. The factor for services provided outside our normal work hours or on Saturday will be 1.25 times the normal hourly rate for the service provided. The factor for services provided on Sunday or legal holidays will be 1.5 times the normal hourly rate for the service provided. You will be billed only for services provided on a time and material basis. City of Chanhassen Proposal QTB116914 March 19, 2020 Page 7 General Remarks We will be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further and clarify the various scope components. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you. After reviewing this proposal, please sign and return one copy to our office as notification of acceptance and authorization to proceed. If anything in this proposal is not consistent with your requirements, please let us know immediately. Braun Intertec will not release any written reports until we have received a signed agreement. Also, ordering services from Braun Intertec constitutes acceptance of the terms of this proposal including the attached General Conditions. The proposed fee is based on the scope of services described and the assumption that our services will be authorized within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule. City of Chanhassen Proposal QTB116914 March 19, 2020 Page 8 We include the Braun Intertec General Conditions, which provide additional terms and are a part of our agreement. To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss our approach to this project further, please contact Andrew Valerius at 952.995.2242 (avalerius@braunintertec.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Andrew M. Valerius Account Leader, Senior Project Manager Charles M. Cadenhead, Jr., PE Vice President, Principal Engineer Attachments: Cost Estimate Table General Conditions – CMT (1/1/18) The proposal is accepted. We will reimburse you in accordance with this agreement, and you are authorized to proceed: ALTERNATE A is selected: YES NO (Circle One) Authorizer’s Firm Authorizer’s Signature Authorizer’s Name (please print or type) Authorizer’s Title Date Client:Service Description:Work Site Address: Minnewashta Parkway between West 77th Street and TH 7 Chanhassen, MN 55317 City of Chanhassen Steve Ferraro 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 financedept@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Construction Materials Testing City Project No. 2020-02 Description Quantity Units Unit Price Extension Phase 1 MnDOT Testing Activity 1.1 Soil Testing $9,073.00 207 Compaction Testing - Nuclear 27.50 Hour 80.00 $2,200.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Utilities- Open Cut 5.00 Trips 2.50 12.50 Retaining Wall Backfill 1.00 Trip 2.50 2.50 Utilities- Pit Backfill 5.00 Trips 2.50 12.50 1308 Nuclear moisture-density meter charge, per hour 27.50 Each 24.00 $660.00 217 Compaction Testing - DCP's 18.00 Hour 80.00 $1,440.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Full Depth Reclamation/ Agg Base 6.00 Trips 3.00 18.00 1530AG Asphalt Content of Aggregate Base, per sample 1.00 Each 150.00 $150.00 126 Project Engineer 3.00 Hour 160.00 $480.00 209 Sample pick-up 8.00 Hour 80.00 $640.00 1318 Moisture Density Relationship (Proctor)4.00 Each 185.00 $740.00 1688AG Percent Crushed, Aggregate Base, per sample Each 80.00 $.00 1686 Lithological Count, per sample Each 134.00 $.00 1698 Los Angeles Abrasion, per sample 1.00 Each 134.00 $134.00 1722 Insoluble residue (MNDOT 1221)1.00 Each 689.00 $689.00 1162 Sieve Analysis with 200 wash, per sample 10.00 Each 134.00 $1,340.00 1861 CMT Trip Charge 20.00 Each 30.00 $600.00 Activity 1.2 Concrete Testing $4,860.00 261 Concrete Testing 30.00 Hour 80.00 $2,400.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Curb & Gutter 6.00 Trips 2.50 15.00 Flatwork 6.00 Trips 2.50 15.00 1364 Compressive strength of concrete cylinders, per specimen 48.00 Each 30.00 $1,440.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Curb & Gutter 6.00 Sets 4.00 24.00 Flatwork 6.00 Sets 4.00 24.00 278 Concrete Cylinder Pick up 6.00 Hour 80.00 $480.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Cylinder Pickup 6.00 Trips 1.00 6.00 1861 CMT Trip Charge 18.00 Each 30.00 $540.00 Activity 1.3 Pavement Testing $7,461.00 2689 MnDOT Bituminous Verification, per sample 9.00 Each 679.00 $6,111.00 209 Sample pick-up 13.50 Hour 80.00 $1,080.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Verification Split Sample and Core Pick-Up 9.00 Trips 1.50 13.50 Page 1 of 203/17/2020 09:19 AM Project Proposal QTB116914 City of Chanhassen - Minnewashta Pkwy Rehab SAP 194-111-002 Proposal Total:$28,982.00 1861 CMT Trip Charge 9.00 Each 30.00 $270.00 Activity 1.4 Project Management $3,452.00 226 Project Manager 14.00 Hour 160.00 $2,240.00 1230 MnDOT Final Report 1.00 Each 500.00 $500.00 228 Senior Project Manager 1.00 Hour 180.00 $180.00 238 Project Assistant 7.00 Hour 76.00 $532.00 Phase 1 Total:$24,846.00 Phase 2 Alternate A- Bituminous Coring Activity 2.1 Alternate A- Bituminous Coring $4,136.00 221 Bituminous Coring 16.00 Hour 102.00 $1,632.00 Work Activity Detail Qty Units Hrs/Unit Extension Mark & Observe Contractor Coring & Sample Pick-up 8.00 Trips 2.00 16.00 1861 CMT Trip Charge 8.00 Each 20.00 $160.00 238 Project Assistant 1.50 Hour 76.00 $114.00 226 Project Manager 3.00 Hour 160.00 $480.00 1542 Thickness and Density of Bituminous Core 35.00 Each 50.00 $1,750.00 Phase 2 Total:$4,136.00 Page 2 of 203/17/2020 09:19 AM Project Proposal QTB116914 City of Chanhassen - Minnewashta Pkwy Rehab SAP 194-111-002 General Conditions Construction Material Testing and Special Inspections GC-CMT Page 1 of 2 Section 1: Agreement 1.1 Our agreement with you consists of these General Conditions and the accompanying written proposal or authorization (“Agreement”). This Agreement is the entire agreement between you and us. It supersedes prior agreements. It may be modified only in a writing signed by us, making specific reference to the provision modified. 1.2 The words “you,” “we,” “us,” and “our” include officers, employees, and subcontractors. 1.3 In the event you use a purchase order or other documentation to authorize our scope of work (“Services”), any conflicting or additional terms are not part of this Agreement. Directing us to start work prior to execution of this Agreement constitutes your acceptance. If, however, mutually acceptable terms cannot be established, we have the right to terminate this Agreement without liability to you or others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. Section 2: Our Responsibilities 2.1 We will provide Services specifically described in this Agreement. You agree that we are not responsible for services that are not expressly included in this Agreement. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, our findings, opinions, and recommendations will be provided to you in writing. You agree not to rely on oral findings, opinions, or recommendations without our written approval. 2.2 In performing our professional services, we will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of our profession practicing in the same locality. If you direct us to deviate from our recommended procedures, you agree to hold us harmless from claims, damages, and expenses arising out of your direction. If during the one year period following completion of Services it is determined that the above standards have not been met and you have promptly notified us in writing of such failure, we will perform, at our cost, such corrective services as may be necessary, within the original scope in this Agreement, to remedy such deficiency. Remedies set forth in this section constitute your sole and exclusive recourse with respect to the performance or quality of Services. 2.3 We will reference our field observations and sampling to available reference points, but we will not survey, set, or check the accuracy of those points unless we accept that duty in writing. Locations of field observations or sampling described in our report or shown on our sketches are based on information provided by others or estimates made by our personnel. You agree that such dimensions, depths, or elevations are approximations unless specifically stated otherwise in the report. You accept the inherent risk that samples or observations may not be representative of things not sampled or seen and further that site conditions may vary over distance or change over time. 2.4 Our duties do not include supervising or directing your representatives or contractors or commenting on, overseeing, or providing the means and methods of their services unless expressly set forth in this Agreement. We will not be responsible for the failure of your contractors, and the providing of Services will not relieve others of their responsibilities to you or to others. 2.5 We will provide a health and safety program for our employees, but we will not be responsible for contractor, owner, project, or site health or safety. 2.6 You will provide, at no cost to us, appropriate site safety measures as to work areas to be observed or inspected by us. Our employees are authorized by you to refuse to work under conditions that may be unsafe. 2.7 Unless a fixed fee is indicated, our price is an estimate of our project costs and expenses based on information available to us and our experience and knowledge. Such estimates are an exercise of our professional judgment and are not guaranteed or warranted. Actual costs may vary. You should allow a contingency in addition to estimated costs. Section 3: Your Responsibilities 3.1 You will provide us with prior environmental, geotechnical and other reports, specifications, plans, and information to which you have access about the site. You agree to provide us with all plans, changes in plans, and new information as to site conditions until we have completed Services. 3.2 You will provide access to the site. In the performance of Services some site damage is normal even when due care is exercised. We will use reasonable care to minimize damage to the site. We have not included the cost of restoration of damage in the estimated charges. 3.3 If we notify you that radiographic or gamma ray equipment or other nuclear testing or measuring device will be used, you will be responsible for the cooperation of your employees and your contractors in observing all radiation safety standards. 3.4 You will notify us of any knowledge or suspicion of the presence of hazardous or dangerous materials present on any work site. If we observe or suspect the presence of contaminants not anticipated in this Agreement, we may terminate Services without liability to you or to others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 3.5 The time our field personnel spend on the job site depends upon the scheduling of the work we are observing or testing. You agree that any changes in scheduling may result in additional costs and agree to pay for those services at the rates listed in our cost estimate. 3.6 You agree to include us as an indemnified party in your contracts, if any, for work by others on the project, protecting us to the same degree as you are protected. You agree to list us as an Additional Insured under your liability insurance policies and to require subrogation be waived against us and that we will be added as an Additional Insured on all policies of insurance, including any policies required of your contractors or subcontractors, covering any construction or development activities to be performed on the project site. Section 4: Reports and Records 4.1 Unless you request otherwise, we will provide our report(s) in an electronic format. 4.2 Our reports, notes, calculations, and other documents and our computer software and data are instruments of our service to you, and they remain our property. We hereby grant you a license to use the reports and related information we provide only for the related project and for the purposes disclosed to us. You may not transfer our reports to others or use them for a purpose for which they were not prepared without our written approval. You agree to indemnify, defend, and hold us harmless from claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of such a transfer or use. 4.3 If you do not pay for Services in full as agreed, we may retain work not yet delivered to you and you agree to return to us all of our work that is in your possession or under your control. 4.4 Electronic data, reports, photographs, samples, and other materials provided by you or others may be discarded or returned to you, at our discretion, unless within 15 days of the report date you give us written direction to store or transfer the materials at your expense. Section 5: Compensation 5.1 You will pay for Services as stated in this Agreement. If such payment references our Schedule of Charges, the invoicing will be based upon the most current schedule. An estimated amount is not a firm figure. You agree to pay all sales taxes and other taxes based on your payment of our compensation. Our performance is subject to credit approval and payment of any specified retainer. 5.2 You will notify us of billing disputes within 15 days. You will pay undisputed portions of invoices upon receipt. You agree to pay interest on unpaid balances beginning 30 days after invoice dates at the rate of 1.5% per month, or at the maximum rate allowed by law. 5.3 If you direct us to invoice a third party, we may do so, but you agree to be responsible for our compensation unless the third party is GC-CMT Revised 1/1/2018 Page 2 of 2 creditworthy (in our sole opinion) and provides written acceptance of all terms of this Agreement. 5.4 Your obligation to pay for Services under this Agreement is not contingent on your ability to obtain financing, governmental or regulatory agency approval, permits, final adjudication of any lawsuit, your successful completion of any project, receipt of payment from a third party, or any other event. No retainage will be withheld. 5.5 If you do not pay us in accordance with this Agreement, you agree to reimburse all costs and expenses for collection of the moneys invoiced, including but not limited to attorney fees and staff time. 5.6 You agree to compensate us in accordance with our Schedule of Charges if we are asked or required to respond to legal process arising out of a proceeding related to the project and as to which we are not a party. 5.7 If we are delayed by factors beyond our control, or if project conditions or the scope or amount of work changes, or if changed labor conditions result in increased costs, decreased efficiency, or delays, or if the standards or methods change, we will give you timely notice, the schedule will be extended for each day of delay, and we will be compensated for costs and expenses incurred in accordance with our Schedule of Charges. 5.8 If you fail to pay us in accordance with this Agreement, we may consider the default a total breach of this Agreement and, at our option, terminate our duties without liability to you or to others, and you will compensate us for fees earned and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 5.9 In consideration of our providing insurance to cover claims made by you, you hereby waive any right to offset fees otherwise due us. Section 6: Disputes, Damage, and Risk Allocation 6.1 Each of us will exercise good faith efforts to resolve disputes without litigation. Such efforts will include, but not be limited to, a meeting(s) attended by each party’s representative(s) empowered to resolve the dispute. Before either of us commences an action against the other, disputes (except collections) will be submitted to mediation. 6.2 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, neither party hereto shall be responsible or held liable to the other for punitive, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, or liability for loss of use, loss of business opportunity, loss of profit or revenue, loss of product or output, or business interruption. 6.3 You and we agree that any action in relation to an alleged breach of our standard of care or this Agreement shall be commenced within one year of the date of the breach or of the date of substantial completion of Services, whichever is earlier, without regard to the date the breach is discovered. Any action not brought within that one year time period shall be barred, without regard to any other limitations period set forth by law or statute. We will not be liable unless you have notified us within 30 days of the date of such breach and unless you have given us an opportunity to investigate and to recommend ways of mitigating damages. You agree not to make a claim against us unless you have provided us at least 30 days prior to the institution of any legal proceeding against us with a written certificate executed by an appropriately licensed professional specifying and certifying each and every act or omission that you contend constitutes a violation of the standard of care governing our professional services. Should you fail to meet the conditions above, you agree to fully release us from any liability for such allegation. 6.4 For you to obtain the benefit of a fee which includes a reasonable allowance for risks, you agree that our aggregate liability for all claims will not exceed the fee paid for Services or $50,000, whichever is greater. If you are unwilling to accept this allocation of risk, we will increase our aggregate liability to $100,000 provided that, within 10 days of the date of this Agreement, you provide payment in an amount that will increase our fees by 10%, but not less than $500, to compensate us for the greater risk undertaken. This increased fee is not the purchase of insurance. 6.5 You agree to indemnify us from all liability to others in excess of the risk allocation stated herein and to insure this obligation. In addition, all indemnities and limitations of liability set forth in this Agreement apply however the same may arise, whether in contract, tort, statute, equity or other theory of law, including, but not limited to, the breach of any legal duty or the fault, negligence, or strict liability of either party. 6.6 This Agreement shall be governed, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state in which our servicing office is located, without regard to its conflict of laws rules. The laws of the state of our servicing office will govern all disputes, and all claims shall be heard in the state or federal courts for that state. Each of us waives trial by jury. 6.7 No officer or employee acting within the scope of employment shall have individual liability for his or her acts or omissions, and you agree not to make a claim against individual officers or employees. Section 7: General Indemnification 7.1 We will indemnify and hold you harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by our negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom we are legally responsible. You will indemnify and hold us harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by your negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom you are legally responsible. 7.2 To the extent it may be necessary to indemnify either of us under Section 7.1, you and we expressly waive, in favor of the other only, any immunity or exemption from liability that exists under any worker compensation law. Section 8: Miscellaneous Provisions 8.1 We will provide a certificate of insurance to you upon request. Any claim as an Additional Insured shall be limited to losses caused by our negligence. 8.2 You and we, for ourselves and our insurers, waive all claims and rights of subrogation for losses arising out of causes of loss covered by our respective insurance policies. 8.3 Neither of us will assign or transfer any interest, any claim, any cause of action, or any right against the other. Neither of us will assign or otherwise transfer or encumber any proceeds or expected proceeds or compensation from the project or project claims to any third person, whether directly or as collateral or otherwise. 8.4 This Agreement may be terminated early only in writing. You will compensate us for fees earned for performance completed and expenses incurred up to the time of termination. 8.5 If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, then such provision will be modified to reflect the parties' intention. All remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 8.6 No waiver of any right or privilege of either party will occur upon such party's failure to insist on performance of any term, condition, or instruction, or failure to exercise any right or privilege or its waiver of any breach. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Approve Radio Replacements for Utility Billing System Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.6. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  PROPOSED MOTION The city council approves the attached settlement agreement with Ferguson Waterworks and Neptune for replacement of Utility Radios. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND In 2012 the City Council approved the purchase of an automated Utility Billing Radio reading system.  The City of Chanhassen purchased a Neptune system from Ferguson Waterworks, following the lead of two other cities (Maple Grove & Roseville) purchasing the identical system. Within the first couple of years it became apparent the radios installed in each of the homes in each of the communities had a high­failure rate.  Over the past several years all three cities have been working with Neptune and Ferguson to come up with a solution where any failures of radios would be at a minimum. The other two cities have already reached an agreement with the providers and within the last couple of weeks City staff along with management from Ferguson have come upon an agreement for replacement of the radios. If the City just exchanges the R450’s with R900 Radios (What Maple Grove & Roseville Agreed to) City Utility Department staff would slowly replace the R450 Radios as they fail over the next 6­8 years with R900 Radios.  There would be no cost for the exchange, but the newly installed R900 radios would take over whatever remaining portion of the R450 radio warranty had left.  Since the majority of the R450 radios are already 7­8 years old, there would only be just over 10 years remaining of warranty on the new R900 radios.  That remaining portion of warranty in the last 10 years is also prorated and if the newly installed R900 radios were to fail in that time frame there would be at least a small portion of additional cost to replace those radios. In addition, the City still would need to replace the remaining 5,500 (2,000 already replaced) of residential meters over the next 10 years as these remaining meters will have reached their useful lives.  The current cost for just the meter is $145/meter and pricing of the meter is subject to change every year going forward with inflationary pressures. IMPACTS: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectApprove Radio Replacements for Utility Billing SystemSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.6.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: PROPOSED MOTIONThe city council approves the attached settlement agreement with Ferguson Waterworks and Neptune forreplacement of Utility Radios.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDIn 2012 the City Council approved the purchase of an automated Utility Billing Radio reading system.  The City ofChanhassen purchased a Neptune system from Ferguson Waterworks, following the lead of two other cities (MapleGrove & Roseville) purchasing the identical system.Within the first couple of years it became apparent the radios installed in each of the homes in each of the communitieshad a high­failure rate.  Over the past several years all three cities have been working with Neptune and Ferguson tocome up with a solution where any failures of radios would be at a minimum.The other two cities have already reached an agreement with the providers and within the last couple of weeks Citystaff along with management from Ferguson have come upon an agreement for replacement of the radios.If the City just exchanges the R450’s with R900 Radios (What Maple Grove & Roseville Agreed to)City Utility Department staff would slowly replace the R450 Radios as they fail over the next 6­8 years with R900Radios.  There would be no cost for the exchange, but the newly installed R900 radios would take over whateverremaining portion of the R450 radio warranty had left.  Since the majority of the R450 radios are already 7­8 yearsold, there would only be just over 10 years remaining of warranty on the new R900 radios.  That remaining portion ofwarranty in the last 10 years is also prorated and if the newly installed R900 radios were to fail in that time frame therewould be at least a small portion of additional cost to replace those radios.In addition, the City still would need to replace the remaining 5,500 (2,000 already replaced) of residential metersover the next 10 years as these remaining meters will have reached their useful lives.  The current cost for just themeter is $145/meter and pricing of the meter is subject to change every year going forward with inflationary pressures. IMPACTS: RADIOS ­ The new R900 radios will be warrantied for a maximum of 12 years rather than 20 years (original radios were installed in 2012 so 8 years of warranty has already expired).  A significant amount of the Radios will be warrantied for much less than 12 years as it will take 6­8 years to replace all of the R450 radios. METERS ­The current price difference in meters based on the negotiated contract in scenario #2 below is $28 ($145 for current meter under scenario #1 above and $117 for new bundled package of meter and radio in scenario #2 below).  The contracted price below is also capped at $117/meter and radio for 3 years, and set at a CPI index for price increases after 3 years.  The minimum additional cost over the next 10 years to replace the remaining meters as compared to scenario #2 below would be $154,000. If the City agrees to the contractual bundled price for Meter and Radio at $117 City Utility Department staff would slowly replace R450 Radios as they fail over the next 6­8 years with R900 Radios.  At the same time the Radio is being replaced staff would replace meters that haven’t already been replaced.  The bundled price for the meter and radio would be $117 for the first three years and beyond three years increased by no greater than a CPI index.  The bundled price package in this scenario also includes a full 20­year warranty on the newly installed R900 radios. IMPACTS: RADIOS ­ The new R900 radios will be warrantied for a full twenty years. METERS –The remaining 5,500 residential meters that will need replacing over the next 10 years will be replaced at a cost savings of at least $28/meter (and most likely will be more than $28 in savings as this package price is capped at $117 for the first three years) than under scenario #1 above. All other variables including collectors and software costs:  All other costs for software, collectors and optional pricing items are the same under either scenario.  The contract also includes an optional R900 radio­only purchase price with a full warranty of $45.  That price is significantly reduced as compared to current market price for the same radio and warranty. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the execution of Scenario #2 above and approval of the attached settlement agreement. ATTACHMENTS: UB Radio Settlement Agreement CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020­XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03: Accept Feasibility Study; Call Public Hearing Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.7. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­03 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03 and calls for a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) for consultant services for the project.  On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professional services for the Lake Lucy Road project. On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project. On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with the public. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project. DISCUSSION Lake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41 (Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavement rehabilitation.  The city's five­year Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in 2020.  Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shown in Figure 1.  The project includes a 0.66­mile long urbanized street corridor.  The existing road section was originally constructed between 1994 and 1998. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03: Accept FeasibilityStudy; Call Public HearingSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.7.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­03PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03 and callsfor a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Lake Lucy Road project.On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study for the project.On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with thepublic. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.DISCUSSIONLake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41(Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavementrehabilitation.  The city's five­year Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in2020.  Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits asshown in Figure 1.  The project includes a 0.66­mile long urbanized street corridor.  The existing road section was originally constructed between 1994 and 1998. Figure 1: Project Area Map Lake Lucy Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route.  The city will utilize State Aid funding and special assessments to finance the street improvements.  City utility funds will be used for funding any of the necessary utility improvements. The average pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63, which is within the range where overlays should be considered.  The western half of the section is a few years older and the associated OCI is lower than the eastern half.  An RFP for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineering department.  American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare a geotechnical report for the project area.  The report confirmed there is a pavement performance change about 350 feet east of Brendan Court.  This confirms the different OCI ratings through the project area.  The reports attribute the differing pavement distresses observed between the western and eastern sections due to weaker supporting soils in the western half. The feasibility study in conjunction with the geotechnical report evaluated several different alternatives for pavement rehabilitation and recommended an alternative­type of a mill and overlay.  A standard 2.5­inch mill and overlay is recommended to be combined with a seal coat between the milled surface and new bituminous layer.  This rehabilitation combination technique is known as a 'Texas Underseal'.  The additional seal coat layer is intended to delay reflective cracking between the existing base layer and the new overlay.  Two or three additional years of service life are expected to be gained by adding this technique to a standard mill and overlay.  The weaker support soils in the western half will not be able to be fully corrected until a reconstruction project is performed.  The 'Texas Underseal' is effectively intended to buy additional time for the service life of the pavement section.  The trail along the corridor is intended to be rehabilitated via a full depth reclamation. Some spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are also part of the project.  All pedestrian ramps will be brought into ADA compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan. A capacity analysis of the storm sewer system was performed to verify it was adequately designed to serve the area.  The analysis verified the existing system meets current design standards and the updated NOAA Atlas­14 rainfall model standard.  A spread and run analysis was also performed for each catch basin to identify any ponding concerns on the roadway.  The analysis identified three catch basin locations where an additional catch basin should be added to reduce temporary ponding during an intense rainfall event. Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer is not necessary.  The valves on the watermain are planned to be rehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves.  The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likely to be mild steel.  The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils found in Chanhassen.  Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitary sewer system. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03: Accept FeasibilityStudy; Call Public HearingSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.7.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­03PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03 and callsfor a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Lake Lucy Road project.On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study for the project.On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with thepublic. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.DISCUSSIONLake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41(Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavementrehabilitation.  The city's five­year Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in2020.  Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits asshown in Figure 1.  The project includes a 0.66­mile long urbanized street corridor.  The existing road section wasoriginally constructed between 1994 and 1998.Figure 1: Project Area MapLake Lucy Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route.  The city will utilize State Aid funding andspecial assessments to finance the street improvements.  City utility funds will be used for funding any of the necessaryutility improvements.The average pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63, which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered.  The western half of the section is a few years older and the associated OCI is lower than the easternhalf. An RFP for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineeringdepartment.  American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare a geotechnical report forthe project area.  The report confirmed there is a pavement performance change about 350 feet east of BrendanCourt.  This confirms the different OCI ratings through the project area.  The reports attribute the differing pavementdistresses observed between the western and eastern sections due to weaker supporting soils in the western half.The feasibility study in conjunction with the geotechnical report evaluated several different alternatives for pavementrehabilitation and recommended an alternative­type of a mill and overlay.  A standard 2.5­inch mill and overlay isrecommended to be combined with a seal coat between the milled surface and new bituminous layer.  Thisrehabilitation combination technique is known as a 'Texas Underseal'.  The additional seal coat layer is intended todelay reflective cracking between the existing base layer and the new overlay.  Two or three additional years of servicelife are expected to be gained by adding this technique to a standard mill and overlay.  The weaker support soils in thewestern half will not be able to be fully corrected until a reconstruction project is performed.  The 'Texas Underseal' iseffectively intended to buy additional time for the service life of the pavement section.  The trail along the corridor isintended to be rehabilitated via a full depth reclamation.Some spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are also part of the project.  All pedestrian ramps will bebrought into ADA compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.A capacity analysis of the storm sewer system was performed to verify it was adequately designed to serve the area. The analysis verified the existing system meets current design standards and the updated NOAA Atlas­14 rainfallmodel standard.  A spread and run analysis was also performed for each catch basin to identify any ponding concernson the roadway.  The analysis identified three catch basin locations where an additional catch basin should be added toreduce temporary ponding during an intense rainfall event.Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer is not necessary.  The valves on the watermain are planned to berehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves.  The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likelyto be mild steel.  The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils found in Chanhassen.  Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitary sewer system. An open house informational meeting for public involvement was held on January 28, 2020.  As appropriate, comments received were factored into the preliminary design and are included in the feasibility report.  Speeding along the corridor was the primary common concern.  Staff commissioned a speed study to be performed along the corridor to analyze the concern.  The study was conducted over a 7­day period in February.  The actual speed was not displayed on the sign apparatus to the traveling public during the study in order to record typical traveled speeds along the corridor without inducing a natural slowing at the device.  From an engineering perspective, the 85th percentile is used to determine if there is a speeding concern.  The 85th percentile speed was at the 30­mph speed limit with an average pace between 23 mph and 33 mph. The proposed improvements will also address current NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District requirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff related to construction activities. Funding The project is intended to be funded from State Aid funds, special assessments, and City utility funds.   The estimated project costs* are as follows: * The estimated project costs include a 5% contingency and 10% indirect cost. The project is proposed to be assessed to the adjacent benefiting properties per the City's Assessment Practice.  Lake Lucy Road is a collector roadway.  As such, the assessable street rehabilitation costs have been prorated to reflect a standard residential street width of 31 feet.  The assessable costs have also been prorated to reflect the assessable front footage of the benefiting properties along Lake Lucy Road through the project area.  The front footage of benefiting properties is 48%. The assessment cost summary including the preliminary assessment amount is as follows: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03: Accept FeasibilityStudy; Call Public HearingSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.7.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­03PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03 and callsfor a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Lake Lucy Road project.On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study for the project.On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with thepublic. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.DISCUSSIONLake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41(Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavementrehabilitation.  The city's five­year Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in2020.  Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits asshown in Figure 1.  The project includes a 0.66­mile long urbanized street corridor.  The existing road section wasoriginally constructed between 1994 and 1998.Figure 1: Project Area MapLake Lucy Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route.  The city will utilize State Aid funding andspecial assessments to finance the street improvements.  City utility funds will be used for funding any of the necessaryutility improvements.The average pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63, which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered.  The western half of the section is a few years older and the associated OCI is lower than the easternhalf. An RFP for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineeringdepartment.  American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare a geotechnical report forthe project area.  The report confirmed there is a pavement performance change about 350 feet east of BrendanCourt.  This confirms the different OCI ratings through the project area.  The reports attribute the differing pavementdistresses observed between the western and eastern sections due to weaker supporting soils in the western half.The feasibility study in conjunction with the geotechnical report evaluated several different alternatives for pavementrehabilitation and recommended an alternative­type of a mill and overlay.  A standard 2.5­inch mill and overlay isrecommended to be combined with a seal coat between the milled surface and new bituminous layer.  Thisrehabilitation combination technique is known as a 'Texas Underseal'.  The additional seal coat layer is intended todelay reflective cracking between the existing base layer and the new overlay.  Two or three additional years of servicelife are expected to be gained by adding this technique to a standard mill and overlay.  The weaker support soils in thewestern half will not be able to be fully corrected until a reconstruction project is performed.  The 'Texas Underseal' iseffectively intended to buy additional time for the service life of the pavement section.  The trail along the corridor isintended to be rehabilitated via a full depth reclamation.Some spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are also part of the project.  All pedestrian ramps will bebrought into ADA compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.A capacity analysis of the storm sewer system was performed to verify it was adequately designed to serve the area. The analysis verified the existing system meets current design standards and the updated NOAA Atlas­14 rainfallmodel standard.  A spread and run analysis was also performed for each catch basin to identify any ponding concernson the roadway.  The analysis identified three catch basin locations where an additional catch basin should be added toreduce temporary ponding during an intense rainfall event.Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer is not necessary.  The valves on the watermain are planned to berehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves.  The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likelyto be mild steel.  The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils foundin Chanhassen.  Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitarysewer system.An open house informational meeting for public involvement was held on January 28, 2020.  As appropriate,comments received were factored into the preliminary design and are included in the feasibility report.  Speeding alongthe corridor was the primary common concern.  Staff commissioned a speed study to be performed along the corridorto analyze the concern.  The study was conducted over a 7­day period in February.  The actual speed was notdisplayed on the sign apparatus to the traveling public during the study in order to record typical traveled speeds alongthe corridor without inducing a natural slowing at the device.  From an engineering perspective, the 85th percentile isused to determine if there is a speeding concern.  The 85th percentile speed was at the 30­mph speed limit with anaverage pace between 23 mph and 33 mph.The proposed improvements will also address current NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed Districtrequirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff related toconstruction activities.FundingThe project is intended to be funded from State Aid funds, special assessments, and City utility funds.  The estimated project costs* are as follows:* The estimated project costs include a 5% contingency and 10% indirect cost.The project is proposed to be assessed to the adjacent benefiting properties per the City's Assessment Practice.  LakeLucy Road is a collector roadway.  As such, the assessable street rehabilitation costs have been prorated to reflect astandard residential street width of 31 feet.  The assessable costs have also been prorated to reflect the assessablefront footage of the benefiting properties along Lake Lucy Road through the project area.  The front footage ofbenefiting properties is 48%. The assessment cost summary including the preliminary assessment amount is as follows: Schedule RECOMMENDATION From an engineering and financing perspective this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective. Staff recommends the feasibility report be accepted. Staff also recommends a Public Hearing be authorized and scheduled on April 27, 2020. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03: Accept FeasibilityStudy; Call Public HearingSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.7.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­03PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project No. 20­03 and callsfor a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 7, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On November 22, 2019, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Lake Lucy Road project.On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with WSB & Associates and authorizedpreparation of a feasibility study for the project.On January 28, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with thepublic. Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.DISCUSSIONLake Lucy Road is a collector street located on the east side of Lake Minnewashta between State Highway 41(Hazeltine Boulevard) and County Road 117 (Galpin Boulevard) and is in need of roadway pavementrehabilitation.  The city's five­year Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of Lake Lucy Road in2020.  Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits asshown in Figure 1.  The project includes a 0.66­mile long urbanized street corridor.  The existing road section wasoriginally constructed between 1994 and 1998.Figure 1: Project Area MapLake Lucy Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) route.  The city will utilize State Aid funding andspecial assessments to finance the street improvements.  City utility funds will be used for funding any of the necessaryutility improvements.The average pavement overall condition index (OCI) is 63, which is within the range where overlays should beconsidered.  The western half of the section is a few years older and the associated OCI is lower than the easternhalf. An RFP for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineeringdepartment.  American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare a geotechnical report forthe project area.  The report confirmed there is a pavement performance change about 350 feet east of BrendanCourt.  This confirms the different OCI ratings through the project area.  The reports attribute the differing pavementdistresses observed between the western and eastern sections due to weaker supporting soils in the western half.The feasibility study in conjunction with the geotechnical report evaluated several different alternatives for pavementrehabilitation and recommended an alternative­type of a mill and overlay.  A standard 2.5­inch mill and overlay isrecommended to be combined with a seal coat between the milled surface and new bituminous layer.  Thisrehabilitation combination technique is known as a 'Texas Underseal'.  The additional seal coat layer is intended todelay reflective cracking between the existing base layer and the new overlay.  Two or three additional years of servicelife are expected to be gained by adding this technique to a standard mill and overlay.  The weaker support soils in thewestern half will not be able to be fully corrected until a reconstruction project is performed.  The 'Texas Underseal' iseffectively intended to buy additional time for the service life of the pavement section.  The trail along the corridor isintended to be rehabilitated via a full depth reclamation.Some spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are also part of the project.  All pedestrian ramps will bebrought into ADA compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.A capacity analysis of the storm sewer system was performed to verify it was adequately designed to serve the area. The analysis verified the existing system meets current design standards and the updated NOAA Atlas­14 rainfallmodel standard.  A spread and run analysis was also performed for each catch basin to identify any ponding concernson the roadway.  The analysis identified three catch basin locations where an additional catch basin should be added toreduce temporary ponding during an intense rainfall event.Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer is not necessary.  The valves on the watermain are planned to berehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves.  The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likelyto be mild steel.  The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils foundin Chanhassen.  Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitarysewer system.An open house informational meeting for public involvement was held on January 28, 2020.  As appropriate,comments received were factored into the preliminary design and are included in the feasibility report.  Speeding alongthe corridor was the primary common concern.  Staff commissioned a speed study to be performed along the corridorto analyze the concern.  The study was conducted over a 7­day period in February.  The actual speed was notdisplayed on the sign apparatus to the traveling public during the study in order to record typical traveled speeds alongthe corridor without inducing a natural slowing at the device.  From an engineering perspective, the 85th percentile isused to determine if there is a speeding concern.  The 85th percentile speed was at the 30­mph speed limit with anaverage pace between 23 mph and 33 mph.The proposed improvements will also address current NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed Districtrequirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff related toconstruction activities.FundingThe project is intended to be funded from State Aid funds, special assessments, and City utility funds.  The estimated project costs* are as follows:* The estimated project costs include a 5% contingency and 10% indirect cost.The project is proposed to be assessed to the adjacent benefiting properties per the City's Assessment Practice.  LakeLucy Road is a collector roadway.  As such, the assessable street rehabilitation costs have been prorated to reflect astandard residential street width of 31 feet.  The assessable costs have also been prorated to reflect the assessablefront footage of the benefiting properties along Lake Lucy Road through the project area.  The front footage ofbenefiting properties is 48%.The assessment cost summary including the preliminary assessment amount is as follows:ScheduleRECOMMENDATIONFrom an engineering and financing perspective this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective. Staff recommends the feasibility report be accepted. Staff also recommends a Public Hearing be authorized and scheduled on April 27, 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Feasibility Study Geotechnical Report Speed Study 5­yr CIP Map 2020 CIP Sheet Resolution FEASIBILITY REPORT CITY PROJECT NO. 20-03: LAKE LUCY ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT CITY OF CHANHASSEN | CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA APRIL 13, 2020 Prepared for: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 WSB PROJECT NO. R-015301-000 FEASIBILITY REPORT Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 CITY PROJECT NO. 20-03: LAKE LUCY ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT FOR THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA April 13, 2020 Prepared By: April 13, 2020 Mr. Charles Howley, PE Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-000 Dear Mr. Howley: Transmitted herewith for your review is a feasibility report which addresses the street improvements for the City Project No. 20-03: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project. We are available at your convenience to discuss this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 763.287.8537 if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, WSB Nicholas N. Preisler, PE Project Engineer Attachment srb 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM CERTIFICATION Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Nicholas N. Preisler, PE Date: April 13, 2020 Lic. No. 54902 Quality Control Review Completed By: Eric M. Eckman, PE Date: April 13, 2020 Lic. No. 49954 TABLE OF CONTENTS Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 1 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Authorization ........................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Scope .................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Data Available ...................................................................................................... 2 2.4 Project Location ................................................................................................... 2 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 3 3.1 Street and Sidewalk ............................................................................................. 3 3.2 Municipal Utilities ................................................................................................. 3 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................................... 4 4.1 Streets ................................................................................................................. 4 4.2 Bituminous Trail ................................................................................................... 4 4.3 Municipal Utilities ................................................................................................. 5 4.4 Permits and Approvals ......................................................................................... 6 4.5 Right-of-Way/Easements ..................................................................................... 6 4.6 Private Utilities ..................................................................................................... 6 4.7 Public Involvement ............................................................................................... 6 5. FINANCING .................................................................................................................... 7 5.1 Opinion of Probable Cost ..................................................................................... 7 5.2 Funding Sources .................................................................................................. 7 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE ................................................................................................... 8 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION ...................................................................... 9 Appendix A Figure 1: Project Location Figure 2: Underlying Soils Map Figure 3: Watermain Utility Map Figure 4: Sanitary Sewer Utility Map Figure 5: Storm Sewer Utility Map Appendix B Figure 6: Drainage Area Map Figure 7: Catch Basin Spacing Map A Figure 8: Catch Basin Spacing Map B Figure 9: Catch Basin Spacing Map C Appendix C Public Involvement Meeting TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Appendix D Opinion of Probable Cost Appendix E Figure 10: Preliminary Assessment Map Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix F Geotechnical Report, American Engineering Testing, dated 12/20/19 Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City Project No. 20-03: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project consists of roadway milling and bituminous overlay on approximately 3,500 feet (0.66 miles) of roadway, extending from Hazeltine Blvd (TH 41) to Galpin Blvd (CR 117) on Lake Lucy Road. The proposed improvements will also include full depth reclamation and bituminous paving of the adjacent trail, spot curb and gutter replacement, ADA pedestrian curb ramp improvements, minor utility repairs, and drainage improvements. Replacing portions of the City’s deteriorating utility infrastructure in conjunction with the proposed street improvements provides an opportunity to minimize the replacement costs and traffic disruptions than if repaired separately. Proposed utility improvements include the following:  Repair or replacement of deficient storm sewer and storm manholes  Replacement of all existing storm and sanitary manhole castings that do not meet current City standards  Bolting replacement on all gate valves and hydrant valves  Anode bag installation on watermain The total estimated project cost is $722,500, which includes a 5% contingency and 10% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing items. The project is proposed to be funded through special assessments to benefiting property owners, City utility funds, and State Aid funds. The project is proposed to be assessed to the adjacent benefiting properties in accordance with the City’s assessment practice, which is to assess 40% of the street improvement costs. Due to Lake Lucy Road being designated as a collector roadway, the assessments are prorated to reflect assessable front footage along Lake Lucy Road and to reflect a standard residential street width of 31 feet (back of curb to back of curb). Costs associated with the trail improvements are not assessable. The remaining percentage of the street improvement costs will be funded through State Aid funding and the full cost of the utility improvements will be funded through City utility funds. The project is proposed to be substantially completed in 2020, including restoration items. The project is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint and should be constructed as proposed herein. Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 2 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Authorization On December 9, 2019, the City of Chanhassen City Council authorized the preparation of an engineering feasibility report for the City Project No. 20-03: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project by WSB. 2.2 Scope This report investigates the feasibility of proposed improvements to streets, bituminous trail, and utilities along Lake Lucy Road which are identified within the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2020. Improvements outlined within this report include bituminous pavement milling and paving, full depth reclamation and paving of the adjacent trail, drainage and storm sewer improvements, watermain improvements, minor sanitary sewer repairs, and ADA pedestrian curb ramp improvements. The proposed improvements will also include spot repairs to curb and gutter in addition to concrete aprons. 2.3 Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following:  City of Chanhassen record drawings  City of Chanhassen GIS maps  Field observations of the area  Sanitary Sewer Televising, Pipe Services, completed in November 2018  Geotechnical Evaluation Report, American Engineering Testing, dated 12/20/19  Structure Inspection Reports, provided by City Staff in January 2020  Surveyed Information  City Wide HydroCAD Model and Drainage Area Maps dated July 2006 2.4 Project Location The project is located on Lake Lucy Road, which lies east of Lake Minnewashta between Hazeltine Blvd (TH 41) to Galpin Blvd (CR 117). The project area is identified on Figure 1 in Appendix A. Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 3 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Street and Bituminous Trail The existing Lake Lucy Road is a designated Municipal State Aid Street with a 36-foot roadway width (back of curb to back of curb) and an 80-foot right-of-way width. The existing pavement is bituminous with an 8-foot-wide bituminous trail along the north side of the road, B618 concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer with drain tile at the low-points to drain the roadbed. Record plans indicate Lake Lucy Road was constructed in multiple segments between 1994 and 1998. The pavement surface within the proposed improvement area is aging and exhibiting inconsistent longitudinal and transverse cracking. These types of distresses are too advanced to be addressed with patching and/or chip sealing. The Geotechnical Report identified two significantly different types of underlying soils underneath Lake Lucy Road, which may have contributed to the different pavement distresses along the roadway. A map of the underlying soils can be found on Figure 2 in Appendix A. The underlying soils of the western segment were found to be weaker and have an estimated design R- value of 12, while the underlying soils on the eastern segment were found to be stronger with an estimated design R-value of 30. Record drawings indicate the pavement section of the western section consists of 6.5” of bituminous pavement and 18” of aggregate base. The eastern section is shown to consist of 3.5” of bituminous pavement and 12” of aggregate base. The difference in R-value and pavement sections may have been the reason for inconsistent pavement distresses along the roadway. Outside of the roadway, the curb and gutter and driveway aprons are in good condition; however, some cracking and localized settlements have occurred. The bituminous trail adjacent to Lake Lucy Road shows signs of pavement distress on the surface and the pavement cores obtained from the trail exhibited stripping which occurs when the asphalt loses bond with the aggregate material underneath. Additionally, two of the five pavement cores taken from the trail shows the base underneath the pavement is thinner than what is shown on the record plans. 3.2 Municipal Utilities The existing watermain system consists of a 12-inch DIP within Lake Lucy Road. The watermain was installed at the time the roadway segments were initially constructed and is functioning adequately. However, based on the history of watermain within the City, the practice has been to make some minor improvements to these watermains in conjunction with street rehabilitation projects to reduce the potential for disruptive and costly watermain breaks in the future. A map of the existing watermain system can be found on Figure 3 in Appendix A. The existing sanitary sewer system consists of 8-inch and 10-inch PVC pipe within the project area. The existing sanitary sewer was televised in 2018, and the mainline sewer was found to be in good condition with isolated mineral deposits and limited minor sags. The sanitary sewer services to adjacent properties were not televised with the mainline televising; however, residents were notified that a request could be made to have the City Utility Department televise the sanitary service including the private portion between the right-of-way and the home. In addition to the municipal sanitary sewer system, there is a large diameter sanitary forcemain operated by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) along Lake Lucy Road. A map of the existing sanitary sewer system can be found on Figure 4 in Appendix A. The existing storm sewer infrastructure within the project area mainly consists of reinforced concrete pipe that was installed at the same time the roadway segments were initially constructed. The system collects storm water runoff from the roadway and adjacent storm sewer systems, which outlet to various downstream ponds in the area. The City has indicated that there are no known flooding issues in the project area. A capacity analysis of the storm sewer was conducted by WSB as a part of this report to ensure there is adequate flow capacity in the system. The adjacent ponds next to the project site upstream and downstream were also reviewed by WSB. A map of the existing storm sewer system can be found on Figure 5 in Appendix A. Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 4 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 Streets The pavement section along Lake Lucy Road shows signs of pavement distress and needs repair to extend the useful life of the roadway. The improvement options explored included: full reconstruction, pavement reclamation, and mill and overlay. The full reconstruction and pavement reclamation approaches are typically performed when the pavement is at the end of its serviceable life and has deteriorated to such a condition that lower cost rehabilitation methods are not effective. Based on the existing pavement distresses observed along Lake Lucy Road we believe the existing pavement is not at the end of its serviceable life and can be effectively rehabilitated. Other considerations including previous repair history, roadway age, traffic volumes, and future roadway classification, were factors in determining the most cost-effective method to extend the life of the roadway. Based on the considerations stated above, a full-width 2.5-inch mill and bituminous overlay with a Texas Underseal is recommended. The resulting pavement section will meet MnDOT State Aid design standards for structural design strength. Texas Underseal is a chip seal coat applied to the milled surface prior to overlaying the new pavement. They help a conventional mill and overlay to perform better as it delays non-thermal cracks from reflecting through the bituminous overlay. A typical mill and bituminous overlay will extend a pavement’s life another eight to ten years. When Texas Underseals are applied to milled pavement prior to the bituminous overlay, it can add two to three additional years compared to a standard mill and overlay. As an alternative to the mill and overlay improvements, full depth reclamation could be performed to provide a more long-term improvement. According to the MnDOT Pavement Design manual, full depth reclamation could extend the useful life of the roadway by 20 years or more when proper maintenance is performed. This alternative is being presented for consideration against budgetary constraints and the City’s pavement improvement goals. The costs to perform the full depth reclamation are shown in the Opinion of Probable Cost as “Bid Alternate No. 1”. These were not factored into the assessments included later in this report. In addition to the street improvements, new ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps are proposed to be installed at all crosswalk locations within the project area. Based on visual field inspection by City Staff, approximately 10% of the concrete curb and gutter within the project area is deficient and is recommended for replacement. Additional curb and gutter will be impacted by catch basin improvements, hydrant replacements, and ADA improvements. 4.2 Bituminous Trail The Geotechnical Report considered two rehabilitation options for the bituminous trail; reconstruction and 1.5-inch bituminous overlay. Reconstruction of the bituminous trail would come at a significant cost while the overlay approach would only temporarily remove the existing pavement distresses, and we would expect cracks and other deformities to reappear after only a short time. Another option to rehabilitate the trail is with full depth reclamation. To account for the thin aggregate base section shown in the pavement cores, additional aggregate material would be added to the top of the trail in specific areas prior to reclamation to provide a suitable foundation for the trail. A cost comparison of the three options are shown in Table 3 below: Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 5 Table 3 - Bituminous Trail Alternatives Rehabilitation Method Total Cost Reconstruction $88,550 1.5" Overlay $38,150 Full Depth Reclamation $65,150 Based on the considerations stated above, a full depth reclamation of the bituminous trail is recommended. 4.3 Municipal Utilities The existing 12-inch DIP watermain in Lake Lucy Road is functioning adequately and has no known breaks within the project area. Additionally, there are no documented issues with gate valves and there is only one deficient hydrant (ID: 10-034) within the project area. However, due to the age of the watermain, there is a high probability that the bolting on the gate valves consist of mild steel. Current City standards require stainless steel bolts due to the highly corrosive soils in the area. Proposed improvements to the watermain include replacement of all gate valve and hydrant valve bolts. Additionally, sacrificial anode bags provided by the City will be installed by the contractor. Anode bags have been shown to extend the service life of the utility by overcoming the external corrosion caused by the soil. The sanitary sewer system was televised and inspected by City staff and minor repairs are recommended. The proposed minor repairs to the system include removal of mineral deposits at joints, replacement of concrete adjustment rings, installation of chimney seals to reduce inflow and infiltration, and replacement of casting lids that do not conform to the City’s standards. City staff inspections revealed limited need for manhole repair and replacement. The sanitary sewer services to adjacent properties were not televised with the main line, and therefore recommendations for repair or replacement are not included in this report. However, residents were notified that a request could be made to have the City Utility Department televise their private sanitary service. The storm sewer system was inspected by City staff and minor repairs are recommended. The proposed minor repairs to the system include replacement of structures identified to be in poor condition, replacement of deficient draintile, replacement of deficient concrete adjustment rings, and invert and doghouse repairs. WSB performed a capacity analysis of the existing storm sewer and that analysis determined that all storm sewer within the project limits was adequately sized for the 10-yr design storm event. A spread and run analysis was completed along Lake Lucy Road. This analysis found that three catch basins would need to be added at various low points in order to meet current state aid requirements, as shown on Figures 6-9 in Appendix B. The City-wide HydroCAD model dated July 2006 was modified to refine drainage area boundaries and update the model to use Atlas-14 rainfall depths with MSE 3 rainfall distribution. The updated HydroCAD model was used to identify trunk storm sewer capacity within the project corridor and to evaluate adjacent ponding areas. The model results show that the trunk storm sewer is not undersized and adjacent ponds maintain at least 1 ft of freeboard from all low points on Lake Lucy Rd during the 100-year 24-hr rainfall event. Six ponds were analyzed with the existing conditions from the Storm Water Asset Management Program (SWAMP). Two of the ponds in their existing conditions were shown to be due for maintenance, as seen from the SWAMP scores of 25-50 in Figure 6 of Appendix B. Runoff rates and volumes from the project area will not be changed from pre-project conditions because the project does not propose an increase in impervious surface. No impacts to wetlands will be made with this project. The existing cross slopes of the streets will also be evaluated during the design phase of the project. Any area without an adequate crown will be identified, and a 2% crown will be established with paving operations to shed water off the driving surface. Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 6 4.4 Permits and Approvals Based on the nature of the construction and overall size of the project, the following permits have been identified and will be prepared and submitted on behalf of the City: · Minnesota Pollution Control Agency – NPDES Construction Activity Permit · RPBC Watershed District – Erosion and Sediment Control · MnDOT – Miscellaneous Work in Right-of-way (Hazeltine Blvd) · Carver County – Right-of-way Permit (Galpin Blvd) 4.5 Right-of-Way/Easements The surface and utility improvements proposed will be contained within the existing right-of-way. It is not anticipated that additional easements or rights-of-way will be required for these improvements. 4.6 Private Utilities A Gopher State One Call has been completed to identify the private utilities that are near or adjacent to the project area. Staff will meet with these utility companies regarding this project to discuss any impact of the proposed improvements. 4.7 Public Involvement A public informational meeting for the proposed improvements was held on January 28, 2020. Preliminary information was presented to attendees regarding the proposed improvements, costs, funding, schedule, and impacts associated with the project. Comment cards were available to attendees at the meeting and are included in Appendix C. A total of 8 individuals from 8 different properties within the project area attended the public informational meeting. Follow-up meetings will be held with individual property owners during the design process as necessary. The primary feedback received during the meeting was regarding traffic speeds along the Lake Lucy Road corridor. City staff subsequently performed a speed study along the corridor and found the posted speed limit of 30 MPH to be appropriate for the vehicle speeds observed during the study. Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 7 5. FINANCING 5.1 Opinion of Probable Cost The Opinion of Probable Cost for the project is included in Appendix D. The opinions of cost incorporate estimated 2020 construction costs and include a 5% contingency factor and 10% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing items. Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Estimated Cost Summary Surface Improvements $528,200 Watermain Improvements $91,900 Sanitary Sewer Improvements $47,800 Storm Sewer Improvements $54,600 Total Project Cost $722,500 5.2 Funding Sources Funding for the City Project No. 20-03: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project will come from City funds, State Aid funds, and Special Assessments. The project is proposed to be assessed to the adjacent benefiting properties in accordance with the City’s assessment practice, which is to assess 40% of the street improvement costs based on residential units. The assessable costs are prorated to reflect assessable front footage along Lake Lucy Road and to reflect a standard residential street width of 31 feet (back of curb to back of curb). Costs associated with the trail and utility improvements are not included in the assessment. The table below provides a summary of the unit assessment rate calculation. The remaining percentage of the street improvement costs will be funded through State Aid funds and City funds, and 100% of the utility improvements are proposed to be funded through City Funds. The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix E along with an assessment map identifying the benefiting properties. The proposed Special Assessments are as follows: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Assessment Summary Assessable Street Cost $421,000 40% of Assessable Street Cost $168,400 Prorated Assessable Front Footage (48.15%) $81,000 Prorated for Standard Residential Street Width (86.11%) $69,800 Residential Units 20 Per Unit Assessment Rate $3,490 Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 8 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule for this improvement project is as follows for construction to occur in 2020: Public Informational Meeting ........................................................................................ January 28, 2020 City Council Accepts Feasibility Report and Orders Public Hearing .................................................................................................. April 13, 2020 Public Hearing/Council Authorizes Preparation of Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................................ April 27, 2020 State Aid Submittal ................................................................................................................... April 2020 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Ad for Bid ............................................................................................ May 11, 2020 Open Bids ............................................................................................................................ June 3, 2020 Public Informational Meeting ................................................................................................... June 2020 Assessment Hearing/Accept Bids/Award Contract ............................................................. July 13, 2020 Begin Construction .................................................................................................................... July 2020 Substantial Completion .................................................................................................. September 2020 Final Completion (Final Lift of Bituminous Wear Course) .................................................. October 2020 Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 Page 9 7. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION The City Project No. 20-03: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project includes street pavement mill and overlay improvements with spot curb and gutter replacement, bituminous trail rehabilitation, watermain improvements, minor utility improvements, and ADA improvements along Lake Lucy Road. The total estimated cost for the project is $722,500. Proposed funding for the project is provided through a combination of special assessments, City funds, and State Aid funds. Based on the information contained in this report, it is the recommendation of WSB to proceed with the City Project No. 20-03: Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project. This project is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint. The project feasibility is subject to financial review by the City of Chanhassen. Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 APPENDIX A Figure 1: Project Location Figure 2: Underlying Soils Map Figure 3: Watermain Utility Map Figure 4: Sanitary Sewer Utility Map Figure 5: Storm Sewer Utility Map ?ÌA@ Lake Lucy RdGalpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdManchester RdLake Harrison RdHighover DrPinehurst Dr Crestview Dr Br e n d e n C t Topaz Dr Highover Tr H e m l o c k L a Ruby LaCrestview Cir Highgate Cir Briarwood CtAmberwood LaM-588 Ald e r W a y Ed g e w o o d C t 1 inch = 400 feet Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\Figure1_ProjectLocation.mxd Date Saved: 3/2/2020 8:16:10 AMLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Chanhassen, MN Project Location Figure 1 - Project Location Map 0 400 Feet¯ ?ÌA@ Lake Lucy RdGalpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdManchester RdLake Harrison RdHighover DrPinehurst Dr Crestview Dr Br e n d e n C t Topaz Dr Highover Tr H e m l o c k L a Ruby LaCrestview Cir Highgate Cir Briarwood CtAmberwood LaM-588 Ald e r W a y Ed g e w o o d C t 1 inch = 400 feet Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\Figure2_SoilsMap.mxd Date Saved: 3/3/2020 2:10:02 PMLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Chanhassen, MN R Value = 30 R Value = 12 Figure 2 - Underlying Soils Map 0 400 Feet¯ !( !( !( !( !( !(!<!(!<!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!<!( !(!<!<!( !( !( !(!<!( !( !(!<!<!(!( !( !(!<!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!<!<!<!<!<!<!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!<!<!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!<!<!( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( ")") ") ") ")")") ")")!<!(!<!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( ") G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 G!5 ?ÌA@ Well House No. 7Lake Lucy RdGalpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdManchester RdLake Harrison RdHighover DrPinehurst Dr Crestview Dr Br e n d e n C t Topaz Dr Highover Tr H e m l o c k L a Ruby LaCrestview Cir Highgate Cir Briarwood CtAmberwood LaM-588 Ald e r W a y Ed g e w o o d C t 1 inch = 400 feet Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\Figure3_WatermainMap.mxd Date Saved: 4/6/2020 8:10:51 AMLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Chanhassen, MN Project Location Water Mains G!5 Hydrant !<Butterfly ")Curb Box !(Gate !(Hydrant Valve !<Plug Figure 3 - Watermain Utility Map 0 400 Feet¯ """""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( ?ÌA@ Lake Lucy RdGalpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdManchester RdLake Harrison RdHighover DrPinehurst Dr Crestview Dr Br e n d e n C t Topaz Dr Highover Tr H e m l o c k L a Ruby LaCrestview Cir Highgate Cir Briarwood CtAmberwood LaM-588 Ald e r W a y Ed g e w o o d C t 1 inch = 400 feet Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\Figure4_SanitaryMap.mxd Date Saved: 3/3/2020 2:03:21 PMLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Chanhassen, MN Project Location Met Council Interceptor Sewer Gravity Mains !(Sewer Manholes Figure 4 - Sanitary Sewer Utility Map 0 400 Feet¯ """"" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " """"""""""""""""""""""!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#* #*#* #* #*#*#* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#* #*#*#*#* #* #* #*#*#* #*#* #*#* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#*#*#*#*#* #*#*#* #*#* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #*#* #* #*#* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #*#* #* #*#* #*#* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #*#* #* ?ÌA@ Lake Lucy RdGalpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdManchester RdLake Harrison RdHighover DrPinehurst Dr Crestview Dr Br e n d e n C t Topaz Dr Highover Tr H e m l o c k L a Ruby LaCrestview Cir Highgate Cir Briarwood CtAmberwood LaM-588 Ald e r W a y Ed g e w o o d C t 1 inch = 400 feet Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\Figure5_StormMap.mxd Date Saved: 3/3/2020 2:05:39 PMLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Chanhassen, MN Project Location Storm Gravity Mains #*Storm Inlets !(Storm Manholes #*Storm Discharge Points Figure 5 - Storm Sewer Utility Map 0 400 Feet¯ Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 APPENDIX B Figure 6: Drainage Area Map Figure 7: Catch Basin Spacing A Figure 8: Catch Basin Spacing B Figure 9: Catch Basin Spacing C Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\LakeLucyRd\11x17_landscapeborder1 Date Saved: 2/13/2020 8:00 PM1 inch = 400 feet 0 400 Feet Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation City of Chanhassen Figure 6 - Overall Subdrainage Areas #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#* #* #* #* !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")") ") ") ") ")") ")") ")") ") ")") ") ")") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ")")")") ") ") ")")") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ")") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ")") ")") ") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")")") ") ")")") ")") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ")") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ")")") ")")") ") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ")") ") ") ") ")")") ")") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ") ")")")") ")") ") ")") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ")") ")") ") ")"""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " """""""""""""""""""""" """""!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")") ") ") ") ")") ")") ") ")") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ")")")") ") ") ")")") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ")") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ")") ") ")") ")") ") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")")") ") ")")") ")") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ")") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ")")") ")")") ") ") ")") ")") ") ") ") ") ")")") ")") ")") ")")") ") ") ") ") ")")") ")") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ")") ") ")") ") ")") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")")") ")") ") ")") ")") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ")") ") ")") ")") ") ") ")")") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ")")") ")") ")")")HighoverCtSTopaz Dr Ches MarFarm RdR u b y L a WoodDuck La Galpin BlvdDiamondCtMelody HillCirWhit e D o v e C i r ManchesterRdPiper Ridge La Topaz DrEdgewood C t PinehurstDrAlderWay RingneckDrL a k e L u c y R d LucyLaWhi t e D o v e D r Lake L u cyCt Portridge Cir CrestviewD rHighgate Cir Briarwood CtLakeHarri s o nCirHighoverDr Crestview Cir EmeraldLaAmberwoodLa Hi g h o v e rW a y Highover CtNHemlockLaWhitetail Rid g e C t Mu rrayHillRdLa k e Lu cyLa 65th St W Saphi re L aM-591Brenden CtHighover TrHazeltineBlvd LakeHarri s o n R d M-588 LM-A1.1 LM-A1.3.4 LU-A1.5.7 LU-A5.2 LU-A5.3 LU-A1.8 LU-A5.6.1 LM-A1.3 LU-A1.9 LU-A1.5.7.1 LU-A1.10 LM-A1.7 LU-A5.4 LU-A5.5 LU-A5.7 LM-A2.1 LU-A5.6.1 LU-A6.2 LU-A5.5.1 LU-A5.6.2 LU-A6.3 LU-A.5.6.3LU-A5.6.2 LU-A5.6 LM-A1.3.1 LU-A1.9.1 LM-A1.3.2 LU-A5.2.1 LM-A1.3.3 ")Proposed Catch Basins HydroCAD Drainage Areas Subwatersheds Storm Sewer ")Catch Basin !(Storm Manhole #*Storm Flared End Section Project Area National Wetland Inventory SWAMP Scores 0 - 25 25 - 50 50 - 75 75 + Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\LakeLucyRd\Drainage Areas1 Date Saved: 2/13/2020 8:00 PM1 inch = 100 feet 0 100 Feet Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation City of Chanhassen Figure 7 - Catch Basin Spacing Map A #* #* #* #* #* #* #* #*"""""""""" """""""""" """"""""""""" " " """""""""""""" " !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") Lake Lucy RdHazeltine BlvdLakeHarrisonRdBrenden CtHighov e r D r 986 10281 042 104 4 1038990 10301036 99210341036988 1 006 1006104299 6102899010301042103 6 1040101010261040 99610401016 10321042992 996 1004994 1 034 990998 10329929941000 1002 1004 1006 1008 97697898010049829841018 1020 9861 0 2 2 9881028 9901 0 2 4 992 102 6 1 0 3 0 9941040 10381038 1 012101410169981000996996100210061004101099810081000 1006 1030 1034 1 0 3 2 1028 1026 1036 1024 10221020 1006 1018 1002 1004 10161014 1012 10081010 5015 5012 5017 5013 5016 5009A 5102 5101 5011 5104 5106 5105 5015B 5015A ")Proposed Catch Basins Drainage Areas #*Existing Outlet National Wetland Inventory Parcels LiDAR Contours Index Intermediate Storm Sewer !(Storm Manholes Project Area SWAMP Scores 0 - 25 25 - 50 50 - 75 75 + Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\LakeLucyRd\Drainage Areas1 Date Saved: 2/13/2020 8:00 PM1 inch = 100 feet 0 100 Feet Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation City of Chanhassen Figure 8 - Catch Basin Spacing Map B #* #* #* #* #*#* #* #* #*"""""""""""" " "" """"""""""""""""""""""""" " "" "" """ """""""""!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( ")") ") ") ") ")")")")")")")") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") L a k e L u c y Rd Highgate CirBrenden CtManchester Rd 9 7 410021024 1006 974 10349 7 4101 2 97410081038 100010 181 00810081036 1 0581036 10321054 1 01 21 06010021 0 581008 974 1000 1008 1 00610 1 4 1004974 9941 0 08103499210041030 105 6 9901054 1 0 2 8 1 0 1 21020 9 741052 1018 1050 1 0 0 4 104 8 1002 1046100 4 100 4 104 4 104010361038 1042 1032 1034 1030 1 01410321028 978 1 0 1 6 1028 10 141030102410 26 1024 1022 10201018 1016 1022 1012 1014 1 0 2 6 1024 1006 1006 974 990992 994996 1000 1002 998 976 982 984 1004 986 988 980 97 8 10 1 210061010 10085006 5005 5001 5004 5007 5003 5009 5008 5012 5016 5002 5009A 5102 5101 5011 5106 5105 5007 ")Proposed Catch Basins Drainage Areas #*Existing Outlet National Wetland Inventory Parcels LiDAR Contours Index Intermediate Storm Sewer !(Storm Manholes Project Area SWAMP Scores 0 - 25 25 - 50 50 - 75 75 + Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\LakeLucyRd\Drainage Areas1 Date Saved: 2/13/2020 8:00 PM1 inch = 100 feet 0 100 Feet Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation City of Chanhassen Figure 9 - Catch Basin Spacing Map C #* #* #* #* #* #* #*"""""""""""""""""""""""""" " " """ """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ") ") ") ") ") ")")")")")")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ")DiamondCtManchester Rd Ruby La Lake Lucy Rd Highgate Cir Briarwood CtGalpinBlvd998 1044 9989941040 1016 1042 10041036 1038 10 1 2978 1 0121024 1018100610001000 10 1897010321034 994 1 0081022 100810001002998 1 01 210109721030 1008 10169949721028 100410101006 10141026 1 0061022 1002100210 1 4 9961020996996998992992101210001 0 0 8 1014 9 8 21012 1 0 0 6 100 4 100 29961000 10061 0 0 4 1004101810101020 970 998 10 14 9741000974100898810169969761014 97697810089989901012982 996980984986994988990992992 1 01 09949969981000994100210049781006 980982 984986 1 012 988 994 9909921004100210101008 100699610009985006 5005 5001 5004 5007 5003 5002 5000 5001A 5007 ")Proposed Catch Basins Drainage Areas #*Existing Outlet National Wetland Inventory Parcels LiDAR Contours Index Intermediate Storm Sewer !(Storm Manholes Project Area SWAMP Scores 0 - 25 25 - 50 50 - 75 75 + Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 APPENDIX C Public Involvement Meeting We were hoping for a comprehensive city plan. It’s hard to comment without one. The most disappointing issue is a lack of any plans for "Street Calming". No plans to add or enhanced crosswalks is also exempt. A simple street/path resurface hardly warrants a need for a meeting. Sounds like there has not been any recent traffic/flow/speed studies completed to date. We understand the street design and intent. This does not imply that Lake Lucy Road deficiencies don't exist. The most concerning issue is the speeding of the average vehicle along with increased volume. Both are assumed to increase with a nice new smooth road, not to mention the Galpin Road upgrade. Road design is the only proven way to mitigate traffic/pedestrian issues. We are not asking for a total redesign here. You folks are smart, educated and this is your bag. No one else can or will help keep this road safe, efficient and "calming". That's your job... Regards Jayson & Peggy Dreher -2144 Lake Lucy Road-jayson57@msn.com-612-270-7243 Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 APPENDIX D Opinion of Probable Cost WSB Project:LAKE LUCY ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECTDesign By:AOGProject Location:CITY OF CHANHASSENChecked By:NTPCity Project No.:20-03WSB Project No:015301-000Date:3/4/2020ESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATED QUANTITY ESTIMATED COST2021.501 MOBILIZATIONLS 30,710.00$ 1 30,710.00$ 0.75 23,032.50$ 0.25 7,677.50$ 2101.524 CLEARING1 TREE 250.00$ 1 250.00$ 1 250.00$ 2101.524 GRUBBING1 TREE 250.00$ 1 250.00$ 1 250.00$ 2104.502 REMOVE GATE VALVE & BOX1 EACH 700.00$ 1 700.00$ 1 700.00$ 2104.502 REMOVE HYDRANT1 EACH 1,500.00$ 1 1,500.00$ 1 1,500.00$ 2104.502 REMOVE CASTINGEACH 250.00$ 205,000.00$ 1250.00$ 194,750.00$ 2104.502 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH 500.00$ 21,000.00$ 21,000.00$ 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F8.00$ 70560.00$ 70560.00$ 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)L F6.00$ 60360.00$ 60360.00$ 2104.503 REMOVE CURB & GUTTERL F11.00$ 151016,610.00$ 107011,770.00$ 4404,840.00$ 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTS Y26.00$ 601,560.00$ 601,560.00$ 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTS Y20.00$ 501,000.00$ 501,000.00$ 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE WALKS F8.00$ 6004,800.00$ 6004,800.00$ 2104.518 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALKS F6.00$ 7204,320.00$ 7204,320.00$ 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMONC Y30.00$ 1404,200.00$ 1404,200.00$ 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE1 C Y30.00$ 802,400.00$ 802,400.00$ 2123.61 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 165.00$ 101,650.00$ 101,650.00$ 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATIONS Y4.00$ 307012,280.00$ 307012,280.00$ 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5C Y20.00$ 1603,200.00$ 1603,200.00$ 2231.604 BITUMINOUS PATCH SPECIALS Y60.00$ 39623,760.00$ 1408,400.00$ 25615,360.00$ 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.5")S Y2.00$ 1310026,200.00$ 1310026,200.00$ 2301.602 DRILL & GROUT DOWEL BAR (EPOXY COATED)EACH10.00$ 96960.00$ 96960.00$ 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COATGAL3.50$ 14405,040.00$ 14405,040.00$ 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX(2,B)4.0" THICKS Y60.00$ 503,000.00$ 503,000.00$ 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX(3,B)3.0" THICKS Y14.00$ 315044,100.00$ 315044,100.00$ 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,B)TON82.00$ 2040167,280.00$ 2040167,280.00$ 2356.504 BITUMINOUS SEAL COATS Y1.50$ 35505,325.00$ 35505,325.00$ 2356.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COATGAL1.00$ 360360.00$ 360360.00$ 2502.503 4" PERF TP PIPE DRAIN1 L F30.00$ 1654,950.00$ 1654,950.00$ 2502.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING PIPE DRAIN1 EACH 250.00$ 51,250.00$ 51,250.00$ 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL VL F70.00$ 241,680.00$ 241,680.00$ 2503.503 8" DUCTILE IRON PIPE SEWERL F30.00$ 20600.00$ 20600.00$ 2504.602 HYDRANT1 EACH 5,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 2504.602 BOLT & VALVE BOX REPLACEMENT - VALVEEACH 2,500.00$ 820,000.00$ 820,000.00$ 2504.602 BOLT & VALVE BOX REPLACEMENT - HYDRANT & HYDRANT VALVEEACH 3,200.00$ 928,800.00$ 928,800.00$ 2504.602 SACRIFICAL ANODE BAG (32 LB)EACH 350.00$ 175,950.00$ 175,950.00$ 2504.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOX1 EACH 3,400.00$ 13,400.00$ 13,400.00$ 2504.602 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIR1 EACH 350.00$ 31,050.00$ 31,050.00$ 2505.601 UTILITY COORDINATIONLS 2,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 0.751,500.00$ 0.25500.00$ 2506.502 CASTING ASSEMBLYEACH 1,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 2506.502 INSTALL CASTINGEACH 600.00$ 1911,400.00$ 1911,400.00$ 2506.602 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTINGEACH 750.00$ 2015,000.00$ 2015,000.00$ 2506.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTUREEACH 1,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 33,000.00$ 2506.602 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN SPEC (2'X3')EACH 2,800.00$ 514,000.00$ 514,000.00$ 2506.602 GROUT CATCH BASIN OR MANHOLEEACH 475.00$ 104,750.00$ 104,750.00$ 2506.602 CHIMNEY SEALEACH 225.00$ 194,275.00$ 194,275.00$ 2506.602 REMOVE MINERAL DEPOSITSEACH 1,200.00$ 22,400.00$ 22,400.00$ 2506.603 CONSTRUCT 48" DIA SAN MANHOLEL F550.00$ 2312,650.00$ 2312,650.00$ 2506.603 CONSTRUCT 6" INSIDE DROPL F425.00$ 145,950.00$ 145,950.00$ 2521.518 6" CONCRETE WALKS F14.00$ 180025,200.00$ 180025,200.00$ OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTMNDOT SPECIFICATION NO. DESCRIPTION NOTES UNIT ESTIMATED UNIT PRICE PROJECT TOTALESTIMATED TOTAL QUANTITYESTIMATED TOTAL COSTLOCALFUNDING SOURCES.A.P. ###-###-###FUNDING SOURCEBASE BID - MILL AND OVERLAY STREET PAVEMENT 2531.503 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618L F 26.00$ 151039,260.00$ 107027,820.00$ 44011,440.00$ 2531.504 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENTS Y115.00$ 606,900.00$ 606,900.00$ 2531.618 TRUNCATED DOMESS F52.00$ 24012,480.00$ 24012,480.00$ 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROLLS 8,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 0.756,000.00$ 0.252,000.00$ 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTIONEACH 150.00$ 253,750.00$ 253,750.00$ 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWNS Y18.00$ 114020,520.00$ 84015,120.00$ 3005,400.00$ 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR INL F1.50$ 33204,980.00$ 33204,980.00$ 2582.503 24" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP GR INL F13.00$ 36468.00$ 36468.00$ 2582.518 CROSSWALK MULTI COMP GR INS F8.00$ 7205,760.00$ 7205,760.00$ 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATIONS Y4.00$ 655026,200.00$ 655026,200.00$ 2215.504 STABILIZED FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION - PORTLAND CEMENTS Y11.00$ 655072,050.00$ 655072,050.00$ 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON80.00$ 2040163,200.00$ 2040163,200.00$ 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (3,C)TON75.00$ 2040153,000.00$ 2040153,000.00$ 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (2.5")S Y(2.00)$ 13100(26,200.00)$ 13100(26,200.00)$ 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (3,C)TON(82.00)$ 2040(167,280.00)$ 2040(167,280.00)$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL - BASE BID644,798.00$ 490,805.50$ 153,992.50$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (5%)32,239.90$ 24,540.28$ 7,699.63$ SUBTOTAL677,037.90$ 515,345.78$ 161,692.13$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (10%)67,703.79$ 51,534.58$ 16,169.21$ TOTAL - BASE BID744,741.69$ 566,880.35$ 177,861.34$ CONSTRUCTION TOTAL - BID ALTERNATE NO. 1220,970.00$ 220,970.00$ -$ CONTINGENCY TOTAL (5%)11,048.50$ 11,048.50$ -$ SUBTOTAL232,018.50$ 232,018.50$ -$ INDIRECT COST TOTAL (10%)23,201.85$ 23,201.85$ -$ TOTAL - BID ALTERNATE NO. 1255,220.35$ 255,220.35$ -$ TOTAL - BASE BID + BID ALTERNATE NO. 1999,962.04$ 822,100.70$ 177,861.34$ BID ALTERNATE NO. 1 - FULL DEPTH RECLAIM STREET PAVEMENT Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 APPENDIX E Figure 10: Preliminary Assessment Map Preliminary Assessment Roll ?ÌA@ 2 3 19 1 18 4 20 97658 17 1516 11 12 14 13 10Lake Lucy RdGalpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdManchester RdLake Harrison RdHighover DrPinehurst Dr Crestview Dr Br e n d e n C t Topaz Dr Highover Tr H e m l o c k L a Ruby LaCrestview Cir Highgate Cir Briarwood CtAmberwood LaM-588 Ald e r W a y Ed g e w o o d C t 1 inch = 400 feet Document Path: K:\015301-000\GIS\Maps\Figure10_AssessmentMap.mxd Date Saved: 4/6/2020 8:15:22 AMLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project Chanhassen, MN Project Location Assessed Parcels City Owned Parcels Figure 10 - Preliminary Assessment Map 0 400 Feet¯ City ProjectLake Lucy Road Rehabilitation ProjectStreet Improvement Cost (Less 10% Indirect Costs)421,000.00$ Project No.20-03Assessable Cost @ 40%168,400.00$ Assessable Front Footage (48.15%)81,100.00$ Prorated for 31' Residential (86.11%)69,800.00$ Single Family Residential Units20Date:4/7/2020Single Family Unit Assessment Rate3,490.00$ MAP ID PARCEL IDPROPERTY ADDRESSOWNER NAMEOWNER ADDRESSSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT EQUIVALENTSUNIT ASSESSMENT RATE ASSESSMENT AMOUNT1 251460020 2323 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317CHANHASSEN CITYPO BOX 147 Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 2 251470070 2275 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317CLEONE B FOSTER2275 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 3 251470080 2249 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 MARY ANN OLSON TRUST AGREEMENT2249 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 4 258420010 2237 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317ZHIJUN WANG2237 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 5 258420020 2219 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 KENNETH F & KRISTEN L THATCHER2219 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 6 258420030 2201 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 STEPHEN J & LAURIE A KERKVLIET2201 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 7 258420040 2181 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317BRUCE S SMITH414 MAIN ST APT #1 Northport, NY 1176813,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 8 258420050 2165 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317MATTHEW KRAMER2165 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 9 258420060 2151 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317BENJAMIN F SNYDER2151 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 10 258420070 2135 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317IH2 PROPERTY ILLINOIS LP1717 MAIN ST SUITE 2000 Dallas, TX 7520113,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 11 258420080 2117 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317KELLY P DAVIES2117 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 12 258420100 2122 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317KAREN M RYAN2122 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 13 258420090 2144 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 DREHER FAMILY WEALTH TRUST2144 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 14 251470060 2244 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317GINA B SAUER REV TRUST2244 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 15 251450030 2340 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317BARBARA A MILLER TRUST2340 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 16 251450020 2360 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317SUSANNE SCHAER2360 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 17 251450010 2380 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317KATHY A FIELD TRUST2380 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 18 253490030 2432 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317BRUCE B & HOLLY H OLSON2432 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 19 253490020 2444 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317ADAM G LUKENS2444 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ 20 253490010 2450 LAKE LUCY RD Chanhassen, MN 55317 MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES INC18986 LAKE DR E Chanhassen, MN 5531713,490.00$ 3,490.00$ Lake Lucy RoadPreliminary Assessment Roll Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-03 Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project City of Chanhassen, MN WSB Project No. R-015301-00 APPENDIX F Geotechnical Report Extended Speed Summary Report Generated by Joe Lefevere from City of Chanhassen on Feb 24, 2020 at 5:51:22 PM Site: Lake Lucy and Brendan Court, NB Time of Day: 0:00 to 23:59 Dates: 2/17/2020 to 2/23/2020 Overall Summary Total Days of Data: 7 Speed Limit: 30 Average Speed: 27.09 50th Percentile Speed: 27.1 85th Percentile Speed: 29.97 Pace Speed Range: 23-33 Minimum Speed: 5 Maximum Speed: 44 Display Status: Display Off Average Volume per Day: 620.4 Total Volume: 4343 Extended Speed Summary Report Generated by Joe Lefevere from City of Chanhassen on Feb 24, 2020 at 5:51:22 PM Site: Lake Lucy and Brendan Court, NB Time of Day: 0:00 to 23:59 Dates: 2/17/2020 to 2/23/2020 Hours Sign Mode Speed Limit Total # Vehicles Total # Violator % Violator Avg # Vehicles Avg # Violator Min Speed Max Speed Avg Speed 50% Speed 85% Speed Sign Effectiveness 0:00 Display Off 30 33 0 0.0 %5.5 0.0 10 38 25.9 25.1 27.6 52.7 % 1:00 Display Off 30 23 0 0.0 %3.8 0.0 5 37 24.6 23.4 27.6 41.0 % 2:00 Display Off 30 4 0 0.0 %2.0 0.0 26 31 27.5 28.0 28.5 50.0 % 3:00 Display Off 30 7 0 0.0 %2.3 0.0 17 28 25.8 25.8 26.2 28.0 % 4:00 Display Off 30 0 0 N/A 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/A 5:00 Display Off 30 2 0 0.0 %1.0 0.0 24 25 24.5 24.5 24.5 0.0 % 6:00 Display Off 30 25 0 0.0 %4.2 0.0 20 38 28.2 26.1 30.0 24.5 % 7:00 Display Off 30 40 0 0.0 %6.7 0.0 7 36 27.7 27.3 30.8 29.0 % 8:00 Display Off 30 190 0 0.0 %31.7 0.0 6 36 27.2 27.7 30.7 33.7 % 9:00 Display Off 30 389 0 0.0 %64.8 0.0 5 40 27.8 27.9 31.0 41.6 % 10:00 Display Off 30 250 0 0.0 %41.7 0.0 5 37 27.5 28.0 30.8 43.8 % 11:00 Display Off 30 168 0 0.0 %28.0 0.0 5 38 26.8 27.2 31.0 35.5 % 12:00 Display Off 30 208 0 0.0 %34.7 0.0 10 39 28.1 28.2 31.0 31.2 % 13:00 Speed Display, Display Off 30 254 1 0.4 %36.3 0.1 6 44 27.6 27.9 30.7 46.3 % 14:00 Speed Display, Display Off 30 286 0 0.0 %40.9 0.0 5 40 27.7 28.1 31.6 37.3 % 15:00 Speed Display, Display Off 30 297 0 0.0 %42.4 0.0 10 39 28.6 28.5 31.4 30.8 % 16:00 Speed Display, Display Off 30 395 0 0.0 %56.4 0.0 5 39 27.8 28.1 31.1 41.3 % 17:00 Display Off 30 496 0 0.0 %70.9 0.0 9 39 27.9 28.1 31.6 45.0 % 18:00 Display Off 30 437 0 0.0 %62.4 0.0 5 37 28.1 28.5 31.2 42.1 % 19:00 Display Off 30 307 0 0.0 %43.9 0.0 5 39 26.0 26.6 29.6 39.8 % 20:00 Display Off 30 185 0 0.0 %26.4 0.0 12 38 26.9 26.9 31.0 29.7 % 21:00 Display Off 30 162 0 0.0 %23.1 0.0 9 39 27.5 27.8 30.9 28.7 % 22:00 Display Off 30 102 0 0.0 %14.6 0.0 9 40 26.6 27.1 30.5 27.9 % 23:00 Display Off 30 83 0 0.0 %11.9 0.0 16 36 27.0 26.6 30.0 33.9 % Total Vol/Avg Speeds 4343 1 0.0 %655.5 0.1 5 44 27.1 27.1 30.0 35.4 % Total/Avg w/o Feedback 4089 0 0.0 %619.2 0.0 5 40 27.1 27.1 29.9 34.9 % Extended Speed Summary Report Generated by Joe Lefevere from City of Chanhassen on Feb 24, 2020 at 5:51:22 PM Site: Lake Lucy and Brendan Court, NB Time of Day: 0:00 to 23:59 Dates: 2/17/2020 to 2/23/2020 Total/Avg w/ Feedback 254 1 0.4 %36.3 0.1 6 44 27.6 27.9 30.7 46.3 % ####################################"F)³C H ±"F) LakeMinnewashta Lake Lucy LakeAnn Lotus Lake Lake Susan LakeRiley LakeHarrison Rice MarshLake Rice Lake LakeSaintJoe LakeVirginia LakeMinnewashtaRegional Park(County Park) HermanField Park RoundhousePark MinnewashtaHeights Park PheasantHillPark NorthLotusLakePark CarverBeachPark MinnesotaLandscapeArboretum Minnesota Landscape Arboretum ChanhassenNaturePreserve Bluff CreekPreserve BluffCreekPreserve BluffCreekPreserve PioneerPassPark Bluff Creek Golf Course Hesse FarmPreserve Seminary FenScientific and Natural Area(SNA) Raquet WildlifeManagement Area(WMA) Raquet WildlifeManagement Area(WMA) MN Valley NationalWildlife Refuge FoxwoodsPreserve RileyRidgePark BandimerePark Lake SusanPark LakeSusanPreserve LakeAnnPark MeadowGreenPark SouthLotusLakePark PowerHillPark PleasantViewPreserve M innesota RiverK eber P ondChristmasLake BrendanPond ?©A@?©A@?©A@ ?©A@ +¢ +¢ +¢ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ ?«A@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ ?ÌA@ ?ÌA@ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ GoWX GrWX GrWX GrWX GïWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GnWX GnWX GnWX GÇWX GÇWX GÇWX GïWX Year & Pav ement Maintenance Type 2020 - Mill & Overlay 2021 - Mill & Overlay 2022 - Mill & Overlay 2023 - Mill & Overlay 2024 - Mill & Overlay 2022 - Reconstruction 2023 - Reconstruction 2024 - Reconstruction 2020 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) 2021 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) 2022 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) 2023 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) 2024 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) #######2020 - County/State Project #######2021 - County/State Project 5 -Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a nPavement M a n a g e m e n t Date Created: 11/13/2019 Document Path: K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\StreetCIP_2019\5YearCIP.mxd Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 4,000Feet 0 0.5Mile Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2020 2024thru Department Street Improvements Description Annual project to rehabilitate and reconstruct streets in the City. The following streets are scheduled to be completed in 2020, future areas will be determined by available funds and condition of the streets. 2020 Minnewashta Parkway (MSA, 2020 & 2021) and Lake Lucy-TH41 to Galpin Blvd (MSA) Krvers Point, Willow View, Twin Maple and Basswood Stone Creek Drive, Boulder Road, Stone Creek Ct, Stone Creek Ln, etc. Hidden Lane, Hidden Circle, Hidden Court, Marsh Drive, Sinnen Circle and Dakota Lane Lake Lucy, Nez Perce, Vineland Court and Troendle Circle Brendan Court Project #ST-012 Priority n/a Justification The City uses a Pavement Management System to monitor the condition of the City streets. While proper preventative maintenance extends the life of the street and is cost effective, a street will eventually deteriorate to a point that major maintenance is required. Rehabilitation projects extend the life of the street. In cases when utilities or poor sub grade needs to be replaced or where streets have deteriorated to a point where rehabilitation will no longer be practical, reconstruction of the street is necessary. A feasibility study is written to consider the merits of the project and scope of work. Budget Impact/Other This project may decrease maintenance costs. Useful Life Unassigned Project Name Annual Street Improvement Program Category Streets/Highways Type Improvement Account #2 Account #1 601-xxxx-4751 Total Project Cost:$56,694,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20202021202220232024Expenditures 30,664,0006,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000Construction 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total Total20202021202220232024FundingSources 17,620,0002,582,500 3,637,500 3,700,000 3,800,000 3,900,000Assessment/Revolving Assess Fund 3,333,0001,716,500 1,516,500 100,000MSA 1,685,000192,500 517,500 325,000 325,000 325,000SewerUtilityFund 2,771,000185,500 785,500 600,000 600,000 600,000SurfaceWaterUtilityFund 5,255,0001,550,000 1,605,000 700,000 700,000 700,000WaterUtilityFund 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total 89 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 13, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CALLING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE LAKE LUCY RD STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 20-03 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted December 9, 2019, a report has been prepared by WSB and Associates with reference to the above-referenced project, and this report is being received by the Council on April 13, 2020, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such project in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting properties for a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the street improvements of $421,000. 2. Public hearing for the proposed improvements within the Lake Lucy Rd Street Rehabilitation Project No. 20-03 shall be held on April 27, 2020, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:00 PM. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Resolution No. 2020­XX: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2020 Sealcoat Project Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.8. Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­07 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution accepting bids and awarding a contract for the 2020 Sealcoat Project to Pearson Bros., Inc.for roadway sealcoating in the amount of $190,578.90.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND Annually, the city has completed a sealcoat project to extend the life of its streets.  The Pavement Management Program identified the streets in the project for maintenance this year.  Staff visited each street to visually review the pavement condition and confirm sealcoating is required. DISCUSSION A sealcoat program is a cost­effective tool to protect the capital asset of a street and extend the life of the street system. Sealcoating is the application of asphalt emulsion followed immediately with an aggregate cover. Sealcoating of streets is beneficial because it: Can delay or eliminate further aging of pavement due to water and sun Seals to provide a moisture barrier Fills in raveled pavement areas Enriches under­asphalt pavement Seals cracks temporarily or permanently Performs minor leveling Restores surface friction to improve wheel grip Economically prolongs the life of existing pavements It is estimated that a sealcoat application extends the life of pavement from three to six years at a fraction of the cost of street rehabilitation or bituminous overlay projects. It is, therefore, more cost effective to sealcoat roadways when fewer pavement distresses are present versus letting the pavement deteriorate until major, costly rehabilitation or reconstruction projects are required. BIDS RECIEVED CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution No. 2020­XX: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2020 Sealcoat ProjectSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.8.Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­07PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution accepting bids and awarding a contract for the 2020 Sealcoat Project toPearson Bros., Inc.for roadway sealcoating in the amount of $190,578.90.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDAnnually, the city has completed a sealcoat project to extend the life of its streets.  The Pavement ManagementProgram identified the streets in the project for maintenance this year.  Staff visited each street to visually review thepavement condition and confirm sealcoating is required.DISCUSSIONA sealcoat program is a cost­effective tool to protect the capital asset of a street and extend the life of the streetsystem. Sealcoating is the application of asphalt emulsion followed immediately with an aggregate cover. Sealcoating ofstreets is beneficial because it:Can delay or eliminate further aging of pavement due to water and sunSeals to provide a moisture barrierFills in raveled pavement areasEnriches under­asphalt pavementSeals cracks temporarily or permanentlyPerforms minor levelingRestores surface friction to improve wheel gripEconomically prolongs the life of existing pavementsIt is estimated that a sealcoat application extends the life of pavement from three to six years at a fraction of the cost ofstreet rehabilitation or bituminous overlay projects. It is, therefore, more cost effective to sealcoat roadways whenfewer pavement distresses are present versus letting the pavement deteriorate until major, costly rehabilitation orreconstruction projects are required. BIDS RECIEVED City staff solicited bids by advertising in the local newspaper and QuestCDN three weeks prior to the bid opening.  On March 26, 2020, three bids were received for the 2020 Sealcoat Project No. 20­07.  Bid amounts for the project are shown below: Bidder Bid Total Pearson Bros., Inc.*   $190,578.90 ASTECH Corp.$211,468.50 Allied Blacktop Company   $224,915.60 *Indicates low grand total bidder On average, all bids were under the engineer's estimate by 18%, with the low bidder, Pearson Bros., Inc., being under the engineer's estimate by 25.2%.  As bids were much lower than the engineer's estimate, staff compared the 2020 Sealcoat low bid with the 2019 low bid regarding overall unit costs.  In 2019 it was $1.55 per square yard for sealcoating and $2.15 per pound of crack sealing material, compared to this years bid of $1.28 per square yard for sealcoating and $1.57 per pound for crack sealing. That's a reduction of 17% and 27% for sealcoating and cracksealing, respectively, from 2019 to 2020. Pearson Bros., Inc. has completed previous projects in the City of Chanhassen.  Their past work has been acceptable. Sealcoating activities will tentatively start this summer for streets. City staff will send out notifications to all affected property owners prior to work commencing.  This project was budgeted for 2020 in the CIP Pavement Management (ST­018).  The remaining funds in this budget item are used for in­house projects such as pothole patching, curb repairs, sidewalk repairs, and other miscellaneous street and trail repairs.  Due to the low costs and lower than anticipated bids associated with the 2020 Sealcoat project, there is a possibility for a larger investment into these in­house projects, such as the pothole patching program.  Typically, the annual sealcoat project is built­out to allow for $50,000­$60,000 to be allocated to in­house maintenance programs, described above and warranted by the CIP. With a CIP budget of $393,000 and the reduction from the typical in­house maintenance programs, that leaves $333,000 for the annual sealcoat build­out.  However, this year an additional $60,000 was invested in a standalone pothole patching program, leaving $273,000.  With the low bid being approximately $191,000, there is an additional $82,000 to invest in these other maintenance activities. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CIP Sheet Seal Coat Map Bid Tabulation and Comparison ­ All Bidders Bid Tabulation and Comparison ­ Low Bidder CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 13, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 2020 SEALCOAT PROJECT NO. 20-07 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2020 Sealcoat Project, three bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Total Bid Pearson Bros., Inc.* $190,578.90 Asphalt Surface Technologies Corp. $211,468.50 Allied Blacktop Company $224,915.60 *Indicates low bidder AND WHEREAS, it appears that Pearson Bros., Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Pearson Bros., Inc. in the name of the City of Chanhassen for the 2020 Sealcoat Project No. 20-07 according to the plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. 2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained unto a contract has been signed. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT "F)³CH ±"F) GqWX ?©A@ GqWX ?©A@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ ?ÌA@ ?©A@ GïWX GïWX ?ûA@ GoWX GrWX GrWX +¢ +¢ GnWX GÇWX GÇWX GïWX 32 1 4 5 6 7 LakeVirginia ChristmasLake LotusLake LakeSusan RiceMarshLake LakeRiley RiceLake LakeSt. Joe LakeMinnewashta Lake Ann LakeLucy Ü Date: 3/11/2020 K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\2020 Seat Coat Bid Book\SealCoat2020_OverviewMap_11x17.mxd202 0 Seal Coat Pr ojectOverview M ap 0 21 Miles 2020 Crack Seal Only 2020 Seal Coat and Crack Seal ³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers/Streams Lakes Parks City Boundary Map Number "F) ?«A@ ?«A@ LakeMinnewashta MinnewashtaHeights ParkCathcartPark Yellowstone Trl M e a d o w L n Bar berryCirP a r k L n Maple Ave LandingsCtW 62nd St M aplewood CirShore Dr SpruceHillCtShore wood Oaks Dr Eureka RdPond View DrGreenbriarAveAr bor LnIronwood Rd SeamansDrD a rtm o u th D r62n d St W S h o r ewoodOaksDrCartway LnChurch RdCypressDrL a n d in g s D rH i g h w a y 7 MinnewashtaPkwyHighway 7 Fir Tree AveOak L e a f T r l Dogwood AveStrawberry LnElm Tree AveHighway 7Ü Date: 3/11/2020 K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\2020 Seat Coat Bid Book\SealCoat2020_Map1_11x17.mxd2020 Se al Coat Proje ctMap 1 0 800400 Feet 2020 Seal Coat and Crack Seal ³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers/Streams Lakes Parks City Boundary Parcel Boundaries BrendanPond LakeHarrison MinnewashtaRegionalPark ManchesterPark LakeAnn ParkPreserve Top a z Dr Highover Ct SHazeltine BlvdEmerald Ln Highgate Cir Briarwood CtBr e n d e n Ct WynsongLnHighover Ct NHighoverWay RubyLnH i g h o v e r T r l Highover DrLake Luc y R d SapphireLnHighover LnGalpin BlvdGalpin BlvdManchesterDrHighover DrLake Lucy Rd LakeHarrisonRdLakeLucyRd L a k e H a rri s o n C ir Ü Date: 3/11/2020 K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\2020 Seat Coat Bid Book\SealCoat2020_Map2_11x17.mxd2020 Se al Coat Proje ctMap 2 0 600300 Feet 2020 Seal Coat and Crack Seal ³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers/Streams Lakes Parks City Boundary Parcel Boundaries LakeHarrison LakeLucy ManchesterPark LakeAnn ParkPreserve Lakeway DrTopa z Dr Lake Lucy RdLake Harrison Cir LucyRdg Ct Highgate Cir Briarwood CtSteller Ct Emerald L n LucyRdgLnRubyLnWynsong Ln SapphireLnGalpin BlvdGalpin BlvdManchesterDrLakeLucyRd Lake Lucy Rd LakeHarrisonRdÜ Date: 3/11/2020 K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\2020 Seat Coat Bid Book\SealCoat2020_Map3_11x17.mxd2020 Se al Coat Proje ctMap 3 0 600300 Feet 2020 Seal Coat and Crack Seal ³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers/Streams Lakes Parks City Boundary Parcel Boundaries MinnewashtaRegionalPark HermanField Park PheasantHill Park IndependentSchoolDistrict 276 Galpin BlvdMurrayHillRdMoline CirHazeltine BlvdMurrayCtPheasant Cir Lake Lucy Rd63rd St W H i g h w a y 7 Partridge Cir Chestnut LnMelody LnC r e s t v i e w Ci r Galpin BlvdM elody Hill CirOriole AveMayflowerRdS teller C irCardinalDrCardinal AveW h i t e t a il R d g C t Koehnen CirOrchard L n PheasantDr Sommergate Melody Hill WoodDuckLnLake Lucy Ln 64th St W White Dove Dr W 65th St La k e L in denDrMelody Hill Rd RingneckDrChaska RdS u m m itAveCrestview DrHummingbird RdHazeltine BlvdÜ Date: 3/11/2020 K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\2020 Seat Coat Bid Book\SealCoat2020_Map4_11x17.mxd2020 Se al Coat Proje ctMap 4 0 800400 Feet 2020 Seal Coat and Crack Seal ³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers/Streams Lakes Parks City Boundary Parcel Boundaries ?©A@ ?©A@ ?ÌA@ ChanhassenNaturePreserve MN LandscapeArboretum HarvestLnAutumnRdgAveHarvest W ayVillage PlVill a geStV illa g e L n Hazeltine BlvdC o u lte r B l v d Autumn Rdg LnVasserma n Trl A utu mnRdgWayCorporate Pl Century BlvdCenturyBlvdGalpin BlvdArboretum Blvd A r b o r e t u m B l v d Water Tower Pl W 78th St Hazeltine BlvdCoulter Blvd Arboretum Blvd Ü Date: 3/11/2020 K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\2020 Seat Coat Bid Book\SealCoat2020_Map5_11x17.mxd2020 Se al Coat Proje ctMap 5 0 800400 Feet 2020 Seal Coat and Crack Seal ³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers/Streams Lakes Parks City Boundary Parcel Boundaries "F)³CH ±GqWX ?©A@ LotusLake KerberPondLake Ann LakeLucy CarverBeach Park MeadowGreenPark GreenwoodShores Park LakeAnnPark ChanhassenPond Park SouthLotusLake Park ChanhassenEstates Mini Park CityCenterPark Lake AnnParkPreserve Topaz D r Arboretum BlvdLakeAnnP ark Dr SShoreDr Redwing Ln MarketBlvdPi m a L n K e lly C tLake Dr EQuail CirPark Ct Na v a j o Dr Derby DrCharis CtChan View ParkDrUt i ca Ter RubyLnPimlico LnW 77th St Hill StYu ma Dr Debbie LnW 78th St KristieLn Deerfield Trl Iroquois187th Ave WMcGlynn Dr Longview CirS a n ta V e r a D r Chanhassen RdHuronHighland Dr TartanCurveD e l R i o D r Laredo DrKiowaF o x H ill D rKerberBlvd Big Woods Blvd Maple L e a f D rChoctaw Cir Woodhill Dr W 7 9 th S tRedman LnButte Ct Sierra TrlLotusTrl Dakota AvePo n t i a c L nCh a p a r r a l LnKimberlyLnTw ilight TrlErie AveShawnee LnW 7 8 t h S tBighornDrCheyenneTrlPowers BlvdPontiac CirKer be r Blvd Nature Ln78th St WPowers BlvdM a r k e t S tTecumseh LnW 192nd AveUtica LnW 78thSt FrontierTrlArboretum Blvd W 7 8 t h S t Arboretum Blvd Ü Date: 3/11/2020 K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\2020 Seat Coat Bid Book\SealCoat2020_Map6_11x17.mxd2020 Se al Coat Proje ctMap 6 0 1,800900 Feet 2020 Crack Seal Only ³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers/Streams Lakes Parks City Boundary Parcel Boundaries ?©A@ GqWX LakeAnn Park LakeSusanPark W 78th St Mal l ory Ct Park Ct Up l a n d Cir W 7 8 t h S t LakeDrW McGlynn Dr L a k e D rPark Pl MotorplexCtAudubon RdPa r k Dr Powers BlvdArboretum Blvd P ark R d Coulter Blvd Arboretum Blvd P a r k Rd W 78th StArboretum Blvd Ü Date: 3/11/2020 K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\2020 Seat Coat Bid Book\SealCoat2020_Map7_11x17.mxd2020 Se al Coat Proje ctMap 7 0 800400 Feet 2020 Crack Seal Only ³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers/Streams Lakes Parks City Boundary Parcel Boundaries Cros swalk St ripin g Leg en d City Bou nd ary March 5, 2020 Ma p P owered By Da taL ink 1 in = 60 ft ± Prepared by Henricksen, Erik 3/27/2020 Page 1 Avgerage Average Item Description Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total #Quantity Units Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price Price 1 MNDOT 2356.506 CRS-2P BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEALCOAT 26000 GAL $1.78 $46,280.00 $1.76 $45,760.00 $1.50 $39,000.00 $0.10 $2,600.00 $1.12 $29,120.00 2 MNDOT 2356.506 FA-2 MODIFIED 1/8" CLASS A DRESSER (TRAP ROCK)98000 SY $1.19 $116,620.00 $0.82 $80,360.00 $1.12 $109,760.00 $1.47 $144,060.00 $1.14 $111,393.33 3 CRACKSEALING MATERIAL 36000 LB $2.49 $89,640.00 $1.57 $56,520.00 $1.52 $54,720.00 $1.99 $71,640.00 $1.69 $60,960.00 4 MNDOT 2582.503 PAVT MSSG (LT ARROW ) PAINT 4 EA $60.00 $240.00 $84.00 $336.00 $100.00 $400.00 $70.00 $280.00 $84.67 $338.67 5 MNDOT 2582.503 PAVT MSSG (RT ARROW) PAINT 1 EA $60.00 $60.00 $84.00 $84.00 $100.00 $100.00 $70.00 $70.00 $84.67 $84.67 9 MNDOT 2582.503 4” SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT 1300 LF $0.10 $130.00 $0.48 $624.00 $0.21 $273.00 $0.40 $520.00 $0.36 $472.33 10 MNDOT 2582.503 6” SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT 100 LF $1.85 $185.00 $2.16 $216.00 $4.73 $473.00 $1.80 $180.00 $2.90 $289.67 11 MNDOT 2582.503 12” SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT 50 LF $3.00 $150.00 $3.84 $192.00 $7.35 $367.50 $3.20 $160.00 $4.80 $239.83 12 MNDOT 2582.503 36” SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT 90 LF $6.90 $621.00 $33.41 $3,006.90 $47.50 $4,275.00 $27.84 $2,505.60 $36.25 $3,262.50 13 MNDOT 2582.503 4” SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT 1100 LF $0.10 $110.00 $0.48 $528.00 $0.21 $231.00 $0.40 $440.00 $0.36 $399.67 14 MNDOT 2582.503 4” DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT 2700 LF $0.20 $540.00 $0.96 $2,592.00 $0.42 $1,134.00 $0.80 $2,160.00 $0.73 $1,962.00 15 MNDOT 2582.503 12” SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT 100 LF $2.90 $290.00 $3.60 $360.00 $7.35 $735.00 $3.00 $300.00 $4.65 $465.00 TOTALS $254,866.00 $190,578.90 $211,468.50 $224,915.60 $208,987.67 Estimate Pearson Astech Allied $162,900.00 $126,120.00 $148,760.00 $146,660.00 $89,640.00 $56,520.00 $54,720.00 $71,640.00 $252,540.00 $182,640.00 $203,480.00 $218,300.00 Total Rock & Emulsion Crack Sealing TOTALS 20-07 Sealcoat Project Bid Tabulation and Comparison Pearson Bros, Inc.ASTECH Corp.Engineer's Estimate Allied Blacktop Prepared by Henricksen, Erik 3/31/2020 Page 1 20-07 Sealcoat Project Close Up Comparison for:Pearson Bros, Inc. Engineer's Estimate Avgerage Average Pearson Bros, Inc.Difference From Average Bid Item Description Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price #Quantity Units Price Price Price Price Price Price $$%$$% 1 MNDOT 2356.506 CRS-2P BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR 26000 GAL $1.78 $46,280.00 $1.12 $29,120.00 $1.76 $45,760.00 -$0.02 -$520.00 -1.1%$0.64 $16,640.00 57.1% 2 MNDOT 2356.506 FA-2 MODIFIED 1/8" CLASS A DRESSE 98000 SY $1.19 $116,620.00 $1.14 $111,393.33 $0.82 $80,360.00 -$0.37 -$36,260.00 -31.1%-$0.32 -$31,033.33 -27.9% 3 CRACKSEALING MATERIAL 36000 LB $2.49 $89,640.00 $1.69 $60,960.00 $1.57 $56,520.00 -$0.92 -$33,120.00 -36.9%-$0.12 -$4,440.00 -7.3% 4 MNDOT 2582.503 PAVT MSSG (LT ARROW ) PAINT 4 EA $60.00 $240.00 $84.67 $338.67 $84.00 $336.00 $24.00 $96.00 40.0%-$0.67 -$2.67 -0.8% 5 MNDOT 2582.503 PAVT MSSG (RT ARROW) PAINT 1 EA $60.00 $60.00 $84.67 $84.67 $84.00 $84.00 $24.00 $24.00 40.0%-$0.67 -$0.67 -0.8% 9 MNDOT 2582.503 4” SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT 1300 LF $0.10 $130.00 $0.36 $472.33 $0.48 $624.00 $0.38 $494.00 380.0%$0.12 $151.67 32.1% 10 MNDOT 2582.503 6” SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT 100 LF $1.85 $185.00 $2.90 $289.67 $2.16 $216.00 $0.31 $31.00 16.8%-$0.74 -$73.67 -25.4% 11 MNDOT 2582.503 12” SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT 50 LF $3.00 $150.00 $4.80 $239.83 $3.84 $192.00 $0.84 $42.00 28.0%-$0.96 -$47.83 -19.9% 12 MNDOT 2582.503 36” SOLID LINE WHITE-PAINT 90 LF $6.90 $621.00 $36.25 $3,262.50 $33.41 $3,006.90 $26.51 $2,385.90 384.2%-$2.84 -$255.60 -7.8% 13 MNDOT 2582.503 4” SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT 1100 LF $0.10 $110.00 $0.36 $399.67 $0.48 $528.00 $0.38 $418.00 380.0%$0.12 $128.33 32.1% 14 MNDOT 2582.503 4” DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAIN 2700 LF $0.20 $540.00 $0.73 $1,962.00 $0.96 $2,592.00 $0.76 $2,052.00 380.0%$0.23 $630.00 32.1% 15 MNDOT 2582.503 12” SOLID LINE YELLOW-PAINT 100 LF $2.90 $290.00 $4.65 $465.00 $3.60 $360.00 $0.70 $70.00 24.1%-$1.05 -$105.00 -22.6% TOTALS $254,866.00 $208,987.67 $190,578.90 -$64,287.10 -25.2%-$18,408.77 -8.8% Difference from Engr Estimate CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Approve Purchase, Park Equipment Replacement Schedule for Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.9. Prepared By Adam Beers, Park Maintenance File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the recommended 2020 Park Equipment Replacement Schedule quotes to Northland Recreation in the amount of $110,000 for playground equipment replacement at Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY This year's park and trail capital improvement program contains $255,000 for a variety of work to be completed as a part of the Park Equipment Replacement schedule. $110,000 has been allocated for the purchase and installation of new playground equipment at Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach. Four companies were selected to participate in the RFP process providing playground equipment designs. Costs include supervised installation from vendor representatives and factory warranty on equipment. Residents of the Power Hill Park neighborhood had the option to vote online or attend an in­person selection workshop that was scheduled at the Chanhassen Recreation Center on March 11, 2020  from 6­8 pm to select the preferred design. The Park and Recreation Commission were tasked with selecting the design for the Lake Ann Park Beach playground.   Both the residents of the Power Hill neighborhood and the Park and Recreation commission selected Northland Recreation as the preferred design for both Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach. RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission and residents of the Power Hill Park neighborhood both selected Northland Recreation as the preferred design for both Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach.  Staff recommends the City Council approve the Park Equipment Replacement Schedule quotes to Northland Recreation in the amount of $110,000 for playground equipment at both locations.  Funds for the project are included in the 2020 Capital Improvement Program.  CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectApprove Purchase, Park Equipment Replacement Schedule for Power Hill Park and Lake AnnPark BeachSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.9.Prepared By Adam Beers, Park Maintenance File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the recommended 2020 Park Equipment Replacement Schedule quotes to NorthlandRecreation in the amount of $110,000 for playground equipment replacement at Power Hill Park and Lake AnnPark Beach."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThis year's park and trail capital improvement program contains $255,000 for a variety of work to be completed as apart of the Park Equipment Replacement schedule. $110,000 has been allocated for the purchase and installation ofnew playground equipment at Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach. Four companies were selected toparticipate in the RFP process providing playground equipment designs. Costs include supervised installation fromvendor representatives and factory warranty on equipment.Residents of the Power Hill Park neighborhood had the option to vote online or attend an in­person selectionworkshop that was scheduled at the Chanhassen Recreation Center on March 11, 2020  from 6­8 pm to select thepreferred design.The Park and Recreation Commission were tasked with selecting the design for the Lake Ann Park Beachplayground.  Both the residents of the Power Hill neighborhood and the Park and Recreation commission selected NorthlandRecreation as the preferred design for both Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach.RECOMMENDATIONThe Park and Recreation Commission and residents of the Power Hill Park neighborhood both selected NorthlandRecreation as the preferred design for both Power Hill Park and Lake Ann Park Beach.  Staff recommends the CityCouncil approve the Park Equipment Replacement Schedule quotes to Northland Recreation in the amount of $110,000 for playground equipment at both locations.  Funds for the project are included in the 2020 Capital Improvement Program.  ATTACHMENTS: Lake Ann Beach ­ Design Proposal Lake Ann Beach Quote Power Hill ­ Design Proposal Power Hill Quote CIP Sheet PK&T ­ 141   3DJHRI  3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ,QF (86+Z\ 0RQHWW02    4827(52  3URMHFW5BB   &,7<2)&+$1+$66(1 /$.($11%($&+3$5.  %LOO7R3URMHFW1DPH /RFDWLRQ33UHSDUHGE\ $GDP%HHUV%LOO-RKKQVRQ &LW\RI&KDQKDVVHQ 32%R[ &KDQKDVVHQ01  SKRQH  DEHHUV#FLFKDQKDVVHQPQXV      6KLS7R$GGUHVV(QG8VHU  &LW\RI&KDQKDVVHQ 3XEOLF:RUNV 3DUN3ODFH &KDQKDVVHQ01    4XRWH1XPEHU 52 4XRWH'DWH  9DOLG)RU 'D\V)URP4XRWH'DWH  &203/(7(3/$<$5($%</,77/(7,.(6&200(5&,$/3(5'5$:,1*±,1&/8'(6  $JH.LG%XLOGHU3OD\6WUXFWXUH 7ZR7LHU3OD\JURXQG'HVLJQZ$FFHVVIURP´ ´'HFNV 0D[3OD\6ZLQJ6HWZ%HOW7RWDQG$'$$FFHVVLEOH6HDW 6WDQGQ6SLQ6SLQQHU 6KLSSLQJWR&KDQKDVVHQ 6XSHUYLVLRQRI,QVWDOODWLRQZLWK&LW\&UHZ 9ROXQWHHUV 7KDWFK%DPERR5RRIRQ´+LJK'HFN±.LG%XLOGHU    6KLSSLQJ,QFOXGHG 7D[1RW,QFOXGHG 7RWDO  1RWH$ERYHSULFHVDUHIRUHTXLSPHQWDQGVXSHUYLVLRQRQO\$OOVLWHZRUNFRQFUHWHFXUELQJVLGHZDONVHQJLQHHUHGZRRG ILEHUUHVLOLHQWVXUIDFLQJHWF«LVE\RZQHU      3DJHRI  0DNH3XUFKDVH2UGHUV2XW7R  0DNH&KHFNV3D\DEOH7R 3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ,QF3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ,QF 5HPLW3XUFKDVH2UGHUV7R5HPLW&KHFNV7R 3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ,QF $WWHQWLRQ6DOHV$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (86+Z\ 0RQHWW0LVVRXUL86$  3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ 32%R[ 'DOODV7;   127(  $SSOLFDEOHVDOHVWD[HVZLOOEHFRQILUPHGRQFHRUGHUDQGDQ\WD[FHUWLILFDWHVDUHUHFHLYHG ‚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³33/7´ 6DOHV5HSUHVHQWDWLYHLVQRWDXWKRUL]HGWRVLJQWKLV4XRWHRQEHKDOIRI33/7RU&XVWRPHUDQG VLJQHG4XRWHVFDQQRWEHDFFHSWHGIURP6DOHV5HSUHVHQWDWLYH7RVXEPLWWKLVRIIHUSOHDVHVLJQEHORZDQGIRUZDUGD FRPSOHWHVLJQHGFRS\RIWKLV4XRWHGLUHFWO\WR³33/76DOHV$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ´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¶VSURGXFWOLWHUDWXUHDQG WKHPRVWFXUUHQW&RQVXPHU3URGXFW6DIHW\&RPPLVVLRQ+DQGERRNIRU3XEOLF3OD\JURXQG6DIHW\   'HIDXOW 5HPHGLHV  'HOLQTXHQF\ &KDUJHV  &XVWRPHU¶V IDLOXUH WR SD\ DQ\ LQYRLFH ZKHQ GXH RU LWV IDLOXUH WR RWKHUZLVHFRPSO\ZLWKWKHWHUPVRIWKLV4XRWHVKDOOFRQVWLWXWHDGHIDXOWXQGHUDOOXQVDWLVILHGLQYRLFHV (YHQWRI'HIDXOW  8SRQDQ(YHQWRI'HIDXOW33/7VKDOOKDYHDOOUHPHGLHVDYDLODEOHWRLWDWODZRUHTXLW\LQFOXGLQJZLWKRXWOLPLWDWLRQDOO UHPHGLHVDIIRUGHGDVHFXUHGFUHGLWRUXQGHUWKH8QLIRUP&RPPHUFLDO&RGH&XVWRPHUDJUHHVWRDVVLVWDQGFRRSHUDWHZLWK 33/7WRDFFRPSOLVKLWVILOLQJDQGHQIRUFHPHQWRIPHFKDQLF¶VRURWKHUOLHQVZLWKUHVSHFWWRWKH(TXLSPHQWRULWVORFDWLRQRULWV UHSRVVHVVLRQ RI WKH (TXLSPHQW DQG &XVWRPHU H[SUHVVO\ ZDLYHV DOO ULJKWV WR SRVVHVV WKH (TXLSPHQW DIWHU DQ (YHQW RI 'HIDXOW$OOUHPHGLHVDUHFXPXODWLYHDQGQRWDOWHUQDWLYHDQGQRH[HUFLVHE\33/7RIDUHPHG\ZLOOSURKLELWRUZDLYHWKH H[HUFLVHRIDQ\RWKHUUHPHG\&XVWRPHUVKDOOSD\DOOUHDVRQDEOHDWWRUQH\V¶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¶6$/7(5$7,212)7+((48,30(17,76)$,/85(72 0$,17$,1 7+( (48,30(17 ,76 )$,/85( 72 3523(5/< 683(59,6( (48,30(17 86( 25 ,76 )$,/85( 72 3529,'($1'0$,17$,1$335235,$7(7<3(6$1''(37+62)6$)(7<685)$&,1*%(1($7+$1'$5281' 7+( (48,30(17 ,1 $&&25'$1&( :,7+  33/7¶6 ,167$//$7,21 $1' 2:1(5¶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¶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±,1&/8'(6  $JH±3OD\%XLOGHUDQG.LG%XLOGHU3OD\6WUXFWXUH *DWRU:DONDQG6ROR6LW'RZQ6SLQQHUIRU$JHV 0D[3OD\6ZLQJ6HWZ%HOW7RWDQG$'$$FFHVVLEOH6HDW 5DIW0XOWL8VHU6ZLQJ 6WDQGQ6SLQ6SLQQHUIRU$JHV :REEOH6SKHUH6SLQQHUIRU$JHV 6KLSSLQJWR&KDQKDVVHQ 6XSHUYLVLRQRI,QVWDOODWLRQZLWK&LW\&UHZ 9ROXQWHHUV     6KLSSLQJ,QFOXGHG 7D[1RW,QFOXGHG 7RWDO  1RWH$ERYHSULFHVDUHIRUHTXLSPHQWDQGVXSHUYLVLRQRQO\$OOVLWHZRUNFRQFUHWHFXUELQJVLGHZDONVHQJLQHHUHGZRRG ILEHUUHVLOLHQWVXUIDFLQJHWF«LVE\RZQHU      3DJHRI  0DNH3XUFKDVH2UGHUV2XW7R  0DNH&KHFNV3D\DEOH7R 3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ,QF3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ,QF 5HPLW3XUFKDVH2UGHUV7R5HPLW&KHFNV7R 3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ,QF $WWHQWLRQ6DOHV$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (86+Z\ 0RQHWW0LVVRXUL86$  3OD\3RZHU/7)DUPLQJWRQ 32%R[ 'DOODV7;   127(  $SSOLFDEOHVDOHVWD[HVZLOOEHFRQILUPHGRQFHRUGHUDQGDQ\WD[FHUWLILFDWHVDUHUHFHLYHG ‚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³33/7´ 6DOHV5HSUHVHQWDWLYHLVQRWDXWKRUL]HGWRVLJQWKLV4XRWHRQEHKDOIRI33/7RU&XVWRPHUDQG VLJQHG4XRWHVFDQQRWEHDFFHSWHGIURP6DOHV5HSUHVHQWDWLYH7RVXEPLWWKLVRIIHUSOHDVHVLJQEHORZDQGIRUZDUGD FRPSOHWHVLJQHGFRS\RIWKLV4XRWHGLUHFWO\WR³33/76DOHV$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ´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¶VSURGXFWOLWHUDWXUHDQG WKHPRVWFXUUHQW&RQVXPHU3URGXFW6DIHW\&RPPLVVLRQ+DQGERRNIRU3XEOLF3OD\JURXQG6DIHW\   'HIDXOW 5HPHGLHV  'HOLQTXHQF\ &KDUJHV  &XVWRPHU¶V IDLOXUH WR SD\ DQ\ LQYRLFH ZKHQ GXH RU LWV IDLOXUH WR RWKHUZLVHFRPSO\ZLWKWKHWHUPVRIWKLV4XRWHVKDOOFRQVWLWXWHDGHIDXOWXQGHUDOOXQVDWLVILHGLQYRLFHV (YHQWRI'HIDXOW  8SRQDQ(YHQWRI'HIDXOW33/7VKDOOKDYHDOOUHPHGLHVDYDLODEOHWRLWDWODZRUHTXLW\LQFOXGLQJZLWKRXWOLPLWDWLRQDOO UHPHGLHVDIIRUGHGDVHFXUHGFUHGLWRUXQGHUWKH8QLIRUP&RPPHUFLDO&RGH&XVWRPHUDJUHHVWRDVVLVWDQGFRRSHUDWHZLWK 33/7WRDFFRPSOLVKLWVILOLQJDQGHQIRUFHPHQWRIPHFKDQLF¶VRURWKHUOLHQVZLWKUHVSHFWWRWKH(TXLSPHQWRULWVORFDWLRQRULWV UHSRVVHVVLRQ RI WKH (TXLSPHQW DQG &XVWRPHU H[SUHVVO\ ZDLYHV DOO ULJKWV WR SRVVHVV WKH (TXLSPHQW DIWHU DQ (YHQW RI 'HIDXOW$OOUHPHGLHVDUHFXPXODWLYHDQGQRWDOWHUQDWLYHDQGQRH[HUFLVHE\33/7RIDUHPHG\ZLOOSURKLELWRUZDLYHWKH H[HUFLVHRIDQ\RWKHUUHPHG\&XVWRPHUVKDOOSD\DOOUHDVRQDEOHDWWRUQH\V¶IHHVSOXVDQ\FRVWVRIFROOHFWLRQLQFXUUHGE\ 33/7LQHQIRUFLQJLWVULJKWVKHUHXQGHU6XEMHFWWRDQ\OLPLWDWLRQVXQGHUODZ&XVWRPHUVKDOOSD\WR33/7DVOLTXLGDWHG GDPDJHVDQGQRWDVDSHQDOW\DQDPRXQWHTXDOWRSHUPRQWKRIDQ\SD\PHQWWKDWLVGHOLQTXHQWLQVXFKPRQWKDQGLV QRWUHFHLYHGE\33/7ZLWKLQWHQ  GD\VDIWHUWKHGDWHRQZKLFKGXH   /LPLWDWLRQ RI :DUUDQW\ ,QGHPQLW\  33/7 0$.(6 12 (48,30(17 :$55$17,(6 (;&(37 )25 7+26( 67$1'$5' :$55$17,(6 ,668(' :,7+ 7+( (48,30(17 :+,&+ $5( ,1&25325$7(' +(5(,1 %< 7+,6 5()(5(1&(33/763(&,),&$//<',6&/$,06$1<,03/,(':$55$17<2)0(5&+$17$%,/,7<25),71(66 )25 $ 3$57,&8/$5 385326( $1' $1< /,$%,/,7< )25 ,1&,'(17$/ 25 &216(48(17,$/ '$0$*(6 &86720(5$*5((672'()(1',1'(01,)<$1'6$9(33/7+$50/(66)520$//&/$,062)$1<.,1')25 '$0$*(62)$1<.,1'$5,6,1*2872)&86720(5¶6$/7(5$7,212)7+((48,30(17,76)$,/85(72 0$,17$,1 7+( (48,30(17 ,76 )$,/85( 72 3523(5/< 683(59,6( (48,30(17 86( 25 ,76 )$,/85( 72 3529,'($1'0$,17$,1$335235,$7(7<3(6$1''(37+62)6$)(7<685)$&,1*%(1($7+$1'$5281' 7+( (48,30(17 ,1 $&&25'$1&( :,7+  33/7¶6 ,167$//$7,21 $1' 2:1(5¶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¶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apital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Todd Hoffman 2020 2024 thru Department Park & Trail Improvements Description Replace existing park equipment that has reached its useful life expectancy. 2020 - Curry Farms Park (basketball court & trail), Lake Ann Beach (playground), Powers Blvd (pipe rail fence), Power Hill Park (playground), Rice Marsh Lake Park (backstop and ballfield benches) and Meadow Green Park (backstop and ballfield Benches) 2021 - Carver Beach Park (playground), Lake Susan Park (basketball court), Pheasant Hills Park (playground), Roundhouse Park (structure) and Stone Creek Park (playground) 2022 - Bandimere Park (playground) and North Lotus Park (hockey rink) 2023 - Carver Beach Playground (playground), Sugarbush Park (playground) and South Lotus Lake Park (playground) 2024 - Lake Ann Park (playground), Meadow Green Park (playground) and Lake Ann Park (batting cages) Project #PK&T-141 Priority n/a Justification Existing playground equipment has reached its useful life expectancy of 25 years. Budget Impact/Other Useful LifeProject Name Park Equipment Replacement Category Park Type Equipment Account #2 Account #1 401-0000-4xxx Total Project Cost:$1,505,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Expenditures 1,260,000255,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 255,000Equipment 255,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 255,000 1,260,000Total Prior 245,000 Total Total2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Funding Sources 1,260,000255,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 255,000Park Replacement Fund 255,000 245,000 250,000 255,000 255,000 1,260,000Total Prior 245,000 Total CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Approve City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies and Guidance Response to COVID­19 Pandemic Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.10. Prepared By Todd Gerhardt, City Manager File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies (Forms 1 through 5) and Guidance Response to COVID­19 Pandemic.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND Families First Coronavirus Response Act­ NEW On March 18, 2020 the President signed into law the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. The Act includes the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act and the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act . This information is subject to change based on additional interpretative guidance provided and rapidly changes circumstances pertaining to COVID­19. Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act ­ Available 4/02/20 thru 12/31/20. Under the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act employees who have been employed with the City of Chanhassen at least 30 calendar days are eligible for up to 12 weeks of job­protected leave for Public Health Emergency Leave. A “public health emergency” is defined to mean “an emergency with respect to COVID­19 declared by a federal, state, or local authority.”  The act provides leave for employees who are unable to work (or telework), despite the City having work available for the employee, because they need to care for a son or daughter under 18 years of age whose: School or place of care has been closed, or Child care provider is unavailable due to a public health emergency. The first 10 days of emergency FMLA leave may be unpaid, unless the employee chooses to use available accrued paid leave or if the employee qualifies for and chooses to use Emergency Paid Sick Leave. After the first 10 days emergency FMLA leave will be paid at a rate of 2/3 the employee’s regular rate of pay for the number of hours the employee would otherwise normally be scheduled to work, capped at $200 per day ($10,000 aggregate) for the remaining duration of the leave. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectApprove City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies and Guidance Response to COVID­19PandemicSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: C.10.Prepared By Todd Gerhardt, City Manager File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the City of Chanhassen Temporary Policies (Forms 1 through 5) and GuidanceResponse to COVID­19 Pandemic.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDFamilies First Coronavirus Response Act­ NEWOn March 18, 2020 the President signed into law the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. The Act includesthe Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act and the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act .This information is subject to change based on additional interpretative guidance provided and rapidly changescircumstances pertaining to COVID­19.Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act ­ Available 4/02/20 thru 12/31/20.Under the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act employees who have been employed with the City ofChanhassen at least 30 calendar days are eligible for up to 12 weeks of job­protected leave for Public HealthEmergency Leave. A “public health emergency” is defined to mean “an emergency with respect to COVID­19declared by a federal, state, or local authority.” The act provides leave for employees who are unable to work (or telework), despite the City having work availablefor the employee, because they need to care for a son or daughter under 18 years of age whose:School or place of care has been closed, orChild care provider is unavailable due to a public health emergency.The first 10 days of emergency FMLA leave may be unpaid, unless the employee chooses to use available accruedpaid leave or if the employee qualifies for and chooses to use Emergency Paid Sick Leave.After the first 10 days emergency FMLA leave will be paid at a rate of 2/3 the employee’s regular rate of pay for the number of hours the employee would otherwise normally be scheduled to work, capped at $200 per day ($10,000 aggregate) for the remaining duration of the leave. ATTACHMENTS: Request for Emergency Paid Sick Leave Form 1 Designation Notice Form 2 Request for Public Health Emergency Paid Leave Form 3 Guidelines for Working at Home Form 4 Temporary Policies and Guidance Response to COVID­19 Pandemic Page 1 of 4 City of Chanhassen Request for Emergency Paid Sick Leave Form #1 For employees to request emergency paid sick leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) Effective April 7, 2020, if you are unable to work or telework, despite the city having work available for you, because of the COVID-19 pandemic, you may be eligible for paid sick leave under new federal legislation. Paid sick leave under the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act is in addition to other leave provided under Federal, State, or local law; an applicable collective bargaining agreement; or the city’s accrued leave benefits. This Emergency Paid Sick Leave benefit is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2020 under the FFCRA and is not eligible for pay out at termination of employment. You will be paid as noted below. Full-time employees may take a total of up to 80 hours of paid emergency sick leave for a qualifying reason. Part-time employees may take the number of hours they typically work in an average two-week period. To request paid emergency sick leave, please complete the information below. Employee Name: ____________________________________________________________________ I certify I am unable to work or telework at this time, despite the city having available work for me, due the following reason (check one of the applicable boxes): I am subject to a Federal, State or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19. I have attached to this form the name of the government entity that issued the quarantine or isolation order; and/or a copy of the quarantine or isolation order. I am requesting Emergency Paid Sick Leave at my regular rate of pay for two weeks, up to a cap of $511/day or $5,110 total over the entire two-week Emergency Paid Sick Leave period for the following dates: From (date): _________________________ to (date): _____________________ I have been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19. Name of Health Care Provider who advised me to self-quarantine for COVID-19 related reasons: ______________________________________________________________________ I am requesting Emergency Paid Sick Leave at my regular rate of pay for up to two weeks, up to a cap of $511/day or $5,110 total over the entire two-week Emergency Paid Sick Leave period for the following dates: From (date): _________________________ to (date): _____________________ Page 2 of 4 I am experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and am seeking a medical diagnosis Name of Health Care Provider I am contacting: ______________________________________________________________________ I am requesting Emergency Paid Sick Leave at my regular rate of pay for up to two weeks, up to a cap of $511/day or $5,110 total over the entire two-week Emergency Paid Sick Leave period for the following dates: From (date): _________________________ to (date): _____________________ I am caring for an individual who is subject to a Federal, State or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19; or who has been advised by a health care provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-19. Name of Individual: ______________________________________________________ *Relationship to Employee: ________________________________________________ *Must be an immediate family member, roommate, or a similar person with whom the employee has a relationship that creates an expectation that the employee would care for the person due to the quarantine. Please specify why employee is unable to work because of the reason for leave:_________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ I have attached to this form the name of the government entity that issued the quarantine or isolation order; and/or a copy of the quarantine or isolation order; or Name of Health Care Provider who advised identified individual to self-quarantine for COVID-19 related reasons: ______________________________________________________________________ I am requesting Emergency Paid Sick Leave at 2/3 my regular rate of pay for up to two weeks, up to a cap of $200/day or $2,000 total over the entire two-week Emergency Paid Sick Leave period for the following dates: From (date): _________________________ to (date): _____________________ I am caring for my minor child whose school or place of care is closed (or child- care provider is unavailable) to due to COVID-19 related reasons. Per Department of Labor April 1 Guidance, Emergency Paid Sick Leave is only for the period when the employee needs to, and actually is, caring for his or her child. By signing below, I certify no other suitable person is available to care for the child during the period of this requested leave. From (date): _________________________ to (date): _____________________ Page 3 of 4 Name of Child: __________________________ Age: ___________ Relationship to Employee: _______________________________________________________________ Name and City of School or Child Care Center/Provider the child is enrolled at:____________________________________________________________ Name of Child: ___________________________ Age: ___________ Relationship to Employee: _______________________________________________________________ Name and City of School or Child Care Center/Provider the child is enrolled at:____________________________________________________________ Name of Child: ____________________________ Age: ___________ Relationship to Employee: _______________________________________________________________ Name and City of School or Child Care Center/Provider the child is enrolled at:____________________________________________________________ I am requesting Emergency Paid Sick Leave at 2/3 my regular rate of pay for up to two weeks, up to a cap of $200/day or $2,000 total over the entire two-week Emergency Paid Sick Leave period for the following dates: From (date): _________________________ to (date): _____________________ I am experiencing a substantially similar condition, as specified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. I am requesting Emergency Paid Sick Leave at 2/3 my regular rate of pay for up to two weeks, up to a cap of $200/day or $2,000 total over the entire two-week Emergency Paid Sick Leave period for the following dates: From (date): _________________________ to (date): _____________________ I wish to use my accrued city leave balances to supplement any of the payments made to me at the 2/3 pay rate. Page 4 of 4 • I certify the above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. • I understand pursuant to federal regulations, payments made to employees taking paid leave pursuant to the FFCRA are not subject to the employer portion of the OASDI tax imposed by Section 3111(a) of the IRS Code, which is also known as the social security tax. __________________________________________________ _______________ Employee Signature Date g:\admin\jf\request-for-emergency-paid-sick-leave revised 04-10-2020.docx Page 1 of 2 City of Chanhassen Designation Notice for Public Health Emergency Leave Form #2 Employee Name: Date: If approved: We have reviewed your request for Public Health Emergency Leave under the Expanded FMLA provision of the Families First Coronavirus Response Ac (the “FFCRA”) along with any supporting documentation you have provided. Your Public Health Emergency Leave/FMLA Expansion request is approved. All leave taken because you are unable to work/telework, due to caring for your minor child whose school or chicdcare provided is closed or unavailable doe to the COVID-198 pandemic will be counted towards your 12 weeks of annual FMLA entitlement. This temporary leave benefit is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2020, pursuant to federal law. You are required to notify us as soon as possible as practicable if dates of scheduled leave change. Based on the information you have provided to date, we are providing the following information about the amount of time that will be counted against your annual leave entitlement. • Provided there is no deviation from your anticipated leave schedule, the following number of hours, day, or weeks will be counted against from your leave entitlement: The City of Chanhassen understands that this leave will be used intermittently, pursuant to the city and the employee’s approval • While on Public Health Emergency Leave, you are entitled to continued coverage under the city’s group health plan on the same terms as if you did not take leave. You will be responsible for paying your share of the premiums, applicable, timely. The city will charge your leave balances as follows, pursuant to your election form. • For your first two weeks of up to 12 weeks of Public Health Emergency Leave, the following will occur: Per your election, you will be unpaid leave for two weeks. Page 2 of 2 Per your election, your accrued leave balances through the city will be charged for those first two weeks (paid at your regular rate of pay)(vacation, comp time or PTO). Subject to approval of you Emergency Paid Sick Leave election form, your first two weeks will be paid at 2/3 your regular rate of pay through Emergency Paid Sick Leave. • For the remainder of your FMLA extension period (max 10 weeks), your leaves will be paid at 2/3 your regular rate of pay, subject to a max of $200 per day. You are eligible to supplement this 2/3 payment with 1/3 of your accrued city leave balances from vacation/PTO. The City of Chanhassen currently understands employers may permit, but cannot require, employees to supplement any 2/3 payment under Public Emergency Leave/FMLA expansion. If unapproved: Your Public Heal Emergency Leave request is Not Approved per the following reason: You have exhausted your FMLA leave entitlement in the applicable 12-month period. g:\admin\jf\covid-19\designation notice form 2.docx Page 1 of 3 City of Chanhassen Employee Request for Public Health Emergency Leave Form #3 For Employees to Request Public Health Emergency Leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”). Effective April 1, 2020, despite the city having work available for you, if you are unable to work, or telework because you are caring for your minor child whose school or child care provider is closed or unavailable due to the COVID-19 pandemic, you may be eligible for a partially paid leave of absence through the Public Health Emergency Leave. This expanded Family Medical Leave is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2020 under the FFCRA. If eligible, you may take up to 12 weeks of leave for this reason (providing you have not already exhausted the “traditional” FMLA you may be entitled to throughout the 12-month period). Pursuant to federal law, the first two weeks of leave are unpaid, but you may use your accrued vacation/PTO balances, accrued comp time, or Emergency Paid Sick Leave (should be eligible) during those initial two weeks. To be eligible for this expanded FMLA leave, you must: • Have worked for the city for at least 30 days (i.e., for an eligible employee requesting leave on April 1, the employee would have to be on the city’s payroll as of March 2, 2020); • Be unable to work or telework because you are caring for your minor child since your child’s school or daycare closed or your childcare is unavailable doe to the COVID-10; and • There is no other suitable person available to care for your child/children during the period of leave. Employee Name: I certify I am unable to work or telework at this time due to the need to care for my minor child/children who do not have school or child care due to the COVID-109 pandemic. This situation makes me: _____ Completely unable to work my normal schedule. Dates of leave requested: From (date): to (date): _____ Able to work only a portion of my normal schedule. (Please describe the hours you are able to work on a separate piece of paper and attach. This will be reviewed with your supervisor and a response provided as to whether the City can reasonably accommodate the requested schedule). Page 2 of 3 Child / Children I must care for: Child’s name: Age: Relationship to Employee: Name and City of School or Child Care Center/Provider the child is enrolled at: Child’s name: Age: Relationship to Employee: Name and City of School or Child Care Center/Provider the child is enrolled at: Child’s name: Age: Relationship to Employee: Name and City of School or Child Care Center/Provider the child is enrolled at: Please note: With the care of a child older than 14 during daylight hours, you must include a statement that special circumstances exist requiring the employee to provide care. • I certify that the above information is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge • I understand pursuant to federal regulations, payments made to employees taking paid leave pursuant to the FFCRA are not subject to the employer portion of the OASDI tax imposed by Section 3111(a) of the IRS Code, which is also known as the social security tax. • I further certify that no other suitable person is available to care for the child(ren) during this period of time. For my first two weeks of up to 12 weeks of Public Health Emergency Leave, I elect the following: Unpaid leave for two weeks Accrued leave through the city for two weeks (paid at my regular rate of pay) Providing I am eligible, two weeks of Emergency Paid Sick Leave, subject to approval of my completed request form, paid at 2/3 my regular rate of pay Page 3 of 3 I wish to use my accrued city leave balances to supplement any of the payments made to me at the 2/3 pay rate, so I may receive my typical paycheck. The City of Chanhassen may permit, but cannot require, employees to supplement any 2/3 payment under the Public Emergency Leave/FMLA expansion. Employee Signature Date NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES: • Employees qualifying for expanded FMLA leave due to school or child care closures will be paid for two-thirds of their normal wage for the work hours missed, up to a maximum of $200/day. • The maximum hours available for regular part-time employees will be determined by normally scheduled hours. For example, a part-time employee who is scheduled to work 25 hours per week would be eligible for two-thirds of their normal wage for those hours, up to a maximum of $200/day. • The maximum hours available for limited part-time, temp and seasonal employees will be determined by calculating the average hours worked over the last six months to calculate the average daily hours. • Prior to being eligible for this paid time-off benefit, employees must first take two weeks of time off to care for their child/children whose school or child care is closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This initial two weeks of time off shall be unpaid, in some cases paid through Emergency Paid Sick Leave, or paid through the use of some other form of employer provided accrued leave. • The use of FMLA leave for this purpose counts towards an employee’s total FMLA leave eligibility of 12 weeks per 12-month period. CITY OF CHANHASSEN GUIDELINES FOR WORKING AT HOME – FORM 4 1. Set work hours: 2. Set measurable performance goals and expectations along with at timeframe for each (i.e., response times, phone calls, emails, project goals, etc.): 3. Limit interruptions from family members/reduce distractions. How do you plan to accomplish this? 4. How are you going to keep your direct supervisor informed of your goals, work hours and productivity? What productivity measures are you going to use? Explain specific check-in times and days. 5. How are you going to be accessible? Include time and frequency of contact (in both directions from employee to direct supervisor and from direct supervisor to employee). 6. A weekly report must be submitted to your direct supervisor detailing accomplishments for the week. I hereby agree to all of these rules and guidelines: Employee Signature Department/Title Date Approved: Direct Supervisor Signature Department/Title Date *NOTE: The city retains the rights to modify this work-at-home arrangement at any time. g:\admin\tg\guidelines.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN TEMPORARY POLICIES AND GUIDANCE RESPONSE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC DATE: 3/16/20 UPDATED: 4/02/20 In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City of Chanhassen has prepared the following temporary policies to be implemented effective April 2, 2020. Families First Coronavirus Response Act- NEW On March 18, 2020 the President signed into law the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. The Act includes the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act and the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act. This information is subject to change based on additional interpretative guidance provided and rapidly changes circumstances pertaining to COVID-19. Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act- Available 4/02/20 thru 12/31/20. Under the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act employees who have been employed with the City of Chanhassen at least 30 calendar days are eligible for up to 12 weeks of job-protected leave for Public Health Emergency Leave. A “public health emergency” is defined to mean “an emergency with respect to COVID-19 declared by a federal, state, or local authority.” The act provides leave for employees who are unable to work (or telework), despite the City having work available for the employee, because they need to care for a son or daughter under 18 years of age whose: • School or place of care has been closed, or • Child care provider is unavailable due to a public health emergency. The first 10 days of emergency FMLA leave may be unpaid, unless the employee chooses to use available accrued paid leave or if the employee qualifies for and chooses to use Emergency Paid Sick Leave. After the first 10 days emergency FMLA leave will be paid at a rate of 2/3 the employee’s regular rate of pay for the number of hours the employee would otherwise normally be scheduled to work, capped at $200 per day ($10,000 aggregate) for the remaining duration of the leave. Emergency Paid Sick Leave- Available 4/02/20 thru 12/31/20 Under the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act, up to 80 hours of paid emergency sick leave is available to all City of Chanhassen part-time and full-time employees who are unable to work due to a need for leave, despite the City having work available for the employee, because: 1. The employee is subject to a federal, state, or local quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19 2. The employee has been advised by a healthcare provider to self-quarantine due to concerns related to COVID-10; 3. The employee is experiencing the symptoms of coronavirus and seeking a medical diagnosis from a health care provider; 4. The employee is caring for an individual who is subject to an order as described in (1) above, or caring for an individual directed as described in (2) above; 5. The employee is caring for their son or daughter whose school or place of care has been closed or whose school or place of care or child care provider is unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19; or for a child whose school has closed or whose child care provider is unavailable due to the coronavirus. 6. The employee is experiencing any other substantially similar condition as specified by federal authorities. Full-time employees who are unable to work because of reasons 1-3 listed above are entitled to up to two weeks (80 hours) of paid sick leave paid at their regular rate of pay. Part-time employees who are unable to work because of reasons 1-3 listed above are entitled to this paid sick leave paid at their regular rate of pay on a pro-rated basis equal to the typical number of hours that they would have been scheduled to work in a two-week period. The amount of paid sick time for reasons 1-3 listed above is capped at $511 per day ($5,110 in the aggregate) for personal sick leave. Full-time employees who are unable to work because of reasons 4-6 listed above are entitled up to two weeks (80 hours) of paid sick leave paid at 2/3 their normal rate of pay. Part-time employees who are unable to work because of reasons 4-6 listed above are entitled to this paid sick leave paid at 2/3 their normal rate of pay on a pro-rated basis equal to the typical number of hours that they would have been scheduled to work in a two-week period. The amount of paid sick time for reasons 4-6 listed above is capped at $200 per day ($2,000 in the aggregate) and. Employees may elect to substitute accrued paid time for any unpaid time during this period. Any unused paid leave granted by the act will be forfeited on December 31, 2020 and does not carry over into 2021. g:\admin\jf\covid-19 temporary policies and guidance.docx CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Approve Amendment to Option Agreement ­ 195 West 79th Street Section OLD BUSINESS Item No: E.1. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director File No:  PROPOSED MOTION The City Council approves an amendment to the Option Agreement for three months to September 10, 2020. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Matthew Rosati signed a Purchase Agreement to buy the city­owned property at 195 West 79th Street. His intent is to develop a brewery. The Purchase Agreement stated that he must close on the property on June 10, 2020. In order to close on the property he was required to submit a site plan. Mr. Rosati has submitted a letter requesting additional time to close on the property. While he has done a lot of work to develop the site plan, he feels Covid­19 has changed everything. Attached is a letter from Mr. Rosati detailing the work he has done and the financial assistance he has garnered. Staff is recommending that a three­month extension to September 9, 2020 be granted. The remainder of the Purchase Agreement would remain the same. ATTACHMENTS: Extension Request Letter Purchase Agreement Amendment to Option Agreement 1798 Marigold Court, Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 239-6419 www.Chanhassenbrewing.com Chanhassen Brewing Company Matthew Rosati 1798 Marigold Court Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 March 27, 2020 The Honorable Mayor Ryan 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 5517 Dear Mayor Ryan, Council Members, and City Manager Garhardt, I am writing to ask for an extension on the purchase agreement for the property of 195 West 79th Street, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 and to add an option for a developer buy the real estate. I believe having a brewery in the City of Chanhassen would be a valuable addition to the city and would undoubtably enhance the community. Unfortunately, the unforeseen circumstances of Covid-19, has changed the world. Everything has been placed on hold, changed, or abandoned. Over the last 9 months, I have been extremely dedicated to making Chanhassen Brewing Company become a reality, having personally invested over $60,000. Therefore, I am asking for an extension on the purchase agreement for the property. After working with professionals in the community, I have found out the development of land itself is going to be a challenge. I have completed a building design, engineering design, equipment design, Phase 1, and Wetland delineation, so I have a strong idea of what I am getting into. I am currently in the process of completing a full traffic study and I’m getting an approved design from the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District. Chanhassen Brewing Company has not only made a significant amount of progress on the land in the last 12 months but we completed a logo, website, social media with over 1600 followers, merchandise, marketing that placed a sign on the land and graphics on my personal vehicle, business plan, financial structure, an investment opportunity through MNvest that has currently raised $230,000.00 with 40 investors. December of 2019, my general contractor provided me with a comprehensive breakdown of the construction budget. Along with SAC/WAC fees, city fees, a full traffic study, and additional cost for development and requirements needed to be fully approved, I determined that finding a developer to buy the land and build the building, would be best course of action. Having a developer finish the development of the property 1798 Marigold Court, Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 239-6419 www.Chanhassenbrewing.com would allow me to focus on the business and allow me to lower my minimum investment required to $200,000.00. There would be a built-in buy out option for the property at the 5-year mark allowing me to have full control of the business and property. This would give me much needed leeway to build the business over 5 years without the constraints of massive loans. As of March 1st 2020, I had three developers engaged in developing the real estate, a draft of a lower minimum offering for investors (which is already met), a sit plan that would have been submitted to the city by March, 27, 2020, and a large personal finical contribution. On March 9th 2020 my plans were changed. Covid-19 has changed the course of everything, that includes the developers, banks, venders being used to complete tasks like the traffic study or obtaining a variance from the state. Everything has been put on hold for an undetermined amount of time. I am going to continue to work with developers, banks and venders to ensure that Chanhassen Brewing Company will become a reality. I know once the pandemic settles, the economy will need a boost. Chanhassen Brewing Company will not only produce jobs during construction, it will also maintain jobs during operation and it will be an added feature to the City of Chanhassen that will bring people into the city. I want to thank you for the consideration and for all the time and hard work needed to support the city during these uncertain times. Thank you, Matthew Rosati OPTION AGREEI\TENT THIS OPTION AGREE MENT ((Agreement"), effective as of the $Y+aday of&"<-2019, is by and between CITY OF CHANEASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Seller"), and FRONTIER LAIID EOLDINGS, LLC, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Purchaser"). Recitds A. Seller is the owner ofthe real property located in the City of Chanhassen, legally described as follows: ("Property''). B. Seller hereby grants to Purchaser the option to acquire the Property (..Option',) on or before June 10, 2020 subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW TEEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreemernr herein contained and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged. the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Option. ln consideration of One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) ("Option Price") and other good and valuable consideration, Seller hereby grants to Purchaser for the period ("Option Period") beginning with the effective date of this Agreement ("Commencement Date") and ending at 1l:59 p.m. on June 10, 2020 ("Expiration Date"), unless the Expiration Date is extended pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the exclusive right and privilege to acquire the Property at a pric€ of $460,000.00 and according to and subject to the terms of this Agreernent and the Option Property Purchase Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof ("Purchase Agreemenf'). The Option Price paid as part of this Agreernent is non-refundable, except that the Option Price shall be applied to the amount due under the Purchase Agreernent upon closing of the Property. a. During the term of this Option Period, Seller warrants and rqrresents it will not enter into any other agreements or contracts related to the sale of the Property, or which would encumber, alter, or prevent Seller from complying with the terrns of this Agreement or the Purchase Ageement, without first obtaining written approval from Purchaser. 2. Conditions to Exercise of Ootion. conditions, prior to exercising the Option: I202337v4 Purchaser must meet the following Lot 2, Block I, Gatewry East 2od Addition, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof; Obtain Site Plan Approval from the City of Chanhassen for the proposed development on the Property ("Development"); Provide a letter of permanent financing for the cost of development of the Property pursuant to the approved Site Plan from a financial institution in a forrn approved by Seller. 3. Notice of Exercise. If Purchaser elects to exercise the Option granted in this Agreement, Purchaser must deliver to Seller a written notice of Purchaser's intention to exercise the Option, together with two (2) copies ofthe Purchase Agreement executed by Purchaser. The notice of Purchaser to exercise the Option and the executed copies of the Purchase Agreement must be delivered to Seller either personally or by certified mail, return receip requested, by depositing the same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, and the mailed acceptance must bear a postmark with any time prior to 1 l:59 p.m. on the Expiration Date ("Purchaser's Notice"). The mailed Purchaser's Notice shall be addressed to Seller at the address set forth in the Purchase Agreement or such other address as may be designated by Seller upon written notice to Purchaser from time to time. Upon receipt of the Purchaser's Notice and provided the conditions under Paragraph 2 have been met, Seller agrees to immediately execute the Purchase Agreement and promptly retum a signed copy to Purchaser, either personally or by certified mail in the manner described above, addressed to Purchaser at its address set forth in the Purchase Agreement or such other address as may be desigrated by Purchaser from time to time to Seller by written notice. 4. Failure to Exercise Option. If the Purchaser fails to exercise Purchaser's Option, this Agreement shall expire by its terms and the Purchaser will execute and deliver a Quit Claim Deed to the Property in recordable form to Seller within ten (10) business days after the expiration ofthe Expiration Date. 5. Insoection and Testins. Purchaser and/or its agents may enter onto the Property for the purpose of conducting any studies and investigations of the Property which Purchaser deems appropriate. The studies and investigations may include, without limitation, physically inspecting the Property and reviewing Seller's records conceming the Property, which records shall be made reasonably available to Purchaser. Purchaser will promptly pay any and all charges for any studies and investigations and agrees to defend, indemnit/ and hold Seller harmless from any loss or damage incurred by or any claims against Seller arising from Purchaser's inspection of the Property. Following the completion of such studies and investigations, Purchaser, at its expense, will promptly rcstorc the Property to the condition it was in prior to entering upon the Property. Purchaser will provide Seller with copies of all written reports resulting from such studies and investigations. 6. Assisrment. assigning party. This Agreement shall not be assigned without approval of the non- [Remainder ofpage intentionally lef blank] [Signature pages to follow] b 2202331v4 IN WII{ESS WEEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. SELLER: CITY OF CHANEASSEN And: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager J20233'1v4 PURCHASER: FRONTIER LAND HOLDINGS, LLC By: ?.Its:€siJeerf 4202337v4 EXHIBIT A OPTION PURCHASE AGREEMENT 5202337v4 EXHIBIT "A" TIIIS OPTION PROPERTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT ("Agreement'), effective as of the 39f^day of 20_, is by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Purchaser"), and FRONTIER LAND EOLDINGS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Seller"). A. as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Gateway East 2nd Addition, Carver Couner, Minnesota, xgsqlding to the recorded plat thereof; ('?roperty''). B. Seller and Purchaser entered into an Option Agreement dated June 2019 ("Option Ageement") for the purchase of the Property and Purchaser is exercising the Option granted by Seller to purchase the Property according to the terms set forth in the Option Agreernent by delivering this Agreernent as provided in the Option Agre€rnent to Seller. C. Seller hereby agrees to sell and Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase the Property, subject to and upon the terms hereinafter sa forth. NOW TIIEREFOR-E, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: Price and Terms. The purchase price shall be Four Hundred Sixty Thousand and No/100 Dollars $460,000.00 ("Purchase Price"), which Purchaser shall pay in cash on the Closing Date. The Purchase Price shall be reduced at Closing by the Option Price under the Option Agreement. Except for reduction in the Purchase Price, the Option Price is non- refundable. 2. Convevance and Title. Subject to performance by the Purchaser, Seller agrees to execute and deliver a recordable Warranty Deed conveying marketable title to the Property, subject only to the following exceptions: Building and zoning laws, ordinances and state and federal regulations Reservation of mineral rights by the State of Minnesota. 1. a b 202338v4 OPTION PROPERTY PURCHASE AGREEMENT Recitals Seller is the owner of the real located in the City of Chanhassen, legally described I Applicable laws, regulations, zoning regulations and ordinances, whether federal, state or local; and Easements that do not interfere with Purchaser's intended improvements and use; Encroachments identified on any survey of the Property that do not interfere with Purchaser's intended improvernents and use; (hereinaft er *Permitted Encumbrances,). 3. Closine. The closing under the terms of this Agreernent will take place within twenty (20) days following the Purchaser's Notice as set forth in the option Agreement, or on such earlier date as Seller and Purchaser may agree in writing or as otherwise extended pursuant to the terms of this Agreement ("Closing Date') at a place mutually agreed upon by the parties. 4.Real Estate Taxes. A. Prior Yean'Delinquent Real E te Taxes and Del Special Assessments. Delinquant real estate taxes payable in years prior to the year of Closing and delinquent installments of special assessments €rtifid for collection with real estate taxes payable in years prior to the year of Closing, together with penalty, interest and costs, shall be paid by Seller not later than the Date of Closing. B. Real Estate Taxes t'a vable in the Year of C oslnp-Real estate taxes payable in the year of Closing shall be prorated betrveen Seller and Purchaser on a calendar year basis to the Date ofClosing. eal Estate Tax Seller shall pay on Date of Closing any deferred real estate taxes (including "Green Acres" taxes und€r Minn. Stat. $ 273.111) for the Property, payment of which is required as a result ofthe Closing of this sale and the recording of the Deed. Provision for payment shall be by payment into escrow of I .5 times the estimated payoff amount ofthe defemed taxes. Certified Special Assessments. All installments of special assessments certified for payment with the real estate taxes payable in the year of Closing shall be paid by Seller at Closing. Purchaser will assume installments of special assessments not paid at closing. E. Pendins Soesi al Assessments Seller shall provide for payment of special assessments pending as of the Date of Purchaser's Notice for improvements that have been ordered by the City Council or other govemmental authorities. c. d D 2202338v4 C. 5. Closing Date. Possession. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to Purchaser on the 6. Representations bv Seller. Seller represents and warrants to Purchaser: Seller is the fee owner of the Property and is authorized to convey title to Purchaser. a. Seller is not a foreign person as defined in Section 12145(f)(3) of the Intemal Revenue Code or regulations issued thereunder. Seller has good, marketable, insurable title to the Property, free and clear ofall liens, encumbrances, claims and charges. As of the Date of Closing there will be no outstanding or unpaid claims, actions or causes of action related to any fansaction or obligation entered into or incurred by Seller with respect to the Property; The City has no actual knowledge of an "individual sewage treatrnent system" (as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 115.55, subd. 1(g)) located on the Property. The City has no actual knowledge of any leases, oral or written, affecting the Property nor any other right, title or interest in or to the Property granted to any third party The City certifies that, as of the date hereot no methamphetamine production has occurred on the Property, pursuant to Minn. Stat. g 1s2.027s. Seller represents that Seller does not know if there are historical, Native American, or archeological materials on or in the Property that might be protected by law. Seller does not know ofany wells on the Property. J Seller has no knowledge of the storage or burying of hazardous waste on the Property. All representations and warranties shall survive Closing for a period ofrwo (2) years. 7. Title Examination. Seller, at its expense, shall within ten (10) days of Purchaser exercising its right to purchase the Property under this Agreernent, fumish a title insurance commitrnent in the full amount of the purchase price issued by a Land Title ("Title Company''), certified to date to include proper searches covering bankruptcies, state and federal judgrnents b c. d. e. f. h 3202338v4 I and liens, by which said company commits to issue its policy of title insurance that insures that at closing Purchaser shall have good, marketable and insuable title of record to the property, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, leases, claims and charges (except permitted encumbrances) C'Commitmenf). Purchaser shall be allowed ten (10) business days after receipt of the Commitrnent referred to above to examine the title and make any objections thereto, which shall be made in writing or deerned waived. If any objection is so made, Seller shall have tsn (10) business days from receipt of Purchaser's written title objections to notiff Purchaser of the Seller's intention to make title marketable within one hundred twenty (120) days from Seller's receipt of such written objections. If notice is given, payments hereunder required shall be postponed pending correction of title, but upon correction of title within ten (10) days after written notice to Purchaser, the parties shall perform its obligations under this Agreement according to its terms. If no such notice is given, or if notice is given but title is not corrected within the time provided for, this Agreement shall be null and void, at the option of Purchaser, and in such case, neither party shall be liable for damages hereunder. 8. Condition of Propertv. EXCEPT AS DQRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE SELLER IS NOT MAKING AND HAS NOT MADE, AT ANY TIME, ANY WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LMMED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS AS TO HABITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE (OTHER THAN THE SELLER'S WARRANTY OF TITLE TO BE SET FORTH IN THE DEED), ZONING, TAX CONSEQI]ENCES, LATENT OR PATENT P}IYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, I.]-[ILITIES, ACCESS, OPERATING HISTORY OR PROJECTIONS, VALUTION, GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS, THE COMPLIANCE OF THE PROPERry WITI{ GOVERNMENTAL LAWS, THE TRUTH, ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY PROPERTY DATA OR OTHER INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE PROPERry DELTVERED TO PURCHASER BY THE SELLER OR ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING REGARDING THE PROPERry. PURCHASER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT UPON THE CLOSING OF THE TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, THE SELLER SHALL SELL AND PURCHASER SHALL ACCEPT THE PROPERry "AS IS, WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS". PURCHASER HAS NOT RELIED AND WILL NOT RELY ON, AND THE SELLER IS NOT LIABLE FOR OR BOI.]ND BY, ANY DGRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, GUARANTIES, STATEMENTS, REPRESENTATIONS, OR INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE PROPERTY OR RELATING THERETO MADE OR FURNISHED BY THE SELLER OR AGENT REPRESENTING OR PURPORTING TO REPRESENT THE SELLER, TO WHOMEVER MADE OR GTVEN, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ORALLY OR IN WRITING, LNLESS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT. THE PURCHASER REPRESENTS TO THE SELLER THAT PURCHASER HAS CONDUCTED, OR WILL HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONDUCT PRIOR TO CLOSING, SUCH INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE PHYSICAL, E}.IVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL 4202338v4 CONDITIONS THEREOF, AS PURCHASER DEEMS NECESSARY TO SATISFY ITSELF OF THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERry AND THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OR CURATIVE ACTION TO BE TAKEN WITH RESPECT TO ANY HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC SUBSTANCES OR MATERIALS ON, WITHIN, UNDER OR DISCHARGED FROM THE PROPERTY, AND WILL RELY SOLELY UPON SAME AND NOT UPON AI.TY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE SELLER. UPON CLOSING, PURCHASER SHALL ASSLME THE RISK THAT ADVERSE MATTERS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADVERSE P}IYSICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS MAY HAVE BEEN REVEALED BY PURCHASER'S INVESTIGATIONS, AND PURCHASER, UPON CLOSING, SHALL BE DEEMED TO HAVE WATVED, RELINQUISHED AND RELEASED THE SELLER (AND THE SELLER'S OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS) FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, CAUSES OF ACTION (INCLUDING CAUSES OF ACTION IN TORT) LOSSES, DAMAGES, LIABILITIES, COSTS AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COURT COSTS) OF ANY AND EVERY KIND OR CHARACTER, KNOWN OR UNKNOWN, WHICH PURCHASER MIGHT HAVE ASSERTED OR ALLEGED AGAINST THE SELLER (AND THE SELLER'S OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, SHAREHOLDER, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS) AT ANY TIME BY REASON OF OR ARISING OUT OF AIVY LATENT OR PATENT PHYSICAL CONDITIONS, VIOLATIONS OF A}.IY APPLICABLE LAWS) AND ANY AND ALL OTHER ACTS, OMISSIONS, EVENTS, CIRCI]MSTANCES OR MATTERS REGARDING THE PROPERry. The Seller and Purchaser agree that the provisions of this Paragraph 8 shall survive the closing of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 9. No Guarantv of Development Purchaser acknowledges and understands that nothing in this Agreement shall be mnstrued as an approval by the City of Chanhassen of any plat or development plan for the Property which may come before the City of Chanhassen either now or in the future. 10. following: Closinq Documents. At cl osing, Seller shall execute and deliver to Purchaser the Warranty Deed. Warranty Deed. Non-Foreip Person Certification. A certification in form and content satisfactory to the parties hereto and their counsel, properly executed by Seller, containing such information as shall be required by the lntemal Revenue Code, and the regulations issued thereundff, in order to establish that Seller are not "foreign persons" as defined in gl,M5(f)(3) of such Code and such regulations. Seller's Affidavit. A standard form affidavit by Seller indicating that on the Closing Date there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgnents, tax liens a b 5202338v4 or bankruptcies against or involving Seller or the Property; that there has been no skill, labor or material fumished to the Property for which payment has not been made or for which mechanic's liens could be filed; and that there are no other unrecorded interests in the Property. Septic Disclosure Ststement, if applicable Well Disclosure Statement, if applicable. Certification. A certification that the representations and/or warranties made by Seller are materially the same as were in existence on the date of this Agreernent or noting any changes thereto. Other Documents. All other documents reasonably detemrined by either party or the title insurance company to be necessary to transfer and provide title insurance for the Property. I 1. Closins Costs. The costs relating to this fi"nsaction shall be paid as follows: a.Seller shall pay in connection with the closing hereunder: b. Purchaser shall pay in connection with the closing hereunder: t. ii. iii. iv. i. ii. iii. iv. State deed tax. Conservation fee attributable to Warranty Deed. One-half (l/2) of the closing fee. Issuance of the Commitrnent Pro-rated utilities. One-half (l/2) ofthe closing fee. All recording fees. Prernium for owner's title insurance policy. A1l brokerage fees, if any. Pro-rated utilities. c.All costs incidental to the Closing not otherwise specifically allocated under this Agreernent shall be allocated in accordance with the custom and practice for similar transactions in Minnesota. 12. Purchaser's Continsencies. Purchaser's obligations under this Agreement are contingent upon Purchaser's satisfaction with each of the following ("Purchaser's Contingencies') : The representations of Seller set forth in this Agreement must be true as of the date of this Agreement and on the Closing Date, and Seller shall have delivered to Purchaser at Closing a certificate dated the Closing Date, 6202338v4 a. d. e. f. signed by Seller, certifying that such representations are true as of the Closing Date. Purchaser determining on or before the Closing Date that it is satisfied, in its sole discretion, with the results of matters disclosed by a Phase I Environmental Audit or by any additional environmentaVengineering investigation or testing of the Property performed by Purchaser or Purchaser's agent. If the Purchaser is not satisfied with the physical condition of the Property, Purchaser may terminate this Agreernent by written notice to Seller. If no such notice terminating this Agreement is delivered, this contingency shall be deemed waived by the Purchaser. By executing this Agreement, Seller hereby authorizes Purchaser, its contractors, agents and employees to enter upon the Property at reasonable times to conduct the investigations and,/or tests described herein. Purchaser shall be solely responsible for all environmental tests and shall hold Seller harmless from any such costs and shall indemnit, Seller for breach of this provision including reasonable attomeys' fees. Purchaser determining that it is satisfied with an ALTA survey of the Property provided by the Seller. If each of the Purchaser's Contingencies has not been satisfied on or before the Closing Date or such earlier date as provided hereinabove for the Contingency, then Purchaser may terminate this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statute Section 559.21 . The contingencies set forth in this section are for the sole and exclusive benefit of Purchaser, and Purchaser shall have the right to waive the contingencies by giving notice to Seller. 13. Defau]t. A. Default by Purchaser. If Purchaser defaults under this Agreerrent in any material respect or breaches any obligation, covenanl or agreement contained herein, Seller shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving a 30-day written notice to Purchaser pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 559.21, as it may be amended for time to time. If Purchaser fails to cure such default within thirty (30) days of the date of such notice, Seller's sole remedy shall be to terminate this Agreernent and any amounts paid by Purchaser pursuant to the Option Agreement shall be forfeited to Seller. B. Default by Seller. If Seller defaults under this Agreernent in any material respect or breaches any obligation, covenant or agreement contained herein in any material respect, Purchaser, as Purchaser's sole and exclusive rernedy shall be to terminate this Agreement. 14. Notices. All notices, demands and requests which may be given or which are required to be given by one party to the other shall be in writing, sent by United States Mail, postage prepaid, certified with return receipt requested as follows: C 7202338v4 b. If to Seller: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: City Manager With copy to: Andrea McDowell Poehler Campbell Knutson, P. A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 If to Purchaser: Frontier Land Holdings, LLC 1798 Marigold Court Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attrr: Matthew Rosati With a copy to: Matt Greenstein Greenstein Sellers PLLC 825 Nicolla Mall, Suite 1648 Minneapoli s, Minnesota 55402 15. Captions. The paragraph headings or captions appearing in this Agreement are for convenience only, are not a part of this Agreernent and are not to be considered in interpreting this Agreement. 16. Assisnment This Agreement shall not be assigned without appoval of the non- assiping party. 17. Agreement. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for all provisions of this Purchase 18. No Broker Commissions. Each party represents and warrants to the other party that there is no broker involved in this transaction with whom the warranting party has negotiated or to whom the warranting party has agreed to pay a broker commission. Each party agrees to indemniff the other party for any and all claims for brokerage commissions or finder' s fees in connection with negotiations for the purchase and sale of the Property arising out of any alleged agreernent or commitment or negotiation by the indenurifoing party. 8202338v4 20. Bindine Effect. This Agreement binds and benefits the parties and its representatives, successors and assigns. 21. RelationshipBetween Seller and Purchaser. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating a joint venture between the Seller and Purchaser or any relationship other than that of the Seller and Purchaser. 22. Governins Law. This Agreement has been ent€red into in the State of Minnesota and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws ofthe State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WEEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. SELLER: CITY OF CHANHASSEN ise Ryan, And Todd Gerhardt, City Manager PURCIIASER: FRONTIER LAND HOLDINGS, LLC By: Its:cEidenl By: 9202338v4 19. Entire Aereement: Modification. This Agreernent constitutes the complete agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior oral or written agreernents between the parties regarding the Property. There are no verbal agreernents that change this Agreement and no waiver ofany of its terms will be effective unless in a writing executed by all parties. w 209710v1 1 AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO OPTION AGREEMENT (“Amendment”), effective as of the 13th day of April, 2020, is by and between CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Seller"), and FRONTIER LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Purchaser"). Recitals A. Seller and Purchaser executed an Option Agreement dated June 24, 2019. B. Seller and Purchaser desire to amend the Option Agreement as herein provided. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 1 of the Option Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 1. Grant of Option. In consideration of One Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) (“Option Price”) and other good and valuable consideration, Seller hereby grants to Purchaser for the period (“Option Period”) beginning with the effective date of this Agreement (“Commencement Date”) and ending at 11:59 p.m. on September 10, 2020 (“Expiration Date”), unless the Expiration Date is extended pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the exclusive right and privilege to acquire the Property at a price of $460,000.00 and according to and subject to the terms of this Agreement and the Option Property Purchase Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof (“Purchase Agreement”). The Option Price paid as part of this Agreement is non-refundable, except that the Option Price shall be applied to the amount due under the Purchase Agreement upon closing of the Property. a. During the term of this Option Period, Seller warrants and represents it will not enter into any other agreements or contracts related to the sale of the Property, or which would encumber, alter, or prevent Seller from complying with the terms of this Agreement or the Purchase Agreement, without first obtaining written approval from Purchaser. 2. Except as herein provided, all provisions, terms and conditions of the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] [Signature pages to follow] 209710v1 2 209710v1 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. SELLER: CITY OF CHANHASSEN By:____________________________ Elise Ryan, Mayor And:___________________________ Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 209710v1 4 PURCHASER: FRONTIER LAND HOLDINGS, LLC By:____________________________ Its:____________________________ 209710v1 5 EXHIBIT A OPTION PURCHASE AGREEMENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020­XX: Authorize Refund of a Portion of On­Sale Liquor License Fees; Approve 2020 Liquor License Renewals Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: F.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ADM­026 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution authorizing a refund of a portion of on­sale liquor license fees; and approves the 2020 liquor license renewals as listed on the attached sheet contingent upon receipt of all necessary documentation and satisfactory background investigations of new operating managers.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Refund Portion of On­Sale Liquor License Fees In response to the COVID­19 pandemic, the State of Minnesota ordered all bars and restaurants to close as gathering places as of March 17, 2020.  Recognizing the financial impact these closures have on local bars and restaurants, the city would like to issue on­sale liquor license refunds on a daily pro rata basis to be determined by the length of the government­mandated closures. If the closures end up being 60 days, the total estimated financial impact to the city would be approximately $15,000.  The refund amount for on­sale intoxicating liquor licenses for a 60­day period would be between $1,000­$2,000.  The refund amount for on­sale beer and wine liquor licenses for a 60­day period would be $68. Liquor License Renewals Attached is a listing of all of the liquor licenses that are renewed annually by the City Council.  This renewal is for the licensing period of May 1, 2020 through April 30, 2021.  As of this writing, staff has not received all of the necessary documentation from every license holder; however, this is typical and no license will be issued until all documentation is complete. The Carver County Sheriff’s Department is in the process of completing background investigations on any new operating managers of each establishment.  This includes criminal history, outstanding warrants, and driving records.  If any noteworthy issues are found, the individual license will not be issued and will be brought back to the council at a future meeting. Staff also reviewed property tax and utility bill records for each applicant and found that all licensees are current. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: Authorize Refund of a Portion of On­Sale Liquor License Fees; Approve2020 Liquor License RenewalsSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: F.1.Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ADM­026PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution authorizing a refund of a portion of on­sale liquor license fees; and approvesthe 2020 liquor license renewals as listed on the attached sheet contingent upon receipt of all necessarydocumentation and satisfactory background investigations of new operating managers.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYRefund Portion of On­Sale Liquor License FeesIn response to the COVID­19 pandemic, the State of Minnesota ordered all bars and restaurants to close as gatheringplaces as of March 17, 2020.  Recognizing the financial impact these closures have on local bars and restaurants, thecity would like to issue on­sale liquor license refunds on a daily pro rata basis to be determined by the length of thegovernment­mandated closures.If the closures end up being 60 days, the total estimated financial impact to the city would be approximately $15,000. The refund amount for on­sale intoxicating liquor licenses for a 60­day period would be between $1,000­$2,000. The refund amount for on­sale beer and wine liquor licenses for a 60­day period would be $68.Liquor License RenewalsAttached is a listing of all of the liquor licenses that are renewed annually by the City Council.  This renewal is for thelicensing period of May 1, 2020 through April 30, 2021.  As of this writing, staff has not received all of the necessarydocumentation from every license holder; however, this is typical and no license will be issued until all documentation iscomplete.The Carver County Sheriff’s Department is in the process of completing background investigations on any newoperating managers of each establishment.  This includes criminal history, outstanding warrants, and driving records.  Ifany noteworthy issues are found, the individual license will not be issued and will be brought back to the council at afuture meeting. Staff also reviewed property tax and utility bill records for each applicant and found that all licensees are current. License Updates New North Coop (2401 Highway 7) opened in 2019 (On­Sale) Idly Dosai International Food Market (406 West 78th Street) opened in 2019 (3.2 Off­Sale) Board & Brush Creative Studio (7882 Market Blvd.) opened in 2019 (Beer & Wine) Tequila Butcher (590 West 79th Street­former Applebee's site) opened in 2019 (On­Sale) Closed/Not Renewing Smashburger (7905 Great Plains Blvd. #130) closed in 2019 (Beer & Wine) Chipotle Mexican Grill (560 West 79th Street) is not renewing their liquor license in 2020 (On­Sale) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing a refund of a portion of on­sale liquor license fees; and approve the 2020 liquor license renewals as listed on the attached sheet, contingent upon receipt of all necessary paperwork and a satisfactory background investigation.  Following council approval, the licenses will be forwarded to the Liquor Control Division at the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for final processing. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2020 Liquor License Renewal List CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 13, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REFUND OF A PORTION OF ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FEES WHEREAS, In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 17, 2020 the State of Minnesota ordered all bars and restaurants to close as gathering places; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen realizes the financial impact these closures have on local bars and restaurants; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen currently has issued 20 on-sale liquor licenses to local bars and restaurants; and WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen would like to issue refunds to these bars in restaurants on a daily pro rata basis to be determined by the length of the government-mandated closures. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, that the City authorizes issuing refunds of a portion of on-sale liquor license fees on a daily pro rata basis to be determined by the length of the government-mandated closure. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 2020 Liquor License Renewal Applications Lic. No.FEE OFF-SALE INTOXICATING LICENSES 2020-01 Lunds & Byerlys Wine & Spirits, 780 West 78th Street $200 2020-02 MGM Wine & Spirits, 7856 Market Boulevard $200 2020-03 Target Store T-0862, 851 West 78th Street $200 2020-04 Top Ten Liquors, 19900 West 78th Street (Hennepin County)$200 2020-05 Total Wine & More, 510 Lake Drive $200 2020-06 The Vintage, 8971 Crossroads Boulevard Suite 160 $200 ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES (All fees listed include $200 Sunday Sales fee, except High Timber Lounge) 2020-07 American Legion Post 580, 290 Lake Drive East $9,809 2020-08 Axel’s, 560 West 78th Street $6,315 2020-09 Buffalo Wild Wings, 550 West 79th Street $9,809 2020-10 Chanhassen Dinner Theatres, 501 West 78th Street $13,304 2020-11 High Timbers Lounge & Meeting Rooms, 591 West 78th Street (no Sunday Sales)$7,862 2020-12 Houlihan’s, 530 Pond Promenade $9,809 2020-13 North Coop, 2401 Highway 7 $9,809 2020-14 Rey Azteca, 7874 Market Boulevard $6,315 2020-15 Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street $9,809 OFF-SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSES 2020-16 Cub Foods, 7900 Market Boulevard $58 2020-17 Idly Dosai International Market & Food Service, 406 West 78th Street $58 2020-18 Kwik-Trip #402, 2201 West 78th Street $58 2020-19 Kwik-Trip #492, 8921 Crossroads Boulevard $58 2020-20 Speedway #4095, 2960 82nd Street $58 ON-SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSE NONE ON-SALE BEER & WINE LICENSES 2020-21 Bluff Creek Golf Course, 1025 Creekwood Drive $410 2020-22 Board & Brush Creative Studio, 7882 Market Boulevard $410 2020-23 Bonsai Sushi & Korean Cuisine, 420 Pond Promenade $410 2020-24 Café Thyme, 7850 Market Boulevard $410 2020-25 Davanni's Pizza and Hot Hoagies, 464 Lake Drive, Suite 100 $410 2020-26 Halla Greens Executive Golf Course & Driving Range, 495 Pioneer Trail $410 2020-27 Kai's Sushi & Grill, 586 West 78th Street $410 2020-28 Life Time Fitness, 2901 Corporate Place $410 2020-29 Na’s Thai Cafe, 566 West 78th Street $410 2020-30 Soya Sushi & Grill, 530 West 79th Street, Suite 120 $410 TOTAL FEES $88,431 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Approve a Request to Rezone Property Located North of West 78th Street and West of Lake Ann Park from Rural Residential District (RR) to High Density Residential District (R­16), Lot Consolidation and Site Plan Review with Variances for the Construction of a 48­Unit Continuing Care Retirement Facility Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: F.2. Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2020­02 PROPOSED MOTION The Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance rezoning property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R­16), lot consolidation and approves a resolution for site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48­unit continuing care retirement facility (The Moments of Chanhassen), as shown in plans dated January 6, 2020, revised February 18, 2020, subject to the conditions of approval; and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The attached staff report has been edited since the Planning Commission meeting. Revised plans were submitted to meet issues raised by the Planning Commission and address some of staff's conditions of approval. Rezoning of property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R­16), lot consolidation and site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48­unit continuing care retirement facility. BACKGROUND The site was formerly occupied by Natural Green, a landscape contractor business. In 1989, the business moved and the site was restored. With the upgrade of TH 5 and the frontage road, the excess right­of­way was acquired by Southwest Transit as a potential Park and Ride. The Land Use Plan designates the site as Residential High Density (net density 8­16 units/acre). This category has been established to accommodate high­density residential development.  A continuing care retirement facility is a permitted use in a High Density Residential District. DISCUSSION On February 4, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved this request with a vote of 3­2. All CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectApprove a Request to Rezone Property Located North of West 78th Street and West of LakeAnn Park from Rural Residential District (RR) to High Density Residential District (R­16), LotConsolidation and Site Plan Review with Variances for the Construction of a 48­Unit ContinuingCare Retirement FacilitySectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: F.2.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 2020­02PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance rezoning property from Rural Residential District to HighDensity Residential District (R­16), lot consolidation and approves a resolution for site plan review with variances forthe construction of a 48­unit continuing care retirement facility (The Moments of Chanhassen), as shown in plansdated January 6, 2020, revised February 18, 2020, subject to the conditions of approval; and adopts the Findings ofFact and Recommendation.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe attached staff report has been edited since the Planning Commission meeting. Revised planswere submitted to meet issues raised by the Planning Commission and address some of staff'sconditions of approval.Rezoning of property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R­16), lot consolidation andsite plan review with variances for the construction of a 48­unit continuing care retirement facility.BACKGROUNDThe site was formerly occupied by Natural Green, a landscape contractor business. In 1989, the business moved andthe site was restored. With the upgrade of TH 5 and the frontage road, the excess right­of­way was acquired bySouthwest Transit as a potential Park and Ride.The Land Use Plan designates the site as Residential High Density (net density 8­16 units/acre). This category has beenestablished to accommodate high­density residential development.  A continuing care retirement facility is a permitted usein a High Density Residential District.DISCUSSION On February 4, 2020, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved this request with a vote of 3­2. All commissioners acknowledged that the design of the building was attractive. Issues of concern dealt with the wetland and parking setback variances. Staff explained that the intent of the ordinance was being met as follows: The wetland buffer was increased in some areas to make up for the requested reduction. This practice will protect the integrity of the wetland which is the purpose of the ordinance. The parking lot setback is intended to promote the screening. The applicant is providing a landscape buffer that screens the vehicular area. The intent of the ordinance is being met. Over the years, there have been numerous attempts to develop this site.  The property has multiple constraints including slopes, wetlands, shoreland overlay regulations, and challenging access.  A memory care facility appears to be the most suitable use for the site because it has reduced trips, less parking requirements and less hard surface (no tenant drivers). The applicant has demonstrated they can and are actively working to address all the issues in the staff report and those raised by the Planning Commission.  The Planning Commission meeting minutes dated February 4, 2020 are attached to the staff report. RECOMMENDATION The Chanhassen City Council approves the rezoning of property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R­16), lot consolidation and site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48­unit continuing care retirement facility (The Moments of Chanhassen), as shown in plans dated January 6, 2020, revised February 18, 2020, subject to the conditions of approval; and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Recommendation Application Narrative Plans Rezoning Ordinance Variance Resolution Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing E­mail from Kari Barker and Reply From Jill Sinclair 60­Day Extension E­mail from CenturyLink Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated February 4, 2020 CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: February 4, 2020 CC DATE: April 13, 2020 REVIEW DEADLINE: Waived CASE #: 2020-02 BY: SJ, ET, EH, JS This staff report has been edited since the Planning Commission meeting. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Rezoning of Property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R-16), lot consolidation and site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48-unit continuing care retirement facility. LOCATION: North of West 78th Street and west of Lake Ann Park APPLICANT: Civil Site Group PROPERTY OWNER: TMSC of Chanhassen LLC Patrick Sarver Elizabeth Wright 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 16258 Kenyon Avenue St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Lakeville, MN 55044 psaver@civilsitegroup.com elizabeth@themoments.com 612-615-0060 952-915-1515 PRESENT ZONING: Rural Residential District, RR 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential High Density (8 -16 units/net acre) ACREAGE: 3.5 acres gross, 3.16 acres net DENSITY: 15.1 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings because the city is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. An amendment must be consistent with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the city must then approve the site plan. This is a quasi-judicial decision. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance rezoning property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R-16), lot consolidation and approves a resolution for site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48-unit continuing care retirement facility (The Moments of Chanhassen), as shown in plans dated February 18, 2020, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and decision.” Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 2 of 19 The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinances for variances. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of the public hearing at the Planning Commission was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 20, Article II, Division 2, Amendments Chapter 20, Article II, Division 6, Site Plan Review Chapter 20, Article XXIII, Division 9, Design Standards for Multi-Family Developments Chapter 20, Article XXIII. General Supplemental Regulations. Sec. 20-903. - Zoning lots PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The request consists of multiple applications to facilitate the construction of a continuing care retirement facility (The Moments of Chanhassen). The request includes a rezoning from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District, site plan approval with variances for the construction of a continuing care retirement facility. The site is located north of West 78th Street and west of Lake Ann Park. Access to the site will be gained off of West 78th Street. The site is zoned Rural Residential District. SUBJECT PROPERTY Highway 5 W. 78th Street Lake Ann Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 3 of 19 The following is a summary of the requests: 1. Rezoning The first request is to rezone the property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District. This request is consistent with the Land Use Plan. 2. Site Plan with Variances The request is for a site plan to construct a 65,000 square-foot continuing care retirement facility. The total permitted site coverage is 35 percent. The proposed development has a total hard coverage area of 34.5%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high-quality materials. They include limestone at the entry and the main body of the building. Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS) is used as an accent material. All elevations that can be viewed by the public have received equal attention. Parking is buffered from views by landscaping. Access to the site is provided via West 78th Street. The site contains multiple wetlands, a creek and is within the shoreland overlay district. The applicant is requesting a five-foot wetland setback variance and a front yard setback variance. Staff is recommending a minimum 5-foot wetland setback and approval of the front yard setback variance. The site is comprised of two parcels. Staff is recommending the parcels be consolidated into a single zoning lot. This will be a condition of approval of the site plan. Staff regards the project as a well-designed development. The overall design is sensitive to the surrounding area. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the rezoning, site plan and variances with conditions as outlined in the staff report. BACKGROUND The site was formerly occupied by Natural Green, a Landscape Contractor Business. In 1989, the business moved and the site was restored. With the upgrade of TH 5 and the frontage road, the excess right-of-way was acquired by Southwest Transit as a potential Park and Ride. The Land Use Plan designates the site as Residential High Density (Net density 8-16 Units/Acre). These categories have been established to accommodate either high-density residential development. A continuing care retirement facility is a permitted use in a High Density Residential District. Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 4 of 19 REZONING The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from Rural Residential to High Density Residential District. The area to the north and west contains a single-family home and is guided Residential High Density. Lake Ann Park is located east of the subject site and is guided Parks and Open Space. West 78th Street is located south of the subject site. NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST DEVELOPMENT Single Family W. 78th Street Lake Ann Park Single Family LAND USE Residential High Density Residential High Density Parks and Open Space Residential High Density ZONING Rural Residential District Rural Residential District Rural Residential District Rural Residential District The 2030 Land Use Plan shows this area designated for development as High Density Residential, net density of 8 - 16 units per acre. Appropriate zoning for this land use is R-12, R-16, RLM, or Subject Site Subject Site Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 5 of 19 PUD-R. The use consists of a single building with 48 individual rooms. The occupants of the building will be individuals that need assistance with their mobility and will not put the same level of demand on the infrastructure that a typical high density development would. This area is in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Staff is recommending that this area be rezoned to R-16 and finds that the rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Senior Housing Demand in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Since 2014, this city has added 111 continuing care or service enriched dwelling units. (Riley Crossings and Beehive/Trouvaille Homes. SITE PLAN This building must comply with the design standards for the multi-family district and the standards set in the continuing care retirement facility. The City Code requires the development to have an attractive design and use durable materials. Site coverage may not exceed 35 percent. The total hard surface coverage proposed on the site is 34.5%. The design of the building is attractive and is proposed to be constructed of high-quality materials. They include limestone for the main body of the building and EIFS as an accent material. All elevations have received equal attention. Parking is buffered from views by landscaping. The majority of the parking is underground. The trash enclosure for the building is located inside the building. The added landscaping will provide a calming effect to a busy area. Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 6 of 19 The site plan request is for a 65,000 square- foot continuing care retirement facility. The building has a pronounced entrance, utilizes durable exterior materials, and exhibits articulation. The north elevation contains a patio area. The roofline is staggered, well-articulated and enhances the design of the building. The applicant is requesting two variances pertaining to setbacks. The first variance is a parking setback variance. The City Code requires a 25-foot setback. The applicant is requesting to reduce the setback to 10 feet. The parking is adequately screened from views off of West 78th street. Staff is recommending approval of the parking setback variance. The applicant is also requesting a 5-foot wetland setback variance. In return, the applicant is providing a wider buffer in other areas around the wetlands. Staff worked closely with Watershed District staff on this issue and is recommending the applicant maintain a minimum 5-foot setback from the edge of the buffer. Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 7 of 19 Sec. 20-965. - Continuing Care Retirement Facility The following applies to continuing care retirement facilities: 1. The facility shall maintain state licensing. 2. The facility shall conform to the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Codes and Fire Codes. 3. The facility shall be connected to municipal services. 4. The facility shall be of residential style and character with a maximum structure height of 35 feet. 5. Parking areas shall be screened from public or private right-of-way and adjacent single- family residential areas. 6. One-third parking space per bed shall be provided with an additional parking space for every employee on the largest single shift. 7. The facility shall be located in a medium or high-density district with a gross density not exceeding 16 beds per acre. Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 8 of 19 8. Access to the site shall be from a collector or arterial street as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The site will be licensed and conform to the requirements of the Minnesota State Building and Fire Codes. The site will be connected to municipal services. The building has a residential appearance to it. It maintains a one-story appearance and most of the parking is located underground. The building has a capacity of 48 individuals and 25 employees on the major shift. This will translate to 41 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 27 surface parking spaces and 17 underground parking spaces for a total of 44 spaces. The access to the site will be via West 78th Street which is classified as a collector Street. LIGHTING/SIGNAGE The applicant failed to submit a lighting plan. The applicant must prepare a lighting plan and include photometrics. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The applicant has not submitted a light fixture design. This fixture must be downcast and the light cut off at a 90- degree angle. The City Code requires all fixtures be shielded. The signs for this project include: One monument sign is proposed to be located along West 78th Street. The size of the sign may not exceed 24 square feet nor be higher than five feet. The sign shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. The sign must comply with the sign ordinance. The logo may not exceed 30% of the sign area. The letters shall be backlit and use individual dimension letters, at least one-half inch deep. The sign materials are compatible with the building. The applicant must apply for a sign permit. PARKING The ordinance requires one-third parking space per bed with an additional parking space for every employee on the largest single shift. The building has a capacity for 48 individuals which translates to 16 parking spaces. The major shift will have 25 employees. The total number of parking spaces required is 41. The applicant is providing 44 parking spaces. ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE Size, Portion and Placement Entries: The building has a pronounced entrance. Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 9 of 19 Articulation: The building incorporates adequate detail and has been tasteful designed. The architectural style is unique to the buildings but will fit in with the surrounding area. The building will provide a variation in style through the use of limestone and EIFS. The building utilizes exterior materials that are durable and of high quality. Signs: All signage must meet the sign ordinance. Material and Detail High quality materials are being used on the building. Color The colors chosen for the building are earth tones. The selection is unique but blends in with the surrounding buildings. Height and Roof Design The maximum building height permitted is three stories. The building meets the ordinance requirement. The roofline is staggered, adding articulation to the design of the buildings. The ordinance requires a pitched element on building. Multiple pitched elements are used to break the expanse of the pitched roof to comply with this requirement. All rooftop equipment must be screened from views. Facade Transparency All facades viewed by the public contain more than 50 percent windows and/or doors. Loading Areas, Refuse Areas, Etc. The trash enclosure is located inside the building. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure. SITE PLAN FINDINGS In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: 1. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; 2. Consistency with this division; Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 10 of 19 3. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas; 4. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; 5. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. 6. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the city's design requirements, the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning ordinance if the setback variances are approved, the design standards, and the site plan review requirements. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the area. Staff regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the city’s image. Based upon the foregoing, staff is recommending approval of the site plan with conditions outlined in the staff report. ACCESS The development fronts on West 78th Street near the intersection of Audubon Road and TH 5 and proposes one access driveway on the far west side of the site. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) was provided plans for review due to the proximity of TH 5 and had no comments or subsequent conditions based on the provided plans. Twenty-three parking stalls are distributed near the west side of the building and an additional seventeen parking stalls are Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 11 of 19 located underground. A turn-around, as required by Sec. 20-1122.4.h due to access being had from a collector street, has been integrated near the parking stalls to the west of the building. A turning movement analysis utilizing the largest anticipated design vehicle (at a minimum the largest Chanhassen Fire Department truck) shall be provided to ensure there is adequate spacing with no conflicts within the turnaround, the driveway entrance/exit, and with the traffic control devices located on West 78th Street (raised median, pavement striping, etc.). The applicant has been working with staff to ensure appropriate geometrics will be incorporated into the design. EASEMENTS The existing condition survey, which was completed in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, did not find any existing easements on the subject properties. However, the provided existing condition survey did not survey the entire limits of proposed construction. The applicant is proposing construction south of the property within right-of-way (city and MnDOT) for sanitary sewer service, discussed later in this report under “Utilities”. The applicant will be required to update the existing condition survey to incorporate the full extent of the proposed construction limits. The applicant is currently working on expanding the survey to the required limits. GRADING The applicant is proposing to grade the site to accommodate the construction of a 48-unit (65,000 gross square feet) senior care building, which includes underground parking. Through the proposed grading plan, drainage will be routed away from the building into a series of catch basins, stormwater pipe and an underground infiltration basin located in the drive and parking areas, and then directed to a filtration basin on the eastern portion of the development or the public system located on West 78th Street. Due to the constraints of the site, the applicant is proposing to grade within a wetland buffer area. The initial landscaping plan did not indicate any restoration of the disturbed area. Per City Code, restoration with native plant species is required for any disturbed areas within a wetland buffer during construction. The applicant submitted revised plans, received February 18, 2020, that account for restoration of this area meeting City Code, and the location of the required wetland buffer monumentation. Lastly, the grading plan must indicate the location of stockpiles and provide haul routes for any required fill/excavation, which may be submitted by the contractor once a contractor is procured. WETLANDS A Notice of Decision of the wetland boundary and type was approved on July 19, 2019. The wetland delineation indicates the wetland is 0.0073 acres of a Type 1/2, located adjacent to Riley Creek. While there is no direct impact to the wetlands on-site, the applicant is proposing to encroach into the proposed wetland buffer area during construction activities, as discussed previously under “Grading”. Additionally, the applicant is requesting wetland buffer averaging and a reduction in wetland buffer setbacks due to site conditions and constraints, such as: dynamic topography, wetland location in relation to site boundaries, and adjacent street frontage treatments. While staff generally agrees that the site has inherent constraints due to the location of the wetland and the proposed structure and property lines, the applicant’s original proposal Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 12 of 19 was to have a minimum buffering average width of twenty 20 feet coupled with a zero-foot setback at one location and less than five feet at another. While staff believes a 20-foot minimum buffer with averaging is acceptable, the approval of the buffering average must also be reviewed and approved by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD). The setback is solely regulated by the city and City Code under Sec. 20-411. The minimum setback requirement for a principal structure from the buffer edge is 30 feet for wetlands classified as Manage 1/2. This setback is necessary to maintain an area to allow property/building owners to maintain the primary structure and its surroundings while not encroaching nor disturbing the wetland buffer area. A zero-foot setback would not allow for such maintenance, promoting encroachment into the buffer area, and should not be approved. Due to the constraints of the site, staff recommended a minimum five-foot setback be adhered to at all times along the wetland buffer, and plans be resubmitted illustrating conformance with this condition for review and approval by the city prior to recording of the Site Plan Agreement. The applicant has provided updated plans, received on February 18, 2020, that illustrate adherence to the recommendations above, where a minimum five-foot setback (greater than five foot as currently proposed) is maintained at all times, see image below. RETAINING WALLS A total of five retaining walls are proposed with the development. One retaining wall, extending from the northwest corner of the building, appears to be over four feet in height. While top-of- wall and bottom-of-wall elevations were not provided on the initial submittal, based on proposed topographic grade line elevations it appears the retaining wall will reach a maximum height of Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 13 of 19 approximately nine feet. Bottom wall elevations and top of wall elevations for the entire wall section for all five retaining walls were provided on updated plans, received February 18, 2020, illustrating the proposed height of the retaining walls. As some of the retaining walls are over four feet in height, and in accordance with Sec. 20-1025 of City Code, all proposed walls exceeding four feet in height shall be designed by a registered engineer, and plans shall be submitted for review and approval prior to the commencement of any grading activities. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). All erosion control shall be installed and inspected prior to initiation of site grading activities. The applicant has submitted an erosion control plan and a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), however revisions and updates to the plans and SWPPP are required in order to meet the requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit and Sec. 19-145 of City Code. A more detailed redline of the SWPPP and erosion control plan will be provided to the applicant during construction plan review. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” These standards include abstraction of 1.0 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project and water quality treatment resulting in the removal of 90% total suspended solids (TSS) and 60% total phosphorous (TP). The applicant’s initial stormwater management proposal met the standards set forth in Chapter 19 for TSS and TP removals, but not abstraction. Upon review of resubmitted plans and working with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD), the applicant has met the requirement for abstraction as well. The applicant submitted a preliminary Stormwater Management Report (SMR) produced by Matthew R. Pavek, P.E. (MN No. 44263) with Civil Site Group. The applicant proposed treatment of stormwater runoff with the use of a filtration basin located on the east side of the development. Based on the information and analysis provided regarding treatment of stormwater for TS and TPP, the filtration method proposed was be sufficient to meet the quality requirements of the city. Furthermore, rate controls have been shown to reduce post- construction flows from pre-existing flows, meeting City Code. However, insufficient abstraction was provided on the initial submittal. Previously, 0.19 inches of runoff from the new impervious surfaces was being proposed for abstraction, while city standards is to capture 1.0 inch and the more restrictive rule of the RPBCWD is 1.1 inches. The applicant has conducted soil borings and analysis identifying “Type D” soils (slow draining, “tight” soils with an infiltration rate of 0.06 in./hr.), which could qualify the project site to be “restricted” through RPBCWD rules, lowering the required abstraction to 0.55 inches. Regardless, the proposed design for abstraction (0.19 inch) did not meet the rules and requirements of the city or Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 14 of 19 RPBCWD. The applicant revised their approach and updated the plans to account for the full abstraction amount via the use of an underground Tire Derived Aggregate (TDA) infiltration basin located under the parking area adjacent to the proposed structure. This approach can be recommended when sites are constrained and is a recognized BMP for stormwater management. Lastly, the applicant shall provide an operation and maintenance plan (O&M) for the private stormwater BMPs. The O&M of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity and must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, to be recorded against the benefiting properties. UTILITIES Water service is available off West 78th Street via a 12-inch DIP water main. The applicant initially proposed to wet tap two services for the building at the public water main: a 4-inch domestic service and a 6-inch fire service. This approach is not approved as only one service is needed to adequately serve the development. In response, the applicant revised the plans, received February 18, 2020, and now proposes one wet tap location for one dual combined domestic and fire service line. The applicant had also proposed a gate valve near the property line within the north boulevard adjacent to the public trail which was removed with the newly proposed water service design. The city’s sanitary sewer network is not available near the subject property, however the “Chanhassen Interceptor” sanitary main owned and operated by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) is directly adjacent to the property. The applicant is proposing to connect a private lateral directly to the MCES interceptor via a manhole located in MnDOT right-of-way. This method and approach has been submitted to the MCES for review and has been approved, pending further comments and conditions from the MCES. The proposal shows a directional bore of a 6-inch PVC sanitary sewer lateral through the development, across city right-of-way (W est 78th Street) south, and into the MCES manhole located in MnDOT right-of- way. The applicant will be required to apply for MnDOT right-of-way permits along with entering into a maintenance agreement with the city for the proposed inside drop within the MCES’ manhole. All proposed sanitary sewer lines will be privately owned and maintained. As such, no manholes shall be located within public right-of-way. PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW Preliminary construction plan redlines will be provided to the applicant within ten (10) days, or a reasonable time thereafter, of the Planning Commission hearing date in order to assist and aid the developer, their engineers and their designers in addressing the comments provided within this report. Any recommendation of approvals does not constitute final approval of details, including but not limited to alignments, materials and points of access, connection or discharge, that are depicted or suggested in the application and/or subsequent plans. The applicant is required to submit detailed construction drawings and/or plat drawings for the project, as applicable. The City of Chanhassen Engineering and Public Works Departments will review plans, in detail, when they are submitted and approve, reject or require modifications to the plans or drawings Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 15 of 19 based upon conformance with city Standards, the Chanhassen Code of Ordinances and the professional engineering judgment of the City Engineer. LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION Minimum requirements for landscaping at the proposed development include 1,404 sq. ft. of landscaped area around the parking lot, two landscaped islands or peninsulas, and five trees for the parking lot. The applicant’s proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table: Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 1,472 sq. ft. >1,472 sq. ft. Trees/parking lot 5 trees 5 trees Islands or peninsulas/parking lot 2 islands/peninsulas 2 islands/peninsulas The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping. Buffer yard and boulevard tree requirements: Required Plantings Proposed Plantings Buffer yard A – East prop. line, 140’ 1 Overstory trees 2 Understory trees 2 Shrubs 4 Overstory trees 7 Understory trees 12 Shrubs Buffer yard B – South prop. line, 360’ 7 Overstory trees 14 Understory trees 21 Shrubs 7 Overstory trees 14 Understory trees 22 Shrubs Buffer yard A – West prop. line, 235’ 1 Overstory trees 4 Understory trees 4 Shrubs 7 Overstory trees 12 Understory trees 21 Shrubs Buffer yard A – North prop. line, 390’ 3 Overstory trees 3 Understory trees 7 Shrubs Existing native vegetation, 50’-100’ in depth Boulevard trees, West 78th St., 1 tree per 30’ 15 trees 11 trees The applicant meets all minimum requirements for buffer yards. The quantity of boulevard trees is short, but with the combined planting space with the buffer yard, staff does not recommend increasing the planting quantities and finds the proposed landscaping acceptable. Shown on the removals plan is approximately eight trees along the west property line scheduled for preservation. Staff inspected the trees and while they are of the age and type of species that would tolerate construction activity, staff doesn’t recommend their preservation. The applicant has planned buffer yard plantings in the same location. The existing trees, mainly boxelder and ash, may be removed. Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 16 of 19 COMPLIANCE TABLE *A reduced parking setback requires a variance. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the variance. **A reduced wetland setback variance is being requested. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the wetland setback variance. VARIANCE FINDINGS Variance Sec. 20-58. - General conditions for granting. A variance may be granted if all of the following criteria are met: 1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Lot Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Area 129,600 square feet 155,132 square feet Lot Coverage 35% 34.5% Building Height Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Principal 35’ 29’ Building Setbacks Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Front yard 50’ 62’ Rear yard 50’ + wetland setback of 30’ 65’ + 5 feet** Side yard 50’ 50’ /115.5’ Parking Setback Ordinance Requirements Subject Site All Yards 25’ 25 sides and 10’ Front* Parking Requirements Ordinance Requirements Subject Site Stalls ⅓ space per bed + 1 space per employee on major shift which translates to 16 + 25 = 41 44 spaces Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 17 of 19 3. That the purpose of the variance is not based upon economic considerations alone. 4. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. 5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 6. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. Finding: Staff has been working with the applicant and the watershed district to find a reasonable solution to developing this site. It contains multiple wetlands and Riley Creek is located along the northern edge of the site. A reasonable solution was to average the buffer around the wetlands and reduce the setback in return. Staff is recommending a minimum 5-foot wetland setback and approval of the Watershed District. The parking setback required by ordinance is 25 feet. The intent is to screen the parking lot. The applicant is providing adequate screening that will accomplish the intent of the ordinance. Staff is recommending approval of the parking setback variance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the following three motions: 1. REZONING “The City Council approves an Ordinance for Planning Case #2020-02 to rezone 3.5 acres of property zoned RR, Rural Residential District, to R-16, High-Density Residential District, and adoption of the Findings of Fact.” 2. SITE PLAN APPROVAL “The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution for site plan consisting of a 65,000 square- foot continuing care facility with wetland and front yard setback variances, Planning Case #2020-20, for The Moments of Chanhassen as shown in plans dated January 6, 2020, revised February 18, 2020, and including the attached Findings of Fact and decision, subject to the following conditions: Engineering 1. A turning movement analysis utilizing the largest anticipated design vehicle shall be provided to ensure there is adequate spacing and no conflicts within the required turnaround, the driveway entrance/exit, and with the traffic control devices located on West 78th Street (raised median, pavement striping, etc.) prior to the issuance of building permits. Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 18 of 19 2. An updated existing condition survey shall be submitted with revised plans that include the full extents of the construction limits for review and approval by the city prior to recording of the Site Plan Agreement. 3. A minimum five-foot setback shall be adhered to at all times along the wetland buffer. 4. Revisions and updates to the erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be submitted to meet the requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit and Sec. 19-145 of City Code prior to the commencement of grading activities. 5. The applicant shall submit updated plans and modeling to provide for the required abstraction and obtain a RPBCWD permit prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The applicant shall provide an operation and maintenance plan (O&M) for the private stormwater BMPs. The O&M of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity and must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, to be recorded against the benefiting properties, prior to building permits being issued. 7. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure and submit proof that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, RPBCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, etc.). 8. The applicant will be required to enter into a maintenance agreement with the city for the proposed inside drop within the MCES’ manhole prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All proposed sanitary sewer lines will be privately owned and maintained, thus no manholes shall be located within public right-of-way. Environmental Resources 1. The applicant shall remove the existing trees within the grading limits along the west property line. Fire Marshal 1. Show any lower level exit doors and egress paths outdoors away from the building. This type of development cannot omit lower level exit doors. Planning 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. The applicant must prepare a lighting plan and include photometrics. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The applicant has not submitted a light fixture design. Chanhassen City Council The Moments of Chanhassen April 13, 2020 Page 19 of 19 This fixture must be downcast and the light cut off at a 90-degree angle. The City Code requires all fixtures be shielded. 3. Approval of the site plan applications is contingent upon approval of the rezoning and variances. 4. The monument sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area nor be higher than five feet. The sign shall be located 10 feet from the property line. A sign permit is required before construction of the sign. 5. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 6. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure as the trash. 7. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon consolidation of the two parcels into a single zoning lot.” ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2. Application and Narrative 3. Plans dated January 6, 2020, revised February 18, 2020 4. Rezoning Ordinance 5. Variance Resolution 6. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing 7. E-mail from Kari Barker and reply from Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resource Specialist 8. 60-day Extension 9. E-mail from CenturyLink dated January 8, 2020 10. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated February 4, 2020 g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-02 moments of chanhassen\staff report edited for cc.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES,MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Civil Site Group—Planning Case No. 2020-02, The Moments of Chanhassen. Request for Rezoning of 3.5 acres of property zoned RR, Rural Residential District,to R-16 High Density Residential and Site Plan approval with variances for the construction of a Continuing Care Retirement Facility located north of West 78th Street and West of Lake Ann Park. On February 4,2020,the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Civil Site Group for a Continuing Care Retirement Facility.The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed development preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned RR. Rural Residential District. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Residential—High Density. 3. The legal description of the property is described in the attached Exhibit A. 4. Rezoning Findings: The Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider six (6)possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment. The six(6)effects and our findings regarding them are: a. The proposed zoning has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official city's Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed zoning is or will be compatible with the present and future land uses of the area. c. The proposed zoning conforms with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. d. The proposed zoning will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed zoning can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the city's service capacity. 1 f. Traffic generation by the proposed use within the zoning district is within capabilities of streets serving the property. 5. In evaluating a site plan and building plan, the city shall consider the development's compliance with the following: a. Consistency with the elements and objectives of the city's development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted. b. Consistency with this division. c. Preservation of the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing areas. d. Creation of a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development. e. Creation of functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: 1. An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community. 2. The amount and location of open space and landscaping. 3. Materials,textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses. 4. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number of access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. f. Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. 6. Variance Findings: Sec. 20-58. -General conditions for granting. A variance may be granted if all of the following criteria are met: 1. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this chapter and when the variances are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties", as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 3. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. 4. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. 5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. 6. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in M.S. § 216C.06, subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. Finding: The proposed development is consistent with the city's design requirements, the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning ordinance, the design standards, and the site plan review requirements. Staff is recommending approval of the request with conditions. The site design is compatible with the surrounding developments. It is functional and harmonious with the area. The Planning Commission regards the project as a reasonable use of the land. The overall design is sensitive to the city's image. 7. The planning report#2020-02 dated February 4, 2020, prepared by Sharmeen Al-Jaff et al, is incorporated herein. 3 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed development including a Rezoning of 3.5 acres of property zoned RR, Rural Residential District to R-16 High Density Residential, and Site Plan Approval with Variances for the construction of a Continuing Care Retirement Facility. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 4th day of February, 2020. CHANHASS P ;NNING •MMISSION BY: Al • Arlik teven eick, Cha i an 4 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED That part of Tracts A and B below: Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distance 195.0 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence west along said south line a distance of 361.00 feet; thence northerly parallel to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 593.20 feet;thence deflecting right at an angle of 62 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 150 feet, more or less,to the center line of creek; thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with a line drawn northerly and parallel with said east line from point of beginning; thence southerly along said parallel line to the point of beginning. Tract B: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County. Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distance 195.0 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence northerly parallel with the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to its intersection with the centerline of the creek; thence easterly along said centerline of the creek to its intersection with the east line said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence southerly along said east line to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence west along said south line to the point of beginning; which lies northerly of the northerly boundary of Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-09 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for said county. 5 4931 West 35th Street • Suite 200 • St. Louis Park • Minnesota •55416 • www.civilsitegroup.com Matt Pavek, PE • 763-213-3944 Patrick Sarver, PLA • 952-250-2003 Memorandum TO: Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner City of Chanhassen FROM: Patrick Sarver, PLA. Civil Site Group DATE: 01/28/2020 RE: Moments of Chanhassen, Chanhassen, MN We are requesting Municipal approvals to construct the Moments of Chanhassen. This one-story, 48 unit, 65,000 GSF building, includes a lower level resident amenity space, look-out units, storage and underground parking. Due to the existing site conditions & constraints, including dynamic topography, wetland location, and adjacent street frontage treatments, a traditional parking and building location, orientation, and setbacks have proven excessively difficult to achieve without drastically degrading the services and amenities required for this type of site use. Therefore, we are requesting flexibility in both the parking setback requirement and a reduction in setback along the smaller wooded wetland, through the use of wetland averaging. Given the unique shape and location of the wetland we are proposing significant increase in setback from the wetlands and natural features on both the eastern and western ends of the site to counterbalance the reduction in setbacks at the center of the site. We are proposing to replace the existing vegetation that is disturbed by our construction activities with a low/no maintenance area along the entire north side of our site, with the ultimate goal being an overall enhancement and expansion of the buffer from the highest quality natural wetland features. It is the intention of the developer/owner and the development team to earnestly engage with the stakeholders for this site, including City Staff, Riley Purgatory Watershed Staff, and our immediate Lake Ann community, to enhance, protect, and highlight the phenomenal natural resource that will become our future Moment’s of Chanhassen home. To help to mitigate the impacts of these setback modification requests, we are proposing significant enhancements to the building architecture, landscape improvements and screening. We are proposing enhanced screening along the south side of the parking lot and building foundation, as well as minimizing grading along the north side of the building so as to retain as much naturally occurring native plant material as possible. We also are proposing to reintroduce native/LID (Low Impact Design) plant material, and native plant restoration to further improve the stormwater runoff into the adjacent wetland areas. We also plan to remove the invasive impacts from the Buckthorn species that has likely negatively impacted the viability of the natural vegetation throughout the site. The Owners/Operators of the Moments of Chanhassen are proud be providing high quality senior care in their currently operating facility in Lakeville but are equally excited to start construction of their second home on this premier Chanhassen location in 2020. Thanks for your consideration and attention on this matter. Best Regards, Patrick Sarver, Civil Site Group Elizabeth Wright, Moments of Chanhassen CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by rezoning from (RR) Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R- 16), for property with the following legal description: That part of Tracts A and B below: Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distance 195.0 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence west along said south line a distance of 361.00 feet; thence northerly parallel to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 593.20 feet; thence deflecting right at an angle of 62 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 150 feet, more or less, to the center line of creek; thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with a line drawn northerly and parallel with said east line from point of beginning; thence southerly along said parallel line to the point of beginning. Tract B: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distance 195.0 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence northerly parallel with the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to its intersection with the centerline of the creek; thence easterly along said centerline of the creek to its intersection with the east line said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence southerly along said east line to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence west along said south line to the point of beginning; which lies northerly of the northerly boundary of Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-09 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for said county. Carver County, Minnesota. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this ordinance. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April 2020, by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ______________________________) CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 13, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN WITH WETLAND AND PARKING SETBACK VARIANCES WHEREAS, the applicant, Civil Site Group, has requested rezoning of property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R-16), lot consolidation and site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48-unit continuing care retirement facility on property described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 4, 2020; and WHEREAS, Planning Commission found that the request met all the criteria to approve said variance and recommended approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated February 4, 2020; and WHEREAS, City Council has reviewed the plans and staff report for the proposed variance. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as follows: “The Chanhassen City Council approves the ordinance rezoning property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R-16), lot consolidation and approving the resolution for site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48-unit continuing care retirement facility (The Moments of Chanhassen), as shown in plans dated February 18, 2020, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and decision.” Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT EXHIBIT A That part of Tracts A and B below: Tract A: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distance 195.0 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence west along said south line a distance of 361.00 feet; thence northerly parallel to the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter a distance of 593.20 feet; thence deflecting right at an angle of 62 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds a distance of 150 feet, more or less, to the center line of creek; thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with a line drawn northerly and parallel with said east line from point of beginning; thence southerly along said parallel line to the point of beginning. Tract B: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 23 West, Carver County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, distance 195.0 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence northerly parallel with the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to its intersection with the centerline of the creek; thence easterly along said centerline of the creek to its intersection with the east line said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence southerly along said east line to the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence west along said south line to the point of beginning; which lies northerly of the northerly boundary of Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 10-09 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for said county. CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ( ss. COUNTYOFCARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly swom, on oath deposes that she is and was on January 23,2020, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk ofthe City ofChanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing to consider a request to rezone property located north of W. 78th Street and west of Lake Ann Park from Rural Residential District (RR) to High Density Residential District (R-16); wetland alteration permit, lot consolidation and site plan review with varilnces for the construction of a 48-unit continuing care retirement fecility. Zoned Rural Residential District (RR), Planning Case No. 2020-02 to the persons named on attached Exhibit "A", by enclosing a copy ofsaid notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses ofsuch owners were those appearing as such by the records ofthe County Treasurer, Cawer County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Kim . Meurvissen- D lerk Subscribed and swom to before me this i2{h1ay of- \ank r-1- r ,2020. \ \{ I SIECIGII{Gil6y Aab*n Gry*trl.rrt!'r,ea JEA'{ Ud/Y\ n Notary Public (Seal) Subiect Parcels Di3claimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map as a compihtjon of records, infomaton and data located in various crt. county, state and federal offces and other sou.ces regardang lhe area shovm. and is to be used lor reference purpo6es only. The City does not wanant that the GeogBphic lnlomation System (GlS) Data used to prepare this map are enor free. and the Cily does not represent that the Gls Data can be used for navoational. tracling or any olher purpos€ requiring exacting measuremenl of dastance or direction or precjsion in the depiction of geographic features. The preceding disclaimer is povid€d puBuanl to Minnesota SlaMes 5466.03, Subd. 21 (2000), and the user of this map acknolvledoes thai the Crty shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waives all claims, and ag.ees to defend, indemnrry. and hold harmless the City from any and all claims blought by user, its employees or agents. or third parties which arise out of the use/s access or use of data provided. (TAX_NAME> <TAX-ADD-L,I I (TAX_ADD_L2D, ITAX_ADD_L3> ( Next Record)r(TAX_NAii ED (TAX_ADD_L1D aTAX_ADD_L2I, <TAX_ADD_L3I Subject Parcels Disclainier This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be u6ed as one. This map is a @mpilation ot records, anformalion and data located in vaious city. county, stiate and federaloffices and other sources regarding the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City does not wanant thal the Geographic lnformaton System (GlS) Dala used to prepare this map are enor free, and the City does not represenl that the GIS Oata can be used for navigational, tracking or any other purpose requaring exactjng measurement of distance Or darection or precisrcn in lhe depiction of geographic features The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant lo Minnesota Statutes 5466.03, Subd. 2l (2000), and the user of this map aclnowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages, and expressly waaves all claams. and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Cily from any and alldaims brought by Use.. its employees o{ agents, or third padies which anse out of the users acaess or use of data provided. E reffiI{ r ,.:.i 'r /L 5 p ,E E Eq.qFEc!oot-(!oNoN $ z^oa -oo LL j (5! oaF E->d)o(soF.F.u;(lt-o E(EEo ocJoo (oI o at..,]i5EcC)oodE=doq)coN =()o co Eo c) BorHE= -q)E6(! =OF (l!EeeEo-(,6tE.9o=EE E 5EE€l:gE;(! (l.,:=o-tr 6 gE}5ESEEEq: b q :r 6Bg:E HpEE E ;p; g a--E(/)o; i @F.=EEocoo)oI;Elt)o-oq)coNo o 0,ld E (U oo c ID:oa (.).E (o(! c.q =-c o) -oo .N UJ c,9ObE3dEtL ETo-€6<s 3F(oE oEo,qN6(o- toal)=98!l _o)a+iE [:u EcEEs S9 iEEI,E, ggEESEEE EeiEE€r P bXEPf, o.6 E i=! 6EEEI EcEgc*;i E:E=t iII 3,3e E.:r eEE; EEEE $o H-c .: l,/,(,F(Jo-!-P;PE8tr5Eo6;c.i<.is oE.,IDEoanoFoool'=c!o" (,E o o o. (tl 2 EF . ;rBa€ uNa d; eSsE3"€I :ts ii €ri! E E ss-i:EE E;;TEIEp s.g;i6isI iEBl 3.;€'6c-EIEEEiiE i5EIEBiEli cicol o ; E ,a oc ?cq c() o-ccoEc'6 ;t B oa).orl)=.._11)-c! o)! o o- =o (g oq)E't !Eo o3c ut n) ooo uioocc)c')(!o,cE0)n)Eco)E=c.9ooEc rl) o !co (t, E 0) o '6 oo o o-f c .9!a =luz q E 6 :: a & = E lEaiEEEstsigiigl Es!;ii;iEiEEiiEE EEiEiiiEEEiiEEAE iEgEigE;iEEEEeEiEg6. i';E i:€(, a!o o (,ooJ t!oo o o- o o.tl o ]o to CLI o- 96o.= +'E-(,o.g =E EDtroo=Eoo.=6:.oiEtrrE.9oEo:oo.s oEor!.98 OEza o6s =oEo EDtr oo =PE'= '6oaa!, .=-E.JE=o€odss.}OEgE Eo- zr@ oot! tr6 o ! ,E 6 ,E ,E -q ! E .9 F E cioo I'r (! oNoN * of -ooLl- j(!E It)fF o2 d) d, o ooF.t- ll)-o EoEo cf (o = o tt .9 i5 6 cop ot t,tr !oc N lE co E o) 0) Eco or<3= Ea;3F(Dol) sA =o cE.E(,C i;aqo9= E@= EEobg ov.:l-6 3 0:t?i; 99o::o39 -or o 3f -- q.)o FS a 8.et-o -= (l, 9EE oE y t- =E.}c_d, F3;tro; (E= 8E;EEOo.Eo-otafo- Ri9qro* 6-oo Eg(Eo 1g(goacq) a)o q) e(!a .9 o(L Eo).E =E o)-o(5 .N UJ .i = L 115 E3 ll).Y l@dg co lL E€o- -o6<.9 6!(oE "aBx3(o- o o)';i Eo- n)c, os_.33^E 3 i-t= sc ; EEEE EseEiE e'", 8s€ E :3EEE EEe! EE qH :=3EE:: XP g gEE Ei se E * 6€ fleE*gEEfl IEE; -EiE FEd6^Egl-(uc(Jo-N(ei cil., a, ID E c .9 .2 E Eoo o) .ac !o {, o , "rBt*lE:5$E;Es EE$EEiEiE sp a E6:,eh =ai ar X =G e-?latlEi$E ;EEIEHgEEg 3aIIE HI eE€ a5 d o 0) E oc ?c Ea (!Ec(5E (.) '=> lt(!pc n) oo)o ovEsi 6E;B 9.a6>E ,::(!voo)iE -c Pe XE -oo_9 =scr([E 6o b8op.> .t 9lop6 eEo<a=cEO'L6i =*}E 9 E _1 n E ! t 6 .9 3 g c q l g EEiEEEirsiisiisi ialsiilggiasisgE5. i'; E F c6(, oo o ll,ooJ ooo(l.o o. o o. q, 3o Eo ELo o- qi; o.=ct t: *'E (l.CE?}E .6 ..o9ca.9 !, o=A'E3Ooo ol, ,.o9trEoo o=(uEfooo >EtooEcL t!et4J >Et.o cLoeto.J od,zoCOloloF.3F-F@F.oco(ooot Io6 Ix F F. z2z>i>zaz (,=o IIzoz<t<I(JIL'(,U Ia6 Ix t 3I = &,O^>E booi 50<o st F.r@.rg(oo@ o(, >u,>!9OF 6fg E(JJqEE .obx d.=<EY. ]>YJEO<FJO-oooON.r01 OirooaoNo Osl.r z I F z ooao aolft-Fddooao aoooLO (O (o (o zz >a 5aGd cLd99lloo FF oooo FF tsBFF IIFF (h or zz IIzz I-(J(J oo FF oooo.rO oo oo NC{ CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 4, 2020 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Randall, John Tietz, Michael McGonagill, and Laura Skistad MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad and Doug Reeder STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; and George Bender, Assistant City Engineer PUBLIC PRESENT: Joy Gorra 1680 West 78th Street Jeff Schuler 7900 Excelsior Boulevard Patrick Sarver 4931 West 35th Street, St. Louis Park Elizabeth Wright 7900 Excelsior Boulevard PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REZONG PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF WEST 78TH STREET AND WEST OF LAKE ANN PARK FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (RR) TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-16), LOT CONSOLIDATION AND SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 48 UNIT CONTINUING CARE RETIREMENT FACILITY. Weick: And with that I will turn it over to Sharmeen. Al-Jaff: Thank you. Weick: Great thank you. Al-Jaff: Chairman Weick, members of the Planning Commission, good evening. The application before you today is to rezone a property from rural residential to high density residential. There is a site plan with a variance and the purpose for this is for the construction of a 48 unit continuing care facility. The site is located north of West 78th Street, west of Lake Ann Park. It is again for the construction of a continuing care retirement facility. The land use for this site designates it as high density residential. This designation is established to accommodate high density developments and apartment buildings. A continuing care retirement facility is a permitted use in this designation. As mentioned there is a rezoning request looking at rezoning the property from rural residential to high density residential. The property north and west of the Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 2 subject site contains a single family home and is guided residential high density which is the same guiding as the subject site. To the east of the subject site is Lake Ann Park and that is guided as open space. South of the subject site is West 78th Street. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan addresses senior housing. One of the categories that it looks at is seniors in our community and what they need. There is a demand for 1,206 senior housing units and that would include owner occupied, rental as well as service enriched. Of the 1,206 we need 316 service enriched units. Since 2014 the City has built or seen development of 111 continuing care or service enriched dwelling units and those include Riley Crossing and Beehive which is also known of Trivai today. If this development was approved we will reach 159 units which is in keeping with the City’s vision for the seniors to meet their needs. Briefly about this site. There are existing conditions that need to be pointed out specifically the fact that there are wetlands along the northern portion of the site as well as Riley Creek that abuts the entire northern segment. One of the other things that we need to point out is the fact that the site is comprised of two parcels. Tract A and Tract B. One of the conditions of approval for this application is to consolidate those two sites into one. The site plan is to construct 6,500 square foot continuing care facility. Hard surface coverage on this site is 34.5 percent. The city code requires a maximum of 35 percent because this site is located within the shoreland overlay district of Lake Ann. Part of trying to figure out how to best develop this site we had multiple applications and meetings with the watershed district, with the applicant trying to find how can we meet the intent of the ordinance rather than the literal interpretation of the ordinance and still accommodate development on this site. One of the requests that the applicant has made was trying to meet the buffer requirements but request a zero setback from the edge of the wetland buffer. That is a variance that the City was in working with the watershed agreed to recommend approval of. However we said a minimum of 5 foot setback would be required and the watershed district requirements would have to be met. That is a condition of approval of that variance. The other variance dealt with parking setback. The city code requires a 25 foot setback and that is intended for screening purposes. Again meeting the intent of the ordinance which is the screening we were able to accomplish that through intensified landscaping and we worked with the City Forester who basically was very agreeable to what the applicant was proposing. The architecture of the building is reflecting a pronounced entrance into the building. There are terraced landscaping areas. They can be seen along the front of the building. The building is very tastefully designed. The architectural style is unique to the building. It will fit in with the surrounding area. This is a shot of the rear of the building. All the facades viewed by the public have received equal attention. There is over 50 percent transparency through the use of glass windows, door. The roof line is staggered. It adds articulation to the design of the building. There are multiple pitched elements on the building and there’s a condition of approval that all roof top equipment be screened and we believe that with the pitched elements along all sides of the building that can easily be accomplished. Materials on the building are of high quality limestone. Stucco and everything is durable. Again all elevations have received equal treatment and attention. There is one monument sign proposed on the site and it is intended to be located along the southwest corner of the site. The sign cannot exceed 24 square feet in area and 5 feet in height. The applicant will need to apply for a sign permit. The parking is located along the south portion of the site. Per code the applicant is required to provide 44 spaces. Or 41 spaces, Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 3 I’m sorry and the applicant is providing 44 spaces. Of those 27 will be surface parking. 17 will be underground parking spaces. Landscaping is in compliance with ordinance and as mentioned it is used heavily along the southern portion of the site to screen the parking lot. There’s also some equipment to serve this building located along the southeast corner of the site and heavy landscaping is utilized to provide adequate screening. At this moment I would like to turn it over to engineering staff George Bender to address access issues. Bender: Good evening commissioners. To continue with Sharmeen’s presentation, the site will be accessed off of West 78th. There’s one proposed access location. It is located far enough away from the median. This is a collector roadway West 78th. They may have to adjust some of the striping that is part of the design of the median. The parking has, had turning movements preliminary run on it. I believe that the applicant received the new ladder truck to use as a design vehicle. They were you know advised to run it if they have another larger vehicle that would be used at the site to use that as part of their turning movements. They will need to show an updated turning movement and analysis because there have been changes made. This is a little bit bigger picture blow up of it to help because the last one was a little bit small. Utilities are a bit of a challenge for this site. Watermain is fine. There’s watermain out in West 78th for them to tie into. There was a condition where they proposed two taps to the watermain. One for domestic service and one for fire service and a condition of approval is to switch that to one tap so that we have less public infrastructure to maintain. The purple line here is the MCES interceptor that is on private property. MCES has an easement over it but for the purposes of this applicant there is a distance to access it. It is also really deep. I believe in the neighborhood of 40 plus feet and to connect to it instead of you securing an easement from the property owner they are proposing to run it through the right-of-way. Across our right-of-way and connect to one of MCES’s manholes here. They will have to build it and construct and drop into that structure. They will have to file for an MCES permit for this and build it to their standards. The City will have to get involved from the perspective of MCES will not grant a private applicant to be in there so there will have to be a maintenance agreement between the City and MCES and the applicant will have to then be responsible to the City for it. McGonagill: So the City will have ownership of this…? Bender: No. This would remain private. So we also plan to require them to straighten it and not add a manhole into our roadway so that was another condition so they would create a different alignment for that pipe. From a stormwater perspective they are proposing to collect runoff from the roof and the parking lot and discharge it to the, a filtration pond which they are planning to construct on the east side of the site as shown in blue here. That will also require a maintenance agreement. According to the modeling that has been sent in the stormwater management report, it will need TSS and so total suspended solids and total phosphorus reductions. They are not currently meeting abstraction from the site. They’re able to show that they can abstract just .19 inch. The city code requires a one inch and Riley-Bluff-Purgatory Creek watershed district requires 1.1 inches. They are, they have submitted for a restriction due to the clay soils. The watershed district has sent them a review back of the entire stormwater for it but as part of it they Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 4 are requiring that in order to obtain a restriction they are going to have to prove that they cannot meet the 1.1 and the watershed district has a number of findings that the applicant will have to prove and go through pretty much a very rigorous production in order to justify it in order to get a restriction down to .55. So that is a bit of an unknown right now. The submittal to the watershed district was deemed incomplete and there is, they sent them a list of conditions as part of their review and there are a number of them. As part of Sharmeen also mentioned this, they are proposing to do buffer averaging from the wetland. The watershed district has a 20 foot minimum requirement to be adhered to. The applicant is proposing a zero foot setback as Sharmeen had shown along here. Engineering feels that a minimum of 5 foot setback needs to be adhered to so that they can do maintenance on and get through that area on the back side of the building and that is a bare minimum and currently they’re showing 20 feet total from, setback from the wetland and so that, to have 5 foot would mean that they would have to get a variance from the watershed district to reduce that minimum setback to 15 feet. One point that I wanted to make is, you know along this wetland buffer that’s going to have to be planted with native species so when you looked at the rendering it looked all nice and green like it was lawn. Well that isn’t going to be able to appear that way. It’s going to have to have a more native appearance to it. So in two areas it’s close. In this area you know is of prime concern right now so that will still have to be worked out from a setback perspective. Skistad: How long is that space? Like long is that? Weick: Yeah let’s hold our questions. Bender: To be honest I did not measure it but it’s about two rooms width I would assume according to this drawing that a room is somewhere between maybe an average of 5 foot wide. The applicant can probably answer that question for us. There are a few grading concerns. The applicant is showing grading that’s outside of the limits of the property so that will need to be addressed. The watershed district also picked up on this requirement and they will have to provide either change their plans to match within their property limits or provide proof and documentation of being allowed to work outside of their property. You know their landscaping plan still needs to be updated to show what they are going to be doing within the buffer area itself and they will need to file for an NPDES construction permit due to the disturbance being greater than one acre. I’ll turn it over to Sharmeen again. Al-Jaff: Staff is recommending approval of the application with conditions outlined in the staff report and at this point we would be happy to answer any questions you might have. Some of the issues that were raised by the Planning Commission, some of the questions will be addressed by the applicant specifically dealing with setbacks and the buffer area. Weick: Okay. And I know we do have, I’m sensing we have a lot of questions so as we ask for questions or clarifications we’ll try and, instead of going Commissioner by Commissioner let’s try as best we can, I know it’s tough but try and go topic by topic. So feel free to jump in someone’s mentioning grading and we can keep it. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 5 Aanenson: Chairman if I may. Weick: Yeah. Aanenson: I think it might be helpful to let the applicant make their presentation because I thin that might help clarify some of the questions and then maybe, or just maybe fine tune some of your questions if that’s alright. Weick: Okay. If that’s okay with the commission. Is that alright? Good enough. Okay then I would invite the applicant to make a presentation. Maybe answer some of the anticipated questions, that would be great. Welcome. Patrick Sarver: Excellent, thank you so much. My name is Patrick Sarver. I’m with Civil Site Group, landscape architect by professional and project manager for this site. I also have with me this evening Jeff Schuler who’s the architect on the project and Elizabeth Wright who’s the owner/operator of the, what will be the Moments of Chanhassen and she’s the current owner/ operator of the Moments of Lakeville where they have a similar facility. A phase 1 that’s in operation and a phase 2 that is starting construction momentarily in Lakeville. Yes to address some of the comments here, regarding the setback. First of all I wanted to thank. It has been, we have been working on this project for a great length of time and staff and engineering have been absolutely fantastic and the watershed. They have been a treat to work with and this is a, I hope you can appreciate how complicated a site this is in that there’s a significant amount of grade. There’s very poor soils and there is a, because of the wetland location at the narrow point of the site it makes it very complicated to get just about anything in here at all so we’ve been able to work with the architect. Work with the program for the site and work with the natural features and spend extra time making sure that we get it right and one of those efforts to get it a little more right is that we are, we’ve been able to just in the past couple days modify the architecture of the building so that we’re able to get to the 5 foot setbacks all along, as requested all along through this area by essentially modifying the building to take this section and move it farther away and then also move the building again further farther away just to make sure that we’re, we’ve got as much space there as possible. One of the, regarding the landscaping, it probably we could have did a better job explaining about how we wanted to restore that natural feature back there. The idea is what’s unique about this population is they don’t go outside so there is, I mean they’ll go outside on patio spaces but because of just the containment issues what you want to do is you want to create environment as exciting and as lively for them to live inside yet feel connected with the outside. You’ll notice if you go back to the elevations we can do this a little bit later but there is a clear story that goes around the upper portion of the building and that is an attempt to try to create a streetscape environment within the inside of the building as much as possible. I think if you had a chance to go visit the site in Lakeville they do an amazing job with the inside of the space so when you walk into this that every unit has a unique personality like you would be walking down a streetscape and you see, oh here’s a brick façade or here’s a little lap siding so that each one of the residents has a feeling like this is my home. This is my unique Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 6 space. This is my and they do a remarkable job and have been recognized for it nationally for the efforts that they do to great lengths to number one introduce light into the facility and to make it be as pleasant as possible. Along those same lines we think this is a fantastic site and the effort that we’ve done with staff by positioning the building essentially in a natural oasis where it gives them an opportunity to have views out those lower windows directly into natural environment where there’s birds, butterflies, wildlife. The idea that that is all completely natural through there is our intention. The down side with the rendering software is it renders nice. It renders the building nice but there’s not really a good way to reflect that green space but it is proposed to be a natural and native features as much as possible. Other pieces that I wanted to address. Well we’ve addressed the setback. We continue to work with the watershed to address and make sure that we’re going to meet all their requirements. Again the soils are clay and it’s a requirement of the watershed and the City to infiltrate and these are the worst level of soils to infiltrate and they’re the most complicated to try to do that but we’re doing everything we can do to try to demonstrate as greatest infiltration as possible but we’re working through that demonstration process with the watershed. Turning movements. I can go to the next one. We have since updated this graphic. This shows a current turning movement as with the proposed and we have submitted this to the City as well. This, we will also be providing additional as we revise drawings for the watershed we’ll be including those hopefully with a full complete set by next, the end of next week so that when we turn it into the City we’ll have as many of the conditions as we can stricken from the approval process and the comment letter from staff to the City Council so we’re in agreement with the spirit of the comments on the letter and we’re going to do everything we can do to resolve all of them as it moves forward. I believe that’s it and we can stand for any questions. Again the owner and the architect is here and is available and I’ll be available as well. I’ll take any questions you have right now otherwise I’ll take a seat. Weick: I think stay and we’ll go ahead and open it up for questions or clarification. You can certainly direct it at the applicant or the City depending on what your question is but I would certainly open that up. Tietz: Chairman? Weick: Yep. Tietz: I appreciate you taking that jog and pulling it back but have you created a pinch point at the entry where you have a building mass of one story and it looks like the building is within a couple feel of your sidewalk. Kind of traded one problem for another. Patrick Sarver: Yeah, but I don’t think so though. Tietz: It just appears on your new drawing it appears very, very tight at that point. Patrick Sarver: I do see your concern there. Yeah. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 7 Tietz: Yeah just as a visual pinch point I think when you’re arriving at the front of the building and I don’t know if you want to trade off the wetland issue for this or fight for the wetland issue. Patrick Sarver: I think we may have some options to mitigate the intensity of that pinch point by possibly sliding those 13 stalls that are sitting there. Rotate them maybe 10-12 feet to the west. Make that island on the west side. Tietz: We won’t design it for you. I’m just, I noticed that right away because when I was looking at your drawings and I saw the comments about the tightness to the wetland I thought about whether you could slide that, make that building component on the west slide down and obviously you did that but now I’m looking at this and I don’t have the elevation to look at and I don’t know where that roof line is at that point. It just looks like it’s awkward. Patrick Sarver: Noted. We’ll do our best to help mitigate it, thank you. Tietz: Okay. Weick: I have a question that’s, it’s about the buffers and I think you both kind of addressed them but what is, if there were no, I’m confused because we were talking about averaging. If there were no building there what is the buffer? I mean how close can you build, what’s the code? Al-Jaff: Including the buffer you have to maintain a 50 foot setback. Weick: Okay. So it’s. Tietz: But Steve if you look at the original grading plan and look at the first floor elevation here, the original grade is a 10 foot drop from the point of the edge of the wetland. The wetland buffer down to the Type 1/2 wetlands so it’s like going up to the underside of those beams all the way down to the wetland. You know you begin to wonder sometimes you know what that buffer does when you have such a significant grade change. Aanenson: I just bring up herein lies the problem with this property. We’re worked on this property for 15-20 years. It’s always been a challenge to find someone. We’ve had really a lot of different uses on there so this one seemed to have the most viability and so Sharmeen and George have worked really hard with the applicant to try to, to wiggle it in there and I think Commissioner Tietz brings up a good point. I mean. Tietz: It’s difficult. Aanenson: It’s difficult right. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 8 Tietz: Yeah in this situation I don’t know when you look architecturally at that façade and given that this is a wetland that, if there’s so much water and it gets so high it’s going to go into Riley. It’s going to take a pretty significant storm I would think on this site to get into Riley and so encroaching on, you know taking that 5 feet off on the back side I don’t know if that’s, if it’s worth the front and dealing with the front as opposed to addressing just going for it on the wetland and taking it right up to the edge in the back. Not trying to create that additional 5 feet. I mean in an emergency, I don’t know. You know if you’re dealing, if it’s a maintenance issue and you’re dealing with the exterior of the building in 15 or 20 years I guess you can access that, that buffer zone. You can drive on that buffer zone. You could do maintenance work if you had to. Patrick Sarver: One of the items I wanted to add relative to the wetlands. There are two different classifications of the wetlands. The lower quality wetland is the one that’s that longer lengthy piece and that’s actually a wooded wetland so there’s not, it’s not, doesn’t really, it actually has a slope through there. It just poorly drained slope which means that over time because it’s poorly drained there’s been more soils that have become hydric and it has created wetland plant material there and that’s why it’s, initially on our original wetland delineation it wasn’t part of there because it’s not identified but upon the TEP panel walking the site it was identified and it was further indicated. So the fact or the concern that it might fill up with water is actually not because you say there’s just the grade drops so dramatically off to the north that it’s not going to be, that’s not going to be a concern. Our concern was we wanted to make sure that we had positive drainage out to the edge where that wetland is and that we’ve still got areas that contribute water so that they, we don’t compromise the wetland. Tietz: But it does look like on that northwest corner in that area that we’re talking about, you drop the grade down to 960 so you’re virtually at the same edge of the wetland with, you’re going to be grading right up to the wetland. It appears on your grading plan. Is that accurate or did I misinterpret that? Patrick Sarver: No that’s accurate. Tietz: Okay. So I’d be more concern during construction than I would be after construction I guess. Patrick Sarver: Yes. Weick: I’m just not clear because even the, and correct me if I’m wrong but the 20 feet that’s shown here is an arbitrary buffer. Bender: It is a minimum buffer is probably how I’d say it. The actual buffer that the watershed district is looking for is a 40 foot buffer around the wetland. Weick: Okay. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 9 Bender: But they will allow buffer averaging so it can get wider in other areas and narrower in areas of need for development to a minimum of 20 feet. Does help answer the question? Al-Jaff: That is a common practice. Weick: Okay. Okay. Aanenson: If you look at that in subdivisions sometimes there’s a pinch point and so instead of losing the lot you average it and pick it up on a different lot. Weick: Okay. Bender: The buffer is not intended to be used for maintenance of the building though. It’s intended to remain a buffer per the watershed district. Skistad: The purpose of that being specifically, just when you say take care of the outside of the building, what do you mean? Bender: So like taking care, maintaining the landscaping. Just being able to get around it. The buffer. It’s not intended to drive a forklift through it. Weick: Go ahead. McGonagill: George on the, I think I know the answer to this. I just want to be sure. We have a lot of development going on to the north with the development up there and what is a 100 year flood look like? Is it all going to drain away towards the lake the way it falls that way or was there any possibility, how far will it come up towards the building? Bender: They did not show the 100 year flood elevation for Riley Creek on their plans. I was talking to our City Engineer about that a little bit yesterday. The other thing that I noticed is you know that will be another thing that we kind of have to work through. It’s also noted on Riley Bluff watershed district’s comments so it’s another thing that needs to be included but there is a FEMA flood zone that kind of goes back here that we can see on our GIS software. And the reason that was the main reason I was talking to the City Engineer about it is that, you know where they’re proposing to discharge that pipe appears to be within the FEMA flood zone but at the same time we don’t, that data was imported from a Carver County and we feel that we need to do more research on the accuracy of that data because from what we see in that area it doesn’t seem to make complete sense to us so at this point it’s something that only may have to be worked through. McGonagill: Yeah but my concern comes from we’re changing the watershed quite a bit up in this area. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 10 Bender: Yep. McGonagill: And a lot of it goes into Riley. Bender: Right. They will have to show us that. Patrick Sarver: Just an added comment. Just for your reference. I don’t consider, I don’t think that the 100 year flood plain is of concern. The grade of that Riley Creek is 943. 942. 943. And our low edge is 959 so we’re 16 feet above that. I don’t see that we’re close to that 100 year flood at all. McGonagill: Okay. Bender: I can tell you what shows in our GIS does not approach the area of the building. It goes to about halfway through this little pie shaped piece that they know. McGonagill: Okay. Along the, Sharmeen along the 78th where the landscaping’s going, that’s just trees. That’s not berm. Or is it berm? Al-Jaff: It will be mainly bushes and trees. McGonagill: Okay because I was just, and where I was going with this was the proximity of that landscaping to the trail. That’s a pretty active trail. You know how close is it going to be? Are people going to get into the trees? Are they going to get into the bushes? You follow me? Al-Jaff: Sure. McGonagill: And will it impede, will it impede trail access? Al-Jaff: It will not impede access. The trail is in the public right-of-way. The landscaping will be on the actual property. McGonagill: Okay, would it be away from the trail you think? Patrick Sarver: I would imagine it’s going to be at least 6 feet away from the edge of the trail. I think our landscaping there maybe shown slightly inaccurate in that we’re planting into the right- of-way. I don’t think that’s, MnDOT is not going to, it was, as we’re putting this together and adding as much landscaping as we can we thicken it up but we’re going to make sure that that landscaping is entirely located within our property and it will just be heavily landscaped between, in that space that we have behind the curb up to the property line. McGonagill: So basically it will be the same grade that’s there today. Just… Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 11 Patrick Sarver: Exactly, yes. McGonagill: And there’s not a fence or anything, there’s just bushes? Patrick Sarver: No. Yes just bushes. And from a berm standpoint, from a berming or grade change standpoint at the midpoint the trail is let’s say right at where that front entry is, that trail is at a 66 and then the edge of the parking is up at 69 so it does, it does slope up and away and then, so it kind of sets it up a little bit but as you move to the east that transition changes to where the trail and then it drops down toward where the parking’s at. McGonagill: Okay. Skistad: How big is that bed? That landscaping bed approximately. Patrick Sarver: It will be landscaped from, it’s basically, it will be fully landscaped from the property line to the, so it’s 10 feet wide. Property line to the curb line. McGonagill: Sharmeen in the staff report I just want to be sure I understood. When you talk about the, this being service enabled. Service enriched units basically what we’re talking about here are memory care type units. Al-Jaff: You are correct. McGonagill: For Alzheimer’s. It’s not, this is basically a full nursing facility to some degree. Secured. You know people are in there. They’re there. That’s kind of the way it was. Al-Jaff: You are correct. Memory care. McGonagill: Yes okay. Patrick Sarver: No residents are bringing their car. McGonagill: Yeah that was the next question I was going is the parking lot you know which with that. I will tell you before I start. I have a lot of questions on this. Not being critical. My family believes I’ll probably be in one of these real soon what I hear from them. I’m just going through questions that I would have that I think the public might have too so I just wanted to paraphrase that. Al-Jaff: Absolutely. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 12 McGonagill: In the, so with that security, what I was looking at if there’s really, you have security at the door coming in the front towards the parking lot and then you have some in the back is the way that will work? Elizabeth Wright: Little slower moving. So the current existing Moments of Lakeville is fully secured. All the exits and entryways. We don’t believe in having wings locked off so we try to give as much freedom as possible to the residents. So there’s plenty of research and the technology we have implemented has provided us with an ability to protect the residents from exiting and egress when it’s you know not called for. McGonagill: Yeah and that’s the reason I ask because being right on 78th like that, you’re right on a very busy street. I saw the end of the walls and stuff that would go, and okay that’s how they’re doing it. Every couple doors. I’ve had some experience with facilities like this personally. It’s kind of like okay I was just imagining myself being with a family member there. I’m just going through some of these are, I don’t know how you want to go through, something about category and so. Weick: Keep going. McGonagill: So Sharmeen we’re halfway to the goal on service enabled so what others are up? Do you see other ones coming? Aanenson: Can I address that? McGonagill: Sure. Aanenson: So this is the newly adopted Comprehensive Plan which the City Council will be officially adopting so those numbers come 2014 when we actually started the plan so this is kind of a hybrid from the Maxfield Study, then the Carver County did an updated their plan so if you look at where the City in their vision sees kind of those buckets of housing types. So they’re broken into ownership, senior and rental and the thing that we don’t want to have to make a well rounded community we don’t want to have what we call service enriched. It’d be more like you need it’s kind of dependent. You can’t live independently so, because we’ve had requests for maybe 500-600 all service enriched and we don’t see that. The feasibility to manage all that. McGonagill: Well that was my next question. Aanenson: So that plays into some of that. McGonagill: There’s a cap for us. Aanenson: Yep exactly. So when we look at each of these projects, this is tying back into our plan to say what is the City’s vision. How much of this do we want because we know there’s Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 13 some other senior projects coming in in Avienda. There might be one other one that might be you know service enriched. There also might be some that are adult owned and those can be in a coop or a condominium or something like that so again trying to provide what we believe and as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan a well rounded community with different housing choices meeting different needs. So we for illustratively just showed you where we’re at from 2014 when this was submitted as part of the Comprehensive Plan and where we are today so we’re within that range. So it’s also when we’re meeting with people we can kind of say you know here’s how many are left. Here’s where we think we’re going. What the city’s vision is so that’s really what that’s about. McGonagill: And it follows onto that comment where another one of my questions came was the impact on emergency responders and city services and county services. Aanenson: That’s correct. McGonagill: You know you will have like staff members you have on site. You’ve got quite a few people but when someone falls I mean usually it’s a 911 call isn’t it? I mean what you have to do and I think about impact on county sheriff. I think about fortunately the ambulance is right around the corner but what does that look like for you and how is that handled? How is the cost of that handled? Elizabeth Wright: Well one of the pluses for us is that our model is set out with having licensed nursing on staff 24 hours a day. McGonagill: Okay. Elizabeth Wright: So those falls that you would normally find at a normal facility where they may not have that opportunity, allows our licensed nurses to actually assess the situation and rather than make that immediate call, unless there’s a clear and obviously injury that needs to be made, it allows us the opportunity to treat that and call the doctor that we have on our staff as well to make sure that we’re not sending someone out without an appropriate reason for it. So it’s not every fall that would happen within the Moments would require something to that effect so we eliminate a lot of those types of calls. McGonagill: Okay. Skistad: So you would have your own transport then? Elizabeth Wright: No, no, no. We still utilize the transport. Obviously we have the same in Lakeville but like I said most, it comes down to a decision between the nursing and families quite frankly because with this particular population families may not want it to be an emergency send out to an ER so if they live locally they have the ability to make that decision to come in and transport their loved one themselves. It’s something that we provide as an option for them. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 14 McGonagill: Will this facility also transition all the way to end of life care? Like hospice care. Do you do that as well? Elizabeth Wright: We do not provide hospice care specifically but we do have, we do provide the opportunity for outside hospice to come in and provide that care, yes. McGonagill: Correct, okay. Elizabeth Wright: Absolutely. McGonagill: Now look at the side it doesn’t, you know you’re expanding in Lakeville but I don’t see how you’d expand here. I mean is expansion pretty much none to be had here do you think? Elizabeth Wright: Oh you know to be honest with you we would have loved more, to be able to have more units. I think there’s a need in the area locally to be able to fill that but the piece of property doesn’t lend itself to that. Until recently I was a resident of Chanhassen so for me this particular area is something that is near and dear to my heart so I like this area. Would we like to expand if it’s a possibility someplace either if not in Chanhassen nearby but outside of a certain radius, for sure. McGonagill: Well I was just you know on this site there’s not really room. Elizabeth Wright: No. There’s no. McGonagill: I didn’t think so. I didn’t think you were going to convert the garages or anything like that. Elizabeth Wright: No. McGonagill: Yeah. I’ve got a couple more but why not just turn on other people can ask some questions. Weick: Need a break? McGonagill: No. I just, you know me I’ll just keep going and going. Randall: Well with you being recently from Chan I know you said you moved or whatever but I think of the 4th of July and I think about how much traffic and the fireworks and everything, is that going to be a concern to you at all with your facility? Elizabeth Wright: No. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 15 Randall: As far as your residents and the McGonagill: And the lights. Elizabeth Wright: No. Randall: The lights and that type of thing. Elizabeth Wright: No, it’s not. Randall: Okay. Elizabeth Wright: And for me just because they have dementia doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be able to enjoy everything that we all enjoy. Randall: Yeah. Elizabeth Wright: So quite frankly having the 4th of July and being able to see the fireworks would be wonderful. There’d be an opportunity quite frankly. Randall: Okay, that’s great. That was the only question I had. McGonagill: Kind of follow onto that enjoying things. I agree with what you’re saying to do that. One of the things and this is more just of a personal request and observation both to you and the staff. When I was thinking about this if I had a family member here and what I would be doing and what I’ve done in the past is one thing is all the places to put someone in a wheelchair and take them out are in the front. You know and you know when I’ve had people in facilities before I’ve looked for places to get out away. To have a sanctuary where we could just have time. These are wonderful facilities to have for people where they can be safe but it can be somewhat disconcerting when you’re in them trying to be with your family member or get outside the room when it’s nice weather and I was looking trying to think of a way, is there a way that working with city staff and the parks that we could get some sort of trail or access or park where people in a wheelchair could get them away? You know out back or somewhere where a family could gather you know outside the facility. I realize with the setbacks and all that’s in there but it’s more of the ability of a quality of life. I was thinking well where would I do it? Well in the back you can’t do it. I was thinking well you have a sunroom. Well you have the drop off there with the garages. You follow where I’m going? Elizabeth Wright: Absolutely. Just to be clear we love the outdoors and I know that one of the things that we’re actually doing in Lakeville to that end is we’re, we recently got approval to build basically an English garden on another part of the property that I own down there and for Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 16 us it’s important to allow certain gathering areas and we would love to work with the City and parks and everybody else to be able to find that spot on this property to make that work. McGonagill: Maybe it’s access into the park itself because you’re not far off. Elizabeth Wright: Yeah. McGonagill: So I would just ask the staff to work with parks and see what we do here because people that are here will want it. I mean particularly if there is a family member there and you’re living here. You’ll spend a lot of time there and you want to get out or maybe you just want to get out and walk and refresh yourself so you can go back and care for them and I would just really encourage that to be found. Elizabeth Wright: We would love that. Tietz: Mr. Chairman? Weick: Yep. Tietz: Seeing that the landscape plan is up, just a question and maybe there’s reasoning behind it but looks like it’s all foundation and edge planting. Has that been done for a purpose? I mean the building is rimmed with plant material and your list looks like a great list of plant material and Jill’s our environmental and forester in the city made some great comments that, a comment came in about the removal of trees and I think Jill made a good comment and certainly agree with all the trees but I’m just, it just strikes me as everything is tight to edges. Patrick Sarver: Well there’s a couple reasons for that. There’s a certain calculations that are required by the ordinance that we’re trying to satisfy with the perimeter planting and the amount of shrubs and treatments that we have so in order to meet the required plantings, obviously we wanted screening around the south side. Or on the west side. Or on the building. It has a requirement for planting around the foundation. There’s likely that we’re probably going to plant more trees than we might be showing currently so these folks love planting trees so having something that compliments the wooded area. Tietz: I’m just not sure, do our ordinances require foundation planting? I’ve never seen that on any plans that we’ve ever reviewed. That is just tight to the building and completely around. You know the numbers of and species you certainly could do some mass plantings and I’m just wondering too in this naturalization of that buffer area, from the architectural rendering obviously the architectural is a better rendering than the site rendering but on that back side in this light green or yellow area you could plant large or a lot of trees that are appropriate for the environment and do something for visual interest on that north side and replace on the requirements for trees in that zone. Just a thought. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 17 Patrick Sarver: We will likely take you up on that. Again it’s the, the planting around the perimeter is where we started from and then trying to keep as many views open into that space as possible. The light yellow is meant to be a low maintenance native planting. Tietz: I think you can plant in that buffer zone. Patrick Sarver: Oh yeah. Tietz: Yeah. We were dealing with that with The Park too and encouraging Lennar to do something in those edge areas as opposed to just marching down the streets. Patrick Sarver: We’ll be happy to work out with the, I’ll reach out to the Forester and see if there’s opportunities… Tietz: And Jill had good comments and I think just go from there. Thanks. Patrick Sarver: Great, thank you. McGonagill: George is there any, from the County or wherever it would be to ever consider, I hope they don’t, consider that they’re going to put a roundabout at that intersection of Audubon? I know there’s a stop sign which I like because with senior drivers which would be going in and out of there visiting, I like having a stop sign. People can stop and assess what’s happening instead of somebody whipping around that roundabout. Ripping around a roundabout and somebody being surprised. Bender: Not that I’m aware of but I think it’s too close to Trunk Highway 5 there for that. McGonagill: To happen. Bender: For that to actually be there. There is a roundabout proposed down at Galpin. McGonagill: Correct, right. I was just thinking if you’re thinking okay being in facilities like this, knowing how people drive in and out of then they have a lot on their mind. They’re not really looking, zap you know somebody comes whipping around there. Just a question. Weick: Do you have some questions? Skistad: I’m just wondering, I’m wondering have you guys heard from the neighbor? Any concerns from that neighbor. Is that the tree email or the email that came? Aanenson: Jill did address that comment. Skistad: Is that her? Is that the neighbor? Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 18 Aanenson: Yes. Skistad: From that, okay. Joy Gorra: I have some questions. I didn’t know if it was my turn. Weick: We will get to you. I promise. Joy Gorra: Okay. Skistad: So technically there’s only supposed to be one house on this lot? I mean what is rural residential district typically? Al-Jaff: It’s one unit per 10 acres and as far as densities go it is minimum 2 ½ acres. Does that answer? Skistad: So what is the acreage on that, the person lives to the west of it? Tietz: Well that’s the Gorra property. Al-Jaff: It’s essentially more than that. Tietz: It’s 100 acres. Al-Jaff: Yeah at least. Skistad: Is that, okay. So that goes all the way. Al-Jaff: And the owner of the property is here. Skistad: Okay. Al-Jaff: And the comment dealing with the removal of the tree, the email that we received is actually from a townhouse development that is to the west of the Gorra’s property. Skistad: So is that property that they own to the west is that all the way to those townhouses? That whole entire and the City has that, it’s zoned rural residential Aanenson: It’s guided for high density and medium density. Both. So when they come in they’d have to have a plan that shows that it’s consistent with the guiding in the future. The reason it’s zone rural residential right now is because there’s no use on the property. If you were to rezone it they’d be paying higher taxes on the property. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 19 McGonagill: I’m done. Weick: Do you have further? Take your time. Skistad: I think I got most of them answered here by other people. I guess the only other question I had really was how far, and I just can’t tell from the maps. Approximately how far is to the other house to this location? Do you have any idea what that is? Al-Jaff: The Gorra house. Skistad: I mean is it flat there? I should, I didn’t realize this was the one that was coming up. I didn’t go out there to look at it. Other than seeing it the property along 78th Street. Al-Jaff: You won’t be able to see the house from this property. Skistad: You won’t be able to see it from this property because it’s far enough. Al-Jaff: Correct. Skistad: Okay. And this is a lower elevation. Is this property, it’s kind of the elevation. Al-Jaff: The elevation of this site sits higher than the Gorra property. Tietz: Go to the photo. McGonagill: You’ve got to go to the photo. There you go. Al-Jaff: So from here to where the house sits you won’t be able to, this entire area is completely wooded. Skistad: Okay. Al-Jaff: So there is no visual, direct visual access to the homes and the building will be at the highest point of the roof it’s 29 feet so you really won’t be able to. Skistad: Well it’s a little bit over two stories essentially. Al-Jaff: Correct. Skistad: That’s all of it. Everyone else answered my questions. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 20 Weick: Okay. One more round of possible questions. Okay hearing none thank you. Thank you very much for your presentation and for answering all of our questions. At this time I will open the public hearing for input. Anyone wishing to come forward may do so at this time. Just I would remind you to please state your name and address so that we can add that to the record. Thank you and welcome. Joy Gorra: Well thank you. I’m Joy Gorra. The neighbor to the west. I too am in long term residential care. The location that they selected is a wonderful spot for what they are proposing. If you’ve been in an assisted living in Minnesota you have only been in one. Each assisted living is uniquely different depending on the ownership. That is how they’re going to be running their facility. I am assuming Elizabeth will be running her Lakeville and her Chanhassen the same. I understand her facility to be a locked down unit for strictly memory care. The model is changing a lot where they’re weaving dementia care and, or clients with independent residents. They seem to flourish very well that way. Each owner can operate it completely different but moving forward maybe her model changes or maybe that owner changes. But right now what she has designed is perfect for her residents. For her community. It’s great looking at it from the north and probably from the west and probably from the east but when you look forward to the south there is a big problem. I don’t see it so much her problem but I see the problem for Chanhassen. As we move forward with our direction to expand senior housing with services the City needs to keep in mind you are serving a vulnerable population and you really want to safeguard that vulnerable population. Last year roughly about this time there was a vulnerable adult, independent in his electrical scooter who would be zipping down on the shoulder of a highway. Nothing busy like Highway 5 but still very busy and it was dark and he would be hit by a car and a month later would die. So as these facilities come up in Chanhassen we need to be very careful on how we lay things out with regard to a road. Owners who have these facilities having them next to a busy street is really quite ideal. Everybody knows where your place is. People living in that facility they enjoy watching activity and here what Elizabeth is proposing they’ve got the best of both worlds. They’ve got the quiet serene view or they can be looking out at Highway 5, Paisley Park watching activity. Assuming maybe her facility changes I believe it’d be very, very nice if we could have another overpass possibly over Highway 5 also servicing Paisley Park. I don’t know just an idea but as you plan for Chanhassen in the future and making a home for vulnerable adults please keep that in mind that if not done properly there could be injury and again with the, with some of these clients you’ve got dementia that might be out there but even if they don’t have dementia, again in a motorized scooter they can be hurt so I would welcome them as my next door neighbor. I do not want water. I do not want a new pond on my property but I believe they would be a great neighbor. A good asset to Lake Ann but again you need to make sure you’ve looked at the whole picture. Thank you. Weick: Thanks for coming tonight. Ahmet: I’d like to comment tonight. Weick: Yes please. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 21 Ahmet: My name is Ahmet. I’m working with my wife. I’m the consultant to my wife construction company. I have no ownership in the Moments or in the construction company. However I’m helping to lead her construction. So when Elizabeth went to put the memory care in a very difficult spot in Lakeville, right on 46th and 35W, the same question were arose by the Planning Commission and other people. It’s close to the highway. How do you bring greenery to these lots and how do you build something that is extraordinary so I’d like to tell you something it’s amazing story. So when Elizabeth start, put her business together a gentleman by the name of Don Hussey. Don Hussey is the managing director of the Ziegler Group. It’s the largest senior lender in America. When he saw Elizabeth’s operation and the building after she created it and her company build it he told, quote unquote, you have one of the top 5 memory care in the country. In the country and that was her first memory care. Unanimously the City of Lakeville approved her second expansion that is 60 memory care and 80,000 square feet they’re going to create a campus. Elizabeth spent in Lakeville a million dollar to create an English garden that she took and she’s copying the Lord Jacob’s and if you look at, Google it and see English garden, it is amazing. We plant 70 trees that are 10 foot tall. We’re planning to plant over 200 trees here. Your idea of having a trail and having it excellence this is exactly Elizabeth’s vision and we’re going to work with the city planning and everybody in Chanhassen to be able to deliver the dreams and the needs of the city in this community. And we understand the importance that the City on the environment, on greenery, on trees, that’s exactly what we would like to do there and that’s exactly what we’re going to do here. Weick: Thank you. Ahmet: Thank you. Weick: Thank you that’s a great perspective. Can you come back Ms. Gorra? We just had a question and I know that’s unconventional. McGonagill: It was just unclear to me and thank you for coming up. Is there anything when you were talking through this that you would suggest that we need to do other than what you see to have it safe? I agree with you. I had a friend of the family hit in a scooter. Get what you’re saying. Is there anything else that you can see that we need to consider other than it has security. It is memory care. Keep it that way. Joy Gorra: Well some of the good things that Chanhassen has here is, you have that walking and bike trail and then you have West 78th Street and then you have a ditch and then you have Highway 5 but you know facilities, their staff are trained. You can’t, if you’ve got independent staff that can, I mean residents that can come and go you can’t really restrain them. McGonagill: No. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 22 Joy Gorra: You know maybe a certain crosswalk but with Highway 5 the only thing I can see is going over. McGonagill: But this isn’t going to be independent residents. These are. Joy Gorra: Right, right. McGonagill: What I would say confined and I think you intend to keep them that way. Keep that kind of structure right? Business model. Elizabeth Wright: Memory care. McGonagill: Excuse me? Elizabeth Wright: Memory care only. McGonagill: Memory care only, okay. Alright thank you. Joy Gorra: Yep. Weick: Thank you. And with that I will close the public hearing portion of tonight’s item and open the item for commission member comments and/or appropriate motions. Tietz: No, looks good. McGonagill: Looks good, looks fine. Tietz: Go for it. Weick: Yeah I would only moderately echo that. I, as I read this on my own and I’m really familiar with this site, it’s, I come back to a common refrain of mine that sometimes, sometimes things aren’t buildable. I saw that a lot especially with some of the infill that we do with homes. You know I wish the use of this was like a super center or something that would make me feel better about saying you know no. But it’s not. I mean it’s an awesome business case and it’s a beautiful property and it’s the right thing for the city. I’m struggling myself with you know it’s built right up to the parking lot. It’s built over the wetland really. And when you think about protecting the wetlands, those are a couple things I have trouble putting behind. I love the use but those are two things that stand out to me. As food for thought. McGonagill: Well I understand what you’re saying. I love the use. I love the setting. What I was thinking because I go up and down that trail a lot and it is tight. I agree with you. But at the same time as I think about it, having a quality place for memory care for people that you can go Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 23 there and particularly if they can work with the parks and have access for someone to take a loved one and be around them, it’s huge for that benefit. Weick: Yeah I’m with you. McGonagill: And for, yes it’s a compromise. What we’re talking about to some degree but I think it’s compromising in the right direction for a quality of life of future Chanhassen residents whether they realize they’re here or not. Weick: Yeah. McGonagill: But for their families particularly I think it can be done right it can be a very comforting place for people to know the family is taken care of. For a lot of different reasons but there’s hotels close by. People can come stay if they’re out of town. You come visit the family member or there’s if you want to go out and get them something to help the room there’s shops here in Chan. It’s really, I just, I like it and maybe for that, yeah there’s hair on it. I agree with you but we’re protecting Lake Riley. It’s a good addition to the side of the park. It’s like I, that’s why I’m in favor of it. And I’m a hard sell. Weick: I know you are. I know you are, yes. Skistad: Well I like the design of the building. I think that’s very well done. That’s probably the best design that I think we’ve seen especially the first design. I guess it’s the maintenance question that George brought up that’s concerning. Aanenson: Just to be clear that is a condition of approval so those things have to be met so the only way they could advance is if they met those conditions so that’s what you would be approving that they had to meet those. Weick: In regards to maintenance and things like that. Aanenson: Well the 5 foot. The 5 foot rear, those are conditions of approval so they would have to meet that, yep. Al-Jaff: They would also need to meet the watershed district requirements as far as the buffer. So a lot of these things that you’re raising as issues have been discussed by staff. We agree with you and by averaging the buffer you are maintaining and meeting the intent of the ordinance and one of the things I mentioned at the beginning, intent versus literal interpretation of the ordinance. Aanenson: I just wanted to add. So what we heard, that’s why I asked the developer to give their talk first is what they’ve already worked to try to modify those conditions. They’re still Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 24 about watershed, amount of retaining the amount of water which they need to go through a process so they’ll have to do all that to get it approved so just to be clear on that. Weick: Yep. But even the 5 feet is a compromise right? I mean that’s not, that’s not code. I mean that’s a variance. McGonagill: It’s a variance. Weick: It’s a variance right? Al-Jaff: That was a variance. Weick: Okay. Bender: It’s a variance from 30 feet. Randall: It’s like, you know looking at the property I think it’s a, the environmental impact. This is a good use for any kind of impact it’s going to have. I looked at the floorplans of the building. It would be very hard to convert that into like apartments down the road or that type of thing where you’d have more traffic going in and out where the impact on the environment would be higher so I mean it’s built to stay and it’s probably going to stay it’s use that it has right now even 20-30-40 years down the road and I think it’s a good thing to have in Chan and it’s a great spot to have that too so I’ll be voting in favor of a rezoning. Weick: I know for fear of sounding heartless, you know I mean I’ve sat through these though where we’ve told homeowners you know who want to build big houses on small property that hey just you know cut out a bedroom or make it a two car garage or you know don’t put this or that in there so we’re pretty strict in those cases and I understand that this is a, again it’s a wonderful use and I would not be disappointed to see this built but thinking you know sort of procedurally as we’ve talked through cases that just, I’m explaining ultimately where my vote would lie which is against it because of those reasons. I do see an importance in being consistent with putting things that are just generally too large on properties that are generally too small. McGonagill: I understand. That’s your conviction so that’s fine. Weick: Okay. Skistad: In looking at the whole, the property next to it and knowing what we just did at the Park, you know I’m just envisioning what would that property be at some point. You know how much density do we plan to put there. Weick: We certainly will increase it right. I mean that’s our plan is to increase it. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 25 Aanenson: Oh yeah. Yep. Weick: I mean that’s. Skistad: So if we continue to overrun sections of property I think we’re going to, you know we’re also potentially endangering Lake Ann at some point. McGonagill: It’s a good point but you’re voting on a variance for this particular piece of property and not for what could be. Skistad: I realize that. McGonagill: So that’s hard to balance that out which I appreciate the Commissioner your thoughts but as I’ve been coached by others before we have to, you know what’s in front of you is what you vote on and I go okay, I get it. Weick: And I appreciate that. Tietz: I’ll make a motion. Weick: Please do. Tietz: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning of the property from Rural Residential District to High Density Residential District (R-16). Lot consolidation and the site plan review with variances for the construction of a 48 unit continuing care retirement facility, The Moments of Chanhassen as shown on plans dated January 6, 2020, subject to the conditions and approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision, and yeah, Decision Recommendation. Decision is, why is that Decision Recommendation? Weick: Thank you Commissioner Tietz. We have a valid motion. Do we have a second? McGonagill: I will second. Weick: We have a second from Commissioner McGonagill. Any final comment before we vote? Seeing none. Tietz moved, McGonagill seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case #2020-02 to rezone 3.5 acres of property from RR, Rural Residential District to R-16, High Density Residential District and adoption of the Findings of Fact. All voted in favor except for Wieck and Skistad who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 26 Tietz moved, McGonagill seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the site plan consisting of a 65,000 square-foot continuing care facility with wetland and front yard setback variances, Planning Case #2020-2 for The Moments of Chanhassen as shown in plans dated January 6, 2020, and including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation, and subject to the following conditions: Engineering 1. A turning movement analysis utilizing the largest anticipated design vehicle shall be provided to ensure there is adequate spacing and no conflicts within the required turnaround, the driveway entrance/exit, and with the traffic control devices located on West 78th Street (raised median, pavement striping, etc.) prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. An updated existing condition survey shall be submitted with revised plans that includes the full extents of the construction limits for review and approval by the city prior to recording of the Site Plan Agreement. 3. Plans shall be updated to provide a planting and revegetation plan specific for grading within the wetland buffer prior to the commencement of grading operations. 4. Plans shall illustrate the location of the required wetland buffer monumentation prior to issuance of building permits. 5. A minimum 5-foot setback shall be adhered to at all times along the wetland buffer and plans shall be resubmitted for review and approval by the city prior to recording of the Site Plan Agreement. 6. Bottom wall elevations and top of wall elevations for the entire wall section of all five (5) retaining walls shall be provided prior to the commencement of grading activities. 7. Revisions and updates to the erosion control plans and SWPPP shall be submitted to meet the requirements of the NPDES Construction Permit and Sec. 19-145 of City Code prior to the commencement of grading activities. This will include, but is not limited to: updated language in the SWPPP to be site specific and not general language pulled directly from the permit; BMPs to protect planned infiltration/filtration areas; provide redundant (double) perimeter sediment controls when a surface water is located within 50 feet of the project’s earth disturbances; location of stock pile for grading and for topsoil, haul routes, etc. 8. The applicant shall submit updated plans and modeling to provide for the required abstraction and obtain a RPBCWD permit prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The applicant shall provide an operation and maintenance plan (O&M) for the private stormwater BMPs. The O&M of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity and Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 27 must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, to be recorded against the benefiting properties, prior to building permits being issued. 10. Plans shall be resubmitted to achieve one wet tap location for a dual combined domestic and fire water service line, for review and approval by the city, prior to issuance of building permits. 11. Any redundant gate valves past the wet tap location will be owned and maintained by the property owner, and shall be located wholly on the private property. 12. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure and submit proof that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, RPBCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, etc.). 13. The applicant will be required to enter into a maintenance agreement with the city for the proposed inside drop within MCES’ manhole prior to issuance of building permits. 14. All proposed sanitary sewer lines will be privately owned and maintained, thus no manholes shall be located within public right-of-way. Plans shall be updated and resubmitted for review and approval by the city prior to issuance of building permits. Environmental Resources 1. The applicant shall remove the existing trees within the grading limits along the west property line. Fire Marshal 1. Show any lower level exit doors and egress paths outdoors away from the building. This type of development cannot omit lower level exit doors. Planning 1. All rooftop and ground equipment must be screened from views. 2. The applicant must prepare a lighting plan and include photometrics. Light levels for site lighting shall be no more than one-half foot candle at the project perimeter property line. This does not apply to street lighting. The applicant has not submitted a light fixture design. This fixture must be downcast and the light cut off at a 90-degree angle. The city code requires all fixtures be shielded. 3. Approval of the site plan applications is contingent upon approval of the rezoning and variances. Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 28 4. The monument sign may not exceed 24 square feet in area nor be higher than five feet. The sign shall be located 10 feet from the property line. A sign permit is required before construction of the sign. 5. Sign illumination and design shall comply with ordinance. 6. Recycling space and other solid waste collection space should be contained within the same enclosure as the trash. 7. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon consolidation of the two parcels into a single zoning lot. All voted in favor except for Weick and Skistad who opposed and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. Weick: Two nays so this item passes 3 to 2 and will be moved forward to the City Council on February 24th. Thank you to everyone who presented. The developer. The City. The Planning Commission. City Engineer. Great conversation. Difficult sometimes to get our hands around what some of this means for our city but it’s a very important addition to our city. McGonagill: Nice package Sharmeen by the way. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Randall noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 21, 2020 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: Thank you, city council update. Just a couple. The second phase for The Park was approved by the City Council. They’re working through some of their issues still on that. They’re also, we’ve been discussing with the City Council a PUD amendment for Paisley Park. How we’ve been working through their permitting for activities. They want to consider doing more outdoor events so we’re working on that. And then also they extended, there’s a non- conforming use extension for a garage and that’s Steve Hansen’s building which is right behind the license center there so that’s an older building. Kind of an industrial building. When we look at the downtown plan those buildings could ultimately change over. There’s kind of quasi industrial back there if you go back behind the license center so we extended that one. There hasn’t been any activity there right now but, so that’s kind of the City Council update. We did have a meeting with Avienda. They’re interested in getting the grading going so I have them back on the agenda. They’ll be back for a work session with the City Council and then they will be working on the grading plan. They’re working with engineering on that now. Kind of presenting when they’re done with their plans and then they’ll come back and do a PUD amendment and we’ll notice that. Again the housing is pretty solid what they’ve got there. As I Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 29 mentioned earlier there will be some senior coops. Some senior housing and some straight up apartments in there too. Maybe about 500 units and then, so I think what they’re looking at what that interior mix is and you have the retail in there and then the office and some restaurants but I think they’re looking at some other things but they haven’t tipped their card on that yet. I think they’ll save that for the City Council meeting. But once they decide that then we’ll come back through. Won’t really affect the AUAR. I don’t think the overall trips are going to change. The directional traffic but it will require public input on some of those changes so you’ll have a chance to look at that. And then I just wanted to share one other thing. So there will be a meeting next, 2 weeks from tonight and then at that meeting we just have a site plan approval or a sign plan for Chapel Hill. A sign variance. Other than that we’ll be interviewing commission candidates so we’ll move into the Fountain Conference Room for that. Weick: Planning Commission candidates? Aanenson: Planning Commission candidates. Weick: For us? Aanenson: Yeah. Yep. So you make a recommendation to City Council. We do it every year so. Randall: Who’s term is that on? Aanenson: I don’t know, John didn’t, if he’s going to apply or not. Are you reapplying? Didn’t look like it. I know right? I think someone needs to work on that. So yes I think there’s 3, 3 potentially 3 or 4 you’ll be interviewing so plan on that. So it will be an abbreviated meeting and then we’ll go into that and then again on March 3rd we do not have a meeting because that is the Presidential Primary night so there will not be a meeting so everybody gets that week off. And Doug will be gone next meeting too so those of you that are here for the interviews that would be great. So we’ll give you. Randall: Will there be… Aanenson: Pardon me? Randall: Is dinner provided? Aanenson: No, we will at the work session though. Now that one in April when we have the first meeting and everybody will have dinner at that meeting. And actually we’ve got a few things. We’ll have the council will be approving the Comp Plan so we’re going to spend some time going back through it again. Just like tonight we talked a little bit about the housing section. We’ll talk about that. Some of the land uses. Some other changes or, not changes but some of the demographics and stuff like that that we’re looking at so kind of embedded in that as Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 30 projects come through. And then one of the things you requested, some of the other commissions goals and policies so we’ll have those compiled too so you can look through what the other commissions are doing too so that one will be April 7th and that one we’ll have dinner and we’ll start at 6:00 but I’ll give you notice again on that so. We do have a subdivision potentially in March and then the Paisley Park PUD amendment so you’ll get more details on that. And then there’s another existing large lot subdivision that’s going to subdivide. There’s two homes and they’re going to try to make it into three so. So some things floating out there but that’s what’s landed so far so that’s all I have. Skistad: When is the Avienda work session? For the council. I might want to sit on that. Aanenson: Yeah I’ll shoot you an email on that. I put it under council calendar but I don’t have that right in front of me. Skistad: And I actually am going to be gone next meeting. Aanenson: That’s good to know. Skistad: I wasn’t positive if I was going to be gone. Aanenson: That’s the 18th. Skistad: Yeah. Aanenson: Perfect okay. I’ll make sure we have a quorum if anybody else is going to be gone. Weick: It’d be the 4 of us remaining though right? Aanenson: The 18th. Weick: That’s all we have right? Aanenson: Yeah we have to have 4 yeah. Yeah because Doug will be gone. So there’s 2 gone. Weick: And Mark will be gone right? Aanenson: Yep, yep so it takes the 4 of you. Yep. You’ll be here on the 18th? February. Randall: Yeah. Aanenson: Okay perfect. Randall: I am going to be gone April 21st. That’s not the work session is it? Chanhassen Planning Commission – February 4, 2020 31 Aanenson: No. April 7th correct. Yep. Randall: Maybe we should try to do food from some of the various restaurants in town. Aanenson: It’d be great huh? McGonagill: I think we should. Aanenson: Alright that’s all I had. I’m going to step out in the hall for a second. Weick: Is this the Lyman Boulevard thing? Bender: Yep. So I’m planning on presenting to you a quick update on. Weick: One time out though. I think we’re going to adjourn and do this off the record. I think that, at least that’s what the, it’s what the agenda says and that’s sort of the signal I’m getting as well so I will, so we’ll have it as an open discussion after adjournment. So I accept a motion to adjourn. Skistad moved, Randall seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020­XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05: Accept Feasibility Report; Call Public Hearing Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: F.3. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­05 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05 and calls for a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) for consultant services for the project.  On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for professional services for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project. On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Associates and authorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project. On February 11, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project with the public.  Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project. DISCUSSION The scope of the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas (reference attached 2020 street rehabilitation map) with a collection of streets in each neighborhood to be rehabilitated for a combined total of roughly seven miles of roadway.  All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need of roadway pavement rehabilitation.  The City's 5­year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) finalized last November identified these roads should be completed in 2020 as mill and overlay projects. Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shown in Figures 1­7 (reference attachment). The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads built­out between 1988 and 1992. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05: Accept FeasibilityReport; Call Public HearingSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: F.3.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­05PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05 andcalls for a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On February 11, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project withthe public.  Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.DISCUSSIONThe scope of the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas (reference attached2020 street rehabilitation map) with a collection of streets in each neighborhood to be rehabilitated for a combinedtotal of roughly seven miles of roadway.  All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need ofroadway pavement rehabilitation.  The City's 5­year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) finalized last Novemberidentified these roads should be completed in 2020 as mill and overlay projects.Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shownin Figures 1­7 (reference attachment). The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads built­out between 1988 and 1992. The Redwing Lane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads built­out in 1980 The Trappers Pass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately three miles of roads built­out between 1985 and 1994. The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads built­out in 1978. The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101 as well, with approximately 0.6 miles of road built­out between 1991 and 1992. The Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 with approximately one mile of roads built­out in 1986. None of these roads were originally built to current city standards and have had major rehabilitation performed after the original urbanized street construction (only maintenance activities such as crack sealing, patching, and seal coats). The city will utilize funds collected for pavement management (levy, franchise fee, and revolving assessment fund) and special assessments to finance the street improvements.  Per the city’s assessment practice, 40% of the street costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.  In addition, city utility funds will be used for funding of the utility improvements as required. An RFP for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineering department for the Trappers Pass, Marsh Drive, Redwing Lane, and Lake Lucy Road areas.  American Engineering Testing, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare the geotechnical report for these project areas.  The city had previously issued an RFP and had a geotechnical report prepared for the Kurvers Point and Choctaw Circle areas.  This report was prepared by Braun Intertec in the Fall of 2018.  The city conducted the geotechnical assessment and pavement evaluation to aid in the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs for the project. Kimley­Horn was provided the geotechnical reports for the roadways in the project scope to incorporate with the feasibility study and subsequent design.  Based on the geotechnical reports and the feasibility study, four of the six areas should be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation (FDR) technique in lieu of a mill and overlay.  This is primarily based on the existing OCI, existing pavement thicknesses and condition, and the supporting soils.  The other two areas (Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane) are recommended to be a mill and overlay.   The cost difference between the recommended rehabilitation techniques (FDR vs a mill and overlay) creates a budget shortfall for this project.  Staff is recommending three of the six areas be completed in 2020 (Trapper's Pass, Choctaw Circle, and Redwing Lane) in order to stay within the budgeted amount in the CIP.  This results in the deferral of the remaining three areas (Kurvers Point, Marsh Drive, and Lake Lucy Road) which would be completed in 2021 pending a comparitive review of all of the 2021 programmed areas. As with any road rehabilitation project, minor spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are planned.  The majority of the roadways within the project areas do not have an existing trail or sidewalk.  All pedestrian ramps are typically brought into compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.  In the case of this project, the existing pedestrian ramps in the project areas have already been brought into compliance.  Hence, no pedestrian ramps are included as part of the project. City staff performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need for improvements.  All identified needs will be incorporated into the project.  Kimley­Horn evaluated each neighborhood area for potential flooding during a 100­year event at all emergency overflows (EOF) for roadway low points and stormwater ponds.  The results for each area are summarized in the feasibility study and any identified concerns will be addressed in the final design.  A number of comments from the open house hosted on February 11, 2020, were also related to drainage concerns.  As appropriate, these concerns will also be addressed in the final design.   As appropriate, any other comments received during the open house were factored into the preliminary design and are included in the feasibility report.  Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer are not necessary.  The valves on the watermain are planned to be CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05: Accept FeasibilityReport; Call Public HearingSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: F.3.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­05PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05 andcalls for a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On February 11, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project withthe public.  Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.DISCUSSIONThe scope of the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas (reference attached2020 street rehabilitation map) with a collection of streets in each neighborhood to be rehabilitated for a combinedtotal of roughly seven miles of roadway.  All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need ofroadway pavement rehabilitation.  The City's 5­year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) finalized last Novemberidentified these roads should be completed in 2020 as mill and overlay projects.Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shownin Figures 1­7 (reference attachment).The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads built­outbetween 1988 and 1992.The Redwing Lane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads built­out in1980The Trappers Pass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately three milesof roads built­out between 1985 and 1994.The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads built­out in 1978.The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101 as well, with approximately 0.6 miles of road built­outbetween 1991 and 1992.The Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 with approximately one mile of roadsbuilt­out in 1986.None of these roads were originally built to current city standards and have had major rehabilitation performed afterthe original urbanized street construction (only maintenance activities such as crack sealing, patching, and seal coats).The city will utilize funds collected for pavement management (levy, franchise fee, and revolving assessment fund) andspecial assessments to finance the street improvements.  Per the city’s assessment practice, 40% of the street costs areproposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.  In addition, city utility funds will be used for funding of theutility improvements as required.An RFP for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineeringdepartment for the Trappers Pass, Marsh Drive, Redwing Lane, and Lake Lucy Road areas.  American EngineeringTesting, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare the geotechnical report for these project areas.  The city hadpreviously issued an RFP and had a geotechnical report prepared for the Kurvers Point and Choctaw Circle areas. This report was prepared by Braun Intertec in the Fall of 2018.  The city conducted the geotechnical assessment andpavement evaluation to aid in the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs for the project.Kimley­Horn was provided the geotechnical reports for the roadways in the project scope to incorporate with thefeasibility study and subsequent design.  Based on the geotechnical reports and the feasibility study, four of the six areasshould be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation (FDR) technique in lieu of a mill and overlay.  This is primarily basedon the existing OCI, existing pavement thicknesses and condition, and the supporting soils.  The other two areas(Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane) are recommended to be a mill and overlay.  The cost difference between the recommended rehabilitation techniques (FDR vs a mill and overlay) creates a budgetshortfall for this project.  Staff is recommending three of the six areas be completed in 2020 (Trapper's Pass, ChoctawCircle, and Redwing Lane) in order to stay within the budgeted amount in the CIP.  This results in the deferral of theremaining three areas (Kurvers Point, Marsh Drive, and Lake Lucy Road) which would be completed in 2021 pending acomparitive review of all of the 2021 programmed areas.As with any road rehabilitation project, minor spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are planned. The majority of the roadways within the project areas do not have an existing trail or sidewalk.  All pedestrian rampsare typically brought into compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.  In the case of this project, theexisting pedestrian ramps in the project areas have already been brought into compliance.  Hence, no pedestrianramps are included as part of the project.City staff performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need forimprovements.  All identified needs will be incorporated into the project.  Kimley­Horn evaluated each neighborhoodarea for potential flooding during a 100­year event at all emergency overflows (EOF) for roadway low points andstormwater ponds.  The results for each area are summarized in the feasibility study and any identified concerns will beaddressed in the final design.  A number of comments from the open house hosted on February 11, 2020, were alsorelated to drainage concerns.  As appropriate, these concerns will also be addressed in the final design.  As appropriate, any other comments received during the open house were factored into the preliminary design and areincluded in the feasibility report.  Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer are not necessary.  The valves on the watermain are planned to be rehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves.  The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likely to be mild steel.  The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils found in Chanhassen.  Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitary sewer system. The feasibility report also addressed a section of watermain that routes through backyard easements between Lake Lucy Road and Western Drive.  This section connects the watermains in the public right­of­way.  The final design can further investigate if this section of watermain can cost­effectively be eliminated to alleviate maintenance access issues in the future.  Currently, the work is not included as part of the feasibility analysis or costs. Proposed improvements will address current NPDES, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District permit requirements.  Due to there being no new or reconstructed impervious surfaces in the project there are not any triggers for permanent stormwater management rules in either watershed district. Funding A budget for the proposed work has been included in the 2020 CIP for the project to be constructed in 2020.  It was anticipated the budget would need to be reviewed and updated based upon construction cost estimates after the feasibility report was completed.  The feasibility study identifies it would not be feasible to construct the complete scope of the project within the budgeted amount.  Furthermore, the feasibility study identifies three of the areas (Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle, and Redwing Lane) can be completed by the City within the budget limitations.  Funding for the project is proposed to come from the pavement management fund and special assessments to benefiting properties for the street improvement costs and city utility funds as required. The preliminary special assessments for the three areas identified as feasible to be completed are as follows: Redwing Lane area:  $1,960 Choctaw Circle area:  $2,160 Trappers Pass area:  $3,048 The Redwing Lane and Choctaw Circle areas will be rehabilitated by a standard mill and overlay technique.  The Trappers Pass area will be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation.  The main difference in the assessment cost is related to that difference. Schedule RECOMMENDATION From an engineering and financing perspective this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective.  Staff recommends the feasibility report be accepted.  Staff also recommends a Public Hearing be authorized and scheduled on April 27, 2020. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, April 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05: Accept FeasibilityReport; Call Public HearingSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: F.3.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­05PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council accepts the feasibility report for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05 andcalls for a public hearing to be held on April 27, 2020.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On February 11, 2020, the Engineering Department hosted an open house to introduce and discuss the project withthe public.  Notifications were sent to residents in the nearby areas who will be affected by the project.DISCUSSIONThe scope of the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas (reference attached2020 street rehabilitation map) with a collection of streets in each neighborhood to be rehabilitated for a combinedtotal of roughly seven miles of roadway.  All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need ofroadway pavement rehabilitation.  The City's 5­year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) finalized last Novemberidentified these roads should be completed in 2020 as mill and overlay projects.Staff utilized the City's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shownin Figures 1­7 (reference attachment).The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads built­outbetween 1988 and 1992.The Redwing Lane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads built­out in1980The Trappers Pass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately three milesof roads built­out between 1985 and 1994.The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads built­out in 1978.The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101 as well, with approximately 0.6 miles of road built­outbetween 1991 and 1992.The Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 with approximately one mile of roadsbuilt­out in 1986.None of these roads were originally built to current city standards and have had major rehabilitation performed afterthe original urbanized street construction (only maintenance activities such as crack sealing, patching, and seal coats).The city will utilize funds collected for pavement management (levy, franchise fee, and revolving assessment fund) andspecial assessments to finance the street improvements.  Per the city’s assessment practice, 40% of the street costs areproposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.  In addition, city utility funds will be used for funding of theutility improvements as required.An RFP for a geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation was prepared and distributed by the Engineeringdepartment for the Trappers Pass, Marsh Drive, Redwing Lane, and Lake Lucy Road areas.  American EngineeringTesting, Inc. was hired to perform the work and prepare the geotechnical report for these project areas.  The city hadpreviously issued an RFP and had a geotechnical report prepared for the Kurvers Point and Choctaw Circle areas. This report was prepared by Braun Intertec in the Fall of 2018.  The city conducted the geotechnical assessment andpavement evaluation to aid in the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs for the project.Kimley­Horn was provided the geotechnical reports for the roadways in the project scope to incorporate with thefeasibility study and subsequent design.  Based on the geotechnical reports and the feasibility study, four of the six areasshould be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation (FDR) technique in lieu of a mill and overlay.  This is primarily basedon the existing OCI, existing pavement thicknesses and condition, and the supporting soils.  The other two areas(Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane) are recommended to be a mill and overlay.  The cost difference between the recommended rehabilitation techniques (FDR vs a mill and overlay) creates a budgetshortfall for this project.  Staff is recommending three of the six areas be completed in 2020 (Trapper's Pass, ChoctawCircle, and Redwing Lane) in order to stay within the budgeted amount in the CIP.  This results in the deferral of theremaining three areas (Kurvers Point, Marsh Drive, and Lake Lucy Road) which would be completed in 2021 pending acomparitive review of all of the 2021 programmed areas.As with any road rehabilitation project, minor spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are planned. The majority of the roadways within the project areas do not have an existing trail or sidewalk.  All pedestrian rampsare typically brought into compliance in accordance with the ADA transition plan.  In the case of this project, theexisting pedestrian ramps in the project areas have already been brought into compliance.  Hence, no pedestrianramps are included as part of the project.City staff performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need forimprovements.  All identified needs will be incorporated into the project.  Kimley­Horn evaluated each neighborhoodarea for potential flooding during a 100­year event at all emergency overflows (EOF) for roadway low points andstormwater ponds.  The results for each area are summarized in the feasibility study and any identified concerns will beaddressed in the final design.  A number of comments from the open house hosted on February 11, 2020, were alsorelated to drainage concerns.  As appropriate, these concerns will also be addressed in the final design.  As appropriate, any other comments received during the open house were factored into the preliminary design and areincluded in the feasibility report. Major replacement of watermain and sanitary sewer are not necessary.  The valves on the watermain are planned to berehabilitated by changing out the bolting on the valves.  The age of the original installation indicates the bolting is likely tobe mild steel.  The bolts will be replaced with stainless steel to protect them long term from the corrosive soils found inChanhassen.  Minor repairs primarily related to reducing infiltration and inflow are recommended for the sanitary sewersystem.The feasibility report also addressed a section of watermain that routes through backyard easements between Lake LucyRoad and Western Drive.  This section connects the watermains in the public right­of­way.  The final design can furtherinvestigate if this section of watermain can cost­effectively be eliminated to alleviate maintenance access issues in thefuture.  Currently, the work is not included as part of the feasibility analysis or costs.Proposed improvements will address current NPDES, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and Riley Purgatory BluffCreek Watershed District permit requirements.  Due to there being no new or reconstructed impervious surfaces in theproject there are not any triggers for permanent stormwater management rules in either watershed district.FundingA budget for the proposed work has been included in the 2020 CIP for the project to be constructed in 2020.  It wasanticipated the budget would need to be reviewed and updated based upon construction cost estimates after thefeasibility report was completed.  The feasibility study identifies it would not be feasible to construct the completescope of the project within the budgeted amount.  Furthermore, the feasibility study identifies three of the areas(Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle, and Redwing Lane) can be completed by the City within the budgetlimitations.  Funding for the project is proposed to come from the pavement management fund and special assessmentsto benefiting properties for the street improvement costs and city utility funds as required.The preliminary special assessments for the three areas identified as feasible to be completed are as follows:Redwing Lane area:  $1,960Choctaw Circle area:  $2,160Trappers Pass area:  $3,048The Redwing Lane and Choctaw Circle areas will be rehabilitated by a standard mill and overlay technique.  TheTrappers Pass area will be rehabilitated by a full depth reclamation.  The main difference in the assessment cost isrelated to that difference.ScheduleRECOMMENDATIONFrom an engineering and financing perspective this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective.  Staff recommends the feasibility report be accepted.  Staff also recommends a Public Hearing be authorized and scheduled on April 27, 2020. ATTACHMENTS: 2020 Rehabilitation Map Figures 1­7 Feasibility Study Geotechnical Report ­ Kurvers Pt & Choctow Cir Geotechnical Report ­ Trappers, Marsh, Redwing, Lake Lucy 5­yr CIP Map 2020 CIP Sheet Resolution "F)³CH ±Lake Lucy LakeAnn Lotus Lake Lake Susan NorthLotusLakePark CarverBeachPark Lake SusanPark LakeAnnPark MeadowGreenPark SouthLotusLakePark PleasantViewPreserve K eber P ondChristmasLake ?©A@?©A@ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ GïWX GqWX GqWX GqWX Date Created: 12/17/2019 Document Path: K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\StreetCIP_2019\LocalPavementRehabProject_2020.mxd Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station 2020 - Mill & Overlay Railroad Rivers Lakes Parks Parcel Boundaries City of Chanhassen 2020 Local Pavement Rehabilitation Project (20-05) µ0 1,600Feet 0 0.25Mile 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Maps (Figures 1-7) Figure 1: Lake Lucy Road Area Map Figure 2: Choctaw Circle Area Map Figure 3: Kurvers Point Road Area Map Figure 4: Marsh Drive Area Map Figure 5: Redwing Lane Area Map Figure 6: Trappers Pass (West) Area Map Figure 7: Trappers Pass (East) Area Map 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION Feasibility Report City Project No. 20-05 City of Chanhassen, Minnesota April 13, 2020 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 4197 April 13, 2020 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: George Bender, P.E. Assistant City Engineer RE: Feasibility Report: City Project 20-05 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council, The enclosed feasibility report has been prepared for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05, as authorized at the January 13, 2020 City Council meeting. This report investigates the rehabilitation of 6.5 miles of roadway throughout the City of Chanhassen including the following general areas: Lake Lucy Road Area, Choctaw Circle Area, Kurvers Point Road Area, Marsh Drive Area, Redwing Lane Area, and Trappers Pass Area. The investigation includes the following: roadway pavement rehabilitation, curb and gutter replacement, storm sewer and drain tile improvements, and minor water main and sanitary sewer improvements for the project areas. The proposed scope of work, estimated costs, financing, and schedule for improvements are detailed in this report. All 6.5 miles of roadway investigated under this report cannot be completed within the available City budget for the project. The recommended improvements were prioritized to make best use of the available budget along with addressing as much of the original project scope as possible. Information utilized in the preparation of this report included utility as-builts, information gathered through field reviews, GIS information, property owner information meetings and discussions with City staff. All available information was reviewed and considered to determine the feasibility of the proposed improvements. We believe that the proposed improvements identified in this report are feasible, that they will benefit the properties in the project area, and that they will benefit the City of Chanhassen. Sincerely, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Chadd Larson, P.E. Project Manager 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION Feasibility Report CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT 20-05 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan, specification 767 Eustis Street or report was prepared by me or under my Suite 100 direct supervision and that I am duly St. Paul, MN 55114 Licensed Professional Engineer under the (651) 645-4197 laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature: __________________________ Chadd Larson, P.E. File: 160511046 Date: April 13, 2020 Lic. No. 41864 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 5 PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ..................................................................................................... 6 Street Improvements .............................................................................................................................. 6 Storm Sewer and Drainage Analysis ...................................................................................................... 7 Lake Lucy Road Area ................................................................................................................... 7 Redwing Lane Area ...................................................................................................................... 7 Choctaw Circle Area ..................................................................................................................... 8 Kurvers Point Road Area .............................................................................................................. 8 Marsh Drive Area .......................................................................................................................... 8 Trappers Pass Area ...................................................................................................................... 8 Sanitary Sewer ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Watermain ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Right-Of-Way and Easement Requirements ........................................................................................ 10 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................... 10 ESTIMATED COSTS .................................................................................................................................. 10 METHOD OF FINANCING .......................................................................................................................... 11 Estimated Assessments ....................................................................................................................... 12 Lake Lucy Road Area ................................................................................................................. 12 Redwing Lane Area .................................................................................................................... 12 Choctaw Circle Area ................................................................................................................... 12 Kurvers Point Road Area ............................................................................................................ 13 Marsh Drive Area ........................................................................................................................ 13 Trappers Pass Area .................................................................................................................... 13 PROJECT SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................................... 13 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................... 14 A PPENDICES APPENDIX A – EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1 – Project Location Map EXHIBIT 2 – Typical Section EXHIBIT 3 – Roadway Improvements EXHIBIT 4 – Utility Improvements EXHIBIT 5 – Proposed Assessment Map APPENDIX B – PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE INFORMATION APPENDIX C – DETAILED COST ESTIMATES APPENDIX D – PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 3 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This feasibility report has been prepared for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05. The originally programmed project includes improvements to approximately 6.5 miles of local roadways within the City of Chanhassen in 6 distinct areas including the Lake Lucy Road Area, Redwing Lane Area, Choctaw Circle Area, Kurvers Point Road Area, Marsh Drive Area, and Trappers Pass Area. The following is a list of improvements evaluated for each area: • Pavement rehabilitation by full depth reclamation (FDR) or mill and overlay. • Spot curb and gutter replacement. • Drain tile replacement and installation. • Storm sewer structure improvements. • Sanitary sewer manhole improvements. • Water main, hydrant, gate valve and valve bolt replacement. The estimated cost for the proposed improvements for all project areas is shown below. These costs include a 5% construction cost contingency and an allowance for indirect costs. A summary of costs for each individual area can be found later in this report. IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED COSTS Roadway Improvements $3,879,000 Storm Sewer Improvements $345,000 Sanitary Sewer Improvements $209,000 Watermain Improvements $340,000 Indirect Costs $300,000 Total Project Improvements $5,073,000 The project cost for all areas combined exceeds the City’s CIP budget for 2020. To reduce the project scope to fit within the City’s CIP budget, it is recommended that the roadway, storm sewer and utility improvements for the Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane area be constructed in 2020. The totaled estimated cost for this reduced project scope is $3,227,000. The improvements to the remaining project areas could be included in a future project. Below is a summary of a financing plan for a project including the three areas identified above. 2020 Financing Source (Trappers Pass Area, Choctaw Circle Area, Redwing Lane Area) Amount General Funds $1,298,768 Surface Water Utility Fund $185,500 Sewer Utility Fund $192,500 Water Utility Fund $600,000 Special Assessments $950,232 Total $3,227,000 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 4 If the City Council chooses to accept this report, we recommend that the following project schedule be followed: City Council Receive Final Feasibility Report Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specs Call Public Hearing April 13, 2020 Public Hearing April 27, 2020 Council Approves Plans and Specs Authorize Advertisement for Bids May 25, 2020 Bid Opening June 19, 2020 Neighborhood Meeting June 30, 2020 Assessment Hearing & Council Awards Contract July 13, 2020 Begin Construction Late July 2020 Substantial Construction Complete November 2020 Based upon the analysis completed as part of this report, the proposed 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05, are feasible, necessary, and cost effective, and would benefit the properties in the project area and the City of Chanhassen. We recommend the following: A. The City Council accepts this feasibility report and authorizes preparation of plans and specifications and calling of a public hearing for improvements to the Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane areas. 5 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 INTRODUCTION On January 13, 2020, the Chanhassen City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05. The proposed project includes improvements to approximately 6.5 miles of local roadways spread throughout the City of Chanhassen. These areas have only received general maintenance since the original street construction as described below: • Lake Lucy Road Area – Approximately 0.7 miles of roadway located east of Powers Blvd (CR 17) constructed between 1988 and 1992. • Redwing Lane Area – Approximately 0.5 miles of roadway located east of Powers Blvd (CR 17) and south of the Lake Lucy Road area constructed in 1980. • Choctaw Circle Area – Approximately 0.4 miles of roadway located west of TH 101 and adjacent to Lotus Lake constructed in 1978. • Kurvers Point Road Area – Approximately 0.6 miles of roadway located west of TH 101 and south of the Choctaw Circle Area constructed between 1991 and 1992. • Marsh Drive Area – Approximately 1.0 mile of roadway located north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 constructed in 1986. • Trappers Pass Area – Approximately 3 miles of roadway located west of TH 101 constructed between 1985 and 1994. No major pavement rehabilitation has been performed on these roadways since their original construction, resulting in deterioration of roadways and a need for improvements. None of these roadways were originally constructed per the City’s current standard street section which includes a sand sub-base and drain tile; however, localized areas of the roadways have had subsequent drainage improvements completed. Minor improvements and repairs that have not already been completed will also be made to public utilities in the project areas. The proposed project includes the following improvements within the six project areas: • Pavement rehabilitation by full depth reclamation (FDR) or mill and overlay. • Spot curb and gutter replacement. • Drain tile replacement and installation. • Storm sewer structure improvements. • Sanitary sewer manhole improvements. • Water main, hydrant, gate valve and valve bolt replacement. A project location map is shown in Appendix A, Exhibit 1. 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 6 PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The original program was to include improvements to six separate neighborhoods throughout the City of Chanhassen. The areas were chosen based on the maintenance history, year they were constructed and pavement condition. The majority of roadways within all project areas do not have trail or sidewalk . There is a limited number of pedestrian ramps located within the project areas. The ramps have previously been upgraded to meet current ADA standards and are not included as part of this project. The following is a summary of the proposed street and utility improvements included as part of this project. STREET IMPROVEMENTS The City evaluates the condition of street pavement based on an overall condition index (OCI) every three years. A street with an OCI less than 49 is considered in poor condition. All project areas identified in the project scope are in poor condition and in need of repairs. A geotechnical report prepared by American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) was completed on March 11, 2020 for the City of Chanhassen. The report evaluated different pavement rehabilitation techniques ranging from mill and overlay to full reconstruction for each project area. Soil borings, pavement cores and ground penetrating radar (GPR) where performed in each project area to determine the existing pavement and underlying soil conditions. The findings from the geotechnical report indicate that full depth reclamation (FDR) is the preferred rehabilitation technique for most of the roadways. Mill and overlay was also determined to be feasible on some of the roadways. FDR consists of creating a recycled aggregate base made up of the existing bituminous pavement and underlying base material. A new section of bituminous is then paved on top of the recycled base. Mill and overlay only removes the upper section of the existing bituminous and does not allow for improvements to the aggregate base material to be made. Based on information in the geotechnical report and coordination with City staff, each area was evaluated for the appropriate pavement rehabilitation method. The same technique will be used on all roads in each individual area to provide a consistent final product and construction efficiency. Full reconstruction of the roadways was considered but eliminated from further evaluation due to available project budget. The following table summarizes the recommended treatment and the range of OCI’s for each project area. PROJECT AREA OCI RANGE MILES OF ROADWAY REHABILITATION TREATMENT Lake Lucy Road Area 13.65 – 36.45 0.7 FDR Redwing Lane Area 38.08 – 67.71 0.5 Mill & Overlay Choctaw Circle Area 24.81 – 44.2 0.4 Mill & Overlay Kurvers Point Road Area 12.98 – 34.29 0.6 FDR Marsh Drive Area 27.64 – 39.67 1.0 FDR Trappers Pass Area 17.39 – 48.54 3.0 FDR Since the pavement reclamation and mill and overlay processes can be completed without removal of curb and gutter, only spot replacement will be necessary to address surface drainage and poor curb and gutter conditions. Replacement locations include areas of observed settlement, utility excavation areas, and as determined by the field engineer during construction. An allocation of 10% of total curb length was included in the cost estimate for spot replacement. The actual limits of replacement will not be determined 7 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 until construction. In 2017, the City performed curb and drain tile replacement in the western half of the Trappers Pass area; therefore, only 5% curb replacement was estimated for this area. The City performed a field review of the drain tile in each project area and provided recommended improvements that are included in the cost estimate for this project. The improvements include replacement of existing drain tile that is in poor condition and adding new drain tile in areas where reoccurring drainage issues have occurred. The proposed roadway improvements are included in Appendix A, Exhibits 2 and 3. STORM S EWER AND DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The project areas fall within two watershed districts; Minnehaha Creek (Lake Lucy Road and Redwing Lane areas) and Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek (Choctaw Circle, Kurvers Point Road, Marsh Drive, and Trappers Pass areas). There are no triggers for stormwater rules in either watershed district for this project because there are no new or reconstructed impervious surfaces. City staff also performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need for improvements in project areas. Since the roadway improvements are limited to pavement rehabilitation measures, it is not feasible to replace the existing storm sewer system. Therefore, a detailed drainage analysis was not performed on each project area. However, each neighborhood was evaluated for potential flooding during a major (100-year event) at emergency overflows (E.O.F.) for roadway low points and stormwater ponds to determine if there were any significant issues. A summary of the assessment is listed below: LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA There are four roadway low points within the project area. The E.O.F. for each low point appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. There are two stormwater ponds in the project area, each pond E.O.F. appears to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. Two open house comments were received for this portion of the project area. A property owner at 6531 Troendel Circle commented that they get ice buildup along the curb and gutter. This area will be further reviewed during the final design and construction for potential curb and gutter replacement to correct any localized drainage issues. A property owner at 861 Vineland Court commented about lack of existing drain tile. This area will be further reviewed during the final design for possible draintile installation. REDWING LANE AREA There are two roadway low points within the project area. The E.O.F. for the low point along Penamint Lane appears to flow north to pond LL 1-26 which means that it does not drain downstream. After visual inspection, the properties north of the low point along Penamint Lane appear at or below the E.O.F elevation. There are three stormwater ponds in the neighborhood. As mentioned above, the E.O.F. for pond LL 1-26 appears to be at or above the elevation of adjacent properties to the north. The E.O.F. for pond LL 1-9 appears close to the property at the southwest corner at Penamint Lane and Penamint Court. Field survey will be performed during the final design process to confirm E.O.F elevations in relation to adjacent properties. An open house comment was received from a property owner at 6840 Redwing Lane regarding areas of infiltration being wet and unusable in the spring. This is a typical 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 8 scenario for infiltration areas during the spring and therefore no improvements are planned to address this comment. CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA There are two roadway low points within the project area, both appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. There are no stormwater ponds in the neighborhood’s portion of the project area. An open house comment was received from a property owner at 6780 Brule Circle regarding backyard drainage from other homes running through their yard. The comment also noted that surface grading had already been performed in an attempt to correct this situation. Localized private property drainage issues are generally outside the scope of this project as any correction of this issue would likely require grading on private property. KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA There are three roadway low points within the project area. Two out of three E.O.F. appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. The E.O.F. at Kurvers Point Road (south of Basswood Circle) runs west towards adjacent properties. Field survey will be performed during the final design process to confirm E.O.F elevations in relation to adjacent properties. There are two stormwater ponds along Kurvers Point Road, each appear to have a functional E.O.F. An open house comment was received from the property owner at 21 Twin Maple Lane regarding various drainage issues. They expressed interested in installing drain tile along the curb adjacent to the property. This area will be further reviewed during final design. MARSH DRIVE AREA There are seven roadway low points within the project area. Five of the seven E.O.F. appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. The E.O.F. at Hidden Lane runs south towards adjacent properties. For the roadway low point along Hidden Court, the adjacent properties appear to be at or below the E.O.F. elevation. Field survey will be performed during the final design process to confirm E.O.F elevations in relation to adjacent properties. There are no stormwater ponds in this neighborhood’s portion of the project area. An open house comment was received from a property owner at 8030 Hidden Circle concerning poor pavement drainage. This drainage issue will be resolved with new pavement allowing better drainage of the cul-de-sac. TRAPPERS PASS AREA There are ten roadway low points within the project area. Nine of the roadway low points appear to be functional and located an adequate distance away from adjacent properties. The E.O.F. at Timber Hill Road low point flows south toward the adjacent properties along Timber Hill Road, further survey to confirm elevations is recommended. There are four stormwater ponds in the project area. The E.O.F. for pond SL 1-1 appears to be near adjacent properties along Piedmont Court. The E.O.F. for pond SL 2-1 appears to be near adjacent properties along Trappers Pass. Field survey will be performed during the final design process to confirm E.O.F elevations in relation to adjacent properties. No open house comments were received for this portion of the project. City staff also performed a condition assessment on the existing storm sewer structures to evaluate the need for improvements in project areas. The assessment completed by the City recommends a range of 9 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 improvements to storm sewer structures including ring adjustments, doghouse work, and complete structure replacement. There are no recommended storm sewer pipe improvements as part of the project. Some improvements may be made to some of the E.O.F. after field verifying elevations of the E.O.F. and adjacent properties. SANITARY SEWER The majority of existing sanitary sewer within the project areas consist of 8-inch PVC pipe. Approximately 2,000 feet of sanitary sewer located in the Choctaw Circle area consists of 8-inch ABS pipe. Televising was completed to identify the need for improvements to the sanitary sewer in the majority of areas. Based on a review of the televising information, no major improvements will be required as the sanitary sewer is in adequate condition in all areas except for portions of the sanitary sewer in the Choctaw Circle area that are identified for repair due to encrustation and infiltration. This section of pipe has been added to the project and is identified in Exhibit 4. Further analysis will be made during final design to determine the appropriate rehabilitation method. City staff has prepared a condition assessment of existing sanitary manholes in the project areas to determine the need for repairs, reconstruction, or replacement. Improvements include the replacement of rings and castings as needed, rebuilding structures that are in poor condition and addressing infiltration issues. The detailed cost estimate in Appendix C includes these improvements. The proposed sanitary sewer improvements are shown in Appendix A, Exhibit 4. WATERMAIN The existing water main located within the project areas consist of 6-inch, 8-inch and 12-inch ductile iron pipe (DIP). The Kurvers Point Road area and Redwing Lane area consists entirely of 6-inch DIP. The Marsh Drive area, Choctaw Circle area, and Lake Lucy Road area all consist of both 6-inch and 8-inch DIP. The Trappers Pass area mainly consists of 6-inch and 8-inch DIP; however, 12-inch DIP water main is also present. Based on coordination with City staff, it was determined that most of the improvements will be limited to replacing existing bolts on gate valves. The specific gate valves needing improvement have been evaluated and determined by City staff to be included in this project. The City evaluated the feasibility of removing a portion of water main in the Lake Lucy area where there is existing 6-inch water main connecting Lake Lucy Road and Western Drive. This section of water main is located outside of the public roadway right-of-way and is within the backyards of multiple properties as seen in Appendix A, Exhibit 4 (3 of 4). Eliminating this water main section would alleviate maintenance access issues in the future. A water main elimination analysis report was completed on February 24, 2020 by WSB. This report concluded that removing the existing 6-inch watermain between Lake Lucy Road and Western Drive would not cause any disruptions or issues with water pressure and available fire flows. The cost to remove this section of water main and relocate the existing water services is estimated at $75,000. This cost is currently not included in the project costs. Proposed water main improvements for each area are shown in Appendix A, Exhibit 4. 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 10 RIGHT-OF-W AY AND E ASEMENT REQUIREMENTS This feasibility study assumes that no additional right-of-way will be required for the construction of this project. In addition, it is assumed that any easements required for construction will be dedicated at no cost to the City. PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT An open house was held on February 11, 2020 to receive public input. City of Chanhassen and Kimley- Horn staff were present at the meeting to answer questions and provide information on the project. A total of 39 residents signed in and attended the meeting. At least one resident from each of the six areas was present. The main concern heard from property owners were related to drainage issues either within the road or on their private property. The scope of this project is limited to the public right-of-way and any improvements that can be made to improve drainage in the areas of concerned will be addressed during final design. Comment sheets submitted at the open house meeting are provided in Appendix B. ESTIMATED COSTS The estimated costs for 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05, are summarized below. The estimated project costs include a 5% construction cost contingency and an allowance for indirect costs. Detailed cost estimates are provided in Appendix C. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 422,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 235,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 243,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 434,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 648,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 1,897,000.00$ Roadway Subtotal 3,879,000.00$ STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 40,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 68,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 35,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 40,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 61,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 101,000.00$ Storm Sewer Subtotal 345,000.00$ SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY 11 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 C.P. 20-05 Total Area Improvements Amount Lake Lucy Road Area $515,000 Redwing Lane Area $353,000 Choctaw Circle Area $326,000 Kurvers Point Road Area $529,000 Marsh Drive Area $802,000 Trappers Pass Area $2,248,000 Indirect Costs 300,000 Total $5,073,000 METHOD OF FINANCING The improvements described in this report are proposed to be financed through multiple funding sources. Based on the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the following is the preliminary financing plan for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05. 2020 Financing Source Amount General Funds $1,030,132 Surface Water Utility Fund $185,500 Sewer Utility Fund $192,500 Water Utility Fund $600,000 Special Assessments $1,551,868 Total $3,560,000 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 19,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 21,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 29,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 18,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 34,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 88,000.00$ Sanitary Sewer Subtotal 209,000.00$ WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 34,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 29,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 19,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 37,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 59,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 162,000.00$ Water main Subtotal 340,000.00$ INDIRECT COSTS 300,000.00$ TOTAL C.P. 20-05 IMPROVEMENTS COST 5,073,000.00$ 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 12 The project cost for all areas combined exceeds the City’s CIP budget for 2020. To reduce the project scope to fit within the City’s CIP budget, it is recommended that the roadway, storm sewer and utility improvements for the Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane areas be constructed in 2020. The improvements to the remaining project areas could be included in a future project. Below is a summary of a financing plan for a project including the three areas identified above. 2020 Financing Source (Trappers Pass Area, Choctaw Circle Area, Redwing Lane Area) Amount General Funds $1,298,768 Surface Water Utility Fund $185,500 Sewer Utility Fund $192,500 Water Utility Fund $600,000 Special Assessments $950,232 Total $3,227,000 ESTIMATED A SSESSMENTS Special assessments are proposed to be levied against benefiting properties for the improvements included as part of this project. The rates have been established as a rehabilitation project based on the City of Chanhassen’s Assessment Practice updated November 2014. The proposed assessment method is described below. The benefitting properties will be assessed 40% of the roadway rehabilitation cost, including the full-depth reclamation, mill and overlay, bituminous pavement, curb and gutter replacement and drain tile. Only properties with direct driveway access to the roadways within each project area will be considered a benefitting property. Each area will have a separate assessment to reflect the improvements in those neighborhoods. The following is a summary of the proposed assessment rates for the street improvements included as part of this report. LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $422,000 Assessable Units: 55 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $422,000/55 = $7,670 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($7,670/REU) = $3,068 REDWING LANE AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $235,000 Assessable Units: 48 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $235,000/48 = $4,900 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($4,900/REU) = $1,960 CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $243,000 Assessable Units: 45 REU 13 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $243,000/45 = $5,400 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($5,400/REU) = $2,160 KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $434,000 Assessable Units: 40 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $434,000/40 = $10,850 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($10,850/REU) = $4,340 MARSH DRIVE AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $648,000 Assessable Units: 111 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $648,000/111 = $5,840 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($5,840/REU) = $2,336 TRAPPERS PASS AREA Total Estimated Assessable Street Cost: $1,897,000 Assessable Units: 249 REU Estimated 100% Assessment Rate: $1,897,000/249 = $7,620 Estimated 40% Assessment Rate: (40%)*($7,650/REU) = $3,048 The individual assessments range from $1,960 to $4,340 per property. The rate is affected by the type of roadway rehabilitation method recommended and the number of properties in the area. The total assessments to be levied against benefitting properties for the entire programmed improvements are $1,551,868. The amount to be levied against benefitting properties for the 2020 budgeted improvements are $950,232. A preliminary assessment roll is provided in Appendix D detailing the proposed assessments by individual property owner for each area. A map of these properties is shown in Appendix A, Exhibit 5. A special assessment hearing would be required to levy assessments if the project is ordered by the City Council. At this hearing, the Council would determine the amounts of the assessment based on actual construction costs and interest rate to be charged. The assessments would be spread over 8 years. PROJECT SCHEDULE If the City Council chooses to accept this report, we recommend that the following project schedule be followed: City Council Receive Final Feasibility Report Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specs Call Public Hearing April 13, 2020 Public Hearing April 27, 2020 Council Approves Plans and Specs May 25, 2020 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation │ Feasibility Report April 13, 2020 │ City Project No. 20-05 14 Authorize Advertisement for Bids Bid Opening June 19, 2020 Neighborhood Meeting June 30, 2020 Assessment Hearing & Council Awards Contract July 13, 2020 Begin Construction Late July 2020 Substantial Construction Complete November 2020 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the analysis completed as part of this report, the proposed 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project 20-05, are feasible, necessary, and cost effective, and would benefit the properties in the project area and the City of Chanhassen. We recommend the following: A. The City Council accepts this feasibility report and authorizes preparation of plans and specifications and calling of a public hearing for improvements to the Trappers Pass, Choctaw Circle and Redwing Lane areas. APPENDIX A EXHIBITS LAKE LUCY RD. AREA CHOCTAW CIR. AREA KURVERS POINT RD. AREA MARSH DR. AREA REDWING LN. AREA TRAPPERS PASS AREA PROJECT LOCATION MAP 2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 EXHIBIT 1 ℄℄K:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_TYP SECT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:42am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 TYPICAL SECTION EXHIBIT 2 5 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY FULL DEPTH MILL & OVERLAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGENDK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_RDWY.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:42am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTHMARSH DRIVE AREA MAP ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 3 - 1 OF 4 MARSH DRIVE AREA 101 101 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY FULL DEPTH MILL & OVERLAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGENDK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_RDWY.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:43am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH CHOCTAW CIRCLE & KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA MAP ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 3 - 2 OF 4 KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY FULL DEPTH MILL & OVERLAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGENDK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_RDWY.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:44am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH LAKE LUCY ROAD & REDWING LANE AREA MAP ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 3 - 3 OF 4 LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA REDWING LANE AREA 101 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 2.5" MILL & OVERLAY FULL DEPTH MILL & OVERLAY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LEGENDK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_RDWY.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:44am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH TRAPPERS PASS AREA MAP ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 3 - 4 OF 4 TRAPPERS PASS AREA 555 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_UTIL.dwg March 18, 2020 - 12:24pm2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTHMARSH DRIVE AREA MAP UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 - 1 OF 4 MARSH DRIVE AREA 28 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 101101101 101101101 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_UTIL.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:48am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH CHOCTAW CIRCLE & KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA MAP UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 - 2 OF 4 KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA 9 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 9 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_UTIL.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:49am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH LAKE LUCY ROAD & REDWING LANE AREA MAP UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 - 3 OF 4 LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA REDWING LANE AREA 14 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 16 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 101101101 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS STORM SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_UTIL.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:51am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH TRAPPERS PASS AREA MAP UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT 4 - 4 OF 4 TRAPPERS PASS AREA 77 GATE VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENTS 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 52 51 50 494847 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 373635343332313029 2827 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 112111110 109108107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 989796 95 94 93 9291 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 390 380 370 360 350 340 330 320 310 300 280 260 250 80208040806080808090810081208140 8150 81608170 8180 8191 8181 8161 8141 8121 8101 8091 8081 8061 8041 8021 8001 8110 8114 8116 8118 8124 8283 8263 8243 8223 8203 8193 8183 8173 8163 8153 8143 8133 8123 8113 8103 331 321 311 8091 80818071 8061 8051 8040 8030 8020 8010 8000 271 261 80808090 8100 811081208130 8140 8150 8160 8170 8180 8190 310 320 330340341 331 321 311 301 8128 8130 8132 8134 8136 8138 8140 8139 8137 8135 8133 8131 8129 8127 8123 8121 8117 8113 5 PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:51am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTHMARSH DRIVE AREA MAP PROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAP EXHIBIT 5 - 1 OF 4 MARSH DRIVE AREA 101 113114115 116 117 118 119 120 121122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132133134135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 722172317241 7261 7271 71 51 41 21 20 40 60 40 30 20 2131 7361 7371 7381 73807370 7360 7350 7340 7330 7320 7310 7290 7280 7240 7220 7200 7160 7150 7140 7130 7120 7131 7151 A B 7251 101 101 153 153 154 154 157158159160161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173174175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 155156 197 196 195 194 193 192 191 190189 188 187 186 6850 15 31517191101105 111 115 121 125 131 135 141 145 151 155 161 160 154 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 70 50 30 6811 6805 6801 6791 6781 6771 6761 67516750 6760 6770 6780 6790 6800 101 PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:52am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH CHOCTAW CIRCLE & KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA MAP PROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAP EXHIBIT 5 - 2 OF 4 KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231232 233 234235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 199 198 6770 6781 6790 6800 6820 6840 6850 6870 6880 6890 6900 6910 6920 6921 6911 6901 6891 6881 6871 6841 6840 6821 6801 6791 6781 6770 6780 6790 6800 6820 6830 6771 6781 960 950 940 930 920 910 902 900 901 911 921 931 941 951 961 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 259 257 258 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 285284283 282 281 280 279 278 277 276 275 274 273 272 271 270 298 299 246 247 297 296 295 294 293 292 291 289288 290 287 286 6500 6520 6540 6560 6580 6590 6581 6561 6541 6531 6501 6481 6491 6493 64951 6501 6511 900 880 860 840 820 861 881 901921 6561 6581 920940960980 6580 6560 6540 6520 6500 10001020104010601080 1100 6581 1121 1101 1081 1061 1041 1021 1001 981 961 941 921 6641 299A PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 5:30pm2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH LAKE LUCY ROAD & REDWING LANE AREA MAP PROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAP EXHIBIT 5 - 3 OF 4 LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA REDWING LANE AREA 101 302303304305 306 307 308 309 310 311312 318 319 320 321322 323 324 325 326327 328 329 330331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404405406407 408 409 410 411 416 415 414413412 427 426425 424 417418 419 420 421422423 434 435 436437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444445 428 429 430431 432 433 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 473474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491468 469 470471472 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 501 500 502 516 517 503 515 504 514 505506 507 508 509 510 511 513 512 541 518 540 519 539 520521 522 523 524 525526 527528529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 6300 639063806370 6360201 211 221 231 241251261 271 6331 6341 6351 64216420 6410 6355 6357 6359 6363 6365 6367 63696371 6373 6375 6377 6379 6381 6383 6385 6387 6389 6391 6393 6395 6397 6399 6401 6403 6405 6407 6409 6411 6300 6306 6310 6320 6330 6340 6350 6368 6366 6341 6331 6321 6311 6301 6408 501 491 481 461 431 421 401 381 361 341 321 301 291 251 6260 6240 6220 6210 6201 6221 6241 6261 241 221 210 6281 6291 6301 6311 6331 6351 6371 6391 6340 6232 6230 6228 6226 6224 6222 6220 6218 6216 6214 185183 181 180 170 160 150 6208 6206 6204 6202 6200 98 96 94 92 90 88 86 87 89 91939597 96 94 92 90 88 91 93 95 97 96 94 92 90 88 919395 97 98 96 92 90 88 86 84 82 81 83 85 87899193 95 97 99 101 100110 120 130 121 111 6300 101 6310 6320 6225 6223 6221 6219 6217 6215 6213 6211 6209 6207 6205 6203 6201 6199 431 6300 6310 6311 6321 500 480 460 430 411 6320 410 420 430 6358 6356 6354 6352 6350 6340 6330 6320 6310 6300 3003406301 6311 6321 63316340 6330 290 6301 6311 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 6330 201 221241 260 280 6300 250 6362 6370 301 300310 331 301 291 300 313 314 315 316 317 446447448449 450451 542 543544 545 546 547 452 548 101 PUBLIC SINGLE-FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAYK:\TWC_Civil\City\CHANHASSEN\2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION\CAD\Plan Sheets\Exhibits\Feasibility\2020_PAVE-REHAB_FEAS_ASSESSMENT.dwg March 18, 2020 - 10:53am2020 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CITY PROJECT NO. 20-05 NORTH TRAPPERS PASS AREA MAP PROPOSED ASSESSMENT MAP EXHIBIT 5 - 4 OF 4 TRAPPERS PASS AREA APPENDIX B PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE INFORMATION APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ESTIMATES FIGURE 1A CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS SUMMARY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 422,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 235,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 243,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 434,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 648,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 1,897,000.00$ Roadway Subtotal 3,879,000.00$ STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 40,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 68,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 35,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 40,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 61,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 101,000.00$ Storm Sewer Subtotal 345,000.00$ SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 19,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 21,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 29,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 18,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 34,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 88,000.00$ Sanitary Sewer Subtotal 209,000.00$ WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS SUMMARY Lake Lucy Road Area 34,000.00$ Redwing Lane Area 29,000.00$ Choctaw Circle Area 19,000.00$ Kurvers Point Area 37,000.00$ Marsh Drive Area 59,000.00$ Trappers Pass Area 162,000.00$ Water main Subtotal 340,000.00$ INDIRECT COSTS 300,000.00$ TOTAL C.P. 20-05 IMPROVEMENTS COST 5,073,000.00$ FIGURE 1B CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL LAKE LUCY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS = $515,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 20,000.00$20,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 700 5.00$3,500.00$ 3 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 14000 4.00$56,000.00$ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 1500 75.00$112,500.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 1500 80.00$120,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 700 25.00$17,500.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 1300 8.00$10,400.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 300 60.00$18,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 11 SIGNING / STRIPING LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 12 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 1000 20.00$20,000.00$ 13 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 9 500.00$4,500.00$ Subtotal 402,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 20,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 422,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 2 500.00$1,000.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 2 4,000.00$8,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 14 1,500.00$21,000.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 4 1,500.00$6,000.00$ 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 4 500.00$2,000.00$ Subtotal 38,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 40,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 14 500.00$7,000.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2 1,500.00$3,000.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 14 250.00$3,500.00$ 4 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 6 700.00$4,200.00$ Subtotal 18,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 19,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 16 2,000.00$32,000.00$ Subtotal 32,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 34,000.00$ FIGURE 1C CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: REDWING LANE AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL REDWING LANE IMPROVEMENTS = $353,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 700 5.00$3,500.00$ 3 MILL BITUMINOUS (2.5")SQ YD 8800 4.00$35,200.00$ 4 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2.5")TON 1400 80.00$112,000.00$ 5 BITUMINOUS REMOVAL / PATCHING SQ YD 600 30.00$18,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 600 25.00$15,000.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 600 8.00$4,800.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 100 60.00$6,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 11 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 200 20.00$4,000.00$ 12 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 1 500.00$500.00$ Subtotal 224,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 11,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 235,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 10 500.00$5,000.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 10 4,000.00$40,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 5 1,500.00$7,500.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 1 1,500.00$1,500.00$ 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 21 500.00$10,500.00$ Subtotal 65,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 3,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 68,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 13 500.00$6,500.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 3 1,500.00$4,500.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 13 250.00$3,250.00$ 4 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 8 700.00$5,600.00$ Subtotal 20,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 21,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 14 2,000.00$28,000.00$ Subtotal 28,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 29,000.00$ FIGURE 1D CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CHOCTAW CIRCLE IMPROVEMENTS = $326,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 600 5.00$3,000.00$ 3 MILL BITUMINOUS (2.5")SQ YD 6400 4.00$25,600.00$ 4 MILL BITUMINOUS (FULL DEPTH)SQ YD 1500 4.00$6,000.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2.5" - 4")TON 1400 80.00$112,000.00$ 6 BITUMINOUS REMOVAL / PATCHING SQ YD 600 30.00$18,000.00$ 7 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 600 25.00$15,000.00$ 8 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 9 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 800 8.00$6,400.00$ 10 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 150 60.00$9,000.00$ 11 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 12 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 500 20.00$10,000.00$ 13 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2 500.00$1,000.00$ Subtotal 231,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 12,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 243,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 5 500.00$2,500.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 4 4,000.00$16,000.00$ 3 18" FLARED END SECTION EACH 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2 1,500.00$3,000.00$ 5 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 1 1,500.00$1,500.00$ 6 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 9 500.00$4,500.00$ Subtotal 33,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 35,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 7 500.00$3,500.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 7 1,500.00$10,500.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 7 250.00$1,750.00$ 4 SANITARY SEWER PIPE REHABILITATION LIN FT 160 75.00$12,000.00$ Subtotal 28,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 29,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 9 2,000.00$18,000.00$ Subtotal 18,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 19,000.00$ FIGURE 1E CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL KURVERS POINT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS = $529,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 20,000.00$20,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 800 5.00$4,000.00$ 3 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 13500 4.00$54,000.00$ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 1600 75.00$120,000.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 1600 80.00$128,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 800 25.00$20,000.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 1400 8.00$11,200.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 250 60.00$15,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 11 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 1200 20.00$24,000.00$ 12 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 3 500.00$1,500.00$ Subtotal 413,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 21,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 434,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 4 500.00$2,000.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 4 4,000.00$16,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 9 1,500.00$13,500.00$ 4 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 13 500.00$6,500.00$ Subtotal 38,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 40,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 20 500.00$10,000.00$ 2 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 20 250.00$5,000.00$ 3 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 3 700.00$2,100.00$ Subtotal 17,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 1,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 18,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH 2 500.00$1,000.00$ 2 HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE EACH 2 8,000.00$16,000.00$ 3 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 9 2,000.00$18,000.00$ Subtotal 35,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 37,000.00$ FIGURE 1F CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: MARSH DRIVE AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL MARSH DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS = $802,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 30,000.00$30,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 1300 5.00$6,500.00$ 3 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 21000 4.00$84,000.00$ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 2500 75.00$187,500.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 2500 80.00$200,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 1300 25.00$32,500.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$5,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 1800 8.00$14,400.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 350 60.00$21,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 11 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 1200 20.00$24,000.00$ 12 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 4 500.00$2,000.00$ Subtotal 617,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 31,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 648,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 5 500.00$2,500.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 5 4,000.00$20,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 14 1,500.00$21,000.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 6 1,500.00$9,000.00$ 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 10 500.00$5,000.00$ Subtotal 58,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 3,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 61,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 31 500.00$15,500.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 1 1,500.00$1,500.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 31 250.00$7,750.00$ 4 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 10 700.00$7,000.00$ Subtotal 32,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 2,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 34,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 28 2,000.00$56,000.00$ Subtotal 56,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 3,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 59,000.00$ FIGURE 1G CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) ESTIMATED COSTS: TRAPPERS PASS AREA ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL TRAPPERS PASS IMPROVEMENTS = $2,248,000 Item No.Item Description Unit Total Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 110,000.00$110,000.00$ 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB - SPOT CURB REPLACEMENT LIN FT 2000 5.00$10,000.00$ 3 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SQ YD 64000 4.00$256,000.00$ 4 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 7800 75.00$585,000.00$ 5 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (C) (2")TON 7800 80.00$624,000.00$ 6 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SPOT CURB LIN FT 2000 25.00$50,000.00$ 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$10,000.00$ 8 TURF ESTABLISHMENT - SOD SQ YD 3500 8.00$28,000.00$ 9 TOPSOIL BORROW CU YD 700 60.00$42,000.00$ 10 EROSION CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 25,000.00$25,000.00$ 11 4" SUBSURFACE DRAINTILE LIN FT 3100 20.00$62,000.00$ 12 CONNECT DRAINTILE TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 10 500.00$5,000.00$ Subtotal 1,807,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 90,000.00$ Total Street Improvements Cost 1,897,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 REMOVE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EACH 17 500.00$8,500.00$ 2 STORM SEWER MANHOLE / CATCH BASIN EACH 17 4,000.00$68,000.00$ 3 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE EACH 5 1,500.00$7,500.00$ 4 RECONSTRUCT STORM SEWER MANHOLE-SPECIAL EACH 1 1,500.00$1,500.00$ 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 20 500.00$10,000.00$ Subtotal 96,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 5,000.00$ Total Storm Sewer Improvements Cost 101,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EACH 88 500.00$44,000.00$ 2 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 2 1,500.00$3,000.00$ 3 26" SANITARY SEWER LID EACH 88 250.00$22,000.00$ 4 GROUT MANHOLE EACH 22 700.00$15,400.00$ Subtotal 84,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 4,000.00$ Total Sanitary Sewer Improvements Cost 88,000.00$ Item No.Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 VALVE BOLT REPLACEMENT EACH 77 2,000.00$154,000.00$ Subtotal 154,000.00$ 5% Construction Contingency 8,000.00$ Total Watermain Improvements Cost 162,000.00$ APPENDIX D PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 648,000.00$ 5,840.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 1 253450130 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & DEBRA PRIGGE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 2 253450120 SINGLE-FAMILY BISRAT & DENISE ALEMAYEHU 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 3 253450110 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & GAIL DIEDRICK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 4 253450100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & CAROL UDSTUEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 5 253450090 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & JULIE NESSLY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 6 253450080 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW PATTEE & DONNA SPINELLI 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 7 253450070 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID LYONS & JULIE TENHOFF-LYONS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 8 253450060 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN OLSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 9 253450050 SINGLE-FAMILY CORY & AMY MILLER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 10 253450040 SINGLE-FAMILY LEE & MARY KAUFMAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 11 253450030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL ALBERTS & JENNIFER KOTTKE-ALBERTS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 12 253450020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & REBECCA BUSACKER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 13 253450010 SINGLE-FAMILY KUE & CAROL VANG 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 14 253450140 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & DENISE MCALPIN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 $ 2,336.00 15 253450150 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & PAMELA MURPHY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 $ 2,336.00 16 253450160 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & LANA BERGO 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 17 253450170 SINGLE-FAMILY STANLEY H LESTER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 18 253450180 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SONJA DENOW 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 19 253450190 SINGLE-FAMILY JOANNE MARIE SOUSA 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 20 253450200 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN LESLIE RASMUSSEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 21 253450210 SINGLE-FAMILY GREGORY & KAREN GMITERKO 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 22 253450220 SINGLE-FAMILY SUSAN ROSE SULLIVAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 23 253450230 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES RADTKE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 24 253450240 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JEANNE HUNT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 25 253450250 SINGLE-FAMILY VENKATESH PARAMESHWARAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 26 253450260 SINGLE-FAMILY LAMONTE & JANICE EASTVOLD 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 27 253450270 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & DENISE LEBENS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 28 253450280 SINGLE-FAMILY DALE & ZOLA KLABUNDE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 29 253450290 SINGLE-FAMILY DANA & EMILY SANDS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 30 253450300 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ADELL GLASER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 31 253450310 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LINDA GIORDANO 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 32 253450320 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN TODD BLACK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 33 253450330 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN KLINSING 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 34 253450340 SINGLE-FAMILY NGUYEN & BINH NGU CHAU 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 35 253450350 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & AMBER WAHL 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 36 253450360 SINGLE-FAMILY BRAIN & JEAN STECKLING 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 37 253450370 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWARD & HANNAH RAUPP 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 38 253450380 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MICHELLE HAIK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 39 253450390 SINGLE-FAMILY JESSICA LOVERING 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 40 253450400 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK LAKOSKY & JULIE STEVENSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 41 253450410 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & EMMA TURNER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 42 253450420 SINGLE-FAMILY LAUREN & SHAUNA KOPP 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 43 253450430 SINGLE-FAMILY SHANNON MCCLARD & SHERRIE PETERSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 44 253450440 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SUSAN BLAKE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 45 253450450 SINGLE-FAMILY EVANGELINE CUBALCHINI 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 46 253450460 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK ASHWELL 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 47 253450470 SINGLE-FAMILY CLARISSA & FRANK TERSCHAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 48 253450480 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEL MATTHEWS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 49 253450490 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & WHITNEY GOHAM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 50 253450500 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & CARLA THOMPSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 51 253450510 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JODI SCHLEYER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 52 253450520 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & DEBORAH SEMKE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 53 253450530 SINGLE-FAMILY BRANDON & JENNIFER HOUGHHAM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 54 253450540 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & PRUDENCE BUSCH 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 55 253450550 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & ELIZABETH 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 56 253450560 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY STUTELBERG 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 57 253450570 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON& BRANDI STENSOS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 58 253450580 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT & CATHERINE GALLOWAY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 59 253450590 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDY & KRISTINE IMKER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 60 253450600 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD HLADKY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 61 253450610 SINGLE-FAMILY JEREMY & DANA STETZER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 62 253450620 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE & JOYCE BOJE 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 63 253450630 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE & JOAN DEMETER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 64 253450640 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & GERALYNN COLOSEY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 65 253450650 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SUSAN THORUD 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 66 253450660 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MICHELLE AAS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 67 253450670 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBER & KATHLEEN OLMSTED 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 68 253450680 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTHONY & JANET MERTES 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 69 253450690 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & CHERYL KINSELLA 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 70 253450700 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK RAY SCHUMACHER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 71 253450710 SINGLE-FAMILY CURTIS MATTERN & STACEY SEIM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 72 251820520 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & JESSICA LAMBRECHT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 73 NOT USED 74 251820720 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & HALLIE TIFFANY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 75 253450720 SINGLE-FAMILY NICKMARK LLC 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 76 253450730 SINGLE-FAMILY BRENDA JANE WALSH 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 77 253450740 SINGLE-FAMILY BLAKE SPILLERS & JENNIFER GRAHAM-SPILLERS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 78 253451090 SINGLE-FAMILY KRISSY & PETER DOHERTY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 79 253451080 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ROSA SEIM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 80 253451070 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT MYERS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 81 253451060 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SHERI LEWIS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 82 253451050 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & RENE LUCAS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 83 253451040 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & REBECCA LEGLER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 84 253451030 SINGLE-FAMILY MARIE & DEAN SUND 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 85 253451022 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & KATHRYNE SLAVICS 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - MARSH DRIVE AREA Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost 648,000.00$ 5,840.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - MARSH DRIVE AREA Roadway Assessment Total Estimated Roadway Cost 86 253451010 SINGLE-FAMILY JON & SARAH HANSEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 87 253451000 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL BOGDEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 88 253450990 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & LAURIE LANGLEY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 89 253450980 SINGLE-FAMILY PHILIP & LUCILLE REHM 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 90 253450970 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE & PEI LING JAMISON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 91 253450960 SINGLE-FAMILY DANLD WILDMAN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 92 253450950 SINGLE-FAMILY GENE & KIM HEIKKINEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 93 253450940 SINGLE-FAMILY AMY WESLEY 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 94 253450930 SINGLE-FAMILY TYLER & JANE PETERSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 95 253450920 SINGLE-FAMILY LOREN & KATHRYN SPENLER 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 96 253450910 SINGLE-FAMILY JAN WESTGAARD 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 97 253450900 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & PATRICIA HAMBLIN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 98 253450890 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & KARIN OLSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 99 253450880 SINGLE-FAMILY LUKE & KIMBERLY NELSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 100 253450870 SINGLE-FAMILY ANGELA BIALCZYK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 101 253450860 SINGLE-FAMILY DONOVAN LEE ISDAHL 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 102 253450850 SINGLE-FAMILY CHERYL FELTON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 103 253450840 SINGLE-FAMILY KEITH & DIANA ANDERSON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 104 253450830 SINGLE-FAMILY DARRIN & MICHELLE ARLT 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 105 253450820 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE & CYNTHIA MARENGO 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 106 253450810 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SANDRA BERGGREN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 107 253450800 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & RITA KLAUDA 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 108 253450790 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & STEPHANIE KLEIN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 109 253450780 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPH LESER & COLLEEN CANNON 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 110 253450770 SINGLE-FAMILY TREVOR & JULIE MAASSEN 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 111 253450760 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JENNIFER HELMICK 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 112 253450750 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & LOIS SAVARD 1 40% $ 2,336.00 2,336.00$ 111 TOTAL 259,296.00$Assessment Totals 434,000.00$ 10,850.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT A 253920270 H.O.A.KURVERS POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 0 40% $ --$ B 253920320 H.O.A.KURVERS POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 0 40% $ --$ 113 253920260 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LAURANNA GODFREY 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 114 253920250 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES HENRICK 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 115 253920240 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW JENSEN & JENNIFER TIBODEAU-JOHNSON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 116 253920230 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LISA FARLAND 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 117 253920220 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHLEEN GROVER 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 118 253920210 SINGLE-FAMILY KARMIN & STEVEN CORKERY 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 119 253920200 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & JODI RADEL 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 120 253920190 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE J MCGROTTY ETAL 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 121 253920180 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD ANTON & DIANNE DEERING 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 122 253920170 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & ELIZABETH HARRINGTON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 123 253920160 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & CHRISTINE OSTBYE 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 124 253920150 SINGLE-FAMILY CRAIG & SANDRA CARLSON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 125 253930140 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY & KATHLEEN VELDBOOM 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 126 253930130 SINGLE-FAMILY CAMERON & ERIN REINHART 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 127 253930120 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & JODIE SIEMS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 128 253930110 SINGLE-FAMILY TANYA GLATTLY 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 129 253930100 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & DEBORAH WOLFF 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 130 253930090 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANK & LISA MENDEZ 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 131 253930080 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK ENGASSER 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 132 253930070 SINGLE-FAMILY KURT & DEANA FOSSEY 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 133 253930060 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT JOHNSON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 134 253930050 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & NANCY KOCH 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 135 253930040 SINGLE-FAMILY SUSAN APPLEGATE 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 136 253930030 SINGLE-FAMILY BRAIN & KRISTEN APPLEGATE 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 137 253930020 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY ANTHONY WARMUTH 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 138 253930010 SINGLE-FAMILY ALFRED & SUSAN HENDERSON 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 139 253920010 SINGLE-FAMILY MOHAMMED NASHAWATY & HAZAR ALNAHASS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 140 253920020 SINGLE-FAMILY BROOKE & KJIRSTEN NYSTROM 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 141 253920030 SINGLE-FAMILY DANNY & BRENDA VATLAND 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 142 253920040 SINGLE-FAMILY COREY & AMY FRANKLIN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 143 253920050 SINGLE-FAMILY JACQUELINE KURVERS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 144 253920060 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANKLIN & MYRNA KURVERS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 145 253920130 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & DANIELLE HUTTNER 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 146 253920140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JODI OSTENDORF 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 147 253920070 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN MESTITZ & PEGGY NAAS 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 148 256950010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & JINNY SENN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 149 256950020 SINGLE-FAMILY CRAIG & LAURIE BURFEIND 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 150 253920100 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & SOPHIE CHABIN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 151 253920110 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & SOPHIE CHABIN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 152 253920120 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & NARTHLADA FREEMAN 1 40% $ 4,340.00 4,340.00$ 40 TOTAL 173,600.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - KURVERS POINT ROAD AREA 243,000.00$ 5,400.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 153 250012000 / 254200451 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT & JANET WOLTER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 154 254200450 / 254200010 SINGLE-FAMILY RICK & ROBERTA MURRAY 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 155 254200020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID DEAN GUGGEMOS 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 156 254200030 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & JESSICA ABRAMS 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 157 254200040 SINGLE-FAMILY ELIZABETH & JEFFREY WELTER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 158 254200050 SINGLE-FAMILY ALAN & BRENDA LEM 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 159 254200060 SINGLE-FAMILY GARY WELCH 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 160 254200070 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & LENORE DRYKE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 161 254200080 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & BARBARA HECTORNE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 162 254200090 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES & PAULA HALLAU 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 163 254200440 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & STACEY HORVICK 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 164 254200430 SINGLE-FAMILY KENTON & SHARON TOLLBERG 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 165 254200420 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSHUA & JENNIFER REITAN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 166 254200410 SINGLE-FAMILY ALLISTER TUDOR & DENISE JONES 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 167 254200400 SINGLE-FAMILY HARVEY & CATHERINE GREEN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 168 254200390 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW BALAZS & KRISTEN FRAZER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 169 254200380 SINGLE-FAMILY LAURA METTNER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 170 254200370 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRIS & JANA CASTILLON 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 171 254200360 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH EDWARD ALEXANDER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 172 254200350 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & JESSICA ENGLUND 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 173 254200340 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & CAROL KAHNKE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 174 254200330 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT HOFFNER & KAREN HUGHES-HOFFNER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 175 254200320 SINGLE-FAMILY NEIL LIBSON & SUSAN DREVES 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 176 2545200310 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTIANE PEREIRA DOLABELLA DUARTE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 177 2540200300 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA & MARC HEAGNEY 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 178 254200290 SINGLE-FAMILY LANCE & SUSAN STREFF 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 179 254200280 SINGLE-FAMILY JESSICA & JOSHUA FRIE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 180 254200270 SINGLE-FAMILY WAYNE & CATHY DIONNE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 181 254200260 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & KIIRSTEN RAKERS 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 182 254200250 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS LAUBY & MARY BURKHARDT 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 183 254200240 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & AMBER BATTIN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 184 254200230 SINGLE-FAMILY NICHOLAS & SANDRA GASSMAN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 185 254200220 SINGLE-FAMILY JAIMIE LAVANGER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 186 254200210 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ANN RHODES 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 187 254200200 SINGLE-FAMILY COLLEEN & STEPHEN FRANKWITZ 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 188 254200190 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK NOLAN & CARLA HANSON-NOLAN 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 189 254200180 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & CHARLENE BOROTZ 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 190 254200170 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER BORNS 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 191 254200160 SINGLE-FAMILY LEAH THOMAS & CHRISTINE SMITH 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 192 254200150 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL & MELISSA ECKER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 193 254200140 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & JESSICA FRIBERG 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 194 254200130 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & GLENDA SPEECE 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 195 254200120 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES SIMON & ANGELA SCHLENDER 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 196 254200110 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & STACY MCNABB 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 197 254200100 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA WALSTON 1 40% $ 2,160.00 2,160.00$ 45 TOTAL 97,200.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - CHOCTAW CIRCLE AREA 235,000.00$ 4,900.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 198 252000510 SINGLE-FAMILY RANY & KRISTIN BAANA 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 199 252000520 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHANIEL HERMAN & LORI BESSINGER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 200 252000530 SINGLE-FAMILY SANDRA WALTON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 201 252000540 SINGLE-FAMILY LAURA BEERS & BLAKE FREESE 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 202 252000550 SINGLE-FAMILY DIRK KREMERS 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 203 252000560 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN SMITH & ELIZABETH REASON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 204 252000570 SINGLE-FAMILY JACK & ANN DOWNEY 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 205 252000580 SINGLE-FAMILY GLENN & LISA KAUFMANN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 206 252000590 SINGLE-FAMILY BETH FLOTTMEIER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 207 252000600 SINGLE-FAMILY LAUREL YOUNG 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 208 252000610 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN WOOLCOTT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 209 252000620 SINGLE-FAMILY SHELLEY MEHL 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 210 252000630 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEC YOUNG & ELIZABETH MATZEK 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 211 252000250 SINGLE-FAMILY YAN KENT & ANN SEVERSON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 212 252000240 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT DEHN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 213 252000230 SINGLE-FAMILY MITCHELL& KATHLEEN FREIDERICH 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 214 252200220 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ASHLEY SELLERS 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 215 252000210 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SUSANN JOHNSON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 216 252000200 SINGLE-FAMILY JERRY & CINDRA BAHMILLER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 217 252000190 SINGLE-FAMILY CASEY & KEVIN KURTT 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 218 252000180 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEY BRODAHL & TAMARA BRUESS 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 219 252000170 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEY & PATRICIA FLOE 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 220 252000160 SINGLE-FAMILY DEAN & LAURA BIRD 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 221 252000150 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & DEBRA LARSON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 222 252000140 SINGLE-FAMILY ELEANOR & DIRK DOBBINS 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 223 252000130 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY JEAN NORTH 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 224 252000120 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN PETRICK 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 225 252000110 SINGLE-FAMILY BRYAN & CAROL MCGOVERN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 226 252000100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & AMY DEBLOCK 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 227 252000090 SINGLE-FAMILY LEROY & WANDA BITELER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 228 252000080 SINGLE-FAMILY NICHOLAS JOHNSON & JENNIFER GLIDDEN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 229 252000070 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & TAMARA ENGESETHER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 230 252000060 SINGLE-FAMILY ANNE & DANA MOSTAD 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 231 252000050 SINGLE-FAMILY BRENT BAUER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 232 252000040 SINGLE-FAMILY KEITH & JAYNE MOODY 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 233 252000030 SINGLE-FAMILY RAY & MARY MIKKONEN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 234 252000020 SINGLE-FAMILY FOURCO LLC 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 235 252000360 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY & CHARLOTTE SAVALOJA 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 236 252000370 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN SERVEY & TAYLOR WALDIN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 237 252000380 SINGLE-FAMILY JOEL & ALEXIA SUITER 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 238 252000390 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & MELISSA BROICH 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 239 252000400 SINGLE-FAMILY BRUCE SCHULTZ 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 240 252000410 SINGLE-FAMILY HEIDI & MICHAEL COLGAN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 241 252000420 SINGLE-FAMILY IH2 PROPERTY BORROWER LP 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 242 252000430 SINGLE-FAMILY DALE & MARY ANDERSON 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 243 252000440 SINGLE-FAMILY CHAD SHARKEY & SARAH FORSMAN 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 244 252000450 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & JESSICA SHAUGHNESSY 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 245 252000460 SINGLE-FAMILY ARNOLD & LORNA LEMKE 1 40% $ 1,960.00 1,960.00$ 48 TOTAL 94,080.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - REDWING LANE AREA 422,000.00$ 7,670.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 246 251600030 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ANNE MCGINN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 247 251620130 SINGLE-FAMILY LESTER & JUDY BOLSTAD 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 248 251620140 SINGLE-FAMILY GEOFFREY & JULIA SEPER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 249 251620150 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & AMANDA DURRANT 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 250 251620160 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & TERESA SCHREMPP 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 251 251620170 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER UNGER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 252 251620180 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY & KAROL JOHNSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 253 251620190 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KATHRYN MOZDREN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 254 251620200 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SUSAN DUCHENE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 255 251620210 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & PAMELA O'CONNOR 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 256 251620220 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT KAHLMEYER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 257 251620010 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON LOCHER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 258 251620020 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDALL & TRACY BENSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 259 251620030 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA SLEZAK-MOSER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 260 251620040 SINGLE-FAMILY BRYCE FIER & MARY MARKUN-FIER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 261 251620050 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA HADRYS 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 262 251620060 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & DENISE CLARKE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 263 251620070 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTONIO & AMY FRICANO 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 264 251620080 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & MONICA KOSVIC 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 265 251620090 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & PATTI MANNING 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 266 251620100 SINGLE-FAMILY JORGE GUANTER-GALTES & MIREIA MONLLOR TORMOS 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 267 258710050 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MARY LYNN PATTERSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 268 258710040 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWARD & PAMELA CAPPELLE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 269 258710030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL JOHNSON & GWEN WESTPHAL-JOHNSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 270 258710020 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY KIFFIN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 271 258710010 SINGLE-FAMILY ZANE & ARCELIA DETERT 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 272 258690020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & MAREN REEDER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 273 258690030 SINGLE-FAMILY CLAUS & LEONARDA CANELL 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 274 258690040 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & JODIE KUEPPERS 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 275 258690050 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & LAURIE DONOHUE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 276 258690060 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & KAREN FLYNN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 277 258690070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH CALDWELL 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 278 258690080 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & KATHLEEN ANDERSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 279 258690090 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDER & KAITLIN HAAR 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 280 258690100 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & JODIE GRADY 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 281 258690110 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & KAREN WUJEK 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 282 258690120 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KATHLEEN NORTON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 283 258690010 SINGLE-FAMILY CURTIS BINDER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 284 258710210 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & FOTINI DONNELLY 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 285 258730010 SINGLE-FAMILY PHILIP & LEEANNE LARSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 286 258730020 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & AMY CONWAY 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 287 258710060 SINGLE-FAMILY PAMELA LIBBY 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 288 258710070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & BARBARA HANSEN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 289 258710080 SINGLE-FAMILY WALTER & CONSTANCE LINDER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 290 258710090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SARAH CAVIN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 291 258710100 SINGLE-FAMILY DONALD & CANDACE DECOSSE 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 292 258710110 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & KATHERINE BENSON 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 293 258710120 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & NESSA SANDER 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 294 258710130 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & ELIZABETH MANNING 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 295 258710140 SINGLE-FAMILY VITO & MELAINIE QUAGLIA 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 296 258710150 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & DARLENE OLSEN 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 297 258710160 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHERIN HUYS 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 298 258710170 SINGLE-FAMILY KORD & HEATHER BRASHEAR 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 299 258710180 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & ALANA HOPP 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ 299A 258530030 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ANNE REV TRUST 40% $ 3,068.00 3,068.00$ TOTAL 168,740.00$ CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Roadway Assessment Assessment Totals Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - LAKE LUCY ROAD AREA 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT 300 252110010 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & SARA MUENCH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 301 252110020 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK & WILHELMINE GALLAGHER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 302 252110030 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & DEBRA COOPER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 303 252110040 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & BRYAN WEIGEL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 304 252110050 SINGLE-FAMILY JONNA SHIELDS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 305 252110060 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & GERI MURPHY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 306 252130130 SINGLE-FAMILY SARAH PRUETT & ERIC CHULMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 307 252130120 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & JANE HOGAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 308 252130110 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID PELTIER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 309 252130100 SINGLE-FAMILY SANDRA REISHUS & MEGAN JENSEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 310 252130090 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD EWALD & POLLY STIVLAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 311 252130080 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & MARTHA SCHRADER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 312 252130070 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & TIFFANY FISCO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 313 258640040 SINGLE-FAMILY KAREN LARSEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 314 258640050 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & SUSAN VOELKER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 315 258640090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & STEPHANIE DILLE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 316 258640080 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK HODDER & XUNYU QIAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 317 258640070 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & SHELLEY KOLAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 318 258640060 SINGLE-FAMILY CHARLES & LINNETTE BETTS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 319 258650130 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & KATIE WENDORFF 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 320 258650140 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & ALICE KLINKENBERG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 321 258650150 SINGLE-FAMILY BRET & JENNIFER BARHOOVER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 322 258650160 SINGLE-FAMILY JAYNE ARABANOS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 323 258650170 SINGLE-FAMILY LORI & TROY ROOVERS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 324 258650180 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SYDNEY ROSENBERG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 325 258650190 SINGLE-FAMILY AMY & SCOTT HAIRSTON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 326 258650200 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFERY & SALLY GADBOIS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 327 258070010 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & KATHERINE LUCAS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 328 258090010 SINGLE-FAMILY RANDAL & BRECK STORTS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 329 258090020 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & JULIETTE SCHNEIDER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 330 258090120 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL CARR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 331 258090110 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & SARAH EBELING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 332 258090100 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA COLSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 333 258090090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & MICHELLE STORK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 334 258090080 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SUZANNE BOHN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 335 258090070 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADLEY BILLINGS & ANITA CORNELIUS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 336 258090060 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDER & KARENEA LAI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 337 258090050 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & KAREN CONBOY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 338 258090040 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & KRISTEN HANSBERRY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 339 258090030 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & DIANA DAVIS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 340 258090160 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY KOCHER & CATHERINE CONNEL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 341 258090170 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & KATHERIN WORMS-LYNCH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 342 258090180 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL NOBLE & BONNIE BURNS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 343 258090190 SINGLE-FAMILY GLENNA & CARIN STOLAR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 344 258070210 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & ANN MARIE HAYES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 345 258070220 SINGLE-FAMILY RICHARD & LISA SIMMONS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 346 258070230 SINGLE-FAMILY TINA & JORDAN LAMB 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 347 258580110 SINGLE-FAMILY COREY & JULIE SMITH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 348 258580100 SINGLE-FAMILY ROGER & GAYLE STECH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 349 258580090 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SHALINI CARNEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 350 258580080 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN CAMPBELL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 351 258580070 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & LINDA ROSLANKSKY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 352 258580060 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDRA WOODS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 353 258570080 SINGLE-FAMILY IGOR KOROLEV & KAREN JORDAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 354 258570070 SINGLE-FAMILY JENNIFER & JOSEPH BECKMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 355 258570060 SINGLE-FAMILY WAYNE & PAMELA BENBOW 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 356 258570050 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SONJA PRETASKY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 357 258570040 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & STACY ROHAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 358 258570030 SINGLE-FAMILY RONALD & LYDIA VELANDER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 359 258570020 SINGLE-FAMILY THEODORE & HILARY BECKMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 360 258570010 SINGLE-FAMILY TREVOR & LYN MCCULLOCH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 361 252140050 SINGLE-FAMILY SACHA LIVING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 362 252140060 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & SALLY BICKEL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 363 252140070 SINGLE-FAMILY HAYLEY & DAVIS ZISMER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 364 252140080 SINGLE-FAMILY ADAM & HEATHER WILFORD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 365 252140010 SINGLE-FAMILY ERIC & HEIDI PRESTEEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 366 252140020 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & JANET MADDALENA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 367 252140030 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KRISTINE MOES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 368 252140040 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MARY JO BROKAW 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 369 252120010 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LISA HAZZARD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 370 252120020 SINGLE-FAMILY ALLAN GREEN & KRISTINE SEVERSON-GREEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 371 252120030 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & LAURA ORCUTT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 372 252120040 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & LISA CARLSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 373 252110210 SINGLE-FAMILY FRANK & CATHERINE ZIMMERMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 374 252110200 SINGLE-FAMILY EDWIN & REBECCA EVERETT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 375 252110190 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & LINDA BENDT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 376 252110180 SINGLE-FAMILY VARSHA KANDLIKAR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 377 252110170 SINGLE-FAMILY LOREN & DEBORAH GORDON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 378 252110160 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & SUSAN BRADY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 379 252110150 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SUSAN REISS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 380 252090180 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & ALEXANDRA BIXLER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 381 252090170 SINGLE-FAMILY NORMA KEIVES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 382 252090160 SINGLE-FAMILY PATRICK & ALISHA MURRAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 383 252090150 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & AMY BURTON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 384 252090140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LAURINDA SCHUMACHER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 385 252090130 SINGLE-FAMILY DONALD & CHRISTINE SNEDE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 386 252090120 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & MARIAN HEINEMANN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 387 252090110 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & KATHLEEN ALBRECHT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 388 252090100 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & NANCY RYDLAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 389 252090090 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & MARGO ANDERSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 390 252090080 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & SARA YOCHUM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 391 252100110 SINGLE-FAMILY ALICE LAINE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 392 252100100 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JANICE MOSTROM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 393 252100090 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & AIMEE ANDREOTTI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 394 252100080 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & SARAH MCCUTCHEON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 395 252100070 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & DOROTHY BELLING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 396 252100060 SINGLE-FAMILY TRAVIS LEMKE & KELLI BROWER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 397 252100050 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JAMIELYNN AHLSTEDT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 398 252100040 SINGLE-FAMILY PETER & KAREN MURRAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 399 252100030 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & MICHELLE KLISANICH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 400 252100020 SINGLE-FAMILY DEREK & MELISSA STEVENS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 401 252100010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANTHONY & AMY HORNING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 402 252070010 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFREY & JOAN TAM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 403 255500040 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFEREY SCHRIMPF 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 404 255500050 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY STORM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 405 255500060 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & ANGELA HOWE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 406 255500070 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & ELIZABETH SCAMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 407 255500080 SINGLE-FAMILY TERENCE MEYER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 408 255500090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY BRANDT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 409 255500100 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMES & JENNIFER DISNEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 410 255500110 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA MARIE SHENCK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 411 255500120 SINGLE-FAMILY JAY & KELLY BEAUDRY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 412 255500130 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID BENNETT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 413 255500140 SINGLE-FAMILY MEAGHAN & STEVEN VANDERSANDEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 414 255500150 SINGLE-FAMILY JAMI & KAREN SCHUPP 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 415 255500160 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & REBECCA OLSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 416 255500170 SINGLE-FAMILY ALEXANDR BEZVERKHNIY & GALINA ZAIKOVSKAYA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 417 255500180 SINGLE-FAMILY JOE SIMMONS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 418 255500190 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & KATHLEEN MAHANNAH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 419 255500200 SINGLE-FAMILY ROVERT & KATHY REIMLER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 420 255500210 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL HAWKINSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 421 255500220 SINGLE-FAMILY BRETT WILLIAMS & BRIDGET BURKEL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 422 255500230 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & JANN VARNER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 423 255500240 SINGLE-FAMILY NATALIE MARIE HARVEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 424 255500250 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 425 255500260 SINGLE-FAMILY JODI LATWOOD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 426 255500270 SINGLE-FAMILY ALBERT & JANINE AFFLITTO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 427 255500280 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & LESLIE MCKEAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 428 255500290 SINGLE-FAMILY KURT & MAIA KNOX 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 429 255500300 SINGLE-FAMILY JERRY & CAROL MCDONALD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 430 255500310 SINGLE-FAMILY GARY & SHARON HARRIS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 431 255500320 SINGLE-FAMILY RAJIV & KAVYYA DAMA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 432 255500330 SINGLE-FAMILY CARA BENOIT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 433 255500340 SINGLE-FAMILY YEAN CHING TAN & GIBSON NENE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 434 252080190 SINGLE-FAMILY KARIM & FAIDA MAMMADOVA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 435 252080180 SINGLE-FAMILY NATHAN & COLLEEN HATZUNG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 436 252080170 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & HEIDI NAUMAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 437 252080160 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY LUNDGREN-SMITH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 438 252080150 SINGLE-FAMILY BRADY HORMANN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 439 252080140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL KRUGER & DEBORAH ROBERTS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 440 252080130 SINGLE-FAMILY JASON & JEAN RUSINAK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 441 252080120 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSHUA & KELLI BILLS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 442 252080110 SINGLE-FAMILY JEFFERY & CATHERINE BRECKHEIMER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 443 252080100 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & TIFFANY KLINKENBERG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 444 252080090 SINGLE-FAMILY DELLY DEWITT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 445 252080080 SINGLE-FAMILY DEREK & JAMIE NELSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 446 252080070 SINGLE-FAMILY REBECCA KNEZEVIC 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 447 252080060 SINGLE-FAMILY JENNIFER & CRAIG RAUEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 448 252080050 SINGLE-FAMILY LEE & KAREN BORIL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 449 252080040 SINGLE-FAMILY TRISTAN & ADRIENNE AGRE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 450 252080030 SINGLE-FAMILY SARAH SWEDLUND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 451 252080020 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JAMIE MANNING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 452 252080010 SINGLE-FAMILY ANDREW & ELIZABETH GUSTAFSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 453 258070200 SINGLE-FAMILY MIKEAL BYSTROM JR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 454 258070190 SINGLE-FAMILY ALICIA JEAN PAVELKO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 455 258070180 SINGLE-FAMILY KELLY NEVERMANN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 456 258070170 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & CHELSEA MILLER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 457 258070160 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & ALISON BUICK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 458 258070150 SINGLE-FAMILY EVAN MARIASH & KELLY FIDGEON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 459 258070140 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & SARAH WENTZIEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 460 258090150 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & CHRISTINE STONE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 461 258090140 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & KENAN GUILMETTE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 462 258090130 SINGLE-FAMILY JOAN & BURTON BENSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 463 258070130 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & SARAH WAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 464 258070120 SINGLE-FAMILY DERRICK BILDERBEEK & DYAN PADGETT 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 465 258070110 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN & AMY KROLL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 466 258070100 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & JERILYN HOOKS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 467 258070090 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & TERRY DENUCCI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 468 258070080 SINGLE-FAMILY BENJAMIN & JEANNINE SMITH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 469 258580120 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JULIA NEWELL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 470 258580130 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JEANENE CONZEMIUS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 471 258580140 SINGLE-FAMILY KATHRYN & JOHN WILLIAMS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 472 258580150 SINGLE-FAMILY KASHIF HASAN & SHAHEEN IQBAL 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 473 258580160 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN ERICKSON & JENNIFER SMOLKA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 474 258070020 SINGLE-FAMILY WILLIAM & JILL JOHNSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 475 258070030 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHY & JEANNE PIETRINI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 476 258070040 SINGLE-FAMILY HOLLY & TONY FERRARO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 477 258070050 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KIMBERLY COREY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 478 258070060 SINGLE-FAMILY LINDA & TIMOTHY RUDE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 479 258070070 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & JILL RAMSEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 480 258650010 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & JILL KOKKINEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 481 258650020 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & LIZABETH MONTGOMERY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 482 258650030 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & JANE MCGINTY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 483 258650040 SINGLE-FAMILY MICHAEL & LAURA WILLIAMS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 484 258650050 SINGLE-FAMILY DOUGLAS & STEPHANIE HAALAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 485 258570110 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & SAMANTHA CASSIOPPI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 486 258570120 SINGLE-FAMILY STEVEN & JANE WARNER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 487 258570130 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & MELISSA SUNDBOOM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 488 258570140 SINGLE-FAMILY BRANDT & KATHY COLVILLE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 489 258570150 SINGLE-FAMILY IGOR & ANASTASIA ARKHIPENKOV 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 490 258570160 SINGLE-FAMILY ALYESKA PROPERTIES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 491 258570170 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & DEBORAH LEUY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 492 258650060 SINGLE-FAMILY MARC WITTENBERG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 493 258650070 SINGLE-FAMILY MATTHEW & TARA STONE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 494 258650080 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & AMY JOINER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 495 258650090 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & KATHERINE O'BRIEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 496 258650100 SINGLE-FAMILY STEPHEN & NANCY GIESE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 497 258650110 SINGLE-FAMILY IAN & SALLY SHEPHERD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 498 258650120 SINGLE-FAMILY THOMAS & LAURIE FLECK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 499 258640030 SINGLE-FAMILY BRIAN & PAMELA PITTENGER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 500 258640020 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA MURIEL LUND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 501 258640010 SINGLE-FAMILY LANDON & SARAH GUILDAY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 502 258580050 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY GOAD-OLSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 503 258580040 SINGLE-FAMILY CARL & ALEXIS FRIEDR 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 504 258580030 SINGLE-FAMILY KEVIN & BROOKE SLAMA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 505 258570090 SINGLE-FAMILY ADAM & ROBBIN SCHAFER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 506 258570100 SINGLE-FAMILY DANIEL & NICOLE CAMPION 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 507 258570180 SINGLE-FAMILY RAMON & PATRICIA CONTRERAS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 508 258570190 SINGLE-FAMILY TERESA HODNET 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 509 258580010 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & BARBARA ROY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 510 258580020 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBER & MARLYS SCHWABE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 511 252130010 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & JUNE BENTRUP 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 512 252130020 SINGLE-FAMILY CHRISTOPHER & EMILY STRONG 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 513 252130030 SINGLE-FAMILY CATHERINE & STEVEN NORRIS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 514 252130040 SINGLE-FAMILY ABIGAIL & JUSTIN KLOUS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 515 252130050 SINGLE-FAMILY JOSEPH & KAREN CASEY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 516 252130060 SINGLE-FAMILY BURCH & MARTHA SCHULTZ 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 517 252110140 SINGLE-FAMILY HPA JV BORROWER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 518 252110130 SINGLE-FAMILY TIMOTHTY & LORI DOSEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 519 252110120 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & MARGERITE BOROWSKI 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 520 252110110 SINGLE-FAMILY MARY JOAN LORENZEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 521 252110100 SINGLE-FAMILY REBEKAH DUNHAM 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 522 252110090 SINGLE-FAMILY CYNTHIA & JOHN PUGH 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 523 252110080 SINGLE-FAMILY JUSTIN & APRIL UELAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 524 252110070 SINGLE-FAMILY GREGORY & LEAH THOMPSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 525 252070020 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID CARLSON & CAROLE FICK 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 526 252100120 SINGLE-FAMILY SHANNA O'BRIEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 527 252100130 SINGLE-FAMILY JUDITH JAMES 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 528 252100140 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & MICAELA YANDA 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 529 252100150 SINGLE-FAMILY SEAN KNUTSEN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 530 252100160 SINGLE-FAMILY DAVID & SANDRA BUTLER 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 531 252090010 SINGLE-FAMILY CHERYL MAGERS 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 532 252090020 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT & CHERYL AYOTTE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 533 252090030 SINGLE-FAMILY PAUL & ANTOINETTE SCHRUPP 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 534 252090040 SINGLE-FAMILY CAMERON & CATHERINE GUTHRIE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 535 252090050 SINGLE-FAMILY MARK & DIANE RUGLAND 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 536 252090060 SINGLE-FAMILY KYLE JOHNSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 537 252090070 SINGLE-FAMILY TODD & LEE MORTENSON 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 538 255500470 SINGLE-FAMILY SCOTT STALMAN & KATHERIN GLYNN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 539 255500460 SINGLE-FAMILY NANCY ANN MYHRE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 540 255500450 SINGLE-FAMILY ROBERT DOHERTY 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 541 255500440 SINGLE-FAMILY RYAN WEINZIERL & LAUREN CALLAHAN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 542 255500430 SINGLE-FAMILY 101 SHASTA LLC 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 543 255500420 SINGLE-FAMILY MARNEE SHEPARD 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 544 255500410 SINGLE-FAMILY CARLTON & ANNE MOORE 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 545 255500400 SINGLE-FAMILY GLEN FEUERBORN 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 1,897,000.00$ 7,620.00$per REU PARCEL #PID #PROPERTY TYPE OWNER REU ROADWAY ASSESSMENT PERCENTAGE ROADWAY ASSESSMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ASSESSMENT Roadway Assessment CITY OF CHANHASSEN: 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION (C.P. 20-05) Total Estimated Roadway Cost PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - TRAPPERS PASS AREA 546 252070040 SINGLE-FAMILY LARRY & GAIL BEUNING 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 547 252070030 SINGLE-FAMILY JOHN & MARY GIOVINCO 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 548 255500370 SINGLE-FAMILY LISA & EDWARD ESTLOW 1 40% $ 3,048.00 3,048.00$ 249 TOTAL 758,952.00$Assessment Totals Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 A.2. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 2 A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 2 A.4. Project Area Conditions ....................................................................................................... 2 A.4.a. Subproject 1 (Kurvers, Choctaw) ............................................................................ 2 A.4.b. Subproject 2 (Minnewashta) .................................................................................. 2 A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 3 B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 4 B.1. Exploration Logs .................................................................................................................. 4 B.1.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................... 4 B.1.b. Geologic Origins ..................................................................................................... 4 B.2. Geologic Profile ................................................................................................................... 4 B.2.a. Pavement Materials ............................................................................................... 4 B.2.b. Geologic Materials ................................................................................................. 5 B.2.c. Groundwater .......................................................................................................... 7 B.3. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 8 B.4. GPR and Core Results .......................................................................................................... 9 C. Recommendations – Subproject 1 ................................................................................................. 15 C.1. Design and Construction Considerations .......................................................................... 15 C.1.a. Pavement Resurfacing and Reuse of Pavement Materials .................................. 15 C.1.b. Pavement Subgrades and Drainage ..................................................................... 16 C.2. Pavements ......................................................................................................................... 16 C.2.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofrolls ................................................................... 16 C.2.b. Backfill and Material Compaction ........................................................................ 17 C.2.c. Design Sections .................................................................................................... 17 C.2.d. Pavement Materials and Compaction .................................................................. 18 C.3. Construction Quality Control ............................................................................................ 19 C.3.a. Excavation Observations ...................................................................................... 19 C.3.b. Materials Testing .................................................................................................. 19 C.3.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll .............................................................................. 19 C.3.d. Cold Weather Precautions ................................................................................... 19 D. Recommendations – Subproject 2 ................................................................................................. 19 D.1. Design and Construction Considerations .......................................................................... 19 D.1.a. Utility Support and Impact of Groundwater ........................................................ 19 D.1.b. Pavement Subgrades and Drainage ..................................................................... 20 D.1.c. Subgrade Correction Area .................................................................................... 20 D.1.d. Reuse of Pavement Materials .............................................................................. 21 D.2. Pavements ......................................................................................................................... 21 D.2.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofrolls ................................................................... 21 D.2.b. Subgrade Correction Area Backfill ........................................................................ 22 D.2.c. Backfill and Material Compaction ........................................................................ 22 D.2.d. Design Sections .................................................................................................... 23 D.2.e. Pavement Materials and Compaction .................................................................. 24 D.3. Utilities .............................................................................................................................. 24 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page D.3.a. Subgrades and Trench Backfill ............................................................................. 24 D.3.b. Excavation Side Slopes ......................................................................................... 24 D.3.c. Selection, Placement, and Compaction of Backfill ............................................... 25 D.3.d. Excavation Dewatering ......................................................................................... 25 D.3.e. Corrosion Potential .............................................................................................. 25 D.4. Construction Quality Control ............................................................................................ 25 D.4.a. Excavation Observations ...................................................................................... 25 D.4.b. Materials Testing .................................................................................................. 25 D.4.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll .............................................................................. 26 D.4.d. Cold Weather Precautions ................................................................................... 26 E. Procedures...................................................................................................................................... 26 E.1. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 26 E.2. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 26 E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 26 E.2.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 26 E.3. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................................ 27 E.4. Ground Penetrating Radar ................................................................................................ 27 E.4.a. GPR Data Collection ............................................................................................. 27 E.4.b. GPR Analysis ......................................................................................................... 27 F. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 28 F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 28 F.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 28 F.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 28 F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 28 F.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 28 F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 29 F.3. Use of Report..................................................................................................................... 29 F.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 29 Appendix ESAL Calculation Soil Boring Location Sketches (two sheets) Log of Boring Sheets (ST-01 through ST-20) Descriptive Terminology of Soil GPR Outputs Pavement Design Output (Subproject 2 – Minnewashta) A. Introduction A.1. Project Description This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the proposed 2019 Street Resurfacing Project (City Project 19-01) in Chanhassen, Minnesota. City Project 19-01 will include improvements to three areas (two subprojects), described as follows: Subproject 1  Kurvers Point (Site 1; 0.61 miles) and Choctaw Circle (Site 2; 0.43 miles): pavement resurfacing, select curb and gutter replacement, and limited utility improvements.  We assume the spot utility improvements, if completed, will generally be 5 feet deep or less.  No traffic information was available. Given the residential nature of the streets, we have assumed the pavements will experience 50,000 equivalent single axle loads (ESALs) over a 20-year design period. Subproject 2  Minnewashta Parkway (Site 3; 1.57 miles): select curb and gutter replacement; localized subgrade corrections (near Red Cedar Point Road, adjacent to Lake Saint Joe); possible mill and overlay, reclaim/removal, or reconstruction with water main replacement and other limited utility improvements.  We assume any utility replacements will be less than 10 feet deep, and that they will be along the roadway between TH 5 and Kings Road.  MnDOT counts show average annual daily traffic (AADT) of 2,350 vehicles (2017) in the northern segment. With an “urban” distribution (defined by the Minnesota Department of Transportation [MnDOT] State Aid) and growth derived from the previous three traffic counts, we estimate Minnewashta Parkway will experience an estimated 299,000 ESALs over a 20-year design period. The traffic volumes and ESAL forecast is attached. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 2 A.2. Purpose The purpose of our evaluation was to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact, perform GPR, and provide geotechnical and pavement recommendations for the 2019 Street Resurfacing Project 19-01 in Chanhassen, Minnesota. A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents To facilitate our evaluation, we were provided with or reviewed the following information or documents:  A description of the scope and base map of the project area provided by City of Chanhassen in their request for proposal (RFP).  Geologic Atlas of Carver County available from the Minnesota Geological Survey.  Various publicly available sources of information, such as Google Earth® and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) LakeFinder.  MnDOT’s Traffic Mapping Application. A.4. Project Area Conditions A.4.a. Subproject 1 (Kurvers, Choctaw) Our experience and referenced documents suggest the most common soils underlying the Kurvers Point and Choctaw Circle project areas include glacial till. The streets of this subproject area are residential with bituminous surfaces and surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Topography in both areas is rolling. A.4.b. Subproject 2 (Minnewashta) Based on our referenced documents and experience, the native soils underlying the Subproject 2 area (Minnewashta) include glacial till with limited swamp and lacustrine deposits. Adjacent land use is residential. Minnewashta, a two-lane collector street, is currently surfaced with bituminous pavement and lined with concrete curb and gutter. The topography is rolling. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 3 A.5. Scope of Services Our scope of services for this project was originally submitted as a Proposal to Ms. Stephanie Smith of the City of Chanhassen, for which we received e-mail authorization to proceed on May 16, 2018. Tasks performed in accordance with our authorized scope of services included:  Clearing exploration locations of underground utilities.  Performing 20 penetration test borings (labeled ST-1 through ST-20) and extending them to nominal depths of 10 feet below the pavement surface. Borings ST-13 through ST-20 were performed for Subproject 1, and ST-1 through ST-12 on Subproject 2.  Providing signs and flaggers as needed to protect motorists and our field crew during drilling for Subproject 2.  Performing ground penetrating radar (GPR) testing on both directions on each project street.  As an alternative service, performing at least one core and hand auger boring per project area (Kurvers, Choctaw, and Minnewashta) to help verify GPR results and evaluate material conditions. Note that we were unable to perform the initial core for Minnewashta due to traffic; at the request of the City, we re-mobilized with traffic control to perform the original core (C-1) and two additional cores (C-4 and C-5).  Performing laboratory moisture content tests, mechanical analyses (#200 sieve only), and organic content tests on selected penetration test samples.  Preparing this report containing a CAD sketch, exploration logs, a summary of the geologic materials encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for subgrade preparation, pavement thickness design, and utility placement. Note that our scope did not include visual evaluation of the pavement surface condition. Exploration locations and surface elevations at the exploration locations were determined using GPS technology that utilizes MnDOT’s permanent GPS Virtual Reference Network (VRN). Our scope of services did not include environmental services or testing, and we did not train the personnel performing this evaluation to provide environmental services or testing. We can provide these services or testing at your request. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 4 B. Results B.1. Exploration Logs B.1.a. Log of Boring Sheets Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings are included in the Appendix. The logs identify and describe the geologic materials that were penetrated and present the results of penetration resistance tests, laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples retrieved from them, and groundwater measurements. Strata boundaries were inferred from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because sampling was not performed continuously, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The boundary depths shown likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may also occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. B.1.b. Geologic Origins Geologic origins assigned to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report were based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. B.2. Geologic Profile B.2.a. Pavement Materials The pavement material thicknesses measured in the borings on both projects are presented in Table 1. Additional pavement thickness results can be found in Section B.4 (GPR and Core Results). City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 5 Table 1. Pavement Thickness Summary Subproject Boring Street Pavement Thickness (in.) Notes Bituminous Aggregate Base* 2 ST-01 Minnewashta Parkway 5 1/2 15 ST-02 5 13 ST-03 6 14 ST-04 5 1/2 12 1/2 ST-05 5 1/2 12 ST-06 6 18+ 18 inches of apparent base to the beginning of first penetration test. Sampler driven from 2 to 3 1/2 feet appeared to penetrate additional bituminous pavement ST-07 6 14 1/2 ST-08 6 24 Aggregate appeared to extend to depth sampled with split-spoon ST-09 6 13 1/2 ST-10 6 11 1/2 ST-11 6 6 ST-12 5 1/2 18 1 ST-13 Choctaw Circle 6 7 1/2 ST-14 5 7 ST-15 Brule Circle 4 10 ST-16 Kurvers Pt Rd 5 1/2 8 1/2 ST-17 6 1/2 9 ST-18 Twin Maple Rd 5 1/2 8 1/2 ST-19 Kurvers Pt Rd 6 8 Geotextile fabric noted below aggregate ST-20 Willow View Curve 5 1/2 9 *”Aggregate base” was identified visually in the field as the layer below the bituminous pavement layer and does not imply conformance of the material to a particular gradation or specification (e.g. Class 5). B.2.b. Geologic Materials Tables 2 and 3 provide a summary of the soil boring results in the general order we encountered the strata on Subproject 1 and 2, respectively. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The Descriptive Terminology of Soil sheets in the Appendix include definitions of abbreviations used in the tables City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 6 For simplicity in this report, we define fill to mean existing, uncontrolled, or undocumented fill. Table 2. Subsurface Profile Summary, Subproject 1* Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification Range of Penetration Resistances Commentary and Details Pavement section N/A N/A  See Table 1. Fill SC, CL 4 to 10 blows per foot (BPF)  Present in ST-13, 14, 17 and 19.  Moisture condition generally moist.  Extended to depths between 2 and 7 feet where present.  Variable with some intermixed soils. Glacial till SM, CL 5 to 30 BPF  Moisture condition generally moist.  Consisted of mostly sandy lean clay, with limited silty sand, both with trace gravel.  Often brown and sometimes gray; some materials were rust-stained, indicating the occasional presence of water. Glacial outwash SP, SP-SM 17 to 33 BPF  Encountered only in ST-14.  Variable amounts of gravel; noted cobble at 10 feet.  Moisture condition was moist. Lacustrine (lakebed) deposits ML 9 BPF  Between 9 feet and termination depth (11 feet) in ST-16 only.  Gray, moist, loose sandy silt. *Abbreviations defined in the attached Descriptive Terminology of Soil sheets. Table 3. Subsurface Profile Summary, Subproject 2* Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification Range of Penetration Resistances Commentary and Details Pavement section N/A N/A  See Table 1. Fill SM, SC, CL 3 to 11 BPF  Mostly about 4 to 7 feet deep, where present; extended to 11 feet (termination) in ST-8.  Typically moist; occasionally wet (ST-8).  Sometimes slightly organic (ST-3; ST-12).  Highly variable, with soils intermixed; contained bituminous pieces at 2 feet in ST-2, and wood pieces in ST-8 at 10 feet.  Possible cobbles and boulders. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 7 Strata Soil Type - ASTM Classification Range of Penetration Resistances Commentary and Details Glacial till SM, CL 4 to 30 BPF  Moisture condition moist to wet.  Consisted of mostly sandy lean clay and some silty sand.  Brown and occasionally gray in color; generally medium or stiffer in consistency. Lacustrine (lakebed) and swamp deposits Pt, ML, CL 3 to 9 BPF  Present in ST-6 and ST-7 and ST-12.  Peat and organic silt/clay present in each case.  Encountered from 4 to 9 feet deep in ST-6, underlain by apparent glacial soils.  In ST-7 and ST-12, present at the boring termination depth in ST-11.  Heavily layered shoreline deposits in ST-12, with silty, sandy and organic soils all present. Glacial outwash SP 4 BPF  Encountered at termination depth in ST-5 only.  Present below the observed water table (moisture condition: wet). *Abbreviations defined in the attached Descriptive Terminology of Soil sheets. B.2.c. Groundwater We did not observe groundwater during our drilling for Subproject 1. Lotus Lake, west of the project areas, has an ordinary high water level (OHW) of 896.4 feet above MSL. Based on the boring elevations and moisture contents of the retrieved samples, it appears groundwater was likely below the depths explored. The mottled and rust-stained color of some of the glacial till soils, however, suggests groundwater may occasionally be present within some soil layers. Groundwater was observed during our drilling operations for Subproject 2 as shown in Table 4. Table 4. Groundwater Observation Summary, Subproject 2 Boring Surface Elevation (ft)* Observed Groundwater Depth (ft) Corresponding Groundwater Elevation (ft) ST-5 953 1/2 8** 945 1/2 ST-6 950 9 941 ST-7 951 7 944 ST-12 949 6 943 *Rounded to nearest 1/2 foot. **Water level observed at 3 feet after further auger penetration. See Log of Boring for details. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 8 MnDNR records show an OHW for Lake Minnewashta of 944.5 feet above mean sea level (MSL), which is consistent with our observations. Seasonal and annual fluctuations of groundwater should be anticipated. B.3. Laboratory Test Results Laboratory test results, including moisture content, organic content, and mechanical analysis (#200 sieve only) tests, are summarized in Table 5. Table 5. Laboratory Testing Results Borehole Subproject Depth %<#200 Sieve Water Content (%) Organic Content (%) ST-1 2 (Minnewashta) 2 1/2 -- 15 -- ST-3 5 -- 36 4 ST-5 5 -- 31 -- ST-6 5 -- 114 27 ST-6 10 -- 23 -- ST-7 5 -- 81 19 ST-7 7 1/2 -- 122 -- ST-8 5 -- 17 -- ST-8 10 -- 22 -- ST-12 1 (Kurvers, Choctaw) 2 1/2 -- 13 3 ST-12 5 -- 25 -- ST-13 5 -- 17 -- ST-15 2 1/2 -- 10 -- ST-17 2 1/2 -- 17 -- ST-19 2 1/2 -- 16 -- ST-20 2 1/2 56 17 -- The moisture contents of the non-organic soils (< 2 percent organic content by weight) varied significantly and were often above their likely optimum moisture contents for compaction. The elevated moisture contents of soils tested in ST-6 and ST-7 reflect the substantial organic component of these lacustrine and swamp-deposited soils. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 9 B.4. GPR and Core Results GPR was used to determine approximate pavement layer thicknesses along the streets. GPR data was collected at a nominal 1-foot interval in both travel directions on most roads; exceptions were short cul-de-sacs or circles, which were collected in a single direction. Where “ground-truth” data (pavement cores) were performed, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the pavement cores and hand auger borings to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis, with adjustments to the GPR as necessary to match the observed data. We have also included the approximate location of penetration test borings on the GPR figures, based on the GPS results of both, though offsets and the nature of measuring pavement thicknesses at boring locations make these thickness comparisons more approximate than with cores. Tables 6 and 7 provide the results based on our analysis using the RADAN software program. The Appendix shows the interpreted layer depth by foot along each street in the travel direction. Table 6. GPR Analysis Summary Statistics (BIT layer) Street Dir From To GPR Picked Length (ft) Bituminous layer thickness statistics (inches) Avg. 15th Pctle 5th Pctle Min Max Basswood Cir EB Kurvers Pt Rd North End 142 4.2 3.6 3.3 2.9 5.6 Brule Cir NB Choctaw Cir Cul-de-sac 502 5.1 4.5 4.1 3.9 7.5 Brule Cir SB Cul-de-sac Choctaw Cir 502 5.1 4.2 4.0 3.7 7.9 Choctaw Cir EB Cul-de-sac Chanhassen Rd 1599 5.3 4.4 3.7 2.7 9.1 Choctaw Cir WB Chanhassen Rd Cul-de-sac 1542 5.8 4.7 4.3 2.8 11.9 Kurvers Pt (Circle) SB North End South End 313 4.6 4.1 4.0 3.4 5.9 Kurvers Pt Rd NB Cul-de-sac Chanhassen Rd 1684 5.0 4.4 4.0 2.9 7.8 Kurvers Pt Rd SB Chanhassen Rd Cul-de-sac 1676 4.9 4.2 3.8 1.3 7.8 Twin Maple Rd EB Kurvers Point Rd Cul-de-sac 406 5.5 4.9 4.6 4.2 8.9 Twin Maple Rd WB Cul-de-sac Kurvers Point Rd 400 5.7 5.0 4.6 4.2 8.4 Willow View Curve WB Kurvers Point Rd Cul-de-sac 342 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.2 5.9 Minnewashta Pkwy NB TH 5 North County Line 8244 5.2 4.5 4.2 2.5 9.9 Minnewashta Pkwy SB North County Line TH 5 8214 5.1 4.4 4.1 3.4 9.5 City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 10 Table 7. GPR Analysis Summary Statistics (AGG layer) (where present) Street Dir From To GPR Picked Length (ft) Aggregate layer thickness statistics (inches) Avg. 15th Pctle 5th Pctle Min Max Basswood Cir EB Kurvers Pt Rd North End 142 14.0 13.0 12.3 11.1 17.7 Brule Cir NB Choctaw Cir Cul-de-sac 502 12.1 10.9 10.2 9.4 15.9 Brule Cir SB Cul-de-sac Choctaw Cir 502 12.1 11.0 10.6 9.2 15.9 Choctaw Cir EB Cul-de-sac Chanhassen Rd 1599 7.4 6.0 5.3 4.0 11.7 Choctaw Cir WB Chanhassen Rd Cul-de-sac 1542 6.6 4.8 3.3 1.6 11.4 Kurvers Pt (Circle) SB North End South End 313 13.8 12.3 11.5 10.3 17.9 Kurvers Pt Rd NB Cul-de-sac Chanhassen Rd 1684 -- -- -- -- -- Kurvers Pt Rd SB Chanhassen Rd Cul-de-sac 1676 -- -- -- -- -- Twin Maple Rd EB Kurvers Point Rd Cul-de-sac 406 9.4 7.9 7.1 5.8 13.6 Twin Maple Rd WB Cul-de-sac Kurvers Point Rd 400 8.1 7.1 6.6 5.8 11.0 Willow View Curve WB Kurvers Point Rd Cul-de-sac 342 -- -- -- -- -- Minnewashta Pkwy NB TH 5 North County Line 8244 15.8 12.2 10.6 8.5 23.2 Minnewashta Pkwy SB North County Line TH 5 8214 17.7 16.2 15.5 10.8 26.1 The apparent aggregate base in the GPR scan was often thicker than noted in the boreholes. We observed in some cases that multiple layers of similar granular material (base, subbase) often underlay the bituminous layer; these may have been difficult to differentiate in the side of the borehole. An example is Kurvers Point Road, where the borings on the northern half of the road showed a similar base section to the hand auger boring, including the noted geotextile layer. While no aggregate base was obvious in this portion of the GPR scan, the southern portion of Kurvers Point Road appeared to have a much deeper “base” than shown in the borings. In other cases, Minnewashta Parkway in particular, the apparent aggregate base layer was only visible in the GPR in select locations and may not represent the true average of the layer thickness. (On Willow View Curve, no aggregate base layer was obvious in the GPR data.) The GPR data attached to this report should be consulted to understand the GPR data and its potential limitations. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 11 We performed pavement coring and hand auger borings in five locations as shown below in Figures 1 through 3 and summarized in Table 8. We selected all locations based on GPR scan results. Figure 1. Approximate locations of Cores C-1, C-4, and C-5 on Minnewashta Parkway Figure 2. Approximate location of Core C-2 on Choctaw Circle City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 12 Figure 3. Approximate location of Core C-3 on Kurvers Point Road Table 8. Pavement Core and Hand Auger Results Street Core Bituminous Thickness (in.) Aggregate Base Thickness (in.) Notes Minnewashta Parkway C-1 5 -- Limestone aggregate base present; hand auger met refusal after partial penetration Choctaw Circle C-2 4 3/4 14 1/4 The identified aggregate base and underlying material (possible subbase) were similarly granular in composition Low-severity stripping in bottom inch Kurvers Point Road C-3 4 9 Core debonding and high-severity stripping likely affected recovered thickness. Geotextile present below aggregate base Minnewashta Parkway C-4 4 3/4 -- Limestone aggregate base present; hand auger met refusal after partial penetration Minnewashta Parkway C-5 6 -- Limestone aggregate base present; hand auger met refusal after partial penetration City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 13 Photos 1 through 5 show the cores. Photo 1. Core C-1 (Minnewashta Parkway) Photo 2. Core C-2 (Choctaw Circle) City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 14 Photo 3. Core C-3 (Kurvers Point Road) Photo 4. Core C-4 (Minnewashta Parkway) City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 15 Photo 5. Core C-5 (Minnewashta Parkway) Visible in Photo 2 is high-severity stripping, which can affect the constructability and service life of partial-depth pavement repairs such as mill and overlay. We recommend additional cores if such repairs are being considered. C. Recommendations – Subproject 1 C.1. Design and Construction Considerations C.1.a. Pavement Resurfacing and Reuse of Pavement Materials Our borings and GPR encountered a bituminous layer averaging about 5 1/2 inches thick over aggregate base ranging from about 7 to 10 inches. From a materials thickness and quality standpoint, it appears full-depth reclamation (FDR) can be utilized in order to obtain materials for aggregate base on the project. A proper reclamation depth will likely vary between about 10 and 12 inches. One possible limitation is the geotextile fabric noted in one boring and one core location in the Kurvers Point Road area near Twin Maple Road. The extent and precise depth of City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 16 this fabric is unknown. Reclamation extended into the fabric can cause equipment damage and substantially compromise the quality of reclaimed product, and we recommend exercising extreme caution or selecting another method of pavement removal if these risks are unacceptable. We recommend thorough quality control practices, including frequent sieve analyses of the reclaimed material, if the product will be reused directly on site as aggregate base or a stabilizing material with minimal processing. C.1.b. Pavement Subgrades and Drainage The pavement subgrades will consist of almost exclusively clayey materials. We anticipate the majority of the subgrade soils present beneath the existing roads will generally be suitable for pavement support. However, they are likely to be wet or become wet upon exposure and are likely to require additional work, such as moisture conditioning (drying), before they can be properly compacted. Removal and replacement, or various stabilization techniques, may prove to be a more efficient option in the event the soils are substantially over their optimum moisture contents. C.2. Pavements C.2.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofrolls For preparation of any exposed subgrades prior to placement of new pavement sections or reclaimed aggregate (see below), we recommend proofrolling the subgrade soils with a loaded tandem-axle truck. This will assist in identifying any soft or weak areas that will require additional soil correction work. Areas that yield or rut more than 1 inch due to wheel traffic, depending on conditions, should be corrected. Failed areas should be compacted, or if too wet, we recommend that the upper 1 to 2 feet of the resulting subgrade be scarified, dried to a moisture content not more than 2 percentage points above optimum, and compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). If there are areas that still cannot be compacted, we recommend subexcavating the unstable materials to a minimum depth of 1 to 2 feet depending on the outcome of the proofroll, as well replacement material. The soils should be replaced them with suitable, properly compacted materials such as select granular material, aggregate base or larger diameter crushed aggregate (“3-inch minus”). City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 17 C.2.b. Backfill and Material Compaction Our materials and compaction recommendations are provided in Tables 9 and 10. Table 9. Engineered Fill Materials Locations To Be Used Engineered Fill Classification Possible Soil Type Descriptions Gradation Additional Requirements  Drainage layer  Non-frost- susceptible MnDOT select granular GP, GW, SP, SW See MnDOT Spec 3149.2B2 -- Pavements Pavement subgrade fill Select grading material SP, SM, SC, CL 100% passing 3-inch sieve < 5% OC PI < 15%  Below utilities in wet soils  Over wet excavation bottoms Coarse aggregate bedding GP, GW, SP, SW See MnDOT Spec 3149.G2 -- Table 10. Compaction Recommendations Summary Reference Relative Compaction, percent (ASTM D698 – Standard Proctor) Moisture Content Variance from Optimum, percentage points < 12% Passing #200 Sieve (typically SP, SP-SM)* > 12% Passing #200 Sieve (typically CL, SC, ML, SM) Within 3 feet of pavement subgrade 100 ±3 -1 to +3 More than 3 feet below pavement subgrade; utilities 95 ±3 ±3 *Alternatively, use the MnDOT Penetration Index Method C.2.c. Design Sections Table 11 shows the City of Chanhassen Typical Residential Street Section (Plate No. 5200). In our opinion, this section is suitable for reconstructed pavements required within Subproject 1. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 18 Table 11. City of Chanhassen Residential Bituminous Pavement Section Layer Thickness (in.) MnDOT Specification/Designation Bituminous wear 2 (1 lift) SPWEA340C Bituminous non-wear 2 (1 lift) SPNWB330B (can substitute the wear material above to simplify construction) Aggregate base (Class 5) (or reclaim) 12 3138 (or 3135, for more lenient requirements for reclaimed material) Subbase (select granular borrow) 24 3149 If the pavements will be reclaimed in place, recompacted and repaved, a 4-inch section as shown in Table 11 will be adequate for the design traffic. This will require removal and stockpiling of the reclaimed material or removal of 4 inches of the reclaimed material to accommodate the bituminous pavements. We recommend a minimum thickness of aggregate base (reclaim + residual aggregate) of 8 inches. The evaluation of mill and overlay or similar partial-depth pavement rehabilitation would require a detailed visual survey of the pavement surface condition and numerous cores to assess bituminous material condition. This work was outside the scope of our evaluation. C.2.d. Pavement Materials and Compaction We recommend specifying pavement materials as recommended in Table 11. We recommend compacting the aggregate base or reclaim materials to meet the requirements of MnDOT specification 2211.3.D.2.c. (Penetration Index Method). We recommend compacting bituminous pavements to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical Rice density per the Maximum Density Method (specification 2360.3.D.1), with bituminous materials and placement practices meeting the requirements of MnDOT Specification 2360. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 19 C.3. Construction Quality Control C.3.a. Excavation Observations We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparation, and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the competence of the geologic materials exposed in the excavations and the adequacy of required excavation oversizing. C.3.b. Materials Testing We recommend density tests be taken in excavation backfill and additional required fill placed below pavements and utilities. This includes DCP tests for aggregate base or reclaim and imported granular materials. We recommend Gyratory tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids and density tests to evaluate compaction. C.3.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll We recommend that proofrolling of the pavement subgrades be observed by a geotechnical engineer to determine if the results of the procedure meet project specifications and to delineate the extent of additional pavement subgrade preparation work that may be necessary. C.3.d. Cold Weather Precautions If site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading. No fill should be placed on frozen subgrades. No frozen soils should be used as fill. D. Recommendations – Subproject 2 D.1. Design and Construction Considerations D.1.a. Utility Support and Impact of Groundwater The reuse of the utility trench backfill soils will have potential impacts on the pavement subgrades. If the backfill is not properly compacted, there is the potential for subgrade instability and settlement (and premature deterioration) of the driving surface. We anticipate the trench soils will consist mostly of clayey soils, with some stretches of softer lacustrine (lakebed) soils and swamp deposits. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 20 It is likely the clayey soils will need to be dried to achieve the levels of compaction recommended for utility support. Clayey trench soils that are exposed to moisture will be more susceptible to strength loss and may also become unstable, which will require moisture conditioning or removal and replacement with suitable soils. Soils containing greater than 80 percent silt and soils with greater than 5 percent organic content encountered in any trenches should be removed from the project and replaced with a suitable material. Groundwater was present in the borings near the lake crossing (ST-6, 7, and 8) and near the north terminus of the project (ST-12). For utilities installed in these areas, a coarse aggregate bedding material could be used to help overcome wet or saturated soil conditions. D.1.b. Pavement Subgrades and Drainage Outside of the potential subgrade correction area (described below), the majority of subgrade soils on Minnewashta Parkway will be clayey till soils, which are suitable for pavement support but susceptible to strength loss from additional water and traffic. The tested moisture contents suggest that many of these soils are over their optimum moisture contents for compaction and will require drying, removal and replacement, or stabilization techniques in order to support pavements. D.1.c. Subgrade Correction Area The thickness of the in-place aggregate section in ST-6 through ST-8 (including possible buried pavement in ST-6), it is likely that consolidation of the swamp-deposited, compressible organic soils have been the primary contributor to poor pavement performance in the area. There are a few options for reducing settlement:  Full replacement of undocumented fill and swamp-deposited soils (Option 1).  Partial soil correction (Option 2).  Alternative construction techniques, such as lightweight fill (Option 3). Given the limited depth of the swamp-deposited soils, which extended from 6 to 9 feet in ST-6 and ST-7, the most complete approach for the lowest relative cost will be Option 1. The soft clayey fill soils in ST-8 extended to boring termination; to limit cost and due to likely constrains on excavation limits, some of these soils may need to be left in place. Completely removing these soils by open cut methods would very likely require laying back slopes past the west side curb. We assume instead that trench boxes or other temporary retention will be used; in that case, we recommend removing as much of the unsuitable soils as possible with the selected option. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 21 We recommend a minimum longitudinal transition of 20:1 (horizontal:vertical) to avoid abrupt transitions and associated changes in subgrade and pavement performance. To reduce subgrade moisture and improve pavement performance, drain tile can be placed in the new backfill in the subgrade correction area, assuming there is sufficient elevation and profile to outlet the water to headwalls daylighted in the slope or existing storm sewer. Tile should be placed at the bottom of the subbase (select granular) layer in the pavement. D.1.d. Reuse of Pavement Materials Our borings and GPR encountered a bituminous layer averaging nearly between about 5 and 6 inches thick, typically with more than 12 inches of underlying aggregate base (according to the borings; as identified by samples from borings and hand auger borings, this material was similar to a limestone aggregate base). This should be considered sufficient for full-depth reclamation (FDR) of Minnewashta Parkway to depths of 12 inches or greater. We recommend thorough quality control practices, including frequent sieve analyses of the reclaimed material, if the product will be reused directly on site as aggregate base or a stabilizing material with minimal processing. D.2. Pavements D.2.a. Subgrade Preparation and Proofrolls For preparation of any exposed subgrades prior to placement of new pavement sections or reclaimed aggregate (see below), we recommend proofrolling the subgrade soils or reclaimed aggregate with a loaded tandem-axle truck. This will assist in identifying any soft or weak areas that will require additional soil correction work. Areas that yield or rut more than 1 inch due to wheel traffic, depending on conditions, should be corrected. Failed areas should be compacted, or if too wet, we recommend that the upper 1 to 2 feet of the resulting subgrade be scarified, dried to a moisture content not more than 2 percentage points above optimum, and compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). If there are areas that still cannot be compacted, we recommend subexcavating the unstable materials to a minimum depth of 1 to 2 feet depending on the outcome of the proofroll, as well replacement material. The soils should be replaced with suitable, properly compacted materials such as Select Granular Material (MnDOT 3149.2B2), aggregate base or larger diameter crushed aggregate (“3-inch minus”). City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 22 D.2.b. Subgrade Correction Area Backfill We initially recommend backfilling over the wet or submerged excavation bottoms with coarse aggregate bedding or similar soil as referenced in Table 13. MnDOT “select” materials (< 12 percent passing a #200 sieve) can also be used, but may be slightly more difficult to compact in wet conditions. We anticipate these materials will need to be imported. In general, clayey soils will be extremely difficult to work with “in the wet” and sand should be considered for backfill that will be placed below the groundwater surface if significant dewatering is not performed. Sumps or other means of dewatering will likely to be necessary to aid in backfill placement. Above the water table, on-site soils free of organic soil and debris can be considered for reuse as backfill and fill. The clayey and silty fill and glacial till will be more difficult to compact if wet or allowed to become wet, or if spread and compacted over wet surfaces. Imported material needed to replace excavation spoils or balance cut and fill quantities may consist of sand, silty sand, clayey sand, sandy lean clay or lean clay. We recommend, however, that the plastic index of these materials not exceed 15. D.2.c. Backfill and Material Compaction Our materials and compaction recommendations are provided in Tables 12 and 13. Table 12. Engineered Fill Materials Locations To Be Used Engineered Fill Classification Possible Soil Type Descriptions Gradation Additional Requirements  Drainage layer  Non-frost- susceptible MnDOT select granular GP, GW, SP, SW See MnDOT Spec 3149.2B2 -- Pavements Pavement subgrade fill Select grading material SP, SM, SC, CL 100% passing 3-inch sieve < 5% OC PI < 15%  Below utilities in wet soils  Over wet excavation bottoms Coarse aggregate bedding GP, GW, SP, SW See MnDOT Spec 3149.G2 -- City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 23 Table 13. Compaction Recommendations Summary Reference Relative Compaction, percent (ASTM D698 – Standard Proctor) Moisture Content Variance from Optimum, percentage points < 12% Passing #200 Sieve (typically SP, SP-SM)* > 12% Passing #200 Sieve (typically CL, SC, ML, SM) Within 3 feet of pavement subgrade 100 ±3 -1 to +3 More than 3 feet below pavement subgrade; utilities 95 ±3 ±3 *Alternatively, use the MnDOT Penetration Index Method D.2.d. Design Sections We used MnDOT’s MnPAVE-Flexible software to estimate the required pavement thickness for Minnewashta Parkway at the estimated 20-year ESALs (299,000). We assumed a “clay loam” subgrade (similar to the sandy lean clay encountered) and first evaluated the City of Chanhassen Typical Residential Street Section (Plate No. 5200). MnPAVE-Flexible indicates possible failure of this section during the critical spring thaw period with only 4 inches of bituminous pavement; we therefore recommend increasing the bituminous thickness to 5 inches as shown below in Table 14. Table 14. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Section, Minnewashta Reconstruction Layer Thickness (in.) MnDOT Specification/Designation Bituminous wear 3 (2 lifts) SPWEA340C Bituminous non-wear 2 (1 lift) SPNWB330B (can substitute the wear material above to simplify construction) Aggregate base (Class 5) (or reclaim) 12 3138 (or 3135, for more lenient requirements for reclaimed material) Subbase (select granular borrow) 24 3149 (can be reduced in thickness to 12 inches with no effect on pavement life) City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 24 If the pavements will be reclaimed in place, recompacted and repaved, a 5-inch bituminous section as shown in Table 14 should be used. This will require removal and stockpiling of the reclaimed material or removal of 5 inches of the reclaimed material to accommodate the bituminous pavements. We recommend a minimum thickness of aggregate base (reclaim + residual aggregate) of 10 inches. D.2.e. Pavement Materials and Compaction We recommend specifying pavement materials as recommended in Table 14. We recommend compacting the aggregate base or reclaim materials to meet the requirements of MnDOT specification 2211.3.D.2.c. (Penetration Index Method). We recommend compacting bituminous pavements to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical Rice density per the Maximum Density Method (specification 2360.3.D.1), with bituminous materials and placement practices meeting the requirements of MnDOT Specification 2360. D.3. Utilities D.3.a. Subgrades and Trench Backfill The native glacial till soils encountered at likely utility elevations generally appear suitable for pipe and utility structure support and we anticipate that utilities can be installed per manufacturer bedding requirements. However, we encountered wet, clayey lakebed/swamp deposited soils in several borings within the proposed utility alignment; soils such as these will have limited stability and are not generally suitable for backfill or utility support. We recommend providing a contingency for further subcutting and soil replacement of utility backfill soils in such soils. This may already include soils that will be removed as part of the subgrade correction area described in Section D.2.b. of this report. At pipe elevations, we recommend a minimum subcut and replacement with MnDOT coarse aggregate bedding; this depth may need to be increased to two feet or more if the soils are particularly wet or soft. A geotechnical engineer should observe all utility trench excavations and subcuts. D.3.b. Excavation Side Slopes The project area soils appear to meet OSHA Type A, B and C requirements. We recommend constructing excavation side slopes to lie back at a horizontal to vertical slope of 1 1/2 to 1 or flatter. In significant depths of organic soils these side slopes may be need to made flatter or supplemental support may be necessary. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 25 All excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations and Trenches.” This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Reference to these OSHA requirements should be included in the project specifications. Trenches deeper than 20 feet must be designed by a professional engineer. D.3.c. Selection, Placement, and Compaction of Backfill We recommend compacting backfill placed above and below utilities as shown in Table 13. D.3.d. Excavation Dewatering We recommend removing groundwater from the utility excavations if encountered and removing any water that seeps into excavations from sidewalls or the adjacent site work. Sumps and pumps will generally be suitable for short-term, small-scale water removal under the soil conditions likely to be encountered for this project. Alternative approaches should be considered for long-term or large-scale groundwater removal, particularly in proximity to the lakes and at low points. The contractor should develop a groundwater control plan for review by the engineer and project team. D.3.e. Corrosion Potential Clayey soils were present at likely utility depths, which are considered at least moderately corrosive to ductile iron pipe. We recommend corrosion protection or the use of corrosion-resistant pipe material if utilities will be bedded within such soils, particularly if they will be in close proximity to static groundwater over the long term. D.4. Construction Quality Control D.4.a. Excavation Observations We recommend having a geotechnical engineer observe all excavations related to subgrade preparation, and pavement construction. The purpose of the observations is to evaluate the competence of the geologic materials exposed in the excavations and the adequacy of required excavation oversizing. D.4.b. Materials Testing We recommend density tests be taken in excavation backfill and additional required fill placed below pavements and utilities. This includes DCP tests for aggregate base or reclaim and imported granular materials. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 26 We recommend Gyratory tests on bituminous mixes to evaluate strength and air voids and density tests to evaluate compaction. D.4.c. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll We recommend that proofrolling of the pavement subgrades be observed by a geotechnical engineer to determine if the results of the procedure meet project specifications and to delineate the extent of additional pavement subgrade preparation work that may be necessary. D.4.d. Cold Weather Precautions If site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading. No fill should be placed on frozen subgrades. No frozen soils should be used as fill. E. Procedures E.1. Penetration Test Borings The penetration test borings were drilled with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow-stem auger. The borings were performed in accordance with ASTM D 1586. Penetration test samples were taken at 2 1/2-foot intervals and are shown on the boring logs. E.2. Material Classification and Testing E.2.a. Visual and Manual Classification The geologic materials encountered were visually and manually classified in accordance with ASTM Standard Practice D 2488. A chart explaining the classification system is attached. Samples were placed in jars or bags and returned to our facility for review and storage. E.2.b. Laboratory Testing The results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples are noted on or follow the appropriate attached exploration logs. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM or AASHTO procedures. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 27 E.3. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater as the penetration test borings were advanced and again after auger withdrawal. The boreholes were then backfilled as noted on the boring logs. E.4. Ground Penetrating Radar E.4.a. GPR Data Collection GPR data was collected on May 29, 2018. GPR collection occurred at posted speed limits and data was recorded along each street in the direction indicated in Table 6 of this report. Scans of the pavement were collected according to GSSI, Inc. (manufacturer) SIR-20 processor settings at a specified interval of approximately one scan per lineal foot in a single travel direction. A calibration file, required for data post-processing, was collected at the onset of testing. Linear distance along the roadway was measured using a wheel-mounted Distance Measuring Instrument (DMI). GPS data was also collected. E.4.b. GPR Analysis Data collected by the GPR unit was returned to our office and analyzed to estimate the pavement thickness, and where possible, the thickness of underlying pavement and/or aggregate base. Pavement layer interpretation was accomplished using RADAN 7.4, a software package included with the GSSI RoadScan system. The software includes tools to aid in delineating pavement layer transitions and automatically calculates their depths from the pavement surface using the calibration file(s) collected prior to or following testing. Where “ground-truth” data (cores or borings) were collected, the interpreted layers from the GPR scan were compared directly to the measured thicknesses from the cores or borings to validate the accuracy of the GPR analysis. These locations are shown on the GPR figures; in the case of borings, the locations should be considered approximate. The bituminous pavement was repaired with a cold-mix bituminous patch immediately after coring. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 28 F. Qualifications F.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions F.1.a. Material Strata Our evaluation, analyses, and recommendations were developed from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations continuously with depth, and therefore strata boundaries and thicknesses must be inferred to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and can be expected to vary in depth, elevation, and thickness away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until additional exploration work is completed, or construction commences. If any such variations are revealed, our recommendations should be re-evaluated. Such variations could increase construction costs, and a contingency should be provided to accommodate them. F.1.b. Groundwater Levels Groundwater measurements were made under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. It should be noted that the observation periods were relatively short, and groundwater can be expected to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications, and other seasonal and annual factors. F.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility F.2.a. Plan Review This report is based on a limited amount of information, and a number of assumptions were necessary to help us develop our recommendations. It is recommended that our firm review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications, and evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs and specifications. City of Chanhassen Project B1804714 January 10, 2019 Page 29 F.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing It is recommended that we be retained to perform observations and tests during construction. This will allow correlation of the subsurface conditions encountered during construction with those encountered by the borings, and provide continuity of professional responsibility. F.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the parties to which it has been addressed. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses, and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. F.4. Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Appendix Instructions: All yellow boxes require an input value. Dropdown choices are provided for Base Year (C18), Number of Lanes (C19), and Urban or Rural (C21). You must click on cells C18, C19, and C21 to access the dropdown choices. General Information Date Forecast Performed by Name of County or City Project Number Project Description Route Number Base Year (i.e. opening to traffic)2019 Number of Lanes (total both directions)2 = typical 2 lane Current AADT Urban or Rural Urban Historical AADT (enter a minimum of two years)Year AADT Enter oldest traffic data here 2013 2,200 Enter second oldest traffic data here 2015 2,150 Enter third oldest traffic data here 2017 2,350 Enter fourth oldest traffic data here Base Year AADT 2019 2,380 20-Year AADT 2039 3,130 35-Year AADT 2054 3,700 Growth Rate Vehicle Class %Flexible Rigid 2AX-6TIRE SU 1.37%0.25 0.24 3AX+SU 0.06%0.58 0.85 3AX TST 0.09%0.39 0.37 4AX TST 0.18%0.51 0.53 5AX+TST 1.45%1.13 1.89 TR TR, BUSES 0.67%0.57 0.74 TWIN TRAILERS 0.00%2.40 2.33 Total 3.83%NA NA 20-Year Flexible Forecast (10 Ton) =299,000 20-Year Rigid Forecast (10 Ton) =443,000 35-Year Flexible Forecast (10 Ton) =566,000 35-Year Rigid Forecast (10 Ton) =839,000 Revised: 4/16/2018 State Aid 10 Ton ESAL Traffic Forecast Calculator For State Aid questions and information concerning this tool, please contact State Aid Pavement Engineer Joel Ulring at joel.ulring@state.mn.us or 651-366-3831. 7/20/2018 NGL/Braun Intertec Chanhassen Braun Intertec project B1804714 Vehicle Type ESAL Factors 1.58% Minnewashta Parkway (City Project 19-01) MSAS 111 This ESAL calculator is for use with default Heavy Commerical Traffic values; click "User Defined Traffic Values" sheet below if you wish to enter your own Heavy Commercial Traffic values. 11 8 11 20 15 5 1/2 inches of bituminous. 15 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, dark brown and gray, moist. CLAYEY SAND, trace Gravel, brown and gray, moist, medium to very stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL SC Benchmark: Elevations were obtained using GPS and the State of Minnesota's permanent base station network. 985.7 984.4 982.1 975.1 0.4 1.7 4.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 183563, E: 537042. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-1 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-1 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 986.1 0.0 Depth feet 7 5 5 6 5 inches of bituminous. 13 inches of aggregate base. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray, moist, medium. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 7 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG CL 981.3 980.2 970.7 0.4 1.5 11.0 LOCATION: N: 183986, E: 537286. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-2 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-2 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 981.7 0.0 Depth feet 6 8 8 10 36 6 inches of bituminous. 14 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, with pieces of bituminous, dark brown and brown, moist. FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, slightly organic, dark brown to black, moist. CLAYEY SAND, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium. (Glacial Till) SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray, moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL FILL SC CL OC=4% 963.9 962.7 960.4 957.4 955.4 953.4 0.5 1.7 4.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 184494, E: 537377. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-3 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-3 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 964.4 0.0 Depth feet 9 13 14 22 5 1/2 inches of bituminous. 12 1/2 inches of aggregate base. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, moist, stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG CL SM CL 961.8 960.7 958.2 954.2 951.2 0.4 1.5 4.0 8.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 184965, E: 537691. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-4 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-4 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 962.2 0.0 Depth feet 7 4 5 4 31 5 1/2 inches of bituminous. 12 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Clayey Sand, trace Gravel, brown and dark brown, moist. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray, wet, soft to medium. (Glacial Till) POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, wet, very loose. (Glacial Outwash) END OF BORING. Water observed at 8 feet with 7 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Water observed at 3 feet with 9 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL CL SP An open triangle in the water level (WL) column indicates the depth at which groundwater was observed while drilling. Groundwater levels fluctuate. 953.2 952.1 949.6 944.6 942.6 0.4 1.5 4.0 9.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 185705, E: 537833. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-5 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-5 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 953.6 0.0 Depth feet 9 6 11 4 114 23 6 inches of bituminous. 18 inches of aggregate base. Possible bituminous pavement and aggregate base retrieved in split spoon sampler. PEAT, dark brown to black, moist. (Swamp Deposit) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, dark brown to gray, wet, medium dense. (Lacustrine Deposit) SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray, wet, soft. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water observed at 9 feet with 9 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL PT SM CL OC=27% 949.7 948.2 946.2 944.2 941.2 939.2 0.5 2.0 4.0 6.0 9.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 185975, E: 537898. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-6 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-6 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 950.2 0.0 Depth feet 7 6 3 6 81 122 6 inches of bituminous. 14 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, gray and dark brown, moist. ORGANIC SILT, with lenses of Peat and Organic Clay, black to dark brown and gray, wet. (Swamp Deposit) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, gray and brown, wet, loose. (Lacustrine Deposit) END OF BORING. Water observed at 7 feet with 9 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL OL SM OC=19% 950.3 949.1 946.8 941.8 939.8 0.5 1.7 4.0 9.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 186111, E: 537933. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-7 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-7 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 950.8 0.0 Depth feet 9 2 3 4 17 22 6 inches of bituminous. 24 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Clayey Sand, trace Gravel, gray, moist. FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and gray, moist to 10 feet then wet. With pieces of wood at 10 feet. END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL FILL 951.4 949.4 947.9 940.9 0.5 2.5 4.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 186314, E: 537972. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-8 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-8 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 951.9 0.0 Depth feet 11 10 14 12 6 inches of bituminous. 13 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, dark brown and brown, moist. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, grayish brown, moist to 10 feet then wet, medium dense. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL SP SM 953.4 952.3 948.9 946.9 942.9 0.5 1.6 5.0 7.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 187016, E: 537990. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-9 5/29/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-9 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 953.9 0.0 Depth feet 8 15 18 30 6 inches of bituminous. 11 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, brown and dark brown, moist. SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with Gravel, brown with iron stains, moist, very stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL SM CL 971.4 970.4 967.9 964.9 960.9 0.5 1.5 4.0 7.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 187957, E: 538234. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-10 5/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-10 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 971.9 0.0 Depth feet 7 9 14 21 6 inches of bituminous. 6 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, dark brown and brown, moist. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown to 7 feet then gray, moist, stiff to very stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 8 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. PAV AGG FILL CL 961.1 960.6 957.6 950.6 0.5 1.0 4.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 188847, E: 538706. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-11 5/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-11 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 961.6 0.0 Depth feet 8 9 8 5 5 6 5 1/2 inches of bituminous. 18 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Clayey Sand, slightly organic, trace Gravel, dark brown to black, moist. SILT with SAND, gray and brown, moist, loose. (Lacustrine Deposit) POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, brown, wet, loose. (Lacustrine Deposit) ORGANIC SILT, dark brown to black, wet, medium. (Lacustrine Deposit) POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, brownish gray, wet, loose. (Lacustrine Deposit) SILT with SAND, with lenses of Lean Clay, gray and brown, wet, loose. (Lacustrine Deposit) END OF BORING Water observed at 6 feet with 14 1/2 feet of hollow-stem auger in the ground. Boring then grouted. BIT AGG FILL ML SP OL SP ML 948.4 946.9 943.8 941.8 939.8 936.8 934.8 932.8 0.4 1.9 5.0 7.0 9.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 LOCATION: N: 189947, E: 538656. Subproject 2. See attached sketch. ST-12 5/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-12 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 948.8 0.0 Depth feet 6 4 7 8 17 6 inches of bituminous. 7 1/2 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Clayey Sand, trace Gravel, with lenses of Lean Clay, dark brown and brown, moist. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL CL 943.9 943.3 937.4 933.4 0.5 1.1 7.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 187895, E: 562798. Subproject 1. See attached sketch. ST-13 5/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-13 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 944.4 0.0 Depth feet 17 19 27 33 5 inches of bituminous. 7 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Clayey Sand, trace Gravel, brown, moist. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense to dense. (Glacial Outwash) Occasional Cobbles encountered at 10 feet. END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL SP 913.0 912.4 911.4 902.4 0.4 1.0 2.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 187571, E: 563297. Subproject 1. See attached sketch. ST-14 5/30/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-14 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 913.4 0.0 Depth feet 11 13 8 9 10 4 inches of bituminous. 10 inches of aggregate base. SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Lean Clay, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Till) SANDY LEAN CLAY, with lenses of Silty Sand, brown, moist, medium. (Glacial Till) SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, trace Gravel, with lenses of Silty Sand, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 8 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG SM CL SM 918.9 918.0 912.2 910.2 908.2 0.3 1.2 7.0 9.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 187749, E: 563514. Subproject 1. See attached sketch. ST-15 5/31/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-15 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 919.2 0.0 Depth feet 6 9 8 9 5 1/2 inches of bituminous. 8 1/2 inches of aggregate base. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray, moist, medium to stiff. (Glacial Till) SANDY SILT, gray, moist, loose. (Lacustrine Deposit) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG CL ML 924.3 923.5 915.7 913.7 0.4 1.2 9.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 184147, E: 563368. Subproject 1. See attached sketch. ST-16 5/31/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-16 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 924.7 0.0 Depth feet 9 12 10 10 17 6 1/2 inches of bituminous. 9 inches of aggregate base. FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, dark brown and brown, moist. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL CL 917.2 916.4 913.7 906.7 0.5 1.3 4.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 184595, E: 563259. Subproject 1. See attached sketch. ST-17 5/31/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-17 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 917.7 0.0 Depth feet 6 5 8 10 5 1/2 inches of bituminous. 8 1/2 inches of aggregate base. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium to stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG CL 926.9 926.1 916.3 0.4 1.2 11.0 LOCATION: N: 184792, E: 563384. Subproject 1. See attached sketch. ST-18 5/31/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-18 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 927.3 0.0 Depth feet 10 14 12 14 16 6 inches of bituminous. 8 inches of aggregate base.* FILL: Sandy Lean Clay, trace Gravel, dark brown and gray, moist. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray with occasional iron stains, moist, stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG FILL CL *Geotextile fabric present below aggregate base. 910.8 910.1 907.3 900.3 0.5 1.2 4.0 11.0 LOCATION: N: 185098, E: 563244. Subproject 1. See attached sketch. ST-19 5/31/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-19 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 911.3 0.0 Depth feet 6 11 22 30 5617 5 1/2 inches of bituminous. 9 inches of aggregate base. SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace Gravel, brown and gray with occasional iron stains, moist, medium to very stiff. (Glacial Till) END OF BORING. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 9 1/2 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. Boring then backfilled. BIT AGG CL 926.6 925.8 916.0 0.4 1.2 11.0 LOCATION: N: 185291, E: 563480. Subproject 1. See attached sketch. ST-20 5/31/18 1" = 4'DATE:METHOD: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) ST-20 page 1 of 1 3 1/4" HSA, AutohammerJ. Chermak BORING: SCALE:DRILLER: Tests or NotesWL L O G O F B O R I N G BPF (See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations)Braun Intertec CorporationB1804714LOG OF BORING N:\GINT\PROJECTS\AX PROJECTS\2018\04714.GPJ BRAUN_V8_CURRENT.GDT 7/31/18 13:19Braun Project B1804714 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Chanhassen City Project 19-01 Kurvers Point, Cochtaw Circle, Minnewashta Chanhassen, Minnesota P200 % MC % ASTM Symbol Elev. feet 927.0 0.0 Depth feet Descriptive Terminology of Soil Based on Standards ASTM D 2487-11/2488-09a (Unified Soil Classification System) Group Symbol Group NameB Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D GW Well-graded gravelE Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D GP Poorly graded gravelE Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelE F G Fines Classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelE F G Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D SW Well-graded sandI Cu < 6 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D SP Poorly graded sandI Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandF G I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandF G I CL Lean clayK L M PI < 4 or plots below "A" lineJ ML SiltK L M Organic OL CH Fat clayK L M MH Elastic siltK L M Organic OH PT Peat Highly Organic Soils Silts and Clays (Liquid limit less than 50) Silts and Clays (Liquid limit 50 or more) Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor Inorganic Inorganic PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" lineJ PI plots on or above "A" line PI plots below "A" line Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA Soil Classification Coarse-grained Soils (more than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve)Fine-grained Soils (50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve) Sands (50% or more coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve) Clean Gravels (Less than 5% finesC) Gravels with Fines (More than 12% finesC) Clean Sands (Less than 5% finesH) Sands with Fines (More than 12% finesH) Gravels (More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve) Liquid Limit −oven dried Liquid Limit −not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M N Organic silt K L M O Liquid Limit −oven dried Liquid Limit −not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M P Organic silt K L M Q Particle Size Identification Boulders.............. over 12" Cobbles................ 3" to 12" Gravel Coarse............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm) Fine................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm) Sand Coarse.............. No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm) Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm) Fine.................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm) Silt........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm Clay...................... < .005 mm Relative ProportionsL, M trace............................. 0 to 5% little.............................. 6 to 14% with.............................. ≥ 15% Inclusion Thicknesses lens............................... 0 to 1/8" seam............................. 1/8" to 1" layer.............................. over 1" Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense.............. 11 to 30 BPF Dense............................ 31 to 50 BPF Very dense.................... over 50 BPF A.Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve. B.If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay D.Cu = D60 / D10 Cc = 𝐷30 2 / (𝐷10 𝑥𝐷60) E.If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. F.If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM or SC-SM. G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. H. Sands with 5 to 12%fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt SW-SC well-graded sand with clay SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay I.If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL-ML, silty clay. K.If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is predominant. L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line. O. PI < 4 or plots below “A” line. P. PI plots on or above “A” line. Q.PI plots below “A” line Laboratory Tests DD Dry Density,pcf OC Organic content, %PL Plastic limit, % WD Wet Density, pcf qp Pocket penetrometer strength LL Liquid limit, % P200 % Passing #200 sieve MC Moisture conent, %PI Plasticity Index, % Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength Very soft................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 1/4 tsf Soft........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 1/4 to 1/2 tsf Medium.................... 5 to 8 BPF .................. 1/2 to 1 tsf Stiff........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf Very Stiff................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf Hard.......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf Drilling Notes: BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard penetration test, also known as “N” value. The sampler was set 6 inches into undisturbed soil below the hollow-stem auger. Driving resistances were then counted for second and third 6-inch increments, and added to get BPF. Partial Penetration:If the sampler cannot be driven the full 12 inches beyond the initial 6-inch set, the number of blows for that partial penetration is shown as "No./X" (i.e., 50/2"). If the sampler cannot be advanced beyond the initial 6-inch set, the depth of penetration will be recorded in the Notes column as "No. to set X" (i.e., 50 to set 4"). WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone; driving not required. WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. WL: WL indicates the water level measured by the drillers either while drilling or following drilling. Moisture Content: Dry:Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch. Moist: Damp but no visible water. Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table. 1/2018 Basswood Cir (EB) Kurvers Pt Rd North End Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed Chanhassen, MN GPR Results From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway (Dir) Basswood Cir (EB) - Kurvers Pt Rd to North End 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.) 0 5 10 15 20 25 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.) 0 5 10 15 20 25 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.) Kurvers Pt Rd (Circle) (SB) South End North End Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed Chanhassen, MN GPR Results From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway (Dir) Kurvers Pt Rd (Circle) (SB) - South End to North End 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.) 0 5 10 15 20 25 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.) 0 5 10 15 20 25 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.) Kurvers Pt Rd Cul-de-sac Hwy 101 Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Kurvers Pt Rd - Cul-de-sac to Hwy 101 City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway C-3ST-16 ST-17 0 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Kurvers Pt Rd (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 5 10 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Kurvers Pt Rd (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) ST-190 5 10 15 20 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Kurvers Pt Rd (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 5 10 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Kurvers Pt Rd (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) Twin Maple Rd Kurvers Pt Rd Cul-de-sac Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Twin Maple Rd - Kurvers Pt Rd to Cul-de-sac City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway ST-180 10 20 30 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Twin Maple Rd (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Twin Maple Rd (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Twin Maple Rd (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 5 10 15 20 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Twin Maple Rd (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) Willow View Curve (EB) Cul-de-sac Kurvers Point Rd Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed Chanhassen, MN GPR Results From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway (Dir) Willow View Curve (EB) - Cul-de-sac to Kurvers Point Rd ST-20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft)Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000 Depth (in.)Station (ft) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.) Choctaw Cir Cul-de-sac Hwy 101 Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Choctaw Cir - Cul-de-sac to Hwy 101 City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway ST-130 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Choctaw Cir (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 5 10 15 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Choctaw Cir (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) C-2ST-140 5 10 15 20 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Choctaw Cir (EB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 5 10 15 20 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Choctaw Cir (WB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) Brule Cir Choctaw Cir Cul-de-sac Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Brule Cir - Choctaw Cir to Cul-de-sac City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway ST-150 10 20 30 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Brule Cir (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Brule Cir (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Brule Cir (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Brule Cir (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) Minnewashta Pkwy TH 5 Hwy 7 Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Minnewashta Pkwy - TH 5 to Hwy 7 City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway ST-010 10 20 30 40 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) C-5ST-02 ST-030 10 20 30 40 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) Minnewashta Pkwy TH 5 Hwy 7 Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Minnewashta Pkwy - TH 5 to Hwy 7 City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) ST-04 ST-050 10 20 30 40 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) C-10 10 20 30 40 2,000 2,100 2,200 2,300 2,400 2,500 2,600 2,700 2,800 2,900 3,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) ST-06 ST-07 ST-080 10 20 30 40 3,000 3,100 3,200 3,300 3,400 3,500 3,600 3,700 3,800 3,900 4,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 3,000 3,100 3,200 3,300 3,400 3,500 3,600 3,700 3,800 3,900 4,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) Minnewashta Pkwy TH 5 Hwy 7 Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Minnewashta Pkwy - TH 5 to Hwy 7 City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) ST-090 10 20 30 40 4,000 4,100 4,200 4,300 4,400 4,500 4,600 4,700 4,800 4,900 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 4,000 4,100 4,200 4,300 4,400 4,500 4,600 4,700 4,800 4,900 5,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) C-4ST-100 10 20 30 40 5,000 5,100 5,200 5,300 5,400 5,500 5,600 5,700 5,800 5,900 6,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 5,000 5,100 5,200 5,300 5,400 5,500 5,600 5,700 5,800 5,900 6,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) Minnewashta Pkwy TH 5 Hwy 7 Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Minnewashta Pkwy - TH 5 to Hwy 7 City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) ST-110 10 20 30 40 6,000 6,100 6,200 6,300 6,400 6,500 6,600 6,700 6,800 6,900 7,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 6,000 6,100 6,200 6,300 6,400 6,500 6,600 6,700 6,800 6,900 7,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) ST-120 10 20 30 40 7,000 7,100 7,200 7,300 7,400 7,500 7,600 7,700 7,800 7,900 8,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 7,000 7,100 7,200 7,300 7,400 7,500 7,600 7,700 7,800 7,900 8,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) Minnewashta Pkwy TH 5 Hwy 7 Note: stations are positive in the NB or EB direction; SB or WB scans have been reversed GPR Results: Minnewashta Pkwy - TH 5 to Hwy 7 City of Chanhassen From To B1804714 Location Project No. Roadway Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) 0 10 20 30 40 8,000 8,100 8,200 8,300 8,400 8,500 8,600 8,700 8,800 8,900 9,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 8,000 8,100 8,200 8,300 8,400 8,500 8,600 8,700 8,800 8,900 9,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 9,000 9,100 9,200 9,300 9,400 9,500 9,600 9,700 9,800 9,900 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (NB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) 0 10 20 30 40 9,000 9,100 9,200 9,300 9,400 9,500 9,600 9,700 9,800 9,900 10,000Depth (in.)Station (ft) Minnewashta Pkwy (SB) Bit Depth (in.)Agg Depth (in.)Core Hand Auger Bit (Boring)Agg (Boring) MnPAVE Design Summary MnPAVE 6.304 Simulation Input File: minnewashta.mpv Confidence Level for Preliminary Life Estimate = 70% Confidence and Reliability may not agree. Thickness and modulus are reduced when Confidence > 50%. Monte Carlo Reliability randomly selects values for each layer. Use Reliability for final design. Preliminary Life Estimate 20-Year Reliability (2,500 cycles) Fatigue FatigueRutting Rutting >50 years >50 years 100%100% Project Information District County City Metro Carver Chanhassen Project Number Route Reference Post B1804714 MSAS 111 from -- to -- Letting Date Construction Type 01/01/19 -- Designer Soils Engineer City of Chanhassen Braun Intertec Climate Information Seasons Location 5 44˚ 47’ Latitude, 93˚ 46’ Longitude Structural Information (Design Level: Basic) Layer Type Subtype Height (in.) 1a Hot-Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%)PG58-34 (2360F 1/2")3.00 1b Hot-Mix Asphalt (Pb = 5.0%)PG58-28 (2360F 1/2")2.00 2 Aggregate Base MnDOT Class 5 12.00 3 Aggregate Subbase MnDOT Select Granular 24.00 4 Engineered Soil Clay Loam 12.00 5 Undisturbed Soil Clay Loam Traffic Information (Speed = 30 mph) Load Type First Year ESAL Growth Rate Total Repetitions ESAL 12,980 1.6% (simple)299,000 Notes Minnewashta Parkway TH 5 to the county line The Minnesota Department of Transportation makes no guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, with respect to the reuse of the data provided herewith, regardless of its format or means of its transmission. The user accepts the data "as is", and assumes all risks associated with its use. By accepting this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user shall include with the data a copy of this disclaimer. The Minnesota Department of Transportation assumes no responsibility, actual or consequential, for damage that results from any user’s reliance on this data. Printed Wednesday, August 01, 2018 at 15:44:45 CONSULTANTS • ENVIRONMENTAL • GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • FORENSICS www.amengtest.com REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND PAVEMENT EVALUATION 2020 Pavement Improvements Chanhassen, Minnesota Report No. 28-20267 Date: March 11, 2020 Prepared for: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Page i 550 Cleveland Avenue North | Saint Paul, MN 55114 Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | www.amengtest.com | AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. March 11, 2020 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: Mr. Steve Ferraro, Construction Manager Re: Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements Chanhassen, Minnesota AET Report No. 28-20267 Dear Mr. Ferraro: American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) is pleased to present the results of our subsurface exploration program and pavement evaluation review for the 2020 Pavement Improvements project in Chanhassen, Minnesota. These services were performed in general accordance with our proposal dated December 11, 2019 and authorized on January 14, 2020. A draft report was submitted to the City of Chanhassen dated February 14, 2020 and has been revised to reflect discussions with the City of Chanhassen. We are submitting this report as an electronic pdf copy. Additional copies can be provided upon request. Please contact us if you have any questions about the report. Sincerely, American Engineering Testing, Inc. Krystle R. Staker Project Manager, Engineering Technician III Phone: (586) 850-9717 kstaker@amengtest.com CONSULTANTS • ENVIRONMENTAL • GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • FORENSICS Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation Review 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Copyright 2020 American Engineering Testing, Inc. All Rights Reserved Unauthorized use or copying of this document is strictly prohibited by anyone other than the client for the specific project. Page ii SIGNATURE PAGE Prepared for: Prepared by: City of Chanhassen American Engineering Testing, Inc. 7700 Market Boulevard 550 Cleveland Avenue North P.O. Box 147 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (651) 659-9001/www.amengtest.com Attn: Mr. Steve Ferraro, Construction Manager Authored by: Reviewed by: Krystle R. Staker Jacob O. Michalowski, PE Project Manager, Engineering Technician III Senior Engineer I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under Minnesota Statute Section 326.02 to 326.15 Name: Jacob O. Michalowski Date: March 11, 2020 License #: 54188 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation Review 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Transmittal Letter............................................................................................................................. i Signature Page ................................................................................................................................ ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................................................ 1 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ..................................................................................................... 1 4.0 PAVEMENT & SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION TESTING PROGRAM .......................... 3 4.1 Pavement Thickness Testing (GPR) ...................................................................................... 3 4.2 Subsurface Field Exploration ................................................................................................ 4 4.3 Laboratory Testing ................................................................................................................ 4 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 4 5.1 Surface Observations ............................................................................................................. 4 5.2 Pavement Thickness .............................................................................................................. 9 5.3 Subsurface Soils/Geology.................................................................................................... 11 5.4 Ground Water ...................................................................................................................... 12 5.5 Review of Soil Properties .................................................................................................... 12 6.0 PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT METHODS ........................................................................ 13 6.1 Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 13 6.2 Pavement Section Thickness Requirements ........................................................................ 14 6.3 Full Depth Reclamation ....................................................................................................... 15 6.4 Resurfacing .......................................................................................................................... 16 6.5 Mill-and-Overlay ................................................................................................................. 16 6.6 Aggregate Base .................................................................................................................... 17 6.7 Bituminous Mixes................................................................................................................ 17 6.8 Texas Underseal .................................................................................................................. 18 6.9 Pavement Maintenance ........................................................................................................ 18 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................. 18 7.1 Potential Difficulties ............................................................................................................ 18 7.2 Observation and Testing ...................................................................................................... 19 8.0 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 19 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation Review 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED STANDARD SHEETS Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction Bituminous Overlay Milling and Preparation FIGURES Figures 1 through 5 – Bituminous Thickness by GPR, Core and Soil Boring Locations APPENDIX A Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing GPR Data Analysis Results APPENDIX B Pavement Core Log Photos Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thicknesses APPENDIX C Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes MnDOT Boring Log Descriptive Terminology AASHTO Soil Classification System Subsurface Boring Logs Materials Test Reports Table Summary of Results and Recommendations APPENDIX D Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 1 of 19 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pavement improvements are proposed for various neighborhood areas throughout Chanhassen, Minnesota. These neighborhood areas include Lake Lucy Road, Redwing Lane, Trappers Pass, and Marsh Drive. To assist in planning and design, the City of Chanhassen (City) has authorized American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) to conduct a subsurface exploration and pavement evaluation review to include bituminous pavement coring, soil borings, ground penetrating radar (GPR), and perform a geotechnical and pavement engineering review for the project. This report presents the results of these services and provides our engineering recommendations based on this data. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES AET's services were performed in accordance with our proposal to the City dated December 11, 2019 and authorized by the City on January 14, 2020. The authorized scope of services consisted of the following: • Perform ground penetrating radar (GPR) in both directions of travel on approximately 10 lane miles of roadways at a rate of 4 scans/foot. • Perform 130, four-inch diameter pavement cores and 48 flight auger soil borings to a depth of 10 feet. • Conduct soil laboratory testing to include sieve analyses and moisture content testing. • Perform a geotechnical engineering review based on the data obtained and preparation of this report. The services reported herein are intended for geotechnical purposes only. The scope is not intended to explore for the presence or extent of environmental contamination in the soil or groundwater; however, obvious contamination detected by us will be reported to you. 3.0 PROJECT INFORMATION This project includes 32 roadway segments in various neighborhoods that are planned for rehabilitation as part of the 2020 pavement improvement program. Each of the roadways are generally residential streets that are currently posted at a 5-ton spring load limit. The City is considering multiple rehabilitation approaches to include full depth reclamation, stabilized full depth reclamation, mill-and-overlay, use of Texas underseal and/or full reconstruction for the roadways. We understand that if the rehabilitation is beyond a mill-and-overlay, the intent would be to meet a 7-ton pavement design. It is anticipated that the roadways will keep their existing grade and width. The roadway segments included in the project scope are indicated in Table 1: Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 2 of 19 Table 1.0 – Roadway Project Segments. Segment ID Area Road Start End 1 Lake Lucy Road Lake Lucy Rd Powers Blvd Nez Perce Dr 2 Nez Perce Dr Lake Lucy Rd End 3 Vineland Ct Nez Perce Dr Cul-de-sac 4 Troendle Cir Nez Perce Dr Cul-de-sac 5 Redwing Lane Redwing Lane Carver Beach Rd Kerber Blvd 6 Penamint Ln Carver Beach Rd Redwing Lane 7 Penamint Ct Penamint Ln Cul-de-sac 8 Trappers Pass (East & West) Near Mountain Blvd Pleasantview Rd ~500' N of Trappers Pass 9 Castle Ridge Near Mountain Blvd Vine Hill Rd 10 Cascade Pass Castle Ridge S Castle Ridge N 11 Cascade Ct Cascade Pass Cul-de-sac 12 Cascade Cir Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 13 Shasta Cir E Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 14 Shasta Cir W Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 15 Olympic Cir Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 16 Castle Ridge Ct Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 17 Mountain Way Near Mountain Blvd Oxbow Bend 18 Mountain View Ct Near Mountain Blvd Cul-de-sac 19 Oxbow Bend Trappers Pass Oxbow Bend 20 Rojina Ln Oxbow Bend Cul-de-sac 21 Summit Cir Oxbow Bend Cul-de-sac 22 Trappers Pass Oxbow Bend (S) Near Mountain Blvd 23 Piedmont Ct Near Mountain Blvd Cul-de-sac 24 Stag Horn Ln Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 25 Trap Line Cir Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 26 Trap Line Ln Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 27 Marsh Drive Hidden Ct Lake Dr E Cul-de-sac 28 Hidden Ln Marsh Dr Hidden Ct 29 Hidden Cir Hidden Ln Cul-de-sac 30 Marsh Drive Lake Dr E Dakota Ln 31 Sinnen Cir Marsh Dr Cul-de-sac 32 Dakota Ln Erie Cir Cul-de-sac As-builts were provided to us for a majority of the roadway segments and the pavement section generally consisted of 3 ½ inches of asphalt over 12 inches of crushed gravel base. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 3 of 19 Current AADT volumes for the roadways included in the project scope were not available. Low traffic volumes of less than 400 and between 400 and 1,000 ADT were assumed for pavement design, as these roadways generally service residential homes in neighborhoods. The above stated information represents our understanding of the proposed construction. This information is an integral part of our engineering review. It is important that you contact us if there are changes from that described so that we can evaluate whether modifications to our recommendations are appropriate. 4.0 PAVEMENT & SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION TESTING PROGRAM 4.1 Pavement Thickness Testing (GPR) The pavement section thickness testing program conducted for this project consisted of a high speed (air coupled) GPR antenna that collected material layer thickness data at a rate of four scans per foot. The data was collected using a 2 GHz antenna, which generally allows material layer measurements at depths of 18 to 20 inches with a resolution of less than about ½ inch. The GPR data collection is tied to GPS coordinates. The test data and details of the methods used appear in Appendix A. The GPR data was collected on January 28, 2020 according to SIR-30 processor settings established by GSSI RoadScan system. A calibration file, required for data post-processing, was collected prior to testing. Figures 1 through 5 shows the GPR scanning routes. The GPR interface identification was accomplished using RADAN 7.0, a proprietary software package included with the GSSI RoadScan system. The software includes tools to aid in delineating pavement layer transitions, and automatically calculates their depths from the pavement surface using the calibration file(s) collected prior to testing. The identified layer(s) were also compared to the pavement core and soil boring data (when available) to validate the accuracy of the layer thicknesses. The total depth of pavement is not always explicitly clear. Where gaps in clear identification of the pavement and base layer thicknesses are encountered, they are reported as a percent of the picking rate of the layer interface. A picking rate of 100 percent indicates the layer interfaces were visible in 100 percent of the scanned points. Factors influencing definition of radar scans include ambient electromagnetic interference, the presence of moisture, the presence of voids, and the similarity of material layer type between layers (e.g. gravel vs. gravelly sand). Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 4 of 19 4.2 Subsurface Field Exploration The subsurface exploration program conducted for the project consisted of 130, four-inch diameter pavement cores and 48 flight auger borings to a depth of 10-feet. The pavement cores were performed January 20, 2020 through January 23, 2020, and the soil borings were performed January 30, 2020 through February 6, 2020. The pavement cores and soil borings were performed within the drive lanes (inside and outside wheel paths) of the roadway. The number of borings and cores, approximate test locations, and soil boring depths were selected by the City. The locations were located in the field by AET personnel and the final locations were recorded with a hand-held GPS unit. Hand augers were not performed at the core locations due to frozen base conditions; therefore, physical aggregate base measurements were not obtained on roadway segments with only core locations. Adjacent roadway soil borings and as-built data were used to interpret possible aggregate base layers on these roadway segments within the GPR data. The approximate locations of the pavement cores and soil borings are illustrated in Figures 1 through 5. Reports containing the photographs and measurements of the pavement cores appear in Appendix B and the subsurface boring logs and details of the methods used appear in Appendix C. The logs contain information concerning soil layering, soil classification, and geologic description. 4.3 Laboratory Testing The laboratory test program included visual/manual classification of the soil samples according to the MnDOT Textural Classification System and the AASHTO soil designation symbol in parenthesis, moisture content, and sieve analysis testing. The moisture content and material finer than the #200 sieve are reported on the boring logs in Appendix C, adjacent to the samples they were performed on. The complete sieve analysis results are also attached in Appendix C following the subsurface boring logs. 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS 5.1 Surface Observations During the GPR survey, a digital video log (DVL) of each roadway was collected to review the roadway surface conditions and note major pavement distresses. 5.1.1 Lake Lucy Road Area The major pavement distresses identified along the roadways included within the Lake Lucy Road area consisted of high severity longitudinal cracking, medium to high severity transverse cracking, fatigue cracking, delamination of chip seal, deterioration of pavement in areas with fatigue cracking, and weathering. Areas around manhole covers exhibited cracking. Skin patches were Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 5 of 19 also observed on Troendle Circle. Several maintenance repairs have been made within this area that include patching and the application of chip seal and fog seal. Figure 5.1.1-1 Typical Distresses (Lake Lucy Rd. near Powers Blvd. Intersection). Figure 5.1.1-2 Typical Distresses (Nez Perce Dr. near Lake Lucy Rd. Intersection). 5.1.2 Redwing Lane Area The major pavement distresses identified along the roadways included within the Redwing Lane area consisted of low to high severity longitudinal and transverse cracking, fatigue and block cracking, delamination of chip seal, and weathering. Areas around manhole covers exhibited Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 6 of 19 cracking. Skin patches were also observed on Redwing Lane. Several maintenance repairs have been made within this area and include patching and the application of chip seal and fog seal. Figure 5.1.2-1 Typical Distresses (Penamint Ln. near Redwing Ln. Intersection). Figure 5.1.2-2 Typical Distresses (Redwing Ln. near Penamint Ln. Intersection). 5.1.3 Trappers Pass Area The major pavement distresses identified along the roadways included within the Trappers Pass area consisted of various degrees of severity longitudinal and transverse cracking (generally high severity), fatigue and block cracking, delamination of chip seal, skin patches, deterioration of Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 7 of 19 pavement in areas with fatigue cracking, and weathering. Areas around manhole covers exhibited cracking. Several maintenance repairs have been made within this area that include patching and the application of chip seal and fog seal. Figure 5.1.3-1 Typical Distresses (Trappers Pass at Stag Horn Ln. Intersection). Figure 5.1.3-2 Typical Distresses (Near Mountain Blvd. at Mountain Way Intersection). Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 8 of 19 Figure 5.1.3-3 Typical Distresses (Castle Ridge near Shasta Cir. W. Intersection). Figure 5.1.3-4 Typical Distresses (Mountain Way at Oxbow Bend Intersection). 5.1.4 Marsh Drive Area The major pavement distresses identified along the roadways included within the Marsh Drive area consisted of low to high severity longitudinal cracking (generally high), high severity transverse cracking, fatigue cracking, delamination of chip seal, skin patches, and weathering. Areas around manhole covers exhibited cracking. Several maintenance repairs have been made within this area and include patching, use of crack sealant, and the application of chip seal and fog seal. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 9 of 19 Figure 5.1.4-1 Typical Distresses (Marsh Dr. near Dakota Ln. Intersection). Figure 5.1.4-2 Typical Distresses (Dakota Ln. near Erie Cir. Intersection). 5.2 Pavement Thickness 5.2.1 GPR Results The GPR data generally show a clear interface between the bituminous and possible aggregate base, and generally show a clear interface between the possible aggregate base layer. A discernable aggregate base layer was not identified for Hidden Circle. The data plots identifying layer thicknesses, included in Appendix A, are data points collected at 3-inch spacing and averaged over 10 feet intervals. Gaps within the plotted GPR data are a result of interference due to snow and/or Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 10 of 19 ice coverage of the roadway or are a result of the identified layer exceeding the available viewing window of the GPR scan. Table 2.0 below shows the statistical results of the bituminous surface (“Surface”) and possible aggregate base layer (“Base”) thickness measurements by GPR along each roadway section. The 15th percentile represents the value at which 85% of the section has a pavement layer thickness that is greater than identified. This is the value we generally recommend using for pavement design purposes. Table 2.0 GPR Thickness Results (inches) Segment ID Roadway Termini Surface (inches) Base (inches) Begin End Avg CV 15th Avg CV 15th 1 Lake Lucy Rd Powers Blvd Nez Perce Dr 3.9 13% 3.3 11.4 9% 10.4 2 Nez Perce Dr Lake Lucy Rd End 4.9 20% 4.0 12.0 19% 9.3 3 Vineland Ct Nez Perce Dr Cul-de-sac 5.1 18% 4.2 11.0 12% 9.5 4 Troendle Cir Nez Perce Dr Cul-de-sac 4.3 11% 3.8 10.2 9% 9.4 5 Redwing Lane Carver Beach Rd Kerber Blvd 4.5 12% 4.0 10.7 17% 8.9 6 Penamint Ln Carver Beach Rd Redwing Lane 4.6 8% 4.3 7.9 24% 5.8 7 Penamint Ct Penamint Ln Cul-de-sac 4.5 8% 4.2 12.3 8% 11.3 8 Near Mountain Blvd Pleasantview Rd ~500' N of Trappers Pass 4.8 21% 3.8 10.6 18% 8.3 9 Castle Ridge Near Mountain Blvd Vine Hill Rd 4.2 12% 3.7 10.2 11% 9.1 10 Cascade Pass Castle Ridge S Castle Ridge N 4.3 12% 3.8 9.1 14% 7.9 11 Cascade Ct Cascade Pass Cul-de-sac 4.7 11% 4.2 10.1 11% 8.9 12 Cascade Cir Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 4.7 14% 3.9 13.2 6% 12.4 13 Shasta Cir E Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 4.3 15% 3.7 9.4 19% 7.9 14 Shasta Cir W Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 4.8 19% 3.9 9.7 16% 8.1 15 Olympic Cir Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 4.8 18% 3.9 5.3 23% 3.9 16 Castle Ridge Ct Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 5.2 20% 4.2 9.2 16% 8.0 17 Mountain Way Near Mountain Blvd Oxbow Bend 4.3 12% 3.8 9.8 21% 7.7 18 Mountain View Ct Near Mountain Blvd Cul-de-sac 4.9 15% 4.2 8.6 11% 7.5 19 Oxbow Bend Trappers Pass Oxbow Bend 4.0 20% 3.2 9.7 14% 8.3 20 Rojina Ln Oxbow Bend Cul-de-sac *GPR Data not collected due to snow coverage 21 Summit Cir Oxbow Bend Cul-de-sac 4.7 18% 3.9 11.0 11% 9.7 22 Trappers Pass Oxbow Bend (S) Near Mountain Blvd 4.9 21% 3.8 9.9 17% 7.8 23 Piedmont Ct Near Mountain Blvd Cul-de-sac 5.0 10% 4.6 9.0 13% 7.8 24 Stag Horn Ln Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 4.6 17% 3.6 8.3 24% 6.1 25 Trap Line Cir Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 4.5 16% 3.7 9.1 16% 7.6 26 Trap Line Ln Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 5.0 15% 4.3 9.2 15% 7.9 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 11 of 19 Segment ID Roadway Termini Surface (inches) Base (inches) Begin End Avg CV 15th Avg CV 15th 27 Hidden Ct Lake Dr E Cul-de-sac 4.4 13% 3.8 10.7 12% 9.6 28 Hidden Ln Marsh Dr Hidden Ct 4.3 13% 3.7 10.2 11% 9.1 29 Hidden Cir Hidden Ln Cul-de-sac 4.7 20% 3.7 * * * 30 Marsh Drive Lake Dr E Dakota Ln 4.1 14% 3.5 10.7 13% 9.4 31 Sinnen Cir Marsh Dr Cul-de-sac 4.6 13% 4.0 10.8 16% 8.7 32 Dakota Ln Erie Cir Cul-de-sac 4.2 15% 3.5 10.7 31% 9.6 Note: Avg – Average; CV – Coefficient of Variation; 15th – 15th Percentile. *A discernable base layer was not identified in the GPR data. 5.2.2 Pavement Core and Soil Boring Results AET performed 130, four-inch diameter pavement cores (B-1 to B-48, C-1 to C-82) and 48 flight auger soil borings (B-1 to B-48). Bituminous pavement was encountered at each of the pavement core and soil boring locations. Crushed limestone base was encountered directly beneath the bituminous pavement at each soil boring location, except at soil boring locations B-7, B-8, B-10, and B-41, where a mixture of crushed limestone base and silty sand was encountered directly beneath the bituminous pavement. Sieve analysis tests were performed on select jar samples of the recovered base material and each classified as AASHTO designation A-1-a or A-1-b, which is typical of an aggregate base. However, the minus #200 content was higher than the typical MnDOT Aggregate Base material gradation specification, except for the base material encountered at boring location B-8, which meets MnDOT Class 5 specifications. Therefore, we refer to the base throughout this report as ‘possible aggregate base’ or simply ‘base’. Refer to the boring logs and sieve analysis test reports included in Appendix C for more detailed information regarding the base. A table of the encountered bituminous pavement thickness at each pavement core location and the base thickness at each soil boring location are included in Appendix B. At core locations within the Redwing Lane Area and segments deemed suitable for a mill-and-overlay, the visible lift thicknesses of the cores were measured and are shown on the pavement core log photos. 5.3 Subsurface Soils/Geology The subsurface soils and geology encountered at the soil boring locations are generally described in the following sections. Refer to the subsurface boring logs attached in Appendix C for specific information. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 12 of 19 5.3.1 Lake Lucy Road Area The underlying soils below the possible aggregate base consisted of predominantly fill, till, and alluvium soils at each boring location. The soils encountered were classified as silty clay loam, loam, plastic sandy loam, and slightly plastic sandy loam (A-6). 5.3.2 Redwing Lane Area The underlying soils below the possible aggregate base consisted of predominantly fill and till soils at each boring location. The soils encountered were classified as loam (A-6). 5.3.3 Trappers Pass Area The underlying soils below the possible aggregate base consisted of predominantly fill and till soils at each boring location. The soils generally encountered at each boring location were classified as loam, plastic sandy loam, and slightly plastic sandy loam (A-6). Borings B-18 and B- 36 encountered loamy sand and slightly plastic sandy loam (A-2-4), respectively. Boring B-39 encountered a mixture of loamy sand and plastic sandy loam (A-2-6), gravelly loamy sand (A-1- b), and plastic sandy loam (A-6). 5.3.4 Marsh Drive Area The underlying soils below the possible aggregate base consisted of predominantly fill and till soils at each boring location. The soils encountered were classified as silty clay loam, loam, and plastic sandy loam (A-6). 5.4 Ground Water Groundwater was not observed in any of the boring locations within the sampled depth, however the lack of a water level does not indicate that groundwater does not exist within this depth. In general, the fine grained soils at this site are slow draining and it may take an extended period of time for groundwater levels to stabilize within these soils. Piezometer installation, to more accurately determine groundwater levels, was not within our scope of services. Groundwater levels will fluctuate due to varying seasonal and annual rainfall and snow melt amounts and other factors. 5.5 Review of Soil Properties 5.5.1 Strength/Stability High strength/stability is needed from the upper portion of the subgrade to resist yielding from wheel loads. Although load intensity dissipates with depth, the more critical portion requiring high strength for wheel load resistance is normally considered the upper three feet of the subgrade (defined as the critical subgrade zone in this report). Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 13 of 19 The subgrade soils encountered within the critical subgrade zone were silty/clayey/loamy (A-6) soils, which can become unstable with construction traffic when wet. These soils are judged to have moderately low strength and stability. 5.5.2 Drainage and Frost Susceptibility Subgrade soils encountered within the upper 3 feet from the roadway surface were generally silty/clayey/loamy (A-6) soils, with the exception of borings B-18 and B-36. The loam, silty clay loam, slightly plastic and plastic sandy loam (A-6) soils have poor drainage characteristics and are highly frost susceptible. This results in increased periods of upper subgrade saturation, which leads to increased detrimental frost effects (heaving and thaw weakening). The loamy sand (A-2-4) soils, encountered at borings B-18 and B-36, possess fair drainage characteristics, and low to moderate frost susceptibility. 6.0 PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT METHODS 6.1 Discussion We understand the City is considering different pavement rehabilitation approaches for each roadway segment, which include full depth reclamation (FDR), stabilized full depth reclamation (SFDR), mill-and-overlay, resurfacing, and full reconstruction. The use of a Texas Underseal is also under consideration to use in conjunction with a mill-and-overlay. The City provided the current estimated Overall Condition Index (OCI) ratings based on their pavement management system projections for the roadway. The condition range indicated by the OCI ratings are presented in Table 3.0 below for each project area. The general condition of the pavement cores varied from minimal to severe stripping. The age of the pavement is approaching 26 to 40 years. Table 3.0 – OCI Ratings. Area OCI Rating Lake Lucy Road Failed to Poor Redwing Lane Poor to Fair Trappers Pass Failed to Poor Marsh Drive Poor Based upon our review of the pavement condition and thickness, pavement cores, and soil borings, it is in our opinion that the rehabilitation approaches most suitable for these roadways include full depth reclamation or resurfacing. A full depth reclamation approach is preferred over resurfacing due to the variable and higher minus #200 contents of the base material encountered. A full reconstruction approach could be considered for all of the roadways as well, if significant utility work is needed. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 14 of 19 We have summarized the data collected and the proposed rehabilitation approach for each roadway segment into a table included in Appendix C, titled Table of Results and Recommendations. Rehabilitation of roadways is generally more cost effective than full reconstruction if significant utility repairs are not required, however the long-term pavement performance is not as great as would be realized if a full reconstruction were performed. It is important to consider overall cost, as well as the extension of life for the pavement when selecting a rehabilitation method. A full depth reclamation approach will typically have a higher initial cost than a mill-and-overlay or resurfacing approach, however the FDR approach provides an increased service life of the pavement, up to 20 years or more with maintenance. An FDR pavement section breaks up all of the cracking within the pavement layers so the new section will not experience reflective cracking like a mill-and-overlay approach will, the aggregate base layer is improved, and the extended life of the pavement is relatively greater. Resurfacing allows a new bituminous layer to be placed with minimal improvements to the base aggregate. In terms of extending pavement service life and cost, this approach is between an FDR approach and a mill-and-overlay approach. However, with a resurfacing approach, there is a risk of encountering soft areas during construction that may result in extra costs to repair that were not planned for. A mill-and-overlay is generally the least expensive rehabilitation approach presented in this report, however the life expectancy of the pavement is also the shortest. Mill-and-overlays are dependent on the remaining bituminous condition and existing subsurface, which vary the life expectancy and pose greater potential risks if the existing bituminous condition and existing subsurface conditions are poor. For definitions related to pavement construction and referenced in the following sections, please see the attached standard sheet entitled “Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction.” This report also references the 2018 MnDOT Standard Specifications for Construction (MnDOT Spec.). We have also included the standard sheets entitled “Bituminous Pavement Subgrade Preparation and Design” and “Bituminous Overlay Milling and Preparation.” 6.2 Pavement Section Thickness Requirements Current AADT volumes for the roadways included in the project scope were not available. Low traffic volumes of 400 to 1,000 ADT were assumed for pavement design, as these roadways generally service residential traffic. We also understand that these roadways currently have a 5- ton spring load limit. To evaluate pavement designs for each roadway, MnDOT’s “Flexible Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 15 of 19 Pavement Design Using Soil Factors” chart for a 7-ton design with a traffic volume of less than 400 and 400 to 1,000 ADT was utilized. The limiting subgrade soils encountered throughout each neighborhood area were A-6 soils and a soil factor of 100 was used to determine the minimum required gravel equivalency (GE). The minimum bituminous GE is 7 inches and the total required GE is 11.5 inches for traffic volumes less than 400 ADT. The minimum bituminous GE is 7 inches and the total required GE is 15 inches for traffic volumes between 400 and 1,000 ADT. We understand the City plans to pave back 4 inches of bituminous pavement in accordance with the City’s current standard section and this has been incorporated into the full depth reclamation pavement sections. The total GE calculated for roadway segments suitable for a full depth reclamation approach are included in the Table of Results and Recommendations in Appendix C. The total GE presented in this table does not include any remaining base after the reclamation process is complete due to the base material generally not meeting MnDOT specifications for Class 5 material. The total GE for roadway segments suitable for a mill-and-overlay are not calculated due to variations in the bituminous conditions and thicknesses; rather a range of extended life is presented in Section 6.5 of this report. 6.3 Full Depth Reclamation Full depth reclamation (FDR) involves pre-grinding the existing bituminous pavement and underlying base material with the intent to create a recycled aggregate base. A portion of this material is then removed to control grade before placement of new bituminous surfacing. This approach will remove the existing pavement distresses. FDR can be either non-stabilized or stabilized. In stabilized reclamation, a stabilizing additive, such as emulsified asphalt or cement is added to the reclaimed material, which stabilizes and strengthens the reclaimed aggregate base, which typically allows for thinner bituminous surfacing. These processes require that appropriate material types and thicknesses be in-place. Due to the anticipated low traffic volumes and spring load limit, it is in our opinion an FDR approach would be suitable for each of the roadway segments included in the project scope. The minimum required GE can be met or exceeded with an FDR approach, therefore a stabilized FDR is not needed for this project. We recommend the FDR be conducted in accordance with the applicable subsections of MnDOT Spec. 2215 Reclamation. We recommend the reclaimed FDR material placed on the roadway as aggregate base meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3135 Modified Aggregate Bases. The “Table of Results and Recommendations” in Appendix C presents the recommended reclaim depth for each roadway segment. The reclaim depth presented is the maximum depth suitable; Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 16 of 19 however, the reclaim depth may need to be adjusted based on existing site conditions to reduce the risk of fully penetrating the base layer into the fine-grained subgrade soils. The GPR data should be reviewed prior to construction to ensure that underlying subgrade soils are not incorporated into the FDR material. This will require a thinner reclaim in some areas, however the total reclaim depth should be kept as close to the maximum reclaim depth as possible. This should be monitored during construction. Significantly reducing the reclaim depth for the entire roadway segment will negatively impact the total GE. The FDR approach will generally provide 18+ years of life to the pavement, provided proper maintenance is performed over that time span. 6.4 Resurfacing Resurfacing removes the existing bituminous pavement and leaves the existing aggregate base in place. After the bituminous pavement has been removed by milling, only surficial improvement to the base layer is possible. This option is appropriate to relatively thin bituminous pavements or to bituminous pavements in poor condition with sufficient aggregate base in good condition, such as is generally present at these sites; however, the gradation of the base material indicates that minus #200 content is high relative to typical aggregate bases. Resurfacing also requires an adequate and consistent thickness of the existing aggregate base layer, as well as a strong subgrade, such that the aggregate base layer can be improved by conditioning and recompacting. It may be necessary to add additional aggregate base on some roadway segments to maintain the existing grade of the roadway after the pavement has been milled. We recommend that the placement of additional aggregate base, conditioning, and recompacting of the aggregate base layer pass a test roll procedure before the placement of new bituminous pavement. A resurfacing approach may provide 12 to 18 years of life to the pavement structure, as the aggregate base is not being corrected or improved. 6.5 Mill-and-Overlay A mill-and-overlay removes the upper portion of the existing bituminous, but leaves the lower portion in place; hence, improvements to the base and subgrade layers are not possible. This approach requires a sufficient bituminous layer such that enough bituminous remains to prevent the paving equipment from breaking through into the base layer. This remaining bituminous thickness is typically considered to be at least 1½ inches; however, the required thickness also depends on the bituminous condition, as stripped or severely deteriorated bituminous pavement is not suitable. With the mill-and-overlay approach, cracks from the existing pavement will reappear in the new surface layer after a short time (reflective cracking). Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 17 of 19 This approach would only be beneficial for select roadway segments included in the project scope – Penamint Court, Cascade Court, Mountain View Court, Stag Horn Lane, and Sinnen Circle. These roadway segments have sufficient bituminous thickness and the pavement cores exhibited minimal to moderate stripping. The remaining roadway segments have either insufficient bituminous thickness, exhibited severe stripping throughout one or more of the pavement cores obtained from that segment, exhibited moderate to severe stripping in the lower lift(s) of the pavement core, or combination of all. If a mill-and-overlay approach were utilized on these roadways, there is a risk that significant preparation work after milling could be required or should be planned for in design. With this approach, the recommended mill-and-overlay depths are included in the “Table of Results and Recommendations” in Appendix C. We recommend using bituminous mix SPWEA340B. The extended life of the pavement will vary based upon the existing condition and on the amount of pre-overlay crack repair and post-overlay maintenance, which may be in the range of 6 to 12 years. The milled surface should be prepared according to MnDOT Spec. 2231 Bituminous Surface Reconditioning prior to the overlay. 6.6 Aggregate Base If new aggregate base is needed for pavement support, it should meet the gradation and quality requirements for Class 5, 5Q, or 6 per MnDOT Spec. 3138. Reclaimed material and any bituminous millings placed on the roadway as aggregate base should meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3135 Modified Aggregate Bases. Aggregate base placement and compaction should be performed according to MnDOT Spec. 2211. All aggregate base material (including existing, imported, or reclaimed) should be tested for compaction using the Penetration Index Method per MnDOT Spec. 2211.3.D.2.c. 6.7 Bituminous Mixes The bituminous mixtures should meet the most current MnDOT Spec. 2360 (Plant-Mixed Asphalt Pavement) requirements. Compaction of all bituminous mixtures should be by the “Maximum Density Method.” We understand that the Standard City Detail Plate No. 5200 specifies the use of bituminous mix SPWEA340C for the upper lift and SPNWB330C for the lower lift of pavement. These bituminous mixes are suitable for use in the FDR and resurfacing pavement sections. Use of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) in the bituminous mix is a cost saving measure that is often suggested. If used, we recommend a maximum of 20% RAP with the mixes presented Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 18 of 19 previously; however, there will be a higher probability of pavement thermal cracking when RAP is used. In addition, we recommend limiting RAP within the upper wear course to a maximum of 10% in order to reduce cracking. If bituminous mixes are utilized other than those recommended, a lower percentage of RAP may be needed. The bituminous pavement mixtures and placement should follow the City’s standard specification which references the MnDOT Spec. 2360. An “A” or “B” gradation could be interchanged for each lift. An “A” gradation generally provides a “finer” pavement surface. 6.8 Texas Underseal A Texas underseal may be beneficial for the City to use in conjunction with a mill-and-overlay. Texas underseals do not contribute to the required GE, however they have been shown to extend the life of the pavement. Texas underseals are applied to milled pavement prior to the bituminous overlay and act as an impervious membrane to help prevent the presence of excess moisture, which may help delay or reduce reflective cracking in mill-and-overlays. Generally, reflective cracking is observed on roadways with a mill-and-overlay 1-3 years after construction and roadways with a mill-and-overlay and Texas underseal exhibit reflective cracking 3-6 years after construction. If used, the underseal should meet MnDOT specification 2356 and be applied to the milled surface immediately prior to the overlay. 6.9 Pavement Maintenance Regardless of the improvement approach selected, all bituminous pavements require on-going maintenance to reach their design life. Even if placed and compacted properly over stable subgrade conditions, bituminous pavements typically experience cracking in 1 to 3 years, primarily due to temperature-related expansion and shrinkage. We recommend that a regularly scheduled maintenance program consisting of patching and sealing of cracks and local distressed areas be implemented. Seal coating of the pavement surface after 3 to 5 years also helps prolong the pavement life. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Potential Difficulties 7.1.1 Water in Excavation Groundwater was not measured in any of our borings during the time of drilling; however, water may collect in the excavation bottoms during times of inclement weather or snow melt. To allow observation of the excavation bottom, and to reduce the potential for soil disturbance we recommend that all free-standing water within the excavations be removed prior to fill placement. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 19 of 19 7.1.2 Wet or Dry Soils The on-site materials may be wetter or drier of the “optimum” condition, making proper compaction of those materials difficult unless they are mechanically moisture conditioned to near the standard optimum water content. 7.1.3 Disturbance of Soils The on-site soils can become disturbed under construction traffic, especially if the soils are wet. If soils become disturbed, they should be subcut to the underlying undisturbed soils. The subcut soils can then be dried and recompacted back into place, or they should be removed and replaced with drier imported fill. 7.1.4 Cobbles and Boulders The soils at this site can include cobbles and boulders. This may make excavating procedures somewhat more difficult than normal if they are encountered. 7.2 Observation and Testing The recommendations in this report are based on the subsurface conditions found at our test boring locations. Since subsurface conditions have the potential to vary greatly from our borings, we highly recommend an AET geotechnical engineer/technician provide observations to evaluate these potential changes. Materials testing should also be performed to document that project specifications have been satisfied. 8.0 LIMITATIONS Within the limitations of scope, budget, and schedule, we have endeavored to provide our services according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty, either express or implied, is intended. Important information regarding risk management and proper use of this report is given in Appendix D entitled “Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use”. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Standard Sheets Definitions Relating to Pavement Construction Bituminous Overlay Milling and Preparation 01REP019 (12/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. DEFINITIONS RELATING TO PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION TOP OF SUBGRADE Grade which contacts the bottom of the aggregate base layer. SAND SUBBASE Uniform thickness sand layer placed as the top of subgrade which is intended to improve the frost and drainage characteristics of the pavement system by better draining excess water in the base/subbase, by reducing and “bridging” frost heaving and by reducing spring thaw weakening effects. CRITICAL SUBGRADE ZONE The subgrade portion beneath and within three vertical feet of the top of subgrade. A sand subbase, if placed, would be considered the upper portion of the critical subgrade zone. GRANULAR BORROW Soils meeting Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2B1. This refers to granular soils which, of the portion passing the 1" sieve, contain less than 20% by weight passing the #200 sieve. SELECT GRANULAR BORROW Soils meeting Mn/DOT Specification 3149.2B2. This refers to granular soils which, of the portion passing the 1" sieve, contain less than 12% by weight passing the #200 sieve. MODIFIED SELECT GRANULAR BORROW Clean, medium grained sands which, of the portion passing the 1" sieve, contain less than 5% by weight passing the #200 sieve and less than 40% by weight passing the #40 sieve. GEOTEXTILE STABILIZATION FABRIC Geotextile meeting Type V requirements defined in Mn/DOT Specification 3733. When using fabric, installation should also meet the requirements outlined in Mn/DOT Specification 3733. COMPACTION SUBCUT Construction of a uniform thickness subcut below a designated grade to provide uniformity and compaction within the subcut zone. Replacement fill can be the materials subcut, although the reused soils should be blended to a uniform soil condition and recompacted per the Specified Density Method (Mn/DOT Specification 2105.3F1). TEST ROLL A means of evaluating the near-surface stability of subgrade soils (usually non-granular). Suitability is determined by the depth of rutting or deflection caused by passage of heavy rubber-tired construction equipment, such as a loaded dump truck, over the test area. Yielding of less than 1" is normally considered acceptable, although engineering judgment may be applied depending on equipment used, soil conditions present, and/or pavement performance expectations. UNSTABLE SOILS Subgrade soils which do not pass a test roll. Unstable soils typically have water content exceeding the “standard optimum water content” defined in ASTM: D698 (Standard Proctor test). ORGANIC SOILS Soils which have sufficient organic content such that engineering properties/stability are affected. These soils are usually black to dark brown in color. Page 1 of 2 01REP020 (07/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BITUMINOUS OVERLAY MILLING AND PREPARATION COLD MILLING OPERATION Cold milling is generally conducted longitudinally along the pavement profile. The forward speed of the machine, rotational velocity of the rotating drum, spacing of the carbide bits, and grade control of the cutting head should be closely controlled to produce a uniform texture throughout the project. The longitudinal profile should be held as close as practical to the same tolerance as new construction, since the milled profile will have a significant impact upon the ride of the overlaid pavement, especially when only a single lift of overlay is placed. Normally, the recommended milling depth corresponds to the lift thickness of the original pavement. It is best to remove the entire layer as the bottom of the lift is typically where bonding and stripping issues occur. The depth of milling may require adjustment in the field to ensure that a full layer is removed and that portions of a layer are not left bonded to the underlying surface. Additionally, if there is a large amount of stripping present, the milling depth should be sufficiently deep to remove the stripped areas. This depth is typically determined by coring adjacent to cracks and looking at both the layer thickness and any evidence of stripping. The milling depth can be adjusted to remove areas with significant stripping present, or if the stripping is limited only to a few transverse cracks, a smaller milling machine can be brought in the remove additional material in these areas. Patching can be performed after the milling operation for cases where a minimal amount of stripping is present or in the areas where cracks are milled deeper than the remaining roadway. Please note that the milling depth should also take into consideration the original pavement depth that will remain after the milling operation. It is likely that the milling machine will break through the underlying pavement if there will be less than 1.5 inches of the original pavement remaining, thereby causing problems with the milling operation and overlay. PRE-OVERLAY PREPARATION It is recommended that a tack coat is applied between all bituminous layers and prior to placing any bituminous mixtures on the milled surface. The bituminous tack coat material should be applied at a uniform rate of 0.03 to 0.05 gal/yd2 between bituminous layers and 0.07 to 0.10 gal/yd2 on the milled bituminous surface prior to being overlaid. The application rates are for undiluted emulsions (as supplied from the refinery) or MC and RC liquid asphalts. The asphalt emulsion may be further diluted in the field in accordance with Mn/DOT Spec. 2357. Prior to overlaying, it is recommended that deteriorated cracks and wheel-path areas are air blasted and power swept to remove loose material. Air blasting should be completed with high pressure (minimum of 100 psi) equipment. Removal of material at some deteriorated locations may require the use of a small milling machine or handwork, in addition to the high pressure air blasting. Regardless of the patch depth, it is important to remove the entire existing deteriorated pavement. Depressions resulting after air blasting, sweeping, or milling operations that are greater than 1.5 inches in depth and width should be filled with a Bituminous Patching Mixture meeting Mn/DOT Spec. 2231 and compacted with a small vibratory or pneumatic roller. Depressions equal to or less than 1.5 inches in depth and width can be filled with the bituminous wear course mixture. Consideration should be given to allow traffic to drive over deteriorated joints/cracks, after backfilling (if there are a large number of these distressed locations) with the recommended bituminous mixtures and proper compaction, for a period of seven days prior to placement of the wear course mixture. The proposed seven-day delay period will permit traffic to apply additional compaction to the joint/crack backfill. If further compaction is not deemed necessary, then patching of depressions greater than 1.5 inches in depth and width can be completed ahead of the paver and compacted with a small vibratory or pneumatic roller. As previously stated, the smaller depressions will be filled in by the wearing course paving operations. If the pavement surface, after milling, is lower than the adjacent shoulders, the contractor (as directed by the Engineer), should construct outlet trenches and take other measures necessary to provide adequate surface drainage for the milled areas. It is recommended that a notch at least 1 inch deep be milled to allow the placement of 1 inch minimum bituminous wearing course at the ends of transitions. Page 2 of 2 01REP020 (07/08) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BITUMINOUS OVERLAY MILLING AND PREPARTION Please note that as this will be a bonded overlay (i.e., bonded to the milled surface), the amount of pre-overlay repair that must be performed on an existing pavement is critical to the performance of the overlay. Similarly, reflection crack control measures must be applied to these overlays, such as the selection of bituminous mixture and PG binder type. Depending upon the frequency of existing transverse cracks it may be prudent to select a bituminous mixture and PG binder that will crack at the existing frequency but be more resistant to degradation from environmental effects such as moisture. Other considerations include subdrainage, traffic, pavement widening, and shoulders. As a general rule, all the distress types in an existing pavement that are likely to affect the performance of an overlay within a few years should be repaired. The designer should also consider the tradeoffs between pre-overlay repair and the thickness and type of overlay selected. For instance, if the existing pavement is severely deteriorated, an overlay type that is less sensitive to existing pavement conditions may be more cost effective without extensive pre-overlay repair. BITUMINOUS PLACEMENT The bituminous mixture should meet the most current Mn/DOT Spec. 2360 (Plant-Mixed Asphalt Pavement: Combined 2360/2360 Gyratory/Marshall Design Specification) requirements. Compaction of all bituminous mixtures should be by the “Maximum Density Method”. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Figures Figures 1-5 – Bituminous Thickness by GPR, Core and Soil Boring Locations """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " " "" " " """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" " """""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""" """"""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" @A @A @A @A @A @A @?@?@? @? @? @? @? C-7 C-6 C-5 C-4 C-3C-2C-1 B-6 B-5 B-4 B-3 B-2 B-1 Ne z P e r c e D r Lake Lucy RdPowers BlvdTroendle CirVineland Ct Treetop RdPeacefu l Ln Ho p i R dRedman AveSources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Testing Locations AET Project No. 28-20267 Lake Lucy Road AreaCarver County, MN015075 Feet ± File: 28-20267-1 Lake Lucy.mxd Date: 02/14/2020 AMERICANENGINEERINGTESTING, INC Figure 1Map Reference: Date: 02/14/2020 Bituminous Thickness by GPR, Test Locations Legend @?Pavement Core Location @A Boring/Pavement Core LocationBituminous Thickness "<3 in. "3-4 in. "4-5 in. "5-6 in. "6-7 in. "7-8 in. ">8 in. """ """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" @A @A @A @A @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? C-9 C-8 C-15 C-14 C-13 C-12 C-11 C-10 B-9B-8 B-7 B-10 Carver Beach Rd Redwing LnHighland DrKerber BlvdPowers BlvdChaparral LnNez Perce DrPenamint Ln Pena m i n t C t Nez P e r c e C t Forest RdChaparral CtCree Dr 68th St W Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Testing Locations AET Project No. 28-20267 Redwing Lane AreaCarver County, MN015075 Feet ± File: 28-20267-2 Redwing.mxd Date: 02/14/2020 AMERICANENGINEERINGTESTING, INC Figure 2Map Reference: Date: 02/14/2020 Bituminous Thickness by GPR, Test Locations Legend @?Pavement Core Location @A Boring/Pavement Core LocationBituminous Thickness "<3 in. "3-4 in. "4-5 in. "5-6 in. ">6 in. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @? @?@? @? @? @? @? @? @?@? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @?@? @? @? @? @? @? C-54 C-51 C-50 C-49 C-48 C-47 C-46 C-45 C-44 C-43 C-42 C-41 C-40 C-39 C-38 C-37 C-36 C-35 C-34 C-33 C-32 C-31 C-30 C-29 C-28 C-27 C-26C-25C-24 C-23 C-22 C-21 C-20 C-19 C-18C-17 C-16 B-25 B-24 B-23 B-22 B-21 B-20 B-19 B-18 B-17 B-16B-15 B-14 B-13 B-12 B-11 Pleasant View Rd Ca s t l e R i d g e W 192nd AveNe a r M o u n t a i n B l v d State Hwy 101Oxbow BendChanhassen RdC a s c a d e P a s s Mountain Way Trappers Pass Co Rd 62 Townline Rd Cascade Cir Ca s t l e R i d g e C t Timbe r H i l l R d Shasta Cir E Olympic Cir Shasta Cir W Casc a d e C t Pleasant View CirPiedmont Ct Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Testing Locations AET Project No. 28-20267 Trappers Pass EastCarver County, MN0200100 Feet ± File: 28-20267-3 Trappers E.mxd Date: 02/14/2020 AMERICANENGINEERINGTESTING, INC Figure 3Map Reference: Date: 02/14/2020 Bituminous Thickness by GPR, Test Locations Legend @?Pavement Core Location @A Boring/Pavement Core LocationBituminous Thickness "<3 in. "3-4 in. "4-5 in. "5-6 in. "6-7 in. ">7 in. """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""" """""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""" """"""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" "" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""" """" """ @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A@A @A @A @A @A @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @?@? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @?C-69 C-68 C-67 C-66 C-65 C-64 C-63 C-62 C-61 C-60 C-59 C-58 C-57 C-56 C-55 C-54 C-53 C-52 C-51 C-50 C-49 C-48 C-46 C-45 B-39 B-38 B-37 B-36 B-35 B-34 B-33 B-32 B-31 B-30 B-29 B-28 B-27 B-26 B-25 B-23 Oxbow BendTrappers Pass S u m m i t C i r Trapline L n P l e a s a n t V i e w R d Tim b e r H i l l R d Tr a p l i n e C i r Moun t a i n W a y Ind i a n H i l l R d Fox Hollo w D r St a g h o r n L n Oxbow Bend Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Testing Locations AET Project No. 28-20267 Trappers Pass WestCarver County, MN0200100 Feet ± File: 28-20267-4 Trappers W.mxd Date: 02/14/2020 AMERICANENGINEERINGTESTING, INC Figure 4Map Reference: Date: 02/14/2020 Bituminous Thickness by GPR, Test Locations Legend @?Pavement Core Location @A Boring/Pavement Core LocationBituminous Thickness "< 3 in. "3-4 in. "4-5 in. "5-6 in. "6-7 in. "> 7 in. """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" "" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @A @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @? @?@? @? @? @?C-82 C-81 C-80 C-79C-78 C-77 C-76 C-75 C-74 C-73 C-72 C-71 C-70 B-48 B-47 B-46 B-45 B-44 B-43 B-42 B-41 B-40 Lake DrDakota LnMain StMa r s h D r Erie AveHidden CtHidden LnCheyenne AveState Hwy 5 Erie CirGrandview RdState Hwy 101Great Plains BlvdArboretum Blvd Pond Promenade Dakota AveSinnen Cir H i d d e n C i r Erie SprDakota Cir Cheyenne Spr 80th St N Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Testing Locations AET Project No. 28-20267 Marsh Drive AreaCarver County, MN0250125 Feet ± File: 28-20267-5 Marsh Drive.mxd Date: 02/14/2020 AMERICANENGINEERINGTESTING, INC Figure 5Map Reference: Date: 02/14/2020 Bituminous Thickness by GPR, Test Locations Legend @?Pavement Core Location @A Boring/Pavement Core LocationBituminous Thickness ">3 in. "3-4 in. "4-5 in. "5-6 in. ">6 in. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Page 2 of 19 Appendix A Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing GPR Data Analysis Results Appendix A Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing Report No. 28-20267 Appendix A - Page 1 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. A.1 FIELD EXPLORATION The pavement structural conditions at the site were evaluated nondestructively using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). The description of the equipment precedes the GPR Data and Analysis Results in this appendix. A.2 EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION A.2.1 GSSI GPR Test System The GPR test system owned by AET is a GSSI Roadscan System that consists of a bumper-mounted, 2 GHz air-coupled antenna and a SIR-30 control and data acquisition processor, featuring dual channels. The GPR processor, including a SIR-30 data acquisition system, wheel-mounted DMI (Distance Measuring Instrument), and a tough book with the SIR-30 Field Program constitutes the newest, most sophisticated GSSI Test System, which fulfills or exceeds all requirements to meet ASTM-4748, ASTM D-6087 Standards. Figure A1 provides a view of this equipment. Figure A1 GSSI 2 GHz air-coupled GPR Test System The GPR antenna emits a high frequency electromagnetic wave into the material under investigation. The reflected energy caused by changes in the electromagnetic properties within the material is detected by a receiver antenna and recorded for subsequent analysis. The 2 GHz air-coupled GPR is capable of collecting radar waveforms at more than 100 signals per second, allows for data to be collected at driving speeds along the longitudinal dimension of the pavements or bridge decks with the antennas fixed at the rear or in front of the vehicle. The antenna used for Roadscan is the Horn antenna Model 4105 (2 GHz). The 2 GHz antenna is the current antenna of choice for road survey because it combines excellent resolution with reasonable depth penetration (18-24 inches in pavement materials). The data collection is performed at normal driving speeds (45-55 mph), requiring no lane closures nor causing traffic congestion. At this peed the 2 GHz antenna is capable of collecting data at 1-foot interval (1 scan/foot). The data were collected at a rate of about 1 vertical scans per foot. Each vertical scan consisted of 512 samples and the record length in time of each scan was 12 nanoseconds. Filters used during acquisition were 300 MHz high pass and 5,000 MHz low pass. In a GPR test, the antenna is moved continuously across the test surface and the control unit collects data at a specified distance increment. In this way, the data collection rate is independent of the scan rate. Alternatively, scanning can be performed at a constant rate of time, regardless of the scan distance. Single point scans can be performed as well. Data is reviewed on-screen and in the field to identify reflections and ensure proper data collection parameters. Field testing is performed in accordance with the standard ASTM procedures as described in ASTM D 4695-96, “Standard Guide for General Pavement Deflection Measurements”. A.2.2 System Calibrations Horn antenna processing is used to get the velocity of the radar energy in the material by comparing the reflection strengths (amplitudes) from a pavement layer interface with a perfect reflector (a metal plate). The calibration scan is obtained with the horn antenna placed over a metal plate at the same elevation as a scan obtained over pavement . The same setting for data collection is used for metal plate calibration. Fifteen seconds are need for j umping up and down on the vehicle’s bumper to collect the full range of motion for the vehicle’s shocks . The filename of raw calibration file is recorded. Appendix A - Page 2 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. Survey wheel is calibrated by laying out a long distance (> 50 feet) with tape measure. A.2.3 Linear Distance and Spatial Reference System Distance measuring instrument (DMI) is a trailer mounted two phase encoder system. When DMI is connected to the SIR-30 it provides for automatic display and recording distance information in both English and metric units with a 1 foot (0.3 meters) resolution and four percent accuracy when calibrated using provided procedure in the Field Program. Spatial reference system is a Trimble ProXH Global Positioning System (GPS) that consists of fully integrated receiver, antenna and battery unit with Trimble’s new H-Star™ technology to provide subfoot (30 cm) post processed accuracy. The External Patch antenna is added to the ProXH receiver for the position of the loading plate. The External Patch antenna can be conveniently elevated with the optional baseball cap to prevent any signal blockage. A.2.4 Camera Monitoring System A battery operated independent DC-1908E multi-functional digital camera with a SD card is used for easy positioning of the loading plate or of the pavement surface condition at the testing locations. A.3 SAMPLING METHODS At the project level, the testing interval is set at 12 scans per foot in the Outside Wheel Path (OWP) = 2.5 ft ± 0.25 ft (0.76 m ± 0.08 m) for nominal 12 ft (3.7 m) wide lanes at a survey speed of approximately 10 mph. Where a divided roadbed exists, surveys will be taken in both directions if the project will include improvements in both directions. If there is more than one lane in one direction the surveys will be taken in the outer driving lane (truck lane) versus the passing lane of the highway. GPR tests are performed at a constant lateral offset down the test section. When GPR tests are performed on bridge decks, multiple survey lines are followed transversely at 2-foot spacing between survey lines. At the network level, GPR tests on one scan per foot are set to be able to collect data on pavements at driving speeds, without statistically compromising the quality of the data collected. If GPR tests are for the in situ characterization of material GPR data will be collected at two scan per foot at slower driving speeds. A.4 QUALITY CONTROL (QC) AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) Beside the daily metal plate calibration the DMI is also calibrated monthly by driving the vehicle over a known distance to calculate the distance scale factor. The GPR will be monitored in real time in the data collection vehicle to minimize data errors. The GPR units will be identified with a unique number and that number will accompany all data reported from that unit as required in the QC/QA plan. Scheduled preventive maintenance ensures proper equipment operation and helps identify potential problems that can be corrected to avoid poor quality or missing data that results if the equipment malfunctions while on site. The routine and major maintenance procedures established by the LTPP are adopted and any maintenance has been done at the end of the day after the testing is complete and become part of the routine performed at the end of each test/travel day and on days when no other work is scheduled. To insure quality data, the GPR assessments only took place on dry pavement surfaces, and data was collected in each wheel path. A.5 DATA ANALYSIS METHODS A.5.1 Data Editing Field acquisition is seldom so routine that no errors, omissions or data redundancy occur. Data editing encompasses issues such as data re-organization, data file merging, data header or background information updates, repositioning and inclusion of elevation information with the data. A.5.2 Basic Processing Basic data processing addresses some of the fundamental manipulations applied to data to make a more acceptable product for initial interpretation and data evaluation. In most instances this type of processing is already applied in real-time to generate the real-time display. The advantage of post survey processing is that the basic processing can be done more systematically and non-causal operators to remove or enhance certain features can be applied. The Reflection Picking procedure is used to eliminate unwanted noise, detects significant reflections, and records the corresponding time and depth. It uses antenna calibration file data to calculate the radar signal velocity within the pavement. Appendix A Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing Report No. 28-20267 Appendix A - Page 3 of 3 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. A.5.3 Advance Processing Advanced data processing addresses the types of processing which require a certain amount of operator bias to be applied and which will result in data which are significantly different from the raw information which were input to the processing. A.5.4 Data Interpretation The EZ Tracker Layer Interpretation procedure uses the output from the first step to map structural layers and calculate the corresponding velocities and depths. A.6 TEST LIMITATIONS A.6.1 Test Methods The data derived through the testing program have been used to develop our opinions about the pavement conditions at your site. However, because no testing program can reveal totally what is in the subsurface, conditions between test locations and at other times, may differ from conditions described in this report. The testing we conducted identified pavement conditions only at those points where we measured pavement thicknesses and observed pavement surface conditions. Depending on the sampling methods and sampling frequency, every location may not be tested, and some anomalies which are present in the pavement may not be noted on the testing results. If conditions encountered during construction differ from those indicated by our testing, it may be necessary to alter our conclusions and recommendations, or to modify construction procedures, and the cost of construction may be affected. A.6.2 Test Standards Pavement testing is done in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. A.7 SUPPORTING TEST METHODS A.7.1 Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) If the pavement layer moduli and subgrade soil strength are desired the deflection data are collected using a Dynatest 8000 FWD Test System that consists of a Dynatest 8002 trailer and a third generation control and data acquisition unit developed in 2003, called the Dynatest Compact15, featuring fifteen (15) deflection channels. The new generation FWD, including a Compact15 System and a standard PC with the FwdWin field Program constitutes the newest, most sophisticated Dynatest FWD Test System, which fulfills or exceeds all requirements to meet ASTM-4694, ASTM D-4695 Standards. The system provides continuous data at pre-set spacing. A.7.2 Soil Boring/Coring Field Exploration If both pavement thicknesses and subgrade soil types and conditions are desired the shallow coring/boring and sampling is used. The limited number of coring/boring is necessary to verify the GPR layer thickness data. A.7.3 Pavement Surface Condition Survey The type and severity of pavement distress influence the deflection response for a pavement. Therefore, GPR operators record any distress located from about 1 ft (0.3 m) in front of vehicle to about 30 ft (9 m) ahead. This information is recorded in the FWD file using the comment line in the field program immediately following the test Appendix A Ground Penetrating Radar Field Exploration and Testing Report No. 28-20267 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S01 BP 3.9 15%3.3 2.9 3.9 12%3.5 2.8 From:To:Nez Perce Dr Base 11.5 10%10.4 7.2 11.2 8%10.4 8.4 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Powers Blvd Lake Lucy Road WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores C-3 B-1 C-1C-2 B-2 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S02 BP 5.0 22%4.0 3.4 4.9 18%4.1 2.7 From:To:Lake Lucy Rd Base 11.5 19%9.2 5.8 12.4 19%10.2 5.7 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Cul-de-Sac Nez Perce Dr SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores C-6 B-5 C-4 B-3 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S03 BP 5.0 19%4.2 3.4 5.2 18%4.4 3.8 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 11.1 13%9.3 7.9 10.9 10%9.7 7.7 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Nez Perce Dr Vineland Ct EB WB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP EB Base WB Base Pavement Cores C-5 B-4 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S04 BP 4.2 9%3.8 3.6 4.4 12%3.9 3.4 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 10.4 9%9.5 8.8 10.1 9%9.3 7.8 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Nez Perce Dr Troendle Cir SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores C-7 B-6 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S05 BP 4.5 12%3.9 3.5 4.6 11%4.1 3.5 From:To:Kerber Blvd Base 11.0 16%9.0 6.2 10.4 17%8.7 5.3 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Carver Beach Rd Redwing Ln SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores C-8 B-7 C-9C-10 B-8 C-11 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S06 BP 4.6 7%4.3 3.8 4.6 8%4.3 3.8 From:To:Redwing Ln Base 7.5 24%5.4 3.9 8.2 23%6.6 3.6 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Carver Beach Rd Penamint Ln SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores C-13 B-9 C-12 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S07 BP 4.5 8%4.2 3.9 4.5 8%4.1 3.7 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 12.2 9%10.9 10.1 12.3 7%11.4 10.4 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Penamint Ln Penamint Ct SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores C-14 C-15 B-10 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S08 BP 4.7 23%3.7 3.0 4.8 18%4.1 3.4 From:To:500' N of Trappers Pass Base 11.3 18%8.8 7.1 9.8 16%8.2 5.8 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Pleasantview Rd Near Mountain Blvd NB SB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP NB Base SB Base Pavement Cores C-16 C-41 C-40C-38 C-37 B-22B-21B-20 C-36 B-11 C-44 C-43 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S09 BP 4.2 10%3.8 3.4 4.2 14%3.6 3.2 From:To:Vine Hill Rd Base 10.2 11%9.0 7.8 10.2 10%9.2 7.1 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Near Mountain Blvd Castle Ridge NB SB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP NB Base SB Base Pavement Cores C-17 C-32 B-19 C-35 C-29 C-28 C-33 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S10 BP 4.2 12%3.7 3.0 4.4 11%3.9 3.3 From:To:Castle Ridge N Intersection Base 9.1 18%7.3 5.7 9.1 10%8.3 6.7 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Castle Ridge S Intersection Cascade Pass SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores C-26 C-22 C-23 B-13B-14 C-25 B-15 C-21 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S11 BP 4.8 12%4.2 3.9 4.7 11%4.2 3.6 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 10.1 11%9.1 7.2 10.1 11%8.8 8.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Cascade Pass Cascade Ct WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores C-24 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S12 BP 4.4 12%3.9 3.4 4.9 14%4.0 3.8 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 13.1 6%12.1 11.1 13.2 5%12.6 11.6 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Castle Ridge S Intersection Cascade Cir WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores B-16 C-27 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S13 BP 4.1 15%3.5 3.1 4.5 13%4.0 3.5 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 8.9 13%7.9 6.2 9.9 21%7.9 6.7 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Castle Ridge Shasta Cir E WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores B-18 C-31 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S14 BP 4.7 23%3.6 3.1 4.8 14%4.3 4.0 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 9.4 16%7.7 6.3 10.0 15%8.5 6.5 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Castle Ridge Shasta Cir W WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores C-30 B-17 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S15 BP 4.6 23%3.3 3.0 5.0 11%4.4 4.0 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 5.5 25%3.9 3.1 5.0 19%4.0 3.5 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Castle Ridge Olympic Cir EB WB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP EB Base WB Base Pavement Cores C-34 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S16 BP 5.0 19%4.0 3.6 5.3 21%4.3 3.7 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 9.2 11%8.4 6.5 9.1 20%7.5 4.9 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Castle Ridge Castle Ridge Ct WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores C-20 C-18 C-19 B-12 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S17 BP 4.3 14%3.7 3.3 4.4 9%4.0 3.6 From:To:Oxbox Bend Base 10.2 19%8.5 4.7 9.4 23%7.1 3.7 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Near Mountain Blvd Mountain Way WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores B-24 C-48C-47 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S18 BP 5.1 9%4.6 4.3 5.0 10%4.5 4.0 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 9.7 9%8.9 7.4 8.2 11%7.1 6.8 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Near Mountain Blvd Mountain View Ct WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores C-39 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S19 BP 3.9 21%3.2 2.4 4.0 19%3.2 2.4 From:To:Oxbow Bend (clockwise loop)Base 9.8 13%8.4 6.5 9.7 15%8.1 5.5 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Trappers Pass Oxbow Bend WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement CoresOxbowBend Loop*Graph split into two sections at Oxbow Bend Loop marking. The next two pages include each section. * American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S19 BP 4.5 19%3.6 2.6 4.4 16%3.6 2.8 From:To:Oxbow Bend (clockwise loop)Base 10.0 16%8.4 6.5 10.2 16%8.3 6.4 Oxbow Bend Trappers Pass GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Layer WB EB -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores C-49 B-34B-28 C-53 B-27 C-51 B-26 C-50 B-25 C-60 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S19 BP 3.6 17%3.0 2.4 3.8 19%3.1 2.4 From:To:Oxbow Bend (clockwise loop)Base 9.6 11%8.4 6.5 9.4 13%8.1 5.5 Oxbow Bend Oxbow Bend (clockwise loop) GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Layer WB EB -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 2130 2630 3130 3630 4130 4630 5130 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores B-36 C-64 B-35 C-63 C-62 C-61 B-39 C-69 C-68 B-38 C-65 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S21 BP 4.6 17%3.7 3.2 4.8 20%3.9 3.3 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 10.6 10%9.6 8.2 11.3 11%10.0 7.3 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Oxbow Bend Summit Cir SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores C-66 B-37 C-67 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S22 BP 4.8 19%3.9 3.2 4.9 24%3.7 2.8 From:To:Oxbow Bend (S)Base 10.4 13%8.9 6.8 9.3 21%7.4 5.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Near Mountain Blvd Trappers Pass SW NE Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SW BP NE BP SW Base NE Base Pavement Cores C-45 C-59 B-33B-32B-29 C-54C-46 B-23 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S23 BP 4.8 11%4.3 3.9 5.0 18%4.1 3.5 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 9.0 7%8.4 7.5 8.3 13%7.1 6.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Near Mountain Blvd Piedmont Ct EB WB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP EB Base WB Base Pavement Cores C-42 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S24 BP 4.1 15%3.6 3.2 5.0 14%4.4 3.5 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 8.8 23%6.9 5.5 7.8 24%5.6 4.6 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Trappers Pass Stag Horn Ln NB SB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey NB BP SB BP NB Base SB Base Pavement Cores C-58 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S25 BP 4.4 19%3.6 3.3 4.5 14%4.0 3.4 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 8.0 11%7.3 6.1 10.2 12%8.9 7.9 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Trappers Pass Trap Line Cir EB WB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP EB Base WB Base Pavement Cores B-30 C-55 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S26 BP 4.7 14%4.1 3.7 5.3 12%4.5 4.0 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 9.2 18%7.6 3.3 9.1 13%8.1 6.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Trappers Pass Trap Line Lane WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores C-56 B-31 C-57 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S27 BP 4.2 14%3.7 3.2 4.5 13%3.9 3.4 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 11.2 8%10.2 8.8 10.3 14%9.1 6.0 *Gaps in data are due to snow and/or ice coverage of roadway GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Lake Dr E Hidden Ct SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores B-40 B-41 C-71C-70 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S28 BP 4.1 11%3.7 3.0 4.4 13%3.7 3.1 From:To:Hidden Ct Base 10.6 9%9.6 8.4 9.7 11%8.8 8.0 GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Marsh Dr Hidden Ln EB WB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 800.00 900.00 1000.00 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey EB BP WB BP EB Base WB Base Pavement Cores C-72 B-42 C-74 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S29 BP 4.9 18%3.9 3.4 4.5 21%3.2 2.8 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!#NUM!0.0 *A discernable possible aggregate base layer was not identified in the GPR data. GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Hidden Ln Hidden Cir SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450.00 500.00 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores C-73 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S30 BP 4.2 13%3.6 3.1 4.1 15%3.4 2.9 From:To:Dakota Ln Base 10.8 14%9.3 7.9 10.7 11%9.6 8.2 *Gaps in the possible base layer are due to the layer exceeding the collection viewing window. GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Lake Dr E Marsh Dr SB NB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey SB BP NB BP SB Base NB Base Pavement Cores B-43 B-46B-44 C-77C-76C-75 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S31 BP 4.7 13%4.1 3.6 4.6 13%3.9 3.7 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 11.2 14%9.6 7.2 10.5 18%8.3 6.5 *Gaps in the possible base layer are due to the layer exceeding the available viewing window. GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Marsh Dr Sinnen Cir WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450.00 500.00 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores B-45 American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 Phone: (651) 659-9001 Fax: (651) 659-1379 Units:inches Project:Date:2/24/20 AET Job No.:28-20267 Test Date:1/28/20 Average CV 15th Min.Average CV 15th Min. Road:Section/Grid:S32 BP 4.3 16%3.6 2.5 4.0 13%3.5 3.1 From:To:Cul-de-sac Base 11.4 9%10.4 9.1 11.1 18%8.8 6.1 *Gaps in the bituminous surface layer are due to snow and/or ice coverage and gaps in the possible base layer are due to the layer exceeding the collection viewing window. GENERAL INFORMATION: GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SUMMARY STATISTICS 2020 Pavement Improvements Erie Cir Dakota Ln WB EB Layer -20.0 -18.0 -16.0 -14.0 -12.0 -10.0 -8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0.0 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 Depth (in)GPR Distance (ft) Ground Penetrating Radar Pavement Thickness Survey WB BP EB BP WB Base EB Base Pavement Cores C-79 B-47 C-78 C-80 C-81C-82 B-48 Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Appendix B Pavement Core Log Photos Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 1 Core ID:B-1 Condition: Road:Lake Lucy Road Segment ID:S01 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Core ID:C-1 Condition: Road:Lake Lucy Road Segment ID:S01 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Minimal stripping throughout core. Bottom-up crack visible in core. Minimal stripping throughout core. Bottom-up crack visible in core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 2 Core ID:C-2 Condition: Road:Lake Lucy Road Segment ID:S01 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Core ID:B-2 Condition: Road:Lake Lucy Road Segment ID:S01 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping and crack throughout core. Moderate stripping and crack throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 3 Core ID:C-3 Condition: Road:Lake Lucy Road Segment ID:S01 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Core ID:B-3 Condition: Road:Nez Perce Drive Segment ID:S02 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Severe stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 4 Core ID:C-4 Condition: Road:Nez Perce Drive Segment ID:S02 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Core ID:B-5 Condition: Road:Nez Perce Drive Segment ID:S02 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 5 Core ID:C-6 Condition: Road:Nez Perce Drive Segment ID:S02 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Core ID:C-5 Condition: Road:Vineland Court Segment ID:S03 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Severe stripping in upper portion of core and moderate stripping in lower portion of core. Core broken at 1.5-inches. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 6 Core ID:B-4 Condition: Road:Vineland Court Segment ID:S03 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Core ID:C-7 Condition: Road:Troendle Circle Segment ID:S04 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping in upper portion of core becoming severe in lower portion of core. Minimal to moderate stripping in upper portion of core becoming severe in lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 7 Core ID:B-6 Condition: Road:Troendle Circle Segment ID:S04 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Core ID:C-7 Condition: Road:Troendle Circle Segment ID:S04 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Minimal stripping in upper portion of core becoming severe in lower portion of core. Minimal stripping in upper portion of core becoming severe in lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 8 Condition:Core ID: C-8 Road: Redwing Lane Segment ID:S05 Total Height:4.3" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:1.7" Lift 2:2.6" Condition:Core ID: B-7 Road: Redwing Lane Segment ID:S05 Total Height:6.6"Lift 2:2.8" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:1.2"Lift 3:2.6" Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 9 Condition:Core ID: C-9 Road: Redwing Lane Segment ID:S05 Total Height:4.25" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:2.25" Lift 2:2.00" Condition:Core ID: C-10 Road: Redwing Lane Segment ID:S05 Total Height:4.25" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:2.25" Lift 2:2.00" Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 10 Condition:Core ID: B-8 Road: Redwing Lane Segment ID:S05 Total Height:4.1" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:2.0" Lift 2:2.1" Condition:Core ID: C-11 Road: Redwing Lane Segment ID:S05 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Total Height:4.2" Lift 1:2.5" Lift 2:1.7" Minimal stripping in upper portion of core becoming severe in lower portion of Minimal to moderate stripping in upper portion of core becoming severe in lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 11 Core ID:C-12 Condition: Road:Penamint Lane Segment ID:S06 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Total Height:4.25" Lift 1:2.1" Core ID:B-9 Condition: Road:Penamint Lane Segment ID:S06 Total Height:2.3" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:2.3" Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Bottom portion of core appears broken during the coring operation. Moderate stripping and crack throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 12 Core ID:C-13 Condition: Road:Penamint Lane Segment ID:S06 Date Cored:1/20/2020 Total Height:4.4"Lift 2:2.0" Lift 1:2.3" Core ID:C-14 Condition: Road:Penamint Court Segment ID:S07 Total Height:4.3" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:2.0" Lift 2:2.3" Moderate stripping throughout core. Moderate stripping throughout core increasing in severity with depth. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 13 Core ID:B-10 Condition: Road:Penamint Court Segment ID:S07 Total Height:4.5" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:2.1" Lift 2:2.4" Core ID:C-15 Condition: Road:Penamint Court Segment ID:S07 Total Height:4.25" Date Cored:1/20/2020 Lift 1:2.25" Lift 2:2.00" Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 14 Core ID:C-16 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:B-11 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Upper portion of core generally solid, severe stripping in lower portion of core. Upper portion of core generally solid, moderate stripping in lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 15 Core ID:C-36 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:B-20 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Moderate stripping throughout entire core. Severe stripping and crack throughout core. Core broken at 3.5-inches. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 16 Core ID:C-37 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-38 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 17 Core ID:B-21 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-40 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Severe stripping and crack throughout core. Moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 18 Core ID:C-41 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:B-22 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 19 Core ID:C-43 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-44 Condition: Road:Near Mountain Boulevard Segment ID:S08 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal stripping in upper portion of core, becoming moderate in lower portion of core. Moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 20 Core ID:C-17 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Road Segment ID:S09 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-35 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Road Segment ID:S09 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. Severe stripping in upper portion of core, moderate stripping in lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 21 Core ID:B-19 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Road Segment ID:S09 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-33 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Road Segment ID:S09 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Severe stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 22 Core ID:C-32 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Road Segment ID:S09 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-29 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Road Segment ID:S09 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Severe stripping and crack throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 23 Core ID:C-28 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Road Segment ID:S09 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-21 Condition: Road:Cascade Pass Segment ID:S10 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Moderate stripping throughout core. Bottom-up crack visible in core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 24 Core ID:B-13 Condition: Road:Cascade Pass Segment ID:S10 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-22 Condition: Road:Cascade Pass Segment ID:S10 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Core broken at 2.5- inches. Severe stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 25 Core ID:C-23 Condition: Road:Cascade Pass Segment ID:S10 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:B-14 Condition: Road:Cascade Pass Segment ID:S10 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Moderate stripping throughout core. Moderate stripping in upper portion of core becoming severe in lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 26 Core ID:C-25 Condition: Road:Cascade Pass Segment ID:S10 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:B-15 Condition: Road:Cascade Pass Segment ID:S10 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. Moderate to severe stripping and crack throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 27 Core ID:C-26 Condition: Road:Cascade Pass Segment ID:S10 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-24 Condition: Road:Cascade Court Segment ID:S11 Total Height:4.3" Date Cored:1/21/2020 Lift 1:2.1" Lift 2:2.2" Upper portion of the core generally solid. Moderate stripping in lower portion of core. Minimal stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 28 Core ID:B-16 Condition: Road:Cascade Circle Segment ID:S12 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-27 Condition: Road:Cascade Circle Segment ID:S12 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping in upper portion of core. Generally solid throughout lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 29 Core ID:B-17 Condition: Road:Shasta Circle W Segment ID:S13 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-30 Condition: Road:Shasta Circle W Segment ID:S13 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 30 Core ID:B-18 Condition: Road:Shasta Circle E Segment ID:S14 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-31 Condition: Road:Shasta Circle E Segment ID:S14 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. Moderate to severe stripping and crack throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 31 Core ID:C-34 Condition: Road:Olympic Circle Segment ID:S15 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-20 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Court Segment ID:S16 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 32 Core ID:B-12 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Court Segment ID:S16 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-19 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Court Segment ID:S16 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core, increasing in severity with depth. Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 33 Core ID:C-18 Condition: Road:Castle Ridge Court Segment ID:S16 Date Cored:1/21/2020 Core ID:C-47 Condition: Road:Mountain Way Segment ID:S17 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Moderate stripping throughout core. Bottom-up crack visible in core. Severe stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 34 Core ID:B-24 Condition: Road:Mountain Way Segment ID:S17 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-48 Condition: Road:Mountain Way Segment ID:S17 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Minimal stripping in upper portion of core, becoming moderate to severe in lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 35 Core ID:C-39 Condition: Road:Mountain View Court Segment ID:S18 Total Height:5.4" Date Cored:1/21/2020 Lift 1:2.7" Lift 2:2.7" Core ID:C-49 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 36 Core ID:B-25 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-50 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Severe stripping throughout core. Core broken at 0.75- inches. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 37 Core ID:B-26 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-51 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 38 Core ID:B-27 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-53 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core generally solid. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Core broken at 2-inches. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 39 Core ID:B-28 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:B-34 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Core broken in several areas. Severe stripping throughout core. Core broken in several areas. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 40 Core ID:C-60 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-61 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 41 Core ID:C-62 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-63 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Core broken at 2.75-inches. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 42 Core ID:B-35 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-64 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Core broken at 2.75-inches. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 43 Core ID:B-36 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-65 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core generally solid. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 44 Core ID:B-38 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-68 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 45 Core ID:C-69 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:B-39 Condition: Road:Oxbow Bend Segment ID:S19 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Severe stripping throughout core. Core broken at 1.5- inches. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 46 Core ID:C-52 Condition: Road:Rojina Lane Segment ID:S20 Total Height:4.3" Date Cored:1/22/2020 Lift 1:2.1" Lift 2:2.2" Core ID:C-66 Condition: Road:Summit Circle Segment ID:S21 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 47 Core ID:B-37 Condition: Road:Summit Circle Segment ID:S21 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-67 Condition: Road:Summit Circle Segment ID:S21 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to severe stripping throughout core, increasing in severity with depth. Core broken at 2.25-inches. Core generally solid. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 48 Core ID:C-59 Condition: Road:Trappers Pass Segment ID:S22 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:B-33 Condition: Road:Trappers Pass Segment ID:S22 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Moderate stripping throughout core. Core broken at 2.25- inches. Severe stripping throughout core. Core broken at 2-inches. Vertical crack in lower portion of core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 49 Core ID:B-32 Condition: Road:Trappers Pass Segment ID:S22 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:B-29 Condition: Road:Trappers Pass Segment ID:S22 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Severe stripping throughout core. Core broken at 3-inches. Moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 50 Core ID:C-54 Condition: Road:Trappers Pass Segment ID:S22 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-46 Condition: Road:Trappers Pass Segment ID:S22 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 51 Core ID:B-23 Condition: Road:Trappers Pass Segment ID:S22 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-45 Condition: Road:Trappers Pass Segment ID:S22 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 52 Core ID:C-42 Condition: Road:Piedmont Court Segment ID:S23 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-58 Condition: Road:Stag Horn Lane Segment ID:S24 Total Height:5.5" Date Cored:1/22/2020 Lift 1:2.7" Lift 2:2.8" Severe stripping throughout core. Upper portion of core broken. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 53 Core ID:B-30 Condition: Road:Trap Line Circle Segment ID:S25 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:C-55 Condition: Road:Trap Line Circle Segment ID:S25 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Bottom-up crack and horizontal crack at 1.75-inches visible in core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 54 Core ID:C-56 Condition: Road:Trap Line Lane Segment ID:S26 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:B-31 Condition: Road:Trap Line Lane Segment ID:S26 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Moderate to severe stripping throughout core. Severe stripping and crack throughout core. Core broken at 0.75-inches. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 55 Core ID:C-57 Condition: Road:Trap Line Lane Segment ID:S26 Date Cored:1/22/2020 Core ID:B-40 Condition: Road:Hidden Court Segment ID:S27 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal stripping in upper portion of core becoming moderate to severe in lower portion of core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 56 Core ID:C-70 Condition: Road:Hidden Court Segment ID:S27 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:B-41 Condition: Road:Hidden Court Segment ID:S27 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 57 Core ID:C-71 Condition: Road:Hidden Court Segment ID:S27 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:C-72 Condition: Road:Hidden Lane Segment ID:S28 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Intact core unrecoverable. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 58 Core ID:B-42 Condition: Road:Hidden Lane Segment ID:S28 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:C-74 Condition: Road:Hidden Lane Segment ID:S28 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 59 Core ID:C-73 Condition: Road:Hidden Circle Segment ID:S29 Total Height:3.9" Date Cored:1/23/2020 Lift 1:1.9" Lift 2:2.0" Core ID:B-43 Condition: Road:Marsh Drive Segment ID:S30 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 60 Core ID:C-75 Condition: Road:Marsh Drive Segment ID:S30 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:B-44 Condition: Road:Marsh Drive Segment ID:S30 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 61 Core ID:C-76 Condition: Road:Marsh Drive Segment ID:S30 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:C-77 Condition: Road:Marsh Drive Segment ID:S30 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 62 Core ID:B-46 Condition: Road:Marsh Drive Segment ID:S30 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:B-45 Condition: Road:Sinnen Circle Segment ID:S31 Total Height:4.8" Date Cored:1/23/2020 Lift 1:2.4" Lift 2:2.4" Severe stripping throughout core, much of it is crumbling. Core broken at 0.5-inches. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 63 Core ID:C-78 Condition: Road:Dakota Lane Segment ID:S32 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:B-47 Condition: Road:Dakota Lane Segment ID:S32 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. Severe stripping throughout core. Core broken at 1.25- inches. Bottom portion of core cracked. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 64 Core ID:C-79 Condition: Road:Dakota Lane Segment ID:S32 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:C-80 Condition: Road:Dakota Lane Segment ID:S32 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal stripping throughout core. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 65 Core ID:C-81 Condition: Road:Dakota Lane Segment ID:S32 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Core ID:B-48 Condition: Road:Dakota Lane Segment ID:S32 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Severe stripping throughout core, much of core broken in pieces. Core broken at 1-inch. Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 City of Chanhassen 2020 Pavement Improvements 66 Core ID:C-82 Condition: Road:Dakota Lane Segment ID:S32 Date Cored:1/23/2020 Minimal to moderate stripping throughout core. 28-20267 Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 1 Area Segment ID Road ID Recovered Core Core Downhole Measurement Lane B-1 3.6 3.5 11 WB between wheel paths 44.884014 -93.548697 C-1 4.25 4 WB outside wheel path 44.883840 -93.547760 C-2 4.2 3.75 WB inside wheel path 44.883808 -93.546500 B-2 4.25 3.75 10.5 EB between wheel paths 44.883779 -93.545740 C-3 2.8 3 WB outside wheel path 44.883793 -93.544835 B-3 4.1 3.5 12 NB outside wheel path 44.884246 -93.544328 C-4 5.25 5.25 SB outside wheel path 44.884830 -93.544470 B-5 6.25 5.5 9.5 Lane center 44.885495 -93.544355 C-6 5.2 5 EB inside wheel path 44.885916 -93.545026 C-5 4.25 4 WB outside wheel path 44.885134 -93.543796 B-4 4.5 4.5 12 Cul-de-sac near east curb 44.884727 -93.542979 C-7 3.9 3.75 SB inside wheel path 44.885392 -93.545679 B-6 4.15 4 11 Cul-de-sac near east curb 44.884766 -93.545553 C-11 4.2 4.25 Lane center 44.881055 -93.547432 B-8 4.1 4 13 SB inside wheel path 44.880720 -93.547470 C-10 4.25 4.25 NB between wheel paths 44.880090 -93.547330 C-9 4.25 4 SB outside wheel path 44.879497 -93.546623 B-7 6.6 6.25 6 NB between wheel paths 44.879010 -93.546190 C-8 4.3 4 SB inside wheel path 44.878387 -93.546193 C-12 4.25 4 Lane center 44.880084 -93.546293 B-9 2.3*4.5 6 NB outside wheel path 44.880662 -93.545460 C-13 4.4 4 NB inside wheel path 44.881030 -93.545460 C-14 4.3 4.5 SE B inside wheel path 44.879887 -93.545416 B-10 4.5 4.5 14 NW B between wheel paths 44.879751 -93.544979 C-15 4.25 4.5 Cul-de-sac center 44.879437 -93.544231 C-16 4 4 NB inside wheel path 44.887889 -93.523261 B-11 4.3 4 15.5 SB outside wheel path 44.888049 -93.523611 C-36 5.4 5.25 Lane center 44.888326 -93.524488 B-20 5.7 5 9 SB outside wheel path 44.888260 -93.525001 C-37 5 4.75 NB outside wheel path 44.888440 -93.525517 C-38 4.5 4.75 SB between wheel paths 44.888959 -93.525969 B-21 3.4 3 16.5 NB outside wheel path 44.889324 -93.526235 C-40 3.7 3.5 SB outside wheel path 44.889549 -93.526689 C-41 4.8 4.5 NB between wheel paths 44.889845 -93.527116 B-22 5 5 11 SB outside wheel path 44.890364 -93.527178 C-43 8.8 8.5 Lane center 44.890689 -93.526872 C-44 3.6 4 SB between wheel paths 44.891221 -93.526931 LongitudeApproximate Location Trappers Pass Latitude 8 Near Mountain Blvd Red Wing Lane 5 Red Wing Lane 6 Penamint Ln 7 Penamint Ct Bituminous Thickness Measurements, (in)Base Thickness Measurement, (in) Lake Lucy Road 1 Lake Lucy Rd 2 Nez Perce Dr 3 Vineland Ct 4 Troendle Cir 28-20267 Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 2 Area Segment ID Road ID Recovered Core Core Downhole Measurement Lane LongitudeApproximate Location Latitude Bituminous Thickness Measurements, (in)Base Thickness Measurement, (in) C-17 4.2 4 Lane center 44.888517 -93.523758 C-35 6 5.5 SB between wheel paths 44.889008 -93.522970 B-19 4.2 3.75 12 NB between wheel paths 44.889234 -93.522402 C-33 2.7 3 SB between wheel paths 44.889593 -93.522361 C-32 4.4 4.5 NB outside wheel path 44.889935 -93.522309 C-29 4.4 4 SB inside wheel path 44.890650 -93.522820 C-28 4.5 4.75 NB between wheel paths 44.891247 -93.523053 C-21 4.5 4.5 SB inside wheel path 44.889042 -93.523721 B-13 4.4 4.5 8.5 NB between wheel paths 44.889442 -93.524109 C-22 1.8 2 SB outside wheel path 44.889731 -93.524483 C-23 4.6 4.25 NB inside wheel path 44.890119 -93.524780 B-14 4.3 4.5 8.5 SB outside wheel path 44.890489 -93.524910 C-25 4.7 4.5 EB between wheel paths 44.890938 -93.524337 B-15 4 4 9.5 WB between wheel paths 44.890968 -93.523784 C-26 4.5 3 EB inside wheel path 44.890844 -93.523303 11 Cascade Ct C-24 4.3 4 Cul-de-sac near south curb 44.890886 -93.525276 B-16 4.4 4.25 19.75 WB outside wheel path 44.891004 -93.522585 C-27 6.7 6 Cul-de-sac center 44.891036 -93.521537 B-18 3.5 3.5 8.5 WB inside wheel path 44.890242 -93.522009 C-31 5.7 5.5 Cul-de-sac near south curb 44.890148 -93.521613 B-17 5 4.75 15 EB between wheel paths 44.890095 -93.522759 C-30 4.5 4.5 Cul-de-sac near center 44.889978 -93.523155 15 Olympic Cir C-34 5.7 5 Cul-de-sac near east curb 44.889424 -93.521381 C-20 4.1 4 WB outside wheel path 44.888543 -93.523008 B-12 5.2 5.25 9.5 EB outside wheel path 44.888236 -93.522545 C-19 4 4 WB inside wheel path 44.888194 -93.521942 C-18 5.3 5.5 Cul-de-sac near west curb 44.888500 -93.521700 C-47 3.3 3.5 WB inside wheel path 44.888261 -93.526305 B-24 4 4.5 8.5 EB outside wheel path 44.888199 -93.527112 C-48 4.3 4.5 WB between wheel paths 44.888216 -93.528069 18 Mountain View Ct C-39 5.4 5.75 Cul-de-sac near north curb 44.889242 -93.527018 C-49 3.5 4 SB inside wheel path 44.889392 -93.528631 B-25 4.2 4.25 8 NB outside wheel path 44.889041 -93.528712 C-50 4.5 4.5 SB inside wheel path 44.888691 -93.528751 B-26 4.5 6 11 NB outside wheel path 44.888041 -93.528992 C-51 5.1 5.25 SB between wheel paths 44.887681 -93.529413 B-27 4.5 4.5 11 EB outside wheel path 44.887342 -93.530289 C-53 4.2 4 WB inside wheel path 44.887546 -93.531175 B-28 4.8 4.75 9 EB outside wheel path 44.887817 -93.531840 B-34 3.5 5.75 10 WB between wheel paths 44.887922 -93.532861 Oxbow Bend19 12 Trappers Pass Cascade Cir 13 Shasta Cir E 14 Shasta Cir W 16 Castle Ridge Ct 17 Mountain Way 9 Castle Ridge Rd 10 Cascade Pass 28-20267 Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 3 Area Segment ID Road ID Recovered Core Core Downhole Measurement Lane LongitudeApproximate Location Latitude Bituminous Thickness Measurements, (in)Base Thickness Measurement, (in) C-60 4.2 4 EB inside wheel path 44.887791 -93.533385 C-61 4.3 4.5 SB inside wheel path 44.887607 -93.534156 C-62 3.7 3.75 NB inside wheel path 44.886984 -93.534671 C-63 4.8 4.5 NB between wheel paths 44.887147 -93.535413 B-35 3.7 4 10 SB outside wheel path 44.887878 -93.535878 C-64 3.7 3.75 NB inside wheel path 44.888610 -93.536490 B-36 3.3 3.5 12.5 SB outside wheel path 44.889295 -93.536828 C-65 3.5 3.75 EB inside wheel path 44.889582 -93.536107 B-38 3.7 4 11.5 WB between wheel paths 44.889609 -93.534816 C-68 5 5 SB inside wheel path 44.889195 -93.534288 C-69 3.4 3.5 NB inside wheel path 44.888615 -93.534116 B-39 3.8 3.5 15.5 SB outside wheel path 44.888068 -93.534166 20 Rojina Ln C-52 4.3 4.25 Cul-de-sac near south curb 44.887119 -93.530909 C-66 4 4 SB inside wheel path 44.889334 -93.535578 B-37 3.3 4 11 NB between wheel paths 44.888964 -93.535749 C-67 5.4 5.5 Cul-de-sac near west curb 44.888281 -93.535192 C-59 4.6 4.75 SB inside wheel path 44.888275 -93.532195 B-33 4 4 13 NB between wheel paths 44.888674 -93.531906 B-32 5.6 6 11 SB outside wheel path 44.889372 -93.531231 B-29 4.2 8 12.5 EB outside wheel path 44.889881 -93.530520 C-54 4.6 5 WB inside wheel path 44.889882 -93.529347 C-46 4 4 EB outside wheel path 44.889811 -93.528497 B-23 4.2 4.25 20.25 WB outside wheel path 44.889948 -93.528191 C-45 4.2 4 EB inside wheel path 44.889984 -93.527722 23 Piedmont Ct C-42 3.4 4.5 Cul-de-sac near west of center 44.890045 -93.526822 24 Stag Horn Ln C-58 5.5 5.5 Cul-de-sac center 44.888874 -93.532425 B-30 3.6 3.75 10 WB outside wheel path 44.889337 -93.530556 C-55 4.9 5 Cul-de-sac near south curb 44.888895 -93.530229 C-56 5.5 5.5 EB inside wheel path 44.889812 -93.531528 B-31 3.9 3.75 8 WB between wheel paths 44.889996 -93.532104 C-57 6.2 6 Cul-de-sac near south curb 44.889864 -93.532878 B-40 3.5 3.5 13.5 SB outside wheel path 44.858599 -93.526785 C-70 3.9 4 NB inside wheel path 44.857656 -93.526582 B-41 3.5 4 13.5 SB outside wheel path 44.856879 -93.526645 C-71 4 4.5 Cul-de-sac near south curb 44.856030 -93.526739 C-74 3.6 3.5 WB outside wheel path 44.857255 -93.529203 B-42 3.6 4 11 EB outside wheel path 44.857681 -93.528034 C-72 *5 EB between wheel paths 44.858021 -93.527224 29 Hidden Cir C-73 3.9 4 Cul-de-sac center 44.857071 -93.527794 Trappers Pass 19 Oxbow Bend Marsh Drive 25 Trap Line Cir 26 Trap Line Ln 27 Hidden Ct 28 Hidden Ln 21 Summit Cir 22 Trappers Pass 28-20267 Table Summary of Bituminous and Base Thickness 4 Area Segment ID Road ID Recovered Core Core Downhole Measurement Lane LongitudeApproximate Location Latitude Bituminous Thickness Measurements, (in)Base Thickness Measurement, (in) B-43 5.1 5 8.5 SB outside wheel path 44.857335 -93.530114 C-75 4.3 4 NB inside wheel path 44.856695 -93.529881 B-44 3.7 4 10 SB between wheel paths 44.856223 -93.529205 C-76 3.8 4 NB inside wheel path 44.855913 -93.528451 C-77 3.7 4 SB outside wheel path 44.855235 -93.528094 B-46 2.7 3.5 9.5 NB outside wheel path 44.854899 -93.527817 31 Sinnen Cir B-45 4.8 5 9 Cul-de-sac south of center 44.855300 -93.529100 C-82 4.1 4 WB inside wheel path 44.855346 -93.526092 B-48 4.2 4.5 12 NB outside wheel path 44.854800 -93.526550 C-81 3.1*4 SB outside wheel path 44.854502 -93.526689 C-80 4.4 4.5 EB inside wheel path 44.854284 -93.527372 C-79 4 4 Lane center 44.854460 -93.528045 B-47 2.8 3.5 11.5 EB between wheel paths 44.854445 -93.528646 C-78 2.6*6 Cul-de-sac near west curb 44.854402 -93.529313 *An accurate measurement could not be obtained due to deterioration of the pavement core. Marsh Drive 30 Marsh Drive 32 Dakota Ln Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Appendix C Subsurface Field Exploration and Testing Boring Log Notes MnDOT Boring Log Descriptive Terminology AASHTO Soil Classification Subsurface Boring Logs Materials Test Reports Table Summary of Results and Recommendations Appendix C Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing AET No. 28-20267 Appendix C - Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. C.1 FIELD EXPLORATION The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling and sampling 48 flight auger soil borings and 130 pavement cores. The locations of the borings and cores appear on Figures 1 through 5, preceding the Subsurface Boring Logs in this appendix. C.2 SAMPLING METHODS C.2.1 Split-Spoon Samples (SS) - Calibrated to N60 Values Standard penetration (split-spoon) samples were collected in general accordance with ASTM: D1586 with one primary modification. The ASTM test method consists of driving a 2-inch O.D. split-barrel sampler into the in-situ soil with a 140-pound hammer dropped from a height of 30 inches. The sampler is driven a total of 18 inches into the soil. After an initial set of 6 inches, the number of hammer blows to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the standard penetration resistance or N-value. Our method uses a modified hammer weight, which is determined by measuring the system energy using a Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and an instrumented rod. In the past, standard penetration N-value tests were performed using a rope and cathead for the lift and drop system. The energy transferred to the split-spoon sampler was typically limited to about 60% of its potential energy due to the friction inherent in this system. This converted energy then provides what is known as an N60 blow count. The most recent drill rigs incorporate an automatic hammer lift and drop system, which has higher energy efficiency and subsequently results in lower N-values than the traditional N60 values. By using the PDA energy measurement equipment, we can determine actual energy generated by the drop hammer. With the various hammer systems available, we have found highly variable energies ranging from 55% to over 100%. Therefore, the intent of AET’s hammer calibrations is to vary the hammer weight such that hammer energies lie within about 60% to 65% of the theoretical energy of a 140-pound weight falling 30 inches. The current ASTM procedure acknowledges the wide variation in N-values, stating that N-values of 100% or more have been observed. Although we have not yet determined the statistical measurement uncertainty of our calibrated method to date, we can state that the accuracy deviation of the N-values using this method is significantly better than the standard ASTM Method. C.2.2 Disturbed Samples (DS)/Spin-up Samples (SU) Sample types described as “DS” or “SU” on the boring logs are disturbed samples, which are taken from the flights of the auger. Because the auger disturbs the samples, possible soil layering and contact depths should be considered approximate. C.2.3 Sampling Limitations Unless actually observed in a sample, contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of samples and the action of drilling tools. Cobbles, boulders, and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings, and they may be present in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs. Determining the thickness of “topsoil” layers is usually limited, due to variations in topsoil definition, sample recovery, and other factors. Visual-manual description often relies on color for determination, and transitioning changes can account for significant variation in thickness judgment. Accordingly, the topsoil thickness presented on the logs should not be the sole basis for calculating topsoil stripping depths and volumes. If more accurate information is needed relating to thickness and topsoil quality definition, alternate methods of sample retrieval and testing should be employed. C.3 CLASSIFICATION METHODS Soil descriptions shown on the boring logs are based on the Mn/DOT Textural Classification System. Soil descriptions on the boring logs are visual manual judgements, unless laboratory classification tests have been performed. Charts are attached which provide information on the Mn/DOT system, the descriptive terminology, and the symbols used on the boring logs. Visual-manual judgement of the AASHTO Soil Group is also noted as a part of the soil description. A chart presenting details of the AASHTO Soil Classification System is also attached. The boring logs include descriptions of apparent geology. The geologic depositional origin of each soil layer is interpreted primarily by observation of the soil samples, which can be limited. Observations of the surrounding topography, vegetation, and development can sometimes aid this judgment. Appendix C Geotechnical Field Exploration and Testing Report No. 28-20267 Appendix C - Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. C.4 WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS The ground water level measurements are shown at the bottom of the boring logs. The following information appears under “Water Level Measurements” on the logs:  Date and Time of measurement  Sampled Depth: lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement  Casing Depth: depth to bottom of casing or hollow-stem auger at time of measurement  Cave-in Depth: depth at which measuring tape stops in the borehole  Water Level: depth in the borehole where free water is encountered  Drilling Fluid Level: same as Water Level, except that the liquid in the borehole is drilling fluid The true location of the water table at the boring locations may be different than the water levels measured in the boreholes. This is possible because there are several factors that can affect the water level measurements in the borehole. Some of these factors include: permeability of each soil layer in profile, presence of perched water, amount of time between water level readings, presence of drilling fluid, weather conditions, and use of borehole casing. C.5 LABORATORY TEST METHODS C.5.1 Sieve Analysis of Soils (through #200 Sieve) Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-040, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM D6913, Method A. C.5.2 Water Content Tests Conducted per AET Procedure 01-LAB-010, which is performed in general accordance with ASTM D2216 and AASHTO T265. C.6 TEST STANDARD LIMITATIONS Field and laboratory testing is done in general conformance with the described procedures. Compliance with any other standards referenced within the specified standard is neither inferred nor implied. C.7 SAMPLE STORAGE Unless notified to do otherwise, we routinely retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a period of 30 days. 01REP052C (7/11) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. BORING LOG NOTES DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS TEST SYMBOLS Symbol Definition Symbol Definition AR: Sample of material obtained from cuttings blown out the top of the borehole during air rotary procedure. B, H, N: Size of flush-joint casing CAS: Pipe casing, number indicates nominal diameter in inches COT: Clean-out tube DC: Drive casing; number indicates diameter in inches DM: Drilling mud or bentonite slurry DR: Driller (initials) DS: Disturbed sample from auger flights DP: Direct push drilling; a 2.125 inch OD outer casing with an inner 1½ inch ID plastic tube is driven continuously into the ground. FA: Flight auger; number indicates outside diameter in inches HA: Hand auger; number indicates outside diameter HSA: Hollow stem auger; number indicates inside diameter in inches LG: Field logger (initials) MC: Column used to describe moisture condition of samples and for the ground water level symbols N (BPF): Standard penetration resistance (N-value) in blows per foot (see notes) NQ: NQ wireline core barrel PQ: PQ wireline core barrel RDA: Rotary drilling with compressed air and roller or drag bit. RDF: Rotary drilling with drilling fluid and roller or drag bit REC: In split-spoon (see notes), direct push and thin-walled tube sampling, the recovered length (in inches) of sample. In rock coring, the length of core recovered (expressed as percent of the total core run). Zero indicates no sample recovered. SS: Standard split-spoon sampler (steel; 1.5" is inside diameter; 2" outside diameter); unless indicated otherwise SU Spin-up sample from hollow stem auger TW: Thin-walled tube; number indicates inside diameter in inches WASH: Sample of material obtained by screening returning rotary drilling fluid or by which has collected inside the borehole after “falling” through drilling fluid WH: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod and hammer WR: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod 94mm: 94 millimeter wireline core barrel ▼: Water level directly measured in boring : Estimated water level based solely on sample appearance CONS: One-dimensional consolidation test DEN: Dry density, pcf DST: Direct shear test E: Pressuremeter Modulus, tsf HYD: Hydrometer analysis LL: Liquid Limit, % LP: Pressuremeter Limit Pressure, tsf OC: Organic Content, % PERM: Coefficient of permeability (K) test; F - Field; L - Laboratory PL: Plastic Limit, % qp: Pocket Penetrometer strength, tsf (approximate) qc: Static cone bearing pressure, tsf qu: Unconfined compressive strength, psf R: Electrical Resistivity, ohm-cms RQD: Rock Quality Designation of Rock Core, in percent (aggregate length of core pieces 4" or more in length as a percent of total core run) SA: Sieve analysis TRX: Triaxial compression test VSR: Vane shear strength, remolded (field), psf VSU: Vane shear strength, undisturbed (field), psf WC: Water content, as percent of dry weight %-200: Percent of material finer than #200 sieve STANDARD PENETRATION TEST NOTES (Calibrated Hammer Weight) The standard penetration test consists of driving a split-spoon sampler with a drop hammer (calibrated weight varies to provide N60 values) and counting the number of blows applied in each of three 6" increments of penetration. If the sampler is driven less than 18" (usually in highly resistant material), permitted in ASTM: D1586, the blows for each complete 6" increment and for each partial increment is on the boring log. For partial increments, the number of blows is shown to the nearest 0.1' below the slash. The length of sample recovered, as shown on the “REC” column, may be greater than the distance indicated in the N column. The disparity is because the N-value is recorded below the initial 6" set (unless partial penetration defined in ASTM: D1586 is encountered) whereas the length of sample recovered is for the entire sampler drive (which may even extend more than 18"). Vane Shear Test Washed Sample (Collected during plug drilling) Augered Plug Drilled Split Tube Sample (SPT N60 2 in. spilt tube with liners) Thin Wall Sample (3 in. Shelby Tube) Core Drilled (NV Core Barrel unless otherwise noted) Continuous Soil Sample Augered & Jetted Jetted Augered & Plug Drilled WS PD CS A/J Jet A/P Index Sheet No. 3.0 March 2003 G:\geotech\Public\Forms\INDEX30.doc Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Boring Log Descriptive Terminology (English Units) USER NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS -Additional information available in Geotechnical Manual. This boring was made by ordinary and conventional methods and with care deemed adequate for the Department's design purposes. Since this boring was not taken to gather information relating to the construction of the project, the data noted in the field and recorded may not necessarily be the same as that which a contractor would desire. While the Department believes that the information as to the conditions and materials reported is accurate, it does not warrant that the information is necessarily complete. This information has been edited or abridged and may not reveal all the information which might be useful or of interest to the contractor. Consequently, the Department will make available at its offices, the field logs relating to this boring. Since subsurface conditions outside each borehole are unknown, and soil, rock and water conditions cannot be relied upon to be consistent or uniform, no warrant is made that conditions adjacent to this boring will necessarily be the same as or similar to those shown on this log. Furthermore, the Department will not be responsible for any interpretations, assumptions, projections or interpolations made by contractors, or other users of this log. Water levels recorded on this log should be used with discretion since the use of drilling fluids in borings may seriously distort the true field conditions. Also, water levels in cohesive soils often take extended periods of time to reach equilibrium and thus reflect their true field level. Water levels can be expected to vary both seasonally and yearly. The absence of notations on this log regarding water does not necessarily mean that this boring was dry or that the contractor will not encounter subsurface water during the course of construction. WATER MEASUREMENT AB .........................After Bailing AC .........................After Completion AF .........................After Flushing w/C .......................with Casing w/M.......................with Mud WSD......................While Sampling/Drilling w/AUG ..................with Hollow Stem Auger MISCELLANEOUS NA .........................Not Applicable w/..........................with w/o........................with out sat.........................saturated DRILLING OPERATIONS AUG ..................Augered CD .....................Core Drilled DBD...................Disturbed by Drilling DBJ ...................Disturbed by Jetting PD.....................Plug Drilled ST......................Split Tube (SPT test) TW .....................Thinwall (Shelby Tube) WS ....................Wash Sample NSR...................No Sample Retrieved WH ....................Weight of Hammer WR ....................Weight of Rod Mud...................Drilling Fluids in Sample CS .....................Continuous Sample SOIL/CORE TESTS SPT N60 ..............ASTM D1586 Modified Blows per foot with 140 lb. hammer and a standard energy of 210 ft-lbs. This energy represents 60% of the potential energy of the system and is the average energy provided by a Rope & Cathead system. MC ....................Moisture Content COH ..................Cohesion ?........................Sample Density LL......................Liquid Limit PI ......................Plasticity Index F .......................Phi Angle REC...................Percent Core Recovered RQD ..................Rock Quality Description (Percent of total core interval consisting of unbroken pieces 4 inches or longer) ACL ...................Average Core Length (Average length of core that is greater than 4 inches long) Core Breaks .....Number of natural core breaks per 2-foot interval. DISCONTINUITY SPACING Fractures Distance Bedding Very Close .........<2 inches.............Very Thin Close .................2-12 inches..........Thin Mod. Close........12-36 inches........Medium Wide..................>36 inches...........Thick DRILLING SYMBOLS RELATIVE DENSITY Compactness - Granular Soils BPF very loose ....................................0-4 loose ...........................................5-10 medium dense ............................11-24 dense ..........................................25-50 very dense...................................>50 Consistency - Cohesive Soils BPF very soft.......................................0-1 soft..............................................2-4 firm..............................................5-8 stiff..............................................9-15 very stiff.......................................16-30 hard.............................................31-60 very hard .....................................> 60 COLOR blk...................Black wht............White grn ..................Green brn ............Brown orng ................Orange yel .............Yellow dk ....................Dark lt................Light IOS..................Iron Oxide Stained GRAIN SIZE /PLASTICITY VF .............Very Fine pl.............Plastic F................Fine slpl..........Slightly Cr ..............Coarse Plastic SOIL/ROCK TERMS C ...............Clay Lmst........Limestone L................Loam Sst ..........Sandstone S ...............Sand Dolo ........Dolostone Si ..............Silt wx...........weathered G ...............Gravel (No. 10 Sieve to 3 inches) Bldr ...........Boulder (over 3 inches) T................till (unsorted, nonstratified glacial deposits) Mn/DOT Triangular Textural Soil Classification System 100% 100% C 908070605040302010 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 (plastic) (slightly plastic) SC SCL CL LSL Si SiC SiCL LS S Si 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 100 % % Sand % Clay % A-7 A-7-5 A-7-6 Sieve Analysis, Percent passing: No. 10 (2.00 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .50 max.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . No. 40 (0.425 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 max.50 max.51 min.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . No. 200 (0.075 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 max.25 max.10 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.35 max.36 min.36 min.36 min.36 min. Characteristics of Fraction Passing No. 40 (0.425 mm) Liquid limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min.40 max.41 min. Plasticity index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .N.P.10 max.10 max.11 min.11 min.10 max.10 max.11 min.11 min. General Ratings as Subgrade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Definitions of Gravel, Sand and Silt-Clay 01CLS022 (07/11)AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. The term "silty" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 10 or less and the term "clayey" is applied to fine material having plasticity index of 11 or greater. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures GRAVEL - Material passing sieve with 3-in. square openings and retained on the No. 10 sieve. COARSE SAND - Material passing the No. 10 sieve and retained on the No. 40 sieve. FINE SAND - Material passing the No. 40 sieve and retained on the No. 200 sieve. COMBINED SILT AND CLAY - Material passing the No. 200 sieve Excellent to Good Group A-8 soils are organic clays or peat with organic content >5%. BOULDERS (retained on 3-in. sieve) should be excluded from the portion of the sample to which the classificaiton is applied, but the percentage of such material, if any, in the sample should be recorded. (35% or less passing No. 200 sieve)(More than 35% passing No. 200 sieve) General Classification A-4 A-5 The terms "gravel", "coarse sand", "fine sand" and "silt-clay", as determinable from the minimum test data required in this classification arrangement and as used in subsequent word descriptions are defined as follows: Granular Materials Silt-Clay Materials A-1 A-2 A-2-6 A-2-7 . . . . 6 max. Fine Sand Silty or Clayey Gravel and Sand Silty Soils Clayey Soils Plasticity index of A-7-5 subgroup is equal to or less than LL minus 30. Plasticity index of A-7-6 subgroup is greater than LL minus 30. A-3 A-2-4 A-2-5 Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand Fair to Poor A-6 The placing of A-3 before A-2 is necessary in the "left to right elimination process" and does not indicate superiority of A-3 over A-2. Usual Types of Significant Constituent Materials A-1-a A-1-b Group Classification -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 15 35 0 2 4 6 8 1012 1416 18 203040 506070 80 1020304050607080100140180 LIQUID LIMIT PLAS TI CI T Y I N D E X PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVEPARTIAL GROUP INDEXGROUP INDEX CHART Group Index (GI) = (F-35) [0.2+0.005 (LL-40) ] + 0.01 (F-15) (PI-10) where F = % Passing No. 200 sieve, LL = Liquid Limit, and PI = Plasticity Index. When working with A-2-6 and A-2-7 subgroups the Partial Group Index (PGI) is determined from the PI only. When the combined Partial Group Indices are negative, the Group Index should be reported as zero.A-2-6 and A-2-782% Passing No. 200 sieve LL = 38 PI = 21 PGI = 8.9 for LL PGI = 7.4 for PI GI = 16 Then:Example: 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Sub- G r o u p A-7-5 Sub-G roupA-7 -6 A-7A-5 A-4 A-6 PI = LL - 30PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) Liquid Limit and Plasticity Index Ranges for the A-4, A-5, A-6 and A-7 SubgroupsLiquid Limit 7 17 18 21 19 3.5" Bituminous pavement 11.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) A MIXTURE OF LOAM AND PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen to 3.5', A-6, fill LOAM, grayish brown, moist, A-6, till or fill LOAM, brown, a little dark brown, moist, laminations of loamy sand, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.3 5.0 7.5 10.0 B-1 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Lake Lucy Road Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/3/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.548697 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.884014 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 17 18 18 19 4.25" Bituminous pavement 10.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b (possible aggregate base) LOAM, a little plastic sandy loam, dark brown and brown, frozen to 3.5', A-6, fill LOAM, brown, moist, A-6, till SLIGHTLY PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, wet, A-2-4, alluvium Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.3 5.0 7.5 10.0 B-2 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Lake Lucy Road Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/3/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.545740 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.883779 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 18.2 8 20 20 18 21 4" Bituminous pavement 12" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, a little plastic sandy loam, dark brown, gray and brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.3 10.0 B-3 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Nez Perce Drive Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/3/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.544328 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.884246 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 17 20 25 24 4.5" Bituminous pavement 12.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, gray and brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.4 5.0 10.0 B-4 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Vineland Court Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/3/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.542979 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.884727 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 17 16 17 21 6.25" Bituminous pavement 9.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, a little loam, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, wet, A-6, till or fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.5 1.3 2.5 7.5 10.0 B-5 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Nez Perce Drive Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/3/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.544355 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.885495 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 19.9 6 28 21 20 19 4.25" Bituminous pavement 10.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) SILTY CLAY LOAM, gray, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little gray, frozen to 3' then moist, laminations of loamy sand, A-6, till or fill LOAM, brown, a little gray, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.2 2.5 5.0 10.0 B-6 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Troendle Circle Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/3/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.545553 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.884766 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 18 14 17 19 6.5" Bituminous pavement 6.5" MIXTURE OF CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE AND LOAMY SAND, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen to 3' then damp, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little grayish brown, moist, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.5 1.1 5.0 10.0 B-7 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Redwing Lane Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/31/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.546190 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.879010 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 18 17 18 18 4" Bituminous pavement 12.75" MIXTURE OF CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE AND LOAMY SAND, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, till or fill LOAM, brown, moist, A-6, till LOAM, brown, a little grayish brown, moist, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.4 5.0 7.5 10.0 B-8 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Redwing Lane Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/31/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.547470 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.880720 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 9.9 7 16 19 19 26 4.75" Bituminous pavement 6" MIXTURE OF CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE AND LOAMY SAND, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, a little gray, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little gray and dark brown, moist, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 0.9 5.0 10.0 B-9 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Penamint Lane Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/31/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.545460 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.880662 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 17 17 19 21 4.5" Bituminous pavement 14" MIXTURE OF CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE AND LOAMY SAND, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, a little dark brown, frozen to 3.5' then moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, moist, A-6, till or fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.5 5.0 10.0 B-10 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Penamint Court Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/31/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.544979 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.879751 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 14.7 6 18 20 19 18 4.25" Bituminous pavement 15.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, gray, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, till or fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.6 2.5 10.0 B-11 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Near Mountain Blvd. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.523611 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.888049 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 12.8 5 18 17 19 21 5.25" Bituminous pavement 8.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, a little plastic sandy loam, brown and dark brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, wet, A-6, till or fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.1 7.5 10.0 B-12 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Castle Ridge Court Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.522545 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.888236 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 20 21 19 19 4.5" Bituminous pavement 8" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown and grayish brown, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little light gray, moist, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till LOAM, brown, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.0 2.5 5.0 10.0 B-13 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Cascade Pass Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.524109 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889442 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 5 16 16 17 16 4.25" Bituminous pavement 8.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) A MIXTURE OF LOAM AND PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen to 2.5' then moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little light gray and dark brown, moist, laminations of loamy sand, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.0 7.5 10.0 B-14 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Cascade Pass Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.524910 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.890489 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 8 20 15 16 20 4" Bituminous pavement 10" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, a little plastic sandy loam, brown, frozen to 2.5' then damp, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little light brown, moist, laminations of silty loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.2 7.5 10.0 B-15 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Cascade Pass Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.523784 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.890968 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 19.9 6 8 12 16 19 4.5" Bituminous pavement 15.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) SLIGHTLY PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, a little plastic sandy loam, brown, frozen to 3.5' then damp, A-2-4, fill LOAM, brown, moist to wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.7 5.0 10.0 B-16 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Cascade Circle Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.522585 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.891004 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 18 21 15 21 5" Bituminous pavement 14.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) A MIXTURE OF LOAM AND PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown and light brown, frozen, A-2-6, fill LOAM, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, till or fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, damp, A-6, till or fill LOAM, brown, wet, A-6 till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.6 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 B-17 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Shasta Circle West Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.522759 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.890095 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 10 9 11 14 3.5" Bituminous pavement 9.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAMY SAND, a little plastic sandy loam, brown, frozen to 3' then damp, A-2-4, fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.1 10.0 B-18 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Shasta Circle East Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.522009 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.890242 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 8 19 15 14 17 4.25" Bituminous pavement 12.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen to 2.5', A-6, fill LOAM, a little loamy sand, brown, moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little gray and dark brown, moist, laminations of loamy sand and silty loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.4 2.5 7.5 10.0 B-19 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Castle Ridge Road Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.522402 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889234 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 9 27 18 23 24 5.75" Bituminous pavement 7.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, gray, frozen, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, gray and dark brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, fill LOAM, gray, wet, A-6, till PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brownish gray, wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.5 1.1 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 B-20 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Near Mountain Blvd. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/4/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.525001 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.888260 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 16 16 17 18 3.5" Bituminous pavement 17" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen to moist, A-6, till, possible fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.7 2.5 10.0 B-21 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Near Mountain Blvd. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.526235 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889324 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 5 23 19 19 18 5" Bituminous pavement 10.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, moist, A-6, till or fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.5 2.5 10.0 B-22 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Near Mountain Blvd. Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.527178 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.890364 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 17.1 9 18 19 21 4.25" Bituminous pavement 19.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, gray, moist, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, moist to wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 2.0 5.0 10.0 B-23 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Trappers Pass Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.528191 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889948 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 24 20 20 21 4.5" Bituminous pavement 7.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, gray to brown, frozen to 3' to moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.0 5.0 10.0 B-24 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Mountain Way Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/6/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.527112 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.888199 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 20 18 16 16 4.25" Bituminous pavement 7.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown to gray, frozen to 2.5' to moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.0 10.0 B-25 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.528712 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889041 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 23.4 5 25 22 22 20 4.5" Bituminous pavement 10.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, trace roots, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.3 5.0 10.0 B-26 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.528992 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.888041 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 22 17 21 22 4.5" Bituminous pavement 10.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.3 5.0 10.0 B-27 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.530289 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.887342 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 18 22 22 31 4.75" Bituminous pavement 8.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, gray, frozen, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, gray, wet, A-6, fill LOAM, gray, wet, A-6, til Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.1 2.5 7.5 10.0 B-28 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.531840 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.887817 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 11.3 8 26 22 23 22 6.5" Bituminous pavement 12.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, gray to brown, frozen to 3' then wet, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.5 1.6 5.0 10.0 B-29 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Trappers Pass Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.530520 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889881 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 23 19 20 18 3.5" Bituminous pavement 10.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, gray, frozen to moist, A-6, fill LOAM, gray, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.2 5.0 10.0 B-30 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Trap Line Circle Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.530556 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889337 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 20 20 19 21 4" Bituminous pavement 8" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, gray, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, brown to gray, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.0 2.5 10.0 B-31 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Trap Line Lane Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.532104 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889996 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 24.9 9 29 21 19 19 5.5" Bituminous pavement 10" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, a little loamy sand, dark gray, a little brown, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.5 1.3 2.5 10.0 B-32 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Trappers Pass Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.531231 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889372 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 24 19 25 21 4" Bituminous pavement 13" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, gray, frozen to 2' then moist, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, moist to wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.4 2.5 10.0 B-33 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Trappers Pass Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/5/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.531906 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.888674 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 8 17 17 17 16 4" Bituminous pavement 10" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.2 2.5 10.0 B-34 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/6/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.532861 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.887922 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 11 17 15 15 3.75" Bituminous pavement 9.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) MIXTURE OF LOAMY SAND AND PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen, A-2-4, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.1 2.5 10.0 B-35 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/6/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.535878 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.887878 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 11 11 11 13 3.5" Bituminous pavement 13" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) SLIGHTLY PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen to 3' then moist, A-2-4, fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.4 10.0 B-36 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/6/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.536828 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889295 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 6 19 18 20 18 3.5" Bituminous pavement 11.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, a little gray, frozen to moist, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, gray, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.3 5.0 10.0 B-37 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Summit Circle Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/6/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.535749 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.888964 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 23.6 7 19 18 17 17 3.75" Bituminous pavement 12.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) MIXTURE OF PLASTIC SANDY LOAM AND LOAMY SAND, brown, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, frozen to 3.5' to moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.4 2.5 10.0 B-38 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/6/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.534816 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.889609 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 7 12 8 24 20 3.75" Bituminous pavement 15.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) MIXTURE OF LOAMY SAND AND PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, frozen, A-2-6, fill GRAVELLY LOAMY SAND, brown, frozen to 3.5' to moist, A-1-b, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, a little loamy sand, brown, wet, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, brown, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.5 2.5 6.5 7.5 10.0 B-39 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Oxbow Bend Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 2/6/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.534166 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.888068 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 24.7 5 22 17 23 23 3.5" Bituminous pavement 13.75" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) SILTY CLAY LOAM, dark brown, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, a little plastic sandy loam, brown, dark brown and gray, damp, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little gray, wet, A-6, till or fill LOAM, brown, a little light grayish brown, wet, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.4 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 B-40 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Hidden Court Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.526785 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.858599 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 5 16 16 15 18 3.5" Bituminous pavement 13" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen, A-6, fill MIXTURE OF PLASTIC SANDY LOAM AND LOAM, brown, damp, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, damp, A-6, till or fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.4 2.5 5.0 10.0 B-41 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Hidden Court Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.526645 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.856879 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 19.2 5 16 17 21 20 3.5" Bituminous pavement 12" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen to 17" then moist, brown, A-6, fill LOAM, brown, a little dark brown, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.3 5.0 10.0 B-42 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Hidden Lane Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.528034 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.857681 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 8 21 21 19 20 5" Bituminous pavement 8" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen, A-6, fill LOAM, a little gravel, brown, moist, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.1 2.5 10.0 B-43 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Marsh Drive Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.530114 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.857335 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 4 20 19 20 20 3.75" Bituminous pavement 10.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen to 2.5' then damp, A-6, till or fill LOAM, grayish brown, a little dark brown, moist, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.2 7.5 10.0 B-44 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Marsh Drive Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.529205 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.856223 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 19.1 6 27 22 27 22 4.75" Bituminous pavement 8.25" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) SILTY CLAY LOAM, brown, frozen, A-6, till or fill LOAM, brown to grayish brown, a little dark brown, wet, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till LOAM, grayish brown, a little dark brown, wet, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.1 2.5 7.5 10.0 B-45 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Sinnen Circle Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.529100 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.855300 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 4 18 20 21 22 3.5" Bituminous pavement 9.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen to 2.5' then moist, A-6, till or fill LOAM, grayish brown to brown, a little dark brown, moist, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.3 1.1 5.0 10.0 B-46 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Marsh Drive Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.527817 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.854899 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 20 21 22 22 4.5" Bituminous pavement 11.5" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, brown, frozen to 2.5' then moist, A-6, till or fill LOAM, brown, a little dark brown, moist, laminations of silt loam, A-6, till Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.3 7.5 10.0 B-47 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Dakota Lane Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.528646 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.854445 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code 4 20 19 17 26 4.25" Bituminous pavement 12" CRUSHED LIMESTONE BASE, light brown, frozen, A-1-b, fill (possible aggregate base) LOAM, a little plastic sandy loam, brown, gray and dark brown, frozen to 2.5' then damp, A-6, fill PLASTIC SANDY LOAM, gray, wet, A-2-6, till or fill Bottom of Hole - 10' Groundwater not observed while drilling. 0.4 1.4 7.5 10.0 B-48 2020 Pavement Improvements Ground Elevation (Surveyed)Dakota Lane Trunk Highway/Location Boring No. CP20-05 State Project Bridge No. or Job Desc. Drill Machine 1 1/30/20(ft.) Location Hammer SHEET 1 of 1 CME Automatic Calibrated Completed Drilling Longitude (West)=-93.526550 Co. Coordinate: X= Y= , , ft. LT Latitude (North)=44.854800 UNIQUE NUMBER Depth COH Soil Class: Rock Class: Edit: Date: 2/26/20 Breaks Or Remarks Elev. AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. - Mn/DOT TEMPLATE SUBSURFACE BORING LOG (%)(ft) (pcf)N SPT Lithology(%) U.S. Customary Units Other Tests 5 10 X:\01-GEO\01-GEO FOLDERS\GINTW\1 GINT PROJECTS\28-20267 MNDOT.GPJRockDEPTH(psf) MC (%) Classification or Member 60 FormationREC ACL SoilDrillingOperationRQD Core Index Sheet Code % Passing No. 200 = 16.7 Particle Size Distribution 65No.4 (4.75mm)49No.10 (2.0mm)39No.20 (850µm) 853/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)92½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 18.2No.200 (75µm) 33No.40 (425µm)24No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S1Sample ID 2/3/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Lake Lucy Rd.General Location Depth: 4.5" - 15"Location B-2Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S1Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S1 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 55No.4 (4.75mm)43No.10 (2.0mm)37No.20 (850µm) 693/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)82½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 19.9No.200 (75µm) 32No.40 (425µm)24No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S2Sample ID 2/3/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Nez Perce Dr.General Location Depth: 6" - 15.5"Location B-5Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S2Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S2 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 47No.4 (4.75mm)32No.10 (2.0mm)24No.20 (850µm) 803/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)90½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 9.9No.200 (75µm) 19No.40 (425µm)13No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-aMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S3Sample ID 1/31/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Redwing Ln.General Location Depth: 3.75" - 16.75"Location B-8Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S3Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S3 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 63No.4 (4.75mm)44No.10 (2.0mm)35No.20 (850µm) 903/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)97½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 14.7No.200 (75µm) 28No.40 (425µm)19No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-aMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S4Sample ID 1/31/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Penamint Ct.General Location Depth: 4.5" - 18.5"Location B-10Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S4Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S4 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 59No.4 (4.75mm)43No.10 (2.0mm)34No.20 (850µm) 793/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)89½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 12.8No.200 (75µm) 27No.40 (425µm)17No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-aMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S5Sample ID 2/4/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Near Mountain Blvd.General Location Depth: 4" - 19.5"Location B-11Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S5Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S5 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 62No.4 (4.75mm)46No.10 (2.0mm)38No.20 (850µm) 823/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)87½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 19.9No.200 (75µm) 33No.40 (425µm)24No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S6Sample ID 2/4/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Cascade PassGeneral Location Depth: 4.5" - 14"Location B-15Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S6Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S6 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 64No.4 (4.75mm)47No.10 (2.0mm)37No.20 (850µm) 813/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)91½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 17.1No.200 (75µm) 31No.40 (425µm)22No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S7Sample ID 2/5/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Near Mountain Blvd.General Location Depth: 4.5" - 17.5"Location B-22Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S7Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S7 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 77No.4 (4.75mm)59No.10 (2.0mm)48No.20 (850µm) 923/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)99½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 23.4No.200 (75µm) 42No.40 (425µm)30No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S8Sample ID 2/5/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Oxbow BendGeneral Location Depth: 4" - 12"Location B-25Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S8Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S8 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 48No.4 (4.75mm)36No.10 (2.0mm)29No.20 (850µm) 753/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)88½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 11.3No.200 (75µm) 24No.40 (425µm)16No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-aMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S9Sample ID 2/5/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Oxbow BendGeneral Location Depth: 4" - 13"Location B-28Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S9Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S9 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 76No.4 (4.75mm)59No.10 (2.0mm)49No.20 (850µm) 953/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)98½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 24.9No.200 (75µm) 43No.40 (425µm)31No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S10Sample ID 2/5/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Trap Line Ln.General Location Depth: 4" - 12"Location B-31Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S10Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S10 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 75No.4 (4.75mm)58No.10 (2.0mm)47No.20 (850µm) 933/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)96½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 23.6No.200 (75µm) 40No.40 (425µm)30No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S11Sample ID 2/6/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Summit Cir.General Location Depth: 4" - 15"Location B-37Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S11Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S11 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 69No.4 (4.75mm)54No.10 (2.0mm)44No.20 (850µm) 863/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)91½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 24.7No.200 (75µm) 39No.40 (425µm)31No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S12Sample ID 2/6/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Oxbow BendGeneral Location Depth: 3.5" - 18.5"Location B-39Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S12Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S12 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 65No.4 (4.75mm)47No.10 (2.0mm)37No.20 (850µm) 883/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)95½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 19.2No.200 (75µm) 31No.40 (425µm)24No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S13Sample ID 1/30/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Hidden Ct.General Location Depth: 3" - 16.5"Location B-41Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S13Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S13 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 66No.4 (4.75mm)50No.10 (2.0mm)41No.20 (850µm) 923/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)98½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 19.1No.200 (75µm) 35No.40 (425µm)25No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S14Sample ID 1/30/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Marsh Dr.General Location Depth: 4" - 14"Location B-44Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S14Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S14 N/AComments Particle Size Distribution 58No.4 (4.75mm)43No.10 (2.0mm)36No.20 (850µm) 823/8in (9.5mm) 100¾in (19.0mm)95½in (12.5mm) % PassingSieve Size Method:AASHTO T 27, AASHTO T 11 Limits 16.7No.200 (75µm) 31No.40 (425µm)22No.100 (150µm) Date Tested:2/13/2020 On-siteSourceGravelly slightly plastic sandy loam (crushed limestone); A-1-bMaterial Sample Details 20-01734-S15Sample ID 1/30/2020Date Sampled GradationSpecificationSampled By American Engineering TestingSampling Method Dakota Ln.General Location Depth: 4.5" - 16.25"Location B-48Field Sample ID 2/11/2020Date Submitted ResultOther Test Results MethodDescription Limits Tested By:Vincent Lubbers American Engineering Testing, Inc.St. Paul Albertville550 Cleveland Ave N 5548 Barthel Ind Dr, Ste 500St. Paul, MN 55114 Albertville, MN 55301(651) 659-9001 (763) 428-5573Toll Free: (800) 972-6364 www.amengtest.comReport No: MAT:20-01734-S15Issue No: 1 Project:2020 Pavement Improvements; CP 20-05 Client:This document shall not bereproduced, except in full,without written approvalfrom American EngineeringTesting, Inc. Reviewed By: 2/14/2020Date of Issue: CC: Krystle Staker CHANHASSEN, CITY OF Chanhassen MNJob No:28-20267 Material Test Report Page 1 of 1© 2000-2018 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.comForm No: 18909, Report No: MAT:20-01734-S15 N/AComments Segment ID Area Road Start End Average Bituminous Thickness (in.) Average Base Thickness (in.) Average Bituminous Core Thickness (in.) Average Base Thickness (in.)Base Material Subgrade Material Longitudinal Transverse Fatigue Cracking Block Cracking Delamination Weathering Skin Patches Fog Seal Patches Crack Sealant Recommended Rehabilitation Method GE Approximate Length (ft.) 1 Lake Lucy Rd Powers Blvd Nez Perce Dr 3.9 11.4 3.7 10.75 Crushed Limestone Base A-6, A-2-4 high medium X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 1390 2 Nez Perce Dr Lake Lucy Rd End 4.9 12 5.2 10.75 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X 12" FDR†, 4" Bit 17 1270 3 Vineland Ct Nez Perce Dr Cul-de-sac 5.1 11 4.4 12 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 475 4 Troendle Cir Nez Perce Dr Cul-de-sac 4.3 10.2 4 11 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 500 5 Red Wing Lane Carver Beach Rd Kerber Blvd 4.5 10.7 4.6 9.5 Mixture of Crushed Limestone Base and Silty Sand A-6 high high X X X X X X 12" FDR†, 4" Bit 17 1300 6 Penamint Ln Carver Beach Rd Red Wing Lane 4.6 7.9 4.3 6 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X 8" FDR, 4" Bit 13 730 7 Penamint Ct Penamint Ln Cul-de-sac 4.5 12.3 4.4 14 Mixture of Crushed Limestone Base and Silty Sand A-6 low high X X X X X 2.5" M&O 560 8 Near Mountain Blvd Pleasantview Rd ~500' N of Trappers Pass 4.8 10.6 4.9 13 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 medium to high medium X X X X X X 12" FDR†, 4" Bit 17 1960 9 Castle Ridge Near Mountain Blvd Vine Hill Rd 4.2 10.2 4.3 12 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high low to medium X X X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 1420 10 Cascade Pass Castle Ridge S Castle Ridge N 4.3 9.1 4.1 8.8 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high low X X X X X 10" FDR, 4" Bit 15 1280 11 Cascade Ct Cascade Pass Cul-de-sac 4.7 10.1 4.3 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**medium medium X X X X X X 2" M&O 190 12 Cascade Cir Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 4.7 13.2 5.6 19.75 Crushed Limestone Base A-2-4, A-6 medium medium X X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 420 13 Shasta Cir E Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 4.3 9.4 4.6 8.5 Crushed Limestone Base A-2-4 high high X X X X X X 10" FDR, 4" Bit 15 260 14 Shasta Cir W Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 4.8 9.7 4.75 15 Crushed Limestone Base A-2-6, A-6 high high X X X X X X 12" FDR†, 4" Bit 17 240 15 Olympic Cir Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 4.8 5.3 5.7 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**high high X X X X X 8" FDR, 4" Bit 240 16 Castle Ridge Ct Castle Ridge S Cul-de-sac 5.2 9.2 4.7 9.5 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high medium X X X X X X 10" FDR, 4" Bit 15 680 17 Mountain Way Near Mountain Blvd Oxbow Bend 4.3 9.8 3.9 8.5 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X X X 10" FDR, 4" Bit 15 800 18 Mountain View Ct Near Mountain Blvd Cul-de-sac 4.9 8.6 5.4 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**low high X X X X X X 2.5" M&O 200 19 Oxbow Bend Trappers Pass Oxbow Bend 4.0 9.7 4.1 10.7 Crushed Limestone Base A-2-4, A-2-6, A-1-b, A-6 high high X X X X X X 10" FDR, 4" Bit 15 4390 20 Rojina Ln Oxbow Bend Cul-de-sac 4.3 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**2" M&O 115 21 Summit Cir Oxbow Bend Cul-de-sac 4.7 11 4.2 11 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 625 22 Trappers Pass Oxbow Bend (S)Near Mountain Blvd 4.9 9.9 4.3 14.2 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 625 23 Piedmont Ct Near Mountain Blvd Cul-de-sac 5.0 9.0 3.4 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**medium X X X X X X 10" FDR, 4" Bit 150 24 Stag Horn Ln Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 4.6 8.3 5.5 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**high high X X X X X 2" M&O 170 25 Trap Line Cir Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 4.5 9.1 4.25 10 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X X 10" FDR, 4" Bit 15 375 26 Trap Line Ln Trappers Pass Cul-de-sac 5.0 9.2 5.2 8 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X 10" FDR, 4" Bit 15 550 27 Hidden Ct Lake Dr E Cul-de-sac 4.4 10.7 3.7 13.5 Crushed Limestone Base, Mixture of Crushed Limestone Base and Silty Sand A-6 high high X X X X X X X 12" FDR†, 4" Bit 17 1125 28 Hidden Ln Marsh Dr Hidden Ct 4.3 10.2 3.7 11 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 high high X X X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 950 29 Hidden Cir Hidden Ln Cul-de-sac 4.7 *3.9 12**Class 5 Gravel (Modified) 100% Crushed**high X X X X X X 2" M&O 260 30 Marsh Drive Lake Dr E Dakota Ln 4.1 10.7 3.9 9.3 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 low high X X X X X X X 12" FDR, 4" Bit 17 1350 31 Sinnen Cir Marsh Dr Cul-de-sac 4.6 10.8 4.8 9 Crushed Limestone Base A-6 low high X X X X X X 2.5" M&O 300 32 Dakota Ln Erie Cir Cul-de-sac 4.2 10.7 3.5 11.75 Crushed Limestone Base A-6, A-2-6 high high X X X X X X X 12" FDR†, 4" Bit 17 1300 *A layer of aggregate base was not discernable in the GPR scan **Soil borings were not performed at these locations. Thickness and material type references the standard City pavement section constructed. See GPR data measurements for additional details. †Review GPR, there are areas that base is thinner and the reclaim depth may need to be adjusted. Maintenance Lake Lucy Road Red Wing Lane Trappers Pass Marsh Drive GPR Results Pavement Coring/Soil Boring Results Surface Condition Notes GPR not collected due to snow coverage Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation 2020 Pavement Improvements; Chanhassen, MN AMERICAN March 11, 2020 ENGINEERING Report No. 28-20267 TESTING, INC. Appendix D Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Appendix D Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. 28-20267 Appendix D - Page 1 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. D.1 REFERENCE This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks relating to subsurface problems which are caused by construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. This information was developed and provided by ASFE1, of which, we are a member firm. D.2 RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION D.2.1 Geotechnical Services are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the Client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one, not even you, should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. D.2.2 Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. D.2.3 A Geotechnical Engineering Report is Based on A Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project-specific factors when establishing the scope of a study. Typically factors include: Clients goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was:  not prepared for you,  not prepared for your project,  not prepared for the specific site explored, or  completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect:  the function of the proposed structure, as when it’s changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse,  elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure,  composition of the design team, or  project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes, even minor ones, and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. D.2.4 Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. 1 ASFE, 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301/565-2733: www.asfe.org Appendix D Geotechnical Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use Report No. 28-20267 Appendix D – Page 2 of 2 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC D.2.5 Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identified subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ, sometimes significantly, from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. D.2.6 A Report’s Recommendations Are Not Final Do not over rely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report’s recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation. D.2.7 A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to Misinterpretation Other design team members’ misinterpretation of geotechnical engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review pertinent elements of the design team’s plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation. D.2.8 Do Not Redraw the Engineer’s Logs Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognizes that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. D.2.9 Give Contractors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In the letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report’s accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. D.2.10 Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some owners, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their report. Sometimes labeled “limitations” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. D.2.11 Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. ####################################"F)³C H ±"F) LakeMinnewashta Lake Lucy LakeAnn Lotus Lake Lake Susan LakeRiley LakeHarrison Rice MarshLake Rice Lake LakeSaintJoe LakeVirginia LakeMinnewashtaRegional Park(County Park) HermanField Park RoundhousePark MinnewashtaHeights Park PheasantHillPark NorthLotusLakePark CarverBeachPark MinnesotaLandscapeArboretum Minnesota Landscape Arboretum ChanhassenNaturePreserve Bluff CreekPreserve BluffCreekPreserve BluffCreekPreserve PioneerPassPark Bluff Creek Golf Course Hesse FarmPreserve Seminary FenScientific and Natural Area(SNA) Raquet WildlifeManagement Area(WMA) Raquet WildlifeManagement Area(WMA) MN Valley NationalWildlife Refuge FoxwoodsPreserve RileyRidgePark BandimerePark Lake SusanPark LakeSusanPreserve LakeAnnPark MeadowGreenPark SouthLotusLakePark PowerHillPark PleasantViewPreserve M innesota RiverK eber P ondChristmasLake BrendanPond ?©A@?©A@?©A@ ?©A@ +¢ +¢ +¢ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ ?«A@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ ?ÌA@ ?ÌA@ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ GoWX GrWX GrWX GrWX GïWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GnWX GnWX GnWX GÇWX GÇWX GÇWX GïWX Year & Pav ement Maintenance Type 2020 - Mill & Overlay 2021 - Mill & Overlay 2022 - Mill & Overlay 2023 - Mill & Overlay 2024 - Mill & Overlay 2022 - Reconstruction 2023 - Reconstruction 2024 - Reconstruction 2020 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) 2021 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) 2022 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) 2023 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) 2024 - Municipal State Aid (MSA) #######2020 - County/State Project #######2021 - County/State Project 5 -Y e a r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t P l a nPavement M a n a g e m e n t Date Created: 11/13/2019 Document Path: K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\StreetCIP_2019\5YearCIP.mxd Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department µ0 4,000Feet 0 0.5Mile Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley 2020 2024thru Department Street Improvements Description Annual project to rehabilitate and reconstruct streets in the City. The following streets are scheduled to be completed in 2020, future areas will be determined by available funds and condition of the streets. 2020 Minnewashta Parkway (MSA, 2020 & 2021) and Lake Lucy-TH41 to Galpin Blvd (MSA) Krvers Point, Willow View, Twin Maple and Basswood Stone Creek Drive, Boulder Road, Stone Creek Ct, Stone Creek Ln, etc. Hidden Lane, Hidden Circle, Hidden Court, Marsh Drive, Sinnen Circle and Dakota Lane Lake Lucy, Nez Perce, Vineland Court and Troendle Circle Brendan Court Project #ST-012 Priority n/a Justification The City uses a Pavement Management System to monitor the condition of the City streets. While proper preventative maintenance extends the life of the street and is cost effective, a street will eventually deteriorate to a point that major maintenance is required. Rehabilitation projects extend the life of the street. In cases when utilities or poor sub grade needs to be replaced or where streets have deteriorated to a point where rehabilitation will no longer be practical, reconstruction of the street is necessary. A feasibility study is written to consider the merits of the project and scope of work. Budget Impact/Other This project may decrease maintenance costs. Useful Life Unassigned Project Name Annual Street Improvement Program Category Streets/Highways Type Improvement Account #2 Account #1 601-xxxx-4751 Total Project Cost:$56,694,000 Account #4 Account #3 Total20202021202220232024Expenditures 30,664,0006,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000Construction 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total Total20202021202220232024FundingSources 17,620,0002,582,500 3,637,500 3,700,000 3,800,000 3,900,000Assessment/Revolving Assess Fund 3,333,0001,716,500 1,516,500 100,000MSA 1,685,000192,500 517,500 325,000 325,000 325,000SewerUtilityFund 2,771,000185,500 785,500 600,000 600,000 600,000SurfaceWaterUtilityFund 5,255,0001,550,000 1,605,000 700,000 700,000 700,000WaterUtilityFund 6,227,000 8,062,000 5,325,000 5,525,000 5,525,000 30,664,000Total Prior 26,030,000 Total 89 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: April 13, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CALLING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2020 STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 20-05 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted January 13, 2020, a report has been prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates with reference to the above-referenced project, and this report is being received by the Council on April 13, 2020, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such project in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting properties for a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the street improvements of $2,375,000. 2. Public hearing for the proposed improvements within the 2020 Street Rehabilitation Project No. 20-05 shall be held on April 27, 2020, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:00 PM. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of April, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Fire Department Update Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: I.1. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No:  ATTACHMENTS: Narrative Report Graphs and Charts TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Don Johnson, Fire Chief DATE: March 23, 2020 SUBJ: Monthly Fire Department Update Fire Department Staffing Department staffing is at 44 of 45 paid on-call firefighters. One firefighter is on personal leave while attending the Saint Paul Fire Academy. Fire Department Response The fire department responded to (75) calls for service in February. Call Breakdown for the month: • 1 Chief Only • 12 Day Only • 28 Duty Crew Only • 34 General Alarms Significant calls for January included the following: • (45) Rescue/EMS calls with (5) motor vehicle accidents. • (7) Fire Responses o (4) Building Fires- Mutual Aid Responses (Minnetonka, Wayzata, Chaska, Victoria) o (2) Chimney Fire o (1) Dumpster Fire Monthly Training • Officer Training – Leadership Training • On – Line Hazardous Materials Training • Several members completed outside training courses o Minnesota State School – Mankato (Ice Rescue Training) • Department Ice Rescue Training – Led by those who attended Todd Gerhardt Fire Department Update Page 2 Other Activities • Staffed a Standby Crew at Minnetonka Fire so they could attend their Annual Awards Banquet • Assist to Mdewakanton Fire for Fireground Incident Command Training and Certification on March 3 and March 4 • Fire Station 1 was utilized for voting on March 3. • New Firefighter Orientation was held on March 16. Probationary FFs were given Mentor Packets and Team Assignments with expectations for the mentoring period. • Multiple planning meetings occurred in preparation for the Westwood Functional Exercise in May. Fire Marshal Council Update for February 2020 • Several meetings took place between city staff (Fire, Planning, Building) and the owners of Hemp Acres, a prospective new tenant for 2100 Stoughton Ave (old Gedney building). We continue to work through assisting them with what they will need to provide to the city and changes needed in the building before the business can move in and start operating. Some of the fire safety items include: updating the building’s fire suppression system, testing of existing fire alarm system, and architectural/ storage plans and fire suppression engineer reports provided to the Fire Marshal. • Design Solutions (1266 Park Rd) and Power Systems (8325 Commerce Dr) both requested meetings to assist with emergency response planning. I performed building walkthroughs and met with staff to assist them in developing an emergency response plan and evacuation procedures. • Performed fire inspections at over 40 businesses at the Stone Creek Business Park off Stone Creek Dr. Fire code violations were called into the Fire Marshal’s office by employees on site which led to all businesses in the park being inspected. • Two additional CPR/AED/Choking classes completed for The Bernard Group. Fire Investigations No fire investigations to report on. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Dec Jan Feb 2019-2020 Calls by Month and Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire 71 50 66 79 86 76 66 72 84 85 85 101 94 88 76 64 71 88 102 85 85 79 84 86 80 75 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Chanhassen Fire Department Calls By Month Comparison 2018 2019 Series8 691 690 753 921 1,002 992 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Projected Calls for Service by Year Rescue & Emergency Medical Service 63% Alarm Calls 10% Good Intent Call 11% Hazardous Condition 4% Service Call 6% Fire 6% 2020 Calls for Service by % of Call Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire "F)³CH ±"F) !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( LakeMinnewashta Lake Lucy LakeAnn Lotus Lake Lake Susan LakeRiley LakeHarrison Rice MarshLake Rice Lake LakeSaintJoe LakeVirginia LakeMinnewashtaRegional Park(County Park) HermanField Park RoundhousePark MinnewashtaHeights Park PheasantHillPark NorthLotusLakePark CarverBeachPark MinnesotaLandscapeArboretum Minnesota Landscape Arboretum ChanhassenNaturePreserve Bluff CreekPreserve BluffCreekPreserve BluffCreekPreserve PioneerPassPark Bluff Creek Golf Course Hesse FarmPreserve Seminary FenScientific and Natural Area(SNA) Raquet WildlifeManagement Area(WMA) Raquet WildlifeManagement Area(WMA) MN Valley NationalWildlife Refuge FoxwoodsPreserve RileyRidgePark BandimerePark Lake SusanPark LakeSusanPreserve LakeAnnPark MeadowGreenPark SouthLotusLakePark PowerHillPark PleasantViewPreserve M innesota R iverK eber P ondChristmasLake BrendanPond ?©A@?©A@?©A@ ?©A@ +¢ +¢ +¢ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ ?«A@ ?«A@ ?ÌA@ ?ÌA@ ?ÌA@ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ GoWX GrWX GrWX GrWX GïWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GnWXGnWXGnWX GÇWX GÇWX GÇWX GïWX ChanhassenRec Center SugarbushPark ManchesterPark CurryFarmsPark Sunset RidgePark Date Created: 3/11/2020 Document Path: K:\WSB\Maps\Fire\FireIncidentMap_February2020.mxd Created By: City of Chanhassen - Fire Department !(Calls For Service - February 2020 ³C H ±City Hall "F)Fire Station Railroad Rivers Lakes Parks Parcel Boundaries Fire Box Alarm Zones North Box South Box West Box City of Chan hassen Fire Calls for Service - February 2020 µ0 4,000Feet 0 0.5Mile CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Law Enforcement Update Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: I.2. Prepared By Lt. Lance Pearce, CCSO File No:  SUMMARY Attached is the monthly law enforcement activity report for March, 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Cover Memo Monthly Breakdown March Report Lieutenant Ghanhassen Oflice Memo TO: Mayor Ryan; Council Members Tjornholm, McDonald, Campion and Coleman FROM: Lieutenant Lance Pearce DATE: April 9, 2020 RE: Law Enforcement Update Attached are the agenda items for the City of Chanhassen council meeting April 13, 2020 for your review and consideration. 1. Carver County Sheriff's Office City of Chanhassen March 2020 Monthly Calls for Service Summary; Group A, Group B, Non-Criminal, Traffic and Administrative. 2. Carver County Sheriff's Office City of Chanhassen March 2020 Arrest Summary. 3. Carver County Sheriffs Office City of Chanhassen March 2020 Citation Summary. 4. Training update: canceled due to pandemic 5. Staffing update Page 1 March 2020 City of Chanhassen Calls for Service March 2020 Types of Calls CFS=724 I Felony I Misdemeanor ? Non Criminal r Traffic March 2020 25 20 15 10 A 5 0 Felony Assault Felony Theft Drug Felony Other I 9 .& ,',Pt* o+o $ud .""" {".-p.""" 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Total Patrol Calls for Service: 724 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Review of Claims Paid 03­23­2020 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: I.3. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on March 23, 2020: Check Numbers Amounts 172720 – 172828 $380,446.78 ACH Payments $313,256.98 Total All Claims $693,703.76 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 3/13/2020 9:12 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount AARP AARP 03/05/2020 0.00 425.00172720 aftonst Afton St. Croix Co 03/05/2020 0.00 152.35172721 bffas B & F Fastener Supply 03/05/2020 0.00 27.84172722 BCATRA BCA 03/05/2020 0.00 45.00172723 BERCOF BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 03/05/2020 0.00 1,081.18172724 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 03/05/2020 0.00 331.51172725 CDWGOV CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 03/05/2020 0.00 9,277.28172726 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 0.00 1,834.67172727 ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 03/05/2020 0.00 4,110.17172728 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 03/05/2020 0.00 151.06172729 CouVet Countryside Veterinary Clinic PLLC 03/05/2020 0.00 193.40172730 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 03/05/2020 0.00 56.71172731 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 03/05/2020 0.00 345.39172732 GREMEA GREEN MEADOWS INC 03/05/2020 0.00 880.00172733 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 03/05/2020 0.00 390.00172734 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 03/05/2020 0.00 23.00172735 NEWSIG NEWMAN SIGNS INC 03/05/2020 0.00 822.37172736 PedTay Taylor Pederson 03/05/2020 0.00 470.00172737 RilPur Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District03/05/2020 0.00 2,000.00172738 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 03/05/2020 0.00 58.50172739 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 03/05/2020 0.00 5,940.91172740 stevtyl Katie & Tyler Stevens 03/05/2020 0.00 1,320.00172741 TFOFIN TFORCE FINAL MILE 03/05/2020 0.00 47.67172742 TOWMAS TOWMASTER INC 03/05/2020 0.00 1,580.00172743 Trouvail Trouvaille LLC 03/05/2020 0.00 10,012.63172744 TWIHAR TWIN CITY HARDWARE 03/05/2020 0.00 1,904.00172745 ULTMAR ULTIMATE MARTIAL ARTS INC.03/05/2020 0.00 129.60172746 VIKELE VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 03/05/2020 0.00 18.42172747 ANAFATT Ana Fatturi 03/12/2020 0.00 725.00172790 APWA AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 03/12/2020 0.00 1,093.75172791 BCATRA BCA 03/12/2020 0.00 30.00172792 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 0.00 7,460.94172793 CenLin CenturyLink 03/12/2020 0.00 64.00172794 CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 03/12/2020 0.00 1,064.30172795 CulBot Culligan Bottled Water 03/12/2020 0.00 28.66172796 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 03/12/2020 0.00 956.48172797 ANAFATT Ana Fatturi 03/12/2020 0.00 40.00172798 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 03/12/2020 0.00 2,249.05172799 HARTLIFE Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company03/12/2020 0.00 1,115.28172800 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/12/2020 0.00 1,408.33172801 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 03/12/2020 0.00 735.00172802 JAGCOM Jaguar Communications Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 53.60172803 JERTRA JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER.03/12/2020 0.00 1,198.14172804 kalChr Chris Kalogerson 03/12/2020 0.00 200.00172805 KERRMATT Matt Kerr 03/12/2020 0.00 960.00172806 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 03/12/2020 0.00 540.13172807 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 03/12/2020 0.00 520.00172808 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (3/13/2020 9:12 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 03/12/2020 0.00 106,310.00172809 LITFAL LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 03/12/2020 0.00 172.20172810 MARTCOLL COLLEEN MARTINO 03/12/2020 0.00 40.72172811 MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 183.96172812 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 03/12/2020 0.00 172,654.49172813 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 03/12/2020 0.00 7,804.43172814 MASS MN ASSOCIATION OF SENIOR SERV 03/12/2020 0.00 149.00172815 MNTRAN MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 03/12/2020 0.00 269.75172816 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 03/12/2020 0.00 96.00172817 MSFCA MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.03/12/2020 0.00 360.00172818 QUAFIR Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 400.00172819 RopDou Doug Roper 03/12/2020 0.00 250.00172820 SABIDEAN DEAN SABINSKE 03/12/2020 0.00 32.16172821 SHIPMELO Melonie Shipman 03/12/2020 0.00 95.00172822 Shred Shred-It 03/12/2020 0.00 145.78172823 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 03/12/2020 0.00 24,125.18172824 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 03/12/2020 0.00 570.95172825 UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 03/12/2020 0.00 1,125.00172826 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 1,184.43172827 ZACKS ZACK'S INC.03/12/2020 0.00 406.41172828 Report Total (67 checks): 380,446.78 0.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (3/13/2020 9:12 AM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 3/13/2020 9:13 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH z-a1secu A1 Security Camera LLC 02/19/2020 0.00 2,006.76 ACH Z-ACT1TA Act 1 Talent 02/19/2020 0.00 4,144.00 ACH z-adobe Adobe 02/19/2020 0.00 643.16 ACH Z-AIRMEC Air Mechanical 02/19/2020 0.00 150.00 ACH Z-ALDI ALDI 02/19/2020 0.00 41.64 ACH Z-AMAZON Amazon 02/19/2020 0.00 9,303.91 ACH Z-AMELEG American Legion 02/19/2020 0.00 962.26 ACH Z-AMEPLA American Planning Association 02/19/2020 0.00 411.00 ACH Z-APPLE Apple.com 02/19/2020 0.00 0.99 ACH z-arcsoc ArchiveSocial 02/19/2020 0.00 2,388.00 ACH Z-ARRRES Arrowwood Resort 02/19/2020 0.00 516.00 ACH Z-CAFTHY Cafe Thyme 02/19/2020 0.00 148.22 ACH Z-CARHAR Carhartt 02/19/2020 0.00 239.98 ACH Z-CHAFLO Chanhassen Floral 02/19/2020 0.00 120.00 ACH z-chavac Chanhassen Vacuum Sales 02/19/2020 0.00 499.00 ACH z-corfee Corporate Card Annual Fee 02/19/2020 0.00 12.00 ACH Z-CUBFOO Cub Foods 02/19/2020 0.00 79.30 ACH z-delta Delta Airlines 02/19/2020 0.00 567.80 ACH Z-DUNGAR Dungarees 02/19/2020 0.00 6.39 ACH Z-EDDBAU Eddie Bauer 02/19/2020 0.00 86.50 ACH z-eijkel Eijkelkamp North American 02/19/2020 0.00 340.64 ACH Z-ENAELE Enabling Elements Inc 02/19/2020 0.00 15.00 ACH Z-EVEBRI Eventbrite 02/19/2020 0.00 225.00 ACH Z-FACBOO Facebook 02/19/2020 0.00 54.05 ACH Z-GALLS Galls LLC 02/19/2020 0.00 527.97 ACH z-grain Grainger 02/19/2020 0.00 124.10 ACH Z-HACCOM Hach Company 02/19/2020 0.00 2,086.79 ACH z-homdep Home Depot 02/19/2020 0.00 812.98 ACH z-hsem Homeland Security and Emergency Management 02/19/2020 0.00 128.11 ACH Z-HOULIH Houlihan's 02/19/2020 0.00 165.96 ACH Z-HYDWOR Hydraulic World 02/19/2020 0.00 347.91 ACH z-JWPEP J.W. Pepper 02/19/2020 0.00 80.00 ACH Z-LUNBYE Lunds & Byerly's 02/19/2020 0.00 91.74 ACH Z-MACYS Macy's 02/19/2020 0.00 273.58 ACH z-mcdona McDonald's 02/19/2020 0.00 171.37 ACH Z-MCMCAR McMaster-Carr 02/19/2020 0.00 96.83 ACH Z-MENARD Menards 02/19/2020 0.00 86.01 ACH z-mercho Merchology 02/19/2020 0.00 128.99 ACH Z-MILNAM Militarynames.com 02/19/2020 0.00 14.00 ACH Z-MILFLE Mills Fleet Farm 02/19/2020 0.00 24.99 ACH Z-MINSTA Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association 02/19/2020 0.00 200.00 ACH Z-MNLABO MN Dept of Labor and Industry 02/19/2020 0.00 20.00 ACH Z-NORCOO NORTH COOP 02/19/2020 0.00 60.45 ACH z-offmax Office Max/Office Depot 02/19/2020 0.00 196.50 ACH z-oldlog Old Log Theater 02/19/2020 0.00 2,280.52 Page 1 of 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-PARCIT Party City 02/19/2020 0.00 46.43 ACH Z-PIZZAI Pizzaioli 02/19/2020 0.00 42.47 ACH z-post Postmaster 02/19/2020 0.00 6.85 ACH z-redtoo Red Tool Store 02/19/2020 0.00 643.18 ACH Z-REDAME Redstone American Grill 02/19/2020 0.00 46.00 ACH Z-ROTCLU Rotary Club 02/19/2020 0.00 53.00 ACH Z-SENLAN Sensible Land Use Coalition 02/19/2020 0.00 250.00 ACH z-shafil ShareFile 02/19/2020 0.00 565.33 ACH z-spectr Spectrum 02/19/2020 0.00 519.66 ACH Z-STATRI Star Tribune 02/19/2020 0.00 453.44 ACH Z-TARGET Target 02/19/2020 0.00 22.80 ACH Z-TAVERN Tavern 4&5 02/19/2020 0.00 50.44 ACH Z-TESSCO Tessco 02/19/2020 0.00 3,859.74 ACH Z-UOFM U of M Contlearning 02/19/2020 0.00 975.00 ACH Z-USABLU USABlueBook 02/19/2020 0.00 256.41 ACH Z-WHETEC Whel-Tech 02/19/2020 0.00 410.78 ACH z-workbo Workboots.com 02/19/2020 0.00 269.91 ACH ACTMIN ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 03/05/2020 0.00 1,742.00 ACH BadSta Badger State Inspection LLC 03/05/2020 0.00 1,600.00 ACH PedrChri Christine Lea Pedretti 03/05/2020 0.00 663.00 ACH CRYINF Crystal Infosystems LLC 03/05/2020 0.00 376.35 ACH DALCO DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 03/05/2020 0.00 78.17 ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 03/05/2020 0.00 174.15 ACH HenPro Henning Professional Services, Inc 03/05/2020 0.00 4,834.98 ACH JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 03/05/2020 0.00 88.38 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 03/05/2020 0.00 15,109.20 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 0.00 18,027.62 ACH LifSup Life Support Innovations LLC 03/05/2020 0.00 534.10 ACH MatTri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 03/05/2020 0.00 521.73 ACH MinEqu Minnesota Equipment 03/05/2020 0.00 22.70 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/05/2020 0.00 6,756.96 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/05/2020 0.00 28.06 ACH NATRES NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC. 03/05/2020 0.00 1,120.00 ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 03/05/2020 0.00 341.34 ACH PRALAW PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 03/05/2020 0.00 165.53 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 03/05/2020 0.00 1,729.00 ACH DAHLTERR TERRY DAHL 03/05/2020 0.00 470.00 ACH ULTCON ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 03/05/2020 0.00 7,045.00 ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 03/05/2020 0.00 379.96 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 03/05/2020 0.00 3,410.17 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 0.00 3,828.03 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 0.00 12,024.25 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 0.00 23,448.10 ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 03/05/2020 0.00 336.93 ACH 3RDLAI 3RD LAIR SKATEPARK 03/12/2020 0.00 500.00 ACH A1ELE A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 03/12/2020 0.00 1,285.76 ACH BENEXT BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 03/12/2020 0.00 86.35 ACH BOLMEN BOLTON & MENK INC 03/12/2020 0.00 3,820.00 ACH CAMBAR CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 03/12/2020 0.00 850.00 ACH carcou Carver County 03/12/2020 0.00 965.00 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 0.00 1,534.03 ACH Choice Choice, Inc. 03/12/2020 0.00 194.70 ACH CRYINF Crystal Infosystems LLC 03/12/2020 0.00 389.92 ACH DAMFAR DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES 03/12/2020 0.00 1,625.20 ACH engwat Engel Water Testing Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 500.00 Page 2 of 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 03/12/2020 0.00 506.82 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 03/12/2020 0.00 12,872.83 ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 03/12/2020 0.00 911.25 ACH HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 03/12/2020 0.00 18.00 ACH IMPPOR IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 03/12/2020 0.00 2,349.75 ACH INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 187.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/12/2020 0.00 329.01 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 03/12/2020 0.00 100.21 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/12/2020 0.00 84,962.55 ACH LYMLUM LYMAN LUMBER 03/12/2020 0.00 380.87 ACH MADGAL MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 03/12/2020 0.00 153.00 ACH Marco Marco Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 970.68 ACH MasEle Master Electric Co. Inc. 03/12/2020 0.00 1,700.00 ACH MatTri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 03/12/2020 0.00 25.41 ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 0.00 511.56 ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 03/12/2020 0.00 34,442.10 ACH MinPum Minnesota Pump Works 03/12/2020 0.00 56.99 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 03/12/2020 0.00 3,686.17 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/12/2020 0.00 172.89 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 03/12/2020 0.00 3,152.06 ACH PREMRM PRECISE MRM LLC 03/12/2020 0.00 300.00 ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 12.30 ACH DaniReem Reem Danial 03/12/2020 0.00 277.20 ACH SafFas Safe-Fast, Inc. 03/12/2020 0.00 87.90 ACH STACONLL Sta Con LLC 03/12/2020 0.00 75.00 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 03/12/2020 0.00 3,238.00 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 0.00 1,441.91 ACH Nyhart The Howard E. Nyhart Co. Inc 03/12/2020 0.00 2,500.00 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 03/12/2020 0.00 30.40 ACH WAYTEK WAYTEK INC 03/12/2020 0.00 133.90 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/12/2020 0.00 300.00 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/12/2020 0.00 1,253.75 ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 03/12/2020 0.00 158.96 Report Total: 0.00 313,256.98 Page 3 of 3 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 03/13/2020 - 9:21 AM Name Check Da Account Description Amount AARP 03/05/2020 101-1560-4300 Refresher Course 6201.111 425.00 AARP 425.00 Afton St. Croix Co 03/05/2020 101-1560-4300 Senior Center Group - St. Croix River Cruise 152.35 Afton St. Croix Co 152.35 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 03/12/2020 101-1310-4360 Membership Renewal 1,093.75 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 1,093.75 B & F Fastener Supply 03/05/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 27.84 B & F Fastener Supply 27.84 BCA 03/12/2020 101-1120-4300 Criminal Background Investigation 30.00 BCA 03/05/2020 101-1120-4300 Criminal Background Investigation 45.00 BCA 75.00 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 03/05/2020 101-1180-4110 Elections coffee 199.70 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 03/05/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Coffee 881.48 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 1,081.18 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 03/05/2020 701-0000-4530 Heater 331.51 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 331.51 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 03/05/2020 400-4126-4703 PC's for 2020 PC Refresh 9,277.28 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 9,277.28 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 700-7043-4320 Monthly Service Charge 1,423.32 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 101-1550-4320 Monthly Service Charge 374.93 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 9.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service Charge 405.92 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 9.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service Charge 18.33 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Service Charge 46.47 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service Charge 1,336.23 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service Charge 1,570.97 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (03/13/2020 - 9:21 AM)Page 1 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service Charge 55.41 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 5.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 101-1370-4320 Monthly Service Charge 1,693.09 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service Charge 211.63 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service Charge 211.64 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/12/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service Charge 20.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 7,460.94 CenturyLink 03/12/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service Charge 32.00 CenturyLink 03/12/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service Charge 32.00 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1170-4310 Monthly Service 839.82 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 6.36 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 6.36 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1550-4310 Monthly Service 30.04 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1350-4310 Monthly Service 30.04 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1220-4310 Monthly Service 33.04 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1370-4310 Monthly Service 50.88 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1160-4320 Monthly Service 125.00 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1190-4310 Monthly Service 127.20 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1540-4310 Monthly Service 95.40 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 700-0000-4310 Monthly Service 15.12 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 700-7019-4310 Monthly Service 210.28 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 701-0000-4310 Monthly Service 15.13 CENTURYLINK 03/05/2020 101-1160-4320 Monthly Service 250.00 CENTURYLINK 1,898.67 CITY OF CHASKA 03/12/2020 101-1560-4300 Patsy Cline Show Transportation 1,064.30 CITY OF CHASKA 1,064.30 Compass Minerals America, Inc 03/05/2020 101-1320-4150 Bulk Coarse 2,745.62 Compass Minerals America, Inc 03/05/2020 101-1320-4150 Bulk Coarse 1,364.55 Compass Minerals America, Inc 4,110.17 CORE & MAIN LP 03/05/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 151.06 CORE & MAIN LP 151.06 Countryside Veterinary Clinic PLLC 03/05/2020 101-1260-4300 Pet Services 193.40 Countryside Veterinary Clinic PLLC 193.40 CUB FOODS 03/05/2020 605-6501-4300 Bakery items and Water 56.71 CUB FOODS 56.71 Culligan Bottled Water 03/12/2020 101-1220-4300 Bottled Water Service 28.66 Culligan Bottled Water 28.66 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 03/12/2020 101-1220-4140 Parts 119.56 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 03/12/2020 101-1220-4140 Parts 597.80 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (03/13/2020 - 9:21 AM)Page 2 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 03/12/2020 101-1220-4120 Parts 239.12 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 03/05/2020 701-0000-4120 Parts 345.39 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 1,301.87 Fatturi Ana 03/12/2020 101-1220-4370 EMT Application 40.00 Fatturi Ana 03/12/2020 101-1220-4370 Crown College: EMT Course 725.00 Fatturi Ana 765.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 03/12/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 2,249.05 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 2,249.05 GREEN MEADOWS INC 03/05/2020 101-1550-1193 Snow Plowing 880.00 GREEN MEADOWS INC 880.00 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1120-4040 LTD March 72.58 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1130-4040 LTD March 50.38 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1160-4040 LTD March 27.53 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1250-4040 LTD March 110.48 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1310-4040 LTD March 74.50 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1320-4040 LTD March 145.76 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1370-4040 LTD March 47.33 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1520-4040 LTD March 36.11 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1530-4040 LTD March 15.05 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1560-4040 LTD March 12.59 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1600-4040 LTD March 26.02 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1700-4040 LTD March 2.89 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1550-4040 LTD March 94.44 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1420-4040 LTD March 83.36 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1430-4040 LTD March 5.00 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 210-0000-4040 LTD March 18.67 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 720-7201-4040 LTD March 5.90 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 720-7202-4040 LTD March 5.90 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1170-4040 LTD March 12.87 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 101-1220-4040 LTD March 44.02 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 701-0000-4040 LTD March 78.45 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 700-0000-4040 LTD March 103.41 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 03/12/2020 720-0000-4040 LTD March 42.04 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 1,115.28 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/12/2020 101-0000-2009 03/13/2020 #304303 1,102.08 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/12/2020 700-0000-2009 03/13/2020 #304303 152.51 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/12/2020 701-0000-2009 03/13/2020 #304303 152.49 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/12/2020 720-0000-2009 03/13/2020 #304303 1.25 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 1,408.33 IUOE Local #49 03/12/2020 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 Local 49 dues 447.99 IUOE Local #49 03/12/2020 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 Local 49 dues 205.58 IUOE Local #49 03/12/2020 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 Local 49 dues 81.43 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (03/13/2020 - 9:21 AM)Page 3 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount IUOE Local #49 735.00 Jaguar Communications Inc 03/12/2020 700-7043-4310 Fiber Business Line 53.60 Jaguar Communications Inc 53.60 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER.03/12/2020 101-1220-4120 Parts 1,198.14 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER. 1,198.14 Kalogerson Chris 03/12/2020 101-1560-4300 Live Music 200.00 Kalogerson Chris 200.00 Kerr Matt 03/12/2020 101-1160-4370 Tuition Reimbursement - Linux 960.00 Kerr Matt 960.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 03/12/2020 400-4126-4703 Adobe Creative Cloud Subscription 540.13 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 03/12/2020 101-1120-4370 Training 520.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,060.13 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 03/12/2020 101-1170-4483 Workers Compensation Coverage 60,712.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 03/12/2020 101-1170-4483 Property/Casualty Coverage 45,598.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 106,310.00 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 03/12/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts 172.20 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC 172.20 MARTINO COLLEEN 03/12/2020 101-1170-4110 Kitchen Supplies 40.72 MARTINO COLLEEN 40.72 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 03/12/2020 101-1220-4130 Medical Supplies 106.17 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 03/12/2020 101-1220-4130 Medical Supplies 77.79 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 183.96 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 03/12/2020 701-0000-4509 Waste Water Services 172,654.49 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 03/12/2020 701-0000-4509 Strength Charge 7,804.43 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 180,458.92 MN ASSOCIATION OF SENIOR SERV 03/12/2020 101-1560-4370 MASS Annual Spring Conference 149.00 MN ASSOCIATION OF SENIOR SERV 149.00 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 03/12/2020 101-1350-4565 Traffic Signal Maintenance 269.75 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 269.75 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 03/12/2020 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 11.21 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 03/12/2020 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 11.19 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (03/13/2020 - 9:21 AM)Page 4 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 03/12/2020 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 1.60 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 03/12/2020 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 68.04 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 03/12/2020 210-0000-2011 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 3.96 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 96.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 03/05/2020 701-0000-4370 Collection System Operators Conference- Brett Martinson 390.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 03/05/2020 701-0000-4370 Charlie Chihos - Cert # B2783 - Wastewater Renewal 23.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 413.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.03/12/2020 101-1220-4360 Membership Renewal 2020 360.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. 360.00 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 03/05/2020 101-1320-4560 Signs 1,111.72 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 03/05/2020 101-1320-4560 Signs -289.35 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 822.37 Pederson Taylor 03/05/2020 101-1538-4300 Winter 2020 470.00 Pederson Taylor 470.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 03/12/2020 101-1370-4350 Feb 2020 Cleaning - public works 320.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 03/12/2020 700-0000-4350 Feb 2020 Cleaning - public works 40.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 03/12/2020 701-0000-4350 Feb 2020 Cleaning - public works 40.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 400.00 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District 03/05/2020 720-0000-4130 Stormwater Pond Research 2,000.00 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District 2,000.00 Roper Doug 03/12/2020 815-8202-2024 7509 W 77th St - Permit 2018-00941 250.00 Roper Doug 250.00 SABINSKE DEAN 03/12/2020 101-1320-4240 Safety Equipment 32.16 SABINSKE DEAN 32.16 Shipman Melonie 03/12/2020 101-1560-4300 Whale Singers 95.00 Shipman Melonie 95.00 Shred-It 03/12/2020 101-1160-4300 Shredding Service - FD Files 145.78 Shred-It 145.78 SIGNSOURCE 03/05/2020 101-1170-4110 Sign 58.50 SIGNSOURCE 58.50 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 03/12/2020 400-4117-4703 MS Exchange, Office, Access Renewals 13,075.28 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 03/12/2020 400-0000-4703 Microsoft SQL Server - BS&A Server 4,689.90 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 03/12/2020 400-4117-4703 MS Datacenter License Renewals 6,360.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (03/13/2020 - 9:21 AM)Page 5 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 03/05/2020 101-1160-4220 VMWare VCenter, vSphere Renewals 4,181.31 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 03/05/2020 400-4117-4703 Microsoft Annual SA Renewals 1,759.60 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 30,066.09 Southwest Suburban Publishing 03/12/2020 101-1180-4340 advertising 23.77 Southwest Suburban Publishing 03/12/2020 101-1310-4340 advertising 54.32 Southwest Suburban Publishing 03/12/2020 101-1310-4340 advertising 67.90 Southwest Suburban Publishing 03/12/2020 101-1410-4340 advertising 27.16 Southwest Suburban Publishing 03/12/2020 101-1611-4340 advertising 397.80 Southwest Suburban Publishing 570.95 Stevens Katie & Tyler 03/05/2020 815-8221-2024 Beehive Sidewalk 1,320.00 Stevens Katie & Tyler 1,320.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 03/05/2020 605-6501-4701 Project 14-08 Hwy 101 47.67 TFORCE FINAL MILE 47.67 TOWMASTER INC 03/05/2020 700-0000-4530 Tailgate Repair 1,500.00 TOWMASTER INC 03/05/2020 101-1320-4140 Kit Wiper 80.00 TOWMASTER INC 1,580.00 Trouvaille LLC 03/05/2020 815-8221-2024 Beehive Homes 10,012.63 Trouvaille LLC 10,012.63 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 03/05/2020 700-7019-4510 Exit Device 1,904.00 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 1,904.00 ULTIMATE MARTIAL ARTS INC.03/05/2020 101-1537-4300 Martial Arts Class 129.60 ULTIMATE MARTIAL ARTS INC. 129.60 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 03/12/2020 700-0000-4370 Training - Brett Martinson 1,125.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 1,125.00 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 03/05/2020 101-1220-4510 GFCI Damaged from Leaky pipe 18.42 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 18.42 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 77.97 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 101-1170-4350 Monthly Service 205.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 101-1370-4350 Monthly Service 121.48 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 700-0000-4350 Monthly Service 15.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 701-0000-4350 Monthly Service 15.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 101-1550-4350 Monthly Service 477.99 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 101-1190-4350 Monthly Service 240.59 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/12/2020 101-1220-4350 Monthly Service 30.38 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,184.43 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (03/13/2020 - 9:21 AM)Page 6 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount ZACK'S INC.03/12/2020 101-1320-4150 Parts 135.47 ZACK'S INC.03/12/2020 101-1550-4150 Parts 135.47 ZACK'S INC.03/12/2020 700-0000-4150 Parts 135.47 ZACK'S INC. 406.41 380,446.78 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (03/13/2020 - 9:21 AM)Page 7 of 7 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM Name Check Da Account Description Amount 3RD LAIR SKATEPARK 03/12/2020 101-1613-4300 Summer Skateboard Contest 500.00 3RD LAIR SKATEPARK 500.00 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 03/12/2020 700-0000-4550 Move SCADA Systems back into water tower 1,285.76 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,285.76 A1 Security Camera LLC 02/19/2020 400-4126-4530 Replacement Cameras Rec Center 1,505.07 A1 Security Camera LLC 02/19/2020 400-4126-4530 Replacement camera rec center 501.69 A1 Security Camera LLC 2,006.76 Act 1 Talent 02/19/2020 101-1535-4300 Dance Competition 4,144.00 Act 1 Talent 4,144.00 ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 03/05/2020 101-1538-4300 Winter 2020 1,742.00 ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 1,742.00 Adobe 02/19/2020 101-1160-4220 Adobe Photoshop Premier Element Upg 107.36 Adobe 02/19/2020 101-1160-4220 Adobe Captivate Upgrade 535.80 Adobe 643.16 Air Mechanical 02/19/2020 101-1550-4300 Heater Service - Public works 150.00 Air Mechanical 150.00 ALDI 02/19/2020 101-1560-4300 Noon Years Eve Party - Food 41.64 ALDI 41.64 Amazon 02/19/2020 400-4101-4703 Replacement IP Phones Bldg 1,173.75 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1160-4530 Replacement Headset 373.35 Amazon 02/19/2020 400-4101-4703 Mitel IP Phones Headsets 1,097.64 Amazon 02/19/2020 400-4126-4703 Server Room Monitors CH PW WWTP 987.61 Amazon 02/19/2020 400-4126-4703 Rack UPS Rec Center EWTP 326.64 Amazon 02/19/2020 400-4126-4703 iPad/Case/Apple Pencil/Kate A 664.02 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 89.07 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 13.59 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 63.23 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 7.79 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 55.97 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 18.86 Amazon 02/19/2020 400-4126-4530 Replacement Projector Rec Center 2,890.42 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 1 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1160-4300 Data Transfer Fee Sewer Video Dec 0.64 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1160-4150 4 Cat 6 Patch Cables 72.30 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1160-4150 4 Cat 6 Patch Cables 113.05 Amazon 02/19/2020 400-4126-4703 Computers & Networking Equipment 35.97 Amazon 02/19/2020 101-1220-4290 Tools 36.48 Amazon 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Equipment 112.65 Amazon 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Equipment 249.50 Amazon 02/19/2020 701-0000-4240 safety equipment 22.99 Amazon 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 safety equipment 22.99 Amazon 02/19/2020 700-0000-4260 Tools 158.97 Amazon 02/19/2020 700-0000-4260 Tools 38.50 Amazon 02/19/2020 700-0000-4260 Tools 177.92 Amazon 02/19/2020 701-0000-4150 Tools 15.98 Amazon 02/19/2020 701-0000-4551 Tools 54.55 Amazon 02/19/2020 700-0000-4150 Tools 429.48 Amazon 9,303.91 American Legion 02/19/2020 101-1220-4370 Chan Fire Training Meeting 855.12 American Legion 02/19/2020 101-1430-4370 Training Lunch 107.14 American Legion 962.26 American Planning Association 02/19/2020 101-1420-4370 APA Professional Membership - MacKenzie Walters 70.00 American Planning Association 02/19/2020 101-1420-4360 APA Professional Membership - MacKenzie Walters 341.00 American Planning Association 411.00 Apple.com 02/19/2020 701-0000-4310 iCloud storage 0.99 Apple.com 0.99 ArchiveSocial 02/19/2020 210-0000-4300 Social Media Archiving Service 1yr 2,388.00 ArchiveSocial 2,388.00 Arrowwood Resort 02/19/2020 101-1220-4370 Training 516.00 Arrowwood Resort 516.00 Badger State Inspection LLC 03/05/2020 815-8221-2024 Antenna and Structural Review - Sprint DO Macro Upgrade 1,600.00 Badger State Inspection LLC 1,600.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 03/12/2020 101-1120-4300 Cobra 60.35 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 03/12/2020 101-0000-2012 Cobra 26.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 86.35 BOLTON & MENK INC 03/12/2020 601-6045-4300 Power Blvd and Lake Lucy Road Pedestrian Improvements 3,820.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 3,820.00 Cafe Thyme 02/19/2020 101-1110-4370 Council Dinner 148.22 Cafe Thyme 148.22 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 2 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 03/12/2020 101-1220-4300 Fire Services Testing 850.00 CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 850.00 Carhartt 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Equipment 239.98 Carhartt 239.98 Carver County 03/12/2020 700-7043-4320 CarverLink Fiber - WWTP and Well 3 425.00 Carver County 03/12/2020 101-1160-4320 CarverLink Internet / Fiber 540.00 Carver County 965.00 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 101-1220-4320 Feb 2020 25.73 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 101-1350-4320 Feb 2020 671.98 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 101-1540-4320 Feb 2020 75.58 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 101-1550-4320 Feb 2020 80.51 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 101-1600-4320 Feb 2020 6.17 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 700-0000-4320 Feb 2020 23.69 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 700-7019-4320 Feb 2020 375.87 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 03/12/2020 701-0000-4320 Feb 2020 274.50 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 1,534.03 Chanhassen Floral 02/19/2020 101-1110-4370 Funeral 120.00 Chanhassen Floral 120.00 Chanhassen Vacuum Sales 02/19/2020 101-1220-4260 Vacuum with Tools 499.00 Chanhassen Vacuum Sales 499.00 Choice, Inc.03/12/2020 101-1220-4350 Work completed 1/20 - 2/14 194.70 Choice, Inc. 194.70 Corporate Card Annual Fee 02/19/2020 101-1130-4300 Annual Fee 12.00 Corporate Card Annual Fee 12.00 Crystal Infosystems LLC 03/12/2020 101-1170-4110 Toner Fire Station 1 389.92 Crystal Infosystems LLC 03/05/2020 101-1170-4110 Credit for duplicate payment -433.49 Crystal Infosystems LLC 03/05/2020 101-1170-4110 Ink 103.00 Crystal Infosystems LLC 03/05/2020 101-1170-4110 Ink 103.00 Crystal Infosystems LLC 03/05/2020 101-1170-4110 Ink/Toner 603.84 Crystal Infosystems LLC 766.27 Cub Foods 02/19/2020 101-1560-4300 Noon Years Eve Party - Food 79.30 Cub Foods 79.30 DAHL TERRY 03/05/2020 101-1538-4300 Winter 2020 470.00 DAHL TERRY 470.00 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.03/05/2020 101-1370-4150 Cleaner 78.17 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 3 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 78.17 DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES 03/12/2020 400-0000-4706 Project 18-199 Chan Commons Paver Replacement 1,625.20 DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES 1,625.20 Danial Reem 03/12/2020 101-1539-4300 Zumba Class 277.20 Danial Reem 277.20 Delta Airlines 02/19/2020 101-1130-4370 Conference 567.80 Delta Airlines 567.80 Dungarees 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Clothing - return -93.60 Dungarees 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 99.99 Dungarees 6.39 Eddie Bauer 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 86.50 Eddie Bauer 86.50 Eijkelkamp North American 02/19/2020 720-0000-4120 Tools 340.64 Eijkelkamp North American 340.64 Enabling Elements Inc 02/19/2020 700-0000-4310 Broad Band Internet Service 15.00 Enabling Elements Inc 15.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 03/12/2020 700-0000-4300 Water Samples collect - Feb 2020 500.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 500.00 Eventbrite 02/19/2020 101-1220-4370 Fully Involved Leadership MN 225.00 Eventbrite 225.00 Facebook 02/19/2020 101-1530-4375 Ads 54.05 Facebook 54.05 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/12/2020 101-1320-4120 Tools 37.46 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/12/2020 101-1320-4120 Tools 3.10 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/12/2020 700-0000-4550 Tools 19.84 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/12/2020 700-0000-4550 Tools 446.42 FASTENAL COMPANY 506.82 Galls LLC 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Equipment 117.50 Galls LLC 02/19/2020 701-0000-4240 Safety Equipment 117.49 Galls LLC 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Equipment 292.98 Galls LLC 527.97 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 4 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 03/05/2020 400-0000-4300 Service Calls 174.15 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 174.15 Grainger 02/19/2020 700-7019-4550 Parts 124.10 Grainger 124.10 Hach Company 02/19/2020 700-0000-4150 Supplies 116.75 Hach Company 02/19/2020 700-7043-4150 Supplies 974.77 Hach Company 02/19/2020 700-7043-4150 Supplies 995.27 Hach Company 2,086.79 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 03/12/2020 700-7019-4160 Chemicals 12,872.83 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 12,872.83 Henning Professional Services, Inc 03/05/2020 605-6501-4300 TH 101 From CSAH 61 to CSAH 14 4,834.98 Henning Professional Services, Inc 4,834.98 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 03/12/2020 401-0000-4706 Project 016-042 911.25 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 911.25 Home Depot 02/19/2020 101-1160-4150 Filter and Treatment Server Rm Humidifer 30.00 Home Depot 02/19/2020 101-1220-4260 Tools 279.91 Home Depot 02/19/2020 701-0000-4150 Parts 56.06 Home Depot 02/19/2020 701-0000-4150 Parts 20.49 Home Depot 02/19/2020 701-0000-4260 Tools 202.78 Home Depot 02/19/2020 701-0000-4150 Supplies 70.35 Home Depot 02/19/2020 701-0000-4260 Tools 153.39 Home Depot 812.98 Homeland Security and Emergency Management 02/19/2020 700-0000-4509 EPCRA Tier II Annual Fees 128.11 Homeland Security and Emergency Management 128.11 Hoops & Threads LLC 03/12/2020 720-0000-4130 Custom Embroidery 18.00 Hoops & Threads LLC 18.00 Houlihan's 02/19/2020 101-1220-4370 Carver Dinner 165.96 Houlihan's 165.96 Hydraulic World 02/19/2020 101-1550-4120 Hose Coupling 347.91 Hydraulic World 347.91 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 03/12/2020 101-1550-4400 Portable Restrooms Feb 2020 2,349.75 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 2,349.75 Indoor Landscapes Inc 03/12/2020 101-1170-4110 March Plant Service 187.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 5 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Indoor Landscapes Inc 187.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/12/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 41.22 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/12/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 81.53 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/12/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 84.80 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/12/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 121.46 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 329.01 J.W. Pepper 02/19/2020 101-1560-4130 Chanolaires Music Supplies 80.00 J.W. Pepper 80.00 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 03/12/2020 101-1220-4260 Superior Flamefighter Nozzle 100.21 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 100.21 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 03/05/2020 101-1550-4510 Repair unit heater 88.38 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 88.38 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 03/05/2020 101-1370-4170 Grease 45.00 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 03/05/2020 101-1370-4170 Fuel 15,064.20 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 15,109.20 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/12/2020 601-6043-4752 Project 160511045.3 - Minnewashta Parkway rehab 37,473.58 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/12/2020 605-6501-4300 Project 160511044.3 TH101 Reconstruction 38,245.79 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/12/2020 601-6046-4752 Project 160511046.3 2020 Pavement Rehab 9,243.18 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 605-6501-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction 18,027.62 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 102,990.17 Life Support Innovations LLC 03/05/2020 101-1220-4130 AED Inventory 534.10 Life Support Innovations LLC 534.10 Lunds & Byerly's 02/19/2020 101-1120-4370 KFS Items for Egg Bake 39.75 Lunds & Byerly's 02/19/2020 101-1120-4370 Bakery Goods for KFS Meeting 31.33 Lunds & Byerly's 02/19/2020 101-1120-4370 Breakfast Meeting with 112 Leaders 20.66 Lunds & Byerly's 91.74 LYMAN LUMBER 03/12/2020 101-1550-4150 Lumber 307.36 LYMAN LUMBER 03/12/2020 101-1550-4150 Lumber 73.51 LYMAN LUMBER 380.87 Macy's 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 43.98 Macy's 02/19/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing 43.97 Macy's 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 74.40 Macy's 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 111.23 Macy's 273.58 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 03/12/2020 101-1140-4302 Legal Services 153.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 6 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 153.00 Marco Inc 03/12/2020 101-1170-4410 printer 720.68 Marco Inc 03/12/2020 700-0000-4410 printer 100.00 Marco Inc 03/12/2020 701-0000-4410 printer 100.00 Marco Inc 03/12/2020 720-0000-4410 printer 50.00 Marco Inc 970.68 Master Electric Co. Inc.03/12/2020 701-0000-4530 Lift Station 18 Electrical Inspection 1,700.00 Master Electric Co. Inc. 1,700.00 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.03/12/2020 101-1370-4170 Fuel 25.41 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.03/05/2020 101-1370-4150 Parts 521.73 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 547.14 McDonald's 02/19/2020 101-1220-4290 Fire call 171.37 McDonald's 171.37 McMaster-Carr 02/19/2020 700-7019-4550 Parts 96.83 McMaster-Carr 96.83 Menards 02/19/2020 700-7019-4550 Supplies 86.01 Menards 86.01 Merchology 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 128.99 Merchology 128.99 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 101-1160-4530 Parts 18.52 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 101-1220-4120 Parts 65.85 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 101-1320-4150 Parts 18.87 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 85.03 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 700-0000-4150 Parts 144.42 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 700-0000-4350 Parts 15.22 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 29.29 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 700-7019-4150 Parts 32.38 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 700-7043-4150 Parts 53.08 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 03/12/2020 701-0000-4150 Parts 48.90 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 511.56 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 03/12/2020 101-1250-3816 SAC -347.90 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 03/12/2020 701-0000-2023 SAC 34,790.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 34,442.10 Militarynames.com 02/19/2020 701-0000-4240 Names on Jackets 7.00 Militarynames.com 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Names on Jackets 7.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 7 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Militarynames.com 14.00 Mills Fleet Farm 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 12.50 Mills Fleet Farm 02/19/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing 12.49 Mills Fleet Farm 24.99 Minnesota Equipment 03/05/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 22.70 Minnesota Equipment 22.70 Minnesota Pump Works 03/12/2020 701-0000-4530 Padlock Bars for Lift Station 7 56.99 Minnesota Pump Works 56.99 Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association 02/19/2020 101-1220-4370 NFA Class 200.00 Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Association 200.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 03/12/2020 101-1250-3818 Monthly Building Permit Surcharge -75.23 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 03/12/2020 101-0000-2022 Monthly Building Permit Surcharge 3,761.40 MN Dept of Labor and Industry 02/19/2020 101-1250-4360 Membership 20.00 MN Dept of Labor and Industry 3,706.17 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/05/2020 101-1350-4320 Kiowa Trl & St. Hwy 101 Lights 30.33 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/05/2020 101-1350-4320 Bandimere Park Lights 163.31 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/05/2020 101-1350-4320 Hwy 101/Pionr Trl Signl 5,374.06 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/05/2020 101-1600-4320 Hwy 101/Pionr Trl Signl 523.38 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/05/2020 700-0000-4320 Hwy 101/Pionr Trl Signl 132.10 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/05/2020 701-0000-4320 Hwy 101/Pionr Trl Signl 533.78 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 6,756.96 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/12/2020 101-1220-4120 Filters 54.57 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/12/2020 101-1320-4120 Filter 12.36 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/12/2020 101-1220-4120 Parts 8.41 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/12/2020 101-1550-4120 Filters 97.55 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/05/2020 101-1320-4120 Filters 28.06 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 200.95 NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC.03/05/2020 210-0000-4300 National Community Survey 1,120.00 NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC. 1,120.00 NORTH COOP 02/19/2020 101-1220-4290 New Years Dinner 60.45 NORTH COOP 60.45 Office Max/Office Depot 02/19/2020 400-4126-4703 Keyboard Mouse cable USB 84.15 Office Max/Office Depot 02/19/2020 101-1220-4290 Fire Inv Books for trucks 112.35 Office Max/Office Depot 196.50 Old Log Theater 02/19/2020 101-1560-4300 Meal & Show Tickets 500.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 8 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Old Log Theater 02/19/2020 101-1560-4300 Meal & Show Tickets 1,780.52 Old Log Theater 2,280.52 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 03/05/2020 101-1220-4520 Parts 77.64 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 03/05/2020 101-1550-4140 Parts 243.12 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 03/05/2020 101-1520-4140 Parts 20.58 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 341.34 Party City 02/19/2020 101-1560-4130 Noon Years Eve Party Supplies 46.43 Party City 46.43 Pedretti Christine Lea 03/05/2020 101-1539-4300 Yoga Instruction (Jan - Feb 2020) 663.00 Pedretti Christine Lea 663.00 Pizzaioli 02/19/2020 101-1220-4290 Funeral Detail 42.47 Pizzaioli 42.47 Postmaster 02/19/2020 101-1310-4340 Certified mail 6.85 Postmaster 6.85 Potentia MN Solar 03/12/2020 700-0000-4320 Services 701.81 Potentia MN Solar 03/12/2020 101-1190-4320 Services 1,374.24 Potentia MN Solar 03/12/2020 101-1170-4320 Services 1,076.01 Potentia MN Solar 3,152.06 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 03/05/2020 101-1320-4120 Equipment 165.53 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 165.53 PRECISE MRM LLC 03/12/2020 101-1320-4310 2020-01 Subscription 300.00 PRECISE MRM LLC 300.00 Premium Waters, Inc 03/12/2020 101-1550-4120 Monthly Water 12.30 Premium Waters, Inc 12.30 Red Tool Store 02/19/2020 700-7019-4150 Tools 643.18 Red Tool Store 643.18 Redstone American Grill 02/19/2020 101-1120-4370 Lunch Meeting 46.00 Redstone American Grill 46.00 Rotary Club 02/19/2020 101-1520-4360 Rotary Club Membership 53.00 Rotary Club 53.00 Safe-Fast, Inc.03/12/2020 101-1310-4120 Jacket 87.90 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 9 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Safe-Fast, Inc. 87.90 Sensible Land Use Coalition 02/19/2020 101-1420-4360 Membership Renewal 250.00 Sensible Land Use Coalition 250.00 ShareFile 02/19/2020 101-1160-4300 Sharefile Service 565.33 ShareFile 565.33 Spectrum 02/19/2020 101-1120-4370 Fraud Charge - Credit on 2/15 statement. 519.66 Spectrum 519.66 Sta Con LLC 03/12/2020 701-0000-4530 Freight 75.00 Sta Con LLC 75.00 Star Tribune 02/19/2020 101-1530-4360 Newpaper 453.44 Star Tribune 453.44 SUMMIT COMPANIES 03/12/2020 101-1550-4300 5 Year Internal Inspection 1,000.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 03/12/2020 101-1370-4300 5 Year Internal Inspection 1,190.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 03/12/2020 101-1170-4300 5 Year Internal Inspection 990.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 03/12/2020 700-7043-4150 Annual Fire Extinguisher Inspection 58.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 03/05/2020 101-1220-4510 Feb 2020 Inspection of 1 wet system 1,165.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 03/05/2020 101-1220-4300 Annual Fire Extinguisher Inspection 564.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 4,967.00 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1120-4040 March 33.36 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1130-4040 March 23.23 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1160-4040 March 12.53 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1250-4040 March 50.32 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1310-4040 March 42.94 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1320-4040 March 56.88 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1370-4040 March 20.83 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1520-4040 March 16.80 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1530-4040 March 6.82 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1560-4040 March 5.76 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1600-4040 March 11.93 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1700-4040 March 1.33 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1550-4040 March 42.36 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1420-4040 March 38.22 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1430-4040 March 2.28 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 210-0000-4040 March 8.48 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 720-7201-4040 March 2.69 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 720-7202-4040 March 2.69 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1170-4040 March 3.81 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-1220-4040 March 20.45 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 701-0000-4040 March 35.50 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 700-0000-4040 March 46.93 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 720-0000-4040 March 19.25 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-0000-2011 March 663.34 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 10 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 210-0000-2011 March 6.29 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 700-0000-2011 March 125.56 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 701-0000-2011 March 125.56 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 720-0000-2011 March 9.31 Sun Life Financial 03/12/2020 101-0000-2011 March - Cobra 6.46 Sun Life Financial 1,441.91 Target 02/19/2020 101-1617-4130 First Aid Supplies 12.75 Target 02/19/2020 101-1530-4150 Cleaning Supplies 10.05 Target 22.80 Tavern 4&5 02/19/2020 101-1120-4370 Lunch 50.44 Tavern 4&5 50.44 Tessco 02/19/2020 701-0000-4530 Cable 3,859.74 Tessco 3,859.74 The Howard E. Nyhart Co. Inc 03/12/2020 101-1130-4301 Project 211990.HCADM.GAI2020 2,500.00 The Howard E. Nyhart Co. Inc 2,500.00 U of M Contlearning 02/19/2020 101-1250-4370 Training Seminars 290.00 U of M Contlearning 02/19/2020 101-1250-4370 Training Seminars 390.00 U of M Contlearning 02/19/2020 101-1250-4370 Training Seminars 295.00 U of M Contlearning 975.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 03/05/2020 700-0000-4530 Chanhassen Tower 3 Service Work 1,550.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 03/05/2020 700-7019-4530 Chanhassen EWTP Service Work 1,910.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 03/05/2020 700-0000-4530 Chanhassen Tower 3 Service Work 2,135.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 03/05/2020 701-0000-4530 Chanhassen Lift Station Service Work 1,450.00 ULTIMATE CONTROLS ELECTRIC LLC 7,045.00 United Farmers Cooperative 03/05/2020 101-1320-4240 Clothing 379.96 United Farmers Cooperative 379.96 UNITED WAY 03/12/2020 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00413.03.2020 United Way 30.40 UNITED WAY 30.40 USA BLUE BOOK 03/05/2020 700-0000-4550 Chlorine 3,410.17 USA BLUE BOOK 3,410.17 USABlueBook 02/19/2020 701-0000-4120 Supplies 256.41 USABlueBook 256.41 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1550-4310 Cell Phones 382.16 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1520-4310 Cell Phones 42.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1600-4310 Cell Phones 163.48 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 11 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1530-4310 Cell Phones 42.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 700-0000-4310 Cell Phones 443.99 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 701-0000-4310 Cell Phones 393.36 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 720-0000-4310 Cell Phones 526.06 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1160-4310 Cell Phones 95.30 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1120-4310 Cell Phones 260.35 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1170-4310 Cell Phones 25.23 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1260-4310 Cell Phones 35.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1130-4310 Cell Phones 71.59 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1250-4310 Cell Phones 290.35 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1310-4310 Cell Phones 84.34 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1370-4310 Cell Phones 93.11 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1320-4310 Cell Phones 321.48 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1220-4310 Cell Phones 505.42 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-0000-2033 Cell Phones 11.49 VERIZON WIRELESS 03/05/2020 101-1220-4310 Cell Phone 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 3,828.03 WAYTEK INC 03/12/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 133.90 WAYTEK INC 133.90 Whel-Tech 02/19/2020 701-0000-4530 Flood Switch 312.48 Whel-Tech 02/19/2020 701-0000-4530 Parts 98.30 Whel-Tech 410.78 Workboots.com 02/19/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing allowance 134.96 Workboots.com 02/19/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing allowance 134.95 Workboots.com 269.91 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/12/2020 700-7050-4751 West Water Treatment Plant 300.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/12/2020 720-0000-4300 The Park 2nd addition Stormwater Review - Dec 2019 1,253.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 720-0000-4300 Carver County TH5 Regional Trail 532.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 601-6039-4300 Lake Drive East Improvement Project 18-02 255.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 601-6038-4300 2018 Street Improvement Project 4,678.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 601-6032-4300 Street Construction Project No 16-01 1,520.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 720-0000-4300 The Park 2nd addition Stormwater Review 850.25 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 720-0000-4300 LGU - HCRRA Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Wetland 2,057.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 720-0000-4300 Moments WCA Review 789.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 605-0000-4752 Highway 101 Wetland Permitting 1,076.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 03/05/2020 601-6045-4752 LGU Powers Blvd and Lake Lucy Rd Improvements 266.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 13,578.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 101-1350-4320 Signal Lights 21,217.64 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 601-0000-3080 Signal Lights 168.51 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 101-1600-4320 Park Shelter 156.60 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 601-0000-3080 Park Shelter 12.27 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 101-1540-4320 Parks 647.43 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 101-1600-4320 Parks 582.94 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 101-1550-4320 Parks 313.84 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 601-0000-3080 Parks 133.79 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Utilities 12.71 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 12 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Utilities 7.44 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Utilities 181.70 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/05/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Utilities 13.23 XCEL ENERGY INC 23,448.10 ZIEGLER INC 03/12/2020 700-0000-4530 Parts 158.96 ZIEGLER INC 03/05/2020 700-0000-4530 Parts 37.20 ZIEGLER INC 03/05/2020 700-0000-4150 Parts 299.73 ZIEGLER INC 495.89 313,256.98 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (03/13/2020 - 9:22 AM)Page 13 of 13 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject Review of Claims Paid 04­13­2020 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: I.4. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on April 13, 2020: Check Numbers Amounts 172829 – 172977 $190,835.78 ACH Payments $419,033.09 Total All Claims $609,868.87 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 4/3/2020 1:44 PM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ABCCLE ABC Cleaning, LLC 03/19/2020 0.00 230.00172829 AE2SCON AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 03/19/2020 0.00 778.25172830 APAGRO APACHE GROUP 03/19/2020 0.00 1,037.10172831 AWWA AWWA 03/19/2020 0.00 290.00172832 bffas B & F Fastener Supply 03/19/2020 0.00 9.20172833 BCATRA BCA 03/19/2020 0.00 30.00172834 BERRSCOT Scott Or Lindsey BERRY 03/19/2020 0.00 19.00172835 BeuIry Iryna Beutz 03/19/2020 0.00 19.00172836 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/19/2020 0.00 1,243.98172837 CouVet Countryside Veterinary Clinic PLLC 03/19/2020 0.00 144.00172838 FoxCan Candyce Fox 03/19/2020 0.00 45.00172839 GOETLORE LORETTA GOETZINGER 03/19/2020 0.00 40.00172840 HeaPar HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 0.00 70,569.46172841 HinLyn Lynda Hing 03/19/2020 0.00 19.00172842 jacmol Molly Jackett 03/19/2020 0.00 28.00172843 LAUPIA LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 03/19/2020 0.00 101.00172844 leenik Nikki Lee 03/19/2020 0.00 19.00172845 MetGar Metro Garage Door Company 03/19/2020 0.00 755.37172846 MinuPre Minuteman Press 03/19/2020 0.00 48.00172847 NEENAH NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY 03/19/2020 0.00 167.00172848 PAIPAP Paint,Paper, Scissors 03/19/2020 0.00 300.00172849 PitBow Pitney Bowes Inc.03/19/2020 0.00 1,026.48172850 Senja Senja Inc 03/19/2020 0.00 246.40172851 shakel Kelly Shaw 03/19/2020 0.00 19.00172852 triedeea DeeAnn Triethart 03/19/2020 0.00 9.99172853 UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 03/19/2020 0.00 225.00172854 LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 03/19/2020 0.00 1,614.89172855 POST POSTMASTER 03/20/2020 0.00 634.34172856 abbwen Wendy Abbey 03/20/2020 0.00 23.00172857 AdamPatr Patricia Adams 03/20/2020 0.00 21.00172858 bartom Tom Barrett 03/20/2020 0.00 20.00172859 BERGGARY GARY BERG 03/20/2020 0.00 372.60172860 BRYROC BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 03/20/2020 0.00 382.71172861 bucmar Marlys Bucher 03/20/2020 0.00 40.00172862 CarCouPa Carver County Parks 03/20/2020 0.00 245.50172863 Crew2 Crew2 03/20/2020 0.00 30.36172864 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 03/20/2020 0.00 48.54172865 EXCFIR EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 03/20/2020 0.00 9,150.00172866 FreJak Jake Freeland 03/20/2020 0.00 75.00172867 InsRea Institute of Reading Development 03/20/2020 0.00 800.00172868 LARSLORR LORRELLE LARSON 03/20/2020 0.00 41.53172869 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 03/20/2020 0.00 23.00172870 MNHEAL MN DEPT OF HEALTH 03/20/2020 0.00 23.00172871 rismic Michael Rishavy 03/20/2020 0.00 40.00172872 SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 03/20/2020 0.00 55.43172873 SOUCEN South Central College 03/20/2020 0.00 480.00172874 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/20/2020 0.00 297.26172875 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (4/3/2020 1:44 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/26/2020 0.00 1,608.33172883 ALLDATA ALLDATA LLC 03/27/2020 0.00 1,500.00172884 UB*01917 ATTORNEY TITLE GROUP 03/27/2020 0.00 29.32172885 BERRSCOT Scott Or Lindsey BERRY 03/27/2020 0.00 20.00172886 BERCOF BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 03/27/2020 0.00 651.51172887 BoldLynn Lynnette Boldt 03/27/2020 0.00 13.00172888 UB*01914 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 16.50172889 UB*01918 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 13.38172890 UB*01920 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 106.11172891 UB*01929 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 19.83172892 UB*01933 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 81.03172893 CARENV CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03/27/2020 0.00 140.00172894 CenLin CenturyLink 03/27/2020 0.00 59.19172895 UB*01926 ERIC & ERIN CHINNOCK 03/27/2020 0.00 53.84172896 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 03/27/2020 0.00 2,289.68172897 ElsbRuth Ruth Elsberry 03/27/2020 0.00 37.00172898 FranShir Shirley Frantz 03/27/2020 0.00 13.00172899 GilGer Geri Gillis 03/27/2020 0.00 58.00172900 GOETLORE LORETTA GOETZINGER 03/27/2020 0.00 30.00172901 GreyCon Greystone Construction Co.03/27/2020 0.00 18,690.00172902 HanMarg Marg Hand 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172903 HarHel Helen Harwood 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172904 HenMin Minette Hendricks 03/27/2020 0.00 13.00172905 HorMar Mark Hornung 03/27/2020 0.00 15.00172906 HusGlo Gloria Husby 03/27/2020 0.00 13.00172907 JACOJUDY Judy Jacobs 03/27/2020 0.00 24.00172908 JaeEmm Emmy Jaenicke 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172909 JohnDon Don Johnson 03/27/2020 0.00 12.87172910 JohnJer Jerre Johnson 03/27/2020 0.00 22.00172911 JOHMAR MaryAnn Johnson 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172912 KapaPat Pat Kapaun 03/27/2020 0.00 22.00172913 KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 03/27/2020 0.00 6,978.71172914 UB*01934 LIEF & KELLY KJORNESS 03/27/2020 0.00 61.37172915 KranNanc Nancy Krantz 03/27/2020 0.00 44.00172916 LANDJANE Janeen Landsberger 03/27/2020 0.00 22.00172917 LawPro Lawson Products, Inc.03/27/2020 0.00 51.72172918 UB*01915 JOHANNA LEE 03/27/2020 0.00 26.95172919 UB*01927 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 20.33172920 UB*01930 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 40.65172921 UB*01922 BRENT & JACQUELINE LIBENGOOD 03/27/2020 0.00 1,094.96172922 LiviShir Shirley Livingston 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172923 MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 03/27/2020 0.00 163.63172924 UB*01932 TREVOR & JESSICA MELLBERG 03/27/2020 0.00 76.35172925 UB*01916 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 44.81172926 UB*01919 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 33.03172927 UB*01928 MINNETONKA TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 79.01172928 MitMar Marilyn Mitchell 03/27/2020 0.00 13.00172929 MolMar Mary Molvig 03/27/2020 0.00 17.00172930 EckHel Helen Nielsen-Eckstein 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172931 ParkMarc Dr. Marcie Parker 03/27/2020 0.00 22.00172932 PaulCaro Carole Paulsen 03/27/2020 0.00 26.00172933 PULTHOME Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 0.00 19,876.00172934 RanPat Patricia Ranz 03/27/2020 0.00 24.00172935 UB*01935 RESULT TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 23.33172936 RouJea Jeanne Rouch 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172937 SEH SEH 03/27/2020 0.00 4,583.50172938 SicJan Janis Sicard 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172939 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (4/3/2020 1:44 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 03/27/2020 0.00 925.00172940 SPAHSAND Sandra Spahr 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172941 SULLPATR Patricia Sullivan 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172942 TFOFIN TFORCE FINAL MILE 03/27/2020 0.00 80.00172943 UB*01925 TITLE CHOICE LLC 03/27/2020 0.00 56.97172944 UB*01923 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 03/27/2020 0.00 14.80172945 WalkMar Martha Walker 03/27/2020 0.00 12.00172946 UB*01924 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 03/27/2020 0.00 55.77172947 UB*01931 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 03/27/2020 0.00 198.51172948 UB*01921 WEICHERT NATIONAL TITLE 03/27/2020 0.00 10.68172949 UB*01936 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.03/27/2020 0.00 114.36172950 WetzJoAn Dena Wetzel 03/27/2020 0.00 33.00172951 ROPEDON DONALD ROPER 03/27/2020 0.00 250.00172952 ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 04/03/2020 0.00 1,218.84172953 AtsGeo George Atsidakos 04/03/2020 0.00 100.00172954 BoeEmma Alison Boeder 04/03/2020 0.00 5.00172955 CLACCO CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 04/03/2020 0.00 94.32172956 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 04/03/2020 0.00 2,075.18172957 DooAsh Ashley Dooling 04/03/2020 0.00 17.00172958 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/03/2020 0.00 1,040.68172959 FerrStev Steve Ferraro 04/03/2020 0.00 233.10172960 GroMic Michael Groenewold 04/03/2020 0.00 100.00172961 JANPLU JANECKY PLUMBING INC 04/03/2020 0.00 45.00172962 SIMGRI Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP 04/03/2020 0.00 5,515.00172963 keykath Kathy Keyworth 04/03/2020 0.00 100.00172964 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 04/03/2020 0.00 4,485.00172965 LubTec Lube Tech ESI 04/03/2020 0.00 218.06172966 MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 04/03/2020 0.00 62.42172967 MetGar Metro Garage Door Company 04/03/2020 0.00 175.95172968 MSFCA MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.04/03/2020 0.00 60.00172969 ParYuv Yuvan Parvataneni 04/03/2020 0.00 17.00172970 RECASS RECYCLING ASSOCIATION OF MN 04/03/2020 0.00 300.00172971 RenBy Renewal By Anderson 04/03/2020 0.00 165.72172972 SHATRE Shadywood Tree Experts and Landscaping 04/03/2020 0.00 18,836.25172973 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 04/03/2020 0.00 1,307.50172974 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 04/03/2020 0.00 1,971.34172975 VanPam Pamela Vanek 04/03/2020 0.00 10.00172976 WINGRICH RICHARD WING 04/03/2020 0.00 100.00172977 Report Total (142 checks): 190,835.78 0.00 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (4/3/2020 1:44 PM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 4/3/2020 1:47 PM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH A1ELE A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 03/19/2020 0.00 138.66 ACH apadan Apadana LLC 03/19/2020 0.00 27,214.84 ACH BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS 03/19/2020 0.00 80.99 ACH carcou Carver County 03/19/2020 0.00 100.00 ACH carcou Carver County 03/19/2020 0.00 216,827.30 ACH HeaStr Health Strategies 03/19/2020 0.00 415.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/19/2020 0.00 13,779.84 ACH JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 03/19/2020 0.00 9.39 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 03/19/2020 0.00 162.85 ACH MausKerr Kerry Maus 03/19/2020 0.00 168.75 ACH kidplu Kidd Plumbing Inc 03/19/2020 0.00 740.50 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/19/2020 0.00 44,601.53 ACH LigPla Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc. 03/19/2020 0.00 80.50 ACH MinEqu Minnesota Equipment 03/19/2020 0.00 1,055.75 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 03/19/2020 0.00 120.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/19/2020 0.00 234.16 ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 03/19/2020 0.00 7,054.47 ACH SPSSLP SPS Companies Inc 03/19/2020 0.00 6.43 ACH TBEI TBEI, Inc 03/19/2020 0.00 655.44 ACH VESSCO VESSCO INC 03/19/2020 0.00 3,475.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 03/19/2020 0.00 2,591.54 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 03/20/2020 0.00 12,349.02 ACH Avesis Fidelity Security Life 03/20/2020 0.00 213.47 ACH HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 03/20/2020 0.00 45.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/20/2020 0.00 126.81 ACH NYSPUB NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 03/20/2020 0.00 9,126.06 ACH POMTIR POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 03/20/2020 0.00 1,289.38 ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 03/20/2020 0.00 503.70 ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 03/20/2020 0.00 31.45 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 03/20/2020 0.00 26.96 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 03/20/2020 0.00 5,435.46 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 03/26/2020 0.00 30.40 ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 03/27/2020 0.00 131.25 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 03/27/2020 0.00 39.78 ACH BarEng Barr Engineering Company 03/27/2020 0.00 10,000.00 ACH BROAWA BROADWAY AWARDS 03/27/2020 0.00 66.21 ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 03/27/2020 0.00 99.16 ACH Cues Cues, Inc. 03/27/2020 0.00 134.74 ACH DelDen Delta Dental 03/27/2020 0.00 2,477.40 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 03/27/2020 0.00 686.98 ACH GSDIR GS DIRECT INC 03/27/2020 0.00 20.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/27/2020 0.00 17.28 ACH JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 03/27/2020 0.00 111.25 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 03/27/2020 0.00 8,211.69 ACH BENSKAYE KAYE L BENSON 03/27/2020 0.00 392.00 ACH LubTec Lube Tech ESI 03/27/2020 VOID 218.06 0.00 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/27/2020 0.00 1,199.55 ACH ONSMED On-Site Medical Services Inc 03/27/2020 0.00 70.00 ACH OPG-3 OPG-3, Inc 03/27/2020 0.00 450.00 Page 1 of 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH SafFas Safe-Fast, Inc. 03/27/2020 0.00 449.70 ACH SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 03/27/2020 0.00 9.37 ACH STRGUA STRATOGUARD LLC 03/27/2020 0.00 176.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 0.00 9,064.93 ACH 3DSPE 3D SPECIALTIES 04/03/2020 0.00 227.86 ACH BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS 04/03/2020 0.00 87.10 ACH carcou Carver County 04/03/2020 0.00 811.50 ACH PedrChri Christine Lea Pedretti 04/03/2020 0.00 79.95 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 04/03/2020 0.00 4,882.00 ACH EMEAPP EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 04/03/2020 0.00 516.11 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/03/2020 0.00 25.84 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergengy Group 04/03/2020 0.00 1,150.00 ACH MADGAL MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 04/03/2020 0.00 897.34 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/03/2020 0.00 174.83 ACH NYSPUB NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 04/03/2020 0.00 1,033.68 ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 04/03/2020 0.00 368.00 ACH SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 04/03/2020 0.00 103.61 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 04/03/2020 0.00 686.02 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 0.00 4,094.57 ACH VESSCO VESSCO INC 04/03/2020 0.00 3,475.00 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/03/2020 0.00 408.75 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 0.00 17,512.99 Report Total: 218.06 419,033.09 Page 2 of 2 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM Name Check Da Account Description Amount Abbey Wendy 03/20/2020 101-1560-3637 Class Cancellation Refund 23.00 Abbey Wendy 23.00 ABC Cleaning, LLC 03/19/2020 101-1170-4350 Cleaning 230.00 ABC Cleaning, LLC 230.00 Adams Patricia 03/20/2020 101-1560-3637 Refund due to cancellation of class 21.00 Adams Patricia 21.00 AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 03/19/2020 700-0000-4300 2020 SCADA Services 778.25 AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 778.25 ALLDATA LLC 03/27/2020 101-1160-4300 Annual Renewal Alldata Repair Service. 1,500.00 ALLDATA LLC 1,500.00 ALLSTREAM 04/03/2020 101-1160-4300 Mitel phone system maintenance 490.84 ALLSTREAM 04/03/2020 101-1160-4220 Mitel Phone Manger Annual Renewal 728.00 ALLSTREAM 1,218.84 APACHE GROUP 03/19/2020 101-1170-4510 Supplies 1,037.10 APACHE GROUP 1,037.10 Atsidakos George 04/03/2020 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Atsidakos George 100.00 ATTORNEY TITLE GROUP 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.47 ATTORNEY TITLE GROUP 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.66 ATTORNEY TITLE GROUP 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.51 ATTORNEY TITLE GROUP 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.68 ATTORNEY TITLE GROUP 29.32 AWWA 03/19/2020 700-0000-4370 Operator School Registration - Charles Chihos 290.00 AWWA 290.00 B & F Fastener Supply 03/19/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts 9.20 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 1 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount B & F Fastener Supply 9.20 Barrett Tom 03/20/2020 101-1560-3637 Refund for Driver Course 20.00 Barrett Tom 20.00 BCA 03/19/2020 101-1120-4300 Criminal Background Investigation 30.00 BCA 30.00 BERG GARY 03/20/2020 101-1550-4240 Clothing Allowance 275.18 BERG GARY 03/20/2020 101-1550-4240 Clothing Allowance 97.42 BERG GARY 372.60 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 03/27/2020 101-1170-4110 Coffee 651.51 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 651.51 BERRY Scott Or Lindsey 03/19/2020 101-1806-3642 Indoor Golf #2202.118 19.00 BERRY Scott Or Lindsey 03/27/2020 101-1538-3631 Class Withdraw 20.00 BERRY Scott Or Lindsey 39.00 Beutz Iryna 03/19/2020 101-1806-3642 Indoor Golf #2202.118 19.00 Beutz Iryna 19.00 Boeder Alison 04/03/2020 101-1612-3630 Easter Egg Candy Hunt Cancellation 5.00 Boeder Alison 5.00 Boldt Lynnette 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 13.00 Boldt Lynnette 13.00 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 03/20/2020 101-1320-4150 Rock 382.71 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 382.71 Bucher Marlys 03/20/2020 101-1560-3637 Refund for driver refresher course 40.00 Bucher Marlys 40.00 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.86 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.38 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.08 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.18 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.31 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.44 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.04 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.59 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 31.68 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 55.78 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.62 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.03 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 2 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.81 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.13 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.32 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.57 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.79 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 33.66 BURNET TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 46.58 BURNET TITLE 236.85 CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 03/27/2020 101-1320-4120 Tires 140.00 CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 140.00 Carver County Parks 03/20/2020 101-1731-4300 MLK Day Camp 157.50 Carver County Parks 03/20/2020 101-1611-4300 Feb Fest Kicksledding 52.00 Carver County Parks 03/20/2020 101-1731-4300 Beginner XC Ski Lesson 36.00 Carver County Parks 245.50 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly services 43.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/19/2020 101-1220-4320 Monthly services 790.73 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/19/2020 101-1530-4320 Monthly services 328.63 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 03/19/2020 101-1171-4320 Monthly services 81.62 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,243.98 CenturyLink 03/27/2020 700-7043-4310 Monhly Service 59.19 CenturyLink 59.19 CHINNOCK ERIC & ERIN 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 47.05 CHINNOCK ERIC & ERIN 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.79 CHINNOCK ERIC & ERIN 53.84 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 04/03/2020 101-1320-4350 Sanitizing products 94.32 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 94.32 CORE & MAIN LP 03/27/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 1,953.92 CORE & MAIN LP 03/27/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 335.76 CORE & MAIN LP 04/03/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 2,075.18 CORE & MAIN LP 4,364.86 Countryside Veterinary Clinic PLLC 03/19/2020 101-1260-4300 Vet Services 144.00 Countryside Veterinary Clinic PLLC 144.00 Crew2 03/20/2020 101-1250-3301 Permit Refund 30.36 Crew2 30.36 CUB FOODS 03/20/2020 101-1220-4350 Fire Department Supplies 48.54 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 3 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CUB FOODS 48.54 Dooling Ashley 04/03/2020 101-1807-3642 Class Cancellation 17.00 Dooling Ashley 17.00 Elsberry Ruth 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 37.00 Elsberry Ruth 37.00 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 03/20/2020 101-1220-4070 2020 Quarterly Payment for Fire Department admin 9,150.00 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 9,150.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 04/03/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 1,040.68 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 1,040.68 Ferraro Steve 04/03/2020 101-1320-4240 Clothing Allowance 125.00 Ferraro Steve 04/03/2020 101-1310-4370 Travel to Training 108.10 Ferraro Steve 233.10 Fox Candyce 03/19/2020 101-1539-3631 Pickleball Lesson #4202.100 45.00 Fox Candyce 45.00 Frantz Shirley 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 13.00 Frantz Shirley 13.00 Freeland Jake 03/20/2020 101-1560-4300 Class 1 - Make Your Phone Your Friend 75.00 Freeland Jake 75.00 Gillis Geri 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 58.00 Gillis Geri 58.00 GOETZINGER LORETTA 03/19/2020 101-1539-3631 Fit for Life #4201.100 40.00 GOETZINGER LORETTA 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 withdraw 30.00 GOETZINGER LORETTA 70.00 Greystone Construction Co.03/27/2020 400-0000-4510 Repair on salt shed 15,950.00 Greystone Construction Co.03/27/2020 101-1320-4510 Repair on Salt shed 2,740.00 Greystone Construction Co. 18,690.00 Groenewold Michael 04/03/2020 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Groenewold Michael 100.00 Hand Marg 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 4 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Hand Marg 12.00 Harwood Helen 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Harwood Helen 12.00 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 720-0000-2012 April - Single 1,962.42 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 101-0000-2012 April - Family 32,812.69 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 101-0000-2012 April - Family- cobra 1,582.10 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 210-0000-2012 April - Family- cobra 395.53 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 700-0000-2012 April - Family 4,509.01 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 701-0000-2012 April - Family 4,509.01 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 720-0000-2012 April - Family 2,072.56 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 101-0000-2012 April - Single 17,820.10 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 210-0000-2012 April - Single 633.04 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 700-0000-2012 April - Single 2,769.54 HealthPartners, Inc.03/19/2020 701-0000-2012 April - Single 1,503.46 HealthPartners, Inc. 70,569.46 Hendricks Minette 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 13.00 Hendricks Minette 13.00 Hing Lynda 03/19/2020 101-1806-3642 Indoor Golf #2202.118 19.00 Hing Lynda 19.00 Hornung Mark 03/27/2020 101-1539-3631 Pickeball Lesson Withdraw 15.00 Hornung Mark 15.00 Husby Gloria 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 13.00 Husby Gloria 13.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/26/2020 101-0000-2009 3/27/2020 ID#304303 1,102.07 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/26/2020 700-0000-2009 3/27/2020 ID#304303 152.52 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/26/2020 701-0000-2009 3/27/2020 ID#304303 152.49 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 03/26/2020 720-0000-2009 3/27/2020 ID#304303 201.25 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 1,608.33 Institute of Reading Development 03/20/2020 101-1531-3631 Summer Reading Program Cancellation 800.00 Institute of Reading Development 800.00 Jackett Molly 03/19/2020 101-1537-3631 Go Gymnastics 28.00 Jackett Molly 28.00 Jacobs Judy 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 24.00 Jacobs Judy 24.00 Jaenicke Emmy 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 5 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Jaenicke Emmy 12.00 JANECKY PLUMBING INC 04/03/2020 101-0000-2033 Overpayment on permit #2020-00597 22.50 JANECKY PLUMBING INC 04/03/2020 101-0000-2033 Overpayment on permit #2020-00592 22.50 JANECKY PLUMBING INC 45.00 Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP 04/03/2020 400-4003-4706 Fire Alarm Material 5,515.00 Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP 5,515.00 Johnson Don 03/27/2020 101-1220-4300 Department Drop Box Account 12.87 Johnson Don 12.87 Johnson Jerre 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 22.00 Johnson Jerre 22.00 Johnson MaryAnn 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Johnson MaryAnn 12.00 Kapaun Pat 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 22.00 Kapaun Pat 22.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 03/27/2020 605-6501-4300 Hwy 101 - Right of Way 6,978.71 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 6,978.71 Keyworth Kathy 04/03/2020 720-7204-4901 Waterwise Rebate 100.00 Keyworth Kathy 100.00 KJORNESS LIEF & KELLY 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.50 KJORNESS LIEF & KELLY 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.00 KJORNESS LIEF & KELLY 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 32.78 KJORNESS LIEF & KELLY 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.09 KJORNESS LIEF & KELLY 61.37 Krantz Nancy 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Class Withdraw 44.00 Krantz Nancy 44.00 Landsberger Janeen 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 22.00 Landsberger Janeen 22.00 Lano Equipment 04/03/2020 400-0000-4705 Equipment 4,485.00 Lano Equipment 4,485.00 LARSON LORRELLE 03/20/2020 101-1212-4350 Cleaning Supplies 41.53 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 6 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount LARSON LORRELLE 41.53 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 03/19/2020 101-1560-4300 Piano Tuning Service 101.00 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 101.00 Lawson Products, Inc.03/27/2020 101-1550-4120 paint 51.72 Lawson Products, Inc. 51.72 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 03/19/2020 101-1170-4483 Insurance 1,614.89 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 1,614.89 LEE JOHANNA 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.46 LEE JOHANNA 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.90 LEE JOHANNA 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.79 LEE JOHANNA 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.80 LEE JOHANNA 26.95 Lee Nikki 03/19/2020 101-1806-3642 Indoor Golf #2202.118 19.00 Lee Nikki 19.00 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.09 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.80 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.15 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.29 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.08 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 17.85 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.28 LEGACY TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.44 LEGACY TITLE 60.98 LIBENGOOD BRENT & JACQUELINE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 354.29 LIBENGOOD BRENT & JACQUELINE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 635.52 LIBENGOOD BRENT & JACQUELINE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 93.34 LIBENGOOD BRENT & JACQUELINE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.81 LIBENGOOD BRENT & JACQUELINE 1,094.96 Livingston Shirley 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Livingston Shirley 12.00 Lube Tech ESI 04/03/2020 101-1370-4170 Parts 218.06 Lube Tech ESI 218.06 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 03/27/2020 101-1220-4130 Medical Supplies 149.97 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 03/27/2020 101-1220-4130 Medical Supplies 13.66 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 04/03/2020 101-1220-4130 Medical Supplies 62.42 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 7 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 226.05 MELLBERG TREVOR & JESSICA 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 37.15 MELLBERG TREVOR & JESSICA 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 30.31 MELLBERG TREVOR & JESSICA 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.43 MELLBERG TREVOR & JESSICA 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.46 MELLBERG TREVOR & JESSICA 76.35 Metro Garage Door Company 03/19/2020 101-1550-4300 garage door work - public works 755.37 Metro Garage Door Company 04/03/2020 101-1220-4510 Commercial Service- Motor Repair 175.95 Metro Garage Door Company 931.32 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.47 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 20.16 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.85 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.33 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.53 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.52 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.33 MINNESOTA TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.65 MINNESOTA TITLE 77.84 MINNETONKA TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.85 MINNETONKA TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 45.75 MINNETONKA TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.25 MINNETONKA TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.16 MINNETONKA TITLE 79.01 Minuteman Press 03/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Business Cards 32.00 Minuteman Press 03/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Business Cards 16.00 Minuteman Press 48.00 Mitchell Marilyn 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 13.00 Mitchell Marilyn 13.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 03/20/2020 700-0000-4370 Brett Martinson 23.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 03/20/2020 700-0000-4370 Joseph Gillen 23.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH 46.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.04/03/2020 101-1220-4360 MSFCA Membership - Becki White 60.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. 60.00 Molvig Mary 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 17.00 Molvig Mary 17.00 NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY 03/19/2020 400-0000-4751 grate 167.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 8 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY 167.00 Nielsen-Eckstein Helen 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Nielsen-Eckstein Helen 12.00 Paint,Paper, Scissors 03/19/2020 101-1565-4300 Memory Cafe Program 300.00 Paint,Paper, Scissors 300.00 Parker Dr. Marcie 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 22.00 Parker Dr. Marcie 22.00 Parvataneni Yuvan 04/03/2020 101-1807-3642 Class Cancellation 17.00 Parvataneni Yuvan 17.00 Paulsen Carole 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 13.00 Paulsen Carole 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 13.00 Paulsen Carole 26.00 Pitney Bowes Inc.03/19/2020 700-0000-4530 Postage meter 307.16 Pitney Bowes Inc.03/19/2020 701-0000-4530 Postage meter 307.16 Pitney Bowes Inc.03/19/2020 720-0000-4530 Postage meter 307.16 Pitney Bowes Inc.03/19/2020 101-1120-4410 Postage meter 105.00 Pitney Bowes Inc. 1,026.48 POSTMASTER 03/20/2020 700-0000-4330 Utility Postage 317.17 POSTMASTER 03/20/2020 701-0000-4330 Utility Postage 317.17 POSTMASTER 634.34 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 719 Wildflower Lane 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 700 Maggie Way 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 702 Maggie Way 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 704 Maggie Way 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 706 Maggie Way 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 708 Maggie Way 416.66 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 710 Maggie Way 416.66 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 712 Maggie Way 416.66 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 714 Maggie Way 416.66 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 716 Maggie Way 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 718 Maggie Way 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 720 Maggie Way 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 722 Maggie Way 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 724 Maggie Way 300.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 726 Maggie Way 300.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 728 Maggie Way 300.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 730 Maggie Way 300.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 732 Maggie Way 300.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 765 Stonegate Rd 416.65 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 763 Stonegate Rd 416.67 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 9 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 761 Stonegate Rd 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 759 Stonegate Rd 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 757 Stonegate Rd 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 755 Stonegate Rd 416.67 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 721 Wildflower Lane 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 723 Wildflower Lane 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 725 Wildflower Lane 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 727 Wildflower Lane 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 731 Wildflower Lane 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 729 Wildflower Lane 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 707 Maggie Way 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 709 Maggie Way 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 711 Maggie Way 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 713 Maggie Way 625.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 715 Maggie Way 500.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 717 Maggie Way 500.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 719 Maggie Way 500.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 721 Maggie Way 500.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 723 Maggie Way 500.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 725 Maggie Way 375.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 727 Maggie Way 375.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 729 Maggie Way 375.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 731 Maggie Way 375.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 760 Stonegate Road 1.00 Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC 19,876.00 Ranz Patricia 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 24.00 Ranz Patricia 24.00 RECYCLING ASSOCIATION OF MN 04/03/2020 720-7202-4360 Recycling Association of MN membership 300.00 RECYCLING ASSOCIATION OF MN 300.00 Renewal By Anderson 04/03/2020 101-1250-3301 Cancellation 165.72 Renewal By Anderson 165.72 RESULT TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.66 RESULT TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.27 RESULT TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.97 RESULT TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.43 RESULT TITLE 23.33 Rishavy Michael 03/20/2020 101-1560-3637 Refund for driver refresher course 40.00 Rishavy Michael 40.00 ROPER DONALD 03/27/2020 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow- 2509 W 77th Street 250.00 ROPER DONALD 250.00 Rouch Jeanne 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 10 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Rouch Jeanne 12.00 SEH 03/27/2020 701-7052-4751 Project 19-06 I&I 4,583.50 SEH 4,583.50 Senja Inc 03/19/2020 101-1539-4300 Rec Center Classes 246.40 Senja Inc 246.40 Shadywood Tree Experts and Landscaping 04/03/2020 720-7202-4300 Park Pruning 18,836.25 Shadywood Tree Experts and Landscaping 18,836.25 Shaw Kelly 03/19/2020 101-1806-3642 Indoor Golf #2202.118 19.00 Shaw Kelly 19.00 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 03/20/2020 101-1170-4260 Sanitze, Hammer Products 21.48 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 03/20/2020 101-1190-4510 Salt, Caulk 33.95 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 55.43 Sicard Janis 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Sicard Janis 12.00 SIGNSOURCE 03/27/2020 101-1220-4120 FF Helmet Graphics 800.00 SIGNSOURCE 03/27/2020 101-1550-4300 Service Message Center Sign 125.00 SIGNSOURCE 04/03/2020 701-0000-4150 Reflective Hazard Vinyl 1,307.50 SIGNSOURCE 2,232.50 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 04/03/2020 400-1212-4703 Webroot Software Anywhere Clients 135.20 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 04/03/2020 101-1160-4220 Adobe Creative Cloud Renewals 1,836.14 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 1,971.34 South Central College 03/20/2020 101-1220-4370 Fire School 480.00 South Central College 480.00 Spahr Sandra 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Spahr Sandra 12.00 Sullivan Patricia 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Sullivan Patricia 12.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 03/27/2020 400-0000-1155 The Park 2nd 35.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 03/27/2020 700-0000-4300 Public Works 45.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 80.00 TITLE CHOICE LLC 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 54.11 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 11 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount TITLE CHOICE LLC 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.86 TITLE CHOICE LLC 56.97 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.16 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.61 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.59 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.44 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES 14.80 Triethart DeeAnn 03/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Advil for medicine box 9.99 Triethart DeeAnn 9.99 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 03/19/2020 700-0000-4370 Jacob Casebeer - HazMat Professional Training 225.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 225.00 Vanek Pamela 04/03/2020 101-1612-3630 Easter Egg Hunt Cancellation 10.00 Vanek Pamela 10.00 Walker Martha 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Withdraw 12.00 Walker Martha 12.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 03/20/2020 101-1220-4300 Main Fire Station Waste Services 297.26 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 297.26 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 55.77 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.84 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 64.06 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 116.78 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 14.83 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 254.28 WEICHERT NATIONAL TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.17 WEICHERT NATIONAL TITLE 03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.82 WEICHERT NATIONAL TITLE 03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.42 WEICHERT NATIONAL TITLE 03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.27 WEICHERT NATIONAL TITLE 10.68 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 27.11 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.03/27/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 62.58 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.03/27/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.47 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.03/27/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.20 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. 114.36 Wetzel Dena 03/27/2020 101-1560-3637 Class Withdraw 33.00 Wetzel Dena 33.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 12 of 13 Name Check Da Account Description Amount WING RICHARD 04/03/2020 101-1220-4350 February 2020 Service 100.00 WING RICHARD 100.00 190,835.78 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (04/03/2020 - 2:01 PM)Page 13 of 13 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 04/03/2020 - 2:00 PM Name Check Da Account Description Amount 3D SPECIALTIES 04/03/2020 101-1320-4240 PPE 227.86 3D SPECIALTIES 227.86 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 03/19/2020 101-1220-4510 electrical service 138.66 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 138.66 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 03/27/2020 101-1170-4300 Monthly Service 131.25 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 131.25 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 03/27/2020 101-0000-2008 March 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 Apadana LLC 03/19/2020 400-0000-4706 Lighting 1,525.68 Apadana LLC 03/19/2020 400-0000-4706 Lighting 795.00 Apadana LLC 03/19/2020 400-0000-4706 Lighting Material 1,120.00 Apadana LLC 03/19/2020 400-0000-4706 Lighting Project 23,774.16 Apadana LLC 27,214.84 Barr Engineering Company 03/27/2020 700-0000-4300 Professional Services 10,000.00 Barr Engineering Company 10,000.00 BATTERIES PLUS 03/19/2020 701-0000-4530 Battery 80.99 BATTERIES PLUS 04/03/2020 701-0000-4150 Batteries 87.10 BATTERIES PLUS 168.09 BENSON KAYE L 03/27/2020 101-1539-4300 Fit for Life Instructor Payment 392.00 BENSON KAYE L 392.00 BROADWAY AWARDS 03/27/2020 101-1170-4110 Name Tag 66.21 BROADWAY AWARDS 66.21 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 03/20/2020 101-1140-4302 Legal Services 12,349.02 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 12,349.02 Carver County 03/19/2020 410-0000-4710 Project ST-033 - CSAH 61 Improvements 202,902.90 Carver County 03/19/2020 601-6045-4300 PW-31a - Pedestrian Improvements CSAH 17 13,924.40 Carver County 03/19/2020 101-1210-4300 Investigation on Liquor License 100.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/03/2020 - 2:00 PM)Page 1 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Carver County 04/03/2020 101-1130-4301 Tax Charges 711.50 Carver County 04/03/2020 101-1210-4300 Liquor License - Lifetime Fitness 100.00 Carver County 217,738.80 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 03/27/2020 101-0000-2008 March Insurance 60.72 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 03/27/2020 700-0000-2008 March Insurance 19.22 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 03/27/2020 701-0000-2008 March Insurance 19.22 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 99.16 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.04/03/2020 101-1160-4220 SSL Certification - Cartegraph App Server 160.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.04/03/2020 101-1160-4220 OMS Security Certificate Renewal 160.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.04/03/2020 101-1160-4220 VM Production Hosts HW/SW Renewals 4,562.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 4,882.00 Cues, Inc.03/27/2020 701-0000-4551 Parts 134.74 Cues, Inc. 134.74 Delta Dental 03/27/2020 101-0000-2013 April 1,735.40 Delta Dental 03/27/2020 700-0000-2013 April 294.20 Delta Dental 03/27/2020 701-0000-2013 April 264.00 Delta Dental 03/27/2020 720-0000-2013 April 183.80 Delta Dental 2,477.40 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 04/03/2020 101-1220-4140 Engine 211 Service 516.11 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 516.11 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/27/2020 101-1320-4140 Parts 26.25 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/27/2020 700-0000-4120 Parts 16.40 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/27/2020 101-1370-4120 Parts 24.56 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/27/2020 701-0000-4240 Safety Equipment 507.57 FASTENAL COMPANY 03/27/2020 700-0000-4550 parts 112.20 FASTENAL COMPANY 686.98 Fidelity Security Life 03/20/2020 101-0000-2007 April 2020 Vision 172.27 Fidelity Security Life 03/20/2020 700-0000-2007 April 2020 Vision 13.49 Fidelity Security Life 03/20/2020 701-0000-2007 April 2020 Vision 13.47 Fidelity Security Life 03/20/2020 720-0000-2007 April 2020 Vision 14.24 Fidelity Security Life 213.47 GS DIRECT INC 03/27/2020 101-1310-4340 Paper 20.00 GS DIRECT INC 20.00 Health Strategies 03/19/2020 101-1220-4300 Services 415.00 Health Strategies 415.00 Hoops & Threads LLC 03/20/2020 701-0000-4240 Custom Embroidery 22.50 Hoops & Threads LLC 03/20/2020 700-0000-4240 Custom Embroidery 22.50 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/03/2020 - 2:00 PM)Page 2 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Hoops & Threads LLC 45.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 102.78 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/19/2020 400-4003-4706 Fire Dept Remodel 13,637.60 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 84.02 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 81.53 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies -62.10 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/19/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies -63.99 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 03/27/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 17.28 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 04/03/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 25.84 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 13,822.96 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 03/19/2020 101-1190-4510 Valve 108.94 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 03/19/2020 101-1190-4510 Valve -99.55 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 03/27/2020 101-1190-4510 Parts 111.25 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 120.64 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 03/19/2020 101-1370-4170 Grease 162.85 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 03/27/2020 101-1370-4170 Fuel 8,211.69 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 8,374.54 Kidd Plumbing Inc 03/19/2020 101-1190-4530 Service 740.50 Kidd Plumbing Inc 740.50 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/19/2020 601-6046-4752 2020 Pavement Rehab 22,620.88 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 03/19/2020 601-6043-4752 City Project # 2020-02 - Minnewashta Parkway Rehab 21,980.65 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 44,601.53 Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc.03/19/2020 101-1190-4510 Replacing film/lens in Light Fixtures 80.50 Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc. 80.50 Macqueen Emergengy Group 04/03/2020 101-1220-4290 Class A foam 1,150.00 Macqueen Emergengy Group 1,150.00 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 04/03/2020 101-1140-4302 January 2020 Legal Services 897.34 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 897.34 Maus Kerry 03/19/2020 101-1539-4300 Class 4201.111 168.75 Maus Kerry 168.75 Minnesota Equipment 03/19/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 1,055.75 Minnesota Equipment 03/19/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts Return -598.83 Minnesota Equipment 03/19/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts Return 598.83 Minnesota Equipment 1,055.75 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 03/19/2020 101-1170-4300 ELV03544 100.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/03/2020 - 2:00 PM)Page 3 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 03/19/2020 101-1190-4300 Boiler 20.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 120.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/19/2020 101-1350-4320 County Rd 61 & St Hwy 101 Lights 234.16 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 03/20/2020 101-1350-4320 Bluff Crk & Flying Cloud Dr 126.81 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthy Service 28.19 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 04/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthy Service 146.64 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 535.80 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/27/2020 101-1370-4705 Tire Changer Adapter 890.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/27/2020 101-1550-4120 Parts 97.67 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/27/2020 101-1550-4140 Brake Pads 83.31 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/27/2020 700-0000-4140 Vehicle Supplies 72.27 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 03/27/2020 101-1220-4140 Vehicle Supplies 56.30 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 1,199.55 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 03/20/2020 101-1110-4340 Connection Newsletter 7,246.22 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 03/20/2020 101-1120-4330 Postage 1,879.84 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 04/03/2020 101-1170-4110 Envelopes 1,033.68 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 10,159.74 On-Site Medical Services Inc 03/27/2020 700-0000-4300 Medical Questionnaire 70.00 On-Site Medical Services Inc 70.00 OPG-3, Inc 03/27/2020 400-4117-4703 Laserfiche Add on Full User Renewals 450.00 OPG-3, Inc 450.00 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 04/03/2020 101-1220-4140 Parts 186.23 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 04/03/2020 101-1320-4140 Parts return -8.94 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 04/03/2020 101-1220-4120 Parts 54.24 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 04/03/2020 101-1250-4140 Parts return -148.80 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 04/03/2020 101-1250-4140 Parts 148.80 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 04/03/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts return -12.33 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 04/03/2020 101-1250-4140 Parts 148.80 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 368.00 Pedretti Christine Lea 04/03/2020 101-1539-4300 Yoga Instruction 79.95 Pedretti Christine Lea 79.95 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 03/20/2020 101-1220-4140 Tires 1,289.38 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 1,289.38 RBM SERVICES INC 03/19/2020 101-1170-4350 Nightly Janitorial 3,583.37 RBM SERVICES INC 03/19/2020 101-1170-4350 Nightly Janitorial 3,471.10 RBM SERVICES INC 7,054.47 Safe-Fast, Inc.03/27/2020 101-1550-4120 Jacket 449.70 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/03/2020 - 2:00 PM)Page 4 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Safe-Fast, Inc. 449.70 SPS COMPANIES INC 03/27/2020 101-1170-4510 Parts 9.37 SPS COMPANIES INC 04/03/2020 101-1220-4510 Parts 103.61 SPS Companies Inc 03/19/2020 101-1170-4510 Parts 6.43 SPS Companies Inc 119.41 STRATOGUARD LLC 03/27/2020 101-1160-4300 Proofpoint Email Filtering Srvc - March 176.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 176.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 03/20/2020 101-1550-4140 Parts 503.70 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 503.70 TBEI, Inc 03/19/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts 655.44 TBEI, Inc 655.44 United Farmers Cooperative 03/20/2020 101-1550-4120 Parks Blower 31.45 United Farmers Cooperative 31.45 UNITED WAY 03/26/2020 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00427.03.2020 United Way 30.40 UNITED WAY 30.40 USA BLUE BOOK 03/20/2020 700-0000-4530 Stainer Gasket 26.96 USA BLUE BOOK 04/03/2020 700-0000-4260 Tools 686.02 USA BLUE BOOK 712.98 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1220-4310 Cell Phone 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1550-4310 Cell Phone 987.70 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1520-4310 Cell Phone 42.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1600-4310 Cell Phone 130.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1530-4310 Cell Phone 42.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 700-0000-4310 Cell Phone 546.42 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 701-0000-4310 Cell Phone 393.36 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 720-0000-4310 Cell Phone 65.55 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1160-4310 Cell Phone 95.30 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1120-4310 Cell Phone 265.69 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1170-4310 Cell Phone 25.23 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1260-4310 Cell Phone 35.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1130-4310 Cell Phone 25.68 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1250-4310 Cell Phone 292.38 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1310-4310 Cell Phone 174.79 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1370-4310 Cell Phone 93.11 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1320-4310 Cell Phone 321.48 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-1220-4310 Cell Phone 505.42 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/03/2020 101-0000-2033 Cell Phone 11.49 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,094.57 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/03/2020 - 2:00 PM)Page 5 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount VESSCO INC 03/19/2020 700-7019-4530 Parts 3,475.00 VESSCO INC 04/03/2020 700-7019-4530 Parts 3,475.00 VESSCO INC 6,950.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 04/03/2020 720-0000-4300 Buff Regulation Review 408.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 408.75 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/19/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Services 40.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/19/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Services 2,551.54 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 330.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 1,982.90 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 700-7019-4320 Monthly Service 2,449.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 290.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 101-1170-4320 Monthly Service 395.87 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 101-1190-4320 Monthly Service 274.49 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 101-1220-4320 Monthly Service 878.95 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 101-1370-4320 Monthly Service 1,406.34 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 101-1171-4320 Monthly Service 17.47 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Service 175.79 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthly Service 175.80 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/27/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Service 688.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/20/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Services 290.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/20/2020 700-7043-4320 Monthly Services 5,111.68 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/20/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Services 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/20/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Services -10.19 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/20/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Services 15.97 XCEL ENERGY INC 03/20/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthly Services 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 701-0000-4320 Monthy Services - Lift Stations -2,542.79 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthy Services - Lift Stations -639.13 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Lift Stations 392.84 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthy Services - 7599 Minnewashta Pkwy -4.65 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthy Services - Street Lights 88.06 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Street Lights 28.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthy Services - Street Lights 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Street Lights 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Street Lights 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthy Services - Street Lights 11.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthy Services - Street Lights 17.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Street Lights 28.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthy Services - Water Tower 60.64 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Water Tower 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthy Services - Parks 13.19 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Parks 14.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1540-4320 Monthy Services - Parks 310.64 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthy Services - Parks 263.74 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1550-4320 Monthy Services - Parks 4.60 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Parks 388.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthy Services - Street Lights 18,633.89 XCEL ENERGY INC 04/03/2020 601-0000-3080 Monthy Services - Street Lights 392.00 XCEL ENERGY INC 34,604.92 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/03/2020 - 2:00 PM)Page 6 of 7 Name Check Da Account Description Amount 419,033.09 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (04/03/2020 - 2:00 PM)Page 7 of 7 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, April 13, 2020 Subject 2020 Building Permit Activity March Year To Date Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: I.5. Prepared By File No:  ATTACHMENTS: 2020 Building Permit Activity March YTD 2020 Building Permit Activity Milrch YTDCity of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 9s2-227-1100 2727Residential Single-Family 00Residential Townhomes 00Apartments/Senior Facilities 2727Total Residential 00New 00Redeveloped 99Remodeled 99Total Commercial 156Single-Family Lots 24Residential Townhome Lots 180Total Available Lots 40 274944855Single-Family 0 18 0t2560Townhomes 0 0 0026876Apartmentsi Senior Facilities 57 96758109Commercial 36t7115233t34431Total Number of All Permits \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\admin\forms\building permit activity 2020 yd.doc Residential Building Permits 1't Quarter 2nd Quarter 3'd Quarter YTD 4th Quarter Total YTD Commercial Building Permits l't Quarter 2nd Quarter 3'd Quarter YTD 4th Quarter Total YTD Available Lot lnventory (end of Ouarter)1't Quarter 2nd Quarter 3'd Quarter YTI)4th Quarter Total Permit History 2016 2017 2018 l" Qt. 2019 2019 2020 l3 2020 4t612020 BUILDING PERMIT DATA 2020 Its ANUARY FFBRTIARY MARCH APRIL Subtotals Sstion I R6idotial SF I,ETACI{ED l0t s 9 9 t5 t5 l5 $5,424,000 3 -l l $r.606,000 21 21 27 SF ANAC}IED 2-FAMil-Y t 0.'l 0 0 0 $ r04 5 OR MORE FAtr''LY 105 0 0 0 $ il Subtobl 109 9 I 9 $4.037,000 I5 t5 l5 $5-424-000 -l l l $r.606,000 $0 $0 SO 27 etion 2 R6idqtial,llq HOTELS/MOTELS 2t3 ITHER 214 0 0 0 $ Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 0 Section I Nonr6idtrtial 0Amusment hurche 319 0 0 $ lndustial 320 321 0 0 0 $ Swice Station/Repair 322 0 0 0 HosDibl/lnstitutional 323 $ Offi c6/Bilks/Prof6sional 324 0 0 0 $ Public works 32s 0 0 0 $ Schools 326 0 Sto16 \2',7 0 0 0Oths328 $ 661.000 SEudur6 o(h6 thd bldg.329 I $t57.000 2 s483.000 3 $2 r ,000 6 0 0 $ 661,000 Subtobl I $t57.000 2 $483.000 _3 $2 |,000 $0 $0 $0 S@tion 4 Additions t47 0 R6idential 434 26 26 $53 r.400 40 .10 $726.000 8t 8l $t.245,000 $561.000Nofi6idotial43722$r05.000 2 2 $23,000 5 $4.3I,000 9 g 0 $ 25,000 Garag6 4-18 I I $25-000 subtotal 28 28 s6-16-400 4,3 4-l $774.000 86 86 $r.678.000 $0 $0 s0 r57 t57 0 $ 3.088,400 S(tion 5 Dmolition s SF Amched 645 I I 0 I I 3-4 fanilv 647 0 0 0 $ 5 or more fmily 648 I 0 0 $649 I I I Subtotal I I $0 $0 I $o s0 $0 $0 I TOTALS _18 38 t0 $4,830.400 60 58 t5 s6-68t -000 9l 8 l $1.-105.000 $0 $0 $0 l9l t85 SF DETACHED $448.s56 s36r,600 $5ls.ll3 #DM0l #Drv/o!#DIV/O! SF ATTACHED #Dtv/0!#DIV/O!#DIV/O!#Dtv/0!#Dry/o!#DM0! 2,FAMILY #DIV/O!#Dtv/0!#Dtv/01 dDlv/0!#Dw/01 #Dlv/0! i.4 FAMILY #DIV/O!#DM0!#Dlv/01 #Dtv/0!#Dtv/0!#DM0l 5 OR MORE FAMILY #DM0l #DMol #DM0!#DM0!#Drv/o!#Drv/0! $448.ss6 s16t 600 $535.333 #Dtv/0!#DMo!#Dtv/0! \\cfss\cfs5\shared_Data\PLAN\cENSUS\RPT 2020 I f il 067 00f I I I I ,rkinr I I ( I I I I