Agenda and PacketAGENDA
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2020
CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD
A.5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION
Note: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work
session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular
agenda.
1.Discuss Paisley Park PUD Amendment
2.Yard Waste Collection Update
3.Discuss 2020 Key Financial Strategies and Legislative Priorities
4.Discuss Early 2021 Budget Estimates
B.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)
C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
D.CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and
will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If
discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered
separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the
council packet for each staff report.
1.Approve City Council Minutes dated January 27, 2020
2.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 21, 2020
3.Approve a Request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for the Purpose of Repairing
Landslides Along A Portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail
4.Resolution 2020XX: Providing for the Sale of up to $7,000,000 General Obligation
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A for various City 2020 and 2021 Utility System
Improvements.
5.Resolution 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Approve Plans and Specifications;
Authorize Ad for Bids
6.Well #4 Roof Repair
7.Highway 101 RPBCWD Maintenance Agreement
AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:00 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Discuss Paisley Park PUD Amendment2.Yard Waste Collection Update3.Discuss 2020 Key Financial Strategies and Legislative Priorities4.Discuss Early 2021 Budget EstimatesB.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated January 27, 20202.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 21, 20203.Approve a Request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for the Purpose of RepairingLandslides Along A Portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail4.Resolution 2020XX: Providing for the Sale of up to $7,000,000 General ObligationUtility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A for various City 2020 and 2021 Utility SystemImprovements.5.Resolution 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Approve Plans and Specifications;Authorize Ad for Bids6.Well #4 Roof Repair
7.Highway 101 RPBCWD Maintenance Agreement
E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and
submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)
1.Stormwater Pond Phosphorous Remediation Study
F.OLD BUSINESS
1.Resolution 2020XX: Adoption of 2040 Comprehensive Plan
G.PUBLIC HEARINGS
H.NEW BUSINESS
I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION
1.CDA Community and Economic Development Update 01152020
2.Open to Business Carver County Update 12312019
3.Review of Claims Paid 02102020
4.2020 Building Permit Activity January Year To Date
L.ADJOURNMENT
M.GUIDELINES
GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City
Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided
at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.
Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to
complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at
https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to
the meeting.
Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When
called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City
Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City
Council.
If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson
that can summarize the issue.
Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you
have written comments, provide a copy to the Council.
During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion.
Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding
of your concern, suggestion or request.
AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:00 P.M. WORK SESSIONNote: Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Discuss Paisley Park PUD Amendment2.Yard Waste Collection Update3.Discuss 2020 Key Financial Strategies and Legislative Priorities4.Discuss Early 2021 Budget EstimatesB.7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated January 27, 20202.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 21, 20203.Approve a Request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for the Purpose of RepairingLandslides Along A Portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail4.Resolution 2020XX: Providing for the Sale of up to $7,000,000 General ObligationUtility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A for various City 2020 and 2021 Utility SystemImprovements.5.Resolution 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Approve Plans and Specifications;Authorize Ad for Bids6.Well #4 Roof Repair7.Highway 101 RPBCWD Maintenance AgreementE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)1.Stormwater Pond Phosphorous Remediation StudyF.OLD BUSINESS1.Resolution 2020XX: Adoption of 2040 Comprehensive PlanG.PUBLIC HEARINGSH.NEW BUSINESSI.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSJ.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONSK.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION1.CDA Community and Economic Development Update 011520202.Open to Business Carver County Update 123120193.Review of Claims Paid 021020204.2020 Building Permit Activity January Year To DateL.ADJOURNMENTM.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONSWelcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen CityCouncil wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is providedat every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required tocomplete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available athttps://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior tothe meeting.Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. Whencalled upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the CityCouncil as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the CityCouncil.If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokespersonthat can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If youhave written comments, provide a copy to the Council.During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion.Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding
of your concern, suggestion or request.
Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual
either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City
Manager.
Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen
immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Discuss Paisley Park PUD Amendment
Section 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.1.
Prepared By MacKenzie YoungWalters, Associate
Planner
File No:
SUMMARY
During the work session on January 27, 2020, the City Council instructed staff to draft language amending Paisley
Park’s Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinance to allow for additional flexibility in the number and types of events
held at Paisley Park. Staff is proposing language that would allow Paisley Park to hold an unlimited number of indoor
events with 200 or less attendees and one outdoor event per calendar year, subject to the requirements of the city’s
special event ordinance.
If the City Council directs staff to pursue the amendment, it would go before the Planning Commission for a Public
Hearing on March 17, 2020 before returning to the Council for a final vote on April 13, 2020.
A full discussion of the proposed amendment can be found in the attached staff report.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is requesting the City Council provide direction on desirability of the proposed PUD amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report
Paisley Park Proposed Amendment
Special Events Ordinance
CITY OF CHAI'IHASSIN
Chanhassen is a Community for Life- Providing for Today and planning for Tomonow
MEMORANDUM
TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager
FROM:Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
Don Johnson, Fire Chief
MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner
DATE: February 10,2020
SUBJ:Paisley Park Events Amendment
During the work session on January 27,2020, the City Council instructed staff to draft language
amending Paisley Park's Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinance to allow for additional
flexibility in the number and types ofevents held at Paisley Park. Staffis proposing language
that would allow Paisley Park to hold an unlimited number of indoor events with 200 or less
attendees and one outdoor event per calendar year, subject to the requirements ofthe city's
special event ordinance. A full discussion ofeach proposed change can be found below.
If the City Council directs saffto pursue the amendment, it would go before the Planning
Commission for a Public Hearing on March 17, 2020 before renming to the Council for a final
vote on April 13,2020.
On October 24, 2016, the Chanhassen City Council approved Ordinance 616 that rezoned
Paisley Park from Industrial Office Park (lOP) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). Ordinance
616 allowed for the use ofthe site as a museum and recording studio with accessory sales and up
to 12 indoor concerts per calendar year. Both alcohol sales and outdoor events were listed as
prohibited uses within the PUD.
On January 8, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council approved Ordinance 630 amending the PUD
to allow for alcohol to be sold fiom January 29, 2018 through February 5, 2018.
On January 14,2019, the Chanhassen City Council approved Ordinance 638 amending the PUD
to allow for alcohol sales in conjunction with a temporary event permit.
On January 27,2020, the Chanhassen City Council discussed the potential for amending the
PUD to allow for additional events.
PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110
77OO MARKEI BOULEVARD . PO BOX I47 . CHANHASSEN . MINNESOTA 55317
SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
Todd Gerhardt
Paisley Park Events Amendment
February 10,2020
Page 2
DISCUSSION
Note: In the following section, text in bold is new language and text in sdketh+eugh is deleted
language.
Change l: Indoor Events wilh over 200 attendees
Staff is proposing amending the indoor concert provision to read:
Permitted Uses:
Twelve ( l2) indoor eonee*ts events with over 200 attendees per calendar year.
An eeneetr event-specific seating plan and temporary event permit must be
filed with the city at least ten (10) days in advance ofeach event eenee+.-Aleehel
ir.
These changes would mean that only indoor events with over 200 attendees would require a
temporary event permit. Last year only six ofPaisley Park's events exceeded 200 attendees,
which means exempting smaller events from the event cap will gant them the ability to host
twice as many larger events per year going forward. Staff believes that the building's A-3
occupancy justifies maintaining a cap on the number of larger events held in the building each
year. Staff does not believe that any regulation of liquor sales beyond what is provided for by
general liquor laws is required and is subsequently recommending removal ofthe language
requiring a temporary event pennit to serve alcohol.
Change 2: Indoor Events with less thqn 200 attendees.
Staff is proposing amending the private event provision to read
Permitted Uses:
Private events with 200 or less attendees. @
The proposed changes would make it clear that private events with 200 or less attendees are a
permitted use within the PUD. Language requiring the filing ofan event specific seating plan
with the city was removed at the request ofthe Fire Chiel who did not believe any fire safety
provisions beyond what are ordinarily required were necessary for events of this scale. The
proposed changes would allow Paisley Park to host as many small events as they wanted
throughout the year, with or without alcohol. Historically, there have no complaints or issues
with these small events and staff does not believe it is necessary to require a temporary event
permit for indoor events that can be entirely accommodated on site.
)
4.
Todd Gerhardt
Paisley Park Events Amendment
February 10,2020
Page 3
Change 3: Outdoor Events
Staff is proposing amending the outdoor events provisions to read:
Permitted Uses:
One (l) outdoor event per calendar year. This event requires a special event
permit and is subject to all requirements of Section 20-964 of the City Code.
Prohibited Uses:
2-€utdeer-even+s-
The proposed changes would remove the existing prohibition on outdoor events and allow
Paisley Park one outdoor event per year. This event would need to meet all standards ofthe
city's special event ordinance and permitting process. Staff is proposing this change as a
mechanism to allow for a trial outdoor event. Ifthe event was successful, a subsequent
amendment could allow for additional events.
The city's special event ordinance contains provisions that allow staffto evaluate the impact a
proposed event will have upon traffic and surrounding properties, as well as application
requirements that include receiving all other relevant permits. For example, an outdoor event at
Paisley Park would also require a loudspeaker permit that would require that event noise be kept
at a reasonable level and that the use of sound amplification equipment cease by l0:00 p.m. The
special event ordinance also allows the city to impose conditions on a proposed event to mitigate
any potential negative impacts. The conditions could include the details ofa traffic and
pedestrian access plan, a limit on the maximum number ofaftendees, escrow requirements to
ensure the cleanup and restoration ofpublic property, the presence ofpublic safety personnel,
event screening, or any other conditions that the city determined was necessary to mitigate the
event's impact on traffic, parking, public safety. or other municipal services. Staffbelieves the
existing special event ordinance provides the best available framework for reviewing and
permitting an outdoor event at Paisley Park.
ALTERNATIVES
8
Staff is requesting City Council direction on desirability of the proposed PUD amendment.
I . Direct staff to bring the proposed changes before the Planning Commission for a Public
Hearing.
2. Direct staff to retum with an amended proposal.
3. Direct staff not to propose the PUD amendment.
Todd Gerhardt
Paisley Park Events Amendment
February 10,2020
Page 4
ATTACHMENTS
PUD Ordinance (with proposed amendments)
Event Ordinance
G:\PLAN\MW\Reference-Examples-Templates-Misc\Paisley Patk Even$2.docx
1
2
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 616
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE
CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE,
BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS:
Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is
amended by rezoning the following described property (“Subject Property”) to PUD, Planned Unit
Development:
Lot 11, Block 1, Chanhassen Lakes Business Park, Carver County, MN
Section 2. Paisley Park Planned Unit Development
a. Intent
The purpose of this rezoning is to create a PUD zoning district for Paisley Park. The uses,
development standards and regulations of the IOP, Industrial Office Park District shall
apply subject to the following modifications:
b. Permitted Uses. Only the following uses are permitted:
1. Museum.
2. Recording studio.
3. Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than
twenty percent (20%) of the floor space is used for retail sales. These sales may
include food, beverages and memorabilia.
4. Twelve (12) indoor concerts events with over 200 attendees per calendar year. An
concert event-specific seating plan and temporary event permit must be filed with
the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event concert. Alcohol may only be
served in conjunction with a Temporary Event Permit.
5. Private events with 200 or less attendees. An event-specific seating plan must be
filed with the City at least ten (10) days in advance of each event.
6. Office.
7. Multiple buildings on a lot.
8. One (1) outdoor event per calendar year, this event requires a special event
permit and is subject to all requirements of Section 20-964 of the City Code.
c. Conditional Uses. The following conditional use is permitted:
1. Hotel.
2
d. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited:
1. All conditional and permitted uses not listed as permitted or conditional uses.
2. Outdoor events.
e. Materials and Design
Fence:
Fences shall comply with City Code requirements including the Buffer Yard
requirements, except that fences may be opaque to provide security screening.
f. Development Plans and Regulations.
The PUD must be maintained in accordance with the following development plans which
are on file with the City and which are incorporated herein by reference:
1. Site Plan – SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Parking Study dated September 15, 2016,
Figure 5, Option 1, with a north access right-in for buses only and right-out only for
buses, and passenger vehicles.
2. The tent identified on the Site Plan may only be used for the sale of food, beverages
and memorabilia.
3. A hotel may only be in the round building on the Site Plan and may not exceed 35
guest rooms.
4. Site Improvement Performance Agreement approved by the Chanhassen City Council
on October 24, 2016.
5. Landscaping along the east side of Audubon Road is required and shall include roses,
junipers and barberry.
g. Parking
1. Parking lots and parking spaces shall comply with city code requirements.
2. If guests only arrive to the site by a shuttle bus the tour size shall be limited by the
maximum occupancy under the Fire Code.
3. Audubon Road must be striped to include a left turn lane into the southern access.
4. All required permits, including from the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed
District, must be obtained prior to installing the pavement.
5. The north access shall be limited to a right-in for buses only and right-out of the site
for buses and passenger vehicles.
3
6. The traffic signal at Highway 5 and Audubon Road must be optimized based on the
SRF study.
7. The number of guests allowed on the site shall be limited so that either (a) there are a
sufficient number of on-site parking spaces to accommodate guests who arrive by a
personal vehicle, or (b) guests arrive and depart by bus.
8. Until all parking requirements have been constructed, all access to the site shall be by
bus with the exception of employees, contractors and 40 guest cars per hour
maximum.
9. If the on-site parking is inadequate, the maximum allowable tour size shall be reduced
to a level where the on-site parking is sufficient, or the PUD and the site plan must be
amended to provide more parking or guests shall be bused to and from the site. Any
changes to the site plan are subject to review and approval by the City and other
agencies with regulatory authority over the site.
Section 3. The zoning map of the City of Chanhassen shall not be republished to show the
aforesaid zoning, but the Clerk shall appropriately mark the zoning map on file in the Clerk's Office
for the purpose of indicating the rezoning hereinabove provided for in this ordinance, and all of the
notations, references, and other information shown thereon are hereby incorporated by reference and
made a part of this ordinance.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this XX day of YY, 2020, by the City Council of the City of
Chanhassen, Minnesota.
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
(Published in the Chanhassen Villager on XX YY, 2020)
Sec. 20-964. - Temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events.
(1) Purpose. It is the intent of this section to provide for temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales,
seasonal sales and special events which are distinguished from permanent outside business
activities that are allowed only by conditional use permit or interim use permit approved by the city
council. It is the intent of this section to promote the health, safety, general welfare, aesthetics, and
image of the community by facilitating and regulating temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales,
seasonal sales and special events in the following manner:
a. Establish standards which permit businesses and organizations to conduct temporary outdoor
events, sidewalk sales and seasonal sales in zoning districts where they are permitted
accessory uses, and permit businesses, organizations, and individuals to sponsor special
events while:
1. Ensuring that temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events
do not create safety hazards by occupying required parking spaces, emergency access, by
impeding the efficient movement of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, or by placing an
excessive burden on city services.
2. Ensuring that appropriate and necessary insurances and licenses for temporary outdoor
events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events are obtained.
3. Providing open and transparent standards, guidelines, and procedures for an
administrative review of temporary events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special
events.
b. Allow temporary events and sidewalk sales which require an outdoor location, while providing
standards that will assure compatibility with the underlying zoning district and adjacent property
uses. These events and sidewalk sales can include, but are not limited to, product
demonstrations or promotions, employee or customer appreciation events, corporate
anniversary celebrations and grand openings.
c. Allow certain uses which are seasonal in nature, while providing standards that will assure
compatibility with the underlying zoning district and adjacent property uses. These uses can
include, but are not limited to, farmers' markets, produce stands, and outdoor sales associated
with public or religious holidays.
d. Limit temporary outdoor sales to activities which are short-term or seasonal and which do not
require permanent improvements to the site.
e. Allow for special events, while providing standards that assure the health, safety, general
welfare, aesthetics, and image of the community. Special events can include, but are not limited
to, concerts, car shows, races and walks, parades and festivals.
(2) Findings. The city recognizes that temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and
special events play an important role in the success of businesses and in fostering an active,
integrated, and appealing community. The city finds it necessary for the promotion and preservation
of the public health, safety, welfare and aesthetics of the community that the location, size and
appearance of temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events be
controlled. Further, the city finds that:
a. Temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events are an integral
component of economic development.
b. Temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events have a direct
impact on and a relationship to the image of the community.
c. Temporary outdoor events, seasonal or sidewalk sales activities may present an obstacle to
effective firefighting and other emergency services by blocking necessary exits, fire lanes or
turnaround areas.
d. Uncontrolled and unlimited temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and
special events can adversely impact the image and aesthetics of the community and, thereby,
undermine economic value and growth.
e. Uncontrolled temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events may
conflict with existing and neighboring uses.
f. Temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events can exceed the
city's capacity to provide municipal services. These municipal services include, but are not
limited to, sanitary facilities, fire, police and utility services. Regulation is needed to ensure that
the health, safety and general welfare of the community are not negatively impacted.
(3) Permit required. No person shall sponsor, host, or organize a temporary outdoor event, sidewalk
sale, seasonal sale or special event without the relevant permit issued pursuant to this section.
a. A temporary outdoor event permit shall be required for an activity which will be entirely confined
to the applicant's property, will last no longer than 72 hours, and is not reasonably expected to
impact traffic, parking, public safety, or other municipal services. Typically, temporary events
and sidewalk sales requiring an outdoor location would require this permit.
b. A seasonal sales permit shall be required for a commercial activity which will be entirely
confined to the applicant's property, will last longer than 72 hours, and is not reasonably
expected to impact traffic, parking, public safety, or other municipal services. Typically,
seasonal sales requiring an outdoor location would require this permit.
c. A special event permit shall be required for an activity which will require the use of public spaces
or services, or which is reasonably expected to impact traffic, parking, public safety, or other
municipal services.
(4) Exemptions. The following events shall not require a permit under this section:
a. Indoor events not reasonably expected to impact traffic, parking, public safety, or other
municipal services.
b. Noncommercial private events, including, but not limited to, weddings, wedding receptions,
anniversaries, birthdays, family reunions, funeral processions and graduation parties.
c. Events for which a public gathering permit has been issued as provided for in section 14-58;
provided that, the event is entirely confined to a city park and cannot be reasonably expected to
impact traffic, parking, public safety, or other municipal services.
d. Community events organized by or in partnership with the City of Chanhassen.
(5) Application for permit. The applicant shall submit an application for the relevant permit to the city
manager or their designee. Applications for temporary outdoor events and seasonal sales permits
shall be submitted on forms provided by the city at least ten business days prior to the date of the
requested activity. Applications for special events shall be submitted on forms provided by the city at
least 60 days prior to the date of the requested activity. They [The] city manager or their designee
may waive the ten or 60-day requirement if they find extenuating circumstances require a shorter
review period. Included with application should be:
a. A signed letter of permission from the owner of the property, if different than applicant, stating
that the applicant has permission to conduct the event.
b. A concise statement describing the purpose and nature of the activity, description of any
commercial activity, dates and times of operation, number of employees or volunteers involved,
estimated number of attendees, provisions for on-site parking and security, and any other
pertinent information required by the city manager or their designee to fully evaluate the
application.
c. A site plan or aerial photo of the property showing sufficient detail to evaluate the event's
location and the placement of any temporary structures associated with the event. The city
manager or their designee may require a copy of an approved site plan, drawn to scale, or an
"as-built" survey, which accurately represents existing conditions on the site, including
entrances and exits, and bona fide parking and driving areas, and which accurately indicates
any proposed temporary structures, including tents, stands, chemical toilets and signs, when, in
their judgement, such a plan is necessary to properly evaluate the permit.
d. An accurate floor plan of any building on the property, when, in the judgment of the city
manager or their designee, such a plan is necessary to properly evaluate the location of the
activity and the effectiveness of building entrances and exits.
e. Proof of liability insurance. The certificate of insurance must name the city, its officials,
employees and agents as additional insured. The limits of insurance will not be less than:
$1,000,000.00 each occurrence; $2,000,000.00 general aggregate. The city may waive or
reduce this requirement in the event that:
1. The applicant signs a verified statement that the required insurance coverage cannot be
obtained; or
2. The city manager or their designee determines that the insurance requirements are in
excess of the risk presented by the proposed activity.
f. Applications or valid permits for all regulated activities associated with the event including, but
not limited to, loudspeaker or similar device, temporary lifting of no parking requirements, street
closures for neighborhood events, race addendum and those required for the sale of produce,
prepared food, and/or alcohol.
g. If applying for a special event permit the applicant shall also provide:
1. A list of public spaces or services the event requires.
2. A statement detailing the events expected impact on traffic, parking, public safety, and any
other relevant public services. A detailed plan for how the applicant will manage and
mitigate these impacts shall also be included.
h. A nonrefundable fee which shall be imposed in accordance with the fee schedule established by
the city council. The intent of this section is to recover costs associated with administering the
ordinance from which this section derives. Permit fees shall reflect the costs of reviewing and
processing permits, as well as costs associated with periodic enforcement activities and
compliance checks.
(6) Procedure. The application will be processed as follows:
a. The city manager or their designee shall review applications for administrative permits and shall
determine if the proposal is in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, and the specific
standards for temporary outdoor events, seasonal sales, or special events as set forth in this
section. The application shall also be reviewed by the public safety department and any other
appropriate review agencies.
b. If the proposal is in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, and the general and
specific standards for temporary outdoor events, seasonal sales or special events as set forth in
this section, a written permit shall be issued to the applicant. Any conditions necessary to
assure compliance with applicable codes, ordinances, and the standards in this section shall be
attached to the permit.
c. If the city manager or their designee finds grounds for denying the permit, these findings shall
be communicated to the applicant and the application for the permit shall be considered denied;
unless, within ten days of the date of such notice, the applicant submits revised plans and/or
information with which brings the proposal into compliance.
d. If the city manager or their designee deny an application for a temporary outdoor event,
seasonal sale or special event, the applicant may appeal the decision to the city council. Such
an appeal must be submitted to the city manager in writing no later than ten days from the date
of the decision.
(7) Grounds for denial. A sales or event permit application may be denied if based on the application
and other relevant information, the city finds that:
a. Information contained in the application or otherwise submitted by the applicant is false or
insufficient to allow for an effective evaluation of the proposed sale or event.
b. The applicant fails to provide required or requested supplemental information after having been
notified by the city that additional documentation is required.
c. The applicant fails to agree to all conditions and terms of permit.
d. The applicant has outstanding fees due to the city, unresolved code enforcement or
noncompliant building permit issues, has violated the terms and conditions of a previously
issued sale or event permit, or has had a previously issued sale or event permit revoked by the
city.
e. The type of sale or event is not permitted by zoning or other statute.
f. The time, hours, location, size, or nature of the sale or event will substantially disrupt or burden
traffic, parking, public safety, or other municipal services and the city does not have sufficient
resources to mitigate these impacts.
g. The location or time of the sale or event conflicts with previously scheduled sales or events, and
the city does not have sufficient resources available to adequately support both sales or events
and/or normal operation of the city.
h. The location of the sale or event would interfere with construction or maintenance work
scheduled to take place upon or along public property or right-of-way.
i. The location of the sale or event would cause undue hardship for adjacent uses.
j. The sale or event is likely to endanger public safety, health or property.
k. The applicant does not have the required liability insurance.
l. The sale or event proposes to sell merchandise not normally sold or stocked by the occupants of
the premises. Seasonal sales permits are exempted from this requirement, as is the sale of
goods determined to be accessory to a proposed event (i.e. food truck or concession sales
during an event or the limited sale of goods as part of a charity event).
(8) Permit conditions. The city may place conditions on the time, place, and other aspects of any sale
or event allowed by this section as deemed necessary to mitigate the activity's impact on traffic,
parking, public safety, or other municipal services. These conditions may include, but are not limited
to:
a. Changing the date(s), time(s), route, or location of the proposed activity.
b. Removing or altering an aspect of the activity which cannot be mitigated sufficiently to ensure
public safety and welfare, or which causes liability to the city.
c. Alterations to the traffic control or safety/emergency plan.
d. Limiting the activity's maximum attendance.
e. Restricting the sale or consumption of food or alcohol.
f. Removal of advertising/promotional materials.
g. Requirements for the cleanup and restoration of any public property.
1. The applicant may be required to provide the city with an escrow in order to guarantee the
cleanup and restoration of public property. The amount of the escrow shall be determined
by the engineering department for potential impacts to streets and areas with the city right-
of-way and by the park and recreation department for potential impacts to parks and trails.
h. Requirements for appropriate sanitation facilities, waste receptacles, and availability of potable
water.
i. Requirements designed to ensure compliance with applicable local, state and federal laws.
j. Any other conditions which the city deems necessary.
(9) Limitations; general conditions.
a. All activities allowed by this section:
1. The site shall be cleared and all remaining debris removed from the sales or event site on
the last remaining day of the permit.
2. Acceptable space for off-street parking and traffic circulation generated by the use must be
provided. Curb and gutter with drive approaches is desired to provide safe turn
movements.
3. Lighting shall be compatible with surrounding adjacent uses.
4. Signage should be limited to window signs, and one outdoor sign no greater than 24
square feet. Other signage for purposes of traffic direction and control may be authorized
by the city manager or their designee.
5. Front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten feet.
6. All other pertinent city and state permits must be obtained.
7. The approved permit shall be kept on the premises for the duration of the activity.
8. No outdoor speaker system shall be allowed without permission from the city.
b. Temporary outdoor events:
1. Shall be permitted for the period specified in the administrative permit.
2. Shall not exceed 15 days per calendar year per property or center.
3. Shall have a maximum duration of three days.
c. Seasonal sales:
1. Permitted temporary outdoor sales activities are limited to the following:
a. Christmas tree sales.
b. Seasonal holiday markets.
c. Seasonal produce stands.
2. Shall be for the period specified in the administrative permit.
3. Shall not exceed 120 days per calendar year per property or center.
4. There shall be no more than three sales activities per year per property or center.
d. Special events:
1. Shall be permitted for the period specified in the administrative permit.
2. Shall have a maximum duration of seven days.
3. There shall be no more than four special event permits issued per property or center per
calendar year.
(10) Administration and enforcement.
a. The city may inspect the property on which the sale or event is being held before the start of the
sale or event and/or during the sale or event to verify compliance with the provisions of this
section or any permit conditions.
b. The city manager or their designee may, upon written notice, suspend or revoke the sale or
event permit of any person who violates any of the provisions of this section or any of the
conditions of the permit.
c. Any sale or event permit issued may be summarily revoked by the city's chief law enforcement
officer or fire chief at any time when by reason of an emergency, the law enforcement officer or
fire chief determines that the safety of the public or property requires such revocation.
d. If, at any time, a permit under the provisions of this section is suspended or revoked, it shall
thereafter be unlawful for that person or organization to operate, open, maintain, manage or
conduct any temporary outdoor event, seasonal sale or special event.
e. Violation of an issued permit or the provisions of this section may be grounds for denial of future
permit applications during a calendar year.
(Ord. No. 511, § 1, 10-11-10; Ord. No. 619, § 17, 2-27-17; Ord. No. 651, § 28, 12-9-19)
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Yard Waste Collection Update
Section 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.2.
Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources
Coordinator
File No:
SUMMARY
The city is again planning Spring and Fall yard waste collection events in 2020 and staff seeks City Council input on
any modifications to this year’s program or future events.
BACKGROUND
At the December 9, 2019 work session, staff presented the City Council with an update on the first year of yard
waste collection in Chanhassen after the Carver County Environmental Center ("Center") discontinued that service.
Staff shared that both the spring and fall events had gone smoothly and that the cost for each event was slightly less
than anticipated. Council had a number of questions they requested responses to at a future date. These questions
included: Provide a review of grant amounts over the years, use of coupons at the center and ways to reduce usage,
coupon usage in 2018 vs. 2019 (yard waste vs. no yard waste at the Center), how much grant funding does
Minnetonka receive, and where to find funding to cover costs so there are no dropoff fees.
DISCUSSION
SOLID WASTE GRANT – SCORE FUNDS
In 1989, the state instituted a statewide solid waste tax on all residential and commercial solid waste. Sixty percent of
this tax is funneled into the General Fund and the remaining forty percent is designated to be used for recycling
programs and initiatives throughout the state. The money is disseminated through grants from SCORE (Select
Committee on Recycling and the Environment Report). This annual report is an examination of recycling and waste
management in the state. SCORE funds flow through counties and are received by communities to help fund recycling
and solid waste programs. Most communities use local revenue to fund these programs with SCORE funding making
up about 20% of the total costs for the community.
In the previous yard waste report, a list of surrounding communities and their management of yard waste was
supplied. The City of Minnetonka’s yard waste management was noticeable for its extended hours, no limits to
quantities and no fees charged for drop off. The Council wondered how much grant money Minnetonka received in
order to provide this service to residents. Staff found that the residents do pay for the yard waste drop off as well as
the cityrun recycling program through a $4.50 monthly charge on their utility bill. This money is deposited in an
Environmental Fund, which finances curbside recycling, yard waste drop off, and other important renewable/reusable
programs. The city’s SCORE funding is used only for the curbside recycling and organics programs.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectYard Waste Collection UpdateSection5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.2.Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental ResourcesCoordinator File No: SUMMARYThe city is again planning Spring and Fall yard waste collection events in 2020 and staff seeks City Council input onany modifications to this year’s program or future events.BACKGROUNDAt the December 9, 2019 work session, staff presented the City Council with an update on the first year of yardwaste collection in Chanhassen after the Carver County Environmental Center ("Center") discontinued that service.Staff shared that both the spring and fall events had gone smoothly and that the cost for each event was slightly lessthan anticipated. Council had a number of questions they requested responses to at a future date. These questionsincluded: Provide a review of grant amounts over the years, use of coupons at the center and ways to reduce usage,coupon usage in 2018 vs. 2019 (yard waste vs. no yard waste at the Center), how much grant funding doesMinnetonka receive, and where to find funding to cover costs so there are no dropoff fees.DISCUSSIONSOLID WASTE GRANT – SCORE FUNDSIn 1989, the state instituted a statewide solid waste tax on all residential and commercial solid waste. Sixty percent ofthis tax is funneled into the General Fund and the remaining forty percent is designated to be used for recyclingprograms and initiatives throughout the state. The money is disseminated through grants from SCORE (SelectCommittee on Recycling and the Environment Report). This annual report is an examination of recycling and wastemanagement in the state. SCORE funds flow through counties and are received by communities to help fund recyclingand solid waste programs. Most communities use local revenue to fund these programs with SCORE funding makingup about 20% of the total costs for the community. In the previous yard waste report, a list of surrounding communities and their management of yard waste wassupplied. The City of Minnetonka’s yard waste management was noticeable for its extended hours, no limits toquantities and no fees charged for drop off. The Council wondered how much grant money Minnetonka received inorder to provide this service to residents. Staff found that the residents do pay for the yard waste drop off as well asthe cityrun recycling program through a $4.50 monthly charge on their utility bill. This money is deposited in an
Environmental Fund, which finances curbside recycling, yard waste drop off, and other important renewable/reusable
programs. The city’s SCORE funding is used only for the curbside recycling and organics programs.
The City of Chanhassen has records of receiving SCORE solid waste grant funding from Carver County since 1995.
In that year, the city received $7,280.00 which was used to cover the costs of a Spring Brush Day event and other
programs. In 2003, the city started issuing the recycling coupon, which is funded through the recycling grant. Annual
grant amounts along with annual recycling coupon expenditures are shown in the table below. The remainder of the
grant money after the coupon expenses is used each year for additional educational programming and city recycling
programs, such as purchasing recycling carts for parks and trails.
Year Grant Amount
Recycling
Coupon
# coupons
redeemed
1995 $ 7,280.00
1996 $ 7,280.00
1997 $ 9,453.64
1998 $ 9,346.67
1999 $ 9,346.67
2000 $ 9,346.67
2001 $ 13,017.00
2002 $ 13,017.00
2003 $ 13,017.00 $ 3,781.00 427
2004 $ 13,017.00 $ 8,131.71 1082
2005 $ 13,017.00 $ 11,039.95 1272
2006 $ 13,017.00 $ 9,955.00 1194
2007 $ 14,732.93 $ 13,910.99 1682
2008 $ 17,330.89 $ 9,867.50 NA
2009 $ 17,330.89 $ 13,061.25 1897
2010 $ 17,330.89 $ 14,347.00 2262
2011 $ 17,330.89 $ 14,135.00 NA
2012 $ 17,330.89 $ 12,247.00 2041
2013 $ 17,330.89 $ 12,603.00 1879
2014 $ 17,330.89 $ 14,443.00 2005
2015 $ 17,331.00 $ 9,919.00 NA
2016 $ 17,331.00 $ 14,073.00 2204
2017 $ 17,331.00 $ 15,169.50 2161
2018 $ 17,742.00 $ 14,887.00 1960
2019 $ 17,742.00 $ 8,699.00 736
Noticeable in the summary is the lack of movement in the amount of funding awarded each year to the city. City costs
for programs and supplies has risen, but our grant funding has not. The city has had to reduce its programming to
reflect the lack of growth in funding. Increased funding from the county should be explored.
One of the points raised at the last discussion was whether coupon usage could be reduced in order to divert more
funding to yard waste. Chanhassen residents have been using the recycling coupons at the Center since its opening in
2003. Each year, two coupons worth $10 in recycling fees are issued twice a year and are valid for about 6 months
each. These coupons can be used anytime at the center for any items that have associated fees. The items accepted
at the center include hazardous materials, high recycling content or are difficult to dispose of. If thrown in a landfill or
illegally disposed of, these items cause significant issues. Staff does not recommend reducing usage of the recycling
coupons since the Center is the best local resource for many items, and residents should be encouraged to properly
dispose of items there.
YARD WASTE COLLECTION DROPOFF FEES
The Carver County Environmental Center had been accepting yard waste since its opening in 2003. From the start,
the fees for yard waste drop off were established at $1 per bag and $8 per cubic yard. The fees did not change since
that time leading up to the elimination of yard waste collection in 2019. When the Council approved the yard waste
events for the city, the same rates as established by the Center were set for drop off at the city events. In 2019, the
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectYard Waste Collection UpdateSection5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.2.Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental ResourcesCoordinator File No: SUMMARYThe city is again planning Spring and Fall yard waste collection events in 2020 and staff seeks City Council input onany modifications to this year’s program or future events.BACKGROUNDAt the December 9, 2019 work session, staff presented the City Council with an update on the first year of yardwaste collection in Chanhassen after the Carver County Environmental Center ("Center") discontinued that service.Staff shared that both the spring and fall events had gone smoothly and that the cost for each event was slightly lessthan anticipated. Council had a number of questions they requested responses to at a future date. These questionsincluded: Provide a review of grant amounts over the years, use of coupons at the center and ways to reduce usage,coupon usage in 2018 vs. 2019 (yard waste vs. no yard waste at the Center), how much grant funding doesMinnetonka receive, and where to find funding to cover costs so there are no dropoff fees.DISCUSSIONSOLID WASTE GRANT – SCORE FUNDSIn 1989, the state instituted a statewide solid waste tax on all residential and commercial solid waste. Sixty percent ofthis tax is funneled into the General Fund and the remaining forty percent is designated to be used for recyclingprograms and initiatives throughout the state. The money is disseminated through grants from SCORE (SelectCommittee on Recycling and the Environment Report). This annual report is an examination of recycling and wastemanagement in the state. SCORE funds flow through counties and are received by communities to help fund recyclingand solid waste programs. Most communities use local revenue to fund these programs with SCORE funding makingup about 20% of the total costs for the community. In the previous yard waste report, a list of surrounding communities and their management of yard waste wassupplied. The City of Minnetonka’s yard waste management was noticeable for its extended hours, no limits toquantities and no fees charged for drop off. The Council wondered how much grant money Minnetonka received inorder to provide this service to residents. Staff found that the residents do pay for the yard waste drop off as well asthe cityrun recycling program through a $4.50 monthly charge on their utility bill. This money is deposited in anEnvironmental Fund, which finances curbside recycling, yard waste drop off, and other important renewable/reusableprograms. The city’s SCORE funding is used only for the curbside recycling and organics programs.The City of Chanhassen has records of receiving SCORE solid waste grant funding from Carver County since 1995. In that year, the city received $7,280.00 which was used to cover the costs of a Spring Brush Day event and otherprograms. In 2003, the city started issuing the recycling coupon, which is funded through the recycling grant. Annualgrant amounts along with annual recycling coupon expenditures are shown in the table below. The remainder of thegrant money after the coupon expenses is used each year for additional educational programming and city recyclingprograms, such as purchasing recycling carts for parks and trails. Year Grant Amount RecyclingCoupon # couponsredeemed1995$ 7,280.001996$ 7,280.001997$ 9,453.641998$ 9,346.671999$ 9,346.672000$ 9,346.672001$ 13,017.002002$ 13,017.002003$ 13,017.00 $ 3,781.00 4272004$ 13,017.00 $ 8,131.71 10822005$ 13,017.00 $ 11,039.95 12722006$ 13,017.00 $ 9,955.00 11942007$ 14,732.93 $ 13,910.99 16822008$ 17,330.89 $ 9,867.50 NA2009$ 17,330.89 $ 13,061.25 18972010$ 17,330.89 $ 14,347.00 22622011$ 17,330.89 $ 14,135.00 NA2012$ 17,330.89 $ 12,247.00 20412013$ 17,330.89 $ 12,603.00 18792014$ 17,330.89 $ 14,443.00 20052015$ 17,331.00 $ 9,919.00 NA2016$ 17,331.00 $ 14,073.00 22042017$ 17,331.00 $ 15,169.50 21612018$ 17,742.00 $ 14,887.00 19602019$ 17,742.00 $ 8,699.00 736Noticeable in the summary is the lack of movement in the amount of funding awarded each year to the city. City costsfor programs and supplies has risen, but our grant funding has not. The city has had to reduce its programming toreflect the lack of growth in funding. Increased funding from the county should be explored. One of the points raised at the last discussion was whether coupon usage could be reduced in order to divert morefunding to yard waste. Chanhassen residents have been using the recycling coupons at the Center since its opening in2003. Each year, two coupons worth $10 in recycling fees are issued twice a year and are valid for about 6 monthseach. These coupons can be used anytime at the center for any items that have associated fees. The items acceptedat the center include hazardous materials, high recycling content or are difficult to dispose of. If thrown in a landfill orillegally disposed of, these items cause significant issues. Staff does not recommend reducing usage of the recyclingcoupons since the Center is the best local resource for many items, and residents should be encouraged to properlydispose of items there. YARD WASTE COLLECTION DROPOFF FEESThe Carver County Environmental Center had been accepting yard waste since its opening in 2003. From the start,the fees for yard waste drop off were established at $1 per bag and $8 per cubic yard. The fees did not change since
that time leading up to the elimination of yard waste collection in 2019. When the Council approved the yard waste
events for the city, the same rates as established by the Center were set for drop off at the city events. In 2019, the
net cost of the spring and fall yard waste collection events was $5,196.80. If the city had not collected fees, the cost
to the city for the events would have been $8,374.98.
The elimination of yard waste from the Center did free up more of the grant funding for city programs since less
recycling coupons were used at the facility. Some of that funding could be applied towards yard waste events in the
city. Modifications to yard waste collection could include any of the following:
Two additional days, one in the spring and one in the fall, could be added using some of the grant funding.
The current event schedule could be kept and the fees could be eliminated.
Leave the event as is and provide more funding for recycling and organics programs in the city.
As the county now expects cities to handle yard waste, increased grant funding would be especially helpful. Increased
funding could provide more event days, no dropoff fees and/or coverage of city labor for the events.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Discuss 2020 Key Financial Strategies and Legislative Priorities
Section 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.3.
Prepared By Jake Foster, Assistant City Manager File No:
SUMMARY
Council discussed and provided priority rankings for the proposed 2020 KFS goals at the January 27th work
session. The priority rankings were compiled and averaged by staff. Any item that received an average priority
ranking score of 2 or less has been highlighted as a proposed goal in the attached spreadsheet.
Additionally, a "Legislative Priorities Meeting" was held on February 4th. All of Chanhassen's elected officials from the
Met Council, the County, the State, and the U.S. House of Representatives were invited to the meeting. At the
meeting, the City's legislative priorities were discussed. Attached to this item is a document outlining each of the City's
legislative priorities for 2020, and additional documentation on the proposed solution for the TH41/Minnetonka
Middle School traffic issue.
Both the 2020 KFS goals and legislative priorities are up for discussion prior to being brought to Council for approval
at a future meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
2020 KFS Goals
2020 Legislative Priorities
TH41/MMS Entry
Department Goal Action Ryan Campion Coleman McDonald Tjornhom Average
Community
Development/Fire Business licensing white paper
Evaluate means to ensure compliance
with City codes related to building and
fire safety for businesses. Develop
white paper for licsensing policy.
2 2 1.5 3 2 2.1
Engineering
Review proposed street
improvements in the 5-year
CIP
The proposed street improvement
projects could be reprioritized to
address the needs of individual
streets versus improving the overall
average pavement condition score
of city streets.
3 1 1 3 2 2.0
Engineering Storm and retention pond
review
Information from the City’s Storm
Water Asset Management Program
(SWAMP) will be presented to
provide an overview of the current
condition of the ponds within the
city. Upcoming improvement plans,
a proposed schedule for action and
restoration, and funding sources will
also be presented.
1 2 1.5 2 2 1.7
Department Goal Action Ryan Campion Coleman McDonald Tjornhom Average
Parks Various parks-related goals
Build two covered/refrigerated outdoor
hockey rinks at the Chanhassen
Recreation Center
Build permanent restroom facilities at
Lake Ann Park, Bandimere Park and City
Center Park
Build a community splash pad attraction
at Bandimere Park
Identify a funding source and timeline
for Lake Ann Park Preserve trail
expansion
1 1 2 3 2 1.8
Finance Consider implementing
business subsidy programs
Compare other city business subsidy
programs for assistance with fees (e.g.
awarding grants to businesses who
meet Council-defined criteria).
2 1 1.5 2 2 1.7
Admin Explore alternatives for high
speed internet
Identify areas that have access to
Jaguar/Carver County, expansion of
fiber, and other alternatives/options
(e.g. small cell and/or 5G).
1 1 1 3 2 1.6
Community Development
- Environmental
Resources
Review involvement in
GreenStep program
Identify and address concerns with
involvement in GreenStep Cities
program (e.g. Q&A session).
3 2 1 3 2 2.2
Admin Internal review of
employees/survey
Solicit feedback from city employees
regarding the City of Chanhassen as a
workplace.
1 1 2 3 2 1.8
Department Goal Action Ryan Campion Coleman McDonald Tjornhom Average
Key:
2020 KFS Goal
City of Chanhassen
2020 Legislative Priorities
1. Support “Opt-Out” Suburban Transit Agencies: Chanhassen supports opt-out cities
and suburban transit agencies, in concurrence with the findings of the Office of the
Legislative Auditors January 2011 Governance of Transit Report. Creation of these
agencies provided residents and businesses with a desired service that met their needs
while maintaining financial and management controls. The State should refrain from
infringing on the ability of local agencies to provide and control bus services for the
benefit of area businesses and residents. Suburban riders are an integral part of the
suburban transit system.
2. Building Code Fees: The Housing Affordability Institute (a builders’ industry group)
released a report on city building permit fees which claim cities are overcharging and
driving up the costs on new homes. This report paints an inaccurate and incomplete
picture and is a gross oversimplification of the cities’ actual costs to support new home
construction. Below are some key points to consider when looking at building permit
fees:
• Building permit fees are based on the value of the residential or commercial
construction project (not a fee for service).
• Builders and developers are involved in setting the valuation (they provide an
estimated permit value that reflects the cost of the construction).
• Building permit fees are not a primary driver of high housing costs (in many cities
it’s 4% to 6%). The largest contributions to the cost of new construction are labor
and materials, followed by the cost of land – all of which are dictated by market
forces, not cities.
• The report did not adequately address all city costs related to development. To
fairly analyze the data, all fees collected and city expenses (which include
administrative, engineering, planning and zoning expenses) should have been
examined in the report.
• The report did not break out commercial industrial (C/I) vs. residential, nor did it
differentiate single family from multi-family or separate out additions or
alterations. Further, the report did not address multiyear projects or factor in
revenue/expenses that were not complete within the calendar year.
MLC believes strongly that development should pay for development and costs for those
services should not be passed on to existing residents through increased property taxes.
Local governments must ensure new developments meet established standards for the
safety of future residents, and building permits play an important role in advancing these
oversight responsibilities.
3. Unfunded Mandates: Chanhassen opposes both current and future statutory changes
that create mandated tasks that require new or added local costs without a corresponding
funding mechanism. Without a funding source, Chanhassen is potentially in the position
of having to increase property taxes and/or fees. These unfunded mandates add to the
responsibilities for cities and the ability to fund traditional service needs.
4. Local Governance & Restriction on Local Government Budgets: The city strongly
supports participation in cooperative arrangements, but strongly opposes any effort to
weaken the ability of local governments to provide the best services and benefits for their
communities (levy limits, unfunded mandates, cooperative purchasing, and ability to
grant variances). Local budgets are subject to intense public scrutiny. Inflation alone
forces cities to spend more money to maintain current service levels. The people who
know what is best for this city are the people who live and work here.
5. Environmental: The current permitting processes are too time-consuming and can slow
down development processes. Research should be conducted by both city and their
jurisdictional staff on streamlining one or more of the following processes: NPDES,
MS4, Non-degradation, Wetland Conservation Act, and Clean Water Act requirements,
EPA Standards and Regulatory Rules, etc.
Additionally, the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) is proposing a
contradictory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) rule change that
significantly reduces the threshold of wetland impact from a 2.5 acres to a 1 acre limit for
projects requiring preparation of an EAW document. This would increase the number
EAW's (and costs of projects) that will need to be prepared. This change goes against the
State's streamlining goals. Additionally, the proposed rule change does not increase
environmental protection because it duplicates environmental review efforts already
required by state and federal regulations governing work in wetlands and public waters.
6. TH 5 Project Improvements (West of TH 41 to Norwood Young America): This is a
joint project with MnDOT, Carver County, and the Cities of Victoria, Waconia,
Norwood/Young America, and Chanhassen.
Problem: No funding or schedule to make the corridor four lanes.
7. Highway 212: Continue development of Highway 212 from County Road 147 on the
Chaska/Carver border to the City of Cologne.
Problem: No construction funding source secured.
8. Fiscal Disparities: Explore modifications to the fiscal disparities program in order to
reduce the imbalances inherent in the current formula. The fiscal disparities program was
created in 1971, and although the population of the metro area has grown by over 1.5M
people since that time, the formula for fiscal disparities has remained the same. As the
population grows, the need for retail services to support residents grows with it.
Individual cities and their property taxpayers take the lead in developing regional, retail,
and service assets that support residents and visitors to the area. In addition to the cost of
planning and developing these assets, retail and service industries consume significant
city services, particularly in the area of public safety, as well as impose significant
burdens on local roads, bridges, and other transportation infrastructure.
A 2012 report commissioned by the Minnesota Legislature demonstrates that the property
taxes generated by these retail services do not pay for the additional services they require,
an imbalance that is increased by the fiscal disparities program. Local taxpayers in
communities that host regional retail assets are forced to subsidize the costs of city and
county services while taxpayers in communities that use, but do not develop, these assets
have their tax rates lowered.
LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR OTHER AGENCIES:
Metro Cities 2020 Legislative Policies
League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies
g:\admin\tg\legislative priorities\2020\2020 legislative priorities.docx
Draft Intersection Review
1 CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 | 763.475.0010 | WWW.SRFCONSULTING.COM
SRF No. 11376
To:Paul Oehme, PE
Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Chanhassen
From:Matt Pacyna, PE, Principal
Brent Clark, EIT, Engineer
Date:October 16, 2018
Subject:MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle School West Intersection Concept Review
Introduction
As requested, SRF has reviewed the MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle School West intersection
in the City of Chanhassen. This intersection has been the subject of resident concerns, particularly
related to school peak period operations. The main objectives of this review are to quantify current
operations, evaluate potential intersection concepts, and develop preliminary concepts to understand
potential right-of-way implications and costs. The following information summarizes the assumptions,
methodology, and findings of the intersection review.
Existing Conditions
1)Intersection turning movement counts from October 2015 and June 2018 were provided by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) at the MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle
School West intersection; school was in session during both counts.
a)The West Middle School hours of operations are from 9:15 a.m. to 3:55 p.m.; traffic volumes
at the school peak from 8:15 to 9:15 a.m. and 3:45 to 4:45 p.m., primarily near start/end times.
b)The June 2018 p.m. counts appear higher than a typical day while the a.m. counts were similar
between October 2015 and June 2018; the average of the two turning movement counts from
2015 and 2018 was used for the capacity analysis.
2)Crash history was reviewed between year 2011 and 2015, which represents the most recent five
(5) years of crash data available from Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT). This
included the MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle School West intersection, as well as the
MN Highway 41/Chaska Road intersection, where there is increased pedestrian activity due to the
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB). The predominant crash statistics are as follows:
a)There was a total of 12 crashes near the Minnetonka Middle School West access during the
five (5)-year study period. Two (2) crashes were at the Minnetonka Middle School West access,
seven (7) crashes were at the Chaska Road intersection, and three (3) crashes occurred along
MN Highway 41 between Chaska Road and the Minnetonka Middle School West access.
Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer October 16, 2018
MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle School West Intersection Concept Review Page 2
b)12 Total Crashes - eight (8) “property damage” and four (4) “possible injury”
c)Minnetonka Middle School West access - one (1) “run-off the road” and one (1) “rear-end”
d)Chaska Boulevard RRFB - one (1) “pedestrian-related” crash, with “possible injury”
3)The MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle School West intersection currently operates at an
overall level of service C (LOS C) during both the school a.m. and p.m. peak hours. However,
the Minnetonka Middle School West access approach operates at LOS F during these time periods.
a)Southbound left-turn queues extend beyond the existing turn lane storage five (5) to ten (10)
percent of the school peak hours.
b)Westbound left-turn maneuvers are difficult to complete; the average delay for the westbound
left-turn movement is seven (7) to eight (8) minutes during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours;
westbound queues currently extend 300 to 450 feet on average.
c)Synchro/SimTraffic software (version 9) was utilized to analyze existing intersection capacity;
the capacity analysis focused on the school peak, not the peak of MN Highway 41.
Concepts
To understand how potential traffic control changes would impact intersection capacity and queuing
at the MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle School West intersection, concepts were identified. These
included a traffic signal and two roundabout concepts. The following information provides an
overview of the concepts and associated capacity analysis results, while additional level of service and
queuing information is summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Preliminary cost information is also included.
Traffic Signal Concept
1)Existing traffic volumes do not currently meet any traffic signal warrants at the MN Highway 41/
Minnetonka Middle School West intersection; however, since the westbound left-turn maneuver
is difficult, there may be other motorists that are currently avoiding this maneuver.
a)For warrant purposes, only the left-turn volume is considered for the minor approach; unless
through volumes on the mainline are high enough to include a portion of right-turns; traffic
volumes on MN Highway 41 are not high enough to justify including the right-turns.
b)If a traffic signal were installed at the intersection, it is expected that a portion of motorists
currently making a westbound right-turn maneuver would divert to make a left-turn maneuver.
If 50 percent of motorists currently making a right-turn divert to the left-turn, the intersection
would be expected to meet the peak hour warrant criteria.
2)The MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle School West intersection, assuming a traffic signal was
installed and no other turn lane changes, would be expected to operate at an overall LOS B during
the school a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
Paul Oehme, Public Works Director/City Engineer October 16, 2018
MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle School West Intersection Concept Review Page 3
a)A traffic signal would reduce the average westbound delay for motorists exiting the
Minnetonka Middle School West access onto MN Highway 41 by approximately one (1) to
two (2) minutes.
b)Southbound left-turn queues would be expected to extend beyond the existing turn lane
storage approximately 25 to 35 percent of the peak hour during the school peak periods,
although this turn lane could be restriped to avoid impacts to the through lane; MN Highway
41 queues would be expected to extend 300 feet or greater.
3)If a traffic signal is installed, restriping MN Highway 41 to provide additional turn lane storage
should be considered; additionally, the RRFB at the Chaska Boulevard intersection may be
removed since the signal will provide a reliable pedestrian crossing.
4)The planning level construction cost estimate to implement a traffic signal is $350,000.
Roundabout Concepts
Two roundabout concepts were evaluated, which are illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. The primary
difference between the two concepts are related to how the concepts tie into the adjacent roadway
network. The first roundabout concept illustrates how a hybrid roundabout configuration would tie
into the existing roadway network, while the second roundabout concept illustrates how a hybrid
roundabout configuration would tie into a future 4-lane facility along MN Highway 41. The overall
roundabout footprint does not change between these two roundabout concepts, rather the lane
designations are the primary difference. The following information provides a summary of the two
roundabout concepts, associated capacity analysis, and preliminary cost estimate.
1)Roundabout Concept 1 (see Figure 1) would be expected to operate at an overall LOS B during
the school a.m. peak hour and an overall LOS C during the school p.m. peak hour.
a)Queues in the northbound shared thru/left-turn lane are expected to extend approximately
450 feet during the school p.m. peak hour.
2)Roundabout Concept 2 (see Figure 1) would be expected to operate at an overall LOS A during
both the school a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
a)Northbound queues would be expected to be 100 feet or less during both the school a.m. and
p.m. peak hours.
3)The planning level construction costs of both roundabout concepts is estimated to be $1,400,000.
NORTHNorth0011376
October 2018
Roundabout Concept 2
MN Highway 41/Minnetonka Middle school West Intersection Concept Review
City of Chanhassen
Figure 2H:\Projects\11000\11376\TS\Figures\Fig02_Roundabout Concept 2.cdr
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Discuss Early 2021 Budget Estimates
Section 5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.4.
Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:
BACKGROUND
During the Key Financial Strategy goalsetting sessions a few years ago, the city council identified the desire to have
an early budget meeting to discuss potential budget impacts for the upcoming year. The discussion would prove to be
helpful for the council to consider and research any budget impact issues in advance of the budget meetings that take
place in the summer.
It is very important to clarify that the numbers presented in this document are extremely preliminary and should be
considered estimates only. We use historical trends and information we had available whenever possible, but the
majority if not all of these numbers will change to some extent between now and setting the final levy at the end of the
year. In addition, these were the significant changes staff was aware of at this point in time. It is very likely there will be
other significant changes that could have an impact on the 2021 budget not included in this list; therefore, the list should
not be considered all inclusive. Staff will do its best to communicate any other significant impacts on the 2021 budget
as soon as they become available.
POTENTIAL REVENUE/POSITIVE CHANGES IN 2021 BUDGET
The first number we usually discuss each year when setting the budget is the new growth (or new homes/businesses
constructed or improvements made).Based on the current new growth trends and the previous year’s permits and
construction, staff is estimating new growth to be around 1.5% for taxes payable in 2021.This equates to roughly
$175,000 in new tax dollars available to offset any increased service costs.
POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE CHANGES IN 2021 BUDGET
Wages – Based on the current hiring trends and attempting to remain competitive within the local government market,
staff believes a 3% increase in the 2021 budget should be considered.This equates to roughly $160,000 in total costs
to the General Fund.
Police Contract – We are anticipating the contract with the Carver County Sheriff’s office to increase 5% for
2021.This equates to about a $100,000 increase to the General Fund.
Health Insurance – Staff will be going out for bid later this year for health insurance quotes, as we do every year.
We anticipate the increase could be as much as 15% for 2021.This amounts to a $195,000 impact to the General
Fund.
Seasonal & Temp Salary adjustments – Similar to regular wages, to remain competitive within the market staff
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectDiscuss Early 2021 Budget EstimatesSection5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.4.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: BACKGROUNDDuring the Key Financial Strategy goalsetting sessions a few years ago, the city council identified the desire to havean early budget meeting to discuss potential budget impacts for the upcoming year. The discussion would prove to behelpful for the council to consider and research any budget impact issues in advance of the budget meetings that takeplace in the summer.It is very important to clarify that the numbers presented in this document are extremely preliminary and should beconsidered estimates only. We use historical trends and information we had available whenever possible, but themajority if not all of these numbers will change to some extent between now and setting the final levy at the end of theyear. In addition, these were the significant changes staff was aware of at this point in time. It is very likely there will beother significant changes that could have an impact on the 2021 budget not included in this list; therefore, the list shouldnot be considered all inclusive. Staff will do its best to communicate any other significant impacts on the 2021 budgetas soon as they become available.POTENTIAL REVENUE/POSITIVE CHANGES IN 2021 BUDGETThe first number we usually discuss each year when setting the budget is the new growth (or new homes/businessesconstructed or improvements made).Based on the current new growth trends and the previous year’s permits andconstruction, staff is estimating new growth to be around 1.5% for taxes payable in 2021.This equates to roughly$175,000 in new tax dollars available to offset any increased service costs.POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE CHANGES IN 2021 BUDGETWages – Based on the current hiring trends and attempting to remain competitive within the local government market,staff believes a 3% increase in the 2021 budget should be considered.This equates to roughly $160,000 in total coststo the General Fund.Police Contract – We are anticipating the contract with the Carver County Sheriff’s office to increase 5% for2021.This equates to about a $100,000 increase to the General Fund.Health Insurance – Staff will be going out for bid later this year for health insurance quotes, as we do every year.We anticipate the increase could be as much as 15% for 2021.This amounts to a $195,000 impact to the GeneralFund.
Seasonal & Temp Salary adjustments – Similar to regular wages, to remain competitive within the market staff
believes a 3% adjustment for our seasonal and temporary positions will be needed.The result of the adjustments will
vary by type of positions but staff is anticipating the total cost increase to the General Fund to be around $15,000.
Assessing Contract – With new parcels each year being added to the city, staff is anticipating a small increase of
$10,000 to the assessing department budget in the General Fund.
General Liability & Work Comp Insurance – Staff believes that there could be small increases to both of these
insurance types for 2021 and is planning on an estimated total budgeted impact of $15,000.
Fire Dept Admin Position – During last year’s budget process staff discussed the benefits of adding the current halt
time admin position in the fire department to full time which would provide multiple benefits to the department. The
cost of making that position full time has a total budget impact of $38,000.
Additional Contracted Officer with CCSO – The city contracts with the Carver County Sheriff’s Office for police
services. The current staffing level is at 15. The city has not added an additional deputy to the police contract since
2007. The estimated budget impact is $117,000.
Shared School Resource Officer with Minnetonka School District – Minnetonka School District will be
contracting with CCSO for a School Resource Officer for the 9 months school is in session. The city would like to
partner with the school district for the 3 months during the summer. This position would enhance the patrol function
during the summer (3 months that school is not in session). The estimated budget impact is $30,000.
Code Enforcement Intern –This is a position that has been identified as a benefit to multiple departments including
the planning and building departments, as well as the community service officers. A majority of the code enforcement
complaints take place during the summer months. These issues could largely be addressed by an internlevel employee
which would enable planning, building and CSO staff to prioritize other work. Hiring a code enforcement intern would
have a total budget impact of $23,000.
Engineering Admin Assistant to 40 Hour per week –The current position is being staffed at 32hours/week;
however, receives fulltime benefits. The workload of the department would support 40hours/week. The additional
availability will help the engineering department keep up with administrative tasks such as website updates, filing, public
outreach, invoicing, contract management, etc. The estimated budget impact is $12,000.
Creation of an Infrastructure Asset Manager position in the Public Works Department –The use of
technology to inventory, monitor, assign maintenance tasks, and plan for replacement/refurbishment of a whole host of
City Infrastructure assets requires a tremendous amount of time dedication, beyond what any current staff position has
availability for. This FTE position would support not only the PW Department, but Parks, Engineering, IT, Fire, and
Administration departments. Our large financial investment and commitment to Cartegraph can be further leveraged by
this potential new position as we’ve only just scratched the surface of its capabilities. A great deal of time and cost
efficiencies will be realized by the addition of a dedicated Asset Manager. The estimated budget impact is $115,000.
TOTAL IMPACT
If the listed changes above all hold, staff is expecting a shortfall of around $535,000.There are a number of ways to
address this shortfall, including but not limited to:
Levy above New Growth
Reduction of costs by reducing a service level in the General Fund or eliminating one or more of the items listed
above
Staff will provide additional information in June for discussion on the 2021 budget with the city council, but we look
forward to hearing your thoughts about the information presented this evening.
DISCUSSION
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectDiscuss Early 2021 Budget EstimatesSection5:00 P.M. WORK SESSION Item No: A.4.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: BACKGROUNDDuring the Key Financial Strategy goalsetting sessions a few years ago, the city council identified the desire to havean early budget meeting to discuss potential budget impacts for the upcoming year. The discussion would prove to behelpful for the council to consider and research any budget impact issues in advance of the budget meetings that takeplace in the summer.It is very important to clarify that the numbers presented in this document are extremely preliminary and should beconsidered estimates only. We use historical trends and information we had available whenever possible, but themajority if not all of these numbers will change to some extent between now and setting the final levy at the end of theyear. In addition, these were the significant changes staff was aware of at this point in time. It is very likely there will beother significant changes that could have an impact on the 2021 budget not included in this list; therefore, the list shouldnot be considered all inclusive. Staff will do its best to communicate any other significant impacts on the 2021 budgetas soon as they become available.POTENTIAL REVENUE/POSITIVE CHANGES IN 2021 BUDGETThe first number we usually discuss each year when setting the budget is the new growth (or new homes/businessesconstructed or improvements made).Based on the current new growth trends and the previous year’s permits andconstruction, staff is estimating new growth to be around 1.5% for taxes payable in 2021.This equates to roughly$175,000 in new tax dollars available to offset any increased service costs.POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE CHANGES IN 2021 BUDGETWages – Based on the current hiring trends and attempting to remain competitive within the local government market,staff believes a 3% increase in the 2021 budget should be considered.This equates to roughly $160,000 in total coststo the General Fund.Police Contract – We are anticipating the contract with the Carver County Sheriff’s office to increase 5% for2021.This equates to about a $100,000 increase to the General Fund.Health Insurance – Staff will be going out for bid later this year for health insurance quotes, as we do every year.We anticipate the increase could be as much as 15% for 2021.This amounts to a $195,000 impact to the GeneralFund.Seasonal & Temp Salary adjustments – Similar to regular wages, to remain competitive within the market staffbelieves a 3% adjustment for our seasonal and temporary positions will be needed.The result of the adjustments willvary by type of positions but staff is anticipating the total cost increase to the General Fund to be around $15,000.Assessing Contract – With new parcels each year being added to the city, staff is anticipating a small increase of$10,000 to the assessing department budget in the General Fund.General Liability & Work Comp Insurance – Staff believes that there could be small increases to both of theseinsurance types for 2021 and is planning on an estimated total budgeted impact of $15,000.Fire Dept Admin Position – During last year’s budget process staff discussed the benefits of adding the current halttime admin position in the fire department to full time which would provide multiple benefits to the department. Thecost of making that position full time has a total budget impact of $38,000.Additional Contracted Officer with CCSO – The city contracts with the Carver County Sheriff’s Office for policeservices. The current staffing level is at 15. The city has not added an additional deputy to the police contract since2007. The estimated budget impact is $117,000.Shared School Resource Officer with Minnetonka School District – Minnetonka School District will becontracting with CCSO for a School Resource Officer for the 9 months school is in session. The city would like topartner with the school district for the 3 months during the summer. This position would enhance the patrol functionduring the summer (3 months that school is not in session). The estimated budget impact is $30,000.Code Enforcement Intern –This is a position that has been identified as a benefit to multiple departments includingthe planning and building departments, as well as the community service officers. A majority of the code enforcementcomplaints take place during the summer months. These issues could largely be addressed by an internlevel employeewhich would enable planning, building and CSO staff to prioritize other work. Hiring a code enforcement intern wouldhave a total budget impact of $23,000.Engineering Admin Assistant to 40 Hour per week –The current position is being staffed at 32hours/week;however, receives fulltime benefits. The workload of the department would support 40hours/week. The additionalavailability will help the engineering department keep up with administrative tasks such as website updates, filing, publicoutreach, invoicing, contract management, etc. The estimated budget impact is $12,000.Creation of an Infrastructure Asset Manager position in the Public Works Department –The use oftechnology to inventory, monitor, assign maintenance tasks, and plan for replacement/refurbishment of a whole host ofCity Infrastructure assets requires a tremendous amount of time dedication, beyond what any current staff position hasavailability for. This FTE position would support not only the PW Department, but Parks, Engineering, IT, Fire, andAdministration departments. Our large financial investment and commitment to Cartegraph can be further leveraged bythis potential new position as we’ve only just scratched the surface of its capabilities. A great deal of time and costefficiencies will be realized by the addition of a dedicated Asset Manager. The estimated budget impact is $115,000.TOTAL IMPACTIf the listed changes above all hold, staff is expecting a shortfall of around $535,000.There are a number of ways toaddress this shortfall, including but not limited to:Levy above New GrowthReduction of costs by reducing a service level in the General Fund or eliminating one or more of the items listedaboveStaff will provide additional information in June for discussion on the 2021 budget with the city council, but we lookforward to hearing your thoughts about the information presented this evening.
DISCUSSION
Staff will be looking for direction on any of the budget items included as well as any other council driven budget items
for 2021.
ATTACHMENTS:
2021 Budget Estimates
Item Fiscal Budget Impact
Increases to General Fund Budget
Wage Increases (3%) and other wage adjustments (160,000)$
Police Contract (5%)(100,000)
Health Insurance (15%)(195,000)
OT Adjustments (30,000)
Seasonal & Temp Sal Adjustments (15,000)
Assessing Contract and New Parcels (10,000)
Increase in General Liab & Work Comp Insurance (15,000)
Additional Officer with CCSO contract (117,000)
Shared SRO with School District (30,000)
Fund additional 1/2 FTE for Fire Dept Admin Position (38,000)
Code Enforcement Intern (23,000)
Eng Admin Asst to 40 hrs/week (12,000)
New Eng FTE (115,000)
TOTAL (860,000)
Decreases to General Fund Budget
New Growth (1.5%)175,000
Paid off Library Levy 150,000
TOTAL 325,000
Net Needed to Fund Levy with No change in City portion of Property Tax Bill (535,000)
City of Chanhassen
Analysis of Changes for the 2021 General Fund Budget
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated January 27, 2020
Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1.
Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:
PROPOSED MOTION
“The City Council approves the City Council minutes dated January 27, 2020.”
Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.
ATTACHMENTS:
City Council Summary Minutes dated January 27, 2020
City Council Verbatim Minutes dated January 27, 2020
City Council Work Session Minutes dated January 27, 2020
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY MINUTES
JANUUARY 27, 2020
Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to
the Flag.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman McDonald, Councilman
Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Tjornhom
STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Charlie Howley, George
Bender, Chief Don Johnson, Lt. Lance Pearce, and Roger Knutson
PUBLIC PRESENT:
Tom Danielson Bolton & Menk
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: INVITATION TO FEBRUARY FESTIVAL. Mayor Ryan
invited all residents to attend the 27th Annual February Festival being held on Saturday, February
1, 2020 at Lake Ann.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded
to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s
recommendations:
1. Approve City Council Minutes dated January 13, 2020
2. Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated December 20, 2019
3. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated December 10, 2019
4. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated December 10, 2019
5. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated December 3, 2019
6. Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated November 15, 2019
7. Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated November 13, 2019
City Council Summary – January 27, 2020
2
8. Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans and Specifications for The Park 2nd
Addition
9. Resolution #2020-03: Approve Ratifying Changes to Chanhassen Fire Relief
Association Bylaws
10. Approve Extension of Agreement to Allow an Auto Repair Garage on Property Zoned
Planned Unit Development (PUD), 7900 Kerber Boulevard, Douglas Hansen
11. Resolution #2020-04: Appoint Election Judges for State Presidential Primary Election
and Approve Rates of Pay
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. CHIEF’S AWARD OF MERIT FOR LIFE SAVING
EFFORTS AT A RESIDENTIAL FIRE LOCATED AT THE BROOKSIDE MOTEL ON
DECEMBER 22, 2019.
Chief Don Johnson presented the Chief’s Award of Merit and challenge coin to Vicky Lommel
for her life savings efforts on December 22, 2019.
FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE. Chief Don Johnson presented the
November and December monthly fire department statistics for staffing, calls for service,
training, assistance to other cities, and work being done by the Fire Marshal’s office. Lt. Lance
Pearce reviewed the December monthly statistics regarding calls for service, arrest and citation
summary, training, staffing, and community relations update before introducing Sergeant Nate
Mueller.
AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS.
Charlie Howley introduced Jon Horn with Kimley-Horn and Associates, project manager for the
project, who presented an overview of the project and bidding process. Mayor Ryan asked for
clarification of the opening and closing of the road to through traffic and bid alternate #1.
Resolution #2020-05: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded
that the City Council approves a resolution awarding the CSAH 101 Improvement
construction contract to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. including Alternate #1. All voted in
favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0.
AWARD OF BIDS FOR POWERS BOULEVARD/LAKE LUCY ROAD PEDESTRIAN
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
City Council Summary – January 27, 2020
3
George Bender presented the staff report on this item and introduced Tom Danielson with Bolton
and Menk, the consulting engineer for the project.
Resolution #2020-06: Coleman moved, Campion seconded that the City Council approves
a Joint Powers Agreement with Carver County to construct the Lake Lucy Road/Powers
Boulevard Pedestrian Improvement Project and adopts a resolution awarding the low bid
received in the amount of $743,763.10 to Valley Paving. All voted in favor and the motion
carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0.
AWARD OF BIDS FOR POTHOLE PATCHING IN 2020.
Charlie Howley presented the staff report on this item. Councilman McDonald commented that
he would like the project to get finished sooner than June rather than the proposed August.
Mayor Ryan shared her concern with not waiting until August to get the potholes filled because
council members will be hearing about it sooner than that. After comments from council
members the following motion was made.
Resolution #2020-07: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that
the City Council approves a not to exceed contract of $60,000 to Northwest Asphalt Inc. for
2020 pothole patching. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote
of 4 to 0.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None.
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None.
Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to adjourn the meeting.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City
Council meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Prepared by Nann Opheim
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
JANUUARY 27, 2020
Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to
the Flag.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman McDonald, Councilman
Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Tjornhom
STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Charlie Howley, George
Bender, Chief Don Johnson, Lt. Lance Pearce, and Roger Knutson
PUBLIC PRESENT:
Tom Danielson Bolten & Menk
Mayor Ryan: Again good evening everybody and welcome to our council meeting. To those
that are watching at home or livestreaming from the Chanhassen website, thank you for joining
us. For the record we have one council member absent tonight. Councilwoman Bethany
Tjornhom with an excused absence. Our first action is our agenda approval. Council members
are there any modifications to the agenda as printed? If not we will proceed with the published
agenda.
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: INVITATION TO FEBRUARY FESTIVAL.
Mayor Ryan: First up we have a public announcement and that’s an invitation to our February
Festival. The City of Chanhassen is proud to announce the first community event of 2020. The
27th Annual February Festival. This is the first in a year long series of special events that are
sponsored by the City of Chanhassen, local service organizations and the local business
community. February Festival, I’m going to shorten that to Feb Fest because that’s how we all
know it as, Feb Fest will be held on Saturday, February 1st and I invite area residents, their
families and friends to join us on Lake Ann. Events begin at 12:00 noon and include ice skating,
sledding, horse drawn wagon rides, dog sled rides, the list continues snow shoeing, fat tire bike
demos, kick sled demos, bonfires, a kids scavenger hunt and always of course the popular ice
fishing contest. Hot food and concessions will be sold on the ice by the Rotary Club of
Chanhassen. Boy Scout Troop 330 will be selling live bait and S’mores kits and the ice fishing
contest will run from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. and includes over $6,000 in prizes. Each Feb Fest
attendee will receive one free door price ticket at the event for a chance to win over $3,000 in
door prizes. Ice fishing tickets are $10 per person and are available online at the City’s Feb Fest
page and at city hall. So for more information watch the Chanhassen Villager or visit the City’s
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
2
website and I look forward to seeing you there. How thick is the ice? Where is Mr. Hoffman?
Is he here? It’s over 12 inches. He always has the stats for us so but we hope you can be there.
It’s a great, great event.
CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded
to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s
recommendations:
1. Approve City Council Minutes dated January 13, 2020
2. Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated December 20, 2019
3. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated December 10, 2019
4. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated December 10, 2019
5. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated December 3, 2019
6. Receive Senior Commission Minutes dated November 15, 2019
7. Receive Environmental Commission Minutes dated November 13, 2019
8. Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans and Specifications for The Park 2nd
Addition
9. Resolution #2020-03: Approve Ratifying Changes to Chanhassen Fire Relief
Association Bylaws
10. Approve Extension of Agreement to Allow an Auto Repair Garage on Property Zoned
Planned Unit Development (PUD), 7900 Kerber Boulevard, Douglas Hansen
11. Resolution #2020-04: Appoint Election Judges for State Presidential Primary Election
and Approve Rates of Pay
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. CHIEF’S AWARD OF MERIT FOR LIFE SAVING
EFFORTS AT A RESIDENTIAL FIRE LOCATED AT THE BROOKSIDE MOTEL ON
DECEMBER 22, 2019.
Mayor Ryan: Next up Chief.
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
3
Chief Don Johnson: Good evening Mayor and council. Tonight we’re here to honor one of our
citizens and if I can ask Vicky Lommel to come up and stand with me. She’s probably not going
to like that much but, so on December 22nd about 5:00 in the morning we were started for a
structure fire on the south end of town. First arriving units we had a fully involved residence and
through the investigation we met Vicky where Vicky actually heard some noises from outside
which we now know was the smoke alarms from the residents affected with the fire. Vicky
could have stopped right there. Called 911 and just got the fire service and stayed where she was
at but she actually took the time to go across to the neighbor’s house and start knocking on doors
so at that point was able to get both residents out of the home. And if I go back to why we’re
offering her, or awarding her today with a Fire Chief’s Award of Merit, what you did that
morning potentially saved lives so whether those folks could have got out on their own, I don’t
know but I know in 2014 somebody wasn’t able to get out on their own so I commend you and
your actions for being involved and taking the extra steps to go over and make sure that your
neighbors were saved so we’ve got a small award for you for a lifesaving award and a Chief’s
Award of Merit as well as one our challenge coins that you can, it’s a little hard to carry around
most the time to remember your actions.
Vicky Lommel: Thank you.
Chief Don Johnson: So than you for taking those steps.
Vicky Lommel: Thank you very much.
Mayor Ryan: Ms. Lommel I’m going to embarrass you for 30 more seconds but you may stay
seated if you want. I just on behalf of council I’d like to say a few words. When we first heard
about what you did it was certainly moving and you truly epitomize really what the City of
Chanhassen is all about. Neighbors looking after each other and so we just want to say thanks
and with great appreciation to you for your selfless act in saving your neighbors life so thank you
again on behalf of City Council and the residents of Chanhassen for your selfless act of kindness
and care and truly just being you so thank you very much and congratulations on this most
deserved award. Thank you.
FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE.
Mayor Ryan: Chief if you’d like to continue.
Chief Don Johnson: Okay. Good evening. This is my update for potentially November and
December. Staffing remains at 42 of 45 firefighters. We did have a 7 year firefighter resign
effective December 31st. We are proud to say that 2 of our probationary firefighters are now
done with their training and actually hitting duty crews and working on the trucks so
congratulations to them. It was a year long experience between being in EMT training and all of
their fire training. The fire department responded to 84 calls in November and 86 calls in
December with a total for 2019 of being 1,002 representing an 8.8 percent increase up from 2018
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
4
so I appreciate our staff and their ability to continue to manage these increases. We have seen 8
to 9, 10 percent increases over the year. Over the years. Last 5 at least. Our call breakdowns we
had 15 chief only calls, 95 day only calls, 267 duty crew calls for the year and 625 general
alarms. Out of those 2 months there was 106 rescue EMS calls with 11 motor vehicle accidents.
8 fire responses including 3 building fire. Brookside fire, the Pima Lane fire which happened to
be on the same day and then a mutual aid request from Eden Prairie. One cooking fire, 3 car
fires and 1 outside equipment fire all in November and December. Training continued through
the end of the year with EMS training, officer training and pre-plans of the new Life Time
Corporate 2 building. Our Engine 1 training, hazardous materials training and then our annual
fire department training on January 13th. Again appreciative of our staff. Staffing both
Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year’s Eve for do it with duty crews which both
gives us outstanding response to the community but then lets some of the rest of the department
take those evenings off and not have to worry about calls so again our crews are stepping up
more than they have. We staffed New Year’s Eve with Paisley Park. January 6th our Engine 1
went in service so again thanks to council and city leadership for ensuring that our equipment is
where it needs to be to respond to the community. Assisted Watertown, I assisted Watertown
Fire with incident command training and the Minnesota Fire Chiefs Association with the Howard
Lake Fire Department line of duty death funeral for Chief Drusch. So and then we should be
expecting our ISO report. Alan and I have been working with ISO which we have to do every 5
years to present our capabilities as a fire department, as a city. For those that aren’t aware our
ISO score actually affects both commercial and residential insurance so the better we do as a fire
department in our rankings the lower insurance rates we give to our community so one of the
things that we had in 2015 that you’ve helped correct was apparatus equipment was a lot of our
stuff was aged out past those recommendations. Our expansion of the duty crews also helped
with that and will help our overall response time so I would expect our score to stay where it’s at
or go lower than where it’s at, and hopefully again that helps our community out as well so.
Some of the bigger projects that the fire marshal’s office has been working on is Tequila
Butcher. Obviously that was, most of these projects come at us pretty heavy the last week when
they’re trying to get open so thanks to Fire Marshal Nutter and the flexibility in his schedule.
Working with Gedney Pickle right now on some options down there and we’re also continuing to
work with the crew remodeling spaces in the city so that’s pretty much what’s going on for the
fire department. I can stand for questions.
Mayor Ryan: Thank you Chief. Council any questions? Well thank you and thank you all for
being here tonight. I know you’re here in support of the award tonight so thank you for coming
in on your night off to be a part of the honor and award that we gave Ms. Lommel so thank you
for being here tonight and thank you for what you do every single day so we appreciate it.
Thank you Chief.
Chief Don Johnson: Thanks.
Mayor Ryan: Lieutenant.
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
5
Lt. Lance Pearce: Madam Mayor, council. I’m going to cover December’s activity. In
December we had 767 patrol related calls. 32 of Group A crimes. Mostly categorized as theft
and fraud and 13 Group B crimes. We had 192 traffic stops. We responded to 61 property
damage and personal injury crashes which most were weather related. Arrest and citations, we
had 27 arrests and issued 100 citations in the month of December. Of note we had 5 DUI arrests
and 4 arrests for counterfeiting and forgery. Training update. There was no department training
in December but currently all of our deputies are attending emergency vehicle operations course
and that’s required by the post board every 5 years so we’re going to try something new this
time. We typically do that in the summer months but since our winters are so long we’re going
to try in January. And then we’re also doing our required medical training for all of our licensed
staff as well. Community relations update. The sheriff’s office graduated 10 people from the
fall Citizen’s Academy which graduated on December 5th and our spring academy dates are out
right now and they’ll take place February 27th through April 30th. Thursday nights from 6:00 to
9:00 p.m. mostly at the sheriff’s office in Chaska and we’re taking applications until February
17th. We should get that on the City’s social media this week. Staffing update. We are a full
staff in Chanhassen and one of my partners is here tonight. I’d like to introduce Sergeant Nate
Mueller. If he wants to stand up that’d be great. I promised him I wouldn’t make him do a
speech so I won’t make him do a speech. He’s a newly promoted Sergeant. He’s been with the
County for almost 16 years now and he is our department canine so we’ll have a canine unit
assigned to the city of Chanhassen for this year. So that’s Nate.
Mayor Ryan: Nate welcome.
Lt. Lance Pearce: And no speech, no speech Nate.
Mayor Ryan: The name of the canine.
Sgt. Nate Mueller: It’s Ringo.
Mayor Ryan: Ringo, okay.
Lt. Lance Pearce: He’s pretty small so. I stand for questions.
Mayor Ryan: Council any questions? No. And Lieutenant I know you’re working on your
annual report. Will that come back to council in February.
Lt. Lance Pearce: I’m waiting to get a date from City Manager but yes it’s 99 percent done so.
Mayor Ryan: Perfect. Alright. Thank you.
Lt. Lance Pearce: Okay thank you much.
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
6
Mayor Ryan: Thank you. And since I’m off to a rocky start in 2020 with skipping over things,
we’ll fall back to the visitor presentation. I know that was on for Chief to give the award but if
there’s, I’ll follow due diligence if there is anybody here that would like to address council on a
matter that is not specifically on the agenda, please step to the podium. Provide your name and
address for the record and then please address the council. You have 5 minutes to present your
item. If your action, or request includes an action from staff or council please complete a citizen
action request form so that we are clear on what you are asking and can appropriately follow up.
Is there anybody here for a visitor presentation? Okay.
AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS.
Mayor Ryan: Next on our agenda is new business. The first one up is the award construction
contract for Highway 101 improvements.
Charlie Howley: Thank you Madam Mayor, councilors. We’re here to talk about 101. I have
here with me Jon Horn from our consultant Kimley-Horn. He’s going to run through a brief
power point to introduce this topic but is generally to move to the next step and hopefully award
some bids and get some shovels in the ground here so with that Jon I’ll advance the slides for
you. If you want.
Jon Horn: Okay. Good evening Mayor and council. As Charlie said my name’s Jon Horn with
Kimley-Horn and Associates. I’m the project manager for the Highway 101 improvements
project. The action before you this evening is the culmination of many years of effort to get to
the point where we’re ready to build this section of highway 101. So the proposed motion is to
approve a resolution awarding the CSAH 101 improvement construction contract to S.M.
Hentges including bid alternate number 1. That does require a simple majority vote of the
members present this evening. But before we do that I wanted to provide a little bit of project
background. Just a reminder on the scope of the project. Talk a little bit about construction
phasing, staging. We’ve been doing a fair amount of public engagement and there’s still more
plans so I want to touch on that. Touch on right-of-way and easement acquisition. I’ll give you
a summary of the bid results and talk a little bit about project funding. So just an overview of the
project. The graphic shows the construction. It’s a little over a mile of roadway from Pioneer
Trail to Flying Cloud Drive so basically Pioneer Trail’s on the right side of the exhibit. It’s a 4
lane divided roadway extending the length of the corridor from Pioneer to Flying Cloud. In
addition we’re urbanizing the corridor so the blue dots you see on the graphic are stormwater
facilities that will be built to treat and retain stormwater in the project area. A big part of the
project in addition to providing for motor vehicles is to provide for a safer bicycle and pedestrian
access so the project does include the construction of trails along both sides of 101 from Pioneer
Trail to about the mid point of Creekwood and then a trail on one side because of the difficult
grades in the corridor that would run all the way down to Flying Cloud Drive. In addition there’s
two pedestrian bridges and a pedestrian underpass to provide grade separated crossings of 101 to
really provide better access as well as safety for bikes and pedestrians in the corridor. The City’s
primary investment in this is utilities so we’re extending watermain that currently stops at
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
7
Pioneer Trail. Extending that down to Flying Cloud Drive to provide for future development
along the corridor. In addition we’re extending sanitary sewer main to provide for the future
installation of sanitary sewer. Ultimately sanitary sewer service would require the construction
of a lift station down near Flying Cloud Drive. That is not included as a part of this project but
we’re basically providing for the future installation of that facility. One of the innovative things
we looked at as a part of the project, because of the steep grades coming down the bluff certainly
the grades are safer than they are today but there still was some concerns about how do we
maintain that and how do we continue to make sure that’s safe so we looked at an automatic anti-
icing system that would basically be installed and what that would consist of is a weather station
that would monitor weather. There would be sensors that would be placed in the pavement to
detect temperatures of the pavement. There would basically be an automated chemical injection
system that would send it to some spray heads that would ultimately allow the deicing chemicals
to be placed on the pavement. So rather than having trucks and manual application of those
materials we looked at a potentially use of a scenario that would provide for an automated
system to be able to do that. Because of the cost of the project and overall cost of this
technology this piece was bid as a part of a bid alternate to the project and I’ll touch on that here
in a little bit. Construction phasing staging. Big project. Because of the size of the project and
the need to maintain access to existing businesses and residents in the area we’re actually
looking at a two season construction schedule. Phase 1 would be the southerly part of the project
from Flying Cloud Drive to the mid point at Creekwood Drive so that would be built in 2020.
The roadway would then be opened back up to traffic during the winter months of 2020 and
2021 and then in 2021 the roadway get closed again and the northerly piece from Creekwood up
to Pioneer Trail would be constructed. We would be closing the roadway to through traffic. As
a result of that there would need to be a detour route established so the way that’s going to work
is traffic would be detoured along county roadways. Flying Cloud Drive. Audubon Road and
then back up to Pioneer Trail so while the roadway is shut down we’ll still be maintaining local
access but through traffic would be detoured along this route. In terms of the schedule, some
things have already happened. If you recall council did award a contract for building demolition
back in November so there’s been 6 buildings that have been removed from the project corridor
to prepare for the roadway construction so that work is done. We anticipate the construction will
start in early March so the first thing the contractor is being asked to do is take care of all the tree
removal along the corridor so that would happen. A majority of that work would happen in
March. We don’t anticipate 101 being closed to through traffic until the June timeframe. One of
the reasons for that is we need to make sure that Flying Cloud Drive is re-opened and right now
Carver County is anticipating that would occur in the June timeframe so we have some
conditions as a part of our specifications that our contractor cannot close 101 until Flying Cloud
Drive is open. But they would then hit the project hard in 2020 to do that southerly piece. We
have an interim completion date in November of 2020 for the southerly piece as I said. The
roadway would then be opened back up to traffic. Closed down again in the spring of 2021 with
an ultimate completion date of October 2021 for all construction. I mentioned the public
engagements. So we’re had property owner meetings. You’ve had a couple open houses. We
do want to provide another opportunity for people in the project corridor to know more about the
project before we proceed to construction so we’re having a construction open house that’s
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
8
scheduled for February 19th at the Recreation Center from 6:00 to 7:30. Invitations for that
meeting will be going out early next week to property owners in the corridor just to make sure
everybody knows what’s happening and we provided a mechanism for them to learn a little bit
more about the project. And then right-of-way easement acquisition has been a big part of this
project. Back in November the council did authorize eminent domain for a number of parcels so
we’ve been continuing to make progress on acquiring parcels. We are in position that by the end
of February we will have all the right-of-way secured that will be necessary for the construction
of the project so right-of-way team’s been very busy trying to make sure all that work is done
prior to construction start. So what happens when we receive bids? We received bids back on
December 13th. We actually opened bids on Friday, December 13th. I don’t know why but it
worked out okay. We did receive 6 bids. Engineer’s estimate was a little bit over $18.5 million
dollars. Our low bidder was S.M. Hentges and Sons with a base bid amount of a little over $16.2
so about 13 percent under engineer’s estimate so we did receive good competitive bids. I
mentioned the bid alternate. So for the anti-icing system we looked at two scenarios. One
basically to install all the conduits in place to allow that anti-icing system to be installed in the
future. The bid alternate price for that was $162,000. We also looked at the cost to install the
complete anti-icing system and that came in at $1.4 million dollars. The way the funding for
those is set up is that’s entirely the responsibility of Carver County. Carver County staff did
some analysis in terms of funding that was available and cost benefit of installing that system
and staff’s recommendation to the county board was that they proceed with bid alternate 1. To
install the conduit system at this time. Not install the full system. Basically give the project an
opportunity to go through a winter season. See how it performs. If necessary then pursue some
potential grant funding to allow that system to be installed so right now the County’s
recommendation was to proceed with bid alternate 1 and not to install the complete anti-icing
system. So project costs and funding. Basically on that construction cost as well as all the
indirect costs and right-of-way acquisition is a little over $29 million dollars. A majority of the
funding for the project is coming from State and County funds. The City’s responsibilities are
allocated only to the utilities to be installed along the corridor which is a little over $2 million
dollars. Interestingly enough the original estimate that was put together back in 2015 for the
City’s component of this project was $2 million dollars so ultimately as a part of the delivery of
the project the actual costs established based upon actual bid prices are very close to those costs
that were estimated back in 2015. I mentioned the Carver County Board so we did go to Carver
County Board back on January 21st to get their input prior to tonight’s meeting. They did concur
with the bid award and also recommended to proceed forward as recommended by their staff to
include bid alternate 1 as a part of the project and to wait on the installation of the overall anti-
icing system until a future date. So again the motion tonight before you is to approve a
resolution awarding the construction contract to S.M. Hentges including bid alternate number 1.
I guess with that we’ll stand for questions.
Mayor Ryan: Great. Thank you. Council any questions? I just have a couple Mr. Horn. When
you talk about just from a logistics standpoint when you open and close. So you said you’ll open
it in the winter time just to, for free flowing traffic back up again totally to anyone that wants to
use it?
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
9
Jon Horn: Correct. The concern was that having it shut down over the winter months with
traffic control devices and things out there and maintenance was going to be difficult. Also the
concern about not maintaining through traffic during the winter months so basically the way the
schedule and phasing is set up is that we get to November. South half will be done. We’ll tie
into the existing north piece and then re-open the roadway back to through traffic so it won’t be a
full like year and a half of roadway closure. It will be two chunks of roadway closure with full
access inbetween.
Mayor Ryan: And not that it happens in construction often but if the weather is bad and you get
behind and it doesn’t, it doesn’t get completed to the necessary, you just, you keep working until
complete? I mean is there a possibility that it could stay closed the whole time? I mean that is a
possibility correct?
Jon Horn: Yeah. A lot of concerns about that and one of the things we looked at is it possible to
build this project in one construction season. We thought it was really a difficult squeeze to do
that but we feel the way we set it up is providing a little bit of flexibility in terms of the amount
of time we have available to get the various pieces done so that was kind of the reason to do it in
two chunks. We felt it was important to try to maintain that roadway being open over the winter
months and by breaking it into two years it allowed us some comfort that we would be able to
accomplish that.
Mayor Ryan: Okay but if you got behind and you had to keep working through is that still an
option that you’re considering that you would just keep powering through and?
Jon Horn: And it is possible. We have not had a chance to sit down with the contractor yet so
after the contract is awarded tonight we’ll certainly have conversations with the contractor. They
might have some other ideas in terms of how they want to proceed with the project. They may
have some desire to get more work done in 2020 but one of the challenges is that we’ve got, you
know we’ve got the golf course out there. We’ve got a number of residents. This is their only
way in and out so it’s critical that we figure out a way to maintain access and we’re trying to be
pretty conservative in terms of making sure we do that because they have no other choice. If
101’s not open there’s no other way to get in and out.
Mayor Ryan: Perfect. And then in terms of the open house I know you said you send mailers to
the directly impacted residents but it is open to the public so anyone that wants to attend and get
some more information can obviously attend that open house.
Jon Horn: Yep. So we’ll do a direct mailer and we’ll get it out on the City’s website and
provide information for the general public for those people that are indirectly in the corridor so
they’ll still be able to attend.
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
10
Mayor Ryan: Perfect. And the last question I have, I really appreciate your presentation is, I’m
a little bit confused what on the alternative number 1 is. So is it just setting up the system so if,
if things come in again below that they’ll do it or just, I know you said they’ll see how the winter
goes. What is a conduit? Just setting up the systems or just putting money in place as a holder.
Jon Horn: Yeah so there’s basically pipes that we need to put in under the roadway. It’s kind of
like putting an irrigation system in.
Mayor Ryan: Oh okay.
Jon Horn: So we’re basically putting all the sleeves in that would be necessary to install the
irrigation system in as a future date because basically the way the system is set up is that we’d
have a building that would house the chemical tanks that would then be piping that would run all
the way up the roadway corridor, up the bluff and that is intended to run down the center median
of the roadway so we would basically be putting the conduit systems in place so if they did
install the system in the future the conduits would be there and it would be a lot easier to install
the system in the future versus trying to do it from scratch if we don’t put the conduits in the
roadway.
Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you.
Jon Horn: You bet.
Councilman Campion: If I can follow up on that too. If it’s down the center would you have to
tear up the road then to? No.
Jon Horn: Yeah so basically a concrete barrier that runs up the middle of the roadway and all of
the conduits and access for that system would be installed down that center median so basically
we’re putting in all the facilities. They would just need to put all the guts in. We’re kind of
putting the plumbing in and they need to put the guts in in the future.
Councilman Campion: Okay.
Mayor Ryan: Great. It’s hard to believe is, we’re this close. After a lot of years of conversation
and hard work so. Council I would stand for a motion.
Councilman Campion: I’ll make a motion.
Mayor Ryan: Mr. Campion.
Councilman Campion: I make a motion that the City Council approves a resolution awarding the
CSAH 101 Improvement construction contract to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. including
Alternate #1.
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
11
Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second?
Councilwoman Coleman: I’ll second.
Resolution #2020-05: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded
that the City Council approves a resolution awarding the CSAH 101 Improvement
construction contract to S.M. Hentges and Sons, Inc. including Alternate #1. All voted in
favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0.
Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 4-0.
AWARD OF BIDS FOR POWERS BOULEVARD/LAKE LUCY ROAD PEDESTRIAN
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
Charlie Howley: Madam Mayor, councilors, again I’m going to have George introduce this
project to you and our design engineer from Bolton and Menk. He has a lot more experience
with the history of this than I do so I’ll step back and let George take over.
Mayor Ryan: Great thank you.
George Bender: Good evening. Moving forward we’ll tackle the pedestrian crossing at Powers
Boulevard and Lake Lucy. We’ll discuss the project bidding and joint powers agreement
tonight. I’d also like to introduce, this is Tom Danielson with Bolton and Menk. He’s the design
engineer for the project. This is a quick exhibit just to show where we’re at in the limits so it
essentially ties in at Lake Lucy Road and it’s along Powers Boulevard. It gives us length to
make the transitions that we need and the expansion of the roadway to facilitate the intersection
improvements. This is a more detailed exhibit of the improvements that will be made. It
includes turn lanes for the intersection. Center median on the north side of the intersection right
here in the red. This is the actual crossing that will be, and I have better pictures of that later in
the presentation to give an example of what that will look like. There’s additional shouldering
and trail improvements on the east side of the project. I want to give a little bit of background on
the project as this part is, needs a little explanation. City Council approved an original JPA for
this project back in March 26, 2018. That was primarily to study the project. At that time two
intersections were being studied. Also at Powers Boulevard and Park Road was being
considered. Tonight we’re requesting a revised JPA to be approved and the major changes to
that JPA is it puts the City of Chanhassen as the lead agency where the original one had the
County as the lead agency. In order to help move this project forward the County did not have
staff availability at that time to move this forward so the City offered to take that on to drive the
schedule. Another important part is the original JPA had some items where the City was
contributing more than 50/50. It was 75/25 to certain items and now it’s a true 50/50 cost share
between the County and the City. And then the JPA also clarified that this project will include
the one crossing at Lake Lucy Road and Powers Boulevard and not include the one at Park Road.
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
12
So this was recently opened. Bids were recently opened on January 7th and 5 bids were received
as you can view here with Valley Paving being the low bidder. They won the job over GMH
Asphalt by a whopping $637 so bids were tight which you know gives us confidence that good
bids were received. For a cost summary, for a more holistic view we have the amount of the
construction bid in there. We have the contract that was awarded to Bolton and Menk. The
amount there which includes also the amendment that was previously approved for a total of a
little over $834,000 and if we split that cost it will be about $417,000. A little bit over for the
County and the City. The City is planning on using their State Aid funds to fully fund this
project. I put a quick summary in here. This is the, you’ve seen this before. It’s our MSA fund
projection and I highlighted the change that previously had said $350,000. This now reflects
what our fund projection would look at with increasing this to approximately $420,000. And
when I was here for the Lyman item this is very similar to that discussion on the 13th. So this is
probably the best slide of the presentation. It gives everybody a visualization of what this
actually looks like now and what it can look like after if the project is approved. It details the
safety improvements of the additional turn lanes and the, what’s called the RRFB system that
will be on the north side of the intersection that flashes when pedestrian activates the system with
a push button on the pole. If this project moves forward it would be constructed in 3 stages. The
first stage would be the expansion on the western side of the system and that’s expected to take
about 4 weeks. The second stage would be working on the east side of the Powers Boulevard
and that is expected to be the longest duration of the stage at about 6 weeks. And then the center
median would go in in the third stage and that’s expected to take I believe about 3 weeks.
Northbound and southbound traffic will be maintained throughout construction. During some of
the stages there will be closures of Lake Lucy Road to allow for the tie in’s. And then there will
be closures of the turn lanes as well during the project in various stages so there will be a local
detour set up for local traffic along Carver Beach Road. This is the motion that’s in your council
report to award the project and approve the revised JPA and at this time we’ll stand for
questions.
Mayor Ryan: Great, thank you Mr. Bender. Council any questions?
Councilman Campion: I have a minor question. So it sounds like the low bids were you know
pretty close within $600 and some dollars.
George Bender: Yep.
Councilman Campion: And then it lists the design fees and all that which were you know fairly
significant. I assume those were the same between the bidders or?
George Bender: The design fees have already been approved by council so when we went and
awarded the consultant contract for Bolton and Menk to prepare the plans.
Councilman Campion: Okay, alright so those were truly separate from the bids?
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
13
George Bender: Yes. Yep.
Councilman Campion: Alright.
Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council, in designing this interchange we, our typical process is we have
a pool of engineers that we work with. In this case Bolton & Menk was selected based on their
knowledge and experience and also how they planned the project and also cost estimate in how
they allocated those dollars as a part of the process of designing, meeting with neighbors and
staff meetings so based on that staff recommended going with Bolton & Menk at the, at the
estimate that they provided. And typically they were probably the low estimate of the two
consultants that we got estimates from.
George Bender: Yep.
Todd Gerhardt: And so we solicit quotes from at least two of those pooled candidates for each
project.
Councilman Campion: Okay thank you.
George Bender: Yep.
Mayor Ryan: And there’s no, I know at one point there was some discussion around no tree
removal or, is there any actual change to the street that we’re going to be going into the
properties right along Powers?
George Bender: Do you want to handle that one?
Tom Danielson: Sure. So there was originally a plan to take out 2 trees one of which is really
close to the property in the northwest corner. That tree, the tree in question has been left and the
only one being removed is currently dead so.
Mayor Ryan: Okay.
Tom Danielson: So the property owner’s willing to say go. He’s kind of satisfied with it.
Mayor Ryan: Right.
Tom Danielson: And the only reason that it really needs to go is to make room in that corner for
the new sidewalk with the addition of the center medina the road does widen in that area.
Mayor Ryan: Okay. And then if you could go back to that, George if you don’t mind, the
picture of what the intersection is going to look like. You just passed it. No the pretty one. Are
those lights going to be, is that part of the fixture?
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
14
Tom Danielson: The ones up above?
Mayor Ryan: Yes.
Tom Danielson: Yes.
Mayor Ryan: Those are, okay. And then you know I know you’re familiar with kind of the sight
lines. It’s a little challenging at that intersection. Are those, you know that left, the left turns
whether you’re going north or south and you’re kind of head on, that’s what, you’re not really
changing any of the striping on the streets so people will be familiar with the traffic change to
some degree?
Tom Danielson: Correct. We’re not changing how traffic actually flows but the addition of the
center median does allow the northbound left turn movements to move farther to the west which
does give them a little bit better sight line than traffic coming from the north so.
Mayor Ryan: Okay. Okay.
Tom Danielson: Some of that is alleviated but generally the traffic pattern doesn’t change.
Mayor Ryan: They’re the same, okay. Council any further questions? No, with that. Did you
have one Mr. Campion?
Councilman Campion: No.
Mayor Ryan: Alright with that I would stand for a motion.
Councilwoman Coleman: I’ll make the motion.
Mayor Ryan: Great, Ms. Coleman.
Councilwoman Coleman: The City Council approves a Joint Powers Agreement with Carver
County to construct the Lake Lucy Road/Powers Boulevard Pedestrian Improvement Project and
adopts a resolution awarding the low bid received in the amount of $743,763.10 to Valley
Paving.
Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second?
Councilman Campion: Second.
Resolution #2020-06: Coleman moved, Campion seconded that the City Council approves
a Joint Powers Agreement with Carver County to construct the Lake Lucy Road/Powers
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
15
Boulevard Pedestrian Improvement Project and adopts a resolution awarding the low bid
received in the amount of $743,763.10 to Valley Paving. All voted in favor and the motion
carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0.
Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 4-0. Thank you. Appreciate it.
AWARD OF BIDS FOR POTHOLE PATCHING IN 2020.
Mayor Ryan: Alright and the last item on our agenda for new business is the award of bids for
pothole patching in 2020.
Todd Gerhardt: Do you have any questions of the contractor for the last item?
Charlie Howley: Alright Madam Mayor, council members, this one I am presenting on so it’ll be
my first one for you so take it easy on me.
Mayor Ryan: We’ve got a lot of questions. You’re in the hot seat now.
Charlie Howley: I am, I am. No power point. This is pretty rudimentary. It’s my understanding
that particularly last year, maybe in previous years that when our city crews normally go out and
fill potholes they’re limited to our own crews and how much time it takes and how bad the roads
are and how many we have to do and last year it took us you know almost into November I think
to get it done so my predecessors or somebody in the streets department thought well can we
kind of farm out and sub out some of this to get it done quicker and generally I think that’s,
that’s what this item is all about. So the Charlie, our Street Superintendent reached out to a
number of blacktop companies. Asphalt contractors and got quotes and how it worked was we
kind of set a budget number of okay here’s how much we’re comfortable spending and that was
$60,000. Can you get it done because we showed them a map of all the roads that we would
assign to them that then our staff would do the rest of the city and that map was generated based
on severity. Level of traffic. Keeping them kind of located in the same general area so they’re
not hopping all over town so we got some quotes in from various contractors and Charlie did the
math. Worked backwards and the Northwest Asphalt as shown in the staff report was the low
bidder and they’re a reputable company. Certainly have used them in the past and are happy
with their work so what we’re asking for is hiring them for a not to exceed amount of $60,000 to
just hit them and hit them hard and get them done. We have a department goal to have all the
potholes done by August 15th. That’s our goal and that’s what we’re planning on doing. Which
is much better than November, right? So the money would come out of our pavement
management annual budget which I believe is $393,000 roughly and so essentially that means
our budget for that is now $363,000 to do the other stuff that we do so we’re not asking for more
money. We’re just asking to do a more aggressive pothole patching. I think this is a direct
response to what we heard from the residents. So I think that kind of about covers it. There’s
motion in your packets and if you have any other questions I’d be happy to answer them.
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
16
Mayor Ryan: Go ahead Councilman McDonald.
Councilman McDonald: The idea came from City Council.
Charlie Howley: Alright.
Councilman McDonald: We were the ones that pushed for it. I’m still not totally happy with
this. I think you’re taking too long. If you’re going to hire a subcontractor I would like to see
those numbers pushed in a lot quicker than either June or August. We were told August last
year and it moved to November. I understand this is not an easy problem to jump on and you
know that was why we said what’s it going to take to get it done and I guess I was looking for
was something that we could get back on top of these a lot quicker than what we were doing and
I would like to see it done quicker than June. I mean pothole seasons starts what? End of
March. Something like that when, or maybe the middle of April, whenever the last snow storm
decides to hit or something and that was the reason for getting subcontractors who could
basically just do this and nothing else. Is it possible do you think to move some of these dates in
and to get things done a little bit quicker?
Charlie Howley: I can certainly ask. I can’t make a commitment to that now.
Councilman McDonald: That’s fine.
Charlie Howley: I think the way that they bid this out is, you know one crew working full days
and how many days would it take to do everything that’s on that map. Could we ask them to do
two crews and shorten that up? I don’t know. We’d have to revisit that. That would mean they
would have to submit new bids and things along these lines so I can certainly ask but I can’t
make that promise tonight that we could be done by June to get everything done on that map.
Councilman McDonald: Okay. I’m speaking mainly for me. I guess and you start talking about
having to rebid it and everything. I would have to defer to my other councilmembers on that but
that was just something that again last year when we were looking at this it was pretty bad and I
don’t know, this year may not be that bad. You know the winter’s been pretty mild so yeah
maybe it’s possible just natural effects you’ll get done quicker than that because there’ll be fewer
potholes but yeah I really wanted to see a more aggressive approach to this so that’s my position.
I’ll yield back to the council.
Charlie Howley: Madam Mayor if I can add one more thing.
Mayor Ryan: Go ahead, sure.
Charlie Howley: I think a good rule of thumb of when we would start pothole patching would be
when road restrictions are off. When the frost is out of the ground. You’ve got to get that
moisture out of the ground. That’s the enemy. That’s what’s causing the potholes so we don’t
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
17
want to get too early otherwise it’s just, it’s a temporary thing and when we do a pothole patch
we want to kind of make it somewhat permanent. Something that’s not going to fall apart in a
week or two so I would say late April is when you might start this program and yeah, it’s good to
know that the expectation is June and not August but that’s before my time and I guess I didn’t
have that history so I apologize but all I can so is ask and push.
Councilman McDonald: Okay well thank you. I appreciate it.
Mayor Ryan: Councilman, yea go ahead.
Todd Gerhardt: If I could add to this. Last year construction season we did a total
reconstruction on the north side of Minnewashta and this year we’re planning on doing an
extensive mill and overlay and those are the areas that are in desperate need of where you’re
going to see most of the potholes. So we’re going to cover a lot of area where you saw a lot of
the potholes last year with the mill and overlays and then once we get two years of those mill and
overlays under our belt I don’t think we’re going to need this program because remember our
graph where we were kind of behind where some of these potholes existed. We get the 2 to 3
years of those mill and overlays we’re going to get caught up so you won’t have to see this
extensive pothole patching. Due to some of the road conditions in the Near Mountain and those
areas that are planned for mill and overlays this coming year that we’re going to come back and
bring back to council for award of bid here in February-March. We’re going to cover a bigger
area so we won’t have this problem in the future.
Mayor Ryan: Mr. Campion did you have a question?
Councilman Campion: It was just a clarifying question. So it looks like we have effectively 10
days of pothole repair in the contract right? Because $5,380 per day. You know so there’s a
little bit over 10 days of work there and that would be between the end of April an the end of
June so they’d, you know it’s not like they just hit it hard for 2 weeks and are done right.
Todd Gerhardt: No our crews will be handling still the majority of the pothole patching.
They’re doing the high traffic areas. What I would say would be slower areas to do pothole
patching in so some along West 78th Street. Where you see high traffic so we gave them the
higher risk areas that usually take longer because of traffic and we’re still going to do more of
the residential low traffic areas and the $363,000 that Charlie talked about also the fund that we
use for our filling of potholes and also the sealcoating and we like to try to do $150,000 to
$200,000 worth of sealcoating out of that account so, so still trying to stay within budget but this
is, that 10 days does give us a leg up because you know it is a high traffic area so we think it’s a
big benefit.
Mayor Ryan: And I mean I’ll add my two cents as well. I think it’s a great start that we’re
addressing this challenge that we faced last year. It really came from a conversation initially
when we were talking about the franchise fee and we were hearing as council we were getting a
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
18
lot of emails and phone calls about it’s unacceptable to have potholes sitting there you know
week after week and not getting filled and so it was Councilman McDonald who had asked about
is there, could we bring somebody else in to do, to do something sooner and so we tabled it for
last year and that’s how it came back to this point this year and while I think it’s great that we
want to move forward to address it and you know split the time, I have two concerns. One I
share the concern about waiting until August because we will be hearing about it in June and if
then it becomes July and then they’re still not filled in August we will be getting the phone calls
and emails all summer long about their potholes not being filled. A second part of that is just to
clarify you know when you look at that map, and I know you just touched on it Mr. Gerhardt but
when you look at the map my concern is that people are going to think those are the only pothole
streets that are going to be filled versus that’s what the crew’s going to take and then you know,
then our current employees or staff, street crew will be filling the rest but if there is a way to
continue to move forward with this contract. I don’t know how long was the bid process?
Should we table this to see you know how quickly can we get a second bid if that’s something
that we want to do for two crews to speed up the time.
Roger Knutson: Mayor just to be clear. These aren’t bids. These are technically quotes.
Mayor Ryan: Okay.
Roger Knutson: And nothing has to be published.
Mayor Ryan: That’s right.
Roger Knutson: You can just go out and ask the question.
Mayor Ryan: Oh okay.
Todd Gerhardt: Yeah we could expand on this based on that quote if you want to go more than
10 days and go up to 20 days you can do that this evening and if you think that would speed up
the process and double it.
Mayor Ryan: But where does that take away from what you have planned or projected for other
needs in the city? What does that take away from? I guess that’s what, I mean to make this
decision it’s hard to say double it but then what is it taken away from.
Todd Gerhardt: We’re probably going to have to do a little less sealcoating as a part of that.
This year and try to make it up next year.
Mayor Ryan: And what impact will that have?
Todd Gerhardt: Well hopefully we won’t have as many potholes to fill next year if we get the
number of streets and miles of mill and overlay that we’re doing this year because those are the
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
19
ones that are in the worst condition so you know we still have some streets after, you know I’d
feel more comfortable if we had a couple years under our belt with the mill and overlays that
we’re proposing as a part of our street program in the next 5 years. Then I think we can go back
to our regular schedule and have things done by the 4th and so, but you know this has kind of
been a mild winter too. You know sometimes we lose the potholes that we filled last year when
we’re plowing. It’s tough to keep a pothole filled when moisture gets underneath those fill spots
and moisture gets under there and they pop out. You know the freeze/thaw cycle plays a big
factor in that also so, but I think we can make up that difference.
Mayor Ryan: Council any thoughts on keeping it as is and see how this winter goes? Evaluate it
and then make a determine for next year or does somebody want, are there other suggestions to
do something this year?
Councilman McDonald: Well if I could since maybe I’m the one that’s instigating all of this. Is
it possible to come back to us by middle of May and give us a status? You know at that point the
potholes should be there and you should have some handle on where are we at as far as a
schedule and then I guess we can decide if we need to accelerate it but I really think we ought to
shoot for a better date than even June.
Todd Gerhardt: Yeah the issues I have is that having that locked in this price right now is,
because Northwest, Allied, they’re going to have other projects that are going to fill in outside of
these 10 days and so you know they’ll come back and say well we’ll try to fit you in or we’re
going to have to have an increase due to our schedule and so they may not stand behind this
number. I can’t guarantee you that.
Councilman McDonald: Well by the same token if we don’t need to spend the money how do
we get the money back? I mean once we commit to something, like I say what if the pothole
season just isn’t that bad. I’m just really looking for a plan that okay let’s say it’s as bad as it
was last year. That’s worst case. Hopefully it didn’t get any worst than that. How would you
address that? And then what if it’s maybe a quarter, best case scenario as to the number of
potholes. Then in that case what you’ve got right now could be overkill. I’m just looking for a
plan. How do you address this? Come back and tell us. I wouldn’t want to commit money right
now to say yeah go ahead and tell you need twice and we don’t because as you say we could
spend the money on something more beneficial to the city and I would hate to lose that unless we
need to lose that.
Todd Gerhardt: Well based on that Mayor and council our recommendation is what’s in the staff
report.
Councilman McDonald: Okay. Let’s go with that then.
Mayor Ryan: Alright. Alright any other comments or questions? No? I would stand for a
motion.
Chanhassen City Council – January 27, 2020
20
Councilman McDonald: I’ll make the motion since I caused all the problems with it. I would
propose that the City Council approves a not to exceed contract of $60,000 to Northwest Asphalt
Inc. for a 2020 pothole patching.
Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second?
Councilman Campion: Second.
Resolution #2020-07: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that
the City Council approves a not to exceed contract of $60,000 to Northwest Asphalt Inc. for
2020 pothole patching. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote
of 4 to 0.
COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None.
CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None.
Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to adjourn the meeting.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City
Council meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Prepared by Nann Opheim
CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
JANUARY 27, 2020
Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:05p.m.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilman McDonald, Councilman
Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Tjornhom
STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Charlie Howley, Todd
Hoffman, Greg Sticha, MacKenzie Walters, George Bender, and Chief Don Johnson
ARBORETUM AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE.
Angie Bersaw with Bolton & Menk reviewed information included on poster boards and maps
looking at proposed options for improving Highway 5 to a 4 lane highway from Rolling Acres
Road to Century Boulevard. She discussed details of the focus areas in the study area, timeline
of study results and meetings that have been held since March, 2019, recap of comments
received during neighborhood meetings which focused mainly on getting on and off Highway 5,
and design considerations. A representative from the Arboretum discussed plans to change
ingress and egress to an entrance across from Minnewashta Parkway and exit only from the
current location. George Bender discussed tying the Minnewashta Parkway project with the
Arboretum entrance improvements and associated funding and timing. Angie Bersaw continued
with discussion of Highway 5 improvements indicating the need to improve Highway 5 to 4
lanes with various options for intersection improvements at Minnewashta Parkway, Crimson Bay
Road/Arboretum Drive, and Highway 41. Councilman Campion asked for clarification on the
cost comparisons of the four concepts for the Highway 41 intersection improvements. Angie
Bersaw outline the next steps moving forward with this project through 2020. Mayor Ryan asked
about gathering additional public input moving forward and Carver County commissioner’s
involvement with this project. Lyndon Robjet with Carver County discussed financing options
available for this improvement project. Mayor Ryan asked if the council could be provided cost
estimates before meeting with legislators at their February 4th meeting and the importance for a
signalized intersection at Highway 5 and Minnewashta Parkway.
DISCUSS POTENTIAL AMENDMENT TO PAISLEY PARK PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD).
Karen White with Paisley Park explained proposed changes to the Paisley Park PUD agreement.
Mayor Ryan asked for clarification on the request for holding more community events outside.
Chief Don Johnson explained issues associated with the current PUD regulations. Mayor Ryan
asked for clarification of what’s being requested by Paisley Park. Kate Aanenson clarified it’s
City Council Work Session – January 27, 2020
2
the definition of special events which are limited to 12 per year. Mayor Ryan directed staff to
bring language back to council with a PUD amendment to simplify the process. In discussing
outdoor events Councilman McDonald expressed the need to address parking, pedestrian safety,
and traffic. Mayor Ryan expressed support for Paisley Park but discussed the need for additional
details.
FINALIZE 2020 KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGIES.
Mayor Ryan outlined how staff will proceed with the list. Todd Gerhardt discussed timing
associated with each item. Mayor Ryan informed council members how she has been
responding to residents concerns with the GreenStep program.
Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 6:55 p.m.
Submitted by Todd Gerhardt
City Manager
Prepared by Nann Opheim
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 21, 2020
Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2.
Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:
PROPOSED MOTION
“The City Council receives the Planning Commission Minutes dated January 21, 2020.”
Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.
ATTACHMENTS:
Planning Commission Summary Minutes dated January 21, 2020
Planning Commission Verbatim Minutes dated January 21, 2020
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
SUMMARY MINUTES
JANUARY 21, 2020
Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Randall, John Tietz, Michael McGonagill, Doug
Reeder, and Laura Skistad
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad
STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior
Planner; MacKenzie Walters, Associate Planner; and Erick Henricksen, Project Engineer
PUBLIC PRESENT:
Jessica Galatz HCRRA
PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR AN INTERIM USE PERMIT (IUP) AND WETLAND
ALTERATION PERMIT (WAP) FOR THE PURPOSE OF REPAIRING LANDSLIDES
ALONG A PORTION OF THE MINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAIL.
Erick Henricksen presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Reeder asked about the
slope of the trail. Commissioner McGonagill asked about ownership of the trail and the soil
stability. Jessica Galatz with Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority and Brent Turro
with Barr Engineering discussed details of the project. Chairman Weick opened the public
hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed.
Tietz moved, McGonagill seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission
recommends the City Council approve the Interim Use Permit, Planning Case 2020-01 to
permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as proposed on the plans prepared by
Barr Engineering Co., dated 12/13/2019, subject to the Conditions of Approval and
adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
1. The interim use permit shall be approved for a period of two (2) years from the date of City
Council approval. The applicant will need to request a formal extension 60 days prior to the
expiration date of the interim use permit.
2. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agency must be obtained; including but not limited
to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and
Carver County.
Planning Commission Summary – January 21. 2020
2
3. The applicant must provide the city with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of
110% of the construction costs for the appropriate phase of the grading operations to
guarantee erosion control measures, site restoration, and compliance with the interim use
permit.
4. Documentation and/or load tickets from the approved waste disposal facility where
contaminated soils will be disposed of shall be provided to the city.
5. All required ROW permits, access agreements, and temporary construction easements shall
be secured prior to the commencement of any construction activities.
6. All oversize/overweight loads leaving the site to the east must apply for County
Transportation OS/OW trip permits.
7. Permitted hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday with no work permitted on Sunday or legal holidays.
8. If any excess material is hauled to another site in Chanhassen, a separate grading permit will
be required for the other property.
9. The applicant shall schedule a walk-through of the site with city staff to review boundary
staking and removals of edge trees prior to any activity commencing.
10. The applicant shall identify conservation easement boundary on site. Vegetation within the
easement may not be irrevocably damaged by construction activities. If irrevocable damage
is caused, the applicant shall be responsible for replacement plantings at a rate of 2:1
diameter inches.
11. Applicant shall report tree removal quantities to the city.
12. Upon completion of the installation of initial erosion control measures, the contractor shall
contact the city’s Engineering Department (Ryan Pinkalla, 952-227-1173) for an initial
erosion control inspection prior to grading operations.
13. HDPE pipe installed shall be furnished with tracer wire meeting the City of Chanhassen’s
Standard Specifications.
14. The applicant shall submit hydraulic design calculations and follow-up analysis for the newly
proposed stormwater conveyance system, including analysis for riprap stilling basins and
rock check dams as energy dissipaters.
15. One hundred percent (100%) construction plans shall be provided for review and approval
prior to commencement of any construction activities.
16. The applicant shall enter into maintenance agreements with the city and/or Lower Minnesota
River Watershed District to ensure maintenance responsibilities and ownership are the
Planning Commission Summary – January 21. 2020
3
responsibility of the HCRRA or their designee, in perpetuity, prior to commencement of any
construction activities.
17. The applicant shall provide further justification to the wetlands being impacted being
incidental. This can be accomplished through the WCA permit process that is currently
underway.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Skistad noted the verbatim and summary
Minutes of the Planning Commission dated December 3, 2019 as presented.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE. Kate Aanenson provided updates on action taken by
the City Council at their December 9, 2019 and January 13, 2020 meetings and reviewed the
schedule for upcoming meetings.
LOT COVER OVERVIEW. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item.
2019 YEAR IN REVIEW AND 2020 WORK PLAN. Bob Generous reviewed items worked
on by the planning department in 2019 and items included in the 2020 work plan.
Skistad moved, Tietz seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion
carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was
adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Submitted by Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 21, 2020
Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Randall, John Tietz, Michael McGonagill, Doug
Reeder, and Laura Skistad
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad
STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior
Planner; MacKenzie Walters, Associate Planner; and Erick Henricksen, Project Engineer
PUBLIC PRESENT:
Jessica Galatz HCRRA
PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR AN INTERIM USE PERMIT (IUP) AND WETLAND
ALTERATION PERMIT (WAP) FOR THE PURPOSE OF REPAIRING LANDSLIDES
ALONG A PORTION OF THE MINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAIL.
Weick: I will turn it over to Mr. Generous.
Generous: And I’ll turn it over to Erick.
Henricksen: So the applicant here is going to be proposing, or it’s what we’re reviewing here is
an interim use permit, essentially a grading permit. Anything over 1,000 cubic yards of grading
or disturbance requires an IUP for grading. The applicant here, and this kind of gives you a brief
overview of what the proposed repairs are going to be or what the work is going to be for the
area but I’d like to start kind of from the beginning as all things do. The impetus of why this IUP
or grading permit came in. Back in 2014 the metro area experienced some real intense rain
events. I don’t know if everyone remembers but in June 19, 2014 was a very intense rain event
as you can see from some of the precip data that’s given. This event caused flash flood watches
and warnings around the metro area. Eden Prairie, our neighbor there to the east experienced
precip’s in a one day of about 5 ½ inches which is fairly intense. And then also there were rain
events prior to this June 19th event which saturated soils and caused more washout of roads and
other kind of, oh sorry about that. Similar damage to areas or damage to the metro area. The
Minnesota Bluffs LRT regional trail did experience damage as seen from some of these images.
The images on your left here, right here is a drone shot of the south, what we’ll be calling the
south repair area. So here’s a landslide. This was taken shortly thereafter the landslide. You
can see a tree has fallen and what not. This landslide also caused some damage to the culvert
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
2
that’s located just on the downslope of this landslide here and that conveys stormwater
underneath the trail. You can see the concrete headwall is damaged. This photo here was taken
in 2019 and then here’s just a photo of the trail that was closed. The Three Rivers Park District
closed the trail after this event in 2014. Blocked it off with just some black metal fence. In 2015
there was some repairs, some immediate repairs done to the toe of the slope with the installation
of riprap and the applicant or the Hennepin County Railroad Authority secured some FEMA
funds for that. This can be considered phase 1. Phase 2 was kind of a larger scope. A larger
repair of the areas and that’s basically where we’re at today with our IUP application. Just to
give you a better understanding of the project area, we’re located, this failure happened on the
trail in the south end of, or the south side of Chanhassen. The LRT regional trail bisects
Chanhassen as seen here with the red line. Connects Eden Prairie to Chaska. It’s basically a
bicycle highway. It’s a main route in the area which has been out of commission due to these
failures. The applicant has proposed two access routes to these construction areas or the grading
areas. One would be from Eden Prairie. Accessing the trail Eden Prairie about right here I
believe it’s called Highview Court or Highview Road. Access via the trail to the north repair
area and then they’re also proposing coordination with Moon Valley Aggregate and the property
owner there to access the south repair area. Due to, while these project areas aren’t immediately
adjacent to homes they are located and the trail is located kind of sandwiched between some
residential development so normal construction hours, which for the city is 7:00 to 6:00 Monday
through Friday are going to be adhered to. Also within the area and near the construction limits
is a city conservation easement that’s attached to Settler’s West. We have reviewed the plans.
They are proposing to delineate that and not cause any disturbance in that area. Get a little more
familiar with the construction plans. It’s kind of a busy page here but one of the things to note is
a grading permit. The dark black lines are the proposed grades or those are areas where you’re
going to be seeing grading occurring. So the repair area you can see is kind of a little bit larger
compared to the north repair area. Looking at the north repair area, brief overview would be
they’re going to, well here let me point out this area here was one of the landslides or slope
failures and this area here was that one photo we saw previously of the landslide. Down at the
bottom is the culvert that was damaged but in general you can see kind of with these black lines
where the grading will occur. The applicant’s proposing approximately 25,000 cubic yards of
grading so there’s a lot of work to be done in this area but the grading would be mainly across
the trail here. We can see the slope repair area. There’s some grading here and then the creation
of a ditch or a drainage channel and some minor grading over here. To look more closely at the
repair areas, so this here in your upper left corner is a plan view of the north repair area and
below that is a profile view. The plan here is to repair the north landslide with some riprap. Fill
it in as you can see again on the profile and then re-establish grades here. They’re proposing a 1
½ to 1 grade. They will be capping so here is a stormwater conveyance pipe that travels under
the trail at this north repair area. They’ll be capping and filling this and abandoning this
stormwater pipe with the intent of, if we then look to the right here horizontally drilling a new
stormwater conveyance pipe to then enter into a drainage channel with check dams and then it
would enter into the south repair area. Essentially if I back up a slide. The stormwater would
come from Settler’s West, under the trail and then be routed essentially to this culvert area. So
what they’re doing is going to just be re-routing that drainage south here. One of the things that
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
3
we’ve conditioned on this permit is to see some photo analysis on the drainage channel,
especially as it comes to hydraulic calculations and looking at the sizing of their energy
dissipation devices so at the drainage channel they’re going to be using rock check dams which
have been proposed to be evenly spaced at about every 50 feet. There is a slope within this area
that gets a little steep and we just want to ensure that the repair methodology that they’re using
once installed doesn’t necessarily degrade or cause further erosion or any other kind of
environmental impacts of that sort so that’s one of the conditions there. Also when they do the
directional drilling here they will be putting a tracer wire on it per city specifications so that way
in the future we can locate that if necessary. Or the applicant or the owner of this system can.
Looking more at the south repair area where I would say a majority of the grading will be
occurring, the intent here is to stabilize this slope. In order to do that what they’re going to be,
what they’ve proposed is to lower the grade of the trail approximately 10 feet and some locations
10 to 12 feet. Maintaining a 5 percent slope so again up here is the plan view and then below
that is the profile view to kind of give you a perspective of how far they’re going to be dropping
the trail. This is one of the reasons is to draw the slope here to a 2 to 1 so something a little more
gradual in order to maintain slope stability. To our right here you can see cross sections of the
trail kind of right above Station 600 and 650 so kind of right above where they’re doing most of
the cutting. So you can see there’s going to be quite a bit of removal and then the slope will be
stabilized with some reinforced matting. And then here’s just kind of another view to show the
extent of lowering the trail. Grading out the steep slopes and getting that kind of 2 to 1 max all
the way down to again this existing culvert. Additional improvements that they’re proposing is
to remove the damaged concrete headwall to this culvert and install the flared end section. Do
some riparian restoration to the stream here. They’re going to be installing some of these rock
veins or essentially check dams for anticipation and then they’ll also have a stilling basin here to
accomplish kind of the same task there. Essentially that’s an overview of the project. Kind of
how we, or how they came to this point through the storm events and the kind of looking at the
overall plan of attack to do the repairs and open the trail back up.
Generous: Well the staff is recommending approval of the interim use permit to permit the
grading and excavation of this site to repair the sloughing, subject to the conditions in our staff
report and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
Aanenson: Bob were you going to go through any of the findings or the conditions of the
grading permit at all or just?
Generous: Well they, the main thing is that all the improvements they’re doing are to improve
the condition of the site. We’re trying to re-open the trail facility and to do that they have to
clean up this area so.
Henricksen: I think one of the conditions that kind of diverge from your typical IUP or grading
permit is the applicant will have to enter into a maintenance, operation and maintenance kind of
agreement with either the city or the watershed district. These aren’t city owned utilities or
infrastructure or anything of that matter. We’re only issuing a grading permit to get the
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
4
restoration completed. There is concern that in the future if there’s any, you know with any kind
of storm utility for instance that horizontally drilled pipe or when you’re looking at installing
improvements to a drainage channel with basins and check dams you know those kind of things
do have to be maintained so one of the conditions that are within this permit and the findings
here would be to have that executed agreement with the applicant and either again the watershed
district or the City for a clear understanding on who’s going to be maintaining operating those
improvements. Most of the other conditions I think are pretty straight forward when it comes to
grading, the time of operations, the haul routes. There is some encroachment if you see here on
the construction limits on the south repair area where they’re going to be going into the Moon
Valley Aggregate site so temporary construction easements of that sort would have to be
executed and provided to the City prior to any kind of issuance or notice to proceed on this
operation. Are there any others that stand out?
Generous: No and again it’s the slope restoration will create stormwater improvements that
should improve the conditions that are out there right now. It’s a net benefit for the community
to have this.
Aanenson: I guess what I was looking for was what Erick had just answered just for your
edification so as part of the grading permit they manage the traffic, the hauling routes. Those are
all part of the permit that would be administered too.
Henricksen: Yep and that initial erosion control inspection would be called into the City to
review typical to again any grading operation of this size erosion control measures have to be
installed. Your typical BMP’s. From review of the plans they meet our standards and as always
adaptive management moving forward on, if more measures are needed you know it’s something
that we continue to review and inspect as it is in the city of Chanhassen.
Weick: Great, thank you. Questions for the City at this time on what you just heard?
Reeder: Mr. Chairman.
Weick: Yes.
Reeder: I think you heard you say that the trail will go down by 10 feet. What does that do for
the people that are trying to use the trail? What kind of slope are we going to have?
Henricksen: They’re proposing a 5 percent slope over the lowered section so that’s consistent
with ADA requirements. When you’re looking at regional trails I believe 5 percent. I believe
you might even be able to go up to about 8.33 percent over a certain amount of distance but as
proposed it’s within your requirements for ADA so.
Reeder: Okay.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
5
Henricksen: If you looking at this profile you kind of see it and you’re like well that looks pretty
steep. It’s just because of the horizontal scale that’s given to this so this is over I believe 700
feet. 800 feet that this lowering is occurring. Actually I correct myself. I believe it’s 1,200 feet
so it’s over quite a long distance that.
Reeder: That’s what I couldn’t figure out from this. Okay.
McGonagill: Erick on the, so the owner will be the regional trail authority at the end of the day
when you talk about maintaining this if I’m looking to who is listed as the applicant, who will be
the owner?
Henricksen: The applicant for this IUP is the Hennepin County Railroad Authority. After
conversation with the applicant I believe the intent is to transfer ownership of these
improvements to Carver County, although I would defer that kind of to their, what they are
looking for. In regards to meeting that requirement on the permit on who to enter into that
agreement at this time it would be the Hennepin County Railroad Authority. Any transfer of that
ownership and maintenance would then have to follow up with an update to that maintenance
agreement entered into with the City or the watershed district.
McGonagill: Okay. One more question. You’ve done a lot of work to take care of what I’d call
surface issues. You did a lot of surface grading’s. Surface lowering. And that’s reflecting the
surface conditions. What do you know about the sub-surface conditions? Have any soil borings
been taken along this to know you know is this just a fluff sitting on top of clay that when it gets
saturated it’s going to move again? You know you’re not going to be able to hold it. You know
what can you tell me if anything about that along that profile, what are we looking at? Is it kind
of like, to use a paraphrase is it an avalanche that’s just going to happen someday? Continue to
go on from that.
Henricksen: The applicant along with their engineer, Barr Engineering conducted over the
course of I believe 3 or 4 years subsequent borings to kind of do this analysis. They did a slope
stability assessment and kind of went through all the different alternatives to kind of land on this
one. I think that also was coordination with FEMA in regards to scope of work and the funding
so they have quite a few borings that were provided to the City. The City after review of kind of
their approach and looking at the sub-soils you know find that as far as soils, or slope
stabilization to meet your standards and what’s expected when you’re doing this type of work.
Our major concern would be the new drainage channel that’s being constructed and the stability
of that with an energy dissipation devices and kind of looking at a 10 year event or some event
that to ensure that that’s installed and corrected. Some of our review regarding the toe of the
slope is recommendations from our report but I know the applicant is kind of confined to what
FEMA and their engineers did on their review and then what Barr Engineering did on their
review as well. One of the other things that was found I believe in one of the soil borings I think
in 2015 or 16 was that there were some contaminated soils that were found. This is kind of one
of those rails to trails trail so it was a railroad at one time so it’s fairly typical to find the type of
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
6
contamination that they did. They quantified that at about I want to say 2,500 cubic yards which
they’re going to haul off site and dispose of at a landfill but I mean borings and a slope stability
analysis was provided.
McGonagill: So when they did that slope stability, I mean if you can just kind of summarize it?
Is it fairly pinned in? Is it, is it fragile? I’m trying to think of the right words because when I
worked this in other areas and you kind of look at it and it says well if they have a really good
saturated it’s going to move you know or it’s not. You know that’s kind of where, that’s where
my question’s going.
Henricksen: Right we, our department after review of their study and their conclusions we found
were reasonable. To get into the I think the nitty gritty of you know they show you their mora
circles and their cohesions and all of that but to get into the nitty gritty of that I would probably
defer that to their engineer as well.
McGonagill: Okay thank you Erick.
Weick: Any thoughts down there on the end Commissioner Tietz. Looks like you might be
brewing something.
Tietz: Just scrolling through…
Weick: Alright. Fair enough. I just have one super minor clarification but on page 5 when
we’re talking about tree height, it’s noted as 6 inches and larger. Should that be 6 feet?
Henricksen: So that’s, DBH is the diameter at breast height so that’s, you’re looking at a 6 inch
diameter tree.
Weick: Diameter, got it.
Henricksen: And it’s a certain distance from the ground and that defines it.
Weick: I was confused on that, thank you very much. Other silly questions from the
commission. Better questions would be even better. Alright with that then thank you Erick and
Bob. Would invite the applicant to come forward and tell us about the project.
Jessica Galatz: Thank you Chair and commission. My name is Jessica Galatz. I work with
Hennepin County, specifically the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority and I’d like to
introduce Brent Turro with Barr Engineering is the project engineer on this.
Brent Turro: Project Manager.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
7
Jessica Galatz: Project Manager from our engineering consultant. I’m happy to answer any
questions. I think Erick and Bob did a great job explaining this project. As you all know, I don’t
know if any of you are avid trail users but this trail has been closed since 2014. It’s been quite a
rollercoaster ride trying to get it repaired. We worked with FEMA for several years and then one
of the questions from Commissioner McGonagill was who is going to own this property. A
couple years ago we identified a funding program through Met Council and we can sell this
segment of the corridor to Carver County so we’ll sell the corridor to Carver County and then
those proceeds will be used for the project repair. So ultimately.
McGonagill: …Carver County.
Jessica Galatz: Yep everything from the county line to the end of our current ownership in
Chaska. So it’s about 3 miles
McGonagill: Oh okay. So it’s a good section. They’re not just buying this. They’re buying a
lot of it.
Jessica Galatz: Yep and I’ll be honest this has kind of been our goal for a while. I think when
we bought this corridor Carver County didn’t have a regional railroad authority or didn’t have,
wasn’t in place long enough to take on this ownership so we bought the 13 mile long corridor in
one piece in 1990 and now we’re trying to convey it to the county that it’s housed in. So they’ll
be the ultimate owner. We are working with them and the watershed district right now on that
maintenance agreement so we’re all in the know about what the expectations are in the future to
maintain that new drainage channel. I don’t know if anyone else has any questions we could
answer.
McGonagill: Well let’s go back to my question on the slope stability. You know with Barr. It’s
more looks like the subsurface geotechnical that you’re dealing with.
Brent Turro: So you want me to just give you an overview of what we found?
McGonagill: Yeah.
Brent Turro: So in general the embankment is a sandy clay soil. It’s a mix of maybe natural
clay soils or soils that were cut as the rail corridor was built and then used as embankment fill,
particularly in this stretch. Below that is some siltier surface soils but then as you get down into
it it’s mostly sand. So slope stability we assess through looking at different alternatives. One
alternative was to keep the trail grade where it is and move the embankment slopes out required
a lot of fill. It’s ultimately more expensive as well. This concept would require, I shouldn’t say
require. This concept would be to take the trail grade down further and then reduce the slopes.
That improves the slope stability so we did the analysis where we targeted standard factors of
safety for trail embankments along transportation or other infrastructure corridors and our
analysis satisfies those factors of safety. And that’s really the gist of it.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
8
McGonagill: Okay. I notice they’re using flexi mat. Is that what you’re putting in the drainage
channel?
Brent Turro: Correct.
McGonagill: Yeah I’ve just used that in a previous life. It will stay. It’s a good product. It
doesn’t move.
Brent Turro: Okay, good to hear.
McGonagill: Once you get some growth around it you’re pretty well, you’ll pin it in.
Brent Turro: Okay, yeah good to hear. We considered that and upon recommendation from the
County here they had used on previous projects so.
McGonagill: Yeah I’ve used it on some really bad soils and just give it a couple, you know over
seed it a lot and give it a couple years and you’ll be good.
Brent Turro: Well that’s good to hear.
Weick: We’ll have to leave that note for Carver County.
McGonagill: There you go.
Weick: Is the trail fenced at all in that area to keep people on the trail?
Jessica Galatz: Yes I believe when the trail was built it had a fence running along both sides
because both sides of the trail are pretty steep in that area.
Weick: Okay.
Jessica Galatz: And those are still in place although at the specific location of the south failure
not all the posts are still in place.
Weick: Okay.
Jessica Galatz: And then we’ve added fencing at both ends of where we’ve closed the trail to
fence it off from public use.
Weick: Right. So that fence will be repaired then and reinstated.
Jessica Galatz: Certainly, yep.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
9
Weick: Okay.
Jessica Galatz: So there will be some repair to the trail as part of this project. There was damage
to the trail in the 2014 storm event and then just over the last almost 6 years of not getting in
there to maintain the trail regularly nature has kind of taken back so that will be included in the
project.
Weick: Okay. Good down there? Questions. Okay well thank you very much and thank you
for helping us understand the project a little more.
Jessica Galatz: Okay.
Weick: With that I will open the public hearing portion of tonight’s event. Anyone wishing to
come forward please do so at this time. And seeing nobody come forward I will close the public
hearing and open the item for Commissioner discussion. Seems to me you know hallelujah, this
is one of those where.
Randall: It’s very well planned out.
Weick: Yeah.
Randall: It’s obviously engineered well and they know what they need to do so.
Weick: Yeah it will be nice to have this open.
Tietz: Having biked that for many years I’m looking to it getting back into shape. It was such a
beautiful trail down to Chaska and some of those overlooks were spectacular down at the bottom
so it will be good to get it back.
Weick: I certainly would entertain a motion if there was no further discussion on the item.
Tietz: I’ll make a motion.
Weick: Thank you.
Tietz: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the Interim
Use Permit Planning Case 2020-01 to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as
proposed in the plans prepared by Barr Engineering Company dated 12-13-2019 subject to the
conditions of approval an adopt the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
Weick: Thank you Commissioner Tietz. We have a valid motion. Do we have a second?
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
10
McGonagill: I’ll second it.
Weick: We have a second from Commissioner McGonagill. Any interim discussion before we
vote? Seeing and hearing none.
Tietz moved, McGonagill seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission
recommends the City Council approve the Interim Use Permit, Planning Case 2020-01 to
permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as proposed on the plans prepared by
Barr Engineering Co., dated 12/13/2019, subject to the Conditions of Approval and
adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
1. The interim use permit shall be approved for a period of two (2) years from the date of City
Council approval. The applicant will need to request a formal extension 60 days prior to the
expiration date of the interim use permit.
2. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agency must be obtained; including but not limited
to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and
Carver County.
3. The applicant must provide the city with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of
110% of the construction costs for the appropriate phase of the grading operations to
guarantee erosion control measures, site restoration, and compliance with the interim use
permit.
4. Documentation and/or load tickets from the approved waste disposal facility where
contaminated soils will be disposed of shall be provided to the city.
5. All required ROW permits, access agreements, and temporary construction easements shall
be secured prior to the commencement of any construction activities.
6. All oversize/overweight loads leaving the site to the east must apply for County
Transportation OS/OW trip permits.
7. Permitted hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday with no work permitted on Sunday or legal holidays.
8. If any excess material is hauled to another site in Chanhassen, a separate grading permit will
be required for the other property.
9. The applicant shall schedule a walk-through of the site with city staff to review boundary
staking and removals of edge trees prior to any activity commencing.
10. The applicant shall identify conservation easement boundary on site. Vegetation within the
easement may not be irrevocably damaged by construction activities. If irrevocable damage
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
11
is caused, the applicant shall be responsible for replacement plantings at a rate of 2:1
diameter inches.
11. Applicant shall report tree removal quantities to the city.
12. Upon completion of the installation of initial erosion control measures, the contractor shall
contact the city’s Engineering Department (Ryan Pinkalla, 952-227-1173) for an initial
erosion control inspection prior to grading operations.
13. HDPE pipe installed shall be furnished with tracer wire meeting the City of Chanhassen’s
Standard Specifications.
14. The applicant shall submit hydraulic design calculations and follow-up analysis for the newly
proposed stormwater conveyance system, including analysis for riprap stilling basins and
rock check dams as energy dissipaters.
15. One hundred percent (100%) construction plans shall be provided for review and approval
prior to commencement of any construction activities.
16. The applicant shall enter into maintenance agreements with the city and/or Lower Minnesota
River Watershed District to ensure maintenance responsibilities and ownership are the
responsibility of the HCRRA or their designee, in perpetuity, prior to commencement of any
construction activities.
17. The applicant shall provide further justification to the wetlands being impacted being
incidental. This can be accomplished through the WCA permit process that is currently
underway.
All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0.
Weick: The motion passes unanimously 6 to 0.
McGonagill: Get her done.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Skistad noted the verbatim and summary
Minutes of the Planning Commission dated December 3, 2019 as presented.
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION UPDATE.
Aanenson: Thank you. Since we haven’t met since the last meeting was December 9th. The last
time the City Council met of last year so I’ll kind of give you an update on that. The City
Council did grant Avienda an extension of their grading plat permit. We do have a meeting set
up here in the next week to meet with them and see where they’re at and get things rolling. I
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
12
know Erick Henricksen’s been working hard on their grading permit so kind of see where we’re
at with that whole status so the goal was, previously was you know we extinguished the plat with
the City Council. Just granted them preliminary plat and they were grading under the
preliminary plat with securities in place so it’s still our intention now, then come back through
the process and amending the PUD as I mentioned before. They moved some things internally
around so hopefully they’ve indicated, so they got a 6 month extension so we’re hoping that the
grading permit can be worked on here pretty quickly. The amendments to the city code that you
looked at last year were approved and then also the adopted the new development fees. That’s
always done at the last meeting of the year. So then on Monday the 15th the Bluff Creek Partners
came. I know I was asked by somebody about this project. So that’s a piece of property that’s
across from the Church of the Living, is that the name of the church? Bluff Creek Partners and
it’s kind of the town, office townhouse project right there on Highway 5. And they want to do
multi-family. They presented that to the City Council. 30 units an acre so we’ll be giving some
recommendations that maybe just come through on concept. We don’t have that high of a
zoning district except in the regional commercial and the Avienda project. Those are also kind
of central specific attributes of those district so they’d have to amend the PUD because that’s an
existing PUD. It’s an industrial park so they’d have to change the land use so kind of
sequentially what I suggested to them is if they just want to come through concept and see before
they, because the concept does as you know under the PUD show plans and you’d have to do a
lot of civil engineering so we take that approach and then by then because we make any
amendments to our comp plan until it gets approved which we’re anticipating the approving that
tomorrow night and then going to the first meeting in February and we’ll show with you some of
those, the minor tweaks that were made too so that was the discussion last Monday night so
that’s kind, I have given them some, kind of a course or a path to follow so we’ll see what their
response is with that.
McGonagill: Do you think that would show up on our plates here?
Aanenson: I’m not sure what they’re going to do. If it came through a concept yes. Then we
hold a public hearing on the concept.
McGonagill: But when do you think in the summer?
Aanenson: I think they were interested in doing it rather quickly so yeah. So the concept would
happen quickly. Then we have to do all the civil engineering and the detail work. It would
probably be much later, yes.
McGonagill: Okay.
Aanenson: We’re in, it’s complicated because they’re next to a tributary so you’re in the
shoreland district. There’s height requirements. There’s just a lot, there’s soil type issues there
so just a lot of complications on that one too so I’m trying to navigate all that so we’ll see. We’ll
see what path they choose there. And then they also out there they also approved what you
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
13
looked at the Minnewashta Parkway. That’s the Boylan Shores, that subdivision was also
approved so that was next so we had those two, I think you had a little bit of angst about the non-
street connection there so that one’s going forward so that’s it. I think if it’s okay I’ll just take a
couple minutes and some things that are coming up. So our next meeting which would be the
first one in February, we have on that schedule the Moments Senior Housing and that one also is
kind of in the shoreland district so it’s incumbent with a lot of things there regarding wetlands.
So it’s just south or to the, well it’s straight across from Audubon Road next to Lake Ann Park. I
think we talked about that one so it’s like approximately 40 units of senior. So it’s a great
project. It’s nice architecture. It’s just trying to get the feet on the right so we’ll have some
recommendations so that should be on your next meeting. And then also Commissioner
McGonagill we talked about, he gave a good suggestion where we have some gaps. I think the
last year we were so busy with comp plan we didn’t put other projects on there but we’ll be
sharing with you some projects the engineering so George will be sharing with you the Lyman
Boulevard crossing. What they’re going to be doing. The new construction of Lyman
Boulevard going out to Chaska. There’ll be a couple roundabouts there so be sharing that with
you and then also there’s a ped crossing, some flashing lights going on at Lake Lucy so he’ll
explain both those projects to you too. So then we do anticipate maybe one or two things
coming in. Chapel Hill coming in for a variance on their electronic message center. We’re
waiting to see if…ready to come in on that meeting or not because we have a gap then on March
3rd because March 3rd is the.
Walters: State primaries.
Aanenson: State primaries. I want to say caucus. The State primary so we not have a meeting
that night on March 3rd so we’re trying to get some projects either side of that and somewhere in
there you might see the concept PUD. You might see Avienda coming back but somewhere in
there we’ll see where those land. There’s a couple other things that are floating out there but
none of those are you know, come to fruition yet. We’ve got a couple meetings set up. We’ll see
if some of these other projects take off but as far as what’s public right now that’s what we
know. So yes.
Tietz: It’s kind of interesting when you talk about timing and timing for Avienda.
Aanenson: Yeah.
Tietz: And how long that’s been in the process because you know at one time the Vikings were
considering that site and they were considering the site in Eagan and if you see what’s been
happening in Eagan compared to Avienda, somebody’s moving quite quickly.
Aanenson: Yes.
Tietz: In Eagan.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
14
Aanenson: Yes I get emails all the time. I got one yesterday from someone and I unfortunately
can’t control all that but yes.
Tietz: Yeah.
Aanenson: So it’d be nice to get that going which made me think of something else. I know
Commissioner Reeder’s given me a couple dates that he’s going to be gone. I know people do
spring traveling and so I just if you’re going to be gone if you give us a heads up on that. I know
he said he’d be gone February 4th through March 3rd. You’d be missing that one and we don’t
have a meeting March 3rd so, so if anybody knows of those if you want to just email me ahead of
time so I’d rather do that than frantically call the night of the meeting so that would be great. So
that’s all I have for upcoming meetings.
Weick: Okay.
LOT COVER OVERVIEW.
Weick: Are we covering the lot.
Aanenson: Yeah. MacKenzie’s going to…because that was suggested. That’s kind of our
looking at long term projects and just informational questions so that was brought up by
Commissioner Skistad so we thought we’d just kind of give an overview on that.
Weick: Okay.
Walters: Yep so.
Weick: We’re still on the clock right? This is not a.
Aanenson: Well it’s supposed to be work session. Somehow it didn’t get on the agenda
correctly so.
Weick: We’ll just leave it open?
Aanenson: Yeah.
Weick: Okay.
Walters: So how I’d like to handle this is I’ve put together a very, very brief power point just
kind of highlighting four of the key ideas in the briefing I wrote up and included in your agenda.
I’ll kind of blaze through them and then I’d be happy to ask any questions you have. Answer
any questions you have or go into as much or as little depth as you want. If you felt the report
covered everything well and don’t have any questions that’s okay too. I won’t be hurt so first off
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
15
I just wanted to frame what the City considers lot cover. Basically how I always explain it to
citizens on the phone is lot cover is anything that’s going to stop water from hitting the ground
and then I go into the two exemptions I mentioned which is that decks with gaps that are over the
top of grass or soils or landscaping is exempted from lot cover calculations as is the water
portion of swimming pools. But within lot cover we then have, I saw a look there. The reason
why we exempt the water portion of swimming pools is because they’re typically filled with
about a 6 inch excess storage capacity and in theory that allows any water that’s hitting the pool
to be stored instead of running off onto the property. I realize that that theory is sometimes
challenged by the existence of pool covers but that’s been the City’s policy.
Weick: Well explained, thank you.
Walters: Thank you. Within lot cover we break it up into two broad categories. Impervious
surfaces and pervious pavements and we’ll talk a little bit more about pervious pavements later
on in this but impervious surfaces are your asphalts, your concrete, your roofs, the things that
absolutely prevent the water from getting down to the soil. So the next question was how much
lot cover is allowed. We basically use lot cover to help provide an expectation for how intensely
a piece of land can be developed and the table to the side here gives a range of what our different
land use categories will allow in terms of the amount of acreage that can be covered by structures
and improvements of that nature and you’ll see it, you know the residential it varies from 20
percent in our large lot districts with a lot clustering kind of that 25 to 50 percent range and then
we allow much higher intensity of use with office industrial and commercial. That’s partially
due to just the realities of the size of those buildings and the parking facilities they need as well
as the fact that those type of users tend to have the finances and technical expertise to do stuff
like underground storage systems. You know dedicate portions for stormwater ponds and have
infrastructure like that that can absorb stormwater runoff and control rate and flow to city
standards whereas your typical residential homeowner is not going to have that ability or
capacity, nor necessarily want those features on their yard. One thing I will note is we have two
kind of…districts. The Business Fringe. That’s the unsewered area at the bottom of the Y is
limited to 40 percent lot cover and that’s to reflect the fact that it does not have the same type of
infrastructure as the part of the city that is developed. And then the Central Business District has
no lot cover limit and that is it’s intention to be denser, more urban development pattern within
the city. I promised a little bit more on pervious pavers so in 2000 and oh boy was it, it was the
beginning of 2018 I think when we got, finally finished our research and passed the pervious
paver ordinance and what the City had decided was properties zoned residential single family,
those are the ones in yellow on this map, located out of the shoreland district. So that’s 1,000
feet from any lake or 300 feet from any stream would be allowed to have basically an extra 5
percent lot cover as long as they used an engineered paver system that met city standards. So
that’s what we got into a little bit when we amended that to defer to the Interlocking Concrete
Paver Institute’s design standards instead of city design plate a couple weeks ago. That kind of
spurred this conversation. So essentially the City said if you design a system that can
demonstrate to us it will allow for the infiltration of stormwater and you’re not in one of these
ecologically sensitive regions near a lake you could have higher lot coverage in this district. Just
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
16
as note any property in the city can choose to use pervious pavers but it’s only exempted from
the lot cover calculations for the properties in yellow here that are outside of the gray area.
Weick: I just can’t read, what are the yellow? What is the yellow?
Walters: Sorry I went kind of fast on that and used acronyms. That’s the residential single
family district. So that is the largest of our single, detached single family housing districts. So
we have, you know the residential single family is your kind of typical suburban land use pattern.
15,000 square foot lots that a lot of the city was designed around. Those tend to be some of the
older areas in the city that had the most issues with either sub-standard lots or things having been
built up you know over 20 or 30 years of occupancy and new homeowners really struggling to
make improvements on their property. So that was a zoning district that staff identified as being
the most likely to be able to benefit from having the increased lot cover. This is also the district
that anecdotally we had noticed the most variance requests coming in from.
Weick: So if it’s not yellow on this map it is not a residential single family zoned area?
Walters: Correct. Now that doesn’t mean it’s not detached single family. For instance we have
the residential low and medium district which is Fox Woods is an example of that. We also have
residential PUD’s like The Park. One of the reasons why we didn’t extend this to those districts
is the city code allows planned unit developments to go up to 30 percent lot cover anyways so we
felt that by allowing the RSF, the residential single family district that was at 25 percent to go up
to that 30 percent we were evening the playing fields. Also a lot of the planned, please cut me
off if I begin, this is what I do day in and day out so I can really get going.
Skistad: Can you make the map bigger?
Walters: You know I’m sorry. I should have thought to just put it on one slide so it’d be a lot
more visible. I can email you all a full sized copy of the map if you’d like after this just so you
have it for your reference. But what I was saying is the other thing you’ll see with PUD’s, I
attached a breakdown of the lot cover allowed in every PUD-R. So PUD residential in the city to
the staff report I gave you and you’ll notice a lot of them say 30 percent spread out over district.
So what we did there is we’d allow them to take, similar to what The Park did, you know a
section of upland that they are preserving. Take the lot cover that ordinarily could have gone
there and spread it out over the other houses and we usually cap that and have a hard limit built
into the PUD so we know they’re not going over that 30 percent. But again because that had
been finely calculated and because in those areas the stormwater infrastructure was designed to
deal with that we didn’t feel comfortable messing with that on a global blanket and felt if there
were rare cases where exemptions were needed the variance process would be more appropriate.
RLM district is a similar mindset with a base 35 percent lot cover allowed but in exchange they
have to dedicate significant amounts of upland to be preserved and we kind of reallocate that to
make up for the increased lot cover elsewhere.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
17
Aanenson: I just want to add to that. So if you look at the zoning district that’s the most fluid it
would be residential single family. Most people that move into a townhouse or a PUD that’s
besides the RLM where they may want to add a three season porch, those are the people that are
usually adding on. Adding additional garage space. Adding on another bedroom so those are
really when looking at the whole process of where the most flexibility should be is over there
because people have kind of bought into these existing neighborhoods as MacKenzie said that
have already got the double dip. You know they’ve already got the benefit of a smaller lot.
More hard cover with the benefit of some open space attached to it so that was kind of the mad
science if I may be.
Weick: Perfect thanks.
Walters: So with that I’ll go onto just the last one. So one of the things that you know brought
up the entire discussion with the Planning Commission and City Council over the last couple
years of looking into pervious pavers was the realization that one of the more common variances
requests we receive is for increased lot cover. So when we get these in making our staff
recommendation I just quick broke down what staff zeros in on when we try to determine
whether or not you know we think it’s in line with the criteria required to find in favor of
granting a variance. We do really look at the surrounding area stormwater infrastructure and try
to determine you know if this is an area that’s going to be really sensitive to increased lot cover.
If there’s a history of flooding and stormwater management and we do factor that into our
recommendation if we know there are major ongoing issues. Also the weird balance act of how
much lot cover is being proposed and that’s both in terms of absolute and relative terms. So if
you remember we had a variance a while back where an individual was asking for, I believe it
worked out to about an 8 percent lot cover variance which in relative terms if quite a bit but
because the parcel was so very small it really only worked out to about 500 square feet and so we
do weigh both those factors. The relative in terms of trying to make sure like properties are
treated like and looking at overall neighborhood context and aesthetics as well as how much
Impact will this have on the environment. You know in theory a 5 acre parcel could request a
half percent lot cover variance that would have a much greater impact in terms of impervious
surface generated because the absolute number would be very large even though percentage wise
it’d be a 20.5 percent variance or whatever it may be. We also always try to find ways for the
homeowner to mitigate the impact of the increased lot cover be it through the use of rain gardens,
rain barrels or pervious pavements and you’ll see that in a lot of conditions. I also should have
put buffers in there because I know we’ve started requiring those within the shoreland. So you
know kind of a take home is we do realize that no one lot cover variance is likely to break a
neighborhood stormwater infrastructure but we do try to mindful of the cumulative impact within
a neighborhood and balancing the overall impact of these small decisions and how they can add
up. So just thought it might be helpful to give you a little insight into our thought process as we
write our reports. That being said I can talk about this at quite some length so let me know.
McGonagill: Well first thanks for putting this together.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
18
Walters: My pleasure.
McGonagill: It’s good to have.
Weick: Perfect.
Skistad: How do they decide overall what their requirements are for based on different
properties? Is that just an arbitrary state number?
Walters: No. It gets complicated and those numbers have changed over time. I know you’ve
been interested in that and I tried to do some research. I tracked it back to I believe it was
1977ish DNR guidelines. I might be wrong on the year but it was mid 70’s and they’d been
advocating for a 30 percent in the shoreland. I again I obviously wasn’t at staff at the time and
not everything’s well documented. A lot of it came down to the City does have a large amount
of aquatic resources and I believe that was used kind of as the benchmark for what a low density
residential should have on the maximum. I will say you know now that additional research has
came out DNR says for impaired waterways anything over 10 percent has markedly negative
impacts but you know obviously it’d be very, very hard for us to now go back and tell a bunch of
people that oh sorry, we know you said you could have 25 percent but you need to cut your
house in half so some of these numbers get sticky. Once you start using the guideline you
initially adopt it creates your neighborhood benchmark and you tend to then work around that for
what’s considered acceptable. It also then becomes what you engineer your systems around. So
you know when whatever planner was sitting there and got that DNR guideline and said okay,
you know 25 to 30 percent is where we want to be. We then began engineering our stormwater
systems to accommodate that so again it’s very difficult to move significantly beyond that
because your systems are not designed to handle higher amounts, if that helped at all.
Skistad: Yeah. It makes sense. But when you say your system, you mean like the actual size of
the pipes running under the streets is that what you’re?
Walters: It’s on the ponding. The stormwater ponds.
Aanenson: So I would say too if you look at the overall percentages, those percentages have
been historically with the city since they created the city code. They haven’t changed much so
again kind of the background for the residential which is the biggest part of the city at the time so
as MacKenzie said you have a lot more, when you do the commercial those are typically now
people can afford, or commercial ones can afford to accommodate it on site. There’s more land.
They’re putting in the parking lots. All kinds of things like that so that’s the difference.
Residential when you’re doing individual lots or the older area that doesn’t have it so this is one
of the things that kind of got us hung up in our comp plan approval. We were doing you know I
and I of, because this is a big issue going on at the City Council right now where we have
penetration when we get super rain events that’s going into our stormwater and then it’s being
treated into the sanitary sewer it’s being treated as sewage so they’re trying to get so that bumps
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
19
up, build a bigger system to manage that so we’re trying to back that out so that’s one of the
things that got us hung up at the Met Council. They wanted more details on how we’re
managing our I and I so they’re all related to each other so what we’re trying to do is hold more
of the water on people’s property which means that you have more green space or you have the
facilities to accommodate it so we’re kind of taking baby steps as MacKenzie said, moving into
the pervious pavers, those sort of things to see if they’re working and so we’re trying to find
other solutions like people doing rain gardens or buffers, things that we know work so there’s
we call hardscape and softscape kind of techniques so those are things that we’re learning as we
go but the number of percentage hasn’t really changed that much.
Skistad: So is our sewage treatment an issue at this point?
Aanenson: No. Well they’re working on it right now. There’s a couple areas that, I wish Erick
was still here. There’s a couple areas that they presented this to, at the work session last Monday
night to the City Council. A specialized study looking at where the problems are like for they’re
going through an relining pipes. The Met Council is. They’re spending some on their pipes too
so if you look at their pipe that runs through the property that’s now in the city, that wetland
they’re fixing that pipe for leaks that’s kind of sitting under water right now. They did the one
over by Audubon all the way out to West 78th. They just lined that one but then we also have to
line some of our pipes every year so part of what they’re looking at is the downtown area. That
there’s a lot of leakage there and they’re wondering that when they do small stuff like if
someone’s putting in a utility for something else, maybe a street light or something like that and
they hit, if they hit some of those or there might be some penetration so that’s what they’re trying
to do is go through those and fix those up so we don’t have, it’s mostly noticeable when there’s a
big rain event then they can spike the monitoring of those sites.
Skistad: Like bumps for E.coli or something?
Aanenson: Correct yeah. No just that there’s more flow going through and because it’s going
into the sanitary sewer as opposed to the storm sewer so those are the things we’re trying to fix.
Separating those two.
Generous: Part of the study is looking at the individual homes contribution to that inflow and
infiltration.
Aanenson: Some of the older homes. Some people hooked their stormwater into the sanitary
sewer.
Walters: Because it then goes away.
Aanenson: Then it goes away and it’s not in your yard and so those are some of the things that
council’s now been looking at. What’s the best way to address this problem and try to, because
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
20
the City it’s part of our tax. You have to pay for that. We get charged for treating it so we’re
just trying to reduce that treatment so.
Weick: And do the homeowners get charged on that volume then?
Aanenson: No. You get a sewer fee on your utility bill.
Weick: Is based with volume?
Generous: No based on the water usage you have.
Weick: Usage but now dumpage.
Generous: ….no.
Weick: Because if it rains more we don’t get charged more.
Generous: No.
Aanenson: No.
Weick: Because there are communities that do that.
Generous: The City gets charged.
Aanenson: The City gets charged for it. We don’t turn around and charge you.
Weick: Okay got it.
Aanenson: But they’re trying to reduce that gap. If it’s a million or two they’re trying to reduce
that gap.
Skistad: I would like to have that just for my own knowledge.
Aanenson: The what?
Skistad: The report that was done just to give me a greater understanding.
Aanenson: Sure.
Generous: Again that leads into what we’re going to talk about for our work program. That
could be a good presentation.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
21
Aanenson: Yeah so George is one that made that to the City Council so he’ll be here next week
so maybe he can add that to his.
Skistad: Okay.
Tietz: MacKenzie, I had a question. On your attachments it’s the permitted lot coverage by
zone district. That green sheet. At least it shows green on mine. Is that what we currently have?
Walters: Yeah, you’re taking about permitted lot coverage by zoning district correct?
Tietz: Right, right.
Walters: Yes, these are the current maximum lot coverage established by the city code for every
zoning district.
Tietz: So do we have a, is there a gap when you look at single, well the two single families. If
it’s 15,000 square feet it’s 30 percent. If it’s 9,000 square feet it’s 35 percent. Is there a gray
area between 9,000 and 15,000 or does that assume that it’s all 35 percent? And we’ve dealt
with this before I know when we look at lots but is that, how should I?
Walters: So it depends on the zoning. So if you’re all, for instance Fox Woods a great example.
Tietz: Yeah.
Walters: Some of the lots are close to that 9,000 square feet. They get 35 percent of 9,000.
Some of Fox Woods lots are in the 15,000 square feet and they get 35 percent of that. Within the
RSF unfortunately we have some legacy properties you know that have 6,000 square feet lots
and they’re then capped to the 30 percent max lot coverage. 25 percent of which impervious so
whatever zone you’re in establishes your percentage cap and your lot area assuming the lot meets
zoning code will be at that minimum but it may be significantly larger.
Tietz: Larger okay.
Walters: Yep.
Aanenson: And just to back up on that too. The only way you can get that zoning is you’re
providing a significant of preservation area so that’s the offset.
Tietz: That’s the offset.
Aanenson: Yeah that’s the offset so again you’re still, as MacKenzie explained it’s still kind of
the same number. It’s just that, and those again tend to be the less flexible lots. People typically
when you buy that kind of lot except for I would say Fox Woods is the anomaly.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
22
Walters: An exception.
Aanenson: But yeah so now they preserved all that woods behind there and that’s what the
offset is.
Tietz: Okay thanks.
Skistad: Okay so that’s like a lot of the areas they have, not only do they have woods but they
also have all the parkland, does that count?
Aanenson: Yeah.
Walters: Exactly. A lot of the PUD’s that was the theory. You know they gave them maybe
10,000 square foot lots with 30 percent lot cover but you had a really nice neighborhood park
and the idea was that was the public green space and that made up for not having as much green
space in your lawn.
Skistad: Okay.
Aanenson: So when we present those projects to you we explain to you what you’re getting and
giving and that’s part of your job is to decide, does that seem to offset. That’s part of your
challenge when you’re having the public hearing, is this the right application on the zoning
district.
Walters: Well thank you very much for your attention.
Weick: That’s all of it?
Aanenson: That’s it.
Walters: I tried to keep it quick.
Weick: Oh okay. I thought there was more on that.
2019 YEAR IN REVIEW AND 2020 WORK PLAN.
Generous: The last thing is our 2019 year in review and 2020 work program.
Weick: Yes.
Generous: And we’re required by city code to present a work program to the City Council for
the upcoming year. We start out by looking at what we did last year and so this is a little
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
23
flashback on what we did but I’d like to start out, this is a census year and so they’re going to
have the census April 1st. They’re going to count everyone in the community. I’ve made my
estimate already and it’s 27,170. So it’s always good because this is one time that I get to check
on it. I actually had a range, it was 26,822 to 27,170 and I took the upper one. But this counts
on the revenue being 95 percent… Fortunately they don’t have as high a person per household.
It’s the single family homes that actually go into that and it’s, it’s based on building permit
activity through this last year, 2019 so. Okay. In 2019 the Planning Commission reviewed 16
planning cases of which there were subdivisions, interim use permits. There was a whole lot of
other things embedded with that so you’d have, if you looked at one of the tables we had, I didn’t
put a good presentation together because most people fall asleep when I put all my spreadsheets
up but I did put the information in there if you’d like so that’s good. The majority of the
applications, all the big projects were really the year before and we were last year doing a lot of
building permit activity. We had Holasek Business Park was approved in 2018 but it was a 2019
project for construction standpoint. Residential development really slowed down this past year.
We had all our building permit activity with the apartments the year before that so those, the
Venue was under construction. Riley Crossing was under construction. We do have one, we’re
working on a couple multi-family projects and you’ll see Moments is the most recent one or the
one that will be the first in line. That’s s 48 room senior project I believe it is. They don’t have
actually dwelling units. It’s a common facility so.
Skistad: Where is that one again?
Generous: That’s on Audubon and West 78th Street.
Skistad: Okay.
Generous: Right on the north side there next to the city park. In 2019 we issued building
permits for 58 dwelling units. Again that’s down. We had projected 200 for the year so we
thought that we might get one, an additional multi-family in there but that didn’t happen which
like I said we were talking to a lot of people and as this year comes up you might see a couple, at
least one more apartment building. Maybe two and again there’s the PUD amendment that
you’ll be looking at that may incorporate what is it, 300 units and 200 units so that would hit my
target in one fell swoop so. So yeah we anticipate about the same number of planning cases for
2020 as we had last year. Again the big one would be Avienda coming back. We believe
they’re going to amend their PUD. And they may do the replat it. I don’t know. They’re
switching a lot of things and Kate’s been working on that with their engineering department so.
For 2020 again most of these, The Park development was approved last year and so they’re
coming in for their second phase of the development. Another 50 units so I think we’re up to
105 units that we’ll have which is very good because that brings us up to a number of the vested
dwelling units that would meet our target if we could have them all built in one year.
Weick: Which one’s The Park?
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
24
Generous: It’s Prince’s old property.
Weick: Oh, The Park.
Generous: The Park I’m sorry.
Weick: I got it. I got it.
Generous: You know we got that great park facility there and they’re working on the parks
commission are working on that an the plans for the development of that.
Skistad: So they sold more of their lots then, is that what you’re saying?
Generous: Yeah they’re platting them. They’re flying out the door. It seems like there’s a big
demand for that development.
Weick: And building right?
Aanenson: Yeah. They have limited, they can’t occupy them. They can just, they can construct
so they’re constructing some of them.
Weick: They should go over to Avienda. They’d move some ground for them.
Generous: Well that’s our hope that Avienda, like I said Avienda’s a big one that should be
going forward and with that we should have, in conjunction with that all the lots that come in
will have to go through the site plan review process though. We anticipate there’ll be residential
be the first components that come in but there may be some commercial development also with
that. The connection to Bluff Creek Boulevard will be a big opening for that part of the
community. It will allow people that are west of that to drive right to the freeway instead of
having to go down to Pioneer all the way around and come back up on Lyman to get there so that
will be a very welcomed thing for the residents down there. And also it will be a nice component
for the community. It provides another opportunity for shopping and place making, a place to go
so. Again the city code, the big code amendments that we’ll come up with in 2020, with our new
water resource person is all the stormwater and local water management ordinances. Any
wetland ordinances. We have to, the watershed districts have been revising their rules and so
we’ll have to make sure that we’re all in conformance with that and so you’ll see, those will be a
lot of the code amendments. MacKenzie has a whole list of amendments that we’ve been
looking at with the code. Small fixes that have to be put into code and clean up’s and so getting
those all done. The big thing as Kate mentioned our comp plan is scheduled for the Met Council
to approve it or find it in conformance with the 2040 plan tomorrow so we went 2 weeks ago we
went to the community development committee. Last week it went to the environmental
committee and tomorrow it goes to the Met Council itself and once they have it, they’ll send out
a notice to us. We’re hoping to bring it to City Council the first meeting in February for
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
25
adoption and put it into effect so. Once we have that in place we send it all back to them in the
final format copy and as part of our work program for 2020 we want to go through, Kate noted
that there were a lot of changes and additions that we made to the comp plan to meet all their
requirements and so we’d like the Planning Commission to be made aware of that.
Aanenson: Let’s rephrase that. There wasn’t a lot of changes. It was how we presented the
data.
Generous: Right.
Aanenson: Yeah so it was, and actually because it took a year and a half we had to modify some
of it but it was just how they wanted it presented which I think was different.
Generous: They requested additional information. Like Kate said the I and I was a big thing that
they kept holding us back on and they wanted to know all the programs in the city did and so we
sent them the reports that we’ve sent them in the past and they said we’ve been spending about
$200,000 a year on I and I.
Skistad: What’s I and I?
Generous: Infill and infiltration into the sanitary sewer system.
Skistad: Okay.
Generous: And so we also said that we were doing a study to look at the residential impacts on
that. How the individual connections to our sewer system were impacting our sanitary sewer
flows. Because the preliminary data that they found was that there are some residential areas
that do, during peak rain events were having higher flows as metered by, in our Met Council
metering system so we’ll look at that and what specifically the City can do and residents can do
to eliminate that or reduce that impact. And again reduce the amount of water we’re sending to
the Blue Lake Treatment Facility.
Aanenson: So I just want to not get too deep in the weeds here so, it has a cumulative effect so
every city’s, they’re not accommodating for all these spike it causes them a problem because
they’re managing that system metro wide. The 7 counties so that’s their objective is to making
sure that they eliminate just like we try to eliminate in a budget where you have spikes and down
turns so they’re trying to kind of even that out and if there’s things that the individual
communities that have more of those problems that they try to reduce those problems so we were
identified as one that should be trying to reduce our’s so there’s a lot of, I think we even had to
do I and I by watershed districts. What did we have to do by watershed districts? There’s just a
lot of minutia detail that really we haven’t had to do before so.
McGonagill: How did you reduce it outside of education?
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
26
Aanenson: Well that’s what was presented to the City Council on Monday night so that’s what I
said again we’ll have George when he’s here he can go through.
McGonagill: Okay.
Aanenson: The council hasn’t decided yet. They just listened to the study. That’s something
that’s on their work plan. One of the initiatives they want to take so…
McGonagill: Alright.
Generous: And as we said, and so finally part of the work program that we’re proposing is to do
that long range planning when we have an opportunity to bring different items back to you.
Demographic and statistic information especially with the census coming out we may get some
preliminary numbers from them yet this year. Sustainable development, next year’s
development. You’ll see that with Avienda with any revisions they make to the PUD. Senior
friendly development items. We may have, we’re leading the pack if you will on that in Carver
County and so we may have some presentations that they can come in and just discuss so that the
Planning Commission is aware of what’s going on and what are the issues that the seniors have
in our community. We will have another joint tour late summer.
Aanenson: Back by popular demand.
Generous: So hopefully we’ll bring mosquito spray too.
McGonagill: What about having a bicycle tour…
Generous: We can poll people to see who’s interested but yeah that might be interesting. Maybe
when the river trail’s redone that would be a good place to go.
McGonagill: That’s what I was thinking.
Generous: So that’s what we’re proposing or prepared for the Planning Commission as a work
program. If there are anything additionally you’d like us to add to that just let us know. Send it
over to Kate and we’ll include this and then we’ll submit this all to City Council and then
probably with your joint meeting.
Aanenson: Yeah so I say typically we put this out with your joint meeting in March we put this
report so the council can see kind of what the main projects that we’ve done.
McGonagill: Kate is the other committees, commissions like economic commission we have
now and parks commission, do they have work plans like this?
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
27
Aanenson: Our’s is more prescriptive in the city code but they do, each of those commissions do
have a work plan that they share with the City Council because our plan’s a little bit different.
Our’s is more reactive you know except for when we look at the long range planning items that
we’re looking at. Maybe it’s other commissions so for example Bob mentioned senior friendly
so they’ve got the dementia. They’ve been working in that is a big initiative. This is the senior
commission. They also want to look at you know housing types so they’ve kind of asked us to
maybe kind of you know we work together with that so and it might take, have them come
educate some of the things that they’re interested when we look at housing projects.
McGonagill: If I can make a suggestion. Maybe just some time staff can just come in with a
summary of this is the key points that each of these commissions are doing.
Aanenson: Absolutely.
McGonagill: I don’t think they need to trot in here. They just say this is where they’re pushing
and we’ll go okay.
Aanenson: Yeah and most of them are working on right now, the Economic Development
Commission is working on their list and I’ll be sharing it with them in March so I think after
everybody’s gone that route with the City Council and kind of got their yes we’re going down
this path and I’d be happy to collect all those and share them with you so yeah. I think it’s
helpful too when we do the tour it’s nice to know what’s on the mind of the other commissions
too.
McGonagill: Correct, thank you.
Aanenson: Thank you.
Skistad: So is that Moments senior housing that’s a memory care of some kind?
Aanenson: It’s kind of like Beehive if you think about, it’s more they have their own room but
they eat collectively and yeah, kind of like a living room kind of setting yep so.
Weick: Are there other presentations or?
Aanenson: That’s it.
Weick: That is it. We skipped over if there were any commissioner presentations we can
certainly hear those now or comments. If not I guess we would entertain a motion to adjourn.
McGonagill: I want to stay here.
Weick: Okay.
Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 21, 2020
28
Skistad: I’ll offer a motion to adjourn.
Weick: We have a motion, do we have a second?
Tietz: Second.
Skistad moved, Tietz seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion
carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was
adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Submitted by Kate Aanenson
Community Development Director
Prepared by Nann Opheim
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Approve a Request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for the Purpose of Repairing Landslides
Along A Portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail
Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3.
Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202001
PROPOSED MOTION
The City Council approves the Interim Use Permit, Planning Case #202001, to permit grading, excavation and
slope restoration as proposed on the plans prepared by Barr Engineering Co., dated December 13, 2019, subject to
the Conditions of Approval in the Planning Commission staff report, and adopts the Planning Commission's Findings
of Fact.
Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.
SUMMARY
The project includes landslide repairs on the Minnesota Bluff LRT Regional Trail within the Hennepin County Regional
Railroad Authority (HCRRA) on the north and south side of the trail.
BACKGROUND
In June of 2014, several areas of the HCRRA’s corridor in Chanhassen were damaged by a storm. The most
significant damage was an 80foot slope failure that required total closure of the trail between Pioneer Trail and
Highway 101.
DISCUSSION
The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) has submitted an application to excavate up to
approximately 24,800 cubic yards (CY) on a portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail located just
northwest of 220 Flying Cloud Drive (Moon Valley Aggregate). The purpose of this work is to repair damage due to
landslides that occurred after a high intensity rain event in June of 2014. Two repair areas will require grading and
excavation as part of the proposed permit – the north repair area and the south repair area.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Interim Use Permit to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as proposed
on the plans prepared by Barr Engineering Co., dated December 13, 2019, subject to the Conditions of Approval and
adoption of the Findings of Fact.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectApprove a Request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for the Purpose of Repairing LandslidesAlong A Portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional TrailSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202001PROPOSED MOTIONThe City Council approves the Interim Use Permit, Planning Case #202001, to permit grading, excavation andslope restoration as proposed on the plans prepared by Barr Engineering Co., dated December 13, 2019, subject tothe Conditions of Approval in the Planning Commission staff report, and adopts the Planning Commission's Findingsof Fact.Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe project includes landslide repairs on the Minnesota Bluff LRT Regional Trail within the Hennepin County RegionalRailroad Authority (HCRRA) on the north and south side of the trail.BACKGROUNDIn June of 2014, several areas of the HCRRA’s corridor in Chanhassen were damaged by a storm. The mostsignificant damage was an 80foot slope failure that required total closure of the trail between Pioneer Trail andHighway 101.DISCUSSIONThe Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) has submitted an application to excavate up toapproximately 24,800 cubic yards (CY) on a portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail located justnorthwest of 220 Flying Cloud Drive (Moon Valley Aggregate). The purpose of this work is to repair damage due tolandslides that occurred after a high intensity rain event in June of 2014. Two repair areas will require grading andexcavation as part of the proposed permit – the north repair area and the south repair area.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends approval of the Interim Use Permit to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as proposed
on the plans prepared by Barr Engineering Co., dated December 13, 2019, subject to the Conditions of Approval and
adoption of the Findings of Fact.
ATTACHMENTS:
Interim Use Permit #202001
Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 21, 2020 Part 1
Planning Commission Staff Report dated January 21, 2020 Part 2
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES
INTERIM USE PERMIT #2020-01
1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen
hereby grants an interim use to permit for grading, excavation and slope restoration on the
Minnesota Bluff LRT Regional trail within the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
(HCRRA) on the north and south side of the trail per plans prepared by Barr Engineering Co.,
dated December 13, 2019.
2. Property. The permit is for the following described property ("subject property") in
the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota:
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) right-of-way for Minnesota
River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail in Sections 25, 34, 35 and 36, Twsp 116, Range 23,
Carver County, Minnesota.
3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions:
a) The interim use permit shall be approved for a period of two (2) years from the
date of City Council approval. The applicant will need to request a formal
extension 60 days prior to the expiration date of the interim use permit.
b) Permits from the appropriate regulatory agency must be obtained; including but
not limited to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Lower Minnesota River
Watershed District and Carver County.
c) The applicant must provide the city with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the
amount of 110% of the construction costs for the appropriate phase of the grading
operations to guarantee erosion control measures, site restoration, and compliance
with the interim use permit.
d) Documentation and/or load tickets from the approved waste disposal facility
where contaminated soils will be disposed of shall be provided to the city.
e) All required Right-of-Way (ROW) permits, access agreements, and temporary
construction easements shall be secured prior to the commencement of any
construction activities.
f) All oversize/overweight (OS/OW) loads leaving the site to the east must apply for
County Transportation OS/OW trip permits.
g) Permitted hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday with no work permitted on Sunday
or legal holidays.
2
h) If any excess material is hauled to another site in Chanhassen, a separate grading
permit will be required for the other property.
i) The applicant shall schedule a walk-through of the site with city staff to review
boundary staking and removals of edge trees prior to any activity commencing.
j) The applicant shall identify conservation easement boundary on site. Vegetation
within the easement may not be irrevocably damaged by construction activities. If
irrevocable damage is caused, the applicant shall be responsible for replacement
plantings at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches.
k) Applicant shall report tree removal quantities to the city.
l) Upon completion of the installation of initial erosion control measures, the
contractor shall contact the city’s Engineering Department (Ryan Pinkalla, 952-
227-1173) for an initial erosion control inspection prior to grading operations.
m) HDPE pipe installed shall be furnished with tracer wire meeting the City of
Chanhassen’s Standard Specifications.
n) The applicant shall submit hydraulic design calculations and follow-up analysis
for the newly proposed stormwater conveyance system, including analysis for
riprap stilling basins and rock check dams as energy dissipaters.
o) One hundred percent (100%) construction plans shall be provided for review and
approval prior to commencement of any construction activities.
p) The applicant shall enter into maintenance agreements with the city and/or Lower
Minnesota River Watershed District to ensure maintenance responsibilities and
ownership are the responsibility of the HCRRA or their designee, in perpetuity,
prior to commencement of any construction activities.
q) The applicant shall provide further justification to the wetlands being impacted
being incidental. This can be accomplished through the WCA permit process that
is currently underway.
4. Termination of Permit. The city may revoke the permit following a public hearing
for violation of the terms of this permit.
5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction
has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an
extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance.
6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this Interim Use Permit is a criminal
misdemeanor.
3
Dated: February 10, 2020
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
By:
Mayor
By:
City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
(ss.
COUNTY OF CARVER )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2019, by Elise Ryan, Mayor, and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by
its City Council.
Notary Public
DRAFTED BY:
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF
REPORT
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
Subject Consider a Request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) and Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) for
the Purpose of Repairing Landslides Along a Portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail
Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1.
Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202001
PROPOSED MOTION:
The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the Interim Use Permit, Planning Case
#202001, to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as proposed on the plans prepared by Barr
Engineering Co., dated 12/13/2019, subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopt the Findings of Fact and
Recommendation.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The project includes landslide repairs on the Minnesota Bluff LRT Regional trail within the Hennepin County Regional
Railroad Authority (HCRRA) on the north and south side of the trail.
APPLICANT
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
SITE INFORMATION
PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District (A2)
LAND USE:Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority RightofWay
ACREAGE: 7.22 acres
DENSITY: NA
APPLICATION REGULATIONS
Chapter 7, Article III. Excavating, Mining, Filling and Grading
Chapter 20, Sections 20231 through 20237, Conditional Use Permits (Interim Use Permits are processed in the
same manner as Conditional Use Permits)
Chapter 20, Article X, “A2”, Agricultural Estate District
BACKGROUND
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, January 21, 2020SubjectConsider a Request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) and Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) forthe Purpose of Repairing Landslides Along a Portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional TrailSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case No. 202001PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the Interim Use Permit, Planning Case#202001, to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as proposed on the plans prepared by BarrEngineering Co., dated 12/13/2019, subject to the Conditions of Approval, and adopt the Findings of Fact andRecommendation.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe project includes landslide repairs on the Minnesota Bluff LRT Regional trail within the Hennepin County RegionalRailroad Authority (HCRRA) on the north and south side of the trail.APPLICANTHennepin County Regional Railroad AuthoritySITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING: Agricultural Estate District (A2)LAND USE:Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority RightofWayACREAGE: 7.22 acres DENSITY: NA APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 7, Article III. Excavating, Mining, Filling and GradingChapter 20, Sections 20231 through 20237, Conditional Use Permits (Interim Use Permits are processed in thesame manner as Conditional Use Permits)Chapter 20, Article X, “A2”, Agricultural Estate District
BACKGROUND
The trail ran on the embankment for 22 years; railroad cars ran on the embankment for almost 100 years before that.
In July 2014, several areas of the HCRRA’s corridor in Chanhassen were damaged by the storm events grouped as
Presidential Disaster 4182. The most significant damage was an 80foot slope failure that required total closure of the
trail between Pioneer Trail and Highway 101.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Interim Use Permit to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as proposed
on the plans prepared by Barr Engineering Co., dated 12/13/2019, subject to the Conditions of Approval in the staff
report and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
ATTACHMENTS:
Staff Report
Findings of Fact and Recommendation
Development Review Application
Application Narrative
Plan Sheets
Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application
Affidavit of Mailing
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
7700 MARKET BLVD.
P.O. BOX 147
CHANHASSEN, MN 55317
(952) 227-1100
STAFF REPORT
Prepared for the Planning Commission
Meeting Date:
City Council Date:
60-Day Review Deadline:
Case #:
Prepared By:
Phone:
Email:
January 21, 2020
February 10, 2020
February 18, 2020
2020-01
RG, EH, RP, JS
(952) 227-1131
bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.
mn.us
PROPOSED MOTION
“The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the Interim Use Permit, Planning
Case #2020-01, to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as proposed on the plans prepared by Barr
Engineering Co., dated 12/13/2019, subject to the Conditions of Approval and adopt the Findings of Fact and
Recommendation.”
GENERAL INFORMATION
Request: A request for an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for the purpose of repairing landslides along a portion of
the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail.
Site Address:
North of 220 Flying Cloud Drive (CSAH 61) PID: 259990600
(within the right-of-way for the regional trail)
Legal Description: In Sections 25, 34, 35 and 36, Twsp 116, Range 23, Carver County, Minnesota
Applicant Info:
Hennepin County Regional Rail
Authority
Owner
Info:
Hennepin County Regional Rail
Authority
Present Zoning: Agricultural Estate District (A2) 2020 Land Use Plan: Residential High Density
Acreage: 7.22 Density: NA
Location Map:
Planning Commission
Interim Use Permit, Planning Case No. 2020-01
January 21, 2020
Page 2
Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making:
The city has limited discretion in approving or denying Interim Use Permits for grading, based on whether or
not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance and Chapter 7 of the City Code. If the city
finds that all of the applicable standards are met, the permit must be approved. This is a quasi-judicial decision.
Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet.
PROPOSAL/SUMMARY
The project includes landslide repairs on the Minnesota Bluff LRT Regional trail within the Hennepin County
Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) on the north and south side of the trail. Landslide repair on the south
side will include stabilizing the south slope, repairing the south culvert outlet area and constructing a new storm
sewer and drainage ditch to direct water into the repaired area. Existing trail profile grades will be reduced with
the embankment slopes regraded to less steep grades and finished with turf reinforcement mats. The existing
damage concrete headwall will be removed and existing riprap will be salvaged for reuse. The south culvert
outlet area will be repaired with riprap, boulder cross vanes and a stilling basin. Work in the north area will
include removal of existing pipe debris, placement of riprap fill on the north slope and abandonment of the
existing pipe crossing beneath the trail. Drainage will be rerouted from the north pipe area via a new buried
storm sewer and lined drainage channel, which will discharge to the south culvert outlet area.
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
Chapter 7, Article III, Excavating, Mining, Filling and Grading
Chapter 20, Sections 20-231 through 20-237, Conditional Use Permits (Interim Use Permits are processed in the
same manner as Conditional Use Permits)
Chapter 20, Article X, “A-2”, Agricultural Estate District
SITE CONSTRAINTS
Wetland Protection
There is a wetland located on the property. The proposed grading does not directly impact the wetlands.
Bluff Protection
There are bluffs on the property. The proposed improvements are to eliminate erosion of the bluff.
Shoreland Management
The property is not located within the Shoreland Overlay District for Rice Lake.
Floodplain Overlay
This property is not within a floodplain.
Planning Commission
Interim Use Permit, Planning Case No. 2020-01
January 21, 2020
Page 3
BACKGROUND
The trail ran on the embankment for 22 years; railroad cars ran on the embankment for almost 100 years before
that. In July 2014, several areas of the HCRRA’s corridor in Chanhassen were damaged by the storm events
grouped as Presidential Disaster 4182. The most significant damage was an 80-foot slope failure that required
total closure of the trail between Pioneer Trail and Highway 101. This trail is a well-used segment of a large
regional network that serves recreational and commuter users. Its closure requires a six-mile detour.
The HCRRA had worked with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and State of Minnesota staff
since June 2014 to restore the slope and reopen the trail. The HCRRA planned to restore the slope in the
summer of 2016 before receiving notice from FEMA that their application for public assistance had been
denied. The denial was appealed in 2016, but public assistance was again denied.
GRADING
The Hennepin County Regional
Railroad Authority (HCRRA) has
submitted an application to excavate
up to approximately 24,800 cubic
yards (CY) on a portion of the
Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail
located just northwest of 220 Flying
Cloud Drive (Moon Valley
Aggregate). The purpose of this work
is to repair damage due to landslides
that occurred after a high intensity rain
event in June of 2014. Two repair
areas will require grading and
excavation as part of the proposed
permit – the north repair area and the
south repair area.
Landslide repairs in the south repair area, seen in Figure 1, will include: stabilizing the slope south of the
existing regional trail; repairing the south culvert outlet area by removing the existing damaged concrete
headwall, regrading, and installing a new pipe apron; constructing a new storm sewer and drainage ditch to
direct water into the repaired area; and reducing trail profile grades where the landslide occurred by regrading
the embankment slopes to less steep grades, coupled with the installation of turf reinforcement mats. This area
includes the rehabilitation of the stream bed.
Figure 1 - Construction Area
Planning Commission
Interim Use Permit, Planning Case No. 2020-01
January 21, 2020
Page 4
Work in the north repair area, seen in Figure
2, will include: removal of existing pipe
debris; placement of riprap fill on the slope
north of the existing trail; and abandonment
of the existing pipe crossing beneath the trail.
Drainage will be rerouted from the north pipe
area via a new horizontal directional drilled
storm sewer pipe to a lined drainage channel,
which will discharge to the south culvert
outlet area. Plans for redirecting the water
were provided to the Lower Minnesota River
Watershed District for review and comment
on December 12, 2019.
Stockpile areas have been identified to be
located in staging areas. Due to the limited
areas to stockpile material on site, the
applicant has expressed that the contractor
will likely choose to put any excavated
material directly in trucks to export.
Excavated material will include soil and
unsalvageable riprap. The total estimated quantity provided by the applicant of excavated material is 22,814
CY, with 19,990 CY being common (non-contaminated) and 2,824 CY being special (contaminated material).
The contaminated soils were limited to shallow soils on or near the trail and are attributed to the fact that the
trail was a past railroad line. The applicant has indicated that all contaminated soils will be exported offsite to
an approved waste disposal facility as recommended by the Environmental Soil Investigation provided on
April 4, 2018 by Kevin Eisen, PE, PMP, a Senior Geological Engineer with BARR.
The applicant is proposing two separate accesses to the repair areas. Access to the north repair area will be
from Highview Drive along the trail, located in Eden Prairie, while access to the south repair area is tentatively
planned to be from Flying Cloud Drive via the Moon Valley Aggregate property. Both accesses will require
permissions from each entity: a right-of-way (ROW) permit from the City of Eden Prairie, and a private access
agreement with Moon Valley Aggregate and the landowner. Along with applicable ROW permits and access
agreements, any work that encroaches into adjacent properties outside HCRRA’s property will require
temporary construction easement(s).
Figure 2 - South Repair Area
Planning Commission
Interim Use Permit, Planning Case No. 2020-01
January 21, 2020
Page 5
The equipment that will utilize the access
routes will include a backhoe (or similar
excavator), small bulldozers, light bobcat(s)
and trucks to transport personnel, equipment
and material. It is proposed that construction-
related traffic and haul routes will utilize
Hennepin County Highway 1 (Pioneer Trail)
and Carver County Highway 61 (Flying Cloud
Drive) to get to and from the sites. Flying
Cloud Drive will be rated for a 10-ton per axle
road. All oversize/overweight loads leaving
the site to the east must apply for County
Transportation OS/OW trip permits.
Although there are no residential, commercial
or industrial developments immediately
adjacent to the areas where construction will
be taking place, construction traffic will be
utilizing the trail which does run near
residential areas. The applicant is proposing
that the work is anticipated to occur between
the months of February and December of 2020.
Due to the period of construction and the proximity of residential areas near the trail, construction hours will be
limited to those hours listed in Sec. 13-52.c of City Ordinance which pertain to construction activities in
conjunction with improvement projects (7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on
Saturdays with no work on Sundays or public holidays). Any requests to work beyond those hours shall be
made to the Public Works Director/City Engineer for review and approval. The applicant should be aware that if
excess material is transported to another site in Chanhassen, a separate grading permit will be required for the
other property.
The applicant has submitted plans showing tree removal and restoration to be done as part of the trail repairs.
On either side of the trail are non-developed areas that are fully wooded with native species, such as maples,
lindens, oaks, elms, cottonwoods, etc. On the south side of the trail there is an outlot of Settlers West, owned
by the city and covered by a Conservation Easement. The construction plans show no impact to this area, but
construction limits are directly adjacent to the outlot so staff will be monitoring to ensure there is no
encroachment.
Tree removal will occur along the trail in the repair areas shown in the plans. City Code requires trees 6” and
larger to be shown on plans. However, due to the density of trees, it was recommended to the applicant that a
field inventory during the project will be better suited to the conditions. Therefore, restoration quantities are not
available with the application. Staff will be monitoring and confirming the tree removal for the project and the
applicant is required to plant replacements at a rate of 1:1 for all trees 6” and larger. Replacement trees will be
selections of native overstory and understory species.
Figure 3 - North Repair Area
Planning Commission
Interim Use Permit, Planning Case No. 2020-01
January 21, 2020
Page 6
EROSION CONTROL
Erosion control has been shown on the plan in general conformance with City Ordinance Sec. 19-145 (Erosion
and Sediment Control) and industry best management practices. Efforts shall be made by the applicant to
ensure erosion control practices remain up to date with city standards, ordinances, and best management
practices. If erosion control measures installed in conjunction with this IUP are deemed by the city to be
ineffective, the city will inform the applicant in writing of any deficiencies. The applicant will be required to
remedy the deficiencies prior to continuing construction operations. Furthermore, upon completion of the
installation of initial erosion control measures as illustrated on the Erosion Control Plan and SWPPP, the
contractor shall contact the city for an initial erosion control inspection prior to grading operations.
Silt fence shall be furnished in accordance with MnDOT Construction Standards, Section 3886. Machine sliced
(MS) or hand installed (HI) woven geotextile silt fence must be installed in all areas specified in the Erosion
Control Plan. MS or HI woven geotextile silt fence must be reinforced using sediment logs, wire backing, or
other effective Best Management Practice.
Phasing is a very important management tool for erosion control, thus one repair area should be stabilized prior
to grading and construction operations of the next repair area. Stabilization of the slope north of the repaired
culvert in the south repair area is needed immediately upon final grading. Stabilization should continue to be
done in phases. Large portions of the site should not be left exposed over weekends or during forecasted heavy
rains. Due to the steep slopes and long runs of the slopes, bio-rolls may be needed to aid in stabilization. Bio-
rolls would help break up the length of slope and minimize erosion potential of the slope with the erosion
control blankets. Six-inch bio-rolls are needed every 15 to 20 feet on steep slopes with exposed soils. Proper
blanket application is crucial for this site. The blankets must make 100% contact with the soil and stapled
according to manufacturer’s specifications. The staple pattern is vital to proper blanket function. The blankets
should be head trenched as well. Geotextile and riprap or geogrids or other approved stabilization is needed to
provide toe protection; there is a chance the toe of the 2:1 slope may start head cutting without toe protection.
Depending on the final soil-used blanket, application may be difficult. For example if the soil is too sandy,
stapling the blanket over long runs will not be successful. ‘Terracing’ blankets or using strips of blankets with a
heavy application of seed mix (20 pounds per acre) and hydromulch may be needed.
Exposed, unworked soils must continue to be stabilized with temporary or permanent stabilization BMPs in
accordance with the construction sequencing as stated in the Erosion Control Plan and the SWPPP.
Additionally, unworked erodible soils with positive slopes must continue to be stabilized using erosion control
blanket or alternate effective BMPs.
Subsurface stormwater movement should be considered with surface movement of stormwater. The applicant
provided figures of ground water elevations from the County Atlas Series, Carver County, Atlas C-21, Part B,
Plate 6. When considering stormwater management, installation of draintile at the toe should be considered to
reduce any future possibility of sloughing due to saturation from ground water or slope seepage.
DRAINAGE
In conjunction with the landslide repairs in the north area, the applicant is proposing to abandon an existing 18”
ductile iron stormwater pipe that is located under the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail. The existing
stormwater pipe to be abandoned conveys treated stormwater from the neighboring subdivision, known as
“Settlers West”. In order to re-route the treated stormwater, the applicant has proposed to install a 24” HDPE
Planning Commission
Interim Use Permit, Planning Case No. 2020-01
January 21, 2020
Page 7
storm sewer pipe via horizontal directional drilling (HDD) to the west, replacing the abandoned conveyance
system to the north (under the Regional Trail), as seen from Figure 4. To ensure the HDD HDPE pipe can be
located in the future, it shall be furnished with tracer wire meeting the City of Chanhassen’s Standard
Specifications. Furthermore, HDD specifications should conform to the city’s Standard Specifications.
Figure 4 - North Area Stormwater Conveyance Reconfiguration
Rather than stormwater being conveyed under the trail and discharged to the north, the HDD pipe will discharge
drainage from the subdivision to the west into a proposed drainage channel, as seen from Figure 5. The
drainage channel will be constructed of a flexible concrete geogrid with rock checks installed approximately
every 50 feet. Additionally, a riprap stilling basin will be installed near the outlet of the HDD pipe to further
assist with energy dissipation and minimization of downstream scouring of the stream bed. While it appears
best practices and proper techniques were utilized in the design of these conveyance systems (size of HDPE
pipe, stilling basins, check dam spacing, etc.) the applicant did not provide hydraulic calculations or a drainage
report for review. The applicant shall submit hydraulic design calculations and follow-up analysis for the newly
proposed stormwater conveyance system, including analysis for riprap stilling basins and rock check dams as
energy dissipaters for a 100-year event. Upon submittal of this analysis, 100% plans shall be provided as the
applicant provided 90% plans with their IUP application.
Figure 5 - Proposed Drainage Channel
Planning Commission
Interim Use Permit, Planning Case No. 2020-01
January 21, 2020
Page 8
Lastly, stormwater infrastructure and appurtenances will eventually require maintenance, repairs, and potential
upgrades. As these improvements will not be owned and maintained by the City of Chanhassen, the applicant
shall enter into maintenance agreements with the city and/or Lower Minnesota River Watershed District to
ensure maintenance responsibilities and ownership are the responsibility of the HCRRA or their designee, in
perpetuity.
WETLANDS
The applicant is proposing 0.06 acres of temporary impact to WCA jurisdictional wetlands (Sheet G-05 and
G-06). The applicant has claimed that these wetlands are manmade ditch wetlands and should be considered
incidental, and thus not regulated under WCA. The applicant did not provide any evidence as to why these
should be considered incidental (as-builts, soils data, topography, historical aerials, etc.). While initial in-house
desktop review likely supports this claim, any evidence that might show these are in fact incidental wetlands
needs to be provided by the applicant. This can be accomplished through the WCA permit process that is
currently underway, in which a Notice of Decision on whether the wetlands being impacted are incidental or not
can be issued.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends approval of the Interim Use Permit to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration as
proposed on the plans prepared by Barr Engineering Co., dated 12/13/2019, subject to the Conditions of
Approval and adoption the Findings of Fact and Recommendation.
1. The interim use permit shall be approved for a period of two (2) years from the date of City Council
approval. The applicant will need to request a formal extension 60 days prior to the expiration date of the
interim use permit.
2. Permits from the appropriate regulatory agency must be obtained; including but not limited to the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency, Lower Minnesota River Watershed District and Carver County.
3. The applicant must provide the city with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of 110% of the
construction costs for the appropriate phase of the grading operations to guarantee erosion control measures,
site restoration, and compliance with the interim use permit.
4. Documentation and/or load tickets from the approved waste disposal facility where contaminated soils will
be disposed of shall be provided to the city.
5. All required ROW permits, access agreements, and temporary construction easements shall be secured prior
to the commencement of any construction activities.
6. All oversize/overweight loads leaving the site to the east must apply for County Transportation OS/OW trip
permits.
7. Permitted hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. on Saturday with no work permitted on Sunday or legal holidays.
Planning Commission
Interim Use Permit, Planning Case No. 2020-01
January 21, 2020
Page 9
8. If any excess material is hauled to another site in Chanhassen, a separate grading permit will be required for
the other property.
9. The applicant shall schedule a walk-through of the site with city staff to review boundary staking and
removals of edge trees prior to any activity commencing.
10. The applicant shall identify conservation easement boundary on site. Vegetation within the easement may
not be irrevocably damaged by construction activities. If irrevocable damage is caused, the applicant shall
be responsible for replacement plantings at a rate of 2:1 diameter inches.
11. Applicant shall report tree removal quantities to the city.
12. Upon completion of the installation of initial erosion control measures, the contractor shall contact the city’s
Engineering Department (Ryan Pinkalla, 952-227-1173) for an initial erosion control inspection prior to
grading operations.
13. HDPE pipe installed shall be furnished with tracer wire meeting the City of Chanhassen’s Standard
Specifications.
14. The applicant shall submit hydraulic design calculations and follow-up analysis for the newly proposed
stormwater conveyance system, including analysis for riprap stilling basins and rock check dams as energy
dissipaters.
15. One hundred percent (100%) construction plans shall be provided for review and approval prior to
commencement of any construction activities.
16. The applicant shall enter into maintenance agreements with the city and/or Lower Minnesota River
Watershed District to ensure maintenance responsibilities and ownership are the responsibility of the
HCRRA or their designee, in perpetuity, prior to commencement of any construction activities.
17. The applicant shall provide further justification to the wetlands being impacted being incidental. This can
be accomplished through the WCA permit process that is currently underway.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Findings of Fact
2. Development Review Application
3. Application Narrative
4. Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail Landslide Repairs plans Sheets G-01 through R-04
5. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application
6. Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List
g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-01 chanhassen slope failure project iup\staff report.docx
1
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RE:
Application of Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) for an Interim Use
Permit to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration.
On January 21, 2020, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly
scheduled meeting to consider the application of Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority for
an Interim Use Permit for the property located north of 220 Flying Cloud Drive within the right-
of-way for the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail. The Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing on the proposed interim use which was preceded by published and
mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to
speak and now makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The property is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District (A2).
2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Residential High Density use.
3. The legal description of the property is:
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA) right-of-way fo r Minnesota River
Bluffs LRT Regional Trail in Sections 25, 34, 35 and 36, Twsp 116, Range 23, Carver
County, Minnesota
4. When approving an Interim Use Permit, the city must determine the capability of a proposed
development with existing and proposed uses. The general issuance standards of the
conditional use Section 20-232, include the following 12 items:
a. The mining operation will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety,
comfort, convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. The site work
will result in the stabilization and re-vegetation of the slope and the reduction in site
erosion.
b. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will be consistent with the objectives
of the city's comprehensive plan and the zoning code by the protection and stabilization
of the slopes.
c. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will be designed, constructed,
operated and maintained so to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended
2
character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area
because the site will be re-vegetated and the slopes stabilized reducing site erosion. The
aesthetics of the site will be enhanced with the elimination of the slope sluffing,
gullies/ravines in the site and the establishment of site vegetation.
d. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will not be hazardous or disturbing
to existing or planned neighboring uses because the grading and drainage will be
contained within the site perimeters. Additionally, hours of operation are limited and
specific conditions of approval will be in place and enforced by the city.
e. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will be served adequately by
essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools; or will be
served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies
responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. The use is temporary which does
not need to be served by public facilities and services. The proposed grading will reduce
or eliminate erosion on the slope.
f. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will not create excessive
requirements for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic
welfare of the community since this is a temporary use. The repair of the slope will
reopen a regional trail corridor, which is heavily used.
g. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will not involve uses, activities,
processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to
any persons, property or the general welfare due to excessive production of traffic, noise,
smoke, fumes, glare, odors, rodents, or trash. The proposed grading could result in a
temporary increase in traffic, noise and fumes. The conditions of the approval will
provide standards by which the activities should be minimized.
h. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will have vehicular approaches to the
property which do not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic or surrounding
public thoroughfares. Through the use of signage, limits on the hours of operation, and if
traffic becomes congested, additional limits on the hours of hauling operation could be
instituted and potential traffic problems will be mitigated.
i. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will not result in the destruction, loss
or damage of solar access, natural, scenic or historic features of major significance. The
proposal will result in the removal of some existing canopy. However, the site will be re-
vegetated and there will be less bluff impact.
j. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will be aesthetically compatible with
the area since the grading and re-vegetation of the site will improve the site aesthetics.
3
k. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will not depreciate surrounding
property values since the plan will improve the site and its impacts on the surrounding
properties.
l. The slope restoration and stormwater improvements will meet standards prescribed for
certain uses as provided in Chapter 7, Article III of the Chanhassen City Code.
5. The planning report #2020-01 dated January 21, 2020, prepared by Erik Henricksen, et al, is
incorporated herein.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Interim Use
Permit to permit grading, excavation and slope restoration subject to the conditions of the staff
report.
ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 21st day of January, 2020.
CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION
BY:___________________________________
Steven Weick, Chairman
g:\plan\2020 planning cases\20-01 chanhassen slope failure project iup\findings of fact.docx
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division – 7700 Market Boulevard
Mailing Address – P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110
APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Submittal Date: PC Date: CC Date: 60-Day Review Date:
Section 1: Application Type (check all that apply)
(Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submittal information that must accompany this application)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.........................$600
Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers.....$100
Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
Single-Family Residence ................................$325
All Others.........................................................$425
Interim Use Permit (IUP)
In conjunction with Single-Family Residence..$325
All Others.........................................................$425
Rezoning (REZ)
Planned Unit Development (PUD) ..................$750
Minor Amendment to existing PUD.................$100
All Others.........................................................$500
Sign Plan Review...................................................$150
Site Plan Review (SPR)
Administrative..................................................$100
Commercial/Industrial Districts* ......................$500
Plus $10 per 1,000 square feet of building area:
(______ thousand square feet)
*Include number of existing employees: __________
*Include number of new employees: __________
Residential Districts.........................................$500
Plus $5 per dwelling unit (BBBBB units)
Subdivision (SUB)
Create 3 lots or less ........................................$300
Create over 3 lots.......................$600 + $15 per lot
(_____ lots)
Metes & Bounds (2 lots)..................................$300
Consolidate Lots..............................................$150
Lot Line Adjustment.........................................$150
Final Plat.......................................................... $700
(Includes $450 escrow for attorney costs)*
*Additional escrow may be required for other applications
through the development contract.
Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300
(Additional recording fees may apply)
Variance (VAR).................................................... $200
Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP)
Single-Family Residence............................... $150
All Others....................................................... $275
Zoning Appeal...................................................... $100
Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $500
NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently,
the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application.
Notification Sign (City to install and remove)......................................................................................................................$200
Property Owners’ List within 500’(City to generate after pre-application meeting)..................................................$3 per address
(____ addresses)
Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply).......................................................................$50 per document
Interim Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Agreement
Wetland Alteration Permit
'HHGV
Conditional Use Permit
Vacation
Metes & Bounds Subdivision (GRFV)Easements (____ easements)
TOTAL FEE:
Section 2: Required Information
Description of Proposal:
Property Address or Location:
Parcel #: Legal Description:
Total Acreage: Wetlands Present?Yes No
Present Zoning: Requested Zoning:
Present Land Use Designation: Requested Land Use Designation:
Existing Use of Property:
Check box iI separate narrative is attached.Interim Use Permit Application Attached.
Not Applicable
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
$1,032.00
The purpose of the planned work is to repair landslides along a portion of the Minnesota Bluffs
LRT Regional Trail that occurred in 2014.
Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail
259990600 Sections 34, 35, 36 and 25, T116, R23, Carver County, Minnesota
7.22 ✔
Select One Not Applicable
Select One Not Applicable
Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail
✔
Chanhassen Landslide Repair Project
Interim Use Permit Application
Prepared on behalf of
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
Prepared for
City of Chanhassen
December 2019
4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55435
952.832.2600
www.barr.com
Chanhassen Landslide Repair Project
Interim Use Permit Application
Prepared on behalf of
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
Prepared for
City of Chanhassen
December 2019
P:\Mpls\23 MN\10\23101014 Landslides in Chanhassen HCRRA\_04 Chanhassen Slope Failure Const Plans\WorkFiles\Permitting\City of
Chanhassen\Chanhassen IUP v3.docx
i
Chanhassen Landslide Repair – Interim Use Permit Application
List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location
Figure 2 LiDAR Map
Figure 3 National Wetlands Inventory Map
Figure 4 Wetland Delineation Map
Figure 5 FEMA Floodplain Map
Figure 6 Public Water Inventory Map
Figure 7 Water Table Depth
Figure 8 Water Table Elevation
Figure 9 Well Locations
List of Attachments
Attachment 1 Proof of Ownership
Attachment 2 Landowner List
Attachment 3 Construction Design Plans
Attachment 4 Draft Specifications for Horizontal Directional Drilling
Attachment 5 Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota
1
1 Introduction
This application is prepared to fulfill the City of Chanhassen Interim Use Permit requirements as outlined
in the City Code Chapter 7, Article III, Section 7-35. The application is organized to correspond to each
numbered item under Section 7-35 (b).
Project Description
The scope of the project includes landslide repairs on a portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail
in Chanhassen, MN owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA). Two areas will
be repaired as part of this project – the north repair area and the south repair area. Project access will be
from Highview Drive in Eden Prairie, proceeding southwest along the trail to the site, and also from Flying
Cloud Drive through the Moon Valley Aggregate operated property (final access route through Moon
Valley Aggregate operated property pending property owner authorization).
Landslide repairs in the south repair area will include stabilizing the south slope, repairing the south
culvert outlet area and constructing a new storm sewer and drainage ditch to direct water into the
repaired area. Plans for redirecting the water were provided to the Lower Minnesota River Watershed
District for review and comment on December 12, 2019. The response from the watershed district will be
provided to the City upon receipt.
Existing trail profile grades will be reduced with the embankment slopes regraded to less steep grades
and finished with turf reinforcement mats. The existing damaged concrete headwall will be removed and
existing riprap will be salvaged for reuse. The south culvert outlet area will be repaired with riprap,
boulder cross vanes, and a stilling basin.
Work in the north area will include removal of existing pipe debris, placement of riprap fill on north slope,
and abandonment of the existing pipe crossing beneath the trail. Drainage will be rerouted from north
pipe area via new buried storm sewer and lined drainage channel, which will discharge to the south
culvert outlet area.
2 Interim Use Permit Application
Item 1: The name and address of the operator and owner of the land, together with proof of
ownership. If the operator and owner are different, both must sign the application.
Contact Information
Owner: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
Mailing Address: 701 4th Ave. S, Suite 400, Minneapolis MN 55415
Contact Person: Jessica Galatz, Project Manager
Phone Number: (612) 348-2691
Email: jessica.galatz@hennepin.us
Alternate Contact Person: Kristine Stehly, Project Engineer
2
Phone Number: (612) 348-6370
Email: kristine.stehly@hennepin.us
Proof of ownership is provide in Attachment 1.
Item 2: The correct legal description of the property where the activity is proposed to occur.
All that part of a variable width strip of land in Sections 34, 35, 36 and 25, Township 116, Range 23, Carver
County, Minnesota, being former railroad right of way. Subject to existing public roads and highways, and
easements of record, if any.
Item 3: A certified abstract listing the names of all landowners owning property within 500 feet of
the boundary of the property described above.
The City of Chanhassen provided the applicant with a list of landowners located within 500 feet of the
property boundary on December 2, 2019. Refer to Attachment 2.
Item 4: Specifications of the following, using appropriate maps, photographs and surveys:
Full project specifications are provided in the construction design plans as Attachment 3. Draft
specifications for horizontal directional drilling (HDD) are provided as Attachment 4. Once a final copy of
the HDD specifications is available it will be provided to the city.
a. Proposed grading plan
Refer to the attached construction design plans, sheet G-08 (Attachment 3).
b. Proposed stockpile sites
Stockpiling will occur in the areas identified as staging areas on plan sheet G-05 (Attachment 3). There is
limited space for stockpiling material on the site. The contractor will likely choose to put any excavated
material directly in trucks to export from the site and stockpile temporarily stripped topsoil on site. It is
likely that material will also need to be imported and stockpiled at the site within the staging areas on
plan sheet G-05 (Attachment 3). Imported material will include riprap, granular filter, and topsoil.
c. The physical relationship of the proposed designated site to the community and existing
development.
The project site is located on a portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail in the Rice Lake area just
north of Flying Cloud Drive. The project will take place on Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
property. Two repair areas are part of this project – north repair area and south repair area. A gravel pit
owned by Moon Valley Aggregate is located southeast of the south repair area. There are no other
residential, commercial or industrial developments immediately adjacent to the north and south repair
3
areas. Residential areas are located on either side of the trail in the northeast portion of the project area
(Figure 1). The northeast portion of the trail will be used for construction access only.
d. Site topography and natural features including location of watercourses and waterbodies.
The trail slopes down from the northeast towards the southwest with an approximate elevation of 880
feet at the northeast access point coming down to 830 feet at the south repair area. Topography on either
side of the trail is variable but generally downward sloping. Refer to sheet G-08 (Attachment 3) and Figure
2 for elevation contours within the project area. Wetlands are located on either side of the trail along the
access with a small percentage located within the construction limits (Figure 3 and 4; sheets G-05 and G-
06, Attachment 3). A small wetland is located northeast of the north repair area outside of the
construction limits (Figure 4). A stream channel runs adjacent to the trail from the northeast. The stream
channel is outside of the construction limits at the north repair area and flows under the trail via the south
culvert in the south repair area (Figure 4). No other waterbodies are located within the project footprint.
The site is not within a designated floodplain (Figure 5). A Public Water Inventory basin (unnamed) is
located northwest of the access at Highview Drive but is not within project limits and will not be impacted
by construction activities (Figure 6).
e. The description and quantity of material to be excavated.
Excavated material will include soil and riprap. The total estimated quantity of excavated material is:
• Excavation – common (non-contaminated material): 19,990 cubic yards
• Excavation – special (contaminated soil): 2824 cubic yards
The trail lowering portion of the project will require extensive excavation and some of the material on the
surface is contaminated. Contaminated soil will be exported offsite to an approved waste disposal facility.
No new soil will be needed as the finished grade is much lower than existing grade.
f. The depth of water tables throughout the area.
Refer to Figures 7 and 8 for water table depths/elevations. Depth to water table is approximately 0 to 25
feet in most of the south repair area, 25 to 75 feet along the trail and, 0 to 25 feet in the north repair area.
g. The location and depth of wells and buried garbage, water and fill.
There are no public or domestic wells within the project footprint, refer to Figure 8. No buried garbage or
fill was identified at the site.
Item 5: The purpose of the operation.
The purpose of the planned work is to repair landslides along a portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT
Regional Trail that occurred in 2014. In addition to the landslide repairs, a new storm sewer and drainage
channel are proposed to be constructed on the south side of the trail that will drain to the south culvert
area. The south culvert will also undergo repairs. The culvert located in the north repair area will be filled
and abandoned in place.
4
Item 6: The estimated time required to compete operation.
Tree clearing will occur prior to the work required to complete the repairs. In total, construction time is
expected to be no greater than ten months.
Item 7: Hours and months of operation.
Work will occur within regular hours, starting no earlier than 7:00 a.m. and finishing no later than 6:00 p.m.
on a daily basis. Work is anticipated to occur between the months of February and December of 2020.
Item 8: A tree survey indicating the location and type of all trees over six inches in caliper. In a
heavily wooded area only the boundaries of the tree areas must be indicated on the survey.
A tree survey was conducted to identify trees over 6 inches in diameter at breast height (dbh). The area
within the construction limits is heavily wooded. Collecting individual tree locations was not feasible given
that the area is heavily wooded. Instead, a square measuring 2,500 square feet was surveyed in three
different locations along the south repair area. On average, about 7 trees at or above 6 inches dbh were
identified within the surveyed squares. Tree clearing will take place in areas as necessary within the limits
of construction (Attachment 3) and will be avoided to the extent practicable. Trees over 6 inches dbh that
are removed during construction will be counted and replanted at a 1:1 ratio within the construction limits
during restoration as space allows. Some areas where trees will be removed will not be replanted due to
new features being constructed. Refer to sheet R-03 (Attachment 3) for the tree replacement plan.
Item 9: An end use landscape plan and interim screening plan for the operation period.
The restoration plan is provided in Attachment 3, sheets R-01 through R-04. An interim screening plan is
not applicable to this project.
Item 10: The plan of operation, including processing, nature of the processing and equipment,
location of the plant source of water, disposal of water and reuse of water.
Not applicable.
Item 11: Travel routes to and from the site and the number and type of trucks that will be used.
Access to the north repair area will be from Highview Drive along the trail. An access road will be
constructed from Highview Drive for truck and equipment access. An application for a right-of-way permit
will be submitted to the City of Eden Prairie once the contractor has been selected and construction dates
are finalized. The City of Eden Prairie permit is required to obtained authorization for constructing a
temporary access route in the City of Eden Prairie right-of-way. The timeline for submitting the
application in late winter/spring of 2020 and the application requirements have been discussed with the
City of Eden Prairie. Access to the south repair area will be from Flying Cloud Drive via Moon Valley
Aggregate property (pending owner approval). Equipment used will include a backhoe or similar
excavator, small bulldozers, light bobcat(s), and trucks to transport personnel, equipment and material.
5
Beyond the direct access routes into the project area, it is anticipated that most construction related traffic
would use County Highway 1 and County Highway 61.
Item 12: Plans for drainage, erosion and sediment control and dust control.
No drainage will occur as part of this project. Erosion and sediment control best management practices
(BMPs) are outlined in the storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) included in Attachment 3,
sheets C-05 and C-06.
Item 13: A restoration plan providing for the orderly and continuing restoration of all disturbed
land to a condition equal to or better than that which existed prior to the earth work. Such plan
shall illustrate, using photographs, maps and surveys where appropriate, the following:
a. The contour of the land prior to excavation and proposed contours after completion of
excavation and after completion of restoration.
Refer to Figure 2 for current topographic contours and refer to Attachment 3, sheet G-08 for topographic
contours after project completion (regraded area along trail modifications).
b. Those areas of the site to be used for storage of topsoil and overburden.
The site does not currently contain much topsoil. It is anticipated that the contractor will strip what topsoil
they can and stockpile it in the staging areas, but most of the topsoil used in site restoration will likely
need to be imported.
c. A schedule setting forth the timetable for excavation of land lying within the extraction facility.
Refer to items 6 and 7 for a schedule of the proposed activities.
d. The grade of all slopes after restoration, based upon proposed land uses, and description of the
type and quantity of plantings where revegetation is to be conducted.
Refer to Attachment 3, sheets G-08 for area that will be regraded and sheets R-01 through R-03 for the
restoration plans. The construction area will be re-seeded using MnDOT approved seed mixes. Types of
seed mixes are outlined on the restoration plan (sheet R-01, Attachment 3) with a total area to be seeded
of up to 7.41 acres.
e. The criteria and standards to be used to achieve final restoration as well as intermittent
stabilization.
Intermittent stabilization will be achieved with the use of erosion and sediment control BMPs. Final
restoration will be achieved per the restoration plan (sheet R-01 through R-03, Attachment 3). For further
information refer to the SWPPP on sheets C-05 and C-06 (Attachment 3).
6
Item 14: A statement identifying the applicant's program to insure compliance with the permit
conditions, method of response to complaints and resolving conflicts that may arise as a result of
complaints.
HCRRA will obtain coverage under the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s General Permit for
Construction Stormwater. As such, required inspections under that coverage will be completed and will
serve as means to oversee compliance with the permit conditions. Conflicts that are brought to the City’s
attention can be directed to Jessica Galatz (612) 348-2691.
Item 15: Unless exempt under Minnesota Rules, an environmental assessment worksheet, if
required by the city.
Not applicable.
Item 16: A wetland alteration permit, if required by the City Code, which shall be processed
concurrently with the excavation permit application.
A joint application form for activities affecting water resources in Minnesota was submitted to the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and serves to fulfill the city’s wetland alteration requirement. It is provided as
Attachment 5 for reference.
The application materials are supported by field delineations completed in 2015 and 2019. Delineation
work was confirmed by the City of Chanhassen’s technical evaluation panel, as noted in the attached
application materials.
Figures
MN River Bluffs LRTHighviewDrSierraTrPioneer CirLakeland TerV o g e Far m Tr
Sett l e r s Ct TrailsEndRdSet
tl
ement
DrPioneer Tr E x p l o re rT rMeadowlarkLaFoxHol
l
owDrFlying Cloud D
r
D e e rb ro o kD r45671
456714
456761
HennepinHennepinCountyCounty
CarverCarverCountyCounty
TWP 116W
RNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116WRNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116W
RNG 22N
SEC 22
TWP 116WRNG 22N
SEC 22
Eden Prairie
Chanhassen
SITE LOCATION
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 1
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-20 21:57 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig02 LiDAR Map.mxd User: mrq0 700
Feet
!;NMinnesota Bluff Rivers
LRT Regional Trail
Construction Limits
County Boundary
Municipal Boundary
Public Land
Survey Section
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
HighviewDrSierraTrPioneer CirLakeland TerVoge FarmTr
Set t l e rsCt TrailsEndRdS
e
t
tl
e
mentDrPioneer Tr
E x p l o re rT rMeadowlarkLaFoxHollowDrFlying Cloud Dr
D
eerbrook
Dr
45671
456714
456761870850820
800
780
750740730710700910880900860840790
760
770
720
920
910
88087084083089
0 850890880830
810 82080076075074078077082080080
0
79
078
0
9
1
0 9009
2
0
910 88087089087083082076075090089090089081
0
790
7709
2
0
900
8808808808508208108
1
0930920920 910910910
910
910
890890900
900
9
0
0 900900890
890870870860
840 8108007907807
7
0
7
4
0
720900LIDAR MAPMinnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope StabilizationChanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 2
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-20 21:57 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig02 LiDAR Map.mxd User: mrq0 700
Feet
!;NConstruction Limits
Surface Elevation (Carver Co., 2011)
10-foot Contour
2-foot Contour Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
Highview DrSierraTrPioneer CirLakeland TerV o g e Far m Tr
Sett l e r s Ct TrailsEndRdS
e
t
t
l
eme
nt
DrPioneer Tr E x p l o re rT rMeadowlarkLaFoxHol
l
owDrFlying Cloud D
r
D e e rb ro o kD r45671
456714
456761
HennepinHennepinCountyCountyCarverCarverCountyCounty
PEMA
PEMC
L1UBH
PEMC
PEMC
PUBG
PUBGx
PEMF
PFO1Cd
PUBGx
PEMCd
PEMCd PEMCd
PUBFd
PFO1C
PEMCd
TWP 116W
RNG 23N
SEC 25
TWP 116WRNG 23N
SEC 36
TWP 116W
RNG 22N
SEC 30
TWP 116WRNG 22N
SEC 31
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 3
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-20 21:59 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig03 National Wetland Inventory.mxd User: mrqConstruction Limits
Public Land Survey Section
County Boundary
Wetlands (National Wetlands Inventory)
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 700Feet!;N
Highview DrLakeland TerPioneer Tr
Trails End Rd456714
45671
WETLAND DELINEATION MAPMinnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope StabilizationChanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 4
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-21 09:14 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig04 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
TrailsEndRdWETLAND DELINEATION MAPMinnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope StabilizationChanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 4
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-21 09:14 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig04 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
TrailsEndRdWETLAND DELINEATION MAPMinnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope StabilizationChanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 4
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-21 09:14 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig04 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
WETLAND DELINEATION MAPMinnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope StabilizationChanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 4
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-21 09:14 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig04 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Culvert Pipe
Delineated Wetlands
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
WETLAND DELINEATION MAPMinnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope StabilizationChanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 4
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-21 09:14 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig04 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Culvert Pipe
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
HighviewDrSierraTrPioneer CirLakeland TerV o g e Far m Tr
Sett l e r s Ct TrailsEndRdSet
tl
ement
DrPioneer Tr E x p l o re rT rMeadowlarkLaFoxHol
l
owDrFlying Cloud D
r
D e e rb ro o kD r45671
456714
456761
HennepinHennepinCountyCountyCarverCarverCountyCounty
TWP 116W
RNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116WRNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116W
RNG 22N
SEC 22
TWP 116WRNG 22N
SEC 22
FEMA FLOODPLAIN MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 5
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-20 22:01 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig05 FEMA Floodplain.mxd User: mrqConstruction Limits
Public Land Survey Section
County Boundary
FEMA Flood Hazard
Special Flood Hazard Area with
Base Flood Elevation (Zone AE)
Area of Minimal Flood
Hazard (Zone X)
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 700Feet!;N
Unnamed
Unnamed
Lake Riley
Rice Lake
Unnamed
45671
456714
456761
HennepinHennepinCountyCountyCarverCarverCountyCounty
101
912C
TWP 116WRNG 23NSEC 23
TWP 116WRNG 23NSEC 23
TWP 116WRNG 22NSEC 22
TWP 116WRNG 22NSEC 22
B lu ffC re e k
RileyCreek
PUBLIC WATER INVENTORYMinnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope StabilizationChanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 6
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-21 09:17 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig06 Public Water Inventory.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
Public Land Survey Section
County Boundary
Public Water Inventory Watercourses
Public Water Inventory Basins Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 1,000
Feet
!;N
HighviewDrSierraTrPioneer CirLakeland TerVo g e Fa rm Tr
Set t l e r sCt TrailsEndRdSet
t
l
ementDrPioneer Tr
E x p lo r e r TrMeadowlarkLaFoxHollowDr
Flying Cloud
Dr
D
eerbrook
Dr
45671
456714
456761
HennepinHennepinCountyCounty
CarverCarverCountyCounty
TWP 116W
RNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116WRNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116W
RNG 22N
SEC 22
TWP 116W RNG 22NSEC 22870850820
800
780
750720710700910880900860840790
760
920
910
900880850830890
8
7
0 890880830
810 82080076075074082080080
0
79
07809
1
0 9009
2
0
910 8808708308207707
5
0900890900890
730
72081
0
740840790
7
8
0
7709
2
0
900
8808908808808508208108
1
0 760930920920
9
1
0910
910
910
910
890890900
900
9
0
0 900900890
890870870870860
8408108007907807
7
0
740
900
WATER TABLE DEPTH
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 7
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-20 22:06 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig07 Water Table Depth.mxd User: mrqConstruction Limits
Public Land Survey Section
County Boundary
Depth to Water Table (ft)
0 to 10
>10 to 25
>25 to 50
>50 to 75
Surface Elevation (Carver Co., 2011)
10-foot Contour
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 700Feet!;N Note:Water table elevation data is from the County Atlas Series,Carver County, Atlas C-21, Part B, Plate 6; Minnesota DNR
HighviewDrSierraTrPioneer CirLakeland TerVo g e Fa rm Tr
Set t l e r sCt TrailsEndRdSet
t
l
ementDrPioneer Tr
E x p lo r e r TrMeadowlarkLaFoxHollowDr
Flying Cloud
Dr
D
eerbrook
Dr
45671
456714
456761
HennepinHennepinCountyCounty
CarverCarverCountyCounty
TWP 116W
RNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116WRNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116W
RNG 22N
SEC 22
TWP 116W RNG 22NSEC 22870850820
800
780
750720710700910880900860840790
760
920
910
900880850830890
8
7
0 890880830
810 82080076075074082080080
0
79
07809
1
0 9009
2
0
910 8808708308207707
5
0900890900890
730
72081
0
740840790
7
8
0
7709
2
0
900
8808908808808508208108
1
0 760930920920
9
1
0910
910
910
910
890890900
900
9
0
0 900900890
890870870870860
8408108007907807
7
0
740
900
WATER TABLE ELEVATION
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 8
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-20 22:04 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig08 Water Table Elevation.mxd User: mrqConstruction Limits
Public Land Survey Section
County Boundary
Water Table Elevation (ft MSL)
>700 to 725
>725 to 750
>780 to 800
>800 to 825
>825 to 850
>850 to 875
>875 to 900
>900 to 925
>925 to 950
Surface Elevation (Carver Co., 2011)
10-foot Contour
0 700Feet!;N
Note:Water table elevation data is from the County Atlas Series,Carver County, Atlas C-21, Part B, Plate 6; Minnesota DNR
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
00453959
260 ft
00195526
440 ft
00433438
320 ft
00424017
260 ft
00520460
280 ft
00493945
347 ft
00435412
297 ft
00536939
340 ft
00668017
295 ft
00453903
277 ft
00541667
270 ft
00458081
271 ft
00439529
287 ft
00122946
280 ft
00105357
220 ft
00227329
241 ft00484845
272 ft
00130757
164 ft
00212690
300 ft
00195525
160 ft
00475742
290 ft00573595
245 ft
00433632
315 ft
00453954
285 ft
00536287
260 ft
00118816
230 ft
00137392
272 ft
00743436
291 ft
00493905
260 ft
00439540
283 ft
00677872
326 ft
00526430
275 ft
00206822
229 ft
00229183
154 ft
00515575
249 ft
00137399
275 ft
00109903
250 ft
00477431
306 ft
00479338
275 ft
00686563
277 ft
00475747
256 ft 00426535
241 ft
00493927
297 ft00475748
295 ft
00536284
280 ft
00479344
305 ft
00561384
265 ft
00453728
290 ft
00464905
257 ft
00575573
197 ft
00428205
259 ft
00206851
260 ft
00466476
320 ft
00475734
295 ft
00441544
260 ft
00147875
418 ft
00435449
215 ft
00521939
242 ft
00109888
260 ft
00658634
232 ft
00404365
380 ft
00510419
310 ft
00426576
278 ft
00258792
0 ft
00736175
224 ft
00458121
250 ft
00441130
292 ft
00627239
242 ft
00554078
250 ft
00127512
277 ft
00477427
290 ft
00118819
305 ft
00520188
298 ft
00441140
260 ft
00696454
285 ft
00615591
215 ft
00481909
216 ft
00109929
230 ft
00405097
180 ft
00439506
259 ft
00439502
296 ft
00481250
220 ft
00548545
310 ft
00565734
320 ft
00522177
168 ft
00532587
218 ft
00818035
261 ft
00825607
367 ft
HennepinHennepinCountyCounty
CarverCarverCountyCounty
NEARBY WATER WELLS
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 9
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-11-20 22:08 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\City_Permit_Nov2019\Fig09 Nearby Water Wells.mxd User: mrqConstruction Limits
County Boundary
Well - County Well Index
!>Domestic
!>
Public Supply/Non-Community
Transient
!>Public Supply/Non-Community
0 700Feet!;N
00258792
230 ft
Unique ID
Depth
Attachments
Attachment 1
Proof of Ownership – Hopkins to Chaska Deed
Attachment 2
Landowner List
Chanhassen Landslide Repair – Interim Use Permit ApplicationLANDOWNER LIST ‐ provided by City of Chanhassen 12‐2‐19PIN TAX_NAME TAX_ADD_L1 TAX_ADD_L2 SITEADD254090030 MATTHEW J CHRISTENSEN 10 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 553178627 10 PIONEER TRL257560410 JOE MORRISON 100 8TH AVE S UNIT 106 HOPKINS, MN 55343‐10029 TRAILS END RD253350020 SUSAN V RECH 1000 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 553189520 1000 HESSE FARM RD257560390 TINA RISCH 10005 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10005 TRAILS END RD253350030 JOHN D & BARBARA J FORCE 1001 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 553189527 1001 HESSE FARM RD257560130 CHRISTOPHER & MICHELE A J FAZI 10012 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10012 TRAILS END RD257560400 DANIEL J JOST 10017 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10017 TRAILS END RD253350010 PAUL W & SUSAN M ALLEN 1002 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 553189520 1002 HESSE FARM RD257560140 JUDY E MANEY TRUST 10024 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10024 TRAILS END RD257560150 STACEY M BURROUGHS REV TRUST 10036 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 10036 TRAILS END RD257560160 MICHAEL J KANE 10048 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10048 TRAILS END RD257560420 HEATHER HOLLAND NEUBAUER 10053 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 10053 TRAILS END RD257560170 MATTHEW T KEEN 10060 TRAILS END RUN CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 10060 TRAILS END RD257560430 WILLIAM & ELIZABETH PETA 10065 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10065 TRAILS END RD257560180 CHRISTOPHER & ERIN WETMORE TRUSTS 10072 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10072 TRAILS END RD257560440 PAUL A & SHERYL A CARLSON 10077 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10077 TRAILS END RD257560190 SCOTT ANSETH 10084 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10084 TRAILS END RD257560200 DANIEL W ABERCROMBIE 10096 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 10096 TRAILS END RD257560500 SETTLERS WEST LP 10096 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174594 9841 TRAILS END RD257560210 PHILIPPE O SCHWOB 10112 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174593 10112 TRAILS END RD253300100 RUSSELL A LEIGHTON JR 1025 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 553189527 1025 HESSE FARM RD253320160 MARY E BRIOL 10377 HEIDI LN CHASKA, MN 553189516 10377 HEIDI LN253320270 MICHAEL PARADIS REV TRUST 10421 BLUFF CIR CHASKA, MN 553189534 10421 BLUFF CIR253320230 BEVERLY J ZIMMER 10440 BLUFF CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 10440 BLUFF CIR253320250 SCOTT A LINDBLAD 10441 BLUFF CIR CHASKA, MN 553189534 10441 BLUFF CIR253320240 WILLIAM N DECOULOS 10460 BLUFF CIR CHASKA, MN 553189534 10460 BLUFF CIR257420120 ELIZABETH M VOGEL REV TRUST 105 PIONEER TR CHANHASSEN, MN 553178660 105 PIONEER TRL253300110 KEVIN E & JANET S WINTER 1075 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 553189527 1075 HESSE FARM RD254090010 BRYAN & ANGELA MALONEY LIV TRUST 108 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 553178659 108 PIONEER TRL253300120 NANCY MADSEN REV TRUST 1101 HESSE FARM RD CHASKA, MN 553189526 1101 HESSE FARM RD250360700 BEATRICE I ZWIERS IRREV TRUST 11111 DEUCE RD ELKO, MN 55020‐9591 220 FLYING CLOUD DR250360200 MOON VALLEY AGGREGATES INC 11111 DEUCE RD ELKO, MN 55020 100 FLYING CLOUD DR250350800 GORAN PUJIC 1161 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318 1161 BLUFF CREEK DR250350700 ALAN L JONGERIUS 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 553189515 1190 BLUFF CREEK DR253300140 LEO RICHARD DEE & KAREN COUGHLIN DEE TRS 1201 HESSE FARM CIR CHASKA, MN 553189518 1201 HESSE FARM CIR253320260 MAREN DVORAK 1221 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 553189515 1221 BLUFF CREEK DR253300150 BRIAN JAY BIELKE 1225 HESSE FARM CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 1225 HESSE FARM CIR253250050 JEFFREY M GOOD 1231 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 553189515 1231 BLUFF CREEK DR253250040 THOMAS GNANAPRAGASAM 1251 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 55318 1251 BLUFF CREEK DR
Chanhassen Landslide Repair – Interim Use Permit ApplicationLANDOWNER LIST ‐ provided by City of Chanhassen 12‐2‐19253300160 MAUREEN ANN GRAZZINI TRUST 1251 HESSE FARM CIR CHASKA, MN 55318 1251 HESSE FARM CIR253250030 NICHOLAS WARITZ 1271 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 553189515 1271 BLUFF CREEK DR257980010 P R KELLY PROPERTIES LLC 13991 KENSINGTON AVE NE PRIOR LAKE, MN 55372‐550 FLYING CLOUD DR250350500 HEIDI R MOE 1425 BLUFF CREEK DR CHASKA, MN 553189515 1201 BLUFF CREEK DR3.01162E+12 JOSH & JULIE TAYLOR 1510 MIDWAY LN GLENVIEW IL 60026‐7792 19018 VOGEL FARM TR250351810 SKIP S COOK 15506 VILLAGE WOODS DR EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55347‐1439 10551 GREAT PLAINS BLVD250250800 WILLIAM C GRIFFITH 185 PIONEER TRL CHANHASSEN, MN 553178660 185 PIONEER TRL250360100 RILEY PURGATORY BLF CRK WS 18681 LAKE DR E CHANHASSEN, MN 553173.01162E+12 RYAN & HEATHER ZICK 18936 EXPLORER TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 18936 EXPLORER TR3.01162E+12 WESTON T & LARUA K ROPER 18945 EXPLORER TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 18945 EXPLORER TR3.01162E+12 GREGORY & COLLEEN WEBER 18948 EXPLORER TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 18948 EXPLORER TR3.01162E+12 MICHAEL & CARIN VIERTEL 18957 EXPLORER TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 18957 EXPLORER TR3.01162E+12 RANIA DOUBAL BACHOUR 19042 VOGEL FARM TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 19042 VOGEL FARM TR3.01162E+12 JEFFREY V & JENNIFER J JIOVANAZZO 19066 VOGEL FARM TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 19066 VOGEL FARM TR3.01162E+12 RICHARD J & SUSAN J LANAHAN 19090 VOGEL FARM TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 19090 VOGEL FARM TR3.01162E+12 WILLIAM & PATRICIA BARTRAM 19114 VOGEL FARM TR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 19114 VOGEL FARM TR250362500 RUSSELL J BARTO II 1969 WOODSTONE LN VICTORIA, MN 55386‐9639 410 LAKOTA LN250362900 DAN & VALERIE TESTER 230 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318‐9532 230 FLYING CLOUD DR250363300 STEVEN JON & ANGELA S SMITH 240 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 553189532 240 FLYING CLOUD DR250363200 MAX LAUREANO 250 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318 250 FLYING CLOUD DR259990600 HENNEPIN CO REG RR AUTHORITY 300 6TH ST S SW STREET LEVEL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55487‐0999 Null250362020 RUSSELL & YVONNE BARTO 400 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 553189452250362400 RUSSELL J & YVONNE L BARTO TRUST 400 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 553189452 400 LAKOTA LN250363800 MATHEW JOHNSON 415 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 553189457 415 LAKOTA LN251300050 KEVIN FALCONER 425 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318 425 LAKOTA LN251300040 WANDA SYNSTELIEN 445 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 553189457 445 LAKOTA LN250360710 CHARLIE D HAZZARD 450 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 553189533 450 FLYING CLOUD DR250363100 ALVIN R LEBENS 460 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 55318 460 FLYING CLOUD DR250362800 MICHAEL S SPIESS 470 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 553189533 470 FLYING CLOUD DR251300030 DONAVON GLOUDE 495 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318 495 LAKOTA LN250350111 STATE OF MINNESOTA ‐ DNR 500 LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL, MN 55155‐4045251300020 ECO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 510 PLEASANTVIEW RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 535 LAKOTA LN258490010 MARTIN K & KATHLEEN M SCHUTROP 540 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 553189453 540 LAKOTA LN251300010 HEATHER LYNN SILVA 565 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 55318 565 LAKOTA LN250362210 CHRISTOPHER R KNUTSON 575 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 553189455 575 LAKOTA LN250362200 JOHN C SCHWANKE 595 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 553189456 595 LAKOTA LN250361300 608 FLYING CLOUD LLC 608 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 553189502 608 FLYING CLOUD DR250362220 JAMES A & BONNIE B SWANSEN 615 LAKOTA LN CHASKA, MN 553189455 615 LAKOTA LN3.01162E+12 HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 61 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED3.01162E+12 SETTLERS WEST HO ASSOC ‐ COMMUNITY DEV INC 7100 MADISON AVE W GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427 61 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
Chanhassen Landslide Repair – Interim Use Permit ApplicationLANDOWNER LIST ‐ provided by City of Chanhassen 12‐2‐193.01162E+12 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 8080 MITCHELL RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 61 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED250351710 HAGEN LAWN & LANDSCAPE LLC 850 FLYING CLOUD DR CHASKA, MN 553189503 850 FLYING CLOUD DR3.01162E+12 MARK W & SUZAN R KAMMER 9600 HIGHVIEW DR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 9600 HIGHVIEW DR257420110 JONATHAN P & JOANN DIMINO 9751 MEADOWLARK LN CHANHASSEN, MN 553178826 9751 MEADOWLARK LN3.01162E+12 KARL REYNOLDS & CHRISTI HART 9800 TRAILS END RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 9800 TRAILS END RD3.01162E+12 THOMAS A & KELLY A HOPPER 9805 TRAILS END RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 9805 TRAILS END RD3.01162E+12 KRISTA A HAYEK & PETER N WHITE IV 9812 TRAILS END RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 9812 TRAILS END RD3.01162E+12 MICHAEL & AMY RUETZ 9817 TRAILS END RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 9817 TRAILS END RD252640160 NATHAN H GRIFFITHS 9821 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 553178550 9821 DEERBROOK DR3.01162E+12 JEFFREY J HOLM & JENNIFER EKEREN‐HOLM 9824 TRAILS END RD EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 9824 TRAILS END RD257560010 MICHAEL A & CHRISTINE M MANNO 9836 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174591 9836 TRAILS END RD252640150 TRUST AGREEMENT OF RICHARD & CATHERINE M 9841 DEERBROOK CHANHASSEN, MN 553178550 9841 DEERBROOK DR257560020 DANIEL S LAUN 9848 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174591 9848 TRAILS END RD257560300 SCOTT LAUERMAN 9853 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174591 9853 TRAILS END RD257560030 SARAH J BREIT 9860 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9860 TRAILS END RD252640140 ANN K LONSTEIN REVOCABLE TRUST 9861 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 553178550 9861 DEERBROOK DR257560040 JASON BURLAGE 9872 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9872 TRAILS END RD252640130 JOHN M & LINDA J REVIER 9881 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 553178550 9881 DEERBROOK DR252640120 RYAN & COURTNEY DUNLAY 9901 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 553178552 9901 DEERBROOK DR257560310 A JEFFREY KARSCHNIK 9905 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9905 TRAILS END RD257560050 JARED JOHN GRUNIG 9912 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9912 TRAILS END RD257560320 ELIZABETH A FARRELL9917 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9917 TRAILS END RD252640110 KIRK D HEISSEL 9921 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9921 DEERBROOK DR257560060 JASON EMMETT 9924 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9924 TRAILS END RD257560330 LENNART J JOHNSON 9929 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9929 TRAILS END RD257560070 WILLIAM J ROUSE 9936 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9936 TRAILS END RD252640100 ROSS L HABBEN 9941 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9941 DEERBROOK DR257560340 JON FRANSWAY 9941 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9941 TRAILS END RD257560080 STEVEN C KIMES 9948 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9948 TRAILS END RD257560350 ROBERT G DAUB REV TRUST 9953 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9953 TRAILS END RD257560090 XIANGDONG LIN 9960 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9960 TRAILS END RD252640090 JENNIFER M PALMQUIST 9961 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 553178552 9961 DEERBROOK DR257560360 CHRISTOPHER C ATTERBERRY 9965 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9965 TRAILS END RD257560100 JAMES DOBCHUK 9972 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9972 TRAILS END RD257560370 STEVEN R PASCHKE 9977 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9977 TRAILS END RD252640070 PAUL J TAUNTON 9980 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 553178551 9980 DEERBROOK DR252640080 JIMMY M & MARY E ROANE 9981 DEERBROOK DR CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9981 DEERBROOK DR257560110 RANDALL S & MELODEE D BROOKS 9984 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9984 TRAILS END RD257560380 MATTHEW J WILLIAMS 9989 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 9989 TRAILS END RD257560120 RICHARD BARBARI 9996 TRAILS END RD CHANHASSEN, MN 553174592 9996 TRAILS END RD
Chanhassen Landslide Repair – Interim Use Permit ApplicationLANDOWNER LIST ‐ provided by City of Chanhassen 12‐2‐19256010020 PCH DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 94 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 10520 GREAT PLAINS BLVD
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-01_TITLE SHEET AND INDEX.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:18 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTITLE SHEET, PROJECT LOCATION, ANDSHEET INDEX23101014.04-G-01 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSPROJECT LOCATIONCARVER COUNTYCHANHASSEN, MN.NORTH REPAIR AREASOUTH REPAIR AREANORTH AREA ACCESS FROMHIGHVIEW DRIVEANTICIPATED RIGHT OF ENTRYFROM FLYING CLOUD DRIVE TOBOTTOM OF SLOPE OF SOUTHREPAIR AREAGENERAL NOTES:1. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET IS A COMBINATION OFDATA FROM: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY BARR ENGINEERING CO. IN JANUARY 2015,SURVEY CONDUCTED BY STONEBROOKE IN JANUARY 2019 AND MnDNR 2011 LiDARTOPOGRAPHY.2. IMAGERY; COPYRIGHT PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP AND HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA, 2015.3. HORIZONTAL DATUM AND COORDINATE SYSTEM: CARVER COUNTY COORDINATES,NAD83 HARN, US SURVEY FEET.4. VERTICAL DATUM: NGVD29.MOON VALLEYAGGREGATERICE LAKEGOPHER STATE ONE CALL:CALL BEFORE YOU DIG.1-800-252-1166FLYING
CLOUD
DR
IVE DEERBROOK DR
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
I
L
TRA
I
L
S
E
N
D
R
D
.LAKOTA LNPIONEER
TRA
ILGREAT PLAINS BLVDHWY 1011-PLAN: PROJECT LOCATIONN05001000SCALE IN FEETMINNESOTA
B
L
U
F
F
S
L
R
T
. . . . TITLE SHEET, PROJECT LOCATION, AND SHEET INDEXG-01G-02. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS - PLANC-06. . . . TRAIL MODIFICATIONS - PLAN AND PROFILEC-02C-01. . . . STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)C-03C-07C-08C-13C-05C-04G-03. . . . REMOVALS AND TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLANENGINEER CONTACT:Matt PetersonBarr Engineering Co.4300 MarketPointe Dr.Minneapolis, MN 55435952-832-2949mpeterson@barr.comOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVECONTACT:Jessica GalatzHennepin County Regional Railroad Authority701 Fourth Ave. S., Suite 400Minneapolis, MN 55415612-348-2691Jessica.Galatz@hennepin.usCONTACTS:. . . . SEEDING PLANR-01C-14C-09C-10C-11C-12. . . . RESTORATION DETAILSR-03G-04. . . . SITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL - OVERALL PLAN AND NOTESG-05G-06. . . . TRAIL CLOSURE SIGNAGE EAST OF LAKE RILEY. . . . STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES. . . . SITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL - PLANS. . . . SITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL - PLAN AND DETAILS. . . . TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DETAILS. . . . TRAIL MODIFICATIONS - CROSS SECTIONS. . . . TRAIL MODIFICATIONS - CROSS SECTIONS. . . . TRAIL MODIFICATIONS - TYPICAL SECTIONS. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS - PHOTOS . . . . SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR - PLAN. . . . SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR - SECTIONS. . . . STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNEL - PLAN AND PROFILE. . . . STREAMBANK REPAIR - DETAIL. . . . NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR - PLAN. . . . NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR - PROFILE, SECTION, AND DETAILC-15C-16C-17C-18C-19. . . . SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET AND STREAMBANK REPAIR - PLAN. . . . SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET REPAIR - PROFILE AND SECTIONSG-07. . . . LEGEND, NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND ALIGNMENT CONTROL DATA. . . . STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)C-20. . . . SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET REPAIR - SECTIONS AND DETAILSC-21. . . . STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNEL - SECTIONS AND DETAILS. . . . STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNEL - SECTIONS AND DETAILSR-02 . . . . EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AND MULCH PLANR-04. . . . TREE PLANTING PLAN. . . . PROJECT LAYOUT PLANG-08RI
L
E
Y
L
A
K
E
R
D
.LAKE RILEYINSTALL TRAIL CLOSURE SIGNAGEEAST OF LAKE RILEYSEE SHEET G-07
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-01_TITLE SHEET AND INDEX.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 9:48 AMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNLEGEND, NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND ALIGNMENT CONTROL DATA23101014.04-G-02 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.ABBREVIATIONSLEGENDCB CATCH BASINC.I.P. CAST-IN-PLACECLSM CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH MATERIALSCMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPECONC. CONCRETEEL. ELEVATIONFES FLARED END SECTIONI.E. INVERT ELEVATIONMH MANHOLEMnDOT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONNWL NORMAL WATER LEVELRCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPETRM TURF REINFORCEMENT MATCMPA CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ARCH1DETAIL: GRAPHICS STANDARDSDETAIL VIEW CALL OUTSCALE: 1=1SECTION VIEW CALL OUTSECTION VIEW TITLESECTION: GRAPHICS STANDARDS10SCALE: 1=1111101010GENERAL NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TOWORK.2. ALL EXISTING ROADS, PARKING LOTS, TRAILS, SIGNS, OR SIMILAR SHALL NOT BEDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SURVEYSWITH THE ENGINEER TO DOCUMENT PRE-CONSTRUCTION EXISTING CONDITION ISSUES.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TOCOMMENCEMENT OF GRADING FOR EACH LOCATION DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSIONCONTROL PLANS ARE PROVIDED INSIDE THE PROJECT STORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP).4. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE FINAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TOBE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER AND STAKED IN THE FIELD.5. CLEARING AND GRUBBING TO BE PERFORMED ONLY WITHIN GRADING LIMITS ANDACCESS ROUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.6. TREES TO BE CLEARED WILL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD BY ENGINEER. ALL TREES >= 6" INDIAMETER NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED.7. TREES IDENTIFIED BY ENGINEER FOR ADDITIONAL PROTECTION SHALL BE PROTECTEDAGAINST ROOT COMPACTION, DAMAGE AND DISFIGUREMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITHMnDOT SPEC. 2572. PROTECTION OF TREES NOT IDENTIFIED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BEINCIDENTAL.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSFER OF AQUATIC ANDTERRESTRIAL INVASIVE SPECIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE.EXISTING INDEX CONTOUREXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUREXISTING PARCEL LINEEXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING FIBER OPTICEXISTING FENCE LINEEXISTING CONSERVATION EASEMENTEXISTING STREAM THALWEGEXISTING STREAM EXTENTSEXISTING WETLANDCONSTRUCTION LIMITSPROPOSED INDEX CONTOURPROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOURPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED FENCECLEARING LIMITSSILT FENCEPROPOSED RIPRAPSTAGING AREA2015 SOIL BORINGEXISTING PIEZOMETER2018 SOIL BORING2019 SOIL BORING790788790788SSFOXWTSSPZ-1ST-1SB-1XTRAIL MODIFICATIONS CONTROL DATA - ALIGNMENT "T"TYPE/NO.L5L4L1L3C3C1C2START STATION8+93.46T6+98.92T0+00.00T4+18.32T8+09.77T2+74.65T6+07.62TSTART NORTHING165566.13165420.38164901.47165199.66165502.13165091.93165350.34START EASTING562121.28561992.54561526.73561600.03561819.44562067.41561724.57561934.04BEARINGN40°05'17"EN41°22'14"EN39°52'12"ERADIUS1000.00'1000.00'1000.00'END STATION12+01.99T8+09.77T1+00.00T2+74.65T6+07.62T8+93.46T4+18.32T6+98.92TEND NORTHING165810.29165502.13164969.49165091.93165350.34165566.13165199.66165420.38END EASTING562309.92562067.41561600.03561724.57561934.04562121.28561819.44561992.54189.30'LENGTH308.54'110.85'174.65'100.00'83.69'143.67'91.29'L21+00.00T164969.49PC STATIONPT STATION2+74.65T 4+18.32T6+98.92T6+07.62T8+93.46T8+09.77T0+57.27N166109.49562427.4203 S60°01'50"E 142.73'2+00.00N166038.19562551.07NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR CONTROL DATA - ALIGNMENT "N"TYPE/NO.L1START STATION START NORTHING START EASTING BEARINGRADIUSEND STATION END NORTHING END EASTINGLENGTHL2PC STATIONPT STATION0+00.00N166115.02562370.4194 S84°27'31"E 57.27'0+57.27N166109.49562427.42N33°54'46"EDRAINAGE CHANNEL AND STORM SEWER CONTROL DATA - ALIGNMENT "S"TYPE/NO.L5L4L1L2C2START STATION0+00.00SSTART NORTHING START EASTING BEARINGRADIUSEND STATION END NORTHING END EASTINGLENGTHC1PC STATIONPT STATION100.00'147.98'165393.40165553.35165270.60165708.50165975.17165582.74165424.43165582.74165393.40165975.17166040.09165708.501+82.14S3+47.52S1+47.98S8+07.79S8+89.87S4+97.93S3+15.21SN24°07'35"EN24°01'02"EN30°36'49"EN37°43'56"EN33°15'49"EN14°20'23"E34.16'32.32'309.87'82.08'150.40'133.06'165424.43165553.351+47.98S562110.90562193.47L3100.00'1+82.14S1+47.98S562193.47562207.36562207.36562240.32562240.32562253.411+82.14S3+15.21S3+47.52S3+15.21S 3+47.52S562253.41562335.914+97.93S562335.91562493.71562493.71562543.938+07.79S35.00'65.00'255.00'50.86'36.19'81.44'S76°09'17"WS17°27'51"WS11°04'29"E165127.63165161.71165241.29165116.50165127.63165161.702+37.43C1+86.58C1+50.39C0+68.95CS20°50'33"E68.95'165305.73165241.29SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET AND STREAMBANK REPAIR CONTROL DATA - ALIGNMENT "C"TYPE/NO.L1START STATION START NORTHING START EASTING BEARINGRADIUSEND STATION END NORTHING END EASTINGLENGTHC1PC STATIONPT STATION0+00.00CC2C30+68.95C562073.10562097.631+50.39C1+86.58C562097.63562113.21562102.49562113.21562057.34562102.490+68.95C1+50.39C1+86.58C2+37.43C1+86.58C1+50.39CST-7SYMBOLSALIGNMENT CONTROL DATACLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-01_TITLE SHEET AND INDEX.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 9:49 AMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN11/27/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES23101014.04-G-03 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIESITEM NO.ITEM DESCRIPTIONUNITTOTALESTIMATEDQUANTITY2021.501 MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM 12051.501 MAINTENANCE & RESTORATION OF HAUL ROADS LUMP SUM 12101.505 CLEARINGACRE 4.302101.505 GRUBBINGACRE 4.302104.502 REMOVE CONCRETE HEADWALLEACH 12104.502 REMOVE PIEZOMETEREACH 22104.502 SALVAGE BENCHEACH 12104.503 REMOVE WOOD RETAINING WALLLIN FT 312104.503 REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCELIN FT 24462104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) (NORTH PIPE)LIN FT 72104.607 SALVAGE RANDOM RIPRAPCU YD 1472104.601REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS (NORTH PIPE DEBRIS)LUMP SUM 12105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 5SQ YD16162105.601 DEWATERINGLUMP SUM 12105.601 CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROADLUMP SUM 12105.607 EXCAVATION - SPECIALCU YD 28242105.607 HAUL AND DISPOSE OF CONTAMINATED SOILCU YD 36712106.501 EXCAVATION - COMMONCU YD19,9902106.523COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD 18082112.603 SUBGRADE PREPARATIONLIN FT 10272118.507AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS SPECIALCU YD 962130.523WATER (DUST CONTROL)MGAL 152211.507AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5CU YD 2532451.507COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (CV)CU YD 92501.502 95" SPAN GS PIPE-ARCH APRONEACH12501.502 24" CAS PIPE APRONEACH22503.603 24" HDPE PIPE SEWER-DIRECTIONAL DRILLEDLIN FT3022503.603 PLUG FILL AND ABANDON PIPE SEWERLIN FT1152507.603LINING CULVERT PIPE (95" SPAN) SPECIALLIN FT 72511.504GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE 4SQ YD352511.507RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS SPECIAL (SALVAGE)CU YD 1472511.507RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS SPECIAL (R270)CU YD 4442511.507RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS SPECIAL (R470)CU YD 5402511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS IIICU YD 2922511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS IVCU YD 1282511.507 GRANULAR FILTERCU YD 1012511.507GRANULAR FILTER MOD (B3)CU YD 4052511.602 PLACE BOULDEREACH 202557.603 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCELIN FT 1752573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITLUMP SUM 22573.503SILT FENCE, TYPE MSLIN FT10,4222574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD 15362575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3NSQ YD12,4402575.504 FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID MATSQ YD12722575.504 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT CATEGORY 2SQ YD28202575.504 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 4SQ YD10,9902575.505 SEEDINGACRE 7.41CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
600'
10
0
'600'FOR DETAILED PLANSEECADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-04_SITE ACCESS PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:19 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROLOVERALL PLAN AND NOTES23101014.04-G-04 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.1-N0300600SCALE IN FEETFLYING
CLOUD
DR
IVE MOON VALLEYAGGREGATEANTICIPATED RIGHT OF ENTRY. ACCESSROUTE TO BE FINALIZED WITH PROPERTYOWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.RICE LAKEMINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILPIONEER
TRA
IL
TRAILS END ROADSITE ACCESS FROM HIGHVIEW DRIVEDEERBROOK DR
IVEHALLA GREENSGOLF COURSECONSTRUCTION LIMITSSOUTH REPAIR AREANORTH REPAIR AREA1G-05FOR DETAILED PLANSEE2G-05FOR DETAILED PLANSEE1G-06PLAN: OVERALL ACCESS PLANHIGH
V
I
E
W
D
R
I
V
ESITE ACCESS NOTES:1. LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE IN HIGHVIEW DRIVE AREA AREAPPROXIMATE. VERIFY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO MOBILIZING TO SITE. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR UTILITY LOCATE AND FIELD RECONNAISSANCE.2. POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTES ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. IF CONTRACTOR WISHES TO USEAN ALTERNATE ACCESS ROUTE, IT MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIORTO USE.3. TEMPORARY WETLAND FILL IS ONLY ALLOWED IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. DONOT PLACE FILL IN WETLANDS/DITCHES OUTSIDE OF THESE AREAS.4. SUBMIT MATERIAL PROPOSED FOR TEMPORARY FILL TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW.5. MAINTAIN FLOW IN DITCHES AND CONTROL WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAYINVOLVE THE INSTALLATION OF PIPES AND POTENTIALLY PUMPS.6. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCIDENTAL TO PAY ITEM 2051.501 MAINTENANCE & RESTORATIONOF HAUL ROADS:6.1. TRIMMING AND CLEARING TREES ALONG ACCESS ROUTE.6.2. FURNISHING AND INSTALLING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC IN WETLANDS6.3. FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLANDS6.4. CONTROLLING WATER AND MAINTAINING DRAINAGE IN DITCHES THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.6.5. PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL FILL AND/OR GRAVEL SURFACING OUTSIDE OF WETLANDAREAS AS CONTRACTOR DEEMS NECESSARY TO ACCESS THE SITE.6.6. REMOVAL OF GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND TEMPORARY FILL FROM WETLANDS UPON THECOMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.6.7. SEEDING IMPACTED WETLANDS UPON THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.6.8. REGRADING THE TRAIL FROM HIGHVIEW DRIVE TO THE LANDSLIDE UPON COMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTION AND RESTORING THE TRAIL TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS ORBETTER TO THE SATISFACTION OF ENGINEER. FURNISHING AND INSTALLING AGGREGATESURFACING SHOWN ON DETAIL 3 ON SHEET G-06 WILL BE PAID UNDER SEPARATE PAYITEM.6.9. ALL COORDINATION, PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION, AND RESTORATION ACTIVITIESASSOCIATED WITH ACCESS THROUGH MOON VALLEY AGGREGATE AND FROM HIGHVIEWDRIVE.7. PAY ITEM 2105.601 CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROAD IS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSROAD FROM HIGHVIEW DRIVE TO THE REGIONAL TRAIL JUST EAST OF PIONEER TRAIL THEFOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCIDENTAL TO PAY ITEM 2105.601 CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROAD:7.1. UTILITY LOCATE AND AVOIDANCE OF UTILITIES IN VICINITY OF ACCESS ROAD.7.2. ANY DESIGN NECESSARY FOR ACCESS ROAD.7.3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS ROAD (IF NECESSARY).7.4. SALVAGING AND REINSTALLING ANY SIGNS IN CONFLICT WITH ACCESS ROAD.7.5. PROTECTION OR SALVAGING AND REINSTALLING EXISTING GUARDRAIL.7.6. STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL UNDER FOOTPRINT OF RAMP (IF NECESSARY).7.7. REMOVAL OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF NECESSARY).7.8. WATER CONTROL, INCLUDING PIPES OR PUMPS TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE THROUGHACCESS ROAD DURING CONSTRUCTION.7.9. IMPORT OF FILL TO CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROAD.7.10. MAINTENANCE OF ACCESS ROAD DURING CONSTRUCTION.7.11. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY FILL FOR ACCESS ROAD.7.12. REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY BITUMINOUS PLACEMENT DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION.7.13. INSTALLING TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCH OR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TO RESTORETO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS OR BETTER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THEENGINEER.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2TRAFFIC SIGNSQTY.MNDOTSIGN NO.SIGN SIZE SIGN MESSAGE3W11-1036" x 36"W
1
1
-
1
0DWG. NO.G-04TRAILCLOSEDTRAILCLOSEDAHEAD3R20-3A36" x 36"G-06G-075R11-236" x 26"W
1
1
-
1
0
W11-10G-06G-07
WTWTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-04_SITE ACCESS PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:20 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROLPLANS23101014.04-G-05 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.1-NMOON VALLEYAGGREGATEMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAILMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAILMATCH LINE - PLAN 2
MATCH LINE - PLAN 1
050100SCALE IN FEET2-PLAN: SITE ACCESS & STAGING N050100SCALE IN FEETCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSSTAGING AREASOUTH REPAIR AREANORTH REPAIR AREAPARCEL LINE (TYP.)CONSERVATION EASEMENTNEW STORM SEWEREXISTING CMPCONSERVATION EASEMENTPROPERTY LINE (TYP.)PLAN: SITE ACCESS & STAGINGSILT FENCESEE1C-04EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINEEXISTING FENCEBEATRICE I. ZWIERSONIRREV. TRUSTSILT FENCESEE1C-04SILT FENCESEE1C-04MATCH LINE - SHEET G-06 POTENTIAL EASEMENT AREA (APPROX. 1.73 ACRES)OWNER: BEATRICE I. ZWIERSON IRREV. TRUSTHCRRAHCRRATEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT0.02 ACRES, SEETEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT<0.01 ACRES, SEEWETLAND BOUNDARYNEW DRAINAGECHANNEL2G-0629'2G-06179'EXISTING WOODEN FENCE(PROTECT OR SALVAGEAND REINSTALL FOLLOWINGCONSTRUCTION)RESTORE TRAIL PER UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION3G-06POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTEPOTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTERESTORE TRAIL PER UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION3G-06CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
WTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOECADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-04_SITE ACCESS PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:21 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN AND DETAILS23101014.04-G-06 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.SILT FENCESEEHIGHVIEW DRIVEMATCH LINE - SHEET G-05MINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAILCONSTRUCTION LIMITSPARCEL LINE (TYP.)SITE ACCESS FROM HIGHVIEWDRIVE - COORDINATE ACCESSWITH CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIEAND HENNEPIN COUNTYPIONEER TRAILT
R
A
I
L
S
E
N
D
R
O
A
D1-N050100SCALE IN FEETSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT,SEE4C-041C-04PLAN: SITE ACCESS & STAGINGHCRRAHCRRAHCRRAHCRRAHENN
E
P
IN
COUN
T
YCARV
ER
COUN
T
Y
HIGHVIEW DRIVEROW LINESCONSTRUCT ACCESS ROADAS NECESSARY FOREQUIPMENT ACCESSPROTECT EXISTING CULVERTS,MAINTAIN DITCH DRAINAGETHROUGH PROPOSED ACCESSROAD DURING CONSTRUCTIONPROTECT EXISTINGFIRE HYDRANTPROTECT EXISTINGLIFT STATIONEXISTING GUARDRAIL(PROTECT OR SALVAGE AND REINSTALLFOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION)TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT0.01 ACRES, SEETEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT0.02 ACRES, SEEWETLAND BOUNDARYDETAIL: TEMPORARY WETLAND/DITCH FILLINGNOT TO SCALE2-EXISTING NORTH WETLAND/DITCHEXISTING TRAILEXISTING SOUTH WETLAND/DITCHINSTALL MnDOT TYPE 5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PRIORTO PLACING FILL IN WETLANDREMOVE AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTIONTEMPORARY FILL REMOVEAT COMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTIONEXISTING GROUNDRESTORE WETLAND AND DITCH ATCOMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF WETLANDSEED MIX TO DISTURBED AREAS AFTERREMOVING FILL AND GEOTEXTILETEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT0.01 ACRES, SEEPASSING AREA: 20' WIDTH X100' LENGTH2-2-2-122'112'178'DETAIL: GRAVEL TRAIL RESTORATIONNOT TO SCALE3-REGRADE SURFACE TO PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITIONSOR BETTER TO SATISFACTION OF ENGINEER10' TRAIL3" THICK 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATESURFACING CLASS SPECIAL(SEE TABLE FOR GRADATION)EXISTING GROUND2.0%2.0%3/8" MINUS GRADATION FORAGGREGATE SURFACING(CLASS SPECIAL)SIEVE SIZEPERCENT PASSING3/8"100#470-100#4020-50#20010-30TABLE 1NOTES:1. 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACING SHALL BE 100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE.2. 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACING MUST COME FROM KRAEMER MINING &MATERIALS, INC. OF BURNSVILLE, MN., IN ORDER TO MATCH COLOR OF EXISTINGTRAIL.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2RESTORE TRAIL PER UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION3G-06TRAILCLOSEDTRAILCLOSEDAHEADTRAILCLOSEDTRAILS END ROAD℄MAINTAIN 10' VERTICAL CLEARZONE ABOVE TRAIL. TRIM TREEBRANCHES ACCORDINGLY.4NOTES:1. 2' WIDTH AT MAX. 2% SLOPE ON SHOULDER.2. 3:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE (H:V) OUTSIDE OF 2' SHOULDER.3. PREFERRED 3' CLEARANCE, 2' MIN. FORM TREES OROTHER OBSTRUCTION.4. SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR TRAIL STRIPING, IF APPLICABLE.5. BOULEVARD VARIES IN WIDTH, BUT SHOULD BE A MIN..OF 2',. SIGN INSTALLATION NOT APPLICABLE IN ALLAREAS.6. MAX. CROSS SLOPE 2%.7. MIN. 3' CLEARANCE BETWEEN EDGE OF TRAIL ANDEDGE OF SIGN.3" TYPE SPWEA240C BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNOTES:1. BITUMINOUS SHALL BE PLACED IN ONE LIFT.2. CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TOMnDOT SPEC. 3138.3. SUBGRADE SHALL BE TEST ROLLED PRIOR TOAGGREGATE BASE INSTALLATION AND CONFORM TOMnDOT SPEC. 2111.4. WHERE BOULEVARD IS 2' TO 3' (MIN.), BOULEVARDSHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM IMPERVIOUSMATERIAL (IE. BITUMINOUS, CONCRETE, PAVERS,ETC). SPECIAL STRIPING LAYOUT MAY APPLY, (SEEPLAN SHEETS).4-DETAIL: BITUMINOUS TRAIL RESTORATIONNOT TO SCALE6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE12" SCARIFY, DRY, AND RECOMPACTSUBGRADE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY OWNER.10'-0"6" TOPSOIL (TYP.)℄62ROADWAY7135TRAILCLOSEDREPAIR OR REPLACEBITUMINOUS TRAIL UPONCOMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTION, SEE4-
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-04_SITE ACCESS PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 11:43 AMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL CLOSURE SIGNAGE EAST OF LAKE RILEY23101014.04-G-07 A..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.MI
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
B
L
U
F
F
L
R
T
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
I
L RILEY LAKE RD.DELL RD.1-N0100200SCALE IN FEETPLAN: TRAIL CLOSURE SIGNAGE EAST OF LAKE RILEYCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION12/13/19----------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2TRAILCLOSEDAHEADPIONEER TRAILTRAILCLOSEDLAKE RILEYBEARPATH TRAILJACQUESPONDTRAILCLOSEDAHEADTRAILCLOSED
ST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-5ST-4PZ-2SB-3SB-2SB-1ST-1SB-5SB-6SB-4ST-7ST-8ST-9750750 750750760760 760760770770 770770780780 780780790790 790790790790790790790790790790790790 790790800800800800800800800800800800800800810810810810810810810810810810820820820820820820820820820820820820820820830830830830830830830830830830830830 830830840840840840840840840840840840840840840840850850
8508508608608
6
0
8
6
0
8708708
7
0
8
7
0
88088088
0
88
0
XXX750750760760 770770780780790790800800810810 820820 830830
7607607707707807807907908008008108108108108208207
9
0
7
9
0
8
0
0
8
0
0
810810820820N: 165093.23E: 561738.63N: 165106.02E: 561725.97N: 166065.67E: 562476.25N: 166146.44E: 562503.23CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-08_PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:26 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNPROJECT LAYOUT PLAN23101014.04-G-08 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.EXI
S
T
I
N
G
C
M
P
A
1-NSITE ACCESS FROMHIGHVIEW DRIVESCALE IN FEET100500NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR,SEE SHEET C-17MOON VALLEYAGGREGATECONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSSOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSEE SHEET C-11NEW FENCEMINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILFILL EXISTING NORTH PIPE WITHGROUT AND ABANDON IN PLACESEE SHEET C-18PARCEL LINE (TYP.)STREAM BANK REPAIRSEE SHEET C-13SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLETMODIFICATIONS,SEE SHEET C-13CONSERVATION EASEMENTTRAIL MODIFICATIONSSEE SHEET C-07PLAN: PROJECT LAYOUTBEATRICE I.ZWIERSONIRREV. TRUSTPARCEL LINEEXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINESUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED EASEMENT NEEDSLANDOWNERREASON FOR EASEMENTBEATRICE I. ZWIERSON IRRREV. TRUSTRIPRAP AT SOUTH PIPE OUTLET, STREAMBANKREPAIRS, DRAINAGE CHANNEL, STAGING AREAAND SOUTH SIDE SITE ACCESSMOON VALLEY AGGREGATESOUTH SIDE SITE ACCESSPOTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTENEW STORM SEWERSEE SHEET C-19EXISTING FENCENEW DRAINAGECHANNELSEE SHEET C-19CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2NEW FENCE,SEE3C-18POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTECLEARING LIMITS
WTWTWTWTWTWTWTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO
FOFOFOFOSS SS
SSSSSSSSSSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-5ST-4PZ-2SB-3SB-2SB-1ST-1SB-5SB-6SB-4ST-7ST-8ST-9750750 750750760760 760760770770 770770780780780780780780 780780790790790790790790 790790800800800800800800800800800800800800810810810810810810810810 810810820820820820820820820820820820820820 820820830830830830
83083083083083083083083083083083083083083083083083083084084084084084084084084084084084084084084085085085085086086086086087087087087088088088088089089089089090090090090077
0
77
0
77
0
77
0
780780780780790790800800810810810810820820820820 830830830830CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-01_EXISTING CONDITIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:29 PM
1-NSITE ACCESS FROMHIGHVIEW DRIVESCALE IN FEET100500MOON VALLEYAGGREGATECONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXI
S
T
I
N
G
C
M
P
A
MINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILPARCEL LINE (TYP.)CONSERVATION EASEMENTEXISTING 18" DIPAPPROXIMATE LANDSLIDE LIMITSEXISTING CHAINLINK FENCEEXISTING STREAM THALWEGEXISTING STORM SEWERCHAINLINK FENCENORTH PIPE CROSSING(SEE PHOTO 5, SHEET C-02)NORTH PIPE UPSTREAM INLET(SEE PHOTO 6, SHEET C-02)EXISTING FIBER OPTIC CABLEEXISTING CONCRETE HEADWALL(SEE PHOTOS 2-4, SHEET C-02)TEMPORARY REPAIR RIPRAP AREA(SEE PHOTOS 1-4, SHEET C-02)APPROXIMATE LANDSLIDE SPOIL PILEGENERAL NOTES:1. ALL UTILITY INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BEFIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR.PLAN: EXISTING CONDITIONSBEATRICE I. ZWIERSONIRREV. TRUSTPARCEL LINEEXISTING STREAM EXTENTSREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNEXISTING CONDITIONSPLAN23101014.04-C-01 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.APPROXIMATE SLOPEEROSION LIMITSEXISTING BENCHEXISTING WOODEN FENCE ANDMODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALLCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-02_EXISTING PHOTOS AND SECTIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:00 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..PHOTO 4: EXISTING SOUTH PIPE OUTLET (10/29/2019)PHOTO 2: EXISTING SOUTH PIPE OUTLET (4/26/2019)PHOTO 1: EXISTING SOUTH PIPE OUTLET (4/26/2019) (LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)PHOTO 3: EXISTING SOUTH PIPE OUTLET (10/29/2019)PHOTO 5: EXISTING NORTH PIPE DOWNSTREAM OUTLETPHOTO 6: EXISTING NORTH PIPE UPSTREAM INLET (4/26/2019)REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNEXISTING CONDITIONSPHOTOS 23101014.04-C-02 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
750750750750760760760760770770770770770770770770
770770 770770780780780780780780780780790790790790790790 7907908008008008008008008008008008008008008008008008008108108
1
0
8
1
0
810810810810810810810810810810
8
1
0
8
1
0 810810810810820820820820820820820820820820
82082082082082082083083083083083083083083083083083
0
83
0 830830830830840840840840840840840840840840
84
0
84
0 840840840840840840840840
8508508
5
0
8
5
0
850850 850850860860860860 870870870870880880WTWTWTWTWT WTST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-5ST-4PZ-2SB-3SB-2SB-1ST-1SB-5SB-6SB-4ST-7ST-8ST-9CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-03_EROSION CONTROL PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:01 PM1-PLAN: REMOVALS AND TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NSCALE IN FEET120600MOON VALLEYAGGREGATECONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING CMPAMINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILPROPERTY LINE (TYP.)CONSERVATION EASEMENTEROSION CONTOL LEGENDSILT FENCESEDIMENT LOGSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEXISTING 10' CONTOUREXISTING 2' CONTOURSILT FENCE (TYP.)SEE1C-04PROTECTEXISTING TRAILCONSTRUCTIONSTAGING AREAEROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES:1. INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS PRIOR TOTHE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBANCE OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.2. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE AT EACH POINT WHERE VEHICLES EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE PRIOR TOCOMMENCING ANY CLEARING/GRUBBING, REMOVAL, OR EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES. USE 2 INCHOR GREATER DIAMETER ROCK IN A LAYER AT LEAST 6 INCHES THICK ACROSS THE ENTIREWIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE. EXTEND THE ROCK ENTRANCE AT LEAST 50 FEET INTO THECONSTRUCTION ZONE USING A GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC BENEATH THE AGGREGATE TO PREVENTMIGRATION OF SOIL INTO THE ROCK FROM BELOW.3. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC ANDPRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS. AT A MINIMUM REMOVAL SHALL BE ONCE DAILY. SWEEPING SHALLBE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DONE IN A MANNERTO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CATCH BASIN INLETS WHICH RECEIVERUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN, REMOVE SEDIMENT, ORREPLACE STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ON A ROUTINE BASIS SUCH THAT THEDEVICES ARE FULLY FUNCTIONAL FOR THE NEXT RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT DEPOSITED INAND/OR PLUGGING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. HAYBALES OR FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED GRATES ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR INLET PROTECTION.5. LOCATE SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES NO LESS THAIN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATEROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL. IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABILIZETHE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING, VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS. CONTROLEROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES.6. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THECONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, ORROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY.7. TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS WHICH HAVEUNDERGONE FINAL GRADING, AND ALL AREAS IN WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDINGCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN,WIND AND RUNNING WATER. STABILIZATION TO BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AND BE COMPLETEDWITHIN 14 DAYS. USE SEED AND MULCH, EROSION CONTROL MATTIING, AND/OR SODDING ANDSTAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC, STRUCTURAL,NON-BIODEGRADABLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE SITE HASUNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT. FINALSTABILIZATION FOR PURPOSES OF THIS REMOVAL IS 70% ESTABLISHED COVER OVERDENUDED AREA.8. CHANGES TO APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERPRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION AND DETAILS FOR ALLPROPOSED ALTERNATE TYPE DEVICES.9. IF DEWATERING OR PUMPING OF WATER IS NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR OBTAINING ANY NECESSARY PERMITS AND/OR APPROVALS PRIOR TO DISCHARGE OF ANYWATER FROM THE SITE. IF THE DISCHARGE FROM THE DEWATERING OR PUMPING PROCESS ISTURBID OR CONTAINS SEDIMENT LADEN WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED THROUGH THE USE OFSEDIMENT TRAPS, VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS, OR OTHER SEDIMENT REDUCING MEASURESSUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE IS NOT VISIBLY DIFFERENT FROM THE RECEIVING WATER.ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE DISCHARGE POINT TOPREVENT SCOUR EROSION.10. INSTALL SEED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, MULCH, AND OTHER REVETMENT INACCORDANCE WITH DESIGN DRAWING SHEETS R-01 AND R-02.11. BOTH CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL KEEP A LOG OF ALL TREES GREATER THAN 6"DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEE SHEET R-02 FOR TREEREPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS.SITE ACCESS FROM HIGHVIEW DRIVE(SEE SHEET G-06)REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNREMOVALS AND TEMPORARYEROSION CONTROL PLAN23101014.04-C-03 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.SALVAGE EXISTING BENCH AND PLACE INTHE GRAVEL PARKING LOT ADJACENT TOBLUFF CREEK DR. PARK DISTRICT STAFFWILL HAUL BENCHES AWAY.SALVAGE AND STOCKPILEEXISTING RIPRAP FOR REUSEREMOVE EXISTINGCONCRETE HEADWALLSALVAGE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND GATES(APPROX. 2446 LF) AND PLACE IN THE GRAVELPARKING LOT ADJACENT TO BLUFF CREEK DR.PARK DISTRICT STAFF WILL HAUL AWAY.APPROXIMATE LANDSLIDE LIMITSAPPROXIMATE LANDSLIDE LIMITSREMOVE EXISTING WOODEN FENCEREMOVE EXPOSED PORTIONOF NORTH PIPE, SEE C-18REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTINGPIEZOMETERS PER ENGINEER'S DIRECTIONREMOVE EXISTING MODULARBLOCK RETAINING WALLREMOVE EXISTINGPIPE DEBRISFILL EXISTING NORTHPIPE WITH GROUT ANDABANDON IN PLACE,SEE C-18CLEARING LIMITSCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
DETAIL: SILT FENCE - MACHINE SLICED-1NOT TO SCALEDOWNSTREAM VIEWSECTION VIEW5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POSTAT 4 FT. MAX. SPACINGGEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" MIN.MACHINE SLICE 8" TO 12"DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP)GRADEPLASTIC ZIP TIES (MIN. 50 LBSTENSILE STRENGTH) ON TOP8" MIN. 3 PER POSTRUNOFF FLOW DIRECTIONMACHINE SLICE 8"-12"DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP)MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE PER MN/DOT STD.SPECIFICATION 3886, INSTALL PER MN/DOTSTD. SPEC. 2573NOTES:1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING WORK IN THE AREA TO BE PROTECTED AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. SILTFENCE AND ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINAL GRADING AND SITE STABILIZATION.2. SILT FENCE INSTALLATION AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS 2573 AND 3886.3. NO HOLES OR GAPS SHALL BE PRESENT IN/UNDER SILT FENCE. PREPARE AREA AS NEEDED TO SMOOTH SURFACE OR REMOVE DEBRIS.4. WHEN SEDIMENT BUILD UP REACHES 1/3 OF FENCE HEIGHT, THE SILT FENCE SHOULD BE REMOVED OR A SECOND SILT FENCE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF THE EXISTING FENCE AT ASUITABLE DISTANCE.5. WHEN SPLICES ARE NECESSARY MAKE SPLICE AT POST ACCORDING TO SPLICE DETAIL. PLACE THE END POST OF THE SECOND FENCE INSIDE THE END POST OF THE FIRST FENCE.ROTATE BOTH POSTS TOGETHER AT LEAST 180 DEGREES TO CREATE A TIGHT SEAL WITH THE FABRIC MATERIAL. CUT THE FABRIC NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE POSTS TOACCOMMODATE THE 6 INCH FLAP. THEN DRIVE BOTH POSTS AND BURY THE FLAP. COMPACT BACKFILL.NOT TO SCALE1
2
'
M
INDETAIL: STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITAS REQU
IRED-NOTES:1. MAINTAIN ENTRANCE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIODAND REPAIR OR REPLACE AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT TRACKINGOFFSITE.2. REMOVE ENTRANCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH FINAL GRADING AND SITESTABILIZATION.4EXPAND FOR TURNINGRADIUS AS REQUIRED6" MINIMUM1"-2" WASHED ROCKGEOTEXTILE FABRIC (OPTIONAL)2-DETAIL: INLET PROTECTION - SEDIMENT LOGNOT TO SCALENOTES:1. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING WORK IN THE AREA TO BEPROTECTED OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CATCHBASIN INSTALLATION, AND SHALL BEMAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.2. MATERIALS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FLOW WHILE BLOCKING SEDIMENT. NO HOLESOR GAPS SHALL BE PRESENT IN/UNDER SEDIMENT LOG.3. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE CLEANED AS REQUIRED.4. MATERIALS AND ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IN CONJUNCTION WITHTHE FINAL GRADING AND SITE STABILIZATION.STORM GRATESEDIMENT LOGCURBSTAKE ENDS (TYP)STAKE END (TYP)CURBSEDIMENT LOGCATCHBASINCURBSECTION VIEWPLAN VIEW42623A3BSLOPE INSTALLATIONNOTES:1.REFER TO MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STAPLE PATTERNS FOR SLOPE INSTALLATIONS.2.PREPARE SOIL BY LOOSENING TOP 1-2 INCHES AND APPLY SEED (AND FERTILIZER WHERE REQUIRED)PRIOR TO INSTALLING BLANKETS. GROUND SHOULD BE SMOOTH AND FREE OF DEBRIS.3.BEGIN (A) AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE AND ROLL THE BLANKETS DOWN OR (B) AT ONE END OF THESLOPE AND ROLL THE BLANKETS HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE.4.THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP, WITH THEUPHILL BLANKET ON TOP.5.WHEN BLANKETS MUST BE SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE, PLACE BLANKETS END OVER END (SHINGLESTYLE) WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY12" APART.6.BLANKET MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED OR AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER.5-DETAIL: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - INSTALLATIONNOT TO SCALEFLOWFLOWSEDIMENT LOGWOOD STAKESEDIMENT LOGWOOD STAKEDETAIL: EROSION LOG - STAKING-3NOT TO SCALESIDE VIEW FLATFRONT VIEWFLOWSEDIMENT LOGSIDE VIEW ON SLOPETOP VIEWWOOD STAKEOVERLAP ENDSNOTES:1. INSTALL SEDIMENT LOG ALONG CONTOURS (CONSTANT ELEVATION).2. NO GAPS SHALL BE PRESENT UNDER SEDIMENT LOG. PREPARE AREA AS NEEDED TOSMOOTH SURFACE OR REMOVE DEBRIS.3. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WHEN REACHING 1/3 OF LOG HEIGHT.4. MAINTAIN SEDIMENT LOG THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AND REPAIR ORREPLACED AS REQUIRED.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-04_EROSION CONTROL DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:02 PMrlg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_Drawing_D 4_Erosion Control Details.dwg Plot at 0 12/21/2015 16:08:36..TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM TEMPORARY SEEDING IN ADDITION TO TEMPORARY MULCHINGON GRADED/DISTURBED AREAS WHEN THE SITE IS TO BE LEFT IDLE FOR LONGER THAN 21 DAYS -IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 2575.3 B.1, USE COVERCROP AND MID-TERM STABILIZATION SEED MIXTURES AS SHOWN IN 3876, "SEED", TABLE 3876-1FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING2. PERFORM TEMPORARY MULCHING TO PROTECT THE SITE FROM EROSION WHEN LEFT IDLE FORMORE THAN ONE WEEK AND DURING NON-SEEDING PERIODS AND WHEN OUTSIDE THE SEEDINGAND SODDING DATES. FOR AREAS LESS THAN TWO ACRES, MULCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOTSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 2575.3.M, "RAPID STABILIZATION"REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRAAMINNEAPOLIS, MN.LANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLDETAILS23101014.04-C-04 D90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554351.0 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INFORMATION:THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) HAS BEEN PREPARED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA GENERALSTORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY NO. MNR100001 (GENERAL PERMIT), AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTAPOLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSALSYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PROGRAM.THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIESWILL TAKE PLACE ALONG AND JUST SOUTH OF THE MINNESOTA BLUFFS REGIONAL TRAIL BETWEEN FLYING CLOUD ROAD ANDLAKOTA LANE. THE APPROXIMATE CENTROID OF THE PROJECT HAS A LATITUDE OF 44.819492 AND A LONGITUDE OF -93.526089.THIS PROJECT INVOLVES EROSION CONTROL, REPAIR AND REGRADING OF LANDSLIDE DAMAGED SLOPES, REPAIR OF DAMAGEDCULVERTS, INSTALLATION OF STORM SEWER AND MANHOLES AND SITE RESTORATION . THE PROJECT AS PROPOSED HAS A TOTALDISTURBANCE AREA OF 7.22 ACRES. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED TO MINIMIZESEDIMENT FROM BEING TRANSPORTED INTO BLUFF CREEK, WHICH IS AN IMPAIRED WATER. REFER TO PROJECT DRAWINGS FORFURTHER DETAILS. (CSW PERMIT PART III.A.1)1.1 PROJECT SIZE AND CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:·THE ANTICIPATED AREA OF DISTURBANCE IS APPROXIMATELY 7.22 ACRES.·THE TOTAL AREA OF PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 0.70 ACRES.·THE TOTAL AREA OF POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 0.70 ACRES.·THE TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 0 ACRES.1.2 DATES OF CONSTRUCTION:·ANTICIPATED START DATE: TBDANTICIPATED END DATE: TBD1.3 CONTACT INFORMATION:OWNER: HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITYMAILING ADDRESS: 701 4TH AVE. S. #400CONTACT PERSON: JESSICA GALATZTITLE: PROJECT MANAGERPHONE NUMBER: (612) 348-2691EMAIL ADDRESS: JESSICA.GALATZ@HENNEPIN.USALTERNATE CONTACT PERSON: KRISTINE STEHLYTITLE: PROJECT ENGINEERPHONE NUMBER: (612) 348-6370EMAIL ADDRESS: KRISTINE.STEHLY@HENNEPIN.USOPERATOR / GENERAL CONTRACTOR (WILL OVERSEE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP): TBDMAILING ADDRESS:CONTACT PERSON: TITLE:PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS:PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG-TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITYMAILING ADDRESS: 701 4TH AVE. S. #400CONTACT PERSON: JESSICA GALATZTITLE: PROJECT MANAGERPHONE NUMBER: (612) 348-2691EMAIL ADDRESS: JESSICA.GALATZ@HENNEPIS.US2.0 RECEIVING WATERS:WATERS WITHIN ONE MILE (NEAREST STRAIGHT LINE DISTANCE) THAT ARE LIKELY TO RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THEPROJECT SITE (CSW PERMIT ITEM 5.10) INCLUDE:SPECIAL IMPAIRED PUBLIC WATER WITH WORKNAME OF WATER BODYTYPE (1)WATER BODY ID (2)WATER? (3)WATER? (3)IN WATER RESTRICTIONS?BLUFF CREEKCREEK07020012-710NOYES NORICE LAKELAKE27-0132-00NONO NO(1) TYPE EXAMPLES: DITCH, POND, WETLAND, CALCAREOUS FEN, LAKE, STREAM, RIVER(2) WATER BODY IDENTIFICATION (ID) MIGHT NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL WATER BODIES. USE THE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT: HTTPS://WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER-SPECIAL-AND-IMPAIRED-WATERS-SEARCH(3) REFER TO CSW PERMIT SECTION 23. IMPAIRED WATER FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS(NUTRIENT EUTROPHICATION BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS), TURBIDITY, TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS), DISSOLVED OXYGEN,OR AQUATIC BIOTA (FISH BIOASSESSMENT, AQUATIC PLANT BIOASSESSMENT, AND AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATE BIOASSESSMENT)2.1 SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS: THE MPCA'S SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL WAS USED TO LOCATE SPECIALAND IMPAIRED WATERS WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUS MEASUREMENT) OF THE PROJECT SITE.BLUFF CREEK HAS ANEPA-APPROVED IMPAIRMENT FOR TURBIDITY AND FISH BIOTA. THESE IMPAIRMENTS ARE CONSIDERED CONSTRUCTION RELATEDAND REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) OR PLAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERALPERMIT. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 2.7 AND SECTION 23)ADDITIONAL BMPS OR OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN AN APPROVEDTOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) INCLUDE IMMEDIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS AND CONSTRUCTION OF ATEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH 5 OR MORE ACRES . (CSWPERMIT ITEM 5.19)2.2 PUBLIC WATERS WITH WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS: THIS PROJECT DOES NOT INCLUDE WORK IN PUBLIC WATERS. (CSWPERMIT ITEM 5.11)2.3 WETLAND IMPACTS: THIS PROJECT DOES NOT INCLUDE WETLAND IMPACTS. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.4 AND 2.10, AND SECTION 22)2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS: STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES ARE NOT REQUIRED AS ARESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (E.G., EAW OR EIS), ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES REVIEW, ARCHEOLOGICALSITE REVIEW, OR OTHER LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL REVIEW CONDUCTED FOR THE PROJECT. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.8, 2.9, AND5.16)2.5 KARST AREAS OR DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS: THIS PROJECT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY KARST ORDRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 16.19, 16.20, AND 18.10)3.0 PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS:REQUIRED FEATURESHEET NUMBER·PROJECT LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITSG-01·EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARIES, DIRECTIONS C-06,C-14,C-16OF FLOW AND ALL DISCHARGE POINTS WHERE STORMWATER IS LEAVING THE SITE ORENTERING A SURFACE WATER·SOIL TYPES AT THE SITEC-05A·LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACESC-06,C-14,C-16·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT BE BE DISTURBED (E.G., BUFFER ZONES, WETLANDS, ETC.) C-06,C-14,C-16·LOCATIONS OF AREAS OF STEEP SLOPESC-06,C-14,C-16·LOCATIONS OF AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE PHASED TO MINIMIZE DURATION NAOF EXPOSED SOILS·PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO A PUBLIC WATER WITH DNR WORK IN WATER NARESTRICTIONS FOR FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMES·LOCATIONS OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL C-03,G-05,G-06BMPS AS REQUIRED IN PERMIT SECTIONS 8 THROUGH 10 AND 14 THROUGH 19·BUFFER ZONES AS REQUIRED IN PERMIT ITEMS 9.17 AND 23.11C-06,C-14,C-16·LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL POLLUTION-GENERATING ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN PERMIT C-06,C-14,C-16SECTION 12·STANDARD DETAILS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE INSTALLED C-04AT THE SITE4.0 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS):4.1 EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES:1. BEFORE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN, THE LIMITS OF THE AREAS TO BE DISTURBED DURINGCONSTRUCTION WILL BE DELINEATED WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.2. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION OF SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 8.4, 8.5, AND 23.9)a. AREAS OF EXPOSED SOIL WILL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, PRESERVATION OFMATURE VEGETATION, MULCH OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES.b. IF PRESENT, SOIL STOCKPILES WILL BE STABILIZED WITH MULCH (SUCH AS STRAW MULCH, EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETS OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES.c. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEANAGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THECONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS, AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPTFROM THESE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS.2. STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 8.6 THROUGH 8.8)a. IF SOILS WITHIN EXISTING STORMWATER DITCHES OR SWALES ARE DISTURBED, THEY WILL BESTABILIZED WITH CHANNEL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, RIPRAP, TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT OREQUIVALENT MEASURES.b. MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE, OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICESWILL NOT BE USED TO STABILIZE ANY PART OF AN EXISTING STORMWATER DITCH OR SWALE WITH ACONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.c. THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET OF LENGTH OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE,OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE SITE, WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, ORFROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER WILL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURSAFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE.d. STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES ORSWALES WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATEROR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY ORPERMANENTLY CEASED.3. ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS: ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS WILL BE PROVIDED WITHONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOW METHODS: RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES.(CSW PERMIT ITEM 8.9)4. EROSION PREVENTION IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINES: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.4, 8.4 THROUGH 8.6, AND 23.9)a. STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES) WILL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TOLIMIT SOIL EROSION WHENEVER ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILYCEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14CALENDAR DAYS.b. IF THE EXPOSED SOIL AREAS DRAIN TO A DISCHARGE POINT THAT IS WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUSMEASUREMENT) OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER (SEE SECTION 2.0), STABILIZATION OF EXPOSEDSOIL AREAS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES) WILL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSIONWHENEVER ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANYPORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 7 CALENDAR DAYS.c. THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES CAN BE TAKEN TO INITIATE STABILIZATION: PREPPING THE SOIL FORVEGETATIVE OR NON-VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION, APPLYING MULCH OR OTHER NON-VEGETATIVEPRODUCT TO THE EXPOSED SOIL AREA, OR SEEDING OR PLANTING THE EXPOSED AREA.5. ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES: THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTIONMETHODS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 8.2, 8.3, AND8.10)a. SOIL DISTURBANCE WILL BE MINIMIZED WHEREVER POSSIBLE TO AID IN EROSION PREVENTION.b. EXISTING VEGETATION WILL BE PRESERVED WHEREVER POSSIBLE TO LIMIT EXPOSED SOIL AND THUSWILL SERVE AS NATURAL VEGETATIVE BUFFERS.c.EXPOSED SOIL ON STEEP SLOPES (≤3H:1V) WILL BE STABILIZED USING EROSION CONTROL BLANKETSAND SEEDING.d. HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING WILL BE UTILIZED TO MINIMIZE EROSION POTENTIAL.e. TERRACING WILL BE USED TO MINIMIZED EROSION POTENTIAL.4.2 SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES:1. DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROLS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 9.2 THROUGH 9.6)a. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS ANDLOCATED UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WILL INCLUDE: SILTFENCE, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS / BIOROLLS (FILLED WITH COMPOST, WOOD CHIPS, ROCK, ETC.),VEGETATIVE BUFFERS (RETAIN EXISTING VEGETATION WHERE POSSIBLE), OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES.b. PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENTLAND‐DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PERMANENT COVER HAS BEENESTABLISHED.c. IF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATESHORT‐TERM ACTIVITIES (SUCH AS CLEARING, GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES), THE CONTROLSMUST BE RE-INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT‐TERM ACTIVITY HAS BEENCOMPLETED. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE RE-INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXTPRECIPITATION EVENT, EVEN IF THE SHORT‐TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE.d. IF THE DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED (BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OREXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT), INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TOIDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES.2. SOIL STOCKPILE PERIMETER CONTROLS: TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES WILL BE SURROUNDED BY: DOUBLEROWS OF SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES, AND SHALL NOT BE PLACEDIN ANY NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS.(CSW PERMIT ITEMS 9.9 AND 9.10)3. STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 9.7 AND 9.8)a. INLET PROTECTION BMPS WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS DOWNGRADIENT OFCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.b. STORM DRAIN INLETS WILL BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGINGTO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.c. INLET PROTECTION BMPS WILL BE: SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG, FILTER SACKS, OR EQUIVALENTMEASURES.4. VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 9.11 AND 9.12)a. VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS WILL BE INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OUT OF SEDIMENT FROMTHE CONSTRUCTION AREA AND WILL INCLUDE: ROCK PADS AND MUD MATS OR AN EQUIVALENTSYSTEM.b. IF SUCH VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKEDONTO THE PAVED ROAD, STREET SWEEPING WILL ALSO BE EMPLOYED. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVEDBY SWEEPING WITHIN 24 HOURS.5. PROTECTION OF INFILTRATION AREAS: IF NECESSARY, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSIONBERMS) WILL BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHENEXCAVATED PRIOR TO ESTABLISHING PERMANENT COVER WITHIN THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA.(CSW PERMIT ITEMS 16.4 AND 16.5)6. MINIMIZATION OF SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVATION OF TOPSOIL: SOIL COMPACTION WILL BEMINIMIZED AND TOPSOIL WILL BE PRESERVED WHERE POSSIBLE. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.24, 9.14, AND 9.15)7. PRIORITIZATION OF ONSITE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL: (CSW PERMIT ITEM 9.16)a. PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL WILL BE IMPLEMENTEDONSITE WHERE POSSIBLE.b. DISCHARGES FROM BMPS WILL BE DIRECTED TO VEGETATED AREAS OF THE SITE (INCLUDING ANYNATURAL BUFFERS) IN ORDER TO INCREASE SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND MAXIMIZE STORMWATERINFILTRATION. IF EROSION IS NOTED TO OCCUR AS THE RESULT OF SUCH A DISCHARGE, VELOCITYDISSIPATION BMPS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND INSTALLED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION.8. BUFFER ZONE OR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO PROTECT SURFACE WATERS: (CSW PERMIT ITEM9.17)a. A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER WILL BE PRESERVED IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS DISCHARGING TO ANON-SPECIAL/NON-IMPAIRED SURFACE WATER OR WETLAND. IF A NON-SPECIAL/NON-IMPAIREDSURFACE WATER OR WETLAND IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCESAND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER, OR WHEN A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, REDUNDANTSEDIMENT CONTROLS WILL BE PROVIDED.b. A 100-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER WILL BE PRESERVED IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS DISCHARGING TO ASPECIAL OR IMPAIRED SURFACE WATER. IF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED SURFACE WATER IS LOCATEDWITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THESURFACE WATER, OR WHEN A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS WILL BEPROVIDED.c. REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROLS WILL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BYLACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE.9. USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) IS NOTANTICIPATED AS PART OF THE PROJECT. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.22 AND 9.18)10. THE PROJECT WILL NOT INCLUDE 10 OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOIL DRAINING TO A COMMONLOCATION OR 5 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMONLOCATION WITHIN 1 MILE OR A SPECIAL ORIMPAIRED WATER THEREFORE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS ARE NOT REQUIRED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.6,9.13, AND 23.10 AND SECTION 14)4.3 DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING: NO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING WILL OCCUR AS PART OF THISPROJECT. (CSW PERMIT SECTION 10 AND ITEM 10.5)4.4 BMP DESIGN FACTORS: THE FOLLOWING BMP DESIGN FACTORS HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IN DESIGNING THETEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS:1. EXPECTED AMOUNT, FREQUENCY, INTENSITY, AND DURATION OF PRECIPITATION.2. NATURE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND RUN‐ON AT THE SITE, INCLUDING FACTORS SUCH AS EXPECTEDFLOW FROM IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, SLOPES, AND SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES.3. STORMWATER VOLUME, VELOCITY, AND PEAK FLOW RATES TO MINIMIZE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS INSTORMWATER AND TO MINIMIZE CHANNEL AND STREAMBANK EROSION AND SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATEVICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS.4. RANGE OF SOIL PARTICLE SIZES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT.(SEE PAGE 2 OF 2)CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-05_SWPPP.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:03 PMREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP)23101014.04-C-05 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554355.0 PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS REQUIRED IF THE PROJECT RESULTS IN ONE ACRE OR MOREOF NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR RESULTS IN A NET INCREASE OF ONE OR MORE ACRES OF CUMMULATIVE NEWIMPERVIOUS SURFACES IN TOTAL OR IF THE PROJECT IS PART OF A LARGER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. (CSW PERMITITEM 15.3)5.1 A PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM IS NOT REQUIRED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.15, 15.4-15.9, AND23.14)5.2 THIS IS NOT A LINEAR PROJECT WITH LACK OF RIGHT OR WAY. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 15.9)5.3 THIS PROJECT DOES NOT DISCHARGE TO A TROUT STREAM (OR A TRIBUTARY TO A TROUT STREAM). (CSW PERMITITEM 23.12)6.0 INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES:6.1 PERSONS WITH REQUIRED TRAINING: TRAINED INDIVIDUALS INCLUDE THOSE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FORINSTALLING, SUPERVISING, REPAIRING, INSPECTING, AND MAINTAINING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL BMPS AT THE SITE. TRAINED INDIVIDUALS ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPPAND COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETE, PERMANENTCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS5.20, 5.21, AND 11.9 AND SECTION 21)THESE INDIVIDUALS WILL BE TRAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT,INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE CONTENT AND EXTENT OF TRAINING WILL BE COMMENSURATE WITH THEINDIVIDUAL'S JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.BELOW IS A LIST OF PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS PROJECT WHO ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THEAPPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS.TRAINED INDIVIDUALRESPONSIBILITYTRAINING ENTITY* TRAINING DATEERIC FITZGERALD PREPARATION OF THE SWPPPUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 2017TBDOVERSIGHT OF SWPPP IMPLEMENTA- TBDTBDTION, REVISION, AND AMMENDMENTTBDPERFORMANCE OF SWPPP INSPECTIONS TBDTBDTBDPERFORMANCE OR SUPERVISION OF TBDTBDINSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, ANDREPAIR OF BMPS*TRAINING DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 6.2 FREQUENCY OF INSPECTIONS: A TRAINED PERSON WILL ROUTINELY INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE.(CSW PERMIT ITEMS 11.2, 11.10, AND 23.13)·AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION·WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURSINSPECTION FREQUENCY MAY BE ADJUSTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES:·WHERE PARTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREAS HAVE PERMANENT COVER, BUT WORK REMAINS ON OTHER PARTSOF THE SITE, INSPECTIONS OF THE AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH.·WHERE CONSTRUCTION AREAS HAVE PERMANENT COVER AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ONTHE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDEDCOMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES.·WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, THEINSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE MUST BEGINWITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER RUNOFF OCCURS AT THE SITE OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVERCOMES FIRST.6.3 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: EACH CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER SITE INSPECTION WILL INCLUDE INSPECTIONOF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 11.3 THROUGH 11.8)·ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENTMEASURES·SURFACE WATERS FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION·CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS FOR EVIDENCE OF OFFSITE SEDIMENT TRACKING·STREETS AND OTHER AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF SITE ACCUMULATIONS OFSEDIMENT6.4 MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: MAINTENANCE OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS AND BMPS WILL BE PERFORMED ASFOLLOWS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 11.3 THROUGH 11.8)·NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WILL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE ENDOF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS.·PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOMENONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.·TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS WILL BE DRAINED AND THE SEDIMENT REMOVED WHENTHE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.·DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS WILL BE REMOVED, AND THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENTREMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL WILL BE RE-STABILIZED. THE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WILL BECOMPLETED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, ORPHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. IF PRECLUDED DUE TO ACCESS CONSTRAINTS, REASONABLE EFFORTS TOOBTAIN ACCESS WILL BE USED. REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WILL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OFOBTAINING ACCESS.·TRACKED SEDIMENT ON PAVED SURFACES WILL BE REMOVED WITHIN 1 CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY.·AREAS UNDERGOING STABILIZATION WILL BE RESTABILIZED AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE REQUIRED COVER.6.5 RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 11.11 AND 24.5 AND SECTIONS 6 AND 20)1. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WILL BE RECORDED IN WRITING WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEINGCONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS WILL BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION ANDMAINTENANCE ACTIVITY WILL INCLUDE THE DATE AND TIME; NAME OF INSPECTOR(S); FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS;CORRECTIVE ACTIONS (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); ANDDATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOREACH EVENT.a. IF ANY DISCHARGE IS OBSERVED DURING THE INSPECTION, THE LOCATION AND APPEARANCE OF THEDISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUSINDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS) WILL BE DOCUMENTED AND A PHOTOGRAPH WILL BE TAKEN.2. THE SWPPP WILL BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS TO CORRECT PROBLEMS ORADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,WEATHER, OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TOSURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER.a. THE SWPPP WILL BE AMENDED WHEN INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER, OPERATOR,OR CONTRACTORS OR BY USEPA/MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE INELIMINATING OR MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER;THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES; OR THE SWPPP IS NOTCONSISTENT WITH A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.b. ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION WILL BE DOCUMENTED ASREQUIRED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS.c. AMENDMENTS WILL BE COMPLETED BY AN APPROPRIATELY TRAINED INDIVIDUAL. CHANGES INVOLVING THEUSE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP WILL INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMPIS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.3. RECORDS RETENTION: THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCERECORDS WILL BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONALCONTROL OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER A FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURINGNORMAL WORKING HOURS.4. RECORD AVAILABILITY: THE PERMITTEES WILL MAKE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING INSPECTION REPORTS,MAINTENANCE RECORDS, AND TRAINING RECORDS, AVAILABLE TO FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL OFFICIALSWITHIN THREE DAYS UPON REQUEST FOR THE DURATION OF THE PERMIT COVERAGE AND FOR THREE YEARSFOLLOWING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION.7.0 POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES:1. ANY CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACHPOLLUTANTS WILL BE STORED UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) TO PREVENTDISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS THROUGH MINIMIZATION OF CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. STORAGE OF SUCHMATERIALS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 12.2)2. PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE STORED UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTICSHEETING, TEMPORARY ROOFS, WITHIN A BUILDING, OR IN WEATHER-PROOF CONTAINERS) TO PREVENTDISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS THROUGH MINIMIZATION OF CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. STORAGE OF SUCHMATERIALS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 12.3)3. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE (E.G., OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINTSOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, ANDACIDS) WILL BE STORED AND DISPOSED OF IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES CHAPTER 7045, INCLUDINGSECONDARY CONTAINMENT (AS APPLICABLE). HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE PROPERLY STORED IN SEALEDCONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS, OR OTHER DISCHARGES AND PREVENT PRECIPITATION FROM FALLINGONTO THE CONTAINERS OR STORED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.3 AND 12.4)4. SOLID WASTE WILL BE COLLECTED, STORED, AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTARULES CHAPTER 7035. THIS INCLUDES STORAGE WITHIN COVERED TRASH CONTAINERS AND DAILY REMOVAL OFLITTER AND DEBRIS. STORAGE OF SOLID WASTE WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENTPOSSIBLE. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 12.5)5. PORTABLE TOILETS WILL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM SURFACE WATERS AND POSITIONED AND SECURED TO THEGROUND SO THEY WILL NOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. SANITARY WASTE WILL BE DISPOSED OF INACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 7041. PORTABLE TOILETS WILL BE PERIODICALLY EMPTIEDAND THE WASTE HAULED OFF-SITE BY A LICENSED HAULER. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 12.6)6. VEHICLE FUELING WILL ONLY OCCUR IN DESIGNATED AREAS. SPILL KITS SIZED APPROPRIATELY FOR THEAMOUNT OF REFUELING TAKING PLACE WILL BE LOCATED. SPILL KITS WILL BE CLEARLY LABELED AND CONTAINMATERIALS TO ASSIST IN SPILL CLEANUP INCLUDING ABSORBENT PADS, BOOMS FOR CONTAINING SPILLS, ANDHEAVY-DUTY PROTECTIVE GLOVES. SPILLS WILL BE REPORTED TO THE MINNESOTA DUTY OFFICER AS REQUIREDBY MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 115.061. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.3 AND 12.7)a. ANY FUEL TANKS BROUGHT ON-SITE WILL HAVE PROPERLY SIZED CONTAINMENT AND WILL NOT BE TOPPEDOFF TO AVOID SPILLS FROM OVERFILLING. FUEL TANKS WILL MEET INDUSTRY STANDARDS (DESIGNED TOHOLD FUEL TYPE, PROPERLY MAINTAINED, NOT ILLEGALLY MODIFIED, NOT MISSING LEAK INDICATORFLOATS FOR DOUBLE WALLED TANKS, SIGHT GAUGES NOT USED, ETC.) OR BE REMOVED FROM THE WORKAREA.b. GUIDELINES FOR SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE INCLUDE:- TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS,INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED,INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE;- PERFORM REGULAR PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE ON TANKS AND FUEL LINES;- INSPECT PUMPS, CYLINDERS, HOSES, VALVES, AND OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON-SITE FORDAMAGE OR DETERIORATION;- DO NOT WASH OR RINSE FUELING AREAS WITH WATER;- MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SUPPLIES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND PROVIDE ANAPPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS;- REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE; AND- MAINTAIN COPIES OF SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDSS) FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON-SITE INLOCATIONS READILY AVAILABLE TO EMERGENCY RESPONDERS.7. IF VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING IS NECESSARY, A VEHICLE WASH STATION WILL BE LOCATED IN ADESIGNATED AREA. RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA WILL BE CONTAINED IN A SEDIMENT BASIN AND WASTEFROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY WILL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. ANY SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS WILLBE PROPERLY USED AND STORED. ANY DETERGENTS AND OTHER CLEANERS NOT PERMITTED FOR DISCHARGEWILL NOT BE USED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.3 AND 12.8)8. THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN CONCRETE OR OTHER WASHOUT ACTIVITIES. IF NECESSARY, A DESCRIPTIONOF THE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUT WASTES SO THAT WASTES DO NOTCONTACT THE GROUND WILL BE ADDED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.3 AND 12.9)8.0 PERMANENT COVER AND PERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS:1. THE AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION WILL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT COVER UPONCOMPLETION OF WORK. PERMANENT COVER MAY BE VEGETATIVE OR NON-VEGETATIVE, AS APPROPRIATE.ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT COVER MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: SEEDING, MULCHING, ANDEROSION CONTROL BLANKETS. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 5.17)2.FOR A CONSTRUCTION-SITE TO ACHIEVE “PERMANENT COVER”, THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MUST BECOMPLETED PRIOR TO TERMINATION OF PERMIT COVERAGE: (CSW PERMIT SECTIONS 4 AND 13)a. ALL SOIL DISTURBING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND PERMANENT COVER HASBEEN INSTALLED OVER ALL AREAS. VEGETATIVE COVER CONSISTS OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIONWITH A DENSITY OF 70% OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THEFUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION (SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASEOF A SAND FILTER).b. ALL SEDIMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING CULVERTS.c. ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE MAY BE LEFT IN PLACE.WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE TERMINATION CONDITIONS ARE COMPLETE, A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) FORM WILLBE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-05_SWPPP.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:03 PMREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP)23101014.04-C-06 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.GOPHER STATE ONE CALL:CALL BEFORE YOU DIG.1-800-252-1166PROJECTLOCATIONPROJECT LOCATIONSCALE IN FEET20,00010,0000CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
ST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-5ST-4PZ-2SB-3SB-2SB-1ST-1SB-5SB-6SB-4ST-7ST-8ST-9750
7
5
0
760 76077077077078078078079079079080080080080080081081081081082082082082083083083083076015+33T0+00T1+00T2+00T3+00T4+00T5+00T6+00T7+00T8+00T9+00T10+00T11+00T12+00T13+00T14+00T15+00T82082
0
830
830818818818818822822
822822824824
824824826826826826
828828828828
832832832832
8348348368368388387607707807
9
0
8
0
0
8
1
0WTWTWTWTWTWTWTWT
WTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWT
WT L178158208258308358408458158208258308358408450+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+00 15+32100' VCPVC STA: 2+00.00PVC ELEV: 833.40PVT STA: 3+00.00PVT ELEV: 831.00
100' VCPVC STA: 10+70.00
PVC ELEV: 836.02
PVT STA: 11+70.00
PVT ELEV: 838.92100' VCPVC STA: 6+60.00
PVC ELEV: 818.00
PVT STA: 7+60.00
PVT ELEV: 820.50 100' VCPVC STA: 5+10.00
PVC ELEV: 820.50
PVT STA: 6+10.00
PVT ELEV: 818.00
0.00%0.20%-5.00%5.00%0.79%NEW FENCE,SEEEXISTING TRAILEXI
S
T
I
N
G
C
M
P
FINISHED TRAIL GRADEEXISTING GROUND1-PLAN: TRAIL MODIFICATIONSNSCALE IN FEET1005002-PROFILE: TRAIL MODIFICATIONSHORIZ. SCALE IN FEET100500100CONSERVATION EASEMENT5VERT. SCALE IN FEETEXISTING TRAILCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-07_TRAIL MODIFICATIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:30 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435PROPERTY LINE (TYP)CONSTRUCTION LIMITSSuite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL MODIFICATIONSPLAN AND PROFILE23101014.04-C-07 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.NEW STORM SEWER,SEE SHEET C-19EXISTING NORTH PIPENEW TRAIL,SEENORTH SLOPE REPAIR AREA,SEE SHEET C-17SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLETAND STREAMBANK REPAIR,SEE SHEET C-131C-102C-10NEW DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITH TRM,SEE SHEET C-193C-18CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
FG OFFSET2+007908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET2+507908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET3+007908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET3+507908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET4+007908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET4+507807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET5+007807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET5+507807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET6+007507607707807908008108208308407507607707807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET6+507407507607707807908008108208308407407507607707807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET7+007507607707807908008108208308407507607707807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500-10-20-30-40-50NOTE:SEE FOR FURTHER DETAILSON TRAIL SECTIONS, INCLUDING 2% CROSSSLOPE ON TRAIL SURFACE.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL MODIFICATIONSCROSS SECTIONS23101014.04-C-08 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-07_TRAIL MODIFICATIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:06 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435FINISHED GRADE (TYP.)EXISTING GROUND (TYP.)3:14:12:12:14%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%2:12:18:18:18:12C-101C-10CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
FG OFFSET7+507707807908008108208308407707807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 1200-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET8+007807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET8+507807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET9+007908008108208308408507908008108208308408500 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET9+508008108208308408508008108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET10+008008108208308408508008108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET10+508008108208308408508008108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET11+008108208308408508108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET11+508108208308408508108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET12+008108208308408508108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL MODIFICATIONSCROSS SECTIONS23101014.04-C-09 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-07_TRAIL MODIFICATIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:07 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435FINISHED GRADE (TYP.)EXISTING GROUND (TYP.)Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354%4%2:14%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%2:12:12:14%4%NOTE:SEE FOR FURTHER DETAILSON TRAIL SECTIONS, INCLUDING 2% CROSSSLOPE ON TRAIL SURFACE.2C-101C-10CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-10_TRAIL SECTIONS AND DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:09 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554351-SECTION: TRAIL MODIFICATION (TYPICAL) - STA. 5+00 TO 7+75NOT TO SCALE10' TRAIL5' MIN. SHOULDER5' MIN. SHOULDER4%6" THICK MnDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED2.0%2H:1V MAX.NORTH SIDE6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.)EXISTING GROUNDTYPE 5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC(AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION)REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL MODIFICATIONSTYPICAL SECTIONS23101014.04C-10 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.SOUTH SIDE4%2-SECTION: TRAIL MODIFICATION (TYPICAL) - STA. 1+75 TO 5+00 AND STA. 7+75 TO 12+00NOT TO SCALE10' TRAIL5' MIN. SHOULDERVARIES - 5' MIN. SHOULDER4%2.0%NORTH SIDE6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.)EXISTING GROUNDSOUTH SIDE4%3" THICK 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACINGCLASS SPECIAL(SEE TABLE 1 FOR GRADATION)PREPARE TOP 12" OF SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCEWITH MnDOT STANDARD 2112NOTES:TEST ROLL SUBGRADE PRIOR TO AGGREGATEBASE INSTALLATION IN CONFORMANCE WITHMnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 2111.NOTES:TEST ROLL SUBGRADE PRIOR TO AGGREGATEBASE INSTALLATION IN CONFORMANCE WITHMnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 2111.6" THICK MnDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHEDTYPE 5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC(AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION)3" THICK 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACINGCLASS SPECIAL(SEE TABLE 1 FOR GRADATION)3/8" MINUS GRADATION FORAGGREGATE SURFACING(CLASS SPECIAL)SIEVE SIZEPERCENT PASSING3/8"100#470-100#4020-50#20010-30TABLE 11.5'1.5'1.5'1.5'NOTES:1. 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACING SHALL BE100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE.2. 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACING MUSTCOME FROM KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS,INC. OF BURNSVILLE, MN., IN ORDER TO MATCHCOLOR OF EXISTING TRAIL.2.0%2.0%PREPARE TOP 12" OF SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCEWITH MnDOT STANDARD 2112CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
750750 750750760760 760760770770770770770770780780780780780780790790790790790790800800800800800800800800800800810810810810810810810810810810820820820820820820820820830830830830830830830830EXI
S
T
I
N
G
C
M
P5+00T6+00T7+00T8+00T7607607607607707707707707807807807807907907907908008008
0
0
8
0
0
8108108
1
0
8
1
0
820820820820CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-11_SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:33 PM
1-NSCALE IN FEET40200PLAN: SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSuite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRPLAN23101014.04-C-11 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.SOUTH CULVERT OUTLET MODIFICATIONS,SEE SHEET C-13PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITH FLEXIBLECONCRETE GEOGRID, SEE SHEET C-19PROPERTY LINE(TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITSREMOVE EXISTING DAMAGED HEADWALLAND SLIP LINE IN EXISTING CULVERTSEE SHEET C-13FLARED END SECTIONSEE SHEET C-13REALIGNED TRAILTURF REINFORCEMENT MAT(CATEGORY 2)SEECLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2LEGENDRIPRAPTURF REINFORCEMENT MATFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRIDR-041
750755760765770775780785790795800805810815820825830835840750755760765770775780785790795800805810815820825830835840750755760765770775780785790795800805810815820825830835840750755760765770775780785790795800805810815820825830835840CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-11_SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:10 PM
1-SCALE IN FEET40200SECTION: SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSuite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSECTIONS23101014.04-C-12 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CULVERTEXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADEEXISTING DAMAGED HEADWALLC NEW TRAILLC EXISTING TRAILL2-SCALE IN FEET40200SECTION: SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR2H:1V MAX.EXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADEC NEW TRAILLC EXISTING TRAILL0-10-2010 20 30 40 50 60 70 802H:1V MAX.90-30-40100 110 120 130 140 150 160CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
740740740740750750 750750760760760760770770770770780780780780790790800800810810820820830830EX.
C
M
P
A
7
5
0
75076077078079080081082
0
830
7707707807807907908008008108108208208308300+0
0
C
1+
0
0
C2+00C2+37CSTART RIPRAPN: 165126.53E: 562060.20END RIRRAPN: 165112.13E: 561995.35START RIPRAPN: 165070.99E: 561911.86END RIPRAPN: 165026.13E: 561885.99INSTALL RIPRAP STILLING BASIN(BOTTOM EL. 740.85)SEEREMOVE EXISTING DAMAGED HEADWALLSEEPROPERTY LINE(TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITSSLIP LINE EXISTING CULVERTWITH 95" x 67" CMP. INCLUDE 5'MIN. LENGTH INSIDE EXISTINGCULVERT AND 2' MIN. LENGTHOUTSIDE EXISTING CULVERT.SEEINSTALL 95" x 67" FLARED END SECTIONON SLIP-LINED ARCH PIPESEEEXISTING CHANNEL THALWEGPROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITHFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID,SEE SHEET C-19BOULDER CROSS VANESEEBOULDER CROSS VANESEECADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-13_SOUTH CULVERT PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/13/2019 8:41 AM1-SCALE IN FEET40200Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET ANDSTREAMBANK REPAIR PLAN23101014.04-C-13 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.NPLAN: SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET AND STREAMBANK REPAIR17.5'1C-141C-141C-14INSTALL SALVAGED MnDOT CLASS IV RIPRAPAT SLOPE TOE (24" MIN. DEPTH)SEEINSTALL SALVAGED MnDOT CLASS IVRIPRAP AT SLOPE TOE (24" MIN. DEPTH)SEE1C-16MINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAIL1C-162C-151C-151C-15C-142C-143C-144NOTES:1. START AND END COORDINATES FOR SALVAGED RIPRAP AT SLOPETOE DELINEATE EXTENTS ALONG LENGTH OF CHANNEL. VERIFY ALLLOCATIONS IN THE FIELD WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2. REMOVE DEBRIS IN CHANNEL AS NECESSARY FOR WORK. DEBRISREMOVAL INCIDENTAL TO SALVAGED RIPRAP INSTALLATION.3. MINOR GRADING MAY BE NECESSARY ON SLOPE ABOVE PLACEDSALVAGED RIPRAP. SLOPE SHALL TIE-IN WITH TOP OF RIPRAP.INCIDENTAL TO RIPRAP PLACEMENT.EXISTING STREAM EXTENTSCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
7407457507557607657407457507557607650+001+002+002+377357407507607357407507600102030400-10-20-30-407307407507607307407507600102030400-10-20-30-40CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-14_SOUTH CULVERT REPAIR DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:20 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..EXISTING 8' SPAN CMPAAPPROX. 25'APPROX. 5'Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET REPAIRPROFILE AND SECTIONS23101014.04-C-14 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.FURNISH AND INSTALL 95" x 67" CMP FOR SLIP LININGEXISTING CULVERT. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZEAND FIT IN THE FIELD AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING.SECTION: CMPA CULVERT SLIP LINE1-EXISTING GROUTEDANNULUS (ASSUMED)ORIGINAL CONCRETECULVERTEXISTING 4" SLOTTED PVCUNDERDRAINEXISTING SAND PACKEXISTING GROUTVERIFICATION PORTORIGINAL CONCRETECULVERTEXISTING GROUTINJECTION PORTEXISTING RIPRAPEXISTING GEOTEXTILEEXISTING TIMBER PILESEXISTING GROUTPLACED IN VOID(FEB., 2016)EXISTING GROUNDREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE HEADWALLFINISHED GRADE2H:1V MAX.FURNISH AND INSTALL95" x 67" GS PIPE APRON5' MIN.2' MIN.INSTALL 3/4"Ø ASTM F1554, GR36, OR A36 THREADED ROD (GALV.).6" MINIMUM EPOXY GROUT EMBED. (6) EA. ROW, EQUALLY SPACEDAROUND CIRCUMFERENCE. CUT ROD FLUSH WITH NUT.FILL ANNULUS WITH CLSM HIGH DENSITYGROUT PER MnDOT 2519.3.A.2INSTALL 24" OF COARSE FILTERAGGREGATE, MnDOT 3149.2.HTYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC87"-5.30%-1.00%PROFILE: CULVERT OUTLET AND STREAM CHANNEL4-HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET40200VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET20100FLARED END SECTION87"2' EXTENSIONEXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADEEL. 752.98EL. 743.85EL. 743.85EL. 740.8530'20'90' (STREAM WIDTH = 30')80' (STREAM WIDTH = 20')30" R270 RIPRAP3'SECTION: STREAM CHANNEL (30' BOTTOM WIDTH)2-SCALE IN FEET20100SECTION: STREAM CHANNEL (20' BOTTOM WIDTH)3-SCALE IN FEET20100EXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADE30'36" R470 RIPRAP30" R270 RIPRAPEXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADE3:13:13:13:112'12'20'12'12'2.5:18:18:18:14'4'12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDING12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDING36" R470 RIPRAP12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDING12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDINGBOULDER CROSS VANEBOULDER CROSS VANECCCC24"PLACE SALVAGED, CLASS III, OR CLASS IV RIPRAP BENEATHFLARED END SECTION AS NEEDED TO FACILITATE COARSEFILTER AGGREGATE PLACEMENT. THIS RIPRAP MATERIAL ANDPLACEMENT IS INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END SECTION.1'-0"2'-0"2'-0"CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
12'30' US VANE,20' DS VANE12'BOULDER ELEVATIONPOINTVARIES - 4' MINB3 GRANULAR BEDDINGOVERFLOW ELEVATION4'-6' AVERAGE DIAMETERFIELDSTONE BOULDERSA-SECTION: BOULDER CROSS VANENOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALEB-SECTION: BOULDER CROSS VANE 3H:1V3H:1VRIPRAP(36" R470 US VANE,30" R270 DS VANE)12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDINGEXISTING SUBGRADENOTES:1. CROSS VANE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY BEMODIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.2. FINAL BOULDER PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD.CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO ADJUST BOULDER ELEVATIONS AND ROTATION.3. THERE SHALL BE NO GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS. RIPRAP BEDDING SHALL BEPLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE BOULDERS TO PLUG SMALL GAPS (MAYREQUIRE HAND PLACEMENT).4. BOULDERS OF AN UNSUITABLE SHAPE MAY BE RE-LOCATED OR REJECTED.5. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON DISTURBED BANKS.FLOW1-DETAIL: BOULDER CROSS VANE NOT TO SCALE18"12"TOE OF BANKBOULDER ELEVATIONPOINTTOP OF BANK4'-6' AVERAGE DIAMETERFIELDSTONE BOULDERSE312" APPROX.E2E1E3E2RIPRAP(36" R470 US VANE,30" R270 DS VANE)10'10'℄ CHANNEL (THALWEG)A-FLOW30°APPROX 30°APPROX12'30' US VANE20' DS VANE12'-BRIPRAP ANDGRANULAR FILTERTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANK2-7% UPWARD SLOPEE1E24'-6' AVERAGE DIAMETERFIELDSTONE BOULDERS10'10'TOE OF BANKTOE OF BANK2-DETAIL: STILLING BASINNOT TO SCALEPLAN VIEWSECTION VIEW D9'10'9'30'D-1330'3'EXISTING GROUNDSECTION VIEW CC-TIE INTO EXISTINGSTREAM CHANNEL3:1
20'20'3:13:1
3:11%12'20'131%BOTTOM EL. 740.85EL. 743.85EL. 743.8530" R270 RIPRAP12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDING13133'BOTTOM EL. 740.8528'EXISTING GROUND30" R270 RIPRAP12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDINGFLOWFLOWCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-14_SOUTH CULVERT REPAIR DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:55 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET REPAIRSECTIONS AND DETAILS23101014.04-C-15 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.BOULDER ELEVATION POINTSELEV. E1 ELEV. E2 ELEV. E3US VANE754.30 750.30 754.30DS VANE747.80 743.80 747.80CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
3' MIN.2.5H
:1VEXCAVATED STREAM BED MATERIAL (COMPACT)8" THICK Mn/DOT GRANULAR FILTER24" THICK SALVAGED RIPRAP(MnDOT CLASS IV)TOPSOIL AND SEEDEXISTING SLOPEFILL WITH EXCAVATEDSTREAM BED MATERIALEXISTING STREAM BED2' MIN.1-DETAIL: RIPRAP TOE PROTECTIONNOT TO SCALEEXISTING TOE OF BANKCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-16_STREAMBANK REPAIR DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:56 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTREAMBANK REPAIRDETAIL23101014.04-C-16 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
780780790790800800810810 8108108
2
0
8
2
0 820820830830830830840840840840790790800800810810820820820820820820830830 830830830830840840840840820820830830840840850850860860850850
7907908008002+00N0+00N1+00N13+00T14+00T15+00T15+33T8128128148148168168188208227
8
0
7
9
0
8
0
0
810820PROPOSED STORM SEWERSEECADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-17_NORTH AREA GRADING.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:35 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..1-PLAN: NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRNMINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILSCALE IN FEET40200POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTEREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNNORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRPLAN23101014.04-C-17 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.PROPERTY LINEEXISTING WETLANDEXTENTSCONSERVATION EASEMENTBOUNDARYCONSTRUCTION LIMITSPROTECT EXISTING HEADWALLPROPERTY LINEPROTECT EXISTING FENCEFILL EXISTING 18" DIP WITH GROUTAND ABANDON IN PLACE,SEE C-181C-18INSTALL NEW CHAINLINK FENCESEECRUSHED VIRGIN CLASS III RIPRAP1C-193C-182C-18EXISTING I.E. 810.9(VERIFY IN FIELD PRIOR TODOWNSTREAM GRADING)FILL AREA TO EL. 810.9(COMMON EMBANKMENT)POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTECLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
7727757807857907958008058108158208258308358408457727757807857907958008058108158208258308358408450+000+200+400+600+801+001+201+401+601+802+00FINAL GRADECONCRETE FOOTING (TYP.)3-DETAIL: WIRE FENCE DESIGN VINYL COATED6'-0"3'-0"NOT TO SCALE6" TYP.2'-6"
3"10'-0" MAX.CENTER TO CENTER12"END POST/PULL POST1 2LINE POST 1 3TOP RAIL 1 4 7CHAIN LINK FABRIC 1 6BOTTOM RAIL 1 4 74'-6"
3"ALTERNATE LINEPOST ANCHORAGENOTES:1.100% BONDED VINYL COATED - "BLACK", GALVANIZED 6GAGE.2.TERMINAL POSTS 9' END, CORNER OF PULL POST - 3" O.D.BLACK PIPE.3.LINE POSTS 9' x 2-1/2" SS 40.4.TOP RAIL SHALL BE 1-5/8" SS 30.5.ALL FITTING, TIES, LOOP CAPS, AND COMPONENT PARTSSHALL BE VINYL COATED "BLACK".6.CHAIN LINK FABRIC SHALL BE 2" MESH WITH KNUCKLEDSELVAGE TOP AND BOTTOM.7.FABRIC SHALL BE TIED BELOW TOP RAIL EVERY 12".8.FENCE SHALL BE GROUNDED.9.FENCE ALIGNMENT SHALL BE OFFSET 4' FROM EDGE OFTRAIL.10.REVIEW FENCE ALIGNMENT/EXTENTS WITH ENGINEERPRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ENGINEER MAY ALTER FENCEALINGMENT/EXTENTS.78079080081078079080081001020300-10-20-30EXISTING GROUNDCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-18_NORTH AREA REPAIR DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 1:05 PMGGN M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_Drawing_N2-OPT2_NORTH AREA - STORM SEWER PLAN & PROFILE.dwg Plot at 0 04/06/2016 16:05:35.Xrefs in Drawing - M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_BASE_EXISTING-IMAGE.dwg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_BASE_EXISTING-Planimetric.dwg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_Base-Design-Planimetric.dwg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_BASE_Borings(Carver County Coord).dwg
1-PROFILE: NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSCALE IN FEET10020REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNNORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRPROFILE, SECTION, AND DETAIL23101014.04-C-18 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.ABANDON EXISTING 18" DIP INPLACE WITH FLOWABLE FILLGROUTPROTECT EXISTINGHEADWALL1.5:1
CRUSHED VIRGIN CLASS III RIPRAPEXISTINGPROPERTYLINECAP EXISTING 18" DIPPLUG WITH MANUFACTURED PLUG OR CAP SPECIFICALLYDESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED TO BE USED WITH TYPEOF PIPE (18" DIP) BEING ABANDONED OR BULKHEAD ENDWITH CEMENT GROUT PRIOR TO ABANDONING PIPE WITHFLOWABLE FILL.5'2-SECTION: NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR (STA. 0+43)SCALE IN FEET10020EXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADECRUSHED VIRGIN CLASS III RIPRAPNNNNNNNNNNNFINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADEEL. 810.9FILL AREA (COMMON EMBANKMENT)CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
9+15S0+00S1+00S2+00S3+00S4+00S5+00S6+00S7+00S8+00S9+00S820820818818822822812812812812814814814814816816816816750750 750750760760 770770780780790790800800800800810810820820820820830830830830800800
810810
820820
83
0
83
0
830830830830
840840
8108108208208308308408408508508608608
2
0
8
2
0 830830830830840840840840750750760760 770770 780780790790800800810810760760770770
7
8
0
7
8
0
7
9
0
7
9
0
8008008108108108108208208
1
0
8
1
0
8
0
8
8
0
8
812812812812ST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-1SB-5SB-6ST-7ST-8ST-97357407457507557607657707757807857907958008058108158208258308358408457357407457507557607657707757807857907958008058108158208258308358408450+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+158.49%17.00%PVI STA = -0+09.59PVI EL = 752.00PVI STA = 1+65.28PVI EL = 766.84
PVI STA = 3+42.73
PVI EL = 797.01
PVI STA = 4+72.41
PVI EL = 805.896.84%REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELPLAN AND PROFILE23101014.04-C-19 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-19_STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/13/2019 12:46 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435EXISTING CMPA
1-NSCALE IN FEET60300CONSTRUCTION LIMITSSOUTH SLOPE REPAIRSEE SHEET C-11MINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILCONSERVATION EASEMENTTRAIL MODIFICATIONSSEE SHEET C-07PLAN: STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELBEATRICE I.ZWIERSONIRREV. TRUSTPARCEL LINEEXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINE2-HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET60300PROFILE: STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELVERTICAL SCALE IN FEET30150EXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADEPROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNELSEE1C-2124" HDPE STORM SEWER -DIRECTIONAL DRILLED302 LF - 24" HDPE @ 1.57%(INSTALL USING DIRECTIONALDRILLING METHODS)24" CAS PIPE APRON(IE. 810.50)24" CAS PIPE APRON2.5:1RIPRAP STILLING BASINPROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITHFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRIDSEE1C-21ROCK CHECK (TYP.)SEE2C-20RIPRAP STILLING BASINSEE1C-2024" CAS PIPE APRON(IE. 805.75)ROCK CHECK (TYP.)SPACED APPROX.EVERY 50'FILL AREA TO 810.9FILL AREAEL. 810.900.61%NOTES:1. INSTALL 24" HDPE AND NEW CHANNEL PRIOR TO PLUGGINGEXISTING NORTH 18" UNDER TRAIL EMBANKMENT.2. ENSURE VEGETATION IS AT LEAST 70% ESTABLISHED IN NEWCHANNEL PRIOR TO ALLOWING FLOW.3. INTLALL SEED , BLANKET, AND MULCH ONCE PROJECTDISTURBANCE IS COMPLETE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHRESTORATION DESIGN/SPECIFICATIONS.24" CAS PIPE APRONSSSSSSSSSS SFINISHED GRADEPOTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTEST-3ST-6ST-7ST-8ST-9CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2ROCKCHECKSTATIONROCK CHECKTOP ELEV.10+27756.3020+82760.9731+39765.8041+96743.6352+52783.1563+09792.8473+62799.5584+13802.92
DIA.L41411-FLARED END SECTIONFLOWE 2'NOTES:PIPE SIZES LARGER THAN THOSE SHOWN REQUIRE ASPECIAL DESIGN.REQUIREMENTS FOR RIPRAP SIZE AND THICKNESS ANDFILTER BLANKET SHALL BE DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS.1.FOR PIPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 30", USE 1.5'.2.DIMENSION E IS GIVEN ON STANDARD PLATES 3100 AND3110.SECTION: RIPRAP OUTFALL-RIPRAP1'B-AMnDOT GRANULARFILTER MATERIAL1RIPRAPMnDOT GRANULARFILTER MATERIAL1'12'A--B--SECTION: RIPRAP OUTFALLNOT TO SCALEDETAIL: RIPRAP OUTFALLNOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALETABLE OF QUANTITIESRIPRAP AT PIPE OUTLETSCLASS IId50 = 6"CLASS IIId50 = 9"CLASS IVd50 = 12"DIA. OFROUNDPIPE (IN.)L(FT.)12" DEPTHRIPRAP(CU. YD.)6" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER(CU. YD.)18" DEPTHRIPRAP(CU. YD.)9" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER(CU. YD.)24" DEPTHRIPRAP(CU. YD.)12" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER(CU. YD.)24125.52.88.34.211.05.52'2'2MnDOT CLASS IV RANDOMRIPRAP AND MnDOTGRANULAR FILTERCLASS IV RIPRAP6'10'36"2:1
2
:
1 2:12:1CLASS IV RIPRAPFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID(FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)DETAIL: ROCK CHECKNOT TO SCALEA-SECTION: ROCK CHECK NOT TO SCALE6'12"B-SECTION: ROCK CHECK NOT TO SCALEFLOWFLOWCLASS IV RIPRAPB-24"OVERFLOWELEVATION5'-2A-FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID(FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)12"2'NOTES:1.CUT FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID AT EACH ROCK CHECKAS NECESSARY TO IMPROVE GEOGRID FLEXIBILITY ANDFORM TRENCH FOR ROCK CHECK.2.PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 3-FT. OVERLAP OF GEOGRID ATBREAK BELOW ROCK CHECK WITH UPSTREAM GEOGRIDLAYER PLACED ON TOP OF DOWNSTREAM GEOGRID.3.VERIFY INSTALLATION AND REQUIRED STAKING WITHMANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.PROVIDE MIN. 3-FT. OVERLAPAT BREAK BELOW ROCK CHECKCULVERT INVERTREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELSECTIONS AND DETAILS23101014.04-C-20 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-20_STORM SEWER DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/13/2019 9:00 AMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
10'4'2'4'2'2'SLOPE AND WIDTH VARY1-SECTION: DRAINAGE CHANNEL NOT TO SCALESEE DETAIL 2 FOR KEY6" MIN. TOPSOIL WITH SEED ANDCATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROLBLANKET. EXTEND EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET 10' MIN. FROMEDGE OF FLEXIBLE CONCRETEGEOGRID.FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRIDNOTES:1.ALL FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID TO BE FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL.2.FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID IS TO BE LAID IN A SHINGLED MANNER SO THE UPSTREAM ROW IS LAIDOVER THE TOP OF THE DOWNSTREAM ROW AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'SGUIDELINES.3.FOR GENERAL INSTALLATION INFORMATION SEE DETAIL 2.4.PLACE TOPSOIL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID AND GRADE TO BESMOOTH PER MANUFACTURER GUIDELINES.216" MIN. TOPSOIL AND SEED BELOWFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRIDCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-20_STORM SEWER DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 3:27 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELSECTIONS AND DETAILS23101014.04-C-21 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.DETAIL: FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID INSTALLATION (FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)NOT TO SCALE-2CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
750750750750760760 760760770770 770770780780780780780780 780780790790790790790790800800800800800800800800810810810810810810
8108108
2
0
8
2
0
82
0
82
0 820820820820820820820820830830830830830830
830830830830830830 830830840840840840CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_R-01_RESTORATION PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 3:21 PM CONSTRUCTION LIMITSMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAIL1-PLAN: SEEDING NSCALE IN FEET120600WOODLAND EDGE SOUTH SEED MIX(MnDOT 36-211)SYMBOL AND PATTERN LEGEND580578CONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING 10' CONTOUREXISTING 2' CONTOURRESTORATION NOTES:1. ALL GROUND DISTURBANCE GENERATED FROM GRADING ACTIVITIESSHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12", STABILIZED ANDRESTORED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SEED WITH COVERCROP, AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR STRAW MULCH. THETOPSOIL USED FOR RESTORATION MAY BE STOCKPILED FROM GRADINGAREAS.2. SEED ANY DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WITHTHE SPECIFIED SEED MIX.3. ANY EXOTIC INVASIVE PLANTS AND WEEDS WITHIN THE SEEDING AREASSHALL BE SPRAYED WITH HERBICIDE 14 DAYS PRIOR TO SEEDING.SIGNAGE INDICATING THE USE OF HERBICIDES MUST BE POSTED ON SITE.4. ALL HERBICIDE APPLICATION SHALL BE APPLIED BY A LICENSEDAPPLICATOR WITHIN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5. SEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. SEEDING IS TO TAKEPLACE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINAL GRADING AND SOIL PLACEMENTTO PREVENT EROSION AND COMPACTION.6. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. IN THE CASEOF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THIS DETAIL, PLANS, ORSPECIFICATIONS, THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSEEDING PLAN23101014.04-R-01 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.NATIVE CONSTRUCTION SEED MIX(MnDOT 32-241)REALIGNED GRAVEL TRAILSTORMWATER SOUTH SEED MIX(MnDOT 33-261)WET PRAIRIE SEED MIX(MnDOT 34-262)RIPRAPPROPOSED TRAILCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2CLEARING LIMITS
750750750750760760 760760770770 770770780780780780780780780780780780 7807807
9
0
7
9
0 7907907907907907907907907907908
0
0
8
0
0 8008008008008008008008008
0
0
8
0
0
8
1
0
8
1
0 8108108108108108108108108108108208208208208208208
2
0
8
2
0 8208208208208208208208208308308308308308308308308308308
3
0
8
3
0 83083084084084084084084084
0
84
0
840840
8508508
5
0
8
5
0
850850860860
86086086
0
86
0
870870
870870870870
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_R-02_PLANTING PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 1:46 PM CONSTRUCTION LIMITSMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAIL1-PLAN: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MULCH PLAN NRIPRAPSYMBOL AND PATTERN LEGEND580578CONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING 10' CONTOUREXISTING 2' CONTOURREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNEROSION CONTROL BLANKET ANDMULCH PLAN23101014.04-R-02 A..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.REALIGNED GRAVEL TRAILSCALE IN FEET120600CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION12/13/19----------------------------------A B C 0 1 2 3FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID(FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(MnDOT CAT. 3N)DISK ANCHORED MULCHCLEARING LIMITSCLEARING LIMITS
750750750750760760 760760770770 770770780780780780780780780780780780 7807807
9
0
7
9
0 7907907907907907907907907907908
0
0
8
0
0 8008008008008008008008008
0
0
8
0
0
8
1
0
8
1
0 8108108108108108108108108108108208208208208208208
2
0
8
2
0 8208208208208208208208208308308308308308308308308308308
3
0
8
3
0 83083084084084084084084084
0
84
0
840840
8508508
5
0
8
5
0
850850860860
86086086
0
86
0
870870
870870870870
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_R-02_PLANTING PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 1:52 PM CONSTRUCTION LIMITSMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAIL1-PLAN: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AND TREE PLANTING PLAN NRIPRAPSYMBOL AND PATTERN LEGEND580578CONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING 10' CONTOUREXISTING 2' CONTOURNOTES:1. ALL TREES GREATER THAN 6" DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT REMOVED DURINGCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED AT A 1:1 RATIO.2. ESTIMATED TREE REPLACEMENT QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED IN THE TREEPLANTING SCHEDULE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES.3. ACTUAL TREE REPLACEMENT QUANTITY WILL VARY FROM THE PLANTINGSCHEDULE BASED ON NUMBER AND SPECIES OF TREES REMOVED DURINGCONSTRUCTION.4. BOTH CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL KEEP A LOG OF ALL TREES GREATERTHAN 6" DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION TODETERMINE TREES TO BE PLANTED.5. APPROXIMATE AREAS FOR TREE PLANTING ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN VIEW. FIELDSTAKE LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED TREES IN THE FIELD FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLANTING.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTREE PLANTING PLAN23101014.04-R-03 A..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.REALIGNED GRAVEL TRAILSCALE IN FEET120600CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION12/13/19----------------------------------A B C 0 1 2 3Common NameBotanic NameSizeSpacing (ft)Replacement% of TotalRemovedQuantity(Estimated)IronwoodOstrya virginiana #10 Cont. 10 O.C.4%TBDDowny ServiceberryAmelanchier arborea#10 Cont. 10 O.C.3%TBDAmerican LindenTilia americana#10 Cont. 15 O.C.8%TBDNorthern Pin OakQuercus ellipsoidalis#10 Cont. 15 O.C.3%TBDSugar MapleAcer saccharum#10 Cont. 15 O.C.50%TBDRed OakQuercus rubra#10 Cont. 15 O.C.3%TBDHackberryCeltis occidentalis#10 Cont. 10 O.C.10%TBDNorthern Strain RedbudCercis canadensis#10 Cont. 15 O.C.2%TBDSwamp White OakQuercus bicolor#10 Cont. 15 O.C.3%TBDBlack CherryPrunus serotina#10 Cont. 10 O.C.4%TBDCottonwoodPopulus deltoides#10 Cont. 15 O.C.10%TBDTotalTBD2-TABLE: ESTIMATED TREE PLANTING SCHEDULETREE PLANTING NOTES:1. REMOVE DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES.RETAIN THE NATURAL FORM OF PLANT. DO NOTCUT THE LEADER2. IF ROOT FLARE IS NOT EXPOSED WITHIN THECONTAINER EXCAVATE SURFACE SOIL TO BASEOF ROOT FLARE.3. DIG PLANT HOLES 6" MIN. LARGER THAN ROOTMASS, ALL SIDES.4. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIORTO PLANTING5. SET TREE ON LIGHTLY FIRMED BACKFILL SOILSO ROOT FLARE IS EVEN WITH FINISH GRADE.6. BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL AND FIRM SOILAROUND ROOT MASS TO MAINTAIN PLUMB ANDENSURE NO AIR GAPS AROUND ROOT MASS.7. CONSTRUCT 3" WATERING BASIN. THOROUGHLYWATER WITHIN 3 HOURS OF INSTALLATION.8. PLACE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (MN/DOTSPEC 3882.2 TYPE 6 - WEED SEED FREESHREDDED HARDWOOD.) TO A RADIUS OF 24"AND TO A DEPTH OF 3" AROUND TREE (SOILPREPARED AS PER PLAN).9. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH BASE OFPLANT.10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD.11. CONTRACTOR TO WATER AS NECESSARYTHROUGHOUT GUARANTEE PERIOD TOMAINTAIN IN A HEALTHY CONDITION. AT THEEND OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD ALL TREESTHAT ARE DEAD OR DETERMINED UNHEALTHYOR UNSIGHTLY SHALL BE REPLACED ATCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.DETAIL: TREE PLANTING3-NOT TO SCALETREE PER SCHEDULE3" SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH(INCIDENTAL TO TREEINSTALLATION)BACKFILL SOILEXISTING SUBGRADEFINISH GRADETYP.ROOT FLARE, TO BE AT GRADEAND NOT COVERED WITH MULCHOR SOULPRUNE AND REMOVEADVANTAGEOUS AND FIBROUSROOTS ABOVE ROOT FLARE24" MIN.FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID(FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)TREE PLANTING AREACLEARING LIMITSCLEARING LIMITS
12"12"CHECK SLOT NOTES:1. SECURE AT 12 IN. INTERVALS, BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL.2. CHECK SLOTS TO BE PLACE EVERY 25' ALONG FLOW LINE.WATER FLOWANCHOR TRENCH NOTES:1. SECURE AT 12 IN. INTERVALS, BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL.2. FOR SLOPES, CONSTRUCT TOP ANCHOR TRENCH 2 FT. BEYOND CREST OFSLOPE.30" MIN.12"12"INTERMITTENT CHECK SLOTTOP ANCHOR TRENCHTRM ANCHOR PATTERNWATER FLOW2 FT.2 FT.
4 FT.ANCHOR NOTES:1. PLACE ANCHORS ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE PATTERN.2. OVERLAP BETWEEN ROLLS IS 6 IN. MINIMUM.3. SPLICE BETWEEN ROLLS IS 18 IN. MINIMUM4. ALWAYS INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF PINS SPACED 12" APART AT ALL ROLLSPLICES.5. INSTALL PINS DOWN THE CENTER OF EACH MAT STAGGERING THE OUTSIDEPINS.6. ANCHORS SHALL BE AT MINIMUM 12 IN. STEEL NAILS WITH 1-1/2 IN.WASHERS OR 12 IN. U-SHAPED WIRE STAPLES. LONGER ANCHORS MAY BEREQUIRED FOR LOOSE SOILS. ANCHORS MUST PROVIDE SUFFICIENTGROUND PENETRATION TO RESIST PULLOUT.ANCHORS (TYP)TRM INSTALLATION NOTES:1. PLACE A MINIMUM OF 4 IN. OF TOPSOIL ON SLOPE.2. PLACE APPROXIMATELY 50% OF THE SPECIFIED SEED AND RAKE SEED INTO SOIL PRIORTO PLACEMENT OF TRM.3. INSTALL AND ANCHOR TRM AS SHOWN AND AS SPECIFIED.4. PLACE ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL (PULVERIZED, DRY, LOOSE) OVER TRM ROUGHLY 1 IN. THICKOR UNTIL THE TRM IS BARELY VISIBLE.5. APPLY REMAINING 50% OF SEEDING ON TOP OF SOIL FILLED TRM AND LIGHTLY RAKE INTOSOIL USING THE FLAT SIDE OF A RAKE.6. HYDROMULCH MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE APPROACH IN STEP 5.TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT(TRM)TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT(TRM)ANCHORANCHORS (TYP)NOT TO SCALEDETAIL: TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT-1NOTE:1. SECURE AT 12 IN. INTERVALS, BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOILEDGE TERMINATION ANCHOR TRENCHWATER FLOW12"12"ANCHORS (TYP.)TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM)REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNRESTORATION DETAILS23101014.04-R-04 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_R-04_RESTORATION DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 1:46 PMrlg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_Drawing_D 4_Erosion Control Details.dwg Plot at 0 12/21/2015 16:08:36..CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 1 of 15
Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources
in Minnesota
This joint application form is the accepted means for initiating review of proposals that may affect a water resource (wetland,
tributary, lake, etc.) in the State of Minnesota under state and federal regulatory programs. Applicants for Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to
the DNR. Applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form
(see the paragraph on MPARS at the end of the joint application form instructions for additional information). This form is only
applicable to the water resource aspects of proposed projects under state and federal regulatory programs; other local
applications and approvals may be required. Depending on the nature of the project and the location and type of water resources
impacted, multiple authorizations may be required as different regulatory programs have different types of jurisdiction over
different types of resources.
Regulatory Review Structure
Federal
The St. Paul District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the federal agency that regulates discharges of dredged or fill
material into waters of the United States (wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and
regulates work in navigable waters under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Applications are assigned to Corps project
managers who are responsible for implementing the Corps regulatory program within a particular geographic area.
State
There are three state regulatory programs that regulate activities affecting water resources. The Wetland Conservation Act
(WCA) regulates most activities affecting wetlands. It is administered by local government units (LGUs) which can be counties,
townships, cities, watershed districts, watershed management organizations or state agencies (on state-owned land). The
Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources issues permits for work in specially-designated public waters via the
Public Waters Work Permit Program (DNR Public Waters Permits). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) under Section
401 of the Clean Water Act certifies that discharges of dredged or fill material authorized by a federal permit or license comply
with state water quality standards. One or more of these regulatory programs may be applicable to any one project.
Required Information
Prior to submitting an application, applicants are strongly encouraged to seek input from the Corps Project Manager and LGU staff
to identify regulatory issues and required application materials for their proposed project. Project proponents can request a pre-
application consultation with the Corps and LGU to discuss their proposed project by providing the information required in
Sections 1 through 5 of this joint application form to facilitate a meaningful discussion about their project. Many LGUs provide a
venue (such as regularly scheduled technical evaluation panel meetings) for potential applicants to discuss their projects with
multiple agencies prior to submitting an application. Contact information is provided below.
The following bullets outline the information generally required for several common types of determinations/authorizations.
• For delineation approvals and/or jurisdictional determinations, submit Parts 1, 2 and 5, and Attachment A.
• For activities involving CWA/WCA exemptions, WCA no-loss determinations, and activities not requiring mitigation,
submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachment B.
• For activities requiring compensatory mitigation/replacement plan, submit Parts 1 thru 5, and Attachments C and D.
• For local road authority activities that qualify for the state’s local road wetland replacement program, submit Parts 1
through 5, and Attachments C, D (if applicable), and E to both the Corps and the LGU.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 2 of 15
Submission Instructions
Send the completed joint application form and all required attachments to:
U.S Army Corps of Engineers. Applications may be sent directly to the appropriate Corps Office. For a current listing of areas of
responsibilities and contact information, visit the St. Paul District’s website at:
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx and select “Minnesota” from the contact Information box.
Alternatively, applications may be sent directly to the St. Paul District Headquarters and the Corps will forward them to the
appropriate field office.
Section 401 Water Quality Certification: Applicants do not need to submit the joint application form to the MPCA unless
specifically requested. The MPCA will request a copy of the completed joint application form directly from an applicant when they
determine an individual 401 water quality certification is required for a proposed project.
Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit. If necessary, contact your
county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or visit the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) web site
(www.bwsr.state.mn.us) to determine the appropriate LGU.
DNR Public Waters Permitting: In 2014 the DNR will begin using the Minnesota DNR Permitting and Reporting System (MPARS) for
submission of Public Waters permit applications (https://webapps11.dnr.state.mn.us/mpars/public/authentication/login).
Applicants for Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. To
avoid duplication and to streamline the application process among the various resource agencies, applicants can use the
information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form. The MPARS print/save function
will provide the applicant with a copy of the Public Waters permit application which, at a minimum, will satisfy Parts one and two
of this joint application. For certain types of activities, the MPARS application may also provide all of the necessary information
required under Parts three and four of the joint application. However, it is the responsibility of the Applicant to make sure that
the joint application contains all of the required information, including identification of all aquatic resources impacted by the
project (see Part four of the joint application). After confirming that the MPARS application contains all of the required
information in Parts one and two the Applicant may attach a copy to the joint application and fill in any missing information in the
remainder of the joint application.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 15
Project Name and/or Number:
PART ONE: Applicant Information
If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the
applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent’s
contact information must also be provided.
Applicant/Landowner Name: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCCRA), Jessica
Galatz
Mailing Address: 701 4th Avenue S, Suite 400, Minneapolis MN 55415
Phone: 612-348-2691
E-mail Address: Jessica.galatz@hennepin.us
Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Sarah Johnson
Mailing Address: 325 S Lake Avenue, Suite 700, Duluth MN, 55802
Phone: 218-529-7159
E-mail Address: sjohnson@barr.com
Agent Name: Tyler Conley
Mailing Address: 4300 MarketPointe Dr, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435
Phone: 952-832-2600
E-mail Address: tconley@barr.com
PART TWO: Site Location Information
County: Carver County City/Township: Chanhassen
Parcel ID and/or Address: 25990600, 252640080, 257560510, 250360200, and 250360700
Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Sections 25, 36, Township 116 West, Range 23 N and Section 30,
Township 116 West, Range 22 North
Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 44.821518/-93.525386
Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Refer to Figure 1.
Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 9.3 acres
If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the
names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to
your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at:
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf
PART THREE: General Project/Site Information
If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other
correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number.
This application is related to the Chanhassen Slope Failure project number 2015-04215-MMJ. A wetland
delineation was previously conducted in August 2015. This wetland delineation report was approved on December
18, 2015 (Appendix A). A second wetland delineation was completed on September 2019, for the expanded
project area. This wetland delineation has been reviewed by the technical evaluation panel and the approval letter
is attached.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 15
Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The
project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements
that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings
showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts.
Project Description:
The scope of the project includes landslide repairs on a portion of the Minnesota Bluffs LRT Regional Trail (trail) in
Chanhassen, MN owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA). Two areas will be repaired
as part of this project – the north repair area and the south repair area. Project access will be from Highview Drive
in Eden Prairie, proceeding southwest along the trail to the site, and also from Flying Cloud Drive through the
Moon Valley Aggregate operated property (final access route through Moon Valley Aggregate operated property
pending property owner authorization).
Landslide repairs in the south repair area will include stabilizing the south slope, repairing the south culvert outlet
area and constructing a new storm sewer and drainage ditch to direct water into the repaired area. Existing trail
profile grades will be reduced with the embankment slopes regraded to less steep grades and finished with turf
reinforcement mats. The existing damaged concrete headwall will be removed and existing riprap will be salvaged
for reuse. The south culvert outlet area will be repaired with riprap, boulder cross vanes, and a stilling basin.
Work in the north area will include removal of existing pipe debris, placement of riprap fill on north slope, and
abandonment of the existing pipe crossing beneath the trail. Drainage will be rerouted from north pipe area via
new buried storm sewer and lined drainage channel, which will discharge to the south culvert outlet area.Please
refer to Appendix B for the complete set of design plans and layout of the aforementioned project featrues.
Project Purpose and need
In 2014, a large rain event (presidential declared disaster 41823) caused the slopes supporting the trail to fail. The
trail has since been closed due to slope instability and public safety concerns. The purpose of the proposed project
is to stabilize the trail slopes, reopen the trail, and thereby reconnect a six-year closure of a Tier 1 Alignment of the
Regional Bicycle Transportation Network.
Aquatic Resources
Two wetland delineations were conducted within the project area. The first delineation was completed in August
2015.
The Second wetland delineation was completed in September 2019 to accommodate the proposed construction
limits in their entirety. The wetland delineations identified two wetland areas (0.49 acres) and one unnamed
stream channel within the project area (Figure 2).
The two wetland areas (Wetland 1, wetland 2) are incidental wetlands located within the ditch of the trail. Both
wetlands contained of three communities; shallow marsh, shrub-carr, and wet meadow. The shallow marsh
segment of the wetland is located on the northern end of the proposed access route. As the wetland extends
southwest, the slopes gradually increase causing the plant community to change from a shallow marsh to shrub-
carr and wet meadow. Using the Cowardin classification method the wetland areas were classified as palustrine
emergent wetlands that are partially seasonally flooded and temporarily flooded and ditched (PEMAd/PEMCd).
The unnamed stream was originally delineated as part of the 2015 wetland delineation report. The stream channel
was classified as a type 1 (RUBA) seasonally flooded sparsely vegetated stream channel.
Work conducted in Aquatic Resources
The proposed repairs will require work to be conducted within the two delineated wetlands and unnamed stream.
A constructed 10-foot wide access road is required along the existing trail to provide access for construction
materials and equipment. Portions of the trail corridor are too narrow and require placement of temporary fill in
the existing ditches (wetlands 1 and 2) to create the required 10-foot wide access route. Approximately 0.06 acres
of temporary fill will be placed within wetlands 1 and 2 (Appendix B, Pg G-05). Once construction is completed, the
fill will be removed and the ditches will be returned to as close to the pre-project existing conditions as possible.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 15
The proposed repair work requires 0.025 acres (86 cubic yards) of riprap be placed within approximately 79 linear
feet of the existing stream channel. This portion of stream has been previously impacted due to installing riprap for
an emergency repair in 2016.
An additonal, 0.092 acres (64 cubic yards) of riprap will be placed below the ordinary high water level downstream
from the emergency repair area. The placement of this riprap will impact approximately 294 linear feet of stream
channel and help further protect the stream banks and prevent further bank erosion and sedimentation
downstream (Appendix B, pg C-13).
Schedule
Tree clearing would be completed in the spring of 2020. Construction is anticipated to begin in the summer/fall of
2020 and commence by the end of 2020.
Special considerations
Threatened and Endangered Species
A threatened and endangered species assessment was completed for the proposed project. The review identified
two federally listed species and five state listed species occurring within one-mile of the project area (Appendix
C).
Rare natural Communities
No records of rare natural communities are shown in the NHIS database within the project area.
Special Fish and Wildlife Resources
The project is expected to improve fish and wildlife habitat along the unnamed stream channel. The stream is an
intermittent stream and does not support fish populations. Stabilization of the adjacent slope and stream bank will
help improve downstream water quality by reducing the amount of sediment loading into the stream channel. The
project will not block or impede potential fish passage.
Cultural Resources
In 2015, a review of records at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (MSHPO) was requested to identify
any previously recorded archaeological, historical, or architectural resources within the project area. Per the
Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structures Inventory for the project area, no archaeological sites
were identified and one historic feature was identified within Section 25, T116N, R23W (Appendix D). This
property will not be affected by the proposed project.
In November 2019, a second record search was submitted to MSHPO for the expanded project area. No additional
cultural resources were identified.
Groundwater sensitivity
The project will not directly impact groundwater since excavations will occur up to 10 feet below the ground
surface.
Sensitive Surface Waters
The MDNR Pubilc Waters Inventory (PWI) did not identify any basins or watercourses within the Project area. No
sensitive surface waters such as impaired waterbodies or trout waters were identified within the project area.
Tree Removal
It is anticipated the proposed project will require tree removal around the north and south repair area. Large trees
will be avoided to the degree practical. Tree clearing will be conducted between November 1 and March 31 to limit
impacts to sensitive wildlife species. All trees removed with >6” dbh will be replaced in accordance with the City of
Chanhassen’s permit requirements (Appendix B, R-02).
Status of Other Approvals
Table 1 below includes the status of other approvals required by the project.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 6 of 15
Table 1, Status of Other Regulatory Agency Submittals
Unit of Government Permit or Approval Status
City of Chanhassen Interim Use Permit To be Submitted in December,
2019
Wetland Delineation boundary and
type confirmation submitted
11/6/2019
Approved, see attached letter
City of Eden Prairie Application for Utility Right of Way
permit
To be submitted in spring 2020
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 7 of 15
Project Name and/or Number:
PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary
If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each
impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map,
aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts.
Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table.
Aquatic Resource
ID (as noted on
overhead view)
Aquatic
Resource Type
(wetland, lake,
tributary etc.)
Type of Impact
(fill, excavate,
drain, or
remove
vegetation)
Duration of
Impact
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)1
Size of Impact2
Overall Size of
Aquatic
Resource 3
Existing Plant
Community
Type(s) in
Impact Area4
County, Major
Watershed #,
and Bank
Service Area #
of Impact Area5
Stream 1 Tributary Fill
(Maintenance)
P 77ft (0.025
acres)
N/A None Carver County
Watershed #33
BSA #7
Stream 1 Tributary Fill (bank
stabilization)
P 296ft (0.092
acres)
N/A None Carver County
Watershed #33
BSA #7
1,2 Wetland Fill T (90) 0.06 acres N/A None Carver County
Watershed #33
BSA #7
1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the “T”. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that
would be removed after 220 days would be entered “T (220)”.
2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the
nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact
along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6
feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet).
3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter “N/A”.
4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2.
5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7.
If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated
with each:
1 The term “impact” as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify
activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to
indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 9 of 15
Project Name and/or Number:
Attachment A
Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or
Jurisdictional Determination
By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District
(Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply):
Wetland Type Confirmation
Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU
concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation
concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address
the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area
(including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.).
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication
from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of
computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all
waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be
appealed.
Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that
jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the
affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process.
In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for
Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013).
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 10 of 15
Project Name and/or Number:
Attachment B
Supporting Information for Applications Involving Exemptions, No Loss
Determinations, and Activities Not Requiring Mitigation
Complete this part if you maintain that the identified aquatic resource impacts in Part Four do not require wetland
replacement/compensatory mitigation OR if you are seeking verification that the proposed water resource impacts are either
exempt from replacement or are not under CWA/WCA jurisdiction.
Identify the specific exemption or no-loss provision for which you believe your project or site qualifies:
WCA: 8420.0105 Subp. 2. D.
USACE: Nationwide Permit 13: Bank stabilization and Nationwide Permit 3: Maintenance
Provide a detailed explanation of how your project or site qualifies for the above. Be specific and provide and refer to attachments
and exhibits that support your contention. Applicants should refer to rules (e.g. WCA rules), guidance documents (e.g. BWSR
guidance, Corps guidance letters/public notices), and permit conditions (e.g. Corps General Permit conditions) to determine the
necessary information to support the application. Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact the WCA LGU and Corps Project
Manager prior to submitting an application if they are unsure of what type of information to provide:
WCA
Under 8420.0105 Subp. 2. D WCA does not regulate impacts to incidental wetlands. The two delineated wetlands that
would be temporarily impacted by the proposed project are manmade ditched wetlands. These ditches are meant to
convey water away from the trail. However, due to the lack of slope, water has ponded in the trail area creating a narrow
wetland within an upland area. The project will place approximately 0.06 acres of fill within the incidental wetland area.
This fill will be temporary and removed upon completion of the project. The ditches will then be restored to as close to the
pre-project existing conditions as possible.
USACE:
It is anticipated that work within Waters of the U.S. can be completed under Nationwide Permit 3 and/or Nationwide
Permit 13.
Maintenance Activities:
The proposed project would need to repair 0.025 acres (86 cubic yards) of riprap within approximately 79 linear feet of the
existing stream channel. Some riprap was originally placed in this segment of the stream channel as part of a previous
emergency repair needed to stabilize the south culvert outlet. Since then the riprap has been displaced during subsequent
flood and runoff events. The proposed project would salvage existing riprap and also install additional riprap to further
protect the area from future erosion.
Bank Stabilization Activities:
Bank stabilization activities necessary for erosion control or prevention, such as vegetative stabilization, bioengineering,
spills, riprap, revetment, gabion baskets, stream barbs, and bulkheads, or combination of bank stabilization techniques.
In order to stabilize the bank of the unnamed stream, 0.092 acres (64 cubic yards) of riprap will be placed below the
ordinary high water level. The placement of riprap will impact approximately 294 linear feet of stream channel.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 11 of 15
Project Name and/or Number:
Attachment C
Avoidance and Minimization
Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a
description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management,
and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings,
roads, etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management
plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary:
Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist.
Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives
that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or
not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged
to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis:
Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest
extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water
resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4):
Off-Site Alternatives. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal
will require an individual permit (standard permit or letter of permission) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you may be
required to provide an off-site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must
be provided during the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final
decision. Applicants with questions about when an off-site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project
Manager.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 12 of 15
Project Name and/or Number:
Attachment D
Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation
Complete this part if your application involves wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation not associated with the local road
wetland replacement program. Applicants should consult Corps mitigation guidelines and WCA rules for requirements.
Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation via Wetland Banking. Complete this section if you are proposing to use credits from an
existing wetland bank (with an account number in the State wetland banking system) for all or part of your
replacement/compensatory mitigation requirements.
Wetland Bank
Account # County Major
Watershed #
Bank
Service
Area #
Credit Type
(if applicable) Number of Credits
Applicants should attach documentation indicating that they have contacted the wetland bank account owner and reached at
least a tentative agreement to utilize the identified credits for the project. This documentation could be a signed purchase
agreement, signed application for withdrawal of credits or some other correspondence indicating an agreement between the
applicant and the bank owner. However, applicants are advised not to enter into a binding agreement to purchase credits until the
mitigation plan is approved by the Corps and LGU.
Project-Specific Replacement/Permittee Responsible Mitigation. Complete this section if you are proposing to pursue actions
(restoration, creation, preservation, etc.) to generate wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation credits for this proposed
project.
WCA Action Eligible
for Credit1
Corps Mitigation
Compensation
Technique2
Acres Credit %
Requested
Credits
Anticipated3 County Major
Watershed #
Bank
Service
Area #
1Refer to the name and subpart number in MN Rule 8420.0526.
2Refer to the technique listed in St. Paul District Policy for Wetland Compensatory Mitigation in Minnesota.
3If WCA and Corps crediting differs, then enter both numbers and distinguish which is Corps and which is WCA.
Explain how each proposed action or technique will be completed (e.g. wetland hydrology will be restored by breaking the tile……)
and how the proposal meets the crediting criteria associated with it. Applicants should refer to the Corps mitigation policy
language, WCA rule language, and all associated Corps and WCA guidance related to the action or technique:
Attach a site location map, soils map, recent aerial photograph, and any other maps to show the location and other relevant
features of each wetland replacement/mitigation site. Discuss in detail existing vegetation, existing landscape features, land use
(on and surrounding the site), existing soils, drainage systems (if present), and water sources and movement. Include a
topographic map showing key features related to hydrology and water flow (inlets, outlets, ditches, pumps, etc.):
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 13 of 15
Project Name and/or Number:
Attach a map of the existing aquatic resources, associated delineation report, and any documentation of regulatory review or
approval. Discuss as necessary:
For actions involving construction activities, attach construction plans and specifications with all relevant details. Discuss and
provide documentation of a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the site to define existing conditions, predict project outcomes,
identify specific project performance standards and avoid adverse offsite impacts. Plans and specifications should be prepared by
a licensed engineer following standard engineering practices. Discuss anticipated construction sequence and timing:
For projects involving vegetation restoration, provide a vegetation establishment plan that includes information on site
preparation, seed mixes and plant materials, seeding/planting plan (attach seeding/planting zone map), planting/seeding
methods, vegetation maintenance, and an anticipated schedule of activities:
For projects involving construction or vegetation restoration, identify and discuss goals and specific outcomes that can be
determined for credit allocation. Provide a proposed credit allocation table tied to outcomes:
Provide a five-year monitoring plan to address project outcomes and credit allocation:
Discuss and provide evidence of ownership or rights to conduct wetland replacement/mitigation on each site:
Quantify all proposed wetland credits and compare to wetland impacts to identify a proposed wetland replacement ratio. Discuss
how this replacement ratio is consistent with Corps and WCA requirements:
By signature below, the applicant attests to the following (only required if application involves project-specific/permittee
responsible replacement):
• All proposed replacement wetlands were not:
• Previously restored or created under a prior approved replacement plan or permit
• Drained or filled under an exemption during the previous 10 years
• Restored with financial assistance from public conservation programs
• Restored using private funds, other than landowner funds, unless the funds are paid back with interest to the individual
or organization that funded the restoration and the individual or organization notifies the local government unit in
writing that the restored wetland may be considered for replacement.
• The wetland will be replaced before or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland.
• An irrevocable bank letter of credit, performance bond, or other acceptable security will be provided to guarantee successful
completion of the wetland replacement.
• Within 30 days of either receiving approval of this application or beginning work on the project, I will record the Declaration of
Restrictions and Covenants on the deed for the property on which the replacement wetland(s) will be located and submit proof
of such recording to the LGU and the Corps.
Applicant or Representative: Title:
Signature: Date:
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 14 of 15
Project Name and/or Number:
Attachment E
Local Road Replacement Program Qualification
Complete this part if you are a local road authority (county highway department, city transportation department, etc.) seeking
verification that your project (or a portion of your project) qualifies for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement
Program (LGRWRP). If portions of your project are not eligible for the LGRWRP, then Attachment D should be completed and
attached to your application.
Discuss how your project is a repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement of a currently serviceable road to meet
state/federal design or safety standards/requirements. Applicants should identify the specific road deficiencies and how the
project will rectify them. Attach supporting documents and information as applicable:
Provide a map, plan, and/or aerial photograph accurately depicting wetland boundaries within the project area. Attach associated
delineation/determination report or otherwise explain the method(s) used to identify and delineate wetlands. Also attach and
discuss any type of review or approval of wetland boundaries or other aspects of the project by a member or members of the local
Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) or Corps of Engineers:
In the table below, identify only the wetland impacts from Part 4 that the road authority has determined should qualify for the
LGRWRP.
Wetland Impact ID
(as noted on
overhead view)
Type of Impact
(fill, excavate,
drain)
Size of Impact
(square feet or
acres to 0.01)
Existing Plant Community
Type(s) in Impact Area1
County, Major Watershed #,
and Bank Service Area # of
Impact2
1Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2.
2Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7.
Discuss the feasibility of providing onsite compensatory mitigation/replacement for important site-specific wetland functions:
Please note that under the MN Wetland Conservation Act, projects with less than 10,000 square feet of wetland impact are
allowed to commence prior to submission of this notification so long as the notification is submitted within 30 days of the impact.
The Clean Water Act has no such provision and requires that permits be obtained prior to any regulated discharges into water of
the United States. To avoid potential unauthorized activities, road authorities must, at a minimum, provide a complete application
to the Corps and receive a permit prior to commencing work.
By signature below, the road authority attests that they have followed the process in MN Rules 8420.0544 and have determined
that the wetland impacts identified in Part 4 are eligible for the MN Local Government Road Wetland Replacement Program.
Road Authority Representative: Title:
Signature: Date:
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 15 of 15
Technical Evaluation Panel Concurrence: Project Name and/or Number:
TEP member: Representing:
Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
TEP member: Representing:
Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
TEP member: Representing:
Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
TEP member: Representing:
Concur with road authority’s determination of qualification for the local road wetland replacement program? Yes No
Signature: _________________________________________ Date:
Upon approval and signature by the TEP, application must be sent to: Wetland Bank Administration
Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources
520 Lafayette Road North
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Figures
MN River Bluffs LRTCrest
w
o
o
d
T
e
r
Voge Farm TrSettlement DrPioneer CirVogal Farm TrL
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
C
i
r
Settlers Ct Overland TrSierra TrHighview DrPineview Ct
Trails End RdHighview DrPathfinder Dr
Farmsted CirPioneer Tr
Eastwood Ct
Farmsted CirSet
t
lemen
t
D
r
Explorer Tr
Lakota La Lakeland TerMeadowlark LaFox Hollow DrFox Hollow DrDeerbroo
k
Dr
Flying Clou
d
Dr
456714
45671
456761
HennepinHennepinCountyCountyCarverCarverCountyCounty
TWP 116W
RNG 23N
SEC 25
TWP 116WRNG 23N
SEC 36
TWP 116W
RNG 22N
SEC 30
TWP 116WRNG 22N
SEC 31
SITE LOCATION
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 1
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-09-30 13:27 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig01 Site Location.mxd User: MRQ0 700
Feet
!;NMinnesota Bluff Rivers
LRT Regional Trail
Construction Limits
County Boundary
Public Land Survey Section Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
!>!>
Highvie
w
Dr Lakeland TerPioneer Tr
Trails End Rd456714
45671
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
SP 1-2SP 1-1
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 2
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQ!>Wetland Sample Location
Construction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Wetland Classifications
Type 3
Type 6
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
!>!>TrailsEndRdWetland 1
Wetland 2
SP 2-2
SP 2-1
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 2
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQ!>Wetland Sample Location
Construction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Wetland Classifications
Type 6
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
TrailsEndRdWetland 1
Wetland 2
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 2
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
2015 Delineated Wetlands
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Wetland Classifications
Type 1
Type 6
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
Wetland 1
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 2
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
2015 Delineated Wetlands
Approximate Stream Channel
Culvert Pipe
Delineated Wetlands
Wetland Classifications
Type 1
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 2
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
2015 Delineated Wetlands
Approximate Stream Channel
Culvert Pipe
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
APPENDIX A
MN Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 11
Project Name and/or Number: HCRRA Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail Slope Stabilization
PART ONE: Applicant Information
If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the
applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent’s
contact information must also be provided.
Applicant/Landowner Name: Jessica Galatz, Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
Mailing Address: 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400
Phone: 612‐348‐2691
E‐mail Address: jessica.galatz@hennepin.us
Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above):
Mailing Address:
Phone:
E‐mail Address:
Agent Name: Joel Swenson, Barr Engineering
Mailing Address: 4700 West 77th St, Minneapolis, MN 55435
Phone: 952‐832‐2799
E‐mail Address: jswenson@barr.com
PART TWO: Site Location Information
County: Carver City/Township:Chanhassen
Parcel ID and/or Address:
Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): S36, T116N, R23W
Lat/Long (decimal degrees): ‐93.527 44.819
Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways.
Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet):8.13 acres
If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the
names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to
your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at:
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf
PART THREE: General Project/Site Information
If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other
correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number.
Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The
project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements
that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings
showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts.
Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11
Project Name and/or Number: HCRRA Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail Slope Stabilization
Attachment A
Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or
Jurisdictional Determination
By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District
(Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply):
Wetland Type Confirmation
Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU
concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation
concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address
the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area
(including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.).
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non‐binding written indication
from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of
computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all
waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be
appealed.
Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that
jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the
affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process.
In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for
Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013).
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx
BWSR NOD Form – November 5, 2019 1
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
Notice of Decision
Local Government Unit: City of Chanhassen County: Carver
Applicant Name: Jessica Galatz, Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority
Applicant Representative: Sarah Johnson, Barr Engineering
Project Name: HCRRA Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail Slope Stabilization Delineation Update
LGU Project No. (if any):
Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 10/30/2019
Date of LGU Decision: 12/5/2019
Date this Notice was Sent: 12/9/2019
WCA Decision Type - check all that apply
☒Wetland Boundary/Type ☐Sequencing ☐Replacement Plan ☐Bank Plan (not credit purchase)
☐No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐Exemption (8420.0420)
Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9
Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only)
Total WCA Wetland Impact Area:
Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits:
☐ Bank Credits:
Bank Account Number(s):
Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any)
☐ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☒ No TEP Recommendation
LGU Decision
☐ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☒ Approved1 ☐ Denied
List Conditions:
Decision-Maker for this Application: ☒ Staff ☐ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other:
Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify):
1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project-
specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on
the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be vali d.
LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1.
☒ Attachment(s) (specify): Wetland Delineation Figure
☒ Summary: The LGU reviewed the site in the field on October 29, 2019. No comments were received from
the TEP and the LGU concurred with the boundary and type observed in the field.
1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations.
Attached Project Documents
BWSR NOD Form – November 5, 2019 2
☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify):
Appeals of LGU Decisions
If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you
received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director
along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified
below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail.
The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their
representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why
the decision is in error. Send to:
Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator
Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources
520 Lafayette Road North
St. Paul, MN 55155
travis.germundson@state.mn.us
Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision?
☒ Yes1 ☐ No
1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process.
Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable)
Send petition and $50.00 to 7700 Market Boulevard, PO Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Notice Distribution (include name)
Required on all notices:
☒ SWCD TEP Member: Aaron Finke ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Ben Carlson
☒ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Todd Gerhardt, City of Chanhassen, Andi Moffatt, WSB
☒ DNR Representative: Leslie Parris, Jennie Skancke
☒ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Linda Loomis, Lower MN River Watershed District
☒ Applicant (notice only): Jessica Galatz, Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority ☒ Agent/Consultant
(notice only): Sarah Johnson, Barr Engineering; Tyler Conley, Barr Engineering
Optional or As Applicable:
☒ Corps of Engineers: Mariah Weitzenkamp
☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only):
☒ Members of the Public (notice only): Leslie Stovring, Eden Prairie LGU; Erik Henricksen, City of Chanhassen;
Terry Jeffery, RPBCWD ☐ Other:
MN River Bluffs LRTCres
t
w
o
o
d
T
e
r
Voge Farm TrSettlement DrPioneer CirVogal Farm TrL
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
C
i
r
Settlers Ct Overland TrSierra TrHighview DrPineview Ct
Trails End RdHighview DrPathfinder Dr
Farmsted CirPioneer Tr
Eastwood Ct
Farmsted CirSet
t
lemen
t
D
r
Explorer Tr
Lakota La Lakeland TerMeadowlark LaFox Hollow DrFox Hollow DrDeerbrook
Dr
Flying Clou
d
Dr
45671
456714
456761
HennepinHennepinCountyCountyCarverCarverCountyCounty
TWP 116W
RNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116W
RNG 23N
SEC 23
TWP 116W
RNG 22N
SEC 22
TWP 116W
RNG 22N
SEC 22
SITE LOCATION
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 1
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-09-30 13:27 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig01 Site Location.mxd User: MRQ0 700
Feet
!;NMinnesota Bluff Rivers
LRT Regional Trail
Construction Limits
County Boundary
Public Land Survey Section Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
!>!>
!>!>
Highvie
w
Dr Lakeland TerPioneer Tr
Trails End Rd456714
45671
Wetland 2
Wetland 1
SP 1-2SP 1-1
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 6
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQ!>Wetland Sample Location
Construction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Wetland Classifications
Type 3
Type 6
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
!>!>
!>!>TrailsEndRdWetland 2
Wetland 1
SP 2-2
SP 2-1
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 6
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQ!>Wetland Sample Location
Construction Limits
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Wetland Classifications
Type 6
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
!>!>!>!>TrailsEndRdWetland 2
Wetland 1
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 6
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
2015 Delineated Wetlands
Approximate Stream Channel
Delineated Wetlands
Wetland Classifications
Type 1
Type 6
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
!>!>!>!>
Wetland 2
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 6
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
2015 Delineated Wetlands
Approximate Stream Channel
Culvert Pipe
Delineated Wetlands
Wetland Classifications
Type 1
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
!>!>!>!>
WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
Minnesota River Bluffs LRTRegional Trail Slope Stabilization
Chanhassen, Minnesota
FIGURE 6
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.7.1, 2019-10-02 10:37 File: I:\Projects\23\10\1014\Maps\Wetland_Delineation_Report_Oct2019\Fig06 Wetland Delineation Map.mxd User: MRQConstruction Limits
2015 Delineated Wetlands
Approximate Stream Channel
Culvert Pipe
Imagery Source; NearMap, April 2019
0 100
Feet
!;N
APPENDIX B
Plan Set
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-01_TITLE SHEET AND INDEX.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:18 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTITLE SHEET, PROJECT LOCATION, ANDSHEET INDEX23101014.04-G-01 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSPROJECT LOCATIONCARVER COUNTYCHANHASSEN, MN.NORTH REPAIR AREASOUTH REPAIR AREANORTH AREA ACCESS FROMHIGHVIEW DRIVEANTICIPATED RIGHT OF ENTRYFROM FLYING CLOUD DRIVE TOBOTTOM OF SLOPE OF SOUTHREPAIR AREAGENERAL NOTES:1. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN IN THIS PLAN SET IS A COMBINATION OFDATA FROM: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY BARR ENGINEERING CO. IN JANUARY 2015,SURVEY CONDUCTED BY STONEBROOKE IN JANUARY 2019 AND MnDNR 2011 LiDARTOPOGRAPHY.2. IMAGERY; COPYRIGHT PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP AND HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA, 2015.3. HORIZONTAL DATUM AND COORDINATE SYSTEM: CARVER COUNTY COORDINATES,NAD83 HARN, US SURVEY FEET.4. VERTICAL DATUM: NGVD29.MOON VALLEYAGGREGATERICE LAKEGOPHER STATE ONE CALL:CALL BEFORE YOU DIG.1-800-252-1166FLYING
CLOUD
DR
IVE DEERBROOK DR
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
I
L
TRA
I
L
S
E
N
D
R
D
.LAKOTA LNPIONEER
TRA
ILGREAT PLAINS BLVDHWY 1011-PLAN: PROJECT LOCATIONN05001000SCALE IN FEETMINNESOTA
B
L
U
F
F
S
L
R
T
. . . . TITLE SHEET, PROJECT LOCATION, AND SHEET INDEXG-01G-02. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS - PLANC-06. . . . TRAIL MODIFICATIONS - PLAN AND PROFILEC-02C-01. . . . STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)C-03C-07C-08C-13C-05C-04G-03. . . . REMOVALS AND TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLANENGINEER CONTACT:Matt PetersonBarr Engineering Co.4300 MarketPointe Dr.Minneapolis, MN 55435952-832-2949mpeterson@barr.comOWNER'S REPRESENTATIVECONTACT:Jessica GalatzHennepin County Regional Railroad Authority701 Fourth Ave. S., Suite 400Minneapolis, MN 55415612-348-2691Jessica.Galatz@hennepin.usCONTACTS:. . . . SEEDING PLANR-01C-14C-09C-10C-11C-12. . . . RESTORATION DETAILSR-03G-04. . . . SITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL - OVERALL PLAN AND NOTESG-05G-06. . . . TRAIL CLOSURE SIGNAGE EAST OF LAKE RILEY. . . . STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES. . . . SITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL - PLANS. . . . SITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROL - PLAN AND DETAILS. . . . TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DETAILS. . . . TRAIL MODIFICATIONS - CROSS SECTIONS. . . . TRAIL MODIFICATIONS - CROSS SECTIONS. . . . TRAIL MODIFICATIONS - TYPICAL SECTIONS. . . . EXISTING CONDITIONS - PHOTOS . . . . SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR - PLAN. . . . SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR - SECTIONS. . . . STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNEL - PLAN AND PROFILE. . . . STREAMBANK REPAIR - DETAIL. . . . NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR - PLAN. . . . NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR - PROFILE, SECTION, AND DETAILC-15C-16C-17C-18C-19. . . . SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET AND STREAMBANK REPAIR - PLAN. . . . SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET REPAIR - PROFILE AND SECTIONSG-07. . . . LEGEND, NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND ALIGNMENT CONTROL DATA. . . . STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)C-20. . . . SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET REPAIR - SECTIONS AND DETAILSC-21. . . . STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNEL - SECTIONS AND DETAILS. . . . STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNEL - SECTIONS AND DETAILSR-02 . . . . EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AND MULCH PLANR-04. . . . TREE PLANTING PLAN. . . . PROJECT LAYOUT PLANG-08RI
L
E
Y
L
A
K
E
R
D
.LAKE RILEYINSTALL TRAIL CLOSURE SIGNAGEEAST OF LAKE RILEYSEE SHEET G-07
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-01_TITLE SHEET AND INDEX.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 9:48 AMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNLEGEND, NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND ALIGNMENT CONTROL DATA23101014.04-G-02 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.ABBREVIATIONSLEGENDCB CATCH BASINC.I.P. CAST-IN-PLACECLSM CONTROLLED LOW STRENGTH MATERIALSCMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPECONC. CONCRETEEL. ELEVATIONFES FLARED END SECTIONI.E. INVERT ELEVATIONMH MANHOLEMnDOT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONNWL NORMAL WATER LEVELRCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPETRM TURF REINFORCEMENT MATCMPA CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ARCH1DETAIL: GRAPHICS STANDARDSDETAIL VIEW CALL OUTSCALE: 1=1SECTION VIEW CALL OUTSECTION VIEW TITLESECTION: GRAPHICS STANDARDS10SCALE: 1=1111101010GENERAL NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TOWORK.2. ALL EXISTING ROADS, PARKING LOTS, TRAILS, SIGNS, OR SIMILAR SHALL NOT BEDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SURVEYSWITH THE ENGINEER TO DOCUMENT PRE-CONSTRUCTION EXISTING CONDITION ISSUES.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TOCOMMENCEMENT OF GRADING FOR EACH LOCATION DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSIONCONTROL PLANS ARE PROVIDED INSIDE THE PROJECT STORMWATER POLLUTIONPREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP).4. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE FINAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TOBE COORDINATED WITH THE OWNER AND STAKED IN THE FIELD.5. CLEARING AND GRUBBING TO BE PERFORMED ONLY WITHIN GRADING LIMITS ANDACCESS ROUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY ENGINEER.6. TREES TO BE CLEARED WILL BE MARKED IN THE FIELD BY ENGINEER. ALL TREES >= 6" INDIAMETER NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED.7. TREES IDENTIFIED BY ENGINEER FOR ADDITIONAL PROTECTION SHALL BE PROTECTEDAGAINST ROOT COMPACTION, DAMAGE AND DISFIGUREMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITHMnDOT SPEC. 2572. PROTECTION OF TREES NOT IDENTIFIED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BEINCIDENTAL.8. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PRECAUTIONS TO MINIMIZE THE TRANSFER OF AQUATIC ANDTERRESTRIAL INVASIVE SPECIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE.EXISTING INDEX CONTOUREXISTING INTERMEDIATE CONTOUREXISTING PARCEL LINEEXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING FIBER OPTICEXISTING FENCE LINEEXISTING CONSERVATION EASEMENTEXISTING STREAM THALWEGEXISTING STREAM EXTENTSEXISTING WETLANDCONSTRUCTION LIMITSPROPOSED INDEX CONTOURPROPOSED INTERMEDIATE CONTOURPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED FENCECLEARING LIMITSSILT FENCEPROPOSED RIPRAPSTAGING AREA2015 SOIL BORINGEXISTING PIEZOMETER2018 SOIL BORING2019 SOIL BORING790788790788SSFOXWTSSPZ-1ST-1SB-1XTRAIL MODIFICATIONS CONTROL DATA - ALIGNMENT "T"TYPE/NO.L5L4L1L3C3C1C2START STATION8+93.46T6+98.92T0+00.00T4+18.32T8+09.77T2+74.65T6+07.62TSTART NORTHING165566.13165420.38164901.47165199.66165502.13165091.93165350.34START EASTING562121.28561992.54561526.73561600.03561819.44562067.41561724.57561934.04BEARINGN40°05'17"EN41°22'14"EN39°52'12"ERADIUS1000.00'1000.00'1000.00'END STATION12+01.99T8+09.77T1+00.00T2+74.65T6+07.62T8+93.46T4+18.32T6+98.92TEND NORTHING165810.29165502.13164969.49165091.93165350.34165566.13165199.66165420.38END EASTING562309.92562067.41561600.03561724.57561934.04562121.28561819.44561992.54189.30'LENGTH308.54'110.85'174.65'100.00'83.69'143.67'91.29'L21+00.00T164969.49PC STATIONPT STATION2+74.65T 4+18.32T6+98.92T6+07.62T8+93.46T8+09.77T0+57.27N166109.49562427.4203 S60°01'50"E 142.73'2+00.00N166038.19562551.07NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR CONTROL DATA - ALIGNMENT "N"TYPE/NO.L1START STATION START NORTHING START EASTING BEARINGRADIUSEND STATION END NORTHING END EASTINGLENGTHL2PC STATIONPT STATION0+00.00N166115.02562370.4194 S84°27'31"E 57.27'0+57.27N166109.49562427.42N33°54'46"EDRAINAGE CHANNEL AND STORM SEWER CONTROL DATA - ALIGNMENT "S"TYPE/NO.L5L4L1L2C2START STATION0+00.00SSTART NORTHING START EASTING BEARINGRADIUSEND STATION END NORTHING END EASTINGLENGTHC1PC STATIONPT STATION100.00'147.98'165393.40165553.35165270.60165708.50165975.17165582.74165424.43165582.74165393.40165975.17166040.09165708.501+82.14S3+47.52S1+47.98S8+07.79S8+89.87S4+97.93S3+15.21SN24°07'35"EN24°01'02"EN30°36'49"EN37°43'56"EN33°15'49"EN14°20'23"E34.16'32.32'309.87'82.08'150.40'133.06'165424.43165553.351+47.98S562110.90562193.47L3100.00'1+82.14S1+47.98S562193.47562207.36562207.36562240.32562240.32562253.411+82.14S3+15.21S3+47.52S3+15.21S 3+47.52S562253.41562335.914+97.93S562335.91562493.71562493.71562543.938+07.79S35.00'65.00'255.00'50.86'36.19'81.44'S76°09'17"WS17°27'51"WS11°04'29"E165127.63165161.71165241.29165116.50165127.63165161.702+37.43C1+86.58C1+50.39C0+68.95CS20°50'33"E68.95'165305.73165241.29SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET AND STREAMBANK REPAIR CONTROL DATA - ALIGNMENT "C"TYPE/NO.L1START STATION START NORTHING START EASTING BEARINGRADIUSEND STATION END NORTHING END EASTINGLENGTHC1PC STATIONPT STATION0+00.00CC2C30+68.95C562073.10562097.631+50.39C1+86.58C562097.63562113.21562102.49562113.21562057.34562102.490+68.95C1+50.39C1+86.58C2+37.43C1+86.58C1+50.39CST-7SYMBOLSALIGNMENT CONTROL DATACLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-01_TITLE SHEET AND INDEX.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 9:49 AMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN11/27/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES23101014.04-G-03 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIESITEM NO.ITEM DESCRIPTIONUNITTOTALESTIMATEDQUANTITY2021.501 MOBILIZATIONLUMP SUM 12051.501 MAINTENANCE & RESTORATION OF HAUL ROADS LUMP SUM 12101.505 CLEARINGACRE 4.302101.505 GRUBBINGACRE 4.302104.502 REMOVE CONCRETE HEADWALLEACH 12104.502 REMOVE PIEZOMETEREACH 22104.502 SALVAGE BENCHEACH 12104.503 REMOVE WOOD RETAINING WALLLIN FT 312104.503 REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCELIN FT 24462104.503REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) (NORTH PIPE)LIN FT 72104.607 SALVAGE RANDOM RIPRAPCU YD 1472104.601REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS (NORTH PIPE DEBRIS)LUMP SUM 12105.504 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE 5SQ YD16162105.601 DEWATERINGLUMP SUM 12105.601 CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROADLUMP SUM 12105.607 EXCAVATION - SPECIALCU YD 28242105.607 HAUL AND DISPOSE OF CONTAMINATED SOILCU YD 36712106.501 EXCAVATION - COMMONCU YD19,9902106.523COMMON EMBANKMENT (CV)CU YD 18082112.603 SUBGRADE PREPARATIONLIN FT 10272118.507AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS SPECIALCU YD 962130.523WATER (DUST CONTROL)MGAL 152211.507AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5CU YD 2532451.507COARSE AGGREGATE BEDDING (CV)CU YD 92501.502 95" SPAN GS PIPE-ARCH APRONEACH12501.502 24" CAS PIPE APRONEACH22503.603 24" HDPE PIPE SEWER-DIRECTIONAL DRILLEDLIN FT3022503.603 PLUG FILL AND ABANDON PIPE SEWERLIN FT1152507.603LINING CULVERT PIPE (95" SPAN) SPECIALLIN FT 72511.504GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE 4SQ YD352511.507RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS SPECIAL (SALVAGE)CU YD 1472511.507RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS SPECIAL (R270)CU YD 4442511.507RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS SPECIAL (R470)CU YD 5402511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS IIICU YD 2922511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS IVCU YD 1282511.507 GRANULAR FILTERCU YD 1012511.507GRANULAR FILTER MOD (B3)CU YD 4052511.602 PLACE BOULDEREACH 202557.603 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCELIN FT 1752573.501 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITLUMP SUM 22573.503SILT FENCE, TYPE MSLIN FT10,4222574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROWCU YD 15362575.504 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3NSQ YD12,4402575.504 FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID MATSQ YD12722575.504 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT CATEGORY 2SQ YD28202575.504 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 4SQ YD10,9902575.505 SEEDINGACRE 7.41CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
600'
10
0
'600'FOR DETAILED PLANSEECADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-04_SITE ACCESS PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:19 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROLOVERALL PLAN AND NOTES23101014.04-G-04 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.1-N0300600SCALE IN FEETFLYING
CLOUD
DR
IVE MOON VALLEYAGGREGATEANTICIPATED RIGHT OF ENTRY. ACCESSROUTE TO BE FINALIZED WITH PROPERTYOWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.RICE LAKEMINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILPIONEER
TRA
IL
TRAILS END ROADSITE ACCESS FROM HIGHVIEW DRIVEDEERBROOK DR
IVEHALLA GREENSGOLF COURSECONSTRUCTION LIMITSSOUTH REPAIR AREANORTH REPAIR AREA1G-05FOR DETAILED PLANSEE2G-05FOR DETAILED PLANSEE1G-06PLAN: OVERALL ACCESS PLANHIGH
V
I
E
W
D
R
I
V
ESITE ACCESS NOTES:1. LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE IN HIGHVIEW DRIVE AREA AREAPPROXIMATE. VERIFY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO MOBILIZING TO SITE. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR UTILITY LOCATE AND FIELD RECONNAISSANCE.2. POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTES ARE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. IF CONTRACTOR WISHES TO USEAN ALTERNATE ACCESS ROUTE, IT MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIORTO USE.3. TEMPORARY WETLAND FILL IS ONLY ALLOWED IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. DONOT PLACE FILL IN WETLANDS/DITCHES OUTSIDE OF THESE AREAS.4. SUBMIT MATERIAL PROPOSED FOR TEMPORARY FILL TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW.5. MAINTAIN FLOW IN DITCHES AND CONTROL WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAYINVOLVE THE INSTALLATION OF PIPES AND POTENTIALLY PUMPS.6. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCIDENTAL TO PAY ITEM 2051.501 MAINTENANCE & RESTORATIONOF HAUL ROADS:6.1. TRIMMING AND CLEARING TREES ALONG ACCESS ROUTE.6.2. FURNISHING AND INSTALLING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC IN WETLANDS6.3. FURNISHING AND INSTALLING TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLANDS6.4. CONTROLLING WATER AND MAINTAINING DRAINAGE IN DITCHES THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.6.5. PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL FILL AND/OR GRAVEL SURFACING OUTSIDE OF WETLANDAREAS AS CONTRACTOR DEEMS NECESSARY TO ACCESS THE SITE.6.6. REMOVAL OF GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AND TEMPORARY FILL FROM WETLANDS UPON THECOMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.6.7. SEEDING IMPACTED WETLANDS UPON THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.6.8. REGRADING THE TRAIL FROM HIGHVIEW DRIVE TO THE LANDSLIDE UPON COMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTION AND RESTORING THE TRAIL TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS ORBETTER TO THE SATISFACTION OF ENGINEER. FURNISHING AND INSTALLING AGGREGATESURFACING SHOWN ON DETAIL 3 ON SHEET G-06 WILL BE PAID UNDER SEPARATE PAYITEM.6.9. ALL COORDINATION, PREPARATION, CONSTRUCTION, AND RESTORATION ACTIVITIESASSOCIATED WITH ACCESS THROUGH MOON VALLEY AGGREGATE AND FROM HIGHVIEWDRIVE.7. PAY ITEM 2105.601 CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROAD IS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSROAD FROM HIGHVIEW DRIVE TO THE REGIONAL TRAIL JUST EAST OF PIONEER TRAIL THEFOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCIDENTAL TO PAY ITEM 2105.601 CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROAD:7.1. UTILITY LOCATE AND AVOIDANCE OF UTILITIES IN VICINITY OF ACCESS ROAD.7.2. ANY DESIGN NECESSARY FOR ACCESS ROAD.7.3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS ROAD (IF NECESSARY).7.4. SALVAGING AND REINSTALLING ANY SIGNS IN CONFLICT WITH ACCESS ROAD.7.5. PROTECTION OR SALVAGING AND REINSTALLING EXISTING GUARDRAIL.7.6. STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL UNDER FOOTPRINT OF RAMP (IF NECESSARY).7.7. REMOVAL OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF NECESSARY).7.8. WATER CONTROL, INCLUDING PIPES OR PUMPS TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE THROUGHACCESS ROAD DURING CONSTRUCTION.7.9. IMPORT OF FILL TO CONSTRUCT ACCESS ROAD.7.10. MAINTENANCE OF ACCESS ROAD DURING CONSTRUCTION.7.11. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY FILL FOR ACCESS ROAD.7.12. REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY BITUMINOUS PLACEMENT DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION.7.13. INSTALLING TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCH OR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TO RESTORETO PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS OR BETTER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THEENGINEER.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2TRAFFIC SIGNSQTY.MNDOTSIGN NO.SIGN SIZE SIGN MESSAGE3W11-1036" x 36"W
1
1
-
1
0DWG. NO.G-04TRAILCLOSEDTRAILCLOSEDAHEAD3R20-3A36" x 36"G-06G-075R11-236" x 26"W
1
1
-
1
0
W11-10G-06G-07
WTWTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-04_SITE ACCESS PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:20 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROLPLANS23101014.04-G-05 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.1-NMOON VALLEYAGGREGATEMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAILMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAILMATCH LINE - PLAN 2
MATCH LINE - PLAN 1
050100SCALE IN FEET2-PLAN: SITE ACCESS & STAGING N050100SCALE IN FEETCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSSTAGING AREASOUTH REPAIR AREANORTH REPAIR AREAPARCEL LINE (TYP.)CONSERVATION EASEMENTNEW STORM SEWEREXISTING CMPCONSERVATION EASEMENTPROPERTY LINE (TYP.)PLAN: SITE ACCESS & STAGINGSILT FENCESEE1C-04EXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINEEXISTING FENCEBEATRICE I. ZWIERSONIRREV. TRUSTSILT FENCESEE1C-04SILT FENCESEE1C-04MATCH LINE - SHEET G-06 POTENTIAL EASEMENT AREA (APPROX. 1.73 ACRES)OWNER: BEATRICE I. ZWIERSON IRREV. TRUSTHCRRAHCRRATEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT0.02 ACRES, SEETEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT<0.01 ACRES, SEEWETLAND BOUNDARYNEW DRAINAGECHANNEL2G-0629'2G-06179'EXISTING WOODEN FENCE(PROTECT OR SALVAGEAND REINSTALL FOLLOWINGCONSTRUCTION)RESTORE TRAIL PER UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION3G-06POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTEPOTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTERESTORE TRAIL PER UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION3G-06CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
WTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOECADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-04_SITE ACCESS PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:21 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSITE ACCESS, STAGING, AND TRAFFIC CONTROLPLAN AND DETAILS23101014.04-G-06 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.SILT FENCESEEHIGHVIEW DRIVEMATCH LINE - SHEET G-05MINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAILCONSTRUCTION LIMITSPARCEL LINE (TYP.)SITE ACCESS FROM HIGHVIEWDRIVE - COORDINATE ACCESSWITH CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIEAND HENNEPIN COUNTYPIONEER TRAILT
R
A
I
L
S
E
N
D
R
O
A
D1-N050100SCALE IN FEETSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT,SEE4C-041C-04PLAN: SITE ACCESS & STAGINGHCRRAHCRRAHCRRAHCRRAHENN
E
P
IN
COUN
T
YCARV
ER
COUN
T
Y
HIGHVIEW DRIVEROW LINESCONSTRUCT ACCESS ROADAS NECESSARY FOREQUIPMENT ACCESSPROTECT EXISTING CULVERTS,MAINTAIN DITCH DRAINAGETHROUGH PROPOSED ACCESSROAD DURING CONSTRUCTIONPROTECT EXISTINGFIRE HYDRANTPROTECT EXISTINGLIFT STATIONEXISTING GUARDRAIL(PROTECT OR SALVAGE AND REINSTALLFOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION)TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT0.01 ACRES, SEETEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT0.02 ACRES, SEEWETLAND BOUNDARYDETAIL: TEMPORARY WETLAND/DITCH FILLINGNOT TO SCALE2-EXISTING NORTH WETLAND/DITCHEXISTING TRAILEXISTING SOUTH WETLAND/DITCHINSTALL MnDOT TYPE 5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PRIORTO PLACING FILL IN WETLANDREMOVE AT COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTIONTEMPORARY FILL REMOVEAT COMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTIONEXISTING GROUNDRESTORE WETLAND AND DITCH ATCOMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF WETLANDSEED MIX TO DISTURBED AREAS AFTERREMOVING FILL AND GEOTEXTILETEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT0.01 ACRES, SEEPASSING AREA: 20' WIDTH X100' LENGTH2-2-2-122'112'178'DETAIL: GRAVEL TRAIL RESTORATIONNOT TO SCALE3-REGRADE SURFACE TO PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITIONSOR BETTER TO SATISFACTION OF ENGINEER10' TRAIL3" THICK 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATESURFACING CLASS SPECIAL(SEE TABLE FOR GRADATION)EXISTING GROUND2.0%2.0%3/8" MINUS GRADATION FORAGGREGATE SURFACING(CLASS SPECIAL)SIEVE SIZEPERCENT PASSING3/8"100#470-100#4020-50#20010-30TABLE 1NOTES:1. 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACING SHALL BE 100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE.2. 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACING MUST COME FROM KRAEMER MINING &MATERIALS, INC. OF BURNSVILLE, MN., IN ORDER TO MATCH COLOR OF EXISTINGTRAIL.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2RESTORE TRAIL PER UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION3G-06TRAILCLOSEDTRAILCLOSEDAHEADTRAILCLOSEDTRAILS END ROAD℄MAINTAIN 10' VERTICAL CLEARZONE ABOVE TRAIL. TRIM TREEBRANCHES ACCORDINGLY.4NOTES:1. 2' WIDTH AT MAX. 2% SLOPE ON SHOULDER.2. 3:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE (H:V) OUTSIDE OF 2' SHOULDER.3. PREFERRED 3' CLEARANCE, 2' MIN. FORM TREES OROTHER OBSTRUCTION.4. SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR TRAIL STRIPING, IF APPLICABLE.5. BOULEVARD VARIES IN WIDTH, BUT SHOULD BE A MIN..OF 2',. SIGN INSTALLATION NOT APPLICABLE IN ALLAREAS.6. MAX. CROSS SLOPE 2%.7. MIN. 3' CLEARANCE BETWEEN EDGE OF TRAIL ANDEDGE OF SIGN.3" TYPE SPWEA240C BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNOTES:1. BITUMINOUS SHALL BE PLACED IN ONE LIFT.2. CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TOMnDOT SPEC. 3138.3. SUBGRADE SHALL BE TEST ROLLED PRIOR TOAGGREGATE BASE INSTALLATION AND CONFORM TOMnDOT SPEC. 2111.4. WHERE BOULEVARD IS 2' TO 3' (MIN.), BOULEVARDSHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FROM IMPERVIOUSMATERIAL (IE. BITUMINOUS, CONCRETE, PAVERS,ETC). SPECIAL STRIPING LAYOUT MAY APPLY, (SEEPLAN SHEETS).4-DETAIL: BITUMINOUS TRAIL RESTORATIONNOT TO SCALE6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE12" SCARIFY, DRY, AND RECOMPACTSUBGRADE MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY OWNER.10'-0"6" TOPSOIL (TYP.)℄62ROADWAY7135TRAILCLOSEDREPAIR OR REPLACEBITUMINOUS TRAIL UPONCOMPLETION OFCONSTRUCTION, SEE4-
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-04_SITE ACCESS PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 11:43 AMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL CLOSURE SIGNAGE EAST OF LAKE RILEY23101014.04-G-07 A..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.MI
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
B
L
U
F
F
L
R
T
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
T
R
A
I
L RILEY LAKE RD.DELL RD.1-N0100200SCALE IN FEETPLAN: TRAIL CLOSURE SIGNAGE EAST OF LAKE RILEYCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION12/13/19----------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2TRAILCLOSEDAHEADPIONEER TRAILTRAILCLOSEDLAKE RILEYBEARPATH TRAILJACQUESPONDTRAILCLOSEDAHEADTRAILCLOSED
ST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-5ST-4PZ-2SB-3SB-2SB-1ST-1SB-5SB-6SB-4ST-7ST-8ST-9750750 750750760760 760760770770 770770780780 780780790790 790790790790790790790790790790790790 790790800800800800800800800800800800800800810810810810810810810810810810820820820820820820820820820820820820820820830830830830830830830830830830830830 830830840840840840840840840840840840840840840840850850
8508508608608
6
0
8
6
0
8708708
7
0
8
7
0
88088088
0
88
0
XXX750750760760 770770780780790790800800810810 820820 830830
7607607707707807807907908008008108108108108208207
9
0
7
9
0
8
0
0
8
0
0
810810820820N: 165093.23E: 561738.63N: 165106.02E: 561725.97N: 166065.67E: 562476.25N: 166146.44E: 562503.23CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_G-08_PROJECT LAYOUT PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:26 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNPROJECT LAYOUT PLAN23101014.04-G-08 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.EXI
S
T
I
N
G
C
M
P
A
1-NSITE ACCESS FROMHIGHVIEW DRIVESCALE IN FEET100500NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR,SEE SHEET C-17MOON VALLEYAGGREGATECONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSSOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSEE SHEET C-11NEW FENCEMINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILFILL EXISTING NORTH PIPE WITHGROUT AND ABANDON IN PLACESEE SHEET C-18PARCEL LINE (TYP.)STREAM BANK REPAIRSEE SHEET C-13SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLETMODIFICATIONS,SEE SHEET C-13CONSERVATION EASEMENTTRAIL MODIFICATIONSSEE SHEET C-07PLAN: PROJECT LAYOUTBEATRICE I.ZWIERSONIRREV. TRUSTPARCEL LINEEXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINESUMMARY OF ANTICIPATED EASEMENT NEEDSLANDOWNERREASON FOR EASEMENTBEATRICE I. ZWIERSON IRRREV. TRUSTRIPRAP AT SOUTH PIPE OUTLET, STREAMBANKREPAIRS, DRAINAGE CHANNEL, STAGING AREAAND SOUTH SIDE SITE ACCESSMOON VALLEY AGGREGATESOUTH SIDE SITE ACCESSPOTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTENEW STORM SEWERSEE SHEET C-19EXISTING FENCENEW DRAINAGECHANNELSEE SHEET C-19CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2NEW FENCE,SEE3C-18POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTECLEARING LIMITS
WTWTWTWTWTWTWTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO
FOFOFOFOSS SS
SSSSSSSSSSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-5ST-4PZ-2SB-3SB-2SB-1ST-1SB-5SB-6SB-4ST-7ST-8ST-9750750 750750760760 760760770770 770770780780780780780780 780780790790790790790790 790790800800800800800800800800800800800800810810810810810810810810 810810820820820820820820820820820820820820 820820830830830830
83083083083083083083083083083083083083083083083083083084084084084084084084084084084084084084084085085085085086086086086087087087087088088088088089089089089090090090090077
0
77
0
77
0
77
0
780780780780790790800800810810810810820820820820 830830830830CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-01_EXISTING CONDITIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:29 PM
1-NSITE ACCESS FROMHIGHVIEW DRIVESCALE IN FEET100500MOON VALLEYAGGREGATECONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXI
S
T
I
N
G
C
M
P
A
MINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILPARCEL LINE (TYP.)CONSERVATION EASEMENTEXISTING 18" DIPAPPROXIMATE LANDSLIDE LIMITSEXISTING CHAINLINK FENCEEXISTING STREAM THALWEGEXISTING STORM SEWERCHAINLINK FENCENORTH PIPE CROSSING(SEE PHOTO 5, SHEET C-02)NORTH PIPE UPSTREAM INLET(SEE PHOTO 6, SHEET C-02)EXISTING FIBER OPTIC CABLEEXISTING CONCRETE HEADWALL(SEE PHOTOS 2-4, SHEET C-02)TEMPORARY REPAIR RIPRAP AREA(SEE PHOTOS 1-4, SHEET C-02)APPROXIMATE LANDSLIDE SPOIL PILEGENERAL NOTES:1. ALL UTILITY INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BEFIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR.PLAN: EXISTING CONDITIONSBEATRICE I. ZWIERSONIRREV. TRUSTPARCEL LINEEXISTING STREAM EXTENTSREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNEXISTING CONDITIONSPLAN23101014.04-C-01 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.APPROXIMATE SLOPEEROSION LIMITSEXISTING BENCHEXISTING WOODEN FENCE ANDMODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALLCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-02_EXISTING PHOTOS AND SECTIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:00 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..PHOTO 4: EXISTING SOUTH PIPE OUTLET (10/29/2019)PHOTO 2: EXISTING SOUTH PIPE OUTLET (4/26/2019)PHOTO 1: EXISTING SOUTH PIPE OUTLET (4/26/2019) (LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)PHOTO 3: EXISTING SOUTH PIPE OUTLET (10/29/2019)PHOTO 5: EXISTING NORTH PIPE DOWNSTREAM OUTLETPHOTO 6: EXISTING NORTH PIPE UPSTREAM INLET (4/26/2019)REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNEXISTING CONDITIONSPHOTOS 23101014.04-C-02 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
750750750750760760760760770770770770770770770770
770770 770770780780780780780780780780790790790790790790 7907908008008008008008008008008008008008008008008008008108108
1
0
8
1
0
810810810810810810810810810810
8
1
0
8
1
0 810810810810820820820820820820820820820820
82082082082082082083083083083083083083083083083083
0
83
0 830830830830840840840840840840840840840840
84
0
84
0 840840840840840840840840
8508508
5
0
8
5
0
850850 850850860860860860 870870870870880880WTWTWTWTWT WTST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-5ST-4PZ-2SB-3SB-2SB-1ST-1SB-5SB-6SB-4ST-7ST-8ST-9CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-03_EROSION CONTROL PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:01 PM1-PLAN: REMOVALS AND TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NSCALE IN FEET120600MOON VALLEYAGGREGATECONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING CMPAMINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILPROPERTY LINE (TYP.)CONSERVATION EASEMENTEROSION CONTOL LEGENDSILT FENCESEDIMENT LOGSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEXISTING 10' CONTOUREXISTING 2' CONTOURSILT FENCE (TYP.)SEE1C-04PROTECTEXISTING TRAILCONSTRUCTIONSTAGING AREAEROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES:1. INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS PRIOR TOTHE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBANCE OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.2. BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE AT EACH POINT WHERE VEHICLES EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE PRIOR TOCOMMENCING ANY CLEARING/GRUBBING, REMOVAL, OR EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES. USE 2 INCHOR GREATER DIAMETER ROCK IN A LAYER AT LEAST 6 INCHES THICK ACROSS THE ENTIREWIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE. EXTEND THE ROCK ENTRANCE AT LEAST 50 FEET INTO THECONSTRUCTION ZONE USING A GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC BENEATH THE AGGREGATE TO PREVENTMIGRATION OF SOIL INTO THE ROCK FROM BELOW.3. REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC ANDPRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS. AT A MINIMUM REMOVAL SHALL BE ONCE DAILY. SWEEPING SHALLBE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DONE IN A MANNERTO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CATCH BASIN INLETS WHICH RECEIVERUNOFF FROM THE DISTURBED AREAS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN, REMOVE SEDIMENT, ORREPLACE STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ON A ROUTINE BASIS SUCH THAT THEDEVICES ARE FULLY FUNCTIONAL FOR THE NEXT RAIN EVENT. SEDIMENT DEPOSITED INAND/OR PLUGGING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. HAYBALES OR FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED GRATES ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR INLET PROTECTION.5. LOCATE SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES NO LESS THAIN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATEROADWAY OR DRAINAGE CHANNEL. IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS, STABILIZETHE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING, VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPS, OR OTHER MEANS. CONTROLEROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT BARRIERS AROUND THE PILES.6. MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THECONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED, ORROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY.7. TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS WHICH HAVEUNDERGONE FINAL GRADING, AND ALL AREAS IN WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDINGCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN,WIND AND RUNNING WATER. STABILIZATION TO BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AND BE COMPLETEDWITHIN 14 DAYS. USE SEED AND MULCH, EROSION CONTROL MATTIING, AND/OR SODDING ANDSTAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS. REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC, STRUCTURAL,NON-BIODEGRADABLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE SITE HASUNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT. FINALSTABILIZATION FOR PURPOSES OF THIS REMOVAL IS 70% ESTABLISHED COVER OVERDENUDED AREA.8. CHANGES TO APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERPRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION AND DETAILS FOR ALLPROPOSED ALTERNATE TYPE DEVICES.9. IF DEWATERING OR PUMPING OF WATER IS NECESSARY, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLEFOR OBTAINING ANY NECESSARY PERMITS AND/OR APPROVALS PRIOR TO DISCHARGE OF ANYWATER FROM THE SITE. IF THE DISCHARGE FROM THE DEWATERING OR PUMPING PROCESS ISTURBID OR CONTAINS SEDIMENT LADEN WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED THROUGH THE USE OFSEDIMENT TRAPS, VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS, OR OTHER SEDIMENT REDUCING MEASURESSUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE IS NOT VISIBLY DIFFERENT FROM THE RECEIVING WATER.ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE DISCHARGE POINT TOPREVENT SCOUR EROSION.10. INSTALL SEED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, MULCH, AND OTHER REVETMENT INACCORDANCE WITH DESIGN DRAWING SHEETS R-01 AND R-02.11. BOTH CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL KEEP A LOG OF ALL TREES GREATER THAN 6"DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SEE SHEET R-02 FOR TREEREPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS.SITE ACCESS FROM HIGHVIEW DRIVE(SEE SHEET G-06)REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNREMOVALS AND TEMPORARYEROSION CONTROL PLAN23101014.04-C-03 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.SALVAGE EXISTING BENCH AND PLACE INTHE GRAVEL PARKING LOT ADJACENT TOBLUFF CREEK DR. PARK DISTRICT STAFFWILL HAUL BENCHES AWAY.SALVAGE AND STOCKPILEEXISTING RIPRAP FOR REUSEREMOVE EXISTINGCONCRETE HEADWALLSALVAGE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE AND GATES(APPROX. 2446 LF) AND PLACE IN THE GRAVELPARKING LOT ADJACENT TO BLUFF CREEK DR.PARK DISTRICT STAFF WILL HAUL AWAY.APPROXIMATE LANDSLIDE LIMITSAPPROXIMATE LANDSLIDE LIMITSREMOVE EXISTING WOODEN FENCEREMOVE EXPOSED PORTIONOF NORTH PIPE, SEE C-18REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTINGPIEZOMETERS PER ENGINEER'S DIRECTIONREMOVE EXISTING MODULARBLOCK RETAINING WALLREMOVE EXISTINGPIPE DEBRISFILL EXISTING NORTHPIPE WITH GROUT ANDABANDON IN PLACE,SEE C-18CLEARING LIMITSCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
DETAIL: SILT FENCE - MACHINE SLICED-1NOT TO SCALEDOWNSTREAM VIEWSECTION VIEW5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POSTAT 4 FT. MAX. SPACINGGEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36" MIN.MACHINE SLICE 8" TO 12"DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP)GRADEPLASTIC ZIP TIES (MIN. 50 LBSTENSILE STRENGTH) ON TOP8" MIN. 3 PER POSTRUNOFF FLOW DIRECTIONMACHINE SLICE 8"-12"DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP)MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE PER MN/DOT STD.SPECIFICATION 3886, INSTALL PER MN/DOTSTD. SPEC. 2573NOTES:1. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING WORK IN THE AREA TO BE PROTECTED AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. SILTFENCE AND ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FINAL GRADING AND SITE STABILIZATION.2. SILT FENCE INSTALLATION AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS 2573 AND 3886.3. NO HOLES OR GAPS SHALL BE PRESENT IN/UNDER SILT FENCE. PREPARE AREA AS NEEDED TO SMOOTH SURFACE OR REMOVE DEBRIS.4. WHEN SEDIMENT BUILD UP REACHES 1/3 OF FENCE HEIGHT, THE SILT FENCE SHOULD BE REMOVED OR A SECOND SILT FENCE INSTALLED UPSTREAM OF THE EXISTING FENCE AT ASUITABLE DISTANCE.5. WHEN SPLICES ARE NECESSARY MAKE SPLICE AT POST ACCORDING TO SPLICE DETAIL. PLACE THE END POST OF THE SECOND FENCE INSIDE THE END POST OF THE FIRST FENCE.ROTATE BOTH POSTS TOGETHER AT LEAST 180 DEGREES TO CREATE A TIGHT SEAL WITH THE FABRIC MATERIAL. CUT THE FABRIC NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE POSTS TOACCOMMODATE THE 6 INCH FLAP. THEN DRIVE BOTH POSTS AND BURY THE FLAP. COMPACT BACKFILL.NOT TO SCALE1
2
'
M
INDETAIL: STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITAS REQU
IRED-NOTES:1. MAINTAIN ENTRANCE THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIODAND REPAIR OR REPLACE AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT TRACKINGOFFSITE.2. REMOVE ENTRANCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH FINAL GRADING AND SITESTABILIZATION.4EXPAND FOR TURNINGRADIUS AS REQUIRED6" MINIMUM1"-2" WASHED ROCKGEOTEXTILE FABRIC (OPTIONAL)2-DETAIL: INLET PROTECTION - SEDIMENT LOGNOT TO SCALENOTES:1. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING WORK IN THE AREA TO BEPROTECTED OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CATCHBASIN INSTALLATION, AND SHALL BEMAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.2. MATERIALS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FLOW WHILE BLOCKING SEDIMENT. NO HOLESOR GAPS SHALL BE PRESENT IN/UNDER SEDIMENT LOG.3. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE CLEANED AS REQUIRED.4. MATERIALS AND ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED IN CONJUNCTION WITHTHE FINAL GRADING AND SITE STABILIZATION.STORM GRATESEDIMENT LOGCURBSTAKE ENDS (TYP)STAKE END (TYP)CURBSEDIMENT LOGCATCHBASINCURBSECTION VIEWPLAN VIEW42623A3BSLOPE INSTALLATIONNOTES:1.REFER TO MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STAPLE PATTERNS FOR SLOPE INSTALLATIONS.2.PREPARE SOIL BY LOOSENING TOP 1-2 INCHES AND APPLY SEED (AND FERTILIZER WHERE REQUIRED)PRIOR TO INSTALLING BLANKETS. GROUND SHOULD BE SMOOTH AND FREE OF DEBRIS.3.BEGIN (A) AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE AND ROLL THE BLANKETS DOWN OR (B) AT ONE END OF THESLOPE AND ROLL THE BLANKETS HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE.4.THE EDGES OF PARALLEL BLANKETS MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP, WITH THEUPHILL BLANKET ON TOP.5.WHEN BLANKETS MUST BE SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE, PLACE BLANKETS END OVER END (SHINGLESTYLE) WITH APPROXIMATELY 6" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY12" APART.6.BLANKET MATERIALS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED OR AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER.5-DETAIL: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - INSTALLATIONNOT TO SCALEFLOWFLOWSEDIMENT LOGWOOD STAKESEDIMENT LOGWOOD STAKEDETAIL: EROSION LOG - STAKING-3NOT TO SCALESIDE VIEW FLATFRONT VIEWFLOWSEDIMENT LOGSIDE VIEW ON SLOPETOP VIEWWOOD STAKEOVERLAP ENDSNOTES:1. INSTALL SEDIMENT LOG ALONG CONTOURS (CONSTANT ELEVATION).2. NO GAPS SHALL BE PRESENT UNDER SEDIMENT LOG. PREPARE AREA AS NEEDED TOSMOOTH SURFACE OR REMOVE DEBRIS.3. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT WHEN REACHING 1/3 OF LOG HEIGHT.4. MAINTAIN SEDIMENT LOG THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AND REPAIR ORREPLACED AS REQUIRED.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-04_EROSION CONTROL DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:02 PMrlg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_Drawing_D 4_Erosion Control Details.dwg Plot at 0 12/21/2015 16:08:36..TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM TEMPORARY SEEDING IN ADDITION TO TEMPORARY MULCHINGON GRADED/DISTURBED AREAS WHEN THE SITE IS TO BE LEFT IDLE FOR LONGER THAN 21 DAYS -IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 2575.3 B.1, USE COVERCROP AND MID-TERM STABILIZATION SEED MIXTURES AS SHOWN IN 3876, "SEED", TABLE 3876-1FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING2. PERFORM TEMPORARY MULCHING TO PROTECT THE SITE FROM EROSION WHEN LEFT IDLE FORMORE THAN ONE WEEK AND DURING NON-SEEDING PERIODS AND WHEN OUTSIDE THE SEEDINGAND SODDING DATES. FOR AREAS LESS THAN TWO ACRES, MULCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOTSTANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 2575.3.M, "RAPID STABILIZATION"REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRAAMINNEAPOLIS, MN.LANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLDETAILS23101014.04-C-04 D90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554351.0 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INFORMATION:THIS STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) HAS BEEN PREPARED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA GENERALSTORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY NO. MNR100001 (GENERAL PERMIT), AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTAPOLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSALSYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) PROGRAM.THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIESWILL TAKE PLACE ALONG AND JUST SOUTH OF THE MINNESOTA BLUFFS REGIONAL TRAIL BETWEEN FLYING CLOUD ROAD ANDLAKOTA LANE. THE APPROXIMATE CENTROID OF THE PROJECT HAS A LATITUDE OF 44.819492 AND A LONGITUDE OF -93.526089.THIS PROJECT INVOLVES EROSION CONTROL, REPAIR AND REGRADING OF LANDSLIDE DAMAGED SLOPES, REPAIR OF DAMAGEDCULVERTS, INSTALLATION OF STORM SEWER AND MANHOLES AND SITE RESTORATION . THE PROJECT AS PROPOSED HAS A TOTALDISTURBANCE AREA OF 7.22 ACRES. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED TO MINIMIZESEDIMENT FROM BEING TRANSPORTED INTO BLUFF CREEK, WHICH IS AN IMPAIRED WATER. REFER TO PROJECT DRAWINGS FORFURTHER DETAILS. (CSW PERMIT PART III.A.1)1.1 PROJECT SIZE AND CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE:·THE ANTICIPATED AREA OF DISTURBANCE IS APPROXIMATELY 7.22 ACRES.·THE TOTAL AREA OF PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 0.70 ACRES.·THE TOTAL AREA OF POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 0.70 ACRES.·THE TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA IS APPROXIMATELY 0 ACRES.1.2 DATES OF CONSTRUCTION:·ANTICIPATED START DATE: TBDANTICIPATED END DATE: TBD1.3 CONTACT INFORMATION:OWNER: HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITYMAILING ADDRESS: 701 4TH AVE. S. #400CONTACT PERSON: JESSICA GALATZTITLE: PROJECT MANAGERPHONE NUMBER: (612) 348-2691EMAIL ADDRESS: JESSICA.GALATZ@HENNEPIN.USALTERNATE CONTACT PERSON: KRISTINE STEHLYTITLE: PROJECT ENGINEERPHONE NUMBER: (612) 348-6370EMAIL ADDRESS: KRISTINE.STEHLY@HENNEPIN.USOPERATOR / GENERAL CONTRACTOR (WILL OVERSEE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP): TBDMAILING ADDRESS:CONTACT PERSON: TITLE:PHONE NUMBER: EMAIL ADDRESS:PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG-TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITYMAILING ADDRESS: 701 4TH AVE. S. #400CONTACT PERSON: JESSICA GALATZTITLE: PROJECT MANAGERPHONE NUMBER: (612) 348-2691EMAIL ADDRESS: JESSICA.GALATZ@HENNEPIS.US2.0 RECEIVING WATERS:WATERS WITHIN ONE MILE (NEAREST STRAIGHT LINE DISTANCE) THAT ARE LIKELY TO RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THEPROJECT SITE (CSW PERMIT ITEM 5.10) INCLUDE:SPECIAL IMPAIRED PUBLIC WATER WITH WORKNAME OF WATER BODYTYPE (1)WATER BODY ID (2)WATER? (3)WATER? (3)IN WATER RESTRICTIONS?BLUFF CREEKCREEK07020012-710NOYES NORICE LAKELAKE27-0132-00NONO NO(1) TYPE EXAMPLES: DITCH, POND, WETLAND, CALCAREOUS FEN, LAKE, STREAM, RIVER(2) WATER BODY IDENTIFICATION (ID) MIGHT NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR ALL WATER BODIES. USE THE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT: HTTPS://WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER-SPECIAL-AND-IMPAIRED-WATERS-SEARCH(3) REFER TO CSW PERMIT SECTION 23. IMPAIRED WATER FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS(NUTRIENT EUTROPHICATION BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS), TURBIDITY, TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS), DISSOLVED OXYGEN,OR AQUATIC BIOTA (FISH BIOASSESSMENT, AQUATIC PLANT BIOASSESSMENT, AND AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATE BIOASSESSMENT)2.1 SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS: THE MPCA'S SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL WAS USED TO LOCATE SPECIALAND IMPAIRED WATERS WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUS MEASUREMENT) OF THE PROJECT SITE.BLUFF CREEK HAS ANEPA-APPROVED IMPAIRMENT FOR TURBIDITY AND FISH BIOTA. THESE IMPAIRMENTS ARE CONSIDERED CONSTRUCTION RELATEDAND REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) OR PLAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERALPERMIT. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 2.7 AND SECTION 23)ADDITIONAL BMPS OR OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN AN APPROVEDTOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) INCLUDE IMMEDIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS AND CONSTRUCTION OF ATEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH 5 OR MORE ACRES . (CSWPERMIT ITEM 5.19)2.2 PUBLIC WATERS WITH WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS: THIS PROJECT DOES NOT INCLUDE WORK IN PUBLIC WATERS. (CSWPERMIT ITEM 5.11)2.3 WETLAND IMPACTS: THIS PROJECT DOES NOT INCLUDE WETLAND IMPACTS. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.4 AND 2.10, AND SECTION 22)2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND OTHER REQUIRED REVIEWS: STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES ARE NOT REQUIRED AS ARESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (E.G., EAW OR EIS), ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES REVIEW, ARCHEOLOGICALSITE REVIEW, OR OTHER LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL REVIEW CONDUCTED FOR THE PROJECT. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.8, 2.9, AND5.16)2.5 KARST AREAS OR DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS: THIS PROJECT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY KARST ORDRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 16.19, 16.20, AND 18.10)3.0 PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS:REQUIRED FEATURESHEET NUMBER·PROJECT LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITSG-01·EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARIES, DIRECTIONS C-06,C-14,C-16OF FLOW AND ALL DISCHARGE POINTS WHERE STORMWATER IS LEAVING THE SITE ORENTERING A SURFACE WATER·SOIL TYPES AT THE SITEC-05A·LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACESC-06,C-14,C-16·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT BE BE DISTURBED (E.G., BUFFER ZONES, WETLANDS, ETC.) C-06,C-14,C-16·LOCATIONS OF AREAS OF STEEP SLOPESC-06,C-14,C-16·LOCATIONS OF AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE PHASED TO MINIMIZE DURATION NAOF EXPOSED SOILS·PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO A PUBLIC WATER WITH DNR WORK IN WATER NARESTRICTIONS FOR FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMES·LOCATIONS OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL C-03,G-05,G-06BMPS AS REQUIRED IN PERMIT SECTIONS 8 THROUGH 10 AND 14 THROUGH 19·BUFFER ZONES AS REQUIRED IN PERMIT ITEMS 9.17 AND 23.11C-06,C-14,C-16·LOCATIONS OF POTENTIAL POLLUTION-GENERATING ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN PERMIT C-06,C-14,C-16SECTION 12·STANDARD DETAILS FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE INSTALLED C-04AT THE SITE4.0 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS):4.1 EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES:1. BEFORE LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN, THE LIMITS OF THE AREAS TO BE DISTURBED DURINGCONSTRUCTION WILL BE DELINEATED WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.2. TEMPORARY STABILIZATION OF SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 8.4, 8.5, AND 23.9)a. AREAS OF EXPOSED SOIL WILL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, PRESERVATION OFMATURE VEGETATION, MULCH OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES.b. IF PRESENT, SOIL STOCKPILES WILL BE STABILIZED WITH MULCH (SUCH AS STRAW MULCH, EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETS OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES.c. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEANAGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) AND THECONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS, AND SIMILAR SURFACES ARE EXEMPTFROM THESE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS.2. STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 8.6 THROUGH 8.8)a. IF SOILS WITHIN EXISTING STORMWATER DITCHES OR SWALES ARE DISTURBED, THEY WILL BESTABILIZED WITH CHANNEL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, RIPRAP, TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT OREQUIVALENT MEASURES.b. MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE, OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICESWILL NOT BE USED TO STABILIZE ANY PART OF AN EXISTING STORMWATER DITCH OR SWALE WITH ACONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.c. THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET OF LENGTH OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE,OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE SITE, WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, ORFROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER WILL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURSAFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE.d. STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES ORSWALES WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATEROR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY ORPERMANENTLY CEASED.3. ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS: ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS WILL BE PROVIDED WITHONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOW METHODS: RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES.(CSW PERMIT ITEM 8.9)4. EROSION PREVENTION IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINES: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.4, 8.4 THROUGH 8.6, AND 23.9)a. STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES) WILL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TOLIMIT SOIL EROSION WHENEVER ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILYCEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14CALENDAR DAYS.b. IF THE EXPOSED SOIL AREAS DRAIN TO A DISCHARGE POINT THAT IS WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUSMEASUREMENT) OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER (SEE SECTION 2.0), STABILIZATION OF EXPOSEDSOIL AREAS (INCLUDING STOCKPILES) WILL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSIONWHENEVER ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANYPORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 7 CALENDAR DAYS.c. THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES CAN BE TAKEN TO INITIATE STABILIZATION: PREPPING THE SOIL FORVEGETATIVE OR NON-VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION, APPLYING MULCH OR OTHER NON-VEGETATIVEPRODUCT TO THE EXPOSED SOIL AREA, OR SEEDING OR PLANTING THE EXPOSED AREA.5. ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES: THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTIONMETHODS WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 8.2, 8.3, AND8.10)a. SOIL DISTURBANCE WILL BE MINIMIZED WHEREVER POSSIBLE TO AID IN EROSION PREVENTION.b. EXISTING VEGETATION WILL BE PRESERVED WHEREVER POSSIBLE TO LIMIT EXPOSED SOIL AND THUSWILL SERVE AS NATURAL VEGETATIVE BUFFERS.c.EXPOSED SOIL ON STEEP SLOPES (≤3H:1V) WILL BE STABILIZED USING EROSION CONTROL BLANKETSAND SEEDING.d. HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING WILL BE UTILIZED TO MINIMIZE EROSION POTENTIAL.e. TERRACING WILL BE USED TO MINIMIZED EROSION POTENTIAL.4.2 SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES:1. DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROLS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 9.2 THROUGH 9.6)a. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS ANDLOCATED UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WILL INCLUDE: SILTFENCE, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS / BIOROLLS (FILLED WITH COMPOST, WOOD CHIPS, ROCK, ETC.),VEGETATIVE BUFFERS (RETAIN EXISTING VEGETATION WHERE POSSIBLE), OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES.b. PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENTLAND‐DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL PERMANENT COVER HAS BEENESTABLISHED.c. IF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATESHORT‐TERM ACTIVITIES (SUCH AS CLEARING, GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES), THE CONTROLSMUST BE RE-INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT‐TERM ACTIVITY HAS BEENCOMPLETED. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE RE-INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXTPRECIPITATION EVENT, EVEN IF THE SHORT‐TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE.d. IF THE DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED (BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OREXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT), INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TOIDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES.2. SOIL STOCKPILE PERIMETER CONTROLS: TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES WILL BE SURROUNDED BY: DOUBLEROWS OF SILT FENCE, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS OR EQUIVALENT MEASURES, AND SHALL NOT BE PLACEDIN ANY NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS.(CSW PERMIT ITEMS 9.9 AND 9.10)3. STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 9.7 AND 9.8)a. INLET PROTECTION BMPS WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS DOWNGRADIENT OFCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.b. STORM DRAIN INLETS WILL BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGINGTO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.c. INLET PROTECTION BMPS WILL BE: SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG, FILTER SACKS, OR EQUIVALENTMEASURES.4. VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 9.11 AND 9.12)a. VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS WILL BE INSTALLED TO MINIMIZE THE TRACKING OUT OF SEDIMENT FROMTHE CONSTRUCTION AREA AND WILL INCLUDE: ROCK PADS AND MUD MATS OR AN EQUIVALENTSYSTEM.b. IF SUCH VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKEDONTO THE PAVED ROAD, STREET SWEEPING WILL ALSO BE EMPLOYED. SEDIMENT WILL BE REMOVEDBY SWEEPING WITHIN 24 HOURS.5. PROTECTION OF INFILTRATION AREAS: IF NECESSARY, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSIONBERMS) WILL BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHENEXCAVATED PRIOR TO ESTABLISHING PERMANENT COVER WITHIN THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA.(CSW PERMIT ITEMS 16.4 AND 16.5)6. MINIMIZATION OF SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVATION OF TOPSOIL: SOIL COMPACTION WILL BEMINIMIZED AND TOPSOIL WILL BE PRESERVED WHERE POSSIBLE. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.24, 9.14, AND 9.15)7. PRIORITIZATION OF ONSITE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL: (CSW PERMIT ITEM 9.16)a. PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL WILL BE IMPLEMENTEDONSITE WHERE POSSIBLE.b. DISCHARGES FROM BMPS WILL BE DIRECTED TO VEGETATED AREAS OF THE SITE (INCLUDING ANYNATURAL BUFFERS) IN ORDER TO INCREASE SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND MAXIMIZE STORMWATERINFILTRATION. IF EROSION IS NOTED TO OCCUR AS THE RESULT OF SUCH A DISCHARGE, VELOCITYDISSIPATION BMPS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND INSTALLED AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION.8. BUFFER ZONE OR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS TO PROTECT SURFACE WATERS: (CSW PERMIT ITEM9.17)a. A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER WILL BE PRESERVED IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS DISCHARGING TO ANON-SPECIAL/NON-IMPAIRED SURFACE WATER OR WETLAND. IF A NON-SPECIAL/NON-IMPAIREDSURFACE WATER OR WETLAND IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCESAND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER, OR WHEN A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, REDUNDANTSEDIMENT CONTROLS WILL BE PROVIDED.b. A 100-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER WILL BE PRESERVED IN CONSTRUCTION AREAS DISCHARGING TO ASPECIAL OR IMPAIRED SURFACE WATER. IF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED SURFACE WATER IS LOCATEDWITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THESURFACE WATER, OR WHEN A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS WILL BEPROVIDED.c. REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROLS WILL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BYLACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE.9. USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) IS NOTANTICIPATED AS PART OF THE PROJECT. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.22 AND 9.18)10. THE PROJECT WILL NOT INCLUDE 10 OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOIL DRAINING TO A COMMONLOCATION OR 5 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMONLOCATION WITHIN 1 MILE OR A SPECIAL ORIMPAIRED WATER THEREFORE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS ARE NOT REQUIRED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.6,9.13, AND 23.10 AND SECTION 14)4.3 DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING: NO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING WILL OCCUR AS PART OF THISPROJECT. (CSW PERMIT SECTION 10 AND ITEM 10.5)4.4 BMP DESIGN FACTORS: THE FOLLOWING BMP DESIGN FACTORS HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IN DESIGNING THETEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS:1. EXPECTED AMOUNT, FREQUENCY, INTENSITY, AND DURATION OF PRECIPITATION.2. NATURE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND RUN‐ON AT THE SITE, INCLUDING FACTORS SUCH AS EXPECTEDFLOW FROM IMPERVIOUS SURFACES, SLOPES, AND SITE DRAINAGE FEATURES.3. STORMWATER VOLUME, VELOCITY, AND PEAK FLOW RATES TO MINIMIZE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS INSTORMWATER AND TO MINIMIZE CHANNEL AND STREAMBANK EROSION AND SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATEVICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS.4. RANGE OF SOIL PARTICLE SIZES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT.(SEE PAGE 2 OF 2)CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-05_SWPPP.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:03 PMREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP)23101014.04-C-05 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554355.0 PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IS REQUIRED IF THE PROJECT RESULTS IN ONE ACRE OR MOREOF NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR RESULTS IN A NET INCREASE OF ONE OR MORE ACRES OF CUMMULATIVE NEWIMPERVIOUS SURFACES IN TOTAL OR IF THE PROJECT IS PART OF A LARGER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. (CSW PERMITITEM 15.3)5.1 A PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM IS NOT REQUIRED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 5.15, 15.4-15.9, AND23.14)5.2 THIS IS NOT A LINEAR PROJECT WITH LACK OF RIGHT OR WAY. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 15.9)5.3 THIS PROJECT DOES NOT DISCHARGE TO A TROUT STREAM (OR A TRIBUTARY TO A TROUT STREAM). (CSW PERMITITEM 23.12)6.0 INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES:6.1 PERSONS WITH REQUIRED TRAINING: TRAINED INDIVIDUALS INCLUDE THOSE PARTIES RESPONSIBLE FORINSTALLING, SUPERVISING, REPAIRING, INSPECTING, AND MAINTAINING EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL BMPS AT THE SITE. TRAINED INDIVIDUALS ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPPAND COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL PERMIT UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETE, PERMANENTCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS5.20, 5.21, AND 11.9 AND SECTION 21)THESE INDIVIDUALS WILL BE TRAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT,INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE CONTENT AND EXTENT OF TRAINING WILL BE COMMENSURATE WITH THEINDIVIDUAL'S JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.BELOW IS A LIST OF PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS PROJECT WHO ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THEAPPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS.TRAINED INDIVIDUALRESPONSIBILITYTRAINING ENTITY* TRAINING DATEERIC FITZGERALD PREPARATION OF THE SWPPPUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 2017TBDOVERSIGHT OF SWPPP IMPLEMENTA- TBDTBDTION, REVISION, AND AMMENDMENTTBDPERFORMANCE OF SWPPP INSPECTIONS TBDTBDTBDPERFORMANCE OR SUPERVISION OF TBDTBDINSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, ANDREPAIR OF BMPS*TRAINING DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 6.2 FREQUENCY OF INSPECTIONS: A TRAINED PERSON WILL ROUTINELY INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE.(CSW PERMIT ITEMS 11.2, 11.10, AND 23.13)·AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION·WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURSINSPECTION FREQUENCY MAY BE ADJUSTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES:·WHERE PARTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREAS HAVE PERMANENT COVER, BUT WORK REMAINS ON OTHER PARTSOF THE SITE, INSPECTIONS OF THE AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER MAY BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH.·WHERE CONSTRUCTION AREAS HAVE PERMANENT COVER AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ONTHE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDEDCOMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES.·WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, THEINSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE MUST BEGINWITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER RUNOFF OCCURS AT THE SITE OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVERCOMES FIRST.6.3 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS: EACH CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER SITE INSPECTION WILL INCLUDE INSPECTIONOF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 11.3 THROUGH 11.8)·ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENTMEASURES·SURFACE WATERS FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION·CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS FOR EVIDENCE OF OFFSITE SEDIMENT TRACKING·STREETS AND OTHER AREAS ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF SITE ACCUMULATIONS OFSEDIMENT6.4 MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS: MAINTENANCE OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS AND BMPS WILL BE PERFORMED ASFOLLOWS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 11.3 THROUGH 11.8)·NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WILL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE ENDOF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS.·PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOMENONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.·TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS WILL BE DRAINED AND THE SEDIMENT REMOVED WHENTHE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.·DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS WILL BE REMOVED, AND THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENTREMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL WILL BE RE-STABILIZED. THE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WILL BECOMPLETED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, ORPHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. IF PRECLUDED DUE TO ACCESS CONSTRAINTS, REASONABLE EFFORTS TOOBTAIN ACCESS WILL BE USED. REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WILL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OFOBTAINING ACCESS.·TRACKED SEDIMENT ON PAVED SURFACES WILL BE REMOVED WITHIN 1 CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY.·AREAS UNDERGOING STABILIZATION WILL BE RESTABILIZED AS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE REQUIRED COVER.6.5 RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS: (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 11.11 AND 24.5 AND SECTIONS 6 AND 20)1. ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WILL BE RECORDED IN WRITING WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEINGCONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS WILL BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. RECORDS OF EACH INSPECTION ANDMAINTENANCE ACTIVITY WILL INCLUDE THE DATE AND TIME; NAME OF INSPECTOR(S); FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS;CORRECTIVE ACTIONS (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); ANDDATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOREACH EVENT.a. IF ANY DISCHARGE IS OBSERVED DURING THE INSPECTION, THE LOCATION AND APPEARANCE OF THEDISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUSINDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS) WILL BE DOCUMENTED AND A PHOTOGRAPH WILL BE TAKEN.2. THE SWPPP WILL BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS TO CORRECT PROBLEMS ORADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,WEATHER, OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TOSURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER.a. THE SWPPP WILL BE AMENDED WHEN INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER, OPERATOR,OR CONTRACTORS OR BY USEPA/MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE INELIMINATING OR MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER;THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES; OR THE SWPPP IS NOTCONSISTENT WITH A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.b. ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION WILL BE DOCUMENTED ASREQUIRED WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS.c. AMENDMENTS WILL BE COMPLETED BY AN APPROPRIATELY TRAINED INDIVIDUAL. CHANGES INVOLVING THEUSE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP WILL INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMPIS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.3. RECORDS RETENTION: THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCERECORDS WILL BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONALCONTROL OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER A FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURINGNORMAL WORKING HOURS.4. RECORD AVAILABILITY: THE PERMITTEES WILL MAKE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING INSPECTION REPORTS,MAINTENANCE RECORDS, AND TRAINING RECORDS, AVAILABLE TO FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL OFFICIALSWITHIN THREE DAYS UPON REQUEST FOR THE DURATION OF THE PERMIT COVERAGE AND FOR THREE YEARSFOLLOWING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION.7.0 POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES:1. ANY CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACHPOLLUTANTS WILL BE STORED UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) TO PREVENTDISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS THROUGH MINIMIZATION OF CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. STORAGE OF SUCHMATERIALS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 12.2)2. PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE STORED UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTICSHEETING, TEMPORARY ROOFS, WITHIN A BUILDING, OR IN WEATHER-PROOF CONTAINERS) TO PREVENTDISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS THROUGH MINIMIZATION OF CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. STORAGE OF SUCHMATERIALS WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 12.3)3. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE (E.G., OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINTSOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, ANDACIDS) WILL BE STORED AND DISPOSED OF IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES CHAPTER 7045, INCLUDINGSECONDARY CONTAINMENT (AS APPLICABLE). HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE PROPERLY STORED IN SEALEDCONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS, OR OTHER DISCHARGES AND PREVENT PRECIPITATION FROM FALLINGONTO THE CONTAINERS OR STORED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.3 AND 12.4)4. SOLID WASTE WILL BE COLLECTED, STORED, AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINNESOTARULES CHAPTER 7035. THIS INCLUDES STORAGE WITHIN COVERED TRASH CONTAINERS AND DAILY REMOVAL OFLITTER AND DEBRIS. STORAGE OF SOLID WASTE WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE MINIMIZED TO THE EXTENTPOSSIBLE. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 12.5)5. PORTABLE TOILETS WILL BE LOCATED AWAY FROM SURFACE WATERS AND POSITIONED AND SECURED TO THEGROUND SO THEY WILL NOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. SANITARY WASTE WILL BE DISPOSED OF INACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, CHAPTER 7041. PORTABLE TOILETS WILL BE PERIODICALLY EMPTIEDAND THE WASTE HAULED OFF-SITE BY A LICENSED HAULER. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 12.6)6. VEHICLE FUELING WILL ONLY OCCUR IN DESIGNATED AREAS. SPILL KITS SIZED APPROPRIATELY FOR THEAMOUNT OF REFUELING TAKING PLACE WILL BE LOCATED. SPILL KITS WILL BE CLEARLY LABELED AND CONTAINMATERIALS TO ASSIST IN SPILL CLEANUP INCLUDING ABSORBENT PADS, BOOMS FOR CONTAINING SPILLS, ANDHEAVY-DUTY PROTECTIVE GLOVES. SPILLS WILL BE REPORTED TO THE MINNESOTA DUTY OFFICER AS REQUIREDBY MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 115.061. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.3 AND 12.7)a. ANY FUEL TANKS BROUGHT ON-SITE WILL HAVE PROPERLY SIZED CONTAINMENT AND WILL NOT BE TOPPEDOFF TO AVOID SPILLS FROM OVERFILLING. FUEL TANKS WILL MEET INDUSTRY STANDARDS (DESIGNED TOHOLD FUEL TYPE, PROPERLY MAINTAINED, NOT ILLEGALLY MODIFIED, NOT MISSING LEAK INDICATORFLOATS FOR DOUBLE WALLED TANKS, SIGHT GAUGES NOT USED, ETC.) OR BE REMOVED FROM THE WORKAREA.b. GUIDELINES FOR SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE INCLUDE:- TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS,INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED,INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE;- PERFORM REGULAR PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE ON TANKS AND FUEL LINES;- INSPECT PUMPS, CYLINDERS, HOSES, VALVES, AND OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON-SITE FORDAMAGE OR DETERIORATION;- DO NOT WASH OR RINSE FUELING AREAS WITH WATER;- MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SUPPLIES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND PROVIDE ANAPPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS;- REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE; AND- MAINTAIN COPIES OF SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDSS) FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ON-SITE INLOCATIONS READILY AVAILABLE TO EMERGENCY RESPONDERS.7. IF VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING IS NECESSARY, A VEHICLE WASH STATION WILL BE LOCATED IN ADESIGNATED AREA. RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA WILL BE CONTAINED IN A SEDIMENT BASIN AND WASTEFROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY WILL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF. ANY SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS WILLBE PROPERLY USED AND STORED. ANY DETERGENTS AND OTHER CLEANERS NOT PERMITTED FOR DISCHARGEWILL NOT BE USED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.3 AND 12.8)8. THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN CONCRETE OR OTHER WASHOUT ACTIVITIES. IF NECESSARY, A DESCRIPTIONOF THE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUT WASTES SO THAT WASTES DO NOTCONTACT THE GROUND WILL BE ADDED. (CSW PERMIT ITEMS 2.3 AND 12.9)8.0 PERMANENT COVER AND PERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS:1. THE AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION WILL BE STABILIZED WITH PERMANENT COVER UPONCOMPLETION OF WORK. PERMANENT COVER MAY BE VEGETATIVE OR NON-VEGETATIVE, AS APPROPRIATE.ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT COVER MAY INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: SEEDING, MULCHING, ANDEROSION CONTROL BLANKETS. (CSW PERMIT ITEM 5.17)2.FOR A CONSTRUCTION-SITE TO ACHIEVE “PERMANENT COVER”, THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MUST BECOMPLETED PRIOR TO TERMINATION OF PERMIT COVERAGE: (CSW PERMIT SECTIONS 4 AND 13)a. ALL SOIL DISTURBING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND PERMANENT COVER HASBEEN INSTALLED OVER ALL AREAS. VEGETATIVE COVER CONSISTS OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIONWITH A DENSITY OF 70% OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THEFUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION (SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASEOF A SAND FILTER).b. ALL SEDIMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING CULVERTS.c. ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE MAY BE LEFT IN PLACE.WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE TERMINATION CONDITIONS ARE COMPLETE, A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) FORM WILLBE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-05_SWPPP.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:03 PMREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP)23101014.04-C-06 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.GOPHER STATE ONE CALL:CALL BEFORE YOU DIG.1-800-252-1166PROJECTLOCATIONPROJECT LOCATIONSCALE IN FEET20,00010,0000CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
ST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-5ST-4PZ-2SB-3SB-2SB-1ST-1SB-5SB-6SB-4ST-7ST-8ST-9750
7
5
0
760 76077077077078078078079079079080080080080080081081081081082082082082083083083083076015+33T0+00T1+00T2+00T3+00T4+00T5+00T6+00T7+00T8+00T9+00T10+00T11+00T12+00T13+00T14+00T15+00T82082
0
830
830818818818818822822
822822824824
824824826826826826
828828828828
832832832832
8348348368368388387607707807
9
0
8
0
0
8
1
0WTWTWTWTWTWTWTWT
WTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWTWT
WT L178158208258308358408458158208258308358408450+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+00 15+32100' VCPVC STA: 2+00.00PVC ELEV: 833.40PVT STA: 3+00.00PVT ELEV: 831.00
100' VCPVC STA: 10+70.00
PVC ELEV: 836.02
PVT STA: 11+70.00
PVT ELEV: 838.92100' VCPVC STA: 6+60.00
PVC ELEV: 818.00
PVT STA: 7+60.00
PVT ELEV: 820.50 100' VCPVC STA: 5+10.00
PVC ELEV: 820.50
PVT STA: 6+10.00
PVT ELEV: 818.00
0.00%0.20%-5.00%5.00%0.79%NEW FENCE,SEEEXISTING TRAILEXI
S
T
I
N
G
C
M
P
FINISHED TRAIL GRADEEXISTING GROUND1-PLAN: TRAIL MODIFICATIONSNSCALE IN FEET1005002-PROFILE: TRAIL MODIFICATIONSHORIZ. SCALE IN FEET100500100CONSERVATION EASEMENT5VERT. SCALE IN FEETEXISTING TRAILCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-07_TRAIL MODIFICATIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:30 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435PROPERTY LINE (TYP)CONSTRUCTION LIMITSSuite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL MODIFICATIONSPLAN AND PROFILE23101014.04-C-07 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.NEW STORM SEWER,SEE SHEET C-19EXISTING NORTH PIPENEW TRAIL,SEENORTH SLOPE REPAIR AREA,SEE SHEET C-17SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLETAND STREAMBANK REPAIR,SEE SHEET C-131C-102C-10NEW DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITH TRM,SEE SHEET C-193C-18CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
FG OFFSET2+007908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET2+507908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET3+007908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET3+507908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET4+007908008108208308407908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET4+507807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET5+007807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET5+507807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET6+007507607707807908008108208308407507607707807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 1600-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET6+507407507607707807908008108208308407407507607707807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET7+007507607707807908008108208308407507607707807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 1500-10-20-30-40-50NOTE:SEE FOR FURTHER DETAILSON TRAIL SECTIONS, INCLUDING 2% CROSSSLOPE ON TRAIL SURFACE.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL MODIFICATIONSCROSS SECTIONS23101014.04-C-08 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-07_TRAIL MODIFICATIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:06 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435FINISHED GRADE (TYP.)EXISTING GROUND (TYP.)3:14:12:12:14%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%2:12:18:18:18:12C-101C-10CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
FG OFFSET7+507707807908008108208308407707807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 1200-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET8+007807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET8+507807908008108208308407807908008108208308400 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET9+007908008108208308408507908008108208308408500 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET9+508008108208308408508008108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET10+008008108208308408508008108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET10+508008108208308408508008108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET11+008108208308408508108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET11+508108208308408508108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50FG OFFSET12+008108208308408508108208308408500 10 20 30 40 500-10-20-30-40-50REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL MODIFICATIONSCROSS SECTIONS23101014.04-C-09 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-07_TRAIL MODIFICATIONS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:07 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435FINISHED GRADE (TYP.)EXISTING GROUND (TYP.)Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354%4%2:14%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%4%2:12:12:14%4%NOTE:SEE FOR FURTHER DETAILSON TRAIL SECTIONS, INCLUDING 2% CROSSSLOPE ON TRAIL SURFACE.2C-101C-10CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-10_TRAIL SECTIONS AND DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:09 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554351-SECTION: TRAIL MODIFICATION (TYPICAL) - STA. 5+00 TO 7+75NOT TO SCALE10' TRAIL5' MIN. SHOULDER5' MIN. SHOULDER4%6" THICK MnDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHED2.0%2H:1V MAX.NORTH SIDE6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.)EXISTING GROUNDTYPE 5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC(AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION)REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRCHANHASSEN, MNTRAIL MODIFICATIONSTYPICAL SECTIONS23101014.04C-10 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.SOUTH SIDE4%2-SECTION: TRAIL MODIFICATION (TYPICAL) - STA. 1+75 TO 5+00 AND STA. 7+75 TO 12+00NOT TO SCALE10' TRAIL5' MIN. SHOULDERVARIES - 5' MIN. SHOULDER4%2.0%NORTH SIDE6" TOPSOIL AND SEED (TYP.)EXISTING GROUNDSOUTH SIDE4%3" THICK 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACINGCLASS SPECIAL(SEE TABLE 1 FOR GRADATION)PREPARE TOP 12" OF SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCEWITH MnDOT STANDARD 2112NOTES:TEST ROLL SUBGRADE PRIOR TO AGGREGATEBASE INSTALLATION IN CONFORMANCE WITHMnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 2111.NOTES:TEST ROLL SUBGRADE PRIOR TO AGGREGATEBASE INSTALLATION IN CONFORMANCE WITHMnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 2111.6" THICK MnDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE, 100% CRUSHEDTYPE 5 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC(AT ENGINEER'S DISCRETION)3" THICK 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACINGCLASS SPECIAL(SEE TABLE 1 FOR GRADATION)3/8" MINUS GRADATION FORAGGREGATE SURFACING(CLASS SPECIAL)SIEVE SIZEPERCENT PASSING3/8"100#470-100#4020-50#20010-30TABLE 11.5'1.5'1.5'1.5'NOTES:1. 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACING SHALL BE100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE.2. 3/8" MINUS AGGREGATE SURFACING MUSTCOME FROM KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS,INC. OF BURNSVILLE, MN., IN ORDER TO MATCHCOLOR OF EXISTING TRAIL.2.0%2.0%PREPARE TOP 12" OF SUBGRADE IN ACCORDANCEWITH MnDOT STANDARD 2112CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
750750 750750760760 760760770770770770770770780780780780780780790790790790790790800800800800800800800800800800810810810810810810810810810810820820820820820820820820830830830830830830830830EXI
S
T
I
N
G
C
M
P5+00T6+00T7+00T8+00T7607607607607707707707707807807807807907907907908008008
0
0
8
0
0
8108108
1
0
8
1
0
820820820820CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-11_SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:33 PM
1-NSCALE IN FEET40200PLAN: SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSuite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRPLAN23101014.04-C-11 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.SOUTH CULVERT OUTLET MODIFICATIONS,SEE SHEET C-13PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITH FLEXIBLECONCRETE GEOGRID, SEE SHEET C-19PROPERTY LINE(TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITSREMOVE EXISTING DAMAGED HEADWALLAND SLIP LINE IN EXISTING CULVERTSEE SHEET C-13FLARED END SECTIONSEE SHEET C-13REALIGNED TRAILTURF REINFORCEMENT MAT(CATEGORY 2)SEECLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2LEGENDRIPRAPTURF REINFORCEMENT MATFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRIDR-041
750755760765770775780785790795800805810815820825830835840750755760765770775780785790795800805810815820825830835840750755760765770775780785790795800805810815820825830835840750755760765770775780785790795800805810815820825830835840CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-11_SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:10 PM
1-SCALE IN FEET40200SECTION: SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSuite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFMTP2BARRMTP2HCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSECTIONS23101014.04-C-12 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.EXISTING CULVERTEXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADEEXISTING DAMAGED HEADWALLC NEW TRAILLC EXISTING TRAILL2-SCALE IN FEET40200SECTION: SOUTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR2H:1V MAX.EXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADEC NEW TRAILLC EXISTING TRAILL0-10-2010 20 30 40 50 60 70 802H:1V MAX.90-30-40100 110 120 130 140 150 160CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
740740740740750750 750750760760760760770770770770780780780780790790800800810810820820830830EX.
C
M
P
A
7
5
0
75076077078079080081082
0
830
7707707807807907908008008108108208208308300+0
0
C
1+
0
0
C2+00C2+37CSTART RIPRAPN: 165126.53E: 562060.20END RIRRAPN: 165112.13E: 561995.35START RIPRAPN: 165070.99E: 561911.86END RIPRAPN: 165026.13E: 561885.99INSTALL RIPRAP STILLING BASIN(BOTTOM EL. 740.85)SEEREMOVE EXISTING DAMAGED HEADWALLSEEPROPERTY LINE(TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITSSLIP LINE EXISTING CULVERTWITH 95" x 67" CMP. INCLUDE 5'MIN. LENGTH INSIDE EXISTINGCULVERT AND 2' MIN. LENGTHOUTSIDE EXISTING CULVERT.SEEINSTALL 95" x 67" FLARED END SECTIONON SLIP-LINED ARCH PIPESEEEXISTING CHANNEL THALWEGPROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITHFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID,SEE SHEET C-19BOULDER CROSS VANESEEBOULDER CROSS VANESEECADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-13_SOUTH CULVERT PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/13/2019 8:41 AM1-SCALE IN FEET40200Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET ANDSTREAMBANK REPAIR PLAN23101014.04-C-13 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.NPLAN: SOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET AND STREAMBANK REPAIR17.5'1C-141C-141C-14INSTALL SALVAGED MnDOT CLASS IV RIPRAPAT SLOPE TOE (24" MIN. DEPTH)SEEINSTALL SALVAGED MnDOT CLASS IVRIPRAP AT SLOPE TOE (24" MIN. DEPTH)SEE1C-16MINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAIL1C-162C-151C-151C-15C-142C-143C-144NOTES:1. START AND END COORDINATES FOR SALVAGED RIPRAP AT SLOPETOE DELINEATE EXTENTS ALONG LENGTH OF CHANNEL. VERIFY ALLLOCATIONS IN THE FIELD WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.2. REMOVE DEBRIS IN CHANNEL AS NECESSARY FOR WORK. DEBRISREMOVAL INCIDENTAL TO SALVAGED RIPRAP INSTALLATION.3. MINOR GRADING MAY BE NECESSARY ON SLOPE ABOVE PLACEDSALVAGED RIPRAP. SLOPE SHALL TIE-IN WITH TOP OF RIPRAP.INCIDENTAL TO RIPRAP PLACEMENT.EXISTING STREAM EXTENTSCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
7407457507557607657407457507557607650+001+002+002+377357407507607357407507600102030400-10-20-30-407307407507607307407507600102030400-10-20-30-40CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-14_SOUTH CULVERT REPAIR DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:20 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..EXISTING 8' SPAN CMPAAPPROX. 25'APPROX. 5'Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET REPAIRPROFILE AND SECTIONS23101014.04-C-14 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.FURNISH AND INSTALL 95" x 67" CMP FOR SLIP LININGEXISTING CULVERT. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZEAND FIT IN THE FIELD AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING.SECTION: CMPA CULVERT SLIP LINE1-EXISTING GROUTEDANNULUS (ASSUMED)ORIGINAL CONCRETECULVERTEXISTING 4" SLOTTED PVCUNDERDRAINEXISTING SAND PACKEXISTING GROUTVERIFICATION PORTORIGINAL CONCRETECULVERTEXISTING GROUTINJECTION PORTEXISTING RIPRAPEXISTING GEOTEXTILEEXISTING TIMBER PILESEXISTING GROUTPLACED IN VOID(FEB., 2016)EXISTING GROUNDREMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE HEADWALLFINISHED GRADE2H:1V MAX.FURNISH AND INSTALL95" x 67" GS PIPE APRON5' MIN.2' MIN.INSTALL 3/4"Ø ASTM F1554, GR36, OR A36 THREADED ROD (GALV.).6" MINIMUM EPOXY GROUT EMBED. (6) EA. ROW, EQUALLY SPACEDAROUND CIRCUMFERENCE. CUT ROD FLUSH WITH NUT.FILL ANNULUS WITH CLSM HIGH DENSITYGROUT PER MnDOT 2519.3.A.2INSTALL 24" OF COARSE FILTERAGGREGATE, MnDOT 3149.2.HTYPE 4 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC87"-5.30%-1.00%PROFILE: CULVERT OUTLET AND STREAM CHANNEL4-HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET40200VERTICAL SCALE IN FEET20100FLARED END SECTION87"2' EXTENSIONEXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADEEL. 752.98EL. 743.85EL. 743.85EL. 740.8530'20'90' (STREAM WIDTH = 30')80' (STREAM WIDTH = 20')30" R270 RIPRAP3'SECTION: STREAM CHANNEL (30' BOTTOM WIDTH)2-SCALE IN FEET20100SECTION: STREAM CHANNEL (20' BOTTOM WIDTH)3-SCALE IN FEET20100EXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADE30'36" R470 RIPRAP30" R270 RIPRAPEXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADE3:13:13:13:112'12'20'12'12'2.5:18:18:18:14'4'12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDING12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDING36" R470 RIPRAP12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDING12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDINGBOULDER CROSS VANEBOULDER CROSS VANECCCC24"PLACE SALVAGED, CLASS III, OR CLASS IV RIPRAP BENEATHFLARED END SECTION AS NEEDED TO FACILITATE COARSEFILTER AGGREGATE PLACEMENT. THIS RIPRAP MATERIAL ANDPLACEMENT IS INCIDENTAL TO FLARED END SECTION.1'-0"2'-0"2'-0"CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
12'30' US VANE,20' DS VANE12'BOULDER ELEVATIONPOINTVARIES - 4' MINB3 GRANULAR BEDDINGOVERFLOW ELEVATION4'-6' AVERAGE DIAMETERFIELDSTONE BOULDERSA-SECTION: BOULDER CROSS VANENOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALEB-SECTION: BOULDER CROSS VANE 3H:1V3H:1VRIPRAP(36" R470 US VANE,30" R270 DS VANE)12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDINGEXISTING SUBGRADENOTES:1. CROSS VANE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY BEMODIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER.2. FINAL BOULDER PLACEMENT TO BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD.CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO ADJUST BOULDER ELEVATIONS AND ROTATION.3. THERE SHALL BE NO GAPS BETWEEN BOULDERS. RIPRAP BEDDING SHALL BEPLACED ON THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE BOULDERS TO PLUG SMALL GAPS (MAYREQUIRE HAND PLACEMENT).4. BOULDERS OF AN UNSUITABLE SHAPE MAY BE RE-LOCATED OR REJECTED.5. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON DISTURBED BANKS.FLOW1-DETAIL: BOULDER CROSS VANE NOT TO SCALE18"12"TOE OF BANKBOULDER ELEVATIONPOINTTOP OF BANK4'-6' AVERAGE DIAMETERFIELDSTONE BOULDERSE312" APPROX.E2E1E3E2RIPRAP(36" R470 US VANE,30" R270 DS VANE)10'10'℄ CHANNEL (THALWEG)A-FLOW30°APPROX 30°APPROX12'30' US VANE20' DS VANE12'-BRIPRAP ANDGRANULAR FILTERTOP OF BANKTOP OF BANK2-7% UPWARD SLOPEE1E24'-6' AVERAGE DIAMETERFIELDSTONE BOULDERS10'10'TOE OF BANKTOE OF BANK2-DETAIL: STILLING BASINNOT TO SCALEPLAN VIEWSECTION VIEW D9'10'9'30'D-1330'3'EXISTING GROUNDSECTION VIEW CC-TIE INTO EXISTINGSTREAM CHANNEL3:1
20'20'3:13:1
3:11%12'20'131%BOTTOM EL. 740.85EL. 743.85EL. 743.8530" R270 RIPRAP12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDING13133'BOTTOM EL. 740.8528'EXISTING GROUND30" R270 RIPRAP12" B3 GRANULAR BEDDINGFLOWFLOWCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-14_SOUTH CULVERT REPAIR DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:55 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSOUTH AREA CULVERT OUTLET REPAIRSECTIONS AND DETAILS23101014.04-C-15 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.BOULDER ELEVATION POINTSELEV. E1 ELEV. E2 ELEV. E3US VANE754.30 750.30 754.30DS VANE747.80 743.80 747.80CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
3' MIN.2.5H
:1VEXCAVATED STREAM BED MATERIAL (COMPACT)8" THICK Mn/DOT GRANULAR FILTER24" THICK SALVAGED RIPRAP(MnDOT CLASS IV)TOPSOIL AND SEEDEXISTING SLOPEFILL WITH EXCAVATEDSTREAM BED MATERIALEXISTING STREAM BED2' MIN.1-DETAIL: RIPRAP TOE PROTECTIONNOT TO SCALEEXISTING TOE OF BANKCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-16_STREAMBANK REPAIR DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 12:56 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTREAMBANK REPAIRDETAIL23101014.04-C-16 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
780780790790800800810810 8108108
2
0
8
2
0 820820830830830830840840840840790790800800810810820820820820820820830830 830830830830840840840840820820830830840840850850860860850850
7907908008002+00N0+00N1+00N13+00T14+00T15+00T15+33T8128128148148168168188208227
8
0
7
9
0
8
0
0
810820PROPOSED STORM SEWERSEECADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-17_NORTH AREA GRADING.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 12:35 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..1-PLAN: NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRNMINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILSCALE IN FEET40200POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTEREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNNORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRPLAN23101014.04-C-17 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.PROPERTY LINEEXISTING WETLANDEXTENTSCONSERVATION EASEMENTBOUNDARYCONSTRUCTION LIMITSPROTECT EXISTING HEADWALLPROPERTY LINEPROTECT EXISTING FENCEFILL EXISTING 18" DIP WITH GROUTAND ABANDON IN PLACE,SEE C-181C-18INSTALL NEW CHAINLINK FENCESEECRUSHED VIRGIN CLASS III RIPRAP1C-193C-182C-18EXISTING I.E. 810.9(VERIFY IN FIELD PRIOR TODOWNSTREAM GRADING)FILL AREA TO EL. 810.9(COMMON EMBANKMENT)POTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTECLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
7727757807857907958008058108158208258308358408457727757807857907958008058108158208258308358408450+000+200+400+600+801+001+201+401+601+802+00FINAL GRADECONCRETE FOOTING (TYP.)3-DETAIL: WIRE FENCE DESIGN VINYL COATED6'-0"3'-0"NOT TO SCALE6" TYP.2'-6"
3"10'-0" MAX.CENTER TO CENTER12"END POST/PULL POST1 2LINE POST 1 3TOP RAIL 1 4 7CHAIN LINK FABRIC 1 6BOTTOM RAIL 1 4 74'-6"
3"ALTERNATE LINEPOST ANCHORAGENOTES:1.100% BONDED VINYL COATED - "BLACK", GALVANIZED 6GAGE.2.TERMINAL POSTS 9' END, CORNER OF PULL POST - 3" O.D.BLACK PIPE.3.LINE POSTS 9' x 2-1/2" SS 40.4.TOP RAIL SHALL BE 1-5/8" SS 30.5.ALL FITTING, TIES, LOOP CAPS, AND COMPONENT PARTSSHALL BE VINYL COATED "BLACK".6.CHAIN LINK FABRIC SHALL BE 2" MESH WITH KNUCKLEDSELVAGE TOP AND BOTTOM.7.FABRIC SHALL BE TIED BELOW TOP RAIL EVERY 12".8.FENCE SHALL BE GROUNDED.9.FENCE ALIGNMENT SHALL BE OFFSET 4' FROM EDGE OFTRAIL.10.REVIEW FENCE ALIGNMENT/EXTENTS WITH ENGINEERPRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ENGINEER MAY ALTER FENCEALINGMENT/EXTENTS.78079080081078079080081001020300-10-20-30EXISTING GROUNDCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-18_NORTH AREA REPAIR DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 1:05 PMGGN M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_Drawing_N2-OPT2_NORTH AREA - STORM SEWER PLAN & PROFILE.dwg Plot at 0 04/06/2016 16:05:35.Xrefs in Drawing - M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_BASE_EXISTING-IMAGE.dwg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_BASE_EXISTING-Planimetric.dwg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_Base-Design-Planimetric.dwg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_BASE_Borings(Carver County Coord).dwg
1-PROFILE: NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRSCALE IN FEET10020REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNNORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIRPROFILE, SECTION, AND DETAIL23101014.04-C-18 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.ABANDON EXISTING 18" DIP INPLACE WITH FLOWABLE FILLGROUTPROTECT EXISTINGHEADWALL1.5:1
CRUSHED VIRGIN CLASS III RIPRAPEXISTINGPROPERTYLINECAP EXISTING 18" DIPPLUG WITH MANUFACTURED PLUG OR CAP SPECIFICALLYDESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED TO BE USED WITH TYPEOF PIPE (18" DIP) BEING ABANDONED OR BULKHEAD ENDWITH CEMENT GROUT PRIOR TO ABANDONING PIPE WITHFLOWABLE FILL.5'2-SECTION: NORTH AREA SLOPE REPAIR (STA. 0+43)SCALE IN FEET10020EXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADECRUSHED VIRGIN CLASS III RIPRAPNNNNNNNNNNNFINISHED GRADEFINISHED GRADEEL. 810.9FILL AREA (COMMON EMBANKMENT)CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
9+15S0+00S1+00S2+00S3+00S4+00S5+00S6+00S7+00S8+00S9+00S820820818818822822812812812812814814814814816816816816750750 750750760760 770770780780790790800800800800810810820820820820830830830830800800
810810
820820
83
0
83
0
830830830830
840840
8108108208208308308408408508508608608
2
0
8
2
0 830830830830840840840840750750760760 770770 780780790790800800810810760760770770
7
8
0
7
8
0
7
9
0
7
9
0
8008008108108108108208208
1
0
8
1
0
8
0
8
8
0
8
812812812812ST-3ST-6PZ-1ST-1SB-5SB-6ST-7ST-8ST-97357407457507557607657707757807857907958008058108158208258308358408457357407457507557607657707757807857907958008058108158208258308358408450+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+158.49%17.00%PVI STA = -0+09.59PVI EL = 752.00PVI STA = 1+65.28PVI EL = 766.84
PVI STA = 3+42.73
PVI EL = 797.01
PVI STA = 4+72.41
PVI EL = 805.896.84%REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEAS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELPLAN AND PROFILE23101014.04-C-19 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-19_STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/13/2019 12:46 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..Suite 2004300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55435EXISTING CMPA
1-NSCALE IN FEET60300CONSTRUCTION LIMITSSOUTH SLOPE REPAIRSEE SHEET C-11MINNESOTA BLUFFS LRT REGIONAL TRAILCONSERVATION EASEMENTTRAIL MODIFICATIONSSEE SHEET C-07PLAN: STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELBEATRICE I.ZWIERSONIRREV. TRUSTPARCEL LINEEXISTING FIBER OPTIC LINE2-HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET60300PROFILE: STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELVERTICAL SCALE IN FEET30150EXISTING GROUNDFINISHED GRADEPROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNELSEE1C-2124" HDPE STORM SEWER -DIRECTIONAL DRILLED302 LF - 24" HDPE @ 1.57%(INSTALL USING DIRECTIONALDRILLING METHODS)24" CAS PIPE APRON(IE. 810.50)24" CAS PIPE APRON2.5:1RIPRAP STILLING BASINPROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANNEL WITHFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRIDSEE1C-21ROCK CHECK (TYP.)SEE2C-20RIPRAP STILLING BASINSEE1C-2024" CAS PIPE APRON(IE. 805.75)ROCK CHECK (TYP.)SPACED APPROX.EVERY 50'FILL AREA TO 810.9FILL AREAEL. 810.900.61%NOTES:1. INSTALL 24" HDPE AND NEW CHANNEL PRIOR TO PLUGGINGEXISTING NORTH 18" UNDER TRAIL EMBANKMENT.2. ENSURE VEGETATION IS AT LEAST 70% ESTABLISHED IN NEWCHANNEL PRIOR TO ALLOWING FLOW.3. INTLALL SEED , BLANKET, AND MULCH ONCE PROJECTDISTURBANCE IS COMPLETE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHRESTORATION DESIGN/SPECIFICATIONS.24" CAS PIPE APRONSSSSSSSSSS SFINISHED GRADEPOTENTIAL ACCESS ROUTEST-3ST-6ST-7ST-8ST-9CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2ROCKCHECKSTATIONROCK CHECKTOP ELEV.10+27756.3020+82760.9731+39765.8041+96743.6352+52783.1563+09792.8473+62799.5584+13802.92
DIA.L41411-FLARED END SECTIONFLOWE 2'NOTES:PIPE SIZES LARGER THAN THOSE SHOWN REQUIRE ASPECIAL DESIGN.REQUIREMENTS FOR RIPRAP SIZE AND THICKNESS ANDFILTER BLANKET SHALL BE DESIGNATED IN THE PLANS.1.FOR PIPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 30", USE 1.5'.2.DIMENSION E IS GIVEN ON STANDARD PLATES 3100 AND3110.SECTION: RIPRAP OUTFALL-RIPRAP1'B-AMnDOT GRANULARFILTER MATERIAL1RIPRAPMnDOT GRANULARFILTER MATERIAL1'12'A--B--SECTION: RIPRAP OUTFALLNOT TO SCALEDETAIL: RIPRAP OUTFALLNOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALETABLE OF QUANTITIESRIPRAP AT PIPE OUTLETSCLASS IId50 = 6"CLASS IIId50 = 9"CLASS IVd50 = 12"DIA. OFROUNDPIPE (IN.)L(FT.)12" DEPTHRIPRAP(CU. YD.)6" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER(CU. YD.)18" DEPTHRIPRAP(CU. YD.)9" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER(CU. YD.)24" DEPTHRIPRAP(CU. YD.)12" DEPTHGRANULARFILTER(CU. YD.)24125.52.88.34.211.05.52'2'2MnDOT CLASS IV RANDOMRIPRAP AND MnDOTGRANULAR FILTERCLASS IV RIPRAP6'10'36"2:1
2
:
1 2:12:1CLASS IV RIPRAPFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID(FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)DETAIL: ROCK CHECKNOT TO SCALEA-SECTION: ROCK CHECK NOT TO SCALE6'12"B-SECTION: ROCK CHECK NOT TO SCALEFLOWFLOWCLASS IV RIPRAPB-24"OVERFLOWELEVATION5'-2A-FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID(FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)12"2'NOTES:1.CUT FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID AT EACH ROCK CHECKAS NECESSARY TO IMPROVE GEOGRID FLEXIBILITY ANDFORM TRENCH FOR ROCK CHECK.2.PROVIDE MINIMUM OF 3-FT. OVERLAP OF GEOGRID ATBREAK BELOW ROCK CHECK WITH UPSTREAM GEOGRIDLAYER PLACED ON TOP OF DOWNSTREAM GEOGRID.3.VERIFY INSTALLATION AND REQUIRED STAKING WITHMANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.PROVIDE MIN. 3-FT. OVERLAPAT BREAK BELOW ROCK CHECKCULVERT INVERTREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELSECTIONS AND DETAILS23101014.04-C-20 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-20_STORM SEWER DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/13/2019 9:00 AMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
10'4'2'4'2'2'SLOPE AND WIDTH VARY1-SECTION: DRAINAGE CHANNEL NOT TO SCALESEE DETAIL 2 FOR KEY6" MIN. TOPSOIL WITH SEED ANDCATEGORY 3 EROSION CONTROLBLANKET. EXTEND EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET 10' MIN. FROMEDGE OF FLEXIBLE CONCRETEGEOGRID.FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRIDNOTES:1.ALL FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID TO BE FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL.2.FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID IS TO BE LAID IN A SHINGLED MANNER SO THE UPSTREAM ROW IS LAIDOVER THE TOP OF THE DOWNSTREAM ROW AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'SGUIDELINES.3.FOR GENERAL INSTALLATION INFORMATION SEE DETAIL 2.4.PLACE TOPSOIL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID AND GRADE TO BESMOOTH PER MANUFACTURER GUIDELINES.216" MIN. TOPSOIL AND SEED BELOWFLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRIDCADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_C-20_STORM SEWER DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 3:27 PMBAR M:\AutoCAD 2011\AutoCAD 2011 Support\enu\Template\Barr_2011_Template.dwt Plot at 1 10/05/2010 14:03:50..REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSTORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE CHANNELSECTIONS AND DETAILS23101014.04-C-21 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.DETAIL: FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID INSTALLATION (FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)NOT TO SCALE-2CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
750750750750760760 760760770770 770770780780780780780780 780780790790790790790790800800800800800800800800810810810810810810
8108108
2
0
8
2
0
82
0
82
0 820820820820820820820820830830830830830830
830830830830830830 830830840840840840CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_R-01_RESTORATION PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 3:21 PM CONSTRUCTION LIMITSMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAIL1-PLAN: SEEDING NSCALE IN FEET120600WOODLAND EDGE SOUTH SEED MIX(MnDOT 36-211)SYMBOL AND PATTERN LEGEND580578CONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING 10' CONTOUREXISTING 2' CONTOURRESTORATION NOTES:1. ALL GROUND DISTURBANCE GENERATED FROM GRADING ACTIVITIESSHALL BE DECOMPACTED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12", STABILIZED ANDRESTORED WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SEED WITH COVERCROP, AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR STRAW MULCH. THETOPSOIL USED FOR RESTORATION MAY BE STOCKPILED FROM GRADINGAREAS.2. SEED ANY DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WITHTHE SPECIFIED SEED MIX.3. ANY EXOTIC INVASIVE PLANTS AND WEEDS WITHIN THE SEEDING AREASSHALL BE SPRAYED WITH HERBICIDE 14 DAYS PRIOR TO SEEDING.SIGNAGE INDICATING THE USE OF HERBICIDES MUST BE POSTED ON SITE.4. ALL HERBICIDE APPLICATION SHALL BE APPLIED BY A LICENSEDAPPLICATOR WITHIN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.5. SEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS. SEEDING IS TO TAKEPLACE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINAL GRADING AND SOIL PLACEMENTTO PREVENT EROSION AND COMPACTION.6. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. IN THE CASEOF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THIS DETAIL, PLANS, ORSPECIFICATIONS, THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL GOVERN.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNSEEDING PLAN23101014.04-R-01 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.NATIVE CONSTRUCTION SEED MIX(MnDOT 32-241)REALIGNED GRAVEL TRAILSTORMWATER SOUTH SEED MIX(MnDOT 33-261)WET PRAIRIE SEED MIX(MnDOT 34-262)RIPRAPPROPOSED TRAILCLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2CLEARING LIMITS
750750750750760760 760760770770 770770780780780780780780780780780780 7807807
9
0
7
9
0 7907907907907907907907907907908
0
0
8
0
0 8008008008008008008008008
0
0
8
0
0
8
1
0
8
1
0 8108108108108108108108108108108208208208208208208
2
0
8
2
0 8208208208208208208208208308308308308308308308308308308
3
0
8
3
0 83083084084084084084084084
0
84
0
840840
8508508
5
0
8
5
0
850850860860
86086086
0
86
0
870870
870870870870
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_R-02_PLANTING PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 1:46 PM CONSTRUCTION LIMITSMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAIL1-PLAN: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MULCH PLAN NRIPRAPSYMBOL AND PATTERN LEGEND580578CONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING 10' CONTOUREXISTING 2' CONTOURREVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNEROSION CONTROL BLANKET ANDMULCH PLAN23101014.04-R-02 A..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.REALIGNED GRAVEL TRAILSCALE IN FEET120600CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION12/13/19----------------------------------A B C 0 1 2 3FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID(FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)EROSION CONTROL BLANKET(MnDOT CAT. 3N)DISK ANCHORED MULCHCLEARING LIMITSCLEARING LIMITS
750750750750760760 760760770770 770770780780780780780780780780780780 7807807
9
0
7
9
0 7907907907907907907907907907908
0
0
8
0
0 8008008008008008008008008
0
0
8
0
0
8
1
0
8
1
0 8108108108108108108108108108108208208208208208208
2
0
8
2
0 8208208208208208208208208308308308308308308308308308308
3
0
8
3
0 83083084084084084084084084
0
84
0
840840
8508508
5
0
8
5
0
850850860860
86086086
0
86
0
870870
870870870870
CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_R-02_PLANTING PLAN.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/12/2019 1:52 PM CONSTRUCTION LIMITSMINNESOTA BLUFF LRT REGIONAL TRAIL1-PLAN: EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AND TREE PLANTING PLAN NRIPRAPSYMBOL AND PATTERN LEGEND580578CONSTRUCTION LIMITSEXISTING 10' CONTOUREXISTING 2' CONTOURNOTES:1. ALL TREES GREATER THAN 6" DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT REMOVED DURINGCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED AT A 1:1 RATIO.2. ESTIMATED TREE REPLACEMENT QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED IN THE TREEPLANTING SCHEDULE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES.3. ACTUAL TREE REPLACEMENT QUANTITY WILL VARY FROM THE PLANTINGSCHEDULE BASED ON NUMBER AND SPECIES OF TREES REMOVED DURINGCONSTRUCTION.4. BOTH CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER SHALL KEEP A LOG OF ALL TREES GREATERTHAN 6" DIAMETER AT BREAST HEIGHT REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION TODETERMINE TREES TO BE PLANTED.5. APPROXIMATE AREAS FOR TREE PLANTING ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN VIEW. FIELDSTAKE LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED TREES IN THE FIELD FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLANTING.REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNTREE PLANTING PLAN23101014.04-R-03 A..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.REALIGNED GRAVEL TRAILSCALE IN FEET120600CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION12/13/19----------------------------------A B C 0 1 2 3Common NameBotanic NameSizeSpacing (ft)Replacement% of TotalRemovedQuantity(Estimated)IronwoodOstrya virginiana #10 Cont. 10 O.C.4%TBDDowny ServiceberryAmelanchier arborea#10 Cont. 10 O.C.3%TBDAmerican LindenTilia americana#10 Cont. 15 O.C.8%TBDNorthern Pin OakQuercus ellipsoidalis#10 Cont. 15 O.C.3%TBDSugar MapleAcer saccharum#10 Cont. 15 O.C.50%TBDRed OakQuercus rubra#10 Cont. 15 O.C.3%TBDHackberryCeltis occidentalis#10 Cont. 10 O.C.10%TBDNorthern Strain RedbudCercis canadensis#10 Cont. 15 O.C.2%TBDSwamp White OakQuercus bicolor#10 Cont. 15 O.C.3%TBDBlack CherryPrunus serotina#10 Cont. 10 O.C.4%TBDCottonwoodPopulus deltoides#10 Cont. 15 O.C.10%TBDTotalTBD2-TABLE: ESTIMATED TREE PLANTING SCHEDULETREE PLANTING NOTES:1. REMOVE DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES.RETAIN THE NATURAL FORM OF PLANT. DO NOTCUT THE LEADER2. IF ROOT FLARE IS NOT EXPOSED WITHIN THECONTAINER EXCAVATE SURFACE SOIL TO BASEOF ROOT FLARE.3. DIG PLANT HOLES 6" MIN. LARGER THAN ROOTMASS, ALL SIDES.4. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIORTO PLANTING5. SET TREE ON LIGHTLY FIRMED BACKFILL SOILSO ROOT FLARE IS EVEN WITH FINISH GRADE.6. BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL AND FIRM SOILAROUND ROOT MASS TO MAINTAIN PLUMB ANDENSURE NO AIR GAPS AROUND ROOT MASS.7. CONSTRUCT 3" WATERING BASIN. THOROUGHLYWATER WITHIN 3 HOURS OF INSTALLATION.8. PLACE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (MN/DOTSPEC 3882.2 TYPE 6 - WEED SEED FREESHREDDED HARDWOOD.) TO A RADIUS OF 24"AND TO A DEPTH OF 3" AROUND TREE (SOILPREPARED AS PER PLAN).9. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH BASE OFPLANT.10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD.11. CONTRACTOR TO WATER AS NECESSARYTHROUGHOUT GUARANTEE PERIOD TOMAINTAIN IN A HEALTHY CONDITION. AT THEEND OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD ALL TREESTHAT ARE DEAD OR DETERMINED UNHEALTHYOR UNSIGHTLY SHALL BE REPLACED ATCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.DETAIL: TREE PLANTING3-NOT TO SCALETREE PER SCHEDULE3" SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH(INCIDENTAL TO TREEINSTALLATION)BACKFILL SOILEXISTING SUBGRADEFINISH GRADETYP.ROOT FLARE, TO BE AT GRADEAND NOT COVERED WITH MULCHOR SOULPRUNE AND REMOVEADVANTAGEOUS AND FIBROUSROOTS ABOVE ROOT FLARE24" MIN.FLEXIBLE CONCRETE GEOGRID(FLEXAMAT OR APPROVED EQUAL)TREE PLANTING AREACLEARING LIMITSCLEARING LIMITS
12"12"CHECK SLOT NOTES:1. SECURE AT 12 IN. INTERVALS, BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL.2. CHECK SLOTS TO BE PLACE EVERY 25' ALONG FLOW LINE.WATER FLOWANCHOR TRENCH NOTES:1. SECURE AT 12 IN. INTERVALS, BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL.2. FOR SLOPES, CONSTRUCT TOP ANCHOR TRENCH 2 FT. BEYOND CREST OFSLOPE.30" MIN.12"12"INTERMITTENT CHECK SLOTTOP ANCHOR TRENCHTRM ANCHOR PATTERNWATER FLOW2 FT.2 FT.
4 FT.ANCHOR NOTES:1. PLACE ANCHORS ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE PATTERN.2. OVERLAP BETWEEN ROLLS IS 6 IN. MINIMUM.3. SPLICE BETWEEN ROLLS IS 18 IN. MINIMUM4. ALWAYS INSTALL DOUBLE ROW OF PINS SPACED 12" APART AT ALL ROLLSPLICES.5. INSTALL PINS DOWN THE CENTER OF EACH MAT STAGGERING THE OUTSIDEPINS.6. ANCHORS SHALL BE AT MINIMUM 12 IN. STEEL NAILS WITH 1-1/2 IN.WASHERS OR 12 IN. U-SHAPED WIRE STAPLES. LONGER ANCHORS MAY BEREQUIRED FOR LOOSE SOILS. ANCHORS MUST PROVIDE SUFFICIENTGROUND PENETRATION TO RESIST PULLOUT.ANCHORS (TYP)TRM INSTALLATION NOTES:1. PLACE A MINIMUM OF 4 IN. OF TOPSOIL ON SLOPE.2. PLACE APPROXIMATELY 50% OF THE SPECIFIED SEED AND RAKE SEED INTO SOIL PRIORTO PLACEMENT OF TRM.3. INSTALL AND ANCHOR TRM AS SHOWN AND AS SPECIFIED.4. PLACE ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL (PULVERIZED, DRY, LOOSE) OVER TRM ROUGHLY 1 IN. THICKOR UNTIL THE TRM IS BARELY VISIBLE.5. APPLY REMAINING 50% OF SEEDING ON TOP OF SOIL FILLED TRM AND LIGHTLY RAKE INTOSOIL USING THE FLAT SIDE OF A RAKE.6. HYDROMULCH MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE APPROACH IN STEP 5.TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT(TRM)TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT(TRM)ANCHORANCHORS (TYP)NOT TO SCALEDETAIL: TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT-1NOTE:1. SECURE AT 12 IN. INTERVALS, BACKFILL AND COMPACT SOILEDGE TERMINATION ANCHOR TRENCHWATER FLOW12"12"ANCHORS (TYP.)TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM)REVISION DESCRIPTIONDATEAPP.BYNO. CHK.TO/FORRELEASEDDATE RELEASEDApprovedDesignedDrawnCheckedDateScaleDWG. No.BARR PROJECT No.CLIENT PROJECT No.REV. No.Minneapolis, MinnesotaPh: 1-800-632-2277Corporate Headquarters:DATELICENSE #SIGNATUREI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ORREPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.BARR ENGINEERING CO.Project Office:PRINTED NAMEPh: 1-800-632-2277MINNEAPOLIS, MN 554354300 MARKETPOINTE DRIVEFax: (952) 832-2601www.barr.comSuite 200AS SHOWN12/13/2019EPFAKHBARRAKHHCRRAMINNEAPOLIS, MNLANDSLIDE REPAIRSCHANHASSEN, MNRESTORATION DETAILS23101014.04-R-04 D..90% DESIGNNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.CADD USER: Eric P. Fitzgerald FILE: M:\DESIGN\23101014.04\2310101404_R-04_RESTORATION DETAILS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:2 PLOT DATE: 12/11/2019 1:46 PMrlg M:\Design\23101014.00\2310101400_Drawing_D 4_Erosion Control Details.dwg Plot at 0 12/21/2015 16:08:36..CLIENTBIDCONSTRUCTION03/07/1904/19/1910/09/1912/13/19-------------------------------A B C D 0 1 2
APPENDIX C
Threatened and Endangered Species Review Memorandum
Barr Engineering Co. 4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com
Technical Memorandum
To: File
From: Tyler Conley
Subject: Threatened and Endangered Species Review
Date: 12/05/2019
Project: Chanhassen Slope Failure Project
Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) has completed a threatened and endangered species desktop review for the
Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRRA) Slope Failure Project. The project area consists of
9.58 acres centered on the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail. Located within the City of
Chanhassen and City of Eden Prairie Minnesota, Section 23, T116W, R23N.
Federally listed species are protected by the federal government under the Endangered Species Act and
require consideration for projects involving federal permits. State listed species are protected under
Minnesota’s Endangered and Threatened Species Law and must be considered for state level permitting
requirements. The project area was reviewed for federal and state listed species and their associated
habitats that may be found in the project area. This desktop review was completed in November 2019
using a combination of data available from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR).
1.1 Federally listed species
The USFWS Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC) identified two federally listed species
as occurring within the project area, the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis; federally
threatened) and the Rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis; federally endangered). No designated
critical habitat for any federally listed species is located within the project area.
The northern long-eared bat inhabits caves, mines, and forests. According to the MNDNR, the nearest
hibernacula is over 6.7 miles southwest of the project area, and no maternity roost trees have been
identified within the vicinity of the project area. To minimize the potential impact on the species tree
clearing will be conducted between November 1 and March 31. Therefore, project clearing activites
completed prior to April 1, 2020 are anticipated to have no effect on northern long-eared bat.
Rusty patched bumble bees are typically found in grasslands with flowering plants from April through
October. They are typically nesting in underground and abandoned rodent cavities or clumps of grasses
above ground as nesting sites. During the winter months, queens typically overwinter in underground
cavities in upland forests dominated by maple-basswood or oak-hickory trees. The project area is
located within USFWS designated High Potentail Zone for the rusty patched bumble bee. The USFWS
Section 7 guidance recommends USFWS consultation for projects located within the High Potential zone.
To: File
From: Tyler Conley
Subject: Threatened and Endangered Species Review
Date: 12/05/2019
Page: 2
\\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\10\23101014 Landslides in Chanhassen HCRRA\_04 Chanhassen Slope Failure Const Plans\WorkFiles\Permitting\Wetland\Appendix C
TE\ChanhasssenTE Memo technicalV3.docx
1.2 State-listed species
Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) has a license agreement (LA-898) with the MNDNR for access to the Natural
Heritage Information System (NHIS) database, which was queried in November 2019 to determine if any
rare species could potentially be affected by the proposed Project. Two state-listed species have been
previously recorded within the project area; American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius), and smooth rock
cress (Boechera laevigata). In addition, the NHIS database identified five, state-endangered, threatened,
special concern or watchlist species have been documented within one mile of the proposed project area
(Table 1). Five native plant communities were also noted.
Table 1 Rare Species Documented within One Mile of Proposed Project Area According to
MNDNR NHIS
Common Name Scientific Name
Federal
Status State Status Habitat1
Kitten-tails Besseya bullii N/A Threatened
Primarily found in oak savanna communities, though it occurs in dry prairies and oak woodlands. Plants show a preference for partial to open light and upper slopes. Some populations exhibit a preference for less xeric north facing slopes in prairie habitats. Soils are most often sandy to gravelly, well-drained soil derived from alluvium or limestone.
Smooth Rock Cress Boechera laevigata N/A Special concern Found to occur on slopes in mesic deciduous forests.
Lark Sparrow Chondestes grammacus N/A Special concern Typically in dry short prairie grasslands in areas with sand or gravel spoils with some
bare ground and scattered trees.
American Ginseng Panax quinquefolius None Special concern Typically found in well-developed forest soil, mesic loamy soil.
Gophersnake Pituophis catenifer None Special concern Prefers well-drained, loose sandy and gravel soils.
1: Habitat information obtained from MDNR Rare Species Guide: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/index.html
Kitten tails is the only state listed threatened species identified within one mile of the project area. Primary
habitat for the species consists of oak savanna communities on north facing slopes. No such habitat is
present within the project area. The majority of the project area is densely wooded deciduous forest with
a southeast facing slope. No dry prairie is present. Therefore it is unlikely for the species to be located
within the project area. The remaining state listed species are listed as species of special concern. These
species are monitored by the DNR but are not protected under state law.
APPENDIX D
SHPO Historical/Architectural Resource CR-CHC-049
Memorandum
Technical Memorandum
To: Jessica Galatz
From: Joel Swenson
Subject: SHPO Historical/Architectural Resource CR-CHC-049
Date: 09/15/2015
Project: 23101014.00/004-100
c: Kristin Alstadt
As part of finalizing Task 2 and moving into final design, Task 3, the HCRRA (Hennepin County Regional
Rail Authority) and the Barr design team needed to understand the existence and extents of any wetlands
or fens within HCRRA right-of-way. This would include anything that would impact the design option
selected by HCRRA. A preliminary desktop review of the site was performed by Barr staff in February,
2015. A complete wetland delineation was recently performed June 17, 2015. A report summarizing the
preliminary and final wetland delineation findings was submitted to the HCRRA in July.
In addition to the wetland delineation, the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Office was contacted
by Barr staff to perform a database search for potential historical and archaeological resources within this
area of Section 25 and 36, of Township 116, Range 23 in the City of Chanhassen within Carver County.
According to the SHPO database, a historic feature (CR-CHC-049) is placed south of the landslide as
shown on Figure 1 (also attached).
Figure 1. Historical/Architectural resource database results
To: Jessica Galatz
From: Joel Swenson
Subject: SHPO Historical/Architectural Resource CR-CHC-049
Date: 09/15/2015
Page: 2
P:\Mpls\23 MN\10\23101014 Landslides in Chanhassen HCRRA\WorkFiles\Wetland Evaluation\SHPO\Technical Memorandum_SHPO.docx
The Historic feature is listed as a house (highlighted in yellow in Figure 2).
Figure 2. Historical/Architectural Inventory
To further investigate the potential for cultural resources within the project area or vicinity, Barr staff
scheduled a visit to the SHPO office to pull the file for this Inventory Number CR-CHC-049. Upon arriving
at the office, it was determined that a file had not been created for this inventory number as of the
afternoon of July 10, 2015. Julie Hillenbrand (a grant process facilitator at SHPO) left a voicemail with Barr
staff KNA the next morning on July 11, 2015 stating that their independent contractor who they hire to
create the files has not provided them with any documentation for this inventory number. Julie and Tom
Cinadr (property information/database searches at SHPO) both indicated that they had no idea when they
expected to receive files for this inventory number.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Resolution 2020XX: Providing for the Sale of up to $7,000,000 General Obligation Utility
Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A for various City 2020 and 2021 Utility System Improvements.
Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4.
Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:
PROPOSED MOTION
Approval of Resolution providing for the Sale of up to $7,000,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series
2020A for various City 2020 and 2021 Utility System Improvements.
Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.
BACKGROUND
As part of the rate study discussion staff and Ehler's discussed the use of Bonding for some significant utility
improvements related to the TH101 project and the Minnewashta Parkway Road project. The bonding was
incorporated into the study for the past couple of years and no change in the rates was required in order to bond for
these projects.
City staff will undergo a rating by Standard & Poors in late February to affirm the city's triple A bond rating. The
bonds will be awarded at the March 9th city council meeting and the bond proceeds will be used starting at the end of
March.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of Resolution providing for the Sale of up to $7,000,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series
2020A for various City 2020 and 2021 Utility System Improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
Pre Sale Report
Resolution No. 2020-___
Councilmember _________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
Resolution Providing for the Sale of
$6,795,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it
is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $6,795,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds,
Series 2020A (the "Bonds"), to finance various 2020 and 2021 utility system improvement projects in
the City; and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its
independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60,
Subdivision 2(9);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the City for the sale of
the Bonds.
2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on March 9, 2020, for the
purpose of considering proposals for, and awarding the sale of, the Bonds.
3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby
authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the
Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by City Council Member
_______________________ and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following City Council Members voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Dated this 10th day of February, 2020.
_____________________________________________
City Manager
February 10, 2020
Pre -Sale Report for
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
$6,795,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds,
Series 2020A
Prepared by:
Nick Anhut, CIPMA
Senior Municipal Advisor
Bruce Kimmel, CIPMA
Senior Municipal Advisor
Presale Report
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
February 10, 2020
Page 1
Executive Summary of Proposed Debt
Proposed Issue: $6,795,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A (the “Bonds”)
Purposes: The proposed issue includes fixed-rate, tax-exempt financing for the various utility
system improvement projects identified within the City’s capital improvement plan.
Inclusive of estimated financing costs, the Bonds are sized as follows:
• $4,700,000 for water system improvements. Debt service will be paid from net
revenues of the water fund collected from 2020 to 2030.
• $715,000 for sanitary sewer system improvements. Debt service will be paid from net
revenues of the sanitary sewer fund collected from 2020 to 2029.
• $1,380,000 storm water system improvements. Debt service will be paid from net
revenues of the storm water fund collected from 2020 to 2029.
Authority: The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit and taxing
powers are pledged. The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters
444 & 475.
Chapter 444 allows cities to issue debt without limitation as long as debt service is
expected to be paid from water, sewer and storm water revenues.
Term/Call Feature: The Bonds are being issued for a term of 10 years, 10 months in total. Principal on the
Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2021 through 2031. Interest is payable every
six months beginning February 1, 2021.
The Bonds will be subject to prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2027
or any date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest.
Bank Qualification: Because the City is expecting to issue no more than $10,000,000 in tax exempt debt
during the calendar year, the City will be able to designate the Bonds as “bank qualified”
obligations. Bank qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds, which can result in
lower interest rates.
Rating: The City’s most recent bond issues were rated by Standard & Poor’s. The current ratings
on those bonds are “AAA”. The City will request a new rating for the Bonds.
Method of
Sale/Placement:
We will solicit competitive bids for the purchase of the Bonds from underwriters and
banks. We will include an allowance for discount bidding in the terms of the issue. The
discount is treated as an interest item and provides the underwriter with all or a portion of
their compensation in the transaction.
If the Bonds are purchased at a price greater than the minimum bid amount (maximum
discount), the unused allowance may be used to reduce the final borrowing amount.
Premium Pricing: In some cases, investors in municipal bonds prefer “premium” pricing structures. A
premium is achieved when the coupon for any maturity (the interest rate paid by the
issuer) exceeds the yield to the investor, resulting in a price paid that is greater than the
Presale Report
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
February 10, 2020
Page 2
face value of the bonds. The sum of the amounts paid in excess of face value is considered
“reoffering premium.” The underwriter of the bonds will retain a portion of this reoffering
premium as their compensation (or “discount”) and pay the remainder to the City as
additional net proceeds for the projects.
The amount of the premium varies, but it is not uncommon to see premiums for new
issues in the range of 2.00% to 10.00% of the face amount of the issue. This means that
an issuer with a $6,000,000 offering may receive bids that result in proceeds of
$6,120,000 to $6,600,000.
The amount of premium can be restricted in the bid specifications. Be advised that
restrictions on premium may result in fewer bids, but may also eliminate large
adjustments on the day of sale and unintended impacts with respect to debt service
payments. Ehlers will identify appropriate bidding parameters for the Bonds intended to
achieve the City’s objectives for available funds to construct the utility system projects.
Review of Existing
Debt:
We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness for the City and find that there are no
viable refunding opportunities to consider at this time. We will continue to monitor the
market and the call dates for the City’s outstanding debt and will alert you to any future
refunding opportunities as they arise.
Continuing
Disclosure:
The City will be agreeing to provide certain updated Annual Financial Information and
its Audited Financial Statement annually, as well as providing notices of the occurrence
of certain reportable events to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”),
as required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The City is already obligated to provide such reports for its existing bonds, and has
contracted with Ehlers to prepare and file the reports.
Arbitrage Monitoring: Because the Bonds tax-exempt obligations, the City must ensure compliance with certain
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules throughout the life of the issue. These rules apply
to all gross proceeds of the issue, including initial bond proceeds and investment earnings
in construction, escrow, debt service, and any reserve funds. How issuers spend bond
proceeds and how they track interest earnings on funds (arbitrage/yield restriction
compliance) are common subjects of IRS inquiries. Your specific responsibilities will be
detailed in the Arbitrage Certificate prepared by your Bond Attorney and provided at
closing. You have retained Ehlers to assist you with compliance with these rules.
Two-Year Spending Exception (24-month) – The City expects to meet the two-year
expenditure exception for the construction of its utility projects. If the City fails to meet
the exception, it will rebate any arbitrage earnings subject to the regulations.
Risk Factors: Utility Revenues: The City expects to pay debt service of the Bonds with utility funds.
If utility revenue is inadequate in the future, the City may have to use general funds or
levy taxes to provide for all or a portion of the debt service shortfall.
Other Service
Providers:
This debt issuance will require the engagement of other public finance service
providers. This section identifies those other service providers so Ehlers can coordinate
their engagement on your behalf. Fees charged by these service providers will be paid
from proceeds of the Bonds unless you notify us that you wish to pay them from other
Presale Report
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
February 10, 2020
Page 3
sources. Our pre-sale bond sizing includes a good faith estimate of these fees, but final
fees may vary. If you have any questions pertaining to the service providers or their
role, or if you would like to use a different service provider for any of the listed services
please contact us.
Bond Counsel: Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP (formerly Briggs & Morgan)
Paying Agent: Bond Trust Services Corporation
Rating Agency: S&P Global Ratings (S&P)
Basis for
Recommendation:
Based on the City’s objectives, project funding requirements, our advisory relationship
and characteristics of various municipal financing options, we are recommending the
issuance of General Obligation Bonds as a suitable option to finance the planned utility
projects because:
• The issuance is consistent with the City’s practices for financing these types of
projects and is structured to fit within its long-term financial plans, including its ten-
year Utility Rate Study updated in December, 2019.
• The General Obligation pledge will result in lower interest rates than other financing
options available.
• The expectation this form of financing will also meet the City’s objectives for term,
structure and optional redemption.
• The method of sale process identified herein complies with City policy as well as best
practices endorsed by the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA).
Summary: The decisions to be made by the City Council regarding this report are as follows:
• Accept or modify the finance assumptions described in this report
• Consider the resolution giving preliminary approval to issue the Bonds
This presale report summarizes our understanding of the City’s objectives for the structure and terms of this
financing as of this date. As additional facts become known or capital markets conditions change, we may need
to modify the structure and/or terms of this financing to achieve results consistent with the City’s objectives.
Presale Report
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
February 10, 2020
Page 4
Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule
Pre-Sale Review by City Council: February 10, 2020
Due Diligence Call to review Official Statement: Week of February 17, 2020
Conference with Rating Agency: Week of February 17, 2020
Distribute Official Statement: Week of February 24, 2020
City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds: March 9, 2020
Estimated Closing Date: April 2, 2020
Attachments
Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds
Estimated Proposed Debt Service Schedule
Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed With Bonds Sale
Ehlers Contacts
Municipal Advisors: Nick Anhut (651) 697-8507
Bruce Kimmel (651) 697-8572
Disclosure Coordinator: Silvia Johnson (651) 697-8580
Financial Analyst: Alicia Gage (651) 697-8551
The Preliminary Official Statement for this financing will be sent to the City Council at their home or email
address for review prior to the sale date.
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
$6,795,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A
Issue Summary
Assumes Current Market BQ "AAA" Rates plus 25bps
Total Issue Sources And Uses
Dated 04/02/2020 | Delivered 04/02/2020
Water Sewer Storm Water
Issue
Summary
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $4,700,000.00 $715,000.00 $1,380,000.00 $6,795,000.00
Total Sources $4,700,000.00 $715,000.00 $1,380,000.00 $6,795,000.00
Uses Of Funds
Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000%)47,000.00 7,150.00 13,800.00 67,950.00
Costs of Issuance 51,184.70 7,786.60 15,028.70 74,000.00
Deposit to Project Construction Fund 4,600,000.00 700,000.00 1,350,000.00 6,650,000.00
Rounding Amount 1,815.30 63.40 1,171.30 3,050.00
Total Uses $4,700,000.00 $715,000.00 $1,380,000.00 $6,795,000.00
Series 2020 GO Util Bonds | Issue Summary | 2/ 3/2020 | 11:42 AM
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
$6,795,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A
Issue Summary
Assumes Current Market BQ "AAA" Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
04/02/2020 -----
02/01/2021 205,000.00 1.250%83,385.69 288,385.69 288,385.69
08/01/2021 --48,917.50 48,917.50 -
02/01/2022 640,000.00 1.250%48,917.50 688,917.50 737,835.00
08/01/2022 --44,917.50 44,917.50 -
02/01/2023 650,000.00 1.300%44,917.50 694,917.50 739,835.00
08/01/2023 --40,692.50 40,692.50 -
02/01/2024 660,000.00 1.300%40,692.50 700,692.50 741,385.00
08/01/2024 --36,402.50 36,402.50 -
02/01/2025 665,000.00 1.350%36,402.50 701,402.50 737,805.00
08/01/2025 --31,913.75 31,913.75 -
02/01/2026 675,000.00 1.400%31,913.75 706,913.75 738,827.50
08/01/2026 --27,188.75 27,188.75 -
02/01/2027 680,000.00 1.450%27,188.75 707,188.75 734,377.50
08/01/2027 --22,258.75 22,258.75 -
02/01/2028 695,000.00 1.550%22,258.75 717,258.75 739,517.50
08/01/2028 --16,872.50 16,872.50 -
02/01/2029 705,000.00 1.600%16,872.50 721,872.50 738,745.00
08/01/2029 --11,232.50 11,232.50 -
02/01/2030 715,000.00 1.800%11,232.50 726,232.50 737,465.00
08/01/2030 --4,797.50 4,797.50 -
02/01/2031 505,000.00 1.900%4,797.50 509,797.50 514,595.00
Total $6,795,000.00 -$653,773.19 $7,448,773.19 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $41,668.63
Average Life 6.132 Years
Average Coupon 1.5689819%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.7320542%
True Interest Cost (TIC)1.7387736%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.5646343%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.9311239%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 1.5689819%
Weighted Average Maturity 6.132 Years
Series 2020 GO Util Bonds | Issue Summary | 2/ 3/2020 | 11:42 AM
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
$4,700,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A
Water
Assumes Current Market BQ "AAA" Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
04/02/2020 -----
02/01/2021 --58,504.33 58,504.33 58,504.33
08/01/2021 --35,220.00 35,220.00 -
02/01/2022 440,000.00 1.250%35,220.00 475,220.00 510,440.00
08/01/2022 --32,470.00 32,470.00 -
02/01/2023 445,000.00 1.300%32,470.00 477,470.00 509,940.00
08/01/2023 --29,577.50 29,577.50 -
02/01/2024 455,000.00 1.300%29,577.50 484,577.50 514,155.00
08/01/2024 --26,620.00 26,620.00 -
02/01/2025 460,000.00 1.350%26,620.00 486,620.00 513,240.00
08/01/2025 --23,515.00 23,515.00 -
02/01/2026 465,000.00 1.400%23,515.00 488,515.00 512,030.00
08/01/2026 --20,260.00 20,260.00 -
02/01/2027 470,000.00 1.450%20,260.00 490,260.00 510,520.00
08/01/2027 --16,852.50 16,852.50 -
02/01/2028 480,000.00 1.550%16,852.50 496,852.50 513,705.00
08/01/2028 --13,132.50 13,132.50 -
02/01/2029 485,000.00 1.600%13,132.50 498,132.50 511,265.00
08/01/2029 --9,252.50 9,252.50 -
02/01/2030 495,000.00 1.800%9,252.50 504,252.50 513,505.00
08/01/2030 --4,797.50 4,797.50 -
02/01/2031 505,000.00 1.900%4,797.50 509,797.50 514,595.00
Total $4,700,000.00 -$481,899.33 $5,181,899.33 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $30,328.61
Average Life 6.453 Years
Average Coupon 1.5889265%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.7438957%
True Interest Cost (TIC)1.7502125%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.5646343%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.9333409%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 1.5889265%
Weighted Average Maturity 6.453 Years
Series 2020 GO Util Bonds | Water | 2/ 3/2020 | 11:42 AM
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
$715,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A
Sewer
Assumes Current Market BQ "AAA" Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
04/02/2020 -----
02/01/2021 70,000.00 1.250%8,490.35 78,490.35 78,490.35
08/01/2021 --4,673.75 4,673.75 -
02/01/2022 70,000.00 1.250%4,673.75 74,673.75 79,347.50
08/01/2022 --4,236.25 4,236.25 -
02/01/2023 70,000.00 1.300%4,236.25 74,236.25 78,472.50
08/01/2023 --3,781.25 3,781.25 -
02/01/2024 70,000.00 1.300%3,781.25 73,781.25 77,562.50
08/01/2024 --3,326.25 3,326.25 -
02/01/2025 70,000.00 1.350%3,326.25 73,326.25 76,652.50
08/01/2025 --2,853.75 2,853.75 -
02/01/2026 70,000.00 1.400%2,853.75 72,853.75 75,707.50
08/01/2026 --2,363.75 2,363.75 -
02/01/2027 70,000.00 1.450%2,363.75 72,363.75 74,727.50
08/01/2027 --1,856.25 1,856.25 -
02/01/2028 75,000.00 1.550%1,856.25 76,856.25 78,712.50
08/01/2028 --1,275.00 1,275.00 -
02/01/2029 75,000.00 1.600%1,275.00 76,275.00 77,550.00
08/01/2029 --675.00 675.00 -
02/01/2030 75,000.00 1.800%675.00 75,675.00 76,350.00
Total $715,000.00 -$58,572.85 $773,572.85 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $3,863.85
Average Life 5.404 Years
Average Coupon 1.5159204%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.7009692%
True Interest Cost (TIC)1.7089457%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.5646343%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.9261900%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 1.5159204%
Weighted Average Maturity 5.404 Years
Series 2020 GO Util Bonds | Sewer | 2/ 3/2020 | 11:42 AM
City of Chanhassen, Minnesota
$1,380,000 General Obligation Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2020A
Storm Water
Assumes Current Market BQ "AAA" Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
04/02/2020 -----
02/01/2021 135,000.00 1.250%16,391.01 151,391.01 151,391.01
08/01/2021 --9,023.75 9,023.75 -
02/01/2022 130,000.00 1.250%9,023.75 139,023.75 148,047.50
08/01/2022 --8,211.25 8,211.25 -
02/01/2023 135,000.00 1.300%8,211.25 143,211.25 151,422.50
08/01/2023 --7,333.75 7,333.75 -
02/01/2024 135,000.00 1.300%7,333.75 142,333.75 149,667.50
08/01/2024 --6,456.25 6,456.25 -
02/01/2025 135,000.00 1.350%6,456.25 141,456.25 147,912.50
08/01/2025 --5,545.00 5,545.00 -
02/01/2026 140,000.00 1.400%5,545.00 145,545.00 151,090.00
08/01/2026 --4,565.00 4,565.00 -
02/01/2027 140,000.00 1.450%4,565.00 144,565.00 149,130.00
08/01/2027 --3,550.00 3,550.00 -
02/01/2028 140,000.00 1.550%3,550.00 143,550.00 147,100.00
08/01/2028 --2,465.00 2,465.00 -
02/01/2029 145,000.00 1.600%2,465.00 147,465.00 149,930.00
08/01/2029 --1,305.00 1,305.00 -
02/01/2030 145,000.00 1.800%1,305.00 146,305.00 147,610.00
Total $1,380,000.00 -$113,301.01 $1,493,301.01 -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars $7,476.17
Average Life 5.418 Years
Average Coupon 1.5154960%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)1.7000826%
True Interest Cost (TIC)1.7080438%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 1.5646343%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC)1.9247322%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 1.5154960%
Weighted Average Maturity 5.418 Years
Series 2020 GO Util Bonds | Storm Water | 2/ 3/2020 | 11:42 AM
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Resolution 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Approve Plans and Specifications; Authorize Ad
for Bids
Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5.
Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002
PROPOSED MOTION
“The City Council adopts a resolution approving the plans and specifications in addition to authorizing publication of
an advertisement for bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Project No. 2002.”
Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.
BACKGROUND
On October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) for
consultant services for the project.
On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professional
services for the Minnewashta Parkway project.
On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates and
authorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.
On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study for the project and called a public hearing.
On October 28, 2019, the City Council authorized preparation of plans and specifications.
On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.
DISCUSSION
Minnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between TH 5 and TH 7.
The roadway and some of the utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's Capital Improvement Plan for 2020
includes funding for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020 and 2021. The limits of the project are from
just south of Highway 7 on the north end of the project to just south of West 77th Street on the south end of the
project.
The City has reviewed and commented on several sets of draft plans prepared by the consultant. Staff has had several
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Minnewashta Parkway Approve Plans and Specifications; Authorize Adfor BidsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 202002PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution approving the plans and specifications in addition to authorizing publication ofan advertisement for bids for the Minnewashta Parkway Project No. 2002.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with KimleyHorn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study for the project and called a public hearing.On October 28, 2019, the City Council authorized preparation of plans and specifications.On January 13, 2020, the City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria.DISCUSSIONMinnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between TH 5 and TH 7. The roadway and some of the utilities are in need of rehabilitation. The City's Capital Improvement Plan for 2020includes funding for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020 and 2021. The limits of the project are fromjust south of Highway 7 on the north end of the project to just south of West 77th Street on the south end of theproject.
The City has reviewed and commented on several sets of draft plans prepared by the consultant. Staff has had several
design meetings with the consultant and worked with them to prepare a final set of plans. The consultant prepared a
warrant analysis for a temporary signal for construction at the TH5 and Minnewashta Parkway intersection. This
analysis was submitted to MnDOT and they concurred a temporary signal was warranted during construction. The
project phasing is set up for this to be needed in 2021.
KimleyHorn has submitted the plan set to MnDOT's StateAid division for their review due to the City designating
this section of roadway as a MSA route in the past and the plan to utilize MSA funding to pay for some of the
roadway improvements. Any modifications required by StateAid will be made by the consultant and the project will
be ready to be advertised for bidding.
The current cost estimate for the project including a 10% construction cost contingency and consulting fees is tracking
under the budget established in the feasibility study.
The current schedule for this project is as follows:
Task Date
Bid Opening March 6, 2020
Neighborhood Meeting March, 2020
Assessment Hearing; Award Contract April 13, 2020
Start Construction May, 2020
Substantial Completion October, 2021
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council approve the plans and specifications prepared by KimleyHorn. In addition, staff
recommends the City Council authorize the publication of the advertisement for bids.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
2020 CIP Sheet
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: February 10, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY
STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT NO. 20-02
WHEREAS, pursuant to the resolution passed by the City Council on October 28, 2019,
Kimley-Horn and the City Engineer have prepared plans and specifications for the Minnewashta
Parkway Street Rehabilitation Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the
Council for approval; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which can be reviewed at the office of the City
Engineer, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official city newspaper and on
QuestCDN.com, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such
approved plans and specifications. The ad shall be published at least three times, shall specify
the work to be done, shall state that bids will be opened on March 6, 2020, and the
responsibility of the bidders will be considered by the Council at 7:00 PM on Monday, April
13, 2020, for the Minnewashta Parkway Street Rehabilitation Project No. 20-02, in the Council
Chambers at the City Hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration
of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No
bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a bid
security payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of February, 2020.
ATTEST:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Well #4 Roof Repair
Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6.
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public Works
Director/City Engineer
File No: PW064
PROPOSED MOTION
“The City Council awards the roof repair project for the building housing Well #4 and Lake Susan Park restrooms to
Walker Roofing in the amount of $37,565.00.”
Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.
SUMMARY
The existing building located in Lake Susan Park serves multiple purposes including housing for Well #4, restrooms,
and shelter for picnic tables. The existing roof is beyond its useful life and needs replacement.
DISCUSSION
Per the City's Purchasing Policy, quotes were received from two contractors. Both quotes covered the same general
scope.
Walker Roofing $34,150
Sela Roofing $58,600
Both proposals listed additional costs for roof decking repair on a time and materials basis. Due to the unknown
condition of the wood decking, we propose to budget an additional 10% of the proposal price for unforeseen decking
replacement. This results in a nottoexceed price of $37,565, which is within our 2020 CIP Budget of $39,000.
Funding would be split 50/50 between the Water Utility Fund and the Capital Replacement Equipment Fund.
Walker Roofing has successfully performed roofing work for the City previously.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends awarding the roof repair project for Well #4/Lake Susan Park Restrooms to Walker Roofing.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectWell #4 Roof RepairSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6.Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public WorksDirector/City Engineer File No: PW064PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council awards the roof repair project for the building housing Well #4 and Lake Susan Park restrooms toWalker Roofing in the amount of $37,565.00.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe existing building located in Lake Susan Park serves multiple purposes including housing for Well #4, restrooms,and shelter for picnic tables. The existing roof is beyond its useful life and needs replacement.DISCUSSIONPer the City's Purchasing Policy, quotes were received from two contractors. Both quotes covered the same generalscope.Walker Roofing $34,150Sela Roofing $58,600Both proposals listed additional costs for roof decking repair on a time and materials basis. Due to the unknowncondition of the wood decking, we propose to budget an additional 10% of the proposal price for unforeseen deckingreplacement. This results in a nottoexceed price of $37,565, which is within our 2020 CIP Budget of $39,000.Funding would be split 50/50 between the Water Utility Fund and the Capital Replacement Equipment Fund.Walker Roofing has successfully performed roofing work for the City previously.RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends awarding the roof repair project for Well #4/Lake Susan Park Restrooms to Walker Roofing.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contractor Quotes
CIP Sheet
Capital Improvement Program
City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Charlie Howley
2020 2024thru
Department Water System Improvements
Description
The roof of the structure housing well #4 is leaking and in need of replacement. The multi-use structure is shared by the Parks and Utility
departments. It houses bathrooms for Lake Ann Park and a drinking water fountain for public use in addition to serving as the well house for deep
well #4. The roofline also shelters a rental pavilion.
Project #W-064
Priority n/a
Justification
The existing roofing material is 39 year old wood shakes. The roof will be replaced with a pre-finished standing seam steel roof.
Budget Impact/Other
UsefulLifeProjectNameWell #4 Re-roofing Project Category Utilities
Type Maintenance
Account #2
Account #1 700-7025-4706
Total Project Cost:$39,000
Account #4
Account #3
Total20202021202220232024Expenditures
39,00039,000Construction
39,000 39,000Total
Total20202021202220232024FundingSources
19,50019,500CapitalReplacement
Equipment Fund
19,50019,500WaterUtilityFund
39,000 39,000Total
113
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Highway 101 RPBCWD Maintenance Agreement
Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.7.
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Director of Public
Works/City Engineer
File No: ENG 1408
PROPOSED MOTION
“The City Council authorizes execution of a Maintenance Agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek
Watershed District for the purposes of perpetual obligation to maintain wetland and creek buffers and stormwater
facilities.”
Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.
DISCUSSION
This agreement is a condition of Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed Districe (RPBCWD) Permit 2019042 and
memorializes the longterm maintenance of the projects wetland and creek buffers and stormwater facilities. The
agreement has been reviewed by both City and District staff and their representative engineering consultants. The
District will consider this same agreement after the City takes action.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approving the execution of this agreement with RPBCWD.
ATTACHMENTS:
Agreement
1
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
Between the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
This Maintenance Agreement (Agreement) is made by and between the Riley Purgatory
Bluff Creek Watershed District, a watershed district with purposes and powers set forth
at Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B and 103D (RPBCWD), and the City of Chanhassen,
a statutory city and body corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota (City).
Recitals and Statement of Purpose
WHEREAS pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 103D.345, the RPBCWD has
adopted and implements the Wetland and Creek Buffers Rule, the Waterbody Crossings
and Structures Rule and the Stormwater Management Rule;
WHEREAS under the Wetland and Creek Buffers Rule, certain land development
activity triggers the requirement that the landowner record a declaration establishing
the landowner’s perpetual obligation to protect undisturbed buffer adjacent to a creek
or wetland;
WHEREAS under the Stormwater Management Rule, certain land development
activity triggers the requirement that the landowner record a declaration establishing
the landowner’s perpetual obligation to inspect and maintain stormwater-management
facilities;
WHEREAS in each case, a public landowner, as an alternative to a recorded
instrument, may meet the maintenance requirement by documenting its obligations in
an unrecorded written agreement with the RPBCWD;
WHEREAS in accordance with the RPBCWD rules and as a condition of permit
2019-042, the City’s perpetual obligation to maintain wetland and creek buffer and
stormwater facilities must be memorialized in a maintenance agreement specifying
requirements and restrictions;
WHEREAS City and the RPBCWD execute this Agreement to fulfill the condition of
permit no. 2019-042, and concur that it is binding and rests on mutual valuable
consideration;
2
THEREFORE, City and RPBCWD agree as follows that City, at its cost, will inspect
and maintain the wetland and creek buffer and stormwater facilities as shown in the
site plan attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit A in perpetuity as
follows:
1. BUFFER AREAS
a. Buffer vegetation must not be cultivated, cropped, pastured, mowed,
fertilized, subject to the placement of mulch or yard waste, or
otherwise disturbed, except for periodic cutting or burning that
promotes the health of the buffer, actions to address disease or
invasive species, mowing for purposes of public safety, temporary
disturbance for placement or repair of buried utilities, or other actions
to maintain or improve buffer quality and performance, each as
approved by the District in advance in writing or when implemented
pursuant to a written maintenance plan approved by the District.
b. Diseased, noxious, invasive or otherwise hazardous trees or
vegetation may be selectively removed from buffer areas and trees
may be selectively pruned to maintain health.
c. Pesticides and herbicides may be used in accordance with Minnesota
Department of Agriculture rules and guidelines.
d. No fill, debris or other material will be placed within a buffer.
e. No structure or impervious cover (hard surface) may be created within
a buffer area beyond that shown in the scaled site plan attached to
this declaration as Exhibit A (SHEETS 366-429).
f. Permanent wetland buffer markers will be maintained in the locations
shown on the approved site plan attached as Exhibit A (SHEETS 126,
366-429). Language shall indicate the purpose of the buffer,
restrictions, and the name and website address of the Riley Purgatory
Bluff Creek Watershed District.
3
2. STORMWATER FACILITIES
a. Filtration basins. Filtration basins (BRAMBLE FILTRATION BASIN, PCH
FILTRATION BASIN) will be inspected annually to ensure continued live
storage capacity at or above the design volume. Invasive vegetation, excess
sediment and debris will be removed as needed and healthy plant growth will
be maintained to ensure that the facilities continue to perform per design.
b. Stormwater pretreatment and treatment basin(s). Stormwater pretreatment
and treatment basin(s) (BRAMBLE PRETREATMENT BASIN, PCH
PRETREATMENT BASIN) must be inspected at least once a year to determine if
the basin’s retention and treatment characteristics are adequate and
continue to perform per design. Culverts and outfall structures must be
inspected at least annually and kept clear of any obstructions or sediment
accumulation. Sediment accumulation must be measured by a method
accurate to within one vertical foot. A basin will be considered inadequate if
sediment has decreased the sediment storage volume by 50 percent of its
original design volume. Based on this inspection, if a basin is identified for
sediment cleanout, the basin will be restored to its original design contours
and vegetation in disturbed areas restored within one year of the inspection
date.
c. Sump catch basins. Sump catch basins (STRUCTURE 105 - SHEET 248,
STRUCTURE 198 - SHEET 249) will be inspected in the spring, summer and
fall of each year. Sediment and debris will be removed as needed such that
the stormwater facilities operate as designed and permitted.
3. Reporting. City will submit to the RPBCWD annually a brief written report that
describes stormwater facility maintenance activities performed under this
declaration, including dates, locations of inspections and the maintenance
activities performed.
4. Property Transfer. If City conveys into private ownership a fee interest in the
property that is the subject of this Agreement, it shall require as a condition of
sale, and enforce: (a) that the purchaser record a declaration on the property
incorporating the maintenance requirements of this Agreement; and (b) that
recordation occur either before any other encumbrance is recorded on the
property or, if after, only as accompanied by a subordination and consent
executed by the encumbrance holder ensuring that the declaration will run with
the land in perpetuity. If City conveys into public ownership a fee interest in any
4
property that has become subject to this Agreement, it shall require as a
condition of the purchase and sale agreement that the purchaser accept an
assignment of all obligations vested under this Agreement.
5. This Agreement may be amended only in a writing signed by the parties.
6. The recitals are incorporated as a part of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.
RILEY PURGATORY BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
By ___________________________________ Date: _________________________
President, Board of Managers
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
By: _______________________________ Date: _________________________
Its ____________________________
By: _______________________________ Date: _________________________
Its ____________________________
Bluff
Creek
CHANHASSEN
LOCATION MAP
PLAN
ALIGNMENT
PLAN SET SCALES
PROFILE
CROSS-SECTIONSMAGNETIC SHEET INDEX
THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 450 SHEETS
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER COUNTY
DESCRIPTION
COVER SHEET
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
GENERAL NOTES, STANDARD PLATES, AND UTILITY CONTACTS
TABULATIONS
TYPICAL SECTIONS
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
CONSTRUCTION PHASING AND DETOUR PLANS
ALIGNMENT PLANS AND TABULATIONS
INPLACE CONDITIONS PLANS
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLANS
EROSION CONTROL PLANS
REMOVAL PLANS
CSAH 101 CONSTRUCTION PLANS
CSAH 101 ROADWAY PROFILES
STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND PROFILES
SUPERELEVATION PLANS
INTERSECTION DETAILS
STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES
STORM SEWER LATERAL PROFILES
GRADING PLANS
WATER MAIN PLAN AND PROFILES
SANITARY SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES
STREET LIGHTING PLANS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND FIBER OPTIC PLANS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK FLASHER SYSTEM PLANS
RETAINING WALL PLANS
BOX CULVERT PLANS
SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS
LANDSCAPING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
CROSS SECTIONS
BRIDGE NO. 10555 PLANS
BRIDGE NO. R0827 PLANS
SHEET NO.
1
2 - 5
6
7 - 16
17 - 26
27 - 40
41 - 88
89 - 104
105 - 123
124 - 126
127 - 151
152 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 208
209 - 213
214 - 225
226 - 240
241 - 246
247 - 251
252 - 266
267 - 278
279 - 285
286 - 295
296 - 301
302 - 307
308 - 316
317 - 361
362 - 386
387 - 429
B1 - B11
S1 - S10
AAAAAAAACITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
BRAMBLE POND O.C.S. DETAILS
AAAACITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
PCH POND O.C.S. DETAILS
CITY OF CHANHASSENCSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTSPIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DRSTORM WATERPOLLUTION PREVENTION PLANS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
PCH POND GRADING
GRADING PLANS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
BRAMBLE POND
GRADING PLANS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
BRAMBLE POND
SECTION DETAIL
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
PCH POND
SECTION DETAILS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 52+00 TO STA. 59+00
38 - GLS
28 - GLS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 59+00 TO STA. 65+00
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 65+00 TO STA. 71+00
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 71+00 TO STA. 78+00
CITY OF CHANHASSENCSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTSPIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DRCSAH 101LANDSCAPING ANDTURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANSSTA. 78+00 TO STA. 84+50
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 84+50 TO STA. 91+50
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 91+50 TO STA. 96+50
CITY OF CHANHASSENCSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTSPIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DRCSAH 101LANDSCAPING ANDTURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANSSTA. 96+50 TO STA. 103+00
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 103+00 TO STA. 110+00
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 110+00 TO STA. 118+00
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 61
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 62+00 TO STA. 69+00
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 61
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 69+00 TO STA. 75+50
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
CSAH 61
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 75+50 TO STA. 84+36
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
OLD CSAH 101
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
BLUFF TRAIL
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 199+97 TO STA. 204+50
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
BLUFF TRAIL
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
STA. 204+50 TO STA. 210+50
CITY OF CHANHASSENCSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTSPIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DRCREEKWOOD DRLANDSCAPING ANDTURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANSSTA. 151+00 TO STA. 156+50
CITY OF CHANHASSENCSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTSPIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DRCREEKWOOD DRLANDSCAPING ANDTURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANSSTA. 156+50 TO STA. 162+50
CITY OF CHANHASSENCSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTSPIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DRLAKOTA CONNECTIONLANDSCAPING ANDTURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
PCH POND AREA
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CSAH 101 IMPROVEMENTS
PIONEER TR TO FLYING CLOUD DR
BRAMBLE POND AREA
LANDSCAPING AND
TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Stormwater Pond Phosphorous Remediation Study
Section VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Item No: E.1.
Prepared By Charlie Howley, Public Works
Director/City Engineer
File No: SWMP032
SUMMARY
Dr. Claire Bleser, District Administrator for RileyPurgatoryBluff Creek Watershed District, will give an update on the
status of the University of Minnesota's Stormwater Pond Phosphorous Remediation Study.
Chanhassen has agreed to partner in this study for one of our ponds, Pond BCP4.10C located in Power Hill Park,
along with four other communities within the RPBCWD. Our financial commitment is approximately $3,000 per year
over threeyears, plus inkind labor for distribution of the iron filing material over the pond surface. The funding will
come from our Surface Water Utility Fund.
BACKGROUND
The proposed project will (1) investigate the internal phosphorus release in select stormwater ponds located in the
RileyPurgatoryBluff Creek Watershed District (RPCWD) (pretreatment study), and (2) implement an iron filings
treatment in selected ponds and assess the phosphorus water quality in the ponds (posttreatment study).
The pretreatment study will measure the sediment phosphorus release using laboratory testing of pond sediment
water columns, and monitor the insitu water quality in the ponds. If internal loading is substantial in the ponds, the
results will be utilized to chemicallyinactivate the pond sediment phosphorus using iron filings, and then monitor the
water quality in the ponds to assess the treatment effectiveness.
The overall goal is to mitigate phosphorus pollution from stormwater ponds, and eventually minimize negative impacts
on the downstream water quality.
ATTACHMENTS:
Cost Participation Table
Project Map
Sampling location
In situ monitoring method
BC-P4.10C, Chanhassen
Continuous monitoring station
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Resolution 2020XX: Adoption of 2040 Comprehensive Plan
Section OLD BUSINESS Item No: F.1.
Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No:
PROPOSED MOTION
The City Council approves the resolution adopting the City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.
SUMMARY
Minnesota law requires communities within the sevencounty metropolitan area to create and adopt a comprehensive plan and grants the Metropolitan
Council the authority to review and approve municipal comprehensive plans. Comprehensive plans span a twentyyear period and cities are required to
update them every ten years. Staff started the process of creating the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in 2017.
In many ways, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is a continuation of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan with no substantive changes proposed to the city’s
land use plan and minor updates to the city’s goals and policies. Most of the changes between these comprehensive plans are the result of new or
revised requirements from the Metropolitan Council. A draft comprehensive plan was presented to City Council on December 10, 2018 and City
Council authorized staff to submit the draft to the Metropolitan Council for review.
During their review of the city’s draft comprehensive plan, the Metropolitan Council required that the city make several revisions, include supplemental
information, and clarify several sections. A timeline of the comprehensive planning process and a discussion of the differences between the draft
comprehensive plan and the current version is provided below.
On January 22, 2020, the Metropolitan Council found that the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements;
conforms to the regional system plans including transportation, aviation, water resources management, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040;
and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions.
In addition to the Advisory Comments and Review Record, the Council adopted the following recommendations:
1. Authorize the City of Chanhassen to put its 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect.
2. Revise the city's forecasts upward as shown in Table 1 of the attached Review Record. (Note that the Metropolitan Council is revising their
forecasts to be consistent with the city’s forecast.)
3. Revise the city's sewerserviced forecasts upward as shown in Table 2 of the attached Review Record. (Note that the Metropolitan Council is
revising its forecasts to be consistent with the city’s forecast.)
4. Advise the city to implement the advisory comments noted in the Review Record for Surface Water Management.
5. Approve the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Sewer Plan.
6. Implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Wastewater.
The city may now adopt the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and put it into effect.
BACKGROUND
Timeline:
January 2017 Staff began drafting 2040 Comprehensive Plan Elements
February 23, 2017 Water Management Plan Open House
March 7, 2017 Water Management Plan Open House
April 4, 2017 Planning Commission Work Session
April 10, 2017 City Council Works Session
April 18, 2017 Planning Commission (Sewer, Transportation, and Water)
July 2017 Comprehensive Plan Articles in the “The Connection”
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Adoption of 2040 Comprehensive PlanSectionOLD BUSINESS Item No: F.1.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No: PROPOSED MOTIONThe City Council approves the resolution adopting the City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan.Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.SUMMARYMinnesota law requires communities within the sevencounty metropolitan area to create and adopt a comprehensive plan and grants the MetropolitanCouncil the authority to review and approve municipal comprehensive plans. Comprehensive plans span a twentyyear period and cities are required toupdate them every ten years. Staff started the process of creating the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in 2017.In many ways, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is a continuation of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan with no substantive changes proposed to the city’sland use plan and minor updates to the city’s goals and policies. Most of the changes between these comprehensive plans are the result of new orrevised requirements from the Metropolitan Council. A draft comprehensive plan was presented to City Council on December 10, 2018 and CityCouncil authorized staff to submit the draft to the Metropolitan Council for review.During their review of the city’s draft comprehensive plan, the Metropolitan Council required that the city make several revisions, include supplementalinformation, and clarify several sections. A timeline of the comprehensive planning process and a discussion of the differences between the draftcomprehensive plan and the current version is provided below.On January 22, 2020, the Metropolitan Council found that the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements;conforms to the regional system plans including transportation, aviation, water resources management, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040;and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions.In addition to the Advisory Comments and Review Record, the Council adopted the following recommendations:1. Authorize the City of Chanhassen to put its 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect.2. Revise the city's forecasts upward as shown in Table 1 of the attached Review Record. (Note that the Metropolitan Council is revising theirforecasts to be consistent with the city’s forecast.)3. Revise the city's sewerserviced forecasts upward as shown in Table 2 of the attached Review Record. (Note that the Metropolitan Council isrevising its forecasts to be consistent with the city’s forecast.)4. Advise the city to implement the advisory comments noted in the Review Record for Surface Water Management.5. Approve the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Sewer Plan.6. Implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Wastewater.The city may now adopt the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and put it into effect.BACKGROUNDTimeline:January 2017 Staff began drafting 2040 Comprehensive Plan ElementsFebruary 23, 2017 Water Management Plan Open HouseMarch 7, 2017 Water Management Plan Open HouseApril 4, 2017 Planning Commission Work Session
April 10, 2017 City Council Works Session
April 18, 2017 Planning Commission (Sewer, Transportation, and Water)
July 2017 Comprehensive Plan Articles in the “The Connection”
July 3, 2017 4thof July Comprehensive Plan Outreach
July 18, 2017 Planning Commission (Housing, Land Use, Sewer, Water, and Parks)
August 1, 2017 National Night Out Comprehensive Plan Outreach
August 1, 2017 Planning Commission (Natural Resources)
August 15, 2017 Planning Commission (Water Resources)
September 13, 2017 Comprehensive Plan Open House
September 14, 2017 Comprehensive Plan Open House
October 3, 2017 Planning Commission (Surface Water, Goal & Policies, Implementation, and CIP)
October 17, 2017 Planning Commission Public Hearing on Draft Plan
October 23, 2017 City Council Authorization of Jurisdictional Review/Metropolitan Council submittal for preliminary review
February 2, 2018 Interim status Metropolitan Council preliminary review comments received
February 3, 2018 Feb Fest Comprehensive Plan Outreach
February 20, 2018 Metropolitan Council preliminary review comments addressed
March 2018 Revise 2040 Comprehensive Plan to address jurisdictional comments
April 3, 2018 Planning Commission reviews jurisdictional comments and Plan revisions
July 3, 2018 Watersheds review and approve Local Water Management Plan
July 17, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing on Revisions and Adoption Recommendation
July 23, 2018 City Council Work Session on jurisdiction comments and revisions
August 13, 2018 City Council review of Comprehensive Plan
September 24, 2018 City Council review of revisions based on City Council comments
November 1, 2018 Mr. Halla withdrew a requested land use change
November 26, 2018 City Council review final revisions to 2040 Comprehensive Plan
December 10, 2018 City Council approves 2040 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to Metropolitan Council
December 18, 2018 Staff submitted 2040 Comprehensive Plan to Metropolitan Council
December 28, 2018 Staff submitted supplemental information to Metropolitan Council
January 22, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined additional information was required
March 11, 2019 Staff submitted response to Metropolitan Council
April 12, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined additional information was required
May 3, 2019 Staff met with Metropolitan Council representatives to clarify nature of additional information required
October 29, 2019 Staff submitted additional information to the Metropolitan Council
November 19, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined 2040 Comprehensive Plan was complete for review
January 6, 2020 Metropolitan Council Community Development Committee recommend 2040 Comprehensive Plan for approval
January 14, 2020 Metropolitan Council Environment Committee recommended 2040 Comprehensive Plan for approval
January 22, 2020 Metropolitan Council approved 2040 Comprehensive Plan
February 10, 2020 Chanhassen City Council will review and adopt 2040 Comprehensive Plan
DISCUSSION
SUMMARY OF REVISIONS AND UPDATES
Chapter 1: Introduction
No Revisions
Chapter 2: Land Use
Staff revised the Net Developable Residential Acreage table to list minimum rather than average density and include acreage expected to develop
as residential within the downtown and regional/lifestyle center.
Staff added narrative text clarifying, updated and reconciled several land use tables that the increase in the city’s total acreage was the result of
more accurate mapping technology between the 2030 plan and 2040 plan.
Staff add a 16 unit per acre minimum and 33 unit per acre historic maximum density range for residential developments within the Central
Business District (CBD). These numbers were derived from past development patterns within the CBD. Previously no maximum or minimum
density was listed.
Footnotes were added to land use tables stating the expected percentage of downtown that would redevelop as residential high density during
each decade, and noting the acreage that had developed as residential high density between 2015 and 2020.
Footnotes were added to land use tables explaining what percentage of land guided for commercial and office would develop as residential
within the Avienda development during each decade.
Staff added narrative text clarifying that 30 percent of the land guided for regional/lifestyle center commercial will develop with net densities
between 10 and 16 units and acre.
Staff removed the business fringe (BF) district from the list of commercial land use subcategories to avoid confusion (the BF district is a zoning
district and not a land use subcategory).
Staff revised narrative text throughout the land use chapter to maintain and clarify the distinction between zoning districts, land use, and
commercial land use subcategories.
Staff added a map showing the location of the commercial land use subcategories within the city.
Staff provided a list of zoning districts and intent of each district at the request of the Metropolitan Council.
Staff revised the narrative description of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to emphasize that the city and Metropolitan Council
collaborate to identify the location of the MUSA.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Adoption of 2040 Comprehensive PlanSectionOLD BUSINESS Item No: F.1.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No: PROPOSED MOTIONThe City Council approves the resolution adopting the City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan.Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.SUMMARYMinnesota law requires communities within the sevencounty metropolitan area to create and adopt a comprehensive plan and grants the MetropolitanCouncil the authority to review and approve municipal comprehensive plans. Comprehensive plans span a twentyyear period and cities are required toupdate them every ten years. Staff started the process of creating the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in 2017.In many ways, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is a continuation of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan with no substantive changes proposed to the city’sland use plan and minor updates to the city’s goals and policies. Most of the changes between these comprehensive plans are the result of new orrevised requirements from the Metropolitan Council. A draft comprehensive plan was presented to City Council on December 10, 2018 and CityCouncil authorized staff to submit the draft to the Metropolitan Council for review.During their review of the city’s draft comprehensive plan, the Metropolitan Council required that the city make several revisions, include supplementalinformation, and clarify several sections. A timeline of the comprehensive planning process and a discussion of the differences between the draftcomprehensive plan and the current version is provided below.On January 22, 2020, the Metropolitan Council found that the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements;conforms to the regional system plans including transportation, aviation, water resources management, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040;and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions.In addition to the Advisory Comments and Review Record, the Council adopted the following recommendations:1. Authorize the City of Chanhassen to put its 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect.2. Revise the city's forecasts upward as shown in Table 1 of the attached Review Record. (Note that the Metropolitan Council is revising theirforecasts to be consistent with the city’s forecast.)3. Revise the city's sewerserviced forecasts upward as shown in Table 2 of the attached Review Record. (Note that the Metropolitan Council isrevising its forecasts to be consistent with the city’s forecast.)4. Advise the city to implement the advisory comments noted in the Review Record for Surface Water Management.5. Approve the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Sewer Plan.6. Implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Wastewater.The city may now adopt the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and put it into effect.BACKGROUNDTimeline:January 2017 Staff began drafting 2040 Comprehensive Plan ElementsFebruary 23, 2017 Water Management Plan Open HouseMarch 7, 2017 Water Management Plan Open HouseApril 4, 2017 Planning Commission Work SessionApril 10, 2017 City Council Works SessionApril 18, 2017 Planning Commission (Sewer, Transportation, and Water)July 2017 Comprehensive Plan Articles in the “The Connection”July 3, 2017 4thof July Comprehensive Plan OutreachJuly 18, 2017 Planning Commission (Housing, Land Use, Sewer, Water, and Parks)August 1, 2017 National Night Out Comprehensive Plan OutreachAugust 1, 2017 Planning Commission (Natural Resources)August 15, 2017 Planning Commission (Water Resources)September 13, 2017 Comprehensive Plan Open HouseSeptember 14, 2017 Comprehensive Plan Open HouseOctober 3, 2017 Planning Commission (Surface Water, Goal & Policies, Implementation, and CIP)October 17, 2017 Planning Commission Public Hearing on Draft PlanOctober 23, 2017 City Council Authorization of Jurisdictional Review/Metropolitan Council submittal for preliminary reviewFebruary 2, 2018 Interim status Metropolitan Council preliminary review comments receivedFebruary 3, 2018 Feb Fest Comprehensive Plan OutreachFebruary 20, 2018 Metropolitan Council preliminary review comments addressedMarch 2018 Revise 2040 Comprehensive Plan to address jurisdictional commentsApril 3, 2018 Planning Commission reviews jurisdictional comments and Plan revisionsJuly 3, 2018 Watersheds review and approve Local Water Management PlanJuly 17, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing on Revisions and Adoption RecommendationJuly 23, 2018 City Council Work Session on jurisdiction comments and revisionsAugust 13, 2018 City Council review of Comprehensive PlanSeptember 24, 2018 City Council review of revisions based on City Council commentsNovember 1, 2018 Mr. Halla withdrew a requested land use changeNovember 26, 2018 City Council review final revisions to 2040 Comprehensive PlanDecember 10, 2018 City Council approves 2040 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to Metropolitan CouncilDecember 18, 2018 Staff submitted 2040 Comprehensive Plan to Metropolitan CouncilDecember 28, 2018 Staff submitted supplemental information to Metropolitan CouncilJanuary 22, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined additional information was requiredMarch 11, 2019 Staff submitted response to Metropolitan CouncilApril 12, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined additional information was requiredMay 3, 2019 Staff met with Metropolitan Council representatives to clarify nature of additional information requiredOctober 29, 2019 Staff submitted additional information to the Metropolitan CouncilNovember 19, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined 2040 Comprehensive Plan was complete for reviewJanuary 6, 2020 Metropolitan Council Community Development Committee recommend 2040 Comprehensive Plan for approvalJanuary 14, 2020 Metropolitan Council Environment Committee recommended 2040 Comprehensive Plan for approvalJanuary 22, 2020 Metropolitan Council approved 2040 Comprehensive PlanFebruary 10, 2020 Chanhassen City Council will review and adopt 2040 Comprehensive PlanDISCUSSIONSUMMARY OF REVISIONS AND UPDATESChapter 1: IntroductionNo RevisionsChapter 2: Land UseStaff revised the Net Developable Residential Acreage table to list minimum rather than average density and include acreage expected to developas residential within the downtown and regional/lifestyle center.Staff added narrative text clarifying, updated and reconciled several land use tables that the increase in the city’s total acreage was the result ofmore accurate mapping technology between the 2030 plan and 2040 plan.Staff add a 16 unit per acre minimum and 33 unit per acre historic maximum density range for residential developments within the CentralBusiness District (CBD). These numbers were derived from past development patterns within the CBD. Previously no maximum or minimumdensity was listed.Footnotes were added to land use tables stating the expected percentage of downtown that would redevelop as residential high density duringeach decade, and noting the acreage that had developed as residential high density between 2015 and 2020.Footnotes were added to land use tables explaining what percentage of land guided for commercial and office would develop as residentialwithin the Avienda development during each decade.Staff added narrative text clarifying that 30 percent of the land guided for regional/lifestyle center commercial will develop with net densitiesbetween 10 and 16 units and acre.Staff removed the business fringe (BF) district from the list of commercial land use subcategories to avoid confusion (the BF district is a zoningdistrict and not a land use subcategory).Staff revised narrative text throughout the land use chapter to maintain and clarify the distinction between zoning districts, land use, andcommercial land use subcategories. Staff added a map showing the location of the commercial land use subcategories within the city.
Staff provided a list of zoning districts and intent of each district at the request of the Metropolitan Council.
Staff revised the narrative description of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to emphasize that the city and Metropolitan Council
collaborate to identify the location of the MUSA.
Added text below Figure 29 stating (page 28): This map depicts the land uses listed in Figure 27 ‘2015 Land Use Table’.
Chapter 3: Housing
Staff revised the Capacity to Meet Affordable Housing Need Allocation table to include residential acreage within the regional/lifestyle center
commercial/office and downtown areas and to list the relevant minimum densities for these areas.
Staff revised the Capacity to Meet Affordable Housing Need Allocation table to only include acreage expected to develop between 2021 and
2030. Narrative text was added clarifying how the table’s numbers were determined.
A note was added clarifying the function of an asterisk in the Land Use Table in 5Year Stages, Existing, and Planned Land Use in Actions Table.
At the direction of the Metropolitan Council, staff added a discussion of additional affordable housing resources and programs (Carver County
CDA Land Trust, MN Housing, preservation of expiring lowincome housing tax credits, Consolidated RFPs, etc.) to its implementation plan.
Staff removed increasing the supply of rental housing from the list of existing housing needs, and removed related items from the current needs
implementation plan.
Staff removed information relating to the Livable Communities Act’s 2015 Housing Action Plan from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Staff replaced existing Livable Communities Act (LCA) narrative text with text acknowledging that the city was committed to following State and
Federal fair housing standards, is aware that participants in the LCA will be required to adopt local fair housing policies, and that the city will
investigate adopting a local fair housing policy.
Staff updated tables containing information on housing costburdened households, the existing housing assessment, ownership housing, HUD
affordability levels, affordable apartment rents, and publically subsidized units to reflect data that was updated subsequent to the plan being
drafted.
Chapter 4: Natural Resources
No Revisions
Chapter 5: Parks and Trails
Maps revised to include labeling for Regional Park and Trail facilities.
The Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN). A new RBTN section was added to the Parks chapter. A description of the RBTN has
been added to the Parks and Trail chapter (chapter 5, page 86).
A new figure was created to depict the RBTN and areas designated for commercial, employment, and office were included in the RBTN map in
chapter 5, page 90.
The maps were changed to state Existing/State Trails and the trails were labeled to correctly identify, map, and label Regional Park and Trail
facilities, to all Regional Parks System facilities depicted in Figure 52, Figure 53, Figure 56, and Figure 57.
Maps have been revised differentiating the appearance of the "Existing Regional Trails" from the Minnesota Valley State Trail on the south side of
the Minnesota River in Figure 52, Figure 53, Figure 56, and Figure 57.
Chapter 6: Transportation
The city was requested to provide written summaries of the transit service (Southwest Transit) for the city. Staff has modified the map on page
131 to incorporate both the park and ride locations and the bus routes (http://www.swtransit.org/schedules/). Figure number and legend where
also added to the map.Please note that there are no local circulator bus routes in Chanhassen.
The city is located within Metropolitan Council transit market areas III and IV. The city was directed to modify the discussion on page 131 to
describe Market Area IV and service appropriate for that market.
The reference to “B” arterials has been changed to “Other” arterials (Lyman Boulevard) (pages 125 and 127). We advised the Metropolitan
Council that the city had addressed the Highway 101 realignment as part of Figure 6.6 (page 118). There are no other significant rightofway
corridors in Chanhassen for preservation.
The discussion of the Green Line Extension (page 134) has been revised to include revisions to the proposed light rail plans by the Metropolitan
Council.
Discussion expanded to emphasize city policies, connections and interlocal cooperation regarding the pedestrian system.
Chapter 7: Sewer
The city submitted maps via a followup email showing:Existing connection points to the metropolitan disposal system; Future connection points
for new growth; Local sewer service districts by connection point; and, Intercommunity connections.
The narrative was updated to indicate that no intercommunity service agreements have been entered into since 2008 (page 150).
Narrative revised on pages 154–155 describing the management program for subsurface sewage treatment systems. The correct citation is
Chapter 19, Article IV of the Chanhassen City Code. We have summarized that this chapter provides regulation for the design and maintenance
of SSTS.
The plan discussion on I/I strategies on pages 161–163 was updated and revised. Infiltration is clear water that enters the sanitary sewer system
through defects in the sewer pipes, joints, manholes, and service laterals. Water that enters the sewer system from cross connections with storm
sewer, sump pumps, roof drains, or manhole covers is considered inflow.
The table and clarifying narrative was added to Section 7.5 Future Sanitary Sewer System, Wastewater Flow Projections (page 166, Figure
7.17).
The city added the map and table in Section 7.5, Future Sanitary Sewer System (p. 168).
The city submitted the Eden Prairie Cooperative Agreement for Metropolitan Council files. This area covers the Settlers West Development in
Chanhassen south of Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) in the Eden Prairie boundary. We have added language about cities’ reimbursement for
wastewater charges as well as a map of the interconnection areas (p. 179).
Figure added on page 183 added new direct connections to the regional interceptor.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 10, 2020SubjectResolution 2020XX: Adoption of 2040 Comprehensive PlanSectionOLD BUSINESS Item No: F.1.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No: PROPOSED MOTIONThe City Council approves the resolution adopting the City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan.Approval requires a 4/5 Vote.SUMMARYMinnesota law requires communities within the sevencounty metropolitan area to create and adopt a comprehensive plan and grants the MetropolitanCouncil the authority to review and approve municipal comprehensive plans. Comprehensive plans span a twentyyear period and cities are required toupdate them every ten years. Staff started the process of creating the 2040 Comprehensive Plan in 2017.In many ways, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is a continuation of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan with no substantive changes proposed to the city’sland use plan and minor updates to the city’s goals and policies. Most of the changes between these comprehensive plans are the result of new orrevised requirements from the Metropolitan Council. A draft comprehensive plan was presented to City Council on December 10, 2018 and CityCouncil authorized staff to submit the draft to the Metropolitan Council for review.During their review of the city’s draft comprehensive plan, the Metropolitan Council required that the city make several revisions, include supplementalinformation, and clarify several sections. A timeline of the comprehensive planning process and a discussion of the differences between the draftcomprehensive plan and the current version is provided below.On January 22, 2020, the Metropolitan Council found that the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements;conforms to the regional system plans including transportation, aviation, water resources management, and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040;and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions.In addition to the Advisory Comments and Review Record, the Council adopted the following recommendations:1. Authorize the City of Chanhassen to put its 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect.2. Revise the city's forecasts upward as shown in Table 1 of the attached Review Record. (Note that the Metropolitan Council is revising theirforecasts to be consistent with the city’s forecast.)3. Revise the city's sewerserviced forecasts upward as shown in Table 2 of the attached Review Record. (Note that the Metropolitan Council isrevising its forecasts to be consistent with the city’s forecast.)4. Advise the city to implement the advisory comments noted in the Review Record for Surface Water Management.5. Approve the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Sewer Plan.6. Implement the advisory comments in the Review Record for Wastewater.The city may now adopt the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and put it into effect.BACKGROUNDTimeline:January 2017 Staff began drafting 2040 Comprehensive Plan ElementsFebruary 23, 2017 Water Management Plan Open HouseMarch 7, 2017 Water Management Plan Open HouseApril 4, 2017 Planning Commission Work SessionApril 10, 2017 City Council Works SessionApril 18, 2017 Planning Commission (Sewer, Transportation, and Water)July 2017 Comprehensive Plan Articles in the “The Connection”July 3, 2017 4thof July Comprehensive Plan OutreachJuly 18, 2017 Planning Commission (Housing, Land Use, Sewer, Water, and Parks)August 1, 2017 National Night Out Comprehensive Plan OutreachAugust 1, 2017 Planning Commission (Natural Resources)August 15, 2017 Planning Commission (Water Resources)September 13, 2017 Comprehensive Plan Open HouseSeptember 14, 2017 Comprehensive Plan Open HouseOctober 3, 2017 Planning Commission (Surface Water, Goal & Policies, Implementation, and CIP)October 17, 2017 Planning Commission Public Hearing on Draft PlanOctober 23, 2017 City Council Authorization of Jurisdictional Review/Metropolitan Council submittal for preliminary reviewFebruary 2, 2018 Interim status Metropolitan Council preliminary review comments receivedFebruary 3, 2018 Feb Fest Comprehensive Plan OutreachFebruary 20, 2018 Metropolitan Council preliminary review comments addressedMarch 2018 Revise 2040 Comprehensive Plan to address jurisdictional commentsApril 3, 2018 Planning Commission reviews jurisdictional comments and Plan revisionsJuly 3, 2018 Watersheds review and approve Local Water Management PlanJuly 17, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing on Revisions and Adoption RecommendationJuly 23, 2018 City Council Work Session on jurisdiction comments and revisionsAugust 13, 2018 City Council review of Comprehensive PlanSeptember 24, 2018 City Council review of revisions based on City Council commentsNovember 1, 2018 Mr. Halla withdrew a requested land use changeNovember 26, 2018 City Council review final revisions to 2040 Comprehensive PlanDecember 10, 2018 City Council approves 2040 Comprehensive Plan for submittal to Metropolitan CouncilDecember 18, 2018 Staff submitted 2040 Comprehensive Plan to Metropolitan CouncilDecember 28, 2018 Staff submitted supplemental information to Metropolitan CouncilJanuary 22, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined additional information was requiredMarch 11, 2019 Staff submitted response to Metropolitan CouncilApril 12, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined additional information was requiredMay 3, 2019 Staff met with Metropolitan Council representatives to clarify nature of additional information requiredOctober 29, 2019 Staff submitted additional information to the Metropolitan CouncilNovember 19, 2019 Metropolitan Council determined 2040 Comprehensive Plan was complete for reviewJanuary 6, 2020 Metropolitan Council Community Development Committee recommend 2040 Comprehensive Plan for approvalJanuary 14, 2020 Metropolitan Council Environment Committee recommended 2040 Comprehensive Plan for approvalJanuary 22, 2020 Metropolitan Council approved 2040 Comprehensive PlanFebruary 10, 2020 Chanhassen City Council will review and adopt 2040 Comprehensive PlanDISCUSSIONSUMMARY OF REVISIONS AND UPDATESChapter 1: IntroductionNo RevisionsChapter 2: Land UseStaff revised the Net Developable Residential Acreage table to list minimum rather than average density and include acreage expected to developas residential within the downtown and regional/lifestyle center.Staff added narrative text clarifying, updated and reconciled several land use tables that the increase in the city’s total acreage was the result ofmore accurate mapping technology between the 2030 plan and 2040 plan.Staff add a 16 unit per acre minimum and 33 unit per acre historic maximum density range for residential developments within the CentralBusiness District (CBD). These numbers were derived from past development patterns within the CBD. Previously no maximum or minimumdensity was listed.Footnotes were added to land use tables stating the expected percentage of downtown that would redevelop as residential high density duringeach decade, and noting the acreage that had developed as residential high density between 2015 and 2020.Footnotes were added to land use tables explaining what percentage of land guided for commercial and office would develop as residentialwithin the Avienda development during each decade.Staff added narrative text clarifying that 30 percent of the land guided for regional/lifestyle center commercial will develop with net densitiesbetween 10 and 16 units and acre.Staff removed the business fringe (BF) district from the list of commercial land use subcategories to avoid confusion (the BF district is a zoningdistrict and not a land use subcategory).Staff revised narrative text throughout the land use chapter to maintain and clarify the distinction between zoning districts, land use, andcommercial land use subcategories. Staff added a map showing the location of the commercial land use subcategories within the city.Staff provided a list of zoning districts and intent of each district at the request of the Metropolitan Council.Staff revised the narrative description of Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to emphasize that the city and Metropolitan Councilcollaborate to identify the location of the MUSA.Added text below Figure 29 stating (page 28): This map depicts the land uses listed in Figure 27 ‘2015 Land Use Table’.Chapter 3: HousingStaff revised the Capacity to Meet Affordable Housing Need Allocation table to include residential acreage within the regional/lifestyle centercommercial/office and downtown areas and to list the relevant minimum densities for these areas.Staff revised the Capacity to Meet Affordable Housing Need Allocation table to only include acreage expected to develop between 2021 and2030. Narrative text was added clarifying how the table’s numbers were determined.A note was added clarifying the function of an asterisk in the Land Use Table in 5Year Stages, Existing, and Planned Land Use in Actions Table.At the direction of the Metropolitan Council, staff added a discussion of additional affordable housing resources and programs (Carver CountyCDA Land Trust, MN Housing, preservation of expiring lowincome housing tax credits, Consolidated RFPs, etc.) to its implementation plan.Staff removed increasing the supply of rental housing from the list of existing housing needs, and removed related items from the current needsimplementation plan.Staff removed information relating to the Livable Communities Act’s 2015 Housing Action Plan from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.Staff replaced existing Livable Communities Act (LCA) narrative text with text acknowledging that the city was committed to following State andFederal fair housing standards, is aware that participants in the LCA will be required to adopt local fair housing policies, and that the city willinvestigate adopting a local fair housing policy.Staff updated tables containing information on housing costburdened households, the existing housing assessment, ownership housing, HUDaffordability levels, affordable apartment rents, and publically subsidized units to reflect data that was updated subsequent to the plan beingdrafted.Chapter 4: Natural ResourcesNo RevisionsChapter 5: Parks and TrailsMaps revised to include labeling for Regional Park and Trail facilities.The Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN). A new RBTN section was added to the Parks chapter. A description of the RBTN hasbeen added to the Parks and Trail chapter (chapter 5, page 86).A new figure was created to depict the RBTN and areas designated for commercial, employment, and office were included in the RBTN map inchapter 5, page 90.The maps were changed to state Existing/State Trails and the trails were labeled to correctly identify, map, and label Regional Park and Trailfacilities, to all Regional Parks System facilities depicted in Figure 52, Figure 53, Figure 56, and Figure 57.Maps have been revised differentiating the appearance of the "Existing Regional Trails" from the Minnesota Valley State Trail on the south side ofthe Minnesota River in Figure 52, Figure 53, Figure 56, and Figure 57. Chapter 6: TransportationThe city was requested to provide written summaries of the transit service (Southwest Transit) for the city. Staff has modified the map on page131 to incorporate both the park and ride locations and the bus routes (http://www.swtransit.org/schedules/). Figure number and legend wherealso added to the map.Please note that there are no local circulator bus routes in Chanhassen.The city is located within Metropolitan Council transit market areas III and IV. The city was directed to modify the discussion on page 131 todescribe Market Area IV and service appropriate for that market.The reference to “B” arterials has been changed to “Other” arterials (Lyman Boulevard) (pages 125 and 127). We advised the MetropolitanCouncil that the city had addressed the Highway 101 realignment as part of Figure 6.6 (page 118). There are no other significant rightofwaycorridors in Chanhassen for preservation.The discussion of the Green Line Extension (page 134) has been revised to include revisions to the proposed light rail plans by the MetropolitanCouncil.Discussion expanded to emphasize city policies, connections and interlocal cooperation regarding the pedestrian system.Chapter 7: SewerThe city submitted maps via a followup email showing:Existing connection points to the metropolitan disposal system; Future connection pointsfor new growth; Local sewer service districts by connection point; and, Intercommunity connections.The narrative was updated to indicate that no intercommunity service agreements have been entered into since 2008 (page 150).Narrative revised on pages 154–155 describing the management program for subsurface sewage treatment systems. The correct citation isChapter 19, Article IV of the Chanhassen City Code. We have summarized that this chapter provides regulation for the design and maintenanceof SSTS.The plan discussion on I/I strategies on pages 161–163 was updated and revised. Infiltration is clear water that enters the sanitary sewer systemthrough defects in the sewer pipes, joints, manholes, and service laterals. Water that enters the sewer system from cross connections with stormsewer, sump pumps, roof drains, or manhole covers is considered inflow.The table and clarifying narrative was added to Section 7.5 Future Sanitary Sewer System, Wastewater Flow Projections (page 166, Figure7.17).The city added the map and table in Section 7.5, Future Sanitary Sewer System (p. 168).The city submitted the Eden Prairie Cooperative Agreement for Metropolitan Council files. This area covers the Settlers West Development in
Chanhassen south of Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) in the Eden Prairie boundary. We have added language about cities’ reimbursement for
wastewater charges as well as a map of the interconnection areas (p. 179).
Figure added on page 183 added new direct connections to the regional interceptor.
Chapter 8: Water
No revisions. The city will provide the completed final local water supply plan in an appendix, which was submitted in 2016 and approved by the
Department of Natural Resources on June 11, 2019.
Chapter 9: Local Surface Water Management Plan
No Revisions.
Chapter 10: Comprehensive Plan Implementation & Capital Improvements Plan
The city provided a link to the City Code: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/citycode. Zoning is in Chapter 20. Also included the local zoning map and zoning
category descriptions and intent statements for each district. The Plan identifies corresponding zoning categories for each land use.
ACTION
Following is the proposed action requested by the Metropolitan Council:
Submit a copy of the adoption resolution to the Metropolitan Council for their records.
Submit one hard copy of the adopted City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council and an electronic copy of the
Plan.
Submit any updated ordinances or controls intended to implement the Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the resolution adopting the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
2040 Comprehensive Plan Adoption Resolution
Metropolitan Council City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan Notice of Council Action January 23, 2020
Metropolitan Council’s January 22, 2019 Incomplete Letter Responses
Metropolitan Council’s April 12, 2019 Incomplete Letter Responses
CITY OF CHANHASSEN
CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA
DATE: February 10, 2020 RESOLUTION NO:
MOTION BY: SECONDED BY:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING
THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen submitted the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan to adjacent
communities on October 24, 2017, for their review. The six month agency review period ended on
April 25, 2018; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan and all
public comments on the following dates:
April 4, 2017 Overview of Comprehensive Plan
April 18, 12017 Sewer, Transportation, and Water
July 18, 2017 Housing, Land Use, Sewer, Water, and Parks & Open Space
August 1, 2017 Natural Resources
August 15, 2017 Water Resources
October 3, 2017 Surface Water, Goals & Policies, Implementation and CIP
October 17, 2017 Public Hearing to Review the 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted on July 17, 2018 to recommend that the City
Council adopt the 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council approved the submittal of the
2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for their review pursuant to Minnesota Statues
473.175 and 473.851 to 473.866; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council completed its review of the City of Chanhassen
Comprehensive Plan update, found that the Plan meets Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements;
conforms to the regional system plans including transportation, aviation, water resources management,
and parks; is consistent with Thrive MSP 2040; and is compatible with the plans of adjacent
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council voted on January 22, 2020 to authorize the City of
Chanhassen to put its 2040 Comprehensive Plan into effect without any Plan modifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council approves and
adopts the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 10th day of February 2010.
ATTEST:
Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor
YES NO ABSENT
\\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\plan\2040 comp plan\adoption resolution.doc
1
Response to Metropolitan Council’s Incomplete Letter
January 22, 2019
Kate Aanenson
Community Development
Director City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan - Incomplete
for Review Metropolitan Council Review File No. 21810-1
Metropolitan Council District 4, Deb Barber
Dear Ms. Aanenson:
Thank you for the submission of the City of Chanhassen's 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan) on
December 18, 2018. The City submitted supplemental information on December 28, 2018.
Metropolitan Council (Council) staff found that there are areas where the Plan is incomplete.
Review of the Plan will be suspended until the additional information is submitted and found
complete for review. The following items were found incomplete:
REQUIRED INFORMATION
Transportation (Russ Owen, 651-602-1724)
Transit
• The routes serving the City need to be identified and shown on a map.
The city has written summaries of the transit service for the city. Staff has modified the map on
page 131 to incorporate both the park and ride locations and the bus routes
(http://www.swtransit.org/schedules/). Please note that there are no local circulator bus routes in
Chanhassen.
• The Plan states that the City is in, Market Area III, but does not mention that much of the
community is in Market Area IV. The Plan needs to describe Market Area IV and service
appropriate for that market. This information can be found in the City's System
Statement.
•
The city has modified this discussion to include Market Area IV on page 131.
Bicycling and Walking
• Describe the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN).
A new RBTN section was added to the Parks Chapter. .A description of the RBTN has been added to
the Parks and Trail chapter (Chapter 5, page 86).
• Include regional employment clusters, activity center nodes, and local activity centers on
Figure 5-3.
2
A new figure was created to depict the RBTN and areas designated for commercial, employment,
and office.were included in the RBTN map in Chapter 5, page 90.
Advisory Comments
• On page 122 and 124, the current terminology for "B" arterials is "other" arterials.
• Council staff suggest Identifying future rights-of-way that need to be preserved.
• Consider describing recommendations from recent corridor studies
regarding roadway improvements, changes in land use, and/or
access.
The reference to “B” arterials has been changed to “Other” arterials (pages 125
and 127). The city addresses Highway 101 realignment as part of figure 6.6
(page 118). There are no other significant right-of-way corridors in
Chanhassen for preservation.
• The map on page 128 could be clarified by adding a figure number, correcting the
legend to reference Park "-Ride", and correcting the location of the planned Park- Ride
to the northwest quadrant of Powers & Highway 5. We also suggest describing the
planned park-ride in the text.
Staff has modified the map on page 131 to incorporate both the park and ride locations and the bus
routes. There is no park and ride lot proposed in the northwest quadrant of Powers and Highway 5.
While Southwest Transit currently owns some land at Audubon Road and West 78th Street, they are
in the process of selling it.
• We offer the following minor corrections for the discussion of Green Line Extension on
page 131:
o There will be 16 new stations, not 15.
o Eden Prairie Town Center Station should not be shown in the legend as a deferred
station - it is now a planned Opening Day station.
o Remove references to CTIB, as this organization no longer exists.
We have revised the discussion of the Green Line Extension (page 134).
• Flying Cloud Airport identifier is FCM, not FMC.
Corrected. (page 138)
• Identify any local roadway issues or problem areas for good movement, such as
weight-restricted bridges, bridges with insufficient height or width clearances, locations
with unprotected road crossings of active rail lines, or intersections with inadequate
turning radii.
Figure 6.5 System Deficiencies map shows roadway deficiencies in the community and is followed
by an extensive discussion of the deficiencies. (pages 115 – 120)
• Describe and map the existing and planned on-road and off-road bicycle facilities in the
City.
See trail map in Park and Trail chapter 5 Figures 5-2 and 5-6. The city does not have nor do we
3
currently plan for any on-road bicycle facilities.
• Discuss pedestrian system needs in a manner that responds to the City's Community
Designation and addresses the needs of the City. Refer to the Emerging Suburban
Edge Thrive Policy Summary on the City's Community Page located under the Council
Policy tab.
Discussion of system expanded to emphasize city policies, connections and inter-local cooperation.
Wastewater (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1119)
• Provide an electronic map or maps (GIS shape files or equivalent) showing information
for the existing sanitary sewer system including existing connections points to the
metropolitan disposal system, future connection poi nts for new growth if needeq, local
sewer service districts by connection point, and intercommunity connections.
The city submitted electronic maps to Steven Hack of the Metropolitan Council in a Dec. 18, 2018
email. The future connection point within the proposed “Galpin Site” are shown below:
• Provide a copy of intercommunity service agreements. If no agreements have been
entered into since 2008, then the Plan should state as such. Include a map of areas
covered by the agreement, if applicable.
The narrative will be updated to indicate that no intercommunity service agreements have been entered
into since 2008. (page 150)
• Include a table or tables that provide local system information including capacity and
design flows for existing trunk sewers, and assignment of 2040 growth forecasts by
Metropolitan interceptor facility.
The following table will be added to Section 7.5 Future Sanitary Sewer System, Wastewater Flow
Projections. (page 166 Figure 7.17)
4
2020 2030 2040
Interceptor House Pop Employ House Pop Employ House Pop Employ
Lake Ann 8,215 21,205 14,957 10,066 26,172 16,351 12,091 31,330 17,708
Shorewood 1,405 4,025 443 1,454 4,104 449 1,529 4,345 492
• The Plan included a table "Surrounding Jurisdiction's Comments" on page 3 of 3 that
indicates it revised the Plan to address the Council's comment regarding the
breakdown of the 2020, 2030, and 2040 growth forecasts by interceptor. However, that
information could not be found in the revised Plan. This is required.
The narrative will be updated accordingly. (page 166, Figure 7.17))
• Describe the requirements and standards in your community for minimizing inflow and
infiltration. Include a copy of the local ordinance or resolution that prohibits discharge
from sump pumps, foundation drains, and/or rain leaders to the sanitary sewer system.
Include a copy of the local ordinance or resolution requiring the disconnection of
existing foundation drains, sump pumps, and roof leaders from the sanitary sewer
system.
An entire section on inflow and infiltration is incorporated in the plan (page 160) as well as the code
requirement in Appendix C (page 190). See Chapter 19 Article IV of the Chanhassen City Code:
www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/city code
• Describe the sources, extent, and significance of existing inflow and infiltration in both
the municipal and private sewer systems.
See Page 160 - 161 of the Plan.
o Include a summary of the extent of the systems that contributes to I/I such as
locations, quantities of piping or manholes, quantity of service laterals, or other
measures. If an analysis has not been completed, include a schedule and scope of
future system analysis.
On Page 160, the following has been added as the last paragraph under the “Infiltration and Inflow” section:
The City of Chanhassen has completed inspections, repairs and upgrades to the public sanitary system. In
2019, the City’s I&I Study will be updated in an effort to quantify and locate remaining sources of I&I.
o Include the measured or estimated amount of clear water flow generated from the
public municipal and private sewer systems.
See page 160 of plan.
o The method described in the Plan for quantifying clear water varies depending on
water usage rates and may not provide an accurate or reasonable measurement
of inflow or infiltration.
Noted. Please provide a preferred method for measurement, if available.
5
Include a cost summary for remediating the 1/1 sources identified in the community.
If previous 1/1 mitigation work has occurred in the community, incl ude a summary of
flow reductions and investments completed. If costs for mitigating I/l have not been
analyzed, include the anticipated wastewater service rates or other costs attributed to
inflow and infiltration.
On Page 160 of the plan, the paragraph will be added as noted under “Infiltration and Inflow”:
Between 2009 and 2018 the City of Chanhassen spent over $994,000 on I&I reduction on efforts
such as sanitary sewer lining, installation of I&I barriers, replacement of sanitary sewer and sanitary
sewer televising.
• Describe the implementation plan for preventing and eliminating excessive inflow and
infiltration from entering both the municipal and private sewer systems. Include the
strategy for implementing projects, activities, or programs planned to mitigate
excessive 1/1 from entering the municipal and private sewer systems.
For new trunk sewer systems that require connection to the Metropolitan Disposal
System, include a table that details the proposed time schedule for the construction of
the new trunk sewer system.
See page 160 of the plan.
• Figure 3.4 on page 179 in the Plan depicts "Future Sanitary Sewer" extensions where
a few represent new direct connections to the. regional ·interceptor. Dates for these
anticipated connections need to be presented in the Plan.
Figure will be added on page 183.
Type of Connection Date of Connection
Galpin Site between
Galpin Blvd. and Lake
Ann
8” lateral connection to
the interceptor
2019
Gorra Site between
Lake Ann and Trunk
Highway 5
8” lateral connection to
the interceptor
No development plans
have been submitted.
Anticipate development
by 2025..
• Describe your management program for sub-surface sewage treatment systems
(SSTS) to comply with MPCA 7080 regulations.
The following was added on page 154: SSTS required to be pumped every three years. A compliance
report must be completed upon sale of a home that is served by an SSTS, unless one has been
completed within the last three years.
• The Plan references Chapter 19 of City Ordinance that addresses SSTS' within the
6
City. A copy of the referenced ordinance needs to either be included in the Plan, or a
reference included in the Plan as to where it can be found on the City's website.
A copy of the ordinance is in appendix C page 190.
• Provide a map or maps (GIS shape files or equivalent) showing the location of sub-
surface sewage treatment systems and the location of nonconforming systems or
systems with problems.
A map was in the plan on page 184 (Figure.3.6)
Advisory Comments
• In its response letter to the Council, the City cited that the TAZ data apportions growth
by area, but that the TAZ areas do not correspond to interceptor service areas. It is
very typical that TAZ and interceptor service area do not correlate with one another.
However, it is common for most communities using land use mapping, local
wastewater districts, and TAZs, to develop an estimate of forecast assignments using
proportioning via GIS. Council staff advise that without this information the Council will
use its own assumptions and assignments for future regional capacity allocations for
the City.
We have prepared a proportionate allocation of growth. (page 166)
• For quantifying l/I, some communities have used the EPA guidance to determine the
annual 1/1 and peak month l/1
https://www3.epa.gov/region1/sso/pdfs/Guide4Estimatinglnfiltrationlnflow.pdf
Noted.
• Please refer to the www.metrocouncil.org/iandi website and the Thrive 2040 plan for
current inflow and infiltration policies.
Noted.
Regional Parks and Trails (Colin Kelly, 651-602-1361)
To correctly identify, map, and label Regional Park and Trail facilities, add labels to all
Regional Parks System facilities depicted in Figure 5-2, Figure 5-3, Figure 5-6, and Figure
5-7.
Maps have been revised. For all figures referenced, the map was changed to state Existing/State
Trails and the trails were labeled.
Advisory Comments
• Council staff recommend differentiating the appearance of the "Existing Regional
Trails" from the Minnesota Valley State Trail on the south side of the Minnesota River in
Figure 5-2, Figure 5-3, Figure 5-6, and Figure 5-7. Both are depicted using gray lines.
•
Maps have been revised. Labels were added for all Regional Park System Facilities.
• Council staff recommend differentiating the appearance of the "Existing Regional
7
Trails" from the Minnesota Valley State Trail on the south side of the Minnesota River
Figure 5-3. Both are depicted using a dashed black line.
Map has been revised. For all figures referenced, the legend was changed to state Existing/State Trails
and the trails were labeled.
Land Use (Angela R. Torres, 651-602-1566)
Existing Land Use
• The Existing Land Use Map and the existing land use table are from two different time
periods and need to reflect the same information in both the table and the map. The text
could clarify if the information is the same.
Add text below figure 2-9 stating (page 28):
This map depicts the land uses listed in Figure 2-7 ‘2015 Land Use Table’
• The acres total for 2015 in Figures 2-6 and 2-7 need to match. Office, Industrial, and
Agricultural calculations are slightly off as a starting point. Correction is needed.
Figure 2-7 will be updated. (page 27)
Future Land Use
• Tables need to represent the same total area for the City. Total acres for the City
should be the same in 2015, 2020, 2030, and 2040 unless the City's boundaries
changed, or additional land became available in another manner.
Text will be added under Figure 2-8 Stating: “The 35 acre increase in the City’s total land area is the
result of improvements in GIS technology and mapping which have led to a more accurate calculation of
the City’s total acreage. (Page 27) The previous numbers were carried forward from the 2030
Comprehensive Plan.” Text will be added under Figure 2-9 stating: “This map depicts the land uses
listed in Figure 2-7 ‘2015 Land Use Table’.” (page 28)
• It is unclear how the numbers in Figure 2-4 were calculated. Clarification is needed.
The net developable residential acreage for the 2020-2040 period should be able to be
derived from information provided in the other tables for confirmation and that is not
possible with the information currently included in the Plan. Provide additional
clarification, discussion of methodology; or a clearer connection of figures in the
respective tables.
The numbers in Figure 2-4 correspond to the vacant acreage listed in Figure 2-6, except for Low Density
Residential, which lists the wrong total. Figure 2-4 has been updated to reflect the correct value as
shown below. (page 24)
Class Acres
Avg.
Density Units
Low Density Residential 788 2 1,576
Medium Density Residential 186 6 1,116
High Density Residential 118 10 1,180
8
Mixed Use (Residential) 19 14 266
Regional/Lifestyle Center
(Residential) 48 10 480
Totals 1,159 3.98 4,618
• Figure 2-6 needs to use the land use categories defined by the City in the Land Use
Chapter. Central Business District (CBD) is defined, but not identified in the table. It
appears that the Plan incorporates a template provided in the 2030 planning cycle.
Council staff suggest that the Plan only include the land uses defined by the City in the
Plan, as the template land uses were only provided for illustrative purposes.
Central Business District does not appear on the land use table because it is a zoning district within the
Commercial land use category. Staff will add a map of Chanhassen Commercial Land Use Categories
and Mixed Use Land Use to clarify the location of the various zoning districts within the commercial land
use category. (Figure 2-11, page 30)
• The Residential/Lifestyle Center land use is a subcategory of the Central Business
District which indicates that residential uses will be High Density Residential (HDR).
HDR has a minimum net residential density of 8 units per acre. The text describes this
land use as proposing to guide 160 acres to accommodate 800 dwelling units, which
equates to 5 units per acre. As a subcategory, the Residential Lifestyle Center land use
densities must be consistent with the CBD, and the information provided currently
does not match. This needs to be corrected or should be clarified why a lower
density would be allowed in a portion of the CBD.
The Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial is a subcategory of the Commercial Land Use category. The
PUD was approved with up to 30% as high density residential not to exceed 16 units an acre.
160*.3=48, 48*16=768, which corresponds to the “approximately 800 dwelling units” mentioned in the
text.
• The Plan needs to clearly identify the expected share of uses (% residential) for the
Residential/Lifestyle Center subcategory, and needs to provide a minimum and
maximum allowable density range that is consistent with the information in the CBD
land use category description.
The Regional/Lifestyle Center is coequal with the CBD as both fall under the Commercial Land Use
category. The text of Section 2.7.4 will be amended to read: “SThe city projects that 30 percent of land
guided for Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial will develop for residential uses with net densities
between 8 and 16 units.(page 33)
• The Future Land Use Map, Future Land Use Tables, and land use category
descriptions must all reflect the same land use categories. The Central Business
District and the Mixed Use categories are not uniformly represented throughout the
Plan. It is unclear where the CBD is located on the map and it is unclear how the
CBD is incorporated into the respective tables because terminology is not used
consistently throughout the Plan.
The CBD district permits residential (high density) but does not have stipulated density range in
order to allow maximum flexibility for potential redevelopment within the City’s fully built out
commercial core. The sentence reading “Staff anticipates that redevelopment in this district will
create approximately 200 new-dwelling units” will be removed to avoid confusion. Text will be of
9
section 2.7.4 will be amended to read “The city has guided 160 acres at the southeast corner of
Powers and Lyman Boulevards as a potential regional/ lifestyle center. The city projects that 30
percent of land guided for Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial will develop for residential uses
with net densities between 8 and 16 units. For proj ecting land demand, an average density of 10
units per acre was used. The City anticipates that 48 acres of new residential development within
the Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial District will occur between 2020 and 2040. The zoning
for this area is PUD-Regional Commercial.” (page 33)
• Land use categories Mixed Use, Central business District, and Residential/Lifestyle
Center need to individually provide a minimum and maximum allowable density range,
net residential acres, percentage of residential use expected within the land use
category, and be identified on the map. Or clarification is needed regarding the intent
of the three land uses. If Mixed Use represents both CBD and Residential Lifestyle
Center, the Plan is not clear. Identifying the number of housing units is insufficient to
complete the land use analysis.
The map included above titled “Chanhassen Commercial Land Use Categories and Mixed Use
Land Use” (page 33) will be included in the comprehensive plan to help allay the confusion caused
by the fact that CBD is not a land use category, but rather a subcategory of the commercial zoning
within the land use category. Mixed use is its own land use category as shown in the land use map
and map provided above. Both the mixed use and commercial land use categories are consistently
depicted in tables and maps. Text will be added to section 2.7 stating: “Within the area guided for
Commercial Land Use there a several distinct regions shown in Figure 2-11. The intent,
characteristics, and potential zoning of these areas is described in Sections 2.7.1 to 2.7.5” (page
31)
Density Calculations
Calculations of average net residential density must use the lowest allowable density from
planned land use ranges. As an Emerging Suburban Edge community, the City is required
to develop at an average net residential density of 3-5 units per acre. The Plan does not
include sufficient information to confirm that the City is planning for densities consistent
with Council land use policy.
Advisory comments staff received from the Metropolitan Council stated “To be consistent with the
Council’s forecasting method of projecting land demand, staff recommend using the midpoint of the
density range.” (pg. 4, City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update-Preliminary Review,
November 22, 2017). In response to this comment, City Staff sent the following response:
“The projected density within the various land use categories reflect the City’s historical trends. Looking
at single-family subdivisions guided for low-density residential use between 1993 and 2017 the average
net density has been 1.99 units per acre. The City has seen a modest increase in average density in
more recent developments with single-family subdivisions guided for low-density residential use between
2013 and 2017 having an average net density of 2.26 units per acre; however, this is still below the 2.6
unit per acre mid-point. Similarly, areas zoned for high density residential developed between 1994 and
2016 have developed with an average density of 10.51 units per acre, comparted to a 12 unit per acre
midpoint. Staff has elected to use the more conservative historical averages for its growth projections,
rather than assume that average density will increase. Please see the Residential Development
Statistics included in the comprehensive plan for a by development breakdown of the City’s average
density.” At no point was concern expressed that staff was not using the lowest allowable density from
planned land use ranges, and this requirement contradicts previous direction staff received from the
Metropolitan Council.
Advisory Comments
The MUSA Staging discussion in Section 2.13.5 should be clarified to state that the
10
Metropolitan
Council identifies the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA} in partnership with
communities in the region as urban services are needed and as part of the comprehensive
planning process.
The sentence reading “The boundary line is defined and maintained by the Metropolitan Council to
assist in the orderly development of the metropolitan area” will be replaced with a sentence stating “The
Metropolitan Council identifies the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) in partnership with
communities in the region as urban services are needed and as part of the comprehensive planning
process to assist in the orderly development of the metropolitan area”. (page 35)
Housing (Tara Beard, 651-602-
1051} Projected Housing Need
Land guided to address the City's allocation of affordable housing need for 2021-2030 is
not sufficiently described for review, the following must be corrected:
• Information in tables describing future land use is not used consistently throughout the
Plan. Figure 2-6 appears to show 62 (161-99 = 62) acres anticipated to develop as high
density residential between 2020 and 2030. Figure 2-8 appears to show 98 acres of high
density residential developing in that same decade (218-120 = 98). This needs to be
resolved.
The numbers being referenced from Figure 2-6 separate out vacant and developed land throughout five
year periods, Figure 2-8 lists all land (both vacant and developed) that falls under a given land use
category. So in 2020 figure 2-6 shows 217(99+118) total acres of high density residential and that
corresponds to the 2030 figure 2-8 that lists 218 acres of land guided high density residential (the 1 acre
difference is the result of rounding). Similarly in 2030 figure 2-6 lists 250 (161+89) total acres of high
density residential and that corresponds to the 2040 figure in 2-8 that lists 250 acres of land guided for
high density residential. The 10-year lag between existing Fig 2-6 and planned Fig 2-8 is the result of the
fact that Figure 2-8 represents the land use plan created during the 10-year comprehensive plan cycle,
which is 10 years out from the year of the last land use plan.
• In the Housing Chapter, Figure 3-25 notes 137 acres are vacant and available for high
density residential development, but states in the narrative that only 118 will be available
for redevelopment in 2020. Figure 2-6 indicates that 151 (250-99 = 151) acres of high
density residential land will be developed after 2020. Information must be used
consistently throughout the Plan. In addition, only land guided and anticipated to be
developed or redeveloped between 2021 and 2030 counts toward supporting the City's
allocation of affordable housing need (806 units). This needs to be resolved.
The narrative states that 118 acres will be guided for high density residential and 19 acres are guided for
mixed use primarily residential, both with densities in excess of 8 units/acre. Staff arrived at 137 by
combining the two land use categories that met the 8 unit/acre criteria (118+19=137); however, this was
based on the understanding that all land guided could be used to meet requirements. Since only land
expected to develop between 2020 and 2030 is considered, Figure 3-25 (page 57) will be revised and its
expository paragraph will be revised (shown below):
Capacity to Meet Affordable Housing Need Allocation
Land Use Category
Vacant
Acres
Density
(unites/acre)
Total
Units
High Density Residential 62 8 496
Mixed Use Primarily Residential 15 8 120
11
Regional/Lifestyle Center
Commercial 36 8 288
Total 113 8 904
“The city anticipates that 113 acres guided for residential uses with minimum densities of at least 8
units/acre will develop between 2020 and 2030. These 113 acres are divided between 62 acres guided
for high density residential land use which has a density range of 8-16 units/acre, 15 acres guided for
mixed use primarily residential which has a density range of 8-20 units/acre, and 36 acres* guided for
regional/lifestyle center commercial which has a density range of 8-16 units/acre.
*The City has guided 160 acres within the commercial land use category for use as a regional/lifestyle
center. The Planned Unit Development Ordinance that was passed in conjunction with the Avienda
project covers 120 acres of that area and allows 30 percent of those acres to be developed at residential
densities up to 16 units/acre.
• Mixed Use Residential numbers are used inconsistently in the Plan. Also , it is not clear if
the acreages provided in Figures 2-6, 2-8, and 3-25 and the subsequent narrative
consider the 28% residential percentage allocated to the Mixed Use Residential land
use.
The narrative text states “with an additional 19 acres guided for mixed use primarily residential”S this
number corresponds with Figure 2-6’s 19 acres of “Mixed Use Primarily Residential (Vacant) category.
The 28% comes from 19 (number of acres of vacant mixed use expected to be residential) divided by 67
(number of total vacant acres of mixed use) which equals 28.3%.
• Council staff advise that Figure 2-6 has an asterisk after the Mixed Use Primarily
Residential row, but the Plan needs to clarify the significance of the asterisk.
The asterisk was designed to create visual link between the mixed-use primarily residential and mixed
use primarily C/I that are both part of the same land use category. A note will be added stating “*Mixed
Use Primarily Residential and Mixed Use Primarily C/I are both part of the mixed use land use category
in Figure 2-7 and 2-8”. (page26)
Implementation Plan
Some tools the City should consider to address housing needs are not considered. To be
consistent with Council housing policy, the specific tools available must be described and
the level of local support of those tools (some of which require local match dollars, technical
assistance, or formal support) must be noted. Specifically:
• Housing needs to preserve naturally-occurring affordable ownership (Figure 3-13) include
referrals to Carver County CDA resources, but should specifically consider the Carver
County CDA Land Trust and indicate if the City would support and engage in
applications to support the Land Trust to meet this need.
Staff will add sections addressing these items to Figure 3-13.(page 50)
• The preservation of existing naturally occurring affordable rental housing is also a stated
need in Figure 3-13, but there is no mention of the City's willingness to support and engage
in applications to MN Housing, a local 4(d) policy, the issuance of housing bonds or
partnership with organizations such as Greater Minnesota Housing Fund who have NOAH
12
.
resources.
Staff will add sections addressing these items to Figure 3-13. (page 50)
• A local Fair Housing Policy
Staff is revising Sec. 3.4 to discuss a fair housing policy, and the City’s intent to investigate enacting
one. See staff’s response to advisory comments. (page 56)
• Participation in housing-related organizations, partnerships, and initiatives
• Intent to explore the preservation of expiring low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC)
properties with partners such as MN Housing or Carver County CDA.
Staff has added a section addressing this time to figure 3-13. (page 50)
• City support or direct application to specific resources within the Consolidated RFP put
out by Minnesota Housing, include circumstances or types of projects for which the
City would support application, and which AMI bands would be prioritized.
Advisory Comments
• It is unclear why the increasing the supply of rental housing is a priority for existing
housing needs. Staff suggests moving this need to the conversation about future needs.
Staff will rewrite the sentence to read: “The city has identified preserving naturally-occurring affordable
ownership and rental housing, ownership housing for seniors looking to downsize, ownership housing for
first time-homebuyers as the highest priority existing housing needs, and rental housing for individual of
all income levels as the highest priority existing housing needs.” The discussion of TIF financing within
the corresponding section of the implementation plan will be removed. (page 49)
• Council staff recommend eliminating Section 3.4 and section 3.4.1. of the Plan. Livable
Communities Ad (LCA) participation will be renewed for the 2021-2030 decade in the
next 18 months, rendering these numbers obsolete.
Section 3.4 and 3.4.1 will be removed. (page 56)
• Some of the data for the City's existing housing characteristics as provided by the
Council has been updated. Staff recommend for its final draft the City update the data in
Figures 3-28 and 3-29, and in the text of 3.4.4 (Page 58), which cites the 2015 Council
amount for an affordable home purchase though the map in Figure 3-31 reflects the 2016
value of $243,500.
Figure 3-28 will be revised to read:
2016 Housing Cost Burdened Households
30% or less
AMI
31% to 50%
AMI
51% to 80%
AMI
522 363 718
The narrative text will be updated to read: “The Metropolitan Council has found that in 2016 Chanhassen
had 1,403 household who were cost burdened.” (page 59)
13
Figure 3-29 will be revised read:
2016 Existing Housing Assessment
Affordable Level Units % of Units
30% or less AMI 71 0.74%
31% to 50% of AMI 931 9.73%
51% to 80% of AMI 2,012 21.04%
Above 80% AMI 6,551 68.49%
Total 9,565 100.00%
The narrative text will be updated to read: “The Metropolitan Council estimates that Chanhassen has
3,014 dwelling units which are affordable to families making less than 80% of the area’s median income.
(page 60)
Staff was instructed to use the $238,500 figure in the Metropolitan Council’s November 22, 2017
response to its preliminary comprehensive plan; however, the text will be amended to read: “The
Metropolitan Council equates this to a house priced at $243,500.” Additionally, for constancy Figure 3-30
will be revised to read:
2016 Affordable Ownership Housing
30% AMI
50% of
AMI 80% of AMI
$85,500 $153,500 $243,500
(page 60)
Figure 3-27 will also be updated to use 2017 numbers see below:
2017 HUD Twin Cities Affordability Levels
Household Size
Extremely Low Income
(30% of AMI)
Very Low Income
(50% of AMI)
Low Income
(80% of AMI)
One-person $19,000 $31,650 $47,600
Two-person $21,700 $36,200 $54,400
Three-person $24,400 $40,700 $61,200
Four-person $27,100 $45,200 $68,000
Five-person $29,300 $48,850 $73,450
Six-person $32,960 $52,450 $78,900
Seven-person $37,140 $56,050 $84,350
Eight-person $41,320 $59,700 $89,800
(page 59)
Figure 3-32 (page 62) will be updated to use 2017 numbers see below:
2017 Affordable Apartment Rents
Number of
Bedrooms
Affordable rent at 30%
AMI
Affordable rent at 50%
AMI
Affordable rent at 80%
AMI
Studio $474 $791 $1,265
1-BR $508 $848 $1,356
2-BR $610 $1,017 $1,627
3-BR $705 $1,175 $1,880
4-BR $786 $1,311 $2,097
14
Figure 3-33 will be updated to use 2016 numbers as follows
2016 Publically Subsidized Units
All publicly
subsidized units
Publicly subsidized
senior units
Publically subsidized units
for people with disabilities
Publically
subsidized units: All
others
179 0 0 179
(page 62)
• Beginning in 2019, the Council will require local Fair Housing policies to receive
disbursements of Livable Communities Act (LCA) funds. _,§!nee the LCA programs are
noted in the Plan as well as the City's intention to continue participation in the program,
and to ensure that all the housing efforts deployed by the City address Fair Housing
needs, the City should consider adopting a local Fair Housing Policy.
Section 3.4 will be replaced with text stating: “3.4 Livable Communities Act/Fair Housing Policy” “The
City of Chanhassen is committed to meeting all federal and state fair housing standards, and to
protecting its residents from all forms of housing discrimination. Additionally, the Metropolitan Council
plans to require participants in its Livable Community’s Act to adopt local fair housing policies. The City
of Chanhassen, a current participant in the Liable Community’s Act, will investigate adopting a local fair
housing policy to comply with these new requirements and maintain its eligibility in the program. (page
56)
Water Supply (John D. Clark, 651-602-1452)
The City needs to provide the completed final Iocal water supply plan in an appendix to the
2040 Plan and ensure the data and information contained within it is consistent with Chapter
8 of the Plan, including historical and predicted demand.
The city will provide the plan as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan.
Advisory Comment
If available, Council staff request that the City provide to the Council the date the DNR
approved the final local water supply plan and the date that the City adopted the final local
water supply plan.
The City submitted its water management plan to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
in 2016. They have not completed their review.
Implementation (Angela R. Torres, 651-602-1566)
• Describe all relevant official controls in addressing at least zoning, subdivision, water
supply, and private sewer systems. The information in the Implementation Chapter is not
provided in sufficient detail to determine that the Plan meets this requirement.
Chapters 18 Subdivision, 19 Water, Sewers and Sewage Disposal, and 20 Zoning address all the official
controls. Noted in the plan are major revisions to chapters 19 and 20 for surface water. The balance of
city code currently addresses and implements the comprehensive plan.
• Include the local Zoning Map and zoning category descriptions. The Plan identifies
corresponding zoning categories to each land use, it needs to separately include
15
descriptions of these categories. This can be included in the Appendix.
The city will provide a link to the City Code: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/citycode Zoning is in
Chapter 20.
• The Plan must identify what changes are needed to ensure zoning is not in conflict with
the new land use plan and consistent with regional system plans and policies.
See section 2.13.3 regarding land use – zoning inconsistencies. City code requires that all
rezoning, site plans and subdivisions must be consistent with city and regional plans. It is not the
intent of the city to rezone all the land within the city to a zoning consistent with the comprehensive
plan, since much of the community is zoned for rural residential or agricultural uses, but to require
at the time of development or redevelopment of the land that it be consistent with the
comprehensive plan. The city will not create a significant state of nonconforming uses within the
community.
OTHER ADVISORY INFORMATION
Council staff offer the following additional advisory comments for your consideration.
Forecasts (Todd Graham, 651-602-1322)
• Table 2.6 includes building space per employee ratios for commercial, office, and industrial
lands. Council staff advise that industrial and commercial land uses typically have higher
space utilization per employee.
• Chapter 7 presents sewer serviced forecasts (table 7.6). Council staff can agree to modify its
sewer-serviced forecasts to match what the City presents. The revisions are as follows
(underlined):
Noted.
Census
2010
Revised Forecasts
2020 2030
2040
Population 22,952 26,700 31,700 37,100
Metro Sewered 20,576 25,660 30,660 36,060
Households
Metro Sewered
8,352
7,519
10,000
9,620
11,900
11,520
14,000
13,620
Employment 10,905 15,600 17,000 18,400
Metro Sewered 10,662 15,400 16,800 18,200
The forecast revision will be approved by the Council simultaneous with action on the Plan.
Surface Water Management (Jim Larsen, 651-602-1159)
When it is available, we request that the City provide to the Council the date that Riley
Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District approved the Local Water Management Plan
(LWMP), and the date the City adopted the final LWMP. We also request that the City
provide the Council with a copy of the final adopted LWMP that will be included in the final
Plan document that the City adopts, which will need to include the LWMP Appendix A -
Land and Water Resources Inventory.
16
The LWMP was adopted on December 10, 2018. The plan was approved by the watershed district in
the fall of 2018.
A copy of the LWMP and Appendix A will be sent with the updated Comprehensive Plan Documents.
Mapping (Paul Hanson, 651-602-1642)
The City may wish to refine their 2040 Land Use map (page 29) to remove portions of
Highway 212 from non-rights-of-way land use (see image below) as this would more
correctly reflect land uses and could improve the City's measurements of density.
To expedite the Council's review of supplemental materials submitted in response to incomplete items,
please provide a cover memo that outlines where and how the incomplete items are addressed in the
new material. Also, as with the original submittal, please use the online submittal for supplemental
information.
After all of the required elements of the Plan are submitted and found complete, Council staff will
begin the official review process. If you have any questions or need further information regarding
the comments in this letter, please contact me at 651-602-1566 with any questions or for additional
assistance.
Sincerely,
Angela R. Torres, ICP, Manager
Local Planning Assistance
CC: Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District 4
Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator
N:\CommDev\LPA \Communities\Chanhassen\Letters\2019\Chanhassen 2040 CPU 21810-1 1stlncomplete.docx
April 12, 2019
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
City of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147
Chanhassen, MN 55317
RE: City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan - Incomplete for Review
Metropolitan Council Review File No. 21810-1
Metropolitan Council District 16, Council member Deb Barber
Dear Ms. Aanenson:
Thank you for your submission of the City of Chanhassen's 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan)
supplemental material received on March 11, 2019. The Metropolitan Council received the original
Plan on December 31, 2018. Council staff found that there are areas where the Plan remains
incomplete. Review of the Plan will be suspended until the additional information is submitted and
found complete for review. The following items are incomplete for review:
Potential Conformance Issue: Regional Wastewater Service and Land Use Policy
Although the land use analysis is unable to be completed, the Plan may not be reflecting
planned land uses at densities sufficient to be in conformance with regional wastewater
system plans and to be consistent with Emerging Suburban Edge Community Designation
land use policies. The Plan's calculations of average net residential density must use the
lowest allowable density from planned land use ranges.
In response to the Density Calculations comment in the Council's letter dated January 22,
2019, the supplemental information refers to preliminary review comments on the
forecasting methodology, that recommend using the midpoint of density ranges. There is a
distinction between planning for forecasted growth (which correctly uses the mid-point) and
meeting the City's required density minimums consistent with Council wastewater and land
use policies for Emerging Suburban Edge communities. The minimum value of the allowed
density range for residential land uses is applied in the land use analysis to ensure that,
even in a worst-case scenario at the lowest planned densities, the City meets the minimum
3-5 units per acre density required for Emerging Suburban Edge communities. We
apologize if there was confusion regarding the difference between forecast capacity and
minimum density requirements.
Response: Staff has revised Figure 2-4 to use the minimum density for each residential land use category as required. See
revised figure 2-4 below (p. 24):
FIGURE 2-4 | Net Developable Residential Acreage 2020-2040
Class Acres Minimum Density Units
Low Density Residential 817 1.2 980
Medium Density
Residential 186 4 744
High Density Residential 151 8 1,208
Mixed Use (Residential) 19 8 152
Regional/Lifestyle Center 48 10 480
Downtown 12 16 192
Totals 1,233 3.05 3,756
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 2
Wastewater (Roger Janzig, 651-602-1119)
Provide an electronic map or maps (GIS shape files or equivalent) showing the
following information for the existing sanitary sewer system:
• Existing connections points to the metropolitan disposal system
• Future connection points for new growth, if needed (P. 183)
• Intercommunity connections
Response: The City submitted maps via follow-up email
Provide a copy of intercommunity service agreements entered into with an adjoining community, or
language that confirms the Council's understanding that the communities reimburse each other for
the municipal wastewater charges that each will occur by receiving flow from the adjacent
community; including a map of areas covered by the agreement.
Response: City submitting the Eden Prairie Cooperative Agreement for your files. This area covers the Settlers West
Development in Chanhassen south of Pioneer Trail (CSAH 14) in the Eden Prairie boundary. We have added
language about cities’ reimbursement for wastewater charges as well as a map of the interconnection areas (p. 179)
• Provide a table or tables that include the local system information capacity and
design flows for existing trunk sewers.
o For local sanitary sewer lines 12" and larger that connect to a Metropolitan
Interceptor, provide the 2040 design flow and pipe capacity for each connecting
trunk sewer.
o Provide assignment of 2040 growth forecasts by Metropolitan interceptor facility. If
the City needs assistance delineating the service areas associated with the
interceptors below, Council staff can assist.
• 7017
• 7017-1
• 7017-2
• 7017-3.
• 7017-4
• 7138
• 7025-1
Response: The City will insert the following Map and table in Section 7.5, Future Sanitary Sewer System. (p. 169)
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 3
• Describe the requirements and standards in the City for minimizing inflow
and infiltration.
o Include a copy of the local ordinance or resolution that prohibits discharge from
sump pumps, foundation drains, and/or rain leaders to the sanitary sewer
Capacities of the sanitary sewers 12” and larger that discharge to an MCES Interceptor
Trunk Sewer
Location
Sanitary
Sewer Sub-
District
Diameter
(in)
Capacity
(gpm)
2040
Peak
Hourly
Flow
(gpm)
2040
Residual
Capacity
(gpm)
MN-7 MW-1 12 974 210 764
Washta Bay Rd MW-7 18 1,610 145 1,465
Chanhassen Rd NO-2 15 1,452 176 1,276
Ridge Rd NO-7 12 975 88 887
Lake Dr W LA-3 24 4,614 1,997 2,617
Majestic Way LA-6 12 883 583 300
Great Plains Blvd LR-4 21 3,185 3,070 115
Lake Dr E LL-7 12 746 132 614
W 78th St LL-7 15 1,403 36 1,367
W 78th St LL-7 18 3,616 501 3,115
July 2019
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 4
system.
o Include a copy of the local ordinance or resolution requiring the disconnection of
existing foundation drains, sump pumps, and roof leaders from the sanitary sewer
system.
Response: See Appendix C, Section 7.8, City Code Section 19-44
• Describe the sources, extent, and significance of existing inflow and infiltration in both
the municipal and private sewer systems.
o Include a summary of the extent of the systems that contributes to 1/1 such as
locations, quantities of piping or manholes, quantity of service laterals, or other
measures. If an analysis has not been completed, include a schedule and scope of
future system analysis.
o Include the measured or estimated amount of clearwater flow generated from the
public municipal and private sewer systems.
• For quantifying I/I, some communities have used the EPA guidance to determine the
annual I/I and peak month I/I
https://www3.epa.gov/region1/sso/pdfs/Guide4Estimatinglnfiltrationlnflow.pdf
• The method described in the Plan for quantifying clear water varies depending
on water usage rates and may not provide an accurate or reasonable
measurement of inflow or infiltration.
o Include a cost summary for remediating the I/I sources identified in the City. If
previous I/I mitigation work has occurred in the City, include a summary of flow
reductions and investments completed. If costs for mitigating I/I have not been
analyzed, include the anticipated wastewater service rates or other costs attributed
to inflow and infiltration.
• Describe the implementation plan for preventing and eliminating excessive inflow and
infiltration from entering both the municipal and private sewer systems.
o The Plan needs to include the strategy for implementing projects, activities, or
programs planned to mitigate excessive I/I from entering the municipal and private
sewer systems.
o A copy of the detailed I/I Capital Improvements Plan from the I/I Reduction Plan is
include_d in Appendix C. However, there is no information on the planned activities
or costs in Appendix C, which is required.
Response: The plan discusses I/I strategies on pages 161 – 163. Annually, we previously submitted work
programs to the Metropolitan Council. We could add them as an appendix to the Chapter, but are not sure
this is necessary since the Metropolitan Council already has them. The city discusses in this section what
projects are undertaken annually and for which we provide annual funding. However, we cannot tell, until
the study is completed if a specific work program should be developed.
We propose on adding the following language to the section on I/I regarding an I/I study shown in bold:
Infiltration is clear water that enters the sanitary sewer system through defects in the sewer pipes, joints,
manholes, and service laterals. Water that enters the sewer system from cross connections with storm sewer,
sump pumps, roof drains, or manhole covers is considered inflow. The City defines certain inflow as a
form of illicit discharge, defined by City Code of Ordinances Sec. 19-44. Section 19-44 does not allow
for certain types of cross connections by prohibiting direct or indirect discharges from roof drains,
sump pumps, unauthorized swimming pool discharges, cistern overflow pipes or other surface drain
connections to the sanitary sewer system. Any such connection found contributing to this inflow shall
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 5
be disconnected and the piping removed in accordance with the Ordinance.
The quantity of I/I entering a wastewater collection system can be estimated utilizing wastewater pumping
records, daily rainfall data and water usage characteristics flow data obtained from meters, such as the
meters MCES has in place to monitor the City’s sanitary flows. By taking the City’s base flows,
calculated as daily flows during winter months, and comparing them to the City’s average daily flows,
the amount of I/I collected in the City’s system can be estimated. Based on available MCES flow data,
the contribution of I/I to Chanhassen’s overall wastewater flow is approximately 13% from 2000-2017,
as seen from Figure 7-13.
Figure 7-13 Infiltration and Inflow Calculations
Year
Average
Daily
Flow
(Million
Gallons)
Base
Flow
(Million
Gallons)
Yearly I/I
Contribution
2012 1.459 1.368 6%
2013 1.630 1.352 17%
2014 1.624 1.303 20%
2015 1.395 1.154 17%
2016 1.715 1.481 14%
2017 1.724 1.613 6%
AVERAGE 13%
Water from inflow and infiltration can consume available capacity in the wastewater collection system and
increase the hydraulic load on the treatment facility. In extreme cases, the added hydraulic load can cause
bypasses or overflows of raw wastewater. This extra hydraulic load also necessitates larger capacity
collection and treatment components, which results in increased capital, operation and maintenance, and
replacement costs. As sewer system age and deteriorate, I/I can become an increasing problem. Therefore, it
is important that I/I be reduced whenever it is cost effective to do so.
The MCES has established wastewater flow goals for each community discharging wastewater into the
Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) based on average day flows and allowable peaking factors. These
enforced wastewater flow goals are aimed at reducing excessive I/I within the city’s sanitary sewer system
and also the MCES interceptor system. In February 2006, MCES adopted an I/I Surcharge Program which
requires communities within the MCES service area to reduce or minimize excessive I/I over a period of five
years. In the case that communities exceed the wastewater flow goals set by MCES during the five-year
surcharge period, the community will be assessed a surcharge for flows above the goal.
The City of Chanhassen was identified by the MCES as having excessive I/I during the development of the
I/I Surcharge Program. As part of the MCES surcharge program, the City of Chanhassen has the ability to
recover or avoid the imposed surcharges by investing in the repair and maintenance of the City sanitary
sewer system rather than paying surcharge amount directly to MCES, surcharges can be avoided. This
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 6
is done by taking official steps to reduce excess I/I through planned city (or private) fund expenditures that
meet MCES requirements. The investments into the sanitary sewer system are added up over a 5 year
work plan period, and at the end of the 5 year work plan if the total amount invested into the system
are equal to the surcharge amount, then the surcharge is considered paid. In addition, costs spent on
repair or reconstruction of the MCES interceptor may be directly credited to the City of Chanhassen’s
surcharge amount.
The City of Chanhassen’s goal is to abate I/I in a measurable manner: reducing wastewater flows such that
they are 75% or less than the water consumption. Figure 7.13 7-14 shows the percentage of wastewater to
water consumption for the last 17 years. From 2000 to 2006, six of the seven years monitored exceeded 75%.
Over the next five years two years exceeded the threshold. From 2012 to 2016 two years exceeded the 75%
threshold.
In the summer of 2006, the City completed an I/I study to assess the City’s sanitary sewer I/I and
implemented the I/I reduction program in response to the MCES program. Previous to the 2006 study,
the city conducted a sump pump inspection program in the late 1990s in an effort to eliminate illicit
discharges, and conducted a feasibility report for a sewage flow monitoring program in 2002 aimed at
achieving fair and equitable allocations of the wastewater treatment costs provided by MCES. Since
2006, the city has completed inspections, repairs, and upgrades to the public sanitary sewer system
with the goal of reducing I/I. The City on average has invested approximately $200,000 a year into I/I
abatement programs, and will continue to do so as seen from the 2019-2023 CIP in Figure 7-1.
While many improvements have been installed in the city’s public sanitary sewer system, MCES
metering and city lift station run time data shows that certain areas of the sanitary sewer system are
still experiencing I/I issues. This is why it is important for the City to continue investing in I/I
abatement. Also, MCES has stated that up to 80% of I/I can originate from private property
connections (illicit discharge, unmaintained systems, etc.).
Thus, the city is conducting a similar study to that performed in 2006 which focuses more heavily on
the impact private property connections have on the city’s overall I/I issue, and evaluates mitigation
options if a private I/I issue exists. Consultant engineering services have been contracted for this study
which will include: performing sewershed data review and providing a means for the collection of flow
data (i.e. metering); preparation of a report that summarizes the findings of the sewershed review and
flow data collected, including identifying critical areas contributing to I/I; and providing
recommendations to remediate infiltration and inflow issues for both private side and public
contributions. The final report will be completed in November 2019. The City will adjust its I/I
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 7
abatement efforts and future planning based on the report’s findings, along with continuing public
education and outreach on the importance of the issue and ways the public can help address I/I.
• The "Plan" cites, by reference, Appendix C where the sub-surface sewage treatment
systems (SSTS) management program is described, however Appendix C, actually
contains information relative to prohibited discharges to the sanitary sewer system and is
not related to SSTS management program(s). The Plan needs to describe the City's
management program for sub-surface sewage treatment systems (SSTS) to comply with
MPCA 7080 regulations.
Response: See page 154 - 155. The correct citation is Chapter 19, Article IV of the Chanhassen City
Code. We have summarized that this chapter provides regulation for the design and maintenance of
SSTS revisions shown in bold. (You were correct that Appendix C deals with I/I issues.)
On-site Disposal Systems
There are several areas within the City of Chanhassen that are currently on septic systems. Some of these areas
are developed with one or two acre lots that could be developed or subdivided with sanitary sewer service.
Figure 3.6 in Appendix A presents the lots which currently utilize septic systems. The areas are primarily located in the
districts south of the Highway 212 corridor. The remaining existing septic systems are scattered throughout the remainder
of the city in areas with larger lots. There are currently 388 Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) in the
community with 380 serving residential and eight serving commercial/industrial uses. Chapter 19, Article IV of the
Chanhassen City Code addresses SSTS, which provides regulation for the design and maintenance of SSTS.
(https://library.municode.com/mn/chanhassen/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CICO_CH19WASESEDI_ARTIVSUS
ETRSY )
SSTS are required to be pumped every three years. A compliance report must be completed upon the sale of a
home that is served by SSTS, unless one has been completed within the last three years.
• Include a map or maps (GIS shape files or equivalent) showing the location of sub-
surface sewage treatment systems and the location of nonconforming systems or
systems with problems.
Response: Map on 184.
Advisory Comments
Information in the Plan on the I/I program is dated and refers to documents from 2006. We
recommend reviewing the www.metrocouncil.org/iandi website and the Thrive MSP 2040
for current policy.
Land Use (Angela R. Torres, 651-602-1566)
• The total area for the City is not consistent between previous, current, and future
planning periods. The City explained in supplemental information that the existing land
use (2015) time period difference was a result of refinements in GIS and parcel data,
which is understandable. However; total area for the 2020 through 2040 planning
periods needs to match in Figure 2-6. Calculations for these planning periods should be
a result of more recent analysis. Year 2020 reflects the same land area as 2015. Please
update the 2020 column of Figure 2-6.
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 8
Response: Figures 2-6 (p. 26), 2-7 (p. 27) and 2-8 (p. 28) have been revised to match. Note that we have
also updated Table 6.2((p. 109) to address changes made to these figures. The total acreage listed in the
narrative text of section 2.5.2 (p. 28) and 2.5.4 (p. 32) has been revised to match the revisions in Figures 2-
6, 2-7, and 2-8.
• The supplemental information includes clarification that there are five (5) subdistricts
within the Commercial land use category, and describes definitions, allowable uses,
and potential zoning districts for each. Two subdistricts, Residential/Lifestyle Center
and Central Business District, permit residential uses. This information clarifies several
land use comments in the previous review letter. Some additional information is still
needed to meet minimum requirements for the land use analysis. The expected share
of residential use in the Commercial subdistrict, Central Business District, is required
as well as the minimum and maximum allowable density range and net residential
acres for the CBD. This allows the Council to adequately plan for regional services
and is required.
Response: Footnotes have been added to Figure 2-6 (p. 26), and the narrative text of section 2.7.1 (p.32 –
33) has been revised to note the expected residential share, a minimum density of 16 units an acre, and a
historical maximum density of 33 units an acre.
Additional footnotes for Figure 2-6 (P. 26 – 27)
1. Redevelopment within the downtown Central Business District, which is a zoning category of the commercial land
use, includes approximately 40 acres. Of this area, approximately 30 percent will incorporate a residential
component. Between 2015 and 2020, four acres redeveloped with 134 dwelling units and 19,000 square feet of retail
space. Between 2021 and 2030, approximately six acres will redevelop including housing. From 2031 to 2040, an
additional six acres may redevelop including housing.
2. (Vacant Commercial) Approximately 24 acres within the Avienda lifestyle development, which is dual guided for
commercial and office use, will be residential development. Approximately 15 acres will develop between 2021 and
2030 and nine acres will develop between 2031 and 2040.
3. (Vacant Office) Approximately 24 acres within the Avienda lifestyle development, which is dual guided for
commercial and office use, will be residential development. Approximately 15 acres will develop between 2021 and
2030 and nine acres will develop between 2031 and 2040.
The relevant portion of the revised Section 2.7.1 is provided below:
Land within City’s Central Business District subcategory is fully developed; however, as buildings approach
the end of their design life, opportunities for redevelopment will emerge. Staff expects that 40 acres within
this area will redevelop between 2021 and 2040, with 30 percent, 12 acres, of that redevelopment taking the
form of residential uses. Residential uses within this area will develop with a minimum density of 16 units an
acre. Maximum density is limited by performance standards; and, historically, residential uses with the
Central Business District have developed with densities between 23 and 33 units an acre. For projecting land
demand, and average density of 24 units an acre was used.
• The five subdistricts to the Commercial land use category need to either be added to
Figure 2-6 or a separate table so that acres and staging are associated with all land
uses.
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 9
Advisory Comments
• Currently, the Business Fringe District does not identify residential uses, although the
description includes discussion of the vision for future mixed-use development. If future
developments include residential uses, the City would need to request a Plan
amendment to accommodate residential uses.
Response: Since Business Fringe District is a zoning district and not a Commercial Land Use Subcategory,
staff has removed the Business Fringe District subsection to avoid confusion.
• The supplemental information refers to the five Commercial subdistricts inconsistently
as both zoning and land use categories. We assume that the Commercial subdistricts
are accurately interpreted as sub-land use categories given that the Plan states on page
32 "zoning districts within this land use category is CBD or BH." As land uses, most of
the land use requirements for these subdistricts are met, with the exception of items
mentioned above. If this is an incorrect assumption, contact Council staff to discuss.
Response: Staff has retitled Figure 2-11 (p. 31) and revised the narrative text (p. 32 – 34) to clarify that
these are subcategories of the commercial land use category. The revised text will read as follows:
2.7 | Commercial Land Use
Traditionally, the city has focused on directing commercial development into the Central Business District. This policy
has helped Chanhassen create and maintain a strong business community. However, between the city’s growth and the
realignment of Highway 212, the city has determined that there is a potential for significant commercial development
outside of the downtown core. In order to take advantage of this opportunity, the city guided land for Regional
Commercial use and is in the process of moving the Avienda regional lifestyle and mixed-use center through the approval
process. This development will significantly increase the amount of commercial real estate in the city, and will create a
second, complimentary, hub of commercial activity. Since 2008, the city has added over 300,000 square feet of
commercial uses.
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 10
Within the area guided for Commercial Land Use there a several distinct subcategories shown in Figure 2-11.The intent,
characteristics, and potential zoning of these subcategories are described in Sections 2.7.1 to 2.7.4.
2.7.1 | Central Business District
Definition/Vision:
The Central Business District subcategory is a compact walkable area featuring a wide variety of business, commercial,
office, and residential uses providing a comprehensive range of services at higher development densities than are present
elsewhere in the city.
The Central Business District is a dense concentration of jobs, services, housing, and civic uses. The city’s highest
density developments are located in the Central Business District. The scale of these developments is supported by
infrastructure such as the Chanhassen Transit Station.
The proximity of numerous commercial and civic uses accessible by attractive walking paths draws shoppers, visitors,
and residents to the area and promotes multiple trips between destinations. New developments in this area are encouraged
to complement the existing mix of uses and to contribute to maintaining a vibrant and active district over the course of an
extended day. Attention is also given to creating attractive and comfortable pedestrian links between varied uses within
the area as well as promoting a sense of place.
Goods and Services Examples:
» Residential (High Density) » Office » Entertainment (Restaurants, Theaters, Music Venues)
» Retail, Grocery, Household Goods and Services » Fitness Activities » Hotels » Health Services (Clinics)
Land within City’s Central Business District subcategory is fully developed; however, as buildings approach the end of
their design life, opportunities for redevelopment will emerge. Staff expects that 40 acres within this area will redevelop
between 2021 and 2040, with 30 percent, 12 acres, of that redevelopment taking the form of residential uses. Residential
uses within this area will develop with a minimum density of 16 units an acre. Maximum density is limited by
performance standards; and, historically, residential uses with the Central Business District have developed with densities
between 23 and 33 units an acre. For projecting land demand, and average density of 24 units an acre was used.
Zoning districts within this land use are CBD (Central Business District) or BH (Business Highway).
Previously, the BG (General Business District) zoning district was used within the area; however, these areas were
rezoned as CBD. The BG zoning classification is still the underlying zoning district for several PUDs within the Central
Business District.
2.7.2 | Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial
Definition/Vision:
The Neighborhood/Convenience Commercial subcategory is intended to host business that provide the daily goods and
services needed by residents or nearby employees. These areas are oriented towards smaller sites with direct access to
collector streets and are preferably located close to intersections of collector or arterial roads. These land uses are scaled
to be compatible with surrounding land uses, which are typically residential. Neighborhood/convenience commercial uses
should have a minimal impact on surrounding properties, as measured in terms of hours of operation, signage, and the
noise, light, and odors generated.
No single use in this district should exceed 10,000 square feet in gross built area.
Goods and Services Examples:
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 11
» Small to medium sized restaurants (no drive through windows)
» Dry Cleaning » Neighborhood Scale Health/Fitness Services
» Office » Day Care
» Neighborhood Scale Convenience Store » Gas Stations » Personal Services
The zoning application for this land use is BN (Neighborhood Business District)
or PUD (Planned Unit Development).
2.7.3 | Community and General Commercial
Definition/Vision:
The Community and General Commercial subcategory facilities large-scale commercial and office developments
requiring high visibility along arterial roads. This type of development has the capacity to generate enough light, noise,
and traffic to have a moderate impact on the surrounding areas.
These developments are located in areas with access to arterial streets, preferably at intersections with collector and
arterial streets, have moderate to large-sized sites, are within the MUSA, and have environmental features, such as soils
and topography, suitable for compact development. These projects must have adequate buffering by physical features or
adjacent compatible uses to protect nearby residential developments.
Goods and Services Examples:
» Furniture and Home Furnishings
» Electronic and Appliance Stores
» Building Material and Garden Supplies
» Auto Parts and Accessories
» Sporting Goods
Suitable areas will be zoned CC (Community Commercial) to facilitate this land use.
2.7.4 | Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial
Definition/Vision:
The Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial subcategory facilitates the creation of a regional destination featuring a highly
walkable commercial core complimented by residential and office uses.
A region center is a mixed commercial development with retail and entertainment uses of an appropriate scale to serve a
regional market. The development should be designed to serve pedestrian and mass transit users along with automobile
users. Its design should create an attractive and comfortable walking experience for visitors and residents establishing a
sense of place or destination. The center’s retail component should be integrated with its office and residential
components, with mindful transitions between land uses.
Goods and Services Examples:
» Entertainment
» Department Store
» Comparison Shopping
» Specialty Retail/Boutique
» Restaurants
» Hotels
» Residential
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 12
The city has dual guided 160 acres at the southeast corner of Powers and Lyman Boulevards as commercial and office to
allow for a potential regional/lifestyle center. The city projects that 30 percent, 48 acres, of land developed within the
Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial subcategory will develop for residential uses with net densities between 10 and 16
units. For projecting land demand, an average density of 13 units per acre was used. The City anticipates that 48 acres of
new residential development within the Regional/Lifestyle Center Commercial subcategory will occur between 2020 and
2040.
The zoning for this type of development is PUD-Regional Commercial.
Implementation (Angela R. Torres, 651-602-1566)
The Plan must include, at a minimum, a summary of the zoning category descriptions as
well as the current zoning map. Discussion in the Plan can explain that these are for
reference, printed on a specific date, and that the current version of the Zoning Code is
available online as suggested in the supplemental information. However, the information is
required as part of the Implementation plan. This can be included as an appendix and does
not have to be part of the land use chapter. Future changes to this information in the
appendix would not require a Plan amendment.
Response: Staff will provide a list of the zoning districts and Intent statements for each district with a link to the city
code and zoning map in an appendix to Chapter 10 (p. 296-301).
Housing (Tara Beard, 651-602-1051)
The supplemental information explains, and adds context to, the land use and housing
figures 2-6, 2-8 and 3-25 in a way that resolves incompleteness for the majority of the
Council's incompleteness comments.
However, to include the Regional/Lifestyle Center acres referenced in the housing chapter
as addressing Chanhassen's 2021-2030 affordable housing need, those acres and the
corresponding density must also be acknowledged in Figure 2-6. The housing chapter
indicates that the Regional/Lifestyle Center is located within the commercial land use
category, but Figure 2-6 indicates that 75 acres of commercial land will be developed
between 2021 and 2030; 30% of which is 22.5 acres. Figure 3-25 shows 36 acres available
for residential development within the Regional/Lifestyle Center. Figure 2-6 needs to show
which land use category is inclusive of the Regional/Lifestyle Center acres planned for
residential use consistent with Figure 3-25, for internal Plan information consistency, which
is required.
Response: Footnotes have been added to figure 2-6 (p. 26 – 27) clarifying the categorization and anticipated timeline of
development for land within the Regional/Lifestyle Center and Downtown subcategories. Figure 3-5 (p. 57) and its
associated narrative text have been revised as follows:
FIGURE 3-25 | Demonstrated Capacity to meet Affordable Housing Allocation
Capacity to Meet Affordable Housing Need Allocation
Land Use Category Vacant Acres Density (unites/acre) Total Units
High Density Residential 52 8 416
Mixed Use Primarily Residential 15 8 120
Regional/Lifestyle Center
Commercial 30 8 240
Downtown 6 8 48
Total 103 8 824
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 13
The city anticipates that 103 acres guided for residential uses with minimum densities of at least 8 units/acre will develop
between 2020 and 2030. These 103 acres are divided between 52 acres guided for high density residential land use which
has a density range of 8-16 units/acre, 15 acres guided for mixed use primarily residential which has a density range of 8-
20 units/acre, 30 acres guided for regional/lifestyle center which has a density range of 10-16 units/acre, and 6 acres of
downtown redevelopment with an expected density range of 16 to 33 units an acre.
OTHER ADVISORY INFORMATION
Council staff offer the following additional advisory comments for your consideration.
Transportation (Russ Owen, 615-602-1742)
• Consider replacing "B" arterial roadways with "other'' arterial roadways. This reference can
be found on page 122. This terminology change occurred with the most recent update of the
Transportation Policy Plan and although, not required at this time, would be consistent with
the updated TPP.
Response: The language has been revised. All “other” references had been revised previously.
• For clarity, consider adding a Figure number and a legend to the Map on page 131.
Response: Figure number and legend are added.
• The following routes serve Chanhassen and should be mentioned in the Plan: Routes
602, 690, 691, 692, 695, 698, and 699.
•
Response: Routes added with note that this was as of Dec. 2018. (p. 132)
• The City has two major transit facilities and should be mentioned in the Plan. The
Chanhassen park-ride served by 690, 692, 698 and 699; and the Southwest Village
park-ride served by 602, 690, 691, 695, 698 and 699.
Response: Routes from each Chanhassen Transit Facility were added with a note that this was as of Dec. 2018.
To expedite the Council's review of supplemental materials submitted in response to incomplete
items, please provide a cover memo that outlines where and how the incomplete items are
addressed in the new material.
After all the required elements of the Plan are submitted and found complete, the Council staff will
begin the official review process. Please contact Angela R. Torres, Sector Representative/
Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1566 or the listed technical staff, with any questions or for
additional assistance.
Sincerely,
LisaBeth Barajas, Director
Community Development
CC: Deb Barber, Metropolitan Council District 4
Angela R. Torres, Local Planning Assistance Manager
Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director
April 12, 2019
Page 14
Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator
N:\CommDev\LPA\Communities\Chanhassen\Letters\2019\Chanhassen 2040 CPU 21810-1-2ndlncomplete.doc
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject CDA Community and Economic Development Update 01152020
Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.1.
Prepared By Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community
Development Director
File No:
ATTACHMENTS:
CDA Community and Economic Development Update
CDA COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPI\iIENT UPDATE
CDA updates
CDA staff has recommended apprcval of the Community Development Strategy at this
week's board meeting.
CGPI 2020 winter round-applications and guidelines were sent January 6. Feel free to
reach out to set up a time to meet and discuss application ideas. I will also reech out
individually to each of you.
Our first quarterly community development roundtiable will be held Tuesday, March 10
from 2-3:30 p.m. GREATER MSP will be giving their "RFl Ready' pres€ntation and we
will also be talking about data needs. lf you would like to host let me know! lnvitations
will be sent this week.
Upcoming
meetings/
events
o APA MN Brown Ba istance from DEED (in person or webinar)
Tuesday, January 21 ftom '12:00-1:00 p.m. at Maplewood City Hall
Tim O'Neill from DEED will explain their data tools as well as services.
Reoional Solicitation Workshops for 2024-2025 oroiects
Tuesdey, January 28 or Friday, January 31
Learn about the regional solicltation process, available funding and eligible projects
APA MN Brown nclusionarv Housino (in p€rson or webinar)
Tuesday, February 11 from'12:00-1:00 p.m. Bloomington City Hall
St. Louis Park and Bloomington will share information about their inclusionary housing
ordinances.
CGPI application review and recommendation meeting
Tuesday, February 11 from 2:30-4:00 at the CDA offices
Meeting materials will be sent February 6 or 7 for those able to make the meeting
DEED has a call for sessions out for their Brownfields and Beyond: 2020 Minnesota
Redevelopment Conference until January 27. Leam more here.
Upcoming
grant
opportunities
DEED's Redevelooment Gra and Demolition Loan fundino.$4 million is available in
the February 2020 round- due February 3.
Note: lf you need assistance preparing applications, need data orjust want another set of
eyes to review, please don't hesitate to reach out.
Recent awards
Congratulations on the following awards!. City of Chaska-Metropolitan Council LCDA predevelopment funding
. CiV of Chaska-MnDOT Transportation Economic Development funding
Other items of
lnterest
2019 Open to Business ststistics are attached to this email. Attention now is on creating
an OTB marketing plan. The two iocus ateas are on gefting information on each city's
website as well as regular social media/newsletter articles. Attached is a January social
media post for your use (you can also share the CDA'S Linkedln oost or the Countv's
Facebook oost). lf you want something specific let us know and we can create it for youl
The SeiTechsoerience. through the Minnesotia High Tech Association, provides small
and mid-sized businesses matching funds for a STEM intern. Applications are open!
2020 US Census-ln March the first letters will be sent out and responses will be
gathered in March and April. lf a household does not respond, then census workers will
be doing further outreach. Data will be available at the state level by December.
DEED has rolled out a new certification program called Telecommuter Foruvard! Cities,
through an application and resolution, can apply for certification- The city then agrees to
support and commit to promoting the availabilily of telecommuting options.
(DA
tsrEElfrdFJanuary 15,2020
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Open to Business Carver County Update 12312019
Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.2.
Prepared By Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community
Development Director
File No:
ATTACHMENTS:
Open to Business Carver County Update 12312019
OPEN
tDtrr$rEt$
Up&tes
Carver County t2.3L.2OLg
Open to Business
3137 Chicago Ave
Minneapolis, MN 55407
6L2-843-3263
lndustry Segment:Clients Served:
Pre-Start Planning
Start-up
Existing Business- Opportu nity
Existing Business- Challenged
TotalClients:
Financing:
Retail
Service
Food
Health/Fitness
Construction/Real Estate
Wholesa le/Distribution
Technology
Professional Services
Referral Source:
10
8
30
6
54
5
13
10
6
L2
3
L
4
Approved:
Number
Amount
Leveraged
Program Hours:
l't QTR-
2na eTR_
3'd QTR-
4th QTR-
5
5435,ooo
S1,495,950
Bus.
0
10
11
0
L
2
6
5
4
5
18
Res.
0
11
13
0
L
2
5
2
8
3
L4
t2
3
5
2
99.00
113.75
L32.75
111.00
City:
Carver
Chanhassen
Chaska
Cologne
Hamburg
Mayer
NYA
Victoria
Waconia
Watertown
Total Contract-455.50
Municipality
Other Entrepreneur
Bank Referral
Family/Friend
Other
Web
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject Review of Claims Paid 02102020
Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.3.
Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:
SUMMARY
The following claims are submitted for review on February 10, 2020:
Check Numbers Amounts
172507 – 172568 $218,533.59
ACH Payments $204,323.12
Total All Claims $422,856.71
ATTACHMENTS:
Check Summary
Check Summary ACH
Check Detail
Check Detail ACH
Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
dwashburn
1/31/2020 10:23 AM
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
carcou Carver County 01/23/2020 0.00 21,884.65172507
CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/23/2020 0.00 1,144.94172508
MNFIRE MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD01/23/2020 0.00 240.00172509
ROERBRIA BRIAN ROERICK 01/23/2020 0.00 74.30172510
TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 01/23/2020 0.00 7,035.00172511
ALAINC Aladtec, Inc 01/23/2020 0.00 3,600.00172512
ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 01/23/2020 0.00 162.95172513
CenLin CenturyLink 01/23/2020 0.00 59.19172514
ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 01/23/2020 0.00 3,879.25172515
erigar Gary Erickson 01/23/2020 0.00 150.00172516
HeaPar HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 0.00 138,922.78172517
legtitle Legacy Title 01/23/2020 0.00 139.51172518
MNTITLE Minnesota Title 01/23/2020 0.00 130.95172519
MSSA MSSA 01/23/2020 0.00 100.00172520
NETTIT NETWORK TITLE INC 01/23/2020 0.00 72.63172521
NEWCOU NEW COUNTRY REMODELING 01/23/2020 0.00 250.00172522
PARTTITL PARTNERS TITLE LLC 01/23/2020 0.00 23.64172523
REARES REACH FOR RESOURCES 01/23/2020 0.00 9,540.57172524
SutJames James & Jessica Sutherland 01/23/2020 0.00 42.84172525
TRAADV TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL 01/23/2020 0.00 250.00172526
K2Ele K2 Electrical Services Inc 01/30/2020 0.00 305.00172527
MADGAL MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 01/30/2020 0.00 1,530.74172528
MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 01/30/2020 0.00 45.00172529
NEWSIG NEWMAN SIGNS INC 01/30/2020 0.00 539.45172530
PitBow Pitney Bowes Inc.01/30/2020 0.00 105.00172531
VALRIC VALLEY-RICH CO INC 01/30/2020 0.00 1,950.00172532
AARP AARP 01/30/2020 0.00 310.00172533
allpow All Powersports 01/30/2020 0.00 45.00172534
AMETIR AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 01/30/2020 0.00 391.28172535
ASPEQU Aspen Equipment 01/30/2020 0.00 656.85172536
BCATRA BCA 01/30/2020 0.00 150.00172537
BERCOF BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/30/2020 0.00 1,466.20172538
CARENV CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 01/30/2020 0.00 123.72172539
CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 01/30/2020 0.00 108.30172540
FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 01/30/2020 0.00 10.44172541
FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/30/2020 0.00 1,616.10172542
ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 01/30/2020 0.00 146.78172543
FlePri FleetPride, Inc.01/30/2020 0.00 138.37172544
GloEqu Global Equipment Company 01/30/2020 0.00 964.85172545
GYMWOR GYM WORKS INC 01/30/2020 0.00 670.00172546
HENCOU HENNEPIN COUNTY 01/30/2020 0.00 2,004.00172547
HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 01/30/2020 0.00 180.00172548
IROHAW IRONHAWK INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION01/30/2020 0.00 3,452.55172549
laksta Lake States Evergreen Company, LLC 01/30/2020 0.00 179.79172550
LinCon Lindus Construction Inc 01/30/2020 0.00 15.35172551
MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 01/30/2020 0.00 328.36172552
NEWSIG NEWMAN SIGNS INC 01/30/2020 0.00 342.30172553
Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/31/2020 10:23 AM)
Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount
NoaAcq Noah Acquisitions LLC 01/30/2020 0.00 21.10172554
NorAmerS North American Safety, Inc.01/30/2020 0.00 1,160.50172555
POST POSTMASTER 01/30/2020 0.00 1,237.86172556
PULPLU PULLTABS PLUS INC 01/30/2020 0.00 213.40172557
RobBeaIn Robert Bealke Industries 01/30/2020 0.00 800.00172558
sarljodi Jodi Sarles 01/30/2020 0.00 200.00172559
SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 01/30/2020 0.00 510.18172560
SILRUN Silent Run Adventures LLC 01/30/2020 0.00 400.00172561
SINNDON Don Sinniger 01/30/2020 0.00 30.00172562
pritan Priya Tandon 01/30/2020 0.00 400.00172563
THEIKEN KENNETH A THIES 01/30/2020 0.00 750.00172564
THUSPE Thul Specialty Contracting Inc 01/30/2020 0.00 4,975.00172565
UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 01/30/2020 0.00 11.92172566
UnitRent United Rentals (North America), Inc.01/30/2020 0.00 1,850.00172567
WIN911 WIN-911 01/30/2020 0.00 495.00172568
Report Total (62 checks): 218,533.59 0.00
Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/31/2020 10:23 AM)
Accounts Payable
Checks by Date - Summary by Check
User: dwashburn
Printed: 1/31/2020 3:20 PM
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
ACH Z-A1Secu A1 Security Camera LLC 01/16/2020
0.00 2,905.60
ACH Z-ALDI ALDI 01/16/2020 0.00 6.42
ACH Z-Amazon Amazon 01/16/2020
0.00 1,250.85
ACH Z-ACE AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EXERCISE 01/16/2020 0.00 199.50
ACH Z-AMELEG American Legion 01/16/2020 0.00 138.95
ACH Z-APPLE Apple.com 01/16/2020
0.00 0.99
ACH Z-Batplu Batteries Plus 01/16/2020
0.00 135.92
ACH Z-BLVDKI BLVD KITCHEN & BAR 01/16/2020 0.00 67.00
ACH Z-BOBSTE BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 01/16/2020 0.00 559.14
ACH Z-CAFTHY Cafe Thyme 01/16/2020
0.00 319.48
ACH Z-CARHAR Carhartt 01/16/2020
0.00 219.98
ACH Z-CarCou Carver County Environmental Center 01/16/2020
0.00 285.00
ACH Z-WINZIP CBI-WINZIP 01/16/2020
0.00 10.68
ACH Z-CHIMEX Chipotle Mexican Grill 01/16/2020
0.00 17.79
ACH z-corfee Corporate Card Annual Fee 01/16/2020
0.00 72.00
ACH Z-COSTCO Costco Wholesale 01/16/2020
0.00 139.14
ACH Z-CROCOL CROWN COLLEGE 01/16/2020 0.00 1,450.00
ACH Z-CUBFOO Cub Foods 01/16/2020
0.00 36.49
ACH Z-DELTA Delta Airlines 01/16/2020 0.00 30.00
ACH z-DicBBQ Dickey's Barbeque Pit 01/16/2020
0.00 132.15
ACH Z-DOLTRE Dollar Tree Stores Inc 01/16/2020 0.00 30.11
ACH Z-DOMINO Domino's Pizza 01/16/2020
0.00 27.74
ACH Z-ENAELE Enabling Elements Inc 01/16/2020 0.00 15.00
ACH Z-FACBOO Facebook 01/16/2020
0.00 40.00
ACH z-fasmea Fast Measure Distance 01/16/2020
0.00 (100.00)
ACH z-flefar Fleet Farm 01/16/2020
0.00 161.93
ACH Z-FORSUP Forestry Suppliers 01/16/2020
0.00 266.91
ACH Z-FULSOU Full Source 01/16/2020
0.00 162.88
ACH Z-GALLS Galls LLC 01/16/2020
0.00 220.49
ACH Z-HACCOM Hach Company 01/16/2020
0.00 934.17
ACH Z-HILHOT Hilton Hotels & Resorts 01/16/2020
0.00 10.43
ACH Z-HOMDEP Home Depot 01/16/2020
0.00 233.97
ACH Z-HOULIH Houlihan's 01/16/2020 0.00 97.79
ACH Z-IndSpr Indian Springs MFG Co 01/16/2020
0.00 896.59
ACH Z-INTCOD International Code Council 01/16/2020
0.00 558.50
ACH Z-INTSOC International Society of Arboriculture 01/16/2020
0.00 230.00
ACH z-jaunt Jaunt Services, Inc. 01/16/2020
0.00 45.88
ACH Z-KWITRI Kwik Trip 01/16/2020
0.00 12.34
ACH Z-LUNBYE Lunds & Byerly's 01/16/2020
0.00 170.69
ACH Z-LYNCAR Lynn Card Company 01/16/2020 0.00 75.14
ACH Z-MAKIT MakIt Products Inc 01/16/2020
0.00 56.00
ACH Z-MILNAM Militarynames.com 01/16/2020
0.00 16.60
ACH Z-OffMax Office Max/Office Depot 01/16/2020
0.00 271.18
ACH Z-PANBRE Panera Bread 01/16/2020
0.00 181.86
Page 1 of 3
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
ACH Z-PILDRY Pilgrim Dry Cleaners 01/16/2020
0.00 16.13
ACH z-post Postmaster 01/16/2020
0.00 13.65
ACH Z-PUMALA PumpAlarm.com 01/16/2020
0.00 207.60
ACH Z-REVDAN Revolution Dancewear 01/16/2020 0.00 3,426.70
ACH Z-ROTCLU Rotary Club 01/16/2020
0.00 53.00
ACH Z-SOUMET Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 01/16/2020
0.00 90.00
ACH Z-TARGET Target 01/16/2020
0.00 48.28
ACH Z-TAVERN Tavern 4&5 01/16/2020 0.00 51.00
ACH Z-TEQBUT TEQUILA BUTCHER 01/16/2020 0.00 63.00
ACH Z-THEGAR The Garden By The Woods 01/16/2020
0.00 94.49
ACH Z-UNDARM Under Armour 01/16/2020
0.00 899.82
ACH Z-UNOFMN University of Minnesota 01/16/2020
0.00 120.00
ACH Z-USreba US Bank Rebate 01/16/2020
0.00 (1,396.44)
ACH Z-WALMARWal-Mart 01/16/2020
0.00 150.24
ACH z-weftec Water Environment Federation 01/16/2020
0.00 40.00
ACH z-wyndha Wyndham Hotels and Resorts 01/16/2020
0.00 926.60
ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 01/23/2020 0.00 1,040.75
ACH carcou Carver County 01/23/2020
0.00 1,340.00
ACH Choice Choice, Inc. 01/23/2020
0.00 156.48
ACH avesis Fidelity Security Life 01/23/2020
0.00 190.49
ACH GILMEC GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 01/23/2020 0.00 445.00
ACH STICGREG GREG STICHA 01/23/2020
0.00 16.00
ACH HenPro Henning Professional Services, Inc 01/23/2020
0.00 3,109.16
ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/23/2020
0.00 299.59
ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 01/23/2020
0.00 3,423.32
ACH JOHSUP JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 01/23/2020 0.00 38.25
ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01/23/2020 0.00 45,339.86
ACH LigPla Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc. 01/23/2020
0.00 239.70
ACH MRPA MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 01/23/2020
0.00 25.00
ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/23/2020 0.00 130.90
ACH MobMin Mobile Mini, Inc 01/23/2020
0.00 1,620.00
ACH OPG-3 OPG-3, Inc 01/23/2020
0.00 16,130.00
ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/23/2020
0.00 117.13
ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 01/23/2020
0.00 12.30
ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 01/23/2020
0.00 7,054.47
ACH SafFas Safe-Fast, Inc. 01/23/2020
0.00 117.80
ACH STRGUA STRATOGUARD LLC 01/23/2020 0.00 176.00
ACH TBEI TBEI, Inc 01/23/2020
0.00 110.63
ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 0.00 13,355.18
ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/30/2020 0.00 4,250.00
ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 01/30/2020 0.00 978.75
ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 01/30/2020 0.00 39.78
ACH OLSOANNI Annika Olson 01/30/2020 0.00 175.00
ACH CARSWC CARVER SWCD 01/30/2020
0.00 962.50
ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/30/2020
0.00 99.16
ACH LARSDALE DALE LARSEN 01/30/2020 0.00 119.96
ACH engwat Engel Water Testing Inc 01/30/2020
0.00 500.00
ACH EnvSer EnviroTech Services Inc. 01/30/2020
0.00 585.00
ACH ESSBRO ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 01/30/2020
0.00 2,338.88
ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 01/30/2020 0.00 298.94
ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 01/30/2020 0.00 50.00
ACH H&LMES H & L Mesabi 01/30/2020
0.00 3,980.58
ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/30/2020
0.00 1,050.00
ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/30/2020
0.00 100.28
Page 2 of 3
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount
ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 01/30/2020
0.00 299.75
ACH thekno Knox Company 01/30/2020
0.00 912.00
ACH LYMLUM LYMAN LUMBER 01/30/2020
0.00 116.43
ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/30/2020 0.00 184.48
ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/30/2020
0.00 877.47
ACH NATRES NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC. 01/30/2020 0.00 5,715.00
ACH NeeFou Neenah Foundry Company Municipal 01/30/2020
0.00 984.29
ACH NusEqu Nuss Truck & Equipment 01/30/2020
0.00 212.69
ACH PRARES PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 01/30/2020
0.00 3,200.00
ACH DaniReem Reem Danial 01/30/2020
0.00 310.80
ACH SafVeh Safety Vehicle Solutions 01/30/2020
0.00 129.00
ACH STAPRO Stavros Properties 01/30/2020
0.00 253.49
ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/30/2020 0.00 43.29
ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 01/30/2020
0.00 139.93
ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020
0.00 25,868.85
ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 0.00 36,047.54
ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 01/30/2020 0.00 1,613.92
Report Total:0.00 204,323.12
Page 3 of 3
Accounts Payable
Check Detail-Checks
User: dwashburn
Printed: 01/31/2020 - 10:26 AM
Name Check Da Account Description Amount
AARP 01/30/2020 101-1560-4300 Driver Safety Refresher Course 310.00
AARP 310.00
Aladtec, Inc 01/23/2020 101-1220-4300 Online Employee Scheduling and workforce Mgt System 3,600.00
Aladtec, Inc 3,600.00
All Powersports 01/30/2020 101-1220-4120 Carb Kit 45.00
All Powersports 45.00
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 01/30/2020 101-1250-4140 Tires 391.28
AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS INC 391.28
Aspen Equipment 01/30/2020 101-1320-4120 Equipment 255.68
Aspen Equipment 01/30/2020 101-1550-4120 Equipment 89.04
Aspen Equipment 01/30/2020 101-1550-4120 Equipment 312.13
Aspen Equipment 656.85
ASPEN MILLS 01/23/2020 101-1220-4240 Clothing 119.20
ASPEN MILLS 01/23/2020 101-1220-4240 Clothing for Dan Martinez 43.75
ASPEN MILLS 162.95
BCA 01/30/2020 101-1120-4300 Criminal Background Investigation 150.00
BCA 150.00
BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/30/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies - Coffee 376.37
BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/30/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies - Coffee 1,089.83
BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 1,466.20
Carver County 01/23/2020 101-1210-4300 4th Qtr 2019 Police Contract Overtime 21,884.65
Carver County 21,884.65
CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 01/30/2020 700-0000-4350 Waste Removal 123.72
CARVER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL 123.72
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/23/2020 101-1220-4320 Monthly Charges 798.34
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/23/2020 101-1530-4320 Monthly Charges 269.61
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/23/2020 101-1171-4320 Monthly Charges 76.99
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/31/2020 - 10:26 AM)Page 1 of 6
Name Check Da Account Description Amount
CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,144.94
CenturyLink 01/23/2020 700-7043-4310 Waste Water Bldg 59.19
CenturyLink 59.19
Compass Minerals America, Inc 01/23/2020 101-1320-4150 Materials 3,879.25
Compass Minerals America, Inc 3,879.25
CORE & MAIN LP 01/30/2020 700-0000-4150 Richardson Valve Box 108.30
CORE & MAIN LP 108.30
Erickson Gary 01/23/2020 101-1560-4300 Senior Center Music Program - Jan 2020 150.00
Erickson Gary 150.00
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 01/30/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts 10.44
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 10.44
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/30/2020 700-7019-4510 Drain Grate 1,616.10
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 1,616.10
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 01/30/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 146.78
Ferguson Waterworks #2518 146.78
FleetPride, Inc.01/30/2020 101-1370-4170 Fluid 138.37
FleetPride, Inc. 138.37
Global Equipment Company 01/30/2020 700-0000-4530 Paint 964.85
Global Equipment Company 964.85
GYM WORKS INC 01/30/2020 101-1530-4530 Fitness Equipment Repair 270.00
GYM WORKS INC 01/30/2020 101-1530-4530 January Preventive Maintenance 400.00
GYM WORKS INC 670.00
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 101-0000-2012 January - Family 34,394.79
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 101-0000-2012 January - Family 1,582.10
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 210-0000-2012 January - Family 395.53
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 700-0000-2012 January - Family 4,509.01
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 701-0000-2012 January - Family 4,509.01
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 720-0000-2012 January - Family 2,072.56
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 101-0000-2012 January - Single 17,187.06
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 210-0000-2012 January - Single 633.04
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 700-0000-2012 January - Single 2,769.54
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 701-0000-2012 January - Single 1,503.46
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 720-0000-2012 January - Single 696.34
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 101-0000-2012 February - Family 32,812.69
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 101-0000-2012 February - Family 1,582.10
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/31/2020 - 10:26 AM)Page 2 of 6
Name Check Da Account Description Amount
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 210-0000-2012 February - Family 395.53
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 700-0000-2012 February - Family 4,509.01
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 701-0000-2012 February - Family 4,509.01
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 720-0000-2012 February - Family 2,072.56
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 101-0000-2012 February - Single 17,187.06
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 210-0000-2012 February - Single 633.04
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 700-0000-2012 February - Single 2,769.54
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 701-0000-2012 February - Single 1,503.46
HealthPartners, Inc.01/23/2020 720-0000-2012 February - Single 696.34
HealthPartners, Inc. 138,922.78
HENNEPIN COUNTY 01/30/2020 101-0000-3010 December 2019 Over Settlement 1,915.49
HENNEPIN COUNTY 01/30/2020 420-0000-3010 December 2019 Over Settlement 3.73
HENNEPIN COUNTY 01/30/2020 369-0000-3010 December 2019 Over Settlement 18.40
HENNEPIN COUNTY 01/30/2020 601-0000-3010 December 2019 Over Settlement 15.27
HENNEPIN COUNTY 01/30/2020 400-0000-3010 December 2019 Over Settlement 32.05
HENNEPIN COUNTY 01/30/2020 370-0000-3010 December 2019 Over Settlement 19.06
HENNEPIN COUNTY 2,004.00
Hoops & Threads LLC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4240 City of Chan Utilities Dept 54.00
Hoops & Threads LLC 01/30/2020 700-0000-4240 City of Chan Utilities Dept 54.00
Hoops & Threads LLC 01/30/2020 700-0000-4240 City Logo on Jackets 27.00
Hoops & Threads LLC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4240 City Logo on Jackets 27.00
Hoops & Threads LLC 01/30/2020 101-1320-4240 City of Chan Engineering Logo 18.00
Hoops & Threads LLC 180.00
IRONHAWK INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION01/30/2020 101-1320-4120 Plowing Equipment 3,452.55
IRONHAWK INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION 3,452.55
K2 Electrical Services Inc 01/30/2020 101-1550-4300 Wiring new electric heater 305.00
K2 Electrical Services Inc 305.00
Lake States Evergreen Company, LLC 01/30/2020 720-7202-4120 Arbor Day Seedlings 179.79
Lake States Evergreen Company, LLC 179.79
Legacy Title 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 41.26
Legacy Title 01/23/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 79.84
Legacy Title 01/23/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.25
Legacy Title 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.16
Legacy Title 139.51
Lindus Construction Inc 01/30/2020 101-0000-2033 Overpayment - Permit 2020-00165 - 6801 Manchester Drive 15.35
Lindus Construction Inc 15.35
MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 01/30/2020 101-1140-4302 Legal Services through 12.31.19 1,530.74
MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 1,530.74
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/31/2020 - 10:26 AM)Page 3 of 6
Name Check Da Account Description Amount
McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 01/30/2020 101-1220-4130 Blanket, Stretcher 55.00
McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 01/30/2020 101-1220-4130 Mask, Bag, Oximeter 273.36
McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 328.36
Minnesota Title 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 28.73
Minnesota Title 01/23/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 70.90
Minnesota Title 01/23/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 27.64
Minnesota Title 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.68
Minnesota Title 130.95
MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD01/23/2020 101-1220-4300 Firefighter II Certificiation Exam - Elijah B, Mollie T 240.00
MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 240.00
MN Pollution Control Agency 01/30/2020 701-0000-4370 Jacob Casebeer - Class SD Test 45.00
MN Pollution Control Agency 45.00
MSSA 01/23/2020 101-1320-4360 2020 Renewal 100.00
MSSA 100.00
NETWORK TITLE INC 01/23/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 45.64
NETWORK TITLE INC 01/23/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.97
NETWORK TITLE INC 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 23.02
NETWORK TITLE INC 72.63
NEW COUNTRY REMODELING 01/23/2020 815-8202-2024 8080 Marsh Drive 250.00
NEW COUNTRY REMODELING 250.00
NEWMAN SIGNS INC 01/30/2020 101-1320-4560 Signs 539.45
NEWMAN SIGNS INC 01/30/2020 101-1320-4560 No Parking Sign 342.30
NEWMAN SIGNS INC 881.75
Noah Acquisitions LLC 01/30/2020 101-0000-2033 Overpayment refund - Permit 2020-00160 - 810 North Lilac Drive 21.10
Noah Acquisitions LLC 21.10
North American Safety, Inc.01/30/2020 701-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 580.25
North American Safety, Inc.01/30/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 580.25
North American Safety, Inc. 1,160.50
PARTNERS TITLE LLC 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.13
PARTNERS TITLE LLC 01/23/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.14
PARTNERS TITLE LLC 01/23/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.19
PARTNERS TITLE LLC 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.20
PARTNERS TITLE LLC 01/23/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.97
PARTNERS TITLE LLC 01/23/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.72
PARTNERS TITLE LLC 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.29
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/31/2020 - 10:26 AM)Page 4 of 6
Name Check Da Account Description Amount
PARTNERS TITLE LLC 23.64
Pitney Bowes Inc.01/30/2020 101-1120-4410 Postage Machine 105.00
Pitney Bowes Inc. 105.00
POSTMASTER 01/30/2020 700-0000-4330 Permit 14 466.21
POSTMASTER 01/30/2020 701-0000-4330 Permit 14 466.21
POSTMASTER 01/30/2020 700-0000-4330 Permit 14 152.72
POSTMASTER 01/30/2020 701-0000-4330 Permit 14 152.72
POSTMASTER 1,237.86
PULLTABS PLUS INC 01/30/2020 101-1560-4130 Bingo Supplies 53.69
PULLTABS PLUS INC 01/30/2020 101-1560-4130 Bingo Supplies 159.71
PULLTABS PLUS INC 213.40
REACH FOR RESOURCES 01/23/2020 101-1600-4300 2020 Recreation Contracts 9,540.57
REACH FOR RESOURCES 9,540.57
Robert Bealke Industries 01/30/2020 101-1611-4300 Feb Fest DJ Services 2/1 800.00
Robert Bealke Industries 800.00
ROERICK BRIAN 01/23/2020 101-1370-4240 Clothing Allowance 74.30
ROERICK BRIAN 74.30
Sarles Jodi 01/30/2020 101-0000-1028 Showcase Change 200.00
Sarles Jodi 200.00
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 01/30/2020 701-0000-4150 Paint 510.18
SHERWIN WILLIAMS 510.18
Silent Run Adventures LLC 01/30/2020 101-1611-4300 Feb Fest Dog Sled Rides 400.00
Silent Run Adventures LLC 400.00
Sinniger Don 01/30/2020 101-1320-4150 Damaged Mailbox 30.00
Sinniger Don 30.00
Sutherland James & Jessica 01/23/2020 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 27.94
Sutherland James & Jessica 01/23/2020 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.46
Sutherland James & Jessica 01/23/2020 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.44
Sutherland James & Jessica 42.84
Tandon Priya 01/30/2020 101-0000-1027 Feb Fest Ticket Change 400.00
Tandon Priya 400.00
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/31/2020 - 10:26 AM)Page 5 of 6
Name Check Da Account Description Amount
Taylor Electric Company, LLC 01/23/2020 101-1350-4565 Street Light Repair 3,260.00
Taylor Electric Company, LLC 01/23/2020 101-1350-4565 Street Light Repair 3,775.00
Taylor Electric Company, LLC 7,035.00
THIES KENNETH A 01/30/2020 101-1611-4300 Horse Drawn Wagon Rides - Feb Fest 750.00
THIES KENNETH A 750.00
Thul Specialty Contracting Inc 01/30/2020 701-0000-4551 Install Drop Pipe 4,975.00
Thul Specialty Contracting Inc 4,975.00
TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL 01/23/2020 101-1611-4130 Feb Fest Fish Prize Travel Certificate 250.00
TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL 250.00
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 01/30/2020 700-0000-4330 Postage 11.92
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 11.92
United Rentals (North America), Inc.01/30/2020 701-0000-4530 Concrete Mixer 1,850.00
United Rentals (North America), Inc. 1,850.00
VALLEY-RICH CO INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4551 9351 Kiowa Trail 1,950.00
VALLEY-RICH CO INC 1,950.00
WIN-911 01/30/2020 700-0000-4530 Annual Maintenance 495.00
WIN-911 495.00
218,533.59
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/31/2020 - 10:26 AM)Page 6 of 6
Accounts Payable
Check Detail-ACH
User: dwashburn
Printed: 01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM
Name Check D Account Description Amount
A1 Security Camera LLC 01/16/2020 700-0000-4510 Replacement Cameras Well 3 2,905.60
A1 Security Camera LLC 2,905.60
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/30/2020 700-0000-4300 Project P05126-2019-006 - software and hosting mainenance 4,250.00
Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 4,250.00
ALDI 01/16/2020 720-7201-4370 EC MEETING SUPPLIES 6.42
ALDI 6.42
ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 01/30/2020 101-1220-4530 Compressor Service and Air Quality Test, Station 1 978.75
ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 978.75
Al-Hilwani Juli 01/30/2020 101-1533-4300 Personal Training 243.75
Al-Hilwani Juli 01/30/2020 101-1539-4300 Personal Training 56.00
Al-Hilwani Juli 299.75
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1530-4120 FITNESS CTR EQUIPMENT 35.31
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1220-4240 SHIRTS 89.98
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1530-4120 CLOCK 16.18
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1806-4130 WHISTLES 8.76
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1530-4120 GYM EQUIPMENT 46.24
Amazon 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing Return -50.00
Amazon 01/16/2020 701-0000-4240 American Flag Patch 8.37
Amazon 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 American Flag Patch 8.37
Amazon 01/16/2020 701-0000-4120 Battery Stick 48.60
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 26.83
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 13.83
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 126.63
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 13.80
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1160-4150 Maintenance/cables 20.98
Amazon 01/16/2020 400-4126-4530 Replacement TV Eng Conf Room 279.99
Amazon 01/16/2020 400-4126-4530 TV Mount Eng Conf Rm/ Fan for Fountain Conf Cabinet overheating 48.98
Amazon 01/16/2020 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 306.98
Amazon 01/16/2020 101-1160-4300 Fees for Services 0.47
Amazon 01/16/2020 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 159.35
Amazon 01/16/2020 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 33.59
Amazon 01/16/2020 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 57.60
Amazon 01/16/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing Return -49.99
Amazon 1,250.85
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 1 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EXERCISE 01/16/2020 101-1530-4370 TRAINING 199.50
AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EXERCISE 199.50
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus01/30/2020 101-0000-2008 January 2020 39.78
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78
American Legion 01/16/2020 101-1120-4370 BREAKFAST MEETING 28.00
American Legion 01/16/2020 101-1560-4370 SENIOR CENTER YEAR END BUDGET MEETING 110.95
American Legion 138.95
Apple.com 01/16/2020 700-0000-4310 iCloud Storage 0.99
Apple.com 0.99
Batteries Plus 01/16/2020 101-1160-4530 Repair and maintenance 135.92
Batteries Plus 135.92
BLVD KITCHEN & BAR 01/16/2020 101-1120-4370 LUNCH MEETING 67.00
BLVD KITCHEN & BAR 67.00
BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 01/16/2020 101-1220-4370 FOUR VEHICLES - DEPARTMENT TRAINING 559.14
BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 559.14
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 01/23/2020 601-6039-4752 City Proj No 18-02 1,040.75
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1,040.75
Cafe Thyme 01/16/2020 720-7201-4370 EC MEETING SUPPLIES 171.26
Cafe Thyme 01/16/2020 101-1110-4370 City Council Dinner 148.22
Cafe Thyme 319.48
Carhartt 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 219.98
Carhartt 219.98
Carver County 01/23/2020 700-7043-4320 WWTP - Well 3 Annual Fiber Maintenance 375.00
Carver County 01/23/2020 700-7043-4320 CarverLink Fiber- WWTP & Well 3 Jan 425.00
Carver County 01/23/2020 101-1160-4320 CarverLink Internet / Fiber 540.00
Carver County 1,340.00
Carver County Environmental Center 01/16/2020 720-7201-4300 Recycling Center 285.00
Carver County Environmental Center 285.00
CARVER SWCD 01/30/2020 400-0000-1155 The Parks, Mission Hills and Foxwood monitoring/Inspections 962.50
CARVER SWCD 962.50
CBI-WINZIP 01/16/2020 101-1160-4220 Software Licenses Hardware License and Support Renewals 10.68
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 2 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
CBI-WINZIP 10.68
Chipotle Mexican Grill 01/16/2020 101-1220-4290 CREW DINNER 17.79
Chipotle Mexican Grill 17.79
Choice, Inc.01/23/2020 101-1220-4350 Work Completed 11/11 - 12/06 156.48
Choice, Inc. 156.48
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/30/2020 101-0000-2008 January 2020 60.72
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/30/2020 700-0000-2008 January 2020 19.22
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/30/2020 701-0000-2008 January 2020 19.22
Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 99.16
Corporate Card Annual Fee 01/16/2020 101-1130-4300 CORPORATE CARD ANNUAL FEE - STEVE FERRARO 12.00
Corporate Card Annual Fee 01/16/2020 101-1130-4300 CORPORATE CARD ANNUAL FEE - CODY PRIBBLE 12.00
Corporate Card Annual Fee 01/16/2020 101-1130-4300 CORPORATE CARD ANNUAL FEE - ERIC TESSMAN 12.00
Corporate Card Annual Fee 01/16/2020 101-1130-4300 CORPORATE CARD ANNUAL FEE - ERIK HENDRICKSEN 12.00
Corporate Card Annual Fee 01/16/2020 101-1130-4300 CORPORATE CARD ANNUAL FEE - PRIYA TANDON 12.00
Corporate Card Annual Fee 01/16/2020 101-1130-4300 CORPORATE CARD ANNUAL FEE - GEORGE BENDER 12.00
Corporate Card Annual Fee 72.00
Costco Wholesale 01/16/2020 101-1560-4130 HOLIDAY PARTY - CUPS, WATER 24.21
Costco Wholesale 01/16/2020 101-1560-4130 HOLIDAY PARTY - DESSERT COOKIES 114.93
Costco Wholesale 139.14
CROWN COLLEGE 01/16/2020 101-1220-4370 EMT COURSE 1,450.00
CROWN COLLEGE 1,450.00
Cub Foods 01/16/2020 101-1550-4120 SNOW SHOVELS - CITY HALL 36.49
Cub Foods 36.49
Danial Reem 01/30/2020 101-1539-4300 Zumba Class 310.80
Danial Reem 310.80
Delta Airlines 01/16/2020 101-1220-4370 baggage fees 30.00
Delta Airlines 30.00
Dickey's Barbeque Pit 01/16/2020 101-1110-4370 Council Dinner 132.15
Dickey's Barbeque Pit 132.15
Dollar Tree Stores Inc 01/16/2020 101-1560-4130 HOLIDAY PARTY TABLECOVER 30.11
Dollar Tree Stores Inc 30.11
Domino's Pizza 01/16/2020 101-1538-4130 GIFT MAKING 27.74
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 3 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
Domino's Pizza 27.74
Enabling Elements Inc 01/16/2020 700-0000-4310 Broad Band Internet Service 15.00
Enabling Elements Inc 15.00
Engel Water Testing Inc 01/30/2020 700-0000-4300 25 Water Samples - January 2020 500.00
Engel Water Testing Inc 500.00
EnviroTech Services Inc.01/30/2020 101-1320-4150 Materials 585.00
EnviroTech Services Inc. 585.00
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4551 Aqua Seal 12 Tubes 2,177.00
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4551 Aqua Seal Static Mixer 161.88
ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 2,338.88
Facebook 01/16/2020 101-1530-4375 ARTISAN FAIR AD 40.00
Facebook 40.00
Fast Measure Distance 01/16/2020 101-1310-4120 Measuring equipment - chose different model -100.00
Fast Measure Distance -100.00
FASTENAL COMPANY 01/30/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 94.94
FASTENAL COMPANY 01/30/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts 204.00
FASTENAL COMPANY 298.94
Fidelity Security Life 01/23/2020 101-0000-2007 Insurance 167.68
Fidelity Security Life 01/23/2020 210-0000-2007 Insurance -3.98
Fidelity Security Life 01/23/2020 700-0000-2007 Insurance 8.95
Fidelity Security Life 01/23/2020 701-0000-2007 Insurance 15.07
Fidelity Security Life 01/23/2020 720-0000-2007 Insurance 2.77
Fidelity Security Life 190.49
Fleet Farm 01/16/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing 54.73
Fleet Farm 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing -8.75
Fleet Farm 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 34.99
Fleet Farm 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 54.73
Fleet Farm 01/16/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing 34.98
Fleet Farm 01/16/2020 701-0000-4240 Clothing -8.75
Fleet Farm 161.93
Forestry Suppliers 01/16/2020 720-7202-4300 POLE PRUNERS 192.22
Forestry Suppliers 01/16/2020 101-1250-4120 SAFETY VEST 74.69
Forestry Suppliers 266.91
Full Source 01/16/2020 701-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 81.44
Full Source 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 81.44
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 4 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
Full Source 162.88
Galls LLC 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing 220.49
Galls LLC 220.49
GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 01/23/2020 700-0000-4530 Annual Billing for HVAC Preventive Maintenance 445.00
GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 445.00
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 01/30/2020 400-0000-4300 2020 Annual Facility Operator Fee 50.00
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 50.00
H & L Mesabi 01/30/2020 101-1320-4120 Parts 3,980.58
H & L Mesabi 3,980.58
Hach Company 01/16/2020 700-7019-4120 Chemicals 934.17
Hach Company 934.17
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/30/2020 700-7043-4160 Chlorine 1,050.00
HAWKINS CHEMICAL 1,050.00
Henning Professional Services, Inc 01/23/2020 605-6501-4300 TH 101 From CSAH 61 to CSAH 14. Proj 14-08 3,109.16
Henning Professional Services, Inc 3,109.16
Hilton Hotels & Resorts 01/16/2020 101-1220-4370 breakfast 10.43
Hilton Hotels & Resorts 10.43
Home Depot 01/16/2020 101-1220-4260 AIRBLOWER FOR TURN OUT DRYER 169.89
Home Depot 01/16/2020 101-1560-4130 HOLIDAY PARTY DECOR - POINSETTIA 12.76
Home Depot 01/16/2020 101-1560-4130 HOLIDAY PARTY DECOR - POINSETTIA 12.76
Home Depot 01/16/2020 101-1560-4130 HOLIDAY PARTY DECOR - POINSETTIA 6.38
Home Depot 01/16/2020 701-0000-4260 Socket Set 32.18
Home Depot 233.97
Houlihan's 01/16/2020 101-1510-4370 PARK AND REC COMMISSION MEETING 97.79
Houlihan's 97.79
Indian Springs MFG Co 01/16/2020 700-0000-4260 Equipment 896.59
Indian Springs MFG Co 896.59
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/30/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 63.46
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/23/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 6.28
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/23/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 293.31
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/30/2020 101-1170-4110 Coffee Supplies 36.82
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 5 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
Innovative Office Solutions LLC 399.87
International Code Council 01/16/2020 101-1250-4370 2018 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE STUDY 78.50
International Code Council 01/16/2020 101-1220-4370 Training 480.00
International Code Council 558.50
International Society of Arboriculture 01/16/2020 720-7202-4360 ARBORIST RE-CERTIFICATION 230.00
International Society of Arboriculture 230.00
Jaunt Services, Inc.01/16/2020 101-1220-4370 shuttle 45.88
Jaunt Services, Inc. 45.88
JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 01/23/2020 400-4135-4704 Combo Pkg 3,423.32
JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 3,423.32
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 01/23/2020 101-1190-4530 Flame Sensor 38.25
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 38.25
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01/23/2020 400-0000-1155 Dev Field Observ 15,891.00
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01/23/2020 605-6501-4300 TH 101 Reconstruction Project 14-08 29,448.86
KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 45,339.86
Knox Company 01/30/2020 400-4127-4705 KeySecure 912.00
Knox Company 912.00
Kwik Trip 01/16/2020 701-0000-4170 Gas 6.14
Kwik Trip 01/16/2020 700-0000-4170 Gas 6.20
Kwik Trip 12.34
LARSEN DALE 01/30/2020 101-1320-4240 Clothing Allowance 119.96
LARSEN DALE 119.96
Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc.01/23/2020 101-1370-4510 Light Fixture Lens 239.70
Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc. 239.70
Lunds & Byerly's 01/16/2020 101-1560-4375 VOLUNTEER GIFTS/PROMOTIONAL GIFTS 88.71
Lunds & Byerly's 01/16/2020 101-1110-4370 1st Responder Cake 81.98
Lunds & Byerly's 170.69
LYMAN LUMBER 01/30/2020 101-1320-4150 Lumber 116.43
LYMAN LUMBER 116.43
Lynn Card Company 01/16/2020 101-1220-4290 CARDS 75.14
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 6 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
Lynn Card Company 75.14
MakIt Products Inc 01/16/2020 101-1538-4130 HOLIDAY GIFT MAKING 56.00
MakIt Products Inc 56.00
Militarynames.com 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Sew On Lettering 16.60
Militarynames.com 16.60
MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.01/23/2020 101-1600-4340 Job Posting 25.00
MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 25.00
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/30/2020 101-1350-4320 Kiowa Trl & St Hwy 101 Lights 29.25
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/30/2020 101-1350-4320 Bandimere Park Lights 155.23
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/23/2020 101-1350-4320 Bluff Crk & Flying Cloud Dr 130.90
MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 315.38
Mobile Mini, Inc 01/23/2020 101-1617-4410 Warming Houses 540.00
Mobile Mini, Inc 01/23/2020 101-1617-4410 Warming Houses 540.00
Mobile Mini, Inc 01/23/2020 101-1617-4410 Warming Houses 540.00
Mobile Mini, Inc 1,620.00
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/30/2020 101-1320-4140 Fuse 4.15
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/30/2020 101-1320-4120 Oil 106.00
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/30/2020 101-1320-4140 Winter Blades 7.99
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/30/2020 701-0000-4140 Wheel Seal 113.08
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/30/2020 701-0000-4140 Brakes 538.71
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/30/2020 101-1550-4120 Oil 107.54
NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 877.47
NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC.01/30/2020 210-0000-4300 National Community Survey 5,715.00
NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC. 5,715.00
Neenah Foundry Company Municipal 01/30/2020 101-1320-4530 Grate 167.00
Neenah Foundry Company Municipal 01/30/2020 101-1320-4530 Solid Platen LD 817.29
Neenah Foundry Company Municipal 984.29
Nuss Truck & Equipment 01/30/2020 101-1320-4140 Gasket 20.01
Nuss Truck & Equipment 01/30/2020 101-1320-4140 Slack Adjusted 192.68
Nuss Truck & Equipment 212.69
Office Max/Office Depot 01/16/2020 701-0000-4530 Battery 107.28
Office Max/Office Depot 01/16/2020 101-1160-4150 Maintenance/cables 65.60
Office Max/Office Depot 01/16/2020 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 98.30
Office Max/Office Depot 271.18
Olson Annika 01/30/2020 101-1538-4300 Safe Kids Training Instruction 175.00
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 7 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
Olson Annika 175.00
OPG-3, Inc 01/23/2020 400-4117-4703 Laserfiche Annual License - Support Renew 16,130.00
OPG-3, Inc 16,130.00
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/23/2020 701-0000-4140 Blower Motor 86.09
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/23/2020 700-0000-4520 Car Wax 15.52
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/23/2020 701-0000-4520 Car Wax 15.52
O'Reilly Automotive Inc 117.13
Panera Bread 01/16/2020 101-1110-4370 City Council Dinner 181.86
Panera Bread 181.86
Pilgrim Dry Cleaners 01/16/2020 700-0000-4240 Sew on Name Tape/Jacket 16.13
Pilgrim Dry Cleaners 16.13
Postmaster 01/16/2020 815-8221-2024 Beehive Homes - certified mail 13.65
Postmaster 13.65
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 01/30/2020 720-7202-4300 Water Treatment Plant Buckthorn Removal 3,200.00
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 3,200.00
Premium Waters, Inc 01/23/2020 101-1550-4120 Water Service 12.30
Premium Waters, Inc 12.30
PumpAlarm.com 01/16/2020 700-0000-4530 Equipment 207.60
PumpAlarm.com 207.60
RBM SERVICES INC 01/23/2020 101-1190-4350 Janitorial Service 3,471.10
RBM SERVICES INC 01/23/2020 101-1170-4350 Janitorial Service 3,583.37
RBM SERVICES INC 7,054.47
Revolution Dancewear 01/16/2020 101-1535-4130 DANCE COSTUMES 3,426.70
Revolution Dancewear 3,426.70
Rotary Club 01/16/2020 101-1520-4360 ROTARY CLUB 53.00
Rotary Club 53.00
Safe-Fast, Inc.01/23/2020 101-1320-4370 Safety Gear 117.80
Safe-Fast, Inc. 117.80
Safety Vehicle Solutions 01/30/2020 101-1220-4140 Vehicle Supplies 129.00
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 8 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
Safety Vehicle Solutions 129.00
Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 01/16/2020 101-1120-4370 THREE LUNCH ATTENDEES 90.00
Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 90.00
Stavros Properties 01/30/2020 101-1171-4300 Q4 2019 Easement Fees 253.49
Stavros Properties 253.49
STICHA GREG 01/23/2020 101-1130-4370 SRA Lunch 16.00
STICHA GREG 16.00
STRATOGUARD LLC 01/23/2020 101-1160-4300 Proofpoint Email Filtering Service 176.00
STRATOGUARD LLC 176.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/30/2020 101-1550-4140 Vehicle Parts 43.29
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 43.29
Target 01/16/2020 101-1220-4290 CALENDAR 10.73
Target 01/16/2020 101-1600-4130 BREAD 37.55
Target 48.28
Tavern 4&5 01/16/2020 101-1120-4370 BREAKFAST MEET 51.00
Tavern 4&5 51.00
TBEI, Inc 01/23/2020 101-1320-4120 Spinner 110.63
TBEI, Inc 110.63
TEQUILA BUTCHER 01/16/2020 101-1120-4370 END OF YEAR BUDGET MEETING 63.00
TEQUILA BUTCHER 63.00
The Garden By The Woods 01/16/2020 720-7202-4300 FRONT PLANTERS 94.49
The Garden By The Woods 94.49
Under Armour 01/16/2020 101-1220-4240 SHIRTS 899.82
Under Armour 899.82
United Farmers Cooperative 01/30/2020 101-1550-4240 Heavy Duty Winter Gloves. 139.93
United Farmers Cooperative 139.93
University of Minnesota 01/16/2020 101-1310-4370 CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGEMENT RECERTIFICATION 120.00
University of Minnesota 120.00
US Bank Rebate 01/16/2020 101-1130-3903 US bank Rebate -1,396.44
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 9 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
US Bank Rebate -1,396.44
Wal-Mart 01/16/2020 700-0000-4150 Public Works Art 150.24
Wal-Mart 150.24
Water Environment Federation 01/16/2020 701-0000-4370 Training 40.00
Water Environment Federation 40.00
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 700-0000-4300 2019 Engineering Support Services 839.73
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4300 2019 Engineering Support Services 839.73
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 720-0000-4300 2019 Engineering Support Services 419.85
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 700-0000-4300 Interim Public Works Director 374.71
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4300 Interim Public Works Director 374.71
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 720-0000-4300 Interim Public Works Director 187.35
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 700-0000-4300 GIS Support Service 1,356.50
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4300 GIS Support Service 1,356.50
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 101-1310-4300 GIS Support Service 2,170.40
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 101-1310-4300 2019 Engineering Support Services 6,297.94
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 720-0000-4300 GIS Support Service 542.60
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 720-0000-4300 2019 GIS/AMS Support Services 786.17
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 700-0000-4300 2019 GIS/AMS Support Services 786.17
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4300 2019 GIS/AMS Support Services 786.16
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 101-1310-4300 Interim Public Works Director 2,810.33
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 720-0000-4300 LGU NYE Property Delineation Review 259.00
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 720-0000-4300 LGU HCRRA MN River Bluffs LRT Del 407.00
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 720-0000-4300 LGU - HCRRA MN River Bluffs LRT W 1,059.50
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/30/2020 720-0000-4300 Bluff Regulation Review 4,214.50
WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 25,868.85
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts 01/16/2020 101-1220-4370 HOTEL FOR CONFERENCE 926.60
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts 926.60
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Billing 36.05
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Billing 87.26
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Billing 80.34
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Billing 20.36
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Billing 11.32
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Billing 11.32
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Billing 18.66
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 101-1350-4320 Monthly Billing 196.41
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Billing 5,710.27
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 101-1600-4320 Monthly Billing 12.16
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 700-0000-4320 Monthly Billing 1,467.94
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/23/2020 700-7043-4320 Monthly Billing 5,703.09
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 700-7019-4320 East Water Treatment Plan 3,493.17
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1170-4320 City Utilities 1,586.25
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1190-4320 City Utilities 1,851.05
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1220-4320 City Utilities 1,136.63
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1370-4320 City Utilities 2,193.60
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1171-4320 City Utilities 19.39
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 700-0000-4320 City Utilities 274.20
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 10 of 11
Name Check D Account Description Amount
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4320 City Utilities 274.20
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1540-4320 Parks Dept 614.02
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1600-4320 Parks Dept 542.53
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1550-4320 Parks Dept 305.43
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1600-4320 Park Shelter 173.78
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 700-0000-4320 Lift Station -1,097.48
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 701-0000-4320 Lift Station 3,035.69
XCEL ENERGY INC 01/30/2020 101-1350-4320 City Lights 21,645.08
XCEL ENERGY INC 49,402.72
ZIEGLER INC 01/30/2020 101-1320-4140 Repair 1,613.92
ZIEGLER INC 1,613.92
204,323.12
Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/31/2020 - 3:42 PM)Page 11 of 11
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Monday, February 10, 2020
Subject 2020 Building Permit Activity January Year To Date
Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.4.
Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No:
ATTACHMENTS:
2020 Building Permit Activity
2020 Building
Permit Activity
January YTDCity of Chanhassen
7700 Market Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317
952-227-rr00
99Residential Single-Family
00Residential Townhomes
00Apartments/Senior Facilities
99Total Residential
00New
00Redeveloped
22Remodeled
22Total Commercial
170Single-Family Lots
42Residential Townhome Lots
t4tTotal Available Lots
40 9494855Single-Family
18 0560l2Townhomes
00026876Apartments/S enior Facilities
J576758109Commercial
t2115134431233Total Number of AII Permits
\\cfs5\cfs5\shared-data\admin\forms\building permit activity 2020 yd.doc
Residential Building Permits l't Quarter 2nd Quarter
3'd Quarter
YTD 4th Quarter Total YTD
Commercial Building Permits l't Quarter 2nd Quarter
3"d Quarter
YTD 4th Quarter
Total
YTD
Available Lot Inventory (end
of Ouarter)1't Quarter 2nd Quarter
3'd Quarter
YTD 4th Quarter
Total Permit History 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2020 2t5t2020BUILDING PERMIT DATA
2020 Itm IANI]ARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL JUNE Subtotals
Valuation Pmits Valultq
Section I Residential
SF DETACHED l0l 9 9 9
St] ATTACHED t02 0 0 0 $
2-FAMILY t0
3.4 FAMILY t04 0 0 0 $
5 OR MORE FAMILY 105
0 0
9 $ 4,037,000
Subtotal 109 9 9 9 M,037,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Section 2 Reidential. Non
HOTELS,/MOTELS 2t3 0 0 0 $
OTHER 214 0
0 0 $
Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Amusment 3r8 0 0 0 $
Churches 3t9 0
0 0 $Indusrial 320 $
Parkinq 321
0 0 0
Sflice Station/R@air
HosDihl/lnstitutional 323 0 0 0 $
324 0 0
Public works l2-{0 0
Schools 326 0 0 0 $
Sto16 327
0
328 0 0 0 $
Shuctur6 othd than bldg.129 I $157,000 I 0
0 157.000
Sublotal I srs7.000 $0 $o $0 $0 $o
Section 4 Additions
411 26 26 $53 l-400 26 26 0 $ 531.400
Nonr6idential 43'l 2 2 $10s,000 2 2 0
Caraq6
subtotal 28 28 $636.400 $o $0 $o $0 $0 28 23 0 $
Sstion 5 Dmolition
SF Amched 645 I I I
I I
0
2 Familv 641
3-4 fmily 641 0 0 0
5 or more familv
odler 649 0 0 0 $
Subtotal I I I $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $o I
TOTALS 39 38 t0 M.830.400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 39 33
Avtrage Valuations
Setion I Rdidiltial
SF DETACHED $448.ss6 #Dlv/0!#DMo!#DIV/01 #Dlv/o!#Dtv/o!
SF ATTACHED #DM0!#DM0l #Dlv/0!#DM0l #Drv/01 #DIV/O!
2.FAMILY #DM0!#DM0l #Dw/0!#Dtv/0!#Dtv/0!#DM0!
3-4 FAMILY #DM0!#DM0!#Dtv/0!#Drv/0!#DM0!#DIV/O!
5 OR MORE FAMILY #Drv/o!#Dtv/0!#DTV/O!#Dtv/01 #Drv/o!#Drv/o1
M48.556 #DM0!#Dlv/0!#DIV/O!#Drv/0!#Dw/0!
\\cfss\cfs5\Shared_Data\PLAN\CENSUS\RPT 201 I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I