Loading...
Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JANUARY 13, 2020 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Note:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Bluff Creek Partners Discussion of Potential Development 2.Key Financial Strategy: Study and Consider Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Initiatives 3.Review 2020 Key Financial Strategies List for Prioritization B.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS 1.Mayor's Address D.ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS 1.Designation of Official Newspaper, Appointment of Acting Mayor, Appointments to Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees, Appointment to the SouthWest Transit Commission, Appointment to the Economic Development Commission, and Appoint Youth Commissioner to Park & Recreation Commission E.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated December 9, 2019 2.Approval of a Three Lot/Four Outlot Subdivision with Variances at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway (Boylan Shores) 3.Resolution 2020­XX: Accept Public Trail and Utility Improvements in Arbor Glen Project No. 2017­05 4.Approve Consultant Agreement for 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05 AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, JANUARY 13, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSIONNote:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Bluff Creek Partners Discussion of Potential Development2.Key Financial Strategy: Study and Consider Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Initiatives3.Review 2020 Key Financial Strategies List for PrioritizationB.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Mayor's AddressD.ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS1.Designation of Official Newspaper, Appointment of Acting Mayor, Appointments toFire Relief Association Board of Trustees, Appointment to the SouthWest TransitCommission, Appointment to the Economic Development Commission, and AppointYouth Commissioner to Park & Recreation CommissionE.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated December 9, 20192.Approval of a Three Lot/Four Outlot Subdivision with Variances at 6760 MinnewashtaParkway (Boylan Shores)3.Resolution 2020­XX: Accept Public Trail and Utility Improvements in Arbor Glen Project No. 2017­05 4.Approve Consultant Agreement for 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05 5.Approve Consultant Agreement for Geotechnical Services for Project No. 20­05 6.Approve Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway Improvement Project 7.Award of Bid for Building Department Software Purchase 8.Award of Bid for LED Lighting Retrofit for City Hall, Library, and Public Works 9.Approval of Temporary On­Sale Liquor License, St. Hubert Catholic Community, Cana Dinner on February 15, 2020 F.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Visitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete and submit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda) G.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.Consider Approval of Slow No­Wake Ordinance for Lake Lucy, Lake Minnewashta, Lotus Lake, and Lake Susan H.NEW BUSINESS 1.Resolution 2020­XX: Award of Bids for Lyman Boulevard Improvement Project I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.2019 Building Permit Activity 2.Review of Claims Paid 01­13­2020 L.ADJOURNMENT M.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required to complete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available at https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior to the meeting. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue.  Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, JANUARY 13, 2020CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSIONNote:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Bluff Creek Partners Discussion of Potential Development2.Key Financial Strategy: Study and Consider Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Initiatives3.Review 2020 Key Financial Strategies List for PrioritizationB.7:00 P.M. ­ CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance)C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS1.Mayor's AddressD.ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS1.Designation of Official Newspaper, Appointment of Acting Mayor, Appointments toFire Relief Association Board of Trustees, Appointment to the SouthWest TransitCommission, Appointment to the Economic Development Commission, and AppointYouth Commissioner to Park & Recreation CommissionE.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated December 9, 20192.Approval of a Three Lot/Four Outlot Subdivision with Variances at 6760 MinnewashtaParkway (Boylan Shores)3.Resolution 2020­XX: Accept Public Trail and Utility Improvements in Arbor GlenProject No. 2017­054.Approve Consultant Agreement for 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­055.Approve Consultant Agreement for Geotechnical Services for Project No. 20­056.Approve Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria for Minnewashta ParkwayImprovement Project7.Award of Bid for Building Department Software Purchase8.Award of Bid for LED Lighting Retrofit for City Hall, Library, and Public Works9.Approval of Temporary On­Sale Liquor License, St. Hubert Catholic Community,Cana Dinner on February 15, 2020F.VISITOR PRESENTATIONSVisitor Presentations requesting a response or action from the City Council must complete andsubmit the Citizen Action Request Form (see VISITOR GUIDELINES at the end of this agenda)G.PUBLIC HEARINGS1.Consider Approval of Slow No­Wake Ordinance for Lake Lucy, Lake Minnewashta,Lotus Lake, and Lake SusanH.NEW BUSINESS1.Resolution 2020­XX: Award of Bids for Lyman Boulevard Improvement ProjectI.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSJ.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONSK.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION1.2019 Building Permit Activity2.Review of Claims Paid 01­13­2020L.ADJOURNMENTM.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONSWelcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen CityCouncil wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is providedat every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.Anyone seeking a response or action from the City Council following their presentation is required tocomplete and submit a Citizen Action Request Form. An online form is available athttps://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/action or paper forms are available in the city council chambers prior tothe meeting.Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor. Whencalled upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the CityCouncil as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the CityCouncil.If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokespersonthat can summarize the issue.  Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Tequila Butcher, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Bluff Creek Partners Discussion of Potential Development Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director File No:  SUMMARY On July 8, 2019, the city discussed the Creek Five properties (approximately 23 acres). At the Work Session, the City Council asked for a traffic study to be completed (attached).  Liv Horneland is interested in discussing development of the Bluff Creek Partners property (see attached map). The same issues that were addressed at the previous Work Session are still relevant to this request.   As a part of the Arboretum Boulevard Environmental Assessment (1995) and the Highway 5 Corridor Study (1995), the city made land use recommendations and design standards for the frontage roads and the Highway 5 Corridor.  The City Council unanimously adopted the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study including the following recommendations: Selection of access boulevards. Physical character of the access boulevards. Review the land use designated in the 1990 Comprehensive Guide Plan and make recommendations for change. Develop design standards for landscaping within the highway boulevard rights of way. Develop standards to govern private development within the corridor. There are a number of goals and policies that this plan recommendation includes: Access boulevard Land use Parks, Open space, and Trails Corridor Design and Streetscape The city has adopted, as a part of the city's zoning map, the Highway 5 Overlay District to apply the standards within the corridor. The subject property is guided Office Industrial and is currently zoned Agricultural Estate (A2).  The IOP (Industrial Office Park District) standards are attached. There are wetlands and drainage ways that need to be evaluated to determine the developable area of property. Ms. Horneland would like to see more retail on this site, approximately 27%.  In the past, the city applied a PUD zoning at the Arboretum Business Park (south of Highway 5 and east of Highway 41). This PUD permits CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectBluff Creek Partners Discussion of Potential DevelopmentSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, CommunityDevelopment Director File No: SUMMARYOn July 8, 2019, the city discussed the Creek Five properties (approximately 23 acres). At the Work Session, theCity Council asked for a traffic study to be completed (attached).  Liv Horneland is interested in discussingdevelopment of the Bluff Creek Partners property (see attached map). The same issues that were addressed at theprevious Work Session are still relevant to this request.  As a part of the Arboretum Boulevard Environmental Assessment (1995) and the Highway 5 Corridor Study (1995),the city made land use recommendations and design standards for the frontage roads and the Highway 5 Corridor. The City Council unanimously adopted the Highway 5 Corridor Land Use Design Study including the followingrecommendations:Selection of access boulevards.Physical character of the access boulevards.Review the land use designated in the 1990 Comprehensive Guide Plan and make recommendations forchange.Develop design standards for landscaping within the highway boulevard rights of way.Develop standards to govern private development within the corridor.There are a number of goals and policies that this plan recommendation includes:Access boulevardLand useParks, Open space, and TrailsCorridor Design and StreetscapeThe city has adopted, as a part of the city's zoning map, the Highway 5 Overlay District to apply the standards withinthe corridor.The subject property is guided Office Industrial and is currently zoned Agricultural Estate (A2).  The IOP (IndustrialOffice Park District) standards are attached.There are wetlands and drainage ways that need to be evaluated to determine the developable area of property. Ms. Horneland would like to see more retail on this site, approximately 27%.  In the past, the city applied a PUD zoning at the Arboretum Business Park (south of Highway 5 and east of Highway 41). This PUD permits approximately 10% retail (support commercial).  The Arboretum Business Park PUD 10% support commercial includes the hotel and daycare. Liv Horneland's request is significantly more than 10% retail. BACKGROUND In advance of the meeting on July 8, attached is a site plan proposed for ‘Bluff Creek Commons’ on the Creek Five Associates property.  Per earlier discussions, the right­in, right­out access was moved from the Bluff Creek Partners site to the Creek Five Associates site when Highway 5 was widened.  In addition, the previous driveway to the original homestead was closed off on the Creek Five Associates site.  After the expansion of Highway 5, a larger wetland has formed in the current access location in the NE corner of the Creek Five Associates site, causing this location to be less viable. We have discussed the right­in, right­out access with MnDOT and reviewed it with Ulteig Engineers, ROW specialists.  It appears MnDOT will follow the lead of the city as to location of the access.  Upon approval, MnDOT can move and modify the existing Quit Claim Deed which has been memorialized. Coordination will be needed regarding access design and construction.  The access meets the distance requirements from major intersections.  The current plan allows for the required 500’ of distance for the off and on lanes to and from the highway.   A preliminary grading plan is also attached which includes both the Creek Five Associates and Bluff Creek Partners properties.  The difficulty with both properties is topography and soils.  We have obtained preliminary cost estimates for site work and soil correction for the Creek Five Associates site containing approximately 22.86 acres. These costs total approximately $2.8M.  On the Bluff Creek Partners site, in order to construct an approximately 80,000 SF industrial building, it is necessary to lower the site by 10 feet which, thus far, has been cost prohibitive for this type of project. We are requesting the right­in, right­out access be moved a short distance to the west to create a viable project with opportunity for some higher uses along the frontage road to help offset high site costs.  We believe this will be a significant asset to the city in terms of taxes and property uses.  We look forward to further discussion and appreciate the kind consideration of Council members and staff. DISCUSSION While there may be more grading costs with the industrial zoning, the IOP District does allow for offices and hotels.  The retail use would certainly be more valuable real estate. Historically, staff has sought to limit the percentage of commercial by following the goals of the corridor study and directing commercial downtown or to commercially zoned property. ATTACHMENTS: Land Group Inc Cover Letter Bluff Creek Partners Property Traffic Study Highway 5 Corridor Study Bluff Creek Commons Grading Plan IOP Zoning Comprehensive Plan for Creek Five Associates Letter LAND GROUP, INC. BTUFF CREEK PARTNERS AND CREEK FIVE ASSOCIATES January 13,2020 City of Chanhassen 7700 Main St Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Stone Creek Drive 'Outlot A' is a lond parcel of approx. 7.83 acres. tt is zoned PUD as port of o lorger PUD of obout 3A ocres, which includes odjoining uses Fomily of Christ Church and Stone CreekTown Offices. Dear Mayor Ryan, Council Members and Staff, The most recent fresh perspective in development is Lifestyle Centers and our proposalfor Stone Creek Drive 'Outlot A'fits well within this mixed-use definition. Stone Creek Drive 'Outlot A' is the remaining vacant parcel of a larger 30 acre PUD. Varied existing uses are already in place including the Family of Christ Church and Stone Creek Town Offices, which encompass individually owned buildings offering office space and seryice retail space. The range of uses include chiropractors, electrical showrooms, insurance providers, accountants, dentists and more. The PUD zoning of Stone Creek Drive Outlot A' lists permitted uses which include office, warehouse, bank, medical, fitness center and daycare center. Road, sewer, water, fiber optics and regional ponding are already in place for this parcel within the larger PUD. Since we have had Stone Creek Drive 'Outlot A' as a vacant parcel for 20 years and none of these uses have chosen to locate thereon, our request at this time is for an amendment to the existing pUD to include apartments as one additional permitted use on the remaining undeveloped parcel, 'Outlot A'. Taking an overview of the larger area defined by Highway 5 to the north, Audubon Road on the east and Galpin Boulevard on the west, the uses are multiple and varied. Within this entire area there is only a single industrial user, General Mills. Adjacent to GM to the west is a vacant land parcel on Bluff Creek which GM has purchased, presumably for future expansion, but which is currently zoned for multi- housing. Directly south of Stone Creek Drive 'Outlot A' is an existing townhome development. Across Stone Creek Drive from the townhomes is a small office building. Thereafter are several single family homes buffered by a heavily wooded greenspace along Coulter Boutevard located across from the Bluff Creek Elementary and Recreation center. With the variety of uses in the immediate area, apartments would be a strategic addition in accommodating any dynamics of the Chanhassen citizenry looking for alternative housing, whether empty nesters down-sizing or young professionals moving into the area. The new luxury multi-family development proposed for Stone Creek Drive'Outlot A'will have several apartment sizes and options available in studio, one bedroom and two bedroom units. fu an additional benefit to the community, tax revenues for apartments are substantially higher than for industrial while impact on city services such as schools is small. Stone Creek Drive 'Outlot A' is attractively situated on a hill with Bluff Creek running below. The Creek and its green setting better serve apartments than a large industrial building. The footprint for an 80,000 SF industrial building, along with paved space for externaltruck loading areas and employee/visitor parking needs a wide flat site. ln order to accommodate the large footpr;nt, it is necessary to cut the hilltop down by 10" requiring significant soil removal and disposal. The footprint for an apartment building is much smaller at approximately a quarter of the size of an industrial project resulting in significantly less impact on the hill topography and Bluff Creek below with far less soil removal. The underground garage alternatively will utilize a depth of LL'6" under the smaller footprint of the building. The building height of industrial buildings in today's market require flexibility and runs from 36'to 50' in height. An apartment building of five stories is about 68' in height including about 6' of visible lower foundation. Construction is brick and wood with a more attractive exterior than industrial product. The opportunity for current and future residents in mixed-use Lifestyle Centers is to live, work, walk, eat and play within exciting and vibrant neighborhoodt each with its own character but functioning as part of the whole. Having worked o(ensively in Downtown Minneapolis for the past twenty years, the transformation of the North Loop has created multiple neighborhoods within blocks of each other. Today's residents want walkable neighborhoods within a larger community. The proposed Stone Creek Drive site is an easy mile and a half via walking trails to downtown Chanhassen. In a mixed use neighborhood, it is not necessary to get into the car to go to the coffee shop for it is right next door. The dentist and accountants and other retail service providers are there as well. We look forward to your joining our fresh vision for a beautiful and desirable apartment addition to the community and the neighborhood. Respectfully, Liv Horneland Land Group, lnc., for Bluff Creek Partners and Creek Five Associates 612-237-7s0s &la Site and Project Development NEC of Stone Creek Drive and Coulter Boulevard Chanhassen, MN PROPOSED APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT Developer - North American prooerties North American Properties is a national developer known locally for retail and condominiums at Southwest station and apartments at Tower Place on Singleree Lane in Eden prairie. The Stone Creek Drive 'outlot A' land parcel owned by Bluff Creek Partners is currently under contract with North American Properties, 46 North o'Connor Road, lrving Tx75o62. NAp proposes development of 250luxury apartment units on the stone Creek Drive site. Other informational and projectmaterials will bepresented at the work session by North American Properties. Their website is www.naproperties.com. Stone Creek Drive Outlot A' Zonine The Stone Creek Drive land parcel is owned by Bluff Creek Partners and is currently zoned planned Unit Development (PUD). lt is part of a larger 30 acre PUD which includes the Family of christ church and the Stone Creek Town Offices. The parcel itself is platted as Stone Creek Town Offices Outlot A, and contains approx. 7.83 acres of land. There are already a number of uses listed as acceptable within the pUD zoning for stone Creek Drive 'outlot A' including office, warehouse, bank, medical, fitness center and daycare center. we are requesting adding apartments as an alternate use by amendment to the puD. LanC Parcel Location and Description Stone Creek Drive 'outlot A' contains approx. 7.83 acres of vacant land located in the NEC of Stone Creek Drive and Coulter Boulevard. The larger area is defined by Highway 5 on the north, Audubon Road to the east and Galpin Boutevard to the west. As part of the original PUD of about 30 acres, the Family of Christ Church lies to the west of Outlot A., To the north are the stone Creek Town offices, which are individually owned townhouse-style offices occupied by various small companies and service retail business such as accountants, electrical lighting suppliers, chiropractors, and dental offices. continuing west are the Bluff Creek Elementary and Activity center. South across coulter Boulevard from the school is a heavily wooded greenspace at the back of several single family homes. East of the homes is a small office building in the swc of coulter and stone creek Drive. Directly south of 'Outlot A'across Coulter on Bluff Creek is an existing townhome development. Across Bluff Creek to the east is a vacant land parcel also zoned multi-family but which is owned by General MillS presumably for future expansion. General Mills is the lone industrial use in this quadrant. Greenspace and UtiliW Services Bluff Creek runs along the east border of the vacant land site. The site has topography which raises it above the creek with an attrilctave overview of the creek and surrounding area. This is a walkable area with a trail system located along Bluff Creek from the south and extending along Stone Creek Drive through a tunnel under Highway 5 and from there 1 % miles to downtown Chanhassen. Road, sewer and water are in place in Stone Creek Drive. Fiber optics are located in Coulter Bfud. Regional ponding for the land parcel is shared with the Church and Stone Creek Town Offices and is already in place as part of the original PUD. Regional ponding has been provided for Stone Creek Drive 'Outlot A' as part of the larger 3O acre PUD which includes shared ponding for the Family of Christ Church and the Stone Creek Town Offices. Site Develooment The Stone Creek Drive site on a hill with Bluff Creek below is attradive. lts challenges, however, include significant topography and various clay soils for construction. As discussed, 'Outlot A' has been under contract for industrial development several times. However, in order to place a large industrial building of 8O000 SF plus loading docks and emptoyee/visitor par{<ing onsite, it is necessary to cut the hill down by about 10 feet, which requires significant soil removal and disposal. An apartment building requires a much smaller footprint about a quarter of the size of an indusrial project with less disturbance to the hill and Bluff Creek below. The apartment building will be five stories above the underground garage and will have a height of about 62 'including roof parapet, plus 6' feet of visible foundation, for a total of 58' and will be built with brick and wood construction. Significantly, the height of the underground parking garage is 11'5", thus utilizing the building footprint but without needing to lower the site with excessive excavation as would an industrial project. MU LTI.FAM tLY SU B.MARKET REPORT (SYNOPSIS OF CONCTUSIONS) CARVER COUNTY Excerpts included betow are conclusions frun eoch category os noted in the report prepored by costar.The entirety of the 120 poge report includes the new venue in downtown and is ovailotble electronicoily. Overview A lack of construction for much of this expansion, combined with annuat absorption reaching a cycle-high in 2018, has kept the vacancy rate closer to the submarket's alt-time low than the peak. c-arvercounty offers short commutes to the 1494 corridor and the city of Shakopee, where Arnazon is a majoremployer. That' along with a local economy underpinned by stable employment in the education and healthservices sector, keeps the occupancy rate high and continues to push both asking rent and effective renthigher' while rent growth is expected to moderate from the 495'ptus gains seen over the past couple ofyears' it should remain healthy for the remainder of 2019. New supply is more of a rarity in thissubmarket and it had been a decade since the last delivery before an glunit project delivered in early-2018' Given the success of deliveries in comparable second-ring suburbs, this submarket is likely on theradar of more developers as evidenced by the two additional pro;ects containing 250 units scheduled todeliver by the end of 2019' Despite cap rates hovering aroundthe market wide average, investmentactivity has been muted into the second half of 2019, following the large deals which propelled 201g toan all-time high in terms of investment volume. Vacancv carver county a demographically solid submarket with high-income resident, strong householdformation, and a large proportion of college-educated residents. For multifamily devetopers and owners,one of the largest headwinds is that most residents can afford to own a home, and about four in fivechoose to do so' Residents move here because the cost of living is reasonable, the quality of schools isgood' and commutes to major employment centers are manageable, if a bit longer than from morecentrally located submarkets. The strong local economy, which is anchored by the manufacturing and education and health servicessectors' contributes to solid occupancy- The submarket's manufaJuring hub runs along the HazeltineBoulevard corridor and supports over 9,@0 high-paying jobs with weekly wages that average overs1'300' That makes it the second highest paying sector in the submarket, just below professional andbusiness services. steady job growth in lower paying sectors such as leisure and hospitality has contributed to strongvacancy compression in 1 & 2 star properties, which account fior about one-third of this submarket,sinventory although across the board this is a tight submarket, as evidenced by the headline vacancyrate remaining below the submarket's historical average. Rents Renting can still be a good deal in carver county, with asking rents that are a little more than the metroaverage and a little less than the cost of a typicat mortgage with a 3o-year term,4yointerest, and including taxes and insurance, though true bargains are harder to come by if you are looking for something above the 1 & 2 Star category. Rent growth has been on the upswing reaching all-time highs in 2017 that made this one of the best performing submarkets in the metro. While rent growth looks to moderate from the 47o-plus gains seen over the last couple of years, the eight-year string of positive gains should continue for the rernainder of 2019. Strong demand in the 4 & 5 Star segment has been powering Carver County's recent rent growth, although the low overall vacancy rate has translated into solid growth which has spread to all star ratings. The most expensive properties, with rents above S1.50/SF, are in the eastern half of the submarket, clustered in Chaska, Hazeltine, and Chanhassen. Properties in those areas are right in the middle of the submarket's manufucturing hub. But residents also have easy access to employment centers such as the 1494 corridor, which has the densest concentration of corporate campuses in the metro, and the city of Shakopee, where Amazon plans to increase its workforce to 2,500 employees. Market Given the general strength of the southwestern suburbs, whlch benefit from some of the tightest conditions and strongest rent growth in the metro, investors might be eager to gain exposure to this submarket. But limited institutional stock means deals are few and far between, and average asking rents have acted as a barrier to entry on the development side, though rent growth has been on a tear more recently which could spur more investment activity, despite cap rates which have been trending lower through this cycle. f Property lnformation 258180270 LOT' ci'trERilir,rE *Htr"tr* PO BOX 16 H taEL fNc1',I IEH AUURL5\ 6634G Tax Districts :: :. -: 0112 Bluff Creek Partners Property crn CI-IANHASSEN ztP STONE CREEKTOVVN oFFtc€s .I.IATERSHED OISTRICT:WS 06,I RITEY PIJRG ELUFF CREEK Draft Memorandum www.srfconsulting.com 1 Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 | Minneapolis, MN 55447-4453 | 763.475.0010 Fax: 1.866.440.6364 An Equal Opportunity Employer SRF No. 01913026 To: Liv Horneland Creek Five Associates From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Principal Tom Sachi, PE, Associate Date: September 18, 2019 Subject: Bluff Creek Commons Trip Generation and Access Review Introduction SRF has completed a trip generation and access review for the potential Bluff Creek Commons/Stone Creek developments located near the Mn Highway 5 and Audubon Road intersection in Chanhassen, MN (see Figure 1: Existing Conditions). The main objectives of this review are to compare the trip generation potential of the current zoning to potential development scenarios and review access alternatives to Mn Highway 5. This study review does not include a detailed intersection capacity analysis. The following sections provide an overview of the review findings. Development Scenarios The Bluff Creek Commons/Stone Creek developments are generally bounded by Mn Highway 5 to the north, Coulter Boulevard to the south, Stone Creek Drive to the west, and an adjacent parcel to the east. The sites are currently vacant but zoned for “Office Industrial” land use. Based on City ordinance and the future land use plan, the sites could be developed as industrial, office, or a combination of the two land use types. For purposes of this review, the following two scenarios represent the potential development within the sites, assuming a 25 percent floor-area-ration (FAR) for the approximate 31-acre review area (which includes both the Bluff Creek Commons and Stone Creek development areas):  Scenario 1: 340,000 square feet of industrial  Scenario 2: 340,000 square feet of office In addition to these scenarios, two additional hybrid scenarios were reviewed, which include a combination of office, retail, residential, and industrial land use types. The primary difference is that one of the additional hybrid scenarios (referred to as Scenario 3) includes a hotel land use while Scenario 4 has more of restaurant focus. The Stone Creek development would have access along Stone Creek Drive, while the Bluff Creek Commons development would have access to Coulter Boulevard and Mn Highway 5, both approximately 1/4-mile west of Audubon Road. The Mn Highway 5 access configuration is discussed later in this document. Additionally, an access to McGlynn Road is expected to be made available via an expected extension of McGlynn Road to the proposed development. NORTHNorth01913026 August 2019 Project Location Figure 1H:\Projects\13000\13206\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig01_Project Location.cdrBluff Creek Commons Trip Generation and Access Review Gramercy Commercial Group, LLC 5 Coulter Boulevard Audubon RoadBluff Creek Commons Stone Creek ROAD17 COUNTYROAD 117 COUNTY ROAD19 COUNTY 5 Bluff Creek Commons Trip Generation and Access Review August 28, 2019 Page 3 Trip Generation To understand the trip generation potential of the current land use zoning, as well as the potential hybrid land use scenarios, a trip generation analysis was completed. A summary of the trip generation estimates for each of the land use scenarios identified is illustrated in Table 1. The trip generation estimates were developed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition, which accounts for the land use type and size. For the hybrid scenarios, the estimates include a 20 percent multi-use reduction, which is consistent with methodology in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook for the expected land uses. Based on the findings of the trip generation review, the two hybrid scenarios (i.e. Scenarios 3 and 4) are expected to generate between 2.5 and 3 times more daily trips as compared to the current zoning guidance as illustrated in Scenario 1. This is the result of the proposed retail/commercial components associated with Scenarios 3 and 4. Note that Scenario 4 would generate the most daily trips, with nearly 5,200 vehicles per day (vpd) generated, as compared to approximately 1,700 vpd under Scenario 1. Access Review Project team discussion indicates a desire to have right-in/right-out access to Mn Highway 5, which would be located approximately 1/4-mile west of Audubon Road. In addition, a three-quarter access at this same location was reviewed to understand potential traffic benefits and impacts and ultimately the feasibility of this type of access. A full-access to Mn Highway 5 was considered but not reviewed in detail given the potential safety concerns and limited benefit/users. To evaluate the right-in/right-out and three-quarter access scenarios, site generated trips were distributed to the study access locations and adjacent roadway network based on the directional distribution shown in Figure 2. This distribution was developed based on existing area travel patterns and engineering judgment. A summary of the site generated trips under Scenario 4 (hybrid-restaurant) for the right-in/right-out and three-quarter access scenarios are illustrated in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively, which represents the highest volume condition reviewed. Findings Based on a review of the traffic volumes under the two access scenarios, both options appear feasible. The right-in/right-out access to Mn Highway 5 provides a lower conflict access. An eastbound right- turn lane into the site would be recommended, while an eastbound acceleration lane is not expected to be necessary for motorists leaving the site to travel eastbound on Mn Highway 5. The three-quarter access scenario also provides a lower conflict access, although the westbound left- turn movement during the a.m. peak hour may be more challenging given the number of vehicles eastbound along Mn Highway 5 during the morning. Providing a three-quarter access would benefit operations at the adjacent Mn Highway 5/Audubon Road intersection by limiting new westbound left-turning vehicles from the proposed development. Further discussion with area stakeholders, including the Minnesota Department of Transportation, should occur regarding potential access. A detailed intersection capacity analysis may be necessary to help determine the preferred access design. Bluff Creek Commons Trip Generation and Access Review August 28, 2019 Page 4 Table 1. Trip Generation Estimates Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Trips In Out In Out Scenario 1 (Industrial Focus) General Light Industrial (110) 340,000 SF 209 29 28 186 1,686 Scenario 2 (Office Focus) General Office Building (710) 340,000 SF 104 21 27 109 1,115 Scenario 3 (Hybrid - Hotel) General Light Industrial (110) 160,200 SF 99 13 13 88 795 Hotel (310) 100 Rooms 28 19 31 29 836 General Office Building (710) 7,200 SF 7 1 1 7 70 Shopping Center (820) 18,000 SF 10 6 33 36 680 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru (937) 2,450 SF 111 107 53 53 2,010 Mid-Rise Multifamily (221) 200 DU 19 53 54 34 1,088 Subtotal Trips 274 199 185 247 5,479 Multi-Use Reduction (20%) (-55) (-40) (-37) (-50) (-1,096) Scenario 3 Trips 219 159 148 197 4,383 Scenario 4 (Hybrid - Restaurant) General Light Industrial (110) 160,200 SF 99 13 13 88 795 General Office Building (720) 7,200 SF 16 4 7 18 251 Shopping Center (820) 18,000 SF 10 6 33 36 680 High-Turnover Restaurant (932) 15,000 SF 82 67 91 56 1,683 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru (937) 2,450 SF 111 107 53 53 2,010 Mid-Rise Multifamily (221) 200 DU 19 53 54 34 1,088 Subtotal Trips 337 250 251 285 6,507 Multi-Use Reduction (20%) (-68) (-50) (-50) (-57) (-1,302) Scenario 4 Trips 269 200 201 228 5,205 NORTHNorth01913026 August 2019 Directional Distribution Figure 2H:\Projects\13000\13206\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig02_Directional Distribution.cdrBluff Creek Commons Trip Generation and Access Review Gramercy Commercial Group, LLC 5 Coulter Boulevard Audubon RoadBluff Creek Commons Stone Creek ROAD117 COUNTY ROAD19 COUNTY 5 20%10%50%15%5% NORTHNorth01913026 August 2019 Site Generated Trips - Right-In/Right-Out Access Figure 3H:\Projects\13000\13206\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig03_Site Generated Trips_RIRO.cdrBluff Creek Commons Trip Generation and Access Review Gramercy Commercial Group, LLC (20) 16(15) 23Audubon RoadMn Highway 5 (104) 83 137 (107) 5 Coulter Boulevard Audubon Road (104) 83Bluff Creek AccessMn Highway 5 (43) 65 16 (20) XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Site Trips - P.M. Peak Hour Site Trips - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control LEGEND (26) 21(51) 42Bluff Creek AccessCoulter Boulevard (17) 25 (18) 27 23 (15) 10 (28)Stone Creek DriveCoulter Boulevard (6) 2 (17) 25 10 (28) 42 (51) (18) 6(4) 27 Future Roadway Connection is Expected Bluff Creek InternalMcGlynn Road (25) 21 144 (92) McGlynn Road NORTHNorth01913026 August 2019 Site Generated Trips (Three-Quarter Access)Figure 4H:\Projects\13000\13206\TraffStudy\Figures\Fig04_Three Quarter Access.cdrBluff Creek Commons Trip Generation and Access Review Gramercy Commercial Group, LLC (20) 16(14) 21Audubon RoadMn Highway 5 (104) 83 100 (66) 23 (29) 5 Coulter Boulevard Audubon Road (104) 83Bluff Creek AccessMn Highway 5 (38) 57 16 (20) 100 (66) XX (XX) - A.M. Peak Hour Site Trips - P.M. Peak Hour Site Trips - Side-Street Stop Control - Signalized Control LEGEND (26) 21(51) 42Bluff Creek AccessCoulter Boulevard (33) 53 (18) 27 23 (15) 10 (28)Stone Creek DriveCoulter Boulevard (6) 2 (33) 53 10 (28) 42 (51) (18) 6(4) 27 Future Roadway Connection is Expected Bluff Creek InternalMcGlynn Road (25) 21 24 (15) McGlynn Road CITY CF CHANHASSEN 690 C{-,1ULIER DRIVE CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 HIGI{WAY 5 CORRIDOR LAND USE AND URBAN DESIGN PLAN _l August 1995 Preprred for the City of Chrnhassen by Barton-Aschmrn Associates' Inc. in association with Camiros l i I by the wetland that occupies neady halfthe site. Pennitting commercial use ber6 oould lead to pressure for crccping corungcialization clssrvhcre in rhe corridor. Ofic€r'hdustriaL Insppropriate. Site is sevsely cotrstratue4 and plcnty ofland for &rsc uscs is s€t aside at olhtr locatioDs. Mix of resideatial uscg as sbowa in lbe 1990 Conprehcnsive Plan, wi& thc option of mcdiurn dersity or low deosity on a portion oflhc westsly half of thc Gorra pmperty. Rccomrneadation: Mcclyon Propsty, Southwest View Propcrty lyiag rcugbly north of Mcclpn's 8trd Timberwood, bctwe€n Audubon Road on tbe east ard Galpin Boulel'ard on lhc wes. OlEcclndustshl cosr of BluIfcr€ck SiDgle-Family Rcsideida baweea the crcek branches and to Oe w€sL :-F*<" BAFTCTN-ASC}IvIAN,ASSE CIATEST lNC.c4 r _ __*e a -, J, South Sid! ofTE 5 Parccl Descriptioa: 1990 Desipation: E:risting Uscs: Potrotial Uscs: Vrcant WesrerD Portion ofsirc reccarly purcbased by the school dislrict as 8n clcnrcarary sc,hool site. r Sb8l€-Family Rcsidential: May be appropriarc for lhe pscels mappcd this way in lhe 1990 plaD' but may not bc lhc mo$ desirablc usc. Souih access boulevsd will provitle a logical br€at betwecD land uses, with higber intc,lsitics adjaccnt ro llighway 5 and l,ow intositics south oflhc boulevar4 panicularly adjaceot to (east o0 Timberwood. r Mutt'rfarnily Residotiat: May be appmpriare, but rnay not be lhe most dcsirablc usc. Adjaccacy to the proposcd school t-+tr.l&oIJr!,){*\sE<)8irYjtri.'l J-tIt]\Itil-L l; \4 t-/\ It I I I t ',.1'-r-. r-. Ir' F4 !ri\€\. '-t i F rrl o4 E EO EEsi zt E? =,E}<To11-CL-_t E!t! 3 a! I TI 3q Et! E I 9 aI 3 a I 'i 3? .l t 0 I ( .i @.fql&,IitrA.,IeUt\aNo{saaFqILtjEv i E I iEIt .,,,1'' , dEIF t: t! ;;q E I \n-t'\ - E l'L) a E E .-f lf I E ta,l-I, B \./ F l><i!)a a ztiEz2, !=8;S(JDiize ir<-t{ E< ! 0 {0 3 t1 t '9. I c I l?,? e E3 ,!E,t t nUL{,1 ( i lJl 5 E E ,l I t I o I r.l EEiE lt il i) I ilI I :t iI l I !ir : f ) i I HIGHWAY 5 COULTER BOULEVARD 17 T R E E S26'35'70'DRIVE THRU 12'12'4 STORY HOTEL G 15,000 S.F. FOOTPRINT 100 ROOMS 26'90'DRIVE THRU 2,450 D 80'10'273' 10'18'OFFICE E 7,200 S.F.100'180' OFFICE/SHOWROOM H 18,000 S.F.10'100'366' OFFICE/SHOWROOM J 36,600 S.F.240'440' OFFICE WAREHOUSE K 105,600 S.F.26'RETAIL B 8,000 S.F.36'26'26'813 11.73' 6' 18'26'36'26'18' 15 15 9 9 15 13 13 26' 18' 16 7 10 11 12 11 11 1212 29 35 39 7 1515 26' 18'18' 3636 22 24 22 36 21 CARS 20.56'18'18'160'40'65 STALLS 56 STALLS 144 STALLS 44 STALLS 54 STALLS 176 STALLS 123'65'26'12'RETAIL A 10,000 S.F. 75 STALLS 154'65'5 5 18'6 6 5 5 6 6 8 4 5 6 12 11 BUILDING SITE AREA ACRES BLDG. PARK RATIO A RETAIL 95,859 SF 2.20 10,000 SF 75 7.5 B RETAIL 70,780 SF 1.62 8,000 SF 65 8.1 D DRIVE-THRU REST.41,205 SF 0.95 2,450 SF 21 8.6 E OFFICE/RETAIL 66,563 SF 1.53 7,200 SF 56 7.8 G HOTEL 129,502 SF 2.97 60,000 SF 144 2.4 H OFFICE/SHOWRM 76,877 SF 1.76 18,000 SF 44 2.4 J OFFICE/SHOWRM 106,784 SF 2.45 36,600 SF 54 1.5 K OFFICE/WAREHOUSE 424,434 SF 9.74 105,600 SF 176 1.7 TOTAL 1,012,004 SF 23.23 247,850 SF 635 2.6 BLUFF CREEK COMMONS BLUFF CREEK COMMONS SITE PLAN CHANHASSEN, MN Key Plan Mark Revision / Issue Date Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2019 901 North Third Street, Suite 220 612-436-4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612-692-9960 A1-B ARTICLE XXII. - "IOP" INDUSTRIAL OFFICE PARK DISTRICT Sec. 20-811. - Intent. The intent of the "IOP" District is to provide an area identified for large-scale light industrial and commercial planned development. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-1), 12-15-86) Sec. 20-812. - Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in an "IOP" District: (1) Adult day care, subject to the requirements of section 20-966. (2) Antennas as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (3) Automotive repair shops. (4) Brewery operated in conjunction with a taproom producing less than 3,500 barrels per year, subject to the requirements of section 20-969. (5) Conference/convention centers. (6) Health services. (7) Indoor health and recreation clubs. (8) Light industrial. (9) Microdistillery operated in conjunction with a cocktail room, subject to the requirements of section 20-967. (10) Offices. (11) Off-premises parking lots. (12) Print shops. (13) Recording studios. (14) Utility services. (15) Vocational school. (16) Warehouses. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-2), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 240, § 21, 7-25-95; Ord. No. 259, § 27, 11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, § 109, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 628, § 40, 12-11-17; Ord. No. 632, § 14, 6-11- 18) Sec. 20-813. - Permitted accessory uses. The following are permitted accessory uses in an "IOP" District: (1) Automotive repair shop. (2) Day care center. (3) Parking lots and ramps. (4) Signs. (5) Temporary outdoor sales and events (subject to the requirements of sections 20-964). Retail sales of products stored or manufactured on the site provided no more than 20 percent of the floor space is used for retail sales. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-3), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 93, § 1, 7-25-88; Ord. No. 377, § 110, 5- 24-04; Ord. No. 619, § 14, 2-27-17) Sec. 20-814. - Conditional uses. The following are conditional uses in an "IOP" District: (1) Brewery operated in conjunction with a taproom, producing over 3,500 barrels per year. (2) Contracting yards. (3) Day care centers as part of a multi-tenant building. (4) Day care centers as a separate facility. (5) Food processing. (6) Gun range, indoor. (7) Home improvement trades. (8) Hotels and motels. (9) Lumber yards. (10) Motor freight terminals. (11) Outdoor health and recreation clubs. (12) Screened outdoor storage. (13) Research laboratories. (14) Commercial towers as regulated by article XXX of this chapter. (15) Electrical distribution and underground electric distribution substations. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-4), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 97, § 1, 10-24-88; Ord. No. 120, § 4(12), 2-12-90; Ord. No. 259, § 28, 11-12-96; Ord. No. 377, § 111, 5-24-04; Ord. No. 390, § 5, 3-14- 05; Ord. No. 527, § 4, 8-22-11; Ord. No. 632, § 15, 6-11-18) State Law reference— Conditional uses, M.S. § 462.3595. Sec. 20-815. - Lot requirements and setbacks. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an "IOP" district subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this chapter: (1) The minimum lot area is one acre. (2) The minimum lot frontage is 150 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall have a minimum frontage of 60 feet. (3) The minimum lot depth is 200 feet. (4) The maximum lot coverage is 70 percent. (5) Off-street parking shall comply with district setback requirements except: a. There is no minimum setback when it abuts a railroad right-of-way, except as provided in chapter 20, article XXV, division 3, pertaining to landscaping requirements. b. There is no minimum setback when it abuts, without being separated by a street, another off-street parking area. c. The minimum setback is 50 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. d. The minimum setback is 25 feet for side street side yards. e. Parking setbacks along public rights-of-way may be reduced to a minimum of ten feet if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city that 100 percent screening is provided at least five feet above the adjacent parking lot. The intent of this section is that the city is willing to trade a reduced setback for additional landscaping that is both an effective screen and of high quality aesthetically. Acceptable screening is to be comprised of berming and landscaping. Screening through the use of fencing is not permitted. (6) The maximum height is as follows: a. For the principal structure, four stories/50 feet. b. For accessory structures, one story. (7) Minimum setback requirements: a. For front yards, 30 feet. b. For rear yards, ten feet. c. For side yards, ten feet. d. The minimum setback is 100 feet when it abuts a residential district without being separated from the residential district by a street or railroad right-of-way. In instances where existing topography and/or vegetation provide buffering satisfactory to the city, or where quality site planning is achieved, the city may reduce setback requirements by up to 50 percent. The applicant shall have the full burden of demonstrating that there is sufficient separation and screening for the higher intensity use. e. Buffer yards. 1. The city comprehensive plan establishes a requirement for buffer yards. Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses and shall comply with chapter 20, article XXV, of the Chanhassen City Code. 2. The buffer yard is not an additional setback requirement. The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use. 3. The buffer yard is intended to provide physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use. As such, they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming, landscaping and/or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential. To the extent deemed feasible by the city, new plantings shall be designed to require the minimum of maintenance, however, such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan, shall be the obligation of the property owner. (Ord. No. 80, Art. V, § 16(5-16-5), 12-15-86; Ord. No. 94, §§ 1, 7, 7-25-88; Ord. No. 136, §§ 1A, 1B, 1-28-91; Ord. No. 451, § 8, 5-29-07; Ord. No. 474, §§ 14, 15, 10-13-08) Sec. 20-816. - Interim uses. The following are interim uses in the "IOP" District: (1) Churches. (2) Concrete mixing plants. (Ord. No. 120, § 3, 2-12-90) Secs. 20-817—20-900. - Reserved. LAND GROUP, INC. P.O. BOX 16 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55340 December 14, 2018 Kate Aanenson Dir€ctor of Ptsnning 7700 Market Bhd ChantEssen, MN 553'17 Dear Kate: Re: Comprehensive Phn br Creek Five As3oci6s, PID 25.0'150300. P6r €arlier dis.rr8sbn, ws havs b€en addressing sorn€ of the dilficul0es of development of the Creek Five site. lt has b€come incrEssimly appaEnt the p.op€rty in ils enurety does not tirork *€ll fur large froolpm indusfial d6,6loPment throughout due b G vaiyilB bpography. The Cr€ek Five parcel contains approx. 22.86 acres in btsl, of which he b€ck poflion is moderaEly level b rolling. We a,6 propoeing a concspt pbn whi$ will r€bin br indusfial use the more moder&ly le\,e| back area of apEox. '14 aqes bord€tBd by Coulter Blvd. The bahnce of th€ siE exbnding b Hury 5 has more sEntficam bpogrephy. Thb paltal has highway frontage and contairc appmx I tctls. Cun€nty thera B a dGcded dght'in, right{ut access onu Hwy 5. Ih6 us63 propoG€d br hb parcel ar€ r€8i[l!d o1&€, indudi]U medical office, ,estauranb, coft€ shop and pos{tiuy hoEl. Dirccdy wast of his sit3 are locabd tlE $ne Crek Town Offic€s whirr indudo numemus small busin;ses benefiting tom hilh*8y frontagp viriuliti with a number falling inb a d€slinatirt r€tail categpry. There are, of co{tBe, o0te row ntail btrsin€ssca alo.tg Hury 5 a3 scll. We look funmtd b dieo,6l*ng thb pn{oci turlher. RBpccftlty,/) /// _ I you6, Liv Homeland President CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Key Financial Strategy: Study and Consider Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Initiatives Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.2. Prepared By Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer File No: 2019­06 DISCUSSION City staff along with SEH, Inc. will present to City Council the findings of the most recent Infiltration and Inflow (I/I) study.  The objective of the study was to perform an investigation of the existing sanitary sewer collection system, quantify and identify critical I/I sub­sewer sheds, and explore the need for establishing a private property program while providing recommendations for implementing a long­term plan to remove I/I from the city sanitary sewer system. ATTACHMENTS: I/I Study Findings and Recommendations Draft Report Inflow and Infiltration Study Private Property Evaluation City Project 2019-06 Completed in partnership with Project Objectives •Monitor flows within the sanitary sewer collection system •Verify the need for addressing clear water (Inflow and Infiltration, I/I) contribution from private sources into the sanitary sewer system •Develop potential options for implementing a long term plan to remove I/I from the City’s sanitary collection system The Inflow and Infiltration Problem What is Inflow and Infiltration (I/I)? •Clear Water (groundwater or stormwater) entering into the sanitary sewer collection system •Typical Sources: •Leaking Pipes •Sump Pumps •Storm Sewer Cross- Connections The Inflow and Infiltration Problem •Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES) surcharge program •City currently invests approximately $250k per year as part of the MCES program •City received 2 notices from MCES in 2019 Monitoring Sewer Flows Flow Monitoring Process •10 Area/Velocity Flow Sensors installed throughout the City’s collection system •Focus on “sewersheds” that contribute directly into the MCES system •Monitoring period from May 7, 2019 to October 10, 2019 Initial Flow Metering Districts Initial Flow Data Analysis •Four (4) notable wet weather events: May 27th, July 1st, July 15th, and August 17th •Determine Peak Flow Rate by subtracting base flow from Wet Weather Response •Sewershed Districts 5 and 5A identified as having the highest peak flow rates I/I Contribution based on May 27, 2019 rain event Follow-up Flow Monitoring •Flow meters relocated to further break up Districts 5 and 5A based on the initial response. •Broke up District 5 and 5A into eight (8) sub-districts. Provides detailed analysis of individual neighborhood clusters (micro-metering) •Utilized property “Age of Construction” data to further analyze areas for potential likelihood of sump pumps and foundation drains August 26, 2019 relocated meter locations (Sept. 12 Rain Event Results) Private Infrastructure Focus Private vs. Public •Approximately 60% of the sanitary sewer collection system within the City is privately owned (residential or commercial) •The City has been rehabilitating public infrastructure over the past two decades but the system still exhibits peak I/I flows above MCES allowable levels •Flow data from this study exhibits conditions that are typically associated with I/I contribution from private infrastructure such as sump pumps and/or foundation drains •Immediate response to active rainfall •Typically last only as long as the rainfall •Common Sources: •Storm Sewer Cross- Connections •Leaking Manholes “Typical” Public I/I Rain Event Typical Daily Flows Wet Weather Flows (WWF) Dry Weather Flows (7 day WWF offset) •Drawn out I/I response. Can last upwards of 7 days after the rain event •Saturated soils typically increase I/I intensity •Common Sources: •Sump Pumps •Foundation Drains •Leaking Pipes “Typical” Private I/I Rain Event Extended Elevated Flow Levels Wet Weather Flows (WWF) Dry Weather Flows (7 day WWF offset) Private I/I Response Public I/I Response Next Steps for Mitigating I/I Potential Action Items (Public and Private) •Develop and implement a public I/I education program (Private) •Update the sewer ordinance (Private) •Expand the manhole inspection program. (Public) •Conduct a smoke testing investigation in Sewer District 5-3. (Public) •Implement a PPI program (Private) •Prioritize Sewer Districts 5-2, 5-4, 5A-2 and 5A-3 •Continue CCTV and sewer lining projects (Public) •Prioritize Sewer Districts 5, 5A, 7 and 7A •Develop and implement a public I/I education program (Private) •Update the sewer ordinance (Private) •Expand the manhole inspection program. (Public) •Conduct a smoke testing investigation in Sewer District 5-3. (Public) •Implement a PPI program (Private) •Prioritize Sewer Districts 5-2, 5-4, 5A-2 and 5A-3 •Continue CCTV and sewer lining projects (Public) •Prioritize Sewer Districts 5, 5A, 7 and 7A I/I Program Recommendations Update Sewer Ordinance Develop and Implement Public Education Program Implement a Private Property Inspection (PPI) Program •Sump Pump / Building Inspections •In-Home Service Lateral CCTV Inspections •Mainline Launch CCTV Inspections Prioritize Sewer Districts 5, 5A, 7, and 7A for future remediation efforts (public and private) Private Property Inspection Programs •Sump Pump / Building Inspection Program •City of Eagan and Forest Lake –achieved reduction to below MCES rates. •City of Minnetonka –successfully reduced peak hour discharges 15-20% •In-Home Building and Service Lateral CCTV Inspection Program •Golden Valley –Mandatory Point-of-Sale Inspection, 6000 insp. over 11 yrs. •Columbia Heights –Voluntary inspection, City funded, < 30% inspection rate •Mainline Launch CCTV Inspection Program •Saint Paul –Able to successfully inspect > 90% of private laterals •Cannot identify Sump Pump or Foundation Drain connections Potential Program Cost •Update Sewer Ordinance $10,000 •Public Education Program $3,000 •Private Property Inspections $273,000 •Assuming Mandatory Inspection of approximately 900 homes •Public CCTV/Sewer Lining $80,000 Program Total:$366,000 PPI Program Outcomes •Disconnection of Illicit Sump Pumps •Most cost effective method for reducing I/I, <$1,000 per property •Requires follow-up inspection to ensure enforcement •Disconnection of Illicit Foundation Drains •Intrusive to the Homeowner, Requires open cut excavation •Repair costs < $3,000 per property •Necessary Repairs of “Defective” Private Laterals •City funded, Subsidized Costs, or full Home Owner responsibility •Depending on scope, Lateral repairs = $10,000 per property Thank You Inflow and Infiltration Study Private Property Evaluation City of Chanhassen, Minnesota City Project 2019-06 SEH Project No. CHANH 150965 Prepared for: Prepared by: Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-3507 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax December 16, 2019 RE: Inflow and Infiltration Investigation Private Property Evaluation City of Chanhassen, Minnesota SEH No. CHANH 150965 4.00 Mr. Erik R. Hendricksen, EIT Project Engineer 7700 Market Blvd. PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Erik: The following draft technical report presents our findings and recommendations from our Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) investigation and private property evaluation on the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system. The report reviews the work completed under our current investigation including a background review of the City of Chanhassen’s past I/I investigations and findings, our current flow monitoring program results, a review of potential measures and our recommendations for future I/I investigations for both the private and public Chanhassen infrastructure. Please have your staff review the document and provide comments back to us. If you would like to meet and discuss any aspect of the report or what we can expect at the Council workshop, let us know and we can setup a preliminary meeting. Look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Kirby Van Note, PE Project Manager (Lic. MN) scc s:\ae\c\chanh\150965\4-prelim-dsgn-rpts\inflow and infiltration investigation_dec_13_2019_scc.docx Inflow and Infiltration Study Private Property Evaluation City of Chanhassen, Minnesota SEH No. CHANH 150965 December 16, 2019 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Kirby Van Note, PE Date: December 16, 2019 License No.: 16241 Reviewed By: Spencer Cossalter Date: December 16, 2019 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive Saint Paul, MN 55110 Distribution No. of Copies Sent to 1 Mr. Erik R. Hendricksen, EIT Project Engineer 7700 Market Blvd. Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 George Bender Assistant City Engineer 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 Kevin Crooks Utilities Superintendent 7901 Park Place Chanhassen, MN 55317 1 Lindsey Roberts McKenzie, PE Associate 3535 Vadnais Center Drive Saint Paul, MN 55110 INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 ES-1 Executive Summary The objective of this study was to perform an investigation of the existing sanitary sewer collection system, identify the need for establishing private property program and provide recommendations for implementing a long term plan to identify and remove clear water (I/I) from the Chanhassen system. Inflow and infiltration (I/I) is clear water entering the sanitary collection system through pipe defects or improper connections to the system during high groundwater conditions or during wet weather periods. The Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES) uses a network of permanent flow meters to establish community wastewater charges for treatment and peak hour discharge requirements. The MCES has identified the City of Chanhassen through their flow metering as a community in need of addressing clear water based on peak hour flow rates established at MCES Meter Station’s M413 and M439. MCES over the past fifteen years has been working with communities to develop I/I programs. The programs encourage local communities to implement investigation measures to locate potential sewer defects and remove I/I through effective sewer rehabilitation. The purpose of this investigation was to assist the City of Chanhassen in developing an I/I study which will help identify specific sewer shed areas with greater I/I contributions rates and identify I/I sources, reduction measures and establish an effective private property program which best fits the communities overall needs. Ten (10) flow meters manufactured by Teledyne Isco were supplied by SEH and used for the project flow monitoring program to establish wastewater flow conditions at eighteen (18) locations within the City of Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system. During the first phase of flow monitoring, three wet weather events (May 27th, July 1st and July 15th) produced significant increases in wastewater peak flow rates during daily rainfall periods exceeding 2.0 inches. The highest peak flow rates occurred on May 27, 2019 following the spring rains and when the groundwater typically is higher during the early spring months. Three sewer districts (5, 5A and 7) produced the highest peak rates during the May 27, 2019 wet weather event and contributed the largest amount of I/I based on peak hour rates. In order to further investigate wastewater flow conditions in the Sewer Districts 5 and 5A, eight flow meters were relocated the last six weeks of the flow monitoring period to capture additional flow data. The result of the additional flow monitoring isolated the highest peak I/I responses during wet weather conditions in Sewer Districts 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5A-2 and 5A-3. Wastewater flow rates during wet weather periods produced significant increases for more than twenty four hours after the rainfall event had ended at a majority of the meter locations. This response is typical of an indirect I/I source such as a sump pump discharge, foundation drain connection or pipe defects in locations exposed to high groundwater conditions. Based on the wastewater response during wet weather periods from each meter location, it seems intuitive that the majority of I/I sources impacting the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system would be from private property sources. Wastewater flow responses during wet weather periods not only impacted during the event but increase for days following the event, which is a typical wastewater response influenced by I/I from private property sources. Executive Summary (continued) INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 ES-2 Approximately sixty (60) percent of the City’s sanitary infrastructure is located on private property. The majority of the City resources is currently allocated to addressing the public infrastructure and city staff efforts need to continue to maintain a properly functioning sanitary sewer collection system which includes the effective management of I/I within acceptable limits required by the MCES. In order to meet MCES peak hour flow rate requirements and reduce I/I to acceptable levels within the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system, additional measures will be necessary on the sanitary sewer infrastructure on public right of way. But the main focus of meeting MCES wastewater requirements should focus on private property inspection (PPI) and repair program. The recommended PPI program includes a CCTV inspection through the stack cleanouts inside each building with a push style camera. The entire building service lateral would be televised noting any issues or potential I/I defects. Any property inaccessible from the building would include a lateral launch inspection from the main lateral to complete all inspections. In addition, the adoption of a point of sale (POS) program would be recommended. During the sale of property, the owner would need a permit by the City to verify it was in compliance with the sewer ordinance. The recommendations include focusing on sewer districts (5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5A-2 and 5A-3) with highest peak hour flow rates and I/I contributions which have the greatest impact on the MCES I/I program policy. Direct connections to the sanitary sewer such as those related to sump pump discharges or foundation drain connections should be removed first because they contribute a rapid I/I response as part of the initial peak hour flow rate and typically deliver the initial I/I response under wet weather conditions. The following steps are recommended based on the findings of the initial investigation and identify actions to be implemented to address both the public and private portions of the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system. 1. Target future CCTV and sewer lining projects on Sewer Districts 5, 5A, 7 and 7A. 2. Incorporate a manhole inspection program into the sewer lining program and in flooding and high groundwater areas. 3. Conduct a smoke testing investigation in Sewer District 5-3. 4. Implement a public education program to educate residents about I/I, current impact on the City’s infrastructure and what can be done to successfully manage it. 5. Implement a PPI program which will either be voluntary or mandatory. A mandatory program will require a review and update of the current city sewer ordinance. 6. Continue to review and revise the sewer ordinance as needed in order to provide the proper enforcement language to conduct and gain compliance for any adopted inspection programs. 7. Perform private property inspections which include a service lateral CCTV inspection from the property’s stack cleanout to the City’s main sanitary sewer lateral. Complete the inspections in Sewer Districts 5-2, 5-4, 5A-2 and 5A-3 first. 8. Update the sewer ordinance to allow for implementation of a POS program. The overall cost of the recommendations identified in Section 7 of this study is approximately $415,500. Included in the overall recommendations is the initial private property inspection costs of $273,000. Additional cost information is listed in Section 7.3 of this study. SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 i Contents Letter of Transmittal Certification Page Title Page Executive Summary Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................ 1  1.1 Current I/I Program Background ............................................................. 2  1.2 Purpose and Objectives ......................................................................... 2  2 Previous Studies and Data Review ............................ 3  3 Flow Monitoring Program ........................................... 4  3.1 Flow Meter Reconnaissance .................................................................. 5  3.2 Flow Meter Installation and Monitoring ................................................... 5  3.3 Flow Data Review and Evaluation .......................................................... 8  3.4 Flow Monitoring Summary Results ....................................................... 10  4 Potential I/I Infrastructure Sources ........................... 11  4.1 Public Infrastructure I/I .......................................................................... 11  4.2 Private Property I/I ................................................................................ 13  5 Private Property Program Options ........................... 17  5.1 Voluntary Residential Inspections ......................................................... 17  5.2 Mandatory Residential and Commercial Inspections ............................ 17  5.3 Point of Sale Inspection Program ......................................................... 17  5.4 Additional Program Options .................................................................. 18  6 Sewer Ordinance Requirements .............................. 18  7 Future Program Recommendations ......................... 19  7.1 Public Infrastructure Program ............................................................... 19  7.2 Private Property Program ..................................................................... 20  7.3 PPI Program Summary ......................................................................... 21  Contents (continued) INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 ii List of Tables Table 1 – Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure and Parcel Counts ....................................... 4  Table 2 – Flow Monitoring Locations .......................................................................... 6  Table 3 – Wet Weather Events - Rainfall Data ........................................................... 7  Table 4 – Wet Weather Flow Results ......................................................................... 9  Table 5 – Table 5 - Program Cost Summary ............................................................ 22  List of Figures Figure 1 – Parcel Development (Sanitary Sewer Construction)  Figure 2 – May 27, 2019 Wet Weather Event  Figure 3 – Follow-up Flow Meter Location  Figure 4 – September 12, 2019 Wet Weather Event  Figure 5 – Future I/I Investigation Area  List of Appendices Appendix A Flow Meter Data  Appendix B Manhole Condition Assessment Reports  CHANH 150965 Page 1 Inflow and Infiltration Study Private Property Evaluation Prepared for the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota 1 Introduction Wastewater flow generated by the residents of Chanhassen is conveyed through the City’s local sanitary sewer collection system and transported via the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptors for treatment at the Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant. The MCES monitors the volume of wastewater through a network of flow meter stations between communities to identify appropriate charges for conveyance and treatment of each cities wastewater contribution. Inflow and infiltration (I/I) is clear water entering the sanitary collection system through pipe defects or improper connections to the system during high groundwater conditions or during wet weather periods. More specifically, inflow is the result of a direct connection of clear water into the wastewater collection system including a catch basin, area drain or roof leader connection. Infiltration is an indirect connection of clear water into the wastewater collection system which can include water entering through an offset pipe joint or broken section of pipe. Inflow and infiltration does not need treatment and reduces the pipe capacity of the sanitary sewer collection system to convey wastewater for treatment. During spring months and rainfall periods, I/I can significantly reduce the pipe capacity and under extreme conditions cause wastewater to exit or overflow the sanitary sewer collection system. Raw sewage exiting the sanitary sewer causes environmental health issues concerns and is regulated by state and federal agencies. The MCES is fined by these agencies if any untreated wastewater exits the sanitary sewer collection system. To maintain pipe capacity and reduce the potential for wastewater exiting the sanitary sewer, MCES has established guidelines for acceptable I/I rates for each community in the Twin Cities metropolitan region. Through their I/I program, MCES has established peak hour discharge limits by community or sewer shed if multiple flow meter locations to identify a communities flow contributions to their interceptors are necessary. The City of Chanhassen has been identified through MCES’s I/I flow metering program, as a community in need of addressing clear water based on flows at MCES Meter Station’s M413 and M439. The two MCES meter stations are used to establish community wastewater charges for treatment and peak hour discharge requirements within Chanhassen. In order to identify future steps in reducing wastewater flow rates above the MCES peak hour guideline, the City of Chanhassen retained Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH). The objective of this study was to perform an investigation of the existing sanitary sewer collection system, identify the need for establishing private property program and provide recommendations for implementing a long term private property program to remove I/I from the Chanhassen collection system. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 2 1.1 Current I/I Program Background In order to meet future growth projections in the Twin Cities metro area, MCES completed a study to evaluate the capacity of their interceptors supporting the local community sanitary sewer collection systems. The study concluded that the interceptors would need to be upgraded in capacity to meet increase demand in the next thirty years. Pipe capacity in their interceptors would be adequate to meet future demand if I/I could be effectively managed within the communities. The study concluded that proper management of I/I would be less costly that increasing interceptor pipe capacity. Thus, MCES over the past fifteen years has been working with communities to develop I/I programs. The programs encourage local communities to implement investigation measures to locate potential sewer defects and remove I/I through effective sewer rehabilitation. In addition, MCES established community goals to develop sustainable I/I programs which would be effective in developing short and long range strategies for I/I reduction. Prior to MCES’s programs, the City of Chanhassen conducted their own sump pump inspection program in the late 1990’s in an effort to eliminate illicit discharges. In 2002, the City conducted a feasibility study for a sewage flow monitoring program with the goal of achieving fair and equitable allocations of the wastewater treatment costs provided by the MCES. Since then, the City has completed public sanitary sewer infrastructure and appurtenance inspections, repairs and upgrades with the goal of reducing I/I from the sanitary sewer collection system. Although many improvements have been implemented, the wastewater flow data from the MCES meter stations still indicate many areas of the overall Chanhassen sanitary collection system are experiencing I/I issues during wet weather periods. 1.2 Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this investigation was to assist the City of Chanhassen in developing an I/I study which will help identify specific sewer shed areas with greater I/I contributions rates. In addition, work with the City staff to identify I/I sources, reduction measures and establish an effective private property program which best fits the communities overall needs. The investigation objectives were as follows:  Perform necessary flow monitoring to determine greater I/I contribution areas during wet weather flow conditions.  Establish a baseline for future rehabilitation success.  Rank areas with high I/I potential so the City can focus on the portion of the collection system with the greatest potential reduction.  Summarize the findings of the flow monitoring program, identify and evaluate private property alternatives and provide recommendations for a future private property investigation and remediation program.  Review city ordinances and provide recommendations for ordinance revisions to support future private property program measures.  Identify a long term flow monitoring program, as needed, to establish future I/I abatement success.  Work with city staff to develop and prepare educational materials to support future private property program and I/I abatement initiatives. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 3 2 Previous Studies and Data Review A kick-off meeting with City and SEH staff was completed to collect and review all available information (maps, flow data, manhole/pipe data, GIS database, etc.) provided by the City. In addition, a general background review of local surface soils, land use maps, and any available monitoring well data from state resources were reviewed to help understand local soil moisture conditions over time and the relationship between groundwater and I/I. Overall, the available data proved inconclusive in providing detailed information to use for with proposed I/I investigation(s). The project team meeting was also used to review operation and maintenance procedures with staff in order to identify sub-basin boundaries based on review of existing sewer maps and GIS data. Based on a preliminary review of the collection system, SEH identified ten (10) sub-basins or sewer districts used for the initial flow monitoring investigation. An eleventh sewer district was established later in the project after obtaining flow data from the MCES permanent M419 meter station referred in this investigation as District 7A. Each of the preliminary flow meter locations were discussed in regards to how they would be effective based on work completed to date on the public infrastructure. After discussion among the project team, a flow monitoring network was agreed to along with establishment of a numbering system with recommendations on the continued use of the numbering format for long-term use. The project files from the sump pump investigation completed in the late 1990’s were made available by the City along with previous closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection tapes. A sampling of data was reviewed by SEH staff to gain a better understanding of the City’s sanitary collection system. A meeting with the City’s GIS consultant was arranged to gain a better understanding of the GIS data available for future use on this project and I/I investigation projects in the future. Additional information included areas where public infrastructure improvements have been made prior to this investigation and individual parcel data. Figure 1, included at the end of this document, presents the City’s overall sanitary sewer collection system with each specific flow meter location used to collect wastewater flow measurements during study. The two permanent MCES meter stations (M413 and M419) used within the study were also identified in Figure 1 along with city parcel data. The parcel data was obtained from Carver County files and is not complete in some areas. Regardless, the data that was available was helpful in establishing a timeline of city development over the years. In addition, the parcel data was helpful in identifying areas for future flow monitoring based on homes built between 1960 and 1980 when residential development were likely to included provisions for handling groundwater issues. As discussed in the next section, at the start of the flow monitoring investigation, ten locations were selected for meter installations. Based on the flow data from the first three months, meter equipment was relocated to seven new locations based on the highest I/I contributions (Sewer Districts 4 and 5) during wet weather periods. In addition, a flow meter was installed in the northeast corner of the City of Chanhassen to identify potential I/I contributions from Sewer District 8. This area discharges wastewater into the City of Eden Prairie collection system before connecting into the MCES system. Overall, the flow monitoring program identified flow data results from eighteen separate sewer districts over the course of this study. Table 1 on the next page identifies the list of sewer districts used to determine wastewater flow conditions at various locations within the City of Chanhassen. The table also presents the INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 4 number of sanitary manholes and individual property parcels identified in each sewer district. This information was used to determine the potential costs associated with recommended investigation measures. The parcel data includes residential and commercial data sets and the information was obtained from GIS data as stated above. Table 1 – Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure and Parcel Counts Flow Meter District Manhole Count Parcel Count FM 1 395 1245 FM 2 184 653 FM 3 166 474 FM 4 263 1244 FM 4A 243 575 FM 4B 229 952 FM 5 246 439 FM 5-1 38 109 FM 5-2 28 72 FM 5-3 78 70 FM 5-4 46 153 FM 5A-1 99 246 FM 5A-2 150 499 FM 5A-3 65 188 FM 6 163 402 FM 7 261 500 FM 7A 94 251 FM 8 184 434 Unmetered 869 2079 Totals 3801 10585 The city has completed a number of sanitary sewer lining projects since the early 2000s as part of their operation and maintenance program and in more recent years for the specific purpose of addressing I/I issues. A number of sewer lining projects between 2013 through 2016 were completed as part of the operation improvements on the public sanitary infrastructure system. Because of the number of the lining projects which have occurred in Sewer District 5A, future private property investigations in this area could help to identify and quantify I/I sources strictly from the private property portion of the collection system. 3 Flow Monitoring Program Once the project team (SEH and City staff) was in agreement with the preliminary placement of the flow meter equipment, SEH began the process of determining suitable locations for wastewater flow metering based on pipe hydraulics, manhole configuration, equipment accessibility, etc. This section (Section 3) identifies the process used to determine the final flow monitoring locations in order to isolate I/I in specific pipe sections entering the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 5 3.1 Flow Meter Reconnaissance A field review of each potential flow monitoring site was completed by SEH staff to determine if it was a suitable location for equipment installation. Information collected included, but was not be limited to: the location of the site, diameter of the pipe(s), hydraulics of each manhole, manhole depth, elevation of the pipe flowline (including any drops), material of the manhole, and the material of the all pipes entering and exiting each manhole. All accessible manholes were inspected at or near where the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system connects to the MCES interceptor. In addition to the investigation for possible flow meter installation locations, each identified manhole was visually inspected for signs of I/I or any significant structural conditions that would elicit repair. Each potential flow meter manhole location was located with GPS using a handheld iPad or laptop computer with sub-meter accuracy. Data from the field review was recorded by field crews using an ESRI collector application software. Each flow meter location was reviewed by the project team based on the information collected during meter reconnaissance. All field data was made available electronically to the City for uploading to the City’s GIS software database. 3.2 Flow Meter Installation and Monitoring Ten (10) flow meters manufactured by Teledyne Isco were supplied by SEH and used for the projects flow monitoring investigation. Flow meter equipment was installed on May 17, 2019 at the locations identified during the meter reconnaissance phase of the project. Each location is depicted in Figure 2. Ten flow meter locations (FM 1, FM 2, FM 3, FM 4, FM 4A, FM 4B, FM 5, FM 5A, FM 6 and FM 7) were installed on May 17, 2019. All equipment was inspected and evaluated every other week in order to provide any required maintenance and to download the data. Wastewater flow data was transferred from each meter using a laptop computer for further review and analysis. Each flow meter recorded continuous raw monitoring data and summarized in 15 minute intervals to determine maximum and minimum flow rates along with total, average, and peak daily flow rates. In order to capture the data necessary to determine wet weather flow conditions, the initial ten flow monitoring locations remained in place until a number of wet weather events could be analyzed to determine which sewer shed districts had the highest I/I potential. The wastewater flow data was analyzed to determine both dry weather responses and wet weather peak flow rates. Each of the ten sewer districts were ranked according to their response to rainfall events. A technical report summarizing all the initial meter data was prepared and recommendations were presented to the City staff for additional flow monitoring. After review by the project team, it was decided to relocate eight of the ten initial flow meter locations to collect additional flow data on two of the original districts (FM 5 and FM 5A) and a previously unmetered sewer district (FM 8) which is located in the northeast corner of the city adjacent to the City of Eden Prairie. Sewer Districts 5 and 5A were selected for additional flow monitoring because they produced the highest I/I peak flow rates under wet weather events. Additional flow monitoring in Sewer District 8 was included because it was an unmetered area of the City discharging into the City of Eden Prairie. Flow meter locations at FM 5 and FM 5A remained installed along with seven additional sewer district areas (FM 5-1, FM 5-2, FM 5-3, FM 5-4, FM 5A-1, FM 5A-2 and FM 5A-3) were added to INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 6 isolate a portion of the sanitary sewer collection system in each area along with the additional flow meter installed at the FM 8 location. On August 26, 2019, the flow meters were relocated to the new locations. Each flow meter was installed and calibrated using the same approach as completed for the initial flow meter locations. The flow meters installed at the second locations collected wastewater data for approximately six weeks until October 10, 2019 when all the meters were removed. Table 2 below lists each of the flow monitoring locations utilized during the flow monitoring period. The table lists the flow meter street location, pipe size and the sanitary sewer manhole number based on the City of Chanhassen’s numbering system for each meter used in the study. Table 2 – Flow Monitoring Locations Flow Meter No. Location Pipe Size (in) Manhole ID FM 1 Great Plains Boulevard just north of Mission Hills Lane 21 35-044 FM 2 Lake Susan Park, South of Lake Drive E 10 34-149 FM 3 South of Park Road near Mallory Court 12 28-027 FM 4 West of Powers Boulevard, North of Lake Drive W 24 34-079 FM 4A Lyman Boulevard, West of Bluff Creek 21 40-005 FM 4B Stone Creek Drive, South of Coulter Boulevard 18 27-034 FM 5 North side of Rice Marsh Lake, East of Cheyenne Ave. 21 29-139 FM 5-1 Easement Southeast of Cheyenne Avenue 8 29-138 FM 5-2 Chan View West of Frontier Trail 10 23-105 FM 5-3 East of Great Plains Circle on Frontier Trail 8 23-106 FM 5-4 Frontier Trail near Del Rio Drive 8 23-195 FM 5A West of Lotus Lake, South of Big Woods Boulevard 18 18-061 FM 5A-1 Big Woods Boulevard and Carver Beach Road 8 18-054 FM 5A-2 Big Woods Boulevard and Carver Beach Road 8 18-154 FM 5A-3 Pontiac Lane East of Pima Lane 10 17-103 FM 6 Majestic Way and Windmill Drive 15 21-067 FM 7 South of Lift Station (LS) No. 3 15 02-021 FM 8 North of Brule Circle, West of Chanhassen Road 15 12-121 On the next page, Table 3 presents the daily rainfall data collected from three sources used for this study. Local rainfall data was collected from private sources and from the MCES rainfall gauge (RG-19) located just outside the northeast corner of the City of Chanhassen. The first location (identified as MCES RG-19) was collected by the Met Council just northeast of the city on Townline Road and the remaining two locations (identified as North and South Chanhassen) are located in the north central and south central areas of the City. The North and South rain gauges are operated and maintained by local sources within the City of Chanhassen through the INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 7 Community Collaborative Rain, Hail and Snow Network (CoCoRaHS). The three rain gauge locations were used to identify the daily intensity of each wet weather event and the regional coverage across the City of Chanhassen. Table 3 – Wet Weather Events - Rainfall Data Daily Rainfall Totals (in.)   Date MCES RG-19 North Chanhassen South Chanhassen May 27, 2019 2.04 1.75 1.5 June 4, 2019 0.38 0.10 0.80 June 11, 2019 0.19 n/a n/a June 12, 2019 0.08 n/a n/a June 14, 2019 0.38 n/a n/a June 15, 2019 0.21 n/a n/a June 20, 2019 0.54 n/a n/a June 23, 2019 0.47 0.60 0.50 June 27, 2019 0.33 n/a n/a June 30, 2019 0.89 2.00 2.70 July 1, 2019 2.52 2.00 0.75 July 2, 2019 0.70 n/a n/a July 4, 2019 0.24 n/a n/a July 5, 2019 0.15 n/a n/a July 9, 2019 0.30 n/a n/a July 10, 2019 0.20 n/a n/a July 15, 2019 2.53 2.00 2.10 July 20, 2019 1.82 0.90 0.90 July 28, 2019 0.47 0.34 0.30 August 5, 2019 1.09 1.10 0.67 August 10, 2019 0.19 0.20 0.72 August 13, 2019 0.87 0.48 0.32 August 15, 2019 0.66 0.63 0.57 August 17, 2019 2.49 2.32 2.52 August 20, 2019 1.49 0.74 0.70 August 26, 2019 1.06 1.06 0.95 September 2, 2019 0.73 0.73 n/a September 11, 2019 1.12 0.95 0.75 September 18, 2019 0.17 n/a n/a September 21, 2019 0.28 0.29 0.23 Notes: The wet weather dates highlighted were used in the analysis to establish I/I contributions in the study na – indicates no rainfall was recorded or the data was not available INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 8 3.3 Flow Data Review and Evaluation The following section reviews the rainfall and wastewater flow data collected during the monitoring period and the methods used to identify which sewer districts provide greater evidence of I/I during wet weather periods. A maximum peak hour rate for each sewer district was used as the measure of rating each district to define I/I contribution during the flow monitoring. During each wet weather event, I/I contribution increases the flow rates resulting in a maximum peak hour flow rate. By comparing the peak hour flow rates during wet weather events to typical flow rates during dry weather day, the amount of I/I contribution in gallons per minute (gpm) can be calculated. In addition, the peak hour flow rates identified on wet weather days can be compared with the average flow rates at each flow meter location to determine a peak flow rate to average flow rate referred to simply as a peak to average flow rate ratio (P/A). The higher the amount I/I contribution and peak to average flow rate ratio (P/A), the greater potential I/I entering the sanitary sewer collection system. Each of these measures were used to identify which sewer district to focus on for future I/I investigation evaluation and then to further locate and rehabilitate I/I sources. Examples of wastewater flow hydrographs from each district as determined by each flow meter is presented in Appendix A. 3.3.1 Rainfall Monitoring As previously presented in Table 3, daily rainfall totals from three rain gauge locations in or near the City of Chanhassen were used to determine which wet weather events to focus on during the flow monitoring period. Multiple gauge locations are helpful in determining the amount, intensity and distribution of rainfall in the area and identify if each storm event impacts isolated areas or the entire City of Chanhassen. A number of wet weather events produced rainfall in isolated areas which could make it difficult to determine I/I impact at multiple meter locations during the wet weather event. Overall, daily rainfall totals for the summer were well above normal but the number of significant (daily wet weather storm events greater than three inches) wet weather events were limited within the Chanhassen city limits. Typically, wet weather events producing greater than three inches of rainfall in a twenty-four (24) period do not occur each year but have the largest impact on I/I contribution regionally. Significant wet weather events were recorded west or north of Chanhassen with only four events producing amounts exceeding two inches of rainfall over a twenty-four (24) hour period. The largest wet weather events recorded during the flow monitoring period occurred on May 27, July 1, July 15 and August 17, 2019. During each of these events, all three of the rain gauges produced similar rainfall totals. 3.3.2 Wet Weather Flow Monitoring During the first phase of flow monitoring, three wet weather events (May 27th, July 1st and July 15th) produced significant increases in wastewater peak flow rates during daily rainfall periods exceeding 2.0 inches. The highest peak flow rates occurred on May 27, 2019 following the spring rains and when the groundwater typically is higher during the early spring months. None of the later 2019 wet weather events produced greater peak hour wastewater flow results than the initial May 27, 2019 wet weather event. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 9 Thus, the May 27th rainfall event was the basis for determining each sewer districts I/I peak flow rate by subtracting wastewater flow rates at the same time and day of the week during a dry weather period from the peak hour flow rate recorded during the wet weather event. The dry weather period used for the calculation was always the week prior to the wet weather even as presented in the hydrographs included in Appendix A. Each sewer district was calculated in a similar manner along with the peak flow rate compared to the average flow rate (referred to as peak to average or P/A) calculated from the previous week using the methodology described in Section 3.3. Later in this section, Table 4 presents the overall I/I peak flow rates and P/A results for each sewer district of the flow monitoring investigation. The calculations resulting in the highest I/I concentration and P/A values were used to identify the sewer districts that needed additional flow monitoring. The peak flow rates presented in the first column of Table 4 are the actual wastewater flow rates recorded during the May 27th and September 12th wet weather events. For some of the sewer districts, wastewater enters from other sewer districts, compounding the flow values and represents more than one sewer districts flow. This is the case with Sewer District 5 where FM 5A wastewater flow rates recorded at FM 5A are also included in the wastewater flow rates for FM 5. During the first phase of the flow monitoring, three flow meters (FM 4, FM 4A and FM 4B) were used to monitor wastewater flow conditions in Sewer District 4 because of the size of the sanitary sewer collection system. Unfortunately during the May 27, 2019 wet weather event, the flow meter at FM 4 did not record accurate data due to an equipment maintenance issue. Since the peak flow rates for the FM 4A meter location were inconsistent based on other wet weather events and could not be verified by the results at the FM 4 meter location, Sewer District 5A was selected for further investigation. After the flow meter locations were relocated, a number of wet weather events were identified but only the wet weather event on September 12th produced consistent results with close to one inch of rainfall between the three rain gauge stations. This event was used to further isolate I/I contributions from the two sewer districts (5 and 5A) using the same approach identified above. Peak hour I/I rates and P/A values were calculated for comparison purposes at each of the flow meter locations in service at the time of the September 12th event. Table 4 – Wet Weather Flow Results Wet Weather Event - May 27, 2019 Flow Meter District Peak Flow Rate (gpm) I/I Flow Rate (gpm) P/A Ratio (2) FM 1 458 273 2.15 FM 2 295 <10 1.00 FM 3 350 <10 1.00 FM 4 (1) na na na FM 4A 595 307 2.44 FM 4B 185 109 2.60 FM 5 2,160 809 2.04 INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 10 Wet Weather Event - May 27, 2019 Flow Meter District Peak Flow Rate (gpm) I/I Flow Rate (gpm) P/A Ratio (2) FM 5A 509 366 2.32 FM 6 216 154 2.92 FM 7 202 162 4.69 FM 7A 326 161 1.76 Wet Weather Event - September 12, 2019 Flow Meter District Peak Flow Rate (gpm) I/I Flow Rate (gpm) P/A Ratio (2) FM 5 398 97 1.08 FM 5-1 111 72 3.58 FM 5-2 220 175 5.95 FM 5-3 (3) 335 274 3.72 FM 5-4 204 134 4.00 FM 5A <10 <10 1.00 FM 5A-1 167 48 2.23 FM 5A-2 316 108 2.29 FM 5A-3 126 105 6.63 FM 8 286 184 3.57 Notes: (1) Data error occurred during wet weather period (2) P/A - Peak Hour Flow Rate/Average Flow Daily Rate (3) Peak increase does not correlate to the same time period as the other locations 3.4 Flow Monitoring Summary Results Based on the results of the flow monitoring, the following conclusions were identified.  The majority of wet weather events recorded during the five months of flow monitoring did not produce high intensity storm events. Four wet weather events did approach the 2.0 inches of rainfall over a twenty-four (24) period which is an amount rainfall typically recorded on the average of once each year.  Sewer Districts 5, 5A and 7 produced the highest peak rates during the May 27, 2019 wet weather event and contributed the largest amount of I/I based on peak hour rates.  Sewer Districts 5-3, 8, 5-2 and 5-4 contributed the largest amount of I/I during the September 12, 2019 after the majority of the flow meters were relocated to Districts 5 and 5A.  Although the wastewater flow rates at the M5-3 location (Sewer District 5-3) did increase during the September 12th wet weather event, the peak rate occurred a few hours in INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 11 advance of the rainfall and with a short duration of response. This response is typically found from a direct discharge or direct type inflow source, similar to a backwash from a water treatment facility, commercial discharge or a catch basin/area drain direct connection from the sanitary sewer.  Further review of the flow data from the M5-3 meter location identified additional peak flow rates on non-wet weather days with similar increases over shorter durations. After discussion with City staff it was speculated that the peaks could be the result of an industrial discharge. To date it has not been verified and further investigation is needed to determine whether or not this condition is related to I/I or an illicit discharge.  Wastewater flow rates during wet weather periods produced significant increases for more than twenty four hours after the rainfall event had ended at a majority of the meter locations. This response is typical of an indirect I/I source such as a sump pump discharge, foundation drain connection or pipe defects in locations exposed to high groundwater conditions. Based on the age of the system and the wastewater response during wet weather periods from each meter location, it seems intuitive that the majority of I/I sources impacting the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system would be from private property sources. Wastewater flow responses during wet weather periods not only impacted during the event but remain elevated for several days following the event, which is a typical wastewater response influenced by I/I from private property sources. Examples of the I/I response typically resulting from private property defects are indicated on many of the flow hydrographs presented in Appendix A. Most of the flow hydrographs from the flow meter locations in Sewer Districts 5 and 5A during wet weather events present a significant peak hour flow rate response at the beginning of the event but even after the rainfall ends the wastewater flow rates remain high for days following the event. Although other sources of I/I can contribute to the overall problem, the flow monitoring identified in this study does indicate a need for additional I/I investigation with a focus on private property sources of I/I. 4 Potential I/I Infrastructure Sources The City of Chanhassen’s sanitary sewer collection system serving residential, commercial and industrial clients consists of a collection system made up of both private property and public infrastructure. Less than forty (40) percent of a typical city sanitary sewer collection system is on public ROW. In the past, many communities have focused most of their financial resources investigating and conducting sewer repairs to remove I/I from the public infrastructure. Even though they account for the majority of the collection system, historically private property infrastructure has typically not been investigated as thoroughly. This is typically due to the difficulty in locating potential sources on private property and more importantly the investigation measures being more intrusive to property owners. 4.1 Public Infrastructure I/I Public infrastructure I/I sources can include direct inflow connections to the sanitary sewer collection system from surface water or storm sewer drainage systems such as catch basins or area drains. Indirect inflow and infiltration contributors from cracks and leaking in manholes or mainline sewer piping can also impact public infrastructure. Since the City of Chanhassen has a separate storm sewer collection system which in the past has not been utilized for wastewater INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 12 conveyance, the likelihood of a catch basin or area drain connection to the sanitary sewer system is remote. Other common inflow sources can be found through leaking pipe joints or cracks in the sanitary sewer collection system. Over the years, pipe lining and sewer repair projects have been successful in reducing I/I from the private infrastructure portions of the sanitary sewer collection system. 4.1.1 Current City Sanitary Sewer Programs City staff has focused on the public sanitary sewer collection system by implementing manhole and pipe rehabilitation projects in areas with aging infrastructure. A number of lining projects have been completed over the years including an area in northeast area of the city (Sewer District 5). The sanitary sewer lining projects are selected based on closed circuit television (CCTV) inspection. Based on a structural condition assessment and an operation and maintenance assessment within each pipe segment, identified issues are selected for rehabilitation. In many cases, manhole condition assessments are included during the CCTV inspections and verified with a visual inspection of the manholes. City staff performs visual inspections on approximately one-third of the existing sanitary manholes annually. 4.1.2 Manhole Inspection During installation of the flow meter equipment, a number of sanitary manholes were found to be leaking or have evidence of leaking through the discovery of mineral deposits on wall or bench sections of the structure. As part of our investigation, on October 1, 2019, eighteen (18) manholes were inspected using a manhole inspection camera manufactured by IBAK which provides a 360 degree scanned image of the interior of the structure. An illustration of this process has been included which identifies the equipment used to perform the manhole inspections completed under this investigation. The data obtained during the manhole inspection investigation has been included in Appendix B. Each manhole was inspected and evaluated under the National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) Pipeline Assessment Certification Program (PACP) specific for manholes, in this case, Manhole Assessment Certification Program (MACP). The NASSCO program was used to standardize conditional assessment data for all inspections whether it is from sanitary sewer pipes or manholes. Because some of the City’s and MCES sanitary manholes are located in easements or in areas with high groundwater, staff should plan on incorporating a manhole inspection program as part of their lining program to complete the sewer rehabilitation on the entire public infrastructure sanitary sewer collection system at the same time. 4.1.3 Future Public Infrastructure Programs The City of Chanhassen needs to continue their sanitary sewer collection system maintenance program through a comprehensive CCTV and lining program. The program will help the City of Chanhassen to stay in front of aging infrastructure which frequently leads to future I/I issues. In order to incorporate a condition assessment program covering the entire public infrastructure, manhole inspections should be incorporated with the CCTV pipe inspection. Future sewer Typical IBAK Camera Manhole Inspection INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 13 rehabilitation can then include both the manhole and pipe repairs together. The City should consider implementing an asset inventory program to manage all the infrastructure data recorded during CCTV and manhole inspections utilizing GIS. The data can be used to track the sanitary and storm sewer collection system condition over time to help develop long term capital improvements. Asset inventory and condition assessment for manholes is typically between $100 and $125 per manhole depending on the location and accessibility of the structure. City manholes located in easement or wetland areas and have the potential to be impacted by surface water ponding or in areas under high groundwater conditions. Targeting these areas for future inspection should be considered to reduce potential I/I through manholes during wet weather events. 4.2 Private Property I/I Private property I/I sources can include improper sump pump connections, foundation drain connections, drainage to floor drains, roof leader downspouts, stairwell or area drains connected to the sanitary sewer lateral, damaged cleanouts subject to surface drainage and/or damaged sewer service laterals. An illustration identifying many of these possible I/I sources from residential and commercial private property is presented below. Typical Private Property I/I Sources INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 14 Some or all of these potential I/I issues can be located through a variety of investigation and testing measures. There are a number of private property investigation (PPI) programs that can be implemented to locate specific sources. Many of these programs require access through the property owner’s residence or business. A more recent investigation method that is being utilized is the investigation of the private service lateral from access within the public main line sewer. The following section reviews each private property measure for potential implementation by the City of Chanhassen. 4.2.1 Potential Investigative Options Although there may be other investigation approaches, this study focuses on the three potential approaches to locating private property I/I sources which have been successfully implemented by other local area communities. The first two methods would require access to the owner’s residence or business and the remaining measures can be performed without property access. Each investigation measure is reviewed in the next sections along with examples of where these methods have been successfully implemented by local communities in the Twin Cities area. 4.2.2 Sump Pump/Building Inspection A building inspection is the least expensive PPI program but requires approval from the owner to enter the structure in order to complete the inspection. A trained field inspector reviews the exterior of the structure to verify that any surface water drainage connections such as roof leaders/drains or yard drains are not connected the building’s sewer lateral. An inspection of the basement is completed to verify any potential sump pumps or basement surface water drainage features are properly discharged outside of the structure and are draining away from the building. A successful sump pump or building inspection program relies on a well-designed public education program in order to be effective. Education of the public on the merits of the PPI program will increase owner cooperation and allow greater success and buy-in to the program. PPI programs with public education such as city web site articles, letters, community open houses, etc. are generally received with greater cooperation by the public. Public cooperation typically results in a higher success rate of getting a large percentage of completed inspections throughout the program area. The building inspection process can be completed in 20 to 30 minutes but information about the service lateral condition or the presence of sub-surface drainage pipe such as a foundation drain connection will not be located using this investigation measure. As indicated in Section 2, the City of Chanhassen implemented a sump pump inspection program in the 1990’s that was successful in locating a number of sump pump discharges improperly connected to the sanitary sewer. The current project team reviewed the records supplied by City staff on the previous sump pump program and according to City records almost all of the homes were brought into compliance with the current ordinance at the conclusion of the project. It is difficult to determine today if the all properties are still in compliance with the current sewer ordinance. Additionally, the inspection results do not account for all of the structures that have been constructed since the completion of the program. A number of Twin Cities metro communities have been successful in effectively removing I/I by implementing a building inspection and sump pump disconnect program. The City of Eagan completed a sump pump program requiring the inspection of over 22,000 properties and were INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 15 able to reduce their peak I/I flow rates below the allowable peak hour flow rate established by the MCES. A similar program was successfully implemented in the City of Forest Lake as well. The City of Minnetonka implemented a building inspection program along with a manhole rehabilitation program in order to reduce their I/I problem. To date, Minnetonka has been able to reduce their peak hour discharges by 15 to 20 percent. Portions of the city still remain above the allowable goal established under the MCES I/I program but the city continues to work towards the removal of I/I through the success they have had so far. 4.2.3 Service Lateral CCTV Inspection A number of first ring cities such as Golden Valley and West St. Paul believe their issue is a combination of sump pump and foundation drain connections to the building sewer service lateral. In order to identify and locate foundation drain connections, a closed circuit television (CCTV) camera is pushed through the building stack cleanout, typically at the basement level, out to the main sewer connection in the public ROW. A CCTV camera technician is able to not only inspect the building but perform a condition assessment of the sewer service lateral to check for improper connections. Additionally, the camera technician is able to check each connection by running water from inside the building to verify it is properly plumbed to the sanitary sewer. Typically, a PPI program involving a full service lateral inspection can be more difficult to get public support for and usually requires a robust public education program and a strong sewer ordinance for enforcement. Without the proper ordinance, typically less than thirty (30) percent of the property owners agree to allow the inspection to happen under a voluntary program. Other problems in completing a successful inspection can include the lack of access to the lateral or obstructions within the pipe caused by roots or structural pipe failures. The City of Columbia Heights is presently completing a service lateral inspection project but only on a voluntary basis. The City is using the information gained in the current PPI program to help establish direction for a more comprehensive program which will involve modifications to their existing sewer ordinance for more enforcement. To date, they have only been able to only get into about thirty-five (35) percent of the private properties. More communities have had success implementing a point of sale (POS) inspection program which after updating their sewer ordinance allows the city to perform the service lateral inspection anytime the property changes ownership. The only problem with this program is that it only addresses the properties that change ownership. If the City has a low home turnover rate, it may take too long to effectively remove PPI I/I sources. The City of Golden Valley has significantly reduced their I/I contributions by implementing a point of sale private property service lateral inspection program. In 2008, the City of Golden Valley implemented a mandatory point of sale program and has inspected more than 6,000 buildings over the past eleven years. A similar program was implemented by the City of West St. Paul within the last five years. West St. Paul started with a voluntary service lateral inspection program but after continuing to exceed their peak hour allowable limits set by the MCES, they expanded their program to a mandatory program with a goal of inspecting 1,400 properties each year. The number of inspections was reduced to approximately 500 private property service laterals every year which they negotiated as part of their work plan with the MCES. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 16 4.2.4 Mainline Launch CCTV Inspection Recently, advances in technology with sewer inspection and rehabilitation equipment have made it possible to inspect a service lateral by launching the CCTV camera from the City’s sanitary sewer mainline connection located in the public right of way. The CCTV camera is attached to a crawler situated in the mainline pipe and positioned at the mainline service tap or wye where the camera is then launched up into the service lateral. Depending on the inspection system, the camera can inspect up to 300 feet of service lateral extending up to the building foundation. Typical service laterals range from 80 to 120 feet. The mainline inspection approach is a less intrusive process and eliminates the possible inconvenience to the property owner during the testing. The mainline launch approach eliminates the need to enter the structure unless the service lateral has an obstruction which reduces access for the full inspection from the service lateral. This method does not allow access past the building foundation, reducing the possibility of finding improper sump pump or foundation drain connections. At the completion of the inspection portion of the program, rehabilitation efforts can also extend from the main line all the way up to through the service lateral to the building foundation or transition (clay to cast iron) pipe serving the residential or commercial property. All of the investigation and sewer rehabilitation can be completed with limited impact to the property owner during the entire process. Again, the disadvantage is the lack of potential inspection within the building site where other potential I/I sources could exist. Even though this PPI program approach can be completed without accessing the home or needing a homeowner to be present, the City may still need to consider how to properly handle the liability of inspecting a private infrastructure without prior authorization from the homeowner. The reality is that no matter how the PPI program is implemented, the property owner’s approval will be necessary. The City of Saint Paul and the MCES, under a three year grant program offered by the MCES, are currently performing a private property pilot project on a small residential area on the West Side of the city. The City of Saint Paul has implemented a flow monitoring and private property inspection program designed to determine the most effective and efficient methods to reduce private property I/I within the pilot area. The flow monitoring program will be used to monitor the effect of implemented private sewer lateral rehabilitation measures once completed. The city started with a voluntary CCTV sewer lateral inspection program originating at the property stack cleanout inside each building which only provided successful inspections in approximately thirty (30) percent of the residential properties. The remaining properties (approximately 70%) were inspected using a mainline launch CCTV camera which increased the percentage of successful inspection to over ninety-five (95) percent. At this time, the City of Saint Paul is reviewing the data collected during the inspection process and evaluating options for sewer lateral rehabilitation. The repair work will be implemented in 2020 with additional flow monitoring in 2021 to evaluate the impact of I/I reduction. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 17 5 Private Property Program Options A number of investigative programs have been implemented by communities to identify and remove I/I located on private property. They include the following:  Voluntary Residential Inspections  Mandatory Residential and Commercial Inspections  Point of Sale  Pilot Studies Each of these programs have been implemented with various degrees of success depending upon which PPI program method was implemented and the strength of the enforcement language in the sewer ordinance supporting the PPI program. Any of the PPI investigation methods listed above could be implemented in conjunction with a street reconstruction or infrastructure improvement project. 5.1 Voluntary Residential Inspections Program development based on a voluntary inspection approach by the public are generally the easiest to implement because residents are in control of their response to the issue. They are not required to take action to the City’s program request. This program has the least potential for success on a wide scale and typically results in less than thirty (30) percent inspection success. An effective public notification process can potentially increase the success of a voluntary private property program and the number of successful inspections 5.2 Mandatory Residential and Commercial Inspections Mandatory inspection programs can be more effective but are generally more difficult to implement because a sewer ordinance is required to enforce property owner action to comply with any city request. This program has the highest potential for inspecting all of the target properties but the difficult part is getting public acceptance and the proper ordinances in place to enforce the program. The first key to implementation of this program is an effective public involvement campaign to educate the public on the overall benefits of the program. Public education would consist of articles on the community website, newsletters and public forums to discuss the benefits of the program. Updating the sewer ordinance would be the next step for implementing a mandatory inspection program. Additions to the sewer ordinance would include requirements for the inspection, results for non-compliance, requirements for repairs, and schedules for compliance. Updating a sewer ordinance will depend on the type of inspection program conducted by the City of Chanhassen. 5.3 Point of Sale Inspection Program Private property inspections based on a point of sale (POS) program are also mandatory in that they are typically required by the city at the change of ownership from any property owner. Any real estate transaction would require a permit and subsequent inspection issued by the city in order to demonstrate the building’s service lateral is not contributing I/I to the city’s sanitary sewer collection system. This program would also require specific language in the sewer ordinance to support the POS program. If any service lateral defects were identified during the inspection, the current property INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 18 owner would either need to repair any issue or put the money in escrow so future corrections could be funded by the new property owner. The success of this program is dictated by each City’s turnover rate the real estate market and can be coupled with a voluntary or mandatory programs focused on smaller areas of the city. 5.4 Additional Program Options There are a number of communities locally and nationally which have adopted private property programs in coordination with their street reconstruction programs. Typically, sanitary sewer inspection (CCTV) is completed before any street reconstruction is implemented in order to evaluate all of the infrastructure in the project area to ensure all necessary repairs can be completed at the same time. By incorporating private property service lateral inspection as part of the street reconstruction program, cost can be reduced to repair the private infrastructure and can result in more homeowner buy-in. Another private property program with a more focused approach is through a pilot study designed to specifically address I/I. Municipalities through initial I/I investigation measures, such as flow monitoring, first locate areas with I/I potential and then complete a private property inspection on all the buildings in the respective area. After repairs are completed, additional flow monitoring determines the effectiveness of the program. Again, this program would need an effective public information process and the proper sewer ordinance to help enforce the program. This program approach is similar to Saint Paul pilot project with the Metropolitan Council grant listed in Section 4.2.4 of this report. 6 Sewer Ordinance Requirements As stated earlier, determining the private property program that best fits the communities need and can be implemented by private residences and business is the first step. Once the program requirements are determined the following items will need to be addressed to develop an effective sewer ordinance  Identify the properties in the ordinance impacted by the changes.  The type of inspection and/or procedures necessary to meet sewer ordinance requirements.  Identify any permits and/or fees for the inspection required by the city.  Identify all compliance penalties for non-compliance of the ordinance.  Identify repair work time lines for completion and ordinance compliance. Working with city staff and legal authorities is generally needed in order to develop the proper enforceable sewer ordinance. A public education program during the drafting and implementation of the revised ordinance is a key to helping property owners understand why I/I is an important issue and how it directly impacts them and the community. 6.1.1 Private Property Inspection Education An effective education program will help establish the political will to insure property owner compliance. Property owner acceptance is often an issue with elected officials and city staff who have to approve of the private property investigation (PPI) program. Community education and public outreach can educate everyone on the costs and benefits of implementation of a PPI INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 19 program. Some of the methods which can be used to educate the public can include the following:  Articles posted on the community website  Community flyers or public mailings to introduce I/I information  Public meetings to introduce PPI programs  Public school education – introduction to I/I and how is it important  Develop frequently asked questions (FAQ) flyers and post on web-site or use community flyers The most effective education programs are ones that use multiple methods to get information to the public. The Metropolitan Council through their website has information posted on I/I which can be linked to local community sites to help with the education process. In addition, there a many examples available through collaborating with other communities to identify effective I/I educational materials. 6.1.2 Potential PPI Program Costs Private property program costs vary depending on the type of adopted measures implemented by communities. A building inspection program including the public notification process can range from $50 to $75 per building for residential property based on the cost of contracting the service with a private consultant or contractor. A commercial property inspection can range up to four times that amount depending on the number of buildings and size of property. A service lateral CCTV inspection with prior public notification is typically $300 per residential property with commercial properties again ranging up to four times that amount depending on the number of buildings and size of the property. Inspection costs on a service lateral completed through a main lateral launch program are typically the same amount. Private property repairs associated with I/I defects can vary depending on the type of repair which can include sump pump and foundation drain disconnects from sanitary sewer laterals, service lateral repairs such as broken cleanouts and/or piping and leaking offset pipe joints. Sump pump disconnects are generally the lowest cost for repair at less than $500 per property while service lateral lining or replacement costs can range from $6,000 to $10,000 depending on the length of lateral and method used to repair or replace the service lateral. Depending on how the PPI program is developed, individual private property owners may be required to share the cost burden of repair to repair their portion of the sanitary sewer collection system. 7 Future Program Recommendations Based on the results of this investigation, SEH recommends the City enhance their current inflow and infiltration program efforts under their current public infrastructure objectives and by implementing a private property inspection and repair program. The following sections identify measures to be added to complement existing public infrastructure investigations and the development of a new private property program in an effort to reduce peak I/I rates during wet weather conditions 7.1 Public Infrastructure Program For the public infrastructure portion of the sanitary sewer collection system, the City should continue their CCTV program and identify lining projects in areas where pipe conditions indicate INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 20 a need for repair. We would recommend focusing any sanitary sewer project recommendations on the areas identified in Figure 5 (Sewer Districts 5, 5A, 7 and 7A). Each of these sewer districts exhibited the highest peak inflow rates during wet weather periods through the flow monitoring program in 2019. In addition, we would recommend upgrading the current manhole inspection program using an IBAK camera as part of any sewer lining project and in any of the areas with the largest potential for I/I contribution (Sewer Districts 5, 5A, 7 and 7A). The advantage of using the IBAK camera instead of a visual inspection approach is that it will provide a visual documentation method for asset management with GIS integration to help develop future capital infrastructure improvement projects. Up to 300 manholes would be identified for inspection each year based on location (low ponding or high groundwater areas which are typically impacted by I/I). A condition assessment rating for both structural and operation & maintenance condition would be completed on each manhole inspected to determine if any future repair measures are required. I/I defects (operation & maintenance issues) would be identified as a priority for manhole repair. During the flow monitoring, Sewer District 5-3 produced the highest increases in wastewater flows during wet weather events. The peak rates only lasted for as long as the rainfall period lasted which is typical response when the I/I is being contributed by a direct source. The flow data did indicate a possible industrial discharge source that could contribute to the peaks which may require further investigation. Our recommendation in this area would be to conduct a smoke testing investigation to determine if any direct source of inflow is discharging into the sanitary sewer if the flows cannot be fully attributed to an industrial source. 7.2 Private Property Program Implementing a successful PPI program is a difficult tasks which may need to be addressed with a couple of options. Our recommendation would be to implement a program which first educates the public on the need to address the I/I issue and its importance to the community. A PPI program starts with public education through methods discussed in Section 6.6.1. The next step would be to target the areas in the problem districts, where the flow monitoring indicated the highest I/I concentration during wet weather events (Sewer Districts 5-2, 5-4, 5A-2 and 5A-3). We would recommend performing service lateral inspections on individual residential properties either through a voluntary program or revising the sewer ordinance to incorporate the proper language for the enforcement of mandatory inspections. Using a voluntary inspection approach, additional information could be obtained to help identify the specific I/I problems and the scope of the problems. This information could be helpful in drafting sewer ordinance revisions tailored to the type of PPI program approach initiated by the City of Chanhassen. The PPI program we would recommend includes a CCTV inspection through the stack cleanouts inside each building with a push style camera. The entire building service lateral would be televised noting any issues or potential I/I defects. As stated earlier in this report, approximately thirty (30) percent of residents during voluntary programs allow the inspection to be initiated. The PPI program may need to include a lateral launch inspection from the main lateral to complete all the inspections in the area. The addition of the lateral launch inspection method would increase the inspection success. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 21 We would recommend adopting a point of sale program. During the sale of property, the owner would need a permit by the City to verify it was in compliance with the sewer ordinance. Any improper sewer lateral connections or defects would either need to be repaired prior to sale or escrow funds for any repairs would need to be established for the future owner. Any revisions to the existing sewer ordinance would require enforcement language mandating an inspection permit complying with the sewer ordinance for any property sold within the City of Chanhassen to support the point of sale (POS) program. We would also recommend prioritizing I/I defects which can have the greatest impact on the MCES I/I program policy. Direct connections to the sanitary sewer such as those related to sump pump discharges or foundation drain connections should be the ones removed first because they contribute a rapid I/I response as part of the initial peak hour flow rate and typically deliver the initial I/I response of the private property defects. 7.3 PPI Program Summary This section provides an overall summary of our recommendations for locating and removing I/I from the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system. The actions proposed are designed to provide future direction for the City to maintain their infrastructure and manage their I/I based on MCES requirements for wastewater discharge into the regional interceptors. The following steps are recommended based on the findings of the initial investigation and identify actions to be implemented to address both the public and private portions of the Chanhassen sanitary sewer collection system. 1. Target future CCTV and sewer lining projects on Sewer Districts 5, 5A, 7 and 7A. 2. Incorporate a manhole inspection program into the sewer lining program and in flooding and high groundwater areas. 3. Conduct a smoke testing investigation in Sewer District 5-3. 4. Implement a public education program to educate residents about I/I, current impact on the City’s infrastructure and what can be done to successfully manage it. 5. Implement a PPI program which will either be voluntary or mandatory. A mandatory program will require a review and update of the current city sewer ordinance. 6. Continue to review and revise the sewer ordinance as needed in order to provide the proper enforcement language to conduct and gain compliance for any adopted inspection programs. 7. Perform private property inspections which include a service lateral CCTV inspection from the property’s stack cleanout to the City’s main sanitary sewer lateral. Complete the inspections in Sewer Districts 5-2, 5-4, 5A-2 and 5A-3 first. 8. Update the sewer ordinance to allow for implementation of a POS program. The estimate cost of the program will depend on whether a voluntary or mandatory program is initiated. Table 5 on the next page details the costs based on a mandatory program implemented in the recommended sewer districts. INFLOW AND INFILTRATION STUDY CHANH 150965 Page 22 Table 5 – Table 5 - Program Cost Summary CCTV/Sewer Lining Projects $80,000 Manhole Inspection Program $37,500 Smoke Testing Investigation $12,000 Public Education $3,000 Private Property Sewer Lateral Inspections $273,000 Sewer Ordinance Revisions $10,000 The cost of the private property sewer lateral inspections have been estimated based on the four recommended sewer districts below to begin the program and the number of developed parcels identified in Table 1. The sewer lateral inspection costs listed in Table 5 breakdown as follows:  Sewer District 5-2 $22,000  Sewer District 5-3 $46,000  Sewer District 5A-2 $149,000  Sewer District 5A-3 $56,000 The sewer repair costs will depend on the types of problems uncovered as a result of the private property inspections. Since limited grant funds are available currently to fund these programs, the repairs generally are paid by the property owners. The initial inspection can either be paid by the City of Chanhassen or included as a permit fee at the time of inspection. Other communities have paid the initial inspection fee but required the property owner to incur the remaining costs of the repairs. Figures Figure 1 – Parcel Development (Sanitary Sewer Construction) Figure 2 – May 27, 2019 Wet Weather Event Figure 3 – Follow-up Flow Meter Location Figure 4 – September 12, 2019 Wet Weather Event Figure 5 – Future I/I Investigation Area Appendix A Flow Meter Data Appendix B Manhole Condition Assessment Reports Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-108Structure Number: 7.65 ft.Rim to Invert: 7.65 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 0.75 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.50 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Light Rain Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 3 - moderate defects - deterioration may continue, at a 10 to 20 year timeframe 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 1 of 36 23-108MH Chimney Material: 26.70 in.0.96 in.Chimney Depth: 5.28 in. Chimney | Cone 46.00 in. 7.14 in. Wall Material: 5 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 7.65 8.00 Lined VCP.Out Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 10 6.31 4.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 2 5.67 4.00 Minor cracks and roots in pipe seal. In Cast Iron SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 4 4 6.67 4.00 Roots around pipe seal.In Cast Iron DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 3 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 2 of 36 23-108MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-110Structure Number: 9.28 ft.Rim to Invert: 9.28 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 0.75 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.50 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Gasketed_Solid Lid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 3 - moderate defects - deterioration may continue, at a 10 to 20 year timeframe 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 3 of 36 23-110MH Chimney Material: 26.40 in.1.57 in.Chimney Depth: 6.06 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 8.19 in. Wall Material: 5 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Defective Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 3 - moderate defects - deterioration may continue, at a 10 to 20 year timeframe 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 9.28 8.00OutVitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 9 8.87 8.00 Lined VCP.In Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 1 8.89 8.00 Lined VCP. Infiltration near pipe seal. In Vitrified Clay Pipe DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 4 2 9.14 8.00 Lined VCP. Infiltration near pipe seal. In Vitrified Clay Pipe DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 5 5 5.10 Yes Good 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 4 of 36 23-110MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-114Structure Number: 7.75 ft.Rim to Invert: 7.75 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 3 - moderate defects - deterioration may continue, at a 10 to 20 year timeframe 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 5 of 36 23-114MH Chimney Material: 26.40 in.1.71 in.Chimney Depth: 5.98 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 7.02 in. Wall Material: 3 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Defective Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedVitrified Clay Concrete (precast) Conical centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Pipe Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 3 - moderate defects - deterioration may continue, at a 10 to 20 year timeframe 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 7.75 10.00 Possibly Lined VCP. Deposits covering majority of pipe surface. Out Vitrified Clay Pipe DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Defective No 3 2 9 7.57 Yes Needs Repair 3 3 12 7.50 10.00 Pipe material looks like PVC. In Polyvinyl Chloride DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 4 3 7.05 4.00 Corrosion/pitting of pipe. Infiltration near pipe seal. In Cast Iron DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Defective No 3 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 6 of 36 23-114MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-116Structure Number: 8.42 ft.Rim to Invert: 8.42 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Channel is both concrete (cast in place) and VCP. Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 3 - moderate defects - deterioration may continue, at a 10 to 20 year timeframe 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 7 of 36 23-116MH Chimney Material: 23.40 in.0.83 in.Chimney Depth: 5.11 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 7.83 in. Wall Material: 5 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Defective Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 3 - moderate defects - deterioration may continue, at a 10 to 20 year timeframe 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 8.42 10.00 Lined VCP. Minor cracks in pipe seal. Out Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 2 11 8.28 10.00 Lined VCP. Root infiltration protruding through pipe seal. In Vitrified Clay Pipe DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 3 3 12 5.54 6.00 Root infiltration protruding through pipe seal. In Not Known DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 3 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 8 of 36 23-116MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 18-083Structure Number: 11.98 ft.Rim to Invert: 11.98 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 9 of 36 18-083MH Chimney Material: 26.00 in.1.65 in.Chimney Depth: 6.03 in. Chimney | Cone 47.40 in. 11.47 in. Wall Material: 7 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Concrete (precast) Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 11.98 8.00OutPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 11.98 8.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 3 11.75 10.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 10 of 36 18-083MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 18-103Structure Number: 11.67 ft.Rim to Invert: 11.67 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound Stained Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 11 of 36 18-103MH Chimney Material: 26.50 in.1.98 in.Chimney Depth: 6.43 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 11.02 in. Wall Material: 6 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Concrete (precast) Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 11.67 8.00OutPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 11.43 8.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 12 of 36 18-103MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 18-111Structure Number: 18.00 ft.Rim to Invert: 18.00 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.25 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 13 of 36 18-111MH Chimney Material: 26.30 in.2.08 in.Chimney Depth: 6.38 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 17.48 in. Wall Material: 11 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Concrete (precast) Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 18.00 8.00OutPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 17.92 8.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 14 of 36 18-111MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 18-113Structure Number: 15.71 ft.Rim to Invert: 15.71 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound Stained Cracked Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 15 of 36 18-113MH Chimney Material: 26.20 in.1.04 in.Chimney Depth: 5.45 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 15.17 in. Wall Material: 10 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Concrete (precast) Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 15.71 8.00OutPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 15.69 8.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 16 of 36 18-113MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 18-114Structure Number: 14.48 ft.Rim to Invert: 14.48 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Light Rain Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 17 of 36 18-114MH Chimney Material: 26.40 in.1.11 in.Chimney Depth: 5.42 in. Chimney | Cone 46.50 in. 13.92 in. Wall Material: 9 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Concrete (precast) Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 14.48 8.00OutPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 11 14.23 8.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 18 of 36 18-114MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 18-115Structure Number: 14.38 ft.Rim to Invert: 14.38 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 19 of 36 18-115MH Chimney Material: 26.60 in.1.08 in.Chimney Depth: 5.38 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 13.73 in. Wall Material: 9 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Concrete (precast) Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 14.38 8.00OutPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 14.23 8.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 20 of 36 18-115MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:25.75 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 25.75 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 18-116Structure Number: 18.30 ft.Rim to Invert: 18.30 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.00 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.50 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Light Rain Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 21 of 36 18-116MH Chimney Material: 23.70 in.1.33 in.Chimney Depth: 5.77 in. Chimney | Cone 47.20 in. 17.80 in. Wall Material: 12 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Defective Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Concrete (precast) Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 18.30 10.00 Lined VCP. Minor infiltration near pipe seal. Out Vitrified Clay Pipe DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 2 9 9.83 8.00 Lined VCP.In Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Outside Drop Upper Sound No 1 3 9 18.06 8.00InVitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Outside Drop Lower Sound No 1 4 12 18.33 8.00 Infiltration near pipe seal. In Polyvinyl Chloride DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 22 of 36 18-116MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:25.75 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 2Pick Holes: 25.75 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-100Structure Number: 16.33 ft.Rim to Invert: 16.33 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.00 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.50 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Channel is both VCP and formed (cast in place) concrete. Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Vented Circular Cast Iron > 1 1/2 inch (38mm) <= 2 inch(50mm) Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Light Rain Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen Sheeting ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 23 of 36 23-100MH Chimney Material: 23.60 in.1.69 in.Chimney Depth: 6.07 in. Chimney | Cone 47.30 in. 15.73 in. Wall Material: 10 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Concrete (precast) Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 16.33 10.00 Lined VCP.Out Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 10 5.00 4.00InNot Known SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 1 16.15 10.00 Lined VCP. Infiltration near pipe seal. In Vitrified Clay Pipe DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 24 of 36 23-100MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-106Structure Number: 8.64 ft.Rim to Invert: 8.64 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 0.75 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen Sheeting ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 25 of 36 23-106MH Chimney Material: 26.70 in.1.92 in.Chimney Depth: 6.33 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 8.08 in. Wall Material: 4 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 8.64 8.00 Lined VCP.Out Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 8.50 8.00 Lined VCP.In Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 3 8.51 8.00 Lined VCP.In Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 26 of 36 23-106MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:25.75 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 25.75 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-107Structure Number: 13.98 ft.Rim to Invert: 13.98 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.00 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.50 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: 6 metal steps and 3 plastic steps. Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Easement/Right of Way Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary Grass DirtSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 27 of 36 23-107MH Chimney Material: 25.30 in.0.96 in.Chimney Depth: 5.37 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 13.20 in. Wall Material: 9 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 13.98 10.00OutVitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 11 12.07 10.00 Lined VCP. Original VCP is fractured. Infiltration and deposits present around pipe seal. In Vitrified Clay Pipe DefectiveCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 2 3 5 12.30 4.00InNot Known SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 28 of 36 23-107MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-117Structure Number: 8.75 ft.Rim to Invert: 8.75 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Moisture in manhole looks to be coming in from above frame. No infiltration codes used. Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 29 of 36 23-117MH Chimney Material: 26.40 in.0.87 in.Chimney Depth: 5.18 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 7.63 in. Wall Material: 5 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedVitrified Clay Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Pipe Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 2 - minor defects - unlikely to fail for at least 20 years Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 8.75 10.00 Lined VCP.Out Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 8.65 10.00 Lined VCP.In Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 2 8.35 8.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 30 of 36 23-117MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 18-169ARStructure Number: 11.46 ft.Rim to Invert: 11.46 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 31 of 36 18-169ARMH Chimney Material: 25.60 in.1.38 in.Chimney Depth: 4.96 in. Chimney | Cone 47.30 in. 10.48 in. Wall Material: 7 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedPolyvinyl Chloride Concrete (precast) Conical off centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Pipe Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 11.46 8.00OutPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 11.39 8.00InPolyvinyl Chloride SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 2 10.88 8.00InNot Known SoundCircular Not KnownSound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 32 of 36 18-169ARMH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:26.00 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 0Pick Holes: 26.00 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-111Structure Number: 6.80 ft.Rim to Invert: 6.80 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.50 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.00 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Solid Circular Cast Iron Good None None Cast Iron Sound None Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen None ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 33 of 36 23-111MH Chimney Material: 26.60 in.0.96 in.Chimney Depth: 5.29 in. Chimney | Cone 47.50 in. 6.12 in. Wall Material: 2 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedConcrete (cast in place) Concrete (precast) Conical centered None Yes Not Known Sound Sound Formed Sound Yes Plastic Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: Plastic None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 6.80 8.00 Lined VCP.Out Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 12 6.52 8.00 Lined pipe.In Not Known SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 3 5.85 6.00InVitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 34 of 36 23-111MH Chanhassen Manhole Inspection Report Cover | Adjustment Ring Cover Shape:25.75 in.Cover Size: Bearing Surface Diam: 2Pick Holes: 25.75 in. Cover Insert Type: Cover Insert Condition: 0.00 in.Adjustment Ring Height: Adjustment Ring Condition: Cover Material: Cover Condition: Cover Type: Hole Diameter: Cover/Frame Fit: Adjustment Ring Type: Adjustment Ring Material: Bearing Surface Width: Cover Size Width: Asset Information 23-195Structure Number: 10.17 ft.Rim to Invert: 10.17 ft.Grade to Invert: Frame Frame Material: 1.00 in. 24.00 in. 1.00 in. Frame Bearing Surface Width: Depth: 0.00 in.Frame Offset Distance: Frame Clear Opening Diam: Frame Condition: 7.50 in.Frame Depth: Frame Seal Condition: Frame Seal Inflow: Frame Clear Opening Width: Inspection Information 150965Project: Location Details: Additional Info: Inflow Potential from Runoff: Channel looks to be liner on top of formed (cast in place) concrete. Inspection Date: SEH Manhole Rating: Additional Component Info: Evidence of Surcharge: Access Point Type: Location Code: Weather: Sound Vented Circular Cast Iron > 1 1/2 inch (38mm) <= 2 inch(50mm) Good None None Cast Iron Sound Stained Sound Local Rural Streets - Light traffic, town and city back streets, estate streets and curbside parking areas Manhole Dry Weather/Wet Ground Surveyed By: No 10/1/2019 System Owner:Chanhassen Sheeting ZBorich, SEH Access Point Use:Sanitary AsphaltSurface Type: Adjustment Ring Rating: Street: City: U-116-07002549Surveyor Certificate No.: Inspection Status: 0.00 Reviewed By: Reviewer Certificate No.: Rim to Grade: Cover Rating: Frame Rating: 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 35 of 36 23-195MH Chimney Material: Chimney Depth: 4.88 in. Chimney | Cone 47.00 in. 9.25 in. Wall Material: 6 Wall | Bench | Channel Chimney Infiltration/Inflow: Chimney Clear Opening: Cone Type: Cone Material: Cone Depth: Wall Diameter/Lenght: Manhole Steps: Bench Material: Bench Coating/Liner: Channel Material: Channel Type: Wall Depth: Step Material: Bench Present: Channel Installed: Channel Exposure: Channel Condition: Bench Condition: Wall Condition: Wall by Size (width): Cone Condition: Chimney Condition: Chimney Present: Concrete (precast) Sound Concrete (cast in place) Sound Yes Fully OpenedOther Concrete (precast) Conical off centered No Sound Insert Sound Yes Metal Chimney Coating/Liner: Cone Coating/Liner: Wall Rating: Wall Coating/Liner: Bench Rating: Channel Rating: None None None Chimney Rating: Cone Rating:1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future 1 - minor defects - failure unlikely in foreseeable future Connections Pipe No. Clock Pos. Rim To Invert (Ft) Height (In) Width (In) Pipe Comments Direction Material Pipe Seal Cond. Shape Pipe TypePipe Cond. Bulk- head Bulk- head Cond. Cond. Rating 1 6 10.17 8.00 Lined pipe.Out Not Known SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 2 11 7.71 8.00 Flow-monitoring band and probe in pipe. In Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 3 12 10.17 10.00 Lined VCP.In Vitrified Clay Pipe SoundCircular Gravity Connection Sound No 1 S:\AE\C\Chanh\150965\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\CHANH_150965_SEH_MACP_CrystalReport.rpt Page 36 of 36 23-195MH Sustainable buildings, sound infrastructure, safe transportation systems, clean water, renewable energy and a balanced environment. Building a Better World for All of Us communicates a company-wide commitment to act in the best interests of our clients and the world around us. We’re confident in our ability to balance these requirements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Review 2020 Key Financial Strategies List for Prioritization Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.3. Prepared By Jake Foster, Assistant City Manager File No: ADM­076 DISCUSSION City Council and staff met on January 4, 2020 to discuss setting 2020 Key Financial Strategies (KFS). The attached list is the result of both staff and council­proposed KFS goals. City staff is looking for discussion and any modifications to the proposed KFS list as written. The finalized list will be emailed to the City Council on January 13 for prioritization. This item will be brought back to the January 27 City Council meeting with the compiled results. The final 2020 KFS goals will be voted on at the February 10 City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 2019 KFS List for Prioritization1 2019 KFS Schedule Category Department Goal Action Ryan Campion Coleman McDonald Tjornhom Average Community Development/Fire Business licensing white paper Evaluate means to ensure compliance with City codes related to building and fire safety for businesses. Develop white paper for licsensing policy. Community Development - Environmental Resources Yard waste drop-off event(s)Evaluate yard waste drop-off program and funding/payment mechanisms. Engineering Review proposed street improvements in the 5-year CIP The proposed street improvement projects could be reprioritized to address the needs of individual streets versus improving the overall average pavement condition score of city streets. Administration Develop Mental Wellness "Resource Center" The City of Chanhassen is to hold roundtable discussion in 2020 aimed at mental health/wellness, dealing with mental illness, and destigmatizing mental illness. Engineering Storm and retention pond review Information from the City’s Storm Water Asset Management Program (SWAMP) will be presented to provide an overview of the current condition of the ponds within the city. Upcoming improvement plans, a proposed schedule for action and restoration, and funding sources will also be presented. Category Department Goal Action Ryan Campion Coleman McDonald Tjornhom Average Parks Various parks-related goals Build two covered/refrigerated outdoor hockey rinks at the Chanhassen Recreation Center Build permanent restroom facilities at Lake Ann Park, Bandimere Park and City Center Park Build a community splash pad attraction at Bandimere Park Identify a funding source and timeline for Lake Ann Park Preserve trail expansion Admin Consider Implementation of a Lodging Tax With this tax, the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce could help better market Chanhassen and local attractions as a destination for both metro residents and visitors in town for large-scale events (Final Four, Super Bowl, etc.). Finance Consider implementing business subsidy programs Compare other city business subsidy programs for assistance with fees (e.g. awarding grants to businesses who meet Council-defined criteria). Category Department Goal Action Ryan Campion Coleman McDonald Tjornhom Average Public Works/Parks Consider reorganization of public works and park maint. division Discuss, and determine whether there is a need to reorganize the public works department and parks maintenance division. Identify needs of impacted departments, if division efficiencies can be created, and implement determined plan for reorganization if deemed necessary. Community Development Consider downtown pedestrian/walkability improvements Identify ways to improve pedestrian access/walkability of downtown. Admin Identify ways for Councilmembers to network with other city councils/officials Explore networking opportunities for Council and other elected officials in local government (Groups, meetings, trainings, etc.) Admin Explore alternatives for high speed internet Identify areas that have access to Jaguar/Carver County, expansion of fiber, and other alternatives/options (e.g. small cell and/or 5G). Admin (CSO)Address intentional city litter Identify ways to address intentional city litter, and make code more manageable. Community Development - Environmental Resources Review involvement in GreenStep program Identify and address concerns with involvement in GreenStep Cities program (e.g. Q&A session). Engineering Identify ways to improve traffic and pedestrian safety. Identify ways to improve traffic and pedestrian safety. Category Department Goal Action Ryan Campion Coleman McDonald Tjornhom Average Finance Overall fund review Perform a more thorough review of all funds. All Review customer service touchpoints Review all customer service touchpoints in each department to provide more effective communication, and leverage technology where possible. Admin Internal review of employees/survey Solicit feedback from city employees regarding the City of Chanhassen as a workplace. Key: A 3 + Meetings B 2-3 Meetings C 1-2 Meetings Staff Proposed c:\program files (x86)\neevia.com\docconverterpro\temp\nvdc\97f6c4bf-5905-41e2-906d- 2dc84be66326\chanhassen.2030.1.schedule_for_2019_kfs.docx SCHEDULE FOR 2019 KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGIES Saturday, January 5, 2019 Staff presents suggested KFS to City Council. City Council brainstorms additional KFS suggestions. Monday, January 14, 2019 Discuss Key Financial Strategies at Work Session. Tuesday, January 15, 2019 Staff distributes electronic spreadsheet for City Council rankings. Tuesday, January 22, 2019, 8 am KFS ranking due to Assistant City Manager. Monday, January 28, 2019 Staff presents compiled rankings. City Council finalizes 2019 KFS. Monday, February 11, 2019 City Council approves 2019 Key Financial Strategies. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Designation of Official Newspaper, Appointment of Acting Mayor, Appointments to Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees, Appointment to the SouthWest Transit Commission, Appointment to the Economic Development Commission, and Appoint Youth Commissioner to Park & Recreation Commission Section ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS Item No: D.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ADM­061 PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City Council makes the following appointments: 1. Chanhassen Villager as its official newspaper; 2. Councilmember _____________ as Acting Mayor; 3. Councilmember _____________ and the Finance Director be appointed to the Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees; 4. Councilmember _____________ to the SouthWest Transit Commission for a three­year term (Seat A);  5. Commissioner to the Economic Development Commission for a term from January, 2020 to April, 2023; and 6. Zoe Erpelding as a youth commissioner to the Park and Recreation Commission." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The City Council must designate an official newspaper that meets qualifications of state statute. The Chanhassen Villager has submitted a request for this designation. Their price per column inch for 2020 is $6.79 (a 3% increase from 2019 rate of $6.59). The increase is due to projected increasing postal rates.  Residents may either subscribe or request a free subscription be delivered to their home. Staff recommends that the Chanhassen Villager be appointed as the city’s official newspaper.  Acting Mayor:The Council should select one of its members to serve as acting mayor.  The acting mayor will preside over Council meetings, stand in at ceremonies, and execute official city documents in the absence of the mayor. Appointments to the Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees:The Chanhassen Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees oversees all financial and pension matters for the association.  This includes oversight of pension investments, amendments to bylaws, and a special discretionary fund that is raised through donations and fundraising. The Board meets quarterly. State statute requires that the Board have three municipal trustees, including one elected CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectDesignation of Official Newspaper, Appointment of Acting Mayor, Appointments to Fire ReliefAssociation Board of Trustees, Appointment to the SouthWest Transit Commission, Appointmentto the Economic Development Commission, and Appoint Youth Commissioner to Park &Recreation CommissionSectionORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS Item No: D.1.Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: ADM­061PROPOSED MOTION"The Chanhassen City Council makes the following appointments:1. Chanhassen Villager as its official newspaper;2. Councilmember _____________ as Acting Mayor;3. Councilmember _____________ and the Finance Director be appointed to the Fire Relief Association Boardof Trustees;4. Councilmember _____________ to the SouthWest Transit Commission for a three­year term (Seat A); 5. Commissioner to the Economic Development Commission for a term from January, 2020to April, 2023; and6. Zoe Erpelding as a youth commissioner to the Park and Recreation Commission."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe City Council must designate an official newspaper that meets qualifications of state statute. The ChanhassenVillagerhas submitted a request for this designation. Their price per column inch for 2020 is $6.79 (a 3% increasefrom 2019 rate of $6.59). The increase is due to projected increasing postal rates.  Residents may either subscribe orrequest a free subscription be delivered to their home.Staff recommends that the Chanhassen Villager be appointed as the city’s official newspaper. Acting Mayor:The Council should select one of its members to serve as acting mayor.  The acting mayor willpreside over Council meetings, stand in at ceremonies, and execute official city documents in the absence of themayor.Appointments to the Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees:The Chanhassen Fire Relief Association Boardof Trustees oversees all financial and pension matters for the association.  This includes oversight of pension investments, amendments to bylaws, and a special discretionary fund that is raised through donations and fundraising. The Board meets quarterly. State statute requires that the Board have three municipal trustees, including one elected official (currently Mayor Ryan), one elected or appointed official (currently Finance Director Greg Sticha), and the fire chief (currently Chief Don Johnson).  Staff recommends that the Council appoint one of its members and the Finance Director to the Fire Relief Association Board.  According to state statute, these appointments are made annually. SouthWest Transit Commission:As part of the Fifth Restated Joint Powers Agreement for SouthWest Transit, each party to the agreement must provide two commissioners; one a member of the party’s governing body (Seat A) and one of whom shall be a member of the party’s governing body or a resident who resides in the jurisdiction of that member (Seat B).  Councilman Jerry McDonald was reappointed in January of 2017 to Seat A with a term ending 12/31/2019.  Councilmember Bethany Tjornhom was appointed in 2019 to fill the vacancy left by former Mayor Denny Laufenburger with a term ending 12/31/2020.  Appointment to Economic Development Commission (EDC): Economic Development Commissioner Ann Heinze reluctantly had to resign her commission on the EDC for work and family reasons late in 2019.  Based on feedback received at the Work Session from the City Council back in August, the next candidate to be considered would be Adam Schafer.  Thus staff recommends the City Council appoint Mr. Schafer to fill the remaining term of Ms. Heinze through April of 2023.  Staff did speak with Mr. Schafer and he would still be interested in serving on the EDC.  Included in the packet for your review are all of the applications that were not appointed back in August. Appoint Youth Commissioner to the Park and Recreation Commission:The Park and Recreation Commission bylaws permit one or two youth representatives as voting members. No youth candidates inquired about membership this past April, but Zoe Erpelding has come forward as an interested candidate. Zoe is a junior at Chanhassen High School, she worked as playground leader for the department in 2019 and she would like to get more involved in parks and recreation in the community. Her appointment would be effective from January to April, 2020 with the option of applying for a second term at that time. ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Chanhassen Villager dated December 20, 2019 Minnesota Statute 331A.04 concerning Appointment of Official Newspapers Minnesota Statute 424A.04 concerning Volunteer Fire Relief Associations: Board of Trustees Excerpt from SouthWest Transit Commission Fifth Restated Joint Powers Agreement Zoe Erpelding Commission Application Economic Development Applications 331A.04 DESIGNATION OF A NEWSPAPER FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS. Subdivision 1.Priority.The governing body of a political subdivision,when authorized or required by statute or charter to designate a newspaper for publication of its public notices,shall designate a qualified newspaper in the following priority. Subd.2.Known office in locality.If there are one or more qualified newspapers,the known office of issue of which are located within the political subdivision,one of them shall be designated. Subd.3.Secondary office in locality.When no qualified newspaper has a known office of issue located in the political subdivision,but one or more qualified newspapers maintain a secondary office there,one of them shall be designated. Subd.4.General circulation in locality.When no qualified newspaper has its known office of issue or a secondary office located within the political subdivision,then a qualified newspaper of general circulation there shall be designated. Subd.5.Other situations.If a political subdivision is without an official newspaper,or if the publisher refuses to publish a particular public notice,matters required to be published shall be published in a newspaper designated as provided in subdivision 4.The governing body of a political subdivision with territory in two or more counties may,if deemed in the public interest,designate a separate qualified newspaper for each county. Subd.6.Exception to designation priority.(a)Notwithstanding subdivisions 1 to 3,the governing body of a political subdivision may designate any newspaper for publication of its official proceedings and public notices,if the following conditions are met: (1)the newspaper is a qualified medium of official and legal publication; (2)the publisher of the newspaper furnishes a sworn statement,verified by a recognized independent circulation auditing agency,covering a period of at least one year ending no earlier than 60 days before designation of the newspaper,stating that the newspaper's circulation reaches not fewer than 75 percent of the households within the political subdivision; (3)the newspaper has provided regular coverage of the proceedings of the governing body of the political subdivision and will continue to do so;and (4)the governing body votes unanimously to designate the newspaper. (b)If the circulation of a newspaper designated under this subdivision falls below 75 percent of the households within the political subdivision at any time within the term of its designation as official newspaper, its qualification to publish public notices for the political subdivision terminates. Subd.7.Joint bidding.A bid submitted jointly by two or more newspapers for the publication of public notices must not be considered anticompetitive or otherwise unlawful if the following conditions are met: (1)all of the qualified newspapers in the political subdivision participate in the joint bid; (2)the existence of the joint bid arrangement is disclosed to the governing body of the political subdivision before or at the time of submission of the joint bid;and Copyright ©2017 by the Revisor of Statutes,State of Minnesota.All Rights Reserved. 331A.04MINNESOTASTATUTES20171 (3)the board is free to reject the joint bid and,if it does,individual qualified newspapers do not refuse to submit separate bids owing to the rejection of the joint bid. History:1984 c 543 s 23;2003 c 59 s 1;2004 c 182 s 14 Copyright ©2017 by the Revisor of Statutes,State of Minnesota.All Rights Reserved. 2MINNESOTASTATUTES2017331A.04 424A.04 VOLUNTEER RELIEF ASSOCIATIONS;BOARD OF TRUSTEES. Subdivision 1.Membership.(a)A relief association that is directly associated with a municipal fire department must be managed by a board of trustees consisting of nine members.Six trustees must be elected from the membership of the relief association and three trustees must be drawn from the officials of the municipalities served by the fire department to which the relief association is directly associated.The bylaws of a relief association which provides a monthly benefit service pension may provide that one of the six trustees elected from the relief association membership may be a retired member receiving a monthly pension who is elected by the membership of the relief association.The three municipal trustees must be one elected municipal official and one elected or appointed municipal official who are designated as municipal representatives by the municipal governing board annually and the chief of the municipal fire department. (b)A relief association that is a subsidiary of an independent nonprofit firefighting corporation must be managed by a board of trustees consisting of nine members.Six trustees must be elected from the membership of the relief association,two trustees must be drawn from the officials of the municipalities served by the fire department to which the relief association is directly associated,and one trustee must be the fire chief serving with the independent nonprofit firefighting corporation.The bylaws of a relief association may provide that one of the six trustees elected from the relief association membership may be a retired member receiving a monthly pension who is elected by the membership of the relief association.The two municipal trustees must be elected or appointed municipal officials,selected as follows: (1)if only one municipality contracts with the independent nonprofit firefighting corporation,the municipal trustees must be two officials of the contracting municipality who are designated annually by the governing body of the municipality;or (2)if two or more municipalities contract with the independent nonprofit corporation,the municipal trustees must be one official from each of the two largest municipalities in population who are designated annually by the governing bodies of the applicable municipalities. (c)The municipal trustees for a relief association that is directly associated with a fire department operated as or by a joint powers entity must be the fire chief of the fire department and two trustees designated annually by the joint powers board.The municipal trustees for a relief association that is directly associated with a fire department service area township must be the fire chief of the fire department and two trustees designated by the township board. (d)If a relief association lacks the municipal board members provided for in paragraph (a),(b),or (c) because the fire department is not located in or associated with an organized municipality,joint powers entity,or township,the municipal board members must be the fire chief of the fire department and two board members appointed from the fire department service area by the board of commissioners of the applicable county. (e)The term of the appointed municipal board members is one year or until the person's successor is qualified,whichever is later. (f)A municipal trustee under paragraph (a),(b),(c),or (d)has all the rights and duties accorded to any other trustee,except the right to be an officer of the relief association board of trustees. (g)A board must have at least three officers,who are a president,a secretary and a treasurer.These officers must be elected from among the elected trustees by either the full board of trustees or by the relief association membership,as specified in the bylaws.In no event may any trustee hold more than one officer position at any one time.The terms of the elected trustees and of the officers of the board must be specified Copyright ©2017 by the Revisor of Statutes,State of Minnesota.All Rights Reserved. 424A.04MINNESOTASTATUTES20171 in the bylaws of the relief association,but may not exceed three years.If the term of the elected trustees exceeds one year,the election of the various trustees elected from the membership must be staggered on as equal a basis as is practicable. Subd.2.Fiduciary duty.The board of trustees of a relief association shall undertake their activities consistent with chapter 356A. Subd.2a.Fiduciary responsibility.In the discharge of their respective duties,the officers and trustees shall be held to the standard of care specified in section 11A.09.In addition,the trustees shall act in accordance with chapter 356A.Each member of the board is a fiduciary and shall undertake all fiduciary activities in accordance with the standard of care of section 11A.09,and in a manner consistent with chapter 356A.No fiduciary of a relief association shall cause a relief association to engage in a transaction if the fiduciary knows or should know that the transaction constitutes one of the following direct or indirect transactions: (1)sale or exchange or leasing of any real property between the relief association and a board member; (2)lending of money or other extension of credit between the relief association and a board member or member of the relief association; (3)furnishing of goods,services,or facilities between the relief association and a board member;or (4)transfer to a board member,or use by or for the benefit of a board member,of any assets of the relief association.A transfer of assets does not mean the payment of relief association benefits or administrative expenses permitted by law. Subd.3.Conditions on relief association consultants.(a)If a volunteer firefighter relief association employs or contracts with a consultant to provide legal or financial advice,the secretary of the relief association shall obtain and the consultant shall provide to the secretary of the relief association a copy of the consultant's certificate of insurance. (b)A consultant is any person who is employed under contract to provide legal or financial advice and who is or who represents to the volunteer firefighters relief association that the person is: (1)an actuary; (2)a certified public accountant; (3)an attorney; (4)an investment advisor or manager,or an investment counselor; (5)an investment advisor or manager selection consultant; (6)a pension benefit design advisor or consultant;or (7)any other financial consultant. History:1979 c 201 s 14;1980 c 607 art 15 s 12;1981 c 224 s 210;1983 c 219 s 8;1989 c 319 art 8 s 27;2000 c 461 art 15 s 10;1Sp2001 c 10 art 16 s 1;1Sp2005 c 8 art 9 s 14;2009 c 169 art 10 s 38;2012 c 286 art 12 s 16 Copyright ©2017 by the Revisor of Statutes,State of Minnesota.All Rights Reserved. 2MINNESOTASTATUTES2017424A.04 2. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement and SouthWest Transit is to(i)provide alternative methods of providing public transit service for the Cities of Eden Prairie, Chanhassen, and Chaska and(ii) contract to provide transit and transit planning services to other entities, as approved by the Commission, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 16A.88, 471.59, 473.384, and 473.388. 3. DEFINITIONS. a) "Commission"means the organization created by this Agreement,the full name of which is SouthWest Transit. b) "Board"means the Board of Commissioners of SouthWest Transit. c) "Council"means the governing body of a Party to this Agreement. d) "Party"means any entity which has entered into this Agreement. e) "Metropolitan Council" means the regional entity established by Minnesota Statutes Section 473.123. 4. PARTIES. The municipalities which are original Parties to this Agreement are Eden Prairie, Chanhassen, and Chaska. No change in governmental boundaries, structure, organizational status or character shall affect the eligibility of any Party listed above to be represented on the Commission so long as such Party continues to exist as a separate political subdivision. After the effective date of this Agreement, an entity may join the Commission upon all of the following: (i) entering into a consolidation agreement or similar agreement with the Commission, which agreement shall set forth the terms and conditions for adding a new party or Parties including but not limited to: transfer of transit assets, funding and reserves, timing, branding and marketing, existing contracts and agreements, and withdrawal; (ii) filing with the Commission of a resolution duly adopted by the governing body of the proposed new party agreeing to the terms of this Agreement, as amended at the time of said filing,; and (iii)the filing of a resolution by the governing body of each Party approving the addition of the new party. All such resolutions shall be attached to and become a part of this Agreement. The terms and conditions of the consolidation or similar agreement shall supersede the terms of this Agreement unless specifically stated otherwise; 5. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS. a) Except as otherwise provided under Section 6 hereof, the governing body of the Commission shall be the Board which will consist of two commissioners from each Party and one at large commissioner, all as appointed as set forth below. 2 b) Party Commissioners. Each Party shall appoint two commissioners one of whom shall be a member of the Party's governing body("Seat A")and one of whom shall be a member of the party's governing body or a resident who resides in the jurisdiction of that member("Seat B"). A commissioner appointed to Seat A ceases to be a commissioner if the person ceases to be a member of the Party's governing body. A commissioner appointed to Seat B ceases to be a commissioner if the person cease to be a resident of who resides in the jurisdiction of that member. A Party shall appoint a new commissioner in accordance with 5 (b) to serve the remainder of the term created by the vacancy. c) At Large Commissioner. The Board shall appoint one at large commissioner, which commissioner shall reside or maintain a principal place of business within the jurisdiction of one of the Parties. The at large commissioner shall serve a three year term. An at large commissioner may serve no more than one consecutive term; except that the Board may, in the Board's sole discretion, extend the term for one additional year. d) Terms. Each party commissioner shall serve a 3 year term on the following schedule: Term 1 —expires December 31, 2015 and every three years thereafter. Term 2 —expires December 31, 2016 and every three years thereafter. Ten-n 3 —expires December 31, 2017 and every three years thereafter. The terms shall be assigned as follows: Party Seat Term Party Seat Term Chanhassen A 2 Eden Prairie A 3 B 3 B 1 Chaska A 1 B 2 The commissioner terms of new parties to the Commission shall be assigned using the following system, which shall continue to repeat in the same order if more than four parties are added. Assignment of terms for new Parties after New Party 4 shall continue in the same manner. If multiple Parties are added at one time the Board shall determine the number of each new party for purposes of term assignments. Party Seat Term Party Seat Term New Party 1 A 1 New Party 3 A 2 B 2 B 3 New Party 2 A 3 New Party 4 A 1 B 1 B 2 3 Commission Application Form Please complete and submit the online form below. You will be able to print a copy of the completed form when it is submitted. Application deadline is Friday, February 1, 2019. Commission Interview Dates Applicants must be available to be interviewed by the desired commission(s) on the following dates: Environmental Commission - Wednesday, February 13 Planning Commission - Tuesday, February 19 Senior Commission - Thursday, February 21 Park & Recreation Com. - Tuesday, February 26 City Council Interview Dates Applicants must also be available to interview with the City Council on one of the following dates: Tuesday, February 26 Monday, March 11 Commission Desired* Park & Recreation Commission Alternate Commission Choice-Optional* None NOTE: If an alternate commission is selected, applicant will be required to interview with BOTH commissions as well as the City Council. Adult Youth (Ages 16-18) If Park & Recreation Commission, select Adult or Youth* Name* Zoe Erpelding Home Address* 9061 Springfield Drive City* Chanhassen (for mailing address) Zip Code* 55317 (for mailing address) Print Commission Application Form - Submission #3365 Date Submitted: 12/3/2019 Preferred Contact Phone* 612-518-6108 Alternate Contact Phone 952-233-8997 If no alternate phone, enter "none" Email* zmerpelding@gmail.com Number of years lived in Chanhassen* 15 Highest level of education attained, plus degrees, if any* Currently in 11th grade at Chanhassen High School Employment History (position, employer & brief description of duties)* I worked as a Playground Leader for the city of Chanhassen under the Park and Recreation department during the summer of 2019. I led activities for and supervised children enrolled in the park camps. Attach resume (if desired) No file chosenChoose File Reasons for seeking this position* I want to get more involved in our community and the Park and Recreation Commission is a fantastic way to make an impact on the community while learning about local government. The public parks of Chanhassen are incredibly important to me as someone who spent countless hours at them while growing up in Chanhassen and has worked as a Playground Leader and earlier volunteered for the city's Teen Volunteer Program at them. It would be an honor to offer the perspective of a teenager living in Chanhassen and contribute to the improvement of our community. Specific qualifications for this position* I participated in the Park and Recreation Summer Teen Volunteer Program and I worked for the department as a Playground Leader so I have experience with the Park and Recreation program. Yes No Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* If yes, please list Yes No Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* If yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Within Chanhassen High School I am a member of 3 sports and multiple clubs. Sports: Cross Country Nordic Ski Track and Field Club: National Honor Society Students Today Leaders Forever Model UN Girl Up HOSA Book and Movie Club Please list areas of special interest* I love being active outside whether it's skiing, running, or going on a walk with my dog. I'm passionate about improving the lives of others, especially children. Chanhassen Connection Newsletter City Website Facebook Twitter Chanhassen Villager Other How did you hear about commission vacancies?* Select all that apply 8t1t2019 Chanhassen (for mailing address) https:/ ^rww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/FormCenter/SubmissionslPnn|y'2T26 Date Submittedz 7 l29 l2Ol9 Economic Development Commission Application Form On June'10,2019, the Chanhassen City Council adopted Ordinance 643 amending Chapter 2, Administration, of the Chanhassen City Code, establishing an Economic Development Commission. Please complete and submit the online form below. You will be able to print a copy of the completed form when it is submitted. Application deadline is Friday, July 19,2019. City Council lnterview Dates Applicants must be available to interview with the City Council at their Work Session on Monday, August 12, 2019. Res ide nUB usiness Status Applicants must be a Chanhassen resident and/or a Chanhassen business owner for at least two years. No other experience is necessary. Check all that apply B Chanhassen Resident E Ghanhassen Business Owner Name* Adam Schafer Home Address* 300 Trappers Pass City.Zip Gode* ss317 (for mailing address) https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/Formcenter/SubmissionslPinV2T26 Print Economic Development Commission Application Form - Submissaon #2726 \I fl[ \ + \4 \S 0 114 811t2019 Preferred Contact Phone* 9525001995 https J/vrrvv.ci.chsnhassen.mn.us,/Admin/Formconter/Submissbn sP nnV2T Alternate Contact Phone xxx-xxx-xxxx lf no alternate phone, enter "none" Email* schafer.adam@ymail.com Business Name Scout Pkg Solutions Business Address 4737 County Rd 101 #192 City Minnetonka State Minnesota zip 55345 Number of years lived in Chanhassen' 4 Highest level of education attained, plus degrees, if any* BS in Business from Herberger School of Business @ SCSU. Number of years owned a business in Chanhassen* 1 https:/ /w\ r.ci.chanhassen.mn.uVAdmin/FormcEnter/SubmissionslPnnll2726 2t4 8t1t2019 httpsJ/wwwci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/FormCenter/SubmissiondP nnu27 26 Employment History (position, employer & brief description of duties)* Owner / Managing Partner @ Scout Package Solutions. Sales and Marketing services for startup or struggling manufacturers. < 1 year. Exe. Director of New Business Development @ Alpha Packaging - Sales / Head of New business for a $350M manufacturing company. Covered Local and North America accts. 7 years. Sales Manager @ Quality Assured, lnc. - Sales for local Printer. 13 years. Attach resume (if desired) Choose File No file chosen Are you currentty serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* ,e,Yes iE No lf yes, please list Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Gommittee in the past?" '' Yes aNo lf yes, please list 3t4 Reasons for seeking this position* I have time to commit to the position as I am just starting to get my own business going. I am interested in the general welfare of the community my family lives in. I believe that being part of the EDC / advisory lwill provide humble yet honest perspectives for the best of all city residents. I come from a heritage of strong communigr action, sponsorship and philanthropy. I would like to carry that involvement as witness to my immediate family and honor to my grandparents before me. This is why I am seeking the position. Thank you. Specific qualifications for this positiont Marketing expertise https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/AdmirvFormCenter/SubmissionslPtin!2726 8t1t2019 httpsJ ,vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/FormCenter/SubmissionslP,inV2T26 Please list organization memberships and positions held* lCA. Food Shelf, Food Rescue Please list areas of special interest* Volunteering Biking lnvesting How did you hear about the Economic Development Commission vacancy?' Select all that apply E Chanhassen Connection Newsletter E City Website tr Facebook E Twifter E Chanhassen Villager E Other https:/ ,.,/ww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/AdmirVFormCenter/SubmissionstPtinv2T26 4t4 8t112019 https://wuwci.chanhassen.mn.us,/AdmirVFormCenter/Submissions/PdnU2660 Print Economic Development Commission Application Form - Submission #2660 Date Submittedt 7 I 3 / 2OL9 Economic Development Commission Application Form On June 10, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council adopted Ordinance 643 amending Chapter 2, Administration, of the Chanhassen City Code, establishing an Economic Development Commission. Please complete and submit the online form below. You will be able to print a copy of the completed form when it is submitted. Application deadline is Friday, July 19, 2019. Gity Council lnterview Dates Applicants must be available to interview with the City Council at their Work Session on Monday, August 12,2019. Applicants must be a Chanhassen resident and/or a Chanhassen business owner for at least two years. No other experience is necessary. Check all that apply E Chanhassen Resident E Chanhassen Business Owner Name* Anita Ward Home Address* 780 Preakness Lane City*Zip Code. Chanhassen (for mailing address) 553'17 (for mailing address) https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/AdmirVFormCenter/SubmissionyPnnU2660 1t4 ResidenUBusiness Status It =\4 SSt \0tt 8t112019 Preferred Contact Phone* 952457-8058 Email. rewarded0S@gmail.com Business Name Business Address City htFs:/ vww.ci.ctlanhasson.mn.us/Admiry'FormCenter/Submissionsi/Print/2660 Alternate Gontact Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX lf no alternate phone, enter "none" State zip Number of years lived in Chanhassen* 27 0 Highest level of education attained, plus degrees, if any* BA Number of years owned a business in Chanhassen* https:/ ,vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/AdmirVFo.mcenter/SubmissionsJPrinU2660 2t4 8t1t2019 https:/ rww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/FormCEnter/Submissions,/Priny2660 Employment History (position, employer & brief description of duties). TENTMAKERS Non-profi t: Office Manager Develop and administer office procedures and CRM database. Plan special events, negotiating pricing and services. Order office supplies. Country lnn & Suites: Director of Sales Responsible for overall revenue oi 122-room hotel. Developed and maintained corporate relationships for business travel. Managed social media campaigns and ads for leisure travel. Managed customer service responses to guests. Chanhassen Dinner Theatres: Box Office Manager Managed 2S-person sales staff. Developed and delivered training for box office representatives. Worked with marketing department to plan and execute special events. Consultant, self-employed Designed, developed and delivered customized training programs for local businesses. FSI lnternational: Senior Training & Development Designed, developed and delivered training programs in core business skills - communication, customer service, safety awareness, harassment awareness, effective team management and quality process. Outsourced specialized programs for technical staff - process management, foreign language. Managed company tuition reimbursement program. Attach resume (if desired) Choose File Reasons for seeking this position* lam excited to see Chanhassen focus energy on business development. As a long-time resident I feel we need to work harder to draw in new business opportunities and strengthen our economic base. Specific qualifications for this position* . Broad knowledge of business community through my previous community facing and sales roles . Willingness to hear all sides of an opportunity and work to discern the best options - Ability to be diplomatic Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?* ,Yes 9No https:/tu/ww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/Formcenter,/Submissions,/PrinU2660 3t4 No file chosen - Well-rounded and mature background that allows me to understand the needs of different types of businesses 8t'v2019 https:/Arrww.ci.chanhass€n.mn.us/Admin/Fo.mCenter/Submissions/PrinU2660 lf yes, please list Have you served on a Board, Commlssion, or Committee in the past?* ;-. Yes ONo lf yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Special Olympics Coach Buy Chanhassen SW Metro Chamber Please list areas of special interest* Family, travel How did you hear about the Economic Development Commission vacancy?* Select all that apply E Chanhassen Connection Newsletter tr City Website E Facebook tr Twitter El Chanhassen Villager g Other httpsi/ r,/wwci.chanhassen.mn.us/AdmirVFormCenter/SubmissionVPnnU2660 4t4 8t1t2019 City. Chanhassen (for mailing address) hnps:/Arww.ci.chanhassen.mn.uyAdmin/FormCenter/Submissions/PdnV2655 Economic Development Commission Apptication Form - Submission #2655 Date Submittedt 6 I 27 I 2OL9 Economic Development Commission Application Form On June 10, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council adopted Ordinance 643 amending Chapter 2, Administration, of the Chanhassen City Code, establishing an Economic Development Commission. Please complete and submit the online form below. You will be able to print a copy of the completed form when it is submitted. Application deadline is Friday, July 19, 2019. City Council lnterview Dates Applicants must be available to interview with the City Council at their Work Session on Monday, August'12, 2019. Res ide nUB usiness Status Applicants must be a Chanhassen resident and/or a Chanhassen business owner for at least two years. No other experience is necessary. Check all that apply M Chanhassen Resident B Chanhassen Business Owner Name* Michael J. Leonard DDS Home Address* 8129 Stone Creek Dr Zip Code* 55317 (for mailing address) https:/ ,vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us,/AdmirrFormcsnter/Submissions/PrinU2655 1t4 Print 8t1t2019 Preferred Contact Phone* 6124181719 https://www.ci.chanhasson.mn.us/AdmirVFormcenter/Submissions/PrinU2655 Alternate Contact Phone none lf no alternate phone, enter "none" Email* mleonard@centurylink.net Business Name Chanhassen Family Dentistry PA Business Address 8116 Mallory Court City Chanhassen Number of years lived in Chanhassen* 32 Number of years owned a business in Chanhassen* 34 State MN zip 55317 Highest level of education attained, plus degrees, if any" Doctor of Dental Surgery Attach resume (if desired) Choose File No file chosen https://www.ci.chanhasson.mn.us/Admir/FormCenter/SubmissionVPrint/2655 2t4 Employment History (position, employer & brief description of duties)* Owner/Operator of Chanhassen Family Dentistry, PA 81112019 httpsJ {w.ci.chanhassen.mn.usi/Admi Formcsnter/Submissions,/Prinu2655 Reasons for seeking this position* lmprove quality of experience for residents & visitors Specific qualifications for this position* Observational experience from living & working in area for 30+ years. Are you currently serving on other Boards, Commissions, or Committees?' 'a,Yes 0No lf yes, please list Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* a,'Yes gNo lf yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Past Charter Member & 2 time president of Chanhassen Rotary Club, current president of Chanhassen Evening Rotary Club. 34 year member of Chanhassen Chamber of Commerce/Southwest Metro Chamber. Please list areas of special interest* Helping to make Chanhassen a fun & interesting place to be. https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.usi/Admin/Formcenter/Submissions/PrinU2655 314 8t1t2019 https:/ vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.usi/AdmirvFormcenter/SubmissionsJPrinU2655 How did you hear about the Economic Development Commission vacancy?* Select all that apply E Chanhassen Connection Newsletter E City Website @ Facebook E Twitter B Chanhassen Villager E Other hltps:/ flwwci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/Fo.mCenter/Submissions'/Pdnu2655 8t1t2019 City- Chaska (for mailing address) https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.ugAdmin/Formcenter,/Submissions,/PrinU2665 Print Economic Development Commission Application Form - Submission #2665 Date Submittedt 717 / 2ol9 Economic Development Gommission Application Form On June 10, 201S, the Chanhassen City Council adopted Ordinance 643 amending Chapter 2, Administration, of the Chanhassen City Code, establishing an Economic Development Commission. Please complete and submit the online form below. You will be able to print a copy of the completed form when it is submitted. Application deadline is Friday, July 19, 2019. City Council lnterview Dates Applicants must be available to interview with the City Council at their Work Session on Monday, August 12,2019. ResidenUBusiness Status Applicants must be a Chanhassen resident and/or a Chanhassen business owner for at least two years. No other experience is necessary. Check all that apply EI Chanhassen Resident E Chanhassen Business Owner Home Address* 1291 Bluff Creek Drive (Chanhassen) Zip Code* 55318 (for mailing address) 114 Name* Dr.Edward N.Tipton, LB PhD https:/A,vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.udAdmirvFormCenter/Submissions,/PrinU2665 8/1no19 Preferred Contact Phone* 952496-9757 Email* etiplon9756@msn.com Business Name Psychotherapy Face To Face Business Address 1291 Bluff Creek Drive (Chanhassen) City (Chanhassen) Ghaska mail route Number of years lived in Chanhassen* 23 htlpsr ,wvr,v.ci.chanhas$n,mn.us/Admiry'FormCantor/SubmissiongPnnU2665 Alternate Contact Phone 612-889-3552 lf no alternate phone, enter "none" State MN zip 55318 Number of years owned a business in Chanhassen* 't7 Highest level of education attained, plus degrees, if any' PhD in Clinical Psychology, MA Clinical Psychology, MA Economics, BS Engineering, MS National Defense Analysis https:/ ^rww.ci.chanhassen.mn.ust/Admin/Fo.mcenter/Submissions,/PrinU2665 2t4 8t1t2019 https:/lwww.ci.chanhassen.mn.usi/AdmirrFormCenter/Submissigns,/PrinU2665 Employment History (position, employer & brief description of duties)* Army Engineer Officer, US Army, various assignments, '67-'71; Economic Analysis, Minerals and Metals, Billiton lntl. Verheeskade 25, den Hague, the Netherlands, '74-'77; Business Development Manager, Minerals and Metals Department, Shell Australia, Collins St, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, '77-'79; Economic Development Officer, Wilberforce & Co. Collins St, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, '79-'82; Project Development Engineer, Fluor Australia, St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, '82-'84, Project Manager, lnformation Systems, (LAIS, '85-'86, BP Australia, '86188; Gilbertsons, '88-'89; ANZ Banking,'89r92, Quality Assurance Manager (Technical Information] Systems Testing '92-'95; Shamrock Systems, Bloomington, Minnesota, '95.'0'l; Blue Cross Blue Shield, Eagen, Minnesota, '01-'04); Practicing Psychotherapist, Chanhassen, USA, '04-present. For duties, see attached resume Aftach resume (if desired) CVEddieTi pton20 1 8.doc Reasons for seeking this position* I am a civic minded person and in the helping professions. With my extensive experience in Engineering, Construction, Business Development, and Project Management and advanced degree in Economics and experience in Economic Analysis, I believe I would be able to merge many aspects of this commission's aims effectively. Specific qualifications for this position" I have conducted many studies of developmental projects (military development, natural resources, infrastructure, theme parks, manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, casino/gaming, lnformation Systems, and banking) and in several ofthese was hands-on in the design, engineering and construction. Also most of these were in managerial positions. I have also been the principal of independent company/practices and as such understand and fulfilled many legal, financial, HR, marketing, and promotional issues. Are you currently serving on other Boards, Gommissions, or Committees?' a,Yes (--, No lf yes, please list Go-Chairperson, Carver County Mental Health Local Advisory Committee, Management Board, WeCAB Eastern Carver County (volunteer transportation service for needy) Have you served on a Board, Commission, or Committee in the past?* ,a Yes ,,'No hnps:/ ,vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/AdmirVFormcenter,/Submissions,/P.int/2665 3t4 8t1t2019 https:/ ,vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.uVAdmirVFormCenter/Submissions,/PrinU2665 Please list organization memberships and positions held* CURRENT American Psychological Association, member Minnesota Psychological Association, member Australian Psychological Society, member PREVIOUS Minnesota Association Of Clinical Hypnosis, member Minnesota Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Association, member Dealer, National Association of Securities Dealers Please list areas of special interest* Engineering Gonstruction Economic Development Project Management Business Development Helping Professions How did you hear about the Economic Development Commission vacancy?' Select all that apply B Ghanhassen Connection Newsletter E City Website EI Facebook E Twitter E Chanhassen Villager E Other httpsJ rwwci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/PrinU2665 lf yes, please list Management Committee, Minnesota Hoarding Project, St.Louis Park, MN 8t16t2019 City* Chanhassen (for mailing address) https:/ rww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us,/Admin/FormCenter/Submissions,/PrinU267'l Print Economic Development Commission Application Form - Submission #2671 Date submittedz 7 /9/2o19 Economic Development Commission Application Form On June 10, 2019, the Chanhassen City Council adopted Ordinance 643 amending Chapter 2, Administration, of the Chanhassen City Code, establishing an Economic Development Commission. Please complete and submit the online form below. You will be able to print a copy of the completed form when it is submitted. Application deadline is Friday, July 19,2019. City Council lnterview Dates Applicants must be available to interview with the City Council at their Work Session on Monday, August 12, 2019. Res ide nUB us in es s Status Applicants must be a Chanhassen resident and/or a Chanhassen business owner for at least two years. No other experience is necessary. Check all that apply E Chanhassen Resident E Chanhassen Business Owner Name* Peter Adolphson Home Address* 8980 Reflections Road Zip Code. 55317 (for mailing address) 1t4https:/ ,vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/AdmirvFormcenter/Submissions/PrinU267t at16t201s Preferred Contact Phone* 612-716-2784 Email. phakma@hotmail.com Business Name Business Address ci:y Number of years lived in Chanhassen* 6 https:/ rww.ci.cianhassen.mn.uJAdmin/Fomcenter/Submissions/Print/2671 Alternate Contact Phone XXX.XXX-XXXX lf no alternate phone, enter "none" State zip Number of years owned a business in Chanhassen* None Highest level of education attained, plus degrees, if any* MBA in Finance Employment History (position, employer & brief description of duties)* 23 years at ION Gorporation, retiring soon. I have had various jobs including, Program Manager, Production Control Manager, Safety Manager, and Quote Manager. I am a former State Representative and a retired Commander of the United States Navy. https://www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/FormCenter/SubmissionslPinll26Tl 2t4 8/16i20't9 https:/ ,'i\,\,wci.chanhassen.mn.usy'Admin/FormCenter/Submissions/PrinU2671 Attach resume (if desired) Choose File No file chosen Specific qualifications for this position* State Representative for one term serving on State and Local Government, Transportation Finance and Policy, as well as Ways and Means committees. 23 plus years of personnel management in government and private industry. I have over '1000 hour of flight time in Naval aircraft and almost 300 arrested landings on air craft carriers. Are you currently servlng on other Boards, Commisslons, or Committees?* eYes ONo lf yes, please list Have you served on a Board, Gommission, or Committee in the past?* er Yes CNo lf yes, please list Please list organization memberships and positions held* Chanhassen Evening Rotary Club, Sergeant at Arms and currently Treasurer. httpsi/ {ww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/AdmirVFormCenler/SubmissionVPrinU26Tl 314 Reasons for seeking this position. I believe in an open and transparent government. Consideration of all parties views on any given project and making informed decisions on the issue at hand based on the available information. A growing vibrant Chanhassen community that people want to visit, work in and live in is of utmost importance. I bring a broad based life time of knowledge and experiences that I believe make me well suited for this position. 8/16/201S httpsJ/w\,vw.ci.chanhassen.mn.uJAdmin/Fo.mC€nter/SubmissionVPdnU26Tl Please list areas of special interest* Ensuring open and fair development of the community as a whole. How did you hear about the Economic Development Commission vacancy?" Select all that apply E Chanhassen Connection Newslefter E City Website E Facebook E Twitter ts Chanhassen Villager g Other https:/,vww.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/Admin/Formcsnter/Submissions/PrinV2671 4t4 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated December 9, 2019 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the minutes dated December 9, 2019.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Summary Minutes dated December 9, 2019 City Council Verbatim Minutes dated December 9, 2019 City Council Work Session Minutes dated December 9, 2019 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES DECEMBER 9, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated December 2, 2019 2. Approve City Council Minutes dated November 25, 2019 3. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated November 19, 2019 4. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated November 13, 2019 5. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated November 26, 2019 6. Resolution #2019-58: Designate Polling Place Locations for 2020 Election 7. Ordinance No. 651: Amendments to Chanhassen City Code and Approval of Summary Ordinance 8. Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to Rotary Club of Chanhassen, February Festival on February 1 at Lake Ann Park 9. Approve 2020 Contract for Police Services with Carver County Sheriff’s Office 10. Approve Consultant Agreement for Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project 11. Authorize Payment for Parcels 12 and 31, Highway 101 Improvement Project City Council Summary – December 09, 2019 2 12. Pulled for separate discussion All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. NEW BUSINESS: CONSENT AGENDA (12). ADOPT RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR SOUTHWEST TRANSIT. Len Simich, CEO of Southwest Transit explained the need of the City’s support for the Resolution of Support for Southwest Transit. Councilman McDonald further explained the need for this type of transportation in the southwest suburbs. Resolution #2019-59: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to adopt the Resolution of Support for Southwest Transit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. AVIENDA PRELIMINARY PLAT/GRADING PERMIT EXTENSION. Kate Aanenson presented the staff report on this item. The applicant Mark Nordland with Level 7 Development explained the reason for this extension request and the next steps moving forward. Councilman McDonald asked for clarification of the proposed changes to the PUD. Mayor Ryan asked how grading can move forward without final plat approval. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the City Council approves extension of the preliminary plat until June 30, 2020 and permits grading as stated in the conditions listed below and in accordance with the preliminary plat approvals. 1. Approval of the Stormwater Permit by the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD). 2. Meet all requirements of the WCA approval. 3. Receive approval of the plan set for grading an stormwater by both the City and the RPBCWD. 4. Placement of Outlot A in a Conservation Easement. The City shall review the easement language. 5. Boundary of Outlot A shall be staked and inspected prior to grading. City Council Summary – December 09, 2019 3 6. Provide proof of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. 7. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE CHAPTER 4, FEES. Greg Sticha presented the staff report on this item. Mayor Ryan and Councilman Campion asked for clarification of the wetland boundary and type determination fee. Ordinance 652: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council adopts an ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for 2020, not to include 15C for Wetland Boundary and Type Determination fee. All voted in favor, except for Councilwoman Coleman who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. ADOPT FINAL LEVY AND 2020 BUDGET AND 2020-2024 CIP. Greg Sticha presented a power point presentation on this item. After discussion and comments from council members expressing their opinions on the bullet points presented by staff for the 2020 budget, the following motion was made. Resolution #2019-60: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council adopts the attached resolution establishing the 2020 final levy of $11,741,368 and approves general fund expenditures of $11,899,700. It also approves the CIP for 2020 through 2024 in the total amount of $106,696,900. All voted in favor, except Councilwoman Coleman who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. ANNOUNCE RESULTS OF CITY MANAGER’S 2019 PERFORMANCE REVIEW. Mayor Ryan gave a summary of the City Manager’s 2019 performance review. Todd Gerhardt pointed out and thanked all the department heads for their assistance. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. City Council Summary – December 09, 2019 4 Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 9, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, and Roger Knutson Mayor Ryan: Again good evening everybody and welcome to our council meeting. To those of you that are watching at home or Livestreaming from the Chanhassen website, thank you for joining us this evening. For the record we have all of our council members present tonight so our first action is our agenda approval. Council members are there any modifications to the agenda as printed? If not we will move forward with the published agenda. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Ryan: Tonight we have consent agenda items number 1 through 11. All items listed under the consent agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be considered as a single motion based on staff recommendation. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired by anyone on council or here in the chambers you may request to have that item removed and have it considered separately on our agenda this evening. Are there any items that council would like to consider separately? Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Ah yes I wanted to pull the, trying to find it now but the resolution for Southwest Transit and I thought when you said we had 1 through 11 you were. Mayor Ryan: Well I know. That’s because I was wrong. Councilman McDonald: Okay. Mayor Ryan: So 1 through 12, I apologize. Councilman McDonald: So I would like to pull the resolution for Southwest Transit. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 2 Mayor Ryan: Perfect. Alright I will move that to New Business number 1 and I will move 1 and 2 to 2 and 3. Alright, so with that is there a motion to approve consent agenda items 1 through 11 from my corrected, initially there were 1 through 12. Councilman McDonald: So moved. Councilman Campion: Second. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated December 2, 2019 2. Approve City Council Minutes dated November 25, 2019 3. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated November 19, 2019 4. Receive Economic Development Commission Minutes dated November 13, 2019 5. Receive Park and Recreation Commission Minutes dated November 26, 2019 6. Resolution #2019-58: Designate Polling Place Locations for 2020 Election 7. Ordinance No. 651: Amendments to Chanhassen City Code and Approval of Summary Ordinance 8. Approve Temporary On-Sale Liquor License to Rotary Club of Chanhassen, February Festival on February 1 at Lake Ann Park 9. Approve 2020 Contract for Police Services with Carver County Sheriff’s Office 10. Approve Consultant Agreement for Lake Lucy Road Rehabilitation Project 11. Authorize Payment for Parcels 12 and 31, Highway 101 Improvement Project 12. Pulled for separate discussion All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Ryan: We have some students here from I believe Holy Family so welcome students. With no visitor presentations we will move. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 3 NEW BUSINESS: CONSENT AGENDA (12). ADOPT RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR SOUTHWEST TRANSIT. Mayor Ryan: We’re going to re-order some business as we have somebody here to present so we’re going to move to the item that was pulled off the consent agenda and move to New Business. An so we will go to that item and it is to adopt a resolution of support for Southwest Transit. Do you want to come forward and do a little presentation? Len Simich: Good evening Mayor, members of the council. I’m Len Simich, CEO of Southwest Transit. Before you tonight we have a resolution of support that we’re asking all of our cities that make up Southwest Transit, which Chanhassen is one. Eden Prairie and Chaska to issue a resolution of support. What this resolution really does, it’s going to be the base for our legislative action moving forward. Funding has become an issue for all the suburban providers. This past year we lost approximately a half million dollars in state general fund dollars that we had been receiving through the Metropolitan Council. Those dollars no longer exist. We’re also looking at an equitable distribution of the motor vehicle sales tax funding. That is really the backbone of the funding that we operate from. That has changed over the years and the suburban transit really is not receiving an equitable share of that funding so that is also described in this resolution of support. As is some of our needs in the capital arena to keep our vehicles and facilities in a state of good repair. This year we did not, or were not included in the Metropolitan Council’s bonding authorization so that is also covered here as well as providing some flexibility in terms of setting our own funding or our fare rates. Again some areas that we’ve had some difficulty. We have some of the longest routes in the whole region. We also provide a lot of different services, whether it’s special events to State Fair or other venues and we really need some flexibility on how we set those rates so that we’re not utilizing some of those dollars that are really needed to provide our base core services going for those special type activities so that’s really what we’re trying to do this evening with this resolution and getting that resolution of support from the cities. Mayor Ryan: Great, thank you Mr. Simich. Mr. McDonald, Councilman McDonald was there anything you’d like to add? Councilman McDonald: Well thank you Mayor. Yes I’ll add a few things to all of this. One of the things about Southwest that I think really affects our community is that it’s kind of the glue that holds all the communities together. Ourselves, Eden Prairie and Chaska. Without Southwest Transit it becomes very difficult for our residents to travel between those cities. There is no bus service between Chanhassen and Chaska or Chanhassen and Eden Prairie yet that’s where most the doctor’s offices are. Shopping is and what Southwest Transit does is it provides that service through it’s Prime service. Also now with the Prime MD we’ll be able to get people back and forth to their medical appointments so I would urge all of my fellow council members to support the resolution as I think this is really a vital service provided to the community and I’m just very gung ho on Southwest Transit so thank you. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 4 Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilman McDonald. Council any other questions for either Mr. Simich or I would stand, if not I would stand for a motion as well. Councilman McDonald: I’ll make a motion Madam Mayor. I would make the resolution that the City Council adopts a Resolution of Support for Southwest Transit. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Resolution #2019-59: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to adopt the Resolution of Support for Southwest Transit. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 5-0. And Mr. Simich if you want to, once as you shared with us in our work session the next steps for this resolution are what? Len Simich: Sure. I will be meeting with, as I mentioned all of our core cities that form Southwest Transit as well as some of our neighboring communities that do take advantage of the services we offer. That will all be packaged together and be part of our legislative initiative and we will actually be trying to introduce some legislation this year. We’re talking to some of the area legislators. In the Senate Senator Osmek has been one of our main leaders so that’s really our next step is trying to get some legislation drafted and this will like I said be the backbone of that legislation. Mayor Ryan: Perfect thank you and as Mr. Gerhardt mentioned in our work session we also put together a list of legislative priorities as a council and share that with our legislators and we will be adding this to the list as well to offer support. Len Simich: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Alright thank you. AVIENDA PRELIMINARY PLAT/GRADING PERMIT EXTENSION. Mayor Ryan: Alright perfect, going backwards now to Old Business. We have the Avienda preliminary plat and grading permit extension. Kate Aanenson: Alright thank you Mayor, members of the City Council. The action being requested tonight is to grant an extension of the preliminary plat and the grading permit and I’d just like to give a little bit of background on this because it’s been ongoing for a couple of years. So back in July of 2017 the City granted preliminary plat. Our city code allows a certain Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 5 timeframe that the final plat has to be executed so on June 25, 2018, within that one year period they did do a final plat and then they also wanted to do the grading. In looking at the grading they decided they probably wanted to do some changes and just wanted to move forward with the grading itself. So we asked that the City Council extinguish the final plat and just allow the preliminary plat to move forward with the, with an extension. So that was done and we gave them until the end of December this year so they would have to have that extended, the preliminary plat for another year and that would permit the grading permit with the conditions that were outlined in the previous. So the goal here then is that they would come back and they want to make some changes to the final plat and amend the PUD so the goal that we’ve outlined with them is that we would go back, meet with the City Council in a work session to kind of go top down. Get your approval on some of those changes. There’s a resident here from the neighborhood. They’re concerned that they want to make sure that they can see those changes so before we would have a public hearing which is required as a part of the PUD, that they would meet with the neighbors and then go through the process of a public hearing, the PUD and then the final plat for that phase but with the grading permit that allows them to do some work. They’ve got a number of months, the Level 7 team does to do the grading permit so it allows them to work and the best conditions which would be winter conditions with the poor soils. So the other thing with the grading permit approvals is one of the things that they have met these, they’ve already done some of the wetland banking and taking those credits out so they’ve done some of this. They’ve worked through the watershed district on the underground containment system. It’s very complex. The other thing that they will have to do is provide the outlot with the conservation easement on it and so that would be required. Then we also had that be staked so some of those items have been completed but some of them before they get notice to proceed they would have to demonstrate all those steps before they can get the notice to proceed for grading. So with that the staff is comfortable. There’s been a lot of work put into this including the Environment Assessment document. The AUAR which is almost you know a year process going through all of that so we feel that we, it makes sense for both parties. The City and the developer. Level 7 Development to extend it and as they stated in their letter that they’ll be meeting with the City and that they will hopefully be under grading this spring. So with that we are recommending approval of the extension with the conditions that are in the staff report. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Ms. Aanenson. Council any questions before we get an update from Mr. Nordland, are you prepared to give an update? Okay. Any questions of Ms. Aanenson? Alright Mr. Nordland are you, I think you know we’ll come back to some of the grading permit if there’s any further questions there but as we have communicated with you it’s the one frequently asked question at city events and emails that council gets is what’s going on with that site and so with the understanding that you’re looking for an extension for the grading permit if you could just give us a little update of where you are all at that would be great. So welcome. Thank you. Mark Nordland: Yeah no problem. Thanks for having us and thanks for the report. We do intend to start grading this spring. I know I sound a little bit like a broken record. Hearing you say it was 2017 I think when we got that first approval. I was shaking my head too. It’s a Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 6 complex project we’ve all been through a lot of work to get it to this point. The markets have been shifting on us as we know we’ve been putting this into place. As the retail market has changed and housing markets have changed and we’re continuing to try to iterate so that we build the right thing and we believe that we are close to having that laid out. There are going to be some changes that we’re going to propose back to the council in work session which includes some PUD amendments. They’re not, well I guess it’s yeah they…but we don’t believe they’re significant changes. It’s the same types of uses. It’s some configurations within the site and access that we’d like to propose but we do want to get going with grading as soon as possible. In order to, well I was going to say keep momentum but to get momentum back within the market place we need to start building that road and get the grading in place so. That’s where we are today. If we could get this extension I believe it will be our last and we’ll be underway here this year. Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you. Mark Nordland: Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Council any questions of Mr. Nordland? No? Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Okay as part of this, as I understand it you’re going to be coming back and talking to us about the final plat. The drawing that is in here in our packet, is that what’s changing or is this going to also be changing and basically everything on the inside is up for grabs at this point? Mark Nordland: Well we’re going to be back to you with what is substantially similar to this plan yes. Councilman McDonald: Okay so this is kind of the upgraded plan from what we saw before because yeah it was laid out a little bit differently. As far as the central I guess business district within this was before and so you’ll come back and explain what’s going on with the individual buildings and will you have maybe some idea as to what kind of retail is going to be coming into town at that point or? Mark Nordland: We will have, we’ll update you as best we can at that time about what we’ve got commitments for and then also what we’re trying to do. We can be completely forthright in what we’re trying to do. As far as commitments I can’t tell you exactly what we’ll have locked in but this, you’ll notice the big change that is in the plan in the packet is the collapsing of that corner of the ring road to make it more pedestrian friendly. To make it so that the uses that are outside the ring road aren’t as isolated from those that are inside the ring road. We had feedback from retailers and the housing developers as well that it felt too isolated for those that were out, you know coming into the inside of that with as many cars as will be probably coming to the project. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 7 Councilman McDonald: Okay well. Kate Aanenson: I think most of the square footage or the total number of housing units and the square footage is pretty similar. It’s just the, it’s what those end users are going to be and where they’re located but. Mark Nordland: So we’re looking at adjusting right now it’s shown angled. We’re potentially going to straighten that. I mean it’s not verbatim to this but it will be, it will be substantially similar to this. Councilman McDonald: Well yeah I notice there’s not as many big anchor stores as there were before but I look forward to you coming back and explaining how all of this is changing and how that’s going to make for a much better development and everything so yeah it has been a long time and we have gone through a number of different changes so I appreciate your patience and I hope you appreciate our’s by you know kind of hanging in there with you. Mark Nordland: We do and we don’t take it for granted. Councilman McDonald: Okay well thank you. Mark Nordland: Thank you. Councilman Campion: So sorry building off that. When is that that we will hear those updated? Mark Nordland: In the next couple of months. We’re working on some dates here after the new year. My guess is it’s February for a work session. Is that? Kate Aanenson: That’s kind of what we’re talking about. That we were going to try to meet in January and get a schedule put together for the council. For the neighbors. Planning Commission. Mark Nordland: Yeah and we do have the ability I believe to pull the grading permit with the preliminary plat to start some grading work out there which we’re really trying to get some of that as Ms. Aanenson mentioned the soil conditions, some of those areas are easier to do while it’s actually frozen which is not typical but in this case it is so we’d like to be able to get out there before the thaw to start some of that and then continue the grading and road work through the summer and hopefully into the fall and be done then. Mayor Ryan: And that actually leads to one of my questions. To feed off of that, how do you start grading if you don’t totally know what the final plat is going to look like? Mark Nordland: The approvals are based on the plan that had the complete ring road. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 8 Mayor Ryan: Right. Mark Nordland: And the grades aren’t substantially different from that and we would have some feedback from the work session hopefully that we’re not just totally going down the wrong path with the City. Obviously you will need to approve any changes from the approved plan that’s currently in place. Mayor Ryan: Right. Mark Nordland: So we understand that but if there’s general alignment that we’re heading down the correct path then at risk we would go ahead and start the mass grading for the site and especially the mucking out of some of the tougher soils during the wintertime and then while we’re going through the PUD amendment and the final plat. Mayor Ryan: And I’m sure it would have been highlighted in there that if you were going outside of what was initially approved. That we’re not going into any of the protected areas. The bluffs or the. Mark Nordland: No the condition, well you can. Kate Aanenson: I was going to say it’s a condition. We’ve had that discussion. The neighbors are concerned about it. So typically before they get a notice to proceed engineering and planning staff and the City Forester will actually walk the site and make sure it’s, the fence, snow fence is up and the like. I also want to touch too on the grading. Those are fixed points and they have been from the beginning where it’s going to tie into Bluff Creek Drive at both ends. It’s a fixed point so those elevations really haven’t changed at all and then also the touch down at Lyman Boulevard. From the very beginning all the environmental documents so it’s just some of that internal, and we’re not at that granular level. I think what we were trying to do and with the engineering was just making sure that the stormwater collection system and the sewer and water and I think we found another way not to have to continue the depth of that sewer as we’re looking at some of that so the grading overall at this level it should just match up fine. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council just to kind of maybe clarify some of Mark’s comments on the, it had a ring road that would go from Sunset all the way down to Bluff Creek Drive and then on the west side it went down to Bluff Creek Drive and what they’re thinking is the easterly part of that ring road would be eliminated to bring the development closer together so you didn’t have a public road separating the uses on the east side of the development so that would be a private drive in that area to bring those uses closer together instead of having a public roadway separating the development basically west of Powers to where the public street was going to be. That would be more of a private street that would go up to Sunset and so it wouldn’t separate those two uses. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 9 Councilman Campion: So does that translate to more parking stalls then or? Mark Nordland: No. It’s ironically, well I guess it’s not ironic. We’re dealing with the same basic footprint but the number of parking stalls, the number of square footage of buildings and types and number of housing units is almost identical. I don’t want to say it’s identical because there’s a couple but it’s substantially similar to what we had initially proposed. It really just has to do with the pedestrian access between those areas and really getting people from the housing to the retail and back and forth without feeling like, the last thing we want is somebody that lives here to feel like they need to jump in their car to go someplace else within the development. Unless they’re buying something very heavy but we want people to be able to, this to be a walk. I mean we understand that a lot of people will still take a car to get here but once they’re there we want them to be able to walk within the development. Mayor Ryan: Okay any further questions? No? Mark Nordland: Yeah we can get much deeper into it when we have the work session and I really appreciate your consideration. Thank you. Mayor Ryan: Alright, thank you for being here tonight. Mark Nordland: Thanks. Mayor Ryan: Council any further questions of Ms. Aanenson or a motion? Councilman Campion: I’ll make a motion. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Councilman Campion. Councilman Campion: It’s a long one. So I’ll move that the City Council approves extension of the preliminary plat until June 30, 2020 and permits grading as stated in the conditions listed below and in accordance with the preliminary plat approvals. Item 1. Approval of the stormwater permit by the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District. 2. Meet all requirements of the WCA approval. 3. Receive approval of the plan set for grading in stormwater by both the City and the RPBCWD. 4. Placement of Outlot A in a conservation easement. The City shall review the easement language. 5. Boundary of Outlot A shall be staked and inspected prior to grading. 6. Provide proof of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. And 7. Complete the withdrawal of banding credits form for the LGU review and signature. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Coleman: I’ll second that. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 10 Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded that the City Council approves extension of the preliminary plat until June 30, 2020 and permits grading as stated in the conditions listed below and in accordance with the preliminary plat approvals. 1. Approval of the Stormwater Permit by the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD). 2. Meet all requirements of the WCA approval. 3. Receive approval of the plan set for grading an stormwater by both the City and the RPBCWD. 4. Placement of Outlot A in a Conservation Easement. The City shall review the easement language. 5. Boundary of Outlot A shall be staked and inspected prior to grading. 6. Provide proof of withdrawal of the wetland banking credits from the banks once the withdrawal is completed. 7. Complete the Withdrawal of Banking Credits form for LGU review and signature. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 5-0. AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE CHAPTER 4, FEES. Mayor Ryan: Alright back to New Business. Number 2, let me pull that up real quickly. This is for amendment to city code Chapter 4, Fees. Mr. Sticha this is you? Greg Sticha: Yep. Good evening Mayor and council. On an annual basis city staff reviews Chapter 4 of city code which does, is about fees for the City that they charge for various items that the City, the most significant of which that is reviewed on an annual basis is the City’s utility fees of it’s water, sewer and surface water funds. There is one additional proposed amendment in this year’s Chapter 4 amended ordinance in front of you and Ms. Aanenson may comment on that briefly but before we get to that I’m going to go over kind of the process that we took or went through to come to this evening and having the revised fees for our utility funds in front of you. The process started early in the year with staff reviewing all of it’s utility expected infrastructure and other costs. Earlier this year than anticipated we attempted to have City Council have the report from Ehlers back to it by September. We were trying to accommodate Ms. Coleman in her eventual happy baby that we got to see this evening so. We Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 11 were able to do so on September 23rd the City Council reviewed the rate study with Ehlers and staff. Part of that rate study was to look at not only the connection fees as well as the operating rates. Based on one change from the previous year there are additional construction capital costs that are included as part of this year’s rate study that is related to the additional street improvements that are now planned for the city going forward. Those additional costs were incorporated into the rate study and we were able to keep the rate increases consistent with the previous year’s rate study. Some of that had to do with additional bonding that we will do for some of those larger projects that are related to those street projects. But we were able to keep the final increases consistent with the prior year’s rate study. I’m going to just go over a couple highlights in the executive summary with council. This first graph shows our current rates of our water, sewer, and stormwater bill as it compares to our KFS cities. We are right on average, you can see the blue or purple line is average for our KFS cities and we are the far bar on the left. With the average being just under $225 a quarter, Chanhassen is as well just under $225 a quarter so from a comparison to our KFS cities our quarterly operating bills for our residents are very close to average. Even with the 5 percent increase that we’re proposing for 2020 we will be still very close to average with the same cities being slightly higher than us and other cities being lower than us. Councilmember Coleman has asked me a question about their proposed rates for 2020. We do not have that information at this point in time. I can tell you that all of our KFS cities and the majority of our neighboring cities do plan for rate increases on an annual basis so they will be increasing their rates by some percentage. What percentage they’re probably setting those within the next couple weeks as well. I can’t tell you that answer but all of our KFS cities except one, which does not typically set rate increases as part of an annual process and that’s Lino Lakes and you can see that they’re out layer in this graph. All the other cities do set rate increases each year at this time of the year. Taking a look at how we compare to our neighboring cities on our stormwater, or our water, sewer and stormwater bills. Again very close to average. Slightly below average and with the proposed 2020 rate increases we will be very close to slightly below the average as well for 2020. From a standpoint of the fees that are in the ordinance, all of the rates that are incorporated, I’m going to get to the executive summary page. Are based on what you see on the screen now. 5 percent increases to our water, sewer and stormwater utility fees. A 3 ½ percent increase to the water hook-up fee. No change to the sewer hook-up fee and a 2 percent increase to the stormwater area charge. All the fees within the ordinance that are crossed out are based on these percentages you see right here on the screen in front of you. That’s all of the comments I have about the city’s utility fees as well as the rate study that was gone through with the City Council earlier this year. If you have any other questions of me certainly you can ask those. Otherwise Ms. Aanenson can answer any questions you might have about Section 15. 4-30-15 which relates to wetland boundary and alteration permits. Mayor Ryan: Council any questions of Mr. Sticha? I just I have one before I turn it over to you Ms. Aanenson. And I’m sorry I didn’t prep you for this in advance but one of our KFS strategies this year, or initiatives this year was to do an analysis of our, the SAC and WAC charges for you know, for new businesses or people wanting to come to the city and you did an analysis on, and we as a council discussed whether or not we should increase those or decrease those. I’m Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 12 wondering if you can just provide a quick summary of what those are. Why they are set the way and a little bit of history on how that was, or how and why that was established. Greg Sticha: Sure. The most significant expense and debt payment that the City has is it’s two water treatment plants totaling almost $40 million dollars. The first of which was built in 2006. At that point in time when the rate study was done the City Council looked at how that debt should be paid for. The analysis that was done was at approximately that point in time about half the city was built out and half was not. The theory being that then half of the debt payment for that treatment plant should be paid for by operating rates. What you pay your quarterly water bill for and then half should be paid for by hook-up’s and connections. Those that are now entering the system later on. That was, that analysis seemed very sound at the time and I think there was good rationalization behind that analysis. With the second water treatment plant being added last year there’s additional debt now and so as that additional debt has come on one of the discussions that council wanted to at least consider was perhaps shifting that analysis. We reviewed that as a possibility with council in September. I think the consensus of that discussion was to not change the formula. To not change the 50/50 split on the repayment of that debt. But I also think council still has some unanswered questions and still wants to look at potential ways to make our connection and hook-up fees somewhat more affordable in some instances. So I don’t know that we have a complete consensus on that portion but I do think the discussion was that at this point in time there was not a need to change that 50/50 split. Mayor Ryan: Right because otherwise if the burden shifted the analysis if the burden shifted back to the residents then the increase would be quite a bit more. I mean it’d be much more substantial. Greg Sticha: That is correct. You’d be increasing your rates much more than 5 percent. Mayor Ryan: Right, okay. I just wanted to clarify because that was one of our initiatives for this year so I wanted, go ahead Councilwoman Coleman. Councilwoman Coleman: Thank you. Mr. Sticha I was reading in the study it says that the Metropolitan Council regarding the sewer rates, they will be increasing what they charge us for 2020. Is that? Greg Sticha: That is correct. Councilwoman Coleman: What options does the City have when they tell us that these rate increases are coming? Do we have any bargaining ability here? Do we have any ability to say no, come back to the negotiating table? Greg Sticha: The simple answer is no. They’re based on metered rates from the previous year so they actually have meters placed around the city and it’s based on the metered flow at each of those meters around the city. The previous years flow, flow meters were significantly higher Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 13 than the previous year. Therefore based on the entire flow across the entire Twin Cities is how they base their calculations so it’s very formula driven process that they go through in setting the rates for each community in the entire Twin Cities. Our flow increased by a little bit more than most communities. Therefore we’re paying a little bit more. Some of the things that we can do and we have done and we’re still doing is trying to make sure we find and spend any money on the capital side to shore up any infrastructure leaks that we have. I and I that we call it and we have invested a significant amount of capital dollars to do so and I think we’re addressing many of those issues. One project this year we’re taking a look at through the Galpin property that I know we’re addressing some potential I and I issues so the only real way to lower our flows is to shore up any leaks we might have in the system which we are doing but in terms of saying we don’t think that’s fair we can certainly attend the public meetings that they have in regards to those but they are based on actual metered flows so it’d be somewhat difficult to argue that our share of the total pie is unjust because based on those flows it would indicate that we should be paying more. Councilwoman Coleman: Thank you. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council I’d like to add to those comments. When our flows do go higher we do get somewhat of a rebate program for the amount that we do invest in our I and I program so they do give us credit for that and in January we were hoping to have it on for tonight but the report that SEH is putting together a list of recommendations to council to solve I and I issues and prioritizing where we should emphasize our initiatives. We felt that the report still needed to give a little more detail regarding those recommendations and so we’re planning on bringing that back in January. It just wasn’t to the standard that we thought was able to explain the different scenarios to the City Council. So they’re going to make some modifications to that report and bring it back in January so from that then the council can pick and choose which I and I approaches you want to take to lessen those additional flows and you know it’s not just from infiltration into our sanitary sewer lines. In some cases it’s individual homes where sump pumps are discharging storm water into basins. Some basement sinks. Or rain gutters directly being discharged into sanitary sewer lines and so there’s a variety of issues that they’re laying out and approaches to correct those situations and we felt as though they needed to get into more detail to explain what options they are for you. Is it at a point of sale? Is it going to be a mass investigation throughout the community? So we want to make sure that you have every option before you to address those potential solutions. Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you. Any further questions? Alright Ms. Aanenson. Thank you Mr. Sticha. Kate Aanenson: So Mayor and council, the wetland boundary and type delineation. Right now the City does have a fee for wetland alteration permits. We’ve had that for a long, long time but as every project that comes in they also have to do a boundary assessment and we do not have an established fee for that so in the staff report you can see some of the fees that individuals are paying to have that, or we’re paying a consultant to have that done so we are recommending a Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 14 boundary type determination. For example on the Park project we probably walked that project 3 or 4 times looking at all those wetlands. Some wetlands are missed because we also have to verify that. That’s on every project. If we’re looking at the areas, if there’s a wetland out there they have to, before they can subdivide go through that process. Whether they’re altering it or not they would get charged for that but just delineating that and that type and determination because that affects what ones they could mitigate potentially or alter so what this, in the fee schedule again it’s a, create a fee for the boundary and type determination. Again that’s an analysis that the staff has to do as the LGU and all the required publications and the like so that’s what that covers so we are recommending a fee change on that and then also we do require that all wetland boundaries be staked and signed and so we’re establishing that fee. It says per sign but we’re clarifying that there is a fee for those too. Typically those would just show up in a development contract. Mayor Ryan: Any, I have, this one just threw me because we haven’t really discussed this as a council and we’ve, you know we’ve gone through the utility rate studies a couple times and had a chance to ask Mr. Sticha about it and go through it. This one I just, I guess I’m a little stuck on how this came about and then, and then we say that it’s consistent with other communities but we don’t know what those communities are and $500 is you know, is a pretty significant expense. I guess my question to you is, right now when we pay a consultant, are none of those fees passed onto the developer? This is just kind of out of left field for me. Kate Aanenson: No. Unless they’re part of a development contract. So if you were to go for a wetland alteration permit or conditional use we charge a fee for that process. It covers the publication process. Administration of that so we have a number of different types of applications. A grading permit. Like I say conditional use site plan. But we do, we have one for a wetland alteration permit but the nomenclature is set that we don’t say where, we don’t require one for a boundary type determination. Todd Gerhardt: So Kate the way I understand that is if somebody was coming in with a single family home and building on a lot, an existing lot that isn’t going through the platting process or the subdivision process, we can’t make it a condition and what this does it gives us the option for them to tell us what that boundary and type of determination is. When we go through the subdivision process Roger will tell you that opens up the gate for the City to allow us to make numerous requests of the developer and a boundary or type of determination is where it is not a part of the subdivision process where we open up those rules to classify what type of wetland exists on your property. Am I correct Kate? Kate Aanenson: Yes and, but right now if they’re subdividing like I’ll take the Park property. There’s 160 acres and so there was a lot of wetlands out there so we walked it 3 or 4 times. We didn’t charge them for that. Yes they paid for their own report but we still had to do all the paperwork and process. So go out in the field. Field checked everything and like I said we were out there several times so that’s our cost of processing that application just like every other application and again because we do have an application we’ve had for 20 plus years for a Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 15 wetland alteration permit, because the, it doesn’t say alteration permit or delineation type. We’re just trying to make sure it’s clear that we do charge a fee for that. Mayor Ryan: But it’s a new fee. Kate Aanenson: It’s a new fee correct. Mayor Ryan: Councilman Campion. Councilman Campion: Mayor, so wouldn’t that be a pretty variable expense I mean based on the size of the project? And $500 sounds like a big fee. Kate Aanenson: Well but if it’s in with the wetland alteration permit, I mean you could have a wetland alteration permit for .03 of an acre or you have a wetland alteration permit for another one. It’s processing the application. There’s not a nexus between the number. Councilman Campion: But as you go through you know just the list that’s provided in the staff report. You know there’s a, b, c, d right? So there’s the alteration permit, single family residence. Alteration permit all other uses. Boundary and type determination. Is it, it’s all the above or it’s, to me it looks like the boundary and type determination would be required for any subdivision. Kate Aanenson: Yes whether it be an industrial park or a wetlands on there yes. Councilman Campion: Whereas the other sub-permits like the alteration would only be if you’re altering right? Kate Aanenson: Correct. That’s the only time we would collect a fee. Councilman Campion: So this seems like a big deal in that it’s now any subdivision is having this $500 permit added right? Kate Aanenson: If they have to do a wetland delineation. If there’s wetlands on the property. Todd Gerhardt: Well it was my understanding that we could make that a requirement without having that in the code. Kate Aanenson: New wetland delineation? Yeah, correct. Correct. Todd Gerhardt: And also get reimbursed for our time verifying that their alteration permit is correct. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 16 Kate Aanenson: You’d have to ask, I’m not sure what the mechanism is on that. That’s engineering usually doe that part of it so I don’t know. Todd Gerhardt: Well the City Attorney’s telling me yes. Kate Aanenson: Okay, okay. Todd Gerhardt: And you know I could see this if it’s a lot of record somewhere where they’re not subdividing. Let’s use Ann Nye’s as an example. She has like two different types of wetlands on her property and say she doesn’t subdivide and she wants to remodel her house or do something but we want to know how close it is to those wetlands. So I could see this playing a factor in that type of situation. That we get reimbursed for our time and going out there and verifying what she’s provided to us is correct or if we have to do it. Mayor Ryan: But I, I just think that there needs to be more conversation around you know adding a $500 fee like we do when we’re changing a city code. We have a work session on it. When we have our utility rate increase we have a conversation. Whenever we’re talking about significant changes in fees we have an opportunity to discuss it as council in a work session and ask those questions and get some feedback and there still seems to be even a disconnect tonight among staff a little bit so, and I look for council direction on whether or not you want to move forward with this or if council would be comfortable moving forward with some of the other fee suggestions and study, you know utility rate study but hold this amended section back and bring it to an early work session the beginning of the year. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah I mean I’m not trying to push this through. I’m just giving you a couple of different examples. I want to talk about it at a work session so you feel comfortable with it. It is something new. I think Kate gave a good example. I gave a good example and I don’t think either one of us are disagreeing. You know with a plat we typically ask them to provide a wetland delineation or a determination of the type. But then we go out and determine the size. Measure it and we never get reimbursed but we can make that a condition of the plat without a condition of the plat we would not be able to get reimbursed for our costs if somebody was to put an expansion onto a house and you have to have a certain distance from a wetland so, and then we’d have to go out and verify and then the subdivision rules don’t apply in that situation. But we want to make sure that you feel comfortable with this so we would want you to move ahead with the wetlands but table item C for us to give you some clarification and examples of where situations like this could exist. Mayor Ryan: And again that’s just where I’m coming from because I feel like I don’t have a clear enough understanding of the application of it. I hear a lot of times about you know our fees and we continue to add fees or increase fees and now we’re adding a $500 fee and I’m just not comfortable with the application and so I’m personally not ready to move forward with that but obviously I’d defer to the rest of council on that. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 17 Councilman Campion: I like the idea of tabling that item and when it does come back just to understand what percentage of subdivisions or you know what would this apply to. Is it 80 percent of them have a wetland that would require this or is it even, is it higher or lower than that? Todd Gerhardt: Well it’s, right now we’re seeing a lot of infill type developments and I forget the number of wetlands. We have a variety of different types of wetlands in the community and based on the types, the setbacks are different and so I would feel more comfortable recommending tabling C and having staff come back with you and explain the different options of how it would relate in a platting situation and how we could handle that and then a non- platting situation how we would handle it in that situation. Mayor Ryan: That would be helpful. Council? Todd Gerhardt: Kate do you disagree? Kate Aanenson: No I think that’s great. Todd Gerhardt: Okay. Kate Aanenson: I think it’d be nice to have someone from engineering too because this is really their issue too to help on that. Todd Gerhardt: Yes. And not having a Water Resources Coordinator on staff the last 6 months has been a challenge for all of us so. Mayor Ryan: Right I understand and in no way is it a suggestion that it’s not needed. It’s just I don’t clearly. Kate Aanenson: Yeah I think we should be clear on it, yep. Mayor Ryan: Understanding yeah. Okay. Todd Gerhardt: And it’s you know right now we’re not going, nothing’s going to, the development part of the business right now is just kind of at a standstill as we’re into the non- construction season other than the ones that have foundations in so. So this is perfect timing. Mayor Ryan: Alright. Any other thoughts, questions for Ms. Aanenson or Mr. Sticha or is there a motion? And as part of the motion do we just. Todd Gerhardt: Not to include 15C at this time. Mayor Ryan: Okay. Okay. So if anyone is ready to make a motion? Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 18 Councilman Campion: I will make a motion unless there are other comments. Okay. I propose that the City Council adopts an ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for 2020, not to include item 15C for boundary and type determination. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Ordinance 652: Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the City Council adopts an ordinance amending Chapter 4 of the Chanhassen City Code revising the fees for 2020, not to include 15C for Wetland Boundary and Type Determination fee. All voted in favor, except for Councilwoman Coleman who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. ADOPT FINAL LEVY AND 2020 BUDGET AND 2020-2024 CIP. Mayor Ryan: Alright. Next we have the adoption of the final levy and 2020 budget and 2020 through 2024 CIP. Mr. Sticha. Greg Sticha: Good evening again mayor and council. This being the last meeting of the year the council’s tasked with passing a levy for taxes payable in 2020. A total general fund and special revenue fund budgeted expenditures as well as the passing of a 2020 to 2024 CIP as you mentioned. I’m going to go through a power point that goes through the levy and budget portion of this. At the end I’ll also leave room for comment about the CIP but I’m going to start by just going through the attached power point within your packet. The budget process for those that aren’t aware, we get started relatively early in the year and I should also maybe even add a bullet point. Typically in February we kind of have a pre-discussion of the upcoming year’s budget with council kind of setting some of the early, early numbers that we’re aware of so in theory I guess you could say we even start this discussion as early as February of the year but our first discussion with council is typically in June or July. The department heads submit their budgets to the City Manager and myself. At that point in time we review those budgets and then present a detailed budget to the City Council in August of each year. In September of each year the City Council adopts a preliminary levy. That preliminary levy is used for the Truth in Taxation statements that are mailed to all residents and businesses in the city. That was done on September 23rd this year. That preliminary levy is a not to exceed number when setting the final levy so when those statement notices go out that is the largest number that the City can set for a final levy. They can only lower that number when they set the levy this evening. A public budget meeting or the Truth in Taxation hearing is held the first Monday at the City. It was December 2nd, last Monday and then this evening the City Council will adopt the budget levy and CIP. So before I get into the details, some of the more details of the budget and forgive me council and staff who have seen this presentation multiple times in the last few months but for those of you at home that have not, the first thing I want to kind of do is compare the 2009 Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 19 budget versus the 2019 budget and show some of the changes that have taken place over that 11 years. Total general fund spending has increased relatively I would call this a small increases per year on average. If you take a look at some of the actual numbers that we’re looking, $1.894 million over 11 years or annual increase in spending of 1.7 percent. When you further look at that $1.894 million into even more detail, 1.68 of the $1.894 is for wages, health care increases, taxes, pension costs and some increased added seasonal funding and part time hours that we’ve added over that time. Interesting to note that we have the exact same FTE count in 2019 as we had in 2009. $431,000 of that $1.894 was for increases in the policing services contract. An additional $51,000 for the assessing services contract with the County. When you add those numbers up it’s larger than $1,894,200. So that means all other line items in the city’s general fund budget actually has decreased over the last 11 years by nearly $270,000. An interesting side note on the wage. Wages and the health care costs. If you take the $1,680,000 divide it by 11 years you’re spending about 2.8 percent increase in wages increases, health care, taxes and pension cost increase. If you think about it just the increases each year and what it costs to provide health care, which in a lot of years is double digit increases to keep our spending on that particular line item at 2.8 percent per year I think is relatively impressive. So now let’s talk about 2020. The first slide shows the general department area and the increases by those for 2020 as compared to the 2019 final budget. A total increase of 4.4 percent in general fund spending. The 3 areas of significant note are law enforcement and as the council is aware and staff is aware, there are additional services added within this proposed budget one of which is added duty crews at the fire department so that accounts for the largest increase within that department area. The public works area includes an additional employee for the street department and the park and rec area includes an additional employee for the park maintenance department. So those increases are accounted for within those department areas and was of much discussion of the City Council from September 23rd until this evening. On the revenue side not a lot of significant changes. Obviously we’re presenting a balanced budget so the revenues increased by exactly 4.4 percent. Some minor adjustments into some miscellaneous income and charges for service line items and some additional grant dollars as well as we had some additional tower rental revenue that came in. The majority of the other line items stayed flat. In particular the item of note would be license and permits. We did not increase the license and permit line item budget for 2020 even though typically the actual revenues do exceed the one million 35 that you see on line 2 on an annual basis. So what are the factors that are impacting the 2020 budget? Some of them I’ve already talked about. New growth in Chanhassen for 2020 was 1.61 percent meaning the first $177,000 in levy increases are offset by those new homes in Chanhassen so if you were to increase the levy by only 1.61 percent the average home would not be impacted by a levy increase of $177,100. We had a 16 percent reduction in our health care contract which most certainly was beneficial to this year’s budget setting process. As I mentioned the building permit revenue budgeted the same as the previous year. We did include a 3 percent increase for cost of living and merit pay for employees within this budget. A 5 percent increase is included for the policing services contract. The average home in Chanhassen increased in taxable market value by 5 percent and that become important when we talk a little later about the impact of this levy on a number of valued homes in one of my future, next slides coming down the line here. Some of the increased service levels or Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 20 additional services that were added as part of this budget process includes the expansion of duty crew for a cost to the general fund of about $150,000. A new street maintenance department employee and a new park maintenance department employee costing about $80,000 each including all benefits and taxes etcetera. And then also included as part of this year’s preliminary levy and as a part of staff recommended final budget is an increase in the levy of $350,000 for the pavement management program funding. The City Council and the community I think in general is probably pretty aware of the council’s long discussion about how to fund it’s share of the road improvement projects that are needed within the city of Chanhassen. It’s been something that the City Council has been discussing for a couple of years. In October the City Council did implement a franchise fee on it’s gas and electric utility bills that is going to help fund that. This $350,000 would also be a portion of the funding that would get us to $3.6 million per year in total road construction funding dollars. This again is paying for the City’s share of that $3.6 million. So as it breaks down by levy type, the debt levies stay relatively flat as compared to the previous years you’ll note. The increase in the total levy is at 6.5 percent. The $350,000 for the pavement management funding I was just discussing is within this line item right here. And then the other two line items are flat within the operational levies. The general fund levy is an increase of just over $300,000. So as you take a look at our levy compared to new growth, and taking a look at previous levies. What you see on this graph is a preliminary levy that was set significantly higher than new growth. The last several levies have been set at new growth. The additional services that were included in this year’s budget are the explanation for the 6.5 percent increase. Again those items are the additional funding for streets, the 2 additional employees and the expanded duty crew for the fire department. So with that 6 ½ percent increase in the levy, how does that impact various homes in the city of Chanhassen and these are actual Truth in Taxation statements that I took a look at on the County’s website to see about the impact on the average homes and some of the various dollar valued homes within the city of Chanhassen. Keeping in mind that as I noted earlier the average increased in value, taxable market value by 5 percent so I tried to find statements that where the taxable market value increased by 5 percent. If your home increased significantly in value by more than that you will see larger dollar increases in the city portion of your bill. If your home increased significantly less than that 5 percent you’ll see lower than what you see on the screen in terms of dollar changes in your city portion of your property tax bill. So I tried to find Truth in Taxation statements that were close to that 5 percent average. One item you’ll note is as most people are probably aware the property tax system in the state of Minnesota is a progressive tax base so as your taxable market value increases the more you pay towards the total portion of the tax levy. So taking a look at parcel number 3 which is probably the closest to the average home in Chanhassen which is valued at about $430,000, that particular parcel saw a 5.8 percent increase in it’s taxable market value and it resulted in a $49 increase in it’s City portion of it’s property taxes. That’s about what I had projected the council back when we set the preliminary levy in September. That home did see a slightly larger increase than the average being at 5 percent. This one saw 5.8 percent increase in it’s taxable market value and I think I had projected about a $45 increase on the average home so pretty close to those projections that we had made back in September. Obviously as your home value increases the dollar amount changed to any of the line items on your property tax bill will also change and so that’s why you see the larger value Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 21 parcels with significantly higher dollar amounts paid on it’s city portion of it’s property taxes. Had the City Council issued a levy of new growth only the increase or the change in particular into parcel 3 in this instance would have been very close to zero but the City Council did want to, at least as part of the preliminary budget process and a review of those additional services they wanted to have throughout this fall included that as part of the preliminary budget and staff is recommending a final budget that mirrors what the City Council set for a preliminary budget back on September 23rd. How does the pie divide up? So when a property tax payer gets his property tax bill it’s obviously not just the City of Chanhassen that they’re paying their property tax bill for. It’s the City, County and school district. The City of Chanhassen makes up about 21 cents on every dollar. This is based on an actual Truth in Taxation statement right here, these figures and that’s in School District 112. So 20 to 22 cents is what the average home pays towards their total tax dollar for all of their services that they’re provided within the city. Annually we also review a number of comparisons to our KFS and some of our neighboring cities in Carver County. This particular slide shows the budgeted expenditures, general fund budgeted expenditures per the Office of State Auditor’s office. Of all of our KFS cities with the average for 2019, obviously we do not have the budgeted 2020 expenditures for our KFS cities. They’re adopting their budgets this evening or sometime this week or next week. The average increase of our KFS for 2019 was 4.8 percent. Chanhassen’s was 1.8 percent. If the council does go ahead and set a final levy that mirrors the preliminary levy that will be one of the few years where we aren’t among the lowest on this screen. The percentage increase will be higher than the 1.8 percent but as a comparison to KFS cities I’m also going to get into per capita spending. So taking a breakdown of that previous slide and breaking it out by population, number of people served within each of those jurisdictions the average per capita spending of our KFS is $609. Chanhassen being at $447. Significantly lower than almost all of the other communities in our KFS aside from Lino Lakes who is just slightly higher than us. Taking a look at our tax rates in Carver County. These are based on, the middle column is based on what actually was set for tax rates for tax levies in 2019. The right column is based on the preliminary levy that was set by each of the jurisdictions within Carver County. City of Chanhassen has the lowest tax rate in Carver County with the average being 58. Even with the larger than normal increase in the preliminary levy the City’s tax rate will not increase by much. .03 is the amount that the City’s tax rate will increase. The tax rate will still be by far the lowest within Carver County and then as a matter of fact if you take a look at the tax rate, the City of Chanhassen’s tax rate compared to a number of jurisdictions in Hennepin County, again the City of Chanhassen is among the lowest in the entire Twin Cities. I estimate that the Chanhassen tax rate, city tax rate is probably in the top less than one percent of all tax rates in the entire Twin Cities in terms of total tax rate. So before I get into the recommendation I also want to devote a small amount of time for discussion on the CIP for 2020 to 202the City’s tax rate will not increase by much. .03 is the amount that the City’s tax rate will increase. The tax rate will still be by far the lowest within Carver County and then as a matter of fact if you take a look at the tax rate, the City of Chanhassen’s tax rate compared to a number of jurisdictions in Hennepin County, again the City of Chanhassen is among the lowest in the entire Twin Cities. I estimate that the Chanhassen tax rate, city tax rate is probably in the top less than one percent of all tax rates in the entire Twin Cities in terms of total tax rate. So before I get into the recommendation I also want to devote a Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 22 small amount of time for discussion on the CIP for 2020 to 2024. For those that are not aware the CIP document is a fiscal planning document. The document does not mean that all of the items that are slated for purchase in the upcoming year that they automatically will be purchased. Any item in that document that is over $20,000 will come back to City Council again for final approval. The document that you’re approving for $106 million, the majority of which are road projects of which again the majority of which are funded State and other contributions from other agencies so when you see the $107 million dollars you think wow. That’s a lot of capital cost for the city of Chanhassen over 5 years. The majority of that is not actual dollars of the City of Chanhassen. And as I said all of the items in 2020 will come back to City Council for final approval that are over $20,000. We did review the CIP document with the City Council back on September 23rd as well but if there are any additional questions about that. There were only some minor changes since that review in September. A couple of the road projects. The timing of them and the dollar amounts changed relatively insignificantly for example the Galpin project was pushed back one year. Some of the funding for some of the other road projects were changed very insignificantly so there were no significant changes from what you saw in September. The majority of the CIP sheets are identical to what you saw previously. With that I’ll take any questions about any of the slides in my power point. Any questions about the budget. Any questions about any of the levies that are presented in front of you as well as any questions about the CIP. Mayor Ryan: Perfect, thank you Mr. Sticha. Before we start discussing this as a council are there any specific questions for Mr. Sticha and the information that was presented tonight? No. Alright so I’d like to tackle this a little bit differently. And the reason for that is, as Mr. Sticha pointed out in years past we had, I mean 15 years past we have always, or the budget has always been approved based on matching new growth and this year we, by setting the preliminary levy higher than or above new growth there were added services that are up for consideration and I think it’s important that we as a council are discussing these, you know these different areas of added service as part of the discussion because again this is something new for the City and although nobody came forward at the Truth in Taxation, you know this is a big deal to be increasing the levy above new growth and so Mr. Sticha put in his over or general summary or background the budget includes and then there’s a list of different items. Oh you’re so good, thank you. A list of items that are the factors for why this budget is changing for 2020 and so as you go down that list I think it’s important for us to talk about what those, what those additions are and I would be interested to get feedback from council in your, you know either your agreement or something that you can’t support as it relates to the expansion of services because there’s a lot on there and I think it’s important for us to really discuss each one and just to give an example I will go first just so you kind of get an understanding of what I’m talking about when I go through this. So obviously I’m supportive of the matching new growth and then you go down and you know the 16 percent reduction in health care costs is significant for the City and I know it’s not something that we expect again next year but had a positive impact on our budget. And we’re keeping building permit revenue the same. The 3 percent increase of cost of living and merit pay is something that I support for our employees. The 5 percent increase in the police services contract. I think we as a city are you know definitely benefit from being able to Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 23 contract our policing services through the County and as their needs increase obviously the contract that we have with them is going to increase so I support that. Chief has spent a lot of time discussing with us this past year the need for the expansion of duty crews and that obviously is one of the more significant budget increases for this coming year but I think you’ve done, Chief you’ve done a great job in explaining the need and how that’s going to improve the services and there’s been a significant increase in our calls for service and so to continue to be able to recruit and support the needs of our residents I appreciate your input and trust that that’s the right direction for the City so I do support the expansion of the duty crew for the additional $150,000. I’m going to lump the two together, the street maintenance department employee and the pavement management program funding. As we all know over the last few, couple years but specifically this last year we’ve talked a lot about the growing need for us to address our infrastructure issues and concerns on the city. We have a number of roads coming due. We need to double the miles of roads that we either are doing reconstruction or mill and overlay and through that conversation in the last month we implemented a franchise fee and that was something that I supported even though the year prior I had not. I thought we did, staff did an excellent job explaining the reasoning behind this growing need for us and through that conversation of franchise fee and the additional funding needs I had conversations with not only staff but folks in the street department and they had talked about that they are short. They hadn’t had an additional employee in 20 years and with the new expectation of doubling the miles of roads they are going to need an additional employee and that was something that came from you know really the boots on the ground and so that was something that as part of the overall franchise fee infrastructure it was something that I supported and brought forward to staff about you know is it the time to increase an employee or additional full time employee in the street maintenance department and so I agree with that and can get behind that. As part of our franchise fee conversation we talked about and had a lot of folks give us feedback on whether or not they thought a franchise fee was fair and some people didn’t believe a franchise fee was fair because one, it is a regressive tax and two, they believe that the City should just be up front and levy for what, you know what projects we’re going to do and it was my belief that we, in order to be able to reach that $3.6 million dollars and for the City’s portion by doing a little bit of both was the best way to really figure out that delta and so that’s why I’m supportive of obviously was supportive of the franchise fee but in order for us to get to that $3.6 million dollars I support the $350,000 an increase of that levy to make sure that we are able to perform and with the additional employee but then also have the dollars to make sure that we’re getting the roads done that we have laid out or outlined for the years to come. The one area that I, I am not in support of for this year is the park maintenance department employee for $80,000 and the reason why I go back and forth on this but ultimately decided with not being in support of it is, as it did come up late and even though we talked about it maybe starting in February and then again in June and July this was never brought forward and it was added towards the end of the year when we were talking about adding additional staff and while I do believe there is a need. I do recognize the amount of work that goes into maintaining the number of our parks. The reason why I supported a street maintenance department is because that was part of our bigger project of franchise fee and doubling the roads. I know we have a lot of conversations coming forward in terms of what we’re going to do with Lake Ann Park and we continue, the City continues to grow. We have Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 24 more miles of trails and parks to maintain but I thought that came a little bit after the fact in terms of that need and so that is one area that I would like to see a reduction in the final levy is a reduction of the $80,000 dollars. So that’s really where I’m coming from in terms of looking at the overall budget change for 2020 is I support all of those bullets that you have presented tonight Mr. Sticha but the one area that I would like to see changed is the reduction of $80,000 for the park maintenance department employee. So that’s really what I’m thinking. If anyone wants to go through it in as detailed as that you’re more than welcome but I open it up for discussion for council. Councilwoman Coleman: Thank you for your comments. I understand the importance of taking care of city needs and appreciate that no proposals before us this evening are frivolous or wasteful. However I also understand the importance of prioritizing and sometimes having to temporarily go without. I’ve been amazed at the work of Mr. Sticha and city staff for addressing the budget issues that have come before us and have no doubt they can continue to use creativity, frugality and critical problem solving to help us continue navigating our city’s finances. I was recently at the senior center holiday luncheon and had the pleasure of speaking to a couple of seniors living on fixed incomes who are concerned about the impact that the franchise fees will have on their budgets. I do not feel right at this time about taking even more money out of their pockets or out of the pockets of lower income family all in the same year in addition to that. Just as Chanhassen residents have to learn what to do without every time government takes more money out of their budget I believe we too must do our best to tighten our belts and prioritize the most important needs before us which is why I support the expanded duty crew for the fire department as well as an increase in spending for law enforcement. Public safety is and always will be my number one priority. I would like however to see more proposals for where we can be resourceful and creative in saving in other departments or for not to reduce costs for requests for additional positions and spending and because of these reasons I do not support any other expenses that will increase the levy this year. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilwoman. Any other comments tonight? Councilman McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I’ll make a comment. Yeah this is a change in the budgets for the way we’ve done things in the past and I think for the first time what we’re having to face is that new growth just does not meet the needs of the city. I understand the whole thing about we’re taking money out of people’s pockets but then by the same turn people are asking us to increase our services. One of the big examples was the problems we have with potholes this year. Everybody complained about it. They wanted them fixed. That’s a service we have to perform and what we determined in that is that we probably don’t have enough people in the street department to really handle a crisis such as that plus do the normal maintenance that’s required of our streets during the short period in the summer. The health care reduction was a pleasant surprise because normally it doesn’t go in our favor. It goes the other way so I’m glad to see that. The 3 percent increase and a cost of living and merit pay, I think that as council has said staff does a marvelous job of trying to think outside the box and to meet the requirements that Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 25 council puts on them. I’ve never heard them actually give up and say well good luck. They always go back and they re-sharpen their pencils and they come up with something. I think the 3 percent is well earned and it’s also, and it’s deserved so I definitely would support an increase in pay. The police services I think goes without saying. We have one of the safest communities around and again we don’t have our own home grown police force so I think the sheriff’s department does an excellent job in that. That saves us a lot of money and infrastructure for a police department if we were to put one together. Then the budget would go up by millions of dollars so I think that that’s a great service and we’re getting our money’s worth. The rest of it then we get into a little bit of a, maybe I’m going to differ from the mayor somewhat but I think the duty crew, what I look at there, I’ve been following this for quite a few years and I’ve asked a lot of questions of the Chief because one of the things that’s always stood out to me is we’re not really putting out fires. Yes we do have fires on occasion and the fire department responds quite admirably to all of that and they do a great job in putting out fires. But where the increase in services has really come has been health and medical calls. Now you could argue that maybe that’s not the job of the fire department. Again you could go back and say well they should be putting out fires. However there’s no one else to step up and do that job and I’m sure that if it’s your loved one that’s suffering from a heart attack or a stroke and you’re looking for someone to come and do a, you know save that person’s life or to stabilize them you more than welcome the fire department to come in your front door and you’re really happy that they got there within 5 minutes or no more than 7, right Chief? And I think that everybody is very appreciative about that. One of the things the Chief started when he came in here was to do feedback cards and I read them and everybody was very appreciative of the fact that the fire department showed up for all of these calls and they really, like I say, were appreciative. So I think that’s what led to our whole thing of doing the duty crew. One of the things we asked the Chief to look at was what about this duty crew. Would that solve some of our problems because we were looking at expanding the fire department to a second station and the question was do we really want to spend our money there or is it spent someplace else you know much more effectively. And what we came up with was a duty crew. Now it mainly only works on the weekends but again in tracking the calls and in looking at the services that we perform it becomes very apparent that again people just don’t have heart attacks and strokes and they don’t fall in their home and they don’t do this on the weekend. It happens at any time, day or night. At probably the weirdest hours that you can imagine so it became very apparent and again this council looked at this and determined that yes, a duty crew operating during the week was a needed service for this community and it was something that the community had also given feedback that yes, that’s something that we want. So in order to do this, whether we have to make some changes to the fire station because again what that means is we’re going to have people in there at all hours of the day and night for the most part so they can’t stay up all night. Well we need a place for people to sleep and also to be available so that they can make that call to your home within the 3 to 5 minutes. All they have to do is go out and get in a truck and start driving. So I think that is a very needed service and it’s worthwhile and it is justified so I’m definitely in favor of spending the money for the duty crew expansion. The next one again I touched on kind of briefly about the street department. I think that one of the things in Mr. Sticha’s presentation that was interesting was since 2009 we really haven’t added a lot of people to the payroll here at the city Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 26 and the street department actually does a lot of work. Now I know you don’t see them out there a lot. They’re kind of the hidden people but they’re out there constantly again taking care of the roads of this city. Maintaining trails. Maintaining buildings. When you have a city such as this with the amount of assets and infrastructure that we have it wears out and it needs to be taken care of and that’s what the street maintenance department does. Also as we’ve increased I’m surprised we’re still able to keep the schedules we do with snowplowing. We did increase the mileage of roads this year. We’re going to be increasing the mileage next year and the year after that and I think that that’s a service everybody wants. They want their street plowed so that when they go to work at 6:00 a.m. or 7:00 at the latest they can get out of their driveway so that’s not a service I think we want to try to cut or dial back in any manner whatsoever so again that added employee helps us to maintain our streets during the summer. That employee could make a difference as far as patching the roads. We’ve talked about a number of ways to do that from either outsourcing it or to try to take care of it in-house and I guess that will be one of the first orders of business of our new engineer when he starts in January but that is something that’s needed is you need someone to do those work. Now I’m going to differ from the mayor on the park maintenance because I did initially, I was a little concerned about all of this additions after we had the meeting but as I’ve talked to you know the parks department and also presentations that we’ve been given we do have a lot of maintenance within the parks. I mean if you think about it every neighborhood within this city is only a few minutes away from a park. That’s a lot of parks and also a lot of those parks, like our roads are over 20 years old. They need to be maintained and they need to be, new equipment needs to be put in. Maintenance is probably one of the biggest things that you cannot skimp on because if you do so I think you’re putting our younger citizens at some risk that they’re going to get on a piece of playground equipment that breaks on them or you know has developed some kind of a hazard and no one’s there to fix it and they end up getting hurt. That’s not something that we want to see happen. So I think that the park maintenance employee is warranted. It’s not as though there isn’t the work to be done. I don’t think this person is going to be able to stand around and lean on a shovel or anything. There’s going to be plenty of work that needs to be accomplished so I think this is also justified and I would support it. The last one is probably the biggest one and as the mayor has said yes, we have gone round and round about this. We have discussed it. We have looked at everything from A to Z on this as a way to, how do we take care of our pavement management. Again you’re seeing $350,000 plus you’re seeing the franchise fee because we didn’t want to I think burden either homeowners solely with the ability of fix our roads and at the same time we didn’t want to put the burden on all taxpayers so we tried to find a way to split it. Also I was in favor of the franchise fee because that affects everyone in the city. Whereas levies do not. Levies only affect homeowners and taxpayers. The franchise fee affects everyone and I think it’s only fair that everyone have some interest in the roads of this community. I know that someone living out on Minnewashta Parkway is not going to be too concerned about you know a road in my subdivision being fixed but some day they may drive on that road just like some day I may drive on their road. I think it benefits us all that the roads of this city are kept in tip top shape because we used to be very proud about that. You know if you had a problem with your road you’d call up the engineering department and they would have someone out there and they would fix it. It’s getting a little bit more difficult to do that now again because of as I said the number of miles Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 27 and the fact that we are stretching the envelope as far as the city of Chanhassen. So I did agree and I did think even a couple years ago that this was the best approach. I was in favor of supporting it then but with the election what I understood was that again not everyone was in favor of it and I did not feel that it was right at that point for the majority of the council at that point who was not going to be around whenever the new regime came in, to saddle them with something that they were not quite comfortable with. So I thought it would be much fairer if we took the time. Went through it and if there was a better way to solve the problem we would find it at that point. Well we looked and we looked and the best way to solve it was to go back to what we talked about before. So I’m glad that we did resolve that problem and that we will be able to fix our roads but I think overall I do agree that with this budget yes, I’m going to be increasing the taxes of the residents. That’s not something that I’ve done before in the past and I’ve been very reluctant to do so. However in this particular case I think it’s warranted because again what everybody tells me is they want to have roads they can drive on. They want to have a park that they can send their children to and allow them to play without any worry and they also want to have good police services that they want to be able to feel safe within their community. So based upon all that and after a lot of soul searching and listening to everyone do their pitches on this I can support this budget including the duty crew, the street maintenance employee, the park maintenance employee and also the $350,000 for the pavement management program. Mayor Ryan: Alright thank you Councilman. Councilwoman Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Well thank you Mayor. When I left our Truth in Taxation hearing last Monday I heard a really funny statement and we had students here that were observing us and I think one of them said something like doesn’t anybody ever show up to these meetings or whatever it was and then someone else said to them well they only show up when you lower the levy and you know I think that that was a really funny statement but really true. I sat here too many nights probably discussing levies and you know this previous councils they have worked on lowering the levies and we’ve had residents here angry that we’re still spending too much money and now all of a sudden I come to a Truth in Taxation hearing meeting and no one’s here and it’s crickets and you know then I have to think about that. I have to think I represent the city and I represent the people of this city and nobody was here with questions or concerns and so that brings us to tonight and as you look at this list and the bullet points on it, you know we were feeling pretty good about all the first 6 of them that as a council thinks we’re as I think sometimes or always do our finance department kind of they iron out the wrinkles and really give us a clear picture of what we’re looking at as far as our levy. And then we had I think the domino effect of the franchise fee. I think that I did not support it for, not because there isn’t a need or that it wasn’t fair. You all I’ve expressed to you my concerns about that fee and how it can change. But if you then move forward again and the franchise fee is in place and so now all of a sudden we have money to work with for needs in our community and so when I look at this list moving forward you know I think number 7 maybe if I’m counting right is the expansion of the duty crew and Chief I just want you to know that there are sometimes special moments in this room and you can feel a presence in it. That it just feels so right and you’re so impressed and you’re kind of almost in awe and I think those moments are when I come in and your men are Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 28 standing in uniform and you’re here and we are either honoring their service or someone is retiring or something is happening. It’s just really special and it really is something that I take seriously and dearly and once again as we move on with our town and our developments our demographics are changing when it comes to age and when it comes to just the population in general. We need our first responders and you need us to support you the best we can and so thank you for giving us that honor of supporting you to take care of our residents. Then if you move onto the street maintenance department employee and the park maintenance employee, once again we have potholes to fill and we have parks to maintain and as we expand once again with our population we require or we request our developers either give us park dedication fees or land so we can have more parks. Well someone has to take care of those parks and someone has to fill those potholes and build those, they don’t build the roads but they certainly do maintain them and so I think one thing that’s a little deceiving is the $80,000. Maybe later on after I’m done Greg can talk about that a little bit because we’re not actually paying a new employee $80,000. Well when you hire a new employee there are things that come with that. Benefits, insurance, correct? Greg Sticha: Correct. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yes so hopefully we can probably talk about that a little bit. The one that I’m going to support but I’m hesitate about is the pavement management program funding. I feel like when we did the franchise fee hearings and we gave information to the public we didn’t add this in there. Oh by the way this is what’s going to come next but this too has to come and happen if the franchise fee program is going to be successful. So as you can tell this just, it’s a lot of money and it’s a lot of responsibility and it’s a big step moving for our city and so I don’t take it lightly but I do support all of these initiatives that have been listed. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilwoman. Councilman Campion. Councilman Campion: Alright. So some good comments from all. This budgeting process does take a lot of soul searching. It was you know something when I got elected back in 2014, you know one of the things that I thought I was going to be most against is you know ever raising the budget or adding items to it. To the levy. But then after being on the council and looking at a budget year after year you realize that you know sticking to new growth and new growth only it does create some holes in the services because the cost of getting things done every year does increase and we’ve done a good job of being good stewards of the money. For many years we have the lowest tax rate you know of our KFS cities and surrounding cities but if I go through these one by one yes, I think the increase to keep up with new growth is a must. The reduction in the health care costs is you know great and we’ll accept it. I think that planning for building permit revenue to be the same as 2019 is pragmatic and a good assumption. 3 percent increase in the cost of living and merit pay, I support that. The 5 percent increase in police services contract. Yes we need to do that to keep our residents safe. The market value increasing by 5 percent, again positive that speaks to you know all the things that we’re doing right here in Chanhassen. The duty crew expansion, it is a big price tag and that is one that I did wrestle with Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 29 you know back and forth but you know, and it is to help provide that continuation of you know safety services that go along with being ready to put out fires should there be you know such an event and as digging into it more I think it is something that we need. The street maintenance department employee and the additional $350,000 for the pavement management program funding, both I believe are needed. They’re in line with the franchise fee as we discussed. I think getting our streets back into solid condition will you know promote residents to make improvements to their house. Todd I think you’re making some mention of that and I have seen that in other neighborhoods where we have done the street projects recently. You do see you know kind of a slow explosion of improvement after improvement just because you know suddenly when the roads looks nicer it calls a little bit more attention to the houses around them so I’m supportive of both those items. And the park maintenance department employee I believe that’s something we need as well. I believe that our parks are really one of the jewels of Chanhassen and I mean everyone that lives here talks about them and all of my friends and family that come to visit Chanhassen as well are astounded by the quality of them. You know we have our plan to finish repairing the playground equipment and I think that’s something we need. We need to do well so I am in support of each item listed here and the budget as proposed. Mayor Ryan: Thank you Councilman Campion. Mr. Sticha I believe that Ms. Tjornhom had a couple questions in terms of the $80,000 per employee. Total cost if you want to, if you could break that down a little bit that would be helpful please. Greg Sticha: The budgeted $80,000, of that actual salary is $30,000 less than that. Once you pay for health insurance, pension cost, federal and state taxes, over $30,000 of that is for those costs so the actual pay of the employee is significantly less than that. Mayor Ryan: And then one other point of clarification. Again more of a transparency thing but, and clarification. I do want to confirm that as part of our franchise fee when we had the overall discussion on how we were going to achieve that $3.6 million we did discuss adding that $350,000 as part of the levy in that conversation. Greg Sticha: We did and it needed to either be added this year or next year. This year it gave you a little more safety depending on when we started collecting the franchise fees so that’s why it was included for this year. Mayor Ryan: And another part of that reason is because of the 16 percent reduction in health care costs we were able to, was that another reason why the $350,000 worked for this year? Versus waiting for it until next year. Greg Sticha: Certainly the health care cost reduction really helped all line items. Mayor Ryan: Right, right. Greg Sticha: So it was impactful to every single one that you see an increase for. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 30 Mayor Ryan: Right. Greg Sticha: So in theory yeah it helped all of them. Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you. Councilman McDonald: Madam Mayor if you’re ready I’ll make a. Mayor Ryan: Could I make one more comment before and then I’ll let you make your motion. I appreciate it. It’s just the point because I do want to support this overall budget I, and I know that 3 council members did support the park maintenance department employee of $80,000. I know one point Mr. Hoffman, and I don’t know if you can speak to this or not at this time but there was some discussion of even having the park maintenance employee also help with, in the street department sometimes or is that not doable? Todd Hoffman: Currently we already do that and this person would as well. Mayor Ryan: Okay. So the last time we added a park maintenance employee was 22 years ago. We’ve doubled the size of our park system, trail system since that time. We do a lot with seasonal employees but at some point you lose the efficiencies of monitoring those people and keeping track so each time we add an employee there’s always somebody from the park department that is going to be plowing streets. At some point they’re going to take a route and so there’s crossover throughout those two divisions. Mayor Ryan: Okay thank you for that clarification. Councilman McDonald if you’d like to make a motion. Councilman McDonald: Thank you Madam Mayor. I would make the following motion. That the City Council adopts the attached resolution establishing the 2020 final levy of $11,741,368 and approves general fund expenditures of $11,899,700. It also approves the CIP for 2020 through 2024 in the total amount of $106,696,900. Mayor Ryan: We have a valid motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Ryan: Any discussion? If I could make one more comment and this is to all of council before we move forward with making this vote. I just want to say that I know that this is a challenging vote for all of us because this is a change from how it’s been done in the past. I think we are all fiscally conservative when it comes to taxpayer dollars and I know that this is a departure from how it’s been done for many years and I too take that very seriously but I just, I want to extend my appreciation for the hard work that City Council has done working with staff Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 31 and my appreciation to staff for really digging in deep with the numbers and understanding that new growth is not going to, is not sustainable for the future and I think all of us sit here today not for just planning for 2020 but planning beyond 2020 and that is why that this increase this year is vitally important so I just want to extend my appreciation to council on taking the time and digging deep into the numbers but also going line by line this evening to explain your stance on this overall budget so, any other comments? With not we have a valid motion. A second. Resolution #2019-60: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the City Council adopts the attached resolution establishing the 2020 final levy of $11,741,368 and approves general fund expenditures of $11,899,700. It also approves the CIP for 2020 through 2024 in the total amount of $106,696,900. All voted in favor, except Councilwoman Coleman who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. Mayor Ryan: That motion carries 4-1. Thank you everybody. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: ANNOUNCE RESULTS OF CITY MANAGER’S 2019 PERFORMANCE REVIEW. Mayor Ryan: Last we have council presentation. We are announcing the results of the City Manager’s 2019 performance review and I will do that Mr. Gerhardt. So here we go. Todd Gerhardt: …City Attorney has to cross his fingers. Mayor Ryan: First and foremost on behalf of the City Council Mr. Gerhardt I’d like to say thank you for an excellent year. We are appreciative of the countless hours of hard work you put in over the course of 2019 so we thank you for that. For those of you unfamiliar with the review process the City Council evaluates Mr. Gerhardt on 7 core areas. Quality of work, leadership, job knowledge, strategic initiative, integrity and trust, cooperation and communication in customer service. We then give a numeric ranking for each category with supporting commentary and discussion resulting in a final performance evaluation. The council has already shared our results with Mr. Gerhardt so tonight I’d like to share a general summary review with the public. It is without question that Mr. Gerhardt is an excellent city manager and overall he received a 2.6 out of 3 final rating. Mr. Gerhardt’s highest rankings were in the areas of job knowledge and integrity and trust. The City of Chanhassen is extremely fortunate to have a city manager whose institutional knowledge is unparalleled. As council has said Mr. Gerhardt continues to have the utmost respect from his peer group of city managers and city and county administrators and his depth of knowledge is a tremendous benefit to the council, staff and city. In this role Mr. Gerhardt works with a variety of individuals and groups representing a vast number of interests. That is why it is imperative that a level of trust is established. The council credits and appreciates Mr. Gerhardt for both his trustworthy and being professional in all of his relationships. He keeps conversations confidential and is honest when confronted with a challenging situation. When an error has occurred Mr. Gerhardt accepts responsibility, be it for himself or as an extension as one of the staff members. Mr. Gerhardt works diligently at all Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 32 times to insure he can be trusted by City Council, his staff and our residents. The council also felt that Mr. Gerhardt’s leadership and commitment to customer service are excellent. The council asks a lot of Mr. Gerhardt as we hear from residents daily. Questions and requests are answered promptly by Mr. Gerhardt or are referred to the proper department to be addressed and answered. There is never a time that Mr. Gerhardt says he won’t or he can’t meet with somebody one on one or make a phone call to help facilitate finding a solution. Mr. Gerhardt never backs away from any requests and he always puts others first which epitomizes his leadership and customer service. With any role there are opportunities to grow and this is one area that will be a goal for next year as we focus on strategic initiative. With a growing and evolving city thinking outside the box, adapting to changing needs and having a strategic vision is something that is imperative for Chanhassen’s long term success. As was the case this year we’ll again be confronted with development proposals, financial challenges and a myriad of resident concerns or questions so strategic initiative could never be more important and we know and we are confident that Mr. Gerhardt is up for this challenge. So again Todd, Mr. Gerhardt congratulations on an excellent performance review and a year of hard work. You are so incredibly valued by your residents, your staff and your city council. Thank you for all that you do day in and day out for our city. Congratulations. Thank you. Todd Gerhardt: Thank you. Well whew, what do you say after something like that? I’d like to, I think I always every year I say I did it all by myself but I’ve got some of the best department heads in the metro area. They all don’t have the same personalities because if they did they couldn’t do their jobs. You know Todd Hoffman has put in 33 years as our park and rec director and he amazes me every year with his decision making, his vision for our park department and infrastructure improvements. I think Dan hit it right on the head. The best compliment Todd you can get is when people come into our community and how impressed they are with our park system. Even our city attorney who has a family that played a lot of soccer said that we have some of the best soccer fields that his kids have ever played on. Yes, and I don’t know if Roger played soccer. Roger Knutson: Not much. Todd Gerhardt: But you know Kate is very passionate about planning and cares so much about this community and is why she’s dedicated most of her career here. Greg we’re still trying to figure out but if you can’t tell what Greg’s passion is during his budget presentation and his fiscal responsibility of the city funds, it’s unprecedented. And I think Bruce Loney our interim public works director said Greg hasn’t changed a bit since the time he worked in Shakopee so Greg keep doing what you’re doing. It’s working. And our new addition Jake Foster, again we found a diamond in the rough with Jake. We interviewed I think 5 assistant city managers and Jake just stood out amongst those and he’s impressed everybody from the get go. Our street department are dedicated employees. Park maintenance. Our building department. When you come in and get a building permit you’re going to get an inspection. I can say in not every community in the metro area that happens but in this city when you pay a building permit fee you will get not just one but in some cases several inspections. They do their job and they do it Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 33 well because they’ve worked in the fields. They worked in the trades so they understand what goes into that and that builds on our customer service and, so they understand what those contractors are going through. And what I’d like to do now is introduce Charlie Howley who is our new public works director who I like to say I’ve interviewed more public works directors in the last month than I can count on any of my two hands but once I saw Charlie’s resume and his experience is just perfect for our engineering department. He’s strong in stormwater management. He’s strong in project management. He’s been a city council member. I mean that’s crazy in itself but he has that experience. He knows what it’s like to be on the other side of the table. And he’s serving on a watershed district so everything that you would want to see in a public works director Mr. Howley has and I’m excited for him to start and I think he’s excited to be with us based on the number of emails and questions he’s asked me in the last month and some of the other staff and not to forget our fire department and our police department. Thank you for helping Don Johnson with our duty crew. This is bringing us to a new level. It is going to bring organization to a fire department. It’s not the bucket brigade anymore. It’s an organization where people can sign up and know the time of when to serve and they don’t have to leave their wife at a restaurant and go on a fire call. So I credit Don for slowly building this model. Showing the City Council the benefits of it and in the midst of that completing our fire study plan. Once we’ve completed our fire study plan what do you do next? You develop the next one and Don is fiscally responsible. He reached out to his department and asked them would you guys want to develop our next fire study plan and I think it took less than a couple of days and they got back to him and said we would love to do that. And so Don and his team are going to develop the next fire study plan for the City of Chanhassen for the next 10 years. So credit goes to Don. Lance Pearce, our Lieutenant. You know he leads a team of 15 officers to make this one of the safest communities. Our community surveys tell us that people feel safe going for a walk in the evening. There isn’t a lot of communities that people can say that and, but that’s something our community feels safe doing. And they’re not afraid to get out of the car and knock on the door and say please close your garage door you know so we don’t give out crimes of opportunity for people as they drive through looking for those things because that’s what criminals do. They look for opportunities and Lance preaches that to his department and Lance is the first one to jump on board to work with us on enhancing mental health awareness in our community. He’s going to be a part of our team. We’re going to expand on that even more as we go into 2020 and I’m excited about that. It’s something very dear to my heart and I think the council’s going to be really impressed with the overall outcome of our mental health discussions that we’re going to have in the next couple weeks. But again thank you for the positive feedback. Again my point is I can’t do my job without the help of my department heads and they really make me look good. And a great council and mayor. And a city attorney. And Holy Family too. Todd Hoffman: Unsie. Todd Gerhardt: Oh yes our newspaper where in our community survey where most of our residents get our information from is the Villager so. And Unsie I don’t know where the best Christmas lights are so sorry I didn’t get back to you. Chanhassen City Council – December 09, 2019 34 Mayor Ryan: Thank you Mr. Gerhardt. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Mayor Ryan: Alright before we adjourn I would just like to wish my fellow council members as well as city staff and all of our residents a very Merry Christmas and a happy and safe holiday season and look forward to a successful 2020 but appreciate the hard work that we all have done together in a successful 2019 and look forward to an even stronger 2020. So with that I will stand for a motion to adjourn. Councilman Campion moved, Councilwoman Coleman seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 9, 2019 Mayor Ryan called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ryan, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilman Campion, and Councilwoman Coleman STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Jake Foster, Kate Aanenson, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, and Jill Sinclair SOUTHWEST TRANSIT UPDATE. LEN SIMICH Len Simich reviewed highlights of ridership numbers, Prime MD expansion, airport service in 2020, expanded vehicle storage, asset management, unmet needs due to budget cuts from Metropolitan Council, regional technologies, reviewed information related to the proposed resolution that the council will vote on at their regular meeting, and future needs moving forward. Mayor Ryan asked about the stance taken by the City’s representative at Met Council. Councilman McDonald asked Len Simich to explain BRT. Mayor Ryan asked about the long term goal of Met Council squeezing funding for Southwest Transit. Todd Gerhardt asked if Chanhassen state legislators can put pressure on Met Council. Councilman McDonald explained how the Prime program works. Mayor Ryan asked how the council can help once the resolution is passed and what cities are involved in the Opt Out program. Councilman McDonald explained that he will pull the resolution off the consent agenda so Len Simich can give a brief presentation. YARD WASTE DROPOFF UPDATE. Todd Gerhardt introduced Jill Sinclair who provided an update on the two events that were held after closure of the Carver County Environmental Center and suggestions from residents for possible changes. Councilman McDonald asked if there was confusion through marketing. Mayor Ryan discussed comments she’s received regarding the City charging a fee for drop off of yard waste before asking that the council continue to discuss this topic early in 2020. Jill Sinclair explained how the $17,000 grant money received from Carver County is used for recycling and solid waste. Mayor Ryan asked for an analysis of how the grant program operates showing revenue versus expenses. Mayor Ryan adjourned the work session at 6:35 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Approval of a Three Lot/Four Outlot Subdivision with Variances at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway (Boylan Shores) Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.2. Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case 2019­17 PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council approves a preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots with variances as shown in plans stamped "Received November 1, 2019," subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Decision." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The applicant is requesting to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots for single­family detached housing.  The property is located east of Country Oaks Drive, west of Lake Minnewashta and is bisected by Minnewashta Parkway.Access to the site is proposed via a private street off of Country Oaks Drive.Sewer and water are available to the site.The property is zoned Single­Family Residential (RSF) and falls within the Shoreland Overlay District. BACKGROUND As a condition of approval of the Glendale Drive Homes subdivision, located north of the subject site, the city maintained ownership of Outlot B.  It was part of a larger strip and was created with the intent to combine it with the property to the east at the time of development.  That outlot was tax forfeited and reverted to the city.  This outlot serves no public interest and will be combined with the proposed subdivision to provide access to the subject site. DISCUSSION On December 3, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item.  They unanimously recommended approval of the request with conditions outlined in the staff report. RECOMMENDATION “The Chanhassen City Council approves a preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots with variances as shown in plans stamped "Received November 1, 2019," subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and Findings of Fact and Decision.” CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectApproval of a Three Lot/Four Outlot Subdivision with Variances at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway(Boylan Shores)Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.2.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case 2019­17PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council approves a preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlotswith variances as shown in plans stamped "Received November 1, 2019," subject to the conditions of approval andadopts the Findings of Fact and Decision."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe applicant is requesting to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots for single­family detachedhousing.  The property is located east of Country Oaks Drive, west of Lake Minnewashta and is bisected byMinnewashta Parkway.Access to the site is proposed via a private street off of Country Oaks Drive.Sewer andwater are available to the site.The property is zoned Single­Family Residential (RSF) and falls within the ShorelandOverlay District.BACKGROUNDAs a condition of approval of the Glendale Drive Homes subdivision, located north of the subject site, the citymaintained ownership of Outlot B.  It was part of a larger strip and was created with the intent to combine it with theproperty to the east at the time of development.  That outlot was tax forfeited and reverted to the city.  This outlotserves no public interest and will be combined with the proposed subdivision to provide access to the subject site.DISCUSSIONOn December 3, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item.  They unanimously recommendedapproval of the request with conditions outlined in the staff report.RECOMMENDATION“The Chanhassen City Council approves a preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots with variances as shown in plans stamped "Received November 1, 2019," subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and Findings of Fact and Decision.” ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Planning Commission Minutes dated December 3, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, December 3, 2019 Subject Consider a Request for a Subdivision with Variances at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway (Boylan Shores) Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1. Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner File No: 2019­17 PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots with variances as shown in plans stamped "Received November 1, 2019", subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation . SUMMARY OF REQUEST Subdivision of 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots with variances.   APPLICANT Harold Worrell, Laketown Builders, P.O. Box 89, Waconia, MN 55387 SITE INFORMATION PRESENT ZONING:  Single­Family Residential District, RSF LAND USE:Residential Low Density (1.2­4.0 units/net acre) ACREAGE:  2.71 acres  DENSITY:  1.1 units per acre  APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Sec. 18­22. ­ Variances Sec. 18­57. ­ Streets Sec. 18­60. ­ Lots(f) Chapter 20, Article XII, RSF District BACKGROUND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, December 3, 2019SubjectConsider a Request for a Subdivision with Variances at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway (BoylanShores)Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner File No: 2019­17PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into threelots and four outlots with variances as shown in plans stamped "Received November 1, 2019", subject to theconditions of approval, and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation .SUMMARY OF REQUESTSubdivision of 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots with variances.  APPLICANTHarold Worrell, Laketown Builders, P.O. Box 89, Waconia, MN 55387SITE INFORMATIONPRESENT ZONING:  Single­Family Residential District, RSFLAND USE:Residential Low Density (1.2­4.0 units/net acre)ACREAGE:  2.71 acres DENSITY:  1.1 units per acre APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 18, SubdivisionsSec. 18­22. ­ VariancesSec. 18­57. ­ StreetsSec. 18­60. ­ Lots(f)Chapter 20, Article XII, RSF District BACKGROUND As a condition of approval of the Glendale Drive Homes subdivision, located north of the subject site, the city maintained ownership of Outlot B.  It was part of a larger strip and was created with the intent to combine it with the property to the east at the time of development.  That outlot was tax forfeited and reverted to the city.  This outlot served no public interest and will be combined with the proposed subdivision to provide access to the subject site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots and a variance to allow a private street and lots to be bisected by a public street as shown in plans stamped “Received November 1, 2019”, subject to the conditions of approval found in the attached staff report, and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision Recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report Findings of Fact and Recommendation Development Review Application Preliminary Plan Sheets Public Hearing Notice Affidavit of Mailing Letter of Extension CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: December 3, 2019 CC DATE: January 13, 2020 REVIEW DEADLINE: February 28, 2020 CASE #: 2019-17 BY: SJ, ET, EH, TH, JS SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivision of 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots with variances. LOCATION: East of Country Oaks Drive, west of Lake Minnewashta and bisected by Minnewashta Parkway. APPLICANT: Harold Worrell PROPERTY OWNER: Dale Willenbring Laketown Builders Rick & Susan Dorsey P.O. Box 89 Waconia, MN 55387 harold@laketownbuilders.com 612-501-8813 PRESENT ZONING: Single-Family Residential District, RSF 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Residential Low Density (1.2 – 4.0 units/net acre) ACREAGE: 2.71 acres DENSITY: 1.1 units per acre LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the city must approve the preliminary plat. This is a quasi-judicial decision. The city’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Subdivision Ordinances for variances. The city has a relatively high level of discretion with a variance because the applicant is seeking a deviation from established standards. This is a quasi-judicial decision. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots with variances as shown in plans stamped, Received November 1, 2019, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the findings of fact and decision recommendation.” Subject Property Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 2 of 17 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chapter 18, Subdivisions Sec. 18-22. - Variances Sec. 18-57. - Streets Sec. 18-60. - Lots(f) Chapter 20, Article XII, RSF District PROPOSAL/SUMMARY The applicant is requesting to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots for single- family detached housing. The property is located east of Country Oaks Drive, west of Lake Minnewashta and is bisected by Minnewashta Parkway. Access to the site is proposed via a private street off of Country Oaks Drive. Sewer and water are available to the site. The property is zoned Single-Family Residential (RSF) and falls within the Shoreland Overlay District. Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 3 of 17 BACKGROUND As a condition of approval of the Glendale Drive Homes subdivision, located north of the subject site, the city maintained ownership of Outlot B. It was part of a larger strip and was created with the intent to combine it with the property to the east at the time of development. That outlot was tax forfeited and reverted to the city. This outlot served no public interest and will be combined with the proposed subdivision to provide access to the subject site. SUBDIVISION The applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots for single-family detached housing. The property is located east of Country Oaks Drive, west of Lake Minnewashta and is bisected by Minnewashta Parkway. Access to the site is proposed via a private street off of Country Oaks Drive. Sewer and water is available to the site. The property is zoned Single-Family Residential (RSF) and falls within the Shoreland Overlay District. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum area, width and depth requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Outlot B Glendale Drive Homes subdivision Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 4 of 17 Outlot A is intended to be deeded to the property immediately west of the subject site in exchange for a small segment of property, shown in yellow, to allow the applicant to achieve a 30-foot frontage on a public right-of-way (ROW). Outlot B will house a private street. Outlots C and D are intended to serve Lots 2 and 3, respectively. Staff is recommending Outlot C be made part of Lot 2 and Outlot D be part of Lot 3. This will insure that these two outlots never get sold separately and remain as part of the individual lots. This process will require a variance since the City Code defines lots as “Lot means a separate parcel, tract, or area of land undivided by any public street or approved private street, which has been established by plat, metes and bounds subdivision, or as otherwise permitted by law, and which is occupied by or intended to be developed for and occupied by a principal building or group of such buildings and accessory buildings, or utilized for a principal use and uses accessory thereto, including such open spaces and yards as are designed and arranged or required by chapter 20 for such building, use or development.” Minnewashta Parkway is an existing ROW that bisects these parcels. There is a second variance attached to the application that deals with serving the homes via a private street off of Country Oaks Drive. This variance will be discussed in detail later in the report. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY The applicant has provided an existing conditions survey that adequately conforms to the requirements found under Sec. 18-40 of City Ordinance. Currently, there is one existing single- family residence located at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway with a gravel access off of Minnewashta Parkway. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing structures from the property along with abandoning the gravel access as illustrated on the existing conditions survey, which also incorporates the removal plan. All removal of structures on the property will require a building permit prior to any demolition work or construction activities. Removal of the access will require an Underground Utility Permit (ROW permit), including the installation of a contiguous curb and gutter consistent with the existing Minnewashta Parkway curb and gutter. The installation of the curb should occur after the construction entrance has been permanently removed. Outlot A Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 5 of 17 EASEMENTS The applicant is proposing the dedication of drainage and utility easements (D&Us) for the subdivision that meet Sec. 18-76. of City Ordinance. A majority of the lots and outlots are encompassed by 10-foot D&Us (or larger). The width and size of these D&Us are greater than what is typically dedicated to meet city requirements (side and rear lots typically are 5-foot D&Us); this is due to the stormwater and drainage infrastructure proposed. As illustrated in Figure 1 below, a D&U encompasses “Outlot B” which is proposed to be a private street, and another D&U encompasses a proposed stormwater bio-filtration basin. All D&Us, as illustrated on the preliminary plat, are adequate for their intended purpose. Figure 1 – Adequate Drainage and Utility Easements for Street & Stormwater BMP It appears from the preliminary plat that adequate ROW of Minnewashta Parkway has been dedicated (50-foot wide ROW existing, 66-foot wide ROW proposed), however the existing trail on the west side of Minnewashta Parkway is not illustrated. Furthermore, the lot to the north was recently subdivided (Glendale Drive Homes subdivision), and the final plat was recorded in November of 2019. Glendale Drive Homes was conditioned to dedicate adequate ROW for Minnewashta Parkway and said trail as well. The applicant shall ensure that prior to recording of final plat that the proposed eastern lot lines abutting Minnewashta Parkway align with the eastern lot line of Glendale Drive Homes’ Lot 5, and adequate ROW has been dedicated for Minnewashta Parkway. STREETS The proposed subdivision abuts Minnewashta Parkway to the east and Country Oaks Drive to the west. Access to all three lots on the preliminary plat are proposed to be had from Country Oaks Drive via a private street. Public Works/Engineering does not find it appropriate to construct a public street as one is not required to serve other parcels, improve access, nor is a street extension in this area called for in the comprehensive plan. Furthermore, in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, no additional access should be had off Minnewashta Parkway for the newly created lots. The proposed private street has been designed to include an acceptable alternative to a hammerhead in order to meet Fire Code and City Ordinance regarding dead-end fire apparatus access road turnarounds. The private street is required to use traffic control that is consistent with Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 6 of 17 the current version of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, along with meeting the criteria listed out in Sec. 18-57.n, o., and p. Sec. 18-57.p.2 includes the requirement that covenants concerning maintenance and snow plowing operations shall be filed against all benefit properties. A similar agreement for maintenance responsibilities between the properties is addressed under “Stormwater Management” of this report regarding the stormwater BMPs. RETAINING WALLS One retaining wall is proposed and is located on Lot 2. As currently proposed, the retaining wall spans approximately 110 feet and has a maximum height of 3 feet, therefore Sec. 20-1025 (retaining walls) of City Ordinance does not apply. If the retaining wall, measured from bottom of footing to top of wall, ever exceeds 4 feet through subsequent plan changes, all requirements listed in Sec. 20-1025 shall be adhered to. GRADING & DRAINAGE Grading operations will impact a large majority of the proposed subdivision (mass grading). It appears grading has been proposed to route stormwater away from buildings, however drainage arrows were not provided on the grading plans. Updated grading plans illustrating drainage arrows will be required upon submission of final plat for review by the city. From the proposed grading plans and the provided preliminary Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) prepared by David Poggi, PE of Civil Methods, Inc., it appears portions of Lot 2 and Lot 3 do not direct stormwater runoff to the proposed stormwater bio-filtration basin: sub-catchment 3 (a portion of Lot 2) drains south directly onto an adjacent property and sub-catchment 2 (more than half of Lot 3 and a portion of Lot 2) drains east directly onto Minnewashta Parkway, as seen from Figure 2 below. For clarity, the proposed drainage pattern of each sub-catchment should be illustrated, Appendix B (Drainage Diagram) in the SMP shall be updated to include drainage arrows. Figure 2 - Drainage Diagram (Arrows Added Based on Model & Grading) Directing drainage onto adjacent properties shall be prohibited, including any emergency overflows. If the applicant is proposing to direct untreated stormwater drainage into the public storm sewer system, accompanying modeling and analysis showing the impact and adequate sizing and treatment of the additional stormwater to the public system shall be provided. Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 7 of 17 Furthermore, as the applicant is proposing to route all of sub-catchment 1, which includes the bio-filtration basin, to the public stormwater system, additional modeling verifying adequate capacity in the downstream public system shall be provided for review and approval of the city. Lastly, it is unclear how drainage from the private street is intended to be captured and routed to the proposed stormwater bio-filtration basin. This is typically achieved in urbanized road sections by catch-basins constructed at low points that collect runoff and then route the stormwater via an underground conveyance system (i.e. pipes). No catch-basin(s) or conveyance system was proposed. In accordance with Sec. 18-57.p.4, updated plans shall incorporate best practices and designs on how the private street system will provide adequate drainage (a design adequate for the 10-year storm event). Based on the updated plans, the provided HydroCAD and P8 models may be required to be updated. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL The proposed development will exceed one (1) acre of disturbance and will, therefore, be subject to the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination/State Disposal System (NPDES Construction Permit). The applicant has prepared and submitted a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the city for review. The SWPPP is a required submittal element for preliminary plat review. No earth disturbing activities may occur until an approved SWPPP is developed. This SWPPP shall be a standalone document consistent with the NPDES Construction Permit and shall contain all required elements as listed in the permit. The SWPPP will need to be updated as the plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub-contractors are identified and as other conditions change. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN Sanitary sewer and water service is available off Minnewashta Parkway and Country Oaks Drive via a 10” PVC sanitary main and 12” DIP water main, and 8” PVC sanitary main and 6” DIP water main, respectively. The applicant is proposing to extend approximately 300 feet of 6” C900 water main with the extension of the private street. The extended 6” water main is furnished with a fire hydrant at the end of the line to supply fire suppression needs and to allow for the water main to be flushed and maintained. As the water main is within a private street, staff recommends that the utility be designated as a private utility. Also, this installation will require a ROW permit and shall be installed in accordance with city standards and specifications. Coordination with the Public Works Department 48-hours prior to commencement of work is required. Water services for Lots 1 and 3 are proposed to be had from the newly installed private water main, with water service for Lot 2 being from the existing utility service for 6760 Minnewashta Parkway. In order to improve water quality and reduce the need for more routine flushing of the main (i.e, conservation of treated water), Lot 2’s water service shall be drawn from the private main. Subsequently, the existing water service shall be abandoned in place. As the water service hook- up charge for the existing property has been paid, the hook-up fee for the connection of Lot 2 would be waived. Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 8 of 17 The applicant is proposing no extension of sanitary sewer mains as existing infrastructure can supply adequate services to the three lots. However, the newly created service lateral for Lot 1 crosses the newly proposed extended water main service. The applicant shall update plans to illustrate a tap location for sanitary sewer that does not require a potential conflict or crosses the extended water main. Also, the existing lateral for Lot 2 is being proposed for sanitary service. As this lateral is older and its condition not known, it shall be verified in good working condition by the contractor prior to connection. Lastly, tapping into the public sanitary sewer mains within public right-of-way will require a permit. This ROW permit can be filed jointly with the water main extension ROW permit. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required stormwater management development standards. Section 19-141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.” The applicant has provided a stormwater management proposal that generally meets the standards set forth in Chapter 19, and was reviewed to be feasible for the site. The applicant has submitted a preliminary SMP produced by David Poggi, PE (MN No. 44573) with Civil Methods, Inc. The applicant proposed treatment of stormwater runoff with the use of a bio-filtration basin located on the southeast side of Lot 1. Based on the information and analysis provided, this is an acceptable approach that will provide a sufficient level of retention to meet the volume control requirements and the filtration media proposed will provide sufficient levels of treatment to meet the quality requirements of the city. However, based on observations discussed previously under “Grading and Drainage”, updated plans accompanied by updated models shall be provided for review and approval. It was also noted that after treatment, the basin will route runoff to an existing stormwater catch basin located on Minnewashta Parkway. If subsequent modeling and analysis provides adequate justification that this approach is feasible, the connection to the catch basin will require a ROW permit and the connection shall be in accordance with the most current City Standards and Specifications. Lastly, the applicant shall provide an operation and maintenance plan (O&M) for the private stormwater BMPs. The O&M of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity and must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, to be recorded against the benefiting properties (Lots 1-3). A Homeowners Association (HOA) encompassing all lots is required to ensure the technical expertise and funding mechanisms for the operation and maintenance of stormwater treatment devices is recorded in perpetuity. STORMWATER UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGES Section 4-30 of City Code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. A water quality and water quantity fee is collected with a subdivision. These fees are based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 9 of 17 This fee will be applied to the new lots of record being created. It is highly likely that 2020 rates will be used to calculate fees for the proposed subdivision, however, they are currently not available in order to provide an estimate. In order to provide the applicant with an estimate, 2019 rates can be used with the understanding that rates are subject to increase in 2020. The 2019 estimate is calculated as shown in the table below: PER ACRE FEE ACRES FEE $8,320 2.71 22,547.20$ $8,320 0.06 (499.20)$ $8,320 0.75 (6,240.00)$ 1.9 15,808.00$ AREA GROSS AREA ROW OUTLOTS NET AREA SURFACE WATER DEVELOPMENT FEE ASSESSMENTS Water and sewer partial hookups are due at the time of final plat. The partial hookup fees will be assessed at the rate in effect at that time. It is highly likely that 2020 rates will be used to calculate fees for the proposed subdivision, however they are currently not available in order to provide an estimate. In order to provide the applicant with an estimate, 2019 rates can be used with the understanding that rates are subject to increase in 2020. The 2019 rates are $2,311/unit and $691/unit for water and sewer, respectively. The remaining sewer and water hookups fees are due with the building permit. FEES Based on the proposal, the following fees would be collected with the Development Contract if recorded in 2019 (fees are subject to increase for 2020): a) Administration Fee: based on the cost of the installation of improvements (to be provided by the applicant); when less than $500,000.00, three percent (3%) of the cost b) Surface Water Management Fee: $15,808.00 c) A portion of the water hook-up charge: $2,311/unit @ 2 units: $4,622.00 d) A portion of the sanitary sewer hook-up charge: $691/unit @ 2 units: $1,382.00 e) Park Dedication Fee: $11,600.00 f) GIS Fees: $25 for the plat plus $10 per parcel @ 3 parcels: $55.00 LANDSCAPING AND TREE PRESERVATION The applicant for the Boylan Shores development has submitted tree canopy coverage and preservation calculations. They are as follows: Total upland area (excluding wetlands) 2.71 ac. or 118,047 SF Baseline canopy coverage 58% or 69,260 SF Minimum canopy coverage required 35% or 41,316 SF Proposed tree preservation 8.6% or 10,152 SF The developer does not meet minimum canopy coverage for the site, therefore the applicant must bring the canopy coverage on site up to the 35% minimum. The difference between the required Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 10 of 17 coverage and the remaining coverage is multiplied by 1.2 for total area to be replaced. One tree is valued at 1,089 SF. Minimum required 41,316 SF Less canopy preserved 10,152 SF Minimum canopy coverage to be replaced 31,164 SF Multiplied by 1.2 37,396 SF Divided by 1089 =Total number of trees to be planted 34 trees The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that meets requirements showing 34 trees to be planted within the development. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN The city’s Comprehensive Park Plan calls for a neighborhood park to be located within one-half mile of every residence in the city. The proposed Boylan Shores is wholly located within the Roundhouse Park neighborhood park service area. Roundhouse Park features the following amenities: swimming beach, playground, swings, picnic shelter, fishing pier, tennis court, four pickleball courts, basketball court, skating rink, open play field, trails and parking area. COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL PLAN The city’s Comprehensive Trail Plan calls for public parks to be connected to neighborhoods through a combination of sidewalks and trails. The proposed Boylan Shores is connected by sidewalk to Roundhouse Park and the Minnewashta Parkway pedestrian trail. This existing trail should be protected and maintained in an open condition throughout the subdivision development and housing construction. Roundhouse Park Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 11 of 17 COMPLIANCE TABLE RSF Setbacks: Front: 30 feet, Side: 10 feet SUBDIVISION - FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance. Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single-Family District and the zoning ordinance if the private street variance is approved. 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and subdivision ordinance. 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development. Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter. Finding: The proposed subdivision is served by adequate urban infrastructure. Lot Area (sq. ft.) Lot Width Lot Depth 25 %Maximum Site Coverage (sq. ft.) Code (RSF) 15,000 90 125 3,750 Lot 1 31,043 193 133 7,760.75 Lot 2 20,082 100 270 5,020.5 Lot 3 21,128 90 258 5,282 Outlot A 1,328 Outlot B 11,497 Outlot C 10,448 Outlot D 9,442 Total 104,965 Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 12 of 17 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record. Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. 7. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: a. Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. b. Lack of adequate roads. c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets. VARIANCE FINDINGS VARIANCE Section 18-57. Streets. (r) Private streets serving up to four (4) lots may be permitted in the A2, RR, RSF and R4 if the criteria in variance section 18-22 are met and upon consideration of the following: (1) The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public street. In making this determination, the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands. (2) After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. (3) The use of a private street will permit enhanced protection of the city's natural resources, including wetlands and protected areas. Lots 2 and 3 will own Outlots C and D. Staff is recommending Lot 3 be combined with Outlot C and Lot 2 with Outlot D. This will insure that the outlots do not get sold separately. The City Code defines a lot as one piece undivided by a public street. Minnewashta Parkway is an existing street and this will insure that these parcels remain as one. Minnewashta Parkway is a collector road and the city always works diligently to close access off of collector roads. The option of all the lots accessing directly from Minnewashta Parkways is Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 13 of 17 not recommended from a safety standpoint. Each of the separate accesses creates a potential conflict point with traffic on Minnewashta Parkway, a collector street. Staff is recommending approval of the private street. VARIANCE FINDINGS Sec. 18-22. Variances. The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: VARIANCE FINDINGS WITHIN SUBDIVISONS The city may grant a variance from the regulations of the subdivision ordinance as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. Finding: The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. The proposed private street preserves significant site features. 2) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. Finding: The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape and topographical conditions of the land. 3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. Finding: The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other properties due to the unique site features. 4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. Finding: The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance, and Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is proposing to access the site via a private street. This option will minimize grading and tree removal as well as provide less potential conflict with vehicles on Minnewashta Parkway. The applicant’s request is reasonable. Staff is recommending approval of this request. Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 14 of 17 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots and a variance to allow a private street and lots to be bisected by a public street as shown in plans stamped “Received November 1, 2019”, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the findings of fact and decision recommendation: SUBDIVISION Engineering: 1. The installation of a contiguous curb consistent with the Minnewashta Parkway corridor shall be constructed where the existing driveway access is located (see City Detail Plate #5203) immediately after the construction entrance at the location has been permanently removed. 2. The applicant shall provide adequate right-of-way (ROW) over the entirety of the trail along the west side of Minnewashta Parkway. This ROW shall align with the newly subdivided property to the north to ensure continuity and will be reviewed and approved by the city prior to recording of final plat. 3. No additional accesses shall be had off Minnewashta Parkway to serve the newly created lots. 4. Covenants addressing the maintenance and snow plowing operations of the private street shall be filed against all benefiting properties and submitted to the city for review and approval prior to recording of final plat. 5. Grading plans shall be updated to illustrate drainage arrows. 6. Appendix B of the Stormwater Management Plan shall be updated to include drainage arrows illustrating the direction of discharge from each sub-catchment. 7. Updated stormwater modeling verifying adequate capacity of downstream public stormwater facilities and conveyance systems shall be provided for review and approval prior to recording of final plat. 8. Plans shall be updated to address Sec. 18-57.p.4 regarding the design of adequate drainage facilities for the private street. 9. An updated SWPPP shall be submitted as plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub-contractors are identified, and as other conditions change. Review and approval of the standalone document is required prior to any grading. Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 15 of 17 10. The newly extended 6” C900 water main shall be privately owned and maintained. 11. Coordination with all small utility companies for the excavation and underground utility installations shall be maintained by the applicant and their contractor. 12. Lot 2’s water service shall be had from the newly extended water main; plans shall be updated accordingly. 13. Updated plans shall be submitted as to not create a potential conflict or any crossing of the sanitary service lateral to Lot 1 with the newly extended water main. 14. The applicant’s contractor shall field verify the serviceability of the existing sanitary sewer service for Lot 2. This shall be accomplished via CCTV which will be provided to the city prior to connection of the existing sanitary sewer lateral. 15. A Homeowners Association (HOA) encompassing all lots is required, in perpetuity, to ensure the technical expertise and funding mechanisms for the operation and maintenance of the private street and stormwater treatment devices. 16. Operation and maintenance of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity. An operation and maintenance plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, and recorded against the properties that details the HOA’s permanent inspection, maintenance, and funding mechanism that ensures stormwater BMPs will function as designed. Construction Plan Review: 1. On sheet 2 of 10: for clarity, remove call-outs associated with curb & gutter removal or bituminous removal as those are related to the installation of utilities and are addressed on subsequent sheets; add to notes associated with removal of structures (e.g. house, deck, sheds, etc.) that any removal requires a building permit; add to notes that any found wells, septic, tanks, etc. shall be abandon in accordance with the appropriate state and local regulations. 2. On sheet 3 of 10: illustrate existing public trail on the preliminary plat to ensure appropriate ROW dedication; clarify shoreline area illustrated adjacent to “Outlot C” and “Outlot D” on preliminary plat, it is unclear if this area is designated as D&U. 3. On sheet 4 of 10: update call-outs for sanitary sewer taps to incorporate “WYE” and not “SADDLE”, update call-outs for removal and replacement of curb & gutter and bituminous to identify the appropriate city detail plate numbers; Note 5 shall be updated read “…shall be PE/PEX” and not copper, (the city specifications and plates are being updated to incorporate no use of copper for water service laterals; detail plates and specifications can be provided upon request); Note 6 should updated to address the need for a city Underground Utility Permit (ROW permit); Note 8 correctly addresses City Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 16 of 17 Code regarding the location of the curb stop at the property line, however the plans illustrate the curb stop at the D&U line, update plans accordingly; Note 9 should be updated to incorporate the same requirement for water services (painted blue); Note 10 should be updated to incorporate language that tracer while shall meet city specifications, also the notes are overlaid with another label and are illegible, update accordingly; add a note to the effect that testing requirements for water main installation shall meet city requirements and specifications, and that the coordination of testing (bacteria, pressure, etc.) are to be coordinated with the Public Works Utility Department (952-227-1130). 4. On sheet 5 of 10: the call-out for the construction of the private drive entrance at Country Oaks Drive shall include detail plate #5206 which will require the detail sheet to be updated accordingly; construction of the private street and other utilities may encroach into abutting properties, update the plans to incorporate notes for protection of private property and private structures/landscaping or if a temporary construction easement is required; provide a typical street detail that adequately addresses the 7-ton design requirement; EOF should be shown, profile details for the EOF and storm pond shall be provided with elevations, include the OCS within the storm pond detail; either update Note 1 so that Class 5 RCP is utilized, or eliminate entirely as no RCP is proposed; add note that an Underground Utility Permit (ROW permit) is required for the connection to the existing catch basin. 5. On sheet 6 of 10: illustrate the locations of all borings referenced in the geotechnical report; illustrate drainage arrows for proposed elevations and grades; include in the legend a detail for the house pad call-outs (G, TF, LL, WO) for clarity; show benchmark location and elevation; include first floor elevations of buildings on adjacent lots (i.e. the lot and building to the south); include existing and proposed elevations at the following locations – each lot corner, top of curb or centerline of roadway at each lot line extension, center of proposed driveway at curb, grade at corners of proposed structure. 6. On Sheet 7 of 10: identify proposed stockpile locations; under the call-out for the silt fence around pond, direct contractor to sheet 10 for additional notes on installation and stabilization of pond; provide detail number for construction entrance call-out; all construction access will be had through one approved construction entrance, thus the silt fence on the northwest corner of the site should be contiguous (no gap), provide a second phase of the erosion control plan for when the construction access off Minnewashta Parkways is closed and stabilized per Engineering Condition (1.) and the construction entrance at the northwest corner is active. 7. On sheet 10 of 10: Update General Grading Note 9 that haul routes shall be supplied to the city for review prior to grading and that there will be no hauling during road restrictions unless reviewed and approved by the city; update General Grading Note 20 that the city’s Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, shall be notified 24-hours prior to commencement of dewatering activities; update Erosion/Siltation Control Note 11 to eliminate “Contractor shall place Mirafi fabric and gravel over all catch basins…”, if inlet protection is required it should meet the city specifications and detail plates (catch basin sediment trap #5302A). Planning Commission Boylan Shores December 3, 2019 Page 17 of 17 Parks: 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for two of the three lots. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current single-family park fee rate of $5,800 per dwelling, the total park fees would be $ 11,600. Environmental Resources Coordinator: 1. No required landscape plantings shown on the approved landscape plan may be planted in any of the outlots. 2. Tree planting requirements on each lot are as follows: Lot 1 – 10 overstory deciduous, 8 evergreens; Lot 2 – 3 deciduous overstory, 5 evergreens; Lot 3 – 5 deciduous overstory, 3 evergreens. 3. Any tree removal on Outlot C or D shall be replaced 2:1 diameter inches on the same outlot. 4. Tree preservation fencing must be installed around trees proposed to be saved prior to any construction activities. Planning: 1. Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the applicant securing the segment of property, to allow the applicant to achieve a 30-foot frontage on a public ROW off of Country Oaks Drive and the City Council approving the transfer of Outlot B of Glendale Homes Drive Subdivision from the city to the applicant. 2. The applicant shall combine Outlot C with Lot 3 and Outlot D with Lot 2. ATTACHMENTS 1. Findings of Fact. 2. Development Review Application. 3. Preliminary Plat Sheets stamped “Received November 1, 2019”. 4. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing List. g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-17 6760 minnewashta pkwy sub and var\staff report preliminary final.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION IN RE: Application of Laketown Builders for Subdivision approval. On December 3, 2019, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Boylan Shores for preliminary plat approval of property into three lots and four outlots. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed subdivision preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential - RSF. 2. The property is guided in the Land Use Plan for Low Density Residential. 3. The legal description of the property is: See Attached Exhibit A 4. The Subdivision Ordinance directs the Planning Commission to consider seven possible adverse affects of the proposed subdivision. The seven affects and our findings regarding them are: SUBDIVISION FINDINGS a. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the zoning ordinance; Finding: The subdivision meets all the requirements of the RSF, Residential Single- Family District and the zoning ordinance if the conditions of approval are met. b. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable city, county and regional plans including but not limited to the city's comprehensive plan; Finding: The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and subdivision ordinance if the conditions of approval are met. c. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, and stormwater drainage are suitable for the proposed development; Finding: The proposed site is suitable for development subject to the conditions specified in this report. d. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, sewage disposal, streets, erosion control and all other improvements required by this chapter; Finding: The proposed subdivision will provide adequate urban infrastructure subject to the conditions specified in this report. e. The proposed subdivision will not cause environmental damage; Finding: The proposed subdivision will not cause significant environmental damage subject to conditions of approval. The proposed subdivision contains adequate open areas to accommodate house pads. f. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record; and Finding: The proposed subdivision will not conflict with existing easements, but rather will expand and provide all necessary easements. g. The proposed subdivision is not premature. A subdivision is premature if any of the following exists: 1) Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. 2) Lack of adequate roads. 3) Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. 4) Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. Finding: The proposed subdivision will have access to public utilities and streets if the specified conditions of approval are met. VARIANCE FINDINGS VARIANCE Section 18-57. Streets. (r) Private streets serving up to four (4) lots may be permitted in the A2, RR, RSF and R4 if the criteria in variance section 18-22 are met and upon consideration of the following: (1) The prevailing development pattern makes it unfeasible or inappropriate to construct a public street. In making this determination, the city may consider the location of existing property lines and homes, local or geographic conditions and the existence of wetlands. (2) After reviewing the surrounding area, it is concluded that an extension of the public street system is not required to serve other parcels in the area, improve access, or to provide a street system consistent with the comprehensive plan. (3) The use of a private street will permit enhanced protection of the city's natural resources, including wetlands and protected areas. Sec. 18-22. Variances. The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: VARIANCE FINDINGS WITHIN SUBDIVISONS The city may grant a variance from the regulations of the subdivision ordinance as part of the plat approval process following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. Finding: The hardship is not a mere inconvenience. The proposed private street preserves significant site features. 2) The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape or typographical conditions of the land. Finding: The hardship is caused by the particular physical surroundings, shape and topographical conditions of the land. 3) The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other property. Finding: The conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applicable to other properties due to the unique site features. 4) The granting of the variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The granting of a variance will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purpose and intent of this chapter, the zoning ordinance, and Comprehensive Plan. The applicant is proposing to access the site via a private street. This option will minimize grading and tree removal as well as provide less potential conflict with vehicles on Minnewashta Parkway. The applicant’s request is reasonable. Staff is recommending approval of this request. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 3rd day of December 2019. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY: Steven Weick g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-17 6760 minnewashta pkwy sub and var\findings of fact.docx COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTTENT Phnning Division - 7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (9521 227-1300 / Far (952) ZZt-1110 CffiOTCHAI{HASSIil APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Submittal Oare: I I pcoate: l2/.r/r9 CCOate:l EO 60oay Review oare:lJl3r lrg (Rebr b 0E amrryEte Arft&€t*n CrE,d&sl fu ,E,qutB<f srrbfiif€t ifibi,./ttlt*r, tM rnud @t t.f,,t y tii! @*n) E ComprBhensive Plan Amendment....................... LJ Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers... $600 $100 E Subdiyision (SUB) El Create 3 lots or tess $300I Create over 3 lots.,-.........$600 + $15 per lot $325 $425 D Metes & Bounds { lc[s) (2 lots).........-.$300 Consolidate Lots............-..$ ls0 fl qterim Use Permit (lUP) Ll ln conjunction with Single.Family Residence.. 9325U All Others........ ................... $42S Final P|at.......................-.$700 E Rezoning (REZ) ! Planned Unit Devet opment (PUD) ....,. $7s0 ..... $100 ..... $500 Minor Amendment to existing PUD All Others. E Sign Plan Review............................ n Site etan Review (SpR) Ll Administrative. ! Commerciaulndustrial Districlsr ... s150 $ 100 $s00 Plus $'10 pe|l,000 square feet of building area:( thousand square feet) 'lndude number of ax6{t o ernployees: _hdude nurbef of nEq employess:Ll Residsntial Disricts......................................... OSOO Plus 95 per dwelling unit ( units) El Property Owners' List within 5OO' (city ro generaie afier pre-app{ication n€ering).....gZiia $3 per address E Escrow for Recording Oocuments (check allthat LJ Conditional Use Permit! VacationD Metes & Bounds SubdMsion (3 docs.) resses) applv)...........................I tnterin Us€ Pemit D Variance ....................... $50 per docurnent! Site Phn agree.n€ntE UteUanO nEration Permitn Easements ( easements)fl oeeos TOTAL FEE Description of Proposal: Three lot residential subdivision- Property Address or Location: _ 6760 MinnelvashE Parkway Parcel#: 250051600 Legal Description: See Atuached wetlands Present? ! Yes U NoTotal Acreage: Present Zoning 2.70 Single-Family Residentiat District (RS F)Requested Zoning Single-Family Residentiat District (RSF) Present Land Use Desig n"gon. Residential Low Density Requested Land Use Designation Single Family Home Application Type (check all that a pplv) Section 2: Required lnformation GCANIIgD Residential Low Density Snl 9c {ott-r-r E Conditional Use Permit (Cup) E Singte-Famity ResiOlnce i. . .... . ... ....Ll All Others........ (lnclud6 9450 escrow for attomey costs). 'Additihal escrq* m.y be ,equicd fo. other ap9[catiorls through tlle developrneit contrad. E Vacaton of Easernenb/Rtlht-of-way (VAC). ....._ g3OO (Additirnal eco.dirE fees may apply) Ef Variance (VAR).................................................... $200. D Wetland Alteration permit (WAp)Ll Single-Family Residence............................... $1SOLl Afl Others........ .................$27s E ZoningAppeat ........................ $i00 D Zonang Ordinance Amendment (ZOA)................. $5OO !gIE: Wh.n mulEde +pllc.tiorl3 arr proce.sod comunDnoy, the .pproplilb Ee sh.ll be clE g.d for o.ch .ppticldon. Existing Use of Property: Section 1: noheck box if separate narative is attached. k) 3{ u N & u- Property Owner and Applicant lnformation Name: lA TatlN BvtLD Address b %Phone: City/Statezip Cell: Fax: Oate Sart*- PROPERW OWNER: ln signing this , l, as property ownet have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that condfions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to o biect at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep mysetf infomed of the deadlines for submission of materi al and the progress of this application. lfurther understjand hat additional fees maybe charged for consulting fees,feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorEation to proceed wih thestudy. I certify that the rur.", ?i,L Do inform ation and exhibits submitted are true and conect Contact: 'R'k Address: J'tj L Phone q{a.{7q lo]1 City/Statezip: Email: Cell: Fax: Sign Date: PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name: Campion Engineering SeMces, lnc.gon1r"1 MaO Campion Phone: 1763) 47Y5172Address1800 Pioneer Creek Center City/Statezip: MaPle Plain' Mn 55359 Email: mcampion@cempioneng.com Cell: Fax: (763) 486-3799 Who should receive copies of staff raports?rofrer Contact lnlormadon: i,lame: Harold UbnellE Property Owner Via:! Applicant Via: Email Email Address: _ Clty/Statezip INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT device. PRINT FORM and deliver copy to the city for pmcessing. : Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORllll b save a copy to your to city along with rcquired doqJments and peyment SUBMTT FORM to send a digitat SAVE FORII PRINT FORTTI SUBMIT FORiI A determination of completeness of the application shall b€ made within l5 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant yyithin 15 business days of application. Application Th s mustn co n an dapp bempleted ationinform na daccompaniedby plans by a licab Cle Ord n an ce rovts nto s.pp rsthityp refer thto afiling Checklistpriateppro na d confer thewith nPlan n to the nanceordiDepartrnents icable raluspecfficapplproced ut rements nda fees.req E Engineer Ma: E EmaitE otner Via: fl Emait ! Mailed Paper copy! ttlalteo paper copy D Mailed Paper Copy n Mailed Paper Copy Email:Harold@Laketo nBuilders.com Section 3: APPLICAI'IT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OI'YI{ER: ln signing this application, I, as applicant, repres€nt to have obtiainedauthorization from the property own€r to file this application. I agree io be bouno by cohoitions oi approvat, suoject onty tothe right to obiecl at the hearings on the application or during thi appeat period. lfihis application iJri not ueen slgned oythe property owner, I have attached separate documentation- of full legal capacity to file ihe application. This appl[ation - should be processed in my name and l. am fie party whom he City sioutd contia regaroint-a-ny mater pena ing ro thisaPplicalion. I will keep mysetf informed of ttre deadiines for submiision of material ant tre irogios Juirc "pptidton. tfurther understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fues, feasiuility stuoL's, Lic. wigr'an estimate prio, oany authorization to proceed with the study. I certiry that the informition and exhibifs submitiJ are rue ana conect. Contact: Email: Signature: Section 4: Notification lnformation be full must all required Before application, determine and z.-qtrr.rJoa=z.==az-=.-<-)c*!irlriiriffiifriiEE,flEiilsilt9!itIEI3:6f;ie 9 snrr. Eli)Z26> 3TEE*aa 'e, > < 2e,2 =ifi&l \J Ha iiitri! EE! i;:t, i l:!:6ilE ; iilEiiii : Eiiiiifii;* ite,EI!9tr!lli rBIto aeBIooz- z z I i I t ! AauJ r!t>oo azzl{Hi- r!6i@J l!l i ,,, iiiii _ao; az< l I ! oirtz7-til:! dtoC\Joozz,tlrcncJ)*o=r!<=- IJJ6HbcEF6;l;lPl o o\ ) E o \ cr"] \ ct oI II \ I I l, $s i I lt \.. \ )< \ .:E !,=l5rr*plE!l:iBqieIII:gEii Ii!i: EEtE 5 ;!itil lr6EE t :!i::a rEiiis:llErl !r !r: EllEs!!.drtlP iiii;E z--tl \ ,>r \ 'v (!/ O_/a_- ----{ !eIEir.EEll o&-o x<;E : r lli'lti t I I I I tl tt' + fl F-U)=Lr-lu)zY.zJ= ;lr-It!r Iri.\ t'1tt-l t+. a+. b. l! \ il :, <u I I i!riil!!!l! o.). ii I o i o ;t gt E? , oa r IE s' !'l,,tlI! iti:l II: l^luo s)rvo II!,lil!liilrllil!Ita,;lllI T IIIl1tIIIIilliitlt di,siooIo eo o u Io Io IoIorl60 E T It I o It@ o o o o 'i9Eo o o <^ o @p o o o ilo Jr o Io r6 "io a J; I Jd rUot. d I^ al NnoJ s)t/o atAzaazo(9zI s5L-oozI ! Oatll LrJ(r>ooIIoz=a<9-ulotcoJ ,!l il; :ri;.1, t4 _da a<9 ! 1 I I I il'rl !IJI , t E I Io tq Io o o _l !i!;;ir!iiii!iii,:i:!!!ii!:!!lrs6; il:iil:!i ii 'r !i;t-i;#!!;Ltr it Ei tt z-tr1 I T I II E I I o&o '?oo :IItitl:it li t_. % F-Ta=IJlrJ ZYz1= a I oa!!EffiIil6lPtEiE,:t,tl!E;,i*,,iii:,tt!IIiil!'lirlllIriiltt!I!tIII{lir fl E i I !i :t5!N(J ! r..It,Ei |-. l L I I -t f- ) i I I I I I I )t\-lt '! III1 : g I II o t o_ l^t80 s)rvo l81Nn0f, ==E aoa z ! !t r ?lit i!ili: !!ti-r! O!,tIJ LIJE>oofIozzl<PJfioa(oJ !! (,q _d6 i ! it ;41 -v ))I I ( I rl il I I I -! t II I I I :t L ) z.-fl 06 "% "% ) I I I -za , i5 E I 5 EI Ee gi ;9 5! a! lltuc slvo lurno$ ;I!Irl!it fi iii iiii ili !i! riiri i lii i! iiiilli iti iiil !!i !!! ifili'lliii lii offiaI!i{i;fu,8*,,!lii,iIItII! tl IEIIil+l!!tr li; Iq! r rri|lltl1!lll llllrl F.r .! ! N I I t- 1 Ed,H I,I! I I I I I I I I I ) , I i I E 1 I i t; EI I i 1 L I IEz=.odI ii'*ii u)a uJ u.rtr2ooIIaz27.<s,t l'-. o<ao -J o9 _Ed; f ^)) zqF-a=LrJuJ z.Y.z1= ,E t;!IlllL !iftirr;itI.:I!imo-!Ifir rr t: !iiirrrl Ir!ii!II.E;rl:iil!ir!!rEIIIIIIIIiiiliTErBilillilir , E El lr :i !t ,: t;ti !r E' ! ! 9 [- l- I t fil d{ t , IL I rs I I I I I I I ll tiE 'I -Irrmf.-lA80 sv\o ltttlnof, Godud&fi==d,o aeBLIooz- il,iiil OalLl LiJt2ooIIozzl 5H6i.or I aEg It ! i '% n"r* I I I N F.IIi'lkt.l"I,)f..It"II I ) I ) I I I i I I I \ z_q ,r. "/e F-a=LalLnzYzJ= I ft; b ;t , IE i EIiIt!lrllr}iiitllr.l!ll' r rlrr: r Fl*iiilr ioIritu!!ilril+ttl,rr,ilir Ji++t++r iii, .J t '{ L tl^ruo s)lvo A8lNnof, 157ooEzzt IaaLIooz r! Oa tlJ urt>ooIfaz-l3P>-o?toJ i,, iiir a ! i )IIIII J\II I l u\ ) \ N \ I I D. :t . ? a I !ILi,!EmIiitIIHIlrls'rllN irl N II -dot c=zq o&n -V,. t1s "% t--U)=t!t!zYZ1= ) I I .:: ;Ttliilr, E;E[Il'mlri[!,:,rElit r ,.fl1*.a EEIIii?dlEii! fu,Er;,,iiIIHtiil!tI!II ; lr.lI t5:E C r9rH g EiFE E siiu II!II T IIIIfiir i+il !)II I t\.' ii!, lt o I l^r0 srvo lulNnoc ,.. siieqzir=i aroozt = t fril ll!! Oalll r!tr= ?eozzl 5H 6XCor i i H ir I t: !r o9 _a li6U3 I I I Ii )\J\f..It.IIE \ I )\ tl ir _l --T.tllilEtd,il ;co221;o.*1t>:o*i=c I.aIocizI E !,Hil L! oIz3oF TTJY J !l o9 -A oi 5Br1E<< I a LtltroIazI d) I Il i rl a ?.- =-3 I ,'i,l ".d ! tl ( I fI E I 7:.':l II \I r. I r iii,fiii!.Iir il lktit!;iiii!i rl;t| ,-- eE * iEts : ?'e 6E. Esfl.- I Irar!r;-: ! :!l! : iiii i ilii! ;:! i ;ili. i iii;,;i!!i:;l: ilti!:i ! i A: Eg * I gc 13 I ! \ I :t ii JI*I E =ZEE * ,.Ii ri ,it II di R---'-1ml rr,rr!rrrt r l8tfr lii .ril,:r,i _::r!! iii I::ii -!tt:t I di EE * <-EA T E3 ] tIt tI l iiI!it lt i: lr ta i I : ; ! ii : t T,'?!l: ,t3 lii r!a,;I; ' :i!iiil!tirr rili! it!iIrr;.:tri; "ir:l.i:t--- - lil !:i E E E E E r Eg ..} a tt!Itt rtri!:!ri5lr!rli :i!i :i;t :: II iiit rl!l J:I I 7II II: I T v- iii i;!:t! ra: r:.! rlE !I:iti ;I ri iki i: illl i :l iiiltiii; I :-ta :iiit! I,, ,! 6 nzr.?i E 6.j-'zAz III ,:tir !i iilii !fiii 6iar !. itt EE:s!t r!;iii li F "' -t =EE- * I ?o eBL-ooz- ul oIz BoF LJJY 5 l!l = t zi' dz J t? I; '1t--:----i-,-+ ) I (, \- i;!E!:! EilIE: iriil: :i!!!i EiiEii:: ts EE *I E =4E-= i!iiiiiiituiii:iiiilii*lllllifi iil I E EE * l!AEErlt ii!: ;il3 rfu! l.l: ilfi !EE! sEit at i iril !!il !l:; iiIE :fii llii, IEE!I ,ai!, fu! iiii!i#! V !!fiiii I iiii!!iilii$iiiili!! I I E =] E E= I .} =E ! E i ilii!l!!$! iiii li$liift I!lii ill!i*iiiiilidilir ffi aiat!Iilllt: !tttcl:! lqrll ti!rtE rtr ** ozo !,fii1 Oalu lr.Jt2ooIIoz73 5HoeCOJ l!l _86 a t , I l i ,) , 5: I t ! 1 ! { l3!tl3itE E!' ,Et Ioc,zt Oa E E:. azlQ zZiig5 toJ .Jz1(!a!o-oaozI ozFI ,l itti i! ri IIiiil i i .ffNl*Il .Birdii il J iZ d I B !t .! ittu rt ;: . --ilii:-il i:;iti;i; 1$ll * I I! Il( I ,l, I d I rii;Liir ir 3 I I : ri,irl I I r iiiiiiliiii lt II Ii ltl\| i i,. E t E , ! if i; I I I fu t ]! _t II IE ;t riili'illlili'i' lllllfili ffiifiilfil'lff, trlriirilIiiii .lir Ir !l{l i!liII i I ;! { i It III ! i,t 1 ; t I I it I Ii!irl lE rl I I t ! 1 t I I , tI !I a li TI it rl I! ttt! ii iili !l J}t!ti .I ii II! t I !:ilIriiliiiii::i,t!IIIt!I rriil 'i 'l I i, ilil iiiiii,r !i r iii fffi-a I ! r!I iri .! ti CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER & HENNEPIN COUNTIES NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING CASE NO. 2019-17 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Blvd. The purpose of this hearing is to consider a request for subdivision approval to create three single-family lots and four outlots with variances for property located at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway. Zoned Single-Family Residential District (RSF). Applicant: Harold Worrell A plan showing the location of the proposal is available for public review on the city’s web site at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2019-17 or at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. Sharmeen Al-Jaff Senior Planner Email: SAl-Jaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Phone: 952-227-1134 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on November 21, 2019) g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-17 6760 minnewashta pkwy sub and var\ph notice to villager.docx CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on November 21,2019, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing to consider a request for subdivision approval to create three single-family lots and four outlots with variances located at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway, Planning Case No. 2019-17 to the persons named on attached Exhibit"A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. HUVIICA . Kim T Meuwissen, Depu C rk Subscribed and sworn to before me this (81- day of IVOL,cry.tx 2019. S,y-Nly\k`.71.,,k ---i?Notary Public 1) JEAN M STECKLING zy I Notary PubNo-M s v % y My oaiaMMon ExpIwe den 91,2024 co r_.. 0 O G> fn m w d d t ° C N N U •> Y SSS (0 y o iiiiiiic.D a E 73 N U d ma) ' O 0 c 0) . - 1_ U O 0 mo12 8om mmam lrm m C C) O O ;_., .O+. c ' d O N r .N my >c m E a) t U co p>. 0) O 0_ 0) 0 0) U O • • 3 > • U . Q O ° E o v E° E o E `m m c > ti D U O E N O U c (n N E 13 . O N (7 mU o, t gcs vmUE m- moc 0- c.0 01 H o CO N (0 V O 'er p L U 0" U 0) O ".• c = c O d 'd N a c''a dor=8?1-°0 as 0 m LNom,,O 0) ' N TU 0) U • E.E Earcm mmUvt"a r.+ c a N p ^ O .0 = O L O- c E E 4- U O y'... U S co C F) m c c E m N o o m asN aci 3 3 0 C O L I- > .. T C O c c 0) 2 C 0_ O C U (0 0) (d a) d a c d« c U u o U r u a o d • , Q O co Y 0 0 U N O 03 0) (n L L Amo o v" a3mUm ma O Q S U . 7.E., .(1) = = "Q O 0) L ^ 0 .0 (n O O > 3 u«" a° ncJ m° o« ° o= 00 c 2 c 3 Ct p ' .N cC"C"U ".-. "-. r 0) C O "-. ( a d U m m` o a m.m.2L m ro o d o. y 2. d C o 0 C a p M.., +. ". c t, N A as O T (n t C ma cmmrvy >. ao L;t5.-5O) O r- 0)0 .0 U y .c _ i- 0 ".• 0) ' N E o a0 U U 0- 0 d .+ C10 > .rnami o >> 0- cmmvc-5 . °ca0 L .U) f0c ~ >_ 0 HNO .O 3Q0 (0 ANN Q'V SOU O ; +' U cm- Ea«oagctiumd °a°c RS CD aU p , 0 Ty .0 •,,, z N 0) -0 "0 U 0) +: ›, O U 3 O 0) mr iltUnilfiulmtoEU > U c O c 0) (0 ._ O 0) ea a ' -, 0_ m n'' o«c0) O c — O ° a c ulN 0c ` OYV Q EVMcppOUpto +. Q O —_ 0)0) 0) c 0-Q _ 0) .- X 0 ._ o-O c 3 o c-- 0-o a 5°,-12 3 C) N L ` '0 / dL O- 0) ".. 0 c " — d (n U) U 0_ U) N V! -Q (n Um oom ao_. mm U) Ct M (n 0 0 Q 3 U)1 _ 2 2 Ul.7-1,1 a,N a" m C 2 m E c ° m«« F' c C N = 0) (n•0) 0) S o - N -C 0) c (0 - a) co N OS ti 03 r d O a) d m ° m a m E cno- D W m 0 v Is;O c 0) -c U 3 a+ W c U m 4- OS +. - (0 (n . 0 +% (n NS 7 N a) 3 7 "O 0_ O mv calc Eo`-0 ca>>m r .9%0 co U c c 0) >, 0) ( 0 O :-. 10 -Q 0),U c N U O C O ( 0 1 •.- - N E C 7 > v m " E u v °L m 0 d 0) •- 00 1_ >,._ L C N c DO N = Q 0) S , 0) ''.. OL la 0 t S O co N m m y 2E' 058 d m a.2 4 m d o S rna.. 0 `y, N ' 0 —Q 2 0_S (0 0) III V _ '+. aEw com c -= aom« O C (p U . E (0 O a) C E p U t — 3 (0 c .0 c N V Cl) T ''. 0 3cm, co m p 0 o o•y m ai a.2' m m m.m ° an c fc/! >= ( 0 '( 0 LL O Q 0 3 O 0) +T.V 0) d O yo_ 3ERm'aN mEaa'?n« 3aZNQa) c = a) — 0)• .+ C E y 0 c =C) a Q Ct ` '. C O T S O 4) c C) '= 0) N z4, f.) a° ° EE y, o = vom a (n ' C O O 0 O O V - OaI 0_( n U d +. O U 0) -) C E O •" 6" c > .5 c Emc Fim m vaQi.ga E 2 c r3"c „, OC _ (0 (O OL _ a) S O 1 E00) 0 (C • > o'i a.c Ern mEm a o'am in 0 U (n (/) = 0 CO Q H c 0 (n — N C') U) Q D_ U c 0 C.d m 3 N m a 8.g m N a'g1.1; m o S N N 0) 0cmmrm«=aoost« o,vE«oi V 0 (n ca o'= c«_°NLUNoi ag ocm a) N ca 6 amEEamar~mvc'ai1 `mrccc0- 7 L ° c m m 0.--. 2 a m U m 0-0.0 .L _d 3 d ._ 0 C cv mam« dig pc at .0 28428. E_ O 0.Mrr C Oa> Qc mN F3 °O N.O OgCVm c co ' >. c d c c Uacc ` v2 =.5 ' mn.E ' ootmac« N 3 ca.u , 33 a, .a' = avdRG. Q 0 S 0 E Y Ivvadc'm% > nom Eoo c1, Stu4-, ) 0 C. 0 0 Cl 0 4" 0 VI 0 nU` nmrtaEEnaaEm8.g212Qa. 0. I- 1- O 0 d QdCI. -J rro a0 zn. 6 . 0) r aL o c 0) a) - v) w 2O L 0 d d CO N m ri000a c2, my a lc 7 .0 Y T . 1- 4V '-. C mea ° acoEE m ° ' o 0 al as.+ U 0) NC c O0) c v d d m- m a« a m C 0) C Q) m 'U U ' a)) '- p CO• 0) mcaai mEcmY-E Ea r 0) N 0 0 C • Cl)u) a) O 4) O •C U O iO i co Ism t $ 0 1''2°c a c as ECO) N 3 ff+.: _ 0 U C (n d O 2 mmc rdmm >>g mamo N a) U (n T 0) Q 0_ 0) c Q U f0 0 3 > •N c . C. '+. 0 ' EQ ov E „'Es i; oE dE.c > 0 O N 0) c O 0 0) ? _c c E "0 c 0) mmUCOC.Tmo s2- cr L 0 C E -c.' Cl) 0)Q y '.E 0 • N O >+ O) •irnc cs2Emu= i_p 3 > c mo CD m n 0) Q C c o d as c 0) vim- a'a l---'c m E v , c H `y (0 coOS V O E _c '.. p 0) 'U c 0) T U 0) U •.- U _ _m e.3 E m a o v E a c y c.. m p N > 1.. r c O L 0_L U O S E c U c omaOocU«m'- m3 m3 0) E O Y O` j • >' C 4- O co Q "-' 7 E E — c co al 0) (0 d o L' °>. a° a m p aui y o. 2 0-_c (0 0_-c (n ( O` n t = 'L p 0. 0 0U L -• cp 0 -c (/) -c cf)0 =3 u « m° aUmmdo« , Qc cp Q. 2 Q 7 0)r c Q O O > ~moa c.d m=mm N V 0... O) C O p c >i ... O w C D s U) 0 0)0) (0 Q "'. (0 O c U =d a c a>3r1 aac5-« cg C O O0 O U ". 0 O 0)-- C S r Uca LTU d C O +T+ .° m o > oco=c0La `' vc 3 °co `m Lc. .N +c .c O *( n O .c N 9 .c •(, U . 00_ 013 RS N - N •U --co O •Q S y = N U c-- E T 5 N E m¢t b m%oCUNOcN- '> () u) 1) ' a •.-. 0) 'CL C sa (0 -- 0- U O U p _ > t U N -7:2(r1 o2P-00-05`,,, O c U .- 0 0 Td RI >i C4- N 0) N O 0) U O 0w- md MJfla,!UUUQ -0 -0 (n 03 0 , >' c >! S d . 0 mf= U Q 0) N N c 0) (0 - O -0 (0 4 0 0 0 oa c° N .- 0_ — yc m o •c 2 a'm> 'm o m S 0 M E " v- c Y N ` C 1E E > ca.. S) V i —I, M c O d O X ( .O oto o..§ NoE oya o U c d = N aci Q 73 a) c "0 a . tom.. ( n 7 Q c _ 0) U - 3 d N (n — (On 0_ M N •N -D U U r a a 2 w To m a c m E c2«« o ' 1- . la a) U N CO U) N i• N +. ' 0) = t - c) 0 O a m u v a o v m n-. a.:°, - m c O c N = 0) 0)L C 0) - C « "-. ( 0 0) 0) t) c (' ti U z d \ O O c c a m E c . v o m c v a c w m ' 0 + U.p) U O . 1- (0 — .>> c N c Cl) a) S 7 N 3 L _ E = E ctE= c.1t Eom cdd'U amiv v R U c 'C y 0 0 0 ,U (D j p • C O ( O I O V) E C T ca asm .-- 00c- m" ° a 8-0-- n00) o mmmc ca ci+ d 0) 0 L >.= L la C O p as c 0) "-. OL 03 s N 0 S O _ 1_ 10 m« cnmmm2-Ym mo ._ 2O0 .- 0 0 • C C C E (n U) Q 0) = Q Q •C 0.S CO 0) U) 0 Q '(T) co O d d 15 m o a N m m m m ° a cZcUc (0 N O _c — 3 O c3901 m ' d T LEL__ >_ (0 > = c C 0_t ` —N ,U > N U C) N >'' c • Q 3 U \ iq v m b-.2`41-'.° 0-E0-.22'2 § `" 00 N co 6•- (0 y •i N - 2 Y 0 N t .3 • . CO 0) EL 7A• O N O N mcg caa U«c n°. c m o t S 0) r c 0) 0)I5 COO _O 0) 0.,.x (0 0_(/) HUd pE c0 -45 `` sv coO (0 .> > C aN£ r-)009 0 1- -. (...) .(7) (/) = 0UCOQ I- CO CU W N (`') "- Q) Q 0_ QU E N) QQ. CO•) " 0 c > ac' 3 y m a'c.8a2 pla mo c N co 0) ovyd,ry««asrnL« m `E m Op a0 0 (n C m 0 C« O w m U O f Q O O c'm CD c QN N 0-- Eoacm'c'5-.Yn° awe d C d o 7 c Ca caN maaio-aaLcnaL N2, cmcm° a3Q01 c C flU VH11110ccp_) O d V/' r:.. 0) 0 Q.0. Oas OIsd mmm._„ v C O Q O O C t +.' 7 0 W U Ii. o v.c m >L v o m.o o c a y m cCI II 0 «<nUo._v)mraEE<n$ Emc._ CI -I a Qaa - a 0c)z 0. 3t3 . papinoid elep;o asn ci aav XVl»» «zi day XVl»» JO ssaooe s,Jasn sip lo lno asue yolgM sallied pJiyl Jo'slua6e Jo saaAoldwa sll'Jasn Aq ii aav XVI» ly6noiq swlelo He pue Aue woi;Al!3 ail sseiwiey ploy pue'l4luwapul'pualep 04 samba GWVN XVl»»«pJooaa 1xeN» pue'swielo He senlem Aissaidxe pue 'sa6ewep Aue io;algell aq lou Heys Apo ay>ley' sa6paIMoinioe dew s!;11 lo iasn all pue 1000Z) LZ'PgnS '£0'994§salnlels eloseuuinj of luensind papinoid sl iawlepslp 6ulpaoeid au •sainlea; olldei6oa6;o uogoldap all ul uolspaid JO uogoaJip JO aouelslp ;0 luawainseaw 6ugoexa 6uulnbai asodind iallo Aue JO 6uppeil 'leuolle6lneu io; pasn aq ueo elea sio ail ley' luasaidai IOU scop Apo all pue'aai;ioiie eie dew sill eiedeid 04 pasn elea(SIJ)wags(S uollewio;ul olydei6oaJ ay>ley'lueJJeM lou scop Apo all 'Apo sasodind aoueia;ai Jo; pasn aq 04 sl pue'umoys ewe ay>6ulpie6ei saainos iaylo pue seolgo leiepa;pue;leis'Alunoo Apo snouen ui paleool elep pue uogewio;ul'spiooai;o uopepdwoo e sl dew sill euo se pasn eq 04 pepuelul lou sl pue Aenms e iou dew pepiooai Alie6ai e Jayliau si dew sill Jawielos!a 7 • 4 yfff 4 t alApadad r oafgng I7r/ 16 Df h i pepinoid elep;o asn JO ssaooe s,iesn all;o;no asue goliM sallied INN;JO'slua6e io saa(oldwe sll'ies fl Aq ll6noiq swlep He pue Aue woi;AO eql ssalwiel ploy pue'(;iuwapu!'pua;ap 04 saai6e pue'swielo He senleM Alsseidxe pue 'sa6ewep Aue io;algell eq lou Heys Allo all Will se6pelMowioe dew sil110 iasn all pue'(0002) LZ 'PgnS '£0994§salnlelS eloseuulW ci aav XVl»» `«Zi aav XVI»» o' luensind pepinoid sl iawlepslp 6ulpeoeid all •seinlea; olydei6oe6 40 uogoldep n QOV XVI»» all w uo+spaid JO uogoailp JO aouelslp ;o lueweinseew 6ugoexa 6uulnbei asodind Jaylo Aue JO 6uppei1 'leuolle6lneu J04 pasn eq ueo elea sio ay>ley;luesaidai lou 3 WVN XVI* scop Alpo ail pue'aai;Joiia eie dew sly;eiedeid 04 pasn elea(sin)wals(S uollewio;ul olydei6oa9 all ley'lueJJeM jou scop Allo all 'Apo sesodind aouaia;ai Jo;pasn eq 04 Si pue'uMois ease all 6ulpie6ai seoinos iaylo pue seol;;o papa;pue awls'Alunoo Allo snouen ul paleool elep pue uogewio;ul'spiooai;o uolleHdwoo e sl dew sly.•auo se pasn eq of papualul lou sl pue Aenins e iou dew pepiooei Alle6al e iaillau sl dew s!il Jewiepsip its Rpedo d t r pafgng7/ "r ar ii,' I i 1 1,, — ° 6 Q W C7 C7 C7 C7 OLD p p 0 000 0 0 0 000 = 0 0 00 Y Y 0 Y Y Y 0 Y 0 cc cc cc p cc cc O_ cc cc cc cc cc cc Q Q cc Q Q Q cc Q Ln cc cc p p 000 > 00000 0000000000000 Q 2 2 2 2 cc w cc Lu cc cc u_ cc cc cc cc w cc w w w O_ c[ w CC CC U U U U U Q U Q U U U 0 0 0 LLI O < O < < < O O < CC CC O CC CC CC CC O CC 0 W w w w w w p w p w w w LL LL LL LL 0 LL p 0 0 LL LL p F— H. w F— I— F— LL I— LI- 2 Z w w w w —) Z a Z a a a < < < v) < Z < Z Z Z < < Z Z Z Q Z Z Z Q Z I- 2Z VI LA w WCC CC CC W O: W CC W W LU 0[ CC LU p[ p LU LU LU LU Q J Q J < < Q I- H 1— CC 1— J I_ J J J H. F— J O O F- O O O F- O F- 0 c J J J J G C7 .e 0 N vt V) U vt 0 N 0 0 0 V) Ln (.7 U U v) U U U v) U Lil Q 0 0 0 r-1 0 0 e-1 0 L-1 0 0 0 r-1 e-I r-1 0 0 L-1 -1 0 r1 0 0 1-1 0 r-I 0 0 0 r-1 0 0 r-I r-1 LU LO N 0 0 r-1 r-1 r-1 N N ("Y1 di- L) Vl LD 00 0 0 0 0 r-I r-I N N N M m cf dr Vl In LO LO LO LO H N 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 CM 01 01 01 0) 0101 0) 01 01 0l 01 01 V) LD CO en M M M M en m M M m M M M m cn m rn M m M m m cn m M M M M M M M m 0 Vl r4 O N Ln (N in N N N m M M N en Ln N Cr) N d' Ln (N LO cf V) LO L) dY LO V1 Ln M LC) cn cn dr M dr M cr C v 0 0 0 In 0 LD 0 LD LD LD 0 0 LD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V) LD N l0 LO l0 N lD N LD LD LO LD LO LO N, LO N, LO N N N LO LO N N LD N N N LD N lD LD Tr 01 1 al 01 O1 N 01 I a1 01 01 al Q1 a) 01 O1 O1 O1 01 O1 01 01 01 01 I 01 1 N N 01 I 01 O1 m r1 ri 1 r1 r r1 r1 rI r1 r ri ri r1 1 r1 r+ r1 + r r r r1 r1 r1 r rI r rI rI r1 r r1 r1 Lf 1 m m cn M M en cn en m m m m en en M m M M m M m M M M M m m m rn m cn cn cn M0000mmcnMenmcncnmmmmmenrn ('n M e enm M cn M M cn m en m fn cn cn en m en Z LMn m Ln Ln Ln Ls) LP) L) in Ln VI Lf) inIn Ln Ln V) in Li-) Lf) LnlLnLLn Ln V)L) Ln L) Ln L) Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln 2 Ln O Ln V) Ln Ln Ln Ln Lf) Ol Vl V) Vl V1 Vl Ln Ln Ln Ln V) Ln Ln Ln Vl Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln L) Ln Ln Ln Ln Z Z Z ZZ Z Z ZZ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z O 0 a Z 00000 00 000 000000000000000000000000 p LU z0 V1 V) V) N V) V) VV) VV) V1 N V)V) V) V) V) V) V) Ln V) V) V) V) V) )V) V) N N V) V) V) V) V1 O J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J JaIZUC7wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww X Z < cC U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U Q . > < X X XX X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X XX X X H LL w W LU LU LU LU LU W LU LU W LU W W LU W LU LU LU LU LU LU LU W LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU LU V)LO 0 N > w CC CC CC D: O_ CC H Z co Z C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 0 C7 p p 0 p p p l7 0 0 C7 U.1 , O 0 0 0 CC O 0 0 0 Y Y 0 Y Y Y 0 Y 0 0 co m O. cc cc cc cc cc p cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc Q cc Q Q Q cc Q cc w a cc 0 cc pw cc cc cc p p p p i cc 10 ° 00000000o Q J J W J Lu cc J J J J } } } } } } ri cc cc vl w w w w w 0 w 0 w w w 0 0 0 > O Q O 0 0 0< 00 < H 1- 0 = H H O H O O JI ( U VI J U J J O_ Z O_ Z O_ O_ d Q < < V) Q Z < Z Z Z < < z Q Q Q Q 0 Q V) 0 N N < W < W < < < CC CC cC LU cC LU cC W W LU cC cC W p[ CC CC p 2 W 2 W w W w J J H I- H cc H —1H J J J I- H —, 0 0 F- 0 0 0 F- 01— F— Q ,, m F— J O_ J J (.7 C7 e e Ln v) v) U (AO v) C7 (_ C7 v) v) C7 U U cn U U U Ln U (Ay) I N t0 00 0 0 e1 0 0 r-1 0 r-1 0 0 0 r-1 r-1 e-1 0 0 r-1 r-1 O r-1 0 0 r-1 0 r-1 0 0 0 -1 O O -1 r-1 r-1 X Ln M 0 0 0 O Hi r-1 ri N N m dr Ln Ln l0 00 0 0 0 0 r-1 -1 N N N en en Lf) Ln LID LD lD LD LD Q Ln r-I 00 00 00 00 co co 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 00 O1 a) O1 01 O1 a) O1 a) a) O1 a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) H r-1 m m m M M M m m m fn fn M fn M M M enm enM enM M m M m m m m m m m m m m Z wN Q LU CC I— X Z LU Y OJ CC U DO Z Z 0 m U D LU aHYQw w CC cz U w C L>i LU —I L112 r C7 oc OJ Lu c, c_.9 H 2 LL cc CC w z OLL 0S LL 00 Ow J Q W z O_ D ~ W n 2 W LU_, O W l.7 J U F— Q K I 0 D_ N J < Y Ln 0 O H = S C7 0 U w 2 v~) VV)) Q 0 LL Q Z U w } w w w Z J UccL.Li Z U w w W Z Q 0I LL U LL p O 0 J 00 Z 2 Z N Z w Z Y } m CC W } C7 cc 0 LUZ C7 Uc Q OZS V) cN J Y J LU Q J Q Z Q V1 W w c< O' J C J N 2200 ,1— .51— 0 C N cc = C YLU ,, LJ = ce O W Q CO W c7 Q Q G co Z Q O O ul cc— Q o2s Q ccccw N Z Q U Q = W 0 02S Q W o7s co Y p o2S Ln F- H l.l..l O U o I H Q p cc 0 Z I- CC CC z = Z w > w 0 H 2 ~ O 0 2 0 > C7 w a 0 0U < 2 < Q a L%i Y w Lij J Z 0 w w cn m > J C7 CCLn Z CC 0 > 0 p > Q 2 U Z D_ 2 C7 Z cn , > , OZ < 1 > CC `—' O1- o0QCC `' CCaa1aLuoH2 - CeOH _ ? aw - aHD ^ F- J J U) Y G 00 U) 2 00 .e Y F- 2 0 HO 0 Ln U Z w 00 v) 00 J > Y p N 00 „.. H Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 al m r-1 N V) LD N Ln dr en r-1 c-1 N M m V N e1 V) al e-1 Cr) N e1 m N al N N LO d' Ln 0 r-1 dr Ln Ln Lf) V) Lf) Ln Lf) r-1 e1 <-1 M 0 dt e1 LD V LD 0 r-1 LD 0 0 0 0 e-1 0 0 r-1 0 r-1 1 ,-1000'100000000000000000000000000000000 in Il) Ln in in Ln Ln in Ln Ln Ln ul in Lf) LD LD LO Ln LD V) LD Ln in Ln LD LD L) c-1 r-1 LO r-1 rI ri LO ri LO LD 0 0 r-1 r-1 0 r-i e1 1-1 e1 e I e1 e-1 ri e1 0 0 0 r-1 0 r-1 0 r-1 r-1 r-1 0 0 r-1 Ln Ln 0 111 Vl In 0 Ln 0 0 0 0 LD LD 0 LD LD LD LO LD LD LD LD LD 00 00 CO LD CO LD 00 LD LD LD CO 00 LU N (N 00 N N N 00 N 00 00 Vl Ln V) V) V) V1 V) L) LI) Ln Ln V) Ln V) V) Ln Ln Ln V) V) Ln V1 Ln V) In Lf) Ln V) V1 Ln V1 V) V) V) Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N N (N N N (N N (N N N N N N N N N (N (N N N N N (N (N N N N N N N N Ni Z E. CC CC a' 2 0 0 0 0 a a a a a 0 a 0 v) v) v) O cr) O < < < < < > < v) Y Y Y 0 Y 0 I— H H F- H J H Q Q < cr < ' 2 2 2 2 2 m 2 < O 0 0 cc o cc < 0 < < < < cc < 0 H H H O H O u a w w u w O LU HHHHaHLLWWWWWWWWH Z Z Z H Z H ZZZZZHZZ 2 < 0 < Z a Z Z Z Z Z 0cccc 00U U U0 v U 2 2 2 2 2 2 N 2 O o e-, 0 0 ,1 ,1 0 ,1 ,1 ,1 ,1 0 0 0 ,1 r r co 00 00 co cr cr Ln r\ o ,-{ Ln v CT (7) (1) a> Ol al lD CD CD LD N CO CO 00 Cr) m m m m m m CD CD LD CO LD CD LD cD m CDN. V) CD in C LD `r LD a> t\ n a) 0 0 o o o o o o Q1 Ln cr Ln Lr) Ln up LD r-, r N to N to r LD LD to t.o to Lo N N N am r, LT ,1 cr, cr, al C rn c71 0 m m Cr m m m '' m m m m m m m m LD m m m m m m m n m m m m m m m m 00 Cr Ln Ln If Ln In v) Z Ln Ln Ln Ln L) Ln Ln Ln m Ln L( Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln V) Ln U1 Ln Ln Ln ZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZLIZ O• 00000000000000 N V) (/) V) Ln (.1) I N Ln Ln (1) V) Ln V) (/) Ec Ln J J J J J JZ J J J J J J J J 0 JLULUWLULUWLULULULULULUWLUHWUUUUUUQUUUUUUUUUU W W W W W W U W W W W W W W W > W CC CC CC CC Y Y Y Y Y 0 0 0 0 0 a a a a a 0 a Y Y Y U Y 0 N < < < < < < 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q N vt Ln Ln 0 c2n HOOOcCOCaQ0QQQQaQJ a s cc a 0 W a O pHHHWHLL - W W W W W W a ld ZZZ 2 0 0 2 2 LUi) Z_ aQ Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ 2 Z_ < , N- L U UULHi) ULLnU222222vv)) 2OX o r o o -I 1 00 0 ,- H ,-I 0 0 0 0 m N r, 00 00 00 00 N ct d• Ln N 0 ,1 Ln N 0 a1 a) a) a) Q) (7) N CO CD CD LD rN 00 00 00 a) 0 m CO CO CO CO m LD lD LD lD CD LD CO CD l0 r- a Z 0 7 Q 0 0 v) Q N Z a 2 Z < w 0 Z 0 J W O 0 Z J N H o 2 cc m 0 w LU 0 a - Z m 2 Q Y W LU Y D Q a H a 2 2 Q J 7, Z m W } m U < < 0 Y 2 Z 2 N Q Z 2 Z Q 0 0Z$ Z w w 0 a FW 2 a O CCnv) < 0 Z LY U` „x J Z 0,S 0ZS m a U Z J U W Q O z < Q 0 6 5 5 2 U Q• LY °23 0 W W a 0 CC NJ -II- r >- a Z V) W O Z Zz H H Z < Z Q w CC a 0 J L)) 2 F„.. Z g 2 Q Q > U > Z m LL cc > > W Q _i .=.<2 2 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m V) V) d- CO N LD CO al 0 ,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 e1 0 0 e-i 0 r ,1 Ln LD N N Ln e-I ei ,1 CO o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,1 0 m 0 ' 1 ,1 11 LD L-4 lip Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln LI) Ln LD LP) ,1 Ln Ln Ln Ln 0 Ln o ,-1 r1 H ,1 ,1 ,1 0 0 0 Ln 0 N N N 00 (Ni 00 LD LD CD CD CD CD 0 CO 0 N 0 Ln Ln LI) Ln Ln Ln Ln V) Ln L) Ln Ln Ln LI) Ln Ln Ln N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 9 9 N e„.CITY OF CIIANIIASSEN H A S S Chanhassen is a Community for Life-Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow November 19, 2019 Mr. Harold Worrell Laketown Builders P.O. Box 89 Waconia, MN 55387 Re: Planning Case 19-17, Boylan Shores Dear Mr. Worrell: Due to scheduling conflicts and lack of meetings during the holidays, the city will not be able to complete review of your application within 60 days. This letter is to formally notify you that the city is taking the additional 60-day extension to process this request as permitted under MN STAT. 15.99. This application has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Commission on December 3, 2019 and the City Council on January 13, 2020. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 952-227-1134 or e-mail at sal-jaff@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Sincerely, Sharmin Al-Jaff Senior Planner g:\plan\2019 planning cases\19-17 6760 minnewashta pkwy sub and var\extension.doc PH 952.227.1100• www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us • FX 952.227.1110 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD • PO BOX 147 •CHANHASSEN • MINNESOTA 55317 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 3, 2019 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Randall, John Tietz, Michael McGonagill, and Laura Skistad MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad and Doug Reeder STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Sharmeen Al-Jaff, Senior Planner; and Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A RFQUEST FOR A SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES AT 6760 MINNEWASHTA PARKAY (BOYLAN SHORES). Al-Jaff: Thank you Chairman Weick, members of the Planning Commission. The application before you is for a 3 lot subdivision. The site is located at 6760 Minnewashta Parkway, east of C Country Oaks Drive. West of Lake Minnewashta. The site is bisected by Minnewashta Parkway. Current zoning of the site is residential single family and is intended to remain single family. There was a single family home on the site. However this home has been demolished. The demolition took place during the month of October of this year in order to prepare the site for development. There is a driveway access off of Minnewashta Parkway and one of the things that needs to be pointed out is Minnewashta Parkway is a collector street and the Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Comprehensive Plan advocates that we remove access points off of collector streets. In order to abandon the access off of Minnewashta Parkway we needed access off of Country Oaks Drive. The applicant needs to procure what is shown in green right here, this parcel is owned by the City and what’s shown in yellow that parcel is owned by 3931 Country Oaks Drive. There is an agreement between the property owner at 3931 and the applicant. This is Outlot A on the proposed plat. In lieu of access to Country Oaks Drive the applicant will swap land and give them the parcel that is shown in red. With that the applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.71 acres into 3 parcels. Three lots and four outlots. Outlot A as I mentioned will be deeded to the property owner at 3631 Country Oaks Drive. Outlot B is intended to house a private street. Outlot C and D are intended to serve Lots 3 and 2. And just for the record it was pointed out to staff by Chairman Weick that there is an error in the way the staff had put the numbers. The lot numbers. That has been corrected so what staff is presenting right now is accurate and we will make sure that when the staff report goes before City Council that is taken care of. One of the concerns that staff has and this is based on a number of phone calls that we have received over the past 2-3 years, there are people that are, residents of our community that are only interested in the portion that abuts the lake. They want to have lake access. In order to ensure that this does not happen in the future after the subdivision of the lake Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 2 staff spoke to the City Attorney as to how we can keep Lot 3 without Outlot C. Lot 2 with Outlot D and she said, suggested that we go the variance route. That Outlot C be combined with Lot 3 and it won’t be an outlot. It will become Lot 3 and the same is true for Lot 2 and Outlot D. That will require a variance because the city code defines lot as a parcel that is undivided by right-of-way and in this case we have Minnewashta Parkway bisecting this parcel. One other point of clarification that we need to point out. What staff has highlighted in red on the, on this slide. It seems that the applicant has put an area that has become a no man’s land and this will need to be corrected as part of the final plat application. As far as the variances go this application, having this site accessed via a private street is going to eliminate access off of Minnewashta Parkway and staff is recommending approval of this variance. At this point I would like to turn it over to Erik to address storm water and utilities. Henricksen: Right, thank you Sharmeen. Chairman, commissioners, my name is Erik Henricksen, I’m the project engineer with the city. Part of the engineering department. I and the engineering staff conducted a review of the overall feasibility of the preliminary designs for sanitary sewer, water, storm water, grading and public utilities. Overall staff’s review finds that the proposed plans are feasible and over the next few slides I’ll briefly discuss some of the conditions associated with our review. Here is kind of an overall look at the water and sanitary system proposed. The applicant is proposing extension, 300 foot extension of a 6 inch C-900 watermain where at the end will be a fire hydrant in order to provide necessary fire suppression and to facilitate maintenance activities such as flushing the main for water quality. This isn’t necessarily the clearest slide so I’m just going to walk you through it real quick. This dark blue line is the watermain that’s proposed to be extended. These light blue lines are the service laterals for water that are proposed and the green, smaller green lines are the sanitary sewer service laterals. While Lots 1 and 3 are being proposed to have water service from the extension of the watermain, Lot 2 has been proposed to utilize the existing utilities from the pre-existing home that was located on the lot prior to the subdivision. Staff recommends a condition that Lot 2 actually has their service, or their water service had from the watermain. With the addition of the third home drawing from the watermain it would increase the water turnover by about 30 percent with fresh water being delivered approximately every day and a half which is acceptable for maintaining preferred water quality. With just two homes there might be a need to flush the main more frequently which would correlate to water loss and kind of a waste of water so that would be a proposed condition engineering would recommend. No sanitary sewer main is required to be extended because there’s adequate services from County Oaks and Minnewashta Parkway. It would be acceptable for Lot 2 to utilize the existing utility for the sanitary sewer lateral provided that they CCTV the line to ensure that it is adequate and is, there’s serviceability to it and if there’s any repairs that need to be had. Also Lot 1 sanitary sewer lateral that comes off of Country Oaks we propose a condition to have that reoriented so it does not cross underneath, or underneath the watermain which would minimize the conflict for maintenance on future maintenance activities. So Lot 3 they are proposing service off of Minnewashta Parkway. Yes correct. Regarding stormwater as with any subdivision Chapter 19 of the city ordinance or the surface water management portion of the code requires treatment of stormwater for newly created impervious surfaces. The applicant is proposing treatment through a biofiltration basin Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 3 which is indicated as 1P which is located here on the southeast portion of Lot 1. Based on the information the analysis provided in the preliminary stormwater management plan this is an acceptable approach that will provide a sufficient level of retention to meet the city requirements with the impervious area as is proposed the required pond for volume retention would be required to have 32, approximately 3,200 cubic feet of storage. As proposed the pond actually provides 4,600 cubic feet of retention. Furthermore the filtration media within the pond would provide sufficient levels of treatment to meet the stormwater requirements. The stormwater management plan justifies that it is not feasible to convey all runoff from the entire property to the basin. This is a drainage, a proposed condition drainage pattern exhibit provided in the stormwater management plan. Sub-catchment 2 drains directly onto Minnewashta Parkway and sub-catchment 3 located here would drain towards the south property. Directing drainage onto an adjacent properties is prohibited and an updated grading plan and stormwater management plan would have to be submitted or shall be submitted to address this condition that we’re proposing. Furthermore an updated model accounting for the added volume into the Minnewashta Parkway’s storm system shall be provided and it shall analyze the impact that it would have on the downstream public system. Overall staff’s review that the general approach and stormwater plan will be feasible. These are fairly minor concerns when we’re looking at the overall subdivision. At this time you can take it over Sharmeen. Al-Jaff: Okay. Briefly the City’s Comprehensive Park Plan requires that there is a park within one mile radius of each residence in the city of Chanhassen and in this case this site is going to be served by Round Park. The services available at this park include a swimming beach, playground, swings, picnic shelter, fishing pier, tennis courts, 4 pickleball courts, basketball courts, skating rink, open play field, trails and parking area. There is also a continuous trail system that along Minnewashta Parkway that will connect the subject site to Roundhouse Park. Staff has been working with the applicant for over 6 months on this site. They have gone through numerous revisions to bring this application to what you see before you today and they have cooperated throughout the process. It is a straight forward development. Subdivision but it is an infill development and it does require a few variances. In this case it makes perfect sense to recommend approval of them and staff is recommending approval with conditions and we’ll be happy to answer any questions. Weick: Thank you Sharmeen and Erik. Any questions? For the City at this time. McGonagill: I did. Weick: Yeah, fire away. McGonagill: So Sharmeen go to your staff report. I think I know the answer to this but I just want to be sure. When I go to page 2 of 17 it’s a drawing that was in the proposal summary staff report. Al-Jaff: Page 17? Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 4 McGonagill: 2 of 17. Al-Jaff: 2 of 17, yes. McGonagill: Yeah it’s the plot. Can you tell me what’s going on? If you go back up on what’s on the screen to the park diagram on this screen. Back up to the park diagram. Yeah that one. What’s going on with, to the north of that? That subdivision I forget the name of it. Aanenson: Glendale. Al-Jaff: Glendale Shores. McGonagill: What’s going on there? Al-Jaff: Glendale Homes. McGonagill: What’s going on there? Did those go away? Did they divide it? What’s happening there? Al-Jaff: They have been divided. We have recorded the plat and there are a few things that they need to provide us. We have given them temporary. Henricksen: They have a conditional notice to proceed to start development and grading. Right now they’re just going through the erosion control inspections and flagging any trees that need to be saved so they’re going through their process to start construction. McGonagill: Okay. So what’s going to happen, this private drive is actually going to be in the back yards of those homes right? Henricksen: It would be adjacent to or abutting. McGonagill: Yeah basically the back yard as it comes through. Henricksen: Correct. McGonagill: And what’s going on with the property to the south of this? Really I’m going back to the whole issue we had about a year ago. Stratford Ridge cul-de-sac, that whole thing, you know that frankly which I was against you know doing what we did because I think that cul-de- sac should just drive straight through and go all the way up to Country Oaks Drive. So that was. Aanenson: That was the original intent. That was what the staff supported. Unfortunately there wasn’t support all the way through the process so. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 5 McGonagill: Correct. Aanenson: Yeah. McGonagill: So what’s going on with the land? Aanenson: So now instead of doing it holistically we’re doing it incrementally on each parcel. McGonagill: Right. Aanenson: And it doesn’t lead for the best utility. It doesn’t lead for the best layout and it forces some variances and. McGonagill: So what’s happened to the land itself? Is it going to be developed? Are we going to see this again? Al-Jaff: So we did receive a phone call from the property owner to the south asking if it is going to be a possibility for him to subdivide his property and we said it will require a few variances. Because they don’t have adequate frontage. There’s going to be some grading but hypothetically it is doable and I stress the word hypothetically. Aanenson: Again it depends on the number of lots and how much variances, you know what the tolerance is on that and so. McGonagill: So what I’m trying to figure out is okay, put a private drive on the north side of this. The land to the south how, they can’t access off of Minnewashta. They can’t access to the west. Aanenson: They have to come off of Stratford. McGonagill: They’re going to have to come off Stratford and that’s the only way they’re going to get in there. Aanenson: Correct. McGonagill: And you’re going to have that, I realize it’s not our development. I understand that’s the issue but what’s going to end up happening, they’re probably going to have the lot to the west where it comes off of Stratford that’s going to be, I’m trying to think of the right word. It will be unusable because it wouldn’t even be big enough to the left right? Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 6 Aanenson: Well that depends on again the layout. It will obviously be more than likely served by a private drive which would require a variance to private drive if you do more than one house. Private street so yeah. Skistad: Do you know how wide that lot is? Al-Jaff: It’s 100 feet wide. Aanenson: Yeah so we’d need 90. Skistad: By what 125? McGonagill: I wish there was a way, I realize there’s not. I’m just sitting here going where the private drive you’re proposing it comes down and does that, what I’ll call a T at the end. You know where it comes in it goes to one lot. It goes to the other one. Where the houses are laid out if you could, that line could be extended on down and ultimately connect up with Stratford it’d make a lot better sense. Unfortunately it’d make a very long road and cul-de-sac again for the fire equipment issue. Aanenson: Correct and that was. McGonagill: That we had the first go around. Aanenson: That was the first go around issue too so again you know the first attempt was to try to get the 3 property owners to work together. I’m not sure that they all had aligned goals. That’s always a challenge too and so. McGonagill: Sure, and better economically for all of them right now. Aanenson: Yeah so now we just have to take them incrementally yeah. McGonagill: So you’re going to have the private drive come in and then they’ll have to come off of Stratford some way and so basically they’ll get maybe one lot because the one to the left is probably not going to be, won’t be big enough. It might be. Aanenson: Yeah. McGonagill: It’s just cut up, that’s just my problem. I just don’t, I don’t like it. That doesn’t make engineering sense to me but I realize it’s what you’re faced with. It’s what the applicant’s come in with. It is not though conducive to what I see the other development around through here that we’re going to have for a better plan. And I don’t know any way around it. I’m sure you talked about this a lot. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 7 Aanenson: Oh yeah. The die was cast. There’s a lot of similar areas to this in the city where you have infill development and if you don’t work together then everybody has to kind of solve their own problems and to the detriment. Our job is to make sure somebody’s not land locked and that they have access. I think the main goal here when looking at this is not to get another access point on Minnewashta Parkway so that was the first driver. McGonagill: Correct that’s not going to happen. Aanenson: So it was very creative to try to figure out how to get that road to go through. The fire department’s very worried about you know the private drive and the length of that. That was a challenge. McGonagill: Yeah was my next question. Aanenson: That’s why the fire hydrant’s there now so we had to just kind of knock off all those issues as we went and Sharmeen worked really hard with the developer to try to figure this out. McGonagill: …go down the drive. They’ll just have to lug their equipment in I guess if it happened right? Run the lines from. Aanenson: They could turn around if they need to yes. McGonagill: They have to run the lines from Country Oaks and go in or they can be able to just, and then tie into the fire hydrant I guess. Aanenson: Correct. McGonagill: And you couldn’t get that in there if they were in a problem. Skistad: Are there houses on that north, is there a house on the north and the south lot? Aanenson: Not yet. Skistad: Around that property. Aanenson: Not yet. McGonagill: But they’re coming. Skistad: Yeah. McGonagill: There’s like if you. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 8 Skistad: Well the north, how many houses are going to go on that north lot? McGonagill: If you look on page 3 of 17 you can see the lots. Skistad: I don’t see that, okay. Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. McGonagill: So basically 3 homes, 1, 2, 3, 3 homes. 2 ½, those lots will be impacted. Maybe 3 if I’m not approximating it right by the private drive. Is this private drive going to force those folks on Glendale to come back with variances to move towards Country Oaks? Aanenson: We have houses, I mean the setback is 30 feet in the rear. We have houses all over the city that are 60 feet apart and that’s what, you know so this is what these are going to be. McGonagill: Okay just wondering if this is going to cause a rebound effect from those homeowners. Aanenson: No it’s not atypical so. McGonagill: Have you heard from those homeowners to the north, or the lot owners that this is going to be drive behind them? Al-Jaff: No but also keep in mind that there is landscaping on the subdivision to the north. McGonagill: The Glendale subdivision. Al-Jaff: Correct, Glendale subdivision so there will be some buffering in place. McGonagill: Okay. The other thing we had with all this and then it will be my last question Chairman. Whenever we went through the Glendale subdivision we had an awful lot of discussion about water movement because the lots to the south were wet. Al-Jaff: Correct. McGonagill: And that was part of the reason was on storm drainage and getting the water out of there and how it was going to run and that’s one of the reasons we talk about running the line up from Stratford Ridge but allowed us to do the drainage correctly. This has made the problem in my opinion worst so how we doing, how’s storm drainage going to work off of this with these homes and where we don’t, where we get the water out of there. Can you show me that? Henricksen: Sure. McGonagill: Thank you. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 9 Henricksen: As proposed right now there will be minor tweaks but as of right now from the proposed private drive this would, this drainage would be captured and that’s one of the comments that was addressed in the staff report is it’s unclear exactly how they’re going to be capturing this. Typically you have a catch basin at a low point and then it’s you know conveyed over to the storm pond so that would be a minor tweak to the plans that we’d want to see and review. Or some justification on just sheet flowing it over with appropriate BMP’s. Another comment that we did have on the stormwater plan is to show the drainage arrows but from a general, just looking at it you can generally see that most of the drainage from Lot 1, this is let me just back up a quick second. This is a proposed drainage pattern map from the stormwater management plan so each of these boxes is a drainage basin essentially or a sub-catchment and this entire sub-catchment would be allocated into 1P or the pond, the biofiltration pond which then would have drain tile underneath so it’s going to infiltrate, clean the water. Drain it into a stormwater conveyance system which is indicated by this line here. McGonagill: Okay that’s the way you’re taking it out? Henricksen: Yeah. McGonagill: Okay because I was one, worried about it going to the south with the issues down there. Henricksen: And that’s one of the, yeah and one of the things about sub-catchment 3 is that, and from the conditions that staff is proposing would be to not allow or prohibit storm water runoff onto an adjacent property so that was, so that’s going to require some design from their engineers and for us to review that proposal. And it will cause minor tweaks to their stormwater model. It’s a smaller sub-catchment but there’s means and methods to capture that. In regards to the sub-catchment 2 this is going towards Minnewashta Parkway. The pre-existing conditions, that’s kind of generally how the site flowed in the sub-catchment 2. It wasn’t as large however this entire site will, should be captured and then pushed onto the Minnewashta system. They’re proposing to tie into a pre-existing catch basin in our system under Minnewashta. We’re requiring that they model that flow and that volume going into our public system. We have the Minnewashta Parkway project coming up for 2020 and 2021. That of which we’re accounting to provide stormwater improvements so we’d like to compare their model with our consultant’s model to ensure everything’s sized adequately and to condition it such once we receive those updated plans. McGonagill: Looking at this, thank you for putting the stormwater drainage pattern up. When I look at that I look at the contours. I’m going well does that mean that 1P is also going to get loaded with water from the lot to the south when it’s developed? Do you think just the way the flow is out there geotechnically? And if it is are we going to have it sized right for that? Because there’s the low point, I know there’s a low point down in there, I’ve driven down in there. It’s inbetween there. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 10 Henricksen: Right, yep. McGonagill: And so when they push, they’re going to have to push that, the cul-de-sac north to provide access. Henricksen: I would, no I think that’s a good question and a valuable insight. From what’s proposed this should be the entire sub-catchment that goes into 1P. There shouldn’t be anything coming off from the adjacent property. I would defer. McGonagill: Are you going to have another 1P-2 down on the next one then? To the south. Henricksen: For how the, that shouldn’t lot is going to propose dealing with their stormwater I would, it would be unclear at this point. That’s something they would have to design. I know for this subdivision regarding where the drainage patter is going I would refer to their engineers for how they’re designing it but from what’s submitted and what’s proposed on this drainage pattern map it’s showing that no. McGonagill: So conceivably we’ll have two private roads. Two catch basins basically is probably what will end up happening. Henricksen: Correct I mean Glendale Drive home subdivision had to create their own kind of private stormwater facility. McGonagill: Correct. Henricksen: And because of the lack of that extension the public system that could have gone through to capture some of this it is, it is piecemealed from a stormwater management perspective. McGonagill: And those will all be owned and maintained by the individual homeowners or is the City going to pick up all those catch basins? Henricksen: As addressed and as conditioned we’d want to see an HOA formed and the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities would be of the HOA’s purview. They would be responsible for that maintenance. McGonagill: Okay. Weick: Any to follow up with the… McGonagill: Yeah that’s fine. Thank you Mr. Chair. Weick: Okay. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 11 McGonagill: Just a few questions. Weick: That’s alright. At this time I think I would invite the applicant or developer to come forward and make a presentation. Welcome. Thank you for coming. Harold Worrell: Thank you. My name’s Harold Worrell. I live at 3835 Meadowview Terrace in St. Bonifacius. Previous resident of Chanhassen. Hoping to get back because I’m not the developer, I’m the applicant and part of the reason for this is so I can have a waterfront home. As Sharmeen said it’s a basic 3 lot split. We’ve named it Boylan Shores. By Boylan Shores because it was owned by the same property owner for apparently over 100 years. It seems like we’re just kind of borrowing the property so we asked them after we purchased the property if we could name it after the parents and they were pretty happy about that so we proceeded. This property, I’ve been looking for shoreline property for a very long time. My wife and I and we came up on the property and saw it as a really good opportunity. We saw it as something that probably would not be one lot due to the 5 lots proposed to the north. It would seem like it would be kind of a fish bowl in our opinion so we thought well one, I don’t have the finances to build or buy such a large property and I happen to be a builder so I contacted the owner of the company that I work for and proposed it as an opportunity with a handshake deal for the first lot sold. That’s kind of how we ended at this point today. The property was, the home that was one it we did, as Sharmeen mentioned demo’d the home in October. We saw it as potentially, there was significant damage to it. Some of the block, the cinder block was starting to deteriorate and fall and it seemed like a place where teenagers might find themselves exploring and getting hurt so we went ahead and took care of that. Since we purchased the property my we, I guess the first thing we did was take the paddle boards and down to the shoreline and the kids have been doing that and having S’mores in the bonfire while I poke and prod and pry and cut at buckthorn that’s all over the place. Probable have some permanent scars. We’ve had a family history on Minnewashta for a really long time. My aunt and uncle lived there for probably 40 years when I moved here 20 years ago. My wife and I. We can only think of one year in 17 that we missed Independence Day on Minnewashta so. I’ve spent a lot of time meeting the neighbors. A few of them are here today and just trying to work with them and figure out what their ideas are and you know what the history of the property was and what the best way to tackle this is and I need some help from them and they’ve been very gracious and helpful and we’re trying to work through it now. In regards to, and Marty Campion is here for technical questions. He’s our engineer. In regards to any thought of that become a through road would kill the project. The Dorsey’s to the west would not be interested in a street going through there. That’s the neighbor that we need help from to get our driveway. I’ve never done this before so you got to tell, get the shepherd’s hook out or something. Weick: Well thank you. Harold Worrell: My pleasure. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 12 Weick: Yeah that’s good background on the property. I think what we’ll do is we’ll see if there’s questions specifically for you on the property and then if there’s things that maybe would fit better for the engineer we’ll invite the engineer up and ask those questions so I guess at first I would say, I think you know just looking at your, at your land you know I like the number of, you know the number of homes you’re putting in there. I like the idea that you’re going to have lakefront. I think that’s neat. I think when you see developments that tend to be you know rows of similar looking homes, I think this is going to be unique and I think it’s going to be beautiful. I think it’s going to be a neat area for people to live and for yourself to live. Harold Worrell: Thank you. Weick: And so I think from if you’re purely looking at this plot of land I think it’s nice to see it being developed and to carry it out making the most of what you have. Questions? For the landowner. Tietz: Yeah Mr. Chairman. I don’t know you know Erik you probably looked at this along with Sharmeen and Kate too but you know this issue of the drainage, I’m looking at, on my screen I pulled up the grading plan and then I’m looking at the other one on the screen. Is it possible, well now I guess we changed the screen but is it, the one with 3 zones. Yeah. Would it be possible through your grading process to collapse 3 and raise the pad for the home on site 2? Towards the south boundary and then take part of 3 drainage up into the 2 area? Just through some manipulation of the grading. It looks like there’s a possibility but you know I haven’t, you know I haven’t been able to walk the site with the snow on it to look at things but the grading plan it looks like it might be possible and that might solve some of the concerns that my colleague had with his questions. Marty Campion: Good evening my name is Marty Campion, project engineer. First of all right now the three-quarters of the site in addition to the property to the north all drain south through this site into a low area that’s just a little bit south of the south property line and there is an existing tile inlet that takes that water and directs it, we’re not sure where. When we surveyed we found the tile inlet. We found a storm sewer pipe on the east side of Minnewashta Parkway. The alignments, if they’re connected they’re connected with an angle inbetween that’s not in a manhole but we think that’s what drains the area. Instead of continuing that drainage pattern, everything draining to the south and letting it drain into that what we thought would be a better solution would be capture the water before it goes to the south. Run it into the public system in Minnewashta Parkway so that’s what we’re proposing. And with that it’s difficult to, I don’t think we want to take any less water into the basin. If I understood your question correctly it was trying to direct more water from drainage area 1 into 2. Two’s a, well I shouldn’t. Tietz: No, no, I was just thinking that if 3 collapsed and a majority of that went into 2 just for some re-grading out on the Minnewashta Parkway side and raised the pad for the home on that southerly site which is now I’m confused which number that is. Is that 2 for the building pad or? Then you could almost, and it appears, you know it better than I do but it looks like the grading Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 13 plan by raising the pad for the site and then collapsing a portion, that northeast portion of segment 3. Pushing it more towards 2 you could eliminate, almost eliminate 3. Marty Campion: Well and you can see there’s an existing drainage divide and inbetween 2 and 3 there’s a spot elevation there. That’s in EOF that allows the runoff to escape that way but we need, when I put the grading plan together we needed that elevation to be able to push the water both ways so we can’t, from the south line of 3 we can’t move that water to the north. Just the elevations don’t work. If it’s going to work it we’ll have to look and see if we can even get it into the pond from there. Tietz: Yeah well that’s why I was kind of looking at it because it looks like from Erik’s comments it’s going to be hard to get any of that water from 3 along the south property line with a retaining wall in there to get that water to go to 1P. Marty Campion: Yeah and it will. Tietz: But if that portion that’s kind of the break point is actually raised in elevation then you have a very limited amount that’s going to go to 1P and the rest could be potentially directed around to 2. That’s my thought is the building site has to be raised. Marty Campion: Well it’s not so much the building site. It’s the existing elevations near that south property line in order to try and drain it to the north. So that’s what we have to look at and right now we’ve probably reduced the runoff to that south property by 70 or 80 percent by capturing it in the pond. Tietz: But we still don’t want to push any onto the south property so. Marty Campion: Right and we’ll just have to see how we can do that with the grades that we have there. And just one other comment. We did provide our plans to the developer to the north. We talked to him about maybe incorporating some of our landscaping and tried to work things out with him so he’s aware of the plans. He knows what we’re proposing. I don’t, I didn’t get any negative comments. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t have any but he didn’t voice any of those to me. Weick: Well thank you for doing that. For trying to work with him. That’s, I think that helps at least a little. Other questions? Are you satisfied with at least receiving answers. McGonagill: Yeah we’re getting data. Getting the data. Weick: Okay. Anyone else? No, okay. At this time then I will open up the public hearing portion. Anyone wishing to come forward and offer an opinion on this project may do so now. Just come to the podium and state your name and address so we can get that for the record. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 14 Seeing nobody come forward I’m going to close the public hearing portion and open the item for commission discussion. We can certainly consider a motions. Thoughts. McGonagill: Well it’s, I think it’s a situation where you’re ending up with something that’s not ideal because the die was cast before. Before tonight. Weick: I would say as we, I’ll just sort of kick things in to see if it triggers any thoughts for you but when you do look at, on page 11 of 17 but sort of the findings of the subdivision. I like to go through those and make sure that we check everything because that’s really the crux of what we’re here for and I think it really comes down to subdivision finding number 1. It hinges on the variance for the private street so I think that’s an important piece. I would be, you know I’m in favor of that variance because I just don’t see, unfortunately I don’t see another workable solution. You know not that it hasn’t been tried in the past but that seems to be, it seems to be the best solution in order to serve, serve these 3 homes. McGonagill: Well it’s certainly the only solution. Weick: Yeah. McGonagill: And we’re going to see this again when that lot to the south goes because they’re going to, I don’t know what we’ll see through there but. Weick: It gets progressively more creative I think. McGonagill: Yes. Weick: As we travel to the south. The other point, the other variance and actually I find more important for long term is combining the lots, and I’m assuming. I didn’t ask but I’m assuming that’s okay to set it up that way. Instead of having outlots to have the lot be extended across the street. Marty Campion: That actually is our preference to do that. We’re not aware that, of how that can be done with the bifurcated lots like that but if it’s allowable we certainly will do that. Weick: And that’s what our variance would allow for. Aanenson: Correct. Weick: And I would be pretty adamant that we do approve that to sort of help future proof of this property a little bit. Skistad: How big are those, what are the dimensions of those lower outlots? I just couldn’t see them in there. Like broken out, I mean just out of curiosity. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 15 Tietz: The lot’s over 20,000. Al-Jaff: Outlot C has an area of 10,448 square feet and Outlot D is 9,044. 9,442. Skistad: And I saw that on the chart but I didn’t see the dimensions. Al-Jaff: So they are both 90 feet wide. Skistad: Okay 90 and then about. Al-Jaff: About 100. Skistad: So someone would really want to build on there. Aanenson: Well someone would go onto but they’re substandard. Oh yea it would go. They would go and that’s why we want to tie it together with the other lots. They’re substandard so they would need variances because they don’t meet the requirements of a shoreland lot and so that’s why we felt strongly of tying the two together and based on the City Attorney’s opinion the best way would be to do the variance process. Tietz: Kate would they need a variance to put a shore structure for paddleboat paraphernalia. Aanenson: A water orientated structure? That’s what we would call those. Al-Jaff: That’s what we. Tietz: So that still could be done within, that combined. Aanenson: If they’re combined. Tietz: But it would not have to come back for another variance. Al-Jaff: No. Aanenson: If they’re combined that’s a process yeah so if they want to do water and follow those regulations yeah. Tietz: I want to simplify this if we can. Aanenson: Yes. McGonagill: Oh yeah. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 16 Tietz: One more. I just want to follow up with that grading question. Not too detailed but does the site, does the site balance? Marty Campion: No. The site is short because we’re filling in that low area that’s in the middle. Tietz: Right so my thought of actually raising the building area there for that would actually increase the amount of material you have to bring in. Marty Campion: Well and it’s not so much that. I was just looking at the existing topography out there and we’re really at, in the southeast corner of Lot, what’s labeled as Lot 2 we’re almost the same elevation as we are in the northeast corner of Lot 3 because of how the street drains there so it’s going to be difficult to drain that, that direction. We’ll have to figure out a way to get that to the basin rather than to the north. Tietz: Okay. McGonagill: Erik when you, when lot, I’m still hung up on the one to the south. When that develops do you think what will happen, sewer and water would come off of Minnewashta Parkway and how would you get it to the lot to the left? If Stratford Ridge comes up when we divide, you know you may have a lot to the west of Stratford of the new extension. How are you going to get sewer and water into that? Tietz: Wouldn’t it come off of Stratford? McGonagill: That’s probably where it would come from I would think is probably where it would come from. Henricksen: Right for sanitary sewer… McGonagill: It would come that way and then the water would come the same way? Henricksen: Correct and the applicant or however they propose to subdivide that southern lot there is a possibility just as with this subdivision that some services could be had off of Minnewashta. Something that we wouldn’t necessarily be opposed to but depending again on the orientation and the elevations for sanitary sewer it would either come from Stratford or it could potentially go to Minnewashta so there are adequate services on both. McGonagill: And there’s nothing to keep it, setting a precedent here like we’re doing Kate with the outlot approach and dividing the Lots 2 and 3 with Outlot C and D to make it one big lot. If that happens to the south we’re setting in a way a precedent that’s what our expectations are because they’ll have the same issue. They have a lot to the east of the road. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 17 Aanenson: Yeah I’m not sure if that lot is 20,000 plus but yeah. McGonagill: But driven by size. Aanenson: Correct. McGonagill: Yes I understand. Aanenson: Yes it has to meet the shoreland requirements. McGonagill: Okay thank you. If it doesn’t then. Aanenson: Correct we would take the same approach. McGonagill: Yes. Some consistency somewhere. Aanenson: Yes. McGonagill: Okay. Weick: Can you put up the motion? And the water and sewage that Erik went through are written into the conditions? So those would have to be, those changes that he talked about have been written into the Findings of Fact as well. If there aren’t further comments we could certainly entertain a motion. Or further discussion. Skistad: I had my questions answered so I’m good. With moving forward. I think it’s the best we can do so. Randall: I’ll make a motion. Weick: Halleluiah. Randall: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into 3 lots with 4 outlots with the variances as shown in plans stamped Received November 1, 2019 subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and discussion recommendation. Weick: We have a valid motion. Do we have a second? Tietz: Second. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 18 Weick: We have a valid motion from Commissioner Randall and a second from Commissioner Tietz. Any comments before we go to vote? Thank you all on the commission for your questions and diligence on this item. Randall moved, Tietz seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the preliminary plat to subdivide 2.71 acres into three lots and four outlots and a variance to allow a private street and lots to be bisected by a public street as shown in plans stamped “Received November 1, 2019”, subject to the following conditions and adoption of the findings of fact and decision recommendation: SUBDIVISION Engineering: 1. The installation of a contiguous curb consistent with the Minnewashta Parkway corridor shall be constructed where the existing driveway access is located (see City Detail Plate #5203) immediately after the construction entrance at the location has been permanently removed. 2. The applicant shall provide adequate right-of-way (ROW) over the entirety of the trail along the west side of Minnewashta Parkway. This ROW shall align with the newly subdivided property to the north to ensure continuity and will be reviewed and approved by the city prior to recording of final plat. 3. No additional accesses shall be had off Minnewashta Parkway to serve the newly created lots. 4. Covenants addressing the maintenance and snow plowing operations of the private street shall be filed against all benefiting properties and submitted to the city for review and approval prior to recording of final plat. 5. Grading plans shall be updated to illustrate drainage arrows. 6. Appendix B of the Stormwater Management Plan shall be updated to include drainage arrows illustrating the direction of discharge from each sub-catchment. 7. Updated stormwater modeling verifying adequate capacity of downstream public stormwater facilities and conveyance systems shall be provided for review and approval prior to recording of final plat. 8. Plans shall be updated to address Sec. 18-57.p.4 regarding the design of adequate drainage facilities for the private street. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 19 9. An updated SWPPP shall be submitted as plans are finalized, when the contractor and their sub-contractors are identified, and as other conditions change. Review and approval of the standalone document is required prior to any grading. 10. The newly extended 6” C900 water main shall be privately owned and maintained. 11. Coordination with all small utility companies for the excavation and underground utility installations shall be maintained by the applicant and their contractor. 12. Lot 2’s water service shall be had from the newly extended water main; plans shall be updated accordingly. 13. Updated plans shall be submitted as to not create a potential conflict or any crossing of the sanitary service lateral to Lot 1 with the newly extended water main. 14. The applicant’s contractor shall field verify the serviceability of the existing sanitary sewer service for Lot 2. This shall be accomplished via CCTV which will be provided to the city prior to connection of the existing sanitary sewer lateral. 15. A Homeowners Association (HOA) encompassing all lots is required, in perpetuity, to ensure the technical expertise and funding mechanisms for the operation and maintenance of the private street and stormwater treatment devices. 16. Operation and maintenance of private stormwater BMPs is required in perpetuity. An operation and maintenance plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, and recorded against the properties that details the HOA’s permanent inspection, maintenance, and funding mechanism that ensures stormwater BMPs will function as designed. Construction Plan Review: 1. On sheet 2 of 10: for clarity, remove call-outs associated with curb & gutter removal or bituminous removal as those are related to the installation of utilities and are addressed on subsequent sheets; add to notes associated with removal of structures (e.g. house, deck, sheds, etc.) that any removal requires a building permit; add to notes that any found wells, septic, tanks, etc. shall be abandon in accordance with the appropriate state and local regulations. 2. On sheet 3 of 10: illustrate existing public trail on the preliminary plat to ensure appropriate ROW dedication; clarify shoreline area illustrated adjacent to “Outlot C” and “Outlot D” on preliminary plat, it is unclear if this area is designated as D&U. 3. On sheet 4 of 10: update call-outs for sanitary sewer taps to incorporate “WYE” and not “SADDLE”, update call-outs for removal and replacement of curb & gutter and bituminous to identify the appropriate city detail plate numbers; Note 5 shall be updated read “…shall be PE/PEX” and not copper, (the city specifications and plates are being Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 20 updated to incorporate no use of copper for water service laterals; detail plates and specifications can be provided upon request); Note 6 should updated to address the need for a city Underground Utility Permit (ROW permit); Note 8 correctly addresses City Code regarding the location of the curb stop at the property line, however the plans illustrate the curb stop at the D&U line, update plans accordingly; Note 9 should be updated to incorporate the same requirement for water services (painted blue); Note 10 should be updated to incorporate language that tracer while shall meet city specifications, also the notes are overlaid with another label and are illegible, update accordingly; add a note to the effect that testing requirements for water main installation shall meet city requirements and specifications, and that the coordination of testing (bacteria, pressure, etc.) are to be coordinated with the Public Works Utility Department (952-227-1130). 4. On sheet 5 of 10: the call-out for the construction of the private drive entrance at Country Oaks Drive shall include detail plate #5206 which will require the detail sheet to be updated accordingly; construction of the private street and other utilities may encroach into abutting properties, update the plans to incorporate notes for protection of private property and private structures/landscaping or if a temporary construction easement is required; provide a typical street detail that adequately addresses the 7-ton design requirement; EOF should be shown, profile details for the EOF and storm pond shall be provided with elevations, include the OCS within the storm pond detail; either update Note 1 so that Class 5 RCP is utilized, or eliminate entirely as no RCP is proposed; add note that an Underground Utility Permit (ROW permit) is required for the connection to the existing catch basin. 5. On sheet 6 of 10: illustrate the locations of all borings referenced in the geotechnical report; illustrate drainage arrows for proposed elevations and grades; include in the legend a detail for the house pad call-outs (G, TF, LL, WO) for clarity; show benchmark location and elevation; include first floor elevations of buildings on adjacent lots (i.e. the lot and building to the south); include existing and proposed elevations at the following locations – each lot corner, top of curb or centerline of roadway at each lot line extension, center of proposed driveway at curb, grade at corners of proposed structure. 6. On Sheet 7 of 10: identify proposed stockpile locations; under the call-out for the silt fence around pond, direct contractor to sheet 10 for additional notes on installation and stabilization of pond; provide detail number for construction entrance call-out; all construction access will be had through one approved construction entrance, thus the silt fence on the northwest corner of the site should be contiguous (no gap), provide a second phase of the erosion control plan for when the construction access off Minnewashta Parkways is closed and stabilized per Engineering Condition (1.) and the construction entrance at the northwest corner is active. 7. On sheet 10 of 10: Update General Grading Note 9 that haul routes shall be supplied to the city for review prior to grading and that there will be no hauling during road restrictions unless reviewed and approved by the city; update General Grading Note 20 that the city’s Water Resources Coordinator, or their designee, shall be notified 24-hours prior to commencement of dewatering activities; update Erosion/Siltation Control Note Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 21 11 to eliminate “Contractor shall place Mirafi fabric and gravel over all catch basins…”, if inlet protection is required it should meet the city specifications and detail plates (catch basin sediment trap #5302A). Parks: 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for two of the three lots. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current single-family park fee rate of $5,800 per dwelling, the total park fees would be $ 11,600. Environmental Resources Coordinator: 1. No required landscape plantings shown on the approved landscape plan may be planted in any of the outlots. 2. Tree planting requirements on each lot are as follows: Lot 1 – 10 overstory deciduous, 8 evergreens; Lot 2 – 3 deciduous overstory, 5 evergreens; Lot 3 – 5 deciduous overstory, 3 evergreens. 3. Any tree removal on Outlot C or D shall be replaced 2:1 diameter inches on the same outlot. 4. Tree preservation fencing must be installed around trees proposed to be saved prior to any construction activities. Planning: 1. Approval of the subdivision is contingent upon the applicant securing the segment of property, to allow the applicant to achieve a 30-foot frontage on a public ROW off of Country Oaks Drive and the City Council approving the transfer of Outlot B of Glendale Homes Drive Subdivision from the city to the applicant. 2. The applicant shall combine Outlot C with Lot 3 and Outlot D with Lot 2. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Weick: This motion passes unanimously 5 to 0. Thank you. Okay give me just one second. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Skistad noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated November 19, 2019 as presented. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: Actually we had no Planning Commission items go forward so we do have the code amendments. Those are going on the next meeting so the last two meetings we haven’t had, Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 22 there’s a little bit of blow so because of the election and the like we hadn’t met so. I also just to give you an update on what, this is our last meeting of the year and right now the deadline for the first meeting in January, which would be the deadline would be this Friday. We’re not sure if we’re going to have anything in or not so I’ll let you know so you can extend your holiday plans so as soon as we know on Friday I’ll send out an email so everybody knows whether or not that meeting but we do have some items that would be coming forward on the second meeting in January so, but I’ll let you know on that. Keep you posted on that. I know it’s kind of nice to anticipate the schedule so we’ll let you know on that. Skistad: Do we have a new schedule for next year? Aanenson: I’ll put that out, I’ll send that out to you on Friday too. What the meeting are yes. That just got approved. Again we don’t meet on election nights or we try not to meet on National Night Out too so I’ll put that out so. And then keep us informed on that. I’m trying to think what other, upcoming projects we are talking about. Oh the one that we think will be coming in the second meeting in January, there’s another small kind of boutique senior housing and that would be over, next to Lake Ann Park. A piece of property that was owned by Southwest Transit right in front of, right off Audubon there. About 40 units. One story. Kind of like Beehive. Something like that so that one is in the works so that’s the one I think is probably the most likely to go forward. We do anticipate some changes maybe to the Perkins site. We’ve asked them to do a traffic study. We thought maybe that traffic study might come in this Friday. Not sure where that sits on that but so those would be the ones, kind of the smaller ones. Sharmeen’s got another small subdivision too. These infill ones. You can see the challenges that we as planners. They see our job is trying to make all the pieces of the puzzle fit and not everybody always wants to work together at the same time and people that are already there are kind of entrenched about how the change happens and sometimes it makes for less desirable and so that’s always our challenge that we try to work through so you’ve kind of seen that as we go on this project what happens when you make one decision and it forces other decisions that may, may or may not be good but fortunately I think we were able to make some things work. There was some, a little bit of relief. The good news on that over sized lots. All those lots were well in excess of so that was the win on that so. That’s all I had. I think I’ve got a couple items for work session when you’re ready to adjourn and then we’ll just kind of go into more relaxed work session. Weick: Okay. Any questions for Kate? McGonagill: Thank you and all your staff for the job they all did this year. We really appreciate it. Aanenson: Thank you. McGonagill: You did a lot of work. A lot came through here. Chanhassen Planning Commission – December 3, 2019 23 Weick: I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Commissioner McGonagill moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020­XX: Accept Public Trail and Utility Improvements in Arbor Glen Project No. 2017­05 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.3. Prepared By Steve Ferraro, Construction Manager/Engineering Technician IV File No: Project 2017­05 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution accepting the public trail and utility improvements in the Arbor Glen development for perpetual maintenance and ownership upon receipt of the two­year maintenance security escrow.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Staff has received a letter from the developer's engineer, Daniel Schmidt with Sathre­Bergquist, Inc, requesting the City consider acceptance of the public trail and utility improvements in the above­referenced project.  According to Mr. Schmidt, the trail and utility improvements have been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications.  City staff performed a walk­through inspection of the project and found the improvements are in satisfactory condition. ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Acceptance Letter Resolution Arbor Glen Location Map Lege nd City Boun dary December 9, 2019 Map P owered By DataLink 1 in = 100 ft ± CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: January 13, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-XX MOTION BY: _______ SECONDED BY: ________ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC TRAIL AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IN ARBOR GLEN PROJECT NO. 2017-05 WHEREAS, the City has received a letter from Daniel Schmidt of Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. indicating the public trail and utility improvements have been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and all testing has been successfully completed; and WHEREAS, staff has performed a walk-through inspection and finds the improvements acceptable for perpetual maintenance and ownership. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby accepts the public trail and utility improvements in Arbor Glen, Project No. 17-05, for perpetual maintenance and ownership upon receipt of the two-year maintenance security escrow. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of January, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Approve Consultant Agreement for 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.4. Prepared By Steve Ferraro, Construction Manager/Engineering Technician IV File No: Project No. 20­05 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Associates in the amount of $223,890 and authorizes the preparation of a feasibility study for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2020­05.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) for consultant services for the project.  On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for professional services for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project. DISCUSSION The 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas with a collection of streets in each neighborhood to be rehabilitated for a combined total of roughly seven miles of roadway.  All of these roads have deteriorated over the years and are in need of roadway pavement rehabilitation.  The city's Capital Improvement Plan has planned for the rehabilitation of these roads in 2020.  Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program and site investigations to determine the project limits as shown in Figures 1­7 (attached).  The Lake Lucy Road area lies east of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads built­out between 1988 and 1992. The Redwing Lane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads built­out in 1980. The Trappers Pass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately three miles of roads built­out between 1985 and 1994. The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads built­ out in 1978. The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101 as well, with approximately 0.6 miles of road built­out between 1991 and 1992. Lastly, the Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 with approximately one mile of roads built­out in 1986.  None of these areas have had major rehabilitation performed after the original urbanized street construction (only maintenance activities such as seal coats). The city will utilize general funds as well as assessments to finance the street improvements.  Per the city’s assessment practice, 40% of the street costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.  In addition, city utility funds will be used for funding of the utility improvements as required. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectApprove Consultant Agreement for 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05SectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.4.Prepared By Steve Ferraro, ConstructionManager/Engineering Technician IV File No: Project No. 20­05PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Associates in the amount of $223,890 andauthorizes the preparation of a feasibility study for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2020­05.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project.DISCUSSIONThe 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas with a collection of streets in eachneighborhood to be rehabilitated for a combined total of roughly seven miles of roadway.  All of these roads havedeteriorated over the years and are in need of roadway pavement rehabilitation.  The city's Capital Improvement Planhas planned for the rehabilitation of these roads in 2020.  Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program andsite investigations to determine the project limits as shown in Figures 1­7 (attached).  The Lake Lucy Road area lieseast of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads built­out between 1988 and 1992. The RedwingLane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads built­out in 1980. The TrappersPass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately three miles of roads built­outbetween 1985 and 1994. The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads built­out in 1978. The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101 as well, with approximately 0.6 miles of road built­outbetween 1991 and 1992. Lastly, the Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 withapproximately one mile of roads built­out in 1986.  None of these areas have had major rehabilitation performed afterthe original urbanized street construction (only maintenance activities such as seal coats).The city will utilize general funds as well as assessments to finance the street improvements.  Per the city’s assessment practice, 40% of the street costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.  In addition, city utility funds will be used for funding of the utility improvements as required. Based on the pavement overall condition index (OCI) of the roadways, it is anticipated that full depth reclamation (FDR) and overlays should be considered.  The city is currently conducting a geotechnical assessment to aid in the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs throughout the project. The consultant will be provided the geotechnical report for the roadways to incorporate with the feasibility study and subsequent design. While the preliminary geotechnical information is currently scheduled to be completed in January and February, it is anticipated that the surfacing improvements can be accomplished via a mill and overlay and/or a combination of full depth reclamation (FDR) along with mill and overlay dependent upon conditions.  As with any road rehabilitation project, minor spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are anticipated; however, major replacements of utility mains is not anticipated.  The consultant will incorporate in the feasibility study and subsequent design all inspection reports and input from staff regarding utilities.  Furthermore, the consultant will perform an evaluation of the storm sewer capacity within the project area to determine if additional capacity is needed and recommend improvements. Proposed improvements will address current NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District requirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff related to construction activities. ENGINEERING SERVICES Consultant engineering services are necessary for this street project including preparation of the feasibility report, surveying, preliminary and final street design, utility design (as necessary), SWPPP preparation, construction administration, and preparation of as­built drawings. Staff solicited a RFP to three engineering companies:  WSB & Associates, Kimley­Horn & Associates, and SEH, Inc.  Proposals were received from two of the three of the consultants and are summarized below: Proposals Fee WSB & Associates $313,972.00 Kimley­Horn & Associates $223,890.00 SEH, Inc All of the proposals were received prior to the deadline and in the correct format, and were comparable from the perspective of understanding the project with a few exceptions. Those being the proposed schedule from WSB pushed this project into a two year duration versus Kimley­Horn a one year timeframe. Preliminary topographic survey was another variation where WSB included a full topographic survey of all project areas whereas Kimley­Horn included a topographic survey as an as­needed option ($198,890+$25,000). Staff feels this approach is better suited for the project being the type of road treatments considered and all project areas are full urbanized sections presently. The proposal received from Kimley­Horn & Associates presents the lowest cost alternative from a firm the city has extensive experience working with.  Kimley­Horn & Associates was awarded and is currently completing the Minnewashta Parkway project. Their work in Chanhassen and other communities has been satisfactory.  The consultant contract will be completed on a time and materials basis with a not­to­exceed amount unless there is a significant change in scope. As with all engineering contracts, the consultant will provide periodic invoices that staff will review before processing.  The consultant will be required to submit time sheet summaries verifying the hours worked on the project and expenses.  Staff will review the invoices for accuracy and conformance to the contract. FUNDING The budget for the proposed work has been included in the 2020 CIP for the project to be constructed in 2020.  The budget will need to be reviewed and updated based upon construction cost estimates after the feasibility report is completed.  Funding for the project is proposed to come from Municipal State Aid funds, special assessments to properties directly benefiting from the project, and city utility funds as required. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectApprove Consultant Agreement for 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 20­05SectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.4.Prepared By Steve Ferraro, ConstructionManager/Engineering Technician IV File No: Project No. 20­05PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn & Associates in the amount of $223,890 andauthorizes the preparation of a feasibility study for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project No. 2020­05.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn November 27, 2019, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project. On December 20, 2019, the Engineering Department received two proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project.DISCUSSIONThe 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Project consists of six neighborhood areas with a collection of streets in eachneighborhood to be rehabilitated for a combined total of roughly seven miles of roadway.  All of these roads havedeteriorated over the years and are in need of roadway pavement rehabilitation.  The city's Capital Improvement Planhas planned for the rehabilitation of these roads in 2020.  Staff utilized the city's Pavement Management Program andsite investigations to determine the project limits as shown in Figures 1­7 (attached).  The Lake Lucy Road area lieseast of CR 17 (Powers Blvd.) with approximately 0.7 miles of roads built­out between 1988 and 1992. The RedwingLane area lies east of Powers Blvd. as well, with approximately 0.5 miles of roads built­out in 1980. The TrappersPass areas lie north of Pleasant View Road and west of TH 101, with approximately three miles of roads built­outbetween 1985 and 1994. The Choctaw Circle area lies west of TH 101 with approximately 0.4 miles of roads built­out in 1978. The Kurvers Point Road area lies west of TH 101 as well, with approximately 0.6 miles of road built­outbetween 1991 and 1992. Lastly, the Marsh Drive area lies north of Rice Marsh Lake and south of TH 5 withapproximately one mile of roads built­out in 1986.  None of these areas have had major rehabilitation performed afterthe original urbanized street construction (only maintenance activities such as seal coats).The city will utilize general funds as well as assessments to finance the street improvements.  Per the city’s assessmentpractice, 40% of the street costs are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners.  In addition, cityutility funds will be used for funding of the utility improvements as required.Based on the pavement overall condition index (OCI) of the roadways, it is anticipated that full depth reclamation(FDR) and overlays should be considered.  The city is currently conducting a geotechnical assessment to aid in theanalysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation designs throughout the project. The consultant will be provided thegeotechnical report for the roadways to incorporate with the feasibility study and subsequent design. While thepreliminary geotechnical information is currently scheduled to be completed in January and February, it is anticipatedthat the surfacing improvements can be accomplished via a mill and overlay and/or a combination of full depthreclamation (FDR) along with mill and overlay dependent upon conditions. As with any road rehabilitation project, minor spot repair of curb and gutter and other public utilities are anticipated;however, major replacements of utility mains is not anticipated.  The consultant will incorporate in the feasibility studyand subsequent design all inspection reports and input from staff regarding utilities.  Furthermore, the consultant willperform an evaluation of the storm sewer capacity within the project area to determine if additional capacity is neededand recommend improvements.Proposed improvements will address current NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed Districtrequirements in regards to water quality treatment and best management practices for stormwater runoff related toconstruction activities.ENGINEERING SERVICESConsultant engineering services are necessary for this street project including preparation of the feasibility report,surveying, preliminary and final street design, utility design (as necessary), SWPPP preparation, constructionadministration, and preparation of as­built drawings.Staff solicited a RFP to three engineering companies:  WSB & Associates, Kimley­Horn & Associates, and SEH,Inc.  Proposals were received from two of the three of the consultants and are summarized below:Proposals FeeWSB & Associates $313,972.00Kimley­Horn & Associates $223,890.00SEH, IncAll of the proposals were received prior to the deadline and in the correct format, and were comparable from theperspective of understanding the project with a few exceptions. Those being the proposed schedule from WSBpushed this project into a two year duration versus Kimley­Horn a one year timeframe. Preliminary topographicsurvey was another variation where WSB included a full topographic survey of all project areas whereas Kimley­Hornincluded a topographic survey as an as­needed option ($198,890+$25,000). Staff feels this approach is better suitedfor the project being the type of road treatments considered and all project areas are full urbanized sections presently.The proposal received from Kimley­Horn & Associates presents the lowest cost alternative from a firm the city hasextensive experience working with.  Kimley­Horn & Associates was awarded and is currently completing theMinnewashta Parkway project. Their work in Chanhassen and other communities has been satisfactory.  Theconsultant contract will be completed on a time and materials basis with a not­to­exceed amount unless there is asignificant change in scope.As with all engineering contracts, the consultant will provide periodic invoices that staff will review before processing. The consultant will be required to submit time sheet summaries verifying the hours worked on the project andexpenses.  Staff will review the invoices for accuracy and conformance to the contract.FUNDINGThe budget for the proposed work has been included in the 2020 CIP for the project to be constructed in 2020.  Thebudget will need to be reviewed and updated based upon construction cost estimates after the feasibility report is completed.  Funding for the project is proposed to come from Municipal State Aid funds, special assessments to properties directly benefiting from the project, and city utility funds as required. SCHEDULE A tentative schedule for the project is as follows: Task Date Award Consultant Contract January 13, 2020 Neighborhood Project Open House February 2020 Accept Feasibility Report; Call Public Hearing March 9, 2020 Public Hearing March 23, 2020 Approve Plans & Specifications April 13, 2020 Bid Opening May 8, 2020 Neighborhood Meeting May 2020 Assessment Hearing; Award Construction Contract June 8, 2020 Start Construction June 2020 Substantial Construction Complete Fall 2020 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends a consultant contract be awarded to Kimley­Horn & Associates in the amount of $223,890.00 and authorize preparation of a feasibility study. ATTACHMENTS: KH Proposal City Location Map Location Map Figures 1­7 Proposal for Engineering Services 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation City Project No. 20-05 Prepared for: City of Chanhassen December 2019 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 4197 December 20, 2019 (Revised January 6, 2020) Mr. George Bender, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 RE: Proposal for Professional Engineering Services 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation, City Project No. 20-05 Dear Mr. Bender: Thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal for Professional Engineering Services for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation. We understand that you are proposing to hire a consultant for feasibility report preparation, surveying, preliminary and final design, and preparation of construction documents, construction administration and observation, and as-built drawings for this project. Kimley-Horn is well suited to provide these services to the City of Chanhassen. This Proposal has been prepared to specifically address the items requested in your November 27, 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP). We have not received any addenda to your original RFP. Our project understanding, scope of work, consultant team, estimated costs, and schedule are detailed in this Proposal. Thank you again for the opportunity to be considered for this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or you need any additional information. Sincerely, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Chadd Larson, P.E. Project Manager (651) 643-0409 Chadd.Larson@kimley-horn.com 1 PROJECT UNDERSTANDING We understand that the City of Chanhassen is seeking a consultant to provide engineering and surveying services for the rehabilitation of approximately 7 miles of local roadways. The general areas of improvement are as follows:  Lake Lucy Road Area  Choctaw Circle Area  Kurvers Point Road Area  Marsh Drive Area  Redwing Lane Area  Trappers Pass Area Maps detailing the roadways to be rehabilitated within these project areas are included in the RFP. The improvements within the project limits will include the following:  Full depth reclamation and/or mill and overlay  Curb and gutter replacement at select locations  ADA ramps upgrades  Storm sewer spot repair  Sanitary sewer evaluation and spot repair  Water main condition analysis and valve bolt replacement The City is conducting a geotechnical assessment under a separate contract to inform the analysis of proper roadway pavement rehabilitation techniques throughout the project. We will coordinate with the geotechnical consultant to determine the best pavement rehabilitation method for each project area with the understanding that the improvements could include some combination of mill and overlay, pavement reclamation and/or other rehabilitation technique. We understand that coordination with Carver County and MnDOT will be required in areas where the project limits impact those agency right-of-ways. We have excellent relationships with both Carver County and MnDOT staff to work through any project details. We will also coordinate the project improvements with the planned improvements at the Lake Lucy Road and Powers Boulevard intersection. The project areas include six-inch, eight-inch, and twelve-inch ductile iron water main. The break history of these water mains will be evaluated and we will coordinate with City staff to determine the necessary improvements to the water main infrastructure. For the proposes of this proposal, we have assumed the water main improvements will be limited to valve bolt replacement and other minor repairs. The vast majority of the sanitary sewer within the project area consists of eight- inch PVC pipe. The City has televised the majority of the sewers and found that 2 they are generally in adequate condition. We will review the televising reports and provide recommendations for improvements; however, for the purposes of this proposal, we have not assumed any significant sanitary sewer improvements. We understand that City staff will evaluate the storm system in each project area and provide recommendations for any needed improvements. We will complete a high-level evaluation of the existing capacity of the storm sewer system to determine is adequacy. For the purposes of this proposal, we have assumed up to 500 feet of storm sewer may need to be replaced. We will review and determine if the NPDES and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) rules will apply to this project. We will coordinate with the RPBCWD on any necessary approvals for the project. We will also prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. SCOPE OF WORK The following is a summary of the proposed scope of work to be completed for these improvements: 1. Design and Bidding Services a) Preparation of Feasibility Report We will prepare a feasibility report that meets MS 429 requirements and will accomplish the following objectives:  Identify roadway improvements.  Identify storm water improvements.  Identify water main improvements.  Identify sanitary sewer improvements based on video and inspection reports.  Identify right-of-way/easement requirements for the project.  Identify estimated costs for the project and develop a financing plan.  Prepare a preliminary assessment roll based on City standard assessment practices.  Identify a proposed schedule for the construction of the improvements. b) Preparation of Preliminary and Final Plans We will prepare preliminary and final plans for the proposed roadway, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main improvements for the project. We have made the following assumptions for the scope of work for each project area:  We have assumed mill and overlay or pavement reclamation of all roadways within the project area. 3  Storm water improvements as necessary and at a minimum to meet applicable permit requirements. We have assumed up to 500 feet of storm sewer construction.  Water main improvements based on break history and City staff review of existing bolting, gate valves and/or hydrants. We have assumed no significant water main replacement will be required as a part of this project.  We will review sanitary sewer video and inspection reports to determine the scope of additional sanitary sewer repair or replacement.  Upon completion of the final design, we will prepare an engineer’s estimate for the project. (revised 1/6/20) c) Obtain All Necessary Permits for the Project We will prepare, submit, and obtain all necessary permits and approvals for the project. We have assumed the following permits and approvals:  RPBCWD review and approval o Based on the current scope, the project will not trigger the watershed’s stormwater permitting requirements. However, the project will require review and approval by the watershed for their erosion control requirements.  NPDES permit o Based on the current scope, the project will not require a NPDES permit. We will also prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan for the project. d) Identify Right-of-Way/Easements Required We will identify any additional right-of-way or easements that may be required for the project. We have assumed that right-of-way or easement document preparation will be an additional service. e) Preparation of Assessment Rolls We will work with City staff to prepare a final assessment roll based on actual bid prices. f) Bidding Services We will prepare an advertisement for bids for the project, distribute plans and specifications, respond to bidder’s inquiries, issue addenda as needed, attend the bid opening, tabulate the bid results, and prepare a bid summary letter. 4 2. Surveying for Design Services It is our understanding that the scope of improvements will consist of a combination of mill and overlay and pavement reclamation improvements, with minor utility improvements. Due to the challenges, high cost, and schedule implications associated with performing topographic survey under winter conditions, we recommend the City use GIS data as the basis for the design and plan preparation. Our base scope of work assumes no topographic field survey will be performed. Optional Service (revised 1/6/20) As an optional service, we have included an allocation of $25,000 to provide some topographic survey of the project area to supplement GIS data on an as-needed basis. We will coordinate with City staff to determine where topographic field survey would be beneficial based on the preliminary and final design. The survey will be completed by a Kimley-Horn subconsultant, Pioneer Engineering. 3. Meetings We have assumed that we will prepare presentation materials for and attend the following meetings for the project:  Two (2) City Council Meetings  Two (2) Neighborhood Informational Meetings  Staff Meetings as Necessary – Assumed Four (4)  Individual Property Owner Meetings as Needed – We have assumed no individual property owner meetings will be required.  Weekly Construction Meetings – Since City staff will lead the construction phase services, we have assumed we would not attend any weekly construction meetings. 4. Surveying for Construction Services We will provide construction staking for the improvements. The scope of work identified in the final design phase was used to develop our fees for construction staking. For the purposes of this proposal, we have assumed the following staking will be required.  20,000 feet of pavement reclamation (blue tops) – Based on information in the RFP, we have assumed approximately 50% of the roadways will be reclaimed.  4000 feet of curb and gutter  500 feet of storm sewer  As-builts for new utilities Construction staking will be completed by a Kimley-Horn subconsultant, Pioneer Engineering. 5 5. Construction Observation and Administration We understand that City staff will provide full-time construction observation for the project. We have included 100 hours of construction observation time to supplement City staff. We have also included construction administration time to assist with submittal review, answering design questions, and assisting with design changes. 6. As-Built Preparation Upon completion of the improvements, we will provide surveying to obtain as-built information. We will provide paper and electronic as-builts and tie cards meeting City standards/requirements. We have assumed that the City will provide the following information for the project: 1. GIS Information. 2. As-built drawings. 3. Water main break history 4. Sanitary sewer video and inspection reports. PROJECT TEAM We have assembled a team of key Kimley-Horn staff members to meet the various needs of this project. All of these key staff members are available and committed to complete the tasks included within the scope of work. Our proposed project team is as follows: Chadd Larson, PE Project Manager Chadd Larson will serve as the Project Manager and will oversee all design and construction phase services associated with the project. He has served as the Project Manager for numerous street reconstruction projects, including past projects for Chanhassen. Chadd is currently completing the Minnewashta Parkway project for the City. Erin McPhee Anderson Project Engineer Erin McPhee Anderson will serve as the Project Engineer and will be responsible for design and plan preparation on the project. She has had similar responsibilities on previous street reconstruction projects and is currently completing the Minnewashta Parkway project for the City. 6 Bob Gilman Designer Bob Gilman will serve as the Designer and will be responsible for design and plan preparation on the project. He has had similar responsibilities on past projects for Chanhassen and is currently completing the Minnewashta Parkway project for the City. ESTIMATED COSTS Kimley-Horn proposes to perform all services for the project on an hourly not-to- exceed (revised 1/6/20) (cost plus) basis. The following is a summary of our estimated costs for the individual work tasks identified in the Scope of Work. Work Task Estimated Fee 1. Design and Bidding Services $ 134,440 2. Surveying for Design Services $ 0 3. Meetings $ 9,460 4. Surveying for Construction $ 26,000 5. Construction Administration and Observation $ 16,000 6. As-Built Preparation $ 3,190 Subtotal $ 189,090 Reimbursable Expenses $ 9,800 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 198,890 Optional Topographic Survey (revised 1/6/20) $ 25,000 Our total estimated cost for the Scope of Work included as a part of this Proposal is, therefore, $198,890 including all labor and reimbursable expenses. A more detailed summary of our estimated costs is attached. SCHEDULE Based on information from the RFP and discussions with City staff, we have assumed the following project schedule: Award Consultant Contract Neighborhood Project Open House Accept Feasibility Report/Call Public Hearing Public Hearing Approve Plans & Specifications Bid Opening Neighborhood Meeting Assessment Hearing/Award Contract Start Construction Substantial Construction Complete January 13, 2020 February 2020 March 9, 2020 March 23, 2020 April 13, 2020 May 8, 2020 May 2020 June 8, 2020 June 2020 Fall 2020 7 EXCEPTIONS AND DEVIATIONS As previously stated in the scope of work section of this proposal, due to the challenges, high cost, and schedule implications associated with performing topographic survey on this project under winter conditions, we recommend eliminating topographic survey from the contract and utilizing GIS mapping for the basis of the design and plan preparation. Our base fee assumes no topographic survey would be performed; however, as an optional service, we have also provided an allocation for some topographic survey to supplement the GIS mapping. (revised 1/6/20) DETAILED ESTIMATED COST SUMMARY 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION - CITY PROJECT 20-05 CHANHASSEN, MN PREPARED BY: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. REVISED JANUARY 6, 2020 TITLE PROJECT PROJECT DESIGN CADD CONSTRUCTION SUB- TOTAL TOTAL MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER TECHNICIAN INSPECTOR CONSULTANT COST HOURS 1. DESIGN AND BIDDING SERVICES a) Preparation of Feasibility Report 4 20 40 10 $9,880 74 b) Preliminary and Final Plans 20 200 300 420 $114,400 940 c) Permitting and Approvals 4 8 24 $5,020 36 d) Right of Way/Easement Identification 2 2 $510 4 e) Preparation of Assessment Rolls 4 16 $2,620 20 f) Bidding Services 2 4 8 $2,010 14 TOTAL 30 238 388 432 $134,440 1088 2. SURVEYING FOR DESIGN SERVICES a) Design Surveying (See Optional Services Below)$0 TOTAL $0 3. MEETINGS a) City Council Meeting (2)8 4 $2,060 12 b) Neighborhood Information Meetings (2)8 8 6 $3,400 22 c) Staff Meetings As Necessary (4)8 8 12 $4,000 28 d) Individual Property Owner Meetings As Needed (0)$0 0 e) Weekly Construction Meetings (0)$0 0 TOTAL 24 16 4 18 $9,460 62 4. SURVEYING FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES a) Construction Staking $26,000 260 TOTAL $26,000 260 5. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION AND OBSERVATION a) Construction Administration 40 $5,000 40 b) Construction Observation 100 $11,000 100 TOTAL 40 100 $16,000 140 6. PREPARATION OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS a) Prepare As-Built Drawings 2 20 8 $3,190 30 TOTAL 2 20 8 $3,190 30 PROJECT SUBTOTALS 54 256 432 470 108 $26,000 $163,090 1580 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $9,800 PROJECT TOTALS $198,890 1580 OPTIONAL SERVICES Topographic Survey (Allocation) $25,000 250 "F)³CH ±Lake Lucy LakeAnn Lotus Lake Lake Susan NorthLotusLakePark CarverBeachPark Lake SusanPark LakeAnnPark MeadowGreenPark SouthLotusLakePark PleasantViewPreserve K eber P ondChristmasLake ?©A@?©A@ ?ûA@ ?ûA@ GïWX GqWX GqWX GqWX Date Created: 12/17/2019 Document Path: K:\WSB\Maps\Engineering\StreetCIP_2019\LocalPavementRehabProject_2020.mxd Created By: City of Chanhassen - Engineering Department³CH ±City Hall "F)Fire Station 2020 - Mill & Overlay Railroad Rivers Lakes Parks Parcel Boundaries City of Chanhassen 2020 Local Pavement Rehabilitation Project (20-05) µ0 1,600Feet 0 0.25Mile 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation Maps (Figures 1-7) Figure 1: Lake Lucy Road Area Map Figure 2: Choctaw Circle Area Map Figure 3: Kurvers Point Road Area Map Figure 4: Marsh Drive Area Map Figure 5: Redwing Lane Area Map Figure 6: Trappers Pass (West) Area Map Figure 7: Trappers Pass (East) Area Map CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Approve Consultant Agreement for Geotechnical Services for Project No. 20­05 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.5. Prepared By Steve Ferraro, Construction Manager/Engineering Technician IV File No: Project No. 2020­05 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a consultant contract with American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) for geotechnical exploration and engineering services in the amount of $42,000.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation Project requires a separate contract be awarded by the city for geotechnical exploration and engineering services in order to provide information and support to the primary project design consultant in a number of facets including, but not limited to scope, scale, and pavement design recommendations. DISCUSSION The Engineering department prepared an RFP and solicited proposals from American Engineering Testing, Inc., WSB and Associates, and Braun Intertec Corporation for the soil exploration and engineering services required for the project.  Two firms submitted proposals as follows: American Engineering Testing ­ $42,000 Braun Intertec ­ $37,475 The proposals were reviewed to compare the proposed work scopes, sequencing, and estimated costs.  Both firms had indicated they would require additional time to complete the scheduled work per the RFP staff sent out.  American Engineering Testing is able to deliver the final report to the city a minimum of three weeks sooner than Braun Intertec, who currently is experiencing a heavy backlog of projects and workload.  The schedule AET proposed works in the schedule for the main consultant contract to design the project.  Both firms are capable of completing the required work and both have successfully completed past work for the city.  Based on a review of the proposals, staff recommends that American Engineering Testing be selected for the work. American Engineering Testing’s contract is time and material based, with the proposed fee being a total not­to­exceed amount.  As with all engineering contracts, they must submit periodic invoices that staff will review before processing.  Staff will review the invoices for accuracy and conformance with the contract. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectApprove Consultant Agreement for Geotechnical Services for Project No. 20­05SectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.5.Prepared By Steve Ferraro, ConstructionManager/Engineering Technician IV File No: Project No. 2020­05PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a consultant contract with American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) for geotechnicalexploration and engineering services in the amount of $42,000.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe 2020 Pavement Rehabilitation Project requires a separate contract be awarded by the city for geotechnicalexploration and engineering services in order to provide information and support to the primary project designconsultant in a number of facets including, but not limited to scope, scale, and pavement design recommendations.DISCUSSIONThe Engineering department prepared an RFP and solicited proposals from American Engineering Testing, Inc., WSBand Associates, and Braun Intertec Corporation for the soil exploration and engineering services required for theproject.  Two firms submitted proposals as follows:American Engineering Testing ­ $42,000Braun Intertec ­ $37,475The proposals were reviewed to compare the proposed work scopes, sequencing, and estimated costs.  Both firmshad indicated they would require additional time to complete the scheduled work per the RFP staff sentout.  American Engineering Testing is able to deliver the final report to the city a minimum of three weeks sooner thanBraun Intertec, who currently is experiencing a heavy backlog of projects and workload.  The schedule AETproposed works in the schedule for the main consultant contract to design the project.  Both firms are capable ofcompleting the required work and both have successfully completed past work for the city.  Based on a review of theproposals, staff recommends that American Engineering Testing be selected for the work.American Engineering Testing’s contract is time and material based, with the proposed fee being a total not­to­exceed amount.  As with all engineering contracts, they must submit periodic invoices that staff will review before processing.  Staff will review the invoices for accuracy and conformance with the contract. ATTACHMENTS: AET Proposal CIP Sheet CONSULTANTS • ENVIRONMENTAL • GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • FORENSICS 550 Cleveland Avenue North | Saint Paul, MN 55114 Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | www.amengtest.com | AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. December 11, 2019 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Attn: Mr. Steve Ferraro Re: Proposal for Geotechnical Exploration and Pavement Evaluation – Revised 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation City Project No. 20-05 Chanhassen, Minnesota Dear Mr. Ferraro: American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) is pleased to submit this cost proposal for geotechnical exploration and pavement evaluation services for the 2020 City Pavement Rehabilitation projects in Chanhassen, Minnesota. Within this proposal, we present our project team, our understanding of the project, an outline of the scope of services we are to provide, anticipated schedule, and an estimate of our fees. AET is an employee-owned engineering consulting firm, specializing in geotechnical, pavement, and construction materials engineering and testing; environmental consulting; forensic engineering; building technology, and petrography/chemistry. You can count on our team for sound advice drawn from extensive practical experience. We can help you find the balance between cost savings and quality that will avoid durability issues in the future. By employing innovative methods and equipment, we are also able to expedite project completion - decreasing your cost per pavement mile, while reducing impacts to the driving public. Safety is always a top priority at AET. We are committed to reducing the risk of accidents through training, regular safety audits, standard safety devices, and use of DOT certified drivers. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services for you and we look forward to working with you on this project. If you have questions regarding this proposal, please contact Krystle at the phone number or email address below. Very truly yours, American Engineering Testing, Inc. Krystle R. Staker Jacob O. Michalowski, PE Project Manager, Project Point of Contact Senior Engineer Phone: (586) 850-9717 Phone: (651) 283-2481 Email: kstaker@amengtest.com Email: jmichalowski@amengtest.com PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMENT TESTING SERVICES - REVISED AMERICAN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CP 20-05 ENGINEERING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TESTING, INC. December 11, 2019 Page 2 of 6 Project Team AET has extensive experience in pavement rehabilitation projects throughout the midwestern United States (and elsewhere), across the many phases of the pavement rehabilitation process. These phases include preliminary pavement analysis, mix design testing services, material testing services during construction, and most importantly, the selection of an appropriate pavement rehabilitation method given costs, construction, and available resources. Our proposed team for this project is prepared to coordinate with the City of Chanhassen to ensure that a thorough roadway analysis is conducted, the most appropriate rehabilitation method is identified, and is accompanied by an engineering report presenting pavement evaluation results and subgrade design recommendations. Krystle Staker, our proposed Project Manager, has over 5 years of experience serving as Lead Engineering Assistant and managing multiple projects including State, County, and City projects. Her current scope of work at AET includes pavement site evaluations and field testing by falling weight deflectometer (FWD), and ground penetrating radar (GPR) methods, as well as project coordination, data analysis, and assistance of report preparation. Krystle will manage the coordination of project scoping, site visits, laboratory and field testing, as well as assist with GPR data processing, analysis and report preparation. Michael Anderson, PG, has 9 years of experience coordinating and overseeing geotechnical subsurface investigations, developing recommendations for foundation and pavement design, performing construction material testing and observation, and conducting slope stability analysis. He has led several pavement design and construction observation projects under direct supervision of senior geotechnical engineers. Additionally, he has experience working with regulatory agencies on permitting and compliance. Michael’s current role at AET includes project and task management, permitting, subsurface investigation oversight, and data analysis. Michael will assist in project coordination and data analysis and review. Melanie Fiegen, PE, will serve as the Lead Senior Engineer and will be involved with the review of data analysis and development of pavement recommendations. Melanie is a Senior Pavement Engineer with over 20 years of experience performing construction testing and pavement field investigations with engineering analysis and pavement design. She has previously assisted the City of Chanhassen with projects included in the 2018 Street Improvement Projects scope. Serving as the Project Manager on these projects, she has become familiar with the City’s requirements for a successful project. Project Understanding We understand that the City of Chanhassen (City) is seeking geotechnical and pavement engineering services for five project areas, including: 1. Lake Lucy Road 0.65 miles, constructed 1988 to 1981 2. Redwing Lane 0.47 miles, constructed 1980 3. Trappers Pass (East) 1.64 miles, constructed 1985 to 1987 4. Trappers Pass (West) 1.30 miles, constructed 1986 to 1994 5. Marsh Drive 0.94 miles, constructed 1986 Addendum No. 1 was issued on November 18, 2019 and eliminated Choctaw Circle and Kurvers Point Road areas. PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMENT TESTING SERVICES - REVISED AMERICAN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CP 20-05 ENGINEERING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TESTING, INC. December 11, 2019 Page 3 of 6 We understand the area roadways will undergo a rehabilitation in 2020 and there will be select curb-and-gutter replacement, and some limited utility improvements. The services requested include ground penetrating radar (GPR) in both directions of travel, flight auger soil borings and pavement cores within the drive lanes, laboratory testing, and a report presenting pavement evaluation results and pavement rehabilitation recommendations. AET is currently working with the City of Chanhassen on the Lake Lucy Road and Trail Rehabilitation project. AET has previously worked with the City of Chanhassen on geotechnical and pavement engineering projects with similar project scopes including: Lake Drive and Dakota Avenue Improvements; and Orchard Lane, Forest Avenue, Forest Circle, Oriole Avenue, 64th Street West, and Herman Field Parking Lot Improvements. These projects included GPR testing, soil borings, laboratory testing, and engineering reports. Additionally, AET assisted the City on the realignment and reconstruction of Trunk Highway 101 between CSAH 61 and CSAH 14, which included soil borings, laboratory testing, and geotechnical consultation and recommendations. Geotechnical and Pavement Testing Scope of Services The purpose of these services is to explore the subsurface and existing condition of the roadways for the proposed rehabilitation. Our geotechnical and pavement testing scope of services is intended to explore the existing pavement condition and structure, and the subgrade soil conditions. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Testing We will perform a GPR survey in both directions of travel totaling approximately 10.0 lane miles. The data will be collected at a rate of 4 scans per foot, using a 2 GHz antenna and GSSI Roadscan equipment, which allows material layer measurements at depths of up to 18 inches. The GPR data collection system is linked to GPS coordinates. The GPR survey can be performed at posted speed limits and traffic control will not be required. Flight Auger Soil Borings and Pavement Cores • Obtain the necessary permit from the City to perform work in the right-of-way. We assume that any fees associated with this permit will be waived. • Mark soil boring and pavement core locations in the field. • Clear underground public utilities for the boring locations through Gopher State One Call. • Provide traffic control according to the Minnesota Manual on Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts. Based on the anticipated AADT of the residential streets, we anticipate signage will be required. • Perform a total of 48 flight auger borings to a depth of 10 feet within the roadway. A pavement core will also be obtained at each boring location. • Perform an additional 82, 4-inch diameter pavement cores. • The soil borings and pavement cores will be performed using a truck-mounted drill rig/core drill at the approximate locations indicated by the City in the RFP. • Measure the ground water level encountered within flight auger boreholes during drilling. • Backfill the boreholes to comply with the Minnesota Department of Health regulations and patch the surface with cold mix. • Document the final as-drilled soil boring locations using a hand-held GPS unit. Before we drill, we will contact the Gopher State One Call system to locate public underground utilities. Gopher State One Call does not currently charge for this service, but they will not locate private PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMENT TESTING SERVICES - REVISED AMERICAN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CP 20-05 ENGINEERING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TESTING, INC. December 11, 2019 Page 4 of 6 underground utilities or structures. Examples of private utilities include, but are not limited to, propane lines, sewer laterals, sprinkler systems, site lighting, and electric and data lines between buildings. The property owner is responsible for locating all private underground utilities and structures. Please provide us with any maps, plans and records showing the location of all private utilities and structures. We can provide you with names and contact information for private utility locators. These companies usually charge a fee for their services. Also, please note that private locators cannot guarantee that all private utilities will be located. For the private locator to be accurate and effective, the property owner must provide maps, plans and records showing the location of all private utilities and structures. The property owner must also provide a knowledgeable site representative to meet with the private locator and AET personnel. AET shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of all location information supplied by any source. We will not be responsible for any damages to underground utilities or structures not located or incorrectly identified by the property owner, any maps, plans or records, or public or private utility locator providers. Laboratory Logging & Testing Each of the recovered soil boring samples will be returned to our laboratory for logging to assess the major and minor soil components, while also noting the color and degree of saturation. We will visually/manually classify the soils according to the MnDOT Textural Classification and the AASHTO Soil Classification System. Our services will include mechanical laboratory testing of selected soil samples to aid in judging engineering properties of the soils. In this proposal, we have estimated to perform fifteen sieve analysis tests, as well as numerous moisture content tests. Each of the recovered pavement cores will be photographed and measured. The condition of the pavement core will be noted. If conditions are encountered which indicate the laboratory program should be expanded for further evaluation, we will review the recommended tests and associated cost with you prior to proceeding. Report Upon completion of the field exploration and soil laboratory testing, we will prepare and submit a draft report to the City for review. The final report will be submitted after the City’s review and will include the following: • An outline of our understanding of the proposed construction. • Descriptions of GPR, drilling, sampling, testing, and classification methods. • Figures illustrating final test locations. • Ground penetrating radar summaries and plots of pavement thickness and aggregate base thickness averaged over 10- to 25-foot intervals. • Subsurface boring logs, including thickness of the encountered pavement, aggregate base, and/or topsoil or bedrock; MnDOT and AASHTO soil types; measured water levels; and laboratory test results. • Pavement core photographs next to a ruler to show the measurement. • Review of encountered pavement, soil, and groundwater conditions, including pertinent engineering properties. • Discussion of general roadway and pavement condition, specific potential problem areas identified by the test results and collected data, and other issues related to the roadway. • Provide recommendations for an estimated R-value. • Provide pavement rehabilitation design recommendations after discussions with you of the results. PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMENT TESTING SERVICES - REVISED AMERICAN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CP 20-05 ENGINEERING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TESTING, INC. December 11, 2019 Page 5 of 6 Fees The scope of services defined above will be performed on a time and materials basis, with an established not-to-exceed fee of $42,000. We have estimated the fees for each of the following tasks: GPR Testing & Analysis $4,000 Flight Auger Soil Borings (including Traffic Control) $14,800 Pavement Coring (including Traffic Control) $12,900 Laboratory Testing $2,800 Project Management, Consultation, and Final Report $7,500 Schedule We understand that notice to proceed will be granted after the City Council meeting on January 13, 2020. To meet the following schedule, we assume that a limited notice to proceed will be provided by January 1, 2020 and a full notice to proceed will be granted on January 14, 2020. The limited notice to proceed will allow us to start mapping, locating, and clearing utilities, to be able to begin the field operations promptly after full notice to proceed is given. Weather permitting, we anticipate the GPR testing can begin within one week after receiving authorization to proceed. The soil borings are planned to begin the week of January 20, 2020 and the pavement cores are planned to begin the week of January 27, 2020. Laboratory testing will take approximately two weeks after drilling/coring is completed. We anticipate that the draft report will be submitted to the City by February 14, 2020 for review. The final report will be submitted within one week after receiving comments from the City. Additional time will be required if additional testing is requested. Please note that GPR testing can not be performed in snow or on ice/snow covered roads, so some allowance for weather and pavement conditions may be required. PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMENT TESTING SERVICES - REVISED AMERICAN 2020 CITY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION CP 20-05 ENGINEERING CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA TESTING, INC. December 11, 2019 Page 6 of 6 Terms and Conditions All AET Services are provided subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth in the enclosed Environmental/Geotechnical Service Agreement—Terms and Conditions, which, upon acceptance of this proposal, are binding upon you as the Client requesting Services, and your successors, assignees, joint venturers and third-party beneficiaries. Please be advised that additional insured status is granted upon acceptance of the proposal. Acceptance AET requests written acceptance of this proposal in the Proposal Acceptance box below, but the following actions shall constitute your acceptance of this proposal, together with the Terms and Conditions and Amendments: 1) issuing an authorizing purchase order for any of the Services described above, 2) authorizing AET’s presence on site, or 3) written or electronic notification for AET to proceed with any of the Services described in this proposal. Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by signing below and returning a copy to us. When you accept this proposal, you represent that you are authorized to accept on behalf of the Client. Attachments Project Team Resumes Environmental/Geotechnical Service Agreement – Terms and Conditions Proof of Insurance W9 PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE AND AUTHORIZATION Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ______________________ Typed/Printed Name: ___________________________________________________________ Title: _______________________________________________________________________ Company: ____________________________________________________________________ Krystle R. Staker Project Manager / Engineering Technician II I Background Krystle Staker is an Engineering Technician III with over 5 years of experience in construction materials, geotechnical engineering, and pavement engineering. Her expertise includes performing field investigations and engineering analysis for pavement and roadway infrastructure projects. Education Bachelor of Science in Geology Minor in Applied Geophysics Michigan Technological University, 2014 Registrations/Certifications MnDOT Grading & Base I MnDOT Aggregate Production MnDOT Pavement Surface Smoothness ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician Grade I NDDOT Aggregate Field Lab NDDOT Asphalt Mix Tester NDDOT Asphalt Pavement Inspector NDDOT Asphalt Mix Controller NDDOT Soils Field Tester BNSF Railway e-RAILSAFE & Contractor Certification Troxler Nuclear Density Gauge Certification Safeland (PEC) Training – RIGPASS CPR & AED Certification Professional Memberships Name of Organization, Position (if applicable) Additional Credentials Presentations, publications, etc. – list in approved APA format AET Responsibilities • Supporting geotechnical engineering, pavement, and construction materials testing projects • Field and laboratory testing of soils and pavements • Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD), Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), and International Roughness Index (IRI) testing and analysis • Asphalt mix testing • Soil cement stabilization testing • Preparing field and formal reports Project Experience City of Hastings Pavement Investigation Hastings, MN (2019) A geotechnical subsurface exploration, pavement cores, and pavement evaluation program (including roadway GPR) was conducted to determine pavement rehabilitation options. A GPR survey was also conducted throughout Vermillion Falls Park to determine a bedrock profile. Served as lead project manager and coordinated the field and laboratory testing programs and preliminary reports. City of Mounds View Pavement Investigations Mounds View, MN (2018, 2019) Geotechnical subsurface explorations, pavement cores, and pavement evaluation program were conducted on multiple roadway segments and parking lots to determine the current condition of the existing pavement and pavement rehabilitation options. Served as lead project manager and coordinated the field and laboratory testing programs and preliminary reports. CSAH 29 Pavement Improvements St. Louis County, MN (2018) The project consisted of the rehabilitation and pavement improvements on 14 miles of rural roadway. Pavement cores, soil borings were used in conjunction with GPR and FWD testing to develop an economical solution with the county. Coordinated laboratory mix design testing and reporting, as well as GPR analysis. Vancouver International Airport CSB Vancouver, BC, Canada (2018) Served as Lead Project Manager and laboratory testing coordinator for a Cement Stabilized Base (CSB) mix design for this project. Performed laboratory testing, data analysis, and report preparation. Blazing Star Wind Farm Lincoln County, MN (2018) A geotechnical investigation and pavement evaluation program was conducted for the evaluation of preconstruction condition of haul roads. Performed field GPR testing and International Roughness Index (IRI) testing, as well as the IRI data analysis. Michael R. Anderson, PG Geologist II Background Michael is a professional geologist with 9 years of experience, including 3 years of experience in the Pavement Group, assessing existing roadway conditions and subsurface soils for use in roadway design and construction. His expertise includes coordination and oversight of geotechnical subsurface investigations, recommendations for foundation and pavement design, construction material testing and observation, and slope stability analysis. He has also conducted Geohazard Investigations, Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments, and oversaw vertical and horizontal drilling operations for crude oil and natural gas wells. Education BA in Geological Sciences University of Minnesota-Duluth, 2009 Employment American Engineering Testing, Inc. 2019-Present RMG-Engineers, Denver CO Project Geologist/Lab Director, 2016-2019 Columbine Logging Inc., Denver CO Senior Lead, Wellsite Geologist, 2010-2015 Registrations/Certifications Professional Geologist, Wyoming License #4066 CPOW Soils Certified Technician Radiation Safety Certified ACI Grade I Certified Technician Professional Memberships Minnesota Geotechnical Society Rocky Mountain Association of Environmental Professionals (RMAEP) AET Responsibilities • Geotechnical evaluations and investigations • Coordinating and overseeing field work • Permitting, Mapping, and Agency Correspondence • Subsurface exploration, including coordination and program development and review of soil borings and laboratory testing • Data analysis: o Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) o Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) o International Roughness Index (IRI) o Pavement Condition Index (PCI) o Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) Mr. Anderson’s project experience with AET focuses primarily on haul road evaluation for wind farm projects and various roadway projects throughout the US. Below are a few of the most recent projects Mr. Anderson has been involved in. Freeborn Wind Project, Freeborn County, MN and Worth County, IA (2019) Preconstruction geotechnical evaluation and pavement testing services consisting of data collection and analysis of approximately 88 miles of county and local roadways to be used as haul routes. Oakgreen Avenue North Pavement Evaluation, Oak Park Heights, MN (2019) Exploration of existing pavement and subsurface conditions to determine suitability of the roadway for rehabilitation or reconstruction. Geotechnical Engineering /Project Geologist (2016-2019) Experience on projects along Colorado’s Front Range. o Foundation and pavement design recommendations o Coordination and oversight of subsurface investigations o Slope stability analysis o Preparation of Geologic Hazard Reports o Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessments o Inspection of reinforced steel, drains, piers/caissons o Concrete testing (ACI), lab work /testing (ASTM/ASSHTO) o Oversight of lab testing for evaluation of engineering properties of soils Melanie Fiegen, P.E. Senior Engineer Background Melanie Fiegen is a Senior Pavement Engineer at AET with over 9 years of experience performing field investigations and engineering analysis for pavement and roadway infrastructure projects. Education Bachelor of Civil Engineering South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD Registrations/Certifications Professional Engineer (MN#16711)(SD#12875) GSSI RoadScan Processing Cert Certified Special Inspector (1998-2008) Employment American Engineering Testing, Inc. Pavement Engineer (2010 – Present) Twin City Testing (Stork/Element) Senior Engineer, Construction Services (2005 – 2008) STS Consultants, Inc. Senior Engineer, Construction Services (2000 – 2005) GME Consultants, Inc. Senior Engineer, Construction Services (1996 – 2000) Professional Memberships American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) History and Heritage Committee Chair for MN Centennial -2014 South Dakota Engineers Society Minnesota Assoc. of Asphalt Paving Technologists Publications Rettner, D.L., Fiegen, M.S., Snyder, M.B., MacDonald, K.A. Analysis of Bridge Deck Cracking Data: A Review of Mechanisms, Analysis of MnDOT Bridge Construction Data, and Recommendations for Treatment and Prevention. Report No. MN/RC 2014-09, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN. February 2014. AET Responsibilities • Planning and performing field investigations and subsurface explorations for planning pavement rehabilitation projects. • Coordinating Nondestructive Pavement Testing (FWD, GPR, IRI) • Coordinating subsurface explorations and geotechnical testing • Ground Penetrating Radar analyses and reporting • Pavement report preparation including recommendations for subgrade improvement for pavement support and pavement designs Pavement Evaluations Projects include planned subsurface exploration, GPR, FWD and IRI testing and soil classification from soil boring logs on numerous projects, encompassing thousands of roadway pavement miles. Other expertise includes performance of GPR reflection picking and analysis using Radan 7.0 proprietary software, for determination of pavement and base layer thicknesses. Many reports include recommendations for subgrade improvement and pavement design. Select recent projects include: • Washington Co. MN Improvements of 10+ Roadways (2015-18) • Chisago Co. MN Improvements of 10+ Roadways (2015-18) • City of New Hope Street Improvements (2017) • City of Victoria Street Improvements (2017) Soil Cement Stabilization Experience Conducted field observations for soil cement stabilization projects in Iowa, Indiana, Illinois and Kansas; including soil classification, moisture/density determination, test roll observations, nuclear density and dynamic cone penetrometer testing, and consulting. Select recent projects include: • Slate Creek, Gueda Springs, KS (2015) • Fowler Ridge IV, Fowler, IN (2015) • Pilot Hill, Kankankee, IL (2015) • Highland, Primghar, IA (2014) Construction Materials Testing Melanie has managed the construction observations and materials testing for several roadway and trail projects, including performing observation of test rolls, scheduling of technician activities during grading, concrete and bituminous placements, reporting and invoicing. When required, she documents that testing is performed per MnDOT/State Aid Schedule of Materials Control. Select recent projects include: • Minnewashta Park, Chanhassen, MN (2014-15) • H.B. Fuller, Vadnais Heights, MN (2017) • Scott CSAH 21 Concrete Paving, Prior Lake, MN (2013) 550 Cleveland Avenue North | Saint Paul, MN 55114 Phone (651) 659-9001 | (800) 972-6364 | Fax (651) 659-1379 | www.amengtest.com | AA/EEO This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval from American Engineering Testing, Inc. Dear Client, The following paperwork is enclosed: 1. AET's Proposal with Terms and Conditions (Please sign and return to your AET contact) 2. Proof of Insurance (Please give to your accounting department) 3. W9 (Please give to your accounting department) ***If your company is South Dakota or Iowa Sales Tax exempt, please send your tax exempt certificate back with your signed proposal. Please let me know if you have any questions and thank you for choosing AET! Thank you, Robert Krogsgaard CFO, American Engineering Testing, Inc. CONSULTANTS · ENVIRONMENTAL · GEOTECHNICAL · MATERIALS · FORENSICS ENVIRONMENTAL / GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE AGREEMENT - TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 1 of 4 ACS417EG (01/19) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SECTION 1 - RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 - This Service Agreement – Terms and Conditions (“terms and conditions”) is applicable to all Services provided by American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET). As used herein “Services” refers to the scope of services described in the proposal submitted by AET to Client. The proposal, these terms and conditions and any appendices attached hereto shall comprise the Agreement between AET and Client for Services described in the proposal and are binding upon the Client, its successors, assignees, joint ventures and third-party beneficiaries. AET requests written acceptance of the Agreement, but the following actions shall also constitute Client’s acceptance of the Agreement: 1) issuing an authorizing purchase order, task order or service order for any of the Services, 2) authorizing AET’s presence on site, or 3) written or electronic notification for AET to proceed with any of the Services. Issuance of a purchase order, task order or service order by Client which contains separate terms and conditions will not take precedence or modify the terms and conditions contained in this Service Agreement. 1.2 – Prior to AET performing Services, Client will provide AET with all information that may affect the cost, progress, safety and performance of the Services. This includes, but is not limited to, information on proposed and existing construction, all pertinent sections of contracts between Client and property owner, site safety plans or other documents which may control or affect AET's Services. If new information becomes available during AET's Services, Client will provide such information to AET in a timely manner. Failure of Client to timely notify AET of changes to the project including, but not limited to, location, elevation, loading, or configuration of the structure or improvement will constitute a release of any liability or indemnity obligations of AET for loss or damages related to such changes. Client will provide a representative for timely answers to project-related questions by AET. 1.3 - AET is responsible only for performance of the Services. AET will not be held responsible for work or omissions by Client or any other party working on the project. The Services do not include construction management, general contracting or surveying services. AET will not be responsible for directing or supervising the work of other parties, unless specifically authorized and agreed to in writing. 1.4 – Client acknowledges the limitations inherent in sampling to characterize buried subsurface conditions. Variations in soil conditions occur between and beyond sampled/tested locations. The passage of time, natural occurrences and direct or indirect human activities at the site or distant from it may alter the actual conditions. Client assumes all risks associated with such variations in soil and subsurface conditions. 1.5 - AET is not responsible for interpretations or modifications of AET's recommendations by other persons. 1.6 - Should changed conditions be alleged, Client agrees to notify AET before evidence of alleged change is no longer accessible for evaluation. 1.7 – Pricing in the proposal assumes use of these terms and conditions. AET reserves the right to amend pricing if Client requests modifications to the Agreement or use of Client’s alternate contract format. Any contract amendments made after Client has authorized the Services shall be applicable only to Services performed after the effective date of such amendment. The proposal and these terms and conditions, including terms of payment, shall apply to all Services performed prior to the effective date of such amendment. 1.8 - The AET proposal accompanying these terms and conditions is valid for ninety (90) days after the proposal issuance date to the Client. Any attempt to authorize Services after the expiration date is subject to AET’s right to revise the proposal as necessary. SECTION 2 - SITE ACCESS AND RESTORATION 2.1 - Client will furnish AET safe and legal site access. 2.2 Client acknowledges that in the normal course of its Services, AET may unavoidably alter existing site conditions or affect the environment in the area being studied. AET will take reasonable precautions to minimize alterations to the site or existing materials. Restoration of the site is the responsibility of the Client. SECTION 3 - UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES (FACILITIES) 3.1 - AET’s sole responsibility under this section will be to contact the state “call before you dig” notification center (e.g. Gopher State One Call in Minnesota), if such an entity exists, for location information of public utilities only. AET shall have no obligation to proceed with the work until Client has fully complied with all the requirements of this Section 3. 3.2 - Client will mark or cause to be marked the location of all other Facilities that service or are located on the site. AET shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy of all location information supplied by any source. 3.3 - Client acknowledges that location data may be incorrect or that some Facilities may not be capable of location and Client fully accepts this risk and waives any claims against AET for incorrect locations or Facilities incapable of location. 3.4 - Client shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend AET from all claims, damages, losses, fines, penalties and expenses (including attorney’s fees) arising out of or related to the following: a) Facilities that are not shown or vary from the locations shown on any plans or drawings, b) Facilities that are not located by or vary from the locations marked by Client, governmental or quasi-governmental locator programs, or private utility locating services, or c) any other Facilities that are not disclosed or vary from locations provided by the Client. The obligation to defend AET shall be independent of the obligation to indemnify and hold harmless AET and shall be with independent counsel acceptable to AET. SECTION 4 - CONTAMINATION 4.1 - Client acknowledges and accepts all contamination risks which may be associated with the Services. Risks include, but are not limited to, cross contamination created by linking contaminated zones to uncontaminated zones during the drilling process; containment and proper disposal of known or suspected hazardous materials, drill cuttings and drill fluids; and decontamination of equipment and disposal and replacement of contaminated consumables. Discovery of actual or suspected hazardous materials shall entitle AET to take immediate measures it deems necessary in its sole discretion, including regulatory notification, to protect human health and safety, and/or the environment. Further, discovery of such materials constitutes a changed condition for which Client agrees to pay associated additional cost. 4.2 - Client shall indemnify and hold AET harmless from all liability, damages, claims or costs resulting from contaminants on the site. SECTION 5 - SAFETY 5.1 - Client shall inform AET of any known or suspected hazardous materials or unsafe conditions at the site. If, during the course of AET's Services, such materials or conditions are discovered, AET reserves the right to take measures to protect AET personnel and equipment or to immediately terminate Services. Client shall be responsible for payment of such additional protection costs. 5.2 - AET shall only be responsible for safety of AET employees at the site; the safety of all others shall be Client's or other persons' responsibility. ENVIRONMENTAL / GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE AGREEMENT - TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 2 of 4 ACS417EG (01/19) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SECTION 6 – SAMPLES 6.1 - Client shall inform AET of any known or suspected hazardous materials prior to submittal to AET. All samples obtained by or submitted to AET remain the property of the Client during and after the Services. Any known or suspected hazardous material samples will be returned to the Client at AET's discretion. 6.2 - Non-hazardous samples will be held for thirty (30) days and then discarded unless, within thirty (30) days of the report date, the Client requests in writing that AET store or ship the samples. Storage and shipping costs shall be borne solely by Client. SECTION 7 - PROJECT RECORDS The original project records prepared by AET will remain the property of AET. AET shall retain these original records for a minimum of three years following submission of the report, during which period the project records can be made available to Client at AET's office at reasonable times. SECTION 8 - STANDARD OF CARE AET performs its Services consistent with the level of care and skill normally performed by other firms in the profession at the time of this service and in this geographic area, under similar budgetary constraints. SECTION 9 - INSURANCE AET maintains insurance with coverage and limits shown below. AET will furnish certificates of insurance to Client upon request. 9.1 – AET maintains the following insurance coverage and limits of liability: Workers’ Compensation Statutory Limits Employer’s Liability $100,000 each accident $500,000 disease policy limit $100,000 disease each employee Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Automobile Liability $1,000,000 each accident Professional/Pollution Liability Insurance $1,000,000 per claim $1,000,000 aggregate 9.2 - Commercial General Liability insurance will include coverage for Products/Completed Operations extending one (1) year after completion of AET’s services, Property Damage including Completed Operations, Personal Injury, and Contractual Liability insurance applicable to AET's indemnity obligations under this Agreement. 9.3 - Automobile Liability insurance shall include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owned automobiles. 9.4 - Professional Liability Insurance is written on a claims-made basis and coverage will be maintained for one (1) year after completion of AET’s services. Renewal policies during this period shall maintain the same retroactive date. 9.5 - To the extent permitted by applicable state law, and upon Client’s signing of the proposal, which includes these Terms and Conditions, and return of the same to AET, or Client provided forms of acceptance as defined in Section 1.1; Client and Owner shall be named an “additional insured” on AET’s Commercial General Liability Policy (Form CG D4 14 04 08, which includes blanket coverage for Products/Completed Operations and on a Primary and Non-Contributory basis). Client and Owner shall also be named an "additional insured" on a Primary and Non-contributory basis on AET's Automobile Liability Policy (Form CA T4 74 02 12). Any other endorsement, coverage or policy requirement shall result in additional charges. 9.6 - AET will maintain in effect all insurance coverage required by this Agreement at its sole expense, provided such insurance is reasonably available, with insurance carriers licensed to do business in the state in which the project is located and having a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A minus (A-). Such insurance shall provide for thirty (30) days prior written notice to Client for notice of cancellation or material limitations for the policy or ten (10) days' notice for non-payment of premium. 9.7 - AET reserves the right to charge Client for AET’s costs for additional coverage requirements unknown on the date of the proposal, e.g., coverage limits or policy modification including waiver of subrogation, additional insured endorsements and other project specific requirements. SECTION 10 - DELAYS If delays to AET's Services are caused by Client or Owner, work of others, strikes, natural causes, weather, or other items beyond AET's control, a reasonable time extension for performance of work shall be granted, and AET shall receive an equitable fee adjustment. SECTION 11 - PAYMENT, INTEREST, AND BREACH 11.1 - Invoices are due net thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of an undisputed invoice, but not greater than 45 days from the date of the invoice. Client will inform AET of invoice questions or disagreements within fifteen (15) days of invoice date; unless so informed, invoices are deemed correct. 11.2 – Invoices remaining unpaid for sixty (60) days shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement, permitting AET, in its sole discretion and without limiting any other legal or equitable remedies for such breach, to terminate performance of this Agreement and be relieved of any associated duties to the Client or other persons. Further, AET may withhold from Client data and reports in AET’s possession. If Client fails to cure such breach, all reports associated with the unpaid invoices shall immediately upon demand be returned to AET and Client may neither use nor rely upon such reports or the Services. ENVIRONMENTAL / GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE AGREEMENT - TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 3 of 4 ACS417EG (01/19) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. 11.3 – AET reserves the right to secure any unpaid invoice utilizing available remedies at law. AET explicitly reserves its’ Mechanic Lien or Bond Claim rights for nonpayment of an undisputed invoice. Client is responsible for paying AET expenses and attorney fees related to collection of past due invoices. SECTION 12 - CHANGE ORDERS AET's proposal associated with this project provides an estimated cost for the work. If the proposal amount is a time and material estimate, or if changes occur affecting the project scope, estimated quantities, project schedule or other unforeseen conditions, AET will communicate with Client if AET’s fees are approaching the proposal amount and request a change order. However, nothing in this agreement shall be construed in any way as a waiver of payment by Client to AET for services ordered under this agreement. Approval of a change order may be in writing or by electronic communication. SECTION 13 - MEDIATION 13.1 - Except for enforcement of AET’s rights to payment for Services rendered or to assert and/or enforce its lien rights, including without limitation assertion and enforcement of mechanic’s lien rights and foreclosure of the same, Client and AET agree that any claim, dispute or other matter in question arising out of or related to this Agreement shall be subject to mediation as a condition precedent to arbitration or the institution of legal or equitable proceedings by either party; provided however that if either party fails to respond to a request for mediation within sixty (60) days, the party requesting mediation may without further notice, proceed to arbitration or the institution of legal or equitable proceedings. 13.2 - Mediation shall be in accordance with the Construction Industry Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Request for mediation shall be in writing and the parties shall share the mediator’s fee and any filing fees equally. The mediator shall be acceptable to both parties and shall have experience in commercial construction matters. SECTION 14 - LITIGATION REIMBURSEMENT Except for matters relating to non-payment of fees, which is governed by Section 11 hereof, payment of attorney’s fees and costs associated with lawsuits or arbitration of disputes between AET and Client, which are dismissed or are judged substantially in either party's favor, shall be paid by the non-prevailing party. Applicable costs include, but are not limited to, attorney and expert witness fees, court costs, and AET costs. SECTION 15 - MUTUAL INDEMNIFICATION 15.1 - Subject to the limitations contained in Sections 13 and 14, AET agrees to indemnify Client from and against damages and costs to the extent caused by AET's intentional acts or negligent performance of the Services. 15.2 - Client agrees to indemnify AET from and against damages and costs to the extent caused by the intentional acts or negligence of the Client, Owner, Client's contractors and subcontractors or other third parties. 15.3 - If Client has an indemnity agreement with other persons or entities relating to the project for which AET’s Services are performed, the Client shall include AET as a beneficiary. 15.4 - AET's indemnification to the Client, including any indemnity required or implied by law, is limited solely to losses or damages caused by its failure to meet the standard of care and only to the extent of its negligence or intentional acts. SECTION 16 - NON-SOLICITATION Each party to this Agreement (a “Party”) agrees that it will not encourage, induce, or actively solicit any employee of the other party to leave their employment for any reason, provided that neither Party is precluded from (a) hiring any such employee who has been terminated by a Party or its subsidiaries prior to commencement of employment discussions between a Party and such employee, or (b) soliciting any such employee by means of a general advertisement or through an employment agency that does not specifically pursue the employee, or (c) hiring employees or former employees of the other Party who contact the Party on its own accord. This Non-Solicitation provision shall be effective and enforceable for six (6) months following termination of this Agreement. SECTION 17 - MUTUAL WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES Except as specifically set forth herein and to the extent permitted by applicable law, Client and AET waive against each other, and each other’s officers, directors, members, subcontractor, agents, assigns, successors, partners, and employees any and all claims for or entitlement to special, incidental, indirect, punitive, or consequential damages arising out of, resulting from, or in any way related to the services provided by AET under this Service Agreement. This mutual waiver of consequential damages includes, but is not limited to, the following: loss of profits; loss of revenue; rental costs/expenses incurred; loss of income; loss of use of property, equipment, materials or services; loss of opportunity; loss of rent; loss of good will; loss of financing; loss of credit; diminution of value; loss of business and reputation; loss of management or employee productivity or the services of such persons; increased financing costs; cost of substitute facilities; cost of substitute goods/property/equipment; cost of substitute services; and/or cost of capital. This mutual waiver is applicable, without limitation, to all consequential damages due to either party’s termination of this Service Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Service Agreement and related Documents and shall survive any such termination. SECTION 18 - LIMITATION OF LIABILITY To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the total aggregate liability of AET’s officers, directors, partners, employees, subcontractors, agents, and sub-consultants, to Client and/or Client’s employees, officers, directors, members, agents, assigns, successors, or partners, or anyone claiming through Client, for any and all injuries, damages, claims, losses, or expenses (including attorney’s fees and costs) arising out of, resulting from or in any way related to services provided by AET from any cause or causes, including, but not limited to, its negligence, professional errors and omissions, strict liability, breach of contract, or breach of warranty and shall not exceed the total compensation in excess of costs received by AET for services or $50,000, whichever is greater. The limitation of liability set forth herein does not apply to claims arising solely out of or related to the willful or intentional acts of AET. ENVIRONMENTAL / GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE AGREEMENT - TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 4 of 4 ACS417EG (01/19) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. SECTION 19 – UNIONIZATION AET reserves the right to negotiate an appropriate fee increase or to terminate its contract on three (3) days written notice to Client without incurring penalties or costs from Client, Owner and their successors, assignees, joint-venturers, contractors and subcontractors, or any other parties involved with the project for claims, liabilities, damages or consequential damages, directly or indirectly related to AET being required to provide unionized personnel on the project. Reservation of this right on the part of AET represents neither approval nor disapproval of unions in general or the use of collective bargaining agreements. SECTION 20 - POSTING OF NOTICES ON EMPLOYEE RIGHTS Effective June 21, 2010, prime contracts with a value of $100,000 or more and signed by federal contractors on projects with any agency of the United States government must comply with 29 CFR Part 471, which requires physical posting of a notice to employees of their rights under Federal labor laws. The required notice may be found at 29 Code of Federal Regulations Part 471, Appendix A to Subpart A. The regulation also has a "flow-down" requirement for subcontractors under the prime agreement for subcontracts with a value of $10,000 or more. AET requires strict compliance of its subcontractors working on federal contracts subject to this regulation. The regulation has specific requirements for location of posting and language(s) for the poster. SECTION 21 - TERMINATION After 7 days' written notice, either party may elect to terminate this Agreement for justifiable reasons. In this event, the Client shall pay AET for all work performed, including demobilization and reporting costs to complete the file. SECTION 22 - SEVERABILITY Any provisions of this Agreement later held to violate a law or regulation shall be deemed void, and all remaining provisions shall continue in force. However, Client and AET will in good faith attempt to replace an invalid or unenforceable provision with one that is valid and enforceable, and which comes as close as possible to expressing the intent of the original provision. SECTION 23 - GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the Laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to its conflicts of law provisions. SECTION 24 - ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement, including these terms and conditions and attached proposal and appendices, is the entire agreement between AET and Client. Regardless of method of acceptance of this Agreement by the Client, this Agreement supersedes any previous written or oral agreements, including purchase/work orders or other Client agreements submitted to AET after the start of our Services. Any modifications to this Agreement must be mutually acceptable to both parties and accepted in writing. No considerations will be given to revisions to AET's terms and conditions or alternate contract format submitted by the Client as a condition for payment of AET's accrued Services. ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: FAXPHONE (A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext): E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER A : INSURED INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : INSURER E : INSURER F : POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)(MM/DD/YYYY) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person)$ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT OTHER:$ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $(Ea accident) ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person)$ OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident)$AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $ OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ If yes, describe under E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y / N N / A (Mandatory in NH) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER: CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) $ $ $ $ $ The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD AROSS Ann Ross 12/19/2018 AMERCON-12 C CUP3K226009 B 8102L645712 D UB9H915101 A 630539K8896PHX19 E ECH254066939 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 10,000,000 10,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 4,000,000 10,000 500,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 X X X X X X X X E ECH254066939 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 01/01/2019 01/01/2020 RENEWALS: contracts@amengtest.com HUB International Mountain States Limited 245 E. Roselawn Avenue, Suite 31 Saint Paul, MN 55117-1940 (651) 286-0560(651) 288-5137 ILLUSTRATION CERTIFICATE AMERICAN CONSULTING SERVICES INC dba AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC AM PETROGRAPHIC SERVICE 550 CLEVELAND AVE N ST PAUL, MN 55114-1804 The Phoenix Insurance Company The Travelers Indemnity Company of America Travelers Property Casualty Company of America The Travelers Indemnity Company Continental Casualty Company 20443 25623 25666 25658 25674 ann.ross@hubinternational.com N EACH CLAIM AGGREGATE 10,000,000 15,000,000 PROF/POLL LIABILITY RETRO: 070287 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Approve Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria for Minnewashta Parkway Improvement Project Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.6. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­02 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the City of Victoria for the design and construction of Minnewashta Parkway from the city border crossing Minnewashta Parkway to just south of W. 77th Street.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) for consultant services for the project. On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professional services for the Minnewashta Parkway project. On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn and Associates and authorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project. On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study for the project and called a public hearing. On October 28, 2019, the City Council authorized preparation of plans and specifications. DISCUSSION Minnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between TH 5 and TH 7.  The roadway and some of the utilities are in need of rehabilitation.  The city's Capital Improvement Plan includes funding for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020 and 2021.  The limits of the project are from just south of Highway 7 on the north end of the project to just south of W. 77th Street on the south end of the project.   Both Chanhassen and Victoria recognized the benefits of rehabilitating the entire length of the Parkway between TH 7 and TH 5.  The portion of the roadway located in Victoria is from Hawthorn Circle to W. 77th Street and is approximately 840 feet in length while the portion located in Chanhassen is approximately 7,030 feet in length.  Discussions occurred between the two cities to establish a JPA to facilitate this concept.  In performing CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectApprove Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Victoria for Minnewashta ParkwayImprovement ProjectSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.6.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2020­02PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the City of Victoria for the design andconstruction of Minnewashta Parkway from the city border crossing Minnewashta Parkway to just south of W. 77thStreet.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDOn October 26, 2018, the Engineering Department prepared and released a request for proposals (RFP) forconsultant services for the project.On November 8, 2018, the Engineering Department received three proposals from consultants for professionalservices for the Minnewashta Parkway project.On January 14, 2019, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Kimley­Horn and Associates andauthorized preparation of a feasibility study for the project.On October 14, 2019, the City Council accepted the feasibility study for the project and called a public hearing.On October 28, 2019, the City Council authorized preparation of plans and specifications.DISCUSSIONMinnewashta Parkway is a collector street located on the west side of Lake Minnewashta between TH 5 and TH 7. The roadway and some of the utilities are in need of rehabilitation.  The city's Capital Improvement Plan includesfunding for the rehabilitation of Minnewashta Parkway in 2020 and 2021.  The limits of the project are from just southof Highway 7 on the north end of the project to just south of W. 77th Street on the south end of the project.  Both Chanhassen and Victoria recognized the benefits of rehabilitating the entire length of the Parkway between TH 7and TH 5.  The portion of the roadway located in Victoria is from Hawthorn Circle to W. 77th Street and is approximately 840 feet in length while the portion located in Chanhassen is approximately 7,030 feet in length.  Discussions occurred between the two cities to establish a JPA to facilitate this concept.  In performing research relative to the project for the JPA, it was determined that Chanhassen owns the right­of­way associated with Minnewashta Parkway through Victoria between Hawthorne Circle and the northern right­of­way line associated with TH 5.  This right­of­way was ceded to Chanhassen by Victoria in 1992 by a decision of the State of Minnesota's Municipal Board.  Hence, the discussions shifted from a cooperative project with Chanhassen in the lead to a JPA which would allow Chanhassen to access the properties within Victoria the same as the properties within Chanhassen. The current schedule for this project is as follows: Task Date Approve Plans & Specifications; Authorize Ad for Bids  February 10, 2020 Bid Opening March 6, 2020 Neighborhood Meeting March, 2020 Assessment Hearing; Award Contract April 13, 2020 Start Construction May, 2020 Substantial Completion October, 2021 City of Victoria staff will be taking the JPA to their City Council for approval at their regularly scheduled meeting on January 27, 2020. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the JPA with the City of Victoria for the Minnewashta Parkway improvements. ATTACHMENTS: JPA 2020 CIP Sheet 1 202027v6 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY CITIES OF CHANHASSEN AND VICTORIA This Joint Powers Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into this _____ day of ________, 2019 by and between the City of Chanhassen (“Chanhassen”) and the City of Victoria (“Victoria”), both municipal corporations under the laws of Minnesota, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59 (the “Joint Powers Act” or “JPA”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Chanhassen and Victoria wish to provide for the improvement of Minnewashta Parkway, as hereinafter more fully described (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project is wholly located within the City of Chanhassen, but serves and benefits property within the City of Victoria; and WHEREAS, Chanhassen intends to levy special assessments against benefited properties within its jurisdiction for some of its portion of the cost of the Project; and WHEREAS, Victoria desires to levy special assessments against benefited properties within its jurisdiction for some of its portion of the cost of the Project that benefits Victoria residents; and WHEREAS, the JPA authorizes political subdivisions of the state to enter into agreements for the joint exercise of powers common to each; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.221, Subd. 6 authorizes cities to conduct the activities contemplated by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar power; and WHEREAS, Chanhassen and Victoria wish to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of specifying their respective obligations and responsibilities in the construction and financing of the Project in accordance with the JPA. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein expressed, the parties agree as follows: 2 202027v6 1. Purpose. The purpose of this JPA is to specify the duties and responsibilities of the parties regarding construction and financing of the Project. 2. Description of Project. The Project will consist generally of rehabilitating the pavement section of the street and making utility improvements within the right-of-way along Minnewashta Parkway from the south side of TH 7 to just north of TH 5 at 77th St W. The Project will also include repair of curb and gutter as necessary, replacement of the watermain, select sanitary sewer and forcemain repairs, storm sewer upgrades, and surface stormwater improvements. 3. Feasibility Report. Chanhassen has had prepared, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ch. 429 a feasibility report for the Project and plans and specifications for the Project which have been approved by the City of Chanhassen. 4. Design and Construction of the Project. a. Chanhassen shall be responsible for design and construction of the Project, selecting the contractor and awarding the contract pursuant to the requirements of state law, and administering the construction contract for the Project. b. Victoria agrees to cooperate with Chanhassen in the construction and completion of the Project. c. Victoria and Chanhassen agree to notify and coordinate access and other matters with the owners of affected properties regarding the construction schedule of the Project. 5. Cost. Project costs shall be allocated to the City of Victoria based on the assessment amount for the parcels located within Victoria benefitted by the Project as identified in the feasibility report. Project costs include: the cost of preparation of the feasibility report in addition to the plans and specifications, construction observation, engineering and consultant fees, legal fees, contract administration, acquisition of temporary and permanent easements, and construction costs. 6. Payment. The City of Chanhassen shall initially pay all costs associated with the project. All properties along Minnewashta Parkway shall be assessed in a uniform manner as prescribed by Minn. Stat. Chapter 429, including parcels within the City of Victoria. The amount that Victoria is to pay for the Project to the City of Chanhassen, on a yearly basis, shall be equal to the aggregate total of all assessment payments received by Victoria for the Project each year from parcels in Victoria. Payments, commencing in 2021, shall be remitted by Victoria to Chanhassen within twenty (20) days after Victoria receives its real property tax settlement from Carver County. 7. Special Assessments. Each party to this agreement has the authority to specially assess the cost of the Project to the benefitting properties in their own city. Victoria hereby authorizes Chanhassen to hold and conduct, on behalf of the Victoria City Council, all hearings and meetings pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and to determine the assessment amount, equal to or less than the value added by said improvements to the benefitting properties, and to prepare assessment rolls to be certified by the Victoria City 3 202027v6 Council. Chanhassen shall afford to Victoria residents benefitted by the Project the same notices and rights to participate in public hearings as are afforded to Chanhassen residents benefitted by the Project. 8. Rules and Regulations. Chanhassen shall abide by Minnesota Department of Transportation standard specifications, rules and contract administration procedures. 9. Liability and Indemnity. Each party shall be liable for the acts or omissions of its respective officers, agents and employees. Each party agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the other from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages, including reasonable attorney fees, resulting from the acts or omissions of the indemnifying party or its respective officers, agents or employees to the extent such claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages relate to activities conducted by the indemnifying party under this Agreement or in the construction of the Project. Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of any statutory or common law limitations on liability available to either of the parties. For the purposes of determining total liability, the parties shall be considered a single governmental unit as specified in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 471.59, subd. 1a(a), and their total liability shall not exceed the limits for a single governmental unit as specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04. 10. Waiver. Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by Chanhassen shall not be considered employees of Victoria for any purpose, including Worker’s Compensation, and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said Chanhassen employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of Victoria. The opposite situation shall also apply: Chanhassen shall not be responsible under the Worker’s Compensation Act for any employees of Victoria. 11. Notices. For the purpose of delivery of any notice required by this Agreement, notice shall be effective if delivered certified or registered United States mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid or hand delivered to: a. As to Chanhassen: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Attn: City Manager b. As to Victoria: City of Victoria 1670 Stieger Lake Lane Victoria, MN 55386 Attn: City Manager or at such other address as either party may notify the other in accordance with this Section 13. 12. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all oral agreements and representations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof. Any alteration, variation, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid only if in writing and executed by both parties. 4 202027v6 13. Data Practices. All documents regarding the Project shall be handled in accordance with the Minnesota Data Practices Act. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.05, subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the other party and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. 14. Conflict of Interest. Each party, to the best of its respective knowledge, represents and agrees that no member, official or employee shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the Project nor shall any member, official or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement or the Project which affects his or her personal financial interests or the interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he or she is, directly or indirectly, interested. 15. Titles of Sections. The titles of sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in constructing or interpreting any of the provisions hereof. 16. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted under the laws of Minnesota. 17. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each one of which will constitute one and the same instrument. 18. No Waiver. In the event that any provision contained in this Agreement should be breached by either party and thereafter waived by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. 19. Termination. This Agreement shall continue until all warranty periods have expired for the work within the Project and all payments have been made under the terms of this Agreement. Either party may terminate this Agreement prior to award of the Contract for the Project. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chanhassen and Victoria have caused this Agreement to be executed on their behalves on the date first written above. CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Elise Ryan, Mayor And: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager 5 202027v6 CITY OF VICTORIA By: Tom Funk, Mayor And: Dana Hardie, City Manager CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Award of Bid for Building Department Software Purchase Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.7. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  PROPOSED MOTION The city council awards bid for the purchase of BS&A software for the building department. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The current version of Springbrook software used by the building department is at an end of development so no new features are being added. There has been increasing requests for online permitting and Springbrook does not offer this option. A vendor switch is required for mobile applications. This project also includes a Microsoft SQL database license which is a requirement for the BS&A application software.   This item was included in the 2020­2024 CIP as EQ­174 (see attached). RECOMMENDATION The city council awards bid for the purchase of BS&A software for the building department. ATTACHMENTS: Contract EQ­174 BS&A Software 14965 Abbey Lane Bath MI 48808 (855) BSA-SOFT / fax (517) 641-8960 bsasoftware.com Proposal for Software and Services, Presented to... City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County MN December 19, 2019 Quoted by: Dan J. Burns, CPA Thank you for the opportunity to quote our software and services. At BS&A, we are focused on delivering unparalleled service, solutions, support, and customer satisfaction. You’ll see this in our literature, but it’s not just a marketing strategy... it’s a mindset deeply embedded in our DNA. Our goal is to provide such remarkable customer service that our customers feel compelled to remark about it. We are extremely proud of the many long-term customer relationships we have built. Our success is directly correlated with putting the customer first and consistently choosing to listen. Delivering unparalleled customer service is the foundation of our company. City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County MN | December 19, 2019 Dan J. Burns, CPA, Account Executive | (855) 272-7638 | dburns@bsasoftware.com Page 2 of 8 Prices good for a period of 90 days from date on proposal Cost Summary Applications and Annual Service Fee prices based on an approximate population of 25,558. Software is licensed for use only by municipality identified on the cover page. If used for additional entities or agencies, please contact BS&A for appropriate pricing. Prices listed are estimates based on information currently available. Actual pricing can be determined after a further review of the needs of the City of Chanhassen. Applications Community Development $15,620 Building Department .NET Field Inspection .NET $6,560 BS&A Online $9,840 Community Development Subtotal $32,020 Data Conversions/Database Setup Convert existing Springbrook data to BS&A format: Building Department (per database) $13,280 Data Extraction Fee $1,000 Subtotal $14,280 No conversion or database setup to be performed for: Field Inspection Custom Import Custom import from third-party software to populate Building Department database with parcels, properties, and current owners. $1,500 City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County MN | December 19, 2019 Dan J. Burns, CPA, Account Executive | (855) 272-7638 | dburns@bsasoftware.com Page 3 of 8 Prices good for a period of 90 days from date on proposal Project Management and Implementation Planning Services include: - Analyzing customer processes to ensure all critical components are addressed. - Creating and managing the project schedule in accordance with the customer's existing processes and needs. - Planning and scheduling training around any planned process changes included in the project plan. - Modifying the project schedule as needed to accommodate any changes to the scope and requirements of the project that are discovered. - Providing a central contact between the customer’s project leaders, developers, trainers, IT staff, conversion staff, and other resources required throughout the transition period. - Installing the software and providing IT consultation for network, server, and workstation configuration and requirements. - Reviewing and addressing the specifications for needed customizations to meet customer needs (when applicable). $8,800 Implementation and Training - $1,100/day - Days quoted are estimates; you are billed for actual days used Services include: - Setting up users and user security rights for each application - Performing final process and procedure review - Configuring custom settings in each application to fit the needs of the customer - Setting up application integration and workflow methods - Onsite verification of converted data for balancing and auditing purposes - Training and Go-Live Software Setup Days: 1 $1,100 Community Development Applications Days: 15 $16,500 Total: 16 Subtotal $17,600 City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County MN | December 19, 2019 Dan J. Burns, CPA, Account Executive | (855) 272-7638 | dburns@bsasoftware.com Page 4 of 8 Prices good for a period of 90 days from date on proposal Cost Totals Not including Annual Service Fees Applications $32,020 Data Conversions $14,280 Custom Import $1,500 Project Management and Implementation Planning $8,800 Implementation and Training $17,600 Total Proposed $74,200 Travel Expenses $10,545 Payment Schedule 1st Payment: $23,080 to be invoiced upon execution of this agreement. 2nd Payment: $32,020 to be invoiced at start of training. 3rd Payment: $29,645 to be invoiced upon completion of training. City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County MN | December 19, 2019 Dan J. Burns, CPA, Account Executive | (855) 272-7638 | dburns@bsasoftware.com Page 5 of 8 Prices good for a period of 90 days from date on proposal Annual Service Fees Unlimited support during your first year with the program is included in your purchase price. Thereafter, Service Fees are billed annually. After two (2) years, BS&A Software reserves the right to increase the Annual Service Fee by no more than the yearly Consumers Price Index (CPI). Community Development $3,125 Building Department .NET Field Inspection .NET $1,310 BS&A Online $1,970 Community Development Total Annual Service Fees $6,405 City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County MN | December 19, 2019 Dan J. Burns, CPA, Account Executive | (855) 272-7638 | dburns@bsasoftware.com Page 6 of 8 Prices good for a period of 90 days from date on proposal Additional Information Program Customization BS&A strives to provide a flexible solution that can be tailored to each municipality's needs. However, in some cases, custom work may be required. Typical examples include: ` custom payment import/lock box import ` custom OCR scan-line ` custom journal export to an outside accounting system ` custom reports If you require any custom work, please let us know so that we can better understand the scope of your request and include that in a separate proposal. Additional Training - Building Department Report Designer Most of our Building Department customers heavily use our Report Designer, which is included free with the program . Report Designer Training is not included in the training quoted on this proposal and is highly recommended. You may attend a class at our office in Bath Township, or we can train at your location. Report Designer Training is typically completed in one day. Please check the option you are interested in. Report Designer Training will be scheduled after successful implementation and training of your Building Department software. ___ Classroom training, $205/person/day ___ On-site training (unlimited attendees), $1,100/day, travel not included BS&A Online Connection Requirements BS&A Online requires a high-speed internet connection (cable modem or DSL). Payment Processing Requirements Acceptance of online payments requires a contract with one of BS&A’s approved Online Credit Card Processing com panies. Please visit https://www.bsasoftware.com/solutions/bsaonline/public-records-search/ for information. City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County MN | December 19, 2019 Dan J. Burns, CPA, Account Executive | (855) 272-7638 | dburns@bsasoftware.com Page 7 of 8 Prices good for a period of 90 days from date on proposal Acceptance Signature constitutes... 1. An order for products and services as quoted Quoted prices do not include Program Customization, training beyond the estimated number of days, or recommended Bank Reconciliation Consultation 2. Agreement with the proposed Annual Service Fees 3. Acceptance of BS&A's hardware recommendations required to efficiently run the .NET applications Signature Date BS&A PLEDGE. We offer a one-year, risk-reversal pledge on our software. If, up to a year after installation, you are not happy with our software and service, you can return our software for a full refund. Returning Accepted Proposal to BS&A Please return the entire proposal, with signature/date (this page) and contact information (next page) filled out, by any of these methods: Mail: BS&A Software 14965 Abbey Lane Bath, MI 48808 Fax: (517) 641-8960 Email: dburns@bsasoftware.com Once your proposal is received, a BS&A representative will contact you to begin the scheduling process. City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County MN | December 19, 2019 Dan J. Burns, CPA, Account Executive | (855) 272-7638 | dburns@bsasoftware.com Page 8 of 8 Prices good for a period of 90 days from date on proposal Contact Information If any mailing addresses are PO Boxes, please also provide a Street Address for UPS/Overnight mail. If additional contacts need to be submitted, please make a copy of this page. Key Contact for Implementation and Project Management Name______________________________________________________________________________ Title__________________________________________________ Phone/Fax_________________________________________________________________________ Email_________________________________________________ Mailing Address____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City, State, Zip______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IT Contact Name______________________________________________________________________________ Title__________________________________________________ Phone/Fax_________________________________________________________________________ Email_________________________________________________ Mailing Address____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City, State, Zip______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Capital Improvement Program City of Chanhassen, MN Contact Richard Rice 2020 2024 thru Department Major Equipment Description This project funds the implementation of a new software suite which will initially replace the current Springbrook building permit application and adds a land management component for processing all city developments. The requested vendor has additional software modules that can be implemented at a later date. Project #EQ-174 Priority n/a Justification The current version of Springbrook software modules is at an end of development so no new features are being added. There has been increasing requests for online permitting and Springbrook does not offer this option. A vendor switch is required for mobile applications. While Springbrook's parent company Accella does offer an online permit module there are issues integrating it with the Springbrook financial modules. This project also includes a Microsoft SQL database license which is a requirement for the BS&A application software. Budget Impact/Other Annual licensing and support fees to be funded in account 400-4117-4703 after initial one year warranty has expired. Useful LifeProject Name Permiting/Planning Software Upgrade Category Finance Type Equipment Account #2 Account #1 400-0000-4703 Total Project Cost:$94,500 Account #4 Account #3 Total2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Expenditures 94,50094,500Office Equipment 94,500 94,500Total Total2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Funding Sources 94,50094,500Capital Replacement Equipment Fund 94,500 94,500Total CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Award of Bid for LED Lighting Retrofit for City Hall, Library, and Public Works Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.8. Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental Resources Coordinator File No:  PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council awards a lighting retrofit bid for City Hall, the Library and Public Works to Apadana, LLC in the amount of $95,517.13." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Last year, staff presented information to the Council pertaining to a lighting retrofit in public buildings that would reduce annual energy costs for each building.  Staff sought quotes from reputable lighting firms for the installation of LED lighting in three public buildings.  Staff has selected the lowest quote to bring to the Council for approval.  BACKGROUND In June 2019, staff presented information in a work session to the Council pertaining to a lighting retrofit in public buildings that would reduce annual energy costs for each building.  After that discussion, the City Council directed staff to proceed but to have each proposal reviewed in detail by the Center for Environment and Energy.  Staff sought bids from reputable lighting firms for the installation of LED lighting in three public buildings.  The Center for Energy and Environment, in coordination with Xcel Energy, performed detailed reviews on each of the buildings and proposals. The improvements were recommended to be paid for out of the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund as that is the fund that typically pays for significant city building improvements.  In addition, the current reserves in the Capital Equipment Replacement fund are near $1.5M.  After the project is completed and the city audit is complete later this year, the City Council could also consider using a portion of the 2019 General Fund Surplus to repay the Capital Equipment Replacement fund for the improvements. DISCUSSION Staff received two lighting retrofit proposals from respected local companies.  Sylvania and Taylor Electric Company submitted one proposal.  In this proposal, the materials would be supplied by Sylvania through a distributor, J. H. Larson Co., and installation would be completed by Taylor Electric.  City staff would directly supervise the ordering and installation work.  A second proposal was submitted by Apadana, LLC.  An Apadana representative would supervise the project.  Each of the companies that submitted proposals has done significant work for many other Twin Quote 1 ­ Sylvania/Taylor Electric Quote 2 ­ Apadana, LLC Total Project Cost $122,480.05 $128,834.79 Rebate ($25,149.28)($33,317.66) Investment $97,330.77 $95,517.13 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectAward of Bid for LED Lighting Retrofit for City Hall, Library, and Public WorksSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.8.Prepared By Jill Sinclair, Environmental ResourcesCoordinator File No: PROPOSED MOTION"The City Council awards a lighting retrofit bid for City Hall, the Library and Public Works to Apadana, LLC in theamount of $95,517.13."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYLast year, staff presented information to the Council pertaining to a lighting retrofit in public buildings that would reduceannual energy costs for each building.  Staff sought quotes from reputable lighting firms for the installation of LEDlighting in three public buildings.  Staff has selected the lowest quote to bring to the Council for approval. BACKGROUNDIn June 2019, staff presented information in a work session to the Council pertaining to a lighting retrofit in publicbuildings that would reduce annual energy costs for each building.  After that discussion, the City Council directed staffto proceed but to have each proposal reviewed in detail by the Center for Environment and Energy.  Staff sought bidsfrom reputable lighting firms for the installation of LED lighting in three public buildings.  The Center for Energy andEnvironment, in coordination with Xcel Energy, performed detailed reviews on each of the buildings and proposals.The improvements were recommended to be paid for out of the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund as that is thefund that typically pays for significant city building improvements.  In addition, the current reserves in the CapitalEquipment Replacement fund are near $1.5M.  After the project is completed and the city audit is complete later thisyear, the City Council could also consider using a portion of the 2019 General Fund Surplus to repay the CapitalEquipment Replacement fund for the improvements.DISCUSSIONStaff received two lighting retrofit proposals from respected local companies.  Sylvania and Taylor Electric Companysubmitted one proposal.  In this proposal, the materials would be supplied by Sylvania through a distributor, J. H.Larson Co., and installation would be completed by Taylor Electric.  City staff would directly supervise the ordering and installation work.  A second proposal was submitted by Apadana, LLC.  An Apadana representative would supervise the project.  Each of the companies that submitted proposals has done significant work for many other Twin City local governments. The project costs for the two proposals came in very close.  Staff is recommending that the Apadana, LLC bid be selected due to its slightly lower costs after rebates and their ability to oversee the project. Payback on the total cost of investment is anticipated to be three years or less on each building and the energy cost savings to be around $28,000 per year.  Adding in the savings in reduced maintenance and air conditioning expenditures, the annual savings is about $43,000. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the proposal submitted by Apadana, LLC be awarded the bid and be funded by the Capital Equipment Replacement Fund. ATTACHMENTS: Taylor Electric Three­Site Proposal Sylvania LED Lighting Materials Three­Site Proposals Apadana City Hall Proposal Apadana Library Proposal Apadana PW Proposal June 10, 2019 Work Session LED Lighting Discussion Item Quote Date: 11-7-19 Taylor Electric Co. 19717 207"' St. Job Name: LED Retrofit Job Location: City of Chanhassen Big Lake, MN 55309 763-263-5703 763-263-5709 fax To: Jill Sinclair Furnish and install ail labor, misc. electrical parts and equipment to install City supplied LED light fixtures at the City Hail and parking ramp. Library and Public Works buildings: Materials, lift, bucket truck - $5200.00 Total a $68,495.00 NOTES: 1) City to receive, store and supply ail new fixtures 2) City to allow access to all sites as needed 3) Price assumes work being done during normal business hours (no night or weekend work) 4) if the city opts to perform light fixture recycling, $4745.00 may be deducted from quote Call Todd Weidner with any questions 763-244-6986 tweidnei@tayioreiectricco.net We look forward to doing business with you. Labon Public Works Building - Library - City Hail & Parking Ramp - $15,934.00 $23,345.00 $19,271.00 Recycling -$4745.00 Area A- Parking Garage Project #1 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 12 173 MH 150W STD1 1L 12 50 Area B- Exterior LED Retrofit Project #2 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 20 130 MH 100W STD1 1L 34 50 14 93 MH 070W STD1 1L 7 295 HPS 250 STD1 1L 7 110 7 0 Area C - Sheriff Offices Project #3 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 21 85 T8 4' 32 E3-3L-Exist 63 36 Area C - Sheriff Offices Project #4 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 84 51 CFL 26W 2L PL 98 17 14 130 MH 100W STD1 1L Project #5 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 19 73.5 T5 0040W E2 2L 38 34 15 98 T5 0040W E2 3L 45 51 Project #6 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 187 85 T8 4' 32 E3-3L-Exist 561 36 58 58 T8 4' 32 E2-2L-Exist-U lamp 116 30 40 58 T8 4' 32 E2-2L-Exist 116 24 9 110 T8 4' 32 E4-4L-Exist 36 48 SYLVANIA - CITY HALL MATERIAL PRICING New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL GARAG1A/055UNVD740/G5/SV/D 352.94$ 4,235.29$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LEDHIDR5000840CONTRACTOR/74727 35.82$ 1,218.02$ SYL AREAFLD1A/110UNVD840/T3/WH 303.53$ 2,124.70$ SYL AREAFLD1A/POLEMOUNT/BZ/71733 27.11$ 189.74$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LED12T8/L48/FG/841/BF/75007 Type B Lamp 7.06$ 444.72$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LEDRT6R3A1500UD940/60777 45.81$ 4,489.58$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LED17TT5/DL/FG/841/BF/40333 Type B Lamp 10.588 402.34$ SYL LED17TT5/DL/FG/841/BF/40333 Type B Lamp 10.588 476.46$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LED12T8/L48/FG/841/BF/75007 Type B Lamp 7.06$ 3,960.10$ SYL LED15T8/U/FP/841/BF/40614 Type B Lamp 16.47$ 1,910.64$ SYL LED12T8/L48/FG/841/BF/75007 Type B Lamp 7.06$ 818.84$ SYL LED12T8/L48/FG/841/BF/75007 Type B Lamp 7.06$ 254.12$ 20,524.55$ Area A- Exterior Retrofit Project #1 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 10 93 MH 070W STD1 1L 10 17 Area B- Library Retrofit Project #2 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 129 32 CFL-S 032W 1L 129 17 32 14 CFL 13W 1L PL 32 17 13 64 CFL-S 032W 2L 13 17 8 100 INC A 100W 1L 8 14 Project #3 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 60 147 T5 0040W E2 4L 240 68 21 73.5 T5 0040W E2 2L 42 34 Project #4 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 85 T8 4' 32 E3-3L-Exist 255 36 58 T8 4' 32 E2-2L-Exist 116 24 110 T8 4' 32 E4-4L-Exist 440 576 58 T8 4' 32 E2-2L-Exist-U lamp 116 30 Project #5 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 13 73.5 T5 0040W E2 2L 26 24 SYLVANIA - LIBRARY MATERIAL PRICING New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LEDRT6R3A1500UD940/60777 34.12$ 341.18$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LEDRT6R3A1500UD940/60777 34.12$ 4,401.22$ SYL LEDRT6R3A1500UD940/60777 34.12$ 1,091.78$ SYL LEDRT6R3A1500UD940/60777 34.12$ 443.53$ SYL LED14A19/F/830/10YV/RP/74738 4.12$ 32.94$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LED17TT5/DL/FG/841/BF/40333 Type B Lamp 10.59$ 2,541.12$ SYL LED17TT5/DL/FG/841/BF/40333 Type B Lamp 10.59$ 444.70$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LED12T8/L48/FG/841/BF/75007 Type B Lamp 7.06$ 1,800.05$ SYL LED12T8/L48/FG/841/BF/75007 Type B Lamp 7.06$ 818.84$ SYL LED12T8/L48/FG/841/BF/75007 Type B Lamp 7.06$ 3,105.96$ SYL LED15T8/U/FP/841/BF/40614 Type B Lamp 16.47$ 1,910.64$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LED17TT5/DL/FG/841/BF/40333 Type B Lamp 10.59$ 275.29$ 17,207.25$ Area A- Exterior Retrofit Project #1 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 15 295 HPS 250 STD1 1L 15 110 15 0 9 130 MH 100W STD1 1L 9 50 Project #2 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 2 454 MH 400W STD1 1L 2 145 Area B- Offices, Halls Project #3 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 249 64 T5 4' 0028W E2 2L 498 29 Area B- Offices, Halls Project #4 QTY Watts EXISTING Luminaire QTY Watts 123 354 T5 HO 4' 54W E2/4-6L-Exist 492 170 SYLVANIA - PUBLIC WORKS MATERIAL PRICING New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL AREAFLD1A/110UNVD840/T3/WH 303.53$ 4,552.94$ SYL AREAFLD1A/POLEMOUNT/BZ/71733 27.11$ 406.59$ SYL LEDHIDR5000840CONTRACTOR/74727 35.82$ 322.42$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended 60034 AREAFLD1A/145UNVD850/T3/BZ 389.24$ 778.48$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LED13T5HEL48FG841SUB/40109 10.59$ 5,272.82$ New Luminaire Price per Each Extended SYL LED25T5HO/L48/FG/841/SUB/G7/10.00$ 4,920.00$ 16,253.25$ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, June 10, 201 9 Subject Discuss Lighting Systern Efficienry Upgndes for Public Wo*s, Library, and City Hal Section WORK SESSION - After Item No: L.l Prepared By Grcg Sticha Finance Director File No: BACKGROUND In February, ttr city looked ifto the cost benefit of switching 1o LED lighting in thrce public buildings - City HaI, the Library, and Public Wot*s. The cit/s accout r€presentative at Xcel Energy was contacted to disctss errrgr expadiures on lighting for $e buildings. Xcel offered to do a free lighting ardit to see wlrere dre city could save nnney by switding to LED lighting. ln Marcb the Center for Energr and Envimnment sent a repres€ntative to perform audis on each offie buildings. Each fixtue in ev€ry building was invartoried and ary problem areas (lighting loo dirr1 too brighq wmng location, erc) documented. One particular locatiorl the teen r€ading area in tre Library, is panicularly dim ud saffoeressed a need to furyrove the lighting. Overal, the quatiry ard location ofttre lighting fixues in the buildings wae satishctory. The repre*ntative said tlat the quality of lighting would inprove with a switch fiom fluorcscent to LED. The city rcoeived dte res:ults offte audit in April S€parate rcpons were goerated for each building. Infornratiyr found in the analysis includes clEent enersr use, annual utility cost for LED lighs, and the estirnated expense ofthe switch. Based on tlrc three atached lighting systern analysis repors, the recomnrnded initial investrrnt would be $86,845 and offtat arnomt it is estimat€d hat tlle city would receive $27,729 in rebates from Xcel Enerry, bringing the initial totrl inv€stnent lo just over $62,000. During the cplacemart, staffis also estimating some other snall lighting irnpmvemer s ltat may make sense as long as r€placernent LEDS are being imtalled The total investnent aner rebates could be between $70,00G$80,000. The furprovements would rcsult in a total annual esttnated eners/ savings ofaround $23,000 per year, resulting in between a tbree- !o four-year payback. If the City Council wans to proceed with the initia.l invesment of between S70,00GS80,000, sraff would get bids from qualified contractors. Staffwould recommend the improvernens be paid for out of reserves fiom fie Capital Equipmenl Replacement Fund The majority ofthe cost savings would be seen in the city's General Fmd with some small savings also realizcd in the city's Water & Sewer Funds. RECO!I}I E\DATIO\ Staff is tmking for direction on whether o proceed wifi receiving bids from qualified contractors for the rcplacernent of lights to LED lights al tlre Library, City Hall, and Public Wo*s buildings. r l\ + 1l ATTACTL\IE\TS: o City Ha[ Ligltting Sysern Analyss o Ubrry Lighting Sy$em AnaDsis o hblic Work Lighting System tutalfis o XcelEnergy'One-Stop Elliciency Shop@ Bailding Energt Efficiency Programatat0ttrir.a tY tlr0tt. Lighting System Analysis Cost Saving Recommendations Customer Report April 2, 2019 Property Address: City Of Chanhassen-7700 7700 Market BIvd Chanhassen, MN 553 l7-8363 Prepared for: Jill Sinclair City Of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317-8363 Ph:952-227-1133 cee" Prepared by Liglting Specialist: Erik Ennen Center for Energy arld Environment 2 I 2 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 Minncapolis, MN 55401 Mobile: Phone: Fax: E-mail: (6t2)8t9-124s (612) 335-5888 ccnncn@mnccc.org - Audits - Financing - Con rsctors - Rebqtes Program Coordinator: Krlsten Funk Center for Energy and Environment 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 Minneapolis, Minnesota 5540 I 6t2-335-3487 612-335-5888 kfunk@mncee.org Phonc: Fax: E-mail Page I of6 Customer Repon 04/02t2019 05:43 PM n'ogru'nro*l-ooo:I6Jil o Xcel Energy'One-Stop Efficiency ShoP@ Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Lighting Upgrades Estimated Costs Estimated Annual Savings Payback Total Installed Cost Belorc rebate $31,750.00 YOur Final COSt Afret rebate 4 Rebale equals 329/o oJ installed cost. $21,467.ss (I ncluding speciol orderc) $7,3 1 r.04 .Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 davs or by 12/31/2019, whichever comes frsl. One-StoP reserves the right to n ithdiau' this rebate olfer alter expiration. You may requesl an extension, which includes re-verifcation of eligibilin', kWkqh savings, i,tsrqllation costs, estimoted rebate, and program n/les by One-Stop. s10,282.45 CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings S609.25(") Monthly loan payments at 3.9%o for 37 month term 5627 .66tbl (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of$21.682.21, including a $214.68loan processiog fer. Mong.ge, flood and title fees may apply. Thc loan term has a maximum of 5 years, *.ith monthly paymenls not lcss than the estirnated monthly savings. Final rerms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. 3.2 years (lnduding Loa Financing Cha€6) Utility Cost Analysis Demand (KW) Energy (KlYh) Annual Cost CO2 (lbsf Existing Lights New Lights 4r.948 16.168 134.572 50,640 $11,754.06 s4,443.02 228,772 86,089 Estimated Savings 25.780 83,932 $7;1r.04 (a)142,684 ' , How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? ll Rasing concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase in the average surface temperature ofthe Earth overtime. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm geverity, and sea level commonly referred to as "alimate change." i Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups ol fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. ln the LJ.S., GHG emissions come primarilyfrom the combustion ol fossiltuels in en€rgy use- CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent ofthe totalCO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. ! lnstalling energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conseNation measuret that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at ww\^/-eia.doe.gov or www.epa-gov (a) Saviogs cstimates are bascd on standard engineering calculations and arc NOT guaradeed. Your actual savings may be hiShet or lower depcnding on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Lltility Rates = $0.0630/KWh and $7.59/KW, whe.e Demand cosr savings occus primarily during the summer months peak rate hours ofgarn to 9pm. (ll [00.00 ] [0] t0o.00l [00] [rrue] [22.223Kw] ) 7700 Markst Blvd Chanhassen, MN 55317€363 P.ogramlD4 xcel Acct# City Of Ch a 301I l77l l@ it3?0x5tBLE !r lArlllt. (a)2.9 years Utilitv Rebatex Page 2 of6 Customer Repoi (04/02/2019 05:43 PM) o Xcel Energy'One-Stop Elficiency Shop@ Recommended Lighting ProjectsiE!?0i3rttE tr raTIlt. Recommended Lighting System Upgrades Schedule Nrme & Hours/year ofOperrtion lnstalled Cost Estimatcd Annual Srvings Select Prcject *l 7x24 8,7@ h.s/yt t1,861.09 Incl Speci.l Ord€' t948.96 g otv 12 Watb EXSnNG Luminalr. 173 MH 1sOW STD1 1L Prcject 12 Exterior 4,380 h6/yr (Night'Onty) 16,2A9.25 Ircl Spocial frcr 1981.s1 otv ?4 7 W.tlt t{EW Lumin.iro 40 LED 040W lL COB 150 LED Ar€a Light 150W otv m 14 7 Wrttr EXISTING Luminair. 130 MH lMW STD1 lL 93 MH OTOW STD1 1L 295 HPS 250W STD'| 'L Pmjcct: l,7x10 3,650 h6/yr t723.92 lncl Special der 7411 21 s otv 21 watt EXlSTlt{G Lumln lr. 85 T8 4' 32 E3-31-Exist otv 21 W.tt NEW Lumin.iro 24 LEO 012W Lin€ar-T8-Bypass-4' 2L 5r10 Z@1 htslyr t4,472.22 locl special frcrPrcje* U $.r83.02 s olv 98 W.tt! tlEW Lumln.lr. 15 LED 0l5W Can lL oty u 14 trydb EXISI G Lumln8lrr 51 CFL 26W 2L PL 130 MH 1mW Sm1 lL 5x10 Z607 htsl,!( tz3s333 Incl Special frcr t471.39Projecc: *S otv 34 l{.lt! llEW Lumin.l.. 30 LED 030W 1L-N6wFir ov 19 15 Wlttr EX|STING Lumln lr. 73.50 T5 0040W E2 2L 98 T5 0040W E3 3L 5r10 z@7hw t15,050.09 Ilcl SFi.l (H.r s3,3r4.95Prcject: *6 oty 187 68 40 W.ttr 30 24 ,IE l{El{ Lumln lri LED 012W Linear-T&Bypass-( 3L LED 030W 1L-NewFix LED 0 l 2W Linearl&Bypass-a' 2L LED 0'!2W Un6arT&Bypass{' 4L otv 187 68 40 I Wlr. 85 58 58 110 EXlSTll{G Lumlnllrt T8 4' 32 E$31-Erbt T8 4' 32 E2-21-Exist-Utubo T8 4' 32 E2-21-Eist T8 4' 32 EgL-Exist TOt1lS \ncludine special orders)$31,750.00 s7.311.04 3031 l77l I City Of Chanhassen-zoo 7700 Markot Elvd Chanhass€n, MN 5531 7-E363 Program II)4 Xccl Acct# @Page 3 of6 Customer Rcport (04/0?2019 05:43 PM) Area A: Garage Area B: Exterior LED Retrofit Area C: Sheriff Offices Area D: Offces. Halls, Misc Oty lry{b tlElry Lunln l]! 't2 fi LED 050W 1L-NewFix s g g @ Xcel Energy'One-Stop Elficiency Shop@ Customer Participation Agreementittt0ttt!tt tt i^TUtt. I, rhe undcnigncd, agrce that ro the best ofmy knowledge the lighting schedule below accurstely describes how the lights are oPeratcd at the facility lisred in this document. I understand that the energy or cost savings reflected in this analysis are estimates, and that Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) and Xcel Energy do not guaraltee that a specific levcl ofcnergy or cost savings will result from the implementation ofenergy consewation measures or the use ofproducs funded uoder this program. I also give CEE permission to submit, on my behalfl all Xcel Energy rebate and hnancing forms required for the One-Stop Efficiency ShoptD program. I undeEtand that CEE and its staffdo not perform lighting installation services. I agree to have CEE contact a participating conE-actor who will contact me to sch€dule a time to perform a walk-through inspection, an4 ifl agree to hire the contractor, to schedule a time to complete the lighting installations that are checked under the "Selected" column ofthis document. I understand that I must enter into a separate agreement with the conracror to rcceive lighting installation services. I understand that contactors generally perform installation during weekdays and labor will be charged accordingly. I understand that the contractor will provide a one-year warranty on all labor and equipment that will be inshlled as pan ofthis program and that the terms of lhe warranty will be pan ofmy agrccmcnt with thc conkactor. I undcrstand lhat thc contractor alonc, and not CEE, provides a warrsnty on thc insallation services. I frrnher understand that all electrical code violations that are found during a contracto/s inspection or during inshllation must be brought up to code at my expensc. Costs for corrccting code violations are NOT included in thc installation costs quoted in this document. By signing below I certiry that I have read, understand and will comply with the attached One-Slop Efficiency ShoptD RULES and REQUIREMENTS, and that I can not apply for other rebates offercd by Xcel Energy or any other energy-cfficiency program towards lamps or lighting work covered by this agreement. Select One I Financed I Cash Signaturc Dale Customer Cost: 32l,467 .55 (Including special orders) Lighting Schedules Your lighting savings are based on the following average hours of operation Lighring Schedule Name Mon Tucs Wcd Thur Fri Sat Sun 5xl0 2.607 hEirr 10.0 hn 10.0 hrs l0 0 hrs 10.0 hls 10.0 hrs 7rl0 3.650 hrYyr 10.0 h6 10.0 hr}10.0 hrs 10.0 hrs 10.0 hrs 10.0 hrs 7x21 t.?60 hrvyr l2:00 AM lo l2:00 AM l2:00 AM to l2:00 AM t2$0 AM | 2:lD AM l2:m AM lo l2:m AM 12:00 AM l2:00 AM l2:00 AM to l2:00 AM l2:00 AM to l2:00 AM Extcrior 4,180 hdyr 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs l:0 hrs 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs 303 t l7?l I 7700 Market Blvd chanhasson, MN 5531 7{363 Program ID4 Xccl Acctf 7700 @Page 4 of6 Customer Report (04/02/2019 05:43 PM) 10.0 hrs O\E-STOP EFFICIE\-CY SHOP@ PROGRANI RULES and REQUIREI\IENTS The Ooe-Stop Efficiency ShopOO lighting elliciency program (Onc-Stop Efliciency shop@), adhinistered by Center for EDcrgy and Environment ('tEE ') and funded through Xcel Energy. offers cash rebates to eligible small business customers ("Panicipant") who purchase and install qualirying cncrgy-cfficicnt lighting producs in existing buildiogs. The intent ofthe One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ operating as a Minnesota Conservation Improvemenr Program (CIP), is ro incentivize Xcel Eaerg/'s customers to ilstsll eoergy ellicieot equipmeot earlier than they would have otherwise by defi'aying a ponioo ofthe cost ofthe renofit. To ensue that th€ program op€rates as inteflded, thc Participaot must havc a financial strke in the mnsaction and lhc Panicipsnt's Pmject Cost must be greater than zero to raccivc a Onc-Slop Efficiency Shopo rebate. Prrticiprtrt Qurlifi crtioDs Oae-Stop Elfrciency ShopO rebates apply only to qualified Xctl Energy customers with a valid commercial electric account in Xcel Ercrgy's Minnesota service territory that meet One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ eligibility requirements. The Vendor or Panicipant musr v€riry wift a CEE consultant that an Xcel Energy account is eligible for Orc-Stop Ellici€rcy Shopo Ebates before committiog to, purchasing equipment for or implementing a project. To dctcrmine if a business qualifies for the One"Stop Efficiency Shop@ please co.tact CEF. ar (612'12M-242'1. Eligibility Requirements l. Rebate irems must be installcd at thc Xcel Energy electric account listed on the application. 2. Alt equipment must be new. Us€d or rebuill e{uipment is noi eliSible for e rebate- 3. All removed lighting cquipmcnt (lamps. ballasts a.d fixturcs) must bc properly recycled, and cannot bc sold or reused at another location. Documentarion may be rcquired to ensue compliance with proper disposal of equipmeot. 4. Energy-efficient equipment must result in an electric load reduction. 5. Xcel Energy and CEE recommend Illuminatiog Engineering Soci€ty (lES) light levels. Participant is rcsponsible for approval offinal light levels. 6. Rebates are offered for interior lighting, exterior cauopy lighting. soffir fixtures, wall pack fixtures. parking g.rage and parking lot lighting. Rebates \{ill not be issued for smet lighting. Most screw-in compact fluorescent lamps (CFLS) arc not eligible for rebates. 7. lamps or other equipmenl that havc alrcady b€en rebated rhrough any other Xcel Energy rebatc programs ar€ ineligiblc for a rebate under the One-Stop Efficiency Shop@- This includes upstream programs rhat paovide incentives to manufactureni, distributors and retailers ro sell p.oducts at a discoufied price. 8. CEE resen'es the right to disallow a rebate ifit determines. in its sole judgmen! that the lighting technology is inappropriatcly applied or light levels are inadequate. Contact your CEE consultant to determine qualificalion ofcustom or specialry lighting projects. 9. Equipment must be puchased, properly installed and fully operating prior to submitting an application for a rebatc. Vetrdor Responsibilities l0- The "Vendor" is any person or compatry that is consulting ou the projeo, selling the project to rhe panicipan! completing the work and/or suppllng the materials. Vetldor is alt independetrt coDfactor aod not alr age[l or rcpres€rllative of Xcel Energy or CEE, has no aulhority to bind Xcel Energy or CEE, and is solely rcsponsible for sub-conr-acto.s the Vendor hires to do some or all of the work aad./or supply materials. I l. The vendor mu$ clea y communicate to the Panicipant the puryose and requirements ofthe One-Stop Elficiency Shopo, including cligibility requirements for lighting rcbates. The VeDdor must i[volve the CEE consultant in commuDic.tions with the Participant, and must keep the CEE consultant fully informed regarding alldetails ofthe transaction. I 2. Vendors are responsible for rcvicwing, signing and rctuming the Cont'acro. Report to CEE beforc matcrials arc ordered. By signing rhe Contraclor Report, lhe Vendor represens and warrants that the tr.nsaction complies *ilh these Rulcs and Requirements and that the project specifications in tho Conttactor Repon are accuBte. acceptable and will be installed as specified. 13. Any inaccuracies conceming project specifications must b€ reponed immediately ro a CEE consultanl so they can be addressed, the rebate recalculated if necessary and a revised repon issued to the Vetrdor and the Panicipant. 14. VeDdor must contact a CEE consultant whenever there are changes to the project so thal equipment eligibility can be confirmed and rhe rebate valuc can be re-calculated ifnacessary. 15. CEE will not be responsible for changes in the rebate value if the Vendor does not sign and retum the Contractor Report. and repon: inaccuracies in the ConFactor Reporti changes in the equipment m be installed; or changes rn the project dunng consrucrion. Rcbrt€ Crlculrtiotrs 16. Rebate values are bas€d on CEE's calculation ofelecrric dernand ( KW) and en€rgy (klvh) savings. Hours used for calculation of tie kWh saviags must be ar accuate rcpaesentation of the Participaft's operating schedule. 17. Electric demand add energy savings arc calculated usiog lighriog efficiency baselines established by the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA). EISA sandards apply to most Tl2 and incandcscent lighting techDologics todsy, and will apply to othcr technologies as elficiency requirements continue to be phased in. 18. Ifan Xcel Energy lighting rebate was previously assigned to this account and the rebated lighting was subsequently convened ro a less efficient lighting system. a One-Stop corsultant must review the situation to determine the correct baseline energy use for calculating the rebate. 19. Rebates are based on the eoergy use ofthe equipmetrr actually installed at the site and the Participant's Project Cost. Rebates will be recalculated ifthe final equipment and Panicipant's Project Cost is different than originally approved by CEE. 20. Rebates cannot exceed 50 percent of the Panicipanas Project Cost, unless otherwise specified by lhe One-Stop Elliciency Shope. The minimum rebate paid is $5.00. 21. "Participanfs Project Cost" means the Panicipant's financial obligation for the lighting rctrofit bascd o'l the totill ptoject cosi less any and all Deductions, regandless ofwhen these Deductions are received. 00038685Page 5 of6 Customer Report 04i02/2019 05:43 PM Proemm IDd -\ Ilinnesot! ( on5crrrtion Impro\emcnt Progrtn (( ll') Offcrcd b\ Centcr for Etrergr and En\'ironmcnt Pagc I of: 22. "Deductions" means anything ofvalue received by the Panicipant thal reduces the Panicipalt's actual out-of-pocker cost for tbe ligrrting retrofit including, but nol limited to: labor or material donations: monetary donations: labor or matenal cost deductioDs; graDts; awards. rebates; or any other assistance of monetary value provided, directly or indirectly. by the vendor, its aBents or .epresentatives to reduce the Participant's actual financial obligatioD for thc lighting project. 23. The following typ€s offinancial transactions are not allowed as methods ofpaymeot by the Panicipant for the lighting project: barter. rn-kind donations and performance contlacting. 24. All Deductions must be scparatcly itemizod on the final invoicc submiftcd to CEE- Thc Participant's Project Cost must be greater than zero to receive a one-Stop Efliciency Shop@ rebate. Invoice 25. The Vendor must submit an accurate. complete and transparcnt final invoice for the compleled lighting retrofit. All parties involved in lhe project, including the Panicipant and CEE. must have a cle.r understandiog ofthe scope ofwork and associated projecl costs, including any Dcductiom that havc bc{n applicd. 26- tnvoice(s) submined must include: ( I) iremized quanlity, manufacturer's make and model numbers for each rnaterial item, (2) a lump sum amount for both material and labor, and (3) grand total project cost. In some cases, original equipment manufacturet (OEM) specificatioo sheets may bc requested for verification or clarification. 27. The Vendor must provide the Panicipanr an invoice that reflects the same financial information lhar is submitted to CEE. including any Deductions that have been applied. Verificrtiotr 28. CEE reserves the right to iospect Paflicipanfs facitity(ies) for installarion of malerials listed on this rebate applicarion and will need access ro survey the inslalled project. Participanr must keep a sample of any and all t-vpes of equipment ronoved for a period ofrbtee (3) months after receiving a rebate from Xccl Energy. Iftfie inspection determincs that Participant did not comply lvith these Rules and Rcquircmenls. any rebate received by Participant must be promptly retumed to Xcel Energlr 29. vendor agecs to promplly providc CEE with sucb additional documentation and information as may be necessary to veriry compliance rvith these Rules and Requiremenrs. such as copies of cancelled checks or other relevant receipts/records as prooflhat lhe Participant paid thc amount rcflcctcd on thc invoice. Rebates for that project will not be paid until all rcqucsted docurnentation and info.marion is prolided and verified. Reblte Application rnd Pryment 10. One-Stop EIficiency Shop8 rulcs and rebate eligibility requirements arc subjecl to change. It is thc Panicipant's and Vendofs rcsponsibility to veriry with CEE that estimated reb.tes are srill valid before committitrg to. purchasilg equipment for or impleme itrg a project. CEE will not pay a rebate for projects where the invoice is submined morc lhan l2 months aflcr thc stan ofthc projc{|. 3l . Xccl Energy and CEE are not rcsponsible for any lost. lale, stolen, ineligible, illegible, misdirected or postage-due mail. All cornpleted rebate applications and other submissions in connection with the One- Stop Efficiency Shopo b€come the property ofXcel Energy and CEE and will not be returned. 32. ln cases ofdeferred paymenl CEE reseaves the right to process the rebate only whetr full paymenl is received by the Vendor ftom the Participant- All fi.anc€d and alt.mate paymcnt plans must be documented with detailed. legally obligating and signed conkacts. CEE reserves rhe right to disallow any payment plal tbat ils sraffdetermhes is not in compliance with the progtam design inlent and rules. 33. Rebates will not be disbursed until thc pmjcct is fully installed and verified. 34. The rebate check will be sent to the Participant (i.e., Xcal Energy Bccount holder) listed on the rebate application, unless otherwise authorized by CEE. Xcel Encr8y will issue rebates in the form ofchecks, Dot utility bitl credis. J5. Once completed paperwork is submitrcd and approved, rebate paymcnts are usually made in 6 to 8 weeks. Special !{otices 36. Xccl Energy and CEE reservc thc right to rcfilsc payment or participation in the Ooe-Stop Efficiency Shopo ifthc Participant or Vendor violates program design inteot. rules and procedures. Xcel Energy and CEE arc nol liable for rebales promised to Participants as a rcsult of a Vendor misreprcsenting the program. 37. The One-Stop Efficiercy Shop@ is subject to 60 days notice of callcellation. The Participant and Vendor are rcsponsible for checking with a CEE consultant to determine whether the program is still in effect and to veriry progmm requirements. 38. CEE RESERVES TIIE RIGHT TO DISQUALIFY NON- COMPLIANT VENDORS FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE ONE-STOP EFFICIENCY SEOPTD. Dischimers Xcel Energy and CEE: 39. Do not endoBe any particular vendor, ma[ufacturer, product or sysrem design by offering these rcbates; 40. Will not be rcsponsible for any tax liability imposcd oo the Participant as a result oflhe payment of rebates; 4I. EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES. EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO ANY PRODUCTS, EQUIPMENT, MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP PROVIDED, SUPPLIED OR INSTALLED IN CONNECTION WTIH THE ONE.STOP EFFICIENCY SHOP6). Warranties. ifany, are between Panicipant and equipment manufacturer (s) and/or Vendors. 42. Are Dor resporsible for the disposal of removed lightiag equipment (lamps, ballasls and/or fixtu.es) replaced as t resuh ofthis progarn, whctl lcquircd for optimuu lightitrg perfonMncc; 43. In no everrt shall be liable for aay indircc,r, special, incidental, consequential or punitive damages arising out of or relating to admi stering the Orc-Stop Efficiemy Shopo: ,14. Do oot guarantee thal a specific level ofenergy or cost savings will result ftom the iEplementation of energy conservation measues oi the use of producrs funded utrder this program. Fd hm '.fmate. onracl cEE Er Pl{e: 1612) 2112!27 F*: (512) 3315888. i/t l To: C€nl€r lo. EmBry and EfriMnr6nl 212 3d av.M l,L.th, sdb 55o M'n..€pdn, irN 56401 ONE-STOP EFFICIENCY SHOP@ PROGRAN{ RULES ANd REQUIRENIENTS 00018685Page 6 of6 Customer Report 04i02/2019 05:43 PM Proeram ID* cee" cEE FACEI, PrDlr.m Rd6, 130326 Pag{ 2 of2A llinnesota ( onscrtation lmprovement Program (ClP) Oafercd hr Center for Energr and fnlironmenl o Xcel Energy' taaaottrrLa tt tlTtat. Cost Saving Recommendations Customer Report April 7,2019 Property Address: City Of Chanhassen/Library 771 I Kerber St Chanhassen, MN 553 l7 Prepared for: Jill Sinclair City Of Chanhassen 771 I Kerber St Chanhassen, MN 5531 7 Ph:952-227-1133 cee:' Prepared by Lighting Specialis: Erik Ennen Certer for Energy and Environment 212 3rd Avenue North, Suite 560 Minncapolis, MN 55401 Mobile: Phone: Fal(: E-mail: (612) 819-7245 (6r2) 335-5888 eennen@mncee.org - Audits - Financing - Contaclors - Rebates Program Coordinaor: Kristen Funk Center for Energy and Environment 212 3rd Avcnue North, Suitc 560 Minneapolis, Minaesota 55401 612-335-3487 612-335-5888 kfunk@mncee.org Phone: Fax: E-mail: Page I of6 Customer Report 04/071201908:16 PM One-Stop Elliciency Shop@ Building Energt Elftciency Program Lighting System Analysis r.og--ro,+lG'jEl @ xcetEnergy'One-Stop Elficiency Shop@ Summary of Recommended Lighting UpgradesntSt0iirStt tI ilTUtt. Lighting Upgrades Estimated Costs Estimated Annuel Sevings Total Installed Cost Before rebate $ 18,350.00 YOur Final CoSt Afret rcbate 4 Rebate equals 250% of installed cost. $ r3,677.84 ( I ncl udi ng special orders) $6,408.49 (a) 2. 1 years tJob mrst be completed dnd invoices submilted within 90 days or bv 12/31/2019, whichever comes frst. One-Slop reserves the right to h'ithdraw this rebate oller after expirqlion. You may requesl an extension, which includes re-veriJication of eligihilin', kll/kW savings, insldllation costs, estimated rebate, and progrom rules by One-Stop. $4,672.16Utilitv Rebate* 2.3 years (lnduding Loan Financing Charge5) Utitity Cost Analysis Demand (KW) Energy (KWh) Annual Cost CO2 (lbs)- Existing Lights New Lights 3l .157 14.742 I l7,546 55,43s $12,229.99 s5,821.50 199,828 94,240 Estimated Savings t6.415 62,1l0 $6,40E.49 (a)105,587' ' How do CO2 emassions affect me and my busine5s? 1l Rising concentrations ol greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase in the average surface temperature ofthe Earth over time. Rising temperatures produ(e changes in pre(ipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly rclerred to as "climate change." ! Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups oI fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCS and CFCS) are the major GH6. ln the u.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion ot fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. ! lnstalling energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conseryation mea5ures that reduce electric energy us€ significantly r€duces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at www.eia.doe.gov or wwwepa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT glarantced. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and olher electric equipmcnt in your building. Elect c Utility Rates : $0.0630/Km and $11.30/KW. where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the surhmer months peak rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (13 [00.00 ][0] [00.00] [00] [True] 05,635Kw1 ) 302595302 r,11 Kertar St Chanhassen, MN 55317 Program lD{ Xcel Acct*@rPage 2 of6 Customer Repon (04/07/2019 08:16 PM) Payback CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $534.04(") Monthly loan payments at3.gYofor 27 month term $541.89G) (b) E$ihate based ona loan amount of S 13.877,84, including a $200.00loan processing fee. Mongage, flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with moothly paymenls not less than the estimated monthl) savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. o One-Stop Efliciency Shop@ Recommended Lighting Projectsittt0tltttt tY xaTUtt. Recommended Lighting System Upgrades Schedule Name & Hours/year of Operation Installed Cost Estimrted Annual Savings Select Projecc *1 Erterior 4,380 h6rr (Niqht-Only) 1683.17 Incl Spe.id Ordct 1215.23 otv 10 WatL EXST|I{G Lumlnair. 93 MH 070W STDI 1L atv 10 w'tts HEW Luminai.r 15 LED 015WCan'lL Prcie* {2 72 Hou6/We€k 3,7yh6/yl t266.64 Incl Spccial Ordcr t2,411.55 g Watts NEW Luminair. 15 LED 015W A-Lamp 1L Qtv 8 otv 129 32 13 8 W.ttr EIISTIIG Llmin ir. 32 CFL-S 032W 1L 14 CFL 13W 1L PL 6il CFL"S 032w 2L 100 INC A 100W 1L (EISA= INC A 072W 1L) Prcject: *i 72 Hours/We€k 3,794 h6/yt 16,097.22 lncl Special Order $1.312.53 g ary 60 21 Wattr EXSTING Lumlaair. 147 T5 0040W E2 4L 73.50 T5 0(x0W E2 2L atv 60 21 W.tb t{EW Lumin.iro 100 LED 025W LinBr-T8-dElallast4'4L 50 LED 025w LineaFT&dBallast.4' 2L tuojecc U 72 Hours/Week 3,7Y hEl,!( 17.703a5 Incl Spccial Ordcr s2.296.67 g atv 7a 67 13 Watt! 85 58 1't0 58 EXISTING Luminsirr T8 4' 32 E$31-Aisl T8 4' 32 E2-2L-Exist T8 4' 32 E4-4L-E{isr Tg 4' 32 E2-21-Eist-Utube atv 7a 67 13 't3 watt3 45 32 60 36 ,{EW Lumin.ir. LEO 015W Lin€ar-T&w/Ballast-4' 3L LED 016W Linoar-T8-w/Ballast4 2L LEO 015W Linear-T8-w/Ballast-4' 4L LEO 018W Linear-T8-dBallast-4' 2L U-Shape tuoJect: *5 72 Hours/week 3,754 h6/yr $3,s99.s2 $72.5r llal ary '13 W.ttr EXISTING Lumimir. 73.50 T5 0040W E2 2L otv 13 W.lt NEW Lumin.ire 40 LED 40W New Flood Fixlure l3;falg (lncluding special orders)$18,3s0.00 $6.408.49 102595302 City Of Chanhassen/Library 77'l'1 Kerbsr St Chanhassen, MN 55317 Program ID{ Xcel Acctf E@TEilPage 3 of6 Customer Report (04/0712019 08:16 PM) Xcel Energy" Area A: Exterior LED Retrofit Arca B: Library LED Retrofit @ xcetEnergy" iEat0tlt!tE tt rATUiE. One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ Customer Participation Agreement I, the undersigncd, agrce that to the best ofmy knowledgc thc lighting schcdule below accurately desmibes how the lights are opcmted at the facility listed in this documeot. I undeGtand that the energy or cost savings reflected in this analysis are estimates, and that Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) and Xcel Energy do not guarantee that a specific level ofenergy or cost savings will result from the implementation of energy conservation measures or the use of products funded under this program. I also give CEE permission ro submit, on my behatf, all Xcel Energy rebate and hnancing forms required for the One-Stop Elficiency Shop@ program. I undentand that CEE and irs shffdo not perform lighting installation services- I agree to have CEE contact a panicipating contractor who will contact me to schedule a time to perform a walk-through inspection, and, ifl agree to hte the contractol to schedule a time to complete the lighring installarions rhar are checked under the "Selectcd" column ofthis document. I understand that I must enter into a separate agreement with the contractor to receive lighting installation services. I understand that conmdors generally perform installation during weekdays and labor will b€ charged accordingly. I understand rhat the contractor will provide a one-year warranty on all labor and equipment that will be insralled as part ofthis progam and that the terms ofthe warranty will be pan ofmy agrccmcnt with thc contractor. I understand that the contractor alonc, and not CEE, provides a waranty on the installation services. I firrther understand that all electrical code violations lhat are found during a conractols inspection or during inslallation must be brought up to code at my cxpcnse. Costs for correcling code violations are NOT included in lhe installalion costs quotcd in this document. By signing below I ceni| that I have read understand and will comply with the attached one-Stop Efliciency Shop@ RULES and REQUIREMENTS, and that I can not apply for other rebates offered by Xcel Energy or any other etrergy-efficiency program towards lamps or lighting work covered by this agreement. Select One ! Financed ! Cash Lighting Schedules Your lighting savings are based on the following average hours of operation Lighting Schedule Name Mon Tucs Wcd Thur Fri Sat Sun 72 Hourr/r eck 3,754 hrryr 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM 8:00 AM lo 8:00 PM 8;00 A,M to 8:00 PM 8:00 AM 8:00 PM 8r00 AM 5100 PM E:00 AM lo 5:00 PM I I:00 AM to 5:00 PM Extcrior 4.380 hrJyr 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs 12.0 hls 12.0 hrs l:.0 hrs City of Chanhassen/Library 7711 Kerb€r St Chanhassen. MN 55317 Program ID, xcel Acct4 @Page 4 of6 Customer Report (04/0712019 08:16 PM) Signahtre Jillsinclair Date Customer Cost: $13,677 .84 (Including special orders) 12.0 hrs 302595302 \ !linlrrsotn ('on!(rration lmpro\emcnt l'rogranr (( llt) Offercd b] ('cnlcr for Energr and Enrironmerl The Orc-Stop EllicieDcy ShopOO tighting efficietrcy program (Otre-Stop Efficiency Shop@), administered by Center for Energy and Environment ('.cEE ') and funded through Xcel Energy, oIIe$ cash rebates to eligible small business customers ("Participant") who purchase and instau qualirying encrgy-ellicient lighting products in existing buildiogs. The intent ofthe One-Stop Efficiency Shopo operating as a Minnesota Conservation Improverhent Program (CIP), is to incentivize Xcel Enelgy's customers to install energy elficient equipmeat earlier thaa they would have otherwisc by defiaying a ponion ofthc cosl ofthe rcrrofit. To cnsue that the progam opcratcs as intendcd, the Participant must havc a financial stake in the transaction and ihe Panicipant's Projcct Cost must be greatcr thatt zero to receive a Onc-Slop Elficiency Shopo rcbate. Prrticiprnt Quelifi cetions One-Stop Etficiency Shop@ rebates apply only to qualified Xcel Energy cuslomers with a valid commercial electric account in Xccl Energy's Minnesota service lerritory that meet One-Stop Efficiency Shopo eligibility requirements. The vendor or Panicipant musr veri& with a CEE consullant that an Xcel Ercrgy accoult is eligible for One-Stop Elliciency Shopo rebates before coEmitting to, purchasiog equipment for or impfementing a project. To determine ifatusines.s qualifies for the One-Stop Efliciency Shopo please contact CEE at (6121244-2427. Eligibillty Requirements l. Rebate items must be installed at the Xcel Etrergy electric account listed on the application. 2. All equipment must be new. Used or rebuilr equipment is not eligible for a rebate. 3. All removcd lighting equipment (lamps, ballasts aod fixtures) must bc properly recycled, and cannol bc sold or re8sed at anothcr location. Documentation may be required to ensure compliance with proper disposal ofequipment. 4. Energy-emcient equipment must result in an electric load reduction. 5. Xcel Energy and CEE recommend Illuminating Engineering Society (lES) lighr levcls. Participant is responsible for approval of final light levels. 6. Rebates are offered for interior lighting, exterior canopy lighting. solTit fixtures, wall p.ck fixtures. parking gar-age and pa*ing lot lighting. Rebates will not be issued for sreet lighting. Most screw-in compact fluorcsccot lsmps (CFLS) arc rlot cligible for.cbates. 7. lamps or other equipmenl that have alr€ady been rebated through any other Xcel Energy rebate programs aIe heligible for a rebate under the One-Stop Efficiency Shopo. This includes upstream programs lhat provide incentives to manufacrurers, distributors and relailers to sell products at a discounted price. 8. CEE reserves the right to disallow a rebate ifit determines, in its sol€ .,udgrnc[t, that the lighting tcchnology is inappropriately applied or light levels arc inadequate. Contact you! CEE consulta[l !o determine qualification ofcustom or specialty lighting projects. 9. Equipment must be puchased. properly installed aEd fully operating prior to submitting an application for a rcbatc. V€ndor Responsibillti€s 10. Thc "Vendor" is any person or compaoy that is colsulting oo the projecl selling lhe project to rhe panicipan! completing the work and./or supplying the materials. Vendor is aa indepetrdeDt cotrtractor and trot ao agent or reprcsentative ofXcel Energy or CEE, has no authority to bind Xcel Energy or CEE, and is solely responsible for sub-contractors the Vendor hires to do some or all of the work and/or supply materials. I l. The verdor mtlst clearly communicate to the Panicipant the purpose and r€quirem€nts of the One-slop Efliciency Shopo, including eligibility requircments for lighting rcbales. The Vendor musl involve the CEE consultant in communications with the Pa.ticipall and must ke€p the CEE consultant tully informed regarding all details ofthe Fansaction. 12. Vcndors arc respoasible for reviewing, signing and retuming the Contractor Report to CEE before materials are ordered. By signing the Contractor Report, the Vendor rcpresents and warrants lhat the transaction complies with these Rules and Requiremenls and that the project specilications in lhe Contractor Report ar€ accumte, acceptable and will b€ installed as specified. 13. Any inaccuracies conceming project specifications must be reponed immediaiely to a CEE consultant so they can be addressed, rhe rebare recalculatcd if necessary and a revised repon issued to the Vendor and the Participant. 14. Vendor must contact a CEE consultant whenever there are changes to the project so that equipmelt eligibiiity can be confirmed snd the rebate value can be re-calculated ifnecessary. 15. CEE will not be responsible for changes in the rebatc value if the Vendor does not sign ard retum the ContEctor Report. and repon: inaccuracies in the Contractor Report; changes in lhe equipment to be inslsllcd: or changcs in the pmject during consBuctton. Rebgte Crlculations 16. Rebate values are based on CEE'S calculation ofelecr.ic demand (Kw) and energy (kwh) savings. Hours used for calculation ofthe kwh savings must be atr accuate rcpresetrtation ofthe Panicipalt's operating schedule. 17. Electric demand and energy savings are calculated usiog lighting efliciency baselines established by the Energy lndependence .nd Security Act (EISA). EISA standards apply to most Tl2 and incandcsccdt lighting techmlogies today, atrd will apply to othcr technologies as efficiency requirements continuc to be phased in. 18. If an Xcel Energy lighritrg rebate was previously assigned to this account and the rebated lighting was subsequently convened ro a less eflicient lighting system, a One-Stop consultant must review the situation to deteaminc the corr€ct bascline cncrgy use for calculating the rebale. 19. Rebates are based on the eDergy use ofthe equipment actually installed at the site and the Participant's Project Cost. Reb.tes will be recalculated ifthe final equipment and Participant's Project Cost is diffcreot thatr originally approved by CEE. 20. Rebates cannot exceed 60 percent of$c Panicipant's koject Cost, unless otherwise specilied by the One-Stop Efiiciency Shop6. The minimum rebate p.id is $5-00. 21. "Panicipa[t's Project Cost" means the Pariicipant's linancial obligation for the lighting refrofit based on the total project cost less any and all Deductions, regardless ofwhen these Deductions arc received. 0000r372Page 5 of6 Customer Repoi 04/07/2019 0E:16 PM Progrim lD# O\E-STOP EFFICIENCI' SHOP@ PROGRANI RULES and REQUIREI\{ENTS Pagc I of2 22. "Deductions" means an),thing ofvalue received by the Panicipa[t rhat reduces the Participant's actual out-of-pockel cost for the lighting retrofil including, but not limited to: labor or material donations: monetary donations: labor or material cost deductions; gmnls; awards, rebates; or any other assistance of monetary value provided, directly or indirectly. by the vendor, its agents or rcpresentatives to rEduce the Participant's actual financial obligation for the li8hting projccl. 23. The following lvpes offinancial transactions are not allowd as methods ofpayment by the Panicipa for the lighting project: barrer. in-kind donations and performance contracting. 24. All Dcductions must be sc?arately itemized on the final invoicc submifled to CEE. The Panicipant's Project Cost must be greater tban zero to receive a One-Stop Efliciency Shopo rebate. Invoice 25. The Vendor must submit an accurate. complcte and [ansparent final invoice for the compleled liShting retrofit. All panies involved in the projec! including the Panicipant and CEE, must have a clear underslanding ofthe scope ofwork and associared project costs, including any Dcductions thal have beer app[icd. 26. Invoice(s) submifted must include: (l) itemized quantity, manufacturer's make and model numbers for each material item, (2) a lump sum amount for both ma(erial and labor, and (3) grand total project cost. In some cases, original equipment manufacturer (OEM) spccilic6tion shcets may be requested for verification or clarification. 27. The Vendor must provide the Panicipaot a, invoice that rell€cts the same financial information that is submitted to CEE, iocluding any Deductions $at have been applied. rebate received by Pafiicipant mu$ be promptly rerumed to Xcel Energy 29. vcndor agccs to promptly provide CEE with such additional documentation and information as may be necessary to veriry complialce with these Rules and Requilements, such as copies of cancelled checks or other relevant receipts/records as proofthat the Psrticipant paid thc amount rcflccted on the invoice. Rebates for that projcct will not bc paid utrtil all rcquested documentation and information is provided and verified. Rebrt€ Appllcction lnd Pryment 30. One-Stop Efliciency Sho@ rules and rebate eligibility rcquiremcnts arE subjcct to change. It is the Participant's and Vendot's responsibility to ve ry with CEE that estimated rebates are still valid before commitling to. prchasing equipment for or implementing a project. CEE will not pay a rebate for projects where the invoice is submifted more than l2 months sncr thc $an of thc projecl. 3l . Xcel Energy aad CEE are nor rcsponsible for ary lost, late, stolen, ineligible, illegible, misdirected or postage{ue mail. All completed rebate applications atrd other submissioos il comectioo with the One- Srop Efiiciency Shop6 become the property ofXcel Energy and CEE and will not be rctumed. Yeriftcrtion Discrri'crr 28. CEE reserves $e righ to insp€ct Participanls facility(ies) for Xcel EnErgy and CEE: insEllation ofmatenals listed on this rebare aDDlication and will need access ro survey rhe irstalled project. Parti'ciilIi;; i*p " ;;Lf J9 .Do not endorse aay particular vendor, oarufactuer' product or any and all types ofequipmeot reooved for i pe;oa ortlfu (r) monttrs system,design by offering these rebates; afttr rcceiving a rcbati riom xcet energy. ifd",".p*ti- ait"..."t 40 Willnot be rcsPonsible for ary tax liability imposcd on thc thar Panicipa;r did not comply wirh the-se Ruli" *in"qrir".*t.. *y Panicipant as a result ofthe payme of reb'lesl 32. In cases ofdefenEd payment. CEE reserves the right to process the rebate only when full palment is received by the vcndor fiom the Participant. All financed and altemate payrnent plans musl bc documented with detailed. legally obligating and signed contracts. CEE reserves the right to disaltow atry paymeot plan that ils stsffdetermhes is not in compliance with the program design int€nt and tules. 33. Rebates will not b€ disbursed until the ptojcct is fully installcd and verified. 34. The rebate cherk will be sent to the Participant (i.e., xcel Enerry accoult holder) listed on the rebate applicatio& unless othen is€ authorized by CEE. Xcel Energy will issue rebates in the form ofchecks, oot utility bitl credis. J5. Once completed paperwork is submitted and approved, rcbate paymcnts are usually made in 6 to 8 week. Specisl liotices 36. xccl Encrgy and CEE resewe thc right to rcfuse paymol or participation in the One-Stop EfEciency Shop@ ifthe Participart or vendor violates progmm design intent. rules and procedures. Xcel Energy and CEE are not liable foi r€bates prornised to Participants as a rcsult ofa Vendor misrepresentiag the program. 37. The One-Stop Elficiency Sho@ is subject to 60 days notice of cancellation. Thc Participant and Vendor are responsiblc for chccking with a CEE consultant to determine whether the program is still in effect and lo veriry progmm requiremms. ]E. CEE RXSf,RVES THE RIGHT TO DISQUALIFY NON. COMPLIANT VENDORS FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE ONE.STOP ETTICIENCY SIIOFD. 4I. EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. AND ANY IMPLTED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE W1TH RESPECT TO AiIY PRODUCTS, EQt IPMENT, MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP PROVIDED, SUPPLIED OR INSTALLED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ONE.STOP EFFICIENCY SHOP@. warranties. ifany, arc betweea Participant and equipment manufacturer (s) and/or vendors. 42. Arc nor responsible for the disposal ofremoved lighling equipmenl (lamps, ballasts and/or fixtures) replaced as a rcsult of lhis program, when rcquired for optimum lightiDg performarcc; 43. lo no event shall be liable for any indirect, special. incidental, consequential or punidve damages arising out ofor relating to administering the One-Stop Efficiercy Shop@; 44. Do not guarantee that a specific level ofenogy or cost savings will result frorD the implementation of energy cotrsfivation measures or tbe use of producs funded under this program. Fd llle '.lm.nd. dl6.l CEE rtnsl.: 1612) 2a+2127 Far (612) 33t5888. Mdr Tor Canbr L. Emry! ard Efrirmnslt 212 3r! av.m Ndth, sdb 560 cee;O CEE FACET, P.!96h Rul,$ * 130326 0000 t 3 7204/07/2019 08:16 PM Program lDt ONE-STOP EFFICIENCY SHOP@ PROGRAI\I RULES and REQUIRENIENTS ,\ lllinncsotlr ( onsen'ation Improi'ement Progrtrnl (ClP) ()rfercd bl Ccntcr for Energl and Enlironment l':lg( I of2 Page 6 of6 Customer Repon @ XcelEnergy'O n e ..St op Effi cie n cy S hop@ Building Energt Elliciency Progamtttt0tttata aY t rolt. Lighting System Analysis Cost Saving Recommendations Customer Report April 7,2019 Property Ad&ess: City Of Chanhassen/Public Works 7901 Park Pt Chanhassen, MN 553 l7 Prepared for: Jill Sinclair City Of Chanhassen/Public Works 7901 Park Pl Chanhassen, MN 55317 Ph:952-227-1133 00027605 cee" Prepared by Lighting Specialist: Erik Ennen Center for Energy and Environment 2 I 2 3rd Averue North, Suite 560 Minncspolis, MN 55401 Mobile: Phone: Fax: E-mail: (612) 819-'124s (612) 335-5888 ccnnen@mnccc-org - Audits - Finoncing - Contraclors - Rebsles Program Coordinator: Kristen Funk Center for Energy and Environment 212 3rd Avenue North, Suitc 560 Minneapolis, Mioresota 5540 I 6t2-335-348't 612-335-5888 kfunk@mncee.org Phone: Fax: E-mail: Page I of6 Customer Repon 0410'7 /2019 06:54 PM Progr.m lDt @ xcetEnergy'One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ Summary of Recommended Lighting UpgradesiEl?0ttt!tE 3Y ilTUtt. Lighting Upgrades Estimated Costs Estimated Annual Savings Pevback Total Installed Cost Belore rebote $36,745.00 YOUr Final Cost Afier rebue 4 Rebate equals 2695 ofinstalled cost. $27,060.94 ( I ncluding sp ecial orders) $9,395.25 *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or bv 12/31/2019, vhichever comes firc|. One-Slop reserves lhe righ, to $'ithdraw this rebale oler arter expirqtion. You may request an ettension, which includes re-veiJication of eligibility, kly/kl{h savings, installatiott costs, estimated rebale, and program rules by One-Stop. $9,684.06 CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $7g2.94(") Monthly loan payments at3.gyofor 37 month term $791.19&) (b) Estimste based on a loan amount of 52?.331.55, including I $270.61 loan processing fee. Mongage, flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 ycars, with monthly Paymcnls not less than lhe estimaled monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. 3.1 years (lnduding Lo.n Financing Charg.s) Utility Cost Analysis Demand (KW) Energy (K\ h) Annurl Cost CO2 (tbsf Existing Lights New Lights 65.981 31.M2 l36,r58 65,t77 s 18,071.42 $8,676.17 23 1.469 t 10,800 Estimated Savings 34.s39 70,981 $9J95.2s (a) I 20,669' * How do CO2 emissions affect rhe and my business? 1l Rising concentrations oI greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an in(rease in the average surface temperature olthe Earth over time- Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation panemt storm s6/eraty, and sea level commonly relerred to as 'climate change.' I Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and tour groups of fluorinated 9a5e5 (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCS and CFCS) are the major GHG. ln the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from .oal-1tred electricity geneEtion comp se nearly 80 percent o{ the tolal CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. I lnstalling energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conse ation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduaes GHG emmissions and mitigates globalclimate change. Read more at wwl .eia.doe.gov or wv/w.epa.gov (a) Savings estimalcs arc bascd on standard cngineering calculations and arc NOT guara eed. YouI actual savi-Dgs may be higher or lower depending on various faoors, including how you op€rate your ligits and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0630/KWh and $ 13.30/KW. where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summe. months peak rate houls of9am to hm. (ll [00.00 ] [0] [00.00] [00] [True] [30.8a6Kw] ) City Of Chanha Works 104 r 8372500027605Page 2 of6 Customer Report (04/07/2019 06:54 PM) Pm8lam ID{ Xcel Acct,7901 Park Pl Chanhassen. MN 55317 (a)2.9 years Utilitv Rebate* o Xcel Energy'One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ Recommended Lighting Proj ectsiaSroitrr!r tY ilTUtE. Recommended Lighting System Upgrades Schedule Iiame & Hours/year of Operetion lnstalled Cost Estimated Annurl Savings Select Proiccc #l Exterior 4,380 hrsrr (Night-Only) t'10,098.81 fncl speial order t823.68 s otv 15 9 Wrtt! EXlSTlt{G Luminairc 2S5 MH 250W STD1 lL 't30 MH 100w sTDl '11 aty 15 I W!ii. }{EtrV Lumiilaire 150 LEO Area Lighl '150W 40 LED 40W New Wall Pack Fixtu.e PrcjccA *2 15 miny'rk 13 hrs/yr (Night-Only) 3990.78 lncl Special Ordcr s0.58 4 W.tlr EXISTING Luminaire 454 MH 4OOW STD1 ,11 Qtv Wallt l{EW Luminaire 100 LED 100W 1L-NowFix otv 2 Project: *3 6x06 1,817 h.s/,rt t9,585.17 Incl Special Ordcr 72,214.02 g WatG EXISTING Luminaire 64 T5 4',0028W E2 2L atv 249 otv 249 Watta l{EW Lumin.iro 32 LEO 016iW LinearT$dBallast4' 2L Project lrl 6106 \8r,hl'/.yr 116.069.2a Itrcl Spocial der i03s6.97 qtv 123 watt! ExlsTlNG Luminair. 354 T5 HO 4' 54 EZ4{L-&isl atv Wdr. NEW Lumlnairg 168 LEO 028W Linear-TwBallast-4' 6L TOIAIS (lncluding special orders)$36,745.00 $9,395.25 304183725 City Of Chanhassen/Public Worls 7901 Park Pl Chanhassen. MN 55317 Progr:m lD4 Xcel Acc-t# EE@Page 3 of 6 Customer Report (M107 12019 M:54 PM) Area A: Exterior LED Retrofit Area B: Offices, Halls Area C: Truck Bay, Mainitenance g @ xcetEnergy' iEi?of,3tBLE lt i^TUtt. One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ Customer Participation Agreement l, the undersigned, agee that to the be$ ofmy knowledge the lighting schcdule below accwately describes how the lights are operated at the facility listed in this document. I undentand that the energSr or cost savings reflected in this analysis arc estimates, and that Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) and Xcel Energy do not guarantee that a sp€cific levcl ofenergy or cost savings will result from the implementation ofenergy conservation measures or the use ofproducts funded under this program. I atso give CEE permission to submit, on my behalf, all Xcel Energy rebate and financing forms required for the One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ program. I undeBtand that CEE and its staff do not perform lighting installation services. I agree to have CEE contact a participating contractor who will contact me to schedule a time to perform a walk-through inspection, and, ifl agree to hire the conFactor, !o schedule a time to complete the lighting installations that are checked under the "Selected" column ofthis document. I understand that I must enter into a separate agreement with the contncror to receive lighting installation services. I undeNtand that cont'dctors generally perform installation during weekdays and labor will be charged accordingly. I understand that the contractor will provide a one-year warranty on all labor and equipment that will be installed as part ofthis program and that the terms ofthe warranty will be pan ofmy agrccmcnt with the contractor. I undelstand that thc connactor alonc, and not CEE, provides a warranty on the installatiofl services. I further understand that a[[ electrical code violations that are found during a contracto/s inspection or during installation must be brought up to code at my expense. Costs for corccting code violations arc NOT included in the installation costs quoted in this document. By signing below I certiry that I have read, understand and will comply with the attached One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ RLTLES and REQUIREMENTS, and that I car not apply for other rebates offered by Xcel Energy or any other energy-efficienry program towards lamps or lighting work covered by this agreement. Select One I Financed I Cash Signaturc Jill Sinclair Date Customer Cost: 527,060.94 (lncluding special orders) Lighting Schedules Your lighting savings are based on the following average hours of operation Lighting Schedule Name Mon Tucs Wcd Thur Fri Sat Sun 0.1 hrs 0.1 hrs 0.1 hrs 0.r hrs 6106 1,877 hrtyr 6.0 hrs 6.0 hrs 6-0 hrs 6.0 hrs 6.0 hrs 6.0 hrs Ext€rior 4.380 hrtyr 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs ll.0 hrs t2.0 hls 12.0 hrs 12.0 hrs 7901 Park Pl chanhassen, MN 55317 anlty Program l[)f Xcel Acd# Works 104183725@Page 4 of6 Customer Report (04/07/2019 06:54 PM) I5 rhir/wk 13 hrvyr 0-l hrs O\E-STOP EFFICIENCY SHOPG) PROGRAII RULES and REQUIRENIENTS I'rgr I of2 The Ooe-Stop Efficiency Shop@O lighting efliciency program (One-Stop Elficicncy Shopo), administered by Center for Energy and Environment ("CEE ') and fundcd through Xcel Energy. offers cash rebates to eligible small business customers ("Pariicipanf') who purchase and install qualifying anergy-eflicient lighting producls in existing buildirgs. The intent ofthe One-Stop Efficiency Shop@ operating as a Minnesota Conservation lmprovement Progam (CIP), is to incentivize Xcel Energy's customeG to iDsrall ercrry emcie equipmeot earlier than they would have otherwise by defraying a ponion ofthe cost ofthe retrofit To eNure thal the program opc.atcs as intcndc4 thc Paiicipaflt must hsvc I financial strkc in thc transaction and the Participant's Project Cost must b€ greater than zero to receive a One-Stop Efficiency Shop0 rcbate. P.rticiprnt Qualifi crtlons One-Srop Elficiency Shopo rebates apply only to qualified Xcel Energy customets with a valid commercial electric accoutrt in Xcel EnerSy's Minnesota service tenitory th meet One-Stop Efiiciency Shopo eligibility requirements. The Vendor or Participant must veriry with a CEE cons\rltaot that atr Xcel EDerglr accomt is eligible for Otr+Stop Effrciency Shop@ rebates before committing to, purchasing cquipoent for ot impfementing a project. To determine ifa business qualifies for thc One-Stop Efticicncy Shop@ please contact CF,E at (612124+2421. f, ligibility Requirements l. Rebate iteEs Eust be iD$alled at the Xccl Energy clccu'ic accouat lised on the application. 2. All equipment must be net{. Used or rcbuilt equipment is not cligible for a rebate. 3. All removed lighting equipmcnt (lamps, ballasts and 6xhtrca) must bc properly recycled. aad cannor be sold or reused at alothe. location. Documenration may be required to ensure compliance with proper disposal of equipment. 4. Energy-efticient equipment must result in an electric load reducrion. 5. Xcel Energy and CEE recommend llluminating Engineering Society (IES) light levels. Panicipant is responsible for approval offinal light levels. 6. Rebates are offered for interior lightinS, exterior ca[opy lightilg. soffit fixtures, wall pack fixtues. parking gratage and pa*ing lot lighting. Rebates will not be issued for streer lighling. Most screrv-ih compact fluorescent lamps (CFLS) arc not cligiblc for rcbatcs. ?. l.amps or other equipment that have aheady been rcbated through any other Xcel Energy rebate programs are ioeligible for a rebate under the One-Stop Efficiency Shop6l. This includes upstream programs that provide incentives to manufactuErs, distriburors and retailers to sell producE at a discou ed pric.. 8. CEE resen es th€ right to disallow a rcbate if it determines, in its sole judgmcn! that the lighting technology is inappropriately applied or light levels are irEdequate. Contact your CEE consultant to detemine qualification of custom or specialry lighting pmjects. 9- Equipment must be purchase4 properly iNulled aod fully ogerating prior to submining an application for a rcbatc. VeDdor Responsibiliti€s 10. The "Ve oi' is any persoo or compaoy thar is coDslllting o! the Eoject, selling $e project to rhe panicipaar, completing the work and/or supplying the materials. Veodor is ar iodepodeDt cotrtractor and oot an agent or repres€ntative ofxcel Energy or CEE. has no authority to bind Xcel Energy or CEE, and is sol€ly rcsponsiblc for sub-contractors the Vendor hircs to do some or all of the work aod/or supply materials. I L The Vendo. must clea y commuoicate to the Panicipant rhe purpose atd requireDeds ofthe One-Stop Eflicicncy Shop@, itrcluding eligibility requiremenB for lightin8 .ebates. The Vendor must involve the CEE consultalt in communicatioN with the Panicipart, and ,nust keep the CEE consultant fully informed regarding all details ofthe Iransaction. 12. Vendors are rcsponsible for rcviewing, signing and rctuming the Contractor Repon to CEE before materials are ordered. By signing the Contractor Repon, the Vendor represents and wafiants that the transaction complies with these Rules and RequiremeDts and that the project specifications in the Contractor Repofl are accurate, acceptable and will be installed as specified. ll. Any inaccu.racies concemi.g Foject sp€cifications must be reported immediately to a CEE consultant so they can be addressed, the rebate rec.lculated if necessary and a revised repon issued to the Vendor and rhe Panicipan!. 14. Vendor must contact a CEE consultant vhenever there are changes lo thc project so that equipmeDt eligibility can be confirmed and the rebate valuc can bc re{alculated ifnecessary. 15. CEE will not be responsible for changes iD the rebate value ifthe Vendor does not sign and retum the Contraclor Report. and repon: inaccuracies in lhe Contractor Repo( changes in the equipment to be inslallcd: or changes in the projecr during construcrion. Rebste Crlculations 16. Rebate values 8re based on CEE'S calculation of elecrric dernaod (KW) and energy (kwh) savings. Hours used for calculation ofthe kwh ssvilgs must be all accurate representation ofthe Participant's oper.ting schedule. 17. Electric demand and eoergy savhgs arc calculated using lighting efficiency baselines established by the Ener8y Independence and S€curity Acl (EISA). EISA standards apply to most Tl2 and inc$descent lighting tcchnologics today, aad will apply to other technologies as efficiency requirements continue to be phased in. 18. tfan Xcel Energy lighting rebate was previously assigned to this account and the reba(ed lighting was subs€quently convened to a less eflicienl lighting syslem. a One-Stop consultant must review the situation to determine tie correct baseline energy use for calculating the rebate- 19. Rebates arc based on the energy use ofthe equipment actually installed at the site and the Panicipant's Project Cost- Rebatcs will be recalculated ifthe {inal equipment and Panicipanl's Projcct Cost is differenl than originally approved by CEE. 20. Rebates cannot exceed 60 percent ofthe Panicipant's Project Cost, unless otherwise specified by the One-Stop Efficiency Shop@- The mirimum rcbate paid is $5.00. 21. "Panicipant's Project Cost" means the Participant's financial obligation for lhe lighting retrofit based on the total project cost less any and all Deductions, regardless ofwhen these Deductions are received. 0002760sPage 5 of6 Customer Repon M/01 /2019 06:54 PM Program lD# .\ IIinnr\olrr (insrrr0lir)n lnrprorcnrcnl l'rolrum {( ll') ()ff('rrd hr (-cnlcr lbr fncrg\ :rnd Enrironmcnt 22. "Deductions" means anything ofvalue received by the Participant that reduces the Participant's actual out-of-pockel cost for the lighting retrofit including, but not limited tor labor or material donationsl mooetary donatiotrs; labor or rDaterial cost deductions; gmtrts; awards. rebates; or any other assisEmce of monetary value provided, directly or indirectly. by the vendor, its agents or representatives to r€duce the Paflicipant's actual fi]lancial obligation for thc lightilg projcct. 23. The following types offinancial transactions are not allowed as methods of payment by $e Panicipanr for the lighting project: baner. rn-kind donalions and performance confacting. 24. All Deductions musl be scparately itcmizcd on thc {inal invoicc submited to CEE. The Participant's Projcct Cost must bc grcatcr than zero to receive a One-Stop EfTici€ncy Shopo rebate. Invoicc 25. The Vendor must submit an accumte. complete and transparent final invoice for the compleled lighting retrolit. All panies involved in the project iDcluding the Panicipant and CEE. must have a clear understanding ofthe scope ofwork and associated project costs, including any Dcductions that havc be+n applied. 26. tnvoice(s) submined must include: ( I ) itemized quantity. manufactEer's make and model numbers for each malerial ilem, (2) a lump sum amount for both marerial and labor, and (3) grand tor.l project cost. In some fi$es, original equipment manufacmrer (OEM) specification sheets may be requested for verification or clarification. 27. The Veodor must provide the Panicipant an invoice that reflects the sarne financial information that is submitted to CEE, including any Deductions that have been applied. Verilicetion 28. CEE reserves the right lo insp€cr Participanr's facility(ies) for installation of materials listed on rhis rebate application 0nd will need access to suwey the installed projed. Panicipanl must keep a sa$ple of any and all g?es ofequipme retnoved for a period ofthrc€ (3) months after rccciving a rcbatc fiom Xccl Energy. If thc insp€ction dctmincs that Participant did troi comply with thcse Rules and Requircoells. ary 29. Vendor age€s to promptly providc CEE wth such additio[al documentation and information as may be necessary to veriry coEplialce with these Rules and Requiremenrs, such as copies of cancelled check or other relevant receipt$/rccords as proofthat the Panicipait paid the amount reflccted on thc invoicc. Rcbaics for that project witl not be paid until all rcquested documentation and information is provided and verified. Rebate Applicrtion rnd Pryment 30. Onc-Stop Efficiency Shopo rules and rebate eligibility requirements are subject to chatrgc. It is the Panicipanls and Vcodofs responsibility to veri& with CEE that estimaled rebates are still valid before committing to, purchasing equipment for or illrplementing a project. CEE will not pay a rebate for projects wherc the invoicc is submined morc lhan l2 months aRer lhe shrr ofthc projclt. 31. Xcel Encrgy and CEE are not rcsponsible for any lost, late. stolen. ineligible. illegible, misdirectedorpostagedue mail. All completed rebare applications aod other submissions in connection with the One- Stop Erficiency Shopo become the property ofXcel Energy and CEE and will not be rerurned. 32. ln cases ofdeferred payment, CEE rcserves th€ right to process the rebate only when full payment is received by the Vendor from the Participant- All financed and altemate payment plans must be documen(ed with detailed. legally obligadng and signed contracts. CEE reserves the right lo disallow any payment plan that irs staffdetermines is not in compliance with the program design inlent and rules. 33. Rebates will not be disbuned until the project is ftlly installed and verified. 34. The rebate check will be sent to the Participanr (i.e., Xcel Energy account holder) listed on the rebate application, ualess otherwise authorized by CEE. Xccl Encrgy will issue rebates in the form ofchecks, oot utility bill credits. 35. Once complered p.perwork is submitted and approved, rebate paymenrs are usually made in 6lo 8 weeks. Specisl Notices 36. Xccl L.ncrg) and CEE reserve the right to rcfusc paymenr or participation in thc Onc-Stop Efficiency Shop@ ifthe Participant or Vendor violates program design intent. rules and procedues. Xcel Energy and CEE ale not liable for.ebates promised to Participants as a rcsult of a Vendor misrcpresetrtitrg the progam. 37. The One-Stop Erficiency Sho@ is subject to 60 days lotice of cancellation. Thc Participant ard Veldor arc rcsponsible for ch€cking u ith a CEE consultant to determine whether the program is still in effect and to verifu program rcquircmeos. 3E. CEE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO DISQUALITY NON- COMPLIANT VENDORS FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE ONE.STOP EITICIENCY SHOBD. Dischimer3 Xcel Energy ard CEE: 39. Do not endorse any particlrl& veodo!, Eaoufacturer, product or system design by offering th6e reb6les; 40. Will not bc respoasible for aoy tax liability imposcd on the Participant as a rcsult ofrhe paymenr of rebates; OR IMPLIED. AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PTJR}OSE WTIH RESPECT TO AI\TY PRODUCTS, EQI.NPMENT, MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP PROVIDED. SUPPLIED OR INSTALLED IN CONNECTION WITH THE ONE.STOP EFFICIENCY SHOED. Warranties. ifany, are between Participant and equipmeot manufacturer (s) and/or Vendors. 42. Are not responsible for the disposal ofrcmoved lightitrg equipme (lamps, b.llasts .nd/or fixtures) rcplaced as a rcsult ofthis plogram, when rcquircd for optimum lighting performance; 43. In no event shall be liable for any indirecr, special, incidental, consequential or punitive damages arising out of or rclating to adminisreri.ng the One-Stop Efficiemy Shop@: 44. Do not guarantee that a specific level ofenergy or cost savings will result from the implementation of energy coNervatioD measues or the use of products funded under this program. rebate received by Participatt must be promptly rcomed ro xcel En"tB 4 r . ExpREssLy DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES. E)GRESSED Fd Me 'rlm.!d, @t ci CEE .l Phon€, (612) 2.+2.2, F.x (6t2) 33t5888. M.ll To: C.nt . lor Emrgy d EfriE.trEn 212 3nl Av.N tidth, Sdt 560 cee aa CEE FACET, ProqEn Rul6* 130326 Page 6 of6 Customer Report 04/0712019 06:54 PM O\E-STOP EFFICIENCY SHOP@ PROGRAI\{ RULES and REQUIREIIENTS A l\Iinnesota Consen'ation Impro|emsnl Progranr (CIP) ()ffercd h! Ccntcr lor Encrgt and Enr-ironment Prgo : of 2 r.oera.lo*@ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Approval of Temporary On­Sale Liquor License, St. Hubert Catholic Community, Cana Dinner on February 15, 2020 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.9. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ St. Huberts PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the temporary on­sale liquor license request from St. Hubert Catholic Community for their Cana Dinner on  February 15, 2020. The fee for said license will be $1.00.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY St. Hubert Catholic Community has submitted an application for a temporary on­sale liquor license for their annual Cana Dinner on  February 15. The event will be held at the church and they intend to sell beer and wine with dinner. Liquor liability insurance has been provided for the event. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request from St. Hubert Catholic Community for a temporary on­sale liquor license for their Cana Dinner on February 15, 2020. The fee is $1.00. ATTACHMENTS: Application Alcohol & Gambling Enlorcemorl Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651 -201 -7500 Fax 651-297 -5259 TTY 65 1 -282-6555 APPTICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR TICENSE Date o anized City State Name of or nization Address Name of rson maki lication Date(s) ofevent February 15,2020 o anization officer's name Tax exempt number 8567927 zi hanhassen lvlinnesota hone Home one City State zi Code Chanhassen Minnesola nization officer's name State zi Code MN o anization officer's name State zi Code nization officer's name ci State zi MN lfthe applicant willcontractfor intoxicating liquor semice give the name and address ofthe liquor license providing the service. lfthe applicant willcarry liquor liability insu:.ance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage cM8569 APPROVAL APPI.ICAIION MUST BE APPROVED BY CTTY ON COUNTY BEFORE SUBMTNNGTO ALCOHOL AND GAMELING ENFORCEMENT ci C Hubert Catholic Community 1865 317 olly Ryan 52-374-5040 Fr. Rolf Tollefson Clty or Countiapproving the license Date Approved Fee Amount Permit Date Date Fee Paid City or County E-mail Address ajty or Count"honaXumber Signature City Clerk or County fficial Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement C.ERKS NOi-lc[: Subrnit tlr ir form to Al(ohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E.MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CI'Y/COUNTY AS ALLTEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVATS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION@sTATE,ITIN.US !r\gl/ Code 3201 Main Street Business Type of organization D Microdistillery [ Small Brewer I Club ! Charitable E] Religious E Other non-profit MN Code Location where permit will be u5ed. lf an outdoor area, describe. Our annual Cana Dinner held onsite in our Fellowship Hall CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Consider Approval of Slow No­Wake Ordinance for Lake Lucy, Lake Minnewashta, Lotus Lake, and Lake Susan Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1. Prepared By Ryan Pinkalla, Water Resources Technician and Todd Hoffman, Parks & Recreation Director File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the draft ordinance amending Section 6­49 which establishes water levels at which slow no­wake restrictions apply for Lotus Lake, Lake Lucy, Lake Minnewashta, and Lake Susan.  This ordinance also gives the Public Works Director the authority to enforce the elevations when the water levels exceed these elevations. Recommended changes to the slow no­wake elevations for each lake are: Lotus Lake:  896.30 Lake Lucy:  957.24 Lake Minnewashta:  945.00 Lake Susan:  Remains unchanged (882.50) Approval requires a Majority Vote of the entire council. BACKGROUND Chanhassen City Code Chapter 6 Boats and Waterways, currently establishes slow no­wake elevations and processes for two lakes, Lotus Lake (896.80) and Lake Susan.  Due to increased precipitation in recent years, public concerns have been raised regarding shoreline erosion during high water as a result of wave action.  A meeting was held October 16, 2019 to receive public input.  Staff is recommending City Council to approve an ordinance amending Section 6­49 Slow no­wake areas, of the Chanhassen City Code to include Lake Minnewashta and Lake Lucy, and modify the emergency slow no­wake elevation on Lotus Lake. This section also gives the Public Works Director the authority to place the slow no­wake restriction into effect when water levels reach the designated levels outlined in the attached ordinance. Following Council action, this ordinance amendment will be submitted to the Minnesota DNR for their consideration during a 120­day review period. DISCUSSION Chanhassen City Code currently only establishes slow no­wake elevations on Lotus Lake and Lake Susan. The purpose of this regulation would be to minimize shoreline erosion during periods of high water when the shoreline is most susceptible to erosion caused by wave action. With the increased precipitation in recent years, lake levels are consistently sitting at higher levels than they have historically. The current no­wake level on Lotus Lake was still not CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectConsider Approval of Slow No­Wake Ordinance for Lake Lucy, Lake Minnewashta, LotusLake, and Lake SusanSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1.Prepared By Ryan Pinkalla, Water ResourcesTechnician and Todd Hoffman, Parks &Recreation Director File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the draft ordinance amending Section 6­49 which establishes water levels at which slowno­wake restrictions apply for Lotus Lake, Lake Lucy, Lake Minnewashta, and Lake Susan.  This ordinance alsogives the Public Works Director the authority to enforce the elevations when the water levels exceed theseelevations. Recommended changes to the slow no­wake elevations for each lake are:Lotus Lake:  896.30Lake Lucy:  957.24Lake Minnewashta:  945.00Lake Susan:  Remains unchanged (882.50)Approval requires a Majority Vote of the entire council.BACKGROUNDChanhassen City Code Chapter 6 Boats and Waterways, currently establishes slow no­wake elevations andprocesses for two lakes, Lotus Lake (896.80) and Lake Susan.  Due to increased precipitation in recent years, publicconcerns have been raised regarding shoreline erosion during high water as a result of wave action.  A meeting washeld October 16, 2019 to receive public input.  Staff is recommending City Council to approve an ordinanceamending Section 6­49 Slow no­wake areas, of the Chanhassen City Code to include Lake Minnewashta and LakeLucy, and modify the emergency slow no­wake elevation on Lotus Lake. This section also gives the Public WorksDirector the authority to place the slow no­wake restriction into effect when water levels reach the designated levelsoutlined in the attached ordinance. Following Council action, this ordinance amendment will be submitted to theMinnesota DNR for their consideration during a 120­day review period.DISCUSSIONChanhassen City Code currently only establishes slow no­wake elevations on Lotus Lake and Lake Susan. Thepurpose of this regulation would be to minimize shoreline erosion during periods of high water when the shoreline is most susceptible to erosion caused by wave action. With the increased precipitation in recent years, lake levels are consistently sitting at higher levels than they have historically. The current no­wake level on Lotus Lake was still not reached in 2019, one of the wettest years on record. These are recreational lakes that maintain traffic throughout the boating season.   RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending City Council approve the draft ordinance amending Section 6­49 which establishes water levels at which slow no­wake restrictions apply for Lotus Lake, Lake Lucy, Lake Minnewashta, and Lake Susan.  This ordinance also gives the Public Works Director the authority to enforce the restrictions when water levels exceed these elevations. The recommended changes to slow no­wake elevations for each lake are: Lotus Lake:  896.30 Lake Lucy:  957.24 Lake Minnewashta:  945.00 Lake Susan:  Remains unchanged (882.50) ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance Amendment Redlined City Code Section 6­49 Comment Cards From Public Input Meeting Slow No­Wake Public Hearing Meeting 10­16­19 Notes Timeline 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6, BOATS AND WATERWAYS OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6-49 of the Chanhassen City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 6-49. - Slow-no wake areas. (a) No person shall operate a watercraft in any marked slow-no wake areas in excess of slow-no wake speed. Slow-no wake areas shall be marked in accordance with the applicable regulations of the state department of natural resources. The location and boundaries of each slow-no wake area established are shown on that certain map entitled Water Surface Use Zoning Map of Chanhassen dated July 11, 1983, on file in the city hall. The map and all notations, references and data thereon are hereby incorporated by reference into this article and shall have the same force and effect as if fully set forth and described herein. (b) Slow-no wake restrictions. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no person shall operate a watercraft at greater than slow-no wake speed on the following lakes at any time when the water level exceeds the following elevation: Lake Water Level at Which Slow-No Wake Restrictions Apply Lotus Lake (10000600) Ordinary High Water Level of 896.3’ Lake Lucy (10000700) FEMA 100 Yr. Flood Elevation (2018) 957.24’ Lake Minnewashta (10000900) Level of 945.0’ Lake Susan (10001300) Level of 882.5’ (2) The Slow-No Wake restrictions in paragraph 1 will be put in place by the Public Works Director when the water level at which Slow-No Wake restrictions apply is met. Such restrictions shall be removed by the Public Works Director after the water level has remained below the water level at which Slow-No Wake restrictions apply for three consecutive days. (3) It shall be the responsibility of the City to provide adequate notification of the public of a slow-no wake restriction, which will include placement of a sign at each public watercraft access, notice on the City of Chanhassen web page and notice to the Carver County Sherriff’s Department. 2 (4) Restrictions shall not apply to a seaplane during take-off or landing, or watercraft utilized for emergency response. (c) Upon the placement of a slow-no wake restriction, notice will be given: (1) On a sign posted at the public access. (2) On the City of Chanhassen web page. (3) On the City of Chanhassen Surface Water Hotline. (4) On the Community Cable Access Channel. (5) In an e-mail to representative of applicable lake association if known. (6) To the Carver County Sherriff’s Department. (7) In the case of Lake Riley, in a communication to the Public Works Director for the City of Eden Prairie. (8) To the public by other means as may be deemed appropriate by council. (d) Watercraft utilized by resource management, emergency and enforcement personnel, when acting in the performance of their assigned duties, shall be exempt from the provisions of this section. (e) Part (c) shall not apply to float planes during takeoff or landing but shall apply while taxiing. (f) Enforcement. The enforcement of this Section shall be the primary responsibility of the Carver County Sheriff’s Office. Other licensed peace officers, including conservation officers of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources are also authorized to enforce the provisions of this section. Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage, publication, and approval by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. PASSED AND ADOPTED this , 2020 by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota. Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor Page 1 Sec. 6-49. - Slow-no wake areas. (a) No person shall operate a watercraft in any marked slow-no wake areas in excess of slow-no wake speed. Slow-no wake areas shall be marked in accordance with the applicable regulations of the state department of natural resources. The location and boundaries of each slow-no wake area established are shown on that certain map entitled Water Surface Use Zoning Map of Chanhassen dated July 11, 1983, on file in the city hall. The map and all notations, references and data thereon are hereby incorporated by reference into this article and shall have the same force and effect as if fully set forth and described herein. Emergency slow-no wake areas may be established by resolution of the city council and It shall be the responsibility of the Public Works Director marked in accordance with the appropriate regulations of the state department of natural resources and posted at all public accesses. (b) Slow-no wake restrictions. (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, no person shall operate a watercraft at greater than slow-no wake speed on the following lakes at any time when the water level exceeds the following elevation: Lake Water Level at Which Slow-No Wake Restrictions Apply Lotus Lake (10000600) Ordinary High Water Level of 896.8’ 896.3’ Lake Lucy (10000700) FEMA 100 Yr. Flood Elevation (2018) 957.24’ Lake Minnewashta (10000900) 10% Chance Occurrence Level of 945.0’ Lake Susan (10001300) 882.5’ (2) The Slow-No Wake restrictions in paragraph 1 will be put in place by the Public Works Director any time when the water level at which Slow-No Wake restrictions apply is met or exceeded for three consecutive days. Such restrictions shall be removed by the Public Works Director after the water level has remained below the water level at which Slow-No Wake restrictions apply for three consecutive days. (3) It shall be the responsibility of the City to provide adequate notification of the public of a slow-no wake restriction, which will include placement of a sign at each public watercraft access, notice on the City of Chanhassen web page and notice to the Carver County Sherriff’s Department. (4) Restrictions shall not apply to a seaplane during take-off or landing, or watercraft utilized for emergency response. (c) Upon the placement of a slow-no wake restriction, notice will be given: (1) On a sign posted at the public access. (2) On the City of Chanhassen web page. (3) On the City of Chanhassen Clean Water Hotline (4) On the Community Cable Access Channel. (5) In an e-mail to representative of applicable lake association if known. (6) To the Carver County Sherriff’s Department. (7) In the case of Lake Riley, in a communication to the Public Works Director for the City of Eden Prairie (8) To the public by other means as may be deemed appropriate by council. Page 2 (d) Watercraft utilized by resource management, emergency and enforcement personnel, when acting in the performance of their assigned duties, shall be exempt from the provisions of this section. (e) Part (c) shall not apply to float planes during takeoff or landing but shall apply while taxiing. (f) Enforcement. The enforcement of this Section shall be the primary responsibility of the Carver County Sheriff’s Office. Other licensed peace officers, including conservation officers of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources are also authorized to enforce the provisions of this section. (g) (1) Lotus Lake: All persons shall operate watercraft at a slow-no wake speed on Lotus Lake whenever the water elevation meets or exceeds the 100-year predicted level flood elevation for Lotus Lake of 896.8 MSL as set forth in the 1994 Surface Water Management Plan. The slow-no wake surface zoning shall remain in place until the water elevation drops below the 100-year flood elevation of 896.8 MSL for three consecutive days. Upon the placement of a slow-no wake restriction, notice will be given: a. On a sign posted at the public access. b. On the City of Chanhassen web page. c. On the City of Chanhassen Clean Water Hotline. d. On the Community Cable Access Channel. e. In an e-mail format to known representatives on Lotus Lake. f. To the Carver County Sheriff's Department. g. To the public by other appropriate means determined by council. (2) Lake Susan: All persons shall operate watercraft at a slow-no wake speed on Lake Susan whenever the water elevation exceeds 882.5. The slow-no wake surface zoning will remain in place until the water level drops below 882.5 for 72 hours three consecutive days. Upon placement of a slow no-wake restriction notice will be given: a. On a sign posted at the public access. b. On the City of Chanhassen web page. c. On the City of Chanhassen Clean Water Hotline. d. On the Community Cable Access Channel. e. In an e-mail format to known representatives on Lake Susan. f. To the Carver County Sheriff's Department. g. To the public by other appropriate means determined by council. (Ord. No. 73, § 5.06, 7-11-83; Ord. No. 356, § 7, 12-8-03; Ord. No. 418, § 1, 5-8-06; Ord. No. 419, § 1, 5-22-06) NAME ADDRESS COMMENTS Bob Merritt Not Chanhassen resident-asked to consult Academic/Professional. Reviewed many documents and highlights Canadian research for sediment resuspension. Supports only slow no-wake on Lotus Lake and No wake boating at any lake water level due to size of lake. Notes Eutrophic lake condition of Lotus Lake and his opinion is that boat wakes can cause Hyper-eutrophic state. Larry Koch 471 Bighorn Dr. Slow No-Wake only is not sufficient for conversation -Lake should be at 895 feet or less for any boat at any time. Landowners own and control land above high water mark and waves on land over that are trespassing-people responsible for trespass are liable to land owner. Lake level should be set at 894.3 to prevent waves going over. Wave action is responsible for increase in phosphorus is water column. Lotus Lake is too small for wake boating-you wouldn't land a 747 at Flying Cloud Airport. JoAnn Syverson 489 Pleasentview Rd. Survey results show majority in favor of Slow No-Wake Ordinance not just people living on the lake. Describes times when area lakes post No Wake and boaters go to Lotus causing damage and lake property owners are the ones who experience the damage. wants level lowered additional 6 inches. effects of wake boats will be evident in coming year. Wants city council work session to continue discussion. Steve Donen 7341 Frontier Trail Believes Lake should be used by all but is in favor of restrictions. Talked about previous task force that looked at lake levels-wants to keep within reason and offers some peoples suggestions would make the lake unuseable 30 +% of the boating season and some would have no waves ever. States the Lotus is not a clear lake but previously lake levels went high but didn't stay high for long and lake not clear for other reasons not eroding shorelines--look at inflow etc. Nick Vassallo 6669 Horseshoe Curve Has lived on Lake for 20 years and observed changes over the last 5 years. Wants full recreational use of lake but clear evidence of erosion on North side of lake. Has lost 4 feet of his yard and trees have fallen into lake. Doesn't want to restrict lake use but something needs to change-he wants a common sense approach. voiced concern that 4th of July other lakes were restricted but not Lotus and boater came to Lotus and causes a lot of damage. Joe Shneider 21125 Christmas Lane, Shorewood Used to live in Chanhassen -now on Christmas Lake in Shorewood. Former lake president. Paul Huttner Lake Conference talked about Climate change impact on lakes. More severe weather events-lakes will be higher and restrictions will last longer. Lakes will not be able to maintain past practices because of climate change so things can't stay the same. Peggy Nass 7200 Willow View Cove Lake Minnetonka a bigger lake has restrictions 300 feet from shoreline won't work on narrow Lotus Lake. Bigger rain storms and less outflow-not enough storm water holding ponds causing lakes to be higher-also boats are getting larger and w/ different designs. Believes something needs to be done and in the common sense approach to preserve lake for future children/grandchilder. Steve Gunther 3628 Hickory Rd Lake Minnewashta resident. Recreational lake users and are in support of approved ordinance-in favor of clearly defined rules and levels for slow no-wake. Has taken erosion control measures on his property and still seen damage-believe wake boats are problem- encourages wake boats to operate far from shore. is in support of new level but reserve right to change later if needed. Laurie Susla 7008 Dakota Ave Lotus Lake homeowner. Supports reduction in level 6" below proposed-Supports having ordinance. John Colford 7470 Chanhassen Rd Out of all homes on Lotus Lake only 25 have not protected shoreline w/ RippRap. No such thing as maintenance free lakeshore and owning home on a lake it comes with the territory. He has protected shoreline above the standard. Does Not want to restrict use of the lake. Believes there is more at play than wake boats sites failing retaining wall as soil conditions. Mark Von Oven 6655 Horseshoe Curve Lotus Lake homeowner, recreational user, Lotus Lake board member. Lifelong dream to be lake owner & wants to protect dream. As board member says data can be interpreted in many ways and can make it say what you want it to say. Agrees that decision was made with data available and supports decision to set level. believes overall problem is not just wake boats and shoreline protection is important. also states against other claims of trees falling into lake that it has been a unusually wet year and trees have gone down away from shoreline as well. Nathan Springer 7021 Pimlico Ln Not a lake shore owner-works for DNR. Currently experiencing historically high levels. Besides setting limits on lake should be planning zoning around lake to be cautious- Increased impervious will cause issues with lake as water has to go somewhere. Land use is a factor. Donna Burt 6645 Horseshoe Curve 896.8 is too high-storm drain in her yard is under water. OHW level is covering dock, damages property and erodes shore-protection washes into lake at OHW. Damage would be avoided if set 6" lower at 895.8 and there is no safe level for use of wake boats. this is based on science not just opinion- poor water clarity. There is plenty of recreational uses on lake without creating wake. Andrew Armstrong 220 Frontier Ct New lake shore owner. Invested in Chanhassen. States has had debris wash 10 feet up on to property. Previous owner had not put in shoreline protection. Lowering seems to be acceptable as well as responsible use of motor boats to preserve for next generation. Steve Corkery 40 Twin Maple Ln States we all care about the lake but has been like pea soup for years-this is a record high year-previous years lake levels were low due to dry years. We should not over-react - should be incremental not knee-jerk reaction. We should put more emphasis on storm water runoff rather than looking at high water period and should re-assess as we go. Public Open House October 16, 2019 Draft/amend ordinance and generate supporting documents Nov/Dec 2019 Public Hearing at City Council January 13, 2020 Revise ordinance based on public input January 2020 Submit to DNR for review and approval 120 day review City Council approves ordinance after DNR approval May 2020 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Resolution 2020­XX: Award of Bids for Lyman Boulevard Improvement Project Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: H.1. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2012­02 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a resolution awarding the low bid received for the Lyman Boulevard Improvement Project (TH 41 to Galpin Boulevard) to Eureka Construction, Inc.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND Carver County was planning to reconstruct the intersection of Highway 41 and Lyman Boulevard (County Highway 18), and Lyman Boulevard from just west of Highway 41 to Galpin Boulevard. The project was planned to begin construction in the spring of 2019. The City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with Carver County on February 19, 2019 for the completion of these improvements. This project has been planned for several years.  The project was originally bid on May 2, 2019 and the bids came in over $1.2 million dollars over the engineer's estimate. It was decided to reject the bids and rebid the project in January 2020 when better bidding conditions were expected. DISCUSSION Carver County adjusted the project phasing and some other minor adjustments to the project design and subsequently re­advertised for bids to complete the Lyman Boulevard improvements.  The county received four bids on December 10, 2019.   The bid results are as follows: The low bidder, Eureka Construction, is $227,013.20 over the Engineer's Estimate.  The impact of the cost participation for Chanhassen is less than was forecasted in the JPA.  The JPA estimates the cost of Chanhassen's participation at $2,228,921.16.  Based on the bid results and the areas of the project specific to Chanhassen, the city's participation is currently estimated to be $2,191,108.05. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, January 13, 2020SubjectResolution 2020­XX: Award of Bids for Lyman Boulevard Improvement ProjectSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Project No. 2012­02PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a resolution awarding the low bid received for the Lyman Boulevard ImprovementProject (TH 41 to Galpin Boulevard) to Eureka Construction, Inc.”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDCarver County was planning to reconstruct the intersection of Highway 41 and Lyman Boulevard (County Highway18), and Lyman Boulevard from just west of Highway 41 to Galpin Boulevard. The project was planned to beginconstruction in the spring of 2019. The City Council approved a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with Carver Countyon February 19, 2019 for the completion of these improvements. This project has been planned for several years. The project was originally bid on May 2, 2019 and the bids came in over $1.2 million dollars over the engineer'sestimate. It was decided to reject the bids and rebid the project in January 2020 when better bidding conditions wereexpected.DISCUSSIONCarver County adjusted the project phasing and some other minor adjustments to the project design and subsequentlyre­advertised for bids to complete the Lyman Boulevard improvements.  The county received four bids on December10, 2019.  The bid results are as follows:The low bidder, Eureka Construction, is $227,013.20 over the Engineer's Estimate.  The impact of the costparticipation for Chanhassen is less than was forecasted in the JPA.  The JPA estimates the cost of Chanhassen's participation at $2,228,921.16.  Based on the bid results and the areas of the project specific to Chanhassen, the city's participation is currently estimated to be $2,191,108.05. Eureka Construction is a contractor qualified to perform this project.  They have the staffing and equipment capable of performing a project of this size and complexity. The concensus between staff from Carver County and Chanhassen to approve the project at a lower cost would not be expected if the project was delayed.  The other project partner city, Chaska, has yet to indicate their thoughts regarding approval of the project.  Carver County is the lead agency heading the project but they were unable to indicate why Chaska has not yet made a determination.  MnDOT has also issued a letter indicating concurrence with approving award of the construction contract. The county did receive Local Partnership Project Funds (LPP) and Transportation Economic Development Funds (TED) through MnDOT to help finance this project. In the attached 2020 CIP Sheet, the payment in 2020 is expected to decrease to an amount of $111,108.05. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Carver County Bid Summary MnDOT Concurrence Letter Low Bid Cost Splits 2020 CIP Sheet CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: January 13, 2020 RESOLUTION NO: 2020-02 MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING BIDS FOR THE LYMAN BOULEVARD (CSAH18) RECONSTRUCTION FROM TH41 TO GALPIN BOULEVARD - PROJECT NO. 12-02 WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Chaska and Carver County on February 19, 2019 for the reconstruction of Lyman Boulevard from TH41 to Galpin Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreement stipulates that the award of the construction contract is subject to the approval by the city; and WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Project No. 12-02 (Lyman Boulevard Reconstruction from TH41 to Galpin), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder Total Bid Amount Eureka Construction, Inc. $7,752,902.16 Meyer Contracting Inc. $8,179,713.13 Mathiowetz Construction $8,337,513.81 S.M. Hentges and Son, Inc. $8,607,006.80 WHEREAS, the lowest responsible bidder is $227,013.20 over the engineer’s estimate (3%). NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The mayor and city council recommend to the Carver County board that they approve the award of the low bid to Eureka Construction, Inc., in the amount of $7,752,902.16. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 13th day of January, 2020. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Elise Ryan, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 12/10/2019 Project Bid Abstract Summary for Project SAP 010-618-014 carverweb3/RtAEC/Reports/rpt_AbstractSummary.asp?WorkOrderID=199&EngineerEst=Y 1/1 12/10/2019 CCHD Project Bid Summary Project Name: CSAH 18 Reconstruction from TH 41 to GaplinContract No.: Client: CARVER COUNTY Project No.: SAP 010-618-014 Bid Opening: 12/10/2019 2:00 PM Owner: CARVER COUNTY Vendor Number Business Name Total Bid Amount Percent Over/Under Estimate Engineers Estimate $7,525,889.15 N/A Eureka Construction, Inc.$7,752,902.35 3.02% OVER ESTIMATE N/A Meyer Contracting Inc.$8,179,713.13 8.69% OVER ESTIMATE N/A Mathiowetz Construction Company $8,337,513.81 10.78% OVER ESTIMATE N/A S.M. Hentges & Son, Inc.$8,607,006.80 14.37% OVER ESTIMATE Office of State Aid – Metro District 1500 West County Rd B2 Roseville, MN 55113-3174 phillip.bergem@state.mn.us 651-234-7776 December 12, 2019 Scott Smith Design Engineer Carver County Public Works Department 11360 Highway 212, Suite 1 Cologne, MN 55322 RE: State Concurrence of Low Bid for SP 1008-94 (TH 41=012) SAP 010-618-014, 196-020-011, 194-020-013 Agreement Number 1031267 Carver County Dear Mr. Smith I have received a copy of the low bid and Abstract of Bids for the above referenced project. The letting (bid opening) date was December 10, 2019. The tabulation shows that the apparent low bidder is Eureka Construction, Inc. at $7,752,902.356 which is 3.0% over the engineer’s estimate of $7,525,889.15 for the total project. I have verified that Eureka Construction, Inc. has fewer than 40 employees and therefore does not need to have a certificate of compliance on file with the Minnesota Department of Human Rights today. I have reviewed the low bid price and the variance is acceptable. Carver County is hereby authorized to award this project since Cooperative Construction Agreement 1031267 has been fully executed by the County and MnDOT. When a pre-construction conference is arranged for this project please include Mike Pretel (michael.pretel@state.mn.us, 651-234-7778), Chris Dochniak (christopher.dochniak@state.mn.us, 651-779- 5130) and John Korth (john.korth@state,mn.us, 651-234-7984) on the notification list. I have included the web address of the Project Contact Information Form. The form needs to be filled out and returned one week before construction begins or at the pre-construction conference. The web address is http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/stateaid/ftp/thcontact.docx If you have any questions or additional comments please let me know. Sincerely, Phillip Bergem Local Partnership Engineer Metro State Aid Scott Smith December 12, 2019 Page 2 ecopy: Diane Langenbach, MnDOT-Metro Program Delivery Malakai Ruranika, MnDOT-Municipal Agreements * Julie Dresel, MnDOT-Metro State Aid Rob Wielinski, MnDOT-Metro State Aid Almin Ramic, MnDOT-Metro Traffic Engineering Mike Gerbensky, MnDOT-Metro Traffic Engineering Chris Bosak, MnDOT-Metro Traffic Engineering Mike Fairbanks, MnDOT-Metro Traffic Engineering Curt Krohn, MnDOT-Metro Traffic Engineering John Korth, Waters Edge Office, RTMC Building Geoff Prelgo, Waters Edge Office, RTMC Building Shelly Pedersen, MnDOT-Metro Materials Mike Pretel, MnDOT-Metro State Aid Construction Kirsten Klein, MnDOT-Public Affairs Matt Clark, City of Chaska Bruce Loney, City of Chanhassen Brandon Maas, SRF Project File * Separate email to be sent with attachments for records Project 128637 CSAH 18 From 0.25 W of TH 41 to Galpin BlvdDecember 11, 2019LOW BID PROJECT COST PARTICIAPTIONModified Master Agreement: Cap Escalation/Reduction, County pays for 50% Lyman East R/W (land only), City Share by parcel in each City. (Land Only).  County pays 100% of Parking Lot Mitigation.  County Pays 100% of Lyman West.Rationale: reduce cost burden to cities while keeping to spirit of past agreements. R/W handled similar to recent CIP projects (50% County‐50% City).Remaining Cap = 2,763,290.00$      CSAH 18 East of TH 41 CSAH 18 West of TH 41 TH 41Project Cost SplitsRoadway Split Up to CapRoadway Split After CapR/W Mitigation (Parking Lot/Wall) R/W Land Splits Roadway SplitsR/W Mitigation (Parking Lot/Wall)R/W Land Splits Roadway SplitsR/W Mitigation (Parking Lot/Wall) R/W Land SplitsChanhassen40.29% 45.00% 0.00% 2.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Chaska19.42% 10.00% 0.00% 47.80% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Carver County40.29% 45.00% 100.00% 50.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%Engineering20.00%of Construction CostLow BidROADWAY R/W*  Mitigation(Parking lot, retaining wall) R/W Land* UTILITIES Engineering(20% of construction) TotalsTH 41 1,544,323.35$           378,118.06$           689,961.69$           384,488.28$       2,996,891.38$     Lyman (CSAH 18) ‐ WEST OF TH 41 764,707.10$              152,941.42$       917,648.52$        Lyman (CSAH 18) ‐ EAST OF TH 41 4,323,849.05$           453,428.52$           563,742.45$           955,455.51$       6,296,475.53$     Fiber (Carver County)64,370.00$         12,874.00$         77,244.00$           Watermain (Chaska)379,022.65$       75,804.53$         454,827.18$        Totals 6,632,879.50$           831,546.58$           1,253,704.14$        443,392.65$       1,581,563.75$    10,743,086.62$   Note:  * Lyman West R/W costs included in TH 41 costsSummary of Cost SharesRoadway R/W*  Mitigation(Parking lot, retaining wall) R/W Land* Utilities Engineering(20% of construction) TotalTotal Project SplitsLyman ‐  Road Construction OnlyConstruction SplitsLyman ‐  R/W (Land)R/W SplitsLyman ‐  Parking Lot MitigationPK Lot SplitsCarver County TH 41 1,544,323.35$           378,118.06$           689,961.69$           384,488.28$      2,996,891.38$     27.9%Carver County Lyman West 764,707.10$              ‐$                         ‐$                         152,941.42$      917,648.52$        8.5% 764,707.10$        100%‐$                    100%‐$                    100%Carver County Lyman East 1,815,581.11$           453,428.52$           281,871.23$           453,801.93$      3,004,682.79$     28.0% 1,815,581.11$    42%281,871.23$      50.00%453,428.52$      100%Carver County Utilities64,370.00$         12,874.00$        77,244.00$          0.7%Chaska TH 41 ‐$                             ‐$                         ‐$                         ‐$                    ‐$                      0.0%Chaska Lyman West ‐$                             ‐$                         ‐$                         ‐$                    ‐$                      0.0% ‐$                      0%‐$                    0%‐$                    0%Chaska Lyman East 692,686.82$              ‐$                         269,460.51$           138,537.36$      1,100,684.70$     10.2% 692,686.82$        16%269,460.51$      48%‐$                    0%Chaska Utilities379,022.65$       75,804.53$        454,827.18$        4.2%Chanhassen TH 41 ‐$                             ‐$                         ‐$                         ‐$                    ‐$                      0.0%Chanhassen Lyman West ‐$                             ‐$                         ‐$                         ‐$                    ‐$                      0.0% ‐$                      0%‐$                    0%‐$                    0%Chanhassen Lyman East 1,815,581.11$           ‐$                         12,410.71$              363,116.22$      2,191,108.05$     20.4% 1,815,581.11$    42%12,410.71$        2%‐$                    0%Totals 6,632,879.50$           831,546.58$           1,253,704.14$        443,392.65$       1,581,563.75$    10,743,086.62$    100% 5,088,556.15$     563,742.45$       453,428.52$       CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject 2019 Building Permit Activity Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.1. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No:  ATTACHMENTS: 2019 Building Permit Activity g:\admin\forms\building permit activity 2019 ytd.doc City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1100 Residential Building Permits 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter YTD 4th Quarter Total YTD Residential Single-Family 4 15 11 10 40 Residential Townhomes 0 12 6 0 18 Apartments/Senior Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 Total Residential 4 27 17 10 58 Commercial Building Permits 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter YTD 4th Quarter Total YTD New 0 0 3 0 3 Redeveloped 0 0 0 1 1 Remodeled 13 14 20 6 53 Total Commercial 13 14 23 7 57 Available Lot Inventory (end of Quarter) 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter YTD 4th Quarter Single-Family Lots 99 81 75 120 Residential Townhome Lots 42 42 30 24 Total Available Lots 141 123 105 144 Total Permit History 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Single-Family 100 48 55 49 40 Townhomes 4 0 12 56 18 Apartments/Senior Facilities 0 76 0 268 0 Commercial 109 109 67 58 57 Total Number of All Permits 213 233 134 431 115 2019 Building Permit Activity I3{* ; : 3 l a ! II II I I dP6i!62tB 2" a ||l 2 l = l'llgl I l; il I lEl'l++l.t+ftTT :!I a,ai a::;.""i"".I CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, January 13, 2020 Subject Review of Claims Paid 01­13­2020 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.2. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on January 13, 2020: Check Numbers Amounts 172218 – 172385 $1,103,734.53 ACH Payments $679,337.27 Total All Claims $1,783,071.80 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 1/4/2020 1:13 PM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount AMESCON AMES CONSTRUCTION 12/05/2019 0.00 500.00172218 BCATRA BCA 12/05/2019 0.00 90.00172219 BroGar Brookside Garden Center, Inc.12/05/2019 0.00 118.11172220 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 0.00 1,818.88172221 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 12/05/2019 0.00 76.46172222 FirSaf Fire Safety USA 12/05/2019 0.00 428.00172223 GESKGREG GREGG GESKE 12/05/2019 0.00 204.91172224 HARTLIFE Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company12/05/2019 0.00 1,023.84172225 HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 12/05/2019 0.00 9.00172226 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/05/2019 0.00 1,366.67172227 ICC INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 12/05/2019 0.00 1,760.00172228 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 12/05/2019 0.00 700.00172229 LANKAB LANCE KABANUK 12/05/2019 0.00 223.06172230 KENFAR KENDALLVILLE FARMS 12/05/2019 0.00 800.00172231 KUSCON KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 12/05/2019 0.00 19,685.00172232 MNTRAN MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 12/05/2019 0.00 207.38172233 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/05/2019 0.00 80.00172234 NOVSOL NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 12/05/2019 0.00 9,206.60172235 PitBow Pitney Bowes Inc.12/05/2019 0.00 813.92172236 POST POSTMASTER 12/05/2019 0.00 100.00172237 POST POSTMASTER 12/05/2019 0.00 100.00172238 SABHEA SABRE HEATING & AIR COND.12/05/2019 0.00 761.32172239 ELISCH ELIZABETH SCHWOCHOW 12/05/2019 0.00 36.00172240 SCOTRE SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 12/05/2019 0.00 1,800.00172241 OSSCON The Osseo Construction Company LLC 12/05/2019 0.00 289,447.19172242 UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 12/05/2019 0.00 135.00172243 WATTIT WATERMARK TITLE 12/05/2019 0.00 7.68172244 SRWEID SR WEIDEMA INC 12/05/2019 0.00 3,500.00172245 BCATRA BCA 12/12/2019 0.00 30.00172246 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 0.00 3,369.68172247 CenLin CenturyLink 12/12/2019 0.00 64.00172248 CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 12/12/2019 0.00 624.03172249 ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 12/12/2019 0.00 6,343.84172250 CROCOL CROWN COLLEGE 12/12/2019 0.00 750.00172251 CulBot Culligan Bottled Water 12/12/2019 0.00 223.53172252 DAKSUP DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 12/12/2019 0.00 151.58172253 DELTOO DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 12/12/2019 0.00 704.60172254 UB*01855 JOHN & KATHLEEN DEMBINSKI 12/12/2019 0.00 17.03172255 DowdTroo Troon Dowds 12/12/2019 0.00 8.60172256 DUCHDOUG Douglas & Rebecca Duchon 12/12/2019 0.00 30.00172257 EARAND Earl F Andersen Inc 12/12/2019 0.00 368.20172258 epapp Eden Prairie Appliance LLC 12/12/2019 0.00 69.82172259 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/12/2019 0.00 317.84172260 FIRHEA FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 12/12/2019 0.00 15.90172261 GREMEA GREEN MEADOWS INC 12/12/2019 0.00 1,210.00172262 JAGCOM Jaguar Communications Inc 12/12/2019 0.00 53.60172263 JoneDavi David Jones 12/12/2019 0.00 100.00172264 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/4/2020 1:13 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount UB*01856 KYLE & KATHLEEN KARUS 12/12/2019 0.00 29.26172265 KOEHJASO Jason Koehnen 12/12/2019 0.00 179.96172266 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 12/12/2019 0.00 147.77172267 JHLARC J.H. LARSON COMPANY 12/12/2019 0.00 110.20172268 MCMCAR MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 12/12/2019 0.00 58.84172269 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 12/12/2019 VOID 4,920.30 0.00172270 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 12/12/2019 0.00 172,654.49172271 MILWIN Milbank Winwater Works 12/12/2019 0.00 652.88172272 MNFALLE MN FALLS EXPO 12/12/2019 0.00 270.00172273 NORASP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 12/12/2019 0.00 25,849.33172274 QUAFIR Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 12/12/2019 0.00 500.00172275 ROERBRIA BRIAN ROERICK 12/12/2019 0.00 350.70172276 UB*01854 BEVERLY & RONALD SCHROER 12/12/2019 0.00 5.21172277 SHOTRU SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 12/12/2019 0.00 82.96172278 SIRLIN SIR LINES-A-LOT 12/12/2019 0.00 3,835.20172279 ShaMde SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 12/12/2019 0.00 2,276.30172280 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 12/12/2019 0.00 942.64172281 UB*01853 TONYA BATES 12/12/2019 0.00 10.86172282 VIKELE VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 12/12/2019 0.00 66.04172283 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 0.00 1,330.68172284 mnucfu Minnesota UC Fund 12/12/2019 0.00 6,812.34172285 ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 12/19/2019 0.00 490.84172286 ANDEJOAN Joan Anderson 12/19/2019 0.00 75.00172287 BCATRA BCA 12/19/2019 0.00 30.00172288 BLAZMARY Mary Blazanin 12/19/2019 0.00 123.91172289 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 12/19/2019 0.00 137.42172290 UB*01863 BURNET TITLE 12/19/2019 0.00 41.98172291 CABFEV CABIN FEVER SPORTING GOODS 12/19/2019 0.00 1,920.85172292 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/19/2019 0.00 2,308.36172293 chanwe Chanhassen West 79th St LLC 12/19/2019 0.00 3,535.00172294 UB*01862 EDINA REALTY 12/19/2019 0.00 175.55172295 EGACOM EGAN COMPANY 12/19/2019 0.00 3,488.00172296 EHLERS EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 0.00 3,302.50172297 EPIEVE EPIC EVENT RENTAL 12/19/2019 0.00 260.92172298 EXCFIR EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 12/19/2019 0.00 8,812.00172299 UB*01866 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 12/19/2019 0.00 12.34172300 Gascom Gassen Company, AAMC 12/19/2019 0.00 1,425.94172301 GRERIV Great River Greening 12/19/2019 0.00 2,061.20172302 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/19/2019 0.00 1,366.67172303 KENGRA KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 12/19/2019 0.00 12,850.60172304 UB*01865 DORTHY KOCH 12/19/2019 0.00 3.17172305 UB*01860 LANDTITLE 12/19/2019 0.00 10.61172306 LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 12/19/2019 0.00 60,715.00172307 MausKerr Kerry Maus 12/19/2019 0.00 306.00172308 MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 12/19/2019 0.00 34.39172309 MCMCAR MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 12/19/2019 0.00 59.74172310 UB*01859 BRANDON & KRISTIN MEHDIZADEH 12/19/2019 0.00 30.93172311 NORASP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 12/19/2019 0.00 19,985.00172312 RAITRE RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 12/19/2019 0.00 2,766.00172313 Schmigre Greg Schmieg 12/19/2019 0.00 226.94172314 UB*01858 CRAIG & LOIS SCHULSTAD 12/19/2019 0.00 302.30172315 Senja Senja Inc 12/19/2019 0.00 57.60172316 ShawJame James M. Shaw 12/19/2019 0.00 95.00172317 SIEGCHAR CHARLES SIEGLE 12/19/2019 0.00 425.00172318 SOFHOU SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 12/19/2019 0.00 661.50172319 UB*01857 TITLE CHOICE LLC 12/19/2019 0.00 13.28172320 UB*01861 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 12/19/2019 0.00 15.37172321 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/4/2020 1:13 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount UB*01864 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 12/19/2019 0.00 57.49172322 WINGRICH RICHARD WING 12/19/2019 0.00 100.00172323 AE2SCON AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 12/26/2019 0.00 1,312.25172324 BCATRA BCA 12/26/2019 0.00 15.00172325 BENPRO BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 12/26/2019 0.00 295.00172326 CenLin CenturyLink 12/26/2019 0.00 59.63172327 ComMin Compass Minerals America, Inc 12/26/2019 0.00 3,946.51172328 DEMCON DEM-CON LANDFILL 12/26/2019 0.00 77.53172329 DORTEC DOOR TECH SYSTEMS 12/26/2019 0.00 377.20172330 EDETRA EDEN TRACE CORPORATION 12/26/2019 0.00 60,000.00172331 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/26/2019 0.00 102.19172332 FIRSYS First Systems Technology, Inc.12/26/2019 0.00 300.00172333 GFOA GFOA 12/26/2019 0.00 225.00172334 GLOSPE GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS INC12/26/2019 0.00 4,439.46172335 K TECH K-TECH SPECIALTY COATINGS, INC 12/26/2019 0.00 722.55172336 K2Ele K2 Electrical Services Inc 12/26/2019 0.00 925.00172337 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 12/26/2019 0.00 232.50172338 MCKMED McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 12/26/2019 0.00 27.39172339 MinuPre Minuteman Press 12/26/2019 0.00 16.00172340 UB*01868 PAMELA MURRAY 12/26/2019 0.00 90.21172341 NORASP NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 12/26/2019 0.00 229,913.39172342 OLSCAB OLSON CABINETS & WOODWORKING 12/26/2019 0.00 284.00172343 UB*01867 RICHARD & KATHERINE 12/26/2019 0.00 64.95172344 ROSCAR ROSELYN CARPET CLEANERS LLC 12/26/2019 0.00 90.00172345 STAMIN STATE OF MINNESOTA 12/26/2019 0.00 80.00172346 TessEric Eric Tessman 12/26/2019 0.00 31.35172347 THECON THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 12/26/2019 0.00 7,734.74172348 POST POSTMASTER 12/31/2019 0.00 629.75172349 AANEKATE KATE AANENSON 01/02/2020 0.00 81.03172350 ASPEQU Aspen Equipment 01/02/2020 0.00 83.51172351 ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 01/02/2020 0.00 142.35172352 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/02/2020 0.00 519.68172353 BurkChar Charlie Burke 01/02/2020 0.00 340.02172354 CARTRE CARVER COUNTY TREASURER 01/02/2020 0.00 11,309.93172355 CDWGOV CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 01/02/2020 0.00 878.74172356 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 0.00 1,824.49172357 comcoo Complete Cooling Systems 01/02/2020 0.00 461.50172358 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 01/02/2020 0.00 3,355.53172359 CUTABO CUT ABOVE INC 01/02/2020 0.00 4,700.00172360 DELTOO DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/02/2020 0.00 456.75172361 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 01/02/2020 0.00 203.73172362 FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/02/2020 0.00 1,317.88172363 ferwat Ferguson Waterworks #2518 01/02/2020 0.00 23,470.81172364 FirSaf Fire Safety USA 01/02/2020 0.00 110.00172365 GolLak Golf Lakes Condos 01/02/2020 0.00 32,277.97172366 HEINROBE ROBERT HEINEN 01/02/2020 0.00 104.96172367 HOOPTHRE Hoops & Threads LLC 01/02/2020 0.00 27.00172368 JohnDon Don Johnson 01/02/2020 0.00 12.87172369 KODCUS KODIAK CUSTOM LETTERING 01/02/2020 0.00 504.00172370 LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/02/2020 0.00 1,935.77172371 MADGAL MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 01/02/2020 0.00 1,093.34172372 MINFIR CERTIFICATION BOARD MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICE01/02/2020 0.00 240.00172373 VALRIC VALLEY-RICH CO INC 01/02/2020 0.00 4,197.00172374 VeoEnv Veolia Environmental Services 01/02/2020 0.00 189.25172375 VIKELE VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/02/2020 0.00 42.34172376 wegmic Michael Wegner 01/02/2020 0.00 425.00172377 HARTLIFE Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company01/02/2020 0.00 1,099.74172378 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/4/2020 1:13 PM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/02/2020 0.00 1,408.41172379 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 01/02/2020 0.00 665.00172380 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/02/2020 0.00 80.00172381 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 01/02/2020 0.00 23.00172382 MRWA MN Rural Water Association 01/02/2020 0.00 300.00172383 SanCre Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 0.00 3,500.00172384 SESAC SESAC 01/02/2020 0.00 460.00172385 Report Total (168 checks): 1,103,734.53 4,920.30 Page 4AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/4/2020 1:13 PM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 1/4/2020 1:14 PM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-AMAZON Amazon 11/18/2019 0.00 1,637.32 ACH Z-AMELEG American Legion 11/18/2019 0.00 12.18 ACH Z-AMEPLA American Planning Association 11/18/2019 0.00 625.00 ACH Z-APPLE Apple.com 11/18/2019 0.00 3.98 ACH Z-ARNIES ARNIE'S 11/18/2019 0.00 57.00 ACH Z-ARRRES Arrowwood Resort 11/18/2019 0.00 706.13 ACH Z-AXELS Axels 11/18/2019 0.00 80.00 ACH Z-BESBUY Best Buy 11/18/2019 0.00 285.79 ACH Z-BP BP 11/18/2019 0.00 41.51 ACH Z-BREPOI Breezy Point Resort 11/18/2019 0.00 127.78 ACH Z-CAFTHY Cafe Thyme 11/18/2019 0.00 148.22 ACH Z-CARCOF Caribou Coffee 11/18/2019 0.00 7.49 ACH Z-CHANDI Chanhassen Dinner Theatre 11/18/2019 0.00 360.00 ACH Z-CHAFLO Chanhassen Floral 11/18/2019 0.00 48.95 ACH z-chosta Chocolaterie Stam 11/18/2019 0.00 114.08 ACH Z-COMSUI COMFORT SUITES CANAL PARK 11/18/2019 0.00 2,691.14 ACH Z-COSTCO Costco Wholesale 11/18/2019 0.00 558.05 ACH Z-COUINN Country Inn & Suites 11/18/2019 0.00 2,352.00 ACH Z-CUBFOO Cub Foods 11/18/2019 0.00 250.48 ACH Z-DELTA Delta Airlines 11/18/2019 0.00 554.20 ACH Z-EBAY Ebay 11/18/2019 0.00 10.99 ACH Z-ELEPAR Electropart 11/18/2019 0.00 115.96 ACH Z-ENAELE Enabling Elements Inc 11/18/2019 0.00 15.00 ACH Z-EVEBRI Eventbrite 11/18/2019 0.00 175.00 ACH Z-EXIRES EXIT 45 RESTAURANT & BAKERY 11/18/2019 0.00 35.54 ACH Z-FACBOO Facebook 11/18/2019 0.00 65.70 ACH Z-FIRSMA Fire Smart Promotions 11/18/2019 0.00 483.00 ACH z-firstu First Student Charter Center 11/18/2019 0.00 630.00 ACH z-flefar Fleet Farm 11/18/2019 0.00 200.21 ACH Z-GLOEQU GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 11/18/2019 0.00 196.25 ACH Z-GOOWIL Goodwill 11/18/2019 0.00 434.63 ACH z-grain Grainger 11/18/2019 0.00 178.52 ACH z-hoblob Hobby Lobby 11/18/2019 0.00 13.98 ACH Z-HOMDEP Home Depot 11/18/2019 0.00 1,721.65 ACH Z-ISCSAL ISC Sales, INC 11/18/2019 0.00 134.25 ACH Z-KNOWBE KNOWBE4 INC 11/18/2019 0.00 911.87 ACH Z-KWITRI Kwik Trip 11/18/2019 0.00 7.98 ACH Z-LUNBYE Lunds & Byerly's 11/18/2019 0.00 66.10 ACH Z-MENARD Menards 11/18/2019 0.00 1,257.24 ACH Z-MICHAE Michaels 11/18/2019 0.00 43.83 ACH Z-MNRUR Minnesota Rural Water Association 11/18/2019 0.00 125.00 ACH Z-MNAWWA MN American Water Works Association 11/18/2019 0.00 75.00 ACH Z-MAGC MN Association of Government Communicators 11/18/2019 0.00 -160.00 ACH z-neogov NEOGOV 11/18/2019 0.00 244.00 ACH z-nexaut Next Day Automation 11/18/2019 0.00 197.95 Page 1 of 6 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-NORCOO NORTH COOP 11/18/2019 0.00 85.00 ACH Z-NORTOO Northern Tool+Equipment 11/18/2019 0.00 226.73 ACH Z-OFFMAX Office Max/Office Depot 11/18/2019 0.00 197.66 ACH Z-PARCIT Party City 11/18/2019 0.00 511.15 ACH z-pizran Pizza Ranch 11/18/2019 0.00 302.78 ACH Z-PIZZAI Pizzaioli 11/18/2019 0.00 375.13 ACH Z-POTBEL Potbelly Sandwich Shop 11/18/2019 0.00 137.30 ACH z-protre Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 11/18/2019 0.00 1,950.00 ACH Z-RCTWEE RCT WEEDLEY 11/18/2019 0.00 29.99 ACH Z-ROTCLU Rotary Club 11/18/2019 0.00 53.00 ACH Z-SAMCLU Sam's Club 11/18/2019 0.00 110.55 ACH Z-SavJum Savage Jump Inflatables 11/18/2019 0.00 170.46 ACH Z-SENLAN Sensible Land Use Coalition 11/18/2019 0.00 48.00 ACH z-setide Seton Indentification Products 11/18/2019 0.00 18.25 ACH Z-SHAFIL ShareFile 11/18/2019 0.00 565.33 ACH Z-SOFHOU Software House International 11/18/2019 0.00 118.70 ACH z-sounew Southwest Newspapers 11/18/2019 0.00 40.00 ACH z-speway Speedway 11/18/2019 0.00 16.22 ACH z-stocit Story City GCC 11/18/2019 0.00 85.00 ACH Z-TARGET Target 11/18/2019 0.00 58.28 ACH Z-TESSCO Tessco 11/18/2019 0.00 481.51 ACH Z-THEFIR THE FIRE STORE.COM 11/18/2019 0.00 47.98 ACH Z-TRAJOE TRADER JOE'S 11/18/2019 0.00 51.52 ACH Z-UNOFMN University of Minnesota 11/18/2019 0.00 510.00 ACH Z-VIKELE Viking Electric Supply 11/18/2019 0.00 63.68 ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 12/05/2019 0.00 140.00 ACH AMESOL AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 12/05/2019 0.00 1,114.75 ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 12/05/2019 0.00 2,191.40 ACH carcou Carver County 12/05/2019 0.00 146,527.60 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 0.00 4,713.45 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 12/05/2019 0.00 4.54 ACH FergEnte Ferguson Waterworks #2516 12/05/2019 0.00 2,457.60 ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 12/05/2019 0.00 346.95 ACH HenPro Henning Professional Services, Inc 12/05/2019 0.00 3,479.18 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/05/2019 0.00 175.72 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergengy Group 12/05/2019 0.00 7,900.66 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/05/2019 0.00 560.06 ACH PotMN Potentia MN Solar 12/05/2019 0.00 6,612.30 ACH SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 12/05/2019 0.00 179.96 ACH MINCON SUMMIT COMPANIES 12/05/2019 0.00 600.00 ACH TCIInc TCIC, Inc. 12/05/2019 0.00 93.00 ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 12/05/2019 0.00 129.99 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 12/05/2019 0.00 29.40 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 12/05/2019 0.00 1,567.69 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 0.00 3,678.68 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 0.00 15,446.83 ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 12/12/2019 0.00 401.25 ACH ALLBLA ALLIED BLACKTOP 12/12/2019 0.00 15,398.95 ACH BENEXT BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 12/12/2019 0.00 104.00 ACH CAMKNU CAMPBELL KNUTSON 12/12/2019 0.00 13,537.23 ACH carcou Carver County 12/12/2019 0.00 10,644.74 ACH CheCra Chef Craig's Catering 12/12/2019 0.00 1,883.99 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 12/12/2019 0.00 6,923.40 ACH DALCO DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 12/12/2019 0.00 23.09 Page 2 of 6 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH FORAME FORCE AMERICA INC 12/12/2019 0.00 140.66 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/12/2019 0.00 17.79 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 12/12/2019 0.00 1,284.35 ACH KRESER KREMER SERVICES 12/12/2019 0.00 608.95 ACH Marco Marco Inc 12/12/2019 0.00 970.68 ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 0.00 815.63 ACH MINGER MINGER CONSTRUCTION 12/12/2019 0.00 22,581.80 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 12/12/2019 0.00 2,826.33 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/12/2019 0.00 27,188.43 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 12/12/2019 0.00 40.40 ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 12/12/2019 0.00 49.82 ACH PioEng Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 12/12/2019 0.00 1,545.00 ACH ProTec Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 12/12/2019 0.00 364.17 ACH SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 12/12/2019 0.00 20.05 ACH STAPRO Stavros Properties 12/12/2019 0.00 414.92 ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 12/12/2019 0.00 68.89 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 0.00 1,370.42 ACH TBEI TBEI, Inc 12/12/2019 0.00 153.12 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 12/12/2019 0.00 479.28 ACH WarLit Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 12/12/2019 0.00 352.00 ACH z-AEDSUP AED SUPERSTORE 12/17/2019 0.00 1,302.03 ACH Z-AMAZON Amazon 12/17/2019 0.00 2,479.37 ACH z-amesco Ames Convention & Visitors Bureau 12/17/2019 0.00 320.00 ACH Z-APPLE Apple.com 12/17/2019 0.00 9.34 ACH Z-ARAARB Aramark Arboretum 12/17/2019 0.00 681.71 ACH Z-BATPLU Batteries Plus 12/17/2019 0.00 135.92 ACH Z-BESBUY Best Buy 12/17/2019 0.00 407.45 ACH Z-BLOWAL Blocker & Wallace Service LLC 12/17/2019 0.00 95.37 ACH Z-CAFTHY Cafe Thyme 12/17/2019 0.00 148.22 ACH Z-CARHAR Carhartt 12/17/2019 0.00 424.89 ACH Z-CARCOU Carver County Environmental Center 12/17/2019 0.00 159.00 ACH Z-CHIFIL Chick-Fil-A 12/17/2019 0.00 15.14 ACH Z-CHIMEX Chipotle Mexican Grill 12/17/2019 0.00 34.90 ACH z-clajum Claim Jumper 12/17/2019 0.00 34.00 ACH Z-COMSUI COMFORT SUITES CANAL PARK 12/17/2019 0.00 721.95 ACH z-compro CompressorPros 12/17/2019 0.00 55.98 ACH z-corfee Corporate Card Annual Fee 12/17/2019 0.00 24.00 ACH Z-CUBFOO Cub Foods 12/17/2019 0.00 515.99 ACH Z-DELTA Delta Airlines 12/17/2019 0.00 60.00 ACH Z-DOMINO Domino's Pizza 12/17/2019 0.00 126.38 ACH z-edlbar Edley's Bar-B-Que 12/17/2019 0.00 22.00 ACH Z-ENAELE Enabling Elements Inc 12/17/2019 0.00 15.00 ACH z-eurpro Eureka Property Services 12/17/2019 0.00 7,973.50 ACH Z-EVEBRI Eventbrite 12/17/2019 0.00 250.00 ACH z-exxon Exxon Mobile 12/17/2019 0.00 39.59 ACH z-fasmea Fast Measure Distance 12/17/2019 0.00 543.50 ACH Z-FE1652 Ferguson Enterprises #1652 12/17/2019 0.00 244.23 ACH z-fiejon Fieldhouse Jones Nashville 12/17/2019 0.00 1,031.12 ACH Z-FIRSMA Fire Smart Promotions 12/17/2019 0.00 600.00 ACH Z-FUNEXP Fun Express LLC 12/17/2019 0.00 231.46 ACH z-gloind Global Industrial Solutions 12/17/2019 0.00 1,293.41 ACH z-grain Grainger 12/17/2019 0.00 170.74 ACH z-gsdire GS Direct 12/17/2019 0.00 49.01 ACH Z-HACCOM Hach Company 12/17/2019 0.00 516.37 Page 3 of 6 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-HALCOM Hallock Company 12/17/2019 0.00 115.78 ACH Z-HOLINN Holiday Inn & Suites 12/17/2019 0.00 363.72 ACH Z-HOMDEP Home Depot 12/17/2019 0.00 1,085.20 ACH z-jaunt Jaunt Services, Inc. 12/17/2019 0.00 47.50 ACH z-KLSALE K&L Sales, Inc 12/17/2019 0.00 12.95 ACH Z-KOHLS Kohls 12/17/2019 0.00 253.00 ACH Z-KWITRI Kwik Trip 12/17/2019 0.00 48.32 ACH Z-LEEANN LEEANN CHIN 12/17/2019 0.00 179.31 ACH Z-LOGME LogMeIn Inc 12/17/2019 0.00 375.80 ACH Z-MACKEN Mackenthun's 12/17/2019 0.00 470.51 ACH Z-MCMCAR McMaster-Carr 12/17/2019 0.00 115.12 ACH Z-MENARD Menards 12/17/2019 0.00 307.39 ACH Z-MILNAM Militarynames.com 12/17/2019 0.00 9.50 ACH Z-MNFIRE Minn Fire Svc Cert Board 12/17/2019 0.00 450.00 ACH Z-MNPOLL MN Pollution Control Agency 12/17/2019 0.00 445.00 ACH Z-MNSOC MN Society of Arboriculture 12/17/2019 0.00 130.00 ACH Z-NAVICO Navico 12/17/2019 0.00 825.00 ACH Z-NOVLIG NoveltyLights.com 12/17/2019 0.00 2,576.42 ACH Z-OffMax Office Max/Office Depot 12/17/2019 0.00 50.17 ACH z-oracoa Orange Coast Pneumatics 12/17/2019 0.00 380.16 ACH Z-OTCBRA OTC Brands Inc 12/17/2019 0.00 42.99 ACH Z-PARCIT Party City 12/17/2019 0.00 26.70 ACH z-pcwor PC World Magazine 12/17/2019 0.00 19.97 ACH z-pegleg Peg Leg Porker 12/17/2019 0.00 19.92 ACH z-post Postmaster 12/17/2019 0.00 21.04 ACH Z-REDWIN Red Wing Store 12/17/2019 0.00 139.99 ACH Z-ROTCLU Rotary Club 12/17/2019 0.00 53.00 ACH Z-SAMCLU Sam's Club 12/17/2019 0.00 215.85 ACH z-shewil Sherwin-Williams 12/17/2019 0.00 109.55 ACH Z-SHOTRU Shorewood True Value 12/17/2019 0.00 24.03 ACH Z-TARGET Target 12/17/2019 0.00 608.55 ACH Z-TAVERN Tavern 4&5 12/17/2019 0.00 73.00 ACH z-tentax Tenntaxi Nashville 12/17/2019 0.00 31.20 ACH z-thesou The Southern 12/17/2019 0.00 52.00 ACH Z-UOFM U of M Contlearning 12/17/2019 0.00 690.00 ACH Z-VIBTEC VIBRANT TECHNOLOGIES 12/17/2019 0.00 555.00 ACH z-weatec WeatherTech 12/17/2019 0.00 158.76 ACH Z-WEISSM WEISSMAN 12/17/2019 0.00 4,732.85 ACH Z-WENDYS Wendy's 12/17/2019 0.00 7.53 ACH z-wincit Windy City Noveltie 12/17/2019 0.00 72.60 ACH Z-ZINIO Zinio 12/17/2019 0.00 19.99 ACH ACTMIN ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 12/19/2019 0.00 2,050.00 ACH BOLMEN BOLTON & MENK INC 12/19/2019 0.00 5,500.00 ACH CenBus Centro Print Solutions 12/19/2019 0.00 229.06 ACH Avesis Fidelity Security Life 12/19/2019 0.00 202.75 ACH HeaStr Health Strategies 12/19/2019 0.00 175.00 ACH HOIKOE HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 12/19/2019 0.00 21,002.42 ACH IMPPOR IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 12/19/2019 0.00 849.75 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/19/2019 0.00 128.29 ACH AlHiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 12/19/2019 0.00 525.00 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 0.00 27,925.59 ACH thekno Knox Company 12/19/2019 0.00 1,337.00 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergengy Group 12/19/2019 0.00 229.15 ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 12/19/2019 0.00 4,920.30 Page 4 of 6 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH MINGER MINGER CONSTRUCTION 12/19/2019 0.00 30,522.55 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 12/19/2019 0.00 50.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/19/2019 0.00 260.09 ACH MUNCOD MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 12/19/2019 0.00 350.00 ACH PreWat Premium Waters, Inc 12/19/2019 0.00 12.30 ACH PRTURF PRO TURF 12/19/2019 0.00 1,166.00 ACH RBMSER RBM SERVICES INC 12/19/2019 0.00 7,054.47 ACH SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 12/19/2019 0.00 103.44 ACH SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 12/19/2019 0.00 56.71 ACH STRGUA STRATOGUARD LLC 12/19/2019 0.00 176.00 ACH DAHLTERR TERRY DAHL 12/19/2019 0.00 530.00 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 12/19/2019 0.00 29.40 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 0.00 2,500.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 0.00 5,038.16 ACH AFLAC American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 12/26/2019 0.00 39.78 ACH OLSOANNI Annika Olson 12/26/2019 0.00 300.00 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Ford Trucks 12/26/2019 0.00 502.64 ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 12/26/2019 0.00 1,675.50 ACH Choice Choice, Inc. 12/26/2019 0.00 193.92 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 12/26/2019 0.00 1,175.00 ACH EMEAPP EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 12/26/2019 0.00 825.64 ACH HenPro Henning Professional Services, Inc 12/26/2019 0.00 234.50 ACH HydKle Hydro-Klean LLC 12/26/2019 0.00 32,338.21 ACH INDLAN Indoor Landscapes Inc 12/26/2019 0.00 187.00 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/26/2019 0.00 50.94 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 12/26/2019 0.00 7,486.90 ACH KATFUE KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 12/26/2019 0.00 16,868.41 ACH MatTri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 12/26/2019 0.00 152.46 ACH MobMin Mobile Mini, Inc 12/26/2019 0.00 2,705.88 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 12/26/2019 0.00 671.74 ACH NusEqu Nuss Truck & Equipment 12/26/2019 0.00 87.06 ACH QUAFLO Quality Flow Systems Inc 12/26/2019 0.00 250.00 ACH StanTruc Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 12/26/2019 0.00 932.88 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 12/26/2019 0.00 250.80 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 0.00 57,063.52 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 12/26/2019 0.00 7,798.92 ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 01/02/2020 0.00 131.25 ACH PedrChri Christine Lea Pedretti 01/02/2020 0.00 828.10 ACH CLASAF CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 01/02/2020 0.00 125.00 ACH ColLif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/02/2020 0.00 134.58 ACH COMINT COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 01/02/2020 0.00 15,780.69 ACH DelDen Delta Dental 01/02/2020 0.00 2,550.10 ACH EmeRes Emergency Response Solutions 01/02/2020 0.00 715.08 ACH GSDIR GS DIRECT INC 01/02/2020 0.00 5,390.00 ACH MacEme Macqueen Emergengy Group 01/02/2020 0.00 135.03 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/02/2020 0.00 352.82 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/02/2020 0.00 9.73 ACH OPG-3 OPG-3, Inc 01/02/2020 0.00 4,364.98 ACH PIORIM PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 01/02/2020 0.00 163.51 ACH SUBCHE SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/02/2020 0.00 177.30 ACH SunLif Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 0.00 1,444.72 ACH TouPoi TouchPoint Logic LLC 01/02/2020 0.00 4,185.00 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 01/02/2020 0.00 30.40 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 01/02/2020 0.00 40.01 Page 5 of 6 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 01/02/2020 0.00 392.00 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 0.00 28,565.58 ACH ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 01/02/2020 0.00 205.05 Report Total:0.00 679,337.27 Page 6 of 6 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM Name Check Da Account Description Amount AANENSON KATE 01/02/2020 101-1420-4370 Travel and Training 81.03 AANENSON KATE 81.03 AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 12/26/2019 701-0000-4300 P05126-2019-001 2019 SCADA Services 1,312.25 AE2S CONSTRUCTION LLC 1,312.25 ALLSTREAM 12/19/2019 101-1160-4300 Mitel Phone System Maintenance 490.84 ALLSTREAM 490.84 AMES CONSTRUCTION 12/05/2019 815-8221-2024 SECURITY ESCROW REFUND 500.00 AMES CONSTRUCTION 500.00 Anderson Joan 12/19/2019 101-1539-4300 Pickleball Lessons 75.00 Anderson Joan 75.00 Aspen Equipment 01/02/2020 700-0000-4140 Parts 461.22 Aspen Equipment 01/02/2020 101-1320-4120 Return -377.71 Aspen Equipment 83.51 ASPEN MILLS 01/02/2020 101-1220-4240 Clothing 142.35 ASPEN MILLS 142.35 BCA 12/05/2019 101-1120-4300 BACKGROUND CHECK 90.00 BCA 12/12/2019 101-1120-4300 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION 30.00 BCA 12/19/2019 101-1120-4300 Background Check 30.00 BCA 12/26/2019 101-1120-4300 BACKGROUND CHECK 15.00 BCA 165.00 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 12/26/2019 101-1550-4300 FALL CLEAN UP SERVICES 295.00 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 295.00 Blazanin Mary 12/19/2019 101-1565-4130 Supplies, memory cafe, music speaker 123.91 Blazanin Mary 123.91 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 12/19/2019 101-1220-4510 lamps for outside ballards -35.49 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 12/19/2019 101-1220-4510 Lamps 32.01 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 12/19/2019 101-1220-4510 Lamps/Ballast 140.90 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 1 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/02/2020 101-1220-4510 Supplies 192.15 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/02/2020 101-1370-4510 Supplies 327.53 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 657.10 Brookside Garden Center, Inc.12/05/2019 101-1550-4150 DIRT 118.11 Brookside Garden Center, Inc. 118.11 Burke Charlie 01/02/2020 101-1320-4240 Clothing allowance 340.02 Burke Charlie 340.02 BURNET TITLE 12/19/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 36.69 BURNET TITLE 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.29 BURNET TITLE 41.98 CABIN FEVER SPORTING GOODS 12/19/2019 101-1611-4130 February Festival 2020 Prizes 1,920.85 CABIN FEVER SPORTING GOODS 1,920.85 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER 01/02/2020 601-0000-4300 Joint Powers Agreement - Arboretum Area - Project 188857 11,309.93 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER 11,309.93 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 01/02/2020 400-4124-4703 REPLACEMENT SCANNER 878.74 CDW GOVERNMENT LLC 878.74 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 700-7043-4320 2100 LAKE HARRISON RD 825.86 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 700-7019-4320 201 W 79TH ST 331.70 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 101-1190-4320 7711 KERBER BLVD 1,006.59 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 700-0000-4320 2323 LAKE LUCY RD 27.03 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 101-1170-4320 7700 MARKET BLVD 891.71 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 101-1550-4320 1456 W 78TH ST 248.79 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 701-0000-4320 3900 HIGHWAY 7, EXCELSIOR 17.30 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/12/2019 101-1600-4320 6930 MINNEWASHTA PKWY 20.70 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/19/2019 101-1370-4320 Service address - 7901 Park Pl 1,256.95 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/19/2019 700-0000-4320 Service address - 7901 Park Pl 157.12 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/19/2019 701-0000-4320 Service address - 7901 Park Pl 157.12 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/19/2019 101-1220-4320 City of Chanhassen 533.15 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/19/2019 101-1530-4320 City of Chanhassen 144.94 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 12/19/2019 101-1171-4320 City of Chanhassen 59.08 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 5,678.04 CenturyLink 12/12/2019 700-0000-4310 MONTHLY SERVICE DEC 1 TO DEC 31 32.00 CenturyLink 12/12/2019 701-0000-4310 MONTHLY SERVICE DEC 1 TO DEC 31 32.00 CenturyLink 12/26/2019 700-7043-4310 WASTE WATER BLDG 59.63 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1190-4310 LIBRARY 127.20 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1540-4310 CITY 95.40 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 700-0000-4310 CITY 15.12 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 700-7019-4310 CITY 210.28 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 701-0000-4310 CITY 15.13 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1160-4320 CITY 250.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 2 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1170-4310 CITY 824.03 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 700-0000-4310 CITY 6.36 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 701-0000-4310 CITY 6.36 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1550-4310 CITY 30.04 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1350-4310 CITY 30.04 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1220-4310 CITY 33.04 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1370-4310 CITY 50.88 CENTURYLINK 12/05/2019 101-1160-4320 CITY 125.00 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1540-4310 Phone Charges 95.40 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 700-0000-4310 Phone Charges 15.13 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 700-7019-4310 Phone Charges 210.27 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 701-0000-4310 Phone Charges 15.13 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1160-4320 Phone Charges 250.00 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1170-4310 Phone Charges 829.64 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 700-0000-4310 Phone Charges 6.36 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 701-0000-4310 Phone Charges 6.36 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1550-4310 Phone Charges 30.04 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1350-4310 Phone Charges 30.04 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1220-4310 Phone Charges 33.04 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1370-4310 Phone Charges 50.88 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1160-4320 Phone Charges 125.00 CENTURYLINK 01/02/2020 101-1190-4310 Library - Phone Charges 127.20 CENTURYLINK 3,767.00 Chanhassen West 79th St LLC 12/19/2019 300-0000-4300 Furnish and Install ornamental fencing 3,535.00 Chanhassen West 79th St LLC 3,535.00 CITY OF CHASKA 12/12/2019 101-1560-4300 "RIPCORD" PLAY OUTING 624.03 CITY OF CHASKA 624.03 Compass Minerals America, Inc 12/12/2019 101-1320-4150 MATERIALS 6,343.84 Compass Minerals America, Inc 12/26/2019 101-1320-4150 BULK COARSE LA - HWY 3,946.51 Compass Minerals America, Inc 10,290.35 Complete Cooling Systems 01/02/2020 101-1320-4140 Supplies 461.50 Complete Cooling Systems 461.50 CORE & MAIN LP 01/02/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 442.20 CORE & MAIN LP 01/02/2020 700-0000-4550 Parts 2,913.33 CORE & MAIN LP 3,355.53 CROWN COLLEGE 12/12/2019 101-1220-4370 EMT REFRESH 750.00 CROWN COLLEGE 750.00 CUB FOODS 12/05/2019 101-1220-4290 COFFEE 34.97 CUB FOODS 12/05/2019 101-1220-4290 FOOD 41.49 CUB FOODS 76.46 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 3 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Culligan Bottled Water 12/12/2019 101-1220-4300 7610 LAREDO DR 223.53 Culligan Bottled Water 223.53 CUT ABOVE INC 01/02/2020 720-7202-4300 Street & Park Tree Removal 4,700.00 CUT ABOVE INC 4,700.00 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 12/12/2019 101-1170-4510 REPAIR BROKEN TOILET 151.58 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 151.58 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 12/12/2019 101-1370-4260 EQUIPMENT 704.60 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/02/2020 101-1370-4260 Tools 436.95 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/02/2020 101-1370-4260 Tools 19.80 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 1,161.35 DEMBINSKI JOHN & KATHLEEN 12/12/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.92 DEMBINSKI JOHN & KATHLEEN 12/12/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.22 DEMBINSKI JOHN & KATHLEEN 12/12/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.78 DEMBINSKI JOHN & KATHLEEN 12/12/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.11 DEMBINSKI JOHN & KATHLEEN 17.03 DEM-CON LANDFILL 12/26/2019 101-1320-4150 DISPOSAL 77.53 DEM-CON LANDFILL 77.53 DOOR TECH SYSTEMS 12/26/2019 101-1220-4510 LIFT STATION 24 OVERHEAD DOOR WORK 245.20 DOOR TECH SYSTEMS 12/26/2019 101-1220-4510 MAIN FIRE STATION DOOR 132.00 DOOR TECH SYSTEMS 377.20 Dowds Troon 12/12/2019 101-1220-4290 FFOY TROPHY UPDATE 8.60 Dowds Troon 8.60 Duchon Douglas & Rebecca 12/12/2019 101-1320-4150 DAMAGED MAILBOX 30.00 Duchon Douglas & Rebecca 30.00 Earl F Andersen Inc 12/12/2019 101-1320-4560 CHANNEL POST 368.20 Earl F Andersen Inc 368.20 Eden Prairie Appliance LLC 12/12/2019 101-1170-4530 MOTOR FOR REFRIGERATOR 69.82 Eden Prairie Appliance LLC 69.82 EDEN TRACE CORPORATION 12/26/2019 601-0000-4902 60,000.00 EDEN TRACE CORPORATION 60,000.00 EDINA REALTY 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 56.37 EDINA REALTY 12/19/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 96.30 EDINA REALTY 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 20.19 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 4 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount EDINA REALTY 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.69 EDINA REALTY 175.55 EGAN COMPANY 12/19/2019 101-1370-4530 Replace the condenser coil 3,488.00 EGAN COMPANY 3,488.00 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 700-0000-4300 2019 Utility Study 1,100.83 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 701-0000-4300 2019 Utility Study 1,100.83 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 720-0000-4300 2019 Utility Study 1,100.84 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 3,302.50 EPIC EVENT RENTAL 12/19/2019 101-1600-4300 Contract # C-011630 260.92 EPIC EVENT RENTAL 260.92 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 12/19/2019 101-1220-4070 2019 Quarterly Payment for Fire Dept Admin Services 8,812.00 EXCELSIOR FIRE DISTRICT 8,812.00 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/12/2019 101-1320-4120 BRAKE CLEAN 35.80 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/12/2019 101-1550-4120 BRAKE CLEAN 35.80 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/12/2019 700-0000-4120 BRAKE CLEAN 35.80 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/12/2019 101-1220-4140 BATTERY 210.44 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 12/26/2019 700-0000-4140 VEHICLE SUPPLIES 102.19 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 01/02/2020 101-1320-4140 Parts 203.73 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 623.76 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/02/2020 700-7043-4510 DRAIN GRATE 1,317.88 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 1,317.88 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 01/02/2020 700-0000-4250 MTR HIGH GN KITS 23,470.81 Ferguson Waterworks #2518 23,470.81 Fire Safety USA 12/05/2019 101-1220-4120 LIGHTED SAFETY CONES 220.00 Fire Safety USA 12/05/2019 101-1220-4120 LIGHTED SAFETY CONES 65.00 Fire Safety USA 12/05/2019 101-1220-4260 ZICO AXE AND HOOLIGAN BAR TWO PIECE 143.00 Fire Safety USA 01/02/2020 101-1220-4260 PARTS 110.00 Fire Safety USA 538.00 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 12/12/2019 101-0000-2033 2173 BINKER STREET - PERMIT 2019-03221 7.95 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 12/12/2019 101-0000-2033 2173 BINKER STREET - PERMIT 2019-03201 7.95 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 15.90 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.05 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 12/19/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.53 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.31 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.45 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 5 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 12.34 First Systems Technology, Inc.12/26/2019 700-0000-4300 TOWER 3 ANTENNA MOVE 300.00 First Systems Technology, Inc. 300.00 Gassen Company, AAMC 12/19/2019 720-7202-4300 Tree Removal - Oak Ponds Tree Removal 1,425.94 Gassen Company, AAMC 1,425.94 GESKE GREGG 12/05/2019 101-1220-4370 FOAM MANIFOLD 204.91 GESKE GREGG 204.91 GFOA 12/26/2019 101-1130-4360 Greg Sticha - 300066036 225.00 GFOA 225.00 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS INC 12/26/2019 101-1320-4540 GUARDRAIL REPAIR - BLUFF CREEK BLVD 4,439.46 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS INC 4,439.46 Golf Lakes Condos 01/02/2020 815-8221-2024 Escrow Release - Golf Lakes Condos 32,277.97 Golf Lakes Condos 32,277.97 Great River Greening 12/19/2019 720-7202-4300 Chan Nature Preserve Mgmt Work 2,061.20 Great River Greening 2,061.20 GREEN MEADOWS INC 12/12/2019 101-1550-4300 SNOW PLOWING 1,210.00 GREEN MEADOWS INC 1,210.00 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1120-4040 LTD DECEMBER 70.40 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1130-4040 LTD DECEMBER 49.38 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1160-4040 LTD DECEMBER 26.39 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1250-4040 LTD DECEMBER 90.92 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1310-4040 LTD DECEMBER 71.02 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1320-4040 LTD DECEMBER 114.63 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1370-4040 LTD DECEMBER 46.30 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1520-4040 LTD DECEMBER 35.96 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1530-4040 LTD DECEMBER 14.61 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1560-4040 LTD DECEMBER 11.99 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1600-4040 LTD DECEMBER 25.53 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1700-4040 LTD DECEMBER 2.84 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1550-4040 LTD DECEMBER 94.49 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1420-4040 LTD DECEMBER 80.50 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1430-4040 LTD DECEMBER 4.81 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 210-0000-4040 LTD DECEMBER 18.03 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 720-7201-4040 LTD DECEMBER 5.68 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 720-7202-4040 LTD DECEMBER 5.68 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1170-4040 LTD DECEMBER 12.61 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 101-1220-4040 LTD DECEMBER 43.14 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 701-0000-4040 LTD DECEMBER 75.04 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 6 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 700-0000-4040 LTD DECEMBER 101.78 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 12/05/2019 720-0000-4040 LTD DECEMBER 22.11 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1120-4040 LTD - January 72.58 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1130-4040 LTD - January 50.38 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1160-4040 LTD - January 27.53 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1250-4040 LTD - January 110.48 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1310-4040 LTD - January 74.50 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1320-4040 LTD - January 134.71 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1370-4040 LTD - January 47.33 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1520-4040 LTD - January 36.38 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1530-4040 LTD - January 15.05 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1560-4040 LTD - January 12.59 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1600-4040 LTD - January 26.02 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1700-4040 LTD - January 2.89 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1550-4040 LTD - January 95.59 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1420-4040 LTD - January 83.36 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1430-4040 LTD - January 5.00 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 210-0000-4040 LTD - January 18.67 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 720-7201-4040 LTD - January 5.90 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 720-7202-4040 LTD - January 5.90 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1170-4040 LTD - January 12.87 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 101-1220-4040 LTD - January 44.02 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 701-0000-4040 LTD - January 78.45 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 700-0000-4040 LTD - January 115.56 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 01/02/2020 720-0000-4040 LTD - January 23.98 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 2,123.58 HEINEN ROBERT 01/02/2020 101-1550-4240 CLOTHING 104.96 HEINEN ROBERT 104.96 Hoops & Threads LLC 12/05/2019 700-0000-4240 CUSTOM EMBROIDERY 9.00 Hoops & Threads LLC 01/02/2020 701-0000-4240 Custom Embroidery 13.50 Hoops & Threads LLC 01/02/2020 700-0000-4240 Custom Embroidery 13.50 Hoops & Threads LLC 36.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/05/2019 101-0000-2009 12/6/2019 #304303 1,060.42 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/05/2019 700-0000-2009 12/6/2019 #304303 152.49 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/05/2019 701-0000-2009 12/6/2019 #304303 152.50 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/05/2019 720-0000-2009 12/6/2019 #304303 1.26 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/19/2019 101-0000-2009 12/20/2019 #304303 1,060.42 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/19/2019 700-0000-2009 12/20/2019 #304303 152.50 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/19/2019 701-0000-2009 12/20/2019 #304303 152.50 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 12/19/2019 720-0000-2009 12/20/2019 #304303 1.25 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/02/2020 101-0000-2009 01/03/2020 #304303 1,102.16 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/02/2020 700-0000-2009 01/03/2020 #304303 152.49 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/02/2020 701-0000-2009 01/03/2020 #304303 152.50 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/02/2020 720-0000-2009 01/03/2020 #304303 1.26 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 4,141.75 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 12/05/2019 101-1250-4370 ERIC TESSMAN TRAINING 480.00 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 12/05/2019 101-1250-4370 BOB SULLIVAN 320.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 7 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 12/05/2019 101-1250-4370 JEFFREY KEOGH TRAINING 480.00 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 12/05/2019 101-1250-4370 PAUL EKHOLM 480.00 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 1,760.00 IUOE Local #49 12/05/2019 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 Local 49 dues 455.23 IUOE Local #49 12/05/2019 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 Local 49 dues 178.70 IUOE Local #49 12/05/2019 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 Local 49 dues 66.07 IUOE Local #49 01/02/2020 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 Local 49 dues 447.99 IUOE Local #49 01/02/2020 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 Local 49 dues 153.80 IUOE Local #49 01/02/2020 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 Local 49 dues 63.21 IUOE Local #49 1,365.00 Jaguar Communications Inc 12/12/2019 700-7043-4310 WATER PLANT - FIBER BUS LINE 53.60 Jaguar Communications Inc 53.60 Johnson Don 01/02/2020 101-1220-4300 Drop Box Account for FD iPads 12.87 Johnson Don 12.87 Jones David 12/12/2019 101-1560-4300 MOUNT RUSHMORE PRESENTATION 100.00 Jones David 100.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 12/26/2019 101-1550-4300 PARKING LAMP LIGHTS 925.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 925.00 KABANUK LANCE 12/05/2019 101-1320-4150 SNOWBLOWER REPAIR. 223.06 KABANUK LANCE 223.06 KARUS KYLE & KATHLEEN 12/12/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 29.26 KARUS KYLE & KATHLEEN 29.26 KENDALLVILLE FARMS 12/05/2019 101-1600-4300 2019 TREE LIGHTING LIVE REINDEER 800.00 KENDALLVILLE FARMS 800.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 12/19/2019 605-6501-4300 Acquistion of Right of Way for C.R.101 12,850.60 KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 12,850.60 KOCH DORTHY 12/19/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.09 KOCH DORTHY 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.69 KOCH DORTHY 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.39 KOCH DORTHY 3.17 KODIAK CUSTOM LETTERING 01/02/2020 101-1220-4240 duty crew shirts 504.00 KODIAK CUSTOM LETTERING 504.00 Koehnen Jason 12/12/2019 101-1550-4240 clothing allowance 179.96 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 8 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Koehnen Jason 179.96 K-TECH SPECIALTY COATINGS, INC 12/26/2019 101-1320-4150 MATERIALS 722.55 K-TECH SPECIALTY COATINGS, INC 722.55 KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 12/05/2019 720-0000-4751 CARVER BEACH STORM REPAIRS 19,685.00 KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 19,685.00 LANDTITLE 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.38 LANDTITLE 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.41 LANDTITLE 12/19/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.01 LANDTITLE 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.81 LANDTITLE 10.61 Lano Equipment 12/12/2019 101-1550-4120 PARTS 147.77 Lano Equipment 147.77 LARSON COMPANY J.H.12/12/2019 101-1190-4510 LAMPS 110.20 LARSON COMPANY J.H. 110.20 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 12/26/2019 101-1170-4483 INSURANCE 232.50 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 232.50 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 12/19/2019 101-1170-4483 Workers Compensation Coverage Premium 60,715.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/02/2020 101-1170-4483 INSURANCE 1,935.77 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 62,650.77 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 01/02/2020 101-1140-4302 Labor Relation Services 1,093.34 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 1,093.34 Maus Kerry 12/19/2019 101-1539-4300 LINE DANCING 306.00 Maus Kerry 306.00 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 12/19/2019 101-1220-4130 HOLDER, GLOVE BOX 34.39 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 12/26/2019 101-1220-4120 Holder, Glove Box Tech-Med 27.39 McKesson Medical-Surgical Inc 61.78 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 12/12/2019 700-0000-4150 PARTS 58.84 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 12/19/2019 700-0000-4150 Materials 59.74 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 118.58 MEHDIZADEH BRANDON & KRISTIN 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.64 MEHDIZADEH BRANDON & KRISTIN 12/19/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.41 MEHDIZADEH BRANDON & KRISTIN 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.44 MEHDIZADEH BRANDON & KRISTIN 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.44 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 9 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MEHDIZADEH BRANDON & KRISTIN 30.93 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 12/12/2019 701-0000-4509 WASTE WATER SERVICES 172,654.49 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 172,654.49 Milbank Winwater Works 12/12/2019 700-0000-4552 HARDWARE 652.88 Milbank Winwater Works 652.88 MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD01/02/2020 101-1220-4300 Certification - Elijah Bach, Mollie Tokarczyk 240.00 MINNESOTA FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 240.00 Minnesota UC Fund 12/12/2019 720-0000-4060 Unemployment-3rd quarter 6,812.34 Minnesota UC Fund 6,812.34 Minuteman Press 12/26/2019 101-1170-4110 Priya Tandon Business Cards 16.00 Minuteman Press 16.00 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 12/05/2019 601-6039-4752 18-02 PROJECT 207.38 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 207.38 MN FALLS EXPO 12/12/2019 101-1320-4370 public works general registration 270.00 MN FALLS EXPO 270.00 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/05/2019 210-0000-2011 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 4.02 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/05/2019 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.59 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/05/2019 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.61 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/05/2019 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 0.79 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 12/05/2019 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 NCPERS-Life Insurance 55.99 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/02/2020 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 56.07 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/02/2020 210-0000-2011 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 3.93 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/02/2020 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.60 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/02/2020 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.60 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/02/2020 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 NCPERS-Life Insurance 0.80 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 160.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 01/02/2020 701-0000-4370 Wasterwater Certification renewal - SB-4522 23.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 23.00 MN Rural Water Association 01/02/2020 700-0000-4360 Membership Jan 2020 - Jan 2021 300.00 MN Rural Water Association 300.00 MURRAY PAMELA 12/26/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 31.58 MURRAY PAMELA 12/26/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 48.69 MURRAY PAMELA 12/26/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.57 MURRAY PAMELA 12/26/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.37 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 10 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MURRAY PAMELA 90.21 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 12/12/2019 601-6038-4751 Orchard Lane Area Street Recon 25,849.33 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 12/19/2019 300-0000-4300 W 79TH STREET CROSSING 19,985.00 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 12/26/2019 601-6044-4751 BLUFF CREEK TRAIL REHAB 229,913.39 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC 275,747.72 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 145.93 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 12/05/2019 700-0000-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 5,922.13 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 12/05/2019 701-0000-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 3,138.54 NOVEL SOLAR THREE, LLC 9,206.60 OLSON CABINETS & WOODWORKING 12/26/2019 101-1170-4300 MAPLE ROOM KITCHENETTE MICROWAVE CABINET 284.00 OLSON CABINETS & WOODWORKING 284.00 Pitney Bowes Inc.12/05/2019 101-1170-4110 POSTAGE MACHINE 99.98 Pitney Bowes Inc.12/05/2019 101-1170-4110 POSTAGE MACHINE 713.94 Pitney Bowes Inc. 813.92 POSTMASTER 12/05/2019 101-1120-4330 BOX 147 100.00 POSTMASTER 12/05/2019 101-1220-4300 BOX 97 - FIRE DEPT 100.00 POSTMASTER 12/31/2019 700-0000-4330 Utility Statements 314.88 POSTMASTER 12/31/2019 701-0000-4330 Utility Statements 314.87 POSTMASTER 829.75 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 12/12/2019 700-0000-4350 GENERAL CLEANING - NOV 2019 SATURDAY 50.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 12/12/2019 701-0000-4350 GENERAL CLEANING - NOV 2019 SATURDAY 50.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 12/12/2019 101-1370-4350 GENERAL CLEANING - NOV 2019 SATURDAY 400.00 Quality First Janitorial & Maintenance Inc 500.00 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 12/19/2019 720-7202-4300 FOXWOODS PARK PRUNING 696.00 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 12/19/2019 720-7202-4300 CARVER BEACH ROAD BLVD TREE REMOVAL 2,070.00 RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 2,766.00 RICHARD & KATHERINE 12/26/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.87 RICHARD & KATHERINE 12/26/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 29.66 RICHARD & KATHERINE 12/26/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.61 RICHARD & KATHERINE 12/26/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.81 RICHARD & KATHERINE 64.95 ROERICK BRIAN 12/12/2019 101-1370-4240 clothing allowance 350.70 ROERICK BRIAN 350.70 ROSELYN CARPET CLEANERS LLC 12/26/2019 101-1170-4300 CARPET CLEANING 90.00 ROSELYN CARPET CLEANERS LLC 90.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 11 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount SABRE HEATING & AIR COND.12/05/2019 101-1250-3305 PERMIT FEE 338.74 SABRE HEATING & AIR COND.12/05/2019 101-1250-3305 PERMIT FEE 422.58 SABRE HEATING & AIR COND. 761.32 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1120-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 148.30 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1130-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 84.83 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1160-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 44.49 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1250-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 207.62 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1310-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 175.29 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1320-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 274.36 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1370-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 87.50 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1520-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 44.49 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1530-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 29.66 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1560-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 29.66 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1600-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 53.39 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1700-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 5.93 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1550-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 244.70 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1420-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 134.95 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1430-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 7.42 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 210-0000-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 37.08 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 720-7201-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 14.83 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 720-7202-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 14.83 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1170-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 29.66 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1220-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 59.32 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 701-0000-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 163.28 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 700-0000-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 222.60 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 720-0000-4040 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 80.68 Sand Creek EAP, LLC.01/02/2020 101-1220-4483 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 1,305.13 Sand Creek EAP, LLC. 3,500.00 Schmieg Greg 12/19/2019 101-1370-4240 Clothing Allowance 226.94 Schmieg Greg 226.94 SCHROER BEVERLY & RONALD 12/12/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.80 SCHROER BEVERLY & RONALD 12/12/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.18 SCHROER BEVERLY & RONALD 12/12/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.16 SCHROER BEVERLY & RONALD 12/12/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.07 SCHROER BEVERLY & RONALD 5.21 SCHULSTAD CRAIG & LOIS 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 178.92 SCHULSTAD CRAIG & LOIS 12/19/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 95.81 SCHULSTAD CRAIG & LOIS 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 24.33 SCHULSTAD CRAIG & LOIS 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.24 SCHULSTAD CRAIG & LOIS 302.30 SCHWOCHOW ELIZABETH 12/05/2019 101-1539-3631 WITHDRAWAL FROM TAI CHI 36.00 SCHWOCHOW ELIZABETH 36.00 SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 12/05/2019 101-1220-4370 BURN TOWER USE FEE 1,800.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 12 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount SCOTT COUNTY TREASURER 1,800.00 Senja Inc 12/19/2019 101-1539-4300 Tai Chi 57.60 Senja Inc 57.60 SESAC 01/02/2020 101-1530-4300 MUSIC PERFORMANCE LICENSE 460.00 SESAC 460.00 Shaw James M.12/19/2019 101-1560-4300 PIANO ENTERTAINMENT 95.00 Shaw James M. 95.00 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 12/12/2019 101-1190-4260 TOOLS 2.99 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 12/12/2019 101-1220-4260 TOOLS 62.99 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 12/12/2019 101-1220-4350 CLEANING SUPPLIES 16.98 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 82.96 SIEGLE CHARLES 12/19/2019 101-1370-4240 Clothing Allowance 425.00 SIEGLE CHARLES 425.00 SIR LINES-A-LOT 12/12/2019 300-0000-4300 STRIPING FOR TEQUILLA BUTCHER MEDIAN 3,835.20 SIR LINES-A-LOT 3,835.20 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 12/12/2019 720-7201-4300 FALL YARD WASTE RECYCLING 2,276.30 SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 2,276.30 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 12/12/2019 101-1160-4220 ADAUDIT ANNUAL RENEWAL 942.64 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 12/19/2019 101-1160-4220 NETZOOM STENCILES 661.50 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 1,604.14 STATE OF MINNESOTA 12/26/2019 101-1320-4140 INSPECTION DECALS 26.67 STATE OF MINNESOTA 12/26/2019 101-1550-4140 INSPECTION DECALS 26.67 STATE OF MINNESOTA 12/26/2019 700-0000-4140 INSPECTION DECALS 26.66 STATE OF MINNESOTA 80.00 Tessman Eric 12/26/2019 101-1250-4130 OFFICIALS MEETING 31.35 Tessman Eric 31.35 The Osseo Construction Company LLC 12/05/2019 700-7050-4751 WATER TOWN NO 3 REHABILITATION 150,000.00 The Osseo Construction Company LLC 12/05/2019 700-7051-4751 WATER TOWN NO 3 REHABILITATION 139,447.19 The Osseo Construction Company LLC 289,447.19 THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 12/26/2019 410-0000-4706 park equipment replacement 4,340.00 THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 12/26/2019 410-0000-4706 park equipment replacement 3,394.74 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 13 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount THEIS CONSTRUCTION CO 7,734.74 TITLE CHOICE LLC 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.28 TITLE CHOICE LLC 13.28 TONYA BATES 12/12/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.19 TONYA BATES 12/12/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.67 TONYA BATES 12/12/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.59 TONYA BATES 12/12/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.41 TONYA BATES 10.86 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 15.37 TRADEMARK TITLE SERVICES INC 15.37 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 12/05/2019 101-1250-4370 ROBERT SULLIVAN TRAINING 135.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 135.00 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 01/02/2020 700-0000-4550 Co Rd 101 and Kurvers Pt 4,197.00 VALLEY-RICH CO INC 4,197.00 Veolia Environmental Services 01/02/2020 101-1170-4350 Recycle 189.25 Veolia Environmental Services 189.25 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 12/12/2019 701-0000-4150 PARTS 66.04 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/02/2020 101-1220-4510 Ballast 42.34 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 108.38 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 101-1370-4350 PUBLIC WORKS 121.47 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 700-0000-4350 PUBLIC WORKS 15.19 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 701-0000-4350 PUBLIC WORKS 15.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 101-1550-4350 PUBLIC WORKS 477.99 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 101-1220-4350 WEST FIRE STATION 30.38 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 101-1190-4350 CHANHASSEN LIBRARY 240.59 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 101-1220-4350 MAIN FIRE STATION 224.22 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 12/12/2019 101-1170-4350 CITY HALL 205.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,330.68 WATERMARK TITLE 12/05/2019 720-0000-2020 REFUND CHECK 7.68 WATERMARK TITLE 7.68 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 12/19/2019 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.39 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.98 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 12/19/2019 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 18.24 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 12/19/2019 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 30.88 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 57.49 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 14 of 15 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Wegner Michael 01/02/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing allowance - Runnings 219.95 Wegner Michael 01/02/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing allowance - Steel Toe Shoes 159.99 Wegner Michael 01/02/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing allowance - Amazon - shirts 13.27 Wegner Michael 01/02/2020 700-0000-4240 Clothing allowance - Amazon - shirts 31.79 Wegner Michael 425.00 WEIDEMA INC SR 12/05/2019 815-8221-2024 METER DEPOSIT 3,500.00 WEIDEMA INC SR 3,500.00 WING RICHARD 12/19/2019 101-1220-4350 100.00 WING RICHARD 100.00 1,103,734.53 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/04/2020 - 1:40 PM)Page 15 of 15 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM Name Check D Account Description Amount ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 12/19/2019 101-1538-4300 Kwan Tae Kwon Do Association 2,050.00 ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 2,050.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 12/12/2019 101-1170-4300 MONTHLY SERVICE 131.25 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 12/12/2019 101-1190-4300 QUARTERLY SERVICE- LIBRARY 270.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 01/02/2020 101-1170-4300 Monthly Service 131.25 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 532.50 AED SUPERSTORE 12/17/2019 101-1220-4370 Rescue Randy 1,302.03 AED SUPERSTORE 1,302.03 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 12/05/2019 101-1220-4530 COMPRESSOR AIR QUALITY TEST 140.00 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 140.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 12/19/2019 101-1533-4300 Rec Center Personal Training 525.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 525.00 ALLIED BLACKTOP 12/12/2019 420-0000-4751 2019 SEALCOAT PROJECT 15,398.95 ALLIED BLACKTOP 15,398.95 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1220-4120 iPad Case 42.94 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES MAPLE ROOM 119.98 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES MAPLE ROOM 47.22 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 20.14 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 27.77 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 39.81 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1170-4110 office supplies Maple Room 24.15 Amazon 12/17/2019 700-0000-4170 Compressor Oil 105.75 Amazon 12/17/2019 700-0000-4170 Grease 43.92 Amazon 12/17/2019 700-0000-4150 Desktop Stand 79.54 Amazon 12/17/2019 700-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 111.65 Amazon 12/17/2019 601-6038-4290 Wire Connector 34.34 Amazon 12/17/2019 101-1530-4130 Instant Cold Packs 46.92 Amazon 12/17/2019 101-1530-4120 Whiteboard 128.74 Amazon 12/17/2019 101-1220-4290 Laundry Detergent 101.84 Amazon 12/17/2019 101-1220-4290 Squeegee 70.16 Amazon 12/17/2019 101-1170-4110 office supplies 53.04 Amazon 12/17/2019 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 46.02 Amazon 12/17/2019 701-0000-4120 Road Lights 41.37 Amazon 12/17/2019 701-0000-4240 Safety Clothing 111.65 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 1 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Amazon 11/18/2019 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 905.00 Amazon 11/18/2019 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 132.49 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1170-4110 Office/Toner 39.89 Amazon 11/18/2019 400-4126-4703 Computers and network hardware 105.93 Amazon 11/18/2019 101-1160-4530 amazon - replacement headband 132.00 Amazon 12/17/2019 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 352.64 Amazon 12/17/2019 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 348.36 Amazon 12/17/2019 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 169.99 Amazon 12/17/2019 400-4126-4703 Maintenance/cables 316.95 Amazon 12/17/2019 101-1160-4530 Repair and maintenance 316.49 Amazon 4,116.69 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 12/26/2019 101-0000-2008 DECEMBER 2019 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 American Legion 11/18/2019 101-1220-4370 EMS Training 12.18 American Legion 12.18 American Planning Association 11/18/2019 101-1420-4370 APA Membership 625.00 American Planning Association 625.00 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 12/05/2019 700-0000-4340 UTILITY STATEMENTS 557.37 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 12/05/2019 701-0000-4340 UTILITY STATEMENTS 557.38 AMERICAN SOLUTIONS 1,114.75 Ames Convention & Visitors Bureau 12/17/2019 101-1560-4300 Overnight Trip to Ames IA 320.00 Ames Convention & Visitors Bureau 320.00 Apple.com 11/18/2019 701-0000-4310 iCloud Storage 0.99 Apple.com 11/18/2019 101-1220-4310 PHONE SET UP 2.99 Apple.com 12/17/2019 101-1220-4290 Storage for iPhone 2.99 Apple.com 12/17/2019 101-1220-4290 Storage for iPhone 5.36 Apple.com 12/17/2019 701-0000-4310 Storage for iPhone 0.99 Apple.com 13.32 Aramark Arboretum 12/17/2019 720-7201-4300 Chan Day At Arb 681.71 Aramark Arboretum 681.71 ARNIE'S 11/18/2019 101-1120-4370 LUNCH MEETING 57.00 ARNIE'S 57.00 Arrowwood Resort 11/18/2019 101-1130-4370 Danielle Hotel receipt 272.26 Arrowwood Resort 11/18/2019 101-1130-4370 Greg Hotel Receipt 433.87 Arrowwood Resort 706.13 Axels 11/18/2019 101-1120-4370 CONTRACT FOR 2020 80.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 2 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Axels 80.00 Batteries Plus 12/17/2019 101-1160-4530 Repair and maintenance 135.92 Batteries Plus 135.92 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 12/12/2019 101-0000-2012 MONTHLY COBRA 104.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 104.00 Best Buy 11/18/2019 700-0000-4140 Installation of equipment 285.79 Best Buy 12/17/2019 700-0000-4310 equipment installation 312.85 Best Buy 12/17/2019 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 94.60 Best Buy 693.24 Blocker & Wallace Service LLC 12/17/2019 700-7043-4150 Oil 95.37 Blocker & Wallace Service LLC 95.37 BOLTON & MENK INC 12/19/2019 601-6045-4300 Chanhassen/Powers Blvd & Lake Lucy Road 5,500.00 BOLTON & MENK INC 5,500.00 Boyer Ford Trucks 12/26/2019 101-1320-4140 Supplies 481.16 Boyer Ford Trucks 12/26/2019 101-1320-4140 Supplies 86.28 Boyer Ford Trucks 12/26/2019 101-1320-4140 Supplies -64.80 Boyer Ford Trucks 502.64 BP 11/18/2019 101-1370-4170 Truck Inspection 41.51 BP 41.51 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 12/05/2019 720-0000-4300 REPORTS 2,191.40 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 12/26/2019 601-6038-4751 Orchard Lane Area CP 18-01 1,675.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 3,866.90 Breezy Point Resort 11/18/2019 101-1420-4370 MN Chapter of American Planning 127.78 Breezy Point Resort 127.78 Cafe Thyme 11/18/2019 101-1110-4370 CITY COUNCIL DINNER 148.22 Cafe Thyme 12/17/2019 101-1110-4370 City Council Dinner 148.22 Cafe Thyme 296.44 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 12/12/2019 101-1140-4302 LEGAL SERVICES 13,537.23 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 13,537.23 Carhartt 12/17/2019 700-0000-4240 Clothing Allowance 74.98 Carhartt 12/17/2019 700-0000-4240 Clothing Allowance 349.91 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 3 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Carhartt 424.89 Caribou Coffee 11/18/2019 101-1120-4370 COFFEE MEETING W PLANNING 7.49 Caribou Coffee 7.49 Carver County 12/05/2019 101-1150-4300 2019 ASSESSMENT CONTRACT 146,527.60 Carver County 12/12/2019 101-1160-4320 Internet - City Hall and Fire Station 540.00 Carver County 12/12/2019 700-7043-4320 Dark Fiber Service - WWTP AND WELL 3 425.00 Carver County 12/12/2019 101-1150-4300 TRUTH IN TAXATION BILLINGS 9,579.74 Carver County 12/12/2019 101-1210-4300 LIQUOR LICENSE - JIMMIES OLD BBQ 100.00 Carver County 157,172.34 Carver County Environmental Center 12/17/2019 720-7201-4300 Jill 159.00 Carver County Environmental Center 159.00 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 101-1220-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 79.08 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 2,064.96 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 101-1540-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 232.24 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 101-1550-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 247.32 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 101-1600-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 18.96 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 700-0000-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 72.70 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 700-7019-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 1,155.13 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 12/05/2019 701-0000-4320 NOVEMBER 2019 843.06 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 4,713.45 Centro Print Solutions 12/19/2019 101-1130-4340 Legal forms 229.06 Centro Print Solutions 229.06 Chanhassen Dinner Theatre 11/18/2019 101-1560-4300 Dinner Theater Deposit 360.00 Chanhassen Dinner Theatre 360.00 Chanhassen Floral 11/18/2019 101-1110-4300 gift 48.95 Chanhassen Floral 48.95 Chef Craig's Catering 12/12/2019 101-1560-4300 HOLIDAY PARTY LUNCH 1,883.99 Chef Craig's Catering 1,883.99 Chick-Fil-A 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 Lunch 15.14 Chick-Fil-A 15.14 Chipotle Mexican Grill 12/17/2019 101-1220-4290 Duty Crew Dinner 34.90 Chipotle Mexican Grill 34.90 Chocolaterie Stam 11/18/2019 101-1560-4300 Iowa Overnight Trip 114.08 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 4 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Chocolaterie Stam 114.08 Choice, Inc.12/26/2019 101-1220-4350 For work completed 10/14/19 - 11/08/19 193.92 Choice, Inc. 193.92 Claim Jumper 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 Dinner 34.00 Claim Jumper 34.00 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 01/02/2020 101-1220-4530 Monitors 125.00 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 125.00 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/02/2020 101-0000-2008 INSURANCE 60.72 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/02/2020 700-0000-2008 INSURANCE 36.93 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 01/02/2020 701-0000-2008 INSURANCE 36.93 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 134.58 COMFORT SUITES CANAL PARK 11/18/2019 700-0000-4370 Conference 992.10 COMFORT SUITES CANAL PARK 11/18/2019 700-0000-4370 Conference 992.10 COMFORT SUITES CANAL PARK 11/18/2019 700-0000-4370 Conference 706.94 COMFORT SUITES CANAL PARK 12/17/2019 101-1220-4370 Chiefs Conference 721.95 COMFORT SUITES CANAL PARK 3,413.09 CompressorPros 12/17/2019 700-7043-4150 Oil 55.98 CompressorPros 55.98 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.12/12/2019 101-1160-4220 1 YEAR SUPPORT 6,923.40 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.12/26/2019 400-4126-4703 QUEST RAPID RECOVER CORE LICENSE 1,175.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/02/2020 101-1160-4300 NETWORK SERVICES RETAINER 4,000.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/02/2020 101-1160-4220 PW CHASSIS SWITCH - REPLACEMENT 11,780.69 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 23,879.09 Corporate Card Annual Fee 12/17/2019 101-1130-4300 Corporate Card Annual Fee - Bill Kistner 12.00 Corporate Card Annual Fee 12/17/2019 101-1130-4300 Corporate Card Annual Fee - Don Nutter 12.00 Corporate Card Annual Fee 24.00 Costco Wholesale 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 25.98 Costco Wholesale 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 532.07 Costco Wholesale 558.05 Country Inn & Suites 11/18/2019 101-1560-4300 Iowa Overnight Trip - Lodging 2,352.00 Country Inn & Suites 2,352.00 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 101-1370-4350 Cleaning Supplies 38.46 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 White Vinegar 20.34 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 101-1110-4300 Mollie Lloyd Accident 36.48 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 Peroxide, White Vinegar 14.33 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 5 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Cub Foods 11/18/2019 101-1560-4130 Tea Party Supplies 22.53 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 720-7201-4300 Workshop refreshments - Energy Efficiency 35.41 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 202-0000-4300 Cemetery Walk 14.95 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 101-1560-4130 Celebration 23.99 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 101-1560-4130 MEMORY CAFE OPEN HOUSE 21.46 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 6.43 Cub Foods 12/17/2019 101-1320-4370 annual snow and ice meet for public work crews 54.58 Cub Foods 12/17/2019 101-1560-4300 Snacks 9.11 Cub Foods 12/17/2019 101-1560-4130 Supplies for Sr. Ctr Speaker, Crazy Hat Day Event 37.88 Cub Foods 12/17/2019 101-1560-4300 Senior Breakfast 134.92 Cub Foods 12/17/2019 101-1560-4300 Senior Breakfast - ice 3.98 Cub Foods 12/17/2019 101-1538-4300 Grandparent pumpkin Painting 38.98 Cub Foods 12/17/2019 101-1614-4130 Juice, Donuts 236.54 Cub Foods 11/18/2019 101-1560-4300 Mankato Trip Snack 16.10 Cub Foods 766.47 DAHL TERRY 12/19/2019 101-1538-4300 Chungdo Kwan Tae Kwon Do Association 530.00 DAHL TERRY 530.00 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.12/12/2019 101-1170-4260 KITCHEN PART 23.09 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC. 23.09 Delta Airlines 11/18/2019 101-1220-4370 Flights 277.10 Delta Airlines 11/18/2019 101-1220-4370 Flights 277.10 Delta Airlines 12/17/2019 101-1220-4370 Baggage Fee for Conference 30.00 Delta Airlines 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 Baggage Fee for Conference 30.00 Delta Airlines 614.20 Delta Dental 01/02/2020 101-0000-2013 DENTAL INSURANCE 1,876.00 Delta Dental 01/02/2020 101-0000-2013 DENTAL INSURANCE 30.20 Delta Dental 01/02/2020 210-0000-2013 DENTAL INSURANCE 24.93 Delta Dental 01/02/2020 700-0000-2013 DENTAL INSURANCE 265.38 Delta Dental 01/02/2020 701-0000-2013 DENTAL INSURANCE 235.18 Delta Dental 01/02/2020 720-0000-2013 DENTAL INSURANCE 118.41 Delta Dental 2,550.10 Domino's Pizza 12/17/2019 101-1614-4130 Rec Center pizza 126.38 Domino's Pizza 126.38 Ebay 11/18/2019 101-1160-4530 Repair and maintenance 8.73 Ebay 11/18/2019 101-1160-4530 Repair and maintenance 2.26 Ebay 10.99 Edley's Bar-B-Que 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 Dinner - ICMA Conference 22.00 Edley's Bar-B-Que 22.00 Electropart 11/18/2019 101-1160-4530 Repair and maintenance 115.96 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 6 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Electropart 115.96 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 12/26/2019 101-1220-4140 PARTS 825.64 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC 825.64 Emergency Response Solutions 01/02/2020 101-1220-4530 PARTS 572.24 Emergency Response Solutions 01/02/2020 101-1220-4530 PARTS 142.84 Emergency Response Solutions 715.08 Enabling Elements Inc 11/18/2019 700-0000-4310 Broad Band Internet Service 15.00 Enabling Elements Inc 12/17/2019 700-0000-4310 Broad Band Internet Service 15.00 Enabling Elements Inc 30.00 Eureka Property Services 12/17/2019 601-6038-4751 Landscaping Work 18-01 Orchard Lane Recon 7,270.50 Eureka Property Services 12/17/2019 601-6032-4751 Landscaping Work 16-01 Street Recon 703.00 Eureka Property Services 7,973.50 Eventbrite 11/18/2019 101-1250-4370 Accessiblity Code 125.00 Eventbrite 11/18/2019 101-1220-4370 SLEEP RECOVERY TRAINING 50.00 Eventbrite 12/17/2019 101-1250-4370 2018 Mixed Occupancies 250.00 Eventbrite 425.00 EXIT 45 RESTAURANT & BAKERY 11/18/2019 101-1220-4370 APPLETON TRAINING 35.54 EXIT 45 RESTAURANT & BAKERY 35.54 Exxon Mobile 12/17/2019 101-1220-4370 Gas From Conference 39.59 Exxon Mobile 39.59 Facebook 11/18/2019 101-1530-4375 CAMPAIGNS 65.70 Facebook 65.70 Fast Measure Distance 12/17/2019 101-1310-4120 Fast Measure Distance Measuring Device 543.50 Fast Measure Distance 543.50 FASTENAL COMPANY 12/05/2019 101-1220-4140 VEHICLE SUPPLIES 4.54 FASTENAL COMPANY 4.54 Ferguson Enterprises #1652 12/17/2019 701-0000-4150 Materials 244.23 Ferguson Enterprises #1652 244.23 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 12/05/2019 700-0000-4250 3 T/F CMPD ECDR 2,457.60 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 2,457.60 Fidelity Security Life 12/19/2019 101-0000-2007 JANUARY 2020 167.67 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 7 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Fidelity Security Life 12/19/2019 210-0000-2007 JANUARY 2020 3.98 Fidelity Security Life 12/19/2019 700-0000-2007 JANUARY 2020 18.03 Fidelity Security Life 12/19/2019 701-0000-2007 JANUARY 2020 11.89 Fidelity Security Life 12/19/2019 720-0000-2007 JANUARY 2020 1.18 Fidelity Security Life 202.75 Fieldhouse Jones Nashville 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 Room for ICMA Conference 1,031.12 Fieldhouse Jones Nashville 1,031.12 Fire Smart Promotions 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 FIRE PREVENTION 483.00 Fire Smart Promotions 12/17/2019 101-1220-4375 Fire Hydrant Tattoo 600.00 Fire Smart Promotions 1,083.00 First Student Charter Center 11/18/2019 202-0000-4300 Transportation Cemetery Walk 630.00 First Student Charter Center 630.00 Fleet Farm 11/18/2019 700-0000-4240 Clothing 55.98 Fleet Farm 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 Duffle Bag 69.77 Fleet Farm 11/18/2019 700-0000-4240 Clothing 9.25 Fleet Farm 11/18/2019 701-0000-4240 Clothing 55.97 Fleet Farm 11/18/2019 701-0000-4240 Clothing 9.24 Fleet Farm 200.21 FORCE AMERICA INC 12/12/2019 101-1320-4310 2019-10 SUBSCRIPTION 140.66 FORCE AMERICA INC 140.66 Fun Express LLC 12/17/2019 101-1614-4130 Halloween Party 231.46 Fun Express LLC 231.46 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 11/18/2019 101-1530-4510 WALL MOUNT FITNESS CENTER 196.25 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC 196.25 Global Industrial Solutions 12/17/2019 700-0000-4170 Oil 1,293.41 Global Industrial Solutions 1,293.41 Goodwill 11/18/2019 101-1560-4120 MAPLE CORNER REMODEL DECOR 22.00 Goodwill 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 107.00 Goodwill 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 288.49 Goodwill 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 17.14 Goodwill 434.63 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 12/05/2019 400-0000-4300 ACCT # MN00238 - 264 AT 1.35 / CANCEL 7 AT -1.35 346.95 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 346.95 Grainger 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 V-belt 139.32 Grainger 11/18/2019 701-0000-4551 Screw-in base 39.20 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 8 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Grainger 12/17/2019 700-0000-4530 parts 48.36 Grainger 12/17/2019 700-0000-4530 parts 111.48 Grainger 12/17/2019 701-0000-4150 Materials 10.90 Grainger 349.26 GS Direct 12/17/2019 101-1170-4110 Office Supplies 49.01 GS Direct 49.01 GS DIRECT INC 01/02/2020 400-4126-4703 REPLACEMENT WIDE FORMAT PRINTER 5,390.00 GS DIRECT INC 5,390.00 Hach Company 12/17/2019 700-7043-4150 Supplies 165.73 Hach Company 12/17/2019 700-0000-4150 Supplies 350.64 Hach Company 516.37 Hallock Company 12/17/2019 701-0000-4150 Materials 115.78 Hallock Company 115.78 Health Strategies 12/19/2019 101-1220-4300 Return to Duty - Dowds, T 175.00 Health Strategies 175.00 Henning Professional Services, Inc 12/05/2019 605-6501-4300 TH101 FROM CSAH 61 TO CSAH 14 3,479.18 Henning Professional Services, Inc 12/26/2019 605-6501-4300 Carty Relocation 234.50 Henning Professional Services, Inc 3,713.68 Hobby Lobby 11/18/2019 101-1560-4120 MAPLE CORNER OPEN HOUSE 13.98 Hobby Lobby 13.98 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 12/19/2019 410-0000-4300 Project 019-035 Chanhassen Lake Ann Trail 21,002.42 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 21,002.42 Holiday Inn & Suites 12/17/2019 101-1220-4370 MSFCA 363.72 Holiday Inn & Suites 363.72 Home Depot 11/18/2019 701-0000-4510 Watersoftener connector 90.87 Home Depot 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 Solbare 50 -34.66 Home Depot 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 Solbare 50, cable ties, pipe insulation 52.31 Home Depot 11/18/2019 700-0000-4260 Mower 428.42 Home Depot 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 AA 36 Pack 17.16 Home Depot 11/18/2019 700-0000-4350 cleaning supplies 84.06 Home Depot 11/18/2019 701-0000-4551 Supplies 98.68 Home Depot 11/18/2019 701-0000-4510 Supplies 92.48 Home Depot 11/18/2019 701-0000-4510 Supplies 163.10 Home Depot 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 179.39 Home Depot 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 77.57 Home Depot 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 468.60 Home Depot 12/17/2019 701-0000-4150 Reflective Marker 38.66 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 9 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Home Depot 12/17/2019 700-0000-4150 Cleaning materials 208.84 Home Depot 12/17/2019 701-0000-4510 Materials -53.65 Home Depot 12/17/2019 701-0000-4510 Supplies 156.23 Home Depot 12/17/2019 700-0000-4150 Fuel Grinder 192.20 Home Depot 12/17/2019 700-0000-4240 Gloves - Safety 8.04 Home Depot 12/17/2019 101-1550-4150 Garland Return -160.93 Home Depot 12/17/2019 101-1550-4150 Lights 32.13 Home Depot 12/17/2019 101-1550-4150 Lights & Garland 178.89 Home Depot 12/17/2019 101-1550-4150 Lights, Garland, Batteries 367.73 Home Depot 12/17/2019 700-0000-4530 Supplies 66.14 Home Depot 12/17/2019 701-0000-4150 Clear Drum Liners 42.89 Home Depot 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 Cobble Step Stone 3.67 Home Depot 12/17/2019 701-0000-4240 Gloves - Safety 8.03 Home Depot 2,806.85 Hydro-Klean LLC 12/26/2019 701-7053-4751 2020 I&I PROJECT SANTIARY SEWER PROJECT 32,338.21 Hydro-Klean LLC 32,338.21 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 12/19/2019 101-1550-4400 Portable Restrooms November 2019 849.75 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 849.75 Indoor Landscapes Inc 12/26/2019 101-1170-4300 December Plant Service 187.00 Indoor Landscapes Inc 187.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/05/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 175.72 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/12/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 17.79 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/19/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 74.87 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/19/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 45.52 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/19/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7.90 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 12/26/2019 101-1170-4110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.94 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 372.74 ISC Sales, INC 11/18/2019 701-0000-4551 Standard Filter 134.25 ISC Sales, INC 134.25 Jaunt Services, Inc.12/17/2019 101-1220-4370 Transportation TPA - Hotel 47.50 Jaunt Services, Inc. 47.50 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 12/12/2019 400-4135-4704 FLAMEFIGHTER 1,284.35 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 12/26/2019 400-4135-4704 PUMP 6,102.10 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 12/26/2019 101-1220-4260 EQUIPMENT 1,300.80 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 12/26/2019 101-1220-4260 EQUIPMENT 84.00 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 8,771.25 K&L Sales, Inc 12/17/2019 101-1370-4260 Conversion Kit 12.95 K&L Sales, Inc 12.95 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 10 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 12/26/2019 101-1370-4170 FUEL 16,868.41 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 16,868.41 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 400-0000-1155 Private Dev Field Observ 12,845.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 601-6043-4752 Minnewashta Parkway Rehab 15,080.59 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 27,925.59 KNOWBE4 INC 11/18/2019 101-1160-4370 Travel and Training Expenses 911.87 KNOWBE4 INC 911.87 Knox Company 12/19/2019 400-4135-4704 ENGINE 1 KEY BOX 1,337.00 Knox Company 1,337.00 Kohls 12/17/2019 700-0000-4240 Clothing - Jeans 126.50 Kohls 12/17/2019 701-0000-4240 Clothing - Jeans 126.50 Kohls 253.00 KREMER SERVICES 12/12/2019 101-1320-4140 PARTS 608.95 KREMER SERVICES 608.95 Kwik Trip 11/18/2019 700-0000-4552 Spring Water 7.98 Kwik Trip 12/17/2019 700-0000-4120 Salt Pallets 48.32 Kwik Trip 56.30 LEEANN CHIN 12/17/2019 101-1110-4370 City Council Dinner 179.31 LEEANN CHIN 179.31 LogMeIn Inc 12/17/2019 101-1160-4300 Fees for Services 375.80 LogMeIn Inc 375.80 Lunds & Byerly's 11/18/2019 101-1560-4300 AARP Class Treats 15.70 Lunds & Byerly's 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 32.04 Lunds & Byerly's 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 18.36 Lunds & Byerly's 66.10 Mackenthun's 12/17/2019 101-1560-4300 Oktoberfest Meal - Catered 470.51 Mackenthun's 470.51 Macqueen Emergengy Group 12/05/2019 400-4135-4704 VELOCITY PUMPER 7,900.66 Macqueen Emergengy Group 12/19/2019 101-1220-4520 AERIAL PLATFORM 229.15 Macqueen Emergengy Group 01/02/2020 101-1220-4520 GRAPHICS 135.03 Macqueen Emergengy Group 8,264.84 Marco Inc 12/12/2019 101-1170-4410 PRINTERS 720.68 Marco Inc 12/12/2019 700-0000-4410 PRINTERS 100.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 11 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Marco Inc 12/12/2019 701-0000-4410 PRINTERS 100.00 Marco Inc 12/12/2019 720-0000-4410 PRINTERS 50.00 Marco Inc 970.68 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.12/26/2019 101-1370-4170 CYLINDERS 152.46 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 152.46 McMaster-Carr 12/17/2019 700-0000-4150 Parts 18.72 McMaster-Carr 12/17/2019 700-0000-4150 Parts 14.65 McMaster-Carr 12/17/2019 700-0000-4150 Pipe 81.75 McMaster-Carr 115.12 Menards 11/18/2019 701-0000-4510 Water Softener 536.55 Menards 11/18/2019 101-1560-4130 Project Supplies -31.80 Menards 11/18/2019 101-1560-4120 MAPLE CORNER REMODEL - PAINT 18.80 Menards 11/18/2019 101-1560-4120 MAPLE CORNER SINK TILES 11.68 Menards 11/18/2019 101-1560-4120 MAPLE CORNER EQUIP SUPPLIES 5.67 Menards 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 716.34 Menards 12/17/2019 420-0000-4751 Loop Ties 130.03 Menards 12/17/2019 420-0000-4751 Concrete Blanket 177.36 Menards 1,564.63 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1320-4150 SUPPLIES 13.65 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1550-4120 SUPPLIES 126.38 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1550-4150 SUPPLIES 195.88 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 605-6501-4300 SUPPLIES 34.19 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1310-4120 SUPPLIES 3.59 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 700-0000-4150 SUPPLIES 16.88 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 700-0000-4550 SUPPLIES 11.69 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1160-4150 SUPPLIES 27.67 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1220-4120 SUPPLIES 61.16 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1220-4140 SUPPLIES 89.92 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1220-4290 SUPPLIES 136.86 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1250-4120 SUPPLIES 21.59 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 101-1320-4120 SUPPLIES 60.18 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 12/12/2019 701-0000-4240 GLOVES 15.99 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 815.63 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 12/19/2019 101-1250-3816 SAC -49.70 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 12/19/2019 701-0000-2023 SAC 4,970.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 4,920.30 Michaels 11/18/2019 101-1560-4120 MAPLE CORNER OPEN HOUSE 43.83 Michaels 43.83 Militarynames.com 12/17/2019 700-0000-4240 Lettering 4.75 Militarynames.com 12/17/2019 701-0000-4240 Lettering 4.75 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 12 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Militarynames.com 9.50 MINGER CONSTRUCTION 12/12/2019 720-0000-4701 DEMOLITION 19,350.00 MINGER CONSTRUCTION 12/12/2019 720-7025-4752 LAKE LUCY DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS 3,231.80 MINGER CONSTRUCTION 12/19/2019 720-7025-4751 Chanhassen Carver Beach Area - Improvements 30,522.55 MINGER CONSTRUCTION 53,104.35 Minn Fire Svc Cert Board 12/17/2019 101-1220-4300 MFSCB Bulk Recertification 500.00 Minn Fire Svc Cert Board 12/17/2019 101-1220-4300 MFSCB Bulk Recertification -50.00 Minn Fire Svc Cert Board 450.00 Minnesota Rural Water Association 11/18/2019 700-0000-4370 Minnesota Rural Water School 125.00 Minnesota Rural Water Association 125.00 MN American Water Works Association 11/18/2019 700-0000-4370 Minnesota AWWA Central Section Water School 45.00 MN American Water Works Association 11/18/2019 700-0000-4370 Minnesota AWWA Central Section Water School 30.00 MN American Water Works Association 75.00 MN Association of Government Communicators 11/18/2019 101-1120-4370 CONFERENCE CANCELLATION -160.00 MN Association of Government Communicators -160.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 12/12/2019 101-1250-3818 permits -57.68 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 12/12/2019 101-0000-2022 permits 2,884.01 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 12/19/2019 101-1370-4300 Pressure Vessel, Boiler 50.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 2,876.33 MN Pollution Control Agency 12/17/2019 701-0000-4370 training certification 390.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 12/17/2019 701-0000-4370 training certification 55.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 445.00 MN Society of Arboriculture 12/17/2019 720-7202-4370 Continuing Education 130.00 MN Society of Arboriculture 130.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 2151 LYMAN BLVD 83.60 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 96TH ST & ST HWY 101 LIGHTS 41.93 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 BLUFF CRK & AUDUBON RD 28.49 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 BLUFF CRK BLVD LIGHTS 219.55 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 BANDIMERE PARK LIGHTS 156.26 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 KIOWA TRL & HWY 101 LIGHTS 30.23 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/12/2019 101-1350-4320 HWY 101 / PIONER TRL SIGNL 5,171.35 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/12/2019 101-1600-4320 HWY 101 / PIONER TRL SIGNL 31.51 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/12/2019 700-0000-4320 HWY 101 / PIONER TRL SIGNL 451.31 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/12/2019 701-0000-4320 HWY 101 / PIONER TRL SIGNL 508.03 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/12/2019 601-0000-4706 HWY 101 / PIONER TRL SIGNL 20,993.62 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/12/2019 605-0000-4300 HWY 101 / PIONER TRL SIGNL 32.61 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 12/19/2019 101-1350-4320 County Rd 61 & St Hwy 101 Lights 260.09 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/02/2020 101-1350-4320 Bluff Crk & Flying Cloud Dr 146.41 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 13 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/02/2020 101-1350-4320 Bandimere Park Lights 174.35 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/02/2020 101-1350-4320 Kiowa Trl & ST Hwy 101 Lights 32.06 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 28,361.40 Mobile Mini, Inc 12/26/2019 101-1617-4410 WARMING HOUSES 901.96 Mobile Mini, Inc 12/26/2019 101-1617-4410 WARMING HOUSES 901.96 Mobile Mini, Inc 12/26/2019 101-1617-4410 WARMING HOUSES 901.96 Mobile Mini, Inc 2,705.88 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 12/19/2019 101-1160-4300 ANNUAL MUNICODE ADMIN FEE 350.00 MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION 350.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 12/12/2019 101-1550-4120 VEHICLE SUPPLIES 40.40 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 12/26/2019 101-1550-4120 SUPPLIES 191.74 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 12/26/2019 101-1370-4260 TOOL 480.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/02/2020 700-0000-4120 Parts 7.40 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/02/2020 700-0000-4120 Parts 2.33 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 721.87 Navico 12/17/2019 720-0000-4130 Membership for Ryan P 825.00 Navico 825.00 NEOGOV 11/18/2019 101-1120-4300 Job Posting 125.00 NEOGOV 11/18/2019 101-1120-4300 Job Posting 119.00 NEOGOV 244.00 Next Day Automation 11/18/2019 700-0000-4530 Eaton Cutler Hammer 184.10 Next Day Automation 11/18/2019 700-0000-4530 Eaton Cutler Hammer 13.85 Next Day Automation 197.95 NORTH COOP 11/18/2019 101-1120-4370 INTERVIEW 85.00 NORTH COOP 85.00 Northern Tool+Equipment 11/18/2019 101-1550-4120 Supplies 226.73 Northern Tool+Equipment 226.73 NoveltyLights.com 12/17/2019 101-1550-4120 Christmas Lights - tax return -190.01 NoveltyLights.com 12/17/2019 101-1550-4120 Christmas Lights 2,766.43 NoveltyLights.com 2,576.42 Nuss Truck & Equipment 12/26/2019 101-1320-4140 PARTS 87.06 Nuss Truck & Equipment 87.06 Office Max/Office Depot 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 Marker - Expo 10.67 Office Max/Office Depot 12/17/2019 700-0000-4150 USB 19.21 Office Max/Office Depot 11/18/2019 101-1160-4150 Maintenance/cables 85.48 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 14 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Office Max/Office Depot 11/18/2019 101-1170-4110 Office/Toner 101.51 Office Max/Office Depot 12/17/2019 101-1160-4150 Maintenance Materials 30.96 Office Max/Office Depot 247.83 Olson Annika 12/26/2019 101-1538-4300 SAFE KIDS TRAINING INSTRUCTION 300.00 Olson Annika 300.00 OPG-3, Inc 01/02/2020 400-4124-4703 Laserfiche Full Client License 2,514.98 OPG-3, Inc 01/02/2020 400-4124-4703 Finance Scanner Replacements 1,850.00 OPG-3, Inc 4,364.98 Orange Coast Pneumatics 12/17/2019 700-7043-4150 Parts 380.16 Orange Coast Pneumatics 380.16 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 12/12/2019 101-1320-4140 Auto Parts 24.49 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 12/12/2019 101-1420-4140 Auto Parts 10.28 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 12/12/2019 701-0000-4520 Auto Parts 15.05 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 49.82 OTC Brands Inc 12/17/2019 101-1614-4130 Halloween Party 42.99 OTC Brands Inc 42.99 Party City 11/18/2019 101-1560-4130 Tea Party 11.80 Party City 11/18/2019 101-1565-4130 SUPPLIES MEMORY CAFE 47.70 Party City 11/18/2019 101-1614-4130 HALLOWEEN PARTY 190.54 Party City 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 261.11 Party City 12/17/2019 101-1614-4130 Foil Spray 26.70 Party City 537.85 PC World Magazine 12/17/2019 101-1160-4210 Books and Periodicals 19.97 PC World Magazine 19.97 Pedretti Christine Lea 01/02/2020 101-1539-4300 Yoga 828.10 Pedretti Christine Lea 828.10 Peg Leg Porker 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 Lunch 19.92 Peg Leg Porker 19.92 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.12/12/2019 601-6044-4751 PROJECT 119130 BLUFF CREEK TRAIL REHAB 1,545.00 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 1,545.00 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO.01/02/2020 101-1320-4140 Parts 163.51 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 163.51 Pizza Ranch 11/18/2019 101-1560-4300 Iowa Trip lunch 302.78 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 15 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Pizza Ranch 302.78 Pizzaioli 11/18/2019 101-1220-4370 TRAINING 231.81 Pizzaioli 11/18/2019 101-1220-4370 TRAINING 143.32 Pizzaioli 375.13 Postmaster 12/17/2019 101-1310-4120 Shipping 9.45 Postmaster 12/17/2019 101-1220-4330 Shipping 11.59 Postmaster 21.04 Potbelly Sandwich Shop 11/18/2019 101-1110-4370 Council Dinner 8.14 Potbelly Sandwich Shop 11/18/2019 101-1110-4370 Council Dinner 129.16 Potbelly Sandwich Shop 137.30 Potentia MN Solar 12/05/2019 700-0000-4320 2019-10-01 TO 2019-10-31 1,537.00 Potentia MN Solar 12/05/2019 101-1190-4320 2019-10-01 TO 2019-10-31 2,868.45 Potentia MN Solar 12/05/2019 101-1170-4320 2019-10-01 TO 2019-10-31 2,206.85 Potentia MN Solar 6,612.30 Premium Waters, Inc 12/19/2019 101-1550-4120 Bottled Water 12.30 Premium Waters, Inc 12.30 PRO TURF 12/19/2019 101-1550-4300 Summer Lawn Application 1,166.00 PRO TURF 1,166.00 Pro-Tec Design, Inc.12/12/2019 101-1160-4530 REPLACEMENT DOOR STRIKE 364.17 Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 364.17 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 11/18/2019 601-6032-4751 Tree Removal 1,950.00 Pro-Tree Outdoor Services 1,950.00 Quality Flow Systems Inc 12/26/2019 701-0000-4530 PARTS 250.00 Quality Flow Systems Inc 250.00 RBM SERVICES INC 12/19/2019 101-1170-4300 Janitorial 3,583.37 RBM SERVICES INC 12/19/2019 101-1190-4300 Janitorial 3,471.10 RBM SERVICES INC 7,054.47 RCT WEEDLEY 11/18/2019 101-1160-4530 Repair and maintenance 29.99 RCT WEEDLEY 29.99 Red Wing Store 12/17/2019 700-0000-4240 boots 139.99 Red Wing Store 139.99 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 16 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Rotary Club 11/18/2019 101-1520-4360 Rotary Dues 53.00 Rotary Club 12/17/2019 101-1520-4360 Rotary 53.00 Rotary Club 106.00 Sam's Club 11/18/2019 101-1565-4130 Maple Corner Open House 110.55 Sam's Club 12/17/2019 101-1560-4130 Oktoberfest Party 69.54 Sam's Club 12/17/2019 101-1560-4130 Holiday Party Supplies 116.50 Sam's Club 12/17/2019 101-1560-4130 Supplies 29.81 Sam's Club 326.40 Savage Jump Inflatables 11/18/2019 101-1220-4375 OPEN HOUSE 170.46 Savage Jump Inflatables 170.46 Sensible Land Use Coalition 11/18/2019 101-1420-4370 Wisdom Panel Member Luncheon 48.00 Sensible Land Use Coalition 48.00 Seton Indentification Products 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 Pipe Markers 18.25 Seton Indentification Products 18.25 ShareFile 11/18/2019 101-1160-4300 Fees for Services 565.33 ShareFile 565.33 Sherwin-Williams 12/17/2019 701-0000-4150 Paint 109.55 Sherwin-Williams 109.55 Shorewood True Value 12/17/2019 601-6038-4290 Supplies - 18-01 15.54 Shorewood True Value 12/17/2019 601-6038-4290 Supplies - 18-01 8.49 Shorewood True Value 24.03 Software House International 11/18/2019 101-1160-4220 Software Licenses Hardware License and Support Renewals 118.70 Software House International 118.70 Southwest Newspapers 11/18/2019 101-1520-4360 Chanhassen Villager 40.00 Southwest Newspapers 40.00 Speedway 11/18/2019 700-0000-4170 Fuel 16.22 Speedway 16.22 SPRINT PCS 12/19/2019 701-0000-4310 Cell Phone 51.72 SPRINT PCS 12/19/2019 700-0000-4310 Cell Phone 51.72 SPRINT PCS 103.44 SPS COMPANIES INC 12/05/2019 101-1370-4150 SPARE PARTS 179.96 SPS COMPANIES INC 12/12/2019 101-1170-4510 PART FOR WOMENS RESTROOM 20.05 SPS COMPANIES INC 12/19/2019 101-1190-4530 Valve for Boiler 56.71 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 17 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount SPS COMPANIES INC 256.72 Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 12/26/2019 700-0000-4140 PARTS 932.88 Standard Spring-Truck Suspension Parts 932.88 Stavros Properties 12/12/2019 101-1171-4320 Q2 AND Q3 EASEMENT FEES - 7805 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 414.92 Stavros Properties 414.92 Story City GCC 11/18/2019 101-1560-4300 Tour - Iowa Overnight Trip 85.00 Story City GCC 85.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 12/19/2019 101-1160-4300 PROOFPOINT EMAIL FILTERING SRVC - JAN 176.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 176.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 12/12/2019 101-1250-4140 Parts 68.89 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/02/2020 101-1220-4140 parts 132.49 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/02/2020 101-1320-4120 parts 44.81 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 246.19 SUMMIT COMPANIES 12/05/2019 700-7043-4530 ANNUAL SPRINKLER INSPECTION 600.00 SUMMIT COMPANIES 600.00 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-0000-2011 COBRA -82.37 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1120-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 32.56 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1130-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 21.30 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1160-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 11.21 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1250-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 38.79 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1310-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 30.28 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1320-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 48.25 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1370-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 19.10 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1520-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 13.50 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1530-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 6.21 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1560-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 5.13 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1600-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 14.99 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1700-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 1.67 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1550-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 39.70 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1420-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 34.58 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1430-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 2.05 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 210-0000-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 7.65 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 720-7201-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 2.43 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 720-7202-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 2.43 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1170-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 3.51 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-1220-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 18.72 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 701-0000-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 31.77 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 700-0000-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 41.14 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 720-0000-4040 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 9.57 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 101-0000-2011 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 781.92 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 210-0000-2011 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 6.29 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 700-0000-2011 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 109.52 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 18 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 701-0000-2011 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 109.52 Sun Life Financial 12/12/2019 720-0000-2011 BASIC LIFE - ACTIVE 9.00 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1120-4040 Life Insurance - January 35.85 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1130-4040 Life Insurance - January 23.23 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1160-4040 Life Insurance - January 12.53 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1250-4040 Life Insurance - January 50.32 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1310-4040 Life Insurance - January 45.03 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1320-4040 Life Insurance - January 51.89 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1370-4040 Life Insurance - January 20.83 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1520-4040 Life Insurance - January 14.50 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1530-4040 Life Insurance - January 6.82 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1560-4040 Life Insurance - January 5.76 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1600-4040 Life Insurance - January 11.93 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1700-4040 Life Insurance - January 1.33 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1550-4040 Life Insurance - January 42.84 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1420-4040 Life Insurance - January 38.22 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1430-4040 Life Insurance - January 2.28 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 210-0000-4040 Life Insurance - January 8.48 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 720-7201-4040 Life Insurance - January 2.69 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 720-7202-4040 Life Insurance - January 2.69 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1170-4040 Life Insurance - January 3.81 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-1220-4040 Life Insurance - January 20.45 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 701-0000-4040 Life Insurance - January 35.79 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 700-0000-4040 Life Insurance - January 47.16 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 720-0000-4040 Life Insurance - January 11.23 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-0000-2011 Life Insurance - January 675.88 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 210-0000-2011 Life Insurance - January 6.29 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 700-0000-2011 Life Insurance - January 125.56 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 701-0000-2011 Life Insurance - January 125.56 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 720-0000-2011 Life Insurance - January 9.31 Sun Life Financial 01/02/2020 101-0000-2011 Life Insurance - Cobra - January 6.46 Sun Life Financial 2,815.14 Target 12/17/2019 101-1560-4120 Kitchen Equipment 21.49 Target 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 Peroxide 11.40 Target 11/18/2019 700-0000-4240 clothing 14.99 Target 11/18/2019 700-0000-4150 cleaning supplies 16.90 Target 12/17/2019 101-1560-4120 Kitchen Equipment 40.81 Target 12/17/2019 101-1530-4130 Pickleball Buckets 10.68 Target 12/17/2019 101-1614-4130 Return - Candy Bars -135.20 Target 12/17/2019 101-1614-4130 Candy 512.68 Target 12/17/2019 101-1530-4120 Fridge & Coffee Pot 136.71 Target 12/17/2019 101-1220-4290 Fire Prevention 21.38 Target 11/18/2019 701-0000-4240 clothing 14.99 Target 666.83 Tavern 4&5 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 PW Dir Candidate from Hopkins 42.00 Tavern 4&5 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 PW Dir Candidate 31.00 Tavern 4&5 73.00 TBEI, Inc 12/12/2019 101-1320-4120 VALVE 153.12 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 19 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount TBEI, Inc 153.12 TCIC, Inc.12/05/2019 701-0000-4530 PARTS 93.00 TCIC, Inc. 93.00 Tenntaxi Nashville 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 Taxi - Airport to Hotel 31.20 Tenntaxi Nashville 31.20 Tessco 11/18/2019 701-0000-4551 Parts 481.51 Tessco 481.51 THE FIRE STORE.COM 11/18/2019 101-1220-4260 IRONS 47.98 THE FIRE STORE.COM 47.98 The Southern 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 dinner 52.00 The Southern 52.00 TouchPoint Logic LLC 01/02/2020 210-0000-4300 Repair/ Upgrade PW AV System 4,185.00 TouchPoint Logic LLC 4,185.00 TRADER JOE'S 11/18/2019 101-1565-4130 MAPLE CORNER OPEN HOUSE 51.52 TRADER JOE'S 51.52 U of M Contlearning 12/17/2019 101-1310-4370 CEAM Annual Membership and Conference 375.00 U of M Contlearning 12/17/2019 700-0000-4370 CEAM Annual Membership and Conference 315.00 U of M Contlearning 690.00 United Farmers Cooperative 12/05/2019 101-1320-4240 SAFETY GEAR FOR AARON 129.99 United Farmers Cooperative 129.99 UNITED WAY 12/05/2019 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00406.12.2019 United Way 29.40 UNITED WAY 12/19/2019 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00420.12.2019 United Way 29.40 UNITED WAY 01/02/2020 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00403.01.2020 United Way 30.40 UNITED WAY 89.20 University of Minnesota 11/18/2019 101-1310-4370 APWA Member 255.00 University of Minnesota 11/18/2019 700-0000-4370 APWA Member 255.00 University of Minnesota 510.00 USA BLUE BOOK 12/05/2019 101-1320-4120 MANHOLE COVER LIFTER 152.17 USA BLUE BOOK 12/05/2019 700-0000-4530 TABLETS 1,415.52 USA BLUE BOOK 12/12/2019 700-0000-4550 "NOT IN SERVICE" BAGS 250.80 USA BLUE BOOK 12/12/2019 700-0000-4260 VALVE BOXES 228.48 USA BLUE BOOK 12/26/2019 700-0000-4150 SUPPLIES 250.80 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 20 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount USA BLUE BOOK 2,297.77 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1550-4310 CELL PHONE 457.76 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1520-4310 CELL PHONE 42.87 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1600-4310 CELL PHONE 128.27 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1530-4310 CELL PHONE 42.87 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 700-0000-4310 CELL PHONE 572.68 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 701-0000-4310 CELL PHONE 419.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 720-0000-4310 CELL PHONE 108.27 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1160-4310 CELL PHONE 90.74 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1120-4310 CELL PHONE 260.79 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1170-4310 CELL PHONE 25.39 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1260-4310 CELL PHONE 35.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1130-4310 CELL PHONE 71.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1250-4310 CELL PHONE 290.79 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1310-4310 CELL PHONE 158.17 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1370-4310 CELL PHONE 93.65 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1320-4310 CELL PHONE 322.72 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1220-4310 CELL PHONE 505.86 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-0000-2033 CELL PHONE 11.53 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/05/2019 101-1220-4310 CELL PHONE 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/02/2020 101-1220-4310 Cell Phones 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 3,718.69 VIBRANT TECHNOLOGIES 12/17/2019 400-4126-4703 Computer and Network Purchases 450.00 VIBRANT TECHNOLOGIES 12/17/2019 101-1160-4530 Repair and Maintenance Expenses 105.00 VIBRANT TECHNOLOGIES 555.00 Viking Electric Supply 11/18/2019 701-0000-4551 Female Adapter 1.96 Viking Electric Supply 11/18/2019 701-0000-4551 6 STR GRN MR 61.72 Viking Electric Supply 63.68 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc.12/12/2019 101-1320-4410 RENTAL LIGHTS 352.00 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 352.00 WeatherTech 12/17/2019 101-1320-4140 Vehicle Supplies 75.06 WeatherTech 12/17/2019 700-0000-4520 Vehicle Supplies 83.70 WeatherTech 158.76 WEISSMAN 12/17/2019 101-1535-4130 Dance Costumes 4,732.85 WEISSMAN 4,732.85 Wendy's 12/17/2019 101-1120-4370 breakfast 7.53 Wendy's 7.53 Windy City Noveltie 12/17/2019 101-1614-4130 Halloween Party 72.60 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 21 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount Windy City Noveltie 72.60 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 01/02/2020 701-0000-4551 Carver CY 112.00 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 01/02/2020 701-0000-4551 Carver CY 280.00 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 392.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 101-1160-4300 DATALINK ANNUAL MAINTENCE FEE 1,250.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/19/2019 720-0000-4300 DATALINK ANNUAL MAINTENCE FEE 1,250.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 206.70 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 420-0000-4300 2019 PAVEMENT MANAGMENT TRAIL 962.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 DATALINK MAINTENANCE 1,250.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 GIS SUPPORT SERVICES 5,742.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 DATAFI SUBSCRIPTION 1,140.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 420-0000-4300 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT - ROADS 6,823.78 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 CARVER COUNTY TH5 REGIONAL TRAIL 721.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 101-1310-4300 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 4,598.71 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 605-6501-4300 WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATIONS 1,041.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 601-6045-4752 LGU POWERS BLVD AND LAKE LUCY RD IMPROVE 486.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 LGU HCRRA MINNESOTA RIVER BLUFFS LRT DEL 708.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 601-6039-4752 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1,229.88 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 601-6038-4752 CONSTRUCTION 3,066.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 700-0000-4300 2019 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS MODELING 1,588.25 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 601-6038-4752 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1,044.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 101-1310-4300 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 1,676.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 700-0000-4300 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 1,047.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 701-0000-4300 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 1,047.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 601-6039-4752 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN/MEETINGS 6,220.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 LGU HCRRA MN RIVER BLUFFS LRT DEL 111.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 101-1310-4300 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 7,920.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 700-0000-4300 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1,056.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 701-0000-4300 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1,056.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 528.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 419.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 101-1310-4300 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 826.80 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 700-0000-4300 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 516.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 701-0000-4300 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 516.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 605-6501-4300 PERMITTING 222.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 195 79TH ST WEST WCA LGU 509.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 101-1160-4300 DATALINK MAINTENANCE 1,250.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 700-0000-4300 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 613.16 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 701-0000-4300 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 613.16 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 12/26/2019 720-0000-4300 INTERIM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 306.58 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 59,563.52 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 ACCT # 51-9815694-4 28.82 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1600-4320 ACCOUNT # 51-6285959-6 22.09 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 700-0000-4320 ACCOUNT # 51-0010754175-0 -119.40 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1540-4320 ACCT # 51-6285960-9 -271.60 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1600-4320 ACCT # 51-6285960-9 -14.34 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1550-4320 ACCT # 51-6285960-9 -143.20 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1350-4320 ACCT # 51-5195542-1 15,096.69 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1170-4320 ACCT # 51-5636006-8 -804.19 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 22 of 23 Name Check D Account Description Amount XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1190-4320 ACCT # 51-5636006-8 -750.88 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1220-4320 ACCT # 51-5636006-8 635.82 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1370-4320 ACCT # 51-5636006-8 1,409.47 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 101-1171-4320 ACCT # 51-5636006-8 5.18 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 700-0000-4320 ACCT # 51-5636006-8 176.18 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/05/2019 701-0000-4320 ACCT # 51-5636006-8 176.19 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 101-1350-4320 Pedestrian Flashers - 6412 Chan rd 10.82 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 101-1350-4320 Pedestrian Flashers - 6328 Hazeltine Rd 10.72 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 101-1350-4320 City of Chanhassen - 1532 Lyman Blvd 12.60 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 101-1350-4320 Signal Lights - 9000 Audubon Rd 27.69 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 700-7043-4320 City of Chanhassen - 6910 Galpin Blvd 3,937.95 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 700-0000-4320 Water Tower 47.58 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 101-1600-4320 7599 Minneswashta Pkwy 12.07 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/19/2019 700-0000-4320 1720 Lake Lucy Rd 978.73 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/26/2019 700-0000-4320 WELLS 5,629.80 XCEL ENERGY INC 12/26/2019 700-7019-4320 EAST WATER TREATMENT PLANT 2,169.12 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1350-4320 Signal/Lights 19,763.72 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1600-4320 Park Lights 131.65 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1540-4320 Parks 289.21 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1600-4320 Parks 42.75 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1550-4320 Parks 159.08 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 701-0000-4320 Lift Stations 3,328.14 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 701-0000-4320 Lift Stations -898.47 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1600-4320 City Hall 11.60 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1350-4320 Streetlights 130.43 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1350-4320 trail lights 46.53 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1170-4320 Fire stations, Library 1,120.38 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1190-4320 Fire stations, Library 1,230.60 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1220-4320 Fire stations, Library 892.91 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1370-4320 Fire stations, Library 1,839.14 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 101-1170-4320 Fire stations, Library 18.13 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 700-0000-4320 Fire stations, Library 229.89 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/02/2020 701-0000-4320 Fire stations, Library 229.89 XCEL ENERGY INC 56,849.49 ZIEGLER INC 01/02/2020 700-0000-4530 Parts 205.05 ZIEGLER INC 205.05 Zinio 12/17/2019 101-1160-4210 Books and Periodicals 19.99 Zinio 19.99 679,337.27 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/04/2020 - 1:58 PM)Page 23 of 23