Loading...
Agenda and PacketAGENDA  CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2019, 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.CALL TO ORDER B.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Remove Standard Specification and Detail Plate Requirement for Permeable Paver Systems 2.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Clarify Language Governing Recreational Beach Lots 3.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Require Traffic Studies as Part of Site Plan Reviews 4.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Zoning Standards for Solar Energy Systems 5.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Correct a Typographical Error in the Interim Uses Statute 6.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Restrict Merchandise Sold at Temporary and Special Events to Goods Normally Sold On Site 7.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Minimum Driveway Configuration Standards 8.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Require Single­Family Homes to Have Walkways and Concrete Pads for Stairs and Landings 9.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Airport Zoning Standards 10.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Ban the Keeping of Birds of Prey 11.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Remove Obsolete Parking Lot Configuration Graphic C.APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Approve Planning Commission Minutes dated October 15, 2019 D.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1.City Council Action Update AGENDA CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSIONTUESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2019, 7:00 PMCITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.CALL TO ORDERB.PUBLIC HEARINGS1.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Remove Standard Specification and DetailPlate Requirement for Permeable Paver Systems2.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Clarify Language Governing RecreationalBeach Lots3.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Require Traffic Studies as Part of Site PlanReviews4.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Zoning Standards for Solar EnergySystems5.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Correct a Typographical Error in theInterim Uses Statute6.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Restrict Merchandise Sold at Temporaryand Special Events to Goods Normally Sold On Site7.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Minimum Driveway ConfigurationStandards8.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Require Single­Family Homes to HaveWalkways and Concrete Pads for Stairs and Landings9.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Airport Zoning Standards10.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Ban the Keeping of Birds of Prey11.Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Remove Obsolete Parking LotConfiguration GraphicC.APPROVAL OF MINUTES1.Approve Planning Commission Minutes dated October 15, 2019D.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1.City Council Action Update E.ADJOURNMENT F.OPEN DISCUSSION NOTE: Planning Commission meetings are scheduled to end by 10:30 p.m. as outlined in the official by­laws.  We will make every attempt to complete the hearing for each item on the agenda.  If, however, this does not appear to be possible, the Chairperson will notify those present and offer rescheduling options.  Items thus pulled from consideration will be listed first on the agenda at the next Commission meeting. If a constituent or resident sends an email to staff or the Planning Commission, it must be made part of the public record based on State Statute. If a constituent or resident sends an email to the Mayor and City Council, it is up to each individual City Council member and Mayor if they want it to be made part of the public record or not. There is no State Statute that forces the Mayor or City Council to share that information with the public or be made part of the public record. Under State Statute, staff cannot remove comments or letters provided as part of the public input process. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Remove Standard Specification and Detail Plate Requirement for Permeable Paver Systems Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.1. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning pervious pavement system design standards. SUMMARY OF REQUEST City Ordinance prescribes the use of the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates for the design of pervious pavement systems. To date, the adoption of detail plates and standard specifications for pervious pavement systems into City Standards has not occurred. As ICPI has already established and continually maintains and updates industry standards and detail plates for pervious pavement systems, staff believes it would be prudent to utilize ICPI’s resources. This is similar to how the city utilizes MnDOT Specifications for construction projects or Ten State Standards for water and sewer specifications. A full analysis can found in the attached staff report. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Sec. 20­921. – Pervious Pavement. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Code be amended to remove the need to conform to City Standards as a design criteria for pervious pavement systems. ATTACHMENTS: Pervious Pavement Design Standards Issue Paper CITY OT CIIANHASSTN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and planning for Tomorrow TO FROM: DATE: Planning Commission Erik Henricksen, Project Engineer November 19,2019 SUBJ: Pervious Pavement Systems - Design Standards SUMMARY: City Ordinance prescribes the use ofthe City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates for the design of pervious pavement systems. To date, the adoption of detail plates and standard specifications for pervious pavement systems into City Standards has not occurred. One reason for this is that the intent and use of City Standards is to create universal design criteria for the implementation and construction of public works projects. In addition, these standards are typically utilized for the build-out of infrastructure intended for the city to own and maintain, or private projects that have an impact on public rights-of-way. As pervious pavement systems are not an adopted practice for public projects. it was never necessary to have such City Standards. Along with requiring that designs meet City Standards, City Ordinance also requires pervious pavement systems be designed to the lnterlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI) standards, which houses over 60 details and multiple specifications for pervious pavement systems. In conjunction with these resources, ICPI also supplies information on finding certified installers, distributors, manufactures, suppliers; a database oftechnical papers on pervious pavement systems; other technical resources such as construction tolerances and recommendations; and technical specifi cation guidelines designed for govemment agencies. r/OO MARKET BOUTEVARO . PO BOX I47 .CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 553]7 MEMORANDTJM ISSUE: City Ordinance requires engineered pervious pavement systems to be designed in accordance with the current version of the City of Chanhassen Standard Specifications and Detail Plates (City Standards). Currently, the city has no set standards. Furthermore, there are many different types of pervious pavement systems. For example, there are pervious pavements, porous pavemenls, pervious pavers, plastic/concrete grids, and amended soils, just to name a few. Because of the plethora of systems, it would take considerable resources for staff to keep City Standards up to date with best practices for every type. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 Planning Commission Pervious Pavement Systems - Design Standards November 19,2019 Page 2 Given the above difficulties and the fact that the ICPI maintains an extensive catalog ofpervious pavement designs, which are already referenced by City Ordinance, staff proposes removing the Ordinance's reference to City Standards. This will eliminate the need for the city to develop and maintain a redundant set of standards. Pervious pavement systems are suitable for a wide variety of private residential, commercial and industrial applications. However, these systems require both proper installation and continual maintenance to function properly. Staff addressed maintenance concems by requiring owners enter into a maintenance agreement with the City, and addressed proper installation by requiring they meet both City Standards and ICPI design standards. As staff worked to develop City Standards for pervious pavement systems, it was determined that adopting independent City Standards would be an unnecessary duplication ofthe work already done by ICPI. In addition, City Sundards are generally reserved for the engineered specifications and details for publicly owned infrastructure, thus, staff believes that it would be onerous to continually update and track best practices and standards for private systems. Additionally, when it was investigated to augment staff time by having a consultant develop these standards, it became clear that developing and maintaining appropriate standards for the various types of pervious pavement systems would be cost prohibitive. An initial quote for producing one detail plate specific to pervious pavers was $5,000.00. As ICPI has already established and continually maintains and updates industry standards and detail plates for pervious pavement systems, staffbelieves it would be prudent to utilize ICPI's resources. This is similar to how the city utilizes MnDOT Specifications for construction projects or Ten State Standards for water and sewer specifications. Staff recommends Altemative 2. Staff believes that rather than having two design standards for pervious pavement systems (one by ICPI and one by the city), it would be more reasonable to have only one. 2 R.ELEVANT CITY CODE: Sec. 20-921. - Pervious Pavement. ANALYSIS: ALTERNATIVES: l) Do nothing. Leave City Code as is and update City Standards to include specifications and detail plates for pervious pavement systems. 2) Amend the City Code to eliminate the need to have City Standards as design criteria for pervious pavement systems. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission Pervious Pavement Systems - Design Standards November 19,2019 Page 3 The proposed amended pervious pavement ordinance would read as follows: Sec. 20-921. - Pervious pavement. Properly designed, installed, and maintained pervious pavements have the capacity to allow for stormwater detention and/or infiltration. When not properly designed, installed, and maintained pervious pavements fail to facilitate the detention and/or infiltration of stormwater. Additionally, pervious pavements contribute to the creation ofheat islands and do not provide the same surface water management benefrts as native vegetative cover. For these reasons, it is necessary to regulate the lot coverage, desigrr, installation, and maintenance of these systems. (l) Lot coverage.' Pervious pavements are considered to constitute lot coverage; however, when built to the standards espoused in this section they do not constitute impervious surfaces. Systems not built to the standards espoused in this section are considered to constitute impervious surfaces. (2) Localion restricl ions : a. Pervious pavements may not be installed in areas where trash or garbage receptacles will be stored. (3) Design and installarion: a. A building permit is required for the instillation ofpervious pavement systems. b. Pervious pavement systems must be designed to provide for rate and volume control for the first half-inch oftreatment area @ Treatment area includes the total square footage ofthe pervious pavement system plus the total square footage of impervious surface draining directly to the pervious pavement system. c. To meet the city's definition of pervious pavement, the system must: 1) be designed in compliance with standards established by the Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI); 2) be installed by an ICPI certified installer; and 3) be designed to meet or exceed the standards listed in paragraph (3)b. d. The city engineer may permit pervious pavement technologies other than permeable interlocking concrete pavers, so long as the city engineer determines: I ) they are fimctionally equivalent or better; 2) the system is desigred in compliance with accepted guidelines and is installed by an appropriately certified installer; and 3) the system will meet or exceed the standards listed in paragraph (3)b. (4) Maintenance: a. The owner ofa pervious paver system must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city to ensure the system performs as designed in perpetuity. This agreement must conform to the manufactures guidelines, and stipulate the frequency and type of maintenance to be performed, 3 Planning Commission Pervious Pavement Systems - Design Standards November 19,2019 Page 4 (5) District restrictions: a. Planned Unit Developments Residential Districts (PUDR) are limited to the lot coverage specified by their ordinance and/or compliance table. For PUDRs created before June 1 1 , 201 8, the terms hardcover, hard surface, impervious surface, and similar phrases, shall be understood to mean lot cover inclusive ofboth pervious pavements and impervious surfaces, and in no circumstance shall the failure of the ordinance or compliance table to mention pervious pavements be understood to mean that pervious pavements are not subject to the lot cover, hardcover, hardscape, or similarly identified limits that govem the PUDR. b. Shoreland Management District restricts properties zoned Single-Family Residential District (RSF) to 25 percent lot coverage. c:\PLAl.I\City Code\20l9\20 | 9{5 vario$s\Pervious Pavement (Dcsign Stsndards[Pervious Pavernent Issue Paper.docx 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Clarify Language Governing Recreational Beach Lots Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning Recreational Beachlots. SUMMARY OF REQUEST Several sections of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) standards for recreational beach lots, particularly the section governing overnight storage and mooring, are poorly structured. In its current state, it is difficult to read and hard to determine what provisions apply and in what circumstances they apply. The city frequently receives calls from HOAs interested in amending their CUP or clarifying their understanding of what is and is not permitted, and the confusing structure of this section of the Code can sometimes exacerbate rather than resolve their confusion. This section also contains an out­of­date reference that should be updated to continually reference the most recently adopted comprehensive plan. Finally, this section outlines a policy allowing adjacent lots under a common ownership to consolidate their docks that is confusing and unnecessary. Staff proposes to rewrite sections of the code to clarify the intent of the portions that routinely cause confusion. The substance and nature of the provisions governing recreational beach lots should not be changed other than updating the out­of­date reference and removing unnecessary provisions, but phrasing and organization should be reworked in the hopes of creating a more user­friendly section. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Sec. 1­2. – Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the term “Recreational beach lot”. Sec. 20­266. – Recreational beach lots. Details the intent of and standards for recreational beach lots. BACKGROUND Amendment History Ordinance 80, passed in 1986, established the framework of our existing zoning code and lists recreational beach lots PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Clarify Language Governing Recreational Beach LotsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment toChapter 20 concerning Recreational Beachlots.SUMMARY OF REQUESTSeveral sections of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) standards for recreational beach lots, particularly the sectiongoverning overnight storage and mooring, are poorly structured. In its current state, it is difficult to read and hard todetermine what provisions apply and in what circumstances they apply. The city frequently receives calls from HOAsinterested in amending their CUP or clarifying their understanding of what is and is not permitted, and the confusingstructure of this section of the Code can sometimes exacerbate rather than resolve their confusion. This section alsocontains an out­of­date reference that should be updated to continually reference the most recently adoptedcomprehensive plan. Finally, this section outlines a policy allowing adjacent lots under a common ownership toconsolidate their docks that is confusing and unnecessary.Staff proposes to rewrite sections of the code to clarify the intent of the portions that routinely cause confusion. Thesubstance and nature of the provisions governing recreational beach lots should not be changed other than updating theout­of­date reference and removing unnecessary provisions, but phrasing and organization should be reworked in thehopes of creating a more user­friendly section.APPLICATION REGULATIONSSec. 1­2. – Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the term “Recreational beach lot”.Sec. 20­266. – Recreational beach lots. Details the intent of and standards for recreational beach lots.BACKGROUNDAmendment History Ordinance 80, passed in 1986, established the framework of our existing zoning code and lists recreational beach lots as a conditional use within residential districts. No standards, other than those generally governing conditional uses, were put in place, nor was the term recreational beach lot defined. Ordinance 80­A, passed in 1987, defined the term “Recreational beach lot” and established limits for urban and rural recreational beach lots. Ordinance 83, passed in 1988, recodified the City Code into its current organizational structure and adopted standards governing recreational beach lots. These standards have not been significantly changed since their adoption. Ordinance 377, passed in 2004, moved the standard governing recreational beach lots to section 20­266 (from section 20­263), and removed the 1987 date from the “grandfathered clause” in section 20­266(12). It also fixed a formatting error where one of the subsections was not properly numbered. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city amend the recreational beachlot ordinance to improve readability, update the out­of­ date reference, and remove unnecessary provisions.  ATTACHMENTS: Recreational Beachlot Issue Paper CITY OT CHAI'IHASSIN MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Standards for Beach Lots ISSUE The section ofthe City Code governing recreational beach lots can be difficult to read and interpret, contains outdated references, and provisions that are not consistent with current city policy. Several sections ofthe Conditional Use Permit (CUP) standards for recreational beach lots, particularly the section goveming ovemight storage and mooring, are poorly structured. ln its current state, it is difficult to read and hard to determine what provisions apply and in what circumstances they apply. The city fiequently receives calls from HOAs interested in amending their CUP or clariffing their understanding of what is and is not permitted, and the confusing structure ofthis section ofthe code can sometimes exacerbate ralher than resolve their confusion. This section also contains an out-of-date reference that should be updated to continually reference the most recently adopted comprehensive plan. Finally, this section outlines a policy allowing adjacent lots under a common omership to consolidate their docks that is confi.rsing and unnecessary. Staff proposes to rewrite sections ofthe code to clarifo the intent ofthe portions that routinely cause confirsion. The substance and natue ofthe provisions goveming recreational beach lots should not be changed, other than updating the out-ofdate reference and removing ururecessary provisions, but phrasing and organization should be reworked in the hopes of creating a more user-friendly section. Sec. 1-2. - Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the term "Recreational beach lot". Sec.20-266. Recreational beach lots. Details the intent ofand standards for recreational beach lots. Amendment History PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO MARKET BOUTEVARD .PO BOX I4T.CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow SUMMARY RELEVANT CITY CODE Planning Commission Standards for Beach Lots November 19,2019 Page 2 Ordinance 80, passed in 1986, established the framework ofour existing zoning code and lists recreational beach los as a conditional use within residential districts. No standards, other than those generally goveming conditional uses, were put in place, nor was the term recreational beach lot defined. Ordinance 80-A, passed in 1987, defined the term "Recreational beach lot" and established limits for urban and rural recreational beach lots. Ordinance 83, passed in 1988, recodified the City Code into its current organizational structure and adopted standards goveming recreational beach lots. These standards have not been significantly changed since their adoption. Beach lots with non-conforming use permits tend to be older, often created by provisions within a subdivision's development contract or, more rarely, they are the result ofa use ofthe parcel predating city ordinances. Between 1992 and 1993, city staff undertook a project to determine what rights these prop€rties had and to determine the extent of their non-conformities. For those properties, a non-conforming use permit was issued by the City Council to formalize how they were being used and to prevent any expansion ofthe non-conformity beyond its verifiable historic level. Staffis often contacted by homeowners associations or property owners that have recreational beach lot rights granted by non-conforming use permits or conditional use permits to ask if they can modifo or expand their beach lot. Many times, they are interested in adding docks or increasing the amount of ovemight watercraft storage on the site. Due to the way portions of the existing ordinance run together and the fact that related provisions are spread throughout the section, they often struggle to decipher what is and is not permitted. The difficulty in interpreting this section also means it is challenging for staff to help them understand what the ordinance permits. Stalfs intent is to clearly break up and outline the ovemight storage provisions, simpliff language and sentence structure, and cluster related provisions to make this portion ofthe Code more accessible to residents and assist staffin explaining how the ordinance applies to a given 2 Ordinance 377, passed in 2004, moved the standard goveming recreational beach lots to section 20-266 (ftom section 20-263), and removed the 1987 date from the "grandfathered clause" in 20- 266(12).lt also fixed a formatting error where one of the subsections was not properly numbered. ANALYSIS There are approximately 26 recreational beach lots in the city. About halfofthese beach lots operate under a conditional use permit and the other half operate under a non-conforming use permit. Typically, the beach lots operating under a conditional use permit were created after 1986 and they meet the requirements ofthe existing conditionals use permit ordinance. Planning Commission Standards for Beach Lots November 19,2019 Page 3 property. Staffdoes not intend to substantively change the ordinance. Since all recreational beach lots are govemed by either a non-conforming use permit or a conditional use permit, any alteration to the content ofthis section would either create a legal non-conformity or require the amendment of the various beach lot permits. This would become especially problematic for the beach lots operating under non-conforming use permits, as large amounts of time, research, written affidavits, inspections, and, in some cases, legal action was required to establish those permits. Additionally, many HOAs have painstakingly created systems to allow for fair use of their beach lots and any alteration ofthe standards goveming these lots would have a significant impact on them and their members. Finally, recreational beach lots can have significant impact on other lake users and altering their standards without extensive public input would be inappropriate. Staffis proposing two minor changes to the content ofthe existing ordinance. Currently, the ordinance references the 2000 Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA) with language indicating that it anticipates this line will be expanded. Currently, the city's comprehensive plan shows the 2020 MUSA line encompassing the city and this has been the case since the last comprehensive plan was adopted. Staffproposes amending the recreation beach lot ordinance to reference the MUSA established by the most recently adopted comprehensive plan. This update will remove any confusion caused by the outdated reference and remove the need to update the ordinance every time a new comprehensive plan is adopted. The other change is removing the subsection that reads: 'No dock shall encroach upon any dock set-back zone, provided, however, that the owner ofany two abutting lakeshore sites may erect one common dock within the dock setback zone appurtenant to the abutting lakeshore sites, ifthe common dock is the only dock on the two lakeshore sites and if the dock otherwise conforms with the provisions ofthis chapter." Not only is this provision confusing and poorly constructed, it does not serve a function. Theoretically, this provision would allow a homeowners associated (HOA) that owned two adjacent parcels of riparian land to consolidate both parcel's docking rights into a single dock located on the lot line. In practice, the city would not consent to the creation ofa new subdivision where the association beach lot was spread over two adjacent parcels and there would be no benefit to the HOA in having two parcels rather than one. Additionally, in a situation where the HOA did own two parcels and wanted to place the dock on the lot line, staffcould administratively create a zoning lot to allow this placement under the code's other provisions. Finally, staffis aware of only one existing beach lot that is comprised of two parcels, and this beach lot is a non-conforming use that would not be impacted by this change. Staff proposes rewriting this subsection to read, "No dock shall encroach upon any dock set-back zone." l)Do nothing. Staffis experienced at reading the ordinance in its current form, and has documentation of previous interpretations to support its application of the ordinance. 3 ALTERNATIVES 2)Amend Sec. 20-266 to improve readability, update the out-of-date reference, and remove unnecessary provisions. Staff recommends Altemative 2. The proposed amendments would read as follows: Sec. 20-266. - Recreational beach lots. lntenl. he city recognizes that the use of lakeshore bymCtiple-pa*ies as a recreational beach lot may be an intensive use of lakeshore that may present conflicts with neighboring uses of lakeshore or the use of other lakeshore on the same lake or the lake itself. Further, beach lots may generate complaints ifthey are not maintained to the same standards as single-family lakeshore lots. Therefore, the city requires the following conditions for recreational beach lots, in addition to such other conditions that may be prescribed in the permit: (1) Recreational beach lots shall have at least 200 feet of lake frontage. (2) For purposes ofthis subsection, the following terms shall mean those beach lots which are located either within (urban) or outside (rural) the Year2000 Metropolitan Urban Service Area boundary as depicted in the most recently adopted comprehensive plan. (3) a. Urban recreationol beach /or.'At least 80 percent ofthe dwelling units, which have appurtenant rights ofaccess to any recreational beach lot, shall be located within 1,000 feet ofthe recreational beach lot. b. Rural recreational beach /ot: A maximum of 50 dwelling units (including riparian lots) shall be permitted appurtenant rights ofaccess to the recreational beach lot. Upon extension of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area boundary into the rural are4 the urban recreational beach lot standards will apply. Except as specifically provided herein, no structure, ice fishing house, cnmper, trailer, tent, recreational vehicle, shelters (except gazebos) shall be erected, maintained, or stored upon any recreational beach lot. For the purpose of this section, a gazebo shall be defined as, "a freestanding roofed structure which is open on all sides." No boat, trailer, motor vehicle, including but not limited to cars, trucks, motorcycles, motorized mini-bikes, all-terrain vehicles or snowmobiles shall be driven upon or parked upon any recreational beach lot. No recreational beach lot shall be used for ovemight camping. 4 (4) (s) Planning Commission Standards for Beach Lots November 19,2019 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission Standards for Beach Lots November 19,2019 Page 5 (6) (7) Boat launches are prohibited. Ne reereatienat Ueaen ev€+ni ak€+edtoq/v are+tere+e* ix watereraft may be stered en a raek, The number efraeks shall net exeeed the loq herleYer; in no ease n€ekhg of €ther water ov€migh+ Overnight storage or overnight mooring of motorized or non-motorized watercraft on recreational beach lots shall be subject to the following limits: a. b. c. Docking: i. A maximum of three motorized or nonmotorized watercraft per allowed dock ii. Ifa recreational beach lot allows more than one dock, the allowed boats may be clustered. Storage on Racks: i. Nonmotorized watercraft such as canoes, kayaks, paddleboards, windsurfers, sailboards, and small sailboats may be stored overnight only if they are stored on racks specifically designed for their storage. ii. No more than six watercraft may be stored on a rack iii. The number of racks shall not exceed either four racks or the amount of storage necessary to permit one rack slip per lot served by the beach lot, whichever is less. Under no circumstance may a recreational beach lot have more than 24 rack slips. Sailboat moorings: i. A maximum of three sailboat moorings may be permitted, subject to the requirements of section 20-266(9). (8) The A maximum number of three docks may be permitted on a recreational beach lots, subject to the following standards: istlree,Ne-deeleshallbe eendi+iens+ a. The recreational beach lot must have Shereliae-ef at least 200 feet of shoreline per dock. and 5 Planning Commission Standards for Beach Lots November 19,2019 Page 6 b. The recreational beach lot must have A+e+efat least 30,000 square feet for the first dock and an additional 20,000 square feet for each additional dock. c. No recreational beach lot dock shall exceed six feet in width, and no such dock shall exceed the greater of50 feet or the minimum straight-line distance necessary to reach a waler depth of four feet. The width (but not the length) ofthe cross-bar ofany "T" or "L" shaped dock shall be included in the computation of length described in the preceding sentence. The crossbar ofany such dock shall not measure in excess of25 feet in lenglh. d.Nodockshallencroachuponanydockset-backzone.'fi@ that th€ ewner ef any tive abutting lakeshere sites may ere€t ene eefiIrnon ;f tne aeel< etlenvise eon (e) @A maximum of three sailboat moorings may be permitted on recreational beach lots subject to the following standards: a. The recreational beach lot must have at least 200 feet of shoreline per sailboat mooring. (10) Ovemight docking, mooring, and slorage of watercraft, where allowed, is restricted to watercraft owned by the owner/occupant or renter/occupant ofhomes which have appurtenant right of access to the recreational beach lot. (11) Docking ofother watercraft or seaplanes is permissible at any time other than overnight. (12) No watercraft or boat lift shall be kept, moored, docked, or stored in the dock setback zone. (13) All recreational beach lots may be used for swimming beach purposes, but only if swimming areas are clearly delineated with marker buoys which conform to the United States Coast Guard standards. (14) All recreational beach lots shall have a buffer sufficient to insulate other property owners from beach lot activities. This buffer may consist of topography, streets, vegetation, distance (width or depth), or other features or combinations of features which provide a buffer. To insure appropriate buffering, the city may impose conditions to insulate beach lot activities including, but not limited to: 6 Planning Commission Standards for Beach Lots November 19,2019 PageT (15) a. Increased side or front yard setbacks for beach areas, docks, racks or other allowed recreational equipment or activities; b. Hours of use; c. Planting and maintenance of trees and shrubs; d. Erection of fences; e. Standards of maintenance including mowing and trimming; painting and upkeep ofracks, docks and other equipment; disposal of trash and debris; f. Increased width, depth or area requirements based upon the intensity of the use proposed or the number of dwellings having rights of access. The use of and location of portable chemical toilets may$e-all,erred must be reviewed and approved as a condition of approval ofa recreational beach lot. The maintenance and use of chemical toilets on some beach lots may be unsuitable because they cannot be adequately screened from residential neighbors or lake users. Any use of chemical toilets on recreational beach lots shall be subject to the following: a. The minimum setback from the ordinary high water mark shall be 75 feet. Side and front yard setbacks shall be maximized to achieve maximum screening from adjacent lots and the lake. b. It may only be used Memorial Day to Labor Day and shall be removed from the lot during the rest of the year. c. It shall be securely anchored to the ground to prevent tipping. d. It shall be screened from the lake and residential property with landscaping. e. It shall be serviced at least weekly. f. Only models designed to minimize the potential for spilling may be used. C. Receipt ofan annual license from the city's Planning depafiment. The license shall be issued unless the conditions of approval ofthis ordinance have been violated. All license applications shall be accompanied by the following information: l Name, address, and phone number of applicants. 2. Site plan showing proposed location of chemical toilets. 3. Name, address, and phone number ofchemical toilet supplier. 4. Plan for commercially maintaining the chemical toilet, including a copy ofany agreement for maintenance, and the name, address, and phone number ofperson responsible for maintenance. 7 Planning Commission Standards for Beach Lots November 19,2019 Page 8 5. A written description ofhow the applicant intends to screen the portable chemical toilet from all views into the property, including views from the lake. Gazebos may be permitted on recreational beach lots subject to City Council approval and the following standards: a. Minimum setback from the ordinary high water mark shall be 75 feet. b. No gazebo shall be closer to any lot line than the minimum required yard setback for the zoning district in which the structure is located. c. Maximum size ofthe structure shall not exceed 250 square feet. d. Maximum height shall not exceed 20 feet. e. Gazebos shall make use of appropriate materials, colors, and architectural and landscape forms to create a unified, high-quality design concept for the lot which is compatible with adjacent and neighboring structures. f. Gazebos shall be properly maintained. Structures which are rotted, unsafe, deteriorated or defaced shall be repainted, repaired, removed, or replaced by the homeowners or beach lot association. g. The following improvements are prohibited in gazebos: screening used to completely enclose a wall, water and sewer service, fireplaces, and electricity. The placement ofdocks, buoys, diving ramps, boat racks, and other structures shall be indicated on a site plan approved by the City Council. To the extent feasible, the city may impose such conditions even after approval of the beach lot if the city finds it necessary. glplan\cio codeuol9\2019{5 various\beachlot updare\beachlor issue paper.docx (16) (17) (18) 8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Require Traffic Studies as Part of Site Plan Reviews Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.3. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning site plan traffic impacts. SUMMARY OF REQUEST As the city builds out, there are fewer undeveloped sites available. This, combined with the fact that some of the buildings in the city’s older developments are nearing the end of their functional life span, means that there is increased interest in redeveloping existing sites. Many times this redevelopment takes the form of a new use that has the potential to generate more traffic than the pre­existing use. In some cases, these developments may increase traffic to the point where the level of service of the surrounding roads is decreased. The best way to determine the impact of a development on the surrounding roads is to conduct a traffic study; however, the city’s site plan application requirements and review standards do not require applicant’s to provide a traffic study. Staff is proposing amending this section of the City Code to require the inclusion of traffic studies with site plan applications when requested by staff and to add maintaining an acceptable road system level of service to the evaluation standards. This change would ensure staff can obtain sufficient information to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the city’s road system and that the City Council can act to protect the public interest in situations where a proposal will unacceptably degrade the road system’s level of service. A full analysis can be found in the attached issue paper. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 20 ­ Zoning, Article II. ­ Administration and Enforcement, Division VI. ­ Site Plan Review. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city require traffic studies, when appropriate, be included with site plan applications and list impacts on road system level of service as a site plan review criterion. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Require Traffic Studies as Part of Site Plan ReviewsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.3.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment toChapter 20 concerning site plan traffic impacts.SUMMARY OF REQUESTAs the city builds out, there are fewer undeveloped sites available. This, combined with the fact that some of thebuildings in the city’s older developments are nearing the end of their functional life span, means that there is increasedinterest in redeveloping existing sites. Many times this redevelopment takes the form of a new use that has the potentialto generate more traffic than the pre­existing use. In some cases, these developments may increase traffic to the pointwhere the level of service of the surrounding roads is decreased.The best way to determine the impact of a development on the surrounding roads is to conduct a traffic study; however,the city’s site plan application requirements and review standards do not require applicant’s to provide a traffic study.Staff is proposing amending this section of the City Code to require the inclusion of traffic studies with site planapplications when requested by staff and to add maintaining an acceptable road system level of service to the evaluationstandards. This change would ensure staff can obtain sufficient information to evaluate the impact of proposeddevelopments on the city’s road system and that the City Council can act to protect the public interest in situationswhere a proposal will unacceptably degrade the road system’s level of service.A full analysis can be found in the attached issue paper.APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 20 ­ Zoning, Article II. ­ Administration and Enforcement, Division VI. ­ Site Plan Review.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the city require traffic studies, when appropriate, be included with site plan applications and listimpacts on road system level of service as a site plan review criterion. ATTACHMENTS: Site Plan Traffic Impact Issue Paper CITY OT CHANHASSII'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM FROM: TO Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Site Plan - Traffrc Impact DATE: SUBJ: The section ofthe City Code that regulates site plans does not require a traffic study or explicitly list traffic impacts under its evaluation standards. SUMMARY As the city builds out, there are fewer undeveloped sites available. This combined with the fact that some of the buildings in the city's older developments are nearing the end oftheir functional life span means that there is increased interest in redeveloping existing sites. Many times this redevelopment takes the form ofa new use that has the potential to generate more traffrc than the preexisting use. In some cases, these developments may increase traffic to the point where the level of service ofthe surrounding roads is decreased. The best way to determine the impact of a development on the surrounding roads is to conduct a traffic study; however, the city's site plan application requirements and review standards do not require applicant's to provide a traffic study. Staff is proposing amending this section of the City Code to require the inclusion oftraffic studies with site plan applications when requested by staff and to add maintaining an acceptable road system level of service to the evaluation standards. This change would ensure staff can obtain sufficient information to evaluate the impact ofproposed developments on the city's road system and that the City Council can act to protect the public interest in situations where a proposal will unacceptably degrade the road system's level ofservice Chapter 20 - Zontng, Article II. - Administration and Enforcement, Division VI. - Site Plan Review The intent of the city's site plan review process is to facilitate a comprehensive review ofnew or intensified development with the goal of mitigating the adverse impacts ofone land use upon another, promoting the orderly and safe flow of traffrc, and preserve and enhance the natural and PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO MARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I4T.CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 ISSUE RELEVANT CITY CODE ANALYSIS Planning Commission Site Plan - Traffic Impact November 19,2019 Page2 built environment. To accomplish these goals, the City Code specifies what materials should be submitted with a site plan application and the standards that a site and building plan should meet. Despite the fact that the ordinance's intent statement implies that offsite impacts on neighboring properties and traffic should be addressed, the application requirements and standards within the site plan ordinance are very focused on the site itself. This intemal orientation is because applicants only have control over property they own, so the review process fiocuses on how they are developing their property and how it accesses the public right ofway and surrounding parcels. Additionally, the city has historically been engaged in greenfield development. In these cases, large projects that could create significant traffic impacts were required to either dedicate right-of-way and construct public streets or build private streets to accommodate their intemal traffic circulation. These types oflarge developments were also guided to locate near collector or arterial roadways that could absorb the traffic generated by the developments. As some ofthe city's older commercial and industrial buildings age, there is increased interest in redeveloping these properties. Often times the proposed redevelopment is a more intense use than the existing building could accommodate, and, in some cases, the traffic infrastructue that was constructed as part of the initial development may not be able to adequately support the new use. Due to the intemal focus ofthe site plan ordinance, it is difficult to evaluate and address these types of offsite impacts. Staff first became aware of this concem several years ago when a number ofolder properties redeveloped to incorporate drive-thru facilities. The city addressed concerns over drive-through stacking and impacts by amending the City Code in 2017 to classifu all drive-throughs as conditional uses, and adding a provision to the condition use permit (CUP) standards for drive-throughs allowing the city to require a vehicle stacking study as part ofthe CUP application. This amendment has allowed staff to more effectively evaluate and respond to subsequent requests to construct new drive+hrough facilities within the city. With the continued interest in redeveloping existing sites, it is important to ensure that the city has access to sufficient information to evaluate traffic impacts for all types of uses, not just drive- thoughs. Staffis proposing adding a provision to the site plan application requirements allowing staff to require traffic studies and adding maintaining an acceptable road system level ofservice to the site plan evaluation standards. This change would ensure staff can obtain suffrcient information to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the city's road system and that the City Council can act to protect the public interest in situations where a proposal will unacceptably degrade the road system's level of service. ALTERNATIVES 1) Do nothing. Many larger projects provide traffic studies and a development's impact on the road system is part of the holistic review of a site plan. ) Planning Commission Site Plan - Traffic Impact November 19,2019 Page 3 2) Amend Sec. 20- 109 and Sec. 20- l l0 to allow the city to require traffic studies and to list impact on road system level of service as a review criterion. RECOM ATION Staff recommends Altemative 2. The proposed amendments would read as follows: Sec. 20-109. - Applications. Application for a site plan review shall be made to the city planner on forms provided by the city and shall be frled 30 days in advance of the planning commission meeting, at which it is to be considered. Prior to filing an application for site plan review, the applicant shall attend a conference with city staff. The primary purpose ofthe conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance on the general merits of the proposal and its conformity to the provisions ofthe comprehensive plan and the City Code before incurring substantial expense. Incomplete or deficient applications shall not be scheduled for a meeting unless the community development director has determined that official action is warranted. The application shall also include: ( I ) Evidence of ownership or an interest in the property; (2) The application fee; (3) Complete site plans, sigred by a registered architect, civil engineer, landscape architect or other design professional, to include the following. (4) General: a. Name of project. b. Name, address and telephone number of applicant, engineer, and owner of record. c. Legal description (certificate of survey will be required). d. Date proposed, north arrow, engineering scale, number of sheets, name of drawer. e. Vicinity map showing relationship ofthe proposed development to surrounding streets, rights-of-way, easements and natural features. f. Description of intended use ofthe site, buildings and structures, including type of occupancy and estimated occupancy load. g. Existing zoning and land use. h. Tabulation box indicating: l. Size of parcel in acres and square feet. 2. Gross floor area ofeach building. 3. Percent ofsite covered by building. J Planning Commission Site Plan - Traffrc Impact November 19,2019 Page 4 4. Percent of lot coverage on site broken out by impervious surface and pervious pavement. 5. Percent ofsite covered by parking area. 6. Projected number of employees. 7 . Number of seats if intended use is a restaurant or place of assembly. 8. Number of parking spaces required. 9. Number of parking spaces provided including handicapped. 10. Height of all buildings and structures and number of stories. ll. Breakdown ofthe building area allocated for specific uses, e.g., manufacturing, office, retail, showroom, warehouse, etc. (5) Site and building plan: a. Property line dimensions, location ofall existing and proposed sfiuctures with distance from boundaries, distance between structures, building dimensions and floor elevations. b. Grading and &ainage plans showing existing natural features (topography, wetlands, vegetation, etc.), as well as proposed grade elevations and sedimentation and stormwater retention ponds. Plans shall include runoff and storage calculations for ten- year and 100-year events. If stormwater is proposed to be routed to existing stonnwater ponds, documentation shall be provided to demonstrate that the downstream pond is sufficient to accommodate the additional stormwater. c. All existing and proposed points of egress/ingress showing widths at property lines, tuming radii abutting rights-of-way with indicated centerline, width, paving width, existing and proposed median cuts, and intersections of streets and driveways. d. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimension for all driveways, parking spaces, parking lot aisles, service roads, loading areas, fire lanes, emergency access (if necessary), public and private streets, alleys, sidewalks, bike paths, direction oftraffic flow and trafiic-control devices. e. Landscaping plan in accordance with the provisions of article XXV' f. Location, access and screening detail of trash enclosures. g. Location and screening detail of rooftop equipment. Screening shall be provided from the perspective ofa point six feet high at all adjacent property lines or from a distance of250 feet, whichever is geater. h. Location and detail of signage including method of lighting, height, width, sign display area, etc. i. Lighting location, style, mounting and photo metrics. 4 Planning Commission Site Plan - Traffic Impact November 19,2019 Page 5 j. Building elevations from all directions indicating materials and colors. Interiot floor plans may be required. k. Utility plan identifiing size and direction of existing water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, distance of hydrant to proposed building. l. List ofproposed hazardous materials, use and storage. m. Proposed fre protection system. n. Such other information as may be required by the city. o. Photo composite images, artistic renderings, or site elevations which depict the visual impact of the proposed development's design, landscaping, street layout, signage, pedestrian ways, lighting, buildings, or other details that affect land use within the city shall be submitted. Such images and renderings shall be from key vantage points and provide an undistorted perspective ofthe proposed development from abutting properties, less intensive land uses, and/or from entryway locations. Photorealistic imaging or renderings are the appropriate level ofresolution. (6) llithin the HC districts, the application shall also include: a. Building elevations from all directions, indicating materials, colors and landscaping at installation. b. Building and site views from Highway 5, the appropriate access boulevard (north or south of Highway 5), and any other appropriate arterial or collector roadways. c. Site views showing the relationships of the proposed building or development to adjacent development, including buffered areas. d. Drawings ofall significant or atypical site features, such as unusual landscaping, manmade water features other than retention ponds, outdoor sculpture, or other large- scale artwork and other uncommon constructs. e. Sample building materials. f. Sample paving materials, upon the city's request. (7) Ilithin the BCO distict, the application shall also include: a. Identified boundaries ofthe primary zone and secondary zone on a drawing depicting existing conditions and on a site plan depicting the proposed development pattem. b. Calculations and/or drawings that identify the allowable density (number of units or building coverage) under this Code, including lands lying in the primary and secondary zone. Calculation of allowable density shall specifically exclude lands classified as bluffs, floodplains and designated wetlands. Calculation of allowable lot coverage may include bluffs and floodplains but shall specifically exclude designated wetlands. (8) The application shall include a trafiic study, if requested by the City. 5 Sec. 20-1 10. - Standards. Planning Commission Site Plan - Traffic Impact November 19. 2019 Page 6 In evaluating a site and building plan, the planning commission and city council shall consider its compliance with the following: (l) Consistency with the elements and objectives ofthe city's development guides, including the comprehensive plan, official road mapping, and other plans that may be adopted; (2) Consistency with this division; (3) Preservation ofthe site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and desigring grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of neighboring developed or developing areas; (4) Creation of a harmonious relationship of buildings and open spaces with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development; (5) Creation of a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features, with special attention to the following: a. An intemal sense of order for the buildings and uses on the site and provision ofa desirable environment for occupants, visitors and general community; b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping; c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression ofthe design concept and the compatibility ofthe same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and d. Vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms oflocation and number ofaccess points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation ofpedestrian and vehicular traflic and arrangement and amount of parking. (6) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects ofdesign not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses. (7) Maintaining an acceptable road system level of service. (8) Within the HC districts, consistency with the purpose, intent and standards of the HC districts. (9) Within the BCO district, consistency with the purpose, intent and standards of the BCO district. g:\plan\city code\2019\201945 various\site plan (traffic)hite plan tramc $udy issue pater.docx 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Zoning Standards for Solar Energy Systems Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.4. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning accessory solar energy systems. SUMMARY OF REQUEST The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified supporting residential and business solar development that maintains community character as a natural resources goal, and listed amending the City Code to include definitions, permitted uses and plans, and access to sunlight as it pertained to solar energy as a policy. The Natural Resources Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan clarifies this policy by noting that the city has prioritized tree planting which means public investment in solar energy systems will be limited; however, the city wishes to facilitate the use of solar energy by private businesses and residences. Staff has reviewed the city’s existing solar energy provisions as well as literature and model ordinances produced by the American Planning Association, the Great Plains Institute, and other organizations, and is proposing amending the City Code to meet the policy objective stated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment would allow accessory solar energy systems as a permitted accessory use in all districts, adopt relevant definitions, encourage roof­ mounted systems but allow for ground­mounted systems where roof­mounted systems are impractical, ensure that solar energy systems do not create nuisance glare, and establish basic design, installation, and permitting requirements for these systems. Staff is not proposing expanding the City Code’s existing provisions that protect access to solar resources, as the existing code strikes a good balance between solar resources and other considerations. Staff is not proposing any restrictions on private individual’s ability to enter into solar easements or adopt more restrictive standards that they feel are better suited to their neighborhood. A full analysis can be found in the attached staff report. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Sec. 7­18. ­ Building code: Adopts Chapter 1325 ­ Solar Energy Systems of the Minnesota State Building Code. Sec. 18­60. ­ Lots:  Requires subdivision lot layouts to take into consideration the potential use of solar energy design PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Zoning Standards for Solar Energy SystemsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.4.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter20 concerning accessory solar energy systems.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThe 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified supporting residential and business solar development that maintainscommunity character as a natural resources goal, and listed amending the City Code to include definitions, permitteduses and plans, and access to sunlight as it pertained to solar energy as a policy. The Natural Resources Chapter of theComprehensive Plan clarifies this policy by noting that the city has prioritized tree planting which means publicinvestment in solar energy systems will be limited; however, the city wishes to facilitate the use of solar energy byprivate businesses and residences.Staff has reviewed the city’s existing solar energy provisions as well as literature and model ordinances produced by theAmerican Planning Association, the Great Plains Institute, and other organizations, and is proposing amending the CityCode to meet the policy objective stated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment would allowaccessory solar energy systems as a permitted accessory use in all districts, adopt relevant definitions, encourage roof­mounted systems but allow for ground­mounted systems where roof­mounted systems are impractical, ensure that solarenergy systems do not create nuisance glare, and establish basic design, installation, and permitting requirements forthese systems. Staff is not proposing expanding the City Code’s existing provisions that protect access to solarresources, as the existing code strikes a good balance between solar resources and other considerations. Staff is notproposing any restrictions on private individual’s ability to enter into solar easements or adopt more restrictivestandards that they feel are better suited to their neighborhood.A full analysis can be found in the attached staff report.APPLICATION REGULATIONSSec. 7­18. ­ Building code: Adopts Chapter 1325 ­ Solar Energy Systems of the Minnesota State Building Code. Sec. 18­60. ­ Lots:  Requires subdivision lot layouts to take into consideration the potential use of solar energy design features. Sec. 20­58. ­ General conditions for granting:  Lists inadequate access to direct sunlight as a practical difficulty that can justify a variance request. Sec. 20­232. ­ General issuance standards:  Lists not resulting in the destruction, loss, or damage of solar access as a finding for granting a conditional use permit. Sec. 20­1061. ­ Intent:  Design standards for commercial, industrial, and office­institutional developments require the consideration of solar effects in the site design. Sec. 20­1086. ­Intent:  Design standards for multi­family developments require the consideration of solar effects in the site design. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city permit accessory solar energy systems in all zoning districts, as well as, adopt definitions and standards governing these systems. ATTACHMENTS: Accessory Solar Energy Systems Issue Paper T + \ fl[ CITY OT CHAI'IIIASSXN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Accessory Solar Energy SystemsSUBJ: ISSUE The City Code is largely silent on accessory solar energy systems, and amending the code to explicitly address the installation ofthese systems was adopted as a policy in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified supporting residential and business solar development that maintains community character as a natural resources goal, and listed amending the City Code to include definitions, permitted uses and plans, and access to sunlight as it pertained to solar energy as a policy. The Natural Resources Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan clarifies this policy by noting that the city has prioritized tree planting which means public invesunent in solar energy systems will be limited; however, the city wishes to facilitate the use of solar energy by private businesses and residences. Staff has reviewed the city's existing solar energy provisions as well as literature and model ordinances produced by the American Planning Association, the Great Plains Institute, and other organizations, and is proposing amending the City Code to meet the policy objective stated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment would allow accessory solar energy systems as a permitted use in all districts, adopt relevant definitions, encourage roof-mounted systems but allow for ground-mounted systems where roof-mounted systems are impractical, ensure that solar energy systems do not create nuisance glare, and establish basic design, installation, and permitting requirements for these systems. Staffis not proposing expanding the City Code's existing provisions that protect access to solar resources, as the existing code strikes a good balance between solar resources and other considerations. Staffis not proposing any restrictions on private individual's ability to enter into solar easements or adopt more restrictive standards that they feel are better suited to their neighborhood. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO I'4ARKET BOULEVARD . PO 8OX ]47 .CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 SUMMARY Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19,2019 Page2 RELEVANT CITY CODE Sec. 7-18. - Building code: Adopts Chapter 1325 - Solar Energy Systems of the Minnesota State Building Code. Sec. l8-60. - Lots: Requires subdivision lot layouts to take into consideration the potential use of solar energy design features. Sec. 20-58. - General conditions for granting: Lists inadequate access to direct sunlight as a practical diffrculty that canjustifr a variance request. Sec.20-232. - General issuance standards: Lists not resulting in the destruction, loss, or damage of solar access as a finding for granting a conditional use permit' Sec. 20- 1061 . - Intent: Design standards for commercial, industrial, and office-institutional developments require the consideration of solar effects in the site design' Sec. 20- 1086. - Intent: Design standards for multi-family developments require the consideration of solar effects in the site design. Issue I: Ovemiew on solor energ) systems Solar energy systems can be active or passive. Passive systems utilize solar energy without transforming it to another form ofenergy or transferring it via a heat exchanger. Examples ofa passive system would be skylights to naturally light the interior ofa house, large south facing windows to allow the sun to help heat the house, or utilizing construction materials that absorb sunlight and radiates it into the interior ofthe house. Since passive solar energy systems are integral design elements ofa building, they are not addressed in this report. Their use would be governed by the building code and general zoning provisions applicable to all buildings. Active solar energy systems fall into two major categories: 1) photovoltaic systems that convert sunlight into energy, and 2) solar thermal systems that use solar energy to create heat. Photovoltaic systems can be mounted at a fixed angle or placed on tracking devices that follow the sun. These systems can be ofvastly different scales ranging from large solar farms that produce enough power to supply a community to small residential systems that partially meet the needs of a single-family home. Within communities such as Chanhassen, they most often take the form of relatively modest roof-mounted systems designed to provide energy for on-site use. Solar thermal systems are often used to heat water as part of residential hot water systems. Such systems can also be used for space heating/cooling or heating spas and swimming pools. These systems do not typically generate electrical energy, but rather reduce the amount ofelectricity needed to heat water or a building. 2 ANALYSIS Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19,2019 Page 3 Issue 2: llhot scale/lype of syslems should be allowed? Solar energy systems can be ofvastly different scale. Large solar energy systems designed to produce significant amounts ofenergy for sale to utility companies are not currently permitted by the city's zoning code, nor does the 2040 Comprehensive Plan contemplate permitting such uses. Staffs proposed ordinance would only apply to accessory solar energy systems where the energy generated is primarily intended for on-site use. From a zoning perspective, the differences between the various types ofactive solar energy systems are not significant enough to require separate regulations. In instances where system design has extemal impacts, for example using solar reflectors rather than collectors, general design provisions limiting placement, height, and glare should be sufficient to prevent negative impacts. Staff believes it is appropriate to use broad language and definitions that can encompass all types ofactive solar energy systems so that overly specific language does not unintentionally prevent the use ofnew innovations in solar energy systems. As was previously noted, passive/building inte$ated solar energy systems would continue to be govemed by the state building code and general zoning provlslons. Issue 3: Howfilhere should lhese systems be allowed? The 2040 Comprehensive Plans goal of supporting residential and business solar development is best achieved by classi$ing accessory solar energy systems as a permitted use in all ofthe city's zoning districts. This classification will allow property owners in the city the option of installing accessory solar energy systems that comply with the city's zoning code by applying for and receiving a building permit. Staffbelieves that classiffing these systems as conditional uses, which would require public hearings and City Council approval, would subject them to an excessive and unnecess:rry level of scrutiny. Issue 1: Potenlial impact on neighbors The most common concem that municipalities have about allowing solar energy systems in urban environments is the possibility ofthe solar panels creating glare that annoys the neighbors or poses a danger to motorists. Cunently, the city's Planning Department reviews building permits for solar energy systems in order to ensue that their proposed location will comply with the glare provisions of the city's nuisance ordinance. To date, all of the residential solar energy systems that have been installed in the city have been roof-mounted systems, which, by virtue oftheir elevation and orientation, have a low potential for affecting neighboring properties or motorists. The city has not received any complaints about glare generated from solar energy systems. Generally, glare is not a signihcant issue for systems using solar collectors since they are designed to absorb sunlight rather than reflect it. Solar collectors are constructed ofdark-colored materials and covered with anti-reflective coatings in order to minimize the reflected light since reflected light represents a loss ofoperation efficiency. The glare produced by solar collectors is similar to that produced by a glass window, and since panels are angled towards the sun, most ofthe light reflect is 3 Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19,2019 Page 4 directed up and away. Additionally, when glare is generated, it tends to be for a relatively short duration due to both the daily and seasonal movements ofthe sun. Some solar energy systems do utilize reflectors rather than solar collectors. These systems do have the potential to reflect enough light to cause glare issues. In most cases, these issues can be mitigated through a combination of location, screening, and system design. Staff proposes to address potential glare issues by requiring solar energy systems to orient reflection angles away from neighboring windows, requiring systems to be located where they will not direct glare towards public right ofways, expressing a preference for roof-mounted systems, and requiring screening for ground-mounted systems. The other potential impact ofaccessory solar energy systems is aesthetic. Some neighbors may find these systems to be visually obtrusive or unsightly, or be concemed that the proliferation ofthese systems could significantly alter the character oftheir neighborhood. These types of concems can be applied to any other type of accessory use in residential neighborhoods, and accessory solar energy systems should be subject to the same types ofprovisions that govem other accessory structures. Staffproposes requiring roof- and building-mounted systems to use dark unobtrusive colors or colors that blend into roofor building that the system is attached too, and requiring ground-mounted systems to be located in the rear ofthe structure outside ofany required setbacks. A screening requirement is also proposed for ground-mounted systems and these systems would be subject to their District's maximum accessory structure height. Issue 5: Should Homeownerc Associalions be able to restrict these systems? Cities have the option to adopt language preventing homeowners associations (HOA) from adopting more restrictive requirements for solar energy systems than are present in the City Code. The advantage ofthese tlpes ofprovisions is that they ensure that interested citizens have the ability to install solar energy systems meeting the city's guidelines regardless of what neighborhood they happen to live in. These provisions can also avoid the conflicts that can arise when a resident buys and installs a system after receiving a permit from the city, only to have the HOA inform them that the HOA's bylaws do not allow the system in question. It should be noted that the city is often unaware of HOA restrictions and that it is up to the HOAs to notify residents of their rules and, if necessary, enforce their regulations. The downsides to these types of provisions is that they can be seen as govemment overreach and preempting local control. Some residents feel that they and their neighbors should be able to determine what types ofaccessory uses are suitable for their neighborhood. It should be noted that an amendment preventing more restrictive requirements would not just prevent an HOA from banning solar energy systems, it would also prevent them from exercising more moderate limits such as establishing higher aesthetic criteria, requiring additional screening, or imposing minimum efficiency standards for solar energy systems. 4 Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19,2019 Page 5 Issue 6: Should lhe cily guarantee solar access? Minnesota law allows for the creation ofsolar easements that protect a property's solar access tn perpetuiry. Typically, these easements prevent adjacent properties from building structures or planting vegetation that would block sunlight from reaching a solar energy system. Some communities have adopted ordinances that allow them to require developers to enter into solar easements as a condition ofa PUD, subdivision, or conditional use permit. A few cities throughout the nation have adopted provisions guaranteeing solar access throughout their communities. Currently, Chanhassen requires subdivisions to take potential solar energy design features into account, lists not resulting in the destruction or damage ofsolar access as a condition for granting conditional use permits, and requires commercial, industrial, office-institutional, and multi-family developments to consider solar effects in their site design. The city's current approach requires staff and developers to be mindful of potential impact of development on solar resources, but does not prioritize solar resources over other natural resources. Statutory provisions or solar easements ensuring access to solar resources do guarantee that the functionality of an installed solar energy system will not be impaired by future development, but they can also come into conflict with other environmental resources. For example, an already existing tree could grow to height where it begins to shade a solar collector or new homeowner may find they are unable to plant trees due to a neighbor's solar energy system. In these cases, blanket provisions protecting solar access for the installation ofa new solar energy system may create conflicts with pre-existing trees. The city has chosen to prioritize tree cover in its 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and for this reason, staff does not propose adopting any new Code provisions guaranteeing solar access or requiring solar easements. Private citizens would still have the right to purchase or grant solar easements to guarantee permanent solar access for their solar energy systems. Staff proposes allowing HOAs and similarly empowered neighborhood level organizations to determine what, if any, additional requirements are appropriate for their community. ALTERNATIVES l) Do nothing. The glare ordinance and state building code provide sufficient guidance to allow roof-mounted systems in residential districts. 2) Amend the City Code to include definitions, standards, and list accessory solar energy systems as permitted uses in all districts. 3) Amend the City Code to include definitions, standards, list accessory solar energy systems as permitted uses in all districts, and include provisions limiting the ability of HOAs to restrict the installation of solar energy systems. 4) Amend the City Code to include definitions, standards, list accessory solar energy systems as permitted uses in all districts, include provisions limiting the ability of HOAs to restrict the installation ofsolar energy systems, and protect resident's access to sunlight. 5 Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19" 2019 Page 6 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Altemative 2. Staffbelieves that adopting definitions, standards, and clearly stating what solar energy systems are allowed and where they may be located will make the community more solar friendly. Staff does not believe it is practical to attempt to guarantee access to sunlight and feels HOAs and similar organizations should be allowed to determine their own policies on solar energy systems. The proposed solar energy ordinance would read as follows: Sec. 20-573. - Permitted accessory uses (l l) Accessory Solar Enerry Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Division 10. - Accessory Solar Energr Systems Sec. 20-593. - Permitted accessory uses (10) Accessory Solar Energr Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec. 20{13. - Permitted accessotT uses (9) AccessorT Solar Energr Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec. 20-633. - Permitted accessorT uses (8) Accessory Solar Enerry Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec. 20-643. - Permitted accessory uses (7) Accessory Solar Enerry Systems (subject to the requiremeuts of section 20-f093) Sec. 20{53. - Permitted accessor? uses (8) Accessory Solar Energr Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec. 20{73. - Permitted accessorT uses (8) Accessory Solar Energr Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec. 20-682. - Permitted accessorJ uses (8) Accessory Solar Enerry Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec. 20{93. - Permitted accessorT uses 6 Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19,2019 Page 7 (5) Accessory Solar Energr Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec. 20-713. - Permitted accessorT uses (4) Accessory Solar Enerry Systems (subject to the requirements ofsection 20-1093) Sec. 20-733. - Permitted accessory uses (4) Accessory Solar Energr Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-f093) Sec. 20-743. - Permitted accessorT uses Accessory Solar Energr Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec. 20-753. - Permitted accessory uses (4) Accessory Solar Enerry Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Sec.20-772. - Permitted accessorJ uses (4) Accessora Solar Energr Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-f093) Sec. 20-793. - Permitted accessory uses (4) Accessory Solar Enerry Systems (subject to the requirements ofsection 20-1093) Sec. 20-813. - Permitted accessorT uses (6) Accessory Solar Enerry Systems (subject to the requirements of section 20-1093) Division 10. - Accessory Solar Energr Systems Sec. 20-1093. - Accessory Solar Energr Systems l) Purpose.It is the intent of this section to meet the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and preserve the health, safety, and welfare ofthe community's citizens by facilitating the safe, effective, and efficient use of accessory solar energr systems installed to reduce the on-site consumption of utility-supplied electric enerry. The following solar energr standards specifically implement the following goal from the Comprehensive Plan: a. Support residential and business solar development that maintains community character. 7 Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19,2019 Page 8 2) DeJinitions,In this division, the following terms have the stated meanings: "Active Solar Energr Systems" means a solar energr system whose primary purpose is to harvest enerry by transforming solar enerry into another form of enerry or transferring heat from a collector to another medium using mechanical, electrical, or chemical means. "Building-integrated Solar Enerry Systems' means an active solar enerry system that is an integral part of a principal or accessorJ building rather than a separate mechanical device, replacing or substitution or an architectural or structural component of the building. Building-integrated systems include but are not limited to photovoltaic or hot water solar energr systems that are contained within roofing materials, windows, skylights' and awnings. "Passive Solar Enerry System" means a solar enerry system that captures solar light or heat without transforming it to another form of enerry or transferring the enerry via a heat exchanger. "Solar Collector'means a device, structure, or a part ofa device or structure for which the primary purpose is to transform solar radiant energi into thermal, mechanical, chemical, or electrical energr. "Solar Collector Surface" means any part of a solar collector that absorbs solar enerry for use in the collector's ener5/ transformation process. Collector surface does not include frames, supports, and mounting hardware. "Solar Enerry" means radiant enerry received from the sun that can be collected in the form of heat or light by a solar collector. "Solar Energr System" means a device or structural design feature, a substantial purpose of which is to provide daylight for interior lighting or provide for the collection, storage and distribution ofsolar enerry for space heating or cooling, electricity generating, or water heating. 3) Standards. a, Applicability. A system is considered an accessory solar enerry system only if it supplies electrical or thermal power primarily for on-site use, except that when a property upon which the facility is installed also receives electrical power supplied by a utility company, excess electrical power generated and not presently needed for on-site use may be used by the utility company. 8 Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19,2019 Page 9 b. Exemption. Passive or building-integrated solar enerry systems are exempt for tbe requirements of this section and shall be regulated as any other building element. i. Whenever practical, all accessory solar energr systems shall be attached to a building. Ifnot designed to be attached to a building' the applicant shall demonstrate by credible evidence that such systems cannot feasibly be attached to a building due to structural limitations of the building. tl.In residential zoning districts, no portion of any accessory solar enerry system shall be located within or above any front or side yard or within any required setback of any property' save that they may be located within rear yards so long as they maintain a minimum rear setback of ten feet. Ground-mounted systems on corner lots may not be located in any yard abutting a street. In non-residential zoning districts, ground-mounted systems must comply with the district's setbacks. d. Height. i. Building- or roof-mounted solar enerry systems shall comply with the maximum height requirements in the applicable zoning district. Roof- mounted systems on pitched or hipped roofs may not extend above the peak of the roof. ii. Ground-mounted solar energi systems shall not exceed the maximum accessory structure height within the underlying zoning district. e. Glore. i. Reflection angles from accessory solar enerry system surfaces shall be oriented away from neighboring windows. lI.Accessory solar enerry systems shall be designed and located in order to prevent reflective glare towards adjacent street right-of-way. f. Screening i. Ground-mounted solar energr systems shall be screened from view to 9 llt, c. Location. g. Design. Roof-mounted solar collectors shall be flush mounted on pitched or hipped roofs, and shall not extend beyond the exterior perimeter of the building on which the system is mounted. ii. Roof- and building-mounted solar ener5/ systems shall use dark unobtrusive colors or colors that blend with the color ofthe roof or building. iii. All exterior electrical and/or plumbing lines must be buried below the surface of the ground and shall be placed in a conduit. 4) Permit and Installotion: a. A building permit is required and shall be obtained for any solar energr system prior to installation. b. If roof-mounted, documentation shall be provided verifoing that the roof can safely support the proposed system. The design and installation of accessory solar energr systems shall conform to applicable industry standards, including those of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Underwriters Laboratories (UL), or other similar certi$ing organizations, and shall comply with the Municipal Building Code and with all other applicable fire and life safety requirements. The manufacture specifications shall be submitted as part of the application. 5) Abondonmezf. If the solar enerry systems remain nonfunctional or inoperative for a continuous period of one year, the system shall be deemed to be abandoned and shall constitute a public nuisance. The owner shall remove and recycle the abandoned system at their expense after a demolition permit has been obtained. Removal includes the entire structure including transmission equipment. C:\PLAN\City Code\2019\2019-05 Various\Solar\Accessory Solar Issue Paper.docx c l0 Planning Commission Accessory Solar Energy Systems November 19,2019 Page l0 the extent possible without reducing their efficiency, Screening may include walls, fences, or landscaping. d. All grid connected systems shall have an agreement with the relevant utility prior to the issuance of a building permit. A visible external disconnect must be provided if required by the utility. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Correct a Typographical Error in the Interim Uses Statute Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.5. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning fixing a topographical error in the Interim Use Permit (IUP) standards. SUMMARY OF REQUEST Section 20­322(4) reads, “The date of event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty.” This section should read “date or event”. A full analysis can be found in the attached issue paper. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Chapter 20 ­ Zoning, Article IV. ­ Conditional Uses. This article details general criteria, conditions, and procedures for granting and revoking Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) and IUPs. BACKGROUND In 1990, the city created IUPs and began classifying uses that it desired to be temporary in nature as interim uses. The purpose of IUPs are to accommodate uses that are currently appropriate to an area, but which the city anticipates will not be appropriate in the future. The main difference between an IUP and a CUP is that a CUP will continue to be in effect so long as the use is maintained, whereas IUPs have built in expiration clauses. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city amend the interim use ordinance to read "date or event". PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Correct a Typographical Error in the Interim UsesStatuteSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.5.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment toChapter 20 concerning fixing a topographical error in the Interim Use Permit (IUP) standards.SUMMARY OF REQUESTSection 20­322(4) reads, “The date of event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty.” This sectionshould read “date or event”.A full analysis can be found in the attached issue paper.APPLICATION REGULATIONSChapter 20 ­ Zoning, Article IV. ­ Conditional Uses. This article details general criteria, conditions, and procedures forgranting and revoking Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) and IUPs.BACKGROUNDIn 1990, the city created IUPs and began classifying uses that it desired to be temporary in nature as interim uses. Thepurpose of IUPs are to accommodate uses that are currently appropriate to an area, but which the city anticipates willnot be appropriate in the future. The main difference between an IUP and a CUP is that a CUP will continue to be ineffect so long as the use is maintained, whereas IUPs have built in expiration clauses.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the city amend the interim use ordinance to read "date or event". ATTACHMENTS: IUP Issue Paper CITY OT CIIAI'IHASSXN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Fringe Business District - Uses Section 20-322(4) reads, "The date ofevent that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty." This section should read "date or event". In 1990, the city created interim use permits (lUP) and began classifoing uses that it desired to be temporary in nature as interim uses. The purpose of IUPs are to accommodate uses that are curently appropriate to an area, but which the city anticipates will not be appropriate in the future. The main difference between an IUP and a conditional use permits (CUP) is that a CUP will continue to be in effect so long as the use is maintained, whereas IUPs have built in expiration clauses. ANALYSIS The intent of IUPs are to permit temporary uses with set expiration points. The expiration point is either a fixed date or period, for example l0 years from the issuance of the IUP, or a set event, for example the extension ofurban services to the site. Both types of termination conditions are present within IUPs issued by the City; however, the general issuance standards for interim use permits section 20-322(4) reads. "The date ofevent that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty." As written, this would mean the city should only issue IUPs with frxed dates of termination, for example the 1O-year anniversary ofthe permit, and not for future events ofan uncertain date, like the availability of urban services. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 71OO MARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX t47. CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 553]7 ISSUE BACKGROUND RELEVANT CITY CODE Chapter 20 - Zo ng, Article IV. - Conditional Uses: This article details general criteria, conditions, and procedures for granting and revoking CUPs and IUPs. Planning Commission Fringe Business District - Uses November 19, 2019 Page 2 ALTERNATIVES RECOMMEND N Stalf recommends Altemative 1. The proposed Code Amendment would read as follows: Sec.20-322. - General issuance standards. (Ord. No. 377, 5 28, 5-24-04) g:Vlan\city code\2o19\2019{5 variors\iup minor correclion\iup minor comction issue paper-docx 1 In order to be consistent with how IUPs have been issued and with the intent of IUPs, this section should read "date or event". Staffbelieves the use of the word "of' rather than "or" is the result ofa typing enor during codification, and proposes fixing the error. As noted earlier, this language would be consistent with the existing termination clauses as well as the intent ofthe IUP ordinance. I ) Amend the ordinance to read "dater or event". 2) Do nothing. IUPs come up very seldom and conditions could likely be phrased to meet the requirements ofthe existing ordinance. The Planning Commission shall recommend an interim use permit and the council shall issue interim permits only if it finds, based on the proposed location, that: (l) The use meets the standards ofa conditional use permit set forth in section 20-232 of the City Code. (2) The use conforms to the zoning regulations. (3) The use is allowed as an interim use in the zoning district. (4) The date efor event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty. (5) The use will not impose additional costs on the public if it is necessary for the public to take the property in the future. (6) The user agrees to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for permission of the use. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Restrict Merchandise Sold at Temporary and Special Events to Goods Normally Sold On Site Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.6. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning allowable merchandise at temporary and special events. SUMMARY OF REQUEST In 2017, the city revised the section of the City Code that governs temporary and special events to better address larger events and races. As part of these revisions, the city switched from listing “criteria for approval” to stating “grounds for denial”. The goal of this shift was to provide stronger legal justification for denying permits that the city believed could negatively impact adjacent parcels or overtax municipal infrastructure and resources. Most of the previously listed criteria for approval where rephrased and incorporated into the grounds for denial; however, the requirement that only merchandise normally sold or stocked by the occupants could be sold or promoted was overlooked. Due to this omission, properties with commercial zoning could theoretically apply for a temporary outdoor event permit to allow a business to set up a pop­up shop in its parking lot. Since the goal of the ordinance is to allow for Chanhassen’s businesses and organizations to promote themselves and host community events, rather than accommodating transient merchants, staff feels this is contrary to the intent of the ordinance. Staff proposes adding the omitted provision limiting merchandise sales to the section of the Code regulating temporary and special events. A full analysis can be found in the attached issue paper. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Sec. 1­2. ­ Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the term temporary outdoor sales. Sec. 20­964. ­ Temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales, and special events. Establishes the intent of temporary and special event ordinance, permit requirements for events, application process, grounds for denial, permit conditions, and provisions for administration and enforcement of the ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Restrict Merchandise Sold at Temporary and SpecialEvents to Goods Normally Sold On SiteSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.6.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment toChapter 20 concerning allowable merchandise at temporary and special events.SUMMARY OF REQUESTIn 2017, the city revised the section of the City Code that governs temporary and special events to better addresslarger events and races. As part of these revisions, the city switched from listing “criteria for approval” to stating“grounds for denial”. The goal of this shift was to provide stronger legal justification for denying permits that the citybelieved could negatively impact adjacent parcels or overtax municipal infrastructure and resources. Most of thepreviously listed criteria for approval where rephrased and incorporated into the grounds for denial; however, therequirement that only merchandise normally sold or stocked by the occupants could be sold or promoted wasoverlooked.Due to this omission, properties with commercial zoning could theoretically apply for a temporary outdoor event permitto allow a business to set up a pop­up shop in its parking lot. Since the goal of the ordinance is to allow forChanhassen’s businesses and organizations to promote themselves and host community events, rather thanaccommodating transient merchants, staff feels this is contrary to the intent of the ordinance. Staff proposes adding theomitted provision limiting merchandise sales to the section of the Code regulating temporary and special events.A full analysis can be found in the attached issue paper.APPLICATION REGULATIONSSec. 1­2. ­ Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the term temporary outdoor sales.Sec. 20­964. ­ Temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales, and special events. Establishes the intent of temporary and special event ordinance, permit requirements for events, application process, grounds for denial, permit conditions, and provisions for administration and enforcement of the ordinance. BACKGROUND Amendment History Ordinance 80 passed in 1986 established the framework for the existing zoning code and listed temporary outdoor display of merchandise for sale as a conditional use within commercial districts. Granting temporary sales permit required Council action and no standards beyond those associated with general conditional use permits (CUP) were established. Ordinance 83 passed in 1988 reorganized the City Code, established a definition for temporary outdoor sales and established CUP standards for them in section 20­290. These new standards took into account traffic and parking impact and allowed for the administrative review of temporary sales permits. Both retail promotions and produce stands were allowed under this ordinance. Ordinance 243 passed in 1995 amended section 20­290 to provide a justification for regulating temporary sales, to stipulate the required permit application process, establish criteria for approval, list the permitted types of sales, and stipulate the general conditions that were placed upon these permits. One of the criteria for approval was that only merchandise normally sold or stocked by the occupant on the subject premises could be sold. Ordinance 377 passed in 2004 relocated section 20­290 to section 20­312 and temporary outdoor sales were moved from conditional to permitted accessory uses within commercial districts. A section was also added further regulating the location of displays associated with temporary events. Ordinance 511 passed in 2010 relocated section 20­312 to section 20­964 and expanded the section to explicitly address temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activities rather than just temporary outdoor sales. Ordinance 619 passed in 2017 expanded the section to encompass special events and to require race addendums for events leaving the applicant’s property. Temporary events and sales were added to both the industrial office park and office institutional district’s list of permitted accessory uses. This section of the Code was significantly altered to include unique provisions and requirements for temporary sales, seasonal sales, and special events. The criteria for approval section was replaced with grounds for denial section. The limitation of sales to merchandise normally sold and stocked by the occupant on the subject premises was not retained. Note: These standards have been relocated within the City Code several times, which makes it extremely challenging to trace the history of these provisions. Staff has done its best to note the relevant changes, but some amendments may have been missed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city add a prohibition on the sale of merchandise not normally sold by the occupants of the premise to the temporary and special event ordinance, with exemptions for the sale of goods accessory to a proposed event. ATTACHMENTS: Temporary Event Merchandise Issue Paper CITY OT CIIANHASSAI'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM TO Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Temporary Events - Allowable Merchandise FROM: SUBJ: ISSUE When the temporary sales and events ordinance was updated in 2017, the prohibition on selling merchandise not normally stocked by the occupant ofthe premises was removed. This created the potential for pop up retail businesses to operate under temporary event permits within commercial disticts. In2017, the city revised the section ofthe City Code that governs temporary and special events to better address larger events and races. As part ofthese revisions, the city switched from listing "criteria for approval" to stating "grounds for denial". The goal of this shift was to provide stronger legal justification for denying permits that the city believed could negatively impact adjacent parcels or overt.x municipal infrastructure and resources. Most ofthe previously listed criteria for approval where rephrased and incorporated into the grounds for denial; however, the requirement that only merchandise normally sold or stocked by the occupants could be sold or promoted was overlooked. Due to this omission, properties with commercial zoning could theoretically apply for a temporary outdoor event permit to allow a business to set up a pop up shop in its parking lot. Since the goal of the ordinance is to allow for Chanhassen's businesses and organizations to promote themselves and host community events, rather than accommodating transient merchants, staff feels this is contrary to the intent ofthe ordinance. Staff proposes adding the omitted provision limiting merchandise sales to the section ofthe Code regulating temporary and special events. RELEVANT CITY CODE Sec. 1-2. - Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the term temporary outdoor sales. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1t10 //OO I4ARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I47 . CHANHASSEN . MINNESOTA 55517 ,II 0\ tl fl[S DATE: SUMMARY Planning Commission Temporary Events - Allowable Merchandise November 19,2019 Page 2 Sec. 20-964. - Temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales, and special events. Establishes the intent oftemporary and special event ordinance, permit requirements for events, application process, grounds for denial, permit conditions, and provisions for administration and enforcement of the ordinance. Amendmenl Hislory Ordinance 80 passed in 1986 established the framework for the existing zoning code and listed temporary outdoor display of merchandise for sale as a conditional use within commercial districts. Granting temporary sales permit required Council action and no standards beyond those associated with general conditional use permits (CUP) were established. Ordinance 83 passed in 1988 reorganized the City Code, established a definition for temporary outdoor sales and established CUP standards for them in section 20-290. These new standards took into account traffic and parking impact and allowed for the administrative review of temporary sales permits. Both retail promotions and produce stands were allowed under this ordinance. Ordinance 243 passed in 1995 amended section 20-290 to provide ajustification for regulating temporary sales, to stipulate the required permit application process, establish criteria for approval, list the permitted tnes ofsales, and stipulate the general conditions that were placed upon these permits. One ofthe criteria for approval was that only merchandise normally sold or stocked by the occupant on the subject premises could be sold. Ordinance 377 passed in 2004 relocated section 20-290 to section 20-312 and temporary outdoor sales were moved from conditional to permitted accessory uses within commercial districts. A section was also added further regulating the location ofdisplays associated with temporary events. Ordinance 5 1 1 passed in 20 I 0 relocated section 20-3 I 2 to section 20-964 and expanded the section to explicitly address temporary outdoor events, seasonal and sidewalk sales activates rather than just temporary outdoor sales. 2 Ordinance 619 passed in 2017 expanded the section to encompass special events and to require race addendums for events leaving the applicant's prop€rty. Temporary events and sales were added to both the industrial office park and office institutional district's list of permitted accessory uses. This section ofthe Code was significantly altered to include unique provisions and requirements for temporary sales, seasonal sales, and special events. The criteria for approval section was replaced with grounds for denial section. The limitation ofsales to merchandise normally sold and stocked by the occupant on the subject premises was not retained. Planning Commission Temporary Events - Allowable Merchandise November 19,2019 Page 3 Note: These standards have been relocated within the City Code several times, which makes it extremely challenging to trace the history ofthese provisions. Staff has done its best to note the relevant changes, but some amendments may have been missed. The intent ofthe city's special and temporary event ordinance is to allow local businesses and organizations the opportunity to promote themselves or organize community events that require the temporary use ofan outdoor location. In 1986, the ordinance was originally designed to accommodate weekend promotions and sidewalk sales; however, in 1988 it was it was subsequently expanded to accommodate and regulate seasonal produce stands. In 1995, a formal permitting process and prohibition on the sale ofmerchandise not normally sold on site was established. As business started to engage in more promotional events that did not neatly fall into the categories of retail promotions or seasonal produce stands, the ordinance was revised in 2010 to allow for more general temporary outdoor events as well as seasonal and sidewalk sales. The prohibition on outside merchandise remained as the intent was still to allow an existing business to promote itself, rather than permit transient merchants to operate within the city. In 2017, the city noticed a significant increase in the number of permit applications for races and walks. The city realized that the existing temporary event ordinance was not designed to evaluate the impact that large events that left the applicant's property could have adjacent parcels and the city's trail, sidewalk, and road system. Additionally, several organizations were hosting large events with thousands of attendees that were far beyond the scope that had been anticipated by earlier ordinances. In response to this, the city rewrote the temporary and special event ordinance to create three categories ofevent permits, a race addendum, and establish criteria for the denial of permits. Most of the preexisting limitations on permits where carried over; however, the prohibition on the sale of merchandise not normally sold on site was not. This prohibition was not carried over because staffbelieved that the prohibition on activities not permitted by zoning or other statute was suffrcient, and because ofthe potential for desired temporary and special events to include the incidental sale ofgoods. For example, a bank's open house may feature a food truck or a church's charity walk might include t-shirt sales. Staff felt that this increased flexibility was especially desirable for special events, particularly those hosted by non-profits that typically had no on-site commercial activity. Unfortunately, by not including this prohibition, staff undermined the intent ofthe ordinance. Without the restriction to goods typically sold on site, pop-up tent vendors and otler transient merchants could be permitted by ordinance. For example, a gas station could apply for a temporary event permit to allow an outside merchant to set up a weekend t-shirt stand in their parking lot. Since 1995, it has been the explicil intent ofthe temporary and special event ordinance to prohibit pop-up parking lot stands. 3 ANALYSIS Staff believes that a criterion for denial should be added to the section ofthe City Code regulating temporary and special events that prohibits the sale of merchandise not normally sold on the property, with an exemption for seasonal sales and goods accessory to the event. Structuring the prohibition in this manner will prohibit transient merchants from operating under a temporary event permit, but will allow for food trucks and limited sales associated with special events. It will also accommodate concession sales at events hosted by non-profit organizations, like churches and schools, which typically do not sell merchandise on site. Finally, seasonal sales would continue to be allowed, accommodating traditional community fixtures like produce stands and Christmas tree lots. Staff feels the above proposal will balance providing some additional flexibility in permitted event activities with prohibiting pop up parking lot sales. ALTERI{ATIVES I ) Do nothing. The city rarely receives these types of requests, and business owners are typically leery of leasing portions oftheir parking lots to unaffiliated entities. 2) Amend Sec. 20-964 to include a prohibition on sales of merchandise not normally sold by the occupants of the premises, with exceptions for the sale ofgoods that are clearly accessory to the proposed event. Staff recommends Altemative 2. The proposed amendments would read as follows: Sec.20-964. - Temporary outdoor events, sidewalk sales, seasonal sales and special events (7) Grounds for deniol. A sales or event permit application may be denied if based on the application and other relevant information, the city finds that: a. Information contained in the application or otherwise submiued by the applicant is false or insufficient to allow for an effective evaluation ofthe proposed sale or event. b. The applicant fails to provide required or requested supplemental information after having been notified by the city that additional documentation is required. c. The applicant fails to agree to all conditions and terms of permit. d. The applicant has outstanding fees due to the city, unresolved code enforcement or noncompliant building permit issues, has violated the terms and conditions ofa previously issued sale or event permit, or has had a previously issued sale or event permit revoked by the city. e. The type of sale or event is not permitted by zoning or other statute. f. The sale or event proposes to sell merchandise not normally sold or stocked by the occupants of the premises. Seasonal sales permits are exempted from this 4 Planning Commission Temporary Evens - Allowable Merchandise November 19,2019 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission Temporary Events - Allowable Merchandise November 19,2019 Page 5 requirement, as is the sale of goods determined to be accessory to a proposed event (i.e. food truck or concession sales during an event or the limited sale of goods as part of a charity event). gf. The time, hours, location, size, or natue ofthe sale or event will substantially disrupt or burden traffic, parking, public safety, or other municipal services and the city does not have sufficient resowces to mitigate these impacts. hg. The location or time of the sale or event conflicts with previously scheduled sales or events, and the city does not have sufficient resources available to adequately support both sales or events and/or normal operation ofthe city. ih. The location of the sale or event would interfere with construction or maintenance work scheduled to take place upon or along public property or right-of-way. ji. The location of the sale or event would cause undue hardship for adjacent uses. ki. The sale or event is likely to endanger public safety, health or property. lk. The applicant does not have the required liability insurance. glplan\city c.deuol9U01945 varioustemp evenb limi6 on merch issue paper.docx 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Minimum Driveway Configuration Standards Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.7. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning driveways. SUMMARY OF REQUEST There have been several ongoing issues with driveways in the City of Chanhassen. The first is that builders who are informed that they are over their zoning district’s hardcover limits are increasingly choosing to reconfigure driveways in order to bring their proposed plans into compliance with City Ordinance. These reconfigured driveways sometimes taper so quickly down to the city’s 10­foot minimum width that there is not enough space provided to park cars in front of the garage or the movements needed to enter and exit the garage are impractical. The second concern is that the driveway ordinance’s minimum 10­foot side yard setback is more restrictive than the Residential Low and Medium (RLM) Density District’s 5­foot side yard setback. This creates a situation where many lots with RLM zoning have garages located five feet from the side lot line, which necessitates an exemption from the city’s 10­foot side yard driveway setback. The final issue is that the driveway ordinance has been amended seven times since it was adopted in 2001. Many of these amendments added new subsections but did not place them under headings linking them to existing provisions. This has led to the current driveway ordinance being difficult for residents and builders to navigate. Staff is recommending expanding the minimum design standards to ensure that driveways provide sufficient off­street parking and allow for functional movements, that the driveway setback be made commensurate to the property’s underlying zoning for the first 20 feet, and that the section be reorganized to improve readability. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Sec. 20­908. ­ Exempts driveways from all yard setbacks. Sec. 20­1122. ­ Access and driveways:  Establishes the design criteria, standards, and setbacks that govern all driveways within the city. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Minimum Driveway Configuration StandardsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.7.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment toChapter 20 concerning driveways.SUMMARY OF REQUESTThere have been several ongoing issues with driveways in the City of Chanhassen. The first is that builders who areinformed that they are over their zoning district’s hardcover limits are increasingly choosing to reconfigure driveways inorder to bring their proposed plans into compliance with City Ordinance. These reconfigured driveways sometimestaper so quickly down to the city’s 10­foot minimum width that there is not enough space provided to park cars in frontof the garage or the movements needed to enter and exit the garage are impractical.The second concern is that the driveway ordinance’s minimum 10­foot side yard setback is more restrictive than theResidential Low and Medium (RLM) Density District’s 5­foot side yard setback. This creates a situation where manylots with RLM zoning have garages located five feet from the side lot line, which necessitates an exemption from thecity’s 10­foot side yard driveway setback.The final issue is that the driveway ordinance has been amended seven times since it was adopted in 2001. Many ofthese amendments added new subsections but did not place them under headings linking them to existing provisions.This has led to the current driveway ordinance being difficult for residents and builders to navigate.Staff is recommending expanding the minimum design standards to ensure that driveways provide sufficient off­streetparking and allow for functional movements, that the driveway setback be made commensurate to the property’sunderlying zoning for the first 20 feet, and that the section be reorganized to improve readability.APPLICATION REGULATIONSSec. 20­908. ­ Exempts driveways from all yard setbacks. Sec. 20­1122. ­ Access and driveways:  Establishes the design criteria, standards, and setbacks that govern all driveways within the city. BACKGROUND Amendment History 1. Ord. 117 passed in 1990 created Sec. 20­1122 and required proper accesses with width and number of access drives to minimize traffic congestion and hazard. (Note: This section was a relocation of virtually identical provisions created by Ord. 80 in 1986.) 2. Ord. 144 passed in 1991 amended Sec. 20­908 to allow driveways in any required yard. 3. Ord. 330 passed in 2001 created the base of the existing ordinance. It established that driveways could be setback five feet from the side yard after the first 20 feet. Existing design standards, reduction/encroachment provisions, and access limitations created. 4. Ord. 377 passed in 2004 established the Residential Low and Medium Density (RLM) District, which had alternating 5­foot side yard setbacks. 5. Ord. 409 passed in 2006 clarified that a 10­foot setback existed for the first 20 feet. 6. Ord. 423 passed in 2006 amended RLM setbacks to be five feet on the garage side and 10 feet on the house side with a minimum separation of 15 feet between structures. 7. Ord. 452 passed in 2007 established additional design criteria. 8. Ord. 507 passed in 2010 tweaked language regarding encroachment agreements, elaborated criteria for reducing driveway setbacks, and stated permit requirements. 9. Ord. 612 passed in 2015 established criteria for permitting the City Engineer to allow driveways with grades over 10 percent. 10. Ord. 619 passed in 2017 limited maximum impervious surface of driveway within flag lots to 33 percent. 11 . Ord. 628 passed in 2017 replaced the term impervious surface with lot coverage. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city reorganize the driveway section, update the driveway side yard setback standards, and expand driveway minimum design standards. ATTACHMENTS: Driveway Issue Paper CITY OT CIIANIIASSII'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Driveway Standards FROM: DATE: SUBJ: The city's minimum driveway standards are not sufficient to ensure that functional driveways are installed, nor do the required side yard setbacks align with some ofthe city's zoning districts. Additionally, the existing driveway ordinance contains redundancies and should be reorganized to improve clarity. SUMMARY There have been several ongoing issues with driveways in the City of Chanhassen. The first is that builders who are informed that they are over their zoning district's hardcover limits are increasingly choosing to reconfigure driveways in order to bring their proposed plans into compliance with City Ordinance. These reconfigured driveways sometimes taper so quickly down to the city's l0-foot minimum width that there is not enough space provided to park cars in fiont of the garage or the movements needed to enter and exit the garage are impractical. The second concem is that the driveway ordinance's minimum l0-foot side yard setback is more restrictive than the Residential Low and Medium (RLM) Density District's S-foot side yard setback. This creates a situation where many lots with RLM zoning have garages located hve feet from the side lot line, which necessitates an exemption from the city's lO-foot side yard driveway setback. The final issue is that the driveway ordinance has been amended seven times since it was adopted in 2001. Many ofthese amendments added new subsections but did not place them under headings linking them to existing provisions. This has led to the current driveway ordinance being difficult for residents and builders to navigate. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. Fx 952.227.1110 77OO MARKEI BOULEVARD .PO BOX I4T.CHANHASSEN 'MINNESOTA 55317 01I t fl[\ ISSUE Staff is recommending expanding the minimum design standards to ensure that driveways provide sufficient off-streel parking and allow for functional movements, that the driveway setback be made commensurate to the property's underlying zoning for the first 20 feet, and that the section be reorganized to improve readability. Planning Commission Driveway Standards November 19,2019 Page2 Sec. 20-908. - Exempts driveways from all yard setbacks. Sec. 20-l122. - Access and driveways: Establishes the design criteria, standards, and setbacks that govem all driveways within the city. Amendment History l) Ord. 117 passed in 1990 created Sec. 20-1122 and required proper accesses with width and number of access drives to minimize traffic congestion and hazard (Note: This section was a relocation of virtually identical provisions created by Ord. 80 in 1986.) 2) Ord. lzA passed in 1991 amended Sec. 20-908 1o allow driveways in any required yard. 3) Ord. 330 passed in 2001 created the base of the existing ordinance. It established that driveways could be setback five feet from the side yard after the first 20 feet. Existing design standards, reduction/encroachment provisions, and access limitations created. 4) Ord. 377 passed in 2004 established the Residential Low and Medium Density (RLM) District, which had altemating s-foot side yard setbacks. 5) Ord. 409 passed in 2006 clarified that a l0-foot setback existed for the first 20 feet. 6) Ord.423 passed in 2006 amended RLM setbacks to be five feet on the garage side and l0 feet on the house side with a minimum separation of l5 feet between structures. 7) Ord. 452 passed in 2007 established additional design criteri4 8) Ord. 507 passed in 2010 tweaked language regarding encroachment agreements, elaborated criteria for reducing driveway setbacks, and stated permit requirements. 9) Ord. 612 passed in 2015 established criteria for permitting the City Engineer to allow driveways with grades over l0 percent. l0) Ord. 6t9 passed in 2017 limited maximum impervious surface of driveway within flag lots to 33 percent. I 1) Ord. 628 passed in 2017 replaced the term impervious surface with lot coverage. Issue I: Selbacks The first ordinance addressing driveway setbacks was passed in l99l and allowed them to be placed within any required yard setback. This essentially meant that driveways could be placed up to the property line, unless a drainage and utility easement was present. In 2001, the driveway ordinance was amended to state that driveway setbacks could be reduced to five feet after the first 20 feet from the road or if circumstances warranted. The verbatim minutes associated with this amendment stated that the Planning Commission was trying to balance allowing residents to place parking pads for boatVtrailers alongside their garage with not having driveways, especially those associated with side loading garages, paved right up to the lot line. In 2006, the ordinance was further amended to clarify that a l0-foot setback existed for the first 20 feet from the road, since the original language did not actually state what setback, ifany, existed for the first 20 feet of driveway length. 2 RELEVANT CITY CODE ANALYSIS Planning Commission Driveway Standards November 19,2019 Page 3 Currently, all properties in the city are subject to the same driveway setbacks, regardless oftheir underlying zoning district. Driveways are required to be setback 10 feet from the side yard for the first 20 feet from the road after which the setback may be reduced to five feet or the width ofthe propeny's drainage and utility (D&U) easement, whichever is greater. The Code does allow driveway setbacks to be reduced with the approval ofthe City Engineer ifcertain criteria are met; however, one ofthe criteria is lot frontage offa cul-de-sac or neck/flag lot that does not permit adequate access width while meeting the side yard setback. Provisions are also made for granting encroachment agreements into the side yard D&U easements. Issues have arisen because the RLM district and several Planned Unit Development-Residential (PUD-R) Districts have S-foot garage side setbacks combined with 25-foot front yard setbacks. When homes are built with garages five feet from the side lot line and a 25-foot long driveway. it is not possible to design a functional driveway that maintains a 10-foot side yard setback for 20 feet of the driveway's 25-foot length. Stafls practice has been to have the City Engineer grant driveway setback exemptions for these properties; however, this means these homes require additional administrative approvals as part of the building permit process. Additionally, the exemptions clause in the driveway setback ordinance is intended to address extenuating circumstances associated with flaglneck and cul-de-sac lots, rather than accommodate every property in a suMivision. This diffrculty could be addressed either by eliminating the side yard setback for driveways, by reducing it to five feet for all properties, or by making it commensurate with a property's zoning. The first option creates the possibility for parking areas next to the garage that go up to the lot line. Staff regularly receives calls fiom neighbors concemed about boats, trailers, and campers being stored near the lot line, which is allowed by ordinance, and allowing homeowners to install permanent parking surfaces up to the lot line would likely increase the number and severity ofthese concems. In addition, allowing the installation of pavement and associated gading right up to lot lines has the potential to divert runoff onto neighboring properties and otherwise negatively affect an area's drainage. Finally, installation of permanent surfaces near or on the lot line is likely to increase the number of lot line disputes that occur, especially since the city does not conduct inspections to verifo that structues, like parking pads, permitted through zoning permits are installed in the proposed location. The second option would address the issue, but would potentially cause snow storage and driveway run offissues for Single-Family Residential (RSF) Districts and PUD-Rs designed and graded with l0-foot side yard setbacks in mind. Reducing these properties' driveway setbacks to five feet would also facilitate closer driveway spacing within the right ofway, and could create aesthetic situations where two large driveways on adjacent properties could be separated by as little as l0 feet. Finally, these properties are already allowed to reduce the driveway setback to five feet after the first 20 feet of lengh, which permits the creation of side parking pads. The third option would address the issue by allowing properties designed to have I S-foot rather than 20-foot separation between adjacent structures to install driveways that line up with their garages. Issues such as the minimum distance between driveways would be mitigated by the fact that these districts typically require altemating 5- and lO-foot setbacks. Some of the city's more recent 3 Planning Commission Driveway Standards November 19,2019 Page 4 PUD-RS, like Arbor Glen, have already adopted language establishing S-foot driveway side yard setbacks; however, an ordinance change would be needed to address older existing PUD-Rs and properties in the RLM district. Staffbelieves that making driveways' side yard setback commensulate with a property's zoning district's side yard setback while continuing to allow a reduction to five feet after the first 20 feet would be the best remedy for this issue. Issue 2: Minimum Slandards When builders and homeowners are told that they are at or over their property's lot cover limit, they generally try to find areas of paved surface that can be removed rather than redesign and reduce the size ofa proposed house or addition. Driveways are often the first target for reduction. In some cases, the proposed driveway configurations do not accommodate off-street puuking and create dilficulties in entering and exiting the garage. While the driveway ordinance establishes a minimum width of 10 feet, a maximum width of 24 feet at the right of way line and a maximum width of50 feet within the property, it does not allow staff to require a practical driveway configuration. In several cases, prospective homebuyers have contacted the city about the possibility ofreceiving a variance to expand driveways that were reduced to meet lot cover requirements due to the diffrculty ofnavigating these driveways. In other cases, builders have poured driveways significantly larger than what was proposed to address the deficiencies ofthe approved driveway. which causes the property to exceed its lot cover limits and requires the city to take enforcement actions. Staffbelieves that it is reasonable to require that driveways be designed to facilitate adequate ingress and egress to the garage and provide a number of off-street parking spaces equivalent to the number of garage stalls. To accomplish this, stalf is proposing that driveways be required to extend the width ofthe garage doors for a distance ofat least l8 feet before tapering down to a reduced width. Staff chose 18 feet because it is the city code's minimum depth for a parking stall and it would provide adequate maneuverability within the driveway. Issue 3: Reorganizalion ond Clarity The city's driveway ordinance has been amended seven times since it was established in 1990. The result is an ordinance with 13 numbered subsections without headings where provisions goveming similar elements are not always located near each other. For example, subsection I notes that its setbacks do not apply to cul-de-sac or neck/flag lots, but the criteria for reducing those setbacks are contained in subsection 8, and subsection 5 notes an additional setback not mentioned in subsection l. Staff proposes reorganizing the driveway ordinance into six main categories, each of which will contain all of the relevant clauses. For example, the clauses currently contained in subsections l, 5, and 8 would all be placed under a new subsection called "setbacks". Staffbelieves this will make it 4 Planning Commission Driveway Standards November 19,2019 Page 5 easier for all parties to read and implement the city's driveway ordinance. The proposed formatting and organization can be found in the recommendation section at the end ofthis report. As part ofthe reorganization, numerous non-substantive changes to the wording and grammar ofthe provisions are also included and redundant language has been removed. 1) Do nothing. 2) Amend the City Code to reorganize the driveway section. 3) Amend the City Code to reorganize the driveway section and update the side yard setbacks. 4) Amend the City Code to reorganize the driveway section, update the side yards setbacks, and expand minimum design standards. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Altemative 4. Staff believes: 1) that expanded minimum design standards will reduce the number of non-functional/impractical driveways that are installed; 2) that aligning driveway and yard setbacks will reduce the number ofexemptions requested; and, 3) that reorganizing the section will increase its clarity. The proposed amended driveway ordinance would read as follows: Sec.20-1122. - Access and driveways. The purpose of this section is 1o provide minimum design criteria, setback and slope standards for vehicular use. The intent is to reduce interference with drainage and utility easements by providing setback standards; reduce erosion by requiring a hard surface for all driveways; to limit the number of driveway access points to public streets and to direct drainage toward the street via establishment of minimum driveway slope standards. Parking and loading spaces shall have proper access from a public right-of-way. The number and width ofaccess &ives shall be located to minimize traffic congestion and abnormal traffic hazard. All driveways shall meet the following criteria: l) Setbacks: Driveways shall ines meet thezoningdistrict'srequiredsideyardsetbachexceptffi yarkbaek+equirement in the following circumstances: a. Beginning 20 feet from the front propeny line, driveways may be setback a minimum offive feet from the side property line or the distance ofthe existing drainage and utility easement on the particular lot or parcel. b. Encroachment into a side yard drainage and utility easement must be reviewed and approved by the city and may requires an encroachment agreement' 5 ALTERNATIVES Planning Commission Driveway Standards November 19,2019 Page 6 Driveway setbacks may be reduced subject to approval by the City Engineer and the+Uo+vinfe+iteriq if they meet the following criteria: i. The lot frontage on a lot that accesses a cul-de-sac "bubble" or neck/flag lot does not permit adequate driveway access width or side yard setback; ii. The driveway will not interfere with any existing drainage swale or easement in which a utility is contained; iii. Shallregtlire An easement encroachment agreement from the Engineering department, if required, is obtained; iv. The driveway must be designed to maintain stormwater drainage runoff on the property to ensure that it will not €ause direct runoff onto adjacent properties; v. Snow storage may not be placed on adjacent properties; and, vi. A minimum S-foot side yard setback shall be maintained. 2) Separation: On cornerlots, the minimum@ rva;dine spacing between the edge ofthe driveway and the corner right ofway line shall be 30 feet te+he+dgeeflthedd+e+vay. 3) Grades: Driveway grades shall be between a minimum of one-half of one percent and a maximum grade of l0 percent at any point in the driveway. Ilextearla+i€-eireumstasees exis& The City Engineer may approve driveway grades in excess of l0 percent ifthey determine that extenuating circumstances exist. Examples of extenuating circumstances include: bluffs, existing steep grades, shoreland setbacks, wetland conditions, and tree preservation. 4) Design Standards: All driveways must be constructed in accordance with cunent construction requirements/details. Additionally, they must adhere to the following standards: a. Within the right of way, driveways should access city streets at 90 degrees. b. In areas leeated within th @ Driveways shall be surfaced with bituminous, concrete or other hard surface material, as approved by the city engineer. In areas eutside ttrc MUS^ ity c. Accessory driveways shall be maintained as natural grass or be constructed of bituminous concrete, or paver surface. 6 c Planning Commission Driveway Standards November 19,2019 Page 7 d. For A-2, PUD-R for single-family detached houses, RR, RSF, R4 and RLM for single-family detached residential uses, the width of the driveway access shall not exceed 24 feet at the right-of-way line. @ Inside the property line ofthe site, the maximum driveway width shall not exceed 50 feet. For flaglneck lots, the lot coverage of the driveway access within the neck portion of flaglneck lots shall not exceed 33 percent ofthe neck's area. e. For all €t&er-uses other than those specified in paragraph (d) above, the width ofthe driveway access shall not exceed 36 feet in width measured at the roadway right-of-way line. f. For all lots, no portion of the right-of-way may be paved except that portion used for the driveway. g. For all lots, the minimum driveway width shall not be less than 10 feet. h. A tumaround is required on a driveway entering onto a state highway, county road or collector roadway as designated in the comprehensive plan, and onto city slreets where this is deemed necessary by the City Engineer, based on traffic counts, sight distances, street grades, or other relevant factors. If the Engineer requires a tumaround, this requirement will be stated on the building permit and the design of the turnaround must be approved by the City Engineer. i. The driveway must be at least the width of the garage door(s) for a distance of 18 feet starting at the garage door and extending outwards. 5) Number of: Driveway accesses within residential districts are limited as follows: a. One driveway access is allowed from a single residential lot to the street. b. Separate driveways serving utility facilities are permitted. 6) Permits Required: a. A driveway permit is required when any alteration is made to a driveway in the public right-of-way. b. A zoning permit may*e is required for any other driveway work not in the public right of way @ to determine if the improvement will meet zoning ordinance requirements ef{hepa*+ieularJe+e+parcel. C:\PLAN\MWUssue Pap€rs and Reports (Drafu)\Driveways\Driveway Issue Paper.docx 7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Require Single­Family Homes to Have Walkways and Concrete Pads for Stairs and Landings Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.8. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning sidewalks and concrete pads. SUMMARY OF REQUEST Sidewalks and entrance/stair landings are typical features of homes; however, there are instances where they are omitted from proposed projects in order to meet the requirements of the city’s zoning code. When these features are not included, homeowners often discover that they are necessary and have them constructed after the fact. Often these after­the­fact additions are constructed without a permit and do not meet the requirements of the City Code, which can lead to the city having to take enforcement actions. Staff is proposing amending the Code requiring applicants to include these features in order to give staff the ability to require the revision of projects that have a high potential of causing future problems. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Sec. 20­905. ­ Single­family dwellings. This section lists the city’s minimum standards for detached single­family dwellings. Sec. 20­908. ­ Yard regulations. This section allows certain architectural elements to encroach specified distances within required yard setbacks and specifies what structures may be located within city easements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city require new homes to include sidewalks and pads for stairs, landings, and access doors other than those from a dwelling to the outdoors. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Require Single­Family Homes to Have Walkways andConcrete Pads for Stairs and LandingsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.8.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment toChapter 20 concerning sidewalks and concrete pads.SUMMARY OF REQUESTSidewalks and entrance/stair landings are typical features of homes; however, there are instances where they areomitted from proposed projects in order to meet the requirements of the city’s zoning code. When these features arenot included, homeowners often discover that they are necessary and have them constructed after the fact. Often theseafter­the­fact additions are constructed without a permit and do not meet the requirements of the City Code, which canlead to the city having to take enforcement actions. Staff is proposing amending the Code requiring applicants to includethese features in order to give staff the ability to require the revision of projects that have a high potential of causingfuture problems.APPLICATION REGULATIONSSec. 20­905. ­ Single­family dwellings. This section lists the city’s minimum standards for detached single­familydwellings.Sec. 20­908. ­ Yard regulations. This section allows certain architectural elements to encroach specified distanceswithin required yard setbacks and specifies what structures may be located within city easements.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the city require new homes to include sidewalks and pads for stairs, landings, and access doorsother than those from a dwelling to the outdoors. ATTACHMENTS: Sidewalks and Pads Issue Paper CITY OT CHANHASSXI'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomonow MEMORANDUM TO: FROMr Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Sidewalks and Concrete PadsSUBJ: The City Code does not require single-family homes to have sidewalks or concrete pads for stairs, landings, and access doors, other than those from a dwelling to the outdoors. These features are common-sense amenities that help facilitate safe ingress/egress and their subsequent addition can cause properties to exceed their permitted lot cover. Sidewalks and entrance/stair landings are typical features ofhomes; however, there are instances where they are omitted fiom proposed projects in order to meet the requirements ofthe city's zoning code. When these features are not included, homeowners often discover that they are necessary and have them constructed after the fact. Often these after-the-fact additions are constructed without a permit and do not meet the requirements olthe City Code, which can lead to the city having to take enforcement actions. Staffis proposing amending the Code to require applicants to include these features in order to give staff the ability to require the revision of projects that have a high potential of causing future problems. Sec. 20-905. - Single-family dwellings. This section lists the city's minimum standards for detached single-family dwellings. Sec. 20-908. - Yard regulations. This section allows certain architectural elements to encroach specified distances within required yard setbacks and specifies what structures may be located within city easements. Issue 1: Sidewalks and walkways PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO MARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX I47 .CHANHASSEN . I'4INNESOTA 55317 TI 0 lY fl[S DATE: ISSUE SUMMARY RELEVANT CITY CODE ANALYSIS Planning Commission Sidewalks and Concrete Pads November 19,2019 Page 2 Homes typically feature an improved surface connecting the driveway to front entryway. These walkways provide easy and safe access to the home and also help keep the interior ofa house clean by reducing the amount ofdirt brought in from crossing the yard. An entry walkway is a basic amenity that is either constructed along with the home or added soon after the house is complete. Over the last year, there have been a few instances where builders or homeowners have proposed omitting or removing the entr)$/ay in order to get under the property's lot cover limits. These proposals, while permitted by the City Code, create long-term issues for future property owners. ln the case ofnew construction, the new owners typically try to install the sidewalk immediately after purchasing the home. When they consult with the city, they are surprised and frustrated to discover that the property cannot accommodate a simple paved walkway. There have also been instances where landscapers have installed the sidewalk at the puchaser's request without pulling a permit and the Foperty cannot pass its as-built inspection due to being over its permitted lot cover. For older homes where applicants propose removing existing sidewalks to free up lot cover for a different project, there have been cases where the segments have been subsequently replaced or were simply not removed. In both ofthese situations, after-the-fact enforcement and compliance are problematic, and homeowners are understandably frustrated to discover that their home cannot have a common sense feature. Historically, the city had a similar issue with patios where builders would install patio doors but not leave sufficient lot cover available to provide for the installation ofa patio. In 2006, the city addressed this problem by adopting Ordinance 423, which requires builders to show a ten-foot-by- ten-foot future patio outside of access doors not connected to a sidewalk or stoop. While there are still issues with homeowners wishing for a larger patio area than can be accommodated, this has given the city the ability to require builders to provide for a functional patio area outside of patio doors. This provision has resulted in significantly fewer issues caused by homeowners not having reasonable use oftheir property due to builders constructing homes that utilize the entirety ofthe property's available lot cover. Issue 2: Landings Exterior doors and stairs, such as those providing access from the ground to a deck or porch, typically feature a small concrete landing. These landings help provide safe access to the doors and stairs by preventing frequent travel from wearing divots in the lawn. Landings are typically small enough that they do not create lot coverage issues; however, problems can arise when the door or stairs are located directly adjacent to drainage and utilities easements. ) Staffbelieves that a similar provision would help address the issues that can arise when builders and owners try to maximize building size by removing or severely reducing the size of entryway sidewalks. It is significantly easier to prevent lot cover issues fiom being created during the building phase than it is to correct them after the house has been built and concrete has been poured. Staff is recommending that a four-foot walkway be required to connect the main entrance to the driveway. Planning Commission Sidewalks and Concrete Pads November 19,2019 Page 3 This is not generally an issue for doors that are part ofa principal structure within zoning districts with l0-foot side yard setbacks, since the typical side yard drainage and utility easement is only five feet. However, the Residential Low and Medium Density District and some Planned Unit Developments allow for 5-foot side yard setbacks along a home's garage side. Additionally, the city's yard regulations allow uncovered stairs and landings to project up to six feet into required setbacks. Problems can arise when deck stairs are oriented to terminate right at the start of easements or when access doors are located immediately adjacent to easements. In these cases, encroachment agreements cannot always be issued for the installation of landings. Staff has observed that when the installation of a landing is problematic, builders typically choose to remove the landing from the proposed project; however, these features are often installed as part of subsequent landscaping efforts without a permit. The installation of landings without encroachment agreements or in places where encroachment agreements would not have been issued can create issues for the city when it needs to utilize its easements. Cunently, staff does not have the ability to require revisions to proposed access and stair locations that have a high potential to create future problems. Staff would prefer to be able to require buildings and stairs to be configured to accommodate the inevitable addition ofa landing rather than attempt to conduct after-the-fact enforcement actions. Staff is recommending that landings with a minimum depth of three feet be shown running the width of stairs and access doors. ALTERNATIVES l) Do nothing. Most homes include these features, and the lot cover amounts are typically small enough that most properties can accommodate their addition. 2) Amend Sec. 20-905 to require new detached single-family homes to include sidewalks, and pads for stairs, landings, and access doors other than those fiom a dwelling to the outdoors. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Altemative 2. The proposed amendment would read as follows: Sec. 20-905. - Single-farnily dwellings. All single-family detached homes shall: ( I ) Be constructed upon a continuous perimeter foundation that meets the requirements of the state Building code. (2) Conform to the following standards for living areas: a. Ifa one-story rambler design, have an area of960 square feet. 3 Planning Commission Sidewalks and Concrete Pads November 19,2019 Page 4 b. tfa split level design, have an area of 1,050 square feet. c. Ifa split foyer and two-story desigr, have an area of600 square feet on the first floor. d. A two-car garage must be provided with the single-family structure. (3) Have an earth covered, composition, shingled or tiled roof or other materials approved by the Minnesota State Building Code as adopted and amended by the city. (4) Receive a building permit. The application for a building permit in addition to other information required shall indicate the height, size, design and the appearance ofall elevations ofthe proposed building and a description ofthe construction materials proposed to be used. (5) Meet the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code, as adopted and amended by the city or the applicable manufactured housing code. (6) Where access doors are proposed from a dwelling to the outdoors, which does not connect directly to a sidewalk or stoop, a minimum ten-feet-by-ten-feet area ofpatio shall be assumed. This patio area must be shown to comply with required property line, lake and wetland setbacks; may not encroach into conservation or drainage and utility easements; and shall not bring the site's lot coverage above that permitted by ordinance. (7) Where the main entrance does not connect directly to the driveway, a walkway at least four feet in width connecting the driveway and main entrance shall be assumed. This walkruay must be shown to comply with required property line, lake and wetland setbacks; may not encroach into conservation or drainage and utility easements; and shall not bring the site's lot coverlge above that permitted by ordinance. (8) A landing not less than three feet deep shall be shown running the width ofany exterior stairs or proposed access door, unless a ten-feet-by-ten-feet patio area is instead required by section 20-905(6). This landing must be shown to comply with required property line, lake and wetland setbacks; may not encroach into conservation or drainage and utility easements; and shall not bring the site's lot coverage above that permitted by ordinance. G:\PLAN\City CodePOlguolg-05 Various\Sidewalks and pads\Sidewalks and Pads lssue Paper.docx + PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Airport Zoning Standards Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.9. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 of the City Code concerning establishing an Airport Zoning Overlay District. SUMMARY OF REQUEST A portion of the City of Chanhassen is located within the Flying Cloud Airport’s Airspace Zoning Limit. Structures and trees within this area are subject to the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance’s provisions limiting the maximum height of structures and trees within the airspace zoning limit and requiring airport zoning permits for the construction of structures above a certain height within the airspace zoning limit. The Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance lists the City of Chanhassen as the party responsible for administering and enforcing its provisions within the city’s municipal boundaries. In order to fulfill this responsibility, the city must adopt the provisions of the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance as part of its City Code. Staff believes that the most efficient way to do this is to establish an Airport Zoning Overlay District, and adopt the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance by reference as additional standards for properties within the overlay district. Staff believes this will have a minimal impact on the city. BACKGROUND The Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board, upon which the City of Chanhassen had appointed representatives, has been working for the last eight years on developing and adopting an Airport Zoning Ordinance. On April 10, 2019, the Board adopted the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance that went into effect on May 1, 2019. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city establish an Airport Zoning Overlay District and adopt the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Adopt Airport Zoning StandardsSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.9.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment toChapter 20 of the City Code concerning establishing an Airport Zoning Overlay District.SUMMARY OF REQUESTA portion of the City of Chanhassen is located within the Flying Cloud Airport’s Airspace Zoning Limit. Structures andtrees within this area are subject to the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance’s provisions limiting the maximum heightof structures and trees within the airspace zoning limit and requiring airport zoning permits for the construction ofstructures above a certain height within the airspace zoning limit. The Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance lists theCity of Chanhassen as the party responsible for administering and enforcing its provisions within the city’s municipalboundaries. In order to fulfill this responsibility, the city must adopt the provisions of the Flying Cloud Airport ZoningOrdinance as part of its City Code. Staff believes that the most efficient way to do this is to establish an Airport ZoningOverlay District, and adopt the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance by reference as additional standards forproperties within the overlay district. Staff believes this will have a minimal impact on the city.BACKGROUNDThe Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board, upon which the City of Chanhassen had appointedrepresentatives, has been working for the last eight years on developing and adopting an Airport Zoning Ordinance. OnApril 10, 2019, the Board adopted the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance that went into effect on May 1, 2019.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the city establish an Airport Zoning Overlay District and adopt the Flying Cloud Airport ZoningOrdinance. ATTACHMENTS: Airport Zoning Issue Paper FCM Zoning Ordinance CITY OT CIIAI'IIIASSXN Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for loday and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Airport Zoning DATE: SUBJ: The City of Chanhassen is required to administer the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance, and in order to enforce this zoning ordinance. the city must adopt it into its zoning code. A portion of the City of Chanhassen is located within the Flying Cloud Airport's Airspace Zoning Limit. Structures and trees within this area are subject to the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance's provisions limiting the maximum height of stnrctures and trees within the airspace zoning limit and requiring airport zoning permits for the construction of structures above a certain height within the airspace zoning limit. The Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance lists the City of Chanhassen as the party responsible for administering and enforcing its provisions within the city's municipal boundaries. In order to fulfill this responsibility, the city must adopt the provisions of the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance as part of its City Code. Staff believes that the most efficient way to do this is to establish an Airport Zoning Overlay District and adopt the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance by reference as additional standards for properties within the overlay district. Staffbelieves this will have a minimal impact on the city. Minnesota Statues 360.063 Airport Zoning; Authority, Procedure: Allows for the creation of joint airport zoning boards in cases where t}te airport hazard area crosses county or municipal boundaries. This board has the ability to adopt, administer, and enforce airport zoning regulations. Minnesota Statues 360.069 Airport Zoning Adminisuation: Requires that airport zoning regulations provide for administration and enforcement ofthe regulations by an appropriate permirissuing agency. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO MARKET BOULEVARD .PO BOX ]4T.CHANHASSEN ' MINNESOTA 55517 ISSUE SUMMARY RELEVANT CODE Planning Commission Airport Zoning November 19,2019 Page 2 Chapter 20, Article XXX. - Towers and Antennas: Establishes maximum heights for towers and antennas within the City of Chanhassen. These are the tallest structures permitted by City Code with a maximum potential height of225 feet (ground to top ofhighest antenna), though this is capped at 105 feet in residential districts. Section 20-907 - Height regulations: Exempts certain structures from the zoning code's height limitations. The Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board, upon which the City of Chanhassen had appointed representatives, has been working for the last eight years on developing and adopting an airport zoning ordinance. On April 10, 2019, the Board adopted the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance that went into effect on May 1, 2019. FCI Zonine Ontnanc. Erhlbl O . AlrDon Bound.ry rnd Aitr[c. Zon iog Llartt! i-.--! .crl AqO u.l-] rnFo.zEr rJr 'rqrr iroz.nr r, Cl'.ahrc<a Mrmicioel Bormderv 'crr,t :ltr!|'E . "-i . BACKGROUND ANALYSIS Area of Citv within Airspace Zonins Limits o 2.f@ 6 rrd! --*-_-F..t I I : 4 [-*- -Z ( t Planning Commission Airport Zoning November 19,2019 Page 3 Only a small portion of the city adjacent to Lake Riley is located within Flying Cloud Airport's airspace zoning limits. Upon examination of the airport zoning ordinance, staff found that the most restrictive height limit placed upon a parcel within the City of Chanhassen was the requirement ofan Airport Zoning Permit for stnrctures 240 feet or higher. The tallest structure permitted by City Code outside of the Central Business District, which does not have height limits, would be a tower with a maximum height of 225 feet; however, since all of the property within the airspace zoning limits is zoned for residential use, the maximum height within that area would actually be 105 feet. Theoretically, a variance could be issued to exceed this height, but it is highly unlikely the city would consent to a variance for a structure that more than doubled its district's maximum height. Unlike the City Code, the airport zoning ordinance also regulates the maximum height oftrees. Since the tallest tree in the state of Minnesota is a 130-foot tall white spruce in Littlefork, staff does not believe that it is likely the adoption ofthe airport zoning ordinance will impact any existing or future trees within the city. Finally, it should be noted that Sec. 20-907 of the City Code exempts some struclures, such as flagpoles, and architectural features, such as church spires, from the height limitations prcsent in the Zoning Code. Since the tallest flagpole in the United States of America is 400 feet tall and the tallest church in the United States is 392 feet, it is possible, though again unlikely, that a resident could propose a 240+ flagpole or church spire that would trigger the airport zoning permit. Given the above, it is staffls beliefthat adopting the airport zoning ordinance will not in any way hinder the use or development ofthe parcels that will fall within its overlay district. 1) Amend the City Code to establish an Airport Zoning Overlay District and adopt the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance. 2) Do nothing. Staff recommends Alternative 1, which would allow the city to administer and enforce the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance. The proposed amendment would read as follows: Sec. 20-1565 - 20-1574. - Reserved. ARTICLE XXXII. AIRPORT ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec.20-1575. - Establishment of Airport Zoning Overlay District. ) ALTERNATIvES RXCOMMENDATION Planning Commission Airport Zoning November 19,2019 Page 4 The Airport Zoning Overlay District shall be applied or superimposed (overlaid) upon all zoning districts within the portions ofthe City of Chanhassen depicted as being within the area labeled as Airspace Zoning Limit by the text and map contained in Exhibit D - "Airport Boundary and Airspace Zoning Limits" of the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 20-1576. - Requirements for Airport Zoning Overlay District. All properties within the Airport Zoning Overlay District are subject to the provisions ofthe Flying Could Airport Zoning Ordinance. Sec. 20-1577. - Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance. The Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance adopted on April 10,2019 by the Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board, established pursuant to the authority conferred by Minnesota Statutes 360,061 to 360.074, is hereby adopted by reference. Sec. 20-1578 - 20-1580. - Reserved. ATTACHMENT 1) Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance g:\plan\city codeuol9U0l9{5 various\airpon zoning updaae\issue psper airpon zoning updare.docx ,l Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance Adopted April 10, 2019 Adopted by the Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board Contact Person: Flying Cloud Joint Airport Zoning Board c/o JAZB Secretary Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450 _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY .............................................................................. 1 SECTION II. TITLE AND SHORT TITLE ................................................................................. 2 SECTION III. DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION .................................................. 2 A. Definitions ................................................................................................................... 2 B. Rules Of Construction.……………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 SECTION IV. AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTION ZONING ................................................................... 6 A. Airspace Surfaces And Zones ......................................................................................... 6 B. Height Restrictions ........................................................................................................ 8 SECTION V. LAND USE SAFETY ZONING ............................................................................ 10 A. Safety Zones .............................................................................................................. 10 B. Land Use Restrictions .................................................................................................. 11 SECTION VI. AIRPORT ZONING LIMITS AND FCM ZONING MAP ........................................... 12 A. Airspace Zoning Limits ................................................................................................ 12 B. Safety Zoning Limits ................................................................................................... 13 C. FCM Zoning Map ......................................................................................................... 13 SECTION VII. NONCONFORMING USES ................................................................................ 13 A. FCM Zoning Ordinance ................................................................................................ 13 SECTION VIII. AIRPORT ZONING PERMITS ............................................................................ 13 A. Permit Required .......................................................................................................... 13 B. Exception To Permit Requirement ................................................................................ 14 C. Permit Application ....................................................................................................... 14 D. Permit Standard ......................................................................................................... 14 E. Abandoned Or Deteriorated Nonconforming Uses ......................................................... 15 SECTION IX. VARIANCES .................................................................................................... 15 A. Variance Application .................................................................................................... 15 B. Failure Of Board To Act ............................................................................................... 16 C. Variance Standard ...................................................................................................... 16 SECTION X. HAZARD MARKING AND LIGHTING ................................................................. 16 A. Nonconforming Uses ................................................................................................... 16 B. Permits And Variances ................................................................................................ 17 SECTION XI. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR .............................................................................. 17 _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page ii A. Duties ........................................................................................................................ 17 B. Designated Zoning Administrators................................................................................ 17 SECTION XII. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ................................................................................ 18 A. Establishment Of Board And Selection Of Chair ............................................................ 18 B. Board Powers ............................................................................................................. 18 C. Board Procedures ....................................................................................................... 18 SECTION XIII. APPEALS ........................................................................................................ 19 A. Who May Appeal ........................................................................................................ 19 B. Commencement Of Appeals ........................................................................................ 19 C. Stay Of Proceedings.................................................................................................... 19 D. Appeal Procedures ...................................................................................................... 20 E. Decision ..................................................................................................................... 20 SECTION XIV. JUDICIAL REVIEW .......................................................................................... 20 SECTION XV. PENALTIES AND OTHER REMEDIES ................................................................. 20 SECTION XVI. RELATION TO OTHER LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND RULES ................................. 21 A. Compliance Required .................................................................................................. 21 B. Conflicts With Other Regulations. ................................................................................ 21 C. Current Versions And Citations. ................................................................................... 21 SECTION XVII. SEVERABILITY ............................................................................................... 21 A. Effect Of Taking .......................................................................................................... 21 B. Validity Of Remaining Provisions .................................................................................. 21 SECTION XVIII. EFFECTIVE DATE ............................................................................................ 22 Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Map Airspace Zones, Index Sheet and Plates A A1 to A F6 Safety Zones, Index Sheet and Plates SZ A1 to SZ F6 Maximum Construction Heights Without Permit, Index Sheet and Plates MCH A1 to MCH F6 Exhibit A – Airport Boundary Exhibit B – JAZB Safety Zone A Exhibit C – JAZB Safety Zone B Exhibit D – Airport Boundary and Airspace Zoning Limits Exhibit E – Airport Boundary and Airspace Contours Exhibit F – Airport Boundary and Safety Zoning Limits FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 1 FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ZONING ORDINANCE ADOPTED BY THE FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT JOINT AIRPORT ZONING BOARD AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AND RESTRICTING THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES AND OBJECTS OF NATURAL GROWTH, AND OTHERWISE REGULATING THE USE OF PROPERTY, IN THE VICINITY OF THE FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT BY CREATING THE APPROPRIATE ZONES AND ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR CHANGES IN THE RESTRICTIONS AND BOUNDARIES OF SUCH ZONES; DEFINING CERTAIN TERMS; REFERRING TO THE FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ZONING MAP; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT; ESTABLISHING A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; AND IMPOSING PENALTIES. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT JOINT AIRPORT ZONING BOARD PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY CONFERRED BY MINNESOTA STATUTES §§ 360.061 – 360.074, THAT THE FLYING CLOUD AIRPORT ZONING ORDINANCE BE EFFECTIVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY The FLYING CLOUD Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board, created and established by joint action of the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Cities of Eden Prairie, Shakopee, and Chanhassen, pursuant to the provisions and authority of Minnesota Statutes § 360.063, hereby finds and declares that: A. An Airport Hazard endangers the lives and property of users of the Airport and property or occupants of land in its vicinity, and also, if of the obstructive type, in effect reduces the size of the area available for the landing, takeoff, and maneuvering of aircraft, thus tending to destroy or impair the utility of the Airport and the public investment therein. B. The creation or establishment of an Airport Hazard is a public nuisance and an injury to the region served by the Airport. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 2 C. For the protection of the public health, safety, order, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare, and for the promotion of the most appropriate use of land, it is necessary to prevent the creation or establishment of Airport Hazards. D. The social and economic costs of disrupting land uses around the Airport, however, often outweigh the benefits of a reduction in Airport Hazards requiring a balance between the social and economic costs to surrounding communities and the benefits of strict regulation. E. The prevention of these Airport Hazards should be accomplished, to the extent legally possible, by the exercise of the police power without compensation. F. Preventing the creation or establishment of Airport Hazards and eliminating, removing, altering, mitigating, or marking and lighting of existing Airport Hazards are public purposes for which political subdivisions may raise and expend public funds, levy assessments against land, and acquire land and property interests therein. SECTION II. TITLE AND SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known as the “Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance” or the “FCM Zoning Ordinance.” SECTION III. DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION A. Definitions. As used in this Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise expressly stated, or unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning, the words and phrases in the following list of definitions shall have the meanings indicated. All words and phrases not defined shall have their common meaning. 1. Airport. “Airport” means Flying Cloud Airport located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. Airport Boundary. “Airport Boundary” means the boundary shown on Exhibit A – Airport Boundary, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. Airport Hazard. “Airport Hazard” means any Structure, Tree, or use of land that obstructs the airspace required for, or is otherwise hazardous to, the flight of aircraft in landing or taking off at the Airport; and any use of land that is hazardous to Persons or property because of its proximity to the Airport. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 3 4. Airport Zoning Permit. “Airport Zoning Permit” means zoning permits as required under Section VIII. 5. Airspace Surfaces. “Airspace Surfaces” means the surfaces established in Section IV.A. 6. Airspace Zones. “Airspace Zones” means the land use zones established in Section IV.A. 7. Board of Adjustment. “Board of Adjustment” means the body established in Section XII. 8. Bluff. “Bluff” means a steep cliff, embankment, hill, or outcropping along a river or stream, with an average slope of eighteen (18) percent or greater measured over a horizontal distance of fifty (50) feet or more, and that rises at least twenty-five (25) feet above the ordinary high water mark of the river or stream. 9. Commissioner. “Commissioner” means the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation or, if either the position of Commissioner or the Minnesota Department of Transportation shall no longer exist or serve its present functions, such successor state official or officials or entity or entities as shall either singularly or collectively perform or serve such functions. 10. Effective Date. “Effective Date” means the effective date set forth in Section XVIII. 11. FAA. “FAA” means the Federal Aviation Administration or, if the Federal Aviation Administration shall no longer exist or serve its present functions, such successor federal entity or entities as shall either singularly or collectively perform or serve such functions. 12. FAA 7460 Obstruction Evaluation. Established FAA process for conducting aeronautical studies conducted under the provisions of Title 14 CFR, Part 77 (for proposed construction or alteration) or Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (for existing structures), or any successor to this process. 13. FCM Zoning Map. “FCM Zoning Map” means the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Map as defined in Section VI.C. 14. Lot. [For JAZB Ordinance: “Lot” means a designated parcel, tract, or area of land established by plat or subdivision, or otherwise permitted by law.] [For Eden Prairie _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 4 Ordinance: “Lot” means one unit of a recorded plat, subdivision, or registered land survey, or a recorded parcel described by metes and bounds.] 15. Nonconforming Use. “Nonconforming Use” means any pre-existing Structure or use of land which is inconsistent with the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance or an amendment hereto. 16. Person. “Person” means any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, company, association, joint stock association, or body politic, and includes a trustee, receiver, assignee, administrator, executor, guardian, or other representative. 17. Planned. “Planned” means proposed future Airport developments and improvements indicated on a planning document having the approval of the FAA, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Office of Aeronautics, and the Metropolitan Airports Commission. 18. Precision Instrument Runway. “Precision Instrument Runway” means a Runway having an existing instrument approach procedure utilizing an instrument landing system (ILS), or a precision approach radar (PAR), and a Runway for which a precision instrument approach procedure is Planned. 19. Runway. “Runway” means any existing or planned paved surface of the Airport which is specifically designated and used or planned to be used for the landing and/or taking off of aircraft. The individual Runways at the Airport are defined in this FCM Zoning Ordinance based on the compass heading of landing aircraft. 20. Runway 10R-28L. “Runway 10R-28L” means the 5,000-foot runway. Runway 10R is a Precision Instrument Runway and Runway 28L is a Non-precision Runway. Both the Runway 10R and 28L ends are within the City of Eden Prairie. 21. Runway 10L-28R. “Runway 10L-28R” means the 3,900-foot Non-precision Runway at the Airport whose 10L and 28R ends are within the City of Eden Prairie. 22. Runway 18-36. “Runway 18-36” means the 2,691-foot runway. Runway 18 is a Visual Runway (planned future Non-Precision) and Runway 36 is a Non-Precision Runway. Both the Runway 18 and 36 Ends are within the City of Eden Prairie. 23. Runway Protection Zone. “Runway Protection Zone” means a zone mandated by FAA regulations that is longitudinally centered on the extended centerline at each end of _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 5 Runways 10R-28L, 10L-28R, 18-36, whose inner edge is at the same width and elevation as, and coincides with, the end of the Primary Surfaces for Runway 10R; starts at a width of 500 feet for Runway 28L and 250 feet for Runways 10L-28R and 18-36; and that extends outward a horizontal distance of 1,000 feet expanding uniformly to a width of 700 feet for Runway 28L; extends outward a horizontal distance of 1,000 feet expanding uniformly to a width of 450 feet for Runways 10L-28R and 18-36; extends outward a horizontal distance of 2,500 feet expanding uniformly to a width of 1,750 feet for Runway 10R. 24. Safety Zones. “Safety Zones” means the land use zones established in Section V.A. 25. School. “School” means any private or public educational institution for people in kindergarten through grade twelve (12) and any private or public day care or pre-school facility that enrolls more than fifty (50) children. 26. Slope. “Slope” means an incline from the horizontal expressed in an arithmetic ratio of horizontal magnitude to vertical magnitude. Slope = 3:1 = 3 ft. horizontal to 1 ft. vertical 27. Structure. “Structure” means anything anchored, attached, built, constructed, erected, gathered, located, placed, or piled on the ground or in or over a water body, whether temporary or permanent, moveable or immovable, including antennae, buildings, canopies, cranes, decks, derricks, docks, edifices, equipment, fences, overhead transmission lines, patios, piers, piles, ponds, posts, roadways, signs, smokestacks, towers, utility poles, wires, and anything attached to any of the foregoing either temporarily or permanently. 28. Tree. “Tree” means any object of natural growth. 29. Zoning Administrator. “Zoning Administrator” means the public official in each affected municipality and at the Metropolitan Airports Commission as set forth in Section XI.B. B. Rules Of Construction. In the construction of this FCM Zoning Ordinance, the following rules shall be observed and applied, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 6 1. Computing Time. In computing the period of time within which an act may or must be done, the first calendar day from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday, in which case the period shall run until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. 2. Conflicts Between Ordinance Provisions. If a provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance conflicts with any other provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance, the more restrictive provision shall prevail. 3. Height. “Height” shall be expressed as elevation in feet above Mean Sea Level, North American Vertical Datum, 1988 Adjustment, except in reference to maximum construction height without an Airport Zoning Permit when it shall be expressed as distance in feet above curb level or above natural grade, as the context and Section VIII.B.1. require, or as distance in feet above ground shown on the Maximum Construction Heights Without Permit Plates in the FCM Zoning Map. 4. Including, Not Limited To. The word “including” means including but not limited to. 5. Land To Include Water Surfaces And Bodies. The word “land” shall include water bodies and surfaces for the purpose of establishing Airspace Zones and Safety Zones. 6. May, Permissive. The word “may” is permissive. 7. Shall, Mandatory. The word “shall” is mandatory and not discretionary. 8. Singular And Plural. The singular shall include the plural, and the plural the singular. 9. Tense. The present tense shall include the future. SECTION IV. AIRSPACE OBSTRUCTION ZONING A. Airspace Surfaces And Zones. In order to carry out the purpose of this FCM Zoning Ordinance as set forth in Section I., the following Airspace Surfaces and Airspace Zones are hereby established, subject to the airspace zoning limits in Section VI.A. 1. Primary Surface. An imaginary surface longitudinally centered on each Runway extending two hundred (200) feet beyond each end of Runways 10L-28R, 10R-28L, 18- 36, and having a width of five hundred (500) feet for Runways 10L-28R and 18-36 and _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 7 one thousand (1,000) feet for Runway 10R-28L. The elevation of any point on the Primary Surface is the same as the elevation of the nearest point on the Runway centerline. 2. Primary Zone. All that land which lies directly under a Primary Surface. 3. Horizontal Surface. An imaginary surface that is one thousand fifty-six (1,056) feet above mean sea level, the perimeter of which is constructed by swinging arcs of specified radii from the center of each end of the Primary Surface of each Runway and connecting the adjacent arcs by lines tangent to those arcs. The radius of each arc is five thousand (5,000) feet for Runways 18-36 and 10L-28R and ten thousand (10,000) feet for Runways 10R-28L. 4. Horizontal Zone. All that land which lies directly under the Horizontal Surface. 5. Conical Surface. An imaginary surface extending upward and outward from the periphery of the Horizontal Surface at a Slope of twenty (20) to one (1) for a horizontal distance of four thousand (4,000) feet as measured radially outward from the periphery of the Horizontal Surface. 6. Conical Zone. All that land which lies directly under the Conical Surface. 7. Precision Instrument Approach Surface. An imaginary surface longitudinally centered on the extended centerline at the end of Runway 10R. The inner edge of this surface is at the same width and elevation as, and coincides with, the end of the Primary Surface. This surface inclines upward and outward at a Slope of fifty (50) to one (1) for a horizontal distance of ten thousand (10,000) feet expanding uniformly to a width of four thousand (4,000) feet, then continues upward and outward for an additional horizontal distance of forty thousand (40,000) feet at a Slope of forty (40) to one (1) expanding uniformly to an ultimate width of sixteen thousand (16,000) feet. 8. Precision Instrument Approach Zone. All that land which lies directly under a Precision Instrument Approach Surface. 9. Approach Surface. An imaginary surface longitudinally centered on the extended centerline at each end of Runways 10L-28R, 28L and 18-36. The inner edge of this surface is at the same width and elevation as, and coincides with, the end of the Primary Surface. For Runway 28L, this surface inclines upward and outward at a Slope _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 8 of thirty-four (34) to one (1) for a horizontal distance of ten thousand (10,000) feet expanding uniformly to a width of three thousand five hundred (3,500) feet. For Runways 10L-28R and 18-36, this surface inclines upward and outward at a Slope of twenty (20) to one (1) for a horizontal distance of five thousand (5,000) feet expanding uniformly to a width of two thousand (2,000) feet. 10. Approach Zone. All that land which lies directly under an Approach Surface. 11. Transitional Surface. An imaginary surface extending upward and outward at right angles to the centerline and extended centerline of Runways 10L-28R, 10R-28L, 18-36 at a Slope of seven (7) to one (1) from both sides of each Primary Surface and from both sides of each Precision Instrument Approach Surface for 10R and the Approach Surfaces of 10L-28R, 28L, and 18-36 until it intersects the Horizontal Surface or the Conical Surface. 12. Transitional Zone. All that land which lies directly under a Transitional Surface. B. Height Restrictions. Except as otherwise provided in this FCM Zoning Ordinance, and except as necessary and incidental to Airport operations, the following height restrictions shall apply. Where a Lot is beneath more than one Airspace Surface, the height of the more restrictive (lower) Airspace Surface shall control. 1. Structures. No new Structure shall be constructed or established; and no existing Structure shall be altered, changed, rebuilt, repaired, or replaced in any Airspace Zone so as to project above any Airspace Surface. Nor shall any equipment used to accomplish any of the foregoing activities be allowed to project above any Airspace Surface. 2. Trees. No Tree shall be allowed to grow or be altered, repaired, replaced, or replanted in any Airspace Zone so as to project above any Airspace Surface. Nor shall any equipment used to accomplish any of the foregoing activities be allowed to project above any Airspace Surface. a. Public Nuisance; Order. If the whole or any part of any Tree shall be determined to be an Airport Hazard by the FAA, or any successor entity, after proper investigation, the Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Executive Director or his designee may issue an order in writing for the owner or owners, agent or occupant _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 9 of the property upon which such hazardous tree is located, to forthwith cause such hazardous tree, or portion thereof if the removal of a portion will remove the hazard, to be taken down and removed. b. Notice. Said order is to be mailed to the last known address of the owner, agent or occupant and shall be accompanied by a notice setting forth said Executive Director’s authority to remove such hazardous Tree at such owner’s, agent’s or occupant’s expense in the event such owner, agent or occupant fails to comply with or file a notice of appeal from said order within ten (10) days of mailing. The notice shall include instructions for filing a notice of appeal from said order. c. Removal. If within ten (10) days after said order has been mailed, as above provided for, the owner or owners, agent or occupant of the property upon which such hazardous Tree is located neglects or refuses to comply with said order, or has failed to file a notice of appeal from said order with said Executive Director, then said Executive Director or his designee(s) may enter upon said premises and take down or remove said tree or portion thereof declared to be hazardous, and to do any and all things which in his opinion may be necessary for the protection of life, limb or property. d. Assessment of Expense. If, after the notice hereinbefore provided for has been given, the owner, agent or occupant has failed to remove such hazardous tree or portion thereof, and it becomes necessary for the Metropolitan Airports Commission to remove same, said Executive Director or his designee shall mail a statement of the expense of such removal to the owner, agent or occupant of the property from which such tree or portion thereof has been removed, and if within thirty (30) days therefrom the owner, agent or occupant has not remitted to the Commission for the expense incurred by the Commission in said removal, the Executive Director or his designee may forthwith recover the amount of such expense from the owner or owners of said property in any civil court of competent jurisdiction, in the manner provided by law. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 10 SECTION V. LAND USE SAFETY ZONING A. Safety Zones. In order to carry out the purpose of this FCM Zoning Ordinance, as set forth in Section I., the following Safety Zones are hereby established, subject to the safety zoning limits in Section VI.B. 1. Safety Zone A. Designated land, the extents of which are shown in Exhibit B, within that portion of the Precision Instrument Approach Zone of Runway 10R and the Approach Zones of 10L-28R, 18-36, and 28L, beginning at, and coinciding with, the end of the Primary Surfaces for Runway 10R; and that starts at a width of 1,000 feet and extends outward a horizontal distance of 3,333 feet expanding uniformly to a width of 2,000 feet for Runway 28L; and that starts at a width of 1,000 feet extends outward a horizontal distance of 3,333 feet expanding uniformly to a width of 2,000 feet for Runway 10R; and that starts at a width of 500 feet and extends outward a horizontal distance of 2,600 feet expanding uniformly to a width of 1,280 feet for Runways 10L- 28R; and that starts at a width of 500 feet and extends outward a horizontal distance of 1,793 feet expanding uniformly to a width of 1,038 feet for Runways 18-36. Safety Zone A overlies the Runway Protection Zones. 2. Safety Zone B. Designated land, the extents of which are shown in Exhibit C, within that portion of the Precision Instrument Approach Zone of Runway 10R and Approach Zone of Runway 28L beginning at and coinciding with the Primary Surface of the Runway at a width of 1,000 feet, extending outward a distance of five thousand (5,000) feet and expanding uniformly to an ultimate width of two thousand five hundred (2,500) feet, less the area encompassing Safety Zone A; and designated land in that portion of the Approach Zone of Runway 10L-28R beginning at and coinciding with the Primary Surface of the Runway at a width of 500 feet, extending outward a distance of three thousand nine hundred (3,900) feet and expanding uniformly to an ultimate width of one thousand six hundred seventy (1,670) feet less the area encompassing Safety Zone A; and designated land in that portion of the Approach Zone of Runways 18-36 beginning at and coinciding with the end of the Primary Surface of the Runway at a width of 500 feet, extending outward a distance of two thousand six-hundred ninety one (2,691) feet and expanding uniformly to an ultimate width of one thousand three hundred seven (1,307) feet less the area encompassing Safety Zone A. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 11 3. Safety Zone C. All land enclosed within the perimeter of the Horizontal Zone, except that land within Safety Zone A and Safety Zone B. B. Land Use Restrictions. 1. General Restrictions. Subject at all times to the height restrictions set forth in Section IV.B., no use shall be made of any land in any of the Safety Zones that creates or causes interference with the operations of radio or electronic facilities on the Airport or with radio or electronic communications between Airport and aircraft, makes it difficult for pilots to distinguish between Airport lights and other lights, results in glare in the eyes of pilots using the Airport, impairs visibility in the vicinity of the Airport, is deemed a “hazard” to air navigation by FAA or MNDOT as part of an FAA 7460 Obstruction Evaluation, or otherwise endangers the landing, taking off, or maneuvering of aircraft. 2. Safety Zone A Restrictions. Subject at all times to the height restrictions set forth in Section IV.B. and to the general restrictions contained in Section V.B.1., areas designated as Safety Zone A for each end of Runways 10R-28L, 10L-28R, 18-36 shall contain no buildings, temporary structures, exposed transmission lines, or other similar land use structural hazards, and shall be restricted to those uses which will not create, attract, or bring together an assembly of persons thereon. Permitted uses may include, but are not limited to, such uses as agriculture (seasonal crops), horticulture, raising of livestock, animal husbandry, wildlife habitat, light outdoor recreation (non-spectator), cemeteries, and auto parking. Where Safety Zone A overlies the Runway Protection Zone, land uses and Structures within the Runway Protection Zone will be governed by Federal laws and regulations or by FAA advisory circulars, orders, or guidance. 3. Safety Zone B Restrictions. Subject at all times to the height restrictions in Section IV.B. and to the general restrictions in Section V.B.1., areas designated as Safety Zone B shall be restricted in use as follows: Each use shall be on a site whose area shall not be less than three acres. Each use shall not create, attract, or bring together a site population that would exceed 15 times that of the site acreage. Each site shall have no more than one building plot upon which any number of Structures may be erected. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 12 A building plot shall be single, uniform, and non-contrived area, whose shape is uncomplicated and whose area shall not exceed the following minimum ratios with respect to the total site area: The following uses are specifically prohibited in Safety Zone B: churches, hospitals, Schools, theaters, stadiums, hotels and motels, trailer courts, camp grounds, and other places of public or semipublic assembly, and ponds or other uses that might attract waterfowl or other birds such as putrescible waste disposal operations, wastewater treatment facilities and associated settling ponds, and dredge spoil containment areas; provided, however, the prohibition on ponds or other uses that might attract waterfowl or other birds shall not apply to areas below an elevation of eight hundred sixty five (865) feet above mean sea level along any Bluff of the Minnesota River. 4. Safety Zone C Restrictions. No land use in Safety Zone C shall violate the height restrictions set forth in Section IV.B. or the general restrictions contained in Section V.B.1. SECTION VI. AIRPORT ZONING LIMITS AND FCM ZONING MAP A. Airspace Zoning Limits. No Airspace Zone shall extend more than two miles from the Airport Boundary under the Precision Instrument Approach Surfaces or more than one and one-half miles from the Airport Boundary outside the Precision Instrument Approach Surfaces. Exhibit D – Airport Boundary and Airspace Zoning Limits and Exhibit E – Airport Boundary and Airspace Contours, attached hereto and made a part hereof, show these limits. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 13 B. Safety Zoning Limits. The Safety Zoning Limits shall not extend beyond one (1) mile from the airport boundary. Safety Zone B will define the extent of the zoning limits in areas where Safety Zone B extends beyond one (1) mile from the airport boundary. Exhibit F – Airport Boundary and Safety Zoning Limits, attached hereto and made a part hereof, shows these limits. C. FCM Zoning Map. The locations and boundaries of the Airspace Surfaces, Airspace Zones, Safety Zones, and the Maximum Construction Heights without an Airport Zoning Permit established by this FCM Zoning Ordinance are set forth on the Flying Cloud Airport Zoning Map consisting of one-hundred and two (102) plates – Airspace Zones, Plates A-A1 to A-F6; Safety Zones, Plates SZ-A1 to SZ-F6; and Maximum Construction Heights Without Permit, Plates MCH-A1 to MCH-F6 prepared by the Metropolitan Airports Commission, attached hereto and made a part hereof. These plates, together with such amendments thereto as may from time to time be made, and all notations, references, elevations, heights, data, surface and zone boundaries, and other information thereon, shall be and the same are hereby adopted as part of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. SECTION VII. NONCONFORMING USES A. FCM Zoning Ordinance. The provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance shall not be construed to require the removal, lowering, other change, or alteration of any Structure, or otherwise interfere with the continuance of any Nonconforming Use in existence but not conforming to the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance on the Effective Date. Nothing herein contained shall require any change in the construction, alteration, or intended use of any Structure, the construction or alteration of which was begun prior to the Effective Date, and was diligently prosecuted and completed within two (2) years of the Effective Date. SECTION VIII. AIRPORT ZONING PERMITS A. Permit Required. The following activities shall not take place on a Lot in any Airspace Zone or Safety Zone unless an Airport Zoning Permit shall have been granted therefore by the Zoning Administrator for the jurisdiction in which the Lot is located. 1. Existing Structures. Except as specifically provided in Section VIII.B., no existing Structure shall be altered, changed, rebuilt, repaired, or replaced. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 14 2. New Structures. Except as specifically provided in Section VIII.B., no Structure shall be newly constructed or otherwise established. 3. Nonconforming Structures. No nonconforming Structure shall be altered, changed, rebuilt, repaired, or replaced. 5. Nonconforming Use. No Nonconforming Use shall be changed or converted to another Nonconforming Use. B. Exception To Permit Requirement. 1. Maximum Construction Height Without A Permit. No Airport Zoning Permit shall be required for an existing Structure to be altered, changed, rebuilt, repaired, or replaced on a Lot or for a new Structure to be constructed or otherwise established on a Lot, if the highest point on the Structure or on any equipment used to accomplish any of the foregoing activities, whichever is higher, measured in feet from curb level or from natural grade at a point ten (10) feet away from the front center of the Structure, whichever is lower, does not exceed the maximum construction height above ground without an Airport Zoning Permit shown for the Lot on the applicable Maximum Construction Heights Without Permit Plate in the FCM Zoning Map. The permitting process will require an FAA 7460 Obstruction Evaluation for all structures with proposed heights in excess of the maximum allowable construction height without a permit. 2. No Violation Of Height Or Land Use Restriction Permitted. Nothing in this Section VIII.B. shall be construed as permitting or intending to permit a violation or a greater violation of any provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. C. Permit Application. An Airport Zoning Permit application for activities on a Lot shall be made in the manner and on the form established by the Zoning Administrator of the jurisdiction in which the Lot is located as designated in Section XI.B. D. Permit Standard. An Airport Zoning Permit shall be granted unless the Zoning Administrator determines that granting the permit (1) would allow a conforming Structure or use to violate any provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance or (2) would permit a nonconforming Structure or a Nonconforming Use to become a greater violation of any provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. Any Airport Zoning Permit granted may be granted subject to any reasonable conditions that the Zoning Administrator may deem necessary to _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 15 effectuate the purpose of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. In making any determination, the Zoning Administrator need not give public notice of, or hold a public hearing on, the Airport Zoning Permit application or the determination. E. Abandoned Or Deteriorated Nonconforming Uses. Whenever a Zoning Administrator determines that a nonconforming Structure has been abandoned or more than eighty percent (80%) torn down, deteriorated, or decayed, no Airport Zoning Permit shall be granted that would allow such Structure to exceed the height restrictions of Section IV.B. or otherwise violate any provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. Whether application is made for an Airport Zoning Permit or not, a Zoning Administrator may order the owner of a nonconforming Structure, at the owner’s expense, to lower, remove, reconstruct, or equip the same in the manner necessary to conform to the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. Prior to issuing such an order, the city Zoning Administrator shall consult with the Metropolitan Airports Commission and obtain its consent to the proposed order. Further, prior to the issuance of any such order, the affected City and the Metropolitan Airports Commission shall enter into an agreement as to which party is responsible for issuance and enforcement of the order. In the event the owner of the nonconforming Structure shall neglect or refuse to comply with such order for ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such order, the Zoning Administrator may, by appropriate legal action, proceed to have the nonconforming Structure lowered, removed, reconstructed, or equipped and assess the cost and expense thereof against the land on which the Structure is, or was, located. Unless such an assessment is paid within ninety (90) days from the service of notice thereof on the owner of the land, the sum shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from the date the cost and expense is incurred until paid, and shall be collected in the same manner as are general taxes, all as authorized by Minnesota Statutes § 360.067. SECTION IX. VARIANCES A. Variance Application. Any Person desiring to construct or establish a new Structure; to alter, change, rebuild, repair, or replace an existing Structure, to allow a Tree to grow higher; to alter, repair, replace, or replant a Tree, or to use his or her property in violation of any provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance may apply to the Board of Adjustment for a variance from such provision. A variance application shall be made by sending the application on the _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 16 form provided by the Board of Adjustment by certified United States Mail to (1) the members of the Board of Adjustment and (2) the Board of Adjustment at the mailing address specified in Section XII.C. The applicant shall also mail a copy of the application by regular United States Mail to the Zoning Administrator of the jurisdiction in which the Structure or property is located, as designated in Section XI.B. The Board of Adjustment may charge a fee for processing the application. B. Failure Of Board To Act. If the Board of Adjustment fails to grant or deny the variance within four (4) months after the last Board member receives the variance application, the variance shall be deemed to be granted by the Board of Adjustment, but not yet effective. When the variance is granted by reason of the failure of the Board of Adjustment to act on the variance, the Person receiving the variance shall send notice that the variance has been granted by certified United States Mail to (1) the Board of Adjustment at the mailing address specified in Section XII.C. and (2) the Commissioner. The applicant shall include a copy of the original application for the variance with the notice to the Commissioner. The variance shall be effective sixty (60) days after this notice is received by the Commissioner, subject to any action taken by the Commissioner pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 360.063, subd. 6.a. C. Variance Standard. A variance shall be granted where it is found that a literal application or enforcement of the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship and relief granted would not be contrary to the public interest but do substantial justice and be in accordance with the spirit of this FCM Zoning Ordinance and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 360. Any variance granted may be granted subject to any reasonable conditions that the Board of Adjustment, or the Commissioner acting under Section IX.B., may deem necessary to effectuate the purpose of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. SECTION X. HAZARD MARKING AND LIGHTING A. Nonconforming Uses. The Metropolitan Airports Commission may require the owner of any nonconforming Structure to permit the installation, operation, and maintenance thereon of such markers and lights as shall be deemed necessary by the Metropolitan Airports Commission to indicate to the operators of aircraft in the vicinity of the Airport the presence _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 17 of such Airport Hazards. Such markers and lights shall be installed, operated, and maintained at the expense of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. B. Permits And Variances. Any Airport Zoning Permit or variance granted by a Zoning Administrator or the Board of Adjustment may, if such action is deemed advisable to effectuate the purpose of this FCM Zoning Ordinance and be reasonable in the circumstances, be granted subject to a condition that the owner of the Structure in q uestion, at the owner’s expense, install, operate, and maintain thereon such markers and lights as may be necessary to indicate to pilots the presence of an Airport Hazard. SECTION XI. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR A. Duties. It shall be the duty of each Zoning Administrator to administer and enforce the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. Applications for Airport Zoning Permits shall be made to a Zoning Administrator as provided herein. A Zoning Administrator may charge a fee for processing the application. Airport Zoning Permit applications shall be considered and acted upon by the Zoning Administrator in accordance with the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance and within the timelines established by Minnesota Statutes § 15.99, as it may be amended. The Zoning Administrator shall remind each applicant that it is the responsibility of the applicant to record any conditions of an Airport Zoning Permit, if required by law. B. Designated Zoning Administrators. For the purpose of this FCM Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Administrator shall be the official entitled as follows: the Eden Prairie Zoning Administrator for lands located in the City of Eden Prairie; the Shakopee Zoning Administrator for lands located in the City of Shakopee; and the Chanhassen Zoning Administrator for lands located in the City of Chanhassen. In the event that one (1) or more of the above described Zoning Administrators does not administer this FCM Zoning Ordinance, the Flying Cloud Airport Joint Airport Zoning Board hereby appoints the Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, (or his or her designee) to administer this FCM Zoning Ordinance in the municipality or municipalities. If any official position designated above as a Zoning Administrator ceases to exist or to perform or serve its present function, the successor position as designated by the applicable entity shall become the Zoning Administrator for that entity and shall perform or serve such functions. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 18 SECTION XII. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT A. Establishment Of Board And Selection Of Chair. There is hereby established a Board of Adjustment that shall consist of five (5) members appointed by the Metropolitan Airports Commission, and each shall serve for a term of three (3) years and until a successor is duly appointed and qualified. Of the members first appointed, one (1) shall be appointed for a term of one (1) year, two (2) for a term of two (2) years, and two (2) for a term of three (3) years. Upon their appointment, the members shall select a chair to act at the pleasure of the Board of Adjustment. Members shall be removable by the Metropolitan Airports Commission for cause, upon written charges, after a public hearing. B. Board Powers. The Board of Adjustment shall have the power to hear and decide appeals from any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by any Zoning Administrator or the Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Executive Director in the enforcement of this FCM Zoning Ordinance and to hear and grant or deny variances. C. Board Procedures. 1. Rules, Meetings, And Records. The Board of Adjustment shall adopt rules for its governance and procedure in harmony with the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance. Meetings of the Board of Adjustment shall be held at the call of the chair and at such other times as the Board of Adjustment may determine. The chair, or in his or her absence the acting chair, may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses. All hearings of the Board of Adjustment shall be public. The Board of Adjustment shall keep minutes of its proceedings showing the vote of each member upon each question or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating such fact, and shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall immediately be filed in the offices of the Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, and the Zoning Administrator of the jurisdiction in which the affected Structure or Lot is located. 2. Written Findings And Conclusions. The Board of Adjustment shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law giving the facts upon which it acted and its legal conclusions from such facts in affirming, modifying, or reversing an order, requirement, decision, or determination of a Zoning Administrator or the Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Executive Director and in granting or denying a variance. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 19 3. Majority Vote Required. The concurring vote of a majority of the members of the Board of Adjustment shall be sufficient to affirm, modify, or reverse an order, requirement, decision, or determination of a Zoning Administrator or the Metropolitan Airports Commission’s Executive Director, to decide to grant or deny a variance, or to act on any other matter upon which the Board of Adjustment is required to pass under this FCM Zoning Ordinance. 4. Mailing Address. The mailing address for the Board of Adjustment is: FCM Zoning Ordinance Board of Adjustment c/o Executive Director Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 SECTION XIII. APPEALS A. Who May Appeal. Any Person aggrieved, or any taxpayer affected by any order, requirement, decision, or determination of a Zoning Administrator made in administration of this FCM Zoning Ordinance may appeal to the Board of Adjustment. Such appeals may also be made by any governing body of a municipality or county, or any joint airport zoning board, which is of the opinion that an order, requirement, decision, or determination of a Zoning Administrator is an improper application of this FCM Zoning Ordinance as it concerns such governing body or board. B. Commencement Of Appeals. All appeals hereunder must be commenced within thirty (30) days of a Zoning Administrator’s decision by filing with the Zoning Administrator a notice of appeal specifying the grounds thereof. The Zoning Administrator shall forthwith transmit to the Board of Adjustment the notice of appeal and all papers constituting the record upon which the order, requirement, decision, or determination appealed from was taken. C. Stay Of Proceedings. An appeal shall stay all proceedings in furtherance of the order, requirement, decision, or determination appealed from, unless the Zoning Administrator certifies to the Board of Adjustment, after the notice of appeal has been filed with it, that by reason of the facts stated in the certificate a stay would, in the Zoning Administrator’s opinion, cause imminent peril to life or property. In such case, proceedings shall not be _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 20 stayed except by order of the Board of Adjustment on notice to the Zoning Administrator and on due cause shown. D. Appeal Procedures. The Board of Adjustment shall fix a reasonable time for hearing an appeal, give public notice and due notice to the parties in interest, and decide the same within a reasonable time. At the hearing, any party may appear in Person, by agent, or by attorney. E. Decision. The Board of Adjustment may, in conformity with the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance, affirm or reverse, in whole or in part, or modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination appealed from and may make such order, requirement, decision, or determination, as may be appropriate under the circumstances and, to that end, shall have all the powers of a Zoning Administrator. SECTION XIV. JUDICIAL REVIEW Any Person aggrieved, or any taxpayer affected by, any decision of the Board of Adjustment or any action of the Commissioner, or any governing body of a municipality or county, or any joint airport zoning board, which is of the opinion that an order, requirement, decision, or determination of the Board of Adjustment or action of the Commissioner is illegal, may seek judicial review as provided in Minnesota Statutes § 360.072. The petitioner must exhaust the remedies provided in this FCM Zoning Ordinance before availing himself or herself of the right to seek judicial review as provided by this Section XIV. SECTION XV. PENALTIES AND OTHER REMEDIES Every Person who violates any provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance, any zoning approval granted hereunder, any condition of any zoning approval granted hereunder, or any order, requirement, decision, or determination of a Zoning Administrator or the Board of Adjustment shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine, imprisonment, or both of not more than the fine and imprisonment established for misdemeanors by state law. Each day a violation continues to exist shall constitute a separate offense for purpose of the penalties and remedies specified in this section. This FCM Zoning Ordinance may also be enforced through such proceedings for injunctive relief and other relief as may be proper under Minnesota Statutes § 360.073, as it may be amended, and other applicable law. _ FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 21 SECTION XVI. RELATION TO OTHER LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND RULES A. Compliance Required. In addition to the requirements of this FCM Zoning Ordinance, all Structures, Trees, and uses shall comply with all other applicable city, local, regional, state, or federal laws, regulations, and rules, including Minnesota Statutes §§ 360.81-360.91 – Regulation Of Structure Heights, Minnesota Rules 8800.1100 – Regulation Of Structure Heights, and 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 – Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. B. Conflicts With Other Regulations. Where a conflict exists between any provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance and any city, local, regional, state, or federal law, regulation, or rule applicable to the same area, whether the conflict be with respect to the height of Structures or Trees, the use of land, or any other matter, the more stringent law, regulation, or rule shall govern and prevail. C. Current Versions And Citations. All references to city, local, regional, state, and federal laws, regulations, and rules in this FCM Zoning Ordinance are intended to refer to the most current version and citation. If such references are no longer valid due to repeal or renumbering, the new laws, regulations, or rules intended to replace those cited, regardless of the citation, shall govern. SECTION XVII. SEVERABILITY A. Effect Of Taking. In any case in which the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance, although generally reasonable, are held by a court to interfere with the use or enjoyment of a particular Structure, Lot , or Tree to such an extent, or to be so onerous in their application to such a Structure, Lot, or Tree, as to constitute a taking or deprivation of that property in violation of the constitution of this state or the constitution of the United States, such holding shall not affect the application of this FCM Zoning Ordinance as to other Structures, Lots, and Trees, and, to this end, the provisions of this FCM Zoning Ordinance are declared to be severable. B. Validity Of Remaining Provisions. Should any section or provision of this FCM Zoning Ordinance be declared by the courts to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of this FCM Zoning Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the parts so declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 23 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 24 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 25 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 26 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 27 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 28 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 29 86TH ST W KATIE CIRERIE CIRLAKE DRMELI S S A C I R DREXEL CT82ND ST WHIDDEN LNDOVE CT DAKO T A A V E CROIXWOOD LN CHEYENNE AVEMI S S I O N H I L L S L N MAGENTA BAYSPRUCE TRLTI G U A C I R ERIE AVELAKE DR EMAR S H D R HIDDEN CTDAKOTA LNW Y N N F I E L D R D DEL L R D ERIN BAY 5 £¤212 11501160119011701180F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - A1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 30 TOFT CV DE L L RD L INWOOD C TDREXEL CTCURTIS LNLISMORE CIR82ND ST W BEL F A S T C V HOGAN WAYCASCADE DRIS L A N D R D DOVE CT WESTON BAY RDCIMARRON LNBELAIR LN HANOVER L N CROIXWOOD LN GEORGE MORAN DRSOUTH BAY CURV SH O R E L I N E D R ERIN BAY MILLER PKWY W STEA D I N G R D SCENIC HEIGHTS RD MILLER PKWY E £¤212 11901180117011601150106011401070113010801120111010901100F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - A2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 31 WESTON BAY R D HIL L S I D E D RSCENIC HEIGHTS RDOAK DRLINCOLN LN IS L A N D R D WALLACE RDVIEW LNBELAIR LNSCHOOL RDSOUTH BAY CURV SAND HILL CIR CANYON RDG R E D O A K D RCURTIS LNSHERIDAN LNVILLAG E W O O D S D R MORRAINE WAY MILLER PKWY E TECHNO L O G Y D R EDEN PRAIRIE RD £¤21211101100 1090 1080 1070 1060 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - A3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 32 CYPRESS LNHIL L S I D E D R OAK DR WILSON DRSARATOGA L NTAMARACK TRLRAY M O N D L N HEATHER AVETOWERS LN VILLAGE WOODS DR HI A W A T H A A V E ERWIN CT SORREL WAY MORGAN LN SCENIC HEIGHTS RD SHERIDAN LNMITCHELL RDCO R T L A N D R D CARMODY DR CHE S T N U T D R TECHNOLOGY DRAN D E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y 1070 1080 1060 1070 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - A4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 33 PRA I R I E C E N T E R D R M E D C O M B L V D 78TH S T W SHANNON CT CASTLEMOOR DR FO U N T A I N P L WILDER DRPRIMROSE LNPRESERVE BLVDCRYSTAL VIEW RDTECHNOLOGY DR CORTLAND RDMAGNOLIA TRL EDEN RDREGIONAL CENTER RD GLEN LNFRANLO RDSINGLET R E E L N COLUMBINE RDFLYING CLOUD DR1070 1060 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - A5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 34 86TH ST W LAK E V I E W R D E A V I L A C V LA K E R I L E Y T R L SPRINGFIE L D D R NICKLAUS WAYREFLECTIONS RDLYMAN BLVD SUMMERFIEL D D R RILEY LAKE RD MELR O S E C H A S SUNNYVALE D R LAKE RILEY BLVDLAKE RILEY DRBEARPATH TRL £¤212 113011901140118010601150117011601070108011701180109011901230120012101100122011101120F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - B1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 35 A V I L A C V WAVERLY CTMAYFIELD DR MCGUFFEY RDSTANLEY TRLRALEIGH LN GOULD RDDOUGLAS DRKILDA R E W A Y NICKLAUS WAY BELVEDERE DRSHEPHERD WAYKENNING RDBIG WOODS LN CANDLEWOOD PKWYNEW MARKET DRBRIARGLEN RDHANOVER LNSCENIC HEIGHTS RDTHATCHER RDWYNSTONE PASSFR E N C H C U R V ROGERS RDDANTON WAY BRAXTON DRDELL RDRILEY LAKE RD BAINBRIDGE DR BEARPATH TRLTRENTON LNPIONEER TRL £¤212 1180117011601150114011301120111011001090108010701060F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - B2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 36 GOULD RDSYLVAN RDGCOT T O N W O O D L N GATEWAY LNENDICOTT TRL MAYFIELD DRLIVINGSTON LNCEDAR R I D G E R D MCGUFFEY RDSTANLEY TRLSUNRISE CIR WSUMMIT DRKELSEY LN DOUGLAS DRMILLFORD DR SUNRISE CIR ESTARING LN WKENNING RDPALMETTO DRCAMDON HLTHATCHER RDSTARING LN ESERENITY LN COVE PO INTE RDSUTTON DRMEADOWVALE DRCORRAL LN BERGER DR RED OAK DRB O U L D E R P O I N T E R D MITCHELL RD E D E N P R A I R I E R D PIONEER TRL F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - B3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 37 LUNSKI LNSHILOH CTLANGDON PL MCCOY CT FLESHER CIR MAGNOLIA TRLBLA K E N E Y R D KNOLLWOOD DRWESTRIDGE DR SARATOGA LNT W I N L A K E S X I N G STARING LN WSTARING LA K E P K W Y WELL I N G T O N D R ESSE X C T STARING LN ECAMDON HL HILLOWAY RDVICTORIA DRQUEENS TRLHA W T H O R N E D R VILLAG E W O O D S D R CARMODY DR AN D E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y MITCHELL RD BOULDER POINTE RD 1050 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - B4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 38 FRANL O R D AZTEC DRANDERSON LAKES PKWYGRIER LNESSEX CTMA R I G O L D C I R KATHRYN CTGARDEN LN HARVARD AVE C O L U M B I N E R D ZACHMAN CIRCOLLEGE VIEW DR TUSSOCK CTDAHLIA CIRPRINCETON AVEPORC U P I N E C T STARING LAKE PKWYDA R N E L R D CROWFOOT CT HOMEWARD H ILLS RDJASMINE LNPRESERVE BLVDMAGNOLIA T R L WATERFORD CTFLYING CLOUD DR10 6 0 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - B5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 39 WESTWIND DR CENTER WAYNOR T H M A R K D R FRANLO RD GRIE R L N KATHRYN CTZACHMAN CIRWINDROW DR WATERFORD CT LAKE F A L L D R FLYWAY CIRBLACK MAPLE DRRI D G E W I N D R D BASSWOOD RDBENTWOOD DRNEILL LAKE RDPRESERVE BLVDHIDDEN OAKS DRAND E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 9 0 1 0 8 0 1 0 7 0 10 6 0 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - B6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 40 DELL DRRILEY LAKE RDDANE DRKIOWA TRLLAKE RILEY BLVDEASTWOOD CT HIGHVIEW DRLAKELAND TERSUNNYVALE D R MEADOWLARK LNCR E S T W O O D T E R FOX F O R D R D PIONEER TRL11301190114011801150117011601230122012101200119011801170 1120111011001090108010701060F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - C1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 41 !!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ALTO WAY DELL DR STRATUS CT VALLEY RD ALCOVE CIRSTABLE PATH STI R R U P L N RILEY LAKE RDCOLE CT SKY LNHACKBERRY CT PRESTON PLJONA THAN LN LAFORET DR MACINTOSH RD BRAXTON DRCEDARCREST DRBRIARGLEN RDINGRAM WAY ROGERS RD GEISLER RD CRESTWOOD TER D E L L R D FRONDELL CTDANE DR FRUITWOO D L N SADDLE HORN CTCEDAR FOREST RDTILIA RDG SHETLAND RDBRECKENRIDGE LNHA R A L S O N D R CIRRUS WAYMARSHALL RDBEARPATH TRLPIONEER TRL98099011001000101010901020103010501040108010701060F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - C2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 42 !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !MITCHELL RDSUNRISE CIR E STI R R U P L N LA RIVIER CTRIDGE R D STARING LN ESERENITY LN SADDLE HORN CTSHETLAND RDGATEWAY LN CIRRUS WAY VALLEY RD HILLTOP RD PIONEE R T R LEDEN PRAIRIE RDSP R I N G R D 930 950 920 910 940 900 1020 1030 1010980 970 1000 10509901040 960 1030 1020 1010 1000 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - C3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 43 !!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RIDGE R D STARING LN ESTARING LAKE PKWYPIONEER T R L 950900105096010401030940930920910102098010109709901000900 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - C4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 44 !!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! ! !!! ! ! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !COLD S TREAM LN CAR T W A Y C U R V GE R M A I N E T E R WOODRIDGE DRSURREY ST COLLEGE VIEW DR YORKSHIRE LNPAINTERS RDGP O R T A L D R HARVEST LN M O U N T C U R V E R D CREEKWOOD DR PRINC E T O N A V E CREEK KNOLL RDLARKSPUR LNOL Y M P I A D RWE L T E R S W A Y SUNNYBROOK RD HOMEWARD HILLS RDFLYING CLOUD DRPIONEER TRL 950 1010 1000990960 980 970940930 9201020 1030 1040 1050 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - C5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 45 WELTERS WAY AMESBURY LNTARN C I R SUMAC CIR HAR V E S T L N FOX R U N C I R LEAFTOP CIRPAINTERS RDGBENNETT PLSUNNY B R O O K R D GE R M A I N E T E R FRANLO RDTALUS CIRLAUREL DRAM S D E N W A Y CLUBHOUSE RDOL Y M P I A D R OVERLOOK TRLEN T R E V A U X D R MOUNT C U R V E R D PIO N E E R T R L 1150114011301120111011001090108010701060F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - C6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 46 TRAILS END RDLAKOTA LN SIERRA TRLEXPLORER TRLFOXFORD RD OVERLAND TRLVOGEL FARM TRLPATHFINDER DR FARMSTEAD CIR DEERBROOK DRPIONEER TRL FLYING CLOUD D R 10601190107011801170116011501140113011201110110010901080F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - D1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 47 !!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! J O N A T H A N L N DELL RDTURNBULL RD P A T H F I N D E R DR LAF O R E T D R TILIA RDG OVE R L A N D T R L GEISLER RD ACORN R D G BEVERLY D R CIRRUS WAY SKY LNFLYING CLO U D D R 1 1 2 0 1010 1 1 1 0 1020 1030 1 1 0 0 1040 1050 1090108010701060F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - D2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 48 !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! P R O S P E C T R D IRIS LNGABLE DRCUPOLA LNPINCHERRY LNPICKET DRGENTIAN DRLIATRIS LNCRABAPPLE LNSKY LNINDIGO DRLILAC DREDEN PRAIRIE RDBEVERLY DR CHARLS O N R D PLUMST O N E D R CIRRUS WAY RIVERVIEW RDSPRING RDFLYING CLOUD DR 900 1040 1020 9701000 960 950 910930 980990 1050 1010 920940 1030 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - D3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 49 !!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LIATRIS LNIRIS LNINDIGO DRCHARLS O N R D RIVERVIEW RD FLYING CLOUD DR 990920900960930 940 980950 910970102010001010 1050 1030 10401050 990 1030980 1010 10001040 1020 950 900 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - D4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 50 !!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!! ! !!! ! !! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RUNNEL CIRTREE FARM RDTRAVOIS R D ALI S E P L M O O E R L N J E D L I C K A C T SILVERWOOD DRKIERSTEN PL WILD HERO N P THOMEWARD HILLS RDOXB O W D RWOODRIDGE DRHORSESHOE TRL CHE S H O L M L N JASPE R L N GRI S T M I L L R D GFLYING CLOUD DRPIONE E R T R L 10109201000930990940980950970 1020960103010401050F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - D5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 51 RUNNEL CIR SP O O N R D G NIBLICK LN NOT T I N G H A M T R L PURGATORY RD BRASSIE C IR FRANLO RDIVYWOOD CTFRI A R D R ARCHER LNCR O M W E L L D R BALMORAL LNOLD WAGON TRLANTLERS RDG WI N D S O R T E R SHERMAN DR BLUESTEM LNPHAETON DRJUNIPER LNBLOSSOM RD BENNETT PLGRANT DR MEADE LN BURR RIDGE LN JACKSON DR CREEKRIDGE DR ARROWWOOD DR BUCKINGHAM DR WILD HER O N PT BALSAM LN GRISTMILL RDGLEE DR PIO N E E R T R L 117011601150114011301120111011001090108010701060F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - D6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 52 FLYING CLO U D D R 1 0 8 0 1 0 9 0 1 1 8 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 7 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 6 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 4 0 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - E1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 53 1 1 6 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 4 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 2 0 11 1 0 11 0 0 10 9 0 10 8 0 10 7 0 10 6 0 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - E2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 54 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - E3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 55 970 980 990 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - E4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 56 LANDIN G R D SANDY POINT R D JANINE PLSTONEY WAY MOOER LN RI V E R V I E W D R WWI N T E R P L CONCORD DRK E N S I N G T O N D R JACK PINE TRL ENGLEWOOD D R RIVERVIEW RD SPYGLASS DRF2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - E5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 57 FRANLO RD LEE DRPARKER DRPU R D E Y R D LANDIN G R D FAWNS WAYHUNTINGTON DRAN T L E R S R D G GANTRY WA Y KE N S I N G T O N D R BLUFF R D S H E L T E R G R V SO NOM A R DG RIVERVIEW RD117011601150114011301120111011001090108010701060 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - E6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 58 BLUFF AVE E SHAWNEE TRL E3RD AVE E CAVANAUGH DR SARAZIN ST4TH AVE E SH E N A N D O A H D RMARSCHALL RD S 1ST AVE E COUNTY ROAD 101 110 0 109 0 108 0 107 0 106 0 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - F2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 59 VALLEY INDU S T R I A L B L V D N 4TH AVE E CANTERBURY RD SCOUNTY R O A D 1 0 1 1090 1080 1070 1060 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - F3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 60 VALLEY IND U S T R I A L B L V D N COUNTY R O A D 1 0 1 1100 1090 1080 1070 1060 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - F4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 61 111011001070 109010801060 10701060F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - F5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 62 114011301060112010701110108011001090F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Airspace ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Airspace Zoning Limit Part 77 Contours A - F6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 63 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 64 86TH ST W KATIE CIRERIE CIRLAKE DRMELI S S A C I R DREXEL CT82ND ST WHIDDEN LNDOVE CT DAKO T A A V E CROIXWOOD LN CHEYENNE AVEMAGENTA BAY MI S S I O N H I L L S L N SPRUCE TRLTI G U A C I R ERIE AVELAKE DR EMAR S H D R HIDDEN CTDAKOTA LNW Y N N F I E L D R D DEL L R D ERIN BAY 5 £¤212 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - A1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 65 TOFT CV DEL L RD L INWOOD CTDREXEL CTCURTIS LN82ND ST W LISMORE C IR BEL F A S T C V HOGAN WAYCASCADE DRIS L A N D R D DOVE CT WESTON BAY RDCIMARRON LNBELAIR LN HANOVER L N CROIXWOOD LN GEORGE MORAN DRSOUTH BAY CURV SH O R E L I N E D R ERIN BAY MILLER PKWY W STEA D I N G R D SCENIC HEIGHTS RD MILLER PKWY E £¤212 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - A2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 66 WESTON BAY R D HIL L S I D E D RSCENIC HEIGHTS RDOAK DRLINCOLN LN IS L A N D R D WALLACE RDVIEW LNBELAIR LNSCHOOL RDSAND HILL CIR SOUTH BAY CURV CANYON RDG R E D O A K D RCURTIS LNSHERIDAN LNVILLAG E W O O D S D R MORRAINE WAY MILLER PKWY E TECHNO L O G Y D R EDEN PRAIRIE RD £¤212 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - A3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 67 CYPRESS LNHIL L S I D E D R OAK DR WILSON DRSARATOGA L NTAMARACK TRLRAY M O N D L N HEATHER AVETOWERS LN VILLAGE WOODS DR HI A W A T H A A V E ERWIN CT SORREL WAY MORGAN LN SCENIC HEIGHTS RD SHERIDAN LNMITCHELL RDCORT LAND RD CARMODY DR CHE S T N U T D R TECHNOLOGY DRAN D E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - A4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 68 PRA I R I E C E N T E R D R M E D C O M B L V D 78TH S T W SHANNON C T CASTLEMOOR DR FO U N T A I N P L WILDER DRPRIMROSE LNPRESERVE BLVDCRYSTAL VIEW RDTECHNOLOGY DR CORTLAND RDMAGNOLIA TRL EDEN RDREGIONAL CENTER RD GLEN LNFRANLO RDSINGLET R E E L N COLUMBINE RDFLYING CLOUD DRF2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - A5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 69 86TH ST W LAK E V I E W R D E A V I L A C VENGLISH TURNLA K E R I L E Y T R L SPRINGFIE L D D R NICKLAUS WAYREFLECTIONS RDLYMAN BLVD SUMMERFIEL D D R RILEY LAKE RD MEL R O S E C H A S SUNNYVALE D R LAKE RILEY BLVDLAKE RILEY DRBEARPATH TRL £¤212 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - B1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 70 A V I L A C V WAVERLY CTMAYFIELD DR MCGUFFEY RDSTANLEY TRLRALEIGH LN GOULD RDDOUGLAS DRKILDA R E W A Y NICKLAUS WAY BELVEDERE DRSHEPHERD WAYKENNING RDBIG WOODS LN CANDLEWOOD PKWYNEW MARKET DRBRIARGLEN RDHANOVER LNSCENIC HEIGHTS RDTHATCHER RDWYNSTONE PASSFR E N C H C U R V ROGERS RDDANTON WAY BRAXTON DRDELL RDRILEY LAKE RD BAINBRIDGE DR TRENTON LNBEARPATH TRLPIONEER TRL £¤212 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - B2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 71 GOULD RDSYLVAN RDGCOT T O N W O O D L NBRAXTON DRGATEWAY LNENDICOTT TRL MAYFIELD DRLIVINGSTON LNCEDA R R I D G E R D MCGUFFEY RDSTANLEY TRLSUMMIT DRSUNRISE CIR W KELSE Y L N DOUGLAS DRMILLFORD DR SUNRISE CIR ESTARING LN WKENNING RDPALMETTO DRCAMDON HLTHATCHER RDSTARING LN ESERENITY LN COVE PO INTE RDSUTTON DRMEADOWVALE DRCORRAL LN BERGER DR RED OAK DRB O U L D E R P O I N T E R D MITCHELL RD E D E N P R A I R I E R D PIONEER TRL F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - B3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 72 LUNSKI LNGARDEN L NSHILOH CTLANGDON PL MCCOY CT FLESHER CIR MAGNOLIA TRLKNOLLWOOD DRWESTRIDGE DR SARATOGA LNT W I N L A K E S X I N G STARING LN WSTARING LA K E P K W Y WELL I N G T O N D R ESSE X C T STARING LN ECAMDON HL HILLOWAY RDVICTORIA DRQUEENS TRLHA W T H O R N E D R VILLAG E W O O D S D R CARMODY DR AN D E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y MITCHELL RD BOULDER POINTE RD F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - B4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 73 FRANL O R D AZTEC DRANDERSON LAKES PKWYGRIER LNESSEX CTMA R I G O L D C I R KATHRYN CTGARDEN LN HARVARD AVE C O L U M B I N E R D ZACHMAN CIRCOLLEGE VIEW DR TUSSOCK CTDAHLIA CIRPRINCETON AVEPORC U P I N E C T STARING LAKE PKWYDA R N E L R D CROWFOOT CT HOMEWARD H ILLS RDJASMINE LNPRESERVE BLVDMAGNOLIA T R L WATERFORD CTFLYING CLOUD DRF2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - B5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 74 WESTWIND DR CENTER WAYNOR T H M A R K D R FRANLO RD GRIER L N KATHRYN CTZACHMAN CIRWINDROW DR WATERFORD CT LAKE F A L L D R FLYWAY CIRBLACK MAPLE DRRI D G E W I N D R D BASSWOOD RDBENTWOOD DRNEILL LAKE RDPRESERVE BLVDHIDDEN OAKS DRAND E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - B6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 75 DELL DRRILEY LAKE RDDANE DRKIOWA TRLLAKE RILEY BLVDEASTWOOD CT H IG H V I EW D R LAKELAND TERSUNNYVALE D R MEADOWLARK LNCR E S T W O O D T E R FOX F O R D R D PIONEER TRLF2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - C1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 76 ALTO WAY DELL DR STRATUS CT VALLEY RD ALCOVE CIRSTABLE PATH STI R R U P L N RILEY LAKE RDCOLE CT SKY LNHACKBERRY CT PRESTON PLJONATHAN LN LAFORET DRMACINTOSH RD BRAXTON DRCEDARCREST DRBRIARGLEN RDINGRAM WAY ROGERS RD GEISLER RD CRESTWOOD TER DE L L RDFRONDELL CTDANE DR FRUITWOO D L N SADDLE HORN CTCEDAR FOREST RD TILIA RDG SHETLAND RDBRECKENRIDGE LNHA R A L S O N D R CIRRUS WAYMARSHALL RDBEARPATH TRLPIONEER TRLF2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - C2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 77 MITCHELL RDSUNRISE CIR E STI R R U P L N LA RIVIER CTRIDGE R D STARING LN ESERENITY LN SADDLE HORN CTSHETLAND RDGATEWAY LN CIRRUS WAY VALLEY RD HILLTOP RD PIONEE R T R LEDEN PRAIRIE RDSP R I N G R D F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - C3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 78 RIDGE R D STARING LN ESTARING LAKE PKWYPIONEER T R L F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - C4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 79 COLD S TREAM LN CAR T W A Y C U R V GE R M A I N E T E R WOODRIDGE DRSURREY STYORKSHIRE LNCOLLEGE VIEW DR PAINTERS RDGPO R T A L D R HARVEST LN CREEKWOOD DR M O U N T C U R V E R D PRINC E T O N A V E CREEK KNOLL RDLARKSPUR LNOLY M P I A D RWE L T E R S W A Y SUNNYBROOK RD HOMEWARD HILLS RDFLYING CLOUD DRPIONEER TRL F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - C5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 80 WELTERS WAY AMESBURY LNTAR N C I R SUMAC CIR HAR V E S T L N FOX R U N C I R LEAFTOP CIRPAINTERS RDGBENNETT PLSUNNY B R O O K R D FRANLO RDGE R M A I N E T E R TALUS CIRLAUREL DRAM S D E N W A Y CLUBHOUSE RDOLY M P I A D R OVERLOOK TRLEN T R E V A U X D R MOUNT C U R V E R D PIO N E E R T R L F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - C6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 81 TRAILS END RDLAKOTA LN SIERRA TRLFRONTIER TRL EXPLORER TRLFOXFORD RD OVERLAND TRLVOGEL FARM TRLPATHFINDER DR FARMSTEAD CIR DEERBROOK DRPIONEER T RL FLYING CLOUD D R F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - D1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 82 J O N A T H A N L N DELL RD TURNBULL RD FRONTIER TRL P A TH F INDER DR LA F O R E T D R TILIA RDG OVER L A N D T R L GEISLER RD ACORN R D G BEVERLY DR CIRRUS WAY SKY LNFLYING CLOUD DR F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - D2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 83 P R O S P E C T R D IRIS LNGABLE DRCUPOLA LNPINCHERRY LNPICKET DRGENTIAN DRLIATRIS LNCRABAPPLE LNSKY LNINDIGO DRLILAC DREDEN PRAIRIE RDBEVERLY DR CHARLS O N R D PLUMST O N E D R CIRRUS WAY RIVERVIEW RDSPRING RDFLYING CLOUD DR F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - D3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 84 LIATRIS LNIRIS LNINDIGO DRCHARLS O N R D RIVERVIEW RD FLYING CLOUD DR F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - D4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 85 RUNNEL CIRTREE FARM RDLAGUNA CIRTRAVOIS R D ALI S E P L M O O E R L N J E D L I C K A C T SILVERWOOD DRKIERSTE N PL WILD HER O N P THOMEWARD HILLS RDOXB O W D RWOODRIDGE DRHORSESHOE TRL CH E S H O L M L N JAS P E R L N GRI S T M I L L R D GFLYING CLOUD DRPIONE E R T R L F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - D5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 86 RUNNEL CIR SP O O N R D G NIBLICK LN NOT T I N G H A M T R L PURGATORY RD BRASSIE C IR FRANLO RDIVYWOOD CTFR I A R D R ARCHER LNCR O M W E L L D R BALMORAL LNOLD WAGON TRLANTLERS RDGWI N D S O R T E R SHERMAN DR BLUESTEM LNPHAETON DRJUNIPER LNBLOSSOM RD BENNETT PLGRANT DR MEADE LN BURR RIDGE LN JACKSON DR CREEKRIDGE DR ARROWWOOD DR BUCKINGHAM DR WILD HER O N PT BALSAM LN GRISTMILL RDGLEE DR PIO N E E R T R L F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - D6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 87 FLYING CLO U D D R F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - E1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 88 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - E2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 89 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - E3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 90 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - E4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 91 LANDIN G R D SANDY POINT R D JANINE PLSTONEY WAY MOOER LN RI V E R V I E W D R WWI N T E R P L CONCORD DRK E N S I N G T O N D R JACK PINE TRL ENGLEWOOD DR RIVERVIEW RD SPY G L A S S D R F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - E5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 92 FRANLO RD LEE DRPARKER DRPUR D E Y R D LANDIN G R D FAWNS WAYHUNTINGTON DRAN T L E R S R D G GANTRY WA Y KE N S I N G T O N D R BLUFF R D S H E L T E R G R V SO NOM A R DG RIVERVIEW RD F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - E6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 93 BLUFF AVE E SHAWNEE TRL E3RD AVE E CAVANAUGH DR SARAZIN ST4TH AVE E SH E N A N D O A H D RMARSCHALL RD S 1ST AVE E COUNTY ROAD 101 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - F2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 94 VALLEY IND U S T R I A L B L V D N 4TH AVE E CANTERBURY RD SCOUNTY R O A D 1 0 1 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - F3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 95 VALLEY IN D U S T R I A L B L V D N COUNTY R O A D 1 0 1 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - F4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 96 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - F5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 97 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Safety ZonesWithin Zoning Limits ²!! !!! ! FCM Property Line Safety Zoning Limit RPZ JAZB Zone A JAZB Zone B JAZB Zone C SZ - F6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 98 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 99 86TH ST W KATIE CIRERIE CIRLAKE DRMELI S S A C I R DREXEL CT82ND ST WHIDDEN LNDOVE CT DAKO T A A V E CROIXWOOD LN CHEYENNE AVEMAGENTA BAY MI S S I O N H I L L S L N SPRUCE TRLTI G U A C I R ERIE AVELAKE DR EMAR S H D R HIDDEN CTDAKOTA LNW Y N N F I E L D R D DEL L R D ERIN BAY 5 £¤212 250 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - A1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 100 TOFT CV DE L L RD L INWOOD CTDREXEL CT82ND ST W LISMORE C IR BEL F A S T C V HOGAN WAYCASCADE DRIS L A N D R D DOVE CT WESTON B A Y R DCIMARRON LN CROIXWOOD LN GEORGE MORAN DRSOUTH BAY CURV SH O R E L I N E D R ERIN BAY MILLER PKWY W STEA D I N G R D SCENIC HEIGHTS RD MILLER PKWY E £¤212 170 170 170 200200 230250250 240 240 230 250 240 220 210 230 260 250 200 200 240 230 230 250 240 170 170170 170 250 160170170 170 170170170170 170190180170170170 160 170170170170 170170170170180170 170170170170170180170 170170170170170 170170170170170170 170160 170 170170 160 170 170 170 170 170 170 220 170 170170160 180230 260270 260 170 160190 250 180 270 270270 260 190 270 270 260 190 180 170200 200 180260240220200 190190 190 180 260 210 180180210 190 190270 170220 260 210 200 190270 270 260 170 150 260260 180 190200 200 200210 200210210 200 200 210220 170 250 190 190 250 190 180 250 190200200 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - A2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 101 WESTON BAY RD HILL S I D E D RSCENIC HEIGHTS RDOAK DRLINCOLN LN IS L A N D R D WALLACE RDVIEW LNSCHOOL RDSAND HILL CIR SOUTH BAY CURV CANYON RDG RED OAK D RCURTIS LNSHERIDAN LNMORRAINE WAY MILLER PKWY E TECHNO L O G Y D R EDEN PRA IRIE RD £¤212180 200 190 200 170 200 180 190 170170 170 210 170 160 170 160 170170160 170170 170 170160 170 170160170 170 170 170 160 170170 170 170 170 170150150180 160 150180 170 190 180 170 180 180180170 180180180 200 170 180170 160 180180170 170 190 190170180170170170 190190190180 170 190 190 190 190 170 190 180 180180180170180180180190160170180 180160 180180 170 170 190190 180180200 180180 200 180 180 180 170 180 180 180170 160 160 180170 180 180180 160 160 180170 180170160 190 180160210 190 160 160 180180170170 190 180 180 170 180 160 210210 160 170160 200 200 180 180 180 180190180180190 180170180170190180210 180160 180180180150150150170180170 170 170 150 150180180 170 150190 180 150 140170 170160 150180180 180 150150 160 160 150 140160 190 170 170170190 170180170 170 180 160170190 180 170 170 180170 180 160 190 190 150190190190 210 210 210 180 170200180190190 150160 180 190 150150190170170180190150170170170140180190 150170180170180180170190180170170140170170140180 150150180190160180180 150170190170160140150170180190190140140170170180150140 150 160180 170 180 150 190 150190 190 180 150 170170180180 150 150 170180190 190 170 160160170200 190 160 160180170180180 140 150 150 180 180190200 180 170200 200210 190 170 180200 200 190190 190 190 180 210220 170 150170180 170 160 190 170 180190 170 190 170 150 170 150 190 170180180 140 170 190 180 180 170 160 170190190180200160200 190 190 170 180 180 180180 180 190 190 190 150 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - A3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 102 HILL S I D E D R OAK DR WILSON DRRAYMOND LN HIAWATHA AVEVILLAGE WOODS DR ERWIN CT SORREL WAY MORGAN LN SCENIC HEIGHTS RD SHERIDAN LNMITCHELL RDCARMODY DR CHES T N U T D R TECHNOLOGY DRAN D E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y 180 180 190 190 210 190190 210 170 180 180 210 170 210 200 210 210 180 180180190 190 200 200 210 210 180 180 180 180 190 200 210 190 210 170 210 220170160190180180 160 180180 180160160 180 180 170 180 190180 180 190 180 180 190180 180170 180 170180170170190 180 190 180190190190180 180 170190190180 170170190 180190 190 190 170190 180170190190180 180190 180200180180 180180 180180180 190 180180180180190 180 180180180190180190200180 180190 180 170170190190 180190 180180190180190 180180170170 180 190 180180180190180180180180 180180190 180180180180180 180190180180 180 180 180180 180 180180170 190 180 180180 180180180 160 160 170 200 210 180 180 160 180 180180 180180 190180 190 180 180 180 180 170 180 180180180 200180180 180190200 180 200 160 180 180 180180 180190180180180180180180 180 180 180180180170180180 180180 180170 180170 170 170 180 160150150 150 150 180190190150150 220150 140 140150140140 150 160 170140 140 190180 180160180 170150150 150160160150140140140140 160 180170170 220 220150180 170 180170 220 190180170 150140 170 180 150 190 220180140210150180190220160 160 190150150170 190150140170140 220180180180 220140170 150160 180 180 220 160 180180180190 140150 180 210150140150180 200 140 180140170 220150180150180220140 220140180170 180 180 220 220220150180140150220160140180170150140180140140150150220140160150 190 180 180150 210 140 180180150140150170 180160150140150140 180 180170140 220140140140150140140 230 140 160 170 230220 140 220 160 170160160140 170 140140140 180 150150 170 170 150 160 160 170 220 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - A4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 103 PRA I R I E C E N T E R D R M E D C O M B L V D 78TH S T W SHANNON CT CASTLEMOOR DR FO U N T A I N P L WILDER DRPRIMROSE LNPRESERVE BLVDCRYSTAL VIEW RDTECHNOLOGY DR CORTLAND RDMAGNOLIA TRL EDEN RDREGIONAL CENTER RD GLEN LNFRANLO RDSINGLET R E E L N COLUMBINE RDFLYING CLOUD DR190 210 190 190 220 180 190 190 180 170 180 230 180 220180 210 190 200 220 220 200 220 220220 220 220220 220220220220220220 230 230 230 230 200 190 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - A5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 104 86TH ST W LAK E V I E W R D E SPRINGFIE L D D R NICKLAUS WAYREFLECTIONS RDLYMAN BLVD SUMMERFIEL D D R RILEY LAKE RD MELR O S E C H A S SUNNYVALE D R LAKE RILEY BLVDLAKE RILEY DRBEARPATH TRL £¤212 330 330 270 320 340 310 290320 320 320 320 340 300 320 320 270 310 330 320 320 310320 320320 320 320 320 320 310 320 320 320 330 320 280 320 310310320 320 310 300 330 330 320 270 290 310 320 310 320 290 310 330 320 330 330320 310 340 310 320 340 320 310 270 330 290 330 300 270 330 310 270 320 280 320 320 210260210 280 270270 240 220230 280 250 250 290 260 240 260 160 200220 170180190260210 260 220270 260 240 240 230 200 240 190 260260 210 270 240 270 240 270 150 300 280 260 240 270 220 210 290 310 210250 200200260260210 250 230 290 270 270 250250 210 200240 260260 270 270 300 280 270 270 200240250250 270 250 260 240 240250 270 260 210 250 260 270 260280250260 240 230 200 270 240270 240 270 320 230 210260 260 250 270 250 210 260 260 250 250 200 240270280 200250 260 240260 260270290 290 250 290 240 290 260 260 280 240 200220280 260 210 260 300 270270 290 230 300 260 240300 270 150 150 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - B1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 105 MAYFIELD DR MCGUFFEY RDRALEIGH LN DOUGLAS DRNICKLAUS WAY BELVEDERE DRBIG WOOD S L N BRIARGLEN RDHANOVER LNSCENIC HEIGHTS RDWYNSTONE PASSROGERS RD DANTON WAY BRAXTON DRDELL RDRILEY LAKE RD BAINBRIDGE DR TRENTON LNBEARPATH TRL PIONEER TRL £¤212 170170 170170 160 160 160150 140150160160160 150160 140210210150150 160160 220 160 160200 170160170 150 140160 150 160 260 160 160 150160150150150160150150 160 150160 160150150150150 150160160160 150160150150160 140160 150 160 160150 150150160 150160150 150160 150150 160160150150150160160 160 150160 150160140140150150160 200 150160 150170 150150 150 140180190210160 150160140150160 150 160 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 140160150160200160160 150 150150 160 160160 150160 150 190 140160150160 150 160150150 160 150 160 150 150 160210 160160160150 140150160150 150 160 150150160 150 160160 150 150 170 150160 150150150160160150160 160 160 150150 150150160160 160 150 160 150 150160 160 150150 150160150160 140160 140 160160 150 180220210170160210160160160 180160160 140200200 210 160 150150160150150150150 230 150150150 160 160 150150 150160 150150 170160160150160160 150150 140150160 150 160 140 190 160150210 160 200 160 160 150 170160160170180 160200210160160260160 180 160160260210 180160 180160 150160 150150160 160 170150160160160160180150160160270 200 160 160160160150 150 150 150 150160 160 170160 160 170 190240240 160160 150 160210 160 160 160 160160 150 160190 170160 160 160 160 260 180 200 210 160 160 170160 180 180160160180160160160250160260160170210160160 180160160 170150170 150 230 200 190 210 160 180160 140 160230 170 170150150 170160150200 190210 170 260 150 160250 180 160160160160 150 150 180 150160210 210 150 160 160260170160 150 160 150 150150 200 160150 160150 160160170160160150200 150 150150 160 160 160 150150 170210170260 150 160220 160 160270 160 160 180160 180 160160 170170170 170 190 160 170160150160 170250 190 160160190 170 150 170160160150 170170170170 160 180150150 170 160160150 210 170170170 150 160 150 170 200220 150160 150 160 160 180 160 260 160 160210 160 170210 170 210 260 170 170270150 160160 170 170170170160160170170170160160170170170170160 160 160160 170160 170170170 170 160 170170 170 170170170 160 160170190 170 160160 170180230150160160 170170 160160150 170170170170170170170170170170 160190 170150180150160170190190170190160180160160160 150150 170 180160160 180160220 220 170260 170160 170 170160 170170160160160170170170170170170170170 160 150240 170160 150 150150 150150 150150150150150 150 150 150 160150160150150150150150140 150 150 140140 160140 150150 150 150 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - B2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 106 GOULD RDCOTT O N W O O D L N GATEWAY LNENDICOTT TRL MAYFIELD DR CEDAR R I D G E R D MCGUFFEY RDSUMMIT DRSUNRISE CIR W KELSEY L N DOUGLAS DRMILLFORD DR SUNRISE CIR ESTARING LN WPALMETTO DRCAMDON HL STARING LN ESERENITY LN MEADOWVALE DRBOULD E R P O I N T E R D CORRAL LN BERGER DR RED OAK DRMITCHELL RD EDEN PRA IR IE RD PIONEER TRL 190 150 170 170 170 160 170170160 170170 170 170170 170170170 170170170 170 170 170150140 150 150 140 170160140150160140170 140 150 160 150 160 170 170 150 150 190180 180 170 160170 170150150140140 150 170150 160 170 180150160140140150160140170160150 170 170150150 160170150140 160150 140150150 140140 170140140 170 140 160 160150150150140 170150150 150 150 150 170 190150150150 150 160 150150150 180140160150150 140 160 180150150 150 150150140 150 150 160 160190 150 160150 170140140 150 160 140 160 140 150150 150 150 160140140 140 140 140 160150 190 150 150 160140170150150 170150150 140 140 160 150 150 140 150 140 150 150 150 150 140 150150 170 190 150 200150150 150 150 150 180150150 170 140 160150160 160 150 160 200 160170 150 150 210160 150 200 190 170 150 140 170140 150 140 150 180 150150 150 180 160 190190 160 140150150150150 150 170150 180140 180 160 160 180 160 150 160180 170170170160170 190160160160 190 180 170 170 190160 140 150 150 140 150 150 150150 160150140170 170 170 150150 180 140 160170150150160 200150 160 170 170160 160 190 160160 190190150160160160140150150140170160180160 180 190160 170 170 180170 150 190160170180170170180170150180170180180180170180170170180170 150 140150 160150150170170 150 150 160140 170 170 160 180 170 180 160 190 180 200150 150 150 180150160160160 150 160 200150170 200 200 160 180170 170 200 210 170 170 150170160 190 170 190 150 190170150 150 170 150160 190 170 190 180 170160190 170 170 170 170 170 170 180 190170 190180 180 190180 180180 180 180 180 180 170 160 180 190 170170 190 170 170 160 190 170180180170 170190190140160200150 160 190170160 190 160170 170 170 170 170 190 170170 190160150170150170170180170 180180170160 180 170190 160 170 190160150160170 170160150 190 200 170 160 170170170160 170180 190 190 160 170160 200200190160 200 150160 150 200180 150 150 150 180 170 170 190 150 170170 180 170 190150150 180 170 180170170 190 180 170 180 170 180 180 170 190170 170 190150 200 200190200170 170 180 180 170170 190 170 170 170 180 180 190 170 150 190170170 200150200 180 170 180180170170 190 180 170 170170 190170170190160 190 180180 190180 200 170 180 170 170 180 190170 190 190 160 190170 170160170180 160 170 170170170 180 170 180170 190170 190190190 180 170 170170180 170170 190160170170160170 180170150150160160 180180190 190 170 180170 180 180 180180170 190170170170190 190160170190170190170 170 170 190 160 170170170 140150 140140 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - B3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 107 MCCOY CT MAGNOLIA TRLT W I N L A K E S X I N G STARING LN WSTARING LA K E P K W Y ESSEX C T STARING LN ECAMDON HL VICTORIA DRQUEENS TRLCARMODY DR AN D E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y MITCHELL RD BOULDER POINTE RD 230 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 180 180 180 170 170170 170 170 170 180 180 180 160 170 160 170 190 180200230200 180 170 170190210170 170180 170 180160 180180 180 170 180180 170170200 180150 160160 160 160 170160 170160160 170150 200160 160 180170 160150 170180 160 160 180160160160170 170 220 180180 160 200 160 160 230160170160 170 170 180180 180170 180160170180230170160 180 200 160170220180 180 180170160180180160160160 200 170200170 180180160 170 230 180160190180 180190160 200 210 170 180170170170180180180 160 180 180 170 180 170 210 170200 200 190 210 170 180 180170170180 210 200 190 170190 160 210210 180170 170 160160 160210160200 170170 170180170180 170190 210190170190 230 190 180 230230 170 180180180 230 230200 210 210180 180 170190 230 210 180 170 170 170170 180210 190 200 170170 170190170170170180190 190 200 170180180180 160 170150 160 160 180 180 170 170170170170170190170170190170 180 230 180 200 220 200 180180190210 190 210 190200 200 210 190 200 210 170 180210210 170220 200 160200 210 170 190190 190 210 170190 180 200190 200 220 160 170200 170 190 170180190 210 200 170170170 170 180 170 170210 170 180 170 170170190190180170 180 170 170170190 180 180 180 180180 170180 190 170170190 190 180 180 170170190190 170 170190190 210170200 170190 170190 170180 180170170170 180190 180 190 170 170180170170180 180 170200170170 190 170 170 170220 170170170 210170200180180 220180 170210 170190190 220200 190210 190 190 180 170180 170190190 190 180 200 160 200200200 190 180 180220180200 170220180 200 170 180 200 210 210200 180210210200 170170180 180170 170 160 170 170190 180 180 170190 170170 170170170 170 170180170 180170 170180180190190 170 170 170180170170 170170170 170 200 170 210 180 170 200 160 180 200 210 200 180200210170 170170190 170 180 180 170 170180 210 170 170170180190180 160200 160 200 160 200 170190200210200200160220160160200 190190180 170 170170 170 170 180190170180170 170170180 170180170170190 170180 180190 180190 190 170180170 180170170190190170170170170170170190190180 180 170 180 190 180180180170190200180 180180 190190 180 190 190 170190 170 170 170170 170 180180170 190 180 180180180 170170170 190 180190190 170190 180170 180190 170 210190 170170180170170170210180190170 170190170180170 190 170190 170190 180180170170170160190190190180190190180 180190 180 170170190 180170 180 180170220 180 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - B4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 108 FRANL O R D AZTEC DRANDERSON LAKES PKWYPRESERVE BLVDGRIER LNESSEX CTMARIGOLD CIR KATHRYN CTGARDEN LN HARVARD AVE CO L U M B I N E R D ZACHMAN CIRCOLLEGE VIEW DR TUSSOCK C TDAHLIA CIRDARNEL RDSTARING LAKE PKWYCROWFOOT CT HOMEWARD H ILLS RDJASMINE LNMAGNOLIA T R L WATERFORD CTFLYING CLOUD DR170 170170170 170170 170170170 210200 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 180 170170 210 210 180 170 170 170170 170 170 170 210 210 210 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 170 210 180 170 190 200 210200 180170 190190 210 180180 190 230 190 210 180 220190 220220170 210 180 210210220 200190 190 210220 210190220210220190190 180 210200 210200200200180 190 210 180 180 200200 180180 220 190190 190 180 220180 180 180180 200 200 210180180 210 190 210180200 200200180180190 180180 180 220180180180220200 170 200 190190 220 180 180180 220180 170 170 180 200210180180170180190220180180180180190200 200 200 160 170160 210190 180180 180 180 180 180180180 200 220180180180190190210220180 200 190 220190200180180180180 180 180 190 190 220 180 210 220180 210210210 220 210170 220 190180 180 200 190 220200 180 180 190180220190 160 190 220180 230230 190 190 210220180190180190 240 220 220 200170 220220 200 230 230 210180210180 170 230220190210190220 230 230 190 230220 200200 220 220190 170 230220220 220 180 210210 230220180230 220170 180 190190180 220 220220 170 180160170170170 180 220 220 230 230 190 200 200180 180 210 230 210 230170 230220220 230230220230190230230 180 230 170 220 210 170 190 230 220210 230230190 210 220210 230210210220210 220 230220 140 190 170 190 210 170 190 220 220170200190 230 230230230190 190 190 190190 190 230180 190 170170 170 220 230220 170 180 170 170 180 170 170 190 230180 220 230180 180 210 230 220 190 190190 190 230 190170 220180180 230 170 180170 170 190 230180220230 180 170 220220170180200 170 220 220 220 220190170180 240 180 220230 180 210 230 220 160180 190 210 230230 210220 230230 220 210210 190 220190 170 170 190 210170 210 230 230170200220 220 180 170 180 200 210 220 230190180 180 180 190 210 220160 210 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - B5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 109 PRESERVE BLVDCENTER WAYNOR T H M A R K D R FRANLO RD KATHRYN CTZACHMAN CIRWINDROW DR GRIER LN WATERFORD CT LAKE F A L L D RBLACK MAPLE DRRI D G E W I N D R D BASSWOOD RDBENTWOOD DRNEILL LAK E R DHIDDEN OAKS DRAND E R S O N L A K E S P K W Y 220 220 210 210 220220 210 230 260210240250240240 230 200 220 210 240 220 210 250 270240250240 270210220 210220 240 210 210200 240 250 260200 230220 240 220 180 220 240230 250230230 250200 210 210 190 210 200 230190 220 220 180 220 230240 200180 230 280240 230 210240 250230 240 230 200 220 190 210 190 220 190 230 220 210 220 220220 190 230 230 200 230 230 240 240 240240 210230 210 220 210230230 230 200 240 220 230 220 230210 220220 230 220 230 230230 220 210 220 230 230 200 230 230 230 210 220 230230 220 230 230 220210 230 230 230 230 210 210 230230 230230 230230 240 220 220 230220 230 220 230 230 230220 230220 220 220 220 200 220230 210 220230 230 210 220 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - B6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 110 DELL DRRILEY LAKE RDDANE DRKIOWA TRLEASTWOOD CT HIGHVIEW DRLAKELAND TERSUNNYVALE D R MEADOWLARK LNCR E S T W O O D T E R FOX F O R D R D PIONEER TRL310 290 280 320 340 310 300 300 240 290 320 290 350350 290 360 320 280 350 330 280 330 300 300 340 330 320 320340 320 280 310 300 270 240 320 290 320 300 270280 250 320 290 310 340 320330 320 320 310 270 320 350 320 320 260 330 350 260 240 140 250 140 220 220 210 210 160 230 160 210 140 210 200 210 160 180 170 250230 190 150160160 140 170 180 230 180210 220230 260 200 170 180230230220 160 230 160230 150160230230160 200 230 170 230 150 140220 140 230 150160 210 220 160 150220160250 170 210 150 230 250240 230 230 170 200 210 140 230 220 140 230230 210 150 150 140 230 140 140210 240 140240 140210 190 140150170 190 190 210 210 240 140200150 140200210 220 140 160 150150 190 210210 170 220 220 180 180 140 140220190 160 140 140150 220230220 170250250 140230 240 240 140240240150 140240 230 260 220 220 220 150 160 150 150 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - C1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 111 BRAXTON DRALTO WAY DELL DR STRATUS CT VALLEY RD STI R R U P L N RILEY LAKE RDCOLE CT SKY LNHACKBERRY CT PRESTON PLCEDARCREST DRROGERS RD GEISLER RD CRESTWOOD TER D E L L R D DANE DR CEDAR FOREST RDTILIA RDG SHETLAND RDBRECKENRIDGE LNHARALSON DR CIRRUS WAYMARSHALL RDBEARPATH TRLPIONEER TRL130 120 120130 120130130140 130140140140 130 150130 140150 170120 140 140 130 130 130 140 130140 170140 140140130140130120130 150 150 120130130 130 130 140150 130 140 120140160 130160130 140140 150140 150140200140130130130130140 160 160130 120130 140 130 120 130 120 170 130 120130 130130130130130130130 130 120150160 130130 120 120 140 130140 130 140 140140 120160 120 130130140 120120 120 130130130120130130120120140140120 120 150 160 130140 130 140 130 110 130110 140 170 130120 150130140110 130 120130 160140110170120120 160 120130160 120120 120160 150130150130150120160130 150130130140140120120130 140 130 120160 200 130 130130 150 140 140 150130 170130160 130 130 130 120 160 120 130 170120150 130 130 140 150130150 120120 130 120130150 170 140 150 150 140 130 150 150 140 130 130 130 130 130130130120 130150160 170110120160130140160150150140120130130160150 170 170120130120150120 120130140140 160 130 140140130 140 140 130 130 140120130130140 120140170 130140140 130 120120130140 120140120 140 130 130140 150 120130 150 170150130 120 130 130150 170150150 160140 140 140 150140130140 140140 140140140 130130150 130140 140 130 150 130 130140 140 140 130 130130 120130140140120 120130 150140140 190 140 160 150 140170 120 140130 130140 140 130130 140140 190 130 140 140 140130130130130140 210 140150130130 140150130150 130 130130130130130 140140 140150 150 140 120 160120 150130 150 130 130 130 130 130 160 150 150 150130130 140140140130150150130140140 170 140 140 140 130 130130 140 130 160 130 160150130150 140 120 150 120 170 150 130 170130170 140 130 140 180 130130 130130 150130140 160160140120 140 140 150 120190 160 140 130 140 160 140 140 150140 160 150160150140 150160 150 160 150160 140 150150140140150140150160140150150 150150 160 150160140 150 150160 150 140 150 160 150150 160 160 180 170130130140140160160170170130140180130170150140160170130130170130130120130170170120120170 170 120130140130130120140 160 130130 130120150140130 130 130140130130130120160160130130 120110 120 160 170 130 160 160 160130 140140150140130150 140150140160 140 140 140 130 140 130130140140 140130 140130150140 160 150 150 150 150 150160150 150 150 140160150140150160150 150 150130160 130 130 160 150120 160160 150130160160150140 130 140 170 140150150170150160140150150160150140140150150150150140150150 140 140150150150150150 150150150 150 140 140 150 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - C2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 112 MITCHELL RDSUNRISE CIR E STI R R U P L N LA RIVIER CTRIDGE R D STARING LN ESERENITY LN SHETLAND RDGATEWAY LN CIRRUS WAY VALLEY RD HILLTOP RD PIONEER T R LEDEN PRAIRIE RDSP R I N G R D 170 140 150140 140140 150 150 140 140 130 130 150 150180170 150 160 180150160 170 150150150170 180170 150 160 150 150 140140150 150150 140 170 160 140 120 160 170 150 170 150 150 160160140 170 140 140 130 140 130 140140130 160 160 140 140 150150 150 150 160 170 150 150 140140 150140150150 150 150 150 160 170 150150 150 150 150 150 140 160150 150 160160150 140 140 150 150 150 130 150 150 150 140 150 150 150 160160 160 160170 150140160140180 140 150 150170140160 150 150 160 170 150170160 150 160 150 160160140160 170 150 150 150 160150150 170160150 190150140 180140140 180 150 140 150 150 150 180140160 150 160150150 160160 50 150 160 180150150 150 150 150 160140 150150180140170150150140170150 150 150 150 150160170 140 140 130 140 140140 150 150 180140140150150 130 150150 150150150140140140140 160150140140 140 140140140140140140140150140140 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - C3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 113 RIDGE R D STARING LN ESTARING LAKE PKWYPIONEER T R L 20 140 130 70 150 150 150 120 160 190 190 150150 180150 150150 160160 70 170 150 150 170 170 30 150 150 150150 150 150 150 160 160 150 150 150 150 150 160160160150 150 160 150 150 170150 160150 170 190 160160150 160 150 170 200 180 160 160 150 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - C4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 114 WOODRIDGE DRSURREY ST COLLEGE VIEW DR HARVEST LN M O U N T C U R V E R D CREEK KNOLL RDOL Y M P I A D RWE L T E R S W A Y SUNNYBROOK RD HOM EW A R D H I L L S R D FLYING CLOUD DRPIONEER TRL 200 180 190 180 180 100 170 210 170 200190 120 210 230 220240 170 160 200 170 200 190 210 200 240 230 220 220 190 190 180 220220230 220 240 230 230 190 190 170 200 190 160160 230 180200190 180 180200190 190160160170 200 190 180130 180 80 190 180 170180180170 80 180160180 50 100 190 190 200 230 220200 190 180 100 170 100 190120 190 170 190 170 180180 190170160170140170170160160190160160170160190180180 160 150 160 190 190 160 190180 160 170 190180170 180170190180 150 170 170 190170170170 170 190190 170 170 190170190200 200 210 210 200180180190170180 200190180 230 220220 200 220 220200190 160 190 200 220 110 190200210 180220 200 220 210 180 240 200 220 200 220200210220210230 170 180 250 180 210 200 210 190190210 180180190180170180 130 130 170160100 160 170 170 170170170190170 180200 200200 200200 170 210170 220240240200240210240 180160160 190 190 160 180 190170180200 70 190170200 170 190 190 190180 160 170 200190 170 220 210 220 210 220 170 190 190 190190180 250 220 230240 220 240230230 230 200200 210170 210 180170 170 210220200 170 180 210220 230 230 210 230220 230 220220 220 220 220220 210240230 240 210220220 220 220 220 230 220 220 240220230 220 220 220220220210 240240 210 220 220 220 210 210210 210 220 220200 180 210 200170220220210190 210 220 230220 210220 210200 170 210 220230 220 240230 230 200 210 220210210230 190 220 210 210210 210 220 200220 200 220 200 190 210 230230190230 210230230 230220 230 220 220 230220210220220220220 230210210210230 200 210200 220 210 230230200210 220200 210230230190190 220190200 220210220200 200210 220190 220220190 220 220190190 210 210210 220 220190200200190200210 200 230 220 240 230 230 230 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - C5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 115 WELTERS WA Y AMESBURY LNBENNETT PLTARN C I R SUMAC CIR HA R V E S T L N GARRISON WAYFRANLO RDGE R M A I N E T E R TALUS CIRLAUREL DRAM S D E N W A YOLYMPIA DROVERLOOK TRLENTRE V A U X D R MOUNT C U R V E R D PIO N E E R T R L 250240240250200200200230220 280260190220260270180240280 180 170 240 230 220 180 160 200170220210170210 200 200 250 200 220 170220170 200 200 200 230 260 230 170210180170 260260260 250 190 180180 220200 240 230 260200200 240190230 220 260210250 260210240210210210 210 240210 250190210250 260 210 200 210 250 270190210180180240240180180190190180230180230190250250180230200 180 240180200 230 230190190170190 240180 240190190180200240170180190240170190190180200200200 280220200200230 230 240 180 240240230 260 220 200220 250 250 220 210 200 180 250210 270 210 280260 180 210 220 250 220220210 250 250 270 210 270 260250 240 200 260 190 280 190190 250190180220240200230 200 180 170 200 230170220200190 240 250180200210 180200 230180 240200210 260160 220240240 190240240190 200 180 200 190 190 180 240230190 230 250 200 230210 190200 190190 260 200 180 240 190 200 200 180 210 220 250210 250 210 250 260230 280 210240 170 210210 210 230 190210 200 230 210 160190200200 250 250180160210190240170 260160250180270180170270270 210220 250210 280 210 220 210240 250 240 210220 240 270250 270 270220250240210 250 250220 240 250240 260 250 210 230 220 200220220210 260 220 190 180 270240210200220240250180 250 180200200200210170220230 220240 200230 260 240180 220 250210250 200 180220 170 250240170 260 260220200180 230 170 270230190210260210200230 250 220 260210230 220 250 250230210 250250 270250200190190 250 240 240 280 280 230 280 280 220 270 280240 240 240220240 260 270 260 220 240 270240260240 280240 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - C6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 116 TRAILS END RDLAKOTA LN EXPLORER TRLFOXFORD RD OVERLAND TRLVOGEL FARM TRLPATHFINDER DR FARMSTEAD CIR DEERBROOK DRPIONEER T RL FLYING CLOUD D R 320310 160 130 200200 190 180200 140 220 150170160280 200 200 160 150 250 180 190 190 160 140170140220 210 210 230 160 130290180 220 230270 220290 210 190 250 150260170180 190 210280 190290250 190270 160 140 170280210 160290 200260 170 140220190250210 260270 230240 160250280 200 250 260 250 290 300 180 260 270 260 190250 180 220 190220 160 240 130 140190 130220250 230 290 210 210 190 270 190220260 270 230 140270 140150260220 140240230 240270 270 130200 210 190 200 260 190 200 200230 140 280 160190190 260 200230210 140 200 160200170 140 140 230 140150 140190240160180160220140230140 150200290 130200240140 170 270 140140 280 150140 140250230140 200280 140 140250190 130140250 310 140250 290 140 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - D1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 117 DELL RD TURNBULL RD TILIA RDG OVE R L A N D T R L GEISLER RD ACORN R D G BEVERLY D R CIRRUS WAY SKY LN FLYING CLOU D D R 170 190190 150 160 160 190 180 160 190 160150 150150150 150 150 150 180 160 150 150 180190190 150180 160 150 130 150 160 150160 150 150180 150 140 150 150 150180150 160 140 150150 190 150160150 190 160 150150160140140 150150150 160 130 160 130 130130 160 130 150150 160 150 160 130 140 160 130 160 140 170 130 150160 160 160 170 140 150160150150 160 130 150130 140150140130 160180 130 130 140 150 150 160 160 140130 160130 160140130140130150140150 140 130 160 160 160130130130 170 130 130 170 170 170 180150170140140 140 130 140150 170150160 140 130 150 170 170130140 130 140 140140140 140200 190 160140 170 180140140 140 130 150 140140 130 150140 140130130 140140150 140 140 140 130 180 150 160 310 340 230 260 150 150150260260320 150 150150 160 140140 170 150 160 160170170150 150140140140140140150140160180160 150150140140140140 150 130150 150 160 130 140 150 140 150 150 140 130 130140 160140210140 150 160160 160150140130140 130 140 160160 170140150140130130130140140160140130130140 170 170150180130130140140 150160 160 160 160 160160 150 150160150150150150150150150150150150150 150150150150150 150 170170 180180 190 190 180 170170 190 160160170160 170 150 150150 160160170170 150 150150 150 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - D2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 118 PINCHERRY LNLIATRIS LNSKY LNINDIGO DR EDEN PRAIRIE RDBEVERLY DR CHARLS O N R D PLUMST O N E D R CIRRUS WAY RIVERVIEW RDSPRING RDFLYING CLOUD DR 320 180 300 170 160 150 190190 150 160 160 190190 180 160 190 170170170160160170170 190 170 170 160 170 170 160150 160150 170160160 150 180 170150 180150180150150180160160 170 170150 180160180180180 170 160 180160 150150160 160 180170160160 150 150 150 180160160150160170170180150160150160160160160150160150180160180170 150 180 180 150 160 180150160 180180180180190150 180170160 160160160170 190 160 160 150150 160160 160180 150 170180170170170180170180180 150 180150150160170 170150170 170 160 200 150150 190190200 180150180180180 170 150 180 180180 150 160 150 160150 160150 330 200 280 150 180 290 220 40 270 160 170170180150170180180170 200 200 190 180 200 150 180 290 200 200 180 190180 170 190170150150180180180150 180 190180190 200 180 170 180170 180 190190 190 170190 190180 190 190 180 180 180 180 190 190 190 160 150 200150 200 200 180 200160 180180 200 180 180 190 200180 200180 190 190 200180 190210210 210 160 200 190 210 210180 190 180 210150160210210 190 200170 190 200 200200200200180150 200160220220 190190 190150 190150150 210 190 210 200 210 200220 180220190 180210190190200190190160 110 140 120 120130 190 170 120 180 170180170 160 180 140 180 170 160 140150140140 200 180 170 140 130150 200 140140 120 170 170 190 160 160180170 160 180 160130 120130190110 110 110 100120110110120 200 290 190 150 180 180 190 180 160150150 150150 160 150 160160160160 200 280 280 220220 230230 220 200200150 150 160 150 150150 150 180 150 180 150150 260 170 170150150160 180150 200 190 200 150 160160 220200210 180 180 210 190 170170160160170 170 160 150 150150150150150150150150150150 150 170170150150150150150150 150 170170 180180 190 190 180 170170 160160 150 150 150 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - D3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 119 CHARLS O N R D RIVERVIEW RD FLYING CLOUD DR 170170170170170160 170 170 170 180 170 180180 170170 170 180180180180 170 180160 180 180170180 180 150 180 180 180 160 180 190 200 190 330 40 40 140 180 200 190 200 180 190190 10 280 140 140290 0 20 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - D4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 120 TREE FARM RDRUNNEL CI R ALI S E P L SILVERWOOD DRKIERSTEN PL WILD HER O N P THOMEWARD HILLS RDOXB O W D RWOODRIDGE DRCHE S H O L M L N JASPE R L NFLYING CLOUD DRPIONE E R T R L 220200240240230190220230 240 230230 220210220180210 200160 230 220160210 220230220230210240210230240210 250 170 190170 210 240 220230160240200230 160 230190170 200180 180 240 240240170 230220 160 190 250190250250 230230250220240180250 220 170 240180150 240250240250 210240 230 190 200230 140 220 220 130 220 250160110 240 250 220250250 260 240 130 190 250200 220 210200 220 220170150250220210210 220180 150 220 190 230170160 200150230 210190 230190 200210200220200230150230160220 190 230180 230 220 190 220170170200190 240180 200220220240 220 230160 190 210 210 230230 180 210 160 200 230200200210160160 210 220200220 220160 220230200 190 200190190160150180 210 150 160 230230 210240 210 220230160160 190 220 220230200160220230160170230220 230160160 230 230150180 160 210150230210220200 230230190 220 230 160 230 220220240 210160190 220160210 200 240 220220160220 220220160190160 250 240 190 190 260 250 230 200 230230240 170 200 220 240 210220250210240240240 220 240 240210210200220 230240230230210230240240240230 90 210 230 180 220 230200 240 230220 230 210200 240 190210200190190210 240190 230 200190 200 240210 200 230 210 200 210 240210 240190 240240 240200240 250 240240200 250 240 210 180210 200190 210 240190180200200190190 200 240 200190 170 190 180 240240180170170180190190 230 230 240 190 180190 240180240170190170200200 200 240200 250190190200 190 170 250 240180180 210 180 180 180 200 190 190 250 200 240 240200 230 80 190200 190 110 190200210 250190190190 210 180180 250 180210190190210130 190 250 180 250 200200210170 200220150220220210 200220180 200170170 150 150 20 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - D5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 121 SP O O N R D G NIBLICK LNPURGATORY RD FRANLO RDFRI A R D R ARCHER LNBALMORAL LNWINDSOR TERSHERMAN DR BLU E S T E M L N PHAETON DRJUNIPER LNBLOSSOM RD BENNETT PLGRANT DR MEADE LN BURR RIDGE LN JACKSON DR CREEKRIDGE DR BUCKINGHAM DR WILD HER O N P T BALSAM LN GRISTMILL RDGLEE DR PIO N E E R T R L 230 190 190 200220 240230240 310 260200250200230200 320220 230 290210220240200200 250 260 210 280220230230280230 250 270230230220 270210 240240230220230210230 320320240230 250 190 270 300 230 240 260190240230220240250 290 210 200180230230240180230 240 240230 240 260240240230220210 220 240 260 200 240230210230 320240210210240 320240190230200240240 220230 320230230230240310230200270240240230220180230180260200210230230230300220240220230230230220250 210 320 220 270240 310210210260190200 260240 300 290 240 280240 230 210210200190 190 210 170 240230 260230220200 220 310 200 220 300270 250 260200 220 220 220 210 250210 270210 320 200 290 310220220210200200 220210190 320 200200 200210190240 220 260 190 210200240 210 220220 190 280260250 180 180 210200190220210210190190 220 210 200 200 200 220 230 210 210 270210210210250240220220230210200260210 200 210 260 220 320 170 240 230210 210 200 200210 200 210 210 230 240230200240 250220220210 300 230 320210230 300280280230 210 270250260 270260 280270 270250 250230 330 290230220210290 310 290230 300 330 260 260220230220220230260 240 260260 220 240210 270 300250 260230250210240200210190230 300290200190 210 230 230190190 220 250200220230 260250210200 200230 220 240 240 260 260230 290220240 310190 330230280 180 210 230220 260210220230 220 240230230 280240 280210 220 210 260 260 280230220 230230 210 230 280250250220 220 190 300280240220290240170190190180190260200190210200 180 300230220 290220220210210200 190250 230200180200170 270240170 210 220210210 180210210 220170 280 200 190 270 250 230 250210 270 180 180 220170 190 200230 210200210170210 210 210190 260180 220 210220 220 190 230230 230 230 230 240180 170 220210210180 180 210170170200210220180240180 240 240210180210210240200210210180210210210 230 210200190180 300230 230 240 250 230 180230 300 180200 200190170180190180170 210 220 260250220230180190190240200 220 210 210180230200 210 210 300250 230180 210 290 190210210 280210240 210 280 300200230220220180200200240200210210 200 200 200240240240 260 190 210 210180240170 200200 270250220240240 250 240 220 300240280 240 290220210240180230 220 290210220190240220210260 170 290240280 240 290210230260220200220 200190170 230 240 220 240 170 240 180 280 200 290180 180 210 210 240 170 190 270 250 290 290270290240 250210230 250 210 240 190190210 250190180260190200190 290260 250 260 290 250 240 240 250 290 230 180 240 260240190 210 190 270 280 250 270 270 260210 270 260210250210270 200 200 260200210 250 250 170 180 190 190 190 180 180 200200200 180 170 170 180190 190 200 200 190 180 180 170 170 170 170 230 250 220 230 230 230 200200 210200 260250210200220200210260210210 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - D6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 122 FLYING CLO U D D R 380 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - E1 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 123 350 380 350 350 350 350 310 340 340 340 340 340 340 350 340 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - E2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 124 340 350 350 350 350 310 340 340 350 340 280 220 320 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - E3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 125 350 340 310 140 310 140 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - E4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 126 LANDIN G R D SANDY POINT R D STONEY WAY RIVER V I E W D R W JACK PINE TRL ENGLEWOOD DR RIVERVIEW RD 340 350 210 350 230 250 250 250200 200 200 220 240210 220220210 200210 210210210 220 200220 210210210 210220220210 210220 210220220 220 200220 220 200 220 220 220220210220220210220220220220220210 310 200180200180 200 200 180 200200220180180 180 200190180 200 210 220 200200 200180 200200200200200 220 210220230220220 180180 200 210 190 200 200190210190 200200 200190190200 200 200200200180200 200 190 220 200 200210200 190 210190190200 210210 210190 210 190 200230 210 200 220 210 220220220 210210220 210 200200180 200 220180 150 190 200190190220200190190190 210190 190 220170170 220 210 200 220 220 200180 180 200210200 190 190 200200 180 200180180 190 200190 210 200 190 190 210190190 220 200 200210190190190160150 180 200210200180190 210 200200200190190210190210 200190200 350 210 210 210 210 210210210 240210210210200210 200 200 220 210 210210 200 210 210 210 210 320 200190 210 200 210180180 200200180200210200200210180 180 180 200180200210200200 200180190180180200200200200200200200 180170 190 200200200180 200190 310 170 210180190160 200 200170200170200200210170200220150220210 200 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - E5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 127 FRANLO RD LEE DRPARKER DRPURDEY RD LANDIN G R D FAWNS WAY BLUFF RD S H E L T E R G R V SONOMA RDG RIVERVIEW RD300 290 300 370 200 200 200 230280 230 310250 290270290270 250 240 290290220 300 310280 290 330 320 290 280 270290 340330 330 290 300 280 310210 310 300 330 220 270200 290230 220 340 300250210220210260 330 310 310300300 330 310280 250 300260 200 310 280210210 200 320 290200240210 200 220 210220 200 210 230 210210210210 200210 260210 210210 200 200 220 220 300 220210 220 310200200210210210200 290200200210200200200 200 270 200 250 200200 200 310 280 310200210200200200310200200 280 210 210 200 260 290 200200 260 310200200200 310200200 300 200 200 290280220200200200270 200 220 200200 210 260 230 280270 320200210 200 210 220 200 270250220 210 210 210210 210210 280 210210 200 270260 210 210 210 270210210 200 210210 240 240 260 220220 230210 200 310 200 210200 300290200200200200280200200 270 300200210200210270200 200 260260 200 260 260210200200 220 240210 300 300290280270200 330200310200200220210270260200300200210200 290 320 270 250 260 270 280 310310 240 280270 240230 250 320220280 300290300 230 350 250290230220240220250270290 320240310280210270240280 380 260 320220 210 250 210250 270260210240 280 210 210 210 210 300200200 210 240 250200210 280210210220 300230200200210240300 200 210 210 220210220 250 300 220200 310250290 210210200200 230210 220 320 280 220200210210210210 280 200 210 320220 300 200 200 220 280 210200200 310200200290200200290 320270200 200 200 200 320200260250200200200200200200200200200200260210200250200200200200270240210210200240220230200200250200200210230200200200260210200260250210200 410 440390 200200200 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - E6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 128 BLUFF AVE E SHAWNEE TRL E3RD AVE E CAVANAUGH DR SARAZIN ST4TH AVE E SH E N A N D O A H D RMARSCHALL RD S 1ST AVE E COUNTY ROAD 101 370 370 350 380 340 350 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - F2 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 129 VALLEY IND U S T R I A L B L V D N 4TH AVE E CANTERBURY RD SCOUNTY R O A D 1 0 1 370 320 330 350 340 340 340 330 350 340 340 340 350 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - F3 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 130 VALLEY IN D U S T R I A L B L V D N COUNTY R O A D 1 0 1 340 340 320 350 340 310 340 360 350360 350 340 350 350 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - F4 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 131 340 340 350 340 340 340 340 350 340 350 350 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - F5 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 132 390 350 430410 370 F2 F6F5F4F3 E6E5E4E3E2E1 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 A1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 B6B5B4B3B2B1 A5A4A3A2 C6 §¨¦494 £¤212 £¤169 £¤169 5 0 1,000500Feet FCM Maximum Construction Heights Without PermitWithin Zoning Limits ²0 - 5051 - 100101 - 150151 - 200201 - 250251 - 300301 - 350351 - 400401 - 450451 - 500MCH - F6 FCM Zoning Ordinance Page 133 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Ban the Keeping of Birds of Prey Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.10. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning the keeping of birds of prey. SUMMARY OF REQUEST In 2009, staff researched the keeping of animals within the City of Chanhassen. At that time, it was determined that farm animals should be defined and limited to agricultural properties, definitions should be clarified, and wild animals and birds of prey should be prohibited. When the ordinance was adopted, the final form included the definition of “birds of prey” but did not include language preventing them from being kept within the city. Since the initial passing of the ordinance restricting the keeping of animals, changing attitudes have caused the city to permit the keeping of bees and chickens in previously forbidden areas; however, nothing has changed regarding the desirability of permitting birds of prey. Staff proposes amending this section of the Code to include the original prohibition on keeping birds of prey. A full analysis of can be found in the attached issue paper. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Sec. 1­2. – Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the terms household pets, horses, farm animals, wild animals, birds of prey, and other relevant terms. Sec. 20­1001. – Keeping. Stipulates the types of animals that can and cannot be kept within the city, what zones the animals may be kept in, and the standards that must be met for keeping them. BACKGROUND Amendment History Ordinance 80 passed in 1986 established the framework of our existing zoning code and limited horses to the A­1, A­ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Ban the Keeping of Birds of PreySectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.10.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed amendment toChapter 20 concerning the keeping of birds of prey.SUMMARY OF REQUESTIn 2009, staff researched the keeping of animals within the City of Chanhassen. At that time, it was determined thatfarm animals should be defined and limited to agricultural properties, definitions should be clarified, and wild animalsand birds of prey should be prohibited. When the ordinance was adopted, the final form included the definition of“birds of prey” but did not include language preventing them from being kept within the city.Since the initial passing of the ordinance restricting the keeping of animals, changing attitudes have caused the city topermit the keeping of bees and chickens in previously forbidden areas; however, nothing has changed regarding thedesirability of permitting birds of prey. Staff proposes amending this section of the Code to include the originalprohibition on keeping birds of prey.A full analysis of can be found in the attached issue paper.APPLICATION REGULATIONSSec. 1­2. – Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the terms household pets, horses, farm animals, wildanimals, birds of prey, and other relevant terms.Sec. 20­1001. – Keeping. Stipulates the types of animals that can and cannot be kept within the city, what zones theanimals may be kept in, and the standards that must be met for keeping them.BACKGROUNDAmendment History Ordinance 80 passed in 1986 established the framework of our existing zoning code and limited horses to the A­1, A­ 2, RSF distorts, farm animals to farm property, animals kept as part of a zoo to approved locations, commercial animals to appropriately zoned locations, and allowed other animals by conditional use permit. A blanket prohibition on nuisance or dangerous animals was also established. Ordinance 480 passed in 2009 updated and added necessary definitions, removed the clause allowing other animals by conditional use permit, prohibited the keeping of wild animals, removed the provision allowing zoo animals, and removed references to the obsolete A­1 district. Ordinance 612 passed in 2015 established a minimum lot size of 10 acres for the keeping of farm animals. Ordinance 634 passed in 2018 established standards for the keeping of honeybees on lots of one­third acre or larger. Ordinance 639 passed in 2019 established standards for the keeping of chickens on lots of one acre or larger. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city ban the keeping of birds of prey. ATTACHMENTS: Birds of Prey Issue Paper CITY OT CIIANIIASSII'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJ: Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Ban Keeping Birds of Prey ISSUE Language banning the keeping ofbirds of prey within the city was unintentionally omiued from the passed version of ordinance number 480. SUMMARY In 2009, staff researched the keeping of animals within the City of Chanhassen. At that time, it was determined that farm animals should be defined and limited to agricultural properties, definitions should be clarified, and wild animals and birds of prey should be prohibited. When the ordinance was adopted, the final form included the definition of "birds of prey" but did not include language preventing them from being kept within the city. Since the initial passing ofthe ordinance restricting the keeping of animals, changing attitudes have caused the city to permit the keeping ofbees and chickens in previously forbidden areas; however, nothing has changed regarding the desirability of permitting birds of prey. Staff proposes amending this section ofthe Code to include the original prohibition on keeping birds ofprey. RELEVANT CITY CODE Sec. l-2. - Rules of Construction and Definitions. Defines the terms household pets, horses, farm animals, wild animals, birds of prey, and other relevant terms. Sec. 20- 1001 . - Keeping. Stipulates the types of animals that can and cannot be kept within the city, what zones the animals may be kept in, and the standards that must be met for keeping them. PH 952.227.1100. www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us. FX 952.227.1110 77OO MARKET BOULEVARD.PO BOX ]47. CHANHASSEN .I'IINNESOTA 55517 DATE: Planning Commission Ban Keeping Birds of Prey November 19,2019 Page 2 Amendmenl Hktory Ordinance 80 passed in 1986 establishing the framework ofour existing zoning code and limiting horses to the A-1, A-2, RSF distorts, farm animals to farm property, animals kept as part ofa zoo to approved locations, commercial animals to appropriately zoned locations, and allowing other animals by conditional use permit. A blanket prohibition on nuisance or dangerous animals was also established. Ordinance 480 passed in 2009 updated and added necessary definitions, removed the clause allowing other animals by conditional use permit, prohibited the keeping of wild animals, removed the provision allowing zoo animals, and removed references to the obsolete A-1 district. Ordinance 612 passed in 2015 established a minimum lot size of l0 acres for the keeping of farm animals Ordinance 634 passed in 2018 established standards for the keeping of honeybees on lots ofone- third acre or larger. Ordinance 639 passed in 2019 established standards for the keeping ofchickens on lots ofone acre or larger. ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the staff reports, draft ordinances, and verbatim minutes associated with ordinance 480 and found a discrepancy between two draft versions of the ordinance. It appears that when a combined ordinance including both the Chapter 20 and Chapter 1 amendments was created, the prohibition on birds ofprey was omitted. From the text of the reports and verbatim minutes, this does not appear to have been a deliberate change, and staffbelieves the intention was to prohibit the keeping of both birds of prey and wild animals. The keeping ofbirds ofprey is heavily regulated under both state and federal law, with any prospective falconer needing a state permit, extensive coursework, and a multi-year apprenticeship. Limits on the number and type of birds owned and the facilities they are kept in are established and enforced by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Further restrictions on the trapping and keeping ofbirds ofprey are established by various federal laws. As a matter of practicality, ifany resident ofthe city were believed to be keeping birds ofprey without a lalconry permit, staff would refer the matter to the DNR for enforcement. The city feels it is necessary to prohibit the keeping ofbirds ofprey within the city due to the potential incompatibility between these birds and other animals ttpically kept in a residential context. Many animals typically kept as household pets have a strong fear reaction to the calls and sight ofbirds ofprey, and ifa bird ofprey were to escape, it could pose a significant threat 2 Planning Commission Ban Keeping Birds of Prey November 19,2019 Page 3 to other animals. In general, staff does not believe it is good practice to allow the keeping of predatory animals within a suburban area. I ) Do nothing. Falconry is already heavily licensed and regulated by the state and federal govemment. 2) Amend Sec. 20-1001 to include the intended provision banning the keeping ofbirds of prey. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Altemative 2. The proposed amendments would read as follows Sec. 20-1001. - Keeping The following animals may be kept in the city: (1) Household pets are an allowed use in all zoning districts. (2) Horses in the A-2, RR and RSF zoning districts in accordance with chapter 5, article m. (3) Honey bees in accordance with chapter 5, article IV. (4) Chickens in accordance with chapter 5, article V. (5) Farm animals are an allowed use on all farm property zoned A2 or RR, which permit agricultural use, with a minimum parcel area of ten acres, except as otherwise specifically provided in the City Code. Farm animals may not be confined in a pen, feed lot or building within 100 feet ofany residential dwelling not owned or leased by the farmer. (6) Wild animals and birds of prey may not be kept in the city. (7) Animals may only be kept for commercial purposes if authorized in the zoning district where the animals are located. (8) Animals may not be kept if they cause a nuisance or endanger the health or safety of the community. glplan\city code\2o19U019{5 vatious\birds ofprey\birds of prey issue paper.docx J ALTERNATIVES PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Amendment to Chanhassen City Code to Remove Obsolete Parking Lot Configuration Graphic Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.11. Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, Associate Planner File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment to Chapter 20 concerning parking stall and drive aisle standards. SUMMARY OF REQUEST During the review of a recently proposed parking lot plan, Engineering staff noticed that there was a discrepancy between the tables and clarifying graphic in section 20­1118. The graphic seemed to indicate that an aisle width of 13.5 feet would be permitted; however, the text of the ordinance required a 15­foot aisle width. The City Attorney advised staff that the most recent ordinance would take precedence and recommended that the conflicting graphic be removed. A full analysis can be found in the attached issue paper. APPLICATION REGULATIONS Sec. 20­1118. – Design of Parking Stalls and Drive Aisles. Lists the design standards for parking lot stalls and drive aisles, and contains clarifying tables and graphics. BACKGROUND Sec. 20­1118. – Design of Parking Stalls and Drive Aisles. Lists the design standards for parking lot stalls and drive aisles, and contains clarifying tables and graphics. Amendment History Ordinance 80 passed in 1986 established the framework of our existing zoning code and required parking stalls and areas to meet the standards set forth in the city’s Design Handbook. Ordinance 117 passed in 1990 added specific parking lot design standards to the City Code. These standards required an 8.5­foot by 18­foot parking stall and allowed for 45­degree angle parking stalls to 13.5­foot wide one­way aisles. A clarifying graphic was adopted as part of this ordinance. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFFREPORTTuesday, November 19, 2019SubjectAmendment to Chanhassen City Code to Remove Obsolete Parking Lot Configuration GraphicSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: B.11.Prepared By MacKenzie Young­Walters, AssociatePlanner File No: PROPOSED MOTION:The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment toChapter 20 concerning parking stall and drive aisle standards.SUMMARY OF REQUESTDuring the review of a recently proposed parking lot plan, Engineering staff noticed that there was a discrepancybetween the tables and clarifying graphic in section 20­1118. The graphic seemed to indicate that an aisle width of 13.5feet would be permitted; however, the text of the ordinance required a 15­foot aisle width. The City Attorney advisedstaff that the most recent ordinance would take precedence and recommended that the conflicting graphic be removed.A full analysis can be found in the attached issue paper.APPLICATION REGULATIONSSec. 20­1118. – Design of Parking Stalls and Drive Aisles. Lists the design standards for parking lot stalls and driveaisles, and contains clarifying tables and graphics.BACKGROUNDSec. 20­1118. – Design of Parking Stalls and Drive Aisles. Lists the design standards for parking lot stalls and driveaisles, and contains clarifying tables and graphics.Amendment HistoryOrdinance 80 passed in 1986 established the framework of our existing zoning code and required parking stalls andareas to meet the standards set forth in the city’s Design Handbook.Ordinance 117 passed in 1990 added specific parking lot design standards to the City Code. These standards requiredan 8.5­foot by 18­foot parking stall and allowed for 45­degree angle parking stalls to 13.5­foot wide one­way aisles. A clarifying graphic was adopted as part of this ordinance. Ordinance 321 passed in 2001 removed a provision allowing for aisles not located between two rows of ninety­degree angle parking spaces to be twenty­two feet wide. Ordinance 377 passed in 2004 changed the stall requirements to 9­feet by 18­feet and increased the aisle width for 45­degree angle parking stalls to 15 feet. The pre­existing graphic was not mentioned or depicted in the amending ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the city remove the conflicting parking lot graphic. ATTACHMENTS: Parking Lot Graphic Issue Paper CNYMCIIAI'IIIASSXI'I Chanhassen is a Community for Life - Providing for Today and Planning for Tomorrow MEMORANDUM FROM: Planning Commission MacKenzie Young-Walters, Associate Planner November 19,2019 Incorrect Parking Aisle Graphic DATE: SUBJ: ISSUE The clariSing graphic in section 20-1 I l8 ofthe City Code is from 1990 and does not depict the ordinance's current standards. SUMMARY During the review ofa recently proposed parking lot plan, Engineering stalf noticed that there was a discrepancy between the tables and clariffing graphic in section 20- 1 1 18. The graphic seemed to indicate that an aisle width of 13.5 feet would be permitted; however, the text ofthe ordinance required a lS-foot aisle width. The City Attomey advised staff that the most recent ordinance would take precedence and recommended that the conflicting graphic be removed. Sec. 20-l 1 18. - Design of Parking Stalls and Drive Aisles. Lists the desigr standards for parking lot stalls and drive aisles, and contains clarifying tables and graphics. Amendment Hklory Ordinance 80 passed in 1986 establishing the framework ofour existing zoning code and requiring parking stalls and areas to meet the standards set forth in the city's Design Handbook. Ordinance I I 7 passed in 1990 added specific parking lot design standards to the City Code. These standards required an 8.5-foot by 18-foot parking stall and allowed for 45-degree angle parking stalls to 13.5-foot wide one-way aisles. A clari$ing graphic was adopted as part ofthis ordinance. Ordinance 321 passed in 2001 removed a provision allowing for aisles not located between two rows of ninety-degree angle parking spaces to be twenty-two feet wide. Ordinance 377 passed in 2004 changed the stall requirements to 9-feet by l8-feet and increased the aisle width for 45-degree angle parking stalls to l5 feet. The pre-existing graphic was not mentioned or depicted in the amending ordinance. PH 952.227.1 I 00 . www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us . FX 952.227.tt1 0 77OO MARKET BOUTEVARD . PO BOX I47 .CHANHASSEN .MINNESOTA 55317 TO: RELEVANT CITY CODE Planning Commission lncorrect Parking Aisle Graphic November 19,2019 Page 2 ANALYSIS It appears that when ordinance 377 was passed it did not contain any provision for removing or altering the graphic appearing in section 20-l I 18. The graphic was likely overlooked due to its location at the end ofthe section; below the section on compact car parking. This location, combined with the fact that the graphic is somewhat difficult to decipher, may have caused staff to believe it depicted the compact car standards and was not related to general parking standards. Regardless of the reason for the omission since the graphic was not specifically addressed by the amending ordinance, it was not removed. Staff believes that the existing tables and text ofsection 20-1 I 18 provide sufficient clarity that a graphic is unnecessary, and that given the difficulties and expense associated with creating and codifuing a new graphic, the simplest way to resolve the discrepancy between the graphic and text would be to remove the graphic. ALTERNATIVES l) Amend section 20-l 1 18 to remove the conflicting graphic. 2) Create a new graphic and amend the ordinance to replace the incorrect graphic with a correct graphic. Staff recommends Altemative 1. The proposed amendments would read as follows: Sec. 20-1118. - Design of parking stalls and drive aisles. (a) Parking spaces shall be designed in conformance with the following: parking stalls shall have a minimum paved dimension of nine feet by l8 feet. Stall and aisle dimensions shall be as noted below for the given angle: 90 degree ) 15*18.0'45 degree 18.0'18.5'*60 degree g'.18.0'26' 8.0'20.0'Parallel +One-way aisles only. RECOMMENDATION AisleCurb Length Stall LenglhAngle 12.o', 10.0' 22', Planning Commission Incorrect Parking Aisle Graphic November 19,2019 Page 3 Dead end aisles must be provided with a 26-feet by ten feet unencumbered area at the end to facilitate vehicle tuming movement. (b) All parking areas except those serving one- and two-family dwellings on local streets shall be designed so that cars shall not be required to back into the street. If deemed necessary for traffrc safety, tum-around areas may be required in one- and two-family dwellings. (c) All parking and loading areas, aisles and driveways shall be bordered with raised concrete curbs or equivalent approved by the city. (d) All parking, loading and driveway areas shall be surfaced with asphalt, concrete or equivalent material approved by the city. (e) All parking stalls shall be marked with painted lines not less than four inches wide in accordance with the approved site and building plan. (f) All parking lots shall provide islands for traffic control as needed. (g) All parking areas shall be properly maintained in a neat and serviceable condition. (h) Up to 25 percent ofthe total number of required spaces may be for compact cars and have minimum paved dimensions as follows: 450 +One-way aisles 60' 10.0'16.o', 17.5',8.5', 16.0'90" 8.0'Parallel 16.0' J 7.s', Stall LengthCurb LengthAngle Planning Commission Incorrect Parking Aisle Graphic November 19,2019 Page 4 Aisles Compact car parking may be provided if the following conditions are met: ( I ) The parking area shall have a total size of at least 20 stalls; (2) Compact car stalls shall be identified by appropriate directional signs consistent with the city sign ordinance; (3) Compact car stalls shall be distributed throughout the parking area so as to have reasonable proximity to the structure served, but shall not have generally preferential, locations such that their use by noncompact cars will be encouraged; (4) The design of compact car areas shall to the maximum feasible extent be such as to discourage their use by noncompact cars; and (5) Compact parking stalls shall not be permiued for high tumover parking lots. g:Vlan\city codeuol9U0l945 various\parking graphic\parking graphic.docx 4 td T **t lfudc a J:3t \ til{.f r' br;1ll @'orr&'. *-'+ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject Approve Planning Commission Minutes dated October 15, 2019 Section APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item No: C.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen Planning Commission approves the minutes from their October 15, 2019 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Summary Minutes dated October 15 2019 Planning Commission Verbatim Minutes dated October 15, 2019 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES OCTOBER 15, 2019 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, and Doug Reeder MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Randall, Michael McGonagill, and Laura Skistad STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; and MacKenzie Walters, Associate Planner PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A COVERED PORCH AND WALKWAY AT 832 WOODHILL DRIVE. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. The applicant, Noreen Hoft discussed the key criteria of harmony, adverse impact, practical difficulty and economics as it relates to their variance request. She showed a short video presented by Dr. Martha Nance, a Neurologist with the Huntington’s Disease Center of Excellence at HCMC, describing the progression of her husband’s disease. Chairman Weick asked for clarification on the alternatives being presented before opening the public hearing. Jay Aos with AOS Construction explained why the proposed location for the screened in porch is the best location on the property. Brigid Klaysmat, 800 Woodhill Drive asked that the Planning Commission approve the variance to provide the Hoft’s with a screened porch to enjoy being outside. Shelby Manion, 825 Lone Eagle voiced her support for the variance as the best alternative for this piece of property. Chairman Weick closed the public hearing. After comments from commissioners the following motion was made. Tietz moved, Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 6 foot rear setback variance for the construction of a screened porch subject to the following conditions, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Provide an updated survey with permit submittals that illustrates all existing utilities on site and is in accordance with City Code of Ordinances Sec. 7-19. 3. A 10 foot wide utility easement shall be recorded in perpetuity with the property for the maintenance and repair of the storm sewer pipe and manhole located on the subject property. This easement shall extend to the southern property line in order to access the storm sewer pipe. Planning Commission Summary – October 15, 2019 2 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Commissioner Undestad noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated October 1, 2019 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Kate Aanenson provided updates on upcoming meetings agenda items, and updates on projects around town. Undestad moved, Reeder seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 15, 2019 Chairman Weick called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Weick, Mark Undestad, John Tietz, and Doug Reeder MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Randall, Michael McGonagill, and Laura Skistad STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; and MacKenzie Walters, Associate Planner PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A COVERED PORCH AND WALKWAY AT 832 WOODHILL DRIVE. Weick: This is Planning Case 2019-16 and it will be in front of City Council November 12, 2019. Walters: If appealed. Weick: If appealed. Thank you. MacKenzie I will let you begin, thank you. Walters: Thank you. So as mentioned this is Planning Case 2019-16. It is a request for a 6 foot rear setback variance for a property located at 832 Woodhill Drive and it’s for the construction of a screened porch and walkway. The property is located in the RSF, Residential Single Family zoning district. This district has a minimum required lot size of 15,000 square feet, has 30 foot front and rear setbacks, 10 foot side yard setbacks, allows 30 percent lot cover, with a maximum of 25 percent being impervious coverage. The site, oops I did not change…from last time. My apologies but the picture is right. So this is 832 Woodhill. Not 690 Carver Beach Road. The area for this site is 22,000 square feet. It has 100 foot lot depth. 120 foot lot width. Staff estimated it at about 13.2 percent lot cover so well under the 25 percent impervious limit. The property currently meets all setbacks. The rear yard setback is shown here in red and the applicant’s proposed screen porch and walkway is in blue and open walkway is in green. The open walkway would be allowed under the zoning code and about half of the screen porch and a couple feet of the screened walkway would be subject to the variance. So the applicant is proposing adding a screen porch and walkway off the rear of the home. Again the red line is the 30 foot rear setback so you can see in blue where it would be encroaching into the required setback. The applicant’s justification for the variance request is that they did not choose the configuration of the home or the placement on the lot. That the lot does not meet the required 125 foot lot depth for the residential single family district. The proposed location would be screened from neighboring properties by existing trees and landscaping. They have noted that Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 2 alternative configurations and placements are unviable due to the husband’s limited mobility and the location of living room windows and other grading on the site. When staff looked over the request staff believes there are alternative locations that a very similar or identical structure could be placed that meets city code. Open decks for example would be permitted as proposed without any variance. In terms of some of some of the alternatives, Alternative A here comes off of a door they showed here. This could be an entirely enclosed and screened porch again without a variance being required. An open walkway could be utilized here to access a 12 by 12 screen porch without requiring a variance. Similar to the one in red. If the commission were to feel that a screen walkway is needed that can be accommodated with a 2 ½ foot rear yard variance if they use a different positioning for the screen porch. Staff does agree that the lot is under the district’s minimum lot depth. However we feel that the oversized lot width accommodates that and provides a sufficient building pad to meet code. Because staff believes there is an ability to construct a proposed improvement or a similar feature without a variance staff must recommend denial of the requested variance. If you have any questions I’d be happy to take them at this time. Weick: Anyone have questions for MacKenzie? Reeder: The two lots behind this house, do you have that? Yeah. Walters: I think that’s the best picture I have in here of them. Reeder: Is that a house that you’re pointing at or is that a garage? Walters: I believe this is the garage. This is the garage. This would be the house on the property to the northeast and this would be the residence on the property to the northwest. Reeder: Okay. And those houses appear to be very much up to the street level as opposed to, they have a huge back yard is that accurate? Walters: Yeah looking at the houses on the block it looks like non-conforming front yard setbacks are much more typical than non-conforming rear yard setbacks. Things tend to be placed forward on the lot rather than pushed back. Reeder: Okay. Weick: MacKenzie I do have a question for you. Is the covered, and I can’t remember if you mentioned this or not but is the covered walkway and deck considered open or closed? Walters: They are considered closed. If there’s a rough in screen it’s not considered to be an open deck or porch so then it’s not entitled to the 5 foot encroachment into the rear yard. Weick: Okay. Even if it’s not screened? A roof would be. Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 3 Walters: Yeah if there’s a roof we’d have to consider it a closed. Weick: Okay. That’s all I had. Any questions to my left? Thank you MacKenzie. At this time I would invite the applicant to make a presentation. Noreen Hoft: Thank you very much Steve. Weick: You bet, Noreen Hoft: And hello John, Mark, Doug, Kate and MacKenzie, thank you very much. So my name is Noreen Hoft. I’m the homeowner. Weick: Can you speak into the microphone because it gets recorded. Noreen Hoft: …so I’m new at this. I’m not used to making presentations in conference rooms not to be recorded for public record. So I’m Noreen Hoft, the homeowner at 832 Woodhill Drive and I’m here to kind of embellish a little bit some of the items that I included in our written justification for the variance and to offer some background information and detail about why we really want this. So let me just suggest that the intent for this presentation is to really further address those key criteria, harmony and adverse impact. Practical difficulty and economics. Kindly enough Bob Generous in my pre-meeting with him pointed out that those are the ones I should really focus when I presented to this commission tonight. So what I want to do is first introduce the stakeholders who are in the room who are the public who are attending this evening. I’ll address those key criteria and then answer any final questions that you any of the commission members might have. Does that sound okay? Weick: Yes. Noreen Hoft: Okay. So hopefully by the end of our time together tonight you’ll feel strongly that the project and it’s associated variances or variance request not only meet the criteria but also enhances a Chan vision which I see was in the beginning of your presentation as well. That Chanhassen is a community for life. Providing for today and planning for tomorrow and in our case it’s the life that my husband and I have been living for almost 20 years now in Chanhassen and hope to have for at least another 10 to 15 depending upon the progression of his disease. So that’s what I’m hoping for. We’ll see if I get there. Now did anybody notice this year that there were more insects than usual? Anybody? Mosquitoes. Gnats. Bees. Yes, yes people on Woodhill Drive did in this wet year so you know certainly that recent condition has sparked the interest of having a screened area and I just say that because I thought I might have a little audience engagement and they did. So let’s talk about the adverse impact. Stakeholders in the room are two adjacent property owners. Doug you asked about the family behind us. In the room we have Shelby Manion. Kevin and Shelby have been living in that home since 1990. It’s 825 Lone Eagle and we share together 140 feet of our back lot line so they have 70 percent. The Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 4 other neighbor up the hill has 30 percent. Also represented tonight is a stakeholder is Brigid Klaysmat. Steve and Brigid have been living on Woodhill Drive since 1994. Is that when you moved in? Can’t remember. Yes ’94 but have been in their current home since 2003. They’re at 800 Woodhill Drive and they share 100 feet of our side lot line and that’s 100 percent of that based on the way that area of Carver Beach was plotted and the property line we share runs south to north. So when the public called for by the Chair then Brigid and Shelby can answer questions and/or address the group. Also in the room as a stakeholder is the contractor that we have chosen. Jay Aos. Aos Construction is in Burnsville, Minnesota. He’s a general contractor who has over 15 years experience. Two full time master carpenters in addition to him and he has outside expert resources that he can tap into when needed like a structural engineer but what I really like most about Jay is his values. Integrity. Quality. Communications. He has a strong Christian background that I think that helps those of us who deal with him in a customer basis to feel good about the work that he will do and that they will work together. So those are the stakeholders in the room. So MacKenzie very kindly talked about the proposed placement that we have submitted and what Bob Generous had originally estimated was a 6 foot variance and a 5 foot variance but MacKenzie I think has given a much clearer detail when he said the actual 30 foot setback line through the diagrams but wondering if there was any questions about that. Weick: And we’ll, the way we would normally is we’ll let you make a presentation. We’ll make notes of our questions and we’ll ask them at that time. It just, it will make it flow a little. Noreen Hoft: Little easier for you guys? Weick: Yep. Noreen Hoft: Okay great, thanks. So MacKenzie already showed you this picture. What you can’t see very well are the pencil marks that I did at the top of this particular diagram with Shelby’s home and her garage and then the garage and the home next door which Doug was referring to. It’s like where are those houses placed and that’s our best rough, rough estimate. No measurements. No yeah, no survey. That’s just about where they are. Okay so that was my original version of the design diagram. And you might be wondering why didn’t I actually have an architectural rendering or the design from Jay, the builder and that’s because until I get your approval, hopefully we’ll do that today, then I didn’t want him to invest his time nor did I want to invest any of our funds beyond this actual hearing and our request for the variance. Okay so there’s my house. I don’t know if any of you have had a chance to be on the property. This is a downhill view so we’re looking from the east to the west and you can see how the, there’s a setback of sorts with the sliding glass doors in our dining room that really was put there by the original family who designed this home and began to build it for the purposes of having a deck. And then the side of the house you can see where I think what proposal was that MacKenzie? Was it letter, it was red. Walters: I believe it was Alternative C. Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 5 Noreen Hoft: Alternative C so you can see what that would look like on the side of the house so just an idea of what the home looks like in it’s current condition. So here’s again a series of pictures for you. So the view on the left is, if you’re standing looking at my kitchen window and then you just stay in place and turn 180 degrees and look at Shelby’s property, the Manion’s property…that’s the view you see. So from my kitchen window I see their garage. From the sliding glass doors I still see their garage. And then from the other end, it’s hard to see. That makes me go cross eyed but you’ll see that we’re beginning to have a view from that far wall, which is the east, northeast wall to the space between the garage and the house. So I offer those pictures to say that in your proposed placement of this porch that is screened and roofed, it’s all facing a garage and an open space on their lot. That’s just kind of a FYI. So my request is for the north placement and I didn’t know about the placement by the garage which is in green I believe and that was A, B or C? Walters: That was A. Noreen Hoft: A okay so I didn’t know that one. So this is, give me a letter please MacKenzie. Walters: This would be B. Noreen Hoft: B, okay. Alright. From B you can see that we have, see the two trees on the right. I would have to take those down to be able to do the actual deck off of the face of the house that is east. That’s another view of it and downhill there from the little bridge, and as you can see the sunshine in the distance that’s the Klaysmat’s house. Okay so just some pictures. Any of those you want to see again or have a need to take a look at? Does it give you a picture? At least in your mind of what we’re talking about. Okay, great. Alright so let’s move onto the criteria. So practical difficulties. In complying with the zoning ordinance that means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this chapter so in my effort to submit the application to present I’m trying to be reasonable. We did, and already MacKenzie did a great job of presenting that you know we want an outdoor space that’s accessible to my disabled spouse and enjoyable for both of us and my little joke about the bugs that fell flat was really that I want to be outside in a screened in area. The older I get the more I hate the bugs. The slope of our property is also an issue. The further downhill you go you know the more water runoff. The more soil erosion. The closer we get to the sewer line. All those good things and MacKenzie again very well presented it. We didn’t build the house. We bought it when it was finished but we are the first occupants so we didn’t choose it’s shape, it’s location or anything of that nature. So Huntington’s Disease which is the condition that my husband has. You know you might be wondering is this appeal for us to have easier access for him which would be, he’s now using a walker. A wheeled walker when he’s out. He can get around a little bit in the house but he’s going to be wheelchair bound and so to get onto the deck, the one that we’ve proposed, he would be able to wheel himself or I would wheel him out the sliding glass door to that walkway. Our hope is that it would be screened and roofed so that there’s not a lot of bugs. We need the door open as long as it takes to get the wheelchair out and turn him around. So you also might be wondering you know why would we approve this for you when the next resident or Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 6 homeowner might not have physical difficulty and I think that that’s a you know 50/50 shot. We don’t know who will own the house next so if you approve the screened porch areas then it would be accessible for them. So I would remiss if I didn’t take 5 minutes and ask you to bear with me for 5 minutes to have you see a short video on You Tube and the neurologist who’s presenting is Dr. Martha Nance and she is my husband’s Neurologist. She heads the Huntington’s Disease Society of America. She is a physician who runs the Huntington’s Disease Center of Excellence at HCMC and she very easily and quickly just kind of describes what this disease is about. A short video was shown at this point in the meeting. Noreen Hoft: Thank you MacKenzie and thank you for listening. Sorry that the buffering didn’t allow you to see her actually speaking. So my husband is between Stages 3 and 4. His symptoms first showed up in 2009 so we’re about 10 years into the symptoms and she said 15 to 20 years is the usual cycle. With our eldercare attorney we have decided we’re going out feet first in Chanhassen. That’s where we’re going to be. We’re going to be in that house as long as we possibly can and I’m prepared to be the caregiver at home for my husband as long as I possibly can. So having this screened porch area will be for us something that will help us when we’re homebound to give us some outdoor space where he can go and I can go. I can get away. My little get away in the back yard as well. So I know MacKenzie had said some people might exaggerate, he mentioned to me when we had a brief conversation, some people might try to really stretch the truth of the disease or condition and that’s why I wanted to just have that 5 minutes of You Tube for you to hear from the expert about what it’s about. So practical difficulties. So either the garage placement or downhill on the east side, you know I mentioned the slope of our property. We have several trees we’d have to remove. We’re concerned about erosion. If they do a free standing construction Jay will speak to the expense of that and then we’re getting down into the storm sewer area. You know it used to be a creek back there. Jerry Johnson is our neighbor to the west. He was 2 months old when he moved to that property 83 years ago. Do you know Jerry? He’s a good guy. He’s a good guy. So you know he’ll tell us all kinds of history. There was a pond up here. There was a stream over here and you know so knows every, probably every inch of our immediate neighborhood. So we even have addressed that with a dry creek bed on our property as well to try to move that water along. So there are both practical difficulties and economic impact from those items I have on this supplemental information about the slope of our property. So here is a picture of the sewer. Do you see the sewer cap? Or what you call a manhole that’s in our back yard and to the left of it you can see our dry stream bed. And it would be almost encroaching on that with something on the east side. Now this is more from a harmony and adverse impact perspective. And this is really an opinion, not a matter of fact but I think that that screened porch out there in the middle of the woods will stick out like a sore thumb. If it’s tucked behind on the north side you know it’s tucked away. It will encroach on the wooded environment enjoyed by both the Manion’s as well as the Klaysmat’s and us. It also may block the Manion’s view of the wooded environment so I think that the north placement is much better than the east and the garage placement is not good for my husband. So this is a picture from the Manion’s deck to our property and you can see it’s pretty Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 7 wooded and so if we place that as proposed then that would be their view. Those trees of course will grow up but there’s plenty of them to make it private for us and you know for Shelby and Kevin, private for them. Okay so again harmony and adverse impact. For the neighbors who are here, 800 Woodhill and 825 Lone Eagle, others in the immediate surroundings I did not ask to come tonight but they would have been willing. The neighbor who is west of Shelby who is 855 Lone Eagle, Jerry at 6941 Nez Perce. 843 Woodhill Drive which has a member of the sheriff’s department, Don Ennenga and 829 Woodhill Drive which is the Mason’s former house, now occupied by a young family. So I didn’t get emails as MacKenzie had suggested but those folks are all in favor and the other neighbors are also here who can confirm and validate that that’s what those people have said to them verbally but if you need additional things in writing we’ll be happy to provide that. Okay so, that’s basically the supplemental information and my appeal to you for the variance to get approved and I just want to open it up for questions from the commission to me and we’ll go from there. Weick: Well thank you and I, sometimes I say I don’t speak on behalf of all the commissioners but I think I do speak on behalf of all the commissioners. I appreciate the work you’ve put into this. From all the angles and certainly you know taking a look at how it would affect your neighbors, your property and then also the needs that you have. The personal needs you have. Noreen Hoft: Thank you Steve. Weick: In order to want to do something like this so I think we all appreciate that. But we also you know have other things to consider as well so just from a question standpoint, you mentioned the tree removal. With your proposed location of the walkway and the screened porch, and we could certainly ask your contractor as well but would you have to remove any trees of significance to do that? Noreen Hoft: They would be maybe an inch and a half in diameter that I could actually take you know a hand saw to myself. Weick: Okay. Noreen Hoft: But the other side, east side has full sized trees. Weick: Okay. And the east side is the alternative C correct and a little bit of B? That’s the east right? Reeder: Yeah, that’s the east. Noreen Hoft: That would be helpful. Thanks very much MacKenzie. Yeah so C is the east side. Weick: C and then B is kind of sticking out there on the east. Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 8 Noreen Hoft: Yes that’s the sore thumb. Weick: Okay. And then you mentioned that you didn’t really have a chance, or you did to look at Option A. Noreen Hoft: Yeah I didn’t know that Option A was being considered. All things considered in terms of my husband’s disability, you know and again Jay can probably speak to this more than I can. We have a rather narrow kitchen door that his wheelchair may not go out as well as it will a sliding glass door. Weick: Okay. Those were kind of some of the things I wanted to clarify but I certainly would open it up, commissioners just jump in and speak up if you have questions. Tietz: No, well done. Noreen Hoft: Thank you. Weick: Mr. Reeder, anything? Reeder: Well you haven’t seen A before? What’s your thought about A? Noreen Hoft: Well that was the one to which I referred that the egress from my kitchen to behind the garage would have just a single narrow door through which a wheelchair would not move. You know so I wouldn’t be able to get a wheelchair out there. I can get a wheelchair out the sliding glass door and also I think Doug since this is the first time I’ve seen it, again it’s more opinion than having to do with code because by code it works right. So in terms of my interest for the aesthetics and you know with going to the option that we proposed you’re kind of in a treehouse. You know you’re up one level. We’ll have a view over the top of the Klaysmat’s house. You know we’ll actually be able to see over their house. Watch the leaves change. It would be a whole different experience behind the garage so aesthetics wise it doesn’t appeal to me at all. Weick: Any follow up on that or? No, okay thank you. Noreen Hoft: You’re welcomed. Thank you for your time and attention. I appreciate it. Weick: Appreciate it. At this time we will open the public hearing portion and invite anyone to come forward who would like to offer an opinion on this item. Just do state your name and address for the record and microphone when you come up. Jay Aos: I’m Jay Aos, owner of AOS Construction. Noreen has proposed hiring to me to do this project for her. So I have a number of thoughts, some of them have developed as we have discussed and things and seen the presentation through the evening. The primary concern I Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 9 would have with the proposed red Alternative C location, the grading on the end of the house there is fairly steep and there’s already a lot of erosion from water coming across the back yard and running right through that area that I’d be concerned about putting footings on that slope and the fact that there is a slope there, earth tends to travel downhill slowly over time and shift and settle and so with those footings I’d be concerned about them moving minutely inches over the years to where the posts would get out of plum and the addition could sag. Plus the concern of the erosion of water around those footings. Up on the back yard where we would like to build the screened porch we have a more level surface and water has been diverted away from that area by landscaping specifically to create a space that would work well for that in the past so. That’s my primary concern about Alternative C. Secondly my concern about Alternative A in blue behind the garage, the design of that space doesn’t allow it to really be usable for a screened porch especially with access for Noreen’s husband to get down there. The reason I say that is the kitchen door comes out at a floor level that is a couple feet off of the ground and the garage soffit across the back there is only about 8 or 9 feet off the ground as it is so we would be trying to build a screened porch with a soffit coming out at about 6 1/2 to 7 feet above the floor of the screen porch in order to keep that floor level so we didn’t have stairs or a ramp to transverse with a wheelchair which ramps are doable but not ideal. So it makes it very hard, especially in light of the fact that that door is narrow there. If they did go out the patio door where the green walkway is they’d have to go quite a ways around an unscreened area through the bugs to get to a screened porch in the back yard behind the garage. So there’s that design consideration. It just makes it very, very hard to have a useable space there that really functions well for them. In fact if it were my home personally I would not want to use that space because it’d be so far to get to it and the wheelchair would present such a difficulty to get there. Those would be my main concerns about those two alternatives. I do believe that the proposed location that we would like to build, which would require the 6 foot variance, is by far the most comfortable, enjoyable scenario. One of the reasons I say that, I know that Noreen’s husband has been a hunter throughout his life and an outdoorsman. Avid outdoorsman. I’m a hunter myself. I love the woods and for, I can only imagine if I were in a stage of Huntington’s Disease like he’s in, he would want as much time outside in his back yard in those trees and woods as he could get because that’s a place that he loves. Off the end of house in the red zone you’d have a lot of view of the yard and the street. Back in the green where we would like to build it you’re very much secluded from that and you’re really in the woods. I think it makes a very ideal spot for him, highly preferable than either other location as well. Any questions for me? Noreen Hoft: Jay could you make a comment that B in the green is a free standing 12 by 12 off the side the house. It’s like, there’s no wall. Jay Aos: I see. Okay. So the free standing idea, that would add a significant cost to the project because we would have to add structural bracing to a free standing structure as well as additional footings and posts. That would make this project quite a bit more expensive for the Hoft’s than what we are proposing to do. Weick: Okay. Any questions? Thank you. Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 10 Jay Aos: Okay. Weick: Appreciate it. Jay Aos: Yep. Weick: Hello and welcome. Brigid Klaysmat: Hello. I’m Brigid Klaysmat at 800 Woodhill Drive. Weick: Welcome. Brigid Klaysmat: So I think that, I mean watching Mike go through this process of this illness and seeing all the things taken away from him I ditto what Jay said that having that screened porch would be very important for him to be outside and having the ease of getting through is super important and I think that it would be a great addition for his life and to make her life better and I think that you guys should give her the variance. Weick: Thank you. Brigid Klaysmat: My occupation is a physical therapist so I have some experience with people with neurological diseases and see how they affect families and mobility and I think like I said it would be a really good addition. Really help them out. Thanks. Weick: Thank you. Shelby Manion: Hi. Weick: Hello and welcome. Shelby Manion: Thank you. My name is Shelby Manion and I live at 825 Lone Eagle and I don’t know how many of you are even aware of the Carver Beach area and stuff and so, and if you are you then you know the history that all of our lots were camp sites so that’s why all of our lots are 20 feet wide by 100 to 125 feet deep. Those are camp sites. So yes we’ve lived there for going on 30 years and the proposed suggestions I personally feel just do not fly. Do not fly at all. Especially the one on the west side because the whole idea is to be, to be able to experience the nature and if you put that on the west side off behind the garage there are no trees there. That is a more open area. That would be completely in the sun. You would see the street. Everything. So right away when I saw that I saw that I went, no way. The other side I could see but there again the point is of the grade. Now Noreen and Mike have put a lot into their yard in the last 2 years but a lot this year to help with the runoff that has, the natural river that ran through there from the day we moved in we would watch the river run down the hill and so to, Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 11 with that and they put in that dry river bed. That would then go into the, all the work that they’ve done to try to preserve the land and the neighbor’s property so they don’t get water in their basements. Behind where they’re proposing to do this work there, it’s wooded and you have all different size trees and everything and we as neighbors take care of those trees. We spent one weekend pruning and taking out dead trees and taking down little trees so that it would give the chance for the other trees to grow. So I feel that we as a community on our two blocks and our back doors take care of each other and my husband and I are saying give them the variance. It’s a go. Thank you. Weick: Thank you. And seeing no one else coming forward I will close the public portion of the hear and now turn to the commissioners for comment, consideration, thoughts, motions. Tietz: Well comments Steve. Weick: Yeah. Tietz: This is truly a unique neighborhood. I don’t think you will ever see one like it again. It dates back to what, 1927 I think and I think it was the Star and Tribune that used to sell, sold those lots to get people out of the city. Reeder: Is that right? Tietz: Yeah. And it, I mean we have a little bit of everything and I think dealing with a little bit of everything we have to be a little bit more lenient because everything is an odd shape and you know we just can’t apply today’s standards very well in an environment such as that. You know the site is, I’ve looked at it. It’s wooded. There’s a lot of privacy there. I really don’t think that this has an encumbrance upon anybody. I think it’s an appropriate addition to their home given what their needs are and I think it looks like that back side would be for the contractor to build onto that, getting roof lines tied in is going to be a lot easier than trying to do it, you know roof lines are always difficult to try to match up and there’s a high wall in that, it appears to be a high wall in that side of the home which would make it not easy but adaptable so those are my comments. Weick: And you know clearly we have agreement amongst neighbors about how this would look. The other thing we have to consider is you know in the future different people move in and behind and just to make sure that we’re considering you know future homeowners. Not in this house but in neighboring houses as well. Not that this is, you know I’m not implying that this is a significant encroachment on the, onto the property but it is a variance and so those are the things we do need to consider as we consider variances. And again just for clarification, if we look at the actual, for you guys I’m on page 2 of 7. We’re just talking about the blue section that juts out. The green part is open as I understand it. So we’re really talking about the blue. The blue that stands out. And I didn’t think about shape but you would know about costs more than I would. I assume that there’s cost ramifications if you change the shape, right? Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 12 Jay Aos: Yep. Undestad: And I think I would agree with Commissioner Tietz on that too that you know we’ve seen a number of variances coming through in the Carver Beach and everything down there is kind of a mix and match so, you know then again I think the neighbors have all communicated well with each other in there, that they’re all kind of in agreement with it and. Weick: Okay. Undestad: And I think the other fact that they’ve done what they could to take care of that water runoff and stuff I don’t think we want to add to that running out the back and down the hill and anything they do back there to get equipment or anything to build that deck out the back is going to turn up that ground and there could be more issues. Weick: Okay. Reeder: I agree. I think because of the way the lot is shaped they have an unusually small back yard to deal with to put a porch which is where you want to put a porch so I think the 6 foot encroachment is not very drastic, especially considering where the houses behind area. I mean this is facing their garages and I think it’s, no matter who lives in any of the houses I don’t think that we’re putting something real close to somebody else and they’ve got to deal with the way the lots are laid out and you know so I’m okay. I think the justification is the shape of the lot that they’re on and where the house is and I’m okay. Tietz: Well should I make a motion? Weick: The floor is your’s. Tietz: Okay. The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves, oh a double approves here. Approves and approves. We’re approving and approving the 6 foot rear yard setback variance for the construction of a screened porch and walkway subject to the conditions of approval and adopt the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Weick: We have a valid motion. Do we have a second? Undestad: Second. Weick: We also have a second. I will pause for any comment. Thoughts? Hearing none. Tietz moved, Undestad seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 6 foot rear setback variance for the construction of a screened porch subject to the following conditions, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 13 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Provide an updated survey with permit submittals that illustrates all existing utilities on site and is in accordance with City Code of Ordinances Sec. 7-19. 3. A 10 foot wide utility easement shall be recorded in perpetuity with the property for the maintenance and repair of the storm sewer pipe and manhole located on the subject property. This easement shall extend to the southern property line in order to access the storm sewer pipe. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Weick: The variance is approved 4 to 0. Thank you for coming in. Noreen Hoft: Thank you. Weick: And your presentation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Commissioner Undestad noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated October 1, 2019 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aanenson: I have a couple updates if I may. Weick: Yes. Aanenson: So our next meeting we have the extra week so our next meeting would be November 5th but because that’s an election day we will not be meeting so we actually have 4 weeks off. We do have items coming on your next meeting which would be November 19th so at that meeting we’re going to do some code amendments. Walters: Eleven. Aanenson: Eleven code amendments. Those were presented to the City Council last night to get their feedback so there’s some random ones all over and just give you an update of some other stuff that’s going on around town. Weick: Yes. Chanhassen Planning Commission – October 15, 2019 14 Aanenson: The Venue is pretty much almost all leased out. That’s been. Weick: Wow. Aanenson: Yes one of our former planning commissioners moved her mother there and they just love it. She’s real happy to have her mother in town and can walk to everything. Having said that Aldi’s is having their grand opening on Thursday so let you know about that. Riley Crossings, we did take a tour of that with our commission’s tours. They have a temporary CO so they are moving equipment in. Getting some of the training in but they’re hoping here in the next couple weeks to have their permanent CO so they can have residents move in. They’re giving tours also as part of that temporary CO so they’re well on their way to completion. I also want, maybe you’ve seen it but the, the construction of the Tequila Butcher, the parking lot going across the street that you saw the 24 spaces and they’re working on their remodeling so that’s under way. Last night at the City Council they approved a liquor license for Jimmie’s Old Southern BBQ. That’s kind of a takeoff of Famous Dave’s so it’s going in the old Cheers building on West 79th so we’re going to be restauranted up on West 79th so there’s about 6 liquor and seating for about 60 so. Then there’s also a couple other projects under way. If you recall Control Concepts came back with a smaller building and then less grading to get that trail crossing so they’re working on that grading right now but that project is also underway. So I think that’s the main stuff I wanted to talk to you about so we do anticipate for sure the code amendments on the 19th. The only wild card out there is the Perkin’s site. They’re looking at potentially another user there. They may want a drive thru. It’s a PUD that restricts it to 2 drive thru’s so we’re asking them to do a traffic study. One of the users is pretty intensive for traffic so we’ll see kind of so I think they’re just going to try to show what the outside numbers would be and then kind of see what they can get for the users, and I can’t read your writing. Walters: Oh a sign amendment that might be in there as well. Aanenson: Oh yeah, so as part of that they want to do a tall, another tall pylon sign. We do allow pylon signs along Highway 5 so. And then we do anticipate the brewery application coming in December and we thought they might be in in November but it looks like they’ll probably be in December so they’ve been working. We’ve had a couple meetings with them so we’ll see where they’re at so that’s where we are on applications. I don’t know if you have any questions for us of things that are going on around town but. Alright that’s all I had. Thank you. Weick: Thank you Kate. With that I will accept a motion for adjournment. Undestad moved, Reeder seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tuesday, November 19, 2019 Subject City Council Action Update Section ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS Item No: D.1. Prepared By Jean Steckling, Senior Admin. Support Specialist File No:  ATTACHMENTS: City Council Action Update City Council Action Update MONDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2019 Discussed Code Amendments MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2019 No Planning Items on Agenda Minutes for these meetings can be viewed and downloaded from the city’s website at www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us, and click on “Agendas and Minutes” from the left-side links. g:\plan\forms\development forms\city council action update.docx