Loading...
Agenda and PacketAGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Note:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Follow­up Discussion of Franchise Fee Process 2.Discussion of 2040 Comprehensive Plan B.7:00 P.M. ­ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING 1.Approve EDA Meeting Minutes dated April 23, 2018 2.Approve Release of Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement (Applebee's site­Downtown TIF District #1) C.REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EDA MEETING ­ CALL TO ORDER D.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS E.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated September 10, 2018 2.Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated August 28, 2018 3.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 4, 2018 4.Approve Consultant Contract for Reconditioning the Water Tower at 2999 Water Tower Place 5.Key Financial Strategy: Economic Development­Approve Economic Development Guidelines AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2018CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSIONNote:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Follow­up Discussion of Franchise Fee Process2.Discussion of 2040 Comprehensive PlanB.7:00 P.M. ­ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING1.Approve EDA Meeting Minutes dated April 23, 20182.Approve Release of Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement(Applebee's site­Downtown TIF District #1)C.REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EDA MEETING­ CALL TO ORDERD.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSE.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated September 10, 20182.Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated August 28, 20183.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 4, 20184.Approve Consultant Contract for Reconditioning the Water Tower at 2999 WaterTower Place 5.Key Financial Strategy: Economic Development­Approve Economic Development Guidelines 6.Approve Temporary On­Sale Liquor License Request; St. Hubert Catholic Community; St. Paul Street Evangelization Midwest Gala on October 13, 2018 F.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1.Senior Commission Update ­ Barbara Nevin and Dorina Tipton G.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE 1.Fire Department Update 2.Law Enforcement Update H.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.Resolution No. 2018­43: Approve Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easements at 765 & 775 Crossroads Court I.NEW BUSINESS 1.Resolution 2018­44: Approval and Certification of Maximum Proposed Preliminary Levy to County Auditor 2.Ordinance 635: Amendment to Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to Allow Additional Signage for Target 3.Approve Agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for the Bluff Creek Southwest Branch Stabilization & Restoration Project J.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS K.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS L.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Review of Claims Paid 09­24­2018 2.Thank you letter from Pine City dated September 13, 2018 M.ADJOURNMENT N.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor.  When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic.  All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue.  Limit your comments to five minutes.  Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor.  If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2018CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSIONNote:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Follow­up Discussion of Franchise Fee Process2.Discussion of 2040 Comprehensive PlanB.7:00 P.M. ­ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING1.Approve EDA Meeting Minutes dated April 23, 20182.Approve Release of Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement(Applebee's site­Downtown TIF District #1)C.REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EDA MEETING­ CALL TO ORDERD.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSE.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated September 10, 20182.Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated August 28, 20183.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 4, 20184.Approve Consultant Contract for Reconditioning the Water Tower at 2999 WaterTower Place5.Key Financial Strategy: Economic Development­Approve Economic DevelopmentGuidelines6.Approve Temporary On­Sale Liquor License Request; St. Hubert CatholicCommunity; St. Paul Street Evangelization Midwest Gala on October 13, 2018F.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS1.Senior Commission Update ­ Barbara Nevin and Dorina TiptonG.FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE1.Fire Department Update2.Law Enforcement UpdateH.PUBLIC HEARINGS1.Resolution No. 2018­43: Approve Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easements at 765 &775 Crossroads CourtI.NEW BUSINESS1.Resolution 2018­44: Approval and Certification of Maximum Proposed PreliminaryLevy to County Auditor2.Ordinance 635: Amendment to Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to Allow AdditionalSignage for Target3.Approve Agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for theBluff Creek Southwest Branch Stabilization & Restoration ProjectJ.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSK.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONSL.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION1.Review of Claims Paid 09­24­20182.Thank you letter from Pine City dated September 13, 2018M.ADJOURNMENTN.GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONSWelcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen CityCouncil wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is providedat every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations.Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor.  Whencalled upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic.  All remarks shall be addressed to the CityCouncil as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the CityCouncil.If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokespersonthat can summarize the issue. Limit your comments to five minutes.  Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor.  If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion.  Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed.  Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Houlihan's, 530 Pond Promenade in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event.  All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Follow­up Discussion of Franchise Fee Process Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY At the end of our last discussion on September 10, the city council asked for some direction on beginning the franchise fee process. This evening Jim Strommen will be here to walk through these next steps.  The information below is being carried over from the September 10 report for reference. BACKGROUND Since the August 20th public meeting, staff has been working on updating the revolving assessment construction fund projections with current data.  Since we initially prepared the projections that resulted in a Franchise Fee of $4­$6 for residential property owners, the fund has had an audit completed with a more accurate year­end fund balance, street projects have been put on hold and estimated start dates for some projects have now been revised, and prior projections that had anticipated Franchise Fee revenues would already be coming into the fund late in 2018.  We have updated the franchise fee revenue stream to now be coming into the fund in the second half of 2019. With all of those changes, staff has put together some scenarios with the updated information.  In order for the fund to remain with a positive balance for 14 years (thru 2033) an additional $1.9M is needed either from a franchise fee or property tax increase.  We've prepared three scenarios with a franchise fee split of 50/50, 60/40 and 70/30 (Residential/Commercial) in order for you to see the comparison of each to what a property tax levy increase would look like. The following assumptions were used in preparing these scenarios: 1. The current special assessment practice would stay in place at the current ratio (60/40). 2. The current levy of $384,000 would stay in place. 3. Special Assessments will be repaid at the current rate of 5.75%. 4. Construction costs will increase at 3% per yea I have included a spreadsheet that breaks down the results for each scenario as well as a property tax levy increase to pay for the additional $1.9M. We put this together to give the council some perspective on where the fund sits at this point in time. These scenarios are by no means the only possibilities to consider. The discontinuing of the assessment practice, use of a property tax levy or franchise fee, and breakout of a franchise fee (if used) between residential and commercial properties all could be changed. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectFollow­up Discussion of Franchise Fee ProcessSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: SUMMARYAt the end of our last discussion on September 10, the city council asked for some direction on beginning the franchisefee process. This evening Jim Strommen will be here to walk through these next steps.  The information below is beingcarried over from the September 10 report for reference.BACKGROUNDSince the August 20th public meeting, staff has been working on updating the revolving assessment construction fundprojections with current data.  Since we initially prepared the projections that resulted in a Franchise Fee of $4­$6 forresidential property owners, the fund has had an audit completed with a more accurate year­end fund balance, streetprojects have been put on hold and estimated start dates for some projects have now been revised, and priorprojections that had anticipated Franchise Fee revenues would already be coming into the fund late in 2018.  We haveupdated the franchise fee revenue stream to now be coming into the fund in the second half of 2019.With all of those changes, staff has put together some scenarios with the updated information.  In order for the fund toremain with a positive balance for 14 years (thru 2033) an additional $1.9M is needed either from a franchise fee orproperty tax increase.  We've prepared three scenarios with a franchise fee split of 50/50, 60/40 and 70/30(Residential/Commercial) in order for you to see the comparison of each to what a property tax levy increase wouldlook like.The following assumptions were used in preparing these scenarios:1. The current special assessment practice would stay in place at the current ratio (60/40).2. The current levy of $384,000 would stay in place.3. Special Assessments will be repaid at the current rate of 5.75%.4. Construction costs will increase at 3% per yeaI have included a spreadsheet that breaks down the results for each scenario as well as a property tax levy increase topay for the additional $1.9M. We put this together to give the council some perspective on where the fund sits at thispoint in time.These scenarios are by no means the only possibilities to consider. The discontinuing of the assessment practice, use of a property tax levy or franchise fee, and breakout of a franchise fee (if used) between residential and commercial properties all could be changed. Some additional information that has been asked for by fellow city council members: 1. What is the breakdown of tax exempt properties within the City.There are 697 tax exempt parcels of which there are 74 that have structures on them.It would be assumed that if the property has a structure it most likely would have a gas and electric bill associated with it.I have attached a map of those parcels as well as a spreadsheet with the names of those property owners and the site address. 2. What would the impact of issuing a levy for the additional $1.9M be for homes valued at $200,000, $360,000, $600,000, $1,000,000, $1,500,000.I have added the property tax impact to the previously prepared spreadsheet on the impact of franchise fees I had sent out last week. (see attached) 3. If the City wanted to issue a percent based franchise fee, would the utility companies be required to agree to a percent based franchise fee? The answer is legally yes, statute would require the utility companies to agree to a percent based franchise fee agreement (see  Minn. Stat. §216B.36). However, using percent of gross revenue versus the utility­preferred fixed monthly fee has debatable differences in fee collection totals and may become an issue with utilities and residences and businesses as the council evaluates the method. Staff has asked Jim Strommen from Kennedy & Graven to attend next Monday’s meeting.  Mr. Strommen has been asked by staff to assist with the preparation and negotiation of any franchise agreements and franchise fee agreements the city council may decide to pursue.  Mr. Strommen will also give some guidance on how the process of implementing a franchise fee agreement with the utility companies would go and how it differs from the current franchise agreements the city has in place. If the city council wants to pursue a property tax levy increase rather than a franchise fee to fund the $1.9M additional funds needed, staff is reminding to the city council that it would need to include that levy as part of its preliminary levy due to the county at the end of September if they wanted to collect those funds in 2019. DISCUSSION The guidance staff will be looking to obtain from the city council will include: 1. Will the city continue its current assessment practice? 2. Will the city use a franchise fee or a property tax levy to pay for the additional funding needed for the PMP program? 3. Will the city keep the current levy of $384,000 in place? 4. If a franchise fee is chosen, will it be a fixed or percent based franchise fee? 5. If a franchise fee is chosen, what will the desired franchise fee split between commercial and residential properties be (50/50, 60/40, 70/30)? ATTACHMENTS: Revolving Assessment Construction Fund Franchise Fee Scenarios Scenario Impacts Map of Exempt Parcels Spreadsheet of Exempt Parcels with Structure 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Project Cost2,752,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 1,900,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Assessments 40%(1,300,000) (640,000) (400,000) (760,000) (480,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) City Share1,452,000 960,000 600,000 1,140,000 720,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Fund Bal - BOY5,366,920 2,969,119 1,406,444 530,959 (852,499) (1,430,633) (1,742,535) (1,996,830) (1,980,433) (1,932,321) (2,030,453) Levy210,720 (269,986) (260,313) 107,595 107,370 105,390 105,990 334,790 334,690 336,190 610,090 Repayment57,000 266,347 369,363 433,777 556,164 633,461 697,875 739,289 769,703 624,817 586,168 Less Prepaid SpecialsProject Costs(2,752,000) (1,600,000) (1,000,000) (1,900,000) (1,200,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) Investable Balance2,882,640 1,365,480 515,494 (827,668) (1,388,964) (1,691,782) (1,938,670) (1,922,751) (1,876,040) (1,971,314) (1,834,195) Interest86,479 40,964 15,465 (24,830) (41,669) (50,753) (58,160) (57,683) (56,281) (59,139) (55,026) Fund Bal - EOY 5,366,920 2,969,119 1,406,444 530,959 (852,499) (1,430,633) (1,742,535) (1,996,830) (1,980,433) (1,932,321) (2,030,453) (1,889,221) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 $142,000.00 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 $34,000.00 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007$209,346.73 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008$103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009$64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 2010$122,387.32 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011$77,297.25 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 $64,414.38Revolving Assessment FundAssessed Share Financed Thru City 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Project Cost2,752,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 1,900,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Assessments 40%(1,300,000) (640,000) (400,000) (760,000) (480,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) City Share1,452,000 960,000 600,000 1,140,000 720,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Fund Bal - BOY5,366,920 2,969,119 2,065,644 1,515,780 772,166 438,611 216,610 (11,433) (34,344) (93,064) (367,581) Levy210,720 (269,986) (260,313) 107,595 107,370 105,390 105,990 334,790 334,690 336,190 610,090 Repayment57,000 266,347 266,300 266,300 266,300 266,300 266,300 243,300 209,300 - - Less Prepaid SpecialsProject Costs(2,752,000) (960,000) (600,000) (1,140,000) (720,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) Investable Balance2,882,640 2,005,480 1,471,631 749,675 425,836 210,301 (11,100) (33,343) (90,354) (356,874) (357,491) Interest86,479 60,164 44,149 22,490 12,775 6,309 (333) (1,000) (2,711) (10,706) (10,725) Fund Bal - EOY 5,366,920 2,969,119 2,065,644 1,515,780 772,166 438,611 216,610 (11,433) (34,344) (93,064) (367,581) (368,215) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 $142,000.00 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 $34,000.00 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007$209,346.73 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 20082009201020112012Revolving Assessment FundAssessed Share Financed Thru Bond Sale & New Facilities 2005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Project Cost1,700,000 950,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 Assessments 40% (680,000) (380,000) (560,000) (480,000) (480,000) (520,000) (520,000) (520,000) (560,000) (560,000) (560,000) (600,000) City Share1,020,000 570,000 840,000 720,000 720,000 780,000 780,000 780,000 840,000 840,000 840,000 900,000 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2012**** 1,133,539 385,450 312,580 59,256 145,403 79,123 127,321 202,858 235,790 174,993 84,551 496,492 Levy437,842 130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 1,114,690 1,111,790 Repayment627,842 737,346 775,540 831,720 699,717 673,951 705,336 666,687 673,128 653,803 682,789 682,789 Project Costs(1,825,000) (950,000) (1,475,000) (1,200,000) (1,200,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) (1,400,000) (1,400,000) (1,400,000) (1,500,000) Investable Balance 374,223 303,476 57,530 141,168 76,818 123,612 196,949 228,922 169,896 82,089 482,031 791,071 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest11,227 9,104 1,726 4,235 2,305 3,708 5,908 6,868 5,097 2,463 14,461 23,732 Fund Bal - EOY385,450 312,580 59,256 145,403 79,123 127,321 202,858 235,790 174,993 84,551 496,492 814,803 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 $122,387.00 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 $77,297.00 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$109,504.44 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013$61,193.66 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 2014$90,180.13 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$77,297.25 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2016$77,297.25 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2017$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2018$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2019$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 2020$90,180.13 90,180 90,180 2021$90,180.13 90,180 2022$90,180.1320232024202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,500,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (600,000) (640,000) (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 900,000 960,000 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 814,803 1,160,714 1,426,550 1,715,425 1,931,828 2,173,640 2,339,096 1,109,990 1,109,290 1,104,590 1,106,490 1,099,090 1,098,590 1,098,590 702,114 714,997 734,321 753,646 779,412 798,736 824,502 (1,500,000) (1,600,000) (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 1,126,906 1,385,000 1,665,461 1,875,561 2,110,330 2,270,967 2,462,187 33,807 41,550 49,964 56,267 63,310 68,129 73,866 1,160,714 1,426,550 1,715,425 1,931,828 2,173,640 2,339,096 2,536,053 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 $96,621.57 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 $96,621.57 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 $103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504.44 109,504 109,504 $109,504.44 109,504 $115,945.88 2005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Project Cost (Street Only) 1,700,000 1,695,000 1,400,000 2,255,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Assessments 40%(680,000) (678,000) (560,000) (902,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) City Share1,020,000 1,017,000 840,000 1,353,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 Other project Costs(200,000) (75,000) Tsfs in2,000,000 - Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2012**** 1,133,539 385,450 1,399,230 1,150,684 232,370 (20,859) (42,319) (31,916) (52,824) (52,829) (74,041) 366,371 Levy437,842 130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 1,114,690 1,111,790 Repayment627,842 737,346 823,528 879,726 815,680 809,235 847,040 821,253 840,556 827,652 815,052 821,472 Project Costs(1,825,000) (1,695,000) (1,475,000) (2,255,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) Investable Balance374,223 1,358,476 1,117,169 225,602 (20,252) (41,087) (30,987) (51,286) (51,291) (71,885) 355,700 799,633 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest11,227 40,754 33,515 6,768 (608) (1,233) (930) (1,539) (1,539) (2,157) 10,671 23,989 Fund Bal - EOY385,450 1,399,230 1,150,684 232,370 (20,859) (42,319) (31,916) (52,824) (52,829) (74,041) 366,371 823,622 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 $77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013$109,182 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$145,254 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 2022$96,62220232024202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,500,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (600,000) (640,000) (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 900,000 960,000 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 823,622 1,242,626 1,570,480 1,909,963 2,165,244 2,433,854 2,620,298 1,109,990 1,109,290 1,104,590 1,106,490 1,099,090 1,098,590 1,098,590 772,822 772,822 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,500,000) (1,600,000) (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 1,206,433 1,524,738 1,854,333 2,102,179 2,362,965 2,543,978 2,749,768 36,193 45,742 55,630 63,065 70,889 76,319 82,493 1,242,626 1,570,480 1,909,963 2,165,244 2,433,854 2,620,298 2,832,261 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Project Cost (Street Only) 1,410,000 1,400,000 2,255,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 Assessments 40% (564,000) (560,000) (902,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (640,000) City Share 846,000 840,000 1,353,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 960,000 Other project Costs (200,000) (75,000) Tsfs in- Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2013**** 2,600,000 1,913,767 1,507,247 445,131 43,784 (130,236) (276,971) (459,731) (626,443) (819,363) (555,811) (280,725) (49,351) Levy130,680 294,410 300,192 281,698 520,538 514,293 509,378 510,978 503,293 964,690 961,790 959,990 959,290 Repayment 737,346 805,170 879,726 815,680 809,235 847,040 821,253 840,556 827,652 815,052 821,472 772,822 772,822 Project Costs (1,410,000) (1,475,000) (2,255,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,600,000) Investable Balance 1,858,026 1,463,347 432,166 42,509 (126,443) (268,904) (446,340) (608,197) (795,498) (539,622) (272,549) (47,914) 82,760 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest55,741 43,900 12,965 1,275 (3,793) (8,067) (13,390) (18,246) (23,865) (16,189) (8,176) (1,437) 2,483 Fund Bal - EOY 1,913,767 1,507,247 445,131 43,784 (130,236) (276,971) (459,731) (626,443) (819,363) (555,811) (280,725) (49,351) 85,243 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 $109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $90,824 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$145,254 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2022$96,622 96,600 96,600 2023$96,622 96,600 2024$96,622202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 85,243 225,669 275,922 333,351 302,280 954,590 956,490 949,090 948,590 948,590 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 219,096 267,885 323,642 293,476 281,750 6,573 8,037 9,709 8,804 8,452 225,669 275,922 333,351 302,280 290,202 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Project Cost (Street Only) 1,410,000 1,400,000 1,850,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 Assessments 40% (564,000) (560,000) (740,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (640,000) City Share 846,000 840,000 1,110,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 960,000 Other project Costs (200,000) (175,000) Tsfs in467,919 Tenn Courts &61 studyFund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2013**** 2,600,000 2,395,723 2,055,163 1,581,133 1,341,497 1,334,042 1,358,870 1,352,820 1,368,119 1,362,670 1,339,856 1,319,984 1,274,418 Levy130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 Repayment 737,346 805,170 879,726 789,593 783,152 820,957 795,170 814,473 801,569 788,969 795,389 772,822 772,822 Project Costs (1,410,000) (1,475,000) (1,850,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,600,000) Investable Balance 2,325,945 1,995,304 1,535,081 1,302,424 1,295,186 1,319,291 1,313,418 1,328,271 1,322,980 1,300,831 1,281,538 1,237,299 1,091,032 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest69,778 59,859 46,052 39,073 38,856 39,579 39,403 39,848 39,689 39,025 38,446 37,119 32,731 Fund Bal - EOY 2,395,723 2,055,163 1,581,133 1,341,497 1,334,042 1,358,870 1,352,820 1,368,119 1,362,670 1,339,856 1,319,984 1,274,418 1,123,763 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 $109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $90,824 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2022$96,622 96,600 96,600 2023$96,622 96,600 2024$96,622202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 1,123,763 970,383 718,015 463,745 111,624 639,093 640,993 633,593 633,093 633,093 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 942,119 697,102 450,238 108,373 (224,403) 28,264 20,913 13,507 3,251 (6,732) 970,383 718,015 463,745 111,624 (231,135) 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Project Cost (Street Only) 1,850,000 1,560,000 1,622,400 1,687,296 1,754,788 1,824,979 1,897,979 1,973,898 2,052,854 2,134,968 2,220,366 2,309,181 2,401,548 Assessments 40% (740,000) (624,000) (648,960) (674,918) (701,915) (729,992) (759,191) (789,559) (821,141) (853,987) (888,147) (923,672) (960,619) City Share 1,110,000 936,000 973,440 1,012,378 1,052,873 1,094,988 1,138,787 1,184,339 1,231,712 1,280,981 1,332,220 1,385,509 1,440,929 Other project CostsTenn Courts &(150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2014**** 2,148,552 1,636,854 1,494,985 1,524,599 1,525,724 1,282,774 952,408 537,815 64,427 (465,327) (1,078,333) (1,754,757) (2,501,964) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 856,015 762,369 756,830 799,461 782,556 814,961 819,547 850,053 885,931 898,612 934,557 971,939 1,010,817 Project Costs (1,850,000) (1,560,000) (1,622,400) (1,687,296) (1,754,788) (1,824,979) (1,897,979) (1,973,898) (2,052,854) (2,134,968) (2,220,366) (2,309,181) (2,401,548) Investable Balance 1,604,759 1,465,672 1,494,705 1,495,808 1,257,621 933,733 527,270 63,163 (456,203) (1,057,190) (1,720,350) (2,452,906) (3,251,703) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest32,095 29,313 29,894 29,916 25,152 18,675 10,545 1,263 (9,124) (21,144) (34,407) (49,058) (65,034) Fund Bal - EOY 1,636,854 1,494,985 1,524,599 1,525,724 1,282,774 952,408 537,815 64,427 (465,327) (1,078,333) (1,754,757) (2,501,964) (3,316,737) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016$97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,5242017$101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,4252018$105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,4822019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,0902021$118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,6532022$123,400 $123,400 $123,400 $123,400 $123,4002023$128,336 $128,336 $128,336 $128,3362024$133,469 $133,469 $133,4692025$138,808 $138,8082026$144,3602027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2028 2029 20302,497,610 2,597,515 2,701,415 (999,044) (1,039,006) (1,080,566) 1,498,566 1,558,509 1,620,849 (3,316,737) (4,212,095) (5,184,882) 633,593 633,093 633,093 1,051,249 1,093,299 1,137,031 (2,497,610) (2,597,515) (2,701,415) (4,129,505) (5,083,217) (6,116,173) (82,590) (101,664) (122,323) (4,212,095) (5,184,882) (6,238,496) $114,090$118,653 $118,653$123,400 $123,400 $123,400$128,336 $128,336 $128,336$133,469 $133,469 $133,469$138,808 $138,808 $138,808$144,360 $144,360 $144,360$150,134 $150,134 $150,134$156,140 $156,140$162,385 2005 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Project Cost (Street Only) 1,850,000 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (740,000) (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 1,110,000 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & (340,000) (150,000) Tsfs in125,000 194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2015**** 1,825,583 1,088,126 221,282 984,058 974,368 720,387 (309,747) (708,601) (1,165,889) (1,679,173) (2,275,329) (2,979,150) (3,709,611) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 856,015 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 Project Costs (1,850,000) (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 1,066,790 216,944 964,763 955,263 706,262 (303,673) (694,707) (1,143,029) (1,646,248) (2,230,715) (2,920,735) (3,636,874) (4,418,870) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest21,336 4,339 19,295 19,105 14,125 (6,073) (13,894) (22,861) (32,925) (44,614) (58,415) (72,737) (88,377) Fund Bal - EOY 1,088,126 221,282 984,058 974,368 720,387 (309,747) (708,601) (1,165,889) (1,679,173) (2,275,329) (2,979,150) (3,709,611) (4,507,247) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016$141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,9562026$144,5142027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2028 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 2,704,292 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,500,162 1,560,169 1,622,575 (4,507,247) (5,385,067) (6,382,948) 633,593 633,093 633,093 1,094,447 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (5,279,478) (6,257,792) (7,315,905) (105,590) (125,156) (146,318) (5,385,067) (6,382,948) (7,462,223) $156,289$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 Assessments 40% (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) City Share 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 1,215,007 1,997,657 2,008,239 1,774,935 765,892 388,551 (46,794) (537,696) (1,111,023) (1,791,557) (2,498,267) (3,271,676) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 633,593 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 1,094,447 Project Costs (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) Investable Balance 1,191,183 1,958,487 1,968,862 1,740,133 750,875 380,932 (45,877) (527,153) (1,089,238) (1,756,429) (2,449,281) (3,207,525) (4,043,907) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest23,824 39,170 39,377 34,803 15,017 7,619 (918) (10,543) (21,785) (35,129) (48,986) (64,151) (80,878) Fund Bal - EOY 1,215,007 1,997,657 2,008,239 1,774,935 765,892 388,551 (46,794) (537,696) (1,111,023) (1,791,557) (2,498,267) (3,271,676) (4,124,785) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,956 $138,9562026$144,514 $144,5142027$150,294202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,600,281 2,704,292 (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,560,169 1,622,575 (4,124,785) (5,097,459) 633,093 633,093 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (4,997,509) (6,030,416) (99,950) (120,608) (5,097,459) (6,151,025) $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 Assessments 40% (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) City Share 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 1,215,007 1,752,143 1,512,301 1,023,564 (246,020) (889,114) (1,595,526) (2,362,917) (3,218,262) (4,186,455) (5,186,577) (6,259,266) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 429,838 423,593 418,678 420,278 412,593 408,493 405,593 403,793 403,093 398,393 400,293 392,893 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 1,094,447 Project Costs (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) Investable Balance 1,191,183 1,717,787 1,482,648 1,003,494 (241,196) (871,680) (1,564,242) (2,316,585) (3,155,159) (4,104,368) (5,084,879) (6,136,535) (7,272,197) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest23,824 34,356 29,653 20,070 (4,824) (17,434) (31,285) (46,332) (63,103) (82,087) (101,698) (122,731) (145,444) Fund Bal - EOY 1,215,007 1,752,143 1,512,301 1,023,564 (246,020) (889,114) (1,595,526) (2,362,917) (3,218,262) (4,186,455) (5,186,577) (6,259,266) (7,417,640) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,956 $138,9562026$144,514 $144,5142027$150,294202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,600,281 2,704,292 (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,560,169 1,622,575 (7,417,640) (8,701,686) 392,393 392,393 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (8,531,065) (9,875,343) (170,621) (197,507) (8,701,686) (10,072,850) $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 978,293 1,625,775 1,850,383 (217,231) 8,698 (125,994) (311,975) (576,098) (837,281) (1,268,231) (1,756,841) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 434,338 428,093 423,178 424,778 417,093 878,493 875,593 873,793 873,093 868,393 870,293 862,893 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 959,111 1,593,897 1,814,101 (212,972) 8,527 (123,524) (305,858) (564,802) (820,864) (1,243,364) (1,722,393) (2,235,122) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 19,182 31,878 36,282 (4,259) 171 (2,470) (6,117) (11,296) (16,417) (24,867) (34,448) (44,702) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 978,293 1,625,775 1,850,383 (217,231) 8,698 (125,994) (311,975) (576,098) (837,281) (1,268,231) (1,756,841) (2,279,824) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,279,824) (2,968,992) 862,393 862,393 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (2,910,776) (3,612,416) (58,216) (72,248) (2,968,992) (3,684,665) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 943,613 1,562,091 1,758,441 (342,381) (149,918) (318,747) (534,958) (831,446) (1,126,865) (1,589,574) (2,114,046) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 400,338 400,338 396,723 394,023 386,738 848,135 849,735 846,435 844,535 842,935 841,435 834,935 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 925,111 1,531,462 1,723,962 (335,668) (146,978) (312,497) (524,469) (815,143) (1,104,770) (1,558,406) (2,072,594) (2,620,285) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 18,502 30,629 34,479 (6,713) (2,940) (6,250) (10,489) (16,303) (22,095) (31,168) (41,452) (52,406) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 943,613 1,562,091 1,758,441 (342,381) (149,918) (318,747) (534,958) (831,446) (1,126,865) (1,589,574) (2,114,046) (2,672,690) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,672,690) (3,398,743) 833,935 833,935 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (3,332,101) (4,070,625) (66,642) (81,413) (3,398,743) (4,152,038) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 927,803 1,530,155 1,710,056 (407,544) (232,194) (418,479) (652,494) (967,143) (1,281,086) (1,762,689) (2,306,433) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 384,838 384,838 381,223 378,523 371,238 832,635 834,235 830,935 829,035 827,435 825,935 819,435 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 909,611 1,500,152 1,676,526 (399,553) (227,641) (410,273) (639,700) (948,179) (1,255,966) (1,728,127) (2,261,209) (2,828,172) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 18,192 30,003 33,531 (7,991) (4,553) (8,205) (12,794) (18,964) (25,119) (34,563) (45,224) (56,563) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 927,803 1,530,155 1,710,056 (407,544) (232,194) (418,479) (652,494) (967,143) (1,281,086) (1,762,689) (2,306,433) (2,884,735) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,884,735) (3,630,839) 818,435 818,435 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (3,559,646) (4,318,221) (71,193) (86,364) (3,630,839) (4,404,586) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Project Cost (Street Only) 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 2,600,281 Assessments 40% (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) (1,040,112) City Share 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 1,560,169 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in 474,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 2,689,263 990,081 1,593,678 1,774,850 (341,455) (164,782) (349,719) (582,360) (895,606) (1,208,118) (1,688,262) (2,230,517) (2,807,301) (3,551,856) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 384,838 381,223 378,523 371,238 832,635 834,235 830,935 829,035 827,435 825,935 819,435 818,435 818,435 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 1,006,925 1,094,464 Project Costs (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) (2,600,281) Investable Balance 970,667 1,562,429 1,740,049 (334,760) (161,551) (342,862) (570,941) (878,045) (1,184,429) (1,655,159) (2,186,782) (2,752,256) (3,482,212) (4,239,238) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest19,413 31,249 34,801 (6,695) (3,231) (6,857) (11,419) (17,561) (23,689) (33,103) (43,736) (55,045) (69,644) (84,785) Fund Bal - EOY 990,081 1,593,678 1,774,850 (341,455) (164,782) (349,719) (582,360) (895,606) (1,208,118) (1,688,262) (2,230,517) (2,807,301) (3,551,856) (4,324,023) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 20052006200720082009 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,956 $138,956 $138,9562027$144,514 $144,514 $144,5142028$150,294 $150,2942029$156,3062030Revolving Assessment Fund Revolving Assessment Fund - Option #2A (suggested new franchise fee)2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 Assessments 40%City Share- 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsfs in Market Blvd 194,751 194,751 (600,000) Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 3,316,243 3,426,504 4,982,777 6,046,765 5,920,761 5,573,289 5,076,599 4,254,012 3,304,630 2,222,606 1,001,878 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 842,759 720,372 643,075 533,571 445,424 357,902 242,248 204,739 - - - - - Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) Investable Balance 2,437,348 3,251,218 3,359,318 4,885,076 5,928,201 5,804,668 5,464,009 4,977,058 4,170,600 3,239,833 2,179,025 982,233 (356,706) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 65,024 67,186 97,702 118,564 116,093 109,280 99,541 83,412 64,797 43,581 19,645 (7,134) Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 3,316,243 3,426,504 4,982,777 6,046,765 5,920,761 5,573,289 5,076,599 4,254,012 3,304,630 2,222,606 1,001,878 (363,840) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,73920182019202020211 Revolving Assessment Fund - Option Levy or FF & Assess2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Assessments 40%City Share- 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsfs in Market Blvd 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 2,296,243 3,304,104 5,877,929 7,877,820 8,706,437 9,332,679 9,829,177 10,019,641 10,103,571 10,075,526 9,929,857 9,660,699 9,261,964 8,727,337 8,050,261 7,223,935 6,241,303 5,095,045 3,777,568 2,281,001 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 1,700,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 842,759 720,372 643,075 533,571 445,424 357,902 242,248 204,739 - - - - - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,600,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) (4,180,341) (4,305,752) (4,434,924) (4,567,972) (4,705,011) (4,846,161) (4,991,546) (5,141,292) (5,295,531) Investable Balance 2,437,348 2,251,218 3,239,318 5,762,676 7,723,353 8,535,723 9,149,685 9,636,448 9,823,178 9,905,462 9,877,967 9,735,154 9,471,273 9,080,357 8,556,213 7,892,413 7,082,290 6,118,924 4,995,142 3,703,498 2,236,276 585,470 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 45,024 64,786 115,254 154,467 170,714 182,994 192,729 196,464 198,109 197,559 194,703 189,425 181,607 171,124 157,848 141,646 122,378 99,903 74,070 44,726 11,709 Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 2,296,243 3,304,104 5,877,929 7,877,820 8,706,437 9,332,679 9,829,177 10,019,641 10,103,571 10,075,526 9,929,857 9,660,699 9,261,964 8,727,337 8,050,261 7,223,935 6,241,303 5,095,045 3,777,568 2,281,001 597,180 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.75%Project Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02019$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02020$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02021$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02022$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02023$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02024$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02026$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02027$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02028$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02029$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02030$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02031$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02032$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02033$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02034$0 $0 $0 $0 $02035$0 $0 $0 $02036$0 $0 $02037$0 $02038$02039 Revolving Assessment Fund - Option FF, Assess & Bond Lyman & Galpin2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Assessments 40%(1,080,000) (1,320,000) (1,140,000) (880,000) (1,320,000) (1,359,600) (1,400,388) (1,442,400) (1,485,672) (1,530,242) (1,576,149) (1,623,434) (1,672,137) (1,722,301) (1,773,970) (1,827,189) (1,882,004) (1,938,465) (1,996,618) (2,056,517) (2,118,212) City Share- 1,620,000 1,980,000 460,000 1,320,000 1,980,000 2,039,400 2,100,582 2,163,599 2,228,507 2,295,363 2,364,224 2,435,150 2,508,205 2,583,451 2,660,954 2,740,783 2,823,007 2,907,697 2,994,928 3,084,775 3,177,319 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsf's Bond Lyman&Gal 194,751 194,751 (550,000) (550,000) (550,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (380,000) (380,000) (380,000) Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 2,296,243 1,796,750 3,047,753 3,883,769 3,280,752 2,661,407 2,108,524 1,456,372 915,419 876,970 754,881 580,708 787,367 927,511 997,689 994,320 913,684 751,919 505,018 168,821 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 1,700,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment842,759 720,372 815,277 916,242 1,009,864 1,062,655 1,157,470 1,336,744 1,355,291 1,585,277 1,649,960 1,683,482 1,753,024 1,871,562$ 1,927,709$ 1,985,540$ 2,045,106$ 2,106,459$ 2,169,653$ 2,234,743$ 2,301,785$ 2,370,839$ Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,600,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) (4,180,341) (4,305,752) (4,434,924) (4,567,972) (4,705,011) (4,846,161) (4,991,546) (5,141,292) (5,295,531) Investable Balance 2,437,348 2,251,218 1,761,520 2,987,993 3,807,617 3,216,424 2,609,222 2,067,180 1,427,816 897,470 859,775 740,079 569,321 771,928 909,324 978,127 974,824 895,768 737,176 495,116 165,511 (255,872) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 45,024 35,230 59,760 76,152 64,328 52,184 41,344 28,556 17,949 17,195 14,802 11,386 15,439 18,186 19,563 19,496 17,915 14,744 9,902 3,310 (5,117) Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 2,296,243 1,796,750 3,047,753 3,883,769 3,280,752 2,661,407 2,108,524 1,456,372 915,419 876,970 754,881 580,708 787,367 927,511 997,689 994,320 913,684 751,919 505,018 168,821 (260,989) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.75%Assess $500k Market BlvdProject Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02019$172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,2022020$210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,4692021$181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,7692022$140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,3132023$210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,4692024$216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,7832025$223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,2872026$229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,9852027$236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,8852028$243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,9912029$251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,3112030$258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,8502031$266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,6162032$274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,6142033$282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,8532034$291,338 $291,338 $291,338 $291,338 $291,3382035$300,079 $300,079 $300,079 $300,0792036$309,081 $309,081 $309,0812037$318,353 $318,3532038$327,9042039 Revolving Assessment Fund - Option FF, Assess & Bond Lyman & Galpin2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Assessments 40%City Share- 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsf's Bond Lyman&Gal 194,751 194,751 (550,000) (550,000) (550,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (380,000) (380,000) (380,000) Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 2,296,243 3,151,104 5,568,869 7,409,579 7,688,231 7,753,509 7,677,823 7,284,661 6,773,291 6,699,040 6,506,241 6,189,011 6,128,843 5,939,553 5,614,722 5,147,685 4,531,527 3,759,073 2,822,878 1,715,217 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 1,700,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment842,759 720,372 643,075 533,571 445,424 357,902 242,248 204,739 - - - - - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,600,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) (4,180,341) (4,305,752) (4,434,924) (4,567,972) (4,705,011) (4,846,161) (4,991,546) (5,141,292) (5,295,531) Investable Balance 2,437,348 2,251,218 3,089,318 5,459,676 7,264,293 7,537,481 7,601,479 7,527,278 7,141,824 6,640,482 6,567,687 6,378,668 6,067,658 6,008,669 5,823,091 5,504,629 5,046,750 4,442,674 3,685,366 2,767,527 1,681,585 419,686 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 45,024 61,786 109,194 145,286 150,750 152,030 150,546 142,836 132,810 131,354 127,573 121,353 120,173 116,462 110,093 100,935 88,853 73,707 55,351 33,632 8,394 Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 2,296,243 3,151,104 5,568,869 7,409,579 7,688,231 7,753,509 7,677,823 7,284,661 6,773,291 6,699,040 6,506,241 6,189,011 6,128,843 5,939,553 5,614,722 5,147,685 4,531,527 3,759,073 2,822,878 1,715,217 428,080 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.75%Assess $500k Market BlvdProject Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02019$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02020$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02021$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02022$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02023$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02024$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02026$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02027$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02028$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02029$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02030$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02031$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02032$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02033$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02034$0 $0 $0 $0 $02035$0 $0 $0 $02036$0 $0 $02037$0 $02038$02039 Revolving Assessment Fund - Levy or FF & Assess2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034Project Cost (Street Only) - 1,900,000 2,700,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 Assessments 40%(760,000) (1,080,000) (1,320,000) (1,320,000) (1,359,600) (1,400,388) (1,442,400) (1,485,672) (1,530,242) (1,576,149) (1,623,434) (1,672,137) (1,722,301) (1,773,970) (1,827,189) (1,882,004) City Share- 1,140,000 1,620,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 2,039,400 2,100,582 2,163,599 2,228,507 2,295,363 2,364,224 2,435,150 2,508,205 2,583,451 2,660,954 2,740,783 2,823,007 Other project CostsTenn Courts & (400,000) (75,000) Tsfs in Trail 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2018**** 1,485,000 2,473,081 1,889,723 1,962,198 1,449,622 1,054,294 703,080 495,832 543,620 507,772 599,175 700,611 764,192 754,201 673,362 518,137 284,857 Levy And/Or Franchise Fee 384,838 1,084,838 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 360,000 400,000 450,000 550,000 600,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,359,128 1,384,374 1,621,259 1,744,071 1,823,181 1,871,562 1,927,709$ 1,985,540$ 2,045,106$ 2,106,459$ Project Costs- (1,900,000) (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) (4,180,341) (4,305,752) (4,434,924) (4,567,972) (4,705,011) Investable Balance 2,424,589 1,852,670 1,923,723 1,421,198 1,033,622 689,294 486,110 532,961 497,816 587,427 686,874 749,208 739,413 660,158 507,978 279,272 (29,695) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,492 37,053 38,474 28,424 20,672 13,786 9,722 10,659 9,956 11,749 13,737 14,984 14,788 13,203 10,160 5,585 (594) Fund Bal - EOY 2,473,081 1,889,723 1,962,198 1,449,622 1,054,294 703,080 495,832 543,620 507,772 599,175 700,611 764,192 754,201 673,362 518,137 284,857 (30,288) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.75%Project Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02019$121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,1792020$172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,2022021$210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,4692022$210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,4692023$216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,7832024$223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,2872025$229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,9852026$236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,8852027$243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,9912028$251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,3112029$258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,8502030$266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,6162031$274,614 $274,614 $274,6142032$282,853 $282,8532033$291,338203420352036203720382039 2035 2036 2037 2038 20394,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 5,454,397 (1,938,465) (1,996,618) (2,056,517) (2,118,212) (2,181,759) 2,907,697 2,994,928 3,084,775 3,177,319 3,272,638 (30,288) (431,252) (922,137) (1,507,197) (2,190,848) 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,169,653$ 2,234,743$ 2,301,785$ 2,370,839$ 2,441,964$ (4,846,161) (4,991,546) (5,141,292) (5,295,531) (5,454,397) (422,797) (904,056) (1,477,644) (2,147,890) (2,919,281) (8,456) (18,081) (29,553) (42,958) (58,386) (431,252) (922,137) (1,507,197) (2,190,848) (2,977,667) $243,991$251,311 $251,311$258,850 $258,850 $258,850$266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616$274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614$282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,853$291,338 $291,338 $291,338 $291,338 $291,338$300,079 $300,079 $300,079 $300,079 $300,079$309,081 $309,081 $309,081 $309,081$318,353 $318,353 $318,353$327,904 $327,904$337,741 vi al m Cr r-INI rn ro 1 CY Ln Q v n 4 lD Ol N a) U— N co' N .-1 •0 w c0 a5 > N .--1 L!1 co N a) 00 ri r-- th 0CO E m N O O U C X m LD o o O Q 4-, • ll Ln QCfL /1 L U C 00 al 0 C O u f°0 c O m v o 0 0 0 0 C C LL aS fb0 Cr •--1 •--I •--1 •--1 C (O al a1 Q V to L Ln LA m -O 6 al -0 a)fo E > cv cc O K O O> 0 rri c-I CY lD O -0COO41 in p n N m lD X tDCU O > K h N N 4 4 Nal N m LDO (1) 00 O .1 .1 m co w m Nv). .--I 1 r-1Y LL t/} t/? N N ri C L vl v? t/ C U t/} J.A. to 1 c 0 N G Vo w ra alY O f0 as0 uYcUc (0 N co cuY (0 N V E V aJ co N a50) E al 7 u — U — E O E LL 0 E U E io 0 3 E v J ELLS n3 0 g0s -a ao CO v CO Y U cc vEi c 3 vl x C Y 0 n ri LON ._ d v, al T >.Y (0 lJ 0" 0) (0 c rn o Cr) CO CY N Ql al m .-1 r-1 N r-I H -O al N Ql Ql N r LL 0) Ol O CY co N O al 00 c-I c-I Nn t/} O O O O O m Ccc V)- Co0 0, ri 0 0 c N O m LD LD m m N Q al 00 ( V Ln Ln V a) u ra co Y Oal =c m C co ro ro Y @ y C O O O O O * t c C c c O a5 c r-- n n N n a,a,a, n 4 V V 4 Vc -a a, 10 al -a al m E >J = N L N t N t O_ CC O a' O LL' O E Q @ ri m Ol (-I CY Lb a) - Q > W chi N co r- 00 e-1 I ,X O O0LACY ,i Co O m C LL a/ n 0 N n mC- a1 Q1 O .--N N al >. U 0 V OQlCYNJ CO CO ri s C Ln 4-• Y CO t/? ' O r-1 O W L U tom/} t/} N N ri t/? to VT t/? O U i/? t/T to O H 0t0 2 Y cCDL N O O L) 7 E 0 al @ 0 00 u — u Y c0 w- co f_6 c0. c _ N u E u v7alODCO4) Co)cs7 C i 2 LL C E 0 E LL n :-0)C A EUE70m h i N ' v OE O =0 IEU U 0 O N N >C a7 v, - a) -O 00 (0 CU al >6 N al E (O EJLLLI—U K vl J V) Y Y 7 = 0 0 IZ I? i 0 0 C C 0 0 6.Cr ri N O co o_ o_ a N aJ Q rl N c% t% an to A A A A44, 7 7 CL a C C vi a) 0 N m N v CC a) ,--i m to N elp, I Cr N r-N ,-i a) u- ,-1 m O t0 Cf; CU f—o > LC) al N ,-N ,-1 O O U? e-7 LID in 0 0 •,):,./ 0 o I t i/ 0 m n O O CO C x Lri v o O o Q L C to a O C — L C ° m o t) r0 C. j v o o \ \ o\° C C LL m 4 ,00000CToa)a) 4. Ln V V V 4 a ) -° a,E j C v, CC O cc 0 O> Q 11a LO 00 0Mv 0) ut 0 i 00 r•-• N cc x C I 00 O rr E LL m 00 N O2 O Li-)of Lr) V N 'i o >, n O o o N m O (0 in.in O t--)t inyVC r0 N C VO w C 7) a) O CU CO ro U T t V V w 0 6 CU ro v V E iu r0 N no a1 a) 7 7 v E O E LLL.)ft E U E To 0 3 CU E Eu 3uo 0CU Co -a m m ro v Lo c) Nr vE c 47, LC) X °ro roY N a"1O L N 0 f1 N A 7 f0 v 0- 0) ro Y c a o m m V Q) a) N m ,--I ,--N N a'-7 N -6 0) N 01 CT) N N. LL a1 0l -4 Cr m N 7 0) 00 ,--N ,-I N in O m 0 0 0 0\° o o C C N 00 m ri o o t'... C v, 0 CO L0 to rO CO N a) Y CO ,-N V Li-) Lr) V V0O C f, co7, c ° C 0 0 0 0 L 000 C C C ra r0 N N N N. N a)0a1 Q V Q 4 V V 0 a) ID a) 'B a) E > J N N L v, L7 . -C . Q w CC O CC O CC O E — Q N To N Ol Ol ,-i d' t0 a) -° O' > W .moi N N- co LO N N OO ,-i L1 X O O Lrl V ,--i 00 O CO'C U- N Ln O f\ N m 0) 0. C 00 O N O LL r0 00 O 00 00ID n. n.LT O UN N i? O a) bp 2 N C CC m CU O V 7 O C ro E 00 a) a m ro C aa) a) i N aJ Dl O 0 co .-- 1 ro aJ ro co ln N M M Ol LL C — > Ns l000 O 1--1i- O (a a) N L} in - to ro M I• I O O u C + x 1- Nd O O Q 00 lD M I, M Q i C 00 a) 0 C = c '47.• r° O mTocoD +' o-, 0 0 e 0 0O C C LL U oo 01 Ol Ol 01 C To a `) a1 Q 0 NN N N r° 0 a -a v co E QJ r° J v +L+ v L Q c ', O O oaJa' 0 I-1 an W O O7l U in p In Cr c-1 00 w X N cc N N- O al CO O >. i0 oo .--1 - L• O 00 N- I 1 tom/? L S Vim} 1-1 CO Nin- V? C U in V} in L 0 lc u co N UO u- C TO (L) y a 6 roU —c 5 U — U c tn I- L ro u ro a' E a u _ U _ EE LL L. ° E U E TO o E ooNEvu ° u o 0v a (a 0 000 i° QJ E v co E O X C CO t\ L T-1 .O L N bD 0K 0A LL N A N aJ 7 @ Q QU aJ m L-+ 7 Ql O n'1 M V N M e-4 e-1 N .--1 ry a N N Ol Ol N n LL 7 a.) ON O V M N CC 00 .--1 .--1 N- /}i 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cin in in VT 3 c N 00 Cr) .--1 O O C n O r lD l0 M M N Q aJ ..c, oo c-1 a I.n Ln v lIr.; u ro O.i, O 0 mCraToisioQO 00 y, C aJ o° N N o- oCCCCCruo 6 n n r n n u a v a v v v v J 0 CO L CO. L 7 L Q E > CC O Cc O CC O E Q u R c-I al 01 e-1 lD aJ -0vcri m lD N n a,• 0 > 00 N N- 00 .- 1 LL X O O V1 GI' 1-1 05'. 0 r»c I.L a' LI) o N- I\ ON0'' a) 0° 0 -1 N aJ >. b. O v o a C J co co00ONO L COIC I y M in t/} .-I c-1 .--I L to in (N N .--1 0 in .n cn o U in 0 N 10,0YC C 00 C O• u c E v v U m do u — u — ro ra C Y= To N To u To7CU00r° N 5 aJ D c v c v — E E LLay1oLr° E U E Tcw• a C N C aJ .-. O O a N 0 t LL EO N u m U o uin 'v, >C v E C ro ECDaJt) ca J LL H U cc N L J N Y .+0 O 0 0_ Q O O C C co O Tr' cr- i N Co 00 Q Q M N Cil aJ W N N in VT A A A A 7 7 C CLCCC Residential FF Med. Comm FF Residential FF Med. Comm FF Residnetial Prop Rax Inc Residnetial Prop Rax Inc Residnetial Prop Rax Inc Residnetial Prop Rax Inc Residnetial Prop Rax IncPer Utility Per Month Per Utility Per Month Total Annual Cost Total Annual Cost on Avg Home $200,000 on Avg Home $360,000 on Avg Home $600,000 on Avg Home $1,000,000 on Avg Home $1,500,000Franchise Fee 50/50 split 3.74$ 26.78$ 89.76$ 642.72$ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AFranchise Fee 60/40 split 4.78$ 21.10$ 114.72$ 506.40$ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AFranchise Fee 70/30 split 5.81$ 15.42$ 139.44$ 370.08$ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AProperty Tax Levy Issued (83/17)N/A N/A N/A N/A75.00$ 175.00$ 245.00$ 440.00$ 670.00$ Lotus Lake Lake Riley Lake Minnewashta Lake Lucy Rice Lake Lake S usa n LakeAnn Lake Virginia LakeHarrison R iceMarshLa ke Clasen Lake Lak e St Jo e Ch ristmasLake Lyman Blv d ( C S AH1 8 ) Lyman Blvd (CSAH 18)Pione e r Trail (C S AH14)(C S A H 6 1 )F ly in g C lo u dD rivePowersBlvd(C.R.17)AudubonRoad(CSAH15)State Highway101Hwy 1 0 1GreatPlainsBlvd Hwy 101Great P l a insBlvdState Hwy 5 State Hwy 5Arboretum Boulevard Highway 41GalpinBlvd.(C.R.117)State Hwy 5State H w y 7Hazeltine Blvd (Hwy 41)Chanhassen Rd. Hwy. 101AudubonRoad(C S A H 61 )F ly in g C lo u d D rMinnewashtaPkwyGalpinBlvd(C.R.15)£¤212 £¤212 £¤212 PowersBlvd(C.R.17)Bluff Creek DrBluffCreekBlvdCity of Chan hassenTax Exempt Parcels with and without Building Value Legend Exempt Parcels with Building Value Exempt Parcels with no Building Value µ 8/30/2018 Document Path: K:\NickLH\Projects\Finance\2018\August\Exempt Parcels with Structure 11x17.mxd PIN TAX_NAME HOMESTEADEMV_LAND 250880310 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 39600.00000000000 251820740 CHANHASSEN CITY N 1507600.00000000000 250090500 REGENTS OF UNIV OF MINNESOTA N 1921800.00000000000 252790200 CHANHASSEN CITY N 901000.00000000000 251680010 SOUTHWEST TRANSIT N 557500.00000000000 250500300 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 74500.00000000000 250220100 IND SCHOOL DIST 112 N 4994400.00000000000 253480020 CHANHASSEN CITY N 63100.00000000000 250033300 CHANHASSEN CITY N 775100.00000000000 250880550 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 39600.00000000000 250100300 CHANHASSEN CITY N 61300.00000000000 251500090 CARVER COUNTY N 699900.00000000000 253010010 CHANHASSEN CITY N 1299600.00000000000 256460200 CHANHASSEN CITY N 73600.00000000000 257740020 CHANHASSEN CITY N 1601000.00000000000 255560010 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 1067600.00000000000 253451120 DISCOVERY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH N 1745300.00000000000 252020440 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 51700.00000000000 256090460 CHANHASSEN CITY N 620400.00000000000 250880640 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 39600.00000000000 257740010 CHANHASSEN CITY N 1986700.00000000000 250122100 CHANHASSEN CITY N 1150900.00000000000 250033000 IND SCHOOL DIST 276 N 3691200.00000000000 255700030 CHANHASSEN HRA N 163500.00000000000 252030770 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 40400.00000000000 256150720 MN CONFERENCE ASSN OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENT N 1427500.00000000000 257600010 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 118800.00000000000 250110200 CHANHASSEN CITY N 5470700.00000000000 253500060 MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES N 77600.00000000000 250170100 REGENTS OF UNIV OF MINN N 2136400.00000000000 251940020 LUTHERAN CHURCH OF THE N 1029300.00000000000 251870820 CHANHASSEN CITY N 554100.00000000000 256150080 MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES N 111400.00000000000 250093200 WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH N 135000.00000000000 250041200 CARVER COUNTY N 8472000.00000000000 250880560 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 39600.00000000000 258120240 CHANHASSEN CITY N 613300.00000000000 250500010 CHAPEL HILL ACADEMY N 2101700.00000000000 256890020 ECKANKAR N ################### 250160311 REGENTS OF UNIV OF MINNESOTA N 470600.00000000000 258680020 CHURCH OF ST HUBERT N 1477600.00000000000 258482180 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 38500.00000000000 255670480 CHANHASSEN CITY N 556200.00000000000 250080100 REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN N 3150600.00000000000 251930051 CHANHASSEN HRA N 1856700.00000000000 250880660 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 39600.00000000000 252810010 FAMILY OF CHRIST LUTH CHURCH N 1056600.00000000000 257680010 SOUTHWEST METRO TRANSIT COMM N 1672500.00000000000 250570050 WESTWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH N 5997200.00000000000 250134000 CHURCH OF ST HUBERT N 116100.00000000000 258482360 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 38500.00000000000 250125200 IND SCHOOL DIST 112 N 2226100.00000000000 252620570 CHANHASSEN CITY N 540300.00000000000 251790010 CHAN CONGR JEHOVAHS WITNESSES N 1220000.00000000000 252020470 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 51700.00000000000 251910040 CHANHASSEN CITY N 743600.00000000000 251640040 U S POSTAL SERVICE N 992500.00000000000 250170400 REGENTS OF UNIV OF MINNESOTA N ################### 250040600 CARVER COUNTY N 312900.00000000000 250880630 CARVER COUNTY CDA N 39600.00000000000 250120100 CHANHASSEN CITY N 307200.00000000000 251240010 IND SCHOOL DIST 112 N 1780500.00000000000 250041300 CARVER COUNTY N ################### 251460020 CHANHASSEN CITY N 151500.00000000000 257700030 CHANHASSEN CITY N 240700.00000000000 252031170 CHANHASSEN CITY N 1800900.00000000000 258480600 WALNUT GROVE HOMEOWNERS ASSN N 0.00000000000 253000850 CHANHASSEN CITY N 305400.00000000000 251602450 CHANHASSEN CITY N 164000.00000000000 250170300 REGENTS OF UNIV OF MINNESOTA N 4128300.00000000000 250170500 REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MINN N 209000.00000000000 254400010 CHANHASSEN CITY N 160000.00000000000 250083200 MINNESOTA CAMP FIRE FOUNDATION N ################### 250136500 CHURCH OF ST HUBERT N 1088400.00000000000 EMV_BLDG EMV_TOTAL 137800.00000000000 177400.00000000000 72300.00000000000 1579900.00000000000 29200.00000000000 1951000.00000000000 8300.00000000000 909300.00000000000 3602600.00000000000 4160100.00000000000 157700.00000000000 232200.00000000000 132649700.00000000000 137644100.00000000000 18200.00000000000 81300.00000000000 10900.00000000000 786000.00000000000 137800.00000000000 177400.00000000000 18000.00000000000 79300.00000000000 1866700.00000000000 2566600.00000000000 698300.00000000000 1997900.00000000000 112200.00000000000 185800.00000000000 4106100.00000000000 5707100.00000000000 5229900.00000000000 6297500.00000000000 765400.00000000000 2510700.00000000000 128700.00000000000 180400.00000000000 41200.00000000000 661600.00000000000 137800.00000000000 177400.00000000000 1960000.00000000000 3946700.00000000000 1415000.00000000000 2565900.00000000000 19593900.00000000000 23285100.00000000000 50200.00000000000 213700.00000000000 131900.00000000000 172300.00000000000 579000.00000000000 2006500.00000000000 443000.00000000000 561800.00000000000 598800.00000000000 6069500.00000000000 228200.00000000000 305800.00000000000 381700.00000000000 2518100.00000000000 1649200.00000000000 2678500.00000000000 10900.00000000000 565000.00000000000 209400.00000000000 320800.00000000000 193100.00000000000 328100.00000000000 196400.00000000000 8668400.00000000000 137800.00000000000 177400.00000000000 21900.00000000000 635200.00000000000 6067800.00000000000 8169500.00000000000 10642800.00000000000 21080900.00000000000 180300.00000000000 650900.00000000000 18644000.00000000000 20121600.00000000000 112200.00000000000 150700.00000000000 69300.00000000000 625500.00000000000 2516700.00000000000 5667300.00000000000 3611700.00000000000 5468400.00000000000 137800.00000000000 177400.00000000000 1758700.00000000000 2815300.00000000000 2886500.00000000000 4559000.00000000000 16894600.00000000000 22891800.00000000000 182500.00000000000 298600.00000000000 112200.00000000000 150700.00000000000 4621300.00000000000 6847400.00000000000 10900.00000000000 551200.00000000000 373200.00000000000 1593200.00000000000 134300.00000000000 186000.00000000000 231700.00000000000 975300.00000000000 3192300.00000000000 4184800.00000000000 8255800.00000000000 22315200.00000000000 32300.00000000000 345200.00000000000 137800.00000000000 177400.00000000000 17900.00000000000 325100.00000000000 22912000.00000000000 24692500.00000000000 624300.00000000000 16290400.00000000000 24000.00000000000 175500.00000000000 226100.00000000000 466800.00000000000 58300.00000000000 1859200.00000000000 100.00000000000 100.00000000000 11800.00000000000 317200.00000000000 11800.00000000000 175800.00000000000 10800.00000000000 4139100.00000000000 327800.00000000000 536800.00000000000 566100.00000000000 726100.00000000000 703800.00000000000 11245400.00000000000 193600.00000000000 1282000.00000000000 SITEADD 2374 HARVEST WAY 7780 ARBORETUM BLVD 500 MARKET ST 207 77TH ST W 2200 LYMAN BLVD 7001 HAZELTINE BLVD 1720 LAKE LUCY LN 7840 HARVEST LN 7808 KERBER BLVD 201 79TH ST W 7711 KERBER BLVD 820 SANTA VERA DR 275 LAKE DR E 6999 PIMA LN 9630 BLUFF CREEK DR 7852 HARVEST LN 7700 MARKET BLVD 7610 LAREDO DR 6421 HAZELTINE BLVD 7805 GREAT PLAINS BLVD 1013 PONTIAC CT 4151 HIGHWAY 7 640 SANTA VERA DR 1456 78TH ST 410 76TH ST W 3090 82ND ST W 820 LAKE DR 3921 LESLEE CURV 0 WESTWOOD DR 6850 HAZELTINE BLVD 7830 HARVEST LN 306 78TH ST W 7450 POWERS BLVD 3160 82ND ST W 8201 MAIN ST 7729 CONEFLOWER CURV S 3675 ARBORETUM DR 7901 PARK PLAC 7854 HARVEST LN 2020 COULTER BLVD 650 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE DR 3121 WESTWOOD DR 8201 GRANDVIEW RD 7705 CONEFLOWER CURV S 7600 LAREDO DR 8300 AUDUBON RD 7011 PIMA LN 1771 LAKE DR W 3675 ARBORETUM DR 6731 CHES MAR DR 7862 HARVEST LN 2310 COULTER BLVD 2323 LAKE LUCY RD 6400 MINNEWASHTA PKWY 7681 PRAIRIE FLOWER BLVD 7110 UTICA LN 3210 82ND ST W 3335 ARBORETUM DR 2100 LAKE HARRISON RD 3300 TANADOONA DR 381 78TH ST W PID Site Address 250880310 2374 HARVEST WAY CHANHASSEN 55317 251820740 8119 Erie Circle, Chanhassen 55317 250090500 7780 ARBORETUM BLVD EXCELSIOR 55331 252790200 7220 Galpin Boulevard, CHanhassen 55317 251680010 500 MARKET ST 55317 250500300 207 77TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317 250220100 2200 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 253480020 7001 HAZELTINE BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 250033300 1720 LAKE LUCY LN EXCELSIOR 55331 250880550 7840 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN 55317 250100300 7151 Galpin Boulevard, Chanhassen MN 55317 251500090 7808 KERBER BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 253010010 201 79TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317 256460200 1801 Lyman Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 257740020 7711 KERBER BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 255560010 820 SANTA VERA DR CHANHASSEN 55317 253451120 275 LAKE DR E CHANHASSEN 55317 252020440 6999 PIMA LN CHANHASSEN 55317 256090460 9630 BLUFF CREEK DR CHANHASSEN 55317 250880640 7852 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN 55317 257740010 7700 MARKET BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 250122100 7610 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN 55317 250033000 6421 HAZELTINE BLVD EXCELSIOR 55331 255700030 7805 GREAT PLAINS BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 252030770 1013 PONTIAC CT CHANHASSEN 55317 256150720 4151 HIGHWAY 7 EXCELSIOR 55331 257600010 640 SANTA VERA DR CHANHASSEN 55317 250110200 1456 78TH ST CHANHASSEN 55317 253500060 410 76TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317 250170100 3090 82ND ST W CHANHASSEN 55317 251940020 820 LAKE DR CHANHASSEN 55317 251870820 8579 Chanhassen Hills Drive, Chanhassen MN 55317 256150080 3921 LESLEE CURV EXCELSIOR 55331 250093200 3010 W 78th St, Excelsior MN 55331 250041200 6850 HAZELTINE BLVD EXCELSIOR 55331 250880560 7830 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN 55317 258120240 2250 Stone Creek Lake East, CHanhassen MN 55317 250500010 306 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317 256890020 7450 POWERS BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 250160311 3160 82ND ST W CHASKA 55318 258680020 8201 MAIN ST CHANHASSEN 55317 258482180 7729 CONEFLOWER CURV S CHANHASSEN 55317 255670480 3950 Kings Road Excelsior MN 55331 250080100 3675 ARBORETUM DR CHASKA 55318 251930051 7901 PARK PLAC CHANHASSEN 55317 250880660 7854 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN 55317 252810010 2020 COULTER BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 257680010 650 SOUTHWEST VILLAGE DR CHANHASSEN 55317 250570050 3121 WESTWOOD DR EXCELSIOR 55331 250134000 8201 GRANDVIEW RD CHANHASSEN 55317 258482360 7705 CONEFLOWER CURV S CHANHASSEN 55317 250125200 7600 LAREDO DR CHANHASSEN 55317 252620570 1300 Stratton Court, Chanhassen MN 55317 251790010 8300 AUDUBON RD CHANHASSEN 55317 252020470 7011 PIMA LN CHANHASSEN 55317 251910040 8251 Powers Boulevard, Chanhassen MN 55317 251640040 1771 LAKE DR W CHANHASSEN 55317 250170400 3675 ARBORETUM DR CHANHASSEN 55317 250040600 6731 CHES MAR DR EXCELSIOR 55331 250880630 7862 HARVEST LN CHANHASSEN 55317 250120100 191 W 77th St, Chanhassen MN 55317 251240010 2310 COULTER BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 250041300 6900 Hazeltine Boulevard, Excelsior MN 5531 251460020 2323 LAKE LUCY RD CHANHASSEN 55317 257700030 6400 MINNEWASHTA PKWY EXCELSIOR 55331 252031170 921 Pontiac Lane, Chanhassen MN 55317 258480600 7681 PRAIRIE FLOWER BLVD CHANHASSEN 55317 253000850 7110 UTICA LN CHANHASSEN 55317 251602450 900 Carver Beach Road, Chanhassen MN 55317 250170300 3210 82ND ST W CHANHASSEN 55317 250170500 3335 ARBORETUM DR CHANHASSEN 55317 254400010 2100 LAKE HARRISON RD CHANHASSEN 55317 250083200 3300 TANADOONA DR EXCELSIOR 55331 250136500 381 78TH ST W CHANHASSEN 55317 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Discussion of 2040 Comprehensive Plan Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.2. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director, AICP File No: 2040 Comprehensive Plan SUMMARY Staff will review the latest changes made to the Comprehensive Plan and answer any questions that council members have.  No action is required at this time.  This item will be brought back to City Council for approval of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and submittal to the Metropolitan Council. The local surface water management plan was reviewed and approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on September 13, 2018. All the watershed districts have now reviewed and approved our plan. Mark Halla will be present at the work session to address City Council on his family's request for a land use amendment on their properties south of Pioneer Trail on either side of Highway 101.  Mr. Erhardt may also be present at the work session. Hard copies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan were provided to each council member. BACKGROUND City Council reviewed the 2040 Comprehensive Plan on August 13, 2018.  City Council provided direction for revisions to the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which staff has summarized in the attached report.   The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17, 2018 and voted 6 ­ 0 to recommend approval of the City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan and to submit to the Metropolitan Council for their review.  This was the second public hearing held by the Planning Commission on the Comprehensive Plan.  The first public hearing was on October 17, 2017. The July 17, 2018 Planning Commission minutes are attached. DISCUSSION The Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for the city's vision of the community as it grows in the coming years.  It establishes goals and policies to provide residents, businesses, property owners, developers, and visitors a sense of the community's values and aspirations. There have been numerous opportunities for individuals to provide input on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan including CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectDiscussion of 2040 Comprehensive PlanSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.2.Prepared By Kate Aanenson, CommunityDevelopment Director, AICP File No: 2040 Comprehensive PlanSUMMARYStaff will review the latest changes made to the Comprehensive Plan and answer any questions that council membershave.  No action is required at this time.  This item will be brought back to City Council for approval of the 2040Comprehensive Plan and submittal to the Metropolitan Council.The local surface water management plan was reviewed and approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districton September 13, 2018. All the watershed districts have now reviewed and approved our plan.Mark Halla will be present at the work session to address City Council on his family's request for a land useamendment on their properties south of Pioneer Trail on either side of Highway 101.  Mr. Erhardt may also be presentat the work session.Hard copies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan were provided to each council member.BACKGROUNDCity Council reviewed the 2040 Comprehensive Plan on August 13, 2018.  City Council provided direction forrevisions to the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which staff has summarized in the attached report.  The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 17, 2018 and voted 6 ­ 0 to recommend approval of the Cityof Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan and to submit to the Metropolitan Council for their review.  This was thesecond public hearing held by the Planning Commission on the Comprehensive Plan.  The first public hearing was onOctober 17, 2017.The July 17, 2018 Planning Commission minutes are attached.DISCUSSIONThe Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for the city's vision of the community as it grows in the coming years.  Itestablishes goals and policies to provide residents, businesses, property owners, developers, and visitors a sense ofthe community's values and aspirations. There have been numerous opportunities for individuals to provide input on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan including presentations at the Planning Commission, two public hearings, two open houses, two information stands at city events (2017 4th of July and 2018 February Festival), newsletter articles, and links on the city's website.  Here is a link to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan:  www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us/2040compplan . RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the City Council review the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the latest reviews proposed to the Plan, and provide staff with any comments or direction prior to adoption. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Staff Report Dated July 17, 2018 Planning Commission Minutes excerpt from 07­17­2018 Work Session Staff Report Memo from Don Johnson dated 9­17­2018 Alternative Sanitary Sewer Service Memo Land Use Discussion Memos Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 17, 2018 15 30. Applicant is permitted a connection to municipal stormdrain system after meeting treatment and discharge requirements of city and RPBCWD. Applicant is responsible for ensuring municipal system is capable of handling the additional capacity. 31. Applicant is responsible for any improvements necessary to the municipal system to meet capacity and regulatory requirements from the point of connection up to and including the outlet/receiving water body 32. Connection is not permitted in catchbasin. Must connect to storm main in Century Blvd. Include access manhole. Invert elevation in the manhole shall allow for 0.1 inches of fall through the structure. 33. Access MH missing from western most section of Contech structure. 34. Proprietary filtration devices should be used as pretreatment vs post treatment. 35. Identify snow storage location on plans. 36. Identify stockpile locations on plan. 37. Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD) signs and locations are required on plans. Signs are required at each point the BCOD crosses the property boundary, every 100 feet, every point of deflection. 38. Include BCOD sign detail. 39. The proposed redevelopment will need Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) permits. 40. It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure and submit proof that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project (i.e. Army Corps of Engineers, DNR, MnDOT, Carver County, RPBCWD, Board of Water and Soil Resources, PCA, etc.). 41. Project will require stormwater management fees associated with city development review and permitting process. 42. The city is in agreement with the RPBCWD comments identified in the email dated June 26, 2018 titled ‘RPBCWD Permit 2018-43: Control Concepts – Initial Completeness Review Comments.’ With one exception: J10 – the city requests applicant provide additional performance monitoring field data to support manufacturers removal estimates. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 17, 2018 16 Aller: Second item before us tonight is the review of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This matter has been before us throughout the year. We took it section by section. It’s been on the website and there have been meetings where this has been discussed. The current form has been provided and again is on the website for review. I don’t think it will take too long to move through the sections and maybe highlight the sections and the purpose of this hearing is to again take public comment on the matter before us and forward it to the City Council for final action. So at this time we’ll take that matter up. Generous: Thank you Chairman Aller, commissioners. As you stated we’ve had numerous opportunities to review this plan. We’ve had at least 8 meetings in this chamber regarding it. There were 2 open houses that the City had. We also went out to last year’s 4th of July celebration. Had a little kiosk and the Feb Festival to try to get people’s comments and interest in this document. The Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for the future development of the city. We look at as the build out plan for the community. What the land uses would be approximately and it provides the goals and policies to reaching that buildout. We anticipate that we will be fully developed by 2040. The Comprehensive Plan contains 10 chapters. The first one is an introduction which expresses the City’s vision for itself as well as we’ve incorporated all the goals and policies from all the chapters in the Comprehensive Plan right up front so people could know what our vision is and how we intend to get there. The second chapter is our land use. There were some changes that were made based on comments that we received from the review agencies. Down in the Minnesota River valley there are some wildlife refuges that were shown as agricultural land uses. We’ve not re-guided them for parks and open spaces which is what they really are and there’s no misunderstanding about what the future holds for that. The City did also, we have a 1.9 acre parcel of land off of Powers Boulevard in the northern part of the city that we’re preserving as permanent open space. People see it on the land use plan as low density residential and they want to develop it for us and so we’re taking that out also so. We do as part of the land use element there were 3 requests for land use amendments. We provided all the information in the report from what they presented in our analysis. At the present time we are not recommending that any of those amendments be adopted for the individual properties. They would have an opportunity when they came in for development to request either land use amendments or changes in the zoning and so we believe that would be the appropriate time for that to happen. Again as part of our review of this we, our GIS system has gotten better. We picked up 40 acres of land as part of our analysis. However we de-annexed 5 acres of that with Cathcart Park and that’s now in the city of Shorewood so that’s why some of the numbers have changed. The total numbers have changed over time but it’s better geographic information system analysis. As part of the housing plan we’ve looked at the, how the city’s going to meet the diversity of housing that we have in here. We’ve done our analysis for the multi-family land that say there is sufficient land available to meet Met Council targets for the community to provide housing that is affordable or work force type housing. We also discuss the different strategies that are involved in providing that type of opportunity and we acknowledges when we would use those tools and when we would not use them. Natural resources. The only change we had was about the solar, we clarified the goal on solar. We want to provide the opportunity for people to do it and in fact our ordinance does permit it already so. The City’s biggest thing is preserving our water resources and preservation of trees and diversifying our tree canopy because the rule of not having any one species dominate our Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 17, 2018 17 community because of insects coming in. Parks and trails. That we just adopted, it’s long term the City’s need for facilities that people want and it provides analysis of initiatives that the City will be undertaking in the future. Under transportation we had to expand that to show where the freight is moving. Where the trucks are actually moving on that so we got that information from Carver County as well as expansion of the light rail or the transit opportunities in the community. We showed where the park and ride lots are. There’s only 2 in the city but there are some in Chaska. Victoria’s looking at one and then Eden Prairie is the main hub for Southwest Transit. We want to provide transportation, we went through all our deficient roadways in here. We have a system classification that has a hierarchy of roadways and based on that hierarchy the city also reviews it as part of any development to preserve it’s transportation capacities. The sewer chapter looks at providing sewer to the community. Again we long term we believe that we can service everyone and our plan shows that we can do it. We provide a staging plan. Our preference is to use existing facilities rather than expanding new facilities but we show how they can be expanded and what the sizes would generally be. It has a general staging plan. There are several critical facilities that need to be constructed for the rest of the community to develop. There’s several lift stations south of 212 that need to go in before we can develop the southern part of the community. A water, we know that we need one more storage facility of approximately a million gallons and then we’ll need 4 more wells and then we should be able to supply sufficient water to service our buildout numbers. I should go back as part of the transportation element we did make all our numbers consistent this time so that each chapter has the same number. As part of our negotiations with the Met Council we were able to up our final employment numbers by about 1,400 in 2040 so they agreed with our analysis and that the total way we wanted to go but they were moving to show that we can accommodate that with our land uses. Surface water management, I’ll have Vanessa talk to you on that. And then finally in Chapter 10 is the capital improvements. That’s just a snapshot right now of what we would need over the next 10 years to implement portions of the Comprehensive Plan. Aanenson: If I may. Aller: Yes Kate. Aanenson: Planning Commission members. So our goal here tonight, because you’ve reviewed each of these and then your most recently your April 3rd we went through all this so we had jurisdictional comments which means we already had a public hearing on this whole document. This is for anybody that may be listening. And then we got feedback from the Met Council and all the other jurisdictions which would mean the DNR, surrounding communities, to making sure we’re consistent and we had some of our graphics were a little bit truncated in the publication so all those have been remedied and so this is the second public hearing, just incorporating those as Mr. Generous has gone through. So the biggest component that we were still working through, which was very complex is the four watershed districts. Making sure how with the new regs that we’re aligned with all those so Vanessa’s been working very hard on making sure that’s all consistent so that’s the biggest part of the public, we expect of the public hearing tonight. I know Mr. Erhart’s here to still talk about the land use request that he has in place so I’m sure he’ll comment during the public hearing process but I’d like to maybe give a little bit more time to Vanessa just to explain too kind of how we worked or she worked to get all that through and into the chapter for the surface water. Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 17, 2018 18 Aller: Thank you and as an additional comment this is really a dual purpose chapter because for our permitting we have to have this completed and we’ve been behind the 8 ball on that for a little bit of a while now and so it’s great that we’re coming forward and we’re catching up with all our requirements for the NPDES and other permits so please let us know what we’re doing in Chapter 9. Strong: Thank you. So as Kate mentioned this is a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. It also has it’s own rules and regulations under Minnesota Statute 103B and it’s own requirement for review and comment which means I have to send this to the 4 watershed districts as well as Met Council for approval. Since that time, after a 60 day comment period we received all of our comments back from the watershed districts. They were all very positive in we received 3 approvals with conditions. Now these of course as you know conditions can be extensive but as in Minnehaha Creek watershed district we received an incomplete and that was primarily because their plan was actually approved while our’s was out for comment. There was an overlap with that. At this point you know this version is not 30 percent bigger to have addressed all of those comments. It might not look that way but each watershed organization kind of had it’s own comments and requirements that must be included in the plan. The City wanted to take on the role of being a single stop shop so in addition to just meeting state requirements we absolutely must address everything the watershed district has asked for in order to take back that regulatory role that would improve the development process for our residents and property owners so some of these are specifically to allow us to have that role. The other issue of course which is not something that necessarily is addressed by the watershed districts is we do have an older infrastructure. We have a lot of ponds and a lot of pipe and how do we take care of that and how do we maintain that when you know there, we have over 300 ponds. Over 500 wetlands. We have 12 lakes. We are a very water rich city and that’s a lot of benefit but it’s also something you need to balance with wanting to be a very lean and responsible city so that was another issue that we’ve kind of had to address on our own. So just to give you a surface view of kind of what we covered in this update. This comment response update. So as I said each watershed district had it’s own comments and requirements that must be addressed in the plan and they must be included in the plan. Many of these requirements and most of them involve the adoption of their strategies, standards, goals and capital improvement projects. A lot of this was including their language verbatim. They’re reflected either in the plan narrative, policies or in the implementation plan. Each watershed district did have it’s own unique focus. They are all different and so they all have their own way of looking at ways that are important to them. Lower Minnesota River, many of you might assume and it would be true that they focus a lot on the river bluff standards. Unique and natural resources and features, native protection of wetlands and native areas. The Carver County WMO really wanted more focus on education and wetland and ground water protection. That was kind of their focus. Riley-Purgatory was very technical focused as well as including research studies and standards in their specific technical language that they want to make sure are included. Minnehaha Creek watershed district, their new plan if you hadn’t had a chance to read it is very interesting and it’s a good read. They really want to incorporate planning. They’re very progressive about planning now and wanting to add value into the city’s planning process and where they can come in and best fit. Help best assist the city and best work with the city. As well as then of course they were very focused on understanding our inventories and what our procedures were for implementing our surface water Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 17, 2018 19 management plan so, and then each one had it’s own capital improvement project and policies as well and standards so that’s kind of the big overview of that additional 30 percent. Aller: Great thank you. And so my follow up question would be, as a homeowner, a business person or a developer when I come in where you use the term one stop shop. Just what would be an overview of that process if I wanted to come in and do something with my property and it involved this chapter? Strong: So for example Control Concepts. When they were in here they would have to come in through the City. They have to apply through the City. You know we are required to have our own requirements but then they also then have to go through the watershed districts and that process as well and so they’re running a dual process which seems burdensome to many people and I can understand that so in the future they would just come to the city. They still have to follow the same rules and requirements but they don’t have to go through two agencies to do that now. They just go to one place. Aller: Alright, and so if a homeowner or business person or a developer wants to know what our guidance on that is they can come in and they look at this book now and they can see that, along with that process these are the guidelines and our goals with regard to what we want to do. Strong: Yep and the watershed districts will always be there as technical reference and also as a resource as well. They’re not going anywhere and they’re still the… Aller: Thank you. Any additional questions? Aanenson: I was just going to add one more comment before you open up the public hearing. So with the Comprehensive Plan there’s going to be some follow up implementation things so you’ll be seeing some ordinance changes too and maybe some of the wetland buffers. It may be some of the, yeah and surface water but there might be also too some in the code alignment too so those will all require public hearings too so there’ll be plenty of opportunities to comment on those too but as part of the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan we have a timeline to go through to get some of those in place. Again going back to the one stop shop. We used to do it that way and it’s burdensome for the developers and for residents when you’re bouncing between the two. Especially if you have to place security. Often you have to place security in both places which is very onerous, especially for homeowners so trying to reconcile that. Aller: Okay, thank you. Commissioner Weick. Weick: Are we open to questions about any of this? Can I ask? Generous: Yes. Aanenson: Sure. Weick: And this is specific to Section 8 on water. I recall having good conversations about not just being able to supply the amount of water that we think we need to supply but also incentive Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 17, 2018 20 programs potentially to conserve and encourage homeowners to use less. Is this the, in the future is this the appropriate document to start? Aanenson: That’s correct and those will be some of the implementation strategies. Weick: Yeah. Aanenson: But they look at as part of you have to show what your, how much water are you using. There’s reduction requirements so those will be some of the things. Right now we do Water Wise. We have a tiered system on our utility so those will be some of the things that we may be revisiting. Weick: Okay, thank you. Aller: And of course there’s crossover to just about every chapter here so we’ll be hitting that with the education process as well and that’s required so, yes. Strong: We do also address in the surface water re-evaluating our credit system to allow for more of those opportunities as well because again our credit system for that type of thing is, was written in 2006 so. Weick: Thank you. Aller: Okay. Nothing further from the commissioners at this point in time I’ll open up the public hearing portion of this particular item. So any individual wishing to come forward and speak either for or against or comment on the proposed 2040 plan. Seeing no one come forward I’ll close the public hearing and remind all of you present and at home that these items can be found on the city’s website for your review and that you can follow this item for action with the City Council when it moves forward. I’ll entertain a motion. Weick: I’ll propose a motion. Aller: Thank you Commissioner Weick. Weick: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and submit the plan to the Metropolitan Council for their determination of consistency with the Metropolitan System Plans. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Randall: Second. Aller: I have a valid motion and a second. Any further discussion or comment? Weick moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and submit the plan to the Chanhassen Planning Commission – July 17, 2018 21 Metropolitan Council for their determination of consistency with the Metropolitan System Plans. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aanenson: Chairman just for anybody that’s following this we will go at a work session at the next City Council meeting which is August 13th. At that meeting we’ll go through the changes in a little bit more detail and so then it will be on for a later date for the adoption so there’s an opportunity for kind of a work session with the City Council. Aller: Great, thank you. GALPIN PROPERTY: PUD CONCEPT REVIEW. Aller: Moving onto new business. We have the item for Galpin Property which is a PUD concept review. Again the City Council and the City had a process in place back around 2012 which was modified to allow for this concept review type of process. You can come before the administrative review on smaller different projects or for the larger projects like this one you come before the Planning Commission to give a broader perspective and the developer receives input and direction before making further decisions on how it’s going to move forward and the Planning Commission prefers it to be a less formal process which allows for all of you to have input at this type of concept hearing. With that we’ll go ahead and have the matter heard. Aanenson: Thank you Chairman, members of the Planning Commission. This is a concept review, PUD review. Applicant U.S. Homes doing business as Lennar. Again the work session here, excuse me the conceptual review here tonight and then the City Council will review it on August 13. As you stated the concept review is not a public hearing but is the intent to get public comment because the goal for this is to allow the developer to hear the comments from the residents in order to see how they want to advance the project. So with that I’ll give a little bit of the background. So the property as was listed by Comerica Bank who is the trustee for the estate of P.R. Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprises worked with a local broker and put this on the market and Lennar was the property developer selected for the site. So what we’ve included here is all of the property which is 188.58 acres and it is guided low density. Low density is the in the city is the largest zoning district we have in the city. It’s about 32 percent of the city so that’s a majority of the city. Within the low density district there’s a lot of different zoning applications that you can use as long as it stays within the 1.2 to 4 units an acre. So that’s kind of how we got to this point. So quite a frameworks that we looked at and when we sat down with Lennar, when they introduced themselves as the developer of the property and I’m going to kind of go through those framework issues on how we got to this proposed development. So the park master plan which is currently in place, while it’s also been reiterated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan it’s currently in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan so the park master plan around and it’s intentions around Lake Ann certainly was a major factor in how the project got laid out. The second is that there’s a Met Council sewer line that runs through it. It’s actually a large interceptor line that runs through the property. There’s significant natural features. Wetlands and in addition to that some forest, heavily forested areas which we’ll talk about and in addition the county is working on the upgrade of Galpin Boulevard and there’s been neighborhood meetings on that so all those factors come into play on how this property could be developed. So the first thing I’d like to talk about is the park master plan. As you can see on this MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director DATE: September 24, 2018 SUBJ: 2040 Comprehensive Plan BACKGROUND At the work session on August 13, 2018, City Council provided direction for revisions to the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Prior to preparing the documents for approval for submittal to the Metropolitan Council, staff is bringing back the proposed changes for review as well as providing another opportunity to discuss the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. DISCUSSION REVISIONS City Council reviewed the 2040 Comprehensive Plan on August 13, 2018. Below is a summary of the comments and staff’s proposed revisions. (Proposed revision in bold/strike-through format): Page 3, Chapter 1, Introduction, 2nd paragraph – include mention of the Landscape Arboretum as one of the community amenities. The visioning exercise summary showed that people live in Chanhassen for many reasons. The small-town feel but being within an easy striking distance of big city amenities is important. The parks, lakes, and trails with open space and recreational opportunities are important to people. Chanhassen has community values that are family friendly, promote health, engaging, and close- knit neighbors. It is kid friendly with strong schools and beautiful parks. It is a safe, neighborly place to live with low crime rates. The downtown is attractive and walkable. There are many housing choices and low taxes. Special attractions and community amenities such as the Chanhassen Dinner Theatres, Chanhassen Library, Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, Paisley Park Museum, fishing, the February Festival and the 4th of July Celebration are available. Page 4, Chapter 1, Introduction, section 1.2 Development – when referencing the downturn in the housing market, add the year 2009 for complete reference. City Council 2040 Comprehensive Plan September 24, 2018 Page 2 The City of Chanhassen is defined by the Metropolitan Council as Emerging Suburban Edge which is expected to plan for forecasted population growth at densities of at least 3-5 units per acre for new development and redevelopment. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan anticipated a faster rate of growth than what occurred. This was due to the downturn in the housing market in 2009. The city estimates that by 2040 the city will be built out with a population of 37,100. Page 8, Chapter 1, Introduction, section 1.7.2, Housing – policy encourages housing at upper limit of density. While density is given by a range in the Comprehensive Plan, tThe city shall encourage require development at the upper end of within the density range given by the Comprehensive Plan. Page 13, Chapter 1, Introduction, section 1.7.5, Transportation, policy Transit – economic and effective provision of rail transit. The city will support Federal, State, Metropolitan, and local efforts directed toward the economic and effective provision of rail transit for the community. Pages 23, 25, 26 and 29, Chapter 2, Land Use, Figure 2-4 Net Developable Residential Acreage 2020 – 2040; Figure 2-6, Land Use Table in 5-Year Stages; Figure 2-8 2020 – 2040 Land Use Comparisons; and Figure 2-10, 2040 Land Use Map: 3.2 acres of the Erhardt property be re-guided from Residential – Low Density to Office. If the City Council agrees, this change will be made to the Land Use Map and appropriate tables prior to submittal to the Metropolitan Council for their review. In addition, Mr. Erhardt had requested a dual guiding for Residential High Density use for the entire 13.2 acres of land. However as we discuss as part of the Halla analysis, the city has a sufficient amount of High Density Residential land to meet the current and futures need of the city. Existing: Residential Low Density Proposed: Office City Council 2040 Comprehensive Plan September 24, 2018 Page 3 If the Erhardt land use amendment is approved, the Office land use would increase to 190 acres and the Residential Low Density land use would decrease to 4,718 acres. The proposed change to the Bluff Creek primary zone boundary is a Zoning Code amendment and requires a separate public hearing before the Planning Commission and then a hearing before City Council for approval. Staff will bring this change back to City Council as part of our City Code revision process. Page 36, Chapter 2, Land Use, section 2.13.6, Infill Development – Add discussion of residential neighborhood development. The maturation of the city has led to an increase in infill development especially in the downtown core. In areas zoned commercial/industrial, B buildings that are no longer viable or are obsolete are being redeveloped to meet the demands of the modern marketplace. In areas zoned for residential uses, the availability of municipal services and market conditions have led to parcels being subdivided, creating new homes and neighborhoods. The City expects the amount of infill development to increase throughout the period covered by this Comprehensive Plan as the City approaches full buildout. The city is in the process of completing a downtown study/vision. The city anticipates that infill development within the downtown core will create approximately 200 new dwelling units between 2020 and 2040. While this plan does not contemplate a land use change, it will examine the existing market conditions and may make recommendations for uses and infrastructure improvements. Page 115, Chapter 6, Transportation, TH 101 South of Pioneer Trail to CSAH 61 – Acknowledge successfully receiving funding for 101 south. Proposed revision: 2020 2030 Change 2020-2040 Land Use Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres Percent Acres Commercial 142 1.2% 328 2.2% 328 2.2% 186 Office/Industrial 694 5.7% 883 6.0% 905 6.1% 211 Office 114 0.9% 339 2.3% 187 1.3% 73 Parks & Open Space 1,297 10.6% 1,410 9.6% 1,787 12.1% 490 Public/Semi-Public 1,204 9.9% 1,204 8.2% 1,211 8.2% 7 Residential Large Lot 870 7.1% 971 6.6% 950 6.4% 80 Residential Low Density 3,295 27.0% 4,707 31.9% 4,721 32.0% 1,426 Residential Medium Density 219 1.8% 400 2.7% 517 3.5% 298 Residential High Density 120 1.0% 218 1.5% 250 1.7% 130 Mixed Use 51 0.4% 115 0.8% 143 1.0% 92 Undevelopable 4,200 34.4% 4,185 28.4% 3,796 25.7% (404) TOTAL 12,206 14,760 14,795 2,589 Undevelopable Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams 2,059 2,059 Road Right-of-Way 1,244 1,244 Agriculture 882 493 TOTAL 4,185 3,796 2040 Land Use Plan Land Use Plan Land Use Plan City Council 2040 Comprehensive Plan September 24, 2018 Page 4 Minimal funding has been provided As of August 2018, nine million dollars have been allocated by the State of Minnesota for this improvement. Additional funding will need to be secured for the future improvements to the corridor. It is expected that state and local funds will be needed to help finance the improvements. Page 233. Chapter 10, Comprehensive Plan Implementation and Capital Improvement Plan, Operations, tobacco use policy – modify to be consistent with other initiative language. Proposed revision: Consider Create establishing a tobacco use policy. LAND USE AMENDMENTS In addition to the amendment discussed at the August 13, 2018 work session for the Erhardt property, the Halla family requested that their property also be reviewed for a land use change from Residential Low Density to Residential High Density. Since they did not appear at the August 13, 2018 work session, staff has advised them that City Council would be holding a work session on September 24, 2018 and they could attend that meeting. The Planning Commission reviewed the land use map amendments at hearings on October 17, 2017 and July 17, 2018 and agreed with staff’s recommendation that the land use amendments should not be approved. Halla Family There are two sites that are being requested for consideration for a land use change: Acres gross Current Land Use Low Density 1.2-4 u/a Requested Land Use High Density 8-16 u/a Halla Family LP (Golf Course) 45.04 85 – 150 units 360 – 720 units Mark Halla 12.21 Halla Family LP 12.06 Maryanne White 1.69 25.87 31 – 103 units 207 – 414 units (staff report continued on next page) City Council 2040 Comprehensive Plan September 24, 2018 Page 5 City Council 2040 Comprehensive Plan September 24, 2018 Page 6 City Council 2040 Comprehensive Plan September 24, 2018 Page 7 City Council 2040 Comprehensive Plan September 24, 2018 Page 8 Staff response to the Halla request: Staff recommends denial of the requested land use amendments. a. Based on the housing study in the 2040 Land Use Plan, the city has sufficient land guided for high density. 1) With the completion of the Highway 61 Corridor Study, there is the potential to add another 750 multi-family units between the mixed-use district and the high and medium density districts. 2) The current guiding of the Gorra property (medium and high density) has the potential for 1,000 housing units. b. There is the potential for up to 800 medium and high destiny housing units in the Avienda Development that will take place over the next few years. c. Based on the size of the subject properties, the low-density land use provides zoning districts (PUD or RLM) that would allow for the creation of unique neighborhoods using varying lot sizes. d. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan calls this area long-term for the potential development timeline. Even with the proposed reconstruction of Highway101 between County Road 61 and Pioneer Trail, there continues to be sufficient development capacity throughout the city to meet housing demand. e. The realignment of Highway 101 will require the acquisition of additional right-of-way. A land use change may negatively affect the acquisition. f. Should additional senior housing be provided in this location, there are significant public safety costs that would be associated with this type of housing, including additional fire and health services cost. g. Multi-family housing should be located in closer proximity to service and commercial areas to allow the residents easier access to such facilities. h. Multi-family housing should be located with convenient access to transit facilities. i. It appears premature to contemplate multi-family development in this area without the provision of urban services and prior to the submittal of a development review application. The property owners may apply for a Land Use Map Amendment through the normal development review process. At that time, neighboring properties would be notified as part of the public hearing process. To the north of the properties are Residential Large Lot single-family home developments, Halla Great Plains Addition, and Lake Riley Woods. To the east of the golf course is a Residential Large Lot single-family residential development, Deerbrook. City Council 2040 Comprehensive Plan September 24, 2018 Page 9 RECOMMENDATION Staff requests comments and direction from City Council on finalizing the City of Chanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, we request review and comment on the proposed revisions made after the August 13, 2018 work session. ATTACHMENTS Mark Halla Email and Attachments to Bob Generous dated 9/13/2018 From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Mark D. Halla < hallakm@aol.com > Thursday, September 1 3, 2018 8:39 AM Generous, Bob hallakm@aol.com Concept plan for higher density at Halla properties 101 Development Concept Dan Anderson.pdf Hi Bob! Thanks for getting back to me. We have also had some developers propose some concepts for single family/multi family dwellings but we liked Dan's proposal more because it brings higher value to us as land owners, higher tax base to the city, and more open space overall. Thanks for getting this into the packet. Blessings, Mark D. Halla Steward, The Mustard Seed, lnc. www.TheMustardSeedl nc.com To See Our 3 Minute VideS.elp!"llqCl w. 952-361 -9954, C. 952-261 -9654 L_ I tt. C 1u ;Enil --- {t. I t}0 Il^It I tjN B a i- @l--tt i I I \ ) l, l qffi $sIJ2 l MLsPf a{T " -€tolfl C(xrt*-- @ ) / /I -NoulL b}}wtrwry- ,,"tr;e?#J ilt i<=q 6ru wl4>v/ so,'tz'4L ffiEl ------M \ mffiqTcrt-S N:>N- {=-r\- 1 lo ,l tZ 11 { ; z1 \ \ n/*1* FARK ; G'sl\nt+---li-t:l_'!3: _)l N : J CITY OT CHANHASSXI'I Chanhasen is a Community for Life - Providing forToday and Planning forTomonow MEMORANDUM DATE: Septembet 17, 2078 TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Don Johnson, Fire Chief SUBJ: lmpacts of Senior Housing Attachment: Data Table Outlining Calls and Housing Type A review of the current multifamily housing unit stock was completed in an attempt to project the impacts of future projects involving multi-story, multi-family housing units. Currently the city has approximately 977 units that lwill break into two main categories; Senior Housing and lndependent Multi Family. Although many of our apartment buildings are NOT specifically designated senior housing, a good portion of the units are being rented, or in Powers Ridge Condos owned, by seniors. When you consider the generational factors of the 'baby boomer' the city is beginning to deal with the impacts of a higher percentage of aging population. These facilities also draw additional alarm calls as independent living seniors are still cooking within these facilities and have a tendency to become forgetful of food in the oven or on the stove top creating fire alarm calls. The data sets reviewed included all of 2017 and Year to Date data from 2018 to include calls through August of 2018. Despite no changes to the priority medical dispatching procedures, the fire department's response to EMS calls continues to grow at a steady pace. To date, there has been 252 responses to EMS calls within the city. Fifty of those responses, or !9.8%, has been to senior housing facilities within the city. Summerwood represents 50% of those runs. ln comparison, only 22 calls or 8.7% of fire department EMS responses this year were to the other apa rtment units combined. Beehive Homes and Olive Eranch Estates have a higher percentage of calls to bed ratios based on the types of residents housed in those facilities. Currently the Mission Hills project is under construction and should parallel similar facilities such as Summerwood. Mission Hills will have 134 units of 'age in place' multi-story, multifamily units. We can expect to see similar response for service on EMS and Alarm calls for this site proportionate to what we see at our other sites. Reviewing the data shows a trend that the fire department could expect calls to Increase of 20%-30% of the total units available. ln this case, Mission Hills will add 134 units which could result in 24-40 additional calls per year. pH 952.22?.1100 . WWW.Ci.ChanhaSSen.mn.US . FX952.227 .1110 77OO I\4ARKET BOULEVARD. PO BOX 147 . CHANHASSEN . MINNESOTA 55317 ln project plans submitted for Avienda, the developer lists a total of 551 multi-story, multi-family units to include 192 independent housing units with 369 Senior Housing Units. Overlaying current trending information would support a projected 75-130 additional EMS runs based on current data. Those numbers could climb depending on the number of advanced care or dementia care beds are included in the 369. It is important to consider that the prioritized medical response protocols have NOT changed within the City. When duty crews are scheduled the department calls for EMS does increase slightly as there is NO prioritization in place in regards to response. Review of duty crew calls only shows a slight increase of EMs based on this response model. Chaska shows a much higher duty crew response to EMs calls within the same set of protocol diameters meaning that the Chaska citizens tend to dial 911 for more non-urgent medical needs than in Chanhassen. Over the past few years, Ridgeview Ambulance has also increased the coverage provided to Chanhassen to 20 hours per day. According to Ridgeview, the ambulance service area is seeing significant increases in service calls throughout their region. This also leads to increased calls for fire service response as fire/rescue is started when ambulances are out of the city. Between Chaska and Chanhassen, Ridgeview is constantly backfilling the eastern end of the county due to call volumes of the two cities. ln 2018, I am projecting over 850 calls for service for the Chanhassen Fire Department. With the increased calls, we are also experiencing an increase of EMS type calls as a main call type. As a paid on call fire department, the call volumes are starting to impact the recruitment/retentlon of firefighters as staff are dealing with the stressors of the increased demands. With justthe current planned construction we could see call volumes going over 1,000 in the next few years. Continuing to add this type of housing stock without adding to public safety infrastructure i.e. fire/ems services, will continue to adversely impact the Chanhassen Fire Department. Many of these new projects are getting further and further south from the main fire station. ln respect to response times, a planned review of fire department operations should occur to determine future needs for expansion of the fire service accounting for the developments being planned. ln the 2013 Springsted Fire Study recommendations included expanded duty crew coverage and/or the construction of a 3'd Fire Station in the south district to address call response times. These recommendations were made prior to the currently proposed developments. chan Apts 42G503 Chan Apt 425 chanhassen Mllage Gateway EMS Calls Other $ of Units 3s 20t7 Jan-Aut 2018 2017 Jan-Aug 2018 2017 Jan-Aug 2018 20L7 Jan-Au8 2018 2 3 0 I 44 27 Apartment and Senior Living Response Data 2017 Fire Dept EMS Responses 329 Current fofUnits 2017EMS 2018EMS Muhi Family 609 18 22 368 47 50 977 55 7 I 1 7 L20 Powers Ridge (1321,1331,r341) Proiected with Current Plannint lndependent Multi Family Total Senior Units Additional Senior Hst 503 Projected Additional EMs Runs 126 93s 87L 1806 2017 2018 36 44 Lake Susan Apts 20t7 Jan-Aug 2018 I 5 20L7 Jan-Aug 2018 2 6 20L7 Jan-Aut 2018 3 10 2017 Jan-Au8 2018 50 80 20t7 Jan-AuB 2018 375 2L5 Mission Hills Venue Avienda Attachment: 1 134 134 792 369 Centennial Hills Senior Olive Branch Summerwood of Chanhassen 161 48 76 t62 42 0 3 Senior CITY OT CHANIIASSXN Chanhasen is a Communityfor Life- ProvidingforToday and PlanningforTomorrow City Council Kate Aanenson, ACIP, Community Development Director September 24,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Discussion of Land Use The proposed land use amendments were discussed at the following meetings: July 18, 2017 - Planning Commission held a hearing to discuss the following chapters: Housing, Land Use, Sewer, Water and Parks and Trails. October 9,2017 - City Council held a hearing to approve distribution of the Comprehensive Plan for jurisdictional review. The land use map amendments were included as part of the packet. October 17,2017 - Planning Commission held a public hearing on the draft2040 Comprehensive Plan including discussion of the land use map amendments. July 17, 2018 - Planning Commission held a public hearing to recommend submittal of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review. The land use map amendments were included as part of the discussion and the Planning Commission approved the plan without the land use amendments. August 13,2018 - City Council held a work session on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Erhardt presented his land use amendment. September 2412018 - City Council holds a work session to review revisions to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan based on the August 13,2018 work session comments. Mark Halla represents the Halla Family. pH 952.227 .1100 . WWW. Ci. Cha nhaSSe n. m n. US . FX 952.227 .1110 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: 77OO MARKET BOULEVARD . PO BOX 1.47 . CHANHASSEN . MINNESOTA 55377 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kate Aanenson, ACIP, Community Development Director DATE: July 18,2077 SUBJ: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Discussion Please add the following pages to your 2040 Comprehensive Plan Binder, including the updated Comprehensive Plan Schedule. During the discussion under land use, there are two requests for land use changes. There will be someone representing both requests. The representatives will be allotted time to discuss their requests. Please visit www.ci. chanhassert.rnn.us/2040comppI an for all updates. MEMORANDUM TO: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager FROM: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director DATE: October 9,2017 SUBJ: Comprehensive Plan Distribution PROPOSED MOTION "The Chanhassen City authorizes the distribution of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan for jurisdictional review on October 20,2077." City Council approval requires a majority vote of City Council. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The city is required to update its Comprehensive Plan every ten years. As part of the update process, the city must submit the draft Comprehensive Plan to all adjacent governmental units for a review period of up to six months. Prior to distributing the Comprehensive Plan for jurisdictional review, staff is presenting the draft elements to City Council for an initial review. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan is an update of the existing 2030 Comprehensive Plan, rather than a complete rewrite of the Plan. A plan update is considered complete when it includes the elements required by statute and contains sufficient information for us to evaluate the following three primary criteria: . Conformance with metropolitan system plans. . Consistency with adopted policy plans. . Compatibility with plans of affected and adjacent jurisdictions. The Comprehensive Plan consists of the following elements: Housing, Implementation, Land Use, Natural Resources, Parks and Trails, Transportation, Sewer (Waste Water), Surface Water and Water Supply. Todd Gerhardt Comprehensive Plan Distribution October 9,2017 Page2 of7 City staff has attempted to garner resident comments of the plan through having a kiosk at the July 3, 2017 City Center celebration. On September 13 and 14, 2017 staff held open houses at the library and Recreation Center, respectively, to garner citizen input and provide information. The city has established a web page, www.ci.chanhassen.rnn.us/2040compplan, to promote dissemination of information regarding the draft2040 Comprehensive Plan. During the 6 month review period the city will continue to seek input. This would include community events such as Feb Festive. Throughout the summer, staff has presented draft material to the Planning Commission on the various chapters of the comprehensive plan. The Planning Commission will hold public hearings on the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan on October 17,2017 and, if needed, November 21,2017. Additional hearings will be held in the spring to address any jurisdictional comments or concerns. Final city adoption of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan will take place in April or May of 2018. 2O4O COMPREHENSIVE PLAI\ CHAPTERS Introduction The introduction provides a general overview and framework for the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. Land Use The land use plan identifies appropriate locations for all types of uses and provides for the orderly expansion of municipal services through the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) phasing plan. The land use plan provides the framework for the way the land is used. The plan deals with the following issues: o Development influences on the city. o The estimated consumption of land in five-year increments. . Comparison of the 2030 Land Use Plan and the 2040 Land Use Plan (a separate sheet reviews the list of proposed changes to the land use map). o Discussion of each of the land use designations. o There are three requested land use map amendments: a. City initiated residential low density to parks and open space. b. Halla (3 parcels) low density to high density residential. c. Erhart adding 3 additional acres to office and dual guiding the 13 acres to high density. Todd Gerhardt Comprehensive Plan Distribution October 9,2017 Page3 of 7 Housing The housing chapter addresses the city's goals for housing in the community. The following issues are discussed: o Inventory of existing housing including types and price. . Analysis of future housing demand. o Status of the city's progress toward the Livable Communities Act. o Discussion of the city's demographics. Forecast Year Population Households Employment 2010 22,952 8,352 10,905 2020 26.700 10.000 15.200 2030 3I.700 11.900 16,500 2040 37.'t 00 r 4.000 17.600 Natural Resources This chapter of the plan addresses natural communities including forestry and water resources. The following issues are addressed: o Creation of a management plan for lands that have been acquired by the city. o Create an inventory of the natural resources. o The commitment of the city to preserve the city's natural resources; woodlands, wetlands, lakes, rivers and streams. o Adoption of Green Step Cities initiative. Park and Recreation At the September ll,2017 City Council meeting, the Parks and Recreation System Plan was presented. The Park and Recreation chapter deals with the following issues: o Current park system. o Additional parks that will need to be acquired in still developing areas. o Additional communityball field space that will need to be acquired to meet demands of future growth. o Our pedestrian trail and sidewalk system is widely recognized as one of the most comprehensive in the State. o In addition to local parks, residents are afforded convenient access to county, state and federal outdoor recreation destinations. Todd Gerhardt Comprehensive Plan Distribution October 9,2017 Page 4 of7 Transportation The transportation element is based on the city's 2040 Land Use. Updates to these plans recognize changes in land use, development patterns and other planning processes including: the Minnesota Department of Transportation's "Transportation System Plan 2008 - 2030" (TSP), Carver County's Transportation Plan 2017 Update, and the Metropolitan Council's Transportation System Framework. o The Plan shows how the city will achieve its goal of creating an integrated multi-modal transportation system which permits safe, efficient and effective movement of people and goods while supporting the city's development plans, and complementing the county, metropolitan, and state transportation systems that are within its boundaries. o Addresses existing and projected deficiencies in the city's roadway system. o Establishes a functional roadway classification system for the roads within the community. o Evaluates system deficiencies. o Discusses existing and future improvements and funding mechanisms for the construction of transportation improvements. o Includes a table allocating forecasted population, household, and employment growth by TAZ for 2020. o Includes a map of existing and forecasted 2040 traffic volumes. o Identifies existing transit routes and services. o Incorporate transportation goals, objectives, and strategies outlined in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. Sewer (Waste Water) The Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive plan covers the future extensions of municipal service to future development areas. The plan deals with the following issues: o Organized and cost-effective plan to extend sewer service to development areas of the community. o Plan is based on anticipated land use, population growth and anticipated growth corridors. o Maintenance and upkeep of the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure. o Reduction efforts for Inflow and Infiltration. . Capital Improvements Plan. Todd Gerhardt Comprehensive Plan Distribution October 9,2017 Page 5 of7 Water The Water Comprehensive plan covers the existing and future extensions of municipal service to future development areas. The plan deals with the following issues: o Organized and cost-effective plan to extend water service to development areas of the community. o Plan is based on anticipated land use, population growth, anticipated growth corridors, and estimated future water demand projections for 2020,2030,2040. o Future needs for wells, storage and treatment facilities. o Maintenance and upkeep of the existing water infrastructure. o Capital Improvements Plan. o Identifies issues and actions to address them as part of the local comprehensive plan. Water conservation and reuse, protection of source and sub-regional collaboration. Surface Water The City of Chanhassen manages its lakes, streams, and wetlands through its Local Stormwater Management Plan (LWMP) and in partnership with four Watershed Management Organizations (WMO): the Carver County WMO, Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek, Minnehaha Creek, and the Lower Minnesota River Watershed Districts. The LWMP identifies areas of focus during the period 2018-2027, providing a guide to projects and programs to protect and improve these water resources. Parts of the city drain to either Lake Minnewashta or Christmas Lake and then to Lake Minnetonka. The rest of the city drains to the Minnesota River. There are 9 major lakes in Chanhassen,2 natural system lakes and hundreds of smaller ponds and wetlands including the Seminary Fen. Bluff Creek is the longest stream in the city, flowing just over 7 miles southeast to Rice Lake in the Minnesota River floodplain. The headwaters of Riley Creek is Lake Ann. From the lake's outlet Riley Creek flows southeast through Lake Susan, Rice Marsh Lake, and Riley Lake, then outlets that lake and flows to the Minnesota River. Assumption Creek, located in the Minnesota River Valley, is a DNR-designated trout stream. Where known, the LWMP includes information about the water quality in these lakes and streams, and the steps the city and WMOs are taking to manage them. Included in the LWMP is an update to the city's storm drainage models. These models break the drainage system down into ten subwatersheds, and model the network of storm sewers, channels, ponds, and wetlands that store and convey rainwater and snowmelt. These models can be used to ensure pipes and ponds are of sufficient size and to predict where flooding might occur during large rainstorrns. Todd Gerhardt Comprehensive Plan Distribution October 9,2017 Page 6 of 7 Discussion A number of water resources-related problems, issues, and requirements were identified in this planning process. These include: o The reissue of the State of Minnesota's NPDES General Stormwater Permit in 2013 requires local govemments such as Chanhassen to adopt and enforce standards and ordinances for development and redevelopment which limits stormwater runoff from sites over one acre in size. o New or expanded maintenance and administrative responsibilities are required in the NPDES permit to control runoff and protect and improve water quality from city owned or maintained land. o All4 WMO's are updating their 10 year Comprehensive Plans. The city is required to amend their LWMP to be consistent with each WMO. o In order to maintain and/or obtain primary responsibility for managing local water resources additional ordinance revisions are required. The alternative is to defer the authority to the local WMO. o Some of the lakes and streams in the city do not meet the state's water quality standards for recreation and aquatic life. o Stream gullies and escarpments are contributing excess sediment into Bluff Creek and the Minnesota River. To address these issues, the LWMP sets forth six goals as well as policies and action steps it proposes to take. The LWMP's Implementation Plan includes capital improvement projects, city- conducted as well as partnership projects with the WMOs and other partners; management programs such as education and outreach and water quality monitoring; operations and maintenance activities such as street sweeping, stormwater system inspections and repairs, road salt management and staff training; and ordinance revisions. While the LWMP is a ten-year plan, the Implementation Plan is reviewed annually, and new projects and programs may be added as more information is available and as opportunities arise. Goal l. Promote abstraction through infiltration, reuse and other methods where practicable to do so to provide flood protection, ground water recharge and improved water quality. Goal 2. Achieve water quality standards in lakes, streams, and wetlands consistent with their designated uses and established classifications. Goal 3. Protect and rehabilitate wetlands to maintain or improve their function and value. Goal 4. Prevent contamination of the aquifers and promote groundwater recharge to maintain base flows in streams and wetlands. Goal 5. Maintain primary responsibility for managing water resources at the local level where efficient to do so but continue coordination and cooperation with other agencies and organizations. Goal 6. Provide infbrmation and educational resources to improve knowledge and promote an active public role in management of water resources. Todd Gerhardt Comprehensive Plan Distribution October 9,2017 PageT of7 The Surface Water Management Plan is referenced in the Comprehensive Plan but will be a separate document tracking with the Comprehensive Plan. Because of the technical nature of the plan, and the review requirements for adopting it has been separated from body of the 2040 plan. Capital Improvements and Implementation This chapter details city code amendments and initiatives that the city must undertake to implement the comprehensive plan. Additionally, a copy of the city's Capital Improvement Plan required for facilities improvements has been included in the chapter. RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that City Council review the chapters and provide comments and direction for any changes to the chapters. Staff requests that City Council authorize the distribution of the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan for jurisdictional review after the initial public hearing held by the Planning Commission on October 17,2017. ATTACHMENTS Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan Submittal Guide Jurisdictional Review List Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan g:\shared data\planV040 comp plan\draft cc cover distribution.docx MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director DATE: October 17,2017 SUBJ: 2040 Comprehensive Plan BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held discussions this year to review the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan). The Planning Commission reviewed the following: Apil4,2017 Overview of Comprehensive Plan. April 18, 12017 Sewer, Transportation, and Water Jtilyl8,2017 Housing, Land Use, Sewer, Water and Parks & Open Space August 1,2017 Natural Resources August 15,2017 Water Resources October 3,2077 Surface Water, Goals & Policies, Implementation and CIP City Council approved the Plan for jurisdictional review on October 9,2017. The Plan is being distributed to other jurisdictions on October 20,2017 and the comment period is open until April 20,2018 for jurisdictional review. Following that date, the Planning Commission will review the Plan based on comments received during the review period, jurisdiction comments, the city's written responses to any comments and make a recommendation to City Council for adoption of the Plan. City Council can then approve the Plan contingent upon submitting the Plan to the Metropolitan Council for their review and finding the plan consistent with the Metropolitan System Plans. Only after the Metropolitan Council finds the plan consistent with the regional plan can the city's 2040 Comprehensive Plan go into effect. The2040 Comprehensive Plan consists of the following chapters: Chapter 1 : Introduction Chapter 2: Land Use Chapter 3: Housing Chapter 4: Natural Resources Chapter 5: Parks and Trails Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page2 of20 Chapter 6: Transportation Chapter 7: Sewer Chapter 8: Water Chapter 9: Surface Water Chapter 10: Capital lmprovements and Implementation The reason for this public hearing is to initiate the six month jurisdictional review process by allowing individuals to comment on the draft2040 Comprehensive Plan and permit the Planning Commission to review, ask questions, comment and provide direction on creating the final 2040 Comprehensive Plan document that will be adopted in 2018. DISCUSSION INTRODUCTION The introduction provides a general overview and framework for the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. This chapter addresses the city's vision as it moves forward. LAND USE The goal of the city is to create a mixture of land uses that provides a high quality of life and a reliable tax base. We have a very successful downtown and there is additional opportunity for retail with the potential development of a mixed use development at Highway 212 and Powers Boulevard as well as part of the mixed used development at Flying Cloud Drive and Highway 101, which was re-guided in 2015 as part of the CSAH 61 corridor study. Based on staff analysis, there is a sufficient diversity of residential land uses to accommodate housing growth in the community. Land Use 2030 Land Use Plan Acres Percent 2040 Land Use Plan Acres I Percenl Change 2030-2040 Acres Commercial Office/lndustrial Office Parks & Open Space Public/Semi-Public Residential Large Lot Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Mixed Use Undevelopable TOTAL 328 2.20/o 883 6.00/o 339 2.3% 1,410 9.6% 1,204 8.2Y0 971 6.6% 4,707 31 .901 400 2.7%, 218 1.5o/. 1 15 0.801 4,185 28.4% 14,760 328 2.2o/o 843 5.7% 277 1.9% 1,518 10.3% 1,204 8.2% 948 6A% 4,597 31.1% 499 3.4% 218 1.5%'143 1.Oo/o 4,185 28.4% 14,760 (23) (110) 99 28 : ioor (62) 108 Undevelopable Lakes, Floodplain, Rivers, Streams Road Right-of-Way Agriculture TOTAL 2,059 1,244 882 4,185 2,059 1,244 882 4,1 85 Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 3 of20 Map Amendments The city has received two requests for consideration of designated land use as a part of the update to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Staff is also proposing one land use amendment. 1. Request from Erhart Family Tim and Diane Erhart are requesting two issues. One is removal of an area from the Bluff Creek Overlay District, approximately 3.2 acres which is currently guided low density. The second request is for a dual guiding of the property for High Density Residential and Office. Following is analysis for your consideration. Amendment Request as prepared by Tim Erhart: After.further consideration in addition to our recent request to modify the Bluff Creek Overlay District Map as it relates to land east of Powers Blvd we additionally request a change to type of use permitted. We request that the area adjacent to Powers Blvd be dual guided. Curuently the area is guided ffice/industrial only. We believe that an alternative good use would be high density residential. The area is well served by the nearby TH #212 intersection, accessed via Powers Blvd. We understand that a bus station will be constructed in the immediate area as well. A residential use would allow residents use of the extensive trail system (planned) in the area as well as convenient access to Fox Woods Preserve. Moreover, residents would have access to Bandimere Park by a nature trail. We also believe that ffices would also allow use of the outdoor activity provided however it could be that high density residential may even provide more opportunities.for people to enjoy. History of the site: . Bluff Creek Overlay District created in 1998 (See attached Overlay District code) o 3 acres re-guided with the 200B Comprehensive Plan.from Low Density to Olfice o Land use amendment to allow 7 additional acres medical ffice.o A medical ffice plan was given site plan approval in 2009 but was never constructed. Erhart Acres gross Existing land use Requested land use Land Use - Office potential ss.ft. Land Use High Denisfii 8-16 units an acre ootential units 9.5 acres 9.5 +3.2: 12.7 166,000 ss. ft.l0l -203 units Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 4 of20 Remove Erhart Property from Bluff Creek Overlay District. Purpose of First Request: The Introductory sentence of the BCOD refers to the Bluff Creek Watershed Area. Starting with the second sentence and all references thereafter the term Bluff Creek corridor is employed. IT is clearfrom a reading of the BCOD ordinance that the intent is to apply development restrictions to " land areas abutting and in the vicinity of the (Bluff Creek) watercourse and its tributaries " (sec. 20-1552). To emphasize thefocus on proximity, the word corridor is usedfour times in the Purposes section of the ordinance. The Ordinance also purposed to "Foster the creation of a greenway connecting Lake Minnewashta Regional park and the Minnesota River Valley". In addition, other sentences are included that clearly indicated that this ordinance was intended to be applied to the corridor (and some cases a tributary) but not all lands in the Bluff Creek watershed or lands at a distance from Bluff Creek. The Blulf Creek watercourse lies nearly one quarter mile from the nearest point of our property, which demonstrates that our property is not "in the vicinity of Bluff Creek". Second, a four lane highway (Powers Blvd) separates our property from the Bluff Creek Corridor. Third, there are no tributaries of Bluff Creek on our property. Infact, there are not tributaries east of Powers Blvd. All water leaving the area east of Powers Blvd flows through pipes and road ditches, all man-made devices. Conclusion: Having our land included in the BCOD is inconsistent with the stated purpose and intent of BCOD and therefore is a misapplication of the ordinance. Therefore, we request that our land be removedfrom the BCOD. Second Request: If the city cannot agree to remove our landfrom the BCOD then: l. Adjust the Primary Zone line to a position where one can clearly distinguish why the line would be placed in such a location. In other words, there would be one or more features of the land that dffirentiate one side of the line from the other side. This is in contrast to the arbitrary location of the line as it is now and where no one can dffirentiate one side from the other. 2. Adjust the BCOD boundary lines such that only those areas with permanent natural features such as bhfrt, wetlands, and buffers between conflicting land uses are included within the primary and secondary zone. 3. Guide the entire I2.7 acres within the proposed BCOD limits illustrated on the maps to ffice, industrial or institutional use. 4. Guide the 1.8 acres directly south of New Street for public use and relocated storm pond. Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 5 of20 Purpose of Second Request: l. Amending the curuent plan and BCOD limits will allow the best use of the 12.7 acre area site (titled Fox Office Campus). Its location and direct access to the TH# 212/Powers Blvd interchange makes this area ideal.for ffice, industrial, or institutional use. 2. Convert the 3.2 acre area currently guided residential to ffice, industrial or institutional use as tltis area can only be accessed through the area already guidedfor such use. 3. Retain the existing natural area (NM pond and north/south wooded hiQ which serves as a buffer berween.future residential development to the east and the planned ffice park to the west. 4. Maintain the existing (private) trail connection between a.future trail head at New Street (see map) and Fox Woods Preserve. This trail runs through the center of the wooded buffer area. Once development occurs this trail will be designated.for public use. 5. Provide spacefor communityfacilities including a trail head and trail head parking at Powers Blvd directly south of New Street. 6. Allow space for the relocation of the existing storm pond to the south side of the New Street (mop). 7. Provide space for a planned lift station intended to serve the area south of Pioneer Trial 8. Provide parking and service access to the lift station's stationary equipment. Bluff Creek Overlay District Knowing where to apply the development restriction of the Bluff Creek Overlay District Ordinance (BCOD) to d property depends primarily on what is included in the Primary and Secondary Zone and what is noL The ordinance is then applied to all areas of property which lie within those zones. This specifically determines how the property within the BCOD can be used, what areas are "undevelopable" vs. "developable", what value the property is to the current owner and future users, and what tax generation capacity will result.for the city when developed. Which such significant impact, it is critical that the boundary be laid down with great care and thoughtfulness and witlt some sense of consistency based on other similar lands within the city. Most importantly, there must be scientific analysis applied (inferued but not described in the ordinance) to objectively determine the boundaries of the BCOD. At the time the BCOD ordinance was adopted, the Primary Zone boundary was established generally through the use of aerial photographs as no "on the ground" survey and/or data was available.for scientifically determining the limits of the zone. The intent (Section 20-1555 Boundary delineation) was that as properties come up.for development the landowner was to provide.field data to assist the city in making a determination of the line's.final location. Wile this process seeflN to be well intended, the ordinance, while describing the kind qf data requested, is basically silent on how to use the data to establish the actual location of the delineating line (the one exception is sec 20-1551 which deals with slopes specifically stating that area exceeding 25o% slope should be preserved). No additional guidance or process is given that would allow one or more individuals, by applying the ordinance's guidelines, to make Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 6 of20 similar and consistent determinations of the boundary line's location. It is our view that it should be inherent in any standard that two reasonably experienced people applying the same standard would come up with essentially the same conclusion. This is hardly the case with the BCOD. As a result, this lack of definition leaves it up to the sole discretion of the city staffas to where the BCOD is established. This arbitrary process could lead to many substantial disagreement, as I believe it has in the past. We submit that there must be some "standard" established, which when applied results in a consistent determination as to the location of the BCOD boundary lines. It is also our view that the primary criteria for determining this boundary should be permanent features such as topography and existing wetlands rather than plant cover, a.fence or the edge of afield. Nor should it be based on an existing road or previous use such as agriculture or a building site. These things are most often created by human activity and change over time. Moreover, employing tree coverage is problemotic as it also changes over time and penalizes the landowner who cultivates the property for agricultural production would be able to freely develop the property as there would be no tree cover due to his actions (and subsequently no BCOD). I believe this is unfair and contrary to the spirit of the ordinance. That said, where existing tree cover combine with a specific typographic.feature forms q buffer between two conflicting land uses, tree cover may be considered afactor in establishing the line's location. Trees simply by themselves are not a reason to include land in the Bluff Creek Overlay District. Typography and wetlands are much more permanent land features and better define what an appropriate use of the land is for generations to come. Use of topography and wetlands allow for more obvious and conclusive locations of such boundaries. Areas where level or gently slope abruptly change to a steep and prolonged slope are obvious points of separation and should be applied as logical boundary lines as city ordinances are already established such definitions in code. 00vl'ous ol delinc polnt Level or gentle sloping terruin +- S@gratcrttwa25l( Wetland boundaries are established easily through surveying, something that is already required of every development and should be used to establish boundary line locations as well. We submit that these two criteria (extensive slopes and wetlands) should be the dominant factors used to establish the boundary line locations Jbr this application of the BCOD. Neither the original location of the primary line (generated by aerial photos) nor the adjusted line (Fairview Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan PageT of20 Clinic project) demonstrate any topographic or wetland features that would distinguish one side .from the other. We therefore submit a proposed new location (described on the enclosed maps and below) which demonstrates and obvious locationfor the Primary Zone boundary. This location clearly exhibits a natural boundary condition where measureable difference exists between what is "inside" tlte primary zone and what is "outside". This proposed line is located where terrain changes abruptlyfrom a rolling terrain to a steep extended slope. tt ad Conclusion Regarding Request Number Two: 1. The area in question lies directly adjacent to the Interstate 212/Powers Blvd interchange which includes excellent access to the intersection. The area also exhibits great view .from the east bound trffic on TH 21. This makes the area ideally suitedfor ffice or industrial or institutional use. 2. It provides a beautiful settingfor users as they are surrounded on three sides by park land. 3. We believe the current BCOD boundary line shown on the current city mapping.for the area is unscientific and arbitrary and should be revised to comply with some reasonable standard or at least exhibit obviousness as to why it is located where it is. Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 8 of20 4. The 3.2 acre area now guided residential is adjacent to the 9.5 acres guided ffice/industrial. The only access to the 3.2 acre area is through the 9.5 acre area and in our view should be guidedfor ffice/industrial and/or institutional as well. Moreover, the area is rather noisy due to trffic from TH# 212 making it undesirable for residential use. 5. The 3.2 acres identified on the enclosed map represents an ideal locationfor a multi- story ffice building and its required parking area. It adjoins the 9.5 acre parcel guided ffice/industrial and offers a unique site line from eastbound TH 212 traffic. 6. Allows the construction of o/fice space similar in size to Fairview but movedfurther to the north and east. This provides for greater separation of uses between the large lot residential area to the south. This movement also eliminates the requirement for removal of part of the steep hill which would also then require tlte construction of a long I 2ft high retaining wall (included in the Fairview plan). Lastly it also eliminates the need to build a parking ramp as approved with the Fairview site as adequate spacefor surface parking is made available with the addition of the 3.2 acres. 7. The t.8 acres south of the new street would be used for the trail head leading to Fox Woods Preserve, trail head parking, the relocation of the existing storm pond and a planned sewer lift station. The proposed trail head parking can also serve as access to the lift station. 8. It appears that curuently the city intends to use this 3.2 acres as additional park land rather than use the landfor its best suited purpose. Even without the 3.2 acres in question, approximately 52.5%o of the 360 acres located in the vicinity is already designated as open space and is intended to be used by the public as park or wetland. Addition another 3.2 acres of highly developable and potentially tax generating property to an already expansive natural area will add little noticeable value. 9. The plan shown includes a trail connection to Fox Preserve at two points, startingfrom the trail head at New Street. This route is completely wooded and overlooks the.five acre Rim pond to the east and is screened by threes from the proposed ffice and parking area to the west. It also contains a smaller pond between the "Y" of the trail on the north end. The development of the 3.2 acres as ffice/industrial will have no negative impact on this trail connection and its amenities. Infact, such a development can easily include internal connections to the Fox Preserve and area trail system. Including the 3.2 acres as park does not in any way add to the already great experience that this trail provides. 10. Lastly the majority of the 3.2 acre area in question is currently usedfor agriculture as is a majority of the 9.7 acres already guided ffice/industrial. This allows easy transition .from the curuent use to o.fJice, industrial or institutional use. Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page9 of20 Designation: As can be seen, this area contributes to Bluff Creek. At one time, this area drained overland to Bluff Creek. With urban development, the drainage has been confined in certain areas to pipes and culverts. The drainage pattern on top of the bluff takes local drainage and directs it west towards Powers Boulevard. It also serves as the EOF for the large water body immediately east of the wooded area. Lastly, there is a mitigation area located northerly on the property. Staff response to the Bluff Creek l, I I Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 10 of20 Part of the discussion should be about the effects of urbanization on channel characteristics and flow hydraulics. As the area tributary to Bluff Creek is converted from prairie and woodland conditions to urbanized conditions, the following occurs: t. Base flow is decreased which leads to a failure to support aquatic vertebrates. 2.The flashiness of the flows increase as water is directed to the creek faster than under natural conditions. 3. The duration of the elevated flows is increased. Even with the installation of detention ponds, it still leads to a longer duration of peak flows even if the peak flow is decreased from an urbanized condition without ponds. 4. All of this leads to increased scouring, head cutting, escarpment formation and sediment loading and deposition. 5. This increased sediment load falls out of suspension downstream and leads to an embedded condition meaning there is a diminished fish habitat as the small riffles formed in the cobbled substrate disappear. This also leads to an increase in water temperature and a decrease in transitivity of light and reduced plant and plankton production. It is for this reason that we look at the entire watershed and not just that which is immediately adjacent to Bluff Creek. To facilitate the preservation of the natural resources on this property, the city proposed the dedication of a conservation easement over the primary zone north of the proposed access road and east of the office building. Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page I I of20 ,f.'d Approxirnate Are a o f C oruern'ation E a sernerrt i JEFa*l llrl 1,,'Etld , rrr Imn l"ErE( ,r'' gr ry,\/ I/l/i,l l'-/ r it.iTll'(':u'l City code specifies how the primary zone boundary is determined: Section 20-1555 O) Boundaries; maps. The primary and secondary zones include land that is generally defined in this ordinance and in the Bluff Creek Watershed Natural Resources Management Plan. Boundaries as established by officially adopted city maps shall be prima facie evidence of the location and type of watershed zone. The official maps shall be developed and maintained by the planning department. The applicant shall provide appropriate technical information, including but not limited to a topographical survey, flora and fauna survey and soil data deemed necessary for the city to determine the exact watershed zone boundary. The community development director shall make a determination to maintain the officially designated watershed zone boundary or if the boundaries need to be corrected on city plans and maps based upon the data that is supplied. Datafor watershed zone delineation shall be generated and provided by a qualified professional specializing in watershed management, environmental science or other related profession. The applicant may appeal the community development director's determination of the watershed zone boundary and type to the city council. (Emphasis added) Staff response to Erhart land use amendment request: l. Taking 3.2 acre out of the Bluff Creek overlay district is premature as with the recent Avienda request. City code specifies the requirements for revising the boundary. The applicant withdrew {b: ..frEtr- Planning Commission October 17,2077 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 12 of20 their request and will make a request as part of a site plan review. This option would be a variance request to the code. 2. Duel guidingg.g - 12.7 acres to High Density or Office would permits up to 112-203 units. Based on the housing study we have sufficient land guided for high density. 2. Request from Don Halla Family There are two sites that are being requested for consideration for a land use change Golf Course Acres gross Current Land Use Low Density 1.2-4 u/a Requested Land Use High Density 8-16 u/a Halla Family LP 45.04 85 - 150 units 360 - 720 units Mark Halla 12.21 Halla Family LP 12.06 Maryanne White 1.69 25.87 31 -103 units 201 - 414 units Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 13 of20 Andersen Development * representing the Don Halla Famlly DanieJJ. Andersen 3140 Montgomerie Ave Deephaven, MN 55391 512'812'3324 - Dfiua-(il4r,t'€e:ru cB.' c'F1 Dece.nber 19, 2016 RE: Halla Property Located at - l(XX)o, Great planed BLVD (Hl6hway I01)and 4g5 pioneer Trail Future comprehensive plan amendment for both locations. This comp plan wlll be dercribed as EAST AilD WEST. The reason for this description ls r*e belierre the use in both locations should be a like kind application. ln its current stste the nursery brings an industrlal look and feelwhereas the golf couGe flts in its location well, but is underutilized for a long.term delivery, It is our intention to bring continuity to these locrtions as it seems to be a main intersectlon that hat more potentialfor public use. ln looking througtr th€ city of Chanhessen $/e wanted to address tho need for a product delivery of a luxury apartment living, combined with public access. We feel that what is belng propored does not currently exist ln the greater Chanhassen area. With HiShway 101 and Pioneer Trall being a very busy intersection, a hlgh end single family usc has no merit, moreover, there are plenty of dlfferent slngle family repres€ntstionr prerent. Thls concept will show that oP€n space is important to the community and allows the open space to have a public use and opportunity for walking trails, tennis courts {possible a tennis club not shown on concepts|, basketball courts, and batting ca8es. fu one can see we have kept what we feel is the start of a wonderful cornfiunlty isset currently in the driving range on the west portion of this proposal. Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 14 of20 Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 15 of20 Staff response to the Halla request: Based on the housing study, we have sufficient land guided for high density residential uses to meet the city's housing goals and needs. 3. City Initiated amendment: City owned property (1.91 acres) guided Residential L,ow Density change to Parks & Open Space. The site is heavily wooded and has a 36 foot elevation drop from north to south. The city intends to keep this property as permanent open space. PIN 250020500 HOUSING The Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive plan analyzes the existing and projected housing needs of the city. The city has adopted the Metropolitan Council's Systems Statunent, which includes population, households and employment projects. The housing chapter addresses the city's goals for housing in the community. The following issues are discussed: o Inventory of existing housing including types and price.. Analysis of future housing dernand.o status of the city's progress toward the Livable communities Act.o Discussion of the city's demographics. C--r' -) *, .oo,,----. qffi M{ ,uxll 'trryJ"drlu.l,- '$rB t*F\rwE \rlm T!4r" i S. ",|,E€gH. *-;;; cnxtrr an 75 Ill-J { ,,Jil Planning Commission October 17,20ll 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 16 of20 Forecast Year Population Households Employment 2010 22852 8,352 10:905 2020 26,700 1o,U)0 '15,200 2030 31J00 ll,9o0 15,500 2040 3F,'100 14,000 17,600 NATURAL RESOURCES The natural resources section identifies the important environmental amenities and attributes in the city and their corresponding issues. The main goals encompass identifying and preserving naturairesources, and increasing overall tree cover and maintaining the urban forest. Proper management of public natural resources is the overarching issue and critical to the success of Chanhassen retaining it's natural resources identity. This chapter of the plan addresses natural communities including forestry and water resources. The following issues are addressed: o Creation of a management plan for lands that have been acquired by the city. o Create an inventory of the natural resources. o The commitment of the city to preserve the city's natural resources; woodlands, wetlands, lakes, rivers and streams. o Consider adoption of GreenStep Cities initiative. PARK & RECREATION At the September ll,2017 City Council meeting, the Parks and Recreation System Plan was presented. The Park and Recreation chapter deals with the following issues: o Current park system. o Additional parks that will need to be acquired in still developing areas. o Additional community ball field space that will need to be acquired to meet demands of future growth. o Our pedestrian trail and sidewalk comprehensive in the State. system is widely recognized as one of the most o In addition to local parks, residents are afforded convenient access to county, federal outdoor recreation destinations state and The park and Recreation chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan provides an overview and an analysis of the city's existing system. It identifies objectives and policies that will guide park and recreation decision making ttrough the year 2040 as well as identifying key initiatives that will be completed to enhance the current park and trail systems. Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 17 of20 In our community, we have numerous non-city recreational facilities that play an integral role in fulfilling residents' recreational needs. Minnewashta Regional Park, the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, the Minnesota Valley Wildlife Refuge, Raguet Wildlife Management Area, golf courses and Camp Tanadoona are all important recreation destinations. Two regional trails owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority and managed primarily by Three Rivers Park District can be found in both the southem and northern tiers of the city. In addition, regional trails are located along State Highway l0l and State Highway 5. TRANSPORTATION The transportation chapter is based on the city's 2040 Land Use. Updates to these plans recognize changes in land use, development patterns and other planning processes including: the Minnesota Department of Transportation's "Transportation System Plan 2008 - 2030" (TSP), Carver County's Transportation Plan 2017 Update, and the Metropolitan Council's Transportation System Framework. o The Plan shows how the city will achieve its goal of creating an integrated multi-modal transportation system which permits safe, efficient and effective movement of people and goods while supporting the city's development plans, and complementing the county, metropolitan, and state transportation systems that are within its boundaries.o Addresses existing and projected system deficiencies in the city's roadway network.o Establishes a functional roadway classification system for the roads within the community. o Discusses existing and future improvements and funding mechanisms for the construction of transportation improvements.o Includes a table allocating forecasted population, household, and employment growth by TAZ for 2020,2030 and 2040. o Includes a map of existing and forecasted2}4} traffic volumes. o Identifies existing transit routes and services. o Incorporate transportation goals, objectives, and strategies outlined in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer plan presents the existing sanitary infrastructure and the general location and size of future sanitary sewer infrastructure under fully-developed conditions. The Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive plan covers the future extensions of municipal service to future development areas. The plan deals with the following issues: o Organized and cost-effective plan to extend sewer service to development areas of the community. o Plan is based on anticipated land use, population growth and anticipated growth corridors. Planning Commission October ll,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 18 of20 o Maintenance and upkeep of the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure. o Reduction efforts for Inflow and lnfiltration. o Capital lmprovements Plan. The city has determined that all of Chanhassen will be included in our 2020 MUSA area. A list of strategic infrastructure improvements and sequencing has been developed necessary to install the infrastructure. There is a significant city investment required to extend urban services and there is a need to expand the service area that may connect to the system in a timely manner. Additionally, there are failing septic systems that should be replaced with a centralized sewer system. A lift station on the Powers Boulevard south of Highway 212 and forcemain from this lift station along the Highway 212 corridor are identified as the key infrastructure improvement for all the land south of Highway 212. WATER The Comprehensive Water Plan identifies the existing trunk and lateral watermain and wells within the city. The general alignment and size of future trunk watermain and the general location of future well sites and future water towers is also shown. The Water Comprehensive plan covers the existing and future extensions of municipal service to future development areas. The plan deals with the following issues: o Organized and cost-effective plan to extend water service to development areas of the community. o Plan is based on anticipated land use, population growth, anticipated growth corridors, and estimated future water demand projections for 2020,2030,2040. o Future needs for wells, storage and treatment facilities. o Maintenance and upkeep of the existing water infrastructure. o Capital Improvements Plan. o Identifies issues and actions to address water conservation and reuse, protection ofsource and sub-regional collaboration as part of the local comprehensive plan. SURFACE WATER The Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) was prepared in conformance with Minnesota Statutes 1038.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410. This plan is intended to provide the City of Chanhassen with information and direction in the administration and implementation of water resource management activities within the city during the period 2018-2027. It serves as a guide to projects, provides for effective allocation of resources, and sets forth a funding plan for projects and programs over the next 5 to 10 years. The City of Chanhassen realizes the importance of water resource management. In August of 2006 the city adopted the Second Generation Surface Water Management Plan. The LWMP is currently in the process of being amended and updated and is anticipated to be sent out for Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page l9 of20 review to appropriate jurisdiction by January 2018. The LWMP must follow a separate and mandatory review process pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1038.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410. The city's Plan will adopt by reference the local 2018 - 2027 surface water management plan (LWMP) and will incorporate the 6 water resource goals as specified in the LWMP. Goal 1. Promote abstraction through infiltration, reuse and other methods where practicable to do so to provide flood protection, ground water recharge and improved water quality. Goal 2. Achieve water quality standards in lakes, streams, and wetlands consistent with their designated uses and established classifi cations. Goal3. Protect and rehabilitate wetlands to maintain or improve their function and value. Goal4. Prevent contamination of the aquifers and promote groundwater recharge to maintain base flows in streams and wetlands. Goal5. Maintain primary responsibility for managing water resources at the local level where efficient to do so but continue coordination and cooperation with other agencies and organizations. Goal6. Provide information and educational resources to improve knowledge and promote an active public role in management of water resources. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS /IMPLEMENTATION The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Implementation Chapter provides a systematic assessment of the timing and magnitude of improvements that will be required to implement the comprehensive plan. Staff has included portions of the 2017-2021CIP. However, detailed descriptions of the potential projects are not appropriate within the Comprehensive Plan since they are dealt with in the city's five-year CIP. The individual chapters describe the proposed improvements. The city annually prepares a five- year CIP, which goes into great detail about a specific project. That document has greater accuracy and more detail then is appropriate in a comprehensive plan. The chapter also list required amendments, code revisions and initiatives that the city will need to undertake to implement the Plan. Planning Commission October 17,2017 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page20 of20 RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the Planning Commission review the comprehensive plan, accept comments on the plan, provide comments and direction to finalize the2040 Comprehensive Plan and concur with the submittal of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for jurisdictional review. ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo from MN Department of Health regarding Wellhead Protection Plan 2. Draft2040 Comprehensive Plan g\plantr040 comp plan\pc memo l0-17-l7.doc MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FRoM: Kate Aanenson, AICp, community Development Director DATE: July 17,2018 SUBJ: 2040 Comprehensive plan BACKGROT]ND The Planning Commission held discussions last year to review the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan). The Planning commission reviewed the following: April4,2017 Overview of Comprehensive plan April 18,12017 Sewer, Transportation, and WaterJrtlyl8,2017 Housing, Land Use, sewer, water and parks & open Space August 1,2017 Natural Resources August 15,2017 Water Resources october 3,2017 Surface water, Goals & policies, Implementation and clp October 17,2017 Public Hearing on Comprehensive pian City Council approved the Plan for jurisdictional review on October g,2Ol7. The plan wasdishibuted to other jurisdictions on October 20,2Ol7 and the comment period ended April 20,2018 for jurisdictional review. On April 3,2018, the Planning Commission reviewed the Plan based on corlments received during the review period, jurisdiction comments, and the city's written responses to anycomments. Now, we are holding the public hearing to make a recornmendation to City Councilfor adoption of the Plan. City Council can then approve the Plan contingent upon submitting the plan to the MetropolitanCouncil for their review and finding the plan consistent with the Metropolitan Systan plans. only after the Metropolitan Council finds the plan consistent with the regional plan can the city,s2040 Comprehensive Plan go into effect. Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page2 of26 The 2040 comprehensive Plan consists of the following chapters: Chapter 1 : lntroduction Chapter 2: Land Use Chapter 3: Housing Chapter 4: Natural Resources Chapter 5: Parks and Trails Chapter 6 : TransPortation Chapter 7: Sewer Chapter 8: Water Chapter 9: Surface Water Cfrupto 10: Capital Improvements and Implernentation The reason for this public hearing is to recommend approval of the 2040 comprehensive Plan' DISCUSSION INTRODUCTION (ChaPter 1) The introduction provides a general overview and framework for the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan. t is Jt apt". uaar"..L, the city's vision as it moves forward' All the goals and policies for ttre iO+O Co-pi"ttensive Plan have been stated in this chapter' LAND USE (ChaPter 2) The goal of the city is to create a mixture of land uses that provides a high quality of life and a reliable tax base. we have a very successful downtown and there is additional opportunity for retail with the development of Aviendaat Highw ay 212-and Powers Boulevard as well as part of the mixed used development at Flying CtouObrivl and Highway l!1'.which was re-guided in 2015 as part of the csAH 61 corridor study. Based on.staff analysis' there is a sufficient diversity of residential land uses to accommodate housing growth in the community' In response to jurisdictlorrut co**ents, the city has re-guided some agricultural lands to Parks and Open Space. Also, baseJon new GIS analysi.;;pp'.'-ately 40 acres of land was added to the total area and five acreswere de-annexed to Shoiewood with Cathcart Park' Planning Commission July I 7,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page3 of26 Map Amendments The Planning Commission reviewed two land requests for land use changes at their April 17,2017 as part of the Comprehensive Plan public hiaring. The Commission asked staff to meetwith Mr. Erhart to review his request. On June 7,2017 the Community Development Director,City Forester, Park, and Recreation Director meet on the subject site with Mr. irhart.The2040 Comprehensive Plan calls this area long-term for tle potential development time line.Even with the proposed reconstruction of Hwy 101 between County Road 6l and pioneer Trailthere continues to be sufficient development capacity. Conclusion and Recommendation Staffs response to requests 1. Erhart requests: is removal of an areafrom the BluffCreek Overlay District, approximately 3'2 acres that is currently gaided low density. The second request isfor a dual guiding o1ihepropertyfor High Density Residential and Office. a. Taking 3.2 acte out of the overlay district is premature as with the recent Avienda request. The Riley Purgatory Watershed District supported the presavation Overlay District by making it a condition of approval for wetland impacts.b' The plan proposed by the Earhart's shows smaller building, li-itirrg the grading and preserving trees. Once the land use is changed, it would be up to G developer to as to how the site is used. It could be mass graded with significant tree loss and grading and retaining walls. 1,781_. 1,?11 Rivers, Stleams ---J__ --+- Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 4 of26 c. Duel guidin gg.g - 72.7 acresto High Density or office would permit up to 112-203 housing units. Based on the housing study we have sufficient land guided for high densitY. Staff is still not supporting changes to the land use or the Bluff Creek Overly District Boundary. 2. Halla a. Based on the housing study in the 2040 Land Use Plan the city has sufficient land guided for higlr densitY 1)Withthecompletionofthe6lCorridorStudythereisthepotentialtoaddanother 750 multifamily units between the mixed-use district and the high and medium densitY districts' 2) The current guiding of the Gorra property (medium and high density) has the Potential for 1000 units' b. There is the potential for 700 medium and high destiny units in the Avienda Developmentthatwilltakeplaceoverthenextfewyears. c.Basedonthesizeofthet*:"Oproperties,thelow-densitylanduseprovideszoning districts (puD or RLM) ttraiwouta allow for the creation of unique neighborhoods using varying lot sizes' d.The2040ComprehensivePlancallsthisarealong-termforthepotentialdevelopment time line. Even with the profosed reconstruction of Hwy 101 between County Road 61 and pioneer Trail there ctntinues to be sufficient development capacity' The city has received two requests for consideration of designated land use as a part of the update to the2040 Comprehensive Plan' Tim and Diane Erhart are requesting two issues. one is removal of an area from the Bluff creek overlay District, approximat ely 3.2u.ro *ti"t, is currently guided low density' The second request is for a dual guiding of the proplnv ror High Density Residential and ofEce' Following is analysis for your consideration' Letter from Mr. Erhart - amended request Afterfurther consideration in addition to our recent request to modify the Bluff Creek overlay District Map as it rerates to rand east of powers Brvd we additionariy request-a change to type of use permitted. we request that -the area.adjacent to Powers Blvd be dual guided' currently the area is guided op"niinarsffial onty. W;b"lliel,ve that an alternative good use would be high density residential. ih" or"o rs weil tr*ri iy the nearby TH #212 intersection' accessed via powers Blvd. We understand that a bus station will be constructed in the immediate area as well' A residential use wotuld auow residents use of the extensive trair system (planned) in the area as well as convenient access to Fox Woods Preierve' Moreover' residents would have access to Staff is still not supporting change to the land use' Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 5 of26 Bandimere Park by a nature trail. We also believe that ffices would also allow use of the outdoor activity provided however it could be that high density residential may even provide more opportunities for people to enjoy. History of the site: o Bluff Creek Overlay District created in 1998 (See attached Overlay District code)o 3 acres re-guided with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan from Low Density to Officeo Land use amendment to allow 7 additional acres medical office.o I medical office plan was given site plan approval in2009 but was never constructed. Original request from Mr. Erhart: Introduction Thanks for taking the time to discuss our request to reexamine and update the Bluff Creek Overlay District (BCOD) ordinance mapping as it applies to our property in south Chanhassen. The specific area of concem is the approximate 20 acres adjacenitoihe south east quadrant of the TH #212 andPowers Boulevard interchange. To assist with the discussion, we have prepared several maps one of which shows the general area bordered by Powers Blvd to the west, Lake Riley to the east, Lyman Blvd to the North andw 96th St. (extended) in the south. This area consists of approximatlty:OO acres. Two detailed maps are also enclosed which focus on 20+ acre areawhere the BCOD applies. First Request: Rernove Erhart Property from Bluff creek overlay District. Purpose of First Request: The lntroductory sentence of the BCOD refers to the BluffCreek Watershed Area. Starting with the second sentence and all references thereafter the term Bluff Creek corridor is ernployea. lf i, clear from a reading of the BCOD ordinance that the intent is to apply development restrictions to "land areas abutting and in the vicinity of the (Bluff Creek) watercou.r" und its tributaries,, (sec. 20-1552). To emphasize the focus on proximity, the word corridor is used four times in the Purposes section of the ordinance. The Ordinance also purposed to "Foster the creation of a greenway connecting Lake Minnewashta Regional park and the Minnesota River Valley',. In addition, other sentences are included that clearly indicated that this ordinance was intended to be applied to the corridor (and some cases a tributary) but not all lands in the BluffCreek watershed or lands at a distance from BluffCreek. The Bluff Creek watercourse lies nearly one quarter mile from the nearest point of our property, which demonstrates that our property is not "in the vicinity of Bluff Creeki. Second, a -foui tane highway (Powers Blvd) separates our property from the BiuffCreek Corridor. Third, there are no Erhardt Acres gross Existing land use Requested land use Land Use - Office potential so.ft. Land Use High Denisty 8-16 units an acre potential units 9.5 acres 9.5 +3.2:12.7 166,000 sq. ft.l0l -203 units Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page6 of 26 tributaries of Bluff creek on our property. In fact, there are not tributaries east of Powers Blvd. All water leaving the area east of Pow"rt glrd flows through pipes and road ditches' all man- made devices. Conclusion: Having our land included in the BCOD is inconsistent with the stated purpose and intent of BCOD and therefore is a misapplication of the ordinance. Therefore, we request that our land be removed from the BCOD. Second Request: If the city cannot agreeto remove our land from the BCOD then: l. Adjust the primary Zone line to a position where one can clearly distinguish why the line would be placed in such a location. In other words, there would be one or more features of the land that differentiate one side of the line from the other side. This is in contrast to the arbitrary location of the line as it is now and where no one can differentiate one side from the other. 2.AdjusttheBCODboundarylinessuchthatonlythoseareaswithpermanentnatural features such as bluffs, wetlands, and buffers between conflicting land uses are included within the primary and secondary zotre' 3. Guide the entire iz.1 u"r""within the proposed BCOD limits illustrated on the maps to office, industrial or institutional use' 4. Guide the 1.8 acres directly south of New Street for public use and relocated storm pond' Purpose of Second Request 1. Amending tf* "*""t plan and BCOD limits will allow the best use of the l2'7 acre area site (titled Fox office campus). Its location and direct access to the TH#zlzlPowers Blvd interchange makes this area ideal for office, industrial, or institutional use' 2. Convert the 3.2 acre areacurrently guided residential to office, industrial or institutional use as this area can only be accessed through the area already guided for such use' 3. Retain the existing natural area (RIM pond and north/south wooded hill) which seryes as a buffer between future residential development to the east and the planned office park to the west. 4. Maintain the existing (private) trail connection between a future trail head at New Street (see map) and Fox Woods Preserve. This trail runs through the center of the wooded buffer area. Once development occurs this trail will be designated for public use' 5. provide space for community facilities including a trail head and trail head parking at Powers Blvd directly south of New Street' 6. Allow space for the relocation of the existing storm pond to the south side of the New Street (maP). 7. provide space for a planned lift station intended to serve the area south of Pioneer Trial 8. Provide parking and service access to the lift station's stationary equipment' Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan PageT of26 Bluff Creek Overlay District Knowing where to apply the development restriction of the Bluff Creek Overlay District Ordinance (BCOD) to a property depends primarily on what is included in the primary and Secondary Zone and what is not. The ordinance is then applied to all areas of property which liewithin those zones. This specifically determines how the property within tne 3COD can be used, what areas are "undevelopable" vs. "developable", what value the property is to the current owner and future users, and what tax geleration capacity will result for the city when developed. Which such significant impact, it is critical that the boundary be laid down wiih great care and thoughtfulness and with some sense of consistency based on other similar tands wittrin the city. Most importantly, there must be scientific analysis applied (inferred but not described in the ordinance) to objectively determine the boundaries of the BCOD. At the time the BCOD ordinance was adopted, the Primary Zone boundary was established generally through the use of aerial photographs as no "on the ground" survey and/or data was available for scientifically determining the limits of the zone. The intent (Section 20-1555 Boundary delineation) was that as properties come up for development the landowner was to provide field data to assist the city in making a determination of the line's final location. While this process seems to be well intended, the ordinance, while describing the kind of data requested, is basically silent on how to use the data to establish the actual location of the delineating line (the one exception is sec 20-1551 which deals with slopes specifically stating that atea exceeding 25oh slope should be preserved). No additional guidance or process is given that would allow one or more individuals, by applying the ordinanci's guidelines, to make similar and consistent determinations of the boundary line's location. It is our view that it should be inherent in any standard that two reasonably experienced people applyng the same standard would come up with essentially the same conclusion. This is hardly thi case with the BCOD. As a result, this lack of definition leaves it up to the sole discretion of the city staff as to where the BCOD is established. This arbitrary process could lead to many substantial disagreanent, as I believe it has in the past. We submit that there must be some "standard" established, which when applied results in a consistent determination as to the location of the BCOD boundary lines. Itis also our view that the primary criteria for determining this boundary should be permanent features such as topography and existing wetlands rather than plant cover, a fence or the edge of a field. Nor should it be based on an existing road or previous use such as agricultur" oi u building site. These things are most often created by human activity and change over time. Moreover, ernploying tree coverage is problematic as it also changes over time and penalizes the landowner who cultivates the property for agricultural production would be able to freely develop the propefiy as there would be no tree cover due to his actions (and subsequentlyno BCOD). I believe this is unfair and contrary to the spirit of the ordinance. That said, where existing tree cover combine with a specific typographic feature forms a buffer between two conflicting land uses, tree cover may be considered u f*to, in establishing the line's location. Trees simply by themselves are not a reason to include land in the Bluff Creek Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 8 of26 overlay District. Typography and wetlands are much more pelmanent land features and better define what an appropriate use of the land is for generations to come' Use of topogaphy and wetlands allow for more ob,io"t and conclusive locations of such boundaries. Areas where level or gently slope abruptly change to a steep.and prolonged slope are obvious points "f ..p"r"tl"n and Jt orti be appliedas logical boundary lines as city ordinances are alrea-cly established such definitions in code' a- Sr4cercotGr$on2sf wetland boundaries are established easily through surveying, something that is already required of every development and should be usei to esta-blish boundary line locations as well' we submit that these two criteria (extensive slopes and wetlands) should b:9" dominant factors used to establish theboundary line locations forthis application of the BCOD' Neither the original rocation of the primary rine (generated by aeialphotos) nor the adjusted line (Fairview clinic project) demonstrate anyLpogriprric or weiland feitures that would distinguish one side from the other. we therefor. rr}6*iialroposed new location (described on the enclosed maps and below) which dernonstrates and obviousiocation for the primary Zone boundary' This location clearly "*rriuit, a natural boundary condition w-here measureable difference exists between what is..inside,, the primary zone and what is..outside,,. This proposed line is located where terrain changes abruptly from a rolling terrain to a steep extended sloPe. Planning Commission JuJy 17,2018 20 40 Comprehensive Plan Page9 of26 Conclusion Regarding Request Number Two 1. The area in question lies directly adjacent to the Interstate 2l}lPowers Blvd interchange which includes excellent access to the intersection. The area also exhibits great view from the east bound traffic on TH 21. This makes the area ideally suited for office or industrial or institutional use. 2. It provides a beautiful setting for users as they are surrounded on three sides by park land.3. We believe the current BCOD boundary line shown on the current city mapping for the area is unscientific and arbitrary and should be revised to comply with some reasonable standard or at least exhibit obviousness as to why it is located where it is.4. The3.2 acre areanow guided residential is adjacent to the 9.5 acres guided office/industrial. The only access to the 3.2 acre area is through the 9.5 acre area and in our view should be guided for office/industrial and/or institutional as well. Moreover, the area is rather noisy due to traffic from TH# 212 making it undesirable for residential use.5. The 3.2 acres identified on the enclosed map represents an ideal location for a multi-story office building and its required parking area. It adjoins the 9.5 acre parcel guided offrce/industrial and offers a unique site line from eastbound TH 212 traffic. 6. Allows the construction of office space similar in size to Fairview but moved further to the north and east. This provides for greater separation of uses between the large lot residential area to the south. This movement also eliminates the requirement for removal of part of the steep hill which would also then require the construction of a long 12ft high tII I I ItII a I I Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 10 of26 retaining wall (included in the Fairview plan). Lastly it also eliminates the need to build a parking.u-p u, approved with the Fairview site as adequate space for surface parking is made available with the addition of the 3'2 acres' 7 . The 1.8 acres south of the new street would be used for the trail head leading to Fox Woods Preserve, trail head parking, the relocation of the existing storm pond and a planned sewer lift station. The proposed trail head parking can also serve as access to the lift station. g. It appears that cunently the city intends to use this 3.2 acres as additional park land rather than use the land for its best suited purpose. Even without the 3.2 acres in question, approximat ely 52.5o/oof the 360 acres located in the vicinity is already designated as open space and is intended to be used by the public as park or wetland' Addition another 3.2 acresof highly developable and potentially tax generating property to an already expansive natural area will add little noticeable value. g. The plan shown includes a trail connection to Fox Preserve at two points, starting from the trail head at New Street. This route is completely wooded and overlooks the five acre Rimpondtotheeastandisscreenedbythreesfromtheproposedofficeandparkingarea to the west. It also contains a smaller pond between the.Y,, of the trail on the north end. The development of the 3.2 acresas office/industrial will have no negative impact on this trail connection and its amenities. [n fact, such a development can easily include internal connections to the Fox preserve and area trail systern. Including the 3 -2 acres as park does not in any way add to the already great experience that this trail provides' 10. Lastly the majority of the 3.2 acreu."ui, question is currently used for agriculture as is a majority of the 9.i acres already guided office/industrial. This allows easy transition from thecurrentusetooffice,industrialorinstitutionaluse. Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 11 of26 PRmF AEFRovEq Sl?E pLAr{ C*Axx^tinx. Lt{ re E Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 12 of26 Staff response to the Bluff Creek Designation Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 13 of26 As can be seen, this area contributes to BluffCreek. At one time, this area drained overland toBluffCreek. With urban development, the drainage has been confined in certain areas to pipes and culverts. The drainage pattern on top of the blufftakes local drainage and directs it west towards powers Boulevard. It also serves as the EOF for the large water boAy immediately east of the wooded area. Lastly, there is a mitigation area located northerly on the property. Part of the discussion should be about the effects of urbanization on channel characteristics and flow hydraulics. As the area tributary to Bluffcreek is converted from prairie and woodland conditions to urbanized conditions, the following occurs: 1. Base flow is decreased which leads to a failure to support aquatic vertebrates. 2.Tlte flashiness of the flows increase as water is directed to the creek faster than under natural conditions. 3. The duration of the elevated flows is increased. Even with the installation of detention ponds,it still leads to a longer duration of peak flows even if the peak flow is decreased from an urbanized condition without ponds. 4. All of this leads to increased scouring, head cutting, escarpment formation and sediment loading and deposition. 5. This increased sediment load falls out of suspension downstream and leads to an embedded condition meaning there is a diminished fish habitat as the small riffles formed in the cobbled substrate disappear. This also leads to an increase in water temperature and a decrease in transitivity of light and reduced plant and plankton production. It is for this reason that we look at the entire watershed and not just that which is immediately adjacent to BluffCreek. To facilitate the preservation of the natural resources on this property, the city proposed the dedication of a conservation easernent over the primaryonr ,rorth of tn" proposeO access road and east of the office building. Ff...-:-- Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 14 of26 ,D .3r J-ffim&..rr =F GREEK Ovenlrv DlEilllgr- Exl'llElr Uthstupod ERHARITPROPERTY Cffisr,LN Planning Commission July 1 7,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 15 of26 Chanhassen 2O3O Land use Plan g$ crr-Elp *rrct @ orcnusrmr 1pmgJ mnrrunatror e5k!thrrDkt gJ ntwnr"rmmn olcrrry t 2..{.r, Olt@a-E!f,a) fl nrurrnrormw 0aacr*t-rcrt i,g! mrnnr I masetrncr I na.rcsanrnn.e Cj rlrrcnarnrxvffimn { eorennrtsrancoracEclr ,'f \'.'. Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 16 of 26 Staffs response to request: 1. Taking 3.2 acreout of the overlay district is premature as with the recent Avienda request' The applicant withdrew their request and will make a request as of a site plan review 2. Duel guidin gg.9 - 12.7 actesto High Density or office would permits up to 112'203 units' Based on the housing study we have sufficient land guided for high density' I-AND USE TABLE IN $}'EAR STAGES Request from Halla: There are two sites that are being requested for consideration for a land use change Outside Ulton Service Arcr Revised 6-29-1 8 Requested Land Use High Density 8-16 u/a Current Land Use Low Density 1.2-4ula Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 17 of26 Andencn D€wlopn€m - r€prescndrf, tta Don ltslr Famlh DaniclJ. Andancn 3340 Mongomcrte Avr tlceplrawn, Mll s533t 612{1U.3324 - S0brcl-6Alriec'rr\' F.l' G' r.1 December19,20t6 fit: tlella Propcrty tocated at - 100Q. 6raet Flild EtrrD 0{thnry lolf eld 495 pbneer Trd! Futur€ compnEherrsha phn rmcndmcm hrr bah bcadons.Ihisorrp plsr wlll bedcccrfted r EAsrAtD wE T' The reeson for rlrE dcrcriptkxr ls re bellern the rrc hr b*lr locetlorr drould bc e kkind applicatlon. ln its current stalE the rurr*ry brinF tn hdurEbl loot end ftcl trilreruas the golf eune ftts h lElocatbn uuell, but is un&nrtffi fore long.tcnn deFrery. It hourifiEfltlon to MrBsnthrltvtothcsc ]ocrtidrsrs lt scemsto b:a nrdn lntc*ec.tbnthathar mor€ poGntisl for public ure. ln looftltg throu$ lhe dB of cherfirrsen um urarrted to r*lress tlrr need for e product delluery of rluxury apartment lMng, corntined wfth puHic aqc. we ftel thtt t'h* ll helng proposad docs nm curr:rdy Gxlst ln the greater chanhgcsen area. yutth Hlghway 101 rnd Ploneer Trall belng a uEry busy iniErsectlon, a hlgh end sir4le family use has no m€rlt,moreover, there arE phntyof dlfferent slrEle fanrily reprtsentstioB pr€sefit. Thlr concept will shorv that op€n sprGe is kBortilt io thc communlty and alloyrs the open space tohare a publlc use and opportunity for watlftB $rils, tetrnls courts trcsslble a tenrris club not ihol,vn onconceptsf, barketbatl courts, and batdr6 caaEs" Ag me can sGe we have kept what we feel is the start of a wonderful BomorunltY asEt currently in ilre *iring raqe on the west Fortion of this proposal. Halla Familv LP 45.04 85 - 150 units 360 - 720 units Mark Halla 12.21 Halla Family LP 12.06 Maryanne White 1.69 25.87 31 -103 units 207 - 414 units Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 18 of26 Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page 19 of26 City of Chanhassen 2030 Land Use Ptan g$ mrnrncnr.gl orrce(ll arrcenru*rrnr. @ rreo gJ nesoerrr,runcrror eSert}ntimUlooilr) 6J nrsoexnn r-owananv oLllh!(yr2-ad&!, frat{6Ely4 -Eurnco, gf nrsoerrnr"nerm;rr G.ldtrJltt.toel gl mraln.nt I mroamrscr I natrcscmnnrc C3 aurrcnerrmrnnrcornoor fr eorerm"ern*rcoraanElr i;(((( .J(( (.\((lil-\ ( (s),' \r t Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page20 of26 { ..,-\\.. --'/ ) qo-t cerc4: KEET /-\ \\*,-- xrilq--EEEffiE' ) t Y _Noril I ;aglu{} =2Il .g urrergarrf I?*ffi.Ygs., bn'ql'9Yt * -'.aL 1frr*,*Et"r+rrlt - lJru5 l[4*tqf LstM, \}lrTt TDus ? fl Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page2l of26 Stafts response to request: Based on the housing study we have sufficient land guided for high density 2015 Changes to the Land Use based on the 6l Corridor Study. CSAII 6l Corridor Chanq€s Based on Amended [:nd Uses 6l Corridor Land Use Existins (ac-)Chanse (ac.)Proposed (ac.)Percent Units Population Buildine Area Emolovees Asricultural 846.83 -22.31 824.52 65.60A 3ffice 1s8.62 -58. I r 00.4i 8.0o/o (645.919 1,615 )ffice-krdustrial 81.92 40.05 41 .81 3.301 @44-867\g4s Parks & Ooen Soace 41.82 10.71 52.53 4.201 Mixed Use 0.00 28.7',\28.'11 2.301 t7t 342 79.893 592 Residential Irqelnr 39.00 -23.3141 15.69 1.20/,-9 -26 Residential Low DensiW 20_38 0.001 20.38 l.6o/t 0 Residential Medium Densitv 0.00 89.75 89.75 7.lo/,458 -144 Residential Hish Densitv 67.30 14.95 82.25 6.501 127 254 Commercial 0.00 0 0 Public/Semi-Puhlic 0.0c 0 0 Total 1 ,255.86 0.3569 1,256.22 l00o/a 74',1 1.715 1,010,893)r.468) r ( ( Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan PageL2 of26 3. City Initiated amendment: city owned property (1.91 acres) guided Residential Low Density change to Parks & open Space. The site is heavily woodeiand has a 36 foot elevation drop from north to south' The city intends to keep this property as permanent open space. PID 250020500 In response to jurisdictional comments, city owned property as part of the Foxwoods Preserve' land in the Minnesotu vu1l"v wildlife it"t g" and Iloguet witotir" Area have been re-guided from Agricultural to Parks and Open Space use' HOUSING (ChaPter 3) The Housing chapter of the comprehensive Plan analyzes the existing and projected housing needs of the city. The city has adopted the Metropolitan council's Systems statement' which includes population, households and employment projects' The housing chapter addresses the city's goals for housing in the community' The following issues are discussed: o Inventory of existing housing including types and price' o Analysis of future housing demand' o Status of the city's progress toward the Livable communities Act' o Address city's "ffortr to meet the 806 affordable housing unit goal' o Discussion of the city's demographics' o In discussion with the Metropolitan Council, the city has negotiated higher ernployment numbers for the future. NATURAL RESOURCES (ChaPter 4) The natural resources section identifies the important environmental amenities and attributes in the city and their corresponding issues. The main goals encompass identifying and preserving natural resources, urrJiri"."u.iig overall tree coveiand maintaining the urban forest' Proper management of public natural resources is the overarching issue and critical to the success of Chanf,assen retiining it's nafural resources identity' Planning Commission July I 7,2078 20 40 Comprehensive Plan Page23 of26 This chapter of the plan addresses natural communities including forestry and water resources. The following issues are addressed: o Creation of a management plan for lands that have been acquired by the city.o Create an inventory of the nafural resources.o The commitment of the city to preserve the city's nafural resources; woodlands, wetlands, lakes, rivers and streams.o Consider adoption of GreenStep Cities initiative. PARI( & TRAILS (Chapter 5) At the Septernber ll,2017 City Council meeting, the Parks and Recreation Systern plan was presented. The Park and Recreation chapter deals with the following issues: o Current park system.o Additional parks that will need to be acquired in still developing areas.o Additional communityball field space that will need to be acquired to meet demands of future growth. o Our pedestrian trail and sidewalk system is widely recognized as one of the most comprehensive in the State.o In addition to local parks, residents are afforded convenient access to county, state and federal outdoor recreation destinations The Park and Recreation chapter of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan provides an overview and an analysis of the city's existing systern. It identifies objectives and policies that will guide park and recreation decision making through the year 2040 aswell as identiffing key initiatives that will be completed to enhance the current park and trail systems. In our community, we have numerous non-city recreational facilities that play an integral role infulfilling residents' recreational needs. Jvlinnewashta Regional Park, the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, the Minnesota Valley Wildlife Refuge, Raguet Wildlife Management Area, golf courses and Camp Tanadoona are all important recreation destinations. Two regional trails owned by the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority and managed priniarity by Three Rivers Park District can be found in both the southern and northern tiers of ihe city. Irraddition, regional trails are located along State Highway l0l and State Highway 5. TRANSPORTATION (Chapter 6) The transportation chapter is based on the city's 2040 LandUse. Updates to these plans recognize changes in land use, development patterns and other planning proCesses including: the Minnisota Department of Transportation's "Transportation Systern Plan 2008 - 2030,, (TSpi, Carver County's Transportation Plan 2017lJpdate, and the Metropolitan Council,s Transportation Systern Framework. Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page24 of26 o The plan shows how the city will achieve its goal of creating an integrated multi-modal transportation system which permits safe, efficient and effective movement of people and goods while supporting the city's development plans, and complementing the county, metropolitan, and state transportation systems that are within its boundaries' o Addresses existing and projected sysiem deficiencies in the city's roadway network' o Establishes a functional roadway classification system for the roads within the communitY. o Discusses existing and future improvements and funding mechanisms for the construction of transportation improvements' o Includes a table allocating forecasted population, household, and employment growth by T AZ for 2020,2030 and 2040' o Includes a map of existing and forecasted 2040 traffic volumes' o Identifies existing transit routes and services' o Incorporate transportation goals, objectives, and strategies outlined in the 2040 TransPortation PolicY Plan' SANITARY SEWER (ChaPter 7) The sanitary sewer plan presents the existing sanitary infrastructure and the general location and size of future sanitary ,r*", infrastructur. rird.t fuliy-developed conditions' The Sanitary Sewer comprehensive plan covers the future extensions of municipal service to future development ur"ur. The plan deals with the following issues: o organized and cost-effective plan to extend sewer service to development areas of the communitY. o Plan is based on anticipated land use, population growth and anticipated growth corridors. o Maintenance and upkeep of the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure' o Reduction efforts for Inflow and Infiltration' o Capital ImProvements Plan' The city has determined that all of chanhassen will be included in our 2020 MUSA area' A list of strategic infrastructure improvem"nts a"d sequencing has been deveroped necessary to install the infrastructure. There is a significant city investment required to extend urban services and there is a need to expand the seiice area that may connect to the system in a timely manner' Additionally, there are failing septic systems thaishould be replaced with a centralized sewer system. A lift station on the Pow"., Boulevard south of Highway 212 andforcemain from this lift station along the Highwa y zlz corridor are identified as the key infrastructure improvanent for all the land south of Highway 212' Planning Commission luly 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page25 of26 'WATER (Chapter 8) The Comprehensive Water Plan identifies the existing trunk and lateral watermain and wellswithin the city. The general alignment and size of future trunk watermain and the general location of future well sites and future water towers is also shown. The Water Comprehensive plan covers the existing and future extensions of municipal service to fufure development areas. The plan deals with the following issues: o Organized and cost-effective plan to extend water service to development areas of the community.o Plan is based on anticipated land use, population growth, anticipated growth corridors, and estimated future water dernand projections for 2020,2030,2040.o Future needs for wells, storage and treatment facilities.o Maintenance and upkeep of the existing water infrastrucfure.. Capital lmprovements Plan.o Identifies issues and actions to address water conservation and reuse, protection ofsource and sub-regional collaboration as part of the local comprehensive plan. SURFACE WATER (Chapter 9) The Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) was prepared in conforrnance with Minnesota Statutes 1038.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410. This plan is intended to provide the City of Chanhassen with information and direction in the administration and implernentation of water resource management activities within the city during the period 2018-2027. It serves as a guide to projects, provides for effective allocation of resources, and sets forth a funding plan for projects and programs over the next 5 to l0 years. The City of Chanhassen recognizes the importance of water resource management. In August of 2006 the city adopted the Second Generation Surface Water Management p-lan. The LWMp is currently in the process of being amended and updated and is anticipated to be sent out for review to appropriate jurisdiction by January 2018. The LWMP -ust follo* a separate and mandatory review process pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 103P..235 and Minnesota Rules g410. The city's LWMP has been reviewed by all the watershed districts. Their comments were received by May 3d. The final plan is based on their comments. The city will adopt the local 2018 - 2027 surtace water management plan (LWMP) and will incorporate the six water resource goals as specified in the LWMP. Goal 1. Promoteabstraction through infiltration, reuse and other methods where practicable to do so to provide flood protection, ground water recharge and improved water quality. Goal2, Achieve water quality standards in lakes, streams, and wetlands consistent with their designated uses and established classifications. Planning Commission July 17,2018 2040 Comprehensive Plan Page26 of26 Goal3. protect and rehabilitate wetlands to maintain or improve their function and value' Goal4. prevent contamination of the aquifers and promote groundwater recharge to maintain base flows in streams and wetlands' Goal 5. Maintain primary responsibility for managing water resources at the local level and continue coordination and cooperation with other agencies and organizations' Goal6. Provide information and educational resources to improve knowledge and promote an active public role in management of water resources' CAPITALIMPROVEMENTS/IMPLEMENTATIoN(Chapterl0) The capital lmprovement Program (cIP) Implementation chapter provides a systematic assessment of the ti*irg *a iugritoa" of i-p.or"m"rrts that will be required to implernent the comprehensive plan. Staffhas prepared a2ol-s - 2027 CIP. However, detailed descriptions of the potential projects are not appropriate within the comprehensive Plan since they are dealt with in the city's five-Year CIP. The individual chapters describe the proposed imprwements. The city annually prepares a five- year CIP, which gJo i"a great detaii about a specific project' That document has greatet accuracyandmoredetailthenisappropriateinacomprehensiveplan. The chapter also rists required amendments, code revisions and initiatives that the city will need to undertake to implement the Plan' RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the Planning Commission review the comprehensive plan and recommend upf.orui of the City of Chanhass"t' 2040 Comprehensive Plan' \\cfs5kfs5\shared-data\plan9M0 comp plan\final documents\pc memo 7-17-18'doc CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, August 13,2018 SI]MMARY Statrwill summrize the frral drmges made to tte Plan and answer any qtrestions thd courcil members have. No action is required at this time. This item will be brought back to City Courcil for approvat ofthe 2040 Comprehensive Plan and submittal totreM€topolih Council. The local surface water management plan is tentatively scheduled for review and approval by the Mfurnehaha Creek Watershed Disnict on ThuMay , August23,20l8. The city may not adopt the Plan until dre watershed disgict approves it. llard copies ofthe 2M0 Comprehensive Plm ae being provided to eactr council member. BACKGROT]ND The Planning Commission held a prblic hearing on Juty l7,2ol8 and vobd 6 - 0 to recommend approval ofthe City ofChanhassen 2040 Comprehensive Plan and to submit to dre Mefopolitan C-ouncil for their review. This was the second public hearing held by the Phning C-ommissiur on the Compdrensive Plan. The first public hearing was on October 17 ,2017 . The Planning C-ommission minutes for Juty l7,2}l8 are in fre consent agenda for the August 13,2018 City Council packet. DISCUSSION The Comprehensive Plan provides a guide fu tre city's vision oftre communiry as it grows in ttrc coming yean. It establishes goals and policies to provide residen8, businesses, property owners, developers, and visitors a sense of $e commtmity's values and aspirations. There have been numerous opporflrnities fm individuals to provide input on tre Plan including presenttions at the Planning Commission, two public hearings, two open houses, two inform*ion stands d ciry evenb (2017 4th ofJuty and 2018 February Festival), newslerser articles, and links on the city's web site. Here is a link to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan: www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us2M0compplan. Subject 2040 Comprehensive Plan Section 5:30 P.M. WORK SESSION - FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM Item No: A.l. Prepared By Kde Aarenson, Community Developnurt Director, AICP File No: City of Chanhassen204} Comprehensive Plal nlara RECOMMENDATION Staffrequests that the city council review the 2040 comprehensive Plan and provide statrwith any comments or direction Prior to adoPtion. ATTACHMENTS: o Planning Commission SaffReport Dated July 17 '2018 el24/2018 Comprehensive Plan Contents .l Comprehensive Plan O* cI?Y COUNCIL AUGUST 13, 2018 CTTY OF CHAITHASSEN 2O4O COMPREHEIYSIVE PI,AN Chapters: * r. Introduction . z. Land Use . 3. Housing ' 4. Natural Resources . 5. Parks and Trails u 6. Transportation - 7. Sewer * 8. Water . 9. Surface Water . to. Capital Improvements and KtYt7 :( r€ 9l24l2OL8 Introduction o The introduction provides a general overview and framework for the city of chanhassen comprehensive Plan. This chapter addresses the city's vision as it -orr.t forward. A11 the goals and policies for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan have been stated in this chapter' 2020-2040 Land Use ComParison 186 211 73 490 7 80 1,426 298 130 9? (4O4" 2,589 1,787 12. 4,72'.1 32 2.1 6.( ?.i 9.( 8.1 6.i t1. 1. 324 883 339 1,410 1,7U 971 4,707 400 218 115 142 eql 114 1,N7 1,m4 870 3,29s 219 120 51 0.1 10.r 9.1 7. 27. 1. 1. Residentid [4edium Density Floodplain, RllB's, Stresmg o ?020 Land Ure Plan a^d Dd.-n zwe Land U36 Plan a^6. Pddn 2(x{' Land Ule Plan affi lPmn 2,05S 1,244 88i a{E 2.059 1,241 49: a74 2 e/24120L8 Land--n -v/.t Use Map q.,C-fr 3= !L--.:-a:: a:: l== iltQ IFl=- .ESF rIIll!- 3 el24l2OL8 Illustrative Housing Demand Breakdown Note: This breakdown is from a 2)L4study conducted by Maxfield Rese.arch Inc. Th;;t-,t;1,;rri.,g au-unJ has.subseque;.1l.b:"" Tllced to 5'ooo units; ;;;;;;lt. profrrtional breakdown is still informative' Natural Resources , Creation of a management plan for lands that have been acquired bY the citY' Create an inventory of the natural resources' The commitment of the city to preserve thq city'q ,rato.ut r.ao.rra..; woodlands, wetlands, lakes' rivers and streams. consider adoption of Greenstep cities initiative. 4 el24/2018 Transportation: Functional Classification 5 sl24l2oL8 II ttunsportation: System Deficiencies Eriii.a 9}lrDd.fr.i. a l.*rba. Na* i\,r#e* t\rffi Traffic AnalYsis Zones ,0I'8TrIdcr-5 c 5 el24/2018 Sewer 7 el24l2oL8 Sufsurface Sewage Treatment Systems 9/24/20L8 Capital Improvement and Implementation o , The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Implementation Chapter provides a systematic assessment of the timing and magnitude of improvements that will be required to implement the comprehensive plan. The chapter also lists required amendments, code revisions and initiatives that the city will need to undertake to implement the Plan. 9 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Approve EDA Meeting Minutes dated April 23, 2018 Section 7:00 P.M. ­ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Item No: B.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The Economic Development Authority approves the EDA minutes dated April 23, 2018.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES APRIL 23, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, George Bender, Todd Hoffman, Jill Sinclair, and Roger Knutson APPROVAL OF EDA MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2017. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the Minutes of the Economic Development Authority meeting dated September 11, 2017 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VENUE/ALDI PROPERTY: APPROVAL OF ASSENT TO REGISTRATION OF LAND. Todd Gerhardt presented the staff report on this item. Mayor Laufenburger asked the City Manager and the City Attorney for clarification of the action being taken by the Economic Development Authority. Councilwoman Ryan expressed her intention to vote in opposition to this motion as she has opposed this development from the beginning. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the Economic Development Authority approve the Assent to Registration of Land for the Venue/Aldi property. All voted in favor, except for Councilwoman Ryan and Councilman Campion who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Economic Development Authority meeting was adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 23, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, George Bender, Todd Hoffman, Jill Sinclair, and Roger Knutson Mayor Laufenburger: Please note that all 5 members of the Economic Development Authority are present this evening. We have two items on the agenda this evening. Is there any modification to the agenda members? We’ll proceed with the agenda as printed. APPROVAL OF EDA MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2017. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the Minutes of the Economic Development Authority meeting dated September 11, 2017 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VENUE/ALDI PROPERTY: APPROVAL OF ASSENT TO REGISTRATION OF LAND. Mayor Laufenburger: Is this your’s Mr. Gerhardt? Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, staff report please. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council members. Assent to register of land is basically the City has recorded certain documents against what is the Aldi’s/Venue development and between Bloomberg Companies and Chanhassen Frontier LLC are requesting that those documents be removed from the line of title against that property. Staff, the city attorney have reviewed all of the assent items and agree that the agreement have lived out their life and all the conditions have been met so staff is recommending approval of the assent to register of the land for the Venue/Aldi property. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you Mr. Gerhardt. Is there any questions from council of staff on the request to approve the Assent to Registration of Land for the Venue/Aldi property? Can you just clarify something for us? This is the property formerly known as the Frontier Building, is that correct? Chanhassen Economic Development Authority – April 23, 2018 2 Todd Gerhardt: That is correct Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: And the previous owner was the Bloomberg Estate or Bloomberg Companies, is that correct? Todd Gerhardt: That is correct. Mayor Laufenburger: So what we are doing is, and there were some restrictions placed on that title, is that correct? Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And have those restrictions in our view and the view of all the legal authorities, have those restrictions been fulfilled? Todd Gerhardt: Every one. Mayor Laufenburger: Every one of them, okay. So it’s United Properties, their interest is to essentially have title of this property and have it be a clean title, is that correct? Todd Gerhardt: That is correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So Mr. Knutson let me ask you this question as our legal counsel. Is this in the authority of the EDA to approve the Assent of this registration? Roger Knutson: Yes Mayor it is. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you. And we are, all we are doing is acting on the Assent of the title. We’re doing nothing to modify the development agreement with the property or the intended use of the property. This all relates to producing a clean title for United Properties, is that correct Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: That is correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Is there any discussion on this? Is there anybody that would like to make a motion on this? Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor I’ll make the motion. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: I would propose the Economic Development Authority/City Council approves the Assent to Registration of Land for the Venue/Aldi property. Chanhassen Economic Development Authority – April 23, 2018 3 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay and just to clarify. We were acting the Economic Development Authority. If this motion is seconded and passes then it will actually have further action by the City Council later this evening, is that correct Mr. Gerhardt and Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: That is correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so the motion should read just the Economic Development Authority. You okay with that Mr. McDonald? Councilman McDonald: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. We have a motion. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Councilmember Tjornhom. Is there any discussion on this motion? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. I just want to say that I’ll be voting no. I clearly understand that this is an administration detail that the City’s trying to clear up in order to move forward but this is a project that I have been opposed to from the beginning so I will not be able to support any elements associated with it. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, so your opposition is to what? Councilwoman Ryan: I will be voting against it. Mayor Laufenburger: And so your opposition is against the motion to Assent, is that correct? Councilwoman Ryan: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mr. Gerhard or Mr. Knutson, any further discussion? Anybody else? Could you just clarify, if this motion were to not pass does Bloomberg, or excuse me, does United Properties have any other course of action that they could take to get a clean title and remove those restrictions? Roger Knutson: Yes Mayor they do. Chanhassen Economic Development Authority – April 23, 2018 4 Mayor Laufenburger: And what is that? Roger Knutson: They would proceed with their court action and have a judge finally rule on this subject. Mayor Laufenburger: So a judge would then rule on the legality of removing the restrictions, is that correct? Roger Knutson: Yes that’s correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, and would there be any expense to the City to participate in that? Roger Knutson: To participate yes, there’d be some expense. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Any guess on how much that would be? Roger Knutson: I’m not sure what our defense would be. A few thousand dollars. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Any other comments or discussion on this motion? Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded that the Economic Development Authority approve the Assent to Registration of Land for the Venue/Aldi property. All voted in favor, except for Councilwoman Ryan and Councilman Campion who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 2. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Economic Development Authority meeting was adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Approve Release of Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement (Applebee's site­Downtown TIF District #1) Section 7:00 P.M. ­ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING Item No: B.2. Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Manager File No: HRA­016 PROPOSED MOTION “The Economic Development Authority Approves the Release of Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement (Applebee's site­TIF District #4).” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) entered into a contract for Private Redevelopment on June 3, 1996 with Apple American Limited Partnership. This redevelopment agreement was part of the establishment of TIF District #4, which was decertified in 2016. Since that time, the HRA transitioned into the Economic Development Authority (EDA), so the EDA is the governing body for this agreement. The property owners are attempting to sell the property in question and in doing so realized there is an existing Private Redevelopment Agreement that needs to be released in order for them to do so. Since the TIF District has been closed and the project has long since been completed, there is no reason to deny this request. BACKGROUND A Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement were recorded against the subject property (Lot 4, Block 1, Crossroads Plaza 3rd Addition). Execution of the the attached document will release these EDA documents and no longer affect the property. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the Release of Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectApprove Release of Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement (Applebee'ssite­Downtown TIF District #1)Section 7:00 P.M. ­ ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMEETING Item No: B.2.Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant CityManager File No: HRA­016PROPOSED MOTION“The Economic Development Authority Approves the Release of Contract for Private Development and AssessmentAgreement(Applebee's site­TIF District #4).”Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe Chanhassen Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) entered into a contract for Private Redevelopment onJune 3, 1996 with Apple American Limited Partnership. This redevelopment agreement was part of the establishmentof TIF District #4, which was decertified in 2016.Since that time, the HRA transitioned into the Economic Development Authority (EDA), so the EDA is the governingbody for this agreement. The property owners are attempting to sell the property in question and in doing so realizedthere is an existing Private Redevelopment Agreement that needs to be released in order for them to do so. Since theTIF District has been closed and the project has long since been completed, there is no reason to deny this request.BACKGROUNDA Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement were recorded against the subject property (Lot 4,Block 1, Crossroads Plaza 3rd Addition). Execution of the the attached document will release these EDA documentsand no longer affect the property.RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the Release of Contract for Private Development and Assessment Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Release 199146v1 RELEASE OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Chanhassen, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (the “HRA”), conveyed certain real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Property”) to Apple American Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (“Developer”), by Warranty Deed, dated June 3, 1996, recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No. 196184, and in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No. 92171 (the “Deed”). WHEREAS, the HRA and Developer, entered into that certain Contract for Private Redevelopment, dated June 3, 1996, recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No. 196185, and in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No. 92172 (the “Redevelopment Contract”) in connection with the redevelopment of the Property. WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Redevelopment Contract, the HRA and Developer also entered into that certain Assessment Agreement, dated June 3, 1996, recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in and for Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No. 196186, and in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Carver County, Minnesota, as Document No. 92173 (the “Assessment Agreement”). WHEREAS, the Developer and/or its successors-in-interest in ownership of the Property, have completed the Minimum Improvements described in the Redevelopment Contract and satisfied all of the other covenants and obligations set forth in the Deed, the Redevelopment Contract, and the Assessment Agreement in a manner deemed sufficient by the Chanhassen Economic Development Authority (“EDA”) f/k/a the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Chanhassen, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, and to permit the execution and recording of this Release. NOW, THEREFORE, the EDA hereby certifies that the “Minimum Improvements” (as defined in the Redevelopment Agreement), payment of the assessments required under the Assessment Agreement, and all other covenants and obligations of Developer and the successive 199146v1 owners of the Property set forth in the Deed, the Redevelopment Contract, and the Assessment Agreement have been performed and satisfied, and the EDA hereby releases the Property from any and all liability and obligations under the Deed, the Redevelopment Contract, and the Assessment Agreement. The County Recorder and Registrar of Titles in and for Carver County, Minnesota are hereby authorized to accept for recording and to record this instrument. The filing of this instrument shall be a conclusive determination of the satisfactory termination of the covenants and obligations of Developer and all successive owners of the Property referred to in the Deed, the Redevelopment Agreement and the Agreement. [Signatures Contained on Following Page] 199146v1 [Signature Page to Certificate of Completion and Satisfaction of Assessments] CHANHASSEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY:________________________________ Denny Laufenburger, Its Chair AND:_______________________________ Todd Gerhardt, Its Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 2018, by Denny Laufenburger and by Todd Gerhardt, respectively the Chair and Executive Director of the Chanhassen Economic Development Authority, on its behalf. (Stamp) (signature of notarial officer) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Siegel Brill, P.A. 100 Washington Ave S, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 199146v1 EXHBIT A Lot Four (4), Block One (1), Crossroads Plaza 3rd Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated September 10, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the minutes dated September 10, 2018.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: City Council Work Session Minutes dated September 10, 2018 City Council Summary Minutes dated September 10, 2018 City Council Verbatim Minutes dated September 10, 2018 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman and Greg Sticha PUBLIC PRESENT: Bob Ayotte 6213 Cascade Pass PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING DISCUSSION AND 8/20/18 MEETING FOLLOW UP. Greg Sticha introduced Jim Strommen with Kennedy and Graven who discussed how franchise fee agreements can work with CenterPoint Energy, Xcel Energy and Minnesota Valley. He noted that under state statute a public hearing is not required but would be suggested. Greg Sticha reviewed highlights of how the levy, franchise fees and assessments affect the revolving assessment fund, and the assumptions used before asking for guidance on continuation of the assessment practice and if the city council wants to keep the current levy of $384,000 in place. Mayor Laufenburger asked council members to addressed continuing with the 70 PCI, assessment practice moving forward, strategy on how long to have a franchise fee, how to fund the 60 percent. 1. Regarding the 70 PCI, council members were comfortable with staying at the 70 PCI number. Councilman Campion asked for clarification of what happens with having a 65 PCI but felt comfortable with staying with 70 PCI. 2. Assessment practice of keeping the 40 percent assessment moving forward. After hearing public comment council was comfortable with continuing with the 40 percent assessment practice. Councilwoman Tjornhom asked staff to continue to look at possibly changing the 40 percent number in the future. 3. Timing for funding the pavement management program in the 12 to 14 year range. Councilman McDonald stated he would fund the program as far out as needed. Councilwoman Ryan asked if franchise fees could be assessed solely on commercial properties. Jim Strommen stated that to his knowledge it has never happened and discussed how the energy companies look at commercial businesses. Councilman City Council Work Session – September 10, 2018 2 Campion asked about the possibility of ramping up street projects in the early years to take advantage of a smaller increase in material and wages. Council members discussed different ways to make adjustments in the future to the fund balance. After discussion it was the consensus to fund the program in the 12-14 year timeframe. 4. Clearly state how assessment franchise fees will be used for street projects. Jim Strommen explained that the current council cannot dictate what future councils will do and would suggest putting the intention of how franchise fees will be used. After discussion it was decided that it is this council’s intent to use the franchise fee for pavement management program but cannot bind future council’s actions. A resolution can be approved for the franchise fee intent but should not be put in the franchise agreement. 5. How to fund 60 percent city portion of assessments. Councilwoman Ryan expressed concern with the current use of $384,000 in the levy for the pavement management program and would be interested in reducing taxes by eliminating the $384,000 from the levy and just use franchise fees. Mayor Laufenburger explained the impact Councilwoman Ryan’s suggestion would have on commercial users so he would favor to continue with the current use of $384,000 in the levy. Councilman Campion discussed the impact of eliminating the $384,000 versus the 50/50 split between residential and commercial. Mayor Laufenburger discussed how property tax money is used by the City to provide services including street repairs. The work session was recessed at 6:55 p.m. The work session was reconvened at 8:45 p.m. CONTINUE DISCUSSION OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING DISCUSSION AND 8/20/18 MEETING FOLLOW UP. Councilman McDonald discussed the downside of Councilwoman Ryan’s suggestion of deleting the $384,000 from the general levy and the use of only franchise fees. Councilman Campion asked about possible uses of surplus money in the future. Mayor Laufenburger asked if it’s important to the council to keep the levy level versus changing the levy up and down each year. Councilman Campion stated he wished funding of this program had been addressed sooner. Councilwoman Tjornhom stated her belief that the council has been addressing this issue for some time but have addressed it with surplus money from the budget. Council agreed that it would have been better to do it sooner but it needs to be addressed now. Councilwoman Tjornhom favored keeping the levy as it is today, use of franchise fees and reexamine the issue in 3-4 years to see how it’s working. She also favored the 50/50 split. Councilman McDonald stated he would like to keep the levy where the council can have flexibility to change funding as needed in the future, use of franchise fees and the 50/50 split. Mayor Laufenburger asked about the impact franchise fees will have on city owned property, franchise fees collected from tax exempt properties, and the suggestion of increasing the levy amount and lower the franchise fee amount. He noted that the council is not voting on this item now but directing staff to put this City Council Work Session – September 10, 2018 3 item on a regular City Council agenda. Greg Sticha clarified that the franchise fees are a fixed rate, the use of the 50/50 split and direction on how staff should move forward with utility company discussions. After discussion council was undecided on how to fund the 60 percent but directed staff to prepare a motion on funding and discussion on whether or not to hold a public hearing when that motion is brought forward. Greg Sticha suggested asking Jim Strommen back at the next work session to clarify the process. 2019 BUDGET DISCUSSION FOLLOW UP. Greg Sticha reviewed the 3 scenarios being presented for the 2019 budget using revised numbers that have come in since the last discussion. He stated staff will be recommending Scenario 2. DISCUSS CHANHASSEN RETAIL CENTER PUD AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE. Kate Aanenson provided background information of the sign ordinance and action taken at the Planning Commission’s review of this item at their September 4, 2018 meeting. Mayor Laufenburger asked why this item was coming to a City Council work session and clarified options for council action. Councilman Campion stated he would not favor approving a sign. Councilwoman Ryan favored seeing additional signage on the monument sign. Councilwoman Tjornhom agreed that signage is not needed. Councilman McDonald agreed that signage is not needed. Mayor Laufenburger outlined the options City Council will have when this item comes before the City Council for review. Mayor Laufenburger adjourned the work session at 9:45 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES SEPTEMBER 10, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Liz Hoffman 6891 Utica Lane Kara Amorosi 6451 Oriole Avenue Carol & Bud Walker 8042 Autumn Ridge Cy & Madonna Kerber 1341 Lake Drive, #113B Michelle & Mike Rukany Randy, Lisa, Chas Mayer 3831 Meadow Lane Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to approve the agenda with the addition by Mayor Laufenburger under Council Presentations of adding discussion and possible action regarding recent correspondence from Mr. Donald Amorosi. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Coach Mike Ralston and Red Birds board member Ken Strand thanked the council and city staff for their support and recognition of the Chanhassen Red Birds. Mayor Laufenburger recounted the history of the Red Birds and read a proclamation declaring September 10, 2018 as Chanhassen Red Birds Day in Chanhassen before handing out proclamations to all members of the Class B Championship team. There was a short recess in the meeting to celebrate with cake. Mayor Laufenburger reconvened the meeting to continue with the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated August 20, 2018 City Council Summary – September 10, 2018 2 2. Approve City Council Minutes dated August 27, 2018 3. Approve Fireworks Display at St. Hubert Catholic Community, September 15, 2018 4. Approve Fireworks Display at Chanhassen High School, October 5, 2018 5. Approve Bill of Sale for Ladder 11 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. State Senator David Osmek presented an update on work that was done during the last legislative session and items proposed for the upcoming session. Councilmember Ryan asked about the potential for any legislation around hands free driving and opioids. Councilman McDonald asked if Senator Osmek sees anything happening this year regarding Met Council reform. Mayor Laufenburger asked Senator Osmek to keep Chanhassen in mind on having local control when putting restrictions on wireless companies and their application fees before thanking Senator Osmek for his support of the $9 million dollars of bonding for the completion of Highway 101. Donald Amorosi, 2368 Grays Landing Road in Wayzata, Minnesota asked that the City Council consider the following requests: 1. Participate if not chair a homicide review that the Minnesota Department of Health will soon commence designed to understand, innovate and focus prevention and intervention resources. 2. Meet with Health Partners applicable leadership to discuss the Make It Okay which is a community based program intended to break down stigma and encourage positive mental health. 3. Audit agreements with public safety and schools to determine whether funding is adequate and whether dollars are properly spent with respect to mental illness and report formally and publicly decisions and findings. 4. And his last request is to find a nice place in the city to plant a tree in his son’s memory. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Councilwoman Ryan explained her conversations with Donald Amorosi as being personal in nature and not as representation of the City Council. During those conversations they discussed the Carver County Crisis Center, mental health training with Carver County officers, the Minnesota Department of Health review as well as the Health Partner Make It Okay program. She clarified that in every conversation she had with Mr. Amorosi she always made it very clear that she did not want to discuss anything to do with the BCA investigation. On a separate note she congratulated the Chanhassen Parks and Rec System Plan team for being selected as a City Council Summary – September 10, 2018 3 recipient of the Excellence in Community Engagement Award for 2018. Mayor Laufenburger opened the item added to the agenda for discussion and possible action regarding recent correspondence from Mr. Amorosi. After comments and discussion by council members the following motion was made. Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council recommends that Mr. Knutson prepares a formal response to the email sent by Mr. Amorosi, direct staff to put on a work session agenda an item addressing mental health education, and to provide examples of what other cities are doing to address these issues. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. None. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Ryan seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 10, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilwoman Tjornhom, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Liz Hoffman 6891 Utica Lane Kara Amorosi 6451 Oriole Avenue Carol & Bud Walker 8042 Autumn Ridge Cy & Madonna Kerber 1341 Lake Drive, #113B Michelle & Mike Rukany Randy, Lisa, Chas Mayer 3831 Meadow Lane Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you ladies and gentlemen and welcome to this council meeting. To those of you that are present in the council chambers as well as those of you that are watching either on Mediacom cable channel or through our website. Through the agenda livestream. For the record let it be noted that the entire council is present tonight and the first order of business is the agenda. Council members I have a couple of modifications that I’d like to make to the agenda. First of all I would like to, if Senator Osmek is present have him speak immediately following the approval of the agenda and also I would like to add an item under council presentations at the end. Adding an agenda item called discussion and possible action regarding recent correspondence from Mr. Donald Amorosi. Is there any other modifications that council would like to make? May I have a motion to reflect those modifications on the agenda. Councilman McDonald: So moved. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you. Is there a second? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Second. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to approve the agenda with the addition by Mayor Laufenburger under Council Presentations of adding discussion and possible action regarding recent correspondence from Mr. Donald Amorosi. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 2 Mayor Laufenburger: That motion carries 5-0. We are moving with this agenda. Is the Senator Osmek with us this evening? I think he must be in route. We’ll accommodate him when he arrives. Okay. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: PROCLAMATION: CHANHASSEN RED BIRDS 2018 STATE AMATEUR BASEBALL CLASS B CHAMPIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: We have a public announcement to make this evening folks. Chanhassen is the proud home to the Chanhassen Red Birds and I would like at this time to invite Mr. Mike Ralston to the podium to talk a little bit about the recent escapades of our favorite baseball nine. Mr. Ralston. Mike Ralston: Is this on Denny? Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Nann is that on? It is on. Mike Ralston: Good. A couple things here. Mayor Laufenburger: Use your outside voice okay. Mike Ralston: Outside voice. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah there you go. Mike Ralston: Okay I’ll try. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Mike Ralston: So on behalf of the Red Birds Denny we appreciate you and your council recognizing our accomplishments this summer and the role we play within the community. I think that speaks for itself by the number of people here tonight so I’ve got 4 things I would like to appreciate. You know we’re not here today if Terre Kemble doesn’t have the strength and fortitude to rebirth if you would the long layoff that the Red Birds experienced of over 40 years, right? So in 2009 Terre and the board got together and brought amateur baseball back to the city of Chanhassen and our accomplishments this year only speak in small measures of how we can appreciate Terre and the board at the Red Birds. Had they not, there’s probably a lot of things standing in you guy’s way when you thought well let’s go give the Red Birds birth and you had fortitude to get through it and so we had a lot of fun this summer because of that so. The second thing I would like to say is behind any good team is a good set of coaches. Not me but I’ve had a partner in Mike Arnold. I moved to the local area in 2002 and he was my son’s first baseball coach in 2002 when the kids were 8 years old and so I’ll never forget one of the first persons I ever met in Chanhassen/Chaska was Mike and his conversations to me about how he was going Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 3 to run this 8 year old team which was to make sure we kept track diligently of the innings played by each player and that we were fair to each player so none of this is possible. You know we’ve had a 4 year journey together Mike and I. I think our last couple years we’re 68 and 17 give or take a couple so we’ve had a lot of wins but the things I always remember are our setbacks. You know we don’t always have smooth sailing even when you win a state tournament and Mike has always been a friend of mine. He looked at me one time this year and he said you know we both come from, we both don’t have brothers. We both don’t have sisters. We’re both only children. You can ask our wives. Mayor Laufenburger: That explains a lot Mike. Mike Ralston: Exactly…but he kind of gave me a hug and I gave him a hug back and to Mike Arnold who started this journey with me 4 years ago or 2002 you are my brother. Thank you a lot. Thanks for everything you’ve always done for me and my family. You know we did have some downturns you know in the last 4 years Denny a little bit. This year there was more pressure on the guys probably to juggle their schedules. We had guys getting married the last couple years. We had guys get engaged the last couple years. We had some lively conversations didn’t we about what we were going to do with our time and I can’t say as I was right or wrong. It doesn’t matter but we weren’t really hitting the ball very well you know. I think our State MVP and I won’t call anybody else other than his name’s going to be on the bat but you know you hit 480 in the state tournament. He was hitting about a buck 80 give or take a few in the second week and his dad told me, son it’s time that you start working on the 5 T spot so we weren’t doing really good. Mike and I put our heads together because really all we have to do is write a line up. Steer the team a little bit. Little leadership. Little motivation here or there but we came up with a couple things. We came up with, those of you that have seen the movie Major League. We came up with a hitting potion right? The hitting potion that none of us were going to drink out of and then we came up with the saying from Mookie Wilson. He was an all world player for the Mets back in the 70’s-80’s about whenever he was in a slump, hitting slump he just thought of dinosaurs and if he believed in dinosaurs, dinosaurs believed in him and it’d all work out and so through the playoffs and the thing this team really came impassioned by the spirit of dinosaurs and so if you were around the dugout you might have heard, do you believe? Yes we believe and that wasn’t a total religious statement other than it was directed toward, but I think it tells you in life Denny, I mean you can take things a little bit too serious. You can become stressed in life and Mike and I found a way to bring a little humor when we weren’t necessarily doing real well and so this team believes in dinosaurs. The last thing I would say Denny before I turn it over to everybody else is I can’t thank my wife enough. We had conversations about is this where we want to spend our time. We give a lot of our weekends don’t we? To Brenda and Mike we give a lot of weekends to the Chanhassen Red Birds and I’ve got to thank my wife. She gives up a lot of lake time and she gives a lot of vacation time to watch me do what I love to do so on behalf of the Red Birds, to the council and Denny we appreciate the recognition. You guys you’re not only a great team but you’re a great group of young men so thanks for giving Mike and I a great journey. That’s all I have Denny. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 4 Mayor Laufenburger: Thanks Mike. Is there anybody else from the Red Birds organization that would like to say a few words? Please. This is Top Chef Ken Strand. The person you don’t want to speak bad about because he’ll put foreign objects in your hamburger. Ken Strand: And hopefully you’ll come up with a new line soon. Mayor Laufenburger: It works. Ken Strand: It does. Well on behalf of the board of the Red Birds we want to thank the council for inviting us tonight. It’s quite a honor to be here and to be recognized. It was about 10 years ago now that Terre Kemble gave me a call and I hadn’t talked to Terre too much in, over that period of time prior to that she and I had been involved in scouts together so we spent a lot of time on camp outs and planning scout meetings and Terre called and said I’ve got something else we’re going to do. And it wasn’t would you like to. It was this is what we’re going to do. We’re going to start a baseball team and with the help of the first people who were on the board. Elise. Denny. Bud Walker. My wife Marcia. Terre. Nadia Jansen. We got it going. We got it rolling and it wasn’t easy at first but the thing that really made it easy for us was all the support we’ve gotten from the City and particularly from Todd Hoffman and the Park and Rec Department. They have been our number one fans all along. Todd. Whenever he gets a chance makes it down to the ballpark and will you know help with the concessions. Will trim the bushes. Will blow the trash out of the grandstand. Jerry Ruegemer helps us immensely with getting our schedules set up every year. Adam Beer gets out sign put out on the street for every home game so that we advertise as best we can so without their help it would be very difficult. We really appreciate that. We also want to recognize Cullen Bahn, thank you. Cullen Bahn from Chanhassen High School that is now the athletic director and he is, along with Todd and the Red Birds were working very hard to get that stadium even better than it already is. We have a lot of teams that want to come play us and it’s not because we’re a great team, and we are, and it’s not because we’re great guys, because they are, it’s because they want to come to our ballpark and we just want to make that the premiere ballpark in the state of Minnesota and we get a lot of help on that. So on behalf of the board, guys Terre and I and Marcia and the rest of talk quite a bit about not just how proud we are of you guys as ball players but as young men. We couldn’t be prouder. You guys are always very courteous. Friendly. And we really take notice of that. Mike and Mike, you’ve helped turn us into a state champion and that is something we never, never imagined. Well we imagined but we didn’t imagine it would come this soon. And you mentioned a quote from Major League was it? Well I’m going to quote my favorite baseball movie The Natural. And Roy Hobbs is laying in the maternity ward after an injury not sure if he’s going to play in the final game for the Knights and he looks up and he says, God I love baseball and I think we all feel the same way. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there anybody else that would like to say something at this time? No not right now Donald. This is Red Birds right now. I want to bring it back to the council. Council members, anybody would like to say anything you’re welcomed to do so and then I’ll have some concluding comments. Anybody want to go first? Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 5 Councilman McDonald: I’ll go. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Well you know it’s been a long time coming and I really appreciate what you guys did. It was, in watching the whole thing it was kind of a reverse of last year and I thought about that a lot as to how you arrived at where you arrived at and I enjoyed the trip. It was quite thrilling. The one thing that I really liked about this season was that I had an opportunity for my son and I, we went to quite a few of the ballgames. Almost all of them and we went to the championship games and the ones I couldn’t make he made and I think that’s part of what baseball is all about is you know it’s about family and it’s about an opportunity to get people together. I have done what I could do for you guys. I love advertising for everybody. I love supporting the team. I think it’s a great community asset. I think it’s something that all the young Little Leaguers should aspire to come out and watch you guys because of what is possible and for that I really appreciate and I tip my hat for being good role models that you guys are and actually at this point you’ve now earned yourself a place in Chanhassen I think history and lore. Just like the team from the, I believe it was the 50’s was the last time that we did something similar to this so you’ve got a unique spot in I think every citizen’s heart in this town so congratulations. Good job and thank you for quite a show. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Well while I don’t always make all the games I do always get an update from the voice of the Red Birds every other Monday night to hear how you’re doing and I remember being on the council when we had, as a city had the opportunity to collaborate with the high school to build the beautiful stadium that you’re in. It just seemed the timing was perfect. The high school was just kind of being completed and there was this opportunity to build your facility, your home that they can use too and I think that’s just a great, it’s a great way of showing that there can be partnerships with the schools. With the cities. With everyone in the town and so I just am so proud of you and I’m proud to call my home team the Red Birds and congratulations. Thank you. Councilwoman Ryan: Congratulations guys. Coaches. Amazing. Awesome job. I remember, similar to what Ken said, when Terre called and said let’s start this baseball team and Ken, Marcia, Terre, Bud and Nadia, we sat around in the rooms trying to pick out uniforms and colors and spent a lot of great time just talking about what this program was going to be and Terre bring out her Wet Vac to suck off water off the field and bringing the blower in the stands and all of it is because of not only their love for baseball but like you said coach, the love of the players and I think from the very beginning the young men that have chosen to play for the Red Birds represent more than just baseball. They’re representing their communities. Their families and they’re competitors and they want to win but they do it in a respectful manner so congratulations to you. I think it’s great for the team as a whole and incredible for the community so congratulations. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 6 Councilman Campion: Congratulations Red Birds. You are definitely an asset for our community. I definitely don’t make it to enough of your games but earlier this summer I was able to bring my family and Aiden was lucky enough to be able to throw out the first pitch with me which was very cool. He’ll remember that forever. As well as, even though Jerry upped the price per ball from a quarter to a dollar he decided to forego that dollar to be able to go and have it signed by you all and it sits on his shelf in his room so that was pretty special too so thank you for being here for the community. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you council members. This really is a historic milestone for this community. Community that has found just incredible joy from the Red Birds over the last 70 years. Just think about that, 70 years. I found the Chanhassen Villager Centennial Edition from June of 1996 and there was a page devoted to when Town Ball was King. It said when town ball was King Red Birds were tops and I’m going to take the liberty of reading a little bit of this article because this is a historic milestone for us. So John Mugford was a staff writer for the Villager back then. He writes this, in the late 1940’s and 50’s the Chanhassen Red Birds, a Class B amateur team played their Sunday games before packed stands on the old ballfield where St. Hubert’s Church and School is now located. Or on the fields of their rivals in Carver, Chaska, Waconia, Victoria, Mound and St. Bonifacius. How they fared provided the main topic of conversation in Joe’s or Pauly’s bars for the remainder of the week. Just think about that a little bit. Said Ron Roeser, I’m going to call him Roeser. Ron Roeser who was a teenage fan when the team was founded by Rube Bongard in 1947 and later became a player he said, and by the way Ron is in back. Ron would you wave there for a second. He’s with us tonight. Ron Roeser said I always say that when the Red Birds played their games out of town thieves could have walked into every house and business in town and not been caught by everyone. By anyone. Everyone was out of town watching the team. The author Mugford continues, Chanhassen only had 160 or so people in the city in the 1940’s and was always smaller than Chaska or some of the other towns but because we had a good baseball team we felt just as good as those other cities. Rube Bongard was a couple years out of the Navy when he started the Red Birds in 1947. Roeser believes that Bongard, who tended bar at the time and later opened a farm implement store, he just wanted to start a baseball team. He and a couple others from the town convinced, listen to this, the Carver County Board to level a hill and have trees removed at the site of the Little Woods on West 78th Street just a couple of weeks before the first game. Just imagine that. The County coming in and leveling this area. The County Board’s action caused quite a stir in other towns but Rube Bongard and his contingency had convinced the Board that the city deserved the action because the County had been neglecting Chanhassen for a long time. Things never change. But only once in a glory filled season that sent the town into baseball hysteria did the Red Birds win the Region 7B title and advanced to the State Tournament. That was 1949, a year remembered by almost everyone who recalls the Red Birds according to Roeser. 1949. 69 years ago. He continues, Roeser says many people considered the 1953 team to be the best Red Bird squad ever even though it failed to win the Region. Some of the players besides, by the way some of the players were back then, Stan Roeser, Boogie Wraser, Harry Pauly, Roger Pauly, Bob Meuwissen, and by the way here’s a couple of pictures that have some of those old players on them. Quite amazing and these are from Cy Kerber. Let’s see, let’s see some of the other Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 7 players, the new players included Ron. Ron became from a fan to a ballplayer. Bob Johnson. He was a high school kid from Edina who later turned professional. I think who did he play for Ron, do you know? Pittsburgh? I think he played in the Pittsburgh Pirates organization. Bob Kurvers. Listen to this one, Dave Chipperly. Mr. Chaska and also Dick Bren. So clearly the lore says that the Red Birds deserve to be on top and today they are on top. We owe some thanks to some key folks for the outcome of last Monday in Shakopee. First of all I do want to say thanks to the school district. Since the opening of the school and the baseball complex in ’09 and ’10 the City has been in cooperation with scheduling and the use of the field. The Red Birds have a great venue and it will only get better over time thanks to the Red Birds, the Legion, the high school and of course Cullen Bahn and the people at the school district. It was mentioned but the parks and rec department for supporting the rebirth of the Red Birds back in 2010. Some people had a vision. Terre had a vision that there would be a day like today and for us to see this come to fruition is quite remarkable. Terre, bless you for your energy. Your perseverance. Your persistence and the assumptive yes that you have is incredible. It’s not will you, it’s we will and by the way this is not only for the Red Birds. This is for everything that Terre touches. She and her board and the many community sponsors that I think about not only Jerry who’s done this every year but Kent Ludford at Merlin’s. Mediacom. Americana Community Bank. Cheer’s was an early sponsor. All of you. It makes a difference for the ballpark and for the team. There is great pride in what you as a board deliver to the fans. I also want to say a special shout to Eric Krauser. Eric since he came on with the Villager he has been an exceptional sports write. He’s been a great chronicler of the Red Birds and Unsi you’ve got to pass along that comment to him would you please. I do want to say a special thanks to the old timers. It’s their shoulders that we are standing on. Ron would you please stand up and hold your applause but Ron would you stand up, Roeser? I think Cy Kerber is here. Can somebody help Ron stand up. I invited Harry Bongard. I don’t know if he’s here. Okay. I want you to stay standing. Cy could you stand? Stay standing. Is Harry Bongard here? He was a bat boy. Is Bob Meuwissen, is he here? Bob was one of the early players. Mark Windschitl, the Mayor of Chaska was actually a bat boy. Howie Meuwissen is another player. Roger Pauly who’s brother in law to Dick Mingo. Somebody that I’m going to mention in a second. Anybody that I missed? I think did I hear correctly that Harry Pauly recently passed away, is that correct? Audience: Friday is the funeral. Mayor Laufenburger: Funeral is in Friday in Chan is that right? So to your, to you guys the shoulders on whom we all stand as a baseball team thank you. Let’s hear it for the old timers. I also want to mention 3 big fans of the Red Birds who are no longer with us. Lowell Mac McMillian is somebody who was a fierce follower of the Red Birds. He and his son Mike and daughter in law Rebecca were at almost every home game and he always had a strategy. He knew exactly what was the right thing to do. I’m surprised he didn’t make it onto the coaching team. Coaching squad. Dick Mingo, long time resident of Chanhassen. In fact Dick Mingo played with the Red Birds at one time. And then when the Red Birds folded in the 1960’s as the development occurred downtown, Dick tried to start up another team called the Chanhassen Mavericks. It did not last. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 8 Ron Roeser: Mayor, one real legend in baseball was Jesse Schwartz. He. Mayor Laufenburger: Please Ron. Can you step to the microphone? Ron Roeser: We got him in his waning years but he was just a delightful ballplayer and he coached everybody that, and he still could still play the game and he was I think in his middle 30’s but he was just outstanding. Outstanding guy. Mayor Laufenburger: Jesse Schwartz. Jesse Schwartz right? Ron Roeser: Jesse Schwartz. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright perfect. So Lowell McMillian was one. Dick Mingo and also Barney Riesgraf. These 3 gentlemen enjoyed baseball and especially enjoyed watching the Red Birds near the end of their lives and all of them are remembered and honored on the Red Birds Honor Roll of Fans and Family on display at the Storm Red Bird Stadium. Now I want to go back to the Centennial article. Here’s how the author concluded this. Roeser says even though he says playing for the Red Birds meant a lot back then and does to this day he recalls most fondly being a teenage fan of the teams of the 40’s. Listen to this guys. All of us kids in town would hang around at their practices. Help the players shag balls. Do whatever they wanted us to do Roeser said. We thought they were the greatest and we could not wait for the day when we could play. They were our heroes. No doubt about it. We love our heroes and to honor them on this day I have this proclamation that I would like to read. This is a proclamation recognizing the 2018 State Amateur Baseball Class B Champions. Whereas the Chanhassen Red Birds town baseball team became the Minnesota Amateur Baseball Class B state champions on Monday, September 3, 2018 during the playing of the 95th annual Minnesota Baseball Association Tournament, and Whereas, the Chanhassen Red Birds during the course of their season won first place at the Green Isle Hamburg Tournament and finished second in the Stearns County Classic, and Whereas, the team had a season record of 33 wins and only 8 loses, and Whereas, the team defeated the Miesville Mudhens in the final 2 games of the State Tournament by a scores of 6 to 1 and 7 to 4, and Whereas, the team was coached by Mike Ralston, Mike Arnold and scorekeeper Matt Schrad, and Whereas the players on the team are Brandon Arnold, Nick Smith, Derek Smith, Joe Jersak, Kyle Fischer, Ryan Burmeister, Matthew Smith, Logan Spitzack, Michael Jensen, Thomas Thompson, Riley Johnson, Ryan Diers, Gunnar McCarthy, John Eischens, Miles Nablo, Adrian Turner, Chris Choles, Dominic Reed, Zach Hoffman, Garrett Fischer, Justin Anderson, Justin Jeronimous, Jacob Goraczkowski, Shawn Riesgraf, and Connor Herd. Now Be It Resolved that the Honorable Mayor Denny Laufenburger and the members of the City Council of the City of Chanhassen on behalf of all citizens do hereby recognize the Chanhassen Red Birds for being the 2018 Minnesota Amateur Baseball Class B State Champions and for being the pride of Chanhassen and do hereby declare September 10, 2018, today Chanhassen Red Birds Day in Chanhassen, Minnesota. I have proclamations for each and every one of you. I’m going Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 9 to come and distribute those now. Now I know some of you may not be here but we’re going to try and do this. So Connor Herd. Mike Ralston: At school. Mayor Laufenburger: Augustana. Mike Ralston: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Jacob Goraczkowski. Mike Ralston: At school. Mayor Laufenburger: Chaska High School graduate crossed over to Chanhassen. Justin Jeronimous. JJ. Mike Ralston: He’s at school. Mayor Laufenburger: At school. Justin Anderson, number 27. Justin. Also the MVP of the State Tournament. Garrett Fischer, number 25. Zach Butch Hoffman, number 24. Zach were you on the All Tournament Team? Zach Hoffman: I was. Mayor Laufenburger: And Garrett. Garrett Fischer: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: That’s what I thought. You help me with that Mike. Dominic Reed. Mike Ralston: At school. Mayor Laufenburger: At school. Pitched a wonderful game against. Mike Ralston: Northfield and Moorhead. Mayor Laufenburger: Northfield and Moorhead both. Cholesy, Chris Choles. Mike Ralston: Working. Mayor Laufenburger: Busy. Adrian Turner, AC. Is he here? Mike Ralston: Working. Coaching. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 10 Mayor Laufenburger: Coaching. Miles Nablo. Your victory was over the first Miesville game right? Miles Nablo: Yep. Mayor Laufenburger: John Eischens. Is he here? Johnny. Gunnar McCarthy. Mike Ralston: He’s working. Mayor Laufenburger: Working, alright. And by the way, you know he will go down in lore because of his walk off, two outs bases loaded, 3-2 count, walk off home run that set us in motion last year in the very first game against Sauk Rapids Cyclones. Ryan Diers. Mike Ralston: He’s working. Mayor Laufenburger: He’s working. We’re taking your word for this Mike. Riley Johnson. Mike Ralston: School. Audience: He’s at school, Augustana. Mayor Laufenburger: Great addition this year. The speedster. Somehow he made a triple in New Prague. The people in the press box in New Prague said there’s no way he can make a triple. Either it’s a homerun or a double and he made it a triple. Thomas Thompson. Is he in school? Mike Ralston: School. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Michael Jensen. Mike Ralston: School. Mayor Laufenburger: School. Logan Spitzack. Mike Ralston: Teaching. Mayor Laufenburger: Teaching. Matthew Smith. Come on here Matthew. Burmey, Ryan Burmeister. Mike Ralston: Teaching. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 11 Mayor Laufenburger: Teaching. Kyle Fischer. Pitched an outstanding game to win 7 to 4 against Miesville. Finished the whole game right and that was more innings than you had pitched any time during the year, is that correct? Kyle Fischer: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Dug deep. Dug deep. Is Joe Jersak here tonight? Mike Ralston: School. Mayor Laufenburger: School. Derek Smith. Mike Ralston: School. Mayor Laufenburger: Nick Smith. Mike Ralston: School. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. I’ve got 2 guys that I want to bring up here together. Shawn Riesgraf and Brandon Arnold. Will you both come up here. I believe that these two guys are responsible for the rebirth of the rebirth of the Red Birds because Shawn and Brandon got together. We were in a little bit of a lull and Shawn was thinking what can we do to really energize. Brandon was playing for the Victoria Vics and the two of them got together and says let’s just make the Red Birds the best we can. They brought along, these two guys brought along two coaches so the coaches didn’t come first. It’s these two guys came first so Shawn Catfish and Brandon the Professor, let’s give them an extra round of applause. Is Matt here? Coaching? Mike Ralston: He’s at an event. Mayor Laufenburger: Matt Schrad, great scorekeeper. And he had one plate appearance this year too. M2, Mike Arnold. Come on up here Mike. Mike Ralston. Mike, he said it before but the one who really should get this is Chris. Chris you have endured far, far more than Mike has so I expect you can pass this right along to Chris. Mike Ralston: Well said. Mayor Laufenburger: And Terre you’ve got to come up here. Not going to ask you to say anything. You just have to stand up here. Heart and soul of the Chanhassen Red Birds. Terre, this proclamation belongs to you. Congratulations. Audience: Way to go Terre. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 12 Mayor Laufenburger: And with that we’re going to pause for a little bit of a recess and we’re going to have some cake so Red Birds congratulations. You’ve raised the bar. We’re expecting a repeat. There was a short recess in the meeting to celebrate with cake. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright ladies and gentlemen, we’re going to end the recess of the council meeting and bring it back to order. We’re going to continue with the agenda. Next item on our agenda is our consent agenda item. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated August 20, 2018 2. Approve City Council Minutes dated August 27, 2018 3. Approve Fireworks Display at St. Hubert Catholic Community, September 15, 2018 4. Approve Fireworks Display at Chanhassen High School, October 5, 2018 5. Approve Bill of Sale for Ladder 11 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: We have a scheduled visitor with us, joining us tonight is State Senator David Osmek from Senate District 33 which is, covers a portion of Chanhassen. Welcome Senator, nice to have you with us tonight. Senator David Osmek: Thank you Mr. Mayor. Good to see the council. I know how to clear a room. All you’ve got to do is say a politician and coming and they vanish. It’s a good thing I wasn’t in front of them because I think that was far more important probably than a lot of things that I do so good to be with you today. You did not get missed last year. I found out when we became the majority how much work becomes your problem as a person that’s in the majority at the Minnesota State Senate. Mayor Laufenburger: It means you could actually get things done right? Senator David Osmek: Well. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 13 Mayor Laufenburger: Kind of. Senator David Osmek: Maybe. Then you put together a 900 page Bill this year that gets vetoed that had a lot of good things in it, including and also a tax Bill that we did have the Excelsior Commons Provision in it for the local option sales tax for Excelsior to actually work on their park for them. They have a lot of rip rap issues that they need help with and we would have been able to provide them $5 million dollars worth of tax increment, well I’m sorry. Not tax increment financing but local option sales tax for them to work on that. I want to talk about that for just a second. The City Council of Excelsior passed that 5-0. They put it on a regular general ballot that you guys are normally on and it passed by 16 points. There’s a lot of people that say well, Senator Osmek you’re Mr. No Tax right? Well of course I am but I’m also representing you as your City Council at the State Capitol so that’s very important to me that I represent you, not necessarily my political whims or my political choices. It’s important that I represent your point of view so the legislative session ended with a veto thud. We had in that Bill we actually had some spending that I helped shepherd through on the renewable developments account that actually was going to help businesses that are impacted by a power down of a couple of different biomass facilities we have. One is out in Benson, Minnesota. I may have heard about them. They’re the turkey excrement burning facility which people don’t quite understand how bad that facility, how expensive that was to us the rate payers because you all are Xcel rate payers. For every dollar of turkey excrement that was burned, we were paying $11 worth of transport costs. That’s a problem so we did help, try to help those businesses. We’re going to be coming back for a second run at that. Other than that I’m more or less here to hear what you have to say. I come, I try to get to your legislative overviews before session starts. Don’t always make it but I certainly get the report on it. Anything you have on your mind happy to take back to the Capitol. We are starting to craft, it sounds strange. We’re already starting to craft Bills now for the legislative session so I will be working actually more or less next month on Bills that we need to get to and start on starting on January 1st. Well January 7th I think is when we come back so with that members of the council any questions? Concerns? Comments? Mayor Laufenburger: Council any questions or comments or anything you’d like to say? Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you Senator. I’m curious about the, how far or if there’s potential for any legislations around hands free driving. Senator David Osmek: Right now there’s not a lot of movement on that. However, and I haven’t been the biggest supporter of hands free driving. Of that particular Bill because it’s very difficult to enforce. My position has been let’s deal with distracted driving because that is between a cell phone, a radio, the kids in the back seat, that extra French fry underneath you that you dropped on the floor, there’s a lot of ways that people become distracted and Representative Frankie had a good distracted driving Bill. Right now you could actually only spend a few months in jail if you actually killed someone because you were improperly driving a vehicle and I think that that is woefully, woefully, and it isn’t about reforming someone that goes, had has Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 14 had this happen. It’s also a matter of you paying your debt to society because you have killed someone so I think we have to look at the laws on manslaughter, vehicular. I’m not sure if we have vehicular manslaughter but I think we have to start looking at that because I want to hold people accountable just not for distracted driving but more over for every problem and every issue that people have that are causing them to have these accidents. Councilwoman Ryan: And how is that, how do you enforce that any easier than with whether or not they’re on a cell phone or they’re getting a French fry. I mean how is, how do you differentiate enforcement? Senator David Osmek: You will have to, there’s proof, levels of proof you have to go to and I don’t serve on the judiciary committee so I’m not as well versed in it but there are levels of proof that you have to climb through in order to show that this person was distracted and it’s the same thing you would have with distracted driving by hands free. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Senator David Osmek: I’ve seen too many times, my daughter totaled my wife’s SUV about 4 years ago because she was messing with the radio so hands free is one component of a bigger issue. Out in McLeod County where I come from they actually had someone that was hit on the shoulder and the person I think got 8 months in jail. That’s not appropriate. Regardless of your intent, see the problem you climb through is intent and obviously the person didn’t intend on hitting them but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be held accountable. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. Senator David Osmek: I will be, that will be one of my priority items is getting through additional, getting through tougher distracted driving laws for all types of distracted driving. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay thank you. That’s one and then any legislation around opioids? And I know it came close last session but it didn’t pass. Senator David Osmek: Well I have a very deep concern about having what’s called Penny a Pill because the people who are paying for the Penny a Pill, the largest vast majority are people who are not abusing the system. So you’re asking people who are not abusing, and actually people who are really abusing opioids aren’t even getting prescriptions most of the time from doctors. They’re getting it off the street from different places and if you try and enforce that upon drug companies what are they going to do? And I work in the health care industry. All they’re going to do is raise their average wholesale price so there has to be, my opinion is if this is a problem and it’s a crisis then we should be dealing with it from our general fund budget, to help counties, more specifically help counties, especially Hennepin County in coming up with programs. Also the federal government is in the process of bringing in programs too and I was also very reticent about doing anything until we know what the feds are going to do. Of course the feds may never Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 15 do anything but that’s my opinion of the situation. I’m very hesitant on the Penny a Pill for those reasons. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay and it was broader than, I know the Penny a Pill didn’t pass last year but I was curious about if you see any legislation coming in in terms of you know treatment and just addressing obviously what is a national crisis. If we’re doing anything at the State level. Senator David Osmek: I do see us spending money on that in the next general, next year will be a general fund budget. I do see us spending on it. My preference would be to send it to counties for them to improve their programs because the money, the closest to the problem is probably the best served for the situation. I don’t know if we want to create a statewide problem because it may be a problem that counties already recognize. Councilwoman Ryan: Right, okay thank you Senator. Senator David Osmek: Sure. Mayor Laufenburger: Anybody else? Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Do you see anything happening this year with reform to Met Council? Senator David Osmek: One of my favorite topics as you know. My opinion of the Met Council is rather low because they’ve earned it. My hope is, and Mayor Laufenburger was a testifier at one point in time to a Bill to try and make them a little bit more accountable. I think it depends unfortunately it will depend upon who becomes Governor of the State of Minnesota. I think that we should be, even the democrats on the other side of the aisle recognize the fact that Met Council has lost it’s way from a representative standpoint and there have been a number of provisions including electing them. Direct election on a general election ballot which I would have some nervousness about because I think I’ve said this before, who’s your Water and Soil, you guys are probably the bad ones to ask this question. Who’s your Water and Soil Commission and what does he believe in? It’s very difficult to find out what a Met Council rep is going to do so my hope is that my common sense direction that Mayor Laufenburger was testifying on is the route to go but I think we have to have some changes and even the other side of the aisle recognizes that. Councilman McDonald: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: And Senator just so you know this council was on record in support of reform of governance at the Met Council. We passed that resolution I think it was sometime Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 16 during 2017 if I’m not mistaken. And I recently co-signed a letter from, a letter to Jason Lewis, Congressman in support of reform to the Met Council as well. I have a couple comments if I will and then a huge thank you too. First of all this council has also passed a resolution in support of local control. You know there are many things that can be done at a State level that impede our ability to make local decisions and obviously we support local control along with many cities that are part of the League of Minnesota Cities doing so. And one in particular is, I ask that you keep us in mind when you consider putting restrictions on wireless companies and their application fees and I know that you’ve voiced a view on that and I’m not asking you to voice that at this time but we think that we should be able to establish what is a reasonable application fee and not be impeded by the wireless companies so just keep that in mind. But now a big thanks. You were a big supporter of Chanhassen’s contingent at the Capitol when we were advocating for $9 million dollars of bonding for completion of 101 so on behalf of not only this council but the community and Mr. Oehme who loves to build roads. Thank you for your support of that $9 million dollar bonding Senator. And with that we appreciate you serving us and we hope to see you again very soon. Senator David Osmek: Well thank you for your time and I always love building roads. Just not roads for trains. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah I understand that. Senator David Osmek: Appreciate your time and I look forward to seeing you perhaps next year and try and become a little bit more even cyclical. It was, last year was a very difficult year with trying to put together a budget, being the Chair of a committee and having a full time job on top of it so I know where you guys come from and on your local control issue, I don’t think you’ll find anybody that believes more in local control than myself. Mayor Laufenburger: Good. Senator David Osmek: So thank you very much. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Senator. Thank you. Now if there is anyone else that would like to make a presentation during visitor presentation you may step forward at this time. Just state your name and address please. Donald Amorosi: It’s Donald Amorosi. It’s 2368 Grays Landing Road in Wayzata, Minnesota. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, nice to have you with us Mr. Amorosi. Donald Amorosi: Yeah thank you for having me. Audience: Excuse me but his mic… Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 17 Donald Amorosi: Oh it’s not here? Can you hear me back there now? Mayor Laufenburger: Nann could you turn up the visitor mic just a little bit please? Okay there you go. Donald Amorosi: So I would congratulate the Red Birds but looks like they all chose not to stick around for the boring part of the agenda. Mayor Laufenburger: Wait a minute there’s no boring part of a City Council agenda Mr. Amorosi. Donald Amorosi: I thought I heard you say that. Mayor Laufenburger: Well maybe I did so. Donald Amorosi: I don’t find it boring. So first I’m, it’s remarkable that you spend 45 minutes with them. The level of engagement and the knowledge that you displayed towards their team was remarkable and that you committed 45 minutes of a room full of people’s time too I think is great. I’m envious of it. I’m looking forward to see how much time you spend on a topic that I think is very important. So I want to start by clearly stating that what I’m about to say requires no discussion about the open investigation associated with my 16 year old son’s, our 16 year old son’s tragic and unnecessary killing at his mother’s home in Chanhassen 2 months ago this Thursday. It precipitates it. One month ago I came before this group and presented and asked for a measure of condolence. I asked for some accountability and a description of action taken or to be taken by the council. I also asked for guidance about where to go if the council isn’t the place where I should be presenting this information. Since that time I’ve had 2 informal, unofficial calls with a council member. Elise I thank you very much for doing that. I think a couple people said we’d be happy to put signs in our yard for you for re-election. I appreciate that you took the time to speak with me at length twice. Unfortunately those have been so far unproductive. I also got 2 email responses from 2 council members to an email I sent to them last night. Aside from that I’ve heard nothing from this committee in any way, shape or form about the inquiry that I made and the request that I made when I was here a month ago. Over the same period of time this past month I participated in numerous meetings with several advocacy groups, countless individuals, law enforcement, journalists, attorneys, even individuals at the highest levels of Minnesota State government. With the same publicly available information that you have they all offered support. Some offered to take action. Most all stated that things went very wrong in Chanhassen on July 13th and possibly before and after. What none of them told me is that they could not talk to me because of an open investigation. Tonight I’m back before this council in hopes of a different answer and if you can’t answer me because of that open investigation excuse, then please take note and pounce on it when it’s closed. So I’d like to ask for this. A response to my oral presentation. A description of what actions the council has taken and what it has learned to date with respect to conducting a broad review of the systems and resources available to residents with mental illness, particularly in crisis. And I’d like a plan for Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 18 actions the council intends to take in the future and when. Now I’m going to pause for a second. I’ve noticed you’ve broken from tradition and have engaged your last 2 presenters quite actively so I’ll give you a chance to do so with me right now if you wish. If you have nothing to say I’ll continue. Mayor Laufenburger: You’re welcome to continue Mr. Amorosi. Donald Amorosi: Okay. I believe that this council and this city has a unique obligation to aggressively pursue the truth and to inspire or even mandate learnings and change where needed so that this community addresses the significant and growing problems with how those with mental illness are treated. You see what I consider to be one of the most alarming tragedies in years happened in your town to one of your residents. Not just one really. Many of us and on your watch. And the systems, the schools, the crisis teams, law enforcement and so forth are contracted by you to provide services in accordance with your requirements and are paid for with our dollars. So to me you’re in a uniquely situated position unlike anyone else. In this view I have some recommendations that I ask you consider adopting. It doesn’t appear to me that you have anything to offer so I will go out on a limb and offer you some things to consider. One, participate if not chair a homicide review that the Minnesota Department of Health will soon commence. They’ve even suggested and welcome that you chair that committee. This review will be designed to understand, innovate and focus prevention and intervention resources. Two, meet with Health Partners applicable leadership to discuss Make It Okay. Make It Okay is a community based program intended to break down stigma and encourage positive mental health. They have asked for an audience. Audit your agreements with public safety and schools to determine whether funding is adequate and whether dollars are properly spent with respect to mental illness. Report formally and publicly your decisions and findings so I don’t have to keep doing this. And last find us a nice place to plant a tree in my son’s memory. Minnetonka High School won’t do it. So I’ll close with this. One in four people experience mental illness each year. According to NAMI one in five kids between the age of 18, 13 and 18 suffer from mental illness. That’s more kids in Minnetonka Schools appear to think use drugs or alcohol. And what’s worst is they wait almost 10 years to get treatment. So Mayor Laufenburger the last time I was here you said something along the lines of don’t interrupt silence with a lack of concern. What I don’t want to do next is have to figure out how to interrupt passivity. Thank you for allowing me this time. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Mr. Amorosi. Could I make a request? Donald Amorosi: Want me to stay up? Mayor Laufenburger: Please. You were very specific in your requests. I would like to make sure that the council has an opportunity to review those in our time. Could you possibly make a copy of your comments available to us? Donald Amorosi: Yes, certainly. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 19 Mayor Laufenburger: Would you be okay with that? Donald Amorosi: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Would you, you can either do that via email to our city manager or you can make a copy, or if you want to give that to us right now that would be helpful. Donald Amorosi: I’ll send it to you. I’ll send it to you. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Donald Amorosi: What out of coincidence is your time? Mayor Laufenburger: Say that again? Donald Amorosi: You said on your time. What is that? Is that 10 years? 10 days? Mayor Laufenburger: On my time. Donald Amorosi: It seems like I recall some things that maybe you don’t say or maybe you don’t remember saying. Never mind. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, thank you Mr. Amorosi. Is there any other visitor presentation at this time? Alright at this time I will conclude visitor presentations. Thank you. Just a reminder to the citizens that we have visitor presentation at all of our regularly scheduled council meetings and you’re welcome to address the council on any matter that’s of concern to you and with that I’m going to bring it back to the agenda. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: And that concludes the formal business. Now we’re going to move to council presentations. Is there any council presentation at this time? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Yes. Councilwoman Ryan: Well I have two but I, I know we concluded visitor presentations but I would like to comment on Mr. Amorosi and some of his requests. I know we’re bringing it back to council but he addressed the conversations that I had with him and I would like to address what he and I talked about publicly and some of the actions that in response to the conversation that we had. I know this is an election. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 20 Mayor Laufenburger: Just a sec. We have an agenda item that is specifically discussion and possible action regarding the recent correspondence from Mr. Amorosi. Is your comments, could it directly impact our discussion and our actions? Councilwoman Ryan: No this is an opportunity for council presentation and I would like to address this. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay please, yep go ahead. Councilwoman Ryan: So I’m not going to pull any punches because I know that the thoughts about election season and in my conversation with Mr. Amorosi I said to him specifically I am calling you number one, because I regretted, I regretted not offering my condolences the night at the meeting and I’m calling as a council member. More importantly as a community member. I have children that are in the Minnetonka School District and I’m not calling on behalf of council but as an individual in the community. We had, I explained to him at that point that I was up for, running for an office with City Council and in no way was I doing this because of my run for mayor. So one of the, a couple of the questions that he posed to me had to do with the Carver County Crisis Center and I talked to Mr. Gerhardt and asked what responsibilities we had as a city with the Carver County Crisis Center and that is not oversight which the City has and I explained that to Mr. Amorosi. Second we talked about training and we received information on mental health training from our officers which I also shared. What I did offer because of my affiliation with Tonka Cares and relationships that I have with the Minnetonka School Board because a lot of the concerns that he has have to do with decisions that are made at the school board level but I would be willing to individually talk to those people and gather individuals to see what we can do to address mental health in our community. Again as a community member, not as much as a council member. We did in a subsequent conversation he presented the Minnesota Department of Health review as well as the Health Partner, the Make It Okay program and that is something that I’m still willing to be a member of or participate in in terms of gathering information. We can bring it back at the council level, whether I’m a representative of council or I do it as a community member that’s involved with the school board and Minnetonka School District and work with people in the District 112 as well. So obviously mental health advocacy comes from leadership in our community and whether I’m on council or not on council or affiliated with the school board, this is something that is important to me and I’m willing to do it on that. In every conversation I always made it very clear that I did not want to discuss anything to do with the investigation. That this was strictly revolving around the mental health issue that we’re facing in the country but in particularly in our city so I just wanted to clarify some of the commentary and make sure that it was very clear that I was going it as an individual. Would like to do it as a council member but I just wanted to make sure I cleared the air on that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Is there any other council presentations? Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 21 Councilwoman Ryan: I have one more on a separate note and I’m glad Mr. Hoffman is still here because I would like to congratulate the Chanhassen Parks and Rec System Plan team for being selected as a recipient of the Excellence in Community Engagement Award for 2018. This was a tremendous effort led by our Parks and Rec Director Todd Hoffman and the team consisted of a wide range of the Park and Rec Commission, Environmental Commission, Senior Commission, and we had a great group of individuals you know that were affiliated with the city but we also had members from Carver County, the Arts Consortium, and if I’m, am I missing anything? I think then oh members at large from both 276 and 112 and we held a number of meetings to try to outline that plan but the reason we’re getting this recognition is because of community engagement and it was a wonderful effort because we had open houses. Pop up tents at the farmers market and dog park. We had an interactive web on our website where people could pin point where there are missing links in our system. Our parks and rec system today and what they would like to see in the future. And I think that it is a very well deserved award and I wanted to congratulate the team. I was very pleased to be a part of that team and be part of that process and congratulate you Mr. Hoffman on leading the charge on it and I’m very pleased that we got this award so I just wanted to say congratulations. Todd Hoffman: Thank you. Councilwoman Ryan: Thanks. And that’s it for me. Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, any other council presentation? Alright at this time I would like to address the agenda item that I had, that was added to the agenda. This is a discussion and possible action regarding recent correspondence from Mr. Amorosi and each of you were presented with a copy of both the email that was sent by Mr. Amorosi to the council members. And let me just make sure that was sent on Sunday, September 9th at 3:49 p.m. and I’m, you have copies of it so I don’t need to read that for you but essentially it’s asking for, the purpose of this email is to request that an agenda item be added to the Chanhassen City Council meeting on Tuesday, September 18th. We don’t meet on that particular day, but to provide eager constituents, specifically a response to my oral presentation. I reviewed that oral presentation and I’ve made some notes and I’m doing this, and each of you could see that video that Mr. Amorosi made, or that presentation he made on August 13th. But his request as I interpret it is he requested the City Council form and fund if necessary an independent committee that reports to the City Council made up of number one, a person from social services. Number two, a representative from the area crisis center. Number three, a member of law enforcement. Number four, a council member. Number five, a mental health professional. A parent, a student and an educator and a member of the press. And his request further went on to say that none of these are to be employed or affiliated with the City or the County and he has, his specific words is that he would like us to charge this committee with the task to evaluate the circumstances around this tragedy identifying breakdowns in opportunities and looking for better systems and improvements in protocol and procedures which may reduce, if not eliminate this from happening ever again and Mr. Amorosi went on to say that he believes that neither the judiciary, and I assume that he means law enforcement by that, or the BCA have brought enough reach on Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 22 this tragedy. Neither of those are advocates for the constituency. He believes the council is to be advocates. So that’s the verbal presentation that Mr. Amorosi made on August 13th and what I would like to do is open that particular topic for discussion specifically around the question, council number one, is there anything in your view that I might have missed in my brief summary of Mr. Amorosi’s presentation and number two is, is there anything that you as a council would like to suggest that we do regarding this. But before I turn this to the council I would like to ask this question. Mr. Knutson, are you familiar with Mr. Amorosi’s request on August 13th? Roger Knutson: Mayor, members of the council I was not present that night. I was on vacation but I’ve been, learned about through these emails to a certain extent and from the presentations tonight. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Is there anything you would like to comment on the council’s, let’s call it the council’s official responsibility in responding to Mr. Amorosi’s request? I realize that I’m asking you a lawyer so that’s the context that I’m looking for. Roger Knutson: The City Council if it chose to do and thinks it would be appropriate could discuss and develop policies on dealing with mental illness but we should be, you have to be very careful to stay away from the particular incident involving the tragedy that was discussed because that is under investigation by the BCA and it will be, a decision will be made by the County Attorney and the City has no role in that and you wouldn’t want to try to influence it. That would be inappropriate. If you want to study mental health issues in general and how it should be responded you could do that if you choose to but staying away from that tragic incident. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. We do have some new information that has been shared with the council too and that is that I inquired of Mr., County Attorney Mark Metz regarding the timing. In the most recent email from Mr. Amorosi he suggested that the investigation will likely be closed by 9/18. So let me give you, council members the facts on this. Mr. Metz responded to my inquiry, he said Dear Mayor Laufenburger. In response to your request inquiry please be advised that I expect that the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension will have substantially completed it’s comprehensive investigation regarding the officer involved shooting this Friday, September 14th. The Carver County Attorney’s office will give review of these materials our highest priority. While I cannot give you a concrete date for our final legal determination as I must exercise due diligence in examining the materials, I plan to make a final decision within 30 days unless unforeseen events occur. Please note that until I make my final decision all law enforcement reports remain classified as confidential. So Mr. Amorosi however he came to that date of 9/18, that was not far off but I would say that according to County Attorney he will take 30 days unless unforeseen events occur before he makes his final decision and just a reminder that that, elements of that investigation will remain confidential until one of two things occurs. Number one, either no charges will be filed at which time the investigation data will become available immediately. Or if charges are filed after the case has concluded it’s, Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 23 what’s the, final disposition I guess. Final disposition of the charges. Whether found guilty. Not guilty. Whatever that might be, then the information will become available. Is that correct Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: Close. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Roger Knutson: Investigative material becomes public after the time to appeal is out. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Roger Knutson: So if he’s found guilty or found innocent. Found guilty for example. I’m not suggesting he would be, or if he pleads guilty, investigative data remains confidential until after that appeal period runs. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So the, what we’re talking about is the BCA investigation. That material will remain confidential until such time that it becomes public information. So that brings me back to the question that I wanted to raise and that is council, regarding Mr. Amorosi’s verbal request on August 13, which he is asking for a response to in his most current email, is there any action or direction that you as a council, or us as a council would be in favor of adopting? Councilman Campion: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Campion. Councilman Campion: So my heart breaks for the Amorosi’s and what they’ve endured. I do have extended family members that have had issues with mental health and I know how difficult that can be to deal with and I am supportive of you know looking at what we can do to partner with the community and local schools to address mental health so I personally am supportive of looking into or starting such a committee. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anything else? Councilman Campion: For now that’s it. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Anybody else? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Councilmember Ryan. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 24 Councilwoman Ryan: I’ll follow up on what I said before. I would, I’d like to get more information. I don’t know Mr. Amorosi if you can pass it along to the City Manager but what the Minnesota Department of Health is specifically looking for as well as the Health Partners mental, the Make It Okay program and bring that along with some of the other information you brought tonight. Your request with planting a tree. I think those were the 3, the ones that I picked up on but bring it back to a work session where we can discuss it as a council. What these programs are. What the role of the City would be in establishing that relationship and have the discussion at a work session. And then make some decisions going forward from there. Mayor Laufenburger: And just in brief how would you capsulize the objective of the work session? I’m not disagreeing with you. I’m just trying to figure out. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. Mayor Laufenburger: Because ultimately we’re going to be directing staff and I want to make sure that we direct staff with clear information. Does that make sense? Councilwoman Ryan: Well we could talk mental health. I mean that’s so broad. I mean I think you know exactly, well maybe staff doesn’t understand. If you could get the information from Mr. Amorosi or if Mr. Amorosi can pass it along to Mr. Gerhardt what those programs are and I think we should review it based on the request brought forward by Mr. Amorosi. Amorosi. I’m just thrashing your name every time I say it. Amorosi, correct. Donald Amorosi: Yes. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, Mr. Amorosi. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council. Mayor Laufenburger: Yep. Todd Gerhardt: The way I understand it we would get those different programs. Define those programs for you. When they were established. How they exist. How to be a part of them. How to develop a community based program from those and bring that back to you and look for direction from council if there’s anything that you would want to do with either of those two programs. As long as it has nothing to do with the investigation that is more within your rights to develop such a program. As to the memorial tree, we have a memorial tree program and it’s, a name would go out on the tree that you see in the hallway and then work with our Park and Rec Director in finding a location somewhere within the community. There is a cost of about $500 for the tree and the planting and we would work with you in finding a location that’s appropriate and suggest some spots throughout the community and his name would be placed on the Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 25 memorial tree in the hallway and then I think there is a placard that also goes where the tree is planted. Mayor Laufenburger: And who should Mr. Amorosi connect with on that? Todd Gerhardt: Todd Hoffman. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay Mr. Hoffman. You got that Donald? Okay. Donald Amorosi: Ted or Todd? Todd Gerhardt: Todd. Mayor Laufenburger: Todd. Todd Gerhardt: Can’t have enough Todd’s. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Any other comment on this? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Sure, Councilmember Tjornhom. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I think that what Mr. Amorosi is trying to do is start the healing process for his family and the community and prevent another family from having to go through what you’re going through and I think this is a great way to start and I think the most important thing is, is education and support for families that are struggling with mental health issues and aren’t necessarily finding resources that can help them. And so I would suggest that you know even as a city, as a council or as a special group that those resources are brought in. I know NAMI is very supportive and is very willing to speak and the Mayor of Savage is actually President of NAMI in Scott County. She has a son that she’s dealt with for years with mental health issues and I know also that it’s a struggle because there aren’t facilities to help you. You know there aren’t facilities for treatment of mental illness. A lot of times they’ll just be ending up going to jail or to a halfway house in Duluth or wherever it may be and that’s not the solution either and so I do feel for you and I do want to help and I’m offering any of my knowledge I have. Not of how to help you but how to help you find the resources and start those groups and start those educational programs that can actually start the dialogue with everybody. You know we all would like to step back the day before everything happened and prevent it if we can somehow and so I am willing, not on the council level but as a professional person that deals with social programs and helping people find resources to help you and even like I said, get a list going and get some educational programs going for you if that would help at all. Mayor Laufenburger: Anything else Councilmember Tjornhom? Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 26 Councilwoman Tjornhom: No. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, anybody else? Let’s see. Councilmembers, I think that we need to recognize that, and both Councilmember Tjornhom and Councilmember Ryan said this that when we choose to become elected officials there are some things that we lose the right to do. I can’t have conversations with two of you that could possibly migrate to business conversations because that’s a violation of the open meeting law. We can’t meet for casual social experiences to, without posting it as a potential public meeting. There are things that I would like to say as a citizen to many people in this community but because of my title and my role as mayor I have to use judgment about how I make my comments. Mr. Amorosi stated that, with the exception of emails from two of the council members, and I don’t think he was referring to the one that I sent him, he hasn’t heard any condolences. Well I know that Mr. Gerhardt was at the vigil that was conducted for Archer. I previously stated that I was at his funeral. I didn’t make it known that the mayor was there. I wasn’t there as mayor. I was there as a grieving citizen grieving over the loss of somebody that was important in the community. So each of us choose to console and offer condolences in our different ways but there are I believe that there are judgments that we must make as elected officials to ensure that our individual actions do not create the potential for a liability for the city. So let me repeat again that this is not passivity. This is not silence. This is deep caring for our community and there are restrictions on what we, well I believe there are restrictions on what we can do. I’m going to offer a direction to staff and I’m going to ask that once I conclude this that perhaps it be made in the form of a motion. First of all I would like to direct staff to work with our attorney to prepare a response to Mr. Amorosi. A response to his most recent email. That message was sent to council members but this falls in the category of official correspondence and I would like staff and Mr. Knutson to prepare an appropriate response. I would also like to direct staff to create a work session where the council can talk about and learn about the different programs that are available to families, people who are dealing with individuals that have stress related issues. Anxiety. Mental health. Perhaps addiction issues. That work session would be worthwhile but include in that work session not an education, not only an education for council but also bring examples about how other communities similar to Chanhassen. Similar in size. Similar in make up, what they have done to address this. I know that some organizations or some cities have what are known as human rights commissions. We don’t have a human rights commission. Perhaps this is something that might precipitate the formation of a human rights commission so that’s what I would like to see happen but I would like that to come from somebody in the form of a motion. Is there such a motion? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor? Mayor Laufenburger: Yes Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: I’d like to make a motion. I’d like to make the motion that the City Council recommends that Mr. Knutson prepares a formal response to the email sent by Mr. Chanhassen City Council – September 10, 2018 27 Amorosi, number one. And number two, the direction to staff to put on a work session agenda addressing the mental health, mental health education. Mayor Laufenburger: Do you mind incorporating the related cities? Examples of what other cities. Councilwoman Ryan: And what other cities are currently doing. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Councilman McDonald: I’ll second. Mayor Laufenburger: Is that a valid motion Mr. Knutson? Roger Knutson: Yes Mayor it is. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. And Mr. McDonald seconded that. Is there any further discussion? Councilwoman Ryan moved, Councilman McDonald seconded that the City Council recommends that Mr. Knutson prepares a formal response to the email sent by Mr. Amorosi, direct staff to put on a work session agenda an item addressing mental health education, and to provide examples of what other cities are doing to address these issues. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: That motion carries 5-0. Is there any other council presentations at this time? ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt any administrative presentations at this time? Todd Gerhardt: None at this time. I know we’re going to go back into work session and it’s getting late so nothing to add. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. I’d accept a motion to adjourn. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Ryan seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated August 28, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.2. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Park & Recreation Commission minutes dated August 28, 2018.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Park and Recreation Commission Summary Minutes dated August 28, 2018 Park and Recreation Commission Verbatim Minutes dated August 28, 2018 CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES AUGUST 28, 2018 Chairman Scharfenberg called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Scharfenberg, Cole Kelly, Rick Echternacht, Jim Boettcher, Meredith Petouvis, and Joe Scanlon, MEMBERS ABSENT: Karl Tsuchiya, and Grant Schaeferle STAFF PRESENT: Todd Hoffman, Park and Rec Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent; and Adam Beer, Park Superintendent APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman Scharfenberg approved the agenda as presented. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Chairman Scharfenberg announced that the Chanhassen Red Birds will be playing in the Class B State Championship Tournament. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Echternacht moved, Boettcher seconded to approve the Summary Minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting dated July 24, 2018 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 2019-2023 PARK AND TRAIL ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP). Todd Hoffman presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Kelly asked about 2018 park revenues and the status of the tennis courts at the Rec Center being converting it into pickleball courts. Chairman Scharfenberg asked about potential future trails associated with road projects. Kelly moved, Echternacht seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve a 2019-2023 Park and Trail Acquisition and Development CIP totaling $1,215,000 to complete the projects listed in Attachment #2. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Park and Recreation Commission Summary – August 28, 2018 2 REPORTS: MANCHESTER NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CONSTRUCTION AND HIGHWAY 101 TRAIL CONSTRUCTION AT FOXWOOD. Adam Beer gave a power point presentation on the construction of the Manchester neighborhood park and Highway 101 trail construction at Foxwood. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS. None. COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET. Commissioner Kelly asked for clarification on the land that was transferred to the City of Shorewood. Kelly moved, Echternacht seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned 8:10 p.m. Submitted by Todd Hoffman Park and Rec Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 28, 2018 Chairman Scharfenberg called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Scharfenberg, Cole Kelly, Rick Echternacht, Jim Boettcher, Meredith Petouvis, and Joe Scanlon, MEMBERS ABSENT: Karl Tsuchiya, and Grant Schaeferle STAFF PRESENT: Todd Hoffman, Park and Rec Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent; and Adam Beer, Park Superintendent APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman Scharfenberg approved the agenda as presented. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Scharfenberg: Todd any public announcements: Hoffman: None other than the Red Birds. Scharfenberg: Yeah I’ll make an announcement about the Chanhassen Red Birds are in the State Class B Championship, or playoff’s I should say and they have proceeded into the semi-finals against two time defending champions Miesville Mudhens. Mudhens and they play this coming Saturday in Jordan at 2:00 so if you don’t have any plans this Labor Day weekend travel down to Miesville. You can also check out the bracket on the Minnesota Baseball Association.org website because if they win on Saturday then they would end up playing again on Monday. So we support the Red Birds and hope they continue onto the State Championship. Hoffman: Jordan on Saturday. Scharfenberg: Jordan. Hoffman: Jordan yep at the Jordan Mini Met so you can’t, don’t miss the Met or the Mini Met. Scharfenberg: Yep and other games and I would say check the website if you do want to go to a game because they’re not all at Jordan. Shakopee is also hosting and I think maybe games would be played on Monday at Shakopee so alright. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Kelly: Point of order. Scharfenberg: Okay. Kelly: All I could pull up was the summary when I went to pull Minutes. I don’t think we can vote on this until we have the full Minutes. Scharfenberg: Okay. Hoffman: The tape recording did not work that night so summary minutes is what we’re going to have. Kelly: Oh it is? Hoffman: Yep. Kelly: Okay. Hoffman: Apologize for that. Scharfenberg: So can we have a motion then to approve the summary Minutes for the July 24, 2018 meeting. Echternacht: So moved. Scharfenberg: We have a motion. Do we have a second? Boettcher: Second. Echternacht moved, Boettcher seconded to approve the Summary Minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting dated July 24, 2018 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL 2019-2023 PARK AND TRAIL ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP). Hoffman: Thank you Chair Scharfenberg, members of the commission. The motion this evening is that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve a 2019-2023 Park and Trail Acquisition and Development CIP totaling $1,215,000 to complete the projects listed in Attachment #2. So I’ll go over those individually year by year. Before I do that I’ll give you a little bit of update on where the park fund is at. The City recently wrote a half Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 3 a million dollar check to Gonyea or Fox Woods LLC for their first payment on the Highway 101 trail so we’re, the majority of that work is done and you’ll see that later on in Adam’s presentation. So with that check out of the fund the current balance is $1,487,000. $1,487,000 in the park fund. So we’re still, the fund is still viable and has a positive balance but this year as you recall in total will be about a $1.3 million dollar year with Lake Ann, excuse me. Lake Susan lights, the Highway 101 trail construction at $835,000. Lake Susan lights for right around that $300,000 mark and then the Manchester Park about $150,000. So in comparison you’ve invested $1.3 million in 2018 and we’re looking at a $1.2 million 5 year CIP so it’s quite a reduction and that’s based on really some themes that I’ll talk about tonight so the themes are what’s in. What’s in the recommended CIP. What’s out. What’s out of the recommended CIP. And what price changes are there so as we talk about these projects that were, the majority of the projects, what’s out is anything that we are not obligated to perform. What’s in are projects that we’re obligated to perform by a development contract through development agreement that we have with someone in the city. So some development that we’re obligated to complete a project. Either the County. The Arboretum trail. The lot out in the Arboretum Business Park so those we’re obligated. Those need to stay in by contract and we’ll talk about some prices changes on those particular projects. Any questions before I start? Kelly: Todd the $500,000 that came out before you gave us the $1.487? Hoffman: Correct. Kelly: Thank you. Hoffman: Okay. 2019 the recommended projects, so I’ll talk about picnic tables and tree planting once. So annually we buy a variety of things, not just picnic tables and benches but there could be some trash receptacles or something that comes out of there so it’s kind of like park equipment. For the most part it is picnic tables and some benches and that $10,000 is typically expended on an annual basis so there’s not really a year that we don’t utilize that money. For example next year the entire $10,000 will be utilized to buy those two shaded picnic tables for the Roundhouse pickleball. And so similar to the two that we have at the Rec Center and the two that we have out in front here we’ll purchase two there. Pour them a concrete pad. Kind of a patio. If you’ve watched that pickleball it’s a real social activity. People show up. There might be 10 or 12 people that show up at a time. They put their paddles down and they stand around and sit and have a conversation and without having a place to do that what they’ve done is we’ve offered a couple of picnic tables and they’ve brought their own shade umbrellas so we might as well provide that since it is such an integral part of the sport that they play. So that’s just one example. For next year that money will already be expended just for those two singular picnic tables. Tree planting, on an annual basis we’re planting trees in a variety of locations and that is both replacement but then just new parks and new tree initiatives so that is complimented by oh probably double that or more from the planning department. Jill Sinclair and her group so if you take the, you know Jill’s, she’s investing $30,000 plus and we’re investing $15,000 so that gives you at least $50,000 a year is being invested in new trees in this Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 4 community so it’s a big chunk of cash and it’s an important initiative annually. 2019 we’ll have, that’s next year we’ll have tennis court rehabilitation. $150,000. That’s a non-park fund source of cash and we’ll be taking a look at a variety of courts. Both rehabilitating and then complete reconstruction where necessary. So that’s a project that’s coming up next year. The Arboretum trail on Highway 41, pedestrian underpass cost share. So we’ve installed that in 2020. It’s now at $600,000 and so in a previous budget it probably may have been listed at $400,000. In a previous budget to that it was listed at $150,000 I believe so that’s the County’s current best estimate for the City share. The Arboretum will pay that as well. The Arboretum will pay the $600,000. The City will pay the $600,000. The grant is about $1.2 million from the Federal Transportation so it’s a significant project. That’s the trail from Century Boulevard into the Arboretum and then over to the other side. The County is starting to send a memorandum of understanding or a MOU in that we’ll talk about the formula. So if costs do come in lower or higher that $600,000 will either go up or down based on where those bids come in. Kelly: I’m sorry Todd, did I miss it. When are the bids supposed to come in for that? Hoffman: It’s a 2019 project so they’ll probably come in after the first of the year. Kelly: Okay, thank you. Hoffman: And that’s a County project and so we’re a party to that and we may have to write some checks back to the County in 2019. More likely in 2020 that’s why we put it in both those years. Scharfenberg: But it’s just one sum of $600,000 right? Hoffman: Correct. Scharfenberg: Correct. Hoffman: Total. Chanhassen Nature Preserve trail extension. This currently is involved with a business called Control Concepts. They’re in for a site plan review. They may or may not move forward. The original dollar amount was $90,000 to build the trail. We don’t know where the numbers are going to end up because there’s right now a negotiation over some wall costs. Some retaining wall costs and so it may end up to be closer to that $90,000 if this project moves through depending on where we end up with the negotiations it could be higher than that so I’ve put a number of $200,000 in there and that may be the number. It might be something less. It might be something more depending on where this all goes. Control Concepts is currently deciding if they want to, even want to move forward because of the cost of the walls. They’re not associated with the trail. The trail would be at the bottom of the walls but the walls need to be built to support this building pad that they’re creating out there and this is the business just north of Mamac Systems on Century Boulevard. And there’s also the site is being, it’s expensive because they’re stormwater utilities would have to go underneath the parking lot which raises Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 5 their cost for their project so I can’t tell you exactly where that’s going to land but that’s the current estimate at least based on the design that is, it may be back into council at their next meeting or if they decide to withdraw they’ll withdraw. And then in 2019, and this is related to why we need to start putting some projects on hold and saving some cash and that has to do with Lake Ann Park expansion feasibility study. So if Lennar moves forward with a successful preliminary plat and a final plat and the City is granted access in the deed to 98 acres of property that we need to then have a plan for a trail expansion. That’s what this would do so a feasibility study says what’s the character of the property. What is the access? What do you have to build to make this happen? How feasible is it and what will it cost? So that $35,000 would perform that work and we would have a plan that would tell us costs. Structures. Building materials. You know permitting. All those different costs would be analyzed. So that’s what a feasibility study does. Any questions on 2019 or what got dropped out of 2019? I’m not sure that anything was dropped. No, no projects were dropped so that’s what we have for 2019. 2020, picnic tables and tree planting and then the Arboretum trail on Highway 41 pedestrian underpass cost share. The $600,000 and that includes the trail and then the underpass of State Highway 41 so Highway 41, the underpass would be just south of Highway 5 and then the trail would go around the back side of the large Arboretum sign. Pretty significant project. Again $600,000. You’re looking at the costs of these recent trail projects, the 101 trail extension at Fox Wood. $835,000 you get a fairly small section of trail but down to an underpass. It’s really a nice project and then this $600,000 which is just our share of a much larger project to gain access to the Arboretum via bicycle and pedestrian access so pretty significant. Yeah the cost is significant. If you look back, a few years back also Highway 41 that trail, beautiful trail. Significant cost on the city share but again that was combined with the County and we were above the $600,000 at that time. And again like many projects that started probably south of $100,000 that everybody thought our costs were going to be and by the time we were all said and done it was over $600,000 so. Echternacht: Todd that’s just, the $600,000 is just the underpass? Hoffman: Nope, the $600,000 is our share for everything. All costs combined and so that includes the trail from Century to Highway 41, under the underpass and then into the Arboretum, all the way through the Arboretum and then out the other side. So you get both the trail and the underpass. And then in 2020 the project that would be taken out or terminated would be Bandimere Park sport court is a current project in 2020 for $245,000 for the construction of this states one tennis and 4 pickleball or a sport court. So that would be removed and not included in the 2019 to 2023 CIP. That’s $245,000 at Bandimere. And also, no that’s it. The cost share, the last figure was $350,000 and now from $350,000 we’re up to the $600,000 so those are the price changes that I referred to. Those two items. 2021 there’s, other than picnic tables and benches there are no park fund projects. Just another round of tennis court rehabilitation and so those tennis courts are on a schedule and 2021 is the second half of that schedule at half the cost. 2022 no projects. Just again banking money for, by that time if Lake Ann goes through something will be happening so it’s not in here. That feasibility study will identify the process. It will identify the year and you know it’s going to be a big number. It’s going to be a million dollar trail project. You know it could be less than that. Could be more than that but it’s going to be a Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 6 significant number so one of those years that we’re currently not showing a project, that project would come in if you move forward with that. And if Lennar is building you know 150-200 homes on that property, that’s when the City wants to be in there constructing the trail so all the construction takes place at one time and when houses start to be sold both the new residents and the existing neighborhoods can have access to that park space. I wouldn’t want to be the one holding them up. After all that drama. So 2021 and 2022, no projects identified and then 2023 the same picnic table, tree planting. Just saving money for Lake Ann and then also there’s a Lake Ann pavilion roof replacement in there so if you’ve seen that roof, it’s wood shakes and they’re, you could say they currently look like they’re in need of replacement and what we’re going to make them based on Finance Director Greg Sticha’s timing we’re going to make it to 2023 so that’s what I have for you in the CIP. Scharfenberg: Todd what are the other, there have to be some other items that are coming out in those last 3 years. Hoffman: Let’s take a look. $640,000 in 2023 for the Bandimere Community Park picnic shelter so 2023 had $640,000 in there for that item. Kelly: There was $150,000 for Recreation Center fence, dugouts and backstops. Not sure what year that was. Hoffman: In 2021. Yeah that comes out. So you’ve got about a million backing out of Bandimere and $150,000 out of the Rec Center in 2021. And those are the projects. Thank you. So we’ve always talked about it’s a fluid document. It changes. It’s the commission’s responsibility to decide if these recommendations are the right direction for the Park CIP to go and then make a recommendation to the City Council. So I’ll answer questions and I’ll wait for your discussion. Scharfenberg: Open it up for questions for Todd. Kelly: Todd I see for 2018 you’ve got $500,000 in revenues. Are we on track for that or is that what we pulled in and there might be more? How’s that match where we’re at today? Hoffman: 2018, we’re on track for that. Yep. Kelly: Okay. Is that for the full year or is that up to now? Hoffman: No that’s for the full year. And then Finance Director Sticha agreed to go from the $200,000 to $300,000 since we haven’t, we’ve been making that number for. Kelly: That’s that last $300,000. Hoffman: For a long time. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 7 Kelly: Thank you. Hoffman: And that’s going to fluctuate based on the schedule of primarily of Avienda. So Avienda has modified their site plan from, they’ve reduced the amount of retail and increased the amount of housing which will generate more revenue but they’ve also continued to ask for park fee credit for their Bluff Creek Overlay District so they’ve got that large Bluff Creek Overlay District that they would, needs to be retained because they have to have some green space but now they’re asking to get credit for it as well so there’s still some ground to cover on that particular item. There’s other projects as well that are coming in that will generate some fees. What you’re currently seeing going in the ground is what has supported the park fund so south on 101. The West Park. Senior Housing. Those are the kind of projects that have been funding that park fund. In fact for that singular year the Park West was the only item that saved the park fund that year. That singular. Kelly: Have we had any internal discussion on the tennis court rehab at the Rec Center? The pickleball people requested that we make them all pickleball courts. What’s the talk at City Hall about that right now? Hoffman: So our thought is that we’re not a pickleball mecca and we could make another, we could change all those to pickleball and then we would have just a lot of outside people coming here to play pickleball and so we could, if that’s what we want to do that’s certainly an option as a commission and the community but we have 10 pickleball courts in a community of 23,000 which is way above the average pickleball court per person in the metro area. We’re likely we’re at the highest. Eden Prairie might be catching up right now but we’re still one of the highest per capita pickleball court providers in the metropolitan area and so it’s our belief we currently don’t need additional courts. The Bandimere could use those courts in the future and that’s a decision at that location. So you know tennis and pickleball are both sports that people still want to play. If we built, took the two tennis courts out and built another 6 pickleball would they be utilized? Yes. Primarily by people outside of our community. Kelly: Plus you know the Rec Center’s not really a neighborhood park either. There’s no homes within about a half mile and you know we utilize, if people come in for baseball and soccer to Lake Ann, Bandimere and Lake Susan from outside the city. You’re making it sound like it’s a bad thing that we have people coming in from outside the city and I would disagree with that. And pickleball people like to spend money so hopefully we can, you know retain them in town and have them eat around town. So I’d be in favor of making the pickleball courts. We see stunning growth there and you know there’s been no growth in tennis. It’s actually gone backwards significantly since the 1970’s when it was very popular. So that’s my two cents for the pickleball courts. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 8 Hoffman: It’s going to be, so those courts are up so we talked about presenting that in January so we’ve got some time between now and then as a commission. We’ll present you with a report based on what our recommendation is and then the commission can decide. Scharfenberg: Todd is there anything else that’s on the horizon in terms of you know trails that would be associated with any roadwork or anything like that that we would have some responsibility for? Anything that you’re aware of that we should potentially have in here. Hoffman: So Galpin Boulevard north of Highway 5 will be a project. There’ll be trails on both sides and how those will be financed will most likely be through road funds but it’s still, I think some of you commissioners have been around long enough to know that if the money runs out they’ll take a look at anywhere for some cash so that’s a possibility. But it’s more apt when a project comes in that’s associated with a subdivision and we’re the driver of the trail project then they’re going to look to us to finance it. In this case this is a County/City road project. It should be financed through County and City road funds and I don’t think that we’re going to be expending any dollars there. But there was some discussion about an underpass and anytime you get an underpass you get costs go up and so they might be looking at some dollars. Beyond that Lyman Boulevard is going to be improved west of Galpin and there could be some trails associated with that. Scharfenberg: When is that scheduled for, do we know? Hoffman: Still a debate. There’s still a debate going on there. Not sure when the scheduling is. And then 101 down the bluff is going to be another you know big trail project with a bridge and trails so there’s still projects yet to be completed in the future. Scharfenberg: But nothing you don’t think that we would need to put any place note. Place holder for. Hoffman: I’m not going to be the first one to jump out in front, no. Any other questions for Todd? Kelly: I don’t have any questions for Todd but I think we need to pretty much approve the budget as it is…other things when we’ve got Lake Ann looming a few years down the road. Hopefully we’ll have some money here or the City Council will figure out something for that so I think we’re kind of pigeonholed in where we have to be where we are. So I mean the only thing I’d like to see that’s different is just a little deal on whether we make Chanhassen Rec Center all pickleball courts or…tennis courts and obviously we’re refurbishing 4 other tennis courts next year also. So I’d just like to see something presented to us on that. Other than that I’m ready to approve the budget…this month or next month I guess it doesn’t matter that much. Hoffman: This needs to be turned in by Friday. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 9 Kelly: I guess matters more and more. Scharfenberg: Okay. Kelly: We used to be able to do this in September-October didn’t it? Scharfenberg: Any other comments by anyone? Okay if not I would entertain a motion with respect to this item. Kelly: Oh here we are. I found it. I propose a motion that the Park and Rec Commission recommends the City Council approve the 2019 to 2023 Park and Trail Acquisition and Development Capital Improvement Program (CIP) totaling $1,215,000 to complete the projects listed in Attachment 2. Scharfenberg: We have a motion. Do we have a second? Echternacht: I’ll second it. Kelly moved, Echternacht seconded that the Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve a 2019-2023 Park and Trail Acquisition and Development CIP totaling $1,215,000 to complete the projects listed in Attachment #2. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Scharfenberg: Motion carries. Hoffman: We’ll bring that Recreation Center, well we’ll bring the tennis court refurbishment plan back before the first of the year so we can decide so when we go out to bids we’ll know what we’re working on. Thank you. Kelly: Thanks Todd. Hoffman: Yep thank you. REPORTS: MANCHESTER NEIGHBORHOOD PARK CONSTRUCTION AND HIGHWAY 101 TRAIL CONSTRUCTION AT FOXWOOD.. Scharfenberg: Adam is that you? Beer: Yes sir. Scharfenberg: Alright. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 10 Beer: I’ve kind of put together just a brief power point to talk about both Manchester Park and the Highway 101 trail construction so just to give you guys and those who didn’t, were not able to attend the joint commission tour. These were two spots we stopped so just going to kind of go through some slides and kind of fill you guys in where we’re at and give you an opportunity to ask any questions if you have them. So we’re going to start with Manchester Park. This is just a concept drawing of the playground that you guys decided and voted on to go in at the park. Just kind of wanted to give you a little snapshot of what that is going to look like. Hoffman: That’s the same view as you’re looking at on these future slides so that’s looking from the water treatment plant towards the cul-de-sac. Beer: Correct. So we went on our joint commission tour which was on the 6th. We hadn’t broke ground yet. The engineering department was still kind of making some final grades so we were able to get in on the 16th of August. Our staff mobilized with Theis Construction which is a firm that we’ve used quite a bit over the last probably for 20 years. So we started on the 16th with laying out the playground border and started removing material which was then trucked from the site back to our shop and is now kind of being redistributed from, to the utility department and the street department so kind of worked out for us in that regard. So top left corner here you can see we’re starting to dig out the container. That process took about 4 days of just constant digging and transporting into our quad and tandem trucks. So once that process was complete drain tile was put in. The base of the container is all sloped so everything should funnel on our nice Chanhassen clay right to the drain tile and then out down the hill. Once that process was complete we brought in the three-quarter clear rock base which goes under all the sidewalks and the shelter pad. You can see in the bottom right corner everything is framed up and the first section of sidewalk and the footings were poured on the 23rd and they just finished yesterday the final pull of the sidewalk so just a few snapshots of what that looked like as of a few days ago and this is what it looked like this morning with a little bit of rain there but all the concrete is in. So basically what we have now is the two guys in the corner there are laying out the retaining wall so they are estimating about 2 days to have that in so everything passed inspection. We’re good to go. So once the retaining wall’s in there’s a final, I should say we missed one but just based on how we have to remove a chunk of curb that pushes up against the cul-de-sac there so once that’s removed the final 8 foot section is going to be poured back in place along with the shelter pad so that’s going to basically wrap up any of the concrete work that’s going to have to take place and the installer along with my staff, we’re going to do a joint installation which is going to start the 4th, which is right after Labor Day so we’re kind of hoping and planning right now to have that be about a 3 day process assuming we don’t run into any weather issues. So basically by the end of that week we should be done. The shelter structure’s going to be up and the playground should be in. Then my staff will move in. The contractor’s will be out of there and we’ll focus on final grading and restoration and seeding so that’s kind of a quick snapshot of where we’re at. Things are, you know we started pulling material out on the 16th so we’re making some good headway. We’ve only had one rain day so far which is good. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 11 Hoffman: Today? Beer: No actually last Friday they stopped at about 11:00 so we missed about a half a day. No they worked all day out there today so things are going well with Manchester. So we’re just kind of keeping our fingers crossed that we get in good construction weather. Scharfenberg: What did you say Adam in terms of your kind of completion deadline? Beer: Well we’re hopefully by the last week in September we’re going to have, I mean everything. We’re going to be all sitting out there together in the swings. That’s the goal. Wood chips in place. Seeding done. You know all the restoration’s going to be complete. That’s our goal so. Scharfenberg: Okay. Hoffman: Which is a park built in 45 days. About as fast as you can get it. Beer: Yeah. Things have kind of aligned pretty well here with, we’ve had good weather. Working with a good contractor. Scharfenberg: And Todd will we do like a grand opening this fall? Hoffman: Currently not planned. So if you recall this was a neighborhood that wasn’t completely in love with their park so we’re going to try to put a bow on it and then walk away and see what the reaction is. Scharfenberg: Okay. Hoffman: But if you want to have a grand opening we’ll have one so that’s up. Scharfenberg: Well I thought we’ve had them in the past. Hoffman: We have. Based on a different scenario. Scharfenberg: Right. Beer: There have been some testy neighbors about. Kelly: You should put the bow right next to that port-a-potty. Beer: Yeah. So that’s kind of the brief snapshot of Manchester. I don’t know if you guys have any questions I’d be more than happy to answer them. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 12 Hoffman: It’s going to be a beautiful site when they walk down that street and the shelter’s going to be off to the left there where you see the path and then playground…I think a lot of the neighbors will fall in love with it and certainly support the site. Take it from there. Beer: So moving onto Highway 101 and the Foxwood trail. This is just a diagram that you guys have seen a few times. More than a few times so we’re looking at making a connection from Lyman down to the Foxwood entrance and then from the other Foxwood entrance south down to the tunnel. So this is another site we visited for the joint commission tour. The picture on the left is at the end of Mr. Blanski’s driveway which is his house is up to the right of those trees there. That was a before shot and this is about the same location. Maybe a little bit further down of what it looks like today. That was actually this morning so the grade stakes are set. Both the walls are in there. The walls are into the north of the entrance to Foxwoods. So basically at this point there’s final grading that has to take place. The base material for under the trail needs to go in. The handrail for the top of both of those walls have been ordered and are just awaiting delivery. I talked to the developer this morning and Bill Coffman and it’s now escaping me. The contractor that’s going to pull the trail. Hoffman: Mueller. Beer: Mueller and Sons. So they’re going to do from down at the bottom of the tunnel there up to the Foxwood entrance and then north all the way to Lyman so there was two different contracts for development going on but to avoid having a cold joint in the middle of a trail, brand new trail the cities worked it out so that they’re going to pull both sections so it’s just going to be one seamless transition so. The block have been put in kind of over the last few weeks and once they’re all up they need 28 days to cure before they can be stained or painted which then they’ll match the block on the other side of 101 so that’s kind of a quick snapshot of where we’re at with the construction. Here’s a couple more pictures if you look at the two on the left. That’s at the bottom of the trail looking back up towards where we just were. That’s a before and at the bottom there is another picture looking back up so you can see a pretty significant change. And up on the top is along 101 going north towards Lyman and what it looks like today so everything is pretty much ready. The walls are all in. We’re waiting on basically just getting rock and letting the walls cure so. Scharfenberg: So they’re going to be stained that brown color? Beer: Yep. Scharfenberg: Okay. Beer: Yep, yep correct. You can see on the top left there is what they’ll look like. Scharfenberg: Yep. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 13 Hoffman: And the top left, all that wall that you see with the fence on top of it, that’s been all taken out. That’s where the trail now goes. Beer: Yep so if you look down, oops sorry. Wrong way. I basically took the picture, the stop sign is removed on the right picture and that’s just looking back up the hill so. Echternacht: Adam on the bottom right is there going to be a fence or something between the trail and 101? Beer: There is not. Hoffman: Guardrail in certain sections. Beer: Yeah. Hoffman: Where the trail gets too close to 101 there’s a guardrail. Other than that it will just be that grass median. Beer: Yep, so again if you look on the right picture at the top closest to 101, that guardrail section was added there so there will be, probably there will be something similar in certain areas. Hoffman: Going north… Beer: Going north. Hoffman: Guardrails as the trail gets closer to 101. The trail was pinched down by that wetland that’s in the big dip and that’s where the trail got tighter to 101 and then there’s a guardrail in this section. So the destination to the north is the stop sign and the stop light at Lyman and 101 so that everybody can get across…and then south obviously the value of the underpass is currently there and you want to make, utilize that and give access to that so… Beer: So unlike the project at Manchester this project has been just plagued with horrible weather. I think they started June 1st with their excavation and I mean what did they say? The first 5 weeks they were working 2 to 3 days a week at best case scenario so they’re really starting to make the turn now and over the last, when they started being able to work a full week they were really making headway so, definitely turned the corner on both projects and just looking to drive them home. Scharfenberg: Any questions for Adam? Thank you Adam. Beer: Yep. Park and Recreation Commission – August 28, 2018 14 COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS. None. COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET. Scharfenberg: Anybody have any questions on the administrative packet? Any comments Todd? Kelly: Todd on the administrative packet the, is that land is now considered part of Shorewood. It doesn’t exist in Chanhassen anymore. Did we transfer the land or did we? Hoffman: The land is in Shorewood. It’s no longer in Chanhassen. Kelly: Okay, so that’s a complete transfer. Thank you. Scharfenberg: Alright, no other items to cover. I will entertain a motion for adjournment. Kelly moved, Echternacht seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned 8:10 p.m. Submitted by Todd Hoffman Park and Rec Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated September 4, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.3. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Planning Commission minutes dated September 4, 2018.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Summary Minutes dated September 4, 2018 Planning Commission Verbatim Minutes dated September 4, 2018 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 2018 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, Mark Randall, and Michael McGonagill MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Weick STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Michael Clauson 8381 West Lake Drive PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN RETAIL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE ON THE TARGET BUILDING. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Madsen asked for clarification of the sign ordinance in the Central Business District. Chairman Aller asked Leyla Bungee with Kimley-Horn and Associates and Jay Richardson with RSP Architects to explain how they came up with the design before opening the public hearing. Michael Clausen, 8381 West Lake Drive and business owner in Chanhassen explained how they were told they could only have 2 signs for their business. Chairman Aller closed the public hearing. After discussion by commission members the following motion was made. Undestad moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. 7644 SOUTH SHORE DRIVE: CONSIDER A VARIANCE TO INSTALL BOULDER WALL AND PATIO IN BLUFF SETBACK AREA. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Madsen asked about the stepper pavers. Commissioner Undestad asked about the drainage swales. Chairman Aller asked about the patio area that was previously disturbed. Commissioner Tietz asked about the Planning Commission Summary – September 4, 2018 2 direction of a downspout. The applicant, Matt Arens thanked city staff for their willingness to work with them, clarified their proposal for the patio and the design of the house addition. Tyler Wortz with Magnolia Landscaping and Design Company addressed the issues of using permeable flagstone pavers for the patio, retaining walls, and installation of the flagstone steppers. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. Curt Robinson, 202 West 77th Street stated that Mr. Arens has always kept his property neat and his belief that he will continue to do so. Chairman Aller closed the public hearing. After discussion and comments the following motion was made. Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance for the construction of a boulder wall and flagstone stepper path within the bluff setback and impact zone, and the construction of a flagstone patio within the bluff setback and impact zone with pervious pavers subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decisions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit. 2. The survey should be updated and provided as part of the zoning permit application showing: a) the top of the bluff; b) 20-foot bluff impact zone; c) 30-foot bluff setback; d) proposed lot coverage; e) 15” storm pipe and the drainage and utility easement located over the pipe; f) scenic preservation/conservation easement; and, g) all proposed improvements. 3. Stairways and flagstone stepper walkways within the bluff setback zone may not exceed 4 feet in width. 4. There shall be a minimum of six inches of separation between the flagstones that comprise the flagstone paths and walkways. 5. The location and dimensions of the boulder wall and flagstone pathways shall substantially conform to those depicted in Exhibit A. 6. All exposed soil within the grading limits must either be covered with vegetation or, in areas where vegetation will not grow, a double-shredded hardwood mulch. 7. Soil infiltration improvements, either adding compost or air spading, shall be conducted within the project’s grading limits. 8. The proposed retaining wall on the east side of the property is within the drainage and utility easement. It should not be constructed over the pipe or infringe on the easement. 9. The existing retaining wall on the east side of the property is located within a drainage and utility easement and an encroachment agreement should be obtained and recorded for the wall. 10. Zoning permits are required for all proposed retaining walls under four feet in height and building permits are required for any proposed retaining wall over four feet in height. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Madsen noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated August 7, 2018 as presented. Planning Commission Summary – September 4, 2018 3 COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Bob Generous presented an update on the Control Concepts site plan which has been tabled to the October 22, 2018 City Council meeting and discussed upcoming Planning Commission agenda items. Undestad moved, Randall seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 4, 2018 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Mark Undestad, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, Mark Randall, and Michael McGonagill MEMBERS ABSENT: Steve Weick STAFF PRESENT: Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Michael Clauson 8381 West Lake Drive PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO CHANHASSEN RETAIL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE ON THE TARGET BUILDING. Walters: Item 1 is Planning Case 2018-15. It is a requested amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development. So Target Corporation has requested that the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD be amended to allow signage along 3 elevations. So just so people know what we’re talking about when we say the Chanhassen Retail Center. It is an 18.69 acre planned unit development in red here in downtown Chanhassen. The anchor tenant is the Target and the planned unit development has unique sign standards which differ from the general city’s code and they limit businesses within that development to signage along 2 street frontages with a maximum of 15 percent wall area. So if we look at just the existing Target building they currently have signage along the western elevation. This is a visual of the elevation as it stands after their recent remodel. They also have signage along the southern elevation and what they would like to do is place a sign along the northern elevation to help raise awareness and advertise the new liquor store that’s been added to the building. So in evaluating this request staff did a little bit of research. First thing we did was we looked at the Chanhassen Retail Center and it’s wall signage. We went through the different businesses. We found that the building that hosts the Noodles and Company and the Jersey Mike’s Sub has signage along 3 elevations. This is consistent with the district because it’s inhabited by two different businesses so each business only has signage on 2 facades. We also found that the Perkins has signage along 3 elevations, north, east and west. Staff believes this was the result of a permitting error. So we then also looked at the different elevations and as the development currently stands there is already signage along every cardinal direction, north, south, east and west. We looked at how different sign plans and planned unit developments had handled sign elevations and street frontages. We Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 2 found the most common were either limiting it to 2 frontages. We had 11 of 29 that did that or allowing one per street frontage which is the base standard of the city code. 15 did that. So the request to have signage on additional frontage would not be out of line with how other developments and multi-tenant buildings have been treated in the city. Staff also then, well you can see we also then compared everything to the city code and what it would be if it was just handled by the city ordinance versus the PUD. In general the Chanhassen Retail Center is more restrictive on the number of frontages. More liberal on the amount of building area that can be covered by signage. Due to the fact that there are existing buildings within the Chanhassen Retail Center that has signage along 3 frontages and that this is a pretty typical situation a lot of different developments within the city, staff recommends that the provision limiting Chanhassen Retail Center to 2 street frontages be removed. This would allow the development to be governed by the city ordinance in terms of determining which street elevations are allow to have signage. With that I’d be happy to take any questions. Aller: When you say that the, by shifting that, pulling it out of the PUD that one term to make it 2 frontages as opposed to 1 that it will automatically go by city code. Would it be better if we just change the PUD to state that it will go by city code or is that going to impact anyone else? Walters: We could. Aller: I mean is that our desired impact? Walters: Our desire is not to remove all unique provisions governing signage within the planned unit development. The goal was just to, from our perspective to remove the more restrictive street frontage and then to allow the rest of the provisions to stand. The PUD also has you know this is a, outside of wall signage but it specifies one monument sign per property which is different than city code standards and limits the development to one pylon sign. Again under general city code each property would be allow it’s own pylon sign so our goal was to make the smallest possible change that would, well and remove the non-conformity within the Perkins restaurant. Clear up any potential ambiguity about the multi-tenant building that has signage on 3 frontages and accommodate Target’s request. Which we felt was reasonable when we looked at the changes to the building. Advertising needs and how similar developments had been treated throughout the city. Aller: So this modification isn’t going to cause one of the other businesses if they want to change their signage to increase it? Walters: It would allow every building within the PUD to have one sign per street façade so the Perkins for instance would be allowed to have 3. I believe several of the other buildings also have street frontages along 3 elevations and would, if they wanted to be entitled to add a sign along that as well. We do have one PUD in the city where we have unique provisions for the anchor tenant which allow them to have signage on 3 elevations but restrict other businesses Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 3 within that development to have signage on only 2 so it wouldn’t be unprecedented if the Planning Commission preferred to limit this to Target only. Aller: Thank you. Any further questions or questions based on that? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I would just like to clarify how many signs a business could have in the central business district. If that Chapter 20 that’s quoted in our cover sheet, so it’s one sign per street frontage, is that correct? So currently a business that might not be located in the PUD could have a sign on 3 sides? Walters: That is correct. And an example, well I’m trying to think of, oh. No Lunds only has 2 frontages so they’re limited to 2. Off the top of my head I’m not thinking of one that I know for sure is zoned CBD rather than PUD within the central business district but yes, that is the base standard of the code. Madsen: But so a business, if it was on 3 frontages in the central business district could also have as many signs as this PUD area. Walters: They could have signage on each elevation yeah could be treated the same. Madsen: Each elevation, yep. Walters: Yep. Madsen: Just so that it’s fair throughout that area. Okay thank you. Aller: Based on that any additional questions? Hearing none we’ll have the applicant make their presentation if they’d like to do so. If you could come up and state your name and your representational capacity. Leyla Bungee: Good evening, my name is Leyla Bungee with Kimley-Horn and Associates. We submitted this application on behalf of Target to add the additional Wine and Spirits sign on the north elevation as part of the recent remodel as MacKenzie had stated. Jay Richardson: Yes, hi I’m Jay Richardson. I’m with RSP Architects and we’ve done the design of the exterior of the building. And coordinated the signs with the sigh company. Aller: Welcome. So could you explain how it’s a coordinated effort on those signs, what the impact would be on the frontage and why you’ve come up with this particular sign scheme. Leyla Bungee: Yeah I can start it. Jay Richardson: Okay go ahead. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 4 Leyla Bungee: So we have been doing a lot of back and forth with planning staff just to make sure that we’re meeting all the requirements currently of the PUD. The wine and spirits addition in the store that was something that came a little bit later after our initial meetings to discuss the signage plan and so once the design had gotten to a point where we wanted to keep the main Target sign the size that it is on the building today, that didn’t leave that much room on the front for the wine and spirit sign to go on the front which I believe is the west elevation so part of that reason was to move it to the north elevation to accommodate the current allowances for sign area. So right now there is a window decal on that new entrance for the wine and spirit sign but Target realized that they haven’t been seeing as many customers as they were hoping with that new liquor store service so adding the new wine and spirit sign on the, yeah I guess the left hand of the building facing the main street that helps advertise that service to people that might not know it’s there today. Aller: Any questions? Additional questions? Thank you very much. Leyla Bungee: Thank you. Aller: At this time I’ll open up the public hearing portion of the item. Any individual present may come forward and speak either for or against the item before us. Welcome sir. If you could state your name and address for the record that would be great. Michael Clausen: Hello. Michael Clausen, 8381 West Lake Drive in Chanhassen here. Local business owner. We opened our business 5 years ago and we have, I have 3 sides to my building so when I wanted signage on all 3 sides went to you know, I did not put in a formal request or whatever. I just talked to my friend Sharmeen. Said you know what’s the deal here and she said well you’re only allowed 2 signage on 2 sides of your business. It had nothing to do with the building as I understand it’s each business is allowed 2 sides because I could have, I could have put signage on the south side of my business and the east side of my business. The other businesses, tenants in the shop could have still had their signage so we could add signs on all 4 of them but any individual business can only have signage on 2 sides. That’s how it was stated to me and I’m pretty sure that’s how the city code goes. That’s how, that’s why most of these places only have signage on 2 sides so, and now to come along and you know after the fact and you know probably the reason they’re not doing well is we’ve over developed retail liquor in this city so now we’re trying to figure out ways to accommodate it so we want to change the rules to allow people to you know do something different when the rest of us have all been playing by the rules that were set out for years so. You know I guess I just think in the sense of fairness and what’s right you know they should act under the, they should be subject to the same rules as everyone else in town and to do it after the fact is unfair to the other businesses. You know to say that now I can well you go ahead and put it on 3 sides. Well that ship has already sailed and that’s not in our budget to add a $10,000 sign to the side of the building so that’s my thoughts on, if you have any questions or anything. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 5 Aller: Thank you. Anyone else wishing to come forward to speak either for or against the item? Seeing no one come forward I’ll close the public hearing on this matter and open it up for questions. Additional questions of staff or comments or action. Yes Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I’m wondering if staff could address that if that business does have the 3 frontages if they could have had the 3 signs or are they in a different business district or what the difference was? Walters: So without knowing a little bit more it’s hard for me to comment. You know if we go back to our sheet if the business’s zoning is planned unit development it, you know we do have 11 different planned unit developments and sign plans in the city that do restrict businesses to 2 elevations. If the gentleman’s business is located in one of those he would have been you know informed that that was the limit. Under base code it is one per street frontage. It is, again without knowing the location it is possible the gentleman’s business only has frontage along 2 elevations. There are other instances where because there’s a residential development nearby we restrict elevations in the PUD and things like that. So that would be my response to that. Mr. Generous? Generous: And the one other thing I would add is that part of a site plan review there could be a limitation imposed on the development to limit the number of signs they have irregardless of what the city ordinance is so. Aller: Okay. Did that answer your question? Do you have a follow up question? Madsen: Well I guess we don’t know the exact circumstances. I just would be concerned about the fairness of, you know if people are told how many signs they can have that after the fact adding more, you know just want it to be fair for all the businesses in the city. Aller: Any additional comments or I’ll entertain a motion. Undestad: I will make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Undestad. Undestad: That the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development amendment 2018-15 and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Randall: Second. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 6 Aller: I have a motion and a valid second. Any further discussion? I think to Commissioner Madsen’s point we want to be consistent and fair as much as possible throughout the city with all of our zoning and ordinances. In this particular situation we are dealing with a PUD which is a separate zoning in and of itself that’s created for this particular area of property and there were exchanges made in order to achieve that with regard to signage and square footage and that whole process so I kind of look at, and that was the impact of my questioning was I wanted to see whether anyone else within the PUD was going to be impacted so I’m, I’m more concerned with maybe tailoring it to allow for Target to be the only one that gets it at this point in time to determine on a case by case basis whether or not it should be expanded. I don’t know what you opinions would be on that. McGonagill: I was kind of similar thinking Mr. Chairman. Just limit it to Target and take it from there. Aller: Would that be, is that fair to the others that? Undestad: That’d be my feeling is we’re talking about the PUD and the other tenants, the other buildings involved in that were part of that same PUD and, you know I understand the other businesses, you know each case is handled that way but I think if we’re dealing with the whole PUD we ought to look at the whole PUD that way. McGonagill: So it’d be as the PUD is written here. Aller: Yeah that would be my concern is, I want to overall be consistent but at the same time I don’t want to have an impact which is going to create hostility either amongst the tenants or amongst the citizens who all of a sudden have too much signage. Madsen: Yeah. Aller: Any additional thoughts? Randall: Well there are a few in there that already have the, that have more than they’re supposed to based on that PUD correct? Aller: That are non-conforming. Randall: Non-conforming so by us altering the PUD it would bring everyone up to the right level. That would be in conforming. Madsen: My understanding was it was just the Perkins that is on the 3 different frontages and it was in error and the other building, those businesses only have it on 2 frontages each which happens to them because of the 2 tenants happens to be. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 7 Randall: Yep they can only do the 2 yeah. Madsen: The 4 so really no one else is really approved for it. Randall: Okay. Aller: Okay. Any additional discussion? Madsen: I guess I’m just concerned that you know I don’t know if they have to have the sign. I think everyone knows Target’s there. They’ve seen the development and it, you know the other businesses are following that rule so I’m just not really sure what the need is to have an additional sign. Aller: Well I can certainly understand their desire for the additional signage because the usage of that Target was always with a certain expectation of the items that were sold in there. Whether it be coffee or appliances or food or, but this was a separate escalated purpose that has been separated out and they’ve created that and the City has allowed for that liquor license to be placed in there so I think it’s almost like a different use that’s unexpected so I can understand where they would want and their desire certainly would be there for it. I just don’t want it to impact the community standards that we’re placing out there for purposes of signage in general. Tietz: Chairman Aller? Wasn’t too many months ago that we had a variance I think to allow a pylon sign in the parking lot and what does that constitute? Is that another sign because it’s, it was a variance that was requested at that time. That’s what, back in February or March. It was for parking for. Aller: I think it was a height variance wasn’t it? Tietz: Well it was a height but it was, it’s a sign. Walters: If I’m recollecting it was for the pick up area within the parking lot. Tietz: Right. Walters: Those, it was a code change to the city code and that was adding another category of directional signage that could be allowed businesses without a permit so under the pre-existing city code we had allowed any business to have up to 4 directional signs. Maximum 5 feet in height. 4 feet in, 4 square feet display area and we added another category allowing certain types of uses. Grocery stores. Big box retailers to have a pick up sign designating an area for remote, basically just you know stopping by and having goods put in the car in the parking lot. Tietz: Right. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 8 Walters: And that had unique standards. Tietz: I think that one was 10 or 12 feet. It’s not a 5 or 6 foot sign. It’s a. Walters: My recollection is 12 or 13 feet. Tietz: It was significant I remember because we had some discussion about it’s height and location. Aller: Right. Undestad: Well and that I think that signage for the pick up area part of that shows how retail is changing. Businesses are changing. They need to change with it and this is part of it I think when they have to put a new, the liquor store in there. We never had one, we never had drive up, pick up your groceries you know and so I think, and again to keep it in the full PUD package out there I think that’s the way it should be put in there. Aller: And just to follow up on that a little bit. We also discussed the fact that there will not be drive up pick up of alcohol. Undestad: Right. Aller: Any additional comments? Questions? Concerns? Otherwise I have a motion and a second. Undestad moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: Motion carries and we move onto item number 2. Thank you very much. 7644 SOUTH SHORE DRIVE: CONSIDER A VARIANCE TO INSTALL BOULDER WALL AND PATIO IN BLUFF SETBACK AREA. Walters: Alright item number 2 is Planning Case 2018-16. A variance for 7644 South Shore Drive. This item will go before, if appealed will go before the City Council on September 24th. It is a variance to place a boulder wall, a flagstone stepper path and a patio within the bluff setback and impact zone for 7644 South Shore Drive. So the property is, let me get my little laser pointer here. Is zoned planned unit development residential. In this PUD lots are required to have 11,700 square feet. They have a 30 foot front yard setback. 10 foot side yard setback. Are limited to 25 percent lot coverage within the shoreland overlay district and then for Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 9 properties located on a bluff such as the property in question there’s a 30 foot bluff setback or 5 feet for structures that exist pre-1991 and then there’s also a 20 foot bluff impact zone which prevents vegetative clearing and removal. Topographical disturbances within 20 feet of the top of the bluff. So the existing condition for the property, it is a 43,604 square foot lot. As of the survey that was approved with the September 29, 2017 building permit for the remodel and addition of the house it had 15.57 percent lot cover. There is a non-conforming 9.8 foot west side yard setback and their house is a non-conforming 20 feet from the top of the bluff and then there is a deck which has a patio underneath and a 3 season porch that are approximately 5 feet from the top of the bluff. Again all these were constructed before the bluff district was extended into this area so they are all legal non-conforming’s. The property also has numerous non- conforming retaining walls east of the house within the bluff but it meets other standards for it’s district. The applicant is proposing adding a boulder wall here. It would be between, primarily between 1 and 1 ½ feet in height. Potentially a little taller in this section by the 3 season porch as determined by the grades. They’re also proposing adding a stepper pathway. I believe it’s 18, approximately 18 inch in diameter steppers to 30 inch in diameter steppers and then they’re proposing to space them to allow for some infiltration between them. The purpose of this would be to allow safe transit of the back yard. The area in gray here is the area that would require the variance for that. They’re also proposing putting in a flagstone patio and seating area that is within the bluff setback area. The boulder retaining wall, their goal with it is to help prevent the migration of landscaping materials down the bluff during rain and also to provide some support for the top of the bluff up here. The flagstone as I mentioned would be safe transit through the rear yard. The patio, the applicant has stated that this area was previously covered by impervious surface from a pre-existing driveway and that the area has already been disturbed. In sum when you look over the landscaping plan it has been very thoughtfully designed to try to minimize the amount of impervious surface generated and try to protect the bluff. And the location of the home as we mentioned does pre-date the bluff protection ordinance and there is similar landscaping near the tops of the bluffs in the properties surrounding this one. When staff looked at it staff agrees that the flagstone stepper patio is needed to provide safe transit through the rear yard. Staff has walked the site. There is a, it drops off fairly quick and it you know due to the shade, etcetera it’s very hard to get vegetation to grow there. The applicant’s concern about it being slippery when wet certainly seems like it’d be substantial. The bluff protection ordinance does make allowances for paths to be located near and through bluffs to provide safe transit and we believe this is in line with the intent of that part of the ordinance. Staff’s review of the boulder assessment wall is that it will not negatively impact the bluff. The area has been previously disturbed. It will likely help prevent the migration of materials down slope although it’s a fairly minimal wall so it’s not expected to serve a major retaining function or anything like that. Regarding the front yard patio, staff feels that there are potential alternative locations where it could be placed. Staff also notes that the property has an existing rear yard deck and patio. A front stoop that could be extended to provide additional seating and ultimately does not feel the patio’s location meets the practical difficulties standards required for issuing a variance. Staff believes reasonable use can be gotten for the property without creating additional impervious surface within the bluff setback for that patio. Staff has worked pretty closely with the applicant at every phase of this project. They have routinely taken staff’s suggestions and Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 10 you know removed features that we felt were problematic and so we’d just like to point out that they have worked very, very hard to try to protect the bluff. Beyond that I would be happy to take any questions you may have. Aller: Any questions at this time? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: When they add the stepper pavers will they need to bring in additional fill to smooth that out so that they’re flat to be able to use them or will they be able to do that without bringing in additional fill? Walters: My understanding from reading what the landscaper submitted was that their plan is just to basically set them in grade and not alter the grade. However I believe I see the landscaper in the audience so I’ll allow him to clarify that during their presentation. Madsen: Okay thank you. Aller: Commissioner Undestad. Undestad: The, all the drainage swales around the house on there, are those all required? Walters: No. That’s one of the things I was mentioning is they have gone above and beyond what we would typically expect of a residential homeowner in terms of trying to manage the water generated by it. They worked quite a bit with the Water Resources Coordinator to come up with this plan. I think this is the third or maybe even fourth iteration I’ve seen of it in terms of getting to the drainage swales designed and vegetated in a way that would be effective for the property. Undestad: Okay thank you. Aller: I’ll just add another question on the patio. Where it was disturbed before. Was it verified their property had been disturbed? There was hard cover on that location? Walters: So I took a couple avenues to look at that. I looked at, as near as I can tell the driveway was reconfigured a little bit after 2012. I looked at a pre 2012 survey and measured back based on the location of the existing retaining wall. I believe that with the possible exception of a very small edge of the driveway that patio area was not previously covered by surface. It doesn’t mean it wasn’t disturbed by landscaping and other things. I also looked at the 2016 aerial with the, what we call the plan of matrix overlaid which show pre-existing asphalt from I think it was 2006 and then kind of back counted that based on the number of trees I could observe and if you look at my laser pointer what I saw was that the edge of the driveway kind of did this but never came quite as far northeast as the proposed patio. From those two sources it’s my belief that the section of the patio in purple here was not previously covered by asphalt. Again this isn’t to say it wasn’t disturbed by other landscaping. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 11 Aller: And this square footage of hard cover, how does that compare with the square footage that is typically allotted? Walters: The applicant would be, even if the Planning Commission granted all variances they’d be adding approximately another 900 square feet. I believe it puts them at about 17.6 percent out of 25. They would still be well under the theoretical maximum for their district. Aller: Thank you. Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: MacKenzie it looks like on the photos it looks like there’s a downspout that’s being directed directly to the slope. Is that going to be picked up in one of the future holding areas up on top or is that going to, or is that part of the ultimate plan? Walters: I don’t believe that’s the final position. I’ll allow the landscaper to speak to that. My understanding from discussions with Vanessa and them was that the intent was that there not be channelizing, certainly nothing pointing you know towards the bluff. But I’ll allow them to clarify. Tietz: Okay, thanks. Aller: Any additional questions of staff? Hearing none if the applicant would like to come forward that would be great. Those who are appearing in a representational capacity please state that capacity when they are going to speak and we’d love your names and addresses for the record. Matt Arens: Hi, Matt Arens at the address 7644 South Shore Drive. My wife Amanda Arens and then Tyler Wortz who can answer any of the technical questions because I’m sure I won’t know the answer to them. So I won’t spend a lot of time going over the two proposals that the, parts of the proposal that the staff had recommended. I would echo that we are incredibly grateful for the staff’s willingness to work with us. They made some suggestions that I think we were happy to take and I think actually improved the plan quite a bit so we’re grateful for their efforts on that. I think the one thing, I think the point of contention here with the patio, I went back and read our, I was surprised when the staff suggested that it not be approved. I went back and I read our proposal and after I read it quite frankly I thought I don’t think I’d approve it either. The way that we wrote it. We did not make a very good case for it and I will tell you the reason for that is I was so focused on the other two aspects of the plan and if you go back and read it that’s where I really, that’s where I really focused so maybe just a couple things that I would add to why we’re hoping that you would consider this. I think just a factual correction on my part. I don’t disagree with the assessment that the old driveway probably didn’t go into that 30 foot setback. I think it overlapped with part of where the patio is proposed but as I went and looked and it’s really hard to tell, if I could say definitively it was in that area I would tell you. I’m just not sure so that very well could be correct and it may not have applicability there so I Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 12 wanted to correct that because I think we stated specifically that it did go into that, into that area so that’s one point that I would certainly agree with. I could have done this a lot differently. What happened, a little bit of the history here that would have made this easier is we really enjoy this partnership with the staff because we bought this property and as you can tell, I mean this house is kind of dropped right on the edge there. We didn’t build it. We would have done a lot of things differently and we knew we were kind of taking on a headache when we bought it. My wife and I were, didn’t have kids at the time. We did a lot of the landscaping ourselves and we did a lot of things that we think really improved the property. Made a lot more friendly towards the lake. I put a lot of that in the report. I won’t repeat all of it. But one of the things that we did was we had a great partnership with the water resource expert for the city and Ms. Strong now but prior to that Mr. Jeffery and he came out and when we were doing things we would ask him if he’s come out and he was always very helpful in doing that. We had some work that we were doing and we told him we’re contemplating a remodel and an addition to the existing house and the initial plan, and you can see it from the pictures. I’m looking at page 8 on the report and I don’t know if it’s easier to see up here but on page 8 it’s got the overlay of the old, the circle driveway and then it’s got the new proposal where it shows the area in the bluff zone. So this is something that I really wish I would have emphasized in making our case because I think it’s critical and hopefully it will make a difference. Our initial plan for the house, if you look back just inside that 20 foot bluff impact zone across the back of the property, more in the area where the smaller retaining wall is being proposed, our initial plan extended the house along that same line so the code is, allows on parcels of land where a building has already been constructed. The setback from the top of the bluff is 5 feet or the existing setback whichever is more for additions onto existing buildings so we could have extended the existing line all the way to the 10 foot setback and that was our initial plan. That was where we were going to add onto the house. Mr. Jeffery said I know you can do that but I would rather you didn’t. If you could change your plan to try to extend the house forward more towards the cul-de-sac that would have less of an impact and we’d really like for you to consider that and so we did. We actually had, we had the house drawn up. It was already to go on that initial plan that would have extended it along that area and we drew up new plans and really tried to find something that had less of an impact and what I wish I would have done, again I feel like you learn this stuff as you go through the process so by the time you figure it out you’re done with it and you’ve done things the way that you did but I wish at the time that we made that design change that I would have come to the staff at that point and said listen do you think this would have much less of an impact if we put this area in the front and change the design and I’ll get to why that’s more important than it might look on a piece of paper in a moment but, so that change was made and we took basically the addition and we pushed it out in front of the house. So if you drive by the property, and we’ve got one of my neighbors here who walks by frequently, what you’ll see is that new area where you can see the difference between the old house and the new house. It’s all garage so when you come into the house you just see this big garage and it’s quite frankly it’s not aesthetically great. So one of the things that we talked to with the landscaper was can you shift some of the attention away from this so it’s aesthetically, it’s got more curb appeal because it’s kind of a design flaw and the other thing that we talked about, and respectfully I don’t disagree with the staff. You know you can see there’s a little front stoop where you could sit but if you sit on that stoop you have to imagine Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 13 the wall of the new garage runs this way so if you look at here, you can see. You can’t even really, you can’t see the driveway from where you’re sitting there so it’s, we’ve got a 5 year old and a 7 year old child. You know they play in the driveway a lot and as you can see from the back yard from the pictures that property falls right off. I mean there’s no area for them to play and I don’t want to insult you folks by saying it’s going to be the end of the world if we don’t have a little area to sit there in the front but essentially the alternative is it’s pulling lawn chairs out and sitting in the driveway which is doable but you know there’s, this sitting area is more important I guess than it would look like on paper so one, it’s to try to as you come up to the house to try to turn the viewer’s eye and create a sitting area and a little bit of an interest but more importantly it gives you an area where you can sit and you can see from the viewpoint you can see the driveway and the kids riding their bikes and different things like that which someday we won’t need but for the next several years I think is really an important feature. I think one thing that I would point out that’s not part of the plan, and again I think this is because I was so focused on the other two items, we can make this material permeable. That’s correct isn’t it? Tyler Wortz: Yes. Matt Arens: So if that’s helpful we’re more than happy to do that. And I will tell you the other thing is the alternative is if we don’t do it in this area I think our only option would probably be to take out a couple of the mature trees that we planted 10 years ago and I would really rather not do that. I mean it’s doable but it’s certainly not optimal in my mind so I think there’s some tweaks that we can make to it that would make that a little more important. Again I apologize. There’s a different way we could have went about this which I think would have made our case stronger than we’ve made it but that’s, those are kind of some thoughts that I wanted to put forward on that aspect and I’m happy to answer any questions on that or the other parts of the plan as well. Aller: Any questions at this point of the applicant? I just have some questions for the landscaper. Otherwise thank you sir. So let’s talk about the permeability. Tyler Wortz: Yes. Aller: What’s that option? Your vision to be… Tyler Wortz: With the flagstone patio we could make it a permeable flagstone where the joints are free draining into our free draining base which then can infiltrate into the ground water. The more traditional way is to fill those joints with a poly metric sand that hardens and so then we’re sheeting water off of it but we could definitely turn it into a permeable system that allows it into the ground water without the sheeting. Aller: And the retaining walls. Could you talk about the retaining walls and what that would do to protect the lake? Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 14 Tyler Wortz: So the row of boulders in the back or the small retaining wall is, you know fieldstone boulders ranging in size from you know on the small end 12 to 18 inch diameter boulders. Probably on the upper end 25 to 28 inch boulders. Installed with not much disturbance to what’s already there. As you see in the pictures there’s a pretty clear defined drop off between the currently disturbed soils and then the fescue on the bluff. So what we’re looking for is just a defined separation between those two areas and to help us keep mulch and landscape materials from ending up on that beautiful fescue and slowing down water. One thing that we talked with Vanessa Strong quite a bit about is you know dispersing and slowing the rain water and so the intent isn’t to hold the rain water. That’s actually one of the original drafts of the plan was having rain gardens on top of the boulder wall and you know maybe a learning point on my end was working with Vanessa on how that’s not necessarily what we want at the top of a bluff and so, so we moved those swales into other portions of the property where we want water to soak in and that back boulder wall is just slowing the water. Matt Arens: If I could just one point to add to that. Aller: Yes. Matt Arens: Just a little history. So when we moved into this property there was a lot of just scrubby volunteers on that back area and so it was dirt transitioning to more dirt and one of the things I wish I would have done differently is I wish I would have videotaped when we’d get a hard rain because mud would wash right down the hill and into the lake and I think I mentioned that in the report. We have tried, so we planted, we planted, we got a recommendation and the City has been really complimentary of how this low growth fescue has gone in. It’s, you know it’s got a deep root system. It holds that hill incredibly well. The problem is you get the flatter area and then you get it to transition so we’ve tried putting mulch in there. It washes down the hill. We’ve tried putting all sorts of things and it’s just, we haven’t been able to find anything. And then the other thing is, there are certain areas where, I mean the old house and I think somebody had a question about where the rain water from the spouts went. There was a spout that came down and drained and it had some velocity and it dropped quite a bit and that area would wash out 3-4 feet and so we’d go and we’d try to smooth it over and we’d try to keep that bluff line kind of intact and so part of this is to, it’s not to build something up. It’s not to do anything. It’s just to anchor that so then we can have, and again this was, I give all the credit to the staff on this. We were going to put you know a yard surface in there and they said if you can do stepper stones that would give you what you’re looking for and to have that and to transition to that really effective fescue we think, we think makes a lot of sense. McGonagill: So then, if I can ask a question. That drain pipe will stop before the boulder wall and just distribute above the boulder wall? The one that was in the photo. Tyler Wortz: Yeah the drain pipes that you see in the photo are all temporary. We wouldn’t allow any of them to be running that closely to the bluff. That’s where all the vegetative swales on the plan throughout the property come into play. We’d be routing them more towards the Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 15 front where they can slow and disperse but we would not want any point sources of water aimed directly at the bluff like that. Aller: And then if you could just comment quickly on the flagstone. Tyler Wortz: The flagstone steppers. Yes to your question on, no we wouldn’t be bringing in any fill to install those. We’d be working on the native grade and just you know minor hand working to level them and set them into place but we’re not going to do any major disturbance to the existing grade and soil. Madsen: Thank you. Tyler Wortz: Yes. Aller: Additional questions at this time? Okay thank you very much. Tyler Wortz: Thank you. Aller: At this point in time I’ll open up the public hearing portion of this item. Any individuals wishing to speak for or against the item can do so at this time. Welcome sir. If you could state your name and address for the record that would be great. Curt Robinson: My name is Curt Robinson. I live at 202 West 77th Street. I really haven’t seen the property. I don’t really know all the technical issues you’re talking about. I take my grandson down fishing next door and I can tell you that Mr. Arens always keeps the property neat and I’m sure he will continue to do so. Thank you. Aller: Thank you sir. Any other individuals wishing to come forward at this time can do so. Seeing no one come forward I will close the public hearing portion of this item and open it up for discussion. Any bones, primarily my concern was going to be the patio and not necessarily because I don’t find it to be a reasonable use but because of the potential water issues and the hard cover issues but I think they’re resolved by the amount of the hard cover not exceeding about 17.5 percent. The fact that there’s been an offer to potentially do that with pervious pavers as well which is something that I would be in favor of doing and so I would be in favor of any motion which allows for this, these variances to be made with that modification based on the fact that clearly this applicant has made and gone well beyond, above and beyond in protecting the bluff and my concern is with the bluff and the water issues and for the fact that they’ve put in the swales. That they’re going to reduce the rate of the water flowing into the lake. That they’re protecting the slope which protects again the lake from having other sediments and particulates go into the lake. And the fact that I think everything has been the safety factor as well as the impact of having those pavers put in for the walkway and economically as well as environmentally. I just think that it’s a good thing for us to approve at this point in time. Commissioner Tietz. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 16 Tietz: Chairman Aller. It’s an excellent example of citizens working with the staff and staff being very cooperative and offering suggestions and obviously the land owner has taken those suggestions to heart and worked with their landscape architect to come up with a reasonable plan. It’s a difficult site. This is looking at the photos and looking at the survey and the terrain it’s, I’m sure it’s been a challenge for all these years to work on it but it looks like you’ve come to a good solution and a good process. Aller: Additional comments, questions or concerns? I’ll entertain a motion. Madsen: So this would include the patio? Aller: We would need to make a modification. McGonagill: Yeah that’s what I was thinking. We’d have to modify this. Walters: All you would need to do if I may is just omit the denies and just so approve the variance for the construction of boulder wall, flagstone patio and flagstone stepper path and then add the condition that the flagstone patio be pervious pavers. And then I would alter the variance document in Findings accordingly. Madsen: Let me give it a stab. The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance for the construction of a boulder wall and flagstone stepper path, and the construction of a flagstone patio with pervious pavers subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decisions. Is that right? Tietz: Very nice. Aller: Sounds right. McGonagill: Well done. Randall: I’ll second that. Aller: Having a motion and a second, any further discussion? Tietz: Just a clarification. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: It’s references pervious pavers and I think if you’re using flagstone you’ve got the drainage between the flagstone parcels but are they technically considered pervious pavers? Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 17 Walters: The landscaper will need to work with our Water Resources Coordinator to make sure that the design of the flagstone patio abstracts the first half inch of rain water and meets our specifications but I believe it should be doable and that they can come up with a solution between them. Tietz: I just don’t want somebody to be restricted by the terminology and now have to change the design to accommodate a brick type paver. Is that was, because I immediately jumped to a brick type paver in my mind after all of the discussions we’ve had about pervious pavers so. Just so it’d be clear. Aller: Thank you for that clarification. Well taken. Any further discussion or comment? Hearing none. Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a variance for the construction of a boulder wall and flagstone stepper path within the bluff setback and impact zone, and the construction of a flagstone patio within the bluff setback and impact zone with pervious pavers subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decisions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a zoning permit. 2. The survey should be updated and provided as part of the zoning permit application showing: a) the top of the bluff; b) 20-foot bluff impact zone; c) 30-foot bluff setback; d) proposed lot coverage; e) 15” storm pipe and the drainage and utility easement located over the pipe; f) scenic preservation/conservation easement; and, g) all proposed improvements. 3. Stairways and flagstone stepper walkways within the bluff setback zone may not exceed 4 feet in width. 4. There shall be a minimum of six inches of separation between the flagstones that comprise the flagstone paths and walkways. 5. The location and dimensions of the boulder wall and flagstone pathways shall substantially conform to those depicted in Exhibit A. 6. All exposed soil within the grading limits must either be covered with vegetation or, in areas where vegetation will not grow, a double-shredded hardwood mulch. 7. Soil infiltration improvements, either adding compost or air spading, shall be conducted within the project’s grading limits. 8. The proposed retaining wall on the east side of the property is within the drainage and utility easement. It should not be constructed over the pipe or infringe on the easement. 9. The existing retaining wall on the east side of the property is located within a drainage and utility easement and an encroachment agreement should be obtained and recorded for the wall. 10. Zoning permits are required for all proposed retaining walls under four feet in height and building permits are required for any proposed retaining wall over four feet in height. Chanhassen Planning Commission – September 4, 2018 18 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. Aller: Motion carries. Good luck. Matt Arens: Thank you. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Madsen noted the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated August 7, 2018 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aller: Update on City Council. Generous: Yes, the Control Concepts site plan with variance has been put on hold right now. They’re having cost issues with that and so they’re looking at alternatives and so they’ve actually been, waived our 60 day review and they’re looking at an October 22nd council date. I’ll keep you informed. Our comp plan is on hold also. We’re waiting for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to complete their review of the surface water management portion of it and we missed their deadline for last time so they’re not going to meet til the end of September now so. However we will be, have another work session with council to review the direction that they provided us. There’s some minor changes that they wanted with some of our policies and goals. And the Galpin Property they took comments on that so we’ll see when and if that comes back. Aller: Future dates. Generous: You have one item for your September 18th meeting. That’s 821 Creekwood. It’s a variance for the location of a septic system on a property within the bluff zone so. Aller: Any additional presentations from commissioners? Hearing none I’ll entertain a motion to adjourn. Undestad moved, Randall seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Approve Consultant Contract for Reconditioning the Water Tower at 2999 Water Tower Place Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.4. Prepared By Paul Oehme, Dir. of Public Works/City Engineer File No: PW158E PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council awards a consultant contract for the design and construction inspection services to Badger State Inspection, LLC for the reconditioning of the Water Tower Place water tower in the amount of $110,500." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The water tower located at 2999 Water Tower Place is a steel, 1,500,000 gallon hydropillar tower which was constructed in 1995. The interior and exterior coatings are original. The coatings are now 23 years old and have served the city well having exceeded their expected design life. The bow of the tower is exhibiting flash rusting and the column has rust spots. There are also some minor structural improvements recommended at this time. Staff is recommending the tower be reconditioned in 2019. DISCUSSION The city solicited consultant request for proposals to complete plans and specifications along with construction inspections for the reconditioning of the tower. The city received proposals from SEH, Inc. and Badger State Inspection, LLC.   The fees proposed are as follows: SEH, Inc.                                     $114,800 Badger State Inspection, LLC     $110,500 Staff has reviewed the proposals and recommends entering into a contract with Badger State Inspection, LLC.  Badger State Inspection, LLC included two more weeks of inspections than SEH, Inc.  Badger State Inspection, LLC also included a few more value­added tasks than SEH, Inc.   The Badger State Inspection, LLC proposal included staff that worked on the reconditioning of the Lake Lucy tank in 2016.  Their work on that tank was acceptable.  Badger State Inspection, LLC also completed some of the city's tower cellular installation review and inspection work.  Their work on these projects has been acceptable. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectApprove Consultant Contract for Reconditioning the Water Tower at 2999 Water Tower PlaceSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.4.Prepared By Paul Oehme, Dir. of Public Works/CityEngineer File No: PW158EPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council awards a consultant contract for the design and construction inspection services to Badger StateInspection, LLC for the reconditioning of the Water Tower Place water tower in the amount of $110,500."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe water tower located at 2999 Water Tower Place is a steel, 1,500,000 gallon hydropillar tower which wasconstructed in 1995. The interior and exterior coatings are original. The coatings are now 23 years old and haveserved the city well having exceeded their expected design life. The bow of the tower is exhibiting flash rusting and thecolumn has rust spots. There are also some minor structural improvements recommended at this time. Staff isrecommending the tower be reconditioned in 2019.DISCUSSIONThe city solicited consultant request for proposals to complete plans and specifications along with constructioninspections for the reconditioning of the tower. The city received proposals from SEH, Inc. and Badger StateInspection, LLC.  The fees proposed are as follows:SEH, Inc.                                     $114,800Badger State Inspection, LLC     $110,500Staff has reviewed the proposals and recommends entering into a contract with Badger State Inspection, LLC. Badger State Inspection, LLC included two more weeks of inspections than SEH, Inc.  Badger State Inspection, LLCalso included a few more value­added tasks than SEH, Inc.  The Badger State Inspection, LLC proposal included staff that worked on the reconditioning of the Lake Lucy tank in2016.  Their work on that tank was acceptable.  Badger State Inspection, LLC also completed some of the city's tower cellular installation review and inspection work.  Their work on these projects has been acceptable. The consultant contract work will be contracted on a time and materials basis with a not­to­exceed amount.As with all city engineering contracts, the consultant must submit periodic invoices that staff will review before processing.The consultant will be required to submit time sheets verifying the hours worked on the project and expense sheets.Staff will review the invoices and expense sheets for accuracy and conformance to the contract.The city has the ability to stop the project at any time and is not obligated to pay for work not performed to the city’s satisfaction. SCHEDULE Below is the proposed schedule: Inspection and Feasibility Report Complete October 2, 2018 Complete Contract Documents October 29, 2018 Bid Opening November 22, 2018 Construction Contract Award December 10, 2018 Construction Start June 2019 Construction Substantial Completion October 5, 2019 ATTACHMENTS: Agreement Photos 1 199204v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ________ day of ___________________, 2018, by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and BADGER STATE INSPECTION LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant to provide engineering and inspection services for the 1,500,000 gallon Water Tower Place Water Tower Reconditioning Project. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement; B. Insurance Certificate; C. Consultant’s September 13, 2018 proposal to provide Engineering and Inspections Service for the 1,500,000 Gallon Water Tower Place Water Tower Reconditioning Project, including appendixes (“Proposal”). In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts, with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “C” having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. Consultant shall be paid by the City for the services described based upon its hourly rates in the Proposal, but with a not to exceed fee of: (i) One Hundred Ten Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($110,500.00), (ii) Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) for antenna services to be paid by the antenna providers, (iii) the specified reimbursable expense. The not to exceed fees shall not be adjusted if the estimated hours to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. Consultant shall bill the City as the work progresses. Payment shall be made by the City within thirty-five (35) days of receipt of an invoice. 4. DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 2 199204v1 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8 INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the services provided for herein and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising hereunder. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit Professional Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy on a primary and non- contributory basis. Before commencing work, the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 3 199204v1 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractors for all undisputed services provided by subcontractors within ten (10) days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractors on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractors. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Carver County Minnesota. 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16. RECORDS. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records of hours worked and expenses involved in the performance of services. 4 199204v1 17. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 18. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 20. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall be obligated to the Consultant for payment of amounts due and owing including payment for services performed or furnished to the date and time of termination. Dated: __________________, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: _______________________________ Denny Laufenburger, Mayor BY: ________________________________ Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Dated: __________________, 2018. BADGER STATE INSPECTION LLC BY: _______________________________ Its: ________________________________ Pictures of Rust on Tower CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Key Financial Strategy: Economic Development­Approve Economic Development Guidelines Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.5. Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Manager File No: ADM­076 PROPOSED MOTION The City Council approves the City of Chanhassen Economic Development Guildelines. Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND On May 29, 2018, the current economic development practices and a summary of recent projects were presented to City Council at a work session. City staff discussed tax abatement and tax increment financing examples and programs as options for future economic development programs, as well as a draft of an updated business subsidy criteria policy. City Council directed staff to research policies from neighboring and KFS cities and to present them at a later date. On July 9, 2018 city staff presented economic development or subsidy policy examples from Chaska, Shakopee, Minnetonka, and Elk River, as well as Chanhassen’s previously updated draft policy. City Council discussed whether to update the policy as presented, take requests on a case­by­case basis rather than have a formal policy, or adopt a policy with more specific criteria as to what types of projects would qualify and an outline of what programs could be available to businesses. City Council directed staff to draft a policy with additional evaluation criteria. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached Business Subsidy Guidelines. ATTACHMENTS: Chanhassen DRAFT City Council Work Session Item from May 29, 2018 City of Chanhassen Business Subsidy Guidelines Approved October 11, 1999 Amended April 28, 2003 Amended September 24, 2018 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BUSINESS SUBSIDY GUIDELINES GENERAL PURPOSE Economic development incentives are financial tools that enable the City of Chanhassen to provide opportunities and benefits for its businesses and residents. Incentives can take a variety of forms, including, but not limited to: grants, tax increment financing, tax abatement, and sewer access credits. The City of Chanhassen provides economic development incentives in order to achieve its long-range vision of creating a diverse and sustainable economic base. This is achieved in part through the creation and retention of quality, high paying jobs. A diverse and sustainable economy offers opportunity for improved quality of life for the residents of Chanhassen. Economic development projects may also achieve other worthwhile goals. For instance, some projects provide value to the community in the forms of infrastructure improvements, stabilization of business districts or neighborhoods, or concentration of selected industries. The City of Chanhassen reserves the right to approve or reject subsidies for projects on a case- by-case basis, taking into consideration established policies, project criteria, and demand on City services in relation to the potential benefits from the project. Meeting the guidelines in this document does not guarantee the award of business assistance to the project. Approval or denial of one project is not intended to set precedent for approval or denial of another project. The City of Chanhassen can deviate from these guidelines for projects that supersede the objectives identified herein. Any applicant who is not in good standing with the City, in regards to licenses, fees or other specific charges, will not be considered for business subsidies. OBJECTIVES The City of Chanhassen may consider offering a business subsidy or incentive in order for a project to achieve one or more of the following objectives: • To increase the City’s tax base. • To retain local jobs and/or increase the number and diversity of jobs that offer stable employment and/or attractive wages and benefits. Preference will be given to higher paying jobs that also provide benefits such as health care coverage. • To support projects that provide value in the forms of needed transportation and other utility infrastructure improvements that would be completed in conjunction with the project. • To encourage additional unsubsidized private development in the area, either directly or indirectly through “spin off” development. • To facilitate the development process and to achieve development on sites which would not otherwise be developed but for the use of a business subsidy. • To remove blight and/or encourage redevelopment of commercial and industrial areas that will result in high-quality redevelopment and private reinvestment. 2 • To offset increased costs of redevelopment (i.e. contaminated site clean-up) over and above the costs normally incurred in development. • To create opportunities for a diversification of housing stock available within the community. • To support a project that will improve the quality of life in the City by providing a desirable good or service and addressing an unmet demand in the community. • To contribute to the implementation of other public policies, as adopted by the City from time to time, such as the promotion of energy conservation, and decreasing capital and/or operating costs of local government. • To support the retention and/or adaptive re-use of buildings of historical or architectural significance. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE PROGRAMS The application and subsequent use of these programs is at the discretion of the Chanhassen City Council, and may include additional applications, policies, and procedures. 1) Tax Abatement: The City of Chanhassen is granted the power to utilize tax abatement by the State of Minnesota. The fundamental purpose of tax abatement is to encourage desirable development or redevelopment that would not otherwise occur but for the assistance provided through the tax abatement. The City utilizes “Pay-As-You-Go” Tax Abatement, which relies on the developer to pay for the up-front project costs with reimbursement from tax abatement. 2) Tax Increment Financing: The City of Chanhassen is granted the power to utilize tax increment financing (TIF) by the State of Minnesota. The fundamental purpose of TIF is to encourage desirable development or redevelopment that would not otherwise occur but for the assistance provided through TIF. The City utilizes “Pay-As-You-Go” TIF, which relies on the developer to pay for the up-front project costs with reimbursement from tax increment. 3) MN DEED Programs: There are a variety of programs available through the State of Minnesota DEED division. They include the Job Creation Fund and Minnesota Investment Fund, among others. In order for a business to utilize these programs it is typical for MN DEED to ask for support and cooperation from the city. Chanhassen has worked with MN DEED in the past on projects and would consider the use of these programs in the future on a case-by-case basis. 3 APPLICATION PROCESS 1. The City reserves the right to: a) Request additional information. b) Deny any application. c) Select a third party administrator to assist in the management of the process. 2. Applicant should retain and be assisted by qualified financial consultants and/or underwriters, and legal counsel. 3. Construction of the project shall not be commenced until the City has given preliminary approval to the application for financing. Any advanced planning or construction completed will be done at the sole risk of the applicant. 4. Applicants should complete the appropriate planning application, and include a plans and/or narratives that outline the following: a) The specific request (program, amount) b) The reasoning and need for assistance c) Description of the company d) A concept plan and description of the project e) The number of jobs created and total compensation (breakdown of wages and benefits) f) Impact to the tax base g) Other impacts to the community h) Traffic demands i) Infrastructure demands and/or needs j) Any additional information that would be helpful to staff and City Council 5. Development must be of the highest quality with high quality building materials and landscaping as agreed between the City and the Developer. 6. If establishing a TIF district, the developer must pay all costs of establishing the district unless the City agrees to allow costs to come out of the district. 7. All projects must be consistent with Chanhassen’s Comprehensive Plan and any other similar plan or guide for development of the community. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. City staff will review the data and make preliminary recommendations to the City Council as to compliance of the application and proposed project with City objectives, and business subsidy criteria, and Comp Plan. 2. After evaluation of the formal recommendation, the City Council will consider approval of the establishment of the Business Subsidy and hold the appropriate hearings. 3. All applications and supporting materials and documents shall become the property of the City. \\cfs5\cfs5\shared_data\admin\cp\economic development\business subsidy\business subsidy guidelines - 2018.docx CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Tuesday, May 29, 2018 Subject Key Financial Strategy: Economic Development Section 5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Todd Gerhardt, City Manager File No: ADM­076 BACKGROUND The City Council wanted to take time this year to talk about "Local Economic Development."  When discussing economic development programs, council must consider a local policy or practice to attract businesses, including possibly offering incentives.  Some communities are increasingly involved in local economic development programs to seek an increase in local jobs, and expand their tax base through local incentives. DISCUSSION The incentive programs available to Chanhassen today are as follows: Tax Abatement (see Attachment #1). Carver County Community Development Program Community Growth Partnership Initiative (see Attachment #2). In some cases, Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing (see Attachment #3). Example:  Venue/Aldi Development. I also wanted to give you a snapshot of how Chanhassen's tax rate and total taxable market value compares to our Key Financial Cities (see Attachment #4).  We have also completed the following economic benchmarks: Total Employment Population Median Household Income Number of Households Based on these benchmarks, Chanhassen is in a really good position compared to the rest of the Key Financial Cities.  We are either first or second in median household income and employment.  For tax rate and taxable market value comparisons, we are first in tax rate of 23.854% for 2017, and first in total market value per capita at $147,529.49.  In total taxable market value, Chanhassen is in second place after Shakopee; however, they have a population of 40,643 and their number of households is 13,692.  Compare this to Chanhassen's population of 25,448 (a difference of 15,195) and number of households of 9,267 (a difference of 4,695) ­ see Attachment #5.  Finally, the City Council should discuss Business Subsidy Criteria (see Attachment #6).  Staff is looking for feedback from the council about how or if they would like to proceed in using business subsidies and the desire to proceed with some type of criteria or not.  Previous city councils have used business subsidies in the past. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTTuesday, May 29, 2018SubjectKey Financial Strategy: Economic DevelopmentSection5:30 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1.Prepared By Todd Gerhardt, City Manager File No: ADM­076BACKGROUNDThe City Council wanted to take time this year to talk about "Local Economic Development."  When discussingeconomic development programs, council must consider a local policy or practice to attract businesses, includingpossibly offering incentives.  Some communities are increasingly involved in local economic development programs toseek an increase in local jobs, and expand their tax base through local incentives.DISCUSSIONThe incentive programs available to Chanhassen today are as follows: Tax Abatement (see Attachment #1). CarverCounty Community Development Program Community Growth Partnership Initiative (see Attachment #2). In somecases, Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing (see Attachment #3). Example:  Venue/Aldi Development. I alsowanted to give you a snapshot of how Chanhassen's tax rate and total taxable market value compares to our KeyFinancial Cities (see Attachment #4).  We have also completed the following economic benchmarks: TotalEmployment Population Median Household Income Number of Households Based on these benchmarks, Chanhassenis in a really good position compared to the rest of the Key Financial Cities.  We are either first or second in medianhousehold income and employment.  For tax rate and taxable market value comparisons, we are first in tax rate of23.854% for 2017, and first in total market value per capita at $147,529.49.  In total taxable market value,Chanhassen is in second place after Shakopee; however, they have a population of 40,643 and their number ofhouseholds is 13,692.  Compare this to Chanhassen's population of 25,448 (a difference of 15,195) and number ofhouseholds of 9,267 (a difference of 4,695) ­ see Attachment #5. Finally, the City Council should discuss Business Subsidy Criteria (see Attachment #6).  Staff is looking for feedbackfrom the council about how or if they would like to proceed in using business subsidies and the desire to proceed with some type of criteria or not.  Previous city councils have used business subsidies in the past. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tax Abatement 2. Carver County CDA Community Growth Partnership Initiative Grant Application 3. Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing 4. Tax Rate and Total Market Value Comparison 5. Economic Benchmark 6. Business Subsidy Criteria City of Chanhassen Avienda Development - Potential City Tax Revenue Summary Use Sq/Ft or Units Per Sq/Ft or Unit Value Total Value Total Tax Capacity Less Fiscal Disparities Net Tax Capacity City Taxes (18.23% TC Rate) Office 150,000 150$ 22,500,000$ 450,000$ 168,780$ 281,220$ 51,279.55$ Lrg Retail 335,000 120$ 40,200,000$ 804,000$ 301,554$ 502,446$ 91,619.47$ Sm Retail 55,000 150$ 8,250,000$ 165,000$ 61,886$ 103,114$ 18,802.50$ MultiFam 225 130,000$ 29,250,000$ 365,625$ -$ 365,625$ 66,670.57$ MultiFam 250 130,000$ 32,500,000$ 406,250$ -$ 406,250$ 74,078.41$ TownHouses 38 150,000$ 5,700,000$ 71,250$ -$ 71,250$ 12,992.21$ Hotel 100 125,000$ 12,500,000$ 250,000$ 93,767$ 156,233$ 28,488.64$ TOTAL N/A N/A 150,900,000$ 2,512,125$ 625,987$ 1,886,138$ 343,931$ Assumptions 1. All development upon completion - no phasing incorporated into the figures 2. Assume base tax classificaiton for office/retail is C/I 3. Assume residential development is rental classification 4. Assumes current Pay 2017 city tax rate (rural) and Fiscal Disparities contribution rate Avienda Development - Potential City Franchise Fee Revenue Summary Use Sq/Ft or Units Fixed Fee Annual Fee Revenue Office 150,000 20.15$ 1,209$ Lrg Retail 335,000 175.75$ 10,545$ Sm Retail 55,000 6.75$ 729$ MultiFam 225 4.27$ 11,529$ MultiFam 250 4.27$ 12,810$ TownHouses 38 4.27$ 3,894$ Hotel 100 175.75$ 4,218$ TOTAL N/A N/A 44,934$ Assumptions 1. All development upon completion - no phasing incorporated into the figures 2. Assumes gas & electric classifcation by use and development pattern 3. Assumes proposed franchise fee as fixed monthly fee (model: Scenario A) 4. Assumes all multifamily at electric residential class; townhomes only with both gas and electric accounts 2.00 572.00 Residential Large Commercial N/A Estimated Electric and Gas Accounts 5.00 5.00 9.00 225.00 250.00 76.00 Classification Medium Commercial Large Commercial Small Commercial Residential Residential 6/19/2017 Base Value Assumptions - Page 1 Avienda Road Improvement Abatement City of Chanhassen City participation only ASSUMPTIONS AND RATES DistrictType:Abatement Current Total Local Tax Rate: 100.7609%Pay 2017 Current CityTax Rate (Rural)18.2347%Pay 2017 First Year Construction or Inflation on Value 2019 Current County Tax Rate 38.8508%Pay 2017 Inflation Rate - Every Year:0.00%Current School District No. 112 Tax Rate 37.0055%Pay 2017 Interest Rate 4.00%Current Other Tax Rate 6.6699%Pay 2017 State-wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes)45.8020%Pay 2017 Present Value Date:1-Feb-18 Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes)0.24963%Pay 2017 First Period Ending 1-Aug-18 Cashflow Assumes First Abatement 2021 PROPERTY TAX CLASSES AND CLASS RATES: Assumes Last Year of Abatement 2040 Exempt Class Rate (Exempt)0.00% Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (C/I Pref.) Fiscal Disparities Election [Inside, Outside or NA]Inside First $150,000 1.50% Incremental or Total Fiscal Disparities Incremental Over $150,000 2.00% Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 37.5067%Pay 2017 Commercial Industrial Class Rate (C/I)2.00% Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 150.0490%Pay 2017 Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental)1.25% Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental)0.75% Term of City Abatement 20 Non-Homestead Residential (Non-H Res.)1.25% Term of County Abatement 0 Homestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.) Term of School District Abatement 0 First $500,000 1.00% School District No.TAG: 2508 112 Over $500,000 1.25% Total Years of Abatement:20 Agricultural Non-Homestead 1.00% Percentage Tax Year Property Current Class After Land Building Total Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After Conversion Map #PID Owner Address Market Value Market Value Market Value for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap.Net Acreage 1 250230500 Level 7 Dev 3,403,200 0 3,403,200 100%3,403,200 Pay 2018 Ag Non-Homestead 34,032 Captured - 23.9 2 250230430 Level 7 Dev 1,723,100 0 1,723,100 100%1,723,100 Pay 2018 Ag Non-Homestead 17,231 Captured - 14.53 3 250230420 Level 7 Dev 429,800 0 429,800 100%429,800 Pay 2018 Non-H Res.5,373 Captured - 2.98 4 250230410 Level 7 Dev 2,090,000 0 2,090,000 100%2,090,000 Pay 2018 Ag Non-Homestead 20,900 Captured - 19.95 5 250230300 Level 7 Dev 6,596,000 0 6,596,000 100%6,596,000 Pay 2018 Ag Non-Homestead 65,960 Captured - 51.1 14,242,100 0 14,242,100 14,242,100 143,496 0 Base Values are for Pay 2018 from the County's website on 6.16.2017. BASE VALUE INFORMATION (Original Tax Capacity) Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:\Minnsota\Chanhassen\Housing - Economic - Redevelopment\Pending Projects\Avienda\Chanhassen Road Improvement abatement model (Avienda).xls 6/19/2017 Base Value Assumptions - Page 2 Avienda Road Improvement Abatement City of Chanhassen City participation only Estimated Taxable Property Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First Year Market Value Market Value Market Tax Project Completed Completed Completed Completed Full Taxes Area/Phase New Use Per Sq. Ft./Unit Per Sq. Ft./Unit Sq. Ft./Units Value Class Tax Capacity 2019 2020 2021 2022 Payable A Retail 120 120 98,000 11,760,000 C/I 235,200 100%100%100%100%2021 B Retail 150 150 9,000 1,350,000 C/I 27,000 100%100%100%100%2021 C MultiFamily 130,000 130,000 225 29,250,000 Rental 365,625 100%100%100%100%2021 D Townhouses 150,000 150,000 38 5,700,000 Rental 71,250 0%0%100%100%2023 E Office 150 150 50,000 7,500,000 C/I 150,000 100%100%100%100%2021 F Retail 150 150 16,000 2,400,000 C/I 48,000 0%100%100%100%2022 G Office 150 150 50,000 7,500,000 C/I 150,000 0%0%100%100%2023 H Office 150 150 50,000 7,500,000 C/I 150,000 0%0%0%100%2024 I Retail 150 150 8,000 1,200,000 C/I 24,000 0%100%100%100%2022 J Retail 150 150 8,000 1,200,000 C/I 24,000 0%100%100%100%2022 K Retail 150 150 8,000 1,200,000 C/I 24,000 0%0%100%100%2023 L Retail 150 150 6,000 900,000 C/I 18,000 0%0%100%100%2023 M Retail 120 120 151,000 18,120,000 C/I 362,400 0%100%100%100%2022 N Retail 120 120 86,000 10,320,000 C/I 206,400 0%0%0%100%2024 O Hotel 125,000 125,000 100 12,500,000 C/I 250,000 0%0%0%100%2024 P MultiFamily 130,000 130,000 250 32,500,000 Rental 406,250 0%0%0%100%2024 TOTAL 150,900,000 2,512,125 Subtotal Residential 513 67,450,000 843,125 Subtotal Commercial/Ind.540,100 83,450,000 1,669,000 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates only and supplied development data. Values should be verified with assessor's office prior to committal. Total Fiscal Local Local Fiscal State-wide Market Tax Disparities Tax Property Disparities Property Value Total Taxes Per New Use Capacity Tax Capacity Capacity Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Sq. Ft./Unit Retail 235,200 88,216 146,984 148,103 132,367 107,726 29,356 417,552 4.26 Retail 27,000 10,127 16,873 17,002 15,195 12,367 3,370 47,933 5.33 MultiFamily 365,625 0 365,625 368,407 0 0 73,016 441,423 1,961.88 Townhouses 71,250 0 71,250 71,792 0 0 14,229 86,021 2,263.71 Office 150,000 56,260 93,740 94,453 84,418 68,703 18,722 266,296 5.33 Retail 48,000 18,003 29,997 30,225 27,014 21,985 5,991 85,215 5.33 Office 150,000 56,260 93,740 94,453 84,418 68,703 18,722 266,296 5.33 Office 150,000 56,260 93,740 94,453 84,418 68,703 18,722 266,296 5.33 Retail 24,000 9,002 14,998 15,113 13,507 10,992 2,996 42,607 5.33 Retail 24,000 9,002 14,998 15,113 13,507 10,992 2,996 42,607 5.33 Retail 24,000 9,002 14,998 15,113 13,507 10,992 2,996 42,607 5.33 Retail 18,000 6,751 11,249 11,334 10,130 8,244 2,247 31,956 5.33 Retail 362,400 135,924 226,476 228,199 203,953 165,986 45,233 643,371 4.26 Retail 206,400 77,414 128,986 129,968 116,159 94,535 25,762 366,423 4.26 Hotel 250,000 93,767 156,233 157,422 140,696 114,505 31,204 443,827 4,438.27 MultiFamily 406,250 0 406,250 409,341 0 0 81,129 490,470 1,961.88 TOTAL 2,512,125 625,987 1,886,138 1,900,489 939,287 764,435 376,689 3,980,901 Note: 1. Taxes and abatement will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. TAX CALCULATIONS PROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity) Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:\Minnsota\Chanhassen\Housing - Economic - Redevelopment\Pending Projects\Avienda\Chanhassen Road Improvement abatement model (Avienda).xls 6/19/2017 Tax Increment Cashflow - Page 3 Avienda Road Improvement Abatement City of Chanhassen City participation only 100%100%100% Project Original Fiscal Captured Combined City, County, Maximum Annual Semi Annual City Abatement County Abatement School Abatement Semi Annual Semi-Annual PERIOD Tax Tax Disparities Tax & School Gross Tax Gross Tax w/ Tax Rate w/ Tax Rate w/ Tax Rate Net Tax Present ENDING Tax Payment Capacity Capacity Incremental Capacity Tax Rate Abatement Abatement 18.2347%38.8508%37.0055%Abatement Value Yrs.Year Date - - - - - 08/01/18 - - - - - 02/01/19 - - - - - 08/01/19 - - - - - 02/01/20 777,825 - (154,603) 623,222 94.091%586,396 293,198 56,821 - - 56,821 51,465 0.5 2020 08/01/20 777,825 - (154,603) 623,222 94.091%586,396 293,198 56,821 - - 56,821 101,921 1 2020 02/01/21 1,236,225 - (326,533) 909,692 94.091%855,938 427,969 82,940 - - 82,940 174,125 1.5 2021 08/01/21 1,236,225 - (326,533) 909,692 94.091%855,938 427,969 82,940 - - 82,940 244,913 2 2021 02/01/22 1,499,475 - (398,546) 1,100,929 94.091%1,035,875 517,937 100,375 - - 100,375 328,902 2.5 2022 08/01/22 1,499,475 - (398,546) 1,100,929 94.091%1,035,875 517,937 100,375 - - 100,375 411,245 3 2022 02/01/23 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 549,551 3.5 2023 08/01/23 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 685,145 4 2023 02/01/24 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 818,080 4.5 2024 08/01/24 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 948,408 5 2024 02/01/25 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 1,076,181 5.5 2025 08/01/25 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 1,201,449 6 2025 02/01/26 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 1,324,260 6.5 2026 08/01/26 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 1,444,664 7 2026 02/01/27 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 1,562,706 7.5 2027 08/01/27 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 1,678,434 8 2027 02/01/28 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 1,791,893 8.5 2028 08/01/28 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 1,903,127 9 2028 02/01/29 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,012,180 9.5 2029 08/01/29 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,119,095 10 2029 02/01/30 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,223,913 10.5 2030 08/01/30 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,326,677 11 2030 02/01/31 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,427,425 11.5 2031 08/01/31 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,526,197 12 2031 02/01/32 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,623,033 12.5 2032 08/01/32 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,717,971 13 2032 02/01/33 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,811,046 13.5 2033 08/01/33 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,902,297 14 2033 02/01/34 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 2,991,759 14.5 2034 08/01/34 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,079,466 15 2034 02/01/35 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,165,454 15.5 2035 08/01/35 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,249,755 16 2035 02/01/36 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,332,404 16.5 2036 08/01/36 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,413,432 17 2036 02/01/37 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,492,871 17.5 2037 08/01/37 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,570,753 18 2037 02/01/38 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,647,107 18.5 2038 08/01/38 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,721,964 19 2038 02/01/39 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94.091%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,795,354 19.5 2039 08/01/39 2,512,125 - (625,987) 1,886,138 94%1,774,686 887,343 171,966 - - 171,966 3,867,305 20 2039 02/01/40 Total 32,647,871 6,327,106 - - 6,327,106 Present Value From 02/01/2018 Present Value Rate 4.00%19,955,294 3,867,305 - - 3,867,305 Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:\Minnsota\Chanhassen\Housing - Economic - Redevelopment\Pending Projects\Avienda\Chanhassen Road Improvement abatement model (Avienda).xls COMMUNITY GROWTH PARTNERSHIP GRANT APPLICATION Introduction. This application requests information about the redevelopment plan, project, and activities. The Redevelopment Plan question portion of the application refers to the entire redevelopment area. The project and activity question portion of the application refers to the specific work to be completed in the redevelopment plan area. General Information Project Name: Applicant City: Applicant Address: Application/Project Contact: Contact Email Address: Phone Number: Authorized Official(s) for Execution of Contracts (name and title): How much funding are you requesting? $ I. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN QUESTIONS 1. Describe the Redevelopment Plan including the city’s goals and need for the Redevelopment Area and anticipated businesses, housing units, and other proposed components. Attach a copy of Redevelopment Plan. 2. Has an end user committed to the redevelopment of the site? Yes No If yes, attach documentation of commitment. 3. Provide a brief history of the site including previous uses, activities, prior or existing contamination, and other attempts at redevelopment. 4. Describe redevelopment within the Redevelopment Plan that has already been completed or is currently underway. 1. Smart Growth: Describe how the Redevelopment Plan incorporates smart growth concepts, including proximity to public transit, pedestrian-friendly design, maximizing green space, mixed land uses, and community building elements. 2. Leverage: Itemize all other funding sources for the Redevelopment Plan. Please include all previously awarded CGP grants. Source of Funds Amount Committed Pending $ $ $ $ $ Total: $ 3. Itemize Redevelopment Plan expenses. Itemized Use of Funds/Expenses Amount Funding Source $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total: $ 1. Environmental Benefits: Has the Redevelopment Plan area been found or suspected to be contaminated? Yes No Does your Redevelopment Plan include the cleanup of contaminated soils, hazardous waste or materials? Yes No If yes, please describe information on the type of cleanup, what measures have been taken to address the contamination, consultant reports, and/or Response Action Plan. Describe positive environmental impacts of the redevelopment plan. 2. Housing Affordability. Indicate the number of housing units planned in the Redevelopment Plan. Attach separate sheet if necessary. Total # of Units # of Owner Units # of Rental Units Proposed Rents/ Sales Prices Single Family $ Townhouse $ Apartments/Condominiums $ Duplexes $ Other $ Will any existing affordable housing be demolished? Yes No If yes, please explain: Will there be any mechanisms to ensure long-term affordability? Yes No If yes, please describe: 3. Economic Benefits What are the current property taxes for the Redevelopment Plan? $ Pay Year What will the estimated property tax be after redevelopment? $ Pay Year How was this figure determined? Who determined it? Project the number of new jobs created after redevelopment. Total new jobs = FTEs. Number of new jobs with wages greater than $14.00 per hour = Project the number of jobs retained after redevelopment. Total retained jobs = FTEs. Number of retained jobs with wages greater than $14.00 per hour = II. PROJECT AND ACTIVITY QUESTIONS Project site address(es): Acreage of site: Number of parcels: Is the Project site publicly or privately owned? Publicly Owned Privately Owned Current Project site owner(s): Current appraised or assessed value of the site: $ Projected appraised or assessed value of the site after Redevelopment: $ Attach the appraisal or assessor’s current and projected values. After Redevelopment is complete, will the Project site be publicly or privately owned? Publicly Owned Privately Owned Post-redevelopment Project site owner(s): When has/will the acquisition be completed? Legal description of Project site (may be separate attachment): 1. Describe the Project including location map, photos, and current and projected site plans. Maps should include property boundaries, north arrow, and bar scale. 2. Describe the Activities that are part of the Project. Is demolition of slum or blighted buildings or other structures an Activity of the Project? Yes No 3. How many residential buildings are on Project site? Commercial buildings? How many residential buildings are vacant? Commercial buildings? 4. Describe how the Project will make more efficient use of the site. 5. Leverage. Itemize all other funding sources for the Project and the Activities identified as part of the Project. Source of Funds Amount Committed Pending $ $ $ $ $ Total: $ Itemize Project expenses for each Activity. Be as detailed as possible. Project Activities/Expenses Costs Funding Source $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total: $ 6. List other sources of funds requested or considered but not obtained for the Project and explain why they were not obtained, to the best of your knowledge. (The purpose of this question is to ensure all funds have been exhausted.) 7. IF the project includes property acquisition, clearance, and/or construction activities, describe how owners, tenants, and businesses will be temporarily or permanently relocated within the Redevelopment Plan. Attach relocation plan, if applicable. 8. Readiness to Proceed. Please provide detailed project timeline with all actions, phases, and anticipated dates for completion. 9. Please indicate whether any of the following entitlement or due diligence actions are required or have been completed for the Project: Zoning amendments or variances: Yes No If yes, Status: Comprehensive plan amendment: Yes No If yes, Status: Environmental review: Yes No If yes, Status: Market or feasibility study: Yes No If yes, Status: Proposed Downtown Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing (TIF) CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2017 CONSIDERED ACTIONS: 1.Adopt a resolution approving modifications to Redevelopment Plan. 2.Approve the contract for Private Redevelopment between the EDA and Chanhassen Frontier LLC. 3.Approve the Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement. “VENUE/ALDI EXAMPLE” 1. Public Hearing to Establish TIF District No. 11 (Venue/Aldi) 252830020 251680031 252830031 What is a TIF District? Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is a public financing method that is used as a subsidy for redevelopment, infrastructure, and other community improvement projects in many countries, including the United States. Original Tax Capacity = $2,193,800 Current Value = $2,193,800 Prop. New Value = $24,338,410 How we plan to use the TIF funds: 1.Within the Tax Increment Financing District #11 (26-year redevelopment TIF district). 2.No more than 25% of the total increment generated from Tax Increment Financing District #11 can be spent within the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area (see map). 3.Because United Properties will benefit from the future Market Boulevard improvements, they will be assessed $2.1 million which will be paid for by the increment generated from TIF District #11. There is also $1.3 million worth of reimbursable expenses for the underground parking ramp, soil correction, and public improvements. What is the source of the $1.3 Million in TIF? The source of the $1.3 million in TIF comes from increment generated from the apartments and Aldi. The total proposed increment generated over 26 years is $7,605,939. (see table on next slide) Market Boulevard Improvements Proposed Cost Breakdown: Venue Special Assessment $2,100,000 Assessment Benefitting Property Owner along Market Boulevard $400,000 Municipal State Aid $900,000 TOTAL COSTS $3,400,000 Analysis of Redevelopment of the Frontier Building Frontier Property Currently After Redevelopment Market Value 2017 $2,193,800 $24,338,410 Total Tax $71,150 $442,883 City Portion of Total Taxes $5,851 Est. $70,000 WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM TIF? Total Property Taxes $442,883 -Less Statewide Taxes 20,542 -Less Fiscal Disparities Adjustment 25,241 -Less Market Value Taxes 57,962 -Less Base Value Taxes 30,093 Annual Gross TIF $309,045 Who Has Received TIF Assistance? 90% of the businesses along West 78th Street and Market Boulevard have received TIF including the following: •Target •Byerlys •Market Square •Country Suites •Dinner Theatres •Colonial Square •Medical Arts Phases I and II •Axel’s •Town Square All businesses within the Chanhassen Lakes Business Park Almost all of the businesses within the Chanhassen Business Center Industrial Park PROPOSED MOTION: The Chanhassen City Council Adopts Resolution Approving Modification to Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Chanhassen Redevelopment Project Area and Tax Increment Financing Plan No. 11 and; The contract for Private Redevelopment by and between the Chanhassen Economic Development Authority and Chanhassen Frontier, LLC and; Finally, Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement with Chanhassen Frontier, LLC. Change20132014201520162017RankAverageOver 5 YearsChanhassen28.2494947327.2386210824.633171624.2524915823.85464133First25.64568406-9.22%Chaska28.0752604926.5862947324.9282998226.1184070427.5640409926.65446061-5.06%Cottage Grove45.0458042843.8116992241.5913928243.1396705143.0116013343.32003363-3.83%Elk River50.37348.54447.1946.1746.19347.694-5.32%Inver Grove Heights46.31246.12848.13149.56451.64448.35584.41%Lino Lakes46.77446.68343.7746.01945.1445.6772-2.34%Prior Lake31.887230.735831.988431.952532.685131.8498-0.12%Rosemount48.86247.67645.15243.14941.83245.3342-7.22%Savage55.507655.277751.742549.905147.8404952.054678-6.22%Shakopee41.99641.436637.861837.901738.521539.54352-5.84%Stillwater61.5027045858.3592958554.9159059857.0164872556.9268488657.7442485-6.11%Average41.3830202342.17032953-4.26%Change20132014201520162017RankAverageOver 5 YearsChanhassen3,052,117,600 3,230,182,400 3,619,126,400 3,841,048,700 3,829,128,000 Second3,514,320,620 15.144%Chaska1,870,836,000 1,982,696,500 2,241,076,300 2,573,342,000 2,508,978,900 2,235,385,940 19.486%Cottage Grove2,410,395,000 2,512,979,300 2,796,700,300 2,878,628,800 2,973,737,400 2,714,488,160 12.616%Elk River1,617,442,900 1,641,360,700 1,754,483,500 1,846,327,700 1,929,048,470 1,757,732,654 8.674%Inver Grove Heights2,720,514,055 2,798,175,018 3,005,516,326 3,198,957,044 3,270,107,980 2,998,654,085 10.224%Lino Lakes1,519,857,242 1,509,921,169 1,694,366,064 1,699,288,883 1,808,417,118 1,646,370,095 8.324%Prior Lake2,372,776,200 2,445,568,700 2,620,934,100 2,842,299,000 2,933,817,200 2,643,079,040 11.392%Rosemount1,866,877,179 1,948,614,357 2,127,597,965 2,287,080,004 2,434,763,942 2,132,986,689 14.254%Savage2,311,627,400 2,434,515,600 2,658,879,100 2,799,512,900 2,957,985,300 2,632,504,060 13.881%Shakopee3,064,695,700 3,206,518,700 3,629,757,200 3,844,106,800 4,034,313,200 First3,555,878,320 16.027%Stillwater1,757,161,300 1,758,884,000 1,983,555,200 2,074,158,800 2,118,682,600 1,938,488,380 10.319%Average2,799,907,283 2,524,535,277 12.76%20132014201520162017RankAverageChanhassen 126,355.52 131,828.04 143,650.33 150,937.15 147,529.49 First140,060 Chaska 75,403.49 78,460.49 87,518.11 97,331.29 83,034.78 84,350 Cottage Grove 68,084.48 71,290.19 78,567.83 80,097.63 72,401.02 74,088 Elk RiverInver Grove HeightsLino Lakes 72,954.31 71,462.03 82,575.47 81,684.80 76,064.27 76,948 Prior Lake 97,955.51 98,172.24 104,632.28 111,375.35 100,591.30 102,545 Rosemount 82,586.91 86,643.59 92,335.65 97,078.82 90,429.07 89,815 Savage 80,817.66 83,812.98 88,558.46 92,438.93 85,462.68 86,218 Shakopee 79,189.06 81,130.45 90,171.34 94,582.26 86,854.42 86,386 Stillwater 92,628.43 93,102.05 100,412.84 105,324.67 94,137.37 97,121 Average92,945 93,059 TOTAL TAX CAPACITY RATE (not including emv based)TOTAL TAXABLE MARKET VALUEKFS Tax Rate & Total Taxable Market Value ComparisonTOTAL MARKET VALUE PER CAPITA Economic Benchmark 5/23/2018 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 RANK AVERAGE* Chanhassen Employment 11,215 10,950 11,371 13,141 13,381 14,452 14,822 15,283 2 14,910 Population 22,952 23,247 23,779 24,155 24,503 25,194 25,448 6 25,955 Median HH Income 98,913 100,284 102,700 104,244 105,563 108,078 110,569 115,449 1 117,615 Households 8,352 8,461 8,629 8,814 8,936 9,113 9,267 5 9,346 Chaska Employment 11,123 11,654 11,711 11,962 12,422 12,741 12,393 12,855 Population 23,770 24,002 24,211 24,811 25,270 25,607 26,439 4 26,820 Median HH Income 67,344 70,707 71,490 71,576 71,791 71,965 75,828 76,301 77,100 Households 8,816 8,874 8,941 9,143 9,278 9,492 9,823 4 9,967 Cottage Grove Employment 6,263 6,484 6,479 6,211 6,473 6,812 6,974 7,988 8,108 Population 34,589 34,828 35,187 35,403 35,250 35,596 35,939 2 36,132 Median HH Income 81,749 82,469 82,107 81,699 82,485 83,181 85,516 86,054 Households 11,719 11,804 11,896 11,959 11,869 12,040 12,169 2 12,233 Lino Lakes Employment 3,313 3,460 3,584 3,811 3,945 4,144 4,241 4,321 Population 20,216 20,505 20,625 20,833 21,129 20,519 20,803 20,887 Median HH Income 90,456 93,591 95,138 98,989 99,424 103,407 102,904 105,934 2 107,697 Households 6,174 6,275 6,323 6,382 6,374 6,412 6,529 6,580 Prior Lake Employment 7,766 7,852 7,997 8,161 8,176 8,130 8,317 8,317 Population 22,796 23,010 23,385 24,223 24,911 25,049 25,520 5 25,909 Median HH Income 89,428 90,360 89,805 93,219 93,897 95,692 96,405 101,128 3 102,666 Households 8,447 8,541 8,660 8,864 9,041 9,180 9,291 6 9,412 Rosemount Employment 6,721 7,014 6,925 7,158 8,108 8,482 8,164 7,258 Population 21,874 22,139 22,384 22,605 22,490 23,042 23,559 23,800 Median HH Income 81,558 82,395 84,395 84,325 85,348 86,845 90,448 92,939 94,445 Households 7,587 7,666 7,739 7,821 7,852 8,095 8,296 8,397 Savage Employment 6,753 6,792 7,007 7,123 7,327 7,660 7,601 8,477 Population 26,911 27,147 27,552 28,603 29,047 30,024 30,285 3 30,767 Median HH Income 90,833 89,183 91,361 92,224 91,146 94,432 94,620 97,584 98,784 Households 9,116 9,192 9,307 9,568 9,724 10,069 10,202 3 10,357 Shakopee Employment 18,831 19,304 18,876 18,972 19,665 21,004 22,346 1 25,930 Population 37,076 37,652 38,252 38,701 39,523 40,254 40,643 1 41,153 Median HH Income 77,742 77,018 78,028 78,713 78,540 79,670 78,731 79,648 80,024 Households 12,772 12,958 13,113 13,329 13,455 13,573 13,692 1 13,823 Stillwater Employment 9,628 9,463 9,583 9,640 9,599 9,591 9,819 10,105 Population 18,227 18,299 15,638 18,970 18,892 19,754 19,693 19,902 Median HH Income 69,873 70,090 70,131 69,937 67,012 75,200 76,970 79,293 80,608 Households 7,076 7,130 7,196 7,309 7,342 7,585 7,614 7,691 Sources: Minnesota State Demographer's Office Department of Employment and Economic Development *Based on average increase 2010 - 2016 C:\Program Files (x86)\neevia.com\docConverterPro\temp\NVDC\6BAA57C8-4CEE-4632-941D-6BCB749039E6\Chanhassen.868.1.Economic_Benchmark.xlsx CITY OF CHANHASSEN BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA Approved October 11, 1999 Amended April 28, 2003 Amended ___________, 2016 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA Policy and Criteria for Business Subsidy GENERAL POLICY The City Council of the City of Chanhassen has the power, should it deem necessary, to grant business subsidies. The fundamental purpose of Business Subsidy Criteria in Chanhassen is to encourage desirable and affordable housing that would not otherwise occur “but for” the assistance provided by the City of Chanhassen Business Subsidy Criteria. This Business Subsidy Criteria shall be used as a guide in processing and reviewing applications requesting business subsidy. PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA Business Subsidies can benefit the community by providing a broad range of affordable housing opportunities. The Council reserves the right to approve or reject business subsidies on an individual basis. Highest Priority Shall Be Given to Projects Which Include: 1. Compatibility of the proposed project with the City’s overall development plans and objectives. 2. Broad range of housing opportunities such as affordable housing. 3. Minimal impact on City service needs. 4. High quality of the facility to be built. 5. Increase in Tax Base: While an increase in the tax base cannot be the sole grounds for granting a subsidy, the EDA believes it is a necessary condition for any subsidy. 6. Economic Development: Projects should promote one or more of the following: • Encourage economic and commercial diversity within the community; • Provide basic goods and services, increase the range of goods and services available, or encourage fast-growing businesses; • Promote redevelopment objectives and removal of blight, including pollution cleanup; • Promote additional or spin-off development within the community; • Encourage full utilization of existing or planned infrastructure improvements. 2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 1. Applicant at all times should retain and be assisted by qualified financial consultants and/or underwriters, and legal counsel. 2. Construction of the project shall not be commenced until the City has given preliminary approval to the application for financing. 3. The City reserves the right to deny any application for financing at any stage of the proceedings prior to adoption of the final approval authorizing issuance of the bonds. 4. The City reserves the right to select a third party administrator to assist in the management of the process. 5. Development must be of the highest quality with high quality building materials and landscaping as agreed between the City and the Developer. 6. Developer must pay all costs of establishing the district unless the City agrees to allow costs to come out of the district. 7. Local requirements may be more stringent than State statute as applies to TIF. 8. Project meets “but for” analysis and statutory qualifications (Exhibit A). 9. All projects must be consistent with Chanhassen’s Comprehensive Plan and any other similar plan or guide for development of the community. ACTIVITIES TO BE CONSIDERED FOR FINANCING 1. Any subsidy granted by the city will be subject to the requirement of a public hearing, if necessary, and must be approved by the Chanhassen City Council. 2. It will be necessary for both the grantee and the EDA (City of Chanhassen) to comply with the reporting and monitoring requirements of the Act. 3. Land write down 4. Costs of streets and utilities 5. Demolition and relocation costs 6. City costs such as trunk utility costs, street costs, and MSA reimbursement 7. Extraordinary landscaping and lighting 8. Soil corrections 3 APPLICATION PROCESS 1. The application process must be completed in accordance with TIF application procedures (Exhibit B). 2. Applicant shall make an application for TIF usage on forms available from the City. 3. The application will include (if appropriate): a. Statement of Public Purposes b. Description of Project c. Plans and Drawings of Project d. Description of Company e. Legal Opinions f. Investment Bank Letter of Feasibility g. Market Analysis h. Pro Forma Analysis i. Financial Statements j. Zoning and Planning Analysis k. Application Fee l. Demonstration of past successful general development capability as well as specific capability in the type and size of development proposed. m. Other Documentation Requested by the City 4. The City’s Business Subsidy program will be administered by the City of Chanhassen’s Economic Development Authority (EDA). The applicant shall submit a completed application and a $2,000 non-refundable application fee. The application fee shall be paid to the City of Chanhassen at the time a final Business Subsidy application is submitted. At the time a final Business Subsidy application is submitted, the applicant shall also deliver to the City a deposit in the amount of $10,000. The purpose of this deposit is to reimburse the City for costs and expenses incurred in connection with preparation of the development agreement and the carrying out of all actions necessary in the fulfillment of the City’s obligations. Any part of the deposit not needed for those purposes shall be promptly returned to the Redeveloper not later than the date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion, or within 15 days following the termination of the Development Agreement for failure to close. It is understood the deposit is not a limitation on the Redeveloper’s obligation to reimburse the City for such costs; and the Redeveloper shall pay the City for any such costs in excess of the deposit within 30 days following a written request to do so. 5. City staff will review the data and make preliminary recommendations to the City Council as to compliance of the application and proposed project with City objectives and criteria/Strategic Plan. 6. Formal evaluation of the application will include, in addition to items subject to preliminary review, review of applicable credit analysis, credit enhancement and legal compliance. Formal recommendation will then be made to the City Council. 4 7. After evaluation of the formal recommendation, the City Council will consider final approval of the establishment of the Business Subsidy and hold the appropriate hearings. 8. All applications and supporting materials and documents shall become the property of the City. 5 CITY OF CHANHASSEN APPLICATION FOR BUSINESS SUBSIDY Business Name: Address: Location of Proposed Development: Type (Partnership, etc.): Nature of Business: Telephone: Project Cost Breakdown: $ $ $ $ Total: $ Date: HISTORY OF APPLICANT 1. Have you ever filed bankruptcy? Yes____ No____ If yes, provide details on separate sheet. 2. Have you ever defaulted on any loan commitment? Yes____ No____ If yes, provide details on separate sheet. 3. Have you ever applied for conventional financing for the project? Yes____ No____ If yes, provide details on separate sheet. If no, why not? 6 4. List financial references: (Name/Address/Contact) a. b. c. 5. Other information pertinent to your application: 6. Name of Counsel: 7 INFORMATION CONCERNING APPLICANT’S PROPOSED PROJECT 1. Is the proposed project a new facility or rehabilitation and/or expansion of existing facility? 2. Industrial/Commercial: 3. What is the present employment of your firm? 4. What will the employment be at completion of project? 5. Estimated Project Cost? 6. What is the principal business or product of the company? 7. Potential other use of proposed development? 8. Will this development attract other related industries? Yes____ No____ If yes, how? 9. What are the proposed financing arrangements? 8 INFORMATION CONCERNING APPLICANT’S PROPOSED HOUSING PROJECT 1. Is the proposed housing project a new facility or rehabilitation and/or expansion of existing facility? 2. Housing Type (single family, multi-family, apartments, condominiums, etc.): 3. Number of units: 4. Number of bedrooms in each unit: 5. Sale price of the units: OR 6. Rental price of the units: 7. Estimated total project cost and breakdown of overall development costs? 8. Who are you principally marketing your product to? 9. How long do you think it will take to sell or rent your product? 10. Do you have linkages/contacts with Chanhassen businesses? Yes____ No____ If yes, please explain. (Reason: To determine if you are meeting the local business needs) 11. What are the proposed financing arrangements? 12. How are you proposing to meet alternate transportation needs? 9 EXHIBIT A SAMPLE “BUT-FOR” ANALYSIS WITH NO BUSINESS SUBSIDY WITH BUSINESS SUBSIDY Sources and Uses Sources and Uses SOURCES SOURCES Mortgage 9,600,000 8,667,000 Equity 2,400,000 2,400,000 Tax Increment 0 933,000 TOTAL SOURCES $12,000,000 $12,000,000 USES USES Land 1,500,000 1,500,000 Site Work 300,000 300,000 Soil Correction 468,000 468,000 Demolition 100,000 100,000 Relocation 65,000 65,000 Subtotal Land Costs $2,433,000 $2,433,000 Construction 6,750,000 6,750,000 Finish Manufacturing 250,000 250,000 Subtotal Construction Costs $7,000,000 $7,000,000 Soft Costs 350,000 350,000 Taxes 35,000 35,000 Finance Fees 850,000 850,000 Project Manager 542,000 542,000 Developer Fee 540,000 540,000 Contingency 250,000 250,000 Subtotal Soft Costs $2,567,000 $2,567,000 TOTAL USES $12,000,000 $12,000,000 Income Statement Income Statement SF per SF Total SF Per SF Total Rent-Space 1 100,000 $8.00 $800,000 100,000 $8.00 $800,000 Rent-Space 2 25,000 $8.00 $212,000 25,000 $8.00 $212,000 Rent-Space 3 25,000 $9.00 $225,000 25,000 $9.00 $225,000 Other 0 $0.00 0 0 $0.00 0 $1,237,500 $1,237,500 Mortgage 20 Term $1,051,646 20 Term $949,439 9.00% Interest 9.00% Interest $9,600,000 $8,667,000 Net Income $185,854 $288,061 Total Return on Equity 7.74% 12.00% 10 “BUT-FOR” ANALYSIS WORKSHEET WITH NO BUSINESS SUBSIDY WITH BUSINESS SUBSIDY Sources and Uses Sources and Uses SOURCES SOURCES Mortgage Equity Tax Increment TOTAL SOURCES USES USES Land Site Work Soil Correction Demolition Relocation Subtotal Land Costs Construction Finish Manufacturing Subtotal Construction Costs Soft Costs Taxes Finance Fees Project Manager Developer Fee Contingency Subtotal Soft Costs TOTAL USES Income Statement Income Statement SF per SF Total SF Per SF Total Rent-Space 1 Rent-Space 2 Rent-Space 3 Other Mortgage Net Income Total Return on Equity 11 I hereby certify the above financial information is true and accurate. _______________________________________ Signature _______________________________________ Title _______________________________________ Date 12 EXHIBIT B CITY OF CHANHASSEN APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR BUSINESS SUBSIDY 1. Applicant shall meet with City staff to discuss the scope of the project, public assistance being requested, time schedule and other information as may be necessary. 2. Following an initial meeting, applicant shall complete a Business Subsidy application. The completed application shall be submitted to the Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority. 3. The application shall be reviewed by City staff on a preliminary basis as to the feasibility of the project. City staff shall prepare a report on the project. 4. The application shall be placed on an EDA agenda for concept review. The applicant may make a presentation of the project at that time. City staff will present its preliminary findings. 5. The following items must accompany the application: a. $2,000 application fee b. Completed “but-for” worksheet c. $10,000 application deposit d. Statement of Public Purpose e. Description of Project f. Plans and Drawing of Project g. Company Background Material h. Letter of Feasibility i. Market Analysis j. Pro Forma Analysis k. Financial Statements l. Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Analysis m. Other Pertinent Information 6. Following the necessary analysis of the application by City staff, a report shall be prepared and presented to the EDA for formal action. If the application is approved, City staff will be directed to undertake the following steps: a. Prepare a redevelopment agreement between the City of Chanhassen and the Developer; b. Prepare or modify the redevelopment plan and TIF plan if required. 7. If zoning amendments or Planning Commission action is required as part of the project, the appropriate actions shall be taken prior to final consideration of the redevelopment agreement. 13 8. Applicant must follow all city development review processes (e.g. site plan, platting, rezoning, PUD, etc.) before final Business Subsidy application may be approved. If you have any questions concerning the Business Subsidy application process, please contact: City of Chanhassen EDA Executive Director 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1119 g:\admin\cp\business subsidy\city of chanhassen updated business subsidy plan.docx CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Approve Temporary On­Sale Liquor License Request; St. Hubert Catholic Community; St. Paul Street Evangelization Midwest Gala on October 13, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: E.6. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ St. Hubert Catholic Community PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the temporary on­sale liquor license request from St. Hubert Catholic Community for hosting the St. Paul Street Evangelization Midwest Gala on October 13, 2018. The fee for said license will be $1.00.” Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY St. Hubert Catholic Community has submitted an application for a temporary on­sale liquor license for hosting the St. Paul Street Evangelization Midwest Gala on Saturday, October 13, 2018 immediately following the 5:15 pm mass.  The event will be held in the fellowship hall at the church.  A catered dinner and wine will be served to approximately 100 paying guests.  The event is expected to be concluded by 10:15 pm.  Liquor liability insurance has been provided for the event. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the request from St. Hubert Catholic Community for a temporary on­sale liquor license for hosting the St. Paul Street Evangelization Midwest Gala on October 13, 2018. The fee is $1.00. ATTACHMENTS: Application Form TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Taxexempt number St. Hubert Catholic Community 1865 18567927 Address Minnesota Department of Public Safety DAlcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division lChanhassen Minnesota 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 Name of person making application 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Taxexempt number St. Hubert Catholic Community 1865 18567927 Address City State Zip Code 8201 Main Street lChanhassen Minnesota 55317 Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Molly Ryan 952-374-5040 Date(s) of event October 13, 2018 Organization officer's name Type of organization © Microdistillery Small Brewer Club ® Charitable OX Religious © Other non-profit City State Zip Code Fr. Rolf Tollefson Chanhassen Minnesota 1 55317 Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Minnesota Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Minnesota Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Minnesota Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. St. Paul Street Evangelization Midwest Gala to be held in the St. Hubert Fellowship Hall on Saturday, October, 13, 2018 following the 5:15 pm mass and ending by 10:15 pm. immediately If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Catholic Mutual Policy 8589 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City of Chanhassen September 24, 2018 City or County approving the license Date Approved 1.00 October 13, 2018 Fee Amount Permit Date September 21, 2018 kmeuwissen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Date Fee Paid City or County E-mail Address 952-227-1107 cLt_7Z,A.,Q(Lv City or County Phone Number Signat e City rk or County 0cLal Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/COUNTY TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATIONCaSTATE.MN.US CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Fire Department Update Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: G.1. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No:  SUMMARY The monthly update for the Chanhassen Fire Department to include call data from August 2018.  BACKGROUND Fire Department Staffing Staffing is at 43 of 45 paid on­call firefighters as of the end of August. We have one firefighter currently on leave. A firefighter from the west end will be resigning in mid­September due to a job change out of the metro area.  Fire Department Response The fire department responded to 72 calls in August. Year­to­date total was 566 calls and represents a 12.9% increase over 2017. Comparing this year to the past five­year average we have seen a 26% increase in call volume.  Significant calls included the following: 42 Rescue/EMS calls with 8 motor vehicle accidents 2 Structure Fire Responses Green Leaf Ct – Small fire involving power strip Mutual Aid Response to Chaska Monthly Training Training that occurred since my last update: Officer training consisted of basic fire investigation and introduction to the new Records Management System Software Ladder and Rope Fundamentals Truck Maintenance and Weekly Truck Check Protocols Other Activities September 10, we had an internal get together of retirees and active firefighters to prepare the transfer of Ladder 11. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectFire Department UpdateSectionFIRE DEPARTMENT/LAWENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: G.1.Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: SUMMARYThe monthly update for the Chanhassen Fire Department to include call data from August 2018. BACKGROUNDFire Department StaffingStaffing is at 43 of 45 paid on­call firefighters as of the end of August. We have one firefighter currently on leave. Afirefighter from the west end will be resigning in mid­September due to a job change out of the metro area. Fire Department ResponseThe fire department responded to 72 calls in August. Year­to­date total was 566 calls and represents a 12.9%increase over 2017. Comparing this year to the past five­year average we have seen a 26% increase in call volume. Significant calls included the following:42 Rescue/EMS calls with 8 motor vehicle accidents2 Structure Fire ResponsesGreen Leaf Ct – Small fire involving power stripMutual Aid Response to ChaskaMonthly TrainingTraining that occurred since my last update:Officer training consisted of basic fire investigation and introduction to the new Records Management SystemSoftwareLadder and Rope FundamentalsTruck Maintenance and Weekly Truck Check ProtocolsOther Activities September 10, we had an internal get together of retirees and active firefighters to prepare the transfer of Ladder 11. Chief Rick Rice (ret.) and Chief Roger Smallbeck (ret.) were on hand for photos and videos.  September 11, Ladder 11 proudly displayed her flag for the last time over Chanhassen in honor of 9/11. That evening some original truck committee members and active firefighters were on hand to turn Ladder 11 over to members of the Pine City Fire Department. We hosted a barbecue and trained until they took her home.  Truck 1, Ladder 11's replacement, will be completed by September 24. A select group of truck committee members will travel to Appleton, WI for the final inspection on September 26/27. From there Truck 1 will head to the dealer in Apple Valley, MN for dealer prep and delivery. I have authorized the dealer to display Truck 1 at the Minnesota State Fire Chiefs Conference on October 11/12 and deliver the vehicle to Chanhassen on October 1. We will begin our training at that time. September 24, we conducted the Chanhassen Fire Department Open House. I am extremely proud of the preparation work done on this project. Many aspects of our open house have changed and we have brought in some help from the community. Overall this is a top­notch event and we are excited to carry our fire prevention message forward through this public event. Fire Marshal Update Construction Projects of Note/Fire Inspections: West Park II Townhomes: Another set of townhomes along Maggie Way are under construction, with several units given occupancy on Rockburn Lane and Wildflower Lane. Cub foods continues to remodel with several areas under renovation. The old coffee store area changed occupancy to a new employee break room. Currently, the new pharmacy and bakery area are under renovation and will be completed soon. IWCO finished a large office area remodel and was given occupancy. Several reoccurring false alarm issues were addressed at both AmericInn and Lyman Lumber. AmericInn was found to have non­functioning smoke detectors in about half of their hotel rooms. They were given one week to comply with changing all detectors to functioning detectors or risk being temporarily shut down for guest and employee safety issues. The owner flew into town and handled all outstanding issues by the deadline. Prairie Adult Daycare was given full occupancy and DHS licensing at Discovery United Methodist Church. Preliminary flush testing was completed at the new Panera site in preparation for sprinkler system tie in and domestic water hook up. All hotels in the city were re­inspected and all are now in full compliance with repairing outstanding items from previous fire inspections. I attended the CR­61 Remodel Project Emergency management meeting at Carver County EOC. The closure and delays in this area affect our response to this southeast area of the city to a few residential areas and businesses, and also our mutual aid calls to Eden Prairie. Fire Prevention We visited Primrose Academy for a Fire Truck tour for over 100 students. I participated in our National Night Out as the officer on Engine 11. We visited 9 parties over the evening. I was able to hand out quite a bit of fire prevention literature and even did a few fire safety tours of some residences in order to assist them with smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, and fire escape plans. A large recall of Vornado brand space heaters took place at the end of August. This directly relates to a previous fire incident in town that resulted in a fatality. Fire Investigations No fire investigations took place this month. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectFire Department UpdateSectionFIRE DEPARTMENT/LAWENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: G.1.Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: SUMMARYThe monthly update for the Chanhassen Fire Department to include call data from August 2018. BACKGROUNDFire Department StaffingStaffing is at 43 of 45 paid on­call firefighters as of the end of August. We have one firefighter currently on leave. Afirefighter from the west end will be resigning in mid­September due to a job change out of the metro area. Fire Department ResponseThe fire department responded to 72 calls in August. Year­to­date total was 566 calls and represents a 12.9%increase over 2017. Comparing this year to the past five­year average we have seen a 26% increase in call volume. Significant calls included the following:42 Rescue/EMS calls with 8 motor vehicle accidents2 Structure Fire ResponsesGreen Leaf Ct – Small fire involving power stripMutual Aid Response to ChaskaMonthly TrainingTraining that occurred since my last update:Officer training consisted of basic fire investigation and introduction to the new Records Management SystemSoftwareLadder and Rope FundamentalsTruck Maintenance and Weekly Truck Check ProtocolsOther ActivitiesSeptember 10, we had an internal get together of retirees and active firefighters to prepare the transfer of Ladder 11.Chief Rick Rice (ret.) and Chief Roger Smallbeck (ret.) were on hand for photos and videos. September 11, Ladder 11 proudly displayed her flag for the last time over Chanhassen in honor of 9/11. That eveningsome original truck committee members and active firefighters were on hand to turn Ladder 11 over to members of thePine City Fire Department. We hosted a barbecue and trained until they took her home. Truck 1, Ladder 11's replacement, will be completed by September 24. A select group of truck committee memberswill travel to Appleton, WI for the final inspection on September 26/27. From there Truck 1 will head to the dealer inApple Valley, MN for dealer prep and delivery. I have authorized the dealer to display Truck 1 at the Minnesota StateFire Chiefs Conference on October 11/12 and deliver the vehicle to Chanhassen on October 1. We will begin ourtraining at that time.September 24, we conducted the Chanhassen Fire Department Open House. I am extremely proud of the preparationwork done on this project. Many aspects of our open house have changed and we have brought in some help from thecommunity. Overall this is a top­notch event and we are excited to carry our fire prevention message forward throughthis public event.Fire Marshal UpdateConstruction Projects of Note/Fire Inspections:West Park II Townhomes: Another set of townhomes along Maggie Way are under construction, with severalunits given occupancy on Rockburn Lane and Wildflower Lane.Cub foods continues to remodel with several areas under renovation. The old coffee store area changedoccupancy to a new employee break room. Currently, the new pharmacy and bakery area are under renovationand will be completed soon.IWCO finished a large office area remodel and was given occupancy.Several reoccurring false alarm issues were addressed at both AmericInn and Lyman Lumber. AmericInn wasfound to have non­functioning smoke detectors in about half of their hotel rooms. They were given one week tocomply with changing all detectors to functioning detectors or risk being temporarily shut down for guest andemployee safety issues. The owner flew into town and handled all outstanding issues by the deadline.Prairie Adult Daycare was given full occupancy and DHS licensing at Discovery United Methodist Church.Preliminary flush testing was completed at the new Panera site in preparation for sprinkler system tie in anddomestic water hook up.All hotels in the city were re­inspected and all are now in full compliance with repairing outstanding items fromprevious fire inspections.I attended the CR­61 Remodel Project Emergency management meeting at Carver County EOC. The closureand delays in this area affect our response to this southeast area of the city to a few residential areas andbusinesses, and also our mutual aid calls to Eden Prairie.Fire PreventionWe visited Primrose Academy for a Fire Truck tour for over 100 students.I participated in our National Night Out as the officer on Engine 11. We visited 9 parties over the evening. I wasable to hand out quite a bit of fire prevention literature and even did a few fire safety tours of some residences inorder to assist them with smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, and fire escape plans.A large recall of Vornado brand space heaters took place at the end of August. This directly relates to aprevious fire incident in town that resulted in a fatality.Fire Investigations No fire investigations took place this month. ATTACHMENTS: Graphs and Charts 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 June July Aug 2018 Calls by Month and Type Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire 50 53 53 53 58 61 81 54 52 66 51 5855 51 63 65 55 86 66 60 59 80 57 56 71 50 66 79 86 76 66 72 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Chanhassen Fire Department Calls By Month Comparison 2016 2017 2018 621 691 690 753 621 691 690 753 850 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 PROJECTEDNumber of CallsYears Chanhassen Fire Department Total Calls by Year -5 Year Table 52% 16% 17% 6% 5%4% 2018 % OF TOTAL CALLS BY TYPE Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Alarm Calls Good Intent Call Hazardous Condition Service Call Fire City of Chanhassen Fire Calls for Ser vice8/1/2018 - 8/31/2018 K Fire Box Alarm Zones Calls for Serv ice North Bo x South Bo x We st Bo x Date: 9/13/2018Document Path: K:\Nick LH\Pro jects\Fire\Fo rDon\FireCa llMa ps\2 018\A ug ust\Fire Inc ident Map Ge ocode August 2 018.mxd CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Law Enforcement Update Section FIRE DEPARTMENT/LAW ENFORCEMENT UPDATE Item No: G.2. Prepared By Lieutenant Eric Kittelson File No:  ATTACHMENTS: Law Enforcement Update­Cover Memo Activity Description by Class August 2018 Statistics July­Jun 2016­17 July­June 2017­18 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Resolution No. 2018­43: Approve Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easements at 765 & 775 Crossroads Court Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: H.1. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Planning Case 2015­16 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility easements on Lots 15 and 16, Block 1, Arbor Glen." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The property owner of 765 and 775 Crossroads Court has requested the city vacate the easterly 5 feet and westerly 5 feet of 10­foot drainage and utility easements of their parcels located on Arbor Glen, Lots 15 and 16, respectively. The entire drainage and utility easement is not being vacated, yet brought into conformance with city standards and easement configuration of the surrounding lots. The drainage and utility easements on Lots 15 and 16 were originally sized with an additional 5 feet beyond standard for a stormwater pipe that ran between the lots; however, the pipe was removed and relocated elsewhere under the approval of the Engineering Department. No existing public or private utilities, structures, or appurtenances are within the requested vacation area. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility easements dedicated as follows: 1. The easterly 5.00 feet of the westerly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 15, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota (765 Crossroads Court­PIN 25.0840150); and 2. The westerly 5.00 feet of the easterly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 16, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota (775 Crossroads Court­PIN 25.0840160). CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectResolution No. 2018­43: Approve Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easements at 765 & 775Crossroads CourtSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: H.1.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Planning Case 2015­16PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility easements onLots 15 and 16, Block 1, Arbor Glen."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe property owner of 765 and 775 Crossroads Court has requested the city vacate the easterly 5 feet and westerly5 feet of 10­foot drainage and utility easements of their parcels located on Arbor Glen, Lots 15 and 16, respectively.The entire drainage and utility easement is not being vacated, yet brought into conformance with city standards andeasement configuration of the surrounding lots. The drainage and utility easements on Lots 15 and 16 were originallysized with an additional 5 feet beyond standard for a stormwater pipe that ran between the lots; however, the pipe wasremoved and relocated elsewhere under the approval of the Engineering Department.No existing public or private utilities, structures, or appurtenances are within the requested vacation area.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utilityeasements dedicated as follows:1. The easterly 5.00 feet of the westerly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north10.00 feet, Lot 15, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County,Minnesota (765 Crossroads Court­PIN 25.0840150); and2. The westerly 5.00 feet of the easterly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 16, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota (775 Crossroads Court­PIN 25.0840160). ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Vacation Survey ­ Lot 15 Proposed Vacation Survey ­ Lot 16 Vacation Application Published Notice of Public Hearing Resolution Granting Vacation Affidavit of Mailing CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND UTILTY EASEMENTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 24th, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §412.851 to consider the vacation of public drainage and utility easements located at 765 and 775 Crossroads Court, legally described as follows: A drainage and utility easement over, under and across the easterly 5.00 feet of the westerly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 15, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. (765 Crossroads Court-PIN 25.0840150) And A drainage and utility easement over, under and across the westerly 5.00 feet of the easterly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 16, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. (775 Crossroads Court-PIN 25.0840160) All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. George Bender, PE, Assistant City Engineer Phone: 952-227-1164 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on September 13th & 20th, 2018) 199038v1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: September 24, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION VACATING PUBLIC DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS 765 and 775 CROSSROADS COURT, CHANHASSEN WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, after two (2) weeks’ published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before the hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation, the Chanhassen City Council has conducted a hearing to consider the vacation of the public drainage and utility easements legally described on the attached Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation, the Council has determined that it is in the public interest to vacate the public and drainage and utility easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The public drainage and utility easements legally described on the attached Exhibit A are hereby vacated. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. The City Manager is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Carver County. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 199038v1 EXHIBIT “A” to RESOLUTION NO. 2018-___ A drainage and utility easement over, under and across the easterly 5.00 feet of the westerly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 15, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. (765 Crossroads Court-PIN 25.0840150) And A drainage and utility easement over, under and across the westerly 5.00 feet of the easterly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 16, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. (775 Crossroads Court-PIN 25.0840160) CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COLTNTY OF CARVER ) I, Kim T. Meuwissen, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes that she is and was on September 6, 2018, the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen, Minnesota; that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing to Consider Vacation of Public Drainage and Utility Easements at765 and775 Crossroads Court, Planning Case File No. 2015-16, to the persons named on attached Exhibit ..A", by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner, and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the Uniled States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon; that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer, Carver County, Minnesota, and by other appropriate records. Subscribed and swQrn to before me this ibs day of V0)c,.r-bE- , 2018.JEAN M. STECKLING f.lotary Publlc-Mlnnesota W CornnL.lon Ee}I&n 3r,2013 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND UTILTY EASEMENTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 24th,2}ll,at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Markei Boulevard, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes $412.851 to consider the vacation of public drainage and utility easements 765 & 775 Crossroads Court, described as: Lots 15 and 16, Block 1, Arbor Glen i, 3!l 2r.--7,?r\F e_ ffi All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. George Bender, PE, Assistant City Engineer Phone: 952-227-1164 (Publish in the Chanhassen Villager on September 13th &20th,2018) T. I I :tr 5!l gl r I r3 i,{ -- sl5!l -l 'it -;r6!t .-t t' "Fl .l '3t {ti*, j":Id:=)lr; l-r b .sqL lgqe l= Itlb l'rrs L3 !l -t 3rbl$. lB'P ;liizii J :, .il it6,3 ffi fZZ/_.7_)d*r _*-.\ _ BM&lMtMffiDEVgEwE ,.*dG-n,-da--'shJa '6i@hirdd-* ru-ldll-lokldlr. hi.^,Eo&*.t*a.d b&Esar $60ro!o tEE!-r--l ru,rm @Ig.t ^*r * Eil.-d--Qutll -t ror}-hdJ-- roll-Jl6:utLraELEdId-td-- kVdd4+l $u0!, lo fEtEf--- lruNM G:\ENGWacations\Arbor Glen 1 5-l 6 E@tE fr1 e[rreffi CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA DATE: September 24.2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-XX MOTION BY:SECONDED BY: RESOLUT'?ilIff#'ff":,:'"1f,?"#ilfi F1TX$LT3il'-^SEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, after two (2) weeks' published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before the hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation, the Chanhassen City Council has conducted a hearing to consider the vacation of the public drainage and utility easements legally described on the attached Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration ofthe proposed vacation, the Council has determined that it is in the public interest to vacate the public and drainage and utility easements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The public drainage and utility easements legally described on the attached Exhibit A are hereby vacated. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. The City Manager is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Carver County. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 24ft day of September, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager YES NO Denny Laufenburger, Mayor I 99038v1 ABSENT EXHIBIT ..A" to RESOLUTION NO.2018- A drainage and utility easement over, under and across the easterly 5.00 feet of the westJrly 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 15, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. (765 Crossroads Court-PIN 25.0840150) A drainage and utility easement over, under and across the westerly 5.00 feet of the easteily 10.00 feet, lying north of the south 10.00 feet and south of the north 10.00 feet, Lot 16, Block 1, ARBOR GLEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. (775 Crossroads Court-PIN 25.0840160) And I 99038v1 PIN TAX_NAME TAX_ADD-II TAX.ADD_I2 TAX_ADD-I3 SHAPE.STATEA0 252990040 GONYEA HOMES INC 1OOO BOONE AVE # 4OO GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55427-4473 9160 EAGLE CT 252460010 MEp2 LLC 17732 BALLANTRAE CtR EDEN PRATRTE MN ss347-3435 8950 CROSSROADS BLVD 250237607 STATE OF MINNESOTA. DOT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD 631 TRAN 5T PAUL MN 55155-1801 25O24T2OO STATE OF MINNESOTA - DNR 5OO LAFAYETTE RD ST PAUL MN 55155-4030 252480020 KRAUS-ANDERSON tNC 525 S 8TH ST MTNNEAPOLTS MN 55404-1030 8971 CROSSROADS BLVD 250840160 GOLF LAKE CONDOS LLC 5407 BURNT HICKORY DR VALRICO FL 33596-9204 775 CROSSROADS CT 257800390 SPRTNGFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSN 71OO NORTHLAND CIR N SUITE 3OO MINNEAPOLIS MN 55428-1583 258470030 LAURENE E FARRELL 801 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317-9161 801 LYMAN BLVD 252990030 THOMAS JUDE BEUTZ 8O9O MARSH DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9150 EAGLE CT 25847OO2O FRANK T & MARY LOU WHALEY 851 LYMAN BLVD CHANHASSEN MN 55317'9161 851. LYMAN BLVD 252990050 RYAN BOWLDS 9170 EAGLE CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9170 EAGLE CT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­44: Approval and Certification of Maximum Proposed Preliminary Levy to County Auditor Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: A­039W 2019 Budget PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council approves the Preliminary Levy of $11,019,868 for 2019 and Establishing the Truth­in­Taxation Hearing Date for 2018 as December 3rd, for Taxes Collectible in 2019." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND At the August 27, 2018 city council work session staff reviewed the detailed budget and three scenarios for setting the preliminary levy.At this evening’s meeting, staff will go through the attached PowerPoint presentation and each of the three scenarios.At the end of the discussion, the council will be asked to approve a preliminary levy which needs to be submitted to Carver County before September 30. Scenario #1: This scenario would be a total levy of $11,095,868, $182,000 (1.67%) more than final 2018 levy. This scenario included healthcare increases of 18%.We have now received the bids for our 2019 healthcare contract and that increase will be 8%.Therefore, there is no need to consider scenario #1 unless city council has an increased service level they would like to consider for 2019 ($76,000 above new growth). Scenario #2: This scenario would be a total levy of $11,019,868, an increase of $106,000 (0.97% new growth). Scenario #3:This scenario would be a total levy of $10,969,868, an increase from 2018 of $56,000 (0.51%).This scenario would require the reduction of expenditures or increase of budgeted revenues of $50,000 by the time we set the final levy in December ($50,000 below new growth). There are a number of items that still could significantly impact the final budget.Because of the possible significance of those unknowns, staff believes setting a preliminary levy lower than Scenario #2 would allow for less flexibility in setting the final budget for 2018. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the preliminary levy be set at Scenario #2.It is staff’s belief that this will provide the city the most flexibility in the event of significant or unplanned cost increases or fluctuations between now and December.It should be noted that the final levy established in December can only be set lower than the preliminary levy. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­44: Approval and Certification of Maximum Proposed Preliminary Levy toCounty AuditorSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.1.Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: A­039W 2019 BudgetPROPOSED MOTION"The City Council approves the Preliminary Levy of $11,019,868 for 2019 and Establishing the Truth­in­TaxationHearing Date for 2018 as December 3rd, for Taxes Collectible in 2019."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDAt the August 27, 2018 city council work session staff reviewed the detailed budget and three scenarios for setting thepreliminary levy.At this evening’s meeting, staff will go through the attached PowerPoint presentation and each of thethree scenarios.At the end of the discussion, the council will be asked to approve a preliminary levy which needs tobe submitted to Carver County before September 30.Scenario #1: This scenario would be a total levy of $11,095,868, $182,000 (1.67%) more than final 2018 levy.This scenario included healthcare increases of 18%.We have now received the bids for our 2019 healthcare contractand that increase will be 8%.Therefore, there is no need to consider scenario #1 unless city council has an increasedservice level they would like to consider for 2019 ($76,000 above new growth).Scenario #2: This scenario would be a total levy of $11,019,868, an increase of $106,000 (0.97% new growth).Scenario #3:This scenario would be a total levy of $10,969,868, an increase from 2018 of $56,000 (0.51%).Thisscenario would require the reduction of expenditures or increase of budgeted revenues of $50,000 by the time we setthe final levy in December ($50,000 below new growth).There are a number of items that still could significantly impact the final budget.Because of the possible significance ofthose unknowns, staff believes setting a preliminary levy lower than Scenario #2 would allow for less flexibility insetting the final budget for 2018.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the preliminary levy be set at Scenario #2.It is staff’s belief that this will provide the city the most flexibility in the event of significant or unplanned cost increases or fluctuations between now and December.It should be noted that the final levy established in December can only be set lower than the preliminary levy. ATTACHMENTS: Prelim Levy PPT Resolution Levy Impact Spreadhseet Gen Fund Budget Revolving Assessment Construction Fund Bond Tax Levies 201 9 Budget Assumptions •$106,000 (0.97%) increase in levy dollars due to new construction •A 8% increase in healthcare costs •Building permit revenue budgeted $100,000 higher than 2018 •A 3% increase for cost of living and merit pay. •Market adjustments for department heads •No increase in the police services contract •Elimination of the Crime Prevention Specialist position 201 9 Scenario #1 •LEVY –Scenario #1 would be a total levy of $11,095,868, $182,000 (1.67%) more than final 2018 levy. This scenario included healthcare increases of 18%. We have now received the bids for our 2019 healthcare contract and that increase will be 8%. Therefore, there is no need to consider scenario #1 unless city council has an increased service level they would like to consider for 2019. •POTENTIAL BUDGET IMPACT–This scenario would allow for all service levels to remain the same and potentially an increase to a service level if council desired. •RESIDENT IMPACT –The result of this levy would be an increase in the city portion of the average property tax bill of $6-$7. 201 9 Scenario #2 •LEVY –Scenario #2 would be a total levy of $11,019,868, an increase of $106,000 (0.97%), the amount of new growth for 2018. •POTENTIAL BUDGET IMPACT –This scenario would allow for all service levels to remain the same. •RESIDENT IMPACT –The result of this levy would be approximately the same property tax bill (city portion) on the average home. 201 9 Scenario #3 •LEVY –Scenario #3 would be a total levy of $10,969,868, an increase from 2018 of $56,000 (0.51%). This scenario would require the reduction of expenditures or increase of budgeted revenues of $50,000 by the time we set the final levy in December. •POTENTIAL BUDGET IMPACT -This scenario would have the potential for not all service levels remaining the same. •RESIDENT IMPACT –The result of this levy would be a $4-$5 decrease to the city portion of the property tax bill on the average home. 201 9 Gen Fund Budgeted Expenditures % Increase City Population 2017 2018 From 2017 Chanhassen 25,955 11,192,800 11,414,000 2.0% Chaska 26,941 15,043,932 16,841,385 9.3% Cottage Grove 36,399 19,839,100 20,160,615 1.6% Elk River 24,567 15,182,950 16,072,250 5.9% Inver Grove Heights 35,106 23,628,900 24,925,500 5.5% Lino Lakes 21,117 9,583,744 9,675,086 1.0% Prior Lake 25,735 12,141,543 12,651,813 4.2% Rosemount 23,965 12,836,600 13,566,000 5.7% Savage 30,713 14,521,627 14,948,819 2.9% Shakopee 41,519 24,253,200 26,928,100 11.0% Stillwater 19,748 14,270,848 14,966,044 5.1% Average 28,342 15,681,386 16,559,056 5.4% KFS General Fund Budgeted Expenditure Comparison 201 9 Per Capita City Spending 2018 Chanhassen 440 Chaska 625 Cottage Grove 554 Elk River 654 Inver Grove Heights 710 Lino Lakes 458 Prior Lake 492 Rosemount 566 Savage 487 Shakopee 649 Stillwater 758 Average 581 KFS General Fund Per Capita Spending Comparison 201 9 City 2018 Tax Rate** Chanhassen 22.666 Chaska 27.234 Victoria 31.495 Carver 47.703 Waconia 52.836 Mayer 50.612 Watertown 59.549 Norwood Young America 71.836 Cologne 67.952 New Germany 98.750 Hamburg 103.200 Average 57.621 ** Based on Urban Tax Rates Carver County Tax Rates 201 9 Hennepin County Tax Rates -2018 201 9 City Tax Rate**City Tax Rate** Medina 21.521 Mound 44.923 Wayzata 21.749 St. Louis Park 46.383 Chanhassen 22.666 Crystal 49.168 Plymouth 26.344 Robbinsdale 48.881 Minnetrista 25.742 Brooklyn Park 51.159 Edina 27.751 Rockford 52.999 Excelsior 27.133 Golden Valley 55.152 Shorewood 28.635 Richfield 57.730 Eden Prairie 32.348 New Hope 57.709 Minnetonka 35.710 Minneapolis 59.556 Maple Grove 36.709 Hopkins 66.293 Rogers 36.810 Osseo 63.157 Bloomington 40.573 Brooklyn Center 67.067 Champlin 39.704 AVERAGE 42.355 ** Based on Urban Tax Rates Recommendation Staff recommends setting a preliminary levy using Scenario #2 ($11,019,868, new growth) to allow for flexibility and planning before setting a final levy in December. 201 9 Thank You. 201 9 Thank you! CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: September 24, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018- MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY LEVY OF $11,019,868 FOR 2019, AND ESTABLISHING TRUTH-IN-TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR 2018, FOR TAXES COLLECTIBLE IN 2019 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the total preliminary levy to be certified to Carver County by September 30, 2018 is $11,019,868; and 2. That the preceding sums of money have been scheduled as “Proposed Levy Certification” to fund operations of the general fund, capital replacement fund, MSA fund and debt service funds to be levied in 2018 for collection in 2019 upon the taxable property in the City of Chanhassen as shown in this resolution; and 3. That the City Council of the City of Chanhassen determines that certain bonded indebtedness levies are hereby adopted to meet current and future bond requirements and that the County Auditor is hereby authorized and directed to increase or reduce the previously adopted bonded debt levies as shown on the attached Tax Levy Certification document; and 4. That the public meeting date will be set for December 3, 2018 and the budget and tax levy adoption will be set for December 10, 2018 as allowed by law; and 5. That the City of Chanhassen authorizes the County Auditor to certify the amounts as set forth in the attached Proposed Levy Certification document for purposes of preparing the Truth-in-Taxation notices. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2019 Budget 2018 2019 Dollar Percent OPERATIONAL & CAPITAL LEVY Levy Levy Change Change General Fund $8,704,333 $8,810,333 Capital Replacement Fund (for equipment) 800,000 800,000 Revolving Imp Street Reconstruction 384,838 381,223 Pavement Mgmt Fund (Sealcoating)93,000 93,000 Total Operational & Capital Levy 9,982,171 10,084,556 102,385 1.03% DEBT LEVY Public Works Facility 470,400 475,800 Library Referendum 461,297 459,512 Total Debt Levy 931,697 935,312 3,615 0.39% TOTAL TAX LEVY $10,913,868 $11,019,868 $106,000 0.97% Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Levy Levy Levy Taxes applied to:General Fund $8,886,333 $8,810,333 $8,760,333 Capital Replacement 800,000 800,000 800,000 Pavement Mgmt 93,000 93,000 93,000 Revolving Imp St Recon 381,223 381,223 381,223 Total Levy subject to levy limits $10,160,556 $10,084,556 $10,034,556 Library Referendum $475,800 $475,800 $475,800 Public Works Building 459,512 459,512 459,512 Total $11,095,868 $11,019,868 $10,969,868 Tax Generation Capacity (Not actual levy, Used only for estimating the impact on the average home) Prior Year $10,913,868 $10,913,868 $10,913,868 New Construction (0.97%)$106,000 $106,000 $106,000 Total Capacity $11,019,868 $11,019,868 $11,019,868 Percent Change (To avg home city prop tax) after New Growth 0.69%0.00%-0.45% Staff recommendation for final Levy TAX LEVY 2018 2019 % Change Operational & Capital Levies General Fund 8,704,333$ Capital Replacement 800,000 Revolving Imp Street Reconstruction 384,838 MSA (Sealcoating) 93,000 Total Operational & Capital Levies 9,982,171$ -$ -100.00% Debt Levies Public Works Facility 470,400 Library Referendum 461,297 Total Debt Levies 931,697$ -$ -100.00% Total All Levies 10,913,868$ -$ -100.00% 2019 Tax Levy Personal Materials Contractual Capital 2019 2018 %2017 Services & Supplies Services Outlay Total Total Change Actual General Government 1110 Legislative 46,700 - 81,600 - 128,300 126,500 1.42%122,613 1120 Administration 496,900 - 59,500 - 556,400 535,100 3.98%522,872 1130 Finance 329,000 200 42,300 - 371,500 358,700 3.57%339,100 1140 Legal - - 200,000 - 200,000 190,500 4.99%198,417 1150 Property Assessment - - 156,000 - 156,000 150,000 4.00%146,422 1160 MIS 167,100 44,700 46,000 - 257,800 234,800 9.80%223,613 1170 City Hall 93,500 40,300 262,000 - 395,800 413,800 -4.35%390,266 1180 Elections 26,000 4,000 18,000 - 48,000 42,600 12.68%- 1190 Library Building - 2,500 109,100 - 111,600 111,600 0.00%109,165 *Total 1,159,200 91,700 974,500 - 2,225,400 2,163,600 2.86%2,052,467 Law Enforcement 1210 Police Administration - 1,000 1,884,800 - 1,885,800 1,961,400 -3.85%1,804,236 1220 Fire Prevention & Admin 784,500 45,100 170,400 - 1,000,000 919,600 8.74%895,087 1250 Code Enforcement 722,600 6,400 13,200 - 742,200 718,100 3.36%736,784 1260 Community Service 53,700 1,700 5,800 - 61,200 66,400 -7.83%48,665 *Total 1,560,800 54,200 2,074,200 - 3,689,200 3,665,500 0.65%3,484,772 Public Works 1310 Engineering 649,000 800 26,900 - 676,700 681,300 -0.68%658,709 1320 Street Maintenance 873,300 113,300 35,400 - 1,022,000 996,900 2.52%931,096 1350 Street Lighting & Signals - 3,000 354,500 - 357,500 356,500 0.28%359,197 1370 Fleet Department 319,400 172,000 61,800 5,500 558,700 552,100 1.20%518,808 *Total 1,841,700 289,100 478,600 5,500 2,614,900 2,586,800 1.09%2,467,810 Community Development 1410 Planning Commission - 200 1,500 - 1,700 1,700 0.00%1,338 1420 Planning Administration 536,900 400 11,300 - 548,600 494,400 10.96%496,230 1430 Senior Commission 29,200 - 11,000 - 40,200 38,300 4.96%43,254 *Total 566,100 600 23,800 - 590,500 534,400 10.50%540,823 Park & Recreation 1510 Park & Rec Commission - 200 1,000 - 1,200 1,200 0.00%175 1520 Park & Rec Administration 250,600 200 6,000 - 256,800 245,600 4.56%233,149 1530 Recreation Center 233,200 17,700 95,900 - 346,800 346,200 0.17%312,419 1540 Lake Ann Park Operations 12,000 9,200 47,600 - 68,800 70,500 -2.41%67,573 1550 Park Maintenance 853,000 80,800 100,800 - 1,034,600 1,030,300 0.42%1,041,692 1560 Senior Citizens Center 84,700 4,300 32,700 - 121,700 114,100 6.66%117,940 1600 Recreation Programs 233,460 22,200 120,500 - 376,160 352,100 6.83%353,384 1700 Self-Supporting Programs 19,800 4,500 12,500 - 36,800 55,800 -34.05%50,614 1800 Recreation Sports 30,400 7,900 300 - 38,600 37,500 2.93%35,258 *Total 1,717,160 147,000 417,300 - 2,281,460 2,253,300 1.25%2,212,203 Total Operational Expenditures 6,844,960 582,600 3,968,400 5,500 11,401,460 11,203,600 1.77%10,758,075 Transfer for Roads - - - - **Total General Fund 11,401,460 11,203,600 1.77%10,758,075 Dollar Change from Previous Year 197,860 2019 General Fund Budget Expenditures 2016 2017 2018 2019 Inc Over 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget PY Budget Estimate General Property Tax 3010 Current Property Tax 8,000,093 8,475,905 8,704,333 8,810,333 1.2% 3002 Allowance for Delinquent Taxes (39,158) (75,108) (40,000) (55,000) 3011 Delinquent Property Tax 34,408 7,050 45,000 25,000 3090 Excess TIF Taxes 33,069 86,633 - - *Total General Property Tax 8,028,411 8,494,480 8,709,333 8,780,333 0.8%- Licenses 3203 Dog Kennel 500 250 500 500 500 3206 Massage License 600 150 800 500 500 3213 Solicitor - - - - - 3226 Liquor On and Off Sale 92,221 92,018 93,000 93,000 93,000 3284 Rubbish 2,400 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 *Total Licenses 95,721 95,418 97,800 97,500 -0.3%97,500 Permits 3301 Building 524,996 518,620 500,000 500,000 500,000 3302 Plan Check 252,621 253,777 235,000 235,000 235,000 3305 Heating & A/C 114,854 172,701 82,800 82,800 82,800 3306 Plumbing 92,927 97,615 65,000 65,000 65,000 3307 Trenching 40,641 55,066 30,000 30,000 30,000 3308 Hunting/Shooting 940 840 1,400 1,400 1,400 3309 Sprinkler 8,335 11,074 11,000 11,000 11,000 3311 Sign 8,590 4,015 6,500 6,500 6,500 3316 Septic Tank 1,560 - - - - 3320 Stable 200 200 300 300 300 3331 Firework's Application Fee 200 200 - - - 3390 Misc. Permits 3,410 5,525 3,000 3,000 3,000 *Total Permits 1,049,275 1,119,633 935,000 935,000 0.0%935,000 Fines & Penalties 3401 Traffic & Ordinance Violation 113,232 126,636 115,000 125,000 120,000 3402 Vehicle Lockouts 692 950 1,000 1,000 1,000 3404 Dog/Cat Impound 427 808 - 500 500 3405 Other Fines and Penalties 16 - - - - *Total Fines & Penalties 114,368 128,394 116,000 126,500 9.1%121,500 Intergovernmental Revenue 3503 Reimbursement from School Dist.47,056 49,407 47,000 50,000 50,000 3509 Other Shared Taxes 196,298 196,021 200,000 200,000 200,000 3510 Grants-State 162,175 163,912 162,000 162,000 162,000 3530 Grants-Federal - - - - - 3533 Grants-Other 692 6,291 - - - *Total Intergovernmental Revenue 406,222 415,632 409,000 412,000 0.7%412,000 2019 General Fund Budget Revenue 2016 2017 2018 2019 Inc Over 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget PY Budget Estimate Charges for Current Services 3601 Sale of Documents 863 950 500 800 800 3602 Use & Variance Permits 13,309 21,533 20,000 20,000 20,000 3603 Rezoning Fees 2,700 1,750 2,000 2,000 2,000 3604 Assessment Searches 15 - 300 - - 3605 Plat Recording Fees 1,650 2,290 4,000 4,000 4,000 3607 Election Filing Fees - - - - - 3613 Misc.-General Government 2,892 5,616 5,000 5,000 5,000 3614 Admin. Charge-2% Constr.56,079 52,225 55,000 55,000 55,000 3617 Engineering General 125 - - - - 3619 Investment Management Fee 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 3629 Misc.-Public Safety 9,465 9,971 10,000 10,000 10,000 3630 Recreation Program Fees 52,417 59,520 52,000 58,000 56,000 3631 Recreation Center 218,732 217,077 218,000 217,000 218,000 3633 Park Equipment Rental 57 93 300 100 100 3634 Park Facility Usage Fee 19,395 19,022 19,000 19,000 19,000 3635 Watercraft Rental 16,169 18,020 16,000 18,000 18,000 3636 Self-Supporting Programs 42,001 45,276 42,000 42,000 42,000 3637 Senior Programs 45,854 47,025 45,000 47,000 47,000 3638 Food Concessions 11,470 10,862 12,000 11,000 11,000 3639 Misc.-Park & Rec.905 1,347 1,200 1,200 1,200 3642 Recreation Sports 44,556 44,384 46,000 45,000 45,000 3649 Misc.-Public Works 4,646 3,651 2,000 3,500 3,500 3651 Merchandise Sales 3,702 2,950 2,400 2,800 2,800 *Total Charges for Current Services 622,000 638,562 627,700 636,400 1.4%635,400 Other Revenue 3801 Interest Earnings 27,080 36,120 30,000 50,000 45,000 3802 Equipment Rental & Sale 182,378 186,978 178,000 265,000 265,000 3803 Building Rental 6,692 5,798 6,500 6,000 6,000 3804 Land Sale 35,324 8,100 - - - 3807 Donations 24,275 28,609 25,267 27,227 25,000 3808 Insurance Reimbursements - 18,709 - - - 3816 SAC Retainer 3,404 4,386 4,000 4,000 4,000 3818 Sur-Tax Retainer 662 740 1,000 1,000 1,000 3820 Misc. Other Revenue 418 766 300 500 500 3903 Refunds/Reimbursements 60,805 55,635 63,700 60,000 60,000 3980 Cash Short/Over 0 1 - - - *Total Other Revenue 341,039 345,843 308,767 413,727 34.0%406,500 **Total General Fund Revenue 10,657,035 11,237,962 11,203,600 11,401,460 1.8%2,607,900 Total General Fund Expenditures 11,401,460 Net Levy Remaining (Use of Gen Fund Reserves)- 2019 General Fund Budget Revenue 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 28,800 42,000 42,000 43,600 3.8%43,600 4030 Contributions-Retirement 1,915 2,804 2,800 3,000 7.1%3,000 4050 Workers Compensation 106 90 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Personal Services 30,821 44,894 44,900 46,700 4.0%46,700 4300 Fees, Services 2,096 - 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 28,251 29,911 32,000 32,000 0.0%32,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 41,682 41,560 42,000 42,000 0.0%42,000 4370 Travel & Training 6,500 5,650 6,000 6,000 0.0%6,000 4375 Promotional Expenses 1,679 599 600 600 0.0%600 *Total Contractual Services 80,208 77,719 81,600 81,600 0.0%81,600 **Total Legislative 111,030 122,613 126,500 128,300 1.4%128,300 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Legislative (1110) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 374,858 360,011 362,000 377,300 4.2%388,600 4011 Overtime-Reg 2,503 - - - 0.0%- 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 231 209 300 300 0.0%300 4030 Contributions-Retirement 48,549 51,126 54,700 55,500 1.5%58,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 58,697 59,127 58,000 60,100 3.6%67,400 4050 Workers Compensation 2,995 3,045 3,500 3,700 5.7%3,900 *Total Personal Services 487,832 473,517 478,500 496,900 3.8%518,200 4300 Fees, Services 21,755 4,634 15,000 15,000 0.0%15,000 4310 Telephone 4,934 5,677 5,000 5,800 16.0%5,800 4320 Utilities 89 - 200 200 0.0%200 4330 Postage 21,641 22,968 21,000 23,000 9.5%23,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 220 - 300 300 0.0%300 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 4,221 4,633 4,500 4,600 2.2%4,600 4370 Travel & Training 6,834 9,503 8,600 8,600 0.0%8,600 4380 Mileage 837 1,079 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4410 Rental-Equipment 755 860 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4807 Property Tax Expense 4 - - - 0.0%- *Total Contractual Services 61,291 49,355 56,600 59,500 5.1%59,500 **Total Administration 549,123 522,872 535,100 556,400 4.0%577,700 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Adminstration (1120) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 218,028 226,932 224,600 239,500 6.6%246,700 4011 Overtime-Reg 156 - - - 0.0%- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 32,253 33,129 34,100 36,300 6.5%37,400 4040 Contributions-Insurance 29,734 38,281 48,000 50,900 6.0%57,000 4050 Workers Compensation 1,643 1,937 2,200 2,300 4.5%2,500 *Total Personal Services 281,814 300,279 308,900 329,000 6.5%343,600 4120 Supplies-Equipment - - 100 100 0.0%100 4210 Books & Periodicals - - 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Materials & Supplies - - 200 200 0.0%200 4300 Fees, Services 13,955 14,087 17,000 16,000 (5.9%)16,000 4301 Fees, Financial/Audit 21,599 19,147 26,000 20,000 (23.1%)21,000 4310 Telephone and Communications 972 997 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 241 200 600 300 (50.0%)300 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 465 465 500 500 0.0%500 4370 Travel & Training 4,037 3,926 4,500 4,500 0.0%4,500 *Total Contractual Services 41,269 38,821 49,600 42,300 (14.7%)43,300 **Total Finance 323,083 339,100 358,700 371,500 3.6%387,100 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Finance (1130) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4302 Fees, Legal 187,471 198,417 190,500 200,000 5.0%210,000 *Total Contractual Services 187,471 198,417 190,500 200,000 5.0%210,000 **Total Legal 187,471 198,417 190,500 200,000 5.0%210,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Legal (1140) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4300 Fees, Services 146,371 146,422 150,000 156,000 4.0%161,000 *Total Contractual Services 146,371 146,422 150,000 156,000 4.0%161,000 **Total Property Assessment 146,371 146,422 150,000 156,000 4.0%161,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Property Assessment (1150) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 125,068 112,230 116,300 123,800 6.4%127,500 4030 Contributions-Retirement 18,102 16,505 17,700 18,800 6.2%19,300 4040 Contributions-Insurance 17,384 19,697 22,800 23,300 2.2%26,200 4050 Workers Compensation 921 957 1,100 1,200 9.1%1,400 *Total Personal Services 161,475 149,389 157,900 167,100 5.8%174,400 4150 Maintenance Materials 1,264 1,062 1,300 1,300 0.0%1,300 4210 Books & Periodicals 40 55 300 100 (66.7%)100 4220 Software Licensing & Support 20,277 27,670 28,100 43,000 53.0%45,000 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 262 274 300 300 0.0%300 *Total Materials & Supplies 21,843 29,061 30,000 44,700 49.0%46,700 4300 Fees, Services 32,485 21,368 21,300 22,000 3.3%23,000 4310 Telephone and Communications 1,899 1,980 3,300 2,000 (39.4%)2,200 4320 Utilities 11,545 11,070 11,300 11,000 (2.7%)11,000 4370 Travel & Training 5,420 5,755 6,000 6,000 0.0%6,000 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 3,428 4,990 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 *Total Contractual Services 54,777 45,163 46,900 46,000 (1.9%)47,200 **Total MIS 238,095 223,613 234,800 257,800 9.8%268,300 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Management Information Systems (MIS) (1160) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 57,088 58,399 59,000 60,000 1.7%61,800 4011 Overtime-Reg 1,702 - 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 8,779 8,301 9,000 9,000 0.0%9,400 4040 Contributions-Insurance 8,977 14,691 18,300 19,300 5.5%21,700 4050 Workers Compensation 3,249 3,479 3,900 4,200 7.7%5,000 *Total Personal Services 79,795 84,870 91,200 93,500 2.5%98,900 4110 Supplies-Office 33,017 32,629 36,000 34,000 (5.6%)34,000 4120 Supplies-Equipment 629 176 900 900 0.0%900 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 699 411 300 500 66.7%500 4150 Maintenance Materials 5,554 4,250 4,000 4,500 12.5%4,500 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 7 144 400 400 0.0%400 *Total Materials & Supplies 39,907 37,611 41,600 40,300 (3.1%)40,300 4300 Fees, Services 11,495 11,166 6,500 11,000 69.2%11,000 4310 Telephone 10,413 10,357 11,000 11,000 0.0%11,000 4320 Utilities 41,055 37,768 42,000 39,000 (7.1%)39,000 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 29,847 29,201 30,000 30,000 0.0%30,000 4370 Travel & Training - - 200 200 0.0%200 4410 Rental-Equipment 12,236 14,442 14,500 14,500 0.0%14,500 4440 License & Registration 16 - 100 100 0.0%100 4483 Insurance-General Liability 141,936 141,675 163,000 150,000 (8.0%)150,000 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 3,548 12,932 9,500 1,000 (89.5%)1,000 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 132 - 200 200 0.0%200 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 4,951 10,245 4,000 5,000 25.0%5,000 *Total Contractual Services 255,630 267,785 281,000 262,000 (6.8%)262,000 **Total City Hall 375,331 390,266 413,800 395,800 (4.3%)401,200 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget City Hall (1170) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 29,581 - 24,000 26,000 8.3%26,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement - - 500 - (100.0%)- 4050 Workers Compensation - - 100 - (100.0%)- *Total Personal Services 29,581 - 24,600 26,000 5.7%26,000 4110 Supplies-Office 691 - 1,500 1,500 0.0%1,500 4120 Supplies-Equipment 40 - 2,500 2,500 0.0%2,500 *Total Materials & Supplies 732 - 4,000 4,000 0.0%4,000 4300 Fees, Services 8,052 - 8,000 12,000 50.0%12,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 208 - 2,500 1,000 (60.0%)1,000 4370 Travel & Training 6,299 - 3,500 5,000 42.9%5,000 *Total Contractual Services 14,560 - 14,000 18,000 28.6%18,000 **Total Elections 44,873 - 42,600 48,000 12.7%48,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Elections (1180) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4150 Maintenance Materials 2,105 2,333 2,500 2,500 0.0%2,500 *Total Materials & Supplies 2,105 2,333 2,500 2,500 0.0%2,500 4300 Fees, Services 7,216 3,258 2,000 3,000 50.0%3,000 4310 Telephone 1,526 1,526 1,600 1,600 0.0%1,600 4320 Utilities 61,902 56,908 63,000 63,000 0.0%63,000 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 28,723 29,304 34,000 30,500 (10.3%)30,500 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 7,050 10,274 5,000 6,500 30.0%6,500 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 3,432 5,562 3,500 4,500 28.6%4,500 *Total Contractual Services 109,850 106,832 109,100 109,100 0.0%109,100 **Total Library Building 111,954 109,165 111,600 111,600 0.0%111,600 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Library Building (1190) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 23,910 5,209 47,400 - (100.0%)- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 2,710 766 7,200 - (100.0%)- 4040 Contributions-Insurance 3,806 1,442 18,900 - (100.0%)- 4050 Workers Compensation 171 45 400 - (100.0%)- *Total Personal Services 30,597 7,463 73,900 - (100.0%)- 4130 Program Supplies 475 313 2,500 1,000 (60.0%)1,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 475 313 2,500 1,000 (60.0%)1,000 4300 Fees, Services 1,683,764 1,795,040 1,882,700 1,882,700 0.0%1,967,500 4370 Travel & Training 173 15 300 100 (66.7%)100 4375 Promotional Expense 1,838 1,405 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 *Total Contractual Services 1,685,775 1,796,460 1,885,000 1,884,800 (0.0%)1,969,600 **Total Police Administration 1,716,848 1,804,236 1,961,400 1,885,800 (3.9%)1,970,600 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Police Administration (1210) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 191,863 217,749 195,400 217,000 11.1%223,600 4011 Overtime-Reg - 292 1,000 3,000 200.0%3,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 124,317 153,469 167,500 200,000 19.4%210,000 4022 Training Wages 41,344 - - - 0.0%- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 187,866 222,858 220,000 230,000 4.5%240,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 24,098 25,335 22,200 23,500 5.9%26,200 4050 Workers Compensation 51,330 71,572 58,000 75,000 29.3%78,000 4060 Unemployment 162 439 - - 0.0%- 4070 Contracted Wages 31,696 34,048 35,000 36,000 2.9%37,000 *Total Personal Services 652,675 725,763 699,100 784,500 12.2%817,800 4120 Supplies-Equipment 5,859 6,994 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 4130 Supplies-Program 477 3,073 2,000 2,200 10.0%2,200 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 9,485 6,943 9,000 9,000 0.0%9,000 4150 Maintenance Materials 403 1 500 400 (20.0%)400 4210 Books & Periodicals - - 600 500 (16.7%)500 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 11,992 9,044 11,000 11,000 0.0%11,000 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 1,770 4,924 8,000 8,000 0.0%8,000 4290 Misc. Materials & Supplies 4,541 3,642 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 34,526 34,620 45,100 45,100 0.0%45,100 4300 Fees, Services 24,444 29,088 32,000 32,000 0.0%32,000 4310 Telephone 8,426 8,541 7,200 8,000 11.1%8,000 4320 Utilities 16,542 15,464 22,000 16,000 (27.3%)16,000 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 4,914 4,469 5,000 5,100 2.0%5,100 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 1,648 1,327 2,500 2,000 (20.0%)2,000 4370 Travel & Training 21,084 40,072 41,500 41,500 0.0%41,500 4375 Promotional Expense 6,506 6,922 10,000 10,000 0.0%10,000 4483 Insurance-General Liability 685 734 1,200 800 (33.3%)1,000 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 7,874 5,775 5,500 5,500 0.0%5,500 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 1,100 1,909 7,000 7,000 0.0%7,000 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 19,968 20,338 19,500 20,500 5.1%20,500 4531 Repair & Maintenance-Radios 297 63 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 Contribution for Performance 34,521 - 20,000 20,000 0.0%30,000 *Total Contractual Services 148,009 134,704 175,400 170,400 (2.9%)180,600 **Total Fire Prevention and Admin 835,210 895,087 919,600 1,000,000 8.7%1,043,500 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Fire Prevention and Administration (1220) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 508,082 537,534 504,000 518,200 2.8%533,800 4011 Overtime-Reg 289 82 - - 0.0%- 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 16,307 14,490 20,000 18,000 (10.0%)18,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 74,422 75,207 78,000 78,500 0.6%84,200 4040 Contributions-Insurance 84,469 96,731 92,000 103,700 12.7%116,900 4050 Workers Compensation 4,059 3,575 4,500 4,200 (6.7%)4,800 *Total Personal Services 687,628 727,619 698,500 722,600 3.5%757,700 4120 Supplies-Equipment 186 - 100 100 0.0%100 4130 Supplies-Program 409 877 900 900 0.0%900 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 2,722 279 2,700 2,000 (25.9%)2,000 4210 Books & Periodicals 1,129 77 1,500 1,500 0.0%1,500 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 1,197 956 1,000 1,500 50.0%1,500 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 99 344 400 400 0.0%400 *Total Materials & Supplies 5,742 2,534 6,600 6,400 (3.0%)6,400 4310 Telephone 2,827 2,535 4,500 4,500 0.0%4,500 4340 Printing & Publishing - - 1,500 1,000 (33.3%)1,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 724 761 800 1,000 25.0%1,000 4370 Travel & Training 4,541 3,336 4,500 5,000 11.1%5,000 4440 License & Registration 530 - 500 500 0.0%500 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 207 - 300 300 0.0%300 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 92 - 900 900 0.0%900 *Total Contractual Services 8,922 6,632 13,000 13,200 1.5%13,200 **Total Code Enforcement 702,293 736,784 718,100 742,200 3.4%777,300 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Code Enforcement (1250) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 43,007 35,473 49,500 45,500 (8.1%)48,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 203 289 200 300 50.0%300 4030 Contributions-Retirement 6,623 4,576 7,000 6,000 (14.3%)6,500 4040 Contributions-Insurance 541 321 700 600 (14.3%)600 4050 Workers Compensation 1,121 1,115 1,300 1,300 0.0%1,500 4060 Unemployment - 527 - - 0.0%- *Total Personal Services 51,495 42,302 58,700 53,700 (8.5%)56,900 4120 Supplies-Equipment 193 175 300 300 0.0%300 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 1,604 17 700 700 0.0%700 4240 Uniforms & Clothing - 801 700 700 0.0%700 *Total Materials & Supplies 1,797 993 1,700 1,700 0.0%1,700 4300 Fees, Services 2,677 4,126 2,800 3,200 14.3%3,400 4310 Telephone 1,615 1,229 1,700 1,600 (5.9%)1,600 4340 Printing & Publishing 697 16 600 100 (83.3%)100 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships - - 200 200 0.0%200 4370 Travel & Training - - 200 200 0.0%200 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 73 - 200 200 0.0%200 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip - - 100 100 0.0%100 4531 Repair & Maintenance-Radios - - 200 200 0.0%200 *Total Contractual Services 5,062 5,370 6,000 5,800 (3.3%)6,000 **Total Community Service 58,355 48,665 66,400 61,200 (7.8%)64,600 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Community Service (1260) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 479,255 464,860 462,300 467,000 1.0%481,000 4011 Overtime-Reg 5,229 6,157 5,500 6,000 9.1%6,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 5,790 13,897 13,000 14,000 7.7%16,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 126 - - - 0.0%- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 72,025 68,941 70,000 70,700 1.0%74,700 4040 Contributions-Insurance 62,895 80,702 96,900 87,300 (9.9%)97,700 4050 Workers Compensation 3,942 3,588 4,800 4,000 (16.7%)4,500 *Total Personal Services 629,261 638,144 652,500 649,000 (0.5%)679,900 4120 Supplies-Equipment 262 21 1,000 500 (50.0%)500 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 212 10 300 300 0.0%300 4210 Books & Periodicals 369 - - - 0.0%- *Total Materials & Supplies 843 32 1,300 800 (38.5%)800 4300 Fees, Services 14,593 10,822 16,000 16,000 0.0%16,000 4310 Telephone 3,614 3,915 3,400 4,000 17.6%4,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 140 292 500 300 (40.0%)300 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 1,503 1,383 1,500 1,500 0.0%1,500 4370 Travel & Training 4,444 3,971 4,500 4,500 0.0%4,500 4380 Mileage 95 149 100 100 0.0%100 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip - - 1,500 500 (66.7%)500 *Total Contractual Services 24,389 20,533 27,500 26,900 (2.2%)26,900 **Total Engineering 654,493 658,709 681,300 676,700 (0.7%)707,600 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Engineering (1310) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 465,380 489,181 531,400 543,100 2.2%559,400 4011 Overtime-Reg 31,835 27,554 26,000 27,000 3.8%30,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 18,525 24,366 28,000 28,000 0.0%28,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 327 428 - - 0.0%- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 74,870 77,435 80,500 82,300 2.2%84,800 4040 Contributions-Insurance 88,894 100,282 123,500 126,900 2.8%142,300 4050 Workers Compensation 45,866 59,215 64,000 66,000 3.1%70,000 4060 Unemployment 4,911 3,328 - - 0.0%- *Total Personal Services 730,608 781,789 853,400 873,300 2.3%914,500 4120 Supplies-Equipment 32,557 43,237 45,000 45,000 0.0%45,000 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 8,264 18,263 10,000 12,000 20.0%12,000 4150 Maintenance Materials 46,265 33,014 50,000 48,000 (4.0%)48,000 4210 Books & Periodicals - - 100 100 0.0%100 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 5,438 5,439 5,000 5,500 10.0%5,500 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 2,733 2,758 2,500 2,700 8.0%2,700 *Total Materials & Supplies 95,257 102,710 112,600 113,300 0.6%113,300 4300 Fees, Services 3,256 9,353 2,500 3,500 40.0%3,500 4310 Telephone 4,120 5,128 5,200 5,200 0.0%5,200 4340 Printing & Publishing - 63 300 300 0.0%300 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 969 2,051 1,000 2,000 100.0%2,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships - - 200 200 0.0%200 4370 Travel & Training 1,377 1,589 1,600 1,600 0.0%1,600 4410 Rental-Equipment 844 8,383 1,000 3,000 200.0%3,000 4440 License & Registration 513 5 500 500 0.0%500 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building - 450 100 100 0.0%100 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 756 200 1,000 800 (20.0%)800 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 500 650 1,500 700 (53.3%)700 4540 Repair & Maintenance-Streets 6,757 6,875 5,000 6,500 30.0%6,500 4560 Repair & Maintenance-Signs 8,621 11,850 11,000 11,000 0.0%12,000 *Total Contractual Services 27,712 46,597 30,900 35,400 14.6%36,400 **Total Street Maintenance 853,577 931,096 996,900 1,022,000 2.5%1,064,200 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Street Maintenance (1320) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4120 Supplies-Equipment 2,785 4,679 2,000 3,000 50.0%3,500 *Total Materials & Supplies 2,785 4,679 2,000 3,000 50.0%3,500 4300 Fees, Services - 2,166 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4310 Telephone 360 360 500 500 0.0%500 4320 Utilities 326,178 320,328 329,000 323,000 (1.8%)323,000 4565 Repair & Maintenance-Light/Signal 30,239 31,664 24,000 30,000 25.0%33,000 *Total Contractual Services 356,778 354,518 354,500 354,500 0.0%357,500 **Total Street Lighting and Signals 359,562 359,197 356,500 357,500 0.3%361,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Street Lighting and Signals (1350) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 198,243 206,685 210,800 217,100 3.0%223,700 4011 Overtime-Reg 5,514 4,771 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 1,129 4,182 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 29,259 30,569 32,000 33,000 3.1%34,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 36,597 40,026 47,200 48,300 2.3%54,200 4050 Workers Compensation 8,927 9,266 11,400 11,000 (3.5%)13,000 *Total Personal Services 279,669 295,498 311,400 319,400 2.6%334,900 4120 Supplies-Equipment 1,638 1,610 2,000 2,000 0.0%2,000 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 82 48 600 200 (66.7%)200 4150 Maintenance Materials 1,147 113 600 600 0.0%600 4170 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 110,112 144,222 170,000 165,000 (2.9%)165,000 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 1,003 1,055 1,200 1,200 0.0%1,200 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 2,848 2,605 3,000 3,000 0.0%3,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 116,829 149,654 177,400 172,000 (3.0%)172,000 4300 Fees, Services 5,664 4,798 2,500 5,000 100.0%5,000 4310 Telephone 2,456 2,432 3,000 2,500 (16.7%)2,500 4320 Utilities 31,170 32,540 32,000 32,000 0.0%32,000 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 4,825 5,145 5,500 5,500 0.0%5,500 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 37 40 200 200 0.0%200 4370 Travel & Training 118 691 800 800 0.0%800 4440 License & Registration 93 - 300 300 0.0%300 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 9,007 12,451 10,000 12,000 20.0%12,000 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 2,447 8,798 3,500 3,500 0.0%3,500 4933 Sales Tax 141 - - - 0.0%- *Total Contractual Services 55,958 66,895 57,800 61,800 6.9%61,800 4703 Office Equipment - - 500 500 0.0%500 4705 Other Equipment 4,743 6,761 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 *Total Capital Outlay 4,743 6,761 5,500 5,500 0.0%5,500 **Total Fleet Department 457,199 518,808 552,100 558,700 1.2%574,200 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Fleet Department (1370) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4210 Books & Periodicals - - 200 200 0.0%200 *Total Materials & Supplies - - 200 200 0.0%200 4340 Printing & Publishing 1,149 1,090 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships - - 200 200 0.0%200 4370 Travel & Training 11 249 300 300 0.0%300 *Total Contractual Services 1,160 1,338 1,500 1,500 0.0%1,500 **Total Planning Commission 1,160 1,338 1,700 1,700 0.0%1,700 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Planning Commission (1410) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 320,925 339,898 353,000 403,400 14.3%415,500 4011 Overtime-Reg 1,348 - - - 0.0%- 4030 Contributions-Retirement 45,870 48,624 53,500 61,000 14.0%63,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 56,502 62,321 73,000 68,700 (5.9%)77,000 4050 Workers Compensation 2,390 2,860 3,200 3,800 18.8%4,200 *Total Personal Services 427,035 453,704 482,700 536,900 11.2%559,700 4120 Supplies-Equipment 97 62 300 300 0.0%300 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 22 441 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Materials & Supplies 118 503 400 400 0.0%400 4300 Fees, Services 2,270 37,392 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 408 909 800 800 0.0%800 4370 Travel & Training 5,083 3,722 5,500 5,500 0.0%5,500 *Total Contractual Services 7,762 42,024 11,300 11,300 0.0%11,300 **Total Planning Administration 434,915 496,230 494,400 548,600 11.0%571,400 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Planning Administration (1420) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 20,907 21,852 22,100 22,600 2.3%23,300 4030 Contributions-Retirement 3,074 3,220 3,400 3,500 2.9%3,500 4040 Contributions-Insurance 2,267 2,481 2,900 2,900 0.0%3,200 4050 Workers Compensation 155 182 200 200 0.0%200 *Total Personal Services 26,403 27,735 28,600 29,200 2.1%30,200 4300 Fees, Services 9,010 14,240 9,000 10,000 11.1%14,000 4370 Travel & Training - 295 200 200 0.0%200 4375 Promotional Expense 320 984 500 800 60.0%800 *Total Contractual Services 9,329 15,519 9,700 11,000 13.4%15,000 **Total Senior Commission 35,733 43,254 38,300 40,200 5.0%45,200 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Senior Commission (1430) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4130 Supplies-Program - - 100 100 0.0%100 4210 Books & Periodicals - - 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Materials & Supplies - - 200 200 0.0%200 4340 Printing & Publishing - - 100 100 0.0%100 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships - - 500 500 0.0%500 4370 Travel & Training 325 175 400 400 0.0%400 *Total Contractual Services 325 175 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 **Total Park and Rec Commission 325 175 1,200 1,200 0.0%1,200 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Park and Recreation Commission (1510) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 161,579 172,863 174,500 182,300 4.5%187,700 4030 Contributions-Retirement 23,446 25,112 26,400 27,600 4.5%28,400 4040 Contributions-Insurance 23,414 26,993 37,000 38,900 5.1%43,700 4050 Workers Compensation 1,195 1,452 1,600 1,800 12.5%2,000 *Total Personal Services 209,635 226,420 239,500 250,600 4.6%261,800 4120 Supplies-Equipment - 16 100 100 0.0%100 4130 Supplies-Program - - 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Materials & Supplies - 16 200 200 0.0%200 4300 Fees, Services - 828 200 300 50.0%300 4310 Telephone 721 617 900 700 (22.2%)700 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 2,903 3,448 2,900 3,100 6.9%3,100 4370 Travel & Training 1,225 1,821 1,800 1,800 0.0%1,800 4380 Mileage - - 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Contractual Services 4,849 6,713 5,900 6,000 1.7%6,000 **Total Park and Rec Admin.214,483 233,149 245,600 256,800 4.6%268,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Park and Recreation Administration (1520) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 61,765 64,313 66,400 68,100 2.6%70,200 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 101,768 97,000 115,000 113,000 (1.7%)115,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 24,105 24,008 28,500 30,000 5.3%32,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 8,995 9,848 11,300 11,600 2.7%13,000 4050 Workers Compensation 6,869 9,909 8,200 10,500 28.0%11,000 *Total Personal Services 203,502 205,079 229,400 233,200 1.7%241,200 4120 Supplies-Equipment 726 1,358 2,000 1,600 (20.0%)1,800 4130 Supplies-Program 14,846 13,066 20,000 15,000 (25.0%)16,000 4150 Maintenance Materials 237 450 500 500 0.0%500 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 438 631 500 600 20.0%600 *Total Materials & Supplies 16,248 15,505 23,000 17,700 (23.0%)18,900 4300 Fees, Services 59,162 50,812 50,000 52,000 4.0%54,000 4310 Telephone 617 917 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4320 Utilities 33,875 35,409 37,000 37,000 0.0%37,000 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 348 351 300 400 33.3%400 4370 Travel & Training 275 15 400 400 0.0%400 4375 Promotional Expense 654 700 800 800 0.0%800 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 3,659 1,978 2,500 2,500 0.0%2,500 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 1,532 1,653 1,800 1,800 0.0%1,800 *Total Contractual Services 100,123 91,834 93,800 95,900 2.2%97,900 **Total Recreation Center 319,873 312,419 346,200 346,800 0.2%358,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Recreation Center (1530) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 9,110 8,164 10,700 10,700 0.0%11,500 4030 Contributions-Retirement 697 625 900 700 (22.2%)700 4050 Workers Compensation 289 500 600 600 0.0%700 *Total Personal Services 10,096 9,288 12,200 12,000 (1.6%)12,900 4130 Supplies-Program 8,433 10,477 9,000 9,000 0.0%9,000 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 200 200 200 200 0.0%200 *Total Materials & Supplies 8,633 10,677 9,200 9,200 0.0%9,200 4300 Fees, Services 32,349 35,341 34,500 35,000 1.4%36,000 4310 Telephone 1,145 1,288 1,200 1,200 0.0%1,200 4320 Utilities 12,947 10,765 13,000 11,000 (15.4%)11,000 4340 Printing & Publishing 428 214 400 400 0.0%400 *Total Contractual Services 46,868 47,607 49,100 47,600 (3.1%)48,600 **Total Lake Ann Park Operations 65,597 67,573 70,500 68,800 (2.4%)70,700 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Lake Ann Park Operations (1540) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 479,890 489,295 490,400 482,000 (1.7%)497,000 4011 Overtime-Reg 32,631 32,956 25,000 30,000 20.0%32,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 114,904 112,282 121,000 118,000 (2.5%)120,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 5,211 3,829 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 85,025 83,513 88,000 88,000 0.0%90,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 76,977 78,394 87,000 91,000 4.6%102,200 4050 Workers Compensation 26,127 36,995 32,000 39,000 21.9%42,000 4060 Unemployment 864 - - - 0.0%- *Total Personal Services 821,630 837,263 848,400 853,000 0.5%888,200 4120 Supplies-Equipment 38,744 45,221 40,000 40,000 0.0%40,000 4140 Supplies-Vehicles 2,852 11,122 3,000 5,000 66.7%5,000 4150 Maintenance Materials 26,479 21,561 30,000 27,000 (10.0%)27,000 4151 Irrigation Materials 3,200 3,967 5,000 5,000 0.0%5,000 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 1,295 2,453 2,200 2,600 18.2%2,600 4260 Small Tools & Equipment 2,822 2,032 600 1,200 100.0%1,200 *Total Materials & Supplies 75,393 86,356 80,800 80,800 0.0%80,800 4300 Fees, Services 28,322 52,825 43,000 43,000 0.0%43,000 4310 Telephone 4,512 5,813 5,100 5,900 15.7%5,900 4320 Utilities 4,584 4,796 5,000 4,800 (4.0%)4,800 4340 Printing & Publishing - 105 200 200 0.0%200 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 3,474 3,591 4,000 3,700 (7.5%)3,700 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 10 - 400 400 0.0%400 4370 Travel & Training 501 2,537 600 1,000 66.7%1,000 4400 Rental-Land & Buildings 29,347 29,984 34,000 36,000 5.9%36,000 4410 Rental-Equipment 250 1,274 700 700 0.0%700 4440 License & Registration 429 44 300 300 0.0%300 4510 Repair & Maintenance-Building 759 5,073 1,700 1,700 0.0%1,700 4520 Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles - 2,387 100 100 0.0%100 4530 Repair & Maintenance-Equip 640 8,889 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4560 Repair & Maintenance-Signs 2,093 754 5,000 2,000 (60.0%)2,000 *Total Contractual Services 74,921 118,073 101,100 100,800 (0.3%)100,800 4705 Other Equipment 977 - - - 0.0%- *Total Capital Outlay 977 - - - 0.0%- **Total Park Maintenance 972,921 1,041,692 1,030,300 1,034,600 0.4%1,069,800 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 Rental-Land & Buildings Increase in portable restroom contract 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Park Maintenance (1550) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 44,535 64,425 66,000 56,200 (14.8%)57,900 4030 Contributions-Retirement 6,720 9,772 10,000 8,600 (14.0%)8,800 4040 Contributions-Insurance 295 3,536 3,500 19,300 451.4%21,700 4050 Workers Compensation 339 535 600 600 0.0%600 *Total Personal Services 51,889 78,268 80,100 84,700 5.7%89,000 4120 Supplies-Equipment 56 41 300 300 0.0%300 4130 Supplies-Program 2,483 4,431 4,000 4,000 0.0%4,000 *Total Materials & Supplies 2,540 4,472 4,300 4,300 0.0%4,300 4300 Fees, Services 30,856 34,713 29,000 32,000 10.3%33,000 4350 Cleaning & Waste Removal 95 95 100 100 0.0%100 4360 Subscriptions & Memberships 107 110 100 100 0.0%100 4370 Travel & Training 99 222 300 300 0.0%300 4375 Promotional Expense - 60 100 100 0.0%100 4380 Mileage - - 100 100 0.0%100 *Total Contractual Services 31,157 35,200 29,700 32,700 10.1%33,700 **Total Senior Citizens Center 85,585 117,940 114,100 121,700 6.7%127,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Senior Citizens Center (1560) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 98,490 103,215 105,300 121,860 15.7%125,500 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 56,230 64,368 71,000 68,000 (4.2%)71,000 4021 Overtime-Temp 1,272 402 1,000 1,000 0.0%1,000 4030 Contributions-Retirement 19,207 20,434 22,000 24,000 9.1%26,000 4040 Contributions-Insurance 10,026 10,720 12,000 13,600 13.3%14,900 4050 Workers Compensation 3,045 4,802 3,600 5,000 38.9%5,400 *Total Personal Services 188,269 203,942 214,900 233,460 8.6%243,800 4120 Supplies-Equipment 2,321 2,019 2,500 2,500 0.0%2,500 4130 Supplies-Program 15,524 22,063 17,000 18,000 5.9%18,000 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 1,575 2,035 1,600 1,700 6.3%1,700 *Total Materials & Supplies 19,420 26,117 21,100 22,200 5.2%22,200 4300 Fees, Services 61,653 65,606 64,000 66,600 4.1%66,600 4310 Telephone 2,140 2,155 2,700 2,200 (18.5%)2,200 4320 Utilities 3,718 4,660 4,000 4,600 15.0%4,600 4340 Printing & Publishing 9,409 9,683 6,600 7,500 13.6%8,000 4370 Travel & Training 414 507 500 500 0.0%500 4380 Mileage - - 100 100 0.0%100 4400 Rental-Land & Buildings 5,999 8,303 6,200 7,000 12.9%7,000 4410 Rental-Equipment 25,108 32,412 32,000 32,000 0.0%32,000 *Total Contractual Services 108,439 123,325 116,100 120,500 3.8%121,000 **Total Recreation Programs 316,128 353,384 352,100 376,160 6.8%387,000 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Recreation Programs (1600) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4010 Salaries & Wages-Reg 24,624 25,806 26,300 13,600 (48.3%)14,000 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 1,950 1,950 2,400 2,200 (8.3%)2,200 4030 Contributions-Retirement 3,851 4,020 4,200 2,100 (50.0%)2,200 4040 Contributions-Insurance 2,472 2,645 3,000 1,500 (50.0%)1,600 4050 Workers Compensation 267 337 400 400 0.0%400 *Total Personal Services 33,164 34,757 36,300 19,800 (45.5%)20,400 4130 Supplies-Program 4,142 4,283 4,500 4,500 0.0%4,500 *Total Materials & Supplies 4,142 4,283 4,500 4,500 0.0%4,500 4300 Fees, Services 11,766 11,573 15,000 12,500 (16.7%)13,000 *Total Contractual Services 11,766 11,573 15,000 12,500 (16.7%)13,000 **Total Self-Supporting Programs 49,071 50,614 55,800 36,800 (34.1%)37,900 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Self-Supporting Programs (1700) 2018 to 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2020 Account Description Actual Actual Budget Budget % Inc/(Dec)Estimate 4020 Salaries & Wages-Temp 21,370 23,393 25,500 26,000 2.0%26,500 4030 Contributions-Retirement 2,302 2,438 2,700 2,800 3.7%2,800 4050 Workers Compensation 899 1,481 1,100 1,600 45.5%1,700 *Total Personal Services 24,571 27,311 29,300 30,400 3.8%31,000 4120 Supplies-Equipment - 82 - - 0.0%- 4130 Supplies-Program 3,309 2,438 2,500 2,500 0.0%2,500 4240 Uniforms & Clothing 4,852 5,427 5,400 5,400 0.0%5,400 *Total Materials & Supplies 8,161 7,947 7,900 7,900 0.0%7,900 4375 Promotional Expenses - - 300 300 0.0%- *Total Contractual Services - - 300 300 0.0%- **Total Recreation Sports 32,732 35,258 37,500 38,600 2.9%38,900 SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE 2019 2020 2019 General Fund Budget Recreation Sports (1800) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Project Cost2,752,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 1,900,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Assessments 40%(1,300,000) (640,000) (400,000) (760,000) (480,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) City Share1,452,000 960,000 600,000 1,140,000 720,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Fund Bal - BOY5,366,920 2,969,119 1,406,444 530,959 (852,499) (1,430,633) (1,742,535) (1,996,830) (1,980,433) (1,932,321) (2,030,453) Levy210,720 (269,986) (260,313) 107,595 107,370 105,390 105,990 334,790 334,690 336,190 610,090 Repayment57,000 266,347 369,363 433,777 556,164 633,461 697,875 739,289 769,703 624,817 586,168 Less Prepaid SpecialsProject Costs(2,752,000) (1,600,000) (1,000,000) (1,900,000) (1,200,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) (1,000,000) Investable Balance2,882,640 1,365,480 515,494 (827,668) (1,388,964) (1,691,782) (1,938,670) (1,922,751) (1,876,040) (1,971,314) (1,834,195) Interest86,479 40,964 15,465 (24,830) (41,669) (50,753) (58,160) (57,683) (56,281) (59,139) (55,026) Fund Bal - EOY 5,366,920 2,969,119 1,406,444 530,959 (852,499) (1,430,633) (1,742,535) (1,996,830) (1,980,433) (1,932,321) (2,030,453) (1,889,221) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 $142,000.00 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 $34,000.00 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007$209,346.73 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008$103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009$64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 2010$122,387.32 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011$77,297.25 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 64,414 $64,414.38 64,414 $64,414.38Revolving Assessment FundAssessed Share Financed Thru City 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Project Cost2,752,000 1,600,000 1,000,000 1,900,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Assessments 40%(1,300,000) (640,000) (400,000) (760,000) (480,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) (400,000) City Share1,452,000 960,000 600,000 1,140,000 720,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Fund Bal - BOY5,366,920 2,969,119 2,065,644 1,515,780 772,166 438,611 216,610 (11,433) (34,344) (93,064) (367,581) Levy210,720 (269,986) (260,313) 107,595 107,370 105,390 105,990 334,790 334,690 336,190 610,090 Repayment57,000 266,347 266,300 266,300 266,300 266,300 266,300 243,300 209,300 - - Less Prepaid SpecialsProject Costs(2,752,000) (960,000) (600,000) (1,140,000) (720,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) Investable Balance2,882,640 2,005,480 1,471,631 749,675 425,836 210,301 (11,100) (33,343) (90,354) (356,874) (357,491) Interest86,479 60,164 44,149 22,490 12,775 6,309 (333) (1,000) (2,711) (10,706) (10,725) Fund Bal - EOY 5,366,920 2,969,119 2,065,644 1,515,780 772,166 438,611 216,610 (11,433) (34,344) (93,064) (367,581) (368,215) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 $142,000.00 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 $34,000.00 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007$209,346.73 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 20082009201020112012Revolving Assessment FundAssessed Share Financed Thru Bond Sale & New Facilities 2005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Project Cost1,700,000 950,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 Assessments 40% (680,000) (380,000) (560,000) (480,000) (480,000) (520,000) (520,000) (520,000) (560,000) (560,000) (560,000) (600,000) City Share1,020,000 570,000 840,000 720,000 720,000 780,000 780,000 780,000 840,000 840,000 840,000 900,000 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2012**** 1,133,539 385,450 312,580 59,256 145,403 79,123 127,321 202,858 235,790 174,993 84,551 496,492 Levy437,842 130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 1,114,690 1,111,790 Repayment627,842 737,346 775,540 831,720 699,717 673,951 705,336 666,687 673,128 653,803 682,789 682,789 Project Costs(1,825,000) (950,000) (1,475,000) (1,200,000) (1,200,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) (1,300,000) (1,400,000) (1,400,000) (1,400,000) (1,500,000) Investable Balance 374,223 303,476 57,530 141,168 76,818 123,612 196,949 228,922 169,896 82,089 482,031 791,071 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest11,227 9,104 1,726 4,235 2,305 3,708 5,908 6,868 5,097 2,463 14,461 23,732 Fund Bal - EOY385,450 312,580 59,256 145,403 79,123 127,321 202,858 235,790 174,993 84,551 496,492 814,803 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 23,000 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 $122,387.00 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 $77,297.00 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$109,504.44 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013$61,193.66 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 61,194 2014$90,180.13 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$77,297.25 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2016$77,297.25 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2017$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2018$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 2019$83,738.69 83,738 83,738 83,738 2020$90,180.13 90,180 90,180 2021$90,180.13 90,180 2022$90,180.1320232024202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,500,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (600,000) (640,000) (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 900,000 960,000 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 814,803 1,160,714 1,426,550 1,715,425 1,931,828 2,173,640 2,339,096 1,109,990 1,109,290 1,104,590 1,106,490 1,099,090 1,098,590 1,098,590 702,114 714,997 734,321 753,646 779,412 798,736 824,502 (1,500,000) (1,600,000) (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 1,126,906 1,385,000 1,665,461 1,875,561 2,110,330 2,270,967 2,462,187 33,807 41,550 49,964 56,267 63,310 68,129 73,866 1,160,714 1,426,550 1,715,425 1,931,828 2,173,640 2,339,096 2,536,053 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 83,738 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 $96,621.57 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 $96,621.57 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 96,621 $103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063.00 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504.44 109,504 109,504 $109,504.44 109,504 $115,945.88 2005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023Project Cost (Street Only) 1,700,000 1,695,000 1,400,000 2,255,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Assessments 40%(680,000) (678,000) (560,000) (902,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) City Share1,020,000 1,017,000 840,000 1,353,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 Other project Costs(200,000) (75,000) Tsfs in2,000,000 - Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2012**** 1,133,539 385,450 1,399,230 1,150,684 232,370 (20,859) (42,319) (31,916) (52,824) (52,829) (74,041) 366,371 Levy437,842 130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 1,114,690 1,111,790 Repayment627,842 737,346 823,528 879,726 815,680 809,235 847,040 821,253 840,556 827,652 815,052 821,472 Project Costs(1,825,000) (1,695,000) (1,475,000) (2,255,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) Investable Balance374,223 1,358,476 1,117,169 225,602 (20,252) (41,087) (30,987) (51,286) (51,291) (71,885) 355,700 799,633 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest11,227 40,754 33,515 6,768 (608) (1,233) (930) (1,539) (1,539) (2,157) 10,671 23,989 Fund Bal - EOY385,450 1,399,230 1,150,684 232,370 (20,859) (42,319) (31,916) (52,824) (52,829) (74,041) 366,371 823,622 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 $77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012$109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013$109,182 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$145,254 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 2022$96,62220232024202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,500,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (600,000) (640,000) (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 900,000 960,000 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 823,622 1,242,626 1,570,480 1,909,963 2,165,244 2,433,854 2,620,298 1,109,990 1,109,290 1,104,590 1,106,490 1,099,090 1,098,590 1,098,590 772,822 772,822 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,500,000) (1,600,000) (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 1,206,433 1,524,738 1,854,333 2,102,179 2,362,965 2,543,978 2,749,768 36,193 45,742 55,630 63,065 70,889 76,319 82,493 1,242,626 1,570,480 1,909,963 2,165,244 2,433,854 2,620,298 2,832,261 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Project Cost (Street Only) 1,410,000 1,400,000 2,255,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 Assessments 40% (564,000) (560,000) (902,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (640,000) City Share 846,000 840,000 1,353,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 960,000 Other project Costs (200,000) (75,000) Tsfs in- Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2013**** 2,600,000 1,913,767 1,507,247 445,131 43,784 (130,236) (276,971) (459,731) (626,443) (819,363) (555,811) (280,725) (49,351) Levy130,680 294,410 300,192 281,698 520,538 514,293 509,378 510,978 503,293 964,690 961,790 959,990 959,290 Repayment 737,346 805,170 879,726 815,680 809,235 847,040 821,253 840,556 827,652 815,052 821,472 772,822 772,822 Project Costs (1,410,000) (1,475,000) (2,255,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,600,000) Investable Balance 1,858,026 1,463,347 432,166 42,509 (126,443) (268,904) (446,340) (608,197) (795,498) (539,622) (272,549) (47,914) 82,760 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest55,741 43,900 12,965 1,275 (3,793) (8,067) (13,390) (18,246) (23,865) (16,189) (8,176) (1,437) 2,483 Fund Bal - EOY 1,913,767 1,507,247 445,131 43,784 (130,236) (276,971) (459,731) (626,443) (819,363) (555,811) (280,725) (49,351) 85,243 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 $109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $90,824 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$145,254 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 145,250 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2022$96,622 96,600 96,600 2023$96,622 96,600 2024$96,622202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 85,243 225,669 275,922 333,351 302,280 954,590 956,490 949,090 948,590 948,590 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 219,096 267,885 323,642 293,476 281,750 6,573 8,037 9,709 8,804 8,452 225,669 275,922 333,351 302,280 290,202 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025Project Cost (Street Only) 1,410,000 1,400,000 1,850,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,600,000 Assessments 40% (564,000) (560,000) (740,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (600,000) (640,000) City Share 846,000 840,000 1,110,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 960,000 Other project Costs (200,000) (175,000) Tsfs in467,919 Tenn Courts &61 studyFund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2013**** 2,600,000 2,395,723 2,055,163 1,581,133 1,341,497 1,334,042 1,358,870 1,352,820 1,368,119 1,362,670 1,339,856 1,319,984 1,274,418 Levy130,680 444,410 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 Repayment 737,346 805,170 879,726 789,593 783,152 820,957 795,170 814,473 801,569 788,969 795,389 772,822 772,822 Project Costs (1,410,000) (1,475,000) (1,850,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,500,000) (1,600,000) Investable Balance 2,325,945 1,995,304 1,535,081 1,302,424 1,295,186 1,319,291 1,313,418 1,328,271 1,322,980 1,300,831 1,281,538 1,237,299 1,091,032 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest69,778 59,859 46,052 39,073 38,856 39,579 39,403 39,848 39,689 39,025 38,446 37,119 32,731 Fund Bal - EOY 2,395,723 2,055,163 1,581,133 1,341,497 1,334,042 1,358,870 1,352,820 1,368,119 1,362,670 1,339,856 1,319,984 1,274,418 1,123,763 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 6%Project Year 2005 23,000 2006 34,000 34,000 2007 209,300 209,300 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 $109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $90,824 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 109,200 2014$90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 90,180 2015$119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 119,167 2016$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2017$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2018$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2019$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2020$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 2021$96,622 96,600 96,600 96,600 2022$96,622 96,600 96,600 2023$96,622 96,600 2024$96,622202520262027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2026 2027 2028 2029 20301,600,000 1,700,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 (640,000) (680,000) (680,000) (720,000) (720,000) 960,000 1,020,000 1,020,000 1,080,000 1,080,000 1,123,763 970,383 718,015 463,745 111,624 639,093 640,993 633,593 633,093 633,093 779,263 785,726 798,630 811,534 830,880 (1,600,000) (1,700,000) (1,700,000) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 942,119 697,102 450,238 108,373 (224,403) 28,264 20,913 13,507 3,251 (6,732) 970,383 718,015 463,745 111,624 (231,135) 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 96,600 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $103,063 103,063 103,063 103,063 $109,504 109,504 109,504 $109,504 109,504 $115,946 2005 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Project Cost (Street Only) 1,850,000 1,560,000 1,622,400 1,687,296 1,754,788 1,824,979 1,897,979 1,973,898 2,052,854 2,134,968 2,220,366 2,309,181 2,401,548 Assessments 40% (740,000) (624,000) (648,960) (674,918) (701,915) (729,992) (759,191) (789,559) (821,141) (853,987) (888,147) (923,672) (960,619) City Share 1,110,000 936,000 973,440 1,012,378 1,052,873 1,094,988 1,138,787 1,184,339 1,231,712 1,280,981 1,332,220 1,385,509 1,440,929 Other project CostsTenn Courts &(150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2014**** 2,148,552 1,636,854 1,494,985 1,524,599 1,525,724 1,282,774 952,408 537,815 64,427 (465,327) (1,078,333) (1,754,757) (2,501,964) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 856,015 762,369 756,830 799,461 782,556 814,961 819,547 850,053 885,931 898,612 934,557 971,939 1,010,817 Project Costs (1,850,000) (1,560,000) (1,622,400) (1,687,296) (1,754,788) (1,824,979) (1,897,979) (1,973,898) (2,052,854) (2,134,968) (2,220,366) (2,309,181) (2,401,548) Investable Balance 1,604,759 1,465,672 1,494,705 1,495,808 1,257,621 933,733 527,270 63,163 (456,203) (1,057,190) (1,720,350) (2,452,906) (3,251,703) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest32,095 29,313 29,894 29,916 25,152 18,675 10,545 1,263 (9,124) (21,144) (34,407) (49,058) (65,034) Fund Bal - EOY 1,636,854 1,494,985 1,524,599 1,525,724 1,282,774 952,408 537,815 64,427 (465,327) (1,078,333) (1,754,757) (2,501,964) (3,316,737) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016$97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,524 $97,5242017$101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,425 $101,4252018$105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,482 $105,4822019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,090 $114,0902021$118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,653 $118,6532022$123,400 $123,400 $123,400 $123,400 $123,4002023$128,336 $128,336 $128,336 $128,3362024$133,469 $133,469 $133,4692025$138,808 $138,8082026$144,3602027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2028 2029 20302,497,610 2,597,515 2,701,415 (999,044) (1,039,006) (1,080,566) 1,498,566 1,558,509 1,620,849 (3,316,737) (4,212,095) (5,184,882) 633,593 633,093 633,093 1,051,249 1,093,299 1,137,031 (2,497,610) (2,597,515) (2,701,415) (4,129,505) (5,083,217) (6,116,173) (82,590) (101,664) (122,323) (4,212,095) (5,184,882) (6,238,496) $114,090$118,653 $118,653$123,400 $123,400 $123,400$128,336 $128,336 $128,336$133,469 $133,469 $133,469$138,808 $138,808 $138,808$144,360 $144,360 $144,360$150,134 $150,134 $150,134$156,140 $156,140$162,385 2005 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027Project Cost (Street Only) 1,850,000 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (740,000) (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 1,110,000 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & (340,000) (150,000) Tsfs in125,000 194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2015**** 1,825,583 1,088,126 221,282 984,058 974,368 720,387 (309,747) (708,601) (1,165,889) (1,679,173) (2,275,329) (2,979,150) (3,709,611) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 450,192 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 856,015 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 Project Costs (1,850,000) (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 1,066,790 216,944 964,763 955,263 706,262 (303,673) (694,707) (1,143,029) (1,646,248) (2,230,715) (2,920,735) (3,636,874) (4,418,870) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest21,336 4,339 19,295 19,105 14,125 (6,073) (13,894) (22,861) (32,925) (44,614) (58,415) (72,737) (88,377) Fund Bal - EOY 1,088,126 221,282 984,058 974,368 720,387 (309,747) (708,601) (1,165,889) (1,679,173) (2,275,329) (2,979,150) (3,709,611) (4,507,247) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007 209,300 2008 103,063 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016$141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,9562026$144,5142027202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2028 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 2,704,292 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,500,162 1,560,169 1,622,575 (4,507,247) (5,385,067) (6,382,948) 633,593 633,093 633,093 1,094,447 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (5,279,478) (6,257,792) (7,315,905) (105,590) (125,156) (146,318) (5,385,067) (6,382,948) (7,462,223) $156,289$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 Assessments 40% (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) City Share 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 1,215,007 1,997,657 2,008,239 1,774,935 765,892 388,551 (46,794) (537,696) (1,111,023) (1,791,557) (2,498,267) (3,271,676) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 670,538 664,293 659,378 660,978 653,293 649,193 646,293 644,493 643,793 639,093 640,993 633,593 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 1,094,447 Project Costs (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) Investable Balance 1,191,183 1,958,487 1,968,862 1,740,133 750,875 380,932 (45,877) (527,153) (1,089,238) (1,756,429) (2,449,281) (3,207,525) (4,043,907) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest23,824 39,170 39,377 34,803 15,017 7,619 (918) (10,543) (21,785) (35,129) (48,986) (64,151) (80,878) Fund Bal - EOY 1,215,007 1,997,657 2,008,239 1,774,935 765,892 388,551 (46,794) (537,696) (1,111,023) (1,791,557) (2,498,267) (3,271,676) (4,124,785) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,956 $138,9562026$144,514 $144,5142027$150,294202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,600,281 2,704,292 (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,560,169 1,622,575 (4,124,785) (5,097,459) 633,093 633,093 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (4,997,509) (6,030,416) (99,950) (120,608) (5,097,459) (6,151,025) $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 2,260,000 922,400 1,687,300 1,754,792 2,500,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 Assessments 40% (904,000) (368,960) (674,920) (701,917) (1,000,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) City Share 1,356,000 553,440 1,012,380 1,052,875 1,500,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 1,215,007 1,752,143 1,512,301 1,023,564 (246,020) (889,114) (1,595,526) (2,362,917) (3,218,262) (4,186,455) (5,186,577) (6,259,266) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 429,838 423,593 418,678 420,278 412,593 408,493 405,593 403,793 403,093 398,393 400,293 392,893 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 800,591 799,461 782,557 814,962 861,747 892,379 928,388 941,207 933,532 1,014,823 1,053,855 1,094,447 Project Costs (2,260,000) (922,400) (1,687,300) (1,754,792) (2,500,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) Investable Balance 1,191,183 1,717,787 1,482,648 1,003,494 (241,196) (871,680) (1,564,242) (2,316,585) (3,155,159) (4,104,368) (5,084,879) (6,136,535) (7,272,197) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest23,824 34,356 29,653 20,070 (4,824) (17,434) (31,285) (46,332) (63,103) (82,087) (101,698) (122,731) (145,444) Fund Bal - EOY 1,215,007 1,752,143 1,512,301 1,023,564 (246,020) (889,114) (1,595,526) (2,362,917) (3,218,262) (4,186,455) (5,186,577) (6,259,266) (7,417,640) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,285 $141,2852017$57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,664 $57,6642018$105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,483 $105,4832019$109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,702 $109,7022020$156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,289 $156,2892021$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802022$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312023$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722024$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112025$138,956 $138,956 $138,9562026$144,514 $144,5142027$150,294202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,600,281 2,704,292 (1,040,112) (1,081,717) 1,560,169 1,622,575 (7,417,640) (8,701,686) 392,393 392,393 1,094,464 1,138,242 (2,600,281) (2,704,292) (8,531,065) (9,875,343) (170,621) (197,507) (8,701,686) (10,072,850) $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 $156,306$162,558 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 978,293 1,625,775 1,850,383 (217,231) 8,698 (125,994) (311,975) (576,098) (837,281) (1,268,231) (1,756,841) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 434,338 428,093 423,178 424,778 417,093 878,493 875,593 873,793 873,093 868,393 870,293 862,893 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 959,111 1,593,897 1,814,101 (212,972) 8,527 (123,524) (305,858) (564,802) (820,864) (1,243,364) (1,722,393) (2,235,122) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 19,182 31,878 36,282 (4,259) 171 (2,470) (6,117) (11,296) (16,417) (24,867) (34,448) (44,702) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 978,293 1,625,775 1,850,383 (217,231) 8,698 (125,994) (311,975) (576,098) (837,281) (1,268,231) (1,756,841) (2,279,824) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,279,824) (2,968,992) 862,393 862,393 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (2,910,776) (3,612,416) (58,216) (72,248) (2,968,992) (3,684,665) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 943,613 1,562,091 1,758,441 (342,381) (149,918) (318,747) (534,958) (831,446) (1,126,865) (1,589,574) (2,114,046) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 400,338 400,338 396,723 394,023 386,738 848,135 849,735 846,435 844,535 842,935 841,435 834,935 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 925,111 1,531,462 1,723,962 (335,668) (146,978) (312,497) (524,469) (815,143) (1,104,770) (1,558,406) (2,072,594) (2,620,285) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 18,502 30,629 34,479 (6,713) (2,940) (6,250) (10,489) (16,303) (22,095) (31,168) (41,452) (52,406) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 943,613 1,562,091 1,758,441 (342,381) (149,918) (318,747) (534,958) (831,446) (1,126,865) (1,589,574) (2,114,046) (2,672,690) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,672,690) (3,398,743) 833,935 833,935 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (3,332,101) (4,070,625) (66,642) (81,413) (3,398,743) (4,152,038) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028Project Cost (Street Only) 600,000 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 Assessments 40% (240,000) (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) City Share 360,000 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 382,365 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in194,751 194,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,680,000 2,908,207 927,803 1,530,155 1,710,056 (407,544) (232,194) (418,479) (652,494) (967,143) (1,281,086) (1,762,689) (2,306,433) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 431,698 384,838 384,838 381,223 378,523 371,238 832,635 834,235 830,935 829,035 827,435 825,935 819,435 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 762,369 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 Project Costs (600,000) (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) Investable Balance 2,851,183 909,611 1,500,152 1,676,526 (399,553) (227,641) (410,273) (639,700) (948,179) (1,255,966) (1,728,127) (2,261,209) (2,828,172) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest57,024 18,192 30,003 33,531 (7,991) (4,553) (8,205) (12,794) (18,964) (25,119) (34,563) (45,224) (56,563) Fund Bal - EOY 2,908,207 927,803 1,530,155 1,710,056 (407,544) (232,194) (418,479) (652,494) (967,143) (1,281,086) (1,762,689) (2,306,433) (2,884,735) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 2005200620072008 103,063 2009 58,795 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017$204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,9562027$144,514202820292030Revolving Assessment Fund 2029 20302,500,270 2,600,281 (1,000,108) (1,040,112) 1,500,162 1,560,169 (2,884,735) (3,630,839) 818,435 818,435 1,006,925 1,094,464 (2,500,270) (2,600,281) (3,559,646) (4,318,221) (71,193) (86,364) (3,630,839) (4,404,586) $68,767$118,780 $118,780$123,531 $123,531$128,472 $128,472$133,611 $133,611$138,956 $138,956$144,514 $144,514$150,294 $150,294$156,306 2005 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Project Cost (Street Only) 3,275,000 1,600,000 1,100,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 1,900,000 1,976,000 2,055,040 2,137,242 2,222,731 2,311,641 2,404,106 2,500,270 2,600,281 Assessments 40% (1,310,000) (640,000) (440,000) (1,320,000) (440,000) (760,000) (790,400) (822,016) (854,897) (889,093) (924,656) (961,642) (1,000,108) (1,040,112) City Share 1,965,000 960,000 660,000 1,980,000 660,000 1,140,000 1,185,600 1,233,024 1,282,345 1,333,639 1,386,984 1,442,464 1,500,162 1,560,169 Other project CostsTenn Courts & 750,000 (150,000) Tsfs in 474,751 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 2,689,263 990,081 1,593,678 1,774,850 (341,455) (164,782) (349,719) (582,360) (895,606) (1,208,118) (1,688,262) (2,230,517) (2,807,301) (3,551,856) Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 384,838 381,223 378,523 371,238 832,635 834,235 830,935 829,035 827,435 825,935 819,435 818,435 818,435 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 696,815 842,759 820,397 811,868 908,665 889,285 920,543 928,420 1,019,383 948,255 987,186 1,062,932 1,006,925 1,094,464 Project Costs (3,275,000) (1,600,000) (1,100,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (1,900,000) (1,976,000) (2,055,040) (2,137,242) (2,222,731) (2,311,641) (2,404,106) (2,500,270) (2,600,281) Investable Balance 970,667 1,562,429 1,740,049 (334,760) (161,551) (342,862) (570,941) (878,045) (1,184,429) (1,655,159) (2,186,782) (2,752,256) (3,482,212) (4,239,238) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest19,413 31,249 34,801 (6,695) (3,231) (6,857) (11,419) (17,561) (23,689) (33,103) (43,736) (55,045) (69,644) (84,785) Fund Bal - EOY 990,081 1,593,678 1,774,850 (341,455) (164,782) (349,719) (582,360) (895,606) (1,208,118) (1,688,262) (2,230,517) (2,807,301) (3,551,856) (4,324,023) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 20052006200720082009 58,795 2010 122,387 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,025 $100,0252019$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672020$206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,302 $206,3022021$68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,767 $68,7672022$118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,780 $118,7802023$123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,531 $123,5312024$128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,472 $128,4722025$133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,611 $133,6112026$138,956 $138,956 $138,956 $138,9562027$144,514 $144,514 $144,5142028$150,294 $150,2942029$156,3062030Revolving Assessment Fund Revolving Assessment Fund - Option #2A (suggested new franchise fee)2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 Assessments 40%City Share- 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,100,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsfs in Market Blvd 194,751 194,751 (600,000) Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 3,316,243 3,426,504 4,982,777 6,046,765 5,920,761 5,573,289 5,076,599 4,254,012 3,304,630 2,222,606 1,001,878 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 2,700,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 842,759 720,372 643,075 533,571 445,424 357,902 242,248 204,739 - - - - - Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,100,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) Investable Balance 2,437,348 3,251,218 3,359,318 4,885,076 5,928,201 5,804,668 5,464,009 4,977,058 4,170,600 3,239,833 2,179,025 982,233 (356,706) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 65,024 67,186 97,702 118,564 116,093 109,280 99,541 83,412 64,797 43,581 19,645 (7,134) Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 3,316,243 3,426,504 4,982,777 6,046,765 5,920,761 5,573,289 5,076,599 4,254,012 3,304,630 2,222,606 1,001,878 (363,840) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.25%Project Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,73920182019202020211 Revolving Assessment Fund - Option Levy or FF & Assess2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Assessments 40%City Share- 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsfs in Market Blvd 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 2,296,243 3,304,104 5,877,929 7,877,820 8,706,437 9,332,679 9,829,177 10,019,641 10,103,571 10,075,526 9,929,857 9,660,699 9,261,964 8,727,337 8,050,261 7,223,935 6,241,303 5,095,045 3,777,568 2,281,001 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 1,700,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 3,600,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 842,759 720,372 643,075 533,571 445,424 357,902 242,248 204,739 - - - - - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,600,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) (4,180,341) (4,305,752) (4,434,924) (4,567,972) (4,705,011) (4,846,161) (4,991,546) (5,141,292) (5,295,531) Investable Balance 2,437,348 2,251,218 3,239,318 5,762,676 7,723,353 8,535,723 9,149,685 9,636,448 9,823,178 9,905,462 9,877,967 9,735,154 9,471,273 9,080,357 8,556,213 7,892,413 7,082,290 6,118,924 4,995,142 3,703,498 2,236,276 585,470 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 45,024 64,786 115,254 154,467 170,714 182,994 192,729 196,464 198,109 197,559 194,703 189,425 181,607 171,124 157,848 141,646 122,378 99,903 74,070 44,726 11,709 Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 2,296,243 3,304,104 5,877,929 7,877,820 8,706,437 9,332,679 9,829,177 10,019,641 10,103,571 10,075,526 9,929,857 9,660,699 9,261,964 8,727,337 8,050,261 7,223,935 6,241,303 5,095,045 3,777,568 2,281,001 597,180 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.75%Project Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02019$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02020$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02021$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02022$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02023$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02024$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02026$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02027$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02028$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02029$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02030$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02031$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02032$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02033$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02034$0 $0 $0 $0 $02035$0 $0 $0 $02036$0 $0 $02037$0 $02038$02039 Revolving Assessment Fund - Option FF, Assess & Bond Lyman & Galpin2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Assessments 40%(1,080,000) (1,320,000) (1,140,000) (880,000) (1,320,000) (1,359,600) (1,400,388) (1,442,400) (1,485,672) (1,530,242) (1,576,149) (1,623,434) (1,672,137) (1,722,301) (1,773,970) (1,827,189) (1,882,004) (1,938,465) (1,996,618) (2,056,517) (2,118,212) City Share- 1,620,000 1,980,000 460,000 1,320,000 1,980,000 2,039,400 2,100,582 2,163,599 2,228,507 2,295,363 2,364,224 2,435,150 2,508,205 2,583,451 2,660,954 2,740,783 2,823,007 2,907,697 2,994,928 3,084,775 3,177,319 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsf's Bond Lyman&Gal 194,751 194,751 (550,000) (550,000) (550,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (380,000) (380,000) (380,000) Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 2,296,243 1,796,750 3,047,753 3,883,769 3,280,752 2,661,407 2,108,524 1,456,372 915,419 876,970 754,881 580,708 787,367 927,511 997,689 994,320 913,684 751,919 505,018 168,821 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 1,700,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment842,759 720,372 815,277 916,242 1,009,864 1,062,655 1,157,470 1,336,744 1,355,291 1,585,277 1,649,960 1,683,482 1,753,024 1,871,562$ 1,927,709$ 1,985,540$ 2,045,106$ 2,106,459$ 2,169,653$ 2,234,743$ 2,301,785$ 2,370,839$ Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,600,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) (4,180,341) (4,305,752) (4,434,924) (4,567,972) (4,705,011) (4,846,161) (4,991,546) (5,141,292) (5,295,531) Investable Balance 2,437,348 2,251,218 1,761,520 2,987,993 3,807,617 3,216,424 2,609,222 2,067,180 1,427,816 897,470 859,775 740,079 569,321 771,928 909,324 978,127 974,824 895,768 737,176 495,116 165,511 (255,872) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 45,024 35,230 59,760 76,152 64,328 52,184 41,344 28,556 17,949 17,195 14,802 11,386 15,439 18,186 19,563 19,496 17,915 14,744 9,902 3,310 (5,117) Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 2,296,243 1,796,750 3,047,753 3,883,769 3,280,752 2,661,407 2,108,524 1,456,372 915,419 876,970 754,881 580,708 787,367 927,511 997,689 994,320 913,684 751,919 505,018 168,821 (260,989) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.75%Assess $500k Market BlvdProject Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02019$172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,2022020$210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,4692021$181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,769 $181,7692022$140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,313 $140,3132023$210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,4692024$216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,7832025$223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,2872026$229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,9852027$236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,8852028$243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,9912029$251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,3112030$258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,8502031$266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,6162032$274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,6142033$282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,8532034$291,338 $291,338 $291,338 $291,338 $291,3382035$300,079 $300,079 $300,079 $300,0792036$309,081 $309,081 $309,0812037$318,353 $318,3532038$327,9042039 Revolving Assessment Fund - Option FF, Assess & Bond Lyman & Galpin2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039Project Cost (Street Only) - 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Assessments 40%City Share- 2,700,000 3,300,000 1,600,000 2,200,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 4,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 Other project CostsTenn Courts (185,000) (150,000) (75,000) Tsf's Bond Lyman&Gal 194,751 194,751 (550,000) (550,000) (550,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (930,000) (380,000) (380,000) (380,000) Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2016**** 1,200,000 2,486,095 2,296,243 3,151,104 5,568,869 7,409,579 7,688,231 7,753,509 7,677,823 7,284,661 6,773,291 6,699,040 6,506,241 6,189,011 6,128,843 5,939,553 5,614,722 5,147,685 4,531,527 3,759,073 2,822,878 1,715,217 Levy - From Debt Levy Schedule 384,838 1,700,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment842,759 720,372 643,075 533,571 445,424 357,902 242,248 204,739 - - - - - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Costs- (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (1,600,000) (2,200,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) (4,180,341) (4,305,752) (4,434,924) (4,567,972) (4,705,011) (4,846,161) (4,991,546) (5,141,292) (5,295,531) Investable Balance 2,437,348 2,251,218 3,089,318 5,459,676 7,264,293 7,537,481 7,601,479 7,527,278 7,141,824 6,640,482 6,567,687 6,378,668 6,067,658 6,008,669 5,823,091 5,504,629 5,046,750 4,442,674 3,685,366 2,767,527 1,681,585 419,686 MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,747 45,024 61,786 109,194 145,286 150,750 152,030 150,546 142,836 132,810 131,354 127,573 121,353 120,173 116,462 110,093 100,935 88,853 73,707 55,351 33,632 8,394 Fund Bal - EOY 2,486,095 2,296,243 3,151,104 5,568,869 7,409,579 7,688,231 7,753,509 7,677,823 7,284,661 6,773,291 6,699,040 6,506,241 6,189,011 6,128,843 5,939,553 5,614,722 5,147,685 4,531,527 3,759,073 2,822,878 1,715,217 428,080 Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.75%Assess $500k Market BlvdProject Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02019$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02020$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02021$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02022$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02023$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02024$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02026$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02027$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02028$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02029$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02030$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02031$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02032$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02033$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02034$0 $0 $0 $0 $02035$0 $0 $0 $02036$0 $0 $02037$0 $02038$02039 Revolving Assessment Fund - Levy or FF & Assess2005 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034Project Cost (Street Only) - 1,900,000 2,700,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 3,399,000 3,500,970 3,605,999 3,714,179 3,825,604 3,940,373 4,058,584 4,180,341 4,305,752 4,434,924 4,567,972 4,705,011 Assessments 40%(760,000) (1,080,000) (1,320,000) (1,320,000) (1,359,600) (1,400,388) (1,442,400) (1,485,672) (1,530,242) (1,576,149) (1,623,434) (1,672,137) (1,722,301) (1,773,970) (1,827,189) (1,882,004) City Share- 1,140,000 1,620,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 2,039,400 2,100,582 2,163,599 2,228,507 2,295,363 2,364,224 2,435,150 2,508,205 2,583,451 2,660,954 2,740,783 2,823,007 Other project CostsTenn Courts & (400,000) (75,000) Tsfs in Trail 194,751 194,751 Fund Bal - BOY Estimate for 2018**** 1,485,000 2,473,081 1,889,723 1,962,198 1,449,622 1,054,294 703,080 495,832 543,620 507,772 599,175 700,611 764,192 754,201 673,362 518,137 284,857 Levy And/Or Franchise Fee 384,838 1,084,838 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 Reduction for Other purposesRepayment 360,000 400,000 450,000 550,000 600,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,359,128 1,384,374 1,621,259 1,744,071 1,823,181 1,871,562 1,927,709$ 1,985,540$ 2,045,106$ 2,106,459$ Project Costs- (1,900,000) (2,700,000) (3,300,000) (3,300,000) (3,399,000) (3,500,970) (3,605,999) (3,714,179) (3,825,604) (3,940,373) (4,058,584) (4,180,341) (4,305,752) (4,434,924) (4,567,972) (4,705,011) Investable Balance 2,424,589 1,852,670 1,923,723 1,421,198 1,033,622 689,294 486,110 532,961 497,816 587,427 686,874 749,208 739,413 660,158 507,978 279,272 (29,695) MVHC Street Levy & TsfInterest48,492 37,053 38,474 28,424 20,672 13,786 9,722 10,659 9,956 11,749 13,737 14,984 14,788 13,203 10,160 5,585 (594) Fund Bal - EOY 2,473,081 1,889,723 1,962,198 1,449,622 1,054,294 703,080 495,832 543,620 507,772 599,175 700,611 764,192 754,201 673,362 518,137 284,857 (30,288) Repayment Schedule8 yr assmt @ 5.75%Project Year 200520062007200820092010 122,387 2011 77,297 77,297 2012 109,504 109,504 109,504 2013 $88,147 $88,147 $88,147 $88,1472014 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,522 $87,5222015 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,654 $115,6542016 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,509 $37,5092017 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,739 $204,7392018$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02019$121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,179 $121,1792020$172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,202 $172,2022021$210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,4692022$210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,469 $210,4692023$216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,783 $216,7832024$223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,287 $223,2872025$229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,985 $229,9852026$236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,885 $236,8852027$243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,991 $243,9912028$251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,311 $251,3112029$258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,850 $258,8502030$266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,6162031$274,614 $274,614 $274,6142032$282,853 $282,8532033$291,338203420352036203720382039 2035 2036 2037 2038 20394,846,161 4,991,546 5,141,292 5,295,531 5,454,397 (1,938,465) (1,996,618) (2,056,517) (2,118,212) (2,181,759) 2,907,697 2,994,928 3,084,775 3,177,319 3,272,638 (30,288) (431,252) (922,137) (1,507,197) (2,190,848) 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,284,000 2,169,653$ 2,234,743$ 2,301,785$ 2,370,839$ 2,441,964$ (4,846,161) (4,991,546) (5,141,292) (5,295,531) (5,454,397) (422,797) (904,056) (1,477,644) (2,147,890) (2,919,281) (8,456) (18,081) (29,553) (42,958) (58,386) (431,252) (922,137) (1,507,197) (2,190,848) (2,977,667) $243,991$251,311 $251,311$258,850 $258,850 $258,850$266,616 $266,616 $266,616 $266,616$274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614 $274,614$282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,853 $282,853$291,338 $291,338 $291,338 $291,338 $291,338$300,079 $300,079 $300,079 $300,079 $300,079$309,081 $309,081 $309,081 $309,081$318,353 $318,353 $318,353$327,904 $327,904$337,741 City of Chanhassen, MinnesotaBond Tax Levies2006-20252005 C Ref1998A Park 2002A Subtotal of 2001C 2003A 2004A Subtotal of 1999 2001B ^^ Subtotal of 2000 Subtotal of Total Year of GO Park GO Library Market GO Equip GO Equip GO GO GO Impr GO Impr Spec Assmt GO Pub Other GeneralCollection Bonds Bonds Value Levies Certs Certs Bonds Levies Bonds Bonds Levies Proj Levies Bonded Debt2006 634,800 486,700 1,121,500 138,814 345,800 484,614 100,000 100,000 122,048 122,048 1,828,162 2007 696,500 489,100 1,185,600 141,380 346,900 488,280 100,000 100,000 122,548 122,548 1,896,428 2008 695,900 490,700 1,186,600 138,173 346,700 484,873 100,000 100,000 122,703 122,703 1,894,176 2009 972,700 491,300 1,464,000 297,900 297,900 - 122,603 122,603 1,884,503 2010 496,400 496,400 122,195 122,195 618,595 2011 495,400 495,400 126,420 126,420 621,820 2012 498,800 498,800 498,800 2013 501,200 501,200 501,200 2014 502,400 502,400 502,400 2015 502,500 502,500 502,500 2016 507,000 507,000 507,000 2017 505,100 505,100 505,100 2018 512,800 512,800 512,800 2019 513,900 513,900 513,900 2020 513,700 513,700 513,700 2021 517,500 517,500 517,500 Totals 2,999,900 8,024,500 11,024,400 - 418,367 1,337,300 1,755,667 300,000 - 300,000 738,515 738,515 13,818,582 2005 2006 2007 2008 2005 2008 2010 Total LevyExcess to ** Potential Actual Spec AssmtSpec AssmtSpec AssmtSpec Assmt 212 Bonds PW Facility Fire Station Year w/ CIP EstPay debt Excess Levy Levy200680,000 2006 1,908,162 285,000 - 1,938,790200780,000 2007 1,976,428 63,000 - 1,913,4282008285,000 2008 2,179,176 269,986 - 1,909,1902009285,000 250,000 2009 2,419,503 510,313 - 1,909,1902010285,000 250,000 2010 1,153,595 1,128,299 785,195 1,938,7902011285,000 250,000 370,000 2011 1,526,820 411,970 1,938,7902012285,000 250,000 370,000 2012 1,403,800 534,990 1,938,7902013285,000 250,000 370,000 2013 1,406,200 532,590 1,938,7902014285,000 250,000 370,000 2014 1,407,400 531,390 1,938,7902015285,000 250,000 370,000 2015 1,407,500 531,290 1,938,7902016285,000 250,000 370,000 2016 1,412,000 526,790 1,938,7902017250,000 370,000 2017 1,125,100 813,690 1,938,7902018250,000 370,000 2018 1,132,800 805,990 1,938,7902019250,000 370,000 2019 1,133,900 804,890 1,938,7902020250,000 370,000 2020 1,133,700 805,090 1,938,7902021250,000 370,000 2021 1,137,500 801,290 1,938,7902022250,000 370,000 2022 620,000 1,318,790 1,938,7902023250,000 370,000 2023 620,000 1,318,790 1,938,7902024250,000 370,000 2024 620,000 1,318,790 1,938,7902025250,000 370,000 2025 620,000 1,318,790 1,938,790Totals - - - - - - - 2,725,000 4,250,000 5,550,000 - 40,310 26,343,582 ** - These funds to be used to pay down the debt levy each of the next four years.The PW facility is for $3.9 million of which $3.0 will be bonded for and the Fire Station and Equipment is for $4.5 million in principal.^^ - The 2001B debt service fund has sufficient fund balance due to prepaid specials, we are able to cancel the levy needed to pay the debt in 2008 & 2009. It is our plan to use that excess levy for General Fund Operations rather than lower the use of Cash Reserves to keep the debt levy flat from the previous year. City of Chanhassen, MinnesotaBond Tax Levies2006-20292005 C Ref1998A Park2002A2010ASubtotal of2001C2003A2004ASubtotal of19992001B ^^Subtotal of2000Subtotal ofTotal Year of GO ParkGO LibraryGO RefundMarket GO EquipGO EquipGOGOGO ImprGO ImprSpec AssmtGO PubOtherGeneralCollectionBondsBonds2002A LibValue LeviesCertsCertsBondsLeviesBondsBondsLeviesProjLeviesBonded Debt2006634,800 486,700 1,121,500 138,814 345,800 484,614 100,000 100,000 122,048 122,048 1,828,162 2007696,500 489,100 1,185,600 141,380 346,900 488,280 100,000 100,000 122,548 122,548 1,896,428 2008695,900 490,700 1,186,600 138,173 346,700 484,873 100,000 100,000 122,703 122,703 1,894,176 2009972,700 491,300 1,464,000 297,900 297,900 - 122,603 122,603 1,884,503 2010496,400 496,400 122,195 122,195 618,595 2011495,400 495,400 126,420 126,420 621,820 2012351,648 351,648 351,648 2013445,310 445,310 445,310 2014448,880 448,880 448,880 2015446,098 446,098 446,098 2016452,792 452,792 452,792 2017451,952 451,952 451,952 2018461,297 461,297 461,297 2019459,512 459,512 459,512 2020457,412 457,412 457,412 2021465,497 465,497 465,497 Totals2,999,900 2,949,600 4,440,398 10,389,898 - 418,367 1,337,300 1,755,667 300,000 - 300,000 738,515 738,515 13,184,080 2009A@@20052016 A2008 ##2010 2010Total LevyExcess to ** Potential Actual Excess Lib212 BondsPW RefundPW FacilityFire StationAudubonYearw/ CIP EstPay debt Excess Levy Levy Levy200680,000 20061,908,162 285,000 - 1,938,790200780,000 20071,976,428 67,238 - 1,909,1902008285,000 20082,179,176 269,986 - 1,909,1902009285,000 20092,169,503 460,313 - 1,809,1902010337,500 599,300 253,795 20101,809,190 - - 1,809,1902011336,800 594,000 256,570 20111,809,190 - 1,809,1902012335,900 593,800 437,842 20121,719,190 - 1,719,1902013550,000 593,200 130,680 20131,719,190 - 1,719,1902014233,800 592,100 444,410 20141,719,190 - 1,719,1902015232,300 590,600 55,000 20151,323,998 395,192 1,719,1902016240,700 594,000 20161,287,492 431,698 1,719,1902017596,700 20171,048,652 384,838 1,433,4902018470,400 2018931,697 384,838 1,316,5352019475,800 2019935,312 381,223 1,316,5352020480,600 2020938,012 378,523 1,316,5352021479,800 2021945,297 371,238 1,316,5352022483,900 2022483,900 832,635 1,316,5352023482,300 2023482,300 834,235 1,316,5352024485,600 2024485,600 830,935 1,316,5352025487,500 2025487,500 829,035 1,316,5352026489,100 2026489,100 827,435 1,316,5352027490,600 2027490,600 825,935 1,316,5352028497,100 2028497,100 819,435 1,316,5352029498,100 2029498,100 818,435 1,316,535Totals- - - - - 2,267,000 730,000 5,820,800 4,753,700 - 1,578,297 48,420 28,333,877 1,082,536 ** - These funds to be used to pay down the debt levy each of the next four years.## - The PW facility is for 8 Million and bonding for $7 Million of the 8 Million.@@ - The 2009A Refunded the 2005A Mndot loand and 2006A MUSA area improvements.Debt Levies Excess Levy Available Excess Levy Available Original Bond Scenario New Facil Bond Scenario Difference 2010 785,195$ #REF! #REF! 2011 411,970 #REF! #REF! 2012 534,990 #REF! #REF! 2013 532,590 #REF! #REF! 2014 531,390 #REF! #REF! 2015 531,290 #REF! #REF! 2016 526,790 #REF! #REF! 2017 813,690 #REF! #REF! 2018 805,990 #REF! #REF! 2019 804,890 #REF! #REF! 2020 805,090 #REF! #REF! 2021 801,290 #REF! #REF! 2022 1,318,790 #REF! #REF! 2023 1,318,790 #REF! #REF! 2024 1,318,790 #REF! #REF! 2025 1,318,790 #REF! #REF! 13,160,325$ #REF! #REF! CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Ordinance 635: Amendment to Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to Allow Additional Signage for Target Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2. Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­15 PROPOSED MOTION If the City Council decides to approve the amendment: “The Chanhassen City Council approves the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." If the City Council decides to deny the amendment: “The Chanhassen City Council denies the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision." Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Target is requesting an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit signage along their building’s north façade at 851 West 78th Street. The PUD currently limits signage to two street frontages and the building has existing signage along its western and southern frontages. Target recently added a liquor section to the northwest corner of their store as part of extensive interior and exterior renovations and feels that signage along the West 78 th Street frontage is needed to provide visibility for the new liquor section. Other buildings within the PUD already have signage along three street frontages. In reviewing the requested PUD amendment, staff examined the general sign code that would govern the property in the absence of a PUD ordinance, other PUDs, and sign plans within the city, and the existing signage within the PUD. Staff believes that amending the PUD to allow signage along each street frontage would be in line with the city’s general sign code and the treatment of similar properties. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed PUD amendment. (A full breakdown and analysis of the requested amendment can be found in the attached staff report.) BACKGROUND CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectOrdinance 635: Amendment to Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to Allow Additional Signage forTargetSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­15PROPOSED MOTIONIf the City Council decides to approve the amendment:“The Chanhassen City Council approves the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned UnitDevelopment, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."If the City Council decides to deny the amendment:“The Chanhassen City Council denies the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned UnitDevelopment, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYTarget is requesting an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permitsignage along their building’s north façade at 851 West 78th Street. The PUD currently limits signage to two streetfrontages and the building has existing signage along its western and southern frontages. Target recently added a liquorsection to the northwest corner of their store as part of extensive interior and exterior renovations and feels thatsignage along the West 78 th Street frontage is needed to provide visibility for the new liquor section. Other buildingswithin the PUD already have signage along three street frontages.In reviewing the requested PUD amendment, staff examined the general sign code that would govern the property inthe absence of a PUD ordinance, other PUDs, and sign plans within the city, and the existing signage within the PUD.Staff believes that amending the PUD to allow signage along each street frontage would be in line with the city’sgeneral sign code and the treatment of similar properties.The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed PUD amendment.(A full breakdown and analysis of the requested amendment can be found in the attached staff report.) BACKGROUND Chanhassen Retail Center PUD: On October 26, 1992, the City Council gave final approval for the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD and Target project. The PUD stipulated that wall signage was limited to a maximum of two street frontages. On February 8, 2010, the City Council approved an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD that allowed for the use of LED lights and adopted the Central Business District standards for the PUD’s setbacks, height, landscape, lot cover, and other standards not stipulated by the PUD. On December 6, 2017, sign permits were issued for revised signage along Target's south and west elevations.  On December 28, 2017, a building permit was issued for an interior and exterior remodel of the Target store. On February 12, 2018, the City Council approved an off­sale intoxicating liquor license for Target.  On September 4, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed PUD amendment. On September 10, 2018, the City Council discussed signage and Planned Unit Developments during the work session. DISCUSSION During the Public Hearing, local business owner Michael Clausen expressed his opposition to the proposed amendment. He noted that when he opened his business five years ago, he had expressed interest in having signage along three sides of his building but had been told by city staff that it was only permitted along two sides. He expressed his understanding that City Code limits signage to two sides per building. He did not feel it was fair to change the rules for Target, and felt they should be held to the same standard as every other business. Commissioner Madsen asked staff if they could address his comments. Staff replied that the city’s base sign ordinance allows one sign per street frontage, but that different development’s PUDs and sign plans may restrict the number of street frontages. Staff noted that eleven of the PUDs and sign plans surveyed limited their business to two street frontages, and that if the speaker’s business was located in one of those, he would have been informed that he was only allowed signage on two elevations. Chairman Aller asked for clarification as to the potential impact of the proposed amendment. Staff clarified that it would allow all businesses within the PUD to one wall sign per street frontage, as provided for in the base sign code. Commissioner Madsen asked how many signs a business zoned Central Business District (CBD) is allowed if it is not in a PUD. Staff responded that they would be entitled to signage along each street frontage. The Commissioners expressed concern that businesses within the PUD and CBD all be treated fairly. They expressed interest in keeping the PUD internally consistent and making sure that all businesses within it were governed by the same provisions. Commissioner Madsen questioned the need for additional signage on Target. Chairman Aller expressed the opinion that the new liquor store was essentially a new service that may require additional advertising. Commissioner Tietz asked staff how this request related to the recently passed pick­ up/drive­up sign ordinance. Staff responded that the pick­up/drive­up signs change was citywide and fell under the category of directional signage. Commissioner Undestad stated that retail is changing and that signage needs are changing with it. He expressed support for changing it at the PUD level. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectOrdinance 635: Amendment to Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to Allow Additional Signage forTargetSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­15PROPOSED MOTIONIf the City Council decides to approve the amendment:“The Chanhassen City Council approves the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned UnitDevelopment, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."If the City Council decides to deny the amendment:“The Chanhassen City Council denies the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned UnitDevelopment, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision."Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYTarget is requesting an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permitsignage along their building’s north façade at 851 West 78th Street. The PUD currently limits signage to two streetfrontages and the building has existing signage along its western and southern frontages. Target recently added a liquorsection to the northwest corner of their store as part of extensive interior and exterior renovations and feels thatsignage along the West 78 th Street frontage is needed to provide visibility for the new liquor section. Other buildingswithin the PUD already have signage along three street frontages.In reviewing the requested PUD amendment, staff examined the general sign code that would govern the property inthe absence of a PUD ordinance, other PUDs, and sign plans within the city, and the existing signage within the PUD.Staff believes that amending the PUD to allow signage along each street frontage would be in line with the city’sgeneral sign code and the treatment of similar properties.The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the proposed PUD amendment.(A full breakdown and analysis of the requested amendment can be found in the attached staff report.)BACKGROUNDChanhassen Retail Center PUD:On October 26, 1992, the City Council gave final approval for the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD and Target project.The PUD stipulated that wall signage was limited to a maximum of two street frontages.On February 8, 2010, the City Council approved an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD that allowed forthe use of LED lights and adopted the Central Business District standards for the PUD’s setbacks, height, landscape, lotcover, and other standards not stipulated by the PUD.On December 6, 2017, sign permits were issued for revised signage along Target's south and west elevations. On December 28, 2017, a building permit was issued for an interior and exterior remodel of the Target store.On February 12, 2018, the City Council approved an off­sale intoxicating liquor license for Target. On September 4, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed PUD amendment.On September 10, 2018, the City Council discussed signage and Planned Unit Developments during the worksession.DISCUSSIONDuring the Public Hearing, local business owner Michael Clausen expressed his opposition to the proposedamendment. He noted that when he opened his business five years ago, he had expressed interest in having signagealong three sides of his building but had been told by city staff that it was only permitted along two sides. Heexpressed his understanding that City Code limits signage to two sides per building. He did not feel it was fair tochange the rules for Target, and felt they should be held to the same standard as every other business.Commissioner Madsen asked staff if they could address his comments. Staff replied that the city’s base sign ordinanceallows one sign per street frontage, but that different development’s PUDs and sign plans may restrict the number ofstreet frontages. Staff noted that eleven of the PUDs and sign plans surveyed limited their business to two streetfrontages, and that if the speaker’s business was located in one of those, he would have been informed that he wasonly allowed signage on two elevations.Chairman Aller asked for clarification as to the potential impact of the proposed amendment. Staff clarified that itwould allow all businesses within the PUD to one wall sign per street frontage, as provided for in the base sign code.Commissioner Madsen asked how many signs a business zoned Central Business District (CBD) is allowed if it is notin a PUD. Staff responded that they would be entitled to signage along each street frontage.The Commissioners expressed concern that businesses within the PUD and CBD all be treated fairly. They expressedinterest in keeping the PUD internally consistent and making sure that all businesses within it were governed by thesame provisions.Commissioner Madsen questioned the need for additional signage on Target.Chairman Aller expressed the opinion that the new liquor store was essentially a new service that may requireadditional advertising.Commissioner Tietz asked staff how this request related to the recently passed pick­ up/drive­up sign ordinance. Staffresponded that the pick­up/drive­up signs change was citywide and fell under the category of directional signage.Commissioner Undestad stated that retail is changing and that signage needs are changing with it. He expressed support for changing it at the PUD level. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the ordinance amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development. The recommended amendment would allow businesses in the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development to have signage along each street frontage by removing the clause limiting each business to two street frontages. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report_Target PUD Amendment Chanhassen Retail Center PUD Ord as of Feb 8, 2010 Chanhassen Retail Center PUD Ord Amendment 2018­15 Findings of Fact (Approval) Findings of Fact (Denial) Development Review Application Chanhassen PUD Amendment Cover Letter Elevations Public Hearing Notice Documents CITY OF CHANHASSEN PC DATE: September 4, 2018 CC DATE: September 24, 2018 REVIEW DEADLINE: 10/2/2018 CASE #:2018-15 Chanhassen Retail Center PUD Amendment BY: MacKenzie Walters SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting that the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development be amended to allow signage along three street frontages. LOCATION: 851 W. 78th Street APPLICANT: Leila Bunge (Kimley-Horn & Associates) 2550 University Ave. W. 238N St. Paul, MN 55113 OWNER: Target Corporation PO Box 9456 Minneapolis, MN 55440 PRESENT ZONING: PUD 2030 LAND USE PLAN: Commercial ACREAGE: 18.69 Acres DENSITY: N/A LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The city has a relatively high level of discretion in approving rezonings, PUDs and amendments to PUDs because the city is acting in its legislative or policy-making capacity. A rezoning or PUD, and amendment thereto, must be consistent with the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Notice of this public hearing has been mailed to all property owners within 500 feet. PROPOSED MOTION: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” (Note: a motion for denial and appropriate findings of fact are also included at the end of the report.) Planning Commission Chanhassen Retail Center (Target) – Planning Case 2018-15 September 4, 2018 Page 2 of 5 PROPOSAL/SUMMARY Target is requesting an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit signage along their building’s north façade at 851 W. 78th Street. The PUD currently limits signage to two street frontages and the building has existing signage along its western and southern frontages. Target recently added a liquor section to the northwest corner of their store as part of extensive interior and exterior renovations and feels that signage along the W. 78th Street frontage is need to provide visibility for the new liquor section. Other buildings within the PUD already have signage along three street frontages. In reviewing the requested PUD amendment, staff examined the general sign code that would govern the property in the absence of a PUD ordinance, other PUDs and sign plans within the city, and the existing signage within the PUD. Staff believes that the requested PUD amendment is in line with the city’s general sign code and the treatment of similar properties. Staff is recommending approval of the proposed PUD amendment. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance: Limits wall signs to two street frontages per business, and a maximum of 15 percent (15%) total wall area. Chapter 20, Article XXVI. – Signs: Limits wall signs in Central Business District (CBD) to one sign per street frontage per business, and provides a sliding scale for maximum display area. BACKGROUND Chanhassen Retail Center PUD: On October 26, 1992, the City Council gave final approval for the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD and Target Project. The PUD stipulated that wall signage was limited to a maximum of two street frontages. On February 8, 2010, the City Council approved an amendment to the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD that allowed for the use of LED lights and adopted the Central Business District standards for the PUD’s setbacks, height, landscape, lot cover, and other standards not stipulated by the PUD. Relevant Sign Variances: 2003-05: Allowed Giant Panda to place signs on three building elevations, sign plan limited Highway 5 Centre to two elevations. 2017-03: Allowed Dominos to place sign on eastern façade, sign plan limited Colonial Square to southern façade. Planning Commission Chanhassen Retail Center (Target) – Planning Case 2018-15 September 4, 2018 Page 3 of 5 ANALYSIS In regulating signage the city attempts to balance the advertising needs of businesses with the potential visual nuisance/negative aesthetics that can be created by unrestricted signage. One of the main ways that the city does this is by limiting which elevations can display wall signage. The city’s general sign code allows businesses to display signage along each street frontage and allows signage on the entrance façade in cases where the individual entrance does not front a public street. The city also uses sign plans to further regulate the signage of planned centers and multi-tenant buildings. These sign plans often designate the location of the building’s sign bands and can limit the number and height of elevations where signage is permitted. PUDs often also have unique sign criteria that can specify which elevations are allowed to display signage, and often establish design and style criteria for the development. Staff conducted a survey of 29 PUD ordinances and sign plans in order to determine what the general trend for provisions regulating the maximum number of elevations were for these developments. Almost half of these developments allow businesses to display signs on each street elevation, with the next most common limit being a maximum of two elevations. Staff also found two instances in which variances were granted to allow businesses to display signage along a façade prohibited by their sign plan or development’s PUD. The Chanhassen Retail Center PUD limits each building’s wall signage to a maximum of two street frontages, but does not specify which frontages are allowed signage. As shown by the table to the left, the various buildings have signage facing all four potential directions and two of the PUD’s five buildings already have signage along three street frontages. The building shared by Noodles and Jersey Mike’s has signage along three frontages because the interpretation was made that each business was entitled to signage along two elevations. Staff believes that Perkins was allowed signage along three elevations due to a permitting error. In many cases where buildings are limited to specific number of elevations, the elevations are specified (i.e. signage is only permitted on north and south elevations). These specific restrictions tend to reflect the architectural design of the building or the nature of adjacent land uses. The intent is typically to prevent unnecessary signage, signage that will detract from the aesthetics of the building, or signage that will be highly visible to a residential neighborhood. The Chanhassen Retail Center PUD is not located near any residential neighborhoods and is surrounded by commercial and industrial uses. In this situation, the primary intent of the restriction is to prevent superfluous Survey of Number of Permitted Sign Frontages Frontages allowed 1 2 3 1 per street frontage Total PUD 0 3 1 9 13 Sign Plans 1 8 1 6 16 Combined 1 11 2 15 29 Chanhassen Retail Center Signage Business Frontages Target South and West Noodles and Company* South and East Jersey Mike's Subs* North and East Taco Bell North and East Leeann Chin North and South Perkins North, East, and West *Noodles and Jersey Mike’s share a building so their building has signage on three frontages. Planning Commission Chanhassen Retail Center (Target) – Planning Case 2018-15 September 4, 2018 Page 4 of 5 signage as some of the buildings have street frontages where additional signage would not increase the business’s visibility or would be redundant due to the presence of monument or pylon signs. During the development’s September 16, 1992 Planning Commission meeting, commissioners discussed concerns related to superfluous signage as it pertained to Target’s proposed pharmacy sign; ultimately, they decided to support the presence of the pharmacy sign on the Target building because it advertised a service not present at all Targets. As a separate issue, the Planning Commission also discussed the fact that the Target would be allowed signage along W. 78th Street under the general sign code, which was not being requested. One commissioner indicated that they felt signage along W. 78th Street might make the development “friendlier” and help break up the large expanse of wall; however, no action was taken on the comment as Target felt the proposed signage was sufficient. Target’s recent remodel has added a new liquor store section with a separate entrance in the northeast corner of the store. Since this is a new service not found in many Targets and which, due to the separate entrance, functions largely as a separate store, Target feels that additional signage is necessary to market the liquor store. Locating a sign near the intersection providing access to Target’s parking lot facing 78th Street West is the most effective location for the sign. Staff agrees that the proposed signage is not redundant and that its proposed location is not problematic. Target Proposed North Elevation Since multiple buildings within the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD already have signage along more than two elevations and signage within the development already faces north, south, east, and west, it would be appropriate to remove the existing provision restricting signage to a maximum of two street frontages. Amending the PUD to remove that provision would allow the PUD to be governed by the city’s general sign code’s restrictions limiting signage to elevations where a building has street frontage. ALTERNATIVES 1) Remove the provision limiting wall signage within the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to two street frontages. 2) Amend the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD to limit signage to three street frontages. 3) Add a provision allowing Chanhassen Retail Center’s major tenant signage along three street frontages. 4) Retain Chanhassen Retail Center’s existing two street frontage limit. Planning Commission Chanhassen Retail Center (Target) – Planning Case 2018-15 September 4, 2018 Page 5 of 5 RECOMMENDATION Staff believes that Alternative 1 would provide for equal treatment for all businesses within the Chanhassen Retail Center PUD and would be consistent with the guidelines outlined within the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” Should the Planning Commission recommend denial of the proposed PUD amendment, it is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the following motion: “The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council deny the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15; and adopts of the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation.” If adopted the amended portion of the Chanhassen Retail PUD would be amended as follows: 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than 2 street frontages. The total of all wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total area of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted ATTACHMENTS 1. Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance as of February 8, 2010 2. Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Ordinance Amendment 2018-15 3. Findings of Fact and Recommendation (Approval) 4. Findings of Fact and Recommendation (Denial) 5. Development Review Application 6. Chanhassen PUD Amendment Cover Letter 7. Elevations 8. Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Mailing G:\PLAN\2018 Planning Cases\18-15 Target PUD amendment\Staff Report_Target PUD Amendment.docx 1 CHANHASSEN RETAIL CENTER Approved 9/28/92 Amended 2/8/ 2010 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS a. Intent The purpose of this zone is to create a PUD commercial/retail zone. The use of the PUD zone is to allow for more flexible design standards while creating a higher quality and more sensitive proposal. All utilities are required to be placed underground. Each lot proposed for development shall proceed through site plan review based on the development standards outlined below. The Central Business District regulations shall apply except as modified by this ordinance. b. Permitted Uses The permitted uses in this zone should be limited to appropriate commercial and service uses consistent with the City’s CBD development goals. The uses shall be limited to those as defined herein. If there is a question as to the whether or not a use meets the definition, the City Council shall make that interpretation. 1. Day Care Center 2. Standard Restaurants 3. Health and recreation clubs 4. Retail 5. Financial Institutions, including drive-in service * 6. Newspaper and small printing offices 7. Veterinary Clinic 8. Animal Hospital 9. Offices 10. Health Care Facility 11. Garden Center (completely enclosed) 12. Bars and Taverns 13. Fast Food Restaurants (Maximum of 2) * • Drive-thru’s should be buffered from all public views. c. Setbacks Per City Code. d. Development Standards Tabulation Box USE Lot Area Bldg sq Ft. Parking Permitted Use 20,000 sq. ft. NA Per code 2 e. Building Materials and Design The PUD requires that the development demonstrate a higher quality of architectural standards and site design. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with material compatible to the building. 1. All materials shall be of high quality and durable. Masonry material shall be used. Color shall be introduced through colored block or panels and not painted block. Painted surfaces shall be allowed on the Target Store only. 2. Brick may be used and must be approved to assure uniformity. 3. Block shall have a weathered face or be polished, fluted, or broken face. 4. Concrete may be poured in place, tilt-up or pre-cast, and shall be finished in stone, textured or coated. 5. Metal standing seam siding will not be approved except as support material to one of the above materials or curtain wall on office components. 6. All accessory structures shall be designed to be compatible with the primary structure. 7. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by pitched roofs, except for the Target store shall have a parapet wall for screening. Wood screen fences are prohibited. Screening shall consist of compatible materials. 8. All outlots shall be designed with similar material and colors as Target. (Target will be the first store to build and they will establish or set the theme.) 10. All buildings on Outlot B shall have a pitched roof line. f. Site Landscaping and Screening In addition, to adhere to the higher quality of development as spelled out in the PUD zone, all loading areas shall be screened. Each lot for development shall submit a separate landscaping plan as a part of the site plan review process. 1. All open spaces and non-parking lot surfaces (outlot) shall be landscaped, or covered with plantings and/or lawn material. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited. 3 3. The master landscape plan for the Target PUD shall be the design guide for all of the specific site landscape developments. Each lot must present a landscape plan for approval with the site plan review process. 4. Loading areas shall be screened from public right-of-ways. Wing wall may be required where deemed appropriate. 5. Outlot B shall be seeded and maintained in a weed free condition in all areas proposed for future development. g. Signage One freestanding pylon sign shall be permitted for Target. This site is limited to a monument sign. 1. Each property shall be allowed one monument sign. Monument signage shall be subject to the monument standards in the sign ordinance. 2. Wall signs are permitted on no more than 2 street frontages. The total of all wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the total area of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted. 3. All signs require a separate sign permit. 4. The signage will have consistency throughout the development and shall tie the building materials to be consistent with the signs. This includes the freestanding wall and monument signs. Signs shall be an architecture feature, they shall not be solely mounted on a pole of a foundation. A common theme will be introduced at the development's entrance monument and will be used throughout. 5. Consistency in signage shall relate to color, size, materials, and heights. h. Lighting 1. All light fixtures shall be shielded high pressure sodium fixtures or LED. Light level for site lighting shall be no more than 1/2 candle at the property line. This does not apply to street lighting. 2. Glare, whether direct or reflected, as differentiated from general illumination, shall not be visible beyond the limits of the site from which it originates. 3. Lights shall be on a photoelectric cell to turn them on and off automatically as activated by yearly conditions. 4. Light poles shall be Corten, shoe box light standards. CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. ----- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE CHANHASSEN CITY CODE, THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 20 of the Chanhassen City Code, the City's zoning ordinance, is hereby amended by amending the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Standards, Section g. Signage, subsection 2 to read as follows: 2. The total of all wall mounted sign display areas shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total area of the building wall upon which the signs are mounted Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (Published in the Chanhassen Villager on ___________, 2018) g:\plan\2018 planning cases\18-15 target pud amendment\chanhassen retail center ordinance amendment 2018-15.doc CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of The City of Chanhassen to amend the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development. On September 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Target for a Planned Unit Development Amendment. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed application preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and recommended approval of the proposed amendment. On September 24, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the applicant of Target for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development District. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail Addition; Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail 2nd Addition; Lots 1-3, Chanhassen Retail 3rd Addition; Lots 1-2, Block 3, Burdick Park Addition; and, Lot 1, Block 1, Chanhassen Retail 4th Addition. 4. The proposed amendment to the PUD is consistent with the guidelines outlined within the comprehensive plan. 5. The planning report #2018-15, dated September 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters is incorporated herein. DECISION The Chanhassen City Council approves the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY:___________________________________ Denny Laufenburger, Mayor CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (DENIAL) IN RE: Application of The City of Chanhassen to amend the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development. On September 4, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Target for a Planned Unit Development Amendment. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed application preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and recommended approval of the proposed amendment. On September 24, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the applicant of Target for a Planned Unit Development Amendment and now makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Planned Unit Development District. 2. The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Commercial. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail Addition; Outlot A, Chanhassen Retail 2nd Addition; Lots 1-3, Chanhassen Retail 3rd Addition; Lots 1-2, Block 3, Burdick Park Addition; and, Lot 1, Block 1, Chanhassen Retail 4th Addition. 4. The proposed amendment to the PUD is not consistent with the guidelines outlined within the comprehensive plan. 5. The planning report #2018-15, dated September 4, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters is incorporated herein. DECISION The Chanhassen City Council denies the Chanhassen Retail Center Planned Unit Development Amendment 2018-15. ADOPTED by the Chanhassen City Council this 24th day of September, 2018. CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY:___________________________________ Denny Laufenburger, Mayor ?c Utt- ts I-n.^> COMMUNlTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division -7700 Market Boulevard Mailing Address - P.O. Box 147 , Chanhassen, MN 55317 Phone: (952) 227-1300 / Fax: (952) 227-1110 CITY OT CIIAI.IHASSII'I APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW submittaroate:) 1,If<pc ort"tL'l-l !-L cc Date:1a:Ll-IL 60-Day ReviewDate:tollil* (Refer to the appropriate Application Checklist for required submiftal information that must accompany this application) trtr tr tr Comprehensive Plan Amendment ..... $600 ! Minor MUSA line for failing on-site sewers ..... $100 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) fl Single-Family Residence ................................ $325 E All Others......... ........ $425 lnterim Use Permit (lUP) ! ln conjunction with Single-Family Residence.. $325fl All others......... ........ $425 Rezoning (REZ) fl Planned Unit Development (PUD) .................. $750 EI Minor Amendment to existing PUD................. $100 fl All others......... ........ $500 Sign Plan Review........ ...$150 Site Plan Review (SPR) E Administrative.......... .................... $100 E Commercial/lndustrial Districts* .. $500 Plus $10 per 1 ,000 square feet of building area:(_ thousand square feet) "lnclude number of g1g{149 employees:.lnclude number of ryemployees:E Residential Districts. .................... $500 Plus $5 per dwelling unit (_ units) Subdivision (SUB) E Create 3 lots or less ............. ....... $300! Create over 3 |ots.......................$600 + $15 per lot( lots)E Metes & Bounds (2lots) ..............$300 E Consolidate 1ots....... ...................$150 ! Lot Line Adjustment............... ......$150I rina|P1at.............. ....$700 (lncludes $450 escrow for attorney costs)* "Additional escrow may be required for other applications through the development contract. Vacation of Easements/Right-of-way (VAC)........ $300 (Additional recording fees may apply) Variance (VAR) .. .. $200 Wetland Alteration Permit (WAP) E Single-family Residence............................... $1 50 fl Ail others......... ......$2Zs Zoning Appeal........ ...... $100 Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) ................. $500 NOTE: When multiple applications are processed concurrently, the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application. u tr tr tr tr tr tr h x tr Property Owners' List within 500' (city to generate after pre-apptication meeting) ............:....... ...... $3 per address ( I l. addresses) Escrow for Recording Documents (check all that apply)... $50 per document E Site Plan Agreement E Wetland Alteration Permit E Conditional Use Permit E lnterim Use Permit ! Vacation E Variance E Metes & Bounds Subdivision (3 docs.) fl Easements ( easements)BrTl"E:+3:r,,.oo Description of Proposal: Adding a "Wine & Spirits" sign to the north side of the Target building 851 W 78th St, Chanhassen, MN 55317 qq lziF-t.1- [l*r^- Property Address or Location: Parcel#: 2518400'10 Legal Description:LOT 1 EXC: That part of Lot '1, Block 1, Chanhassen Retail Addition TotalAcreage:10.06 Wetlands Present? ! Yes Z ruo Present Zoning:Central Business District (CBD)Requested Zoning: Central Business District (CBD) Present Land Use Designation: Commercial Requested Land Use Designation:Commercial Existing Use of Property: Retail ECheck box if separate narrative is attached. Section 1:allthat Section 2: Reouired lnformation APPLICANT OTHER THAN PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as applicant, represent to have obtained authorization from the property owner to file this application. I agree to be bound by conditions of approval, subject only to the right to object at the hearings on the application or during the appeal period. lf this application has not been signed by the property owner, I have attached separate documentation of full legal capacity to file the application. This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name:Leila Bunge (Kimley-Horn & Associates)Contact: Leila Bunge Address:2550 University Ave W, 238N Phone:(763) 251-1015 St. Paul, MN 55113 Cell: Fax: Date:7131118 PROPERTY OWNER: ln signing this application, l, as property owner, have full legal capacity to, and hereby do, authorize the filing of this application. I understand that conditions of approval are binding and agree to be bound by those conditions, subject only to the right to object at the hearings or during the appeal periods. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees, feasibility studies, etc. with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study. I certify that the information and exhibits submitted are true and correct. Name:Eames Gilmore Contact: Eames Gilmore Address:50 South 1Oth Street #400, TP3-1 1 140 Phone: Cell: (612) 761-1585 City/State/Zip:Minneapolis, MN 55403 Email:Fax: Signature:Date:7t31t18 This application must be completed in full and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions. Before filing this application, refer to the appropriate Application Checklist and confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and applicable procedural requirements and fees. A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal. A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application. PROJECT ENGINEER (if applicable) Name:Contact: Phone:Address: City/State/Zip: Email: Cell: Fax: leila.bunge@kimley-horn.com Who should receive copies of staff reports?*Other Contact I nformation : Name:Via: Via: Via: Via: trZtrtr Property Owner Applicant Engineer Other" fl Email E Email E Email E Email E trlaiteO Paper Copy f] ttlaiteo Paper Copy ! lvtaiteO Paper Copy E naaieo Paper Copy Address: City/State/Zip: Email: INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Complete all necessary form fields, then select SAVE FORM to save a copy to your device. PRINT FORM and deliver to city along with required documents and payment. SUBMIT FORM to send a digital copy to the city for processing. Section 3:Owner and lnformation City/State/Zip: Email: Signature: Section 4: Notification lnformation kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 July 31, 2018 City of Chanhassen Department of Planning and Zoning 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 Re: Target (T-0862) Target PUD Amendment 851 W 78th St Chanhassen, MN 55317 Dear Mr. Walters, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. serves as the engineering consultant for Target, who is seeking a PUD amendment of the Chanhassen Retail Center for the building at 851 W 78th Street, Chanhassen, MN. The PUD amendment is being submitted to include a “Wine & Spirits” sign as a permitted exterior wall sign on the north side of the building. Target has recently remodeled the Chanhassen store with façade and signage improvements, which included a new liquor section. Since Target completed the liquor section, they have found that the current signage is not advertising the service very well to customers. The addition of the “Wine & Spirits” sign on the north elevation will provide more visibility to the store and new liquor section from 78th Street, which is the main street facing the store. We respectfully request to be on your next Planning Commission agenda. Thank you for your time and comments on the initial submittal. If you have any more questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at 763-251-1015 or Leila.bunge@kimley-horn.com. Sincerely, Leila Bunge Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Phone: 763-251-1015 Email: Leila.bunge@kimley-horn.com Attachments: 1 – Development Review Application 2 – Elevations (Proposed Front vs. Existing Front) 3 – Property Deed (IITVOf,. CHANEASSEN t-n'nvpn emNNEPTN COUNTIES NOTICE OT PUBLIC HEARING ""ffitS,to#*I3"'31*'fithat the Chanhassen Plannrng i:iil"iiissio" will hotd a Public ilJi"i-i-g o" t"esday, September a:frrg it t'Jo P.m. iir'the council dfiilG;s i" Chanhassen CitY ffii:'it-o-o Market BIvd' The ""itios. of this hearing is to I"'"ii-aei an amendment to the iiffi ui-u"it oevelopment (PUD) iriTiieet to allow adding- a^.iit t6in" north side of the ;;:iilft ;i the property located ^iGi {f"ii1aut'Str6et and zoned Fi;;";d unit DeveloPm-ent ?P-uoi. ePPticant: Kimley'Horn Ina-A-tJoiirt"s, owner: Target Corporation. . 1r-- r^^^]i^6 Affidavit of Publication Southwest Newspapers State of Minnesota) )SS. County of Carver ) Laurie A. Hartmann, being duly sworn, on oath says that she is the publisher or the authorized agent ofthe publisher ofthe newspapers known as the Chaska Herald and the Chanhassen Vil- lager and has full knowledge ofthe facts herein stated as follows: (A) These newspapers have complied with the requiremen-ts constituting_qualification as a legal ne'fuspaper, as piovioed by Minn-esota statute 331A.02,331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printed public notice that is attached to this Affidavit and identifie a asNo. ? [' )-) ivas putiistreO on the date or dates and in the newspaper stated. in the attached Noticd and sdid Notiie is hereby incorporated as part of this Affidavit. SaiO notice was cut from the columns of the newspaper -specifirld. Printedbelow is a copy of the lower cas9 alphabetfrom A to Z, both inclusive, aird ishereby acknowledged as being the kind and size of type used in the composition and publication of the Notice: 'iolrn-it owing the location ttri-oroposal ls availableor fi;;;;p"iai-is available iot iirUti. r-eview.on !hg-t-tl{t abcdefghij klmnopqrstuvwxyz Subscribed and swom before me on JYMME JEANNETTE BAHK NOTABY PUBLIC . MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01I31/23 RATE INFORMATION Lowest classifled rate paid by commercial users for comparable space.... S31.20 per column inch Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter... ...... $3 1.20 per column inch Rate actually charged forthe above matter... $12.97 per column inch ief's ite-at www.ci.chanhaqsin' ffii;J;o'ig:is ;; qi citv Hallmn.us/2018-15 or at CIIY trau duiine regutar business Jro-urslilffit".i.a P""-*s are invited io attend this Public hearrn-gi"-iiTii,a -ttrft Public hearing ,irJ Lirii"tJ ttt"ir opinions withand exPress respecfto t]ris"Jcfto tnis proYisat. fu aixenzie Watters, Assistant Planner Email: mwalters(4 ci.chanhassen'mn'us P}ilofue, 932-227'L132 (Published in the Chanhassen Viuigeion Thursday August 23' 2018: No.4623) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Approve Agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for the Bluff Creek Southwest Branch Stabilization & Restoration Project Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: I.3. Prepared By Vanessa Strong, Water Resources Coordinator File No: SWMP­12: 17­01 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves an agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for the Bluff Creek Southwest Branch Stabilization & Restoration Project". Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The proposed Bluff Creek Restoration project includes the restoration of a segment of Bluff Creek (1,438 feet) and one of its tributaries (284 feet). This project has been identified in the city's CIP for 2018 to improve the water quality in the creek. Bluff Creek does not meet state water quality standards. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requires the city to reduce the amount of pollution entering the creek and has assigned the city a Waste Load Allocation (a numerical pollution reduction target). This project helps achieve that goal. The project is funded through a city contribution of $50,000 and a joint partnership with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and a Clean Water Land and Legacy grant for an additional $250,000. The segment of Bluff Creek and its tributary being restored is immediately downstream of Audubon Road (Co. Rd. 15). The main stem of Bluff Creek has been subject to significant erosion and downcutting of the channel bed, resulting in five to six­foot tall vertical banks throughout most of the reach. This reach of Bluff Creek remains unstable and is contributing eroded sediment downstream while no longer maintaining active connection with its floodplain. The side ravine tributary to this reach includes a five­foot headcut that is migrating upstream towards a wetland. Continued migration of this headcut will result in draining of the upstream wetland. The purpose of this project is to stabilize this reach of Bluff Creek and its tributary and reduce the transport of eroded material downstream. The project includes the placement of fill within both the main stem of Bluff Creek and its tributary to improve connection to the floodplain. The channel shape and capacity have been designed to minimize shear stress for the stream's baseflow and the 100­year design storm. In addition, rock riffles and root wads will be placed in the channel at key locations to ensure future stability of the channel. The bed of the tributary ravine will also be raised to reconnect with the upstream elevation of the existing headcut. This ravine bottom will have a turf reinforcement mat installed and will be vegetated. Velocities will be lowered through the decrease in ravine slope. Two other alternatives were considered for stabilization of the reach. One alternative used frequent check dams to CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, September 24, 2018SubjectApprove Agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for the Bluff CreekSouthwest Branch Stabilization & Restoration ProjectSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: I.3.Prepared By Vanessa Strong, Water ResourcesCoordinator File No: SWMP­12: 17­01PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves an agreement with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District for the BluffCreek Southwest Branch Stabilization & Restoration Project".Approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe proposed Bluff Creek Restoration project includes the restoration of a segment of Bluff Creek (1,438 feet) andone of its tributaries (284 feet). This project has been identified in the city's CIP for 2018 to improve the water qualityin the creek. Bluff Creek does not meet state water quality standards. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agencyrequires the city to reduce the amount of pollution entering the creek and has assigned the city a Waste LoadAllocation (a numerical pollution reduction target). This project helps achieve that goal. The project is funded througha city contribution of $50,000 and a joint partnership with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District and aClean Water Land and Legacy grant for an additional $250,000.The segment of Bluff Creek and its tributary being restored is immediately downstream of Audubon Road (Co. Rd.15). The main stem of Bluff Creek has been subject to significant erosion and downcutting of the channel bed, resultingin five to six­foot tall vertical banks throughout most of the reach. This reach of Bluff Creek remains unstable and iscontributing eroded sediment downstream while no longer maintaining active connection with its floodplain. The sideravine tributary to this reach includes a five­foot headcut that is migrating upstream towards a wetland. Continuedmigration of this headcut will result in draining of the upstream wetland.The purpose of this project is to stabilize this reach of Bluff Creek and its tributary and reduce the transport of erodedmaterial downstream. The project includes the placement of fill within both the main stem of Bluff Creek and itstributary to improve connection to the floodplain. The channel shape and capacity have been designed to minimizeshear stress for the stream's baseflow and the 100­year design storm. In addition, rock riffles and root wads will beplaced in the channel at key locations to ensure future stability of the channel. The bed of the tributary ravine will alsobe raised to reconnect with the upstream elevation of the existing headcut. This ravine bottom will have a turfreinforcement mat installed and will be vegetated. Velocities will be lowered through the decrease in ravine slope. Two other alternatives were considered for stabilization of the reach. One alternative used frequent check dams to raise the channel bed, while the other alternative used several cross vanes to raise the channel bed. Both of these options relied on deposition processes post construction to raise the bed over time. The chosen alternative is a hybrid of the second option that uses several cross vanes combined with channel and bank grading/fill. Due to the high level of channel incision, the sole use of structures and bank grading to stabilize the reach would not have effectively reduced the channel velocities and shear stresses enough to fully result in a stream that was reconnected with the floodplain. Therefore, it was determined that additional grading of the channel banks and the restoration of the channel bed invert (raising through fill) would be necessary to best meet the stabilization goals of the project. The proposed project is anticipated to begin construction in the fall of 2018. A neighborhood meeting was held on June 13, 2018.   The city attorney has reviewed the agreement.  ATTACHMENTS: Project Location Map Picture of creek erosion Agreement Project Location COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AND RILEY-PURGATORY-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BLUFF CREEK SOUTHWEST BRANCH STABILIZATION AND RESTORATION PROJECT This cooperative agreement is made by and between the City of Chanhassen (Chanhassen), a Minnesota municipal corporation, and the Riley-Purgatory-Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD), a watershed district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B and 103D, to achieve shared water-resource protection and improvement goals through design, construction and maintenance of the Bluff Creek Southwest Branch Stabilization and Restoration Project in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota. Recitals WHEREAS RPBCWD has an approved water resources management plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 103B.231 (the Plan) that has as a primary goal addressing all impairments in water resources in RPBCWD’s jurisdiction and removing all RPBCWD waterbodies from the State of Minnesota impaired waters list; WHEREAS in 2002 Bluff Creek was listed on the 303(d) list of impaired waters for elevated turbidity levels, and in 2004 the creek was placed on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s list of impaired waters in need of a Total Maximum Daily Load study for impaired biota due to low fish index of biotic integrity scores; in 2013 RPBCWD published an implementation plan identifying projects that would reduce sediment loads to the creek and address habitat fragmentation; WHEREAS a 2015 Creek Restoration Assessment Strategy report evaluated segments of all creeks in RPBCWD and prioritized reach BT3A for restoration; WHEREAS in January 2017 the RPBCWD engineer produced a Bluff Creek Stream Stabilization Assessment that provides concept plans for the stabilization of reach BT3A, including repair of erosion and channel cutting in Bluff Creek reach BT3A to reduce the transport of sediment downstream to other sections of Bluff Creek and Rice Lake (the Project, as defined in greater detail under Paragraph 1 of this Contract); WHEREAS on May 15, 2017, following a duly noticed public hearing, the RPBCWD Board of Managers adopted a proposed watershed management plan amendment, adding the Bluff Creek Stream Stabilization and Restoration Project to the capital improvements program in the Plan and, following a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 103B.251, ordered the Project; August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 2 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project WHEREAS the Project is planned to be constructed on property owned by Chanhassen (the Chanhassen Parcel), and on an adjacent privately owned parcel (the Private Parcel), as depicted in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (together, the parcels are referred to herein as the Project Area); WHEREAS at a January 2018 informational meeting conducted jointly by RPBCWD and Chanhassen, watershed residents expressed support for the Project; WHEREAS Chanhassen operates its stormwater-management system under the state Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System general permit, and construction and maintenance of the Project will accrue to the benefit of Chanhassen’s fulfillment of its obligations under the permit; and WHEREAS Chanhassen and RPBCWD are authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 471.59 to enter into this cooperative agreement for the Project. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, CHANHASSEN AND RPBCWD enter into this agreement to document their understanding as to the scope of the Project, reaffirm their commitments as to the general responsibilities for and tasks to be undertaken by the parties, dedicate the necessary rights to the use of property owned by Chanhassen, and facilitate communication and cooperation to successfully complete the Project. 1 Project. The Project is defined and specified for purposes of this cooperative agreement and the parties’ implementation thereof as consisting of the following: 1.1 PROPERTY ACQUISITION. Land-use rights necessary to construct and maintain the Project. 1.2 DESIGN. Design and preparation of all necessary construction documents (plan sheets, drawings, technical specifications) for the Project. Eighty percent designs and plans for the Project are attached to and incorporated into this agreement as Exhibit B). Exhibit B includes and the final design will incorporate: construction access and grading; repair of eroded banks and channel cutting; construction of rock riffles; re-grading the channel thalweg; placing root wads on creek banks; placing fieldstone; and restoring banks through seeding and installation of erosion control blanket. 1.3 CONSTRUCTION. The Project will be constructed by a contractor under contract to RPBCWD and with construction oversight and management by the RPBCWD engineer. Construction will include advance determination and procurement of permits and other regulatory approvals necessary for the Project. Construction documents will provide for a three-year warranty on vegetation. August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 3 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project 1.4 MAINTENANCE. RPBCWD will refine and Chanhassen will approve and implement the plan for the post-construction maintenance of the Project (the Maintenance Plan). The final Maintenance Plan will identify reporting to be completed and delineate routine maintenance and repair of the Project. 2 Costs 2.1 In accordance with subsection 4.3 herein, Chanhassen will contribute the land-use rights needed for the Project on the Chanhassen Parcel at no out-of-pocket cost to either party. 2.2 RPBCWD will be responsible for the costs for design, construction, construction oversight and management, and development and finalization of the Maintenance Plan for the Project, as described herein. RPBCWD will be responsible for the costs and fees associated with complying with regulatory requirements applicable to the Project, except that Chanhassen will assess no fee to RPBCWD for city permits required for the Project, if any. 2.2 Chanhassen will be responsible for $50,000 of Project costs and the costs of routine post-construction maintenance of the Project as defined and specified in the final Maintenance Plan. 2.3 Each of the parties will bear its administrative costs of fulfilling its responsibilities and obligations under this agreement, and costs incurred in providing and conducting public education, outreach and meetings for the Project. And in the event of cancellation in accordance with subsection 3.5 herein or Chanhassen’s failure to approve the design and plans for the Project as provided in subsection 4.1 herein, each party will bear its costs incurred prior to RPBCWD’s issuance of notice in accordance with subsection 5.8 herein. 3 RPBCWD’s Specific Rights and Duties 3.1 RPBCWD will endeavor to obtain the land-use rights on the Private Parcel for the Project. RPBCWD will attempt to obtain the necessary rights at no cost. In its sole discretion, RPBCWD may elect to omit a portion or portions of the Project because of a failure to obtain rights necessary, in RPBCWD’s judgment, to construct and maintain the Project. RPBCWD will retain sole discretion to determine that adequate public benefit will be obtained from the investment of public funds in the construction of the Project in general and as pertains to any particular property or properties. 3.2 RPBCWD has contracted with the RPBCWD engineer for the development of the plans and design for the Project, along with the specifications and all other necessary August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 4 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project construction documentation, as well as the Maintenance Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, RPBCWD makes no warranty to Chanhassen regarding the RPBCWD engineer’s or another third party’s performance in design, construction or construction management for the Project. RPBCWD has submitted and Chanhassen will approve, by signing this agreement, the final (90 percent) design and plans for the Project in accordance with paragraph 4.1 below. The RPBCWD engineer will prepare contract documents for bidding in accordance with state procurement law. 3.3 RPBCWD will contract for the construction of the Project in accordance with applicable public-procurement law, as determined by RPBCWD, and will ensure that the Project, when constructed, is compatible with the Property Area and this agreement. RPBCWD will award and enter a contract for the construction of the Project (Contract) that will: a. Require the contractor to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Chanhassen, its officers, council members, employees and agents from any and all actions, costs, damages and liabilities of any nature arising from the contractor’s negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty, or a subcontractor’s negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty owed by the contractor to RPBCWD. The contract will require that for any claim subject to indemnification by an employee of selected contractor or a subcontractor, the indemnification obligation is not limited by a limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the contractor or a subcontractor under workers’ compensation acts, disability acts or other employee benefit acts. b. Require that the contractor name Chanhassen as an additional insured with primary coverage for general liability on a noncontributory basis for both ongoing work and completed operations to the extent of RPBCWD’s statutory liability limit. c. Extend all product warranties and workmanship guaranties under the Contract to Chanhassen. 3.4 As between the parties and with the assistance and cooperation of Chanhassen, RPBCWD will obtain all permits, licenses and other necessary approvals for itself and Chanhassen from entities with regulatory authority, including but not limited to the necessary approval to access the Chanhassen Parcel from Carver County right of way, as determined by RPBCWD, and will ensure that the Project is completed in accordance with applicable law and regulatory standards and criteria. 3.5 RPBCWD, or the RPBCWD engineer on RPBCWD’s behalf, will oversee the construction of the Project. RPBCWD may adjust the plans, design and specifications for August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 5 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project the Project during construction in consultation with Chanhassen, as long as the revised plans do not require RPBCWD to exceed the scope of the rights granted under this agreement or create maintenance obligations not anticipated hereunder. Until completion of construction, if RPBCWD, in its judgment, should decide that the Project is infeasible, RPBCWD, at its option, may declare this agreement rescinded and annulled. If RPBCWD so declares, all obligations herein, performed or not, will be voided; RPBCWD will return the portions of Chanhassen Parcel materially to their preexisting condition or to a condition agreed on by Chanhassen and RPBCWD to the extent the Chanhassen property has been physically disturbed by RPBCWD, its contractor, agents or assigns. 3.6 Within 90 days of certification of the Project as substantially complete for the intended purposes RPBCWD will provide as-built construction drawings of the Project to Chanhassen and the final draft Maintenance Plan. 4 Chanhassen’s Specific Rights and Duties, and Grant of Access, Construction and Maintenance Rights 4.1 On submission from RPBCWD, Chanhassen will have 30 days to approve the design and plans for the Project. Failure to timely act will constitute approval. Chanhassen’s authority to approve plans and specifications will not be unreasonably exercised. 4.2 Chanhassen will cooperate with RPBCWD’s efforts to obtain permits and approvals needed for the Project and act to facilitate proper and efficient processing of applications for city approvals. 4.3 LAND-USE RIGHTS. a. Chanhassen hereby grants to RPBCWD, its contractors, agents and assigns a temporary and nonexclusive license to access and use the Chanhassen Parcel, legally described in Exhibit C attached hereto solely for the purpose of access to the Project Area and construction of the Project. RPBCWD, on reasonable notice to Chanhassen, may temporarily restrict or preclude public access to the Project Area to ensure safety while construction activities are under way. b. Chanhassen will forbear from any activity that unreasonably interferes with the RPBCWD’s ability to exercise its rights or meet its obligations under this agreement, including the transfer of ownership of the Chanhassen Parcel. Subject to its interest in preserving public safety, Chanhassen will facilitate RPBCWD’s reasonable exercise of its rights under this agreement with regard to access to and use of the Chanhassen Parcel. . August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 6 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project c. On completion of construction of the Project, Chanhassen will retain ownership of the portions of the Project on the Chanhassen Parcel. 4.4 On receipt from RPBCWD of documentation of construction costs under the Contract, Chanhassen will reimburse RPBCWD in accordance with paragraph 2.2. 4.5 On approval of the Maintenance Plan, Chanhassen will perform all maintenance and monitoring of the Project in accordance with the Maintenance Plan, along with reporting required by the Maintenance Plan. The Maintenance Plan may be revised for purposes of finalization on mutual agreement of the parties. Chanhassen will notify RPBCWD of any need for major repair or maintenance of the Project (beyond the scope of the Maintenance Plan), and the parties in good faith will develop a collaborative approach to designing and implementing major repairs or maintenance. If Chanhassen disapproves the Maintenance Plan, all maintenance necessary to assure that the Project will continue to effectively function as designed will become the sole responsibility of Chanhassen. 4.6 Chanhassen may conduct data-collection and analysis on the performance of the Project in reducing loading of sediment and other pollutants to Bluff Creek, and may utilize all credit toward compliance with goals and requirements imposed by state and federal regulatory programs, such as through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System as applied to Chanhassen. 5 General Terms 5.1 INDEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP; LIABILITY. This agreement does not create a joint powers board or organization within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59, and neither party agrees to be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other pursuant to subdivision 1(a) of the statute. Only contractual remedies are available for the failure of a party to fulfill the terms of this agreement. Chanhassen and RPBCWD enter this agreement solely for the purposes of improving the ecological health and condition of Bluff Creek in Chanhassen. Accordingly, with respect to any and all activity undertaken pursuant to this agreement, Chanhassen and RPBCWD each agree to hold the other harmless, and defend and indemnify the other, its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, claim, damage or expense (including reasonable attorney fees, costs and disbursements) that the indemnified party may incur as a result of the Project due to any negligent or willful act or omission by the indemnifying party or the indemnifying party’s breach of any specific contractual duty. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this agreement, Chanhassen’s and RPBCWD’s obligations under this paragraph will survive the termination of the agreement. August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 7 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project This agreement creates no right in and waives no immunity, defense or liability limitation with respect to any third party. As between the parties, only contract remedies are available for a breach of this agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, RPBCWD will not be deemed to have acquired by entry into or performance under this agreement, any form of interest or ownership in or to any portion of the land that is the site of the construction of the Project or adjacent property. RPBCWD will not by entry into or performance under this agreement be deemed to have exercised any form of control over the use, operation or management of any portion of the property that is the site of the Project or adjacent property so as to render RPBCWD a potentially responsible party for any contamination under state and/or federal law. 5.2 PUBLICITY AND ENDORSEMENT. Any publicity regarding the Project must identify Chanhassen and RPBCWD as the sponsoring entities. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for Chanhassen or RPBCWD individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the Project. RPBCWD and Chanhassen will collaborate on the development of educational and informational signage pertinent to the Project, and each party, at its cost, may develop, produce and, after approval of the other party, distribute educational, outreach and publicity materials related to the Project. 5.3 DATA MANAGEMENT. All designs, written materials, technical data, research or any other work-in-progress will be shared between the parties to this agreement on request, except as prohibited by law. As soon as is practicable, the party preparing plans, specifications, contractual documents, materials for public communication or education will provide them to the other party for recordkeeping and other necessary purposes. 5.4 DATA PRACTICES. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this agreement is governed by the Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy 5.5 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement contains the complete and entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, representations and understandings, if any, between the parties respecting such matters. The recitals stated at the outset are incorporated into and a part of the agreement. 5.6 COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This agreement, as it may be amended in writing, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties. Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original agreement or their successors in office. August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 8 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project 5.7 WAIVERS. The waiver by Chanhassen or RPBCWD of any breach or failure to comply with any provision of this agreement by the other party will not be construed as nor will it constitute a continuing waiver of such provision or a waiver of any other breach of or failure to comply with any other provision of this agreement. 5.8 NOTICES, COORDINATION. The parties designate the following authorized representatives, each to serve as the liaison to the other party for purposes of coordinating inspection, construction oversight and maintenance of the Project as provided in this agreement. Any written communication required under this agreement will be addressed to the other party as follows, except that either party may change its address for notice by so notifying the other party in writing: Chanhassen RPBCWD Vanessa Strong, Water Resources Claire Bleser, Administrator Coordinator 18681 Lake Drive East 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 P.O. Box 147 952-607-6512 Chanhassen, MN 55317 952-227-1168 5.9 TERM; TERMINATION. This agreement is effective on execution by both parties and will terminate three years from the date of execution of the latest amendment hereto or on the written agreement of both parties. Any responsibility or obligation that has come into being before expiration, specifically including obligations under paragraphs 1.4, 4.3 and 5.1 herein, will survive expiration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the agreement to be duly executed intending to be bounded thereby. (Signature page follows.) August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 9 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project CITY OF CHANHASSEN MAYOR _______________________________ By: Denny Laufenbuger, Mayor Date: ______________________________ CITY MANAGER _______________________________ By: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Date: ______________________________ RILEY-PURGATORY-BLUFF CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By: _______________________________ By: NAME, President Date: ______________________________ Approved as to form & execution: _____________________________ District counsel August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 10 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project EXHIBIT A Project Area August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 11 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project EXHIBIT B Plans August 8, 2018 Cooperative Agreement 12 Chanhassen-RPBCWD Bluff Creek Stabilization Project Exhibit C Legal Description of License Area for City Property That portion of Outlot B, Liberty on Bluff Creek, Carver County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof lying south of a line extended easterly from the southeast corner of Lot 15, Block 2, Liberty on the Bluff Creek and parallel to the south line of Outlot B, Liberty on Bluff Creek; And The North 306.00 feet of the following described parcel: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 27, Township 116, Range 23 West of the Fifth Principle Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, thence on an assumed bearing of North 00 degrees 28 minutes 53 seconds West, along the east line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 528.00 feet; thence on a bearing of South 89 degrees 31 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 617.10 feet; thence on a bearing of South 00 degrees 28 minutes 53 seconds East, parallel with said east line of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 665.28 feet; thence on a bearing of South 80 degrees 28 minutes 53 seconds East, a distance of 626.58 feet (620.50 feet deeded), to the east line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence on a bearing of North 00 degrees 28 minutes 16 seconds West, along the said east line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 246.08 feet to the point of beginning. Except any portion thereof within MNDOT Right-of-Way Plat No. 10-20. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Review of Claims Paid 09­24­2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: L.1. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on September 24, 2018: Check Numbers Amounts 167860 – 167935 $465,993.08 ACH Payments $363,604.94 Total All Claims $829,598.02 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 9/14/2018 9:07 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount ALLSTR ALLSTREAM 09/06/2018 0.00 490.84167860 APAGRO APACHE GROUP 09/06/2018 0.00 1,387.50167861 ASPMIL ASPEN MILLS 09/06/2018 0.00 578.04167862 AWWA AWWA 09/06/2018 0.00 202.00167863 BCATRA BCA 09/06/2018 0.00 45.00167864 BONCRE Bongards' Creameries 09/06/2018 0.00 161,800.00167865 CENENE CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 0.00 688.12167866 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 0.00 1,850.07167867 CLACCO CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 09/06/2018 0.00 310.06167868 CORMAI CORE & MAIN LP 09/06/2018 0.00 576.54167869 ERSTES ERS Testing LLC 09/06/2018 0.00 5.94167870 FACMOT FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 09/06/2018 0.00 186.12167871 HARTLIFE Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company09/06/2018 0.00 1,027.19167872 HEALSTEV STEVE HEALY 09/06/2018 0.00 98.00167873 HENRSTEV STEVEN HENRIKSEN 09/06/2018 0.00 250.00167874 HERLAN HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 09/06/2018 0.00 66.25167875 JHLAR JH LARSON COMPANY 09/06/2018 0.00 131.40167876 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 09/06/2018 0.00 19,541.00167877 LEAMIN LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 09/06/2018 0.00 30.00167878 MCMCAR MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 09/06/2018 0.00 88.38167879 NRPA NATIONAL REC & PARK ASSOC.09/06/2018 0.00 650.00167880 PEOELE PEOPLES ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS09/06/2018 0.00 623.28167881 PULTGROU Pulte Group Pulte Homes of MN LLC 09/06/2018 0.00 2,500.00167882 RUSTCAND Candace Rust 09/06/2018 0.00 250.00167883 Senja Senja Inc 09/06/2018 0.00 51.20167884 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 09/06/2018 0.00 194.28167885 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 09/06/2018 0.00 166.50167886 StoWel Storms Welding & Mfg, Inc.09/06/2018 0.00 2,823.90167887 TayEle Taylor Electric Company, LLC 09/06/2018 0.00 2,030.00167888 TFOFIN TFORCE FINAL MILE 09/06/2018 0.00 46.41167889 TMSJOH TMS JOHNSON, INC 09/06/2018 0.00 800.00167890 UNIMIN UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 09/06/2018 0.00 30.00167891 VIKELE VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 09/06/2018 0.00 199.10167892 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 0.00 1,060.39167893 WATCOM WATEROUS COMPANY 09/06/2018 0.00 77.05167894 ANEGRO ANE GROUP INC 09/13/2018 0.00 500.00167896 BluCro BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 0.00 77,699.97167897 BERGJOHN Berg-Johnson Associates, Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 1,069.65167898 BORSTA BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 09/13/2018 0.00 1,428.10167899 BRYROC BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 09/13/2018 0.00 4,896.69167900 CAPHOM Capstone Homes Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 3,500.00167901 CHASKA CITY OF CHASKA 09/13/2018 0.00 717.60167902 CLEIRR CLEARWATER IRRIGATION INC 09/13/2018 0.00 195.85167903 CUBFOO CUB FOODS 09/13/2018 0.00 68.01167904 DRAGJOHN JOHN & RENA DRAGSETH 09/13/2018 0.00 750.00167905 EARAND Earl F Andersen Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 58.00167906 FLOTOT FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 09/13/2018 0.00 9.45167907 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (9/14/2018 9:07 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount FULLBLOO FULL BLOOM 09/13/2018 0.00 175.00167908 gonhom GONYEA HOMES 09/13/2018 0.00 5,250.00167909 HEALSTEV STEVE HEALY 09/13/2018 0.00 98.00167910 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 09/13/2018 0.00 1,445.83167911 ISCCom ISC Companies Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 59.67167912 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 09/13/2018 0.00 770.00167913 MECHCLAY Clayten Mechtel 09/13/2018 0.00 150.00167914 METCO2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 09/13/2018 0.00 152,094.89167915 MNTRAN MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 09/13/2018 0.00 606.25167916 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 09/13/2018 0.00 96.00167917 MSFCA MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.09/13/2018 0.00 300.00167918 NEVEROLL Rolland Neve 09/13/2018 0.00 4.00167919 NEWSIG NEWMAN SIGNS INC 09/13/2018 0.00 1,777.48167920 NORHEA Northern Heating & A/C Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 11.38167921 parapart Paragon Party Ponies LLC 09/13/2018 0.00 275.00167922 PHIDec PHI Decks 09/13/2018 0.00 1,000.00167923 PitBow Pitney Bowes Inc.09/13/2018 0.00 105.00167924 PULPLU PULLTABS PLUS INC 09/13/2018 0.00 254.48167925 SamLaw Sam's Lawn & Landscape 09/13/2018 0.00 2,917.45167926 sarljodi Jodi Sarles 09/13/2018 0.00 300.00167927 SHEWIL SHERWIN WILLIAMS 09/13/2018 0.00 423.36167928 SIGNSO SIGNSOURCE 09/13/2018 0.00 204.50167929 SIRLIN SIR LINES-A-LOT 09/13/2018 0.00 390.00167930 SOUSUB Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 0.00 2,366.60167931 SRCM SRCM, LLC 09/13/2018 0.00 1,500.00167932 STELON Stephen Longman Builders Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 500.00167933 TheMus The Mustard Seed, Inc.09/13/2018 0.00 559.66167934 TIMLAN TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC.09/13/2018 0.00 610.65167935 Report Total (75 checks): 465,993.08 0.00 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (9/14/2018 9:07 AM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 9/14/2018 9:07 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-1PASSW 1Password 08/15/2018 0.00 35.88 ACH Z-511TAC 511TACTICAL.COM 08/15/2018 0.00 214.74 ACH Z-AMAZON Amazon 08/15/2018 0.00 2,128.41 ACH Z-AMELEG American Legion 08/15/2018 0.00 51.81 ACH Z-ARAARB Aramark Arboretum 08/15/2018 0.00 681.71 ACH Z-AXELS Axels 08/15/2018 0.00 68.40 ACH Z-BUFWIL Buffalo Wild Wings 08/15/2018 0.00 103.74 ACH Z-CABELA Cabela's 08/15/2018 0.00 107.36 ACH Z-CABFEV Cabin Fever Sporting Goods 08/15/2018 0.00 677.67 ACH Z-CDWG CDW Government 08/15/2018 0.00 677.65 ACH Z-CHANDI Chanhassen Dinner Theatre 08/15/2018 0.00 30.70 ACH Z-CHAFLO Chanhassen Floral 08/15/2018 0.00 65.00 ACH Z-COMSIG ComplianceSigns.com 08/15/2018 0.00 72.50 ACH Z-COSTCO Costco Wholesale 08/15/2018 0.00 693.28 ACH Z-COYMOO Coyote Moon Grille 08/15/2018 0.00 420.00 ACH Z-CUBFOO Cub Foods 08/15/2018 0.00 403.05 ACH Z-DANNER Danner 08/15/2018 0.00 0.00 ACH Z-DICSPO Dick's Sporting Goods 08/15/2018 0.00 128.24 ACH Z-DISMUG DiscountMugs 08/15/2018 0.00 559.00 ACH Z-DUNGAR Dungarees 08/15/2018 0.00 67.96 ACH Z-ECOPRO ECO Products 08/15/2018 0.00 1,771.75 ACH Z-EXPEXC Experts Exchange 08/15/2018 0.00 199.95 ACH Z-FEDEX FedEx Office 08/15/2018 0.00 268.44 ACH Z-FIRSMA Fire Smart Promotions 08/15/2018 0.00 2,069.00 ACH Z-FIROUT First Out Rescue Equipment 08/15/2018 0.00 333.00 ACH Z-FUNEXP Fun Express LLC 08/15/2018 0.00 953.28 ACH Z-GALLS Galls LLC 08/15/2018 0.00 61.60 ACH Z-GUICEN Guitar Center 08/15/2018 0.00 239.76 ACH Z-HACCOM Hach Company 08/15/2018 0.00 241.57 ACH Z-HALCOM Hallock Company 08/15/2018 0.00 103.46 ACH Z-HOMDEP Home Depot 08/15/2018 0.00 2,456.02 ACH Z-ICMA ICMA 08/15/2018 0.00 685.00 ACH Z-KIEPUB Kieran's Pub 08/15/2018 0.00 1,151.26 ACH Z-KWITRI Kwik Trip 08/15/2018 0.00 22.56 ACH Z-LITPAR Litin's Party Value 08/15/2018 0.00 20.03 ACH Z-LOWES Lowes 08/15/2018 0.00 428.43 ACH Z-LUNBYE Lunds & Byerly's 08/15/2018 0.00 282.48 ACH Z-MALWAR Malwarebytes 08/15/2018 0.00 53.58 ACH Z-MAYNAR Maynard's 08/15/2018 0.00 63.54 ACH Z-MCMCAR McMaster-Carr 08/15/2018 0.00 213.23 ACH Z-MERLIN Merlins Ace Hardware 08/15/2018 0.00 18.56 ACH Z-MILFLE Mills Fleet Farm 08/15/2018 0.00 233.92 ACH Z-MNRUR Minnesota Rural Water Association 08/15/2018 0.00 125.00 ACH Z-MNTROP Minnesota Trophies & Gifts 08/15/2018 0.00 161.50 ACH Z-MNAWWA MN American Water Works Association 08/15/2018 0.00 255.00 Page 1 of 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH Z-MNGFOA MN Government Finance Officers Association 08/15/2018 0.00 50.00 ACH Z-NOOCOM Noodles & Company 08/15/2018 0.00 118.11 ACH Z-OAK19 Oak 19 08/15/2018 0.00 19.00 ACH Z-OFFMAX Office Max/Office Depot 08/15/2018 0.00 1,042.87 ACH Z-PARCIT Party City 08/15/2018 0.00 134.73 ACH Z-PIZZAI Pizzaioli 08/15/2018 0.00 134.81 ACH Z-PRIFLU Primary Fluid Systems Inc 08/15/2018 0.00 735.75 ACH Z-REDAME Redstone American Grill 08/15/2018 0.00 66.00 ACH Z-RICBUS Richfield Bus Company 08/15/2018 0.00 568.50 ACH Z-ROTCLU Rotary Club 08/15/2018 0.00 106.00 ACH Z-SAMCLU Sam's Club 08/15/2018 0.00 61.86 ACH Z-SOUMET Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 08/15/2018 0.00 175.00 ACH Z-SOUREN Southwest Rental and Sales 08/15/2018 0.00 48.99 ACH Z-SPRWAR Sprinkler Warehouse 08/15/2018 0.00 738.06 ACH Z-TARGET Target 08/15/2018 0.00 637.64 ACH Z-THEMUS The Mustard Seed 08/15/2018 0.00 137.27 ACH Z-ULTCAR Ultimate Carts LLC 08/15/2018 0.00 352.69 ACH Z-UNDARM Under Armour 08/15/2018 0.00 1,529.45 ACH Z-USWAT US Water Alliance 08/15/2018 0.00 775.00 ACH Z-USABLU USABlueBook 08/15/2018 0.00 157.80 ACH Z-VIKELE Viking Electric Supply 08/15/2018 0.00 91.89 ACH Z-WALMAR Wal-Mart 08/15/2018 0.00 358.06 ACH Z-WHETEC Whel-Tech 08/15/2018 0.00 312.95 ACH Z-WHODIR Wholesale-Direct-First-Aid.com 08/15/2018 0.00 890.49 ACH Z-WWGRAI WW Grainger 08/15/2018 0.00 1,215.21 ACH ACTMIN ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 09/06/2018 0.00 1,728.00 ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 09/06/2018 0.00 108.12 ACH ANCTEC ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 09/06/2018 0.00 74.90 ACH BOYTRU Boyer Truck Parts 09/06/2018 0.00 137.96 ACH PedrChri Christine Lea Pedretti 09/06/2018 0.00 266.50 ACH ESSBRO ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 09/06/2018 0.00 72.50 ACH FASCOM FASTENAL COMPANY 09/06/2018 0.00 31.25 ACH GOPSTA GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 09/06/2018 0.00 807.30 ACH GSDIR GS DIRECT INC 09/06/2018 0.00 1,243.91 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 09/06/2018 0.00 210.00 ACH INDPLA Indelco Plastics Corporation 09/06/2018 0.00 465.57 ACH JasEng Jasper Engineering & Equipment Co 09/06/2018 0.00 1,430.00 ACH JEFFIR JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 09/06/2018 0.00 98.45 ACH MACEQU MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 09/06/2018 0.00 30.67 ACH MRPA MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 09/06/2018 0.00 176.00 ACH MVEC MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 0.00 5,957.33 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/06/2018 0.00 42.14 ACH HLBTAU REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 09/06/2018 0.00 31,200.00 ACH DaniReem Reem Danial 09/06/2018 0.00 50.40 ACH RICLAK RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 09/06/2018 0.00 108,293.35 ACH SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 09/06/2018 0.00 129.70 ACH USABLU USA BLUE BOOK 09/06/2018 0.00 426.42 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 0.00 4,887.17 ACH VIKIND VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 09/06/2018 0.00 118.10 ACH WARLIT Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 09/06/2018 0.00 236.10 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/06/2018 0.00 2,910.52 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 09/06/2018 0.00 287.70 ACH XCEL XCEL ENERGY INC 09/06/2018 0.00 16,632.54 ACH ADAPES ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 09/13/2018 0.00 125.00 ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 5,886.50 Page 2 of 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH ALEAIR ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 09/13/2018 0.00 426.00 ACH OLSOANNI Annika Olson 09/13/2018 0.00 1,943.00 ACH BRAINT BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 09/13/2018 0.00 17,713.50 ACH EURSER EUREKA SERVICES LLC 09/13/2018 0.00 1,199.00 ACH GeaWas Gear Wash, LLC 09/13/2018 0.00 83.42 ACH HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 09/13/2018 0.00 4,628.25 ACH HAWCHE HAWKINS CHEMICAL 09/13/2018 0.00 14,527.17 ACH HeaStr Health Strategies 09/13/2018 0.00 114.00 ACH IMPPOR IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 09/13/2018 0.00 4,774.05 ACH InnOff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 09/13/2018 0.00 495.60 ACH KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 0.00 14,530.00 ACH LEGSER Legacy Services Corporation 09/13/2018 0.00 4,522.30 ACH Marco Marco Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 925.65 ACH MatTri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 09/13/2018 0.00 59.10 ACH MERACE MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 0.00 1,539.70 ACH METCO Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 09/13/2018 0.00 12,300.75 ACH MNLABO MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 09/13/2018 0.00 2,335.95 ACH NAPA NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/13/2018 0.00 1.54 ACH OREAUT O'Reilly Automotive Inc 09/13/2018 0.00 181.65 ACH PioEng Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 09/13/2018 0.00 4,800.00 ACH PRTURF PRO TURF 09/13/2018 0.00 1,459.00 ACH TESSEE TESSMAN SEED CO 09/13/2018 0.00 29.00 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 09/13/2018 0.00 28.40 ACH WarLit Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 09/13/2018 0.00 210.00 ACH WMMUE WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/13/2018 0.00 1,149.66 ACH WSB WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 0.00 59,120.75 ACH WWGRA WW GRAINGER INC 09/13/2018 0.00 287.70 ACH ZEEMED ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 09/13/2018 0.00 98.55 Report Total: 0.00 363,604.94 Page 3 of 3 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM Name Check D Account Description Amount ALLSTREAM 09/06/2018 101-1160-4300 phone system maintenance 10/18/18-11/17/18 490.84 ALLSTREAM 490.84 ANE GROUP INC 09/13/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 2071 West 65th Street 500.00 ANE GROUP INC 500.00 APACHE GROUP 09/06/2018 101-1170-4150 Towels, Hand Soap, Tissue 1,387.50 APACHE GROUP 1,387.50 ASPEN MILLS 09/06/2018 101-1220-4240 Jackets - New Hires 578.04 ASPEN MILLS 578.04 AWWA 09/06/2018 700-0000-4360 Membership renewal- K Crooks 202.00 AWWA 202.00 BCA 09/06/2018 101-1120-4300 Background investigation 45.00 BCA 45.00 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 101-0000-2012 October - Family 38,752.07 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 101-0000-2012 October - Family Cobra 3,497.48 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 700-0000-2012 October - Family 6,457.23 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 701-0000-2012 October - Family 4,708.49 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 720-0000-2012 October - Family 2,544.41 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 101-0000-2012 October - Single 16,723.06 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 210-0000-2012 October - Single 874.64 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 700-0000-2012 October - Single 2,361.52 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 701-0000-2012 October - Single 1,661.81 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 720-0000-2012 October - Single 69.98 BCBSM, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1220-4483 October - Firefighter EAP 49.28 BCBSM, Inc. 77,699.97 Berg-Johnson Associates, Inc 09/13/2018 700-0000-4550 Transmitter, Breather Tube, Aneroid Bellows 1,069.65 Berg-Johnson Associates, Inc 1,069.65 Bongards' Creameries 09/06/2018 815-8221-2024 Security Escrow - Planning Case 2017-16 161,800.00 Bongards' Creameries 161,800.00 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 09/13/2018 101-1370-4510 Lamps, Plug connector 75.50 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 1 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 09/13/2018 101-1220-4530 Plug connectors 498.20 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 09/13/2018 101-1370-4510 Lamps 854.40 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,428.10 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Red Ball Diamond Agg - 7/30, 7/31 3,743.00 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 09/13/2018 420-0000-4751 3" Sc. Clean 223.04 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Red Ball Diamond Agg 454.15 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Red Ball Diamond Agg 476.50 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 4,896.69 Capstone Homes Inc 09/13/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 6337 Teton Ln 3,500.00 Capstone Homes Inc 3,500.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 701-0000-4320 gas charges 20.84 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 101-1170-4320 gas charges 96.90 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 101-1550-4320 gas charges 23.77 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 700-0000-4320 gas charges 16.98 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 101-1370-4320 gas charges 71.64 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 700-0000-4320 gas charges 8.96 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 701-0000-4320 gas charges 8.96 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 700-7019-4320 gas charges 49.25 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 101-1190-4320 gas charges 373.84 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 09/06/2018 101-1600-4320 gas charges 16.98 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 688.12 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1190-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 127.20 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1540-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 95.40 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 15.13 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 700-7019-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 210.27 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 15.13 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1160-4320 phone charges-Aug 2018 250.00 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1170-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 855.22 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 6.36 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 6.36 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1550-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 30.04 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1350-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 30.04 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1220-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 33.04 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1370-4310 phone charges-Aug 2018 50.88 CENTURYLINK 09/06/2018 101-1160-4320 phone charges-Aug 2018 125.00 CENTURYLINK 1,850.07 CITY OF CHASKA 09/13/2018 101-1560-4300 Saints game tickets & Transportation 717.60 CITY OF CHASKA 717.60 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 09/06/2018 101-1320-4240 Safety Vest, Gloves, Self Wicking Birdseye Mesh 310.06 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 310.06 CLEARWATER IRRIGATION INC 09/13/2018 700-7050-4300 Gear driven sprinkler head replaced on 8/14/18 29.50 CLEARWATER IRRIGATION INC 09/13/2018 700-7050-4300 Svc call on 8/14/18 - Labor, Sprinkler heads 166.35 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 2 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount CLEARWATER IRRIGATION INC 195.85 CORE & MAIN LP 09/06/2018 700-0000-4550 Red Hydt Spray Paint 84.00 CORE & MAIN LP 09/06/2018 700-0000-4550 Wat Valve Seat w/o-ring, Main Vlv Rbr Urethane 492.54 CORE & MAIN LP 576.54 CUB FOODS 09/13/2018 101-1220-4350 Station 1 cleaning supplies-wipes, lysol,409 cleaner 16.06 CUB FOODS 09/13/2018 101-1731-4130 Lake Ann Adventure Camp - milk 14.36 CUB FOODS 09/13/2018 101-1540-4130 Ketchup, Buns 15.39 CUB FOODS 09/13/2018 101-1540-4130 Paper Towels, hot dogs 8.78 CUB FOODS 09/13/2018 101-1220-4290 Water, Tape 13.42 CUB FOODS 68.01 DRAGSETH JOHN & RENA 09/13/2018 815-8203-2024 Grading Escrow - 2600 Forest Ave 750.00 DRAGSETH JOHN & RENA 750.00 Earl F Andersen Inc 09/13/2018 101-1550-4560 12x18 HIP MULTI COLOR ON WHITE 58.00 Earl F Andersen Inc 58.00 ERS Testing LLC 09/06/2018 101-0000-2033 Overpayment-permit# 2018-02365 5.94 ERS Testing LLC 5.94 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 09/06/2018 101-1320-4120 DEL 24PG 88865263 93.06 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 09/06/2018 101-1550-4120 DEL 24PG 88865263 93.06 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 186.12 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 09/13/2018 101-1220-4510 Blank Cylinder 9.45 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 9.45 FULL BLOOM 09/13/2018 101-1560-4300 Style Show from the 1950's 175.00 FULL BLOOM 175.00 GONYEA HOMES 09/13/2018 815-8201-2024 Landscaping Escrow - 9401 Kiowa Tr 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 09/13/2018 815-8201-2024 Landscaping Escrow - 9287 Hawkcrest 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 09/13/2018 815-8201-2024 Landscaping Escrow - 7400 Dogwood Rd 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 09/13/2018 815-8201-2024 Landscaping Escrow - 9210 Eagle Ridge Rd 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 09/13/2018 815-8201-2024 Landscaping Escrow - 9265 Eagle Ridge Rd 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 09/13/2018 815-8201-2024 Landscaping Escrow - 9190 Eagle Ct 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 09/13/2018 815-8201-2024 Landscaping Escrow - 9297 Hawkcrest Ct 750.00 GONYEA HOMES 5,250.00 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1120-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 69.45 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1130-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 47.83 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1160-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 24.74 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1250-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 87.85 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1310-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 89.48 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1320-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 112.04 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 3 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1370-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 44.79 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1520-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 35.08 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1530-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 14.05 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1560-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 11.58 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1600-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 22.34 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1700-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 5.59 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1550-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 88.54 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1420-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 73.79 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1430-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 4.67 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 210-0000-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 17.84 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 720-7201-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 5.51 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 720-7202-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 5.51 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1170-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 12.37 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 101-1220-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 42.30 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 701-0000-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 79.12 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 700-0000-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 104.94 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 09/06/2018 720-0000-4040 Sept 2018 insurance premium 27.78 Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 1,027.19 HEALY STEVE 09/06/2018 101-1767-4300 Adult Fall Softball Umpire - 4 games on 8/30/18 98.00 HEALY STEVE 09/13/2018 101-1767-4300 USSSA Fall Softball Team Sanction-4 games 98.00 HEALY STEVE 196.00 HENRIKSEN STEVEN 09/06/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 4100 Pipewood Ln 250.00 HENRIKSEN STEVEN 250.00 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 09/06/2018 101-1550-4150 Yd Pulverized Dirt 66.25 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES INC 66.25 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 09/13/2018 101-0000-2009 09/14/2018 #304303 1,114.58 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 09/13/2018 210-0000-2009 09/14/2018 #304303 25.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 09/13/2018 700-0000-2009 09/14/2018 #304303 152.51 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 09/13/2018 701-0000-2009 09/14/2018 #304303 152.48 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 09/13/2018 720-0000-2009 09/14/2018 #304303 1.26 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 1,445.83 ISC Companies Inc 09/13/2018 101-1190-4530 Gates V Belt 59.67 ISC Companies Inc 59.67 IUOE Local #49 09/13/2018 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 Local 49 dues 448.03 IUOE Local #49 09/13/2018 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 Local 49 dues 187.27 IUOE Local #49 09/13/2018 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 Local 49 dues 99.70 IUOE Local #49 09/13/2018 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 Local 49 dues 35.00 IUOE Local #49 770.00 JH LARSON COMPANY 09/06/2018 101-1190-4510 Lamps 131.40 JH LARSON COMPANY 131.40 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 4 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 09/06/2018 101-1110-4360 Membership Dues 2018-2019 19,541.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 09/06/2018 101-1110-4360 Minnesota Mayors Assoc Annual Dues 2018 30.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 19,571.00 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 09/06/2018 700-7019-4120 V-Belt, Cogged V-Belt 88.38 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 88.38 Mechtel Clayten 09/13/2018 101-1537-4300 Barnyard Boogie DJ 150.00 Mechtel Clayten 150.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 09/13/2018 701-0000-4509 Waste Water Services - October 2018 152,094.89 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 152,094.89 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 09/13/2018 601-6033-4300 Material Testing & Inspection/Bituminous Plant Inspection 451.85 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 09/13/2018 601-6033-4300 Payroll/Equipment Usage - Powers Blvd@W78th St-Signal 154.40 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 606.25 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 09/13/2018 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 60.01 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 09/13/2018 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.59 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 09/13/2018 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.60 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 09/13/2018 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 16.80 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 96.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.09/13/2018 101-1220-4370 Conference - Don Johnson 300.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. 300.00 NATIONAL REC & PARK ASSOC.09/06/2018 101-1520-4360 Premier Membership Package 650.00 NATIONAL REC & PARK ASSOC. 650.00 Neve Rolland 09/13/2018 101-1180-4020 Return handling charge 4.00 Neve Rolland 4.00 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 09/13/2018 101-1350-4565 Signs 1,777.48 NEWMAN SIGNS INC 1,777.48 Northern Heating & A/C Inc 09/13/2018 101-0000-2033 Overpayment - permit# 2018-02468 11.38 Northern Heating & A/C Inc 11.38 Paragon Party Ponies LLC 09/13/2018 101-1537-4300 Deluxe petting zoo - Barnyard Boogie 275.00 Paragon Party Ponies LLC 275.00 PEOPLES ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS 09/06/2018 101-1190-4300 Proj 307153 Library 623.28 PEOPLES ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS 623.28 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 5 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount PHI Decks 09/13/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 550 Summerfield Drive 1,000.00 PHI Decks 1,000.00 Pitney Bowes Inc.09/13/2018 101-1120-4410 meter rental - 7/1/18-9/30/18 105.00 Pitney Bowes Inc. 105.00 PULLTABS PLUS INC 09/13/2018 101-1560-4130 Bingo supplies 109.52 PULLTABS PLUS INC 09/13/2018 101-1560-4130 Bingo supplies 144.96 PULLTABS PLUS INC 254.48 Pulte Group Pulte Homes of MN LLC 09/06/2018 815-8226-2024 As-Built Escrow - 700,702,704,706,708 Rockburn Road 2,500.00 Pulte Group Pulte Homes of MN LLC 2,500.00 Rust Candace 09/06/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 1331 Ashton Court 250.00 Rust Candace 250.00 Sam's Lawn & Landscape 09/13/2018 700-7050-4300 Root cutting, Irrigation work 322.45 Sam's Lawn & Landscape 09/13/2018 601-6032-4300 Root cutting, Irrigation work 2,595.00 Sam's Lawn & Landscape 2,917.45 Sarles Jodi 09/13/2018 101-0000-1027 Petty Cash - Barnyard Boogie change 300.00 Sarles Jodi 300.00 Senja Inc 09/06/2018 101-1539-4300 Tai Chi instruction 51.20 Senja Inc 51.20 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 09/06/2018 700-7050-4705 Paint, Recycling Fee 194.28 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 09/13/2018 701-0000-4150 Paint 423.36 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 617.64 SIGNSOURCE 09/06/2018 101-1220-4120 PAR tags 90.00 SIGNSOURCE 09/06/2018 101-1170-4110 Interior Name Plates 76.50 SIGNSOURCE 09/13/2018 101-1220-4120 White Chief Helmet 204.50 SIGNSOURCE 371.00 SIR LINES-A-LOT 09/13/2018 101-1550-4300 8/21/18 re-striped parking lot 390.00 SIR LINES-A-LOT 390.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 101-1180-4340 printing/advertising 83.20 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 101-1410-4340 printing/advertising 310.40 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 101-1613-4340 printing/advertising 39.40 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 601-0000-4340 printing/advertising 389.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 720-0000-4340 printing/advertising 363.20 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 101-1110-4340 printing/advertising 96.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 101-1310-4340 printing/advertising 51.20 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 101-1410-4340 printing/advertising 57.60 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 6 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 101-1530-4375 printing/advertising 526.40 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 420-0000-4340 printing/advertising 60.80 Southwest Suburban Publishing 09/13/2018 601-0000-4340 printing/advertising 389.40 Southwest Suburban Publishing 2,366.60 SRCM, LLC 09/13/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 2071 W 65th St 1,500.00 SRCM, LLC 1,500.00 Stephen Longman Builders Inc 09/13/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow - 9901 Deerbrook Drive 500.00 Stephen Longman Builders Inc 500.00 Storms Welding & Mfg, Inc.09/06/2018 101-1320-4520 replace floor-abrasion resistant,street elbow, steel pipe nipple 2,823.90 Storms Welding & Mfg, Inc. 2,823.90 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 09/06/2018 101-1350-4565 Replace light fixtures on back of public works building 250.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 09/06/2018 101-1350-4565 Repair street lighting 1,780.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 2,030.00 TFORCE FINAL MILE 09/06/2018 700-0000-4330 Public Works to MN Dept of Health 46.41 TFORCE FINAL MILE 46.41 The Mustard Seed, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Soil 124.80 The Mustard Seed, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Roses 183.95 The Mustard Seed, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Edging 62.38 The Mustard Seed, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Sod 95.88 The Mustard Seed, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Edging 41.58 The Mustard Seed, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Annual flowers 51.07 The Mustard Seed, Inc. 559.66 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC.09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 Paver Seal and credit from Borgert Pallets 61.97 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC.09/13/2018 101-1550-4120 Holland Autumn Blend, Borgert Pallet 548.68 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC. 610.65 TMS JOHNSON, INC 09/06/2018 700-7050-4705 Insect Screens 800.00 TMS JOHNSON, INC 800.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 09/06/2018 101-1260-4300 Rabies testing 30.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 30.00 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 09/06/2018 101-1190-4510 Ballast 199.10 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 199.10 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 101-1220-4350 garbage service - Sept 2018 67.89 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 101-1170-4350 garbage service - Sept 2018 173.94 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 101-1190-4350 garbage service - Sept 2018 212.18 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 101-1220-4350 garbage service - Sept 2018 26.25 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 7 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 101-1550-4350 garbage service - Sept 2018 372.75 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 101-1370-4350 garbage service - Sept 2018 165.90 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 700-0000-4350 garbage service - Sept 2018 20.74 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 09/06/2018 701-0000-4350 garbage service - Sept 2018 20.74 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 1,060.39 WATEROUS COMPANY 09/06/2018 101-1220-4120 OUTBOARD END MECH SEAL REPL KIT CM/CS 433.00 WATEROUS COMPANY 09/06/2018 101-1220-4120 GASKET & SHIM KIT, BEARING BALL ROWS -355.95 WATEROUS COMPANY 77.05 465,993.08 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 8 of 8 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM Name Check D Account Description Amount 1Password 08/15/2018 101-1160-4220 1Password Annual renewal 35.88 1Password 35.88 511TACTICAL.COM 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 Responder BLS 2000 Bag 214.74 511TACTICAL.COM 214.74 ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 09/06/2018 101-1538-4300 Tae Kwon Do 1,317.00 ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 09/06/2018 101-1539-4300 Tae Kwon Do 411.00 ACTA MINNESOTA-JEFF ENGEL 1,728.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 09/13/2018 101-1170-4300 Monthly service 125.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 125.00 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 09/13/2018 701-0000-4300 Proj P05126-2017-005 Foxwood LS SCADA Programming 5,886.50 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 5,886.50 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 09/06/2018 101-1220-4530 Fill regulatior is broken on fill station - Sherwood Valves 108.12 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 09/13/2018 101-1220-4260 Single Gas CO for Med bags 426.00 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC 534.12 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1220-4375 4th of July parade - candy 199.90 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1220-4375 4th of July parade - candy 349.90 Amazon 08/15/2018 720-7201-4130 Mansfield Maple drops hard candy 59.99 Amazon 08/15/2018 700-7043-4150 Kimwipes Task Wipers 64.11 Amazon 08/15/2018 700-7043-4530 Streamlight Stinger DS LED HL w/230V AC/12V DC 165.73 Amazon 08/15/2018 700-7043-4530 Flashlights Rechargeables, Power cord 29.15 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1160-4530 Iphone case, cables 47.94 Amazon 08/15/2018 700-7050-4705 WWTP - Logitech keyboard and mouse 119.98 Amazon 08/15/2018 400-4126-4703 Logitech keyboard and mouse 59.98 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1170-4110 16GB and 4GB Flash drives 62.73 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1560-4130 Bingo cage, Coffee Urn 140.98 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1160-4530 Otterbox case 26.95 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1160-4210 CompTIA CySA Study Guide 38.70 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1160-4210 CompTIA CySA Practice Tests 23.93 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1170-4110 Dry Erase Board Cleaner 4.50 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1170-4110 Hand Sanitizer, Iphone Screen Protector 29.05 Amazon 08/15/2018 700-0000-4150 Silicone Lubricant 27.89 Amazon 08/15/2018 701-0000-4150 Nitrile Gloves 150.82 Amazon 08/15/2018 700-0000-4530 Dehumidifier w/drain pump 275.36 Amazon 08/15/2018 700-0000-4310 Otterbox Holster Belt Clip 12.49 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 1 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Amazon 08/15/2018 701-0000-4310 Otterbox Holster Belt Clip 12.49 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1530-4120 Balance Beam 85.89 Amazon 08/15/2018 101-1806-4130 Tumbling Wedge 139.95 Amazon 2,128.41 American Legion 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 Chiefs meeting 51.81 American Legion 51.81 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 09/06/2018 101-1220-4120 Pager Battery 74.90 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 74.90 Aramark Arboretum 08/15/2018 720-7201-4300 Arboretum Event 681.71 Aramark Arboretum 681.71 Axels 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 Black Hat Alternation Meal 68.40 Axels 68.40 Boyer Truck Parts 09/06/2018 101-1320-4140 MGM/3230008X LONG STROK 137.96 Boyer Truck Parts 137.96 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 09/13/2018 601-6032-4300 Proj 16-01 Minnewashta Manor Neighborhood St Recon 2,392.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 09/13/2018 601-6041-4300 Proj 19-01 Chanhassen City 9,181.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 09/13/2018 601-6041-4300 Proj 19-01 Chanhassen City 6,140.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 17,713.50 Buffalo Wild Wings 08/15/2018 101-1110-4370 City Council Food 103.74 Buffalo Wild Wings 103.74 Cabela's 08/15/2018 720-0000-4120 Women's waders 107.36 Cabela's 107.36 Cabin Fever Sporting Goods 08/15/2018 101-1618-4130 4th of July fishing prizes 677.67 Cabin Fever Sporting Goods 677.67 CDW Government 08/15/2018 700-7050-4705 Dell OptiPlex 3050 677.65 CDW Government 677.65 Chanhassen Dinner Theatre 08/15/2018 101-1550-4370 Meeting w/Matt Wiggen, Adam Beers, Todd Hoffman - Brick Pavers 30.70 Chanhassen Dinner Theatre 30.70 Chanhassen Floral 08/15/2018 101-1110-4370 Flowers - Charlie Siegle's moms funeral 65.00 Chanhassen Floral 65.00 ComplianceSigns.com 08/15/2018 700-7050-4705 Plastic and Aluminum Signs 72.50 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 2 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount ComplianceSigns.com 72.50 Costco Wholesale 08/15/2018 101-1170-4110 Softsoap, Febreze 26.85 Costco Wholesale 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 4th of July lunch - Watermelon, Buns, Salad 227.85 Costco Wholesale 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 Black Hat - Milk, Ribs, Cheese, Hash Browns, Sour Cream, Foil 438.58 Costco Wholesale 693.28 Coyote Moon Grille 08/15/2018 101-1560-4300 Tour Bus Inclusive Lunch 420.00 Coyote Moon Grille 420.00 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1600-4130 Donuts - 4th of July 15.98 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1560-4130 Retirement Party - Ice 7.47 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1600-4130 Donuts - 4th of July 15.98 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1560-4130 Retirement Party - Cups, Napkins 24.16 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1600-4130 Cups 18.62 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1560-4300 Tumblers, Napkins 10.74 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1560-4300 Chicken, Potato Salad, Coleslaw 148.44 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1320-4150 4th of July parade/BBQ - Water, Pop, Powerade 45.48 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 700-7019-4150 Paper Towels 38.63 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 Black Hat - Onions, Dry Rub, Soup, Marinade 54.66 Cub Foods 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 4th of July 22.89 Cub Foods 403.05 Danial Reem 09/06/2018 101-1539-4300 Zumba class 50.40 Danial Reem 50.40 Danner 08/15/2018 101-1550-4240 Quarry USA 8" Brown AT Wedge boots 280.00 Danner 08/15/2018 101-1550-4240 Quarry USA 8" Brown AT Wedge boots -280.00 Danner 0.00 Dick's Sporting Goods 08/15/2018 720-0000-4120 Waders 128.24 Dick's Sporting Goods 128.24 DiscountMugs 08/15/2018 101-1220-4375 500 White bottles w/logo 559.00 DiscountMugs 559.00 Dungarees 08/15/2018 700-0000-4240 4 Carhartt T-shirts 33.98 Dungarees 08/15/2018 701-0000-4240 4 Carhartt T-shirts 33.98 Dungarees 67.96 ECO Products 08/15/2018 720-7201-4130 Utensils - Forks, Spoons, Knives, Tissues 752.71 ECO Products 08/15/2018 720-7201-4130 Food Trays, Plates, Spoons, Knives, Tissue 928.01 ECO Products 08/15/2018 720-7201-4130 Forks 91.03 ECO Products 1,771.75 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 09/06/2018 701-0000-4150 Penta-Socket 72.50 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 3 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC 72.50 EUREKA SERVICES LLC 09/13/2018 601-6036-4300 Proj 17-01 Landscaping improvements Lake Susan Hills 1,199.00 EUREKA SERVICES LLC 1,199.00 Experts Exchange 08/15/2018 101-1160-4300 Experts Exchange Annual Renewal 199.95 Experts Exchange 199.95 FASTENAL COMPANY 09/06/2018 700-0000-4552 misc parts/supplies 31.25 FASTENAL COMPANY 31.25 FedEx Office 08/15/2018 101-1540-4340 Rental Agreement - BW 1S 2Part Paper 268.44 FedEx Office 268.44 Fire Smart Promotions 08/15/2018 101-1220-4375 Stickers, Tattoos, Bubbles, Coloring books 2,069.00 Fire Smart Promotions 2,069.00 First Out Rescue Equipment 08/15/2018 101-1220-4130 Regulator, Coupler 333.00 First Out Rescue Equipment 333.00 Fun Express LLC 08/15/2018 101-1618-4130 4th of July prizes 953.28 Fun Express LLC 953.28 Galls LLC 08/15/2018 700-0000-4240 Comp Toe Duty Boots 30.80 Galls LLC 08/15/2018 701-0000-4240 Comp Toe Duty Boots 30.80 Galls LLC 61.60 Gear Wash, LLC 09/13/2018 101-1220-4290 Turnout Gear Wash 83.42 Gear Wash, LLC 83.42 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 09/06/2018 400-0000-4300 FTP Tickets - August 2018 807.30 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 807.30 GS DIRECT INC 09/06/2018 101-1170-4110 Canon Ink 1,243.91 GS DIRECT INC 1,243.91 Guitar Center 08/15/2018 400-4126-4703 Audio Recorder, SDHC Card 239.76 Guitar Center 239.76 Hach Company 08/15/2018 700-7043-4120 Chemkey, 25 piece, Orthophosphate, Low Range 241.57 Hach Company 241.57 Hallock Company 08/15/2018 701-0000-4530 115 Vac, 60Hz, Flush, Round 103.46 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 4 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Hallock Company 103.46 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 09/13/2018 400-0000-1155 Fawn Hills Addition No 17-07 svc through 7/1/18 1,980.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 09/13/2018 400-0000-1155 Fawn Hills Addition No 17-07 svc through 6/3/18 2,450.25 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 09/13/2018 400-0000-1155 Fawn Hills Addition No 17-07 Construction through 7/29/18 198.00 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 4,628.25 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 09/06/2018 700-7043-4160 Chlorine Cylinder 130.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 09/06/2018 700-7043-4160 Chlorine Cylinder 80.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 09/13/2018 700-7019-4160 Hydrofluosilicic Acid, Corrosion Inhibitor 14,527.17 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 14,737.17 Health Strategies 09/13/2018 700-0000-4300 Respirator Qualifi 114.00 Health Strategies 114.00 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-0000-4550 Galvanized nipples 43.72 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7043-4150 Connectors, Covers 29.76 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7043-4150 Multi-Purpose sponges 7.47 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7043-4150 Wall mounted hose rack 58.95 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7050-4703 Shelf Welded Unit, Loctite Power Grab 452.33 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-0000-4150 Glass Cleaner, Ammonia, Scrubber, Squeegee, Bucket, pole 52.42 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7043-4120 misc parts/supplies 151.27 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7043-4150 misc parts/supplies 524.18 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-0000-4550 Tape, Adapter, Ball Valve, Sealant, Elbow 106.91 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7050-4705 Conduit Bender, Cover, Straps, Connectors 76.71 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7050-4703 Fridge 698.00 Home Depot 08/15/2018 700-7050-4706 Cable Clamps, Cable ties, Mounting ties, Extension cord, Soap 247.55 Home Depot 08/15/2018 701-0000-4150 Galvanized nipples, Screws, Gal Tee 6.75 Home Depot 2,456.02 ICMA 08/15/2018 101-1120-4370 2018 ICMA 104th Annual Conference 685.00 ICMA 685.00 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 09/13/2018 101-1550-4400 Portable Rest Rooms - July 2018 4,774.05 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 4,774.05 Indelco Plastics Corporation 09/06/2018 700-7050-4705 Coupling, Hoses, Bushing, Nipples, Fitting 77.29 Indelco Plastics Corporation 09/06/2018 700-7050-4705 Coupler, Connectors, Tees, Bushing, Elbows, Pipes 388.28 Indelco Plastics Corporation 465.57 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 09/13/2018 101-1170-4110 Calculator ribbon, Creamer, Organizer 56.96 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 09/13/2018 101-1170-4110 Pouch, Envelope 100.86 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 09/13/2018 101-1170-4110 Paper, Planner, Post-Its, Pens, Rolls 337.78 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 495.60 Jasper Engineering & Equipment Co 09/06/2018 700-7019-4530 MAG 5000 CONVERTER 1,430.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 5 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Jasper Engineering & Equipment Co 1,430.00 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 09/06/2018 101-1220-4290 Road Flares 98.45 JEFFERSON FIRE SAFETY INC 98.45 Kieran's Pub 08/15/2018 101-1560-4300 48 - Farmers Fair + gratuity 1,151.26 Kieran's Pub 1,151.26 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 400-0000-1155 Private Dev Field Observ - svc through 6/30/18 7,370.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 410-0000-4300 Private Dev Field Observ - svc through 6/30/18 7,160.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 14,530.00 Kwik Trip 08/15/2018 701-0000-4170 Gas 22.56 Kwik Trip 22.56 Legacy Services Corporation 09/13/2018 400-0000-4510 final payment-install rebuild materials at Public Works building 4,522.30 Legacy Services Corporation 4,522.30 Litin's Party Value 08/15/2018 101-1560-4130 Retirement Party - Bag, Napkins, Cups 20.03 Litin's Party Value 20.03 Lowes 08/15/2018 700-7050-4706 10 drawer cabinet 428.43 Lowes 428.43 Lunds & Byerly's 08/15/2018 101-1110-4370 BRN BT HOLIDAY PLT - City Council food 7.51 Lunds & Byerly's 08/15/2018 101-1600-4130 Sheet cakes - Sue's retirement 203.97 Lunds & Byerly's 08/15/2018 101-1120-4370 Breakfast for interviews Eng Tech II 19.41 Lunds & Byerly's 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 Special Duty Crew - Water, Tea, Wontons, Salad bar, Rice 51.59 Lunds & Byerly's 282.48 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 09/06/2018 701-0000-4120 Switch Toggles 30.67 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 30.67 Malwarebytes 08/15/2018 101-1160-4220 Anti-Malware and Anti-Exploit Premium - Subscription 53.58 Malwarebytes 53.58 Marco Inc 09/13/2018 101-1170-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - Sept 2018 675.65 Marco Inc 09/13/2018 700-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - Sept 2018 100.00 Marco Inc 09/13/2018 701-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - Sept 2018 100.00 Marco Inc 09/13/2018 720-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges - Sept 2018 50.00 Marco Inc 925.65 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1370-4150 Miller Nozzle, Diffuser 59.10 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 6 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 59.10 Maynard's 08/15/2018 101-1600-4370 Training meeting - Special events 63.54 Maynard's 63.54 McMaster-Carr 08/15/2018 700-7019-4530 Timer-Activated Compressed Air Drain Valve 191.70 McMaster-Carr 08/15/2018 700-0000-4550 Thick-Wall PVC Pipe fitting for water, Bushing Reducing Adapter 21.53 McMaster-Carr 213.23 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 101-1220-4120 misc parts/supplies 69.25 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 101-1350-4565 misc parts/supplies 40.48 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 101-1550-4120 misc parts/supplies 675.23 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 misc parts/supplies 152.57 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 101-1550-4300 misc parts/supplies 50.84 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 700-0000-4150 misc parts/supplies 225.34 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 700-0000-4530 misc parts/supplies 3.59 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 700-0000-4550 misc parts/supplies 27.43 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 700-7019-4150 misc parts/supplies 5.37 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 700-7043-4120 misc parts/supplies 92.90 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 700-7043-4150 misc parts/supplies 191.31 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 09/13/2018 701-0000-4150 misc parts/supplies 5.39 Merlins Ace Hardware 08/15/2018 101-1160-4150 Anchored screws 7.83 Merlins Ace Hardware 08/15/2018 720-0000-4120 Tape Measure 10.73 Merlins Ace Hardware 1,558.26 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 09/13/2018 101-1250-3816 SAC - August -124.25 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 09/13/2018 701-0000-2023 SAC - August 12,425.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 12,300.75 Mills Fleet Farm 08/15/2018 700-0000-4240 Jeans, Shirts, Boots 72.48 Mills Fleet Farm 08/15/2018 701-0000-4240 Jeans, Shirts, Boots 72.47 Mills Fleet Farm 08/15/2018 700-0000-4240 Jeans, Shirts 44.49 Mills Fleet Farm 08/15/2018 701-0000-4240 Jeans, Shirts 44.48 Mills Fleet Farm 233.92 Minnesota Rural Water Association 08/15/2018 701-0000-4370 Training 125.00 Minnesota Rural Water Association 125.00 Minnesota Trophies & Gifts 08/15/2018 101-1618-4300 4th of July trophies 161.50 Minnesota Trophies & Gifts 161.50 MN American Water Works Association 08/15/2018 700-0000-4370 255.00 MN American Water Works Association 255.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 09/13/2018 101-0000-2022 Surcharge - August 2018 2,383.63 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 09/13/2018 101-1250-3818 Surcharge - August 2018 -47.68 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 7 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 2,335.95 MN Government Finance Officers Association 08/15/2018 101-1130-4360 Membership - Beth Wieland 50.00 MN Government Finance Officers Association 50.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.09/06/2018 101-1767-4300 USSSA Fall Softball Team Sanction - 8 teams 176.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 176.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 4,928.41 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 34.70 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 165.13 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 520.24 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 34.23 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 165.49 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 32.75 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 09/06/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 76.38 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 5,957.33 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/06/2018 101-1550-4120 Hose Clamps 30.70 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/06/2018 101-1320-4120 Oil Filters 11.44 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 09/13/2018 101-1320-4140 Air Conditioning Orifice Tube 1.54 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 43.68 Noodles & Company 08/15/2018 101-1110-4370 City Council Dinner 118.11 Noodles & Company 118.11 Oak 19 08/15/2018 101-1120-4370 Carver County City Managers meeting 19.00 Oak 19 19.00 Office Max/Office Depot 08/15/2018 700-7043-4150 Paper 35.26 Office Max/Office Depot 08/15/2018 101-1540-4130 Register 127.81 Office Max/Office Depot 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 Pens, Folders for rookies 10.68 Office Max/Office Depot 08/15/2018 700-7050-4705 WWTP - Display port to hdmi 37.98 Office Max/Office Depot 08/15/2018 700-7050-4703 Clips, Pens, Organizer, Stapler 173.52 Office Max/Office Depot 08/15/2018 700-7050-4703 Desk pad, Clock, 3 Chairs 644.39 Office Max/Office Depot 08/15/2018 101-1616-4130 Playground craft - gel stamp pads 13.23 Office Max/Office Depot 1,042.87 Olson Annika 09/13/2018 101-1538-4300 Babysitting Training - 7/16/18 943.00 Olson Annika 09/13/2018 101-1538-4300 Safe Kids Training - 7/16/18 1,000.00 Olson Annika 1,943.00 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 09/13/2018 101-1220-4140 misc parts/supplies 39.16 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 09/13/2018 101-1370-4170 misc parts/supplies 156.96 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 09/13/2018 700-0000-4140 misc parts/supplies -22.00 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 09/13/2018 101-1550-4140 misc parts/supplies 7.53 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 8 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount O'Reilly Automotive Inc 181.65 Party City 08/15/2018 101-1600-4130 Red Ticket Roll Double 12.89 Party City 08/15/2018 101-1618-4130 4th of July supplies 76.92 Party City 08/15/2018 101-1560-4130 Streamers, Banners 24.64 Party City 08/15/2018 101-1560-4130 Balloons 20.28 Party City 134.73 Pedretti Christine Lea 09/06/2018 101-1539-4300 8/28/18 Gentle Yoga and Vinyasa yoga 266.50 Pedretti Christine Lea 266.50 Pioneer Engineering, P.A.09/13/2018 420-0000-4300 Proj 118132 Lake Susan Trail Rehab through 7/31/18 4,800.00 Pioneer Engineering, P.A. 4,800.00 Pizzaioli 08/15/2018 101-1613-4130 4th of July lunch 134.81 Pizzaioli 134.81 Primary Fluid Systems Inc 08/15/2018 700-7043-4530 Eco Valve 735.75 Primary Fluid Systems Inc 735.75 PRO TURF 09/13/2018 101-1550-4300 Galpin 1/2 mile south of Hwy 5 327.00 PRO TURF 09/13/2018 101-1550-4300 7901 Park Road 1,132.00 PRO TURF 1,459.00 REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 09/06/2018 700-0000-4301 Completion of 2017 audit 7,200.00 REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 09/06/2018 701-0000-4301 Completion of 2017 audit 7,000.00 REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 09/06/2018 720-0000-4301 Completion of 2017 audit 4,600.00 REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 09/06/2018 101-1130-4301 Completion of 2017 audit 12,400.00 REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 31,200.00 Redstone American Grill 08/15/2018 101-1120-4370 Lunch meeting with EP City Manager 66.00 Redstone American Grill 66.00 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 09/06/2018 700-7050-4751 Chanhassen West WTP 108,293.35 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 108,293.35 Richfield Bus Company 08/15/2018 101-1560-4300 Motorcoach to Nicollet Island Pavilion 568.50 Richfield Bus Company 568.50 Rotary Club 08/15/2018 101-1520-4360 Monthly Rotary Club Membership Fee - Todd Hoffman 53.00 Rotary Club 08/15/2018 101-1120-4360 Monthly Rotary Club Membership Fee - Todd Gerhardt 53.00 Rotary Club 106.00 Sam's Club 08/15/2018 101-1560-4300 Bread, Cookies, Watermelon 61.86 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 9 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Sam's Club 61.86 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 08/15/2018 101-1430-4375 July 3rd Booth Expo 175.00 Southwest Metro Chamber of Commerce 175.00 Southwest Rental and Sales 08/15/2018 700-0000-4120 Mower parts 48.99 Southwest Rental and Sales 48.99 Sprinkler Warehouse 08/15/2018 101-1550-4151 Rain Bird Seal-A-Matic Stainless Steel Rotor 5", Nozzles 738.06 Sprinkler Warehouse 738.06 SPS COMPANIES INC 09/06/2018 101-1370-4510 Urinal/Toilet repair 129.70 SPS COMPANIES INC 129.70 Target 08/15/2018 101-1616-4130 Goldfish crackers - playground 13.98 Target 08/15/2018 101-1618-4130 4th of July prizes 335.60 Target 08/15/2018 101-1616-4130 Playground - Tollhouse 5.99 Target 08/15/2018 700-7043-4150 Batteries 15.99 Target 08/15/2018 101-1220-4290 Apple Cable 20.40 Target 08/15/2018 101-1600-4130 Tea 9.31 Target 08/15/2018 101-1616-4130 Playground snack and craft 38.15 Target 08/15/2018 101-1618-4130 4th of July water 29.45 Target 08/15/2018 101-1616-4130 hand sanitizer 7.74 Target 08/15/2018 101-1616-4130 Playground craft - paper towels, glue 44.74 Target 08/15/2018 101-1807-4130 Ice, Popsicles 5.04 Target 08/15/2018 101-1807-4130 Tie Dye Camp - Shirts 43.29 Target 08/15/2018 700-0000-4240 Jeans 33.98 Target 08/15/2018 701-0000-4240 Jeans 33.98 Target 637.64 TESSMAN SEED CO 09/13/2018 101-1550-4120 Additional freight due - not charged on inv# S278411 29.00 TESSMAN SEED CO 29.00 The Mustard Seed 08/15/2018 101-1550-4120 16 - sod retail #1464 $7.99/each 137.27 The Mustard Seed 137.27 Ultimate Carts LLC 08/15/2018 101-1618-4130 4th of July 352.69 Ultimate Carts LLC 352.69 Under Armour 08/15/2018 101-1220-4240 Polos 989.78 Under Armour 08/15/2018 101-1220-4240 Polos 539.67 Under Armour 1,529.45 UNITED WAY 09/13/2018 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00414.09.2018 United Way 28.40 UNITED WAY 28.40 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 10 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount US Water Alliance 08/15/2018 101-1120-4370 One Water Summit 2018 775.00 US Water Alliance 775.00 USA BLUE BOOK 09/06/2018 701-0000-4551 Float Switch 65' 426.42 USA BLUE BOOK 426.42 USABlueBook 08/15/2018 700-7050-4705 Diecut Lettering 67.42 USABlueBook 08/15/2018 700-7050-4705 Hazardous Material Signals 90.38 USABlueBook 157.80 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1220-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1550-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 426.81 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1520-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 51.42 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1600-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 173.22 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1530-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 51.42 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-0000-2006 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 10.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 613.29 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 479.68 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 720-0000-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 118.17 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1160-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 450.32 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1120-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 374.32 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1170-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 31.74 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1260-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 103.49 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1130-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 515.15 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1250-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 144.58 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1310-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 270.17 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1370-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 119.90 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1320-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 425.53 VERIZON WIRELESS 09/06/2018 101-1220-4310 phone charges 7/19/18-8/18/18 487.95 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,887.17 Viking Electric Supply 08/15/2018 701-0000-4150 Cord Conn 3/4" 24.88 Viking Electric Supply 08/15/2018 701-0000-4150 charged wrong account-credit on next statement 67.01 Viking Electric Supply 91.89 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 09/06/2018 701-0000-4150 Hand Cleaner 118.10 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 118.10 Wal-Mart 08/15/2018 101-1600-4130 Tea - Sue's party 23.91 Wal-Mart 08/15/2018 101-1618-4130 4th of July supplies 266.82 Wal-Mart 08/15/2018 101-1616-4130 playground 31.45 Wal-Mart 08/15/2018 101-1616-4130 Playground crafts 35.88 Wal-Mart 358.06 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc.09/06/2018 101-1320-4410 Barricades, Cones, Arrows, Turn Symbols, Signs 236.10 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc.09/13/2018 101-1550-4300 Rental-TH Trucks Hauling - Manchester Dr & Lake Lucy Rd 210.00 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 446.10 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 11 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount Whel-Tech 08/15/2018 700-0000-4530 Flood Level-Float Switch 312.95 Whel-Tech 312.95 Wholesale-Direct-First-Aid.com 08/15/2018 101-1220-4375 CPR Manikin 10 pack 890.49 Wholesale-Direct-First-Aid.com 890.49 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/06/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 432.13 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/06/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 608.60 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/06/2018 700-0000-4552 Shop - 1" MINUS 715.49 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/06/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 557.60 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/06/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 596.70 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/13/2018 101-1550-4150 903 Lake Dr 246.49 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/13/2018 700-0000-4552 Conbit 8/28/18 558.07 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 09/13/2018 420-0000-4751 Asphalt Plant 345.10 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 4,060.18 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 601-6032-4752 Street Reconstruction Proj 16-01 - July 2018 4,740.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 101-1310-4300 2018 GIS Support Services - svc 6/1/18-6/30/18 156.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 601-6038-4752 Orchard Lane Area Street/Utility Recon Proj 18-01 - June 2018 387.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 601-6040-4752 Galpin Blvd Watermain Improvements - June 2018 3,193.25 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 720-0000-4300 Avienda Development Stormwater Review - June 2018 657.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 700-0000-4300 Water Distribution System Evaluation - June 2018 875.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 101-1310-4300 OMS Pavement Distress History Import - svc 6/1/18-6/30/18 962.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 601-6038-4752 Orchard Lane Area Street/Utility Recon Proj 18-01 - July 2018 6,271.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 700-7050-4752 West Water Treatment Plant CMT's - svc July 2018 527.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 601-6039-4752 Lake Drive East Street Improvement Proj 18-02 - svc July 2018 1,725.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 700-0000-4300 Water Distribution System Evaluation - svc July 2018 353.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 720-0000-4300 Avienda Development Stormwater Review - svc July 2018 86.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 601-6032-4752 Street Reconstruction Proj 16-01 - June 2018 4,591.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 601-6033-4752 Park Road Mill and Overlay - May 2018 30,547.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 09/13/2018 601-6033-4752 Park Road Mill and Overlay - June 2018 4,047.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 59,120.75 WW Grainger 08/15/2018 700-7050-4706 Printer, Vacuum, Step ladder, filter, Cabinet 820.25 WW Grainger 08/15/2018 700-7043-4120 RCD Tag, Absorbent Pad 93.80 WW Grainger 08/15/2018 701-0000-4530 Fuses 217.59 WW Grainger 08/15/2018 701-0000-4530 Hour Meter AC Quartz 58.17 WW Grainger 08/15/2018 701-0000-4150 PK5 Fuse 1/2A MDL 250VAC 25.40 WW Grainger 1,215.21 WW GRAINGER INC 09/06/2018 101-1550-4260 Hand Dryer,Swivel,Cast Iron, Push Button 287.70 WW GRAINGER INC 09/13/2018 101-1551-4260 Lake Susan Women's Restroom - Hand Dryer 287.70 WW GRAINGER INC 575.40 XCEL ENERGY INC 09/06/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 16,632.54 XCEL ENERGY INC 16,632.54 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 09/13/2018 700-0000-4120 medical supplies 24.64 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 09/13/2018 101-1550-4120 medical supplies 24.64 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 12 of 13 Name Check D Account Description Amount ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 09/13/2018 101-1370-4120 medical supplies 24.64 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 09/13/2018 101-1320-4120 medical supplies 24.63 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 98.55 363,604.94 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (09/14/2018 - 9:14 AM)Page 13 of 13 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, September 24, 2018 Subject Thank you letter from Pine City dated September 13, 2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: L.2. Prepared By File No:  ATTACHMENTS: Thank­you letter from Pine City dated 9­13­2018