Loading...
Agenda and Packet 02-12-2018AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2018 CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD A.5:00 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Note:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. 1.Finalize 2018 Key Financial Strategies 2.Discussion of PRN Residential Development B.CALL TO ORDER C.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS D.CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1.Approve City Council Minutes dated January 8, 2018 2.Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated December 12, 2017 3.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 2, 2018 4.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 16, 2018 5.Variance Request: 7052 Minnewashta Parkway 6.Resolution 2018­09: Approve Purchase of Two Fire Department Command Vehicles 7.Resolution 2018­10: Approve the Purchase of Exhaust Gas Venting System for Fire Stations 8.Resolution 2018­11: Authorize Support of TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan, Carver County Parks 9.Resolution 2018­12: Accept Donation from the Chanhassen Athletic Association for Lake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2018CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:00 P.M. ­ WORK SESSIONNote:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Finalize 2018 Key Financial Strategies2.Discussion of PRN Residential DevelopmentB.CALL TO ORDERC.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated January 8, 20182.Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated December 12, 20173.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 2, 20184.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 16, 20185.Variance Request: 7052 Minnewashta Parkway6.Resolution 2018­09: Approve Purchase of Two Fire Department Command Vehicles7.Resolution 2018­10: Approve the Purchase of Exhaust Gas Venting System for FireStations8.Resolution 2018­11: Authorize Support of TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan, CarverCounty Parks 9.Resolution 2018­12: Accept Donation from the Chanhassen Athletic Association for Lake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting 10.Resolution 2018­13: Approve Application for Funding from the Carver County Community Development Agency Community Growth Partnership Initiative Program for Rosemount, Inc., a subsidiary of Emerson Electric Co. 11.Resolution 2018­14: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Project 12.Resolution 2018­15: 1650 Motorplex Court­Subdivision Request and Conditional Use Permit Amendment 13.Mission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans & Specifications 14.7700 Quattro Drive: Amend Conditional Use Permit for Cell Tower 15.2018 Pay Equity Report 16.Resolution 2018­16: Accept Public Street and Utility Improvements in Glaccum Highlands 17.Resolution 2018­17: 3821 West 62nd Street: Cathcart Park Detachment to City of Shorewood E.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1.Presentation of Donation from Chanhassen Athletic Association for Lake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting F.OLD BUSINESS G.PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.Approve Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Target Corporation, dba Target Store T­0862, 851 West 78th Street 2.Resolution 2018­18: Approve Vacation of Easements at 7721 Erie Avenue (Nustad) H.NEW BUSINESS 1.Award of Bid for Lake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting 2.Variance Request: 3617 Red Cedar Point 3.531 West 79th Street: Approval of Site Plan to construct Panera Bread I.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS J.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS K.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION 1.Letter from Metro Cities dated January 3, 2018 2.Review of Claims Paid 1­22­18 3.Letter from Xcel Energy dated January 29, 2018 4.Review of Claims Paid 2­12­18 5.Letter from Mediacom dated January 29, 2018 L.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS AGENDACHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILMONDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2018CHANHASSEN CITY HALL, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARDA.5:00 P.M. ­ WORK SESSIONNote:  Work sessions are open to the public.If the City Council does not complete the worksession items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regularagenda.1.Finalize 2018 Key Financial Strategies2.Discussion of PRN Residential DevelopmentB.CALL TO ORDERC.PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTSD.CONSENT AGENDAAll items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council andwill be considered as one motion.  There will be no separate discussion of these items.  Ifdiscussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and consideredseparately.  City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item.  Refer to thecouncil packet for each staff report.1.Approve City Council Minutes dated January 8, 20182.Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated December 12, 20173.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 2, 20184.Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 16, 20185.Variance Request: 7052 Minnewashta Parkway6.Resolution 2018­09: Approve Purchase of Two Fire Department Command Vehicles7.Resolution 2018­10: Approve the Purchase of Exhaust Gas Venting System for FireStations8.Resolution 2018­11: Authorize Support of TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan, CarverCounty Parks9.Resolution 2018­12: Accept Donation from the Chanhassen Athletic Association forLake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting10.Resolution 2018­13: Approve Application for Funding from the Carver CountyCommunity Development Agency Community Growth Partnership Initiative Programfor Rosemount, Inc., a subsidiary of Emerson Electric Co.11.Resolution 2018­14: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2017 Inflow andInfiltration (I/I) Project12.Resolution 2018­15: 1650 Motorplex Court­Subdivision Request and Conditional UsePermit Amendment13.Mission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &Specifications14.7700 Quattro Drive: Amend Conditional Use Permit for Cell Tower15.2018 Pay Equity Report16.Resolution 2018­16: Accept Public Street and Utility Improvements in GlaccumHighlands17.Resolution 2018­17: 3821 West 62nd Street: Cathcart Park Detachment to City ofShorewoodE.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS1.Presentation of Donation from Chanhassen Athletic Association for Lake Susan ParkBallfield LightingF.OLD BUSINESSG.PUBLIC HEARINGS1.Approve Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Target Corporation, dba TargetStore T­0862, 851 West 78th Street2.Resolution 2018­18: Approve Vacation of Easements at 7721 Erie Avenue (Nustad)H.NEW BUSINESS1.Award of Bid for Lake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting2.Variance Request: 3617 Red Cedar Point3.531 West 79th Street: Approval of Site Plan to construct Panera BreadI.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONSJ.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONSK.CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION1.Letter from Metro Cities dated January 3, 20182.Review of Claims Paid 1­22­183.Letter from Xcel Energy dated January 29, 20184.Review of Claims Paid 2­12­185.Letter from Mediacom dated January 29, 2018L.ADJOURNMENT GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting.  In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council.  That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. Anyone indicating a desire to speak during Visitor Presentations will be acknowledged by the Mayor.  When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic.  All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue.  Limit your comments to five minutes.  Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor.  If you have written comments, provide a copy to the Council. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff listen to comments and will not engage in discussion.  Council members or the City Manager may ask questions of you in order to gain a thorough understanding of your concern, suggestion or request. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed.  Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Applebee's, 590 West 79th Street in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event.  All members of the public are welcome. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Finalize 2018 Key Financial Strategies Section 5:00 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.1. Prepared By Todd Gerhardt, City Manager File No: ADM 076 BACKGROUND Attached please find the tabulated rankings awarded by City Council members for each of the potential priorities for 2018. Each item was ranked by Council members on a scale from 1 to 4, with 1 being the highest priority. The average rankings can be found in the last column.  During the work session, the City Council will discuss the rankings and determine the final 2018 Key Financial Strategies. The finalized list will be voted on at the February 26, 2018 meeting, and will become the 2018 work plan for staff. ATTACHMENTS: Ranked List of 2018 Key Financial Strategies 2018 Key Financial Strategies/Goals Page 1 CATEGORY GOAL ACTION Laufenburger Campion McDonald Ryan Tjornhom Average B Implement Park Replacement Schedule Initiate funding of an annual park equipment replacement schedule to efficiently address aged and deteriorated park equipment and infrastructure. 1 2 2 2 1 1.6 A Develop Lake Ann Park and Trail Expansion Master Plan/PRN Property Development Initiate master planning and feasibility study to guide future acquisition of lands expanding Lake Ann Park and associated trails. Review the Park and Trail Plan for the property surrounding Lake Ann, and the planning tools available (density transfer) to acquire open space. 1 1 1 1 4 1.6 B Social Host Ordinance Research social host ordinance implications and effectiveness in other jurisdictions and decide whether or not to pursue ordinance adoption. 2 3 4 3 4 3.2 B Review Sanitary Sewer Inflow/Infiltration (I/I) Reduction Plan Staff will update Council on the current I/I reduction plan and see if the Council wants to make any changes. 1 2 1 3 1 1.6 B Upgrade of Galpin Blvd. Complete the scoping and traffic study with Carver County, and identify funding sources for the upgrade of Galpin Blvd north of Highway 5. 1 1 2 2 1 1.4 C Consideration of establishing a GreenStep Cities program The GreenStep Cities program fits into the Key Financial Strategies of Strengthen the City’s Financial Position and Competiveness. By implementing additional tasks within the GreenStep Cities program, the City will have cost savings, which improves the City’s financial position. The promotion of the City’s attainment of Levels 1 and 2 and the plan to attain Level 3, proves to residents that the City is conscious of environmental issues and supports the City’s objective to be a “community for life”, thereby making the City of Chanhassen a strong competitor when residents are choosing a community in the west suburbs. 3 2 1 2 4 2.4 2018 Key Financial Strategies/Goals Page 2 CATEGORY GOAL ACTION Laufenburger Campion McDonald Ryan Tjornhom Average B Short-term rental licensing Explore ordinance amendments to regulate short-term residential rentals via Airbnb, VRBO, etc. 2 4 4 2 4 3.2 B Highway 5 Underpass at Market Blvd. and Great Plains Blvd. Look for opportunities along the Highway 5 corridor for an underpass 4 2 1 4 1 2.4 B Brew Pub/Distilleries Ordinance Propose ordinance that would cover brew pubs and distilleries in a variety of land use areas. 2 2 1 3 3 2.2 A Economic Development Enhance economic development opportunities throughout the community, i.e. incentives, marketing, direct marketing 2 2 1 1 3 1.8 A Review Law Enforcement Contract Consider alternative to current contract with CCSO 4 2 4 2 4 3.2 B Tobacco 21 Consider pros and cons of raising legal age of tobacco purchase to 21 4 3 4 1 4 3.2 C Commission and Elected Official Term Limits Consider term limits for commissions and elected officials, i.e. survey KFS city policies 3 3 4 1 4 3 B Evaluate Development Review Processes Consider changing the development review process to allow city council to view and comment prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and review statutory requirements to review other options to implement. 3 1 4 1 4 2.6 2018 Key Financial Strategies/Goals Page 3 CATEGORY GOAL ACTION Laufenburger Campion McDonald Ryan Tjornhom Average C Improve video and audio quality of all city broadcasts Review and consider equipment improvements needed to improve video and audio quality 2 4 1 2 2 2.2 A Improvements to Chanhassen Railroad Depot Make improvements to the Railroad Depot in order to better utilize a key piece of Chanhassen’s history. 1 3 2 2 2 2 TIME COMMITMENT LEGEND A: 3+ meetings (more than one year) B: 2 to 3 meetings (3 to 6 months) C: 1 to 2 meetings (1 to 3 months) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Discussion of PRN Residential Development Section 5:00 P.M. ­ WORK SESSION Item No: A.2. Prepared By Kate Aanenson, AICP, Community Development Director File No:  SUMMARY The trustee of the PRN estate is working on a sale of the estate's residential property located off of Galpin Boulevard. Staff would like to share with the Council regulations that affect the development of the property. Attached is a PowerPoint that will be discussed in greater detail during the work session. ATTACHMENTS: Prince Residential Land Presentation to Council PRN Property 4 Parcels 185.35 acres Lake Ann Interceptor Bluff means a natural topographic feature such as a hill, cliff or embankment having the following characteristics: (1)The slope rises at least 25 feet above the toe of the bluff; and (2)The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the toe of the bluff averages 30 percent or greater; and (3) An area with an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff. Potential Bluffs P1 P2 P3 Any lot within the shoreland overlay district is limited to 25% lot coverage and the following minimum lot size: Single family 20,000 if riparian, 15,000 if not; Duplex: 35,000 if riparian, 26,000 if not; Triplex: 50,000 if riparian, 38,000 if not; Quad plex: 65,000 if riparian, 49,000 if not. Summer 2017 Chanhassen Connection Article Future Lake Ann Park Expansion A future initiative identified in the city’s Comprehensive Plan is the expansion of Lake Ann Park. The original 63 acres for the park were purchased by the city in 1969 following a successful referendum. By a vote of 452-350, residents approved the issuance of general obligation bonds to provide funds for acquisition and betterment of parks! Lake Ann Park has grown both in size and popularity in the 48 years since that important vote. Now encompassing 102 acres, the park is cherished for its wide variety of attractions including pristine Lake Ann, a swimming beach, ball fields, and picnicking areas, as well as for its history as a town gathering spot. The goals of the future Lake Ann Park expansion plan is to secure over 100 additional acres of shoreline, wetlands, and woodlands to the west of Lake Ann and Lake Lucy, including the land between the two lakes and around the entire perimeter of Lake Ann. This initiative would preserve a natural resource and pedestrian trail corridor around Lake Ann and around the southern and western shores of Lake Lucy. All of the property identified for the future park expansion is currently privately owned. A variety of land acquisition instruments will need to be utilized to acquire additional parklands and it is likely that multiple agreements will be struck over time to realize the ultimate park expansion plan. Once land-use changes are planned for the area, the city will work with landowners to reach mutually beneficial agreements for the expansion of Lake Ann Park. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Approve City Council Minutes dated January 8, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.1. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: N/A PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves Minutes dated January 8, 2018." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Work Session Summary Verbatim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 8, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the work session to order at 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, Greg Sticha, Kim Meuwissen, and Richard Rice PUBLIC PRESENT: Todd Neils 990 Saddlebrook Curve NOVUSAGENDA TRAINING. Kim Meuwissen provided background information on the need to change to this software as a means to reduce the use of paper prior to introducing Danny Ortiz with NovusAgenda who walked council members through the use of NovusAgenda. Mayor Laufenburger asked for clarification on how this agenda is accessed offline. DISCUSSION OF KEY GOALS AND STRATEGIES FOR 2018. Todd Gerhardt reviewed the results of the 2018 goals and key financial strategies. Councilwoman Ryan asked if the updates on Emerald Ash Borer needs to be a goal since the council receives annual updates. In discussing consideration of establishing GreenStep Cities program, staff stated this was more an informational item than a goal. Councilman Campion clarified that the reason he suggested brew pub ordinance review because they’re popping up all around except in Chanhassen and suggested that this item be lumped in with the economic development item. Mayor Laufenburger suggested leaving the two items separate. Todd Gerhardt explained the different categories for brew pubs, tap rooms, and liquor stores that sell craft brews. Mayor Laufenburger suggested considering term limits for commissioners and council members and adding the word “audio” to the goal of improving the quality of equipment for city broadcasts. Todd Gerhardt explained how council members will review the goals and rankings. Mayor Laufenburger asked for clarification on when staff needs the ranking results. City Council Work Session – January 8, 2018 2 DISCUSS LAKE SUSAN PARK BALLFIELD LIGHTING. Todd Hoffman provided background information that this item is currently in the 2018 CIP and discussed the options for lighting product and associated costs. He noted staff is recommending approval of the MUSCO LED Total Light Control System that can be delivered in 5 to 8 weeks. Mayor Laufenburger asked for clarification on the cost breakdown of what’s included in the bid and how additional usage of the field will impact maintenance. Councilwoman Ryan asked about drawing down the park dedication fund if this item is ordered in 2018 and clarified that no projects will be done in 2019. Todd Hoffman noted that this donation will be the largest public donation ever received by the City of Chanhassen. After discussion it was the consensus of council members to direct staff to bring this item back for approval as under council action, not the consent agenda. Mayor Laufenburger asked Todd Gerhardt to give an update on the meeting held with State legislators and tour of Highway 101 south to Flying Cloud Drive. Mayor Laufenburger adjourned the work session at 6:35 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Vera Morgan 5005 Woodland Road, Minnetonka ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS: • DESIGNATION OF OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER • APPOINTMENT OF ACTING MAYOR • APPOINTMENTS TO THE FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION BOARD OF TRUSTEES • APPOINTMENT TO THE SOUTHWEST TRANSIT COMMISSION Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Ryan seconded to approve the following organizational items: • Designation of Chanhassen Villager as the Official Newspaper • Appointment of Councilman Dan Campion as Acting Mayor • Appointment of Councilwoman Elise Ryan to the Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees • Appointment of Mayor Denny Laufenburger to the Southwest Transit Commission All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: City Council Summary – January 8, 2018 2 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated December 11, 2017 2. Approve City Council Minutes dated December 18, 2017 3. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated December 5, 2017 4. Item deleted. 5. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License. St. Hubert’s Catholic Community, Cana Dinner on February 10. 6. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, Chanhassen Rotary Club, February Festival, February 3, Lake Ann Park. 7. Resolution #2018-01: Approve Agreement with MnDOT for Federal Fund Transfers. 8. Resolution #2018-02: Approve Minnewashta Manor Storm Water Pond Maintenance Quote. 9. Approve Nicholas Way Snowplowing Agreement. 10. The Massage Space – 18924 Lake Drive East: Approve Massage License (New Manager). 11. Approve Support of Funding for Resolution #2018-03: for TH 5 and Resolution #2018- 04: for TH 101 Through Corridors of Commerce Program. 12. Approve West Park 2nd Addition Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans and Specifications. 13. Resolution #2018-05: Authorize a Primary Contact for Contract Coordination with MnDOT for a Community Roadside Landscape Partnership Program for Highway 7, City Project 2016-01. 14. Resolution #2018-06: Accept Public Street & Utility Improvements in Preserve at Rice Lake Project No. 2014-05. 15. Resolution #2018-07: Accept Public Portion of Utility Improvements in Powers Ridge 2nd Addition, Phase III, Powers Ridge Senior Apartments. 16. Resolution #2018-08: Call for Sale 2018A General Obligation Utility Improvement Bonds in the amount of $3.595 Million Dollars. City Council Summary – January 8, 2018 3 17. Item Deleted. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Vera Morgan, 5005 Woodland Road, Minnetonka discussed points that she brought up in an email sent to Kate Aanenson regarding the Paisley Park PUD amendment. ORDINANCE 630: PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM PUD AMENDMENT. Kate Aanenson presented the staff report and Planning Commission update on this item. Council members asked legal counsel to clarify the difference between a PUD amendment and a liquor license. The applicant Karen White discussed the corporate parties that will be held during Super Bowl week, the museum hours of operation, security, capacity for Paisley Park, and liability insurance. Councilwoman Ryan asked for clarification of how Paisley Park will handle traffic circulation with Lyft and Uber and if delinquent property taxes would affect a liquor license for the Paisley Park property. After comments and discussion by council members the following motion was made. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance Amending the Paisley Park Planned Unit Development with the following amendment to Section 1(D)(3): 3. Liquor sales and consumption except from January 29, 2018 through February 5, 2018 from 7:00 P.M. until 1:00 A.M. during which period liquor sales and consumption are permitted at private parties with no more than 1,000 people in attendance at one time. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Todd Gerhardt presented updates that warming houses and skating rinks are open for business, a watermain break at Red Cedar Point Road and Juniper Avenue, franchise fee educational brochure available on the City’s website, included in utility bills and educational open houses scheduled for February 8th and April 10th from 6:00 to 7:30 in the Wilder Room at the Chanhassen Library. He congratulated Project Engineer, Stephanie Smith on the birth of her baby Lucy on December 31, 2017. Councilman Campion moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 8, 2018 Mayor Laufenburger called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Laufenburger, Councilman McDonald, Councilwoman Ryan, and Councilman Campion COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Chelsea Petersen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman and Roger Knutson PUBLIC PRESENT: Vera Morgan 5005 Woodland Road, Minnetonka Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you and welcome to City Council meeting. Those of you that are in the chambers this evening as well as those of you that are watching on Mediacom cable television or also through our website and for those of you that are watching on TV, if you ever travel and you want to make sure you get the City Council online you can do so by simply going to our city website ci.chanhassen.mn.us and then choose agenda and you can see the site. For the record let it be known that all members are present with exception of Councilmember Tjornhom this evening who is out sick so she has an excused absence. Our first item on the agenda is to approve the agenda. Council members, are there any modifications to the agenda as printed this evening? If not we will then proceed with the agenda as printed. ORGANIZATIONAL ITEMS: • DESIGNATION OF OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER • APPOINTMENT OF ACTING MAYOR • APPOINTMENTS TO THE FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION BOARD OF TRUSTEES • APPOINTMENT TO THE SOUTHWEST TRANSIT COMMISSION Mayor Laufenburger: Our first item of business is organizational items. At the first meeting of every year we establish certain organizational guidelines for the year. Let me just speak through these and then as I speak through these I will conclude with asking for a motion to approve. First of all we designate an official newspaper. Mr. Gerhardt I understand the Chanhassen Villager is the only newspaper that has responded to our request, is that correct? Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 2 Todd Gerhardt: That is correct Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: And the Villager has done an exceptional job over the years in being, acting as the official newspaper so I will move forward with a recommendation on that. We also appoint an Acting Mayor. In the event that I as the mayor am not able to attend a meeting or a function we appoint an Acting Mayor or a Deputy Mayor who serves in my stead throughout the year and Mr. Campion I understand you have expressed an agreeable interest in performing those duties, is that correct? Councilman Campion: Yes it is. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Mr. Campion. We also make an appointment to the Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees. This is a group of members of the fire department along with our Finance Director Mr. Sticha and a member of the City Council act as a Board of Trustees for the Fire Relief Association. Councilmember Ryan I understand you have expressed an agreement of interest for that purpose, is that correct? Councilwoman Ryan: Yes Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Thank you very much. Also an appointment to the Southwest Transit Commission. Chanhassen is 1 of 3 cities that operate Southwest Transit under a joint powers agreement and there is currently one term, Mr. McDonald you are serving a term that expires in, is it 1 or 2 years is that correct? Councilman McDonald: I was just talking to Mr. Gerhardt. I believe it expires next December. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so you have this full year but we did have my term expired in December and I would like to continue to operate, or continue to serve on that commission. We are allowed 2 positions. Two elected positions so I would like to continue on that. So with that I would like a motion in support of the official newspaper being the Villager. The Acting Mayor, Councilmember Dan Campion. Appointment to the Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees, Councilmember Ryan and appointment of me to the Southwest Transit Commission. Do I have a motion to that effect? Councilman McDonald: I’ll move Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you very much Mr. McDonald. Is there a second? Councilwoman Ryan: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Councilmember Ryan. Is there any discussion? Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 3 Councilman McDonald moved, Councilwoman Ryan seconded to approve the following organizational items: • Designation of Chanhassen Villager as the Official Newspaper • Appointment of Councilman Dan Campion as Acting Mayor • Appointment of Councilwoman Elise Ryan to the Fire Relief Association Board of Trustees • Appointment of Mayor Denny Laufenburger to the Southwest Transit Commission All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: 1. Approve City Council Minutes dated December 11, 2017 2. Approve City Council Minutes dated December 18, 2017 3. Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated December 5, 2017 4. Item deleted. 5. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License. St. Hubert’s Catholic Community, Cana Dinner on February 10. 6. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, Chanhassen Rotary Club, February Festival, February 3, Lake Ann Park. 7. Resolution #2018-01: Approve Agreement with MnDOT for Federal Fund Transfers. 8. Resolution #2018-02: Approve Minnewashta Manor Storm Water Pond Maintenance Quote. 9. Approve Nicholas Way Snowplowing Agreement. 10. The Massage Space – 18924 Lake Drive East: Approve Massage License (New Manager). 11. Approve Support of Funding for Resolution #2018-03: for TH 5 and Resolution #2018- 04: for TH 101 Through Corridors of Commerce Program. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 4 12. Approve West Park 2nd Addition Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans and Specifications. 13. Resolution #2018-05: Authorize a Primary Contact for Contract Coordination with MnDOT for a Community Roadside Landscape Partnership Program for Highway 7, City Project 2016-01. 14. Resolution #2018-06: Accept Public Street & Utility Improvements in Preserve at Rice Lake Project No. 2014-05. 15. Resolution #2018-07: Accept Public Portion of Utility Improvements in Powers Ridge 2nd Addition, Phase III, Powers Ridge Senior Apartments. 16. Resolution #2018-08: Call for Sale 2018A General Obligation Utility Improvement Bonds in the amount of $3.595 Million Dollars. 17. Item Deleted. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Next up is visitor presentation. At this time, by the way we make visitor presentations part of every regularly scheduled council meeting and at this time anyone wishing to address the council, they may come to the podium. State their name and address for the record and make their comments or presentation to the council. Now normally we would restrict the visitor presentations to items that are not included on the agenda tonight but tonight because we have a very short agenda and there may be an item that somebody would like to make a presentation on, they may do so. So if there’s any visitors present that would like to speak to the council on anything, as long as you follow the guidelines that we offer you’re welcomed to speak at this time. Vera Morgan: Is this even regarding to Paisley, the Paisley Park PUD? Mayor Laufenburger: That’s on the agenda this evening ma’am. Vera Morgan: Okay, so I can discuss it? Mayor Laufenburger: Absolutely. That was my invitation. State your name and address for the record. Vera Morgan: My name is Vera Morgan. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 5 Mayor Laufenburger: And would you make sure that microphone is right there, thank you. Vera Morgan: Okay, my name is Vera Morgan. My address, physical address is 5005 Woodland Road, Minnetonka, Minnesota, 55345. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright Ms. Morgan, nice to have you with us. Vera Morgan: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Make your presentation. Vera Morgan: I just wanted to, I was presented at the, I presented at the December hearing and I just wanted to go through a few items. I sent an email earlier today to Kate but I just wanted to go over a few items that I, related to the Paisley Park PUD request. Mayor Laufenburger: You’re welcomed to speak to that, yeah. Vera Morgan: Okay, so my name is Vera Morgan. I have personally known Prince for over 30 years. During the public hearing in December, 2017 regarding the Paisley Park PUD Case 2017- 22 I presented the following question and concerns and request, to have the following request and recommendations. So the first question is per the council recommendation, the temporary request, if it’s granted to sell alcoholic beverages I understand there was a recommendation to restrict it to 500 maximum attendees for those corporate events so my question is, is that now definitely capped at 500 versus a recommendation. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Morgan, you’re welcomed to ask all of your questions and that will likely be discussed during the. Vera Morgan: PUD. Mayor Laufenburger: During the item that we talk about so why don’t you just continue with your comments. Vera Morgan: Okay, so then my concerns are, the catering company does not have the proper licensed bartenders. The catering staff may improperly mix drinks which could increase the chance of intoxication by the attendees and the quest is, if that temporary alcoholic beverage selling is permitted to require that they only, they restrict the alcohol to only beer and wine and not have mixed drinks to reduce the risk and liability to Prince’s estate. The other, second concern is that the Paisley Park representatives stated also in December, 2017 that the corporate events that would be during the Super Bowl would have the following other conditions. That the attendees would only access the facility through the secondary merchandise entrance area. The attendees will not be given tours and will be restricted only to the NPG music club room and the sound stage areas. And the all artifacts will be removed from the NPG music club room and the Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 6 sound stage area and the attendees will not be allowed to access any other part of the facility to just make sure, confirm that that’s actually going to be part in there as a condition. And then the request that I had also was that. Mayor Laufenburger: Please do. Vera Morgan: Okay. The request I had also is that during that, if that temporary license is granted that there are other areas of Paisley Park which need to have additional security. There are several internal entrances that would allow access from that sound stage area, NPG area into the museum that normally do not have Paisley Park security at those internal entrances. They’re not locked because they have to have fire egress so the internal doorway between the merchandise area and the Prince timeline hallway would need to have a person there during the entire time. The internal doorway between NPG music club and the sound stage area. There’s also a doorway from the sound stage area into the Prince’s, there’s a $1,000 piano room area. They know what I’m referring to when I say that. And there’s also an internal stair, two stairwells leading up to, from the NPG music club that go into an upstairs green room restricted area. And then there’s also a couple other internal doorways that go into the kitchen from the NPG area so, and then my last item I had of concern is this Paisley Park representative stated that also they would have, serve and sell the alcohol from 9:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. but the actual original request in the permit was from 9:00 til 11:00 and I’m requesting that to reduce the risk of someone coming in. Becoming intoxicated and not having enough time to reduce the alcohol in your system to only sell the alcohol, if it’s allowed, from 9:00 p.m. til 11:00 p.m. My overall request would be that it’s not approved but I know realistically it appears that they’re leaning towards approving it but to try to restrict it and control it and protect the environment there at Paisley. And also I had a question about confirming that Paisley Park, or the estate has enough liability insurance that would cover in case someone drinks there, leaves and does drunk driving and there’s some type of damages or loss of life if someone leaves there in an intoxicated state and there’s an accident so that was my, those are my items. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you Ms. Morgan. Vera Morgan: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Nice to have you here this evening. Vera Morgan: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there anybody else who would like to speak during visitor presentations at this time? Alright, there being none then I will close visitor presentation. ORDINANCE 630: PAISLEY PARK MUSEUM PUD AMENDMENT. Mayor Laufenburger: Do we have a staff report? Is that you Ms. Aanenson? Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 7 Kate Aanenson: Yes it is. Thank you Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Kate Aanenson: I’m just pulling up a map so this is regarding Paisley Park Museum located at 7801 Audubon. This is the site right here so it gets access off of Highway 5. As you know after the one year, or 6 months after the permitted approval we brought to you how the operations work so we’ve also put in place a special event permit so we’re comingling a couple issues here but just to share with you we did show you what we have for the special event permit and as we indicated when we came back for a 6 month review the sheriff’s office and the fire marshal have both indicated that’s operating very well. We’ve got a good relationship with the management company there. Also every application that comes in, it has to be signed by the fiduciary which is Comerica Bank who is on the signature so we leave it up to them how they decide to, the special events and the like as long as they fall within our criteria. So the request before you tonight is to request an amendment to the PUD. The PUD was for a museum and it was stated that there be no alcohol served. Based on the fact that the Super Bowl is here in town the management company wanted to request a special activities for allowing liquor for corporate events that they’re planning on. The original application was from 7:00 to 11:00 and then also up to 500 to 1,000 people, and I’ll go into a little bit more detail on that in a minute. So again the reason this is before is specifically an amendment to the ordinance allowing during a one week period with the restrictions of that how alcohol could be served so we’re not granting a liquor license tonight here. We’re allowing them to proceed to get a caterer’s license or the like for that purpose. Again as I stated in the analysis the request was originally from 7:00 to 11:00 and in the original application in talking to the applicant, stating that there’s corporate events. So these are coming by buses so it’s a controlled environment coming in and by the time they’re getting there there’s a lot of activities going on downtown and listening to the testimony the Planning Commission felt like they may give some additional consideration of that. In lieu of that there was the request from 500 to 1,000 guests that they anticipated. It sounds like there would never be 1,000 guests but they may be considering or may want to revisit the number of people there so that was on the original application. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing. There was testimony on that and I’ll just summarize that. The operation of the venue which is included in the event. I just want to clarify for you our role in that is they submit a special event permit so we’ve got that in the requirement. That’s been running smoothly. It’s part of that special event permit. The fire marshal does inspect how many people is going to be there. Looking at the temporary tent structure that they’re going to have people come and use it to before they enter the building so that’s run very smoothly so we’ve got that set up. Again the requirement for the caterer’s license. They would submit that. Again the original request was on the application for it was 1,000 and so there was a discussion on that and the hours of operation. The applicant did ask to Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 8 modify til 1:00 a.m. and I think the discussion on that came out with all the activities, by the time they got here it might be closer by the time they got here. You know 11:00 would come pretty quickly. They might not be getting here til later. The Planning Commission felt comfortable with the 1:00 a.m., which is kind of our standard. We chose not to extend our liquor ordinance or our beverage serving so that would be in compliance with that. But they did look at maybe only 500 but I’ll let the applicant speak to that what they’ve got and then also someone spoke about concerns regarding sex trafficking so again the Planning Commission discussed all these issues and the recommendations of the number of guests and they thought maybe 500 might be appropriate and then also they felt extending is to 1:00 a.m., they’re all coming in on buses. This is a corporate event and they’re managing that so the commission did vote 3 to 1 in supporting the amendment and the Minutes were attached in your packet too. So with that again I think the applicant may want to have some discussion regarding the number of people permitted but again the original ordinance it goes up to 1,200 and that’s really how they set up the room so that’s, those are inspected so if they’re a different sized room. Different set up the fire marshal or the assistant fire marshal would step up, or the fire chief would actually pay a visit on that and we’ve got a great working relationship with Paisley Park so we don’t see that as a problem. Again the sheriff’s office is available on need but they’re contracting with their security which is standard as part of a permit so that’s not any big issue there. Again that’s how we’ve operated in the past so with that I’d be happy to answer any questions you have. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright thank you Ms. Aanenson. Let’s see. Council members any question of staff before I invite the applicant up to speak? Okay, we may have some questions after the applicant speaks but I just, I want to clarify one thing Ms. Aanenson. Mr. Knutson this may be to you. Does State Statute allow us to issue a temporary amendment to a PUD to allow liquor distribution? Or is that not a State Statute? Roger Knutson: Several things are involved. PUD amendment is consistent with State law. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Roger Knutson: It’s not a temporary amendment in a sense. It’s a permanent amendment but it says you can only sell, have liquor sales and consumption during the period and time specified. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, so that’s so it’s a permanent amendment but the language of the amendment specifies only January 29th through February 4th. Roger Knutson: That’s correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And this is in accordance with State law we’re able to do this. Roger Knutson: Yes. So we’re clear, you’re not issuing or approving any liquor license tonight. Mayor Laufenburger: Right. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 9 Roger Knutson: This is a zoning issue you’re dealing with. Mayor Laufenburger: Right. Roger Knutson: The liquor you know. Mayor Laufenburger: It’s different. Roger Knutson: It’s a different State law and different city ordinance. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor may I have a question of that please. Mayor Laufenburger: Sure, absolutely Councilmember Ryan, go ahead. Councilwoman Ryan: So Mr. Knutson that was actually one of my questions I was going to ask later just in differentiating between a PUD and a liquor license. So with PUD, so the, our ordinance that talks about the time limitations as it relates to a temporary liquor license. That doesn’t apply anywhere within the PUD so the liquor license does not apply to the caterer within the PUD or just. Roger Knutson: The PUD again is zoning and it restricts what’s allowed on the property so they’ll have to comply. If you approve this they’ll have to comply with this and they will also have to comply with State law and city ordinances on liquor sales. Both. Whatever, this will be more restrictive presumably. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Roger Knutson: And so this restrictions would control over any more general statement in State law or city ordinances on liquor sales. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Just a second. Just a second. Councilwoman Ryan: I’m just reading through, I mean you’re familiar with our ordinance so I’m just trying to understand, so I know they requested the one week period and so that falls within. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 10 Kate Aanenson: Certain hours. Councilwoman Ryan: The temporary liquor license ordinance. Kate Aanenson: What it does, that’s the only time they can apply for that license. So they would get a caterer license and that’s the time that they can serve between that week and those hours. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah and just to clarify Mayor, City Council members. Liquor can be sold at Paisley Park under this PUD amendment from February, Sunday, February 4th. Mayor Laufenburger: No. Todd Gerhardt: Or January 29th. Monday, January 29th to Sunday, February 4th and liquor sales can occur during that period but they have to, based on this, they haven’t come in and requested any other type of liquor sales so the only option available to them is through a caterer. Mayor Laufenburger: So in other words through somebody who already is licensed to distribute liquor, is that correct? Todd Gerhardt: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So this allows it to be, allows it to occur but they would still have to contract with somebody who has a liquor license such as a caterer. Kate Aanenson: Correct and if I may. Mayor Laufenburger: Is that correct Ms. Aanenson? Kate Aanenson: That’s correct and if I may, that’s why I put in the special event permit in there because that’s a requirement of special event, they let us know who the caterer is and that they’re licensed and then there’s other things that are a requirement of the special event permit but again those are the special event permits besides the liquor part that we manage on a regular basis with this so. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Councilwoman Ryan: So may I ask a follow up question? Mayor Laufenburger: Absolutely. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 11 Councilwoman Ryan: So then for instance in our consent agenda when we approve the temporary, tonight. The temporary liquor license for St. Hubert’s and Rotary they, I noticed that they fill out the alcohol and gambling enforcement you know division contract. So then does the caterer also fill that out and submit that to the City? Or am I confusing the two? Roger Knutson: A caterer’s permit is issued by the State of Minnesota. To get a caterer’s permit you have to have a license somewhere in the state to sell alcoholic beverages. Say you have a, pick a city outside of Chan. It could be outside of Chanhassen. Mayor Laufenburger: Plymouth. Roger Knutson: It could be in Chan. Mayor Laufenburger: Plymouth, Minnesota. Roger Knutson: Or it could be Timbuktu, Minnesota if there’s such a place. And so then in conjunction with service the food, if you have that caterer’s permit you can come, you could come here for example if you approved this and sell alcoholic beverages. They would not necessarily have to get any license from the city but when a caterer’s coming into a community they have to notify the city that they’re coming in and here’s when we’re coming in and here’s what we’re doing. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Roger Knutson: If they don’t, it wouldn’t necessarily. Councilwoman Ryan: So the State goes through all the background checks and that’s what they do as part of their. Roger Knutson: Or when they got the liquor license say in Timbuktu or Plymouth. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Roger Knutson: They had to get a liquor license and they had to qualify there. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: So that’s what we asked for to be on the permit. Who their vendor is. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And we’ll find that out later. Kate Aanenson: And we’ll find that out who will operate, yep. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 12 Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Let’s do this. There may be other questions that arise but if the applicant is present tonight would you please step to the podium. Identify yourself. Name and address and then, before you begin I have a question for you too so state your name and address please. Karen White: Karen White, 7801 Audubon Road, Chanhassen. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Ms. White would you state what your role is at Paisley Park please. Karen White: Yep, I am in charge of sales and marketing. That involves ticketing, special events, sales. Mayor Laufenburger: So you are here representing PPark Management is that correct? Karen White: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Tell us a little bit about what you, what you want to do Ms. White. Karen White: Well as I mentioned in our last meeting we have corporate groups coming in, looking to come in and host private corporate parties in our sound stage area so again with that they would be serving food and alcohol as a part of their event. There wouldn’t be any cash exchanged. There won’t be any selling of alcohol per se. I know we keep mentioning sales of alcohol but it’s a party. It’s given by the host which is the corporate entity that’s having it so it’s a party with alcohol and food. And music. Mayor Laufenburger: And do you have events scheduled each of the? Karen White: We do and it’s funny since, you know things change so quickly. I’m sure I’ve heard about with the Super Bowl week. Things are changing constantly so we have 3 separate parties so far. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And Ms. White just to clarify you operate as a museum. What are the normal operating hours of your museum? Karen White: During the weekday it’s 10:00 to 6:00. We usually, the last tour takes off around 6:00 so 8:30 we close usually. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 13 Karen White: And then on the weekends we start at 9:00. Mayor Laufenburger: So you have events, scheduled events which, do they include tours at 9:00? During the weekend? Karen White: Yes and then we have a Paisley Park After Dark event where there’s a DJ and dance party that goes til 11:00 and we host those events every other Saturday. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Okay. Well first of all we have experienced what I think Ms. Aanenson has described as a very good working relationship since the museum opened. Can you just talk a little bit about, talk a little bit about the security organization that you have in place for Paisley Park Ms. White? Karen White: Sure. We’ve got a security staff that’s, we have full time and part time security people. A lot, quite a few of them worked there, have worked there for many, many years so we’ve got very experienced people that are covering you know all areas of the museum and different spaces throughout the building so we also will be hiring additional security during that week as well. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. What is the, I recognize that the capacity of events, well let’s go back to your events back during Celebration which was April of 2017. Karen White: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. You had tours and special events that week, is that correct? Karen White: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So how many people did you have inside the facility during Celebration? Can you just speak to that? Karen White: Well at any given time we had 900. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Karen White: So we had, the overall was 1,600-1,700 people or 1,800 people for the event and we split them into two, what we called tracks so the first part of the day was the first group and the second was afternoon evening. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, and Ms. Aanenson can you confirm for me what’s the capacity that the City fire code allows at Paisley? Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 14 Kate Aanenson: 1,250. Mayor Laufenburger: Say that again. Kate Aanenson: 1,250. Mayor Laufenburger: And did you ever, Ms. White do you think you ever had up to 1,250 people during Celebration? I know that was a busy time. Karen White: No, not at one time. No. Definitely not. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. How did you move the people in and out when you had, during Celebration and the reason I reference Celebration is, that sounds closest to what these private parties are going to be. A lot of people coming in. Staying there and then you know taken away. Karen White: Yeah, well one thing that’s kind of nice is this is going to be a lot easier than Celebration because we broke the, as I mentioned we had tracks so let’s say the first track in the morning. We had those people broken into sub-groups and they would go from room to room for panel discussions. Maybe one person was in a panel discussion room. The other one would be taking a tour. One would be eating a meal so we had, that was a lot of coordination. A lot of moving around the building and it was a lot to keep track of. This is going to be really easy. They’re going to come in. They’re going to the sound stage and they’re going to stay there so. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Okay. Yeah just a moment. So you said that liquor will not be sold. Karen White: No. Sold. Mayor Laufenburger: So you are not, Paisley Park is the venue but these other corporations or entities are actually, what would you call them? Are they selling tickets to the parties or are they hosting the parties? Are they inviting? Karen White: They’re just, as far as we know you know details continue to unfold but they’re hosting parties so. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah, yeah. Okay. Karen White: So they’re taking, what I’ve done is I’ve given them a list. Kate has given me the parameters of who can come in and serve food and alcohol. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 15 Karen White: So I’ve given those. I’ve come up with all the different people in the area and supplied that information to our clients so that they can interview them and choose who they want. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh so they can interview who they believe will provide the best service for their customers that are their clients during this time? Karen White: Right, right. Mayor Laufenburger: During this time. Okay, let me pause for a second. Council members any questions for Ms. White? Go ahead Elise. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Just to follow up on the Mayor’s question in terms of the Celebration. I know that you moved a lot of people around and I think it was brought up at the Planning Commission. It’s different than you know having a party and selling alcohol, you know just the tours but so if, if you’re now serving alcohol in the one room and the corporations are selecting the caterer to serve the food and alcohol, which I understand that that’s how it works. Is your security detail prepared to deal with people that are drinking alcohol? Karen White: Oh yeah. Yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: I mean what, I mean for former training… Karen White: Well without getting into too much detail some people work in other jobs that are club related. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Karen White: And you know outside of Paisley Park so we have a lot of experienced, a lot of experienced security people that are, have been around that kind of atmosphere. Bars or clubs. Nightclubs. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And okay I’ll let. Karen White: Is that? Councilwoman Ryan: It does. I mean it just, it’s different than just an open celebration when you’re introducing alcohol into it and I understand that. Karen White: Right. Councilwoman Ryan: So you’re still getting some of the details in terms of the corporate events. Do you have numbers? Are you now requesting over 500? Is it under the 500? Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 16 Karen White: Well it’s good that you brought that up. We would, we knew that we wouldn’t probably have anything with 1,000. That was just again, I had mentioned we were just trying to be conservative just in case. But the parties that we’ve got now, we’ve got two at 500. We’ve got another one that’s looking at 700 to 800 and I was going to ask if that would be something that it would be considered that maybe we could not do 1,000 but maybe a little over 500. Mayor Laufenburger: But just again remind us, Ms. Aanenson right now you have the capacity is 1,250. Kate Aanenson: That’s correct. Mayor Laufenburger: That’s based on a certain seating configuration? Kate Aanenson: That’s correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So the configuration of seating, whether it’s tables with, you know tables with. Kate Aanenson: Whether it’s high tops or tables. Mayor Laufenburger: High tops or tables that configuration would need to come to the City for review by the fire marshal, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: That’s correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Karen White: And I did meet with them to get an understanding of what’s required from us so we’ll have, for every event we will have a schematic and a rendering of what the space will look like for each individual party. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Karen White: So and that’s an agreement that we came up with that we won’t do anything until everything’s approved. And as a matter of fact I’ve told the same thing to our clients that nothing is acceptable until we get the City to approve. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Karen White: Okay so that’s going to be, it’s going to be a different look every night that we have a party. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 17 Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And then. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council. Just to add onto that. City attorney would like to have a specified number in the ordinance. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Right now the ordinance is silent on that. I think what Kate is doing is going back to the PUD but in this circumstance I think we should have a total number for the event per day. Councilwoman Ryan: A max number? Todd Gerhardt: Yeah. Kate Aanenson: Isn’t it in the recommendation? Roger Knutson: But it’s not in the ordinance. Todd Gerhardt: It’s not in the ordinance. Roger Knutson: For example you could say something like, it starts as now liquor sales and consumption except from such and such, which period liquor sale consumptions are permitted and then you could add, if you chose to at private parties with no more than X people in attendance at one time. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Roger Knutson: You can fill in whatever you think the X should be. Mayor Laufenburger: So Elise you understood that? Councilwoman Ryan: Yes, yep. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. Okay. Councilwoman Ryan: And then just talking about bussing. Karen White: Oh yes. Councilwoman Ryan: So they’re coming in, I know again this was some coming from the Planning Commission as well but. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 18 Karen White: Yeah, it’s the only way we can do it. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Karen White: We only have 125 parking spaces so. Councilwoman Ryan: So will Uber be allowed as well? Karen White: Yes. Councilwoman Ryan: Or is that, okay. So Uber, Lyft, whomever is also allowed. Karen White: Yes. Councilwoman Ryan: And they’re all going to come in the same back entrance then. Karen White: Yes, and we talked about this at the last meeting too. We have a one way. It’s very clearly defined one way path for cars to come in and leave the property. As a matter of fact since the last meeting as well we’ve had two people come out that they’ve hired third party parking coordinators. They actually hire people to manage the Uber and Lyft and buses coming in so that’s part of their thing so we’re happy about that as well. They met with our security and parking personnel and came up with plans for getting everybody in and out. Councilwoman Ryan: And once you get the final numbers will they also know how many people are taking the bus? Karen White: Oh absolutely. Yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay so you’ll know the number of buses coming in and then potential. Karen White: Absolutely, we have to. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Karen White: Yeah we have to. For our own sake we have to know. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Karen White: And then we’ll have a guest list as well so we’ll know exactly who’s going to be in the building at any given time too. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. And then just a last question actually that Ms. Morgan brought up in terms of liability insurance. If you could just address that again. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 19 Karen White: Of course, yes we have complete coverage. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Roger Knutson: I should also point out under State law they have to have liability coverage. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Roger Knutson: The amount specified in the law. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Mayor Laufenburger: Anything else Councilmember Ryan at this time? Councilwoman Ryan: Not at this time, thanks. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright. Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Are we still doing questions? Mayor Laufenburger: We’re still doing questions and discussion. Yes, go ahead Ms. White. Karen White: Oh no I didn’t have anything. Vera Morgan: …more questions. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. Morgan, I’m sorry but your time to speak was earlier during the visitor presentations. Vera Morgan: …wait for my questions until she. Mayor Laufenburger: No, not at this time. Ms. Aanenson. And this might, we might need to defer this to Mr. Oehme so don’t leave yet. Karen White: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: What is the closest residence to Paisley Park? Any guess? Kate Aanenson: Sure, it’s about half a mile. I can scale it off. It’s between here, I can measure it for you real quick here. Mayor Laufenburger: So it would like Stone Creek? Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 20 Kate Aanenson: Yeah. You can see. Mayor Laufenburger: No that’s an office right? Kate Aanenson: This is offices. There’s housing there, along there. If you go to here. Mayor Laufenburger: Go from there. What is that? Kate Aanenson: 23. 2,000. Almost half a mile. Mayor Laufenburger: And so as the crow flies, so a half mile. How about to Ms. Gorra? Kate Aanenson: That’s probably the closest. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah. Well you have to go to her home. Not Lake Ann Pavilion. Kate Aanenson: Oops, sorry. Getting all kinds of markers on here. There you go. 1,800. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, so about a third of a mile, okay. Kate Aanenson: That’d be the closest one, correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Ms. White, were you going to make some other comments because I? Karen White: No I wasn’t. I was going to move away. Mayor Laufenburger: No, you can stay right there. Karen White: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Talk about, you’ve been operating now since October of 2016 so that’s roughly 14-15 months right? Karen White: Yep. Mayor Laufenburger: Can you talk about what kind of public safety instances have you had there during that time? By the way have you been employed there the whole time? Karen White: I have. Yep I have. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay so you were one of the original. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 21 Karen White: I was, yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: When it opened, alright. Just talk a little bit about some of the experiences that you’ve had. Karen White: I know of one. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Karen White: We had a guest come in and hit our gate. You know they backed up and hit the fence as you come in so we called the sheriff and he actually found him like a mile down the street so that’s the only incident. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh so this is somebody who attempted to get in? Karen White: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Oh okay. Karen White: Well and I think he was made because he couldn’t get in without a ticket so he backed up and he hit our fence and then took off so that’s about as much drama as we’ve had there. It was exciting. Mayor Laufenburger: Do you, you talked about your security team. For Celebration did you bring in any off duty sheriff’s or Carver County personnel for that? Karen White: You know I honestly don’t know about if they were off duty or, but we did have a lot of extra security people and we’ll do the same for this and for our next celebration as well. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, and Ms. Aanenson I’m assuming that both Chief Johnson and Lieutenant Kittelson, public safety personnel, they review all of these permits is that correct? Kate Aanenson: Yep, and I did speak to Lieutenant Kittelson again and doesn’t anticipate any problems. Like I said we haven’t had any. Of course they’re always available for special, you know if something does arise but again the fire department’s working more closely as they do the inspections prior to the events to make sure the seating arrangements are set as they’re supposed to be. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Ms. Aanenson there have, I have heard comments and read comments that this is all about the City making money. How much revenue will City Hall see as a result of these activities? Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 22 Kate Aanenson: Well for the PUD amendment it’s $300 plus we charge for everyone within 500 feet. A mailing label so I think that’s about $330 and then we charge $100 for the special event permit so $430 is the revenue on that. Mayor Laufenburger: Does that cover the administrative costs to process the permit? Kate Aanenson: Yeah, yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, so $430. Okay is there a city tax on the tickets? Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Laufenburger: We don’t get any of that? Kate Aanenson: No we don’t get any of that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Kate Aanenson: I would say that they do more than one special event permit too so again we’ve got a… Mayor Laufenburger: Oh okay, so actually so it’s a special event permit for each private party, is that correct? Kate Aanenson: Well…of this size. Karen White: No. Kate Aanenson: No not each night, no. I’m just saying this is one activity but they do a number of activities that we do permits on. Karen White: Yeah. Mayor Laufenburger: I’m just talking about Super Bowl week. Kate Aanenson: That’s one activity. Mayor Laufenburger: $430. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 23 Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you. Ms. White another question that I hear people talk about is, what gives you the authority to do this? So PPark Management, what’s the authority under which you operate? Karen White: Well we operate under the guidance and the authority of Comerica which is the personal representative for the estate. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Karen White: And ultimately Judge Eide is the person that I think Comerica answers to. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, so he’s been appointed, Mr. Knutson you probably know this. You’d better know this Mr. Knutson. Roger Knutson: Depends on the question. Mayor Laufenburger: So Judge Eide is assigned the, he is assigned the responsibility of looking over this estate, is that correct? Roger Knutson: Correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. And who gives him that authority? Roger Knutson: He’s elected. He’s a judge. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Alright, so ultimately anything that happens really has to be approved and authorized by him is that correct? Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, and he’s assigned Comerica Bank and Trust as the personal representative so, and they are giving, in fact they actually made application for the permit is that correct? Kate Aanenson: Correct. They sign off everything. Actually the fiduciary was here a couple weeks ago so we have regular conversations as was Paisley. Just to make sure things are running smoothly. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, and they’ve been on the job for about 6-8 months haven’t they? Karen White: Right. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 24 Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, and have you been able to develop a good working relationship with them? Karen White: I don’t, I do work with some of the members of the team there on a limited basis but most of that is handled through other people at Paisley Park. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, but certainly if they were unhappy with anything that you were doing you’d hear about it. Karen White: Oh, oh, yeah. Oh yeah we’d hear about it and we wouldn’t be able to do it, yeah. Everything is very, it’s very, very strict and we have very stringent guidelines on everything we do. Or ask for even for that matter. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. So let’s just clarify Ms. White you are, you, whatever is on the application we understand that we work through that but you would like to, you would like permission to distribute alcohol during private parties after your tour times are done until 1:00 p.m. Karen White: 1:00 a.m. Mayor Laufenburger: Or excuse me. 1:00 a.m. following day and do we need to change the language so it reads February 5th or is that acceptable to call it February 4th, 1:00 a.m. that evening? Mr. Knutson what do you think? Roger Knutson: Through February 4th. If 1:00 a.m., the 5th. Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah, so we should say through February 5th, 1:00 a.m. Todd Gerhardt: Yes. Roger Knutson: Yes. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. So that’s one thing we need to clarify. Karen White: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: And I heard you say that you’re, you think that, you don’t expect to do 1,000 but if we said 1,000 you would manage within that recognizing that the seating chart for whatever capacity would have to be run by the City, is that correct? Karen White: Absolutely and we really aren’t looking for 1,000 people. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, I understand. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 25 Karen White: We definitely don’t want those. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, you’re thinking that 700 or 800 would be. Karen White: 700 or 800 I think is reasonable. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Karen White: And so we would ask that you would consider that. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. I’m wondering will you be selling any merchandise during this time? Karen White: No, actually we won’t be. So far. So we’ve asked some, two of the clients if they were interested and they said they’d let us know. They weren’t really sure so I don’t know. That’s a tough call. I don’t know yet. Mayor Laufenburger: Is there anything that we would have to do to authorize them to sell merchandise? Karen White: I was just going to ask you, is there something you need from us to know? Kate Aanenson: No. Roger Knutson: No. Karen White: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: It’s authorized right now. Kate Aanenson: Correct. Karen White: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, okay. Well I would say Ms. White unless you have any other comments. Council members any other questions you would like to raise? Mr. Campion, looks like you’re just ready to ask something there. Councilman Campion: No, not at this time. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 26 Karen White: Oh I guess I do have one question I think it might be important to ask is if this approved and we’re able to serve alcohol would there be a time, an end point to the alcohol service portion of the evening. If it’s 1:00 a.m. I know somebody said 12:30 or. Roger Knutson: It says 1:00 a.m. in the draft. Karen White: 1:00 a.m., okay great. Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: So, but obviously you know we at the City Hall and City Council have developed a relationship with Paisley Park over these last 15 months that is based on trust and responsibility and obviously we would expect that you wouldn’t want to do anything that would violate that trust. Karen White: That’s, and that’s why I wanted to ask you know what. Mayor Laufenburger: So the responsible management of these parties includes not just alcohol but it includes appropriate movement of people so that we don’t invade citizen space. Karen White: Yep. Mayor Laufenburger: Inside Chanhassen so. Councilwoman Ryan: May I ask a question? Mayor Laufenburger: You certainly can, absolutely. Councilmember Ryan. Councilwoman Ryan: So then would, if they can serve alcohol until 1:00 how late can you be, are you planning on being open all night or? Karen White: No. You know 1:00 was the. Councilwoman Ryan: So then I think that if the party’s closing at 1:00 my suggestion is that liquor sales stops at 12:30. That would be something I would like to see. Roger Knutson: There are no sales. Councilwoman Ryan: I mean service. Mayor Laufenburger: And you’re certainly welcome to that view. In my view I think that the people at Paisley Park, represented by Ms. White understand the, I would just call it the fragile nature of this relationship and I would expect them to use judgment. They may even use judgment to say that they’re going to start wrapping things up at 12:00 midnight so that’s my Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 27 view on that. But I have not made a motion nor have I heard a motion for the discussion so is there anything else you? Councilwoman Ryan: So, well how would you then, if you are planning on closing at 1:00 a.m., I mean how, just out of curiosity. Karen White: Well we just, you know the house lights go on. Security starts moving people out of the building. Councilwoman Ryan: Alright, okay. Karen White: It’s amazing how quickly we get people out of there. Councilwoman Ryan: When you stop serving alcohol. Karen White: Yeah, yeah, we have really good practice so we’ve had great practice. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Roger Knutson: Just to be clear the ordinance as drafted says consumption of alcohol must stop by 1:00. Karen White: Okay. Mayor Laufenburger: So that also means stops at 1:00 at Paisley so people could not take alcohol with them. Roger Knutson: Correct, they can’t leave with it. Mayor Laufenburger: They can’t leave with it, okay. Alright. Todd Gerhardt: In fact Mayor the security should take all alcohol beverages held after 1:00 away from people. Because no consumption can occur after 1:00 a.m. Karen White: Perfect. Mayor Laufenburger: Will you be lighting Paisley in the colors of the Minnesota Vikings? Karen White: Well I think that’s already taken care of. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, I think you’re right. Alright. Any other? Councilwoman Ryan: Mr. Mayor, I just have a few more. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 28 Mayor Laufenburger: Please. Councilwoman Ryan: Not for you. Karen White: Oh okay. Councilwoman Ryan: This is more staff questions. Mayor Laufenburger: Ms. White I think we’re done with you for. Karen White: Okay, alright thanks. Mayor Laufenburger: But we reserve the right to recall a witness though, okay. Alright. Councilmember Ryan, go ahead. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you Mayor. So in terms, now that it’s not, I guess I was under the assumption that it was just buses so. Kate Aanenson: I would say the majority are going to come by buses. Councilwoman Ryan: Buses. Kate Aanenson: As I understand it. Karen White: That is the majority, absolutely. Kate Aanenson: Absolutely so the corporate event. Councilwoman Ryan: Right. Kate Aanenson: Is going to find their caterer. Pick what they want to serve and they’re going to rent nice buses and bring people out here. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Kate Aanenson: Yeah. Councilwoman Ryan: And do we, I just don’t recall, do we, you know with the traffic with the Lyft or the Uber’s coming in you know towards the end of the night, is it something that you’d be able to handle if people said I want to go out. I don’t want to get back on the bus and go back to the hotel so I’m going to call Lyft and Uber to come and pick me up. How are we managing that process or how will you, I guess I do have more questions for you? Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 29 Karen White: We’ve got the space. We’re got a perfect setup for drop off and pick up and it’s just a circle. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Karen White: So again Kate’s right, there’s going to be very few Uber and Lyft. We just can’t forbid it to happen. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Karen White: I mean we can’t do that. What if somebody misses their bus. Councilwoman Ryan: Right, okay. Karen White: They’re going to take Lyft or Uber. Kate Aanenson: The intention is if you’re at a corporate event you’re going to go back on. Councilwoman Ryan: Well, the best laid plans. Kate Aanenson: But again some people might not get on the bus, I would agree. Councilwoman Ryan: So I just was curious how that’s managed from a different standpoint. And then I don’t know if this is for you Mr. Knutson or Mr. Gerhardt or Ms. Aanenson but I got an email today talking about, and this has to do with the PUD and who owns and Comerica and representing the family but it has to do with taxes and I know we’re talking specifically about the Paisley Park site and, but one of Prince’s properties they’re delinquent in taxes for their 2016 year and I know under our liquor license. I have the, I did my research today but I have the ordinance and it doesn’t allow for liquor license to be, I know this isn’t, it’s the caterer that has the liquor license but they’re not able to sell alcohol if they’re delinquent in taxes and so I just am curious if that is not applicable because it’s not under this specific PUD. Todd Gerhardt: We’ll verify to see if the museum is current in their taxes. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. The museum is. It’s the property to the west. Todd Gerhardt: Yeah, and that is not a part of this PUD agreement. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay, so it doesn’t, even though it’s all under Comerica it doesn’t matter. Kate Aanenson: Actually it isn’t under Comerica. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 30 Mayor Laufenburger: Yeah. Yeah. Councilman McDonald: It belongs to a Trust. Kate Aanenson: That’s not part of the PUD. Councilwoman Ryan: And that’s why, I got an email about it and I wasn’t clear on it so I wanted to understand. Todd Gerhardt: No it’s. Mayor Laufenburger: So let’s just clarify. This is property roughly 30 acres immediately to the west of Audubon Road. This is property that is owned by a Trust Love for One Another. Kate Aanenson: That’s correct. Mayor Laufenburger: Not part of the estate. At some point it may be part of the estate but that’s not our responsibility so. Councilwoman Ryan: So it doesn’t all fall under the same jurisdiction. Kate Aanenson: No. Mayor Laufenburger: No. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Okay I just wanted to clarify, thank you. Todd Gerhardt: And just so the council understands when you don’t pay your property taxes there’s penalties and interest that go along with it that own those double, if not triple your property taxes so the incentive is to pay those and you have to go to 3 years of delinquency before there’s a sheriff’s sale and at the sheriff’s sale then the property would be sold and the first revenues derived from the sale of the property are to pay the property taxes. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay so since this is specifically under the PUD, this amendment, the delinquent taxes have nothing to do with this correct? Todd Gerhardt: No. Councilwoman Ryan: Okay. Todd Gerhardt: Nope I just gave you a little delinquent tax information. Councilwoman Ryan: Thank you. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 31 Roger Knutson: You’re welcome. Councilwoman Ryan: It was posed to me so I wanted to make sure I ask the question. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, I think just I want to make a couple comments before I ask for some action by the council. For those of you that are in the chambers as well as those of you that may be watching Mediacom or online, the entire record of this item, including the public hearing which was held at the Planning Commission. All the documentation. Council has had an opportunity to review all of this so there are many things that perhaps were not talked about this evening but council had an opportunity to review all of those items including all emails that were received. Either individually by council members or by city staff so we have reviewed and looked at all of these items and so though your particular item may not have been discussed tonight, trust me the council has had an opportunity to review that and if they felt appropriate they asked the questions. Kind of like what, the question that Councilmember Ryan received from an email that she received so we have given this substantial consideration. I appreciate all of the people that spoke both at the public hearing at the Planning Commission as well as Ms. Morgan who spoke with us this evening and Ms. White, thank you very much for representing Paisley Park and I’m wondering if there’s any council member that would like to make a motion at this time. Councilman McDonald: Mr. Mayor. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. McDonald. Councilman McDonald: Well I’d like to make a motion but I want to make an amendment first. Mayor Laufenburger: Well make your motion the way you would like it to be read. Councilman McDonald: Then what I would do is make a motion that the City Council approves an ordinance amending the Paisley Park Museum Planned Unit Development to allow alcohol. Well this is not really alcohol sales but. Mayor Laufenburger: No. Councilman McDonald: It is alcohol sales at Paisley Park Museum from Monday, January 29, 2018 through, and now should this be Monday? Mayor Laufenburger: Monday, yes. Councilman McDonald: Monday, February 5, 2018 between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and until 1:00 a.m. with the recommendations of limiting the number of guests to 1,000 per night. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 32 Roger Knutson: Can I suggest at the end you say, with period. Which period liquor sales and consumption is permitted at private parties with no more than, what did you say, 1,000? Councilman McDonald: 1,000. Roger Knutson: 1,000 people in attendance at one time. Councilman McDonald: Okay. I would agree with that. Mayor Laufenburger: Nann I want to ask you this question. Do you think you got that for the record? Todd Gerhardt: Yep. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay, alright. So we have a valid motion essentially to allow liquor sales and consumption at private parties 29th through Monday the 5th from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. with limiting the number of guests to no more than 1,000 per. Roger Knutson: In attendance at one time. Mayor Laufenburger: 1,000 in attendance at one time, okay. We have a motion. Is there a second? Councilman Campion: Second. Mayor Laufenburger: Alright, thank you Mr. Campion. So we have a valid motion and second. Is there any further discussion at this time? Mr. McDonald go ahead. Councilman McDonald: What I wanted to say is that whenever this first came before the council many months ago I was a little reluctant, as you can remember, but since you have been operating the museum I have not heard of any problems and all the concerns that I had were alleviated by I think what you did as far as the redoing the traffic pattern within the museum. Not allowing people to turn in immediately off of Arboretum Boulevard or Highway 5. Again during the Celebration period I figured if we were going to have a problem we would have it then. I got a few friends in law enforcement and nothing. It was pretty much a non-event as far as law enforcement in the community so I just wanted to commend you. I think that everyone listened to the concerns that we had within the community about traffic and about noise and about spillage of people and I think you’ve done an excellent job an I’m really you know quite proud now that Paisley Park is part of our community and I’m hoping that going forward we can improve upon our relationship and it can become one of mutual benefit to both parties so that’s why I’m really supporting this tonight. I see it as being no different than what we do for St. Hubert’s Church or for what we do for the Rotary. Both of whom are good citizens within our community and who again understand the, I don’t want to say dangers but I guess the Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 33 responsibility of serving alcohol at a public gathering. Both of them have done an excellent job of doing that throughout the years and I think that you’re well on the road to joining that group. So because of that I think that we should allow you to go ahead and kind of stretch your legs a little bit. An event such as the Super Bowl, it may be another 20 to 25 years before it comes around again but I am all in favor of you doing what you need to do to build up the reputation of the Paisley Park Museum so that’s why I’ve made the motion and I will be supporting it. Mayor Laufenburger: Any other discussion? Okay I would like to add just a couple comments. I think it’s fair to assume, and I’m directing this to you Ms. White. Do not presume that the City Council will always grant such a thing. This will be done on an individual basis. Yes we are amending this PUD, or potentially amending this PUD and it is that language will be permanent but there will be other events, and by the way Mr. McDonald, or Councilmember McDonald, it appears that the Twin Cities has a Super Bowl every 26 years so we could anticipate this again in, I guess it would be ’43. No, ’44. Councilman McDonald: When we build the next new stadium then. Mayor Laufenburger: Well I’m not building a stadium but, so all I would ask is that this will be dealt with as we do many things like this in the city. We don’t view it as necessarily as a precedent but we view it as an opportunity for us to learn how something like this would be granted. Also I do want to say this. I have learned over the last almost, well over the last 22-21 months since Prince passed away in April of 2016, I have learned a great deal about the passion that people all around the world have for Prince, his legacy, his genius, his entertainment excellence and I have learned that there’s a great deal of passion. I would simply say this, though we may have personal views about Prince and his legacy and what he may or may not have wanted, we as a City Council have the responsibility of making the best decision for the city of Chanhassen and this by no means, approving this by no means says that we’re violating the trust that Prince may have put on his organization or his studio. We are doing this because, or if this is approved we’re doing this because it makes sense for the city of Chanhassen. We have learned through I believe the first year of operation there were close to 200,000 people that came into Chanhassen that without Paisley Park operating as a museum likely would not have come to our community and they have learned about the welcoming spirit of our citizens. Of our businesses. The culture of character that we have here in Chanhassen so we are raising the bar and I think that we are presenting Paisley Park with an opportunity to continue to raise that bar for our community and I would assume that if this is approved that Paisley Park, as I would say, you will not be violating the public trust that we at City Hall have placed in you so, so with that, unless there’s any further comment I would ask. We have a motion and a second and we’ve had discussion and all those in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Councilman McDonald moved, Councilman Campion seconded that the Chanhassen City Council approves an Ordinance Amending the Paisley Park Planned Unit Development with the following amendment to Section 1(D)(3): Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 34 3. Liquor sales and consumption except from January 29, 2018 through February 5, 2018 from 7:00 P.M. until 1:00 A.M. during which period liquor sales and consumption are permitted at private parties with no more than 1,000 people in attendance at one time. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Laufenburger: Thank you very much staff. Thank you very much everybody who participated in the dialogue and we wish you the very best of luck in your endeavors Ms. White. Alright, okay. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Mayor Laufenburger: Mr. Gerhardt. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council a few updates. Just help our park and rec department. All our warming houses are open and thanks to the beautiful weather we’ve had this past couple weeks ice is fantastic shape so get our and enjoy Bandimere, the Rec Center, City Center Park, North Lotus Lake and Roundhouse all have skating available so enjoy Minnesota’s beautiful weather that we’re having this week. We did have a watermain break on Tuesday, January 2nd at Red Cedar Point and Juniper Avenue. We were able to keep it isolated to 4 homes and they were out for about 6 hours and that’s not unusual when you have this type of freezing weather. You see a lot of movement in the ground and any weakness in the water lines will show up as a part of that. We also have sent out the proposed franchise fee information. Education brochure. It’s on our website and it has also been sent out in our most recent utility bill cycle process and we’ll continue that mailing out. We have open houses scheduled for February 8th and April 10th from 6:00 to 7:30 in the Wilder Room at the Chanhassen Library so we encourage residents to come and listen and hear about proposed franchise fee to help pay for our pavement management throughout the community. And some other great news, Stephanie Smith, our project engineer had her baby. Lucy on December 31st. Just missed the baby, new baby of the year January 1. Mayor Laufenburger: But you got a tax break. Todd Gerhardt: Yes they got a tax break for 2017 and 8 pounds, 5 ounces and everyone is going great so congratulations to her and her husband and Stephanie is going to be a great mom so that’s all I have. Mayor Laufenburger: Okay. Let me just make a couple other comments. Number one, all those of you that are, you’re fishing, ice fishing efficianos, don’t forget we’ve got Feb Fest coming up on February 3rd. February 3rd. Is it the 34th Annual or? Todd Hoffman: 25th annual. Chanhassen City Council – January 8, 2018 35 Mayor Laufenburger: 25th annual, I was stretching that a little bit. 25th Annual Feb Fest and we’ve got some great new things that are planned in support of Super Bowl weekend. I know Katie’s been working real hard at that so you’ll probably hear more about that at our next council meeting. I’ll extend an invitation but be ready for that. The only other thing I wanted to say is that we had some important visitors into Chanhassen today. Earlier this morning we had a visit Chanhassen from the Minnesota State Senate Capitol Investment Committee. This is the committee chaired by Senator David Senjem. He brought in about 10 of his fellow committee members and some of their staff and they took an opportunity to review our Highway 101 project. What we call up the bluff. This is the upgrade to 101 between Pioneer Trail and Flying Cloud Drive and I’m pleased to say that in cooperation with the entire city staff we wowed them. We don’t know if we’ll get the $9 million dollars that we’re asking for but we asked for $9 million dollars of bonding. On the bonding bill later this spring so that we can bring that project to completion. There’s been a lot of work done on that project over the last several years in cooperation not only the City of Chanhassen. Mr. Oehme but also Carver County and also MnDOT and we’re ready to, we’re ready to begin on that. We just need a little bit more funding in order to complete that but I want the citizens to know that we’re working very hard to make an upgrade to that 1.1 mile of Highway 101 from Pioneer Trail down to Flying Cloud. We were sort of hoping for an ice storm this morning to demonstrate to the riders on the bus the importance of public safety on that road but unfortunately we got 37 degrees instead but I wish all of you a happy new year and with that I’d accept a motion for adjournment. Councilman Campion moved, Councilman McDonald seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Receive Park & Recreation Minutes dated December 12, 2017 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.2. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council Receives the Park & Recreation Commission Minutes dated December 12, 2017.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES DECEMBER 12, 2017 Chairman Scharfenberg called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Scharfenberg, Cole Kelly, Rick Echternacht, Jim Boettcher, Jennifer Hougham, Karl Tsuchiya, Meredith Petouvis, and Grant Schaeferle MEMBERS ABSENT: Lauren Dale STAFF PRESENT: Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent; Katie Matthews, Recreation Supervisor; Jodie Sarles, Recreation Center Manager; Adam Beers, Park Superintendent; and Susan Bill, Senior Center Coordinator APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Chairman Scharfenberg added an update from Todd Hoffman on action taken by the City Council on the Capital Improvement Program. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Boettcher moved, Echternacht seconded to approve the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting dated November 28, 2017 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON THE PARK AND RECREATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP). Todd Hoffman provided an update on action taken by the City Council on the Capital Improvement Program pertaining to ballfield lighting at Lake Susan Park. RECREATION CENTER UPDATE. Jodie Sarles provided an update on programming at the Recreation Center. PARK AND TRAIL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS REPORT. Adam Beers provided an update on work being done by the Park Maintenance department. SENIOR CENTER UPDATE. Sue Bill provided an update on programming at the Senior Center. Park and Recreation Commission Summary – December 12, 2017 2 RECREATION PROGRAMS: TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY EVALUATION. Katie Matthews provided an update on the Tree Lighting Ceremony that was held at City Center Park. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Todd Hoffman provided an update on the Cathcart Park Maintenance Agreement and the possible annexation of Cathcart Park to the City of Shorewood. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT TH 5 REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN, CARVER COUNTY PARKS. Todd Hoffman reviewed highlights for this item. Commission members asked for clarification on the City’s portion of costs and maintenance for the trail in the Arboretum before making the following motion. Kelly moved, Boettcher seconded that the Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approves a resolution supporting the TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan prepared by Carver County. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. Todd Hoffman provided an update on development of Prince’s property and the need to initiate a master plan for the expansion of Lake Ann Park as a part of that process. Boettcher moved, Echternacht seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Submitted by Todd Hoffman Park and Rec Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 12, 2017 Chairman Scharfenberg called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Steve Scharfenberg, Cole Kelly, Rick Echternacht, Jim Boettcher, Jennifer Hougham, Karl Tsuchiya, Meredith Petouvis, and Grant Schaeferle MEMBERS ABSENT: Lauren Dale STAFF PRESENT: Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director; Jerry Ruegemer, Recreation Superintendent; Katie Matthews, Recreation Supervisor; Jodie Sarles, Recreation Center Manager; Adam Beers, Park Superintendent; and Susan Bill, Senior Center Coordinator APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Scharfenberg: Do we have any additions or changes to the agenda? I would just add a number 2, either under it could be old business or new business but an update from Todd on CIP and last night’s action from the City Council as to CIP. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS. None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Boettcher moved, Echternacht seconded to approve the verbatim and summary Minutes of the Park and Recreation Commission meeting dated November 28, 2017 as presented. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL ACTION ON THE PARK AND RECREATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP). Scharfenberg: Then we’re going to skip under new business because our presenter is not here yet tonight. Todd why don’t we just go to the CIP and you can address that please. Hoffman: Sounds great. Thank you Chair Scharfenberg, members of the commission. Last evening the City Council did approve the 2018 budget and CIP in addition to a variety of other budgetary items. So the main topic of discussion as a part of the CIP was Lake Susan ballfield lights. In October the City Council reviewed your recommendation to include lighting of Lake Susan ballfield at a number of $305,000 which did increase from some of the initial presentations and that was to include LED lighting in lieu of metal halide lighting and so the council talked Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 2 about it at the work session on the 9th of October. For those of you that were present and then there was some sentiment that they would like to push it off a year into 2019 at that time but at the conclusion of that work session they directed staff to leave it in 2018 and then they would pick it up at a later discussion in December as a part of their budgetary process. In the meantime our finance department thought there was enough at least questioned amongst the council and also their belief that the fund balance was being driven down to an area that typically the commission does not like to see the CIP go down to so they did move it into 2019. That did not meet favor of our local athletic association and they showed up with a variety of people last night and also sent email correspondence to all of our elected officials about their attendance and their desire to see it remain in 2018. So at the conclusion of that discussion the council did put the item back in 2018 in the CIP and then they’re going to pick it up and talk about whether or not they do officially want to produce the project and official move forward with it at their, probably their first work session in January which is the first Monday, or excuse me the second Monday. I believe it’s the 8th of January so that will go back on a work session and the council will either confirm or continue that discussion at that time. Scharfenberg: Okay. Any questions for Todd at all? Okay. RECREATION CENTER UPDATE. Scharfenberg: Next we’ll move onto reports. Jodi you’re up first. Sarles: Thank you Chair. Greetings tonight from the Rec Center. We just unleashed 18 super heroes to help save the day out here in Chanhassen so that’s what we did for Small Fry Sports this time around. They learned jumping and super hero action moves and all sorts of fun stuff so they graduated with capes and masks tonight. We’re in our winter session of fall dance with it looks like 153 participants registered. We’re still outstanding about 10 of those that are still waiting to register. Little bit late. We’ve got 24 classes offered right now. As we kind of move on with, it’s been a busy fall with Small Fry Sports so we did football, soccer, and basketball. Little Star Sports we kind of pair them up a little bit so we did basketball and track and field so we have a bunch of little ones out there learning all the sports and all the fun stuff. They get a little medal at the end of their session and they get a certificate. This year we moved them into being Small Fry at ages 3 and 4 and then the Little Stars at 5 and 6. The 4 year olds are a little more successful in the Small Fry and then they move up into that little bit older range then. We’ve had 2 kind of events out there with the Artisan Fair in November. We had about 30 artists there selling all sorts of things for that day and we had, that was a great day for shopping. We had about 500 visitors coming through the rec center. The next one I have the uncanny ability of picking the nicest day for this event. I moved this one 3 years ago from spring to, or from March to December because the weather was always too nice every time I picked it. This year it was 55 degrees on a Saturday in December so shopping was a little bit down this year but still we had 40 vendors in that one participating so. And we’ve had, as we move on to personal training, adult activities, it’s just been a huge year. We have 2 trainers at the Rec Center. One of them works the front desk and one of them is a Tae Kwon Do instructor and they’ve just been Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 3 doing a great job gaining business and with their exposure for being there there’s a lot more interest. Right now they have 210 sessions that they performed this year so that’s a huge increase over last year. And then as always pickleball. Can’t hear enough so we have tried to adjust and accommodate for indoor pickleball now so they have pickleball times at 5:30 in the morning. They’ve got some evening times. Weekend times so every time I get there they’re asking for more and I don’t, they’ve asked for over night times now so at that point I said no. We’re done. That’s about it. Right now we’re in our December punch card sale so if you buy a 40 punch card you get a 10 punch card free and then finally I just invite you all if you’d like to come to attend the Dance for Fun Winter Showcase. It’s kind of a trial run for a recital for a lot of the little ones and another chance for the older girls to perform before they kind of head off to competition and everything this spring so it’s a Saturday, February 3rd. It’s the same day as Feb Fest of course and so we probably need you at Feb Fest more than, but if you’d like to come see the performances they’re at 1:30 and 3:30 that day. Does anybody have any questions? Scharfenberg: Any questions for Jodi? Jodi just with the opening of the new center kind of kitty corner, have you noticed with respect to participation and that or kids signing and any drop off kind of a fall semester so far? Sarles: Yeah. Our dance program’s seen a drop off. There’s also I think 19 dance schools within the area so it also, that’s never helped but that program across the street offers dance during the day for those kids. Our sports program is kind of maintaining right now. We’re seeing a little bit of a switch because of the age differences we put in place this year between the Small Fry and Little Star. We haven’t seen as much change on that program but still I think it is, it does affect us a little bit with them offering that. Scharfenberg: Thank you. Sarles: Sure. Scharfenberg: Adam. PARK AND TRAIL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS REPORT. Beers: Thank you Chair Scharfenberg and commissioners. I’d like to give you guys kind of a little update on what park maintenance has been working on in the last few months. Winter is finally here. I think it’s safe to say we’re going to be in the clear for a while so we’ve been busy getting things shut down and kind of buttoned up for the season. All of our buildings have been winterized. All the drinking fountains have been pulled out and kind of we started some repairs in the buildings and just kind of our annual cleaning and prepping for next season. Docks, piers, paddleboats, those are all in our Lake Ann shop for just a routine maintenance kind of tightening things up and replacing any parts that need to be addressed. Skating rinks. So we finally hit our mark and got some temperatures that are conducive for making ice so starting tonight the crews will be running 24 hour shifts at 11:00 and we’ll just go until we can no longer go any more and Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 4 then we’ll continue to pick back up once the temperatures cool down. I think we have one more shot on Saturday of potentially some warm weather but we’ll see what we can get done in the meantime. We were able to do a bunch of board replacements at North Lotus and we repainted all the strips so things are, you know with these warm temperatures we’ve been able to kind of extend our maintenance into I guess the early winter. Just kind of a typical maintenance practice for us in the fall is we try to get through all the trails to help improvement our ability to plow snow and get the three quarter ton pick-ups down the trails without any issues with branches and trees interfering with our maintenance efforts. And this is a practice we’ll continue throughout the winter just doing our routine pruning and cuttings things back once we get frost in the ground. Finally just wanted to kind of give you guys an update on some of the projects we’ve been working on. I’m sure you guys all have noticed over the last few months there’s been some construction going on in the front of City Hall. I’d like to report that that’s finally complete. The pavers are all in. The new stairs are in. Pretty much everything in phase 1 is done. We do have just a few minor plantings to install in the spring. We’re going to be addressing some of the plant material that’s kind of just reached maturity after what was the year this building was built? Hoffman: ’85. ’81. Beers: So a lot of that plant material is still here so it’s time for a bit of a face lift. Park shelters went well this year at Herman Field, Minnewashta Heights and South Lotus. Herman Field we were able to tear out the old border. We replaced the pea gravel with engineered wood fiber with the addition of that shelter so it was a big face lift for that park and things look really good. If you have a chance to stop out there it’s probably not much to look at now but maybe on Saturday if it gets warm again. And finally our park sign entry, or entry signs at Bandimere and Lake Susan went in this fall so all that was kind of down to the last minute working with the electricians and trying to get everybody. The stone masons in before they had all, I don’t know if you guys drove by and saw them but there was tents around the structures so they could let the cement cure so it’s, we kind of made it at the very last second but all the plant material we put in this fall, or the spring excuse me, from our staff so be looking for that in the spring. If anybody has any questions I’d be glad to answer them. Scharfenberg: Questions for Adam. Kelly: Just a comment. Adam, excuse me. Since that snow we had which was kind of rain and then snow I’ve been walking the trail since then and I think you guys did a great job. I mean it had to be hard. I mean there’s obviously still ice in spots that are impossible to get out but I thought you guys did a great job. Thank you. Beers: Appreciate it. I’ll let the guys know. A lot of pushing slush. Scharfenberg: Thanks Adam. Beers: Yep. Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 5 SENIOR CENTER UPDATE. Scharfenberg: Susan. Bill: Thank you and good evening. As always busy place in the senior center. We continue to offer a variety of programs and they keep coming. We had our holiday program last week. It went great. Four people from Charter Bank were there. They had a wonderful time and before they left I got a handshake and they said we’ll be back next year. Not only in attendance but with a check so we appreciated that. Senior Learning Network programs continue to do wonderful. I’ve got 3 more scheduled for the first of the year. Great part about that is the variety of different programs they offer and we’re able to connect to so I keep offering those and people really enjoy them. We had a busy month in November. I think I’ve mentioned in the past there’s an Act on Alzheimer’s committee that’s been in existence about a year and a half with the committee and then Sharmeen and I we offered 5 programs during the month of November. Every one of them was full. I guess a couple of the highlights. We showed a film at the Chanhassen Cinema. It was called His Neighbor Phil. We had about 60 people in there. The Cinema was more than happy to have us. It was a Thursday night. Maybe at 5:00. I can’t remember what time but it was wonderful. Care givers. Community people all came and we really engaged a lot of people. Another program was we had a neurologist from Ridgeview who gave a talk. We held that one at the library. That was our first lunch and learn program which we continue, which we’ll continue to offer through 2018. We had 60 people there. We had the education director from the Alzheimer’s Association giving a talk on communication strategies. We had a one on one memory screening where 20 people got a little short memory screen and then we ended up with the dementia friends training so all in all a busy month but we had a lot of positive feedback and we engaged a lot of people in the community and it just shows the need for continuing education on dementia. And then special events go well. We had a great Octoberfest celebration. We had Teddy Roosevelt came and talked to us. 2017’s the hundredth year of the National Parks and Teddy Roosevelt was pretty instrumental so there’s a gentleman who portrays Teddy Roosevelt and he did a great job and people loved him. Lastly the day trips. Our fall day trips. We do about 18 trips a year and every one of them is filled to capacity. We probably have 5 trips where we’ve offered 2 buses. We have one bus from Chaska and one from Chan. Last week and Jerry can attest to this, we needed his help. We took 94 people to St. Cloud to see an Andy and Bing Christmas and had lunch. Jerry was on the lucky bus. His bus did not break down like mine did so anyway. Hoffman: Second time that’s happened to you. Bill: Two times yeah, but you know when I look at it two times, been doing trips probably for 10 or more years. 18 a year. 180 trips. Two buses that break down aren’t too bad, yeah. And then another highlight just in closing we did a trip to the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank. Very, very interesting. We all walked away with a little bag of shredded money so we’re fortunate to have so many opportunities around the Twin Cities to offer people and they truly Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 6 enjoy it. And in closing I started a partnership with Victoria. When we know we’re going to take two buses we do one pick up in Victoria and then it comes to the Rec Center to pick the majority of people up but that helps defray the bus cost and that’s been really good and we’ll continue that in 2018 so thank you. Scharfenberg: Any questions for Susan? Hougham: I do, I have one. I saw in your pamphlet you have wood carving in the wood carving room. Where would that be? Scharfenberg: It’s right back here? Haven’t you ever been there? Hougham: No. Scharfenberg: Pat will take you back there. Hougham: Alright, I’ll have to see that. Bill: If you’re available tomorrow morning they’re having their annual holiday breakfast and they chat, they carve and they chat so they love to talk about their craft. Thank you. Scharfenberg: Yeah, there’s one right here in the building. Alright, Katie. RECREATION PROGRAMS: TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY EVALUATION. Matthews: Thank you Chair Scharfenberg and commission. This year’s tree lighting ceremony was held on Saturday, December 2nd from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. with the tree being lit around 5:00 or I guess all the trees being lit around 5:15. Councilman Jerry McDonald and Mayor for a Day Jacob, I believe his last name is Bobboltz flipped the switch and that illuminated City Center Park. We had an excellent turn out. I’d say over 500 people in attendance. It was a wonderful holiday celebration that lots of people enjoyed. Refreshments were provided by Buy Chanhassen. Their representative Vernelle Clayton, she coordinates all the food and the drinks that are donated to her from Lunds and Byerlys, Caribou Coffee, Cub Foods and KleinBank. The bonfires, they weren’t really needed this year because it was so warm but they are always a nice little touch that park maintenance staff help set up and then put out at the end of the night. Mustard Seed Landscaping and Garden Center arranges for Santa and an elf and a reindeer to come to this event. Those are always a highlight and we keep kind of making them newer with the Santa’s House and then we’ve got the chair. We try to form, you know Santa gives away candy canes and the reindeer now has a nice little spot for him. Or her. I think the reindeer is actually a lady. But so that everybody can enjoy that. Living Christ Lutheran Church of Chanhassen provided a group of about 20 carolers for the event. They always look forward to this event and we always enjoy having them. This is the 9th annual gingerbread house contest and those were on display. This year we had 10 entries and one of the entries actually had 3 Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 7 houses on it so that’s the most I think we’ve had at least since I’ve been here and then we award the most creative, most difficult and an honorable mention. Although if we continue to get this many we might have to come up with different categories or age categories. And then this is the second year the Southwest Metro Transit has been there and they have done a Toys for Tots donation and this year they added a food donation just to local food pantries. They come with their trolley and they usually have it kind of decorated all Christmassy or wintery so they’re a great addition to the event. Last year we had them as kind of a last minute thing. In talking with them this year we were able to book it down but now that the guy has actually seen the event they’re you know, we’re making on just to make it more well known because they are sometimes off in that corner so we don’t know about them so we’re just kind of working on promoting them more from our aspect and from the Southwest side. Does anybody have any questions? Scharfenberg: Any questions for Katie? Katie, again wonderful event. I stopped by to kind of check it out again and it was very well attended. Part of that I think was due to the weather and the nice weather that evening but just really nice to see young families there coming into the downtown area. Bringing their kids. It was really packed that night and good to see another great event that you guys put on. With respect to the Toys for Tots and the food drive, do we get some donations? Matthews: Yes. Yep we do. There was definitely people there and we have some food donations that were left there that we have picked up and, but like a few Target bags that were left and we’re going to bring those to the food. This is the first. Last year they had like, I think it was a bigger initiative through the whole Southwest Transit because they had like a gift certificate that they were going to do and then this year when I talked to them about it they were kind of, I don’t know if somebody new took over or they weren’t really sure what was going on so that they didn’t have that initiative this year but they’re, definitely looking forward to kind of making it more well know. It’s a great, Toys for Tots is a great organization and this time of year I think people are definitely willing and wanting to help out and give to those less fortunate. Scharfenberg: Okay, thank you. Matthews: Thank you. ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET. Scharfenberg: Todd anything in there that you want to speak to? Hoffman: There is. You’ll notice that the Cathcart Park Maintenance Agreement has been terminated and signed by both communities and now the City of Shorewood has initiated a process pursuing the annexation of that property into their city and so that would be considered by both communities and then the park would be in Shorewood. There would be a little notch out of the northern part of Chanhassen. There’s still a lot of things to discover primarily the location of public utilities and who owns them. Roads and who owns those and whether or not it Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 8 makes sense to take that property off of the city of Chanhassen and annex it into Shorewood or not so the Park and Recreation Commission will not be involved in that process. That would be planning staff, Planning Commission, and the City Council. Scharfenberg: Any questions for Todd regarding that item? Kelly: Yeah Todd, my understanding is the annex laws of Minnesota are very stringent so my, I would guess it can only be done if it’s a friendly annex? Hoffman: I don’t know that to be true or not but the City of Chanhassen is not opposed to the annexation as far as I know. As far as the administration so Mr. Gerhardt has requested that his planning staff start the process. The review process with the City of Shorewood and then move it through Planning Commission and City Council. There’s a lot of details. You can imagine if we still own the roads around so we wrap part of Shorewood with our public roads that may be some issues but there’s a lot of discovery yet to happen. Kelly: Thank you Todd. Scharfenberg: Should we go to the other item? Okay. RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL FOR RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT TH 5 REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN, CARVER COUNTY PARKS. Hoffman: Chair Scharfenberg, members of the commission. Sorry that with…I’m thinking that, I’m hoping that Marty got that mixed up. I’m hoping he’s not driven down the side of the road but we did send the agenda so we thought at least the 6:30 timeframe and I thought I had spoken… Anyway I was on the task force. Jim Boettcher is a Carver County Park Board member as well and so as you move through the report, go through that first and then we’ll run through the presentation that Mr. Walsh had prepared for the commission. Proposed motion this evening is that the Chanhassen Parks and Recreation Commission recommend the City Council approve a resolution supporting the TH, Trunk Highway 5 Regional Trail Master Plan prepared by Carver County. This approval requires a simple majority vote by the commissioners present. I’d like to turn to Marty, Mr. Walsh’s letter to the Parks and Recreation Commission and go to the third paragraph. The proposed plan utilizes existing city trail segments along much of Trunk Highway 5. Additionally a new trail alignment is proposed between Minnewashta Parkway and Century Boulevard where currently no trail exists. That’s the section that would go through the Arboretum and extend throughout that property. The proposed trail alignment crosses the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum property and would extend with an underpass at Trunk Highway 41 on the Lifetime Fitness property before reaching Century Boulevard via the Trunk Highway 5 right-of-way. Both the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and Lifetime Fitness have been partners in our planning process are highly supportive. Again it’s recommended that the parks commission make a recommendation for a resolution of support for the Master Plan to the Chanhassen City Council. And the primary reason, so the City of Chanhassen applied for a Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 9 grant. Transportation Enhancement Grant, oh maybe 4 years ago. 4 to 5 years ago and we were very close so we’re like in, you know just a few points away from receiving that. The next round of application, Mr. Walsh and I sat down and we said why doesn’t the County, if the County applies it’s going to bump it up and assuredly receive the grant so that’s a $1.2 million dollar Transportation Enhancement Grant for 2019 and you can see the cost now is at significantly more than that. $2,547,430. So that grant will cover a portion of the project. The local share, the city share has increased. If you recall there was a place holder. I believe it was $125,000 in 2019. That will move north of $400,000 by the time this is all said and done so that’s of note for your CIP into the future. It’s the same, I would call it cost creep that occurred on the Highway 41 trail as costs increase as a part of the projected project. The city share increases as well. On a 2 ½ million dollar project the $400,000 local contribution obviously still a very good deal. So that’s yet to be completely resolved and then Carver County will be applying for additional grants to fill in the remaining application funding gap so that’s what’s happening with that process. Any questions on the dollar amounts? The process. Where we’ve been to date on this plan and in order to receive even the first grant, the $1.2 million this has to be approved. The regional trail master plan has to be approved. Gone through the public process which Carver County, for those of you who either watch the process or participated, they went through an extensive public input process. Had meetings at the Arboretum. At the Recreation Center and then as a group we met about quarterly to go through this process to develop the master plan. It does not, there’s two options. One goes through the Rec Center property. One just stays on Highway 5 and crosses at grade at Century Boulevard so the plan, it wasn’t like recreating the wheel. A lot of the Trunk Highway 5 regional trail was already in place but it has to be mapped. Vetted with the public and then officially mapped. Kelly: Todd I’ve got a question and actually Jim can probably answer it better than you. So I went to one of the sessions that the Carver County Parks had and they had two different routes going through the Arboretum and one cost a lot more than the other and I’m just kind of curious, and I’m sure the Arboretum had some input into that. I’m just kind of curious Jim what did we come up with? What did you guys come up with as the final route through the Arboretum? Boettcher: You mean the north or south? The entrance? Kelly: Coming through the south entrance all the way through and out the other way. Boettcher: Right. Kelly: There was, between there and the main part of the Arboretum there was two different trails once you got past the main part of the Arboretum there was one trail. Boettcher: The question in there was, were people going to get into the portion of the Arboretum where you normally had to pay or not. That’s, so we took the other course so there wouldn’t be any conflict. They didn’t want people running, walking through, riding, whatever and they’d get Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 10 to this location within the Arboretum and then go take advantage of the other facilities without paying so to meet their request that’s the reason. Kelly: Okay. Hoffman: So you can see on the, it’s the closest, there’s a rest stop noted there but it’s closer to Highway 5 than the other option. Kelly: Okay that’s what I was wondering. It is closer to Highway 5. Hoffman: Stays near the right-of-way. Kelly: Okay. Was there more wetlands to deal with on that one or were there less wetlands to deal with that way? I can’t remember. Hoffman: I’m not aware. Boettcher: It probably was. Kelly: Okay, that’s what I would think. Okay, thank you. Scharfenberg: Todd does any of the stuff within the Arboretum is it existing trails or is it all brand new? Hoffman: On the west end there’s some existing roadway that will be utilized as a trail and there’s that existing connection that goes to the Minnewashta Parkway underpass. The rest of it will be brand new and it will be owned and operated by the Arboretum as far as my understanding when it’s complete and you know there’s really been a positive direction with the Arboretum. Some years ago they did not want to get involved in the local trail system and now they do and they’re aware of the value that it’s going to bring people biking and walking. Primarily biking most likely but running and biking to their facility. They see it as a positive. As a way to build their membership and their support. Community support. So a lot, much of the improvement is currently there but there’s still a big section to go. That underpass under Trunk Highway 41 will not be an easy project but it will set in place the first established grade as you come in. Highway 41 will eventually, the big hill as you go south, that will eventually come down. Once this project is in place the first 500 feet will be set in grade because they’ll have to take that entire section out to accomplish the underpass at that location. It requires quite a bit of coordination to get behind the new sign at the Arboretum and then it requires a substantial right- of-way from Life Time Fitness which they have at least said you know verbally that they will approve and donate to the project as a part of being a partner to the trail project. Obviously Life Time Fitness if you can go to the club and run to the Arboretum and back that’s going to be a pretty nice amenity for Life Time Fitness as well. Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 11 Scharfenberg: So does the $400,000 that you talked about number include the underpass at 41 or is there money in addition to that? Hoffman: Nope. The $2.5 that’s the total project. That includes the underpass at 41. Our local match goes into that $2.5 million. Scharfenberg: Okay. Echternacht: Is that underpass going to be larger than the one that’s north of 5? That underpass. Hoffman: Probably similar to that. Echternacht: Similar. Hoffman: The one that was put at the regional trail? Echternacht: Yeah. Hoffman: Or regional park, yep. Similar to that. The exact design yet to be developed but similar underpass to that. Lit. Illuminated and it needs to go, you know as you rise up that hill you’re going to gain some height. Elevation on the top side which helps it but it still has to get through and then behind the sign. They also put some high pressure gas lines there if you noticed and I’m hoping that doesn’t add some additional design issues or costs to the project. That was just recently completed here this summer if you saw that work on the trunk highway right-of-way at that location. Scharfenberg: So just to clarify the trail, when you come out under the underpass will go behind the sign? It won’t be in front of sign? Hoffman: As far as I know it’s going to be, go behind. Depending on what design because the underpass needs to slide south and so at that point you’re almost behind the sign already. Scharfenberg: Okay. Petouvis: How is the City’s share of the project calculated? Hoffman: That’s a question I don’t know exactly and so some sort of formula that I can get you that answer. If Marty was here he could answer that. I apologize. Scharfenberg: Any other questions for Todd? Hoffman: Commissioner there’s a, I don’t want to guess but there’s a local trail match that the County has a formula that they set in place and depending on if it’s a regional trail or local trail, Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 12 that’s how they calculate who’s going to pay and so I would, I’m guessing that’s where that comes up but then we’ll get you that information. Petouvis: Thank you. Echternacht: Todd I noticed on documents, City of Chanhassen, Carver and Hennepin County, Minnesota where I guess the mayor signs it and Todd signs it. I don’t know if it’s a typo but it says Whereas the Carver County proposes a regional trail master plan consistent with the Highway 5 Regional Trail Search Corridor of the Metropolitan Council and it has 20440. I imagine it’s 2044. Hoffman: Yeah that’s been corrected already but we had a chuckle about that. That that’s really some advanced planning. That’s a good catch. Scharfenberg: Good proof reading, yeah. Good proof reading. Hoffman: That’s been corrected. Echternacht: Okay. Hoffman: Mr. Walsh actually caught that. Scharfenberg: Todd, once this is in place in terms of maintenance, how is that handled going forward? Hoffman: So what we anticipate is the City will maintain and plow to the Arboretum property. Both east and west. Inside the Arboretum it will all be both seasonal maintenance and long term maintenance would be the Arboretum. It will be on their property. It will be their public improvement. Scharfenberg: And then ultimately you know after, you know if there’s, you know the pavement needs to be replaced or something like that who, if it’s within the Arboretum who does that fall upon? Hoffman: Again I think once you go inside the Arboretum they’re going to be responsible unless there’s some other agreement that’s made as we move through this process. Scharfenberg: So there’s not a joint powers agreement on something like this? Hoffman: There may be when it’s all said and done and so there’ll be an agreement on both the County City and then the County Arboretum and we’ll see how that all plays out. I’ve been in half a dozen meetings with Marty and Peter Moe at the Arboretum and Peter has always Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 13 represented that they’ll accept responsibility for the trail inside the Arboretum but until those agreements are created we don’t know exactly what that would look like. Scharfenberg: Any other questions for Todd? Kelly: Do we know what they’re going to do with the gate once the trail comes through? Hoffman: The Arboretum has some, you know they’re going to leave it as is as far as I know and I’m not sure if there’s, if they’ve put an opening to the gate yet or if you still have to open the gate. Kelly: Every time I’ve biked through I got to get off and open the gate and walk through there. Hoffman: Yeah, so those are operational items that are negotiable. The Arboretum once we’re on their property they have some say in how they operate. The theft of the statues occurred. They think it occurred on that, through that trail in the evening so they were very concerned about that, and upset about that loss at the Arboretum. But when you’re dealing with the infusion of federal funds and into a property like this, open public access is going to become a topic of conversation. The trail group that planned it, you know they said a lot of people say you want to commute to work and you’re leaving at 5:00 a.m. You’re going to have to get through the Arboretum at 5:00 a.m. so how is that going to happen so that conversation is also underway. Kelly: Okay, thank you Todd. Scharfenberg: Anybody else? Can I have a motion? Kelly: Yeah I’ll propose a motion that the Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approves a resolution supporting the TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan prepared by Carver County. Scharfenberg: Okay, we have a motion. Do we have a second? Boettcher: Second. Scharfenberg: We have a motion and a second. Kelly moved, Boettcher seconded that the Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approves a resolution supporting the TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan prepared by Carver County. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. Scharfenberg: Alright, any other items that anybody else would like to address before we adjourn? Todd. Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 14 Hoffman: Chair Scharfenberg I have one. Just an update. So with Prince’s passing we all knew that eventually some action would take place on his properties in Chanhassen. Many of them have been sold by the estate and those working on that. Currently staff has been meeting with a variety of potential buyers of the large property on Lake Ann and so as a part of that, I’m representing the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the Lake Ann, proposed Lake Ann expansion. To date there’s not been real alarm by that plan but I want to make you aware that in 2018 we’ll have dual key financial strategy proposals to the City Council dealing with that. One will be the suggestion that we start, initiate a master plan for the expansion of Lake Ann Park as a part of that process and then Ms. Aanenson, the planning, Community Development Director will also be going about KFS to density transfer out the homes that could go on the preservation area and to put those on the large area over near Galpin Boulevard so there’s a couple things going on. Many residents have talked to me over the years about the City should just go and buy all the property and then sell back what we don’t want to developers or just go buy the part that we wanted. And that’s always an option but it obviously takes a good amount of money to make that happen whereas through the development process the City has tools that can accomplish that potentially without any expenditures to the local taxpayers or the community and so park dedication is the first application so you’ll take the developable ground that’s high and can be developed. You’ll take 10 percent of that and that will be the first taking from between the two lakes. 10 percent of what they’re developing into homes. And then the rest, you’re going to study well how many more homes, additional homes could be built in this area and you really want to make it a win/win for everyone and if you take that density out of there, they don’t have to put infrastructure cost which would be expensive to get roads and sewer and water across to that area because it’s quite isolated to that large wetland. So they wouldn’t have to get those roads across. Infrastructure across to service those homes so they save that money and then if you transfer over that density, you actually change the mix of the housing which they think is very attractive and our planners think is very attractive. Instead of just having all large lot residential. Change up the mix and have some large lot residential neighboring what’s currently there and then change up the mix and have some villas. Some of those type of products and more in the center of the development and near Galpin Boulevard. And then everybody has access to that natural preserve area and so the story I’m telling you here, the description is what we’ve been telling all of these applicants that have been coming in or potential applicants. Potential buyers of the property and just wanted to make you aware that that’s going to be a big discussion item in 2018 and potential beyond and staff will engage the commission at the appropriate time in that process. Obviously if the council moves forward with the key financial strategy to develop a master plan, you would be leading that effort. Scharfenberg: Any questions for Todd? Tsuchiya: Todd so far has it been developers that have been interested instead of private parties? Hoffman: Yes. Park and Recreation Commission – December 12, 2017 15 Tsuchiya: Okay. Scharfenberg: Do I have a motion for adjournment? Boettcher moved, Echternacht seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. The Park and Recreation Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Submitted by Todd Hoffman Park and Rec Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 2, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.3. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: N/A PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives Planning Commission Minutes dated January 2, 2018." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JANUARY 2, 2018 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Steve Weick, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; MacKenzie Walters, Planner; and Vanessa Strong, Water Resource Coordinator PUBLIC PRESENT: Nathan & Daryl Kirt 50 Hill Street Howard Anderson 3613 Red Cedar Point Road Brianna & Wyatt Kirt 50 Hill Street Dave & Mike Tompt 16994 Tremdar Lane, Eden Prairie Linda Scott & Sue Morgan 4031 Kings Road Debbie Lockhart 3618 Red Cedar Point Road, Excelsior Steve Gunther 3628 Hickory Road, Excelsior PUBLIC HEARING: 3617 RED CEDAR POINT ROAD – VARIANCE FOR HARD COVER, LAKE SETBACK AND FRONT SETBACK TO BUILD A HOUSE. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Tietz asked about construction parking. Chairman Aller asked about off street parking. The applicant Todd Jackson addressed the issues of construction parking and off street parking. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. Debbie Lockhart, 3618 Red Cedar Point Road expressed concern over snowplowing. Steve Gunther, 3629 Hickory Road expressed concern over the front yard setback and that the hard cover variance that will affect lake quality. Chairman Aller closed the public hearing. After comments from commission members the following motion was made. Weick moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves an 11.5 foot front yard setback, a 22.1 foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance, subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: Planning Commission Summary – January 2, 2018 2 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. A title search for the property should be conducted to ensure any/all existing easements are documented. 3. A new 1”=20’ scale survey should be provided as part of the building permit application clearly showing the proposed setbacks and lot coverage for the proposed house and structures. 4. At least one tree must be planted in the front yard, if one is not present after construction. 5. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits across the entire south side. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities beyond those indicated in the tree removal plan shall be replaced. 6. No equipment may be stored within the tree protection area. 7. Appropriate tree protection measures must be taken to protect the rear yard ash from Emerald Ash Borer. 8. The 162 square foot rear patio area is understood to be the property’s water oriented structure. 9. Lot coverage may not exceed 3,319 square feet. 10. The proposed rear patio and driveway areas must be constructed using pervious paver systems. 11. A permanent 20 foot native vegetated buffer must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype with permanent buffer monuments. The buffer may work around the path and stairs. The buffer must be designed and installed by an experienced professional in native shoreline restoration. Design plan must be approved by the Water Resource Coordinator. 12. The property owner must work with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to identify and implement any shoreline restoration projects that would improve ecosystem health and function. Replace riprap with bioengineering solutions is one example. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. Planning Commission Summary – January 2, 2018 3 PUBLIC HEARING: 7052 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY – VARIANCES INCLUDING FRONT YARD SETBACK, WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK AND WETLAND BUFFER WIDTH. Bob Generous and Vanessa Strong presented the staff report on this item. The applicant Daryl Kirt provided background information on what has transpired on his property over the last 30 years. Nathan Kirt asked for clarification of comments made in the staff report. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. Sue Morgan, 4031 Kings Road discussed the issue of beavers damming up the culvert and causing Lake St. Joe’s water level to fluctuate and asked who is responsible for removing debris that has accumulated from clearing the culvert. Chairman Aller closed the public hearing. After comments from commissioners the following motion was made. Madsen moved, Tietz seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals approves a 10 foot wetland buffer variance, requiring a 40 foot wetland buffer, and a 30 foot buffer setback variance, requiring a 20 foot wetland buffer setback, with a 10 foot wetland buffer setback for accessory structures subject to the following conditions and adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. A complete grading, drainage and erosion control plan shall be submitted as part of the building permit application process. 2. Erosion control shall be installed outside the wetland buffer area prior to any on site construction activity. 3. The delineated wetland edge required wetland buffer and structure setbacks shall be shown on the building permit survey. 4. Wetland buffer signs shall be installed at the front building setbacks and at each turn in the wetland buffer for a total of five signs prior to any construction. 5. Any impact to the wetland buffer shall be restored to the satisfaction of the City of Chanhassen prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 6. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from review agencies with jurisdictional authority. All voted in favor, except Commissioner Weick who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 4 to 1. 531 WEST 79TH STREET – PANERA SITE PLAN REVIEW. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Randall asked about limiting the use of EIFS. Commissioner Madsen expressed concern with the shared parking. Planning Commission Summary – January 2, 2018 4 Paul Oehme discussed highlights of the traffic study that was prepared by the applicant. Alan Catchpool with CEI Engineering and Dan Cook, Senior Design Manager for Panera outlined their proposal and design elements. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Tietz moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission approve the site plan for a 4,500 square foot, one-story restaurant with drive through facilities, plans prepared by CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. dated revised 11/30/17, subject to the following conditions, and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendations: Building: 1. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Code (see Table 701.1). 4. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 5. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Engineering: 1. The plans shall be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota prior to recording the site plan agreement. 2. Provide perimeter drainage and utility easements were none exist concurrent with recording the site plan agreement. 3. The applicant must move any feature out from within the City’s drainage and utility easement, including both bioretention basins or the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the City after, but concurrent to the site plan agreement. 4. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two bioretention basins concurrent with recording the site plan agreement. 5. Soil boring locations shall be shown on the grading plan prior to site grading. 6. Indicate finished floor elevation of the adjacent parcel to the east prior to site grading. 7. Provide existing and proposed elevations at each lot corner, top of curb or centerline of the roadway at each lot line extension, center of the proposed driveway at the curbline, and indicate the proposed driveway grade prior to site grading. 8. Indicate information to verify the lowest building opening is a minimum of 1-foot above the emergency overflow elevation of the bioretention basins prior to site grading. 9. Identify soil stockpile areas intended within the site limits prior to site grading. 10. Address review comments identified in the attached letter from MnDOT prior to site grading. Planning Commission Summary – January 2, 2018 5 11. Provide Limited Use Permit (LUP) for the public sidewalk connection prior to recording the site plan agreement. 12. Applicant shall utilize the City’s standard detail for the sidewalk connection prior to site grading. 13. Staff has requested further traffic analysis to include the Market Blvd intersection prior to review for City Council consideration. 14. The applicant’s engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and decreased LOS at the W 79th Street & Great Plain Blvd intersection prior to review for City Council consideration. 15. The applicant’s engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting the site access prior to review for City Council consideration. 16. Prior to review for City Council consideration, the traffic analysis report shall further discuss recommendations for the timing of improvements to the W 79th St & Great Plains Blvd intersection. The recommended ¾ intersection shall include a figure in the Appendix showing the proposed design. Further commentary shall be included related to its operation. 17. Plans shall show the current City detail plates and indicate all of the most up-to-date plates shall be used when the project under construction. 18. The storm sewer piping shall be included on the utility plan prior to recording the site plan agreement. 19. Plan shall include the bioretention basin details with elevations prior to site grading. 20. Recommend applicant review the design for the on-site hydrant. From a long term perspective, the hydrant should be fed by the water service to the parcel it serves. Coordinate with the adjacent property owner to abandon un-necessary water pipe. Otherwise, a maintenance agreement between the two parcels shall be filed to define future maintenance responsibilities and other important business protection aspects prior to site grading. 21. Utility plan indicates 0.87% for the sanitary sewer grade. Revise plan to increase grade to a minimum of 1% prior to site grading. 22. Sanitary sewer service shall be routed the nearest sanitary manhole to facilitate sewer cleaning due to the zoning classification and proposed property use. Prior to site grading, revise the plan to show the existing sanitary service connection to the main shall be abandoned. A short liner shall be used in the sanitary main and the pipe shall be filled with flowable fill or non-shrink grout to the property line. The line shall be capped at the property line. 23. Staff recommends C900 PVC water main pipe material be considered. 24. Recommend testing requirements for the utility piping be considered with the utility design. Install a new gate valve at the property line where the new water service piping ties into the existing service piping. 25. Provide details on the plans for the grease trap prior to site grading. 26. Demolition plan shall include removal of existing service piping to the connection locations prior to site grading. Planning Commission Summary – January 2, 2018 6 27. The applicant shall coordinate with City staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79th Street prior to site grading. 28. Once construction is complete, the applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. Recommend applicant consider flushing of the water service piping when selecting the location for the hydrant. 29. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. 30. The applicant shall obtain permits from all applicable agencies which may include, but is not limited to the MPCA, MnDOT, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, etc. Environmental Resources: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to accommodate more of the required bufferyard trees in the south buffer yard area. 2. The interior width of all landscape islands and peninsulas containing trees must be a minimum of 10 feet. The east island shall be enlarged to a minimum interior width of 10 feet. 3. Any existing trees scheduled to be preserved that are lost due to construction activities shall be replaced. 4. The Colorado spruce listed in the Plant Schedule shall be replaced with Black Hills spruce. 5. Existing ash trees that are preserved must be treated for EAB, as approved by the city. Failure to treat the trees, resulting in their death, will require replacement trees to be planted. Planning: 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the city and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. A copy of the cross access/parking agreement shall be submitted to the city. 3. Wall lighting and the trash enclosure lighting shall comply with city code. 4. The proposed monument sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. 5. Signage shall comply with city code and requires separate sign permits for each sign. 6. Bike racks shall be incorporated on site near the access sidewalk from Highway 5. 7. The building elevations shall be revised to incorporate additional window openings in the bare expanses of the north, west and south walls. 8. The applicant is proposing two color bricks for the building material: tan and brown. The soldier course of brick above the doors and windows shall incorporate the darker colored brick to accent the windows. 9. Brick veneer may not be painted. EIFS may only be used as an accent material and may not cover more than 15 percent of the wall area. 10. Additional rooftop treatments shall be provided above the building entrance. 11. Final architectural details shall be revised and approved prior to City Council review. Planning Commission Summary – January 2, 2018 7 Water Resources: 1. Six inches of topsoil is required and will be verified by city staff. In grading notes on page C3 it states 4 inches. 2. Topsoil needs to be specified. 3. Sequencing of Construction identifies no. 5 as to construct the temporary sedimentation and sediment trap, but nowhere in the grading plan is it identified. Plans should identify the bio-filtration basins be graded to be used as temporary sediment basin, along with temporary outlets to allow stormwater to be pumped and drained too, during construction of the site. 4. A design and planting plan approved by the Water Resources Coordinator is required for this high visibility location. Seed mix is insufficient for these vegetated basins. You must use species native to the ecoregion. 5. Sock should be eliminated from drain tile. Buckshot and or pea rock to surround underdrain pipe. 6. Underdrain tile needs to be identified. Should be a HDPE Corrugated perforated plastic tile. SCH 35, 40 PVC pipe is not allowed for underdrain. 7. Tile in bio-filtration basin needs to be placed on a minimum grade of 0.5 percent. 8. Plan details need to show a profile of the bio-retention basin with the grade of the tile placement. 9. All quantities of materials to be used, and specifications need to be identified on plan sheet for contractor to bid and to construct. 10. Mixed D soil may not be used. We only use 75 percent washed sand and 25 percent leafy compost. 11. Bio-filtration basin should be identified in sequencing that it should not be completed until all surrounding watershed to basins are stabilized. 12. City staff to be called, and be on site when contractor is installing bio-filtration basin to make sure the existing subsoil is scarified 18 inches below surface in bio-filtration basin 13. Contractor to have written statement as part of the pre-construction meeting, the means and method of how they plan to scarify and protect the subsurface from compaction in the bio-retention basin. 14. An approved operation and maintenance plan is required for all stormwater treatment devices. Including contact information for person(s) responsible for maintenance as well as person(s) performing onsite inspection and maintenance duties. The city must approve operation and maintenance plans prior to permits being issued. 15. The city will hold the security on the project until vegetation is well established and the planting is free of weeds. This may take a few growing seasons to achieve. 16. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the drainage basins located west and south of the parking lot. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Madsen noted the verbatim Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 5, 2017 as presented. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. Planning Commission Summary – January 2, 2018 8 ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Kate Aanenson provided an update on City Council action taken by the City Council at their December 11, 2017 and December 18, 2017 meetings and discussed future Planning Commission agenda items. Commissioner Weick moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned 9:15 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 2, 2018 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Steve Weick, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Paul Oehme, City Engineer/Public Works Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; MacKenzie Walters, Planner; and Vanessa Strong, Water Resource Coordinator PUBLIC PRESENT: Nathan & Daryl Kirt 50 Hill Street Howard Anderson 3613 Red Cedar Point Road Brianna & Wyatt Kirt 50 Hill Street Dave & Mike Tompt 16994 Tremdar Lane, Eden Prairie Linda Scott & Sue Morgan 4031 Kings Road Debbie Lockhart 3618 Red Cedar Point Road, Excelsior Steve Gunther 3628 Hickory Road, Excelsior PUBLIC HEARING: 3617 RED CEDAR POINT ROAD – VARIANCE FOR HARD COVER, LAKE SETBACK AND FRONT SETBACK TO BUILD A HOUSE. Walters: Thank you, yep this is Planning Case 2018-01. The 3617 Red Cedar Point Road variance. The applicant is Todd and Kristin Jackson. They are requesting an 11.5 foot front yard setback, 22.1 foot shoreland setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance to construct a detached single family home. So the property is located at 3617 Red Cedar Point. There’s currently an existing structure on a lot which is zoned for residential single family. Because the lot borders the lake the minimum square footage for a lot would be 20,000 square feet. It’d be restricted to 25 percent lot cover, 30 foot front yard setback, 10 foot side yard setbacks, 75 foot shoreland setback, and then our code does allow up to a 250 square foot water oriented accessory structure. So as I mentioned there’s an existing building on the lot and the lot is substandard so it’s current size is 9,222 square feet. Currently the lot has 3,353 square feet of impervious surface largely due to a large pad of Class V gravel in the front lot. It does currently meet the 30 foot front yard setback. It meets the eastern 10 foot side yard setback. There was a shed located about 4 feet from the western side setback and it’s currently set back 52.9 feet from the lake. There is a water oriented structure and a fireplace and little flagstone patio complex that’s about Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 2 24 feet from the lake. And it should be noted that in the front of the property a portion of Red Cedar Point Road is actually within the lot lines and so that 543 square feet that’s covered by the road is not included in the lot coverage or lot area totals. So the applicant is proposing to remove the existing house, the gravel, the shed, the water oriented structure here and the walkway and they are proposing to construct a house with a 3 car garage. A water oriented structure here, which is going to be a rear patio. Driveway. The main justification for the variance is again the lot is significantly smaller than the zoning code would allow. As you saw with the, if the zoning code is applied the building area is extremely limited so they’re requesting relief from the setbacks. The plan is to maintain the existing rear setback from the lake. Bring the side setbacks into compliance and make a slight reduction of 34 square feet of impervious surface. The request is roughly consistent with other variances that have been granted throughout the neighborhood. It’s one of the older neighborhoods in the city. My memory serves we’ve given 16 variances for 25 properties within 500 feet. Many things are non-conforming. They will also be removing the gravel area and replacing it with sod to get some green space in front but they are again requesting a reduction to the front yard setback to accommodate the building envelope. We have received several comments from individuals in the neighborhood. Four individuals have spoken with me. One after going through it had no objections and 3 have expressed concerns. I gave you a handout of several emails we’ve received. That folks sent me after our conversations. Two of the residents with concerns to specifically address parking. Two discussed the large amount of impervious surface being proposed and then general concerns about the height. General aesthetics of the house and it’s fit within the neighborhood. I’ll go into the impervious surface a little bit more in the staff assessment but I did want to address parking in a little more depth than my report did. So I went through and I did my best using Google Streets and the aerials to estimate about how many other parking spaces are present in different properties around the area. The main concerns residents had was just the street is very narrow. It’s really not possible to do off street parking within the neighborhood and this is compounded by the fact that the street is not located within it’s right-of-way so you have situations, you know like this one where a portion of the street is within the lot lines and others where the right-of-way is you know right up against a house. So again I did my best to estimate the number of parking spaces available for the different properties. The 17 properties I looked at, the average works out to about 4 ½ parking spaces per property. That’s including garage and then also a driveway so total accommodation. Our code requires a two car garage and generally a 30 foot driveway which depending on the length of the right-of-way and the length of cars it would be 4 to 6 spaces. The proposal is 4 off street spaces but 3 of those would be the garage. You could get one car on the driveway. If you had a compact car you could probably get 2 but that’s about what the parking is there. So staff looked at it, staff also shared the concern about the impervious surface and Vanessa looked it over. I’m sorry the Water Resource Coordinator looked it over and recommended that staff install conditions requiring a 20 foot buffer to mitigate the increased runoff that would be generated towards the lake. The utilization of permeable pavers for the driveway and rear patio which would, well keep the lot coverage would then stay at 36 percent but it moves the impervious surface down to 29 percent, just over and then also that the applicant work with the Minnehaha Watershed to investigate doing a shoreland restoration process. We felt that if these steps were taken it would significantly improve the Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 3 current storm water management for the parcel and allow staff to support the impervious surface as proposed. Again staff did look at the other variances in the area. The proposed variances are roughly in line with what’s been granted historically in the region and there’s a detailed breakdown of that in the staff report. Staff does agree that parking is an issue in Red Cedar Point but the applicant’s proposed parking is similar to what many of the other properties have and for this reason staff is recommending approval with the conditions outlined in the report. I’d be happy to take any questions at this time. Aller: Anybody want to take the first crack. Tietz: Yeah. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Yes. MacKenzie, you know that is a very restricted, constricted area as you know. Over the last year and a half I think we’ve had 2 or 3 proposals for variances in that neighborhood. You know a big concern that I would have is access during construction and where construction parking goes. I can imagine cement trucks, delivery trucks with trusses and bottling up the street at some length of time and that’s, and the turn around space is very difficult. I guess I’m really curious how that’s going to be handled and how we as a community can protect the neighbors and always maintaining access, whether it’s emergency access or just daily traffic access. The parking I know in our neighborhood there was some recent construction and with everyone trying to get things done before cold weather set in. I guess it set in but there must have been 30 subcontractor cars parked along streets and I think that’s going to be, in this neighborhood in particular it’s a very critical issue. It’s parking long term is a concern and I understand how you assessed it but I think the construction duration parking and access and delivery is really needs to be monitored very, very closely. Walters: I would agree and I know that’s been an issue in several other of the variances in this neighborhood that came before. I would defer that question to the applicant. Ultimately it will be up to them and their builder to work with the City to try to keep access as clear as possible. Tietz: But I can imagine we’re going to, you’re going to receive calls when the contractor doesn’t adhere to the requirements that have been requested by the property owner and I think that’s, you know that’s something that we’re just going to have to be faced with. My other concern is the permeable pavers. Now we’ve talked about this in a couple previous planning commission meetings and I want to be certain that we have a detail for construction that’s appropriate for the purpose that it’s intended. You know there’s a lot of, definitions floating around but what permeable pavers are and how much sub-base and how they’re constructed and then how they’re monitored. I think that we as a city and the city engineer and who all is involved, we need to monitor this installation. All these installations where permeable pavers are used very closely. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 4 Walters: Absolutely. The applicant would need to get any design they proposed signed off for them by the engineering department and the Water Resource Coordinator would have to determine that they met the intent and definition. We would likely use the Permeable Interlocking Concrete Paver Institute that we talked about earlier and their engineering standards as a baseline. Tietz: Okay, thanks. Aller: I guess one of my questions would be, has public safety come in and, for instance fire, police or anyone else or have we been receiving reports as it stands now because it seems like from the information in the report and the public comments that have been provided thus far which will be made part of the record in these emails, we’re concerned with the off street parking and the actual on street parking which would block traffic in that area. Walters: Public safety did not provide any comments and I could not speak to whether or not we’ve had any reports. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: How many extra feet on the driveway would be, would give you space for 2 cars? Two reasonable cars. Walters: That’s a great question. So I researched, if you check my search history there’s a lot of stuff on the average size of an American car right now. Average car is about 16 feet. Figure at least 2 feet you know cushion. At it’s widest the driveway is right around 16 feet. Realistically I’d say you’d probably need to push it back 4 feet to be sure you’d be able to accommodate 2 midsized or you know full sized cars. That’d be my best guess. Weick: Thank you. Aller: And the average parking spots available for off street parking were 4.5? Walters: So not including garages, I would say a lot of the properties did have driveway space for 2 cars. In this case yeah there’d be driveway space for one car if you take the garage space out and just are talking about guest parking. Aller: And the majority of properties now 2 or 3 car garage? Walters: The majority of new constructions are 3 car. And our ordinance’s minimum though is 2 car which is relevant when we talk about standards. Oh sorry, were you asking about the neighborhood or? Oh my apologies. Most of the neighborhood is 2 car garage. Aller: Has 2. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 5 Walters: Yes. Aller: So this would. Walters: There are some with no garages, yeah and some with larger 4 car. Aller: And based on their lot they have additional parking which would be off street regardless of 2 or 3 car garage? Walters: Yep. No I misunderstood that, thank you. Aller: Additional questions at this time for staff based on the report? Seeing none we’ll have the applicant come forward and if they’d like to make a presentation that would be great. Todd Jackson: Well just two comments. Aller: If you could just state your name and address for the record sir, that’d be fantastic. Todd Jackson: Todd Jackson. Two comments. One, we currently have a home right down the block within easy walking distance on Hickory so we don’t live there. It’s a cabin so we would be able to provide plenty of parking for construction. Obviously when they’re dropping off large items for the property they’re going to need to be there so I can’t control that but at least daily crews at the house will be able to have off street parking with about, well it’s 3732 Hickory so it’s, you know if they could move the map it’s, you can walk. It’s on the point so it’s very easy so we would provide that for them. And then secondly on the impervious pavers, our current home on Broken Arrow in Chan, we’ve been there, we built the house 10 years ago. The watershed district came by looking for volunteers to improve the impervious surfaces and do all that stuff. We volunteered. I spent money. I did that so my willingness obviously staff requires it we’ll do it but my willingness to do it regardless I think is proven because of what I’ve done in my current home where it was not required. We just went ahead and did it anyway so those are my two comments. Aller: So before you leave if you could just fill in some of the blanks. We’ve got the report and you’ve had an opportunity to read the report right? Todd Jackson: Yes. Aller: So just tell us about your project. How did you come up with the actual property configuration? What’s your intended use of the property? Are you planning on using the 3 car garage for 3 cars? Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 6 Todd Jackson: I am. So a 3 car garage is a requirement for my wife and me and our children to build a new home so that was something for us that’s a requirement so that’s why we ended up with the design. It’s going to be our primary residence. If you guys pass it we’ll move forward. We’ll build this house. Sell our current house on Broken Arrow and sell the cabin on Hickory and have that be our primary residence and live there and make my life a little less complicated with 2 places down to 1. Aller: Okay. Any additional questions? Commissioner Weick. Weick: Do you have any issues with the length of the driveway? As you’ve planned it and looked at it. Todd Jackson: No. You know it’s funny because I went out and when I got the plans back I looked at the measurements. My daughter drives a Jeep that would be parked out front. That would fit in the 16 foot and the 16 foot spot. It would fit there so you know from my view I could fit 2 vehicles there. Her Jeep on the smaller spot and then a larger vehicle in the second stall plus the 3 car garage. Actually we probably could really get 3 in that driveway, just like we did in the garage so I think we could probably get 6 vehicles there if we had to. Weick: Okay. Todd Jackson: Now they’re not going to, I’m not going to be able to put a Yukon XL out there in the driveway but on the one side I would but not the opposite side so I think we could fit 6 vehicles there. Weick: Okay. Aller: Any additional questions of the applicant? Hearing none thank you very much sir. Todd Jackson: You bet. Aller: At this point in time I’ll open up the matter for public hearing. That’s again an opportunity got individuals to come forward to speak either for or against the item. You can do so by coming forward. Stating your name and address for the record and then just give us your opinion. Anyone wishing to come forward? Have somebody working their way forward. Welcome. If you could state your name and address that’d be great. Debbie Lockhart: Debbie Lockhart. I live at 3618 Red Cedar Point Road, Excelsior and I have a major concern about, because we didn’t hear it in the report, about what the snowplow is going to do because right now, because the Souba house has always been a summer house, the plow always plows right, well it just disappeared. Sorry. Can you put it back again? See where the green is right there. Go up higher. That green. That area right there is where the snowplow goes up and pushes the snow up and then backs down and comes up the road because we are on a Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 7 very skinny road as you all know and there’s really no other place right now for him to go. And that was a concern, I voiced that concern when I talked to MacKenzie earlier but I didn’t see anything. I couldn’t read the report. It wouldn’t come up online for me. What they’re going to do with the snowplow because it is a major concern because I would hate for us to lose the service. Okay, thank you. Aller: That’s a great question, thank you very much. Before we go forward if we go ahead, we won’t stop the public hearing portion of this item yet so let’s go ahead and just mark that down for consideration. Come on forward, yep. We’ll try to get the questions answered at once at the end. Welcome. Steve Gunther: Good evening. My name’s Steve Gunther. I live at 3628 Hickory Road so I’m kind just up the hill from where the Souba’s lot is. A couple things. Living in this area it is difficult because the lots are small and with current building standards etcetera it is, it does require some number of variances to allow a property owner to build something that’s kind of within you know expectations of what people are looking for right now. You know I am okay with the setback from the lake. It seems to be reasonable and consistent with what other neighbors have gotten. I’m glad they’re bringing the side setbacks to the 10 foot expectation which is the standard. I am nervous about the front setback just because I know people will try to park cars there and it sounds like the thought is well I’m just going to leave my daughter’s Jeep out in the front while I’ve got 3 cars already and I’ve got a fourth car it sounds like being suggested to be put in that area but what I’m most concerned about frankly is how the hard cover variance will affect the lake quality. So I’m also the President of the Lake Minnewashta Preservation Association and the most valuable piece of real estate collectively the neighbors have is that lake which sits at the back of the lot. We’ve worked very hard over the years to maintain the lake quality. We’ve actually seen it degrade over time as more of the large homes are built and you know take up residence on the lake and I’m concerned that going from a standard of a 25 percent hard cover for this particular property to a suggested or a requested 36 percent hard cover. I understand there’s a gravel lot or gravel pad that’s already in front of the house. More than likely that was put in without any city approval. That was just put there so I don’t look at that as being the old standard that we’re going to reduce it by .36 percent because it was going from 36.36 percent down to 36 percent. I still view this as a request to go from 25 percent to 36 percent which is you know is how I would judge this request here so I am concerned about the increase in hard cover and I know everyone wants a 3 car garage. I know I’ve had to adjust my structure when we built our’s to get a 2 car front loaded garage. I’m concerned that that extra third car is taking 20 times 24, 500 roughly square feet of extra hard cover which if you eliminated that would be a long way to getting us back closer to the 25 percent so I’d just ask that we take a hard look at the hard cover variance request because more hard cover means more runoff into the water. More runoff into the water leads to degraded lake quality. I am glad the staff has suggested the 20 foot buffer strip because that will certainly help. I don’t understand the pervious versus impervious. I understand you know block versus asphalt but to me it’s all impervious if it’s a stone if you will. So I am concerned about the hard cover Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 8 variance request so I’d just ask you take a careful look at that as you’re making a decision so, thank you. Aller: Thank you. Any other individuals wishing to come forward at this time? Okay, seeing no one come forward I’ll go ahead and close the public hearing and I’ll ask for some comments from our public works and Water Resource Coordinator who are available. Thank you very much for being here. Maybe start with Mr. Oehme about the snowplowing and where we’re going to put that snow. Oehme: Sure. Good evening Chairman Aller and commissioner members. So I did have a conversation with our street crew and specifically the plow driver in this area recently so as Deb had eluded to our snowplow driver drives down Red Cedar Point here. Kind of cleans this area up and then backs up to this area and then turns around so obviously if this property is developed that cannot take place anymore. The City, this area was platted in the early 1900’s and luckily there is a little bit additional right-of-way in this area here so the thought is, is that the snow plow driver in the future would be able to do a three point turn. Basically come down. Stay within this cul-de-sac area here. Come back out and then around. I think there’s going to be, need to be some tree or I think there’s an old cottonwood that might have to go and some brush that have to be cleaned up in that area and then we would also have to talk to this property owner here. I think that property owner parks a car or two right there so we would have to work with them and try to at least in the wintertime you know having an access area so we’re not going to be backing that snowplow into that vehicle there. With this three point turn that we’re talking about it’s actually a safer movement than currently being taken right now. The snowplow driver wouldn’t have to back up you know half a block or whatever onto a public street here to make that turn around. You’d basically be backing up to the north and where there’s no vehicles, would be no vehicles at that point in time so staff is proposing that we would look at cleaning this area up so we can make that turn around at this point instead of down at this property here. Weick: Can I, I’m confused. Oehme: I’m sorry. Weick: The plow can turn around there now because it’s a gravel lot, correct? Oehme: Well there’s, it’s a little restrained right now. There’s I think in most of the time there’s a car or two that’s parked right here and then there’s some brush in the back that doesn’t allow them to back up far enough to make that turn around possible at this time. Weick: I guess what I mean on the subject property. What’s changing on the subject property to change the way the street gets plowed? That’s what I’m. Oehme: Well the road’s not going to get plowed any differently than it is today. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 9 Weick: Okay. Oehme: In front of the subject property. It’s just where he turns around has to change. Right now he backs up onto this property. Weick: Right. Oehme: With his vehicle. With the plow truck and then turns around so we’re not, in the future we’re suggesting we’re not turn around at that point. We’re looking at turning around up where my pointer is. Weick: But it’s the development of the property that’s changing the snowplow, not the setback? Aanenson: Right. I would also say it’s probably not best practices to turn around on private property. Weick: Exactly yeah, but I’m just trying to understand what’s going on there. Oehme: It’s just easier for them to turn around here today versus right at this location just because of the brush and debris and some of the vehicles that are sitting there. Weick: Okay. Okay, thank you. Aller: And in that location where we have the right-of-way it would be our responsibility to keep that maintained at some point anyway. Oehme: That’s correct. It’s in our right-of-way. We just would need to take better housekeeping of that area especially in the winter months. Aller: Okay, and then would the parking be off, the on street parking or off street parking in the right-of-way that’s being utilized by the private homeowner that normally would not be accessible. It’s somewhere it’s basically been gratis because we haven’t used it. Oehme: Correct. So we just would have to work with that property owner to make sure they have the ability to park their vehicles there like they have in the past so. Aller: Okay. And then if we could move onto the storm water drainage and lake clarity that would be great. Strong: Okay, great. So cars come and go literally but I tend to look at a property like this from the perspective of the water so I’m looking at it from the back side. For me how far the impervious is from the actual lake is what I’m trying to protect because that’s something we can’t change and the lake is there forever and that lake is there for everyone. My main concern Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 10 is while we do have a non-conforming use that we need to take into consideration and we need to balance that with the needs of the property owner, we also have to look at what’s best for the lake. And to do that we have to kind of try to balance what’s continuing with maybe ways to implement newer management strategies while balancing non-conforming use but not just continuing to allow them to be the way they are but somehow finding balance to make them a little bit better each step of the way. That’s where the 20 foot buffer comes in. That’s for exchanging it for pervious pavers for all non-necessary impervious surfaces comes in. I understand that pervious pavers are newer to Chanhassen. I have a bit of a history with them and I’m very confident that because of how they’ve been used throughout the Twin Cities metro they are very successful. We have a lot of constrained sites and we’ve had to come up with new ways to treat storm water. Installed correctly is a very important factor. Using the Pervious Paver Institute, which is also supported by MnDOT is usually the best place to start and I’m pretty confident, especially if the homeowner’s already had this installed previously, they’re a very good candidate for installing something that will be maintainable. Another benefit to pervious pavers is that they reduce salt usage and being that close to the water salt use has a significant impact on water quality so they do reduce volume. Most importantly they reduce rate and flow. Combining that with a buffer and then right at the shoreline edge just working on some different strategies to see where we can replace rip rap with more vegetation to create habitat at that high habitat area zone, I think that helps improve the property overall so, but when it comes to pervious pavers you know it’s something that we’re learning here but they have been tried, tested and true within the Twin Cities metro and they do work if installed correctly so. Aller: So I guess one of the things that I would like to know, if it’s possible to get an answer for this, if you take the property as it sits today and you theoretically build a new property in it’s place and you look at both water systems, is it going to be more beneficial to have the new system in place for the lake or to leave it as it is? Does that make sense? Strong: It does. That’s a tricky question to answer. At the end of the day impervious cover is impervious cover. Storm water runoff goes straight to the lake when it hits an impervious surface so I think we’re getting as close as we possible can to an equal trade. Aller: Okay. Strong: It may be slightly worst but I think following through the property owner looks like they’re going to do everything possible to make it an equal trade as much as possible. Understanding again this is a non-conforming use. Aller: Right. Strong: And a unique site. Aller: Okay. Based on my questions and the answer, any other additional questions of staff? Commissioner Randall. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 11 Randall: One of the questions Ms. Lockhart brought up was where that snow gets piled up in that corner. Is that going to be an issue? Or she talked about how it got piled up on the, kind of where that green bush would be. Right in that area I believe. Debbie Lockhart: It comes straight in next to it. Randall: Next to it. Debbie Lockhart: So it’s going straight to, you’re going right next to the yellow house. Between the bush and the yellow house. It goes straight up there. Randall: Okay. Any issues with that as far as watershed or plowing? Oehme: So that’s, this area is really tight to begin with so we’ll do our best to find places within our right-of-way to place that snow. Randall: Okay. Oehme: So like I said we’re going to try to clean up this area a little bit better than it is today and maybe try to pile as much snow over here as we can and not on private property. Strong: It’s proximity to the lakeshore itself and the lake itself, and melting it’s very close in either location. It’s so close it’s very difficult to make a decision as to whether or not it would have an adverse impact on the water. Aller: Any additional questions? Strong: It’s good questions. Aller: Then I’ll open it up for commissioner comment at this point. How are people feeling about the request and would you like to take any action? Commissioner Weick. Weick: Yes, thank you. I think my largest concern is the, you know the lot coverage really isn’t changing. May or may not get better with pervious pavers. I’m not sure. You know how I feel about that so it’s, you know that’s a bit of a disappointment. I don’t think, after hearing everything I don’t think there’s an issue with the front yard setback or the driveway to me. I’m having looked at other cases in this area as well I’m really pleased with the side yard setbacks. We’ve approved some things that are like you know reach out and you know hand your neighbor a razor or something so I think that’s pretty good. But the only, you know the biggest thing is just not changing that lot coverage at all. That’s disappointing to me. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 12 Madsen: I do have a concern about the length of the drive. Although it sounds like it might work for the purpose intended for this homeowner, maybe a future homeowner would have larger vehicles and with the limited space on the road I just think it’s important that you know that there is places in the driveway for guests and people to park their cars. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Yeah I concur with Nancy with her comments about the parking. I think that is going to be a long term problem. The comment was made about a lot of the homeowners in the neighborhood have 2 car garages. With the current as proposed design eliminating one car would not solve the problem. Even if you had a 2 car garage because you’re not going to get, it’s a depth issue. Not a width issue because as Steve noted we’ve got you know better side lot than we’ve had in some other situations here so it’s a, it’s purely a depth issue and you can’t go closer to the lake so I think it’s a difficult site and a difficult neighborhood to build in and unfortunately most new construction is maximizing everything and that’s, goes with I guess today’s construction and design so I think it’s a problem and I don’t know how it could be resolved without redesigning the house and shrinking the depth of the house to get the setbacks because he’s really maximized every inch that’s available which is unfortunate in this case. But I still regarding construction I think it needs to be properly, and I don’t know if the City signs it or if the contractors has to sign it during construction. Is that a City signage for parking? Or do they have to request. Aanenson: It can be. It’s also managed through building inspections and the fire chief which we’ve done up there. Had the fire truck come up and. Tietz: And so it would be the full length in this neighborhood, both out to the point and beyond. Aanenson: We’ll have to look at that to see how that works. I mean also making sure, to say that we can guarantee they’re going to park on his property off site but they’re going to have to find somewhere that it’s passable during construction. Tietz: Controlling subcontractors, you know construction and trucks is really an issue. Aanenson: Yes. Tietz: I don’t know if any of you, if any of you have followed the construction of Marty Davis’ home on Lake Minnetonka. He actually had to buy a lot down by Howards Point Marina and shuttled people back and forth because they had such a congested issue with parking down in that neighborhood. Obviously that’s not something we can do here but it’s only because this neighborhood is so constricted and we just have to be very cognizant of, and respecting all the neighbors. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 13 Aller: Well I’ll entertain a motion at this time if someone would like to make one. Either as is or modified as you see fit. Weick: I’ll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Weick. Weick: Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves an 11 ½ foot front yard setback, a 22.1 foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance, subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Randall: I second. Aller: Thank you Commissioner Randall. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? I will say that this area is so unique. The plots are so unique that it’s not surprising that we’re here doing this. The property is non-conforming and as much as I don’t hear that it is the best, it seems like it is a fair trade off which would allow for the homeowner to maximize the use and benefit of their property as situated and I think based on the, again the side lots and the setbacks that we do have, the buffer that is there and the concern that’s been placed in the report already for purposes of the lake, and I am very concerned about the lake and that’s why I was following up with those questions but I think that’s about as good as we’re going to get with the, with new construction unless we would deny it so I, because I think that it’s a fair and proper use of the property I’ll be voting for it. Any other discussion or comment? Weick moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves an 11.5 foot front yard setback, a 22.1 foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance, subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. A title search for the property should be conducted to ensure any/all existing easements are documented. 3. A new 1”=20’ scale survey should be provided as part of the building permit application clearly showing the proposed setbacks and lot coverage for the proposed house and structures. 4. At least one tree must be planted in the front yard, if one is not present after construction. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 14 5. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits across the entire south side. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities beyond those indicated in the tree removal plan shall be replaced. 6. No equipment may be stored within the tree protection area. 7. Appropriate tree protection measures must be taken to protect the rear yard ash from Emerald Ash Borer. 8. The 162 square foot rear patio area is understood to be the property’s water oriented structure. 9. Lot coverage may not exceed 3,319 square feet. 10. The proposed rear patio and driveway areas must be constructed using pervious paver systems. 11. A permanent 20 foot native vegetated buffer must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype with permanent buffer monuments. The buffer may work around the path and stairs. The buffer must be designed and installed by an experienced professional in native shoreline restoration. Design plan must be approved by the Water Resource Coordinator. 12. The property owner must work with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to identify and implement any shoreline restoration projects that would improve ecosystem health and function. Replace riprap with bioengineering solutions is one example. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: 7052 MINNEWASHTA PARKWAY – VARIANCES INCLUDING FRONT YARD SETBACK, WETLAND BUFFER SETBACK AND WETLAND BUFFER WIDTH. Aller: Again we’ll be sitting as a Board of Appeals and Adjustments concerning variances. Generous: Good evening Chairman Aller, commissioners. Aller: Can everybody hear? Let’s wait 30 seconds while it clears out. Thank you. Generous: Yes tonight we have a public hearing for Planning Case 2017-19 for 7052 Minnewashta Parkway. It’s a variance request. This property is located on the southwest corner of Minnewashta Parkway and Kings Road. The applicant is Nathan Kirt and the property owner Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 15 is Daryl Kirt, his father. The variance request is for the wetland setbacks. Initially we thought that we may look at a front yard setback variance but we believe that we’ve come up with an alternative that would not force him any closer to the road and provides an acceptable building envelope. Additionally the property, or the applicant did not want to go any closer to the road so. Again this property is on the southwest corner of Minnewashta Parkway and Kings Road. The property is zoned single family residential, RSF. It’s a total area of 6.27 acres, however the majority of that is in wetland and some of that is in actually in shore, and lakeshore area. Lake St. Joe. Setbacks are 30 feet from both Minnewashta Parkway and Kinds Road but the 10 foot setback on the west side of the property. However there’s a wetland that wraps around the building envelope on this site. It’s an outstanding, classified as an outstanding wetland on the back part of this property adjacent to Lake St. Joe which requires a total 100 foot building setback from that. 50 feet of that is buffer area and 50 feet is a wetland buffer setback. Maximum hard cover is 25 percent. When we pulled up our GIS system we looked at the site and it showed us that there’s a wetland on the property. It was never delineated for city purposes. However this is a little warning for the city that we look at the property to see that, make sure that it complies with all our ordinance requirements. The property is guided for residential low density use and that’s typically that means a single family detached housing with a 2 car garage. It’s guided for residential low density use so it was anticipated that this would develop for a single family home. I should note that we began working on this project at the end of 2016 and so we’ve been working with the property owner and the applicant to come up with all the information we needed so we can get an informed decision and have all the information before you. When we originally sent this out for jurisdictional review, both the DNR and the watershed district, Minnehaha Creek were concerned that the submitted survey was inaccurate. They believed that the ordinary high water elevation for Lake St. Joe was actually closer to the property and closer to that wetland edge so the applicant had his surveyor meet out with a representative from DNR and they came up and agreed to this is the closest that the OHW of the lake came to the home. So it’s over 240 feet so it exceeded the minimum requirement for the shoreland setback so there’s no variances involved in that. The OHW for Lake St. Joe is 945.2 so. The applicant’s proposal was to construct a 28 by 90 foot house on the property, maintain a 20 foot wetland buffer and then there was an 18.2 foot wetland setback from, for the closest from the house to the edge of the wetland. We agreed with the property owner that, I should go back. In 1989 the City did approve a 50 foot wetland setback variance for this property and the applicant began construction on the house on the site and then abandoned that and so the original variance has been voided and it’s no longer in effect. We do believe that there is a necessity for a variance to permit the development of this site. We’ve calculated the building envelope of the property with the required setback and it creates a 30 by 10 foot piece of buildable area right adjacent to the front yard setback. That, as we all know would not even accommodate a driveway in our circumstances. So we believe wrapping some type of variance was necessary. And then as part of our review and our reason for changing from the 1989 variance approval to now, I’ll have Vanessa explain our reasoning on that. Strong: Thank you. So it is always a challenge to balance the needs of an applicant with the needs of the community and also the protection and preservation of our local water resources. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 16 As Bob mentioned we spent a good 4 months, since I’ve been here, really trying to work with the applicant to come up with something that is achievable and that balance and it has been hard. They had to walk through the Wetland Conservation Act process. The Board of Water and Soil Resources. The Minnehaha Creek watershed district. The DNR have all had eyes turned towards this and raised several questions on this property. So it’s important to understand that. Our recommendation tries to consider very, very many factors here. Primarily though I’ll break those into 4 categories. First of all is the site history. The current proposed buffer and setback from staff takes into consideration the historic use of the property. The applicant provided a lot of really great historical information on the site. We’ve looked at how the neighboring area has also developed and what current rules and regulations are for this area. That’s what we took all that into consideration. That’s one factor. Other agencies. So again like I said, many other agencies have a lot of concerns about this. Not only is it important that our city variances meet the requirements of our own variance necessities but also those of other regulatory agencies. So both the DNR and Minnehaha Creek watershed district also have variance requirements and we need to meet those and be sensitive to those as well. So the third factor here is wetland type, health and function. This is considered a preserve wetland. This is our highest quality and category of wetland. The vegetated uplands, the buffer areas between wetlands and the, the vegetated uplands between the wetland edge and the upland area is one of our most diverse eco habitat. That’s considered like our richest zones for aquatic organisms and semi-aquatic organisms. In Chanhassen we take these under the highest protection. These types of wetlands so this is not a standard wetland. This is our preserve wetlands. These are the ones that are paramount for protecting both the quality of Lake St. Joe but also Lake Minnewashta and all the surrounding sub-watersheds so this is something we take very seriously in protecting this specific wetland. That being said, the width of wetland buffers does matter. Wetland buffers less than 50 feet do have significantly reduced function. That’s why the minimum wetland buffer here is 50 feet so any variance that we’re granting, and we acknowledge we need to grant something, is going to reduce the effectiveness of that buffer so we need to try to create the widest buffer possible but still allow reasonable use in order to protect both the lake and that wetland so. The last piece is of course again community input. So again you know this is a parcel that has an intended use but there are also neighboring parcels and neighboring residents that have concerns about the quality of Lake St. Joe and the quality of Lake Minnewashta because they are hydrologically connected. And Chanhassen residents overall rank wetlands very high in their importance for this community. A lot of residents live here because of that. Our public outreach survey, I don’t know if you guys paid attention to that but they ranked wetlands as very high. It’s in our top 5 of important values for the citizens of Chanhassen so protecting those is important for the entire community. So we had to take all four of those and balance those to come up with our recommendation and that’s where we came up with the 40 foot buffer and 30 foot setback. Generous: And back to me. So we believe our amended variance provides the applicant with reasonable opportunity to develop this property. It doesn’t specifically meet his submitted housing plan but it covers a lot of it and provides an opportunity for him to build reasonably in this area. In determining this we also looked at housing within the area. We looked at all the Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 17 houses on Kings Road and those on Country Oaks Boulevard and the average dimension of those homes were 56.2 feet in depth and 66.3 feet wide. That would all easily fit within this building envelope that we show on this. The 40 foot buffer does, as Vanessa stated, provide an environmental safety for the water quality and the wetland and the lake and then the 20 foot setback also allows a reasonable building envelope but we’re also saying that they can have within the first 10 feet of that 20 feet they could have their accessory structure so if they wanted a patio or a deck they would be able to create an outdoor living space in conjunction with the building of the structure on site. So staff is, does believe that this is a reasonable alternative and it gives them a reasonable use of the property. It accommodates most, as a matter of fact this point is the same as what their original plan concept was, to put the house across this area. It’s just to the west and south where they had encroached into the wetland that we were looking at. So staff is recommending approval of amended 10 foot wetland buffer variance so a 40 foot wetland buffer and a 30 foot wetland buffer setback variance so a 20 foot setback so they are allowed to construct the single family home on the site and a garage. However also preserving the natural features on the property subject to the conditions of the report which basically say provide us with the grading, drainage, erosion control plan as part of your building permit application and if you impact any of the wetlands buffer that it will be revegetated to acceptable standards and we recommend adoption of the Findings of Fact and Decision. With that I’d be happy to answer any questions. Aller: Thank you. I have two questions. One, first for Ms. Strong. The conjunction of the wetland requirements. The buffer and the setback requirement. Does it give us a de facto 50 foot setback if they’re not using that additional 10 because of the, I should say buffer because we’re using the setback partially it’s co-existing non-buildable use? Strong: That’s a very good question. These are not, these are not exchangeable requirements. A setback from a buffer and a buffer itself are two different things. We actually redesigned a diagram, it’s actually in your packet here. This one here, to kind of explain the difference between the buffer and the setback. The buffer itself is what’s protecting the wetland. The setback is something that municipalities use or regulatory agencies use for development. It allows somebody to use the space around a structure. But it is the buffer itself so no, they’re not de facto the same. It is a 40 foot versus a 50 foot buffer. Aller: Okay. And then have we looked at the impact of potentially what would happen if we moved the physical housing unit away from the buffer and created smaller side and corner setbacks and whether or not that would create perhaps a sight line hazard or what that impact might be? Generous: Not specifically a sight line. We were never concerned with that because the corner of the property has a 50 by 50 easement area that they can’t build in and so they’re, our sight line is 30 feet back so they’re way out of that. That wasn’t an issue. It’s can he fit a house in this. Yes, we believe so. We’ve seen lots of building plans come through that would fit within that envelope and provide exterior spacing. You know he could look at if he doesn’t want to do a 4 Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 18 car wide garage, what if he did a 3 car wide would probably fit in there, or 2 car with a double deep garage would fit within that envelope. Aller: Alright. But my, and my question goes to the ability to increase the buffer and put a physical structure on that’s sufficient for common housing. Generous: Yes if you went farther north you could theoretically do that. Give them a 10 foot variance for the front yard setback and then add that to the rear. Again that area gets a little wider the farther north you get so. Aller: Right. Generous: However it also goes against what their preference is to stay away from Kings Road as much as possible. They want it to be even farther back and we’re saying well maybe you could move up to the building setback line. Aller: Okay. Any additional questions at this point? Hearing none if the applicant would like to come forward and make a presentation that would be great. If you could state your name and address and representational capacity if any. Daryl Kirt: My name is Daryl Kirt and I’ve owned the land for about 30 years. In fact we were at this very same meeting 30 years ago when our first house was approved and. Aller: Well I wasn’t there so welcome. Daryl Kirt: We’ve got 30 years of history. Some of these people only have a couple years history on the land. I’ll just start out by saying first of all everything, the buffers and everything are assume that the Lake St. Joe is an environmental lake rather than recreational lake. Now I’ve asked Mr. Generous to explain the difference. I’ve never got an answer so I’ve done some homework which we’ll bring up later. If it’s a recreational lake Vanessa then these would change I guess am I correct? Strong: At this time no. Daryl Kirt: We’ll start out with that but I appreciate everybody being here and I see one guy’s missing. I take that as a yes vote so I’m going forward with a lot of confidence here. Aller: Well without one here we still have a quorum so we’ll have a vote. Daryl Kirt: Okay. So I’m going to, if I could if I could just go through what you all have in front of you. Aller: That’d be great. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 19 Daryl Kirt: And like I said there’s a lot of history so I numbered it. If you go to page 2. It talks about when they approved the Oaks development there and I had my land before of course that happened but when they did that they approved 35 acres went into homes and development and along with that came a holding pond so, right next to our land. We took on all the water from the Oaks project and probably even further up and the pollution that’s in, the runoff of the city. Not the city sewers but the city’s storm water, and Vanessa’s very familiar with that right? Like I brought the book but all the chemicals and the salt and all that is running down to the same wetland that we’re saying is protected, and I agree with it. Is protected but I’m saying there’s two standards here so do their development and they’re getting 35 acres plus probably some more of this going into my land down there and also to Sue Morgan’s land, which wasn’t mentioned in this and that’s going into the same exact wetland that I agree is protected exactly what he read. Okay. So then going onto page 3 we were here to do this house, and we did. We went through everything. We paid all the fees. We hired a contractor when we bought the land. We knew there’d be some challenges so we hired Braun and Carlson Engineering to do soil borings so we had to go through all the soil bores and the City agreed with our locations. We did the soil bores. We found bedrock so we had to take out the soil that was there. Remove it. Put in new soil. Compact it. It had to be inspected by Itasca Engineer. We did all this here. It cost thousands of dollars to do that and they agreed to this location and the size of our house. The footprint is there. The contractor was supposed to have it done during the summer. He didn’t. He got into winter. It got frost. We ended up going to court. We sued him. Judge Mackey, District Court rules in our favor. We got a judgment for $60,000 but we all know what it’s like to collect from contractors. They’re up and gone so we have a footprint on that land. Our compacted pad is there and is existing so if we’re allowed to go back to the same footprint that we did 30 years ago that was approved we won’t have to do anything as far as a new pad. And working for a year and a half on this and they’ll go through that later too. We were told we can do it over here. Then we can do it over there. There’s a lot of expenses involved in doing this. We bought the land. I didn’t zone it as residential. The city did. They agreed this would be a buildable lot. We believed in it. We did it. We did our part. We paid our dues. We did our pad. It didn’t work. It wasn’t our fault so now I’ve been trying to sell it ever since this happened for 30 years I’ve tried to sell this land and when I put it up for sale I’d run ads in the paper. I had a realtor sell it and the potential buyers would call the City and ask is it a buildable lot. We’ve had a lot of negative comments came from the City. Well that’s the land that the house sunk on. In the first meeting I had with Mr. Generous when I went to get the paperwork he couldn’t find it. It took him 30 minutes and found it in the archives in the basement and he came out of the basement with this little smile on his face. Oh that’s the land where the house sunk. Well the house didn’t sink. The contractor made the error and the error was there’s frost and the pad is still there and we removed. It wasn’t a house. It was just 3 walls of cement was removed so I, we built the house that I live in at 50 Hill Street and I’ve lived there for 30 years. I’m almost 70 years old. I’ve got this piece of land. I want it to go away and my, we had a family meeting. The children said the only way this is going to go away is if we get a permit. We build on it. If we like living there we will. But it gets rid of the problem with a piece of land I’ve had for 30 years so that’s kind of the history of how it, it just didn’t build a house that didn’t work. This Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 20 was a lot of money spent and a lot of time. So, and then they mentioned, Mr. Generous mentioned the lift station. The easement. In your packet you’ll see it’s not 50 by 50. It says when they started out they had 40 by 40. When it was completion the easement’s 20 by 20 so that’s not correct what he said there so now I’ve got the land. I’m trying to sell it. Nothing’s happening. About 15 years ago I started seeing big puddles of water show up on my land. I’d say what is this coming from so I have a restoration shop. We do antique cars. In the wintertime I drive by it on the way to work. I find a city truck. It’s got the big vacuum cleaner. It cleans out storm sewers dumping that water on my land. I called Channel 9 News. Channel 9 News comes out and the City worker said he didn’t do it and they said well we’re going to take a sample of this water and the guy admitted that he did it. It was 3 days on Channel 9 News top story. Kirt property polluted with city storm water so this is what’s happening to me on that lot so I’ll keep going here. I’m getting excited here so it’s been a long 30 years. So then we go down to like I say, the sewer. The lift station. May of 2017. Now I don’t know if anyone from the City is aware of this. The line broke on that. Mr. Generous are you aware of that? Aller: Okay so I’m just going to try to refocus on the issue which is whether or not we should give a variance on the setbacks and allow for the building. Daryl Kirt: Well I guess this will make sense as I go through it. Aller: Okay can we, I guess what impact would that have on whether or not there’s a setback or not? Daryl Kirt: I’ll tell you in 2 seconds here. Aller: Okay. Daryl Kirt: The storm sewer in 2007, the lift station, the pipe broke to it. It flooded my property with sewage. Raw sewage and I don’t want to be pushed closer to that lift station. I want to be farther away from, exactly where we were before and how did the City clean it up? Are you aware that that pipe broke? Aanenson: We’re not in charge of sewers so I’m sorry I can’t answer that question. Daryl Kirt: What’s that? Aanenson: The planning department isn’t in charge of sewer so we can’t answer that question. Daryl Kirt: Okay, so it broke. It’s obviously broke and you know how it was cleaned up? They came through and opened up the fire hydrant and washed the sewage. It ran to the south and onto my property. The same wetland that we’re, that I agree should be protected too. That’s how they cleaned it. So I mean I’ve got, it just goes on. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 21 Aller: So I guess my question is with regards to the wetland it sounds like you want to protect the wetland. Why should we grant a variance for the buffer setback? Daryl Kirt: Because I’m going to show that I don’t feel the lake is, I think the lake is recreational and as we go further, then after that the City came to me and asked for a holding pond and they took a half acre of my land and put it in the exact same wetland that we’re talking about right here. You now have a half acre they took from me as a holding pond and that holding pond is taking all the runoff to the north coming into that wetland also going into Lake St. Joe so now there’s 2 holding ponds on an 18 acre lake and there’s a third holding pond by the public access and a definition of a lake, this environmental can’t have more than a house every mile or so. I counted, there’s 13 houses just on the north side alone and those houses, I don’t think Mr. Generous looked at them but they’re gigantic and the average is 3 to 4 car garage on every one of them that have lakeshore on Lake St. Joe. So by taking Lake St. Joe, we’ve got to make a decision. Is it or is not recreational and it might take a judge to do, I don’t know but that’s my point. Aller: Okay. Nathan Kirt: And I think Daryl, that’s my dad here. He felt the way this is written it kind of makes it look like we don’t care about the lake but we really do. We are conservationists. We love the lake. That’s why we want to be there and we do want to protect the lake. Aller: Right. Nathan Kirt: We don’t, we don’t feel that this variance would be very detrimental to the lake. And I want to live by a lake that has natural surroundings. We love wildlife. We love trees. I’ve already been out planting trees. Removing buckthorn and I know my dad may seem a little upset. He has had 30 years on there. Aller: Sure. Nathan Kirt: And feels he has had a little bit of abuse. Maybe a two sided story were we have storm water coming on both ends of his property. It was full of salt, debris, all kinds of pollution. I mean he just looks for, he’s just asking for a little variance, or I am, we are and we get shut down and acted like we want to go in there and develop a golf course or a 7-11 or something. We love that land. We love that property but we don’t want to be pushed on top of a sewage or a lift station that’s been leaking and stuff like that. But we don’t want to hurt a lake either. I don’t think we would at all doing what we’ve asked to do. Daryl Kirt: Yeah and we’re satisfied with the original, what the original plan was. The City, everyone approved it 30 years ago. The exact pad. My pad is there. We’re happy with that. Aller: Okay. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 22 Daryl Kirt: And we gave up some skin already. We gave a half acre of our land away already for one holding pond and with that half acre holding pond, it’s in writing in the contract that the City will maintain the level of the culvert where it goes from Lake Minnewashta, or from St. Joe to Minnewashta because when they did that they narrowed it and the beavers are plugging it up and you can see the water’s up, down, up, down and the City has not done their job as far as maintaining that as well and that caused some of the water to be higher and some of the problems in the wetland. So now we have 3 holding ponds in the same wetland that we’re talking about. Aller: Okay. Daryl Kirt: We have the City with a half acre they’re not maintaining. The beaver control problem. They keep saying they will when we call them. Yeah we’ll fix it. They haven’t. We’ve been going out there 2-3 times a day cleaning up beavers. Beaver dams that keeps the water level and we have the chart that shows. The DNR, we have the chart showing where that level is and how it goes up and down. Nathan Kirt: We’ve been working with the DNR monitoring the lake. Aller: Awesome. That was going to be a suggestion with animals and lakes, DNR is the place to be so, any additional comments? Nathan Kirt: I have a few. Aller: Sure. Nathan Kirt: If you have time. Aller: Yep. Nathan Kirt: You guys have read through the agenda and it says on here the DNR assisted with an on site survey and have concerns. It also says the Minnehaha Watershed had concerns. I’ve spoken with both of them and the Minnehaha Watershed said that they were good with everything and they appreciated me calling and talking with them. The DNR that I met with on the lake, or on land, the only 2 spots where she wanted to add 2 more elevations. The only elevation she took were city elevations. One of a culvert and one of their holding pond. They weren’t issues with us at all. Aller: Okay. Nathan Kirt: And it’s written to make it sound like we had problems with the DNR. I don’t know why it’s written like that. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 23 Aller: I think it’s interpretation. I didn’t take it that way so it really depends on your viewpoint when you read them so thank you for clarifying that. Nathan Kirt: …of these agencies have expressed concern over the development of the parcel so it makes me, but I just want to clarify that. Aller: Great. Nathan Kirt: We’ve worked with them and it went good. I enjoyed speaking with the DNR and Minnehaha Watershed. And one other thing I want to just bring up was, we’ve been doing this for a little while and if I could read a little paragraph here when they gave us a buffer of 25 feet and that was about 2 months ago and now last Thursday, that’s the first I’ve seen this agenda and it shows a 40 foot buffer now so I’ve had no working days basically. This was on Thursday evening right through New Year’s and to now. Staff has no authority to approve a building permit for this property without a wetland buffer. Staff reached out to the agencies with jurisdictional authority over this property. Minnehaha Watershed District on 10/23/2017 to determine any additional compromise for a minimum wetland buffer width that could be supported by staff and the watershed district. Staff was able to work with the watershed district to reach a minimum buffer width of 25 feet. Then when I get this agenda it says 40 feet. I guess not long ago. Aller: Okay. Nathan Kirt: So this agenda caught us by surprise and we’ve been working with staff for a long time. Thought we had gotten somewhere. Aller: Great. Thanks for pointing that out. Nathan Kirt: I appreciate you listening. Thank you very much. Aller: Thank you. Any additional questions of staff at this time? Do you want to address the 25 foot buffer versus the 45, or 40 foot buffer please? Strong: Yeah sure I can, and I can understand his confusion. Part of that is just timeline. He read it, as I wrote it correctly. That was back in October and as you’ve noticed there’s been a lot of different agencies involved and a lot of different times. It is true that the DNR, as we’ve been working with them and the watershed district, have been working with them, have supported the work that we’re trying to do with this and their concerns are not that it not get developed, and so I do apologize for that. It’s just how it gets developed. So the timeline between when that was written. After that the DNR came back and had their additional concerns about the setback of the lake and where the lake level actually was. I’ve attached in your packet communication emails from the DNR that were dated actually after that which are in the end of November and the last comment we have from the DNR as far as an email that I attached was they do want to Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 24 make sure that they see the storm water analysis when it’s ready and that again they just continue to be concerned that the size of the buffer is sufficient and that is what inspired and led to us widening a buffer from 25 feet to 40 feet. Again the DNR has variance requirements. The watershed district has variance requirements. We could grant a 25 foot variance. What I was looking for was something that would not trigger an appeal from another agency right off the bat. That being said all the agencies through my conversations support what we are proposing and they’re most comfortable with what we are proposing. And that’s where we are at now. She he’s right. At that time that’s where we were at but since then the DNR continued to be concerned through November and that’s what kind of led to the 40 foot but. Aller: Thank you. Nathan Kirt: Would I be able to speak just real quick? Is that alright? Aller: Sure, real quick. Nathan Kirt: Because she did email me back just afterwards and she says thanks Nate. I think this looks good. That was the new, with 2 more elevations put on it. I forwarded it to Bob and the City with a note and I believe the survey is accurate. I’ve never been given anything from the DNR saying that they thought anything should be changed and when I talked to them they said it was up to the City. She said this isn’t my job. I don’t make this buffer and we’re, how many feet back are we from the shoreline? It’s like 300 or 200 feet. We’re a long ways from the shoreline. Much, much further than most other houses in the area. Aller: Great thank you. And just to clarify the shoreline setback and the wetland setback are two different items. Strong: Yes, so again we’re talking about two different things and I think that is also one of the difficulties in working with the DNR. We work with both the shoreline and the wetland and they’re almost two separate things, even though in this case they are connected. So in fact in this case when he asked the question as to whether or not it was a recreational lake or a natural system lake, the reason why at that point I said it wouldn’t be relevant is because the buffer is based upon the wetland and not the lake. The DNR is actually the one that sets the status and the type of the lake so whether it’s recreational or natural system that would be up to the DNR. Could that be relevant for the lake? Maybe it is a different one. That I won’t contest. You might have to discuss with the DNR. What my point was simply that the buffer is based actually on the wetland and this is a preserve class wetland so that’s where that came from. Aller: Thank you. Okay, Commissioner Randall. Randall: So…the Kirt’s questions at all or? Aller: Yes, yes. We haven’t opened the public hearing yet. Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 25 Randall: Just real quick I want, did you, will this be buildable for you this 10 foot wetland buffer variance with the 30 foot wetland buffer setback? Daryl Kirt: This one… Generous: And this is the City’s we had the 40 foot buffer in there. This is his request with the 20 foot buffer and an 18.2 foot. Randall: Alright. Nathan Kirt: The one with the City wouldn’t, I’d have to redesign the house and I’d have to wrap this house around a septic system. A lift station. And it wouldn’t be using our building pad. The building pad is where this is now. Randall: Okay. Nathan Kirt: And where they push us off would be, would not be a building pad. Aller: Everybody good? We’ll open up the public hearing portion of this item so anyone wishing to come forward can speak either for or against the item before us and we’ll try to have any questions answered as you probably will be enlightening us on new issues. Sue Morgan: Hello, my name is Sue Morgan. I live at 4031 Kings Road and it’s the large property right there. Aller: Welcome. Sue Morgan: Linda Scott and I have lived there, well we’ve owned the property since 1985 so we’ve seen a lot happen around Lake St. Joe and we’ve watched as Daryl’s property has gone through a lot of changes over the years and you know it’s, just to give you some perspective. I give Daryl a lot of credit for putting up with what the City has put him through. For what the City has put his property through. We act as kind of guardians of the lake. We do the Secchi readings and clarity readings, things like that and send them into the Met Council so we kind of watch the quality of the lake and the levels of the lake and we have a dock there and Scotty has fought the battle of the beavers. The water levels go up. Go down. Go up. Go down. We’ve called the City how many times to ask the City’s help in getting rid of the beaver. Getting promises made. Promises broken. Watching the water level go up and down. Watching Daryl’s property be flooded with storm water and I hope that the City will enable Daryl and his son to build the house on their property. They’ve been through 30 years of a lot and I think that, I don’t know what the problem is with this property. How the City sees the property but I know they don’t see a lot of value in Lake St. Joe. I feel that they don’t see the value in Lake St. Joe because it’s so small. I know the DNR owns the access. Very seldom do they build up the Chanhassen Planning Commission – January 2, 2018 26 access. It’s difficult for people to get their boats in and out. We’ve called the City again about the beaver. They do nothing about the culvert. Right now there’s a pile of debris on each of the culvert that feeds Lake Minnewashta that’s taller than I am because the Kirt’s and Scotty and Mark all clean out the beaver dam so if the City does enable the Kirt’s to build the property on this. Build their house on this property, I hope they then support the effort to maintain the lake. To clean the lake. To watch the storm water runoff. Because you know both the DNR and City say that they value it and the wetland setbacks are important but then again as Daryl said they do nothing to support that effort so you know there’s going to be parameters put around them to build their house a certain way and a certain piece of land in order to honor the wetland setbacks. But at the same time the City, the DNR need to do something to help maintain the lake as well so it’s just a perspective on what’s fair for everybody. You know it’s not always the DNR and the City that get their way. The property owner has owned this property for 30 years and I think that you know we, when we built our property got variances for things and I think that you know in seeing the people in Red Cedar Point that got variances to build their home, I think it’s within the City’s wherewithal to try to make this happen. After 30 years it should happen and I don’t know what else to say other than I hope it does. I wish you luck. Aller: Thank you. Any additional comments? Seeing no one come forward we’ll close the public hearing at this point in time and we’ll open it up for discussion. Anyone wish to open up? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I just have a question about the responsibility to clean up the culvert area. The beaver house area. Is that the City? Is that the DNR? Is that something that could be addressed and improved upon going forward? Strong: I’ll answer part and then I’ll let Paul answer it. Being new to the City I don’t have that much history. I will say it’s always interesting from my perspective that I look at these resources, again being new to the City and most people anywhere want to live next to these for the wildlife and yet the wildlife is something they want us to manage more and control more and they’re a problem and so I’m always struggling with how to balance the beaver, which that’s not there. Again this is just my perspective. That doesn’t make it your’s or anybody else’s. And so for me beaver management is not what we’re responsible for doing. We’re responsible for making sure the beaver has a place to live. That being said does the DNR have beaver management programs? Absolutely, and I do not know what the history is of the City and what the City has promised for that type of thing but I can tell you from a water resources perspective it’s usually to let the wildlife be there because that’s what that area is for and it’s usually why people want to live in a place like that. They provide critical ecosystem function so I’ll answer that part. Paul maybe you know a bit more CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Receive Planning Commission Minutes dated January 16, 2018 Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.4. Prepared By Nann Opheim, City Recorder File No: N/A PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council receives the Planning Commission Minutes dated January 16, 2018." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. ATTACHMENTS: Summary Minutes Verbatim Minutes CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JANUARY 16, 2018 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad, Steve Weick STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and MacKenzie Walters, Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Rick & Liz Nustad 7721 Erie Avenue OLD BUSINESS: 7721 ERIE AVENUE – VARIANCE TO BUILD A GARAGE. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. Chairman Aller asked for an update on the vacation process. The applicants, Rick and Liz Nustad reviewed details of the changes made to their request. After comments from commission members the following motion was made. Randall moved, Tietz seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 10 foot west front yard setback, a 5 foot rear yard setback, a 9 percent lot coverage and a second driveway access variance for construction of a detached garage subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decisions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. The garage must be architecturally compatible with existing house and match color. 3. Vacation of southern alley must be completed before the building permit application is submitted. 4. The second driveway shall be constructed using a pervious paver/geogrid system, the design of which shall be approved by the Water Resource Coordinator. The system must be installed by a certified installer. Planning Commission Summary – January 16, 2018 2 5. The applicant shall construct an 8 foot in diameter rain garden in the southeast corner of the property, the design and installation of which shall be approved by the Water Resource Coordinator. 6. The property’s lot cover may not exceed 3,066 square feet, of which no more than 2,786 square feet may be impervious surface. All voted in favor, except Commissioner Madsen who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 1651 MOTORPLEX COURT – REGISTERED LAND SURVEY (SUBDIVISION). Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. The applicant Richard LaMettry, explained this request is for the benefit of recording and transferring wetlands to the City of Chanhassen. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit (#2015-19) for development within the Bluff Creek Corridor and the Registered Land Survey creating three parcels, subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Conditional Use Permit: 1. Development must comply with the Bluff Creek Corridor regulations. 2. Tract A shall be dedicated to the City. Subdivision: 1. Provide the City of Chanhassen with a copy of the current access and maintenance agreement for Motorplex Court. 2. Access to Tract A shall be included as part of the current access and maintenance agreement for Motorplex Court. 3. Identify and provide a Drainage and Utility easement over the publicly owned piping on the site. 4. Dedicate Tract A to the City of Chanhassen. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Planning Commission Summary – January 16, 2018 3 PUBLIC HEARING: 7700 QUATTRO DRIVE – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO EXTEND COMMUNICATION TOWER. Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item. Speaking on behalf of Crown Castle Services, Richard Krueger explained the reason for the amendment to the conditional use permit. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of an amendment to Conditional Use Permit #2000-6 to permit the construction of an extension to the communication tower up to 90 feet monopole, plans prepared by Design 1, dated revised 04-10-17, and subject to the following conditions and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: 1. A building permit is required to construct the platform and tower extension; the tower must be designed for a 90 MPH wind load and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice. 2. The original plans must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. The contractor shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 4. The applicant shall submit a detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan for staff review and approval. 5. The tower extension shall be of the same color as the existing tower. 6. A letter of intent committing the tower owner and his or her successors to allow the shared use of the tower if an additional user agrees in writing to meet reasonable terms and conditions for shared use shall be submitted to the City. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: 7555 WALNUT CURVE – VARIANCE TO BUILD A POOL. MacKenzie Walters presented the staff report on this item. Commissioner Madsen asked if there had been discussion of reducing the lot coverage by removing the shed and/or deck. The applicants Nick and Jessica Hansgen discussed their design plans for the pool and landscaping to Planning Commission Summary – January 16, 2018 4 help address runoff issues. Chairman Aller opened the public hearing. No one spoke and the public hearing was closed. Tietz moved, Madsen seconded that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 4.9 percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decisions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Lot coverage may not exceed 4,266 square feet. 3. A low berm must be constructed in the southeast corner of the lot as depicted in Attachment 6: WRC Required Berm. 4. The applicant must purchase and install a fourth rain barrel. 5. A rain garden must be installed in the southwest corner of the property. The design of the rain garden and installation must be verified by the City’s Water Resources Coordinator. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Madsen noted the Summary and Verbatim Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 2, 2018. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Kate Aanenson provided an update on action taken by the City Council at their January 8, 2018 meeting. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Commissioner Randall moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 16, 2018 Chairman Aller called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Aller, Nancy Madsen, John Tietz, and Mark Randall MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Undestad, Steve Weick STAFF PRESENT: Kate Aanenson, Community Development Director; Bob Generous, Senior Planner; and MacKenzie Walters, Planner PUBLIC PRESENT: Rick & Liz Nustad 7721 Erie Avenue OLD BUSINESS: 7721 ERIE AVENUE – VARIANCE TO BUILD A GARAGE. Walters: Thank you. This item, case 2017-20 was first heard on November 21, 2017. If appealed it would go before the City Council on February 12, 2018. This is the revised request for a garage at 7721 Erie Avenue. This is a variance request for a second driveway access, a 10 foot west front yard setback, a 5 foot rear setback and a 9 percent lot coverage variance. So just to recap the November 21st meeting, the Planning Commission requested that the applicant attempt to minimize the lot coverage associated with the variance. That they work with the Water Resource Coordinator to mitigate the impact of the proposed lot coverage. That the applicant pursue the vacation of the southern alley and that the applicant investigate the potential for using a single driveway access. The applicant worked with staff over the next month or so and came back with an attached, a proposal for an attached garage configuration which reduces the hard cover. Proposes using geogrid for the second driveway access which would reduce the amount of impervious surface. They are proposing an 8 foot in diameter rain garden to help mitigate the runoff generated by the increased hard cover and they are working with the engineering department to vacate the southern alleyway. They did talk to their builder and they do not believe it would be feasible to use a single driveway access just given how long the fire truck is and how tight the garage space is. So the location is the same as before. It’s still zoned residential single family. Site conditions are currently as they were. The property has 28.3 percent lot coverage. The lot is 8,529 square feet. The north setback is met and the existing setback for the front is 20 feet and there is the shed to the south that is within the south setback and rear yard setback. The applicant has taken, as I mentioned, every step they could to minimize the extent of variance required to house a fire truck. I decided to put two side by side here so you can see the difference between the initial and the revised proposal. I mentioned that they’ll be using a pervious paver driveway with geogrid instead of a concrete driveway. The Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 2 house as you can see has been moved up which removes about 100 square feet of impervious patio and then the rain garden would be located here and this green area is the about 460 square feet of lot area that would be added by vacating the alley to the south. And of course adding that extra 8 feet means they would no longer need a southern setback variance. This table shows the difference between the initial and revised proposal. The biggest difference is, are in terms of the lot coverage. The use of the vacation of the alleyway would reduce the lot coverage from the proposed 37.4 percent you saw on the 21st down to 34 percent and using pervious pavers for the driveway would reduce it to 30.9 percent impervious surface and as mentioned they are proposing the installation of a rain garden to help absorb as much of that runoff as possible. That being said it would still be a significant increase from the property’s current 28.3 percent lot coverage. Staff looking at it assessment is pretty similar. The neighborhood does have the history of street flooding. There is inadequate storm water treatment. The applicant does currently reasonable use of the property with a single family home, two car garage, patio, storage shed. Staff is still concerned about the precedent of allowing variances for the storage of large vehicles. That being said, as was mentioned, the applicant has made a good faith effort to address the Planning Commission’s comments and concerns. This certainly represents the minimum possible variance for storing the fire truck. Unfortunately because of concerns staff still recommends denial unless the Planning Commission feels the revised proposal has sufficiently addressed the concerns raised during the November 21st meeting. We do have a motion both for denial and approval prepared. I’d be happy to answer any questions you have at this time. Aller: Any questions at this time for staff? What’s the process that would need to be taken or is being undertaken to vacate that easement? Walters: Yep my understanding is they have applied for the vacation. I believe we got the, the one thing we were waiting on before we put a date on it was the Gopher One locates which they sent to us last week. I’m working, going to work with our engineering department to go over those but they are well on their way to vacating. There’s just a couple steps they would need to do and I believe it’s penciled in for a February date if we can get the Gopher One stuff taken care of, and again they did have the crew out there and it was marked so they are pursuing that and we don’t foresee any obstacles to that. Aller: And is there any, it’s not a requirement now but it could be made a requirement to this variance that that be done in order for the variance to move forward correct? Walters: It is currently listed as a condition for approval that before a building permit be issued the vacation be completed. Aller: Okay. Any additional questions based on that? Tietz: No. Looks like a good solution. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 3 Aller: Alright. We’ll go ahead and have the applicant come forward. If you could state your names and address for the record again that would be great. Rick Nustad: It’s Rick and Liz Nustad, 7721 Erie Avenue, Chanhassen. Aller: Welcome again. Liz Nustad: Thank you. Rick Nustad: We are the owners. Anyways just an update. We met with Terry Jeffery from the Riley-Purgatory watershed district on December 7th. He came out and we walked the yard and he was pretty nonchalant about it. We have, the yard drains backward towards this alleyway and he said basically we could rototill up about an 8 foot diameter chunk of land where the shed would be moved. That would suffice and I asked him about rain barrels and he said unless you have, or he asked do you have a use for the water and I said no. Like a garden and he didn’t see any issues at all. He said he was going to contact someone at the City which may have been MacKenzie about so. And we made a work ticket for Gopher State on December 19th and they came out, bear with me here. I have here the completed sign off. Let’s see here, from Gopher State showing the only people that had to mark anything was CenturyLink. Everything else was no conflict and I’m pretty sure that the City was out and marked on this alleyway where I guess it’s a sewer that goes back there. So that was done. And we did file for the vacate and paid the fee. And we did come in with our geo pavers and turned in the spec sheet to MacKenzie so he could see that. We did want to show up tonight with a drawing of, street view of our house with the new attachment but Boyer Construction was unable to get that to us unfortunately. We did see a preliminary drawing and it does look very nice. And we do have the completed final drawing from our survey company. That does show the alleyway and there’s two, where they painted on the ground two lines from CenturyLink that actually go off to the south of us and that is really all we have. Aller: Great, thank you. Any questions of the applicant at this time? We’re all familiar with Mr. Jeffery. He’s a very accommodating individual and low key and did he happen to raise his eye brow at all? Rick Nustad: Eye brow, we missed. Aller: It’s a tell. Rick Nustad: But we do have a little better plan versus…8 foot diameter circle. He can come up with something. Aller: Sounds like it. Thank you very much. Rick Nustad: Thank you for your time. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 4 Liz Nustad: Yep, thank you. Aller: Okay, we don’t have a public hearing on this item as it’s old business. We’ve had a public hearing on a prior occasion. They were asked to work with the City and come up with a hopefully better solution and we have a plan before us so thoughts. Randall: I’m impressed that they did it. It looks nice that they went through and came up with a little bit better variance than what we had before so. Tietz: Yeah, I agree. I think it’s a great solution for the conditions and the situation that we reviewed the first time. I think it’s going to be, even though it is a larger garage than is normal I think under the conditions and in the neighborhood it works very well so thank you. Aller: Alright. Madsen: Although I appreciate all the extra work they’ve gone into I do have a concern that it would establish the precedent of needing a storage space for larger vehicles to justify exceeding the lot coverage so I still do have that concern. Tietz: Can you make a motion? Aller: Yeah, I can’t make a motion but I’ll invite a motion, whether it’s for or against modified. Randall: I’ll make it for. I just want to say one more thing. I really appreciate that they went through and worked with it on, that was nice you know so. They’ve followed a lot of our recommendations on it. The precedent obviously is an issue but at least they went back and made some changes there to help with it so that’s all. Tietz: Well and I recall we had positive comments from the neighbors the first time around so even though it is a little atypical there was not push back from the neighbors who spoke at the public hearing. Randall: I’ll make a motion. The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 10 foot west front yard setback, a 5 foot rear yard setback, a 9 percent lot coverage and a second driveway access variance for construction of the detached garage subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Discussions. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Tietz: Second. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 5 Aller: Having a motion and a second. Any further discussion? I will just say that I share your concerns regarding the, regarding a precedent for purposes of allowing a variance for this type of stated use and it is a substantial change in the property. However I think variances are taken on a case by case basis. Again I’m hoping that it doesn’t turn out to be a precedent and that we don’t hear a lot of it and my goal would be to limit those to those that we feel are reasonable use of the property consistent with the neighborhood and as Commissioner Tietz said the neighborhood has come in in favor of this particular modification so in that factor I think that meets the requirements for me to satisfy myself with the fact that it would be an appropriate use of the property under these conditions and circumstances which would allow for the variance so I’ll be voting for it. Any additional comments? Randall moved, Tietz seconded that the Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 10 foot west front yard setback, a 5 foot rear yard setback, a 9 percent lot coverage and a second driveway access variance for construction of a detached garage subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decisions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. The garage must be architecturally compatible with existing house and match color. 3. Vacation of the southern alley must be completed before the building permit application is submitted. 4. The second driveway shall be constructed using a pervious paver/geogrid system, the design of which shall be approved by the Water Resource Coordinator. The system must be installed by a certified installer. 5. The applicant shall construct an 8 foot in diameter rain garden in the southeast corner of the property, the design and installation of which shall be approved by the Water Resource Coordinator. 6. The property’s lot cover may not exceed 3,066 square feet, of which no more than 2,786 square feet may be impervious surface. All voted in favor, except Commissioner Madsen who opposed, and the motion carried with a vote of 3 to 1. Aller: So the motion carries 3 to 1. That is not a super majority. Aanenson: That’s correct so. Generous: It’s 75 percent of those present. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 6 Aanenson: Yeah. Generous: So it would be the final determination if it’s appealed. Aller: So it would move forward. Aanenson: No, it’s final unless it’s appealed. Yes. 75 percent of those in attendance. Aller: Oh that’s right. We only have 4 people here. Aanenson: You only have 4 people tonight so. Aller: So the motion carries and we move onto item 2. Thank you so much. And these items will be for public hearings. PUBLIC HEARING: 1651 MOTORPLEX COURT – REGISTERED LAND SURVEY (SUBDIVISION). Generous: Thank you Chairman Aller, commissioners. As you stated this is a public hearing to review a registered land survey and an amendment to a conditional use permit. The property’s located at 1651 Motorplex Court. Additionally there’s a second building on the south side that’s 1650 Motorplex Court as part of, it was approved previously with the conditional use permit and site plan review. This item will go to the City Council on February 12, 2018. The applicant is J&R Properties Limited Liability Company. Mr. LaMettry is the owner of that and he’s here tonight. Again this is 1651 Motorplex Court. It’s a unique property. It was, there were two properties as a part of the Motorplex development and as the Motorplex expanded over time it took pieces of this parcel away from it. When the LaMettry’s came in for site plan review, as a condition of approval he was to dedicate the land with the Bluff Creek corridor on the back side. There’s a wetland complex to the City. When he tried to record that deed transferring the property to the City of Chanhassen Carver County said no, they wouldn’t accept it. We were going to do a lot line adjustment and attach it to land that the City currently owns west of this parcel and told the owner that he would need to do a registered land survey to clean up all the exceptions from the descriptions. If you look at the registered land survey it’s a whole page of metes and bounds descriptions which is pretty confusing. This property is zoned industrial office park. It’s 24 acres in size. There are two building sites with existing buildings on the east side of this property right off Audubon and Motorplex Court which is a private street providing access to those buildings as well as to Audubon Motorplex. The registered land survey would create 3 tracts. Tract A is the property that contains the wetlands and the Bluff Creek primary zone on the west side. And then Tracts B and C on the east side contained two buildings that the applicant has constructed on there. Those two lots both meet the, exceed the minimum requirements of the IOP district. Staff is recommending approval of the registered land survey subject to the two conditions that they dedicate the land and that they memorialize the easement Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 7 to the property. Through their property for, in favor of Tract A. In reviewing the amendment to the PUD it was only due to the subdivision of the property that they had to change that. Our ordinance specifies that if you subdivide or change the lot line the CUP is, will be voided so he needed to amend it. The only reason he did the subdivision is because he couldn’t transfer the land to the property. The only portion of the site that’s within the Bluff Creek primary zone is actually Tract A so with the new PUD that would be, or new CUP that will be recorded against Tract A only and the rest of it would be eliminated. Additionally the initial conditional use permit was to permit multiple buildings. Two buildings on one lot. Well with this registered land survey that part goes away and so each of them have individual buildings on individual lots. The applicant is dedicating Tract A to the City in fulfillment of the original conditional use permit and also as a condition of this conditional use permit so we are recommending approval of the CUP amendment. Again they try, the reason they’re here is they tried to meet conditions that were imposed on them back in 2015. Carver County wouldn’t let them record that deed. Because they have to subdivide the CUP has to be amended and so we’re recommending approval of this whole thing so that we can get it finalized. With that I’d be happy to answer any questions. Aller: What did you say? Actually the report sets it out quite nicely and so does your explanation so a convoluted way of getting there but it looks like we will get there so any questions of staff at this point based on the report or the presentation? Okay, if the applicant could come forward. Welcome sir. State your name and address for the record and… Richard LaMettry: Richard LaMettry and I’m from Naples, Florida. Tietz: What are you doing up here? Richard LaMettry: This. Aller: He heard we had some warm weather today. Richard LaMettry: Yeah. So I mean it pretty much says, it’s just for the benefit of recording or transferring that wetlands to the City. Aller: Any questions of the applicant? Thank you sir for going through the process. This does require a public hearing so I’ll open up the public hearing for comment. Any individual wishing to speak either for or against this item can do so at this time. Opportunity to come forward. Seeing no one come forward I will close the public hearing. Open it up for discussion or action. Or comments. I think it’s pretty straight forward. Randall: Pretty straight forward yeah. Aller: I’ll entertain any motions that one of the commissioners would like to make at this time. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 8 Madsen: I can make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit and the Registered Land Survey and approves the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Randall: Second. Tietz: Second. Aller: Having a valid motion and second, any further discussion? Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit (#2015-19) for development within the Bluff Creek Corridor and the Registered Land Survey creating three parcels, subject to the following conditions of approval and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: Conditional Use Permit: 1. Development must comply with the Bluff Creek Corridor regulations. 2. Tract A shall be dedicated to the City. Subdivision: 1. Provide the City of Chanhassen with a copy of the current access and maintenance agreement for Motorplex Court. 2. Access to Tract A shall be included as part of the current access and maintenance agreement for Motorplex Court. 3. Identify and provide a Drainage and Utility easement over the publicly owned piping on the site. 4. Dedicate Tract A to the City of Chanhassen. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 9 Aller: Motion carries unanimously. Thank you again sir. Richard LaMettry: Nothing to it. PUBLIC HEARING: 7700 QUATTRO DRIVE – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO EXTEND COMMUNICATION TOWER. Generous: Thank you Chairman and commissioners. Again this is an amendment to an existing conditional use permit. They were approved for a 75 foot tower. As a condition of approval they were required to construct it so that it could be extended in the future to accommodate another set of antennas. However it was too short. Again this is a public hearing. This will go to City Council on February 12th. The applicant is Crown Castle Services and the property owner if Marilyn Beddor. This property is located at 7700 Quattro Drive. That’s actually in Hennepin County. It’s just north of Highway 5 and east of Dell Road. There’s an existing cell tower in the back yard and the property is zoned industrial office park. It’s over 2 acres in size. The location of the tower meets all our zoning requirements. Again the existing tower and equipment are behind the building, the northerly building on the site so they’re not visible from the public right-of-way. They would be adding 15.2 feet to the height of the tower and an additional 3 feet on top of that for a lightning rod. They will be putting in additional equipment platform on the rear and then they’re going to enclose that with a fence system. (Due to technical difficulties a portion of the staff report and the applicant’s presentation were not recorded.) Richard Krueger: …so yeah this is definitely no, yeah. Tietz: Taken into consideration. Richard Krueger: Absolutely yeah. Tietz: That was the only thing I was concerned with. With an aging, for an 18 year old structure and. Richard Krueger: Right, yeah they’ll do welding and there’s welding standards and stuff like that on the flange plate and all that kind of stuff so yeah. It’s, if it were to fail it would be very bad for the company and the public and you don’t hear about cell towers falling over for that reason. It’s very safe so. Yeah there’ll be, an act of God would have to happen basically. A 100 year flood down in Texas or something like that so yeah there’s a lot of testing that goes along with that. Tietz: Good, thanks. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 10 Richard Krueger: Yeah no problem. Aanenson: I was just going to add on that too Planning Commission members that those permits will be reviewed by the City so they have to submit those engineering reports so, before a permit would be issued to work on it. Tietz: Good, thanks. Aller: Based on the commissioners question or the response any additional comments or questions for the applicant? Seeing none. Oh Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I just see in our packet that the ordinance would allow for a taller tower. Do you anticipate in the future that to make it taller or could you add additionally at a later point in time? Richard Krueger: I think if they really wanted to do it. The impetus for this is Verizon, the carrier came to us and said we wanted coverage in this area. We looked at the tower. It says well we don’t have what we call a center line, RAD center line radio distribution center line so we’re going to extend the tower so the reason why we’re doing this right now, to this height is because it’s the most economically feasible one and frankly I’m not an engineer. I went to law school. I don’t know like the calculations and stuff like that but I’m guessing that if it got a little bit, if it got too tall that’s when we run into issues with structural integrity and also legislatively speaking there’s a 6409A passed by the U.S. government says you can go up to 20 feet. It’s called an eligible facilities request which this is so anything under 20 feet is not a substantial change to the tower and there’s other criteria too but if we’re talking about height it’s under 20 feet so they like to keep it underneath that no matter what because the cost benefit analysis, it wouldn’t really work to extend it another 10 feet and then run into an issue where it’s like, instead of going to 87 or 90 we’re going to 100 or 105 or something like that. It’s just more spooky. We’re getting into triple digits there so, as far as coming back and extending it, I don’t see that happening. But if it was to be the case that would be 20 years from now and by that time everything will be small cell anyways so. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Richard Krueger: Yeah no problem. Aller: Great, thank you very much. Just a follow up for staff. The conditions are requiring a building permit which will allow for a 90 foot tower and the structure would have to be substantially fit for 90 feet. Generous: Correct, it would have to meet the 90 miles an hour wind load and then the half inch of ice so. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 11 Aller: If they were to come back how high would it be for purposes of an administrative request as opposed to coming before us again. Generous: We only get 10 percent so 9 feet. Aller: Thank you. Now we’ll open up the public hearing portion of the item. Any individuals wishing to come forward can speak for or against the tower issue before us. Seeing no one come forward we’ll close the public hearing and comments or action. Randall: I have no comments. Madsen: Looks good. Aller: I’ll invite a motion then. Madsen: I’ll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: The Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit to permit the extension of the communication tower and approves the Findings of Fact and Recommendation. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a second? Randall: Second. Aller: Thank you Commissioner Randall. I have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Madsen moved, Randall seconded that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends approval of an amendment to Conditional Use Permit #2000-6 to permit the construction of an extension to the communication tower up to 90 feet monopole, plans prepared by Design 1, dated revised 04-10-17, and subject to the following conditions and adopts the Findings of Fact and Recommendation: 1. A building permit is required to construct the platform and tower extension; the tower must be designed for a 90 MPH wind load and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice. 2. The original plans must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 12 3. The contractor shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. 4. The applicant shall submit a detailed grading, drainage and erosion control plan for staff review and approval. 5. The tower extension shall be of the same color as the existing tower. 6. A letter of intent committing the tower owner and his or her successors to allow the shared use of the tower if an additional user agrees in writing to meet reasonable terms and conditions for shared use shall be submitted to the City. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. PUBLIC HEARING: 7555 WALNUT CURVE – VARIANCE TO BUILD A POOL. Walters: Alright this is Planning Case 2018-04, 7555 Walnut Curve. If appealed this would go before the City Council on February 12th. The applicant is requesting a 4.9 percent lot coverage variance for the construction of an in ground swimming pool and pool apron area. So it’s located in the Walnut Grove subdivision on 7555 Walnut Curve. This is a planned unit development. It has a minimum lot size of 10,400 square feet and then 30 foot front and rear setbacks. 10 foot, I’m sorry that should read 10 foot side setback and this zone, this PUD has a 30 percent lot coverage but properties within the shoreland overlay district are limited to 25 percent. This property is located within the shoreland overlay district due to the presence of a mapped stream or creek in the field to the east. There are 4 houses within the planned unit development, 4 single family homes within the planned unit development that are subject to this 25 percent limit. The property has a 14,283 square foot lot. There’s currently 26.4 percent lot coverage and it meets all required setbacks. The applicant is proposing to construct an 18 foot by 36 foot sport pool with a 566 square foot pool apron/patio area. They are proposing to install a rain garden in the southwest corner of the lot in order to capture a lot of the pool runoff. The property naturally drains towards that corner away from the stream so their rationale is most other similar properties within the PUD would be allowed the 30 percent. The intent of the shoreland management zone of protecting the creek can be met due to the grading of the lot even with the higher percentage and the applicant is planning on installing the rain garden and also an additional rain barrel to minimize runoff and impact on the stream. When staff looked at it water resources agreed with our assessment of the grading with the exception that they noticed that there’s a slightly lower dip here and they believe that if a one foot berm is constructed here to bring it all up to 1,000 foot elevation that it would then function as intended and direct any potential runoff away from that stream or creek. As you can see the creek is, looks to be pretty much plowed under in the field. We’re not exactly certain where it is there but it is, it does exist on the map so that does trigger the shoreland overlay district. Staff does believe that the intent of the overlay district of protecting the creek can be met through grading and through the use of the Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 13 rain garden and since other properties within the PUD are allowed the 30 percent lot coverage staff did feel it was appropriate and recommends approval of this variance. I’d be happy to take any questions you have at this time. Aller: Any questions of staff at this point in time? Commissioner Madsen. Madsen: I see on the map that there is a shed and a deck on the property as well. Was there ever any discussion on maybe reducing that size to help offset the lot coverage? Walters: If my memory serves there was not discussion on reducing, removing the shed. I believe we discussed minimizing the patio area around the deck but not in terms of actually rebuilding or reducing the deck. I would let the applicant comment on that. Madsen: Okay, thank you. Aller: Any additional questions at this point in time? Hearing none we’ll have the applicant come forward. If you could tell us your name and address for the record and then tell us about your project please. Jessica Hansgen: Do you want me to speak? Nick Hansgen: Go for it. Jessica Hansgen: Okay, Nick and Jessica Hansgen, 7555 Walnut Curve, Chanhassen. First time here. Not really sure what you want me to say. Aller: So why are we building the pool? Jessica Hansgen: Do you want to address the deck and the shed. Nick Hansgen: Well why are we building the pool. I’ll cover that real quick. We are very active in the community. We have 2 young kids and we found that we do not have the time to leave the city to go to a cabin or somewhere outside of our house and really want to kind of treat this as our oasis for our family and our friends because we are so active in what we do with youth sport activities. I’m a coach here. My wife volunteers all the time so we just don’t have the opportunity to leave so we really want to take advantage of this opportunity. And then with regards to the deck. Yeah we didn’t discuss that with MacKenzie in the conversation but we feel like again as part of the natural flow and drainage of the property this will actually help in reducing any rain off that will go the other way because of how we’ll have it positioned. As well as the rain garden that we’ll have in the corner to catch any runoff from the hardscape around the pool as well as an additional rain barrel that we will use to water all of our gardens around the property. Again to help with any sort of rain off that acre. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 14 Jessica Hansgen: The addition of that berm that was requested from the City will actually help level off the one lower corner so in the far right, kind of that pointiest corner right there is the low part which is wet anyway and we had discussed with our landscape company who’s here as well raising that anyway so when the City came back as a condition it actually works perfectly. Nick Hansgen: It was part of our plan. Jessica Hansgen: It was part of our eventual plan to raise that up anyways so that the entire property doesn’t drain. In fact that will pretty much make 100 percent of the property drain towards that drainage pond. Not the creek. Nick Hansgen: Yep. Aller: So the neighborhood has heard you want to build a pool. Jessica Hansgen: Oh yeah, they see it. Aller: And what comments have you had? Jessica Hansgen: They are very much in favor of it. Nick Hansgen: When’s the party? Jessica Hansgen: Yeah, yeah. Nick Hansgen: When can we come? Jessica Hansgen: We have a pretty active neighborhood in terms of kids who are around who are inbetween both of our sons. We’ve got a young one and then an older one and a lot of ages inbetween come over and they’re hoping it passes. They’re excited. We do have a couple other pools in the neighborhood but their kids are aging so in terms of the use and being around you know. Nick Hansgen: Limited. Aller: Any additional questions of the applicants at this time? Tietz: Just, I assume that with the excavation for the pool you’re going to have excess fill material which will make that construction of that berm a non-issue. Jessica Hansgen: Yeah. Nick Hansgen: Yep. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 15 Tietz: I’m sure that the grading that’s going to occur back there is going to. Nick Hansgen: Yep, that was our plan. Tietz: It’s a nice place to unload some material. Jessica Hansgen: Yeah that was actually like I mentioned in our favor. Tietz: Yeah so it’s good. Jessica Hansgen: Yeah it gives our boys a nice flat area. Tietz: Yeah we just have to find that creek you know. Jessica Hansgen: Yeah right… Nick Hansgen: The farmer… Tietz: The farmers that plowed it for 25 years. Nick Hansgen: He plows it. He fields it every single year. Can’t see it anywhere back there. It is pretty much dried up. Jessica Hansgen: The turkeys and the deer like it. Nick Hansgen: Turkeys and deer are there but yeah, there’s, you can’t see anything back there at all. Aller: Great, thank you. And this is a public hearing item so I’ll open up the public hearing portion of this item for any individual wishing to come forward and speak either for or against the item. Hearing no one, seeing no one come forward I’ll go ahead and close the public hearing portion of this item and open it up for discussion and action by the commissioners. Randall: I think it’s an improvement of the property even with the variance. The way they planned it out and everything, I like it. If I’m going to approve a variance it definitely passes my approval I guess. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: Yeah. Aller: Well any motions or actions suggested at this time, I’ll invite a motion. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 16 Tietz: I’ll make a motion. Aller: Commissioner Tietz. Tietz: The Chanhassen Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 4.9 percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decisions. Aller: I have a motion. Do I have a valid second? Madsen: Second. Aller: I have a second. Having a motion and a second any further discussion? Tietz moved, Madsen seconded that the Board of Appeals and Adjustments approves a 4.9 percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decisions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. Lot coverage may not exceed 4,266 square feet. 3. A low berm must be constructed in the southeast corner of the lot as depicted in Attachment 6: WRC Required Berm. 4. The applicant must purchase and install a fourth rain barrel. 5. A rain garden must be installed in the southwest corner of the property. The design of the rain garden and installation must be verified by the City’s Water Resources Coordinator. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Madsen noted the Summary and Verbatim Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated January 2, 2018. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS. None. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS. Aller: Future Planning Commission agendas. We do have some changes there. Planning Commission – January 16, 2018 17 Aanenson: Thank you Chair. We did have one item scheduled for February 6th and that’s a conditional use permit amendment for Arbor Glen. Because there was just one item and typically when we do the interviews on the 20th we’d like to have some other items so the candidates can stay and listen to that item and, those items and kind of get a flavor for it so I know Mark’s going to be absent on that meeting but, so we would cancel the meeting on the 6th and then move the Arbor Glen. That’s our one item that we know is in. Something potentially could come in the next, by this Friday and then we’d also do the annual report. Typically we’ve done that in the work session. Our goal right now under the work session, we’re going to be populating this with a few more things as we’re tracking some bigger projects would be that we would go through all the jurisdictional comments that we got on the comp plan so everybody’s kind of embedded in that and then, so we’d have those public hearings on that coming up in April so. Aller: Great. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Commissioner Randall moved to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The Planning Commission meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Variance Request: 7052 Minnewashta Parkway Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: PC 2017­19 PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council makes the determination that under current city ordinance a wetland buffer and setback variance is not required for the construction of a single­family home at 7052 Minnewashta Parkway.” Council approval requires a Majority Vote of the entire council. SUMMARY The applicant and property owner have appealed the Board of Appeals and Adjustments decision approving a 10­ foot buffer variance, requiring a 40­foot wetland buffer, and a 30­foot wetland buffer setback variance, requiring a 20­ foot wetland buffer setback. The applicant wants to construct a single­family home on a lot zoned Single­Family Residential 38.2 feet from the wetland edge at its closest. They contend that the wetland buffer and setback requirements are not applicable to their property. Planning Commission Summary The Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, held a public hearing on January 2, 2018, to review the proposed request. The Board voted four in favor and one against a motion approving an amended variance for the applicant subject to the conditions of the staff report. Since it was greater than a 75 percent positive vote for the variance, it would have been a final determination if the applicant had not appealed the decision. Planning Commission minutes from January 2, 2018 are included in the consent agenda for the February 12, 2018, City Council packet. BACKGROUND Ordinance #47AR, July 23, 1984. City requires 75­foot setback from wetlands. On June 26, 1989, the city approved a variance (#89­7) to permit the construction of a single­family home 25 feet from the edge of a Class A wetland. Ordinance #180, December 14, 1992. City amends ordinance to create four wetland classifications. Pre­1992 parcels must meet 100 or 75­foot wetland setback. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectVariance Request: 7052 Minnewashta ParkwaySectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.5.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: PC 2017­19PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council makes the determination that under current city ordinance a wetland buffer andsetback variance is not required for the construction of a single­family home at 7052 Minnewashta Parkway.”Council approval requires a Majority Vote of the entire council.SUMMARYThe applicant and property owner have appealed the Board of Appeals and Adjustments decision approving a 10­foot buffer variance, requiring a 40­foot wetland buffer, and a 30­foot wetland buffer setback variance, requiring a 20­foot wetland buffer setback. The applicant wants to construct a single­family home on a lot zoned Single­FamilyResidential 38.2 feet from the wetland edge at its closest. They contend that the wetland buffer and setbackrequirements are not applicable to their property.Planning Commission SummaryThe Planning Commission, as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, held a public hearing on January 2, 2018, toreview the proposed request. The Board voted four in favor and one against a motion approving an amended variancefor the applicant subject to the conditions of the staff report. Since it was greater than a 75 percent positive vote forthe variance, it would have been a final determination if the applicant had not appealed the decision.Planning Commission minutes from January 2, 2018 are included in the consent agenda for the February 12, 2018,City Council packet.BACKGROUNDOrdinance #47AR, July 23, 1984. City requires 75­foot setback from wetlands.On June 26, 1989, the city approved a variance (#89­7) to permit the construction of a single­family home 25 feetfrom the edge of a Class A wetland.Ordinance #180, December 14, 1992. City amends ordinance to create four wetland classifications. Pre­1992 parcels must meet 100 or 75­foot wetland setback. Ordinance #320, May 29, 2001. Wetland setbacks established for accessory structures. Ordinance #377, May 24, 2004. Ordinance amended to increase minimum wetland buffer requirements. Pre­2004 parcels must meet 100 or 75­foot wetland setback. Ordinance #449, May 14, 2007. Five wetland classifications established and specify that wetland classification meet Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions, MnRAM. Pre­2007 lots must comply with the standards in effect at the time of their being subdivided. For pre­1992 lots, reduced setbacks were possible with the creation of buffer areas in conformance with the revised standards. It was the intent of the ordinance to provide relief for earlier lots by permitting the use of buffers and lessor setbacks. A minimum wetland setback was intended. However, the language did not clearly state that requirement. DISCUSSION Staff interpretation was that the property owner was required to meet the standards of the Wetland Protection ordinance requiring a wetland buffer and setback as required by City Code Section 20­411. However, after reviewing the ordinance with the City Attorney, the plain language reading of Section 20­411 does not provide clear and unambiguous standards for lots created before May 14, 2007, of which this parcel is one. (It should be noted that since May 2007, there have been no other instances where this defect in the regulations has been involved.) Any development of the property must still comply with the requirements of other regulatory agencies with jurisdictional authority including the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), and Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). The applicant must receive all necessary permits and approvals from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District prior to the construction of the house on the property. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council make the determination that a variance approval from Chanhassen City Code is not necessary for the construction of the proposed single­family home on the property. However, the applicant must comply with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as well as all other zoning code, building, and fire code requirements. ATTACHMENTS: History of Chanhassen’s Wetland Ordinance Matrix Survey 11­28­17 Ordinance #449 History of Chanhassen’s Wetland Ordinance (Setbacks and Buffers) It is staff’s belief that the intent of Ordinance 449 was to provide relief to lots of record from before 12/14/92 without established subdivision standards by subjecting them to a 40’ principal structure setback rather than the 75’ primary and accessory structure setback that was established on 7/23/1984; however, the language that was used in Section 20-411(d) has been interpreted to mean that lots of record from before May 14, 2007 without setbacks and buffers established by subdivisions, site plans, or wetland alteration permits do not have any city mandated wetland setback or buffer requirements. These properties would still be subject to any applicable watershed or DNR setback and buffer requirements. Date Ordinance Categories Setbacks Buffers Grandfathering 7/23/84 47AR Class A 75' OHW NA None (original) Class B 75' OHW NA None (original) 12/14/92 180 Pristine 100' 20-100' (50' avg) Pre 12/14/92-100' or specified by approved wetland alteration permit or meet new standards Natural 40' (buffer edge) 10-30' (20' avg) Pre 12/14/92-75' or specified by approved wetland alteration permit or meet new standards Ag/Urban 40' (buffer edge) 0-20' (10' avg) Pre 12/14/92-75' or specified by approved wetland alteration permit or meet new standards Utilized 0' 0' 0' 5/29/01 320 Same Now apply to accessory Same Same 5/24/04 377 Pristine 100' 35-100' (50' avg) 12/15/92 to 5/24/04 see 180; pre 12/14/92 100' or meet new standards Natural 40' (buffer edge) 20-30' (20' avg) 12/15/92 to 5/24/04 see 180; pre 12/14/92 75' or meet new standards Ag/Urban 40' (buffer edge) 16.5' (avg) 12/15/92 to 5/24/04 see 180; pre 12/14/92 75' or meet new standards Utilized 0' 0' 0' 5/14/07 449 Outstanding 50'/50' (P/A)(buffer edge) 50' (min) Pre 5/14/07 standards in site plan/subdivision prevail, except no principal less than 40'. May create buffer to new standards to reduce accessory structure setback to allow placement within last 20' or 50% of existing principal structure setback, whichever is less. Preserve 40'/20' (P/A)(buffer edge) 40' (min) Manage 1 30'/15' (P/A)(buffer edge) 25' (min) Manage 2 30'/15' (P/A)(buffer edge) 20' (min) Manage 3 30'/15' (P/A)(buffer edge) 16.5' (min) Traverse PC CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­09: Approve Purchase of Two Fire Department Command Vehicles Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: ADM 238P (new file) PROPOSED MOTION The City Council approves the purchase of two replacement command vehicles as part of CIP project EQ–054. Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The Chanhassen Fire Department command structure includes a Fire Chief, three Assistant Chiefs, and a Fire Marshal. Fire service operating guidelines strongly support the arrival of an on­scene commander to assess the incident and direct incoming fire apparatus and crews. This is accomplished by providing an emergency response command vehicle to the command staff so they can respond directly from their home or while working in the community performing regularly assigned duties. The design and equipment in this vehicle supports initial response to fire calls and specialized equipment to support incident command functions. Additionally, emergency medical service calls represent a significant amount of the call load on a monthly basis. Command staff responds directly to these calls and are state certified to the Emergency Medical Technician level. A direct response by trained medical professionals can improve outcomes and provide better service to the community. This request is to replace two existing vehicles: a 2008 Chevrolet Pickup and a 2010 Chevrolet Impala. The pickup has reached serviceable life for a command vehicle and the impala does not meet the first response capabilities of the Fire Marshal. The Capital Replacement Equipment Fund will partially fund this project. The remainder of the cost will be supplemented by the auction sales of the vehicles being replaced. Additionally, the fire department will auction off a rescue truck from Station 2 to offset expenditures. Total proceeds from the sale of the vehicles is approximately $30,000. The vehicles will be purchased through a State of Minnesota Contract and bids were obtained for graphics and emergency lighting equipment. The lowest bidder will be utilized for those items. Miscellaneous loose equipment was obtained through sole source vendors. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends purchasing the vehicles as presented in the package. Due to customization and multiple vendor scheduling issues, an actual in­service date for these vehicles will be 8­12 weeks from purchase approval. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­09: Approve Purchase of Two Fire Department Command VehiclesSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.6.Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: ADM 238P (new file)PROPOSED MOTIONThe City Council approves the purchase of two replacement command vehicles as part of CIP project EQ–054.Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe Chanhassen Fire Department command structure includes a Fire Chief, three Assistant Chiefs, and a FireMarshal. Fire service operating guidelines strongly support the arrival of an on­scene commander to assess theincident and direct incoming fire apparatus and crews. This is accomplished by providing an emergency responsecommand vehicle to the command staff so they can respond directly from their home or while working in thecommunity performing regularly assigned duties. The design and equipment in this vehicle supports initial response tofire calls and specialized equipment to support incident command functions.Additionally, emergency medical service calls represent a significant amount of the call load on a monthly basis.Command staff responds directly to these calls and are state certified to the Emergency Medical Technician level. Adirect response by trained medical professionals can improve outcomes and provide better service to the community.This request is to replace two existing vehicles: a 2008 Chevrolet Pickup and a 2010 Chevrolet Impala. The pickup hasreached serviceable life for a command vehicle and the impala does not meet the first response capabilities of the FireMarshal. The Capital Replacement Equipment Fund will partially fund this project. The remainder of the cost will besupplemented by the auction sales of the vehicles being replaced. Additionally, the fire department will auction off arescue truck from Station 2 to offset expenditures. Total proceeds from the sale of the vehicles is approximately $30,000.The vehicles will be purchased through a State of Minnesota Contract and bids were obtained for graphics andemergency lighting equipment. The lowest bidder will be utilized for those items. Miscellaneous loose equipment wasobtained through sole source vendors.RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends purchasing the vehicles as presented in the package. Due to customization and multiple vendor scheduling issues, an actual in­service date for these vehicles will be 8­12 weeks from purchase approval. ATTACHMENTS: CIP Worksheet Total Cost with Descriptions Supporting Bids and Documents Resolution CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: January 22, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF A TWO (2) REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMAND VEHICLES WHEREAS, emergency response command vehicles are required for use by the Fire Department Command Staff in order to respond directly from their home or while working in the community performing regularly assigned duties; and WHEREAS, the design and equipment in these vehicles supports initial response to fire calls and specialized equipment to support incident command functions; and WHEREAS, the Fire Department is requesting to replace two existing command vehicles: a 2008 Chevrolet Pickup and a 2010 Chevrolet Impala; and WHEREAS, the pickup has reached serviceable life for a command vehicle and the Impala does not meet the first response capabilities of the Fire Marshal; and WHEREAS, the Capital Replacement Equipment Fund will partially fund this purchase. The remainder of the cost will be supplemented by the auction sales of the vehicles being replaced. Additionally, the Fire Department will auction off a rescue truck from Station 2 to offset expenditures. Total proceeds from the sale of the vehicles is approximately $30,000. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council approve the purchase of two (2) replacement Fire Department Command Vehicles. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of January, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­10: Approve the Purchase of Exhaust Gas Venting System for Fire Stations Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.7. Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: ADM 238O (new file) PROPOSED MOTION "The City Council adopts a resolution authorizing the Fire Department to purchase and install an Exhaust Gas Ventilation System at both fire stations." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The Fire Department will install complete exhaust recovery systems at both fire stations to capture and evacuate harmful diesel fumes created each time a diesel­powered apparatus is started within the fire station. BACKGROUND Over the past two years, the Chanhassen Fire Department has made great strides to reduce the exposure to harmful, cancer­causing carcinogenic exposures related to firefighter duties. Some of the active environmental controls we have put in place so far include the following: Obtained a State Grant to replace a gear extractor wash machine to properly clean firefighter turnout gear after exposure. Instituted mandatory gross decontamination procedures before leaving the scene of any fire or hazardous materials exposure for all firefighters. Decontamination kits are available on all trucks and personnel have been trained on proper use. Instituted a mandatory gear­wash policy for all firefighters after returning from a call that has exposed a firefighter to fire or hazardous materials. Each time a diesel engine is started in the bay, harmful gases are introduced into the air. Diesel fumes contain Benzene, Benzo(a)pyrene, and Formaldehyde which are Group 1 carcinogens and listed as dangerous to humans. Several other Group 2 chemicals and Carbon Monoxide are also byproducts of diesel exhaust released into the stations. Although we can currently limit vehicles idling in the bay, we cannot control driving in and out of the bay and the fumes related to routine use of the vehicles. One only needs to look at the walls and the ceilings of the fire stations to see the soot from the exhaust created from years of exposure. As we look at our wellness plan, the exhaust gas recovery system is the next primary intervention and environmental control to put in place. In 2013, the department submitted an American Fire Service Grant (AFG) request to install these systems. The grant was not awarded. This was introduced to city staff as a project for 2018 and funding is CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­10: Approve the Purchase of Exhaust Gas Venting System for Fire StationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.7.Prepared By Don Johnson, Fire Chief File No: ADM 238O (new file)PROPOSED MOTION"The City Council adopts a resolution authorizing the Fire Department to purchase and install an Exhaust GasVentilation System at both fire stations."Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe Fire Department will install complete exhaust recovery systems at both fire stations to capture and evacuateharmful diesel fumes created each time a diesel­powered apparatus is started within the fire station.BACKGROUNDOver the past two years, the Chanhassen Fire Department has made great strides to reduce the exposure to harmful,cancer­causing carcinogenic exposures related to firefighter duties. Some of the active environmental controls we haveput in place so far include the following:Obtained a State Grant to replace a gear extractor wash machine to properly clean firefighter turnout gear afterexposure.Instituted mandatory gross decontamination procedures before leaving the scene of any fire or hazardousmaterials exposure for all firefighters. Decontamination kits are available on all trucks and personnel have beentrained on proper use.Instituted a mandatory gear­wash policy for all firefighters after returning from a call that has exposed afirefighter to fire or hazardous materials.Each time a diesel engine is started in the bay, harmful gases are introduced into the air. Diesel fumes contain Benzene,Benzo(a)pyrene, and Formaldehyde which are Group 1 carcinogens and listed as dangerous to humans. Several otherGroup 2 chemicals and Carbon Monoxide are also byproducts of diesel exhaust released into the stations. Althoughwe can currently limit vehicles idling in the bay, we cannot control driving in and out of the bay and the fumes related toroutine use of the vehicles. One only needs to look at the walls and the ceilings of the fire stations to see the soot fromthe exhaust created from years of exposure.As we look at our wellness plan, the exhaust gas recovery system is the next primary intervention and environmental control to put in place. In 2013, the department submitted an American Fire Service Grant (AFG) request to install these systems. The grant was not awarded. This was introduced to city staff as a project for 2018 and funding is recommended from the Capital Improvement Plan. The equipment and installation is provided by a sole­source provider, Plymovent. Additional installation work related to electrical and breaching the roof will be handled by contractors hired by the city.  After installation, each diesel­powered apparatus will be connected by magnetic coupler to a rated hose that connects to a rail system in the station. The rail systems are connected to a ventilation fan that moves exhaust gases from the vehicles to the exterior of the building. The hoses automatically disconnect from the vehicle as the vehicle drives out of the station. A firefighter meets the backing apparatus at the bay door connecting the magnetic coupler to the vehicle as it is backing into the station. The system all but eliminates harmful diesel exhaust from being released into the station. Cost Breakdown: Station 1 = $37,972 Station 2 = $18,752 Miscellaneous work related to breaching the roof and electrical connection subcontracted by the city is approximately $6,000. Total approximate cost of the project = $62,724 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council approve the purchase and installation of Plymovent Exhaust Gas Ventilation systems in both fire stations using the Capital Improvement Program for a funding source. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CIP Sheet TNC Bid Plymovent Brochure CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: January 22, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF AN EXHAUST GAS VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR BOTH FIRE STATIONS WHEREAS, over the past two years, the Chanhassen Fire Department has made great strides to reduce the exposure to harmful, cancer-causing carcinogenic exposures related to firefighter duties; and WHEREAS, diesel exhaust in fire stations is recognized as a significant issue related to firefighter occupational exposure; and WHEREAS, each time a diesel engine is started in the bay, harmful gases are introduced into the air; and WHEREAS, although idling of vehicles can be limited in the bay, the fumes related to routine use of the vehicles and driving in and out of the bay cannot be controlled; and WHEREAS, according to the fire department’s wellness plan, the exhaust gas recovery system is the next primary intervention and environmental control to put in place. In 2013, the department submitted an American Fire Service Grant (AFG) request to install these systems. The grant was not awarded; and WHEREAS, the exhaust gas recovery system is scheduled to be purchased and installed as a project in the 2018 Capital Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, the equipment and installation will be provided by a sole-source provider, Plymovent. Additional installation work related to electrical and breaching the roof will be handled by contractors hired by the city. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council approve the purchase and installation of Plymovent Exhaust Gas Ventilation Systems in both fire stations at a total approximate cost of $62,724 to be funded by the 2018 Capital Improvement Program. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22th day of January, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT g:\admin\resol\2018\1-22-18\fire dept exhaust system.docx Do you protect your fi refi ghters? REMOVE DIESEL EXHAUST FROM YOUR FIRE STATION 2 EVER WONDER ABOUT THE VALUE OF CLEAN AIR? WHY PLYMOVENT ■A genuine commitment to customer needs ■System solutions ■Expertise gained over decades ■High-quality products ■Global presence We do. For more than 35 years we have made it our business to ensure clean air in fi re stations. We provide high-quality products to protect fi refi ghters and others from exposure to hazardous diesel exhaust. We offer a broad range of exhaust extraction systems, supported by complete engineering services. Contact us to fi nd out what genuine commitment to customer requirements really means. 33 Hazardous vehicle exhaust emissions in a fi re station are a fi refi ghter’s most signifi cant cancer health risk and could be a serious legal liability for the fi re department. Eliminate this hazard from your fi re station with Plymovent’s code compliant vehicle exhaust capture and removal systems. From existing stations, to new turn key facilities, our totally automatic start-up and disconnect source capture systems are the recommended method for controlling exhaust emissions at your station. Your fi refi ghters deserve nothing less. REMOVE THE DANGERS OF DIESEL EXHAUST Chemical Health effect* Benzene Group 1, carcinogen to humans Benzo(a)pyrene Group 1, carcinogen to humans Formaldehyde Group 1, carcinogen to humans Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans Benzofuran Group 2B, possibly carcinogenic to humans Carbon monoxide Life threatening to humans Nitric oxides Life threatening to humans *Source: OSHA.gov, IARC.fr DANGERS OF DIESEL EXHAUST 4 SOURCE CAPTURE PLYMOVENT SOURCE CAPTURE SYSTEMS: THE PNEUMATIC OR MAGNETIC GRABBER® SETTING THE INDUSTRY STANDARD At the source capture of airborne particles, prior to their spreading in the local environment, is the most effi cient method to achieve a safe and healthy working environment. It minimizes the amount of air that needs to be removed, thereby reducing the total investment in air handling equipment and also reducing the total energy consumption. A key component to our system is the sealed nozzle design called the Grabber®. The Plymovent Grabber® is available in either a pneumatic or a magnetic version. With the Grabber®, the Plymovent system can provide a virtually 100% source capture performance hereby meeting various regulations. The Grabber® connects to the tailpipe, capturing and eliminating virtually all exhaust fumes. Plus, it is simple to use: ■Magnetic Grabber® Just attach it to the tailpipe and you are done. We call this the Plymovent "click and seal" principle. ■Pneumatic Grabber® Attach it to the tailpipe, and push the fi ll valve to quickly ensure a positive seal around any size tailpipe; capturing and eliminating the chance that dangerous exhaust fumes will escape into your station. 5 DESIGNED FOR PURPOSE Each system is designed to remove hazardous exhaust and provide for a healthier working environment. Based on years of experience working in the air treatment business, Plymovent has developed a totally reliable approach, we call it "engineered solutions". This approach ensures we offer an optimal solution for providing clean air in your working environment, taking such important elements into account as value for money and effi cient operation. The philosophy of Plymovent is to deliver quality systems that are safe, user friendly, regulation compliant and that will enhance the quality of life for your fi refi ghters and emergency service personnel. That is why we have developed a line of source capture systems designed to meet your station’s needs: ■Under Carriage Track Systems - for single and double bay applications ■Under Carriage Rail Systems - for drive through bays with up to four vehicles ■Vertical Stack Rail Systems - for vehicles with overhead exhaust stacks 6 UNDER CARRIAGE TRACK SYSTEMS KEY ADVANTAGES SBT SYSTEM: ■Models handle up to 60 feet deep back-in bays ■Auto-disconnect at the exit door ■Attach the Grabber® from the vertical position ■Aluminium track: light-weight and strong ■End stops with rubber shock absorbers take up kinetic energy from trolleys ■Adjustable release points depending on the speed of the vehicle ■Pre-fi tted yellow/black extraction hose ■Virtually 100% source capture through a unique automatic Grabber® nozzle; available in sizes to fi t all emergency response vehicle tailpipe sizes ■Automatic start-stop of fan by an exhaust sensor ■Safety disconnect coupling; fail safe system, easily re-connectable ■Suitable for existing fi re stations and new design-built stations The Sliding Balancer Track System (SBT) has set the standard for vehicle emission control for fi re and emergency response vehicles around the world using either the Magnetic or Pneumatic Grabber®. The SBT system is the preferred system for back-in and drive through apparatus bays, and is designed to connect to any motor vehicle tailpipe while capturing virtually 100% of the exhaust emissions. The SBT system is used in single, and double vehicle applications where the vehicle tailpipe is within 60 feet of the door. It is a fully automatic system, including fan activation and system disconnect from the exiting vehicle. The SBT system is fully code compliant, and there is a one-step connection to the system as a vehicle enters the station. If you are looking for an exhaust removal system that you can connect at the door before backing in and have it automatically disconnect when you leave, the SBT is right for your application. UNDER CARRIAGE RAIL SYSTEMS 7 The Straight Rail System (STR) is the preferred system for drive through and in tandem apparatus bays using either the Magnetic or Pneumatic Grabber®. The Plymovent STR system is designed to connect to any motor vehicle tailpipe and captures virtually 100% of the exhaust emissions. This system is ideal for drive through bays or bays with up to four vehicles parked in tandem. Everything within the system is automatic, from the fan activation to the automatic release from the exiting vehicle. There is a one-step connection to the system as the vehicle enters the station. Also, the STR system is code compliant, and has a solid one-piece extruded aluminium rail profi les offering strength and durability. KEY ADVANTAGES STR SYSTEM: ■Models to handle up to 150 feet ■Exhaust hose sizes for all vehicle types ■Auto-disconnect at the exit door ■Door-to-door removal of harmful emissions ■Speed absorbing shock system ■Front and rear door release ■Expandable design ■Allows for up to four vehicles in tandem ■Adjustable release points depending on speed of call-out release ■Virtually 100% source capture through a unique automatic Grabber® nozzle; available in sizes to fi t all emergency response vehicle tailpipe sizes ■Automatic start-stop of fan by an exhaust sensor ■Safety disconnect coupling; fail safe system, easily re-connectable ■Suitable for existing fi re stations and new design-built stations The Vertical Stack Rail System (VSR) is the solution for vehicles that have top exhaust stacks and need to move through an apparatus bay. The Plymovent VSR system is designed for vehicles with overhead exhaust stacks. With no operator intervention needed, the “V” shaped catcher guides the vehicle tailpipe into the rail profi le. The rail profi le is a free-fl oating system that allows side-to-side movement of the entire system and automatically aligns itself with the vehicle’s tailpipe. The system is fully automated from fan start to disconnect. Along with being completely code compliant, the VSR system offers a solid one piece extruded aluminum rail profi le that provides strength and durability. KEY ADVANTAGES VSR SYSTEM: ■Floating suspension ■Adjustable capture stack ■Fits any vehicle stack ■One piece aluminium rail ■A fully automatic system ■Expandable system to almost any length ■Adapter cone designed for both empty and loaded vehicles ■12” lateral movement to either side ■Flexible duct connection ■Sealing rubber lips ■Automatic return to position after lateral movement ■Secure wire; fail safe ■Suitable for existing fi re stations and new design-built stations VERTICAL STACK RAIL SYSTEMS 8 9 WHY CONTROL EQUIPMENT: FINANCIAL REASONS A fully automatic controlled system will enable you to substantially lower your use of electricity and overall energy consumption. This creates a solid and viable investment for your station. ENVIRONMENTAL REASONS The control equipment which we have in our product range enables an on- demand use of the system. The result of installing our control equipment is a reduction of electricity consump- tion and lower heating cost due to the fact that the system is only used when needed. Lower energy consumption will also have a positive effect on the global environment. ...ABOUT DIESEL EXHAUST The World Health Organization (WHO) classifi ed diesel engine exhaust as carcinogenic to humans, based on suffi cient evidence that exposure is associated with an increased risk for lung cancer.* The EPA has determined that the size of the average diesel exhaust particle size is 0.2 microns. These particles are typically not visible to the human eye. Diesel exhaust particles are often too small to be captured by onboard fi lters. Toxic gases are not captured by particulate fi lters, and only partially by activated carbon fi lters. The Plymovent source capture system captures these particles and gases before they enter the fi re station, and expels them to the outside. As a fi re truck exits the station, diesel exhaust is expelled with force. The Plymovent source capture system prevents it from being spread throughout the fi re station including the living quarters.** Diesel exhaust particles and gases are suspended in the air, so exposure to this pollutant occurs whenever a person breathes air that contains these substances. Like all fuel-burning equipment, diesel exhaust contains nitrogen oxides. Nitrogen oxides can damage lung tissue, lower the body’s resistance to respiratory infection and worsen chronic lung diseases, such as asthma. Plymovent source capture systems provide a sealed nozzle system which have been proven in over 50,000 installations over the past 35 years.*** * Based on the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) June 12, 2012 press release. ** The operation of exhaust extraction systems can be affected by various factors including proper design of the system, operating procedures, and service and maintenance. Exposure levels should be checked upon installation and periodically thereafter to ensure that they fall within applicable regulations and exposure limit values. *** Plymovent systems are made code compliant, please ensure the system is properly designed, operated, serviced and maintained. IMPORTANT FACTS... GRABBER® ■Virtually 100% source capture ■Simple to use ■Controlled release 10 BALANCER ■Adjustable ■Strong but light weight ■Back up safety chain ■Closed housing MAGNETIC GRABBER® ■Easy to operate "click and seal" ■Virtually 100% source capture ■Conical design for easy use STR / SBT TROLLEY ■Self supporting ■Internal & external wheels ■Adjustable impact cushions ■Bi-directional release VSR CATCHER ■Entry guide ■Sealed entry gate ■12” lateral movement to either side VERTICAL STACK RAIL SYSTEM UNDER CARRIAGE RAIL SYSTEMS PNEUMATIC WHAT IS THE BEST SOLUTION FOR YOU? RAILS/TRACKS ■We offer various aluminium rails & tracks equipped with features answering to the demands from different applications. FANS ■We offer a wide range of fans covering most requirements in a variety of applications. ■In-house manufactured ■AMCA Certifi ed 11 ■In-house manufactured ■UL Listed We can provide a diesel exhaust removal system specifi cally tailored to your needs. HOSE ASSEMBLIES ■Multiple lengths ■High temperature resistance SAFETY DISCONNECT ■Protects system ■360 degree swivel ■Soft cover ■No hose obstruction ■Easy to operate and handle UNDER CARRIAGE TRACK SYSTEMS CONTROLS ■We offer fully automatic control systems which will operate your exhaust system in the most effi cient way. www.plymovent.com Your authorized Plymovent distributor: SALES OFFICE DISTRIBUTORS REFERENCE We have installed over 50,000 source capture systems across the world. Here are some examples: USA Atlantic City, NJ USA Austin, TX USA Baltimore County, MD USA Boston, MA USA Buffalo, NY USA Charlotte, NC USA Chicago, IL USA Cincinnati, OH USA Dallas, TX USA Detroit, MI USA Kansas City, KS Canada Waterloo, Ontario China Shanghai England Norfolk England Oxfordshire Finland Helsinki France Cateau France Noailles France Nanterre Germany Munich Germany Berlin Germany Cologne USA Las Vegas, NV USA Lexington, KY USA Los Angeles, CA USA New Orleans, LA USA Brevard County, FL USA Raleigh, NC USA Santa Barbara, CA Canada Winnepeg, Manitoba Canada Clearview, Ontario Canada Gatineau, Quebec Canada Guelph, Ontario Germany Frankfurt Germany Hamburg Hungary Budapest Ireland Dublin Italy Bologna Portugal Azores Islands Serbia Belgrade Spain Granada Sweden Stockholm Sweden Gothenburg, Sweden Malmö Plymovent cares about the air you breathe. We offer products, systems and services which ensure clean air at work, anywhere in the world. We respect the environment and we deliver high-quality products. Our expertise gained over many years and our genuine commitment to customer requirements enable us to provide precisely the solutions you need. plymoventusa @plymoventusa Plymovent reserves the right to make design changes. BRO_Fire_Letter_EN/O +PlymoventEE Plymovent Corp. is ISO 9001:2008 Certifi ed. Plymovent Corp. T +1 800 644 0911 5 Corporate Drive T +1 609 395 3500 Cranbury, NJ 08512 F +1 609 655 0569 USA E info.usa@plymovent.com CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­11: Authorize Support of TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan, Carver County Parks Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.8. Prepared By Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director File No: RA­ 207 (Trails, Highway) PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a resolution supporting the TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan, Carver County Parks." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Carver County needs to officially map a TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan to be eligible to receive regional funding to complete a trail connection to the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum.  The first segment planned for construction is Segment #2, which is from Minnewashta Parkway to Century Boulevard through the Arboretum. The proposed cost of this segment is $2,547,430. Carver County has received a TE grant for this project and will be submitting additional grant applications for federal and state dollars to help pay for this project.  No expenditures of funds are being requested at this time.  A future local match (2020) for the project is currently estimated at $350,000 PK&T ­ 138  This amount is currently programmed in the city's Park and Trail Improvement Fund.  BACKGROUND Carver County recently completed the TH Regional Trail “Draft” Master Plan for the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail to the Hennepin County line at Dell Road. When complete, the TH 5 Regional Trail will extend 8.9 miles from the Carver County/Hennepin County line in Chanhassen, west to the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail in Victoria. The trail will provide an off­road alternative for people to travel east and west for commuting or recreation, with connections to downtown Chanhassen, the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and the Lake Minnetonka Regional Trail. Many local trail systems connect to the trail corridor and the trail will create links to popular parks and will fulfil a segment of the Regional Trail Search Corridor as identified by the Metropolitan Council. Carver County spent a significant amount of time researching the corridor with the assistance of a Project Steering Committee and seeking public comments through open houses, pop­up events, press releases, online surveys, and websites. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­11: Authorize Support of TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan, Carver CountyParksSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.8.Prepared By Todd Hoffman, Park and RecreationDirector File No: RA­ 207 (Trails, Highway)PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a resolution supporting the TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan, Carver County Parks."Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYCarver County needs to officially map a TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan to be eligible to receive regional funding tocomplete a trail connection to the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum.  The first segment planned for construction isSegment #2, which is from Minnewashta Parkway to Century Boulevard through the Arboretum. The proposed costof this segment is $2,547,430. Carver County has received a TE grant for this project and will be submitting additionalgrant applications for federal and state dollars to help pay for this project. No expenditures of funds are being requested at this time.  A future local match (2020) for the project is currentlyestimated at $350,000 PK&T ­ 138  This amount is currently programmed in the city's Park and Trail ImprovementFund. BACKGROUNDCarver County recently completed the TH Regional Trail “Draft” Master Plan for the Lake Minnetonka LRT RegionalTrail to the Hennepin County line at Dell Road. When complete, the TH 5 Regional Trail will extend 8.9 miles from theCarver County/Hennepin County line in Chanhassen, west to the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail in Victoria.The trail will provide an off­road alternative for people to travel east and west for commuting or recreation, withconnections to downtown Chanhassen, the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and the Lake Minnetonka RegionalTrail.Many local trail systems connect to the trail corridor and the trail will create links to popular parks and will fulfil asegment of the Regional Trail Search Corridor as identified by the Metropolitan Council.Carver County spent a significant amount of time researching the corridor with the assistance of a Project Steering Committee and seeking public comments through open houses, pop­up events, press releases, online surveys, and websites. The proposed trail is separated into six segments for purposes of location and cost estimates. The total cost for all six segments is $6,014,884 in today’s dollars. The first segment planned for construction is Segment #2, which is from Minnewashta Parkway to Century Boulevard through the Arboretum. The proposed cost of this segment is $2,547,430. Carver County will be submitting grant applications for federal and state dollars to help pay for this project. To apply for these grants, an approved Master Plan must be completed by the applying organization. Generally, the same process requires the organization to seek Resolutions or Letters of Support from neighboring communities.  RECOMMENDATION On December 12, 2017, Commissioner Kelly moved and Commissioner Boettcher seconded that the Chanhassen Park and Recreation Commission recommend that the City Council approve a resolution supporting the TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan prepared by Carver County.All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 8 to 0. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Support 2. Letter from Martin Walsh, Carver County Parks dated November 14, 2017 3. Map of Primary Service Area 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: ___________ RESOLUTION NO: _____________ MOTION BY: __________ SECONDED BY: ________ A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE TH 5 REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, Carver County is an implementing regional park and trail agency of the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, Carver County proposes a regional trail master plan consistent with the Highway 5 Regional Trail Search Corridor of the Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed regional trail master plan is consistent with the city’s plan for trails. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chanhassen hereby supports the TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this XXth day of January, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT TH 5 Regional Trail Master Plan8+¢?©A@?ûA@?«A@G°WXG°WXG³WX?©A@Eden PrairieEden PrairieExcelsiorExcelsiorMinnetonkaMinnetonkaMinnetristaMinnetristaShorewoodShorewoodTonka BayTonka BayChanhassenChanhassenChaskaChaskaVictoriaVictoriaHoliday,LakeRose,LakeL o tu s L akeLucy,LakeDuckLakeAnn,LakeRoundLakeMitchellLakeSusanLakeRiceMarshLakeRed RocLakeHazeltine LakeRiley LakeBavaria,LakeRiceLakeGrassLakeLake MinnetonkaChristmasLakeStoneLakeVirginia,LakeZumbra,LakeMinnewashta,LakeSchutzLakeStiegerLakeAuburn,LakeWassermannLakeMarshLakeLakeMinnewashtaRegional ParkCarver ParkReserveMinnesotaLandscapeArboretumMinnesotaValley NationalWildlife Refuge[012MilesPlanned TrailsRegional TrailsCore Service Area (.5 miles)Primary Service Area (2 miles)Proposed Regional Trail CorridorGreen SpaceAudubon Rd Galpin BlvdHazeltine BlvdLake Minnetonka LRT Regional TrailMinnesota River Bluffs Regional LRT TrailDell RdPowers BlvdMinnewashta PkwyFigure 4: Primary Service Area CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­12: Accept Donation from the Chanhassen Athletic Association for Lake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.9. Prepared By Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director File No: RA­ 111 (Lake Susan Park, General) PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council accepts a donation of $38,000 from the Chanhassen Athletic Association for contribution to a ball field lighting project at Lake Susan Park. Furthermore, staff is directed to prepare correspondence from the Mayor and City Council thanking the Chanhassen Athletic Association for this generous donation.” Council approval requires a . BACKGROUND The Chanhassen Athletic Association (CAA) would like to donate $55,000 to the City of Chanhassen to finance a portion of a project that would install baseball field lighting at Lake Susan Park. The association would like to propose a two­installment payment. The first payment would be made in 2018 ($38,000). The second payment would be made in 2019 ($17,000).  All donations exceeding $500 must be approved by the City Council. DISCUSSION The CAA is a parent/adult­led organization that has successfully administered youth sports programs within the community for over 40 years. The association has partnered with the city on many occasions to work towards improving local athletic facilities. The association would like to make this donation to assist the city in a project that increases the capacity of the Lake Susan Park baseball field to host games through the installation of athletic field lighting. In the event that the proposed project proceeds, the lighting equipment purchased and installed becomes the sole property of the City of Chanhassen and the donation includes no preferential treatment for the athletic association in future scheduling of the facility.  RECOMMENDATION CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­12: Accept Donation from the Chanhassen Athletic Association for Lake SusanPark Ballfield LightingSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.9.Prepared By Todd Hoffman, Park and RecreationDirector File No: RA­ 111 (Lake Susan Park, General)PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council accepts a donation of $38,000 from the Chanhassen Athletic Association forcontribution to a ball field lighting project at Lake Susan Park.Furthermore, staff is directed to prepare correspondence from the Mayor and City Council thanking the ChanhassenAthletic Association for this generous donation.”Council approval requires a .BACKGROUNDThe Chanhassen Athletic Association (CAA) would like to donate $55,000 to the City of Chanhassen to finance aportion of a project that would install baseball field lighting at Lake Susan Park. The association would like to proposea two­installment payment. The first payment would be made in 2018 ($38,000). The second payment would bemade in 2019 ($17,000). All donations exceeding $500 must be approved by the City Council.DISCUSSIONThe CAA is a parent/adult­led organization that has successfully administered youth sports programs within thecommunity for over 40 years. The association has partnered with the city on many occasions to work towardsimproving local athletic facilities.The association would like to make this donation to assist the city in a project that increases the capacity of the LakeSusan Park baseball field to host games through the installation of athletic field lighting. In the event that the proposedproject proceeds, the lighting equipment purchased and installed becomes the sole property of the City of Chanhassenand the donation includes no preferential treatment for the athletic association in future scheduling of the facility.  RECOMMENDATION On September 26, 2017, the Park and Recreation Commission recommended that the City Council approve a 2018 capital improvement program item for Lake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting.  Furthermore, that a donation of $55,000 from the Chanhassen Athletic Association be accepted on an agreed payment plan to assist with payment of the lights. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Donation Agreement 2. Resolution 1 195792v1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN RESTRICTED DONATION AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _____ day of ____________, 2018 by and between the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation (“City”), whose address is 7700 Market Boulevard, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, and the Chanhassen Athletic Association, a Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation (“Donor”), whose mailing address is P.O. Box 113, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants the parties agree as follows: 1. APPROVAL. This Agreement is contingent upon the City Council adopting a resolution pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 accepting the donation subject to the terms of this Agreement. 2. DONATION. The Donor donates $55,000 to the City for the purchase and installation by the City of LED baseball field lighting at Lake Susan Park in Chanhassen (“Project”). The Donor shall make an initial payment to the City of $38,000 when the City solicits bids for the Project and the balance of $17,000 on or before March 1, 2019. If the City in its sole discretion decides not to proceed with the Project, the City will return any donated funds the City has received pursuant to this Agreement to the Donor. 3. NAMING. A plaque will be installed by the City adjacent to the installation to recognize the donation. 4. MAINTENANCE. The Project shall be maintained by the City of Chanhassen. Maintenance includes regular inspection, cleaning and minor repairs. 5. DECOMMISSIONING. The Project may be decommissioned based on the following reasons at the City’s discretion: a. The Project has reached the end of its useful life. b. The Project is damaged to a point where repair becomes financially burdensome to the City. 2 195792v1 c. The City Council determines that the site is needed for another public use. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: ___________________________ Denny Laufenburger, Mayor AND __________________________ Todd Gerhardt, City Manager CHANHASSEN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION BY: ___________________________ Name: _____________________ Title: ______________________ CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: January 22, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM CHANHASSEN ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL hereby accepts the $38,000 donation from the Chanhassen Athletic Association for contribution to a ball field lighting project at Lake Susan Park. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that city staff is hereby directed to prepare a letter to the Chanhassen Athletic Association thanking them for their contribution. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of January, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­13: Approve Application for Funding from the Carver County Community Development Agency Community Growth Partnership Initiative Program for Rosemount, Inc., a subsidiary of Emerson Electric Co. Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.10. Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Manager File No: GEN 128C PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution approving application for funding from the Carver County Community Development Agency Community Growth Partnership Initiative Program for Rosemount, Inc., a subsidiary of Emerson Electric Co.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND Rosemount, Inc., a subsidiary of Emerson Electric Co., is currently expanding business operations in Chanhassen. This is one of three facilities located in Minnesota, with the other two located in Shakopee and Eden Prairie. Rosemount, Inc. plans to invest $14 million in order to rehabilitate the current Chanhassen facility to increase capacity and optimize the office and manufacturing space mix. While Rosemount, Inc. is already one of Chanhassen’s largest employers with an estimated 789 current employees, an anticipated 60 new jobs will be brought to Chanhassen over the next 18 months as a result of the upgrades. The average annual salary for these full­time benefit eligible positions is estimated to be $56,000. The project began in 2017 and is expected to be fully complete by 2020.  To assist with this $14 million project, Rosemount, Inc. made application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development’s (DEED) Job Creation Fund (JCF) and the Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF). These applications were brought forward to City Council on July 10, 2017, and City Council voted unanimously to support these efforts. Rosemount, Inc. has since been awarded funds through both projects.  In addition to assisting with the applications through DEED, staff agreed to submit an application to the Carver County Community Development Agency for a $60,000 grant based on the significant financial investment and creation of new jobs in Chanhassen. If approved by City Council, staff would apply for funds available through the Community Growth Partnership Initiative Program. There are three categories that are available for funding: 1) Affordable Housing 2) Community Development 3) Redevelopment CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­13: Approve Application for Funding from the Carver County CommunityDevelopment Agency Community Growth Partnership Initiative Program for Rosemount, Inc., asubsidiary of Emerson Electric Co.Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.10.Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant CityManager File No: GEN 128CPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution approving application for funding from the Carver County CommunityDevelopment Agency Community Growth Partnership Initiative Program for Rosemount, Inc., a subsidiary ofEmerson Electric Co.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDRosemount, Inc., a subsidiary of Emerson Electric Co., is currently expanding business operations in Chanhassen. Thisis one of three facilities located in Minnesota, with the other two located in Shakopee and Eden Prairie. Rosemount,Inc. plans to invest $14 million in order to rehabilitate the current Chanhassen facility to increase capacity and optimizethe office and manufacturing space mix. While Rosemount, Inc. is already one of Chanhassen’s largest employers withan estimated 789 current employees, an anticipated 60 new jobs will be brought to Chanhassen over the next 18months as a result of the upgrades. The average annual salary for these full­time benefit eligible positions is estimatedto be $56,000. The project began in 2017 and is expected to be fully complete by 2020. To assist with this $14 million project, Rosemount, Inc. made application to the Minnesota Department of Employmentand Economic Development’s (DEED) Job Creation Fund (JCF) and the Minnesota Investment Fund (MIF). Theseapplications were brought forward to City Council on July 10, 2017, and City Council voted unanimously to supportthese efforts. Rosemount, Inc. has since been awarded funds through both projects. In addition to assisting with the applications through DEED, staff agreed to submit an application to the Carver CountyCommunity Development Agency for a $60,000 grant based on the significant financial investment and creation of newjobs in Chanhassen. If approved by City Council, staff would apply for funds available through the CommunityGrowth Partnership Initiative Program. There are three categories that are available for funding:1) Affordable Housing2) Community Development 3) Redevelopment This project would fall under Community Development. Funds awarded in this category are intended to assist cities in the area of job creation and community development. The cities in Carver County continue to work towards creating “Communities for a Lifetime” and this program is intended to continue that goal.  The current funding cycle deadline is February 1, 2018. If approved, staff will make application for the maximum $60,000 on behalf of Rosemount, Inc. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council adopt the attached resolution of support for the application for funding from Carver County Community Development Agency Community Growth Partnership Initiative Program for Rosemount, Inc. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: January 22, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018- MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE CARVER COUNTY CDA COMMUNITY GROWTH PARTNERSHIOP INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Chanhassen has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the Carver County Community Development Agency (CDA) Community Growth Partnership Incentive Grant program’s purposes and criteria; and WHEREAS, the City has identified a project that qualifies under the Community Development category; and WHEREAS, the City has the capability and capacity to ensure the proposed project be completed and administered within the Redevelopment Incentive Grant program guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance; and WHEREAS, the City is supportive of affordable housing and of the CDA’s mission, to improve the lives of Carver County residents through affordable housing and community development. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Chanhassen approves the application for funding from the Carver County CDA Community Growth Partnership Incentive Grant program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the Carver County CDA, Mayor Denny Laufenburger is hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to receive and use the funding for the proposed project. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 22nd day of January, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­14: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Project Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.11. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No:  PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council awards a construction contract for the 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) project to Hydro­Klean, LLC in the amount of $373,591.95.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The Metropolitan Council monitors the flow of sanitary sewer from each city to determine the amount of inflow and infiltration (I/I) to their treatment plant. If a city exceeds the allowance set by the Metropolitan Council, the city is surcharged a fee based on the amount of flow above the allowed amount. The project is similar to last year’s project but tailored to the areas identified to be addressed this year. The City of Chanhassen has chosen to participate in the Metropolitan Council’s ongoing I/I reduction program. The program’s aim is to encourage communities to rehabilitate their sanitary sewer systems and reduce I/I on a local level. Through this program, the city may forgo the surcharge fee so long as they are investing the funds in I/I prevention in the sanitary sewer system. DISCUSSION The 2017 I/I project is designed to help prevent I/I from entering the sanitary sewer system. The project consists of rehabilitating aged vitrified clay pipe with a cured­in­place lining material for longer manhole­to­manhole sections, spot repairing other deteriorated pipe with a cured­in­place lining method, and grouting other spot leaks at pipe joints and manhole sections. The areas prioritized to be rehabilitated this year include the street in the reconstruction and rehabilitation projects originally planned to be completed in 2018, as well as the Chan View and Park Road sewershed areas. The Chan View area is the last major area within the city where vitrified clay pipe remains that has not been addressed by previous rehabilitation projects. BID RESULTS CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­14: Accept Bids and Award Contract for the 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I/I)ProjectSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.11.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council awards a construction contract for the 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) project to Hydro­Klean,LLC in the amount of $373,591.95.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe Metropolitan Council monitors the flow of sanitary sewer from each city to determine the amount of inflow andinfiltration (I/I) to their treatment plant. If a city exceeds the allowance set by the Metropolitan Council, the city issurcharged a fee based on the amount of flow above the allowed amount. The project is similar to last year’s projectbut tailored to the areas identified to be addressed this year.The City of Chanhassen has chosen to participate in the Metropolitan Council’s ongoing I/I reduction program. Theprogram’s aim is to encourage communities to rehabilitate their sanitary sewer systems and reduce I/I on a local level.Through this program, the city may forgo the surcharge fee so long as they are investing the funds in I/I prevention inthe sanitary sewer system.DISCUSSIONThe 2017 I/I project is designed to help prevent I/I from entering the sanitary sewer system. The project consists ofrehabilitating aged vitrified clay pipe with a cured­in­place lining material for longer manhole­to­manhole sections, spotrepairing other deteriorated pipe with a cured­in­place lining method, and grouting other spot leaks at pipe joints andmanhole sections.The areas prioritized to be rehabilitated this year include the street in the reconstruction and rehabilitation projectsoriginally planned to be completed in 2018, as well as the Chan View and Park Road sewershed areas. The ChanView area is the last major area within the city where vitrified clay pipe remains that has not been addressed byprevious rehabilitation projects. BID RESULTS This project bid opening was on January 25, 2018. Six bids were received. Hydro­Klean, LLC submitted the low bid in the amount of $371,751.95. During the subsequent follow­up, a tabulation error was found in the bid submitted by Hydro­Klean, LLC. The corrected bid amount is $373,591.95. The city’s standard General Conditions indicate an award shall be based on a corrected tabulation. This tabulation irregularity was communicated to the City Attorney and he concurred with the assessment to award based on the corrected bid amount.  The bid results are as follows: Contractor Total Bid Amount Hydro­Klean, LLC $373,591.95 (corrected value) Visu­Sewer $388,910.00 Lametti & Sons $399,475.00 Michels Corporation $427,452.50 Insituform $459,490.10 Veit $514,300.00 Engineer’s Estimate $347,935.50 The Engineer’s Estimate was $347,935.50 for the project. The low bid amount  is slightly over (6%) the Engineer’s Estimate.  The contractor (Visu­Sewer, Inc.) that was selected to perform the work for the 2017 I/I project came in second. Hydro­Klean, LLC has completed work in Chanhassen in the past and their work was acceptable. Hydro­Klean, LLC previously acquired a company named InfraTech that specializes in this type of work .  Funding for the project is proposed from the Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund and was budgeted in the 2018 CIP #SS­ 014 & SS­012. The work is defined to be completed by September 14, 2018. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Council award a construction contract for the 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) project to the low bidder, Hydro­Klean LLC, in the amount of $373,591.95. ATTACHMENTS: Bid Summary and Tabulation Resolution Project Area Map CIP Sheets PROJECT: 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Project OWNER: City of Chanhassen CITY PROJECT NO.: 17-04 Bids Opened: Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 2:00 pm Contractor Bid Security (5%) Add. No. 1 Rec'd.Grand Total Bid Corrected Total Bid 1 Hydro-Klean X X $371,751.95 $373,591.95 2 Visu-Sewer X X $388,910.00 3 Lametti & Sons X X $399,475.00 4 Michels Corporation X X $427,452.50 5 Insituform X X $459,490.10 6 Veit X X $514,300.00 Engineer's Opinion of Cost (Includes 10% Contingency) $386,595.00 Denotes corrected value Assistant City Engineer I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on January 25, 2018. BID TABULATION SUMMARY George Bender, PE BID TABULATIONUnit PriceCostUnit PriceCostUnit PriceCostUnit PriceCostUnit PriceCostUnit PriceCostUnit PriceCost1Mobilization1$9,805.00$9,805.00$2,815.00$2,815.00$20,000.00$20,000.00$24,350.00$24,350.00$7,496.70$7,496.70$23,000.00$23,000.00$15,000.00$15,000.002Grout Joint (All Sizes)20$558.00$11,160.00$530.00$10,600.00$850.00$17,000.00$533.00$10,660.00$453.80$9,076.00$475.00$9,500.00$700.00$14,000.003Grout MH5$488.00$2,440.00$1,290.00$6,450.00$1,000.00$5,000.00$1,156.00$5,780.00$211.60$1,058.00$225.00$1,125.00$500.00$2,500.004Grout Service Wye (EA)30$535.00$16,050.00$450.00$13,500.00$300.00$9,000.00$711.00$21,330.00$496.10$14,883.00$515.00$15,450.00$500.00$15,000.005Chemical Grout550$20.00$11,000.00$10.00$5,500.00$20.00$11,000.00$11.00$6,050.00$31.20$17,160.00$30.00$16,500.00$10.00$5,500.0068" Cured-in-Place System9$1,246.00$11,214.00$525.00$4,725.00$1,300.00$11,700.00$1,460.00$13,140.00$1,318.10$11,862.90$1,650.00$14,850.00$450.00$4,050.00710" Cured-in-Place System27$1,132.33$30,572.91$1,060.00$28,620.00$1,400.00$37,800.00$1,515.00$40,905.00$1,197.80$32,340.60$1,725.00$46,575.00$500.00$13,500.00812” Cured-in-Place System15$1,337.44$20,061.60$1,160.00$17,400.00$1,500.00$22,500.00$1,515.00$22,725.00$1,414.80$21,222.00$1,725.00$25,875.00$600.00$9,000.00921” Cured-in-Place System12$2,587.00$31,044.00$1,725.00$20,700.00$1,600.00$19,200.00$1,920.00$23,040.00$2,736.60$32,839.20$2,175.00$26,100.00$1,700.00$20,400.001024" Cured-in-Place System (LF)9$3,019.66$27,176.94$1,725.00$15,525.00$1,700.00$15,300.00$2,425.00$21,825.00$3,194.30$28,748.70$2,750.00$24,750.00$2,000.00$18,000.00118" VCP Long Liner (LF)4200$18.80$78,960.00$23.50$98,700.00$27.50$115,500.00$22.25$93,450.00$23.10$97,020.00$25.00$105,000.00$25.00$105,000.001210" VCP Long Liner (LF)450$23.30$10,485.00$43.00$19,350.00$44.00$19,800.00$46.50$20,925.00$44.60$20,070.00$37.50$16,875.00$30.00$13,500.001312" DIP Long Liner (LF)400$27.50$11,000.00$42.00$16,800.00$32.00$12,800.00$44.50$17,800.00$37.10$14,840.00$41.00$16,400.00$35.00$14,000.001410" ABS Long Liner (LF)375$38.00$14,250.00$43.00$16,125.00$29.00$10,875.00$28.50$10,687.50$28.40$10,650.00$34.00$12,750.00$30.00$11,250.001521" RCP Long Liner (LF)300$69.40$20,820.00$81.50$24,450.00$57.00$17,100.00$77.25$23,175.00$93.20$27,960.00$110.00$33,000.00$80.00$24,000.001624" RCP Long Liner (LF)650$94.80$61,620.00$131.00$85,150.00$66.00$42,900.00$99.00$64,350.00$161.70$105,105.00$187.00$121,550.00$95.00$61,750.0017Traffic Control1$5,932.50$5,932.50$2,500.00$2,500.00$12,000.00$12,000.00$7,260.00$7,260.00$7,158.00$7,158.00$5,000.00$5,000.00$5,000.00$5,000.00TOTAL$373,591.95$388,910.00$399,475.00$427,452.50$459,490.10$514,300.00$351,450.00$35,145.00Denotes Corrected Value$386,595.00Bids Opened: Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 2:00 pmPROJECT: 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) ProjectOWNER: City of ChanhassenCITY PROJECT NUMBER: 17-0410% ContingencyEngineer's Estimate TOTALBidder #2: Visu-SewerBidder #3: Lametti & SonsBidder #4: Michels Bidder #5: Insituform Bidder #6: Veit Engineer's EstimateItem No. ItemBid QuantityBidder #1: Hydro-Klean CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: February 12, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE 2017 INFLOW AND INFILTRATION (I&I) PROJECT NO. 17-04 WHEREAS, pursuant to an ad for bids for the 2017 I&I project, six bids were received and opened. The bids are as follows: Contractor Total Bid Amount Hydro-Klean, LLC $373,591.95 (corrected value) Visu-Sewer $388,910.00 Lametti & Sons $399,475.00 Michels Corporation $427,452.50 Insituform $459,490.10 Veit $514,300.00 Engineer’s Estimate $386,595.00 (with 10% contingency) AND WHEREAS, Hydro-Klean, LLC had the lowest responsible bid with a total bid amount of $373,591.95. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Chanhassen City Council: 1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Hydro- Klean, LLC in the name of the City of Chanhassen for the 2017 Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Project No. 17-04, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 12th day of February, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT Lotus Lake Lake Riley Lake Minnewashta Lake Lucy Rice Lake Lake S usa n LakeAnn Lake Virginia LakeHarrison R iceMarshLa ke Clasen Lake Lak e St Jo e Ch ristmasLake Lyman Blv d ( C S AH1 8 ) Lyman Blvd (CSAH 18)Pione e r Trail (C S AH14)(C S A H 6 1 )F ly in g C lo u dD rivePowersBlvd(C.R.17)AudubonRoad(CSAH15)State Highway101Hwy 1 0 1GreatPlainsBlvd Hwy 101Great P l a insBlvdState Hwy 5 State Hwy 5Arboretum Boulevard Highway 41GalpinBlvd.(C.R.117)State Hwy 5State H w y 7Hazeltine Blvd (Hwy 41)Chanhassen Rd. Hwy. 101AudubonRoad(C S A H 61 )F ly in g C lo u d D rMinnewashtaPkwyGalpinBlvd(C.R.15)£¤212 £¤212 £¤212 PowersBlvd(C.R.17Bluff Creek DrBluffCreekBlvdOrchard Lane Park Road 1 Park Road 2 Chan View Lake Drive East City of Chan hassen2017 I&I Project Areas Project Areasµ 1/9/2018 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­15: 1650 Motorplex Court­Subdivision Request and Conditional Use Permit Amendment Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.12. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case #2018­05 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the Registered Land Survey creating three parcels, and the amendment to the conditional use permit for development within the Bluff Creek corridor subject to the conditions of the staff report, and adopts the Findings of Fact.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The applicant is creating three tracts of land from one large parcel. Due to the subdivision of the property, the existing Conditional Use Permit approved for the development of the site must be amended.  The applicant had been trying to comply with the conditions of approval for Planning Case #2015­19 by dedicating the Bluff Creek Primary Zone to the City of Chanhassen.  Carver County required that the property owner prepare a Registered Land Survey in order to convey the property to the City. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 16, 2018 to hear the proposed development application.  The Planning Commission voted 4 ­ 0 to recommend approval of the Registered Land Survey and amended Conditional Use Permit.  There were no issues or concerns with the proposal. The Planning Commission minutes for January 16, 2018, are  a consent agenda item in the February 12, 2018 City Council agenda packet. DISCUSSION The applicant attempted to meet the conditions of approval from 2015 by transferring the Bluff Creek Overlay District to the city, which the city would attach to the land it owns along Bluff Creek. However, Carver County would not permit the transfer of the property without proceeding through the Registered Land Survey process.  In subdividing the property, the applicant is then required to amend the Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­15: 1650 Motorplex Court­Subdivision Request and Conditional Use PermitAmendmentSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.12.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case #2018­05PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the Registered Land Survey creating three parcels, and the amendment to theconditional use permit for development within the Bluff Creek corridor subject to the conditions of the staff report,and adopts the Findings of Fact.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe applicant is creating three tracts of land from one large parcel. Due to the subdivision of the property, the existingConditional Use Permit approved for the development of the site must be amended.  The applicant had been trying tocomply with the conditions of approval for Planning Case #2015­19 by dedicating the Bluff Creek Primary Zone tothe City of Chanhassen.  Carver County required that the property owner prepare a Registered Land Survey in orderto convey the property to the City.BACKGROUNDThe Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 16, 2018 to hear the proposed development application.  ThePlanning Commission voted 4 ­ 0 to recommend approval of the Registered Land Survey and amended Conditional UsePermit.  There were no issues or concerns with the proposal.The Planning Commission minutes for January 16, 2018, are  a consent agenda item in the February 12, 2018 CityCouncil agenda packet.DISCUSSIONThe applicant attempted to meet the conditions of approval from 2015 by transferring the Bluff Creek Overlay Districtto the city, which the city would attach to the land it owns along Bluff Creek. However, Carver County would notpermit the transfer of the property without proceeding through the Registered Land Survey process.  In subdividing theproperty, the applicant is then required to amend the Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the resolution approving the Registered Land Survey creating three parcels, and the amended Conditional Use Permit for development in the Bluff Creek Corridor subject to the following conditions: Conditional Use Permit: 1. Development must comply with the Bluff Creek Corridor regulations. 2. Tract A, Registered Land Survey containing the Bluff Creek Overlay District shall be dedicated to the city. Subdivision : 1. Provide the City of Chanhassen with a copy of the current access and maintenance agreement for Motorplex Court. 2. Access to Tract A shall be included as part of the current access and maintenance agreement for Motorplex Court. 3. Identify and provide a Drainage and Utility easement over the publicly owned piping on the site. 4. Dedicate Tract A to the City of Chanhassen. And adopt the Planning Commission Findings of Fact. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Registered Land Survey Amended Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Staff Report Dated January 16, 2018 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: RESOLUTION NO: MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY for J & R PROPERTIES, LLC WHEREAS, J & R have requested a subdivision of the property into three lots; and WHEREAS, the Chanhassen Planning Commission held a hearing on January 16, 2018, and found the plan consistent with the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the need for the Registered Land Survey is so that the property owner may convey a parcel to the City of Chanhassen. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby approves the Registered Land Survey No. , Carver County, Minnesota, subject to the following conditions: Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 12th day February of 2018. 2 ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Clerk/Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT g:\plan\2018 planning cases\18-05 - 1651 motorplex ct - subdivision\resolution registered land survy.doc 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2015-19 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: For the LaMettry Collision & Glass project to develop within the Bluff Creek Overlay District and to permit two principal structures on one parcel. 2. Property. The permit is for the following-described property located at 1650 and 1651 Motorplex Court ("subject property") in the City of Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota: See Exhibit A 3. Conditions. The permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a. Development must comply with the Bluff Creek Corridor regulations.. b. Tract A, Registered Land Survey containing the Bluff Creek Overlay District shall be dedicated to the city. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: February 12, 2018 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2 By: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (SEAL) By: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th day of February, 2018, by Denny Laufenburger Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 3 EXHIBIT A CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Mission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans & Specifications Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13. Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner; George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07 PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plans dated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; and The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; and The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Final Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, and southwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available to the site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story senior housing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectMission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &SpecificationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner;George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plansdated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYFinal Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, andsouthwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available tothe site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story seniorhousing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings. BACKGROUND On May 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion: Subdivision “The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rd Addition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation,subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000 Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000 Total $478,000 Finding:This condition still applies. Engineering Conditions : 1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69.These shall be due with the final plat. Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46.  This fee is due with the final plat.” 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.This plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.” 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against the property. Finding :  This condition still applies. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs. Finding :  This condition still applies. Planning Conditions: 1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit (LUP) resolution and Site Plan application.” Finding :  This condition has been met. The final plat contains one lot which is consistent with the preliminary plat. FINAL PLAT The applicant is requesting final plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot.  Lot 1 is proposed to house a senior living CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectMission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &SpecificationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner;George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plansdated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYFinal Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, andsouthwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available tothe site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story seniorhousing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings.BACKGROUNDOnMay 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion:Subdivision“The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rdAddition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact andRecommendation,subject to the following conditions:Park and Trail Conditions1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition ofapproval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final platsubmission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling,$5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000.Unit Type No. of Units Amount TotalIndependent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000Total$478,000Finding:This condition still applies.Engineering Conditions :1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69.These shall be due with the final plat.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46. This fee is due with the final plat.”2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection andpreservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water qualitybenefit in perpetuity.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The applicant must prepare an operations andmaintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater bestmanagement practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.Thisplan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.”3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against theproperty.Finding :  This condition still applies.4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs.Finding :  This condition still applies.Planning Conditions:1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit(LUP) resolution and Site Plan application.”Finding :  This condition has been met.The final plat contains one lot which is consistent with the preliminary plat.FINAL PLAT The applicant is requesting final plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot.  Lot 1 is proposed to house a senior living apartment with a daycare building, and eight twinhomes.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use District and is located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86th Street.  Sewer and water are available to the site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86 th Street. The ordinance states, “All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by the zoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontage on a public street.” The lot has street frontage.  Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of 86 th Street. The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions. Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. SITE CONSTRAINTS Wetland Protection The City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of any wetlands on the subject property.A review of historic aerial photographs and on­site observations supports the conclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property. Bluff Protection There are no bluffs on the property. Shoreland Management A significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan.The development was required to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules.This includes having a minimum of 50% preserved as green space; the applicant is proposing just over 53%.In addition, the applicant must meet the minimum standards for stormwater management and erosion prevention.A stormwater management plan and an erosion prevention and sediment control plan have been provided.By meeting the requirements of the City and the Watershed District, the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectMission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &SpecificationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner;George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plansdated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYFinal Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, andsouthwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available tothe site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story seniorhousing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings.BACKGROUNDOnMay 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion:Subdivision“The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rdAddition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact andRecommendation,subject to the following conditions:Park and Trail Conditions1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition ofapproval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final platsubmission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling,$5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000.Unit Type No. of Units Amount TotalIndependent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000Total$478,000Finding:This condition still applies.Engineering Conditions :1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69.These shall be due with the final plat.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46. This fee is due with the final plat.”2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection andpreservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water qualitybenefit in perpetuity.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The applicant must prepare an operations andmaintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater bestmanagement practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.Thisplan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.”3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against theproperty.Finding :  This condition still applies.4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs.Finding :  This condition still applies.Planning Conditions:1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit(LUP) resolution and Site Plan application.”Finding :  This condition has been met.The final plat contains one lot which is consistent with the preliminary plat.FINAL PLATThe applicant is requesting final plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot.  Lot 1 is proposed to house a senior livingapartment with a daycare building, and eight twinhomes.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use Districtand is located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86th Street.  Sewer and water areavailable to the site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86 th Street.The ordinance states, “All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by thezoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontageon a public street.”The lot has street frontage.  Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of 86 th Street.The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions.Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the ZoningOrdinance.SITE CONSTRAINTSWetland ProtectionThe City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of anywetlands on the subject property.A review of historic aerial photographs and on­site observations supports theconclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property.Bluff ProtectionThere are no bluffs on the property.Shoreland ManagementA significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan.The development wasrequired to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules.This includes having a minimum of 50%preserved as green space; the applicant is proposing just over 53%.In addition, the applicant must meet the minimumstandards for stormwater management and erosion prevention.A stormwater management plan and an erosion prevention and sediment control plan have been provided.By meeting the requirements of the City and the Watershed District, the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards. Floodplain Overlay This property does not lie within a floodplain. Bluff Creek Overlay This property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District. SITE GRADING:DRAINAGE The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) breaks down the planned individual drainage areas across the site.The site has five filtration basins that receive the site drainage from the buildings, parking areas, private streets, and open spaces.Generally the site is planned to drain towards the north to 86 th Street and to the south to the right­ of­way (ROW) for MN TH 212.The side slopes on the western and southern sides match into Carver County’s ROW for CSAH 101 and the MnDOT ROW for TH 212, respectively. The stormwater is treated through the filtration basins.Filtration Basin #5 on the northernmost portion of the parcel connects a small drain tile to the city’s stormwater drainage system at the intersection of 86 th and Great Plains Boulevard (CSAH 101).Filtration Basin #1 has an outlet structure designed to overflow stormwater from the basin to the pipe on the southern boundary of the site that connects to the MnDOT stormwater system for TH 212.Filtration Basin #2 also discharges to the same stormwater pipe on the southern side of the site that connects to MnDOT’s system. Stormwater is collected by two underground tanks prior to conveyance into Filtration Basins #1 and #2 for water reuse purposed for site irrigation. The proposed plan provides for on­site treatment for the stormwater except where the side slopes match in to the MnDOT and County right­of­way. Any stormwater discharge to MnDOT’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting their conditions of approval and completion of their permit requirements. Any stormwater discharge to Carver County’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting their conditions of approval and completion of their permit requirements. SITE GRADING:EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL An erosion control plan consistent with Section 19­145 of city code has been included in the construction plans.This development exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit.The NPDES construction permit must be granted to the applicant prior to any earth­disturbing activities. Stockpile locations shall be planned and indicated on the grading and erosion control plan sheets or the SWPPP. RETAINING WALLS The developer is proposing two retaining walls on the site.One is in the southwestern portion of the site adjacent to the west end of the main building, and the other is located on the north end of the site adjacent to the twin home nearest to Filtration Basin #5. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction:smooth face, poured­in­place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.Walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock.Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. The southern wall is approximately 110 feet long, with a maximum height of 3.2 feet. The northern retaining wall is approximately 190 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet.This wall wraps around the northernmost twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5. TRAFFIC STUDY CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectMission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &SpecificationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner;George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plansdated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYFinal Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, andsouthwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available tothe site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story seniorhousing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings.BACKGROUNDOnMay 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion:Subdivision“The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rdAddition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact andRecommendation,subject to the following conditions:Park and Trail Conditions1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition ofapproval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final platsubmission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling,$5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000.Unit Type No. of Units Amount TotalIndependent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000Total$478,000Finding:This condition still applies.Engineering Conditions :1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69.These shall be due with the final plat.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46. This fee is due with the final plat.”2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection andpreservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water qualitybenefit in perpetuity.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The applicant must prepare an operations andmaintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater bestmanagement practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.Thisplan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.”3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against theproperty.Finding :  This condition still applies.4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs.Finding :  This condition still applies.Planning Conditions:1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit(LUP) resolution and Site Plan application.”Finding :  This condition has been met.The final plat contains one lot which is consistent with the preliminary plat.FINAL PLATThe applicant is requesting final plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot.  Lot 1 is proposed to house a senior livingapartment with a daycare building, and eight twinhomes.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use Districtand is located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86th Street.  Sewer and water areavailable to the site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86 th Street.The ordinance states, “All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by thezoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontageon a public street.”The lot has street frontage.  Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of 86 th Street.The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions.Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the ZoningOrdinance.SITE CONSTRAINTSWetland ProtectionThe City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of anywetlands on the subject property.A review of historic aerial photographs and on­site observations supports theconclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property.Bluff ProtectionThere are no bluffs on the property.Shoreland ManagementA significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan.The development wasrequired to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules.This includes having a minimum of 50%preserved as green space; the applicant is proposing just over 53%.In addition, the applicant must meet the minimumstandards for stormwater management and erosion prevention.A stormwater management plan and an erosionprevention and sediment control plan have been provided.By meeting the requirements of the City and the WatershedDistrict, the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards.Floodplain OverlayThis property does not lie within a floodplain.Bluff Creek OverlayThis property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.SITE GRADING:DRAINAGEThe Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) breaks down the planned individual drainage areas across thesite.The site has five filtration basins that receive the site drainage from the buildings, parking areas, private streets,and open spaces.Generally the site is planned to drain towards the north to 86 th Street and to the south to the right­of­way (ROW) for MN TH 212.The side slopes on the western and southern sides match into Carver County’sROW for CSAH 101 and the MnDOT ROW for TH 212, respectively.The stormwater is treated through the filtration basins.Filtration Basin #5 on the northernmost portion of the parcelconnects a small drain tile to the city’s stormwater drainage system at the intersection of 86 th and Great PlainsBoulevard (CSAH 101).Filtration Basin #1 has an outlet structure designed to overflow stormwater from the basin tothe pipe on the southern boundary of the site that connects to the MnDOT stormwater system for TH 212.FiltrationBasin #2 also discharges to the same stormwater pipe on the southern side of the site that connects to MnDOT’ssystem.Stormwater is collected by two underground tanks prior to conveyance into Filtration Basins #1 and #2 for waterreuse purposed for site irrigation.The proposed plan provides for on­site treatment for the stormwater except where the side slopes match in to theMnDOT and County right­of­way.Any stormwater discharge to MnDOT’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting their conditionsof approval and completion of their permit requirements.Any stormwater discharge to Carver County’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting theirconditions of approval and completion of their permit requirements.SITE GRADING:EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLAn erosion control plan consistent with Section 19­145 of city code has been included in the construction plans.Thisdevelopment exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit.The NPDES construction permit must begranted to the applicant prior to any earth­disturbing activities. Stockpile locations shall be planned and indicated on thegrading and erosion control plan sheets or the SWPPP.RETAINING WALLSThe developer is proposing two retaining walls on the site.One is in the southwestern portion of the site adjacent tothe west end of the main building, and the other is located on the north end of the site adjacent to the twin homenearest to Filtration Basin #5.The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction:smooth face, poured­in­place concrete(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.Walls taller than six feet shall not beconstructed with boulder rock.Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed inthe state of Minnesota.The southern wall is approximately 110 feet long, with a maximum height of 3.2 feet.The northern retaining wall is approximately 190 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet.This wall wraps aroundthe northernmost twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5. TRAFFIC STUDY The developer commissioned a traffic study to determine what impacts the proposed development would create compared with not developing the land.The results of the study show that the intersections of CSAH 101 and Lake Susan Drive, CSAH 101 and West 86th Street, and West 86th Street and Mission Hills Drive would have a negligible change in Level of Service, and all the studied intersections would function at acceptable levels. The city has been contacted by the Mission Hills Gardens Homeowners Association.This HOA is located nearby on the north side of West 86th Street.The two letters staff has received are included in this report.From these letters and a discussion with their Vice­President, the HOA’s main concern is with not an increase in delay from traffic, but the safety of the left turn from West 86th Street onto the CSAH 101 intersection design as it exists today. CSAH 101 is a county road, and for that reason Carver County has jurisdiction over any changes to the intersection of CSAH 101 and West 86th Street.City staff has contacted the county to notify them of the residents’ concern in the area.From MnDOT crash data, there has not been a reported accident at the intersection of CSAH 101 & West 86th Street within the past five years; therefore, it may not be a high priority for a county safety improvement project. Staff also received notice that residents were concerned about the visibility around West 86th Street curves when cars are parked on that street.The developer’s traffic engineer indicated that the proposed development is not expected to generate additional parking on West 86th Street due to three on­site parking lots.Staff has followed up on this issue outside of the development review process.The follow­up resulted in the City Council approving a “No Parking” ordinance for a portion of West 86th Street at the February 23, 2015 meeting. STREETS The proposed plan consists of two private streets, Oriole Lane and Oriole Drive, to provide access to the eight twin homes and the main building and parking lots. Staff had multiple discussions with the developer regarding the naming of the streets.There is already a street named Oriole Avenue in the city.The developer has previously agreed to modify the street names to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive.These streets shall be renamed as a condition of approval . The developer’s engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7­ton design. The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their design: Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping and signing. When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in the MUTCD.In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internal roadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion. Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiate internal roadways. The raised median has been modified at the West 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and re­striping along West 86th Street was addressed to help delineate the travel/turn lanes. PARKING & WALKWAYS The site plan includes two parking lots for the main building and a small parking lot for the twin homes.The parking lot aisle of the twin home is 24 feet wide; either the aisle must be revised to 26 feet, or the parking spaces must be 20 feet long.The turnaround for the dead­end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet. The plan set includes turning movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building. The driveways entering the parking lots for the main building appear to accommodate the fire truck turning movement. The plans include sidewalks and trails throughout the property.Trails and sidewalks must be constructed per the most current city standard detail plates and specification.The pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectMission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &SpecificationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner;George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plansdated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYFinal Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, andsouthwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available tothe site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story seniorhousing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings.BACKGROUNDOnMay 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion:Subdivision“The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rdAddition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact andRecommendation,subject to the following conditions:Park and Trail Conditions1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition ofapproval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final platsubmission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling,$5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000.Unit Type No. of Units Amount TotalIndependent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000Total$478,000Finding:This condition still applies.Engineering Conditions :1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69.These shall be due with the final plat.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46. This fee is due with the final plat.”2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection andpreservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water qualitybenefit in perpetuity.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The applicant must prepare an operations andmaintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater bestmanagement practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.Thisplan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.”3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against theproperty.Finding :  This condition still applies.4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs.Finding :  This condition still applies.Planning Conditions:1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit(LUP) resolution and Site Plan application.”Finding :  This condition has been met.The final plat contains one lot which is consistent with the preliminary plat.FINAL PLATThe applicant is requesting final plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot.  Lot 1 is proposed to house a senior livingapartment with a daycare building, and eight twinhomes.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use Districtand is located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86th Street.  Sewer and water areavailable to the site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86 th Street.The ordinance states, “All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by thezoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontageon a public street.”The lot has street frontage.  Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of 86 th Street.The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions.Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the ZoningOrdinance.SITE CONSTRAINTSWetland ProtectionThe City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of anywetlands on the subject property.A review of historic aerial photographs and on­site observations supports theconclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property.Bluff ProtectionThere are no bluffs on the property.Shoreland ManagementA significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan.The development wasrequired to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules.This includes having a minimum of 50%preserved as green space; the applicant is proposing just over 53%.In addition, the applicant must meet the minimumstandards for stormwater management and erosion prevention.A stormwater management plan and an erosionprevention and sediment control plan have been provided.By meeting the requirements of the City and the WatershedDistrict, the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards.Floodplain OverlayThis property does not lie within a floodplain.Bluff Creek OverlayThis property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.SITE GRADING:DRAINAGEThe Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) breaks down the planned individual drainage areas across thesite.The site has five filtration basins that receive the site drainage from the buildings, parking areas, private streets,and open spaces.Generally the site is planned to drain towards the north to 86 th Street and to the south to the right­of­way (ROW) for MN TH 212.The side slopes on the western and southern sides match into Carver County’sROW for CSAH 101 and the MnDOT ROW for TH 212, respectively.The stormwater is treated through the filtration basins.Filtration Basin #5 on the northernmost portion of the parcelconnects a small drain tile to the city’s stormwater drainage system at the intersection of 86 th and Great PlainsBoulevard (CSAH 101).Filtration Basin #1 has an outlet structure designed to overflow stormwater from the basin tothe pipe on the southern boundary of the site that connects to the MnDOT stormwater system for TH 212.FiltrationBasin #2 also discharges to the same stormwater pipe on the southern side of the site that connects to MnDOT’ssystem.Stormwater is collected by two underground tanks prior to conveyance into Filtration Basins #1 and #2 for waterreuse purposed for site irrigation.The proposed plan provides for on­site treatment for the stormwater except where the side slopes match in to theMnDOT and County right­of­way.Any stormwater discharge to MnDOT’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting their conditionsof approval and completion of their permit requirements.Any stormwater discharge to Carver County’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting theirconditions of approval and completion of their permit requirements.SITE GRADING:EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLAn erosion control plan consistent with Section 19­145 of city code has been included in the construction plans.Thisdevelopment exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit.The NPDES construction permit must begranted to the applicant prior to any earth­disturbing activities. Stockpile locations shall be planned and indicated on thegrading and erosion control plan sheets or the SWPPP.RETAINING WALLSThe developer is proposing two retaining walls on the site.One is in the southwestern portion of the site adjacent tothe west end of the main building, and the other is located on the north end of the site adjacent to the twin homenearest to Filtration Basin #5.The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction:smooth face, poured­in­place concrete(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.Walls taller than six feet shall not beconstructed with boulder rock.Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed inthe state of Minnesota.The southern wall is approximately 110 feet long, with a maximum height of 3.2 feet.The northern retaining wall is approximately 190 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet.This wall wraps aroundthe northernmost twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5.TRAFFIC STUDYThe developer commissioned a traffic study to determine what impacts the proposed development would createcompared with not developing the land.The results of the study show that the intersections of CSAH 101 and LakeSusan Drive, CSAH 101 and West 86th Street, and West 86th Street and Mission Hills Drive would have a negligiblechange in Level of Service, and all the studied intersections would function at acceptable levels.The city has been contacted by the Mission Hills Gardens Homeowners Association.This HOA is located nearby onthe north side of West 86th Street.The two letters staff has received are included in this report.From these lettersand a discussion with their Vice­President, the HOA’s main concern is with not an increase in delay from traffic, butthe safety of the left turn from West 86th Street onto the CSAH 101 intersection design as it exists today.CSAH 101 is a county road, and for that reason Carver County has jurisdiction over any changes to the intersectionof CSAH 101 and West 86th Street.City staff has contacted the county to notify them of the residents’ concern in thearea.From MnDOT crash data, there has not been a reported accident at the intersection of CSAH 101 & West86thStreet within the past five years; therefore, it may not be a high priority for a county safety improvement project.Staff also received notice that residents were concerned about the visibility around West 86th Street curves when carsare parked on that street.The developer’s traffic engineer indicated that the proposed development is not expected togenerate additional parking on West 86th Street due to three on­site parking lots.Staff has followed up on this issueoutside of the development review process.The follow­up resulted in the City Council approving a “No Parking”ordinance for a portion of West 86th Street at the February 23, 2015 meeting.STREETSThe proposed plan consists of two private streets, Oriole Lane and Oriole Drive, to provide access to the eight twinhomes and the main building and parking lots. Staff had multiple discussions with the developer regarding the namingof the streets.There is already a street named Oriole Avenue in the city.The developer has previously agreed tomodify the street names to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive.These streets shall be renamed as a condition ofapproval . The developer’s engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7­ton design.The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their design:Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping andsigning.When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in theMUTCD.In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internalroadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion.Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiateinternal roadways.The raised median has been modified at the West 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and re­striping alongWest 86th Street was addressed to help delineate the travel/turn lanes.PARKING & WALKWAYSThe site plan includes two parking lots for the main building and a small parking lot for the twin homes.The parkinglot aisle of the twin home is 24 feet wide; either the aisle must be revised to 26 feet, or the parking spaces must be 20feet long.The turnaround for the dead­end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet.The plan set includes turning movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building.The driveways entering the parking lots for the main building appear to accommodate the fire truck turning movement.The plans include sidewalks and trails throughout the property.Trails and sidewalks must be constructed per the most current city standard detail plates and specification.The pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements. WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN:  PRIVATE UTILITIES All water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and must meet the city’s requirements for public utilities.The plans call for 8­inch C900 PVC water main and 8­inch SDR 35 sanitary sewer main to connect to the services stubbed out in the city’s previous utility projects on West 86th Street. The water main crosses a draintile at approximately Station 7+92.This crossing must have an elevation separation of 18 inches. The current plan set shows an approximately 14­foot drop at 90.28% at the connection to the existing sanitary sewer stub for the parcel.The design indicates the use of two elbows to adjust elevation of the sanitary sewer within the site.This elevation adjustment must be created with an inside drop within a sanitary manhole, per the City of Chanhassen standard detail plate. ASSESSMENTS This property was assessed and has paid in full for property assessments for the projects that constructed water main and sanitary sewer main under West 86th Street.Currently, no assessments are owed by this property. This parcel has paid the city for one water and sanitary service hook­up.The existing hook­ups shall be used as a credit for the main building.All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook­up fee at the time of final plat.The remaining hook­up fees would be paid with the building permit. The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the city SAC and WAC fees for the main building. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Article VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards. Section 19­141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/or project proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.”This site will be compliant with the City of Chanhassen’s MS4 permit.Part III D. 5 requires that new developments with a disturbance equal to, or greater than, one (1) acre must have no net­increase from pre­development conditions of stormwater discharge volume, total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorous (TP).The site will also be compliant with the NPDES Construction Permit. The site will fall under the jurisdiction of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) and be subject to their stormwater management rule. The developer must receive all necessary permits and approval from RPBCWD prior to being issued any permits by the city. The proposed best management practices will be privately owned by the property owner.However, as these will discharge to the city’s storm sewer system, the city is required to insure that these function as designed for their life.It is also required under the city’s MS4 permit that we have a mechanism in place to assure proper operations, maintenance and function of the practices.The applicant must provide an operations and maintenance plan to the city for review and approval.The applicant must provide access to city personnel, or their designees to inspect the practices and to require maintenance in the event it is not being adequately performed. This will be included as part of the development contract. The design should follow the MN Stormwater Manual guidelines and recommendations wherever possible to do so. The applicant shall provide justification for any deviations from the guidelines.For instance, it has been staff’s experience that filter socks around drain tile are prone to failure.The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommends bedding the underdrain in #57 stone and using a choker course above the bedding. All basins must have pretreatment of water prior to entering the feature.For those areas where curb cuts serve as the inlet, rip­rap is an effective energy dissipation method reducing the risk of scour; however, it is an ineffective pretreatment method.The online Minnesota Stormwater Manual discusses a variety of pretreatment methods.The CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectMission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &SpecificationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner;George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plansdated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYFinal Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, andsouthwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available tothe site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story seniorhousing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings.BACKGROUNDOnMay 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion:Subdivision“The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rdAddition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact andRecommendation,subject to the following conditions:Park and Trail Conditions1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition ofapproval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final platsubmission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling,$5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000.Unit Type No. of Units Amount TotalIndependent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000Total$478,000Finding:This condition still applies.Engineering Conditions :1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69.These shall be due with the final plat.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46. This fee is due with the final plat.”2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection andpreservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water qualitybenefit in perpetuity.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The applicant must prepare an operations andmaintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater bestmanagement practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.Thisplan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.”3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against theproperty.Finding :  This condition still applies.4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs.Finding :  This condition still applies.Planning Conditions:1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit(LUP) resolution and Site Plan application.”Finding :  This condition has been met.The final plat contains one lot which is consistent with the preliminary plat.FINAL PLATThe applicant is requesting final plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot.  Lot 1 is proposed to house a senior livingapartment with a daycare building, and eight twinhomes.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use Districtand is located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86th Street.  Sewer and water areavailable to the site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86 th Street.The ordinance states, “All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by thezoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontageon a public street.”The lot has street frontage.  Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of 86 th Street.The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions.Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the ZoningOrdinance.SITE CONSTRAINTSWetland ProtectionThe City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of anywetlands on the subject property.A review of historic aerial photographs and on­site observations supports theconclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property.Bluff ProtectionThere are no bluffs on the property.Shoreland ManagementA significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan.The development wasrequired to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules.This includes having a minimum of 50%preserved as green space; the applicant is proposing just over 53%.In addition, the applicant must meet the minimumstandards for stormwater management and erosion prevention.A stormwater management plan and an erosionprevention and sediment control plan have been provided.By meeting the requirements of the City and the WatershedDistrict, the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards.Floodplain OverlayThis property does not lie within a floodplain.Bluff Creek OverlayThis property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.SITE GRADING:DRAINAGEThe Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) breaks down the planned individual drainage areas across thesite.The site has five filtration basins that receive the site drainage from the buildings, parking areas, private streets,and open spaces.Generally the site is planned to drain towards the north to 86 th Street and to the south to the right­of­way (ROW) for MN TH 212.The side slopes on the western and southern sides match into Carver County’sROW for CSAH 101 and the MnDOT ROW for TH 212, respectively.The stormwater is treated through the filtration basins.Filtration Basin #5 on the northernmost portion of the parcelconnects a small drain tile to the city’s stormwater drainage system at the intersection of 86 th and Great PlainsBoulevard (CSAH 101).Filtration Basin #1 has an outlet structure designed to overflow stormwater from the basin tothe pipe on the southern boundary of the site that connects to the MnDOT stormwater system for TH 212.FiltrationBasin #2 also discharges to the same stormwater pipe on the southern side of the site that connects to MnDOT’ssystem.Stormwater is collected by two underground tanks prior to conveyance into Filtration Basins #1 and #2 for waterreuse purposed for site irrigation.The proposed plan provides for on­site treatment for the stormwater except where the side slopes match in to theMnDOT and County right­of­way.Any stormwater discharge to MnDOT’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting their conditionsof approval and completion of their permit requirements.Any stormwater discharge to Carver County’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting theirconditions of approval and completion of their permit requirements.SITE GRADING:EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLAn erosion control plan consistent with Section 19­145 of city code has been included in the construction plans.Thisdevelopment exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit.The NPDES construction permit must begranted to the applicant prior to any earth­disturbing activities. Stockpile locations shall be planned and indicated on thegrading and erosion control plan sheets or the SWPPP.RETAINING WALLSThe developer is proposing two retaining walls on the site.One is in the southwestern portion of the site adjacent tothe west end of the main building, and the other is located on the north end of the site adjacent to the twin homenearest to Filtration Basin #5.The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction:smooth face, poured­in­place concrete(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.Walls taller than six feet shall not beconstructed with boulder rock.Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed inthe state of Minnesota.The southern wall is approximately 110 feet long, with a maximum height of 3.2 feet.The northern retaining wall is approximately 190 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet.This wall wraps aroundthe northernmost twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5.TRAFFIC STUDYThe developer commissioned a traffic study to determine what impacts the proposed development would createcompared with not developing the land.The results of the study show that the intersections of CSAH 101 and LakeSusan Drive, CSAH 101 and West 86th Street, and West 86th Street and Mission Hills Drive would have a negligiblechange in Level of Service, and all the studied intersections would function at acceptable levels.The city has been contacted by the Mission Hills Gardens Homeowners Association.This HOA is located nearby onthe north side of West 86th Street.The two letters staff has received are included in this report.From these lettersand a discussion with their Vice­President, the HOA’s main concern is with not an increase in delay from traffic, butthe safety of the left turn from West 86th Street onto the CSAH 101 intersection design as it exists today.CSAH 101 is a county road, and for that reason Carver County has jurisdiction over any changes to the intersectionof CSAH 101 and West 86th Street.City staff has contacted the county to notify them of the residents’ concern in thearea.From MnDOT crash data, there has not been a reported accident at the intersection of CSAH 101 & West86thStreet within the past five years; therefore, it may not be a high priority for a county safety improvement project.Staff also received notice that residents were concerned about the visibility around West 86th Street curves when carsare parked on that street.The developer’s traffic engineer indicated that the proposed development is not expected togenerate additional parking on West 86th Street due to three on­site parking lots.Staff has followed up on this issueoutside of the development review process.The follow­up resulted in the City Council approving a “No Parking”ordinance for a portion of West 86th Street at the February 23, 2015 meeting.STREETSThe proposed plan consists of two private streets, Oriole Lane and Oriole Drive, to provide access to the eight twinhomes and the main building and parking lots. Staff had multiple discussions with the developer regarding the namingof the streets.There is already a street named Oriole Avenue in the city.The developer has previously agreed tomodify the street names to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive.These streets shall be renamed as a condition ofapproval . The developer’s engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7­ton design.The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their design:Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping andsigning.When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in theMUTCD.In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internalroadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion.Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiateinternal roadways.The raised median has been modified at the West 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and re­striping alongWest 86th Street was addressed to help delineate the travel/turn lanes.PARKING & WALKWAYSThe site plan includes two parking lots for the main building and a small parking lot for the twin homes.The parkinglot aisle of the twin home is 24 feet wide; either the aisle must be revised to 26 feet, or the parking spaces must be 20feet long.The turnaround for the dead­end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet.The plan set includes turning movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building.The driveways entering the parking lots for the main building appear to accommodate the fire truck turning movement.The plans include sidewalks and trails throughout the property.Trails and sidewalks must be constructed per the mostcurrent city standard detail plates and specification.The pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements.WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN:  PRIVATE UTILITIESAll water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and mustmeet the city’s requirements for public utilities.The plans call for 8­inch C900 PVC water main and 8­inch SDR 35sanitary sewer main to connect to the services stubbed out in the city’s previous utility projects on West 86th Street.The water main crosses a draintile at approximately Station 7+92.This crossing must have an elevation separation of18 inches.The current plan set shows an approximately 14­foot drop at 90.28% at the connection to the existing sanitary sewerstub for the parcel.The design indicates the use of two elbows to adjust elevation of the sanitary sewer within thesite.This elevation adjustment must be created with an inside drop within a sanitary manhole, per the City ofChanhassen standard detail plate.ASSESSMENTSThis property was assessed and has paid in full for property assessments for the projects that constructed water mainand sanitary sewer main under West 86th Street.Currently, no assessments are owed by this property.This parcel has paid the city for one water and sanitary service hook­up.The existing hook­ups shall be used as acredit for the main building.All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook­up fee at the timeof final plat.The remaining hook­up fees would be paid with the building permit.The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the city SAC and WAC fees for the mainbuilding.STORMWATER MANAGEMENTArticle VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards.Section 19­141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/orproject proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.”This site willbe compliant with the City of Chanhassen’s MS4 permit.Part III D. 5 requires that new developments with adisturbance equal to, or greater than, one (1) acre must have no net­increase from pre­development conditions ofstormwater discharge volume, total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorous (TP).The site will also becompliant with the NPDES Construction Permit.The site will fall under the jurisdiction of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) and besubject to their stormwater management rule. The developer must receive all necessary permits and approval fromRPBCWD prior to being issued any permits by the city.The proposed best management practices will be privately owned by the property owner.However, as these willdischarge to the city’s storm sewer system, the city is required to insure that these function as designed for their life.Itis also required under the city’s MS4 permit that we have a mechanism in place to assure proper operations,maintenance and function of the practices.The applicant must provide an operations and maintenance plan to the cityfor review and approval.The applicant must provide access to city personnel, or their designees to inspect thepractices and to require maintenance in the event it is not being adequately performed. This will be included as part ofthe development contract.The design should follow the MN Stormwater Manual guidelines and recommendations wherever possible to do so.The applicant shall provide justification for any deviations from the guidelines.For instance, it has been staff’sexperience that filter socks around drain tile are prone to failure.The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommendsbedding the underdrain in #57 stone and using a choker course above the bedding.All basins must have pretreatment of water prior to entering the feature.For those areas where curb cuts serve as the inlet, rip­rap is an effective energy dissipation method reducing the risk of scour; however, it is an ineffective pretreatment method.The online Minnesota Stormwater Manual discusses a variety of pretreatment methods.The applicant should look to this manual for guidance and select an effective pretreatment based upon the recommendation within the manual.City staff has found pretreatment chambers, such as the Rain Guardian™, to be an effective pretreatment practice for curb cut inlets.In areas where stormwater is directed to the basin through a catch basin, a sump manhole at least three feet in depth should be used.This includes the three (3) CBMH labeled 26 on sheet C200. Storm Water Utility Connection Charges Section 4­30 of code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. These fees are based on land use type and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation of surface water. This fee is $126,988.46 due at final plat. PARKS This property is located within the one­half mile neighborhood park service area for Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents of the Mission Hills Senior Living community will have convenient access to this publicly maintained recreation facility. Chanhassen Hills Park is eight acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, ballfield, benches, and walking trails. Off­street parking is also available on Chanhassen Hills Drive South. Bandimere Community Park and Lake Susan Community Park are both located within the one­mile community park service of the new Mission Hills Senior Living housing. These two parks are more robust in their recreation facility offerings, including features such as a fishing pier, boat landing, tennis courts, soccer fields, and extensive walking trails.  No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. TRAILS The subject site has convenient access to the public trails along Great Plains Boulevard, the three­mile Rice Marsh Lake Trail Loop, and the lakeside trail route to Lake Susan Park. No additional trail construction is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision. DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT The attached development contract incorporates the conditions of approval for the final plat and construction plans and specifications.  A $1,049,921.46 financial security is required to guarantee compliance with the terms of the development contract relating to site grading, the installation of streets and utilities, engineering, surveying, inspection, landscaping and topsoil.  The cash fees for this project total $1,028,329.50. City funds are not needed as part of this private development project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motions: Subdivision “The City Council approves the final plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3 rd Addition, replatting 8.64 acres into one lot as shown in plans dated received December 22, 2017, subject to the following conditions: Park and Trail Conditions Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectMission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &SpecificationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner;George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plansdated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYFinal Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, andsouthwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available tothe site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story seniorhousing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings.BACKGROUNDOnMay 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion:Subdivision“The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rdAddition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact andRecommendation,subject to the following conditions:Park and Trail Conditions1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition ofapproval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final platsubmission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling,$5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000.Unit Type No. of Units Amount TotalIndependent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000Total$478,000Finding:This condition still applies.Engineering Conditions :1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69.These shall be due with the final plat.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46. This fee is due with the final plat.”2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection andpreservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water qualitybenefit in perpetuity.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The applicant must prepare an operations andmaintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater bestmanagement practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.Thisplan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.”3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against theproperty.Finding :  This condition still applies.4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs.Finding :  This condition still applies.Planning Conditions:1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit(LUP) resolution and Site Plan application.”Finding :  This condition has been met.The final plat contains one lot which is consistent with the preliminary plat.FINAL PLATThe applicant is requesting final plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot.  Lot 1 is proposed to house a senior livingapartment with a daycare building, and eight twinhomes.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use Districtand is located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86th Street.  Sewer and water areavailable to the site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86 th Street.The ordinance states, “All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by thezoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontageon a public street.”The lot has street frontage.  Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of 86 th Street.The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions.Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the ZoningOrdinance.SITE CONSTRAINTSWetland ProtectionThe City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of anywetlands on the subject property.A review of historic aerial photographs and on­site observations supports theconclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property.Bluff ProtectionThere are no bluffs on the property.Shoreland ManagementA significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan.The development wasrequired to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules.This includes having a minimum of 50%preserved as green space; the applicant is proposing just over 53%.In addition, the applicant must meet the minimumstandards for stormwater management and erosion prevention.A stormwater management plan and an erosionprevention and sediment control plan have been provided.By meeting the requirements of the City and the WatershedDistrict, the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards.Floodplain OverlayThis property does not lie within a floodplain.Bluff Creek OverlayThis property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.SITE GRADING:DRAINAGEThe Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) breaks down the planned individual drainage areas across thesite.The site has five filtration basins that receive the site drainage from the buildings, parking areas, private streets,and open spaces.Generally the site is planned to drain towards the north to 86 th Street and to the south to the right­of­way (ROW) for MN TH 212.The side slopes on the western and southern sides match into Carver County’sROW for CSAH 101 and the MnDOT ROW for TH 212, respectively.The stormwater is treated through the filtration basins.Filtration Basin #5 on the northernmost portion of the parcelconnects a small drain tile to the city’s stormwater drainage system at the intersection of 86 th and Great PlainsBoulevard (CSAH 101).Filtration Basin #1 has an outlet structure designed to overflow stormwater from the basin tothe pipe on the southern boundary of the site that connects to the MnDOT stormwater system for TH 212.FiltrationBasin #2 also discharges to the same stormwater pipe on the southern side of the site that connects to MnDOT’ssystem.Stormwater is collected by two underground tanks prior to conveyance into Filtration Basins #1 and #2 for waterreuse purposed for site irrigation.The proposed plan provides for on­site treatment for the stormwater except where the side slopes match in to theMnDOT and County right­of­way.Any stormwater discharge to MnDOT’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting their conditionsof approval and completion of their permit requirements.Any stormwater discharge to Carver County’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting theirconditions of approval and completion of their permit requirements.SITE GRADING:EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLAn erosion control plan consistent with Section 19­145 of city code has been included in the construction plans.Thisdevelopment exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit.The NPDES construction permit must begranted to the applicant prior to any earth­disturbing activities. Stockpile locations shall be planned and indicated on thegrading and erosion control plan sheets or the SWPPP.RETAINING WALLSThe developer is proposing two retaining walls on the site.One is in the southwestern portion of the site adjacent tothe west end of the main building, and the other is located on the north end of the site adjacent to the twin homenearest to Filtration Basin #5.The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction:smooth face, poured­in­place concrete(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.Walls taller than six feet shall not beconstructed with boulder rock.Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed inthe state of Minnesota.The southern wall is approximately 110 feet long, with a maximum height of 3.2 feet.The northern retaining wall is approximately 190 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet.This wall wraps aroundthe northernmost twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5.TRAFFIC STUDYThe developer commissioned a traffic study to determine what impacts the proposed development would createcompared with not developing the land.The results of the study show that the intersections of CSAH 101 and LakeSusan Drive, CSAH 101 and West 86th Street, and West 86th Street and Mission Hills Drive would have a negligiblechange in Level of Service, and all the studied intersections would function at acceptable levels.The city has been contacted by the Mission Hills Gardens Homeowners Association.This HOA is located nearby onthe north side of West 86th Street.The two letters staff has received are included in this report.From these lettersand a discussion with their Vice­President, the HOA’s main concern is with not an increase in delay from traffic, butthe safety of the left turn from West 86th Street onto the CSAH 101 intersection design as it exists today.CSAH 101 is a county road, and for that reason Carver County has jurisdiction over any changes to the intersectionof CSAH 101 and West 86th Street.City staff has contacted the county to notify them of the residents’ concern in thearea.From MnDOT crash data, there has not been a reported accident at the intersection of CSAH 101 & West86thStreet within the past five years; therefore, it may not be a high priority for a county safety improvement project.Staff also received notice that residents were concerned about the visibility around West 86th Street curves when carsare parked on that street.The developer’s traffic engineer indicated that the proposed development is not expected togenerate additional parking on West 86th Street due to three on­site parking lots.Staff has followed up on this issueoutside of the development review process.The follow­up resulted in the City Council approving a “No Parking”ordinance for a portion of West 86th Street at the February 23, 2015 meeting.STREETSThe proposed plan consists of two private streets, Oriole Lane and Oriole Drive, to provide access to the eight twinhomes and the main building and parking lots. Staff had multiple discussions with the developer regarding the namingof the streets.There is already a street named Oriole Avenue in the city.The developer has previously agreed tomodify the street names to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive.These streets shall be renamed as a condition ofapproval . The developer’s engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7­ton design.The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their design:Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping andsigning.When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in theMUTCD.In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internalroadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion.Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiateinternal roadways.The raised median has been modified at the West 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and re­striping alongWest 86th Street was addressed to help delineate the travel/turn lanes.PARKING & WALKWAYSThe site plan includes two parking lots for the main building and a small parking lot for the twin homes.The parkinglot aisle of the twin home is 24 feet wide; either the aisle must be revised to 26 feet, or the parking spaces must be 20feet long.The turnaround for the dead­end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet.The plan set includes turning movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building.The driveways entering the parking lots for the main building appear to accommodate the fire truck turning movement.The plans include sidewalks and trails throughout the property.Trails and sidewalks must be constructed per the mostcurrent city standard detail plates and specification.The pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements.WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN:  PRIVATE UTILITIESAll water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and mustmeet the city’s requirements for public utilities.The plans call for 8­inch C900 PVC water main and 8­inch SDR 35sanitary sewer main to connect to the services stubbed out in the city’s previous utility projects on West 86th Street.The water main crosses a draintile at approximately Station 7+92.This crossing must have an elevation separation of18 inches.The current plan set shows an approximately 14­foot drop at 90.28% at the connection to the existing sanitary sewerstub for the parcel.The design indicates the use of two elbows to adjust elevation of the sanitary sewer within thesite.This elevation adjustment must be created with an inside drop within a sanitary manhole, per the City ofChanhassen standard detail plate.ASSESSMENTSThis property was assessed and has paid in full for property assessments for the projects that constructed water mainand sanitary sewer main under West 86th Street.Currently, no assessments are owed by this property.This parcel has paid the city for one water and sanitary service hook­up.The existing hook­ups shall be used as acredit for the main building.All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook­up fee at the timeof final plat.The remaining hook­up fees would be paid with the building permit.The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the city SAC and WAC fees for the mainbuilding.STORMWATER MANAGEMENTArticle VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards.Section 19­141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/orproject proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.”This site willbe compliant with the City of Chanhassen’s MS4 permit.Part III D. 5 requires that new developments with adisturbance equal to, or greater than, one (1) acre must have no net­increase from pre­development conditions ofstormwater discharge volume, total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorous (TP).The site will also becompliant with the NPDES Construction Permit.The site will fall under the jurisdiction of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) and besubject to their stormwater management rule. The developer must receive all necessary permits and approval fromRPBCWD prior to being issued any permits by the city.The proposed best management practices will be privately owned by the property owner.However, as these willdischarge to the city’s storm sewer system, the city is required to insure that these function as designed for their life.Itis also required under the city’s MS4 permit that we have a mechanism in place to assure proper operations,maintenance and function of the practices.The applicant must provide an operations and maintenance plan to the cityfor review and approval.The applicant must provide access to city personnel, or their designees to inspect thepractices and to require maintenance in the event it is not being adequately performed. This will be included as part ofthe development contract.The design should follow the MN Stormwater Manual guidelines and recommendations wherever possible to do so.The applicant shall provide justification for any deviations from the guidelines.For instance, it has been staff’sexperience that filter socks around drain tile are prone to failure.The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommendsbedding the underdrain in #57 stone and using a choker course above the bedding.All basins must have pretreatment of water prior to entering the feature.For those areas where curb cuts serve as theinlet, rip­rap is an effective energy dissipation method reducing the risk of scour; however, it is an ineffectivepretreatment method.The online Minnesota Stormwater Manual discusses a variety of pretreatment methods.Theapplicant should look to this manual for guidance and select an effective pretreatment based upon the recommendationwithin the manual.City staff has found pretreatment chambers, such as the Rain Guardian™, to be an effectivepretreatment practice for curb cut inlets.In areas where stormwater is directed to the basin through a catch basin, asump manhole at least three feet in depth should be used.This includes the three (3) CBMH labeled 26 on sheetC200.Storm Water Utility Connection ChargesSection 4­30 of code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. These fees are based on land usetype and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation ofsurface water.This fee is $126,988.46 due at final plat.PARKSThis property is located within the one­half mile neighborhood park service area for Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents ofthe Mission Hills Senior Living community will have convenient access to this publicly maintained recreation facility.Chanhassen Hills Park is eight acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, ballfield, benches,and walking trails. Off­street parking is also available on Chanhassen Hills Drive South. Bandimere Community Park andLake Susan Community Park are both located within the one­mile community park service of the new Mission HillsSenior Living housing. These two parks are more robust in their recreation facility offerings, including features such as afishing pier, boat landing, tennis courts, soccer fields, and extensive walking trails. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision.TRAILSThe subject site has convenient access to the public trails along Great Plains Boulevard, the three­mile Rice Marsh LakeTrail Loop, and the lakeside trail route to Lake Susan Park. No additional trail construction is being recommended as acondition of this subdivision.DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTThe attached development contract incorporates the conditions of approval for the final plat and construction plans andspecifications.  A $1,049,921.46 financial security is required to guarantee compliance with the terms of thedevelopment contract relating to site grading, the installation of streets and utilities, engineering, surveying, inspection,landscaping and topsoil. The cash fees for this project total $1,028,329.50. City funds are not needed as part of this private development project.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motions:Subdivision“The City Council approves the final plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3 rdAddition, replatting 8.64 acres into one lot as shown in plans dated received December 22, 2017, subject to thefollowing conditions:Park and Trail Conditions Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000 Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000 Total $478,000 Engineering Conditions : 1. The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46.This fee is due with the final plat. 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.This plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against the property. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs. Fire Marshall Condition: 1. Prior to release of surety for the utilities constructed as part of this project, the developer shall provide hydraulic calculations to verify water availability under fire conditions of the main building.The design shall provide adequate water flow to support two elevated master streams while the main building is experiencing fire conditions." Development Contract “The City Council approves the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition.” Construction plans “The City Council approves the construction plans dated received December 22, 2017 for Mission Hills 3rd Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. Retaining wall shall not be constructed on top of the storm sewer run from STRM #31 to STRM #32 – Condition Added. 2. The turnaround for the dead­end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet. 3. The current plan set shows an approximately 14­foot drop at 90.28%.This elevation drop must be an inside drop, per Chanhassen standard detail plate, within a sanitary manhole structure. 4. The Architect’s signature date shall be updated to include a month/day/year format. 5. The electrical site plan shall be certified. 6. The private streets shall be renamed to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive. 7. The low area where Filtration Basins #1 and #2 ultimately discharge on the south end of the site shall be graded and protected to convey the water to the existing 36­inch stormwater pipe that connects to the MnDOT TH 212 system.The discharge piping from Filtration Basin #2 does not align well with the 36­inch pipe and the conveyance means need to be further clarified and designed. 8. The grading plan must clearly indicate the location and elevation of the Emergency Over­Flows (EOFs) for the Filtration Basins. 9. The NPDES construction permit must be applied for and granted to the applicant prior to any earth­disturbing activities. 10. Stockpile locations shall be determined and shown on the plans. 11 . The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction:Smooth face, poured­in­place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties, and timber. 12. Retaining walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 13. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 14. If a retaining wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier is required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectMission Hills 3rd Addition: Approve Final Plat, Development Contract, and Plans &SpecificationsSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.13.Prepared By Sharmeen Al­Jaff, Senior Planner;George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: PC 2017­07PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the final plat for Mission Hills 3rd Addition as shown in plansdated received December 22, 2017, subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition; andThe Chanhassen City Council grants approval of the construction plans for Mission Hills 3 rd Addition.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYFinal Plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot, located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard, andsouthwest of 86th Street.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use.  Sewer and water are available tothe site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86th Street.  The site is intended to house a four­story seniorhousing building with a daycare and eight (8) twin home buildings.BACKGROUNDOnMay 8, 2017, the Chanhassen City Council adopted the following motion:Subdivision“The City Council approves the preliminary plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3rdAddition, as shown in plans dated received March 17, 2017, including the attached Findings of Fact andRecommendation,subject to the following conditions:Park and Trail Conditions1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition ofapproval for Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final platsubmission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling,$5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000.Unit Type No. of Units Amount TotalIndependent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000Assisted/Memory Care Apartments 36 $500/bed $18,000Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000Total$478,000Finding:This condition still applies.Engineering Conditions :1. The estimated Surface Water Utility fees are $125,691.69.These shall be due with the final plat.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46. This fee is due with the final plat.”2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection andpreservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water qualitybenefit in perpetuity.Finding :  This condition has been modified to read “The applicant must prepare an operations andmaintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater bestmanagement practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity.Thisplan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.”3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against theproperty.Finding :  This condition still applies.4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs.Finding :  This condition still applies.Planning Conditions:1. Approval of the subdivision request is contingent upon approval of the PUD amendment, Limited Use Permit(LUP) resolution and Site Plan application.”Finding :  This condition has been met.The final plat contains one lot which is consistent with the preliminary plat.FINAL PLATThe applicant is requesting final plat approval to replat 8.64 acres into one lot.  Lot 1 is proposed to house a senior livingapartment with a daycare building, and eight twinhomes.  The site is zoned Planned Unit Development­Mixed Use Districtand is located north of Highway 212, east of Great Plains Boulevard and southwest of 86th Street.  Sewer and water areavailable to the site.  Access to the parcel will be gained off of 86 th Street.The ordinance states, “All lots shall abut for their full required minimum frontage on a public street as required by thezoning ordinance; or be accessed by a private street; or a flag lot which shall have a minimum of thirty feet of frontageon a public street.”The lot has street frontage.  Access to the lot is gained from a curb cut off of 86 th Street.The subdivision request is a relatively straightforward action and staff is recommending approval with conditions.Staff notes that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and generally consistent with the ZoningOrdinance.SITE CONSTRAINTSWetland ProtectionThe City of Chanhassen Wetland Inventory and the National Wetland Inventory do not indicate the presence of anywetlands on the subject property.A review of historic aerial photographs and on­site observations supports theconclusion that there are no wetlands on the subject property.Bluff ProtectionThere are no bluffs on the property.Shoreland ManagementA significant portion of the subject property lies within the shoreland district for Lake Susan.The development wasrequired to meet the PUD requirements for the DNR shoreland rules.This includes having a minimum of 50%preserved as green space; the applicant is proposing just over 53%.In addition, the applicant must meet the minimumstandards for stormwater management and erosion prevention.A stormwater management plan and an erosionprevention and sediment control plan have been provided.By meeting the requirements of the City and the WatershedDistrict, the applicant will have satisfied the DNR standards.Floodplain OverlayThis property does not lie within a floodplain.Bluff Creek OverlayThis property does not lie within the Bluff Creek Overlay District.SITE GRADING:DRAINAGEThe Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) breaks down the planned individual drainage areas across thesite.The site has five filtration basins that receive the site drainage from the buildings, parking areas, private streets,and open spaces.Generally the site is planned to drain towards the north to 86 th Street and to the south to the right­of­way (ROW) for MN TH 212.The side slopes on the western and southern sides match into Carver County’sROW for CSAH 101 and the MnDOT ROW for TH 212, respectively.The stormwater is treated through the filtration basins.Filtration Basin #5 on the northernmost portion of the parcelconnects a small drain tile to the city’s stormwater drainage system at the intersection of 86 th and Great PlainsBoulevard (CSAH 101).Filtration Basin #1 has an outlet structure designed to overflow stormwater from the basin tothe pipe on the southern boundary of the site that connects to the MnDOT stormwater system for TH 212.FiltrationBasin #2 also discharges to the same stormwater pipe on the southern side of the site that connects to MnDOT’ssystem.Stormwater is collected by two underground tanks prior to conveyance into Filtration Basins #1 and #2 for waterreuse purposed for site irrigation.The proposed plan provides for on­site treatment for the stormwater except where the side slopes match in to theMnDOT and County right­of­way.Any stormwater discharge to MnDOT’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting their conditionsof approval and completion of their permit requirements.Any stormwater discharge to Carver County’s system or work within their right­of­way will require meeting theirconditions of approval and completion of their permit requirements.SITE GRADING:EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLAn erosion control plan consistent with Section 19­145 of city code has been included in the construction plans.Thisdevelopment exceeds the threshold for the NPDES Construction Permit.The NPDES construction permit must begranted to the applicant prior to any earth­disturbing activities. Stockpile locations shall be planned and indicated on thegrading and erosion control plan sheets or the SWPPP.RETAINING WALLSThe developer is proposing two retaining walls on the site.One is in the southwestern portion of the site adjacent tothe west end of the main building, and the other is located on the north end of the site adjacent to the twin homenearest to Filtration Basin #5.The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction:smooth face, poured­in­place concrete(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties and timber.Walls taller than six feet shall not beconstructed with boulder rock.Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a professional engineer licensed inthe state of Minnesota.The southern wall is approximately 110 feet long, with a maximum height of 3.2 feet.The northern retaining wall is approximately 190 feet long with a maximum height of 5 feet.This wall wraps aroundthe northernmost twin home, running between the home and Infiltration Basin #5.TRAFFIC STUDYThe developer commissioned a traffic study to determine what impacts the proposed development would createcompared with not developing the land.The results of the study show that the intersections of CSAH 101 and LakeSusan Drive, CSAH 101 and West 86th Street, and West 86th Street and Mission Hills Drive would have a negligiblechange in Level of Service, and all the studied intersections would function at acceptable levels.The city has been contacted by the Mission Hills Gardens Homeowners Association.This HOA is located nearby onthe north side of West 86th Street.The two letters staff has received are included in this report.From these lettersand a discussion with their Vice­President, the HOA’s main concern is with not an increase in delay from traffic, butthe safety of the left turn from West 86th Street onto the CSAH 101 intersection design as it exists today.CSAH 101 is a county road, and for that reason Carver County has jurisdiction over any changes to the intersectionof CSAH 101 and West 86th Street.City staff has contacted the county to notify them of the residents’ concern in thearea.From MnDOT crash data, there has not been a reported accident at the intersection of CSAH 101 & West86thStreet within the past five years; therefore, it may not be a high priority for a county safety improvement project.Staff also received notice that residents were concerned about the visibility around West 86th Street curves when carsare parked on that street.The developer’s traffic engineer indicated that the proposed development is not expected togenerate additional parking on West 86th Street due to three on­site parking lots.Staff has followed up on this issueoutside of the development review process.The follow­up resulted in the City Council approving a “No Parking”ordinance for a portion of West 86th Street at the February 23, 2015 meeting.STREETSThe proposed plan consists of two private streets, Oriole Lane and Oriole Drive, to provide access to the eight twinhomes and the main building and parking lots. Staff had multiple discussions with the developer regarding the namingof the streets.There is already a street named Oriole Avenue in the city.The developer has previously agreed tomodify the street names to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive.These streets shall be renamed as a condition ofapproval . The developer’s engineer must submit documentation that the street pavement meets a 7­ton design.The developer shall incorporate the recommendations from the traffic study into their design:Special consideration should be made to limit any sight distance impacts from future structures, landscaping andsigning.When designing internal traffic controls, incorporate improvements based on guidelines established in theMUTCD.In particular, it is important to identify traffic controls at intersections between internalroadways/driveways to minimize vehicular conflicts and driver confusion.Review truck turning movements to ensure that large vehicles have adequate accommodations to negotiateinternal roadways.The raised median has been modified at the West 86th Street/Mission Hills Drive intersection and re­striping alongWest 86th Street was addressed to help delineate the travel/turn lanes.PARKING & WALKWAYSThe site plan includes two parking lots for the main building and a small parking lot for the twin homes.The parkinglot aisle of the twin home is 24 feet wide; either the aisle must be revised to 26 feet, or the parking spaces must be 20feet long.The turnaround for the dead­end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet.The plan set includes turning movements for a fire truck to navigate the medians for entry access to the main building.The driveways entering the parking lots for the main building appear to accommodate the fire truck turning movement.The plans include sidewalks and trails throughout the property.Trails and sidewalks must be constructed per the mostcurrent city standard detail plates and specification.The pedestrian ramps shall meet ADA requirements.WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER MAIN:  PRIVATE UTILITIESAll water main and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained and mustmeet the city’s requirements for public utilities.The plans call for 8­inch C900 PVC water main and 8­inch SDR 35sanitary sewer main to connect to the services stubbed out in the city’s previous utility projects on West 86th Street.The water main crosses a draintile at approximately Station 7+92.This crossing must have an elevation separation of18 inches.The current plan set shows an approximately 14­foot drop at 90.28% at the connection to the existing sanitary sewerstub for the parcel.The design indicates the use of two elbows to adjust elevation of the sanitary sewer within thesite.This elevation adjustment must be created with an inside drop within a sanitary manhole, per the City ofChanhassen standard detail plate.ASSESSMENTSThis property was assessed and has paid in full for property assessments for the projects that constructed water mainand sanitary sewer main under West 86th Street.Currently, no assessments are owed by this property.This parcel has paid the city for one water and sanitary service hook­up.The existing hook­ups shall be used as acredit for the main building.All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook­up fee at the timeof final plat.The remaining hook­up fees would be paid with the building permit.The developer shall work with the Building Department to determine the city SAC and WAC fees for the mainbuilding.STORMWATER MANAGEMENTArticle VII, Chapter 19 of City Code describes the required storm water management development standards.Section 19­141 states that “these development standards shall be reflected in plans prepared by developers and/orproject proposers in the design and layout of site plans, subdivisions and water management features.”This site willbe compliant with the City of Chanhassen’s MS4 permit.Part III D. 5 requires that new developments with adisturbance equal to, or greater than, one (1) acre must have no net­increase from pre­development conditions ofstormwater discharge volume, total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorous (TP).The site will also becompliant with the NPDES Construction Permit.The site will fall under the jurisdiction of the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District (RPBCWD) and besubject to their stormwater management rule. The developer must receive all necessary permits and approval fromRPBCWD prior to being issued any permits by the city.The proposed best management practices will be privately owned by the property owner.However, as these willdischarge to the city’s storm sewer system, the city is required to insure that these function as designed for their life.Itis also required under the city’s MS4 permit that we have a mechanism in place to assure proper operations,maintenance and function of the practices.The applicant must provide an operations and maintenance plan to the cityfor review and approval.The applicant must provide access to city personnel, or their designees to inspect thepractices and to require maintenance in the event it is not being adequately performed. This will be included as part ofthe development contract.The design should follow the MN Stormwater Manual guidelines and recommendations wherever possible to do so.The applicant shall provide justification for any deviations from the guidelines.For instance, it has been staff’sexperience that filter socks around drain tile are prone to failure.The Minnesota Stormwater Manual recommendsbedding the underdrain in #57 stone and using a choker course above the bedding.All basins must have pretreatment of water prior to entering the feature.For those areas where curb cuts serve as theinlet, rip­rap is an effective energy dissipation method reducing the risk of scour; however, it is an ineffectivepretreatment method.The online Minnesota Stormwater Manual discusses a variety of pretreatment methods.Theapplicant should look to this manual for guidance and select an effective pretreatment based upon the recommendationwithin the manual.City staff has found pretreatment chambers, such as the Rain Guardian™, to be an effectivepretreatment practice for curb cut inlets.In areas where stormwater is directed to the basin through a catch basin, asump manhole at least three feet in depth should be used.This includes the three (3) CBMH labeled 26 on sheetC200.Storm Water Utility Connection ChargesSection 4­30 of code sets out the fees associated with surface water management. These fees are based on land usetype and are intended to reflect the fact that the more intense the development type, the greater the degradation ofsurface water.This fee is $126,988.46 due at final plat.PARKSThis property is located within the one­half mile neighborhood park service area for Chanhassen Hills Park. Residents ofthe Mission Hills Senior Living community will have convenient access to this publicly maintained recreation facility.Chanhassen Hills Park is eight acres in size and features a playground, basketball court, picnic shelter, ballfield, benches,and walking trails. Off­street parking is also available on Chanhassen Hills Drive South. Bandimere Community Park andLake Susan Community Park are both located within the one­mile community park service of the new Mission HillsSenior Living housing. These two parks are more robust in their recreation facility offerings, including features such as afishing pier, boat landing, tennis courts, soccer fields, and extensive walking trails. No additional parkland acquisition is being recommended as a condition of this subdivision.TRAILSThe subject site has convenient access to the public trails along Great Plains Boulevard, the three­mile Rice Marsh LakeTrail Loop, and the lakeside trail route to Lake Susan Park. No additional trail construction is being recommended as acondition of this subdivision.DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTThe attached development contract incorporates the conditions of approval for the final plat and construction plans andspecifications.  A $1,049,921.46 financial security is required to guarantee compliance with the terms of thedevelopment contract relating to site grading, the installation of streets and utilities, engineering, surveying, inspection,landscaping and topsoil. The cash fees for this project total $1,028,329.50. City funds are not needed as part of this private development project.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the City Council adopt the following motions:Subdivision“The City Council approves the final plat to replat Outlot E, Mission Hills into Lot 1, Block 1, Mission Hills 3 rdAddition, replatting 8.64 acres into one lot as shown in plans dated received December 22, 2017, subject to thefollowing conditions:Park and Trail ConditionsFull park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approvalfor Mission Hills Senior Living. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission andapproval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin homedwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000.Unit Type No. of Units Amount TotalIndependent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000Assisted/Memory CareApartments 36 $500/bed $18,000Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000 each $80,000Total$478,000Engineering Conditions :1. The Surface Water Utility fee is $126,988.46.This fee is due with the final plat.2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection andpreservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water qualitybenefit in perpetuity.This plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the city and record that agreement against theproperty.4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs.Fire Marshall Condition:1. Prior to release of surety for the utilities constructed as part of this project, the developer shall provide hydrauliccalculations to verify water availability under fire conditions of the main building.The design shall provideadequate water flow to support two elevated master streams while the main building is experiencing fireconditions."Development Contract“The City Council approves the development contract for Mission Hills 3rd Addition.”Construction plans“The City Council approves the construction plans dated received December 22, 2017 for Mission Hills 3rd Additionsubject to the following conditions:1. Retaining wall shall not be constructed on top of the storm sewer run from STRM #31 to STRM #32 –Condition Added.2. The turnaround for the dead­end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet.3. The current plan set shows an approximately 14­foot drop at 90.28%.This elevation drop must be an insidedrop, per Chanhassen standard detail plate, within a sanitary manhole structure.4. The Architect’s signature date shall be updated to include a month/day/year format.5. The electrical site plan shall be certified.6. The private streets shall be renamed to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive.7. The low area where Filtration Basins #1 and #2 ultimately discharge on the south end of the site shall be gradedand protected to convey the water to the existing 36­inch stormwater pipe that connects to the MnDOT TH212 system.The discharge piping from Filtration Basin #2 does not align well with the 36­inch pipe and theconveyance means need to be further clarified and designed.8. The grading plan must clearly indicate the location and elevation of the Emergency Over­Flows (EOFs) for theFiltration Basins.9. The NPDES construction permit must be applied for and granted to the applicant prior to any earth­disturbingactivities.10. Stockpile locations shall be determined and shown on the plans.11 . The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction:Smooth face, poured­in­place concrete(stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties, and timber.12. Retaining walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock.13. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 14. If a retaining wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier is required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 15. The developer’s engineer shall submit documentation that the street pavement section meets a 7­ton design. 16. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide with 18­foot long parking spaces.The 24­foot aisle width designed would require 20­foot long parking spaces. 17. Pedestrian ramps shall meet current ADA requirements. 18. All watermain and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained.The utility design must meet the city’s requirements for public utilities. 19. The current plan set shows an approximately 14­foot drop at 90.28% at the connection to the existing sanitary sewer stub for the parcel.The design indicates the use of two elbows to adjust the elevation of the sanitary sewer within the site.This elevation adjustment must be created with an inside drop within a sanitary manhole, per the City of Chanhassen standard detail plate. 20. The developer shall remove the existing gate valve on the water service tie­in under West 86 th Street. 21. Install clean­outs on the sanitary service piping to the twin homes at horizontal bend locations. 22. Install curb stops on each water service pipe to the twin homes.Install riser under a driveway casting similar to the draintile clean­out detail. 23. The plans shall label all of the sump catch basins and the aprons on the plan sheets. 24. Create profile views for all of the trunk storm sewer.The line from Filtration Basin #3 to SSMH #19 is not included.Include pipe crossing elevations to verify required clearance. 25. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 26. The hook­up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. 27. All work within the MnDOT right­of­way or the Carver County right­of­way shall be approved and permitted by the respective agency. 28. The site shall be compliant with the City of Chanhassen’s MS4 permit. 29. The proposed BMPs shall be privately owned. 30. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. 31. It is the applicant’s responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project." ATTACHMENTS: Final Plat Development Contract Construction Plans Pages 1­8 Construction Plans Pages 9­16 Construction Plans Pages 17­25 Traffic Study Letter from MnDOT dated April 6, 2017 Letter from Carver County Public Works dated April 6, 2017 Letter from Mission Hills Garden HOA dated October 28, 2014 Letter from Mission Hills Garden HOA dated December 5, 2014 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA MISSION HILLS 3RD ADDITION DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) i TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL PROVISIONS PAGE 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL ............................................................................ SP-1 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL ........................................................................ SP-1 3. DEVELOPMENT PLANS ............................................................................................ SP-1 4. IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................................................................ SP-2 5. TIME OF PERFORMANCE ......................................................................................... SP-2 6. SECURITY .................................................................................................................... SP-2 7. NOTICE ......................................................................................................................... SP-3 8. OTHER SPECIAL CONDITIONS................................................................................ SP-3 9. GENERAL CONDITIONS ........................................................................................... SP-5 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. RIGHT TO PROCEED ................................................................................................. GC-1 2. PHASED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................ GC-1 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS ................................................................................ GC-1 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS ..................................................................... GC-1 5. IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................................................................... GC-1 6. IRON MONUMENTS .................................................................................................. GC-2 7. LICENSE ...................................................................................................................... GC-2 8. SITE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ......................................................... GC-2 8A. EROSION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING OR OTHER BUILDING ......................................................................................... GC-2 9. CLEAN UP ................................................................................................................... GC-3 10. ACCEPTANCE AND OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS .................................... GC-3 11. CLAIMS ....................................................................................................................... GC-3 12. PARK DEDICATION .................................................................................................. GC-3 13. LANDSCAPING .......................................................................................................... GC-3 14. WARRANTY ............................................................................................................... GC-4 15. LOT PLANS ................................................................................................................. GC-4 16. EXISTING ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................................... GC-4 17. HOOK-UP CHARGES ................................................................................................. GC-4 18. PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING..................................................................................... GC-4 19. SIGNAGE ..................................................................................................................... GC-5 20. HOUSE PADS .............................................................................................................. GC-5 21. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS ................................................................................ GC-5 22. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT ......................................................................................... GC-6 22. MISCELLANEOUS A. Construction Trailers ........................................................................................ GC-6 B. Postal Service .................................................................................................... GC-7 C. Third Parties ...................................................................................................... GC-7 D. Breach of Contract ............................................................................................ GC-7 ii E. Severability ....................................................................................................... GC-7 F. Building Permits ............................................................................................... GC-7 G. Waivers/Amendments ....................................................................................... GC-7 H. Release .............................................................................................................. GC-7 I. Insurance ........................................................................................................... GC-7 J. Remedies ........................................................................................................... GC-8 K. Assignability ..................................................................................................... GC-8 L. Construction Hours ........................................................................................... GC-8 M. Noise Amplification .......................................................................................... GC-8 N. Access ............................................................................................................... GC-8 O. Street Maintenance............................................................................................ GC-8 P. Storm Sewer Maintenance ................................................................................ GC-9 Q. Soil Treatment Systems .................................................................................... GC-9 R. Variances........................................................................................................... GC-9 S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations ..................................... GC-9 T. Proof of Title ..................................................................................................... GC-9 U. Soil Conditions................................................................................................ GC-10 V. Soil Correction ................................................................................................ GC-10 W. Haul Routes ......................................................................................................... GC-10 X. Development Signs .............................................................................................. GC-10 Y. Construction Plans ............................................................................................... GC-10 Z. As-Built Lot Surveys ........................................................................................... GC-11 SP-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) MISSION HILLS 3RD ADDITION SPECIAL PROVISIONS AGREEMENT dated _________________ by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City"), and, MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING OWNER, a Limited Liability Corporation (the "Developer"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for MISSION HILLS 3RD ADDITION (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. 3. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plan A, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A: Final plat approved January 22, 2018, prepared by Sunde Land Surveying. Plan B: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan dated December 18, 2017, prepared by BKBM Engineers, Inc. Plan C: Plans for Improvements dated December 18, 2017, prepared by BKBM Engineers, Inc. Plan D: Landscape Plan dated December 18, 2017, prepared by Sperides Reiners Architects, Inc. SP-2 4. Improvements. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Water Drainage System D. Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading/Restoration H. Underground Utilities (e.g. gas, electric, telephone, CATV) I. Setting of Lot and Block Monuments J. Surveying and Staking K. Landscaping L. Erosion Control 5. Time of Performance. The Developer shall install all required improvements by November 15, 2019. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City Engineer. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 6. Security. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank acceptable to the City, or cash escrow ("security") for $1,049,921.46. The amount of the security was calculated as 110% of the following: Site Grading/Erosion Control/Restoration $ 156,000.00 Utilities: Sanitary, Water, Storm Sewer, Infiltration and Retention Systems $ 360,000.00 Streets $ 195,000.00 Street lights and signs (Estimate per Site Plan Agreement) $ 22,500.00 Sub-total, Construction Costs $ 733,500.00 Engineering, surveying, and inspection (7% of construction costs) $ 51,345.00 Landscaping (Estimate per Site Plan Agreement) $ 150,000.00 Sub-total, Other Costs $ 201,345.00 TOTAL COST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS $ 934,845.00 SECURITY AMOUNT (110% of 934,845.00) $1,028,329.50 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The security shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the SP-3 security is drawn down, the draw shall be used to cure the default. With City approval, the security may be reduced from time to time as financial obligations are paid, but in no case shall the security be reduced to a point less than 10% of the original amount until (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required “record” plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 7. Notice. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address: MICHEAL HOAGBERG, MANAGING DIRECTOR MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING OWNER, LLC 17550 HEMLOCK AVENUE LAKEVILLE MN 55044 Phone: 952-378-4386 Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317, Telephone (952) 227-1100. 8. Other Special Conditions. A. SECURITIES AND FEES A. $1,028,329.50 letter of credit or escrow for the developer-installed improvements, the $1,049,921.46 cash administration fee and the fully-executed development contract must be submitted and shall be submitted prior to scheduling a pre-construction meeting. The cash fee was calculated as follows: Administration fee: ($0 at 3%) = $ 0.00 Final Plat = $ 450.00 GIS fee: $25 (plat) + ($10/parcel x 1 parcel) = $ 35.00 Stormwater Utility fee: $126,988.46 Park Dedication fee: $478,000.00 Sewer and Water Hook-Up fee (based on152 units): $444,448.00 Total, Cash Fee = $1,049,921.46 If the signs must be installed in frost conditions, an additional $250/post must be paid by the developer. B. Park and Trail Conditions SP-4 1. Full park fees in lieu of additional parkland dedication and/or trail construction shall be collected as a condition of approval for Outlot E, Mission Hills 3rd Addition. The park fees will be collected in full at the rate in force upon final plat submission and approval. Based upon the current residential park fee rates of $3,800 per apartment dwelling, $5,000 per twin home dwelling, and $500 per bed for continuing care units, the total park fees will be $478,000. Unit Type No. of Units Amount Total Independent Apartments 100 $3,800/unit $380,000 Assisted Living/Memory Care 36 $500/bed $18,000 Rental Twin Homes 16 $5,000/side $80,000 Total $478,000 C. Engineering Conditions: 1. The Surface Water Utility fees are $126,988.46. These shall be due with the final plat.” 2. The applicant must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the stormwater best management practices (BMPs) to provide for the designed water quality benefit in perpetuity. This plan must be approved by the City of Chanhassen Water Resource Coordinator. 3. The applicant must enter into a maintenance agreement with the City and record that agreement against the property. 4. The applicant must dedicate public drainage and utility easements over the private BMPs. 5. Retaining wall shall not be constructed on top of the storm sewer run from STRM #31 to STRM #32 – Condition Added. 6. The top and bottom wall elevation must be revised to correspond with the proposed contours on the southwestern retaining wall. 7. The turnaround for the dead-end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet. 8. The driveways entering the parking lots for the main building must be widened to accommodate the fire truck turning movement. 9. The current plan set shows an approximately 14-foot drop at 90.28%. This elevation drop must be an inside drop, per Chanhassen standard detail plate, within a sanitary manhole structure. SP-5 10. This parcel has paid the City for one water and sanitary service hook-up. The existing hook-ups shall be used as a credit for the main building. All additional units must pay a water and sanitary service partial hook-up fee at the time of final plat. 11. The watermain crosses a draintile approximately at Station 7+92. This crossing must have an elevation separation of 18”. D. Building Official Conditions: 1. The street-name “Oriole”, shown on the submitted documents, is not acceptable. E. Fire Marshall Condition: 1. Prior to release of surety for the utilities constructed as part of this project, the developer shall provide hydraulic calculations to verify water availability under fire conditions of the main building. The design shall provide adequate water flow to support two elevated master streams while the main building is experiencing fire conditions. F. Construction Plan Review Conditions: 1. Retaining wall shall not be constructed on top of the storm sewer run from STRM #31 to STRM #32 – Condition Added. 2. The turnaround for the dead-end parking aisles in the main parking lot must be 10 feet by 26 feet. 3. The current plan set shows an approximately 14-foot drop at 90.28%. This elevation drop must be an inside drop, per Chanhassen standard detail plate, within a sanitary manhole structure. 4. The Architect’s signature date shall be updated to include a month/day/year format. 5. The electrical site plan shall be certified. 6. The private streets shall be renamed to Aldrich Lane and Aldrich Drive. 7. The low area where Filtration Basins #1 and #2 ultimately discharge on the south end of the site shall be graded and protected to convey the water to the existing 36-inch stormwater pipe that connects to the MnDOT TH 212 system. The discharge piping from Filtration Basin #2 does not align well with the 36-inch pipe and the conveyance means need to be further clarified and designed. 8. The grading plan must clearly indicate the location and elevation of the Emergency Over- Flows (EOFs) for the Filtration Basins. 9. The NPDES construction permit must be applied for and granted to the applicant prior to any earth-disturbing activities. SP-6 10. Stockpile locations shall be determined and shown on the plans. 11. The following materials are prohibited for retaining wall construction: Smooth face, poured-in-place concrete (stamped or patterned is acceptable), masonry, railroad ties, and timber. 12. Retaining walls taller than six feet shall not be constructed with boulder rock. 13. Any wall taller than four feet must be designed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 14. If a retaining wall is taller than six feet, a fence or other barrier is required to provide separation from any drive or walkway within 10 feet. 15. The developer’s engineer shall submit documentation that the street pavement section meets a 7-ton design. 16. The parking lot aisles must be a minimum of 26 feet wide with 18-foot long parking spaces. The 24-foot aisle width designed would require 20-foot long parking spaces. 17. Pedestrian ramps shall meet current ADA requirements. 18. All watermain and sanitary sewer main constructed in this project shall be privately owned and maintained. The utility design must meet the city’s requirements for public utilities. 19. The current plan set shows an approximately 14-foot drop at 90.28% at the connection to the existing sanitary sewer stub for the parcel. The design indicates the use of two elbows to adjust the elevation of the sanitary sewer within the site. This elevation adjustment must be created with an inside drop within a sanitary manhole, per the city of Chanhassen standard detail plate. 20. The developer shall remove the existing gate valve on the water service tie-in under West 86th Street. 21. Install clean-outs on the sanitary service piping to the twin homes at horizontal bend locations. 22. Install curb stops on each water service pipe to the twin homes. Install riser under a driveway casting similar to the draintile clean-out detail. 23. The plans shall label all of the sump catch basins and the aprons on the plan sheets. 24. Create profile views for all of the trunk storm sewer. The line from Filtration Basin #3 to SSMH #19 is not included. Include pipe crossing elevations to verify required clearance. SP-7 25. Pretreatment shall be provided for all filtration basins accepting water from driving and parking surfaces. 26. The hook-up fees for the main building are due with the building permit. 27. All work with the MnDOT right-of-way or the Carver County right-of-way shall be approved and permitted by the respective agency. 28. The site shall be compliant with the City of Chanhassen’s MS4 permit. 29. The proposed BMPs shall be privately owned. 30. The infiltrometer testing results for each basin shall be submitted to the city to verify the infiltration rate prior to release of the security for the filtration basins. 31. It is the applicant’s responsibility to assure that permits are received from all other agencies with jurisdiction over the project. 9. General Conditions. The general conditions of this Contract are attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein. SP-8 CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor (SEAL) AND: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING OWNER, LLC: BY: Michael Hoagberg, Managing Director STATE OF MINNESOTA) (ss. COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor, and by Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Michael Hoagberg, Managing Director of MISSION HILLS SENIOR HOUSING OWNER, a Limited Liability Company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 EXHIBIT "A" TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Lot 1, Block 1, MISSION HILLS 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Carver County, Minnesota. MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of , 20 . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20___, by . NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 (952) 227-1100 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard, Box 147 Chanhassen, Minnesota 55317 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2______, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Chanhassen. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2______. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Chanhassen City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Chanhassen City Manager, Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, P.O. Box 147, Chanhassen, MN 55317, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ GC-1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT (Developer Installed Improvements) EXHIBIT "B" GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security and fees have been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the County Recorder's Office or Registrar of Title’s Office of the County where the plat is located, and 4) the City Engineer has issued a letter that the foregoing conditions have been satisfied and then the Developer may proceed. 2. Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multiphased preliminary plat, the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Contract and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City. Park charges and area charges for sewer and water referred to in this Contract are not being imposed on outlots, if any, in the plat that are designated in an approved preliminary plat for future subdivision into lots and blocks. Such charges will be calculated and imposed when the outlots are final platted into lots and blocks. 3. Preliminary Plat Status. If the plat is a phase of a multi-phased preliminary plat, the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within two (2) years after preliminary plat approval. 4. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, except an amendment placing the plat in the current urban service area, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. Improvements. The improvements specified in the Special Provisions of this Contract shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, and plans and specifications which have been prepared and signed by a competent registered professional engineer furnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary permits from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and other pertinent agencies before proceeding GC-2 with construction. The City will, at the Developer's expense, have one or more construction inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer shall also provide a qualified inspector to perform site inspections on a daily basis. Inspector qualifications shall be submitted in writing to the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its project engineer/inspector to respond to questions from the City Inspector(s) and to make periodic site visits to satisfy that the construction is being performed to an acceptable level of quality in accordance with the engineer's design. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a preconstruction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. 6. Iron Monuments. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, all monuments must be correctly placed in the ground in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 505.02, Subd. 1. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 7. License. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 8. Site Erosion and Sediment Control. Before the site is rough graded, and before any utility construction is commenced or building permits are issued, the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented, inspected, and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion and sediment control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion and sediment control plan, seed shall be certified seed to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion and sediment transport. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion and sediment control plan and schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion and sediment transport at the Developer's expense. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the erosion and sediment control requirements. Erosion and sediment control needs to be maintained until vegetative cover has been restored to 90%, even if construction has been completed and accepted. After the site has been stabilized to where, in the opinion of the City, there is no longer a need for erosion and sediment control, the City will authorize the removal of the erosion and sediment control, i.e. hay bales and silt fence. The Developer shall remove and dispose of the erosion and sediment control measures. 8a. Erosion Control During Construction of a Dwelling or Other Building. Before a building permit is issued for construction of a dwelling or other building on a lot, a $500.00 cash escrow or letter of credit per lot shall also be furnished to the City to guarantee compliance with City Code § 7-22. GC-3 9. Clean up. The Developer shall maintain a neat and orderly work site and shall daily clean, on and off site, dirt and debris, including blowables, from streets and the surrounding area that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 10. Acceptance and Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion and acceptance by the City of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. After completion of the improvements, a representative of the contractor, and a representative of the Developer's engineer will make a final inspection of the work with the City Engineer. Before the City accepts the improvements, the City Engineer shall be satisfied that all work is satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and the Developer and his engineer shall submit a written statement to the City Engineer certifying that the project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The appropriate contractor waivers shall also be provided. Final acceptance of the public improvements shall be by City Council resolution. 11. Claims. In the event that the City receives claims from laborers, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment out of the financial guarantees posted with the City, and if the claims are not resolved at least ninety (90) days before the security required by this Contract will expire, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125% of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees. 12. Park Dedication. The Developer shall pay full park dedication fees in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. The park dedication fees shall be the current amount in force at the time of final platting pursuant to Chanhassen City Ordinances and City Council resolutions. 13. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with Plan D. Unless otherwise approved by the City, trees not listed in the City’s approved tree list are prohibited. The minimum tree size shall be two and one-half (2½) inches caliper, balled and burlapped. The trees may not be planted in the boulevard (area between curb and property line) along public streets. In addition to any sod required as a part of the erosion and sediment control plan, Plan B, the Developer or lot purchaser shall sod the boulevard area and all drainage ways utilizing a minimum of six (6) inches of topsoil as a base. Seed or sod shall also be placed on all disturbed areas of the development utilizing a minimum of six (6) inches of topsoil as base. A landscape security equal to the value of the landscape plus 10% will be held by the city until city acceptance of the landscape installation. After satisfactory inspection by City staff, the landscaping may be accepted. Upon acceptance, 10% of the landscape value will be help for one full growing season. When final approval is given after the growing season, the remaining security will be released. GC-4 If the requirements are not satisfied, the City may use the security to satisfy the requirements. The City may also use the escrowed funds for maintenance of erosion control pursuant to City Code Section 7-22 or to satisfy any other requirements of this Contract or of City ordinances. These requirements supplement, but do not replace, specific landscaping conditions that may have been required by the City Council for project approval. 14. Warranty. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, materials and equipment shall be subject to two (2) years from the date of final written acceptance. C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one full growing season following acceptance by the City. 15. Lot Plans. Prior to the issuance of building permits, an acceptable Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control including silt fences, and Tree Removal Plan shall be submitted for each lot for review and approval by the City Engineer. Each plan shall assure that drainage is maintained away from buildings and that tree removal is consistent with development plans and City Ordinance. 16. Existing Assessments. Any existing assessments against the plat will be re-spread against the plat in accordance with City standards. 17. Hook-up Charges. At the time of final plat approval the Developer shall pay 30% of the City Sewer Hook-up charge and 30% of the City Water hook up charge for each lot in the plat in the amount specified in Special Provision, Paragraph 8, of this Development Contract. The balance of the hook-up charges is collected at the time building permits are issued are based on 70% of the rates then in effect, unless a written request is made to assess the costs over a four year term at the rates in effect at time of application. 18. Public Street Lighting. The Developer shall have installed and pay for public street lights in accordance with City standards. The public street lights shall be accepted for City ownership and maintenance at the same time that the public street is accepted for ownership and maintenance. A plan shall be submitted for the City Engineer's approval prior to the installation. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall pay the City a fee of $300.00 for each street light installed in the plat. The fee shall be used by the City for furnishing electricity and maintaining each public street light for twenty (20) months. GC-5 19. Signage. All street signs, traffic signs, and wetland monumentation required by the City as a part of the plat shall be furnished and installed by the City at the sole expense of the Developer. 20. House Pads. The Developer shall promptly furnish the City "as-built" plans indicating the amount, type and limits of fill on any house pad location. 21. Responsibility for Costs. A. The Developer shall pay an administrative fee in conjunction with the installation of the plat improvements. This fee is to cover the cost of City Staff time and overhead for items such as review of construction documents, preparation of the Development Contract, monitoring construction progress, processing pay requests, processing security reductions, and final acceptance of improvements. This fee does not cover the City's cost for construction inspections. The fee shall be calculated as follows: i) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is less than $500,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs; ii) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, three percent (3%) of construction costs for the first $500,000 and two percent (2%) of construction costs over $500,000; iii) if the cost of the construction of public improvements is over $1,000,000, two and one-half percent (2½%) of construction costs for the first $1,000,000 and one and one-half percent (1½%) of construction costs over $1,000,000. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developer shall deposit with the City a fee based upon construction estimates. After construction is completed, the final fee shall be determined based upon actual construction costs. The cost of public improvements is defined in paragraph 6 of the Special Provisions. B. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all costs incurred by the City for providing construction and erosion and sediment control inspections. This cost will be periodically billed directly to the Developer based on the actual progress of the construction. Payment shall be due in accordance with Article 21E of this Agreement. C. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. GC-6 D. In addition to the administrative fee, the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developer may or may not have sold, until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of 8% per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as, but not limited to, sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. G. Private Utilities. The Developer shall have installed and pay for the installation of electrical, natural gas, telephone, and cable television service in conjunction with the overall development improvements. These services shall be provided in accordance with each of the respective franchise agreements held with the City. H. The developer shall pay the City a fee established by City Council resolution, to reimburse the City for the cost of updating the City’s base maps, GIS data base files, and converting the plat and record drawings into an electronic format. Record drawings must be submitted within four months of final acceptance of public utilities. All digital information submitted to the City shall be in the Carver County Coordinate system. 22. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default, not less than four (4) days in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 23. Miscellaneous. A. Construction Trailers. Placement of on-site construction trailers and temporary job site offices shall be approved by the City Engineer as a part of the pre-construction meeting for installation of public improvements. Trailers shall be removed from the subject property within thirty (30) days following the acceptance of the public improvements unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. B. Postal Service. The Developer shall provide for the maintenance of postal service in accordance with the local Postmaster's request. C. Third Parties. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. The City is not a guarantor of the Developer’s obligations under this Contract. The City shall have no responsibility or liability to lot purchasers or others for the City’s failure to enforce this Contract or for allowing deviations from it. GC-7 D. Breach of Contract. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. The City may also issue a stop work order halting all plat development until the breach has been cured and the City has received satisfactory assurance that the breach will not reoccur. E. Severability. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. F. Building Permits. Building permits will not be issued in the plat until sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer have been installed, tested, and accepted by the City, and the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the site graded and revegetated in accordance with Plan B of the development plans. G. Waivers/Amendments. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. Release. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property . After the Developer has completed the work required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request the City Manager will issue a Certificate of Compliance. Prior to the issuance of such a certificate, individual lot owners may make as written request for a certificate applicable to an individual lot allowing a minimum of ten (10) days for processing. I. Insurance. Developer shall take out and maintain until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $500,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The certificate may not contain any disclaimer for failure to give the required notice. J. Remedies. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, expressed or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. GC-8 K. Assignability. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. L. Construction Hours. Construction hours, including pick-up and deliveries of material and equipment and the operation of any internal combustion engine, may only occur from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no such activity allowed on Sundays or on legal holidays. Contractors must require their subcontractors, agents and supplies to comply with these requirements and the Contractor is responsible for their failure to do so. Under emergency conditions, this limitation may be waived by the written consent of the City Engineer. If construction occurs outside of the permitted construction hours, the Contractor shall pay the following administrative penalties: First violation $ 500.00 Second violation $ 1,000.00 Third & subsequent violations All site development and construction must cease for seven (7) calendar days M. Noise Amplification. The use of outdoor loudspeakers, bullhorns, intercoms, and similar devices is prohibited in conjunction with the construction of homes, buildings, and the improvements required under this contract. The administrative penalty for violation of construction hours shall also apply to violation of the provisions in this paragraph. N. Access. All access to the plat prior to the City accepting the roadway improvements shall be the responsibility of the Developer regardless if the City has issued building permits or occupancy permits for lots within the plat. O. Street Maintenance. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until streets within the plat are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed by the Developer when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same and directing attention to detours. If streets become impassable, the City may order that such streets shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall maintain a smooth roadway surface and provide proper surface drainage. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City plow snow on the streets prior to final acceptance of the streets. The City shall have complete discretion to approve or reject the request. The City shall not be responsible for reshaping or damage to the street base or utilities because of snow plowing operations. The provision of City snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. P. Stormwater Management • The Developer shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the private storm sewer system (including ponds, pipes, catch basins, culverts and swales) within the plat. The Developer shall be responsible for cleaning and maintenance of adjacent off-site storm sewer system that receives stormwater from the plat. The Developer shall follow all instructions it receives from the City concerning the cleaning and maintenance of the storm sewer system. The Developer's obligations for cleaning and maintenance of adjacent off-site storm sewer GC-9 system under this paragraph shall end two (2) years after the public street and storm drainage improvements in the plat have been accepted by the City. Twenty percent (20%) of the storm sewer costs, shown under section 6 of the special provisions of this contract, will be held by the City for the duration of the 2-year maintenance period. • The Developer must prepare an operations and maintenance plan that provides for the protection and preservation of the private stormwater treatment devices to provide for the designed water resource benefit in perpetuity. Including contact information for person(s) responsible for maintenance as well as person(s) performing onsite inspection and maintenance duties. The City must approve operation and maintenance plans prior to permits being issued. • The Developer must enter into a maintenance agreement with the City and record that agreement against the property. • A design and planting plan for vegetated BMPs approved by the Water Resources Coordinator is required. Developer must use species native to the ecoregion. • Bio-filtration basin should be identified in sequencing. Basins should not be completed until all contributing area draining to basins are stabilized. • City staff to be called, and be on site when contractor is installing bio-filtration basin to make sure the existing subsoil is scarified 18 inches below surface in bio-filtration basin • Contractor to have written statement as part of the pre-construction meeting, the means and method of how they plan to scarify and protect the subsurface from compaction in the bio- filtration basins. • City staff or their designees shall have access to the site at all times for the purpose of stormwater inspection and maintenance activities. • Developer must submit as-built plans signed by a certified engineer and approved by the Water Resources Coordinator within 90 days of final site stabilization. Q. Soil Treatment Systems. If soil treatment systems are required, the Developer shall clearly identify in the field and protect from alteration, unless suitable alternative sites are first provided, the two soil treatment sites identified during the platting process for each lot. This shall be done prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Any violation/disturbance of these sites shall render them as unacceptable and replacement sites will need to be located for each violated site in order to obtain a building permit. R. Variances. By approving the plat, the Developer represents that all lots in the plat are buildable without the need for variances from the City's ordinances. S. Compliance with Laws, Ordinances, and Regulations. In the development of the plat the Developer shall comply with all laws, ordinances, and regulations of the following authorities: 1. City of Chanhassen; 2. State of Minnesota, its agencies, departments and commissions; 3. United States Army Corps of Engineers; 4. Watershed District(s); 5. Metropolitan Government, its agencies, departments and commissions. GC-10 T. Proof of Title. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish the City with evidence satisfactory to the City that it has the authority of the fee owners and contract for deed purchasers to enter into this Development Contract. U. Soil Conditions. The Developer acknowledges that the City makes no representations or warranties as to the condition of the soils on the property or its fitness for construction of the improvements or any other purpose for which the Developer may make use of such property. The Developer further agrees that it will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, its governing body members, officers, and employees from any claims or actions arising out of the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or pollutants on the property, unless hazardous wastes or pollutants were caused to be there by the City. V. Soil Correction. The Developer shall be responsible for soil correction work on the property. The City makes no representation to the Developer concerning the nature of suitability of soils nor the cost of correcting any unsuitable soil conditions which may exist. On lots which have no fill material a soils report from a qualified soils engineer is not required unless the City's building inspection department determines from observation that there may be a soils problem. On lots with fill material that have been mass graded as part of a multi-lot grading project, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City issues a building permit for the lot. On lots with fill material that have been custom graded, a satisfactory soils report from a qualified soils engineer shall be provided before the City inspects the foundation for a building on the lot. W. Haul Routes. The Developer, the Developer’s contractors or subcontractors must submit proposed haul routes for the import or export of soil, construction material, construction equipment or construction debris, or any other purpose. All haul routes must be approved by the City Engineer X. Development Signs. The Developer shall post a six foot by eight foot development sign in accordance with City Detail Plate No. 5313 at each entrance to the project. The sign shall be in place before construction of the required improvements commences and shall be removed when the required improvements are completed, except for the final lift of asphalt on streets. The signs shall contain the following information: project name, name of developer, developer’s telephone number and designated contact person, allowed construction hours. Y. Construction Plans. Upon final plat approval, the developer shall provide the City with two complete sets of full-size construction plans and four sets of 11”x17” reduced construction plan sets and three sets of specifications. Within four months after the completion of the utility improvements and base course pavement and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with the following: (1) a complete set of reproducible Mylar as-built plans, (2) two complete full-size sets of blue line/paper as-built plans, (3) two complete sets of utility tie sheets, (4) location of buried fabric used for soil stabilization, (5) location stationing and swing ties of all utility stubs including draintile cleanouts, (6) bench mark network, (7) digital file of as-built plans in both .dxf & .tif format (the .dxf file must be tied to the current county coordinate system), (8) digital file of utility tie sheets in either .doc or .tif format, and (9) a breakdown of lineal footage of all utilities GC-11 installed, including the per lineal foot bid price. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. Z. As-Built Lot Surveys. An as-built lot survey will be required on all lots prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued. The as-built lot survey must be prepared, signed, and dated by a Registered Land Surveyor. Sod and the bituminous driveways must be installed before the as- built survey is completed. If the weather conditions at the time of the as-built are not conducive to paving the driveway and/or installing sod, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued and the as-built escrow withheld until all work is complete. Rev. 3/31/06 LOCATION MAPOWNERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERARCHITECTCIVIL ENGINEERSURVEYOR:PROJECT TEAMCONTRACTORHEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT17550 HEMLOCK AVENUELAKEVILLE, MN 55044CONTACT: MIKE HOAGBERGPHONE: (952)378-4386ENGELSMA CONSTRUCTION, INC.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427CONTACT: JEFF ENGELSMAPHONE: (763) 536-9200SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC.4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MN 55437CONTACT: ERIC REINERS, AIAPHONE: (952) 996-9662BKBM ENGINEERS59429 BROOKLYN BLVD.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429CONTACT: TINA WYFFELS, PEPHONE: (763) 843-0420SUNDE LAND SURVEYING9001 EAST BLOOMINGTON FREEWAYSUITE #118BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420CONTACT: LENNY CARLSONPHONE: (952) 881-2455PROJECT IMAGESHEET INDEXBKBM ENGINEERS59429 BROOKLYN BLVD.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55429CONTACT: KEITH MATTE, PEPHONE: (763) 843-0446UNIT NAMESASB*1A1B1C1D*1+A1+B1+C*1+D1+E1+F2A2B2C*2D2E2F2+ATOTALS:*ACCESSIBLE UNITQUANTITY322431154722134639534101SQUARE FOOTAGE504 SF571 SF725 SF803 SF658 SF752 SF986 SF910 SF977 SF832 SF1,088 SF896 SF915 SF1,019 SF1,076 SF1,109 SF1,028 SF903 SF1,370 SFFIRST FLOOR00300010000011010018SECOND FLOOR107131110001111211124THIRD FLOOR117142131111121321135FOURTH FLOOR117142131101121321134UNIT SUMMARYUNIT NAMEMC-1*MC-2MC-3*MC-4MC-5MC-6MC-7MC-8MC-9MC-10MC-11MC-12MC-13MC-14MC-15MC-16MC-17MC-18MC-19MC-20MC-21MC-22MC-23MC-24MC-25MC-26MC-27MC-28TOTALS:*ACCESSIBLE UNITQUANTITY111111111111111111111111111128SQUARE FOOTAGE485 SF439 SF504 SF399 SF460 SF460 SF408 SF512 SF463 SF463 SF399 SF560 SF443 SF399 SF443 SF405 SF463 SF463 SF398 SF411 SF448 SF401 SF416 SF466 SF399 SF399 SF466 SF399 SFMEMORY CARE UNIT SUMMARYUNIT NAMEEC-1*EC-2*EC-3*EC-4*EC-5*EC-6*EC-7*EC-8*TOTALS:*ACCESSIBLE UNITQUANTITY111111118SQUARE FOOTAGE472 SF427 SF504 SF448 SF568 SF510 SF443 SF444 SFEXTENDED CARE UNIT SUMMARYUNIT SUMMARYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTCONFLUENCE530 N THIRD STREETSUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401CONTACT: TERRY MINARIK, PLA, ASLAPHONE: (612) 333-3702REGISTRATION NO.DATEPROJECT NO:4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYREGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTAERIC A. REINERS, AIA26376 1/17SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC.12/19/2017 1:05:47 PMAJATV14-040A0.0MISSION HILLSTITLE SHEETHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAMISSION HILLS SENIOR LIVINGHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 55317DisciplineSHEETSHEET NAMECity SubmittalARCHITECTURAL A3.15 SECOND FLOOR RCP - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A3.16 SECOND FLOOR RCP - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A3.17 THIRD FLOOR RCP - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A3.18 THIRD FLOOR RCP - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A3.19 FOURTH FLOOR RCP - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A3.20 FOURTH FLOOR RCP - AREA B & CARCHITECTURAL A4.00 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSARCHITECTURAL A4.01 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSARCHITECTURAL A4.02 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSARCHITECTURAL A4.03 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONARCHITECTURAL A4.04 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONARCHITECTURAL A4.10 ENLARGED ELEVATIONSARCHITECTURAL A5.00 BUILDING SECTIONSARCHITECTURAL A5.10 WALL SECTIONSARCHITECTURAL A5.11 WALL SECTIONSARCHITECTURAL A5.12 WALL SECTIONSARCHITECTURAL A5.13 WALL SECTIONSARCHITECTURAL A6.00 EXTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A6.01 EXTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A6.02 EXTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A6.03 EXTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A6.04 EXTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A6.05 EXTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A6.06 EXTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A6.07 EXTERIOR DETAILS MONUMENT SIGNARCHITECTURAL A7.00 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT MAIN COMMONSARCHITECTURAL A7.01 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT MAIN COMMONSARCHITECTURAL A7.02 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT MEMORY CAREARCHITECTURAL A7.03 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT DAYCAREARCHITECTURAL A7.04 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT DAYCAREARCHITECTURAL A7.05 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT DAYCARE AND BUSINESS SUITEARCHITECTURAL A7.06 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2ND FLOOR AND PUBLIC TOILETSARCHITECTURAL A7.07 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AT 3RD AND 4TH FLOORSARCHITECTURAL A8.00 DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.01 DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.02 DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.03 DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.04 DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.05 DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.06 UNIT DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.07 INTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.08 INTERIOR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.10 ENLARGED STAIR PLANSARCHITECTURAL A8.11 ENLARGED STAIR PLAN DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A8.12 MAIN STAIR DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A9.00 DOOR AND FRAME SCHEDULE, NOTES, AND ELEVATIONSARCHITECTURAL A9.01 WINDOW ELEVATIONS AND OPENING DETAILSARCHITECTURAL A10.00 FIRST FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A10.01 FIRST FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREA B & CARCHITECTURAL A10.02 FIRST FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREAS D & EARCHITECTURAL A10.03 SECOND FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A10.04 SECOND FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A10.05 THIRD FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A10.06 THIRD FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREA B & CARCHITECTURAL A10.07 FOURTH FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A10.08 FOURTH FLOOR FINISH PLAN - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A10.09 FINISH LEGEND & BASEMENT RFSDisciplineSHEETSHEET NAMECity SubmittalGENERALGENERAL A0.0 TITLE SHEET○PLATPLAT PLAT PLAT○SURVEYSURVEY SURVEY SURVEY○CIVILCIVIL C000 DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN○CIVIL C100 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1○CIVIL C101 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2○CIVIL C102 IRRIGATION AREA PLAN○CIVIL C200 UTILITY PLAN○CIVIL C201 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN AND PROFILES○CIVIL C202 STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES○CIVIL C203 STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES○CIVIL C204 STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILES○CIVIL C300 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN○CIVIL C301 TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT PLAN○CIVIL C400 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET○CIVIL C401 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET○CIVIL C402 CIVIL DETAILS SHEET○CIVIL C500 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN○LANDSCAPELANDSCAPE L100 SITE PLAN○LANDSCAPE L400 REFERENCE PLAN○LANDSCAPE L401 LANDSCAPE PLAN○LANDSCAPE L402 LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH ENLARGEMENT○LANDSCAPE L500 SITE DETAILS○LANDSCAPE L501 PLANTING DETAILS○STRUCTURALSTRUCTURAL S1.0 TITLE SHEETSTRUCTURAL S2.03 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN - AREA ASTRUCTURAL S2.04 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN - AREAS B &CSTRUCTURAL S2.05 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PLAN - AREAS D & ESTRUCTURAL S2.13 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA ASTRUCTURAL S2.14 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREAS B & CSTRUCTURAL S2.15 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREAS D & ESTRUCTURAL S2.20P FIRST FLOOR PRECAST LOADING PLANSTRUCTURAL S2.23 SECOND FLOOR FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA ASTRUCTURAL S2.24 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREAS B & CSTRUCTURAL S2.25 ROOF FRAMING PLAN AREAS D & ESTRUCTURAL S2.33 THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA ASTRUCTURAL S2.34 THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREAS B & CSTRUCTURAL S2.43 FOURTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREA ASTRUCTURAL S2.44 FOURTH FLOOR FRAMING PLAN - AREAS B & CSTRUCTURAL S2.53 ROOF FRAMING PLAN - AREA ASTRUCTURAL S2.54 ROOF FRAMING PLAN - AREAS B & CSTRUCTURAL S3.0 SECTIONS AND DETAILSSTRUCTURAL S3.1 SECTIONS AND DETAILSSTRUCTURAL S3.2 SECTIONS AND DETAILSSTRUCTURAL S3.3 SECTIONS AND DETAILSSTRUCTURAL S3.4 SECTIONS AND DETAILSSTRUCTURAL S3.5 SCHEDULES AND DETAILSSTRUCTURAL S4.0 SCHEDULES AND DETAILSSTRUCTURAL S4.1 SCHEDULES AND DETAILSARCHITECTURALARCHITECTURAL A0.1 CODE SUMMARYARCHITECTURAL A0.2 CODE PLAN - BASEMENTARCHITECTURAL A0.3 CODE PLAN - FIRST FLOORARCHITECTURAL A0.4 CODE PLAN - SECOND FLOORARCHITECTURAL A0.5 CODE PLAN - THIRD FLOORARCHITECTURAL A0.6 CODE PLAN - FOURTH FLOORARCHITECTURAL A0.7 ASSEMBLY TYPESARCHITECTURAL A1.00 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN○ARCHITECTURAL A2.00 BASEMENT LEVEL OVERALLARCHITECTURAL A2.01 MAIN LEVEL OVERALLARCHITECTURAL A2.02 SECOND LEVEL OVERALLARCHITECTURAL A2.03 THIRD LEVEL OVERALLARCHITECTURAL A2.04 FOURTH LEVEL OVERALLARCHITECTURAL A2.05 ROOF PLANARCHITECTURAL A2.10 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A2.11 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A2.12 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A2.13 FIRST FLOOR - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A2.14 FIRST FLOOR - AREAS D & EARCHITECTURAL A2.15 SECOND FLOOR - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A2.16 SECOND FLOOR - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A2.17 THIRD FLOOR - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A2.18 THIRD FLOOR - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A2.19 FOURTH FLOOR - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A2.20 FOURTH FLOOR - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A2.30 AREA A & D FIRST FLOOR - MISCELLANEOUS ENLARGED PLANSARCHITECTURAL A2.31 AREA A & C FIRST FLOOR - MISCELLANEOUS ENLARGED PLANSARCHITECTURAL A2.32 AREA A - MISCELLANEOUS ENLARGED PLANSARCHITECTURAL A2.33 AREA A - MISCELLANEOUS ENLARGED PLANSARCHITECTURAL A2.34 AREA B FIRST FLOOR - DAYCARE WESTARCHITECTURAL A2.35 AREA B FIRST FLOOR - DAYCARE EASTARCHITECTURAL A2.40 UNITS SA AND SBARCHITECTURAL A2.41 UNITS 1A AND 1BARCHITECTURAL A2.42 UNITS 1C AND 1DARCHITECTURAL A2.43 UNITS 1+A AND 1+BARCHITECTURAL A2.44 UNITS 1+C AND 1+DARCHITECTURAL A2.45 UNITS 1+E AND 1+FARCHITECTURAL A2.46 UNITS 2A AND 2BARCHITECTURAL A2.47 UNIT 2CARCHITECTURAL A2.48 UNITS 2D AND 2EARCHITECTURAL A2.49 UNIT 2FARCHITECTURAL A2.50 UNIT 2+AARCHITECTURAL A2.51 EC UNITS AND MC UNITSARCHITECTURAL A3.10 BASEMENT RCP - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A3.11 BASEMENT RCP - AREA B & CARCHITECTURAL A3.12 FIRST FLOOR RCP - AREA AARCHITECTURAL A3.13 FIRST FLOOR RCP - AREAS B & CARCHITECTURAL A3.14 FIRST FLOOR RCP - AREAS D & EPROJECTLOCATIONISSUE RECORDISSUE #DATEDESCRIPTION112/18/2017CD SET DATE:NAME:REG NO: 46674KEITH A. MATTEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PROJECT NO: NPA KAM 2000.01MISSION HILLSHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATEDESCRIPTION4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:1 12/18/2017CD SET2017-18-08 DATE:NAME:REG NO: 46674KEITH A. MATTEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PROJECT NO: NPA KAM 2000.01MISSION HILLSHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATEDESCRIPTION4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:1 12/18/2017CD SET2017-18-08 DATE:NAME:REG NO: 46674KEITH A. MATTEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PROJECT NO: NPA KAM 2000.01MISSION HILLSHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATEDESCRIPTION4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:1 12/18/2017CD SET2017-18-08 DATE:NAME:REG NO: 46674KEITH A. MATTEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PROJECT NO: NPA KAM 2000.01MISSION HILLSHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATEDESCRIPTION4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:1 12/18/2017CD SET2017-18-08 DATE:NAME:REG NO: 46674KEITH A. MATTEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PROJECT NO: NPA KAM 2000.01MISSION HILLSHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATEDESCRIPTION4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:1 12/18/2017CD SET2017-18-08 DATE:NAME:REG NO: 46674KEITH A. MATTEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PROJECT NO: NPA KAM 2000.01MISSION HILLSHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATEDESCRIPTION4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:1 12/18/2017CD SET2017-18-08 DATE:NAME:REG NO: 46674KEITH A. MATTEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PROJECT NO: NPA KAM 2000.01MISSION HILLSHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATEDESCRIPTION4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:1 12/18/2017CD SET2017-18-08 DATE:NAME:REG NO: 46674KEITH A. MATTEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATEOF MINNESOTA.PROJECT NO: NPA KAM 2000.01MISSION HILLSHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTAISSUE RECORDISSUE # DATEDESCRIPTION4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:1 12/18/2017CD SET2017-18-08 2 SHEET L400, L401SHEET L402LEGEND:STANDARD CONCRETECOLORED CONCRETEBITUMINOUS ASPHALTPLANT BED W/ HARDWOOD MULCHSYNTHETIC TURFNATURAL TURF - SEEDNATURAL TURF - SODSHORT GRASS PRAIRIEBIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGSBIOFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX4-6" FIELDSTONE ROCK MULCHOVERSTORY TREEORNAMENTAL TREEEVERGREEN TREEPROJECT NO:ENTM17164MISSION HILLS HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2017 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SR a SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 12/04/2017 CD SET DATE: NAME: REG NO: 42242 TERRY MINARIK 12/18/2017 COPYRIGHT © 2017 BY CONFLUENCE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE BY CONFLUENCE , AND IS INTENDED FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION, USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF CONFLUENCE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. File Location: N:\2017\17164 - Mission Hills SRa\17164 - AutoCAD\L100 / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX SITE PLANL100LAYOUT NOTES:1. ALL CURBS RAMPS TO BE BUILT AS PERFEDERAL AND LOCAL ACCESSIBILITYSTANDARDS. .2. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHOSHA CODES AND STANDARDS. NOTHINGINDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS SHALLRELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR FROMCOMPLYING WITH ANY APPROPRIATESAFETY REGULATIONS.3. VERIFY COORDINATES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.4. CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALLNECESSARY SLEEVES UNDER PAVING ANDWALKS.5. PROPOSED SIGNAGE TO MEET CITY CODESFOR GROUND SIGNS.40'80'20'10'0'1"=40'SCALE:01SITE PLAN AAAHDBCGAF2F3AIAAAAABIIIIIIAKEYNOTES:STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER, SEE DETAIL 07/L5014' ECHELON PLUS FENCE & GATE, SEE DETAIL 11-12/L500MEMORY CARE FENCE & GATE, SEE DETAIL 13/L500PLAYGROUND, BY FLAGSHIP RECREATIONSYNTHETIC TURF AS FALL SURFACE, SEE DETAIL 03/L500SYNTHETIC TURF AS PUTTING GREEN, SEE DETAIL 01/L500GRILL STATION, SEE DETAIL 04-05/L500PERGOLA A & B, SEE DETAIL 06-10/L500MOVABLE SITE FURNITURE, BY OTHERSLEGEND:STANDARD CONCRETECOLORED CONCRETEBITUMINOUS ASPHALTPLANT BED W/ HARDWOOD MULCHSYNTHETIC TURFNATURAL TURF - SEEDNATURAL TURF - SODSHORT GRASS PRAIRIEBIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGSBIOFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX4-6" FIELDSTONE ROCK MULCHOVERSTORY TREEORNAMENTAL TREEEVERGREEN TREEAEBGRACBHIDEFFile Location: N:\2017\17164 - Mission Hills SRa\17164 - AutoCAD\L100 / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX REFERENCEPLANL40020'40'10'5'0'1"=20'SCALE:01REFERENCE PLANPROJECT NO:ENTM17164MISSION HILLS HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2017 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SR a SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 12/04/2017 CD SET DATE: NAME: REG NO: 42242 TERRY MINARIK 12/18/2017 COPYRIGHT © 2017 BY CONFLUENCE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE BY CONFLUENCE , AND IS INTENDED FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION, USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF CONFLUENCE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. E24BN2GT30CA1KC1GT1TC56RG39SH12CA88RO35CA21RO32SH51DL2GT18HY3AF25RO92RO6QB3TC25HD8HY12HM17HD33AC22HD14AC6TC1AB1KC1BP2PC2OV1PN10RA3BN1BN1PA1UA1PR1KC1MA1TM5QB1OV1BP1PR1AB1PC1BP1GT1BN1PA2AF1PC1TM1CI3PA1KC1TM1PR1AB1TM1QB1BP1QB1BN1AF1PC1AB1UA1PN1KC1UA29RO1GT1CI1MA1TC1PI6BS5HY1TC30PE26PE45SH18PE43MN8SHLEGEND:STANDARD CONCRETECOLORED CONCRETEBITUMINOUS ASPHALTSYNTHETIC TURFNATURAL TURF - SEEDNATURAL TURF - SODSHORT GRASS PRAIRIEBIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGSBIOFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX4-6" FIELDSTONE ROCK MULCHOVERSTORY TREEORNAMENTAL TREEEVERGREEN TREETREE CALLOUTSHRUB/PERENNIAL CALLOUT#XX#XXFile Location: N:\2017\17164 - Mission Hills SRa\17164 - AutoCAD\L400 Enlargements / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX LANDSCAPEPLANL40120'40'10'5'0'1"=20'SCALE:01MULTILINETITLEPROJECT NO:ENTM17164MISSION HILLS HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2017 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SR a SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 12/04/2017 CD SET DATE: NAME: REG NO: 42242 TERRY MINARIK 12/18/2017 COPYRIGHT © 2017 BY CONFLUENCE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE BY CONFLUENCE , AND IS INTENDED FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION, USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF CONFLUENCE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 27HM33AC88DE20HM1AP3CA29AC3CA14EC8AR15PH5SS26CO22RG11MN58MN94EC65SH30SH54DE29HM29LS10DE35PH32PE33RO54MN11CA10CA20HM33LS5RO13DE5RO8CA13DE40PV14HM19RG14RG19MNLEGEND:STANDARD CONCRETECOLORED CONCRETEBITUMINOUS ASPHALTSYNTHETIC TURFNATURAL TURF - SEEDNATURAL TURF - SODSHORT GRASS PRAIRIEBIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGSBIOFILTRATION BASIN SEED MIX4-6" FIELDSTONE ROCK MULCHOVERSTORY TREEORNAMENTAL TREEEVERGREEN TREETREE CALLOUTSHRUB/PERENNIAL CALLOUT#XX#XXFile Location: N:\2017\17164 - Mission Hills SRa\17164 - AutoCAD\L400 Enlargements / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX LANDSCAPEPLAN -SOUTHENLARGEMENTL40210'20'5'2.5'0'1"=10'SCALE:01LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH ENLARGEMENTPROJECT NO:ENTM17164MISSION HILLS HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2017 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SR a SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 12/04/2017 CD SET DATE: NAME: REG NO: 42242 TERRY MINARIK 12/18/2017 COPYRIGHT © 2017 BY CONFLUENCE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE BY CONFLUENCE , AND IS INTENDED FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION, USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF CONFLUENCE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1X WRAPPED COLUMNSURROUNDGALVINIZED CARRIAGE BOLTS(2 PER CONNECTION)6 x 6 POST BASESIMPSON STRONGTIE18"CONCRETE FOOTING 5'-0" MIN,VERIFY WITH STRUCTURALENGINEER.SEE PLAN FOR CONCRETESURFACE TYPECONSTRUCTION JOINT4"NOTE: SEE DETAIL 02 FOR POSSIBLEFINISH NOTES.1X 8 WRAPPED TRIM1X 4 WRAPPED TRIMCAULK BETWEENTRIM FORWATERTIGHT SEAL1'-0" O.C.2X8 BEAM2X6 BEAM1X4 WRAPPED TRIM2X2 ANGLE W/LAG BOLTCONNECTIONS2X2 SLAT1X8 WRAPPED TRIM1X WRAPPEDCOLUMN SURROUND6X6 POSTLAG SCREWCONNECTION, EMBED 2"INTO BEAM BELOWNOTE: SEE DETAIL 02/LS501 FORPOSSIBLE FINISH NOTES.2"4"2X8 BEAM2X6 BEAM1X4 WRAPPED TRIM2X2 ANGLE W/LAG BOLTCONNECTIONS2X2 SLAT1X8 WRAPPED TRIM1X WRAPPEDCOLUMN SURROUND6X6 POST2"6"NOTE: SEE DETAIL 02/LS501 FORPOSSIBLE FINISH NOTES.1'-0" O.C.VARIES, SEE PLAN06L50008L5002 x 6 BEAM2 x 8 SOLID BEAM6X6 TREATED POST - WRAPCOLUMN WITH WHITECEMENT BOARD ORENGINEERED PLASTICBOARD9'-0"VARIES, SEE PLAN9'-0"COLOR: WHITEOPTION 1:SMOOTH ENGINEERED PLASTICOPTION 2:SANDED, PRIMED, AND PAINTED CEDARPERGOLA FINISH OPTIONS:2 x 2 SOLID BEAM07L500·ALL BOLTED CONNECTIONS TO BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED·STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS AND FINISH NAILS TO BE USEDPERGOLA FINISH NOTES:31516" TYPICAL114" x 1716"FORERUNNER Rail(See Cross- Section on Panel Drawing)TM15"4VarieswithHeightStandard Heights3', 312', 4', 5, 6'21" Min.Footing depth23" (Latch Clearance)Ameristar StandardLeaf Widths238" (Hinge Clearance)Single gate ArrangementPost size varies with Height(See ECHELON PLUS Post-Sizing chart)TM2"Nom.34" x .080 wall PicketGate Upright134" x .125 wallWeld on Box Hinge(Requires steel posts)3VarieswithHeight4NOTE:INSTALL FENCE PER MANUFACTURERSRECOMMENDATIONS.MODEL: ECHELON PLUSSTYLE: MAJESTIC, HEIGHTS VARY- SEELAYOUT PLAN, 3 RAIL, BLACK.MANUFACTURER: AMERISTAR FENCEW: AMERISTARFENCE.COMP: 1.888.333.3422Bracket Options114" x 1716" FORERUNNER Rail(See Cross- Section Below)8' O.C. Nom.VarieswithHeightStandard Heights3', 312', 4', 5', 6'21" Min.Footing depth2" Nom.5"324Post size varies with Height(See ECHELON Plus Post-Sizing chart)TM131516"TYPICAL34" x .045" PicketTMVarieswithHeight1'-0"SECASECTION AELEVATIONNOTES:2x RAILS TO BE FASTENED TO POSTS WITH POCKET SCREWS(CONCEALED BY VERTICAL PICKETS).POSTS SHALL BE SET IN A 4'-0" (MIN) DEPTH CONCRETE FOOTINGFENCE TO BE PRIMED AND PAINTED, COLOR AND FINISH TBD.2x6 TOP CAP RAIL2 x 6 RAIL5/4 x 6 PICKETS w/ 1/2" GAPSPACING2 x 6 RAIL6 x 6 POST w/ POST CAP (COLOR/MATERIAL TBD)5/4 x 6 PICKETS w/ 1/2" GAPSPACING2 x 4 RAIL, FRONT OF FENCE2 x 4 RAIL, BACK OF FENCE2 x 6 BRACE, BACK OF FENCEHEAVY DUTY HOOK SCREWAND STRAP HINGETHUMB LEVER LATCH FORTWO-SIDED ACCESS4'-0"CONCRETE FOOTING16'-0"DIA2X4 RAIL2x6 BOTTOM CAP RAIL2 x 6 RAIL2 x 6 RAIL5/4 x 6 PICKETS w/ 1/2" GAPSPACING2X2 RAIL2X2 RAILCROSS HALVING JOINTS @PICKET INTERSECTIONSSHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED5'-0"O.C.3'-6" MINEQUAL O.C.2'-6"EQUAL O.C.8'-0" MAXIMUMVENEER TO MATCHARCHITECTURESTONE COUNTERTOPFINISHED GRADE05L500WEBBER SUMMITS-660 BUILT-INGAS GRILL2X4 STEEL FRAMECONSTRUCTIONSTONE COUNTERTOPWEBBER SUMMITS-660 BUILT-IN GAS GRILLFLUSH WITH VENEER FACADEVENEER TO MATCHARCHITECTURE11'-0"3'-0" 3'-0"NAIL OR STAPLEARTIFICIAL TURF TO BOARDUNDISTURBED GRADEPRESSURE TREATED 2X4,TRIM TO FIT AS NECESSARYARTIFICIAL TURF GRASSINFILL MATERIAL3/8" COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE24" STAKE3/4"4" MIN.PLANT BED MATERIALNOTE:INSTALL ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS AND INFILLMATERIAL PER MANUFACTURERSRECOMMENDATIONS.316" METAL EDGER / STAKE,PER SPEC.PLANTING SOIL3/4"4" MIN.NAIL OR STAPLEARTIFICIAL TURF TOBOARDFASTEN BOARD WITHSS SCREWSCONCRETE WALKUNDISTURBEDGRADE3/8" COMPACTEDGRAVEL BASEPRESSURE TREATED2X4, TRIM TO FIT ASNECESSARYGEOTEXTILEFABRICARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS, ASSPECIFIED.INFILL MATERIAL.3/4"NOTE:INSTALL ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS AND INFILLMATERIAL PER MANUFACTURERSRECOMMENDATIONS.MANUFACTURER: FOREVERLAWN MINNESOTATROY JOHNSON P: 612 210 1946troy@mn.foreverlawn.comARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS, AS SPECIFIED.INFILL MATERIAL.NAILER BOARD,MOUNTED 12" BELOW CONCRETESURFACEAND SECURED WITHCONCRETEFASTENERSCONCRETE EDGE2.25" SAFETY FOAMCOMPACTEDAGGREGATESUBBASESUBGRADE3"NOTE:INSTALL ARTIFICIAL TURF GRASS AND INFILLMATERIAL PER MANUFACTURERSRECOMMENDATIONS.MANUFACTURER: FOREVERLAWN MINNESOTATROY JOHNSON P: 612 210 1946troy@mn.foreverlawn.comPROJECT NO:ENTM17164MISSION HILLS HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2017 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SR a SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 12/04/2017 CD SET DATE: NAME: REG NO: 42242 TERRY MINARIK 12/18/2017 COPYRIGHT © 2017 BY CONFLUENCE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE BY CONFLUENCE , AND IS INTENDED FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION, USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF CONFLUENCE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.GRILL STATION04L500N.T.SPERGOLA CONNECTION DETAIL 06L500N.T.SPERGOLA CONNECTION DETAIL 07L500N.T.SPERGOLA COLUMN DETAIL 08L500N.T.SPERGOLA, FRONT VIEW09L500N.T.SGRILL STATION SECTION 05L500N.T.SPERGOLA, SIDE VIEW10L500N.T.SSITEDETAILSL500SYNTHETIC PLAY TURF03L500N.T.S.PUTTING GREEN TURF @ PLANT BED02L500N.T.S.PUTTING GREEN TURF01L500N.T.S.4' ECHELON PLUS FENCE11L500N.T.S4' ECHELON PLUS GATE12L500N.T.SMEMORY GARDEN FENCE13L500N.T.S S SSD D 2/3D EDGE OF PLANTING AREAPLANT ROW-TYP.PLANT CENTER-TYP.TRIANGULARSPACING - 'S'DISTANCE BETWEENROWS - 'D'TOTAL AREA PERPLANT (SF)12"15"18"21"24" (2')30"36" (3')42"10-1/2"13"15-1/2"18"21"26"31"36"0.881.351.942.633.505.427.7510.50SEE PLAN12"MIN.PREPARE SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BED4"3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DONOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITHSHRUB STEM.NOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTIONRELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING.CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED.MIN.4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITHPLANTING SOIL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.113 x AMIN.30"RADIUS MIN.4"AEACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCHTHAT THE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THETOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOTFLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BEREMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THEROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAINORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAINORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENTGRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOTBALL WITH SOIL.SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITHSPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PREPARED SOIL.PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVETIMES THE DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL,SLOPEDTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASEFIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THATROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.DRAINAGE TRENCH AS REQUIRED PERPERCOLATION TEST IN SPEC. AUGER A 4"DIA. HOLE & FILL W/ 34" GRAVEL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOIL.DIG PLANTING PIT 4-6" DEEPER THANROOTBALL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.REMOVE BURLAP, WINE, ROPEAND WIRE FROM TOP HALFOF ROOT BALL.COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO85% OF MAXIMUM DRY UNITWEIGHT PER ASTM D 698.EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEEPLAN.4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCERBEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL.3" SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCHIN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE.RODENT TRUNK PROTECTION: 12"HARDWIRE-CLOTH MESHCYLINDER. DIMENSIONS: 8"DIAMETER (OR GREATER) X 36"HEIGHT. STAKE IN PLACE,AVOIDING ROOTS. SEE SPEC.NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLEFOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMBPOSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTYPERIOD. STAKING AND GUYING ISMANDATORY FOR TREES 4" CAL ORGREATER, AND ALL BARE ROOT TREES.WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPONAPPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 32 93 00.5' DIAMETER MULCH RING, TYP.1'- 6"4'-5" MIN.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.STEEL EDGING,AS SPECIFIEDMINIMIZE CONTACTW/ PLANT STEM(S)SET TOP OF ROOT CROWN 1" ABOVEFINISHED GRADE. MOUND PLANTINGBED SOIL SLIGHTLY TO TO TOP OFROOT CROWN.ORGANIC MULCH,AS SPECIFIED.TOP OF MULCH IS TO BELOWTOP OF WALK/CURB EXTENDINGA MIN. OF 1'-6" FROM EDGE OFWALK/CURB.5" DEEP MULCH POCKETCONCRETE WALK MAY OCCURNOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTIONRELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING.PLANTING SOILSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OFENTIRE BED WITH SPACE BY HANDTO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL.3" MIN.CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTS HAVE LOOSENED.3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH(SEE SPECIFICATIONS)FINISHED GRADE ANDEDGE CONDITIONVARIES - SEE PLANFOR CONDITION.316" METAL EDGER W/STAKE, PER SPEC.VEGETATION - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN12" PLANTING SOILUNDISTURBED SOIL6" COMPACTED CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASECONCRETE PAVEMENTHOLD LAWN/PLANTINGCONDITION 1" BELOWFINISHED PAVERS6"6"4"4"2"SODSOIL FROM SODCUTTINGTOPSOILDISCED SUBGRADESUBGRADEPROJECT NO:ENTM17164MISSION HILLS HWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WEST CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2017 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC CDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SR a SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 12/04/2017 CD SET DATE: NAME: REG NO: 42242 TERRY MINARIK 12/18/2017 COPYRIGHT © 2017 BY CONFLUENCE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE BY CONFLUENCE , AND IS INTENDED FOR USE ON THIS PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION, USE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF CONFLUENCE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.TREE PLANTING, TYP. 03L501N.T.S.PLANT BED @ CONC WALK 02L501N.T.S.SHRUB PLANTING, TYP.04L501N.T.S.PLANT SPACING, TYP. 05L501N.T.S.PLANTING BED, TYP. 06L501N.T.S.STEEL LANDSCAPE EDGER07L501N.T.S.SOD PLANTING01L501N.T.S.PLANTING NOTES1. NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HASBEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.2. PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANTING BEDS IMMEDIATELYPRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF MULCH, FOR WEED CONTROL.3. NO EXCAVATION OR PLANTING PIT SHALL BE LEFT OPEN OVERNIGHT.4. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THEAMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1. UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIEDHEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGINBRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET ANDBOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE PAVEDSURFACE.5. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE ANY PLANTMATERIAL OR ANY DEFECTIVE WORKMANSHIP.6. MEASUREMENT OF CONIFER HEIGHT SHALL INCLUDE NOT MORE THAN FIFTYPERCENT (50%) OF THIS YEARS VERTICAL GROWTH (TOP CANDLE).7. PLANT SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IFDISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKEPRECEDENCE OVER NOTES.8. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE STAKING OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TODIGGING.9. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL ONLY BE ALLOWED WHEN THE CONTRACTOR HASEXHAUSTED ALL SOURCES FOR THE SPECIFIED MATERIAL, AND HAS PROVEN THATTHE SPECIFIED MATERIAL IS NOT AVAILABLE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDENAME AND VARIETY OF SUBSTITUTION TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO TAGGING OR PLANTING. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE NEARESTEQUIVALENT SIZE OF VARIETY OF PLANT HAVING SAME ESSENTIALCHARACTERISTICS. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALSMAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TOADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS.10. PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS.11. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONEMEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THEMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALLINSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 10-0-5 OF 12 OZ. PER 2.5"CALIPER TREE AND 6 OZ. PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-0-10THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER.12. PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS OR VINESSHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 45PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS SCREENED COMPOST AND 10 PARTS SAND OR ASOTHERWISE SPECIFIED.13. TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO-WALLED PLASTIC SHEETING APPLIEDFROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAP SMOOTH-BARKED DECIDUOUS TREESPLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1 AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1.14. 3/16" THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS,PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS SOD - UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.15. ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER.16. SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.17. CONIFEROUS TREES ARE TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH ANDSHALL HAVE NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE TREE TRUNK.18. ALL DECIDUOUS, PINE, AND LARCH TREE PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE RODENTPROTECTION PER MNDOT 2571.31.2. DO NOT PROVIDE ON SPRUCE TREES.19. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONECALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. NO PARTIALACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED.20. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANTMATERIAL INSTALLATION IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15.21. CONIFEROUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO OCTOBER 1. FALLDECIDUOUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15.ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.22. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THAT EACHEXCAVATED TREE OR SHRUB PIT WILL PERFOLATE (DRAIN) PRIOR TO ADDINGTOPSOIL AND INTALLING PLANT MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL THEBOTTOM OF SELECTED HOLES WITH SIX INCHES OF WATER. THIS WATER SHOULDPERCOLATE WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSHALL VERIFY ACCURACY AND EFFECT OF PERCOLATION TESTING. IF THE SOIL AT AGIVEN AREA DOES NOT DRAIN PROPERLY, A PVC DRAIN OR GRAVEL SUMP SHALL BEINSTALLED OR PLANTING RELOCATED IF DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.23. SHOULD THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER UNSATISFACTORY SURFACEOR OTHER SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS, SOIL DEPTH, LATENT SOILS, HARDPAN, STEAM OF OTHER UTILITY LINES OR OTHER CONDITIONS THAT WILLJEOPARDIZE THE HEALTH AND VIGOR OF THE PLANTS, HE MUST ADVISE THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF THE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLING THEPLANTS, OTHERWISE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WARRANTS THAT THEPLANTING AREAS ARE SUITABLE PROPER GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEPLANTS TO BE INSTALLED.24. ALL HYDRANGEA PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM TOP SOIL DEPTH OF 12" WITHTHE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS MET:24.1. ALL PLANTS PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 2" ABOVE GRADE24.2. BACKFILL ALL PLANTING HOLES WITH A MIX OF SPECIFIED GROWING MEDIUMAND TILLED TOPSOIL.24.3. AMEND TOPSOIL WITH ROOT STIMULANT APPROPRIATE FOR HYDRANGEAS.24.4. VERIFY PLANTING PITS HAVE PASSED PERCOLATION TEST.PLANTING SCHEDULES08L501N.T.S.SHORT SEED MIXTURE09L501N.T.S.N.T.SL501BIOFILTRATION BASIN PLUGS11BIOINFILTRATION MIXTURE10L501N.T.S.N.T.SL501CITY REQUIREMENTS12PLANTINGDETAILSL501 A6.07432222214554'-0"4'-0"6" DIA ~ STL. PIPEPOURED CONC.FOOTING, TYP.GROUND LEVEL18" x 18"FILL TOP OF PIPEW/ CONC. MIN. 6"1/2" EXP. MAT'LFILL BOTTOM OF PIPEWITH SAND1' - 6"6"1".6"GRADE LINE3' - 0"2' - 6"4' - 0"1' - 0"PAINTED ALUMINUM CABINET WITH LED LIT 6" LETTER SIGNAGE. COORDINATE VERBAGE WITH OPERATORCONCRETE PIERCONCRETE FOOTINGFOOTING, PIER, AND SIGN DESIGN AND INSTALLATION BY SIGNAGE CONTRACTORENGINEERED SOILS PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS2' - 6"SITE PLAN KEYNOTES12BOLLARDS, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORDIRECTIONAL SIGNAGEMONUMENT SIGNFLAG POLEGATE. PROVIDE KNOX BOX AT BOTH LOCATIONS, COORDINATE CONTENTS WITH CITY OF CHANHASSEN.345REGISTRATION NO.DATEPROJECT NO:4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROADSUITE 220BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437PH: 952-996-9662FX: 952-996-9663WWW.SRA-MN.COMCOPYRIGHT 2017SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INCCDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYREGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTAERIC A. REINERS, AIA26376 1/17SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC.12/19/2017 1:06:44 PMAJATV14-040A1.00MISSION HILLSARCHITECTURAL SITEPLANHWY 101 AND 86TH STREET WESTCHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA 1" = 40'-0"A1.001SITE PLAN 1" = 1'-0"A1.002BOLLARD - EXTERIOR 1/2" = 1'-0"A1.003DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGEISSUE RECORDISSUE #DATEDESCRIPTION CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject 7700 Quattro Drive: Amend Conditional Use Permit for Cell Tower Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.14. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case 2018­03 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit to permit the extension of a communication tower up to 90 feet subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact.” Council approval requires a Majority Vote of the entire council. SUMMARY The applicant is requesting an amendment to CUP 2000­06 to permit a tower height of 87 feet, which is taller than the 75­foot height originally approved, to allow the co­location of antennas on the tower. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 16, 2018 to review the proposed development.  The Planning Commission voted 4 ­ 0 for a motion recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit to permit a telecommunication tower up to 100 feet in height subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report.  There were no issues or concerns with the proposal. DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit to allow a 15.2­foot tower extension with a three­foot lightning rod on top of the existing 68.8­foot tower. The original approval was for up to a 75­foot tower and appurtenances. As a condition of approval, the tower was to be able to accommodate additional antennas for co­ location. The tower was designed such that it would be extendable in the future to accommodate an additional antenna above the existing antennas. City Code permits communication towers up to 150 feet in height. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the amendment to Conditional Use Permit #2000­06 to permit the construction of an extension of the communication tower up to 90 feet monopole, plans prepared by Design 1, dated CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018Subject7700 Quattro Drive: Amend Conditional Use Permit for Cell TowerSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.14.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: Planning Case 2018­03PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit to permit the extension of acommunication tower up to 90 feet subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the Planning Commission'sFindings of Fact.”Council approval requires a Majority Vote of the entire council.SUMMARYThe applicant is requesting an amendment to CUP 2000­06 to permit a tower height of 87 feet, which is taller than the75­foot height originally approved, to allow the co­location of antennas on the tower.BACKGROUNDThe Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 16, 2018 to review the proposed development.  ThePlanning Commission voted 4 ­ 0 for a motion recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit to permit atelecommunication tower up to 100 feet in height subject to the conditions of approval in the staff report.  There wereno issues or concerns with the proposal.DISCUSSIONThe applicant is requesting an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit to allow a 15.2­foot tower extension with athree­foot lightning rod on top of the existing 68.8­foot tower. The original approval was for up to a 75­foot towerand appurtenances. As a condition of approval, the tower was to be able to accommodate additional antennas for co­location. The tower was designed such that it would be extendable in the future to accommodate an additional antennaabove the existing antennas.City Code permits communication towers up to 150 feet in height.RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the amendment to Conditional Use Permit #2000­06 to permit the construction of an extension of the communication tower up to 90 feet monopole, plans prepared by Design 1, dated revised April 4, 2017, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit is required to construct the platform and tower extension; the tower must be designed for a 90 MPH wind load and include the effect of one­half inch of radial ice.  2. The original plans must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. The contractor shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures.  4. The applicant shall submit a detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plan for staff review and approval. 5. The tower extension shall be of the same color as the existing tower. 6. A letter of intent committing the tower owner and his or her successors to allow the shared use of the tower if an addition user agrees in writing to meet reasonable terms and conditions for shared use shall be submitted to the city. ATTACHMENTS: Amended Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Staff Report Dated January 16, 2018 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA AMENDED AND RESTATED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #2000-06 FOR A TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER 1. Permit. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the City of Chanhassen hereby grants a conditional use permit for the following use: to permit the installation of a communication tower for up to a 100 foot monopole tower and equipment platform. 2. Property. The permit is for property situated in the City of Chanhassen, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Quattro Addition (7700 Quattro Drive) 3. Conditions. The permit is issued as shown on plans prepared by Design 1, dated revised 04-10-17, subject to the following conditions: a. A building permit is required to construct the platform and tower extension; the tower must be designed for a 90 MPH wind load and include the effect of one-half inch of radial ice. b. The original plans must be signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. c. The contractor shall meet with the Inspections Division as early as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. d. The applicant shall submit a detailed grading, drainage, and erosion control plan for staff review and approval. e. The tower extension shall be of the same color as the existing tower. f. A letter of intent committing the tower owner and his or her successors to allow the shared use of the tower if an addition user agrees in writing to meet reasonable terms and conditions for shared use shall be submitted to the city. 4. Termination of Permit. The City may revoke the permit following a public hearing for violation of the terms of this permit. 5. Lapse. If within one year of the issuance of this permit the authorized construction has 2 not been substantially completed or the use commenced, this permit shall lapse, unless an extension is granted in accordance with the Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance. 6. Criminal Penalty. Violation of the terms of this conditional use permit is a criminal misdemeanor. Dated: February 12, 2018 CITY OF CHANHASSEN By: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor By: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss COUNTY OF CARVER ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th day of February, 2018, by Denny Laufenburger, Mayor and Todd Gerhardt, City Manager, of the City of Chanhassen, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: City of Chanhassen 690 City Center Drive Chanhassen, MN 55317 (612)937-1900 g:\plan\2018 planning cases\18-03 - 7700 quattro dr\cup.doc CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject 2018 Pay Equity Report Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.15. Prepared By Chelsea Petersen, Assistant City Manager File No: ADM 150 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the attached 2018 Pay Equity Implementation Report and directs staff to submit the report to the Department of Employee Relations.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND In 1984, the Minnesota Legislature passed the Local Government Pay Equity Act.Basically, the intent of the law is to ensure that men and women performing similar jobs are compensated in an equal manner. Local governments were given until December 31, 1991 to comply with the law and were required to file reports with the Department of Employee Relations (DOER) by January 31, 1992. All jurisdictions were then placed on a three­year reporting cycle for future reports. Attached is a computer­generated report based on inputs supplied by the City of Chanhassen. The report is fairly confusing, but the figure which denotes compliance is the underpayment ratio under Roman numeral II on the Compliance Report. According to DOER, jurisdictions must maintain a ratio of 80% or higher to comply with the statute. The City of Chanhassen is at 97.49%.Staff believes we are in compliance with the Act. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Chanhassen City Council approve the attached 2018 Pay Equity Implementation Report and direct staff to submit the report to the Department of Employee Relations. ATTACHMENTS: Compliance Report Implementation Report ­ DRAFT Compliance Report Jurisdiction: Contact:Phone: Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 2018 Case: Report Year: 1 - 2018 Data (Private (Jur Only)) Chelsea Petersen CPetersen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us(952) 227-1118 E-Mail: The statistical analysis, salary range and exceptional service pay test results are shown below. Part I is general information from your pay equity report data. Parts II, III and IV give you the test results. For more detail on each test, refer to the Guide to Pay Equity Compliance and Computer Reports. I. GENERAL JOB CLASS INFORMATION Male Classes Female Classes Balanced Classes All Job Classes # Job Classes # Employees Avg. Max Monthly Pay per employee II. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TEST A. Underpayment Ratio = Male Classes Female Classes a. # At or above Predicted Pay b. # Below Predicted Pay c. TOTAL d. % Below Predicted Pay (b divided by c = d) * *(Result is % of male classes below predicted pay divided by % of female classes below predicted pay.) B. T-test Results Degrees of Freedom (DF) = Value of T = a. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for male jobs = b. Avg. diff. in pay from predicted pay for female jobs = III. SALARY RANGE TEST = (Result is A divided by B) A. Avg. # of years to max salary for male jobs = B. Avg. # of years to max salary for female jobs = IV. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE PAY TEST = (Result is B divided by A) A. % of male classes receiving ESP * B. % of female classes receiving ESP *(If 20% or less, test result will be 0.00) 31 17 2 50 49 31 11 91 7,411.37 6,370.42 6,610.33 97.49 15 8 16 9 31 17 51.61 52.94 78 0.510 $2 ($73) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pay Equity Implementation Report 1/29/2018Print Date: Part A: Jurisdiction Identification Jurisdiction:Jurisdiction Type:CityChanhassen 7700 Market Blvd. P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 * DRAFT COPY * Phone:Contact:E-Mail:(952) 227-1118Chelsea Petersen CPetersen@ci.chanhassen.mn.us Part B: Official Verification The job evaluation system used measured skill, effort responsibility and working conditions and the same system was used for all classes of employees. 1. The system used was: Description: 2.Health Insurance benefits for male and female classes of comparable value have been evaluated and: Part C: Total Payroll is the annual payroll for the calendar year just ended December 31. 3.An official notice has been posted at: (prominent location) informing employees that the Pay Equity Implementation Report has been filed and is available to employees upon request. A copy of the notice has been sent to each exclusive representative, if any, and also to the public library. The report was approved by: (governing body) (chief elected official) (title) Checking this box indicates the following: Date Submitted: There is no difference and female classes are not at a disadvantage. Designed Own Admin Area Copy Room Chanhassen City Council Denny Laufenburger Mayor Same system used since 2001. - signature of chief elected official - approval by governing body - all information is complete and accurate, and - all employees over which the jurisdiction has final budgetary authority are included $5,889,703.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­16: Accept Public Street and Utility Improvements in Glaccum Highlands Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.16. Prepared By Steve Ferraro, Construction Manager File No: Project 2015­07 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the public street and utility improvements in Glaccum Highlands development for perpetual maintenance and ownership.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY Staff has received a letter from Mark Rausch, P.E. with Alliant Engineering, Inc., requesting the City consider acceptance of the public street and utility improvements in the above­referenced project. According to Mr. Rausch, the public street and utility improvements have been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications. Staff has performed a walk­through inspection of the public streets and utilities and finds them acceptable for perpetual maintenance and ownership contingent upon receipt of a two­year maintenance bond. ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Mark Rausch dated January 24, 2018 Location Map Resolution January 24, 2018 Steve Ferraro City of Chanhassen, Engineering Department 7700 Market Boulevard P.O. Box 147 Chanhassen, MN. 55317 Re: Glacuum Highlands- Subdivision Project Acceptance Request Dear Mr Ferraro, On behalf of Estate Development Corporation, Alliant Engineering has reviewed the completed construction status of the Glaccum Highlands subdivision. It is the professional opinion of our office that the necessary infrastructure installations have been completed and installed within City of Chanhassen engineering standards and specifications. We respectfully request on behalf of the Developer, that the City of Chanhassen accept the project as “complete”. Please contact me directly at 612-767-9339 should you require any additional information or have any questions. Sincerely, Alliant Engineering, Inc. Mark Rausch, P.E. License No. 43480 Cc: Tom Gonyea/EDC, Dennis Olmstead and Dave Lyons/AE CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: February 12, 2018__ RESOLUTION NO: __2018-XX MOTION BY: ____________ SECONDED BY: ________ A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS IN GLACCUM HIGHLANDS PROJECT NO. 2015-07 WHEREAS, the City has received a letter from Mark Rausch of Alliant Engineering, Inc. indicating the public street and utility improvements have been completed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications and all testing has been successfully completed; and WHEREAS, staff has performed a walk-through inspection and finds the improvements acceptable for perpetual maintenance and ownership. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chanhassen City Council hereby accepts the public street and utility improvements in Glaccum Highlands, Project No. 15-07, for perpetual maintenance and ownership contingent upon receipt of a two-year maintenance bond.. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 12th day of February, 2018. ATTEST: Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­17: 3821 West 62nd Street: Cathcart Park Detachment to City of Shorewood Section CONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.17. Prepared By Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director File No: GEN 134 PROPOSED MOTION “The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution authorizing the concurrent detachment of land from Chanhassen and annexation to Shorewood.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The subject property is located in the northwest part of the city on the north side of Highway 7. The acreage of the property is 4.75.  CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­17: 3821 West 62nd Street: Cathcart Park Detachment to City of ShorewoodSectionCONSENT AGENDA Item No: D.17.Prepared By Kate Aanenson AICP, Community Development Director File No: GEN 134PROPOSED MOTION“The Chanhassen City Council approves a resolution authorizing the concurrent detachment of land from Chanhassen and annexation toShorewood.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe subject property is located in the northwest part of the city on the north side of Highway 7. The acreage of the property is 4.75.  SUMMARY In 1993, the cities of Shorewood and Chanhassen entered into a joint agreement under which Chanhassen provided turf and tree maintenance and Shorewood provided for capital improvements and management of the park. In the fall of 2017, the two cities terminated their joint maintenance and operation agreement. It is now the desire of both cities to detach the park from Chanhassen and annex it to the City of Shorewood. The park will then become a part of Shorewood and will be operated as a park solely by the City of Shorewood. This process involves concurrent resolutions from both cites supporting the change. Based on Carver County Taxpayer Services, the property has a 2017 market value of approximately $791,800.00.The park does not generate taxes. The City of Chanhassen has a permanent easement and right­of­way for “public utilities, street and drainage purposes over, across, on, under and through”the 17 feet along the eastern side of the park.While at this time the city has no desire to use/improve this right of way, it could be improved in the future.Attached is the legal description and map of the easement area. On February 12, 2018, the City of Shorewood is scheduled to approve a resolution authorizing the concurrent detachment and annexation as per Minnesota Statues 414.061.A letter was sent notifying all properties within 500 feet in both cities of the proposed detachment/annexation. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the concurrent detachment of land from Chanhassen and annexation to Shorewood. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution Schmid's Acre Tracts and Parcel Description Letter to property owners 1993 Joint Agreement Property owners list for mailing Cathcart Park Termination Signed Easement Description Easement Map Property Report Card 4829-4997-3585.3 City of Chanhassen Resolution No. 2018 - _____ City of Shorewood Resolution No. 2018 - _____ A JOINT RESOLUTION REQUESTING CONCURRENT DETACHMENT FROM CHANHASSEN AND ANNEXATION INTO SHOREWOOD OF CERTAIN LANDS PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 414.061 WHEREAS, certain real property, approximately 4.75 acres in size, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and described as (the “Annexation Property”) is located in the City of Chanhassen; and WHEREAS, the Annexation Property is located along the northerly border of Chanhassen that is contiguous to the City of Shorewood; and WHEREAS, the Annexation Property was acquired in fee title in 1973 and is entirely owned by the City of Shorewood; and WHEREAS, the Annexation Property is commonly known as Cathcart Park and was entirely improved and maintained by the City of Shorewood prior to 1993, and since 1993 has shared park maintenance with the City of Chanhassen; and WHEREAS, the City of Shorewood, the City of Chanhassen want the entire Cathcart Park Parcel to be located in the corporate limits of the City of Shorewood; and WHEREAS, the Cities of Chanhassen and Shorewood want to modify their mutual municipal boundary to permit the Cathcart Park Parcel to be located entirely within Shorewood; and WHEREAS, to modify the boundary, the City of Chanhassen desires to detach and the City of Shorewood desires to annex the Cathcart Park Parcel pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 414.061. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The Cities of Chanhassen and Shorewood jointly request that the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings – Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit concurrently detach the Annexation Property from the City of Chanhassen and annex the same to the City of Shorewood at the earliest possible date. 2. The City Attorney for the City of Shorewood is authorized to submit this resolution along with all appropriate application materials to the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings – Municipal Boundary Adjustment Unit for the purposes set forth herein. Resolution No. 2018 - ___ Page 2 4829-4997-3585.3 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen on the ___ day of ____________, 2018. Denny Laufenburger, Mayor ATTEST: Kim Meuwissen, City Clerk Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Adopted by the City Council of the City of Shorewood on the ___ day of ____________, 2018. Scott Zerby, Mayor ATTEST: Sandie Thone, City Clerk Greg Lerud, City Administrator January 26, 2018 Dear Resident, The City of Shorewood is proposing a detachment/annexation of Cathcart Park. The 4.54 acre Cathcart Park, (Lot 5 of Schmidt’s Acre Tracts) is owned by the City of Shorewood, but is currently located in the City of Chanhassen. In 1993, the Cities of Shorewood and Chanhassen entered into a joint agreement under which Chanhassen provided turf and tree maintenance and Shorewood provided for capital improvements and management of the park. In the fall of 2017, the two cities terminated their joint maintenance and operation agreement. It is now the desire of both cities to detach the park from Chanhassen and annex it to the City of Shorewood. The park will then become a part of Shorewood and will be operated as a park solely by the City of Shorewood. This process involves concurrent resolutions from both cites supporting the change. The concurrent detachment and annexation is for the park only and does not include any of the abutting right of way, and no residential properties are affected by this proposed annexation. Both cities have scheduled consideration on the resolution supporting detachment at their meetings on February 12, 2018. Location Map For questions contact: City of Chanhassen Todd Hoffman Park & Recreation Director 952-227-1129 Paul Oehme City Engineer & Public Works Director 952-227-1169 City of Shorewood Greg Lerud City Administrator 952-960-7905 TAX_NAME TAX_ADD_L1 ALEX M LOSCHEIDER 6250 CARTWAY LN ALMA ROSA RIOS 3891 MEADOW LN AMANDA LEUKUMA 6310 CHURCH RD AMY THILL 6185 CHURCH RD BOULDER COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 7100 NORTHLAND CIR N STE 300 CATHRYN M SCHULENBERG 3713 STRAWBERRY LN CHARLES JONES & ANGELA COURTNEY 6160 CHURCH RD CHRISTOPHER DEWANE 3697 STRAWBERRY LN CITY OF SHOREWOOD 5755 COUNTRY CLUB RD CLIFFORD & PATRICIA LAUGHLIN 26505 MAPLE AVE CRAIG A PARSONS 26540 62ND ST W DANA & TIFFANY HANSEN 26450 62ND ST W DAVID T PARK 3828 MEADOW CT DENISE FUNG 6321 CHURCH RD DONALD J & WENDIE A SEAMANS 6301 CHURCH RD DOUBLE JK FARMS LLC PO BOX 16108 EDWARD J CAMERON 26580 62ND ST W GARY CARLSON 3891 62ND ST W GRANT DUWE 3681 STRAWBERRY LN HENNEPIN CO REG RR AUTHORITY 300 6TH ST S HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 JANET MARIEN 6175 CHURCH RD JEFFREY R BERGE 3856 MEADOW LN JONATHAN A WALKER 4130 PIPEWOOD LN JUSTIN L BLUM/JESSICA M BLUM 6155 CHURCH RD KEVIN E ALSTRIN 3841 62ND ST W KEVIN POWELL 3800 MEADOW LN KEVIN R & ANNEMARIE S O'MEARA 3814 MEADOW CT LAUREANA VOUNG BOUALOUANG 3884 MEADOW LN MARK D KELSEY 4150 PIPEWOOD LN MARK H MORFORD 6150 CHURCH RD MARTIN BENJAMIN HOOK 3790 MEADOW LN MARTIN M & RENEE J HEILAND 26510 62ND ST W MEGAN J CARLSON 3891 62ND ST W MEGHAN & BENJAMIN BECKER 6180 CATHCART DR MICHAEL L & CARRIE L MILLER 6311 CHURCH RD MICHAH BARLASS 26420 62ND ST W MINNEWASHTA CHURCH 26710 62ND ST W MOMCILO SPASOJEVIC 3771 MEADOW LN PATRICIA B CHARNEY 3861 MEADOW LN PATRICK L & BONNIE C MONAHAN 3801 MEADOW LN PAUL SEEMANN 6330 CHURCH RD RANDALL A & LISA M MAYER 3831 MEADOW LN RITA A DETRUDE 26620 62ND ST W ROBERT J WETHERALL 6135 CHURCH RD RONALD D ZUEHL 6180 CHURCH RD RYAN P & KRISTEN B MONNENS 3870 MEADOW LN SCOTT H DELONG IV 3842 MEADOW CT SCOTT S SMITH 3705 STRAWBERRY LN SEAN G MATCHAN 6241 CHURCH RD SIMON LEWIS & SARAH G LEWIS 6130 CHURCH RD STACY PAGANO 3721 STRAWBERRY LN STEINKRAUS CHURCH RD STORAGE 112 5TH ST E #101 STEVEN B HENRIKSEN 4100 PIPEWOOD LN TIMOTHY J LENZEN 6170 CHURCH RD TROY H HANRATTY 4110 PIPEWOOD LN VICTOR M RAMOS 4140 PIPEWOOD LN W H OELFKE & J H OELFKE 6170 STRAWBERRY LN WADE A NAVRATIL 3751 62ND ST W WILBERT U GO & DIANE L GO REV TRUST 3689 STRAWBERRY LN WILLIAM G JOHNSON 6135 CATHCART DR WILLIAM H & KIMBERLY A KOHMAN 3780 MEADOW LN YONG K CHO 4120 PIPEWOOD LN TAX_ADD_L2 TAX_ADD_L3 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7846 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8837 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 BROOKLYN PARK MN 55428-1583 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8336 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8311 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8927 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7839 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8838 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8838 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416- SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8803 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8311 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487-1308 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7768 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8803 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7839 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7761 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8803 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8838 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8837 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7839 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8336 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8836 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8336 CHASKA MN 55318-2277 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7761 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7768 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7768 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-6401 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-8311 SHOREWOOD MN 55331 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7840 EXCELSIOR MN 55331-7768 Property Card Taxpayer Information Property Address Parcel Information Building Information Miscellaneous Information Assessor Information Ta xp ayer N ameCITY O F SHOR EWOOD Mailin g Address 5755 CO UNTRY CLUB RD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331-8927 Parcel ID Number 25770 0060 Address City Uses Muni Srvc Other GIS Acre sDeeded AcresPlatLotBlock 4.5 44.7 5SCHMID'S ACRE TRACTS005 Ta x Description & INCLUDES AN UNDIVIDED COMMON INTEREST IN TRACT LABELED AS RESERVE ON PLAT OF Bu ilding Style Year Built Garag e Ab ove G radeFinished Sq Ft Be drooms Scho ol District Watershed District Homestead Green Acre s Ag Preserve0276WS 062 MINNEHAHA CREEK N N N Estimated Market Value Land Bu ilding To tal 2016 Value s(Paya ble 2017 )2017 Value s(Paya ble 2018 )Last Sale Date of Sale Sa le Va lue $754,100 .00 $0.00 $754,100 .00 $791,800 .00 $0.00 $791,800 .00 The data provided herewith is for reference purposes only. This data is not suitable for legal, engineering, surveying or other similar purposes. Carver County does not guarantee the accuracy of theinformation contained herein. This data is furnished on an ‘as is’ basis and Carver County makes no representations or warranties, either expressed or implied, for the merchantability or fitness of theinformation provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03 and the user of the dataprovided herein acknowledges that Carver County shall not be liable for any damages, and by using this data in any way expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and holdharmless Carver County, its officials, officers, agents, employees, etc. from any and all claims brought by anyone who uses the information provided for herein, its employees or agents, orthird parties which arise out of user's access. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user includeswith the data a copy of this disclaimer. Wednesday, January 24, 2018 Carver Co unty, MN Net Acre s CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Approve Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Target Corporation, dba Target Store T­0862, 851 West 78th Street Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ Target PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves the request for an off­sale intoxicating liquor license from Target Corporation dba Target Store T­0862 located at 851 West 78th Street. Approval of the license would be contingent upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy, satisfactory background investigation results, and final approval by the Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Department.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY This office has received a request for an off­sale intoxicating liquor license from Target Corporation dba Target Store T­0862, which would be constructed inside of the existing Target Store located at 851 West 78th Street.  A new exterior entrance will be constructed on the west side of the building, just north of the existing Target Store entrance (see location map attachment).  There will also be a separate interior entrance that can be locked and inaccessible to store customers when the liquor store is closed.   The size of the proposed liquor store is 2,637 square feet.  The property is zoned Planned Unit Development and specialty sales, including liquor sales, is a permitted use in this district.  Liquor sales are also allowed in the Business Neighborhood (BN), Business Highway (BH), Central Business District (CBD), Community Commercial (CC), and General Business (BG) zoning districts.  The applicant anticipates opening the liquor store on March 1, 2018. Target Corporation is a publicly held corporation.  The table below shows the corporate officers listed on the application. Officer Name and Title Percent of Ownership Janine L. Brown­Wiese, Vice President Negligible (Less than 1%) Corey L. Haaland, Senior Vice President/Treasurer Negligible (Less than 1%) The Carver County Sheriff’s Office has been requested to complete a background investigation on the Operating Manager, Steven O’Meara.  The investigation will include criminal history checks, driving records, and outstanding warrants. Target Corporation owns and operates over 1,380 liquor stores in the United States, with 27 of those stores located in Minnesota. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectApprove Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Target Corporation, dba Target Store T­0862,851 West 78th StreetSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1.Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ TargetPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the request for an off­sale intoxicating liquor license from Target Corporation dba TargetStore T­0862 located at 851 West 78th Street. Approval of the license would be contingent upon issuance of acertificate of occupancy, satisfactory background investigation results, and final approval by the Minnesota Alcoholand Gambling Department.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThis office has received a request for an off­sale intoxicating liquor license from Target Corporation dba Target StoreT­0862, which would be constructed inside of the existing Target Store located at 851 West 78th Street.  A newexterior entrance will be constructed on the west side of the building, just north of the existing Target Store entrance(see location map attachment).  There will also be a separate interior entrance that can be locked and inaccessible tostore customers when the liquor store is closed.   The size of the proposed liquor store is 2,637 square feet.  Theproperty is zoned Planned Unit Development and specialty sales, including liquor sales, is a permitted use in thisdistrict.  Liquor sales are also allowed in the Business Neighborhood (BN), Business Highway (BH), Central BusinessDistrict (CBD), Community Commercial (CC), and General Business (BG) zoning districts.  The applicant anticipatesopening the liquor store on March 1, 2018.Target Corporation is a publicly held corporation.  The table below shows the corporate officers listed on theapplication.Officer Name and Title Percent of OwnershipJanine L. Brown­Wiese, Vice President Negligible (Less than 1%)Corey L. Haaland, Senior Vice President/Treasurer Negligible (Less than 1%)The Carver County Sheriff’s Office has been requested to complete a background investigation on the OperatingManager, Steven O’Meara.  The investigation will include criminal history checks, driving records, and outstandingwarrants. Target Corporation owns and operates over 1,380 liquor stores in the United States, with 27 of those stores located in Minnesota. A public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site.  As of the date of this staff report, staff has not received any comments or concerns. A review of Carver County tax records show that all tax payments on the property are paid to date. BACKGROUND In 1994, Chanhassen City Code was amended to restrict the number of off­sale intoxicating liquor licenses allowed in the city to four. The restriction was put into effect after Byerly’s requested a license in the General Business (BG) zoning district. Off­sale licenses were not specifically listed as a use in this district; however, specialty retail was permitted. It was the city attorney’s opinion that liquor stores were a sub­class of specialty retail and thereby a permitted use. At the time, the council expressed concern that if they approved one license in the BG zone that a precedent would be set for other sites in the same zoning district. To eliminate that concern, the council amended the ordinance to limit the number of licenses to four. In 2005, Tara Clawson petitioned the city to raise the limit because she wanted to open a WineStyles store in Chanhassen. After surveying our Key Financial Cities, only two of the ten restricted the number of off­sale licenses. The council felt that the market would regulate the number of stores and therefore removed the restriction on the number of off­sale licenses altogether. The table below lists all of the current off­sale license holders in Chanhassen along with their approximate square footage and the year their license was approved by the city council. Current Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor Establishments Name Approximate Square Footage Year Approved MGM, 7856 Market Blvd.6,000 1992 Cheers Wine & Spirits, 530 West 79th Street 9,000 1993 Byerly’s, 780 West 78th Street 3,600 1994 Haskell’s, 19900 West 78th Street 8,000 2009 The Vintage, 8971 Crossroads Boulevard, #160 5,000 2012 Total Wine & More, 510 Lake Drive 19,909 2015 Historically, there were six other establishments that had off­sale licenses in the city as shown in the table below. Previous Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor Establishments Name Year Closed Pony Express Bar 1981 (off­sale only) Pauly’s Warehouse Liquors 1989 Pass­By Liquors 1997 WineStyles 2008 Century Wine & Spirits 2015 Wine & Spirits at 7 & 41 2017 RECOMMENDATION State law and Chanhassen City Code do not limit the number of off­sale liquor licenses allowed in the city.  Additionally, it does not set store square footage minimums/maximums, or distance requirements from churches/schools or between liquor stores. Staff recommends approval of the off­sale liquor license requested by Target Corporation dba Target Store T­0862 located at 851 West 78th Street.  Approval of the license would be contingent upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy, satisfactory background investigation results, and final approval by the Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectApprove Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Target Corporation, dba Target Store T­0862,851 West 78th StreetSectionPUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.1.Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: LIQ TargetPROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves the request for an off­sale intoxicating liquor license from Target Corporation dba TargetStore T­0862 located at 851 West 78th Street. Approval of the license would be contingent upon issuance of acertificate of occupancy, satisfactory background investigation results, and final approval by the Minnesota Alcoholand Gambling Department.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThis office has received a request for an off­sale intoxicating liquor license from Target Corporation dba Target StoreT­0862, which would be constructed inside of the existing Target Store located at 851 West 78th Street.  A newexterior entrance will be constructed on the west side of the building, just north of the existing Target Store entrance(see location map attachment).  There will also be a separate interior entrance that can be locked and inaccessible tostore customers when the liquor store is closed.   The size of the proposed liquor store is 2,637 square feet.  Theproperty is zoned Planned Unit Development and specialty sales, including liquor sales, is a permitted use in thisdistrict.  Liquor sales are also allowed in the Business Neighborhood (BN), Business Highway (BH), Central BusinessDistrict (CBD), Community Commercial (CC), and General Business (BG) zoning districts.  The applicant anticipatesopening the liquor store on March 1, 2018.Target Corporation is a publicly held corporation.  The table below shows the corporate officers listed on theapplication.Officer Name and Title Percent of OwnershipJanine L. Brown­Wiese, Vice President Negligible (Less than 1%)Corey L. Haaland, Senior Vice President/Treasurer Negligible (Less than 1%)The Carver County Sheriff’s Office has been requested to complete a background investigation on the OperatingManager, Steven O’Meara.  The investigation will include criminal history checks, driving records, and outstandingwarrants.Target Corporation owns and operates over 1,380 liquor stores in the United States, with 27 of those stores locatedin Minnesota.A public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the proposed site.  As of the date of thisstaff report, staff has not received any comments or concerns.A review of Carver County tax records show that all tax payments on the property are paid to date.BACKGROUNDIn 1994, Chanhassen City Code was amended to restrict the number of off­sale intoxicating liquor licenses allowed inthe city to four. The restriction was put into effect after Byerly’s requested a license in the General Business (BG)zoning district. Off­sale licenses were not specifically listed as a use in this district; however, specialty retail waspermitted. It was the city attorney’s opinion that liquor stores were a sub­class of specialty retail and thereby apermitted use. At the time, the council expressed concern that if they approved one license in the BG zone that aprecedent would be set for other sites in the same zoning district. To eliminate that concern, the council amended theordinance to limit the number of licenses to four.In 2005, Tara Clawson petitioned the city to raise the limit because she wanted to open a WineStyles store inChanhassen. After surveying our Key Financial Cities, only two of the ten restricted the number of off­sale licenses.The council felt that the market would regulate the number of stores and therefore removed the restriction on thenumber of off­sale licenses altogether. The table below lists all of the current off­sale license holders in Chanhassenalong with their approximate square footage and the year their license was approved by the city council.Current Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor EstablishmentsNameApproximateSquare Footage Year ApprovedMGM, 7856 Market Blvd.6,000 1992Cheers Wine & Spirits, 530 West 79th Street 9,000 1993Byerly’s, 780 West 78th Street 3,600 1994Haskell’s, 19900 West 78th Street 8,000 2009The Vintage, 8971 Crossroads Boulevard,#160 5,000 2012Total Wine & More, 510 Lake Drive 19,909 2015Historically, there were six other establishments that had off­sale licenses in the city as shown in the table below.Previous Off­Sale Intoxicating Liquor EstablishmentsName Year ClosedPony Express Bar 1981 (off­sale only)Pauly’s Warehouse Liquors 1989Pass­By Liquors 1997WineStyles2008Century Wine & Spirits 2015Wine & Spirits at 7 & 41 2017RECOMMENDATIONState law and Chanhassen City Code do not limit the number of off­sale liquor licenses allowed in the city. Additionally, it does not set store square footage minimums/maximums, or distance requirements fromchurches/schools or between liquor stores.Staff recommends approval of the off­sale liquor license requested by Target Corporation dba Target Store T­0862 located at 851 West 78th Street.  Approval of the license would be contingent upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy, satisfactory background investigation results, and final approval by the Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Department. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Property Location Map 2. Floor Plan 3. Detailed Floor Plan 4. Affidavit of Mailing of Public Hearing Notice Property Card Taxpayer Information Property Address Parcel Information Building Information Miscellaneous Information Assessor Information Ta xp ayer N ameTARGET CORPORATION T-0862 Mailin g Address PO BO X 94 56 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-9456 Parcel ID Number 25184 0010 Address 851 78TH ST W City CHANHASSEN, MN 55317 Uses Comme rcial GIS Acre sDeeded AcresPlatLotBlock 10.08 Ta x Description Bu ilding Style Year Built Garag e Ab ove G radeFinished Sq Ft Be drooms Scho ol District Watershed District Homestead Green Acre s Ag Preserve0112WS 0 64 RIL EY PURG BLU FF N N N Estimated Market Value Land Bu ilding To tal 2016 Value s(Paya ble 2017 )2017 Value s(Paya ble 2018 )Last Sale Date of Sale Sa le Va lue $3,271,900.00 $7,190,000.00 $10,461,900 .00 $3,435,500.00 $6,247,500.00 $11,348,700 .00 ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT The data provided herewith is for reference purposes only. This data is not suitable for legal, engineering, surveying or other similar purposes. Carver County does not guarantee the accuracy of theinformation contained herein. This data is furnished on an ‘as is’ basis and Carver County makes no representations or warranties, either expressed or implied, for the merchantability or fitness of theinformation provided for any purpose. This disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §466.03 and the user of the dataprovided herein acknowledges that Carver County shall not be liable for any damages, and by using this data in any way expressly waives all claims, and agrees to defend, indemnify, and holdharmless Carver County, its officials, officers, agents, employees, etc. from any and all claims brought by anyone who uses the information provided for herein, its employees or agents, orthird parties which arise out of user's access. By acceptance of this data, the user agrees not to transmit this data or provide access to it or any part of it to another party unless the user includeswith the data a copy of this disclaimer. Friday, December 22, 2017 Carver Co unty, MN Net Acre s 10.06 CONDENSING UNIT(WALK-IN COOLER/CONDENSING UNIT(WALK-IN COOLER/TEMPPALLETLOCATIONTEMPPALLETLOCATIONTEMPPALLETLOCATIONVF0778BSK TEMPPALLETLOCATION36-144R (S)96 96 (F)36-144R (S)96 96 (F)36-144R (S)246'C6'X6'6'X36'YE1565 77" WF3953 84" WF3953 84"YE1532 VRBH YE1626 VRBH 91" FRIG WF3959WF3958WF3950WF3960WF3960WF3960WF3960242222 643'3'24242222 643'3'24WF3960WF395284"WF395384"WF395384"WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3952 84" WF3953 84" WF3953 84"YE1569 YE15693384HC84"WF395684"WF3956WALL FINISH LEGENDA.SYMBOL INDICATES RB-1(UNO) LOCATION.SEE PLANS, ELEVATIONS & SCHEDULES FOR ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS. CONTINUE RB-1(UNO) 6" BEHIND FIXTURE @ SALES FLOOR DOORS.C.SYMBOL INDICATES WALLS THAT RECEIVE BOTHK-11 AND RESILIENT BASE. K-11 TO TO A HEIGHT OF 7'-2" ON SALES FLOOR OR 4'-0" AFF IN OFF-STAGE AREAS. FOR K-11 WALL CAP, CORNER GUARD AND END CAP DETAILSSEED.SYMBOL INDICATES WALLS THAT RECEIVE BOTHK-201 AND RESILIENT BASE. K-201 TO TO A HEIGHT OF 7'-2" ON SALES FLOOR OR 4'-0" AFF IN OFF-STAGE AREAS. FORK-201 WALL CAP, CORNER GUARD AND END CAP DETAILSSEEG. SYMBOL INDICATES WALLS THAT RECEIVE BOTHK201-RS AND RESILIENT BASE. TOP OF RUB STRIP AT2'-10 1/2" AFF.A5026A50212A50214A50215A5026A50212A50214A50215NOT USEDNOT USEDNOT USEDCBA10RF-2SEALEDCONCRETEBEERCOOLER129BLIQUORSALES128LIQUORENTRY104RF-2SEALEDCONCRETEIPS 1-204 TO 10'-0" AFFIPS-1, C-36 FROM 10'-0" TO 16'-0"IPS-1, C-38 ABOVE 16'-0" TO STRUCTUREIPS 1-204 TO 10'-0" AFFIPS-1, C-36 FROM 10'-0" TO 16'-0"IPS-1, C-38 ABOVE 16'-0" TO STRUCTUREIPS 1-204 TO 10'-0" AFFIPS-1, C-36 FROM 10'-0" TO 16'-0"IPS-1, C-38 ABOVE 16'-0" TO STRUCTUREA3923A3924A39212STORAGE139MT-3MT-3RF-1RF-1RB-1C BASEIPS-1, C-100 ABOVERB-1C BASEIPS-1, C-100 ABOVERB-1C BASEIPS-1, C-100 ABOVECBA10BEERCOOLER129BLIQUORSALES128LIQUORENTRY104STORAGE139ACT-1@8' - 6" AFFOPEN TO STRUCTUREPAINT STRUCTUREIPS-6, C-3812 GA. HANGER WIRE TYP.HANG P1000 UNISTRUT(PAINT BLACK) SPANNINGBETWEEN ROOF JOISTSABOVE SEE A393102X8 EXTRUDED ALUM.SUSPENDED FRAME. BEAMSSPACED 2'-0" OC, SUPPORTEDBY UNISTRUT AND 12 GAHANGER WIRE SYSTEM. MAXWEIGHT 2 LBS PER SQ FT.B/O CEILING FRAME @ 11;-0" AFFLIGHTING TRACKSTYP SEE ELECTRICAL14'-1"27'-0"9'-7"B/O BEAMS @ 11'-0" AFF18'-6"(N) COOLERCEILINGT/O COOLER CEILING@ 10'-5" AFFPAINT CEILINGIPS-2, C-9GYP. BD CEILING@10' - 0" AFF@10' - 0" AFFCBA10BEERCOOLER129BLIQUORSALES128LIQUORENTRY104A3071F1139STORAGE1391F121'-4"1Q01F1A455133'-4"18'-4"1A393TYPSSSSA3914A3916A3915A3915SIMA3915SIM(N) STAIRS, RETAINING WALL, AND RAMPS SEE CIVIL1E01E01E01F0 F1F0 F1E02'-6"6'-0" 0.C.SAWCUT FOR EAS 1/2" WIDE X 2" DEEP VERIFYEAS PEDESTALSSST CORNER GUARDSTO 4'-0" AFFSTL COLUMN- SEE STRUC1/4"VESTIBULE WALL- SEEELEV FOR GLASS TYPEDOOR JAMBAUTO SLIDING DOORSLNT-1 & BACKER ROD,BOTH SIDES- COLOR TOMATCH STOREFRONTTHRESHOLD BELOWCJ BETWEEN SLABS1/4"6"3"3"9 1/4"1/2"1/2"3/4"5"1/2"7/8"2"STOREFRONT W/ DEEPFACE CAP BELOWSTOREFRONT COLUMNWRAP W/ STD CAP2"6"3"3"1/2"5"1/2"2"10 1/2"STL COLUMN- SEE STRUCSEE ELEV FOR GLASSTYPESTOREFRONT W/ DEEPFACE CAP BELOW1/2"2"DOOR JAMBAUTO SLIDING DOORSLNT-1 & BACKER ROD,BOTH SIDES- COLOR TOMATCH STOREFRONTVESTIBULEELEVATIONS-SEEELEVATIONS FOR GLASSTYPE1'-1 3/8"6"1/2"5"1/2"1/4"STL COLUMN- SEE STRUCSTOREFRONT COLUMNWRAP W/ STD CAP1'-0 7/8"1/2"G1R1000 NICOLLET MALLMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403Drawn ByChecked ByProject NumberProto:P400Version:N/AConfig:LR®www.ctagroup.comI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULYLICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTASIGNATURE:___________________________PRINTED NAME: CAROLYN BERMAN DATE:10-24-17LIC. NO. 2007110/24/2017 3:09:17 PMA391CHANHASSEN, MN851 W 78TH STCHANHASSEN, MN 55317ADULT BEVERAGEDGEDT-0862FLOOR PLAN NOTESSEE SHEET A001 FOR SYMBOLSALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FINISH MATLS OR OPENINGS UNO, EXCLUSIVE OF CERAMIC TILEA.A50118B.FOR DOOR, ROOM FINISH, AND OWNER SUPPLIED MATL & EQUIP SCHEDULES, SEE SHEET A601C.PARTITION TYPES INDICATE LOCATION FOR BLOCKING, FINISHES, ETC. SEE SHEET A601 FOR PARTITION TYPESD.PLYWOOD BLOCKING IS INCLUDED IN PARTITION TYPE, SEE BLOCKING PLAN FOR SIDE OF WALLE.NOT USEDF.ALL ANGLES ARE 45~ OR MULTIPLES OF 45~ UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISEH.FOR STUD WALLS EXTENDING TO (E) ROOFDECK, SEE J.FOR PARTIAL HEIGHT PARTITION BRACING AND FLOOR ATTACHMENT DETAILS - SEETYP A50112A50119K.EXISTING FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ARE TO REMAIN IN THEIR CURRENT LOCATIONS. IF A FIRE EXTINGUISHER NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED DUE TO FIXTURE SHIFTS, THE FIRE EXTINGUISHER & SIGNS OR ASSOCIATED ITEMS ARE TO BE RELOCATED AND INSTALLED NO FARTHER THAN 10'-0" FROM ITS CURRENT LOCATION.FINAL LOCATIONS PENDING FIRE MARSHALWALK-THROUGH INSPECTION.G.REFLECTED CEILING PLAN NOTESACT CEILING GRIDS ARE CENTERED IN ROOMS PER SPECIFICATION 09 5100 CRITERIA UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISEC.D.PROVIDE SLIP CONNECTION AT ALL WALLS EXTENDING TO ROOF OR STRUCTURE - SEEB.VERIFY LOCATIONS OF HANGING DEPARTMENT SIGNS WITH TARGET'S IN STORE MARKETING. LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLYE.PROVIDE QUANTITY AND LOCATION OF DIRECTIONAL/ EXIT SIGNS AS REQUIRED BY FIRE MARSHAL HAVING JURISDICTIONF.REFER TO ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL FOR LIGHT FIXTURE AND DIFFUSER RELOCATION. COORDINATE FOR REMOVAL/ REUSE OF LIGHTS, DIFFUSERS AND SPRINKLER HEADSG.FOR ALIGNMENT OF SPRINKLER IN SALES FLOOR CEILING SEE SPEC, DIV 21SEE SHEET A001 FOR SYMBOLS.A.A50112TYPA50128H.NOT USEDS1WALL LEGEND(E) WALLS TO REMAINNEW WALLSCEILING LEGEND(E) ACT CEILINGNEW ACT CEILING(E) GYP BD CEILINGNEW GYP BD CEILINGSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"A3911ADULT BEVERAGE FINISH PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"A3912ADULT BEVERAGE REFLECTED CEILING PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"A3913ADULT BEVERAGE FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A3914STOREFRONT DOOR @ JAMBSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A3915STOREFRONT JAMBSCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"A3916STOREFRONT JAMB @ DOORDate No. Description10/24/17 COMPLETECONSTRUCTION SET CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Resolution 2018­18: Approve Vacation of Easements at 7721 Erie Avenue (Nustad) Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.2. Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Vacation File No. 2017­02 PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of the public right of way dedicated as the north one­half of the alley dedicated in Block 2, St. Hubertus, lying easterly of Erie Avenue and westerly of the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 12, Block 2, all in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota; retaining a drainage and utility easement over the vacated portion of the alley.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. BACKGROUND The public right of way south of St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 12, and north of St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 1 was platted in 1887 and was intended to be used as an alleyway. This right of way has never been used as an alleyway. Currently, the use of this area is as a portion of the backyards of the lots on this block. Other lots within this plat have has been granted a vacation of the alleyway recently. PROPOSAL The property owner of 7721 Erie Avenue has requested the city vacate the northern half of the right of way adjacent to and south of their parcel located on St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 12. The entire alleyway is not being vacated as part of this request as the remaining southern half of the right of way would be retained to be granted to the parcel located at 7791 Erie Avenue on St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 1. The property owner(s) of this lot would need to propose a separate vacation request to the city to acquire the portion of the right of way adjacent to their property. Currently, the right of way is not being used as an alley and there is no plan for the city to use this area other than for utilities.  Gopher State One Call was contacted and there are existing public and private utilities in the requested vacation area. A public sanitary sewer line and a private buried cable belonging to CenturyLink goes through this right of way. There is also an existing shed within the vacation area that belongs to the property owner at 7791 Erie Avenue. The property owner at 7791 Erie Avenue has agreed to relocate the shed within their parcel limits.  Public and private utilities are located in this right of way, so language is included in the resolution indicating the utility owners' authority shall not be altered by this resolution. A drainage and utility easement is required and included to CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectResolution 2018­18: Approve Vacation of Easements at 7721 Erie Avenue (Nustad)Section PUBLIC HEARINGS Item No: G.2.Prepared By George Bender, Assistant City Engineer File No: Vacation File No. 2017­02PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council adopts a resolution approving the vacation of a portion of the public right of way dedicated as thenorth one­half of the alley dedicated in Block 2, St. Hubertus, lying easterly of Erie Avenue and westerly of thesoutherly extension of the east line of Lot 12, Block 2, all in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota; retaining adrainage and utility easement over the vacated portion of the alley.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.BACKGROUNDThe public right of way south of St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 12, and north of St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 1 was plattedin 1887 and was intended to be used as an alleyway. This right of way has never been used as an alleyway. Currently,the use of this area is as a portion of the backyards of the lots on this block. Other lots within this plat have has beengranted a vacation of the alleyway recently.PROPOSALThe property owner of 7721 Erie Avenue has requested the city vacate the northern half of the right of way adjacentto and south of their parcel located on St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 12. The entire alleyway is not being vacated as partof this request as the remaining southern half of the right of way would be retained to be granted to the parcel locatedat 7791 Erie Avenue on St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 1. The property owner(s) of this lot would need to propose aseparate vacation request to the city to acquire the portion of the right of way adjacent to their property.Currently, the right of way is not being used as an alley and there is no plan for the city to use this area other than forutilities. Gopher State One Call was contacted and there are existing public and private utilities in the requested vacation area.A public sanitary sewer line and a private buried cable belonging to CenturyLink goes through this right of way.There is also an existing shed within the vacation area that belongs to the property owner at 7791 Erie Avenue. Theproperty owner at 7791 Erie Avenue has agreed to relocate the shed within their parcel limits.  Public and private utilities are located in this right of way, so language is included in the resolution indicating the utility owners' authority shall not be altered by this resolution. A drainage and utility easement is required and included to protect the authority for the public and private utilities. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends granting the vacation of the 8­foot wide portion of the right of way dedicated south of St. Hubertus, Block 2, Lot 12 with the condition that a drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the vacated area. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Vacation Survey Vacation Application Published Notice of Public Hearing Affidavit of Mailing Resolution Granting Vacation and Retaining Drainage and Utility Easement 196062v1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION ALLEY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Chanhassen City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, February 12, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Chanhassen City Hall, 7700 Market Boulevard, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §412.851 to consider the vacation of the alley described as: The North one-half of the alley dedicated in Block 2, St. Hubertus, lying easterly of Erie Avenue and westerly of the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 12, Block 2, all in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota; retaining a drainage and utility easement over the vacated portion of the alley. All interested persons are invited to attend this public hearing and express their opinions with respect to this proposal. George Bender, PE Assistant City Engineer Phone: 952-227-1164 196063v1 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA DATE: February 12, 2018 RESOLUTION NO: 2018-XX MOTION BY: SECONDED BY: RESOLUTION VACATING ALLEY AND RETAINING A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, after two (2) weeks’ published and posted notice of the hearing and after mailing written notice of the hearing at least ten (10) days before the hearing to each property owner affected by the proposed vacation, the Chanhassen City Council has conducted a hearing to consider the vacation of the alley legally described on the attached Exhibit “A” (“Vacated Alley”); and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation, the Council has determined that it is in the public interest to vacate the alley and retain a drainage and utility easement over the Vacated Alley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen: 1. The Vacated Alley legally described on the attached Exhibit “A” is hereby vacated retaining a drainage and utility easement over the Vacated Alley. 2. The vacation shall not affect the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling the electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, water pipes, mains and hydrants thereon or thereunder, if any, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such way or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto. 3. The City Manager is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and County Recorder of Carver County. Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 12th day of February 2018. ATTEST: _________________________________ ____________________________________ Todd Gerhardt, City Manager Denny Laufenburger, Mayor YES NO ABSENT 196063v1 2 EXHIBIT A Description of Alley to be vacated: The North one-half of the alley dedicated in Block 2, St. Hubertus, lying easterly of Erie Avenue and westerly of the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 12, Block 2, all in Chanhassen, Carver County, Minnesota; retaining a drainage and utility easement over the vacated portion of the alley. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Award of Bid for Lake Susan Park Ballfield Lighting Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: H.1. Prepared By Todd Hoffman, Park and Recreation Director File No: RA­ 111 (Lake Susan Park, General) PROPOSED MOTION “The City Council approves a Purchase Agreement with Musco Sports Lighting, LLC in the amount of $209,811.00 for LED Foundation to Poletop Lighting System for Lake Susan Park Baseball Field." Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY MUSCO Lighting Systems can be purchased directly by the city through the National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA) cooperative purchase contract #082114­msl insuring the best value for the city.  The city is a member of NJPA and can take advantage of this value pricing.   DISCUSSION This project features new technology LED diode light source fixtures with 52 total light control factory aimed and assembled luminaries. The MUSCO LED Total Light Control system will save the city an estimated $100,193 over a 25­year period as compared to a standard 1500 watt metal halide lighting system (see attached cost of ownership comparison). Cost savings include utility, maintenance, and operational control of lighting system.  In addition, the MUSCO LED Total Light Control system will eliminate unwanted spill light, glare light and sky glow, making the lighting environmentally friendly to residential and traffic areas.   RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approves a Purchase Agreement with Musco Sports Lighting, LLC in the amount of $209,811.00 for LED Foundation to Poletop Lighting System for Lake Susan Park Baseball Field." CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectAward of Bid for Lake Susan Park Ballfield LightingSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.1.Prepared By Todd Hoffman, Park and RecreationDirector File No: RA­ 111 (Lake Susan Park, General)PROPOSED MOTION“The City Council approves a Purchase Agreement with Musco Sports Lighting, LLC in the amount of $209,811.00for LED Foundation to Poletop Lighting System for Lake Susan Park Baseball Field."Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYMUSCO Lighting Systems can be purchased directly by the city through the National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA)cooperative purchase contract #082114­msl insuring the best value for the city.  The city is a member of NJPA andcan take advantage of this value pricing.  DISCUSSIONThis project features new technology LED diode light source fixtures with 52 total light control factory aimed andassembled luminaries. The MUSCO LED Total Light Control system will save the city an estimated $100,193 over a25­year period as compared to a standard 1500 watt metal halide lighting system (see attached cost of ownershipcomparison). Cost savings include utility, maintenance, and operational control of lighting system.  In addition, theMUSCO LED Total Light Control system will eliminate unwanted spill light, glare light and sky glow, making thelighting environmentally friendly to residential and traffic areas.  RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approves a Purchase Agreement with Musco Sports Lighting, LLC in the amount of $209,811.00 for LED Foundation to Poletop Lighting System for Lake Susan Park Baseball Field." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Purchase Agreement 2. 2018 CIP Sheet PK&T ­ 139 3. 25­Year Cost of Ownership Comparison 4. Control System Summary 5. Project Specifications Control System Summary Project Information Project #:168869 Project Name:Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball Date:01/29/18 Project Engineer:WHartl Sales Representative:Craig Gallop Control System Type:Control and Monitoring Communication Type:Digital Cellular Scan:168869-R3-370 Document ID:168869P1V3-0129155538 Distribution Panel Location or ID:Verify Total # of Distribution Panel Locations for Project:1 Design Voltage/Hertz/Phase:480/60/1 Control Voltage:120 Project Specific Notes: Materials Checklist Contractor/Customer Supplied: A single control circuit must be supplied per distribution panel location. If the control voltage is NOT available, a control transformer is required. Electrical distribution panel to provide overcurrent protection for circuits Thermal/Magnetic circuit breaker sized per full load amps on Circuit Summary by Zone Chart Wiring: Dedicated control power circuit Power circuit to and from lighting contactors Harnesses for cabinets at remote locations Means of grounding, including lightning ground protection Electrical conduit wireway system Entrance hubs rated NEMA 4: must be die-cast zinc, PVC, or copper-free die-cast aluminum Mounting hardware for cabinets Control circuit lock-on device to prevent unauthorized power interruption to control power Anti-corrosion compound to apply to ends of wire, if necessary Call Control-Link Central TM operations center at 877/347-3319 to schedule activation of the control system upon completion of the installation. Note: Activation may take up to 1 1/2 hours Equipment Listing DESCRIPTION APPROXIMATE SIZE 1.Control and Monitoring Cabinet 24 X 72 QTY SIZE Total Contactors 7 30 AMP Total Off/On/Auto Switches: 2 IMPORTANT NOTES 1. Please confirm that the design voltage listed above is accurate for this facility. Design voltage/phase is defined as the voltage/phase being connected and utilized at each lighting pole's ballast enclosure disconnect. Inaccurate design voltage/phase can result in additional costs and delays. Contact your Musco sales representative to confirm this item. 2. In a 3 phase design, all 3 phases are to be run to each pole. When a 3 phase design is used Musco's single phase luminaires come pre-wired to utilize all 3 phases across the entire facility. 3. One contactor is required for each pole. When a pole has multiple circuits, one contactor is required for each circuit. All contactors are UL 100% rated for the published continuous load. All contactors are 3 pole. 4. If the lighting system will be fed from more than one distribution location, additional equipment may be required. Contact your Musco sales representative. 5. A single control circuit must be supplied per control system. 6. Size overcurrent devices using the full load amps column of the Circuit Summary By Zone chart- Minimum power factor is 0.9. NOTE: Refer to Installation Instructions for more details on equipment information and the installation requirements C 1999,2018 Musco Sports Lighting,LLC Form: T-5030-1T:\168\168869P1V3-0129155538.pdf Control System Summary Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball / 168869 - 168869-R3-370 Verify - Page 2 of 4 T:\168\168869P1V3-0129155538.pdf Control System Summary Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball / 168869 - 168869-R3-370 Verify - Page 3 of 4 T:\168\168869P1V3-0129155538.pdf CONTROL POWER CONSUMPTION 120V Single Phase VA loading of Musco Supplied Equipment INRUSH: 2303.0 SEALED: 272.8 SWITCHING SCHEDULE Field/Zone Description Zones Baseball 1 Batting Cage 2 CIRCUIT SUMMARY BY ZONE POLE CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION # OF FIXTURES # OF DRIVERS *FULL LOAD AMPS CONTACTOR SIZE (AMPS) CONTACTOR ID ZONE A1 Baseball 7 7 19.1 30 C1 1 A2 Baseball 7 7 19.1 30 C2 1 B1 Baseball 9 9 25.1 30 C3 1 B2 Baseball 9 9 25.1 30 C4 1 C1 Baseball 9 9 23.5 30 C5 1 C2 Baseball 9 9 23.5 30 C6 1 B1 Batting Cage 2 1 2.1 30 C7 2 *Full Load Amps based on amps per driver. Control System Summary Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball / 168869 - 168869-R3-370 Verify - Page 4 of 4 T:\168\168869P1V3-0129155538.pdf PANEL SUMMARY CABINET # CONTROL MODULE LOCATION CONTACTOR ID CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION FULL LOAD AMPS DISTRIBUTION PANEL ID (BY OTHERS) CIRCUIT BREAKER POSITION (BY OTHERS) 1 1 C1 Pole A1 19.14 1 1 C2 Pole A2 19.14 1 1 C3 Pole B1 25.06 1 1 C4 Pole B2 25.06 1 1 C5 Pole C1 23.48 1 1 C6 Pole C2 23.48 1 1 C7 Pole B1 2.14 ZONE SCHEDULE CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION ZONE SELECTOR SWITCH ZONE DESCRIPTION POLE ID CONTACTOR ID Zone 1 1 Baseball A1 C1 A2 C2 B1 C3 B2 C4 C1 C5 C2 C6 Zone 2 2 Batting Cage B1 C7 PROJECT SUMMARY Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2018 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGN By: • File #168869-R3-370 • 29-Jan-18 NOTES:Verify all pole locationsChanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball Chanhassen,MN LighƟng System Pole / Fixture Summary Pole ID Pole Height Mtg Height Fixture Qty Luminaire Type Load Group A1-A2 70'15'1 TLC-BT-575 0.58 kW A 70'6 TLC-LED-1150 6.90 kW A B1 80'15'1 TLC-BT-575 0.58 kW A 80'8 TLC-LED-1150 9.20 kW A 60'2 TLC-LED-400 0.80 kW B B2 80'15'1 TLC-BT-575 0.58 kW A 80'8 TLC-LED-1150 9.20 kW A C1-C2 70'15'2 TLC-BT-575 1.15 kW A 70'7 TLC-LED-1150 8.05 kW A 6 52 53.70 kW Group Summary Group Description Load Fixture Qty A Baseball 52.9 kW 50 B Batting Cage 0.8 kW 2 Fixture Type Summary Type Source Wattage Lumens L90 L80 L70 Quantity TLC-LED-1150 LED 5700K - 75 CRI 1150W 121,000 >51,000 >51,000 >51,000 42 TLC-BT-575 LED 5700K - 75 CRI 575W 52,000 ------8 TLC-LED-400 LED 5700K - 75 CRI 400W 38,600 61,000 >72,000 >72,000 2 Light Level Summary Calculation Grid Summary IlluminationGrid Name Calculation Metric Ave Min Max Max/Min Ave/Min Groups Fixture Qty Additional Grid Horizontal 38.4 31.8 47.5 1.50 1.21 A 50 BTF Horizontal 7.76 0 60 0.00 A 50 BTF Perpendicular 11 0 43 96.18 A 50 Baseball (Infield)Horizontal Illuminance 50.9 36 59 1.63 1.41 A 50 Baseball (Outfield)Horizontal Illuminance 31.6 21 48 2.24 1.50 A 50 Batting Cage Horizontal 10.8 6 16 2.82 1.81 B 2 ILLUMINATION SUMMARY Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2018 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGN By: • File #168869-R3-370 • 29-Jan-18 C1 C2 A1 A2 B1 B2 51 58 46 50 54 48 44 29 29 28 23 58 47 49 55 59 48 44 35 30 37 36 24 46 49 52 53 50 45 35 31 32 37 39 31 50 55 53 48 43 38 33 31 32 36 33 32 54 59 50 43 36 31 27 27 29 30 30 23 48 47 45 38 31 25 23 23 26 27 35 22 44 44 35 33 27 23 22 23 27 31 43 32 29 35 31 31 27 24 24 23 24 31 39 24 29 30 32 32 29 27 28 25 26 26 27 28 37 37 37 30 28 32 33 26 21 23 36 39 34 31 37 44 40 27 24 30 30 22 21 31 50'75'75'50'185'44'328'119'119'326'44'185' SCALE IN FEET 1 : 100 0'100'200' EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole Luminaires QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADE ELEVATION MOUNTING HEIGHT LUMINAIRE TYPE QTY / POLE THIS GRID OTHER GRIDS2A1-A2 70'-15' 70' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 1 6 1 6 0 0 1 B1 80'-15' 60' 80' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-400 TLC-LED-1150 1 2 8 1 0 8 0 2 0 1 B2 80'-15' 80' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 1 8 1 8 0 0 2 C1-C2 70'-15' 70' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 2 7 2 7 0 0 6 TOTALS 52 50 2 Pole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟve to 0,0 reference point(s) Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball Chanhassen,MN GRID SUMMARY Name: Baseball Size: Irregular 321' / 372' / 319' Spacing: 30.0' x 30.0' Height: 3.0' above grade ILLUMINATION SUMMARY MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES InĮeld Ouƞield Guaranteed Average:50 30 Scan Average:50.87 31.56 Maximum:59 48 Minimum:36 21 Avg / Min:1.40 1.48 Guaranteed Max / Min:2 2.5 Max / Min:1.63 2.24 UG (adjacent pts):1.27 1.72 CU:0.75 No. of Points:25 106 LUMINAIRE INFORMATION Color / CRI: 5700K - 75 CRI Luminaire Output: 121,000 / 52,000 lumens No. of Luminaires: 50 Total Load: 52.9 kW Lumen Maintenance Luminaire Type L90 hrs L80 hrs L70 hrs TLC-LED-1150 >51,000 >51,000 >51,000 TLC-BT-575 ------ Reported per TM-21-11. See luminaire datasheet for details. Guaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed per your Musco Warranty document and includes a 0.95 dirt depreciaƟon factor. Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary from computer-calculated predicƟons and should be taken in accordance with IESNA RP-6-15. Electrical System Requirements:Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3% nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structures located within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. NOTES:Verify all pole locations ILLUMINATION SUMMARY Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2018 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGN By: • File #168869-R3-370 • 29-Jan-18 C1 C2 A1 A2 B1 B2 31.79 32.27 41.53 47.29 40.35 32.49 34.38 35.27 47.52 46.86 36.01 34.51 SCALE IN FEET 1 : 100 0'100'200' EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole Luminaires QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADE ELEVATION MOUNTING HEIGHT LUMINAIRE TYPE QTY / POLE THIS GRID OTHER GRIDS2A1-A2 70'-15' 70' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 1 6 1 6 0 0 1 B1 80'-15' 60' 80' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-400 TLC-LED-1150 1 2 8 1 0 8 0 2 0 1 B2 80'-15' 80' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 1 8 1 8 0 0 2 C1-C2 70'-15' 70' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 2 7 2 7 0 0 6 TOTALS 52 50 2 Pole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟve to 0,0 reference point(s) Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball Chanhassen,MN GRID SUMMARY Name:AddiƟonal Grid Spacing: 30.0' Height: 3.0' above grade ILLUMINATION SUMMARY MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES EnƟre Grid Scan Average:38.3560 Maximum:47.52 Minimum:31.79 No. of Points:12 LUMINAIRE INFORMATION Color / CRI: 5700K - 75 CRI Luminaire Output: 121,000 / 52,000 lumens No. of Luminaires: 50 Total Load: 52.9 kW Lumen Maintenance Luminaire Type L90 hrs L80 hrs L70 hrs TLC-LED-1150 >51,000 >51,000 >51,000 TLC-BT-575 ------ Reported per TM-21-11. See luminaire datasheet for details. Guaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed per your Musco Warranty document and includes a 0.95 dirt depreciaƟon factor. Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary from computer-calculated predicƟons and should be taken in accordance with IESNA RP-6-15. Electrical System Requirements:Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3% nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structures located within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. NOTES:Verify all pole locations ILLUMINATION SUMMARY Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2018 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGN By: • File #168869-R3-370 • 29-Jan-18 B1 6 8 10 12 15 14 12 7 7 9 12 14 16 16 13 8 7 8 10 13 14 15 14 10 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 10 185'44' SCALE IN FEET 1 : 30 0'30'60' EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole Luminaires QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADE ELEVATION MOUNTING HEIGHT LUMINAIRE TYPE QTY / POLE THIS GRID OTHER GRIDS1B180'-15' 60' 80' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-400 TLC-LED-1150 1 2 8 0 2 0 1 0 8 1 TOTALS 11 2 9 Pole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟve to 0,0 reference point(s) Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball Chanhassen,MN GRID SUMMARY Name:Baƫng Cage Size: Irregular 321' / 372' / 319' Spacing: 10.0' x 10.0' Height: 3.0' above grade ILLUMINATION SUMMARY MAINTAINED HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES EnƟre Grid Scan Average:10.83 Maximum:16 Minimum:6 Avg / Min:1.94 Max / Min:2.82 UG (adjacent pts):1.67 CU:0.50 No. of Points:32 LUMINAIRE INFORMATION Color / CRI: 5700K - 75 CRI Luminaire Output: 38,600 lumens No. of Luminaires: 2 Total Load: 0.8 kW Lumen Maintenance Luminaire Type L90 hrs L80 hrs L70 hrs TLC-LED-400 61,000 >72,000 >72,000 Reported per TM-21-11. See luminaire datasheet for details. Guaranteed Performance:The ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed per your Musco Warranty document and includes a 0.95 dirt depreciaƟon factor. Field Measurements:Individual Įeld measurements may vary from computer-calculated predicƟons and should be taken in accordance with IESNA RP-6-15. Electrical System Requirements:Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3% nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structures located within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. NOTES:Verify all pole locations EQUIPMENT LAYOUT Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2018 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGN By: • File #168869-R3-370 • 29-Jan-18 Baseball Irregular 19 L224 25 20 L224 24 21 23 22 L224 C1 26 27 28 L224 34 L224 29 L224 33 L224 30 L224 32 31 L224 C2 35 36 1 6 2 5 L224 3 L224 4 L224 A1 7 46 51 47 L224 50 48 L224 49 L224 A2 52 8 11 9 L224 10 L224 12 L224 15 L224 13 L224 14 L224 B1 18 16 17 37 40 38 L224 39 L224 41 L224 44 L224 42 L224 43 L224 B2 45 50'75'75'50'185'44'328'119'119'326'44'185' SCALE IN FEET 1 : 80 0'80'160' Pole locaƟon(s)dimensions are relaƟve to 0,0 reference point(s) Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball Chanhassen,MN EQUIPMENT LAYOUT INCLUDES: · Baseball Electrical System Requirements:Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. InstallaƟon Requirements:Results assume ± 3% nominal voltage at line side of the driver and structures located within 3 feet (1m) of design locaƟons. EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWN Pole Luminaires QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADE ELEVATION MOUNTING HEIGHT LUMINAIRE TYPE QTY / POLE 2 A1-A2 70'-15' 70' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 1 6 1 B1 80'-15' 60' 80' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-400 TLC-LED-1150 1 2 8 1 B2 80'-15' 80' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 1 8 2 C1-C2 70'-15' 70' TLC-BT-575 TLC-LED-1150 2 7 6 TOTALS 52 SINGLE LUMINAIRE AMPERAGE DRAW CHART Ballast SpeciĮcaƟons (.90 min power factor) Line Amperage Per Luminaire (max draw) Single Phase Voltage 208 (60) 220 (60) 240 (60) 277 (60) 347 (60) 380 (60) 480 (60) TLC-LED-1150 6.8 6.5 5.9 5.1 4.1 3.7 3.0 TLC-BT-575 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.4 TLC-LED-400 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.1 NOTES:Verify all pole locations ENVIRONMENTAL GLARE IMPACT Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2018 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC.ENGINEERED DESIGN By: • File #168869-R3-370 • 29-Jan-18 Candelas: +150,000 100,000 50,000 5,000 1,000 500 250 Chanhassen Lake Susan Youth Baseball Chanhassen,MN GLARE IMPACT Summary Map indicates the maximum candela an observer would see when facing the brightest light source from any direcƟon. A well-designed lighƟng system controls light to provide maximum useful on-Įeld illuminaƟon with minimal destrucƟve oī-site glare. GLARE Candela Levels High Glare: 150,000 or more candela Should only occur on or very near the lit area where the light source is in direct view. Care must be taken to minimize high glare zones. SigniĮcant Glare: 25,000 to 75,000 candela Equivalent to high beam headlights of a car. Minimal to No Glare: 500 or less candela Equivalent to 100W incandescent light bulb. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Variance Request: 3617 Red Cedar Point Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: H.2. Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­01 PROPOSED MOTION The Chanhassen City Council approves an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.” (Note:A motion for denial and asociated Findings of Fact are also included at the end of the report.) Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY On January 8, 2018, staff received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of this variance request. Section 20­29(d) of the City Code allows any aggrieved person to appeal a variance decision to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the Community Development Director within four business days of the Planning Commission’s decision. Section 20­29(e) grants the City Council the authority to reverse, affirm, or modify, wholly or partly, the decision appealed from the Planning Commission by a majority vote. The parcel’s existing house is over 90 years old, does not meet the city’s minimum standards for single­family dwellings, and is in disrepair. This structure is located 52.9 feet from the lake’s ordinary high water setback and the lot currently has 36.36 percent lot coverage, largely due to the fact that the front portion of the lot is covered by a gravel parking area. The applicant requires variances to replace the existing structure with a modern home. They are requesting a variance to maintain the existing 22.1­foot encroachment into the required shoreland setback. As part of their project they are proposing removing the gravel parking area, a shed located within the western side yard setback, an outdoor fireplace area, and a concrete walkway in the rear yard in order to bring the property more in line with City Code. Removing the shed will bring the property’s side yard setback into compliance with City Code. Removing the property’s existing lot coverage and replacing it with a new home, driveway and patio area will reduce the nonconforming lot coverage by .36 percent, requiring an 11 percent lot coverage variance. They are also requesting an 11.5­foot front yard setback variance since they believe the parcel’s size and existing lake setback make it impractical to construct a house and garage while meeting the property’s 30­foot front yard setback. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectVariance Request: 3617 Red Cedar PointSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­01PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council approves an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­foot lakeshore setback, and an 11percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact andDecision.”(Note:A motion for denial and asociated Findings of Fact are also included at the end of the report.)Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn January 8, 2018, staff received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of this variance request. Section20­29(d) of the City Code allows any aggrieved person to appeal a variance decision to the City Council by filing awritten appeal with the Community Development Director within four business days of the Planning Commission’sdecision. Section 20­29(e) grants the City Council the authority to reverse, affirm, or modify, wholly or partly, thedecision appealed from the Planning Commission by a majority vote.The parcel’s existing house is over 90 years old, does not meet the city’s minimum standards for single­familydwellings, and is in disrepair. This structure is located 52.9 feet from the lake’s ordinary high water setback and the lotcurrently has 36.36 percent lot coverage, largely due to the fact that the front portion of the lot is covered by a gravelparking area.The applicant requires variances to replace the existing structure with a modern home. They are requesting a varianceto maintain the existing 22.1­foot encroachment into the required shoreland setback. As part of their project they areproposing removing the gravel parking area, a shed located within the western side yard setback, an outdoor fireplacearea, and a concrete walkway in the rear yard in order to bring the property more in line with City Code. Removingthe shed will bring the property’s side yard setback into compliance with City Code. Removing the property’s existinglot coverage and replacing it with a new home, driveway and patio area will reduce the nonconforming lot coverage by.36 percent, requiring an 11 percent lot coverage variance. They are also requesting an 11.5­foot front yard setbackvariance since they believe the parcel’s size and existing lake setback make it impractical to construct a house and garage while meeting the property’s 30­foot front yard setback. BACKGROUND On January 2, 2018 the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice.The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and voted 5­0 to approve the variance. During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following Concerns: 1. Commissioner Tietz expressed concern over the narrowness of the road and access issues that will be created CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectVariance Request: 3617 Red Cedar PointSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­01PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council approves an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­foot lakeshore setback, and an 11percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact andDecision.”(Note:A motion for denial and asociated Findings of Fact are also included at the end of the report.)Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn January 8, 2018, staff received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of this variance request. Section20­29(d) of the City Code allows any aggrieved person to appeal a variance decision to the City Council by filing awritten appeal with the Community Development Director within four business days of the Planning Commission’sdecision. Section 20­29(e) grants the City Council the authority to reverse, affirm, or modify, wholly or partly, thedecision appealed from the Planning Commission by a majority vote.The parcel’s existing house is over 90 years old, does not meet the city’s minimum standards for single­familydwellings, and is in disrepair. This structure is located 52.9 feet from the lake’s ordinary high water setback and the lotcurrently has 36.36 percent lot coverage, largely due to the fact that the front portion of the lot is covered by a gravelparking area.The applicant requires variances to replace the existing structure with a modern home. They are requesting a varianceto maintain the existing 22.1­foot encroachment into the required shoreland setback. As part of their project they areproposing removing the gravel parking area, a shed located within the western side yard setback, an outdoor fireplacearea, and a concrete walkway in the rear yard in order to bring the property more in line with City Code. Removingthe shed will bring the property’s side yard setback into compliance with City Code. Removing the property’s existinglot coverage and replacing it with a new home, driveway and patio area will reduce the nonconforming lot coverage by.36 percent, requiring an 11 percent lot coverage variance. They are also requesting an 11.5­foot front yard setbackvariance since they believe the parcel’s size and existing lake setback make it impractical to construct a house andgarage while meeting the property’s 30­foot front yard setback.BACKGROUNDOn January 2, 2018 the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at itsregularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on theproposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice.The Planning Commission heard testimony from allinterested persons wishing to speak and voted 5­0 to approve the variance.During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following Concerns: 1. Commissioner Tietz expressed concern over the narrowness of the road and access issues that will be created by construction activities. Staff indicated that the applicant’s contractors would need to work with Engineering and Building to minimize obstruction, but that issue was unavoidable. The applicant stated that he owned another property in the area which would be used as a staging area to partially mitigate these issues. 2. Commissioner Tietz expressed concern that the proposed pervious pavers be properly designed and installed. Staff stated that the design would need to conform to the Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute’s guidelines and would need to be approved by our Engineering Department. 3. Chairman Aller asked if Public Safety had expressed concern with the proposal. Staff indicated that they had not. 4. Commissioner Weick wanted to know how much additional driveway length would be needed to accommodate two standard cars. Staff estimated an additional 4 feet would be required. The applicant stated that since his daughter drives a jeep, he believes he can fit two to three cars in the proposed driveway. 5. The Commission asked for clarification on the average parking in the area. Staff clarified that they believed most homes in the area did have driveway space for two cars, with an estimated average of 4.5 parking spaces between garages and driveway parking. 6. The Commission asked if staff felt the site’s management of water resources was being improved. Water Resources Coordinator Strong indicated that she felt it was probably as close as possible to an equal trade. 7. Commissioner Weick expressed disappointment that the lot coverage was not being more significantly reduced. 8. Commissioners Madsen and Tietz expressed concerns about the limited driveway parking. 9. Chairman Aller expressed concern about the potential impact to the lake. During the Public Hearing, the following concerns were raised: 1. Debbie Lockhart expressed concerns about snow removal and snow storage, stating that the snowplow currently uses the property for a turnaround and snow storage area. City Engineer Oehme indicated that he had spoken with the plow driver and feels that the city can use its extra right of way along the end of Red Cedar Point Road to facilitate snow removal and snow storage. 2. Steve Gunther expressed concerns about how the lot coverage variance will impact the lake via increased runoff. He requested that the Commission look at it is a variance from the 25 percent standard, noting that the home could be reconfigured to reduce the required lot coverage. On January 8, 2018, staff received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the variance request. On January 22, 2018 the City Council meeting during which the appeal was scheduled to be heard was canceled. Staff notified the applicant and appellant that the appeal would be rescheduled for the February 12, 2018 City Council meeting. Staff also extend the 60 day review deadline for this item. DISCUSSION Front Yard Setback: The primary concern was if the length of the applicant's proposed driveway could provide a reasonable amount of off­ street parking. The proposed driveway varies between 16 feet long at its longest point and 10 feet long at its shortest point. The applicant has stated that they can fit two to three cars in the proposed driveway due to the fact that his daughter drives a jeep. Staff agrees that the driveway could accommodate a jeep and second mid­sized car, but is skeptical that it could accommodate a third car. Most properties in the neighborhood have two­car garages and driveways that can fit an additional two cars.  The applicant’s proposal calls for a three­car garage and a driveway that can fit two cars, assuming one car is compact. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectVariance Request: 3617 Red Cedar PointSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­01PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council approves an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­foot lakeshore setback, and an 11percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact andDecision.”(Note:A motion for denial and asociated Findings of Fact are also included at the end of the report.)Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn January 8, 2018, staff received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of this variance request. Section20­29(d) of the City Code allows any aggrieved person to appeal a variance decision to the City Council by filing awritten appeal with the Community Development Director within four business days of the Planning Commission’sdecision. Section 20­29(e) grants the City Council the authority to reverse, affirm, or modify, wholly or partly, thedecision appealed from the Planning Commission by a majority vote.The parcel’s existing house is over 90 years old, does not meet the city’s minimum standards for single­familydwellings, and is in disrepair. This structure is located 52.9 feet from the lake’s ordinary high water setback and the lotcurrently has 36.36 percent lot coverage, largely due to the fact that the front portion of the lot is covered by a gravelparking area.The applicant requires variances to replace the existing structure with a modern home. They are requesting a varianceto maintain the existing 22.1­foot encroachment into the required shoreland setback. As part of their project they areproposing removing the gravel parking area, a shed located within the western side yard setback, an outdoor fireplacearea, and a concrete walkway in the rear yard in order to bring the property more in line with City Code. Removingthe shed will bring the property’s side yard setback into compliance with City Code. Removing the property’s existinglot coverage and replacing it with a new home, driveway and patio area will reduce the nonconforming lot coverage by.36 percent, requiring an 11 percent lot coverage variance. They are also requesting an 11.5­foot front yard setbackvariance since they believe the parcel’s size and existing lake setback make it impractical to construct a house andgarage while meeting the property’s 30­foot front yard setback.BACKGROUNDOn January 2, 2018 the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at itsregularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on theproposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice.The Planning Commission heard testimony from allinterested persons wishing to speak and voted 5­0 to approve the variance.During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following Concerns:1. Commissioner Tietz expressed concern over the narrowness of the road and access issues that will be createdby construction activities. Staff indicated that the applicant’s contractors would need to work with Engineeringand Building to minimize obstruction, but that issue was unavoidable. The applicant stated that he ownedanother property in the area which would be used as a staging area to partially mitigate these issues.2. Commissioner Tietz expressed concern that the proposed pervious pavers be properly designed and installed.Staff stated that the design would need to conform to the Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute’s guidelinesand would need to be approved by our Engineering Department.3. Chairman Aller asked if Public Safety had expressed concern with the proposal. Staff indicated that they hadnot.4. Commissioner Weick wanted to know how much additional driveway length would be needed to accommodatetwo standard cars. Staff estimated an additional 4 feet would be required. The applicant stated that since hisdaughter drives a jeep, he believes he can fit two to three cars in the proposed driveway.5. The Commission asked for clarification on the average parking in the area. Staff clarified that they believed mosthomes in the area did have driveway space for two cars, with an estimated average of 4.5 parking spacesbetween garages and driveway parking.6. The Commission asked if staff felt the site’s management of water resources was being improved. WaterResources Coordinator Strong indicated that she felt it was probably as close as possible to an equal trade.7. Commissioner Weick expressed disappointment that the lot coverage was not being more significantly reduced.8. Commissioners Madsen and Tietz expressed concerns about the limited driveway parking.9. Chairman Aller expressed concern about the potential impact to the lake.During the Public Hearing, the following concerns were raised:1. Debbie Lockhart expressed concerns about snow removal and snow storage, stating that the snowplowcurrently uses the property for a turnaround and snow storage area. City Engineer Oehme indicated that he hadspoken with the plow driver and feels that the city can use its extra right of way along the end of Red CedarPoint Road to facilitate snow removal and snow storage.2. Steve Gunther expressed concerns about how the lot coverage variance will impact the lake via increasedrunoff. He requested that the Commission look at it is a variance from the 25 percent standard, noting that thehome could be reconfigured to reduce the required lot coverage.On January 8, 2018, staff received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the variance request.On January 22, 2018 the City Council meeting during which the appeal was scheduled to be heard was canceled.Staff notified the applicant and appellant that the appeal would be rescheduled for the February 12, 2018 City Councilmeeting. Staff also extend the 60 day review deadline for this item.DISCUSSIONFront Yard Setback:The primary concern was if the length of the applicant's proposed driveway could provide a reasonable amount of off­street parking. The proposed driveway varies between 16 feet long at its longest point and 10 feet long at its shortestpoint. The applicant has stated that they can fit two to three cars in the proposed driveway due to the fact that hisdaughter drives a jeep. Staff agrees that the driveway could accommodate a jeep and second mid­sized car, but isskeptical that it could accommodate a third car. Most properties in the neighborhood have two­car garages and driveways that can fit an additional two cars.  The applicant’s proposal calls for a three­car garage and a driveway that can fit two cars, assuming one car is compact. Lot Coverage: The proposed 34­square foot reduction in lot coverage would still leave the property 11 percent over the parcel's 25­ percent limit. The property’s stormwater management will be improved by the installation of a 20­foot buffer, the use of permeable pavers for the driveway and patio areas, and a shoreline restoration project. While permeable pavers do not provide the same benefits as vegetative cover, they can reduce stormwater runoff. Utilizing permeable pavers means that while the property will still have 36 percent lot coverage, only 29.67 percent of that will be impervious surface. Given the nonconforming nature of the property, staff believes this is an acceptable proposal. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. A title search for the property should be conducted to ensure any/all existing easements are documented. 3. A new 1” = 20’ scale survey should be provided as part of the building permit application clearly showing the propose setbacks and lot coverage for the proposed house and structures. 4. At least one tree must be planted in front yard, if one is not present after construction. 5. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits across the entire south side.  This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities beyond those indicated in the tree removal plan shall be replaced. 6. No equipment may be stored within the tree protection area. 7. Appropriate tree protection measures must be taken to protect the rear yard ash from EAB. 8. The 162­square foot rear patio area is understood to be the property’s water­oriented structure. 9. Lot coverage may not exceed 3,319 square feet. 10. The proposed rear patio and driveway areas must be constructed using pervious paver systems. 11 . A permanent 20­foot wide native vegetated buffer must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype with permanent buffer monuments. The buffer may work around the path and stairs. The buffer must be designed and installed by an experienced professional in native shoreline restoration. Design plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator. 12. The property owner must work with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to identify and implement any shoreline restoration projects that would improve ecosystem health and function. Replacing rip rap with bioengineering solutions is one example. Should the City Council deny the variance request, it is recommended that the City Council adopt the following motion and attached Findings of Fact and Decision: “The Chanhassen City Council denies a variance request to allow an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­ foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.” CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018SubjectVariance Request: 3617 Red Cedar PointSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.2.Prepared By MacKenzie Walters, Assistant Planner File No: PC 2018­01PROPOSED MOTIONThe Chanhassen City Council approves an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­foot lakeshore setback, and an 11percent lot coverage variance subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact andDecision.”(Note:A motion for denial and asociated Findings of Fact are also included at the end of the report.)Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYOn January 8, 2018, staff received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of this variance request. Section20­29(d) of the City Code allows any aggrieved person to appeal a variance decision to the City Council by filing awritten appeal with the Community Development Director within four business days of the Planning Commission’sdecision. Section 20­29(e) grants the City Council the authority to reverse, affirm, or modify, wholly or partly, thedecision appealed from the Planning Commission by a majority vote.The parcel’s existing house is over 90 years old, does not meet the city’s minimum standards for single­familydwellings, and is in disrepair. This structure is located 52.9 feet from the lake’s ordinary high water setback and the lotcurrently has 36.36 percent lot coverage, largely due to the fact that the front portion of the lot is covered by a gravelparking area.The applicant requires variances to replace the existing structure with a modern home. They are requesting a varianceto maintain the existing 22.1­foot encroachment into the required shoreland setback. As part of their project they areproposing removing the gravel parking area, a shed located within the western side yard setback, an outdoor fireplacearea, and a concrete walkway in the rear yard in order to bring the property more in line with City Code. Removingthe shed will bring the property’s side yard setback into compliance with City Code. Removing the property’s existinglot coverage and replacing it with a new home, driveway and patio area will reduce the nonconforming lot coverage by.36 percent, requiring an 11 percent lot coverage variance. They are also requesting an 11.5­foot front yard setbackvariance since they believe the parcel’s size and existing lake setback make it impractical to construct a house andgarage while meeting the property’s 30­foot front yard setback.BACKGROUNDOn January 2, 2018 the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at itsregularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on theproposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice.The Planning Commission heard testimony from allinterested persons wishing to speak and voted 5­0 to approve the variance.During the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed the following Concerns:1. Commissioner Tietz expressed concern over the narrowness of the road and access issues that will be createdby construction activities. Staff indicated that the applicant’s contractors would need to work with Engineeringand Building to minimize obstruction, but that issue was unavoidable. The applicant stated that he ownedanother property in the area which would be used as a staging area to partially mitigate these issues.2. Commissioner Tietz expressed concern that the proposed pervious pavers be properly designed and installed.Staff stated that the design would need to conform to the Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute’s guidelinesand would need to be approved by our Engineering Department.3. Chairman Aller asked if Public Safety had expressed concern with the proposal. Staff indicated that they hadnot.4. Commissioner Weick wanted to know how much additional driveway length would be needed to accommodatetwo standard cars. Staff estimated an additional 4 feet would be required. The applicant stated that since hisdaughter drives a jeep, he believes he can fit two to three cars in the proposed driveway.5. The Commission asked for clarification on the average parking in the area. Staff clarified that they believed mosthomes in the area did have driveway space for two cars, with an estimated average of 4.5 parking spacesbetween garages and driveway parking.6. The Commission asked if staff felt the site’s management of water resources was being improved. WaterResources Coordinator Strong indicated that she felt it was probably as close as possible to an equal trade.7. Commissioner Weick expressed disappointment that the lot coverage was not being more significantly reduced.8. Commissioners Madsen and Tietz expressed concerns about the limited driveway parking.9. Chairman Aller expressed concern about the potential impact to the lake.During the Public Hearing, the following concerns were raised:1. Debbie Lockhart expressed concerns about snow removal and snow storage, stating that the snowplowcurrently uses the property for a turnaround and snow storage area. City Engineer Oehme indicated that he hadspoken with the plow driver and feels that the city can use its extra right of way along the end of Red CedarPoint Road to facilitate snow removal and snow storage.2. Steve Gunther expressed concerns about how the lot coverage variance will impact the lake via increasedrunoff. He requested that the Commission look at it is a variance from the 25 percent standard, noting that thehome could be reconfigured to reduce the required lot coverage.On January 8, 2018, staff received an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the variance request.On January 22, 2018 the City Council meeting during which the appeal was scheduled to be heard was canceled.Staff notified the applicant and appellant that the appeal would be rescheduled for the February 12, 2018 City Councilmeeting. Staff also extend the 60 day review deadline for this item.DISCUSSIONFront Yard Setback:The primary concern was if the length of the applicant's proposed driveway could provide a reasonable amount of off­street parking. The proposed driveway varies between 16 feet long at its longest point and 10 feet long at its shortestpoint. The applicant has stated that they can fit two to three cars in the proposed driveway due to the fact that hisdaughter drives a jeep. Staff agrees that the driveway could accommodate a jeep and second mid­sized car, but isskeptical that it could accommodate a third car. Most properties in the neighborhood have two­car garages anddriveways that can fit an additional two cars.  The applicant’s proposal calls for a three­car garage and a driveway thatcan fit two cars, assuming one car is compact.Lot Coverage:The proposed 34­square foot reduction in lot coverage would still leave the property 11 percent over the parcel's 25­percent limit. The property’s stormwater management will be improved by the installation of a 20­foot buffer, the useof permeable pavers for the driveway and patio areas, and a shoreline restoration project. While permeable pavers donot provide the same benefits as vegetative cover, they can reduce stormwater runoff. Utilizing permeable paversmeans that while the property will still have 36 percent lot coverage, only 29.67 percent of that will be impervioussurface. Given the nonconforming nature of the property, staff believes this is an acceptable proposal.RECOMMENDATIONStaff recommends that the City Council approve an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­foot lakeshore setback, andan 11 percent lot coverage variance, subject to the conditions of approval, and adopts the attached Findings of Factand Decision:1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit.2. A title search for the property should be conducted to ensure any/all existing easements are documented.3. A new 1” = 20’ scale survey should be provided as part of the building permit application clearly showing thepropose setbacks and lot coverage for the proposed house and structures.4. At least one tree must be planted in front yard, if one is not present after construction.5. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits across the entire south side. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed.Any trees lost to construction activities beyond those indicated in the tree removal plan shall be replaced.6. No equipment may be stored within the tree protection area.7. Appropriate tree protection measures must be taken to protect the rear yard ash from EAB.8. The 162­square foot rear patio area is understood to be the property’s water­oriented structure.9. Lot coverage may not exceed 3,319 square feet.10. The proposed rear patio and driveway areas must be constructed using pervious paver systems.11 . A permanent 20­foot wide native vegetated buffer must be installed along the shoreline using species native tothe ecotype with permanent buffer monuments. The buffer may work around the path and stairs. The buffermust be designed and installed by an experienced professional in native shoreline restoration. Design plan mustbe approved by the Water Resources Coordinator.12. The property owner must work with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to identify and implement anyshoreline restoration projects that would improve ecosystem health and function. Replacing rip rap withbioengineering solutions is one example.Should the City Council deny the variance request, it is recommended that the City Council adopt thefollowing motion and attached Findings of Fact and Decision:“The Chanhassen City Council denies a variance request to allow an 11.5­foot front yard setback, a 22.1­ foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance, and adopts the attached Findings of Fact and Decision.” ATTACHMENTS: 1. PC Staff Report 2018­01 2. Findings of Fact PC signed 3. Findings of Fact and Decision Denial (CC) 4. Findings of Fact and Decision Approval (CC) 5. Appeal 6. Resident Concerns Email Bangasser 7. Resident Concerns Email Keusman 8. Email extending deadline for reivew 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (DENIAL) IN RE: Application of Todd and Kristin Jackson for an 11.5-foot front yard setback, a 22.1-foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance on a property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF) - Planning Case 2018-01. On January 2, 2018 the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and approved the variance. On February 12, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider an appeal of the Planning commission’s decision to recommend approval of the requested variances and now make the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 9, Block 4, Red Cedar Point Lake Minnewashta 4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The zoning code’s shoreland overlay district was enacted to protect the city’s aquatic resources. Allowing the applicant to exceed the districts 25 percent lot coverage limit and increase the extent of the nonconformity within the required 75-foot shoreland setback area increases the amount of runoff that will be directed to Lake Minnewashta and is contrary to the intent of the ordinance. 2 The City Code allows for owners to improve their properties in ways that reduce an existing nonconformity. Increasing the size and amount of structure located within the shoreland setback increases, rather than decreases the existing nonconformity. The proposed reduction to the property’s impervious surface does not meaningfully improve the property’s stormwater management. Increasing and maintaining nonconformities is not in line with the intent of the Chapter. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The lots substandard size combined with the required front and lake setbacks mean a reasonably sized home could not be constructed on the property without a variance; however, the requested variances significantly exceed the minimum variances needed for the construction of a reasonably sized home. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is located in an older subdivision and the existing structure does not conform to the current zoning code. The parcel is significantly smaller than the minimum size required for riparian lots zoned RSF. The substandard nature of the lot makes it impossible to construct a single-family home meeting the current zoning code. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The proposed home is larger than those located on the surrounding properties, and deviates for the general lake home aesthetic present in the community. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2018-01, dated January 2, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is incorporated herein. 3 DECISION “The Chanhassen City Council denies a variance request to allow an 11.5-foot front yard setback, a 22.1-foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance.” ADOPTED by the City Council this 12th day of February, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION (APPROVAL) IN RE: Application of Todd and Kristin Jackson for an 11.5-foot front yard setback, a 22.1-foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance on a property zoned Single Family Residential District (RSF) - Planning Case 2018-01 On January 2, 2018, the Chanhassen Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed variance preceded by published and mailed notice. The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and approved the variance. On February 12, 2018, the Chanhassen City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider an appeal of the Planning commission’s decision to recommend approval of the requested variances and now make the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential District (RSF). 2. The property is guided in the Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan for Residential Low Density. 3. The legal description of the property is: Lot 9, Block 4, Red Cedar Point Lake Minnewashta 4. Variance Findings – Section 20-58 of the City Code provides the following criteria for the granting of a variance: a. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Finding: The intent of the city’s shoreland management ordinance is to protect the city’s aquatic resources by requiring structures to be setback 75 feet from lakes and limiting the maximum lot coverage permitted within 1,000 feet of a lake to 25 percent. The setback and lot coverage limitation is designed to minimize the amount of stormwater runoff that is discharged into the lake. The applicant’s proposal calls for maintaining the existing nonconforming lake setback and slightly reducing the existing lot coverage. Staff believes that by using pervious pavers, installing a vegetative buffer, and working with 2 the watershed district to conduct a shoreline restoration project the proposed home’s impact on Lake Minnewashta will be minimized. Given the existing nonconforming nature of the property and the BMPs being required as conditions of approval for the variance, staff believes that the applicant’s proposal balances protecting the lake and allowing for reasonable use on a nonconforming property. The city’s zoning code requires a minimum front yard setback of 30 feet in order to provide for greenspace and a consistent neighborhood aesthetic. The applicant’s proposed reduction the front yard setback is in conjunction with the removal of an existing driveway that occupies most of the front yard and is similar to the front yard setback maintained by other homes in the neighborhood. For these reasons, the requested front yard setback in harmony with the chapter’s intent of providing for greenspace and a consistent neighborhood aesthetic. b. When there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this Chapter. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Finding: The lot’s substandard size combined with the required front and lake setbacks mean a reasonably sized home could not be constructed on the property without a variance. c. That the purpose of the variation is not based upon economic considerations alone. Finding: The variance request is not solely based upon economic considerations. d. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. Finding: The property is located in an older subdivision and the existing structure does not conform to the current zoning code. The parcel is significantly smaller than the minimum size required for riparian lots zoned RSF. The substandard nature of the lot makes it impossible to construct a single-family home meeting the current zoning code. e. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Finding: The property is located in one of the city’s oldest subdivisions. The vast majority of the properties within 500 feet of the parcel either have received variances or are nonconforming uses. The existing housing stock is a mix between older single level homes and more recent two-story homes. Due to the unique constraints posed by each lot and the changes in architectural trends over the decades, the housing in this area is a fairly eclectic mix. f. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 216C.06, subdivision 14, when in harmony with this Chapter. 3 Finding: This does not apply to this request. 5. The planning report #2018-01, dated January 2, 2018, prepared by MacKenzie Walters, is incorporated herein. DECISION “The Chanhassen City Council approves an 11.5-foot front yard setback, a 22.1-foot lakeshore setback, and an 11 percent lot coverage variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must apply for and receive a building permit. 2. A title search for the property should be conducted to ensure any/all existing easements are documented 3. A new 1inch = 20 feet scale survey should be provided as part of the building permit application clearly showing the propose setbacks and lot coverage for the proposed house and structures. 4. At least one tree must be planted in front yard, if one is not present after construction. 5. Tree protection fencing must be properly installed at the edge of the grading limits across the entire south side. This must be done prior to any construction activities and remain installed until all construction is completed. Any trees lost to construction activities beyond those indicated in the tree removal plan shall be replaced. 6. No equipment may be stored within the tree protection area. 7. Appropriate tree protection measures must be taken to protect the rear yard ash from EAB. 8. The 162 square foot rear patio area is understood to be the property’s water oriented structure. 9. Lot coverage may not exceed 3,319 square feet. 10. The proposed rear patio and driveway areas must be constructed using pervious paver systems. 11. A permanent 20-foot native vegetated buffer must be installed along the shoreline using species native to the ecotype with permanent buffer monuments. The buffer may work around the path and stairs. The buffer must be designed and installed by an experienced professional in native shoreline restoration. Design plan must be approved by the Water Resources Coordinator. 12. The property owner must work with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to identify and implement any shoreline restoration projects that would improve ecosystem health and function. Replace riprap with bioengineering solutions is one example. ADOPTED by the City Council this 12th day of February, 2018. CITY OF CHANHASSEN BY: Denny Laufenburger, Mayor CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject 531 West 79th Street: Approval of Site Plan to construct Panera Bread Section NEW BUSINESS Item No: H.3. Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: PC 2018­02 PROPOSED MOTION “City Council approves the site plan for a 4,500 square­foot, one­story restaurant with drive­through facilities, plans prepared by CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. dated revised November 30, 2017, subject to the conditions of the staff report, as amended, and adopts the Planning Commission’s Findings of Fact.” Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present. SUMMARY The applicant is requesting site plan approval to construct a 4,500 square­foot, one­story restaurant with drive­ through facilities using Exterior Insulating Finishing System (EIFS) as a primary building material. BACKGROUND Planning Commission Summary The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2, 2018 to review the proposed site plan. The Planning Commission voted 5 ­ 0 to recommend approval of the site plan subject to the conditions of the staff report. The Planning Commission agreed with staff that additional architectural articulation should be made to the building and that these changes be prepared prior to City Council review. Planning Commission minutes for January 2, 2018 are included in the consent agenda for the January 22, 2018 City Council packet. DISCUSSION Staff has been working extensively with the applicant to develop building architectural detailing that meets the city’s expectations. The applicant has responded with the attached building elevations dated January 15, 2018, which comply with city ordinances.  The building consists of two tones of EIFS, white and gray, with graystone brick finish at the entrance, the drive­ through, and as a base material around the entire building. The applicant has also incorporated additional windows on the north, west, and south elevations. In areas where transparent windows were not appropriate, spandrel windows are being installed. The canopies above the entrance and the drive­through will be painted a contrasting color from the CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORTMonday, February 12, 2018Subject531 West 79th Street: Approval of Site Plan to construct Panera BreadSectionNEW BUSINESS Item No: H.3.Prepared By Bob Generous, Senior Planner File No: PC 2018­02PROPOSED MOTION“City Council approves the site plan for a 4,500 square­foot, one­story restaurant with drive­through facilities, plansprepared by CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. dated revised November 30, 2017, subject to the conditions of thestaff report, as amended, and adopts the Planning Commission’s Findings of Fact.”Council approval requires a Simple Majority Vote of members present.SUMMARYThe applicant is requesting site plan approval to construct a 4,500 square­foot, one­story restaurant with drive­through facilities using Exterior Insulating Finishing System (EIFS) as a primary building material.BACKGROUNDPlanning Commission SummaryThe Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2, 2018 to review the proposed site plan. The PlanningCommission voted 5 ­ 0 to recommend approval of the site plan subject to the conditions of the staff report. ThePlanning Commission agreed with staff that additional architectural articulation should be made to the building and thatthese changes be prepared prior to City Council review.Planning Commission minutes for January 2, 2018 are included in the consent agenda for the January 22, 2018 CityCouncil packet.DISCUSSIONStaff has been working extensively with the applicant to develop building architectural detailing that meets the city’sexpectations. The applicant has responded with the attached building elevations dated January 15, 2018, whichcomply with city ordinances. The building consists of two tones of EIFS, white and gray, with graystone brick finish at the entrance, the drive­through, and as a base material around the entire building. The applicant has also incorporated additional windows on the north, west, and south elevations. In areas where transparent windows were not appropriate, spandrel windows are being installed. The canopies above the entrance and the drive­through will be painted a contrasting color from the windows and doors. They are currently leaning toward the use of Berber White. The applicant has provided support material regarding the EIFS finish that assures staff that the material is of the highest quality and will be reinforced to a minimum of six feet above grade with a mesh that will help protect the material from penetrations. Staff has queried the building official regarding the use of EIFS and was assured that it provides an exterior finish comparable to stucco. Given the specifications of the system being proposed, staff supports its use in the building elevations as shown. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the site plan for Panera Bread subject to the amended conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Building Elevations Dated 1­15­17 2. Email String Dated 1­15­18 between Matthew Hinchcliffe and Bob Generous 3. Dryvit Outsystems vs. Stucco 4. Amended Conditions of Approval 5. PC Staff Report 18­02 6. Findings of Fact 7. Application for Development Review 8. Traffic Study Report 9. Plans 10. MnDOT Letter 11. Affidavit of Mailing BRIAN B.DAN C. KEVIN C. Bakery-Cafe: Project Title: Professional Seal: Project Team: Consultant Copyright Placeholder Project Number: Drawn By: Issue Date: Sheet Number: DPM:DM:CPM:PB 2015.01Bakery Cafe1/15/2018 4:56:23 PMA300 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE VIEWS 09.27.17 ARCV, MH 531 W. 79th StreetChanhassen, MN 55317#6038#6038 170317PERMIT / BID PACKAGE05 NorthEast Corner View 04 SouthEast Corner View No.Description Date 1 Owner Comments 11/2/17 01 View from Access Road (East) 02 View from W. 79th (Easterly-01) 03 View from W. 79th (Easterly-02) 06 View from W. 79th (Westerly) 09 View from Highway (SouthWest-02) 08 View from Highway (Southwest-01) 07 View from Highway (South) FIRST FLOOR 0" FIRST FLOOR 0" T.O. PARAPET 20' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 20' - 0" 1 2 3 6 845 BX1 BX1 3.03 3.03 3.03 PX1 BX1 3.21 3.04 3.08 G1 3.083.05 3.08 G1 3.08 3.03 17' - 0" F2F2 3.14 3.10 3.33 3.01 3.123.12F2 3.12 0.30 0.31 F2 7 3.03 PX2 PX2 PX2 FIRST FLOOR 0" FIRST FLOOR 0" T.O. PARAPET 20' - 0" ABCDEFG BX1 BX1 3.12 3.13 F2 PX1 3.03 F2 3.10 BX1 G1 3.08 3.19 3.26 3.12 F2 0.30 0.31 3.15 B.5D.5 F2 3.03 PX2 PX1 PX2PX2 PX2BEYOND 3.01 BX1 BRIAN B. DAN C. KEVIN C. Bakery-Cafe: Project Title: Professional Seal: Project Team: Consultant Copyright Placeholder Project Number: Drawn By: Issue Date: Sheet Number: DPM:DM:CPM:PB 2015.01Bakery Cafe1/15/2018 4:56:25 PMA301 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 09.27.17 CAO, MH 531 W. 79th StreetChanhassen, MN 55317#6038#6038 170317PERMIT / BID PACKAGEKEYED NOTES 0.30 PATIO RAILING BY PANERA, COLOR: CHARCOAL REFER TO 23/A014, BY TENANT 0.31 PATIO SIDEWALK LIGHTS BY PANERA. REFER TO TENANT REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.01 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED LED CHANNEL LETTERS. SIGN PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN VENDOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT; G.C. TO PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALL FOR SIGN AND PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL ON BACKSIDE OF PARAPET FOR ACCESS AS REQUIRED. (UNDER SEPARATE SIGNAGE PERMIT) 3.03 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. FIXTURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY GC. GC TO PROVIDE POWER AS REQUIRED. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.04 MAIN ENTRANCE/EXIT | REFER TO A601 AND A611 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.05 SECONDARY ENTRANCE/EXIT | REFER TO A601 AND A611 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.08 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLAZING. COLR: DARK BRONZE REFER TO SHEET A611 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.10 CONTROL JOINT(S) WHERE INDICATED | PROVIDE SEALANT TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL MATERIAL. 3.12 PRE-MANUFACTURED FABRIC AWNING PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN VENDOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. GC SHALL PROVIDE APPROPRIATE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED BY SIGN VENDOR. REFER TO SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.13 SECURITY CAMERA INSTALLED BY TENANT | COORDINATE ROUGH-IN LOCATION(S) AND HEIGHTS WITH PANERA CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. G.C TO RUN CONDUIT & J-BOX. 3.14 4" DIA. CONCRETE BOLLARD | FINISH: PAINT CHARCOAL | REFER TO SHEET A014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 3.15 6" DIA. CONCRETE BOLLARD | FINISH: PAINT P107 | REFER TO SHEET A014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 3.19 HOSE BIBB | RECESSED STAINLESS STEEL BOX. REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. INSTALLED BY TENANT. 3.21 BUILDING ADDRESS SIGN | VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION, AND STYLE WITH LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT 3.26 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, 12" SPACING. | COLOR: DARK BRONZE 3.33 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED LED 'DRIVE THRU' SIGN BY TENANT. COLOR: BLACK CHANNEL WITH REVERSE (HALO) ILLUMINATION AND WHITE LETTERS. ALL SIGNAGE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIKT. G.C. SHALL PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALL FOR SIGN AND PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL ON BACKSIDE OF PARAPET FOR ACCESS AS REQUIED. BX1 BRICK MASONRY SYSTEM, MODULAR SIZE | MFR: ENDURAMAX/PALMETTO, CLAY BRICK | COLOR: 2.0 GREYSTONE WIRECUT F2 FABRIC AWNING | OPEN ENDED SLAB | COLOR: SUNBRELLA - ASPEN, (4' PROJECTION / 4' HEIGHT AT TYPICAL) G1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT | 2" x 4 1/2" PROFILE | THERMAL BREAK | COLOR: DARK BRONZE | 1" CLEAR INSULATED GLAZING: PPG SOLARBAN 70XL (OR APPROVED EQUAL) | REFER TO SHEET A611 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PX1 EIFS SYSTEM | TEXTURE: TO MATCH DRYVIT LIMESTONE FINISH | COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE #955 BERBER WHITE PX2 EIFS SYSTEM | TEXTURE: TO MATCH DRYVIT LIMESTONE FINISH | COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE #1469 EAGLE ROCK 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH ELEVATION No.Description Date 1 Owner Comments 11/2/17 GENERAL NOTES: A. ALL GLAZING TO BE G1 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. FOR STOREFRONT / WINDOW ELEVATIONS SEE SHEET A611. FIRST FLOOR 0" FIRST FLOOR 0" T.O. PARAPET 20' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 20' - 0" A B C D E F G CMU1 BX1 3.13 3.12 3.07 BX1 3.03 BX1 3.03 PX1 F2 3.143.153.20 3.10 3.10 3.17 3.13 3.19 8' - 0"15' - 4"3.26 3.08 G1 3.12 F2 PX2 3.10 3.12 F2 2' - 8"3.15 B.5 D.5 3.03 3.03 3.03 3.01 PX1 3.03 5' - 7" 3.03 G3 PX2PX2 BX1 3.103.10 3.03 G3 3.12 F2 3.12 F2 FIRST FLOOR 0" FIRST FLOOR 0" T.O. PARAPET 20' - 0" T.O. PARAPET 20' - 0" 1236845 BX1 F2 3.10 3.29 BX1 3.26 3.16 3.10 BX1 3.19 3.12 3.03 3.02 3.133.13 3.06 3.12 F2 3.03 PX1 15' - 4"3.15 3.10 PX1 3.183.18 8' - 0" 3.10 0.31 0.30 3.10 3.10 7 3.10 3.10 PX2 F2 F2 F2 G3G3G3 BRIAN B. DAN C. KEVIN C. Bakery-Cafe: Project Title: Professional Seal: Project Team: Consultant Copyright Placeholder Project Number: Drawn By: Issue Date: Sheet Number: DPM:DM:CPM:PB 2015.01Bakery Cafe1/15/2018 4:56:31 PMA302 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 09.27.17 CAO, MH 531 W. 79th StreetChanhassen, MN 55317#6038#6038 170317PERMIT / BID PACKAGEKEYED NOTES 0.30 PATIO RAILING BY PANERA, COLOR: CHARCOAL REFER TO 23/A014, BY TENANT 0.31 PATIO SIDEWALK LIGHTS BY PANERA. REFER TO TENANT REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.01 INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED LED CHANNEL LETTERS. SIGN PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN VENDOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT; G.C. TO PROVIDE BLOCKING IN WALL FOR SIGN AND PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL ON BACKSIDE OF PARAPET FOR ACCESS AS REQUIRED. (UNDER SEPARATE SIGNAGE PERMIT) 3.02 PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING | FINISH: DARK BRONZE 3.03 WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. FIXTURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY GC. GC TO PROVIDE POWER AS REQUIRED. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.06 HOLLOW METAL SERVICE DOOR. REFER TO A601 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL COLOR. 3.07 DRIVE-THRU WINDOW | MFR: QUIKSERV | MODEL: FM42E | COLOR TO MATCH STOREFRONT. INSTALLED BY LL. 3.08 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLAZING. COLR: DARK BRONZE REFER TO SHEET A611 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 3.10 CONTROL JOINT(S) WHERE INDICATED | PROVIDE SEALANT TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL MATERIAL. 3.12 PRE-MANUFACTURED FABRIC AWNING PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY SIGN VENDOR UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. GC SHALL PROVIDE APPROPRIATE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED BY SIGN VENDOR. REFER TO SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 3.13 SECURITY CAMERA INSTALLED BY TENANT | COORDINATE ROUGH-IN LOCATION(S) AND HEIGHTS WITH PANERA CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. G.C TO RUN CONDUIT & J-BOX. 3.14 4" DIA. CONCRETE BOLLARD | FINISH: PAINT CHARCOAL | REFER TO SHEET A014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 3.15 6" DIA. CONCRETE BOLLARD | FINISH: PAINT P107 | REFER TO SHEET A014 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 3.16 FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS BOX | INSTALLED ADJACENT SERVICE DOOR. COORDINATE LOCATION WITH LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT. 3.17 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) 3.18 NICKEL BRONZE NOZZLE RWL/OVERFLOW DRAIN THRU ROOF, MIN. 12" ABOVE GRADE. SEE DETAIL 24/A103. INSTALLED BY LL. 3.19 HOSE BIBB | RECESSED STAINLESS STEEL BOX. REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. INSTALLED BY TENANT. 3.20 GATE ENCLOSURE AT CART CORRAL | MFR: TREX COMPOSITE PLANK | COLOR: SADDLE | INSTALLED BY LL. 3.26 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING, 12" SPACING. | COLOR: DARK BRONZE 3.29 GAS METER - REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION BX1 BRICK MASONRY SYSTEM, MODULAR SIZE | MFR: ENDURAMAX/PALMETTO, CLAY BRICK | COLOR: 2.0 GREYSTONE WIRECUT CMU1 SMOOTH FACE CONCRETE BLOCK, PAINT TO MATCH MAIN BUILDING F2 FABRIC AWNING | OPEN ENDED SLAB | COLOR: SUNBRELLA - ASPEN, (4' PROJECTION / 4' HEIGHT AT TYPICAL) G1 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT | 2" x 4 1/2" PROFILE | THERMAL BREAK | COLOR: DARK BRONZE | 1" CLEAR INSULATED GLAZING: PPG SOLARBAN 70XL (OR APPROVED EQUAL) | REFER TO SHEET A611 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION G3 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT | 2" x 4 1/2" PROFILE | THERMAL BREAK | COLOR: DARK BRONZE | 1" INSULATED SPANDREL GLAZING, HEAT STRENGTHENED | REFER TO SHEET A611 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PX1 EIFS SYSTEM | TEXTURE: TO MATCH DRYVIT LIMESTONE FINISH | COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE #955 BERBER WHITE PX2 EIFS SYSTEM | TEXTURE: TO MATCH DRYVIT LIMESTONE FINISH | COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE #1469 EAGLE ROCK 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 WEST ELEVATION No.Description Date 1 Owner Comments 11/2/17 17' - 0" 22' - 0" 20' - 0"21' - 0" 8' - 4 1/2" 20' - 0" 22' - 0" 20' - 0" BRIAN B. DAN C. KEVIN C. Bakery-Cafe: Project Title: Professional Seal: Project Team: Consultant Copyright Placeholder Project Number: Drawn By: Issue Date: Sheet Number: DPM:DM:CPM:PB 2015.01Bakery Cafe1/15/2018 4:56:54 PMA304 ELEVATIONS - REALISTIC 09.27.17 Author 531 W. 79th StreetChanhassen, MN 55317#6038#6038 170317PERMIT / BID PACKAGENo.Description Date 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 EAST ELEVATION_Realistic 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 NORTH ELEVATION_Realistic 8' - 0"2' - 8"22' - 0" 20' - 0" 8' - 0" 1' - 2 1/8" 22' - 0" 20' - 0"20' - 0" BRIAN B. DAN C. KEVIN C. Bakery-Cafe: Project Title: Professional Seal: Project Team: Consultant Copyright Placeholder Project Number: Drawn By: Issue Date: Sheet Number: DPM:DM:CPM:PB 2015.01Bakery Cafe1/15/2018 4:57:29 PMA305 ELEVATIONS - REALISTIC, CONT. 09.27.17 Author 531 W. 79th StreetChanhassen, MN 55317#6038#6038 170317PERMIT / BID PACKAGENo.Description Date 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH ELEVATION_Realistic 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 WEST ELEVATION_Realistic Mon 1/15/2018 5:01 PM RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eacjg9djr2r3yw4/AADCDIKUt_nOdRvoyFVQRUfBa?dl=0 Bob – Please see dropbox link above for revised elevation package including the below items. M. Hinchcliffe ArcVision, Inc. d. 314.415.2325 m. 314.873.5787 Matthew Hinchcliffe Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 5:02 PM To: 'Generous, Bob' <bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Good afternoon Bob, (Sorry for the ghost email, mouse got away from me). • Panera will agree to use spandrel windows @ our dark colored ‘Faux’ windows. • Panera will agree to paint the canopy(ies) as well as the patio railing system a contrasting color (we’re currently leaning on the Berber White #955 (same color as the light colored EIFS) to have them stand out a bit more. • Mechanical Equipment are screened from view. Yes you can see the tippy top of them from our straight on elevations. But they will be screened from view. Reference the multiple 3d images from roadways on sheet A300. Also per the city ordinance “they shall be located so as not to be visible from any public way”. • Noted on the signage. Panera are going to keep our current signage as is for the time being. • Reinforcing mesh shall be utilized to 6’ AFF as a minimum. If there is anything I missed or if you need anything addition, please let me know. I’ll be working on the elevations over the weekend per the above comments. M. Hinchcliffe ArcVision, Inc. d. 314.415.2325 m. 314.873.5787 From: Generous, Bob [mailto:bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 9:46 AM To: Matthew Hinchcliffe <mhinchcliffe@arcv.com> Subject: FW: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Matt, I talked to the Community Development Director and she said that if Panera Bread agrees to these conditions, then we could process it without having the revised building elevations for the City Council meeting on the 22nd. Bob From: Generous, Bob Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 4:06 PM To: 'Matthew Hinchcliffe' <mhinchcliffe@arcv.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Matt, I took your revised elevations to the City Manager and Community Development Director. They think the architecture has improved immensely, but you’re still not there. Following are revisions needed to get this to City Council. Use spandrel windows in all the applications that are not glass windows. We are already giving you a break by not requiring that fifty percent of the first floor facade that is viewed by the public be designed to include transparent windows and/or doors to minimize expanses of blank walls. (Section 20-1068) The entrance still needs additional attention. Incorporate a contrasting material color for the entrance canopy. Could you use the same color as the canopy (Sunbrella-Aspen- Is that the Panera green?)? The railing/fencing system for the patio should also be a contrasting color? Mechanical equipment and other utility hardware, whether located on the roof or exterior of the building or on the ground adjacent to it, shall be screened from the public view and with materials identical to or strongly similar to building materials or by heavy landscaping that will be effective in winter or they shall be located so as not to be visible from any public way. Use of parapet walls or pitched roof elements to screen equipment is encouraged. In no case shall wooden fencing be used as a rooftop equipment screen. Show that the equipment is screened. In the elevations, they appear to stick up above the parapet in the “realistic elevations”. Note that the “Drive thru” sign is not permitted on the building. Additionally, signage is only permitted on two building elevations. A separate sign variance application would be necessary to review this. If you take them off, I won’t have to comment on them. We can support the use of the EIFS system, but we will require that it be the Outsulation system with hydroponic coating to installed with proprietary reinforcing meshes up to six feet above grade. I’ll need to know if these changes will be made. Let me know by tomorrow so I can keep it on the 1/22 City Council agenda. I need revised elevations by next Tues 1/16 to add to the packet. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Bob Robert Generous, AICP Senior Planner CITY OF CHANHASSEN PH. 952.227.1131 FX. 952.227.1110 www.ci.chanhassen.mn.us From: Matthew Hinchcliffe [mailto:mhinchcliffe@arcv.com] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 1:56 PM To: Generous, Bob <bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera https://www.dropbox.com/sh/eacjg9djr2r3yw4/AADCDIKUt_nOdRvoyFVQRUfBa?dl=0 Bob, please see link above. I’ve also include a digital material board for your viewing pleasures. Please let me know if you have any questions/comments/concerns. Thanks again Bob for all your help! M. Hinchcliffe ArcVision, Inc. d. 314.415.2325 m. 314.873.5787 From: Generous, Bob [mailto:bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:36 AM To: Matthew Hinchcliffe <mhinchcliffe@arcv.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Hi Matt. Are the elevations ready? Bob From: Matthew Hinchcliffe [mailto:mhinchcliffe@arcv.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 9:38 AM To: Generous, Bob <bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: 'Dan Cook (dan.cook@panerabread.com)' <dan.cook@panerabread.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera I should have the elevations back to you EOD today. M. Hinchcliffe ArcVision, Inc. d. 314.415.2325 m. 314.873.5787 From: Generous, Bob [mailto:bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 9:36 AM To: Matthew Hinchcliffe <mhinchcliffe@arcv.com> Cc: 'Dan Cook (dan.cook@panerabread.com)' <dan.cook@panerabread.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Matt, How are you coming with the revised building elevations? I need to complete the report Thursday and would like to have the elevations to show to the Community Development Director and City Manager before completing the report. Bob From: Matthew Hinchcliffe [mailto:mhinchcliffe@arcv.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 5:56 PM To: Generous, Bob <bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: 'Dan Cook (dan.cook@panerabread.com)' <dan.cook@panerabread.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Absolutely. Our decision to use an EIFS system for the exterior is essentially the outcome of the climate the project is located within. Given current Energy Code standards, there is a need/requirement for continuous insulation around the perimeter of the building. A stucco application with this particular energy code requirement would hinder the construction of the exterior wall assembly in a way that the exterior walls would need multiple layers of plywood/sheathing to essentially ‘sandwich’ rigid insulation. An addition cost that is removed with an EIFS system. For example, stucco cannot be applied directly on rigid insulation. So the wall construction would be constructed as such: • Working to the exterior from Stud o Metal Stud o Sheathing o Vapor/Moisture Barrier o Rigid Insulation (±2inches) o Sheathing o Tar Paper o Lathe o Stucco With an EIFS system, the wall construction uses considerably less materials. • Working to the Exterior from Stud o Metal Stud o Sheathing o Vapor/Moisture Barrier o EIFS system (±2inch thickness) The overall outcome of an EIFS finish system has been dramatically better than with a stucco application. I feel Stucco has its uses in certain climates (Southern States) but for a frigid and harsh winter climate with dramatic temperature shifts throughout the year, the proposed EIFS system will have a dramatic effect to the overall energy performance of the project. That’s not including the overall performance of the specification I added previously. There was a concern of EIFS impact resistance. As indicated in the specification, we do have the ability to install proprietary reinforcing meshes. https://youtu.be/38GwJLZpu6c not the same manufacturer, but Dryvit/BASF are equal products and there is another video using Sto’s system which I can share as well. As for additional EIFS features we have included the step back custom cornice on the EIFS part and the stepped out brick on the brick. No Quoins. Recesses at the faux windows. Vertical reveals between the windows on the EIFS. M. Hinchcliffe ArcVision, Inc. d. 314.415.2325 m. 314.873.5787 From: Generous, Bob [mailto:bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 8:35 AM To: Matthew Hinchcliffe <mhinchcliffe@arcv.com> Cc: 'Dan Cook (dan.cook@panerabread.com)' <dan.cook@panerabread.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Matt, Could you provide a write-up about what and why you are proposing the use of this system. Also, do you intend to provide dramatic architectural details and design effects, such as reveals, quoins, cornices and trim? Bob From: Matthew Hinchcliffe [mailto:mhinchcliffe@arcv.com] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 11:52 AM To: Generous, Bob <bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Cc: 'Dan Cook (dan.cook@panerabread.com)' <dan.cook@panerabread.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Good morning Bob, I do, I have a lot of literature on the EIFS specification. And a few video’s as well. As Dan has mentioned, this product is top tier quality. And has been used on many Panera’s throughout the US and has held up very well. Video of its Hydrophobic Properties (meaning it will stay clean/dryer): https://youtu.be/laUmzbquDK4 Video of the ‘Lymestone’ texture installation which is a 2-3 step process: https://youtu.be/vmtbrwdaug4 The actual EIFS system is the “Outsulation Plus MD system” which I have attached a brochure. And I have included a comparison ‘cladding’ chart. Pay specific attention to the Outsulation system vs Conventional Stucco. Please let me know if you require any additional information. Hopefully I don’t overload you with information. Last note: In the PDF document labeled as ‘all-in-one” 3rd page, there is a ‘high impact’ detail. This would typically be installed on the bottom 4-5ft of the wall as well as at any corners/opening perimeters/etc. Thanks for your time! M. Hinchcliffe ArcVision, Inc. d. 314.415.2325 m. 314.873.5787 From: Generous, Bob [mailto:bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 10:30 AM To: Matthew Hinchcliffe <mhinchcliffe@arcv.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Matt, Do you have any literature, specifications or brochures for the EIFS system they are proposing to use? According to Dan, it is a beefed up version. Bob From: Matthew Hinchcliffe [mailto:mhinchcliffe@arcv.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 9:22 AM To: Generous, Bob <bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera https://www.dropbox.com/sh/tmm8kdumvfmle99/AADWZvVQGjedDzyRonCDGfqha?dl=0 Absolutely. I’ve included a link above to both the ‘original’ submittal, as well as the elevation package of where we’re at today. M. Hinchcliffe ArcVision, Inc. d. 314.415.2325 m. 314.873.5787 From: Generous, Bob [mailto:bgenerous@ci.chanhassen.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 4:30 PM To: Matthew Hinchcliffe <mhinchcliffe@arcv.com> Subject: RE: Building Elevation Ideas | Chanhassen, MN | Panera Matt, Could you email me the latest building elevations so I can incorporate them in my presentation. Thanks, Bob Panera Bread Amended Conditions of Approval January 22, 2018 Staff recommends that City Council approve the site plan for a 4,500 square foot, one-story restaurant with drive through facilities plans prepared by CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. dated revised 11/30/17, subject to the following conditions: Building: 1. The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 2. Building plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota. 3. Sanitary and storm sewer service must comply with Minnesota State Plumbing Code (see Table 701.1). 4. Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete building plans are submitted. 5. The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures. Engineering: 1. The plans shall be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota prior to recording the site plan agreement. 2. Provide perimeter drainage and utility easements were none exist concurrent with recording the site plan agreement. 3. The applicant must move any feature out from within the City’s drainage and utility easement, including both bioretention basins or the applicant must enter into an encroachment agreement with the City after, but concurrent to the site plan agreement. 4. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the two bioretention basins concurrent with recording the site plan agreement. 5. Soil boring locations shall be shown on the grading plan prior to site grading. 6. Indicate finished floor elevation of the adjacent parcel to the east prior to site grading. 7. Provide existing and proposed elevations at each lot corner, top of curb or centerline of the roadway at each lot line extension, center of the proposed driveway at the curbline, and indicate the proposed driveway grade prior to site grading. 8. Indicate information to verify the lowest building opening is a minimum of 1-foot above the emergency overflow elevation of the bioretention basins prior to site grading. 9. Identify soil stockpile areas intended within the site limits prior to site grading. 10. Address review comments identified in the attached letter from MnDOT prior to site grading. 11. Provide Limited Use Permit (LUP) for the public sidewalk connection prior to recording the site plan agreement. 12. Applicant shall utilize the City’s standard detail for the sidewalk connection prior to site grading. 13. Staff has requested further traffic analysis to include the Market Blvd intersection prior to review for City Council consideration. 14. The applicant’s engineer shall also examine ways to mitigate the queueing and decreased LOS at the W 79th Street & Great Plain Blvd intersection prior to review for City Council consideration. 15. The applicant’s engineer shall verify whether an adequate sight line is provided for vehicles exiting the site access prior to review for City Council consideration. 16. Prior to review for City Council consideration, the traffic analysis report shall further discuss recommendations for the timing of improvements to the W 79th St & Great Plains Blvd intersection. The recommended ¾ intersection shall include a figure in the Appendix showing the proposed design. Further commentary shall be included related to its operation. 17. Plans shall show the current City detail plates and indicate all of the most up-to-date plates shall be used when the project under construction. 18. The storm sewer piping shall be included on the utility plan prior to recording the site plan agreement. 19. Plan shall include the bioretention basin details with elevations prior to site grading. 20. Recommend applicant review the design for the on-site hydrant. From a long term perspective, the hydrant should be fed by the water service to the parcel it serves. Coordinate with the adjacent property owner to abandon un-necessary water pipe. Otherwise, a maintenance agreement between the two parcels shall be filed to define future maintenance responsibilities and other important business protection aspects prior to site grading. 21. Utility plan indicates 0.87% for the sanitary sewer grade. Revise plan to increase grade to a minimum of 1% prior to site grading. 22. Sanitary sewer service shall be routed the nearest sanitary manhole to facilitate sewer cleaning due to the zoning classification and proposed property use. Prior to site grading, revise the plan to show the existing sanitary service connection to the main shall be abandoned. A short liner shall be used in the sanitary main and the pipe shall be filled with flowable fill or non-shrink grout to the property line. The line shall be capped at the property line. 23. Staff recommends C900 PVC water main pipe material be considered. 24. Recommend testing requirements for the utility piping be considered with the utility design. Install a new gate valve at the property line where the new water service piping ties into the existing service piping. 25. Provide details on the plans for the grease trap prior to site grading. 26. Demolition plan shall include removal of existing service piping to the connection locations prior to site grading. 27. The applicant shall coordinate with City staff prior to removal or construction of the services regarding inspection and traffic control on W 79th Street prior to site grading. 28. Once construction is complete, the applicant shall retain ownership of the proposed sanitary service, water service and hydrant constructed on this property. Recommend applicant consider flushing of the water service piping when selecting the location for the hydrant. 29. The applicant shall follow the accessibility code for the construction as well as all applicable State and Federal laws. 30. The applicant shall obtain permits from all applicable agencies which may include, but is not limited to the MPCA, MnDOT, Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District, ect. Environmental Resources: 1. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to accommodate more of the required bufferyard trees in the south buffer yard area. 2. The interior width of all landscape islands and peninsulas containing trees must be a minimum of 10 feet. The east island shall be enlarged to a minimum interior width of 10 feet. 3. Any existing trees scheduled to be preserved that are lost due to construction activities shall be replaced. 4. The Colorado spruce listed in the Plant Schedule shall be replaced with Black Hills spruce. 5. Existing ash trees that are preserved must be treated for EAB, as approved by the city. Failure to treat the trees, resulting in their death, will require replacement trees to be planted. Planning: 1. The applicant shall enter into a site plan agreement with the city and provide the necessary security to guarantee erosion control, site restoration and landscaping. 2. A copy of the cross access/parking agreement shall be submitted to the city. 3. Wall lighting and the trash enclosure lighting shall comply with city code. 4. The proposed monument sign shall be relocated on the site to comply with city code. 5. Signage shall comply with city code and requires separate sign permits for each sign. 6. Bike racks shall be incorporated on site near the access sidewalk from Highway 5. 7. The building elevations shall be revised to incorporate additional window openings in the bare expanses of the north, west and south walls. 8. The applicant is proposing two color bricks for the building material: tan and brown. The soldier course of brick above the doors and windows shall incorporate the darker colored brick to accent the windows. 9. Brick veneer may not be painted. EIFS may only be used as an accent material and may not cover more than 15 percent of the wall area provided that it is the Outsulation system with hydroponic coating, or equivalents, installed with proprietary reinforcing meshes a minimum of six feet above grade. 10. Additional rooftop treatments shall be provided above the building entrance. The entrance canopies and patio enclosure shall be painted a contrasting color to the bronze windows and doors. 11. Final architectural details shall be revised and approved prior to City Council review. Water Resources: 1. Six inches of topsoil is required and will be verified by city staff. In grading notes on page C3 it states 4 inches. 2. Topsoil needs to be specified. 3. Sequencing of Construction identifies no. 5 as to construct the temporary sedimentation and sediment trap, but nowhere in the grading plan is it identified. Plans should identify the bio-filtration basins be graded to be used as temporary sediment basin, along with temporary outlets to allow stormwater to be pumped and drained too, during construction of the site. 4. A design and planting plan approved by the Water Resources Coordinator is required for this high visibility location. Seed mix is insufficient for these vegetated basins. You must use species native to the ecoregion. 5. Sock should be eliminated from drain tile. Buckshot and or pea rock to surround underdrain pipe. 6. Underdrain tile needs to be identified. Should be a HDPE Corrugated perforated plastic tile. SCH 35, 40 PVC pipe is not allowed for underdrain. 7. Tile in bio-filtration basin needs to be placed on a minimum grade of 0.5 percent. 8. Plan details need to show a profile of the bio-retention basin with the grade of the tile placement. 9. All quantities of materials to be used, and specifications need to be identified on plan sheet for contractor to bid and to construct. 10. Mixed D soil may not be used. We only use 75 percent washed sand and 25 percent leafy compost. 11. Bio-filtration basin should be identified in sequencing that it should not be completed until all surrounding watershed to basins are stabilized. 12. City staff to be called, and be on site when contractor is installing bio-filtration basin to make sure the existing subsoil is scarified 18 inches below surface in bio-filtration basin 13. Contractor to have written statement as part of the pre-construction meeting, the means and method of how they plan to scarify and protect the subsurface from compaction in the bio-retention basin. 14. An approved operation and maintenance plan is required for all stormwater treatment devices. Including contact information for person(s) responsible for maintenance as well as person(s) performing onsite inspection and maintenance duties. The city must approve operation and maintenance plans prior to permits being issued. 15. The city will hold the security on the project until vegetation is well established and the planting is free of weeds. This may take a few growing seasons to achieve. 16. An additional drainage and utility easement shall be recorded over the drainage basins located west and south of the parking lot. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Letter from Metro Cities dated January 3, 2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.1. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Metro Cities dated January 3, 2018 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Review of Claims Paid 1­22­18 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.2. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No: N/A SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on January 22, 2018: Check Numbers Amounts 166432 – 166552 $562,209.49 ACH Payments                              $365,273.76 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Total All Claims $927,483.25 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 1/12/2018 10:07 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount POST POSTMASTER 12/29/2017 0.00 657.76166432 BaroWade WADE BARON 01/04/2018 0.00 3,500.00166433 bcatra BCA 01/04/2018 0.00 15.00166434 BerCof BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/04/2018 0.00 606.63166435 BlueSuza Suzanne Bluestein 01/04/2018 0.00 250.00166436 EPRPro EPR Properties 01/04/2018 0.00 41,100.00166437 FULLBLOO FULL BLOOM 01/04/2018 0.00 125.00166438 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/04/2018 0.00 1,445.91166439 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 01/04/2018 0.00 788.30166440 knobui KNOBLAUCH BUILDERS LLC 01/04/2018 0.00 250.00166441 metare METRO AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOC 01/04/2018 0.00 90.00166442 MetrFire Metro Fire Chief Officers Association 01/04/2018 0.00 100.00166443 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/04/2018 0.00 112.00166444 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/04/2018 0.00 446.65166445 apagro APACHE GROUP 01/04/2018 0.00 93.90166446 aspmil ASPEN MILLS 01/04/2018 0.00 1,754.05166447 blacon Blackstone Contractors, LLC 01/04/2018 0.00 179,925.98166448 borsta BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/04/2018 0.00 90.00166449 cenlin CenturyLink 01/04/2018 0.00 713.13166450 clewat CLEARSOFT WATER CONDITIONING 01/04/2018 0.00 119.95166451 crew2 Crew2 01/04/2018 0.00 32.96166452 HaegAlex Alex Haeg 01/04/2018 0.00 250.00166453 ISGro I & S Group, Inc 01/04/2018 0.00 2,100.00166454 jhlar JH LARSON COMPANY 01/04/2018 0.00 412.32166455 modspa Modular Space Corporation 01/04/2018 0.00 2,501.84166456 signso SIGNSOURCE 01/04/2018 0.00 192.50166457 sofhou SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 01/04/2018 0.00 2,225.00166458 StroVane Vanessa Strong 01/04/2018 0.00 149.80166459 413fit 413 FITNESS 01/11/2018 0.00 181.00166460 UB*01309 DEVON ANDERSON 01/11/2018 0.00 60.02166461 archjess Jessica Archer 01/11/2018 0.00 26.71166462 UB*01319 MATTHEW OR JESSICA ARNOLD 01/11/2018 0.00 26.28166463 ascap ASCAP 01/11/2018 0.00 348.00166464 bcatra BCA 01/11/2018 0.00 30.00166465 blucro BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 0.00 91,450.76166466 UB*01306 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 0.00 68.97166467 UB*01324 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 0.00 248.75166468 UB*01335 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 0.00 8.01166469 UB*01307 DONNA BURT 01/11/2018 0.00 16.87166470 UB*01329 CAMBRIA TITLE TRUST ACCOUNT 01/11/2018 0.00 72.24166471 UB*01303 CCA&T 01/11/2018 0.00 10.33166472 UB*01336 DERRICK CHRAST 01/11/2018 0.00 39.76166473 CorrMatt Matt Corr 01/11/2018 0.00 250.00166474 UB*01325 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 6.48166475 UB*01332 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 37.05166476 UB*01316 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 17.60166477 UB*01331 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 0.00 86.17166478 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/12/2018 10:07 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount UB*01327 SANDY JERDEE 01/11/2018 0.00 47.34166479 JimCam Jim Cam LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 50.00166480 k2ele K2 Electrical Services Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 1,277.50166481 UB*01315 BRENT & BRIANA KOTTKE 01/11/2018 0.00 24.17166482 UB*01326 LAND TITLE 01/11/2018 0.00 14.18166483 UB*01308 NING LI 01/11/2018 0.00 26.11166484 UB*01317 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/11/2018 0.00 60.92166485 UB*01328 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/11/2018 0.00 23.00166486 LinStarT Linn Star Transfer Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 30.00166487 favrKati Katie Mathews 01/11/2018 0.00 300.00166488 UB*01311 BRIAN & ELIZABETH MCKAY 01/11/2018 0.00 37.34166489 metcit Metro Cities 01/11/2018 0.00 8,278.00166490 metco2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 01/11/2018 0.00 152,094.89166491 UB*01322 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/11/2018 0.00 88.43166492 UB*01323 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL 01/11/2018 0.00 207.98166493 UB*01305 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL TITLE SERVICES01/11/2018 0.00 51.56166494 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 01/11/2018 0.00 400.00166495 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 01/11/2018 0.00 55.00166496 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 01/11/2018 0.00 23.00166497 UB*01313 PARTNERS TITLE 01/11/2018 0.00 21.09166498 UB*01334 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 0.00 196.10166499 recinc R.E.C. Inc.01/11/2018 0.00 2,500.00166500 UB*01304 DOUG & TERRI SCHEURICH 01/11/2018 0.00 104.63166501 UB*01321 SIENA TITLE 01/11/2018 0.00 70.63166502 StaMin STATE OF MINNESOTA 01/11/2018 0.00 76.00166503 UB*01320 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 0.00 19.44166504 UB*01333 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 0.00 40.59166505 susa Suburban Utilities Superintendent Assoc 01/11/2018 0.00 375.00166506 UB*01330 SUSAN & KENNETH 01/11/2018 0.00 51.66166507 UB*01318 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 0.00 39.70166508 UB*01337 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 0.00 156.35166509 UB*01312 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 47.04166510 UB*01314 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 97.22166511 UB*01310 WEST TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 233.06166512 ArchJess Jessica Archer 01/11/2018 0.00 67.41166513 benpro BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 01/11/2018 0.00 930.00166514 brogar Brookside Garden Center, Inc.01/11/2018 0.00 242.00166515 bryroc BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 01/11/2018 0.00 514.69166516 CEMPRO CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 01/11/2018 0.00 261.00166517 cenene CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 0.00 6,232.42166518 EmbMinn CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 0.00 1,131.09166519 chapet CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 01/11/2018 0.00 4.80166520 CLACCO CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 01/11/2018 0.00 136.34166521 cormai CORE & MAIN LP 01/11/2018 0.00 1,164.98166522 deltoo DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/11/2018 0.00 11.04166523 dulsal Dultmeier Sales LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 283.65166524 ekhopaul PAUL EKHOLM 01/11/2018 0.00 47.08166525 empgro EMPLOYEE GROUP FUND 01/11/2018 0.00 206.00166526 ferent Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/11/2018 0.00 7.34166527 GuytGaye Gaye Guyton 01/11/2018 0.00 11,109.76166528 hach Hach Company 01/11/2018 0.00 127.14166529 isccom ISC Companies Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 15.64166530 jertra JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER.01/11/2018 0.00 236.87166531 metco2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 01/11/2018 0.00 2,675.00166532 minair MINNESOTA AIR 01/11/2018 0.00 111.21166533 morsal MORTON SALT 01/11/2018 0.00 3,863.08166534 natsur Natural Surroundings Inc.01/11/2018 0.00 1,792.60166535 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/12/2018 10:07 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount nobwin NOBLE WINDOWS INC 01/11/2018 0.00 667.75166536 olscom OLSEN COMPANIES 01/11/2018 0.00 275.00166537 potmn Potentia MN Solar 01/11/2018 0.00 4,805.87166538 premrm PRECISE MRM LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 369.14166539 pulplu PULLTABS PLUS INC 01/11/2018 0.00 150.33166540 RamCou RAMSEY COUNTY 01/11/2018 0.00 108.00166541 rilbus RILEY BUS SERVICE INC 01/11/2018 0.00 700.00166542 SandChri CHRIS SANDBERG 01/11/2018 0.00 125.96166543 shotru SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 01/11/2018 0.00 5.49166544 SiegChar CHARLES SIEGLE 01/11/2018 0.00 199.95166545 signso SIGNSOURCE 01/11/2018 0.00 334.00166546 sofhou SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 01/11/2018 0.00 1,428.00166547 sousub Southwest Suburban Publishing 01/11/2018 0.00 345.21166548 thegar The Garden By The Woods 01/11/2018 0.00 333.00166549 topall Top-All Roofing Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 2,300.00166550 towfen TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 01/11/2018 0.00 18,700.00166551 vikele VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/11/2018 0.00 39.04166552 Report Total (121 checks): 562,209.49 0.00 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (1/12/2018 10:07 AM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 1/12/2018 10:11 AM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH accela ACCELA, INC #774375 01/04/2018 0.00 41,268.26 ACH adapes ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 01/04/2018 0.00 125.00 ACH aflac American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 01/04/2018 0.00 39.78 ACH comint COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 01/04/2018 0.00 20,595.07 ACH gopsta GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 01/04/2018 0.00 117.45 ACH innoff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/04/2018 0.00 123.96 ACH kidplu Kidd Plumbing Inc 01/04/2018 0.00 244.00 ACH mvec MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 0.00 6,273.21 ACH Prares PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 01/04/2018 0.00 8,548.00 ACH ProSta PRO STAFF 01/04/2018 0.00 109.00 ACH protec Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 01/04/2018 0.00 1,437.09 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 01/04/2018 0.00 28.40 ACH verizo VERIZON WIRELESS 01/04/2018 0.00 40.01 ACH wenck WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 01/04/2018 0.00 3,792.50 ACH xcel XCEL ENERGY INC 01/04/2018 0.00 21,444.06 ACH a1ele A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 01/11/2018 0.00 2,291.35 ACH adveng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 1,688.00 ACH BATPLU BATTERIES PLUS 01/11/2018 0.00 108.68 ACH benext BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 01/11/2018 0.00 233.75 ACH benext BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 01/11/2018 0.00 60.00 ACH camknu CAMPBELL KNUTSON 01/11/2018 0.00 12,034.61 ACH CarGra CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 0.00 1,406.38 ACH carcou Carver County 01/11/2018 0.00 66,059.58 ACH carswc CARVER SWCD 01/11/2018 0.00 907.50 ACH damfar DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES 01/11/2018 0.00 70.00 ACH DiaSno Diamond Snow & Ice Control 01/11/2018 0.00 1,950.00 ACH engwat Engel Water Testing Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 350.00 ACH EnvSer EnviroTech Services Inc. 01/11/2018 0.00 510.00 ACH fascom FASTENAL COMPANY 01/11/2018 0.00 51.62 ACH FergEnte Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/11/2018 0.00 6,624.88 ACH hantho HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 01/11/2018 0.00 13,456.75 ACH hawche HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/11/2018 0.00 5,363.95 ACH hoikoe HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 01/11/2018 0.00 1,156.25 ACH imppor IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 01/11/2018 0.00 775.00 ACH indlan Indoor Landscapes Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 187.00 ACH innoff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 334.54 ACH innoff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/11/2018 0.00 219.98 ACH IRRBYD IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC 01/11/2018 0.00 500.00 ACH alhijuli Juli Al-Hilwani 01/11/2018 0.00 146.25 ACH katfue KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 01/11/2018 0.00 16,807.58 ACH kimhor KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 0.00 4,436.10 ACH ligpla Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc. 01/11/2018 0.00 886.80 ACH manoil Mansfield Oil Company 01/11/2018 0.00 14,140.22 ACH marco Marco Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 925.65 Page 1 of 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH merace MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 0.00 1,567.77 ACH metco Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 01/11/2018 0.00 29,521.80 ACH MinnVall Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories, Inc. 01/11/2018 0.00 160.00 ACH mnlabo MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 01/11/2018 0.00 2,461.05 ACH mrpa MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 01/11/2018 0.00 1,290.00 ACH munleg MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 01/11/2018 0.00 6,362.00 ACH napa NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/11/2018 0.00 141.82 ACH OPG-3 OPG-3, Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 5,735.00 ACH oreaut O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 453.12 ACH parkcon Park Construction Co 01/11/2018 0.00 5,434.70 ACH pomtir POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 01/11/2018 0.00 707.44 ACH pralaw PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 01/11/2018 0.00 34.73 ACH prewat Premium Waters, Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 10.30 ACH prewat Premium Waters, Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 10.30 ACH quaflo Quality Flow Systems Inc 01/11/2018 0.00 1,200.00 ACH HLBTAU REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 01/11/2018 0.00 7,300.00 ACH SOUSTP SOUTH ST PAUL STEEL SUPPLY CO 01/11/2018 0.00 1,058.17 ACH SPSSLP SPS Companies-St Louis Park 01/11/2018 0.00 455.62 ACH srfcon SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 01/11/2018 0.00 1,076.81 ACH UniFar United Farmers Cooperative 01/11/2018 0.00 187.71 ACH usablu USA BLUE BOOK 01/11/2018 0.00 760.01 ACH verizo VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 0.00 4,085.79 ACH Warlit Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 01/11/2018 0.00 359.60 ACH wsb WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 0.00 36,778.25 ACH wwgra WW GRAINGER INC 01/11/2018 0.00 253.56 Report Total: 0.00 365,273.76 Page 2 of 2 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 01/12/2018 - 10:17 AM Name Check Da Account Description Amount 413 FITNESS 01/11/2018 101-1533-4300 personal training-Quist 181.00 413 FITNESS 181.00 ANDERSON DEVON 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.73 ANDERSON DEVON 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 17.46 ANDERSON DEVON 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 29.41 ANDERSON DEVON 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.42 ANDERSON DEVON 60.02 APACHE GROUP 01/04/2018 101-1170-4150 Compostable liner 93.90 APACHE GROUP 93.90 Archer Jessica 01/11/2018 101-1250-4370 Mileage-seminars (Burnsville & Eagan) 67.41 Archer Jessica 01/11/2018 101-1250-4370 mileage-State of the State, Brooklyn Center 26.71 Archer Jessica 94.12 ARNOLD MATTHEW OR JESSICA 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 26.28 ARNOLD MATTHEW OR JESSICA 26.28 ASCAP 01/11/2018 101-1530-4300 2018 license fee 348.00 ASCAP 348.00 ASPEN MILLS 01/04/2018 101-1220-4240 pants/belt 80.95 ASPEN MILLS 01/04/2018 101-1220-4240 Class A uniform-Nutter 654.15 ASPEN MILLS 01/04/2018 101-1220-4240 Class A uniform-Smith 449.65 ASPEN MILLS 01/04/2018 101-1220-4240 Class A uniform-Johnson 502.45 ASPEN MILLS 01/04/2018 101-1220-4240 Badge-Nutter 66.85 ASPEN MILLS 1,754.05 BARON WADE 01/04/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow-7400 Minnewashta Pkwy 3,500.00 BARON WADE 3,500.00 BCA 01/11/2018 101-1120-4300 background investigations 30.00 BCA 01/04/2018 101-1120-4300 background investigation 15.00 BCA 45.00 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 101-0000-2012 February-Family 41,777.40 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 101-0000-2012 February-Family cobra 1,748.74 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 1 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 700-0000-2012 February-Family 6,645.21 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 701-0000-2012 February-Family 4,896.47 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 720-0000-2012 February-Family 2,640.60 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 101-0000-2012 February-Single 16,682.91 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 210-0000-2012 February-Single 874.64 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 700-0000-2012 February-Single 2,340.53 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 701-0000-2012 February-Single 1,640.82 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 720-0000-2012 February-Single 1,462.39 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 101-1220-4483 Jan & Feb Firefighter EAP 90.92 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 101-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Family 5,768.03 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 101-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Family cobra 222.79 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 700-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Family 846.60 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 701-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Family 623.81 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 720-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Family 336.42 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 101-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Single 2,035.07 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 210-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Single 111.43 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 700-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Single 303.51 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 701-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Single 214.38 BCBSM, Inc.01/11/2018 720-0000-2012 January Adjustment-Single 188.09 BCBSM, Inc. 91,450.76 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 01/11/2018 101-1550-4300 snowplowing 12/5 & 12/28 930.00 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC 930.00 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/04/2018 101-1170-4110 coffee/cocoa 62.80 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01/04/2018 101-1170-4110 coffee/cider 543.83 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 606.63 Blackstone Contractors, LLC 01/04/2018 400-4118-4751 City Hall campus improvements 145,624.31 Blackstone Contractors, LLC 01/04/2018 400-4118-4751 City Hall campus improvements 34,301.67 Blackstone Contractors, LLC 179,925.98 Bluestein Suzanne 01/04/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion Escrow-6501 Devonshire Drive 250.00 Bluestein Suzanne 250.00 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/04/2018 101-1190-4510 LED lamps 90.00 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 90.00 Brookside Garden Center, Inc.01/11/2018 101-1550-4150 pluverized dirt 242.00 Brookside Garden Center, Inc. 242.00 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 01/11/2018 101-1320-4150 1" with fines 514.69 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC 514.69 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 32.57 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 32.58 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.22 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.60 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 2 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 95.23 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 125.87 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 23.33 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.32 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.80 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.24 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.31 BURNET TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.66 BURNET TITLE 325.73 BURT DONNA 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.98 BURT DONNA 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.29 BURT DONNA 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.75 BURT DONNA 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.85 BURT DONNA 16.87 CAMBRIA TITLE TRUST ACCOUNT 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.61 CAMBRIA TITLE TRUST ACCOUNT 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 27.32 CAMBRIA TITLE TRUST ACCOUNT 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 34.62 CAMBRIA TITLE TRUST ACCOUNT 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.69 CAMBRIA TITLE TRUST ACCOUNT 72.24 CCA&T 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.40 CCA&T 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.88 CCA&T 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.92 CCA&T 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.13 CCA&T 10.33 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 01/11/2018 700-0000-4552 Hwy 5 & Audubon 261.00 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 261.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 101-1190-4320 gas charges 1,416.18 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 101-1550-4320 gas charges 380.18 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 701-0000-4320 gas charges 23.72 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 700-0000-4320 gas charges 266.22 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 101-1170-4320 gas charges 1,121.16 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 700-7019-4320 gas charges 487.67 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 700-0000-4320 gas charges 56.55 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 101-1600-4320 gas charges 84.81 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 101-1370-4320 gas charges 2,129.71 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/11/2018 701-0000-4320 gas charges 266.22 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 6,232.42 CenturyLink 01/04/2018 101-1540-4310 phone charges 95.40 CenturyLink 01/04/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges 15.13 CenturyLink 01/04/2018 700-7019-4310 phone charges 210.28 CenturyLink 01/04/2018 101-1160-4320 phone charges 250.00 CenturyLink 01/04/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges 15.12 CenturyLink 01/04/2018 101-1190-4310 phone charges 127.20 CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 101-1170-4310 phone charges 849.37 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 3 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 700-0000-4310 phone charges 6.36 CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 701-0000-4310 phone charges 6.36 CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 101-1550-4310 phone charges 30.04 CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 101-1350-4310 phone charges 30.04 CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 101-1220-4310 phone charges 33.04 CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 101-1370-4310 phone charges 50.88 CENTURYLINK 01/11/2018 101-1160-4320 phone charges 125.00 CENTURYLINK 1,844.22 CHRAST DERRICK 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.05 CHRAST DERRICK 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 28.71 CHRAST DERRICK 39.76 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 01/11/2018 700-7025-4530 permit surcharge 3.50 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 01/11/2018 101-1370-4510 permit surcharge 1.30 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 4.80 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 01/11/2018 101-1320-4240 gloves 136.34 CLASS C COMPONENTS INC 136.34 CLEARSOFT WATER CONDITIONING 01/04/2018 101-1370-4260 service call 119.95 CLEARSOFT WATER CONDITIONING 119.95 CORE & MAIN LP 01/11/2018 700-0000-4150 #18 3 Ply Remote Wire 230.00 CORE & MAIN LP 01/11/2018 700-0000-4550 #31 Wat Valve Seat w/O-Ring 458.54 CORE & MAIN LP 01/11/2018 700-0000-4550 #30 Hyd Bronze Crossarm W67 137.86 CORE & MAIN LP 01/11/2018 700-0000-4552 curb stops 338.58 CORE & MAIN LP 1,164.98 Corr Matt 01/11/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion escrow-8750 Sunset Trail 250.00 Corr Matt 250.00 Crew2 01/04/2018 101-1250-3301 refund permit fee-788 Lake Point 32.96 Crew2 32.96 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.48 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.23 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 22.01 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.44 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.37 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE LLC 43.53 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/11/2018 101-1370-4260 misc parts/supplies 11.04 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 11.04 Dultmeier Sales LLC 01/11/2018 101-1220-4120 misc parts/supplies 283.65 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 4 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Dultmeier Sales LLC 283.65 EKHOLM PAUL 01/11/2018 101-1250-4370 mileage-Eagan seminar 47.08 EKHOLM PAUL 47.08 EMPLOYEE GROUP FUND 01/11/2018 101-1110-4370 2017 soda use for meetings 206.00 EMPLOYEE GROUP FUND 206.00 EPR Properties 01/04/2018 815-8221-2024 Security Escrow-Children's Learning Adventure 41,100.00 EPR Properties 41,100.00 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.35 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES LLC 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.18 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES LLC 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.90 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.17 ESQUIRE TITLE SERVICES LLC 17.60 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/11/2018 700-0000-4240 winter line mech glove 6.48 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/11/2018 701-0000-4240 winter line mech glove 6.47 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/11/2018 700-0000-4150 return-PVC SW Shwr Drn -5.61 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 7.34 FULL BLOOM 01/04/2018 101-1560-4300 China program - 1/12/18 125.00 FULL BLOOM 125.00 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 29.28 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 51.42 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.62 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.85 GLOBAL CLOSING & TITLE SERVICES 86.17 Guyton Gaye 01/11/2018 601-6037-2233 Refund remaining balance from slope stabilization 11,109.76 Guyton Gaye 11,109.76 Hach Company 01/11/2018 700-0000-4550 Assy Pack, Chemkey, Dissolved iron 63.57 Hach Company 01/11/2018 700-0000-4150 Assy Pack, Chemkey, Dissolved iron 63.57 Hach Company 127.14 Haeg Alex 01/04/2018 720-7025-4751 WaterWise Drought-Tolerant Landscape Grant 250.00 Haeg Alex 250.00 I & S Group, Inc 01/04/2018 720-7025-4751 L2 Wetland Delineation 2,100.00 I & S Group, Inc 2,100.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/04/2018 101-0000-2009 01/05/2018 #304303 1,114.67 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 5 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/04/2018 210-0000-2009 01/05/2018 #304303 25.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/04/2018 700-0000-2009 01/05/2018 #304303 152.51 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/04/2018 701-0000-2009 01/05/2018 #304303 152.49 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/04/2018 720-0000-2009 01/05/2018 #304303 1.24 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 1,445.91 ISC Companies Inc 01/11/2018 101-1190-4510 V-Belt 15.64 ISC Companies Inc 15.64 IUOE Local #49 01/04/2018 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00405.01.2018 Local 49 dues 477.77 IUOE Local #49 01/04/2018 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00405.01.2018 Local 49 dues 209.33 IUOE Local #49 01/04/2018 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00405.01.2018 Local 49 dues 101.20 IUOE Local #49 788.30 JERDEE SANDY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.64 JERDEE SANDY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 17.76 JERDEE SANDY 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 25.47 JERDEE SANDY 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.47 JERDEE SANDY 47.34 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER.01/11/2018 101-1220-4120 ladder bracket 236.87 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER. 236.87 JH LARSON COMPANY 01/04/2018 101-1170-4510 13W single twin tube fluorescent lamp 186.00 JH LARSON COMPANY 01/04/2018 101-1190-4510 22W T5 pentron circline fluorescent 226.32 JH LARSON COMPANY 412.32 Jim Cam LLC 01/11/2018 815-8230-2024 Solicitor badge refund 50.00 Jim Cam LLC 50.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 01/11/2018 101-1550-4300 replacement of lighting contactor/houseing/wiring 1,127.50 K2 Electrical Services Inc 01/11/2018 101-1550-4300 warming house inspections 150.00 K2 Electrical Services Inc 1,277.50 KNOBLAUCH BUILDERS LLC 01/04/2018 815-8202-2024 Erosion escrow-260 Preserve Court 250.00 KNOBLAUCH BUILDERS LLC 250.00 KOTTKE BRENT & BRIANA 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 8.51 KOTTKE BRENT & BRIANA 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 14.86 KOTTKE BRENT & BRIANA 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.26 KOTTKE BRENT & BRIANA 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.54 KOTTKE BRENT & BRIANA 24.17 LAND TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.14 LAND TITLE 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.05 LAND TITLE 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.66 LAND TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.33 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 6 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount LAND TITLE 14.18 LI NING 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.58 LI NING 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.57 LI NING 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.47 LI NING 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.49 LI NING 26.11 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.64 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.34 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 17.72 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 28.22 LIBERTY TITLE INC 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 23.00 LIBERTY TITLE INC 83.92 Linn Star Transfer Inc 01/11/2018 101-0000-2033 Refund permit overpayment 30.00 Linn Star Transfer Inc 30.00 Mathews Katie 01/11/2018 101-0000-1027 Petty Cash-Feb Fest apparel sales 100.00 Mathews Katie 01/11/2018 101-0000-1027 Petty Cash-Feb Fest ticket sales 200.00 Mathews Katie 300.00 MCKAY BRIAN & ELIZABETH 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.31 MCKAY BRIAN & ELIZABETH 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.56 MCKAY BRIAN & ELIZABETH 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.95 MCKAY BRIAN & ELIZABETH 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 24.52 MCKAY BRIAN & ELIZABETH 37.34 METRO AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOC 01/04/2018 101-1120-4360 Membership dues-Gerhardt 45.00 METRO AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOC 01/04/2018 101-1120-4360 Membership dues-Petersen 45.00 METRO AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOC 90.00 Metro Cities 01/11/2018 101-1120-4360 2018 Membership Dues 8,278.00 Metro Cities 8,278.00 Metro Fire Chief Officers Association 01/04/2018 101-1220-4360 member dues-Johnson 100.00 Metro Fire Chief Officers Association 100.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 01/11/2018 720-0000-4300 Citizen assist monitor prj 2,675.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 01/11/2018 701-0000-4509 Waste Water services 152,094.89 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 154,769.89 MINNESOTA AIR 01/11/2018 101-1220-4530 relay tim delay for indoor fan 111.21 MINNESOTA AIR 111.21 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 45.64 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 7 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MINNESOTA TITLE 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 33.37 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 7.95 MINNESOTA TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.47 MINNESOTA TITLE 88.43 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 13.17 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.44 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 98.60 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 93.77 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL 207.98 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL TITLE SERVICES01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 50.06 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL TITLE SERVICES01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.50 MINNETONKA TITLE RESIDENTIAL TITLE SERVICES 51.56 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/04/2018 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00405.01.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 76.01 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/04/2018 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00405.01.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.58 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/04/2018 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00405.01.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.61 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01/04/2018 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00405.01.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 16.80 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 112.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 01/11/2018 720-0000-4360 MS4 General Stormwater Permit 400.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 01/11/2018 701-0000-4370 Wastewater Certification Exam-Crooks 55.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 01/11/2018 701-0000-4370 Wastewater Certification Renewal-Johnson 23.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 478.00 Modular Space Corporation 01/04/2018 101-1617-4410 warming house rent 2,501.84 Modular Space Corporation 2,501.84 MORTON SALT 01/11/2018 101-1320-4150 bulk safe-t-salt 3,863.08 MORTON SALT 3,863.08 Natural Surroundings Inc.01/11/2018 720-7025-4530 repair draintile behind curb on Vineland Ct 1,792.60 Natural Surroundings Inc. 1,792.60 NOBLE WINDOWS INC 01/11/2018 101-1170-4510 bronze annealed glass/screens 667.75 NOBLE WINDOWS INC 667.75 OLSEN COMPANIES 01/11/2018 701-0000-4300 hoist annual inspection 275.00 OLSEN COMPANIES 275.00 PARTNERS TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.36 PARTNERS TITLE 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.72 PARTNERS TITLE 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.33 PARTNERS TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.68 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 8 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount PARTNERS TITLE 21.09 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 66.16 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 123.13 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.18 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.63 PILLAR TITLE SERVICES 196.10 POSTMASTER 12/29/2017 700-0000-4330 Utility Statements 328.88 POSTMASTER 12/29/2017 701-0000-4330 Utility Statements 328.88 POSTMASTER 657.76 Potentia MN Solar 01/11/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 1,113.29 Potentia MN Solar 01/11/2018 101-1170-4320 electricity charges 1,628.65 Potentia MN Solar 01/11/2018 101-1190-4320 electricity charges 2,063.93 Potentia MN Solar 4,805.87 PRECISE MRM LLC 01/11/2018 101-1320-4310 pooled data plan/network access fee 190.89 PRECISE MRM LLC 01/11/2018 101-1550-4310 pooled data plan/network access fee 178.25 PRECISE MRM LLC 369.14 PULLTABS PLUS INC 01/11/2018 101-1560-4130 bingo daubers 34.36 PULLTABS PLUS INC 01/11/2018 101-1560-4130 bingo supplies 115.97 PULLTABS PLUS INC 150.33 R.E.C. Inc.01/11/2018 815-8226-2024 As-Built escrow-8703 Riley Curve 2,500.00 R.E.C. Inc. 2,500.00 RAMSEY COUNTY 01/11/2018 720-7025-4751 Family of Christ Raingarden replacement plants 108.00 RAMSEY COUNTY 108.00 RILEY BUS SERVICE INC 01/11/2018 101-1560-4300 bus service 700.00 RILEY BUS SERVICE INC 700.00 SANDBERG CHRIS 01/11/2018 101-1320-4240 jeans 125.96 SANDBERG CHRIS 125.96 SCHEURICH DOUG & TERRI 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.56 SCHEURICH DOUG & TERRI 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 84.86 SCHEURICH DOUG & TERRI 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 10.21 SCHEURICH DOUG & TERRI 104.63 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 01/11/2018 101-1190-4510 clothes hook 5.49 SHOREWOOD TRUE VALUE 5.49 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 9 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount SIEGLE CHARLES 01/11/2018 101-1370-4240 jeans 199.95 SIEGLE CHARLES 199.95 SIENA TITLE 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.26 SIENA TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.88 SIENA TITLE 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 19.77 SIENA TITLE 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 43.72 SIENA TITLE 70.63 SIGNSOURCE 01/11/2018 101-1370-4510 ADA room id signs 334.00 SIGNSOURCE 01/04/2018 101-1170-4110 name plates 192.50 SIGNSOURCE 526.50 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 01/11/2018 101-1160-4220 Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection License Upg 1,028.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 01/11/2018 400-4126-4703 MS Access-Kerr and Madsen 400.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 01/04/2018 400-4117-4703 Exchange CALS w SA client licenses 2,225.00 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 3,653.00 Southwest Suburban Publishing 01/11/2018 101-1110-4340 printing/advertising 292.34 Southwest Suburban Publishing 01/11/2018 101-1410-4340 printing/advertising 52.87 Southwest Suburban Publishing 345.21 STATE OF MINNESOTA 01/11/2018 101-1320-4140 DOT inspection decals 25.33 STATE OF MINNESOTA 01/11/2018 101-1550-4140 DOT inspection decals 25.33 STATE OF MINNESOTA 01/11/2018 700-0000-4140 DOT inspection decals 25.34 STATE OF MINNESOTA 76.00 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 6.61 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 9.61 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.72 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.50 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.78 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 21.06 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.32 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 0.43 STEWART TITLE COMPANY 60.03 Strong Vanessa 01/04/2018 720-0000-4380 Mileage-BWSR Academy Conference 149.80 Strong Vanessa 149.80 Suburban Utilities Superintendent Assoc 01/11/2018 700-0000-4360 Memberhip-Crooks 62.50 Suburban Utilities Superintendent Assoc 01/11/2018 701-0000-4360 Memberhip-Crooks 62.50 Suburban Utilities Superintendent Assoc 01/11/2018 700-0000-4360 Memberhip-Casebeer 125.00 Suburban Utilities Superintendent Assoc 01/11/2018 701-0000-4360 Memberhip-Martinson 62.50 Suburban Utilities Superintendent Assoc 01/11/2018 700-0000-4360 Memberhip-Martinson 62.50 Suburban Utilities Superintendent Assoc 375.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 10 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount SUSAN & KENNETH 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 20.41 SUSAN & KENNETH 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 25.17 SUSAN & KENNETH 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 4.60 SUSAN & KENNETH 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.48 SUSAN & KENNETH 51.66 The Garden By The Woods 01/11/2018 101-1550-4150 Ornamental, Annual basket 45.00 The Garden By The Woods 01/11/2018 101-1550-4150 Custom containers & wreaths 130.00 The Garden By The Woods 01/11/2018 101-1550-4150 Ornamental, annual basket/annuals 95.00 The Garden By The Woods 01/11/2018 101-1550-4150 Ornamental, annuals 63.00 The Garden By The Woods 333.00 Top-All Roofing Inc 01/11/2018 101-1170-4510 preventative maintenance 2,300.00 Top-All Roofing Inc 2,300.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 01/11/2018 410-0000-4710 Foxwood Preserve Phase 1 fence 18,700.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 18,700.00 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/11/2018 101-1550-4150 DP Cont 30A 3P 24V 39.04 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 39.04 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/04/2018 101-1220-4350 January garbage service 25.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/04/2018 101-1220-4350 January garbage service 64.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/04/2018 101-1190-4350 January garbage service 197.00 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/04/2018 101-1170-4350 January garbage service 160.65 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 446.65 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 11.07 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 25.12 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.12 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.39 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 54.38 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 86.87 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.74 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.36 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY 196.05 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.58 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 28.11 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 3.71 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.64 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.18 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 2.25 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 32.45 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 50.34 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC 144.26 WEST TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 139.92 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 11 of 12 Name Check Da Account Description Amount WEST TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 59.46 WEST TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 28.41 WEST TITLE LLC 01/11/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 5.27 WEST TITLE LLC 233.06 562,209.49 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (01/12/2018 - 10:18 AM)Page 12 of 12 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM Name Check D Account Description Amount A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 01/11/2018 701-0000-4530 remove old lift station control panel/install new 2,057.98 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 01/11/2018 701-0000-4300 remove old lift station control panel/install new 48.00 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 01/11/2018 701-0000-4551 LS 10-transfer switch/get run signal to telemetry panel 70.00 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 01/11/2018 700-0000-4530 LS 32-install receptacle for UPS in control panel 115.37 A-1 ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,291.35 ACCELA, INC #774375 01/04/2018 400-4117-4703 annual maintenance 31,561.00 ACCELA, INC #774375 01/04/2018 700-0000-4300 annual maintenance 3,235.75 ACCELA, INC #774375 01/04/2018 701-0000-4300 annual maintenance 3,235.75 ACCELA, INC #774375 01/04/2018 720-0000-4300 annual maintenance 3,235.76 ACCELA, INC #774375 41,268.26 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 01/04/2018 101-1170-4300 serviced indoor rodent stations 125.00 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC 125.00 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/11/2018 701-0000-4300 I & C services 1,688.00 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 1,688.00 Al-Hilwani Juli 01/11/2018 101-1533-4300 personal training-Flolid 146.25 Al-Hilwani Juli 146.25 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus01/04/2018 101-0000-2008 December premium 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 BATTERIES PLUS 01/11/2018 700-0000-4150 D & 6V 108.68 BATTERIES PLUS 108.68 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 01/11/2018 101-0000-2012 Monthly Cobra participation fee-Oct - Dec 60.00 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 01/11/2018 101-0000-2012 Cobra renewal processing fee 233.75 BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 293.75 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 01/11/2018 101-1140-4302 legal services-December 12,034.61 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 12,034.61 CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 400-4117-4703 on site training reimbursement 104.74 CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 701-7025-4703 on site training reimbursement 104.74 CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 720-7025-4703 on site training reimbursement 104.74 CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 700-7025-4703 on site training reimbursement 104.74 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM)Page 1 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 400-4117-4703 on site training reimbursement 246.86 CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 700-7025-4703 on site training reimbursement 246.85 CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 701-7025-4703 on site training reimbursement 246.85 CarteGraph Systems 01/11/2018 720-7025-4703 on site training reimbursement 246.86 CarteGraph Systems 1,406.38 Carver County 01/11/2018 101-1210-4300 4th quarter overtime 16,141.04 Carver County 01/11/2018 720-7205-4300 AIS Watercraft inspections 49,668.54 Carver County 01/11/2018 101-1120-4300 background investigation-Oasis Therapy Massage 250.00 Carver County 66,059.58 CARVER SWCD 01/11/2018 400-0000-1155 Anthem at the Park 110.00 CARVER SWCD 01/11/2018 400-0000-1155 Arbor Glen 302.50 CARVER SWCD 01/11/2018 400-0000-1155 Fawn Hill 192.50 CARVER SWCD 01/11/2018 400-0000-1155 Power Ridge Apt 2nd 110.00 CARVER SWCD 01/11/2018 400-0000-1155 West Park 192.50 CARVER SWCD 907.50 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/04/2018 101-1160-4220 Sonicwall Advanced Threat Protection 630.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/04/2018 400-4126-4703 HP Chassis Switch - Core Switch 4,344.69 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/04/2018 400-4126-4703 PW Vmware Host Server 9,708.69 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/04/2018 400-4126-4703 Install and configure new server 1,080.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/04/2018 400-4126-4703 Aruba wireless access points-city hall 1,831.69 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.01/04/2018 101-1160-4300 Network services retainer 3,000.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 20,595.07 DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES 01/11/2018 400-4118-4751 Professional fees-campus improvements 70.00 DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES 70.00 Diamond Snow & Ice Control 01/11/2018 101-1320-4150 Ice B' Gone liquid deicer 1,950.00 Diamond Snow & Ice Control 1,950.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 01/11/2018 700-0000-4300 water samples-December 350.00 Engel Water Testing Inc 350.00 EnviroTech Services Inc.01/11/2018 101-1320-4150 calcium chloride 510.00 EnviroTech Services Inc. 510.00 FASTENAL COMPANY 01/11/2018 101-1320-4140 HCS 5/8-11 x 54 YZ8 6.74 FASTENAL COMPANY 01/11/2018 101-1320-4120 Drop-in 3/8 / 1/2x6 PP Drill Bit 11.23 FASTENAL COMPANY 01/11/2018 101-1550-4120 HCS 9/16-12x4 / 9/16-12YZ8 NENylock 9.03 FASTENAL COMPANY 01/11/2018 101-1550-4120 SDS 7/16" x 6" OAL / 1/2x4 LDT 24.62 FASTENAL COMPANY 51.62 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/11/2018 700-0000-4250 meters 6,624.88 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 6,624.88 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM)Page 2 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 01/04/2018 400-0000-4300 December locates 117.45 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 117.45 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 01/11/2018 400-0000-1155 Fawn Hills Addition 8,106.25 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 01/11/2018 601-6036-4752 2017 Street Rehab 5,350.50 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 13,456.75 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/11/2018 700-7019-4160 chlorine cylinder 80.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/11/2018 700-7019-4160 chlorine cylinder 130.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/11/2018 700-7019-4160 Azone 4,958.95 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/11/2018 700-7019-4160 chlorine cylinder 130.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/11/2018 700-7019-4160 chlorine cylinder 65.00 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 5,363.95 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 01/11/2018 101-1420-4300 DT Vision update 1,156.25 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 1,156.25 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 01/11/2018 101-1550-4400 portable toilet rental-December 775.00 IMPERIAL PORTA PALACE 775.00 Indoor Landscapes Inc 01/11/2018 101-1170-4300 January plant service 187.00 Indoor Landscapes Inc 187.00 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/11/2018 101-1170-4110 office supplies 45.64 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/11/2018 101-1170-4110 markers/pins 64.29 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/11/2018 101-1170-4110 paper/plates/forks/lam pouch 153.72 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/11/2018 101-1170-4110 office supplies 224.96 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/11/2018 101-1170-4110 office supplies 63.94 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/11/2018 101-1170-4110 staples 1.97 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/04/2018 101-1170-4110 paper 123.96 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 678.48 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC 01/11/2018 101-1550-4300 Servicie-Removed submersible pump 500.00 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC 500.00 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 01/11/2018 700-0000-4170 Cirkan 325 312.25 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 01/11/2018 101-1370-4170 unleaded 87 eth 10/uls dyed nordic B35 16,495.33 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 16,807.58 Kidd Plumbing Inc 01/04/2018 101-1220-4510 replace sink/replace thermocouple & clean water heater burner 244.00 Kidd Plumbing Inc 244.00 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 601-6040-4752 Galpin Blvd Reconstruct 2,273.70 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 720-0000-4300 CSAH 14/Bob Haak Drainage 2,162.40 KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 4,436.10 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM)Page 3 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc.01/11/2018 101-1370-4510 Lens for light fixtures 886.80 Lighting Plastics of MN, Inc. 886.80 Mansfield Oil Company 01/11/2018 101-1370-4170 Uls B5DY w/ add dyed 6,151.58 Mansfield Oil Company 01/11/2018 101-1370-4170 87 unl w/10% eth 7,988.64 Mansfield Oil Company 14,140.22 Marco Inc 01/11/2018 101-1170-4410 Monthly maintenance charges 675.65 Marco Inc 01/11/2018 700-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges 100.00 Marco Inc 01/11/2018 701-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges 100.00 Marco Inc 01/11/2018 720-0000-4410 Monthly maintenance charges 50.00 Marco Inc 925.65 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 101-1310-4140 misc parts/supplies 10.24 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 101-1320-4120 misc parts/supplies 38.84 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 101-1320-4150 misc parts/supplies 57.21 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 101-1320-4560 misc parts/supplies 17.71 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 101-1350-4565 misc parts/supplies 46.78 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 101-1550-4120 misc parts/supplies 979.74 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 101-1617-4130 misc parts/supplies 5.02 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 700-0000-4150 misc parts/supplies 275.75 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 700-0000-4510 misc parts/supplies 43.18 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 700-0000-4530 misc parts/supplies 8.99 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 700-0000-4550 misc parts/supplies 4.13 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 700-7019-4530 misc parts/supplies 37.41 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 700-7019-4550 misc parts/supplies 13.99 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 01/11/2018 700-7019-4530 misc parts/supplies 28.78 MERLINS ACE HARDWARE 1,567.77 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 01/11/2018 101-1250-3816 SAC-December -298.20 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 01/11/2018 701-0000-2023 SAC-December 29,820.00 Metropolitan Council, Env Svcs 29,521.80 Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories, Inc.01/11/2018 700-0000-4150 testing 160.00 Minnesota Valley Testing Laboratories, Inc. 160.00 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 01/11/2018 101-1250-3818 Surcharge-December -49.99 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 01/11/2018 101-0000-2022 Surcharge-December 2,511.04 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY 2,461.05 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.01/11/2018 101-1520-4360 Membership-Ruegemer 140.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.01/11/2018 101-1520-4360 Membership-Sarles 140.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.01/11/2018 101-1520-4360 Membership-Bill 140.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.01/11/2018 101-1520-4360 Membership-Beers 140.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.01/11/2018 101-1520-4360 Membership-Mathews 140.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.01/11/2018 101-1520-4360 Agency Membership 450.00 MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC.01/11/2018 101-1520-4360 Membership-Hoffman 140.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM)Page 4 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 1,290.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 5,121.76 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 36.72 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 186.47 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 533.85 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 229.68 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 45.34 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 91.27 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/04/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 28.12 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 6,273.21 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 01/11/2018 101-1110-4360 2018 annual dues 6,362.00 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 6,362.00 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/11/2018 101-1550-4120 straight tubing 22.60 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/11/2018 700-0000-4140 oil filters/atp filter/grommet/gauge 122.99 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/11/2018 700-0000-4140 grommet -3.77 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 141.82 OPG-3, Inc 01/11/2018 400-4124-4703 Laserfiche full client 2,960.00 OPG-3, Inc 01/11/2018 101-1160-4370 Laserfiche professional services training retainer 2,775.00 OPG-3, Inc 5,735.00 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/11/2018 101-1550-4140 misc parts/supplies 74.05 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/11/2018 700-0000-4120 misc parts/supplies 64.68 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/11/2018 700-0000-4150 misc parts/supplies 60.00 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/11/2018 101-1320-4140 misc parts/supplies 125.03 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/11/2018 101-1550-4120 misc parts/supplies 64.68 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 01/11/2018 101-1320-4120 misc parts/supplies 64.68 O'Reilly Automotive Inc 453.12 Park Construction Co 01/11/2018 410-0000-4706 Bandimere Park Improvements 2,717.35 Park Construction Co 01/11/2018 410-0000-4706 Bandimere Park Improvements 2,717.35 Park Construction Co 5,434.70 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 01/11/2018 101-1550-4140 return tires -464.08 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 01/11/2018 101-1550-4140 tires 1,171.52 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC 707.44 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 01/11/2018 101-1320-4120 flange nut 34.73 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 34.73 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 01/04/2018 720-7202-4300 Fox Woods Buckthorn Cutting/Missed Corner Buckthorn cutting 5,575.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 01/04/2018 720-7025-4751 Lk Susan Vegetation Management 375.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 01/04/2018 720-7025-4751 Kerber Pond Vegetation Management 375.00 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 01/04/2018 720-7025-4751 Liberty @ Bluff Creek-restoration 2,223.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM)Page 5 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 8,548.00 Premium Waters, Inc 01/11/2018 101-1550-4120 monthly service-January 10.30 Premium Waters, Inc 01/11/2018 101-1550-4120 Monthly service-December 10.30 Premium Waters, Inc 20.60 PRO STAFF 01/04/2018 101-1120-4020 Receptionist 109.00 PRO STAFF 109.00 Pro-Tec Design, Inc.01/04/2018 400-4148-4703 Camera-Finance window 1,033.09 Pro-Tec Design, Inc.01/04/2018 400-4126-4703 Proximity cards-access control 404.00 Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 1,437.09 Quality Flow Systems Inc 01/11/2018 701-0000-4551 LS 7 repairs 1,200.00 Quality Flow Systems Inc 1,200.00 REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 01/11/2018 101-1130-4301 2017 audit servcies 7,300.00 REDPATH AND COMPANY, LTD 7,300.00 SOUTH ST PAUL STEEL SUPPLY CO 01/11/2018 101-1320-4120 HR Channel/Pipe Galv/Round Tube Dom 264.54 SOUTH ST PAUL STEEL SUPPLY CO 01/11/2018 101-1550-4120 HR Channel/Pipe Galv/Round Tube Dom 529.09 SOUTH ST PAUL STEEL SUPPLY CO 01/11/2018 700-0000-4120 HR Channel/Pipe Galv/Round Tube Dom 264.54 SOUTH ST PAUL STEEL SUPPLY CO 1,058.17 SPS Companies-St Louis Park 01/11/2018 101-1370-4530 auto flushing controls 182.54 SPS Companies-St Louis Park 01/11/2018 101-1370-4530 auto flushing controls 273.08 SPS Companies-St Louis Park 455.62 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 01/11/2018 101-1310-4300 Century Blvd/Corporate Place Ped Crossing Study 1,076.81 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 1,076.81 United Farmers Cooperative 01/11/2018 101-1320-4120 helmet/visor/carrier/bar & chain 155.73 United Farmers Cooperative 01/11/2018 101-1320-4240 neck gaiter/liner mask 31.98 United Farmers Cooperative 187.71 UNITED WAY 01/04/2018 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00405.01.2018 United Way 28.40 UNITED WAY 28.40 USA BLUE BOOK 01/11/2018 701-0000-4160 10 lb premium "big blue" bio-block 760.01 USA BLUE BOOK 760.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1170-4310 cellular phone charges 31.81 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1260-4310 cellular phone charges 98.63 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1130-4310 cellular phone charges 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1250-4310 cellular phone charges 144.81 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM)Page 6 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1310-4310 cellular phone charges 297.89 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1370-4310 cellular phone charges 151.93 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1320-4310 cellular phone charges 338.91 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1220-4310 cellular phone charges 488.11 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1550-4310 cellular phone charges 405.22 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1520-4310 cellular phone charges 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1600-4310 cellular phone charges 260.21 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1530-4310 cellular phone charges 51.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1120-4310 cellular phone charges 374.56 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-0000-2006 cellular phone charges 10.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 700-0000-4310 cellular phone charges 610.95 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 701-0000-4310 cellular phone charges 476.94 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 720-0000-4310 cellular phone charges 118.32 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-0000-2006 cellular phone charges 10.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/11/2018 101-1160-4310 cellular phone charges 113.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/04/2018 101-1220-4310 monthly charges 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 4,125.80 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc.01/11/2018 101-1320-4370 Registration-Larsen/Sabinske/Bresnahan/Maczko 179.80 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc.01/11/2018 101-1320-4370 Registration-Burke/Sandberg/Pratley/Abernathy 179.80 Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. 359.60 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 01/04/2018 720-0000-4300 Local Plan Update Completion 3,792.50 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 3,792.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 701-0000-4300 Sewer Cad Model update & analysis 2,619.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 700-7047-4752 West Water Treatment plant 21,511.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 420-0000-4300 2017 Pavement Inspections 2,707.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 700-7047-4752 West Water Treatment Plant CMT's 7,063.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 400-0000-1155 Avienda Development review 1,224.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 410-0000-4706 Manchester Park 80.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 720-0000-4300 2017 Storm water & GPS GIS/AMS Support 786.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 701-0000-4300 Sewer & Water GIS/AMS Support 429.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/11/2018 700-0000-4300 Sewer & Water GIS/AMS Support 357.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 36,778.25 WW GRAINGER INC 01/11/2018 701-0000-4530 electric utility heater 184.09 WW GRAINGER INC 01/11/2018 700-7019-4530 rod hanger plate/HVAC motor 69.47 WW GRAINGER INC 253.56 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/04/2018 101-1540-4320 electricity charges 174.02 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/04/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 45.83 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/04/2018 101-1550-4320 electricity charges 95.71 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/04/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 40.41 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/04/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 21,088.09 XCEL ENERGY INC 21,444.06 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM)Page 7 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount 365,273.76 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (01/12/2018 - 10:11 AM)Page 8 of 8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Letter from Xcel Energy dated January 29, 2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.3. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Xcel Energy 01­29­2018 414 Nicollet Mall, 414-06 Minneapolis, MN 55401 1-800-895-4999 xcelenergy.com January 29, 2018 Via Electronic Filing and U.S. Mail Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East, Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101 RE: Notice of Election to Seek Local Review of Proposed approximately 1.5 mile 115 kV Transmission Line to Lake Hazeltine Substation in Chanhassen and Chaska, Carver County, Minnesota Dear Mr. Wolf: In accordance with the Power Plant Siting Act (PPSA), Minn. Stat. § 216E.05, subd. 3, and Minn. R. 7850.5300, subp. 3, this letter, filed via eFiling, serves as the required notice to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission) that Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation (Xcel Energy) intends to seek local review and approval to construct an approximately 1.5-mile, 115 kilovolt (kV) transmission line with approximately 18 structures and associated features to serve electricity to the City of Chaska’s Lake Hazeltine Substation (Figure 1). Project Location The Project site is located in Carver County, Minnesota, beginning in Chanhassen and ending at the Lake Hazeltine Substation in Chaska. It spans from the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Carver County Road 18 (Lyman Boulevard) and County Road 15 (Audubon Road) in the city of Chanhassen to the new Lake Hazeltine Substation located south of Columbia Court North in the city of Chaska. The transmission line is located in portions of Section 22, Township 116N, Range 23W and the north half of Section 21, Township 116N, R23W, (Figure 1). The proposed transmission line will be located in an area of agricultural and industrial land, adjacent to railroad and county roads. The project crosses the north shore of Lake Hazeltine south of the city of Chaska’s Lake Hazeltine Substation near where the proposed transmiss ion line would connect to the substation (Figure 1). Mr. Daniel Wolf January 29, 2018 Page 2 Project Need The City of Chaska is constructing the Lake Hazeltine Substation to serve 50 megawatts (MW) of electrical load, including 24 MW to repla8ce the removed Downtown Chaska Substation and to serve the customers on the north end of Chaska made up of primarily Industrial customers. In order to provide electric service to Chaska’s Lake Hazeltine substation, a new transmission line is required to connect to the existing Xcel Energy transmission line located along the east side of County Road 15 (Audubon Road). Project Description Xcel Energy proposes to construct an approximately 1.5 -mile long, double circuit, 115 kV transmission line on 18 structures and associated facilities. As shown on Figure 1, the proposed transmission line route will connect tangent to and extend from the existing transmission line along the southeast side of the intersection of County Road 18 (Lyman Boulevard) and County Road 15 (Audubon Road) in Chanhassen. It will run approximately 80 feet southwest of, and parallel to, County Road 18 (Lyman Boulevard) for approximately 0.62 miles to the south side of the Twin Cities and Western Railroad tracks. The transmission line will then turn to the southwest It will run parallel to the railroad right -of-way for approximately 0.55 miles to the north shore of Lake Hazeltine. The transmission line will turn to the northwest, cross the railroad tracks and run for approximately 0.24 miles where it will connect to and end at Chaska’s La ke Hazeltine Substation located along the west side of Columbia Court North in Chaska, Minnesota. The proposed transmission line will use single pole, horizontal or braced post structures composed of self-weathering steel. The structures will be approximat ely 80-110 feet high with a span length of approximately 300-550 feet. Structures will be constructed using approximately 6 to 10-foot diameter reinforced concrete pier foundations. Local Governmental Unit The City of Chaska (City) is the local government al unit (LGU) for the Project. While the project is located within both the cities of Chanhassen and Chaska, the City of Chanhassen has agreed that the City of Chaska will serve as the LGU for the project (Exhibit 2). While the Project is required to be approved by the Commission pursuant to the PPSA, Minn. Stat. §216E.05 and Minn. R. 7850.5300, Xcel Energy intends to seek local review and approval from the City of Chaska via the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process. City of Chaska staff has indicated they are willing to review and grant a CUP for the Project. On January 17, 2018, Xcel Energy submitted a CUP application to the City of Chaska for review and approval of the Project. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 216E.05, subd. 1(b) and Minn. R. 7850.5300, subp. 4, the City of Chaska has been notified that it has 60 days to refer permitting the Project to the Commission. Additionally, Xcel Energy will work with other applicable regulatory agencies to obtain any required Project specific permits such as the City o f Chanhassen’s CUP, public land, water, and wetland crossings. Xcel Energy provided notice to those persons on the Commission’s General Notification List that a permit for the Project has been applied for from the City of Chaska in accordance with Minn. R. 7850.5300, subp. 3. Questions for the City of Chaska regarding this Project and the Mr. Daniel Wolf January 29, 2018 Page 3 Chaska CUP process should be directed to Elizabeth Hanson, Chaska City Planner, at (952) 448 - 9200, or me at (612) 330-5925 or Brian.E.Sullivan@xcelenergy.com. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, XCEL ENERGY Brian Sullivan Senior Siting and Land Rights Agent Enclosure: Figure 1, Figure 2 CC: Elizabeth Hanson, City Planner, City of Chaska - w/encl. Deborah Pile, Office of Energy Security - w/encl. Commission’s General Notification List - w/encl. Affidavit of service on: General List of Interested Persons – w/encl. Tim Rogers, Mgr. Xcel Energy Chanhassen Chanhassen Chaska Chaska Lake Hazeltine Substation Bluff Creek Substation Start: Connection point to existing tranmsision line End: Connection point to Lake Hazeltine Substation 019-250210100HOLASEK FAR MS LP 019-250220100IND SCHOOL D IST 112 019-250220700IND SCHOOL D IST 112 019-305190030ROLAND A STINSKI 019-251250210CHANHASSEN CITY 019-305330030CHASKA CITY 019-250220710CHASKA CITY 019-305390020 019-305210050BECKMAN COULTER INC 019-305290010SCHUMER LLC 019-258250020CHANHASSEN CITY 019-300220100LOIS R DEGLER REV TRUST019-305390010 019-305190050CHASKA HAZELTINE INVESTORS LLC 019-303100060LAKE REGION MFG INC 019-303100051LAKE REGION MFG INC 019-305210030 019-305190090CARDBECK CHASKA TRUST 019-305180101SUPER RADIATOR COILS LP 019-305500020141 JONATHAN BLVD LLC 019-303100030LUCRUM PROPERTIES LLC 019-305190070CARDBECK CHASKA TRUST 019-304850030W W FISH ENTERPRISES LLC 019-302800020FLUOROWARE INC 019-305330020QUALI-TECH PRODUCTS IN C 019-258080040CHRIS B & LESLIE J ERICKSON 019-258110240MERLE & JANE VOLK 019-305210020QUALI-TECH PRODUCTS IN C 019-258080050DANIEL K & ROBIN L EDMUND S 019-305180010PALEN INVESTMENTS LLC 019-305180080HAMLET GREEN LLC 019-305330010ACORN MINI-STORAGE VIII LLC 019-305180030WATERTOWER ASSOCIATES 019-309990200TWIN CITIES & WESTERN RAILROAD 019-305120090CHASKA INVESTMENT LP 019-305190021AMERICAN BLUE RIBBON HOLDINGS 019-305190130CHASKA CITY 019-305330011VR INVESTMENTS LLC 019-305140010CORNERSTONE INVESTO RS LLC 019-305180020NFK PROPERTIES 019-305190080CHASKA CITY 019-305190010CHASKA CITY 019-305160020EDEN INTERNATIONAL INC 019-302160040ARROW HAZELTINE SHORES LLC 019-302800040RICHARD ANDREW WESTIN 019-305220010CHASKA CITY 019-305180070M K KIRSCH LTD PTR SH P 019-305180060HAMLET GREEN LLC 019-305190040CHASKA CITY 019-258080051DARYL W & CATHERINE M HARTSEL 019-305190100CARDBECK CHASKA TRUST 019-305180090JONATHAN DEV CORP ETAL 019-305190060CHASKA CITY 019-305180090JONATHAN DEV CORP ETAL 019-305190120CHASKA CITY 019-305270020STEVEN J & PAMELA ANDERSO N 019-300210300CHASKA CITY 019-305180011CHASKA CITY 019-305390030LAKE REGION MFG INC 019-258120130GARY L FELDICK 019-305210040KEVIN L AND VIK 019-305500010STEEL PEAK LLC 019-305160010CHASKA CITY 019-251280080NICHOLAS R FRIANT 019-250221500CHANHASSEN CITY 019-251280010STEVE D BARKER 019-305220020CHASKA CITY 019-251290010PHILIP J WILLIAMS 019-251290060TODD M & JONI J NELSON 019-305390040LAKE REGION MFG INC 019-251290050ERIC & MELISSA NOYES 019-251280090PAMELA K KERBER 019-251290040PAUL S & LAURA E GRAVES 019-251280050CHARLES B DODSON 019-251280070PHILIP D & MARGARET STANDAFER 019-251280060MICHAEL C & JENNIFER ANDERSON 019-258110090MICHAEL & JACQUELINE R MROSKO 019-251280120ABDALLAH A EL-SANJAK 019-251290020LYNDELL F & MARY F FREY 019-251280040ALVARO J & NANCY A GOMEZ 019-258120110DANIEL J & NANCY R LYNCH 019-251280020STEPHEN B & SANDRA L MEYER 019-300220300CHANHASSEN CITY 019-300210300CHASKA CITY 019-250221500CHANHASSEN CITY 019-305290020JAMES CARL MACDONALD 019-305210010CHASKA HAZELTINE INVESTORS LLC 019-305290030JAMES CARL MACDONALD 019-305210010CHASKA HAZELTINE INVESTORS LLC SENE, S21, T116, R23 Meandered water body, S21, T116, R23 SENW, S22, T116, R23 NENW, S22, T116, R23 SWNW, S22, T116, R23 NENE, S21, T116, R23 NWNW, S22, T116, R23 NWNE, S21, T116, R23 NESW, S22, T116, R23 SWNE, S22, T116, R23 SWNE, S21, T116, R23 NWNE, S22, T116, R23 NWSW, S22, T116, R23 NENW, S21, T116, R23 NWSE, S22, T116, R23 SENW, S21, T116, R23 NESW, S21, T116, R23 Meandered water body, S22, T116, R23 SWSE, S15, T116, R23 C o R d 1 8 L y m a n Blv d Co Rd 17N Jonathan Blvd Audubon RdLake Hazeltine Dr HazeltineDOW# 10001400 HazeltineDOW# 10001400 HazeltineDOW# 10001400 L2UBH PEM1A PEM1C PEM1A PEM1C PEM1C PEM1A PEM1A PABG PEM1Ad PEM1A PEM1C PEM1C PUBGx PEM1A PUBGx PUBG PABGx PABGx PEM1C PEM1C PEM1A PEM1A PUBGx PEM1A PEM1F PEM1A PEM1Ad PUBGx PUBGx PUBGx PUBGx PEM1A PEM1A PABG PUBGx PEM1Af 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 10 12 13 1418 17 16 15 Proposed Transmission Line and Right of Way±115kV Transmission line to Lake Hazeltine SubChaska/Chanhassen, MN0500Feet Map Document: \\westwoodps.local\GFS\Global Projects\0008258.00\GIS\BC Fig 1 overview Wet Parcels Ex Pro Line in 180117_.mxd 1/17/2018 2:59:47 PM trbramanData Source(s ): W estwood (2018); . NWI Wetland PWI Wetland LegendProposed Transmission-CL Proposed Transmission-ROW Proposed Structure1 Parcels, and Wetlands Existing Transmission LineEx. Distribution Line Figure 1 DAKOTA ANOKA HENNEPIN SCOTT CARVER WASHINGTONRAMSEY Figure 2 First Name Last Name Email Company Name Address Delivery Method View Trade Secret Service List Name James J. Bertrand james.bertrand@stinson.com Stinson Leonard Street LLP 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A David Birkholz david.birkholz@state.mn.us MN Department of Commerce Suite 500 85 7th Place East St. Paul, MN 55101-2198 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Michelle F. Bissonnette michelle.bissonnette@hdrinc.com HDR Engineering, Inc. Golden Hills Office Center 701 Xenia Ave S Ste 600 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A B. Andrew Brown brown.andrew@dorsey.com Dorsey & Whitney LLP Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 554021498 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A PUC CAO consumer.puc@state.mn.us Public Utilities Commission Consumer Affairs Office 121 7th Place E Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Bill Cook bcook@rpu.org Rochester Public Utilities 4000 East River Road NE Rochester, MN 55906 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A John Crane johncranefishing@gmail.com Fishing 1250 Wee Gwaus DR SW Bemidji, MN 56601 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A George Crocker gwillc@nawo.org North American Water Office PO Box 174 Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Carl Cronin Regulatory.records@xcelenergy.com Xcel Energy 414 Nicollet Mall FL 7 Minneapolis, MN 554011993 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Thomas Davis N/A - 1161 50th Ave Sherburn, MN 556171 Paper Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Patricia DeBleeckere tricia.debleeckere@state.mn.us Public Utilities Commission Suite 350 121 Seventh Place East St. Paul, MN 55101 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A John E. Drawz jdrawz@fredlaw.com Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. Suite 4000 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 554021425 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Cory Dutcher cory.dutcher@ge.com GE Power and Water 1 River Rd. Bldg. 37-413 Schenectady, NY 12345 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Kristen Eide Tollefson N/A R-CURE 28477 N Lake Ave Frontenac, MN 55026-1044 Paper Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Scott Ek scott.ek@state.mn.us Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Annette Fiedler phydev@swrdc.org Southwest Regional Development Comm. 2401 Broadway Ave Ste 1 Slayton, MN 56172 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Karen A Gebhardt kageb1@gvtel.com 43901 253rd Ave Leonard, MN 56652-4026 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Larry Hartman Larry.Hartman@state.mn.us Department of Commerce 85 7th Place East, Suite 500 St. Paul, MN 55101 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Charles Healy chuckh@electrotech-inc.com ElectroTech, Inc 7101 Madison Ave Minneapolis, MN 55427 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Kimberly Hellwig kimberly.hellwig@stoel.com Stoel Rives LLP 33 South Sixth Street Suite 4200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Valerie Herring vherring@briggs.com Briggs and Morgan, P.A. 2200 IDS Center 80 S. Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Scott Johnson Scott.Johnson@ci.medina.mn.us City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Michael Kaluzniak mike.kaluzniak@state.mn.us Public Utilities Commission Suite 350 121 Seventh Place East St. Paul, MN 55101 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Bruce King bruce@ranww.org Realtors, Association of Northwestern WI Suite 3 1903 Keith Street Eau Claire, WI 54701 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Stacy Kotch Stacy.Kotch@state.mn.us MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 395 John Ireland Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Karen Kromar karen.kromar@state.mn.us MN Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Rd Saint Paul, MN 55155 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Kim Lindquist kim.lindquist@ci.rosemount.mn.us 2875 145th St W Rosemount, MN 55068 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Paula Maccabee Pmaccabee@justchangelaw.com Just Change Law Offices 1961 Selby Ave Saint Paul, MN 55104 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Brian Meloy brian.meloy@stinson.com Stinson,Leonard, Street LLP 150 S 5th St Ste 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Kevin Mixon kevin.mixon@state.mn.us Department of Natural Resources 261 HWY 15 S New Ulm, MN 56073 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Andrew Moratzka andrew.moratzka@stoel.com Stoel Rives LLP 33 South Sixth St Ste 4200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Colleen Mueller N/A 22186 State Hwy 4 Paynesville, MN 56362 Paper Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Steven Nyhus swnyhus@flaherty-hood.com Flaherty & Hood PA 525 Park St Ste 470 Saint Paul, MN 55103 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Kate O'Connell kate.oconnell@state.mn.us Department of Commerce Suite 50085 Seventh Place East St. Paul, MN 551012198 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Carol A. Overland overland@legalectric.org Legalectric - Overland Law Office 1110 West Avenue Red Wing, MN 55066 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Kevin Peterson kjp@ibew160.org IBEW Local 160 1109 Northway Lane NE Rochester, MN 55906 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Angela Piner angela.piner@hdrinc.com HDR, Inc. Suite 600 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 600 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Larry Rebman larryemls@hotmail.com EMLS, Inc PO Box 122 Appleton, MN 56208 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Margaret Rheude Margaret_Rheude@fws.gov U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Twin Cities Ecological Services Field Office 4101 American Blvd. E. Bloomington, MN 55425 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Rachellle Schmitz rrneevel@yahoo.com N/A Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Tom Schmitz tschmitz_rph@yahoo.com N/A Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Rod Schumacher rod.schumacher@is-grp.com I&S Group 115 E Hickry St Suite 300 Mankato, MN 56001 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A David Shaffer david.shaffer@startribune.com 425 Portland Minneapolis, MN 55488 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Tom Slukich tom@nationalconductor.com National Conductor Constructors 18119 Hwy 371 North Brainderd, MN 56401 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Adam Sokolski adam.sokolski@iberdrolaren.com Iberdrola Renewables 701 fourth Avenue South Suite 1010 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Mike Steckelberg msteckelberg@grenergy.com Great River Energy 12300 Elm Creek Boulevard Maple Grove, MN 553694718 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Matt Steinrueck BADEMAIL - msteinrueck@cleanwater.org Clean Water Action 330 Second Ave S Suite 420 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Paper Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Mark Strohfus mstrohfus@grenergy.com Great River Energy 12300 Elm Creek Boulevard Maple Grove, MN 553694718 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Carl Strohm cjsmg@sbcglobal.net SBC Global 105 East Edgewood Ave Indianapolis, IN 46227 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Tom Swafford tswafford@umsi.us Utility Mapping Services, Inc 3947 E Calvary Rd Suite 103 Duluth, MN 55803 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Eric Swanson eswanson@winthrop.com Winthrop & Weinstine 225 S 6th St Ste 3500 Capella Tower Minneapolis, MN 554024629 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Todd Tadych ttadych@atcllc.com American Transmission Company LLC 5303 Fen Oak Dr Madison, WI 53718 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Steve Thompson stevet@cmpasgroup.org Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency 459 S Grove St Blue Earth, MN 56013-2629 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Caren Warner caren.warner@state.mn.us Department of Commerce 85 7th Place East Suite 500 St. Paul, MN 55101-2198 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Cynthia Warzecha cynthia.warzecha@state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road Box 25 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4040 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A Hans van Lingen hans.vanlingen@enel.com Enel Green Power North America 1 Tech Drive Suite 220 Andover, MA 01810 Electronic Service No SPL_SL__General List 7850.2100-1A U.S Postal Service Mailing List Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East, Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101 CHANHASSEN CITY C/O Sharmeen Al-Jaff PO BOX 147 CHANHASSEN, MN 55317-0147 CHASKA CITY C/O Elizabeth Hanson 1 CITY HALL PLAZA CHASKA, MN 55318-1962 Thomas Davis 1161 50th Ave Sherburn, MN 56171 Kristen Eide Tollefson R-CURE 28477 N Lake Ave Frontenac, MN 55026-1044 Colleen Mueller 22186 State Hwy 4 Paynesville, MN 56362 Matt Steinrueck Clean Water Action 330 Second Ave S, Suite 420 Minneapolis, MN 55401 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Review of Claims Paid 2­12­18 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.4. Prepared By Greg Sticha, Finance Director File No:  SUMMARY The following claims are submitted for review on February 12, 2018: Check Numbers Amounts 166553 – 166653 $663,010.74 ACH Payments $1,285,681.61 January Visa charges                       $25,032.77 ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ Total All Claims $1,973,725.12 ATTACHMENTS: Check Summary Check Summary ACH Check Detail Check Detail ACH Accounts Payable User: Printed: dwashburn 2/1/2018 9:18 AM Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount cormai CORE & MAIN LP 01/18/2018 0.00 1,362.80166553 culbot Culligan Bottled Water 01/18/2018 0.00 70.16166554 ehlers EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 0.00 110.00166555 GooCom Goodyear Commercial Tire & Service Centers01/18/2018 0.00 192.00166556 kincom KINSALE COMMUNICATIONS INC 01/18/2018 0.00 1,950.00166557 LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/18/2018 0.00 103.50166558 lotpri Lotus Print Group, Inc.01/18/2018 0.00 454.00166559 madgal MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 01/18/2018 0.00 584.41166560 mnucfu Minnesota UC Fund 01/18/2018 0.00 2,863.23166561 spescr Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 01/18/2018 0.00 343.24166562 tayele Taylor Electric Company, LLC 01/18/2018 0.00 2,250.00166563 wingrich RICHARD WING 01/18/2018 0.00 73.33166564 Carlic CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 0.00 1,392.00166565 ccfdma CCFDMAA 01/18/2018 0.00 250.00166566 cenlin CenturyLink 01/18/2018 0.00 64.00166567 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/18/2018 0.00 1,445.83166568 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 01/18/2018 0.00 375.00166569 LEAINS LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/18/2018 0.00 64,161.00166570 MinuPre Minuteman Press 01/18/2018 0.00 16.00166571 mniaai MN CHAPTER IAAI 01/18/2018 0.00 25.00166572 reares REACH FOR RESOURCES 01/18/2018 0.00 7,500.00166573 StudFlor Florence Studinski 01/18/2018 0.00 25.00166574 TessEric Eric Tessman 01/18/2018 0.00 114.95166575 win911 WIN-911 01/18/2018 0.00 495.00166576 AdamPatr Patricia Adams 01/25/2018 0.00 39.00166577 baubui Bauer Built Inc 01/25/2018 0.00 960.00166578 billsusa SUSAN BILL 01/25/2018 0.00 62.06166579 capage CAP AGENCY 01/25/2018 0.00 2,100.00166580 cenene CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/25/2018 0.00 1,146.60166581 ChriJoan Joan Christensen 01/25/2018 0.00 39.00166582 deltoo DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/25/2018 0.00 19.78166583 ElsbRuth Ruth Elsberry 01/25/2018 0.00 39.00166584 FranShir Shirley Frantz 01/25/2018 0.00 39.00166585 GossBev Beverly Gossard 01/25/2018 0.00 39.00166586 hentec HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 01/25/2018 0.00 3,325.00166587 JOHNSJER JERRE JOHNSON 01/25/2018 0.00 39.00166588 KapaMari MARILYN-PAT KAPAUN 01/25/2018 0.00 39.00166589 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 01/25/2018 0.00 1,540.00166590 ParkMart Martha Kay Parker 01/25/2018 0.00 39.00166591 RaftArdi Ardis Rafteseth 01/25/2018 0.00 78.00166592 roaani ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 01/25/2018 0.00 880.00166593 theijim JIM THEIS 01/25/2018 0.00 155.24166594 aarp AARP 01/25/2018 0.00 375.00166595 allstr ALLSTREAM 01/25/2018 0.00 446.21166596 borsta BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/25/2018 0.00 1,177.53166597 conpla Consolidated Plastics Company 01/25/2018 0.00 223.89166598 cormai CORE & MAIN LP 01/25/2018 0.00 311.22166599 Page 1AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/1/2018 9:18 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount daktec DAKOTA COUNTY TECH COLLEGE 01/25/2018 0.00 600.00166600 earand Earl F Andersen Inc 01/25/2018 0.00 455.10166601 excapp Excelsior Appliance Sales & Service, Inc 01/25/2018 0.00 89.95166602 FerEnt Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/25/2018 0.00 99.14166603 flepri FleetPride, Inc.01/25/2018 0.00 135.66166604 GolLak Golf Lakes Condos 01/25/2018 0.00 449,430.61166605 ipma IPMA-Minnesota 01/25/2018 0.00 50.00166606 LAUPIA LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 01/25/2018 0.00 98.00166607 leamin LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 01/25/2018 0.00 20.00166608 maczpatr PATRICK MACZKO 01/25/2018 0.00 56.22166609 MadsArle Arlen Madsen 01/25/2018 0.00 123.24166610 MetrFire Metro Fire Chief Officers Association 01/25/2018 0.00 100.00166611 MNAWWA MINNESOTA AWWA 01/25/2018 0.00 245.00166612 MNPOL MN Pollution Control Agency 01/25/2018 0.00 390.00166613 modspa Modular Space Corporation 01/25/2018 0.00 1,116.70166614 nustru Nuss Truck Group Inc 01/25/2018 0.00 75.30166615 robbeain Robert Bealke Industries 01/25/2018 0.00 500.00166616 RothMich Michael Roth 01/25/2018 0.00 20.00166617 theiken KENNETH A THIES 01/25/2018 0.00 600.00166618 traadv TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL 01/25/2018 0.00 250.00166619 WastMana Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/25/2018 0.00 274.05166620 POST POSTMASTER 01/31/2018 0.00 1,271.87166621 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 02/01/2018 0.00 4,432.50166622 signso SIGNSOURCE 02/01/2018 0.00 62,903.08166623 tayele Taylor Electric Company, LLC 02/01/2018 0.00 10,925.00166624 bcatra BCA 02/01/2018 0.00 15.00166625 bercof BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 02/01/2018 0.00 532.06166626 borsta BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 02/01/2018 0.00 2,703.14166627 CHAPET CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 02/01/2018 0.00 250.00166628 SHAKOP CITY OF SHAKOPEE 02/01/2018 0.00 2,100.00166629 cormai CORE & MAIN LP 02/01/2018 0.00 16.10166630 dezuri DeZurik, Inc.02/01/2018 0.00 99.00166631 farradam ADAM FARRELL 02/01/2018 0.00 147.89166632 FerrStev Steve Ferraro 02/01/2018 0.00 127.46166633 grabar GRAYBAR 02/01/2018 0.00 357.14166634 hach Hach Company 02/01/2018 0.00 343.14166635 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 02/01/2018 0.00 1,445.83166636 Loc49 IUOE Local #49 02/01/2018 0.00 788.30166637 leamin LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 02/01/2018 0.00 577.00166638 FavrKati Katie Mathews 02/01/2018 0.00 300.00166639 mettes Metro Testing 02/01/2018 0.00 30.05166640 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/01/2018 0.00 112.00166641 msfca MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.02/01/2018 0.00 398.00166642 UB*01338 MOLITOR ASSOCIATES 02/01/2018 0.00 31.69166643 moomed MOORE MEDICAL 02/01/2018 0.00 66.07166644 morsal MORTON SALT 02/01/2018 0.00 6,659.64166645 norpow NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP CO 02/01/2018 0.00 634.27166646 recinc R.E.C. Inc.02/01/2018 0.00 2,500.00166647 RustNyra Nyra Rustad 02/01/2018 0.00 65.00166648 SarlJodi Jodi Sarles 02/01/2018 0.00 200.00166649 SETON SETON 02/01/2018 0.00 505.30166650 shawjame James M. Shaw 02/01/2018 0.00 95.00166651 SpeScr Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 02/01/2018 0.00 3,444.24166652 uniren UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAYS TECH 02/01/2018 0.00 4,873.02166653 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/1/2018 9:18 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Void Checks Check Amount Report Total (101 checks): 663,010.74 0.00 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (2/1/2018 9:18 AM) Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Summary by Check User: dwashburn Printed: 2/1/2018 9:18 AM Check No Vendor Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH braint BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 01/18/2018 0.00 2,913.25 ACH cambar CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 01/18/2018 0.00 830.00 ACH carcou Carver County 01/18/2018 0.00 547.50 ACH choice Choice, Inc. 01/18/2018 0.00 162.27 ACH delden Delta Dental 01/18/2018 0.00 2,633.20 ACH dollif DOLLIFF INC. INSURANCE 01/18/2018 0.00 225.00 ACH gopsta GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 01/18/2018 0.00 50.00 ACH sticgreg GREG STICHA 01/18/2018 0.00 13.00 ACH gsdir GS DIRECT INC 01/18/2018 0.00 369.60 ACH heastr Health Strategies 01/18/2018 0.00 191.50 ACH HeaStr Health Strategies 01/18/2018 0.00 260.00 ACH innoff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/18/2018 0.00 290.98 ACH icc INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 01/18/2018 0.00 155.00 ACH AlhiJuli Juli Al-Hilwani 01/18/2018 0.00 34.50 ACH keitar KEITH'S TARPS INC 01/18/2018 0.00 187.37 ACH mvec MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/18/2018 0.00 228.91 ACH OPG-3 OPG-3, Inc 01/18/2018 0.00 13,230.00 ACH protec Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 01/18/2018 0.00 14,601.77 ACH rbmser RBM SERVICES INC 01/18/2018 0.00 4,457.62 ACH riclak RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 01/18/2018 0.00 999,875.00 ACH SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 01/18/2018 0.00 103.44 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 01/18/2018 0.00 28.40 ACH wenck WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 0.00 9,639.10 ACH wmmue WM MUELLER & SONS INC 01/18/2018 0.00 2,724.44 ACH wsb WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 0.00 74,754.25 ACH xcel XCEL ENERGY INC 01/18/2018 0.00 804.37 ACH AdvEng Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/25/2018 0.00 4,719.68 ACH avesis Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc. 01/25/2018 0.00 178.44 ACH choele CHOICE ELECTRIC 01/25/2018 0.00 660.00 ACH civplu CivicPlus 01/25/2018 0.00 4,495.00 ACH civplu CivicPlus 01/25/2018 0.00 300.00 ACH schmdean DEAN SCHMIEG 01/25/2018 0.00 2,525.25 ACH DOLLIF DOLLIFF INC. INSURANCE 01/25/2018 0.00 23,000.00 ACH fascom FASTENAL COMPANY 01/25/2018 0.00 46.90 ACH fascom FASTENAL COMPANY 01/25/2018 0.00 191.92 ACH FergEnte Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/25/2018 0.00 7,144.22 ACH hawche HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/25/2018 0.00 15,182.46 ACH heastr Health Strategies 01/25/2018 0.00 288.00 ACH HoiKoe HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 01/25/2018 0.00 1,501.58 ACH indpla Indelco Plastics Corporation 01/25/2018 0.00 1,813.83 ACH johsup JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 01/25/2018 0.00 95.32 ACH macequ MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 01/25/2018 0.00 29.13 ACH mattri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 01/25/2018 0.00 49.80 ACH mattri Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 01/25/2018 0.00 113.22 ACH meskra MESSERLI & KRAMER P.A. 01/25/2018 0.00 1,800.00 ACH mvec MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/25/2018 0.00 129.18 ACH napa NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/25/2018 0.00 76.74 Page 1 of 2 Check No Vendor Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount ACH plafla Plant & Flanged Equipment Company 01/25/2018 0.00 307.31 ACH quaflo Quality Flow Systems Inc 01/25/2018 0.00 1,914.00 ACH STRGUA STRATOGUARD LLC 01/25/2018 0.00 160.00 ACH subche SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/25/2018 0.00 26.25 ACH sunlif Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 0.00 380.97 ACH KubiTere Terence Kenneth Kubista 01/25/2018 0.00 100.00 ACH usablu USA BLUE BOOK 01/25/2018 0.00 4,234.08 ACH VarInd Varitech Industries Inc 01/25/2018 0.00 35.22 ACH vikmat VIKING MAT COMPANY 01/25/2018 0.00 4,200.00 ACH watcon Water Conservation Services, Inc. 01/25/2018 0.00 736.35 ACH xcel XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 0.00 9,844.65 ACH aflac American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 02/01/2018 0.00 39.78 ACH batplu BATTERIES PLUS 02/01/2018 0.00 191.60 ACH CCPNIM CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 0.00 3,384.03 ACH CLASAF CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 02/01/2018 0.00 125.00 ACH collif Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 02/01/2018 0.00 257.58 ACH comint COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 02/01/2018 0.00 1,023.00 ACH innoff Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/01/2018 0.00 155.96 ACH benskaye KAYE L BENSON 02/01/2018 0.00 560.00 ACH mvec MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/01/2018 0.00 203.33 ACH nyspub NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 02/01/2018 0.00 8,298.00 ACH quaflo Quality Flow Systems Inc 02/01/2018 0.00 5,860.00 ACH UNIWAY UNITED WAY 02/01/2018 0.00 28.40 ACH UniAth Universal Athletic Services, Inc. 02/01/2018 0.00 134.45 ACH usablu USA BLUE BOOK 02/01/2018 0.00 963.88 ACH VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 02/01/2018 0.00 40.01 ACH xcel XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 0.00 43,318.28 ACH zeemed ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 02/01/2018 0.00 121.75 ACH ziegle ZIEGLER INC 02/01/2018 0.00 5,386.59 Report Total:0.00 1,285,681.61 Page 2 of 2 Accounts Payable Check Detail-Checks User: dwashburn Printed: 02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM Name Check D Account Description Amount AARP 01/25/2018 101-1560-4300 Driver Safety-Refresher Course 375.00 AARP 375.00 Adams Patricia 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-We're going to the zoo 39.00 Adams Patricia 39.00 ALLSTREAM 01/25/2018 101-1160-4300 phone system maint 2/18-5/17 446.21 ALLSTREAM 446.21 Bauer Built Inc 01/25/2018 101-1320-4120 ultra guard lvt 960.00 Bauer Built Inc 960.00 BCA 02/01/2018 101-1120-4300 background investigation 15.00 BCA 15.00 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 02/01/2018 101-1170-4110 coffee/cocoa 62.80 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 02/01/2018 101-1170-4110 coffee 469.26 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 532.06 BILL SUSAN 01/25/2018 101-1560-4370 mileage 62.06 BILL SUSAN 62.06 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01/25/2018 701-0000-4530 heaters 1,177.53 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 02/01/2018 700-0000-4530 heater/switch 2,703.14 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 3,880.67 CAP AGENCY 01/25/2018 101-1430-4300 4th quarter services 2,100.00 CAP AGENCY 2,100.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 700-0000-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 224.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 701-0000-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 96.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 101-1370-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 48.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 101-1170-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 32.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 101-1320-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 464.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 101-1420-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 16.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 101-1260-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 16.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 101-1550-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 368.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 101-1310-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 32.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM)Page 1 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01/18/2018 101-1250-4440 Vehicle/Trailer license tabs 96.00 CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 1,392.00 CCFDMAA 01/18/2018 101-1220-4360 annual dues 250.00 CCFDMAA 250.00 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/25/2018 101-1220-4320 monthly charges 727.79 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/25/2018 101-1530-4320 monthly charges 341.42 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 01/25/2018 101-1120-4320 monthly charges 77.39 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 1,146.60 CenturyLink 01/18/2018 701-0000-4310 monthly charges 32.00 CenturyLink 01/18/2018 700-0000-4310 monthly charges 32.00 CenturyLink 64.00 Christensen Joan 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-We're going to the zoo 39.00 Christensen Joan 39.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 02/01/2018 101-1611-4130 Petty Cash-Feb Fest prize 250.00 CITY OF CHANHASSEN-PETTY CASH 250.00 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 02/01/2018 101-1210-4300 2018 Drug Task Force membership dues 2,100.00 CITY OF SHAKOPEE 2,100.00 Consolidated Plastics Company 01/25/2018 101-1250-4130 plastic bags 223.89 Consolidated Plastics Company 223.89 CORE & MAIN LP 01/18/2018 700-0000-4550 lite duty box/roadway box/driveway box 1,362.80 CORE & MAIN LP 01/25/2018 700-0000-4550 valve box locking lid 171.03 CORE & MAIN LP 01/25/2018 700-0000-4550 epoxy/pipe/gasket/t-head 140.19 CORE & MAIN LP 02/01/2018 700-0000-4550 gaskets 16.10 CORE & MAIN LP 1,690.12 Culligan Bottled Water 01/18/2018 101-1220-4300 bottle water 70.16 Culligan Bottled Water 70.16 DAKOTA COUNTY TECH COLLEGE 01/25/2018 101-1320-4370 Defensive Driving-Snow Plow 600.00 DAKOTA COUNTY TECH COLLEGE 600.00 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/25/2018 101-1370-4260 drill bit/socket 15.34 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01/25/2018 101-1370-4260 6PT.5MMX1/4 4.44 DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 19.78 DeZurik, Inc.02/01/2018 700-7019-4550 12" pkg ptfe 14mm x 28.35" 99.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM)Page 2 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount DeZurik, Inc. 99.00 Earl F Andersen Inc 01/25/2018 101-1320-4560 U Channel top to flat/bracket crosspiece 455.10 Earl F Andersen Inc 455.10 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 700-0000-4300 Utility Rate Study-December 36.67 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 701-0000-4300 Utility Rate Study-December 36.67 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 720-0000-4300 Utility Rate Study-December 36.66 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 110.00 Elsberry Ruth 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-We're going to the zoo 39.00 Elsberry Ruth 39.00 Excelsior Appliance Sales & Service, Inc 01/25/2018 101-1170-4530 repair dishwasher 89.95 Excelsior Appliance Sales & Service, Inc 89.95 FARRELL ADAM 02/01/2018 101-1550-4240 boots 147.89 FARRELL ADAM 147.89 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 01/25/2018 101-1320-4150 pvc pipe/primer/gray cement 99.14 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. #1657 99.14 Ferraro Steve 02/01/2018 101-1310-4370 mileage to training 107.25 Ferraro Steve 02/01/2018 101-1320-4240 clothing 20.21 Ferraro Steve 127.46 FleetPride, Inc.01/25/2018 101-1370-4170 fluid diesel exhaust 55 gallon 135.66 FleetPride, Inc. 135.66 Frantz Shirley 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund--We're going to the zoo 39.00 Frantz Shirley 39.00 Golf Lakes Condos 01/25/2018 815-8221-2024 Security escrow reduction-Arbor Glen 449,430.61 Golf Lakes Condos 449,430.61 Goodyear Commercial Tire & Service Centers 01/18/2018 101-1320-4140 Recon-whl-2 step-prim/pwdr coat 192.00 Goodyear Commercial Tire & Service Centers 192.00 Gossard Beverly 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-We're going to the zoo 39.00 Gossard Beverly 39.00 GRAYBAR 02/01/2018 101-1350-4120 LU250/H/Eco General Electric lighting 357.14 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM)Page 3 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount GRAYBAR 357.14 Hach Company 02/01/2018 700-7019-4150 Assy pack chemkey/cup 343.14 Hach Company 343.14 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 01/25/2018 101-1220-4370 Emergency Med Responder class/books 3,325.00 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 3,325.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/18/2018 101-0000-2009 1/19/2018 ID #304303 1,114.58 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/18/2018 210-0000-2009 1/19/2018 ID #304303 25.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/18/2018 700-0000-2009 1/19/2018 ID #304303 152.51 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/18/2018 701-0000-2009 1/19/2018 ID #304303 152.48 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 01/18/2018 720-0000-2009 1/19/2018 ID #304303 1.26 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 02/01/2018 101-0000-2009 02/02/2018 ID #304303 1,114.57 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 02/01/2018 210-0000-2009 02/02/2018 ID #304303 25.00 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 02/01/2018 700-0000-2009 02/02/2018 ID #304303 152.50 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 02/01/2018 701-0000-2009 02/02/2018 ID #304303 152.50 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 02/01/2018 720-0000-2009 02/02/2018 ID #304303 1.26 ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST-457 2,891.66 IPMA-Minnesota 01/25/2018 101-1120-4360 Membership dues-Petersen 50.00 IPMA-Minnesota 50.00 IUOE Local #49 02/01/2018 101-0000-2004 PR Batch 00402.02.2018 Local 49 dues 498.09 IUOE Local #49 02/01/2018 700-0000-2004 PR Batch 00402.02.2018 Local 49 dues 197.86 IUOE Local #49 02/01/2018 701-0000-2004 PR Batch 00402.02.2018 Local 49 dues 92.35 IUOE Local #49 788.30 JOHNSON JERRE 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-We're going to the zoo 39.00 JOHNSON JERRE 39.00 KAPAUN MARILYN-PAT 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-We're going to the zoo 39.00 KAPAUN MARILYN-PAT 39.00 KINSALE COMMUNICATIONS INC 01/18/2018 101-1431-4300 Alzheimer's campaign consulting 1,950.00 KINSALE COMMUNICATIONS INC 1,950.00 Lano Equipment 01/18/2018 101-1320-4410 rental-Kubota Excavator 1/8/18 375.00 Lano Equipment 01/25/2018 400-0000-4705 snow bucket/nuts/bolts 1,540.00 Lano Equipment 02/01/2018 400-0000-4705 Bobcat S630 4,432.50 Lano Equipment 6,347.50 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 01/25/2018 101-1560-4350 tuning 98.00 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 98.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 01/25/2018 101-1120-4370 safety & loss control workshop 20.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM)Page 4 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 02/01/2018 400-4126-4703 Adobe Acrobat Pro 577.00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 597.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/18/2018 101-1170-4483 Claimi-Burns & damaged clothing when child fell on bike trail 103.50 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 01/18/2018 101-1170-4483 1st quarter work comp 64,161.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST 64,264.50 Lotus Print Group, Inc.01/18/2018 700-0000-4240 shirts 227.00 Lotus Print Group, Inc.01/18/2018 701-0000-4240 shirts 227.00 Lotus Print Group, Inc. 454.00 MACZKO PATRICK 01/25/2018 101-1320-4240 shirts 56.22 MACZKO PATRICK 56.22 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 01/18/2018 101-1140-4302 Labor Relations Services-December 584.41 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 584.41 Madsen Arlen 01/25/2018 101-1250-4240 shoes 123.24 Madsen Arlen 123.24 Mathews Katie 02/01/2018 101-0000-1027 Petty cash-Feb Fest start up change 300.00 Mathews Katie 300.00 Metro Fire Chief Officers Association 01/25/2018 101-1220-4360 Membership dues-Johnson 100.00 Metro Fire Chief Officers Association 100.00 Metro Testing 02/01/2018 101-0000-2033 refund permit overpayment 30.05 Metro Testing 30.05 MINNESOTA AWWA 01/25/2018 700-0000-4370 Operator School Registration-Monnens 245.00 MINNESOTA AWWA 245.00 Minnesota UC Fund 01/18/2018 101-1320-4060 4th quarter unemployment 1,938.86 Minnesota UC Fund 01/18/2018 700-0000-4060 4th quarter unemployment 198.45 Minnesota UC Fund 01/18/2018 701-0000-4060 4th quarter unemployment 198.45 Minnesota UC Fund 01/18/2018 101-1260-4060 4th quarter unemployment 527.47 Minnesota UC Fund 2,863.23 Minuteman Press 01/18/2018 101-1170-4110 business cards-Nutter 16.00 Minuteman Press 16.00 MN CHAPTER IAAI 01/18/2018 101-1220-4360 membership-Nutter 25.00 MN CHAPTER IAAI 25.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM)Page 5 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/01/2018 101-0000-2011 PR Batch 00402.02.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 76.01 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/01/2018 700-0000-2011 PR Batch 00402.02.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.59 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/01/2018 701-0000-2011 PR Batch 00402.02.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 9.60 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 02/01/2018 720-0000-2011 PR Batch 00402.02.2018 NCPERS-Life Insurance 16.80 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 112.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 01/25/2018 701-0000-4370 Registration-Chihos 390.00 MN Pollution Control Agency 390.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC.02/01/2018 101-1220-4360 membership dues 398.00 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. 398.00 Modular Space Corporation 01/25/2018 101-1617-4410 warming house rental 1,116.70 Modular Space Corporation 1,116.70 MOLITOR ASSOCIATES 02/01/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 12.28 MOLITOR ASSOCIATES 02/01/2018 701-0000-2020 Refund Check 16.59 MOLITOR ASSOCIATES 02/01/2018 720-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.16 MOLITOR ASSOCIATES 02/01/2018 700-0000-2020 Refund Check 1.66 MOLITOR ASSOCIATES 31.69 MOORE MEDICAL 02/01/2018 101-1220-4130 nitrile exam gloves 66.07 MOORE MEDICAL 66.07 MORTON SALT 02/01/2018 101-1320-4150 bulk safe-t-salt 851.76 MORTON SALT 02/01/2018 101-1320-4150 bulk safe-t-salt 2,920.32 MORTON SALT 02/01/2018 101-1320-4150 bulk safe-t-salt 2,887.56 MORTON SALT 6,659.64 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP CO 02/01/2018 700-0000-4550 Cla-Val 3/8" CRD 15-75 psi range 634.27 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP CO 634.27 Nuss Truck Group Inc 01/25/2018 101-1320-4140 battery cable/latch 75.30 Nuss Truck Group Inc 75.30 Parker Martha Kay 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-We're going to the zoo 39.00 Parker Martha Kay 39.00 POSTMASTER 01/31/2018 700-0000-4330 January Utility Statements 635.94 POSTMASTER 01/31/2018 701-0000-4330 January Utility Statements 635.93 POSTMASTER 1,271.87 R.E.C. Inc.02/01/2018 815-8226-2024 As-Built escrow-8695 Riley Curve 2,500.00 R.E.C. Inc. 2,500.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM)Page 6 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount Rafteseth Ardis 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-We're going to the zoo 78.00 Rafteseth Ardis 78.00 REACH FOR RESOURCES 01/18/2018 101-1600-4300 2018 Adaptive Recreation and Inclusion Contract 7,500.00 REACH FOR RESOURCES 7,500.00 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 01/25/2018 101-1320-4350 animal disposal 880.00 ROADKILL ANIMAL CONTROL 880.00 Robert Bealke Industries 01/25/2018 101-1611-4300 Feb Fest DJ 500.00 Robert Bealke Industries 500.00 Roth Michael 01/25/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-Driver Safety Refresher 20.00 Roth Michael 20.00 Rustad Nyra 02/01/2018 101-1560-3637 Refund-Dance 'til you Drop History Theatre 65.00 Rustad Nyra 65.00 Sarles Jodi 02/01/2018 101-0000-1027 Petty Cash-Dance Recital change 200.00 Sarles Jodi 200.00 SETON 02/01/2018 101-1160-4150 Duragaurd ID tags-asset tags 505.30 SETON 505.30 Shaw James M.02/01/2018 101-1560-4300 music program-2/9/18 95.00 Shaw James M. 95.00 SIGNSOURCE 02/01/2018 410-0000-4706 Park entry signs 62,903.08 SIGNSOURCE 62,903.08 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 01/18/2018 101-1617-4130 warming house jackets 82.87 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 01/18/2018 101-1250-4240 jackets/polos 260.37 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 02/01/2018 101-1611-4300 Feb Fest apparel 3,444.24 Spectrum Screen Printing Inc 3,787.48 Studinski Florence 01/18/2018 720-7202-3640 garden plot refund 25.00 Studinski Florence 25.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 01/18/2018 101-1350-4565 replace street light and base-101/MIssion Hills 2,250.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 02/01/2018 101-1350-4565 install signal cabinet & controller 10,925.00 Taylor Electric Company, LLC 13,175.00 Tessman Eric 01/18/2018 101-1250-4240 Powertrain Sport Al Blk 114.95 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM)Page 7 of 8 Name Check D Account Description Amount Tessman Eric 114.95 THEIS JIM 01/25/2018 101-1550-4240 clothing reimbursement 155.24 THEIS JIM 155.24 THIES KENNETH A 01/25/2018 101-1600-4300 Feb Fest Sleigh Rides 600.00 THIES KENNETH A 600.00 TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL 01/25/2018 101-1600-4130 Feb Fest prize 250.00 TRAVEL ADVISOR'S INTERNATIONAL 250.00 UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAYS TECH 02/01/2018 700-0000-4550 cylinder assembly/rails/hook/legs 4,873.02 UNITED RENTALS HIGHWAYS TECH 4,873.02 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/25/2018 101-1550-4350 garbage service-Janaury 157.50 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/25/2018 101-1370-4350 garbage service-Janaury 93.23 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/25/2018 700-0000-4350 garbage service-Janaury 11.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 01/25/2018 701-0000-4350 garbage service-Janaury 11.66 Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc 274.05 WIN-911 01/18/2018 700-0000-4550 annual maintenance 495.00 WIN-911 495.00 WING RICHARD 01/18/2018 101-1220-4350 Station 2 Cleaning-December 73.33 WING RICHARD 73.33 663,010.74 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-Checks (02/01/2018 - 9:24 AM)Page 8 of 8 Accounts Payable Check Detail-ACH User: dwashburn Printed: 02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM Name Check Da Account Description Amount Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/25/2018 700-0000-4530 I & C Services-December equipment 2,473.19 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 01/25/2018 700-0000-4300 I & C Services-December professional services 2,246.49 Advanced Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc 4,719.68 Al-Hilwani Juli 01/18/2018 101-1533-4300 personal training-Waletski 34.50 Al-Hilwani Juli 34.50 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 02/01/2018 101-0000-2008 January premium 39.78 American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus 39.78 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.01/25/2018 101-0000-2007 vision insurance 132.44 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.01/25/2018 700-0000-2007 vision insurance 24.48 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.01/25/2018 701-0000-2007 vision insurance 18.53 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.01/25/2018 720-0000-2007 vision insurance 2.99 Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc. 178.44 BATTERIES PLUS 02/01/2018 701-0000-4530 12V high rate lead 191.60 BATTERIES PLUS 191.60 BENSON KAYE L 02/01/2018 101-1539-4300 Fit for Life Instructor 560.00 BENSON KAYE L 560.00 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 01/18/2018 601-6032-4300 Minnewashta Manor St Recon-12/8/17 2,913.25 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 2,913.25 CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 01/18/2018 101-1220-4300 MN Public Safety Fire Services 830.00 CAMPION BARROW & ASSOCIATES 830.00 Carver County 01/18/2018 101-1160-4320 CarverLink internet/fiber - January 547.50 Carver County 547.50 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 101-1220-4320 November 2017 56.82 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 101-1350-4320 November 2017 1,483.99 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 101-1540-4320 November 2017 166.79 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 101-1550-4320 November 2017 177.45 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 101-1600-4320 November 2017 13.62 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 700-0000-4320 November 2017 51.95 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 700-7019-4320 November 2017 828.16 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM)Page 1 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 02/01/2018 701-0000-4320 November 2017 605.25 CCP NI MASTER TENANT 4 LLC 3,384.03 CHOICE ELECTRIC 01/25/2018 700-0000-4552 steam pipe to thaw and install heat tape 660.00 CHOICE ELECTRIC 660.00 Choice, Inc.01/18/2018 101-1220-4350 cleaning services 162.27 Choice, Inc. 162.27 CivicPlus 01/25/2018 210-0000-4300 Recover Notify Me subscriber lists 300.00 CivicPlus 01/25/2018 210-0000-4300 CivicHR applicant tracking subscription renewal 4,495.00 CivicPlus 4,795.00 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 02/01/2018 101-1220-4530 Calibration of QRAE II Monitors 125.00 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC 125.00 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 02/01/2018 101-0000-2008 January premium 116.22 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 02/01/2018 700-0000-2008 January premium 70.68 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 02/01/2018 701-0000-2008 January premium 70.68 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Co 257.58 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN.02/01/2018 400-4126-4703 add on 10 Gb LR SFP+ GBIC module 1,023.00 COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHN. 1,023.00 Delta Dental 01/18/2018 101-0000-2013 dental insurance-February 1,886.45 Delta Dental 01/18/2018 101-0000-2013 dental insurance-February cobra 30.20 Delta Dental 01/18/2018 700-0000-2013 dental insurance-February 290.96 Delta Dental 01/18/2018 701-0000-2013 dental insurance-February 260.76 Delta Dental 01/18/2018 720-0000-2013 dental insurance-February 164.83 Delta Dental 2,633.20 DOLLIFF INC. INSURANCE 01/18/2018 101-1170-4483 Crime-Policy renewal 225.00 DOLLIFF INC. INSURANCE 01/25/2018 101-1170-4483 Agency Fee-Renew policy 23,000.00 DOLLIFF INC. INSURANCE 23,225.00 FASTENAL COMPANY 01/25/2018 101-1320-4120 misc parts & supplies 105.84 FASTENAL COMPANY 01/25/2018 101-1320-4120 misc parts & supplies 86.08 FASTENAL COMPANY 01/25/2018 101-1320-4120 5/8-11x4-1/2 SSB 8p 46.90 FASTENAL COMPANY 238.82 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/25/2018 700-0000-4550 air & vac valve 644.22 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 01/25/2018 700-0000-4250 water meters 6,500.00 Ferguson Waterworks #2516 7,144.22 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 01/18/2018 400-0000-4300 2018 annual facility operator fee 50.00 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM)Page 2 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 50.00 GS DIRECT INC 01/18/2018 101-1170-4110 toner 369.60 GS DIRECT INC 369.60 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 01/25/2018 700-7019-4160 hydrofluosilicic acid/corrosion inhibitor 15,182.46 HAWKINS CHEMICAL 15,182.46 Health Strategies 01/18/2018 101-1220-4300 Return to duy exam-Larson 260.00 Health Strategies 01/18/2018 101-1220-4300 preplacement med/drug screen/mask fit 191.50 Health Strategies 01/25/2018 101-1220-4300 preplacement exam/drug screen/mask fit 288.00 Health Strategies 739.50 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 01/25/2018 400-4008-4706 Ongoing services 1,501.58 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 1,501.58 Indelco Plastics Corporation 01/25/2018 700-7019-4150 misc supplies 1,813.83 Indelco Plastics Corporation 1,813.83 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 01/18/2018 101-1170-4110 office supplies 290.98 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/01/2018 101-1170-4110 foam board 46.91 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/01/2018 101-1170-4110 office supplies/cocoa/tea 47.80 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 02/01/2018 101-1170-4110 staples/pad/pen/cover 61.25 Innovative Office Solutions LLC 446.94 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 01/18/2018 101-1250-4370 2018 IBC Significant changes 155.00 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 155.00 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 01/25/2018 101-1190-4530 kit ignitor/red paint marker 95.32 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 95.32 KEITH'S TARPS INC 01/18/2018 101-1320-4120 9' x 16' asphalt tarp 187.37 KEITH'S TARPS INC 187.37 Kubista Terence Kenneth 01/25/2018 101-1560-4300 British History class-1/10 & 1/24 100.00 Kubista Terence Kenneth 100.00 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 01/25/2018 101-1320-4120 switch 29.13 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 29.13 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.01/25/2018 101-1370-4170 propane forklift 113.22 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.01/25/2018 701-0000-4120 shank bur/bur tree 49.80 Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. 163.02 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM)Page 3 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount MESSERLI & KRAMER P.A.01/25/2018 605-0000-4300 January retainer 1,800.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER P.A. 1,800.00 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/18/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 228.91 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01/25/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 129.18 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/01/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 43.89 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 02/01/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 159.44 MN VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 561.42 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/25/2018 101-1320-4140 toggle switch 24.05 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/25/2018 700-0000-4120 oil filters/wiper blade 26.28 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/25/2018 101-1320-4140 winter blades 7.93 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 01/25/2018 101-1220-4140 atp flat pack 18.48 NAPA AUTO & TRUCK PARTS 76.74 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 02/01/2018 101-1120-4340 Connection printing 6,457.91 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 02/01/2018 101-1120-4330 Connection postage 1,840.09 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC 8,298.00 OPG-3, Inc 01/18/2018 400-4117-4703 Laserfiche annual license-support renew 13,230.00 OPG-3, Inc 13,230.00 Plant & Flanged Equipment Company 01/25/2018 700-0000-4550 misc parts & supplies 307.31 Plant & Flanged Equipment Company 307.31 Pro-Tec Design, Inc.01/18/2018 700-7047-4705 West Water Treatment Plant material 14,601.77 Pro-Tec Design, Inc. 14,601.77 Quality Flow Systems Inc 01/25/2018 701-0000-4551 LS 5 repair 1,914.00 Quality Flow Systems Inc 02/01/2018 701-0000-4300 service check of lift stations 5,860.00 Quality Flow Systems Inc 7,774.00 RBM SERVICES INC 01/18/2018 101-1190-4350 nightly janitorial-February 2,195.00 RBM SERVICES INC 01/18/2018 101-1170-4350 nightly janitorial-February 2,262.62 RBM SERVICES INC 4,457.62 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 01/18/2018 700-7047-4752 West Water Treatment Plant 999,875.00 RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP 999,875.00 SCHMIEG DEAN 01/25/2018 101-1370-4350 PW Cleaning 2,020.19 SCHMIEG DEAN 01/25/2018 700-0000-4350 PW Cleaning 252.53 SCHMIEG DEAN 01/25/2018 701-0000-4350 PW Cleaning 252.53 SCHMIEG DEAN 2,525.25 SPRINT PCS 01/18/2018 700-0000-4310 monthly charges 51.72 SPRINT PCS 01/18/2018 701-0000-4310 monthly charges 51.72 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM)Page 4 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount SPRINT PCS 103.44 STICHA GREG 01/18/2018 101-1130-4370 lunch-Suburban Rate Authority Quarterly Meeting 13.00 STICHA GREG 13.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 01/25/2018 101-1160-4300 ProofPoint Email filtering service 160.00 STRATOGUARD LLC 160.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01/25/2018 101-1550-4120 antenna 26.25 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 26.25 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1430-4040 LTD-January -4.30 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1120-4040 Life Insurance-February 30.56 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1130-4040 Life Insurance-February 16.97 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1160-4040 Life Insurance-February 10.87 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1250-4040 Life Insurance-February 45.99 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1310-4040 Life Insurance-February 42.17 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1320-4040 Life Insurance-February 46.54 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1370-4040 Life Insurance-February 18.45 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1520-4040 Life Insurance-February 15.62 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1530-4040 Life Insurance-February 6.21 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1560-4040 Life Insurance-February 6.12 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1600-4040 Life Insurance-February 9.94 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1700-4040 Life Insurance-February 2.48 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1550-4040 Life Insurance-February 43.09 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1420-4040 Life Insurance-February 32.45 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1430-4040 Life Insurance-February 2.03 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 210-0000-4040 Life Insurance-February 7.90 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 720-7201-4040 Life Insurance-February 2.39 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 720-7202-4040 Life Insurance-February 2.39 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1170-4040 Life Insurance-February 5.40 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1220-4040 Life Insurance-February 18.09 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 701-0000-4040 Life Insurance-February 33.42 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 700-0000-4040 Life Insurance-February 44.04 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 720-0000-4040 Life Insurance-February 16.37 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-0000-2011 Life Insurance-February 661.86 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 210-0000-2011 Life Insurance-February 6.00 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 700-0000-2011 Life Insurance-February 103.69 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 701-0000-2011 Life Insurance-February 103.69 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 720-0000-2011 Life Insurance-February 32.31 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1120-4040 LTD-January -64.43 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1160-4040 LTD-January -22.66 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1250-4040 LTD-January -98.44 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1310-4040 LTD-January -88.89 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1320-4040 LTD-January -103.30 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1370-4040 LTD-January -41.07 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1520-4040 LTD-January -33.07 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1530-4040 LTD-January -12.94 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1560-4040 LTD-January -12.78 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1600-4040 LTD-January -20.52 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1700-4040 LTD-January -5.13 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM)Page 5 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1550-4040 LTD-January -95.54 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1420-4040 LTD-January -68.05 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 210-0000-4040 LTD-January -16.39 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 720-7201-4040 LTD-January -5.08 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 720-7202-4040 LTD-January -5.08 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1170-4040 LTD-January -11.51 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1220-4040 LTD-January -38.07 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 701-0000-4040 LTD-January -72.76 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 700-0000-4040 LTD-January -96.38 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 720-0000-4040 LTD-January -34.59 Sun Life Financial 01/25/2018 101-1130-4040 LTD-January -35.09 Sun Life Financial 380.97 UNITED WAY 01/18/2018 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00419.01.2018 United Way 28.40 UNITED WAY 02/01/2018 101-0000-2006 PR Batch 00402.02.2018 United Way 28.40 UNITED WAY 56.80 Universal Athletic Services, Inc.02/01/2018 101-1600-4120 base anchors 134.45 Universal Athletic Services, Inc. 134.45 USA BLUE BOOK 01/25/2018 700-0000-4550 4" liquid fill gauge 384.29 USA BLUE BOOK 01/25/2018 700-0000-4550 4" liquid fill gauge 263.46 USA BLUE BOOK 01/25/2018 700-0000-4550 4" liquid fill gauge 140.99 USA BLUE BOOK 01/25/2018 700-7043-4530 SCBA wall case/emergency kit 3,445.34 USA BLUE BOOK 02/01/2018 700-0000-4530 submersible pump 963.88 USA BLUE BOOK 5,197.96 Varitech Industries Inc 01/25/2018 101-1320-4120 shaft seal 35.22 Varitech Industries Inc 35.22 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/01/2018 101-1220-4310 monthly charges 40.01 VERIZON WIRELESS 40.01 VIKING MAT COMPANY 01/25/2018 720-7025-4751 hardwood-mixed dense mats 4,200.00 VIKING MAT COMPANY 4,200.00 Water Conservation Services, Inc.01/25/2018 700-0000-4552 leak locates-Red Cedar Pt & Juniper/Lilac Lane 736.35 Water Conservation Services, Inc. 736.35 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 720-0000-4300 Local Plan Update Completion 3,533.50 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 720-7025-4752 Lk Lucy Road Culvert Replacement-November 5,555.80 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 720-7025-4752 Lk Lucy Road Culvert Replacement-December 549.80 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 9,639.10 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 01/18/2018 101-1320-4150 conbit 1,117.05 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 01/18/2018 101-1320-4150 granular borrow 224.26 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 01/18/2018 101-1320-4150 conbit 548.08 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM)Page 6 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount WM MUELLER & SONS INC 01/18/2018 101-1320-4150 conbit 835.05 WM MUELLER & SONS INC 2,724.44 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 701-0000-4300 GIS/AMS Support-November 71.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 700-0000-4300 GIS/AMS Support-November 71.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 601-6038-4752 Orchard Lane Street/Utility Reconstruct-November 20,677.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 601-6033-4752 Park Road Mill & Overlay-November 22,672.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 601-6033-4752 Park Road Mill & Overlay-August 5,456.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 601-6033-4752 Park Road Mill & Overlay-October 17,986.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 720-0000-4300 Storm Water & GPS GIS/AMS Support-November 1,001.00 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 720-0000-4300 Avienda WCA Review 4,562.50 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 01/18/2018 601-6039-4752 Lk Drive E Street Imp 18-02 - November 2,254.75 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 74,754.25 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 88.71 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/18/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 804.37 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 11.88 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 9,562.48 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 34.04 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 34.04 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 11.05 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 11.05 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 14.32 XCEL ENERGY INC 01/25/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 77.08 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 235.03 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 5,791.90 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1170-4320 electricity charges 2,054.26 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1190-4320 electricity charges 2,087.61 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1220-4320 electricity charges 1,061.42 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1370-4320 electricity charges 2,206.84 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1120-4320 electricity charges 82.26 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 700-0000-4320 electricity charges 275.86 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 701-0000-4320 electricity charges 275.85 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 700-7019-4320 electricity charges 5,045.63 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 230.11 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1540-4320 electricity charges 696.30 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 592.28 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1550-4320 electricity charges 246.18 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1600-4320 electricity charges 48.10 XCEL ENERGY INC 02/01/2018 101-1350-4320 electricity charges 22,388.65 XCEL ENERGY INC 53,967.30 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 02/01/2018 101-1320-4120 medical supplies 30.44 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 02/01/2018 101-1370-4120 medical supplies 30.44 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 02/01/2018 101-1550-4120 medical supplies 30.44 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 02/01/2018 700-0000-4120 medical supplies 30.43 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 121.75 ZIEGLER INC 02/01/2018 700-0000-4510 radiator 3,000.00 ZIEGLER INC 02/01/2018 700-0000-4530 radiator 2,386.59 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM)Page 7 of 8 Name Check Da Account Description Amount ZIEGLER INC 5,386.59 1,285,681.61 Accounts Payable - Check Detail-ACH (02/01/2018 - 9:25 AM)Page 8 of 8 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Monday, February 12, 2018 Subject Letter from Mediacom dated January 29, 2018 Section CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION Item No: K.5. Prepared By Kim Meuwissen, Office Manager File No: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Mediacom dated January 29, 2018