The URL can be used to link to this page

CC Packet 2008 02 11AGENDA CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2008 CHANHASSEN MUNICIPAL BUIL DING, 7700 MARKET BOULEVARD 5:30 P.M. - CITY COUNCIL WORK SE SSION, FOUNTAIN CONFERENCE ROOM Note: If the City Council does not complete th e work session items in the time allotted, the remaining items will be considered after the regular agenda. A. Discuss City Council Applicants. B. Discussion of City Code Amendments. 7:00 P.M. – REGULAR MEETI NG, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER (Pledge of Allegiance) PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS CONSENT AGENDA All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the city council and will be considered as one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. City council action is based on the staff recommendation for each item. Refer to the council packet for each staff report. 1. a. Approval of Minutes: - City Council Work Session Minutes dated January 28, 2008 - City Council Summary Minutes dated January 28, 2008 - City Council Verbatim Minutes dated January 28, 2008 Receive Commission Minutes: - Planning Commission Summary Minutes dated January 15, 2008. - Planning Commission Verbatim Minutes dated January 15, 2008. - Park & Recreation Commission Summary Minutes dated January 22, 2008 b. Approve Vacant Land Purchase Agreement for Chanhassen Estates Park and Well #13 Improvements, Project No. 08-05 c. Approval of Temporary On-Sale Liquor License, Harvest Festival, St. Hubert Catholic Community. d. Approve Condemnation Resolution for Lyman Boulevard Improvements, Project 06-03. 1 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC HEARINGS - None UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW BUSINESS 2. BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP/SNAP FITNESS: Request for Site Plan Approval for a 50,000 square-foot office/warehouse building; Located at 2411 Galpin Court (Lot 1, Block 2, Chanhassen West Business Park). Applicant: Eden Trace Corporation. 3. Consider Approval of Distribution of MS-4 Permit Non-Degradation Plan. 4. Appointment to City Council. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS CORRESPONDENCE PACKET ADJOURNMENT A copy of the staff report and supporting documentation being sent to the city council will be available after 2:00 p.m. on Thursday. Please contact city hall at 952-227-1100 to verify that your item has not been deleted from the agenda any time after 2:00 p.m. on Thursday. GUIDELINES FOR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Welcome to the Chanhassen City Council Meeting. In the interest of open communications, the Chanhassen City Council wishes to provide an opportunity for the public to address the City Council. That opportunity is provided at every regular City Council meeting during Visitor Presentations. 1. Anyone indicating a desire to sp eak during Visitor Presentations w ill be acknowledged by the Mayor. When called upon to speak, state your name, address, and topic. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council as a whole, not to any specific member(s) or to any person who is not a member of the City Council. 2. If there are a number of individuals present to speak on the same topic, please designate a spokesperson that can summarize the issue. 3. Limit your comments to five minutes. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the Mayor. If you have written comments, provi de a copy to the Council. 4. During Visitor Presentations, the Council and staff liste n to comments and will not engage in discussion. Council members or the City Manager may ask questi ons of you in order to gain a thorough understanding 2 of your concern, suggestion or request. 5. Please be aware that disrespectful comments or comments of a personal nature, directed at an individual either by name or inference, will not be allowed. Personnel concerns should be directed to the City Manager. Members of the City Council and some staff members may gather at Houlihan’s Restaurant & Bar, 530 Pond Promenade in Chanhassen immediately after the meeting for a purely social event. All members of the public are welcome. 3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site www ci chanhassen mn us A MEMORANDUM TO Mayor City Council FROM Todd Gerhardt City Manager 11 1 D February 11 2008 DATE SUBJ Discuss City Council Applicants On Thursday February 7th the City Council interviewed six applicants for the vacant City Council seat At tonight s work session the Council should evaluate each applicant and determine who should be appointed to Councilman Peterson s unexpired term ATTACHMENT 1 AppIications Resumes 2 Mayor City Council Responsibilies The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 4 APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILOR Date January 21 2008 City o Cltanltassen 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Cltanltassen MN 553RECEIVED Name Jerry A McDonald JAN 2 3 2008 Address 88 Olympic Circle CITY OF CHANHASSEN No of Years in Chanhassen 23 Home Phone 952 474 3609 Work Pltone 952253 1406 Hif ltest Level of Education Attained Plus Def rees if anv College EET MBA and JD Emplovment Historv State position emplover and brief description of duties PRIVATE PRACTICE A TIORNEY Chanhassen MN General Practice Attorney November 2002 to Present Practicing in the areas of Business Contracts Criminal Estate Planning Family and Real Estate VIDEO UPDATE St Paul MN Business Manager August 1997 to July 1999 Store operations including cash management employee staffmg and scheduling customer service and satisfaction OUAD CITY BUILDER S SUPPLY Bettendorf IA General Manager September 1995 to August 1996 Company operations cash management sales planning and customer service GEORGE S MAY INTERNATIONAL COMPANY Chicago IL Project Director June 1995 to September 1995 Directed team of Staff Executives to defme scope and schedule of services for individual clients Responsible for client satisfaction and quality assurance Staff Executive March 1995 to June 1995 Provided Business Management Consulting Services to clients including fmancial analysis and long term planning NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITIES SERVICES Minneapolis MN Installation Manager October 1993 to February 1995 Supervised and scheduled security system installation for both commercial and residential buildings in a five state area AETRIUM INC North St Paul MN Engineering and Program Manager July 1991 to July 1993 Managed the engineering design group electrical mechanical and software developed product requirements schedules and budgets for cost proposals GENERAL ELECTRIC Syracuse NY Senior Consulting Systems Engineer February 1989 to December 1990 Engineering Program Manager responsible for engineering schedules cost estimates staffing and customer review of program requirements schedules and budgets Page 1 of 2 5 APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILOR Date January 21 2008 Activities and Affiliations ancIude elective offices honors and reco1 nitions received if anv Chanhassen Rotary Club Honorable Order of Kentucliy Colonels Minnesota Bar Association First District Bar Association Reasons for Seekin1 this Position As a current member of the Planning Commission I believe that I have unique insight into the process of city government I have participated in several public meetings listening to the perspectives presented by the city staff developers and the public and then applying the city codes and regulations with the members of the Planning Commission to formulate recommendations to assist City Council with its review deliberations and decisions of planning case request I would like the opportunity to follow through on the plan as developed and help with its implementation Svecific Qualifications for the Position Current member of the Planning Commission Chairman since 2006 I was actively involved with the 2008 Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan from participating in the Question Answer sessions the Public Meeting sessions and the Comment and Suggestions sessions with city staff I have experience working with city staff and city council I also have a business background and understand how budgets are created and how budgets are reviewed I am currently the Managing Partner at my law firm and interact daily with service providers court administrators clients and opposing counsel on a wide variety of issues Page 2 of 2 6 letter of Interest Date 1 29 2G08 This letter is to acknowledge that I am expressing interest in filling the final year of the Chanhassen City Council position formerly occupied by Mr Craig Peterson the indicated position having been vacated due to Craig s appointment to the Metropolitan Council in District 4 John Kunitz 6441 Bretton Way Chanhassen Mn REceIVED JAN 2 9 2008 CITY OF CHNJHASSEN 7 APPLICATION FOR CllANHASSEN CITY COUNCILOR Dafe I Z9 Z008 City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN55317 Home Phone Work Phone John William Kunitz 6441 Bretton Way Chanhassen MN 55317 9524742553 651 6872598 Name Address No of Years in Chanhassen 19 My wife and I have been residents of Chanhassen since 1989 and have 2 children o Son Daniel age 24 is an Eagle Scout and attends the University of Minnesota o Daughter Meredith age 20 attends St Olaf College recipient of a Chanhassen Rotary Club Scholarship Highest Level of Education Attained PIllY Degrees if any BA Concordia College Moorhead Minnesota Major Economics and History Employment History State position employer andhriiif description of Duties 1975 1977 Program Director Broadcast Announcer KWKY radio Des Moines Iowa 1978 1979 Manager Burger King Ano Minnesota 1980 Present Senior Project Manager Unisys Corporation Eagan Minnesota Duties Manage the teclmical activities human resouJ ces budgets and schedules of several technical computer projects at Unisys Corporation I am associated with the Unisys division for world wide transportation specializing in computer projects for airline passenger services airport services and realtime tele communications My duties are to manage employees concerned with the design development and support of airline airport software products or technologies I establish work objectives work plans schedules and cost analysis for development programs I directly manage four subordinate managers for each of the projects for which I have responsibilit with overall responsibility for a professional technical team of thirty five I am also involved in managing the multi million dollar Unisystransportationsupport budget In addition I am a representative from my company to the International Air Transport Association which is a subgroup of the United Nations transportation area These technical committees design and publish new technical standards that control the operations of airlines and airports worldwide Activities and Affiliations Include elective offices honors and recognitions received if any President ofKap pa Theta Phi Society Concordia College 2 years assistant coach Chanhassen soccer league 11 years BSA Boy Scouts of America assistant scoutmaster and treasurer 20 years member and current chair of the International Air Transport Association AT A Passenger Services Airports committee 8 2 years Secretary of the IA T A XML teChnical message l ommittee 20 years member of the Inter Airline Through Check in IA TCn committee Member of Mensa M mbcr of Mt Calvary Church and lay r cr and usher Rnaura furS kilrg tfriy PUYitiun Chanhassen has come a long way since I moved here 19 years ago The community has served my family wen over the years In that time Chanhassen has gone from a small town to a major urban center with the population doubling since 990 The current city administration has done an excellent job of It ading this dramatic change with the new library the new water treatment plant expansion of tbe trail system and close attention to the fiscal responsibilities of city government I would like to use my ability to work within committees my experience as a business manager working with budgets and supervising projects around the world to help keep the 94 percent favorable quality of life rating given by the residents of the city and help this city to remain a Suburban Standout as it was recognized recently by the Minneapolis Star and Tribune Several is mes of importance are coming to the table this year the dramatic development as a result of Highway 212 being extended through Char basscn the opening ofChanbassen High School by 2009 the discussion around the opening of a new regional mall the continuing effort to keep a balanced budget in an uncertain economy Challenges and change will continue This year is a very important time when the city s ten year comprehensive plan takes shape I fecI that being a member of a c ommunity also means to be a contributing member of that community I feel that I have the desire and the skills to contribute to the objectives of the Chanhassen City Council I feel this is a great opportunity to become involved in a significant manner and to help determine Chanhassen s future direction Specific f211t1lifictdlons for the Position Experience with budget t mt a small hmine manager at Burger King Experience as the manager of a multi national professional team in a large corporation with a multi million dollar bmtget Experience working effectively within a committee structure in international airline organJzations Experience with community and diversity having lived and worked in 32 countries over the past 25 years Experience in looking f t W d and planning for the future with my involvement in the malntenance ofworid wlde computer projects 9 Gary Foster 710 Carver Beach Road Chanhassen MN 55317 952 474 1366 City Hall 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Dear City of Chanhassen Please consider my application for Council member for the City of Chanhassen to replace Craig Peterson who is moving on to serve on the Metropolitan Council Although new to Chanhassen I bring a wealth of professional and personal experience and a fresh point of view on the issues that face our community I believe every citizen has a duty to participate in government service for some period of time My goal on the Council is to help create a safe and welcoming environment one that people from all over will want to move to set up their businesses and participate in Chanhassen is a great place to live I would like to do my part to help make it even better Thank you for considering my application Yours very truly RECEIVED JAN 0 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 10 APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILOR Date 1 28 2008 City ofChanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Name Gary Foster Address 710 Carver Beach Road Chanhassen MN 55317 Home Phone 952 474 1366 Work Phone 952 380 2200 No of Years in Chanhassen 5 Highest Level of Education Attained Plus Degrees if any See attached resume Employment History State position employer and brief description of duties See attached resume Activities and Affiliations Include elective offices honors and recognitions received if any See attached resume Reasons for Seeking this Position See attached resume Specific Qualifications for the Position See attached resume A1 SIGNATURE 11 Gary Foster 710 Carver Beach Road Chanhassen MN 55317 Home Phone 952 474 1366 Work Phone 952 380 2200 Number of Years in Chanhassen Owned a home here since 2003 Education Reynolds High School Winston Salem N C graduated in 1972 Forsyth Technical College Winston Salem N C and Gwinnett County Technical College Atlanta Georgia coursework in carpentry elect onics residential electrical wiring computer programming 1972 1988 Employment History Employee March 2003 present Eckankar Software analyst and programmer Self employed Computer Consultant September 1994 November 2001 Consultant March 2000 November 2001 Healthcare Compensation Strategies Assisted in converting their primary business application from a LAN based system to a client server application Consultant October 1999 February 2000 C H Robinson Inc a third party logistics vendor with nearly three billion dollars a year in sales Helped improve their web based applications Project Manager February 1996 October 1999 Starkey Laboratories Inc Put together a programming team to develop medical office management software for the hearing industry that included insurance billing POS appointment scheduling and more A three million dollar re engineering effort Consultant September 1994 February 1996 Clinical Programs Department of Guidant Corp Developed validated database applications used for collecting data from clinical trials to get Food and Drug Administration approval for implantable cardiac devices Member of the team that developed the Clinical Department s software development process coding standards and peer review procedures Senior Software Engineer Insurance Testing Corporation December 1990 September 1994 Worked directly with ITC department heads state personnel and lTC s internal and external users to design and implement the systems needed to meet the business objectives of a rapidly growing company 12 Lead analyst for the PC systems group Eastern Electric Inc March 1987 September 1990 Designed and coded accounting applications Self employed Consultant November 1985 March 1987 Worked with businesses to implement PC accounting systems Self employed General Contractor Residential and Light Commercial Construction April 1972 November 1982 Participated in all phases of building and remodeling Career Highlights Corporate re engineering I ve led the reengineering of mission critical software systems for three companies since 1987 and participated in others Insurance industry Helped develop medical practice insurance billing Familiar with the HCFA 1500 form data and its variants used by different companies and also Canadian insurance billing Medical Worked in the clinical department of a Class 3 medical device company Experienced with FDA regulated software development Also managed the development of a comprehensive medical office management application Accounting Over twenty years of business programming and analysis Budgets estimating job cost inventory business to business communication Activities and Affiliations Membership chair for the Judo Minnesota Inc state governing body for U S Olympic Judo Board of Directors 2003 present President Minnesota Eckankar Board of Trustees 1996 2005 Prepared local and state church budgets and presented to Board advised local groups President Georgia Eckankar Board of Trustees 1987 1990 Prepared local and state church budgets and presented to Board advised local groups Twice represented Starkey Labs one of the largest hearing aid manufacturers in the world in technical negotiations in Copenhagen Denmark with HIMSA a Danish standards organization that certifies hearing industry software as well as other Danish business partners Member of a city arbitration board that resolved a dispute between a building owner and contractor in Winston Salem N C 1980 13 Reasons for Seeking This Position I believe every citizen has a duty to participate in government service for some period of time I want to help make Chanhassen a place that people from all over will want to move to set up their businesses and participate in our thriving community Chanhassen is a great place to live and I would like to do my part to help make it even better Specific Qualifications for the Position I have been self employed much of my working life and understand how important it is to have balanced sensible financial planning and good partnership with other businesses I have a deep understanding of residential and light commercial construction and have worked with city building departments in three states I ve successfully led teams through the process of working through competing interests 14 APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILOR RECEIVED Date January 28 2008 City ofChanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P O BJArlf qr sen MN 55317 Name Bruce A Kraft CITY OF CHA IASGEN Address 7094 Northwood Court Chanhassen MN 55317 Home Phone 952 470 6068 Work Phone 651 205 0876 No of Years in Chanhassen 6 vears 9 months Highest Level of Education Attained Plus Degrees if any MBA Marquette University BBA Iowa State University Employment History State position employer and brief description of duties I am a Senior level financial leader with diverse career experience in General Electric and US Bancorp that spans financial services manufacturing and technology lines of business I possess extensive management and organizational leadership skills and experience in finance accounting financial planning and analysis strategic planning investment analysis and business development Employment historv and positions held US Bancorp 0 2000 Present GE Capital 0 1996 7 2000 Senior Vice President Vice President Finance Director Vice President Marketing Finance and varied Finance Manager roles in Business Development Productivity and Asset Management GE Information Systems 8 94 7 96 Finance Manager Engineering and Internet Development GE Medical Systems 10 91 8 94 Senior Financial Analyst Service Division GE Plastics 6 89 10 91 Financial Analyst Manufacturing Activities and Affiliations Include elective offices honors and recognition received if any Community Involvement Parent member of the 2007 School District 112 Curriculum Design Team Coach for Chanhassen and Chaska Youth Basketball and Baseball Athletic Programs Member ofMt Calvary Lutheran Church Finance Committee US Bancorp United Way Leadership Committee Member Recipient of the T R Martin Award for Excellence in Graduate Education Marquette Member of Beta Gamma Sigma International Honor Society Reasons for Seeking this Position Mv wife Jerilyn and our three children Allison 17 Nathan 14 and Clarissa 10 moved to Chanhassen in April 2001 from the far Northwest suburbs of Chicago Having moved seven times in a 13 year period we see Chanhassen as our permanent home and are looking forward to spending many years to come living in this great community I would like to ioin the Chanhassen City Council so that I may give back to the community share my talents and assist the Council in keeping Chanhassen a progressive desirable and safe place for families to live and companies to do business In addition as we continue to benefit from rapid growth and expansion it will be my personal goal to ensure that all opportunities and proposals are given thorough consideration and support provided to those that are in the best interests of our citizens Thank you for your time and consideration Specific Qualifications for the Position Leadership and team building skills financial acumen organizational skills energy and creativity Honors and Recognition d SIGNATURE 15 City of Chanhassen RECEIVED JAN 3 1 2008 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Letter of interest Chanhassen City Councilor I am interested in taking the recently vac ated city councilor position My resume is attached for a more detailed description of my experiences qualifications and history From the experiences of my many moves throughout my career and during my 9 years in the city of Chanhassen I can really appreciate the excellent leadership and high standards this city represents and has maintained for its citizens This only comes with visionary leadership that is also closely involved and understands what is needed by the community and its citizens The reason I am seeking this position is to continue this tradition of excellent leadership further citizen participation in local government and continue to make Chanhassen the great city it is and has been recognized for over the years My key area of interest is to maintain the proper balance between development the citizens and community and the environment My career in the private sector has given me the many experiences needed to excel in this position I have been involved with business development as a technology leader in the companies I have been employed by including Dow Chemical Cargill and now Nature Works LLC I have worked with local governments in India Japan Indonesia Thailand and China trying to find the best fit for the businesses and technologies I represented Through these experiences I have seen the negative impact that happens when government leadership does not think of the community first unemployment corruption pollution crime and I have also seen the positive things that happen when a government does well high levels of employment businesses wanting to invest low environmental impact safety high standards of living and many more Along with opportunities to work with government organizations I have had many leadership positions throughout my career which have taught me how to manage responsibilities and goals and priorities toward an overall objective These opportunities have resulted in many different successes in my career but the one that I believe really demonstrates it is when Cargill approached Dow Chemical and said they have a technology to produce a biodegradable plastic from com Dow s leadership out of the 45 000 people in the company picked me to go represent Dow in this new to the world business opportunity I was the technology leader as Dowand Cargill worked to make this wonderful new product a reality It has grown from that initial meeting between these two companies to a multi million dollar sustainable business for Cargill and I have been instrumental to the success this business has experienced I have taken an active role in the Chanhassen government and community I participated in the Lotus Lake No Wake Committee I am president of the Lotus Lake Clean Water Organization Vice President of the Lotus lake HomeOwners Association and I have been recently appointed to the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Citizen Advisory committee All these organizations are attempting to improve the current standards through community and government involvement working together for the continuous improvements wanted by the citizens and community of Chanhassen If appointed to the vacancy I know I will be a positive influence for the city to continue its leadership among cities setting the example of how to best meet community needs through the proper balance of development citizens and community needs and the environment Regards U Steven A Donen 16 STEVEN ALAN DONEN 7341 Frontier Trail Chanhassen Minnesota 55317 952 974 9163 c sdonen@yahoo com SUMMARY Visionary and talented executive with experience leading manufacturing operations engineering and technology organizations in the United States and abroad Recognized expert in technology development plant operations and engineering for new and large scale bio chemical and plastics manufacturing Have spend career leading new to the world and major step change improvements in manufacturing processes Experienced in successfully implementing new process technologies from piloting through to world scale manufacturing Successful senior executive with proven ability to drive and improve corporate revenues through broad based competencies in Bio Chemical and Plastics Process Technologies Manufacturing excellence Process Development Environmental Impact Planning Engineering and Project Management Supply Chain ContinuouslBreakthrough Process and Cost Health and Safety Improvements Budgeting and Planning CAREER EXPERIENCE NATUREWORKS LLC PRE 2005 NAMED CARGILL Dow LLC Minneapolis Minnesota 2000 Present Director of Manufacturing Technology and Engineering Responsible for the Manufacturing Technology deployed at Cargill Dow LLC Responsibilities include leading the Manufacturing Technology and Engineering organization in developing building and starting up the new NatureWorks PLA plants along with continuous improvements in capacity costs reliability quality environment health and safety Successfully led the engineering research and development organizations through the development design construction and startup of the worlds first world scale polymer plant that makes plastic from corn called Polylactide PLA and the development design and startup of the worlds largest Lactic Acid Fermentation facility more than tripling the worlds supply of Lactic Acid Continue to lead these organizations through the tripling of the original capacity and reducing costs by 50 Leading the organization through the challenges of both the initial fermentation development and the 2nd generation improved fermentation microbial development and scale up to world scale implementation which will reduce operating costs by 25 Using a process called Asset Utilization continued the identification and implementation of process improvements reducing the costs by over 50 since startup Led the continued efforts between Cargill Dow and the Nebraska Environment organization NDEQ to work through the environmental permits for this new process technology As we have operated the new facility we have identified issues with our original permits and are currently in the process of identifying and implementing modifications to meet Nebraska requirements THE Dow CHEMICAL COMPANY Midland Michigan 1979 2000 Promoted continually through a series of important and escalating projects and management responsibilities for the Worlds largest US chemical company Dow is the world leader in the production of plastics chemicals hydrocarbons herbicides and pesticides Dow specializes in chlorine caustic ethylene polyethylene epoxies and polystyrene which are used to process chemicals and treat water and petroleum Director of Manufacturing Engineering and Process Development Cargill Dow UC 1998 2000 Selected as a key member of the leadership team of a new joint venture between Dow Chemical and Cargill that is commercializing a revolutionary new plastic from corn Polylactide PLA Responsible for Cargill Dow Polymers manufacturing semi works facility engineering and process development along with the design and construction of the first world scale PLA manufacturing plant Working with Cargill Dow s commercial and R D teams manufacturing was able to supply development customers with products to assess market needs and value and to determine product performance requirements Used feedback from developmental customers to design and begin construction of the first world scale PLA production facility Successfully completed the process defInition engineering for the first of its kind world scale PLA plant Efforts in plant and product design were critical to earning the funding of 300 million necessary to move the venture from developmental stage to commercialization 1 17 STEVEN ALAN DONEN 7341 Frontier Trail Chanhassen Minnesota 55317 612 974 9163 c sdonen@yahoo com Developed and led the manufacturing organization for the PLA semi works facility through defming the characteristics and roles of the organization recruiting top talent developing two year business objectives and maintaining focus on achievement of those objectives Managed the development of the new PLA technology through identification of technology gaps in cost product consistency and performance resulting in a PLA manufacturing process with competitive costs to other hydrocarbon based polymers Doubled the capacity of the plant and improved the quality of products through the implementation of new or improved unit operations including the conversion from batch to continuous operations Global Technology Manager for Polystyrene Business Midland Michigan 1996 1998 Led the technology team which was responsible for both developing the long term technology strategies identify new technology opportunities for the polystyrene business along with solving any technology equipment related plant problems Worked with the plants and individuals to fmd and implement new technologies for future needs Traveled worldwide to solve problems and complete technology reviews Developed approved and implemented global budgets including facility capacity maintenance and quality improvement goals Led the Dow Chemical manufacturing due diligence efforts of a new process owned and developed by Cargill to produce a plastic Polylactide PLA from corn Along with the commercial organization used Dow s develop and commercial technology process D CT in combination with the manufacturing due diligence to develop the recommendations reviewed with the CEO of the Dow Chemical company The recommendations resulted in a Joint Venture between Cargill and Dow Chemical called Cargill Dow LLC Through my leadership Cargill Dow is a company with a manufacturing process capable of producing PLA plastic at over 300 MM lbs yr at competitive costs with oil based plastics and as sales continue to grow the company is on its way to being a successful addition to both Cargill and The Dow Chemical Company businesses Led the global technology improvement team that consisted of engineers located at the central technology center in Midland Michigan and at each plant to implement technology strategies using the most effect technologies as defmed by the global business strategy The improvement team consisted of 7 process engineering and subject manner experts and 18 engineers located at each ofDow s polystyrene locations across the globe Spearheaded the design and implementation of the business IP strategy that protected the most important innovations from competitors while profitably licensing other processes without risking the position as the industry leader in polystyrene Championed development and implemented a vision to decrease both the capital requirements and manufacturing costs while providing product quality to meet the customers needs resulting in a 20 increase in existing plant capacity 12 improvement in plant reliability and 30 increase in new plant capacity Achieved reduction in costs through mechanical reliability improvements modeling automated process control and improved design of various unit operations Instrumental in the introduction of technologies that led to two new global products one product improved the aesthetics and product strength at a lower price than competitors did and another product improved the strength ofa very brittle product without sacrificing product clarity Polystyrene Plant Superintendent Midland Michigan 1994 1996 Fully responsible for personnel and plant operations that included a 100 million annual budget Provided leadership and support through coaching and guidance of teams and individuals Along with operations responsibilities had responsibilities for the supply chain for all the Midland Michigan based Styrene Polymer facilities shipping over 2 Billion Ibs yr globally One of my direct report lead the implementation of SAP in the Midland polystyrene facilities Structured an effective Environmental Health and Safety EH S program that achieved corporate goals and complied with regulatory and permit requirements while utilizing internal self audits and inviting external analysis One of my direct reports was the building facilities manager for 433 building in Midland Michigan The building is Dow s largest single building with over 300 occupants including offices labs and pilot facilities with over 400 000 sq ft of space Devised and implemented an integrated quality assurance quality control program that improved fmish product quality ratings by reducing variations producing quality products and meeting customer expectations 2 18 STEVEN ALAN DONEN 7341 Frontier Trail Chanhassen Minnesota 55317 612 974 9163 c sdonen@yahoo com Through modeling and advanced process control techniques set the new world capacity standard for any Dow Chemical polystyrene plant by increasing the capacity by 20 Project Manager Plant of the Year 2000 Midland Michigan 1993 1994 Led the definition of the project to create the polystyrene manufacturing processes and organization of the future year 2000 by working with commercial R D EH S quality and manufacturing divisions around the world Assisted in implementing the visions that achieved globally a 50 reduction in operating costs and a 30 increase in capacity without sacrificing the high quality of the product Identified and developed improved asset utilization opportunities on a capital spending budget of 100 million and an expense budget of less than 5 million Technology Superintendent Pacific Area Hong Kong 1989 1993 Researched opportunities to expand manufacturing and operations presence throughout Asia Completed due diligence efforts in India Japan Thailand and Indonesia The India and Japan analysis resulted in recommendations to not pursue while Thailand and Indonesia resulted in Dow starting Joint Ventures and investing in new manufacturing plants Managed the technology implementation for three new plant startups in Hong Kong Thailand and Indonesia total capital spending on these new facilities was over 180 MM Oversaw capital spending to upgrade the existing facilities to improve plant reliability product quality and capacity with a capital budget greater than 60 million per year Assistant Superintendent Caustic and Brine Plants Pitts burg California 1986 1989 Managed the day to day operations for the plant including people SUperviSion process improvements maintenance budgeting goal setting quality and environmental health and safety for the facility Increased capacity of a 50 year old facility by 20 through improvements in maintenance reliability and good operating discipline techniques Production Supervisor Torrance California 1984 1986 Managed the day to day operations for two polystyrene plants including people supervision maintenance and quality Project Manager Torrance California 1983 1984 Oversaw the installation of new reactor technology state of the art process control operations and control facilities Senior Production Engineer Research Engineer Torrance California 1981 1983 Coordinated troubleshooting and process improvement projects along with maintenance planning Senior Production Engineer Research Engineer Torrance California 1979 1981 Designed and engineered the construction and startup of a polystyrene mini plant Implemented two new ABS products that improved the toughness of resins Developed a new molecular weight control additive for polystyrene PROFESSIONAL TRAINING Creating High Performance Teams Management Essentials Effective Presentations Continuous Improvement Investing in People Tennessee Associates Statistical Analysis Burner management Performance Management and Managing Interpersonal Relations EDUCATION BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING Washington State University GPA 3 79 Magna Cum Laude 1979 Pullman Washington 3 19 STEVEN ALAN DONEN 7341 Frontier Trail Chanhassen Minnesota 55317 612 974 9163 c sdonen@yahoo com V OLUNTEERlPROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District citizen advisory committee President of Lotus Lake Clean Water Organization Vice President of Louts Lake Home Owners Association President of Lotus Lake Water Ski Club Member of American Institute of Chemical Engineers Member of American Water Ski Association and a qualified Scorer and Assistant Judge PERSONAL DATA FAMILY Married to Carol K Donen Two children Adrienne 21 senior at University of Wisconsin Madison Heather 19 freshman at University of Wisconsin Madison Member of Temple Beth Shalom Carol is on board of Directors over 700 families and works at Datacard in Minnetonka Minnesota HOBBIES Competitive Water Skiing Snow Skiing Snow Mobiling Running and summer water sports 4 20 APPLICATION FOR CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCILOR January 31 2008 Name Ladd Conrad Address 6625 Horseshoe Curve Chanhassen MN 55317 Home Phone Work Phone 952 474 9563 612 331 2502 Number of years in Chanhassen 35 Highest education attained MBA Employment history Owner of MTM Advertising supporting retail construction hospitality and non profit companies We provide advertising graphic design PR research website and media buying services Activitiesl Affi Iiations Tourism Governor s Council on Tourism Twin Cities Tourism Board President 3 years Founder TC Attractions Association Maple Leaf Award 2007 Chanhassen Rotary Distinguished Citizen Award Former youth coach Reason for seeking position On a short term basis fill in the gap left by Craig with my many years of experience holding public hearings knowledge of Chanhassen knowledge of our business community Specific qualifications 22 years in Chanhassen s Planning Commission served as Chair 3 comprehensive plan reviews Involvement with many city committees water quality SWMP business involvement with Southwest Transit Carver County Community Development Agency local and regional healthcare providers and connections with local busin s co UP 21 City of Chanhassen Mayor and City Council Responsibilities 1 Financial Acumen Without question serving as a Council member in a City of this size generally requires some sort of minimal financial acumen i e budgeting review of audits debt analysis and bond sales 2 Organizational ParticipationlManagement Serving as a Council member especially in a City of our size is a position of organizational leadership This is not to say that those who have not been part of an organization cannot serve effectively as Council members however possessing an understanding of the dynamics of an organization as opposed to a self proprietorship or a partnership does bring with it some advantages The development of policies ordinances by the Council as a whole 3 Public Interaction Communication Much of what we do here involves communication and services delivery Understanding the thoughts and actions of a candidate within these areas might be beneficial to you 4 Planning Land Use Development In any city including those that are not facing the same development pressures we face here this category is critical In our community we face daily pressures upon the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan miscellaneous Watershed Plans and the City Zoning Code The ability to understand and grasp issues of land use law development issues and strategic long term planning will continue to be important 5 Optional Plan B Form of Government Optional Plan B embodies the council manager plan of government Under Plan B the elected city council consists of a mayor and four council members All policy and legislative decisions are the responsibility of the council The council delegates the administrative duties to a city manager The manager is accountable to the council for the effective administration of city business in accordance with council decisions These categories are not meant to be exclusive of any others I have simply tried to categorize to the best of my ability areas in which Council members operate I would also recommend that you visit the League of Minnesota Cities web site www 1mnc org and click on Welcome Newly Elected Officials I hope you find this of assistance g admin tg council vacancy mayor and city council responsibilities doc 22 City Council Interviews Thursday February 7 2008 5 00 p m Fountain Conference Room 7700 Market Boulevard 5 00 5 30 p m Jerry McDonald 5 30 6 00 p m John Kunitz 6 00 6 15 p m Dinner Break 6 15 6 45 p m Gary Foster 6 45 7 15 p m Bruce Kraft 7 15 7 45 p m Steven Donen 7 45 8 15 p m Ladd Conrad 23 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site www ci chanhassen mn us B MEMORANDUM TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager FROM Angie Auseth Planner I DA TE t February 11 2008 SUBJ City Code Issue Paper BACKGROUND In anticipation of the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan staff is preparing an update of the City Code to coincide with its adoption Staff has reviewed the City Code and come up with issues shortfalls and general updates and recognizes pertinent additions that are warranted by the adoption of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Due to thenumber of changes staff will be presenting them in sections over the next few work sessions In some cases staff has offered a potential change to a specific section as a general update or known issue Staff is requesting input and guidance with regard to the identified issues before we proceed with a recommendation Overall staff is requesting feedback for the proposed code updates Based on that feedback code amendments and recommendations will follow at a later date ANA YLSIS See attached section of the city code DIRECTION The Planning Staff is looking to the City Council for feedback with regard to the attached City Code issues ATTACHMENT 1 Chapter 20 Suggested Updates 2 Permitted Uses in Commercial Districts Matrix 3 CBD BG Use Matrix g plan aa code revision 2008 code update work session memo doc The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 24 CHAPTER 20 Z0NING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1 ISSUE The PUD specifically states that the PUD shall be reviewed simultaneously with Chapter 18 and Chapter 20 Article II Division 6 Articles V VI and VII However it does not specifically state the remaining underlying Chanhassen City Code standards shall apply when an issue is not specifically addressed in the PUD Development Contract i e dimensional letters for signage In such case if the individual PUD agreement does not specifically call out these ordinances they cannot be strictly enforced Staff suggests adding a subsection within the Planned Unit Development District that will encompass all underlying zoning ordinances to prevail unless other wise addressed in the PUD agreement PROPOSED CHANGE Amend Section 20 504 by adding subsection d as shown below Sec 20 504 Coordination with other zoning regulations a Subdivision review under Chapter 18 shall be carried out simultaneously with the review of a PUD The plans required under this chapter shall be submitted in addition to or in a form which will satisfy the requirements of chapter 18 for the preliminary and final plat b Site plan review under article II division 6 of this chapter shall be carried out for each nonsingle family or duplex principal structure that is proposed c PUD plans shall be coordinated with and in compliance with provisions of articles V VI and VII of this chapter d In the event the PUD zoning ordinance or agreement is silent on an issue the underlying Chanhassen City Code standards shall prevail 2 ISSUE There are issues with the mandatory setback and buffer requirements in the Planned Unit Development section of the City Code The buffer requirements are overly restrictive and prevent implementation of other planning goals e g street front retail Staff proposes that these setback standards be developed in conjunction with the design and approval of each project rather than a one size fits all standard When the PUD standards were originally developed the City did not have a specific buffer yard ordinance In 1996 the City adopted specific buffer yard requirements Sec 20 501 Intent 1 25 Planned unit developments offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most nomzal zoning district standards The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses internal transfers of density construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs In exchange for this enhanced flexibility the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other more standard zoning districts Emphasis added The above paragraph discusses the enhanced flexibility however the imposition of the strict standards is contradictory to the overall intent of the PUD In order to maintain a basis for negotiation for setback requirements staff proposes reducing the minimum setback standards to allow for more flexibility Staff will be referencing the buffer yard requirements to determine the minimum setback requirments within a PUD The minimum setback requirement is dependant on the adjacent use Draft table PUD Setback Requirements Proposed Development Q Low Medium Hi2h Office Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Parks rI J J Low None 20 30 30 30 40 40 20 0 Medium None 10 20 20 30 40 40 20 t a High None 10 10 20 30 40 40 20 Office None 20 20 10 20 20 20 20 Mixed Use None 30 30 20 20 20 20 30 Q Commercial None 30 40 20 20 10 20 30 t a S Industrial None 10 30 20 20 20 20 30 Parks None 30 10 20 30 30 30 10 Roads None 20 20 20 20 20 30 20 Finally staff would provide a basis or criteria for the City to either increase the required setbacks or reduce the setbacks in order to implement community goals e g affordable housing street front retail enhanced public spaces etc Sec 20 505 Required General Standards f The setback for all buildings within a PUD from any abutting street line shall be 30 feet for local streets and 50 feet from railroad lines or collector or arterial streets as designated in the comprehensive plan except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building up to a maximum of 100 feet The setback for all buildings from exterior PUD lot lines not abutting a public street shall be 30 feet except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building up to a maximum of 100 feet Building setbacks from internal public streets shall be determined by the City based on characteristics of the specific 2 26 PUD Parking lots and driving lanes shall be setback at least 20 feet from all exterior lot lines of a PUD The setback for parking structures including decks and ramps shall be 35 feet from local streets and 50 feet from all other street classifications except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the structure Parking structure setbacks from external lot lines shall be 50 feet or the height of the structure whichever is greater where adjacent to residential property 35 feet when adjacent to nonresidential properties Parking structures setbacks from internal public or private streets shall be determined by the City based on characteristics of the specific PUD Where industrial uses abut developed or platted single family lots outside the PUD greater exterior building and parking setbacks may be required in order to provide effective screening The City Council shall make a determination regarding the adequacy of screening proposed by the applicant Screening may include the use of natural topography or earth berming existing and proposed plantings and other features such as roadways and wetlands which provide separation of uses PUD s must be developed in compliance with buffer yard requirements established by the comprehensive plan m Buffer yards The City Comprehensive Plan establishes a requirement for buffer yards Buffer yards are to be established in areas indicated on the plan where higher intensity uses interface with low density uses In these areas a 50 foot buffer yard is to be provided where the interface occurs along a public street a 100 foot buffer yard is required where the interface occurs on internal lot lines The buffer yard is an additional setback requirement It is to be cumulatively calculated with the required setbacks outlined above The full obligation to provide the buffer yard shall be placed on the parcel containing the higher intensity use The buffer yard is intended to provide additional physical separation and screening for the higher intensity use As such they will be required to be provided with a combination of berming landscaping and or tree preservation to maximize the buffering potential To the extent deemed feasible by the City new plantings shall be designed to require the minimum of maintenance however such maintenance as may be required to maintain consistency with the approved plan shall be the obligation of the property owner Buffer yards shall be covered by a permanently recorded conservation easement running in favor of the City In instances where existing topography and or vegetation provide buffering satisfactory to the City or where quality site planning is achieved the City may 3 27 reduce buffer yard requirements by up to 50 percent The applicant shall have the full burden of demonstrating compliance with the standards herein COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS ISSUE Staff is in the process of reevaluating all commercial districts this includes consolidating and creating two new districts Regional and Community Commercial This corresponds with the City s 2030 Comprehensive Plan discussion See attached Commercial Zoning Use Matrix a Reevaluate Neighborhood Central and Highway Business Districts Nei2hborhood Business District 1 Banks in BN District Current ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit to allow a drive thru bank in the BN District Staff is proposing creating standards that would regulate the drive thru facility These standards would apply to all drive thru windows throughout the City The facility will be evaluated through the Site Plan Permit process If an existing building is converted to a bank or other use requiring a drive thru the conversion will be processed administratively subject to compliance with the standards 2 Buffer yards in commercial district The current ordinance requires an excessive buffer yard in addition to a setback in all commercial districts The original criterion was created to buffer residential districts from industrial sites In 1993 the Planning Commission recommended to amend the ordinance in all commercial districts as well as the industrial districts to increase the buffer A buffer is intended to provide a separation as well as visual protection from a higher use Staff has been encountering situations where this added buffer serves no practical purpose nor does it serve its intent This requirement leads to a variance request in which a hardship must exist There are other means in providing adequate buffering that can be much more efficient and effective than a mandatory buffer area For example the City has a landscaping buffer yard requirement under the landscaping section of the City Code 3 Drive thru window 4 28 The current ordinance does not address drive thru windows for uses other than fast food and banks There are uses such as pharmacy dry cleaning etc that utilize drive thru windows Staff has been regulating them as an accessory use Staff recommends creating specific standards to address all drive thrus within the Supplemental Regulations of the City Code 4 BN District Height limitation The current ordinance limits building height in the BN district to one story Staff is recommending that if there is an adequate buffer between a residential neighborhood and a BN District then a three story building and a maximum height of 35 feet may be permitted These are the same standards as the Residential Single Family District 5 Uses in the BN District In the Neighborhood Business District all stand alone restaurants either fast food or standard require a Conditional Use Permit There are not any standard regulations in the City Code for standard restaurants under the Conditional Use Permit Section The standards for granting a site plan permit adequately address all the concerns associated with restaurants i e noise odor compatibility with surrounding area traffic screening etc The Conditional Use Permit requirement for fast food restaurants was intended when a drive thru was integrated into the use to regulate the loud speaker system etc Staff is proposing developing drive thru window standards in the supplemental regulations This would allow any type of restaurant to be a permitted use in the BN district as well as to allow drive thru windows throughout the City Should a restaurant request a drive thru the facility will be evaluated through the Site Plan Permit process In addition if an existing building is converted to a fast food restaurant or other use requiring a drive thru the conversion will be processed administratively subject to compliance with the standards Central Business District 1 Restaurants in CBD In the Central Business District all stand alone restaurants fast food and standard restaurants require a Conditional Use Permit There not any standard regulations in the City Code for standard restaurants under the Conditional Use Permit Section The standards for granting a site plan permit adequately address the all concerns associated with restaurants i e noise odor compatibility with surrounding area traffic screening etc 5 29 The Conditional Use Permit requirement for fast food restaurants was intended when a drive thru was integrated into the use to regulate the loud speaker system etc Staff is proposing developing drive thru window standards in the supplemental regulations This would allow any type of restaurant to be a permitted use in the CBD district as well as to allow drive thru windows throughout the City Should a restaurant request a drive thru the facility will be evaluated through the Site Plan Permit process In addition if an existing building is converted to a fast food restaurant or other use requiring a drive thru the conversion will be processed administratively subject to compliance with the standards b Eliminate The implications of eliminating the General Business BG district and rezoning these properties to Central Business District CBD See attached BG CBD use matrix c Create As stated in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Draft the City has maintained a longstanding policy of directing commercial development into the Central Business District Following are the new zoning districts the City zoning ordinance will be amended to create the development standards for these districts Community Commercial Big Box Retailers Definition Vision A large scale commercial and office district with a need for high visibility along arterial roads This type of development has a moderate impact on the surrounding environment including but not limited to lighting noise and traffic Location criteria for Community Commercial uses are access to arterial streets preferably at intersections with collector and arterial streets moderate to large sized sites public water and sewer service environmental features such as soils and topography suitable for compact development and adequate buffering by physical features or adjacent uses to protect nearby residential development The total building area for an individual use within any area designated Community Commercial should be no more than 150 000 square feet Goods and Services Examples Furniture and Home Furnishings Electronic and Appliance Stores Building Material and Garden Supplies Auto Parts and Accessories Sporting Goods 6 30 Regional Commercial Definition Vision A mixed commercial district with retail and entertainment uses of a scale and function that serves a regional market The physical environment emphasizes an attractive comfortable walking experience for shoppers and visitors and is designed to serve trail users and mass transit as well as automobile traffic Centers of this type have at least two major retail anchors and are characterized by the diversity and mix ofretail and service uses within their boundaries Uses within this district should complement existing retail users in the other commercial districts Development of these centers shall be planned as a group of organized uses and structures to accommodate a sensitive transition between commercial activities such as loading parking of automobiles lighting and trash collection and surrounding residential uses Such centers shall be designed with one theme with similar architectural style similar exterior building materials and a coordinated landscaping theme Vehicle and pedestrian access is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system The maximum building area of any single use within this district is 250 000 square feet Goods and Services Examples Entertainment Department Store Comparison Shopping Specialty Retail Boutique Restaurants Hotels Residential 7 31 Proposed Commercial Use Matrix CMTY REG CLASSIFICA TIONS BN BH CBD BG BF COMM COMM 01 lOP Notes C P P V eterina Clinic P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P A Delete from BN and BF p P P Type of Entertainment p p P Type of Specialty Retail Delete from CBD District Automotive Dealers Define to Include Trucks Autos Recrtreational G C delete from CBD r iIi Define and add Body to title Delete from CBD C G P District G G Automotive Dealers p p p p P P C G G P s Bellt Sllles G G Book Store P P P P P A Bowlin Center P P Buildin Su I Center P p Camera and photographic supply store p p P Type of Specialy Retail Auto Services Churches I I I I I P I Golf Courses are permitted in the A2 district List P under Private clubs and lod es Cold StaraQ e G r I i 0 r r n i I j I I I I Combine under towers I I i I 1 I I I Commercial Kennels Stables C Commercial Kennels Stables CelBlBereilll Stahles G Commercial Kennels Stables Community Center P P P P P P Consumer Electronics p Type of Specialty Retail Concrete Mixing Plant I Contracting Yard C 32 Convenience Store with gas pumps C C C C Convenience Store without gas p P P P Convention and Conference Facility p p P l LU t Jlt Fi nil r jJ II 1 1I C p P Combine Museum under this listing Dance Studio p p P Type of Entertainment Day Care Center P P P P A AlC Department Store P p Financial Institution Banks Drive thru addressed wi P Supplemental Regulations Type of Specialty Retail Personal Serivices Currently only a CUP in A2 District Automotive Services Expaned to detailed listing C I Drive thru addressed in Supplemental Regulations Fire Station P Florist p p P Type of Specialy Retail Food Processing C Funeral Home P P P Garden Center C P C Gift and Novelty Store P P P Type of Specialty Retail Hardware Goods P Health and Recreation Club P P P 11111 i i 1r l1l 1 1I i Health Services f J 1 i t nu J n n lr l I 11 l i l Delete CUP from Residential add 20 261 standards I Ip II I ill I lr I in Supplemental Regulations Heavy Equipment Rental Truelc Trailer ReDtal C Rename Hobby Toy and Game Store p p P Type of Specialty Retail Home Furnishings P P P Home Improvement Trade P C Delete CUP from Residential add 20 261 standards P in Supplemental Combine HoteUMote1 33 T Personal Serivices Library P Light Industrial P Liquor Store P P P Luggage and Leather Store p Type of Specialty Retail Lumber Yard C d t l e air BoEly Shops G G Automotive Repair Body Shops Meat Market p p P Type of Specialty Retail Miniture Golf P p C Hotel Motel Only Auto related retail Cultural Facility Delete expand to specific list Off premise Parking P Park and Ride for Commuter Rail OpeB Spaee Parks Open Space Outdoor Health ReereatioB Club G Health Club Outdoor Storage C C I C C Parking Lot Structure A A A A A A A A Parking Ramps Structure A A A Park and Ride for Commuter Rail Photocopy and Photography Services PriBt Shops P P P P Kinkos Post Office P Private Clubs and Lodges P P P Private Parks p p t i 1 T i 1 I Offices I j Offices Puhlie Parks Parks Open Space Puhlie Parks Open Space p P Parks Open Space Publishing Printing Ne lVspaper Offiees P P P Recording Studio P 34 PttbIie Recreational Facility P P P P P ReereatiaRal Vehiele Sales G G Automotive Dealers Small ppliaRee Repair Services P P Research Lab C Retail Sales P P P P G A Expand to detailed lisitng Retail Shops P P P P P Expand to detailed lisitng Remove the CUP for stand alone fast food restaurants and develop drive through standards in the Supplemental Regulation section of the city Restaurant Fast Food PIG P PIG P P code 1 nere not any stanaara regUlatIOns III the Clty code for standard restaurants under the Conditional Use Permit Section The standards for granting a site plan permit adequately address the all concerns associated with restaurants i e noise odor compatablity with surrounding area traffic Restaurant Standard PIG P P P P screening etc Schools P P Personal Services Type of Specialty Retail Personal Services ShappiRg CeRter P P P A A A A A A A A A In sign ordiance Single family dwelling P Small Vehicle Sales C i e motorcycle go cart etc Speeialty Retail p p p P G Classifying specific retail Sporting Goods sale rental P P P P G P A Type of Specialty Retail Stationary Store P P P P P A Type of Specialty Retail Supermarket C P P Temporary Classroom structures I Temporary Outdoor Display A A A A A A Temporary Sales Ordinance Temporary Outdoor Sale A A A A A A Temporary Sales Ordinance 35 Theaters Tobacco Store P P P P P P P Used Merchandise Stores P Utility Services P P pIp I C Veterinary Clinic II pill Vocational School Warehousing ITD Q Wholesale Nursery C G PLAN AA Code Revision 2008 Code Update Commercial Use Matrix xls P P P P P P Legend Hotel Motel I IAdd I I Automotive Dealers Offices Parks Open Space I IAutomotive Repair Body Shops Personal Services Automotive Service Towers Health Services I IVeterinary Clinic Type of Entertainment Type of Specialty Retail Combine with Commercial Towers Automotive Dealers Type of Specialty Retail Amimal Hospital under this listing Cold storage under this listing 36 CBO and BG Merger Comparison CLASSIFICATIONS CBD BG Adaptive Reuse Agriculture aimal Hospital P Antennas P P Apparel Sales P P Arcades P P Arts and Craft Supply Store P P Auto Rental Facilities Automotive Dealers G Automotive Repair Body Shops G Automobile Sales G Bakery P P Bars and Taverns P P Bed Breakfast BaEly Shop G Boat Sales G Book Store P P Bowling Center P P Building Supply Center P Camera and photographic supply store P P Commercial Kennels Stables Cammereial Stables Community Center Consumer Electronics Contracting Yard Convenience Store with gas pumps Convenience Store without gas Convention and Conference Facility p p C p p C p 2l I l r 1 11 L t I J c t t Dance Studio P P Day Care Center P P Department Store P J 37 Fire Station Florist P P Food Processing Funeral Home P Garden Center II Gift and Novelty Store P P Hardware Goods P Health and Recreation Club P P i I I 3 T P rJ Heavy Equipment Rental TrueldTrailer ReRtal Hobby Toy and Game Store Home Furnishings Home Improvement Trade Hospitals P P P II Library Light Industrial Liquor Store Luggage and Leather Store Lumber Yard Majer AIJ t R IU ir Bedy Sheps Meat Market Miniture Golf p P G P II 38 Off premise Parking Open Space Outdoor Health Reereation Club Outdoor Storage Parking Lot Structure Parking Ramps Structure A A C A P P P Publishing Printing Newspaper Offiees Recording Studio Publie Recreational Facility Reereational Vehiele Sales Small pplianee Repair Services Research Lab Retail Sales Retail Shops Restaurant Fast Food Restaurant Standard Schools P P P P G P p p p p PiG P p P P Shopping Center SigM Single family dwelling Small Vehicle Sales Speeialty Retail Sporting Goods sale rental Stationary Store Supermarket A p p P P P P P P 39 Temporary Classroom structures Temporary Outdoor Display Temporary Outdoor Sale Theaters Tobacco Store A A p p A A P p Truek Sales Used Merchandise Stores P Utility Services P P Veterinary Clinic P Vocational School Warehousing Wholesale Nursery G PLAN AA Code Revision 2008 Code Update CBD BG Comparison xls Add Automotive Dealers Automotive Repair Body Shops Automotive Services Health Services Legend HotellMotel Offices Parks Open Space Personal Services Towers IVeterinary Clinic 40 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 28, 2008 Mayor Furlong called the work session to order at 5:35 p.m. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Litsey, Councilwoman Ernst, and Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Laurie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, Todd Hoffman, Bob Generous, and Terry Jeffery COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. Kate Aanenson and Bob Gene rous gave a presentation reviewing the proposed changes in all chap ters of the 2030 comprehensive plan update, specifically addressing issues raised at the public hearings. Kate Aanenson outlined the process that was followed to allow for public input a nd in developing a plan for additional commercial and office zoning. Staff and council discussed the specifics surrounding the Gedney parcel and it’s proximity related to the Chaska-Chanhassen border. Mayor Furlong asked for clarification of that border. Kate Aanenson then reviewed specific parcels where si gnificant zoning changes are being proposed. Mayor Furl ong noted the importance of wo rking to connect new with existing neighborhoods. Kate Aanenson reviewed the comments that have been received to date from neighboring cities and counties, also not ing that the Planning Co mmission was requesting that the City Council consider dual guiding on some parcels in the plan. Todd Gerhardt asked staff to explain the term “dual guiding”. Ma yor Furlong asked about th e timing and schedule for approval.. Kate Aanenson noted that th e 6 month comment period will end April 1 st with the hope of completing the process by mid-summer. Mayor Furlong noted the update process has gone well and thanked city staff and comm ission members for their hard work. REVIEW MS-4 NON-DEGRADATIO N REPORT/REVIEW STORMWATER PROJECTS FOR 2008. Todd Gerhardt introduced Terry Jeffery, the new Water Resources Coordinator and asked him to pr ovide background information rega rding his education and work experience. Terry Jeffery then gave a brief re view of the Non-Degrad ation Report requirements and findings for the different elements which c ontribute to degradation of water quality in the city. He reviewed the schedule for the public hearing process and submittal to the PCA. Councilwoman Ernst asked what actions develope rs and contractors could employ to make the soil more pervious. Todd Gerhardt explained what is being done currently, but that the City does not have any requirements. Terry Jeffery reviewed the projects proposed for 2008 and the specifics of the more important projects. Mayor Furlong asked City Council to review what was proposed and submit any feedback to staff. Mayor Furlong adjourned the work session at 7:00 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 41 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JANUARY 28, 2008 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Litsey, Councilwoman Ernst, and Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Roger Knutson, La urie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS: Richard & Janet Cleveland 7380 Longview Circle Bill Thibault 11712 Wayzata Boulevard PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: INVITA TION TO FEBRUARY FESTIVAL. Mayor Furlong invited all residents to February Fest ival being held on Saturday, February 2 nd and outlined the schedule of events. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Litsey moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated January 14, 2008 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated January 14, 2008 Receive Commission Minutes: -Economic Development Authorit y Minutes dated January 14, 2008 b. Resolution #2008-04: Lyman Boulevard Improvement Project 06-03: Approve No Parking Resolution. c. Resolution #2008-05: 2008 Inflow/Infiltration Proj ect 08-07: Approve Plans and Specifications; Authorize Ad for Bid. d. Resolution #2008-06: Liberty on Bluff Creek, Project 05-16: Accept Streets and Utilities. e. Resolution #2008-07: TH 101 Gap Project 04-06: Approve MnDot Landscape Partnership Authorization Resolution. 42 City Council Summary - January 28, 2008 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATE. Sgt. Peter Anderley provided an update on personnel changes made at the first of the year, presen ted the Carver County Sheriff’s reports for the month of December and year end statistics. Chief Greg Geske reported on the activities of the Fire Department for the month of December, year end statistics and comparisons to 2006. He introduced Rick Rice as the new Assistant Chief. PUBLIC HEARING: 2008 STREET IMPROV EMENT PROJECT 08-01: AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. Public Present: Name Address Debbie and Dick Lloyd 7302 Laredo Drive Jerry Paulsen 7305 Laredo Drive Debbie Anderson 7605 Laredo Drive Charles Littfin 7609 Laredo Drive Dave Johnson 711 Laredo Lane Conrad Winkle 505 Highland Drive George Lucas 410 Cimarron Circle Barb Murphy 404 Cimarron Circle Paul Oehme presented the staff report on this it em and introduced Jon Horn with Kimley-Horn and Associates, the consultants for the project, who gave a power point presentation on the specifics of the 2008 Street Improvement Project. He specifically addressed the following issues brought up by residents at the two neighborhood m eetings: the proposed share of assessments for non-residential properties vers us residential properties; and c onsidering that the project area is a collector roadway with a sc hool, fire station and post office located on it, is the 40% share appropriate considering the fact that this roadway provides access to a number of different land uses. Mayor Furlong opened the public hearing, inviting residents to speak by specific roads, asking that residents address the question of whethe r or not the roads in th is area need to be upgraded. Debbie Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive questione d the city’s classifi cation of Laredo Drive not being a collector road, review ed the history of Laredo Drive, and because the entire city benefits from the park, she believes the park should be properly assessed. Jerry Paulsen, 7305 Laredo Drive reiterated that vehicles are pe rmitted in Kerber Pond Park during park hours according to the sign that’s posted, as well as addr essing the issues of tr affic and the assessment on the school. Debbie Anderson, 7605 Laredo Driv e asked for clarification on the difference between a collector road and a non-collector road in terms of assessments. Charles Littfin, 7609 Laredo Drive discussed the amount and times of traffic on Laredo Drive coming and going from the elementary school, the amount of assessment in relation to benefit to his property value, business assessments being less than residential, and disputing the fact that Laredo Drive is a residential roadway. Dave Johns on, 711 Laredo Lane stated the probl em is not whether the road 2 43 City Council Summary - January 28, 2008 3 is a collector or non-collector, but assessments be tween business owners and residents. He also asked staff to address the issue of access from Laredo Lane onto Laredo Drive. Conrad Winkle, 505 Highland Drive asked if council members had r eceived the petition he submitted from the 8 property owners involved in this project and que stioned the need for incl uding Highland Drive in the project, and why only 8 resi dents were being assessed. Ge orge Lucas, 410 Cimarron Circle, also speaking on behalf of hi s neighbor Larry Anderson who lives at 401 Cimarron Circle, questioned the different methodol ogy being used to determine assessments. Barb Murphy, 404 Cimarron Circle objected to the assessments because she felt she was subsidizing the reconstruction of Laredo Lane. She brought up an article in the Star Tribune on January 27 th that talked about a task force that examined the wa ys cities fund road cons truction which concluded that most cities abolished the use of assessments a nd asked the city council to also consider that. She also noted that due to the weakening econo my, she questioned whethe r this was the correct time to do the project and assess residents. Councilman Litsey moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The public hearing was closed. After discussion and comments from c ouncil, the following motion was made. Resolution #2008-08: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Litsey seconded that the City Council adopt a resolution, (amended to delete the phrase, “council resolution adopted January 28 th” and replace with “ordered as prop osed in the feasibility study”), ordering the preparation of plans and specifi cations for City Project 08-01. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTA TION OF MAPLE LEAF AWARD TO CRAIG PETERSON. Mayor Furlong presented Craig Pe terson with the Maple Leaf Award and read the list of his accomplishments and ye ars of service on various commissions and the City Council. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Todd Gerhardt asked if council members had any questions on the key financial stra tegies list, to give him a call. He also asked all residents interested in filling the vacancy left by Craig Pe terson, to obtain an applic ation on the City’s web site, noting the deadline to apply is Thursday at 4:30 p.m. CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried una nimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 44 CHANHASSEN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2008 Mayor Furlong called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. The meeting was opened with the Pledge to the Flag. COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Furlong, Councilman Litsey, Councilwoman Ernst, and Councilwoman Tjornhom STAFF PRESENT: Todd Gerhardt, Roger Knutson, La urie Hokkanen, Kate Aanenson, Paul Oehme, and Todd Hoffman PUBLIC PRESENT FOR ALL ITEMS: Richard & Janet Cleveland 7380 Longview Circle Bill Thibault 11712 Wayzata Boulevard PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: INVITA TION TO FEBRUARY FESTIVAL. Mayor Furlong: Thank you and welcome to everybody here in the council chambers and those watching at home. We’re glad that you joined us. At this time, as members of the council, if there’s any changes or modifications to the agen da, if not we’ll proceed with that. First item here is the, an invitation to Fe bruary Festival as part of our public announcements. The City of Chanhassen again this year is proud to announce our winter special even t. This is the 15 th Annual February Festival. This event is one of many events throughout the y ear that we sponsor. The City sponsors along with Chanhassen Chambe r of Commerce and in cooperation with many of our local businesses who provi de financial support for these ac tivities and events. February Festival be held this coming Saturday, February 2 nd . At this time I’d like to invite all residents, their family, friends to join me and others out on Lake Ann for a fun day of activities. The event will begin at noon with activities such as skating, sledding, and a bon fire out on the ice to warm you up. Hot foods and concessions will be sold by the Chanhassen Rotary Club this year, as well as Boy Scout Troop #330 will be participating agai n selling s’mores kits. Ice fishing contest will run from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. That means you have to start after 1:00 Mr. Gerhardt this year. There will be over 3,000 prizes for the fish. $4,500 in door prizes. It’s a fun event. You can also play bingo by the Friends of the Library. The Friends are also hosting their medallion hunt, which began today it looks like on January 28 th . The person who finds the medallion will receive $750 prize this year. Very nice contri bution by the Friends. You can purchase tickets here at City Hall, the Chanhassen Rec Center and local businesses. If you’d like more information, please check out the city web site and we look forward to seeing everybody out there this coming Saturday. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, you could give me a day head start. Mayor Furlong: Very good. 45 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Litsey moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded to approve the following consent agenda items pursuant to the City Manager’s recommendations: a. Approval of Minutes: -City Council Work Session Minutes dated January 14, 2008 -City Council Verbatim and Summary Minutes dated January 14, 2008 Receive Commission Minutes: -Economic Development Authorit y Minutes dated January 14, 2008 b. Resolution #2008-04: Lyman Boulevard Improvement Project 06-03: Approve No Parking Resolution. c. Resolution #2008-05: 2008 Inflow/Infiltration Proj ect 08-07: Approve Plans and Specifications; Authorize Ad for Bid. d. Resolution #2008-06: Liberty on Bluff Creek, Project 05-16: Accept Streets and Utilities. e. Resolution #2008-07: TH 101 Gap Project 04-06: Approve MnDot Landscape Partnership Authorization Resolution. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. LAW ENFORCEMENT/FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATE. Mayor Furlong: Good evening Sergeant. Sgt. Peter Anderley: Good evening Mayor, council. First of all I’d like to start, January 21 st we did our switch over our personnel they have us he re in Chanhassen. We did have 2 additions, or two changes I guess and faces around here. During the day Deputy Robert Rudd is now working. Deputy Keith Walgrave we nt to the general patrol whic h covers two. He’s still around Chanhassen, Victoria, Laketown Township but definitely Robert Rudd will be working during the day in Chanhassen. And also at night, Deputy Chad Smith is taking over some of the night duties on Sundays through Tuesday. So if you s ee the new face around, in troduce yourself and I’ve advised them to do the same. I put in there the year end numbers. I’ll touch base on those a little bit. They will change a little bit once we get our final stats, usually by 1 or 2, when those come out. Overall our calls did go down. Tota l reported calls went down approximately 290 I believe. A big part of that is th e traffic stops. Traffic stops for the city in general, an officer initiated stop dropped about 600 over the year so th e actual calls from citizens, call in alarms, driving complaints, those type s of things, actually went up 300. Approximately, calls for service. Our big one is December, you know traffi c stops really went down a lot in the month of December. If you look at that, that had a lot to do with road conditi ons. The weather you know 2 46 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 is a very contributing factor. Also the calls that we were taking, you know the alarms. Alarms went up 158 calls on the year. Animal complain ts were up 44. Driving complaints up 42. Medicals were up 73. Those are some of our bi g increases in calls. If there’s any other questions, I’d be happy to answer those as far as th at. Otherwise it’s been a fairly quiet couple of months. We haven’t had any major calls or issues to advise the council of at this time. Mayor Furlong: Thank you Sergeant. Any que stions for the Sergeant? Okay. Very good. Thank you. Chief Geske is here th is evening with the Fire Depart ment. Good evening Chief. Chief Greg Geske: Good evening. Just wanted to update you basically on our numbers so far this year, and then give the report basically for what last year was. So far this year we’ve had 44 calls compared to the same time we had last year was 32 calls. And all of 2007 we ended up with 571 calls, compared to 521 in 2006 or an in crease of 9.5%. Breakdown of those, 31 or 5% of all the calls were actual fires. 230 or 40% of the calls were rescue or medical response. 63 or 11% were hazardous conditions. CO calls would fa ll under that and then calls for gas leaks and such. 92 or 16% were false alarm calls or fals e calls, and 11 or 2% we re weather related so basically that’s a make up for last year so we were ahead a little bit and hopefully our fire education and fire prevention will keep us in chec k this year but it’s st arting up a little bit. I brought along Rick Rice t onight. I’d like to introduce Rick. He’s our new Assistant Chief. Rick’s got 20 plus years on the department and I’ll let him go into some of that. Many of you are familiar with him as your IS person here at the city but I’ll let Rick introduce himself. Mayor Furlong: Good, thank you. Rick Rice: Thank you Chief. I’m sure I’m not a stranger to anyone here. Mayor Furlong: You were almost called up on an emergency tonight. Rick Rice: Mayor Furlong and members of th e council. You all know about me as the IS Coordinator for the city. I’ve been here for about 10 years doi ng that work. I served on the fire department for about 24 years. I’m coming up in March for my 24 th year. I held the position of a Captain. I served two terms as Lieutenant. I’ve done the Training O fficer’s position. I’ve been the SAA Coordinator. I’ve been, I’m curren tly the Secretary on I belie ve the Association of the Trustees, so it’s been fun working for the fire department and I’m going to enjoy this stint as Chief. Looking forward to serving in that capacity. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Good, thank you. Congratulatio ns on your election and Chief Geske, on your re-election. Congratulations as we ll. I noticed by your badges, I sa w in the paper we lost one of the charter members of our department here recently so please extend our condolences to the family. Chief Greg Geske: Thank you. Any other questions? Mayor Furlong: Other thoughts? Questions? Very good, thank you. 3 47 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 PUBLIC HEARING: 2008 STREET IMPROV EMENT PROJECT 08-01: AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS. Public Present: Name Address Debbie and Dick Lloyd 7302 Laredo Drive Jerry Paulsen 7305 Laredo Drive Debbie Anderson 7605 Laredo Drive Charles Littfin 7609 Laredo Drive Dave Johnson 711 Laredo Lane Conrad Winkel 505 Highland Drive George Lucas 410 Cimarron Circle Barb Murphy 404 Cimarron Circle Paul Oehme: Thank you Mayor, City Council me mbers. Annually the city considers street improvement projects to improve the city’s street system. This year Laredo Drive area is recommended for reconstruction. These street s were identified by the city’s pavement management system as needing improvements. These streets can no longer be maintained cost effectively with preventive maintenance such as sealcoats, or crack sealing or patching of potholes. The past 5 years the city has receiv ed more complaints from residents and the traveling public about the condition of Laredo Drive than an y other street in our community. Utilities in this area are old and are recommended to be replaced or repaired. Utility problems include many documented watermain breaks. Sanita ry sewer pipes that ha ve separated joints. Sanitary sewer service pi pes that need replacing. Also the dr ainage system in this area is poor and should be upgraded. Staff has held two neighborhood meetings and staff has also had numerous individual meetings with property owners to discuss the project, and all facets of it. Many emails and phone conversations have also ta ken place. Most of the issues have been raised by the residents, have been identified in your background, or have been received in correspondences directly with you. Staff has also met with Riley-Purgatory Watershed District to see if they would like to in corporate and partner with the c ity on storm water improvements in this area as well. Tonight staff is asking th e council to hold a public hearing and consider ordering the project. This h earing is not to determine asse ssment amounts but rather to determine if the project should be completed to fi nal design. Listening to the residents I believe that the biggest concern with th e project is not the project itse lf, but the assessment methodology. The assessments were based on the City’s prac tice of assessing 40% for street improvements back to the benefiting property ow ners. Staff did try to tie the commercial properties associated with that onto the Laredo Drive assessment cal culations…formula. The formula did make the assessment calculations somewhat complicated a nd confusing to understand at times. Some of the property owners that we’ve talked to ha d some…by benefit to the property, not by trip generation. Staff also needed to take into consideration the othe r access points for the businesses along Laredo Drive in the assessment calculations as well, so tonight we ’d like to discuss the aspects and the importance of this project with the council tonight. We would like to ask for your direction and see if you’re comfortable with the assessment methodology that’s been put together in the feasibility study, and presented here tonight. We did distribute additional 4 48 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 residential correspondences that we received. I th ink the council received some of the same ones for you’re here tonight as well, but if there’s a ny questions that the counc il feels that would like to be addressed, I mean we’re more than happy to try to address them at this time. And also included in your packet was the upd ated resolution for the project as well so, at this time I’d like to invite Jon Horn with Kimley-Horn Associates . They are the consulting engineering working with the city on this project. J on will give a brief presentation . Power point presentation on the project. After the presentation, if there’s any qu estions that the council would like addressed at this time, feel free to ask those a nd we would ask that after that, th at a public hearing be opened. So at this time. Jon Horn: Good evening Mayor, members of the City Council. As Paul mentioned, my name is Jon Horn. I’m with Kimley-Horn and Associates . We have been working with city staff on developing preliminary plans for the 2008 Street Reconstruction Project. We’ve got a brief power point presentation we wanted to run through tonight. Ba sically address a couple of things. Describe the project area to you to help familiarize yourself with th at. Talk a little bit about the scope of the proposed improvements, and talk ab out the reconstruction pr ocess and phasing of staging. Run through the estimated cost, the proposed financing pl an. Talk a little bit more about assessments and then talk briefly about th e schedule. This map s hows the project area is basically Laredo Drive, Laredo Lane, Longview Circle, Highland Drive and Cimmaron Circle. About 1.35 miles of city streets is included as part of the project north of West 78 th Street. In terms of what’s out there today, the current streets in the area are bitumi nous, however they don’t have any concrete curb and gutter. Generally ranging in width from about 26 feet wide to 35 feet wide. It’s proposed as a part of this project that they be reconstr ucted to the city standard section with concrete curbs and gutters on both sides. We’re proposing various wi dths for the roadways ranging anywhere from 28 feet wide to…the southerly piece next to the school would be 36 feet wide. North of that going to 31 and then the cul-de-sac roadways in the ar ea are proposed to be constructed to a 28 foot width… On e of the things that the City doe s as a part of all their street reconstruction projects is to look at the condition of existing utilities in the area. As Paul mentioned, sanitary sewer condition assessment’s been done. There’s some repair work that would be done as a part of the project. Sanita ry sewer repair work that would be done. The watermain in the project area is in poor conditi on and is proposed that the watermain be replaced as a part of the project. Again the plan is to take care of all the undergro und utilities prior to the street being reconstructed on top of them. Drainage improvements is one of the big challenges of the project just because of the project sits right adjacent to Lotus Lake. Water quality issues in Lotus Lake and one of the challenges is, what can we do in the project area to help improve the quality of runoff being discha rged to the lake. As Paul me ntioned, we’ve been working with the watershed district as well as Lotus Lake Wa ter Quality Association to try to develop some means in providing some treatment in the area, looking everywhere from treatment ponds to rain water gardens, treatment manholes, really explor ing a number of different alternative techniques for the drainage. This map shows the general dr ainage areas in green an d purple or blue areas drain into Lotus Lake. It shows a number of circles on the exhibit th at shows potential ponding locations. Be looking at the possi bility of constructing regional treatment ponds at a number of locations in the project area, so that’s an ongoing proce ss again working with the lake association as well as the watershed district . Rain water gardens is some thing that’s becoming more and more common around town. Basically the concept is , you identify areas. Y ou have special soil runoff runs into the rain water gardens and it in filtrates into the ground. There’s plant materials 5 49 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 in the rain gardens that actually use up the wate r and use it for plant ma terials. This shows a cross section as well as an example rain garden th at’s actually been constructed in the city of Burnsville. Again, more common techniques trying to treat stormwater and that’s something that as the project proceeds forward, we will look at opportunities to include some rain gardens into the project scope. I mentioned treatment manholes. There’s al so technologies out there today where there’s actually a structure where stormwater flows in. It’s treated. It flows out. Another technique that we would look at as a part of this storm water system. Construction process, a couple of constraints we need to deal with. Laredo Drive, the s outherly piece as a staging area for the 4 th of July parade so we certainly need to consider where the c onstruction process or stage, how to avoid that. At least until after th e parade’s over. You’ve got the school to deal with to try to make sure that all the constr uction activity, or a major ity of the construction activities happen during non-school ti mes. Then we just got the issue of trying to minimize impacts to residents. The intention would be as the project proceeds forward, to have multiple stages of construction to help address all those various issu es, and again a challenge that we would have to deal with as the project proceeds forward with construction. In terms of estimated costs. This table identifies the estimated cost for the project, a little over $2.9 million, including the streets, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain improvements. Financing summary. About $1.6 million of that project cost is propos ed to be funded through the City’s revolving assessment fund, of which about $700,000 is asse ssments to benefiting properties that are included specifically in this pr oject area. The remainder of th e project cost would be funded through various city utility funds. A little bit more on the specific assessments. As Paul mentioned, this has probably b een the issue that’s raised th e most question of the property owners in the area. Consistent with past city methodology, the inten tion would be to assess approximately 40% of the project cost to the be nefiting property owners. Paul mentioned that there is state statute that kind of identify how this would be done. One of the requirements is you need to be able to prove benefit to the properties that are assessed. As a part of this process the City has done an assessment, or appraisal review of the assessments to see if they would be justified and whether the properties do benefit. As I mentioned, the total assessable cost is a little over $700,000, with the City fu nding the remainder of the cost s. One of the challenges of the project, there’s a mixture of la nd uses in the area. There’s a bout 80 residential properties and 6 non-residential properties. A methodology was used that addresses for the non-residential properties, they have multiple street frontages an d multiple driveways and that was factored into the assessment methodology. So that was kind of th e technique that was used to try to sort through how much of the non-reside ntial properties should pay in assessments. And again these are estimated assessments. The estimated assessmen t for the individual residential properties is a little over $7,000 per unit. It’s proposed to be on a unit basis, but based upon what we’ve seen for bid prices last year as well as what we continue to see for bid prices this year, we would certainly expect good bid prices and it’s possible that those as sessment amounts could drop after the actual bids are opened and the construction costs are determined through those construction bids. Paul mentioned we went through, we’ve gone through a public involvement process. There was a neighborhood meeting on November 14 th . A number of resident comments and questions came out of that ne ighborhood meeting and staff has b een dealing with those over the last few months, and then we met again with the residents last We dnesday night on the 23 rd . Ran through a very similar presentation with the reside nts to give them a be tter understanding of the project, as well as to take comments and questi ons. You can see by the number of people that are sitting in the council chambers tonight, a lot of questions and concerns on the assessments. 6 50 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Really focusing on a couple of different issu es and I’m sure you’ll hear from a number of residents tonight. One is the proposed share of assessments for the non-residential properties versus the residential property is fair. The other concerns that due to the nature of the project area being a collector roadway, with a school, a fire station and a post office, is that 40% city share really appropriate consider ing the fact that this roadway provides access to a number of different land uses, and again I’m sure you’ll hear a number of those comments from the residents tonight as you take public testimony on the project, but there has been an ongoing process. I know in the staff report background it suggests that council ta ke testimony tonight and certainly staff would be willing to work together with the resident s to try to look at alternative assessment methodologies if the council feels th at’s appropriate. In terms of schedule. Tonight’s the public hearing. If the council elects to proceed ahead, we would propose that the council approve the final plans and specs for the proj ect in late February. We’d proceed to a bid opening in the end of March. Assessment hearing would then occur in April. We prepared a final assessment roll, and that would go to council and we’d have the hearing on April 28 th . And then assuming council still wants to proceed ahead with the project, construction start in May and run through a majority of the summer to be co mpleted in September. There certainly would be some phasing and staging as I mentioned to a ddress some of the specific constraints in the project area. So that’s a real ly quick overview of the project . I guess we’ll open it up to any council questions at this time. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Questions for Mr. Ho rn. Just one thing to, just from clarification so that we don’t get hung up on te rminology. I know words mean things, and that is the, how we describe this road as a collector or a local road and a lot of people drive on different streets but we have certain terminology in the report. Ther e was some information a bout the differentiating between local roads and collector roads. Is this considered a collector road in terms of our overall transportation system? Paul Oehme: It’s not consider ed a collector road in our stre et system. They’re typically it doesn’t generate enough traffic to be considered a collector ro adway. Typically you see volumes of traffic well above 2,000 trips per day. Mayor Furlong: I just wanted to clarify from a wording standpoint ther e. I’ve got some other thoughts and comments. I’m guessing other members of the council too but I’d just as soon hear from the residents, if that’s okay? Councilman Litsey: Yeah, I’d just as soon move ahead. Mayor Furlong: So at this point, why don’t we go ahead, unless there’s any other questions at this point for staff. My thought is, and Mr. Horn if you could kind of stay close as people raise issues, perhaps we can address them right there rather than trying to gather a big list for later. What I’ll do is invite up resident s to come. If it makes sense, we can try to do this by road. I think there are a number of people that want to talk and that way rather than bouncing around through the project ar ea, if there’s specific i ssues regarding a particul ar street, those can be addressed together. And what I would ask resident s to do, if possible, is we’ve got a number of people that want to talk. We want to hear ever ybody but we don’t need to be here all night either so we’ll try to limit comments to about 5 minut es, if that’s possible for anybody. A lot of the 7 51 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 issues have been brought forth to us, but we want to make sure that everybody has an opportunity to speak as well. So if that makes sense, at least we’ll se t some ground rules that we’ll try to live by and why don’t we start with any residents on Laredo Drive itself. We’ll open up the public hearing here and if anyone on La redo Drive would like to address the council, I would invite them forward at this time. Debbie Lloyd: Debbie Lloyd, 7302 Laredo Drive. I di dn’t expect to be the first tonight. First isn’t so bad I guess. Okay, is Laredo Drive a collector street? Based upon one 48 hour and one 51 hour traffic count, the City claims Laredo doe sn’t qualify. There are some findings. Laredo Drive is a unique street within Chanhassen. It wasn’t originally built or designed to be a collector but it has lived up to th e reputation of serving as one. Originally Laredo had a different name, and it was just a short street. It came up to Highland from the cul-de-sac I live on, and went down Highland down to Frontier. Ultimate ly Laredo stretched eventually up to West 78 th Street and provided access straight up. Then la ter Frontier Trail opened to the west and provided access to what is now Bryan’s neighborhood. So what was a short street with continuity, became a very long street of continuity and it along with Frontier Trail connects the city from Kerber Boulevard, which is a collector. Or arterial. I’m not sure. To, all the way up to West 78 th broadly, or through the middle up to West 78 th . When they opened up Fr ontier Trail, the council at that time felt it was very important to open it up for safety reasons, and maybe with the fire marshal here he could address that point. But an yway, it wasn’t originally designed or built to be a collector. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Excuse me, I don’t mean to interrupt you but do we have a map we can put up so as she’s talking we can follow al ong. Thanks, that’s just helpful for me. Debbie Lloyd: Oh sure. My map is a little bit different. It’s th e same map but this is Laredo. Where it started, originally it went like this. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I don’t think it’s up. Todd Gerhardt: It has to be on the X so it can zoom in. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Why don’t you try again. Thanks. Debbie Lloyd: Originally it was just a short street up here to Highland and down. Then it eventually came up here and other neighbors who lived here at the time could expound on that. Went up here through a swamp, whic h leads to some of the issues that we have on Laredo Lane, which by the way I have to insert at this poi nt. Laredo Lane, any time you hear double frontage, this is a reason not to do double frontage. And you’ll see later in how many lots have frontage on Laredo Lane plus Laredo Drive and what kind of cost that adds to the scenario for us. Then eventually it opened all the way up to West 78 th . So Frontier Trail curves down here to Kerber. Kerber, up like this provides access from the fire station to those neighborhoods and beyond. Should something be closed on Kerber, this is how the fire trucks would go, is what we were told at the time they opened up that ro adway. And also Frontier of c ourse goes this way. So Laredo really is integral to the whole system here. The project area, you’ve identified 86 parcels of property, but on my map here conservatively coun ting the homes that would naturally flow to 8 52 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Laredo Drive, and I say conservative because there are segments of the neighborhood I didn’t include at all. Conservatively all the neighborhoods that feed onto Laredo to go to the school, the park, the post office, to go up to the City Hall, to go down Market Street for shopping, there are 259 homes. Now you say that isn’t a lot of traffi c. Well here is a collector street, Longacres Drive. Longacres, between 17 and 41, 248 homes, and I was being really kind there too. I counted almost every single home, even though that also has another out on Hunter. So this is 100% residential. Laredo had more homes conser vatively plus commercial, isn’t considered to be a collector street. Laredo Drive serves as th e access to Chanhassen’s only U.S. Post Office, which has over 1,000 active customers. Chanhassen ’s main fire station is on Laredo Drive. Chanhassen’s elementary school is on Laredo Drive. Bluff Creek Elementary, the other elementary in Chanhassen is also on a collector street. Chanhassen’s City Center Park and Kerber Pond Park are on this street. It is not solely a residential…street. It also serves commercial properties. Another issue. Kerber Pond Park. Staff report that you have dated January 28 th says there is no vehicle access or parki ng associated with this frontage. We maintain that the City should pay some fees associated with having that park there. In the, and by the way, this is how much acreage the park has. Everything in yellow is Kerber Pond Park. It’s comprised of 5 different parc els. There are two accesses to th e park. One is off Sierra Trail and the other is off Laredo Drive. In the 2030 co mp plan, which you just l ooked at, it states that there is on street parking, and this was part of the comp plan. The image. So it states an entrance is off Laredo and there’s on street parkin g which is on Laredo Drive. Here’s a picture of the access to the park. City of Chanhassen park hours, 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. No person or vehicle allowed in park after hours. Person or vehicle. Vehicles pr ohibited from off road travel. Okay. Despite the fact that in the report, and in our public meeti ng we were told that vehicles don’t go down that road. Well guess what? City ve hicles maintain that road. It’s critical for emergencies should anything happen down there, th e two ways in are off Laredo Drive or off Sierra Court. The entire city be nefits from the park and we believe that the park should properly be assessed in this deal. The apartments on Sa nta Vera Drive. That’s another question. Mayor Furlong: How much longer are you going to… Debbie Lloyd: I’ll take my husband’s time okay? Is that okay with you Dick? Dick Lloyd: Sure. Debbie Lloyd: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Okay. We’re coming up on almost 10 minutes already. Debbie Lloyd: Maybe there’ll be someone else that I can…too. This is an overview of the apartments. The apartment’s assessment was one-half of the total acreag e of the parcel. The reason there’s a wetland on the property. The findi ng is that the wetland has not been delineated. We believe it was an arbitrary decision. Here’s photos of the trees and the wetland, and I have to ask, does the city have another purpose in mind for this land? And is it fa ir for the taxpayers on Laredo Drive reconstruction to pay for whatever that other purpose is, but you’re not assessing this parcel’s property to the full va lue. I’ll end with that, thank you. 9 53 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Mayor Furlong: Alright, tha nk you. One question I would ask Ms. Lloyd before you leave, and I forgot to set this at the beginning so that’s why I’m calling you back. One of the questions before the council tonight with regard to author izing plans and specificati ons is whether or not, the real part of the pub lic hearing here, but we’ve slid over in to the assessments, whether or not the road needs to be upgraded. Whether there is a need to upgrade the road, so I guess I would ask you and I would ask others that come up too, to make sure you at least address that with all your comments so, do you believe the project should be done? Debbie Lloyd: Yes, and I did send an email toda y. I obviously the road has a lot bumps in it, but I’d like to know what year it really came up on the study on this street improvement plan to be reconstructed? How many years it’s been de layed. How many years it’s been put off, and I also heard that there’s a lot of complaints a bout it. I’d sure like to know you know where the complaints are coming from. Are they coming from the neighborhood? Are they coming from outside the neighborhood, which I can tell you they are because I sat in here when other, there have been other reconstruction projects in the ci ty and people always point to Laredo Drive. So that also tells me they use it. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Okay, so the answer is yes, it needs to be upgraded? Debbie Lloyd: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Let’s address some of her questions if we can. Paul Oehme: Sure. Real quic k, Ms. Lloyd is right that you know the southern half of Laredo Drive does take quite a significant traffic. I mean it’s the first block from 78 th Street to Chan View and then basically north of there onto th e school so, but again it ’s not considered, we haven’t defined it as a collector roadway just based upon the crit eria that we have based upon engineering documentation and criteria used fo r categorizing collector roadways. And again north of Saratoga, if you’re south of Saratoga and Laredo Drive is 1,200 to 1,800 trips per day. North of Saratoga we’re down to 300 trips per day, which tells me that the neighborhood, this area is functioning as a nei ghborhood roadway system and not functioning as a collector roadway. Just as a clarification too on the Ke rber Park Pond, Todd Hoffman our Park Director can chime in if he wants to but there are definite ly, at least 3 access points to Kerber Boulevard. We did not include this parcel in our assessment, preliminary assessment roll based upon it’s, can you consider it an outlot? There is no vehicle access. No driveway access to the park at this time, and we did not consider that a benefit si nce everything is coming off of Laredo Lane and other access points. No parking in the park as well so, this acce ss point can be more considered a local access point and parcel, or the access poi nt on Kerber Boulevard, I think there’s more public benefit access points out on Kerber. The apartment question that she had, we did decrease the size of the apartment complex lot based upon our judgment. That being a wetland or water resources coordinator did recommen d that be looked at in the fu ture and preserved as a wetland. Potentially upgraded. Also the apartment comple x does access off of Saratoga and other streets, so we did have to consider that in the a ssessment calculation as well for benefit so. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. 10 54 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Councilwoman Tjornhom: You know I’m sorry. I had one question. Mayor Furlong: Please. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I am sorry. Can you re view or explain to me what our policies are when we are assessing parks in the city? Do we have one set design that we use? For parks. Paul Oehme: I’m trying to recall. Councilwoman Tjornhom: I’m sorry. Paul Oehme: I’m trying to recall. Councilwoman Tjornhom: We’ve had this happen before. Paul Oehme: Yeah. South Shore Drive. Last y ear’s project. We did look at access to that park and specifically the boat landing an d the parking lot associated w ith that park and we did do a benefit analysis on that parki ng lot and access to the park and we did incorporate additionally units, assessment into the park, which the City did pay for based upon the percentage that we had. So we did increase, and it wasn’t just one si ngle family lot. It was, I can’t recall right off the top of my head but there were several units th at we used in that scenario that the City did contribute to that project. Councilwoman Tjornhom: But we’re using that sa me formula in analyzing Kerber Park also. Paul Oehme: Right. I mean using that same crite ria. I mean there’s no, th e trail does have to get maintained so there is maintenance vehicles th at have to get down th ere. Obviously you know we need to get emergency access vehicles down there if there is an emergency so, but on a daily basis on a public benefit basis, we did not see that being a benefit right now for this project. Councilwoman Ernst: A question. Mayor Furlong: Sure, Councilwoman Ernst. Follow-up. Councilwoman Ernst: Paul, did you say that there are 3, approximately 300 trips a day going down that road? And that’s why, is th at, did I hear you correctly on that? Paul Oehme: Yeah, I mean north of Saratoga. The trips do significantly drop off, or north of Saratoga the trips do significantl y drop off versus south of Saratoga. South of the apartment complex. That’s where the commercial and the non -residential units are. You know a lot of the trips can be generated, or are generated by the ap artment complex or the, the apartment complex, the school district and the post office. Those are the ones that generate the most traffic. Councilwoman Ernst: Okay, thank you. 11 55 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Councilman Litsey: Just a quick follow-up on that. Do you ever do dual classifications on roads? In other words, if a portion of it’s taki ng a heavier load, or do you look at the totality of the road and average it out? That sounds like what, that’s what we’ve done here. Paul Oehme: Yeah, typically you want to look at for collector roadways, you want to look at where does the collector roadway go. Typically you want to have collector roadways start from a collector roadway and end at a collector roadwa y. The connection points so that’s the way our system’s set up. Here, in this case it really doesn’t go to another collector roadway and based upon the volumes of traffic, you know that’s the reason why we haven’t ha d a dual designation. Councilman Litsey: But because they kind of go up and back presumably on the same segment of roadway there, perhaps would that not be a justification for sepa rating that out or? Paul Oehme: Yeah, I. Councilman Litsey: One part being you know a main. Paul Oehme: I mean we can look at that again but I, again it gets back to how much is the traffic, how much is it generating and based upon our criteria, it doesn’t generate enough traffic to push it into that category. Councilman Litsey: As a whole? Paul Oehme: As a whole. Mayor Furlong: Even, as I understand it, even the southern part of th at road from West 78 th up past the school to the apartments. Councilman Litsey: Does not generate enough? Mayor Furlong: Doesn’t generate enough to get th e, it’s more than th e northern section. Councilman Litsey: But not enough to meet the crit eria we’ve established for collector road? Paul Oehme: Right. I mean, righ t. That’s where our standard. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Thank you. Next Mr. Paulsen, good evening. Jerry Paulsen: Mr. Mayor and councilors. Jerry Paulsen, 7305 Laredo Drive and due to emphasize the bottom of Kerber Pond Park and not permitting vehicles and the sign says vehicles are not permitted after pa rk hours close and I can, it’s perfect ly legal for me to drive my car from the Laredo side up and exit onto Sierra Trail. There’s no, there’s nothing illegal about that from my understanding. Any car can drive over that route, according to the sign that’s posted there. I’d like to addre ss two issues. Traffic a little bi t more, and then the assessment on the school. The City, you conducted two traffic counts, as Paul sa id. One was at the southern end, one was at the northern end of Laredo. I to ok it upon myself to do a little bit of counting. 12 56 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 The City came up with an averag e of 1,450 vehicles on what they considered the heavily portion, out at the south end, per day. 1,450 per day. I did three manual traffic counts during November and January and last week I gave the City a copy and you might have gotten those graphs. The three graphs showing the three different points of study, and if you didn’t, I’ll get you a copy. The City has a count on Laredo just south of what they call Chan View so that, I think it was the same week that I took mine anyway. I count ed over 300 vehicles per hour for a couple hours there in the afternoon, and I estimated traffic to be about, a little over 3,000 vehicles per day. I didn’t stick it out for 24 hours. It got a little cold sitting in the car at times so I didn’t take a complete sample, although I tried to stretch it ov er several hours at thre e different points. One reason that my count was a little bit different from the City’s is they had their’s opposite the Post Office, south of Chan View so the traffic comi ng from Chan View, turning north or coming from the City Hall, Post Office from there and turni ng north would not have been counted by their counters. So that accounts for a fairly good chu nk of traffic which they would not have picked up from their counting. The City also set up a co unter at the north entran ce to the school, and I haven’t received any results from that back fr om the City to indicate what they might have counted, but there are in fact two entrances to the school ther e so they may have only have picked up half the traffic that wa s realistically. So the staff repor t that you’re reading says that local, excuse me, local traffic, or the local streets carry something in the neighborhood of 2,000 vehicles per day. If you bump it up to 3,000, which my statistics show at least at the south end here, where you are in the category of a collector street and the collect or street is the city is kind of admitting they’re doing this because they’re bu ilding it 36 feet wide, which is the width for a collector street, from West Main, from West 78 th up to Saratoga. So we ’re, at least that chunk up there, that portion could justify being called a collector street. The other issue then I’d like to address on the assessment on the school itself. Th e 15 acre parcel is owned by the school. It is titled to the school. The City has calculated the school assessment on the basis of the school having about 5.2 acres of that 15, not the 15, so they’re not assessing on the basis of the full 15 acre. The City says they have a verbal agreement with the school to utilize that land jointly with the school. There is no formal agreement so it’s, the school does own th at land and the 15 acres is under their title. The comprehe nsive plan, the City shows the City Center Park to occupy a portion of that lot. As a matter of fact it shows the whole area, including the school in green if you look at the city map. But one thing that kind of …after a while, it said the fire station had 4.6 acres and it didn’t seem to jive with the size of th e bank or the other ones, and that 4.6 acres in fact goes from the fire station a ll the way back to what they call the warming area back in here. But the comprehensive plan also, it’s kind of ambi guous and it says that the 3 of the 15 acres of school property is part of City Center Park, and I don’t quite unde rstand what’s going on there. Anyway, these three additional acr es supposedly being part of 3 out of the 15 being in City Center Park, they are still owned by the school and therefore the school should be assessed the full 15 acres that are not being assessed them. So my question is why th e City not intending to assess those 15 acres in th eir entirety. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: And Mr. Paulsen again, the question I as ked Mrs. Lloyd in terms of the need for the project and the upgrade. What are your thoug hts there. Whether or not it’s needed. Jerry Paulsen: Pardon me, how’s that? 13 57 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Mayor Furlong: Is the project, do the improvement s need to be made? To Laredo Drive and to the other roads. Jerry Paulsen: Considering they haven’t, the wa y that they’ve patched th e street, they haven’t tried to make it long term and so it has degraded, and especially around the curve I think is the worst part, which is admitted…by the swampy area. It probably didn’t have a good enough base and Laredo is probably worthy of reconditioning. I’m not sure about the cul-de-sac. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Any follow-up questions for Mr. Paulsen from anyone? Otherwise Mr. Oehme and Todd, there’s probably a question coming to you too but why don’t you start. Paul Oehme: Well I’ll hit on maybe what Todd wa s getting at, but you know our trail system’s not designed to take commuter traffic. I mean nobody should be driving th eir private vehicles on our trails. Even motorized vehicl es, mopeds or those type of vehi cles are not allowed on our trail system so you know if the trail, or if the sign is wrong, I mean we should address that issue in terms of vehicle traffic on our trail systems in Kerber Pond Park so. Mayor Furlong: Our ordinances don’t just restrict it during park hours? Paul Oehme: No. It restricts it all the time. Mayor Furlong: Alright. Paul Oehme: Real quickly too. In terms of the street width a nd the collector roadway issue, I mean the City is picking up the over sizing cost already for the roadway width from a 31 foot up to a 36 foot road right-of-way, or roadway widt h so in terms of the cost there, that’s you know the City’s already doing that in c onjunction with the commercial prope rties. It’s not, that cost is not being distributed to the resi dential properties along the street. The fire station, I think when the property was purchased I think it was 4, a little over 4 acres wort h of property there. It has been split off into park and to the school district. So I’ll leave it at that but in terms of the school district assessment, we did decrease the total amount of acreage for th e school district based upon you know half of their property is ballfields a nd other associated outdoor activities that take place there. It’s really, there is access off of Kerber Boulevard fo r those type of uses. As you all know Mayor that in the summertime the City Ha ll parking lot is packed with residents and parents going to ball games and soccer games s o, that’s kind of the methodology behind how that was, that assessment was determined for the school district. Councilman Litsey: It seems to me just from personal observations, the majority of the people using that park for the soccer and so forth are parking on Kerber, or on the City Hall parking lot because I see them… Paul Oehme: That was our rationale behind decreasing the amount of total acreage in our assessment just because. Councilman Litsey: It’s hard to get through there sometimes. 14 58 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Paul Oehme: Yeah, I mean and people are going to want to walk the closest they can. They don’t want to walk as far from, Laredo Drive, from the parking lot over to the ballfields. I mean they’d rather walk closer from Kerber Boul evard access points and City Hall parking lots. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor, council members. You know when the fields are being used, the majority of the people, no question use City Ha ll and Kerber but there are people that do park over in the school parking lots. It depends on what location you’re coming from but it is utilized. Primarily June, July, August timeframes when youth activities are going on so you know, and that’s why the school district did get an assessment for Laredo. Councilwoman Ernst: Paul, is th e City paying for the difference between the 31 and the 36 foot wide road? Paul Oehme: Yes. Yeah, they are. I mean that’s not in the assessment calculations for the residential piece. Councilwoman Ernst: Okay. And then can you address Mr. Paulsen’s comments about the differences with the counts. I mean he was talking 3,000 versus 300 or. Paul Oehme: Yeah, I’m not sure exactly when he was out there, what that criteria was but I mean we’ve got our standard 48 hour counts th at we use based upon what MnDot recommends so, and those are the counts that we took. Maybe on another day it would be slightly different than the counts that we had but. Councilman Litsey: Would the count down toward s more of the southerly part, was that done, this can sound confusing now, north of Chan View? Paul Oehme: I believe it was south of Chan View. Councilman Litsey: It was south of Chan View, so would it have picked up, because there was a comment made that wouldn’t have picked up like post office traffic and that kind of stuff. Paul Oehme: Well to get in the post office you need to go onto Chan View so, so you would have to go through that block of roadway to get to the post office. And you have to go access onto Chan View so it would have picked up the counts from the post office. Councilman Litsey: Okay, thanks. Mayor Furlong: Alright. Thank you. Any othe r follow-up questions at this time? Okay. Anyone else from Laredo Drive at this time? Debbie Anderson: Hi Mayor and council members. My name’s Debbie Anderson. I live at 7605 Laredo Drive and I just actually have a quick question because I haven’t been able to attend any of the prior meetings and so I apologize if I’m the only pers on in this room that doesn’t 15 59 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 know the answer but, what exactly is the differen ce between a collector ro ad and a non-collector road in terms of assessments? And that’s just my question so. Paul Oehme: Sure. Debbie Anderson: And I think we definitely need some. Paul Oehme: Thank you. You know we’ve dealt with this on other pr ojects as the council knows. Lake Lucy Road’s a good example of that . We milled and overlayed that road a couple years ago. That roadway is a collector roadwa y. It was over designed to handle the additional traffic, especially on that roadway. Audience: A little louder. Audience: Yeah, we can’t hear you. Paul Oehme: Okay. Audience: We can’t hear you back here. Paul Oehme: I don’t know if my mic’s on or not? Mayor Furlong: Nann, are the mic’s working? That’s fine. Just, let’s everybody speak up then. Paul Oehme: Okay. Lake Lucy Road was, is a collector roadway. The City did overlay that roadway. Include that roadway several years a go. There is residential benefit for those improvements but what the City did, we took out the over sizing costs and looked at the over sizing from a collector roadway system down to a residential roadway. Kind of the same methodology we’re doing here. The pavement sec tion that we’re proposing is the exact same where this section of street is, is for the residential section of street. The only difference is the roadway width. The roadway width cost right now is being proposed to be paid for at 5 foot wide over sizing be paid for by the Cit y. It’s not being assessed back to the property owners, so we’re trying to treat everybody that lives on a higher volume road ve rsus a lower volume road the same. That’s the practice that the City has been working with. Successfully for the last couple years. Mayor Furlong: So to clarify, just from my understanding, if the proj ect included a 31 foot width road all the way from West 78 th up north, the cost of that is being included in the calculation for the assessments. The fact that we’re building the road wider at one segment is being paid for entirely through the city by taxpayers. Paul Oehme: That’s correct. Mayor Furlong: My underst anding? Okay. Thank you. 16 60 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Councilwoman Tjornhom: But I mean just to jump in here quickly. Let’s assume that this already was a collector road. It already was the width of a collector road. Would the properties be assessed different because of that? Paul Oehme: No. They’d be assessed. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Because it was a collector road. Paul Oehme: Yeah, they would be assessed. Councilwoman Tjornhom: Is that what you’re asking? Debbie Anderson: Yes, thank you. Paul Oehme: What they’re bei ng assessed today. There’s again. Councilwoman Tjornhom: So there’s no different standards or rates for collector roads… Paul Oehme: …we try to standardize roadway a ssessments from a person that lives on a cul-de- sac versus somebody that lives on a 10,000 ATD street. Standardize it in term s of benefit and in terms of how much that cost is for that section of roadway based on the re sidential street section that we have today. Councilwoman Tjornhom: So then if I live on Laredo Drive, it really is no be nefit to call part of that, beginning of Laredo a collector road because it’s not going to change any numbers? Paul Oehme: It’s not going to change the asse ssment that we have in the, as a preliminary assessment. Councilman Litsey: So quite simply put, it’s a standard methodology used for all streets in the city and the designation really is not going to impact the amount of money that someone is going to pay getting that changed. Paul Oehme: Yeah, the de signation is irrelevant. Councilman Litsey: Okay. Paul Oehme: We’re trying to get back down to what the benefit is for a resident on whatever street we have in the community. Todd Gerhardt: Mayor and council members, we call that a reside ntial equivalent. You know if you were to build a brand new street, if you were to build a brand new street in a subdivision, there would be costs associated w ith that street for that single family home. And that is what we’re doing here is looking at it as a residential equivalent for the cost of doing that. Paul’s already stated time and time again that over sizing the road is being picked up by the City. It is 17 61 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 not included in that $705,000 so I don’t think we need to talk about co llector roads anymore when it comes to this project. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Any follow-up questions? I think, does that an swer your question? Debbie Anderson: You know I still just don’t understand if we’re ta lking the difference between, I mean I understand that part of Laredo Dr ive is used more than the rest of it, although …the only way to go but that, my qu estion really I think is different . If you have a collector road that is definitely a collector ro ad and the entire road would be called a collector road by your criteria, which I don’t know what that is, but would that be assessed differently than Laredo Drive than this project? Todd Gerhardt: No. Debbie Anderson: Based on percentages and. Mayor Furlong: Yeah, and the si mple answer I hear is no. Debbie Anderson: Okay, thank you. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Others from Laredo Drive. Good evening. Charles Littfin: Good evening. Thank you for letti ng me speak. My name is Charles Littfin. I live on 7609 Laredo Drive. Right across from th e elementary school. I’ve lived in Chanhassen since 1960. I grew up one block over east of wher e I live now. Those two roads are night and day. Laredo Drive is so busy, tr affic starts from 6:00 in the mo rning. The first delivery truck goes to the elementary school, which is an 18 whee ler, and this thing runs even when there’s road restrictions. Other traffic rolls in about 6:30. That’s when parents who work drop off their kids. And if these parents are late for wor k, you don’t date go out on that road because they drive fast. And that goes til 6:00 when that shuts down and they have to pick their kids up. After that, sports goes on up at th e school. That goes til 9:00 every night. Saturday, sports is up at the school from 8:00 in the morning til 8:00 at night. These are all city programs. Parking on Laredo Drive can be a real prob lem too when there’s a function at the school. Or any day. There’s cars parked on Laredo Drive all the time. They park in front of my mailbox. I don’t get delivery service. White Bear Lake, where my wi fe grew up, has an ordinance if there’s a school in a residential area, no school parking on that ro ad. That’s strictly re sidential parking only. From what I heard tonight from the sheriff, or not the sheriff’s, but the police officer, and fire department, they’re getting a lot more calls. That just means the fire department’s going to be a lot busier. Saturday’s paper had an article abou t growth in Chanhassen. It hasn’t slowed down. That means this road is going to get busier and busi er all the time. Let’s see where I’m at here. If anybody saw the Star and Tri bune on Sunday, there was an arti cle in there about assessing roadways. Apparently we’re not the only one that has the problem . There was a special session that they said, or there’s a sp ecial assignment by law supposed to be provide a financial benefit to the homeowner that is roughly to equal the cost they pay for the project. This project’s going to cost me between $7,000 and $8,000. I am not going to benefit at all like that from this project. As a matter of fact I’ll probably lose ground because it will be wi dened where I live. That will 18 62 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 take ground cover away from my property. And if I ever plan on doing anything in this town, ground cover is huge. They talk about businesses pa ying less. I don’t think that’s right either. Businesses that are on Laredo Drive, they make money. I don’t make any money on this road, and there’s a lot more businesses than just the 4, or whatever the City says. Axel’s for instance. All their delivery trucks end up on Laredo Drive, and they’re not even being assessed anything. That alley way that runs behind th e little mall, all the delivery tr ucks go down there and they end up on Laredo. If this is a reside ntial road, which I don’t think it is, when that gas tanker pulls in to fill up at the gas station, that blocks off traffic til he can back that thing in there. Not to mention all the trucks that go to the post office, 2 to 3 times a day to pick up their deliveries. Armor cars at the bank. They’re a ll on Laredo. And as far as not being a collector road, Chapel Hill, when they pick their kids up, they come across to Laredo to bypass that intersection right in front of their school. So it is a collector road. Even the Pres ident shut it down. Laredo Drive was blocked off when he was in town. Thank you for letting me speak. Mayor Furlong: Alright. And Mr. Littfin, appreciate that. Do the improvements need to be made? Charles Littfin: Yes. You probably don’t see it right in front of the school because the City comes through every year before the parade and they patch everything. You go north of Santa Vera, it’s bad because the City doesn’t do anything up there. Come spring time, drive along and you’ll see where the curb and gutter used to be. Over the years of the buses going to the school, if there’s one that gets their early, they’ll pu ll over on Laredo and wait fo r the bus in front of them. Over the years of them doing this, they’ve probably pushed back the road 1 foot. There is no curb and gutter there now. There was. It wa s just grass to the tar. Right now there’s probably that much mud along Laredo Drive where th e tar starts and it goes to grass. You can see that in the spring. One other thing. Traffi c on Laredo. Few years back they sealcoated the frontage road in front of Lake Ann. That summ er there were hundreds of dump trucks hauling gravel to and from the north parking lot at the Chanhassen Elementary School. That’s where they stockpiled it. They brought it all the way in to town. Stockpiled it an d then they took it all the way back out to do the frontage road that goes all the way to 41. All that gravel was in that parking lot. All summer long. H undreds of dump trucks. All day long. It was terrible. So it’s not a residential road by no means. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Charles Littfin: Because everybody uses it. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Question on a, please. Thank you. Question on the width of the road, because Mr. Littfin brought that up. Paul Oehme: Real quickly. Laredo Drive. Audience: Could you pl ease talk louder? Paul Oehme: Sure. Laredo Drive in front of th e school, north of Chan View, it’s approximately what, 35, 36 feet wide. We’re not pr oposing to widen the roadway in th is area. It does meander. 19 63 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 The edge of the mat doesn’t meander so trying to straighten it out. Put the curb and gutter in there. What we’re proposing, if we need to widen it, or move it, we’re going to shift it as far to the west as we can on the school pr operty and the commercial propert ies as feasible. So in terms of ground cover, we’re not going to be, you know th e gentleman’s front yard, we’re not going to be taking any more of his sod away from him so, there’s going to be obviously construction equipment and disruption during the process bu t in terms of losing ground cover from his property, you know that’s something that we’re mindful of and we’re going to minimize as much as we can. And again we talked about the traffic issues already. Is there anything else there? Mayor Furlong: No. I think that’s what I had. Any quick follow-up’s? Otherwise we’ll keep moving here. Councilman Litsey: Just that I hope it, I mean it’s apparently not re al clear yet that the methodology’s the same with whatever designation that road has. I think in the last comment the traffic and so forth on there isn’t factored in there because you’re being assessed the same whether it’s designated as a reside ntial street or a collector street . It’s the same cost to you. I don’t know how else to better get th at point across but we keep lo sing I think item in all these talks. Todd Gerhardt: Paul, there’s one other comment re garding no parking. The school zone. I think we have that designated no parki ng during the time of loading and unloading. Is there a practice we typically use on that? Paul Oehme: On Laredo, I don’t know if it’s signed for that right now. I know that’s on street parking during special events for the school, but we do try to minimize those type of conflicts in other areas of the city. Todd Gerhardt: If it’s an issue with the nei ghborhood, maybe that’s something we can take a look at as a part of the projec t to put no parking. We’d like so me feedback from some of the affected property owners maybe in that area, if th at’s something they want to see or not see, we can look at that. Councilwoman Ernst: Paul, it keeps coming up and I keep hearing it. That Councilman Litsey’s point, when he was talking about the business owne rs versus the residents. Are you going to be addressing that later on after all the residents have had a chance to speak because obviously it’s a very important issue and I would like to hear how that benefit is going to play out. Audience: Could you speak up? Councilwoman Ernst: I just asked Paul if he wa s going to be speaking to the distribution of the assessment because that keeps coming up and Counc ilman Litsey had mentioned it as well. How is the assessment going to play out as far as th e benefit, and I think Pa ul’s going to be talking about that but I’m not quite sure. Paul Oehme: Yeah, I mean Jon Horn or I can address that. I think in your background we’ve kind of identified how the methodology was a rrived at and kind of showing what that 20 64 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 assessment, the preliminary assessment amount is ri ght now. So I mean if you want us to talk a little bit more about that, we’ll be more than wil ling to talk about the, how that was calculated but in terms of, we’re just looking for feedb ack even though, is the assessment methodology appropriate? Do we need to make some ch anges? You know those type of things so. Councilwoman Ernst: Well you know I guess I’m wondering, does it make sense to break the cost down so that the benefit plays out equally for the residents. You know so that the benefit is equal, and I guess that was, you know how does th at play out against what the businesses are paying? Paul Oehme: Yeah, again we’re, we looked at benefits for the reside ntial versus the non- residential and there’s a drawi ng showing what, you know if we w ould incorporate it. If we eliminate all the non-residential pieces here, parcel s, and replace them with single family, typical street frontage widths, parcels, that are consistent with other properties in the area, we would anticipate adding about 19 additiona l lots to that street. I mean that’s how much we think we could fit in there. Based upon those analysis, you know again we looked at several different methodologies and this was, under this scenario it would actually cost the residents more if the commercial properties were removed from the pr oject area and replaced with single family residential so. In terms of, I don’t know if th at really answers your que stion or not but you know we did look at several additional methodologies and this is the one that we kind of, we’re using at the present time so. Councilwoman Ernst: And it’s one th at we’ve used in the past. Paul Oehme: And again, the 40% assessment, back to the benefiting property owners, that’s been consistent. And we had a look at benefits for both the non-residential and the residential pieces and this is I think is assessment pr actices…that we can get for this project. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Let’s con tinue on with the public hearing now. Let’s continue with any residents along Laredo Drive. Anyone else from Laredo Drive. Good evening sir. Dave Johnson: Good evening. Thank you Mr. Ma yor, council members. My name is Dave Johnson. I live at 711 Laredo Lane and to answer your question, as I did in an email yesterday Mr. Mayor, we do think, or at l east I do and my wife does, think the improvements need to be made. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Dave Johnson: And to go ahead and set aside the question of collector or not a collect or, I think you’ve got a street here with di fferent characteristics and it’s di fficult to go ahead and fit into your existing categories. Maybe you have to fi nd another one. I don’t know, but whatever you’ve got now isn’t working real well. The proble m is not collector or n on-collector. It’s again the assessment between business ow ners and the residents, and th at’s the issue really to get anywhere. The other issue that’s related, as I mentioned before, there’s a problem with exiting 21 65 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 off of Laredo Lane onto Laredo Drive. I didn’t see anything in the plan that shows how we’re going to go ahead and address that. Mayor Furlong: Thank you and that’s specifi c to the project itse lf. Mr. Oehme, do you understand that question? Paul Oehme: Sure. We’re familiar with the i ssue here is the access point from Laredo Lane to Laredo Drive. The access point is a key inters ection right now. There’s poor sight lines, especially on the south that we’re trying to addre ss. I’ve talked with our consultant about this. We’re trying to straighten out Laredo Lane, Laredo Drive in this area as much as we can and still stay within our right-of-way. A nd then also look at keying up La redo Lane here as much as we can so we can give it better sight distance from Laredo Lane to Laredo Drive. There’s additionally several pine trees in, I think they’re in the city right-of-way that we need to look at and see if that would actually help the situati on if those were removed and replaced with some other vegetation. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Alright. So you’ll be sure to take a lo ok at that as we move forward. Paul Oehme: Yep. We’ve heard that… Mayor Furlong: Look for opportunities to improve it. Paul Oehme: …that was one of the things we wanted to address… Mayor Furlong: Very good, thank you. Anyone else for Laredo Drive at this point? Might as well continue on Laredo Lane. Anybody else on Laredo Lane? How about, go to Longview Circle. Anyone on Longview Circ le? Highland Drive. Any resi dent from Highland Drive wants to comment? Sir, please. Come on forward. Conrad Winkle: I’m Conrad Wi nkle, 505 Highland Drive. We’v e put together, went around and got a petition, there’s 8 people that live on Highland Drive, he said it’s included in this project. First the real question I have is , if they’re going to put Highland Drive in, if they should put the whole works in because all we did was pick up, I think all he did was pick up 8 people so he could pay the bill is really want it amounts to because there’s nothing wro ng with where it’s at right now. We put a petition toge ther and I brought the thing in and I think, thank you. I just wanted to make sure that you had it so you’d know. Mayor Furlong: We do and I thi nk that’s a question that we can address here this evening. Two questions. One, should the segment of Highland Dr ive that’s included in the project, why should it be included and why not the rest of Highland Drive down towards Frontier? Paul Oehme: Highland Drive, th e cul-de-sac, the portion west of Laredo Drive is proposed to be included in the project. The stre et does rate low on the pavement condition index that we have. It’s at about a 56. The area to th e east of there does rate a litt le bit higher than Laredo Drive, based upon the 2004 information that we have. We did find when we went through and televised the sewer system, we did find that there was a serv ice line that needs to be replaced and some 22 66 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 other cracking of a clay pipe that’s out there that we would like to addres s with this project as well. In terms of. Mayor Furlong: Can you hear sir? Audience: No. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Louder. Audience: You know we’re old peopl e. You have to talk louder… Paul Oehme: Alright, well again. Highl and Drive was included. I mean it’s. Audience: Why, why didn’t the, wh y isn’t the lower road included? That road is older than our cul-de-sac. Paul Oehme: It is. Audience: Yes. Paul Oehme: I think it was ’67 it was put in. Audience: You want us to he lp pay for the project. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Paul Oehme: Highland Drive on the cul-de-sac I think was built in ’69. Again it did rate lower on our pavement condition index. Highland Drive, the cul-de-sac to the west. We did not find any service issues or utility issues that we woul d like to address right now on the stretch from, of Highland Drive east of Laredo Drive so. It has to do with both the utilities. It has to do with the pavement condition. It does not in any way, shape or form have to do with paying for the project. I mean the City does pay 60% of the street improvement project. We are sticking a lot of money into a cul-de-sac. If we didn’t feel justification for you know, not putting a street in, we wouldn’t put it in based upon you know the cost to taxpayers so. Mayor Furlong: Well the cost is 60% on the st reet improvements but 100% on any of the utility work underneath. Paul Oehme: That’s correct. We do have cas t iron, the watermain that’s out here is very susceptible to breaking, especially in this climate so we have not identified any watermain breaks on Highland Drive fortunately, but we do feel that as long as we’re out here, take care of as much of the issues as we can to decrease th e amount of disruption to the neighborhood at one time so. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Anyone else from Highland Drive? Cimarron Circle? 23 67 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 George Lucas: Could you turn that on so the map is on again? I’m going to need that in a minute. Thank you very much. My name is George Lucas. I happen to live at 410 Cimarron Circle. I wasn’t really planning to make a formal presentation tonight. I just have a couple of comments. I’ve been involved in some discussi ons with some of my neighbors and some other people. I feel I represent a gentleman named La rry Anderson who happens to be in Arizona who has some feelings on this as well. He lives at 40 1 Cimarron I think his addre ss is. I’d just like to make a, if you could turn that back on so I can see the map. Laurie Hokkanen: It’s going to take just a couple minutes. I’m sorry. George Lucas: I’m sorry. One of the questions that came up in some of the discussions was on Laredo Drive itself, and I kind of need the ma p to show you this. There’s a very large percentage of the frontage that is not assessed for a number of r easons. And if she can get that up I’ll. Laurie Hokkanen: The proj ector is taking a cooling br eak so I apologize. George Lucas: I really don’t want to continue until I can do that. Laurie Hokkanen: Do you stil l have it up on your screen? Mayor Furlong: No. We’ve got, I mean we can see the map on our staff reports here. George Lucas: The issue is, if I understand correctly from discussions with Paul, is that the whole way, the property was going to be associated with the project or not associated with the project, was if the driveway accessed one of the roads. Either Laredo Drive, Laredo Lane, Cimarron Circle, Longview, a portion of Highland, etc, etc. Well as it turns out, there’s a number of properties, pretty la rge number of properties that border on Laredo that do not have access. If you can blow that up now , appreciate it. Can you get it up there? That projector’s not working. Councilman Litsey: It’s up on the other ones. Mayor Furlong: If you could put it over the X so the camera. Slide it down a little bit please. George Lucas: All these proper ties, is that showing now? Mayor Furlong: Yep. George Lucas: All these proper ties, these properties are not assessed. In addition though, all of these properties have frontage, or have drivew ays not on Laredo but on Laredo Lane. The other properties that really have drivew ays that are assessed to Laredo Dr ive itself are here, here, here, I believe here, and that’s about it so there’s a large secti on of this part that is not because all this down here and down here. The majority of this is commercial. We know that. That’s being assessed under a different formula than the reside ntial, and it’s different because the calculation, and I’m not going to go through the complex part of the calculation is based on the square 24 68 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 footage of the property over the frontage. For the residential, that’s it. For the commercial then they look at all the other frontages and make a percentage. For the residential that have multiple frontages, they don’t do that. So there’s a di fferent methodology in the way assessments are done. I think to be fair that should be the same. But all of the problems that have been discussed tonight in terms of the assessment differences in terms of all the other discussions of property use, the parking, the number of trips, on and on a nd on, basically they addr ess this part of the drive itself. They don’t address any of the cul-de -sacs. It would seem logical, and I’d like to maybe have Paul look at this. If he could look at a different formula or different way of looking at Laredo itself either down to Sa ratoga, or like Larry’d like to s ee it clear down to Highland as it was to Frontier Trail, that has all these proper ties that aren’t being assessed on it and look if there’s a different methodology there. And Paul a nd I’ve talked about this a little bit and that’s something I think he could do and that might be a reasonable way to look at how this could be done differently. I think one of the feelings that a lot of the residents f eel is that why are the resident, or the commercial prope rties have an average of $70 pe r frontage foot. The residential $82 of frontage foot. Does that seem reasonable? That’s based on the fact that they have a different assessment methodology. Not based how much they use, and I understand all that, but it’s based on a different assessment methodology. It seems like if we were to split that up into two different sections, maybe we could make a more fair allotment. That’s the first question. We don’t want stop, I don’t want to stop this project. I can’t sp eak for everyone. This project needs to be done. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. George Lucas: This portion of Laredo is pretty poor. Anyone that’s driv en down it, I mean it’s like going over a roller coaster. It doesn’t get any better. It ’s kind of fun if you like roller coasters. It does the same kind of a thing. It shouldn’t be that way and that’s because of the drainage issues. Some sub-grade issues. It wasn’t made originally to be a heavily used street but you know all these issues. So it needs to be re-d one. There’s no question. Especially this part right through here. Is it, you know you look at all this frontage that’s not assessed, it seems like there’s some other way we can do something, and I’d like to leave, le t Paul give a try at something like that. Mayor Furlong: Okay, very good. Very good. I guess the question then of which ones are in and out and they’re double front pr operties and if there’s some ot her things to look at or other ways to run, look at some of the numbers. Paul Oehme: I did have anothe r drawing up here but I want to talk a little bit about past reconstruction projects and how they kind of relate to this project a little bit. 2004 the city did reconstruct Santa Fe Trail and a portion of Del Rio and it’s about a third of a mile from Laredo Drive. Anyways there is a lot of double frontag e property on that section of roadway as well, and in terms of double frontage lo ts, and that’s shown here in blue. And when you calculate, when we calculated the benefiting property owne rs versus a double frontage lots, there was about, in this project it was about 23.4% of the frontage on th e property, on the roadway that’s being reconstructed as being double frontage or some other non-benefiting use. When we look at last year’s Koehnen project, this is a little bit harder to show on here but there’s a number of double frontage lots here as well. Along a good por tion of the roadway here too, and when we 25 69 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 looked at the benefiting properties versus the do uble frontage lots, we calculated about 25% of street frontage that had the double frontage or outlots or did not have any benefit. And then my other drawing, and I don’t know wher e that went but when we looke d at the Laredo Drive project and the areas that we just talked about, that came in right at 25% of non-benefiting or double frontage lots. The 25% that was you know either outlots or double frontage lots so what I’m trying to say is, from the past projects, I mean we ’re being consistent. It ’s right around that 25% of frontage that is, you know that’s not asse ssable. Based upon our current methodology. One thing that I do want to caveat is you know again, I think what Ge orge was getting at, Mr. Lucas, was the issue of combining the commercial assessm ent rates with the residential and is there any other clarification that we shoul d be making with, or trying to separate those two calculations out. I think that’s the crux of the issue. Mayor Furlong: Very good, thank you. Still on Cimarron Circle. Barb Murphy: My name is Barb Murphy and I’m at 404 Cimarron Circle and I do have one question. Is the post office bei ng assessed for this project? Paul Oehme: Yes. Barb Murphy: Okay. Also just in the discussion tonight I just hear about all these different ways to work the numbers and I can’t help but feel li ke I still am subsidizing the reconstruction of Laredo Lane and that’s my big objection. I still feel like our house, that our homes are going to be subsidizing Laredo, whether the methodology is leaning more towards residential or commercial. I don’t know how to work that out but th at’s just the way that I feel. I would like to just read two sentences out of the Star Tribune from January 27 th where it just backs up the deal. Where it goes back to the basis if how do we pay for our roads, and it talks about a task force that examined ways that cities funded road construction and ended up abolishing assessments. The conclusion was that roads benefited ever yone and everyone should pay, and so I also challenge the council to step back and say, do we do all these little differe nt calculations for each different road project or do we step back and maybe have a task force established and re-assess how we tackle this so that you don’t end up spending your nights listening to people complain, and you can be more consistent with how you a pply your policies. Also another question I do have is, I do support that the ro ad does need to be done. However, the curb and gutter, I know that the neighborhood did question. When the economy is getting weaker, is this the time to be assessing us and doing the curb and gutter and doing improvements that you feel are necessary? Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. I guess Mr. Oehme, in terms of the curb and gutter, the design standard that we’re reconstructi ng…if you could address that. Paul Oehme: Sure. The curb and gutter. Ou r standard street secti on does include curb and gutter. There’s several benefits for including curb and gu tter. One is drainage off your property. It does allow for better drainage for the roadwa y and it does improve the function of the roadway I think. It does help with keeping the roadwa y together. You know it ke eps the outer portion of the roadway structurally strong so it helps longev ity when we come in and potentially mill out a street in the future, it does pr ovide a benefit for future improv ements, it’s not going to cost as 26 70 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 much for those type of improvements down the road. But I think the main point I want to just get across is it does help with the drainage and help with those type of issues, especially in this neighborhood. I know Cimarron Circle, that’s a very flat road. I know they have some drainage problems on that road to begin with and that’s a perfect location for our example of why we need curb and gutter. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. I guess just anothe r question on our practice of assessing roads. Maybe just a short history of the current practic e…just a real quick hist ory Mr. Gerhardt. How long have we been doing this? Todd Gerhardt: I think we established this practice about 6 years a go. We went through an extensive study in determining how we were going to go about rec onstruction. Mill and overlays and we reviewed probably 4 or 5 different alternatives. If you did read that article on Sunday, you can see in that article that there’s not one city that does th e same thing, and I think we kind of went in the middle. This practice that we’v e been doing, I think is fa ir. It’s one where we have to show true benefit and that’s what that appraisal report that some of you have seen, and I don’t think we’d be here if we we re trying to push on a cost that we could not justify, and I think that’s the key thing here. As to the storm wa ter, everybody pays into the storm water fund and we’re picking up 100% of curb and gutter, and in this project. And it has a variety of different benefits. As Paul mentioned, it keeps the blacktop, the road into a nice square shape. It guides our plow trucks as they go along the road, and it really helps the e nvironment. With the environmental manholes. The bioswales. Storm water ponds. We pre-treat that water before it goes into our lakes and streams so it plays a very key role in th e environment so you know this practice, if you kind of look at some of the history of some previous projects like Santa Fe, this last year on Yosemite and the Koe hnen area, it’s very similar cost s for what was assessed against those, and that’s where we ta lk about this residential equi valent and I th ink we’re being consistent in how we implement this. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Anyone else from Cimarron Circle? No? I think then if I’m not mistaken, I’ve gone through those str eets which are part of the projec t so at this time I’d invite any other interested party to come forward a nd comment at the public hearing. Okay. Nobody else? Alright. With that then I’ll just make a final call. If anybody else, if I passed up your street and you heard something that you want to come back up and clarify, this would just be a final call then as part of the pub lic hearing. Yes, Mr. Lucas. George Lucas: Can I just ask one question? Mayor Furlong: Why don’t you come b ack to the microphone if you would. George Lucas: Just a question. I just heard the city manager say that curbs and gutters were not being assessed. If I read the proposal, that is part of the street cost . That is part of the 40% being assessed, unless I’m missing something. Has something changed? Paul Oehme: No. The curb and gutter I think we have included in the details…being assessed at 40 and 60%. 27 71 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Todd Gerhardt: Okay. Paul Oehme: The storm water assisted with the drain tile and the storm water piping, the manholes, those type of things, that’s 100% the city cost so. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And the reason is the curb and gutter is part of our city street standard now. Paul Oehme: Right, exactly. Todd Gerhardt: My fault. When I see storm water improvements, $389,000, city storm water fund’s picking up $400 so you threw curb into th e street improvements? Not into the. Paul Oehme: Right. Todd Gerhardt: My apology. And our practice on that, which I was a li ttle surprised that typically if you do not have cu rb on your property, we usua lly do assess for that and so appreciate the correction. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. So anybody else then that would like to speak at the public hearing on this before we get it back to council and we ask some questions and comment to move forward? Okay. If nobody else, is there a motion at this time to close the public hearing? Councilman Litsey moved, Councilwoman Ernst seconded to close the public hearing. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The public hearing was closed. Mayor Furlong: Let’s bring it b ack to council then. There may be some follow up questions that we have. Maybe we could just start with questions or clarifyi ng questions. If anybody has any. Councilman Litsey: I do have one. It was brought up here but there seems to be an inconsistency. I didn’t s ee it that way but with th e way we’re looking at co mmercial properties. If I heard you right before it talk s about if we actually parceled t hose out as residential properties they’d be paying more, or they actually are payi ng more now than if you treated it as residential property, is that correct? Paul Oehme: Well, yeah under the scenario that I presented before. They would actually be paying a little bit more if the commercial pr operties were removed and replaced with single family residential, and we calculated about 19 lots that would be, could be substituted. So under that scenario they would be paying a little bit more. Councilman Litsey: Right, okay. Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Just a couple questions from a design standpoint, and maybe this is in there. Driving through the neighborhood, some of the cul-de-sacs and the width of the cul-de-sacs, I think Mr. Oehme we talked a little bit about that. Is that someth ing you can look at? We want to 28 72 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 make sure that the width is necessary for public safety but if there’s any opportunity to narrow those in, especially at the end of the cul-de-sac. Some of those turn around’s are pretty close and closer to the homes than I think we see in our current design standa rds, or standards in terms of development so that would just be, is that some thing that you can look at? And if so, would you look at it? Paul Oehme: Yeah, definitely we’ll take a look at that. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. And then we also received some emails earlier. We didn’t get a lot of comments tonight on that but that wa s with regard to doing what we can to improve storm water management and runoff and I know you had mentioned that you’ve had some meeting with the watershed distri ct already. I assume as we move forward with, if we move forward to finalize the plans and specs we’ll look for opportu nities to build in flexibility there as well. Since we start at the top of the hill and go down to the lake so. Paul Oehme: Absolutely. Mayor Furlong: I know there’s limited opportunities there. Paul Oehme: We’re looking at every opportunity we can. We’re meeting with the watershed district regularly and their engi neers and actually their engineers are talking to Kimley-Horn and we’re, under specific plan. What we’re propo sing is…design, 6% design and such. The Watershed District’s engineer w ould have an opportunity to cri tique Kimley-Horn’s plans so, to see if there’s any other opportunities…if they don’t see them so. We’re working together on that. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Good to hear. Alright. Any other questions I gue ss at this point? If not, thoughts. Comments. Councilw oman Tjornhom, your thoughts? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Sure. Believe it or not I actually enjoy these meetings because I learn a lot and I think everyone in the room learns a lot about what ’s happening and it’s a healthy discussion to have. Tonight though I think we’re here to kind of finalize that we all agree that something needs to be done with Laredo, and I th ink everyone in the room has agreed. Or those who spoke have agreed that it is a problem that n eeds to be resolved. And so at least we can all agree on one thing tonight. So I too have ma ny questions about methodol ogies of assessments and who should pay and who shouldn’t pay and why some roads aren’t being assessed and some are, but those I think, you know there’s many more nights to come where we can really delve into those questions and get them answered and so tonight, myself, I just want to focus on should we go ahead and order the plans a nd specs for this project and so I have to agree with everybody in the room that we should go ahead. Move fo rward and keep this emo tion and then move onto the next step which is talking about assessments a nd what’s fair and what’s not fair and I am not convinced of anything so far so I think we need to have more of these discussions and really figure out what direction as a city and as a staff we should go in resolving so me of these issues. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Councilwoman Ernst. 29 73 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Councilwoman Ernst: Well I too want to thank everyone for showing up tonight. And thank you for your comments and your suggestions and even ch allenging council. I th ink that we always need to be challenging ourselves to look at different ways to do things and different methodologies. But I do support, as Councilwoman Tj ornhom said, that we need to continue to move forward. Everyone does agree to that so I too would support and moving ahead in ordering this, plans and specificati ons for the project. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. Councilman Litsey: Yeah, I agree with what’s been said. Everyone’s in agreement. As was already been stated that something needs to be done. I walk and jog along that road quite a bit. I don’t drive along it a lot but I do walk along it, but. Yeah, if it’s any cons olation, I got assessed on Big Horn Drive so, welcome to the council and here’s your assessment last year but, so I think we’re all in agreement that we need to do something. We need to move ahead. We’ve got a time table here we need to stick with so that we get this project done in a timely manner and before next winter. So we have the full benefit of the c onstruction year there as much as possible. That we can do this project. I do think that it’s, I take to heart with what has been said here. It’s very nice that people are willing to give of their time and come here to express their opinions and I do appreciate that too. I do think that this project consisted with past practices. A methodology in terms of what the City picks up in terms with what the residents pick up is kind of a larger question in terms of past practices and probably won’t be settled for this project if there’s a movement afoot that the residents would like to see that changed. But I think we still have time to take a look at like how the commer cial properties are assesse d and keep working at that and keep the dialogue open and hopefully that will be resolved too. Not necessarily to everyone’s satisfaction but at leas t knowing that we’ve looked long a nd hard at that and that we take to heart what you’ve said so. But tonigh t I too support moving ahead and getting the project going. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. I’l l reiterate the than ks to everybody that came not only this evening and I know it’s not always easy to stand up under the lights with the camera going and talk but for everyone that did, and even for t hose that didn’t tonight but came to the public meetings, the open houses to express their concerns and send us emails, all that is helpful and it, for myself I know and the other council members, it causes us to really look behind just what’s being on the surface presented, and make sure wh at, it’s being done for the right reasons and ultimately that’s what I try to look at each and every time as something’s questioned is, when I listen to the issue, is the proposal being done fo r the right reasons, and not for the wrong reasons, as some people suggested it might be here tonight. To the question of does this project, and this entire area need to be done. I think Councilwoman Tjornhom sai d, if there’s anything that we can all agree on in this room it’s probably that, and I would include some of these other roads as well as Laredo Drive. The ones that are included in the project, is that they need to be done. Between the surface condition of the street a nd what we’re hearing from our engineering department in terms of the poor condition of the utilities underneath the street, those need to be improved. Just there’s capacity issues. We can’t do the entire city and everything that needs to be done. This project has been on our schedule to do since we put toge ther a long range plan back I want to say probably about 5 years ago or so where we started looking out ahead so people can see when their area, when their nei ghborhood might be scheduled for some of these 30 74 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 types of improvements so people can get ready a nd plan and ultimately be involved, as many of you are. So in terms of should we move forwar d tonight ordering the plans and specifications, I think the answer there is simply yes. In term s of the assessments, we will have time to review that. I think staff picked up some ideas tonigh t and clearly all of us, the concerns, and I know that they’re going to spend time and we will spen d time with them taking a look and making sure that methodology we use is fair. And by fair, it has to be fair to those property owners that are associated with the project and benefiting from the project and it’s got to be fair to the taxpayers. It’s got to be consistent, not onl y with past practices but with st ate statute, and it needs to be done I believe in an objective, logical manner. It ’s something that should be consistent and be able to be applied consistently going forward as well as looking back so, we’re not done on that side of the equation and that’s fine because we don’t need to do that. One of the things that didn’t come up tonight, or I think it did. Mr. Horn mentioned that last ye ar when we went out for some projects, we received very favorable bids on that and that we’ve attributed historically to the slow housing market. One of the questio ns came up, doing it now versus doing it later. Right now, and last year we saw that there we re a number of construction companies, because they weren’t being hired to put in new developm ents around the area, they were very interested on working on public street projects, and that’s an other reason to move forward now to get out there and get those bids so that whatever the cost is, and ag ain from our allocation methodology and assessment, it’s a percentage of the overall cost. So it’s not this number and then if there’s, if the bids come in less, everybody does benefit. It’s not that the city be nefits and the residents don’t. Clearly that wouldn’t be fair. So I think we have some work to do there, and we have to relook at them. Make sure that what we’re doi ng from an assessment is fair to the parties involved. To the other taxpayers. It’s consistent . It’s objective and l ogical and it’s something that we’re doing for the right reasons. And then the result s should be, may not be what everybody wants or would like to see but at least we’ll all know how we got there and that’s what we’re looking for. So I think moving forwar d with the project makes sense. Unless there’s any, is there any other comments or follow-up at this point? If not, there’s a resolution here that’s been distributed with regard to this pr oject for ordering the plans and specifications as requested tonight. Is there a motion to adopt this resolution that’s been distributed? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Motion to a dopt the resolution as distributed. Mayor Furlong: Thank y ou. Is there a second? Councilman Litsey: Second. Mayor Furlong: Made and seconded. Any final, I’m sorry Mr. Gerhardt. Todd Gerhardt: One minor modification to that resolution. Roger Knutson, City Attorney suggest that we cross out counc il resolution adopted January 28 th and say ordered as proposed in the feasibility study. Mayor Furlong: Okay, we’ll make those amendments to this resolution. I’m sure that’s okay to the maker and to the seconder? Councilwoman Tjornhom: Yeah. 31 75 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 Councilman Litsey: Yep. Councilwoman Ernst: Mayor just to make sense that they know what the re solution is. I mean it talks about moving fo rward but reviewing. Mayor Furlong: The resolution states, and I didn’t write down the propos ed changes here but it states such improvement is necessary, cost effectiv e and feasible. It’s hereby ordered, and this is where I think is it the second bullet point? Mayor Furlong: Proposed in the feasibility report. Mayor Furlong: Proposed in the feasibility report and that we approve the feasibility study and authorize Kimley-Horn and Associat es as the engineer of the proj ect. To prepare the plans and specifications for the 2008 street improvement proj ect. So then just for clarification, those I think on the schedule then, once th e plans are finalized they’ll co me back to the council for approval of those plans and authorization to go out for bid, and that will be done within a matter of I think 2 more council mee tings, is that correct? Councilwoman Tjornhom: 25 th I think. Mayor Furlong: Okay. Now that generally is mo re of an administrative process. That’s not going to, there’s no public h earing associated with that, if I’m correct. Paul Oehme: If we find some big discrepancy between the feasibility study and the final plans and specs, that’s a time we bring that informa tion before you and see when you consider moving the project forward. Mayor Furlong: Okay, but generally if the fina l plans and specification process reaffirms what was anticipated in the feasibility study, that will come back likely as part of our consent agenda items, is that correct? Paul Oehme: Correct. Mayor Furlong: Okay. And so the next time this will come back from a public hearing standpoint is after we get the bids back in. We know what the project costs will be. We will have had an opportunity to look at some altern atives for the assessment and then we’d be considering authorizing the projec t and adopting the assessment roll at that time, is that correct? Paul Oehme: Yes. Mayor Furlong: Okay, thank you. With that, we have a motion to adopt the resolution. It’s been seconded. Any other discussion? Resolution #2008-08: Councilwoman Tjornhom moved, Councilman Litsey seconded that the City Council adopt a resolution, (amende d to delete the phrase council resolution 32 76 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 adopted January 28 th and replace with ordered as prop osed in the feasibility study), ordering the preparation of plans and specifi cations for City Project 08-01. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0. Mayor Furlong: Why don’t we, given the hour, w hy don’t we take just a short recess and we’ll come back at the call of the Chair. Thank you. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS: PRESENTA TION OF MAPLE LEAF AWARD TO CRAIG PETERSON. Mayor Furlong: It is my pleasure, bitterswee t but still my pleasure to recognize Craig Peterson for his outstanding service and dedi cation to the City of Chanhasse n these last 12 years. Craig has devoted a great deal of his time and talents to this city which includes being on the Planning Commission from 1995 to ’99 and serving as Chair for the last 3 of those years. Being on our Economic Development Authority from the year 2000 to 2007. Southwest Transit Commission from 2002 to 2007, and serving as it’s Chair from 2004 to 2007. And two terms on the City Council, from December, 2000 to December, 2007. Th ings that stand out most about Craig and his excellent leadership skills, his commitment to what, to do what it takes to get the job done. He has been a leader by example. Always prepar ed for our meetings. Constantly tries to raise the bar by providing thoughts and ideas that enhance the process and the project. Because of his efforts and work ethic, he has earned the respect of City Council, commission members, residents, businesses and staff. During his term on the City Council Craig provided leadership on many projects and policies. The results of which have been demonstrated by Money Magazine’s naming of Chanhassen as one of th e Best Places to Live in 2005 and by Family Circle Magazine designating Cha nhassen as one of the Top Ten Towns to Raise a Family in 2007. Craig has been involved in many projects over the years for which he should be very proud. Construction of Highway 212 and 101 gap project, the new library, numerous developments and redevelopments throughout the town, development of our city’s first water treatment plant, miles of new and constructed roads, trails, parks throughout the community, leadership that created fiscal policies that impr oved our city’s financial value, and in the end resulted in 4% reductions in city’s tax rate over these last 5 year s. Craig, your leadership, service and dedication to Chanhassen has been remarkable. We thank you for that. You have to know that you did make a difference during that time and that is key. I know that’s important, but it’s important to us. You have touched many lives and many of whom, they know about it and many may not but rest assured they all… Thank you. What I just presented Craig too is our Maple Leaf Award. Let me just read that quickly. Pr esented to Craig Peterson…years of service on the City Council, the Economic Development Au thority, the Planning Commission, Southwest Transit. It states in recogn ition of outstanding service and de dication to the community by the Chanhassen City Council and the residents of th e city themselves. Thank you very much. Craig Peterson: I won’t do what Roger does an d go into the mic like this. You know I think that number one, I certainly thank you for this and those comments that I don’t think I can live up to. I certainly participated and happened to be sitting in the chair wh en those things happened and certainly staff was the primary driver of th e things mentioned and I absolutely am proud to have worked with the staff that the city has a nd I will remember that for a long time. The word honor I think is used by politicians a lot. Perhaps over used, but I was thinking in the drive over 33 77 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 today that there isn’t a better wo rd. There just simply isn’t. Honor to serve the public is something that few people have the opportunity to do, and I think that my goal was always to approach it that it was an honor and a privileg e and hopefully at the end of the day when the public looks at what we had done and what I ha d done, that when they look at that, they will think that I did make a difference Tom, and you know what that phrase means to me. A number of years ago I was walking by a construction site in a city, not dissim ilar to the city of Chanhassen and I was watching, I wanted to know wh at they were doing. There were 3 guys in a row and I went up to the first one and I said, excuse me sir but what are you doing? And the guy said I’m laying bricks. You know that didn’t really help me very much, you know. And so I went up to the next guy. Tapped him on the shoul der. Excuse me sir but what are you doing? Well I’m building a wall. He still didn’t help. I went up to the third person and tapped him on the shoulder and he turned to me and smiled and he said, I asked him the same question. What are you doing? And he smiled and said, I’m building a cathedral. In many ways what you are doing this evening, and what I did for 12 or some years is build a cath edral, and I think the challenge that I want to leave you and those that will come after you tonight, is that always remember that you’re building a city. You’re not sitting through an assess ment hearing. You’re not making a variance. You’re building a city and I think that’s what I tr ied to do, keep in the back of my mind and sometimes it’s hard. Y ou know like tonight, it was hard. But you know what I strive for and what I set the challenge to you and others is to remember that you’re building a city and let the public judge whether you made a differe nce and that’s what I’ll wait, you know as I drive home, I’ll think about the word make a difference and hopefully I have. So with that, thank you very much. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Other thoughts and comments. Councilwoman Tjornhom: The Mayor said I have more than 5 minutes. It’s not on record so, and I want to first say that Craig I think you were kind of gyppe d tonight because of your 12 years experience and your whole resume that took the mayor more than 5 minutes to recite, I think instead of just a single maple leaf award, they should have given you the whole tree, but I guess you know that’s my perception of the whole thing but. One of the first memories I have of you and I together was our, me running for office fo r the first time and it was my first debate and I was shaking in my shoes and we were sitting next to each other and I had this statement prepared and I was thinking oh, and you were firs t of course and you were so eloquently were speaking and the first thing you sa id is well, I don’t have an ything prepared because I don’t believe in having prepared statements for thes e debates and I will neve r vote for anybody who does. And so of course there I have my prepar ed statement and I proceeded to read it and I don’t know if you voted for me or not. And that I think was the kick-off of you really being my mentor and really respecting what you had to sa y and we got to be friends. You know we had council in common and we have something else that we both love to cook. And so I was kind of comparing the two and what they kind of meant t ogether and you and I both know that we can go to the store and buy a cook book. We can watch s hows on it. It doesn’t make you a good cook. You know you have to have a heart and a soul and the passion and the instinct to really do that well, and I think that’s the same thing with bein g an elected official. Is that you can read books about how to be a good speaker. How you can ma ke good public policy. You know how to be a good council member. You’ve got seminars on it, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re going to be successful, and Crai g, I don’t think you needed book. I don’t think you need a 34 78 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 seminar. You just had that instinct and that passion and that will to be a public servant, and you really were and you’ve taught me so many thi ngs. I probably need to go buy some more books, but you really were a mentor to me and this isn’t good bye. I think the glass is half full. You are leaving us and going on to a better place where you can be a voice for us in Carver County. Councilman Litsey: That di dn’t sound good. I’m sorry. Mayor Furlong: Different place. Councilman Litsey: I’m sorry. Councilwoman Tjornhom: But really I mean, we need that representati on that you had for our citizens here in Chanhassen, to be moved onto th at next level at the Met Council and so I am thrilled you’re going. I’m sad you’ll be gone. Bu t I always know we have Monday nights. I’m sure you’ll be sitting with your wonderful dinne r you prepared and watching us on television so I’ll have to have a signal or something to say hello. Craig Peterson: You don’t want to k now what I had for dinner then. Councilwoman Tjornhom: So thank you Craig. Craig Peterson: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Vicki. Councilwoman Ernst: Well I was not prepared. I didn’t know that I was going to be speaking tonight. Craig Peterson: I was hoping nobody would so we’re in the same boat Vicki. Councilwoman Ernst: But I’ve always been a wo man of very few words, but I will try and express my appreciation for what you’ve done, you’ve always been there for me and I want to thank you number one. It was very, a rewardi ng experience to serve with you on the Southwest Transit Commission. I saw you in action there. I saw you in action here at the City Council, and you are a man I’ve always respected and will continue to respect. You’re a teacher to me and I really want to thank you for everything that you’ve done for me, as well as the city of Chanhassen and as well as Southwest Trans it Commission and congratulations on your new appointment and I’m excited to see how you’ll grow in this, in your new endeavors and best of luck to you. Craig Peterson: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Councilman Litsey, thoughts. Councilman Litsey: Yes, echo some of the things that have alr eady been said but, and I haven’t had the opportunity to know you quite as long as some up on the council but having said that, in 35 79 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 the year that I have gotten to know you well on the council, you’ve been just a terrific mentor. You’ve provided me with some guidance and you’ve tempered some things at times that perhaps I’m better off for for having listened and watche d you in action. A lot of your mentoring was just watching how you handled situations and dealt with them. Thoughtfully. Some of the comments you made in your remarks, I’ve taken to heart because I’ve seen you do that in practice. It’s not just what you say, it’s what you do. To me that distinguishes the people that, the difference between people that are just there for other reasons and the people that are there truly to serve and you’re one of those that’s here to truly serv e and so I thank you for that. From the very beginning you’ve been very. Excuse me. Craig Peterson: I’m the one th at’s supposed to be choking. Councilman Litsey: From the very beginning you’ve , like I said, you’ve been a terrific mentor and I really do appreciate that. I’m going to miss you a lot on the council, I already do, but having said that, you are off to hopefully bigger and better things. That you can carry on the legacy you left with the city wi th the Metropolitan Council and do ev en bigger and better things. More regionally, which will have impact, still have an impact on Chanhassen obviously, and it’s going to be nice to have you there. So thank you. For your service to the city. For what you’ve done for me and stay in touch obviously and keep up the good work on the Met Council. Craig Peterson: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: Mr. Gerhardt. Todd Gerhardt: Well what can I say? On behalf of all of city staff, I think you used the one word I think that we, I think would all agree with is that it’s b een our honor to work with you. Your leadership. Your directi on. I think you always used the word, leave your finger prints on projects throughout the town and we definitely see a lot of th at as I drive around town, seeing your direction and leadership to staff. On th e library. On commercial businesses. Trying to always improve the architectural style of residential or commercia l businesses here in town and I really appreciate your guidance over the last 7 years on the City C ouncil. 12 years on the Planning Commission. You’re definitely seeing your finger prints all over this town and we really appreciate you challenging us to make Ch anhassen a great community to live in and thank you. Craig Peterson: Thank you. Mayor Furlong: I’ll just fini sh briefly. Craig you’ve been a friend and a confidant and I appreciate that. Not only the opportunity to work together but our friendship that has developed during that time. I’ve always appreciate d your vision, your strategic thinking and your dedication. Not just to get things done, which is important, but to get them done well, which is equally important, and we’ve done that and you’ve been a big pa rt of that. Todd mentioned, it has been an honor. It is an honor. Continues to be a honor to work with you and be proud because you did serve honorably and we appreciate that. Thank you for that as well. Craig Peterson: Until we meet again. 36 80 City Council Meeting - January 28, 2008 37 Mayor Furlong: Very good. Thank you. Anything el se for council presentations this evening? ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS: Todd Gerhardt: Nothing this even ing. We had a work session item that we were talking about strategic planning. Go through that list one mo re time. If you have any questions, why don’t you give me a call here in the next 2 weeks. We’ll schedule it for our first meeting in February. I don’t think we’re going to lose any time on that . Also, have an opening for City Council so with Craig’s departure we are advertising in th e Villager again. The closing for the council seat is this Thursday at 4:30 so anybody viewing this, we’re looking for great applicants like Craig Peterson to serve in his vacancy for one year so go to our web site. There is an application there and also a little job desc ription so anybody intereste d, go to our web site. Mayor Furlong: Thank you. Any questions for Mr. Gerhardt? CORRESPONDENCE DISCUSSION. None. Councilwoman Ernst moved, Councilwoman Tjornhom seconded to adjourn the meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried una nimously with a vote of 4 to 0. The City Council meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Submitted by Todd Gerhardt City Manager Prepared by Nann Opheim 81 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 15 2008 Chairman McDonald called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m MEMBERS PRESENT Jerry McDonald Kurt Papke Kathleen Thomas Debbie Larson and Mark Undestad MEMBERS ABSENT Dan Keefe and Kevin Dillon STAFF PRESENT Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Bob Generous Senior Planner Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer and Terry Jeffrey Water Resources Coordinator COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL Kate Aanenson reviewed proposed changes for Chapters 1 through 3 In discussing specific land use changes Chairman McDonald asked about the impact of taxes on development Commissioner Papke asked about the rationale for not allowing retail on Parcel 14 Bob Generous reviewed Chapters 4 through 10 Chairman McDonald asked for clarification on how the city will implement the goals outlined for natural resources and why the capital improvement program is included in the comprehensive plan Commissioner Papke asked staff to comment on the land use chapter and the apparent shift away from residential to commercial After discussion and comments the following motion was made Undestad moved Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as modified with revisions to Chapter 7 Transportation to designate Dell Road from Highway 5 north to the city limit as a major collector and Dell Road from Highway 5 south to the city limit as a B Minor Arterial and the minor collector narrative shall include Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 101 to the east city limits Sanitary sewer Chapter 8 to incorporate language regarding the reason for the changes to the MUSA phasing plan Chapter 9 Water to incorporate additional language on water conservation and Capital Improvements Chapter 10 incorporating the revised CIP Table and authorize submittal of the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0 PUBLIC HEARING MS4 PERMIT NONDEGRADATION REPORT AND REVISIONS TO THE CITY S STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM Public Present Name Address Mary Borns 7199 Frontier Trail 82 Planning Commission Summary January 15 2008 Name Address Steve Donen 7341 Frontier Trail Diane Spencer Wenek Associates Terry Jeffery introduced himself to the commission as the new Water Resources Coordinator before presenting the staff report on this item along with Diane Spencer from Wenek Associates who reviewed the specifics of the report Commissioner Papke asked about the enforcement authority Chairman McDonald questioned the need for this report Commissioner Larson asked for clarification of the term reforestation Chairman McDonald opened the public hearing Steve Donen 7341 Frontier Trail explained how and why the city needs to work on the issue of infiltration and how Lotus Lake will be addressing this idea in the future Chairman McDonald closed the public hearing Papke moved Undestad seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the distribution of the Nondegradation Assessment to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in compliance with the NPDES Phase II permit as revised June 1 2006 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0 PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP SNAP FITNESS REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A 50 000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD LOCATED AT 2411 GALPIN COURT LOT 1 BLOCK 2 CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK APPLICANT EDEN TRACE CORP PLANNING CASE 07 27 Mark Undestad excused himself from the meeting due to a conflict of interest Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item Commissioner Larson asked about placement of the walking trail Commissioner Papke asked for clarification of the landscaping plan and the view of the building from the road Chairman McDonald opened the public hearing No one spoke and the public hearing was closed Thomas moved Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves Planning Case 07 27 approving a site plan for a 50 000 square foot one story office warehouse building plans prepared by Houwman Architects dated November 06 2007 subject to the following conditions 1 The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system 2 The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota 3 The plan must be revised to meet the 50 foot setback from the property line on Galpin Boulevard to the parking lot 2 83 Planning Commission Summary January 15 2008 4 Site lighting shall be revised to incorporate high pressure sodium vapor lamps 5 Architectural lighting shall be down cast only 6 Two upper level windows shall be added on the west end of the south building elevation 7 A column shall be added in the middle of the north building elevation 8 The developer shall provide a pedestrian connection from the site to Lyman Boulevard 9 The proposed sidewalk shall not be located within the existing group of protected trees The sidewalk shall be located either north or south of this area with City approval 10 Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs for trail and sidewalk connections 11 All plantings along Galpin Boulevard shall be field located so as to not damage existing trees No trees or shrubs shall be planted within the protected area of trees without City approval 12 All trees shown as preserved on plans dated 09 16 07 shall be protected by tree protection fencing before any construction activities begin Any trees killed or damaged shall be replaced at a rate of 2 1 diameter inches 13 Shrub quantities shall be increased to meet minimum requirements for bufferyard plantings 14 Wood chip mulch shall be used around trees in all landscape peninsulas in place of sod or rocks 15 Applicant must comply with the following Fire Prevention policies a 40 1995 Fire Sprinkler requirements b 07 1991 Pre fire plan drawings c 29 1991 Premises identification d 34 1993 Water service installation e 36 1994 Combination Fire Domestic water service line Combustible Storage and High Pile Combustible Storage 16 Applicant must fill out the form 17 No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed Trees and scrubs must either be removed from site or chipped 18 A 10 foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants 19 The park fees payable with the building permit shall be 42 416 00 3 84 Planning Commission Summary January 15 2008 20 Sheet C1 shall be amended to show inlet protections on all existing storm sewer inlets 21 Sheet C1 shall be amended to extend the erosion control blanket in the northeast corner of the lot to cover all soil until the proposed grading matches the existing grade 22 Sheet C4 item 2 shall be amended to insert the construction of rain gardens as item 11 in the sequencing of construction activities and inspect site shall be amended so that it is 12 in the sequence 23 Sheet C4 item 5 1 shall have language added to the effect that the SWPPP all amendments and the NPDES permit shall be kept on site in a readily accessible location known to all relevant individuals 24 Sheet L1 the rain gardens shall be designed so that water runoff from the parking area will travel through some form of filter BMP 25 The rain gardens shall be designed to drain within 48 hours and not be inundated to a depth greater than one foot during a 10 year storm event Calculations need to be provided supporting this 26 The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies and comply with their conditions of approval 27 The complete existing contours must be shown on the east side of the property 28 The proposed contours must tie into the existing contours shown on the plan 29 Retaining walls four feet high or higher require a building permit and must be designed by an engineer registered in the State of Minnesota 30 Eight inch watermain must be looped around the building This watermain shall be privately owned and maintained 31 A cross access agreement must be dedicated and a copy provided to the City before the building permit is issued All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Thomas noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 4 2007 as presented COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS None Chairman McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 9 50 p m Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 4 85 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 15 2008 Chairman McDonald called the meeting to order at 7 00 p m MEMBERS PRESENT Jerry McDonald Kurt Papke Kathleen Thomas Debbie Larson and Mark Undestad MEMBERS ABSENT Dan Keefe and Kevin Dillon STAFF PRESENT Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Bob Generous Senior Planner Alyson Fauske Assistant City Engineer and Terry Jeffrey Water Resources Coordinator COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL Public Present Name Address William Thibault 11712 Wayzata Boulevard Aanenson and the narrowness of that for residential and to get driveways in there As you heard from Mr Gowen he s interested in the medium density but he s not sure what his time frame is So what we re stating there is that the challenge on this is to get something that makes a good transition then office building and that would be through design standards How we look at the buffering Noise attenuation Those sort of things to make that a good use so we are still recommending that that remain office We just want to respond to the comments that were raised by the neighbors there Any questions on that one Then we ll move to the next one This piece we recommended the office zoning on this piece Maybe you could slip Bob right to the next one too The applicants proposed and this entire packet and our response there s a lot more dialogue in the staff report They presented a proposal that showed retail commercial and wanted to consider retail at this intersection They felt that that was desirable We had some concerns on that north side We talked about doing it giving the office zoning on that south side Again as that transitional use With the premise that the green space be preserved on that north side increasing the ponding We had some concerns about traffic generation Access and those sort of things so we are still recommending that that stay office again and the applicant would like to see that mixed use or dual guiding on that piece but we re recommending that we are up zoning it because it is currently zoned residential so our recommendation does up zone it but not to the level and extent that the developer and again the entire in your Chapter 2 attachments the entire response The entire proposal from the applicant and staff s responses in there Commercial pieces Parcel 33 34 and 36 The piece that we ve identified as the Fox Fox Family and the Dorsey parcels We had recommended a dual guiding on that property This is a piece of property that we had potentially considered the regional mall and we ve also dual guided that as pure office Again the rationale for that is if for some reason the regional mall or 86 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 whatever however we define that mall was to come about that we have the dual guiding There was a lot of discussion You heard we handed out last time Maxfield Research had said the concern about the downtown We also had the Chamber supported the commercial itself We did attach emails from residents that a significant amount that were in favor of that and some that were still had some the concerns about that Again the staff s position on that is that is a zoning district we will be creating if that s the direction the City Council wants to go and you will see that zoning district and how that operates Again the goal of that is to provide the bulk height How that s going to look Articulation and then some of the other things that we desire We talked about lead construction Energy efficient Those sort of things that we would talk about for the mall itself but again we re satisfied that if it doesn t become that use that a pure office zoning would work for that Any questions on that one Then the next one there should be an area map there somewhere This is the Erhart piece This piece is currently zoned residential The staff did recommend a pure office zoning of 12 acres right at adjacent to Powers Boulevard and the City does have a lift station going there We did hire a consultant to look at a land use but so did the applicant and I ll just briefly touch on those just to make sure that that s back in the record They presented I know it s a little hard to see that last time We had some problems getting the disk into the computer system so this is the applicant s proposal to consider actually having dual guiding so it d be residential and or the pure office zoning on that so it d be significant you see where the residential is One of the other issues that was raised and I had I believe that s up there The tax comparison I ll try to zoom in that real quick too This was an issue that was raised at the meeting So that we looked at we actually had the city s financial consultants Ehlers and Associates review the difference So this would be if it was office retail a comparison If it was to be office retail you can look at the comparisons So what would the City s there s 3 options there If you looked at Option 1 if you can follow on the top box Option 1 would be 45 acres of office With surface parking Option 2 would be with a ramp Then 3 would be retail Retail with a ramp And then 40 acre business park and 40 acres commercial So if you followed down the next box generates what the local tax would be so clearly if it was high end office with a ramp parking it s going to generate the highest percentage of property tax Now we also did a comparison showing the different potentials for if it was residential Go ahead and flip that And again this was in your packet So we looked at the 4 options there One being 80 units of single family again with the different market value depending on the price points 80 units of single family 240 townhouses and 640 of apartments so again you can see the following under the second box property tax estimates You could see the potential tax revenue there So if you look back at the high end office with the parking ramp clearly that generates the greatest percentage or portion of local taxes Again the point that we re raising in here we certainly accept that as an option and that s one of the factors of looking at land uses If you go back to our original chart we did recommend that we re increasing 200 acres of office zoning We re creating that What we don t know here is the potential for the what s going to happen on the other side of the street That could be more office if the mall didn t go through This is the proposal let me back out This is the proposal that the staff had done looking at this site itself and using that 12 acres This is Powers Boulevard The interchange We do have a city owns property in that area and the city park that s identified there It says park and the preserved land would be working through that making that connection with trails So again the applicant would like to see the option of having that dual guided which would allow for residential or the pure office zoning 2 87 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 At this point in time the staff again is recommending the original proposal which would be just the 12 acres adjacent to the Powers Boulevard Any questions on that one McDonald Anybody have any questions I ve got a couple questions for you in this particular area The first one is for one of the first times we re beginning to kind of look at what s the impact of taxes on development Is there a way a mechanism to put this into use as we go forward with making decisions and everything about property and it s use Aanenson Yeah and we have done that We did it on Liberty on Bluff Creek We looked at the tax consequences there I think we have to always step back and say if we re going to say we re always going to go with that we wouldn t do maybe something some affordable housing project We have to put that in context in the entire mix and we re confident the mix that we re recommending is the responsible way to go by way of increasing that amount of commercial and the amount of and I m talking about the entire land use in the city into the future and increasing the pure office So if you notice the one that we did reduce was office industrial and Bob s got that chart So if you look at what where we are trying to increase is more in that pure office zone which we do have a lot of is the office showroom And so we re trying to attract that higher end office McDonald Okay And then one of the other questions I ve got on your recommendation here what the applicant was actually looking for is the dual zoning that we ve done for across the street because we re just not sure what s going to happen We re trying to keep all our options open Why wouldn t we want to extend the same thing to the east because of the proximity of that landing because a lot of what happens across the street is probably going to determine what happens to the east Aanenson Sure That was based on the input that we had from the neighborhood meetings There really wasn t full disclosure on this because this came up later As we had all the open houses and received comments we did have another neighborhood meeting We really didn t have a in staff s opinion an opportunity to gather input When you have existing stub streets into this area the development pattern here is different than the across on Powers Boulevard Those people were apprised in that neighborhood that we were considering changing that We have existing prevailing development patterns that are different So that would be the rationale for that And this has been guided with existing homes around it for a long time for residential McDonald Okay Because of it s proximity to the large lots which are already Aanenson Exactly McDonald In that particular area Aanenson Exactly Exactly McDonald Okay 3 88 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Aanenson Alright And then we ll move on to just maybe you just want to put up Bob the big map with the colors The 60 numbered lots Thank you And I just wanted to mention a couple other ones that came up This wasn t identified but we had somebody if you just want to point to that site on the Klein piece The Brighton Corporation s just a little bit further north of that That one that was Mike Wardle Brighton Corporation out of Boise Idaho spoke at the meeting and did want to get on the record that they would like to see commercial zoning That wasn t one that we had identified to rezone and wanted to get on the record stating and you will be seeing that probably within a month We haven t received the application but we anticipate that one coming in We re not sure when it comes in if it will be complete but that one should be submitted here shortly But they did want to get on the record again the staff did not support that rezoning And then we also received an email from Mr Halla Want to point to that site That 46 Mr Halla did request that he would like to see some strip mall some convenient commercial high rise on that property Staff does not support that and we ve got commercial which we think we talked about a potential convenience commercial but not in this area We kind of looked at that when we did that larger commercial study and if we incorporated that into 41 again we want to embed that in similar to what we did over on Highway 41 It wouldn t be a free standing commercial center but embedded into an office park where you re supporting those pieces there So it s not so loud and bright in that area but we would not support it on the Halla site and that would be our recommendation on that Any other questions on land use McDonald Could I ask you a question Is this I wasn t quite sure where this is Corner of Pioneer Trail and 101 That s currently where his golf course is Aanenson That s correct McDonald So what he s talking about is a redevelopment of the golf course area Aanenson Correct Well from the way the letter reads it s in your packet he thought he could still do some of that and operate the golf course McDonald Okay Thank you I just wanted clarification where it was at Aanenson Alright Moving along then On Chapter 3 which is the historic preservation I m going to turn this off because now I don t have the maps with that one McDonald If I could interrupt you for just a second Okay since we just finished Chapter 2 I d like to give any of the commissioners an opportunity if in general over land use if there was anything you feel wasn t covered or any comments you want to make about Chapter 2 Papke I guess I have just one observation or comment on the Parcel number 14 The one on th 78 there Compared to the small strip that we have at Century Boulevard which seems to be struggling a bit this corner seems to be quite successful The Kwik Mart is very successful At least antidotal evidence says every time I go by there there s a lot of business going on there and the ones on Century are struggling and I guess conceptually I m struggling a little bit with this You know I understand the rationale for saying you know no retail on there at all but it almost seems like because there s kind of critical mass at that corner already If they want to do a little 4 89 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 bit more across the street is that really so bad I guess I m struggling with the down side of allowing a small amount of retail since we already have a very successful corner there Aanenson That s right That s a great question The staff s position on that is we may have been premature on that across on Century Now Lifetime is open we ve got 400 employees out there who are using that end of the What we ve talked about with the office if they came in if they did some support within the office we talked about that but we think one of the goals that we ve really tried hard to do is not have strip commercial up and down Highway 5 We think we ve been successful We think if there s other offices to support that we would look at that So what was our position on that I know they re interested in doing a bank and we you know would do something creative on that but we didn t want to give the pure office and have that be larger and kind of those businesses that made an investment on the other piece Because now that we ve got the rest of that industrial park up and running and potentially the other building at Lifetime we think that creates a lot more energy down there for the gas station too McDonald Let me do a follow up on that because in the beginning when I started on the commission one of the things we had or the way land was zoned as far as industrial use is developers came in The market drove us towards residential We changed our approach on a number of areas because that s who wanted to do something What mechanisms do we have in place Are we locking ourselves in by zoning it office only and development comes in and again the market drives us towards something else Aanenson The difference is really if you go through the comprehensive plan we rezone the property If they come through separately anybody can ask for rezoning at any time That s their right They process the application so it doesn t preclude them And I think the challenge here is you know it s easier to go this way instead of to get a land use rezoning takes a majority of the council So it takes 4 5ths It s a little bit more complicated because it should be more thoughtful So to come through this process and get it done that s done for you then you just come through and you re consistent with it So what we re saying is we want to make sure that same with Mr Erhart so there s more thoughtful consideration and then we give more due diligence to those issues that we didn t spend that much time studying And if you read through we had a lot of issues with the retail and that was the dialogue going back and forth that s been going on a for a number of years that we didn t support that much retail at that intersection It s a significant amount looking at what we have for some of those neighborhood cores and that was our concern is the amount of So could he get either or Yes Can you say no It s if it s one or the other Yes you can but I think again it takes a little bit more review input to change it McDonald Okay I guess what it comes down to it s the same process we went through before where again we looked at it We made evaluations based upon what was being presented to us We made a decision Aanenson Correct 5 90 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 McDonald So no one is actually foreclosed from doing anything If they ve got a good plan that s thoughtful and again if the market s what it is we do want to see land developed and we will consider things Aanenson Yeah you re correct Mr Chair and again I think the other reason for some of the people like Mr Wardle to get on from the Brighton Corporation to get on the record saying so you can come back and say well why didn t you come before They re raising this as an issue to say we believe that the staff s recommendation is flawed so they re on the record stating that so when they come back through we still have that same dialogue McDonald Okay I maybe apologize a little bit for holding this up but this I think is probably the key chapter in the whole comprehensive plan and I do want to make sure that we ve given the public enough I think opportunity to think about this and come forward and they ve given us some good ideas I just want to make sure that in going through this that we do as a commission make some comments to this and give you some more feedback so I appreciate you Aanenson Yeah and I think this is very appropriate to have this dialogue and again similar to what we did on that other site the one I just mentioned on 101 and Lyman this was never noticed in the public hearings as potential retail site so when we had our open houses there wasn t that same neighborhood review of that so I just want to make sure that we ve done our due diligence Let the neighbors to give them a fair shake at well I didn t know You did have some neighbors show up at the last meeting but I m not sure that they ve had the same review McDonald Okay You want to go onto Chapter 3 I believe we ve done with Chapter 2 Chapter 3 then Aanenson Chapter 2 was excuse me Chapter 3 Historic Preservation This was one that the Planning Commission had some concerns about Are we doing enough in this chapter Again our goal is to partner with the County and being the lead in that They are doing the data collection for historic and cultural resources so we want to partner with them We will be again we ve got the goal in the comprehensive plan and our city ordinances where we ll be putting some of that mechanism to make that happen and that s where your concern is We didn t see that How do we know that s going to happen and that s when I say to you our next project after this will be coming back with a more specific implementation of those So your question of what s the City s role I think we need to put more teeth in that That will be through the ordinance itself And we had a meeting with the County on this issue We have scheduled this for a work session to tour some buildings to talk about that in more detail so we certainly understand your level of concern that we re doing what we can do to preserve those properties and we have a good relationship with the County on doing that so again we will be putting that into ordinance So we just want to put out there because we ve never had this in our comprehensive plan before This level of goal to preserve and that will be reflected in the ordinances itself Any questions on that McDonald Any questions on Chapter 3 6 91 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Aanenson Okay And then Chapter 4 Housing We gave you a lot of numbers on that chapter and that was really talking about what our price points are Whether our value is in housing keeps or 402 000 is our current average value for housing in the community and we ve got a wide range of housing price points and so the question that was raised is why do we belong to Livable Communities Act What s the benefit of that So again we when we apply for other grants through the Metropolitan Council that s one of the things that they look at We have leveraged that money when we ve done projects For example the Gateway project that we just opened up was also rental affordable project that we did leverage Met Council money on that one So we do support belonging to the Livable Communities Act That s one of the things that we re still falling short on is affordable rental The rest of it the market takes place Fills that gap for affordable owner occupied The rental s a little bit more difficult to capture but we feel good about what we ve provided in meeting the goals and so we don t see that as big issue with the Met Council Any other questions on that McDonald Any questions on Chapter 4 Aanenson Okay I ll let Bob Generous Well you may think that the land use is the most important All these systems are important as part of the And the first one we ll deal with a natural resource element and something new that we re bringing out as part of this the 2030 comprehensive plan is the desire to develop a natural resource management plan Really a stewardship plan for the natural resources in the community We have some ordinances in place to build on We have the Bluff Creek primary zone The Bluff Creek protection ordinance The bluff protection ordinance A wetland protection ordinance and shoreland protection ordinance Now we re looking at the systems that are the natural systems that we have and we ll be developing a management plan for that How to enhance that and maintain the environment that will benefit the community overall So and some of the questions are how do they do this Well in the back we have goals to protect trees and provide some policies that we can develop Look at all the systems like that There s water and vegetation so but that will be a big over the next or two to come in and actually work with property owners and businesses to create this management plan Look at how we re going to maintain the property that we re getting as part of dedication through subdivisions or through acquisitions if any referendums take place So that s what the natural resources element is dealing with and it looks at vegetation and water and other natural systems and habitats I don t know if there s a whole lot more If you go into a lot of details I think we ve gone through that in a previous meeting Any more questions And again one of the questions came up was the surface water How does the city treat our surface water And we already have the ordinances in place We have a wetland protection ordinance We have a surface water management plan A second generation one so we re looking at that Later tonight we ll have the public hearing on the the MSP 4 Permit So the City s doing a lot to improve our water quality and with every development we look at that and we re only going to look at additional measures to help improve that water quality We think we re addressing some of the concern that we brought up along the way McDonald I think the biggest thing from you know the residents that I heard and I just want to make sure it s in here is everybody s concerned about the quality of the water especially the 7 92 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 lakes and what we do to it The impact of development Part of what we ve looked through here is to try to establish rules You mentioned the Bluff Creek Overlay We ve got some rather stringent requirements there as to how close you can go What you can do You know runoff and all of those things Going forward as part of the comprehensive plan if someone comes in and wants to do development are we going to have enough of a blue print to show you begin to look at impact upon the lakes and the waters of this area that we re going to be able to point to and say this is the goals you ve got to meet and everything Generous In the comp plan it provides you the general As part of our zoning and subdivision ordinance we have the specific regulatory requirements that people will have to address McDonald Right which are the sewers and the grades and all those kinds of things Aanenson Right McDonald I guess what I m just trying to get at is you know I m reading through the emails and everybody s very concerned about this section going in there What is going in there Are we putting something in there that says this is what we want to meet as far as the water quality and this is how you as someone who s developing or doing some of these is going to help us to meet that Aanenson Let me just back out of that Natural Resource plan is really an umbrella because we have the storm water management plan which is a separate document which we did last year and that plan also gives a list of projects that we re going to go forward and I think when we go into the next item I ve asked Terry to kind of weave all that together because we have all these little pieces But really the natural resource plan is broader than just how we manage water because we have as Bob indicated we ve got the requirements that you have to do for a project For permitting and the review But also when we talk about natural resources we talk about why do people move here Certainly it s for the lakes and water quality is for the wetlands It s for the trees The slopes So it s that broader thing And the goal that we re saying in here while we ve addressed storm water specifically with the storm water management plan we also want to step back and say we want to look at the natural resources as a whole Now we ve acquired all this property through extraction using the Bluff Creek Overlay Zone for example invasive species in some of those How are we going to manage the properties that we ve acquired So that s kind of what that natural resource plan It will include some of the storm water but that s kind of always be tracking on it s own separate McDonald Right Storm water s always separate because of the impact and the way we treat it Again what my issue came down to is natural resources Lakes waters those things because that s the comments that we have these lake groups that come up and talk about You talk about water clarity and you know the runoff that goes into these lakes and everything and the Seminary Fen How we those are natural resources and all I m trying to get at is that it s in here as far as the comprehensive plan goes that if someone comes in to this community and wants to do something they can read through this and understand If they have an impact on these areas we have certain goals and conditions that we want to meet 8 93 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Aanenson Correct And those are all the good buffers that we just applied We went back and revisited Moved re categorized our types of wetlands and changed the buffer setbacks and those sort of things so that s already in place but there s a whole other level and we ll get to that when we get to the next one McDonald Okay Aanenson Understood McDonald Does anyone else have anything on natural resources before Bob moves on Generous Now the parks and open space element and it looks at the future of the community and what it additional facilities that we will need This map basically represents what the city s long term vision is for it s parks and open space facilities There s a lot there has been more emphasis on preserving natural open spaces Not making the athletic fields but they also have those requirements and so it looks at all the standards that we use in determining how much land we need for population for our community parks our neighborhood parks and we look at service areas and all that All the things that go into that It also inventories some of the private and public other public agencies that some of these that we have in our community that also are available to our residents Basically this is a guide plan for looking at development in the future At one time a lot of the parks and open space were shown as our land use plan However that was really a misnomer because it gave people the impression that we had control of the property and we were going away from that land use and saying if the city is will attempt to purchase parkland in the future it s in the parks and open space element that s more appropriate and it provides more detail than we would be able to do under the land use element We believe this will be a good guide for the community The city s been known for our trail system and our extensive system of parks and we will continue to build them Again that s a quality of life issue Goes with natural resources It s things that people that come and live and work in the community like to have and so we re trying to develop a framework for providing that And so at the end of this there s actually the capital improvement program to show the phasing of acquisition and development of the park system That s the basically the parks and open space element It looks at trails parks primitive open space that the community will strive to provide as it continues to develop Aanenson Did you want to talk about the comments we got from Carver County In that email just briefly Generous Basically Carver County found that our plan was consistent with what they were doing They wanted to they talk about not providing connections into the regional park from the Camp Tanadoona area which we show on our future land use map However our concern is if the Campfire ever goes away we would still and that area develops it s guided for residential development on top of the park use so we would want to provide residents with an opportunity to get into the park So that was one of the issues that they came up with 9 94 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Aanenson Can I just add something else too We just found out too last week on the 41 crossing that we did get funded I forgot where that one is for the it s on the trail map there Right on the Generous Being recommended yes It s this connection here but it s highly ranked as part of the parks pedestrian trail system as part of for State funding and so the group that is proposing that if their recommendation is approved then Carver County s actually leading the process on that and if it s approved we will get a pedestrian underpass to connect our trail system within the Highover development to the Minnewashta Regional Park system Aanenson And that will also give an opportunity to the school who does use that to go underneath 41 to provide access over to the regional park Generous Create separation which is you know part of the entire if you look at the Bluff Creek corridor we have an underpass at Highway 5 With the Lyman Boulevard upgrade we ll have another underpass as part of Bluff Creek Boulevard we have a pedestrian underpass so we ll have this extensive system where parents and children can go down and have a separated grade crossing at our roadways Aanenson All the way from the regional park down Generous So that will take them down to Pioneer and then things will break up there because they can t we can t continue it s too steep to go down but we re looking at if that area develops that we ll have a trail system along the tops of the bluffs so people can look down into the gorge area and actually enjoy that environment without negatively impacting them It also talks about the southwest light rail system and the city continues to use that and maintain that as a pedestrian corridor and bike system I brought up the Campfire site The Seminary Fen is an area that the city would like to preserve and that s actually part of another mechanism to look at that We have a wetland protection ordinance McDonald Can I ask you a question about the Seminary Fen just to kind of clarify You say the city would like to preserve that Why couldn t we preserve it Is it all in private property at this point Generous It s all privately owned yes Aanenson That was when we looked at the wetland ordinance we did create a new category to increase the setbacks We have the control of a greater setback to reduce the impact on that but it s still in private ownership McDonald Okay thank you Generous We re always looking at the Herman Field connection to the regional park That s from the north side down into the project Again a lot of residents like to use this as an access into the regional park It s a public facility You know people are walking in There s word of mouth that hey this is a nice experience and they can share that with other people and then they 10 95 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 can come so we d like to keep those connections informal connections that we have and provide for that in the future so we don t believe that there should be anything that separates our local systems from the regional system And again you can drive a car in there This is something you would walk in That was it from the County Otherwise they seem to agree with our park and trail plan and work in conjunction with us to help facility that 7 And this is where before the meeting I provided you with a revised pages 8 through 11 The first two paragraphs were added due to comments that we received from Eden Prairie and those were The transportation element deals with existing facilities and deficiencies in our facilities and what we have to do to that However there were like I said a couple changes that we were talking about specific projects within this element and it talks about improvements to the roadway system and then we developed a capital improvement at the end Chapter 10 deals with trying to combine the capital improvements We ll get to that later but one other question there was how do you recall these projects and people can see what s all involved in that and we tried to address that The MUSA phasing was staging helps to determine priorities for when projects should be or roadway improvements will be done For instance on Highway 101 the improvement from Lyman to Pioneer needs to take place around the 2010 MUSA development phase so that we have adequate infrastructure to serve the development in that area As we continue to move south to the 2015 area we ll deal with 101 from Pioneer down to the existing Flying Cloud Boulevard or existing 212 corridor which will become County Road 61 with the turn back and everything that goes forward with that Again the capital improvements are on 10 We tried to clarify that The idea of the question came up about bridges and the city does or the bridges in the community are inspected on a timely manner based on the National Bridge Inspection Standards which happen and those inspections happen every 1 to 2 years We can add that right into the plan That s not a problem to approve 101 again we re investigating funding sources for this We didn t make any of the cut off s in this round of funding Of course there s a lot of transportation improvements that need to be done in the state and so they have to prioritize that and come up with adequate funding sources And then beginning of page 8 is where Eden Prairie provided us with comments on the map and they have to do first with their own well which is on the eastern entrance to the community We currently designate the south lane from Highway 5 to the border as a collector road They want us to upgrade that to a minor arterial A main minor arterial and that s consistent with the Met Council guidelines that it carries sufficient traffic volumes and has a design speed that would accommodate a minor connector arterial And with the opening of 312 and additional traffic will be going down there And then on the north side we currently have Dell as a local street They would like us to show it as a minor collector As a collector roadway and so we re recommending that that change be done And then in the narrative we show Lyman Boulevard from 101 east We show it on the map as a collector but we don t have it in the narrative and so we re recommending that that be included in the narrative so our maps and our text correspond with each other And so that s all the revisions that came the sheet that I handed out tonight so Basically the transportation system looks at what type of facilities you ll need to handle the future development of the community We did a traffic analysis showing data to look at where trips generated and where they re going to grow and then we used piggy backed on Carver County for their projections for 2030 traffic volumes to look at which roadway systems have to be under which classifications And so basically that map is the outcome of all that study and analysis McDonald Anyone have any questions on Chapter 7 Thank you Chapter 8 11 96 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Generous Chapter 8 is the water Again this looks at existing and future systems needed within the community to provide sewer service to our residents Looks at and this map gets very detailed It looks at all the sizing that s appropriate to serve an area and it actually uses a MUSA phasing plan to look at when we do the improvements And that was one of the big questions that came up is why did they change from the 2020 plan Previously the 2010 MUSA was that area bounded by Pioneer 101 and 312 Well in looking at that there s a significant investment that the City would make in putting in a lift station and forcemain system to service that area And to pay for that improvement we had to have a sufficiently large area that would connect to it and pay the connection fees to help fund that project And also we looked in the 2010 MUSA area there wasn t a lot of developable land There s a big wetland complex The City had purchased a 30 acre park as part of it and so we didn t have there would be not enough land to accommodate our growth over that 5 year period and so we ve expanded the 2010 MUSA to include areas down to the golf course and over to Highway 101 Aanenson Just want to reiterate That was one of the questions when we presented this to you that you wanted to make sure our residents understood the implication of that We did have that additional meeting We sent out 250 300 notices We had a really good turnout for that We actually had engineering staff planning staff and park and rec there What we found out is the traffic patterns are changing on 101 We have some homes people that find it difficult to live in that situation would like to be able to subdivide their property Develop so they are anticipating sewer One of the things that the engineering staff looked at in modeling that future area is we did provide for those large lot subdivisions if in the future they couldn t get sewer That s a potential It s not our goal to provide those large lot subdivisions with sewer That s a lifestyle that they ve chosen but if in the future we have failed systems and we re trying to protect ground water sometimes we have that as option We model that We understand that cost but certainly development this came up last time I just want to reiterate it Development as we move south depends also on adequate infrastructure which includes 101 As Bob indicated we didn t get the funding so those are kind of all tied together The City doesn t have isn t acting as a developer We respond to development so for things to happen someone comes forward with a proposal to make development happen so when we look at the Erhart property which we looked at before that s the biggest one that would be going forward in the next MUSA which is scheduled 2010 It s a possibility that that could be advanced sooner than that and we re contemplating that But the rest of that area someone would have to come forward with a project and that would include the golf course or Mr Halla s property or some of those so the City s not seeking them to go out and develop That just provides that opportunity for that development to develop Generous And then again as part of the phasing plan we looked at and as part of the 2020 plan we actually looked at serving the Minnesota River Valley by going down Bluff Creek Boulevard The 2030 plan actually reverses that and looks at serving the river valley going down 101 so we picked up the easterly area there first The large lot development the Hesse Farm area on Bluff Creek Drive we don t believe that unless the systems start failing significantly will actually be served by sewer and water because we d have to they d have to put gravity sewer down to the river valley and then over to a lift station and bring it back up so that would be the last area and we don t know that there s enough properties that would make a 2020 MUSA area sufficient So 12 97 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 we think that we could put in two additional phases rather than a 2010 2015 and a 2020 MUSA So again that s the other big change then instead of having those 3 or 2004 2010 2015 and 2020 we have a 2010 and a 2015 phasing area McDonald Okay and out of all that if what I hear is correct the thing that kind of slows it down is infrastructure Roads and those types of things If something were to happen and 101 were to suddenly get accelerated and get fixed are we going to be able to accommodate that Generous The system and plans are in place We have the ideas in place that we can accommodate it Again that s development driven McDonald But I m saying if something happens right now 101 isn t probably going to stop anything just because of the road the way it is Generous Right McDonald But if something happens and say we didn t get funding I know a bridge was included in that across the river and which path it s going to take if that suddenly became a big priority and got changed that could probably change the total landscape down there Are we going to be okay to respond to that Generous We should be yes And then MUSA phasing is something that the City controls in conjunction with the Met Council The big thing is capacity We have a system that can handle that growth and they re trying to do this in an efficient and effective manner We re sizing everything to accommodate that future development Also we think that down in the river valley that some of the land use amendments that we re making that there ll be sufficiently high investment potential to make people want to do the to bring the sewer down there so they can put in their offices and support commercial center instead of the driving range and the nursery that s down there now So that s the sewer Any other questions And then a water system works in conjunction with the City s sewer plan Basically it looks like the existing facilities and your future facilities based on land use projections of ultimate build out of the community and what systems we will need to have in place And additional ones we know that we need another water town down to serve the southern part of the city however we re looking at several areas on Powers Boulevard there There s some areas that we re down on Lyman Boulevard In the high pressure zone which is the northeast northwestern part of the city we need to increase the capacity of the water storage tank up there We need to add about what is it 550 000 gallons of storage to meet the future demands of that area within the system Additionally we have a westerly water treatment plant that we re looking at so we get complete treatment of the city s water supply They just approved the contract for Wells 12 and 13 City Council did last night so that will bring back on line the wells that we lost last summer Keep our ability to meet the demands of existing and future development in line One of the big issues in this was the development of a or expansion of a conservation plan and the City has been working with the DNR to create a management plan or conservation management plan for our water supply It s still being commented on by the DNR and it s actually one of the attachments I don t know all the details I m not sure if Alyson does but we want to encourage people to conserve water Right now we per person we use too much water in our community We ve already adopted 13 98 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 some ordinances to hopefully reduce demand We have a tiered water system in place They added a third tier for water usage over a certain level They have the non watering hours for landscaping and they re going to monitor that and see if that works and then we ll have to continue from there Aanenson I ll let Terry talk about the grant Jeffery Mr Chair commissioners Currently we re working with the EPA right now on a grant proposal Jill Sinclair is actually setting it up and what this will do is it will allow us funding to implement a number of different educational programs throughout the city as well as grants We haven t worked out all the details yet but we re thinking a rebate program for rain sensors for irrigation systems that went in before 2002 where they might not have those It might be something as simple as leak detection kits in toilets but currently Jill s working on that grant That deadline I believe is in the middle of March so we should have we re supposed to have something in place vehicle in place the middle of May if we are awarded this grant so Aanenson And the Environmental Commission has actually taken that under their for their program this year Work on the educational component so that was an issue that was certainly a big concern that we need to be addressing and we want to show you that we ve included in the packet the application that engineering s working on to resolve that issue and what we re doing in house to educate our residents about water usage Generous So that s water McDonald Does anyone on the commission have any questions or comments Concerns Chapter 10 Capital improvements Generous That s the final and this is a document that actually ties together the various chapters of the comprehensive plan It shows you to the magnitude and sort of a timing improvements that are necessary for the community Again like I stated before one of the questions is how do you show people what s involved in a project and so we started to we tried to amend this table to show that as a part of this specific project we would also look at like a street project or a surface water management project or utility extension so that s one of the things we have Annually the city adopts a 5 year capital improvement program That s the detailed document that we ll get into the specifics on any individual project and we don t believe that as part of the comprehensive plan that s the place to put that type of information Again this just provides you with a general magnitude of the cost of an improvement and the approximate timing of it But the only time that we know for sure that something s funded is in the 2008 CIP which the projects are scheduled for 2008 But we wanted to show you how the comprehensive plan capital improvement program sort of relates to the annual CIP And so with that we re proposing and I tried to show the revisions based on both the adoption of the 2012 CIP and additions that were inclined as part of that So that s help you find what has changed since the first document that you saw As well as I put in the column for the associated progress With that I would go to jurisdictional review The City has received comments or a sign of a waiver from Eden Prairie School District 276 the City of Minnetonka and the City of Shakopee and I believe this morning the lone watershed district also provided a sign off Again we jurisdictions 14 99 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 st adjacent to the community have until January or April 1 to submit any comments that they have and so we ll wait to hear that So far no other discussions We think we have a pretty good plan in place and it s pretty thorough And then with that we go to the recommendation Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt the revised motion which would have approve the recommend that City Council approve the 2030 comprehensive plan as modified with revisions to Chapter 7 which is the transportation element to include the Dell Road improvements as well as the write up on the Lyman Boulevard To Chapter 8 the sanitary sewer to incorporate the language regarding reasons for the changes to the MUSA phasing plan and those were basically those 3 paragraphs in the staff report The Chapter 9 the water element to record the incorporate additional language on water conservation and ideas that the community has and the revisions to Chapter 10 incorporating that the revised CIP as I outlined tonight And authorize the submittal of the plan to the Metropolitan Council for their review With that I d be happy to answer any questions McDonald Want to ask any questions I ve got a question for you On Chapter 10 you talk about the CIP and you say it s a 5 year plan and you really don t think that it s appropriate within the comprehensive plan I m a little confused What is in there and why is it in the comprehensive plan if it s dealt with as part of the 5 year plan That means it will change a couple of times before it ever gets to 2015 Generous Right and the 2030 comprehensive plan has a 10 year timeframe that we re looking at because in 10 years again we ll have to update our comprehensive plan so it provides a general guideline that these these are the projects that we envision taking place within this timeframe but the actual funding of those will happen within the City s 5 year capital improvement program which they will adopt annually And it may change over time Priorities change like you said Development may come in and it will require that we make these street improvements over here earlier than we had originally envisioned McDonald Let me just add to that In your draft plan that you have in front of you we have a requirement that meets the Metropolitan Council s requirement of the comprehensive plan What we included for you tonight is the detailed City 5 year plan grouping those things together that are in within the 5 years We have it in there in the comprehensive plan It s not to the detail that we do when we do our comprehensive plan And what we want to show you is what projects are linked together When we do a road project there s often storm water improvements put with it so we try to show those linkages How those go together That s what s not in your draft so what we gave tonight is more detail on that but we only took that to the 5 year We didn t take it to the level of detail that s in the comprehensive plan because at a staff level we don t have that much information yet But we ve met the level of the law in the draft itself We just want to give you more detail for the next 5 or 10 years Larson I ve got a quick question I hate to go back to the water chapter but these drift aquifers that they re referring to that went dry with weather changes and if we get more rain I mean are those able to be refilled and used again at some point in the future or 15 100 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Fauske We have a consultant the City s hiring a consultant to give us good direction on where we should be putting new wells Recovery of the aquifers and at this point there s just no water that goes out so that s why we re looking to develop the two new wells Larson Okay thanks McDonald Do we want to discuss this as a commission or are we ready to jump right into a motion for the recommendation I mean to me it s a lot of stuff and I m glad we spread it out over a number of months and everything but there really is a lot to try to get your arms around A lot of detail and we ve heard a lot of comments and all those have been very helpful I think that this has accomplished what the public has given us as far as feedback You ve reflected some of that as you ve brought it before us You ve at least addressed the issues and comments so I hope that from that point everyone feels that we are transparent in putting this plan together It is a community effort I think has done a marvelous job doing it for us but yeah It s a big thing to try to figure out and I guess just kind of understand what s going on I don t have any problems with any of it I m not trying to say that but I don t know if overwhelmed is the right word or not either but there is definitely a lot here and it kind of gives you pause to think of what goes on as far as development I don t know if I m a little slow to want to get into this just to kind of comprehend it but are we at a point where everyone feels comfortable with putting together a motion and we ll go from there Or does anyone wish to discuss any further elements Do you feel that everything we ve asked as far as questions over the past couple of months have been addressed Papke I guess I don t have any question Just kind of a gut reaction to the you know looking at this whole thing you kind of it makes you kind of step back and at least attempt to see the big picture and just going back to land use again for a second I m I kind of reading it over I feel a little conflicted On one hand we re getting some pressure to get away from residential construction and move more towards commercial etc On the other hand we re looking to develop the golf course into residential areas and then in the paper this morning very topical You know here s Chanhassen on top of the pile in the whole metropolitan area in terms of you know the least amount of degradation of our housing market here in the last couple years So any comments on that You know just from a land use perspective I m trying to reconcile it seems sometimes like the people who are trying to develop their property there s always the tendency to quickly react to market conditions but we re trying to look out 10 15 30 years here and make decisions for the long term Aanenson That s a great comment Yes it s timely We ll also be featured in the Star Tribune too about the city of Chanhassen It s you know we re in the right place at the right time We re close to I think the paper said it We re close to jobs and creation We re creating a lot of jobs here The biggest change if you look at what we re looking at with the comprehensive plan We looked at the commercial You know our guiding principle what attracts what we believe attracts people here is the balance of the environment The lakes The trees The wetland which you know we Tree City USA Those things that we care about Our parks Our trails Top notch We ve got a concentrated downtown and we spent a lot of time as a group reflecting on if we were to add more commercial what does that do to the downtown We ve never had strip commercial up and down Highway 5 We don t want to have strip 16 101 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 commercial out The biggest bubble you see in the addition of commercial is if we do a regional mall and that is a big paradigm shift and we spent a lot of time This is over a year process since we did the McCombs study to really evaluate what that does to the downtown So in looking at that we counter balance that We didn t talk about that tonight but to add some of that other additional commercial adjacent to downtown is why we didn t want that strip to go on this other piece if we look at that in a vacuum We re saying there s an opportunity some vacant buildings there to do industrial but as a whole we re still going to always be predominantly low density residential That s our predominant land use Residential and low density But that s going to be but now we re looking at is we re maturing just a little infill and we re being really careful and I think we spend a lot of time saying where s the appropriate place to put those to maintain that quality of life where we have walkability transportation That we re not plugging up those streets as we talk about as we move further south so we ve really tried to look at that carefully and really if you step back it has been a whole year process and the biggest part of it is that commercial and that office piece and again looking at where we have a lot of office industrial we want to move higher value Pure office which we re going to see a lot more of those interchanges where we have the transportation to accommodate that and give us that higher tax value as Mr Erhart s looking at his parcels so I think you know I ve been here 15 years I want to continue to make those good decisions where we end up on the you know as seen as a good plan When I say plan that doesn t just mean planning That includes engineering parks and rec as a well thought out city and we want to continue to do that in the future and build on the success that we have had So I m hopeful that this plan reflects that McDonald Well the one thing if we re looking at this that you know hats off to you for coming up with this dual zoning approach I think that that really helps It solves a lot of problems It does kind of put out there what we re looking for as to how we re going to develop and I guess based upon that I think it s such a good idea I d like to see it used a little bit more Not carte blanche for across the board but there are certain areas within the city that I think might lend itself and most of that s along the corridor of 212 just because of the way the land that s adjacent to it and I guess that s a little bit of a hesitancy on my part that maybe we should have included more property along that corridor to do a little bit more dual zoning I don t have a good feel for that but that s my inclination that maybe that needs more looking at This probably isn t the time to do it at this point but Aanenson Sure Let me just add to that on that because I don t know if you remember we did spend a lot of time on looking at that and we said if we could create a regional mall it s a lot of synergy that happens in that Just like the synergy that goes with downtown and you create traffic so what are we going to do Just like the same position we ve taken on Highway 5 We don t want strip commercial up and down Highway 5 If we re going to put a regional mall there what are we going to do to control it to make sure that we don t have creeping things that want to capitalize on that captured market so we said we don t want to create that commercial core We want to have office that supports that People who go there and do those sort of things so when we went through that commercial study that was what we spent a lot of time on and I think that s one of the successes that we ve had to try to concentrate that into the core Kind of right now our commercial center s powers We did move some out because we said there is some neighborhood support We call that neighborhood support commercial as opposed to the central business district which to date has been more convenience commercial This is where I 17 102 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 do my groceries I run to the post office Do the library visit Kind of that sort of thing as opposed to in your neighborhood where you may get gas pick up bread milk on the way home Now when we look at the regional mall and that s a larger trade area Drawing residents well beyond our limits to the city No longer necessarily convenience but more comparison shopping We said we want to create that energy downtown but we don t want it to be all the way up and down Powers All the way up and down 101 We want to control it so it fits and works into our neighborhoods which we really historically have had that strong planning perspective so we were really careful in looking at where we wanted to do that with the dual guiding for commercial So that s where that came from When we looked at that triangle piece that s the Laurent property That s the pure office piece there and we said you know we talked about where else would we get gas on that southern end of the city You said there s anywhere we want to just provide some convenience for those neighbors to say before I get on 212 or on my way out to work I want to stop and get gas We looked at we didn t say we re definitely going to give it but there was somewhere to give it we d put it there so we did consider those sort of things so in my opinion you know it s been a while back when we had those discussions Back when we started with the consultant We had SRF go through those exercises with the City Council and we gave those recommendations but I think we were careful to not kind of move away from our historical commercial values and neighborhood values What makes a nice neighborhood McDonald I guess you know my point is I m not trying to be a planner You know as part of being on the Planning Commission I think what we look at we don t have the broad knowledge and experience that staff has What we try to look at is okay we have these ordinances and zoning requirements and then we try to apply things against those and give recommendations It s all we re giving is recommendations And I guess one of the things I m looking at is as a planning group you know is it beneficial for us to have options as far as and maybe it s not so much for us but it s options as far as development so that when things come in do we have enough flexibility to do things To move with the market or something That s my only hesitancy in all this is I mean I m going to vote for this I have no problem whatsoever We re in the process of just discussing That s one of my concerns I guess I would want to pass forward to City Council is that I would not want to see a document that is so locked in just because of my prior experience to know that markets drive all of this That s my concern and that s the thing that when I say yeah the dual zoning seems to open that up a little bit more for us Aanenson And I think you know the there s a pro and con with that The beauty of that is it does give the property owner options It gives the city options It also lets the neighbors know it could go either way so if you do change it because of market changes you re not on that uphill swing to try to make that change McDonald We ve had enough of those meetings Aanenson There s been enough of those so if that s your preference as you indicated and I think that s very appropriate for you to say to the City Council that there may be some parcels that you would like them to consider some dual guiding on and certainly they re going to spend 18 103 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 some time going through everything that you just went through in this kind of a summary format too McDonald I didn t mean to steal any of your thunder Anything else Then I guess we re ready for someone to present a motion Larson No no no no no McDonald No no Okay Larson I m just since everybody s bringing up their concerns I m looking back at our land use We really are losing a lot of our residential Is the tax base which you re saying is so important is that so important that it offsets the need for the residential that we had originally proposed years ago Aanenson A lot of the residential was to clean up When we ve actually if you look at properties that we ve extracted out They re non developable that we put in preserve For example you know Liberty at Bluff Creek We took a lot of property and we took no longer buildable so we took that out of the mix So really a lot of what we did there is tightening what s buildable and what s not buildable If you look at that equation I think the only other piece that we looked at we did have some dual guiding down in that 2005 office industrial We said we d move that so that switched that around to the the Fox Fox Family and the Dorsey property We moved the office out there and we also gave that the retail And we did look at some additional well we took off on Mr Degler s property for example that had potential for either park and open space so some of that s clean up from before we had some dual guiding that we no longer want dual guiding We have better information We show that as potential park We re not going to probably use as a park That goes back to what Bob Generous stated earlier so a log of that is clean up I don t want to say we took out a lot of residential That may be Larson Okay Generous And if I may Mr Chair as part of our analysis of the ultimate build out of the community our number still come out pretty close to what we were projecting as part of our 2020 comprehensive plan Aanenson Correct That would be households and population so that comes back Generous So we re still on track It s just we ve added a like she said we cleaned up a lot of areas Larson Okay that makes sense Aanenson I don t want to think we just said well we re not going to do residential Larson As I say and it is very overwhelming and I just wanted to clarify that so 19 104 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 McDonald Okay Anyone else with anything to clarify or questions comments Then someone wants to present a motion we ll go with that Vote on it Undestad Alright I ll make a motion That the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as modified with revisions to Chapter 7 Transportation to designate Dell Road from Highway 5 north to the city limit as a major collector and Dell Road from Highway 5 south to the city limit as a B Minor Arterial and the minor collector narrative shall include Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 101 to the east city limits Sanitary sewer Chapter 8 to incorporate language regarding the reason for the changes to the MUSA phasing plan Chapter 9 Water to incorporate additional language on water conservation and Capital Improvements Chapter 10 incorporating the revised CIP Table and authorize submittal of the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review McDonald Do I have a second Larson Second Undestad moved Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the 2030 Comprehensive Plan as modified with revisions to Chapter 7 Transportation to designate Dell Road from Highway 5 north to the city limit as a major collector and Dell Road from Highway 5 south to the city limit as a B Minor Arterial and the minor collector narrative shall include Lyman Boulevard east of Highway 101 to the east city limits Sanitary sewer Chapter 8 to incorporate language regarding the reason for the changes to the MUSA phasing plan Chapter 9 Water to incorporate additional language on water conservation and Capital Improvements Chapter 10 incorporating the revised CIP Table and authorize submittal of the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0 McDonald And again my hats is off to staff I think you all have done a marvelous job from my perspective on the commission here of putting this together and I know you put a lot of time into it and for that I want to say thank you And I m sure the residents of the community would also second that PUBLIC HEARING MS4 PERMIT NONDEGRADATION REPORT AND REVISIONS TO THE CITY S STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM Public Present Name Address Mary Borns 7199 Frontier Trail Steve Donen 7341 Frontier Trail Diane Spencer Wenek Associates 20 105 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Terry Jeffery introduced himself to the commission as the new Water Resources Coordinator before presenting the staff report on this item along with Diane Spencer from Wenek Associates who reviewed the specifics of the report McDonald Well thank you That was interesting Papke Question What enforcement authority does the MPCA have here I mean if they don t like what we have do they come throw Terry in jail or what Diane Spencer The enforcement authority is that this is part of your NPDES permit and the City is required by law to have an approved NPDES permit So presumably until such time as they approve this your NPDES permit would not necessarily be out of compliance but it would be conditional And the other kind of sticks that are out there would be for example your comprehensive plan is that the MPCA may comment on your comprehensive plan proposal that well you haven t completed your Papke So they hold us hostage Diane Spencer Yeah your nondegradation assessment satisfactorily yet Larson Hostage to what I mean what s the punishment You know I mean if we don t comply what do they throw Terry in jail Diane Spencer civil side and that is that I m not aware of well let me back up and say that the whole reason for the nondegradation assessments is that this an outcome of a citizen lawsuit with the MPCA where the NCEA successfully litigated a case against the MPCA that the MPCA was not adequately enforcing that nondegradation language within statutes and the Court ordered the MPCA to establish this nondegradation requirement and force the Dirty 30 to go through this assessment McDonald Well I guess the thing is you put together a report what seems to be missing is well we ve had developers come in here and make a number of suggestions to us about things to do which I think addresses some of your issues about the first half inch and the first inch What s the impact to us I mean you know are we going to start coming up with the plans or is there studies afoot to do things about this I mean we already put in a every development we figured out a land use or a land mass and we say you ve got to have a retaining pond It s got to be so deep It s got to meet all these qualifications We do all that We go around We make sure that these ponds don t fill up to a point where at a big rain event they re swamped out sooner than what they are I mean it s nice to put a plan together and you re right it will keep you employed and I m sure your family is very happy for that but I don t understand what are we doing I mean we re already doing it Why do we need this plan And maybe it s the lawsuit Jeffery Mr Chair we re actually seeing these issues in other things It isn t that these are unique to just these areas I mean the reason we have issues down at Bluff Creek is because we re flashing a large volume of water down there that it cannot take and if that water were to be kept on site it would not be going down the Bluff Creek and we would not have the level 21 106 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 of speak to it we re seeing all those levels in areas lakes that are attributed to the volume that so these aren t just isolated to this area I mean they affect downstream issues that the city has obtained for in the long run anyway I mean if you look at the bar proposal that was put together to address all of Bluff Creek s issues I mean you re talking what was that 4 8 million project There s a cost and that cost has got to be absorbed somewhere McDonald Well I agree with all of that and what you say is true but what I m having a problem with and what do we have here is what s the impact I mean what do we have to do that s different than what we re not already doing Papke Maybe one specific example okay We re supposed to plant more trees So how are we going to make that happen Are you going to Kate you know every proposal that comes in are you going to add 10 more trees to what people are supposed to Jeffery Currently right now we re trying to look away from Mr Chair excuse me To look away from regulatory mechanisms in those cases I mean like I mentioned earlier we already have that reforestation plan in place and we already have the coupon at Arbor Day Perhaps we re not reaching as many people as we can with that or perhaps we can come up with some other type of incentive to doing those things I mean right now if you look through page 38 on this a lot of what we re looking at for regulatory type programs are the City will evaluate what options are out there It might be something like coming back to developers with a suite of options that you could put in place and some cities have done what they call curb number reduction where they will look at the overall curb numbers would be how much water runs off so you might have 100 curb number which would be completely impervious All the water runs off the site and we re done so it may be something where if you put in these features you can reduce the curb down here or reduce the amount of treatment you need to do on site So the motivation is that this can be done in ways that might not necessarily be regulatory but right now all we re really proposing is our slip modifications be that the city looks at these issues and comes up with a way that is palatable and consistent with what we currently have in place and with Best Management Practices that are accepted out there and come forward with that McDonald Okay I don t mean to keep beating this to death because I know we probably don t have much choice in the whole matter but the thing is you re looking at an area that is already developed I mean you talk about taking us back to 1988 That s ridiculous In 1988 I lived here Most of this was farmland Of course it s changed We ve developed We have more runoff We ve addressed the issues We have problems in certain areas with runoff and we ve tried to do everything with the storm water ponding and everything How are you going to go back and retrofit anything to there That s where the majority of the damage is being done in all of this Yes with new development I would agree You can put some new things in I m sure there ll be some new ordinances and everything but the net effect of this is the damage is already done It s out there You re not going to go out to some of these other developments and put in swales It s too late That s part of the initial development Maybe there are other things but we re trying everything we possibly can to address issues of water runoff because that is the number one thing that a consumer or a homeowner has come up here and complained about is the fact that water ran off my neighbor s property and flooded my basement and they re very concerned about that What more can we do I mean this is nice but this is where I get into the 22 107 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 thing of you know we re wasting taxpayers money I mean you know yes There s a problem We re trying to address it Show me something new here I guess that s what I m asking for is some me something new Yeah a new development but as we just went through the comp plan tonight there s not going to be that much more new development in this city Jeffery Yeah you know your point is taken I mean in these areas how do we go back and address and especially as we talked earlier I mean surface water management plans is intended to address water quantity and water quality issues You know I can t speak to the MPCA s or the EPA is actually where this all came from them but it is a vehicle for us to look at those areas that are developed and we can t you re right We can t go in there and say you know what your house but we do at the same time need to look at these areas and when something occurs in that area we ll see if it s possible to take it back McDonald Let me give you an example of something that s very immediate that I would love to see you know given some options for City Council to deal with There s a new development that Lundgren did was that it s not Vasserman Ridge is it Yeah people are coming in here now and they re wanting to do things as far as terracing Well we have a problem there because of the lot sizes and all this was well discussed before these developments were ever laid out But those lots impact the water the surface water within that entire community Come back with something there to show how are we going to mitigate that That s what City Council needs is and this report s nice and we can go through the numbers and everything but what are we going to do about these problems I mean I guess if you re looking at us to recommend something that this is a vehicle to get up to council that s what we need and that area s a prime example because of what people want to do They can t do it because we ve told them it will impact surface water runoff and it creates a big problem and that s where one of these developers came through and you know gave us a bunch of ideas it probably isn t going to work because of soil conditions and things like that but that s the kind of stuff I think we need That s what I would like to see come out of this That s what s got to go forward as far as council so that they can make ordinances based upon some of that Aanenson Correct and that s what where we re going just to make sure that this what we re saying here is that we re going to come back with that program Just kind of like with the comp plan so what we re saying these are our visions This is where we re going We re going to come back with that Create that menu Whether it s when we do a street project we put curbs in as a way to control the water So that s what this plan is stating that we re going to come back with those specific tactics to implement those McDonald And I guess what I m expressing is the frustration of a lot of homeowners that say another plan Where s the meat That s what we need to start getting at is where s the meat to protect people s property And another plan such as this it s nice You did a great job You know all that but okay if the real intent is to have some kind of change and effect something where s the plan And we have prime examples right here that are crying out for a solution The next big rainfall for that area we re going to have a big problem because the last event those homes weren t there Now they re there 23 108 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Diane Spencer Mr Chair if I could if you recall the purpose of the nondegradation assessment it s a very limited and it s a very prescribed type of study It s only purpose is to identify what the changes in nutrient loading the storm water volume have been and can be expected to be And determine what kind of impact your existing BMP s have and what this has done has demonstrated that what you re doing already for pollutant loading is on a macro level is adequate It s doing what it should be doing by not increasing that pollutant loadings since 1988 It identifies that storm water ponding is an issue and you need to do something to address storm water volume for a number of reasons Again that the vehicle for doing that is through amending your storm water pollution prevention program is identifying the process for saying how do we now go through on a more minute level put together that tool box that developers can use that we can then say to developers here s what you do So all this is doing is saying do we have a problem or not Yes in some areas No in other areas McDonald Well what I m saying is my recommendation government has a very good track record of establishing numbers There s 1988 Suddenly we don t mention that We re talking about eh so what What are they going to do Put up dams around the city and all the water stays in here We re going to have to drink it or something That s not going to happen The permits I don t understand the whole mechanism of that about having to get that If that impacts our water treatment or something but the thing is okay What are we going to do What s the plans You know what s the details We ve got to get to the details because we ve been talking about this for as long as I ve been on the Planning Commission which is a couple of years now and again that s what we need are the details of how we re going to address these issues You know and I think that s the bottom line of the what the State really wants is just I don t think they know how to ask for it Aanenson Mr Chair this is a public hearing so you may want to McDonald Okay if we re all done asking questions then Larson No I have one more I m so sorry You were talking about the reforestation I ve lived here since 1985 and when I first moved out here none of this was here It was all farmland and grazing land and everything else and just between City Hall and where I live which is a mile and a half up the road the forestation has 10 fold from what it was when I first moved out here because it was all graded before When you re talking about reforestation I take that as a forest that was knocked down and now we re putting it back No Then what is the reforestation mean Jeffery Well reforestation means Larson Well I m not quite finished When you re adding trees I mean Chanhassen has a lot more trees than I remember back in those days and so I guess I m thinking that you know like Diane said it s been beneficial that we ve had development but now we re talking you know a regional mall We re talking big box and things like that I mean how s all that going to affect what you re talking about I mean it s not just the citizens problem It s all this other stuff too and I don t want that to get lost in the shuffle here you know We re trying to make it and point 24 109 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 to the citizens that want to live here but it s more than that It s on quite a grander scale than that Jeffery Mr Chair to your point One of the things I tried to point out in the hearing and perhaps say it This city has done a great job There are a number of things that are already in place but I think so reforestation I mean we can go back and say okay and in 1896 it was big woods forest so I mean it s just a term that s used Reforestation planting of trees in an area that was native to big woods back then Larson So was this native to big woods I don t know Jeffery Yeah Larson Okay Jeffery This whole area prior to being settled would have been a big woods area Larson So we can blame our grandparents Jeffery Yeah I mean it s just Larson Darn farmers Jeffery To the other point as we look at big box areas what and I guess that s kind of what I wanted to speak to We have two choices We can be reactionary We have issues in and try and solve those problems or in other cases we might have the opportunity to be proactive by knowing what we have Many of your what you re talking about we will address through the SWMP plan and I ve been Todd Gerhardt myself have been talking about putting together those projects again and getting before the council about what is it that we re doing What s on our plate right now and where do we go from there so that s the vehicle that we ll look at through those projects This is just and I know I understand your frustration Great we ve got another study But at the same time it is another tool that we have to understand which watersheds McDonald Okay Well I want to welcome you to the city staff and you know I think we ve been very nice to you compared to what will happen at the next water event but just kind of keep that in mind that we do love you and you know we really don t mean any harm but yeah this is a very touchy issue Jeffery Well it is your city I mean McDonald Well it s your city now too Okay At this point if there s no other comments questions concerns then we ll throw it open to the public for comment from anyone wishing to come forward and address the commission And I thank you for your patience in waiting I know that Steve Donen It s been a long night 25 110 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 McDonald It s been a long night but I think well worth it Steve Donen My name is Steve Donen I live at 7341 Frontier Trail and I happen to be a member on the citizen advisory committee Your question is a good one Very appropriate What do you do We ve got some good ordinances We ve got some good rules that are listed basin here basin there and a basin here solutions are a whole different world than where we ve been They re around half inch one inch infiltrated into the ground Can t happen everywhere Can happen a whole bunch of places Okay So the answer to your question Jerry is we ve got to we ve got to work on infiltration And there s fancy words in your thing Extraction and all those fancy words and the thing to talk about that really is getting the ground water back into the ground where it used to go before we built all the impervious surface okay That s where it s got to go Back in the ground Okay How do we do that There are some challenges okay Big challenges in doing it Now for this plan 1988 works really good for places that aren t developed We can put in infiltration rules and we can put in more ponds and we can control those and I would hope through ordinances and other regulations that we would implement that we can get those done so that these lakes that are currently undeveloped don t become in the future Okay What happens on Lotus Lake Lotus Lake gets 5 inches of rain It goes up 17 inches Docks are rolling around Becomes unsafe Shorelines are getting destroyed All kinds of bad things are happening Well beyond well beyond the issue of the phosphorous Now Lotus Lake has too much phosphorous too okay because in 1988 it already had too much phosphorous Okay so we have to do more okay I wanted to read just quickly a little comment This is actually in the if you remember this is actually in your web site for this whole amount I wanted to point this out this line for you guys and that is is that the line that says down bring it down to right about here You want to zoom it in Anyways it gives a little why we re here and it says data collected from this assessment is can be used to identify changes and revisions to the BMP s within the existing storm water management plan to ring true to 1988 or better conditions for each parameter We don t have to stay at 1988 okay We have the opportunity to ask our city staff let s do better Okay What does it take to do better which was a great question What does it take It really takes infiltration It s a big deal Now the question becomes your immediate question is how do I get there How do I do infiltration in developed areas right Because undeveloped areas you put ordinances in and you can control the development We can make sure that it infiltrates the first inch to half inch of rain right Pretty easy to do Not easy but everybody will scream and yell it s going to cost you more money but I can guarantee you in the long run infiltration techniques are a whole lot easier and cheaper in the long run than cleaning out basements every 10 years Spending thousands of dollars hundreds of thousand of dollars on cleaning all these basements that we put in that fill up with all this stuff okay You put in 3 basements or 100 little infiltration things The infiltration items don t require a lot of work okay There s nice little garden you saw some pictures of some of them right So infiltration is the trick and you re going to hear hopefully by the end of the day you ll be sick of hearing it With all that so we really do I mean me personally I think the plan is well done I thank you for the presentation It was excellent It is well done They pointed out what the issues are and they are what they are As I pointed out in my letters today you guys saw a few of them today for us on Lotus Lake and some of the developed lakes are it s not enough Okay Now I do come here as part of this advisory committee for the watershed and I ask you guys a couple things tonight One is I would think that putting in 26 111 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 regulations to help put this stuff on the future development is a good deal Redevelopment s the right thing to do Charge your staff Go tell them what I need to do to help make this happen in the future to get better Charge them with it which you just did tonight which I thought was excellent Okay Along with all that though I also come to you with a proposal How can we make an example how do we come up with a plan or an example of how we really do improve thing in a developed area How do we do it Okay Our watershed district has chosen for various reasons Lotus Lake to prove that we can actually improve and reduce and improve the quality of the watershed in a developed area How they going to do it They re going to use they re going to come into our watershed and they re going to use some very very advance modeling techniques Very very advanced ideas and thoughts Maybe even some out of the box thoughts Say how are we going to go affect the watershed of Lotus Lake Okay And you re going to see this They have approximately 10 million set aside in their 10 year plan to fix Lotus Lake which will answer your question how do we do it how have they been thinking about doing it 5 000 rain gardens maybe Okay Street modifications Ways of infiltrating the ground So I ask you tonight one of my things I hear I agree with the plan I think it points out whatever you want it to do I think we have an opportunity with an organization to work with the watershed on Lotus Lake and prove to the rest of the world who doubts it can be done that we can do it so I m asking you all when you hear about this thing over the next year or two as they re finalizing their 10 year plan You say you know what we support that because we want to learn how to do this and we re going to work with the watershed to learn how to do it and do it well So I m giving you an opportunity the watershed has the funds They want to spend the resources to do it and we need you guys as a city to help us make it happen Okay That s what I have for tonight and Mary Borns is here I can give her speech too She said here read this Mary Borns is here to present some other things She said let s do it right the first time We ll spend a lot more money fixing Lotus Lake than we would have had we know been smarter about it you know 50 years ago Just a comment Mary would make Okay McDonald Okay thank you very much Steve Donen Thank you McDonald Does anyone else wish to come up and address the commissioners Well in that case I close the public hearing on this issue and I bring it back up before the commissioners for any final thoughts and comments before we move forward with anything Kurt let s start with you Papke No comment Thomas No I think I made mine thanks Larson Yeah no comment McDonald Okay I think the commission said everything about this Again it s a very good report and I do appreciate you bringing this up for us and you re right it does address things that we should be aware of Having said all of that I m not ready for anyone wishing to make a motion going forward 27 112 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Papke Mr Chair I d like to make a motion that the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the distribution of the Nondegradation Assessment to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in compliance with the NPDES Phase II permit as revised June 1 2006 McDonald Do I have a second Undestad Second Papke moved Undestad seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the distribution of the Nondegradation Assessment to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in compliance with the NPDES Phase II permit as revised June 1 2006 All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 5 to 0 PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP SNAP FITNESS REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A 50 000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD LOCATED AT 2411 GALPIN COURT LOT 1 BLOCK 2 CHANHASSEN WEST BUSINESS PARK APPLICANT EDEN TRACE CORP PLANNING CASE 07 27 Mark Undestad excused himself from the meeting due to a conflict of interest Bob Generous presented the staff report on this item McDonald Any questions of staff Larson Yes McDonald Debbie Larson Why do you want them to redirect the walkway to Galpin Boulevard and not through the trees Wouldn t that make a prettier walk Or are they too tight Generous Jill s answer to that was by going into that you impact the tree system and you have a tendency because they have to take Bobcats and stuff in that you destroy what you re trying to preserve Aanenson You have to grade it level Larson To put a walk back there Generous Yeah Aanenson Yeah put a sidewalk Yeah to meet ADA 28 113 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Larson Gotch ya Okay McDonald Alright Any other questions Papke Yeah This is going to be a very highly visible From Lyman this is going to be kind of the corner stone of that area The drawings it was hard to tell from the drawings It s easy to tell what the building is going to look like but it was hard to tell what the site is going to look like after the landscaping and trees and everything go in Any idea of how much of the building the trees are going to Aanenson Perspective from highway Papke Yeah from Galpin and from Lyman Generous Not the trees per se It should be fairly visible if you look at the landscaping plan Papke Yeah it didn t look like there was going to be a tremendous amount of landscaping that s going to be added in the front of the building Generous It s mostly on the Galpin side that they ll have the screening because of the existing concentration of preserved trees that they re going to have to need to do Papke How about berming Is there Generous No they re not berming The site actually goes down and so the Well it s 958 in this corner and it s finished floor elevation of 961 so it s 3 feet up from this the southeast However you re down at 65 66 About 968 at the Galpin intersection so you re down 7 feet to the finished grade so you re looking from the north you re looking down into the site From the south you re looking up On the south side the corner like I said will be mostly open on the landscaping plan They have incorporated the rain gardens too as part of their surface water system Papke Where are the existing trees on that Generous They re grouped right in this area so they go in and out and so they ll all most of the new plantings heavy concentration there This will be more open on the south side Papke Yeah it looks like the parking lot comes pretty close to the right of way on the south side Generous Yeah it meets it s at the 20 foot when you get over to the west end Papke Okay Well I guess the good news is it s a good looking building but it is it does seem like it s going to be extremely visible 29 114 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 Aanenson We did make modifications from when it first came in We did ask for some additional articulation Some window treatments That concern It is a highly visible building Generous Yeah all these upper level windows were something that we added base around the windows and then the expansion of these stone material Aanenson Those are all the changes from the first Generous And plus you know they incorporated these arches over the the bigger windows to add the emphasis that provides the interest to the building McDonald Is there actually a second story up there with those windows Generous No McDonald Or is that just a really high ceiling Generous Yes It s a high roof Aanenson And again we wanted to give it that look a more office on two stories as opposed to a larger warehouse Larson So would they just be real windows or are they just faade treatments McDonald Okay no further questions This is a public meeting so I would ask if there s anyone out there that wishes to make comment please come up to the podium and address the commissioners with your comments Applicant I m just here for questions McDonald Oh okay Well in that case seeing no one come up I will close the public meeting and I ll bring it back up for the commissioners for any final thoughts or comments Kathleen Thomas I don t really have any comments It is visible but I think like that s they ve done a good job at kind of making it acceptable for being on the corner so and being so visible so I m okay with it McDonald Debbie Larson Nothing McDonald Kurt Papke I have no concerns I think it s a very attractively designed building and it will finish off that development quite nicely It would have been nice to have a few more trees there on the corner but for what they re trying to cram in there I can see why they re doing what they re 30 115 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 doing They re certainly following all the city codes and so on They re not breaking any rules so I can t fault them for what they re doing there so I m fine with it McDonald Okay Then in that case does anyone wish to make a motion for recommendation Thomas Sure I d like to make a motion the Chanhassen Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Planning Case 07 27 approving a site plan for a 50 000 square foot one story office warehouse building plans prepared by Houwman Architects dated November 6 2007 subject to the following conditions Conditions 1 through 31 with the removal of condition 32 McDonald Okay Do I have a second Larson I ll second that Thomas moved Larson seconded that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approves Planning Case 07 27 approving a site plan for a 50 000 square foot one story office warehouse building plans prepared by Houwman Architects dated November 06 2007 subject to the following conditions 1 The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system 2 The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota 3 The plan must be revised to meet the 50 foot setback from the property line on Galpin Boulevard to the parking lot 4 Site lighting shall be revised to incorporate high pressure sodium vapor lamps 5 Architectural lighting shall be down cast only 6 Two upper level windows shall be added on the west end of the south building elevation 7 A column shall be added in the middle of the north building elevation 8 The developer shall provide a pedestrian connection from the site to Lyman Boulevard 9 The proposed sidewalk shall not be located within the existing group of protected trees The sidewalk shall be located either north or south of this area with City approval 10 Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs for trail and sidewalk connections 11 All plantings along Galpin Boulevard shall be field located so as to not damage existing trees No trees or shrubs shall be planted within the protected area of trees without City approval 31 116 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 12 All trees shown as preserved on plans dated 09 16 07 shall be protected by tree protection fencing before any construction activities begin Any trees killed or damaged shall be replaced at a rate of 2 1 diameter inches 13 Shrub quantities shall be increased to meet minimum requirements for bufferyard plantings 14 Wood chip mulch shall be used around trees in all landscape peninsulas in place of sod or rocks 15 Applicant must comply with the following Fire Prevention policies a 40 1995 Fire Sprinkler requirements b 07 1991 Pre fire plan drawings c 29 1991 Premises identification d 34 1993 Water service installation e 36 1994 Combination Fire Domestic water service line Combustible Storage and High Pile Combustible Storage 16 Applicant must fill out the form 17 No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed Trees and scrubs must either be removed from site or chipped 18 A 10 foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants 19 The park fees payable with the building permit shall be 42 416 00 20 Sheet C1 shall be amended to show inlet protections on all existing storm sewer inlets 21 Sheet C1 shall be amended to extend the erosion control blanket in the northeast corner of the lot to cover all soil until the proposed grading matches the existing grade 22 Sheet C4 item 2 shall be amended to insert the construction of rain gardens as item 11 in the sequencing of construction activities and inspect site shall be amended so that it is 12 in the sequence 23 Sheet C4 item 5 1 shall have language added to the effect that the SWPPP all amendments and the NPDES permit shall be kept on site in a readily accessible location known to all relevant individuals 24 Sheet L1 the rain gardens shall be designed so that water runoff from the parking area will travel through some form of filter BMP 32 117 Planning Commission Meeting January 15 2008 25 The rain gardens shall be designed to drain within 48 hours and not be inundated to a depth greater than one foot during a 10 year storm event Calculations need to be provided supporting this 26 The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies and comply with their conditions of approval 27 The complete existing contours must be shown on the east side of the property 28 The proposed contours must tie into the existing contours shown on the plan 29 Retaining walls four feet high or higher require a building permit and must be designed by an engineer registered in the State of Minnesota 30 Eight inch watermain must be looped around the building This watermain shall be privately owned and maintained 31 A cross access agreement must be dedicated and a copy provided to the City before the building permit is issued All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 4 to 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Thomas noted the verbatim and summary minutes of the Planning Commission meeting dated December 4 2007 as presented COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS None Chairman McDonald adjourned the Planning Commission meeting at 9 50 p m Submitted by Kate Aanenson Community Development Director Prepared by Nann Opheim 33 118 CHANHASSEN PARK AND RE CREATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES JANUARY 22, 2008 Chairman Stolar called the m eeting to order at 7:30 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Glenn Stolar, Tom Kelly, Paula Atkins, Jeff Daniel, Dan Campion and Steve Scharfenberg MEMBERS ABSENT: Thor Smith STAFF PRESENT: Todd Hoffman, Park and Rec Dir ector; and John Stutzman, Recreation Supervisor APPOINTMENT OF 2008 CHAIRP ERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON Commissioner Daniels was elected Chair and Commissi oner Kelly was elected Vice-Chair by a unanimous vote. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: The agenda was approved as presented. PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS: Recreation Supervisor Stutzman reminded the commission that February Festival is sche duled for Saturday, February 2 nd . VISITOR PRESENTATIONS: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Kelly moved, Scharfenberg sec onded to approve the verbatim and summary minutes of the Park and Recr eation Commission meeting dated December 9, 2007. All voted in favor and the motion carried unanimously with a vote of 6 to 0. NEW BUSINESS Presentation of Site Plans for Municipal Wells 12 and 13; South Lotu s Lake Park and Chanhassen Estates Park – Paul Oehme, Public Works Direct or/City Engineer: Paul Oehme gave a presentation on the upcomi ng municipal wells that are pr oposed to be constructed in Chanhassen Estates Park and Sout h Lotus Lake Park. Both project s are being designed to minimize disturbance at the parks and to be as unobtrusive as possible. Co mmissioners asked questions about the need for new wells at these locations, landscaping and site desi gn. They also were concerned that any disruptions of normal park activity be kept to a minimum. 2008 Park and Trail Capital Improv ement Program (CIP) Overview: Todd Hoffman gave an overview of the scheduled 20 08 Park and Trail Capital Improvement Program (CIP). • Carver Beach Park Fishing Dock Extension - $3,000 • Trees - $5,000 119 Park and Rec Commission Summary - January 23, 2007 2 • Picnic Tables/Park Benches - $6,000 • Recreation Center Fitn ess Equipment - $10,000 • Recreation Center Lobby Furniture - $18,800 • Lakeside Trail (Lyman Boulevard) - $60,000 • The Preserve Trail and Bridge - $250,000 • Arboretum Business Park Lot 12 Trail - $317,000 OLD BUSINESS - None REPORTS: Reports were given on the 2008 February Festival and Adult 3-on-3 Basketball Leagues. COMMISSION MEMBER COMMITTEE REPORTS COMMISSION MEMBER PRESENTATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE PACKET ADJOURNMENT Scharfenberg moved, Kelly seconded to adjourn th e meeting. All voted in favor and the motion carried. The Park and Recreati on Commission meeting was adjourned. Prepared and submitted by Todd Hoffman Park and Recreation Director 120 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site W IN cj chanhassen mn us 16 MEMORANDUM TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager FROM Paul Oehme Dir of Public Works City Engineer 0 February 11 2008 OVA Well No 13 Project No 08 05 Approve Vacant Land Purchase Agreement for Chanhassen Estates Park and Well No 13 Improvements DATE SUBJ REQUESTED ACTION Approve Vacant Land Purchase Agreement BACKGROUND In October 2007 Council authorized staff to begin preparation of plans for Well Nos 12 and 13 On November 13 2007 staff held a neighborhood meeting for surrounding property owners to learn about the project On December 10 2007 Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized Advertisement for Bids for the wells On January 14 2008 Council approved a construction contract for drilling Well Nos 12 13 DISCUSSION Staff is requesting the Council approve the purchase of a strip of land adjacent to Chanhassen Estates Park and Lake Drive E Currently Chanhassen Estates Park is mostly land locked by private property The City does own a 25 small strip of property on the northeast comer of the park however this property is encumbered by aboveground electrical transformers and other private utility pedestals This strip of property also has a trunk storm sewer and sanitary sewer pipe buried in the property The City owned property is a poor access for construction and for future maintenance of the well The lack of City owned property along Lake Drive E also will make the raw watermain installation for the well more expensive and will cause the raw watermain to have a poor hydraulic alignment Park maintenance uses the City owned property for maintenance access but the park does not have a public access such as a parking lot or trail The Parks The City 01 Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a chamning downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 121 Todd Gerhardt Well No 13 Land Purchase Agreement February 11 2008 Page 2 Department is planning to construct a small parking lot in the future with access to Lake Drive E if the property is acquired Staff has successfully negotiated a purchase agreement for this property The purchase agreement is consistent with the limited appraisal drafted last year for the property The property to the west of the park along Lake Drive E is also recommended for purchase This piece of property will be used as a corridor for the future alignment of the raw watermain The total acreage proposed to be purchased is 12 377 sJ The appraised value of the property was between 2 00 and 2 80 sJ The purchase price is for 29 019 Funding for the project is recommended from both the Parks Department Park Dedication Fund and the project budget for Well No 13 improvements Water Utility Fund Funding is proposed as follows 7 500 from the Parks Dedication Fund and 21 519 from the Water Utility Fund Staff recommends approval of the purchase agreement Attachments G ENGIPUBLICI 200S PI lje sIOS 05 Well No 13 Lake Drivelbkgd 021108 uprv lund pur ugrmt doc 122 Restricted Use Appraisal Report Property Land Parcel XXXX Lake Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 Prepared For City of Chanhassen AUn Paul Oehme 7700 Market Boulevard Chanhassen MN 55317 Date November 2 2007 Prepared Bv William R Waytas Appraiser NAGELL APPRAISAL CONSULTING 7515 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis MN 55426 Telephone 952 544 8966 Fax No 952 544 8969 File G0710011 123 ZONING The subject use is zoned BH Highway Business The subject appears to be a legal and conforming use Primary permitted uses are restaurants hotels gas stations and numerous other uses that tend to be nearby highways See Highest and Best Use PLAT MAP Yellow and Blue is the overall property Blue is the portion being Appraised See addenda for map provided by city 8 Nagell Appraisal Consulting I 952 544 8966 I www callnagell com J 124 Sales Comparison Approach continued Market Data For land Value Listed below are sales in the subject marketing area Comparables used bracket the subject regarding overall appeal and are rated to be the best available data SUBJECT Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 Address XXXX Lake Dr 8024 Erie Ave 8005 Cheyenne 8006 Erie Ave Chanhassen Chanhassen Ave Chanhassen Chanhassen Proximity Subject 0 19 0 07 0 15 Conditions Market Average Average Average Location Average Average Average Average Use Single Family Single Family Single Family Single Family Site Size SF 14 755 12 589 12 806 15 751 Site Average Average Average Average Traffic Minor Minor Minor Minor Amenity Average Average Average Average Utilities Available Available Available Available Sale Date Current Apr 07 Nov 05 Jun 05 Price Per SF 7 55 per SF 8 43 per SF 7 18 per SF Conclusion Sales above range from 7 18 to 8 43 per SF with an average of 7 72 Therefore given the above information and considering the overall characteristics of the subject property view traffic and market a value of 8 00 is deemed appropriate Typical side yard value is about 50 or 4 00 per SF allowing for limited appeal for busy road for residential use the contributory value of the western portion is estimated to be about 50 of side yard value or 2 00 per SF The eastern area adjoining the park is considered to have better appeal more utility for front portion of park use therefore the estimated value is 35 or 2 80 per SF The Sales Comparison Approach is deemed a reliable indicator of value because it represents the actions of buyers and sellers in the area for competing properties The derived market value estimate for the overall subject site is calculated as follows Western Portion Area Eastern Portion Area 25 x 281 84 7 046 x 2 00 per SF 25 30 x 210 5 331 x 2 80 per SF 14 092 14 927 TOTAL OPINION OF SITE MARKET VALUE 29 019 16 Nagell Appraisal Consulting I 952 544 8966 I www callnagell com 125 Thomas J Campbell Roger N Knutson Thomas M Scott Elliott B Knctsch Joel J Jamnik Andrea McDowell Poehler Soren M Mattick John F Kelly Henry A Schaeffer III Alina Schwartz Samuel J Edmunds M uguerite M McCarron t3SO Corporate Center Curve Suite 317 Eagan MN 55121 651 452 5000 fax 651 452 5550 www ck Iaw com CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association January 24 2008 Mr and Mrs Jack D Christenson 270 Smugglers Cove Road Friday Harbor Washington 98250 8539 Re City of Chanhassen Real Estate Purchase Dear Mr and Mrs Christenson Weare the attorneys for the City of Chanhassen Enclosed herein please find the originals of the following documents 1 Vacant Land Purchase Agreement 2 Warranty Deed 3 Affidavit Regarding Seller 4 Certificate of Representation and Warranties 5 Non Foreign Affidavit Purchase to Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code 6 Partial Release of Mortgage to be executed by Kleinbank 7 Partial Release of Mortgages to be executed by Community Resource Bank 8 Partial Release of Assignment of Leases and Rents to be executed by Community Resource Bank and 9 Partial Release ofUCC Financing Statement to be executed by Community Resource Bank If you have any questions about any ofthe documents please contact me Otherwise I request that you and your wife sign the Purchase Agreement and return that document to me at this time Paul Oehme at the City would like to present the Purchase Agreement for approval by the City Council at its February 11 meeting so that we can close the transaction on or about February 15 I look forward to receiving the Purchase Agreement back from you Again please contact me if you have any questions Best regards TMS cjh Enclosure cc Mr Paul Oehme 126 VACANT LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT 1 PARTIES This Purchase Agreement is made on day of 2008 by and between the CITY OF CHANHASSEN a Minnesota municipal corporation Buyer and JACK D CHRISTENSON and PATRICIA A CHRISTENSON husband and wife Seller 2 OFFER ACCEPTANCE Buyer offers to purchase and Seller agrees to sell real property legally described as follows That part of Lot 1 Block 2 CHAN HAVEN PLAZA Carver County Minnesota described as follows Beginning at the southeast comer of said Lot 1 thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of said Lot l a distance of210 00 feet thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of281 81 feet thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of25 00 feet to the north line of said Lot 1 thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of281 84 feet thence South 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 163 50 feet thence 47 17 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a central angle of 12 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds and a radius of 220 00 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 1 thence South 00 degrees 48 minutes 27 seconds West along the east line of said Lot la distance of 30 04 feet to the point of beginning 3 PRICE AND TERMS The price for the real property included in this sale is Twenty nine Thousand Nineteen and Noll 00 Dollars 29 019 00 which Buyer shall pay to Seller at closing which is scheduled to occur on or before February 15 2008 4 DEED MARKET ABLE TITLE Upon performance by Buyer Seller shall execute and deliver a Warranty Deed conveying marketable title of record subject to A Covenants conditions restrictions declarations and easements of record if any B Reservations of minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota if any and C Building and zoning laws ordinances state and federal regulations 5 REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS A Prior Years Delinquent Real Estate Taxes and Delinquent Special Assessments Delinquent real estate taxes payable in years prior to the year of Closing and delinquent installments of special assessments certified for collection with real estate taxes payable in years prior to the year of Closing together with penalty interest and costs shall be paid by Seller not later than the Date of Closing B Real Estate Taxes Payable in the Year of Closing Real estate taxes payable in the year of Closing shall be paid by Seller Seller shall pay penalty interest and costs 135745 1 127 on any delinquent installment of taxes and special assessments payable in the year of Closing The parties understand that the legal description in this Purchase Agreement is a new description requiring a subdivision ofland owned by Seller This lot split will require that the full year s taxes be paid before the deed can be recorded 6 SELLER S BOUNDARY LINE ACCESS RESTRICTIONS AND LIEN WARRANTIES Seller warrants that buildings on adjoining real property if any are entirely outside of the boundary lines of the property Seller warrants that there has been no labor or material furnished to the property for which payment has not been made Seller warrants that there are no present violations of any restrictions relating to the use or improvement of the property These warranties shall survive the delivery of the Warranty Deed 7 CONDITION OF PROPERTY 135745 A Seller shall remove all debris and all personal property not included in this sale from the property before possession date B Seller knows of no hazardous substances or petroleum products having been placed stored or released from or on the property by any person in violation of any law nor of any underground storage tanks having been located on the property at any time Seller warrants and represents to Buyer that there have been no acts or occurrences upon the property that have caused or could cause hazardous substances or petroleum products to be released or discharged into the subsoil or ground water of the property or other property in the area Seller represents and warrants to Buyer that the property is free of hazardous substances and is not subject to any superfund type liens or claims by governmental regulatory agencies or third parties arising from the release or threatened release of hazardous substances in on or about the property Seller shall indemnify and hold Buyer harmless from any and all claims causes of action damages losses or costs including lawyer s fees relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the subsoil or ground water of the property or other property in the area which arise from or are caused by acts or occurrences upon the property prior to Buyer taking possession These warranties and indemnifications shall survive the delivery of the Warranty Deed C Seller s warranties and representations contained in this Section 6 shall survive the delivery of the Deed provided that any notice of a defect or claim of breach of warranty must be in writing and must be given by Buyer to Seller within one year of the Date of Closing or be deemed waived D Buyer shall have he right to have inspections of the property conducted prior to closing Unless required by local ordinance or lending regulations Seller does not plan to have the property inspected Other than the representations made in this Section the property is being sold AS IS with no express or implied representations or warranties by Seller as to physical conditions or fitness for any particular purpose 2 128 8 POSSESSION Seller shall deliver possession ofthe property not later than the actual Date of Closing 9 NOTICES All notices required herein shall be in writing and delivered personally or mailed to the last known address and ifmailed are effective as ofthe date of mailing 10 MINNESOTA LAW This contract is governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota 11 WELL DISCLOSURE Seller certifies that Seller does not know of any wells on the property 12 CLOSING Closing shall be at Chanhassen City Hall 13 CLOSING DOCUMENTS A At the Closing Seller shall execute and or deliver to Buyer the following collectively the Closing Documents 135745 1 Varrantv Deed A Warranty Deed in recordable form which shall include the following hazardous mateIja1 and well representations a Grantor has not used the Property for the storage or disposal of any hazardous substance as defined in Minn Stat 115B 02 subd 8 and b Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described Property 2 Seller s Affidavit A standard form affidavit by Seller indicating that on the date of Closing there are no outstanding unsatisfied judgments tax liens or bankruptcies against or involving Seller or the Property that there has been no skill labor or material furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made or for which mechanic s liens could be filed except for any skill labor material requested by Buyer and that to the best of Seller s knowledge there are no other unrecorded interests in the Property 3 Non Foreign Person Certification A certification in form and content satisfactory to the parties hereto and their counsel properly executed by Seller containing such information as shall be required by the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations issued thereunder in order to establish that Seller is not a foreign person as defined in 1445 f 3 of such Code and such regulations 4 Well Certificate Ifthere is a well located on the Property a well disclosure certificate in form and substance true to form for recording 3 129 01 30 2008 10 13 13603782431 POST SAN JUAN PAGE 05 05 5 Other Documents All other documents rensonably determined by either party and the title insurance company to be necessary to transfer and provide title insurance for the Property B At the Closing Buyer shall execute and deliver to Seller the following 1 All documents reasonably determined by either party and the title insurance company to be necessary to provide title insurance for the Property and 2 Payment ofthe Purchase Price 14 CLOSING COSTS The costs relating to the closing oftbis transaction shall be paid as follows A Buyersh lpay 1 Recording fee for the Warranty Deed 2 State deed ta1r 3 Conservation fee attributable to said deed 4 Cost of Owners and Encumbrance Report B Seller shall pay the recording fees for all documents detennined to be necessary to transfer marketable title to the Buyer 15 PARTIES BOUND This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective heirs administrators executors successors and assigns of the parties hereto BUYER CITY OF CHANHASSEN By SELLER Tom Furlong Mayor dd PI ack O Christenson j Patricia A Christenson And Todd Gerhardt City Manager 135745 4 130 5 Other Documents All other documents reasonably determined by either party and the title insurance company to be necessary to transfer and provide title insurance for the Property B At the Closing Buyer shall execute and deliver to Seller the following 1 All documents reasonably determined by either party and the title insurance company to be necessary to provide title insurance for the Property and 2 Payment of the Purchase Price 14 CLOSING COSTS The costs relating to the closing of this transaction shall be paid as follows A Buyer shall pay 1 Recording fee for the Warranty Deed 2 State deed tax 3 Conservation fee attributable to said deed 4 Cost of Owners and Encumbrance Report B Seller shall pay the recording fees for all documents determined to be necessary to transfer marketable title to the Buyer 15 PARTIES BOUND This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective heirs administrators executors successors and assigns of the parties hereto BUYER CITY OF CHANHASSEN SELLER By Tom Furlong Mayor Jack D Christenson And Todd Gerhardt City Manager Patricia A Christenson 135745 4 131 Reserved for Recording Data WARRANTY DEED STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON 95 76 Dated 2008 FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION JACKD CHRISTENSON AND PATRICIA A CHRISTENSON husband and wife Grantors hereby convey and warrant to the CITY OF CHANHASSEN a Minnesota municipal corporation Grantee real property in Carver County Minnesota described as follows That part of Lot 1 Block 2 CHAN HAYEN PLAZA Carver County Minnesota described as follows Beginning at the southeast comer of said Lot 1 thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 1 a distance of210 00 feet thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of281 81 feet thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of25 00 feet to the north line of said Lot 1 thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of281 84 feet thence South 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 163 50 feet thence 47 17 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a central angle of 12 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds and a radius of 220 00 feet to the northeast comer of said Lot 1 thence South 00 degrees 48 minutes 27 seconds West along the east line of said Lot 1 a distance of 30 04 feet to the point of beginning together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto subject to the following exceptions a b c Covenants conditions restrictions declarations and easements of record if any Reservations of minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota if any and Building and zoning laws ordinances state and federal regulations 135749 1 132 THE GRANTORS CERTIFY THAT THE GRANTORS DO NOT KNOW OF ANY WELLS ON THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY Jack D Christenson Patricia A Christenson STATEOFMINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2008 by Jack D Christ nson and Patricia A Christenson husband and wife Grantors Notary Public Check here if part or all of the land is Registered Torrens Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan Minnesota 55121 651 452 5000 TMS cjh 135749 2 133 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF AFFIDAVIT REGARDING SELLER Jack D Christenson being first duly sworn on oath says that 1 He is the person named as one of the Grantors in the Warranty Deed dated 2008 and filed for record 2008 as Document No in the Office of the County Recorder of Carver County Minnesota 2 Said person is oflegal age is married to Patricia A Christenson and is under no legal disability and for the last ten years has resided at 27q Smugglers Cove Road Friday Harbor Washington 98250 8539 3 There has been no a Banlauptcy divorce or dissolution proceedings involving said person during the time said person has had any interest in the premises described in the above document Premises b Unsatisfied judgments of record against said person nor any actions pending in any courts which affect the Premises and c Tax liens against said person except as herein stated NONE 4 Any banlauptcy divorce or dissolution proceedings of record against parties with the same or similar names during the time period in which the above named person has had any interest in the Premises are not against the above named person 5 Any judgments or tax liens of record against parties with the same or similar names are not against the above named person 6 There has been no labor or materials furnished to the Premises for which payment has not been made 7 There are no unrecorded contracts leases easements or other agreements or interests relating to the Premises except as stated herein 8 There are no persons in possession of any portion of the Premises other than pursuant to a recorded document except as stated herein 135891 134 9 There are no encroachments or boundary line questions affecting the Premises of which Affiant has knowledge Affiant knows the matters herein stated are true and makes this Affidavit for the purpose of inducing the passing of title to the Premises Jack D Christenson Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 2008 Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFfED BY CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Attorneys at Law 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan Minnesota 55121 651 452 5000 TMS cjh 135891 135 CERTIFICATE OF REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES THE UNDERSIGNED Sellers under that certain Vacant Land Purchase Agreement dated 2008 Purchase Agreement with the City of Chanhassen a Minnesota municipal corporation Buyer hereby certifies that the representations and warranties of Sellers set forth in said Purchase Agreement are true as of 2008 which is the closing date SELLERS Jack D Christenson Patricia A Christenson 135893 136 NON FOREIGN AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 1445 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE BY JACK D CHRISTENSON AND PATRICIA A CHRISTENSON HUSBAND AND WIFE AS SELLERS UNDER THAT CERTAIN VACANT LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT DATED 2008 YITH THE CITY OF CHANHASSEN AS BUYER Section 1445 ofthe Internal Revenue Code provides that a transferee of a U S real property interest must hold withholding tax ifthe transferor is a foreign person To inform the transferee that withholding of tax is not required upon the disposition ofa U S real property interest by Jack D Christenson and Patricia A Christenson husband and wife the undersigned hereby make the following Affidavit 1 Jack D Christenson and Patricia A Christenson are not foreign persons foreign corporation foreign partnership foreign trust or foreign estate as those terms are defined in the Internal Revenue Code and Income Tax Regulations 2 Jack D Christenson s Social Security Number is Patricia A Christenson s Social Security Number is 3 Jack D Christenson and Patricia A Christenson s principal address is 15411 Village Woods Drive Eden Prairie Minnesota 55347 The undersigned understand that this Affidavit may be disclosed to the Internal Revenue Service by the transferee and that any false statement contained herein could be punished by fine or imprisonment or both FURTHER YOUR AFFIANT SAITH NOT Jack D Christenson Patricia A Christenson 135894 1 137 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2008 by Jack D Christenson and Patricia A Christenson husband and wife Notary Public TillS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Attorneys at Law 317 Eagaridale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan Minnesota 55121 651 452 5000 TMS cjh 135894 2 138 PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE Date FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION the real property in Carver County Minnesota legally described as follows See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference is hereby released from the lien of the Real Estate Mortgage OWNED BY THE UNDERSIGNED dated July 24 2000 executed by JACK DEAN CHRISTENSON and PATRICIA ANN CHRISTENSON husband and wife as Mortgagors to STATE BANK OF CHANHASSEN now known as KLEINBANK a Minnesota corporation as Mortgagee filed for record on July 25 2000 as Document No A272493 in the office of the County Recorder Carver County Minnesota KLEINBANK By Its 136546 1 139 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2008 by the of KleinBank a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the corporation Notary Public This Instrument was Drafted by CAMPBELL KNUTSON P A Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan MN 55121 651 452 5000 AMP cjh 136546 2 140 EXHIBIT A TO PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE That part of Lot 1 Block 2 CHAN HAVEN PLAZA Carver County Minnesota described as follows Beginning at the southeast comer of said Lot 1 thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 1 a distance of210 00 feet thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of281 81 feet thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of25 00 feet to the north line of said Lot 1 thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of281 84 feet thence South 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 163 50 feet thence 47 17 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a central angle of 12 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds and a radius of 220 00 feet to the northeast comer of said Lot 1 thence South 00 degrees 48 minutes 27 seconds West along the east line of said Lot 1 a distance of30 04 feet to the point of beginning 136546 3 141 PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGES Date FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION the real property in Carver County Minnesota legally described as follows See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference is hereby released from the lien of the following Real Estate Mortgages owned by the undersigned 1 Mortgage dated July 1 2004 filed for record July 12 2004 as Document No A39l422 executed by Jack D Christenson and Patricia A Christenson husband and wife to Community National Bank now known as Community Resource Bank a Minnesota corporation 2 Mortgage dated July 1 2004 filed for record July 16 2004 as Document No A391921 executed by Jack D Christenson and Patricia A Christenson husband and wife to Community National Bank now known as Community Resource Bank a Minnesota corporation and 3 Mortgage dated July 6 2006 filed for record August 7 2006 as Document No A446986 executed by Jack D Christenson and Patricia A Christenson husband and wife to Community Resource Bank a Minnesota corporation COMMUNITY RESOURCE BANK By Its 136547 1 142 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2008 by the of Community Resource Bank a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the corporation This Instrument was Drafted by CAMPBELL KNUTSON P A Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan MN 55121 651 452 5000 AMP cjh 136547 Notary Public 2 143 EXHmIT A TO PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGES That part of Lot 1 Block 2 CHAN HAYEN PLAZA Carver County Minnesota described as follows Beginning at the southeast comer of said Lot 1 thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 1 a distance of210 00 feet thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of281 81 feet thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of25 00 feet to the north line of said Lot 1 thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of281 84 feet thence South 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 163 50 feet thence 47 17 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a central angle of 12 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds and a radius of220 00 feet to the northeast comer of said Lot 1 thence South 00 degrees 48 minutes 27 seconds West along the east line of said Lot 1 a distance of 30 04 feet to the point of beginning 136547 3 144 PARTIAL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS Date FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION the real property in Carver County Minnesota legally described as follows See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference is hereby released from the lien of the Assignment of Leases and Rents owned by the undersigned dated July 1 2004 executed by JACK D CHRISTENSON and PATRICIA A CHRISTENSON husband and wife as Assignors to COMMUNITY NATIONAL BANK now known as COMMUNITY RESOURCE BANK a Minnesota corporation as Lender filed for record on July 16 2004 as Document No A391922 in the office of the County Recorder Carver County Minnesota COMMUNITY RESOURCE BANK By Its 136551 1 145 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2008 by the of Community Resource Bank a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the corporation This Instrument was Drafted by CAMPBELL KNUTSON P A Suite 317 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan MN 55121 651 452 5000 AMP cjh 136551 Notary Public 2 146 EXHmIT A TO PARTIAL RELEASE OF ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS That part of Lot 1 Block 2 CHAN HAVEN PLAZA Carver County Minnesota described as follows Beginning at the southeast comer of said Lot 1 thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 1 a distance of210 00 feet thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of281 81 feet thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of 25 00 feet to the north line of said Lot 1 thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of281 84 feet thence South 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 163 50 feet thence 47 17 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a central angle of 12 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds and a radius of220 00 feet to the northeast comer of said Lot 1 thence South 00 degrees 48 minutes 27 seconds West along the east line of said Lot 1 a distance of 30 04 feet to the point ofbeginning 136551 3 147 PARTIAL RELEASE OF DCC FINANCING STATEMENT 2008 That certain DCC Financing Statement executed by Jack D Christenson as Debtor and Community National Bank now known as Community Resource Bank as Secured Party and filed for record November 10 2005 as Document No A428700 in the Office of the County Recorder of Carver County Minnesota is with the indebtedness thereby partially paid The Secured Party releases that part of the UCC Financing Statement described on Exhibit A attached hereto from the lien of said UCC Financing Statement This Partial Release leaves said DCC Financing Statement in full force as to the remaining property described therein COMMUNITY RESOURCE BANK By Its 136552 1 148 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF CARVER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on 2008 by the of Community Resource Bank a Minnesota corporation on behalf of said corporation Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Attorneys at Law 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan Minnesota 55121 651 452 5000 TMS cjh 136552 2 149 EXHIBIT A TO PARTIAL RELEASE OF DCC FINANCING STATEMENT That part of Lot 1 Block 2 CHAN HAVEN PLAZA Carver County Minnesota described as follows Beginning at the southeast comer of said Lot 1 thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 1 a distance of21O 00 feet thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of281 81 feet thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of25 00 feet to the north line of said Lot 1 thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of281 84 feet thence South 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 163 50 feet thence 47 17 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a central angle of 12 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds and a radius of220 00 feet to the northeast comer of said Lot 1 thence South 00 degrees 48 minutes 27 seconds West along the east line of said Lot 1 a distance of 30 04 feet to the point of beginning 136552 3 150 EXHIBIT P LD 251750030 OWNER JACK D CHRISTINSON ACQUISITION CHANHASSEN MN AREA 12 377 Sq Ft 0 2841 acres Acquisition Area That port of Lot 1 Block 2 CHAN HAVEN PLAZA Carver County Minnesota described os fonows Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 1 thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along the south line of said Lot 1 a distance of 210 00 feet thence North 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 281 81 feet thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 42 seconds East a distance of 25 00 feet to the north line of said Lot 1 thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East 0 distance of 281 84 feet thence South 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 163 50 feet thence 47 17 feet olong 0 tangential curve concave to the north having a central angle of 12 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds and a radius of 220 00 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 1 thence South 00 degrees 48 minutes 27 seconds West along the east line of said Lot 1 a distance of 30 04 to the point of beginning I A j J I J I lJ t J J DRIVE EAST L 47 1 I Ton 2 6 1 2 7 05 I R 220J O o ci 1 i N89 4S JS W w 8 ri gN z I SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 ACQUISITION AREA l LEGEND CERTIFICATION NOT TO SCALE I hereby certify that this survey plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota v i J 7 0 II J Vf f V rviN License No 14677 111 r D HANSEN THORP PELLlNEN OLSON Inc 7510 Markel Plac Drive Eden Pralrle MN 55344 952 629 0700 952 829 78C6 fax Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 151 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site www ci chanhassen mn us 1c MEMORANDUM TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager Karen J Engelhardt Office Manager I February 11 2008 Approval Temporary On Sale Liquor License Harvest Festival August 16 17 St Hubert Catholic Community 8201 Main Street FROM DA TE SUBJ St Hubert Catholic Community has submitted an application for a temporary on sale liquor license for their annual Harvest Festival on August 16 17 2008 They intend to sell beer and wine on the church grounds at 8201 Main Street St Hubert s has received this license annually for many years without any incidents Two uniformed police officers will be on duty Saturday evening August 16 and one uniformed officer will be present on Sunday August 17 RECOMMENDA TION Staff recommends approval of the request from St Hubert Catholic Community for a temporary on sale liquor license for their Harvest Festival on August 16 17 2008 contingent upon receipt of liquor liability insurance covering the event The City ot Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a chamning downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play G user KAREN L1QUOR st hubert harvest festival doc 152 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site www ci chanhassen mn us 1 cL MEMORANDUM TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager FROM y O Paul Oehme Dir of Public Works City Engineer DATE February 11 2008 O SUBJ Approve Condemnation Resolution for Lyman Boulevard Improvements Project No 06 03 REQUESTED ACTION Approve resolution authorizing condemnation of land Lyman Boulevard Improvements pubic purposes for the BACKGROUND the Lyman At the November 13 2007 Council work session Boulevard roadway agreement with Council Lyman BoulevardJor Phase 1 to On December 10 2007 Council project On January 28 2008 the Council Boulevard for Phase 1 BACKGROUND Currently Carver County is working on Boulevard from Galpin Boulevard projectwill widen Lyman Boulevard from a divided roadway section with turn lanes anticipated future traffic for the corridor construction starting in June 2008 proposed at this time to accommodate the projected from the Chanhassen High School with project is Boulevard The roadway project will require right of way to be acquired to accommodate the wider street width Carver County is completing a right of way plat for the project The roadway agreeIll f rtp g pje ctstip ates Chanhassen and Chaska will acquire the property F u ll fingfor the right of way is to be paid for as stipulated in the roadway agreement The City of Chanhassen will be responsible for 45 of the roadway costs Carver County 45 and City of Chaska 10 The The City 01 Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a Charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 153 Todd Gerhardt Approve Condemnation Resolution for Lyman Blvd Imp February 11 2008 Page 2 estimated cost for right of way is 900 000 Staff is currently obtaining appraisals for the properties in Chanhassen At this time the only properties that should need to be acquired are the properties at the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Audubon South CCSAR 17 and the property directly south of the intersection of Lyman Boulevard and Galpin Boulevard CCSAR 19 The property owners have been made aware of the project and that an offer for the properties will be forthcoming In the event that a reasonable offer cannot be negotiated a condemnation proceeding may be necessary Staff would like to avoid this option if at all possible but the City should keep all options open Condemnation proceedings take approximately four months to complete To keep the project on schedule these proceedings need to start soon Also MnDOT may not allow for this project to be bid until all the necessary properties are acquired since state aid funds are involved Attachments Resolution Map c Tom Scott Campbell Knutson P A G ENGIPUBLIC 2006 Projects 06 03 Lyman Imp Powers to TH 41 021108 appv condemresolution doc 154 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA DATE Februrarv 11 2008 RESOLUTION NO 2008 MOTION BY SECONDED BY RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES CITY PROJECT NO 06 03 WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Chanhassen does hereby determine that it is necessary and for a public use and purpose to acquire easements over the property identified on the attached Exhibit A subject to engineering modifications if any for purposes in connection with the Lyman Boulevard Project No 06 03 and WHEREAS City staff and consultants have and will continue to work with the property owners to acquire the necessary easements and WHEREAS the City Council finds that development and construction conditions related to the area make it necessary to acquire title to and possession of the easements as soon as possible in order for the project to proceed in an efficient cost effective and expeditious manner NOW THEREFORE be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Chanhassen Minnesota 1 That the City Attorney is authorized to commence eminent domain proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117 to acquire the necessary easements over the property identified on the attached Exhibit A subject to engineering modifications if needed 2 That the City Attorney is authorized to acquire the necessary property interest pursuant to the quick take provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 117 042 3 That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary in the opinion of the City Attorney to effect the acquisition of the necessary property interests 1 155 4 The City has obtained appraisals of the property being acquired The Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to approve the appraisals and continue negotiations with the property owners relating to the acquisition of the easements Passed and adopted by the Chanhassen City Council this 11th day of February 2008 ATTEST Todd Gerhardt City Manager Thomas A Furlong Mayor YES NO ABSENT 2 156 EXHIBIT A Parcel 4F Merle and Jane V olk c o Verizon Wireless PIN No 25 8110240 Parcel4F Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota ParcelS Delores B Holasek Trustee and Delores B Holasek Life Estate PIN No 25 0210100 ParcelS Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota Parcel SA Delores B Holasek Trustee PIN No 25 0210100 Parcel5A Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota Parcel 14 Dean and Lois Degler Trustee PIN No 25 0220800 Parcel 14 Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota Parcel14A Dean and Lois Degler Trustee PIN No 30 0220100 Parcel 14A Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota Parcels 17 Dean and Lois Degler Trustee PIN No 25 0220800 Parcel 17 Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota 3 157 Parcels 17 A Dean and Lois Degler Trustee PIN No 25 0220800 Parcel 17 A Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota Parcels 17B Dean and Lois Degler Trustee PIN No 25 0220800 Parcel 17B Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota Parcels 22 Dean and Lois Degler Trustee PIN No 25 0220800 Parcel 22 Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota Parcels 24 Eric S Kathleen A Theship Rosales PIN No 25 0220400 Parcel 24 Carver County Right of Way Plat No 17 Carver County Minnesota 4 158 Note This isa preliminary copy of an unrecorded proposed plat and is subject to change without notice I D I I i 1 @ iJ 1i I 1 I i o 0 HH I g gr i 8 0 a i 2 ii g 8 if oiD S il 3 f 3 g U I g i li a r 3 if 0 il 3 f l il i c i O 1i f s a I 1 9 c z fI g 3 i fI if fi J 3 1 i i 3 0 s g o fDseOl z c I U1 iti Jc li h I I 1ii io I m b m z 0 c m m m c lj il a P bll ll l bIbI u i silo s nri ih ill iDCl 81 t l5 nz bI I m Q i l i 8 gil j m m 10 m 0 E n m Ill j Eil o lJ Ill 1 V 4 I I 0 I v l I I A 52 C l J CJI j ji c 11 oo J I ZOO1CJ I V r I I m L I I I I D ft r iH zl l Z iff g i i rf uuuuumu lEi l Rf21 0 H mmiH m H iH z al 0 i ii g la rgio i U 8t 11 C i i l8il1 lIlilU i llli f J i t ill 0 Ill 33 3 H u z u o1 H i UU ci B l l i lm l rii i nlnl 0 i li N m ij OJ m z Ii III l 11 g III ill iI is g m i l l11 l l1 l1 n J 0 III III Ii i z i t 0 6 1 1 3 o 9t U 0 o f T I r J1 M e 7 7 7 PRELIMINARY 0 m 0 o o c z J t J 244888 0 0 J r J m aJ OV C 1 8 r 0 CI J I E J CC I 1I 1 fT1 ol o Q 1J Z 0 O r r cb tt r I J C 0 n en d J I I E U r I Z o 1 C 7 7 1 V 7 7 1r o c j m J gliiliji 8 jj a iI g s g3 il i Wi h l jls itj ih Ii ilP 8 1 h cl liiSCIo 3 6 ii g f t13 i i Its i g 8 c i t 1l R O rt l igl Q 188 0 g ig i 1 1 2 r 3 Jl fi gi ilc l Hh iciQ i l H g c a f 1J J I 0 1 r C 0 I b C i 1 I 1J 0 C I 1 j s 7 7 1 5 U 5 l e iI g J 3 m l i c U 0 o f T I r if i if f I Q 09 ii It I 9 J i o 3 C I 7 L J r l 7 L y l a I g OJ C J 7 L t r l J 7 r1 1 U i cl l ifa Ii f l ii 9 S if Ii i i a lO l im 1 s8 8 c m il gc n 1ii1Oz 0 li5Jl l5 oz zz o w i g b m il9 1 5 l H I o ffi t C Z Q o l g l l ffl83 It cm c i J 0 0 U 0 I r 1 0 0 0 0 CJ 0 0 r fTl z Z z 9 9 9 159 Note This isa preliminary copy of an unrecorded proposed plat and is subject to change without notice I i 1 K @ f i II If fjj I Q fo 0 l lPP lf 01 g g I 0 BB I Q il i 1 S f h f e 3 01 i i l H b f 3 r a 0 i i III 3 ig gl 9 c c z 3 if 3 il ll L if f j m 0 3 o 11 o o Z CD I U1 p Io N roOCD Q i J J i o U a 1 p Xl i I 2 m 2 oo d p a i J J i l i mOl N i5 ll p a 1 LI t J 0 il JI f fliT fi 1 I I t b I J4 I I C 1 1 J I G I l ii1 0 1110 Ci J C Jf I l I 1 I I it I I g I it I I iiI I iiI g o I I 40 I I 0 I L j lm m J I OJ O o g JLJ r r S m l J Q 0 i ft UI 9 ilr 0 i t h 8 5 0 m l il z fU i f I PRELIMINARY a l 1 l l aC tJ J C 1 UU H U U UUIH mm H U a Co fDO aJ c l iii ill e g S fDt St6 III w i1l U iili m 88 1 l i C 01 I H lInn H l H l l lm 1 on l c i u w III U m iij 11 j l l m z 1l f m Ii l g Cl 1lI l l i l lil it m s e m II 8 8l l 8 ill ill 0 U O I l 01 Z m m l I J J 7 v o A r J r 0 7 1 v I J J i CO J 7 i 1 5 Ii L 10 I I I I 7 7 1 v I J J 7 7 I i I II l II fI Qa 1 tg I I 1 3 I I I I I I I of J 0 Z f S I U10 U Ai o TJ r 1 l l aC C 1 l i D m D o o c z U D D me rI I 2 0 ll D U r I Z o J 0 a U a r 1 0 0 0 0 J 0 r TJ Z Z z 9 9 9 160 Note This isa preliminary copy of an unrecorded proposed plat and is subject to change without notice PRELIMINARY I l 1 i 1 K @ f 71 1 I g p illf aJ B 3 J 2 0 1 l U ll un oil s e 5 1 f g c 3 g m tiS f g i lia f 0 I m I iHi r c5 CD I l 3 g gI f c I z 3 if 3 a m if ie s q g a 9 ga a 7 IJ m IJ o Match Line B 0 Sheet 2 02 93 i T Jr C iiI l lXI Pi I 1 1 Z 20 ti I I j m i i 1 I I I ill I I i i r c TI II 5 145 I IJ A J I 0 I m C j20 pi t i r I I C I 0 0 p OJI i iJ I 50 OJ I 1 I I ci Z 0 I I ft g2 39 E I M lJ I ujl 0 II I d I t i I I l I I E I r I I I i ot i i to C i i i i lJ p 125 U 0 0 7 r I I fTl Lr J I J I r S I q 1 I ror J g J v j 7 Z t 0 1 CJ el i eJ 7 0 t U CJ Ie i 5 I g 1 1 I r I I 1 to I 25 1 i I I I I I I I 1t l ro j o O I HH H il 5il1e j U Ui lil i g iIl ii ii2 aliLt l t E 2 m m 3 lIS ill bi 8i lilU8 8ititiBill m m 0 I zU B Ilil lil I J n I I Ii nl m m 0 m i i i il Iii z i is O it C i lil ill i it is m IU i g 888 8 8 i l n U 1 Ill i z A r 7 1 I r t 1 1 C v r IAJ I c I J I 0 4 NO 0 V011 J AL 1 rTJ 0 I i OJ lJ g OJ It t 57t I Ill lI L 2 I r Ill E tt L Iln 1 1 11 1 1 lJl lII AUO Ji PARCc n V O I cL 27 I Ill a t Iv J OAO Q I H PARCECi 2 9 g in b 1J I l JE TE t I I V TE re l f gtJ010 tlI t 1l1 1 E r 6 57 orth South Quarter Line 2458 91 m CD p CI I t J I 0 I 0 0 I g g r r 1 N N A L po C J @C v a w i oCloUl JloOlml RM i aI 1 V 7 7 J 1 7 g t l U i l Ei 8 0I1 l li kl j 5 IJ II h 1l E IT T 5 iilS VUll VI r1 g 011 I 1 qt I I b I 01 g 3 1 D 1 r r I 1 D I I II I i Ii U ft U l l 8 il I I i Z Co IIi il CO i Ii II Ill tl i g i i p ill TI c 0 0 0 0 I r i 0 0 0 0 2J 0 0 r fTl Z Z z 9 9 9 161 a J C DO if l l r D Legend @ Signals Pedestrian Underpass Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 November 6 2007 u FidPi l I I Chanhassen q V i9 V K A Nature i cIi tL I I 0 r J f L l I o Preserve l C J 1 J L 16 I 6 0 hJ l 1 Ik 1 I V j 0 rlC 6 J i I LL Yr j v q jI j r R ii r r ifi5 L ij v t t I Bl ff fL J I g iii i3Lr Q co 1 C ihj I creek fir J L J l r I V I Q tf L MIIUillilj1t 7j J 2 f r 0 rd l L 1 I r rlas y Q r 1 J VI lJ r 1 V 1 a rI I I t t I ha I po 7 ill o ii lp k r 1 J 71 1 O C J C O Q I b l r1 or a t tj lJ J 1 IA I G IEng I Joleen IEngProjects lPaulI LymonStreetImprovement lIymon phase 162 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site VN W ci chanhassen mn us d MEMORANDUM TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager FROM Bob Generous Senior Planner DATE 6 February 11 2008 SUBJ Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 Site Plan Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant is requesting site plan approval for a one story 50 000 square foot office warehouse building ACTION REQUIRED City Council approval requires a majority of City Council present PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 15 2008 to review the proposed development The Planning Commission voted unanimously four for and none against a motion recommending approval of the site plan The Planning Commission minutes are item la of the February 11 2008 City Council agenda The only area of discussion regarding the project was the visibility of the building from the comer of Lyman Boulevard CSAH 18 and Galpin Boulevard CSAH 19 This site is going to be highly visible It did not look like there was going to be a tremendous amount of landscaping added in the front of the building The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees in the buffer yard plantings along the south and east property lines but falls short on shrub quantities Staff recommended that shrub quantities be increased to meet minimum requirements However the Planning Commission did state that it is a very attractively designed building and it will finish off that development quite nicely RECOMMENDA TION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the motion as specified on pages 11 13 in the staff report dated January 15 2008 approving the site plan for a 50 000 square foot office warehouse building ATTACHMENT Planning Commission Staff Report Dated January 15 2008 g plan 2007 planning cases 07 27 business impact group snap titness executive summary doc The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 163 z u 7JJ PC DATE 01 15 08 w CC DATE 02 11 08 CITY OF CHANHASSEN REVIEW DEADLINE February 29 2008 CASE 07 27 BY AF BG TJ ML JM JS STAFF REPORT PROPOSAL Request for BUSINESS IMPACT GROUP SNAP FITNESS Request for Site Plan Review for a 50 000 square foot office warehouse building LOCATION 2411 Galpin Court Lot 1 Block 2 Chanhassen West Business Park APPLICANT Eden Trace Corp 8156 Mallory Court Chanhassen MN 55317 952 361 0722 mark@edentrace com PRESENT ZONING PUD Planned Unit Development OfficelIndustrial District 2020 LAND USE PLAN Office Industrial ACREAGE 3 8 acres DENSITY F A R 0 3 SUMMARY OF REQUEST The developer is proposing a one story 50 000 square foot office warehouse building LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING The City s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with Zoning Ordinance requirements If it meets those standards the City must then approve the site plan This is a quasi judicial decision 164 Location Map Business impact Group Snap Fitness 2411 Galpin Court City of Chanhassen Planning Case 07 27 i e 0 S 0 Z 0 jJ Subject 0 Property Lyman Blvd C R 18 SCAtHlED 165 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 2 of 13 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The applicant is requesting site plan approval for a one story 50 000 square foot office warehouse building The property to the north across Galpin Court is a vacant parcel within the Chanhassen West Business Park Planned Unit Development PUD The property to the east across Galpin Boulevard is a residential single family subdivision Stone Creek The property to the south across Lyman Boulevard contains the Holasek nursery which is currently zoned Agricultural Estate District and is guided for Office Industrial use Both Galpin Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard are classified as minor arterial roadways in the City of Chanhassen Comprehensive Plan Minor arterial roadways are intended and designed to carry higher traffic volumes The building to the west is a condominium office warehouse building within the Chanhassen West Business Park i Overall Site Plan UI J o Ide i Water and sewer service was provided to the site as part of the Chanhassen West Business Park development Access to the site is from Galpin Court via a shared driveway private street with the building to the west A grouping of trees is being preserved along Galpin Boulevard These trees were shown as being preserved as part of the original subdivision of the site Pedestrian access is being provided from the site to the City trail on Galpin Boulevard Staff is recommending that an additional connection be provided to Lyman Boulevard to access the future trail on Lyman Boulevard Subject to the revisions recommended in this report the proposed development complies with all zoning regulations PUD standards and site plan review requirements and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Staff is recommending approval of the site plan subject to the conditions of this staff report APPLICABLE REGUA TIONS Chapter 20 Article II Division 6 Site Plan Review Chapter 20 Article XXIII Division 7 Design Standards for Commercial Industrial and Office Institutional Developments Chanhassen West Business Park Development Design Standards BACKGROUND On April 10 2006 the Chanhassen City Council approved the following The Chanhassen West Business Park PUD Amendment for a 20 foot parking setback from Lyman Boulevard right of way for Lots 1 and 2 Block 2 Chanhassen West Business Park 166 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 3 of 13 Site Plan 06 11 for a 49 105 square foot office warehouse building for the site immediately to the west of the site under review On September 29 2005 the Chanhassen City Council approved the final plat for Chanhassen West Business Park creating 8 lots 3 outlots and associated right of way for public streets On August 22 2005 the Chanhassen City Council approved the following Rezoning of the property located within the Chanhassen West Business Park from Agricultural Estate District A 2 to Planned Unit Development PUD incorporating the development design standards contained within the staff report Preliminary Plat for Chanhassen West Business Park plans prepared by Schoell Madson Inc dated June 17 2005 and Wetland Alteration Permit to fill and alter wetlands within the development plans prepared by Schoell Madson Inc dated June 17 2005 GENERAL SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURAL COMPLIANCE i B o o h 9 9 4 TH ELE n u T E E n 0 f I I t b R Q 9 H n Size Portion Placement The building has two main entrances with one on the east side of the building and one on the south side of the building The entrances are emphasized through the use of projecting columns and the extension of the stone veneer to the roof Additionally copper colored arched metal canopies are located over the entrances These canopies are also included over the three paned storefront windows interspersed on the south side and southeast comer of the building 167 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 4 of 13 Building articulation is accomplished though the use of multiple materials use of windows and entrances providing stone veneer columns at regular intervals and the stepping back of the building along the eastern elevation Material and detail Building materials consist of burnished rock faced and single scored burnished block stone veneer cement window headers and sills aluminum window and door frames metal canopies and steel columns and wall caps Color The primary building color is Swiss chocolate dark brown with brown entry columns and wall caps and amber bronze window and door frames Corbelling at the top of the parapet incorporates bands of desert sand tan and Cotswold stone rust Window headers and sills are limestone colored The canopies as well as metal accent bands in columns are copper colored The stone veneer along the bases and in the columns and at the entries mix tan bronze and red Height and Roof Design Building height is 24 feet to the top of the parapet except in the entry area columns where the column height is 26 feet Pitched roof elements consist of the arched canopies over the entries Mechanical equipment shall be screened through the use oflow profile units and placement away from the edges of the roof Facade Transparency The building includes transparent windows and or doors in all office and showroom areas of the building Additionally decorative windows are proposed on the upper level windows throughout the building All other areas shall include landscaping material and architectural detailing and articulation For buildings with a use or function that does not readily allow windows e g cooler or freezer areas mechanical rooms security areas storage areas or warehouse or manufacturing space in commercial or industrial buildings the fenestration standards may be reduced However the architecture detailing must be provided by the use of upper level windows the use of spandrel glass or architectural detailing which provides arches patterning recesses and shadowing that provide aesthetic interest I 168 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 5 of 13 To continue the patterning and detailing of the building staff is proposing that the following be added to the building Two upper level windows shall be added on the west end of the south building elevation in the garage area A column shall be added in the middle of the north building elevation in the warehouse area of the building Site Furnishing The developer is connecting the site to the public trail on Galpin Boulevard The developer should also provide a pedestrian connection from the site to Lyman Boulevard for connection to the future trail on Lyman Boulevard Pedestrian ramps shall be installed at all curbs along this pathway The developer should provide benches and or picnic tables for employees Loading Areas Refuse Area etc Loading docks are located to the west of the building in a truck park area established in conjunction with the building to the west Trash containers are proposed to be located within the building near the drive in overhead doors Landscaping Minimum requirements for landscaping include 5 254 square feet oflandscaped area around the parking lot 11 landscape islands or peninsulas 21 trees for the parking lot and bufferyard plantings along the south and east property lines The applicant s proposed as compared to the requirements for landscape area and parking lot trees is shown in the following table Required Proposed Vehicular use landscape area 5 254 sq ft 49 850 sq ft Trees parking lot 21 overstory trees 21 overstory trees Islands parking lot 11 islands or peninsulas 12 islands peninsulas The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees and landscaping in the parking lot area Required Plantings Proposed Plantings Bufferyard C south 12 overs tory trees 13 overstory trees property line 400 length 24 understory trees 26 understory trees 36 shrubs 21 shrubs Bufferyard C east property 12 overstory trees Existing significant trees line 420 25 understory trees 20 overstory trees 37 shrubs 33 understory trees 32 shrubs The applicant meets minimum requirements for trees in the bufferyard plantings along the south and east property lines but falls short on shrub quantities Staff recommends that shrub quantities be increased to meet minimum requirements 169 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 6 of 13 Staff recommends that all plantings along Galpin Boulevard be field located as to not damage existing plantings No trees or shrubs shall be planted within the protected area oftrees without City approval The proposed sidewalk shall not be located within the existing group of protected trees The sidewalk shall be located either north or south ofthis area with City approval All trees shown as preserved on plans dated 09 16 07 shall be protected by tree protection fencing before any construction activities begin Any trees killed or damaged shall be replaced at a rate of2 1 diameter inches Staff recommends that wood chip mulch be used around trees in all landscape peninsulas in place of sod or rocks Lot Frontage and Parking location The site fronts on three streets Galpin Court Galpin Boulevard and Lyman Boulevard Parking is distributed around the building with 23 spaces north of the building 49 east of the building and 39 south of the building LIGHTING SIGNAGE Architectural lighting is proposed exterior finish note number 23 in most ofthe column features Such lighting may only be down cast A decorative shoebox fixture high pressure sodium vapor lamps with a square ornamental pole shall be used throughout the development area for area lighting The development shows metal halide lighting which must be revised to high pressure sodium vapor All light fixtures shall be shielded The developer is showing a 6 foot 8 inch tall approximately 35 square foot monument sign in the southeast comer of the property All freestanding parcel signs shall be limited to monument signs The sign shall not exceed eighty 80 square feet in sign display area nor be greater than eight 8 feet in height The applicant is also showing wall signage at building entrances Wall signage shall comply with City Code requirements for signage in the industrial office park Sign must use individual dimension letters with a minimum of inch depth Logos may not exceed 15 percent of the signage area Wall signage shall be backlit if illuminated A separate sign permit is required for signage MISCELLANEOUS The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota Detailed occupancy related requirements will be addressed when complete plans are submitted The owner and or their representative shall meet with the Inspections Division as soon as possible to discuss plan review and permit procedures Applicant must comply with the following Fire Prevention policies a 40 1995 Fire Sprinkler requirements b 07 1991 Pre fire plan drawings c 29 1991 Premises identification 170 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 7 of 13 d 34 1993 Water service installation e 36 1994 Combination Fire Domestic water service line Applicant must fill out the Combustible Storage and High Pile Combustible Storage form The proposed fire hydrant locations are acceptable A PlY Post indicator valve is not required No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed Trees and scrubs must either be removed from site or chipped A 10 foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants A portion of the Park Dedication Fees 40 150 was paid in cash with the final plat with the remaining balance of 319 350 being paid with the building permit based on the lot area The total area of all lots within the subdivision is 28 61 acres The park fees payable with the building permit shall be 3 8 28 61 x 319 350 42 416 00 GRADING DRAINAGE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND RUNOFF The site was mass graded with the Chanhassen West Business Park development Minor grading modifications are required for the proposed building and parking area The first floor elevation of the building is consistent with the final grading plan The existing contours on the east side of the property are incomplete The proposed contours must tie into the existing contours shown on the plan Runoff from the site will be conveyed via private storm sewer to the pond located in the southwest corner of Chanhassen West Business Park The pond has been excavated and has the capacity to treat the runoff generated from this site The total land disturbance associated with the proposed project exceeds the minimum threshold for small construction activity Therefore a NPDES Phase II permit to discharge stormwater associated with construction activities is required This permit must include the General Contractor responsible for day to day operations of the site and the owner This should be noted on the SWPPP included with the plan submittal The permit must be presented at the preconstruction meeting or prior to commencement of grading activities Other amendments to Sheet C4 SWPPP are as follows 1 Under 2 Sequence of Construction Activities insert construct rain gardens after item 10 and before item 11 2 Under 3 2 Control Measures I include language that the SWPPP must be amended to indicate all dewatering activities and implemented BMPs for the dewatering Further should the dewatering exceed minimum thresholds ad DNR permit will be required and must be obtained by a responsible party 3 Under 5 1 Erosion Control Inspection include language stipulating that the SWPPP and all amendments to it shall be kept onsite in an easily accessible location known to all relevant parties 171 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 8 of 13 Sheet CI Grading and Erosion Control Plan should be amended as follows 1 Inlet protections shall be called out on all existing structures In particular the existing CBMH located at the approximate centerline of the eastern property boundary for Lot 2 Block 2 2 Erosion control blanket in the northeast comer of the project should be extended to cover all area up to that point where the proposed grades match the existing grades 3 Rain garden areas should be constructed last and those areas need to be protected during construction of the remainder of the site to prevent heavy machinery travel across these areas and the stockpiling of soils and other materials 4 Perimeter controls shall be placed around the rain garden features until the area tributaries to the rain gardens are stabilized 5 Rain gardens should be situated in relation to the curb cuts such that stormwater inputs must travel through a vegetated swale prior to entering the rain gardens This will reduce sediment entering the rain garden which could diminish the infiltration of the rain garden This swale could be maintained as turf grass Sheet LI Landscape Plan should be amended as follows 1 Calculations should be performed and provided to show that the rain gardens will drain within 48 hours and will not bounce more than one foot 2 A pre treatment filter strip or vegetated swale should be included between the curb cut and rain garden feature which is adequate to remove sediment from the runoff to prevent sediment deposition within the rain garden which diminishes infiltration rates within the surface of the rain garden 3 An emergency overflow should be provided for the rain water gardens The creation of a swale between the two gardens is strongly encouraged 4 It should be noted that woody vegetation is acceptable within rain water gardens 5 Erosion control blanket should not be placed over the infiltration surface ofthe rainwater garden 6 Shredded mulch should be placed within the rain water garden Refer to Wisconsin DNR Bioretention Design The Metropolitan Councils Minnesota Urban Small Sites BMP Manual or the Low Impact Development Design Strategies from the Prince George s County Maryland Department of Environmental Resources for additional information regarding design considerations RETAINING WALLS The plan identifies a retaining wall at the southwest comer of the building The top and bottom of wall elevations is not shown on the plans Staff estimates the maximum height of the wall to be approximately three feet Retaining walls four feet high or higher require a building permit and must be designed by an engineer registered in the State of Minnesota 172 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 9 of 13 UTILITIES Lateral sanitary sewer and watermain were installed within Galpin Court in conjunction with the Chanhassen West Business Park development One eight inch diameter watermain and one six inch diameter sanitary sewer stub were installed to the property The sanitary sewer will be extended to the north side ofthe building Eight inch watermain must be looped around the building and connect to the existing eight inch stub on the property to the west This watermain shall be privately owned and maintained Sanitary sewer and water hookup for this site were previously assessed and paid STREETS AND ACCESS Galpin Court was constructed with the Chanhassen West Business Park development The proposed building will access Galpin Court at the joint driveway with the property to the west A cross access agreement must be dedicated and a copy provided to the City before the building permit is issued PARKS DEDICATION FEE A portion of the park dedication fee for this property was collected with the development contract The remaining balance of this fee is 40 770 46 and must be paid with the building permit WETLANDS A review of available data including the Chanhassen SWMP NWI and aerial photography does not indicate the presence of any wetlands on or immediately adjacent to the subject property Further the topography ofthe area and the moderately well drained soils is such that the area would not typically support wetland characteristics Based upon review of remote sensing materials and a site visit no wetlands exist on or adjacent to the property LAKES The proposed project does not lie within 1 000 feet ofthe ordinary high water level OHW of any public waters and therefore is not within a shoreland district OTHER AGENCIES The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies and comply with their conditions of approval Included within the agency comments are the following Carver County Watershed Management Organization Pond Filtration Shelf It appears that the pond shelf is not functioning This was communicated in emai s in July and August of this year We have requested as bui ts for the shelf and have received a grading as 173 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 10 of 13 built for the pond that shows no details on the shelf Until we receive as builts and determine a correction to the filtration shelf issue no further approval of lots will be liven Carver County SWCD They had specific comments regarding the SWPPP and NPDES permit Their comments have been incorporated under the Erosion and Sediment Control and Runoff section of this memorandum COMPLIANCE TABLE pun BIG SNAP Buildin2 Building Height 3 stories 40 feet 1 story 24 feet Building Setback N 30 E 50 W 0 S 50 N 64 E 116 W 25 S 70 Parking Stalls 96 stalls 111 stalls Office 5 1 000 with 15 366 sq ft of office equals 77 stalls Warehouse 1 1 000 for first 10 000 then 1 2 000 thereafter with 27 795 sq ft of warehouse equals 19 stalls Parking Setback N 10 E 50 W 0 S 20 N 12 E 47 W 0 S 20 Hard Surface Coverage 70 70 Lot Area 1 acre 3 8 acres Plan must be revised to meet the 50 foot setback from the property line to the parking lot Hard surface coverage must average 70 percent over the entire development Individual lots may exceed 70 percent site coverage See table below Lot Lot Area Building area pun Bldg Site coverage Site acres sq ft area Estimate acres Coverage F A R 0 28 sq ft Lot 3 pt 1 7 4 110 000 97 300 5 1 69 2 B 1 Waytek Pt Lot 1 2 2 65 25 300 est 25 300 1 6 60 Bl Lot 1 B 2 3 8 50 000 46 500 2 66 70 BIG SNAP 174 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 11 of 13 Lot Lot Area Building area PUD Bldg Site coverage Site acres sq ft area Estimate acres Coverage F A R 0 28 SQ ft Lot 2 B2 3 32 46 152 40 300 2 65 80 Building 2 Lot 3 B2 2 85 34 800 est 34 800 1 94 68 Lot 4 B2 5 0 49 700 61 400 3 1 62 Minger Lot 5 B2 3 58 48 000 43 700 2 5 70 Outset Outlot C 3 8 0 0 0 0 Total 32 4 363 952 349 300 19 55 60 RECOMMENDA TION Staff f l l lmm lll ls tkat and the Planning Commission recommend that City Council adopt the following motion and adoption of the attached findings of fact and recommendation The Chanhassen Plalllliflg C lmmissi lfl r l l lmm lll ls tkat tk l City Council approves Planning Case 07 27 approving a site plan for a 50 000 square foot one story office warehouse building plans prepared by Houwman Architects dated November 06 2007 subject to the following conditions 1 The building is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system 2 The plans must be prepared and signed by design professionals licensed in the State of Minnesota 3 The plan must be revised to meet the 50 foot setback from the property line on Galpin Boulevard to the parking lot 4 Site lighting shall be revised to incorporate high pressure sodium vapor lamps 5 Architectural lighting shall be down cast only 6 Two upper level windows shall be added on the west end of the south building elevation 7 A column shall be added in the middle of the north building elevation 8 The developer shall provide a pedestrian connection from the site to Lyman Boulevard 9 The proposed sidewalk shall not be located within the existing group of protected trees The sidewalk shall be located either north or south of this area with City approval 10 Pedestrian ramps shall be provided at all curbs for trail and sidewalk connections 175 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 12 of 13 11 All plantings along Galpin Boulevard shall be field located so as to not damage existing trees No trees or shrubs shall be planted within the protected area of trees without City approval 12 All trees shown as preserved on plans dated 09 16 07 shall be protected by tree protection fencing before any construction activities begin Any trees killed or damaged shall be replaced at a rate of 2 1 diameter inches 13 Shrub quantities shall be increased to meet minimum requirements for bufferyard plantings 14 Wood chip mulch shall be used around trees in all landscape peninsulas in place of sod or rocks 15 Applicant must comply with the following Fire Prevention policies a 40 1995 Fire Sprinkler requirements b 07 1991 Pre fire plan drawings c 29 1991 Premises identification d 34 1993 Water service installation e 36 1994 Combination FireIDomestic water service line 16 Applicant must fill out the Combustible Storage and High Pile Combustible Storage form 17 No burning permits shall be issued for trees to be removed Trees and scrubs must either be removed from site or chipped 18 A lO foot clear space must be maintained around fire hydrants 19 The park fees payable with the building permit shall be 42 416 00 20 Sheet Cl shall be amended to show inlet protections on all existing storm sewer inlets 21 Sheet Cl shall be amended to extend the erosion control blanket in the northeast comer of the lot to cover all soil until the proposed grading matches the existing grade 22 Sheet C4 item 2 shall be amended to insert the construction of rain gardens as item 11 in the sequencing of construction activities and inspect site shall be amended so that it is 12 in the sequence 23 Sheet C4 item 5 1 shall have language added to the effect that the SWPPP all amendments and the NPDES permit shall be kept on site in a readily accessible location known to all relevant individuals 24 Sheet Ll the rain gardens shall be designed so that water runoff from the parking area will travel through some form of filter BMP 176 Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 07 27 January 15 2008 Page 13 of 13 25 The rain gardens shall be designed to drain within 48 hours and not be inundated to a depth greater than one foot during a lO year storm event Calculations need to be provided supporting this 26 The applicant shall apply for and obtain permits from the appropriate regulatory agencies and comply with their conditions of approval 27 The complete existing contours must be shown on the east side of the property 28 The proposed contours must tie into the existing contours shown on the plan 29 Retaining walls four feet high or higher require a building permit and must be designed by an engineer registered in the State of Minnesota 30 Eight inch watermain must be looped around the building This watermain shall be privately owned and maintained 31 A cross access agreement must be dedicated and a copy provided to the City before the building permit is issued A TT ACHMENTS 1 Findings of Fact and Recommendation 2 Development Review Application 3 Reduced Copy Site Plan 4 Reduced Copy Main Floor Plan 5 Reduced Copy Building Elevations 6 Reduced Copy Grading Erosion Control Plan 7 Reduced Copy Utility Plan 8 Reduced Copy Landscape Plan 9 Reduced Copy Landscape Details 10 Public Hearing Notice and Mailing List g plan 2007 planning cases 07 27 business impact group snap fitness staff report big snap doc 177 CITY OF CHANHASSEN CARVER AND HENNEPIN COUNTIES MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION INRE Application of Eden Trace Corp for Site Plan Review for a 50 000 square foot one story office warehouse building Planning Case 07 27 On January 15 2008 the Chanhassen Planning Commission met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Eden Trace Corp for a site plan review for the property located at 2411 Galpin Court The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed site plan which was preceded by published and mailed notice The Planning Commission heard testimony from all interested persons wishing to speak and now makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1 The property is currently zoned PUD Planned Unit Development Office Industrial District 2 The property is guided by the Land Use Plan for Office Industrial uses 3 The legal description of the property is Lot 1 Block 2 Chanhassen West Business Park 4 Section 20 110 of the Chanhassen City Code requires the Planning Commission and City Council to evaluate a site plan s compliance with the following a The proposed project is consistent with the elements and objectives of the city s development guides including the comprehensive plan official road mapping and other plans that may be adopted b The proposed project is consistent with the site plan review requirements c The proposed project preserves the site in its natural state to the extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general appearance of the neighboring developed or developing or developing areas d The proposed project creates a harmonious relationship of building and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development 1 178 e The proposed project creates a functional and harmonious design for structures and site features with special attention to the following I An internal sense of order for the buildings and use on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants visitors and general community 2 The amount and location of open space and landscaping 3 Materials textures colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility ofthe same with adjacent and neighboring structures and uses and 4 Vehicular and pedestrian circulation including walkways interior drives and parking in terms oflocation and number of access points to the public streets width of interior drives and access points general interior circulation separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking f The proposed project protects adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provision for surface water drainage sound and sight buffers preservation of views light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses 5 The planning report 07 27 dated January 15 2008 prepared by Robert Generous et aI is incorporated herein RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the site plan for Planning Case 07 27 ADOPTED by the Chanhassen Planning Commission this 15th day of January 2008 CHANHASSEN PLANNING COMMISSION BY Its Chairman 2 179 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard P O Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 952 227 1100 Planning Case No 01 d L c rfv OF CHANHASSEN RECEIVED I DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPL ICATION OCT 2 0 2007 PLEASE PRINT CHANHASSEN PLANNING DEPT Applicant Name and Address Owner Name and Address EDEN 1RA C ep t 1 6 S r u Grov 51 4 1 t htu s A Sb MAU OR I CouA CW r ij A E N JIW 5 3 Contact MA RK UtJDE S A D Contact e tA Phone qsz Jizz Fax CfS 2 3b bl Z 3 Phone qsz ltlc f U Fax 2 f 7 f tf Email Mo r Ie e e de ri te CD J I Email NOTE Consultation with City staff is required prior to submittal including review of development plans Comprehensive Plan Amendment Temporary Sales Permit Conditional Use Permit CUP Vacation of Right of Way Easements VAC Interim Use Permit IUP Variance V AR Non conforming Use Permit Wetland Alteration Permit WAP Planned Unit Development Zoning Appeal Rezoning Zoning Ordinance Amendment Sign Permits Sign Plan Revie w Notification Sign 200 City to install and remove x Site Plan Review SPR Soot SO 000 Escrow f JiJlr1g Fees Attorney Cost 50 CU ACNAR WAP Metes Bounds 450 Minor SUBce deV Ct C e Co P TOTAL FEE I O IL C rz Subdivision An additional fee of 3 00 per address within the public hearing notification area will be invoiced to the applicant prior to the public hearing Sixteen 16 full size folded copies of the plans must be submitted including an 8 X 11 reduced copy for each plari sheet along with a di ital copy in TIFF Group 4 tif format Escrow will be required for other applications through the development contract Building material samples must be submitted with site plan reviews NOTE When multiple applications are processed the appropriate fee shall be charged for each application SCANNED 180 PROJECT NAME Bu SINt SS fA cr G O tp SNAP LOCATION 411 6MRltl Ccu t r tnJ8SS LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 01 l BloCK 1 C AfJ S E N N es r BtA S AlesS t 95 dd 4 0ot lO TOTAL ACREAGE WETLANDS PRESENT YES X NO PRESENT ZONING f U J REQUESTED ZONING f PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATION r O p REQUESTED LAND USE DESIGNATION REASON FOR REQUEST 50 000 sF o fQ V I re J o se b J I This application must be completed in full and be typewritten or clearly printed and must be accompanied by all information and plans required by applicable City Ordinance provisions Before filing this application you should confer with the Planning Department to determine the specific ordinance and procedural requirements applicable to your application A determination of completeness of the application shall be made within 15 business days of application submittal A written notice of application deficiencies shall be mailed to the applicant within 15 business days of application This is to certify that I am making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request This application should be processed in my name and I am the party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application I have attached a copy of proof of ownership either copy of Owner s Duplicate Certificate of Title Abstract of Title or purchase agreement or I am the authorized person to make this application and the fee owner has also signed this application I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application I further understand that additional fees may be charged for consulting fees feasibility studies etc with an estimate prior to any authorization to proceed with the study The documents and information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge 6t GN CO ignature of Applicant ll I 07 Date i c cI B b Date Signature of Fee Owner G pLAtflformsmevelopment Review Application DOC Rev 12 05 181 Proposed Office Warehouse Chanhassen West Business Park Addition l 111 t Imp lbtal t ffrct B ldf A e lC ornct IIuUIIC 1IIUC1lOar s MCMIq t CCJOIIlI kOCll a cu stOe IlOOf SlUL 1 11 SOL IlOOf ll 1llI 0I1111 11 Of l AliIi II GnOl NOJlCf MfI 10 Cl AC I c all T c a lIVIIllllMlllOC 1I 1IC c oca tlCOOIUC lIC IlIKJI PAM I I IIIi oo I Il tIC tGlnuc 10 0t00C 10M NJD 0I1Uo CNP AIOIO lO 1IIOo oCoIl1O 1IC 11OI or tIC MlCMlIlCI ILUlQ fOll III A2 I A i1iii e eJ not r 1 L ftMNLC PRCl eC verQU Site Pion 10 IItt lU UI U CMOo 1P a u to IIDIAG IU IUlG 1 n U c lJ CUGI PRO EC T o rTAA NQP h uc no APMAlI w uc acr r lID If 10 lOl I lI IICWJIhUC JIf1 1AS rlO PARICI IC RJ OIJ1M WrNf UllJIIO u IlIIOS oIC lIKlUS1Ul U arncc 11000 SlALLS n Lt sf I SI lll Lf O U 0I11CNlllo OGlI taus 0 1 000 M I I 10 ttllAU S IOlIlL CUllQMI AU 1 TOTAL PARKINC PROYlDEO 111 STAllS Of cH I S R QUlRED TO BE H C AC SS8 E STAUS I ARE SHOWN @ SIGN DETAL Southeast Corner Perspective ii 1 I I I 0 L I I 1 11lOOf 1 10 C d r 1lWllC r I LYMAN BLVl5 e iIII toICJ @ crNrRA Norrs I 11 CMl IllIA cs CllAOloO III1U1 CS a XI 111 toloTMl IUlU G AI l D lQ S J o n llMCulClAU 1 ii DnlClll P ICiIlGIIlMGOlIAWIC S IOlACl lO MC o lt O 1OIAQ U 1I1C ICM Il fVoIl ey m N11i U1 lJUllrrlSllrelS Nt fIIl dllull I IS o IIJ 1b illtUHUOU U W6Jll 117Jti E t lL hUll nlolluull n H n II I lMIIoft01l rn lIlf IIl l IIl IN II lil Tl tl lII llIlY 1UUl m lNOlnllt url Il HllLII 1 ll l1 EDEN TRACE CORPORATIO t1ISliU U OR cnlRT QW f SSc WoI553IT lfl JJ36I oi 12 F XIOr 2I 1fiI072 1 f RtJJEL1 ux nl lt I G I 1 L BL D LUL N BlVD OL Mt X N L lot I a t 2 lltllWINGO Nrn Snap Fitness 2025 1 DMi Suiif 200 Ot fl llAS il JIi U l55317 Business hllpact Group lM7bOl4 l rt BlSt UL 1L S iCN r f r 117 REVISED SITE PU N SUBMmAL SET I1 f I l T PREL IL l ARY ONLY NOT FOR COXSmUCflON JOOI 0 TE H WN QIECKfO utl9 07 HI SrrEPLlJI A1 0 182 @ I OR PLAN i ll unli dSWC Usw NrwBrill II nU 5 i11J ll 1l 6 11 J l Cli JhJ9 9n6 F L I l lLol hwwln ntlm IJ Jlll l ln TlI 05 n lIO I I l lfi n t1t nJ 5 T ll l lL ll EDEN TRACE CORPORATION 8156 M U lllW nllm UL NIL SSL j U l 17 U521 Jlo1 V H fMlfl521l6J T J RnIHT l0CA1Ul GAl P IIHl D l1 I lRI D H NtL SSl N Mr lOlI BIocJ 1 lll lUlI GO t l Il i Snap Filness 20lS CMer Bl d SUiltl 2UO Qi H N lINSSJI7 Business Impad Group 187UOL I rtw 1Oast aL lIl EN MN 117 REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTAl SET 1 lC l I It l llIrrsn Il11 fUt IMTV l CT PRELIMINARY ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JOllI D TE lv WN OI CKfO hh R OORPL N A2 0 183 Dil Il I z I I H 0 cwo l U t M iH u 5ij I 1 1 So o 5g i1lC l 0 6 Z f a g x B b O C 1G a cw o t i w lilt i Q 2 1 z e fil8 iQ u i o iO 0 i z BH I 08 s E all H H JO f1 H l ii l i i i i I q H H ii 1 l 1l ii JJ t 1 3 3 I 3 i 3 z o 1Ij j 1 I tlJ i H u I I t I a 5 i i I i f r 1111 I 01 I I I i II III ill i I J I I II I u h J J II i 1 lIi i i a 1I1 lilll 5 II J fll lltlll 110It J JJJ 11 i h li lilll lr lr lr II i H II II inn t Jt t JtiJWtiJtiJ J J Jt J JtiJ I I I I i I f ii I I I I i I II i II Sa I la lt i I Ituls 1 II IiHU I i ffi t BUUl lU lr I I lIlJhll I q J I Q If I t I 11111 n n II 3 3 El 3 El 3 3 tiJ tiJ Jt 184 GRAllING NOTES 1 CON TRAC SHAil CONTACT COPH R ST t ON CALl AT LEAST t HOURS PRIOR TO lCCA VATlOH CONSTRUCTtOtt nlR EXIST1NQ UNOERGROUND lfflIJTY LOCATlI IIlS 1WItt effiES IURO AAEA fl I 4 OOO2 OR TOLL FllEE 1 800 2 2 116fl 2 CONTRACtOR SHAlL F1ELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ElEVAnoNS OF EXIST1NC UTILJrC AND TOPOCfW H1C F AT lR S Pf IOR TO START Of SITE CIlAOINC THE CONTRACTOR SHAll IWlotEDlATELY NOTIfY lli PROJECT EER Of 1Hr DISCRfPANCIES OR V TlONS 3 surrABLE GRADING TrRIAL SHAll COtfSIST OF AU SOlI O COUKrrRED ON SIT wmt THE EXCEFfJON fJT TOPSOIl DEBRIS ORGANIC TfRW AND NIt OTHER lMSTAlllE w TtR 4 SUflCRAO EXCAV I T1OH SfW L lE 8oIoCKF1t UD WOl AffiYN TER EXCAVATION TO I flP 0fF SET Nff STAflIL JlY PROBL t lS DUE TO WATER SHPAC OR SlUP SLOPES WfI 1OI ACING NEW SU UC t C w Tt Rw oI D W f N1 TO EXISTING P OlT THE XCAVATlOtt SHALL BE BACKfllLro PROIM TI Y TO AVOID UN RI lININD 1l1E EXtSl1NC PAvn lEN T 5 CONTRACTOR SHAlL BE RESPONStSlE roA u HORIZONTAL AND UlTICAl COHTI Ol 6 ALl X s mnAL lNClJ IOINC BIT MNOUS Sl RF AClNG C NC A8ANOOH l UTIlITY 1TEW5 NolO IoNf OT iER Uli JSA8l E TtRw 5 SAAl Il COloIE THE PRQPERTY OfF THE CONl RACTOR AND SHAll IE DISPOSEO on fH CONSTRUCTION 5fTE 7 COlM tETlON OF SIT CIllDINC OPERATlONS SHALL RE SUlT ALL AREAS BEINe CIWlED TO PLAH SUeGAADE ElLV TlON THE rOUNOATlOH N BVlLOlNG PAD DIUENSIONS SHAlL BE OCTERllllt lED BY REfERRING TO THE ARCHITECTURAl AND OR mUCTUAAl OAAWlNOS THE HORjlON lAl D1I 1ENSlONS AHD lOCATION Of THE PARI ING LOT AND ORMWAY AREAS SHAll BE DETERMINED BY REfERRING TO THE SITE PlAN f IE P U IENT SECTION AHD SUB8ol SE SIW l BE COORDlNol TED wml TWE G OTECHNICAl REPOIU 8 FlNISHED GROUND AOJACOlT TO PRoposrn BUIl DIMGS Sl W l lIE SlOPED WAY AT A MINIMIJIol OF tI INCHES IN 10 FnT 5 OX fOR f I f1RST 10 f EIT EXCEPT R NOlID ON PlAN BEYOND 10 f U REfER TO Pl AH GRol DES CONTRACT IS RESPOWSI8LE fUR CAADlNG THE flNfSHED GROUND SUR ACE AHO CONSTRUCTlNC PROPOSED PA UIENTS Sl WAU s Nro CURB II CUTTER wml SloIOOf I II UNifORM SlOPES TO PlKMDE POSrrNt OIWNool CE AWAY FROM BUIlOINCS AND PREVENT PONDlNG IN lOWER AREAS CONTACT ENGINEER F F1ElD ADJUSTlolENiS TOCRAOiNG SAR REOUIREO 10 lHSTAll A IolIffiMIJIol Of 4 INCHES OF CLASS 5 ACGREGol 1T B4SE UtttR All PROPOS CUftB AND ClJfTER 11 RUtR TO STORWATER POlumON PREVrh TlON PlAN SWPPP f OR OETALS ON EROSION II srnllENi CO IlTROl PRACTICES t lCLUO MG INSTAUATION AND WAlNTDUHCf PROCrnURE EROSION COtmlOl StW 1 BE 116TAUn NolO NSPf CT tI PRIOl TO foJf SITE GfW lHC 2 COM RACTOR Sl W l NanN THE CITl A lollNlMut I OF 48 HOUflS PRIOR TO WORKING wmllN f IE RIGHT OF WAY AND O T RlIlIN F CITY INSPECllON WIU BE REQUIRro 13 RETAINING WAllS OYER fOUR fUT HIGH MUST BE DESIGNED BY A PROfESSIONAl ENGINEER AND A PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTlOH LEGEllD PROPUlT l UN EASEU WT UN TIP OUT CURB UN 1 4 s SAHlT RY st wrR WI MANtia L I 1 1 WATER MAIN wI nR HYlJfIAJ tTIIAUX VAlVE CAT VAlW 44 41 4 c CA W 4 t l Rn pSEcnOH MAJOR CONTQlJR LINE l 1 1INOR CONTOVR UN l G Of mns PrRC OIT CRAOE blI AlHAGt SLOP W RGENCY OVERFlOW DRAINAGE RETAINING WAll nPE 1 EROSICl t CONTROL SILT rENt TWE 2 EllOSlOH CONTRCl SILT f ENC INLET PROTECTICl t J J 0 0ooooo I J c J IffimllmillI l ll1U c J J STAHt ARD DUN PAVEMENT HEAVY OUN PAVEUENT CONCRETt PA wnlENT c J ROCK CONSmuCTION ENTRANt EllOSlCJ CONlRQ fll lNKn GUTlER PAVEloI NT E1 EV 12 t r e rttT 4r o BIT JtolINQUS DC I I I II I I I h S o 961 AA Jl6l EXISTINC COtolTOlJltS c ow9lNATlON OF Sl lRVE I ED TOPOGRAPHY DESlCM CONr0UR9 FOR iF o N D C c 0 I8t J8 O Bt JJ Chec bdBy H r CHANHA ST LOT 1 I r 15 07 I GRADING EROSION CONTROL PLAN I rC 1 I Ml III ber I2Mt 1 1IrtIfW1hIl IIr I L IIf IIf K u 0 1t tL 1Pt lliOlIOnt 1G IlW 1 Schoell Madson 9 EDEN TRACE CORP IU a lofyC CMnhu MN 15305 10 712 185 lIT1lJTY CONSTRUC11QH Ham I COtmlACTOA SHAll CONTACT CoPHOl STATE ON CJrU AT LEAST 48 HOURS PR TO XCAV I TlOH CONsmucnoN EXISTING UNOERGROUHD unUTY lOCilTlOHS TlI 1N cmES III lllO NfEA 6 1 4 OOO2 OR Tou fREE 1 800 252 1161 1 2 PRIOR TO CONS1RI ICT1ON tl1 CONlAACTOR SfW l nno VUllf Y AU XlS11NG UT1UTY l CJ TlONS AND SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN IH SCRU ANCY 8ElWUH PUHS 40 f1ElD COM llTIONS StW L BE RE PORitD TO TH PROJ CT HCINITR IWt lEDlAfELY 3 THE CONfRACTOR SHAll IJERtfY THE LOCATIONS 0 n VATlOffS OF lHE BUl D HG PIPE SYSTnl PRIOR TO COHSTlWCTINC SEIlVICE CONHE C OON 4 Al L lJT VT T WORK SHAU BE P ArQflW O IN ACCOROANCt WITH em SPtclflCATlOl fS ANO 8UIlO1HG PERwrr REQUIREWENTS lO SHAlL COOROl l Il QRl Ilmt AlL lJTlJfY COWPANI S 5 WAT Rr wN SHAU BE C 9OO PVC CO ffQRlIfHQ TO THE RE twOltS OF ANSI A A 1 Al1 51 ANI Cl04 AlU FlTTlHGS SHAlL BE cuss 2 CONfORUlNQ TO THE REQU1REWE Of olHSl AwttA CIIO 2I IO OR AWWA Cl53 All Sl HYDFWrT5 SHAU BE THE PACER AS t lANUfACTURED 8T WATI ROUS co OR CfTY APPROVUl EOt L CATE VAlVES SfW l BE 1 1 1 DISC TVPE WITH RESlUE HT 5f AT wrEnNC THE R Qt IROiEN TS Of A C509 AU PlUGS TEES BENDS O OTHER THRUST POIKTS sw u BE PROVIDEO WITH CONCRrTE R AC T1ON BACkING OR WECA LUG AU WAITRlolAIM SIW L BE INSTAll1 D Wmt A WIN1WUW 0 7 S AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AW A ClIOO AND COHOUCTM1Y PlW 1Sl0N CONFORMING TO ANSI AWWA C11I AlI 1I BEfORE BEWC PUCro IN SUMCE THE COIM LETED WATERt IAlN SI ALl BE OONF ECTED AND Fl USI IED IN ACCOfm lHC WfTW IoWWA C I AND THE REQUIR l lomi or THE IoltNNESOTIo OEP OF HEAlTH 6 s t NlTAR I SEWER SKo U BE PVC SDR 26 UNLESS HOTrD 01HERWlSE SANITAA Y 1iOLES SHALL BE 45 Dw IETt R PRECAST RElNFDRCED CONCREll IN ACCORON E WITH ASTlrl C47S CASTlNG SI ALl BE NEENNt 1 42 wrTH M f COVER Mo HHOL S SHIolL WoVE A IoIINlMUW OF TWO AND A WAXlt lUt l or r AO JUST lENTRlNcs 7 STORIol SEWER SI Wl BE DlW WAU HOPE PIPE OR APf RO IEO EOUAl STORIol IMNHOlLS SHALl EtE 45 Dw trnR PRtC ST RrINrQRCro CONCRUt NIO CASTlttG SIW L BE NEENAl R 17JJ CATCH 9ASIHS SflAU BE PREC ST RrINrORCEO CONCRETE AND CASTING sw u at NEOWi R 32 B OR APPROVED OVAl rOR CATCH BASINS I CURB UNE AND NEEHAH R 1733 WITH Co RATt OR APPftOVED EOUAL f Ofl B SlNS IN THE 1ol100LE OF PAVED AREAS IoU STORW STRUCTURES stWJ BE IN IoCCORONlCE WITH ASTU C47S AND VE A NlIolUW OF 2 AND A IIWIWIol or 4 A JUSTIol NT RlNoliS B AU PIPE CONHECTlONS TO EXlS1lNC IJTUtY STRUCJ IRB SIW L BE ll Qft N SEAl OR CITY N PflOVEO EOUAL rOIl COtfCRETE BlOCK OR 9RICI STRlJC TUflES CONSlRI ICT AN OPENrNC EDUAl TO THE PIPE SIZE CROUT NlOUMO PIPE TO ClOS Of f NING AHO REPAIR SllM l1JRE TO CITY REQUIRo lENT5 THE CONTRACTOR SHAU RIfY THe TYPE OF COJlNECTlON WITH CITY Et 1NfIRIl tG DEPARTIolENT AND COORt INATt JNf NSPEClKlNS NEEDED rOR CfTY ACCEPTNtCE 0 COtmRACTOR SIW L nno ADJUST AU CASTlNG 10 IllATCH FINAl CIWlES 10 CO WIll BE RESPONSIIll OBTAlNlttG THE APPROPRlATt SEWER WArm AND PLUt lBINO PERlolrrs AQIot THE CITY S 8I M DING DfPARTWENT 11 UTl l TY TRtNCHES SIW BE CQt lPAClUl TO l lIIi STANOAAO PROCTOR WAXn II IW DRY OCNSITY ASTIot 0 98 711 OR MSHlO T 99 fROW THE PII E ZONE TO WITHIN THREE rtrT Of THE GROUND SURr t AND 100llli STANDAAO PROCTOR IN THE UPPOl lHR tEET 12 CO OR SHAI l NOl1FY THE CITY A IolINIWUM or 43 HOI JftS PRIOII TO WORKING WITHIN THE R1GHT or WAY CITY INSPf CT1ON lMY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRIJCTK N or l1T1IJTY SERVICES TO EXIS1lNC l1TllITY WJNS 13 THE CONTRACTOR IAJST CAll THE CITY TO INSPECT THE CONNECTION TO THE SANITAA Y SEWER LEGEHll JllQ QSDL lIllO PROPERTYUNE ASOl NT LINE TIP OUT CURB UN 1 SANITARY SEWER wI WANHOlE l WATtR AlN w nRE HYDRANT II AUIt VAl o E GAlt VAl o E O IC CATOi BASIN STORW 11 SCYl R I IANHOlE cti Fl ARED END SECllON wI R1PRAP RETAlNINC WAU c J U U i i1 4 c J wIR ion o toI Onel j lr I l U L LU L e rm ft r 1 L i I I I I VD WARN THE comRACTOR SHALl CONTACT 1oll PV8UC lInLmES s z N Ot G o I Y tI I L ff t o 1t 1 I btI nIL 8r o loi isr J D Br JJ H EDEN TRACE CORP Itst dolyC CMRtI IfM S53llS tIJ2 Hl412 l1 I CHANHASSEN WEST LOT 1 110 507 CHAtlM UlI Il I I UTILITY PLAN SIIlI ProJ GI NumHr I2Ml 1 TJV l4f fl G lll O ClIIdIIIW 1 nal Schoell Madson I IImIng Enol v 186 i L i i e i a a rDi 3 t a i i t i i g g o e 8 i s 0 0 f g I i h i u i i e 3 l5 l5 g 8 i d5 B 3 t o o Hi g i i p g i i d s i i e 0 ii 8 9 13 h d i i i i m i t i s I i i g 8 g o H h n n ii d qi Bi z l5 l5 I 8f u 3 8 B g i g g u I g oe i i il e il igi g I i i II i i Ii f 8 Ii i i i 2 i i o n S i 0 i i i t i ii i i 3 g n i i h i a iH n i u n I d Ii i h I i @ u n i i ii i ili i i iii u i i gi g I g i I I i il ii Ii II i Ii III iU I h f a 8 eJ t ih DO I I i Op J I i Oo i t i g i3 gg 3 iI H Ro J S oe In g i H W Vi H I il i q U H i t I n J g r g q p h i 21 I h H i g il u 8 z a i3 0 q l i i i i i N N i a H n UiH i ii I zc f 5 Zcr j o c f l zog f i5 c i i g3iu J i i I i 0 t I H 3i g d j iii j i i l5 8 I u I TI Ii 0 0 J I I l e z Ii 5 zi 0 z 5 0 X U J a e l U ii a w c w P Iii I I Hi IIi t J f i lil Ill f O l c f 1 i J I 187 RAIN GARDEN NOTES I S I ANOSCN FVHNolOOETAIl Sl arsF OR PI HT1NCSN CD4ElUrl PUHTING lNSTAU J noH 2 PRCMOE AND INSTAlL EROSION CONTROL BlJ NK f AT RAIN Am GAAOEM AArA S1DESlOPES BlANKET TO BE ONE SfASOt I EOGUTr WNOOT CATE GORY 2 W IS WOOD tlBfR 15 OR APPll C1vfil QlW B1 ANK T TO Il 0VERlN P I BY 4 AND ANCHOR BY SOO SlAPlf5 PI J C Ilt NII ET PERPENDlCUI AR TO THE SLOPE TRENCH 1M EDCES Of Bl ANI Ef AREA TO PREVENT UNDER WINING PRCMOE SilT rENCE AT TOP Of SlOP oS HEEDED 3 5HR OO D HAAOWOOD WUlCH TO T04 OrnER PROJECT Pt lTING t IIJlCH PLACE DEPlH Of MULCH AT AU P ANTI oIO ANtI EROSION C OL 9lJ NI ET ARtNNO FUER FABRIC 4 SOllPffOflLEOfTH ItAINWA GARDENASINOlCAT DONDETM DRAlH11lE TO BE AT BOTTQlr I Of PROflL AND CONNECTED TO STORW SEWER SYSTEM COt lPACllOH AND OR SOil ROSKlN IN Tl Il AlN GAROEH SOIL PROfl E IS NOT AllOWED REMOVE AND REPlACE AS NtED TO PI NIOE PROPER INf1LTRAllOtt ANtI ORAlNotGE R OUIREWENTS PER ENGINEERS N PROV L S INSTAll IN ACc tJRD NC WITH CITY WATrRSHrn ANO Oft lCU R QUIFtELlENTS I PROVIOE A 2 YVoA WARRANTEE roR PlANT MAlIRW UPON PROJf CT SUBST 4HTw C0IotPlE110N RAIN GARDEN PLANT LIST COllE OTY CQt lIolON NAM MTlN NAME OZE ROOT REl 4ARK SAU OW SE DGE ua SEEDUNG Pl AHT 1 D C Cor lunda A wmM ua PI ANT 1 D C Iri v lcolor BROWN MD SUSAoN SEEDlING J 5Pr Rudbe klo bl OtIO we 100 BUTTERnYWIIJ WEED ua SEEDlING PI AHT 11 D C cIeI IOIltube SlOESlOPE GOLDEN ALDWtOERS SttDUNQ PI AHT 111 O CO li SlUE SlOPE REO CARDINAL fLOWER StEOlINC PI AHT 18 D C lob c rd nlln Be BLACK CHOKEBERRY 12 CONT PI AHT 5 0 D C AIon ca llI IOC l lI IT e o sE I SIOESlOPE OUANTnlES SHOWN IN THE Pl NmttG SCHUlUU ARE fOfl lliE CONlfW lOffS CO E NCE COHTIlACTOR TO VERIFY OI WmTIES SHOWN OM THE PI AN 4J BrS B RAIN GARDEN ENLARGEMENT SOUTH OF PARKING LOT 7 mmr B II i T 5 ItL l f CONiAIN R STOCK 1 SCARlFYSIlDNCl8OT OUrEIO L l Pl lOCfiD wmt COR E f Rl INHC AS DIREctED rrr EMClNtElt OO I j Il ANJ SCQllE 0fI PM JN q OF SOlI w ss rn ItEDll CtCIIICtJNC f 8lIlCIU 4 SET fIl NiT OH UI OSTI RllEO SOIl Oft TWl lIlOOQt YCOW ACTttl tw kFU ATlH 5N11EDEFn4 Pfl OP Il ASIfWAS TliEJ IRSERY IS I Ft YWAlUlTOWTU PI ANl 5ANDfl 1 tl lS CONSTlII ICT3MOEJOn4 TtRNG I TUI Y IIfTll 2 7 PlACEWIA C Ilffi1IN HOURSrETHE5 COI lD lERJ tOlH E5SSOI WOISTUl IS XCBSIIIL U SnRUB CONT PLANTING DETAIL T r rnEI co t R W co 1 7 c I WIW ST lrRTATIIOTTOlol Ii Y D IlINC WI 40 DD TM lIU CH I VoNTINOSOl IIoIIN I ItLN I 3OFROOTBAU lD I I All lWINE AND W RE hI NOTE UNllISTl R8EDSOI OftCOl l ACmI W I fll STmP0ST5lOllENl1TCHroOlllOllll LrDTORttNMcuYWlIlt S PI ACE C T1 OUTSI OFIIOOT otLOM M PlUlol8IlfGARDLfSSOFCIlOUND lOf E 1l QU S1STOSUBST11VT RIJBIIEIl HOSE AND WIRE W lNQ S l iTDISWlL1 NOTBEAF f lllM D o AS APPlICMU y IlIOlA l NO J EXTO J IlO CAVAT1OfrlANDIIoOOCFUSOI rnAl OM llOWI I ll lf f QUI TOOftlowtlt n rw 11ON TOWl THE 8OTTOW OF THE HOU C1I Y 9f1lfAlll 1 f lN If 10 II6lM DIOUATE DIWIlAC tOWSOllS CfW lIUI NIISOI WUS ll oIIOOIDM8ACllflU ARE A5OfPOOll o PLANTING DETAIL FOR STEEP SLOPES TS AVE AUOVNT or WATER PER UCATlO GAl 2 TRE S CAUPER 50 100 at BAR ROOT TREES A BURlN Pro CONTAINER SHRUBS WOOtn SffDU HlR9ACEOUS VINES 1 nlE WArrRlNG GUIOEUNE S ASStJWE A SOIl CONDITION Willi AO QUATE BUT NOT EXctssM It POOR RAI1 UlCE WATERING INTERVAlS AND UNT Of APPUCAllON MUST BE VAI lI D CONSIDERING PREVAILING SOlI lolQlST JRt AND WEATHf R CONOIllONS THROUGHOUT niE GROWINC SfASOM AOEO TE BUT NOT EXCESSIVE SOIl lol lSTUR IN THE ROOT lONE Of NEW PlAHTlNG MUST aE UAlNTAIN O AT u TIIoIES THROUGHOUT mE CROWING SEASON FOfI THE FIRST TWO YEARS FOllOWING Pl NmNG WATERINC loIA Y BE REQUIRED WEEKLY OR INm QUENTLY THIS tlET RloIlNATIOH SHALl BE loIA O BY niE CONTRACTOR JtlN OfPL AHTlNGHOl NOTE STAMfoKlCl 1 1 NQI5NOT mc PAtm TS om f CltYlNO 1II lflS Of ItOO I 5YSTE l DUERIoIHED 8T THE DIQI EElt TIlE I llU I IN lsmtw WITIl MST O POST TRU SlAKINC Gl MNGl 1l T fi M I IEl 3 TREE PLANTING STAKING GUYING DETAIL C WATERING GUIDELINES 959 4J Brs 4t1 49 BF C SCALE IO 0 1y Schoel Madson E S 1 trrr lIr I L J I o ChecIledBr D Iy 2 THE CONTRACTtl l IS ADVISED THAT THE WATERING CUlDEUHfS AAE NOT REOUrROlENTS OF THE CONTRACT AlTl lOU FAIlURE TO CORREct WATER DEFlCITS BY SuPPlEIoIOilAl WATERIN It fAIlURE TO COIolPfNSAT fOfl tXCESSIVE SOIL WQI TUR E AND OfI AJNAGE F ROBl EWS IllAY RESULT IN UNACCEPTA8Ll PLANTS lE AOIttG TO REOUCED 011 NO PAYIol NT WASH llEOJUTE 0l0SI0M COIrnlOl r WN OOf 3M lYPt 2 ON S SLOPES Of 1 1 DR CIlEATEIl ANCJo c rABlllC WITIl SOD STAPUS PlIlOVIOE OYDll o IP lRDlQlOlGD rllBRlCtO COVEJIwmt4 IIEPTMSHIl EDll J t olIlDWOOO lU tI S 70l1 SMa 5l f ASSINC TIlE 200 NCl A lNOFSO IPASSlNC M 40SIEVL 3OlI ORGoloNlC PElT woss H IPMIIiI Oft SPHNHJU FPRCMOE SflMl T IIMIN AT Ill INlETS W 1H IlIP fW VEM Y 8o SIN SlZE 3 XS U DEEP 1M AND M P II PVH AND OR wml WAmt IWlllEN lU I OIlY wmtN 24 lOUR PEIllOO lINtESSDESlCNEDOTHEJr IISE 3 COHTRN 10f1 lU PIlCMX IWIrl rot tfFl 1Il AT1Ofrl It51ING CCWl Fl TDtACCRECATE WnDOT314UH r CH MQfITE 1 f IIIIOIII1Q IlUo T1ON Cl D1fJlTUr 8fllC T I PI I OOTJ7J3 12 0IA wrM O JERf1 OW STOR SEWER WHHOlE 011 CATCM BASIN NEENAH R 25111 BEEHIVE CASTING A F1W IE I l I J DRAINTlLEI OVERFLOW DfWN11l CDNNHT Tn I 10 S W A Oft Iol YUGHT o RAIN GARDEN ENLARGE IENT 11IlllO NDIII IlllI oallW 1 1 r I CHANHA ST LOT 1 r r4k I F I i LANDSCAPE DETAILS 11I1 0 GM1 u EDEN TRACE CORP 11J1 Ccut eNol III S530S 112 1 872 1 188 CITY OF CHANHASSEN AFFIDA VIT OF MAILING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA ss COUNTY OF CARVER I Karen J Engelhardt being first duly sworn on oath deposes that she is and was on January 3 2008 the duly qualified and acting Deputy Clerk of the City of Chanhassen Minnesota that on said date she caused to be mailed a copy of the attached notice of Public Hearing for Business Impact Group Snap Fitness Planning Case 2007 27 to the persons named on attached Exhibit A by enclosing a copy of said notice in an envelope addressed to such owner and depositing the envelopes addressed to all such owners in the United States mail with postage fully prepaid thereon that the names and addresses of such owners were those appearing as such by the records of the County Treasurer Carver County Minnesota and by other appropriate records Subscribed and sworn to before me this3zL day of l UlY 2008 189 Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date Time Tuesday January 15 2008 at 7 00 p m This hearing may not start until later in the evenin de endin on the order of the a enda Location Cit Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd Request for Site Plan Review for a 50 000 square foot Proposal office warehouse building on property zoned Planned Unit Develo ment PUD located at A Iicant Eden Trace Cor oration Property 2411 Galpin Court Location Lot 1 Block 2 Chanhassen West Business Park A location ma is on the reverse side of this notice The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant s request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project During the meeting the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps at the Meeting 1 Staff will give an overview of the proposed project 2 The applicant will present plans on the project 3 Comments are received from the public 4 Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the ro ect If you want to see the plans before the meeting please visit the City s projects web page at www cLchanhassen mn us serv plan 07 27 html If you wish to talk to someone about this project please contact Robert Questions Generous by email at bqenerous@cLchanhassen mn us or by Comments phone at 952 227 1131 If you choose to submit written comments it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting Staff will provide copies to the Commission The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday rior to the Plannin Commission meetin City Review Procedure Subdivisions Planned Unit Developments Site Plan Reviews Conditional and Interim Uses Wetland Alterations Rezonings Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting Staff prepares a report on the subject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation The item will be opened for the pUblic to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process The Commission will close the pUblic hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council The City Council may reverse affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission s recommendation Rezonings land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial Minnesota State Statute 519 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting A neighborhood spokesperson representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person s Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council If you wish to have somethin to be included in the re ort lease contact the Plannin Staff erson named on the notification Notice of Public Hearing Chanhassen Planning Commission Meeting Date Time Tuesday January 15 2008 at 7 00 p m This hearing may not start until later in the evenin de endin on the order of the a enda Location Cit Hall Council Chambers 7700 Market Blvd Request for Site Plan Review for a 50 000 square foot Proposal office warehouse building on property zoned Planned Unit Develo ment PUD located at A Iicant Eden Trace Cor oration Property 2411 Galpin Court Location Lot 1 Block 2 Chanhassen West Business Park A location ma is on the reverse side of this notice The purpose of this public hearing is to inform you about the applicant s request and to obtain input from the neighborhood about this project During the meeting the Chair will lead the What Happens public hearing through the following steps at the Meeting 1 Staff will give an overview of the proposed project 2 The applicant will present plans on the project 3 Comments are received from the public 4 Public hearing is closed and the Commission discusses the ro ect If you want to see the plans before the meeting please visit the City s projects web page at www cLchanhassen mn us serv plan 07 27 html If you wish to talk to someone about this project please contact Robert Questions Generous by email at bqenerous@cLchanhassen mn us or by Comments phone at 952 227 1131 If you choose to submit written comments it is helpful to have one copy to the department in advance of the meeting Staff will provide copies to the Commission The staff report for this item will be available online on the project web site listed above the Thursday rior to the Plannin Commission meetin City Review Procedure Subdivisions Planned Unit Developments Site Plan Reviews Conditional and Interim Uses Wetland Alterations Rezonings Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Code Amendments require a public hearing before the Planning Commission City ordinances require all property within 500 feet of the subject site to be notified of the application in writing Any interested party is invited to attend the meeting Staff prepares a report on the SUbject application that includes all pertinent information and a recommendation These reports are available by request At the Planning Commission meeting staff will give a verbal overview of the report and a recommendation The item will be opened for the public to speak about the proposal as a part of the hearing process The Commission will close the public hearing and discuss the item and make a recommendation to the City Council The City Council may reverse affirm or modify wholly or partly the Planning Commission s recommendation Rezonings land use and code amendments take a simple majority vote of the City Council except rezonings and land use amendments from residential to commerciallindustrial Minnesota State Statute 519 99 requires all applications to be processed within 60 days unless the applicant waives this standard Some applications due to their complexity may take several months to complete Any person wishing to follow an item through the process should check with the Planning Department regarding its status and scheduling for the City Council meeting A neighborhood spokesperson representative is encouraged to provide a contact for the city Often developers are encouraged to meet with the neighborhood regarding their proposal Staff is also available to review the project with any interested person s Because the Planning Commission holds the public hearing the City Council does not Minutes are taken and any correspondence regarding the application will be included in the report to the City Council If you wish to have somethin to be included in the re ort lease contact the Plannin Staff erson named on the notification 190 Lyman Blvd C R 18 Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a sUlVey and is not intended to be used as one This map is a compilation of records infonmation and data located in various city county state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown and is to be used for reference purposes only The City does not warrant that the Geographic Infonmation System GIS Data used to prepare this map are error Iree and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952 227 1107 The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Sfatufes 9466 03 Subd 21 2000 and the user of this map acknowledges that the City shall not be liable lor any damages and expressly waives all claims and agrees to defend indemnify and hold harmless the City Irom any and all claims brought by User its employees or agents or third parties which arise out 01 the use s access or use of data provided Lyman Blvd CR 18 Disclaimer This map is neither a legally recorded map nor a sUlVey and is not intended to be used as one This map is a compilation of records information and dafa locafed in various city county state and federal offices and other sources regarding the area shown and is to be used for reference purposes only The City does not warrant that the Geographic Information System GIS Dafa used to prepare this map are error Iree and the City does not represent that the GIS Data can be used for navigational tracking or any other purpose requiring exacting measurement of distance or direction or precision in the depiction of geographic features If errors or discrepancies are found please contact 952 227 1107 The preceding disclaimer is provided pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 9466 03 Subd 21 2000 and the user of this map aCknowledges that the City shall not be liable for any damages and expressly waives all claims and agrees to defend indemnify and hold harmless the City Irom any and all claims brought by User its employees or agents or third parties which arise out of the user s access or use of data provided 191 DAVID G YAEL M RUBIN 2345 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7413 MARK ALLEN SUNDQUIST 2374 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403 RODDY Y LAURIE L W ZIVKOVICH 2337 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 THOMAS V BEVERLY L ANTILLEY 2361 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403 JOEL E HEIDI M LEHRKE 2329 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 DOUGLAS VERNON JOHNSON 2322 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 TOM SOMMANA MONTHISANE 2381 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7413 RICHARD B CHRYSAUNA A BUAN 2369 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7413 WILLIAM A LORRAINE RODRIGUEZ 2357 STONE CREEK LN W CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7413 THOMAS E MARY K WITEK 2318 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403 JEFFREY J ABIGAIL M WILSON 2332 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403 JOHN D JODEE A MURPHY 2360 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403 JOHN F LAURIE SULLIVAN 2346 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403 JOSHUA T KRIENKE CHRISTINA A KRIENKE 2375 STONE CREEK DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7403 DANIEL J PAMELA J CULHANE 2333 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 JEFFREY J KARLA M ALTHOFF 2326 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 KELLY K MORLOCK SARA B ROMANSKI MORLOCK 2325 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 CHARLENE A STENDER 2321 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 JAMES M JENNIFER D LARRANAGA 2318 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 DOUGLAS G SARAH P HIPSKIND 2317 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 WELLS FARGO BANK NA C O SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING 3815 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 4412 RORY D AMY J LEA 2313 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 GERHARD HELENE A SCHOCK 2309 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 DELORIS B HOLASEK TRUST C O HOLASEK FARMS LP 2015 STAHLKE WAY CHASKA MN 55318 3239 SCOTT T NICOLE M BRUSH 2301 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 MICHAEL JACQUELINE R MROSKO 2305 BOULDER RD CHANHASSEN MN 55317 7401 VOLK MINGER PROPERTIES LLC 2218 LUKEWOOD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8425 TAUNTON VENTURES LP SNAP FITNESS INC 18760 LAKE DR E CHANHASSEN MN 55317 9384 JC INVESTMENTS OF CHASKA LLC 1405 WEST FARM RD CHASKA MN 55318 9517 CHAN WEST II LLP 8156 MALLORY CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8586 192 MP DEVELOPMENT LLC 2218 LUKEWOOD DR CHANHASSEN MN 55317 8425 CARLSTON COMMERCIAL RE LLC 8150 DREXEL CT EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 2189 WAYTEK INC 2440 GALPIN CT CHANHASSEN MN 55317 4621 193 Public Hearing Notification Area 500 feet Business impact Group Snap Fitness 2411 Galpin Court City of Chanhassen Planning Case 07 27 r I i I I 1 I l I jnd1e i Q fl Ii S tone Creek Ln W stone Cres f mL f o J ct i i F g 1 11 0 i liil 0 Property Glee Or s one Creek O 0 4 r t 1 Cll J t O 0 A q d Qe o Lyman Blvd C R 18 I i f j i 0 j 194 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site www ci chanhassen mn us 3 MEMORANDUM 0 TO Paul Oehme Director of Public Works City Engineer FROM Terrance Jeffery Water Resources Coordinator r February 11 2008 DATE SUBJ MS 4 Nondegradation SWMP 15B Approve Distribution of Plan SUMMARY Staff is recommending that the Nondegradation Assessment be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in compliance with the NPDES Phase II permit as revised June 1 2006 A public hearing was held at the January 15 2008 Planning Commission The City of Chanhassen was required to submit the non degradation Plan to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in compliance with the NPDES Phase II permit as revised June 1 2006 by February 1 2008 Staff has communicated with the MPCA a request to extend the deadline to February 12 2008 This extension was granted ACTION REQUIRED A simple majority vote of City Council present BACKGROUND In June of 2006 the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency PCA issuedPermit No MNR040000 General Permit Authorization to DischargeStormwater Associated with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems MS4 Among other items this permit identified 30 select cities which are required to develop a Nondegradation Assessment and Implementation Plan within a certain time frame These communities are referred to as Selected MS4s The selection of these communities was based upon population growth experienced or projected to be experienced for three time frames 1990 to 2000 from 2000 to 2003 and from 2000 to 2020 The City of Chanhassen is required to submit theirnondegradation assessment plan within 20 months February 1 2008 from the dateofissuance of the above referenced permit The City h as requested an extension of the submittal date to February 12 2008 to allow for coordination with scheduled City meetings Wenck Associates Inc was the Nondegradation Plan on October 31 2006 A draft of the plan has been attached for your review The The City of Chanhassen A growingc9 f IJljJm ljgs eft Jl 8b 82 P6l sAfpqgWlllV l a OJ l town thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 195 Paul Oehme MS 4 Nondegradation Approve Distribution of Plan February 11 2008 Page 2 Nondegradation Plan was presented to the Planning Commission on January 15 2008 and public comment was received at this time Copies of the Nondegradation Plan have been sent to Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Lower MN River Watershed District Carver County Watershed Management Organization Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services on December 15 2007 The Plan has also been made available on the City s website and printed copies are available at City Hall Written comments have been received from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services the Lower MN River Watershed District and seven Chanhassen Residents These comments have been included for your review and consideration Staff and a representative from Wenck will be making a short presentation on the assessment findings and subsequent timeline of events NONDEGRADA TION REQUIREMENTS The selected MS4s are required to assess changes in base loading of three parameters to their waters from 1988 loading levels These three parameters are total stormwater volume total suspended solids TSS and total phosphorus TP If new or expanded discharges are found to exist or to be likely to exist the City of Chanhassen must develop a nondegradation plan which will need to be developed and submitted to the PCA identifying what reasonable and practical best management practices BMPs the City will implement to reduce these discharges to the 1988 levels These BMPs will be incorporated as revisions to the existing Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP for the City of Chanhassen SUMMARY OF NONDEGRADA TION FINDINGS The City of Chanhassen has already implemented a number of policies and practices which have aided in the reduction of pollutant loading to area waters These include street sweeping reforestation measures tree preservation planning tools such as density transfer and the Bluff Creek Overlay District and others As a result the City is projected to meet nondegradation requirements for total phosphorus and total suspended solids for the City as a whole However there are individual watersheds which will not meet nondegradation requirements for TSS and TP These areas include Lake Ann which has experienced minimal development to date but based upon proposed land uses through 2020 will undergo land use changes which will affect the loading of Lake Ann The Riley Purgatory and Bluff Creek Watersheds will also not meet nondegradation requirements This is not inconsistent with the fact that many of these waters are listed as impaired by the PCA The PCA has yet to determine if the assessments will be applied on a citywide basis or on a per watershed basis g eng terry npdes phase ii nondeg 021108 app dist of plan doc 196 Paul Oehme MS 4 Nondegradation Approve Distribution of Plan February 11 2008 Page 3 The City will not meet the nondegradation requirements for total stormwater volume As areas within Chanhassen are converted to an urbanized land use the amount of impervious surface increases and there is a net reduction in native vegetation Vegetation acts to intercept rainfall before it reaches the ground and becomes runoff This process is referred to as abstraction Additional construction activities compact the soils and this soil compaction decreases the ability of water to seep or infiltrate into the soil and increases the amount of stormwater that runs off the site This overall increase in impervious surface and decrease in native vegetation results in an increase in total runoff volume Impacts from this increase in runoff are evidenced by the accelerated erosion within Bluff Creek and the bouncing fluctuation of lake levels within Chanhassen Lakes IMPLICA TIONS FOR CHANHASSEN The City is required to submit a Nondegradation Plan to the MPCA by February 1 2008 extended to February 12 2008 per subsequent agreement Prior to submittal to the PCA the City is required to publicly notice the proposed SWPPP revisions as related to the Nondegradation Report and Implementation Plan and the Nondegradation Report and Implementation Plan must be made available to the public and to local water authorities including the Lower Minnesota River Watershed District the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Carver County Watershed Management Organization By permit directive the City must consider alternatives explain which alternatives have been studied but rejected and why and propose alternatives that are reasonable and practical The report must give high priority to BMPs best management practices that address impacts of future growth such as ordinances for new development This language recognizes the difficulties with retrofitting storm water management techniques into developed areas and that changes are better suited to new development where land use constraints aren t as pronounced Upon approval of the Nondegradation Plan by the PCA the City will need to begin revising their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP to incorporate changes in practice policy and education necessary to bring those areas which will not meet nondegradation requirements to a level consistent with 1988 loading The staff will continue to work with local water authorities City Council and Planning Commission to determine how to best achieve the desired outcomes The proposed SWPPP revisions within the Nondegradation Plan direct the City to begin the due diligence necessary to determine which if any code changes are necessary what existing practices can be incorporated into the SWPPP what additions or revisions to educational programming are needed and what partnership opportunities are available and what changes to street pond and g eng terry npdes phase ii nondeg 0211 08 app dist of plan doc 197 Paul Oehme MS 4 Nondegradation Approve Distribution of Plan February 11 2008 Page 4 structural BMP maintenance and operations are needed The revised NPDES permit and SWPPP will then be provided to the agencies for their review At this time no specific changes are proposed to the SWPPP other than the City begins evaluating alternatives on their merits and incorporate those accepted changes at a later date The City of Chanhassen already has a number of practices and planning tools in place which can be incorporated into the SWPPP with minimal revision As an example these tools include the City s Tree Preservation Plan the Arbor Day Event the Bluff Creek Overlay District and density transfer Staff has begun researching the changes to policy practice and education incorporated by other Cities and Local Water Authorities and will apprise the Council of their findings at future meetings RECOMMENDA TION Staff is recommending that the City Council authorizes the distribution of the Nondegradation Assessment Plan on February 12 2008 to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency per NPDES Phase II requirements ATTACHMENTS 1 Chanhassen s Draft Nondegradation Assessment prepared by Wenck Associates dated December 2007 text only 2 Letter of comment from the Metropolitan Council dated December 26 2007 3 Email from Shelley Strohmaier dated 1 14 08 4 Email from Dave Susla dated 1 14 08 5 Email from Joe Pfankuch dated 1 15 08 6 Email from Mary Borns dated 1 15 08 7 Email from Steve Donen dated 1 15 08 8 Email from Scott Maeyaert dated 1 15 08 9 Email from Greg Fletcher dated 1 15 08 10 Memorandum from Boonestroo on behalf of the Lower MN River Watershed District dated January 8 2008 received via email on February 1 2008 g eng terry npdes phase ii nondeg 021108 app dist of plan doc 198 Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment Review D R AFT Prepared for City of Chanhassen Minnesota December 2007 I I 199 Wenck File 1481 03 Prepared for CITY OF CHANHASSEN MINNESOTA Prepared by WENCK ASSOCIATES INC 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P O Box 249 Maple Plain Minnesota 55359 0249 763 479 4200 Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment ReviewD RA F T December 2007 Wenck 200 Table of Contents 1 0 INTRODUCTION 3 1 1 Introduction 3 2 0 LAND USE AND P8 MODELING 4 2 1 P8 Model Construction and Organization 4 2 2 Land Use Assessment 5 2 3 Imperviousness Assessment 10 2 4 Pervious Curve Numbers 12 2 5 Other P8 Inputs 13 2 6 Model Validation and Assumptions 13 3 0 CURRENT WATER QUALITY TREATMENT CAPACITY 15 3 1 Applicable Rules Codes and Ordinances 15 3 1 1 Chanhassen Codes and Ordinances 15 3 1 2 Riley Purgatory Creek Bluff Creek Watershed District 15 3 1 3 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 16 3 1 4 Lower Minnesota Watershed District 16 3 2 Treatment Device Quantification 16 3 3 Year Built For Developments 16 3 4 Application of Rules 18 3 5 Street Sweeping 19 4 0 MODEL RESULTS 20 4 1 Organization 20 4 2 Load Changes 20 4 3 Current BMP Treatment 22 4 3 1 Development Rules 22 4 3 2 Street Sweeping 23 4 3 3 Volume 24 4 3 4 TSS Loading 24 4 3 5 TP Loading 25 4 4 Model Sensitivity 25 5 0 SUMMARY AND PROPOSED BMPS 27 5 1 Total Suspended Solids 27 5 1 1 Regulatory Program 27 5 1 2 Street Sweeping 28 5 1 3 Lake Ann Subwatershed 28 5 1 4 Other Activities 29 5 2 Total Phosphorus 29 5 2 1 Regulatory Program 29 5 2 2 Street Sweeping 29 5 2 3 Lake Ann and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Subwatersheds 30 5 2 4 Other Activities 30 5 3 Volume 30 201 5 3 1 Regulatory Program 31 5 3 2 Education Program 33 5 3 3 Structural Improvements 33 5 3 4 N on structural Improvements 34 6 0 SWPPP MODIFICATIONS 36 6 1 Total Suspended Solids 36 6 1 1 Regulatory Program 36 6 1 2 Street Sweeping 36 6 1 3 Lake Ann Subwatershed 36 6 1 4 Other Activities 37 6 2 Total Phosphorus 37 6 2 1 Regulatory Program 37 6 2 2 Street Sweeping 37 6 2 3 Lake Ann and Riley Purgatory Creek Subwatersheds 37 6 2 4 Other Activities 38 6 3 Volume 38 6 3 1 Regulatory Program 38 6 3 2 Education Program 38 6 3 3 Structural Improvements 39 6 3 4 N on structural Improvements 39 TABLES Table 2 1 Current status of UAA analyses in the City of Chanhassen 4 Table 2 2 Land use categories for the City of Chanhassen 5 Table 2 3 Land use acreages in the City of Chanhassen for the three key time periods 5 Table 2 4 Impervious fractions by land use from the UAAs LANDSAT analysis and those fractions used in this study 10 Table 2 5 Digitized impervious and pervious acres for commercial and industrial areas in Eden Prairie 10 Table 2 6 Total change in upland imperviousness in the City of Chanhassen 12 Table 2 7 Curve numbers by land use and soil type 12 Table 2 8 Runoff and loading by curve number from a test watershed in P8 13 Table 2 9 Monitored and predicted volume and water quality for Purgatory Creek 14 Table 3 1 Estimated areas that developed under watershed district rules by subwatershed 18 Table 3 2 Riley Purgatory Bluff Watershed District rules 18 Table 3 3 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules 18 Table 3 4 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District rules 19 Table 3 5 Measured mass of material removed from street sweeping in the City of Chanhassen 19 Table 4 1 Raw increases in imperviousness volume TSS and TP for the City of Chanhassen from 1990 to 2020 21 Table 4 2 Predicted TSS and TP load increases between 1990 and 2020 and estimated removal due to development rules 22 202 Table 4 3 Particle size breakdown by NURP particle size class for three samples taken from street sweepings in Eden Prairie 23 Table 4 4 TSS and TP removal as a result of street sweeping in the City of Chanhassen 23 Table 4 5 Predicted volume increases in the City of Chanhassen between 1990 and 2020 24 Table 4 6 Predicted TSS load increases between 1990 and 2020 in comparison to BMP removals 24 Table 4 7 Predicted TP load increases between 1990 and 2020 in comparison to BMP removals 25 Table 4 8 Rice Marsh subwatershed TSS loading and removals for the 50th and 90th percentiles of the NURP studies 26 Table 4 9 Rice Marsh subwatershed TP loading and removals for the 50th and 90th percentiles of the NURP studies 26 FIGURES Figure 2 1 Subwatershed Map 6 Figure 2 2 1990 Land Use 7 Figure 2 3 2000 Land Use 8 Figure 2 4 2020 Land use 9 Figure 2 5 MPCA 1998 Landsat Imagery Impervious 11 Figure 3 1 Hennepin County Year Built by Rule Change 17 Figure 5 1 Annual Stormwater Volume That Could Be Captured Through Abstraction Infiltration 31 TECHNICAL APPENDICES A East Chaska Creek B Lake Ann C Lake Lucy D Lake Mitchell E Lake Riley F Lake Susan G Lotus Lake H Lower Minnesota River I Minnehaha Creek WD J Rice Marsh Lake K Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek WD L Silver Lake M Sweepings Analysis N Analytical Methods Detail 203 Executive Summary This study is completed in response to the Nondegradation Assessment requirement of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as part of the City s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPDES Phase II permit The purpose of this study is to assess changes in storm water runoff volume total suspended solids TSS and total phosphorus TP loading in the City of Chanhassen since 1988 and to predict how land change expected to occur between now and 2020 would impact those parameters This analysis is to be used to identify Best Management Practices to be undertaken to return to 1988 or better conditions A key component of this analysis is an assessment of the change in impervious surface due to land use change The percent impervious area varies in the City with most subwatersheds between 20 and 35 percent impervious 1990 16 2000 20 2020 28 This analysis estimated the pollutant loads and stormwater volumes for three key years 1990 a proxy for 1988 2000 and 2020 Much of the land use change in Chanhassen since 1988 occurred under regulation to protect water quality Additionally the City currently undertakes Best Management Practices BMPs to improve water quality The pollutant load and volume reductions associated with those BMPs were estimated to determine the net impact to stormwater volume and TSSffP load since 1988 and predicted to occur between now and 2020 Removal bv BMP Net Total Total Total Develop Removal Parameter Load Load Increase Street or Net 1990 2020 1990 2020 ment Sweeping Increase Rules Total 1 274 100 2 060 167 786 067 933 108 254 446 401 488 Suspended lbs yr Ibs yr lbs yr lbs yr lbs yr lbs yr Solids Total 4 555 7 243 2 688 3 073 589 974 Phosphorus lbs vr Ibs yr lbs yr lbs yr lbs yr lbs yr Runoff 5 488 8 324 2 836 None None 2 836 Volume acre feet acre feet acre feet estimated estimated acre feeU year year year year For the period 1990 2020 this study estimates the City will remove about 400 000 more pounds ofTSS than created since 1988 and 1 880 pounds more TP than created For these two parameters the City meets the MPCA requirement of no net increase in TSS and TP over 1988 conditions However land use change will generate 2 836 acre feet of new runoff volume To address this increase in stormwater volume the City has identified several new BMPs that will over time either reduce stormwater volume or minimize the adverse effects of additional City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 1 D R AFT December 07 204 stormwater volume Managing stormwater volume has the additional benefit of reducing TSS and TP loading by reducing the amount of runoff picking up and transporting pollutants to downstream waters These BMPs include A new requirement on development and redevelopment to abstract remove from runoff by infiltration evapotranspiration capture and reuse etc a portion of annual runoff volume Reducing additional stormwater runoff volume through evapotranspiration by developing and implementing a reforestation program Retrofitting volume management BMPs where opportunities arise such as on City street reconstruction projects and Mitigating volume impacts by stream restoration erosion control projects and shoreline restoration City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 2 DR AFT December 07 205 1 0 INTRODUCTION 1 1 Introduction This study is completed in response to the Nondegradation Assessment requirement of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as part of the City s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPDES Phase II permit The purpose of this study is to assess changes in stormwater runoff volume total suspended solids TSS and total phosphorus TP loading in the City of Chanhassen since 1988 and to predict how land change expected to occur between now and 2020 would impact those parameters This analysis is to be used to identify Best Management Practices BMPs to be undertaken to return to 1988 or better conditions A nondegradation assessment consists of three key steps 1 An assessment of change in land use and imperviousness in the city from 1988 to present and out to 2020 conditions 2 An associated pollutant load change with the land use change for total phosphorus total suspended solids and water volume 3 Identification of current of necessary BMPs to return to 1988 conditions or better This study is organized as follows 1 A description of the City land use change since 1988 and change expected to occur between now and 2020 2 A description of the method used to calculate imperviousness and the results 3 A description of the various input parameters used to model pollutant loading and stormwater runoff volumes 4 A review of the existing BMPs designed to reduce pollutant loading including a history of watershed and city rules and ordinances regulating development and redevelopment the maintenance of sump manholes that collect material washed into the storm sewer system from the landscape and the street sweeping program 5 A detailed presentation of the results of water quality and quantity modeling reported by subwatershed in the city These results estimate the amount of new TSS and TP loading and stormwater runoff volumes resulting from land use change in the City 6 An analysis of the amount of pollutant loading removed by the BMPs described above 7 The net impact of those BMPs in reducing the increased TSS and TP load and new stormwater volume 8 Identification of new BMPs the City could undertake to return to 1988 conditions or better or mitigate the impacts of increases 9 Proposed modifications to the City s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan to plan to implement those BMPs City ofChanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 3 D R AFT December 07 206 2 0 LAND USE AND P8 MODELING 2 1 P8 Model Construction and Organization Modeling for much of the City has already been completed through the preparation of Use Attainability Assessments UAAs for many of the lake watersheds in Chanhassen by the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed District Table 2 1 The UAAs include both watershed load modeling and in lake response modeling The UAAs are used to identify potential improvement projects and estimate the costs to restore the waterbody to meet selected water quality goals UAAs have not been completed for Lake Minnewashta nor Rice Lake T bl 2 1 C fUAA h C fCh h a e urrent status 0 analyses m t e Ity 0 an assen Watershed Water Body Status Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Mitchell Lake Completed Rice Marsh Lake Completed Lake Riley Completed Lake Susan Completed Lotus Lake Completed Lake Lucy Completed Lake Ann Completed Silver Lake Completed Minnehaha Creek Lake Minnewashta Not Completed Lower Minnesota Rice Lake Not Completed The UAAs include a P8 model developed for each of the lake watersheds P8 Program for Predicting Polluting Particle Passage thru Pits Puddles Ponds is a public domain http wwwalker net p8 industry standard model developed to assess pollutant loading in urban watersheds P8 was developed using National Urban Runoff Program NURP data and provides loading estimates based on data collected as a part of the NURP program P8 was designed to assess the effectiveness of BMP implementation in reducing runoff loads from impervious surfaces and provides a tool for evaluating other non structural practices such as street sweeping These models represent the best tools available for predicting watershed loads under current conditions The models provided by the watershed districts were the basis for the City s assessment For the assessment the P8 model subwatersheds were maintained as well as the device configurations However imperviousness and the pervious curve numbers were updated based on evaluations of land use LANDSAT data and aerial photo interpretation Selection of these input variables is described later in this report It is important to note the modeling is not focused on absolute values rather the purpose is to assess relative change among the time periods The modeling does need to be close to real world values to assess the impact of current activities on loading The modeling was developed for this purpose and is not intended to be a calibrated loading model City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 4 D R AFT December 07 207 The analysis was conducted according to the receiving water including ten lakes Figure 2 1 Although the analysis focused on changes in loading to the lakes the subwatershed detail was maintained in the model for future evaluation of projects on water quality 2 2 Land Use Assessment Land use data was collected from the City of Chanhassen which used the same land use categories to classify land use in 1990 2000 and planned 2020 These data were combined into a representative group of categories Table 2 2 Figures 2 2 2 3 and 2 4 1990 data was selected as a surrogate for 1988 because land use data was readily available for 1990 and not 1988 Little change occurred in the City between 1988 and 1990 The resultant coverages are the best estimate of land use for the three critical time periods including 1990 2000 present and 2020 These data were compiled for the City of Chanhassen Table 2 3 The 2020 land use coverage assumes build out conditions and that no agricultural or vacant land will remain in the City A near doubling of the land area used as single family residential is expected between 1990 and 2020 along with significant increases in industrial and office uses Large lot rural residential uses are also expected to be converted to other more intense uses T bI 2 3 L d th Ct f Ch h thth kf d a e an use acrea esm e uyo an assen or e ree ey lme perlO s Land Use Categories 1990 Land use acres 2000 Land Use acres 2020 Land Use acres Agriculture 2 880 1 639 0 Commercial 246 246 310 Industrial 327 557 848 Maior Highway 443 447 794 Multi Family Residential 60 96 517 Office Institutional 58 98 392 Open Water 1 636 1 636 1 636 Parks 1 461 1 762 1 967 Rural Residential 1 568 1 425 1 055 Railway 104 104 108 Single Family Residential 2 447 3 641 4 713 Vacant 1 112 691 2 Wetlands type 1 2 6 7 8 591 591 591 Wetlands type 3 4 5 1 647 1 647 1 647 TOTAL 14 581 14 581 14 581 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 5 D R AFT December 07 208 Legend Oly of Chanhassen BoundafY Lakes Maj or Roads Subwatersheds c 3 East Chaska Creek c s Lake Ann C3 Lake Lucy c 3 Lake Mitchell III LakeRiley III Lake Susan C3 Lotus Lake c 3 Lower MN River III Mn nehaha Creel III Rice Ma sh Lake c 3 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek East III Ril Purgatory Bluff Creel West III Silver Lake Subwatersheds Source CUyof Chanhassen 0 5 o I L 1481 1 81 03w l finE l Flgs1Flgure 2 1 Su elUled Wep mxd as Modi ed 11912007 11 27 50 Mol CITY OF CHANHASSEN Subwatershed Map 1 I Miles I Wenc WenCk Assoclares I I nc 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Environmental Engineers Maple Plain MN 55359 l 129 JUL 2007 Figure 2 1 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessn1ent 6 D R AFT December 07 209 n01 Legend City of Chanhassen BoundaiY 1990 Land Use Agri cu Ilure Rural R esidenlial Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Com me ri cal Ind usl ri al o fn cell nsti tu ti ona I Parks Vacant Wetland Types 1 2 6 7 8 Wetland Types 3 4 5 Open Water Major Highway Rail 1990 Land Use Source City of Chanhassen 0 5 o 1 I Miles N J r 1 M tl L 1481 1481 03w xd final Figs lgu 2 21990 Land U lfl d Leu Mocfi6ed 11912007 11 45 55 M CITY OF CHANHASSEN 199 0 Land Use I Wenc WenCk Assoclares I nc 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Environmental Engineers Maple Plain MN 55359 l 129 JUL 2007 Figure 2 2 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessn1ent 7 D R AFT December 07 210 Legend City of Chanhassen Boundary 2000 Land Use Agricul to re Rural Residential Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Commerical Industrial Officell n stitut io na I Par s Vaca nt Wetland Types 1 2 6 7 8 Wetland Types 3 4 5 Open Water Major Highway Railro a d 0 5 o 2000 Land Use Source City of Chanhassen M tl L 1481 1481 03w xd final Figs lgu 2 3 2000 Land U lfl d Leu Mocfi6ed 11912007 11 41 38 M 1 I Miles N J r 1 I Wenc WenCk Associates I nc 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Environmental Engineers Maple Plain MN 55359 l 129 JUL 2007 Figure 2 3 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2000 Land Use City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessn1ent 8 D R AFT December 07 211 Legend D Oly of Chanhassen Boundary 2020 Land Use Agriculture Rural Residenlial Single Famity Residential 11M Multi Family Residential Commerical Industrial OfficeJl n stituti on al Parks Vacanl Wetland Types 1 2 6 7 8 Wet land Types 3 4 5 Open Water Major Highways Railroad 01 0 5 o 2020 Land Use Source City of Chanhassen 1 I Miles N J r 1 Mxd L 1481 1481 03Vn XI Final Figs Flgure 2 4 2020 land UreJfl I last Modi ed 71912007 11 49 29 Nt I Wenc WenCk Assoclares I nc 1800 Pi oneer Creek Center Environmental Engineers Maple Plain MN 55359 l 129 JUL 2007 Figure 2 4 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 2020 Land Use City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessn1ent 9 D R AFT December 07 212 2 3 Imperviousness Assessment To estimate the imperviousness in the City assumed percent imperviousness by land use from the watershed district supplied models and LANDSAT imagery were assessed Table 2 4 Figure 2 5 The LANDSAT impervious fraction is an area weighted average of imperviousness for all pixels or partial pixels falling in each land use classification The values were in relative agreement except for commercial and industrial areas Aerial photos were analyzed to determine the imperviousness of these two land uses The selected values for the modeling were chosen based on aerial photo interpretation or based on an evaluation of LANDSAT estimated imperviousness as well as knowledge of the area and to provide a conservative approach Table 2 4 Impervious fractions by land use from the UAAs LANDSAT analysis and those fractions used in h d t IS stu Iy LANDSAT Impervious UAA Impervious Selected Impervious Land Use Fractions Fractions Fractions Agriculture 0 11 0 03 0 05 Commercial 0 58 0 85 0 67 Industriall 0 51 0 75 0 55 Multi Family Residential 0 33 0 65 0 55 Parks and Recreation Areas 0 07 0 02 0 10 Office Institutional 0 35 0 50 0 35 Railway 0 09 N A 0 20 Roadway 0 36 0 50 0 50 Rural Residential 0 09 N A 0 09 Single Family Residential 0 20 0 30 0 25 Vacant 0 11 0 03 0 05 h Verified through aerI31 photo analysIs N A Not available An aerial photo assessment of impervious areas in the adjacent City of Eden Prairie evaluated a total of 376 commercial acres as well as 628 industrial acres Table 2 5 Impervious and pervious areas were digitized to estimate the area of impervious surfaces in these land use categories Although they represent a very small area parking lot islands were considered impervious because of soil compaction in these areas Commercial areas were determined to be approximately 67 impervious while industrial areas were determined to be 46 impervious Commercial development in Chanhassen is very similar to Eden Prairie However the LANDSAT impervious fraction for industrial was 51 and 75 was used in the UAAs This study used 55 as the impervious fraction for industrial uses based on the LANDSAT data T bl 2 5 D f d d 1 d d t l Ed Pr e a e l2IllZe ImpervIous an pervIous acres or commercia an m us rI3 areas m en alrI Category Commercial Industrial Acres Percent Acres Percent Pervious 123 33 341 54 Impervious 253 67 287 46 TOTAL 376 100 628 100 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 10 DR AFT December 07 213 Legend It J Qly of Cllan hassen Boun dary 2 Lakes Major Roads 1998 Landsat l o Impervious D0 10 D 11 20 D 21 30 31 40 41 50 D 51 600 00 D 61 700 00 7 1 80 81 90 91 1000 0 I fIIIII r rI t T i i h I of r t I t J L r Landsat Imagery Source MPCA 0 5 0 1 I Miles N J or 1 M J L 1481 1 81 03 I finE l FIgs1Flgure 2 s lMdS lmngery rnxd lod MocUe d 71912007 11 51 06 AM CITY OF CHANHASSEN MPCA 1998 Landsat Imagery 0 0 Impervious I Wenc WenCk Assoclares I nc 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Environmental Engineers Maple Plain MN 55359 l 129 JUL 2007 Figure 2 5 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessn1ent 11 D R AFT December 07 214 Upland areas areas excluding lake and wetland surface areas in the City went from 16 impervious in 1990 to a projected imperviousness of 28 in 2020 Table 2 6 The Lake Mitchell and Rice Marsh lake watersheds demonstrated the greatest impervious fractions with 54 and 39 impervious areas respectively T bl 2 6 T t I h I d th C t fCh h a e o a c an e In uplan ImperVIOusness In e IlY 0 an assen Watershed Watershed Percent Imperviousl ID Area acres 1990 2000 2020 Lake Ann 130 7 9 15 Chaska Creek 177 18 23 31 Lotus Lake 998 24 24 24 Lower MN River 509 15 15 20 Lake Lucy 707 13 17 23 Minnehaha Creek WD 2 047 18 19 21 Lake Mitchell 129 31 55 54 Rice Marsh Lake 586 32 36 39 Lake Riley 683 11 15 25 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek WD 3 532 10 15 30 Silver Lake 113 20 25 25 Lake Susan 1 082 22 29 36 TOTAL 10 694 16 20 28 II Does not Include wetland and lake surface areas 2 4 Pervious Curve Numbers The second key piece of information for the P8 model is a curve number for the pervious areas in the model The SCS curve number reflects an area weighted average of the pervious areas considering soil types land use and hydrologic groups Table 2 7 lists the values used in the P8 modeling as a function of land use hydrologic condition and soil group T bl 2 7 C b bid d It a e urve num ers JY an use an so type Hydrolo ic Soil Grou Land Use A B C D AID BID B C AIB AlC Unclassified Agricultural 2 49 69 79 84 66 5 76 5 74 59 64 70 25 Roadway 2 49 69 79 84 66 5 76 5 74 59 64 70 25 Single Family Residential 2 39 61 74 80 59 5 70 5 67 5 50 56 5 63 5 Park and Recreation 1 39 61 74 80 59 5 70 5 67 5 50 56 5 63 5 Commercial 2 49 69 79 84 66 5 76 5 74 59 64 70 25 Multi Family Residential 1 39 61 74 80 59 5 70 5 67 5 50 56 5 63 5 Vacant 1 39 61 74 80 59 5 70 5 67 5 50 56 5 63 5 Industrial 3 68 79 86 89 78 5 84 82 5 73 5 77 80 5 Railway 3 68 79 86 89 78 5 84 82 5 73 5 77 80 5 OfficelInstitutional 1 39 61 74 80 59 5 70 5 67 5 50 56 5 63 5 I SIngle famIly reSidentIal park and recreatIon multIfannly reSidentIal vacant and office InstItutIonal were considered to be in good condition 2 Agricultural commercial and highways and roadways were considered to be in fair condition 3 Industrial and rail were considered to be in poor condition City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 12 D R AFT December 07 215 2 5 Other P8 Inputs Other model input is the particle precipitation and temperature file The particle file used was the P8 default NURP50 particle file Both the precipitation and temperature files used were obtained from UAA models All models were run for the same 10 year period 1992 to 2002 with 5 passes through the precipitation file 2 6 Model Validation and Assumptions Modeling was conducted for all loading in the City including loading from other NPDES Phase II permit holders Other permit holders include MnlDOT Carver County and Hennepin County These loadings were included in this assessment The modeling approach presented here is a conservative approach to assess nondegradation The P8 model was developed for urban watersheds However one of the critical aspects of this modeling is the change in loading that occurs as land is converted from open or agriculture to developed land To test the P8 model s handling of open space a test watershed 100 acres was run for an average precipitation year Table 2 8 Curve numbers in the model for open space and agriculture typically ranged from 60 to 70 Because of the low runoff 1 4 inches the loading rates for open land with these curve numbers is very low This may be artificially lowering the runoff from these areas especially if the current land use is agriculture However to maintain a conservative approach these numbers were maintained in the model T bl 2 8 R ff did b b f h d P8 a e uno an oa lOll y curve num er rom a test waters e In TSS load TP load eN Runoff in IbsJaclvr TSS ppm IbsJaclyr TP ppm 50 0 3 0 7 12 0 01 0 127 55 0 5 2 17 0 01 0 138 60 0 7 4 22 0 02 0 150 65 1 0 7 29 0 04 0 167 70 1 4 13 40 0 06 0 193 75 1 9 24 55 0 10 0 226 80 2 7 44 71 0 16 0 263 85 4 0 82 89 0 28 0 305 90 6 3 163 114 0 52 0 363 95 11 0 366 148 1 09 0 440 Impervious 26 1 649 110 2 09 0 354 NURP 50 Impervious 26 1 1947 330 4 43 0 750 NURP 90 To validate the model model results were compared to stream data collected as a part of the Watershed Outlet Monitoring Program WOMP Table 2 9 For the WOMP data a close to average year precipitation was selected to evaluate Data are presented as flow weighted means or on a unit area basis This makes the data comparable even though the model was only run for the City of Eden Prairie portion of the watersheds The model typically over predicted runoff and loading for the Purgatory Creek watershed in Eden Prairie Although the model does not City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 13 DR AFT December 07 216 account for receiving water processes it represents a conservative estimate of loading from the land Table 2 9 Monitored and redicted volume and water uatit Creek Runoff Flow TSS load Flow Watershed Year in Weighted Ibs aclyr Weighted TP TSS m Purgatory 2004 7 23 38 160 Creek TP load Ibs aclyr 0 26 Modeled 10 93 217 314 Data calculated from WOMP station for entire watershed 2Data calculated for City of Eden Prairie portion of watershed using NURP50 file 0 73 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 14 D R AFT December 07 217 3 0 CURRENT WATER QUALITY TREATMENT CAPACITY Understanding the BMPs and water quality treatment devices in the watershed is vital in assessing load changes in the City between 1988 and present Additionally assessing whether the current practices are sufficient for protecting water quality into the future can help guide City activities to assure compliance with nondegradation 3 1 Applicable Rules Codes and Ordinances Applicable watershed district rules and City codes and ordinances that address water quality were reviewed to determine the current treatment capacity in the City resulting from regulation 3 1 1 Chanhassen Codes and Ordinances Wetlands Provides for management of wetlands and wetland impacts by management classification as determined by a functions and values assessment Ordinance specifies allowable hydrologic change in wetlands and buffer and setback standards by classification Shore land Management Establishes structure septic system and drain field setbacks and minimum lot sizes regulates grading and filling activities and alteration of natural vegetation in the shoreland management area and regulates onsite sewerage systems in the shoreland area Also specifies maximum impervious coverage by land use type and regulates placement and design of roads driveways and parking areas Bluff Creek Overlay District Contains a number of regulations to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor wetlands bluffs trees and general environmental quality in the Overlay District This ordinance encourages minimization of new impervious surface cluster development and other Low Impact Design elements and requires a Natural Habitat Restoration Plan mitigating impacts to natural habitat areas in the Overlay District Surface Water Management Sets forth water quantity and quality requirements Rate control and NURP Ievel treatment is required on new developments Additional treatment requirements are established for developments that discharge to higher waterbodies Where developments discharge to Riley or Purgatory Creek new runoff is prohibited from increasing the flow rate in the creek 3 1 2 Riley Purgatory Creek Bluff Creek Watershed District The District s regulatory program was formally established in 1996 Projects to alter or disturb land surfaces in excess of one acre fill within the 100 year floodplain or fill within a wetland are required to meet NURP design requirements and include skimming of floatable materials City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 15 DR AFT December 07 218 No specific rate or volume control is required According to Bob Obermeyer former engineer for the District standards have been in place since 1977 for projects altering more than one acre The early emphasis was simply on erosion control but in the early 80s started looking for sedimentation control and treatment The design criteria used was to provide sufficient surface settling area to remove a 0 1 mm particle based on a 10 year 1 65 in 30 minutes storm event Obermeyer pers corresp 6 8 06 7 12 06 3 1 3 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The District s regulatory program was formally established in 1974 and has been periodically revised since that time The standards in place since 1988 apply to all land alterations except for residential developments ofless than two acres Wet detention basins meeting NURP design requirements are required except that developments less than 40 acres can choose to purchase regional storm water storage credits The District s current regulatory program requires all projects to incorporate Best Management Practices including site design structural and non structural practices Water quality requirements depend on the land use and size of project Generally NURP Ievel treatment is required for developments of 8 acres or more 3 1 4 Lower Minnesota Watershed District The District s regulatory program was formally established in 1999 A Runoff Management Plan RMP is required for residential projects in excess of 5 acres or nonresidential projects in excess of one acre or projects meeting other criteria Runoff from the site after development must not exceed the peak runoff from the site predevelopment for the 20 percent chance 5 year and I percent chance lOO year storm event The one LMWD lake in Chanhassen Rice Lake is a Level IV lake requiring runoff treatment prior to discharge to NURP standards except that dead storage must be provided for a 2 inch event rather than a 2 5 inch event 3 2 Treatment Device Quantification The City of Chanhassen s pond and wetland database was reviewed to assess the ability to quantify the treatment capacity in the City The most important data includes pond dead storage or bottom and surface areas Flood pool storage is also useful but not critical Pond surface areas are available but it is not known if all ponds are included For the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed the data are available in the P8 model supplied by the District Consequently the treatment capacity was estimated based on the year the lot was developed and the District or City rules in place at the time 3 3 Year Built For Developments The first step in identifying the rules under which development occurred is to determine the date when a lot was developed Hennepin and Carver Counties maintain a GIS layer that includes the development year for a particular tax lot Figure 3 1 The City was then broken into areas based on the period in which different watershed rules were in place Realizing that some development can still occur without review less than 5 acres each subwatershed was evaluated City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 16 DR AFT December 07 219 Legend n Jl Oly of Chan hassen Boun dary 0 Lakes Major Roads Year Bunt D No Data D Pre 1988 D 1988 1992 1993 Present Year Built Source Char1hassen 0 5 0 M XI L 1481 1481 03lm l 9nal FlgstFlgure 3 1 Year BUlll mxd L Modl6ed 71912007 12 57 02 PM 1 I Miles N J r 1 I Wenc WenCk Assoclares I I nc 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Environmental Engineers Maple Plain MN 55359 l 129 JUL 2007 Figure 3 1 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Hennepin County Year Built by Rule Change City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessn1ent 17 D R AFT December 07 220 to estimate the area of development that occurred under the watershed district rules Table 3 1 This was accomplished by evaluating the dates the lots were built in relation to neighboring lots If several lots were built together the area was assumed to develop under the rules T bl 3 1 Eft d th t d d d h d d t t I b b t h d a e sIma e areas a eve ope un er wa ers e IS rlc ru es y su wa ers e Watershed Estimated Number Estimated Number Fraction Built ID Of New Lots Built Under Rules Under Rules Notes Lake Ann 2 2 1 00 Chaska Creek 20 20 1 00 Lotus Lake 0 65 Estimated Lower MN River 16 10 0 63 Lake Lucy 267 251 0 94 Minnehaha Creek WD 0 70 Estimated Lake Mitchell 13 13 1 00 Rice Marsh Lake 295 282 0 96 Lake Riley 314 290 0 92 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek WD 0 80 Estimated Silver Lake 73 66 0 90 Lake Susan 0 90 Estimated 3 4 Application of Rules Watershed rules were in place in the early 1980s however the key rules are those in place after 1988 Since the early 1990s the pond design was the National Urban Runoff Program NURP standard and is assumed to provide a 50 to 60 total phosphorus reduction and a 70 to 80 total suspended solids reduction T bl 3 2 Ril Po BI ff W h dD a e ey r atory u aters e Istnct ru es TP TSS Volume Year Built Reduction Reduction Reduction Notes Pre 1988 0 0 0 Some WQ reduction starting in early to mid 80s 1988 1992 50 60 1 70 80 I 0 Provide dead storage for the lO year 30 min event 1 65 inches 1993 2007 50 60 2 70 80 2 0 Rules NURP Provide dead storage for the 2 5 inch 24 hr event 1 Assumed based on the rule 2 Assumed based on NURP standards Table 3 3 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules TP TSS Volume Year Built Reduction Reduction Reduction Notes Pre 1988 50 60 IJ 70 80 IJ 0 1988 1992 50 60 I 70 80 I 0 1993 2007 50 60 2 70 80 2 0 Requirement depends on type of land use and development size 1 Assumed based on the rule 2 Assumed based on NURP standards City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 18 D R AFT December 07 221 Table 3 4 Lower Minnesota River Watershed District rules TP TSS Volume Year Built Reduction Reduction Reduction Notes Pre 1988 0 0 0 Some WQ reduction starting in early to mid 80s 1988 1992 50 60 1 70 80 I 0 Provide dead storage for the lO year 30 min event 1 65 inches 1993 2007 50 60 2 70 80 2 0 Rules NURP Provide dead storage for the 2 5 inch 24 hr event 1 Assumed based on the rule 2 Assumed based on NURP standards 3 5 Street Sweeping The City of Chanhassen has a street sweeping program and maintains detailed records of material removed from streets The City removed between 1 and 6 million pounds of raw material annually between 2004 and 2006 with an average removal of 3 3 million pounds Table 3 5 Table 3 5 Measured mass of material removed from street sweeping in the City of Chanhassen Tons Pounds Material Swept Dry Removed Year Weil ht 2003 2004 1 472 2 944 400 2005 506 1 011 500 2006 2 975 5 950 000 Average 1 651 3 301 967 City ofChanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 19 DR AFT December 07 222 4 0 MODEL RESULTS 4 1 Organization Model results were organized on a receiving water basis with the City s ten lakes as the focus Figure 2 1 Model results are presented in for these subwatersheds Those subwatersheds that drain out of the City or drain to creeks that ultimately drain out of the City without entering a lake were grouped together The details of the P8 models supplied by the watershed districts were maintained and are provided in the Technical Appendices 4 2 Load Changes Changes to impervious area volume TSS and TP for the City of Chanhassen between 1990 and 2020 are presented in Table 4 1 Between 1990 and 2020 the City is expected to add about 1 250 impervious acres resulting in an increased discharge of over 2 800 acre feet of water The increased discharge was predicted to include an additional 786 000 pounds of TSS and 2 690 pounds of total phosphorus City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 20 DR AFT December 07 223 lbs per year 2020 49 2000 31 TP 1990 27 1990 to 2020 2020 13 803 TSS lbs per year 2000 8 635 Raw increases in imperviousness volume TSS and TP for the City of Chanhassen from 1990 7 363 2020 64 ac er year 2000 41 Flow 1990 36 2020 19 Impervious Area acres 2000 11 1990 9 Area acres Watershed In 4 1 e Tabl 130 Lake Ann Chaska Creek 131 568 98 567 79 555 38 448 166 271 28 622 166 222 22 905 162 366 155 682 118 682 99 668 54 240 41 241 31 236 177 998 246 395 193 292 191 235 71 558 117 550 55 417 85 955 54 705 68 607 299 460 242 347 239 285 103 165 76 117 75 91 509 707 1 020 937 901 297 523 272 234 172 261 1 237 1 146 1 106 429 386 368 2 047 241 532 572 2 508 65 916 7 243 1 378 65 765 5t458 1 038 54 588 4 555 739 018 19 092 271 391 2 060 167 394 652 19 095 225 324 1 521 111 290 670 15 771 171 498 1 274 100 2 977 78 1 074 8 324 1 731 78 908 6 370 1 364 66 713 5 488 1 076 28 392 2 979 528 28 319 2 127 358 23 236 1 732 3 532 113 1 082 10t694 Lotus Lake Lower MN River Lake Lucy Minnehaha Creek WD Lake Mitchell Rice Marsh Lake Lake Riley Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek WD Silver Lake Lake Susan TOTAL 241 532 359 n o 1 2 J 9 l i 5 ir I x I 3 142 437 307 49 487 157 846 118 182 49 546 142 930 72 480 28 824 129 130 61 091 193 622 483 193 567 318 116 517 279 70 231 171 70 209 99 40 187 78 129 586 683 to l s l 1 224 4 3 Current BMP Treatment The primary BMPs in the City are load reductions through the application of development rules and street sweeping These BMPs were evaluated to estimate the pollutant removal and volume reduction each were currently providing and could be expected to provide in the future The reductions were summed to estimate the total amount of pollutant removal and applied to the load increase resulting from land use change to determine the net change in pollutant load and stormwater volume between 1990 and 2020 4 3 1 Development Rules To evaluate the impact of application of development rules each parcel in the city was assigned a treatment level depending on when it was built and the treatment rules that were in place at that time For each subwatershed raw and treated TSS and TP loads were calculated for each subwatershed based on land use in 1990 2000 and 2020 The reduction attributed to development rules was calculated as follows Say a parcel that was vacant in 1990 generated a 30 pound per year TSS load After development it generated a raw load of 100 pounds per year TSS Treatment rules were applied to the raw post development load 100 pounds 80 percent removal 80 pounds removed per year This parcel generated a raw load increase of 70 pounds per year but treatment resulted in 80 pounds per year TSS removal Thus development can result in a net decrease in TSS and TP load Treatment rules have been in place since 1988 so development after 1988 was assumed to be treated to NURP standards 80 percent removal TSS 60 percent removal TP However as discussed above some development may not have required treatment The estimated removal due to rules was calculated as the raw load increase times the 80 percent NURP removal rate times the estimated fraction of development built under the rules shown in Table 3 1 Table 4 2 Predicted TSS and TP load increases between 1990 and 2020 and estimated removal due to d I I eve opment ru es Total TSS Development Total TP Development Increase Rules Increase Rules Watershed 1990 2020 TSS Removal 1990 2020 TP Removal ID Ibs vr Ibs vr Ibs vr Ibs vr Lake Ann 6 439 3 975 22 11 Chaska Creek 15 544 17 095 51 88 Lotus Lake 3 905 14 135 13 184 Lower MN River 16 853 16 079 55 88 Lake Lucy 48 943 66 698 160 214 Minnehaha Creek WD 36 351 51 212 119 165 Lake Mitchell 20 663 34 025 99 162 Rice Marsh Lake 28 715 45 232 95 339 Lake Riley 57 091 68 975 265 245 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek WD 448 348 469 214 1 470 1187 Silver Lake 3 321 4 829 11 27 Lake Susan 99 893 141 641 328 362 TOTAL 786 066 933 108 2 688 3 073 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 22 DR AFT December 07 225 4 3 2 Street Sweeping The City of Chanhassen has a street sweeping program and maintains detailed records of material removed from streets Much of the volume of material that accumulates on streets is trash and organic material such as leaves and sand and sediment particles that are too heavy to become suspended in stormwater as TSS To estimate the fraction of material removed by street sweeping that would likely have become a part of the TSS load three samples of street sweepings taken in nearby Eden Prairie were analyzed and an actual particle size distribution developed Based on that analysis it is estimated that about 5 5 percent of the volume of street sweepings was of a particle size that fell into the P8 TSS particle size class distribution see Table 4 3 That percent was applied to the average annual volume of street sweepings removed to obtain an estimate of TSS removal from sweeping To calculate the estimated annual TP removal by street sweeping the P8 fraction of TP associated with TSS 3 850 mglkg was applied to the 3 3 percent that fell into the particle size distribution PO to P50 A literature value of 300 mglkg was applied to the 2 2 percent that fell into the P80 class The annual average removal of TSS and TP was allocated among the watersheds based on the impervious acres in that subwatershed assuming that the subwatersheds with more impervious acres had more road surface that were swept Table 4 4 Table 4 3 Particle size breakdown by NURP particle size class for three samples taken from street sweepings in Eden Prairie NURP of Sample Particle Class Particle Class Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Average PO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 PlO 1 6 1 6 1 1 1 43 P30 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 33 P50 2 2 1 7 0 8 1 57 P80 2 7 2 7 1 1 2 17 Total 2 7 6 5 3 0 5 50 T bl 4 4 TSS d TP It f t t th C t f Ch h a e an remova as a resu o s ree swee lID ID e llV 0 an assen Impervious Watershed TSS Removal TP Removal Watershed ID Area in 2000 acres pounds pounds Lake Ann 11 951 2 Chaska Creek 41 3 521 9 Lotus Lake 241 20 579 50 Lower MN River 76 6 504 16 Lake Lucy 117 9 986 24 Minnehaha Creek WD 386 32 983 80 Lake Mitchell 70 6 019 15 Rice Marsh Lake 209 17 834 43 Lake Riley 99 8 481 21 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek WD 528 45 118 110 Silver Lake 28 2 385 6 Lake Susan 319 27 247 66 TOTAL 2 127 181 608 441 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 23 DR AFT December 07 226 4 3 3 Volume Estimated volume increases for the major subwatersheds in the City are presented in Table 4 5 Although there is potential for a net loss from evaporation from constructed ponds no BMPs or loss have been quantified for this study T bl 4 5 P d t d th C t f Ch h b t 1990 d 2020 a e re IC e vo ume Increases In e uyo an assen e ween an Watershed Total Flow Increase Watershed ID Area acres 1990 2020 ac ft yr Lake Ann 130 28 Chaska Creek 177 56 Lotus Lake 998 14 Lower MN River 509 60 Lake Lucy 707 175 Minnehaha Creek WD 2 047 131 Lake Mitchell 129 76 Rice Marsh Lake 586 105 Lake Riley 683 204 Riley Pur atory Bluff Creek WD 3 532 1 614 Silver Lake 113 12 Lake Susan 1 082 361 TOTAL 10 694 2 836 4 3 4 TSS Loading The total predicted increase in TSS loading from 1990 to 2020 was compared to removals by active BMPs in the City to assess compliance with nondegradation Except for the Lake Ann subwatershed annual TSS removals exceeded the estimated increase between 1990 and 2020 Table 4 6 T bl 46 Pr d d TSS I d b 1990 d 2020 BMP a e e lete oa Increases etween an In comparison to remova s Total TSS TSS Removal Net Increase 1990 2000 2000 2020 Removal or Watershed 1990 2020 Development Development Street Cleaning Net Increase ID Ibs yr Rules lbs Rules lbs lbs lbs Lake Ann 6 439 179 3 796 1 619 845 Chaska Creek 15 544 4 610 12 485 4 646 6 197 Lotus Lake 3 905 5 775 8 360 20 516 30 746 Lower MN River 16 853 338 15 741 8 772 7 998 Lake Lucy 48 943 16 459 50 239 14 124 31 879 Minnehaha Creek WD 36 351 10 796 40 415 36 649 51 509 Lake Mitchell 20 663 17 927 16 098 6 010 19 372 Rice Marsh Lake 28 715 14 769 30 463 19 708 36 225 Lake Riley 57 091 13 242 55 733 14 635 26 519 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek WD 448 348 70 377 398 837 91 889 112 755 Silver Lake 3 321 1 599 3 229 2 376 3 884 Lake Susan 99 893 48 567 93 074 33 502 75 251 TOTAL 786 066 204 637 728 471 254 446 401 488 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 24 D R AFT December 07 227 4 3 5 TP Loading The total predicted increase in TP loading from 1990 to 2020 was compared to removals by active BMPs in the City to assess compliance with nondegradation For all of the subwatersheds except Lake Ann and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek annual TP removals exceeded the estimated increase between 1990 and 2020 Table 4 7 T bl 47 Pr d t d TP I d b t 1990 d 2020 t BMP a e e IC e oa lDcreases e ween an lD comparIson 0 remova s Total TP TP Removal Net Increase 1990 2000 2000 2020 Removal or Watershed 1990 2020 Development Development Street Cleaning Net Increase ID Ibs yr Rules Ibs Rules Ibs Ibs Ibs Lake Ann 22 1 10 4 8 Chaska Creek 51 38 50 11 47 Lotus Lake 13 77 107 48 219 Lower MN River 55 22 67 20 54 Lake Lucy 160 66 149 33 87 Minnehaha Creek WD 119 43 122 85 131 Lake Mitchell 99 85 77 14 76 Rice Marsh Lake 95 171 168 46 291 Lake Riley 265 53 193 34 14 Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek WD 1 470 201 986 213 70 Silver Lake 11 14 14 6 22 Lake Susan 328 128 234 78 111 TOTAL 2 688 898 2 174 589 974 4 4 Model Sensitivity Because the model is not calibrated and is only used for comparison purposes it is useful to test the sensitivity of model to selected inputs especially as we compare model results to real world measured removals The first parameter that may affect the results of the model is the selection of the particle file The current modeling is based on the NURP50 file which represents the median concentrations from the NURP studies To assess the potential effects of underestimating runoff concentrations the Rice Marsh subwatershed was analyzed using both the median runoff concentrations NURP50 and 90th percentile runoff concentrations NURP90 Results of the 50th and 90th percentile runs are presented in Table 4 8 and Table 4 9 Even if the actual concentrations were more similar to 90tfi percentile concentrations for both TSS and TP the City of Chanhassen would be meeting the nondegradation requirement City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 25 DR AFT December 07 228 Table 4 8 Rice Marsh subwatershed TSS loading and removals for the 50th and 90th percentiles of the NURP studies Total TSS TSS Removal Net Increase Removal or Watershed 1990 2020 Development Street Net Increase ID Ibs vr Rules Ibs Cleaning lbs lbs Rice Marsh NURP 50 27 193 45 232 17 834 35 873 Rice Marsh NURP 90 81 577 114 250 17 834 50 507 Table 4 9 Rice Marsh subwatershed TP loading and removals for the 50th and 90th percentiles of the NURP studies Total TP TP Removal Net Increase Removal or Watershed 1990 2020 Development Street Net Increase ID lbs vr Rules lbs Cleaning lbs lbs Rice Marsh NURP 50 95 339 43 287 Rice Marsh NURP 90 202 702 43 543 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 26 DR AFT December 07 229 5 0 SUMMARY AND PROPOSED BMPS The City of Chanhassen in conjunction with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts has been actively managing water quality for many years These activities have included developing and enforcing rules to minimize water quality impacts from development building and maintaining BMPs throughout the city and actively sweeping city streets to remove as much material as possible from the impervious surfaces These activities have been very effective in the mitigation of increased TSS and TP loads from the watershed The increase in impervious surface between 1990 and 2000 has resulted in increased stormwater runoff volume and that volume is expected to continue to increase with further development Volume is difficult to remove from the watershed and it is unlikely that the City will be able to attain 1988 volume conditions However the effects of increased runoff volume can be minimized or mitigated through stream bank and shoreline stabilization programs infiltration and rate control Consequently the best approach to addressing volume is through aggressive abstraction and mitigation and opportunistic volume control 5 1 Special and Impaired Waters Bluff Creek was added to the State of Minnesota 303 d list of Impaired Waters in 2002 for excess turbidity and on 2004 based on its fish community index of biotic integrity score TMDLs have not yet been completed for those impairments Lotus Lake was added to the 303 d list in 2002 for excess nutrients and Lake Riley in 2002 for excess nutrients and mercury fish consumption Seminary Fen and Assumption Creek are Outstanding Resource Value Waters 5 2 Total Suspended Solids The combination of development rules and street sweeping has proved effective in reducing the volume of total suspended solids to a level well below that estimated to have been contributed in 1988 Most ofthat removal is a result of application of development rules and other regulations but almost one quarter is achieved through the aggressive street maintenance program Each subwatershed except Lake Ann meets the Nondegradation Total Suspended Solids requirement by removing more TSS through regulation and BMPs than the new load generated since 1988 see Table 4 6 It should be noted that if any future TMDLs for any water resource to which Chanhassen discharges requires additional TSS load reduction then the City may be required to remove additional TSS or TP load beyond simply meeting the Nondegradation TSS and TP requirement 5 2 1 Regulatory Program Development rules will continue to require land altering activities to provide at least NURP Ievel removal 80 of Total Suspended Solids prior to discharge In accordance with its NPDES City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 27 DR AFT December 07 230 permit the City annually inspects 20 percent of those detention ponds that are publicly owned to determine maintenance needs and evaluate whether they continue to perform at the level to which they were designed City ordinance requires owners of private stormwater facilities to perform regular maintenance and to operate those facilities so they continue to perform at the level to which they were designed Developer s Agreements specify required maintenance The City s Stormwater Management Plan designates Assumption Creek and Seminary Fen as Preserve classification water resources requiring a higher level of treatment for discharges to those waters including temperature controls 5 2 2 Street Sweeping This maintenance program removes not only smaller particles that contribute to Total Suspended Solids but also larger particles of inorganic and organic material that can contribute to downstream clarity and water quality issues as well as obstruct pipes create sediment deltas at outlets and aggrade in streams and impair biotic functions Street sweeping also improves traffic safety and general aesthetics by removing unsafe or unsightly materials from the streets The City will continue to sweep streets once per year in the spring to remove sand and salt residue from winter de icing plus any spring leaves and seeds and old organic material Other street sweeping is performed throughout the year as necessary Recent research in Wisconsin Bannerman 2007 indicates that the incremental water quality benefit of increased street sweeping is small unless the frequency of sweeping is very aggressive Street sweeping practices will be refined to improve the water quality and overall benefit of street sweeping 1 Spring street sweeping will be performed as early as possible to remove material from the street before the spring rains 2 Increased street sweeping frequency may be of benefit in sensitive locations such as in the Lake Ann subwatershed or where there is noticeable aggradation in streams or below outfalls or where a UAA or TMDL indicates that efforts should be maximized to remove pollutant loading The City will evaluate the potential benefits of more frequent street sweeping in sensitive areas 3 Timing of street sweeping will be evaluated to maximize its efficacy for example sweeping prior to hydrant flushing 5 2 3 Lake Ann Subwatershed The Lake Ann subwatershed is projected to generate 845 pounds more TSS in 2020 than was generated in 1990 This sub watershed is very small and has a low watershed to lake area ratio The lake also has good water quality and clarity There are several outfalls into Lake Ann The City will investigate the possibility of retrofitting those outfalls with sump manholes or other devices to collect sediment prior to discharge into the lake The City will also look for opportunities to reduce runoff by increasing abstraction in the subwatershed and evaluate land use policies governing development for opportunities to reduce the creation of new TSS City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 28 D R AFT December 07 231 5 2 4 Other Activities The volume management activities described in section 5 3 below such as increased infiltration biofiltration and runoff volume controls may further reduce TSS and TP loading by pre treating or reducing the amount of runoff volume conveying TSS and TP to waters 5 3 Total Phosphorus As with TSS the combination of development rules manhole cleanout and street sweeping has proved effective in reducing the volume of total phosphorus to a level below that estimated to have been contributed in 1988 Most of that removal is a result of application of development rules but almost 20 percent is achieved through the aggressive street maintenance program Each subwatershed meets the Nondegradation Total Phosphorus requirement by removing more TP through regulation and BMPs than the new load generated since 1988 see Table 4 7 It should be noted that if any future TMDLs for any water resource to which land in Chanhassen drains requires additional TP or TSS load reduction then the City may be required to remove additional TP or TSS load beyond simply meeting the Nondegradation TP and TSS requirement 5 3 1 Regulatory Program Development rules will continue to require land altering activities to provide at least NURP Ievel removal 60 of Total Phosphorus prior to discharge In accordance with its NPDES permit the City annually inspects 20 percent of those detention ponds that are publicly owned to determine maintenance needs and evaluate whether they continue to perform at the level to which they were designed City ordinance requires owners of private stormwater facilities to perform regular maintenance and to operate those facilities so they continue to perform at the level to which they were designed Developer s Agreements specify required maintenance The City s Stormwater Management Plan designates Assumption Creek and Seminary Fen as Preserve classification water resources requiring a higher level of treatment for discharges to those waters including temperature controls 5 3 2 Street Sweeping This maintenance program removes not only smaller particles that are a fraction of the TSS load but also larger particles of organic material that can contribute to downstream clarity and water quality issues Street sweeping also improves traffic safety and general aesthetics by removing unsafe or unsightly materials from the streets and reduces the amount of material on the street that can clog catch basin covers and limit street drainage The City will continue to sweep streets once per year in the spring to remove sand and salt residue from winter de icing plus any spring leaves and seeds and old organic material Other street sweeping is performed throughout the year as necessary Recent research in Wisconsin Bannerman 2007 indicates that the incremental water quality benefit of increased street sweeping is small unless the frequency of sweeping is very aggressive City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 29 D R AFT December 07 232 Street sweeping practices will be refined to improve the water quality and overall benefit of street sweeping 1 Spring street sweeping will be performed as early as possible to remove material from the street before the spring rains 2 Increased street sweeping frequency may be of benefit in sensitive locations where there is noticeable aggradation in streams or below outfalls or where a UAA or TMDL indicates that efforts should be maximized to remove pollutant loading The City will evaluate the potential benefits of more frequent street sweeping in sensitive areas 3 Timing of street sweeping will be evaluated to maximize its efficacy for example sweeping prior to hydrant flushing 5 3 3 Lake Ann and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Subwatersheds The Lake Ann subwatershed is projected to generate 8 pounds more TP in 2020 than was generated in 1990 with 70 additional pounds TP estimated in the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek subwatershed The Lake Ann subwatershed is very small and has a low watershed to lake area ratio The lake also has good water quality and clarity There are several outfalls into Lake Ann Reduction in TSS loading from those outfalls as described above will also reduce phosphorus loading The City will investigate the possibility of retrofitting those outfalls with sump manholes or other devices to collect sediment prior to discharge into the lake The City will also look for opportunities to reduce runoff by increasing abstraction in the subwatershed and evaluate land use policies governing development for opportunities to reduce the creation of new TP The Riley Purgatory BluffCreek subwatershed encompasses about one third of the city s area Impervious cover is expected to double between 2000 and 2020 A significant portion of this subwatershed falls within the City s Bluff Creek Overlay District described in Section 3 1 1 above This ordinance contains a number of zoning and planning tools that will be applied to development and redevelopment in this overlay district as part of the City s overall policy to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor and its wetlands bluffs wooded areas and water resources If the regulatory program is not successful in limiting new TP the City will incorporate TP reduction BMPs into City projects as opportunities arise 5 3 4 Other Activities The volume management activities described in section 5 3 below such as increased infiltration biofiltration and runoff volume controls may further reduce TP and TSS loading by pre treating or reducing the amount of runoff volume conveying TP and TSS to waters 5 4 Volume This report estimates that stormwater volume in the city will increase by about 50 percent between 1990 and 2020 with most of that volume increase occurring between 2000 and 2020 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 30 DR AFT December 07 233 Each subwatershed with the exception of Silver Lake and Lotus Lake significantly exceeds the Nondegradation Volume Management requirement Where new volume is expected to be generated as a result of future development or redevelopment the regulatory program can be a means to achieve some level of volume management Best Management Practices in already developed areas will likely be confined to small volume management practices retrofitted where opportunities arise and mitigation of water quality related impacts of volume such as streambank stabilization The City s water resources and environmental education programs can also provide information to residential and other property owners on small scale volume management practices for individual properties 5 4 1 Regulatory Program Abstraction Infiltration Neither the City nor the three watershed districts with land in the city require the infiltration or abstraction of stormwater runoff although that concept is being discussed as a potential rule change in Minnehaha Creek Abstraction is the removal of stormwater from runoff and can include BMPs such as infiltration evapotranspiration pervious pavement and capture and reuse Most of the annual volume of stormwater runoff is generated by small rain events so abstraction and infiltration of small events can significantly reduce the amount of annual runoff volume Precipitation frequency curves derived from precipitation records at the Minneapolis St Paul International Airport can be used to estimate the percent of total annual volume that could be captured through infiltration see Figure 5 1 About 85 percent of annual stormwater volume is generated from the first one inch of rainfall storm events of up to one inch plus the first inch of events greater than one inch A rule requiring abstraction of the first one inch of rainfall could theoretically reduce new runoff volume by 85 percent About 80 percent of annual volume is generated from the first three quarters inch and 65 percent from the first one half inch of rainfall Evaluation of Stormwater Infiltration Rules Determined from MSP Precipitation Frequency Curves 1 00 k r v L 7 A 0 5 65 I If 0 75 80 I 1 0 85 jf v c L 0 0 75 c c a 0 g 0 50 cO s 0 25 J ns L1 a 0 00 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 Infiltration Storm Depth Rule in 2 5 3 0 Figure 5 1 Annual stormwater volume that could be captured through abstraction infiltration Wenck Associates Inc derived from MPCA Minnesota Stormwater Manual Appendix B City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessn1ent 31 D R AFT December 07 234 A secondary but important benefit of abstraction is that volume is no longer being contributed to runoff and is not picking up and transporting pollutants to downstream waters Research conducted by Prof Robert Pitt Pitt 1998 in the City of Milwaukee suggests that 25 percent of the annual total phosphorus load is conveyed in the first one half inch of rainfall and 15 percent of the annual TSS load For the first inch of rainfall that load is 65 percent of annual TP and 50 percent of annual TSS In the Twin Cities 90 percent of all rainfall events are one inch or less The most common form of abstraction is infiltration A growing number of watershed management organizations are enacting infiltration rules with one half inch infiltration from new impervious surface common The Ramsey Washington County Watershed District and Capitol Region Watershed Districts recently enacted a one inch from new impervious surface rule and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is considering one inch as well Adopting an abstraction requirement will reduce the new volume of runoff from developing and redeveloping areas Chanhassen soils are mapped as generally being of soil hydrologic group B These soils readily infiltrate However do to the highly urbanized land use throughout much of Chanhassen actual infiltration rates may be diminished from those anticipated for the mapped soil unit There are pockets of less permeable C and D soils Most development and redevelopment should be able to successfully incorporate infiltration An abstraction requirement for new development will only address new volume predicted to occur between its promulgation and 2020 about 1 950 acre feet However in the very long term as existing development redevelops the new volume generated between 1990 and 2000 and prior will slowly be mitigated as redevelopment and reconstruction occurs The projected new storm water volume between 2000 and 2020 is 1 950 acre feet A one half inch abstraction requirement might reduce new stormwater volume by an estimated 65 percent or 1 270 acre feet leaving an estimated net new stormwater volume of 680 acre feet The City will work with the Watershed Districts to review and consider adopting a volume management requirement for new development and redevelopment Soil Management Plan requirement An assumption in calculating stormwater volume to be captured from an abstraction requirement is that the part of the site that is pervious and infiltrating stormwater pre construction will be as pervious and infiltrate at least as much stormwater volume post construction In reality construction activities such as mass grading road and utility construction and structure construction lead to soil compaction and loss of permeability To maximize the effectiveness of an infiltration requirement the City will consider revising its ordinances to require developers to submit a Soil Management Plan that details how the developer plans to 1 minimize soil compaction from construction activities 2 phase construction activities to minimize exposed soils and 3 restore site permeability through actions such as post construction soil ripping or soil amendment City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 32 D R AFT December 07 235 Encourage Low Impact Development LID Low Impact Development LID Integrated Management Practices IMP and Better Site Design principles and practices encourage developers to consider stormwater impacts of new development early in the planning process The City s zoning code includes provisions for Planned Unit Developments that may vary from strict application of zoning requirements to make it easier to tailor a development to the terrain and minimize stormwater impacts such as new volume The City will review its zoning code and Planned Unit Development process to evaluate existing zoning or development incentives to encourage developers to creatively apply LID IMP and better site design principles to minimize new stormwater volumes and pollutant loading and to consider revisions to its zoning code and PUD process 5 4 2 Education Program The City has in place an education and outreach program to provide information to various audiences on a wide variety of stormwater management and water quality issues This program will target both residential property owners and commercial property owners on ways to incorporate small infiltration practices on their property Small scale practices such as rain gardens conversion of turf to native vegetation pond and wetland buffers installation of rain barrels and cisterns and use of pervious pavement and pavers can add up to significant water quality and stormwater reductions when broadly applied The City will utilize its currently existing educational programming as well as explore cooperative opportunities with outside agencies and will also develop targeted information for developers on incorporating Low Impact Development principles and water quality and volume management into development and redevelopment 5 4 3 Structural Improvements Structural BMPs to manage storm water volume will be constructed as stand alone projects or incorporated into other projects such as street reconstruction as opportunities arise These BMPs store and infiltrate or evapotranspirate storm water at the street block or neighborhood scale The cost per acre foot for these types of BMPs can be significant as stand alone projects but may be more cost effective when combined with other improvements such as a neighborhood street reconstruction project These types of BMPs also will have the benefit of further reducing pollutant loading Where it is difficult or too costly to significantly reduce new stormwater volume downstream water resources will be protected from adverse effects through restoration and stabilization projects Infiltration basins An infiltration basin is a shallow vegetated basin designed to hold and infiltrate stormwater Some evapotranspiration also occurs Infiltration basins also have an ongoing significant maintenance cost Over time sediment discharged into the basins accumulates and reduces the infiltration capacity This sediment must be removed periodically and permeability restored through soil ripping soil amendment etc City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 33 D R AFT December 07 236 Constructed wetlands Constructed wetlands can decrease stormwater volume through evapotranspiration from wetland vegetation as well as evaporation from open water stored in the wetland Underground infiltration New technologies are available to construct infiltration devices under large paved areas such as parking lots or streets Integrated Management Practices IMP and Better site Design principles and practices There is an ongoing annual cost to remove and dispose of accumulated material from the device Streambank stabilization The new volume of storm water generated through land use change is conveyed through the system of lakes wetlands and small channels into the major streams that drain the City Bluff Creek and Riley Creek and to a lesser extent Assumption Creek This additional volume increases peak flow rates and elevations in the streams and has the potential to destabilize and erode streambanks The increased peak flows and streambank erosion also may stress biological communities in the streams These adverse impacts can be mitigated by strengthening streambanks and restoring areas of existing erosion as well as considering structural amendments to the stream channel such as rock vanes Habitat lost to past impacts can be mitigated with this restoration by re vegetating streambanks adding step pools and enhancing substrate The City and the watershed districts have performed general inventories of the major streams to identify areas of existing erosion The City is currently taking steps to stabilize a number of the identified erosion areas and will continue to work in partnership with the watershed districts to undertake a program of stream restoration These projects would range from simple spot repairs of streambanks to potential total restoration of the stream These projects will combine both stabilization and habitat enhancement 5 4 4 Nonstructural Improvements Reforestation Urban trees are an integral part of the storm water management system Trees intercept rain and snow fall storing event volume for later evaporation Trees also use surface storage for transpiration removing additional storm water volume from the stormwater system Trees have other benefits as well Trees increase property values provide habitat take in C02 and release oxygen enhance neighborhood aesthetics and decrease home heating and cooling costs The City recognizes this value by requiring by ordinance replacement of trees lost to construction or land alteration Numerous studies have been conducted estimating the volume ofrainfall that trees intercept for example Xiong et al 2000 McPherson 2005 This annual volume is dependant on the type and species of tree and whether the tree is isolated such as an urban street tree or part of a forest canopy For example evergreen trees can intercept and store more stormwater than deciduous trees because their narrow leaves provide a greater leaf surface area The volume also depends on the intensity of the storm with less intense events resulting in more interception On average however literature suggests that an isolated deciduous tree can intercept approximately 25 percent of the annual volume of rainfall that falls upon it Combined with the daily water use for City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 34 DR AFT December 07 237 transpiration Wullschleger 1998 it is estimated that a single deciduous tree can evapotranspirate 2 000 3 000 gallons of stormwater per year A coniferous tree can evapotranspirate an even greater amount It is estimated that about 10 000 trees could evapotranspirate about 100 acre feet of stormwater volume The City will evaluate its existing reforestation program and current preservation practices to reduce the amount of rainfall that runs off the landscape WetlandlUpland Restoration The City has restored dozens of acres of wetlands and will continue to look for additional opportunities to restore wetland areas and the associated upland Wetland vegetation is very efficient at transpiring significant volumes of water reducing the overall volume discharged to water resources downstream Native vegetation planted in restored uplands can increase the infiltration capacity of poorer soils by increasing organic matter in the soil and by creating long root channels to convey water deep into the soil City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 35 DR AFT December 07 238 6 0 SWPPP MODIFICATIONS The following are the proposed modifications to the City of Chanhassen SWPPP to address the findings of this analysis 6 1 Total Suspended Solids The City currently meets the Total Suspended Solids requirement Modifications to the SWPPP are confined to some refinement of the BMPs for those activities that reduce TSS throughout the City and specifically in the Lake Ann subwatershed 6 1 1 Regulatory Program Development rules will continue to require land altering activities to provide at least NURP Ievel removal 80 of Total Suspended Solids prior to discharge The City s Surface Water Management ordinance specifies design criteria including NURP Ievel removals BMP 5b l Regulatory Mechanism to Address Post Construction Runoff from New Development and Redevelopment provides for review and update of ordinances to ensure they are adequate and consistent with storm water management plan requirements No additional update is necessary 6 1 2 Street Sweeping Increased street sweeping frequency may be of benefit in sensitive locations where there is noticeable aggradation in streams or below outfalls or where a UAA or TMDL indicates that efforts should be maximized to remove pollutant loading BMP 6a 2 Street Sweeping will be revised to add an evaluation of locations where additional street sweeping would be most effective Based on that evaluation the City may perform additional sweeping in those sensitive areas 6 1 3 Lake Ann Subwatershed BMP 5a l will be revised to include an evaluation of land use policies for the Lake Ann watershed that would minimize increase in TSS and also complement the Comprehensive Land Use plan promoting the dedication of park land and preservation of buffers and open space within the watershed Such policies may include park expansion increased setbacks or buffers tiered density promotion of cluster housing or restrictions on the amount of land in anyone phase of construction The City will continue to actively manage the forested area within Lake Ann Park to maximize canopy cover as well as look for additional opportunities in Lake Ann Park for abstraction City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 36 DR AFT December 07 239 Opportunities for additional stormwater treatment abstraction and infiltration will be identified within the Lake Ann watershed and the City will work with adjacent property owners to facilitate these opportunities 6 1 4 Other Activities The volume management activities described in section 5 3 above such as increased infiltration biofiltration and runoff volume controls may further reduce TSS loading by pre treating or reducing the amount of runoff volume conveying TSS to waters BMP 5a l Development and Implementation of Structural and or Non structural BMPs will be amended to incorporate these practices into city construction projects 6 2 Total Phosphorus The City currently meets the Total Phosphorus requirement Modifications to the SWPPP are confined to some refinement of the BMPs for those activities that reduce TP throughout the City and specifically in the Lake Ann and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek subwatersheds 6 2 1 Regulatory Program Development rules will continue to require land altering activities to provide at least NURP level removal 60 of Total Phosphorus prior to discharge The City s Surface Water Management ordinance specifies design criteria including NURP level removals BMP 5b l Regulatory Mechanism to Address Post Construction Runoff from New Development and Redevelopment provides for review and update of ordinances to ensure they are adequate and consistent with storm water management plan requirements No additional update is necessary 6 2 2 Street Sweeping Increased street sweeping frequency may be of benefit in sensitive locations where there is noticeable aggradation in streams or below outfalls or where a UAA or TMDL indicates that efforts should be maximized to remove pollutant loading BMP 6a 2 Street Sweeping will be revised to add an evaluation of locations where additional street sweeping would be most effective Based on that evaluation the City may perform additional sweeping in those sensitive areas The City will also review the coordination and timing of street sweeping activities with other City management activities to maximize efficacy of sweepings 6 2 3 Lake Ann and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Subwatersheds The BMPS identified in Section 6 1 3 above would also reduce TP load to Lake Ann A significant portion of this subwatershed falls within the City s Bluff Creek Overlay District described in Section 3 1 1 above This ordinance contains a number of zoning and planning tools that will be applied to development and redevelopment in this overlay district as part of the City s overall policy to protect the Bluff Creek Corridor and its wetlands bluffs wooded areas and water resources BMP 5b l Regulatory Mechanism to Address Post Construction Runoff from New Development and Redevelopment will be revised to provide for a review of the City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 37 DR AFT December 07 240 Overlay District ordinance to determine whether revisions are necessary to provide additional protection 6 2 4 Other Activities The volume management activities described in section 5 3 above such as increased infiltration biofiltration and runoff volume controls may further reduce TP loading by pre treating or reducing the amount of runoff volume conveying TP to waters BMP 5a l Development and Implementation of Structural and or Non structural BMPs will be amended to incorporate these practices into city construction projects 6 3 Volume The City will work cooperatively with the three watershed districts with land in the city to coordinate regulatory volume management BMPs with watershed district rules 6 3 1 Regulatory Program Abstraction requirement BMP 5b l Regulatory Mechanism to Address Post Construction Runoff from New Development and Redevelopment will be revised to provide for review and amendment of local controls and the local water management plan to evaluate and implement an abstraction infiltration requirement for new development and redevelopment that is consistent with watershed district requirements Soil Management Plan requirement BMP 5b l Regulatory Mechanism to Address Post Construction Runoff from New Development and Redevelopment will be revised to provide for review and amendment of local controls and the local water management plan to evaluate and implement a soil management plan requirement for new development and redevelopment Evaluate regulatory means to encourage Better Site Design BMP 5b l Regulatory Mechanism to Address Post Construction Runoff from New Development and Redevelopment will be revised to provide for a review of City Ordinances and procedures to identify means such as zoning or development incentives to encourage developers to incorporate Low Impact Development LID Integrated Management Practices IMP or Better Site Design principles to minimize new stormwater volumes and pollutant loading 6 3 2 Education Program The City undertakes an education and outreach program to providing education to various audiences on a wide variety of stormwater management and water quality issues These are described in various BMPs implementing Minimum Measure 1 Public Education and Outreach These BMPs adequately generally describe the education and outreach program Specific topics to be covered in these activities vary from year to year The annual list of topics will include information on small practices for water quality and volume management such as rain gardens conversion of turf to native vegetation installation of rain barrels and cisterns and use of pervious pavement and pavers Topics will also include developer education regarding City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 38 DR AFT December 07 241 storm water management Other educational and outreach activities will include continuation of the existing Arbor Day tree sale and promotion of the Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District s seedling pack purchase program Current methods to communicate with the public will be evaluated and revised as necessary 6 3 3 Structural Improvements Structural Projects Structural BMPs will be constructed as stand alone projects or incorporated into other projects such as street reconstruction as opportunities arise The highest need is for the reduction of new stormwater volume generated since 1988 Most structural volume management improvements are not cost effective as stand alone projects but may be more cost effective if they can be incorporated into other projects such as street reconstruction BMP 5a l Development and Implementation of Structural and or Non structural BMPs will be revised to incorporate pollutant loading and volume management BMPs on city projects Mitigation Projects Where it is difficult to significantly reduce new storm water volume downstream water resources can be protected from adverse effects through restoration and stabilization projects BMP 5a l Development and Implementation of Structural and or Non structural BMPs will be revised to incorporate development of a stream and shoreline restoration program to mitigate past erosion enhance habitat and prevent future erosion The City will continue identifying eroded gullies escarpment and wash areas and begin to cooperatively mitigate these areas whenever possible with the Watershed Districts This program may include city or watershed district projects and assistance to property owners in completing such projects 6 3 4 Nonstructural Improvements Reforestation BMP 5a l Development and Implementation of Structural and or Non structural BMPs will be revised to include a goal to provide opportunities for resident to purchase or plant trees for increased storm water abstraction based upon the existing spring tree sale held annually by the City and the tree coupon program the City currently operates The City will continue its policy of preserving existing woodland areas where opportunities arise through density transfer conservation easements park dedication and other planning tools BMP 5b l Regulatory Mechanism to Address Post Construction Runoff from New Development and Redevelopment describes the ordinance review process the City will undertake to determine if its regulatory program is adequate to effectively prevent or reduce nonpoint source pollution As part of that review process the City will review its existing Landscaping and Tree Preservation Requirements and revise if necessary to promote tree preservation and reforestation WetlandlUpland Restoration BMP 5a l Development and Implementation of Structural and or Non structural BMPs will be revised to note that the city will continue to look for opportunities to undertake wetland and upland restorations as volume management BMPs that are part of an overall volume management program City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 39 DR AFT December 07 242 References Bannerman R T et al 1993 Sources of pollutants in Wisconsin storm water Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Water Science and Technology 28 3 5 241 259 Bannerman R T 2007 Reducing the uncertainty in the calculations of street cleaner performance for Wisconsin municipalities Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Unpublished research Frelich Lee E 1992 Predicting dimensional relationships for Twin Cities shade trees St Paul MN University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources McPherson G et al 2005 Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities Journal of Forestry December 2005 411 416 Minnesota Department of Transportation 2005 The cost and effectiveness of stormwater management practices Report No MNIRC 2005 23 St Paul MN MnDOT Research Services Section Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2000 Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas St Paul MN http www pca state mn us water oubs sw bmomanual html Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2006 Minnesota Stormwater Manual St Paul MN http www pca state mn us water stormwater stormwater manual html Obermeyer B Riley Purgatory Creek Bluff Creek and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District engineer Pers corresp 6 8 06 7 12 06 Pitt Robert E April 29 30 1998 Course notes presented at the workshop Storm Water Quality Management through the Use of Detention Basins Earl Brown Continuing Education Center Univ of Minnesota St Paul Minn Pitt R J Lantrip and R Harrison 1999 Infiltration through disturbed urban soils and compost amended soil effects on runoff quality and quantity Report No EPAl6001 R 001016 US EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory Cincinnati OH USEPA 1999 Preliminary data summary of urban storm water best management practices Report No EPA 821 R 99 012 Wullschleger S D F e Meinzer and R A Vertessy 1998 A review of whole plant water use studies in trees Tree Physiology 18 499 512 Xiao Q et al 2000 Winter rainfall interception by two mature open grown trees in Davis California Hydrological Processes 14 763 784 Xiao Q et al 2000 A new approach to modeling tree rainfall interception Journal of Geophysical Research 105 D23 29 173 29 188 City of Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment 40 DR AFT December 07 243 jAd Metropolitan Council A l f1 December26 2007 Environmental Services Mr Terry Jeffery Water Resources Coordinator City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen MN 55317 CITY OF CHANHASSEN fRl g G n W fD DEe 3 1 2007 RE Chanhassen Draft Nondegradation Plan ENGINEERiNG DEPT Dear Mr Jeffery Metropolitan Council staff has reviewed the draft Nondegradation Assessment plan prepared for the city as part of its MS4 NPDES permit requirements Council staff has found the plan to be consistent with the Council s Water Resources Management Policy Plan The above plan indicates that the amount of suspended solids and phosphorus will be reduced between 1990 and 2020 However the total runoff volume will increase by over 50 percent fiom 1990 conditions The plan outlines several strategies which the city will consider to reduce the runoff volume between current conditions and 2020 However the plan does not detail a clear action plan for achieving reductions in stom1 water volume There are a number of impaired waters in the city which are being degraded because of increased sto11n water runoff It is critical that a clearly defined action plan be proposed on how the city will reduce storm water volume so these impaired water bodies can be improved Requiring abstraction infiltration for development and redevelopment as well as a soil management plan and promoting low impact development will all lead toward improved waters by reducing runoff volume but it takes a strong regulatory conunitment from the city to bring this to fruition Thank you for the opportunity to review the city s nondegradation plan If you have any questions about the comments please contact Jack Frost of my office at 651 602 1078 sincere7 Keith Buttleman Assistant General Manager Environmental Quality Assurance Department KB jf cc Diane Spector Wenck and Associates Jim Dttley Metropolitan Council Sector Represelitative www metrocouncil org 390 Robert Street North St Paul MN 55101 1805 651 602 1005 Fax 651 602 1477 TI Y 651 291 0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer 244 Page 1 of 1 Jeffery Terry From Aanenson Kate Sent Monday January 14 2008 3 56 PM To Jeffery Terry Subject FW Chanhassen Lakes assessment From Sstrohma@aol com mailto Sstrohma@aol com Sent Monday January 14 20084 01 PM To City Council Aanenson Kate Subject Chanhassen Lakes assessment To City of Chanhassen Planning commission and City Council I am a resident of Chanhassen concerned about the qualtiy of Lotus Lake The non degradation assessment the city has developed appears to be an excellent well developed document I appreciate the work that has gone into it I support the recommendations to have the city adopt the more advanced storm water management practices mentioned in the document on page 2 of the executive summary and section 5 4 1 The report also points out that Lotus Lake will meet the 1988 guideline due to the fact that the Lake was fully developed in 1988 and thus will not get much attention due to this assessment I d like to point out however that Lotus Lake is still on the impaired waters list and needs to be improved well beyond 1988 standards Therefore I want to strongly recommend that you support the Lotus Lake improvement project that the Watershed is proposing as part of the its 10 year plan This plan implements the more advanced storm water management practices by reducing volume and improving the quality and can be used a stepping stone for the rest of the city s lakes and streams Thank you for your consideration of this issue Sincerely Shelley Stroh maier Strohmaier Consumer Insights 80 Sandy Hook Road Chanhassen MN 55317 Phone 952 949 1143 Fax 952 949 1157 sstrohma@aol com Start the year off right Easy ways to stay in shape in the new year 1 15 2008 245 Page 1 of 1 Jeffery Terry From Aanenson Kate Sent Tuesday January 15 2008 7 54 AM To Jeffery Terry Subject FW Lotus Lake From Dave Susla mailto Dave Susla@palmcoveofbradenton com Sent Monday January 14 2008 5 22 PM To City Council Aanenson Kate Subject Lotus Lake Hi my name is Dave Susla I am the recently elected President of the Lotus Lake Homeowners Association I am writing to you out of concern for Lotus Lake as it relates to the recent studies on the non degradation assessments While the assessment the city has developed appears to be an excellent document and I appreciate the fine work that has gone into it I am concerned that it does not go far enough to protect and preserve Lotus Lake and more importantly ultimately get Lotus Lake removed from the impaired waters list strongly support the recommendations to have the city adopt the more advanced storm water management practices mentioned in the document on page 2 of the executive summary and section 5 4 1 While it is fairly evident that Lotus Lake will meet the 1988 guideline it is mainly due to the fact that Lotus Lake was fully developed in 1988 So the bar was set pretty low with regards to improvement as the majority of the damage from development was already present in 1988 The bottom line is that Lotus Lake will receive very little benefit by meeting the 1988 guideline Given this fact and the fact that Lotus Lake is still on the impaired waters list it needs to be improved well beyond 1988 standards While there has been no formal homeowner vote on this subject I can tell you from personal conversations with many lakeshore owners water quality is a primary and growing concern on the lake As a group I can assure you that we are very interested in seeing you support the Lotus Lake improvement project that the Watershed is proposing as part of the watershed s 10 year plan As I am sure you know the plan will implement more advanced Storm water management practices than are currently being proposed The ultimate goal of the watershed s program is to get Lotus Lake off of the impaired waters list I want to thank you in advance for taking the time to read this note and ultimately for your support Regards Dave Susla 1 15 2008 246 Page 1 of 1 Jeffery Terry From Aanenson Kate Sent Tuesday January 15 2008 7 55 AM To Jeffery Terry Subject FW Non Degradation Assessment From Joe Pfankuch mailto j pfankuch@mchsi com Sent Monday January 14 2008 6 23 PM To City Council Aanenson Kate Subject Non Degradation Assessment Dear City of Chanhassen Planning commission and City Council As a Lotus Lake resident and Chanhassen citizen since 1991 and I m very proud of our lake and we feel privileged to have this type of resource But I m embarrassed that some Chanhassen residents still won t swim in Lotus Lake due to the pollution My family is very interested in improving the impaired status of our lake and we have taken a proactive effort Picking up garbage on the lake during ice fishing season Helping to educate neighbors to become good stewards Cleaning the streets from harmful items which could wash into the lake Communicating DNR and City water preservation ideas to the lake s watershed area Etc It appears the non degradation assessment the city has developed is a commendable document with sound results It shows that Lotus Lake has passed this assessment when related to 1988 guidelines At first glance one would think that this is good and it s certainly not bad But the lake was fully developed and fairly polluted in 1988 and so even meeting these guidelines we are still impaired To this end going back to a previously unacceptable standard just doesn t make sense I don t think Cleveland wants to go back to 1969 when the Cuyahoga River was on fire It s the same scenario Although I appreciate the hard work put into the assessment we need to and can do better by comparing ourselves against excellence not mediocrity Our Schools don t aim for mediocrity and I wouldn t think we d want our natural resources to be satisfied with it either We need to strive for better than this And we have a great opportunity to do so with a huge groundswell of support Therefore I am strongly in favor of the recommendations to have the city adopt the more advanced storm water management practices mentioned in the document on page 2 of the executive summary and section 5 4 1 Furthermore I want to strongly recommend that you support the Lotus Lake improvement project that the Watershed is proposing as part of the watersheds 10 year plan This plan basically implements the more advanced Storm water management practices by reducing volume and improving the quality and can be used a stepping stone for the rest of the city s lakes and streams Thank you for your considerations I look forward to doing more than my share to help clean up one of our best resources Regards Joe Pfankuch 1 15 2008 247 Jeffery Terry From Sent To Subject Aanenson Kate Tuesday January 15 2008 11 42 AM Jeffery Terry FW Non Degradation Meeting Tonight Original Message From corpmech@netzero net mailto corpmech@netzero net Sent Tuesday January 15 2008 11 34 AM To Aanenson Kate Subject Non Degradation Meeting Tonight Kate The non degradation assessment the city has developed appears to be an excellent document well developed and with sound results I appreciate the fine work that has gone into it I am writing to support the recommendations to have the city adopt the more advanced storm water management practices mentioned in the document on page 2 of the executive summary and section 5 4 1 I commend Paul Oehme Terry Jeffery for their recent combined efforts with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Watershed They have both been very open minded have offered many out of the box suggestions that will benefit the environment while meeting the growing needs of Chanhassen Paul Terry are currently working together with the RPBC watershed engineer on the Meadow Green Wetland project in the Carver Beach area to maximize the end result of clean water leaving the pond as well as taking advantage of possibly 800 000 of watershed funding to meet common goals By partnering on projects with common goals the resolutions will take both perspectives into consideration our city tax dollars will go farther It is imperative that we make funds available to focus on implementing redevelopment standards of infiltration for retrofitting volume management where opportunities arise on city street reconstruction projects throughout all of Chanhassen These projects will reduce erosion while Improving water quality for all of our lakes streams Lotus Lake was already a fully developed residential lake in 1988i the phosphorous suspended solid statistics were already at a level beyond it s classification of a recreational lakei which is defined as fishable swimable Regardless of the fact that Lotus scathes by on the non degradation report required by the city being the same as 1988 i the volume of surface water run off is extremely high and we are recognized as an impaired water with the State since 2003 Accepting 1988 post development levels of phosphorous pollutants for this particular lake would be less than mediocrity Lotus being added to the MN303D impaired list dictated that tax payers conduct an 80 000 Use Attainability Analysis UAA The UAA was completed by Barr Engineering in 2005 This comprehensive study analyzes the phosphorous nitrate suspended solid loading and invasive plant specie issues and their many sources Barr s report addresses exact steps that need to be taken including 4 years of herbicide treatment to kill the excessive mil foil and curly leaf pond weed that was enabled by high phosphorous levels Alum treatment during years 5 7 to prevent the phosphorous already on the bottom of the lake from recirculating throughout the lake Years 8 10 continual monitoring and possible reapplication of herbicide or alum We also need to terminate the purple loosestrife by introducing Galerualla Beetles supplied by the DNR In addition to Barr s recommendations the watershed s proposed ten year plan would implement more advanced storm water management practices by reducing volume and improving the quality The only way the proposed ten year plan will PERMANENTLY improve the lake is by PERMANENTLY reducing volume phosphorous entering the lake This is true of all Chanhassen lakes streams 248 Since the report was released in 2005 some holding ponds have been modified cleaned out None of the many recommendations by Barr Engineering have taken place and unfortunately there has not been any measurable improvements to water quality So to consider Lotus Lake with two city parks public swimming beaches a fishing dock up to par is a huge misconception Three dedicated members or our Lotus Lake Clean Water Organization LLCWO Steve Donen Scott Maeyaert myself have been working with the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Water Shed District since May of 2007 to implement the 10 year plan recommended by Barr Engineering By working with local watersheds the city will have a better opportunity to develop plans that work defray costs from city funds This plan would reduce volume and improve quality of the storm water run off We strongly encourage the support of city managers and Council to encourage the watershed to proceed with the proposed ten year RPBC plan Thank you for your considerations Sincerely Mary Borns 7199 Frontier Trail Beauty Product Reviews Read unbiased beauty product reviews and join our product review team http thirdpartyoffers netzero net TGL2221 fc JKFkuJkEB6rxyQH339M6Ur6wvu8Dr09cDXEJTns65zb KSfp28sgRmN 2 249 Jeffery Terry From Sent To Subject Aanenson Kate Tuesday January 15 2008 2 56 PM Jeffery Terry FW non degradation assesment Original Message From Scott P Maeyaert mailto scott p maeyaert@ampf com Sent Tuesday January 15 2008 1 43 PM To City Council Aanenson Kate Subject non degradation assesment The non degradation assessment the city has developed appears to be an excellent document well developed and with sound results I appreciate the fine work that has gone into it I am taking this time to write this note to support the recommendations to have the city adopt the more advanced storm water management practices mentioned in the document on page 2 of the executive summary and section 5 4 1 Also it points out that Lotus Lake will meet the 1988 guideline due to the fact that Lotus Lake was fully developed in 1988 and thus will not get much attention due to this assessment I want to remind you that Lotus Lake is still on the impaired waters list and needs to be improved well beyond 1988 standards for this reason I want to strongly recommend that you support the Lotus Lake improvement project that the Watershed is proposing as part of the watersheds 10 year plan This plan basically implements the more advanced Storm water management practices by reducing volume and improving the quality and can be used a stepping stone for the rest of the city s lakes and streams Thank you for your considerations Scott P Maeyaert CFP@ Senior Financial Advisor An Ameriprise Platinum Financial ServicesSM practice Ameriprise Financial Services Inc 7601 France Ave South Suite 550 Edina MN 55435 5970 Office 952 857 1280 I Fax 952 831 0974 scott p maeyaert@ampf com ameriprise com We shape financial solutions for a lifetime@ Ameriprise Financial Services Inc offers financial advisory services investments insurance and annuity products RiverSource@ products are offered by affiliates of Ameriprise Financial Services Inc Member FINRA and SIPC This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information If you are not the intended recipient any disclosure copying use or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited If you have received this communication in error please notify us by reply e mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments Thank you 1 250 Page 1 of 1 Jeffery Terry From Aanenson Kate Sent Tuesday January 15 2008 4 35 PM To Jeffery Terry Subject FW Chanhassen Non degradation Plan Lotus Lake needs more help From Greg Fletcher mailto fletch 55317@yahoo com Sent Tuesday January 15 2008 4 38 PM To City Council Aanenson Kate Subject Chanhassen Non degradation Plan Lotus Lake needs more help Subject RE Chanhassen Non Degradation Plan Lotus Lake needs more help I think the City is moving in the right direction and support the general Non Degradation Plans But additional attention needs to be given to the water quality of Lotus Lake It is classified as impaired and would have been classified as impaired in 1988 the targeted levels of improvement I recommend the the Council and City staff work with the Riley Purgagory Bluff Creek Watershed District and other concerned organizations Lotus Lake Clean Water Organization Lotus Lake Homeowners Association to implement Best Practice Water Management strategies to improve the water quality in Lotus Lake We need to Reduce the run off volume entering Lotus Lake Reduce Total Disolved Solids entering the Lake Study in flow and out flow to determine ways of better managing bounce after rains Reduce Phosphorus levels entering the Lake Treat the phosphorus existing within the Lake Manage invasive and destructive Carp Thank you Greg Fletcher 7616 S Shore Drive Chanhassen MN 55317 612 710 9481 c Looking for last minute shopping deals Find them fast with Yahoo Search 1 15 2008 251 Memorandum To Terry Schwalbe Project Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment Date 1 8 2008 From Dan Murphy Client LMRWD Re LMRWD Review File No 1460 08 000 Remarks Per your request we have reviewed the December 2007 Chanhassen Nondegradation Assessment Draft on behalf of the LMRWD The non structural BMPs regulatory and educational programs and structural BMPs listed by the Assessment as measures to reduce citywide stormwater runoff volume and pollution meet the goals policies and criteria of the District as described in the 1999 LMRWD Water Management Plan WMP Detailed comments follow below The Assessment has determined that volumes of Total Suspended Solids TSS and Total Phosphorus TP generated city wide have been reduced to a level below that estimated to have been contributed in 1990 Sections 5 2 5 3 However increases in TSS and TP from 1990 to 2020 are projected to occur at a smaller scale for the Lake Ann and Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek subwatersheds The Lake Ann subwatershed is projected to generate 845 pounds more TSS in 2020 than was generated in 1990 Section 5 2 3 In addition the Lake Ann subwatershed is projected to generate 8 pounds more TP in 2020 than was generated in 1990 with 70 additional pounds TP estimated in the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek Subwatershed Section 5 3 3 1 The measures listed below are included in the Assessment as sources of the past citywide TSS and TP reductions These measures will continue to be implemented by the City in the future a Sections 5 2 1 and 5 3 1 of the Nondegradation Assessment state that the City has and will continue to apply development rules which require that land altering activities provide NURP Ievel removal of TSS 80 and TP 60 prior to discharge For waterbodies classified by the LMRWD as Level I or II the most restrictive classification Section 5 13 3 of the LMRWD WMP requires that new developments construct ponds which provide water quality volume greater than or equal to the 2 5 inch 24 hour storm Providing this amount of water quality volume is equivalent to providing the NURP Ievel removal of TSS and TP listed in the Assessment Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St Paul MN 55113 Tel 651 636 4600 Fax 651 636 1311 www bonestroo com 252 b Sections 5 2 2 and 5 3 2 of the Nondegradation Assessment state that the City sweeps its streets once per year in the spring and other street sweeping is performed throughout the year as necessary Street sweeping practices will be refined to improve the water quality and overall benefit of street sweeping Street sweeping supports the LMRWD goal listed in Section 5 4 of the WMP of reducing non point source pollution in the District The LMRWD WMP also lists street sweeping as a Non structural Source Control8MP WMP Table 5 9 to be potentially implemented into Runoff Management Plans as required in Section 5 13 1 of the WMP 2 Section 5 2 3 of the Nondegradation Assessment states that the Lake Ann subwatershed is projected to generate 845 pounds more TSS in 2020 than was generated in 1990 The Nondegradation Assessment lists the following BMPs that will be considered to mitigate TSS within the watershed a The City will investigate the possibility of retrofitting those outfalls with sump manholes or other devices to collect sediment prior to discharge to the lake The use of sump manholes as a structural storm water 8MP is not specifically addressed in the LMRWD WMP However this type of measure is generally supported by the goals and policies listed in the LMRWD WMP b The City will look for opportunities to reduce runoff by increasing abstraction in the subwatershed to reduce the creation of new TSS Policy 3 in Section 5 5 2 of the LMRWD WMP states that the District encourages the use of temporary surface storm water storage facilities and infiltration techniques wherever practical and environmentally sound c The City will evaluate land use policies governing development for opportunities to reduce the creation of new TSS This measure is generally supported by the goals and policies listed in the LMRWD WMP 3 Section 5 3 3 of the Nondegradation Assessment states that the Lake Ann subwatershed is projected to generate 8 pounds more TP in 2020 than was generated in 1990 with 70 additional pounds TP estimated in the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek subwatershed The City proposes to reduce TP and TSS in the same manner as described about in item 2 The City proposes to reduce TP in the Riley Purgatory Bluff Creek subwatershed using the following BMPs a The City will use its Bluff Creek Overlay District ordinance to protect the Bluff Creek corridor and its wetlands bluffs wooded areas and water resources A significant portion of the subwatershed is within the aforementioned Overlay District Page2of4 253 This measure is generally supported by the goals and policies listed in the LMRWD WMP b The City will incorporate TP reduction BMPs into City projects as opportunities arise if the regulatory program is not successful in limiting new TP This measure is generally supported by the goals and policies listed in the LMRWD WMP 4 The Assessment estimates that stormwater volume increases citywide by about 50 between 1990 and 2020 To mitigate some of this increase the City lists the following regulatory and structural BMPs a Section 5 4 1 of the Assessment states that the City will work with the Watershed Districts to review and consider adopting a volume management requirement Specific measures would be to require Soil Management Plans for development and redevelopment projects and encourage Low Impact Development practices Currently the LMRWD does not require the infiltration or abstraction of stormwater However Policy 3 in Section 5 5 2 of the LMRWD WMP states that the District encourages the use of temporary surface storm water storage facilities and infiltration techniques wherever practical and environmentally sound b Section 5 4 2 of the Assessment states the City will continue to facilitate its education and outreach program to educate citizens of small scale measures that can be implemented on their property to reduce stormwater volume citywide The City will also seek to educate developers on incorporating Low Impact Development practices into development and redevelopment projects Policy 6 in Section 5 6 of the LMRWD WMP states that the District will coordinate with other groups and units of government in developing education programs or implementing ongoing efforts c Section 5 4 3 of the Assessment discusses utilizing the following structural BMPs to reduce storm water volume or its effects infiltration basins constructed wetlands underground infiltration and streambank stabilization Infiltration basins wetland treatment areas and infiltration trenches are listed as example BMPs in Table 5 8 of the LMRWD WMP to be potentially implemented into Runoff Management Plans as required in Section 5 13 1 of the WMP The LMRWD WMP also lists the development and maintenance of recharge areas as a structural discharge elimination BMP WMP Table 5 9 to be potentially implemented into Runoff Management Plans Policy 1 in Section 5 3 2 of the LMRWD WMP states that the District will promote and encourage restoration of disturbed streambanks Page 3 of 4 254 d Section 5 4 4 of the Assessment describes how reforestation is a potential non structural BMP that could be utilized to reduce stormwater volumes and states that the City will reevaluate its existing reforestation program and current preservation practices to reduce the amount of rainfall that runs off the landscape Reforestation as a storm water BMP is not explicitly described in the LMRWD WMP However this type of measure is generally supported by goals and policies listed in the LMRWD WMP e Section 5 4 4 of the Nondegradation Assessment describes how wetland vegetation has the ability to transpire large amounts of water thereby reducing stormwater volume The City will continue to look for additional opportunities to restore wetland areas and the associated upland Wetland restoration is supported by Section 5 9 of the LMRWD WMP which states that one of the goals of the LMRWD is to preserve wetlands for water retention recharge soil conservation wildlife habitat aesthetics and natural enhancement of water quality Page 4 of 4 255 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site WIffl ci chanhassen mn us MEMORANDUM TO Mayor City Council FROM Todd Gerhardt City Manager DATE o k y February 11 2008 SUBJ Appointment to City Council Earlier this evening the City Council discussed the six finalists for the City Council vacancy Staff recommends that the City Council officially appoint to fill the unexpired term of Councilman Peterson which will end on December 31 2008 The City of Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 256 Correspondence Packet Letter from Dave Mol HLB dated January 24 2008 Memo from Paul Oehme re TH 5 Corridor Study Update dated February 4 2008 Memo from Greg Sticha re Review of Claims Paid dated February 1 2008 257 IVe f Ah Y 1 C C III Tautges Redpath Ltd Certified Public Accountants and Consultants RECEIVEKj JAN 2 8 Z008 CITY OF CHANHASSEI l January 24 2008 Mayor and Council City of Chanhassen 7700 Market Blvd Chanhassen MN 553 7 RE Auditor Communications Recently issued audit standards are now effective for the audit of 2007 One of these standards SAS 1 4 Communication with Those Charged with Governance requires auditors to a communicate our responsibilities under generally accepted auditing standards GAAS b issue a written report regarding certain matters at the conclusion of the audit and c to provide for a two way dialogue with you during the course of the audit Our engagement letter dated October 2 2006 details our firm s responsibilities under GAAS A copy of the engagement letter can be obtained from the City s Finance Director Our firm has been issuing written communication under a previous audit standard so you will not see any substantial change regarding that requirement However this new standard recommends providing for a two way dialogue with the governing body throughout the course of the audit As such if you have questions regarding the scope of our audit or if there are any areas of concern that you may have please contact myself or the audit manager Andy Hering Our contact information is provided below David J Mol CPA Andy Hering CPA Direct Dial 65 407 5803 65 1 407 5877 E mail dmol@hlbtr com ahering@hlbtr com If communication with our firm during the course of the audit is desired we request that one individual from your Council be designated as the contact person Sincerely HLB TAUTGES REDPATH LTD David J Mol CPA c Todd Gerhardt City Manager c Greg Sticha Finance Director 4810 White Bear Parkway White Bear Lake Minnesota 55110 I 6514267000 651 426 5004 Fax I www hlbtr com HLB Tautges Redpath ltd is a member of mn International a world wide organization of accounting firms and business advisors 258 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site WWII ci chanhassen mn us MEMORANDUM TO Todd Gerhardt City Manager FROM Paul Oehme Dir of Public Works City Engineer DATE February 4 2008 SUB TH 5 Corridor Study Update PW067B2 BACKGROUND The TH 5 Corridor Study is a joint project between the Cities of Chanhassen Victoria Waconia Young America Carver County and MnDOT The project objective is to identify the future needs of TH 5 from TH 41 to TH 212 The goal of the project is to identify the future transportation needs of the corridor determine the future needed right of way officially map the corridor and look for funding opportunities to make the improvements City officials will be meeting February 7 2008 with project stakeholders to discuss the project and plan for the first open house The open house is tentatively scheduled for the end of February in Victoria Property owners along TH 5 and Minnewashta Parkway in Chanhassen will be notified about the upcoming meeting Also a notice of the open house will be published in the local paper and on the City s website Staff is planning to give the Council an update on the project at future work session after the open house Attached is the latest information for the TH 5 Corridor study Attachments G ENGIPUBLlCIPW067B2 TH 5 Corridor Study 41 to 212 020407 bkgrd TH5 study updute doc The City 01 Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 259 3 00 PM 3 05 PM 3 30 PM 4 00 PM 4 30 PM 4 50 PM 5 00 PM TH 5 CORRIDOR STUDY TH 41 TO TH 212 ADVISORY COMMITTEE Ae MEETING February 7 2008 3 00 5 00 PM Victoria City Hall 7951 Rose Street Victoria MN 952 443 2363 dnm WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS STUDY PROCESS 1 Purpose Objective and Partner Roles And Responsibilities Attachment 1 2 Study Schedule and Work Plan Attachments 2A 2B 3 Decision Making and Organizational Structure Attachment 3 4 Stakeholder Involvement Plan Attachments 4A B 5 Committee Input IDENTIFICA TION OF ISSUES AND NEEDS 1 Issues and Needs Maps Poster Maps Boards 2 Committee Input CORRIDOR VISION 1 Draft Corridor Vision and Design Criteria Attachment 5 2 Committee Input DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEEDS STATEMENT Attachment 6 1 Committee Input NEXT STEPS 1 Open Houses Public Input Meetings o Waconia February 25 o Victoria February 26 2 City Council Presentations o Waconia March 17 or 24 o Victoria March 13 3 Next AC Meeting in June 2008 ADJOURN 260 A TT ACHMENT 1 TH 5 CORRIDOR STUDY TH 41 TO TH 212 STUDY PURPOSE OBJECTIVES AND PARTNER ROLES 12 1 8 07 STUDY PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES Purpose To identify a planning level alignment to guide future planning and improvements along TH 5 from TH 41 to TH 212 Objective The Corridor Study will do the following Examine design concepts that respond to the various urban and rural conditions and travel demands in the corridor Complete an environmental screening to broadly identify potential impacts for this study and to provide direction for future EA EA W documentation on the corridor or its segments Provide guidance to local partners to manage development through their local planning and take advantage of future right of way and access management opportunities Provide direction for local partners in their long range planning and funding PARTNER STUDY PHASE AND PARTNER RESPONSIBILITY A State MnDOT Data Collection See Data Collection Plan Preferred Alternative preliminary horizontal layout development of typical sections ROW needs analysis corresponding cost estimates Stakeholder Involvement TC and AC participation B Local Partners Data Collection See Data Collection Plan Carver County Stakeholder Involvement TC and AC participation Chanhassen Victoria Waconia Norwood Young America C Consultant SRF Project Management Data Collection See Data Collection Plan Base Map Issues and Constraints Map Purpose and Need Development and Refinement of Alternatives Corridor Vision inc generalized cross sections Alignment alternatives Access treatments ROW width corresponding construction and right of way cost estimates Corresponding swaths mapped on 1 200 layouts concept drainage designs Environmental Screening Evaluation and documentation Alternative Selection Process for selecting an alternative for future consideration Phasing Analysis Staging Reports Draft and final Stakeholder Involvement C DoclIlIlents and Settingsyeans Local Settings Temporary Internet Files OLK4 l Purpose Objective and Partner Roles do 261 ATTACHMENT 2A TH 5 Corridor Study TH 41 to TH 212 Schedule Prepared December 18 2007 2007 2008 Activity Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1 0 Project Management 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 0 Data Collection 3 0 Project Purpose and Need 4 0 Alternative Development 5 0 Social Economic Enviornmental Screening 6 0 Alternative Evaluation 7 0 Staging 8 0 Draft Final Reports Draft Final 9 0 Stakeholder Involvement Advisory Committee AC 1 2 3 Technical Committee TCl 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Special Community Meetings 2 Council Presentations 3 County Board Presentation SW Transportation Coalition Open House q Notes 1 Technical Committee meetings 2 4 and 5 are planned to be held as joint meetings with the Advisory Committee 2 Up to three meetings in Victoria and another three meetings in Waconia 3 Includes two presentations to the Victoria City Council two presentations to the Waconia City Council one presentation to the Norwood Young America City Council and one presentation to the Chanhassan City Council total of six presentations 4 Includes two open houses in Victoria and two open houses in Waconia 262 A TT ACHMENT 2B TH 5 CORRIDOR STUDY TH 41 TO TH 212 COMMITEE WORK PLANS AND MEETINGS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 1 DECEMBER Meeting Purpose Kick Off Introduce project partners Outline deliverables and schedule Seek input on key issues Key Topics Purpose and Objective Scope and Schedule Partner Roles and Responsibilities in Terms of Key Deliverables Stakeholder Involvement Plan Other Public Outreach e g press releases coordination with newspapers use of local government websites etc Data Collection Plan Issues and Constraints Begin identifying Preliminary Corridor Vision TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 2 EARLY FEBRUARY Key Topics Data Collection Resolve any remaining data needs Issues and Constraints Present initial findings on issues and constraints Get feedback before council and public meetings Corridor Vision Confirm vision that will be presented to councils and public Initial concepts begin discussing alignment options Purpose and Need Present initial findings get feedback before open houses and council presentations ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1 EARLY FEBRUARY IN CONJUNCTION WITH TC 2 MEETING Key Topics Purpose and Objective Scope and Schedule Partner Roles and Responsibilities in Terms of Key Deliverables Stakeholder Involvement Plan Issues and Constraints Present initial findings on issues and constraints Get feedback before council and public meetings Corridor Vision Present vision that will be presented to councils and public Purpose and Need Present initial findings get feedback before open houses and council presentations Confirm dates for open houses and council presentations 263 A TT ACHMENT 2B FIRST ROUND OF OPEN HOUSES IN VICTORIA AND W ACONIA FEBRUARY MARCH Meeting Purpose Introduce councils to project Outline deliverables and schedule Seek input on key issues Key Topics Schedule Stakeholder Involvement Plan Table Corridor Vision and Design Criteria Purpose and Need Issues and Constraints Council Public Input compatibility of corridor vision with community goals and objecti ves VICTORIA AND W ACONIA CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS FEBRUARY MARCH Meeting Purpose Introduce councils to project Outline deliverables and schedule Seek input on key issues Key Topics Schedule Stakeholder Involvement Plan Table Corridor Vision and Design Criteria Purpose and Need Issues and Constraints Council Public Input compatibility of corridor vision with community goals and objecti ves TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 3 MARCH APRIL Key Topics Council and public input on Corridor Vision Council and public input on Purpose and Need Council and public input on Issues and Constraints Refine initial concepts define alternatives Social Economic and Environmental Impacts Begin discussing Stakeholder Involvement Discuss need plan for special community meetings TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 4 5 6 TBD ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2 3 TBD 264 A TTA CHEMENT 3 TH 5 CORRIDOR STUDY TH 41 TO TH 212 DECISION MAKING STRUCTURE 12 18 07 Open House Meetings 4 Technical Committee SW Transportation Coalition Special Community Meetings 6 Advisory Committee MnlDOT 265 ATTACHMENT 4A TH 5 CORRIDOR STUDY TH 41 TO TH 212 STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM Who Purpose Roles Number of Meetin s City Councils and All Council Members and Commissioners from the following Provide policy direction At critical project milestones Total of7 meetings Carver County Adopt study provisions Consider TCI AC input and recommendations Carver County I mtg Carver County Board Chanhassen Complete implementation Provide comments Chanhassen I mtg Victoria activities Offer policy input Victoria 2 mtg Waconia Approve study products Waconia 2 mtg Norwood Young America Implement recommendations with other governing bodies Norwood Young America I mtg Advisory Committee Elected Officials and Senior Staff of Decision Making Bodies Advise on technical and policy Review technical analyses 3 meetings AC Carver County County Commissioners and County Engineer issues Solicit and consider public input City ofChanhassen Mayor City Manager Public Works Report on input from Review alignment development and evaluation Director Planning Director community Confirm recommendation of preferred alignment and network back to local partner City of Norwood Young America Mayor City Confirm study groups Administrator City Engineer Planning Director recommendations to be made to City of Victoria Mayor City Administrator City City Councils and County Administrator Planning Director City Engineer Board City ofWaconia Mayor City Administrator City Engineer Metropolitan Council Planning Sector Representative Mn DOT South Area Manager Area Engineer Project Manager Southwest Transportation Coalition member Transportation Alliance Legislative Director Technical Committee Senior Technical Staff of Decision Making Bodies Guide overall study process Provide and review data 6 meetings TC MnDOT Victoria Nill Digest input participate in Participate in technical analysis Carver County Engineer Roger Gustafson technical analysis Solicit and consider public input Chanhassen Paul Oehme Make study recommendations Participate in alignment development and evaluation Victoria Cara Geheren TKDA to City Councils and County Recommend preferred alignment and network back to local partner groups Waconia Kreg Schmidt Bolton Menk Board Norwood Young America Kreg Schmidt Bolton Menk Special Community Important Public Private Stakeholders from Study Area with Provide direct stakeholder input Provide input on needs issues constraints opportunities early in study process and Up to 7 meetings Meetings Direct Interest in Corridor Planning Results on study issues and again on alignment alternatives during the evaluation process Victoria up to 3 mtg Southwest Transportation Coalition opportunities Group meetings will offer a communication opportunity where specific concepts can be Waconia up to 3 mtg Public Officials Provide feedback on alignment thoroughly discussed among stakeholders with diverse interests SW Trans Coal I mtg Schools evaluation process Feedback will be recorded and provided to T AC for their consideration during study First Responders process Development Interests Key Property Owners Interest Groups Open House Meetings General Public Encourage public participation Provide an opportunity for the general public to participate in the corridor planning Total of 4 meetings process Victoria 2 mtg Open house input at critical study milestones will be recorded and provided to the T AC Waconia 2 mtg Agency and Major Coordinating Partners Establish project understanding Solicit review agency and major local stakeholder comments for social economic and None Stakeholder Contacts MnDOT and support among review environmental SEE and transportation performance impacts during the corridor MnDOT Office of Environmental Services agencies and major analysis and evaluation process and if necessary follow up meetings will be held on MnDOT Cultural Resources Unit stakeholders specific issues DNR This input will be presented to the T AC for use in their deliberations US Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS Carver County Soil and Water Board MPCA Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Minnesota Landscape Arboretum C Documents and Settings Ijeans ILocal Settings I Temporary Internet FileslOLK414A Public Involvement Strategy doc 268 ATTACHMENT 48 TH 5 Corridor Study Advisory Committee Zip First Name Last Name Tille Organization Department Office Address City State Code Phone 1 Phone 2 Fax E mail Website Community Development Community kaanensontIDci chanhassen mn 1 Kate Aaneson Director City of Chanhassen Development 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 952 227 1139 us hllp Iwww waconla org Norwood Community Development City of Norwood Young Community Young 2 Chelsea Aloer Director America Development 10 First Ave NE PO Box 59 America MN 55368 952 467 1806 caloer@cityofnya com hllp llwww cityofnya coml 3 Susan Arntz City Administrator City of Waconia Administration 201 South Vine St Waconia MN 55387 952 442 3100 952 442 2135 sarntz@waconia org hllp Iwww waconia org I vnn Clarknwokiliildnl otatp mn hllp Iwww dol state m n u 4 Lynn Clarkowski South Area Manager Mn DOT 1500 W County Rd B 2 MS 050 Roseville MN 55113 651 234 7729 s s Carver County Government Center County Commissioner Represents Human Services Buildin9 600 East hllp Iwww CO carver mn u 5 Gayle Degler Chair Carver County District 1 4th St Chaska MN 55318 952 403 7047 952 403 7047 952 227 1110 deoler@co carver mn us s margaretDonahoe@transportatio hllp Iwww transportationa 6 Maroaret Donahoe Leoislative Director Transoortation Alliance 2515 Wabash Ave Suite LL2 Sl Paul MN 55114 651 659 0804 651 659 9009 nalliance com lIiance com hllp Iwww ci chanhassen 7 Tom Furlono Mayor City of Chanhassen City Council 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 952 238 1315 952 474 8891 tfurlono@ci chanhassen mn us mn us TKDA 8 Cara Geheren City Engineer City of Victoria consultant TKDA 444 Cedar St Suite 1500 Saint Paul MN 55101 952 443 2363 651 292 4630 651 292 4400 cara oeheren@tkda com hllp Iwww tkda com http www ci chanhassen 9 Todd Gerhardt City Manager City of Chanhassen Administration 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 952 227 1119 toerhardt@ci chanhassen mn us mn us 55322 hllp llwww co carver mn u 10 Rooer Gustafson County Enoineer Carver County Public Works 11360 Hiohway 212 West Suite 1 Coloone MN 0300 952 466 5206 952 227 1110 rnustafoliilcn carveLm n us s Carver County Government Center Human Services Buildin9 600 East hllp Iwww co carver m n u 11 Dave Hernze County Administrator Carver County Administration 4th St Chaska MN 55318 952 361 1510 952 227 1110 dhemze@co carveLmn us s Hershberger mlhthun@mchsi com hllp Iwww ci victoria mn u 12 Marv Thun Mayor City of Victoria City Council 6490 Bayview Place Excelsior MN 55331 952 470 1212 612 875 2226 952 443 2110 sl Planning and Community hilners rl warnnia orn 13 John Hilqers Planninq Director City of Waconia Development 201 South Vine Street Waconia MN 55387 952 442 3106 hllp Iwww waconia orgl Carver County Government Center County Commissioner Represents Human Services Building 600 East hllp Iwww CO carver m n U 14 James Ische Vice Chair Carver County District 5 4th St Chaska MN 55318 952 466 5851 952 466 5851 952 227 1110 ische@co carver mn us s Planning and Community Development Community hllp Iwww ci victoria mn u 15 Holly Kreft Director City of Victoria Development 7951 Rose P O Box 36 Victoria MN 55386 952 443 4218 952 443 3021 hkreftallci victoria mn us sl Norwood City of Norwood Young Young lavonne@carvercountyredcross 16 LaVonne Kroells Mayor America City Council 10 First Ave NE PO Box 59 America MN 55368 952 467 3214 952 467 3214 952 467 1818 orq hllp Iwww cityofnya coml Member also Chaska Chaska City 470 U S Bank Plaza 200 South 6th 55402 hllp Iwww chaskamn co 17 Bob Lindall City Council Member SWCT Coalition Council Street Minneapolis MN 1458 952 448 5586 612 337 9219 rlindall@kennedy graven com m Carver County Government Cenler Represents Human Services Building 600 East hllp Iwww CO carveLm n u 18Tim Lynch County Commissioner Carver County District 4 4th St Chaska MN 55318 952 353 2598 952 353 2598 952 227 1110 t1ynch@co carveLmn us s Carver County Government Center Represents Human Services Building 600 East hllp Iwww CO carver mn u 19 Randy Maluchnik County Commissioner Carver County District 3 4th St Chaska MN 55318 612 964 5382 612 964 5382 952 227 1110 rmaluchnik@co carver mn us s South Area http www dol state mn u 20 Victoria Nill EngineerlProject Manager Mn DOT 1500 W County Rd B 2 MS 050 Roseville MN 55113 651 234 7723 Victoria Nill@dot state mn us s Public Works DirectorlCity http www ci chanhassen 21 Paul Oehme Enoineer City of Chanhassen Public Works 7700 Market Blvd PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 952 227 1169 poehme@ci chanhassen mn us mn us moexx004l1l umn edu htto Iwww arboretum um 22 Peter Moe Director of Ooerations Minnesota Landscape Arboretum 3675 Arboretum Driye Chaska MN 55318 952 443 1408 n eQJ Jl http www ci victoria mn u 23 Stephen Sarvi City Administrator City of Victoria Administration 7951 Rose P O Box 36 Victoria MN 55386 952 443 4211 952 443 2363 952 443 2110 ssarvi j ci victoria mn us sl Bolton Menk 55318 http www bolton 24 Kreq Schmidt City Engineer City of Waconia Inc consultant 2638 Shadow Ln Suite 200 Chaska MN 1172 952 448 8838 952 448 8805 kreosc@bolton menk com menk com 25 Mark Schiffman Mayor City of Waconia City Council 201 South Vine Street Waconia MN 55387 912 716 1812 912 716 1812 952 442 2135 marko hiffmanliilvah m http www waconia orol Norwood City of Norwood Young Young 26 Tom Simmons City Administrator America Administration 10 First Ave NE PO Box 59 America MN 55368 952 467 1805 952 467 1818 tsim mons@cityofnya com hllp Iwww cityofnya coml Planning Sector 3 4A Carver hllp Iwww metrocouncil o 27 Jim Uttley Reoresentative Metrooolitan Council County 390 N Robert Sl SI Paul MN 55101 651 602 1361 651 602 1464 Jim uttley@metc stale mn us rg arver ounty overnment en er Represents Human Services Building 600 East hllp Iwww co carver mn u 28 Tom Workman County Commissioner Carver County District 2 4th St Chaska MN 55318 952 250 4924 952 486 7771 952 227 1110 tworkman@co carver mn us s 266 TH 5 CORRIDOR STUDY TH 41 TO TH 212 CORRIDOR VISION AND DESIGN CRITERIA 1 DRAFT 1 31 08 A Minor Norwood Young Arterial Chanhassen 1 Victoria 2 Middle Segment 3 Waconia 4 West Segment 5 America 6 Segment Termini TH 41 to CSAH 13 to Krey A ve to South Birch Road South Birch Road to Orchard Orchard Road to Central 5th Ave to CSAH 13 Krey A venue Road A venue South TH 212 Posted Speed 55 mph Less than 45 mph 55 mph Less than 45 mph 55 mph 55 mph Typical 4 lane urban divided 4 lane urban 4 lane urban 2 lane rural Bvpass Roadway raised or depressed 4 lane rural divided raised or depressed Preserve ROW for future Section median to be determined median to be determined 4 lane rural divided 4 lane urban divided Pedestrian and Trail adjacent to TH 5 Separate trail and or Trail adjacent to TH 5 Separate trail and or Trail adjacent to TH 5 Trail adjacent to TH 5 Bicycle Trails roadway sidewalks along TH 5 roadway sidewalks along TH 5 roadway bypass 1 2 mile full 1 4 mile full lI2 mile full l 4 mile full 1 2 mile full l 2 mile full Intersection intersection spacing intersection spacing intersection spacing intersection spacing intersection spacing intersection spacing Spacing 1 4 mile secondary liS mile secondary 1 4 mile secondary liS mile secondary 1 4 mile secondary 1 4 mile secondary Guidelines intersection spacing intersection spacing intersection spacing intersection spacing intersection spacing intersection spacing Signal Spacing 1 2 mile 1 4 mile 1 2 mile 1 4 mile 1 2 mile 1 2 mile Private Access Strongly discourage new private access Guidelines Investigate ways to provide alternative access for private businesses and residences over time as opportunities arise 120 feet without trail 120 feet without trail 120 feet without trail 130 feet with sidewalks 130 feet with sidewalks 130 feet with sidewalks 135 feet with trail and streetscape and streetscape and streetscape and streetscape 135 feet with trail and 210 feet without trail 135 feet with trail and 210 feet without trail 135 feet with trail and Right of Way 150 feet with trail streetscape and double streetscape 240 feet with trail streetscape 240 feet with trail streetscape 150 feet with trail 150 feet with trail 150 feet with trail left turn lanes streetscape and double streetscape and double streetscape and double left turn lanes left turn lanes left turn lanes Note 1 Contingent on Mn DOT concurrence 267 TH 5 CORRIDOR STUDY TH 41 TO TH 212 DRAFT PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT INTRODUCTION Trunk Highway TH 5 runs in a southwest northeast direction between TH 7 and TH 212 in Carver County Minnesota In the context of other transportation routes in Carver County TH 5 is a key minor arterial that provides east west mobility through the county While rapid urban growth has occurred to the east of the study area in Eden Prairie and Chanhassen this growth is now extending outward to Victoria and Waconia Based on Metropolitan Council demographics data the cities of Victoria and Waconia have grown by 50 percent and 40 percent respectively during that period 2000 to 2006 The segment of TH 5 under study serves the growing communities of Chanhassen Victoria Waconia and Norwood Young America which lie in the western suburbs ofthe Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Currently TH 5 is a four lane divided arterial from 1 494 to TH 41 however west ofTH 41 it is a two lane undivided arterial that extends through Victoria and Waconia until it connects at TH 212 in Norwood Young America a distance of approximately 18 miles Based on the Carver County Transportation Plan Update future growth in Victoria and Waconia as well as in eastern and central Carver County is expected to result in a need to expand TH 5 to a four lane facility from TH 41 to a point west ofWaconia However due to current funding limitations this two lane section is not scheduled for any measurable capacity upgrades until after 2030 based on the current Mn DOT Metro District Transportation System Plan Metro TSP Because of anticipated growth both now and in the future along the corridor and the opportunities for communities to manage development through their planning powers i e orient development to coincide with future TH 5 improvements such as implementing access spacing guidelines and preserving right of way there is a concerted effort by Mn DOT Carver County and the affected communities to define potential future improvements to TH 5 This enables the stakeholder communities to guide short and interim term state and local land use economic development and traffic circulation decisions that support and compliment the longer term TH 5 improvement program The intent of this study is to propose and analyze corridor concept alternatives to conduct initial environmental screening that identifies fatal flaws to be avoided and to select a design concept that can be carried into a future environmental study It will also identify the needed right of way and access management strategies related to expanding TH 5 to a four lane roadway so that future development and community planning decisions can be made that support and complement the vision for TH 5 as funding for the planned improvements is secured PURPOSE AND NEED OF THE PROJECT The purpose of the proposed project is to maintain the function of TH 5 as a safe east west minor arterial serving the growing communities of Chanhassen Victoria Waconia and Norwood Young America TH 5 Corridor Study 1 2 412008 269 The first step in the process of developing transportation alternatives is identifying the corridor s needs Base on previously completed planning documents input from the Technical Committee and TH 5 safety and performance data the following three primary needs have been identified A Enhance mobility by improving capacity and operations on TH 5 B Improve safety within the TH 5 corridor C Provide sufficient system linkage for the growing communities of Chanhassen Victoria Waconia and Norwood Young America A ENHANCING MOBILITY The anticipated growth for western and central Carver County will increase demand for upgraded transportation infrastructure Table I shows existing volumes in 2006 and 2030 base travel demand volumes i e the 2030 volume on TH 5 if only currently programmed capacity improvements are made for the six segments of the study corridor These forecasted volumes were developed for the 2008 Carver County Transportation Plan Segments that exceed their design capacity are highlighted in dark gray and those approaching capacity e g between 85 percent and 100 percent of their design capacity are highlighted in light gray in Table 1 TABLE 1 CONGESTION IN 2006 AND 2030 BASE Average Daily Traffic ADT Volumes and Roadway Design Capacity 2 Lane Rural 2030 Base Undivided V olume to Capacity Ratio 2006 ADT ADT Roadway Design Segment Volume Volume Capacity Chanhassen TH 41 to 23 000 26 000 15 000 CSAH 13 Victoria CSAH 13 to 17 000 18 200 15 000 Krey Ave Middle Segment Krey 13 600 22 000 15 000 Ave to South Birch Rd Waconia South Birch Rd 15 000 25 000 15 000 to Orchard Rd West Segment South 7 200 12 300 15 000 0 48 0 82 Birch Rd to Orchard Rd Norwood Young 8 700 10 700 15 000 0 58 0 71 America Source Carver County 2008 Transportation Plan TH 5 Corridor Study 2 2 4 2008 270 e vlepir l IcLe d Scott Sibley TH 5 Corridor Study 3 EXISTING CONGESTION lI RYIUl COUMT Y S m n Legend VolumelCapacity Ratio G ES lDJ pprcacnn c ac ty 1 01 IO r C 3pa l J Railroads LJ Carver County Municipal Boundaries l e U O T c er C IJ OO N 6 o 2 4 I I I 1 I Miles U ll I C Cno l 1 2 412008 271 Based on the 2006 volumes 5 5 miles or approximately 30 percent of the 18 mile study corridor is currently congested i e daily volumes exceed the two lane rural undivided roadway s design capacity of 15 000 vehicles per day Segments that are congested are shown in dark gray in Figure 1 and Table 1 An additional 4 5 miles or approximately 25 percent of the 18 mile study corridor is approaching congestion i e daily volumes exceed 85 percent of a two hme rural undivided roadway s design capacity which is 12 750 vehicles per day Segments that are approaching congestion are shown in light gray in Figure 1 and Table 1 When considering the forecasted growth in vehicle trips in 2030 approximately 10 miles or over 50 percent of the 18 mile study corridor is expected to be congested Existing and future capacity constraints on TH 5 result in recurring daily congestion throughout the corridor As noted earlier improvements that increase capacity on TH 5 would allow for greater volumes of traffic to flow through the area and decrease these operational delays The need to expand and improve TH 5 is further documented in the current Mn DOT Metro TSP see Table 2 however due to funding constraints none of these projects are programmed before 2030 TABLE 2 MNIDOT METRO TSP 2008 2030 Project Description Total Type of Time Frame Amount Project Cost Work Needed NOT Funded TH 5 W of Oak Ave Waconia 60 000 000 4 lane 2008 2014 60 000 000 to W ofTH 41 TH 5 from Strong Dr Waconia 29 574 000 Turn Lanes 2008 2014 29 574 000 to Stieger Lake Ln Victoria TH 5 TH 41 Intersection 500 000 Rebuild 2008 2014 500 000 Chanhassen Intersection As rapid urbanization occurs along the corridor particularly in the communities of Victoria and Waconia TH 5 will need to carry much more traffic In addition to causing congestion on TH 5 increases in traffic volumes throughout the study area are anticipated to divert regional traffic to local streets therefore increasing congestion and decreasing safety in other locations An ancillary concern for the local roadways is the impact of overflow TH 5 traffic on the small town character of these communities The cities of Victoria and Waconia have designated TH 5 as their primary commercial industrial corridor in their comprehensive plans with the aim to concentrate urban uses adjacent to TH 5 while protecting the small town character outside of the corridor If traffic congestion on TH 5 influences commuters to use alternate routes on local roadways this will negatively impact the small town character of these communities Thus TH 5 Corridor Study 4 2 412008 272 there is a need to examine capacity improvements on TH 5 that allow greater volumes of traffic to flow through the area to address the recurring daily congestion B IMPROVING SAFETY Public safety is a high priority for all agencies responsible for maintaining and improving public transportation facilities To evaluate potential safety problems on TH 5 a crash analysis was performed as part of the Carver County Transportation Plan Update using MnlDOT and Carver County crash records from 2001 2005 This investigation of crash data focused on identifying problems at intersections and on roadway segments countywide with the resulting analysis directly applicable to the TH 5 study corridor The 2001 2005 crash data was used to calculate the overall crash rate for TH 5 which is 1 6 crashes per million vehicle miles traveled Compared to the statewide average crash rate for a rural two lane undivided highway of 1 3 crashes per million vehicle miles traveled the TH 5 crash rate is over 20 percentage points higher than the statewide average crash rate Of particular note is the rate of fatal crashes along TH 5 which is 1 62 crashes per hundred million vehicle miles traveled Compared to the 2006 statewide average fatality rate for trunk highways of 0 95 crashes per hundred million vehicle miles traveled the rate of fatality crashes along TH 5 is over 70 percentage points higher than the statewide average TABLE 3 TH 5 HIGH CRASH FREQUENCY AND CRASH RATE LOCATIONSl of Crash A TH 5 B Statewide Crash TH 5 Location Crashes Frequency Crash Rate Average Crash Rate length in miles 2001 crashes per crashes per Rate crashes per Ratio 2005 mile per million vehicle million vehicle A I B year miles traveled miles traveled Minnewashta Parkway to CR 13 59 16 86 2 01 1 3 1 5 0 72 miles Victoria Drive to TH 36 14 4 2 46 1 3 1 9 5 0 54 miles TH 5 to west of Zinnia Street 29 11 6 2 34 1 3 1 8 0 52 miles Birch Street to CR 10 21 14 2 56 1 3 2 0 0 32 miles TH 284 to CR 32 90 30 5 3 1 3 4 1 0 57 miles CR 33 to TH 212 8 4 44 5 66 1 3 4 4 0 35 miles Crash rates are based on analYSIS of County and Mn DOT crash data 2001 2005 TH 5 Corridor Study 5 2 412008 273 FIGURE 2 HIGH CRASH RATE SEGMENTS ON TH 5 vli ht EJ ffiJ t trr t j T 1 y l 1 I I J ffi t I r J rn L ft 1 rTl r j l l1 r n L I I t J r t j tl f rn n riI I J fiJ fJJ L Ii tI e me ip l I l ffiJ t f Ne G rmany 1 L r 1 J I I 1 v E 0 l t Mayer r mJ IdcriJ i I mll J I l Char S8l 1 p ffi r L L l 4 D J r J c r 4 L ffi I r itm tr t lie eod I ft i lE t f C 6 l ii I I r b mJi ilt 1 w 4 iI l I 1 l tT t C03 j r d 1 17 oj I Eh l r J m ID k J L X L 1 rm y j ch i I r 1 I l t I J I I r N r lml U T 1 i 1 j 1 I i Y b f i L 1 Cdo ge iJ j r tfEJ I 1 r I D I r k 0 J i TJ r fro E i6 X C fj v HalTb rd r r 4 l I r lm I rID t if j dn j lE J I il f j t t i L l I t r tt r rv r J co Sibley r h tfJ I 0 1 v J I Hli 1 I I i f I l r c J HIGH CRASH RATE SEGMENTS r CA ftVI Il COUNI Y l M 1 i lflfnt t l Legend Segment Crashes H gh Rate High Frequency H gh Rate la Frequ ncy t Railroads Car er County Municipal Boundaries @9 US Highways iE State Highways @ Count 1 Roads acuu l r t01C O J j f t1 c h e lJ t1 tOTf h he I U f e M t1 f 5tlTe 1w e 71 e Z tltt tll cnt H h F el m i lm t n e t r I tOllI F a m y l D e c s c c errrir tf rt o 2 4 6 I I I I I Ivlaes IDiCO I Il I C C nUl 1 1 TH 5 Corridor Study 6 2 4 2008 274 In order to identify segments with high crash rates a comparison was made between Mn DOT statewide average crash rates for rural two lane undivided highways and the crash frequency and crash rate for discrete segments of TH 5 based on Average Daily Traffic ADT volumes see Table 3 The Carver County Transportation Plan Update identified high crash segments as those having a crash rate ratio greater than 1 5 times the statewide average crash rate for a rural two lane undivided highway see Figure 2 This means that the crash rate for light gray and dark gray segments in Figure 2 are at least 50 percent higher than the statewide average crash rate for comparable roadways The crash rate ratio is calculated by dividing the TH 5 crash rate column A in Table 3 by the statewide average crash rate column B in Table 3 Table 3 and Figure 2 also identify high and low frequency crash segments as those with more than four crashes per mile per year Using these criteria six locations along TH 5 have crash rate ratios greater than 1 5 times the statewide average for a rural two lane undivided highway and more than four crashes per mile per year The above average fatality rate and overall high crash rate coupled with the six locations on TH 5 with high rates and high frequencies of crashes indicates that further attention is needed to determine the appropriate safety improvements C SYSTEM LINKAGE TH 5 is the primary east west route serving the growing communities of Chanhassen Victoria Waconia and Norwood Young America Table 4 shows that forecasted growth in population and employment for these communities The City of Victoria is expected to grow in population by almost 600 percent and by almost 500 percent in employment from 2000 to 2030 Although the expected growth of Waconia Chanhassen and Norwood Young America is not as large as Victoria they show sizeable population and employment growth as noted in Table 4 Within Carver County downtown Waconia wherein the Ridgeview Medical Center is located is one of the County s largest employment nodes Thus maintaining sufficient system linkage to downtown Waconia is essential to maintaining the economic vitality for a key commercial center within Carver County TH 5 also functions as a main artery for Carver County in terms of providing access to medical services The roadway not only provides critical system linkages for the cities of Victoria and Waconia to the metropolitan area but it also serves as a vital connection between these growing population and employment centers and Waconia s Ridgeview Medical Center which employs 1 300 people and operates 8 ambulances A well functioning TH 5 translates into shorter response times for emergency and medical vehicles as well as patients wanting to access hospital services Bob Stevenson Ridgeview Medical Center s CEO reported at a community meeting in January 2008 that emergency response times had increased by five minutes over the last five years due to congestion and other roadway deficiencies Furthermore there are relatively few other medical options in the immediate vicinity with the nearest hospitals approximately 20 miles away in Shakopee Glencoe and Arlington The Ridgeview Medical Center has a service area of 732 square miles which covers all of Carver County and parts of adjacent counties Given the limited availability of hospital services in the area access to Ridgeview Medical Center in Waconia via TH 5 is and will continue to be critically important for many years to come TH 5 Corridor Study 7 2 4 2008 275 TABLE 4 2000 AND 2030 PROJECTED GROWTH IN POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT Percent Percent Population Employment 2000 2030 Growth 2000 2030 Growth Population Population 2000 30 Employment Employment 2000 2030 Chanhassen 20 321 38 000 87 7 571 13 900 84 Victoria 4 025 28 000 596 932 5 100 447 Waconia 6 814 25 000 267 4 082 13 000 218 Norwood Young 3 108 8 800 183 1 559 2 670 71 America Source U S Census Bureau and Metropolitan Council revised January 9 2008 SUMMARY OF PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED The purpose of this study is to investigate alternatives for TH 5 that would enhance mobility improve safety and provide sufficient system linkages for the communities along the corridor Based on this purpose the following three needs were identified for TH 5 that necessitate improvements to the corridor A Congestion currently exists in the TH 5 study area With no major capacity or safety improvements programmed the intensity and duration of delays along the corridor will grow to make over 50 percent ofthe study corridor congested by 2030 B The crash and fatality rates for TH 5 are over 20 and 70 percentage points higher respectively than the statewide average rates for comparable roadways In addition there exist six locations within the study area that have crash frequencies and crash rates that are well above the statewide average and require attention C TH 5 is the primary east west route that connects the growing communities of Chanhassen Victoria Waconia and Norwood Young America to the inter regional corridors system and the metropolitan area Ridgeview Medical Center located in downtown Waconia on the north side ofTH 5 is a regional hospital with a service area of 732 square miles Improvements to TH 5 are needed to maintaining sufficient system linkages for the Ridgeview Medical Center as well as for residents and businesses along the burgeoning TH 5 corridor TH 5 Corridor Study 8 2 412008 276 CITY OF CHANHASSEN 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen MN 55317 Administration Phone 952 227 1100 Fax 952 227 1110 Building Inspections Phone 952 227 1180 Fax 952 227 1190 Engineering Phone 952 227 1160 Fax 952 227 1170 Finance Phone 952 227 1140 Fax 952 227 1110 Park Recreation Phone 952 227 1120 Fax 952 227 1110 Recreation Center 2310 Coulter Boulevard Phone 952 227 1400 Fax 952 227 1404 Planning Natural Resources Phone 952 227 1130 Fax 952 227 1110 Public Works 1591 Park Road Phone 952 227 1300 Fax 952 227 1310 Senior Center Phone 952 227 1125 Fax 952 227 1110 Web Site WIWI cLchanhassen mn us MEMORANDUM TO Mayor City Council FROM G I Greg Sticha Finance Director DATE February 1 2008 SUBJECT Review of Claims Paid The following claims are submitted for review on February 11 2008 Check Numbers Amounts 135457 135588 318 047 03 January Visa charges 44 989 05 Total All Claims 363 036 08 Attachments Check Summary Check Detail Report Visa Listing The City 01 Chanhassen A growing community with clean lakes quality schools a charming downtown thriving businesses winding trails and beautiful parks A great place to live work and play 277 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Accounts Payable Printed 02 0 I 2008 08 32 User danielle Checks by Date Summary by Check Number Summary Check Number Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Amount Check Amount 135457 AIELE A I ELECTRIC SERVICE 01 24 2008 0 00 1 688 29 135458 ABRAUT ABRA AUTOBODY GLASS 01 24 2008 0 00 3 110 21 135459 ACSGOV ACS GOVERNMENT 01 24 2008 0 00 624 19 135460 cargil CARGILL INCORPORATED 01 24 2008 0 00 12 944 39 135461 CARTRE CARVER COUNTY TREASURER 01 24 2008 0 00 14 633 36 135462 EMPGRO EMPLOYEE GROUP FUND 01 24 2008 0 00 918 00 135463 ESCTEL ESCHE LON TELECOM INC 01 24 2008 0 00 8 651 51 135464 galls GALLS INC 01 24 2008 0 00 21 98 135465 gopsig GOPHER SIGN COMPANY 01 24 2008 0 00 159 43 135466 mnucfu Minnesota UC Fund 01 24 2008 0 00 12 70 135467 OFFMAX OFFICE MAX 01 24 2008 0 00 117 14 135468 PeaHea Peak Heating and Cooling 01 24 2008 0 00 780 00 135469 ROWEKA ROWEKAMP ASSOCIATES INC 01 24 2008 0 00 2 960 70 135470 SCOTT SCOTT ASSOCIATES INC 01 24 2008 0 00 1 294 66 135471 SHAGRA SHAKOPEE GRAVEL INC 01 24 2008 0 00 847 59 135472 TRCOM TR COMPUTER SALES LLC 01 24 2008 0 00 2 416 01 135473 VisSew Visu Sewer Clean Seal Inc 01 24 2008 0 00 14 507 68 135474 xcel XCEL ENERGY INC 01 24 2008 0 00 10 387 74 135475 aarp AARP VOID 01 24 2008 210 00 0 00 135476 aspequ Aspen Equipment 01 24 2008 0 00 292 28 135477 A YDTMILL MILLIE A YDT 01 24 2008 0 00 100 00 135478 benext BENEFIT EXTRAS INC 01 24 2008 0 00 191 25 135479 BOYTRU Boyer Truck Parts 01 24 2008 0 00 64 02 135480 CARLIC CARVER COUNTY LICENSE CENTER 01 24 2008 0 00 100 00 135481 CARTRE CARVER COUNTY TREASURER 01 24 2008 0 00 25 50 135482 corexp CORPORATE EXPRESS 01 24 2008 0 00 39 36 135483 EARAND EARL F ANDERSEN INC 01 24 2008 0 00 960 34 135484 GSDIR GS DIRECT INC 01 24 2008 0 00 109 88 135485 HANTHO HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON 01 24 2008 0 00 26 00 135486 johnroby Robyn Johnson 01 24 2008 0 00 4 50 135487 larslorr LORRELLE LARSON 01 24 2008 0 00 131 18 135488 LUNBRO LUNDGREN BROS CONSTRUCTION 01 24 2008 0 00 1 500 00 135489 Iymlum LYMAN LUMBER 01 24 2008 0 00 41 75 135490 MASS MN ASSOCIATION OF SENIOR SERV 01 24 2008 0 00 140 00 135491 MNARB MN Society of Arboriculture 01 24 2008 0 00 40 00 135492 MNHOR MN STATE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY 01 24 2008 0 00 50 00 135493 MNLIFE MINNESOTA LIFE 01 24 2008 0 00 1 509 63 135494 MRPA MN RECREATION PARK ASSOC 01 24 2008 0 00 100 00 135495 nagapp NAGELL APPRAISAL CONSULTING 01 24 2008 0 00 300 00 135496 NATARB NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION 01 24 2008 0 00 15 00 135497 qualcon Quality Control Integration 01 24 2008 0 00 6 811 60 135498 RelOff Reliable Office Supplies 01 24 2008 0 00 65 37 135499 SENSYS SENTRY SYSTEMS INC 01 24 2008 0 00 193 95 135500 SPRPCS SPRINT PCS 01 24 2008 0 00 217 51 135501 SPSCOM SPS COMPANIES INC 01 24 2008 0 00 26 93 135502 statri STAR TRIBUNE 01 24 2008 0 00 223 08 135503 supwlr Superior Wireless Communicatio 01 24 2008 0 00 207 66 135504 target TARGET 01 24 2008 0 00 2 I 80 135505 TOLGAS TOLL GAS WELDING SUPPLY 01 24 2008 0 00 47 99 135506 VERIZO VERIZON WIRELESS 01 24 2008 0 00 15 42 135507 waydau WAYNE DAUW ALTER PLUMBING 01 24 2008 0 00 567 97 135508 xcel XCELENERGYINC VOID 01 24 2008 14 533 18 0 00 135509 ZIEGLE ZIEGLER INC 01 24 2008 0 00 75 56 135510 AARP AARP 01 24 2008 0 00 140 00 135511 aarp AARP 01 24 2008 0 00 70 00 135512 xce1 XCEL ENERGY INC 01 24 2008 0 00 10 884 18 135513 xcel XCEL ENERGY INC 01 24 2008 0 00 3 649 00 135514 3DSPE 3D SPECIALTIES 01 31 2008 0 00 33 I 86 135515 ABRAUT ABRA AUTOBODY GLASS 01 31 2008 0 00 99 95 135516 HA WCHE HA WKINS CHEMICAL 01 31 2008 0 00 85 00 135517 katfue KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 01 31 2008 0 00 1 677 38 135518 KIMHOR KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 01 31 2008 0 00 58 741 49 Page I 278 CITY OF CHANHASSEN Accounts Payable Printed 02 01 2008 08 32 User danielle Checks by Date Summary by Check Number Summary Check Number Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Amount Check Amount 135519 rylhom Ry and Homes 01 31 2008 0 00 86 626 64 35520 wolfor Wolff Fording Co 01 31 2008 0 00 1 731 00 135521 ARAMAR ARAMARK 01 31 2008 0 00 3 15 44 135522 ASCAP ASCAP 01 31 2008 0 00 294 00 135523 aspequ Aspen Equipment 01 31 2008 0 00 909 81 135524 AITAZ AT T CONSUMER LEASE SERVICES 01 31 2008 0 00 14 62 135525 AUTUNL AUTOMOTIVE UNLIMITED 01 31 2008 0 00 95 61 135526 bercof BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 01 31 2008 0 00 260 95 135527 betroa BEITER ROADS 01 31 2008 0 00 24 95 135528 BIELHELE HELEN BIELSKI 01 31 2008 0 00 14 00 35529 borsta BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 01 31 2008 0 00 225 25 135530 CARGlL CARGILL INCORPORATED 01 31 2008 0 00 6 222 62 135531 ciabe1 Ciao Bella 01 31 2008 0 00 153 89 135532 corexp CORPORATE EXPRESS 01 31 2008 0 00 310 47 135533 dah mind Mindy Dahl 01 31 2008 0 00 34 00 135534 deltoo DELEGARD TOOL COMPANY 01 31 2008 0 00 258 18 135535 dencus DENALI CUSTOM HOMES INC 01 31 2008 0 00 1 500 00 135536 emeaut EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH INC 01 31 2008 0 00 94 74 135537 exeoce Executive Ocean Inc 01 31 2008 0 00 130 41 35538 facmot FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 01 31 2008 0 00 890 84 135539 firres FIRE RESCUE MAGAZINE 01 31 2008 0 00 39 95 135540 forame FORCE AMERICA INC 01 31 2008 0 00 99 73 135541 gopsig GOPHER SIGN COMPANY 01 31 2008 0 00 1 215 81 135542 HITECH HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES 01 31 2008 0 00 138 93 135543 hoothr Hoops Threads 01 31 2008 0 00 245 25 135544 ICMART ICMA RETIREMENT AND TRUST 457 01 31 2008 0 00 2 179 09 135545 katfue KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE 01 31 2008 0 00 149 10 135546 keusmatt Matt Keuseman 01 31 2008 0 00 8 33 35547 KRAAND KRAUS ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION 01 31 2008 0 00 200 00 135548 LANEQ1 Lano Equipment 01 31 2008 0 00 2 98 135549 leodan Leo s Dancewear Inc 01 31 2008 0 00 1 877 68 135550 MACEQU MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT 01 31 2008 0 00 1 653 05 135551 mcrekim KIM MCREA VY 01 31 2008 0 00 68 00 135552 MEFIRE METRO FIRE OFFICERS ASSOC 01 31 2008 0 00 100 00 135553 metfor METROPOLITAN FORD 01 31 2008 0 00 428 39 135554 MNCHIL MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CTR 01 31 2008 0 00 320 38 135555 MNIAAI MN CHAPTER IAAI 01 31 2008 0 00 225 00 135556 MRPA MN RECREATION PARK ASSOC 01 31 2008 0 00 90 00 135557 MSRS MSRS 01 31 2008 0 00 2 613 18 135558 MSSA MSSA 01 31 2008 0 00 35 00 135559 mvec MN V ALLEY ELECTRIC COOP 01 31 2008 0 00 550 64 135560 napa NAPA AUTO TRUCK PARTS 01 31 2008 0 00 76 55 135561 NA TRET NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 01 31 2008 0 00 5 202 09 135562 NCPERS MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE 01 31 2008 0 00 16 00 135563 nextel NEXTEL 01 31 2008 0 00 2 614 38 35564 OLSFIR OLSEN FIRE PROTECTION 01 31 2008 0 00 437 00 135565 ourdes OUR DESIGNS INC 01 31 2008 0 00 78 95 135566 palwes PALMER WEST CONSTRUCTION 01 31 2008 0 00 412 00 135567 piertara Tara Pierson 01 31 2008 0 00 28 00 135568 POST POSTMASTER 01 31 2008 0 00 685 58 135569 prdia PR DIAMOND PRODUCTS INC 01 31 2008 0 00 246 00 135570 PUMMET PUMP AND METER SERVICES INC 01 31 2008 0 00 639 00 135571 quaflo Quality Flow Systems Inc 01 31 2008 0 00 787 52 135572 reedkati Katie Reed 01 31 2008 0 00 44 44 135573 satshe SATELLITE SHELTERS INC 01 31 2008 0 00 682 67 135574 SHUSUP SHURAIL SUPPLY INC 01 31 2008 0 00 8 13 135575 SPRPCS SPRINT pes 01 31 2008 0 00 21 03 135576 stekop Steiner Koppelman 01 31 2008 0 00 1 500 00 135577 STREIC STREICHER S 01 31 2008 0 00 246 98 135578 subche SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 01 31 2008 0 00 410 93 135579 tecgra TECHNAGRAPHICS 01 31 2008 0 00 222 84 135580 TFSTRIKE T F Striker 01 31 2008 0 00 475 00 Page 2 279 CITY OF CHANHASSEN User danieIle Check Number 135581 135582 135583 135584 135585 135586 135587 135588 Vendor No TOLGAS TWIGAR UNIW A Y W ACDOD wac far xcel ZEPMAN ZIEGLE Accounts Payable Checks by Date Summary by Check Number Vendor Name TOLL GAS WELDING SUPPLY TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO UNITED WAY W ACONIA DODGE WACONIA FARM SUPPLY XCEL ENERGY INC ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY ZIEGLER INC Check Date 01 31 2008 01 31 2008 01 31 2008 01 31 2008 01 31 2008 01 31 2008 01 31 2008 01 31 2008 Report Total Printed 02 01 2008 08 32 Summary Void Amount 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 14 743 18 Check Amount 98 94 1 463 93 34 40 162 48 149 77 2 I 887 3 I 22 I I 3 803 10 318 047 03 Page 3 280 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle 3DSPE Ck 135514 Inv 426224 Line Item Date 12 04 07 Inv 426224 Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description Vests Sqal Jc Sweatshirt Ck 135514 Total 3DSPE AIELE Ck 135457 01 24 08 Inv 13634 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 3 1 07 School Well Material Labor Inv 13634 Total Ck 135457 Total AIELE AARP Ck 135510 01 24 08 Inv 01162008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 16 08 Defensive Driving 1 16 08 Inv 01162008 Total Ck 135510 Total Ck 135511 01 24 08 Inv 01172008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 17 08 1 10 08 1 17 08 Defensive Driving Inv 01172008 Total Ck 135511 Total aarp ABRAUT Ck 135458 Inv 012993 Line Item Date 12 06 07 Inv 012993 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description Gregg Geske Accident Reimb Ck 135458 Total Ck 135515 01 31 08 Inv 012993 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 Sales Tax G Geske Accident Inv 012993 Total Ck 135515 Total Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount Line Item Account 10 1 1320 4240 331 86 331 86 331 86 331 86 Line Item Account 700 0000 4552 1 688 29 1 688 29 1 688 29 1 688 29 Line Item Account 101 1560 4300 140 00 140 00 140 00 Line Item Account 101 1560 4300 70 00 70 00 70 00 210 00 Line Item Account 101 1220 4520 3 110 21 3 110 21 3 110 21 Line Item Account 101 1220 4520 99 95 99 95 99 95 Page I 281 CJTY OF CHANHAS User danieIle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 ABRAUT Amount 3 210 16 ACSGOV Ck 135459 Jnv 66627 Line Item Date 12 20 07 Jnv 66627 Total 0 24 08 Line Item Description FH Mabile Preplan Viewer Support Line Item Account 400 4117 4703 624 19 624 19 Ck 135459 Total 624 19 ACSGOV 624 19 ARAMAR Account 101 1170 4110 Ck 135521 0 3 08 Jnv 609938 Line Item Date 0 24 08 Jnv 609938 Total Line Item Description Coffee Supplies Line Item Account 101 1170 4J 10 3 J 5 44 315 44 Ck 135521 Total 315 44 ARAMAR 315 44 ASCAP Ck 135522 01 3 08 Jnv 01302008 Line Jtem Date Line Item Description 0 30 08 Annual ASCAP Fee Jnv 01302008 Total Line Item Account 101 1600 4300 294 00 294 00 Ck 135522 Total 294 00 ASCAP 294 00 aspequ Ck 135476 0 24 08 Jnv 10032913 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 08 08 Hitch Pin 1 Hairpin Cotter Jnv 10032913 Total Line Item Account 10 1 1550 4140 23 60 23 60 Jnv 10032914 Line Item Date Line Jtem Description 0 08 08 313 Solenoid Control Jnv 10032914 Total Line Item Account 10 1 1320 4140 268 68 268 68 Ck 135476 Total 292 28 Ck 135523 01 3 08 Jnv 10033323 Line Jtem Date Line Item Description 01 16 08 mvp center flap cutting edge Jnv 10033323 Total Line Item Account 101 1550 4140 909 81 909 81 Ck 135523 Total 909 81 Page 2 282 CITY OF CHANHAS User danieIle aspequ ATTAZ Ck 135524 0I 3I 08 Inv 01142008 Line Item Date Line Item Description OI I4 08 Leased EquipmentJan 14 Apr 14 0I I4 08 Leased Equipment Ian 14 Apr 14 Inv 01142008 Total Ck 135524 Total ATTAZ AUTUNL Ck 135525 Inv 59623 Line Item Date o I 25 08 Inv 59623 Total Ck 135525 Total AUTUNL 0I 3J 08 Line Item Description Front wheel alignment A YDTMILL Ck 135477 01 24 08 Jnv 01232008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 23 08 Senior Center Inv 01232008 Total Ck 135477 Total A YDTMILL benext Ck 135478 Inv 25354 Line Item Date o I 2 I O 8 Inv 25354 Total Ck 135478 Total benext bereof Ck 135526 Inv 695519 Line Item Date 01 23 08 Inv 695519 Total Ck 135526 Total bereof o I 24 08 Line Item Description COBRA Renewal Fee 01 3 I 08 Line Item Description Gourmet Decaf Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 0I 08 08 33 Amount 1 202 09 Line Item Account 700 0000 4310 701 0000 4310 7 31 7 31 14 62 14 62 14 62 Line Item Account 101 1310 4140 95 61 95 61 95 61 95 61 Line Item Account 101 1560 4130 100 00 100 00 100 00 100 00 Line Item Account 101 0000 2012 191 25 191 25 191 25 191 25 Line Item Account 101 1560 4130 260 95 260 95 260 95 260 95 Page 3 283 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle betroa Ck 135527 01 31 08 Inv 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 30 08 2008 Subscription Inv 01302008 Total Ck 135527 Tota betroa BIELHELE Ck 135528 01 31 08 Inv 01282008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 28 08 Refund Defensive Driving 2 8 08 Inv 01282008 Total Ck 135528 Total BIELHELE borsta Ck 135529 01 31 08 Inv 97451495 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 14 08 Fuseholder midget TO Fuse Inv 97451495 Total Ck 135529 Total borsta BOYTRU Ck 135479 Inv 158362 Line Item Date 01 08 08 Inv 158362 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description Gasket Inv 158362XI Line Item Date 01 08 08 Inv 158362XI Line Item Description Gasket Total Inv 159417 Line Item Date 01 11 08 Inv 159417 Total Line Item Description Refill Wip Ck 135479 Total BOYTRU Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount Line Item Account 101 1320 4360 24 95 24 95 24 95 24 95 Line Item Account 101 1560 3637 14 00 14 00 14 00 14 00 Line Item Account 101 1320 4 20 225 25 225 25 225 25 225 25 Line Item Account 101 1320 4140 10 96 10 96 Line Item Account 101 1320 4 40 36 32 36 32 Line Item Account 101 1320 4140 16 74 16 74 64 02 64 02 Page 4 284 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielIe Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 0 08 08 33 Amount CARGIL Ck 135460 01 24 08 ny 2090789 Line Item Date Line tern Description 12 28 07 Bulk Ice Control ny 2090789 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4150 6 353 58 6 353 58 nY 2093715 Line Item Date Line tern Description 12 31 07 Bulk Ice Control InY 2093715 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4150 4 693 52 4 693 52 ny 2095499 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 Bulk Ice Control Iny 2095499 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4150 1 897 29 1 897 29 Ck 135460 Total 12 944 39 Ck 135530 01 31 08 ny 2111457 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 15 08 Bulk Ice Control Iny 2111457 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4150 6 222 62 6 222 62 Ck 135530 Total 6 222 62 CARGIL 19 167 01 CARLIC Ck 135480 01 24 08 Iny 01 172008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 17 08 Water Craft Licenses Lake Ann Boats ny 01172008 Total Line Item Account 101 1540 4300 100 00 100 00 Ck 135480 Total 100 00 CARLIC 100 00 CARTRE Ck 135461 01 24 08 ny SHERIOOI032 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 Police Contract OT 4th Qtr 2007 Iny SHERIOOI032 Total Line Item Account 101 1210 4300 14 633 36 14 633 36 Ck 35461 Total 14 633 36 Ck 135481 01 24 08 InY 01172008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 1 7 08 Copies of Recent Changes ny 01172008 Total Line Item Account 101 1150 4300 25 50 25 50 Ck 135481 Total 25 50 Page 5 285 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 CARTRE Amount 14 658 86 ciabel Ck 135531 InY 101 Line Item Date 01 15 08 Iny 101 Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description Meals Line Item Account 101 1220 4370 153 89 153 89 Ck 135531 Total 153 89 cia bel 153 89 corexp Account 101 1170 4110 Ck 135482 01 24 08 InY 84350616 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 11 08 Ribn calc nyl bk rd Iny 84350616 Total Line Item Account 101 1170 4110 39 36 39 36 Ck 135482 Total 39 36 Ck 135532 01 31 08 Iny 84307702 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 1 0 08 wastebasket organizer calc tape mark Iny 84307702 Total Line Item Account 101 1 70 411 0 213 97 213 97 Iny 84307703 Line Item Date 01 10 08 Iny 84307703 Line Item Description pen blpt ret med bk Total Line Item Account 101 1170 4110 17 24 17 24 InY 84514795 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 17 08 Pad Corr Fluid binding sharpies Iny 84514795 Total Line Item Account 101 1170 4110 79 26 79 26 Ck 135532 Total 310 47 corexp 349 83 dahlmind Ck 135533 01 31 08 InY 01242008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 24 08 Refund Cxl Kid Smart Self Denfense InY 01242008 Total Line Item Account 10 1 I 73 I 3636 34 00 34 00 Ck 135533 Total 34 00 dahlmind 34 00 del too Ck 135534 Iny 86792 Line Item Date 01 15 08 01 31 08 Line Item Description Mini Air Reg Gauge 10 Ton porta POW Line Item Account 101 1370 4260 258 18 Page 6 286 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detai Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 ny 86792 Total Amount 258 18 Ck 135534 Total 258 18 de too 258 18 dencus Ck 135535 01 31 08 ny 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 30 08 RIse Asbuilt Escrow 6915 Lucy Ridge Ln nY 01302008 Total Line Item Account 815 8226 2024 1 500 00 1 500 00 Ck 135535 Total 1 500 00 dencus 1 500 00 EARAND Ck 135483 01 24 08 nY 0080991 Line tern Date Line Item Description 0 10 08 30 x 30 Stop VIP InY 0080991 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4560 913 03 913 03 ny 0081022 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 10 08 6 Street Sign Plates H I P nY 0081022 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4560 47 31 47 31 Ck 135483 Total 960 34 EARAND 960 34 emeaut Ck 135536 01 31 08 Iny JER122007 4 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 16 08 Stingray Electronics Box PSE Iny JER122007 4 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4140 94 74 94 74 Ck 135536 Total 94 74 emeaut 94 74 EMPGRO Ck 135462 01 24 08 nY 12312007 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 2007 Soda Reimb to Emp Group Fund 12 31 07 2007 Soda Reimb to Emp Group Fund 12 31 07 2007 Soda Reimb to Emp Group Fund 12 3 07 2007 Soda Reimb to Emp Group Fund 12 31 07 2007 Soda Reimb to Emp Group Fund 12 31 07 2007 Soda Reimb to Emp Group Fund 12 31 07 2007 Soda Reimb to Emp Group Fund ny 12312007 Total Line Item Account 720 7201 4370 101 1510 4370 101 1410 4370 720 0000 4370 101 1110 4370 101 1120 4370 101 1110 4370 50 00 80 00 120 00 132 00 132 00 140 00 264 00 918 00 Page 7 287 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Ck 135462 Total Amount 918 00 EMPGRO 918 00 ESCTEL Ck 135463 01 24 08 Inv 120243336 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 30 07 Annual Support Interel PBX VoicemaiI Inv 120243336 Total Line Item Account 10 I 1160 4300 8 651 51 8 651 51 Ck 135463 Total 8 651 51 ESCTEL 8 651 51 exeoce Ck 135537 Inv 18652 Line Item Date 01 24 08 Inv 18652 Total 01 3 108 Line Item Description Maple Leaf Award logo Line Item Account 101 1110 4375 130 41 130 41 Ck 135537 Total 130 41 exeoce 130 41 facmot Ck 135538 0 131 08 Inv 1 2758960 Line Item Date Line Item Description 1211 0 07 MIS Core Inv 1 2758960 Total Inv 1 2764689 Line Item Date Line Item Description 1211 8 07 MIS Core Inv 1 2764689 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4120 12 00 12 00 Line Item Account 101 I 320 4140 12 00 12 00 Line Item Account 101 1220 4140 103 13 103 13 Line Item Account 10 1 1320 4140 34 64 34 64 Line Item Account 101 1320 4120 38 35 38 35 Line Item Account 101 1320 4140 6 00 6 00 Inv 1 2764690 Line Item Date Line Item Description 1211 8 07 Pro Batt Inv I 2764690 Total Inv I 2771939 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 02 08 Pro Battery Inv 1 2771939 Total Inv I 2771940 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 02 08 credit for defective batter Inv 1 2771940 Total Inv 1 2774722 Line Item Date Line Item Description 0 107 08 MIS Core Inv 1 2774722 Total Page 8 288 CITY OF CHANHAS User danieJle Iny 1 2779205 Line Item Date 01 14 08 Iny 1 2779205 Line Item Description MIS Core Total InY I 2781488 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 17 08 Adjuster ball joint 504 Iny 1 2781488 Total Iny 1 2783724 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 21108 MIS Core Iny 1 2783724 Total Iny 1 2783725 Line Item Date 01121 08 Iny 1 2783725 Line Item Description pro batt PP54 Total InY I 2784126 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 22 08 fuel pump 504 Iny 1 2784126 Tota InY 41 111153 Line Item Date 01 17 08 InY 41 111153 Iny 6 1006565 Line Item Date 01 17 08 InY 6 I006565 Line Item Description MTC 504 Tota Line Item Description frt susp Iwr arm 504 Tota Iny 6 1006967 Line Item Date Line Item Description 0 18 08 spark plug 504 InY 6 1006967 Total Iny 6 1007794 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 22 08 strainer 424 Iny 6 1007794 Total Iny 6 I 007961 Line Item Date 01 23 08 InY 6 I007961 InY 6 I008155 Line Item Date 01 23 08 Iny 6 1008155 Iny 6 999189 Line Item Date 12 9 07 Line Item Description alternator II 0 Total Line Item Description fuel pump 424 Total Line Item Description starter PP36 Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01108 08 33 Amount Line Item Account 10 I 1320 4 I 20 6 00 6 00 Line Item Account 101 1310 4140 162 16 162 16 Line Item Account 101 1550 4120 6 00 6 00 Line Item Account 101 1550 4120 120 13 120 13 Line Item Account 101 1310 4140 240 21 240 21 Line Item Account 10 1 131 0 4140 26 33 26 33 Line Item Account 101 1310 4140 179 18 179 18 Line Item Account 101 1310 4140 89 37 89 37 Line Item Account 101 1550 4140 97 38 97 38 Line Item Account 101 1320 4140 121 13 121 13 Line Item Account 101 1550 4140 51 96 51 96 Line Item Account 101 1320 4140 157 65 Page 9 289 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Inv 6 999189 Total Amount 157 65 Inv 6 999190 Line Item Date Line Item Description 1211 9 07 starter PP36 Inv 6 999190 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4140 27 50 27 50 Ck 135538 Total 890 84 facmot 890 84 firres Ck 135539 01 31 08 Inv 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 30 08 Subscription FIRERESCUE Magazine Inv 01302008 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4360 39 95 39 95 Ck 135539 Total 39 95 firres 39 95 forame Ck 135540 01 31 08 Inv 01293444 Line Item Date Line Item Description 0111 5 08 Orifice Update Kit Inv 01293444 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4140 23 90 23 90 Inv 01293445 Line Item Date 01 15 08 01115 08 01115 08 Inv 01293445 Line Item Description barstock swivel adapter hex plug barstock swivel adapter hex plug barstock swivel adapter hex plug Total Line Item Account 101 1550 4120 700 0000 4120 101 1320 4120 25 27 25 28 25 28 75 83 Ck 135540 Total 99 73 forame 99 73 galls Ck 135464 0 I 24 08 Inv 5912486200018 Line Item Date Line Item Description 11 03 07 Blk Bw N Key Strap W Flap Inv 5912486200018 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4240 21 98 21 98 Ck 135464 Total 21 98 galls 21 98 gopsig Ck 135465 01 24 08 Inv 00073940 Line Item Date Line Item Description 1211 9 07 Alum 18x6 Horiz Rect 24x6 Horiz Rect Inv 00073940 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4560 159 43 159 43 Page 10 290 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Ck 135465 Total Ck 135541 01 31 08 InY 00073995 Line Item Date Line Item Description o I II 8 08 Portable Base 5 Pole Iny 00073995 Total Ck 13554 I Total gopsig GSDlR Ck 135484 01 24 08 Iny 242323 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 09 08 36x50 241b Coated IJ Bond 717 Iny 242323 Total Ck 135484 Total GSDlR HANTHO Ck 135485 Iny 16846 Line Item Date 01 07 08 Iny 16846 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description Martinka Easement Preparation Ck 135485 Total HANTHO HAWCHE Ck 135516 01 31 08 1nY 1145046 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 Chlorine Cylinder Iny 1145046 Total Ck 135516 Total HA WCHE HITECH Ck 135542 01 31 08 InY 64966763 001 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 25 08 Parka Hood InY 64966763 001 Total Ck 135542 Total HITECH Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount 159 43 Line Item Account 101 1320 4560 1 215 81 1 215 81 1 215 81 1 375 24 Line Item Account 101 1170 4110 109 88 109 88 109 88 109 88 Line Item Account 101 1310 4300 26 00 26 00 26 00 26 00 Line Item Account 700 7019 4160 85 00 85 00 85 00 85 00 Line Item Account 101 1220 4240 138 93 138 93 138 93 138 93 Page 11 291 CITY OF CHANHAS User danieIle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount hoothr Ck 135543 01 31 08 InY OI072008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 07 08 Stocking Hats Hats w logo Iny 0 I 072008 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4240 192 00 192 00 InY 01112008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 11 08 Jacket w Fire Logo Name Iny 01112008 Total Line Item Account 10 1 1220 4240 10 65 10 65 Iny 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 30 08 Shirts InY 01302008 Total Line Item Account 701 0000 4240 42 60 42 60 Ck 135543 Total 245 25 hoothr 245 25 ICI 1ART Ck 135544 Iny Line Item Date 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 Iny Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description PR Batch 401 22008 ICMA PR Batch 401 22008 ICMA PR Batch 40122008 ICMA Line Item Account 210 0000 2009 720 0000 2009 101 0000 2009 40 00 100 00 2 039 09 2 179 09 Ck 135544 Total 2 179 09 ICI 1ART 2 179 09 johnroby Ck 135486 01 24 08 InY 01112008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 11 08 Refund Partial Cat Reg Spayed 1 50 Iny 01112008 Total Line Item Account 101 1260 3205 4 50 4 50 Ck 135486 Total 4 50 johnroby 4 50 katfue Ck 135517 01 31 08 Iny 203076 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 Oil Master Bulk Iny 203076 Total Line Item Account 101 1370 4170 1 677 38 1 677 38 Ck 135517 Total 1 677 38 Ck 135545 01 31 08 Iny 203999 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 09 08 Oil Master Bulk Line Item Account 101 1370 4170 149 10 Page 12 292 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 0J 08 08 33 Inv 203999 Total Amount 149 10 Ck 135545 Total 149 10 katfue 1 826 48 keusmatt Ck 135546 01 3J 08 Inv 01252008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 25 08 Intemate Fire Pump Apparatus calculato Inv 01252008 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4370 81 33 81 33 Ck 135546 Total 81 33 keusmatt 81 33 KIMHOR Ck 135518 01 3J 08 Inv 3295342 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 30 07 2005 Musa Area Expansion Inv 3295342 Total Line Item Account 602 6014 4300 5 916 14 5 916 14 Inv 3295345 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 30 07 2007 St Improvement Project Inv 3295345 Total Line Item Account 601 6017 4752 8 731 75 8 731 75 Inv 3295346 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 30 07 2008 Street Improvement Inv 3295346 Total Line Item Account 601 6018 4752 44 093 60 44 093 60 Ck 135518 Total 58 741 49 kimhor 58 741 49 KRAAND Ck 135547 0J 3J 08 Inv 01292008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 29 08 Refund Overpymt Jimmy John s Plan Case Inv 01292008 Total Line Item Account 101 1420 4901 200 00 200 00 Ck 135547 Total 200 00 KRAAND 200 00 LANEQl Ck 135548 Inv 177685 Line Item Date o J 22 08 Inv 177685 Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description Dipstick 318 Line Item Account 700 0000 4120 2 98 2 98 Ck 135548 Total 2 98 Page 13 293 CITY OF CHANHAS User danieJle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 LANEQl Amount 2 98 larslorr Ck 135487 01 24 08 Iny 01222008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 22 08 BCA School Hutchinson Reimb InY 01222008 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4370 131 18 131 18 Ck 135487 Total 131 18 larslorr 131 18 leodan Ck 135549 Inv 268983 Line Item Date 01 07 08 InY 268983 Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description Dance Costumes Line Item Account 101 1535 4130 1 877 68 1 877 68 Ck 135549 Total 1 877 68 leodan 1 877 68 LUNBRO Ck 135488 01 24 08 Iny 01172008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 17 08 RIse Asbuilt Escrow 7723 Ridgeyiew Way Iny 01172008 Total Line Item Account 815 8226 2024 1 500 00 1 500 00 Ck 135488 Total 1 500 00 LUNBRO 1 500 00 Iymlum Ck 135489 InY 243163 Line Item Date 01 14 08 Iny 243163 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description 4x8 1 2 AC Ext Sanded Fir Ply Line Item Account 101 1170 4510 41 75 41 75 Ck 135489 Total 41 75 Iymlum 41 75 MACEQU Ck 135550 01 31 08 Iny 2081057 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 1 6 08 Bushing weldment filter shoe runner Iny 2081057 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4120 1 042 00 1 042 00 Iny 2081058 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 16 08 Ice Curb Guard 6 Inv 2081058 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4140 6 I 1 05 6 I 1 05 Page 14 294 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Ck 135550 Total Amount 1 653 05 MACEQU 1 653 05 MASS Ck 135490 01 24 08 InY 01232008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 23 08 MASS Annual Dues 01 23 08 MASS Annual Spring Conference InY 01232008 Total Line Item Account 101 1560 4360 101 1560 4370 15 00 125 00 140 00 Ck 135490 Total 140 00 MASS 140 00 mcrekim Ck 135551 01 31 08 InY 01242008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 24 08 Reimb Cxl Class Kid Smart Self Defense 01 24 08 Reimb Cxl Class Kid Smart Self Defense Iny 01242008 Total Line Item Account 101 1731 3636 101 1731 3636 34 00 34 00 68 00 Ck 135551 Total 68 00 mcrekim 68 00 MEFIRE Ck 135552 01 31 08 Iny 01282008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 28 08 2008 Dues G Geske Iny 01282008 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4360 100 00 100 00 Ck 135552 Total 100 00 MEFIRE 100 00 metfor Ck 135553 01 31 08 InY 457041 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 17 08 CONN 703 InY 457041 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4140 7 19 7 19 Iny 457051 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 21 08 Tube AS 504 InY 457051 Total Line Item Account IOI I3IO 4140 421 20 421 20 Ck 135553 Total 428 39 metfor 428 39 Page 15 295 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount MNARB Ck 135491 01 24 08 Inv 01232008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 23 08 MSA Membership Inv 0 I 232008 Total Ck 135491 Total MNARB MNCHlL Ck 135554 Inv Line Item Date 01 28 08 01 28 08 Inv Total Ck 135554 Total MNCHlL Line Item Account 720 7202 4360 40 00 40 00 40 00 40 00 01 31 08 Line Item Description PR Batch 401 22008 Garnishment PR Batch 401 2 2008 Garnishment Line Item Account 701 0000 2006 700 0000 2006 44 96 275 42 320 38 320 38 320 38 MNHOR Ck 135492 01 24 08 Inv 01232008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 23 08 Minnesota Green Program Membership Inv 01232008 Total Ck 135492 Total MNHOR Line Item Account 720 0000 4360 50 00 50 00 50 00 50 00 MNIAAI Ck 135555 01 31 08 Inv 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 30 08 Arson Registration M Litfin Inv 01302008 Total MNLlFE Ck 135493 01 24 08 Inv 01232008 Line Item Date 01 23 08 01 23 08 01 23 08 01 23 08 01 23 08 01 23 08 01 23 08 01 23 08 01 23 08 01 23 08 Ck 135555 Total MNIAAI Line Item Account 101 1220 4370 225 00 225 00 225 00 225 00 Line Item Description Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Feb 08 Life Insurance Line Item Account 101 1530 4040 210 0000 2011 101 1430 4040 720 7201 4040 720 7202 4040 101 1700 4040 101 1170 4040 101 1210 4040 210 0000 4040 101 1600 4040 10 32 0 17 3 78 4 92 4 92 4 94 11 76 14 16 15 42 19 78 Page 16 296 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 0J 08 08 33 0J 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 0J 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 0J 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 0J 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 0J 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 0J 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 0J 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 01 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance 0J 23 08 Feb 08 Life Insurance Iny 01232008 Total 101 1520 4040 720 0000 4040 101 1160 4040 101 1220 4040 101 1130 4040 700 0000 20 I I 701 0000 201 I 101 1370 4040 701 0000 4040 101 1120 4040 101 1420 4040 700 0000 4040 101 1310 4040 101 1550 4040 101 1320 4040 10 1 125 0 4040 101 0000 2011 Amount 21 60 27 84 30 24 30 78 38 59 39 14 39 14 41 75 60 03 66 66 67 50 72 03 84 30 10 1 82 104 46 113 52 500 70 1 509 63 Ck 135493 Total 1 509 63 MNLIFE 1 509 63 mnucfu Ck 135466 0J 24 08 InY 12312007 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 G KronmilIer Unemployment Insurance Iny 12312007 Total Line Item Account 10 1 1180 4060 12 70 12 70 Ck 135466 Total 12 70 mnucfu 12 70 MRPA Ck 135494 Iny 5564 Line Item Date 01 17 08 Iny 5564 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description Rec Center Manager Job Posting Line Item Account 101 1530 4300 100 00 100 00 Ck 135494 Total 100 00 Ck 135556 Iny 5570 Line Item Date 01 25 08 Iny 5570 Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description Annual General Meeting Registration Line Item Account 101 1520 4370 90 00 90 00 Ck 135556 Total 90 00 MRPA 190 00 MSRS Ck 135557 Iny Line Item Date 01 28 08 01 28 08 0J 31 08 Line Item Description PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 05 Emp1r PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 3 Emplr Line Item Account 210 0000 2016 700 0000 2016 0 23 0 28 Page 17 297 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 Inv Total Ck 135557 Total MSRS Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Post Health 3 Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 05 Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 05 Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 05 Emplr PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Post Health I Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health I Emplr PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Post Health I Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 5 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 3 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 3 PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health I Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 5 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 5 PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 2 Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 2 Emplr PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Post Health 5 Emplr PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Post Health 05 Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 3 Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 5 PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Ret Health 1 PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Ret Health 1 PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Post Health 2 Emplr PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Ret Health 1 PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health I Emplr PR Batch 401 22008 Post Health 7 Emplr PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Ret Health 1 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 2 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 2 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 5 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 3 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 5 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 2 PR Batch 401 22008 Ret Health 7 PR Batch 40 I 2 2008 Ret Health 1 701 0000 2016 700 0000 2016 701 0000 2016 720 0000 2016 2 I 0 0000 20 16 720 0000 2016 701 0000 2016 210 0000 2016 700 0000 2016 701 0000 2016 700 0000 2016 700 0000 2016 701 0000 2016 701 0000 2016 700 0000 2016 101 0000 2016 101 0000 2016 101 0000 2016 720 0000 2016 210 0000 2016 720 0000 2016 101 0000 2016 701 0000 2016 10 1 0000 20 16 101 0000 2016 700 0000 2016 701 0000 2016 700 0000 2016 10 1 0000 20 16 101 0000 2016 101 0000 2016 101 0000 2016 10 1 0000 2016 101 0000 2016 Amount 0 28 0 52 0 53 1 38 1 50 1 94 2 64 2 91 3 72 3 72 4 28 6 95 6 95 7 05 11 49 11 53 11 80 11 81 18 08 19 63 25 37 33 27 34 44 41 17 41 82 55 84 91 91 150 41 150 78 154 35 161 99 434 95 546 68 560 98 2 613 18 2 613 18 2 613 18 MSSA Ck 135558 01 31 08 Inv 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 30 08 Membership M Wegler Inv 01302008 Total mvec Ck 135559 01 31 08 Inv 01302008 Line Item Date 01 30 08 01 30 08 01 30 08 01 30 08 01 30 08 Ck 135558 Total MSSA Line Item Account 101 1320 4360 35 00 35 00 35 00 35 00 Line Item Description Jan 08 Electric Service Jan 08 Electric Service Jan 08 Electric Service Jan 08 Electric Service Jan 08 Electric Service Line Item Account 101 1600 4320 701 0000 4320 701 0000 4320 101 1350 4320 101 1350 4320 11 09 17 09 25 67 26 52 37 67 Page 18 298 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 01 30 08 Jan 08 Electric Service 01 30 08 Jan 08 Electric Service 01 30 08 Jan 08 Electric Service 01 30 08 Jan 08 Electric Service 01 30 08 Jan 08 Electric Service 0I 30 08 Jan 08 Electric Service Inv 01302008 Total 101 1350 4320 701 0000 4320 101 1350 4320 101 1350 4320 101 1350 4320 101 1350 4320 Amount 38 52 55 67 70 25 71 10 76 24 120 82 550 64 Ck 135559 Total 550 64 mvec 550 64 nagapp Ck 135495 Inv 14498 Line Item Date 01 14 08 Inv 14498 Total o I 24 08 Line Item Description XX Lake Drive Rev Site Size Area w Owner Line Item Account 101 1310 4300 300 00 300 00 Ck 135495 Total 300 00 nagapp 300 00 napa Ck 135560 01 3I 08 Inv 01252008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 25 08 Penetrant Inv 01252008 Total Line Item Account 700 0000 4150 76 55 76 55 Ck 135560 Total 76 55 napa 76 55 NATARB Ck 135496 0I 24 08 Inv 01232008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 23 08 National Arbor Day Foundation Membership Inv 01232008 Total Line Item Account 720 7202 4360 15 00 15 00 Ck 135496 Total 15 00 NATARB 15 00 NATRET Ck 135561 Inv Line Item Date 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 o I 28 08 Inv Total 01 3 I 08 Line Item Description PR Batch 401 22008 Nationwide Retirement PR Batch 401 22008 Nationwide Retirement PR Batch 401 22008 Nationwide Retirement PR Batch 401 22008 Nationwide Retirement Line Item Account 720 0000 2009 701 0000 2009 700 0000 2009 10 1 0000 2009 50 00 290 21 426 76 4 435 12 5 202 09 Ck 135561 Total 5 202 09 Page 19 299 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 NATRET Amount 5 202 09 NCPERS Ck 135562 Iny Line Item Date 01 28 08 01 28 08 01 28 08 Iny Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description PR Batch 401 22008 NCPERS life insurance PR Batch 401 22008 NCPERS life insurance PR Batch 401 22008 NCPERS life insurance Line Item Account 701 0000 2011 700 0000 2011 101 0000 2011 1 59 1 61 12 80 16 00 Ck 135562 Total 16 00 NCPERS 16 00 nextel Ck 135563 01 31 08 Iny 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges 01 30 08 January 08 Cell Phone Charges InY 01302008 Total Line Item Account 101 1530 4310 101 1170 4310 101 1130 4310 101 1260 4310 720 0000 4310 10 1 1600 4310 701 0000 4310 101 1310 4310 101 1520 4310 101 1370 4310 700 0000 4310 101 1160 4310 101 1320 4310 10 1 1220 4310 101 1120 4310 101 1250 4310 101 1550 4310 20 25 20 25 20 25 20 46 41 15 82 27 92 77 101 46 126 62 177 34 219 22 238 97 240 97 259 64 260 79 312 35 379 62 2 614 38 Ck 135563 Total 2 614 38 nextel 2 614 38 OFFMAX Account 101 1170 4110 Ck 135467 01 24 08 InY 12312007 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 Steel Storage Cabinet 15x3 Iny 12312007 Total Line Item Account 101 1130 4703 117 14 117 14 Ck 135467 Total 117 14 OFFMAX 117 14 OLSFIR Ck 135564 InY 47176 Line Item Date 0111 1 08 01 31 08 Line Item Description Added Sprinkler Head Line Item Account 210 0000 4300 437 00 Page 20 300 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Inv 47176 Total Ck 135564 Total OLSFIR ourdes Ck 135565 Inv 929694 Line Item Date 01 14 08 Inv 929694 Total Ck 135565 Total ourdes palwes Ck 135566 Inv 5310 Line Item Date 0I 21 08 Inv 5310 Total Ck 135566 Total palwes PeaHea Ck 135468 Inv 2154 Line Item Date 12 27 07 Inv 2154 Total Ck 135468 Total PeaHea 0I 3 I 08 Line Item Description Awards Merit Commendation Bar o I 3 I 08 Line Item Description Labor truck charge misc materials 01 24 08 Line Item Description Venting Supplies piertara Ck 135567 0I 31 08 Inv 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 0I 30 08 Refund Soccer Preschool 2 Inv 01302008 Total Ck 135567 Total piertara POST Ck 135568 0 I 3 I 08 Inv 01302008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 30 08 Utility Bill Postage 0I 30 08 Utility Bill Postage Inv 01302008 Total Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount 437 00 437 00 437 00 Line Item Account 101 1220 4375 78 95 78 95 78 95 78 95 Line Item Account 101 1370 4510 412 00 412 00 412 00 412 00 Line Item Account 210 0000 4300 780 00 780 00 780 00 780 00 Line Item Account 101 1710 3636 28 00 28 00 28 00 28 00 Line Item Account 700 0000 4330 701 0000 4330 342 79 342 79 685 58 Page 21 301 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Ck 135568 Total POST prdia Ck 135569 Inv 58585 Line Item Date 01 17 08 Inv 58585 Total Ck 135569 Total prdia PUMMET Ck 135570 Inv 257610 Line Item Date 01 17 08 Inv 257610 Total Ck 135570 Total PUMMET quano Ck 135571 Inv 19477 Line Item Date 01 21 08 Inv 19477 Total Ck 135571 Total quano qualcon Ck 135497 Inv 161 Line Item Date 01 11 08 Inv 161 Total Inv 163 Line Item Date 01 11 08 Inv 163 Total Ck 135497 Total qualcon reedkati Ck 135572 01 31 08 1nv 01302008 Line Item Date 01 30 08 Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount 685 58 685 58 01 31 08 Line Item Description Supreme asphalt green concrete Line Item Account 420 0000 4751 246 00 246 00 246 00 246 00 01 31 08 Line Item Description EM5 Meter Flex Line Item Account 101 1370 4150 639 00 639 00 639 00 639 00 01 31 08 Line Item Description Flygt module mileage instalIation lab Line Item Account 701 0000 4553 787 52 787 52 787 52 787 52 01 24 08 Line Item Description WTP Upgrades Hardware Line Item Account 700 7019 4550 2 811 60 2 811 60 Line Item Description Programming Services WTP Upgrades Line Item Account 700 7019 4550 4 000 00 4 000 00 6 81 60 6 8 t 1 60 Line Item Description Reimb Mileage GFOA Conference Line Item Account 101 1130 4370 44 44 Page 22 302 CITY OFCHANHAS User danieIle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 JnY 0 302008 Total Amount 44 44 Ck J 35572 Total 44 44 reedkati 44 44 RelOff Ck 135498 OI 24 08 Jny FXQ960000 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 J 6 08 Cascade Copy Paper Jny FXQ960000 Total Line Jtem Account 101 1170 4110 65 37 65 37 Ck 135498 Total 65 37 RelOff 65 37 ROWEKA Ck 35469 OI 24 08 JnY 2007J93 Line Item Date Line Item Description 11 09 07 Spartial Analyst WSRI ArcPad JnY 2007193 Total Line Item Account 400 4117 4703 2 960 70 2 960 70 Ck 135469 Total 2 960 70 ROWEKA 2 960 70 rylhom Ck 135519 OI 3I 08 Jny 12312007 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 3 1 07 Pedestrian Bridge Preserve at Bluff Cree Jny 12312007 Total Line Item Account 410 0000 470 I 86 626 64 86 626 64 Ck 135519 Total 86 626 64 ryJhom 86 626 64 satshe Ck 135573 01 3I 08 Jny RJ061 09 Line Jtem Date Line Item Description OI I4 08 Portable Warming House N Lotus City Ctr Jny RI06109 Total Line Item Account 101 1617 4410 682 67 682 67 Ck 135573 Total 682 67 satshe 682 67 SCOTT Ck 135470 OI 24 08 JnY 00082144 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 27 07 LED Light Stick Necklace Set Up chgs Jny 00082144 Total Line Item Account 101 1210 3807 1 294 66 1 294 66 Page 23 303 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Ck 135470 Total Amount 1 294 66 SCOTT 1 294 66 SENSYS Ck 135499 Iny 564075 Line Item Date 01 22 08 Iny 564075 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description Chan Library Monitoring SyCS Feb 08 Line Item Account 10 1 1190 4300 52 86 52 86 InY 565894 Line Item Date 01 23 08 Iny 565894 Total Line Item Description Ann Fire Alarm Testllnsp City Hall Line Item Account 101 1170 4300 141 09 141 09 Ck 135499 Total 193 95 sensys 193 95 SHAGRA Ck 135471 Iny 9854 Line Item Date 12 26 07 12 26 07 Iny 9854 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description 12 26 07 1110 08 Coarsed Washed Sand 12 26 07 1 10 08 Coarsed Washed Sand Line Item Account 101 1320 4150 101 1320 4150 44 61 892 20 847 59 Ck 135471 Total 847 59 SHAGRA 847 59 SHUSUP Ck 135574 1ny 3485 Line Item Date 0111 8 08 Iny 3485 Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description Galy Pipe Line Item Account 101 1170 4530 8 13 8 13 Ck 135574 Total 8 13 SHUSUP 8 13 SPRPCS Ck 135500 01 24 08 InY 01232008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 23 08 Wireless Internet Ian 08 01 23 08 Wireless Internet Ian 08 01 23 08 Wireless Internet Ian 08 InY 01232008 Total Line Item Account 101 1160 4310 700 0000 4310 70 I 0000 431 0 41 70 83 40 92 41 217 51 Ck 135500 Total 217 51 Ck 135575 01 31 08 InY 01072008 Line Item Date 01 07 08 Line Item Description Telephone Charges Line Item Account 70 I 0000 43 I 0 10 51 Page 24 304 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 01 07 08 Telephone Charges InY OI072008 Total 700 0000 4310 Amount 10 52 21 03 Ck 135575 Total 21 03 SPRPCS 238 54 SPSCOM Ck 135501 01 24 08 Iny SI785166 Line Item Date Line Item Description 011 1 08 FIP Inlet yalye stop tee etc 011 1 08 FIP Inlet yalye stop tee etc Iny S 1785166 Total Line Item Account 101 1170 4510 101 1170 4510 0 52 27 45 26 93 Ck 135501 Total 26 93 SPSCOM 26 93 statri Ck 135502 01 24 08 InY 01232008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 23 08 Subscription Renewal InY 01232008 Total Line Item Account 101 1530 4360 223 08 223 08 Ck 135502 Total 223 08 statri 223 08 stekop Ck 135576 01 31 08 Iny 01292008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 29 08 RIse As Built Escrow 3611 Ironwood Road Iny 01292008 Total Line Item Account 815 8226 2024 1 500 00 1 500 00 Ck 135576 Total 1 500 00 stekop 1 500 00 STREIC Ck 135577 01 31 08 Iny 1490728 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 22 08 Battery battery pack cord Iny 1490728 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4530 71 33 71 33 InY 1491356 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 24 08 Battery battery pack charge cord Iny 1491356 Total Line Item Account 101 1220 4530 175 65 175 65 Ck 135577 Total 246 98 STREIC 246 98 Page 25 305 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle SUBCHE Ck 135578 Inv 527197 Line Item Date o Jl22 08 Inv 527197 Total OJl31 08 Line Item Description Module AS 3 90 424 Inv 527270 Line Item Date o Jl23 08 Inv 527270 Total Line Item Description Sender 424 Inv 527900 1 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 28 08 Belt Inv 527900 1 Total Ck 135578 Total SUBCHE supwir Ck 135503 Inv 20079 Line Item Date OJl17 08 Inv 20079 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description Replace Demo Handset Ck 135503 Total supwir target Ck 135504 01 24 08 Inv 01182008 Line tern Date Line Item Description OIl 8 08 Basicware Supplies nv 01182008 Tota Ck 135504 Total target tecgra Ck 135579 01 3 08 Inv 6510011 Line tern Date Line tern Description 01 25 08 Be s 4 names nv 6510011 Total Ck 135579 Total tecgra Accounts Payable Check Detai Report Detai Printed 02 0Jl08 08 33 Amount Line Item Account 101 1550 4140 44 55 44 55 Line Item Account 101 1550 4140 326 36 326 36 Line Item Account 0 1550 4 40 40 02 40 02 410 93 410 93 Line Item Account 101 1160 4530 207 66 207 66 207 66 207 66 Line Item Account 101 1170 4110 21 80 21 80 21 80 21 80 Line Item Account 101 1170 4110 222 84 222 84 222 84 222 84 Page 26 306 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle TFSTRIKE Ck 135580 Inv 13653 Line Item Date OIl 8 08 Inv 13653 Total Ck 135580 Total TFSTRIKE TOLGAS Ck 135505 Inv 201557 Line Item Date 01 09 08 Inv 201557 Total Ck 135505 Tota Ck 135581 Inv 203277 Line Item Date 01 22 08 01 22 08 Inv 203277 Tota Ck 35581 Tota TOLGAS TRCOM Ck 135472 Inv 21 108 Line Item Date 121 5 07 Inv 21108 Total Ck 135472 Total TRCOM TWIGAR Ck 135582 Inv 290442 Line Item Date OIl 7 08 Inv 290442 Total Ck 135582 Total TWIGAR UNIWAY Ck 135583 Inv Line Item Date 01 28 08 Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount 01 31 08 Line Item Description A V Room Paint interior exterior wall Line Item Account 210 0000 4300 475 00 475 00 475 00 475 00 01 24 08 Line Item Description assy cutting tiea tip Line Item Account 101 1550 4150 47 99 47 99 47 99 01 31 08 Line Item Description Plasma Nozzle electrode gouging Plasma Nozzle electrode gouging Line Item Account 101 1320 4150 101 1550 4150 49 47 49 47 98 94 98 94 146 93 01 24 08 Line Item Description Permit Works Lic Plan Insp Renewal Line Item Account 10 1 1160 4300 2 4 6 01 2 416 01 2 416 01 2 416 01 01 31 08 Line Item Description Door 4 LW Torsion Spring Plugs cables Line Item Account 101 1370 4510 1 463 93 1 463 93 1 463 93 1 463 93 01 3 08 Line Item Description PR Batch 401 22008 United Way Line Item Account 720 0000 2006 5 00 Page 27 307 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 01 28 08 Inv Total PR Batch 401 22008 United Way 10 1 0000 2006 Amount 29 40 34 40 Ck 135583 Total 34 40 UNIW A Y 34 40 VERIZO Ck 135506 01 24 08 Inv 01102008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01110 08 Jan CeIl Phone Service 480566654 00001 01 10 08 Jan CeIl Phone Service 280565597 00001 Inv 01102008 Total Line Item Account 10 1 1220 4310 101 1420 4310 2 31 13 11 15 42 Ck 135506 Total 15 42 VERIZO 15 42 VisSew Ck 135473 Inv 8 Line Item Date 12 27 07 Inv 8 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description Sanitary Sewer Rehab Line Item Account 701 7013 4751 14 507 68 14 507 68 Ck 135473 Total 14 507 68 VisSew 14 507 68 wacdod Ck 135584 Inv 7110 Line Item Date 0111 7 08 Inv 7110 Total 01 31 08 Line Item Description motor blo resistor Line Item Account 101 1250 4140 117 45 117 45 Inv 7123 Line Item Date o I II 8 08 Inv 7123 Total Line Item Description Switch Line Item Account 10 1 1260 4140 11 80 11 80 Inv 7217 Line Item Date 01 25 08 Inv 72 I 7 Total Line Item Description Thrmostat 201 Line Item Account 101 1220 4140 33 23 33 23 Ck 135584 Total 162 48 WACDOD 162 48 wacfar Ck 135585 01 31 08 Inv KI8717 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 09 08 chain sprocket handlebar guard Inv K18717 Total Line Item Account 101 1550 4120 149 77 149 77 Page 28 308 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Ck 135585 Total Amount 149 77 wacfar 149 77 waydau Ck 135507 Inv 23676 Line Item Date 01 15 08 Inv 23676 Total 01 24 08 Line Item Description Replaced copper water piping Water Soft Line Item Account 101 1170 4510 430 69 430 69 Inv 23677 Line Item Date 01115 08 Inv 23677 Total Line Item Description Removed Existing Kitch Faucet Line Item Account 101 1220 4510 137 28 137 28 Ck 135507 Total 567 97 waydau 567 97 wolfor Ck 135520 01 31 08 Inv 12212007 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 21 07 Dance Costumes Acct 0636030 Inv 12212007 Total Line Item Account 101 1535 4130 1 731 00 1 731 00 Ck 135520 Total 1 731 00 wolfor 1 731 00 xcel Ck 135474 01 24 08 Inv 12152007 Line Item Date Line Item Description 1211 5 07 Dec Electric Charges 51 4341542 1 Inv 12152007 Total Line Item Account 101 1190 4320 2 795 86 2 795 86 Inv 12312007 Line Item Date Line Item Description 12 31 07 Dec Electricity Charges 51 6784000 6 12 31 07 Dec Electricity Charges 51 6260763 8 Inv 12312007 Total Line Item Account 700 0000 4320 700 0000 4320 126 55 7 465 33 7 591 88 Ck 135474 Total 10 387 74 Ck 135512 01 24 08 Inv 01122008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 0111 2 08 January 08 Electricity Charges 51 656560 Inv 01122008 Total Line Item Account 101 1550 4320 410 17 410 17 Inv 01222008 Line Item Date 01 22 08 01 22 08 01 22 08 01 22 08 01 22 08 Line Item Description January 2008 Electricity Charges January 2008 Electricity Charges January 2008 Electricity Charges January 2008 Electricity Charges January 2008 Electricity Charges Line Item Account 101 1551 4320 700 0000 4320 101 1350 4320 101 1370 4320 101 1220 4320 48 00 75 52 475 54 612 13 885 65 Page 29 309 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 01 22 08 January 2008 Electricity Charges 01 22 08 January 2008 Electricity Charges Inv 01222008 Total 101 1170 4320 701 0000 4320 Amount 3 016 03 5 361 14 10 474 01 Ck 135512 Total 10 884 18 Ck 135513 01 24 08 Inv 01232008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 23 08 Lift Station 3 Wire underground service Inv 01232008 Total Line Item Account 701 0000 4300 3 649 00 3 649 00 Ck 135513 Total 3 649 00 Ck 135586 01 31 08 Inv 01212008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 21 08 Jan 08 Electricity Charges 51 6689354 1 Inv 01212008 Total Line Item Account 101 1350 4320 110 45 110 45 Inv 01222008 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 22 08 Jan 08 Electricity Charges 51 6285959 6 01 22 08 Jan 08 Electricity Charges 5 I 6285960 9 01 22 08 Jan 08 Electricity Charges 51 5195542 1 Inv 01222008 Total Line Item Account 101 1600 4320 101 1600 4320 101 1350 4320 65 18 397 52 21 314 16 21 776 86 Ck 135586 Total 21 887 31 xcel 46 808 23 ZEPMAN Ck 135587 01 31 08 Inv 57286356 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 14 08 Zep 0 Shine Inv 57286356 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4120 161 13 161 13 Inv 57286759 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 1 6 08 High Press Hose Quick Inv 57286759 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4120 60 00 60 00 Ck 135587 Total 221 13 ZEPMAN 221 13 ZIEGLE Ck 135509 01 24 08 Inv PCOOlO46861 Line Item Date 01 09 08 Inv PCOOlO46861 Line Item Description Vee Belt Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4120 75 56 75 56 Ck 135509 Total 75 56 Page 30 310 CITY OF CHANHAS User danielle Accounts Payable Check Detail Report Detail Printed 02 01 08 08 33 Amount Ck 135588 01 31 08 Inv PCOOI047778 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 12 08 Bolts edge cutting Inv PCOOI047778 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4120 1 002 06 1 002 06 Inv PROOOlO3446 Line Item Date Line Item Description 01 16 08 Edge Cutting Inv PROOOlO3446 Total Line Item Account 101 1320 4120 198 96 198 96 Ck 135588 Total 803 10 ZIEGLE 878 66 Total 318 047 03 Page 31 311 RP PRA J i ACQQUN rAQlnV CITY OF CHANHASSEN TOTAL CORPORATE ACTIVITY 29 588 15CR Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Description 01 02 01 02 74798268002000000000283 PAYMENT THANK YOU 00000 W Amount 29 588 15 PY KATHRYN AANENSON CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 235 00 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 235 00 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion Amount 01 11 01 10 24223698010516675822204 01 11 01 10 24223698010516675822212 SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 545 0505 MN SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952 545 0505 MN 4 11 200 00 35 00 CUSTOMER SERVICE CALL ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT SUMMARY PREVIOUS BALANCE 29588 15 1 800 344 5696 OTHER CHA R ES 45 020 01 STATEMENT DATE DISPUTED AMOUNT CASH ADVANCES 00 01 15 08 00 CASH ADVANCE FEES 00 LATE vlL 111 CHARGES 00 SEND BILLING INQUIRIES TO AMOUNT DUE CREDITS 30 96 PAYMENTS 29588 15 U S BANK 44 989 05 P O Box 6344 Fargo ND 58125 6344 ACCOUNT BALANCE 44 989 05 Page 1 of 7 312 R btUE Company Name CITY OF CHANHASSEN Corporate Account Number Statement Date 01 15 2008 SUSAN BILL Post Tran Date Date Reference Number 12 31 12 28 24387757363004014723267 12 31 12 28 24610437363010178691750 01 11 01 10 24427338010720004098422 KEVIN CROOKS Post Tran Date Date Reference Number 12 21 12 20 01 02 12 31 01 09 01 07 01 10 01 08 01 15 01 13 24427337354720006464917 24445008001128561475959 24399008008080002161368 24399008009080002162456 24492808014512760582816 CHARLES A EILER Post Tran Date Date Reference Number 01 04 01 03 24164078003091008077152 TODD GERHARDT Post Tran Date Date Reference Number 12 28 12 26 24164077361755241808965 01 07 01 03 24129428004100000983026 01 07 01 04 24427338004720007037755 01 07 01 04 24445008005133306714403 CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 157 56 CASHADV 0 00 TOTAlACTIVITY 157 56 Amount 122 64 10 63 24 29 Amount 19 33 61 91 15 92 8 05 203 95 Amount I d 58 14 GREGG GESKE CREDITS PURCHASES CASH ADV TOTAL ACTIVITY 0 00 15 92 0 00 15 92 Posl Tran Date Date Reference Number Amount 01 07 01 05 24055238005200035000919 MN 15 92 DALE GREGORY CREDITS PURCHASES CASH ADV TOTAL ACTIVITY T 0 00 27 04 0 00 27 04 Transaction Descri lion MICHAELS 6733 EDEN PRAIRIE MN OI15fR qlo 211 THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 0I1 5btJ4lr u CUB FOODS CHANHASSEN MN 0 8ftiO J 30 CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 309 16 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 309 16 Transaclion Descri lion CUB FOODS CHANHASSEN MN 101 1 n 04 0 OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN I 00 10 q 41 0 OREILLY AUTO 00015099 CHANHASSEN MN 400 lOIC 4110 OREILLY AUTO 00015099 CHANHASSEN MN 41 0 EDDIE BAUER 0076 BURNSVILLE MN to I VVVUT0 40 CREDITS 0 00 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 58 14 PURCHASES 58 14 Transaction Descri lion TARGET 00008623 CHANHASSEN N 1D1 ctO CREDITS 0 00 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 84 78 PURCHASES 84 78 Transaction Descri tion HOUUHANS 00111021 CHANHASSEN MN lDIII 1 1 A2 O LORD FLETCHERS SPRING PARK MN t7l I 1 BYERLY S CHANHASSEN CHANHASSEN MN ID J I JO A2 1 D CARIBOU COFFEE CO 116 CHANHASSEN MN r Page 2 of 7 313 Com an Name CITY OF CHANHASSEN Cor orate Account Number Statement Date 01 15 2008 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descr tion Amount 01 14 01 11 24765018012200788300605 FUDDRUCKERS EDEN PRAIRIE MN 101 1550 4310 27 04 COREY GR GEN CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 12 114 04 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 12 114 04 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descr tion Amount 12 18 12 17 12 27 12 26 01 02 12 31 01 02 12 31 01 02 12 31 01 03 01 03 01 07 01 04 01 09 01 08 24270767351611001027156 24692167360000067539001 24071058001380179113763 24445007365126997100961 24445007365126997101043 24692168003000837990410 24692168004000960146839 24388948008230132392926 SETON NAME PLATE COMPANY 800 243 6624 CT D i oD4I 518 90 WWW NEWEGG COM 800 390 1119 CA4CO lS e1 Ll 1 O 191 29 DLT SOLUTIONS 800 2624358 VA 101 04 1 t f 1 4 281 02 CDW GOVERNMENT 800 800 4239 IL f CiO 41a l l4 O 1 884 00 CDW GOVERNMENT 800 800 4239 IL 4C 411 5 41 500 55 DMI DELL K 121GOVT 800 981 3355 TX400 1154 10 1 741 54 DMI DELL K 12 GOVT 800 981 3355 TX 4 it oO 2 989 31 MERLlNS ACE HARDWARE CHANHASSEfffl OIIIV 0 101 0 7 43 TODD HOFFMAN CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 517 95 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 517 95 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number CREDITS 0 00 Amount 01 09 01 07 24332398008000314616078 01 14 01 11 241581380130019121429 LAURIE A HOKKANEN TOTAL ACTIVITY 77 86 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number I i 12 31 12 28 24692167362000245310927 01 07 01 03 24427338004710025666883 01 07 01 05 24427338005720007704999 Transaction Description Amount GJP FAST COMPANY 515 248 7693 NY IDI Hdo 9 97 EINSTEIN BROS 1842 CHANHASSEN MNLD n 6 v 20 25 BYERLY S CHANHASSEN CHANHASSEN MN 0 D 40 0 47 64 TOM KNOWLES CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 1 196 32 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 1 196 32 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion Amount 12 24 12 22 24210737356206305800225 WOLFF FORDING COMPANY 804 648 2423 VA 01 10 01 08 24332398009900110180220 LEO S DANCEWEAR 773 8897700 IL 577 00 619 32 KAREN M LAR CREDITS 30 96 PURCHASES 141 76 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 110 80 Page 3 of 7 314 rv Companv Name CITY OF CHANHASSEN Corporate Account Number Statement Date 01 15 2008 EwiACl ivi r Post Tran Date Date Reference Number 12 24 12 21 24493987356286623902233 01 02 12 31 24717058001690013020234 01 04 01 03 74493988003207399600025 HARK L1TTFIN CREDITS 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 31 36 PURCHASES 31 36 CASH ADV 0 00 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion 01 07 01 03 24445008004132197477741 OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN 10 1110 4 10 BRETT MARTINSON KIM MEUWISSiia Post Tran Date Date 12 24 12 21 01 07 01 03 01 07 01 04 01 07 01 05 01 07 01 05 01 11 01 09 01 14 01 11 01 14 01 10 01 14 01 10 CREDITS 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 1 351 66 PURCHASES 1 351 66 CASH ADV 0 00 Reference Number Transaction Descri tion THE HOME DEPOT 2825 CHESKA MN O 10 l 4 t to OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN 1000 orod O OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN J 4 Sto WORKINGPERS 877 652 9675 IN O DCCO WEARGUARD 66478639 800 388 3300 MA DI cx co 4C5 THE HOME DEPOT 2825 CHESKA MN 101 OCCC 4 5 t TARGET 00008623 CHANHASSEN MNiol OO O4 lO OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN 701 l THE HOME DEPOT 2825 CHESKA MN 100 1Dl 41 O 24610437356010179129197 24445008004132197477667 24445008005133306714247 24492158006849823874719 24692168005000086874297 24610438010010179212726 24164078011091008402178 24445008011141135212244 24610438011010178154340 CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 21 29 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 21 29 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion 00008623CHANHASSEN MN O 704 12 18 12 17 24164077351091007282662 TARGET JERRITT W MOHN CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 100 00 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 100 00 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion 01 09 01 08 24164078008091008032731 TARGET 00008623 CHANHASSEN MN 10 TIM MOtpfNS CREDITS 0 00 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 13 99 PURCHASES 13 99 Amount Amount 31 36 Amount 43 13 42 58 228 27 72 00 160 39 372 66 258 04 172 49 2 10 Amount 21 29 Amount 100 00 Page 4 of 7 315 Comnanv Name CITY OF CHANHASSEN Cornorate Account Number Statement Date 01 15 2008 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion Amount 01 11 01 10 24445008011140466136683 BATTERIES PLUS PRIOR LAKE MNlO otc04d aO 13 99 DAVE H NINOW Post Tran Date Date 12 20 12 18 12 20 12 18 01 02 12 31 01 07 01 04 01 07 01 04 01 14 01 12 RICHARD D RICE Reference Number 24610437353010179137979 24910167353002568135086 24445008001128046134171 24717058005130053203339 24792628005206999100033 24692168012000835433495 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number 12 18 12 17 12 19 12 18 12 20 12 19 12 21 12 20 12 24 12 22 12 26 12 24 12 28 12 26 12 28 12 27 12 31 12 28 12 31 12 28 01 02 12 31 01 14 01 10 01 14 01 10 01 15 01 13 24388947351230164903629 24445007352106872732919 24445007353108585977186 24445007354110515662788 24692167356000646188300 24692167358000839582317 24013397361017815217544 24692167361000109628696 24013397363017867916397 24228997362700997130703 24445007365126997101126 24445008011140830407752 24445008011141135212327 24445008014144717773507 CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 347 49 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 347 49 Transaction Descri tion Amount THE HOME DEPOT 2825 CHESKA MN lOD OCC04 28 08 WACONIA FARM SUPPLYWACONIAMN 10 DOCCD 40r 0 76 46 KOHL S 704 ROGERS MN DO DCOO f rO 21 99 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS 230 SAINT LOUIS MOjOO q w 1t022 19 MERLlNS ACE HARDWARE CHANHASSEN MN lOCOO rDI O 32 33 WEARGUARD 66523339 800 388 3300 M O 0D004 O 166 44 CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 24 793 66 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 24 793 66 Transaction Descri tion Amount MERLlNS ACE HARDWARE CHANHASSEN M I I M04 a IPO 43 61 CDW GOVERNMENT 800 800 4239 IL I II It SaG 226 31 CDW GOVERNMENT 800 80D 4239IL4bO r 1 jg J 1 357 88 CDWGOVERNMENT 800 80D 4239IL40 1 I D44 1 0410 812 60 DMI DELL K 12 GOVT 800 981 3355 TXo rv A J 2 511 06 DMI DELL K 12 GOVT 80Q j a 1 X 40 la r 70 1 629 86 CIT INC 651 4500333 MN lUJ alV n 13 173 60 HGO HANDANGO 866 576 0596 T 410a 89 82 CIT INC 651 4500333 MN 0 0 4 468 40 BENCHMARK NEW HORI18NS J 8 68 i1 J IIIpD4370 6 300 00 CDW GOVERNMENT 800 800 4239 IL tO O 11 4 1 4 07 001 32 BARNES NOBLE 204Q90 EDEN PRARIE N IV U Cl 28 78 OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN OI IIIP 4So 86 53 OFFICE MAX CHANHASSEN MN fOl 11 0 46o 63 89 I I I I Post Tran Date Date Reference Number 01 09 01 08 24129428008100002790029 01 09 01 08 24129428008100002790037 CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 280 11 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 280 11 Transaction Description ATTACHMENTS DIRECT INC ALEXANDRIA MN lb I SC ATTACHMENTS DIRECT INC ALEXANDRIA MN C V 1 l4O Amount 263 01 17 10 ROGER SMALLBECi CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 99 60 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 99 60 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion 01 14 01 13 24427338013720003919070 CUB FOODS CHANHASSEN MN 10 I O Amount 51 03 Page 5 of 7 316 Comoanv Name CITY OF CHANHASSEN Comorate Account Number Statement Date 01 15 2008 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descrl tion Amount 01 14 01 12 24493988012200099400287 PARTY AMERICA 1017 CHANHASSEN MN JEAN STECKLlNG CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 469 00 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 469 00 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion Amount 01 04 01 03 24266578003286358500748 U OF M CCE 612 625 4259 MN 101 17 0 260 00 01 09 01 08 24692168008000398498600 REI CONSTRUCTION BULLE 877 902 9 2 MA 10 3104300 209 00 GREG STICHA CREDITS PURCHASES CASH ADV TOTAL ACTIVITY 0 00 355 00 0 00 355 00 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Amount 01 08 01 08 24055248008286972800011 355 00 JOHNillrUTZMAN CREDITS PURCHASES CASH ADV TOTAL ACTIVITY 0 00 135 24 0 00 135 24 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion Amount 12 20 12 19 24427337353720006160805 CUB FOODS CHANHASSEN MNIDI IltD O 4 50 01 07 01 04 24164078004091008270848 TARGET 00008623 CHANHASSEN MN 4 74 01 14 01 12 24692168012000866763257 TARGET CENTER 612 673 1313 MN 7 126 00 MARJORIE A THEIS CREDITS PURCHASES 9ASH ADV TOTAL ACTIVITY 0 00 104 02 0 00 104 02 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descri tion PARTY AMERICA 1017 CHANHASSEN MN 01 170 JIMMY JOHNS CHANHASSEN MN 10 I II OA 2 J r NEOPOST INC 8008673738 CA L IV U Amount 01 03 01 02 01 14 01 11 01 14 01 08 24493988003200099400080 24013398012018229713178 24493988012892015118322 CORI WALLIS CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES 1 376 98 CASH ADV 0 00 TOTAL ACTIVITY 1 376 98 Post Tran Date Date Refer nce Number Transaction Descri tion Amount THE HOME DEPOT 2825 CHESKA MN O D45 225 16 OFFICE MAX 877 633 4236IL 0 C OCO 766 76 THE HOME DEPOT 2825 CHESKA MN1 0 OCOO4 385 06 01 04 01 02 24610438003010177670049 01 07 01 04 24445008005133306714320 01 07 01 03 24610438004010178297080 Page 6 of 7 48 57 1 04 41 21 61 77 317 im Company Name CITY OF CHANHASSEN Corporate Account Number Statement Date 01 15 2008 MIKE LER dd CREDITS 0 00 PURCHASES uu uCASHADV u uTOTAlACTIVITV 605 08 0 00 605 08 Post Tran Date Date Reference Number Transaction Descr tion Amount NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT MINNETONKA MN 0 loa04 ctD41 53 KARRIER COMPANY 330 8239597 OH 239 01 THE HOME DEPOT 2825 CHESKA MN 210 87 THE HOME DEPOT 2825 CHESKA MN lo Od 04 @O 113 67 12 21 12 20 24692167354000494482039 12 21 12 20 24717057354153549309121 12 24 12 21 24610437356010179131342 01 02 12 31 24610438001010178311397 Department 00000 Total Division 00000 Total 44 989 05 44 989 05 Page 7 of 7 318